From general-return-2133-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 01 15:07:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98655 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 15:07:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 15:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 25490 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 15:07:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25064 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 15:07:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25056 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 15:07:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:07:14 +0000 Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so490553wwb.5 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:06:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LLeRkFnW2xmWuQ0PKv0hSNY+S4lPpRMOVHh8Holkf2c=; b=MMjKqWH/CSIwYynGokX5798bCBV4zcc4VYqMlnAblxbUEGsKUi0gEsaFiuNQjppzcW YgbPrM/daMEIdm9/pA13qrErOjjb6mKaZG0P1fO/g6/tzzk35k9tuvaVJZtT5sc1Irpa 89bCoAhXQasIV4KM4ESHDHQaOx1i5xHAsjCi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WT1fOPKv4AmzJWfv/gDcl/Q4EuUsvmz/sd/IhaonFDZbzmaPVcupp36cYnLM6k6kHq v4OlGa7dZf2SXaFo9gTChhkijt8VdsJfEQ+HhSqie3Bc/91fnc0cc/Wi+KZO6uxYmmOP TzeLLy2FavKDX1db/OreJ+1O/u5qXs8b0M0xg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.153.140 with SMTP id f12mr2211173wek.111.1285945614642; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.145 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:06:54 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Is it possible write directly to datanode's? From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b54dc8fb24c04918f8bcf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b54dc8fb24c04918f8bcf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi guys, I gotta a question and I really would appreciate some help, suggestion, or advices. Is it possible write directly to the datanode's and eliminate the bottleneck to write into HDFS? for example: I gotta 40 writers and I writes th data direct to namenode, i was wondering if it would become a bottleneck so I would like to know if it is possible to write the data direct to the datanode's. I've read that Hadoop doesnt support multiple writes so how can we deal with big cluster? I mean I am really going to have this bottleneck??? Thanks in advanced. --0016e65b54dc8fb24c04918f8bcf-- From general-return-2134-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 04:28:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94628 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 04:28:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 04:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2672 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 04:27:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2122 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 04:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2114 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 04:27:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:27:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.23] (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:27:44 +0000 Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEB9B33BCBA for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:27:23 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7b43ae00000547d-60-4ca6b4aa26f9 Received: from [17.151.95.191] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.95.191]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 39.69.21629.BA4B6AC4; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:27:23 -0700 (PDT) From: rahul Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:27:22 -0700 Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Hi, I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up = Hadoop Cluster on two nodes.=20 And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on the = hadoop cluster using command line. or=20 Hadoop version "df", Unix command. Any input is helpful. Thanks Rahul= From general-return-2135-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 06:14:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12845 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 06:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 06:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 43982 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 06:14:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43504 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 06:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43496 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 06:14:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of glenn.gore@melbourneit.com.au designates 203.147.157.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.147.157.18] (HELO bne3-0002mri.server-mail.com) (203.147.157.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:14:46 +0000 Received: from wic002mz.server-mail.com (wic002mz.server-mail.com [210.247.173.2]) by bne3-0002mri.server-mail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B88118009 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:14:21 +1000 (EST) Received: from wic002mitef.messaging.mit ([172.31.0.12]) by wic002mz.server-mail.com with - id DiE91f0070FY6JL3NiEM2e; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:14:21 +1000 Received: from WIC001MITEBCLV1.messaging.mit ([172.31.0.20]) by wic002mitef.messaging.mit with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:14:09 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB61F8.F74C3C33" Subject: RE: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:13:18 +1000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Thread-Index: Acth6jNxZ+WCuCqDS0Sxho1TgErmUAADrR6s References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> From: "Glenn Gore" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2010 06:14:09.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[06C054D0:01CB61F9] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB61F8.F74C3C33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hadoop dfsadmin -report Regards Glenn -----Original Message----- From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of = "df". =20 Hi, I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up = Hadoop Cluster on two nodes.=20 And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on the = hadoop cluster using command line. or=20 Hadoop version "df", Unix command. Any input is helpful. Thanks Rahul ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB61F8.F74C3C33-- From general-return-2136-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 12:13:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83142 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 12:13:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 12:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 85826 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 12:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85361 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 12:13:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85353 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 12:13:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:13:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of palmercliff@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:13:10 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so720732wye.35 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:12:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g1iODifIfhHpJepOL44Y5fz2VMttuP1gkcN0H7lXpsc=; b=YfgIFtP9igCK1YjCoKFJXkae5XcmHBY+Kf7j4txrHyeaR4i8Y9dKzf1FWILqv7VINM QtcNfCauyMbQO8/d97ELxPPYG63Cc3INxUdN+7jVjDrnTY4iZmImzR3VgT6O15eGLKNL 0yHYMWeJuLqQjS1en+j+pjv7DG+csjAqm598s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ems/kYOVy/gqXvld04rTCFAtxW+K4wVN+401ukhgRETroGgaOIQByF7btw4kIRrxqn /bBnXgFdFgLUN3V9Cye04XSnR8XRkCR33vD+mOHNdyFIcQJN/A2OBIcx+XabNIgHTFGw mlx4za301RNvH7b0HvSvl9BCL0FN0pRFIxdrM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.205 with SMTP id 55mr5583702wex.51.1286021568974; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.79.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 05:12:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:12:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it possible write directly to datanode's? From: cliff palmer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d2cbdcad04a0491a13add --0016364d2cbdcad04a0491a13add Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Marcos, NFS will let you write almost anywhere..... On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: > Hi guys, I gotta a question and I really would appreciate some help, > suggestion, or advices. > Is it possible write directly to the datanode's and eliminate the > bottleneck > to write into HDFS? > for example: I gotta 40 writers and I writes th data direct to namenode, i > was wondering if it would become a bottleneck so I would like to know > if it is possible to write the data direct to the datanode's. > I've read that Hadoop doesnt support multiple writes so how can we deal > with > big cluster? I mean I am really going to have this bottleneck??? > > Thanks in advanced. > --0016364d2cbdcad04a0491a13add-- From general-return-2137-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 14:39:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19848 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 14:39:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 14:39:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 49915 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 14:39:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49385 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 14:39:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49377 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 14:39:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:39:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:39:30 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so4535615wwb.29 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SDhW64ZvG2fdEpbYobNL/QYcKgLpChxjzX9AvvwA4pU=; b=e4kYcOmheZ47OBdZbGPlpCmo3Hjc0b8u991SMxrCARJavNGVgLHW54HaXoWVqoSF1o 9e+EbN9NXA89+sXRh+bDfpz+KGo3mRlkfvXUNCAq1ulFkXMWJGY+SZ7NrJ4C+JBUcAO3 Gn92YtJT7mGtJDcvSEO57WKCIUoeDndLfCrrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fY3CVUVHwAyRV5kRZar9jFFhDDVktCAiEM97spEEhEzbFGbS9NCX5ZXVcfcKS+vbuj 1xxL88eMJXfTiBIzPx19SoI5luREqWxhUP48QxrcP1uFRkK24RxcMkf7zF9PsKYvKimN gfCQ4qBCOW/n2B+fM/3B8/sL35cjxC07RUo1w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.184.19 with SMTP id r19mr5709718wem.36.1286030349700; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.145 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:39:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ea56a2a0d6a0491a3460c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64ea56a2a0d6a0491a3460c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I gotte the same problem, I remember it was something realted to user's partition. for example I created hadoop user so HDFS took the closest partition to user. I dont remenber exaclty but it was something like that. I hope it helps u in someway. On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Glenn Gore wrote: > hadoop dfsadmin -report > > Regards > > Glenn > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". > > Hi, > > I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up Hadoop > Cluster on two nodes. > > And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. > > Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on the > hadoop cluster using command line. > > or > > Hadoop version "df", Unix command. > > Any input is helpful. > > Thanks > Rahul > > --0016e64ea56a2a0d6a0491a3460c-- From general-return-2138-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 16:53:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55594 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 16:53:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 16:53:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 29035 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 16:53:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28907 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 16:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28899 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 16:53:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:53:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.23] (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:53:04 +0000 Received: from relay15.apple.com (relay15.apple.com [17.128.113.54]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1211B353051 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7b3eae0000066cf-f5-4ca7635bc402 Received: from [17.151.77.246] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.77.246]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 53.6C.26319.B5367AC4; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: rahul In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:52:42 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4DDC93DB-A7B8-400C-9618-F72E3125BD3B@apple.com> References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Hi Marcos, Same thing is happening for me as well.=20 I have multiple disks mounted to my system but by default when i format = it took the nearest/ disk in which hadoop binary is present. Is there a way in which I can format all the drives mounted to my system = ? So can we control in some way the drives or the places which we want to = format for hdfs? Thanks, Rahul On Oct 2, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: > I gotte the same problem, I remember it was something realted to = user's > partition. > for example I created hadoop user so HDFS took the closest partition = to > user. > I dont remenber exaclty but it was something like that. I hope it = helps u in > someway. >=20 > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Glenn Gore = wrote: >=20 >> hadoop dfsadmin -report >>=20 >> Regards >>=20 >> Glenn >>=20 >>=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] >> Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of = "df". >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up = Hadoop >> Cluster on two nodes. >>=20 >> And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. >>=20 >> Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on the >> hadoop cluster using command line. >>=20 >> or >>=20 >> Hadoop version "df", Unix command. >>=20 >> Any input is helpful. >>=20 >> Thanks >> Rahul >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2139-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 16:55:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55791 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 16:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 16:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 30385 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 16:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30286 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 16:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30278 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 16:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.23] (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:55:20 +0000 Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F5CB35319A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:54:59 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7b8eae0000035ac-b0-4ca763e38c32 Received: from [17.151.77.246] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.77.246]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 4F.27.13740.3E367AC4; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:54:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: rahul In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:54:59 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Glenn On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Glenn Gore wrote: > hadoop dfsadmin -report >=20 > Regards >=20 > Glenn >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of = "df". >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up = Hadoop Cluster on two nodes.=20 >=20 > And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. >=20 > Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on the = hadoop cluster using command line. >=20 > or=20 >=20 > Hadoop version "df", Unix command. >=20 > Any input is helpful. >=20 > Thanks > Rahul >=20 From general-return-2140-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 18:58:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1956 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 18:58:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 18:58:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 45748 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 18:58:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45683 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 18:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45675 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 18:58:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:58:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:58:11 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so4126577iwn.35 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JDDm6S3GhrhpnUyTGo1CB+ueVDYPENupnxMt2Gaqf1s=; b=JBIJlN5qtB4YEsEQGrbKxasMZMYnmcN5mXBtRg/NHG6iFdeKayqe7UIH3BNwS9q3Zh q3XiU+Nd4vDbpBb0fHza9ErH9XmeLk4AurOc60Lt1Y1t60x/TsRECJNmo0ekMVcKPDb2 nUr3atzvyeLYqHNXUZn8K4J9qu95LLxhJOjww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=K6eEdFR/9tXz1FtOdNKfkC+YGSOV1udFg2iKPjV0r0iAIfgjPeWSo2Fam7B3eF3G02 HPFX8lMMRaRtZ06OY48yhdAZDbyAlbop/ZtWLKgExNdMvymgjWFGCtjoDi2wUNkiidWR 440zlQOvO9Zabb1v+rBh7Kf6xAQJ+0j3r+2cA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.152.143 with SMTP id g15mr7497238ibw.76.1286045870543; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.12.140 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:57:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:57:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it possible write directly to datanode's? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I suggest you read this: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/hdfs_design.html -ryan On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: > Hi guys, I gotta a question and I really would appreciate some help, > suggestion, or advices. > Is it possible write directly to the datanode's and eliminate the bottleneck > to write into HDFS? > for example: I gotta 40 writers and I writes th data direct to namenode, i > was wondering if it would become a bottleneck so I would like to know > if it is possible to write the data direct to the datanode's. > I've read that Hadoop doesnt support multiple writes so how can we deal with > big cluster? I mean I am really going to have this bottleneck??? > > Thanks in advanced. > From general-return-2141-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 21:16:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34106 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 21:16:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 21:16:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 13839 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 21:16:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13679 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 21:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13671 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 21:16:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:16:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:16:29 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1053225wye.35 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NYATcC8ORh8kyWOzVXWk+KoRGk/Qi2TTHNYNM7tAyS0=; b=EKo17oVsUfTWmf+5bNwBz7ona63hvOdU4ap56Vz3QAvF4OoE6KHh/ivoTGn5yfel5p P2Rp6/76CMR51E8s333qthaAWuvrhrih9tHuYP7V/6eX8aH/tvM8sWoHh6ZBuR4/188m OXqOM/cDO4mlgwakVlSsUEhbolnM1UKH5N7Nw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mrAFsDCV6+FDT4UTGvrbEvHvZnaiiCv7NeK78B+jYEhbaEN4Z9NkAUku/SWZfujtub 2eCrBf290iZfs64Q8xV8a/bwO6Wg2lcBudwqC3N/8O+cr6/oE4uCJv3+KErgymXSKV4e Z00TbZLADUBgcaE+sYz1TkpmbWknjrmiuz1pc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.26.211 with SMTP id c61mr1139103wea.26.1286054168551; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.145 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:16:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it possible write directly to datanode's? From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34693e0e26e0491a8d163 --001636d34693e0e26e0491a8d163 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Guys, I misunderstood the picture in the hadoop site. Now I know that the namenode says in which datanode should be written and which part of file. So I dont need to worry about it. Thanks. On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > I suggest you read this: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/hdfs_design.html > > -ryan > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: > > Hi guys, I gotta a question and I really would appreciate some help, > > suggestion, or advices. > > Is it possible write directly to the datanode's and eliminate the > bottleneck > > to write into HDFS? > > for example: I gotta 40 writers and I writes th data direct to namenode, > i > > was wondering if it would become a bottleneck so I would like to know > > if it is possible to write the data direct to the datanode's. > > I've read that Hadoop doesnt support multiple writes so how can we deal > with > > big cluster? I mean I am really going to have this bottleneck??? > > > > Thanks in advanced. > > > --001636d34693e0e26e0491a8d163-- From general-return-2142-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 03 04:33:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49113 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2010 04:33:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2010 04:33:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 48999 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 04:33:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48700 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 04:32:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48692 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2010 04:32:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:32:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jgray@facebook.com designates 69.63.178.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.178.183] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.178.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:32:51 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.176] ([10.18.255.176:27669] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta015.snc1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id 13/4E-13534-E5708AC4; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:32:30 -0700 Received: from SC-MBX04.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.3.231]) by sc-hub03.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::1cfe:1f6b:8b35:cf7f%11]) with mapi; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:32:30 -0700 From: Jonathan Gray To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Thread-Topic: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Thread-Index: AQHLYeoyLan6Ia1UEk6/C4gnBUqBgQADrR6sky4TQICAACVQAIAATLFw Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 04:32:52 +0000 Message-ID: <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A39242820F01F1CA@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com> References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> <4DDC93DB-A7B8-400C-9618-F72E3125BD3B@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <4DDC93DB-A7B8-400C-9618-F72E3125BD3B@apple.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rahul, There is a ton of documentation available for Hadoop (including books). Best place to start is the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ On your specific issue, you need to configure Hadoop to tell it what direct= ories to store data. The configuration parameter name is 'dfs.data.dir' and you need to put in a= comma-delimited list of directories to use to store data. JG > -----Original Message----- > From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 9:53 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version > of "df". >=20 > Hi Marcos, >=20 > Same thing is happening for me as well. >=20 > I have multiple disks mounted to my system but by default when i format > it took the nearest/ disk in which hadoop binary is present. >=20 > Is there a way in which I can format all the drives mounted to my > system ? >=20 > So can we control in some way the drives or the places which we want to > format for hdfs? >=20 > Thanks, > Rahul >=20 > On Oct 2, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: >=20 > > I gotte the same problem, I remember it was something realted to > user's > > partition. > > for example I created hadoop user so HDFS took the closest partition > to > > user. > > I dont remenber exaclty but it was something like that. I hope it > helps u in > > someway. > > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Glenn Gore > wrote: > > > >> hadoop dfsadmin -report > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Glenn > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > >> Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM > >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org > >> Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version > of "df". > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up > Hadoop > >> Cluster on two nodes. > >> > >> And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. > >> > >> Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on > the > >> hadoop cluster using command line. > >> > >> or > >> > >> Hadoop version "df", Unix command. > >> > >> Any input is helpful. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Rahul > >> > >> From general-return-2143-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 03 17:58:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21374 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2010 17:58:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2010 17:58:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 68961 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 17:58:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68889 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 17:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68881 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2010 17:58:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:58:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.22] (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:58:35 +0000 Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB987ACE0A17 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807130-b7cf8ae0000058d2-31-4ca8c43693b0 Received: from [17.151.97.209] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.97.209]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 02.04.22738.634C8AC4; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: rahul In-Reply-To: <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A39242820F01F1CA@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:58:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1DB033BE-79E4-45DC-B4C5-046DF165CF59@apple.com> References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> <4DDC93DB-A7B8-400C-9618-F72E3125BD3B@apple.com> <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A39242820F01F1CA@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Thanks Jonathan, Its really of great help. Rahul On Oct 2, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote: > Rahul, >=20 > There is a ton of documentation available for Hadoop (including = books). >=20 > Best place to start is the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ >=20 > On your specific issue, you need to configure Hadoop to tell it what = directories to store data. >=20 > The configuration parameter name is 'dfs.data.dir' and you need to put = in a comma-delimited list of directories to use to store data. >=20 > JG >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] >> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 9:53 AM >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop = version >> of "df". >>=20 >> Hi Marcos, >>=20 >> Same thing is happening for me as well. >>=20 >> I have multiple disks mounted to my system but by default when i = format >> it took the nearest/ disk in which hadoop binary is present. >>=20 >> Is there a way in which I can format all the drives mounted to my >> system ? >>=20 >> So can we control in some way the drives or the places which we want = to >> format for hdfs? >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Rahul >>=20 >> On Oct 2, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: >>=20 >>> I gotte the same problem, I remember it was something realted to >> user's >>> partition. >>> for example I created hadoop user so HDFS took the closest partition >> to >>> user. >>> I dont remenber exaclty but it was something like that. I hope it >> helps u in >>> someway. >>>=20 >>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Glenn Gore >> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> hadoop dfsadmin -report >>>>=20 >>>> Regards >>>>=20 >>>> Glenn >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] >>>> Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM >>>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>> Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version >> of "df". >>>>=20 >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up >> Hadoop >>>> Cluster on two nodes. >>>>=20 >>>> And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. >>>>=20 >>>> Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on >> the >>>> hadoop cluster using command line. >>>>=20 >>>> or >>>>=20 >>>> Hadoop version "df", Unix command. >>>>=20 >>>> Any input is helpful. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>> Rahul >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >=20 From general-return-2144-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 12:49:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5812 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 12:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 12:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 79341 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 12:49:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78933 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 12:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78925 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 12:49:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:49:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:49:14 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so6461665wwb.29 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:48:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0GDAZSZu9UfXbWkcTugxDN7x+fItTZRqYjTzODQdSI4=; b=tO4ZDdolni6hcJzoiW2MRbbphqfx634hayk5jgjN9V8ReT7ScBm+G/rt8C3dC2rGaH CcI8v3CM3hDSepqytAdH4e3i0ZPGMcHTlD8/Dg9FeyNgdiJj/uYzIMUp5mxWxfmymLJX mX3EyDZwpLaVlVOB1yi+zE5DvFIboD81+WS2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RGrBcEKpjJbcmp81BhemN/eeIFhcuyQ0FkeiIppbKKsr4/aqcTvtrtEKrZiOO+eQ5/ d4jFJaHdl5M59BFfNY9rco1TEiSFMDsKMy2cciQiA5bhd5xOTrou63nvKoMIdIQfc2fX fuvFuAvmk2vbJ6FIdr4li849qgVRMK7WXGE+g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.70 with SMTP id s48mr5235847wes.27.1286196534197; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.51.145 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:48:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1DB033BE-79E4-45DC-B4C5-046DF165CF59@apple.com> References: <1C4C43FE-05F2-464B-9F04-AC972988C326@apple.com> <4DDC93DB-A7B8-400C-9618-F72E3125BD3B@apple.com> <5A76F6CE309AD049AAF9A039A39242820F01F1CA@sc-mbx04.TheFacebook.com> <1DB033BE-79E4-45DC-B4C5-046DF165CF59@apple.com> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:48:54 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version of "df". From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c72bb885e7b0491c9f73e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364c72bb885e7b0491c9f73e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HDFS takes the memory available from the closest partition to your hadoop.tmp.dir(core-site.xml). I hope it helps you. user hadoop => /home/hadoop On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:58 PM, rahul wrote: > Thanks Jonathan, > > Its really of great help. > > Rahul > On Oct 2, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > Rahul, > > > > There is a ton of documentation available for Hadoop (including books). > > > > Best place to start is the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ > > > > On your specific issue, you need to configure Hadoop to tell it what > directories to store data. > > > > The configuration parameter name is 'dfs.data.dir' and you need to put in > a comma-delimited list of directories to use to store data. > > > > JG > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > >> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 9:53 AM > >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version > >> of "df". > >> > >> Hi Marcos, > >> > >> Same thing is happening for me as well. > >> > >> I have multiple disks mounted to my system but by default when i format > >> it took the nearest/ disk in which hadoop binary is present. > >> > >> Is there a way in which I can format all the drives mounted to my > >> system ? > >> > >> So can we control in some way the drives or the places which we want to > >> format for hdfs? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Rahul > >> > >> On Oct 2, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Marcos Pinto wrote: > >> > >>> I gotte the same problem, I remember it was something realted to > >> user's > >>> partition. > >>> for example I created hadoop user so HDFS took the closest partition > >> to > >>> user. > >>> I dont remenber exaclty but it was something like that. I hope it > >> helps u in > >>> someway. > >>> > >>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Glenn Gore > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> hadoop dfsadmin -report > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> Glenn > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: rahul [mailto:rmalviya@apple.com] > >>>> Sent: Sat 10/2/2010 2:27 PM > >>>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org > >>>> Subject: Total Space Available on Hadoop Cluster Or Hadoop version > >> of "df". > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 version for data processing by setting up > >> Hadoop > >>>> Cluster on two nodes. > >>>> > >>>> And I am continuously adding more space to the nodes. > >>>> > >>>> Can some body let me know how to get the total space available on > >> the > >>>> hadoop cluster using command line. > >>>> > >>>> or > >>>> > >>>> Hadoop version "df", Unix command. > >>>> > >>>> Any input is helpful. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Rahul > >>>> > >>>> > > > > --0016364c72bb885e7b0491c9f73e-- From general-return-2145-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 20:17:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89350 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 20:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 20:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 61644 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 20:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61565 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 20:17:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61557 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 20:17:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:17:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:17:38 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so10787296iwn.35 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=12YPfLx4XV2yOFkMF78jRw6lcvhb8VzUdPAKG8458rU=; b=M4PMAMYr+IdCbi6p3A6fHvjM/QloTn/+QZYQU06ZCLz5tzxDUJ1DrYeer4bi3hNVWo Y7WhBMmOlmJG4p4Kgseq/N6/RR3GBrFKim0pU0webdA9nzY0n5mmHaxa7kpLv35fmDlm NC8EtqAhNmxRnde8Jhkk6hU3TuA7KRj0y6lAw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=NGoUcfP9tLuJVDMlLCgg/vED9sFjLqyq9AFRhv5wl5mu2WPa5VWtYzxEt1xiO+oJwa g+fgLs8ib3LCHD3Ja+XlDl6wFKoKdQYxd4GtJYx7UbNSNHUH56l+4zZb+gz9Lq7SbsEb kWRHTY+GETqMYQEI3beZisclvn76buWngmo4g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.149.140 with SMTP id t12mr14510345ibv.100.1286396237458; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.19.137 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:17:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ACRzZXto3gBOzxrC-iLr_wFT94s Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.89.20100924, our third 'developer release', is now available for download From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The HBase Team would like to announce the availability of the third in our 'developer release' series, hbase-0.89.20100924. Binary and source tar balls are available here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ You can browse the documentation here: http://hbase.apache.org/docs/r0.89.20100924/ This release contains a rollback of some features that were added to the master in 0726 that made it more unstable, but also contains about 40 fixes for bugs (including more reliable region server failovers) and performance improvements. Our 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its definitely not for production deploys. See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions for more on the new hbase versoning and our developer releases series. Also, please have a look at the KNOWN_ISSUES.txt file next to the tar balls for critical issues you need to be aware of. Thanks to all who contributed to this release. Yours, The HBase Team From general-return-2146-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 20:01:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1269 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 20:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 20:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 62587 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 20:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62504 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 20:01:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62496 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 20:01:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:01:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davidlary@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:01:33 +0000 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so619032ywo.35 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=7bSlKHZ9QyMTVE8v0hie5xnJ/L27HeaayLt6jDu+HA0=; b=wPI1GLGZZI628IO+N1mc8R3pMtgSnh+Avf7aBICKcP/gK9GHxr1NwRS5XgaqWSj5x/ iyNPQPQg93i44PKp3TwLAuCOZ+nftnEaQWy0OVLC8StPCVp5bHxnHBw8+eWY6++KsW4T 63jFeBpRd/IwctGyWpKmpi4KPdaQLoUaq+7ME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=I1wIcABGPMmjvL31hSl+p1jL4JO/GIjw3w8mAhH412lDkX646JyccLWKEFSzj/b4Yq zUDmLSjVEcFqc6ky9jIBdy+9iheBn2RorT1sJm2GyHyOjijfawCK6MsW7/onkM/9KpMw BnLd7facrnmNXFN+uqhjSdpoz0LV/8+ytAcRY= Received: by 10.236.109.44 with SMTP id r32mr6203951yhg.16.1286568072477; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.174] (utdpat241007.utdallas.edu [129.110.241.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m25sm2646895yha.43.2010.10.08.13.01.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:01:11 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: DFS error Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:01:09 -0500 Message-Id: <3C526026-7FFD-4E20-819B-58DE5738B577@gmail.com> Cc: David Lary To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please can someone help. Tried to set up pseudo-distributed mode for DFS. When I do start-dfs.sh = I get the error message below, and am not sure what it means. Any help = would be most appreciated. Thanks David The conf/hdfs-site.xml file contains: fs.defaults.name hdfs://localhost:8020 $ start-dfs.sh starting namenode, logging to = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-namenode-129.1= 10.31.40.out localhost: starting datanode, logging to = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-datanode-129.1= 10.31.40.out localhost: starting secondarynamenode, logging to = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-secondarynamen= ode-129.110.31.40.out localhost: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:134) localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:1= 56) localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:1= 60) localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.initialize(Second= aryNameNode.java:131) localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.(SecondaryN= ameNode.java:115) localhost: at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.main(SecondaryNam= eNode.java:469) From general-return-2147-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 09 11:15:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34617 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2010 11:15:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Oct 2010 11:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 32471 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2010 11:15:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32305 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2010 11:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32297 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2010 11:15:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:15:07 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so944836wyb.35 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 04:14:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nH/1HP5d8k9t7Tvalv4xEuUWXLRkqsm6PcLU7zWNvQg=; b=FJUQZXNXaLSzF3i4gGAZy5YluIJC+ird2KHZyfS5k5fPCYwORTpZmYHbP+p3rbbPBK pqzK1DgGypg66UxJj7ttOL6Jxgj58+P37y7jGYRqeoBQmr0eHFpqQoZu1B0ABP0nROzn sbleExlSLP/G0V+PuDNr1dAtempbKtU4RDjcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HCqz7TbmFNIlUKlXpzTa+SRbAdu+ZMQl2xJ8Ol1ZLgJlUsR09lI50XFElmPThQJfZS 6Zja7T+iWn1Meh4rp3MVyYnbwq0PNGlJlkzxiUMiNp0eRq/MDbMznajcYZRMZmnCo1KY PKmkoFK2VmKIBfJegiep7uIdS38IVqWwwmAGo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.128.196 with SMTP id l4mr3641330wbs.32.1286622886784; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 04:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.136 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 04:14:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3C526026-7FFD-4E20-819B-58DE5738B577@gmail.com> References: <3C526026-7FFD-4E20-819B-58DE5738B577@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 22:14:46 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DFS error From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b400c206fe104922d3ced X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b400c206fe104922d3ced Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 looks like hadoop couldn't find the uri of your second name node. what's in your conf/master? On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:01 AM, David Lary wrote: > Please can someone help. > > Tried to set up pseudo-distributed mode for DFS. When I do start-dfs.sh I > get the error message below, and am not sure what it means. Any help would > be most appreciated. > > Thanks > > David > > The conf/hdfs-site.xml file contains: > > > fs.defaults.name > hdfs://localhost:8020 > > > > > > $ start-dfs.sh > starting namenode, logging to > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-namenode-129.110.31.40.out > localhost: starting datanode, logging to > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-datanode-129.110.31.40.out > localhost: starting secondarynamenode, logging to > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-secondarynamenode-129.110.31.40.out > localhost: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:134) > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:156) > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:160) > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.initialize(SecondaryNameNode.java:131) > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.(SecondaryNameNode.java:115) > localhost: at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.main(SecondaryNameNode.java:469) > > > > --0016e65b400c206fe104922d3ced-- From general-return-2148-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 10 03:02:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90290 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2010 03:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Oct 2010 03:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36607 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 03:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36526 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 03:01:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36518 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2010 03:01:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:01:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davidlary@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:01:48 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1006887gxk.35 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:01:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=6pBGICbX5piJE7zWRGQ4jSfKjiIOl1WQrCUhuMa2omM=; b=Zf0mspWBCCS5cBpyXD9bK+Lfzdl/3LfBavxnd673Qwm3Xp4Lm45CXWALaz5dRRv1wN HUPBjaRQxwsW6sE2PXqvk5V1pFKoZa5C87tg5YDYyenoML+ta0tzm+6V+viFuHrd3IjS cMThHQ22/hvdKOpfKmEMVYrL+B93N++UZ9h54= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=v7hE4VgywvHsIzbnczAgNZyii6tYmINSU+yf5Puwalv2kaWhRYR/P0IXkklRSfzFTx ePEnD7lXXx/d1mlSM3SKXf45R0eLLBEEvYrDghSzKQVyHicxsHpOU/uM/6SJ5WN3yUao C3ELh4ln7la8uH+t1Zy8KIv0YvPOB6+EjWUcg= Received: by 10.151.27.6 with SMTP id e6mr1393056ybj.404.1286679687599; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-70-123-100-2.tx.res.rr.com [70.123.100.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q29sm4494587yba.6.2010.10.09.20.01.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: DFS error Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: David Lary In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 22:01:24 -0500 Cc: David Lary Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3C526026-7FFD-4E20-819B-58DE5738B577@gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, elton sky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Thanks,=20 conf/masters contains: localhost David On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:14 AM, elton sky wrote: > looks like hadoop couldn't find the uri of your second name node. = what's in > your conf/master? >=20 > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:01 AM, David Lary = wrote: >=20 >> Please can someone help. >>=20 >> Tried to set up pseudo-distributed mode for DFS. When I do = start-dfs.sh I >> get the error message below, and am not sure what it means. Any help = would >> be most appreciated. >>=20 >> Thanks >>=20 >> David >>=20 >> The conf/hdfs-site.xml file contains: >> >> >> fs.defaults.name >> hdfs://localhost:8020 >> >> >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> $ start-dfs.sh >> starting namenode, logging to >> = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-namenode-129.1= 10.31.40.out >> localhost: starting datanode, logging to >> = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-datanode-129.1= 10.31.40.out >> localhost: starting secondarynamenode, logging to >> = /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-secondarynamen= ode-129.110.31.40.out >> localhost: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException >> localhost: at >> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:134) >> localhost: at >> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:1= 56) >> localhost: at >> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:1= 60) >> localhost: at >> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.initialize(Second= aryNameNode.java:131) >> localhost: at >> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.(SecondaryN= ameNode.java:115) >> localhost: at >> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.main(SecondaryNam= eNode.java:469) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2149-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 06:38:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74047 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 06:38:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 06:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 32911 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 06:38:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32571 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 06:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32563 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 06:38:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:38:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:38:43 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so2283643wyb.35 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:38:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RaYJKTR8F6y+0uDZgncl4ndwh7ck9Ssy2oXcqFPuzXc=; b=skWwj7wAoXbTK0pIxB1wwGSR0rrmm33c4R8ea7+rDm4gaDTtCPrRep09aIB6Oh0ryb rU7pldmYqOWk6Ph1/S6XziORtPrf7nSPcivOSreodX1n5YjlG/+9iPoH8N+/7dmD9CVF 8XlbCqbVYGQWAdELW0JSCLsGNLKrIkszpj+qs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GWp7Kba1J2O2Ppq+A/+3K6FHi2vkJlknvFaQmm8jH75A+1vdRSAVxdK60K9YfXHEZN ZMFZJV+JAbPgg7OD+jzYwXARfpOGNk3t8/Opej8JGThzO72TiZThGK4/hgwMM7IM8SlQ dLXcm8gEkaE6m056xUnuyth979Mkoy6hGxZt8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.238.37 with SMTP id z37mr3292248weq.26.1286779101634; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.185.207 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:08:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Task tracker failed to start From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001517401fa441e1700492519b7f --001517401fa441e1700492519b7f Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517401fa441e1620492519b7d --001517401fa441e1620492519b7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi , I am using hadoop-0.20.2 in 2 Nodes cluster. But Tasktracker in dedicated datanode failed to start. Error i can see is :- " INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=TaskTracker, sessionId= - already initialized " Detailed error log is attached. Where is the problem? Thanks and Regards Vaibhav Negi --001517401fa441e1620492519b7d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi ,

I am using hadoop-0.20.2 in 2 Nodes cluster. But Tasktracker in= dedicated datanode failed to start.
Error i can see is :-

&quo= t; INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Met= rics with processName=3DTaskTracker, sessionId=3D - already initialized &qu= ot;

Detailed error log is attached.
Where is the problem?

Thanks = and Regards

Vaibhav Negi
--001517401fa441e1620492519b7d-- --001517401fa441e1700492519b7f-- From general-return-2150-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 11:52:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51226 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 11:52:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 11:52:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 12867 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 11:52:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12745 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 11:52:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12737 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 11:52:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:52:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hadoop.li@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:52:30 +0000 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so1208896pzk.35 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=N4pCFgHl4kNK9QnguiPTml7tWMDzo0gAqTbNpdLKml8=; b=IMz9QP3SF3HuT2Svk5bktWOYHHDqqwiFkJuqYzbl608xJBir3VnUFObr9HUZJbKD07 W1pfRJd7DA0fmE8ByNJorNK/YgjXFfEj7KfsSDgi0KJyhJKqIWiPvrZVx4lCYbcZ4oGF QjhURhDEbY4PIwlxM20Id9QESj8pBoUy1Pn40= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=E+b9zPV+v9MLh+gi0WcGfQ0+4idWNgEXQyK6rLR7UaE1C83pIdBDOVeRXpky2TJ3Kc EeC0h7HOKqNsKbJD0yUm4rlK4knLKdafqf6w7r/T5ea/DBw6VMccb0OdENaWlaIRZn9p elGR52haVDPT9gTzRxsVxW7iG8GDPTLecpOro= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.212.9 with SMTP id k9mr2499970wfg.77.1286797928584; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.210.7 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3C526026-7FFD-4E20-819B-58DE5738B577@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:52:08 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DFS error From: Weiwei Li To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd331ee6e5712049255fd55 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd331ee6e5712049255fd55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How about change localhost to 129.110.31.40? 2010/10/10 David Lary > Thanks, > > conf/masters contains: > > localhost > > David > > On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:14 AM, elton sky wrote: > > > looks like hadoop couldn't find the uri of your second name node. what's > in > > your conf/master? > > > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:01 AM, David Lary wrote: > > > >> Please can someone help. > >> > >> Tried to set up pseudo-distributed mode for DFS. When I do start-dfs.sh > I > >> get the error message below, and am not sure what it means. Any help > would > >> be most appreciated. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> David > >> > >> The conf/hdfs-site.xml file contains: > >> > >> > >> fs.defaults.name > >> hdfs://localhost:8020 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> $ start-dfs.sh > >> starting namenode, logging to > >> > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-namenode-129.110.31.40.out > >> localhost: starting datanode, logging to > >> > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-datanode-129.110.31.40.out > >> localhost: starting secondarynamenode, logging to > >> > /Users/davidlary/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs/hadoop-davidlary-secondarynamenode-129.110.31.40.out > >> localhost: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException > >> localhost: at > >> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:134) > >> localhost: at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:156) > >> localhost: at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.getAddress(NameNode.java:160) > >> localhost: at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.initialize(SecondaryNameNode.java:131) > >> localhost: at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.(SecondaryNameNode.java:115) > >> localhost: at > >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode.main(SecondaryNameNode.java:469) > >> > >> > >> > >> > > --000e0cd331ee6e5712049255fd55-- From general-return-2151-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 12:21:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61165 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 12:21:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 12:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 35112 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 12:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34680 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 12:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34662 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 12:21:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:21:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:21:18 +0000 Received: by yxg6 with SMTP id 6so1309689yxg.35 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:20:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5WwQDbJ31VPuPbkZ6xb9PukjLT/cEOsBMHfyrfh7mEI=; b=UZUK2RK9kEHIk7DFq9SC0oCKIYLgGIBgnWPJi/HM8KNqk0JHpZJoKquy19E2fqtUmu /+2UisEsvIG+h4jgon6IFifrSOKpaWD5egsdasOzmx/aAzBrZ6L1tuaYqbZb9OjvIJei qshaR8SC252av5qezAWeqNBoI3foh4z5FHyNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XFPxqtHazBOh0yIoga350qxp/j7N631htYO83zrgq7itDxAbN53g5tTaz2wIFuZTtw EEtYVzUEJWJPbHxg9OcHXC0lJc5B2XOTTJW2tkqsO2qhcMkeoDVgYwqEXFoivFGyQC8g XXmwIbTt0RhYiNDlQdfWGVGecOczv9lvTkfvc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.83.5 with SMTP id k5mr372884ybl.295.1286799656808; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.211.17 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: newbie setup question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am planning to setup Hadoop in our environment. We only want the hdfs portion and not really interested in mapreduce. I've been using, http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) to setup my cluster and so far its going well. I was wondering if there is any newer documentation or howto I should follow. TIA From general-return-2152-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 13:11:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66463 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 13:11:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 13:11:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 68829 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 13:11:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68687 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 13:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68676 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 13:11:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:11:23 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so3922939wyb.35 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.181.84 with SMTP id k62mr6774474wem.76.1286889062842; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.178.210 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:11:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: newbie setup question From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163642768574c15d04926b352a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163642768574c15d04926b352a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, To get started with the version of HDFS that's found in CDH3, see https://docs.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Hadoop+Installation+Documentation+for+CDH3 . Regards, Jeff On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > I am planning to setup Hadoop in our environment. We only want the > hdfs portion and not really interested in mapreduce. > > I've been using, > > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) > to setup my cluster and so far its going well. I was wondering if > there is any newer documentation or howto I should follow. > > TIA > --00163642768574c15d04926b352a-- From general-return-2153-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 04:01:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50701 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 04:01:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 04:01:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 27695 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 04:01:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26426 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 04:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26403 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 04:01:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.204] (HELO nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:01:07 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2010 04:00:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.10] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2010 04:00:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2010 04:00:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 205679.62479.bm@omp1010.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 64909 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Oct 2010 04:00:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286942445; bh=K6ESYR+xC/rzVGOgXDghXbzvNHO+fm78n/aF7Leg32U=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SkQ1QiHfRAWD4QwMo44ZyTxxitRo5iPaxPKM4lJATyp3qPvbyTrxp8xnLbpswQUihoK7VhLflqrz9NEEF7KztngMlKbYUtZ5yzE/5pqbGfj4H/mXNAjJGaqV4niMPznmRuhU91a1ov8YXPbwXmjjjT2T8hZbPZ//Xx0VoKPsuKs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FyB63MSw4FgJeHawsnpyun+vvx4BQNh46hbJ8RmiY6UxqCqOS6oyQRzFIihqFkIXo1+YRLn+a08iCUgCmbyBxgn60Vd4R8VFIyWWaG796Eugtcbcu2wao40D1ETBHx36avISdVwJ1/MbYETN8v7Ss82DzS3jjteMmwoWmp5hixs=; Message-ID: <680770.64071.qm@web110202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Gpm4hBAVM1k98D07_uPwpM7ChWsXRna09pLb6zhfHoHYzSG 2KQe.6X8alLkeVny6UmfFaySjHR90IQ.ryrNVow3J48cMVZtVB1p0dORAdRa 715Xo4NLfwiKRoLvA7lU5bTqpeDMsUtYUUZJ2.bLg36NoGj4MghoFYbdNoub rPk2Zh9AqNqLLvn4PwQ50lM7c6pu.CI_g5FRIXXvnAU9figElejOH1zOl6gA ZqkvhMoSFd094D5ulh8YCyVCwuW4sfx7cIoCFrzJQxGqpyK.h9fcuGQ6Db0J S_w4P4TP0k7uUlMnEKeTw6goY4k.z_oN9NIZp1jzbjz83gVnyyjS3ZIA- Received: from [71.80.224.31] by web110202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:00:45 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.106.282862 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:00:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Smith Subject: Mailing list for posting a job opportunity To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-417116068-1286942445=:64071" --0-417116068-1286942445=:64071 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am starting a new cloud computing technology startup to develop a Hadoop-= based =0Asoftware for CleanTech applications and looking for a developer wi= th deep Hadoop =0Aexperience to join the founding team. I would like to kno= w if Apache has a =0Amailing list to post opportunities of such nature, one= similar to Eclipse Job =0AForum mailing list. If yes, I would very much ap= preciate a pointer. If not, I =0Awant to gauge level of interest from this = community to start one (a job mailing =0Alist). =A0=A0=A0=0A=A0=0ARoger Smi= th --0-417116068-1286942445=:64071-- From general-return-2154-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 04:02:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50981 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 04:02:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 04:02:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 32961 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 04:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32038 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 04:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32024 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 04:02:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:02:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paliwalashish@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:02:21 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so5028328wyb.35 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:02:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WrLY+CAFY2Yg1dZZiBsFeioBO2XTeBk3tAnQuE78w1Q=; b=RfvfklmnEb94Q3kclLNSIfRP2bMNEdt+Hu2t1QQwBXB2ugF754r1gnYPpJGXTYqxDj RQDmiJYO8dy61Rv5Fw+qg0noxujc4c/xULnibS21sr/t1/6u+j4iWqcSL0zvCVQHqoow 037lAQgX1XOaQde3mBBRgEHn4IW2E9OkwiNT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aobqZeiir1PuwHbNsgCGYaVhtYY2FihA6tJfbxmvAzzo0NxONd0Nm8ONAjmc2gR0RZ yH/gDPFi25uGOkNObVhWUjRLVqg/E6IDlhEa4tkOgsJNw/qn+9lBbkBXWefQDeabKCMc IjkST35c3Gr1Bns2Eo22lOmiuURsTWmHOrBDE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.203 with SMTP id t53mr7689210wet.37.1286942520966; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.73.14 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <680770.64071.qm@web110202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <680770.64071.qm@web110202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:32:00 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mailing list for posting a job opportunity From: Ashish To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jobs@apache.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Roger Smith wrote: > I am starting a new cloud computing technology startup to develop a Hadoop-based > software for CleanTech applications and looking for a developer with deep Hadoop > experience to join the founding team. I would like to know if Apache has a > mailing list to post opportunities of such nature, one similar to Eclipse Job > Forum mailing list. If yes, I would very much appreciate a pointer. If not, I > want to gauge level of interest from this community to start one (a job mailing > list). > > Roger Smith -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal From general-return-2155-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 12:58:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32858 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 12:58:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 12:58:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2378 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 12:57:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1916 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 12:57:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1267 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 12:57:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:57:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.72.192.221] (HELO fmmailgate01.web.de) (217.72.192.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:57:47 +0000 Received: from smtp04.web.de ( [172.20.0.225]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FC016EC84D9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:57:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [89.246.34.1] (helo=[192.168.0.58]) by smtp04.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #24) id 1P60ta-0005ky-00 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:57:26 +0200 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:57:25 +0200 Subject: Architecture From: Andre Reiter To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Architecture Thread-Index: Actq1i6+hc039LXzJkiOs5oPzinFPA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: a.reiter@web.de X-Sender: a.reiter@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GXCbMHRQUIhOBAeK0UVlOe7mD4oiwI0j0QfnL jS4xS0vub1PUxGmEW+NM1BO1s1QMR3QBIB9WF0A5epNU+Ex7Dl AiKN+mPjQ= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everybody, i'm evaluating hadoop for a new platform. the application is a web based application, and the challange is to handle requests up to 1.000.000 times per second. this can actually be solved by load ballanced webservers. The problem now is to persist user data at real time. Let's say every request appends some data to the user record, i.e. 100 bytes are appended. The record would have an identifier placed in the cookie. The problem now is to look up the user record for every request at runtime. Is it possible to get the user record with the information about all former requests in a short time i.e. 50 ms ??? i hove no experience with hadoop yet every help would be very appreciated thanks in advance best regards andre From general-return-2156-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 13:10:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40583 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 13:10:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 13:10:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18517 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 13:10:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18350 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 13:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18342 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 13:10:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:10:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:09:55 +0000 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1892036ewy.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o4IhwstMQbMGI2FT24+a2RjPZ88mr9ZSIw05XVLL36U=; b=StNBa8ftXVEcmJMynL+dwh3n5RLWjaf2rvZPqUCahEDuzjVisGxyBhtLJM5NaftEH8 RFzNhfYA29/sUEh7i6W1vITI/Ni9looWkd3NruzS4xcNm2L2ksy6uWO2EGpg/Tp+gmVR NxjcYuWsYOhuIHN6bGh5FQJ/Hkykz9ibAe5yg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pwIt/VxsYmr0UTGZqMjn7+LoweQb0qvhMnragDo/904RfZkzdqaoK9RCBaUVCUocy/ 1eLqwCOlNGWd1fWAUGEzwBXi2BPwxrwcli7KBMlRRNFF9t8IZ24HR5277oaBTH+W5/8r uTUq9Mu37U0Qprhazi8hkjgvUMAL2onRMsrRM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.19.8 with SMTP id y8mr542677eba.94.1286975373666; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.127.137 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:09:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Architecture From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This sounds like you should be looking to HBase. HBase is a data store that builds on top of Hadoop to meet those kind of real time storage and retrieval requirements. HTH, Tim On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Andre Reiter wrote: > Hello everybody, > > i'm evaluating hadoop for a new platform. > the application is a web based application, and the challange is to handle > requests up to 1.000.000 times per second. this can actually be solved by > load ballanced webservers. > The problem now is to persist user data at real time. Let's say every > request appends some data to the user record, i.e. 100 bytes are appended. > The record would have an identifier placed in the cookie. > > The problem now is to look up the user record for every request at runtime. > Is it possible to get the user record with the information about all former > requests in a short time i.e. 50 ms ??? > > i hove no experience with hadoop yet > > every help would be very appreciated > thanks in advance > > best regards > andre > > > From general-return-2157-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 14:03:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59297 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 14:03:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 14:03:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 13667 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:03:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13189 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13168 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 14:03:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:03:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com designates 67.192.241.160 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.192.241.160] (HELO smtp160.dfw.emailsrvr.com) (67.192.241.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:03:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp16.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5D20640CEC for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:03:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Orig-To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from smtp192.mex07a.mlsrvr.com (smtp192.mex07a.mlsrvr.com [67.192.133.192]) by smtp16.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 2A9C740D1E; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFW1MBX20.mex07a.mlsrvr.com ([169.254.2.105]) by 207037-HUB09.mex07a.mlsrvr.com ([192.168.1.202]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:03:07 -0500 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:02:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Architecture Thread-Topic: Architecture Thread-Index: Actq31whAvM7GV4lRdiRdVunjAYwIQ== Message-ID: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Not to sound argumentative but because perhaps I have misunderstood, Hbase = doesn't seem well suited to realtime requests at all. Perhaps you could ela= borate on the architecture you would use to support this application? data starts here, goes here, this is done, it is accessed by a webserver he= re, etc Thank you! On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:10 AM, "Tim Robertson" wr= ote: > This sounds like you should be looking to HBase. HBase is a data > store that builds on top of Hadoop to meet those kind of real time > storage and retrieval requirements. >=20 > HTH, > Tim >=20 > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Andre Reiter wrote: >> Hello everybody, >>=20 >> i'm evaluating hadoop for a new platform. >> the application is a web based application, and the challange is to hand= le >> requests up to 1.000.000 times per second. this can actually be solved b= y >> load ballanced webservers. >> The problem now is to persist user data at real time. Let's say every >> request appends some data to the user record, i.e. 100 bytes are appende= d. >> The record would have an identifier placed in the cookie. >>=20 >> The problem now is to look up the user record for every request at runti= me. >> Is it possible to get the user record with the information about all for= mer >> requests in a short time i.e. 50 ms ??? >>=20 >> i hove no experience with hadoop yet >>=20 >> every help would be very appreciated >> thanks in advance >>=20 >> best regards >> andre >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2158-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 14:38:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74264 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 14:38:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 14:38:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 73068 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:38:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72701 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72693 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 14:38:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:38:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.francke@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:37:52 +0000 Received: by gwj23 with SMTP id 23so637302gwj.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=e19S1h+wlVY6obpdVPEGODQK9EDIFarSIuVJZqDr26Y=; b=dDT+1AvxCgjTBbbLW6lTqGAMaY1eMsOqJwP2shtDlaR+/DyZzMoQ0agwgqA2hk8Mww 85mJr9jW4zkJKnERgnbtjSCo418BvQ4wneeNBNjD3JlxLaP8zsyEggiGxrZQy+/0FehU JzvdVGM0qo3LtcI6wxcOsUf5nS0gTg2alUXes= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=jYcths4RBp7RFiE0sjtbUKKFx9k0YTsHW8ZX5p9IIAqqcFEApJZEPpRO9TIBO/YlQO iyfeeyXjdBk6dt202BZQTNl9e/cTqAb3oRCrIpsl6j7UDKOBqDrkhMiA+wK7Y+U5s0qe QsNm2aHzDr3Aeqn0O96vSfvrg2GYUxZ0PK/ok= Received: by 10.150.131.16 with SMTP id e16mr1114036ybd.415.1286980649315; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.212.20 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:36:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> References: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> From: Lars Francke Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:36:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Architecture To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Not to sound argumentative but because perhaps I have misunderstood, Hbase doesn't seem well suited to realtime requests at all. Perhaps you could elaborate on the architecture you would use to support this application? Quite the opposite. HBase is all about realtime requests. It's optimized for it. Here's the description from the homepage: "HBase is the Hadoop database. Use it when you need random, realtime read/write access to your Big Data. This project's goal is the hosting of very large tables -- billions of rows X millions of columns -- atop clusters of commodity hardware. Cheers, Lars From general-return-2159-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 14:46:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78179 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 14:46:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 14:46:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 91837 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91705 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:46:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91690 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 14:46:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:46:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:46:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 78127 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 14:46:03 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:46:03 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3171107bwz.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:46:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.200 with SMTP id y8mr7409433bks.107.1286981161211; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.77.11 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:46:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:46:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Architecture From: "Owen O'Malley" To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Here is a presentation from Hadoop Summit 2009 "HBase goes Realtime" that gives numbers for latency with HBase. Redirecting to common-user. http://bit.ly/aJEwYj -- Owen From general-return-2160-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 14:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81307 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 14:55:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 14:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 18621 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18549 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 14:55:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18540 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 14:55:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dsikar@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:55:13 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so8884251iwn.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SZbgjxQ5RtExSHiEQ7O0+ayDjzr2Jdz8XZY7KC4cBLg=; b=gdlqek69pG60ZDpPgAWGVSl02u3IlkE+4yw8E39ZD274iPk8qvRAJYgZRGYlh1ymqm oxznQqaW99hPZBiZYiW4AsWtMOgBqqUeCpx8WGmRUwcCSTFaam2hFSQsY75h9IE7YIaw pYMvS6Q2G7WWrvlAovERZB76OXbf8P/6Rooxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QMIkzJqx8s36K68g6YVTxQpuR/kkyBKk4MNl7mjWQAa4jhfz5EI9jjo1LKB95bCkOB 2mXlZVR5JNNOtpL2ZGsLMSJUQ8NehXOMwbY46yGJ6Ol5b5hpZbvrX7Q8URSua2ztKL7h nYeeQu7d59KEXc0mSrBaGoQUNJO1yOoQsJX44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.16.76 with SMTP id n12mr1808998iba.97.1286981691766; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.172.211 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:54:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> References: <80D1F44F-5D35-4764-8911-94907EAEAA36@announcemedia.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:54:51 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Architecture From: daniel sikar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Perhaps in-memory data grids could be considered? On 13 October 2010 17:02, Jonathan Creasy wr= ote: > Not to sound argumentative but because perhaps I have misunderstood, Hbas= e doesn't seem well suited to realtime requests at all. Perhaps you could e= laborate on the architecture you would use to support this application? > > data starts here, goes here, this is done, it is accessed by a webserver = here, etc > > Thank you! > > On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:10 AM, "Tim Robertson" = wrote: > >> This sounds like you should be looking to HBase. =A0HBase is a data >> store that builds on top of Hadoop to meet those kind of real time >> storage and retrieval requirements. >> >> HTH, >> Tim >> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Andre Reiter wrote: >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> i'm evaluating hadoop for a new platform. >>> the application is a web based application, and the challange is to han= dle >>> requests up to 1.000.000 times per second. this can actually be solved = by >>> load ballanced webservers. >>> The problem now is to persist user data at real time. Let's say every >>> request appends some data to the user record, i.e. 100 bytes are append= ed. >>> The record would have an identifier placed in the cookie. >>> >>> The problem now is to look up the user record for every request at runt= ime. >>> Is it possible to get the user record with the information about all fo= rmer >>> requests in a short time i.e. 50 ms ??? >>> >>> i hove no experience with hadoop yet >>> >>> every help would be very appreciated >>> thanks in advance >>> >>> best regards >>> andre >>> >>> >>> > From general-return-2161-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:12:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21672 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:12:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 74357 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74244 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74236 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:12:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:12:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.7] (HELO cir-el.real.com) (207.188.23.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:12:31 +0000 Received: from seacas01.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.56]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by cir-el.real.com with esmtp; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:12:11 -0700 id 001FC1A1.4CB63CCB.00000ECB Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas01.corp.real.com ([192.168.139.56]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:12:10 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:12:09 -0700 Subject: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Topic: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Index: ActrLBA21b1czM9DQzSf8HOBnG1wdQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B2EA53A1B10A4FE884E4313EFEE4CF39realcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_B2EA53A1B10A4FE884E4313EFEE4CF39realcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra ColumnFamilyInputFormat= , and also added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to DistributedCache.addF= ileToClassPath(). The JAR exists on the HDFS. When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/cassand= ra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the JVM s= tartup options??? Here is a code snippet: public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { ... public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options Configuration configuration =3D new Configuration(); Path path =3D new Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-b= eta2.jar"); log.info("main: adding jars..."); DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); System.exit(0); } public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { Job job =3D new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInput= Format.class); .. job.waitForCompletion(true); } FILE LISTING from HDFS: [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping impl=3Dorg.apache.had= oop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout=3D300000 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is deprecated. In= stead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 /user/hadoop/p= rofilestats -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 /user/hadoop/p= rofilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar --_000_B2EA53A1B10A4FE884E4313EFEE4CF39realcom_-- From general-return-2162-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:16:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24875 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:16:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78429 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78383 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78375 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:16:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.7] (HELO cir-el.real.com) (207.188.23.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:16:06 +0000 Received: from seacas01.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.56]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by cir-el.real.com with esmtp; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:45 -0700 id 001FC18F.4CB63DA1.0000163E Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas01.corp.real.com ([192.168.139.56]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:44 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Topic: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Index: ActrLI/clJ+XArMuTBaK1xfxJjkT9w== Message-ID: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org fyi- I also tried thr archive version--=20 calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra ColumnFamilyInputForm= at, and also > added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to DistributedCache.ad= dFileToClassPath(). > The JAR exists on the HDFS. > When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/cassa= ndra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that > makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. >=20 > I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". >=20 > Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the JVM= startup options??? >=20 > Here is a code snippet: >=20 > public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { > ... > public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { > // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options > Configuration configuration =3D new Configuration(); > Path path =3D new Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-= beta2.jar"); > log.info("main: adding jars..."); > DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); > System.exit(0); > } >=20 > public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { > Job job =3D new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); > job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInpu= tFormat.class); > .. > job.waitForCompletion(true); > } >=20 >=20 > FILE LISTING from HDFS: >=20 > [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr > 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping impl=3Dorg.apache.h= adoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout=3D300000 > 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is deprecated. = Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id > drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 /user/hadoop= /profilestats > -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 /user/hadoop= /profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar From general-return-2163-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:22:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29417 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:22:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:22:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 89092 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:22:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89044 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:22:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89036 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:22:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:22:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:22:00 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so1493192qwf.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.133 with SMTP id kk5mr8136069qcb.191.1287012099582; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.250.21 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> References: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64caedc047264049287db65 --0016e64caedc047264049287db65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How about adding it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH if not already. On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > fyi- I also tried thr archive version-- > > calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); > > On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > > > I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra > ColumnFamilyInputFormat, and also > > added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to > DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(). > > The JAR exists on the HDFS. > > When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > org/apache/cassandra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that > > makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. > > > > I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". > > > > Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the JVM > startup options??? > > > > Here is a code snippet: > > > > public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { > > ... > > public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { > > // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options > > Configuration configuration = new Configuration(); > > Path path = new > Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar"); > > log.info("main: adding jars..."); > > DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); > > > > > > > > > > > > ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); > > System.exit(0); > > } > > > > public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { > > Job job = new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); > > > job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInputFormat.class); > > .. > > job.waitForCompletion(true); > > } > > > > > > FILE LISTING from HDFS: > > > > [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr > > 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping > impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; > cacheTimeout=300000 > > 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is deprecated. > Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id > > drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 > /user/hadoop/profilestats > > -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 > /user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar > > --0016e64caedc047264049287db65-- From general-return-2164-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:39:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34263 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:39:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:39:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 12934 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12864 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12856 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:39:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.7] (HELO cir-el.real.com) (207.188.23.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:38:58 +0000 Received: from seacas01.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.56]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by cir-el.real.com with esmtp; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:38:38 -0700 id 001FC19E.4CB642FE.000033D7 Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas01.corp.real.com ([192.168.139.56]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:38:37 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:38:35 -0700 Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Topic: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Index: ActrL8IzR9NPEpvzRAaAgcgLUdK2wg== Message-ID: <70A4FF20-6FB5-41AC-B05D-5DBA51FA90D4@real.com> References: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Add it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH on all machines running the task? I can try that, but I'd like users to be able to execute jobs using jars fr= om their own hdfs directory. On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > How about adding it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH if not already. >=20 > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Moores wrote: >=20 >> fyi- I also tried thr archive version-- >>=20 >> calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); >>=20 >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: >>=20 >>> I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra >> ColumnFamilyInputFormat, and also >>> added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to >> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(). >>> The JAR exists on the HDFS. >>> When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >> org/apache/cassandra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that >>> makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. >>>=20 >>> I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". >>>=20 >>> Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the J= VM >> startup options??? >>>=20 >>> Here is a code snippet: >>>=20 >>> public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { >>> ... >>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { >>> // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options >>> Configuration configuration =3D new Configuration(); >>> Path path =3D new >> Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar"); >>> log.info("main: adding jars..."); >>> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); >>> System.exit(0); >>> } >>>=20 >>> public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { >>> Job job =3D new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); >>>=20 >> job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInputFor= mat.class); >>> .. >>> job.waitForCompletion(true); >>> } >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> FILE LISTING from HDFS: >>>=20 >>> [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr >>> 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping >> impl=3Dorg.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; >> cacheTimeout=3D300000 >>> 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is deprecated= . >> Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id >>> drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 >> /user/hadoop/profilestats >>> -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 >> /user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2165-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:41:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34498 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:41:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:41:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 15603 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15541 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:41:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:41:42 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so1504194qwf.35 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:41:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.17 with SMTP id ki17mr8172657qcb.37.1287013280585; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.250.21 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:41:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <70A4FF20-6FB5-41AC-B05D-5DBA51FA90D4@real.com> References: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> <70A4FF20-6FB5-41AC-B05D-5DBA51FA90D4@real.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:41:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630f87369189c049288211d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163630f87369189c049288211d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Do that only on the machine which is launching the job. On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > Add it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH on all machines running the task? > I can try that, but I'd like users to be able to execute jobs using jars > from their own hdfs directory. > > > On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > > > How about adding it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH if not already. > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Moores > wrote: > > > >> fyi- I also tried thr archive version-- > >> > >> calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); > >> > >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > >> > >>> I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra > >> ColumnFamilyInputFormat, and also > >>> added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to > >> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(). > >>> The JAR exists on the HDFS. > >>> When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > >> org/apache/cassandra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that > >>> makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. > >>> > >>> I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". > >>> > >>> Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the > JVM > >> startup options??? > >>> > >>> Here is a code snippet: > >>> > >>> public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { > >>> ... > >>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { > >>> // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options > >>> Configuration configuration = new Configuration(); > >>> Path path = new > >> Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar"); > >>> log.info("main: adding jars..."); > >>> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); > >>> System.exit(0); > >>> } > >>> > >>> public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { > >>> Job job = new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); > >>> > >> > job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInputFormat.class); > >>> .. > >>> job.waitForCompletion(true); > >>> } > >>> > >>> > >>> FILE LISTING from HDFS: > >>> > >>> [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr > >>> 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping > >> impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; > >> cacheTimeout=300000 > >>> 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is > deprecated. > >> Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id > >>> drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 > >> /user/hadoop/profilestats > >>> -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 > >> /user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar > >> > >> > > --00163630f87369189c049288211d-- From general-return-2166-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:48:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35854 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:47:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:47:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20211 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:47:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20162 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:47:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20154 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:47:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:47:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:47:54 +0000 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so8916736qyk.14 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:47:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.197.5 with SMTP id ei5mr7332409qab.35.1287013653213; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.250.21 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:47:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> <70A4FF20-6FB5-41AC-B05D-5DBA51FA90D4@real.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:47:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb12b9ef6910492883799 --20cf300fb12b9ef6910492883799 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Also you dont necessarily need to use DistributedCache API from your application. You can supply libjars flag from command line to supply additional jars to mappers and reducers. Take a look : http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Usage (look for libjars option) On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Do that only on the machine which is launching the job. > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > >> Add it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH on all machines running the task? >> I can try that, but I'd like users to be able to execute jobs using jars >> from their own hdfs directory. >> >> >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: >> >> > How about adding it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH if not already. >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Moores >> wrote: >> > >> >> fyi- I also tried thr archive version-- >> >> >> >> calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); >> >> >> >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: >> >> >> >>> I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra >> >> ColumnFamilyInputFormat, and also >> >>> added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to >> >> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(). >> >>> The JAR exists on the HDFS. >> >>> When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >> >> org/apache/cassandra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that >> >>> makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. >> >>> >> >>> I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". >> >>> >> >>> Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to the >> JVM >> >> startup options??? >> >>> >> >>> Here is a code snippet: >> >>> >> >>> public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { >> >>> ... >> >>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { >> >>> // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options >> >>> Configuration configuration = new Configuration(); >> >>> Path path = new >> >> Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar"); >> >>> log.info("main: adding jars..."); >> >>> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); >> >>> System.exit(0); >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { >> >>> Job job = new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); >> >>> >> >> >> job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInputFormat.class); >> >>> .. >> >>> job.waitForCompletion(true); >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> FILE LISTING from HDFS: >> >>> >> >>> [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr >> >>> 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping >> >> impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; >> >> cacheTimeout=300000 >> >>> 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is >> deprecated. >> >> Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id >> >>> drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 >> >> /user/hadoop/profilestats >> >>> -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 >> >> /user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar >> >> >> >> >> >> > --20cf300fb12b9ef6910492883799-- From general-return-2167-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 17:18:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3785 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 17:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 17:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 81618 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 17:18:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81555 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 17:18:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81547 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 17:18:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.4] (HELO kal-el.real.com) (207.188.23.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:18:07 +0000 Received: from seacas01.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.56]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by kal-el.real.com with esmtp; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:17:47 -0700 id 000806B1.4CB73B3B.00005431 Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas01.corp.real.com ([192.168.139.56]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:17:46 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:17:45 -0700 Subject: Re: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Topic: Specifying the InputFormat class that exists in a JAR on the hdfs Thread-Index: Actrw7gYBsQ1mYCuShOQR67Jjeo6sQ== Message-ID: <8147FF31-729A-484D-B0B3-81F9DF96E793@real.com> References: <2EB7C48D-7640-4B76-8135-9120E39031A6@real.com> <70A4FF20-6FB5-41AC-B05D-5DBA51FA90D4@real.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I moved back from hadoop 21.0 to 20.2 and things look better. But I'm a little confused on how things are working: My InputFormat class attempts to connect to cassandra on localhost. I have JobTracker/NameNode running on one server, and TaskTracker/DataNode = running on 8 other machines (slaves). I also have cassandra running on those hadoop slaves. =20 I execute the hadoop job on the JobTracker machine, and I get a connection = refused exception attempting to connect to cassandra. I expected the InputFormat to run on the 8 TaskTracker machines.. but it l= ooks like it's just running locally. On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Also you dont necessarily need to use DistributedCache API from your > application. You can supply libjars flag from command line to supply > additional jars to mappers and reducers. >=20 > Take a look : > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Usage = (look > for libjars option) >=20 > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: >=20 >> Do that only on the machine which is launching the job. >>=20 >>=20 >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Michael Moores wrote= : >>=20 >>> Add it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH on all machines running the task? >>> I can try that, but I'd like users to be able to execute jobs using jar= s >>> from their own hdfs directory. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: >>>=20 >>>> How about adding it to HADOOP_CLASSPATH if not already. >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Moores >>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> fyi- I also tried thr archive version-- >>>>>=20 >>>>> calling DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath(path, configuration); >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Michael Moores wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I have specified my InputFormat to be the cassandra >>>>> ColumnFamilyInputFormat, and also >>>>>> added the cassandra JAR to my classpath via a call to >>>>> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(). >>>>>> The JAR exists on the HDFS. >>>>>> When I run my jar I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >>>>> org/apache/cassandra/hadoop/ColumnFamilyInputFormat at the line that >>>>>> makes the job.setInputFormatClass() call. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I execute the job with "hadoop jar ". >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Will I need to put my cassandra JAR on each machine and add it to th= e >>> JVM >>>>> startup options??? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Here is a code snippet: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> public class MyStats extends Configured implements Tool { >>>>>> ... >>>>>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { >>>>>> // Let ToolRunner handle generic command-line options >>>>>> Configuration configuration =3D new Configuration(); >>>>>> Path path =3D new >>>>> Path("/user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar"); >>>>>> log.info("main: adding jars..."); >>>>>> DistributedCache.addFileToClassPath(path, configuration); >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> ToolRunner.run(configuration, new MyStats(), args); >>>>>> System.exit(0); >>>>>> } >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> public int run(String[] args) throws Exception { >>>>>> Job job =3D new Job(getConf(), "myjob"); >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>> job.setInputFormatClass(org.apache.cassandra.hadoop.ColumnFamilyInputFo= rmat.class); >>>>>> .. >>>>>> job.waitForCompletion(true); >>>>>> } >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> FILE LISTING from HDFS: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> [hadoop@kv-app02 ~]$ hadoop dfs -lsr >>>>>> 10/10/13 14:57:47 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping >>>>> impl=3Dorg.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; >>>>> cacheTimeout=3D300000 >>>>>> 10/10/13 14:57:48 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.task.id is >>> deprecated. >>>>> Instead, use mapreduce.task.attempt.id >>>>>> drwxr-xr-x - hadoop supergroup 0 2010-10-13 14:34 >>>>> /user/hadoop/profilestats >>>>>> -rw-r--r-- 3 hadoop supergroup 1841467 2010-10-13 14:34 >>>>> /user/hadoop/profilestats/cassandra-0.7.0-beta2.jar >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2168-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 20:36:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78368 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 20:36:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 20:36:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 12325 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12274 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12266 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 20:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:36:22 +0000 Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so715455gyh.35 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:36:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ov4WXJxI1893UMYsRPOgyv1Akr3314mi6bUZgAg/r5A=; b=Lazv41sP69M/jH/Zq4sJj3nLDwEvqlw6O6QZLCcDopgV1Xa9UHPzYwOAIbnWncJFiV yFIN7sA+GD0557Wb2v+CLmMr4wZXWMaSfAyw+yOWMYhIeqLJMlsqQ32nQhourl3SMBCJ 7/JEqw3ceW3M5rE17nBxNXDvlGBEhqx2sVr8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=jW+9KFOaPFaxf2oVjtb+UUQeOHqe5yqksK6lGkWTRwWSE52ICDQR7+reeu6VFXDMib X+XeDvvgN8401FlQlh/3OtqeED4nQNZQy422n3A1NoGyC2BB5SUy6Mj7Hnuvheto0twI GwcMBjHtmD2njtaa1AobgJ2aglTvKCQxtovh0= Received: by 10.42.28.9 with SMTP id l9mr1137190icc.104.1287174959776; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:35:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.164.16 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:35:38 -0700 (PDT) From: goutham patnaik Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:35:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: building mapreduce project on eclipse To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301d41c03dc39f0492adc647 --20cf301d41c03dc39f0492adc647 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i checked out (from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/mapreduce/trunk) the mapreduce project into eclipse. Following the instructions from the hadoop screencast (http://vimeo.com/4193623) and the hadoop eclipse setup instructions (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment), i did an ant build with the following targets selected - clean compile-mapred-test eclipse-files The ant build and the corresponding Build Project were successful, but eclipse still doesnt recognize classes / libraries from the hadoop-common project - which i also checked out and built (successfully). is there a way to include the hadoop-common project inside the mapreduce project ? Also, im looking to contribute to the hadoop project in the near future - do most committers out there checkout from and use eclipse for this ? or is there a more efficient way you've found to build your hadoop projects ? Thanks in advance Goutham --20cf301d41c03dc39f0492adc647-- From general-return-2169-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 20:52:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83285 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 20:52:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 20:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 37442 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:52:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37400 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37390 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 20:52:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:52:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:52:39 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so690319qwf.35 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:52:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.183.21 with SMTP id ce21mr1136739qcb.197.1287175928766; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:52:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:52:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: building mapreduce project on eclipse From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Goutham, Add separate common, hdfs and mr projects to your workspace. Then for the hdfs and mapreduce projects, select Build Path -> Configure Build Path, in the Projects tab of the Java Build Path add dependencies on the other projects. hdfs should depend on common, and mapreduce should depend on hdfs and common. Thanks, Eli On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, goutham patnaik wrote: > i checked out (from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/mapreduce/trunk) the > mapreduce project into eclipse. Following the instructions from the hadoop > screencast (http://vimeo.com/4193623) and the hadoop eclipse setup > instructions (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment), i did an > ant build with the following targets selected - > > clean > compile-mapred-test > eclipse-files > > The ant build and the corresponding Build Project were successful, but > eclipse still doesnt recognize classes / libraries from the hadoop-common > project - which i also checked out and built (successfully). is there a way > to include the hadoop-common project inside the mapreduce project ? > > Also, im looking to contribute to the hadoop project in the near future - do > most committers out there checkout from and use eclipse for this ? or is > there a more efficient way you've found to build your hadoop projects ? > > > Thanks in advance > > > Goutham > From general-return-2170-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 21:28:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1779 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 21:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 937 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 871 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 301 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:28:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:28:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 1373 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:27:51 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.0.149]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:27:51 +0000 Message-ID: <4CB8C756.5050806@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:27:50 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/30/2010 02:14 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Since most people seemed to think of it as a reasonable idea, I'm going > to create the hadoop-0.20-security branch and start the necessary work. I don't yet see this branch. Are you still intending to do this? Doug From general-return-2171-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 16 02:06:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91430 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2010 02:06:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 02:06:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 88239 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 02:06:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88187 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 02:06:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88179 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2010 02:06:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:06:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:06:15 +0000 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so1338501fxm.35 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:05:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uptBvhm0iUW1wrKhQmafuJnOUQDWsBwF9dJiphacLLo=; b=MvdyKmDDcQfB0UzomCZfIptK+HhHZK8Y9fOeNtiRf7UMoNHG9Z71rBc576RrfJ0UKj beEm5IBjQ6CpKaSv9PvroemYDKXLIcMZlLSkRo+HePw/JZTE5r+96CNXkQu7QuVXgXav V1IsbQ4F54dieH79/CTubTdVCYcYwq9zULdRw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sST591Uk+vHU+vVaOmpBz1O+V+3mFAjvVAyq1YKkdw6qhltbXnp+HC+ozU+QhwpL2D 0ktmW73ABHLX3vaWobLX7FdGGiTL2bKOOnS6owfpHpICyPsSo6iiqyJiiEE0/kapa7ae DdAOaPxmsUBSoA64lR6cIt9mfKfbHaecZAt1A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.83.1 with SMTP id g1mr850324mub.47.1287194753790; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.110.147 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.110.147 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 07:35:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: building mapreduce project on eclipse From: Harsh J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636416ed70e72cd0492b2622e --001636416ed70e72cd0492b2622e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sometimes there's faults in the .classpath file among the jars that are on the build path. Correcting those manually should fix this issue as am sure the ant build pulled down proper hadoop common and hdfs jars. They might just have wrong version names in .classpath sometimes (like say hadoop-core instead of common). Check it out and fix it. -- Harsh J http://www.harshj.com On Oct 16, 2010 2:06 AM, "goutham patnaik" wrote: i checked out (from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/mapreduce/trunk) the mapreduce project into eclipse. Following the instructions from the hadoop screencast (http://vimeo.com/4193623) and the hadoop eclipse setup instructions (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment), i did an ant build with the following targets selected - clean compile-mapred-test eclipse-files The ant build and the corresponding Build Project were successful, but eclipse still doesnt recognize classes / libraries from the hadoop-common project - which i also checked out and built (successfully). is there a way to include the hadoop-common project inside the mapreduce project ? Also, im looking to contribute to the hadoop project in the near future - do most committers out there checkout from and use eclipse for this ? or is there a more efficient way you've found to build your hadoop projects ? Thanks in advance Goutham --001636416ed70e72cd0492b2622e-- From general-return-2172-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 16 08:47:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98692 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2010 08:47:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 08:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 35233 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 08:47:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34896 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 08:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34875 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2010 08:47:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:47:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:47:00 +0000 Received: by vws15 with SMTP id 15so870403vws.35 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:46:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GgS0oNj+gO59vzsbj+z8Xy+XKEfXsEeXXBqPwXFQOGM=; b=F6//h/Oa48JR9iBYFFX7vtDczRDzDGeeL0NaHAODnu1xddPJrarYI/XjCoMqAhCsuJ PrzdUehqXL15zueohcyAjrswXj5e/VtpLpg38QvFBfUTqgSKX+ZZaq62Y93e84K/o0D4 TBp6C6gni8TlYfCvEujSAakYKIJJlXwnRtxjM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=HxkMXbd+7FK4d88OEyc3dxOIVcN/CWQ9lmkj/LgsrJC+bX0ml7pKR83P4KHeb0jPHp tjVrB2GsJ4lE3oLf7RjKOXenvSgRvzKb62r5HmQzQL8X/UvGkmtbjqRr3bijLdpnbLy4 KcBJ7M1ODYYN5HrLhYTOUuROSLieH/glMCw0o= Received: by 10.220.202.74 with SMTP id fd10mr266245vcb.226.1287218797477; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:46:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.164.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:46:17 -0700 (PDT) From: goutham patnaik Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:46:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: building hadoop projects (common, hdfs, mapreduce) on eclipse To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a97c2bff4c0492b7fba6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba53a97c2bff4c0492b7fba6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When trying to build these projects on eclipse following instructions from http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment, when trying to do an ant build, i get a http 502 error when trying to run the ivy-resolve target : [ivy:resolve] :::: ERRORS [ivy:resolve] SERVER ERROR: Bad Gateway url= https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml [ivy:resolve] SERVER ERROR: Bad Gateway url= https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [ivy:resolve] SERVER ERROR: Bad Gateway url= https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.jar [ivy:resolve] [ivy:resolve] :: USE VERBOSE OR DEBUG MESSAGE LEVEL FOR MORE DETAILS BUILD FAILED /Users/goutham/hadoop_src/hdfs/build.xml:1552: impossible to resolve dependencies: resolve failed - see output for details ive only been seeing this error for the last 3 hours or so - the ant build worked perfectly fine earlier in the day. Other https sites work fine for me Goutham --90e6ba53a97c2bff4c0492b7fba6-- From general-return-2173-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 16 12:54:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66012 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2010 12:54:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 12:54:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 69579 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 12:54:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69240 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 12:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69232 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2010 12:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:54:21 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so2517360iwn.35 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cm7F3FhQlLQrhpWgTfMbacbtzjeRNOLjdRdkPFKnkaw=; b=qZePgBSeKtJ5MzRQWOEDt35950J5XC34ZgywqWXKjOFKXtSY5Y37Q5Okp8M4gM57Uf H4K4zUwwhnKmVdXUJnkkCHn1FgQHaHe8FoNY6dwqgNPg4ka65Do8ksBPMDraRhpgTbnS ghfTyLe7SnBC9ZvHg5/aZLNvfRRcz3pR+f1TI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ONA1A7bSElrxgPELp/xcVY28dVn9mhJ0v7ErHBVbdT5EegalpS7XpvFpoeGROck7Nc QL2g6l+EDudffXaAYiq8u9IYuaRqGkwsCCv3oGAvlQR0ujP2Hoen+Xiu0VQ074xhHEMU cUCnuVIBNcZ5jRcJwmDjiCNWzAkzW0l1/qeBk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.30.72 with SMTP id t8mr1607718ibc.46.1287233640498; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.189.154 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:54:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: name node and secondary name node configuration query From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I am trying to trim down my configuration files to avoid confusion. If I were to setup something like this: 1 name node (192.168.0.1) , 1 secondary name node (192.168.0.2), and 10 clients. The name node and secondary namenode will not serve as a data node. The clients will access thru a shared NFS configuration, core-site.xml The datanode will only have, dfs.data.dir in hdfs-site.xml The name node will have, dfs.name.dir in hdfs-site.xml I am really not sure what I must do for my secondary name node. What should I place there? The idea is I want to reduce my configuration files. Any advise? From general-return-2174-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 16 17:56:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50768 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2010 17:56:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 17:56:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11550 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 17:56:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11492 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2010 17:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11484 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2010 17:56:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:56:31 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Q6GKqKOsy3odblwyH1wPwe0TBe3tHP0NDb8HGbOKTgTeZjT/fEoWsm7A NzMQZcXE8NV/jXed9P10GYQJkKrRISY61UzfSRpqWDbTLApMAsROvLcaU QJ/TQsZUFJv3eXw; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287251791; x=1318787791; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20name=20node=20and=20secondary=20name=20 node=20configuration=20query|Date:=20Sat,=2016=20Oct=2020 10=2017:56:09=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<6DA1C439-03E1-4EFF-A 788-52F90CDD47C0@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201 .0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=yftDvUA8wpTvwo0lW7WJ4ss6yF8AOGcfEh9AAjkfG/Q=; b=HnozB2wV4LuhEhrf+qVOyk6dkmdScYslIFC54zGWa8DWOYe3Z4UqvOKH 4ZkrnEUDZfDDjAdKXBYiIFo7c3/4QFUPs+GYP5rO3ywzI/xvskrwdktql uCfL3nHpIqvaRZv; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,340,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="16135346" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:56:09 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: name node and secondary name node configuration query Thread-Topic: name node and secondary name node configuration query Thread-Index: AQHLbTFIsX+V10TdKkuM3YkfPyNLVZNEUcmA Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:56:09 +0000 Message-ID: <6DA1C439-03E1-4EFF-A788-52F90CDD47C0@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 16, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Hello, > I am trying to trim down my configuration files to avoid confusion. >=20 > If I were to setup something like this: 1 name node (192.168.0.1) , 1 > secondary name node (192.168.0.2), and 10 clients. The name node and > secondary namenode will not serve as a data node. >=20 > The clients will access thru a shared NFS configuration, core-site.xml > The datanode will only have, dfs.data.dir in hdfs-site.xml > The name node will have, dfs.name.dir in hdfs-site.xml > I am really not sure what I must do for my secondary name node. What > should I place there? >=20 > The idea is I want to reduce my configuration files. Any advise? Short Story: =20 You are fighting a losing battle. Throw in the towel now and plan on push= ing huge balls of configs. Work on a strategy for clients that are out of = sync. Longer Story: a) Any production Hadoop deployment should expect to have somewhere around= 3-4 different sets of configuration files if you configure even some of th= e intermediate features. [Hello separate audit logs!] b) You should expect to have all the config files for all the different se= rvices. The devs are just now starting to separate what needs what so hope= fully by 0.22 we won't have to have worry whether we have all of our bases = covered. Remember: if it isn't defined, it will use a default and therefor= e still work...just not the way you intend. c) Don't use NFS for pushing configuration files unless it is an HA-NFS co= nfiguration, full/redundant connectivity to every switch, etc. The first = time the NFS server falls out from underneath the grid, you're going to be = in a world of hurt. =09 We really need https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 to make t= his whole mess go away. Until it is nailed down which components need whic= h config vars, it is unlikely to either a) happen or b) work in a way that = is actually operable for any reasonable production deployment. From general-return-2175-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 17 02:19:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73386 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2010 02:19:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2010 02:19:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 63544 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2010 02:19:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63289 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2010 02:19:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63281 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2010 02:19:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 02:19:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 02:19:15 +0000 Received: by vws15 with SMTP id 15so1205099vws.35 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:18:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nl2UrxZB16BB2J3pMd+26DxxPrggbmOu9AlNxiNnjQk=; b=pex/S8PzFAE4eUMMbWToxczmT8qfGzgSVG5uu6aTQ40wBYOSTNomYVY6rtqgNuXtEY vGkm0ifNe9YnZhR3xvmrJ0iXpH4J6byFs1b/lb0Vb+7T5rWMWi+P0dd9q+58No+iPRvl NzY95IcGmn3n8OiWUe6NNIRkPv/nLLPeg48xA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=cIU03lfScRP+FrbaNc0Y3W1EXOU8UzOZGT2PvluDQHa8m6NQyYfW6u3ZPz4H9jjKR1 ItPUPWLsCGNqHnLnK+r7o+2xTLqbBX16ZMdvQ8tjUxI653K3hPR2xqa8YaWS48hMU+KT 2uDzJA7qHmkgOHd1wz/IhuPD/00JK5FYzrKOs= Received: by 10.220.203.12 with SMTP id fg12mr573338vcb.133.1287281934376; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:18:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.164.16 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:18:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: goutham patnaik Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:18:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: building mapreduce project on eclipse To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a1b86c9e510492c6aee2 --90e6ba53a1b86c9e510492c6aee2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Eli - that seemed to have worked Goutham On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Goutham, > > Add separate common, hdfs and mr projects to your workspace. Then for > the hdfs and mapreduce projects, select Build Path -> Configure Build > Path, in the Projects tab of the Java Build Path add dependencies on > the other projects. hdfs should depend on common, and mapreduce should > depend on hdfs and common. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, goutham patnaik > wrote: > > i checked out (from > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/mapreduce/trunk) the > > mapreduce project into eclipse. Following the instructions from the > hadoop > > screencast (http://vimeo.com/4193623) and the hadoop eclipse setup > > instructions (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment), i did > an > > ant build with the following targets selected - > > > > clean > > compile-mapred-test > > eclipse-files > > > > The ant build and the corresponding Build Project were successful, but > > eclipse still doesnt recognize classes / libraries from the hadoop-common > > project - which i also checked out and built (successfully). is there a > way > > to include the hadoop-common project inside the mapreduce project ? > > > > Also, im looking to contribute to the hadoop project in the near future - > do > > most committers out there checkout from and use eclipse for this ? or is > > there a more efficient way you've found to build your hadoop projects ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > Goutham > > > --90e6ba53a1b86c9e510492c6aee2-- From general-return-2176-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 22:18:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51947 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 22:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 22:18:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 35733 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35544 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:18:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35536 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 22:18:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:18:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amp@opendns.com designates 67.215.68.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.215.68.163] (HELO mail.opendns.com) (67.215.68.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:18:12 +0000 Received: from Adams-Desktop.local ([67.215.69.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.opendns.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id o9IMHoIo002256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:17:50 GMT Message-ID: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:17:50 -0700 From: Adam Phelps User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Checking current configuration values? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is there a means of looking up the current value of a configuration variable, in particular one that is not explicitly set in one of the .conf files? For instance if I wanted to find the value of "io.file.buffer.size" (just a random example) how would I go about it? Thanks - Adam Phelps From general-return-2177-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 22:22:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53832 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 22:22:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 22:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 41915 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:22:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41860 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41852 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 22:22:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:22:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:22:34 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so143039qyk.14 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.131.153 with SMTP id x25mr1552820qas.185.1287440532424; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:22:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.214.68 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:21:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> References: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:21:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Checking current configuration values? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022150473bf9ac7d60492eb9b47 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022150473bf9ac7d60492eb9b47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Trunk has a configuration servlet (/conf) that exposes configuration. I think it's in CDH3b3 (Cloudera's Distribution) as well. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6408 Cheers, -- Philip On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Adam Phelps wrote: > Is there a means of looking up the current value of a configuration > variable, in particular one that is not explicitly set in one of the .conf > files? > > For instance if I wanted to find the value of "io.file.buffer.size" (just a > random example) how would I go about it? > > Thanks > - Adam Phelps > --0022150473bf9ac7d60492eb9b47-- From general-return-2178-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 22:33:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56587 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 22:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 22:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 55771 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:33:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55673 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 22:33:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55665 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 22:33:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:33:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:33:05 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=hvKSfapyDNYftD8HNjAMHaKfT5V0aA37XvPh3gJsHd5+1VCgCS9W6FYc hCo7T1HBPziytDZEf/rDX0oRrSSGyL2K55qe9vkaTzUZSs5/rB0+PGeaN Ajy2NlRqRW6ofvZ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287441185; x=1318977185; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Checking=20current=20configuration=20va lues?|Date:=20Mon,=2018=20Oct=202010=2022:32:44=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<44473CABDF1733499B0CB90001BE9021@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20<4CBCC78E.4090 006@opendns.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=JuXT3dnajX2CIAdwDH60ylyLfeIOSVgaQAAihEfS5QA=; b=jBELZHM/NrB/AXpLJnoQySu2U3uGJvssxm0wtKIjO9YKzwt5EgaWyQ+L Ix9swUqlkDJMQsE/eY3vY80F6E57zm/LAtyRuHzAiCwZWYEPL+sHAuVGL fGqvNeW8AIW03YG; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,346,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="16181648" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:32:45 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Checking current configuration values? Thread-Topic: Checking current configuration values? Thread-Index: AQHLbxJgEcmlRVxMaU6nZeXGAKCkAZNHvO2AgAADCgA= Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:32:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <44473CABDF1733499B0CB90001BE9021@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 If you just want a quick visual inspection, you can use the jobconf.jsp by = clicking on the xml at the top of a job page in the jobtracker. On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: > Trunk has a configuration servlet (/conf) that exposes configuration. I > think it's in CDH3b3 (Cloudera's Distribution) as well. >=20 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6408 >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > -- Philip >=20 > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Adam Phelps wrote: >=20 >> Is there a means of looking up the current value of a configuration >> variable, in particular one that is not explicitly set in one of the .co= nf >> files? >>=20 >> For instance if I wanted to find the value of "io.file.buffer.size" (jus= t a >> random example) how would I go about it? >>=20 >> Thanks >> - Adam Phelps >>=20 From general-return-2179-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 07:33:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27625 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 07:33:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 07:33:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13212 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 07:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13027 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 07:33:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13017 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 07:33:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:33:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [188.40.108.78] (HELO mail.affinitas.de) (188.40.108.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:33:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.affinitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA73C0077B for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:37:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.affinitas.de Received: from mail.affinitas.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.affinitas.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxlyqB2IoEFL for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:37:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [91.102.12.2]) by mail.affinitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:37:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CBD49B9.4090304@affinitas.de> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:33:13 +0200 From: Martin Kuhn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Checking current configuration values? References: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> In-Reply-To: <4CBCC78E.4090006@opendns.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Is there a means of looking up the current value of a configuration > variable, in particular one that is not explicitly set in one of the > .conf files? http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.html#get%28java.lang.String%29 > For instance if I wanted to find the value of "io.file.buffer.size" > (just a random example) how would I go about it? public class MyApp extends Configured implements Tool { public int run(final String[] args) throws Exception { final Configuration conf = getConf(); ... final String property = conf.get("io.file.buffer.size"); ... } public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception { final int res = ToolRunner.run(new Configuration(), new MyApp(), args); System.exit(res); } } From general-return-2180-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 18:31:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72129 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 18:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 18:31:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 44511 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 18:31:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44307 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 18:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44297 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 18:31:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:31:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anil@kitenga.com designates 205.209.188.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.209.188.5] (HELO kitenga.com) (205.209.188.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:31:32 +0000 Received: from smlucid3lt (55.tensv.org [71.6.14.55] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by kitenga.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o9JIV60I001211 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:31:07 -0700 From: "Anil Uberoi" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Architecture Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:31:06 -0700 Message-ID: <001401cb6fbb$cc09e880$641db980$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Actq1i6+hc039LXzJkiOs5oPzinFPAE5W9Ig Content-Language: en-us Andre, Hope all is well. I 'd like to invite you to check out www.kitenga.com We'd be more than happy to help. Best regards, Anil ------------------------------------------------------------------ Anil Uberoi | CEO | Kitenga | Reinventing Information www.kitenga.com | 510.507.3399 -----Original Message----- From: a.reiter@web.de [mailto:a.reiter@web.de] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:57 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Architecture Hello everybody, i'm evaluating hadoop for a new platform. the application is a web based application, and the challange is to handle requests up to 1.000.000 times per second. this can actually be solved by load ballanced webservers. The problem now is to persist user data at real time. Let's say every request appends some data to the user record, i.e. 100 bytes are appended. The record would have an identifier placed in the cookie. The problem now is to look up the user record for every request at runtime. Is it possible to get the user record with the information about all former requests in a short time i.e. 50 ms ??? i hove no experience with hadoop yet every help would be very appreciated thanks in advance best regards andre From general-return-2181-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 21:13:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46252 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 21:13:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 21:13:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 69670 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69598 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69590 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:13:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:13:23 +0000 Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ljtd1f0050S2fkCADlD1JB; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:13:01 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LlCs1f00B2SbwD58VlCuDb; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:12:59 +0000 Message-Id: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:12:52 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. Hadoop is a project of the Apache Software Foundation. The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The foundation FAQ explains the operation and background of the foundation. Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If you are new to Apache development, please refer to the Incubator project for more information on how Apache projects operate. Roles and Responsibilities Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following sections * Users The most important participants in the project are people who use our software. The majority of our developers start out as users and guide their development efforts from the user's perspective. Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache community by helping other users on mailing lists and user support forums. * Contributors All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A contributor that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of such invitations depends on many factors. * Committers The project's Committers are responsible for the project's technical management. Committers have access to a specified set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion regarding that subproject. Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of active PMC members. All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software Foundation. There is a Committer FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for Committers A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, testing, etc. * Project Management Committee The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The responsibilities of the PMC include * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop project. In particular all releases must be approved by the PMC * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the codebase repository, mailing lists, websites. * Speaking on behalf of the project. * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project * Nominating new PMC members and committers * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC member is considered "emeritus" by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus member may request reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of the active PMC members. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to the board for the management of the projects within the scope of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on developments within the Hadoop project. When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision must be ratified by the Apache board. Decision Making Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require different forms of approval. For example, the previous section describes several decisions which require "lazy consensus" approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the types of approvals, and which types of decision require which type of approval. * Voting Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes may contain multiple items for approval and these should be clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the vote mail. Voting may take four flavours * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be performed." In general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not be able to help. * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in general, agree with the proposed action but is not concerned enough to prevent the action going ahead. * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes must contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a -1 vote to include an alternative course of action. All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to show their agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For technical decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. Non binding votes are still useful for those with binding votes to understand the perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For PMC decisions, only the votes of PMC members are binding. Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop codebase. These typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the commit message sent when the commit is made. * Approvals These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions require different types of approvals * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. * Vetoes A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, any action that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. * Actions This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and those who have binding votes over the action. * Code Change A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc. Lazy consensus of active committers. * Release Plan Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also nominates a Release Manager. Lazy majority of active committers * Product Release When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is required to accept the release as an official release of the project. Lazy Majority of active PMC members * Adoption of New Codebase When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to gain approval, the existing code base will continue. This also covers the creation of new sub-projects within the project Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members * New Committer When a new committer is proposed for the project Lazy consensus of active PMC members * New PMC Member When a committer is proposed for the PMC Lazy consensus of active PMC members * Committer Removal When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair Majority of active PMC members (excluding the committer in question if a member of the PMC). * PMC Member Removal When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair. Majority of active PMC members (excluding the member in question) * Modifying Bylaws Modifying this document. Majority of active PMC members * Voting Timeframes Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be made as timely as possible. From general-return-2182-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 21:36:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55968 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 1041 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:36:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 973 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 964 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:36:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:36:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:36:03 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1810414wyg.35 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.148 with SMTP id d20mr6808319wbv.117.1287524141424; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp ([38.104.141.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a17sm13168711wbe.0.2010.10.19.14.35.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:35:35 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop Message-ID: <20101019213535.GC2075@tp> References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Being a relatively new member of Hadoop community (just slightly over year and a half) and never been exposed to its politics I can't help but to wond= er if such document didn't exist before? If it did, then what's the difference between the current version and the previous one? What's causing that change to be introduced? If it didn't, then how Hadoop community has been governed beforehand? By the general ASF rules or differently? If the rules were the same for ASF and Hadoop why we need to deviate from them now and why? Clearly, having written bylaws is handy in case of a dispute. However it'd = be great to know the history (or just a story) of this particular discussion. Appreciate any information on the topic. Thanks in advance. Cos On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:12PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws >=20 > This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project > operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, > who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. >=20 > Hadoop is a project of the href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/">Apache Software > Foundation. The foundation holds the trademark on the name > "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code > including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html">foundation FAQ > explains the operation and background of the foundation. >=20 > Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set > of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If > you are new to Apache development, please refer to the href=3D"http://incubator.apache.org">Incubator project for more > information on how Apache projects operate. >=20 > Roles and Responsibilities >=20 > Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and > responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may > perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following > sections >=20 > * Users >=20 > The most important participants in the project are people who > use our software. The majority of our developers start out as > users and guide their development efforts from the user's > perspective. >=20 > Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback > to developers in the form of bug reports and feature > suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache > community by helping other users on mailing lists and user > support forums. >=20 > * Contributors >=20 > All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, > documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A > contributor > that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may > be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of > such invitations depends on many factors. >=20 > * Committers >=20 > The project's Committers are responsible for the project's > technical management. Committers have access to a specified > set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on > subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion > regarding that subproject. >=20 > Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is > considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not > contributing in any form to the project for over six > months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of > commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of active PMC members. >=20 > All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor > License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software > Foundation. There is a href=3D"http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html">Committer > FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for > Committers >=20 > A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project > may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of > contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code > review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, > testing, etc. >=20 > * Project Management Committee >=20 > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was > created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved > out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The > PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management > and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The > responsibilities of the PMC include >=20 > * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop > project. In particular all releases must be approved by the > PMC >=20 > * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the > codebase > repository, mailing lists, websites. >=20 > * Speaking on behalf of the project. >=20 > * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project >=20 > * Nominating new PMC members and committers >=20 > * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project >=20 > Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be > approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC > member is considered "emeritus" by their own > declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project > for over six months. An emeritus member may request > reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. >=20 > The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair > is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice > President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to > the board for the management of the projects within the scope > of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on > developments within the Hadoop project. >=20 > When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to > recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision > must be ratified by the Apache board. >=20 > Decision Making >=20 > Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require > different forms of approval. For example, the and Responsibilities">previous section describes several > decisions which require "lazy consensus" > approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the > types of approvals, and which types of decision require which > type of approval. >=20 > * Voting >=20 > Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the > primary project development mailing list > (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may > take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are > clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes > may contain multiple items for approval and these should be > clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the > vote mail. Voting may take four flavours >=20 > * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action > should be > performed." In general, this vote also indicates a > willingness > on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" >=20 > * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under > consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not > be able > to help. >=20 > * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in > general, agree with > the proposed action but is not concerned enough to > prevent the > action going ahead. >=20 > * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is > required, > this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes > must > contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. > Vetoes with > no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for > a -1 vote > to include an alternative course of action. >=20 > All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to > show their > agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For > technical > decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. > Non binding > votes are still useful for those with binding votes to > understand the > perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For > PMC decisions, > only the votes of PMC members are binding. >=20 > Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop > codebase. These > typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the > commit message > sent when the commit is made. >=20 > * Approvals >=20 > These are the types of approvals that can be sought. > Different actions > require different types of approvals >=20 > * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes > and no binding vetoes. >=20 > * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 > votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. >=20 > * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at > least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. >=20 > * Vetoes >=20 > A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, > it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the > reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, > can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does > not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that > the veto is valid. >=20 > If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person > casting > the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, > any action > that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. >=20 > * Actions >=20 > This section describes the various actions which are > undertaken within > the project, the corresponding approval required for that > action and > those who have binding votes over the action. >=20 > * Code Change >=20 > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed > by a committer. This includes source code, > documentation, website > content, etc. >=20 > Lazy consensus of active committers. >=20 > * Release Plan >=20 > Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The > plan also > nominates a Release Manager. >=20 > Lazy majority of active committers >=20 > * Product Release >=20 > When a release of one of the project's products is > ready, a vote is > required to accept the release as an official release of > the > project. >=20 > Lazy Majority of active PMC members >=20 > * Adoption of New Codebase >=20 > When the codebase for an existing, released product is > to be > replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote > fails to > gain approval, the existing code base will continue. >=20 > This also covers the creation of new sub-projects > within the project >=20 > Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members >=20 > * New Committer >=20 > When a new committer is proposed for the project >=20 > Lazy consensus of active PMC members >=20 > * New PMC Member >=20 > When a committer is proposed for the PMC >=20 > Lazy consensus of active PMC members >=20 > * Committer Removal >=20 > When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair >=20 > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the committer > in question if a > member of the PMC). >=20 > * PMC Member Removal >=20 > When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair. >=20 > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the member in > question) >=20 > * Modifying Bylaws >=20 > Modifying this document. >=20 > Majority of active PMC members >=20 > * Voting Timeframes >=20 > Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active > voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code > changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be > made as timely as possible. >=20 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky+DycACgkQIg9pgB8n5iKiqgCfSj59WPJe/GZ9PIEcCbMBOf15 N1kAn3+cXTvwAIpVIznExdfo2YlJg+uU =Vu5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From general-return-2183-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 21:40:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56756 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 21:40:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 21:40:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 5584 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5529 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5521 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:40:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:40:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.96] (HELO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:40:24 +0000 Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ldcw1f0031vN32cA9lg4mA; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:40:04 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-154-225.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Llfv1f0012VBGtd8ilfxTi; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:40:01 +0000 Message-Id: <1CDC6360-5991-4946-A3D9-0632AD214474@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20101019213535.GC2075@tp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:39:54 -0700 References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <20101019213535.GC2075@tp> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Being a relatively new member of Hadoop community (just slightly > over year > and a half) and never been exposed to its politics I can't help but > to wonder > if such document didn't exist before? No, it should have been done when we form as a TLP, but it wasn't done. -- Owen From general-return-2184-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 21:46:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57814 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13323 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:46:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13277 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13269 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:46:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:46:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:46:49 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so807211qyk.14 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:46:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.174.3 with SMTP id r3mr3917151qaz.260.1287524788162; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:46:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101019213535.GC2075@tp> References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <20101019213535.GC2075@tp> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:46:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Cos, There's some background in the proposal thread from last year. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/200911.mbox/%3C284E= 0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org%3E Thanks, Eli On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Being a relatively new member of Hadoop community (just slightly over yea= r > and a half) and never been exposed to its politics I can't help but to wo= nder > if such document didn't exist before? > > If it did, then what's the difference between the current version and the > previous one? What's causing that change to be introduced? > > If it didn't, then how Hadoop community has been governed beforehand? > By the general ASF rules or differently? If the rules were the same for A= SF > and Hadoop why we need to deviate from them now and why? > > Clearly, having written bylaws is handy in case of a dispute. However it'= d be > great to know the history (or just a story) of this particular discussion= . > > Appreciate any information on the topic. Thanks in advance. > =A0Cos > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:12PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws >> >> This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project >> operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, >> who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. >> >> Hadoop is a project of the > href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/">Apache Software >> Foundation. =A0The foundation holds the trademark on the name >> "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code >> including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The > href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html">foundation FAQ >> explains the operation and background of the foundation. >> >> Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set >> of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If >> you are new to Apache development, please refer to the > href=3D"http://incubator.apache.org">Incubator project for more >> information on how Apache projects operate. >> >> Roles and Responsibilities >> >> Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and >> responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may >> perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following >> sections >> >> =A0 =A0* Users >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 The most important participants in the project are peopl= e who >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 use our software. The majority of our developers start o= ut as >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 users and guide their development efforts from the user'= s >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 perspective. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feed= back >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 to developers in the form of bug reports and feature >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 community by helping other users on mailing lists and us= er >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 support forums. >> >> =A0 =A0* Contributors >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A >> contributor >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the proje= ct may >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timin= g of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 such invitations depends on many factors. >> >> =A0 =A0 * Committers >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The project's Committers are responsible for the project'= s >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 technical management. Committers have access to a specif= ied >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers = on >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical disc= ussion >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 regarding that subproject. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committer access is by invitation only and must be approv= ed by >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 contributing in any form to the project for over six >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement = of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subjec= t to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lazy consensus of active PMC members. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contribu= tor >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation. There is a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 href=3D"http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html">Commi= tter >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 FAQ which provides more details on the requirements = for >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committers >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the pro= ject >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form o= f >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 contribution is not limited to code. It can also include= code >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 review, helping out users on the mailing lists, document= ation, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 testing, etc. >> >> =A0 =A0* Project Management Committee >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop = was >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop = moved >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. = The >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the mana= gement >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibilities of the PMC include >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache = Hadoop >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 project. =A0In particular all releases must be approved = by the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 PMC >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including = the >> codebase >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 repository, mailing lists, websites. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Speaking on behalf of the project. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Resolving license disputes regarding products of the pr= oject >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Nominating new PMC members and committers >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the p= roject >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PM= C >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 member is considered "emeritus" by their own >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 declaration or by not contributing in any form to the pr= oject >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for over six months. An emeritus member may request >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject = to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lazy consensus of the active PMC members. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The c= hair >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (V= ice >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility= to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the board for the management of the projects within the = scope >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarte= rly on >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 developments within the Hadoop project. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision >> =A0 =A0 =A0 must be ratified by the Apache board. >> >> Decision Making >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions requ= ire >> =A0 =A0 =A0 different forms of approval. For example, the > =A0 =A0 =A0 and Responsibilities">previous section describes several >> =A0 =A0 =A0 decisions which require "lazy consensus" >> =A0 =A0 =A0 approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 types of approvals, and which types of decision require whic= h >> =A0 =A0 =A0 type of approval. >> >> =A0 =A0 * Voting >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 primary project development mailing list >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 (general@hadoop.apache.org). =A0Where necessary, PMC vot= ing may >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. =A0Vo= tes are >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. = =A0Votes >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 may contain multiple items for approval and these should= be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to = the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 vote mail. Voting may take four flavours >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the ac= tion >> should be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 performed." In general, this vote also indi= cates a >> willingness >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 on the behalf of the voter in "making it ha= ppen" >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action= under >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 consideration to go ahead. The voter, however wi= ll not >> be able >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 to help. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in >> general, agree with >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the proposed action but is not concerned enough = to >> prevent the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 action going ahead. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consen= sus is >> required, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 this vote counts as a veto. All= vetoes >> must >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 contain an explanation of why the veto is approp= riate. >> Vetoes with >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 no explanation are void. It may also be appropri= ate for >> a -1 vote >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 to include an alternative course of action. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to >> show their >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 agreement with or against a particular action by voting.= For >> technical >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 decisions, only the votes of active committers are bindi= ng. >> Non binding >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 votes are still useful for those with binding votes to >> understand the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. F= or >> PMC decisions, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 only the votes of PMC members are binding. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop >> codebase. These >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the >> commit message >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sent when the commit is made. >> >> =A0 =A0 * Approvals >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 These are the types of approvals that can be sought. >> Different actions >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 require different types of approvals >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 = votes >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and no binding vetoes. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 bin= ding +1 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires a= t >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 vo= tes. >> >> =A0 =A0 * Vetoes >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is = cast, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challen= ged, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This = does >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely= that >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the veto is valid. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the per= son >> casting >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdr= awn, >> any action >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner= . >> >> =A0 =A0 * Actions >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 This section describes the various actions which are >> undertaken within >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the project, the corresponding approval required for tha= t >> action and >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 those who have binding votes over the action. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Code Change >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 A change made to a codebase of the project and c= ommitted >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 by a committer. This includes source code, >> documentation, website >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 content, etc. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy consensus of active committers. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Release Plan >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Defines the timetable and actions for a release.= The >> plan also >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 nominates a Release Manager. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy majority of active committers >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Product Release >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When a release of one of the project's products = is >> ready, a vote is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 required to accept the release as an official re= lease of >> the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 project. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy Majority of active PMC members >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Adoption of New Codebase >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When the codebase for an existing, released prod= uct is >> to be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a= vote >> fails to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 gain approval, the existing code base will conti= nue. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This also covers the creation of new sub-projects >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 within the project >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * New Committer >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When a new committer is proposed for the project >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy consensus of active PMC members >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * New PMC Member >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When a committer is proposed for the PMC >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy consensus of active PMC members >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Committer Removal >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When removal of commit privileges is sought. =A0N= ote: Such >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0actions will also be referred to the ASF board by= the PMC >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0chair >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Majority of active PMC members (excluding the co= mmitter >> in question if a >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 member of the PMC). >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * PMC Member Removal >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When removal of a PMC member is sought. =A0Note:= Such >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 actions will also be referred to the ASF board b= y the PMC >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 chair. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Majority of active PMC members (excluding the me= mber in >> question) >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Modifying Bylaws >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Modifying this document. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Majority of active PMC members >> >> =A0 =A0* Voting Timeframes >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all activ= e >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should= be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 made as timely as possible. >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAky+DycACgkQIg9pgB8n5iKiqgCfSj59WPJe/GZ9PIEcCbMBOf15 > N1kAn3+cXTvwAIpVIznExdfo2YlJg+uU > =3DVu5R > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > From general-return-2185-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 21:47:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57920 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 21:47:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 21:47:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 14600 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:47:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14541 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 21:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14533 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:47:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:47:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:47:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 57800 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 21:46:46 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.103]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:46:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:46:45 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/19/2010 02:12 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > * Committer Removal > > When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair > > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the committer in question if a > member of the PMC). > > * PMC Member Removal > > When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair. > > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the member in question) With the exception of these two bullets, these bylaws seem equivalent to those posted by several other projects. Most projects use consensus-but-one for committer and PMC removal. Was this change intentional or accidental? Doug From general-return-2186-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 15:56:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29993 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 15:56:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 15:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 58434 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 15:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58345 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 15:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58336 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 15:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:56:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159191BA369 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:55:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id awBg1buJ1PZj for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:55:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7189F1BA5CD for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:55:57 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288194936.53823@TruYPxKisLNG6Rb1eyA7EA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9KFtaL6020568 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:55:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CBF10F8.6090107@apache.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:55:36 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9KFtaL6020568 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 19/10/10 22:12, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws > > This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project > operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, > who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. +1, looks like the standard ASF process That said -the JIRA/hudson review process isn't so common on other projects, where it's usually lazy post-commit-veto. That doesn't mean the Hadoop process is bad, only that you may want to say "the process used for getting code in is stricter than many existing ASF processes due to the value of data stored in Hadoop clusters. The exact process for committing code will be defined by the PMC and voted on" -then you can propose/vote the existing process, but have the ability to change things without reconstituting. -the proposal for big changes that was discussed may also be something that this would cover -Vetoes can kill a project. It's the situation you don't want to get, where someone starts -1 rejecting everything. It might be good to lay out what the escalation process is for resolving vetoes that cannot be resolved -is there a way to raise with the PMC, etc.? -steve > > Hadoop is a project of the href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/">Apache Software > Foundation. The foundation holds the trademark on the name > "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code > including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html">foundation FAQ > explains the operation and background of the foundation. > > Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set > of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If > you are new to Apache development, please refer to the href="http://incubator.apache.org">Incubator project for more > information on how Apache projects operate. > > Roles and Responsibilities > > Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and > responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may > perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following > sections > > * Users > > The most important participants in the project are people who > use our software. The majority of our developers start out as > users and guide their development efforts from the user's > perspective. > > Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback > to developers in the form of bug reports and feature > suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache > community by helping other users on mailing lists and user > support forums. > > * Contributors > > All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, > documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A contributor > that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may > be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of > such invitations depends on many factors. > > * Committers > > The project's Committers are responsible for the project's > technical management. Committers have access to a specified > set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on > subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion > regarding that subproject. > > Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is > considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not > contributing in any form to the project for over six > months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of > commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of active PMC members. > > All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor > License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software > Foundation. There is a href="http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html">Committer > FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for > Committers > > A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project > may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of > contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code > review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, > testing, etc. > > * Project Management Committee > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was > created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved > out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The > PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management > and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The > responsibilities of the PMC include > > * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop > project. In particular all releases must be approved by the > PMC > > * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the codebase > repository, mailing lists, websites. > > * Speaking on behalf of the project. > > * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project > > * Nominating new PMC members and committers > > * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project > > Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be > approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC > member is considered "emeritus" by their own > declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project > for over six months. An emeritus member may request > reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. > > The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair > is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice > President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to > the board for the management of the projects within the scope > of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on > developments within the Hadoop project. > > When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to > recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision > must be ratified by the Apache board. > > Decision Making > > Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require > different forms of approval. For example, the previous section describes several > decisions which require "lazy consensus" > approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the > types of approvals, and which types of decision require which > type of approval. > > * Voting > > Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the > primary project development mailing list > (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may > take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are > clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes > may contain multiple items for approval and these should be > clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the > vote mail. Voting may take four flavours > > * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be > performed." In general, this vote also indicates a willingness > on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" > > * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under > consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not be able > to help. > > * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in general, agree with > the proposed action but is not concerned enough to prevent the > action going ahead. > > * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, > this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes must > contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with > no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a -1 vote > to include an alternative course of action. > > All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to show their > agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For technical > decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. Non binding > votes are still useful for those with binding votes to understand the > perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For PMC decisions, > only the votes of PMC members are binding. > > Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop codebase. These > typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the commit message > sent when the commit is made. > > * Approvals > > These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions > require different types of approvals > > * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes > and no binding vetoes. > > * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 > votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at > least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. > > * Vetoes > > A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, > it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the > reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, > can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does > not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that > the veto is valid. > > If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting > the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, any action > that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. > > * Actions > > This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within > the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and > those who have binding votes over the action. > > * Code Change > > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website > content, etc. > > Lazy consensus of active committers. > > * Release Plan > > Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also > nominates a Release Manager. > > Lazy majority of active committers > > * Product Release > > When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is > required to accept the release as an official release of the > project. > > Lazy Majority of active PMC members > > * Adoption of New Codebase > > When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be > replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to > gain approval, the existing code base will continue. > > This also covers the creation of new sub-projects > within the project > > Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members > > * New Committer > > When a new committer is proposed for the project > > Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > * New PMC Member > > When a committer is proposed for the PMC > > Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > * Committer Removal > > When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair > > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the committer in question if a > member of the PMC). > > * PMC Member Removal > > When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair. > > Majority of active PMC members (excluding the member in question) > > * Modifying Bylaws > > Modifying this document. > > Majority of active PMC members > > * Voting Timeframes > > Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active > voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code > changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be > made as timely as possible. > From general-return-2187-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 16:54:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51274 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 16:54:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 16:54:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 60731 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 16:54:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60626 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 16:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60618 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 16:54:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:54:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.211] (HELO qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:54:35 +0000 Received: from omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id M0Zk1f0021afHeLAB4uEBU; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:54:14 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id M4u51f00D2SbwD58d4u8Ue; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:54:12 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-48800315 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:54:05 -0700 References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-5-48800315 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > With the exception of these two bullets, these bylaws seem > equivalent to those posted by several other projects. Most projects > use consensus-but-one for committer and PMC removal. Was this > change intentional or accidental? It was intentional. In my survey of other Apache project's bylaws, I was originally surprised to find some such as HTTP Components (http://hc.apache.org/bylaws.html ) that use majority votes for removing people. However, the question is whether a small minority should be able to drain a project's attention and energy. For anyone who hasn't already seen it, there is an outstanding presentation on "Open Source Projects and Poisonous People" that was done by Brian Fitzpatrick and Ben Collins-Sussman. I'd highly recommend it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSFDm3UYkeE. The presentation's central thesis is that a project's attention and energy are its most valuable resource. People that cause long emotional debates without contributing to the project are extremely destructive to the project and must occasionally be asked to leave. Of course everyone hopes to avoid these cases, but the question is whether the project should have the mechanism to fix itself. I feel that it must. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-5-48800315-- From general-return-2188-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 17:15:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64117 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 17:15:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 17:15:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 97912 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 17:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97860 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 17:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97852 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 17:15:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:15:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:15:38 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAL001AOMKO7G90@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-20_08:2010-10-20,2010-10-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010200090 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:14:48 -0700 Message-id: <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 20, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> With the exception of these two bullets, these bylaws seem equivalent to those posted by several other projects. Most projects use consensus-but-one for committer and PMC removal. Was this change intentional or accidental? > > It was intentional. In my survey of other Apache project's bylaws, I was originally surprised to find some such as HTTP Components (http://hc.apache.org/bylaws.html) that use majority votes for removing people. However, the question is whether a small minority should be able to drain a project's attention and energy. > > For anyone who hasn't already seen it, there is an outstanding presentation on "Open Source Projects and Poisonous People" that was done by Brian Fitzpatrick and Ben Collins-Sussman. I'd highly recommend it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSFDm3UYkeE. The presentation's central thesis is that a project's attention and energy are its most valuable resource. People that cause long emotional debates without contributing to the project are extremely destructive to the project and must occasionally be asked to leave. > > Of course everyone hopes to avoid these cases, but the question is whether the project should have the mechanism to fix itself. I feel that it must. FWIW, "PMC does not generally operate by majority but by consensus." was given as a rationale when explaining to an existing PMC member why it was ok to approve so many new PMC members from a single company. Nige From general-return-2189-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 19:48:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26408 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 19:48:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 19:48:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 68385 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:48:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68328 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68320 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 19:48:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:48:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:48:07 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAL00ACGTMRXF60@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:47:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010200111 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-20_08:2010-10-20,2010-10-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Patch testing Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:47:15 -0700 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks, I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me know. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2190-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 19:53:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28048 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 19:53:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 19:53:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 82449 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:53:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82389 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82381 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 19:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:53:20 +0000 Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so2770648qwg.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:52:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.49.72 with SMTP id u8mr5059956qaf.9.1287604379813; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:52:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.193 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:52:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Myers Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:52:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e7c404ab94fb049311c1a1 --001485e7c404ab94fb049311c1a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 There have been several tests failing on trunk for entirely too long, and I believe this will help prevent further regressions while we address those issues. Thanks a lot for volunteering to do this work, Nigel. Aaron On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, > HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from > day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I > want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit > testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me > know. > > Cheers, > Nige > --001485e7c404ab94fb049311c1a1-- From general-return-2191-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 19:54:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28351 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 19:54:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 19:54:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 86240 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:54:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86175 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 19:54:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86167 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 19:54:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:54:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:54:48 +0000 Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so2137915gwb.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.251.4 with SMTP id d4mr1388422mus.131.1287604465627; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k4sm388450faa.8.2010.10.20.12.54.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:54:20 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch testing Message-ID: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="//IivP0gvsAy3Can" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --//IivP0gvsAy3Can Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows to ke= ep weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. There were at least two slightly different sources of information about wha= t's going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about the situation so comments can be more substantial? Thanks, Cos On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks,=20 >=20 > I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, > HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from > day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I > want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit > testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me > know. =20 >=20 > Cheers, > Nige --//IivP0gvsAy3Can Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky/SOwACgkQIg9pgB8n5iJn3gCfUrUvlP+lvELkEgKAjACytwJU cCQAn0SO7c+pE3I6msad866NFcTmRH1D =AvyQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --//IivP0gvsAy3Can-- From general-return-2192-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:19:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39774 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:19:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:19:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 32685 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:19:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32646 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32638 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:19:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:19:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:18:52 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9KKHjNo013255 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:17:44 -0700 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:17:42 -0700 Subject: Re: Patch testing Thread-Topic: Patch testing Thread-Index: Actwk9tpjvwOWloSQUyPNAqCo7QFtg== Message-ID: <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> In-Reply-To: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Old times: The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine hudson= .zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira and cr= eate the patch queue for testing. Current situation:=20 hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new machi= ne called aegis.apache.org as the master machine.=20 This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch queue.= Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the new a= egis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin job o= n the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. =20 Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Instead = they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. =20 I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.grid.sp= 2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. =20 The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule buil= ds. Longterm solution:=20 email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term solut= ion we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly from j= ira.=20 And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart from= the current status called "patch-available" Thanks, Giri On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows to = keep > weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. >=20 > There were at least two slightly different sources of information about w= hat's > going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about th= e > situation so comments can be more substantial? >=20 > Thanks, > Cos >=20 > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> Folks,=20 >>=20 >> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, >> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus fro= m >> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), = I >> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit >> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me >> know. =20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige From general-return-2193-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:24:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41411 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:24:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:24:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 47196 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47155 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47147 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:24:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.96] (HELO qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:24:00 +0000 Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LzSB1f0070ldTLk598PgzQ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:23:40 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id M8PW1f00B2SbwD53Q8PZt7; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:23:38 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:23:29 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for > HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. That would be great, Nigel. Thanks, Owen From general-return-2194-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:28:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42242 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:28:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:28:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 54228 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:28:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54124 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:28:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54116 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:28:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:28:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:28:25 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9KKRrhn087227 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:27:53 -0700 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:27:51 -0700 Subject: Re: Patch testing Thread-Topic: Patch testing Thread-Index: ActwlPfdtcX18DVET92IT55U0GbJWwAAEyES Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Great.=20 Nigel,=20 Can you please document in somewhere on how you fixed it? We=B9d like to f= ix it for ZooKeeper as well. Thanks mahadev On 10/20/10 1:23 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for >> HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. >=20 > That would be great, Nigel. >=20 > Thanks, > Owen >=20 From general-return-2195-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:31:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42947 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:31:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:31:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 58186 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:31:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58017 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58009 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:31:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:31:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:31:28 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAL000LAVMP3Q10@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:30:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010200120 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-20_08:2010-10-20,2010-10-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:30:25 -0700 Message-id: <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Giri. > Longterm solution: > email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly from jira. Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine. Any open Jira's for this work? If not, I'll open one. > And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart from the current status called "patch-available" Not sure that's necessary. I think if we change the patch testing model a little, we can keep the current workflow. Also, given some recent advances in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin job covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able to drastically improve utilization of the slaves we have. Let's move this discussion to a ticket. LMK if I need to open one. Cheers, Nige On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > > Old times: > The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine hudson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira and create the patch queue for testing. > > Current situation: > hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new machine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine. > > This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch queue. > Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the new aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin job on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. > > Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Instead they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. > > I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. > > The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule builds. > > Longterm solution: > email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly from jira. > And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart from the current status called "patch-available" > > Thanks, > Giri > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows to keep >> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. >> >> There were at least two slightly different sources of information about what's >> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about the >> situation so comments can be more substantial? >> >> Thanks, >> Cos >> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, >>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from >>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I >>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit >>> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me >>> know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige > From general-return-2196-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:32:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43127 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 59745 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59667 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59659 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:32:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:31:58 +0000 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so3257337fxm.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.171.9 with SMTP id y9mr1921258muo.40.1287606697171; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm413740fah.30.2010.10.20.13.31.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:31 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch testing Message-ID: <20101020203131.GA17884@tp> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Giri! I'm totally agree that we need to move away from the email triggering.=20 And in order to make changes to JIRA's workflow someone needs to work with INFRA folks or a person with admin access should suffice?=20 I'm offering my help for either way, so lemme know. Cos On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:17PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >=20 > Old times: > The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine > hudson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira > and create the patch queue for testing. >=20 > Current situation:=20 > hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new > machine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine.=20 >=20 > This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch queu= e. > Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the new > aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin job > on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. =20 >=20 > Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Instead > they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. =20 >=20 > I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave > h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. =20 >=20 > The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule > builds. >=20 > Longterm solution:=20 > email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term > solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly > from jira. And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in ji= ra. > Apart from the current status called "patch-available" >=20 > Thanks, > Giri >=20 > On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >=20 > > Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows t= o keep > > weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. > >=20 > > There were at least two slightly different sources of information about= what's > > going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about = the > > situation so comments can be more substantial? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Cos > >=20 > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Folks,=20 > >>=20 > >> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, > >> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus f= rom > >> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job)= , I > >> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit > >> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me > >> know. =20 > >>=20 > >> Cheers, > >> Nige >=20 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky/UaMACgkQIg9pgB8n5iLwqwCgk5Voh3Cyyq8CGNAgvVtezlsQ ERsAn1aQpQdO30aBH5Fmg5g02QwjpfDh =ssWS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From general-return-2197-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:32:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43259 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:32:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 61029 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60982 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60974 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:32:21 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAL00HG7VPA2S40@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010200120 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-20_08:2010-10-20,2010-10-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:31:57 -0700 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <0C437F3B-1577-49E1-9C6A-7D4AA53ED9D9@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think ZK, PIG, etc will also be included in the update I'm working on. Cheers, Nige On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Great.=20 >=20 > Nigel,=20 > Can you please document in somewhere on how you fixed it? We=B9d like = to fix > it for ZooKeeper as well. >=20 > Thanks > mahadev >=20 >=20 > On 10/20/10 1:23 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for >>> HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. >>=20 >> That would be great, Nigel. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Owen >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2198-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:38:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44820 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:38:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 70227 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70175 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70167 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:38:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:38:06 +0000 Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so2814333qwg.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.3.137 with SMTP id 9mr2756071qan.142.1287607065401; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:37:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.193 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:37:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Myers Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:37:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517510c4cbe59e80493126193 --001517510c4cbe59e80493126193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 One feature request, which may be difficult to implement, and may not be worth it: It would be nice to somehow support running tests for patches which require changes that span core/MR/HDFS. As it stands, I believe an HDFS patch will be built and run against a trunk jar, but if this HDFS patch requires some not-yet-committed work that's being done in a HADOOP JIRA, the HDFS tests will fail. Obviously, just getting hudson QA running again is a necessary pre-requisite for this. :) Aaron --001517510c4cbe59e80493126193-- From general-return-2199-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:56:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65375 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:56:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7279 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:56:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7213 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:56:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7205 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:56:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:56:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:56:43 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9KKu1Tm097903 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:56:01 -0700 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:55:57 -0700 Subject: Re: Patch testing Thread-Topic: Patch testing Thread-Index: ActwmTO1OsXh6BaaTsuN7U3w0XQSIw== Message-ID: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I ve just filed this jira for discussions about patch-testing. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 Thanks, -Giri On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Thanks Giri. >=20 >> Longterm solution:=20 >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term so= lution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly fro= m jira.=20 >=20 > Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine. Any open Jira's f= or this work? If not, I'll open one. >=20 >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart f= rom the current status called "patch-available" >=20 > Not sure that's necessary. I think if we change the patch testing model = a little, we can keep the current workflow. Also, given some recent advanc= es in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin job = covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able to d= rastically improve utilization of the slaves we have. Let's move this disc= ussion to a ticket. LMK if I need to open one. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> Old times: >> The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine hud= son.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira and= create the patch queue for testing. >>=20 >> Current situation:=20 >> hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new ma= chine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine.=20 >>=20 >> This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch que= ue. >> Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the ne= w aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin jo= b on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. =20 >>=20 >> Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Inste= ad they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. =20 >>=20 >> I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.grid= .sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. =20 >>=20 >> The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule b= uilds. >>=20 >> Longterm solution:=20 >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term so= lution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly fro= m jira.=20 >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart f= rom the current status called "patch-available" >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Giri >>=20 >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>=20 >>> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows t= o keep >>> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. >>>=20 >>> There were at least two slightly different sources of information about= what's >>> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about = the >>> situation so comments can be more substantial? >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> Cos >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> Folks,=20 >>>>=20 >>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS= , >>>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus f= rom >>>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job)= , I >>>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit >>>> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let m= e >>>> know. =20 >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2200-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 21:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73192 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 21:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 27364 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27291 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27283 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:13:32 +0000 Received: by ywj3 with SMTP id 3so158659ywj.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7WTj9ZsQbRzQL/LgXQMhmK+billWfLyP8Rn3c70htb0=; b=qGHsKiwDrlpUa+e3gCNfeA2Q3ABuLa4gnQ344TMstNGsSzgrIClRLiAfFr+qIueWU4 qiUvpMYiC/T+uCJk5EVD+FjHsd+2tXBLppcR+QFcf8zyBMS033Pmbm+LgRXw2zjc8wzd iTUVBiotxGa679XXIRAsF2xXqnZLfn4+Pe97s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Utqy7f1BT9Mb1q7A0FCm4BJwgIz2xbjPVNa/ylnirAIHq1Oc3KpCJ4fme0Z1YpGwcv kTcvkhd707400UiksoH2slFZl/BwD3xQdgODK+ROnot6Hf+v6Vq8KXsJ5lFB+sPYw39H rB8Rg5BuAyrLmyMNhHWYJT24z8eyKB6RE7SIQ= Received: by 10.42.208.205 with SMTP id gd13mr5757124icb.308.1287609190726; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.70.147 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:12:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:12:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the explanation Owen. The HttpComponents bylaws define "majority" as "A majority decision passes if there is a minimum of three binding +1 votes and at least 75% of the binding votes are +1." So this is not the same as the 50% majority defined the the draft. (Actually, I notice that only "lazy majority" is defined, not "majority" in the approvals section.) I suggest we make this stronger. By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig (http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example. Also, Pig has a minimum length of time for each action, rather than the same fixed number for each. Might be worth considering. Cheers, Tom On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> With the exception of these two bullets, these bylaws seem equivalent to >> those posted by several other projects. =A0Most projects use consensus-b= ut-one >> for committer and PMC removal. =A0Was this change intentional or acciden= tal? > > It was intentional. In my survey of other Apache project's bylaws, I was > originally surprised to find some such as HTTP Components > (http://hc.apache.org/bylaws.html) that use majority votes for removing > people. However, the question is whether a small minority should be able = to > drain a project's attention and energy. > > For anyone who hasn't already seen it, there is an outstanding presentati= on > on "Open Source Projects and Poisonous People" that was done by Brian > Fitzpatrick and Ben Collins-Sussman. I'd highly recommend it. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DZSFDm3UYkeE. The presentation's central > thesis is that a project's attention and energy are its most valuable > resource. People that cause long emotional debates without contributing t= o > the project are extremely destructive to the project and must occasionall= y > be asked to leave. > > Of course everyone hopes to avoid these cases, but the question is whethe= r > the project should have the mechanism to fix itself. I feel that it must. > > -- Owen From general-return-2201-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 21:13:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73295 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 21:13:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 28608 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28562 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28554 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 21:13:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:13:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:13:38 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3380861bwz.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.181.15 with SMTP id i15mr6202636mup.16.1287609196316; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm438168fak.22.2010.10.20.14.13.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:13:10 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch testing Message-ID: <20101020211310.GB17884@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Actually, there's a way to do it, but is isn't simple as you said and requi= re certain JIRA management discipline like linking JIRAs properly, for instanc= e. Another veritable here is to submit patches for all involved project at onc= e or to be able to postpone a patch validation if patch-A isn't available when patch-B is submitted (project B depends on A, obviously). After that everything else is real easy: build dependencies, mvn-install artifacts, build the dependent one with locally installed artifacts, clean = mvn cache after all. The tricky part though is to guarantee that these chained builds are executed on the same machine. Otherwise, local mvn repo synchronization will be one huge mess ;) So, in other words, let's restore the status quo first ;) IMO Cos On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:37PM, Aaron Myers wrote: > One feature request, which may be difficult to implement, and may not be > worth it: >=20 > It would be nice to somehow support running tests for patches which requi= re > changes that span core/MR/HDFS. As it stands, I believe an HDFS patch will > be built and run against a trunk jar, but if this HDFS patch requires some > not-yet-committed work that's being done in a HADOOP JIRA, the HDFS tests > will fail. >=20 > Obviously, just getting hudson QA running again is a necessary pre-requis= ite > for this. :) >=20 > Aaron --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky/W2YACgkQIg9pgB8n5iKlwwCfXAMBk3ke6W5NQ/Giu1rOYpe6 u5kAn1GzDowSUemOpVFSUTvPPk0TGvwa =Tncj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl-- From general-return-2202-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 21:21:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76860 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 21:21:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 21:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 44396 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44221 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44213 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 21:21:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:21:36 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so3216116wwb.29 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S6RN5NqLfUhgoyBY8SWh8++mGBAHjzZ1b0EN3hZGW24=; b=nXoMLoNxsvE2ElODj4f55N2Rq+Nre30wwomtwvguszKWkkon4t6mrlggDE5z8bVptR hc20B2wzRK7O2cnr6SReyLf/f4/+B2sNS3rht70+t9obxSji3gD04SreFLbYQGTHeWNF +WsYgL/vqv2u16H7iIHeBPnq8Iv4vRRXK2Dkk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T0TcNGtsueEDybbI1nUaqD7y7CDJSek2RNXmP3egTqYxUS4mziirEQeaFL/KsTXqwR LcOtxnhty3kf53difKquwI2OFaam4g9aDPP1x1gi/pYBcs2aImhsN1cHrX+qx8Q6Pox1 Q5GnWFxa6IBZIjfWmVOSAN5JkuU3GnhjpNAew= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.152.9 with SMTP id e9mr102411wbw.169.1287609676310; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.183.85 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:21:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6cbfc5da703049312fdea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6cbfc5da703049312fdea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Awesome Nigel! That will be of real help. thanks, dhruba On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, > HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from > day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I > want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit > testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me > know. > > Cheers, > Nige > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --001485f6cbfc5da703049312fdea-- From general-return-2203-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 21:46:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83315 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 76906 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:46:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76654 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 21:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76639 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 21:46:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:46:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:46:39 +0000 Received: by qwg8 with SMTP id 8so2895069qwg.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:46:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.205 with SMTP id c13mr2674069qab.90.1287611178382; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:46:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:46:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes! Thanks Nigel. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, H= ADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. =A0Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from = day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I w= ant to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit testin= g useful. =A0Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. =A0Let me know. > > Cheers, > Nige > From general-return-2204-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 22:16:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97071 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 22:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 22:16:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 16192 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 22:16:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16140 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 22:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16132 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 22:16:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:16:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:16:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 96906 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 22:15:40 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:15:40 +0000 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1440137yxn.35 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:15:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.1.6 with SMTP id 6mr3202945ice.100.1287612937085; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.148.7 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:15:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:15:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > FWIW, "PMC does not generally operate by majority but by consensus." was given as a rationale when explaining to an existing PMC member why it was ok to approve so many new PMC members from a single company. FWIW, working at the same company doesn't imbue contributors with a shared agenda, neither does it rob them of their ability to compromise, relieve their concern for the project's health, nor does it diminish their respect for other contributors. If individuals from that company display any of those traits, then the PMC should address them. Equating association and collusion a priori is inadmissible. And insulting. On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tom White wrote: > I suggest we make this stronger. > By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig > (http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example. Consensus is equivalent to making the PMC a permanent appointment. Discussions would be more civil and more likely to offer compromise- we would actually work toward consensus- if intransigence and hostility had consequences. Removing people is a last resort. Moving the barrier closer doesn't make it more likely, but it aligns incentives so rational people will reign in their more intemperate comments and, instead, find ways to make progress. Many projects require supermajorities or even 3/4 majorities. It's sufficiently damning if more than half the PMC thinks an individual is so destructive that less damage would be done by ejecting them, in my opinion, but again: this is not a facility we should use, or have to use. Throwing someone out is an expensive failure for the project, and an conspicuous failure of its governance and community. Personally, I don't care if it's a majority or a supermajority, but consensus is a fig leaf. > Also, Pig has a minimum length of time for each action, rather than > the same fixed number for each. Might be worth considering. IIRC, the reasoning for a full week in the last thread was to prevent national holidays from affecting the definition of "working days." We might expedite votes for security/patch releases. -C From general-return-2205-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 22:42:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5346 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 22:42:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 22:42:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 41835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 22:41:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41756 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 22:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41747 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 22:41:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:41:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.6] (HELO jor-el.real.com) (207.188.23.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:41:53 +0000 Received: from seacas02.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.57]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by jor-el.real.com with esmtp; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:41:32 -0700 id 00094022.4CBF701C.00004FF7 Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas02.corp.real.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:41:32 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:41:31 -0700 Subject: Limiting concurrent maps Thread-Topic: Limiting concurrent maps Thread-Index: Actwp/Fb/Y5FxTcKSeujJFhFELqJlg== Message-ID: <8AE653F8-6EA6-4D50-A7B2-CA1B0CC75649@real.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I have been playing with mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum to reduce = the load on my Cassandra cluster (using the Cassandra ColumnFamilyInputFormat). I'd= like to find ways of throttling the map operations in the case I may be affecting OLTP activity on the cluster. What parameters can I use to limit the number of map tasks running concurre= ntly across the whole cluster? mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=20 limits the number of concurrent maps per task tracker. But can i do this a= t the job level?=20 Should I look at the "fair" scheduler? regards,Michael= From general-return-2206-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 23:33:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19987 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 23:33:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 23:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 94428 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 23:33:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94353 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 23:33:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94345 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 23:33:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:33:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown ip:63.236.97.88 (nike.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of james@rockyou.com) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:33:26 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so3325850wwb.29 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.137.71 with SMTP id v7mr234637wbt.149.1287617586380; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:33:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.154.78 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:32:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8AE653F8-6EA6-4D50-A7B2-CA1B0CC75649@real.com> References: <8AE653F8-6EA6-4D50-A7B2-CA1B0CC75649@real.com> From: james warren Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:32:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Limiting concurrent maps To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f8dad7bf67049314d4fa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e659f8dad7bf67049314d4fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Michael, Any of the tasktracker configs affect the local tasktracker daemon and not other servers in your cluster. Moreover, they can't be overridden by a job configuration. Sounds like you're in need of a job scheduler; I personally prefer use the Fair Scheduler but I'm sure the Capacity Scheduler would suit your needs as well. cheers, -James On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > I have been playing with mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum to reduce > the load > on my Cassandra cluster (using the Cassandra ColumnFamilyInputFormat). I'd > like to find ways of throttling the map operations > in the case I may be affecting OLTP activity on the cluster. > > What parameters can I use to limit the number of map tasks running > concurrently across the whole cluster? > mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum > limits the number of concurrent maps per task tracker. But can i do this > at the job level? > > Should I look at the "fair" scheduler? > > regards,Michael --0016e659f8dad7bf67049314d4fa-- From general-return-2207-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 17:11:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76385 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 17:11:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 17:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 15868 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 17:11:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15611 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15594 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 17:11:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:11:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:11:10 +0000 Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so2091848yxn.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:10:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=RJca5fyRhoSadSmxYYTvyu3pb+MYygc0KrEPwscIXcg=; b=tlHHdkvPnPzuhGaBdsJig0N7zbfYJpNG1gMORyEZ2UreuMe7OduRXheEXEbVvwH/7N SdqgUfce+X69FOfAv237BW9iPE9TWYLLaJHIdAfqw/AFCehPA9d2b1N7gA/8k7L7DYF5 vXpUWNgB4FZW5zzWX1jFGWjqzSMjGqPm11R4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Gruc8ipOYB8hoBIf6/0uBvhmxM1QzF16NuNOfmK9P/U6gRwW3g+Ts43yiecDzGlMN+ o6v7b85v5h4ZmT2BHgdry0QiqL+7HGQBSqkXF43DeaDxP1LAu2TXMdtOYgteD4UgZdLv Z1gCJmBOKvk2ns0MIAgUdV7EOSlLgc+DwsF/c= Received: by 10.239.190.134 with SMTP id x6mr372433hbh.70.1287681048083; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:10:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.70.147 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:10:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> From: Tom White Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:10:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> FWIW, "PMC does not generally operate by majority but by consensus." was given as a rationale when explaining to an existing PMC member why it was ok to approve so many new PMC members from a single company. > > FWIW, working at the same company doesn't imbue contributors with a > shared agenda, neither does it rob them of their ability to > compromise, relieve their concern for the project's health, nor does > it diminish their respect for other contributors. If individuals from > that company display any of those traits, then the PMC should address > them. Equating association and collusion a priori is inadmissible. And > insulting. > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tom White wrote: >> I suggest we make this stronger. >> By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig >> (http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example. > > Consensus is equivalent to making the PMC a permanent appointment. > Discussions would be more civil and more likely to offer compromise- > we would actually work toward consensus- if intransigence and > hostility had consequences. Removing people is a last resort. Moving > the barrier closer doesn't make it more likely, but it aligns > incentives so rational people will reign in their more intemperate > comments and, instead, find ways to make progress. > > Many projects require supermajorities or even 3/4 majorities. It's > sufficiently damning if more than half the PMC thinks an individual is > so destructive that less damage would be done by ejecting them, in my > opinion, but again: this is not a facility we should use, or have to > use. Throwing someone out is an expensive failure for the project, and > an conspicuous failure of its governance and community. Personally, I > don't care if it's a majority or a supermajority, but consensus is a > fig leaf. Fair point. For a large PMC, that's probably true. This matter was discussed on the Pig list, and there was a range of opinion there: http://search-hadoop.com/m/jk35b2tZCuy&subj=RE+DISCUSS+Apache+Pig+bylaws. Personally, I think a supermajority strikes the right balance. Tom > >> Also, Pig has a minimum length of time for each action, rather than >> the same fixed number for each. Might be worth considering. > > IIRC, the reasoning for a full week in the last thread was to prevent > national holidays from affecting the definition of "working days." We > might expedite votes for security/patch releases. -C > From general-return-2208-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:13:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36875 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:13:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:13:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 27358 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27304 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27296 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:13:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:13:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:13:37 +0000 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so70852wwb.29 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.153.14 with SMTP id i14mr1600180wbw.142.1287688396049; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:13:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9f826d96b104932551ae X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b9f826d96b104932551ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi guys. I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the cloudera + yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, and what would be required. --0016363b9f826d96b104932551ae-- From general-return-2209-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:30:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43196 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:30:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:30:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 60807 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:30:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60757 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60749 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:30:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:30:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:30:45 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=j/7GijcjSs4UEb+KXZQfzTJQ4poURGA31+3/sejZCRgl/1nZyZCgHcLd ePfDHst2BdWrg63qGz15shsjQvrikf6S99qalAx1xyh2RZ3aLlO9t5SOU 0umB79NZ2e4fgcf; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287689444; x=1319225444; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20bringing=20the=20codebases=20back=20in =20line|Date:=20Thu,=2021=20Oct=202010=2019:30:23=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<0B850FE2A152BF429ED5FABC8EFFBB2C@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=oki8y0fjwZT9ZHMa8cfW/BowFyRd4lEWGd0QXL/NaDM=; b=EXLMEQ/d2uogfPVaSRXoXamM+fbU8rUmFQDLCxJOOxkCX0dbCUIgJQhF 8CFGRkpqbGLD3AvCBD4BTKW/nSX7n9VtsX4Q33/xXuQX+FzFiwVKCir5I 9HVzvyNeVDE6N5q; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,219,1286175600"; d="scan'208";a="15855466" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:30:24 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: AQHLcVQVuqCpAAO/eUm8zw+IHmCpg5NMP34A Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:30:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <0B850FE2A152BF429ED5FABC8EFFBB2C@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi guys. >=20 > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the clouder= a + > yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, > and what would be required. *grabs popcorn* From general-return-2210-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 20:00:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59329 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 20:00:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 20:00:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30262 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 20:00:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30036 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 20:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30028 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 20:00:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.17] (HELO qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:33 +0000 Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MVAB1f00A0vp7WLAAY0BiY; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:11 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MY011f00B2SbwD58RY04gA; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:00:09 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:00:01 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the > cloudera + > yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, > and what would be required. All of the patches that are the "yahoo distribution of hadoop" have been in Apache's trunk for months. -- Owen From general-return-2211-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 21:01:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91441 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 21:01:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 21:01:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 46001 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45784 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45776 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 21:00:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:00:53 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so47639wyg.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.210 with SMTP id y18mr1797234wbw.63.1287694831469; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:00:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:00:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a01f602661d049326d16d --0016e65a01f602661d049326d16d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 so what do you think is required to get them into a release? On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the cloudera >> + >> yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, >> and what would be required. >> > > All of the patches that are the "yahoo distribution of hadoop" have been in > Apache's trunk for months. > > -- Owen > --0016e65a01f602661d049326d16d-- From general-return-2212-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 21:42:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20592 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 21:42:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 21:42:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 13582 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:42:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13536 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13528 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 21:42:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:42:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.211] (HELO qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:41:57 +0000 Received: from omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MQNh1f0090QkzPwABZhcKM; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:41:36 +0000 Received: from [172.21.154.225] ([209.131.62.146]) by omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MZhT1f00F39K7Mt8NZhWYw; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:41:34 +0000 Message-Id: <5A40C123-83C3-4F64-91E8-2C93FB6C053C@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:41:26 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > so what do you think is required to get them into a release? I'd planned to start making a release next month. -- Owen From general-return-2213-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 21:54:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30189 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 21:54:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 34074 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34011 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34003 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:54:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:54:05 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so97803wyg.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:53:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.50.11 with SMTP id y11mr1612067web.57.1287698025465; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:53:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:53:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbe80262c57e0493278f1d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dbe80262c57e0493278f1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 yep.. I've heard it's a source of contention... but I'd like to see how we can get it so the amount of patches that the large companies apply on top of the current production apache release gets minimized, and the large installations are all running nearly identical code on their clusters, and that we wouldn't need to have a yahoo or cloudera repo of their patch sets made available. So Ideally I'd like to hear what kind of things apache needs to do help get these kind of things less divergent. In discussing it with people, I've heard that a major issue (not the only one i'm sure) is lack of resources to actually test the apache releases on large clusters, and that it is very hard getting this done in short cycles (hence the large gap between 20.x and 21). So I thought I would start the thread to see if we could at least identify what the people think are the problems are. On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > > > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the > cloudera + > > yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, > > and what would be required. > > > *grabs popcorn* > > --0016e6dbe80262c57e0493278f1d-- From general-return-2214-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 21:54:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30311 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 21:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 35457 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35355 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35347 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:54:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:54:49 +0000 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so84972qwc.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:54:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.241.12 with SMTP id lc12mr1296738qcb.178.1287698065939; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:54:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the cloudera >> + >> yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, >> and what would be required. > > All of the patches that are the "yahoo distribution of hadoop" have been in > Apache's trunk for months. It's worth double checking. When we added the YDH patch set to CDH3 we ran a script to see which patches were in YDH but not yet in trunk and it turned up around 100 or so patches. A fair number of those may have been included in trunk but under a different jira, however some (eg MR-1088, MR-1100) are definitely not in trunk. Also, if I remember correctly some of the 20-based patches are substantially different than the versions for trunk. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2215-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:20:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48840 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:20:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 69211 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69150 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69142 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:20:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:20:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 48781 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.130]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:19:44 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/21/2010 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the cloudera + > yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, > and what would be required. Cloudera's distribution is based on Y!'s 0.20 distribution, together with patches from the Apache 0.20-append branch, patches cherry-picked from trunk and patches that have been submitted but not yet committed. Please note that both Cloudera and Y!'s distributions are 0.20-based distributions. Patches may have been committed to trunk, but nearly everyone is using 0.20 in production and will be for some time. There is currently no 0.20 branch at Apache that contains what most folks are using in production. There have been proposals to create such branches, most recently by Arun. Do you think this is worthwhile? Doug From general-return-2216-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:20:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48949 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:20:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 70503 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70459 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70451 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:20:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:20:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.96] (HELO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:20:17 +0000 Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MXea1f0021Y3wxoA9aKvrf; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:55 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-154-225.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MaKm1f00C2VBGtd8baKpbo; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:53 +0000 Message-Id: <03C46405-ECE7-44CE-925D-12E1989D4DD0@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:19:45 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > It's worth double checking. When we added the YDH patch set to CDH3 > we ran a script to see which patches were in YDH but not yet in trunk > and it turned up around 100 or so patches. If you could generate a list, that would be useful for tracking down the differences. Certainly, everyone was supposed to have gotten everything checked in. I see that I managed to forget h-6832. I just uploaded the patch and marked it patch available. -- Owen From general-return-2217-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:32:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54560 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 85233 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:32:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85182 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85174 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:32:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.121] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c102.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.102]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9LMU5h9034829 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:30:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287700206; bh=kkhrrUP9TdLZdVoj1LRtytMCCfabcBau0N3e20r4Ytk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iJ5um9qUfk0fV/H/BEeC8Xex0Q4bsLbmlO8ERfN5OJHWywN9EA0mK85m2BvuQyMkK d+kSMEBW/8TAs5bBaHbqBliJr6ZiubLlPRj6Ln7vmtbf8weAHEkUq6hbUCyWKCxDpP 9fqFIS+Oz1DJAdwESfCPXCasSeqNBNlcP763WVQQ= Message-ID: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:30:05 -0700 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > It's worth double checking. When we added the YDH patch set to CDH3 > we ran a script to see which patches were in YDH but not yet in trunk > and it turned up around 100 or so patches. If the patch was just checking 1:1 Jira to patch, it would certainly not work. We were uploading multiple patches to the same JIRA to avoid opening extraneous issues before generating patches for trunk. Venerable old HDFS-1150, for instance, went through about different patches applied to Y!'s branch before the final version. -jg Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> >>> I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the cloudera >>> + >>> yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, >>> and what would be required. >> All of the patches that are the "yahoo distribution of hadoop" have been in >> Apache's trunk for months. > fair number of those may > have been included in trunk but under a different jira, however some > (eg MR-1088, MR-1100) are definitely not in trunk. Also, if I > remember correctly some of the 20-based patches are substantially > different than the versions for trunk. > > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-2218-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:43:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58973 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:43:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 97356 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:43:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97283 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:43:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97275 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:43:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:43:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:42:56 +0000 Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MXaa1f0011vXlb856aicmp; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:42:36 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-154-225.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MaiS1f00M2VBGtd3daiVRv; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:42:34 +0000 Message-Id: <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:42:24 -0700 References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Cloudera's distribution is based on Y!'s 0.20 distribution, together > with patches from the Apache 0.20-append branch, Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop includes many tools from outside of Hadoop and even outside of Apache. -- Owen From general-return-2219-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 23:38:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85222 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 23:38:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 23:38:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 43557 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 23:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43503 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 23:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43495 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 23:38:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:38:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:38:04 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=orakKMd8SJugbec1iW7+uRsIJDUHKpiqfb3fudVCsgNLF8QVCzPGaBke cKPIV4bfWuUyIJkuT2KaU4jLb1VxEnGUV9zuLDSTOFFYy/RAJ7A8p1lXT VjfIKJ20Nj9L6EX; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287704284; x=1319240284; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20bringing=20the=20codebases=20back=20in =20line|Date:=20Thu,=2021=20Oct=202010=2023:37:44=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<1DF7DBA6CCA12744BA525EB728175D43@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A =20; bh=QVrBuptr9bKfWFd1Z1WFUcFGiSBGIQXPhgQ/pzK3UfY=; b=rp4QFevb/wExVJvD4N2Q7XESxPOwLLBLrSy5H/LBMqUE37zwZxhB7gc1 pihCVzjE3s/1SzwhywWIP6rZsPicqpTnUQ9/ghk/NnKYZnyOttgsX312F +SqNvmtN5zKLFzJ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,220,1286175600"; d="scan'208";a="16281347" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:37:44 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: AQHLcVQVuqCpAAO/eUm8zw+IHmCpg5NMP34AgAAoEICAAB0MgA== Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:37:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1DF7DBA6CCA12744BA525EB728175D43@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > yep.. I've heard it's a source of contention... Sure. Maybe like 8 months ago to anyone who was paying attention. > In discussing it with people, I've heard that a major issue (not the only > one i'm sure) is lack of resources to actually test the apache releases o= n > large clusters, and >=20 > So I thought I would start the thread to see if we could at least identif= y > what the people think are the problems are. I think you've asked the wrong question to begin with and I think the disc= ussion you've started is going to be completely counter productive and put = everyone on the defensive. [It is pretty clear it already has.] The team= is finally making progress towards a common goal (0.22) and (mostly) getti= ng along.=20 This question/issue > that it is very hard getting this done in short cycles > (hence the large gap between 20.x and 21). is really the cruxt of the problem. We wouldn't have had major diversions between the distributions if the mai= nline Apache distribution had been making more frequent releases. IMNSHO,= as long as the distributions don't break compatibility (forward or backwar= d) in without a word of warning... who cares? From general-return-2220-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 23:51:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89533 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 23:51:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 23:51:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 54578 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 23:51:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54487 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 23:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54479 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 23:51:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:51:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:50:55 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so194386wyg.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.142.131 with SMTP id i3mr10445829wej.5.1287705032816; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:50:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e9300e83bc0493293171 --0016e6d7e9300e83bc0493293171 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 right.. Cloudera is bundling it's add-ons into a single tarball to make it easier to install. but my main bone of contention here is not in the bundling, but that in order for those tools to work, they need to make changes to the base hadoop package. In my ideal world, I'd like to be able to just download/buy any of those tools and have them run on a released apache hadoop tarball. and then if someone else comes along with a competing tool I would be free to choose it and have it also run on my apache hadoop tarball, not have to go through the pain of saying XXX tool needs their customized version of hadoop so I can't use it. (ie remove the lock-in that comes from a forked base). but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is does the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? because if it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. so what I'd like to see is both cloudera and yahoo running a minimal set of patches as a 'superset' of the apache hadoop stuff, with the apache hadoop very close to both of these. the only patches being in either being to fix bugs or performance issues that would be available in the next release of a-hadoop. And when a new release of a-hadoop comes, it the vendors would switch to using that a-hadoop version as their baseline. I don't want to get into the situation that linux is in with redhat in that their kernel is dramatically different to the one on kernel.org. does that make sense? On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Cloudera's distribution is based on Y!'s 0.20 distribution, together with >> patches from the Apache 0.20-append branch, >> > > Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop includes many tools from outside of > Hadoop and even outside of Apache. > > -- Owen > > --0016e6d7e9300e83bc0493293171-- From general-return-2221-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:11:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98605 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:11:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 65895 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65807 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65799 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:11:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:11:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:11:26 +0000 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so148059gxk.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.153.138 with SMTP id m10mr1343950icw.261.1287706264374; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp ([38.104.141.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j7sm871276vcr.39.2010.10.21.17.11.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:10:57 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Message-ID: <20101022001057.GA2710@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:53PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > In discussing it with people, I've heard that a major issue (not the only > one i'm sure) is lack of resources to actually test the apache releases on > large clusters, and that it is very hard getting this done in short cycles > (hence the large gap between 20.x and 21). I do agree the lack of resources for testing Hadoop is a problem. However, there might be some slight difference in the meaning of word 'resources' ;) The only way, IMO, to have a reasonable testing done on a system as complex= as Hadoop is to invest into automatic validation of builds at system level. Th= is requires a few things (resources, if you will): - extra hardware (the easiest and cheapest problem) - automatic deployment, testing, and analysis - system tests development which able to control and observe a cluster behavior (in other words something more sophisticated than just shell scripts) And for the semi-adequate system testing you don't need a large cluster: 10= -20 nodes will be sufficient in most cases. But the automation of all the processes starting from deployment is the key. Testing automation is in a little better shape for Hadoop has that system test framework called Herriot (part of Hadoop code base for about 7 months now), but it still needs furth= er extending. Hopefully this briefs you about the cluster testing side of the issue. Cos > So I thought I would start the thread to see if we could at least identify > what the people think are the problems are. >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >=20 > > > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the > > cloudera + > > > yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, > > > and what would be required. > > > > > > *grabs popcorn* > > > > --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzA1pEACgkQIg9pgB8n5iKaXgCfbiEmKXnr4hBd0DZrOSFEWGtw GLQAoJCIDjLCSEjX4uHJDRgCLswlG/JX =LWKM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From general-return-2222-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:18:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 730 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:18:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 69978 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:18:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69935 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:18:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69927 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:18:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:18:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:18:15 +0000 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so153074qwc.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.146 with SMTP id kg18mr1411959qcb.205.1287706674670; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:17:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> It's worth double checking. =A0When we added the YDH patch set to CDH3 >> we ran a script to see which patches were in YDH but not yet in trunk >> and it turned up around 100 or so patches. > > If the patch was just checking 1:1 Jira to patch, it would certainly not > work. =A0We were uploading multiple patches to the same JIRA to avoid ope= ning > extraneous issues before generating patches for trunk. Venerable old > HDFS-1150, for instance, went through about different patches applied to > Y!'s branch before the final version. That's what I meant by saying "a fair number of those may have been included in trunk but under a different jira". There seemed to be a number of patches that are not in trunk under any jira (eg MR-1088, MR-1100 where the jira is still open). We need to go through the patches in YDH and CDH and get them reviewed and checked in. Thanks, Eli > -jg > > > Eli Collins wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> >>>> I wanted to start a conversation about how we could merge the the >>>> cloudera >>>> + >>>> yahoo distribtutions of hadoop into our codebase, >>>> and what would be required. >>> >>> All of the patches that are the "yahoo distribution of hadoop" have bee= n >>> in >>> Apache's trunk for months. >> > =A0fair number of those may >> >> have been included in trunk but under a different jira, however some >> (eg MR-1088, MR-1100) are definitely not in trunk. =A0Also, if I >> remember correctly some of the 20-based patches are substantially >> different than the versions for trunk. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > > From general-return-2223-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:31:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8907 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:31:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 76777 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76732 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76724 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:31:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmoores@real.com designates 207.188.23.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.188.23.6] (HELO jor-el.real.com) (207.188.23.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:31:09 +0000 Received: from seacas01.corp.real.com ([::ffff:192.168.139.56]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by jor-el.real.com with esmtp; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:30:41 -0700 id 00094069.4CC0DB31.00007768 Received: from seambx.corp.real.com ([fe80::2d15:fda7:b3b8:e268]) by seacas01.corp.real.com ([192.168.139.56]) with mapi; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:30:41 -0700 From: Michael Moores To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:30:40 -0700 Subject: Re: Limiting concurrent maps Thread-Topic: Limiting concurrent maps Thread-Index: ActxgFtaIc3s8+yySDaKEBykfejieQ== Message-ID: References: <8AE653F8-6EA6-4D50-A7B2-CA1B0CC75649@real.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ECA2730C2F854ECABA373E996D007938realcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_ECA2730C2F854ECABA373E996D007938realcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't see how the capacity scheduler could limit the number of maps runni= ng concurrently across the whole cluster, even if this is the only job running. but, maybe with the fair scheduler mapred.fairscheduler.loadmanager extensi= on point: mapred.fairscheduler.loadmanager An extensibility point that lets yo= u specify a class that determines how many maps and reduces can run on a gi= ven TaskTracker. This class should implement the LoadManager interface. By = default the task caps in the Hadoop config file are used, but this option c= ould be used to make the load based on available memory and CPU utilization= for example. On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:32 PM, james warren wrote: Hi Michael, Any of the tasktracker configs affect the local tasktracker daemon and not other servers in your cluster. Moreover, they can't be overridden by a job configuration. Sounds like you're in need of a job scheduler; I personally prefer use the Fair Scheduler but I'm sure the Capacity Scheduler would sui= t your needs as well. cheers, -James On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Michael Moores > wrote: I have been playing with mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum to reduce the load on my Cassandra cluster (using the Cassandra ColumnFamilyInputFormat). I'd like to find ways of throttling the map operations in the case I may be affecting OLTP activity on the cluster. What parameters can I use to limit the number of map tasks running concurrently across the whole cluster? mapreduce.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum limits the number of concurrent maps per task tracker. But can i do this at the job level? Should I look at the "fair" scheduler? regards,Michael --_000_ECA2730C2F854ECABA373E996D007938realcom_-- From general-return-2224-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:31:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9096 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:31:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 78311 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78258 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78250 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:31:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:31:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:31:41 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M0UMUR074026 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287707422; bh=HR0/9JPxuCN/MHi4fP8sniTfr6z5byHvLIfAyxMVb5g=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=PIIqRnX3U8WNnIzxZF8Ys7im6+xc1jgOxOkL1w9xW+3Lascs/2M+GjPDNtdeMHOCg s+oNRLpKEp/UrWA+D155Fc556r6trxGt2H3MvZM8y9uIBd8qdkzlkiN2Kbhpp74oLR tWnC4eToWZrvWjZHx0R5aGYLHjG6LxRG5BcvFyr4= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:30:22 -0700 References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Ian, On Oct 21, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is > does > the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? > because if > it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. Yahoo put security on Apache Hadoop-0.20. Apache Hadoop trunk is very far from hadoop-0.20, there are lots of features in trunk which aren't part of yahoo-hadoop-0.20 simply because there wasn't a need or it wasn't worth our effort to backport them etc. I know, since I have a big hand in deciding it. However, we have been very religious about porting all our changes to trunk, we might have missed a couple due to time pressure, human mistake etc. Thus, it isn't feasible for yahoo distribution to be a superset of trunk. Even more because it takes a *huge* amount of effort to qualify trunk... we at Yahoo qualified Apache Hadoop 0.20 and have stuck with it for over a year now, same as Cloudera, Facebook etc. Again, I'll point out that we have been very good at porting nearly 4000 internal commits to trunk throughout this time. Hope that helps. thanks, Arun From general-return-2225-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:32:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9274 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:32:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 79619 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79572 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:32:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79564 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:32:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:32:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of acm@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:32:31 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M0Vj7L074614 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287707506; bh=jqVh7TFdvJ3Fiy0hsp8xQGLBWxJzufwFJLhuE3ondzs=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=djkI+yAwPBSQuvTY4g9qC9+bTN3h5waa3jh967SCAMq852p9RuQ4esgvfIkNdfqBo X28QOE+8kj8TfX5IoI7FIn/lBvUpnsiv2q3URx5R9fduAg/bpmkGjaxlZ6j7jvA7cm 4MG1UWPRZv964Z370iJagUgcVH+WcP8YXa8aeshM= Message-Id: <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:31:45 -0700 References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jakob Homan > wrote: >> If the patch was just checking 1:1 Jira to patch, it would >> certainly not >> work. We were uploading multiple patches to the same JIRA to avoid >> opening >> extraneous issues before generating patches for trunk. Venerable old >> HDFS-1150, for instance, went through about different patches >> applied to >> Y!'s branch before the final version. > > That's what I meant by saying "a fair number of those may have been > included in trunk but under a different jira". There seemed to be a > number of patches that are not in trunk under any jira (eg MR-1088, > MR-1100 where the jira is still open). We need to go through the > patches in YDH and CDH and get them reviewed and checked in. It would be great to get HADOOP-6255, the functionality for creating RPMs, from CDH to Apache Hadoop. Arun From general-return-2226-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:34:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9872 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:34:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 83758 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83704 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83696 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:34:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:34:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:34:18 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M0XRhK075188 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:33:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287707607; bh=yMxJUvRKY38cJ7/ScnzwZJxmI1kCRW6vf0YKH3aiVmk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=lA+ccwRaeD8qEf3iu6WMNuECVJGIwxItLVx4SzOV68ur3yQRcKOywCDpkupJATLav 1SozKwRgTuIJXTwCy4G3gw5Fvnk0OsLH/kr6Lj2Ja3UT2W4OjbqGyEHbgzZA8sQQJS 5Qq94aF3WBimVb44utMkb0r5dYe1m4RZxo9+uv6c= Message-Id: <360ECE7D-48B4-4B74-8F4A-605B51C21043@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Limiting concurrent maps Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:33:27 -0700 References: <8AE653F8-6EA6-4D50-A7B2-CA1B0CC75649@real.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Michael Moores wrote: > I don't see how the capacity scheduler could limit the number of > maps running concurrently across the whole cluster, > even if this is the only job running. > Easy, set a maximum limit on the queue. Arun From general-return-2227-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:38:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10980 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:38:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:38:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 87493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:38:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87441 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87433 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:38:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:38:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:38:01 +0000 Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so180043yxn.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:37:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.185.208 with SMTP id cp16mr1422485qcb.213.1287707860137; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:37:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:37:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > right.. Cloudera is bundling it's add-ons into a single tarball to make i= t > easier to install. CDH contains a number of different projects, however each project has a distinct tarball (and packages). The tarball is essentially an Apache release (tarball) plus a directory that has a set of patches that we've applied to the Apache release (our build process downloads the Apache release and applies our set of patches). For each version of CDH we rebase our patch set on the latest Apache dot release available at the time to minimize our delta with upstream. Here's an example tarball: http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/hadoop-0.20.2+737.tar.gz > In my ideal world, I'd like to be able to just download/buy any of those > tools and have them run on a released apache hadoop tarball. and then if > someone else comes along with a competing tool I would be free to choose = it > and have it also run on my apache hadoop tarball, not have to go through = the > pain of saying XXX tool needs their customized version of hadoop so I can= 't > use it. (ie remove the lock-in that comes from a forked base). All of our Apache projects are an Apache release plus a set of patches, these are typically backports of bug fixes in trunk but not a dot release. Except for Hadoop, the set of additional patches is very small. Here's an example, the 16 changes not in Pig 0.7 that we've included: http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/pig-0.7.0+16.CHANGES.txt > so what I'd like to see is both cloudera and yahoo running a minimal set = of > patches as a 'superset' of the apache hadoop stuff, with the apache hadoo= p > very close to both of these. the only patches being in either being to fi= x > bugs or performance issues that would be available in the next release of > a-hadoop. That's our goal as well. For all the Apache projects in CDH, except for Hadoop, that is the case today. For CDH3 we ended up adding large additional patch sets (the security patch set the append patch set to support HBase), but for Apache 22 the majority of the delta that CDH and YDH have against Apache 20 will go away (thanks to Y! contributing security and append to trunk). > And when a new release of a-hadoop comes, it the vendors would switch to > using that a-hadoop version as their baseline. > > I don't want to get into the situation that linux is in with redhat in th= at > their kernel is dramatically different to the one on kernel.org. > > does that make sense? Definitely. Thanks, Eli > > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : > >> >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> >> =A0Cloudera's distribution is based on Y!'s 0.20 distribution, together = with >>> patches from the Apache 0.20-append branch, >>> >> >> Cloudera's Distribution of Hadoop includes many tools from outside of >> Hadoop and even outside of Apache. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > From general-return-2228-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:42:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12299 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:42:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:42:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 91540 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:42:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91474 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91441 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:42:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:42:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:42:37 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M0g346040917 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287708123; bh=w2ObZruhrHrYLtj1o7h5UavQBq0DfMG83DFQJAL30gQ=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=AaEQAtaWD/DlExp08NROXLqdCjzxy6lci3Nm0YK7nqz6YGZwYCMq7zFdvdO2kSlkj uI8JnMZt3+7ruzTbnacq6wgF2KboqgE1BVeC0a4qm32eFvtYsjn7OaXv9zQ7AhbQZX ExeFGQzzjoTJR57Zb090WQjdORAn+aG5XWfZXb/k= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:42:03 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:42:02 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: ActxgfGGYCFzr2FGS/affJInvqGXnQ== Message-ID: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >=20 > but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is does > the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? because= if > it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. What are these "other" reasons ? yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see why an= y production cluster should run code from trunk. - Milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2229-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:52:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14229 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 533 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 480 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 472 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:52:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:52:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:52:06 +0000 Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so189545yxn.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.193 with SMTP id kl1mr540184qcb.37.1287708705320; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:51:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jakob Homan wrot= e: >>> >>> If the patch was just checking 1:1 Jira to patch, it would certainly no= t >>> work. =A0We were uploading multiple patches to the same JIRA to avoid >>> opening >>> extraneous issues before generating patches for trunk. Venerable old >>> HDFS-1150, for instance, went through about different patches applied t= o >>> Y!'s branch before the final version. >> >> That's what I meant by saying "a fair number of those may have been >> included in trunk but under a different jira". =A0There seemed to be a >> number of patches that are not in trunk under any jira (eg MR-1088, >> MR-1100 where the jira is still open). =A0We need to go through the >> patches in YDH and CDH and get them reviewed and checked in. > > It would be great to get HADOOP-6255, the functionality for creating RPMs= , > from CDH to Apache Hadoop. > There are some challenges in contributing packaging up stream: - Packaging is typically versioned independently from the project code (we share packaging code across project major versions). This is why most projects have a separate repository for the packaging, and the packaging is done by a distribution. - The packaging source shares code across the 10 or so components, which is useful since we continuously make the packaging more consistent, so hosting the code on any single project repository doesn't fit well. - The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris). All of our packaging is Apache licensed (and we publish source RPMs) so there's no issue from that perspective. But this is a digression from the subject at hand so we should probably table for a separate discussion. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2230-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:54:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15152 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:54:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 3043 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:54:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3004 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2996 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:54:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:54:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:54:44 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so240887wyg.35 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.212 with SMTP id x62mr1768607web.55.1287708863171; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:54:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:54:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f5ce5c5d0f3704932a1535 --001485f5ce5c5d0f3704932a1535 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar wrote: > > > > > but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is does > > the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? because > if > > it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. > > > What are these "other" reasons ? > yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see why any > production cluster should run code from trunk. > > right.. the trunk is not for production use. I wasn't suggesting that. but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move to rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-porting what they need to the version they are running on their clusters. and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and harder as the paths diverge. I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch lands on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. - Milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) --001485f5ce5c5d0f3704932a1535-- From general-return-2231-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:58:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15519 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:58:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 6757 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:58:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6703 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:58:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6695 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:58:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:58:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:58:05 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M0vN7V031305 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:57:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287709044; bh=dgHQ7p2KQNWAZxh1zhqzZb0QNt44VOhgPkyMiJO+QS0=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=ZvaLarxVjr11QSF/wNYur9g7qsmE030zVAVRHoU6chfywYDPwjsPugVbS3EuLK+F9 N1fe45K8tDOyQDeWulmBwOT7DWO/CnJalKXsJDEP4c3MT27mkTS+5CSXZY329lE+ls HB0OR8Gf/joSEBYwQRxDSYPOuUmf2C99RuZe4v7s= Message-Id: <3FF18D23-A2C3-4CD0-BD37-E1DF0C4F5E61@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:57:23 -0700 References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I was merely pointing out, given the number of interested parties on that jira, that having Hadoop RPMs for Linux is very desirable. We could have a technical discussion on the ways to go about doing RPMs, debs etc., but it is clear that there is a need for something more than tgz releases, even if they are Linux specific. This is particularly true given Linux specific components such as LinuxTaskController, jsvc for security etc. Arun On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: >> >> On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Jakob Homan >> inc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If the patch was just checking 1:1 Jira to patch, it would >>>> certainly not >>>> work. We were uploading multiple patches to the same JIRA to avoid >>>> opening >>>> extraneous issues before generating patches for trunk. Venerable >>>> old >>>> HDFS-1150, for instance, went through about different patches >>>> applied to >>>> Y!'s branch before the final version. >>> >>> That's what I meant by saying "a fair number of those may have been >>> included in trunk but under a different jira". There seemed to be a >>> number of patches that are not in trunk under any jira (eg MR-1088, >>> MR-1100 where the jira is still open). We need to go through the >>> patches in YDH and CDH and get them reviewed and checked in. >> >> It would be great to get HADOOP-6255, the functionality for >> creating RPMs, >> from CDH to Apache Hadoop. >> > > There are some challenges in contributing packaging up stream: > - Packaging is typically versioned independently from the project code > (we share packaging code across project major versions). This is why > most projects have a separate repository for the packaging, and the > packaging is done by a distribution. > - The packaging source shares code across the 10 or so components, > which is useful since we continuously make the packaging more > consistent, so hosting the code on any single project repository > doesn't fit well. > - The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying > to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache > supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris). > > All of our packaging is Apache licensed (and we publish source RPMs) > so there's no issue from that perspective. But this is a digression > from the subject at hand so we should probably table for a separate > discussion. > > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-2232-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 04:30:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74462 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 04:30:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 04:30:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 4014 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 04:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3777 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 04:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3769 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 04:30:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:30:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:30:20 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9M4TV35085162 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287721771; bh=wfhVtbFNbrJzmFj0ofwsWYHFmlD4xWmBIzhMR0Y2CX4=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Hf6Lgk6iRfc8ON6wWvVSfXQQCoUySzoYTTHxOQCsD7+FDioDYolEgDuLSdB+YKVCj MER6J3Ye3lYKbXOWOHBWeyHYa1avJoGhJvtloT/+gUgwXOarWhUo+aV3pekG/y+Ez2 ataevIuGq0qommilPfJmp+768/spF5x7u7UTQOK8= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:29:31 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:29:30 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: Actxobh0SglnEJLYSFWf6kjVnGvYhw== Message-ID: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 >>=20 > right.. the trunk is not for production use. I wasn't suggesting that. So, what are you suggesting ? That Yahoo distribution of Hadoop should *not= * be the version we run on our production clusters ? >=20 > but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. >=20 > Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move to > rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-porting wh= at > they need to the version they are running on their clusters. Yes, that is what we do now. If there are committed patches in trunk that d= o not scale for our needs, or break existing applications, or are deemed no= t worth the efforts needed to backport, we do not include them in our deplo= yments, and therefore do not include in Yahoo distribution. >=20 > and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be > forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and harde= r > as the paths diverge. Yes, indeed. So, care must be taken that paths do not diverge too much. I h= ave seen some cases where the bug fixes did not need to be forward ported, = because that piece of code was completely re-written in trunk. >=20 > I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch land= s > on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. Yes. And that results in delayed releases. An unexpected benefit for applic= ation developers was that they could spend time adding features to their ap= plications, rather than porting same applications from release-to-release, = and validating releases. So, it's not always bad. - Milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2233-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 06:40:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13829 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 06:40:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 06:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 14935 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14638 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14630 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 06:40:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:40:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:40:35 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAO00HZSIIFP130@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:39:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-22_03:2010-10-22,2010-10-22,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010210287 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:39:51 -0700 Message-id: References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Tom White wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >>> I suggest we make this stronger. >>> By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig >>> (http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example. >> >> Consensus is equivalent to making the PMC a permanent appointment. >> Discussions would be more civil and more likely to offer compromise- >> we would actually work toward consensus- if intransigence and >> hostility had consequences. Removing people is a last resort. Moving >> the barrier closer doesn't make it more likely, but it aligns >> incentives so rational people will reign in their more intemperate >> comments and, instead, find ways to make progress. >> >> Many projects require supermajorities or even 3/4 majorities. It's >> sufficiently damning if more than half the PMC thinks an individual is >> so destructive that less damage would be done by ejecting them, in my >> opinion, but again: this is not a facility we should use, or have to >> use. Throwing someone out is an expensive failure for the project, and >> an conspicuous failure of its governance and community. Personally, I >> don't care if it's a majority or a supermajority, but consensus is a >> fig leaf. > > Fair point. For a large PMC, that's probably true. This matter was > discussed on the Pig list, and there was a range of opinion there: > http://search-hadoop.com/m/jk35b2tZCuy&subj=RE+DISCUSS+Apache+Pig+bylaws. > Personally, I think a supermajority strikes the right balance. > > Tom Yup, all good points Chris. I, too, agree that supermajority strikes a good balance. Nige From general-return-2234-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 06:46:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14603 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 06:46:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 06:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 19153 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:46:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18890 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:46:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18882 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 06:46:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:46:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:46:32 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=qgpTGuX/SXKpVO9eF+o8G/bIDv8PgD0xFRjfEqjye4fZkjvN9A8GK92e iM+F7wNp+pkmpuYoKjh0PG80gJOb8wpUla2vSwPapYSiJQnId8lrJ/4zi NOwKbzKXvEDQXgS; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287729992; x=1319265992; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20bringing=20the=20codebases=20back=20in =20line|Date:=20Fri,=2022=20Oct=202010=2006:46:11=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<253774F2-2590-4E67-BB5B-86FE5BD5A555@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20< AANLkTimnqhcG_nazMjSjwvXnvw_udDXJkFq3VbNwXZda@mail.gmail. com>=0D=0A=20<4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo- inc.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=oflcqlVo1UXk/m4FkuTVWyh01jj8MEFXRo8Nk2BQNjk=; b=JFFOx13PME2AO+6P/hCMt7I54ZHPp4aScj10uV1FfjtlOiXvbpgLvfmO KAru9tH/CanIJ95HlmbUgZaAJbH3mQmCvithaPw0edQE+pATrER7IJtIb +K/1f65nMSCkDYs; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,222,1286175600"; d="scan'208";a="16287934" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:46:11 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: AQHLcVQVuqCpAAO/eUm8zw+IHmCpg5NMR8eAgAAf9oCAAAn3gIAAHiAAgAAD34CAAAWWgIAAYwYA Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:46:11 +0000 Message-ID: <253774F2-2590-4E67-BB5B-86FE5BD5A555@linkedin.com> References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 > - The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying > to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache > supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris). Oh come now Eli. Just say it: I push everyone really hard on making thing= s multiple platform to the point of being as trollish as this Ian fellow th= at started this thread. Most of the Linux-specific modifications that I've seen that have been sub= mitted are specifically to avoid configuring the system properly*, built in= such a way that they weren't pluggable for other operating systems, or cou= ld be done in a much more POSIX/OS-agnostic way. The fact that there are p= arts of Hadoop that don't work properly on Mac OS X (despite the overwhelmi= ng number of Mac laptops in use by Hadoop core devs) always struck me as pa= rticularly funny when people get frustrated with me when I point this probl= ems out. It is also worth mentioning that, AFAIK, only Linux and AIX have OS-specif= ic code in Hadoop. Attempts to get fixes (not even features!) for specific= issues for other operating systems have been fully rejected with the cry o= f "we the community don't want to support specific OS issues in the core", = even tho some of them are direct hinderance to the proper operation of Hado= op on those OSes. We have a very big double standard at work here. * e.g., searching through x LInux distribution directories looking for a w= orking JRE in the primary hadoop script to protect users from putting the l= ocation in hadoop-env.sh. To me the great irony here is that this is the = type of code that'd be great for a (mostly) single use tool do... like, say= , a packaging system....= From general-return-2235-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 11:38:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2292 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 11:38:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 11:38:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 84207 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84094 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84086 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 11:38:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:38:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A256BB7DF0 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:35 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dE1uI6tX6JEg for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6310B7D6F for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:34 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288352237.81233@sQlDbTcssYuoo8iVNWnMMQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9MBbH3X024370 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CC1776D.50901@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:37:17 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9MBbH3X024370 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 21/10/10 22:53, Ian Holsman wrote: > yep.. I've heard it's a source of contention... > > but I'd like to see how we can get it so the amount of patches that the > large companies apply on top of the current production apache release gets > minimized, and the large installations are all running nearly identical code > on their clusters, and that we wouldn't need to have a yahoo or cloudera > repo of their patch sets made available. > > So Ideally I'd like to hear what kind of things apache needs to do help get > these kind of things less divergent. > > In discussing it with people, I've heard that a major issue (not the only > one i'm sure) is lack of resources to actually test the apache releases on > large clusters, and that it is very hard getting this done in short cycles > (hence the large gap between 20.x and 21). > > So I thought I would start the thread to see if we could at least identify > what the people think are the problems are. A big issue is the $ value of the data in a production cluster, the size of the large clusters, and the fact that they are in use. The only way to test on a few hundred nodes -especially now that 12-24TB/node is possible, is when you are bringing up a cluster of this size, which is a pretty rare event. Lots of us have small real or virtual clusters, but they don't stress the NN or JT, don't raise emergent problems like the increasing cost of rebalancing 24TB nodes if they go down, etc. From general-return-2236-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 11:41:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2982 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 11:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 11:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 87244 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87054 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:41:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87046 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 11:41:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:41:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:41:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9241BA78E for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:40:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id csccMdV7x6Mv for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:40:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5141BA5F4 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:40:42 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288352428.33402@jU+9iWBP8MBFkmRrAaAsuA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9MBeRCv024581 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:40:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CC1782B.8040504@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:40:27 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <20101022001057.GA2710@tp> In-Reply-To: <20101022001057.GA2710@tp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9MBeRCv024581 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 22/10/10 01:10, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:53PM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> In discussing it with people, I've heard that a major issue (not the only >> one i'm sure) is lack of resources to actually test the apache releases on >> large clusters, and that it is very hard getting this done in short cycles >> (hence the large gap between 20.x and 21). > > I do agree the lack of resources for testing Hadoop is a problem. However, > there might be some slight difference in the meaning of word 'resources' ;) > > The only way, IMO, to have a reasonable testing done on a system as complex as > Hadoop is to invest into automatic validation of builds at system level. This > requires a few things (resources, if you will): > - extra hardware (the easiest and cheapest problem) > - automatic deployment, testing, and analysis > - system tests development which able to control and observe a cluster > behavior (in other words something more sophisticated than just shell > scripts) > > And for the semi-adequate system testing you don't need a large cluster: 10-20 > nodes will be sufficient in most cases. But the automation of all the > processes starting from deployment is the key. Testing automation is in a > little better shape for Hadoop has that system test framework called Herriot > (part of Hadoop code base for about 7 months now), but it still needs further > extending. > +1 for testing, I would like to help with this, but my test stuff depends on my lifecycle stuff which I need to sit down, sync up with trunk and work out how to get in. One thing you can do in a virtual world which you can't do in the physical space is reconfigure the LAN on the fly, to see what happens. For example, I could set up VLANs of two racks and a switch between them, then partition the two and see what happens -while a simulated external load (separate issue) hits the NN with the same amount of traffic. Fun things. From general-return-2237-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 11:46:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4550 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 11:46:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 11:46:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 92200 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:46:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92034 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92026 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 11:46:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:46:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:46:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E5FB7D4C for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OHu0A+Tzdcvx for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6427DB7D41 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:43 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288352729.29833@yBON/f2Gs1qdpZqMPyvT8g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9MBjSQm024768 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CC17958.3090301@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:45:28 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9MBjSQm024768 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 22/10/10 01:42, Milind A Bhandarkar wrote: > >> >> but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is does >> the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? because if >> it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. > > > What are these "other" reasons ? > > yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see why any production cluster should run code from trunk. Transient virtual clusters where the FS only exists for a couple of hours can do this, but big live physical ones shouldn't, too much data at risk. So it depends on your view of "production". If it is "someone wants a cluster for 3h to analyse their nightly logs", then you can get away with it -it's the best testing you can do. One problem I hit doing this is that if you do upgrade every week, if the app starts failing, you can waste a lot of time trying to decide whether its the app code that's changed or trunk, and then if its trunk, whether that's a regression or a change that's caused a bug in the app code to surface. To be really strict, you should A/B test your virtual clusters on the stable and trunk versions, see which finishes faster -and whether there are any differences in the output. that would be very slick for testing indeed. From general-return-2238-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 11:48:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4953 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 11:48:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 11:48:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 93983 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:48:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93743 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 11:48:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93735 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 11:48:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:48:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:48:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8515E1BA614 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p008M62uC7Dr for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E751BA59D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:09 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288352874.42009@8PA3pykAuWszfpbKWB4KNg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9MBlrF3024906 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:47:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CC179E9.4050307@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:47:53 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9MBlrF3024906 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 22/10/10 01:51, Eli Collins wrote: > > There are some challenges in contributing packaging up stream: > - Packaging is typically versioned independently from the project code > (we share packaging code across project major versions). This is why > most projects have a separate repository for the packaging, and the > packaging is done by a distribution. which is why I proposed a downstream integration project > - The packaging source shares code across the 10 or so components, > which is useful since we continuously make the packaging more > consistent, so hosting the code on any single project repository > doesn't fit well. same reason > - The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying > to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache > supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris). I think the apple and oracle Java issues may allow those issues to be re-evaluated. Again, something in the ASF that's downstream -and which then does the testing- would be good. One thing people don't realise is how much effort goes into good RPM packaging -Eli does- but others may not. It is hard work to get right, very hard to test things like RPM upgrades of an existing installation, etc. -steve From general-return-2239-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 16:06:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22397 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 16:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 16:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 70018 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 16:06:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69958 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 16:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69950 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 16:06:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:06:32 +0000 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so271769pzk.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.165.7 with SMTP id s7mr3738086muo.51.1287763568551; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c25sm1525075fac.33.2010.10.22.09.06.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:06:02 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed bylaws for Hadoop Message-ID: <20101022160602.GA17626@tp> References: <63A1C7A9-727B-4492-9998-01F6B6958EDD@apache.org> <4CBE11C5.301@apache.org> <580DC943-D250-405D-A524-82452CBC4E03@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on supermajority - enough "people democracy". On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:39PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Tom White wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Douglas wr= ote: >=20 > >>> I suggest we make this stronger. > >>> By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig > >>> (http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example. > >>=20 > >> Consensus is equivalent to making the PMC a permanent appointment. > >> Discussions would be more civil and more likely to offer compromise- > >> we would actually work toward consensus- if intransigence and > >> hostility had consequences. Removing people is a last resort. Moving > >> the barrier closer doesn't make it more likely, but it aligns > >> incentives so rational people will reign in their more intemperate > >> comments and, instead, find ways to make progress. > >>=20 > >> Many projects require supermajorities or even 3/4 majorities. It's > >> sufficiently damning if more than half the PMC thinks an individual is > >> so destructive that less damage would be done by ejecting them, in my > >> opinion, but again: this is not a facility we should use, or have to > >> use. Throwing someone out is an expensive failure for the project, and > >> an conspicuous failure of its governance and community. Personally, I > >> don't care if it's a majority or a supermajority, but consensus is a > >> fig leaf. > >=20 > > Fair point. For a large PMC, that's probably true. This matter was > > discussed on the Pig list, and there was a range of opinion there: > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/jk35b2tZCuy&subj=3DRE+DISCUSS+Apache+Pig+byl= aws. > > Personally, I think a supermajority strikes the right balance. > >=20 > > Tom >=20 > Yup, all good points Chris. I, too, agree that supermajority strikes a go= od balance. >=20 > Nige --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzBtmoACgkQIg9pgB8n5iKTfQCffNTTmE30oRzr3p8puuPmmTl2 jUQAmwStgdGgdTVyv4ivVuwijh47C80/ =vzWn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From general-return-2240-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 16:37:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31756 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 16:37:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 16:37:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17903 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 16:37:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17854 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 16:37:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17846 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 16:37:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:37:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:37:24 +0000 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so293993pzk.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.108.12 with SMTP id k12mr988716mum.68.1287765420639; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10sm1547878fak.3.2010.10.22.09.36.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:36:55 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Message-ID: <20101022163655.GB17626@tp> References: <20101022001057.GA2710@tp> <4CC1782B.8040504@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wq9mPyueHGvFACwf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC1782B.8040504@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:40PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 22/10/10 01:10, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > >The only way, IMO, to have a reasonable testing done on a system as comp= lex as > >Hadoop is to invest into automatic validation of builds at system level.= This > >requires a few things (resources, if you will): > > - extra hardware (the easiest and cheapest problem) > > - automatic deployment, testing, and analysis > > - system tests development which able to control and observe a cluster > > behavior (in other words something more sophisticated than just she= ll > > scripts) > > > +1 for testing, I would like to help with this, but my test stuff > depends on my lifecycle stuff which I need to sit down, sync up with > trunk and work out how to get in. >=20 > One thing you can do in a virtual world which you can't do in the > physical space is reconfigure the LAN on the fly, to see what > happens. For example, I could set up VLANs of two racks and a switch > between them, then partition the two and see what happens -while a > simulated external load (separate issue) hits the NN with the same > amount of traffic. Fun things. Awesome idea! I guess it is well aligned with Herriot's abilities to do fau= lt injections on real (or virual) hardware. --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzBvacACgkQIg9pgB8n5iI9VwCgjnCcLKEoYZsxZL58Qd12hw4n pFcAniea7mi3PML8vV22KeNp4/RvPkAT =O+VV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf-- From general-return-2241-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 17:36:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58419 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 17:36:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 17:36:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19005 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 17:36:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18941 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 17:36:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18933 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 17:36:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:36:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:36:52 +0000 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so327737pzk.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3G0aEj+A++bYSssJIo3sHz3IERZ54asgdc1uULRJUpo=; b=dNnOVHNQEbHiIt/yJAUhNEktU/3c7rUila9BSELSXWxlIOVHg/Vl7OROQqFsbnktg1 YSwmjh+MpHpBCsP4orx2ju5+msOtLxHpZDFUF+hW2DNYIbdMDU6e9XzNvEAiUJbIDDjc TUyJZVuttSQgP9RvMrtrgJ+9fowKXBDxX37cE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ViWPqh6sns6FGhQ3MvvwuWSPI/vLZmOKPsShBv168HZkBMHRAuyfeyAwo61tS0FFcp tt+1Dg61RQxRd8dFscTMvWgg1U77ra7R2JL2y8XbtSAMuk79gCG6U3Zcz3jN6uVT6Ej6 bfCwOkLL9qwkxezZZR0Tt2Hz1jX3HqYi0eM20= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.245.11 with SMTP id s11mr2175231wfh.392.1287768991855; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.88.15 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:36:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd171f24ff46f049338156a --000e0cd171f24ff46f049338156a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Milind's point is valid, the PMC cannot demand or control what Yahoo, Facebook, et. al. run in their productions, or what Couldera sells to their customers AS LONG AS it is within the Apache licensing requirements. What Apache Hadoop can and should provide is a *steady* stream of base A-releases. I think that a single fact that we missed to release Hadoop 0.21 late last year got us into the state we are in now. As it let different Hadoop installations to diverge drastically from each other, whether it was based on production or commercial reasons. Now that we have that, it would not be feasible or worthwhile to find the common denominator based on the old 0.20 version, unless we want to spend another year looking for it and diverging the individual installations even more in the process. So the question imo is not "how we merge the cloudera and yahoo distributions", but when/how do we make the new 0.22 release. And how do we provide a steady release cycle after that. --Konstantin On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar wrote: > >> > > right.. the trunk is not for production use. I wasn't suggesting that. > > So, what are you suggesting ? That Yahoo distribution of Hadoop should > *not* be the version we run on our production clusters ? > > > > > but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. > > > > > Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move to > > rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-porting > what > > they need to the version they are running on their clusters. > > Yes, that is what we do now. If there are committed patches in trunk that > do not scale for our needs, or break existing applications, or are deemed > not worth the efforts needed to backport, we do not include them in our > deployments, and therefore do not include in Yahoo distribution. > > > > > and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be > > forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and > harder > > as the paths diverge. > > Yes, indeed. So, care must be taken that paths do not diverge too much. I > have seen some cases where the bug fixes did not need to be forward ported, > because that piece of code was completely re-written in trunk. > > > > > I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch > lands > > on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. > > Yes. And that results in delayed releases. An unexpected benefit for > application developers was that they could spend time adding features to > their applications, rather than porting same applications from > release-to-release, and validating releases. So, it's not always bad. > > - Milind > > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) > (phone: 408-203-5213 W) > > > --000e0cd171f24ff46f049338156a-- From general-return-2242-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 17:49:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64017 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 17:49:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 17:49:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 36508 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 17:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36357 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 17:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36349 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 17:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:49:22 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9MHlm3x047771 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:47:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287769668; bh=4Tw7BtLpf/yCTI6Yj0+gf/gjnRpb61pMxvMXzCbPDWA=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=j6DN2lQWwD5hQeDTyd27IBZfI9D0lFepz81A2OmNAu5k0syx1DdNFJ3cBtN45JEL/ wvAs87hliuN6zTHUYPEeDQTrEzzeTat8I1EJwvKXQDz/n0E53lDmDcZzgErcYcqOMq 51ltJfTgfwfxTb38IO0Fz0/pdoqgCLIsNQlL+Rig= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:47:48 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:47:48 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: ActyET3B84mdT6OASLOKHiXYDoGRUA== Message-ID: <3235F7D9-AD2C-4508-B921-D1CE527D3535@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1 On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > So the question imo is not "how we merge the cloudera and yahoo > distributions", but when/how do we make the new 0.22 release. > And how do we provide a steady release cycle after that. -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2243-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 20:07:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16498 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 20:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 20:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89222 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 20:07:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89105 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 20:07:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89092 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 20:07:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:07:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:07:22 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9MK6TEM097572 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:06:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287777989; bh=qmXeWYNjlTWTlUfx1NvIfjyLwfqK0/m61ev1pWfIEl4=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=J3vuEUh/DGGPbrea9uKUtcsPAj/u6uXHZ1JZ1Z26ZeLQMwvA2JqgI6JD3ZQwN084K pPLUL1rlM8TQeJlN1BxCENoC2logZkVJ90ZJWF+IBRPqk4MdR+f0Bj5vsw4gSCqc3Z gEw0BKKDTTUnuSdjqcDlSqsXtVvhyIoCka5ZvQjo= Message-Id: <6ADD878D-CEEC-4A88-87D2-717D134F8E91@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:06:29 -0700 References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Milind's point is valid, the PMC cannot demand or control what Yahoo, > Facebook, et. al. run in their productions, or what Couldera sells > to their > customers AS LONG AS it is within the Apache licensing > requirements. > > What Apache Hadoop can and should provide is a *steady* stream of base > A-releases. > > I think that a single fact that we missed to release Hadoop 0.21 > late last > year got us into the state we are in now. As it let different Hadoop > installations to diverge drastically from each other, whether it was > based > on production or commercial reasons. > > Now that we have that, it would not be feasible or worthwhile to > find the > common denominator based on the old 0.20 version, unless we want to > spend > another year looking for it and diverging the individual > installations even > more in the process. > > So the question imo is not "how we merge the cloudera and yahoo > distributions", but when/how do we make the new 0.22 release. > And how do we provide a steady release cycle after that. +1 sanjay > > --Konstantin > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar > wrote: > >>>> >>> right.. the trunk is not for production use. I wasn't suggesting >>> that. >> >> So, what are you suggesting ? That Yahoo distribution of Hadoop >> should >> *not* be the version we run on our production clusters ? >> >>> >>> but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. >> >>> >>> Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to >>> move to >>> rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back- >>> porting >> what >>> they need to the version they are running on their clusters. >> >> Yes, that is what we do now. If there are committed patches in >> trunk that >> do not scale for our needs, or break existing applications, or are >> deemed >> not worth the efforts needed to backport, we do not include them in >> our >> deployments, and therefore do not include in Yahoo distribution. >> >>> >>> and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be >>> forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and >> harder >>> as the paths diverge. >> >> Yes, indeed. So, care must be taken that paths do not diverge too >> much. I >> have seen some cases where the bug fixes did not need to be forward >> ported, >> because that piece of code was completely re-written in trunk. >> >>> >>> I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch >> lands >>> on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. >> >> Yes. And that results in delayed releases. An unexpected benefit for >> application developers was that they could spend time adding >> features to >> their applications, rather than porting same applications from >> release-to-release, and validating releases. So, it's not always bad. >> >> - Milind >> >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) >> (phone: 408-203-5213 W) >> >> >> From general-return-2244-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 21:52:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44665 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 21:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 21:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26151 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 21:52:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26113 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 21:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26105 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 21:52:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:52:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:52:22 +0000 Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1675719gwb.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.231.3 with SMTP id jo3mr2784777qcb.21.1287784321143; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.131 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar > wrote: > >> >> > >> > but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is d= oes >> > the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? beca= use >> if >> > it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. >> >> >> What are these "other" reasons ? >> > > yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see why = any >> production cluster should run code from trunk. >> >> > right.. the trunk is not for production use. =A0I wasn't suggesting that. > > but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. > > Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move to > rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-porting wh= at > they need to the version they are running on their clusters. > > and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be > forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and harde= r > as the paths diverge. > > I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch land= s > on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. Hey Ian, I think we're all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). The open question is whether we try to come up with a common 20-based branch or wait for 22. That's been previously discussed on this list and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that we should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. Our current plan is to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested release with security and append should get users off the current 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in YDH/CDH) we are willing to create and maintain this branch on Apache. Thanks, Eli > =A0- Milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) > (phone: 408-203-5213 W) > From general-return-2245-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 22:04:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47439 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 22:04:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 22:04:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 46748 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 22:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46688 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 22:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46680 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 22:04:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:04:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:04:27 +0000 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1174654gyg.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.14.143 with SMTP id g15mr2763291qca.208.1287785045302; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm3091442qck.1.2010.10.22.15.04.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:03:59 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Message-ID: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on moving forward to common 0.22 trunk. 0.20 was dragging on for quite a long time and, in a sense, create certain imbalance toward 0.20-centric Hadoop environment On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:52PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar > > wrote: > > > >> > but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is= does > >> > the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? be= cause > >> if > >> > it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. > >> > >> What are these "other" reasons ? > > > > yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see wh= y any > >> production cluster should run code from trunk. > >> > >> > > right.. the trunk is not for production use. =E2=95=90I wasn't suggesti= ng that. > > > > but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. > > > > Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move to > > rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-porting = what > > they need to the version they are running on their clusters. > > > > and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be > > forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and har= der > > as the paths diverge. > > > > I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch la= nds > > on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. >=20 > Hey Ian, >=20 > I think we're all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common > branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that > we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). > The open question is whether we try to come up with a common 20-based > branch or wait for 22. That's been previously discussed on this list > and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that we > should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. >=20 > Our current plan is to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested > release with security and append should get users off the current > 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels > that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that > reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in > YDH/CDH) we are willing to create and maintain this branch on Apache. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > =E2=95=90- Milind > > > > -- > > Milind Bhandarkar > > (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) > > (phone: 408-203-5213 W) > > --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzCCk8ACgkQIg9pgB8n5iLT2gCfXD4uGlM6Eeq9kHX6F8cTd/qQ A4AAnRUQy3aV8EMMK30NIjMDoSYk9mTv =lLfH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7-- From general-return-2246-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 22:24:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55180 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 22:24:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 22:24:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 62620 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 22:24:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62511 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 22:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62499 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 22:24:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:24:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:23:54 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9MMMvt7038983 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:22:57 -0700 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:22:56 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: ActyNTAFC388RUo6R+SRWpOXnzISIAAAnzko Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org KzEgZm9yIG1vdmluZyB0byAwLjIyIHRydW5rLg0KDQpUaGFua3MNCm1haGFkZXYNCg0KDQpPbiAx MC8yMi8xMCAzOjAzIFBNLCAiS29uc3RhbnRpbiBCb3VkbmlrIiA8Y29zQGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+IHdy b3RlOg0KDQo+ICsxIG9uIG1vdmluZyBmb3J3YXJkIHRvIGNvbW1vbiAwLjIyIHRydW5rLiAwLjIw IHdhcyBkcmFnZ2luZyBvbiBmb3IgcXVpdGUgYQ0KPiBsb25nIHRpbWUgYW5kLCBpbiBhIHNlbnNl LCBjcmVhdGUgY2VydGFpbiBpbWJhbGFuY2UgdG93YXJkIDAuMjAtY2VudHJpYw0KPiBIYWRvb3Ag ZW52aXJvbm1lbnQNCj4gDQo+IE9uIEZyaSwgT2N0IDIyLCAyMDEwIGF0IDAyOjUyUE0sIEVsaSBD b2xsaW5zIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gT24gVGh1LCBPY3QgMjEsIDIwMTAgYXQgNTo1NCBQTSwgSWFuIEhv bHNtYW4gPGhhZG9vcEBob2xzbWFuLm5ldD4gd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gT24gVGh1LCBPY3QgMjEsIDIw MTAgYXQgODo0MiBQTSwgTWlsaW5kIEEgQmhhbmRhcmthcg0KPj4+IDxtaWxpbmRiQHlhaG9vLWlu Yy5jb20+d3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4+PiBidXQgdGhlIG90aGVyIHF1ZXN0aW9uIEkgaGF2ZSB3 aGljaCBob3BlZnVsbHkgeW91IGd1eXMgY2FuIGFuc3dlciBpcyBkb2VzDQo+Pj4+PiB0aGUgeWFo b28gZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIGhhdmUgQUxMIHRoZSBwYXRjaGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRydW5rIG9uIGl0 PyBiZWNhdXNlDQo+Pj4+IGlmDQo+Pj4+PiBpdCBkb2Vzbid0IEkgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCBpcyBwcm9i bGVtYXRpYyBhcyB3ZWxsIGZvciBvdGhlciByZWFzb25zLg0KPj4+PiANCj4+Pj4gV2hhdCBhcmUg dGhlc2UgIm90aGVyIiByZWFzb25zID8NCj4+PiANCj4+PiB5YWhvbyBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gcnVu cyBvbiBvdXIgcHJvZHVjdGlvbiBjbHVzdGVycywgYW5kIEkgZG8gbm90IHNlZSB3aHkgYW55DQo+ Pj4+IHByb2R1Y3Rpb24gY2x1c3RlciBzaG91bGQgcnVuIGNvZGUgZnJvbSB0cnVuay4NCj4+Pj4g DQo+Pj4+IA0KPj4+IHJpZ2h0Li4gdGhlIHRydW5rIGlzIG5vdCBmb3IgcHJvZHVjdGlvbiB1c2Uu IPn5SSB3YXNuJ3Qgc3VnZ2VzdGluZyB0aGF0Lg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+IGJ1dCB0aGUgdHJ1bmsgaXMg d2hhdCB3aWxsIGV2ZW50dWFsbHkgYmVjb21lIHRoZSBuZXh0IHJlbGVhc2UuDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4g VGhlbiBzb21lb25lIGluIHlhaG9vIHdpbGwgaGF2ZSB0byBkZWNpZGUgaWYgdGhleSBhcmUgZ29p bmcgdG8gbW92ZSB0bw0KPj4+IHJlYmFzZSB0aGVpciBwcm9kdWN0aW9uIGNsdXN0ZXIgdG8gMC4y MSwgb3IganVzdCBjb250aW51ZSBiYWNrLXBvcnRpbmcgd2hhdA0KPj4+IHRoZXkgbmVlZCB0byB0 aGUgdmVyc2lvbiB0aGV5IGFyZSBydW5uaW5nIG9uIHRoZWlyIGNsdXN0ZXJzLg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ IGFuZCBpZiB5YWhvbyBmaXhlcyBhIGJ1ZyBpbiB0aGVpciB2ZXJzaW9uLCBpdCB3b3VsZCBuZWVk IHRvIGJlDQo+Pj4gZm9yd2FyZC1wb3J0ZWQgb3ZlciB0byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCB0cnVuay4gd2hp Y2ggd2lsbCBnZXQgaGFyZGVyIGFuZCBoYXJkZXINCj4+PiBhcyB0aGUgcGF0aHMgZGl2ZXJnZS4N Cj4+PiANCj4+PiBJJ20gc3VyZSB5b3UndmUgc2VlbiBpdCBoYXBwZW4gb24gb3RoZXIgcHJvamVj dHMgd2hlbiBhIG1ham9yIGJyYW5jaCBsYW5kcw0KPj4+IG9uIHRoZSB0cnVuaywgYW5kIHRoZSBh bW91bnQgb2YgZWZmb3J0IGl0IHRha2VzIHRvIHJlY29uY2lsZSB0aGVtLg0KPj4gDQo+PiBIZXkg SWFuLA0KPj4gDQo+PiBJIHRoaW5rIHdlJ3JlIGFsbCBpbiBhZ3JlZW1lbnQgdGhhdCB3ZSBuZWVk IHRvIHJlLWNvbnZlbmUgb24gYSBjb21tb24NCj4+IGJyYW5jaCB0aGF0IHJlbW92ZXMgbW9zdCBv ZiB0aGUgZGVsdGFzIGFnYWluc3QgYW4gQXBhY2hlIHJlbGVhc2UgdGhhdA0KPj4gd2UgaGF2ZSBh bGwgYWNjdW11bGF0ZWQgKHByaW1hcmlseSBzZWN1cml0eSwgYXBwZW5kLCB0cnVuayBiYWNrcG9y dHMpLg0KPj4gVGhlIG9wZW4gcXVlc3Rpb24gaXMgd2hldGhlciB3ZSB0cnkgdG8gY29tZSB1cCB3 aXRoIGEgY29tbW9uIDIwLWJhc2VkDQo+PiBicmFuY2ggb3Igd2FpdCBmb3IgMjIuICBUaGF0J3Mg YmVlbiBwcmV2aW91c2x5IGRpc2N1c3NlZCBvbiB0aGlzIGxpc3QNCj4+IGFuZCB0aGVyZSB3ZXJl IHNvbWUgY29uY2VybnMsIHJlLWl0ZXJhdGVkIG9uIHRoaXMgdGhyZWFkLCB0aGF0IHdlDQo+PiBz aG91bGQgaW52ZXN0IGluIDIyIHJhdGhlciB0aGFuIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IDIwLWJhc2VkIGJyYW5j aGVzLg0KPj4gDQo+PiBPdXIgY3VycmVudCBwbGFuIGlzIHRvIHJlY29udmVuZSB3aXRoIGV2ZXJ5 b25lIG9uIDIyIC0gYSB3ZWxsLXRlc3RlZA0KPj4gcmVsZWFzZSB3aXRoIHNlY3VyaXR5IGFuZCBh cHBlbmQgc2hvdWxkIGdldCB1c2VycyBvZmYgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQNCj4+IDIwLWJhc2VkIGJyYW5j aGVzLiBIb3dldmVyIGlmIHlvdSBhbmQvb3IgdGhlIEFwYWNoZSBjb21tdW5pdHkgZmVlbHMNCj4+ IHRoYXQgdGhlcmUgbmVlZHMgdG8gYmUgYW4gQXBhY2hlIDIwLWJhc2VkIGJyYW5jaCBhbmQgcmVs ZWFzZSB0aGF0DQo+PiByZWZsZWN0cyB3aGF0IHBlb3BsZSBhcmUgdXNpbmcgKHNlY3VyaXR5LCBh cHBlbmQsIHZhcmlvdXMgYmFja3BvcnRzIGluDQo+PiBZREgvQ0RIKSB3ZSBhcmUgd2lsbGluZyB0 byBjcmVhdGUgYW5kIG1haW50YWluIHRoaXMgYnJhbmNoIG9uIEFwYWNoZS4NCj4+IA0KPj4gVGhh bmtzLA0KPj4gRWxpDQo+PiANCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+PiD5+S0gTWlsaW5kDQo+Pj4gDQo+ Pj4gLS0NCj4+PiBNaWxpbmQgQmhhbmRhcmthcg0KPj4+IChtYWlsdG86bWlsaW5kYkB5YWhvby1p bmMuY29tKQ0KPj4+IChwaG9uZTogNDA4LTIwMy01MjEzIFcpDQo+Pj4gDQoNCg== From general-return-2247-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 01:33:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23377 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 01:33:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 01:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 70212 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 01:33:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70087 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 01:33:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70079 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 01:33:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:33:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:33:49 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1538298wyg.35 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:33:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.128.7 with SMTP id i7mr3619430wbs.165.1287797608063; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:33:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:33:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fa506f8a20d04933ebe42 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367fa506f8a20d04933ebe42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. The question then becomes what should be in it. 2010/10/22 Mahadev Konar > +1 for moving to 0.22 trunk. > > Thanks > mahadev > > > On 10/22/10 3:03 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > > +1 on moving forward to common 0.22 trunk. 0.20 was dragging on for qui= te > a > > long time and, in a sense, create certain imbalance toward 0.20-centric > > Hadoop environment > > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:52PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman > wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer i= s > does > >>>>> the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on it? > because > >>>> if > >>>>> it doesn't I think that is problematic as well for other reasons. > >>>> > >>>> What are these "other" reasons ? > >>> > >>> yahoo distribution runs on our production clusters, and I do not see > why any > >>>> production cluster should run code from trunk. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> right.. the trunk is not for production use. =E2=95=90I wasn't sugges= ting that. > >>> > >>> but the trunk is what will eventually become the next release. > >>> > >>> Then someone in yahoo will have to decide if they are going to move t= o > >>> rebase their production cluster to 0.21, or just continue back-portin= g > what > >>> they need to the version they are running on their clusters. > >>> > >>> and if yahoo fixes a bug in their version, it would need to be > >>> forward-ported over to the current trunk. which will get harder and > harder > >>> as the paths diverge. > >>> > >>> I'm sure you've seen it happen on other projects when a major branch > lands > >>> on the trunk, and the amount of effort it takes to reconcile them. > >> > >> Hey Ian, > >> > >> I think we're all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common > >> branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that > >> we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). > >> The open question is whether we try to come up with a common 20-based > >> branch or wait for 22. That's been previously discussed on this list > >> and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that we > >> should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. > >> > >> Our current plan is to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested > >> release with security and append should get users off the current > >> 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels > >> that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that > >> reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in > >> YDH/CDH) we are willing to create and maintain this branch on Apache. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Eli > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> =E2=95=90- Milind > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Milind Bhandarkar > >>> (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) > >>> (phone: 408-203-5213 W) > >>> > > --0016367fa506f8a20d04933ebe42-- From general-return-2248-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 03:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43303 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 03:05:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 03:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 11033 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 03:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10603 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 03:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10592 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 03:04:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:04:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:04:50 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9N34HZo070213 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287803057; bh=nIaTCs5Ldru6huF73/uUzEPS3tK3p6JpNUsF3EcchNo=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=ACozKiqLJiey6r/qjSLP4ewZLKMag+/yjGMkUhn1iqZ233gbT+2CNbMvyO5nh+COF XKXzVYgD/mH8pcbXeLVSbZaRqxVnXc2fQu+f3L8zOxkDYlVtUxJzpAGSXO8AH7VPeD TvxFldDCfVkS2oCJRbOoquC0S71LdEHu4MFUYkQY= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:17 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:15 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: ActyXvpWvOXCIfb4T7iXFR8nO3fr8g== Message-ID: References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. "As Well" ? That means there is something else you want to do, right ? What is it ? You have said in earlier emails that "Yahoo distribution of hadoop not bein= g the same as apache hadoop trunk will cause 'other' problems". Let me ask a yes/no question, based on some of your ambiguous statements in= this thread. Do you want Yahoo! distribution of Hadoop the same as trunk ? - milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2249-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 03:40:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52446 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 03:40:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 03:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 24093 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 03:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23870 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 03:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23862 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 03:40:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:40:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:40:31 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id N3bW1f0041uE5Es583gBAV; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:40:11 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id N3gA1f0011GAoR63c3gBR8; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:40:11 +0000 Message-Id: <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:40:08 -0700 References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. > The question then becomes what should be in it. I've had better luck with time-based releases rather than feature- based releases for open source projects. The current plan of record is to make cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. -- Owen From general-return-2250-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 08:49:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27784 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 08:49:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 08:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 32315 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 08:49:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32095 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 08:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32078 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 08:49:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:49:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.161] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:48:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1287823706; l=1367; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=VLDpqHQtmmAywYl6UiW0BfrWWmo=; b=FOgGkHJSTJRMBntNmv1Q5rBb/Qyk8EuUEknNrS0EwoUuskS1yRrDAVRIqg04jTo5uWA wVacgIGUSdVIGqjLhCjwHBz6QlxkYRtRO+IUdoeGf0rz0fDh2Lq5h64MOqcBkNkd9uAGA HCTnWa+RZMY71VZeeIfADOnOQiarmccxqNs= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpAGK2qzNLPg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180157201.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.157.201]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo45) (RZmta 23.5) with ESMTP id 603997m9N4CTyW for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:48:26 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4CC2A158.6050202@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:48:24 +0200 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 22.10.10 23:52, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hey Ian, > > I think we're all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common > branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that > we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). > The open question is whether we try to come up with a common 20-based > branch or wait for 22. That's been previously discussed on this list > and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that we > should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. > > Our current plan is to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested > release with security and append should get users off the current > 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels > that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that > reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in > YDH/CDH) we are willing to create and maintain this branch on Apache. > > Thanks, > Eli Eli, You are using "we" and "our" placeholders a lot in the last two paragraphs and my brain's parser is failing to resolve them correctly - please can you clarify where you speak of "we" the community/the PMC/Cloudera/Yahoo/somebody else respectively. Thank you, Bernd From general-return-2251-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 09:25:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35778 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 09:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 09:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 46667 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 09:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46232 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 09:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46224 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 09:25:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:25:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:25:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1287825889; l=1627; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=AbPjpMdRbOsbHJ+ihDXV60cl5RQ=; b=FsgiC//9CwfEZZfxYsHBdXs9xbZ1C0FQGsyriJZJ4T4nVdHpThIE1ptEf8qsYfUKSGM FF/kD9a5E/mcOalQ3J+Y3URfECfqsTOkx08FxPixVcM0pUCaEFbrfETYZvIgGUI46xbKU tPma8h6Xf2wRh8yP1MEwR4tbryUCSsx1zW4= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpAGK2qzNLPg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180157201.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.157.201]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo9) (RZmta 23.5) with ESMTP id m04cb1m9N56wae for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:24:49 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4CC2A9E1.1020909@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:24:49 +0200 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23.10.10 05:04, Milind A Bhandarkar wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. > > "As Well" ? That means there is something else you want to do, right ? > > What is it ? > > You have said in earlier emails that "Yahoo distribution of hadoop not being the same as apache hadoop trunk will cause 'other' problems". > > Let me ask a yes/no question, based on some of your ambiguous statements in this thread. > > Do you want Yahoo! distribution of Hadoop the same as trunk ? (You didn't ask me but FWIW) I don't think the Hadoop community can mandadate or even should care what a company will put in their downstream distributions. After all, this is Apache-licensed code. Individuals who work on Hadoop and commercial derivatives of Hadoop at the same time might be in a different position, but that's basically their problem. Side note: Here at Apache it is common to prefix a statement with "with my PMC hat on...", "with my board hat on...", "with my $EMPLOYER hat on...". So, with my ASF member hat on, I'd say that the Hadoop project is only tasked with working on Apache premises (Apache mailing lists, svn, wikis, etc). Currently, this community is by far too much concerned with what downstream projects are doing with the code. Reason: Currently Hadoop looks like a downstream project from others. This is very very bad and has to be turned around. How to get there? 1. Firmly put your Apache contributor head on 2. Integrate all the pending code committers are willing to contribute 3. Release. Bernd From general-return-2252-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 09:28:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35943 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 09:28:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 09:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 47906 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 09:28:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47837 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 09:28:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47829 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 09:28:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:28:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:28:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1287826086; l=272; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=oNpXv2VNHSAFyz06rgM0OJDHBug=; b=cyXJqzLee+ACa4/JwjpnT8K6sY/77OUka4KeLehWK8FPxVSvXW7az0Z5iV+elieqzf6 Q4sn3EygSyLLDewLeN4lHsqRs10x2xIvmwgbv6rS5w0d1S8SMK8Ch6/O772JbbCLLE4rM ow31mTC31XQRWGi4EC4vj1tPJtbHNR5Gwsc= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpAGK2qzNLPg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180157201.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.157.201]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo41) (RZmta 23.5) with ESMTP id i073f9m9N97Y3O for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:28:06 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:28:06 +0200 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23.10.10 05:40, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The current plan of record is to make > cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. I'd like to revisit the mailing list thread where this decision was made. Can you point me to it? Thanks a lot, Bernd From general-return-2253-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 10:45:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55379 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 10:45:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 10:45:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 83478 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 10:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83204 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 10:45:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83196 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 10:45:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:45:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:45:13 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so1638018wwi.29 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:44:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.166.68 with SMTP id f46mr608324wel.26.1287830692230; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:44:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 06:44:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9481ef0f4e00493467218 --001485f9481ef0f4e00493467218 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. > > "As Well" ? That means there is something else you want to do, right ? > as well as in I agree with the other people who want to have a 0.22 release, as opposed to wanting to have another 0.20 release. > > What is it ? > > You have said in earlier emails that "Yahoo distribution of hadoop not > being the same as apache hadoop trunk will cause 'other' problems". > I'm picking on yahoo here, but the same could be said for cloudera as well. > > Let me ask a yes/no question, based on some of your ambiguous statements in > this thread. > > Do you want Yahoo! distribution of Hadoop the same as trunk ? > I want the Yahoo & Cloudera distributions of hadoop to be as close as possible to the released version of apache hadoop. I want Yahoo (and others) to look at the apache release and be able say we can use this on our own cluster, and not have to maintain their 500 or so patches on top of the standard release. I want to get the 0.22 (and future) apache releases to a point where the internal Yahoo developers start asking themselves if they should switch, and if there is a need for them to maintain their github release at all. and like Bernd says, I don't have the power to dictate what Yahoo runs on their cluster internally, neither do I want it. As a user I was quite pleased when Yahoo and Cloudera put their versions out there. It was tremendously helpful to me getting my shit done, but by them doing so it told me (by the fact that they had to release it, and how different they were) that I shouldn't be running on a standard apache release. To repeat for those who think I write vaguely. I want to remove the need for multiple distributions. which back to the original thread: one approach suggested to resolve the multiple branches is to do releases frequently, but in order to do that we have need to things in place to help test the releases quickly so as to ensure the quality is there. > - milind > > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) > (phone: 408-203-5213 W) > > > --001485f9481ef0f4e00493467218-- From general-return-2254-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 15:48:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30179 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 15:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 15:48:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 67759 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 15:48:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67693 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 15:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67685 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 15:48:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:48:23 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=kOcbAwdkQA9WBRP5IM+59bDxv2oHtmM1It6e78TQO0hJqPlIMQ50Ku2m 7v9hk0wiknF7WDGBqax9ZWeivJiomNs/mjmdYZfngTNSbKtwKmsyN6p9s EpLP2BoSNfctWqY; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1287848902; x=1319384902; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20bringing=20the=20codebases=20back=20in =20line|Date:=20Sat,=2023=20Oct=202010=2015:48:02=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<65B0683A-127A-475D-B532-E14582A617F7@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<935D9AEBCCA251468BD7BEF017FCBAB1@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> |References:=20<20101022220359.GE17626@tp>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20 <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org>=0D=0A =20<4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de>; bh=3Cabaw/1TCQCw8WTyttq770/Uf9AcYIPk8nrClHyMg4=; b=aW3bsDmJGkt8KUU0JdDCcDNx6gRjL7SCO1xUqOpXV1h00HJOCg+7ulfq cWjX6MEchFq8+oM8T2vLMr+5e/q0E1ATnf+FyZAR4KakdjHDc8bkR/pGq if351dV/EnPUUN+; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,228,1286175600"; d="scan'208";a="15936993" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:48:02 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: AQHLcVQVuqCpAAO/eUm8zw+IHmCpg5NMbtAAgAAGVQCAABMKAIAADmMAgAADdICAAV9hgIAAA1eAgAAFTACAADU7gIAAI2UAgABhOACAAGomgA== Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:48:02 +0000 Message-ID: <65B0683A-127A-475D-B532-E14582A617F7@linkedin.com> References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> In-Reply-To: <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <935D9AEBCCA251468BD7BEF017FCBAB1@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On 23.10.10 05:40, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>=20 >> The current plan of record is to make >> cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. >=20 > I'd like to revisit the mailing list thread where this decision was made.= Can you point me to it? While you are looking for threads, can you point me to the one where the A= SF board announced the very heavy handed VP change to the Hadoop community?= = From general-return-2255-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 16:11:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38596 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 16:11:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 16:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 91061 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 16:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91006 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 16:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90998 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 16:11:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:11:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:11:09 +0000 Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NDD71f0041c6gX851GApBv; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:10:49 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NGAo1f0011GAoR63jGApoa; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:10:49 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-305401955 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:10:47 -0700 References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-1-305401955 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On 23.10.10 05:40, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> The current plan of record is to make >> cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. > > I'd like to revisit the mailing list thread where this decision was > made. Can you point me to it? Sure. http://www.mail-archive.com/common-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg01388.html -- Owen --Apple-Mail-1-305401955-- From general-return-2256-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 18:23:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72320 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 18:23:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 18:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 64665 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64622 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64614 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 18:23:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:23:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:23:49 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o9NIN3a3013840 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:23:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287858183; bh=MidFLmk2BcKaTQbZyLTG5dnLmcDuAb/0bsAavJsva88=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=gkrtOjLUH6PF9HPl/fE36IwtMyr2rCK3zwrhEYGt9+Pt/3HdGjEcHbGnnh2hf1gXR p11S7n13flPfHHWU1f6NStWsPYuVuVxDq2MUZM0MRJpFwC+GDTWodkg4UU0xGe0e2n O7lZ1hrN9qrKISsj5+NAU8wsS1oRoFD64z+PCbQk= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:23:03 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:23:02 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: Acty31SDppkCVt2JTNGuZrm2jIAQQg== Message-ID: References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > as well as in I agree with the other people who want to have a 0.22 relea= se, > as opposed to wanting to have another 0.20 release. +1 ! - Milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2257-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 18:26:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72660 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 18:26:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 18:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 66675 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66598 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66590 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 18:26:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:26:04 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9NIPHbN072038 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1287858318; bh=g+XMG0LiwwtZIvQsotmBxSiEKUe6hWDZCx6i2XXqFzk=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=HupCLLWawU51MssPMziX8uUcK0sPKE3ZS8abhdsqFoNj1jx0iO6tu/1Bl3FVINPSs x+HXOkOMwPDKBk6nbKtc2GlSA8ux9TXt9Rlhihy42wK5dzSZrGFnCLqmd5O3TKrt4Q A2+ynUmINy646hXyIp7PpoQ3Mlor3x+cuBTHLcjA= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:25:17 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:25:16 -0700 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Topic: bringing the codebases back in line Thread-Index: Acty36PrgYZsEPNVSxOxMJs5yFfQ0A== Message-ID: <76E09703-7610-4A87-9F0A-4770F5027B32@yahoo-inc.com> References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <4CC2A9E1.1020909@brainlounge.de> In-Reply-To: <4CC2A9E1.1020909@brainlounge.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >=20 > Side note: Here at Apache it is common to prefix a statement with "with=20 > my PMC hat on...", "with my board hat on...", "with my $EMPLOYER hat on..= .". I have my "user of yahoo distribution of hadoop" hat on. - milind -- Milind Bhandarkar (mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com) (phone: 408-203-5213 W) From general-return-2258-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 18:51:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75825 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 18:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 18:51:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 75495 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75295 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 18:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75287 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 18:51:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:51:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:50:54 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so408049qyk.14 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:50:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.223.149 with SMTP id ik21mr3818082qcb.224.1287859832895; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.15.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:50:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CC2A158.6050202@brainlounge.de> References: <4CC0BC80.6050303@apache.org> <211EF221-CFC5-42A5-99AD-339F120333D1@apache.org> <4CC2A158.6050202@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:50:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Bernd Fondermann w= rote: > On 22.10.10 23:52, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman =A0wrot= e: >> Hey Ian, >> >> I think we're all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common >> branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that >> we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). >> The open question is whether we try to come up with a common 20-based >> branch or wait for 22. =A0That's been previously discussed on this list >> and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that we >> should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. >> >> Our current plan is to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested >> release with security and append should get users off the current >> 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels >> that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that >> reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in >> YDH/CDH) we are willing to create and maintain this branch on Apache. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > > Eli, > > You are using "we" and "our" placeholders a lot in the last two paragraph= s > and my brain's parser is failing to resolve them correctly - please can y= ou > clarify where you speak of "we" the community/the > PMC/Cloudera/Yahoo/somebody else respectively. > > Thank you, > > =A0Bernd > Hey Bernd, Apologies for the confusion, I see your point. This is hopefully more clear= : I think the *Hadoop contributors* are all in agreement that we need to re-convene on a common branch that removes most of the deltas against an Apache release that we have all accumulated (primarily security, append, trunk backports). The open question is whether *those of us that maintain 20-based branches (used internally or distributed)* try to come up with a common 20-based branch or wait for 22. That's been previously discussed on this list and there were some concerns, re-iterated on this thread, that *Hadoop contributors* should invest in 22 rather than the current 20-based branches. *Those of us who maintain Cloudera's 20-based branch* would like to reconvene with everyone on 22 - a well-tested release from trunk with security and append should get users off the current 20-based branches. However if you and/or the Apache community feels that there needs to be an Apache 20-based branch and release that reflects what people are using (security, append, various backports in YDH/CDH), *those of us who maintain Cloudera's 20-based branch* are willing to create and maintain this branch at Apache. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2259-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 19:04:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77121 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 19:04:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 19:04:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 86972 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:04:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86922 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:04:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86914 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 19:04:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:04:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:04:10 +0000 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so538187qyk.14 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.149 with SMTP id s21mr631817qcl.234.1287860628933; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.15.70 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:03:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:03:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well. >> The question then becomes what should be in it. > > I've had better luck with time-based releases rather than feature-based > releases for open source projects. The current plan of record is to make cut > a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. > > -- Owen Great. At the contributor's meetup it sounded like the plan of record was to hold 22 for HDFS-1052. Speaking of which does someone have notes to post to the list/wiki? It would be great to see the project move to periodic time-based releases. In previous discussion it seemed like feature-based releases were favored: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@hadoop.apache.org/msg01022.html Thanks, Eli From general-return-2260-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 19:21:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83254 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 19:21:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 19:21:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 93852 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93790 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93782 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 19:21:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:21:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.160] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:20:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1287861636; l=1262; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=Y/T026B2HseCLFQw2Dq5LqL3CNQ=; b=WSMycfLFoWoN7K18gsfyCIal+LcTTRI8tfAirUASuH9jt2JOuPs5MGh+oP+EPiR4oJo DdtjO/W3D9GOrY41xRLgSjHEtYNwiHHqRMpwmSQuZwX91zfUEwGJa4Fkg9w2wixRLX9Dq r27EZrUsv2TPDTHfpoL6cb/QBJ1NN88b21Y= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpA2aQKnqZIA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180163140.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.163.140]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo1) (RZmta 24.1) with ESMTP id e027ddm9NIhvqz for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:20:35 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4CC33582.6080400@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:20:34 +0200 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> <65B0683A-127A-475D-B532-E14582A617F7@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <65B0683A-127A-475D-B532-E14582A617F7@linkedin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23.10.10 17:48, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > >> On 23.10.10 05:40, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> The current plan of record is to make >>> cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. >> >> I'd like to revisit the mailing list thread where this decision was made. Can you point me to it? > > > While you are looking for threads, can you point me to the one where the ASF board announced the very heavy handed VP change to the Hadoop community? Sure, but you'd have to be a committer at the ASF to have access to it: Message-ID: <4CBF4DE8.8060907@apache.org> 20.10.10 13:15 -0700 - committers@apache.org: "ASF Board Meeting Summary - October 20, 2010" PMC chair changes are never announced to a broader audience, AFAICR. There are other things which currently trouble the ASF community way more than this VP change, as every Apache committer can read there and which is subject to a press release for everyone to read. What I learned when talking to users of ASF projects over the years is that they mostly don't even know what PMCs are all about, and thus they don't care about VPs. All they care about is features, releases, documentation and support. Bernd From general-return-2261-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 19:25:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83537 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 19:25:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 19:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 95311 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95264 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 19:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95256 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 19:25:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:20 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1287861899; l=538; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=H66JhTQEbjVQb28/aX6KPXpZR+Y=; b=ljUaB6dN3V5HsW1phVOXsZnIqnkF7uHpCDcwlifoxOOY18lnrTbuDSmKVH6j4ttHElO cRYXsCrDWu5l+R0M9zHK3GHSCy/XtsSDDmwD8Flb6ikg7lMkDbjJ6Doc9rNd0Qk9HyUGZ IPr1v1CBmH1ak6RITNp0NLTks9aST7Gdcsk= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpA2aQKnqZIA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180163140.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.163.140]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo61) (RZmta 23.5) with ESMTP id o03673m9NHS0YI for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:24:59 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4CC3368B.9030200@brainlounge.de> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:24:59 +0200 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line References: <20101022220359.GE17626@tp> <79F839A8-B258-467A-8B57-B7F4D09A4FC9@apache.org> <4CC2AAA6.8090605@brainlounge.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23.10.10 18:10, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > >> On 23.10.10 05:40, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> The current plan of record is to make >>> cut a branch next month, stabilize it, and release it. >> >> I'd like to revisit the mailing list thread where this decision was >> made. Can you point me to it? > > Sure. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/common-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg01388.html Thanks, I wouldn't have been able to track that down myself so easily. Bernd From general-return-2262-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 23 22:28:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22860 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 22:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 22:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 91361 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 22:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91311 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2010 22:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91303 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2010 22:28:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vijaymadhavan23@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:28:05 +0000 Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so2136896gwb.35 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:27:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:subject:message-id:from :to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nExg71r6l/KXljAe+cLO1YUxeYvaKPFW8D6JgY2dw6w=; b=nmXipMqaIzb68eEJERJ9ZRehR1rNzoDn83lQJK9QHPTDS4/5P9clfKM7PYMPJWR0Vy 6cdgfA+EedTRZyQLAA9xeFtafWjYNEcwwP6/GzlcfXeq+7KXdOmuhg09JGaA3BkpQQKv /tscBjib8h1xiNdOD27zKk8yt4Lc6Op3wV0S0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:subject:message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=spRHpvGb3v+AtdAbAuVV++IFxUR6IGJ5qlZgBkoZWCh4+m7kB9Rw0xQYnMFji3Taxd dMlcEIIGcSkaaD3CAusF8jRYqWKcO0gFKHdusonzzz3Hkuv1rHI0SAgW4W5DGpNg+QQY nYVvCwDRC9iPO3qy54JFqd2z8gg1yaGFp/LSI= Received: by 10.150.159.19 with SMTP id h19mr9333994ybe.340.1287872864642; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (134.sub-97-11-209.myvzw.com [97.11.209.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m66sm3864287yha.21.2010.10.23.15.27.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:26:51 -0400 Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line Message-ID: From: Vijay Madhavan To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org CgpFbGkgQ29sbGlucyA8ZWxpQGNsb3VkZXJhLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6Cgo+T24gRnJpLCBPY3QgMjIs IDIwMTAgYXQgODo0MCBQTSwgT3dlbiBPJ01hbGxleSA8b21hbGxleUBhcGFjaGUub3JnPiB3cm90 ZToKPj4KPj4gT24gT2N0IDIyLCAyMDEwLCBhdCA2OjMzIFBNLCBJYW4gSG9sc21hbiB3cm90ZToK Pj4KPj4+IEkgdGhpbmsgd2Ugc2hvdWxkIHB1c2ggZm9yd2FyZCB0byAwLjIyIGFzIHdlbGwuCj4+ PiBUaGUgcXVlc3Rpb24gdGhlbiBiZWNvbWVzIHdoYXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGluIGl0Lgo+Pgo+PiBJ J3ZlIGhhZCBiZXR0ZXIgbHVjayB3aXRoIHRpbWUtYmFzZWQgcmVsZWFzZXMgcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4g ZmVhdHVyZS1iYXNlZAo+PiByZWxlYXNlcyBmb3Igb3BlbiBzb3VyY2UgcHJvamVjdHMuIFRoZSBj dXJyZW50IHBsYW4gb2YgcmVjb3JkIGlzIHRvIG1ha2UgY3V0Cj4+IGEgYnJhbmNoIG5leHQgbW9u dGgsIHN0YWJpbGl6ZSBpdCwgYW5kIHJlbGVhc2UgaXQuCj4+Cj4+IC0tIE93ZW4KPgo+R3JlYXQu ICBBdCB0aGUgY29udHJpYnV0b3IncyBtZWV0dXAgaXQgc291bmRlZCBsaWtlIHRoZSBwbGFuIG9m IHJlY29yZAo+d2FzIHRvIGhvbGQgMjIgZm9yIEhERlMtMTA1Mi4gIFNwZWFraW5nIG9mIHdoaWNo IGRvZXMgc29tZW9uZSBoYXZlCj5ub3RlcyB0byBwb3N0IHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0L3dpa2k/Cj4KPkl0 IHdvdWxkIGJlIGdyZWF0IHRvIHNlZSB0aGUgcHJvamVjdCBtb3ZlIHRvIHBlcmlvZGljIHRpbWUt YmFzZWQKPnJlbGVhc2VzLiAgSW4gcHJldmlvdXMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBpdCBzZWVtZWQgbGlrZSBm ZWF0dXJlLWJhc2VkCj5yZWxlYXNlcyB3ZXJlIGZhdm9yZWQ6Cj5odHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1haWwtYXJj aGl2ZS5jb20vZ2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy9tc2cwMTAyMi5odG1sCj4KPlRoYW5r cywKPkVsaQo= From general-return-2263-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 09:37:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40995 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 09:37:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 09:37:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 39118 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:37:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38646 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39433 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 04:42:43 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ankit.g1290@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BRHoCUMNMtpow5dTVhHhlb3SPKUhx4QOowdnZef/w3M=; b=XlndyAjZDd6eRSYj/w6xJuAyV/3A2N4vXHrcG58a2OdyppW+unHkVFSXctLSIz4yLy hbmNOwWsaMNAe8hybmBMGKYOZEABMT2u3XkN7znNMT41MlYyGl9ZYaP4RN4Zis0KA9pq h1GrxOiqyaII9fU/hGkRQFwBfK1+cSmf5AG68= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=stBGvAuTk2wCExPBE9w91mC8HxrXRfybAxqhXV0hNP0lY2y03vSasYARLlLQGBbn1A 4y+YvCmjJFg9qO5Cm2nm3h0cP2id93fFiXXoor8ZiDVhcMkltyGeZ1ylID7lAJ1uV/eT aWSr9t21HOr5smcPhWH4ss7E1LdJJbTEHAjCY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:12:15 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Running jar files inside map task From: Ankit Gandhi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64816d6c80e0493699d38 --0016e6d64816d6c80e0493699d38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not because I have to use the output of that file in my map task. I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distributed mode. Thanks in advance -- Ankit Gandhi Undergraduate Center for Visual Information Technology Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree IIIT-Hyderabad --0016e6d64816d6c80e0493699d38-- From general-return-2264-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 09:50:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44132 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 09:50:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 09:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 51876 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:50:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51630 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:50:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51622 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 09:50:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:50:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:49:56 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2945545fxm.35 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:49:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=H1/ktSNFUTSWfnRVbrAyjX1Jpk6TAK0+uOf2K4AQkB0=; b=Gb67+ARegEwjAML7AXasL2PfVCfnEUcA4TPrIZxGVrCZZyw71DLAJ4IxkZNROmbE5/ y7DFRAjtySHPy8+KPT89mVGUa3EovoUAtbVxTAV1vDqoe1RdR+8zMI1GylQ9Zq1iiALn oJzwz7DA6N4uO08HY2zbiCCdmfUsXo1t31spc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=q4Qioht1A0khIVPcs92tSlT2kGMrfX+lLeQ4KWHYSeVisctmIKAJf533U8tlnZvgFA 9RXBxOuFR5TKiYF/DEgjBt7i0A12ziYAxkHSkXV94MiXQm93Z2EpkS7FJCuTm0yxRt8o S1X9OlNzTtBveju7+hT9VToWyNQagQ7dmd8KY= Received: by 10.102.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr5094165mug.33.1288000175386; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:49:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.112.66 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:49:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:19:15 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is DistributedCache what you're looking for? http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/api/org/apache/hadoop/filecache/DistributedCache.html On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Ankit Gandhi wrote: > Hey, > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not because > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distributed > mode. > Thanks in advance > > -- > Ankit Gandhi > Undergraduate > Center for Visual Information Technology > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree > IIIT-Hyderabad > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2265-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 09:55:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45415 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 09:55:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 09:55:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 63846 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:55:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63663 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 09:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63655 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 09:55:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.142] (HELO EXSMTP012-11.exch012.intermedia.net) (64.78.17.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:55:36 +0000 Received: from EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net ([10.254.2.76]) by EXSMTP012-11.exch012.intermedia.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:55:15 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BpeG CACD CH4S CeOt D+rb D/Lr Enxd E9Ey GZhj GyLy IPzG IrOJ ItEH JQfs JVOC J4Lo;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{0CFAD3D1-F059-4109-945F-823C6F86D5E4};YQBuAGkAcgB1AGQAZABoAGEAQABrAHIAaQBsAGwAaQBvAG4ALgBjAG8AbQA=;Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:55:06 GMT;WABtAGwASQBuAHAAdQB0AEYAbwByAG0AYQB0AA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB742A.B8FE48FF" x-cr-puzzleid: {0CFAD3D1-F059-4109-945F-823C6F86D5E4} Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: XmlInputFormat Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:55:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: XmlInputFormat Thread-Index: Act0KrOHGJhG1P+ET8OWhqBUMqL2qg== From: "Aniruddha" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2010 09:55:15.0886 (UTC) FILETIME=[B97174E0:01CB742A] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB742A.B8FE48FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 I am having trouble with using xml text as input, I had tried with "org.apache.mahout.classifier.bayes. XmlInputFormat", but no luck. I am not getting any input in mapper. Did anybody have success to use XmlInputFormat. Please reply me. I am really stuck with this issue =20 Thanks & Regards, Aniruddha ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB742A.B8FE48FF-- From general-return-2266-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 04:16:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85695 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 04:16:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 04:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 68908 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 04:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68412 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 04:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68400 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 04:16:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:16:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:16:34 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3994710fxm.35 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R6nqxmTONMeix+0iKH4QcM+Ek2uePWrHRseFRpITPSI=; b=CO5p9br5sP/Q9cLsoFYNyw4vrAM67Bb4a8PKQZjQHovKhOufMK/RXciwkwlu6J1XfW KXHkaARRdNsTOwNkb/IQV7pXITzE8+j7zAB1bdEcZ+V5XKclmrpIMnr4DUhfrTTGQ2xm pfTOWANZOtMIPlEnrWHrPEd9uSlhJHXQsO420= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=yAixFB/MYWw7nHqTNNy+AT+qf1niQGMZ09pkRohSX6jTS0bsyMCqOJX72MLxLlufxW eYs1vyL1iGpo0h35/O0WtN9YYgSenyNui9v6YZi9IHqSEWg0lXXIFvLnTrGeyTIzde36 r9hu7ViNy+Pk4REEVNrL5PIT6xSZEYySd4FLY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.93.198 with SMTP id w6mr380523fam.135.1288066572681; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.96.193 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:16:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> References: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:16:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a5578301d804937d5e60 --20cf3054a5578301d804937d5e60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Refer to previous discussion entitled 'Hadoop and XML' On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Aniruddha wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am having trouble with using xml text as input, I had tried with > "org.apache.mahout.classifier.bayes. XmlInputFormat", but no luck. I am > not getting any input in mapper. Did anybody have success to use > XmlInputFormat. Please reply me. I am really stuck with this issue > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Aniruddha > > --20cf3054a5578301d804937d5e60-- From general-return-2267-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 07:45:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52210 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 07:45:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 07:45:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 53878 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 07:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53529 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 07:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53288 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 07:45:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.165] (HELO exsmtp012-1.exch012.intermedia.net) (64.78.17.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:45:15 +0000 Received: from EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net ([10.254.2.76]) by exsmtp012-1.exch012.intermedia.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:44:55 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: XmlInputFormat Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:44:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8F26B@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: XmlInputFormat Thread-Index: Act0xJpUxHzFpLyASUuzh3bsub+mTQAHNkCg References: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> From: "Aniruddha" To: , "Ted Yu" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2010 07:44:55.0012 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE408A40:01CB74E1] Please give me some links. I m new to hadoop as well as also new how this email discussion goes -----Original Message----- From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 26 October 2010 09:46 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat Refer to previous discussion entitled 'Hadoop and XML' On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Aniruddha wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am having trouble with using xml text as input, I had tried with > "org.apache.mahout.classifier.bayes. XmlInputFormat", but no luck. I am > not getting any input in mapper. Did anybody have success to use > XmlInputFormat. Please reply me. I am really stuck with this issue > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Aniruddha > > From general-return-2268-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 09:06:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97226 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 09:06:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 09:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 41531 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 09:06:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41100 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 09:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41084 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 09:06:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:06:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:06:11 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4192351fxm.35 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:05:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GQfkIOWBI43C3fQ4kaeErTE+Alsm3GGK9HZXlUlpQDo=; b=d5gRbVvW5rlI87ze8zZwbbWNskM069MynStcH79RpYwB7Uh3s2qhj4MQpJTqgISBmo nt1ospjVeRPxsla5RDt4YudOEF76zjpl63tdpT+f4OB/51+/LXtbMtIcc8BStcgXyqvi fXoxIv6+9WHaichvPl/xYg810tNL2qvkmwJF8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=WFBDyhIo7xjC2O9z3pcL/Exow1turzLaL+9GObQyM1l0Zvh6heGos/qtMFEdkr4Val LwBkaJu8doBOQJTbS/WeA30VAk93il74uNZYxAGm9/94aM7ug9x/bghrxaGpYaoxK07B pdc2A2yqmDtcKRY7lltQ06Epl7K+IgmvvZCHg= Received: by 10.223.75.207 with SMTP id z15mr563639faj.12.1288083951018; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:05:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.80 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:05:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8F26B@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> References: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8F26B@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:35:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Aniruddha wrote: > Please give me some links. I m new to hadoop as well as also new how > this email discussion goes > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > Sent: 26 October 2010 09:46 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat > > Refer to previous discussion entitled 'Hadoop and XML' Here's the thread archive at OS Dir: http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2010-07/msg00102.html > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Aniruddha > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am having trouble with using xml text as input, I had tried with >> "org.apache.mahout.classifier.bayes. XmlInputFormat", but no luck. I > am >> not getting any input in mapper. Did anybody have success to use >> XmlInputFormat. Please reply me. I am really stuck with this issue >> >> >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> Aniruddha >> >> > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2269-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:50:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79441 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:50:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:50:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 4397 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4325 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:50:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:50:21 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so2738488ewy.35 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GIG1tmOr0QbQH4rhpF7776hzMu0VeIOzoCJ2u0lMofU=; b=PpU4WpSAbtlrYHcNEcuoWMRPO82GGr+BpLNdQzMEkun5O1fqBWUk+HPZJU/ay1cVAd 21XqvnnKcq/l6DsALkxkyyr2WvnTsotndji0wxKlo50obqOWf/KO8RWQO1KPyeNqKifZ xIIhQTrY8DohQq7jkkQpcFrJYuHfoqfcAGR6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WnQy0bEkuAnIvELu97M0laIEjsuhs4NQoPTeGk4fGjJy/pFrCiObQC+Lh1ilnMp59t B1KzgEozmbN9G2P8gZ9U59g1rUaPTHC9ZZWnJRIfVn6RQT4wSn2aEtkntDUD7DE2Vx1o 7XvswON+LeL55aORZYHllmso7MWD8untQFlGc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.3 with SMTP id 3mr2302011wew.89.1288129801037; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.64.78 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:50:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d206b37271404938c171f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364d206b37271404938c171f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance available, it will be nice if we can try it out. https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review Hadoop JIRAS. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 thanks, dhruba --0016364d206b37271404938c171f-- From general-return-2270-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 22:39:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97639 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 22:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 22:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 47727 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47643 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47635 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 22:39:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:39:24 +0000 Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so4408qwb.35 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:39:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.92.20 with SMTP id p20mr8270456qcm.280.1288132743425; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.15.70 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > available, it will be nice if we can try it out. +1 Thanks Dhruba. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2271-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 22:40:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97901 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 22:40:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 22:40:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 49570 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49325 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49317 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 22:40:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:40:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:40:17 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so3178263qyk.14 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:39:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.207.71 with SMTP id fx7mr1898411qab.309.1288132736506; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.15.70 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:38:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > available, it will be nice if we can try it out. +1 Thanks Dhruba. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2272-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 22:50:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99519 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 22:50:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 22:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 55809 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:50:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55606 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 22:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55598 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 22:50:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:49:59 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9QMnM3t015292 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:49:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1288133362; bh=4OmSYB8vvOGjSoI/+ssieHwMKowlfwFQysQO1EVtBwg=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=aXBxKgHa91f0vgDUzef/zryMESqhjupVgvIHWGscuzTgseFgTpsmzd5M0iY6KBItL c+eJQE3qiHrDbyMrfaeHMVS6TYQjfTQqxogFZ6G7W5wFnTcKNnQFqdnlarAlT3yGvb TJ4JWJoxJ73xjGRNwuqXVeSfqicWtjFHUkHJ1fzs= Message-Id: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:49:22 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the > > I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review > Hadoop JIRAS. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > > thanks, > dhruba From general-return-2273-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 02:02:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91031 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 02:02:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 02:02:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2503 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 02:02:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2395 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 02:02:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2387 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 02:02:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:02:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:02:33 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so173761wyg.35 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:02:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.53.205 with SMTP id g55mr159001wec.112.1288144930878; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kumar@bike.snu.ac.kr Received: by 10.216.133.161 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:02:10 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BgpdWzmRroWWlQIRwa5NF1nBUw8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task From: Kumar Harshit To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db5bee0636a904938f9dab --0016e6db5bee0636a904938f9dab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You can create 2nd map reduce job. The input to the mapper of 2nd Map Reduce job is the output of 1st Map Reduce job. This way you can tackle the issue. Hope it helps Kumar On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ankit Gandhi wrote: > Hey, > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not > because > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distributed > mode. > Thanks in advance > > -- > Ankit Gandhi > Undergraduate > Center for Visual Information Technology > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree > IIIT-Hyderabad > --0016e6db5bee0636a904938f9dab-- From general-return-2274-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 07:23:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39855 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 07:23:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 07:23:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 44176 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 07:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44117 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 07:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44109 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 07:22:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:22:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gaur.vbagga@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:22:52 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so377509wyg.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:22:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=K21V6I46AdpKV6AMAPIBlzSuwpXgTr50EAtPZG0JRAM=; b=Q5cPKJ/bAnqRjEL80KfNltdDRMFNE/4I3BEOFEGFWrdcJh3nNt1BUqbItj66343too BrmS+mKxEIIuqYZjrBkxllYcJq7jG66SyovEGIOIPPho9g5gLDfCzism9pmrbJJYxurE sZJKaL4rMxnHGl0Bw5rJCz3nXMU50nhD7r1LY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=RfWCHJC0BNmpxNt2XWhbD/Qyc7t/pm1Y2kOIcpnnbOuhps5wJhZKtC2fJuN8H6rVpL fV5jfRhFRXUW9VF1SlthpTJRGZSHkqH0lf+EcArmWaG9n8XYN+JIMIcbsG6Fd6zkuLDk cpZxq6HviexkrUNqk8pWCOg0Ve1b1E7hE4OLU= Received: by 10.216.168.202 with SMTP id k52mr8560008wel.105.1288164150966; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:22:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.69.142 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:22:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: gaurav bagga Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:22:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f631bea17aa00493941654 --001485f631bea17aa00493941654 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It would be great if you could tell or point me to an article which uses the output of first map reduce as input for the 2nd map reduce. -Gaurav On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Kumar Harshit wrote: > You can create 2nd map reduce job. The input to the mapper of 2nd Map > Reduce > job is the output of 1st Map Reduce job. This way you can tackle the issue. > > Hope it helps > > Kumar > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ankit Gandhi > wrote: > > > Hey, > > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not > > because > > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. > > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distributed > > mode. > > Thanks in advance > > > > -- > > Ankit Gandhi > > Undergraduate > > Center for Visual Information Technology > > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree > > IIIT-Hyderabad > > > --001485f631bea17aa00493941654-- From general-return-2275-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 09:16:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93607 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 09:16:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 09:16:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 218 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 09:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99703 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 09:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99695 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 09:16:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:16:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:16:30 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1303848wwi.5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:16:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.48.196 with SMTP id v46mr536149web.28.1288170968546; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kumar@bike.snu.ac.kr Received: by 10.216.133.161 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:16:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:16:08 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vkAdqKnGx5SPMWAUMtPFVSpjzKQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task From: Kumar Harshit To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6ce1efd8a8c049395ac3a --001485f6ce1efd8a8c049395ac3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think this is not difficult. Let me give an example here. There are two Map Reduce job, MR1 and MR2. MR1 has Map1 and Reduce1 as mapper and reducer. MR2 has Map2 and Reduce2 as mapper and reducer. MR1 input directory is Input1 and output directory is Output1 MR2 input directory is Output1 (*this makes sure that Output of MR1 is input to MR2*) and output directory is MR2. In the main() function of MR1, specify the paths of input directory and output directory: setInputPaths(new Path("Input1")); setOutputPaths(new Path("Output1")); In the main() function of MR2, specify the path of input directory and output directory *setInputPaths(new Path("Output1")); //Note that, the Output directory of Previous MR1 is now the input directory o* setOutputPaths(new Path("Output2")); Try to search on net for more examples. there are plenty of them. Best Kumar On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:22 AM, gaurav bagga wrote: > It would be great if you could tell or point me to an article which uses > the > output of first map reduce as input for the 2nd map reduce. > > -Gaurav > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Kumar Harshit >wrote: > > > You can create 2nd map reduce job. The input to the mapper of 2nd Map > > Reduce > > job is the output of 1st Map Reduce job. This way you can tackle the > issue. > > > > Hope it helps > > > > Kumar > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ankit Gandhi > > wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not > > > because > > > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. > > > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in > psuedo-distributed > > > mode. > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > -- > > > Ankit Gandhi > > > Undergraduate > > > Center for Visual Information Technology > > > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree > > > IIIT-Hyderabad > > > > > > --001485f6ce1efd8a8c049395ac3a-- From general-return-2276-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 09:52:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6927 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 09:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 09:52:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 49851 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 09:52:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49515 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 09:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49507 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 09:52:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:52:09 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so454167fxm.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:51:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=BUxTjQ4gpMZYOp4MDDxZY/GHW7Cv+tKgT7BHL6ph2k8=; b=onQGQsWSOBGQa//EOvw0Ef5ED1rwrHg1/0q2yZpRwAebEXYgr5/i25aeOywmQniujM AIvHzxatiyjvjQMuoPvxxs7RI0mAhpuwLPztYwzW/WDj7b8pdUEHpq0q/rz0dUPmBHEx RAWcDkDpgEO3N0vFF7fZBsMpNG3954+4QY25E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Lyo05XS6RvBCPxSZWoE+GQ83sMjuxOTyI3YY0UzXnDY6Yp8nrF5wMM9lPcHj1F0Ifk NPCObxoTO9EkT9ZzwuQiYsyx/apmoMkynZf6Fngj+KSyK0L00VKbgVmZryQrC9k0FbbX K6LjSL0BZ8DrPFSdSn8pGxVpSm4q+Pt3chaDo= Received: by 10.223.101.194 with SMTP id d2mr2066095fao.88.1288173108557; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:51:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.80 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:51:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:21:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, gaurav bagga wrote: > It would be great if you could tell or point me to an article which uses the > output of first map reduce as input for the 2nd map reduce. There's ChainMapper and ChainReducer that let you do [MAP+ / REDUCE MAP*] kind of job configuration (single job). If you wish to chain jobs (To look like MRMRMR-ish), look at o.a.h.mapred.jobcontrol.Job at: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/jobcontrol/Job.html Specifically, look at Job.addDependingJob. > > -Gaurav > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Kumar Harshit wrote: > >> You can create 2nd map reduce job. The input to the mapper of 2nd Map >> Reduce >> job is the output of 1st Map Reduce job. This way you can tackle the issue. >> >> Hope it helps >> >> Kumar >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Ankit Gandhi >> wrote: >> >> > Hey, >> > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not >> > because >> > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. >> > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distributed >> > mode. >> > Thanks in advance >> > >> > -- >> > Ankit Gandhi >> > Undergraduate >> > Center for Visual Information Technology >> > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree >> > IIIT-Hyderabad >> > >> > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2277-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 13:33:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31874 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 13:33:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 13:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 45733 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 13:33:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45457 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 13:33:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45448 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 13:33:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:33:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:33:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 31783 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 13:33:31 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:33:30 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so590645bwz.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:33:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.100.17 with SMTP id w17mr7182151bkn.43.1288186408743; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.29.18 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:33:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: ApacheCon US Next Week From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646bc984c32490493994521 --00163646bc984c32490493994521 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All, Next week is ApacheCon US in Atlanta. We have a whole day of talks about Hadoop lined up. Come meet and learn from the people who make Hadoop. The entire program is here http://bit.ly/aOHIg6, but the Hadoop talks are: Hadoop Security: Keeping out the Looky Loos by Owen O'Malley How to make your map-reduce jobs perform as well as Pig by Thejas M Nair Hive Design by John Sichi Fighting Spam with Hadoop by Florian Leibert Getting Apache Hadoop Production Ready by Chris Douglas Top 10 Lessons Learned from Deploying Hadoop in a Private Cloud by Rod Cope There is also a NoSQL track: Introduction to Cassandra by Jonathan Ellis How We Made CouchDB Scale by Brad Anderson HBase Today by Jonathan Gray Cache & Concurrency considerations for a high performance Cassandra deployment by SriSatish Ambati Lucandra: Lucene + Cassandra by Jake Luciani Cassandra + Hadoop: So Happy Together by Jeremy Hanna Additionally, there is a Hadoop Meetup the previous night (11/2) that is open to all. http://bit.ly/bzx48N -- Owen --00163646bc984c32490493994521-- From general-return-2278-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 14:20:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50303 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 14:20:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 14:20:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 70314 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 14:20:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70044 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 14:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70036 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 14:20:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:20:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.22] (HELO col0-omc1-s12.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:20:42 +0000 Received: from COL117-W22 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s12.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:20:21 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_90806d1d-63e3-4b0e-bf3f-31f141b87526_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Running jar files inside map task Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:20:21 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2010 14:20:21.0350 (UTC) FILETIME=[16AA2860:01CB75E2] --_90806d1d-63e3-4b0e-bf3f-31f141b87526_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Uhm... just to take this in a different direction ... Yes=2C you can run a jar file within your hadoop m/r job.=20 You may end up with class loader problems though=2C depending on what's in = the jar. I think what I'm talking about goes beyond the concept of chaining jobs=2C = so I'm just tossing it out there as a response to your question ... HTH -Mike > From: qwertymaniac@gmail.com > Date: Wed=2C 27 Oct 2010 15:21:28 +0530 > Subject: Re: Running jar files inside map task > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > On Wed=2C Oct 27=2C 2010 at 12:52 PM=2C gaurav bagga wrote: > > It would be great if you could tell or point me to an article which use= s the > > output of first map reduce as input for the 2nd map reduce. >=20 > There's ChainMapper and ChainReducer that let you do [MAP+ / REDUCE > MAP*] kind of job configuration (single job). >=20 > If you wish to chain jobs (To look like MRMRMR-ish)=2C look at > o.a.h.mapred.jobcontrol.Job at: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred= /jobcontrol/Job.html >=20 > Specifically=2C look at Job.addDependingJob. >=20 > > > > -Gaurav > > > > > > > > On Tue=2C Oct 26=2C 2010 at 7:02 PM=2C Kumar Harshit wrote: > > > >> You can create 2nd map reduce job. The input to the mapper of 2nd Map > >> Reduce > >> job is the output of 1st Map Reduce job. This way you can tackle the i= ssue. > >> > >> Hope it helps > >> > >> Kumar > >> > >> On Mon=2C Oct 25=2C 2010 at 1:42 PM=2C Ankit Gandhi > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hey=2C > >> > I want to know whether can I run a jar file inside a map task or not > >> > because > >> > I have to use the output of that file in my map task. > >> > I am able to run it in standalone mode but it fails in psuedo-distri= buted > >> > mode. > >> > Thanks in advance > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Ankit Gandhi > >> > Undergraduate > >> > Center for Visual Information Technology > >> > Computer Science Engineering & Dual Degree > >> > IIIT-Hyderabad > >> > > >> > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Harsh J > www.harshj.com = --_90806d1d-63e3-4b0e-bf3f-31f141b87526_-- From general-return-2279-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 16:41:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2761 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 16:41:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 16:41:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 80009 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:36:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76700 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67254 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 16:30:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:30:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:30:18 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so847075fxm.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NWHHaRzj5JF6zq8fsrwxuLGWkT54DeEDbS26terTcTU=; b=LEbMGQqpvmTxG6qzABalkABxwbqBgMF1Wcjk5Z/bRcHd1DebNPbjb0KJ13g0PevgDQ WqFdiGVgLm05t1Km5aDmMg2dh5KawEhcOQnX3F70gOiqr4yJrVkrcpZDxJ4Zbs7TmS+/ 3hDSdhF7b5pEEOv0J8eYoj9IgbxTBcm7FPvrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QYnywzf9eiETOLis0izxeV0/zXEXb/rwDpEz/kyzyKS2sICt1NTc85bmqpf/vBsyva yIPf8rLgliDlf48TKrWy/9IADypnEqN5buc+YwYHreKTMTF9hojic4iygO761I3OChaX NiuK8SNmNfDfdDhF/I3hc7bTp/eqLPlxCVCN4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.95.208 with SMTP id e16mr2609451fan.59.1288196967837; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.96.193 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8EFD2@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> <4917217774F061468FB94129CD619EB602E8F26B@EXVBE012-15.exch012.intermedia.net> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:29:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a4a5ab323f04939bbae6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054a4a5ab323f04939bbae6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This link has more information: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201007.mbox/%3CAANLkTimScTowrYvQNcC5-ccxwVlwRyWnOdQ4asBWjNUW@mail.gmail.com%3E I personally store hadoop/hbase discussions in gmail so that I can find them easily. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Harsh J wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Aniruddha wrote: > > Please give me some links. I m new to hadoop as well as also new how > > this email discussion goes > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > Sent: 26 October 2010 09:46 > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: XmlInputFormat > > > > Refer to previous discussion entitled 'Hadoop and XML' > > Here's the thread archive at OS Dir: > http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2010-07/msg00102.html > > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Aniruddha > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> I am having trouble with using xml text as input, I had tried with > >> "org.apache.mahout.classifier.bayes. XmlInputFormat", but no luck. I > > am > >> not getting any input in mapper. Did anybody have success to use > >> XmlInputFormat. Please reply me. I am really stuck with this issue > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks & Regards, > >> > >> Aniruddha > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --20cf3054a4a5ab323f04939bbae6-- From general-return-2280-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:08:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69350 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:08:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:08:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 31085 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29778 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29475 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:05:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:05:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:05:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 55662 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:04:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:04:57 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so869324bwz.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.69.65 with SMTP id y1mr2163337bki.23.1288202695621; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.114.3 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:04:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Patrick Hunt To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a top-level Apache project. The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who has not been active on the project since it's inception http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? Regards, Patrick ------------ X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to distributed system coordination for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed system coordination; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache ZooKeeper Project: * Patrick Hunt * Flavio Junqueira * Mahadev Konar * Benjamin Reed * Henry Robinson NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-2281-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:11:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72951 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:11:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 81180 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81114 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81106 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:11:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:11:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 72911 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:00 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:11:00 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so875348bwz.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:10:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.103.133 with SMTP id k5mr7737140bko.68.1288203057897; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.29.18 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:10:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e4e9aa205804939d250b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7e4e9aa205804939d250b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. +1 --0016e6d7e4e9aa205804939d250b-- From general-return-2282-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:11:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73075 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:11:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 82485 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82435 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82427 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:11:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:11:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:11:30 +0000 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so703278gxk.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.24.199 with SMTP id x49mr9381657wex.109.1288203068223; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.201 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:11:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:11:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > ------------ > > =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinati= on > =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project= ", > =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r" be > =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsi= bility > =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fur= ther > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r, to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby= is > =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apach= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2283-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:12:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73375 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:12:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 85167 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:12:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85066 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85058 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:12:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:12:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:12:33 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so552881ewy.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:12:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qMqMwenQ5hfbgzBFBBz1qwTIiuxEy9BSJX0gHYwyzh4=; b=mLrmH4uYe72xbvRbipec82EreClo7tfjK7PFo1vE1CYYoK3dllCXuhiVat1r9dVFWR RbqPEB+z9GaQkgBcHhpp84Sf3s/vbqLPdETdxFmt3m7gmtCQpMdHN7SMJqpFL2yRo+Gv Jqj9yaWcsvM0ZZMJMgLaZvI0EPkmsf7Vdmu6o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EJICOdeg/DLB6+rSgZvpcdM8ZZzoJ62670GzIQYycf4vBV8/BB4qPN48sAt5ZQe5Jm bg401k+ofgT/Mgux3jDSY9X0oRq/btN5a8aLVdywzEvGBnVlaK2w1wsxmQlvinkwVROx uj6vZRooDDTVDxL9pbvM29KOZvGvsKXFWEF9U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.65 with SMTP id g1mr3579840ebg.65.1288203131722; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.125.201 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:12:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:12:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a >> top-level Apache project. >> >> The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved >> ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It >> lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who >> has not been active on the project since it's inception >> http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. >> >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >> >> ------------ >> >> =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinat= ion >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Projec= t", >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it furthe= r >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er" be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chai= r >> =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary respons= ibility >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fu= rther >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er, to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereb= y is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in th= e >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby >> =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apac= he >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > From general-return-2284-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:14:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74681 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:14:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:14:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 87409 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:14:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87349 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87341 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:14:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:14:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:13:55 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9RID5Qj083702 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:13:04 -0700 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:13:02 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Index: Act2AnmjRoMOcRSaQ+2r4vBevFF4vQAAB47y Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1. Thanks mahadev On 10/27/10 11:11 AM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: > +1 >=20 > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a >> top-level Apache project. >>=20 >> The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved >> ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It >> lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who >> has not been active on the project since it's inception >> http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. >>=20 >>=20 >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >>=20 >> Regards, >>=20 >> Patrick >>=20 >> ------------ >>=20 >> =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinat= ion >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Projec= t", >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it furthe= r >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er" be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chai= r >> =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary respons= ibility >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fu= rther >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er, to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereb= y is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in th= e >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby >> =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apac= he >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com >=20 From general-return-2285-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:23:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83573 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:23:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4278 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:23:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4232 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:23:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4223 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:23:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:23:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:23:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 83553 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:23:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:23:25 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so1199394iwn.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.73 with SMTP id w9mr1605361ibd.42.1288203804525; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.215.234 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. +1 -C From general-return-2286-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:24:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83714 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:24:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:24:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 5647 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5599 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5591 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:24:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 65.55.88.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:24 +0000 Received: from mail105-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.254) by TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.9.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:03 +0000 Received: from mail105-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail105-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40852DC81C2 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -22 X-BigFish: VS-22(zzbb2dK1432N98dN9371Pzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2ei87h2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail Received: from mail105-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail105-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1288203842926027_11834; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.249]) by mail105-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE78C80057 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB040.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (10.9.99.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.44; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:24:02 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.16]) by VA3DIAHUB040.RED001.local ([10.32.21.114]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:24:00 -0700 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Index: Act2BCCZQhwqXiwuRGaIA7UbuyvF5g== Message-ID: <07A09366-426C-426F-883C-1C93F0EAEC0E@Announcemedia.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Reverse-DNS: smtp801.microsoftonline.com KzENCg0KDQoNCk9uIE9jdCAyNywgMjAxMCwgYXQgMTE6MjIgQU0sICJNYWhhZGV2IEtvbmFyIiA8 bWFoYWRldkB5YWhvby1pbmMuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPiANCj4gKzEuDQo+IA0KPiBUaGFua3MN Cj4gbWFoYWRldg0KPiANCj4gT24gMTAvMjcvMTAgMTE6MTEgQU0sICJFcmljIFNhbW1lciIgPGVz YW1tZXJAY2xvdWRlcmEuY29tPiB3cm90ZToNCj4gDQo+PiArMQ0KPj4gDQo+PiBPbiBXZWQsIE9j dCAyNywgMjAxMCBhdCAyOjA0IFBNLCBQYXRyaWNrIEh1bnQgPHBodW50QGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+IHdy b3RlOg0KPj4+IFBsZWFzZSB2b3RlIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXIgeW91IHRoaW5rIFpvb0tlZXBlciBz aG91bGQgYmVjb21lIGENCj4+PiB0b3AtbGV2ZWwgQXBhY2hlIHByb2plY3QuDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4g VGhlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBjb21tdW5pdHkgaGFzIGFscmVhZHkgdm90ZWQgb24g YW5kIGFwcHJvdmVkDQo+Pj4gKCBodHRwOi8vYml0Lmx5LzlWQ29UaSApIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcg ZHJhZnQgYm9hcmQgcmVzb2x1dGlvbi4gSXQNCj4+PiBsaXN0cyBhbGwgY3VycmVudCBhY3RpdmUg Wm9vS2VlcGVyIGNvbW1pdHRlcnMgKHNhbnMgb25lIGNvbW1pdHRlciB3aG8NCj4+PiBoYXMgbm90 IGJlZW4gYWN0aXZlIG9uIHRoZSBwcm9qZWN0IHNpbmNlIGl0J3MgaW5jZXB0aW9uDQo+Pj4gaHR0 cDovL2JpdC5seS85d0xrVlYpIGFzIGluaXRpYWwgbWVtYmVycyBvZiB0aGUgcHJvamVjdCBtYW5h Z2VtZW50DQo+Pj4gY29tbWl0dGVlIChQTUMpIGFuZCBteXNlbGYsIFBhdHJpY2sgSHVudCwgYXMg dGhlIGluaXRpYWwgY2hhaXIuDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gRG8gdGhlIGdvb2QgcGVvcGxlIG9m IEhhZG9vcCBzdXBwb3J0IHNlbmRpbmcgdGhpcyByZXF1ZXN0IG9uIHRvIHRoZQ0KPj4+IEhhZG9v cCBQTUM/DQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gUmVnYXJkcywNCj4+PiANCj4+PiBQYXRyaWNrDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4g LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gICAgWC4gRXN0YWJsaXNoIHRoZSBBcGFjaGUgWm9vS2Vl cGVyIFByb2plY3QNCj4+PiANCj4+PiAgICAgICBXSEVSRUFTLCB0aGUgQm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0 b3JzIGRlZW1zIGl0IHRvIGJlIGluIHRoZSBiZXN0DQo+Pj4gICAgICAgaW50ZXJlc3RzIG9mIHRo ZSBGb3VuZGF0aW9uIGFuZCBjb25zaXN0ZW50IHdpdGggdGhlDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgRm91bmRhdGlv bidzIHB1cnBvc2UgdG8gZXN0YWJsaXNoIGEgUHJvamVjdCBNYW5hZ2VtZW50DQo+Pj4gICAgICAg Q29tbWl0dGVlIGNoYXJnZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3JlYXRpb24gYW5kIG1haW50ZW5hbmNlIG9mDQo+ Pj4gICAgICAgb3Blbi1zb3VyY2Ugc29mdHdhcmUgcmVsYXRlZCB0byBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCBzeXN0 ZW0gY29vcmRpbmF0aW9uDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgZm9yIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBhdCBubyBjaGFyZ2Ug dG8gdGhlIHB1YmxpYy4NCj4+PiANCj4+PiAgICAgICBOT1csIFRIRVJFRk9SRSwgQkUgSVQgUkVT T0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgYSBQcm9qZWN0IE1hbmFnZW1lbnQNCj4+PiAgICAgICBDb21taXR0ZWUgKFBN QyksIHRvIGJlIGtub3duIGFzIHRoZSAiQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0IiwNCj4+PiAg ICAgICBiZSBhbmQgaGVyZWJ5IGlzIGVzdGFibGlzaGVkIHB1cnN1YW50IHRvIEJ5bGF3cyBvZiB0 aGUNCj4+PiAgICAgICBGb3VuZGF0aW9uOyBhbmQgYmUgaXQgZnVydGhlcg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ICAg ICAgIFJFU09MVkVELCB0aGF0IHRoZSBBcGFjaGUgWm9vS2VlcGVyIFByb2plY3QgYmUgYW5kIGhl cmVieSBpcw0KPj4+ICAgICAgIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGZvciB0aGUgY3JlYXRpb24gYW5kIG1haW50 ZW5hbmNlIG9mIHNvZnR3YXJlDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgcmVsYXRlZCB0byBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCBzeXN0 ZW0gY29vcmRpbmF0aW9uOyBhbmQgYmUgaXQgZnVydGhlcg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ICAgICAgIFJFU09M VkVELCB0aGF0IHRoZSBvZmZpY2Ugb2YgIlZpY2UgUHJlc2lkZW50LCBBcGFjaGUgWm9vS2VlcGVy IiBiZQ0KPj4+ICAgICAgIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkgaXMgY3JlYXRlZCwgdGhlIHBlcnNvbiBob2xkaW5n IHN1Y2ggb2ZmaWNlIHRvDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgc2VydmUgYXQgdGhlIGRpcmVjdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUg Qm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0b3JzIGFzIHRoZSBjaGFpcg0KPj4+ICAgICAgIG9mIHRoZSBBcGFjaGUg Wm9vS2VlcGVyIFByb2plY3QsIGFuZCB0byBoYXZlIHByaW1hcnkgcmVzcG9uc2liaWxpdHkNCj4+ PiAgICAgICBmb3IgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBvZiB0aGUgcHJvamVjdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBzY29wZSBv Zg0KPj4+ICAgICAgIHJlc3BvbnNpYmlsaXR5IG9mIHRoZSBBcGFjaGUgWm9vS2VlcGVyIFByb2pl Y3Q7IGFuZCBiZSBpdCBmdXJ0aGVyDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgUkVTT0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgdGhl IHBlcnNvbnMgbGlzdGVkIGltbWVkaWF0ZWx5IGJlbG93IGJlIGFuZA0KPj4+ICAgICAgIGhlcmVi eSBhcmUgYXBwb2ludGVkIHRvIHNlcnZlIGFzIHRoZSBpbml0aWFsIG1lbWJlcnMgb2YgdGhlDQo+ Pj4gICAgICAgQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0Og0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ICAgICAgICAgKiBQ YXRyaWNrIEh1bnQgICAgICAgICA8cGh1bnRAYXBhY2hlLm9yZz4NCj4+PiAgICAgICAgICogRmxh dmlvIEp1bnF1ZWlyYSAgICAgPGZwakBhcGFjaGUub3JnPg0KPj4+ICAgICAgICAgKiBNYWhhZGV2 IEtvbmFyICAgICAgICA8bWFoYWRldkBhcGFjaGUub3JnPg0KPj4+ICAgICAgICAgKiBCZW5qYW1p biBSZWVkICAgICAgICA8YnJlZWRAYXBhY2hlLm9yZz4NCj4+PiAgICAgICAgICogSGVucnkgUm9i aW5zb24gICAgICAgPGhlbnJ5QGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+DQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgTk9XLCBUSEVS RUZPUkUsIEJFIElUIEZVUlRIRVIgUkVTT0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgUGF0cmljayBIdW50DQo+Pj4gICAg ICAgYmUgYXBwb2ludGVkIHRvIHRoZSBvZmZpY2Ugb2YgVmljZSBQcmVzaWRlbnQsIEFwYWNoZSBa b29LZWVwZXIsIHRvDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgc2VydmUgaW4gYWNjb3JkYW5jZSB3aXRoIGFuZCBzdWJq ZWN0IHRvIHRoZSBkaXJlY3Rpb24gb2YgdGhlDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgQm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0b3Jz IGFuZCB0aGUgQnlsYXdzIG9mIHRoZSBGb3VuZGF0aW9uIHVudGlsDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgZGVhdGgs IHJlc2lnbmF0aW9uLCByZXRpcmVtZW50LCByZW1vdmFsIG9yIGRpc3F1YWxpZmljYXRpb24sDQo+ Pj4gICAgICAgb3IgdW50aWwgYSBzdWNjZXNzb3IgaXMgYXBwb2ludGVkOyBhbmQgYmUgaXQgZnVy dGhlcg0KPj4+IA0KPj4+ICAgICAgIFJFU09MVkVELCB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbml0aWFsIEFwYWNoZSBa b29LZWVwZXIgUE1DIGJlIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkgaXMNCj4+PiAgICAgICB0YXNrZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUg Y3JlYXRpb24gb2YgYSBzZXQgb2YgYnlsYXdzIGludGVuZGVkIHRvDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgZW5jb3Vy YWdlIG9wZW4gZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgYW5kIGluY3JlYXNlZCBwYXJ0aWNpcGF0aW9uIGluIHRoZQ0K Pj4+ICAgICAgIEFwYWNoZSBab29LZWVwZXIgUHJvamVjdDsgYW5kIGJlIGl0IGZ1cnRoZXINCj4+ PiANCj4+PiAgICAgICBSRVNPTFZFRCwgdGhhdCB0aGUgQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0 IGJlIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkNCj4+PiAgICAgICBpcyB0YXNrZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uIGFu ZCByYXRpb25hbGl6YXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIEFwYWNoZQ0KPj4+ICAgICAgIEhhZG9vcCBab29LZWVw ZXIgc3ViLXByb2plY3Q7IGFuZCBiZSBpdCBmdXJ0aGVyDQo+Pj4gDQo+Pj4gICAgICAgUkVTT0xW RUQsIHRoYXQgYWxsIHJlc3BvbnNpYmlsaXRpZXMgcGVydGFpbmluZyB0byB0aGUgQXBhY2hlDQo+ Pj4gICAgICAgSGFkb29wIFpvb0tlZXBlciBzdWItcHJvamVjdCBlbmN1bWJlcmVkIHVwb24gdGhl DQo+Pj4gICAgICAgQXBhY2hlIEhhZG9vcCBQcm9qZWN0IGFyZSBoZXJlYWZ0ZXIgZGlzY2hhcmdl ZC4NCj4+PiANCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+IC0tDQo+PiBFcmljIFNhbW1lcg0KPj4gdHdpdHRl cjogZXNhbW1lcg0KPj4gZGF0YTogd3d3LmNsb3VkZXJhLmNvbQ0KPj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCg== From general-return-2287-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:26:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84445 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:26:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8350 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:26:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8141 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:26:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8133 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:26:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:26:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:26:10 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.202] (wlanvpn-snve-246-202.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.202]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9RIPZ7O088156 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:25:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1288203935; bh=yubnqvOxH5wghrCpYkYGbKsY6Wx8HEC3NSs/FNvj738=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rt/Z6BiVLwEmPm3d/w9/DxBZD2DGSmKd0Sl6UHOsnVZK4GmlgCM99U/o2gaQ6+V5k tIKpC5J1kUhshL+zlHlMp0QjyQQNk/MQgD1H//39Oo22NvE370yGayMV64kV7DJ47c lCR6Jbaaquno/OfqcDZ8q7eX1AMVO3NJIlDSjqec= Message-ID: <4CC86E9F.6000109@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:25:35 -0700 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 From general-return-2288-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:40:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88870 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 24649 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:40:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24577 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24569 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:40:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:40:10 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-226.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-snve-246-226.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.226]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id o9RId3fR082424 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1288204751; bh=oFGAovNE2J2J+ZDdrvRvyHLNbTi2pxx+a7zgsdBv8eg=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=EU1BULsjfoCLfy3+HKnf2It7tyEgrU1/KqI/Ocgl1OJ7wiFJuRWUib0OR77UMe/j7 g9J5zbDsj37VD7PvwBRYLOMd3u6Bry5zEd8XiWmAEUMFfTAOjPdMH9OvT4LtJXlLwa cReOtpeBUPWGJDOkn9qMb2L1YO5vAmR6c1u3jEGs= Message-Id: <43E3CD46-4A71-4632-AA2F-DDF43CB5C34E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:39:03 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 27, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > +1 Arun From general-return-2289-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:46:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91164 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:46:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:46:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 36181 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36132 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36124 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:46:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:46:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcosluis2186@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:46:26 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so981090wwi.29 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:46:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=P7T7DwqdzrCAD2xrMVsACBn5A9SQCqcDBr3aoADs5sg=; b=wHZ61kmyevTQl7DEGtQ1RA/BB987kGeKSxriE11w3tjaBT6F/FVXIkvMvtLx90UBn+ w1ypYXhf4tSiQlKsutnxzr0SWdFPM1rvAfTWUBA14EoW5+l/nA5g/k3PYX7Y1k7eHO7E DrguNL0UIQFwOhubgo/tlIGLeX4wjMkDqKv+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vQ6jU3kJow925zTC/okEeQqS6JcNSgV6/rXhjmckPqRxzqs33G7DXdL+Koh9fMaFZ8 5WxNh2PkVPu4/1E6HbCbBXYjGJNLcx1TQMQQ2e/AnL+ZI8MkLDRHHZBwR+fcj5mW8Ay4 M2r6ex4trvRzA8iHiND5b00rl4q0bfbf1lHVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.141.201 with SMTP id n9mr2449691wbu.185.1288205165026; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.138 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831db24260d904939da3e0 --001636831db24260d904939da3e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 --=20 Ing. Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda Data Lover(RDBMS and NOSQL Movement) && System Engineer Linux User # 418229 http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/sql-apprentice http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186/ http://github.com/marcosluis2186 --001636831db24260d904939da3e0-- From general-return-2290-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:51:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92138 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:51:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 44411 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44351 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44343 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:51:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:51:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:51:46 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1104704wyg.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.148 with SMTP id b20mr2351312wbx.14.1288205484347; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.43.11 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:51:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Henry Robinson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163683397a4ad32404939db6f4 --00163683397a4ad32404939db6f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On 27 October 2010 11:46, Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda < marcosluis2186@googlemail.com> wrote: > +1 > -- > Ing. Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Data Lover(RDBMS and NOSQL Movement) && System Engineer > Linux User # 418229 > > http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/sql-apprentice > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186/ > http://github.com/marcosluis2186 > --=20 Henry Robinson Software Engineer Cloudera 415-994-6679 --00163683397a4ad32404939db6f4-- From general-return-2291-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 18:57:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93081 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 18:57:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 18:57:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 52177 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52071 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 18:56:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52063 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 18:56:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:56:41 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LAY00MH7PXJG470@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:56:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-27_09:2010-10-27,2010-10-27,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010270097 Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:56:07 -0700 Message-id: <8168FC59-75CC-4FD4-A27A-2F0F49964F3D@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On Oct 27, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. +1 From general-return-2292-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 20:43:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33906 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 20:43:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 20:43:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 79795 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 20:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79719 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 20:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79710 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 20:43:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:43:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:43:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 33731 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 20:43:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.130]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:43:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4CC88EF1.4070209@apache.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:43:29 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 10/27/2010 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. From general-return-2293-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 21:28:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51881 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 21:28:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 21:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 62268 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62224 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62216 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 21:28:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:28:19 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so1382889iwn.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.220.134 with SMTP id hy6mr1822563icb.61.1288214877196; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (173-164-176-117-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.164.176.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c40sm116791vcs.1.2010.10.27.14.27.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:27:51 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Message-ID: <20101027212751.GA4207@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. >=20 > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. >=20 >=20 > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Patrick >=20 > ------------ >=20 > X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project >=20 > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to distributed system coordination > for distribution at no charge to the public. >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to distributed system coordination; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache ZooKeeper Project: >=20 > * Patrick Hunt > * Flavio Junqueira > * Mahadev Konar > * Benjamin Reed > * Henry Robinson >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzImVcACgkQIg9pgB8n5iK69gCeJFZCypkfJhorksW8y/mWonW2 Bf0AoJhh9Z9v3UWznF5+Hj9GStQ88pn3 =SPL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From general-return-2294-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 22:16:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70510 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 22:16:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 22:16:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 40733 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40674 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40666 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 22:16:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:16:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:16:41 +0000 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so935296gyg.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.112.20 with SMTP id k20mr8394097anc.60.1288217780056; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.126.6.178] (mobile-166-137-138-052.mycingular.net [166.137.138.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b25sm260912anb.3.2010.10.27.15.16.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? References: From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <95F1E74D-FE95-446A-99C9-BDB7D7A76466@holsman.net> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:15:13 -0400 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) +1 --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 On 27/10/2010, at 2:46 PM, Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda wrote: > +1 > --=20 > Ing. Marcos Lu=C3=ADs Ort=C3=ADz Valmaseda > Data Lover(RDBMS and NOSQL Movement) && System Engineer > Linux User # 418229 >=20 > http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/sql-apprentice > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186/ > http://github.com/marcosluis2186 From general-return-2295-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 22:42:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83145 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 22:42:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 22:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 77394 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:42:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77347 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:42:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77338 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 22:42:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:42:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:42:49 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o9RMFdW0009537 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:15:39 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id EF2BD3A1F6DA for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id F3I0HfEZSkb9c0Pq for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o9RMgRtf000843 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:27 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:27 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:42:20 -0500 Subject: RE: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Thread-Index: Act2JKYX2UTsZdMaRWeeJxJliLcyQwAA5CsW Message-ID: References: ,<95F1E74D-FE95-446A-99C9-BDB7D7A76466@holsman.net> In-Reply-To: <95F1E74D-FE95-446A-99C9-BDB7D7A76466@holsman.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org KzENCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkZyb206IElhbiBI b2xzbWFuIFtoYWRvb3BAaG9sc21hbi5uZXRdDQpTZW50OiBXZWRuZXNkYXksIE9jdG9iZXIgMjcs IDIwMTAgNToxNSBQTQ0KVG86IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJl OiBbVk9URV0gWm9vS2VlcGVyIGFzIFRMUD8NCg0KKzENCg0KLS0tDQpJYW4gSG9sc21hbiAtIDcw MyA4NzktMzEyOA0KDQoNCg0KT24gMjcvMTAvMjAxMCwgYXQgMjo0NiBQTSwgTWFyY29zIEx1aXMg T3J0aXogVmFsbWFzZWRhIDxtYXJjb3NsdWlzMjE4NkBnb29nbGVtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoN Cj4gKzENCj4gLS0NCj4gSW5nLiBNYXJjb3MgTHXtcyBPcnTteiBWYWxtYXNlZGENCj4gRGF0YSBM b3ZlcihSREJNUyBhbmQgTk9TUUwgTW92ZW1lbnQpICYmIFN5c3RlbSBFbmdpbmVlcg0KPiBMaW51 eCBVc2VyICMgNDE4MjI5DQo+DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly9pdC50b29sYm94LmNvbS9ibG9ncy9zcWwtYXBw cmVudGljZQ0KPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmxpbmtlZGluLmNvbS9pbi9tYXJjb3NsdWlzMjE4Ni8NCj4g aHR0cDovL2dpdGh1Yi5jb20vbWFyY29zbHVpczIxODYNCg0KDQpUaGUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY29u dGFpbmVkIGluIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBtYXkgYmUgQ09ORklERU5USUFMIGFuZCBpcyBp bnRlbmRlZCBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWNpcGllbnQocykgbmFtZWQgYWJvdmUu ICBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LCB5b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBu b3RpZmllZCB0aGF0IGFueSBkaXNzZW1pbmF0aW9uLCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24sIG9yIGNvcHlpbmcg b2YgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uLCBvciBhbnkgb2YgaXRzIGNvbnRlbnRzLCBpcyBzdHJpY3Rs eSBwcm9oaWJpdGVkLiAgSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGlu IGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZS9kZXN0cm95IHRoZSBv cmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBhbnkgY29weSBvZiBpdCBmcm9tIHlvdXIgY29tcHV0ZXIgb3Ig cGFwZXIgZmlsZXMuDQo= From general-return-2296-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 22:55:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86110 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 22:55:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 22:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 90815 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90761 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 22:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90753 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 22:55:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:55:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:55:34 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1336450wyg.35 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:55:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FeNd0juL1ZtN2MxWiJ8Gx+XE66iWUsVzx2WApLiyXv8=; b=V67yHb3DUvdRGxe9EJnJyW1y8vPJRGMXg4OsNVaw+komety3f+h4z75ym0xJCeyg+U gQM0rStzcWZVnGADUe+LUgNEg2MKTRoeJqP0mLQh40gLtmvtuzCowjrIi9XzdpFbrqsR wzsQBcz35QLIRzw0ztfhpZZzXF8i+pXgDnoXA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=k4vlachP2H/vC3bX1Cs+wqVAcsipRqrGkNQmMVC/yWyh9pOSv+QNg6rhvp5FKo51l2 r+j3Gtn6zk7Drl8sb+U+AQlpKeanpS5m9MkbsOkYK523UcJjJSI7X6DwmOvYJPMZbfdc 2L+b90ApGl4CFUmXAHk86HEs/SIdHlF00dT9c= Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr1494682wep.96.1288220114566; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:55:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.59.6 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:54:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:54:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > ------------ > > =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinati= on > =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project= ", > =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r" be > =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsi= bility > =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fur= ther > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r, to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby= is > =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apach= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2297-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 23:23:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95545 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 23:23:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 23:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 12454 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 23:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12294 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 23:23:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12286 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 23:23:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:23:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of SRS0=7Aw9rP=R5=2b2collaboration.com=maricela@srs.bis.na.blackberry.com designates 216.9.248.63 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.9.248.63] (HELO smtp21.bis.na.blackberry.com) (216.9.248.63) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:23:44 +0000 Received: from bda834.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (bda834.bisx.prod.on.blackberry [172.20.219.144]) by srs.bis.na.blackberry.com (8.13.7 TEAMON/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o9RNNKNd004690; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:23:20 GMT Received: from bda834.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bda834.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (8.13.7 TEAMON/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o9RNNKMw030888; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:23:20 GMT X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 1897115290 Message-ID: <1897115290-1288221800-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-404364731-@bda358.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Reply-To: maricela@2b2collaboration.com X-Priority: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: "Maricela Morales" Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:25:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" MIME-Version: 1.0 KzENCk1lbnNhamUgZW52aWFkbyBkZXNkZSBtaSBCbGFja0JlcnJ5rg0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFs IE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogVG9tIFdoaXRlIDx0b20uZS53aGl0ZUBnbWFpbC5jb20+DQpE YXRlOiBXZWQsIDI3IE9jdCAyMDEwIDE1OjU0OjU0IA0KVG86IDxnZW5lcmFsQGhhZG9vcC5hcGFj aGUub3JnPg0KUmVwbHktVG86IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJl OiBbVk9URV0gWm9vS2VlcGVyIGFzIFRMUD8NCg0KKzENCg0KVG9tDQoNCk9uIFdlZCwgT2N0IDI3 LCAyMDEwIGF0IDExOjA0IEFNLCBQYXRyaWNrIEh1bnQgPHBodW50QGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+IHdyb3Rl Og0KPiBQbGVhc2Ugdm90ZSBhcyB0byB3aGV0aGVyIHlvdSB0aGluayBab29LZWVwZXIgc2hvdWxk IGJlY29tZSBhDQo+IHRvcC1sZXZlbCBBcGFjaGUgcHJvamVjdC4NCj4NCj4gVGhlIFpvb0tlZXBl ciBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBjb21tdW5pdHkgaGFzIGFscmVhZHkgdm90ZWQgb24gYW5kIGFwcHJvdmVk DQo+ICggaHR0cDovL2JpdC5seS85VkNvVGkgKSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGRyYWZ0IGJvYXJkIHJl c29sdXRpb24uIEl0DQo+IGxpc3RzIGFsbCBjdXJyZW50IGFjdGl2ZSBab29LZWVwZXIgY29tbWl0 dGVycyAoc2FucyBvbmUgY29tbWl0dGVyIHdobw0KPiBoYXMgbm90IGJlZW4gYWN0aXZlIG9uIHRo ZSBwcm9qZWN0IHNpbmNlIGl0J3MgaW5jZXB0aW9uDQo+IGh0dHA6Ly9iaXQubHkvOXdMa1ZWKSBh cyBpbml0aWFsIG1lbWJlcnMgb2YgdGhlIHByb2plY3QgbWFuYWdlbWVudA0KPiBjb21taXR0ZWUg KFBNQykgYW5kIG15c2VsZiwgUGF0cmljayBIdW50LCBhcyB0aGUgaW5pdGlhbCBjaGFpci4NCj4N Cj4NCj4gRG8gdGhlIGdvb2QgcGVvcGxlIG9mIEhhZG9vcCBzdXBwb3J0IHNlbmRpbmcgdGhpcyBy ZXF1ZXN0IG9uIHRvIHRoZQ0KPiBIYWRvb3AgUE1DPw0KPg0KPiBSZWdhcmRzLA0KPg0KPiBQYXRy aWNrDQo+DQo+IC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KPg0KPiCgIKBYLiBFc3RhYmxpc2ggdGhlIEFwYWNoZSBa b29LZWVwZXIgUHJvamVjdA0KPg0KPiCgIKAgoCBXSEVSRUFTLCB0aGUgQm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0 b3JzIGRlZW1zIGl0IHRvIGJlIGluIHRoZSBiZXN0DQo+IKAgoCCgIGludGVyZXN0cyBvZiB0aGUg Rm91bmRhdGlvbiBhbmQgY29uc2lzdGVudCB3aXRoIHRoZQ0KPiCgIKAgoCBGb3VuZGF0aW9uJ3Mg cHVycG9zZSB0byBlc3RhYmxpc2ggYSBQcm9qZWN0IE1hbmFnZW1lbnQNCj4goCCgIKAgQ29tbWl0 dGVlIGNoYXJnZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3JlYXRpb24gYW5kIG1haW50ZW5hbmNlIG9mDQo+IKAgoCCg IG9wZW4tc291cmNlIHNvZnR3YXJlIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgc3lzdGVtIGNvb3Jk aW5hdGlvbg0KPiCgIKAgoCBmb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIGF0IG5vIGNoYXJnZSB0byB0aGUgcHVi bGljLg0KPg0KPiCgIKAgoCBOT1csIFRIRVJFRk9SRSwgQkUgSVQgUkVTT0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgYSBQ cm9qZWN0IE1hbmFnZW1lbnQNCj4goCCgIKAgQ29tbWl0dGVlIChQTUMpLCB0byBiZSBrbm93biBh cyB0aGUgIkFwYWNoZSBab29LZWVwZXIgUHJvamVjdCIsDQo+IKAgoCCgIGJlIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkg aXMgZXN0YWJsaXNoZWQgcHVyc3VhbnQgdG8gQnlsYXdzIG9mIHRoZQ0KPiCgIKAgoCBGb3VuZGF0 aW9uOyBhbmQgYmUgaXQgZnVydGhlcg0KPg0KPiCgIKAgoCBSRVNPTFZFRCwgdGhhdCB0aGUgQXBh Y2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0IGJlIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkgaXMNCj4goCCgIKAgcmVzcG9uc2li bGUgZm9yIHRoZSBjcmVhdGlvbiBhbmQgbWFpbnRlbmFuY2Ugb2Ygc29mdHdhcmUNCj4goCCgIKAg cmVsYXRlZCB0byBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCBzeXN0ZW0gY29vcmRpbmF0aW9uOyBhbmQgYmUgaXQgZnVy dGhlcg0KPg0KPiCgIKAgoCBSRVNPTFZFRCwgdGhhdCB0aGUgb2ZmaWNlIG9mICJWaWNlIFByZXNp ZGVudCwgQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciIgYmUNCj4goCCgIKAgYW5kIGhlcmVieSBpcyBjcmVhdGVk LCB0aGUgcGVyc29uIGhvbGRpbmcgc3VjaCBvZmZpY2UgdG8NCj4goCCgIKAgc2VydmUgYXQgdGhl IGRpcmVjdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgQm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0b3JzIGFzIHRoZSBjaGFpcg0KPiCgIKAg oCBvZiB0aGUgQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0LCBhbmQgdG8gaGF2ZSBwcmltYXJ5IHJl c3BvbnNpYmlsaXR5DQo+IKAgoCCgIGZvciBtYW5hZ2VtZW50IG9mIHRoZSBwcm9qZWN0cyB3aXRo aW4gdGhlIHNjb3BlIG9mDQo+IKAgoCCgIHJlc3BvbnNpYmlsaXR5IG9mIHRoZSBBcGFjaGUgWm9v S2VlcGVyIFByb2plY3Q7IGFuZCBiZSBpdCBmdXJ0aGVyDQo+DQo+IKAgoCCgIFJFU09MVkVELCB0 aGF0IHRoZSBwZXJzb25zIGxpc3RlZCBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBiZWxvdyBiZSBhbmQNCj4goCCgIKAg aGVyZWJ5IGFyZSBhcHBvaW50ZWQgdG8gc2VydmUgYXMgdGhlIGluaXRpYWwgbWVtYmVycyBvZiB0 aGUNCj4goCCgIKAgQXBhY2hlIFpvb0tlZXBlciBQcm9qZWN0Og0KPg0KPiCgIKAgoCCgICogUGF0 cmljayBIdW50IKAgoCCgIKAgPHBodW50QGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+DQo+IKAgoCCgIKAgKiBGbGF2aW8g SnVucXVlaXJhIKAgoCA8ZnBqQGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+DQo+IKAgoCCgIKAgKiBNYWhhZGV2IEtvbmFy IKAgoCCgIKA8bWFoYWRldkBhcGFjaGUub3JnPg0KPiCgIKAgoCCgICogQmVuamFtaW4gUmVlZCCg IKAgoCCgPGJyZWVkQGFwYWNoZS5vcmc+DQo+IKAgoCCgIKAgKiBIZW5yeSBSb2JpbnNvbiCgIKAg oCA8aGVucnlAYXBhY2hlLm9yZz4NCj4NCj4goCCgIKAgTk9XLCBUSEVSRUZPUkUsIEJFIElUIEZV UlRIRVIgUkVTT0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgUGF0cmljayBIdW50DQo+IKAgoCCgIGJlIGFwcG9pbnRlZCB0 byB0aGUgb2ZmaWNlIG9mIFZpY2UgUHJlc2lkZW50LCBBcGFjaGUgWm9vS2VlcGVyLCB0bw0KPiCg IKAgoCBzZXJ2ZSBpbiBhY2NvcmRhbmNlIHdpdGggYW5kIHN1YmplY3QgdG8gdGhlIGRpcmVjdGlv biBvZiB0aGUNCj4goCCgIKAgQm9hcmQgb2YgRGlyZWN0b3JzIGFuZCB0aGUgQnlsYXdzIG9mIHRo ZSBGb3VuZGF0aW9uIHVudGlsDQo+IKAgoCCgIGRlYXRoLCByZXNpZ25hdGlvbiwgcmV0aXJlbWVu dCwgcmVtb3ZhbCBvciBkaXNxdWFsaWZpY2F0aW9uLA0KPiCgIKAgoCBvciB1bnRpbCBhIHN1Y2Nl c3NvciBpcyBhcHBvaW50ZWQ7IGFuZCBiZSBpdCBmdXJ0aGVyDQo+DQo+IKAgoCCgIFJFU09MVkVE LCB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbml0aWFsIEFwYWNoZSBab29LZWVwZXIgUE1DIGJlIGFuZCBoZXJlYnkgaXMN Cj4goCCgIKAgdGFza2VkIHdpdGggdGhlIGNyZWF0aW9uIG9mIGEgc2V0IG9mIGJ5bGF3cyBpbnRl bmRlZCB0bw0KPiCgIKAgoCBlbmNvdXJhZ2Ugb3BlbiBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBhbmQgaW5jcmVhc2Vk IHBhcnRpY2lwYXRpb24gaW4gdGhlDQo+IKAgoCCgIEFwYWNoZSBab29LZWVwZXIgUHJvamVjdDsg YW5kIGJlIGl0IGZ1cnRoZXINCj4NCj4goCCgIKAgUkVTT0xWRUQsIHRoYXQgdGhlIEFwYWNoZSBa b29LZWVwZXIgUHJvamVjdCBiZSBhbmQgaGVyZWJ5DQo+IKAgoCCgIGlzIHRhc2tlZCB3aXRoIHRo ZSBtaWdyYXRpb24gYW5kIHJhdGlvbmFsaXphdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgQXBhY2hlDQo+IKAgoCCgIEhh ZG9vcCBab29LZWVwZXIgc3ViLXByb2plY3Q7IGFuZCBiZSBpdCBmdXJ0aGVyDQo+DQo+IKAgoCCg IFJFU09MVkVELCB0aGF0IGFsbCByZXNwb25zaWJpbGl0aWVzIHBlcnRhaW5pbmcgdG8gdGhlIEFw YWNoZQ0KPiCgIKAgoCBIYWRvb3AgWm9vS2VlcGVyIHN1Yi1wcm9qZWN0IGVuY3VtYmVyZWQgdXBv biB0aGUNCj4goCCgIKAgQXBhY2hlIEhhZG9vcCBQcm9qZWN0IGFyZSBoZXJlYWZ0ZXIgZGlzY2hh cmdlZC4NCj4NCg== From general-return-2298-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 09:24:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61989 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 09:24:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 09:24:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 23838 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:24:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23541 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23533 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 09:24:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:24:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:24:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BB1B7DB4 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:24:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tR21yEtqCSer for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:24:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5169BB7DB1 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:24:18 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1288862637.1821@46H1BIBiFn0Xo8F0WJBO+g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o9S9Nt9p012045 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:23:55 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CC9412B.7030805@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:23:55 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o9S9Nt9p012045 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 27/10/10 19:04, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. +1 From general-return-2299-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 21:14:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85190 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 21:14:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 21:14:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17461 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16796 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16612 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 21:14:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:14:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:14:38 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so278271pwj.35 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+0MEBYv2WFnDOUDn2AlUqtbhwnzyMMeXhq48cUdKSU8=; b=Vs0Y99GzyPalrH8KStTf4U6iOohcaEItxX9uHQgMnAWHUfxsg7poOIiuWzOziHKmOg ULB2RmNXE7P6vegRVhviG1uJw24C3J0mvGLP2ZQdLgOK4ZeuRkOb4noCCUdHcSCOuVel t3a4fqkvvVlxGLGCVb76E0bNnXYlAf0zHCrVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hzn9/RClmUK6cGtpcAFHX5yl9fQlUMGCYLA9+rpWXVhyK/psL56Bk/z0/bJTNC7Ie+ dur2w9B36QjfJjwb8C/7EGUdC4dIf6AST0j9jHMB50ze7MUyvhLCzN2T/2kUQPEpUJHF EoCD31IcYg7QlX5xdH+LfOlepqDlf7AkdjiCI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.132.6 with SMTP id f6mr756519wfd.63.1288300457102; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.9 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:14:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2dd121c0f600493b3d302 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2dd121c0f600493b3d302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 Konstantin > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? Looks like everybody voted already. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to distributed system coordination > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache ZooKeeper Project: > > * Patrick Hunt > * Flavio Junqueira > * Mahadev Konar > * Benjamin Reed > * Henry Robinson > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > --000e0cd2dd121c0f600493b3d302-- From general-return-2300-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 21:45:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4078 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 21:45:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 21:45:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 86270 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:45:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86193 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86184 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 21:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:45:04 +0000 Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1824883gyg.35 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.190.18 with SMTP id n18mr21398722ybf.362.1288302282192; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [175.33.26.86] ([175.33.26.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v12sm1119951ybk.23.2010.10.28.14.44.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:43:35 +1100 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The vote needs to be done on the pmc list for it to be official. --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangelo On 29/10/2010, at 8:14 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > +1 > Konstantin > >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop > PMC? > > Looks like everybody voted already. > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a >> top-level Apache project. >> >> The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved >> ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It >> lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who >> has not been active on the project since it's inception >> http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. >> >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >> >> ------------ >> >> X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to distributed system coordination >> for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to distributed system coordination; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache ZooKeeper Project: >> >> * Patrick Hunt >> * Flavio Junqueira >> * Mahadev Konar >> * Benjamin Reed >> * Henry Robinson >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> From general-return-2301-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 22:22:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42226 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 22:22:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 22:22:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 38495 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 22:22:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38324 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 22:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38316 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 22:22:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:22:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:22:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 40939 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 22:21:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [172.29.12.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:21:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4CC9F784.3060004@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:21:56 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/28/2010 02:43 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > The vote needs to be done on the pmc list for it to be official. general@ is the Hadoop PMC's public list, as with the incubator. We hold all votes here that don't need to be held in private. Doug From general-return-2302-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 23:57:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79266 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 23:57:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 23:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 37171 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:57:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37131 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37123 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 23:57:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:57:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.209] (HELO nm17-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:56:59 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.194] by nm17.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2010 23:56:38 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.186] by tm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2010 23:56:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2010 23:56:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 860186.19127.bm@omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 83768 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Oct 2010 23:56:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1288310198; bh=WMnSVf+/dyypg5S+8gumBYqh87x6IuO2OkOLc8NTlEo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YvFH+hSN16axFbFqE3B/WwUWsxAntpmHuwgVg83ORkpIXtNf5ft42Qy/wKIyZVNzOxAwlC1G07S/xE88+kc90AtkRRdSh47/zgp+QP1RJGeYQbtFaX8HwFJCFwVNB/0loIeHswEBhTPXhc5IA1CfFXpGXM30cCttBQ/rqUJpszI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=06RKeGoiqSUx/OfhDhfOOFkAzBbBhKQs5AyqT4agOfxhum8fkH1NIvjWEM4Z7p0TPDIHRG0Ox6UtM6XwgcxImwWT++HBKezZwPepTBTdBVA6nRMsC6l7ZuP30pUwR5J/PwP361oYal4HRMebVRnvHlHt3KTLev0VZLGc0Y8CpbQ=; Message-ID: <582335.75741.qm@web56208.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: G_Z5WIAVM1mlpzqTVWtoYwfDswBvaCIwGg.2FXyw3zTpMfw 539Kj5oyQTdAn83WmN.gOHF.k86xZSDujWpuErR6y7IHcpRT5L8HC4CiJHgY mR3LRaLHqG5j6TMTB4EFwVYhGaTLl6SXhbEfIoBAcjE9JcR4jDJS3PBe_XZU tltf84YQBmVf9JheA8rnjk.dWxvDM3MXjC2ojsV8LKRMYGVsYJejzyJu7_gw XUAgIftgT2Pdu5JxIhl7TiYKzI6g588UvVW.zxV4Lj7yLbLj0DqqEl3dAu8e k7ZIeVVhmoiIeuBOuwe3QumlmUCEy.cChcZHivL_Hg_C6SDdkG24qtp6vfw8 22nbC1diii4sjaa7zlOSdYE0- Received: from [203.99.254.216] by web56208.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:56:38 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 References: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:56:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-949625388-1288310198=:75741" --0-949625388-1288310198=:75741 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +1 Nicholas ________________________________ From: Patrick Hunt To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 2:04:55 AM Subject: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a top-level Apache project. The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who has not been active on the project since it's inception http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? Regards, Patrick ------------ X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to distributed system coordination for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed system coordination; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache ZooKeeper Project: * Patrick Hunt * Flavio Junqueira * Mahadev Konar * Benjamin Reed * Henry Robinson NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. --0-949625388-1288310198=:75741-- From general-return-2303-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 00:01:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81393 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 00:01:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 00:01:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 44041 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:01:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43931 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:01:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43923 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 00:01:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:01:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:01:22 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so410788wwb.29 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:01:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=01we12Pc3NYJP6Ai3AO8vgC5vH/rVOSGAQnGF+O/dxo=; b=Iex4S3JnCcIvhLJHgTHwxWjHbFI7ynBVWphKyFloPSrqCRpqRBXylZtOPLO2R1sRmB FTgRf8w/FxmkyL9/iYkBiTwzjjGkdzO0mQLNTgxyKKreot+1H4PlLtxWKbi8XV2OyP3A cX/kLQcldg9qpgcyPfcNq6J4rGUU4soof6Wo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=X9g+XUDm7RQd2KA1B76PXhnZwohVRE4YL1U6r7yjHiF4ARry65e4bskstbsIxUGpUl /oAizMHbFOJYhzmU8ULhvH1dxXcH2OAj92tlFdwgvC1MNvK9RIyvl759jQmZvQQcW4oH 7hehCByU5F/ulpR+D0alGIjwZ4yunwZ8gInao= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.202 with SMTP id h52mr721580wek.46.1288310460732; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:01:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.93.74 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:01:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:01:00 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dqa_1JJORs8xXdr8EHJrhXxOD1Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > ------------ > > =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinati= on > =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project= ", > =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r" be > =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsi= bility > =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fur= ther > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r, to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby= is > =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apach= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2304-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 19:18:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16252 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 19:18:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 19:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 54834 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:18:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54678 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:18:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54664 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 19:18:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:18:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:18:35 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3279627fxm.35 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.89.135 with SMTP id e7mr5858254fam.129.1288379894523; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.146.1 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:18:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a477f2f1b20493c65117 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054a477f2f1b20493c65117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello All, I am trying to load a conf file located in hdfs. I was hoping following would work: Path apath = new Path(conf.get("fs.default.name"), "/home/shrijeet/blah.xml"); conf.addResource(apath); But I get following exception, Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml not found at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1297) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1227) File does exist however, [12:20][shrijeet@shrijeet-desktop]~$ hadoop dfs -ls hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml Found 1 items -rw-r--r-- 1 shrijeet shrijeet 488 2010-10-29 12:16 /home/shrijeet/blah.xml Thoughts? -Shrijeet --20cf3054a477f2f1b20493c65117-- From general-return-2305-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 19:39:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23587 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 19:39:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 19:39:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 77097 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77030 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77014 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 19:39:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:38:57 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3297184fxm.35 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:38:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.89.135 with SMTP id e7mr5881185fam.129.1288381116892; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.146.1 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a477cec95b0493c69a35 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054a477cec95b0493c69a35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I got it working by doing this (passing inputstream): conf.addResource(hdfs.open(apath)); Would still be interested in knowing insights if any one wants to share. -Shrijeet On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Hello All, > I am trying to load a conf file located in hdfs. > I was hoping following would work: > > Path apath = new Path(conf.get("fs.default.name"), > "/home/shrijeet/blah.xml"); > conf.addResource(apath); > > But I get following exception, > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml not found > at > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1297) > at > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1227) > > > File does exist however, > > [12:20][shrijeet@shrijeet-desktop]~$ hadoop dfs -ls > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml > Found 1 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 shrijeet shrijeet 488 2010-10-29 12:16 > /home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > Thoughts? > > -Shrijeet > --20cf3054a477cec95b0493c69a35-- From general-return-2306-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 19:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30204 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 19:55:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 19:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 16900 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16807 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16799 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 19:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:55:15 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o9TJTPgs009690 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:29:25 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 1E94130E4294; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id rEq9Me4ZhSVndFZC; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o9TJsrRH009512; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:53 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:53 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:54:52 -0500 Subject: RE: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS Thread-Topic: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS Thread-Index: Act3oPPXy9JjiXX4QhCGemJQKi2VSgAAJWSQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Insights? I'm sure someone will correct me...=20 What I saw was the overloaded method addResource(). Looking at the various methods' input: addResource(String name) :=3D name - resource to be added, the classpath = is examined for a file with that name. addResource(URL url) :=3D url - url of the resource to be added, the loca= l filesystem is examined directly to find the resource, without referring= to the classpath. addResource(Path file) :=3D file - file-path of resource to be added, the= local filesystem is examined directly to find the resource, without refe= rring to the classpath. And then: addResource(InputStream in) :=3D in - InputStream to deserialize the obje= ct from. The first 3 specifically are looking for a local file. (Unix file system)= =2E The last one take a generic InputStream which could come from a Unix file= or an HDFS file. It looks like the initial intention of loading configuration information = was from Unix and then HDFS was an afterthought. (My Guess). HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Shrijeet Paliwal [mailto:shrijeet@rocketfuel.com]=20 Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:39 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS I got it working by doing this (passing inputstream): conf.addResource(hdfs.open(apath)); Would still be interested in knowing insights if any one wants to share. -Shrijeet On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Hello All, > I am trying to load a conf file located in hdfs. > I was hoping following would work: > > Path apath =3D new Path(conf.get("fs.default.name"), > "/home/shrijeet/blah.xml"); > conf.addResource(apath); > > But I get following exception, > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml not found > at > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:12= 97) > at > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1= 227) > > > File does exist however, > > [12:20][shrijeet@shrijeet-desktop]~$ hadoop dfs -ls > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml > Found 1 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 shrijeet shrijeet 488 2010-10-29 12:16 > /home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > Thoughts? > > -Shrijeet > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2307-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 20:17:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43314 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 20:17:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 20:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 35382 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 20:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35330 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 20:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35315 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 20:17:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:17:10 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3332299fxm.35 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.2 with SMTP id q2mr397863fal.53.1288383408541; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.146.1 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:16:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:16:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30433ee86691e20493c7239d --20cf30433ee86691e20493c7239d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah addResource with InputStream as input is the friend. I got trapped by the notion that since its taking Path as an argument, it will respect the scheme specified in the path. But if you look into the implementation of loadResource // Can't use FileSystem API or we get an infinite loop // since FileSystem uses Configuration API. Use java.io.File instead. File file = new File(((Path)name).toUri().getPath()).getAbsoluteFile(); This guy just looks at path component. On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Insights? > > I'm sure someone will correct me... > > What I saw was the overloaded method addResource(). > > Looking at the various methods' input: > addResource(String name) := name - resource to be added, the classpath is > examined for a file with that name. > addResource(URL url) := url - url of the resource to be added, the local > filesystem is examined directly to find the resource, without referring to > the classpath. > addResource(Path file) := file - file-path of resource to be added, the > local filesystem is examined directly to find the resource, without > referring to the classpath. > > And then: > > addResource(InputStream in) := in - InputStream to deserialize the object > from. > > The first 3 specifically are looking for a local file. (Unix file system). > > The last one take a generic InputStream which could come from a Unix file > or an HDFS file. > > It looks like the initial intention of loading configuration information > was from Unix and then HDFS was an afterthought. (My Guess). > > HTH > > -Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shrijeet Paliwal [mailto:shrijeet@rocketfuel.com] > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:39 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS > > I got it working by doing this (passing inputstream): > > conf.addResource(hdfs.open(apath)); > > Would still be interested in knowing insights if any one wants to share. > > -Shrijeet > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > I am trying to load a conf file located in hdfs. > > I was hoping following would work: > > > > Path apath = new Path(conf.get("fs.default.name"), > > "/home/shrijeet/blah.xml"); > > conf.addResource(apath); > > > > But I get following exception, > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: > > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml not found > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1297) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1227) > > > > > > File does exist however, > > > > [12:20][shrijeet@shrijeet-desktop]~$ hadoop dfs -ls > > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > Found 1 items > > -rw-r--r-- 1 shrijeet shrijeet 488 2010-10-29 12:16 > > /home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Shrijeet > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > --20cf30433ee86691e20493c7239d-- From general-return-2308-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 01:40:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67830 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 63409 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 01:40:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63251 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 01:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63237 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 01:40:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:40:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.17] (HELO col0-omc1-s7.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:40:04 +0000 Received: from COL117-W9 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s7.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:39:42 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_4d38faf5-95c1-401e-911c-d2d52d0359f9_" X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.33] From: Michael Segel To: CC: Subject: RE: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:39:43 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2010 01:39:42.0785 (UTC) FILETIME=[53330B10:01CB77D3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_4d38faf5-95c1-401e-911c-d2d52d0359f9_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well the reason I kind of felt that it was added as an after thought is tha= t you kind of have a chicken/egg situation. I mean if you want to read a config file from HDFS=2C your application has = to already know how to access the cloud so it had to read a=20 configuration file. So the main use case would be to specify the custom con= figuration file before you actually connect to the cloud. I think that the input stream is more generic and can be used universally. = (Another reason why I thought it might have been done as an add on. I mean = if you did this as your first attempt=2C why then overload the method?) HTH -Mike > Date: Fri=2C 29 Oct 2010 13:16:48 -0700 > Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS > From: shrijeet@rocketfuel.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > CC: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > Yeah addResource with InputStream as input is the friend. >=20 > I got trapped by the notion that since its taking Path as an argument=2C = it > will respect the scheme specified in the path. > But if you look into the implementation of loadResource >=20 > // Can't use FileSystem API or we get an infinite loop > // since FileSystem uses Configuration API. Use java.io.File > instead. > File file =3D new > File(((Path)name).toUri().getPath()).getAbsoluteFile()=3B >=20 > This guy just looks at path component. >=20 > On Fri=2C Oct 29=2C 2010 at 12:54 PM=2C Segel=2C Mike = wrote: >=20 > > Insights? > > > > I'm sure someone will correct me... > > > > What I saw was the overloaded method addResource(). > > > > Looking at the various methods' input: > > addResource(String name) :=3D name - resource to be added=2C the classp= ath is > > examined for a file with that name. > > addResource(URL url) :=3D url - url of the resource to be added=2C the = local > > filesystem is examined directly to find the resource=2C without referri= ng to > > the classpath. > > addResource(Path file) :=3D file - file-path of resource to be added=2C= the > > local filesystem is examined directly to find the resource=2C without > > referring to the classpath. > > > > And then: > > > > addResource(InputStream in) :=3D in - InputStream to deserialize the ob= ject > > from. > > > > The first 3 specifically are looking for a local file. (Unix file syste= m). > > > > The last one take a generic InputStream which could come from a Unix fi= le > > or an HDFS file. > > > > It looks like the initial intention of loading configuration informatio= n > > was from Unix and then HDFS was an afterthought. (My Guess). > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shrijeet Paliwal [mailto:shrijeet@rocketfuel.com] > > Sent: Friday=2C October 29=2C 2010 2:39 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org=3B mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Loading conf file sitting in HDFS > > > > I got it working by doing this (passing inputstream): > > > > conf.addResource(hdfs.open(apath))=3B > > > > Would still be interested in knowing insights if any one wants to share= . > > > > -Shrijeet > > > > On Fri=2C Oct 29=2C 2010 at 12:18 PM=2C Shrijeet Paliwal > > wrote: > > > > > Hello All=2C > > > I am trying to load a conf file located in hdfs. > > > I was hoping following would work: > > > > > > Path apath =3D new Path(conf.get("fs.default.name")=2C > > > "/home/shrijeet/blah.xml")=3B > > > conf.addResource(apath)=3B > > > > > > But I get following exception=2C > > > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: > > > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml not found > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:12= 97) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1= 227) > > > > > > > > > File does exist however=2C > > > > > > [12:20][shrijeet@shrijeet-desktop]~$ hadoop dfs -ls > > > hdfs://localhost:8020/home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > > Found 1 items > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 shrijeet shrijeet 488 2010-10-29 12:16 > > > /home/shrijeet/blah.xml > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -Shrijeet > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is > > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not > > the intended recipient=2C you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n=2C > > distribution=2C or copying of this communication=2C or any of its conte= nts=2C is > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error= =2C > > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and an= y > > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > = --_4d38faf5-95c1-401e-911c-d2d52d0359f9_-- From general-return-2309-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 07:41:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92284 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 07:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 07:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 80799 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 07:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80320 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 07:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80305 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 07:41:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:41:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:41:06 +0000 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so1072679vws.35 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLxFlyHAdL/yIe/IBfayhDWXPqCDvekmLJ6IXY19/HY=; b=ShTZxtCWG7bCBSv/YqVrpOj4GHGD2x6+uWjAdCU5RbbW8RjCfk+KaxueWzP7SMotnp UU96GXeLdf3luwSX1TRVhkRlg0+kafw1WIJQOp34meM49oK7nBIm7m1gO7v6tNxlBSnZ VImVjuqtHX7LbBkxS2EwN5hWCpMg8O4CxPZWE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o9NoW7+T+ylNsUlIxmZTbm4abweuAkgWmnMxyZwcrDLsnTQOI5ay0iIMVI2L5dpnJ0 53wExGC4Qungj2bxIJbZ1HRdWtdLYCPgvWBA3FBxSFLQicEKNZ+lsaEEfcJ8S0sMfyUq YSCE7SHt+rF3ETIqwhOXBZXtfE6Dc4lleweRU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.188.2 with SMTP id cy2mr5774774qab.212.1288424445640; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.181.138 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:10:45 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > top-level Apache project. > > The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > has not been active on the project since it's inception > http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > ------------ > > =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinati= on > =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project= ", > =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r" be > =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary responsi= bility > =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fur= ther > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeepe= r, to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby= is > =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apach= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2310-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 18:15:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64079 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 18:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 18:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17436 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 18:15:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17360 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 18:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17352 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 18:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:15:09 +0000 Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so1722831vws.35 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:14:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.198.5 with SMTP id em5mr3387065qab.335.1288462487691; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.15.70 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:14:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <253774F2-2590-4E67-BB5B-86FE5BD5A555@linkedin.com> References: <4CC0BEED.2020200@yahoo-inc.com> <06380AD8-CC00-4983-A93D-7DE01EE60753@yahoo-inc.com> <253774F2-2590-4E67-BB5B-86FE5BD5A555@linkedin.com> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:14:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bringing the codebases back in line From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> - The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying >> to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache >> supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris). > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Oh come now Eli. =A0Just say it: I push everyone really ha= rd on making things multiple platform to the point of being as trollish as = this Ian fellow that started this thread. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Most of the Linux-specific modifications that I've seen th= at have been submitted are specifically to avoid configuring the system pro= perly*, built in such a way that they weren't pluggable for other operating= systems, or could be done in a much more POSIX/OS-agnostic way. =A0The fac= t that there are parts of Hadoop that don't work properly on Mac OS X (desp= ite the overwhelming number of Mac laptops in use by Hadoop core devs) alwa= ys struck me as particularly funny when people get frustrated with me when = I point this problems out. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0It is also worth mentioning that, AFAIK, only Linux and AI= X have OS-specific code in Hadoop. =A0Attempts to get fixes (not even featu= res!) for specific issues for other operating systems have been fully rejec= ted with the cry of "we the community don't want to support specific OS iss= ues in the core", even tho some of them are direct hinderance to the proper= operation of Hadoop on those OSes. =A0We have a very big double standard a= t work here. Hey Allen, Sorry for the slow response, Google marked this as spam ;) Are there outstanding issues building Hadoop on OSX/Solaris? I thought we got all those in trunk. Thanks, Eli From general-return-288-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 05:17:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70318 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 05:17:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 05:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5162 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:17:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5081 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5071 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 05:17:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:17:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.148 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.148] (HELO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:17:38 +0000 Received: from d23relay02.au.ibm.com (d23relay02.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.244]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n615H5O8026571 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:17:05 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay02.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n615HFNe884786 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:17:15 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n615HFg4004197 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:17:15 +1000 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n615HEES004162; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:17:15 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4A3BDF80.5070807@yahoo-inc.com> To: Konstantin Shvachko Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Feng WF Wang , dong.bo@mail.xjtu.edu.cn MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Jie Qiu Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:17:20 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 07/01/2009 13:17:21, Serialize complete at 07/01/2009 13:17:21 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001D0AFA482575E6_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 001D0AFA482575E6_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Dear Shv I created new item for Hadoop HA in Hadoop. So, we can use it to start our discussion and put the feature in the roadmap of hadoop. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 ================================================== True insight comes from within! Qiu Jie Cloud Computing Technology IBM China Research Lab. Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 FAX: 8610-58748330 Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com ================================================== --=_alternative 001D0AFA482575E6_=-- From general-return-289-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 14:35:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62954 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 14:35:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 14:35:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23558 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 14:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23513 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 14:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23496 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 14:35:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:35:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:35:36 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so451406vwj.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vHuCNp0JedKXaflJ7/o3kD/sUjIUkuO1gaSNa0mQCkM=; b=UoWx6KlscDP2xrbJC5hd+nWvVyadjwZdrqFwmLrt0CfqqbulLF4PkifRGvlWUuDmXG 84MblYf6nQTXivL3CEP6KIsCfhJpZ2WHi88mI634KToRwcPeQSqHjarDK+kHS733A8Ca EUh1MsB9UhZn0uDx6JBmdTX9WSfsFEflblSXo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bQMuDH57dt0GimZgjupBoeVT9kDAL1tCp/Vq/WVr1+Dva+WAfvnFP8MuoqsiQgZsmZ asbLv649ZB5HM4FfHaRabxEAPT6mg6nic3H5Wf1luZGp1So65jlaF+72Tbw2fWbJC44g WyePBYe3Kgu2Cb7hIyWfu9KChPK1SOyEF2q+U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.71.20 with SMTP id f20mr9001341vcj.70.1246458915125; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:35:15 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> Subject: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6475d18dcfc12046da5d4a5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6475d18dcfc12046da5d4a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run on psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? Thanks! (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. (2) execution steps and ouput $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa Generating public/private dsa key pair. Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. The key fingerprint is: a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase): Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory paper. " $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys no output $ ssh localhost The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. xxx@localhost's password: --0016e6475d18dcfc12046da5d4a5-- From general-return-290-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 15:19:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78111 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 15:19:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 15:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3218 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 15:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3136 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 15:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3126 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 15:20:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:20:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:19:57 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so379824qwh.35 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vyGAoU8Qr9Xmda7cpYufjslSa1Ne51VvtxN+U1D+CtU=; b=m6PZ2cec3zUfOEF7nukV4OTTpWSkz5jI/L8dRcQlb2WXHDnh96SbUAwb76l0SXiEEt zWuuyPKkAYJEZRY9UpV82u8/FFK+1ZEKUPrR8ISptGd8noIxSeoX9bNiPxyocm9pDStz Xb1UVxuN7QycAX6qkVDFdXdECrM1Js/UuNEPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HwtWqxc3rnxR0DUDRoaTKkk2ZL9u97FIQfVB80+CGA8djeAvRWvMNgt4vVTRi378qu 8IgQHhvDpDI4HHxg7DqTiQQi+p0u/nLLnoF+VuQCybpGzgdDI2+ZLaP9urJ7d2EujJIf uIHbDDvwyD8+HbdB9TzKgZbkfEzSm/MHPMzUs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.14.70 with SMTP id f6mr2457756iba.9.1246461576265; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 17:19:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: I have a problem is sending you an email From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532cb647ac0da046da6737c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221532cb647ac0da046da6737c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo, I am trying to send an email as a follow up to my previous one that I have sent yesterday, but for some reasons my email is filtered. Do you have any filtering rules on the content of the email, title of the email,... thank you for helping,me --00221532cb647ac0da046da6737c-- From general-return-291-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 16:16:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8746 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 16:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 16:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 94014 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 16:16:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93959 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 16:16:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93948 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 16:16:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:16:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:16:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c44.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.44]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n61GFM2b004992 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=algaMinGqSXM2z2FLw52ejAD57MOWOPzer6Df2EDFDxtD4YVysP3IwZGgRHG9bNy Message-ID: <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:15:21 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 Cos On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: > Hi all, > > I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input > password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run on > psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? > Thanks! > > (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. > > (2) execution steps and ouput > > $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > Generating public/private dsa key pair. > Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. > Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. > The key fingerprint is: > a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx > > > **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no > passphrase): > Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory paper. > " > > $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > no output > > $ ssh localhost > The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. > RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > xxx@localhost's password: From general-return-292-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 17:16:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35966 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 17:16:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 17:16:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 4821 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4751 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4741 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 17:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:16:19 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so900633pxi.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:15:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u/DKF2sN2nBHr6KBPUjPDsCAGsf+F8otNVoecBpHleg=; b=RQjnLGfT18Oy+XC+/ldLfUs5/jgL9TfY6beK5MlTAzrjd1S+GaNHXQ2Xc9Rto0vVFY tMUenSwW4DoGPU8chID5LbgV9tPxLZJfdkYNR2Q6H70rYvTAigaGCbCFr2xUfdncmUQ3 AUKlOpX7sOISHdyjlUeDOZKShgwv8485wSZ/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fiM4SH061sJDkJi2rx5wF7SfOAnLkFOmkmX+Vw9siJoH1ee4yCgiXJRDbglILBlGEP Rh8vv2p34uPKQsNQNSadRG9c+3K+IvTGuDRuetPQGlbHP5oJXao5JeSbNPbAuEJdk1ss ww2gCLcDNNzOsDH9QecxaodF3n5YzaI1ZJDNo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.104.19 with SMTP id b19mr1113091wfc.185.1246468559366; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:15:59 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: 0.20: Configured Capacity: 0 (0 KB) From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello! Not sure I am on right mailing list, because I had a hard time to subscribe to at least one of those listed... Sorry in advance. I've just installed pretty much standard way on a 4 nodes hadoop cluster, redirected all tmp/fsimage stuff to a pretty much solid space, but I am getting zero capacity and inability to put any kind of file. Is this is a correct behavior? If no, what I am missing, please? Version: 0.20, Java 1.6 Update 13. I see no tracebacks, no errors, no warnings in any logs. Directories are all writable by hadoop user and no problem with a space. All daemons are running, everything looks OK so far. Just zero capacity filesystem that are already 100% full. Thanks! $ hadoop dfsadmin -report Configured Capacity: 0 (0 KB) Present Capacity: 27648 (27 KB) DFS Remaining: 0 (0 KB) DFS Used: 27648 (27 KB) DFS Used%: 100% Under replicated blocks: 0 Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0 Missing blocks: 0 ------------------------------------------------- Datanodes available: 3 (3 total, 0 dead) Name: 192.168.1.242:50010 Decommission Status : Normal Configured Capacity: 0 (0 KB) DFS Used: 9216 (9 KB) Non DFS Used: 0 (0 KB) DFS Remaining: 0(0 KB) DFS Used%: 100% DFS Remaining%: 0% Last contact: Thu Jul 02 02:03:06 JST 2009 Name: 192.168.1.241:50010 Decommission Status : Normal Configured Capacity: 0 (0 KB) DFS Used: 9216 (9 KB) Non DFS Used: 0 (0 KB) DFS Remaining: 0(0 KB) DFS Used%: 100% DFS Remaining%: 0% Last contact: Thu Jul 02 02:03:04 JST 2009 Name: 192.168.1.243:50010 Decommission Status : Normal Configured Capacity: 0 (0 KB) DFS Used: 9216 (9 KB) Non DFS Used: 0 (0 KB) DFS Remaining: 0(0 KB) DFS Used%: 100% DFS Remaining%: 0% Last contact: Thu Jul 02 02:03:04 JST 2009 -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-293-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 18:55:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2714 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 18:55:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 18:55:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 43847 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:55:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43793 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:55:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43783 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 18:55:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:55:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:55:23 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so990064pzk.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9xItdnLVk0VFGJowT00MxTuwSX23xrR95zubhwOIQOo=; b=TWOGWItBSLzSFhlkYWRUaQucy85U9D9CxWWyUX4b+gLOoojqWqGPhti43LFkpPcTDG kEYvoFrkmbhtM1Gr0bYooHOWMXaIZz+QWrOi+vt8VT43K48e0J1DHnZHKHfUuYZ06qg3 QgSWYdUA9VmCGs9c/EaDsUURFdsMQgWxjponU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tNDku90edpOiz0SyAx6BLA/D5WRnTRTY9eYn15xmllCVIwZsTXi/8sVUL3KJIVrMu2 8zkNGsPSdGSUWsKOHpmTzSE9BFz13HlA0mHNqHqfjUHk26GuMGKxb41p4/9ZY5Mggjsu cKw4rS1oawB+heAtB2C13QBUB6VrQAP/cpBZ4= Received: by 10.142.154.14 with SMTP id b14mr831413wfe.67.1246474502783; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm4833064wfi.32.2009.07.01.11.55.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:54:59 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev > all jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues I'd like to remove create/resolved/reopen from the -issues lists, so that folks who subscribe to both lists do not see such events twice. This would change the policy to: - create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev - all *other* jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues Objections? Doug From general-return-294-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 19:04:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7204 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 19:04:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 19:04:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 58690 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:04:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58596 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58586 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 19:04:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:04:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:04:43 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n61J2v1X043326 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=sn26EECsmqa2fp3R+JI3M446SEONasm8zJAL6GAdrpLFcN6rFacRinz0qk68KQkn Message-Id: <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:02:57 -0700 References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev >> all jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues > > I'd like to remove create/resolved/reopen from the -issues lists, so > that folks who subscribe to both lists do not see such events twice. > This would change the policy to: > > - create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}- > dev > - all *other* jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues > > Objections? > -1 from me. The create/resolve/reopen traffic is very minor compared to the comments. I'd prefer to have the whole thread in one place (*-issues) rather than fiddle with multiple mailboxes. *smile* Arun From general-return-295-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 19:07:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8279 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 19:07:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 19:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 62915 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62845 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62835 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 19:07:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.214] (HELO web56205.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:07:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 39068 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jul 2009 19:06:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1246475212; bh=54x5iP1gpscCkuej+eMtBXvl/scpGMmvosCbTuVGdF8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SX7PaFcOFrmb47cgS5IzLN03PNWX+2P/isVrSvTtESjPLd8TO7jNKtK3hxugq2WIuGcIFIRq+89dAH/egaH0l03w6taLcbxXOGXlaXgKQ3fiHKc92BVbYI30ucdLSQ9oQxTvgjInb+FpwyecScxEG9wc3iAAtCcNPx3fUcCuFXk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sEIurb0PHeJfJ0QGoEBM1JpYgCRCKvKrKOBVmDLs/0PNFMURT0JDmQFCXslXK2KmRSmRXinqj7V8Cm5W3k2JyZwQNgdszrFl3qDPRWUX3SozQu/FiSenkmB5nJ/wow4RPshFfUrp/I8u1Nb1/zgB7cyIhGim91C9/KuiEgzUJqI=; Message-ID: <177936.38438.qm@web56205.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4bGNIRUVM1nbHtVNLCB8XTzd0DSbOF9GqzIEuxuofgttMRrtY5b_Oylid.77Daop4Lpu2KqTVyGDiaSnD.OQk0pAw4la4_iuQNcnLCHnrFKarKgJz.yIBjP5rU.I0C2cMnDESRDFNsJwE21JLI_0DFZhkvlRmH.KG60HybxukcqgOy7hKFjKPU286Eth0BmucukkEIqrnBx9kkQwb8tuMoi5_W_hyuVe0RQXaAx_9xQ_8leOgGDWTQ8Ly6IOZ2B7aBb2XbiOW_dTTLb3CZZ0fsf8k44PgY7MFpDsq0uEH6NEET2SVXUYiS6v1dkkDGBFmlByamDry14klbkr28_bbCbTKbbEOIXbxVprL8Xz Received: from [216.145.54.15] by web56205.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:06:51 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1357.22 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:06:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 on Doug's suggestion. I am getting > 100 emails everyday. I map the emails to different accounts. It is good to reduce it. Otherwise, I probably need to put them on hdfs. :) Nicholas Sze ----- Original Message ---- > From: Doug Cutting > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 11:54:59 AM > Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce > > Owen O'Malley wrote: > > create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev > > all jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues > > I'd like to remove create/resolved/reopen from the -issues lists, so that folks > who subscribe to both lists do not see such events twice. This would change the > policy to: > > - create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev > - all *other* jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues > > Objections? > > Doug From general-return-296-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 19:22:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20418 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 19:22:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 19:22:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 89220 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89159 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 19:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89149 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 19:23:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:23:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:22:51 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so1004972pzk.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QFUpPJKMHDXrgQAU5QUYanr0IPGfZMXduc+L+dctW7s=; b=hAb9892AwT5J1Z4v0Xt9r8wRsn90TTn5/ahd/jSbdks4qmchQkYVErLZMJwvkI2Yx4 H5bfn2+7pSXLECuc/vsjaKTcvemp1XjN3OUYjhELWk/ao3g0hYB8NsqN6vSduWdIv+yJ BvO+Qy1wgIAzRWrd9IWsoFjsK0XrsnyP0X6e4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Vmao7nE4dml6FyyjbWgmRbZQCa5lZLEhIf5x3x4BBd5R5Mt9reL0KXDP8HDLgl4/tV zlAxSyNnsh8nBKPo70thPyq2eEUJvi8Z2BrezrzhG+ZggqIiVv0h0OlmaIfVTxl26jCA 6yshi92gaFgISDfFEPsZFkEfXSpQ9U+p9RHEg= Received: by 10.142.79.12 with SMTP id c12mr1301132wfb.286.1246476148717; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm4643795wff.38.2009.07.01.12.22.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:22:25 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Arun C Murthy wrote: > -1 from me. > The create/resolve/reopen traffic is very minor compared to the > comments. I'd prefer to have the whole thread in one place (*-issues) > rather than fiddle with multiple mailboxes. *smile* I assume you mean "thread" loosely, since all messages related to an issue are not threaded together by any mail reader that I know of, since Jira changes the subject and does not set a "References" or "In-Reply-To" header. You subscribe to both lists and really prefer receiving create/resolve messages twice? I subscribe to both, and have a filter that marks-as-read messages sent to -issues, so I have the full set of messages available to searches, but only am notified about new and watched issues. Doug From general-return-297-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 20:06:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35883 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 20:06:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 20:06:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 73152 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:06:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:06:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73062 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 20:06:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:06:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:06:44 +0000 Received: from [10.72.104.137] (goodenter-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n61K62Jd073418 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=2CcdXRseXKyTxPW/ZnpWSn7FxxB5t7yH8oOmkltLllK9gyXe4R/5543G+MA6AX41 Message-ID: <4A4BC1AA.3060901@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:06:02 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/1/09 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Arun C Murthy wrote: >> -1 from me. >> The create/resolve/reopen traffic is very minor compared to the >> comments. I'd prefer to have the whole thread in one place (*-issues) >> rather than fiddle with multiple mailboxes. *smile* > > I assume you mean "thread" loosely, since all messages related to an > issue are not threaded together by any mail reader that I know of, since > Jira changes the subject and does not set a "References" or > "In-Reply-To" header. Actually, Thunderbird and Mutt are at least two which does thread JIRA's threads properly. The way they do so is exactly by using Message-ID and In-Reply-To fields of a RFC-822 header. Cos > You subscribe to both lists and really prefer receiving create/resolve > messages twice? > > I subscribe to both, and have a filter that marks-as-read messages sent > to -issues, so I have the full set of messages available to searches, > but only am notified about new and watched issues. > > Doug From general-return-298-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 20:29:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41930 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 20:29:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 20:29:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9480 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:29:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9402 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9392 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 20:29:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:29:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.171] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:29:23 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so433761wfg.2 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:29:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QiO5E9NlYw/D9pmxZPj3ynYSAnXyDMLMOf2w2Sfx3tw=; b=VbANDl3g4hUs3iAdXOo9cbtrp9yEVfMugO31nABKewGSWpVaRvi1Yx4gd90ldIUANu ayJF8rr9zZ/qR78WnwamtLxNv2b/fNX8nJ7Y1RL7Sl6EjIZns8SgUO5m4Ul8qlSyD3M2 HtrVwfUjAHm15Fj+RIb0aatkJ/cxJM00q7VYE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z6zgL6WsuFyOUHMswHDVAO7f4s/7h5BEAqKRYPA3POQyvkYBe/8uwbCcUqTcAJZfxR BjubEzXmhEQ9FSps/pixFxsP2oGCEWwauu4ILL8oS+u20tt374WURD8WjsCdzGSIEmvO 3RZZ50pBjRbg3/RYAT07mxmPGcMcE7B5TxK7A= Received: by 10.142.100.12 with SMTP id x12mr1301253wfb.206.1246480143614; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm4794241wfd.24.2009.07.01.13.29.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4BC70C.9080900@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:29:00 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> <4A4BC1AA.3060901@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4A4BC1AA.3060901@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Actually, Thunderbird and Mutt are at least two which does thread JIRA's > threads properly. > > The way they do so is exactly by using Message-ID and In-Reply-To fields > of a RFC-822 header. The Message-ID is different for each message, and is thus alone not useful for threading. I don't see an In-Reply-To header in Jira-sent messages, nor a References header. These are the preferred means for threading according to RFC2822, although some readers thread by subject too. Thus all comments relative to an issue may be threaded, but not together with other updates, like assignment, attachment, etc., since these use different subjects. For example, do you see these headers in http://tinyurl.com/lw3cse? Doug From general-return-299-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 20:42:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45416 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 20:42:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 20:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 33274 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:42:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33196 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:42:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33186 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 20:42:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:42:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:42:20 +0000 Received: from [10.72.104.137] (goodenter-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n61KeUt6080347 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HmtoJJx1QCWabN2n2HgMhvlmjT/lJxtGBSSKj3zdCAyaI3YnuVrinlXow127F6FF Message-ID: <4A4BC9BE.5060408@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:40:30 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> <4A4BC1AA.3060901@yahoo-inc.com> <4A4BC70C.9080900@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A4BC70C.9080900@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug, Message-ID is unique. However, what I can see in my mail is that all subsequent emails (after JIRA created message) have its Message-ID in their In-Reply-To field. Say, Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6110) test-patch takes 45min! Thread-Topic: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6110) test-patch takes 45min! Thread-Index: Acn2Jd4/MZg/3jVETQKT5ZEGzVtNCA== Message-ID: <1892144747.1245997027374.JavaMail.jira@brutus> List-Help: and Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6110) test-patch takes 45min! Thread-Topic: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6110) test-patch takes 45min! Thread-Index: Acn4rGYcaU6FaceJSyGggrQ+1INmpg== Message-ID: <1159605925.1246274687243.JavaMail.jira@brutus> List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: In-Reply-To: <1892144747.1245997027374.JavaMail.jira@brutus> I don't see In-Reply-To field in the example you've sent to me. Is it because some tags are being stripped out by mail archiving software? Cos On 7/1/09 1:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> Actually, Thunderbird and Mutt are at least two which does thread JIRA's >> threads properly. >> >> The way they do so is exactly by using Message-ID and In-Reply-To fields >> of a RFC-822 header. > > The Message-ID is different for each message, and is thus alone not > useful for threading. I don't see an In-Reply-To header in Jira-sent > messages, nor a References header. These are the preferred means for > threading according to RFC2822, although some readers thread by subject > too. Thus all comments relative to an issue may be threaded, but not > together with other updates, like assignment, attachment, etc., since > these use different subjects. > > For example, do you see these headers in http://tinyurl.com/lw3cse? > > Doug > > > > From general-return-300-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 02:03:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 388 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 02:03:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 02:03:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 50108 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 02:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50042 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 02:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50032 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 02:03:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:03:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:03:08 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so1170453pzk.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:02:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P6TBPMqnhTn/sAqf+CY8Q3FK/u1z7j3/O+iCs+6+UH0=; b=U7JogvrbUIWVeBNqKr1JCrZi7jZWuRTqqnfO++PGPo1ZgahBTZShtHuLnZgu78x76T YzNt8QFOc29J3lGrfacmoFgrNGUpXbY68yQA+VzJrLqvajCaPUlzoCc9463xpyJRivAo UJVUH4zG2ZJdK9+ioeQkcvaiyxIEUFyo+jQQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rxOerbsz+xz2A+X1sKWbrNZjFhgFzwQiNUEbHOpbWUL+BsqHz/9zllynkshPhH9qsy im7d1hljgW5XqLkRtOoYKOXs9UswYrrNtrelSHy1hI+qniXV7ANnn8vVAQ/L89ACAttR dd5zyH4Bk+wXwf06kKjzUL5tXVC/GhSL4vZaM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.246.20 with SMTP id t20mr1285708wfh.181.1246500167886; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:02:47 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Mailing lists are broken? From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello. Tried http://hadoop.apache.org/core/mailing_lists.html Address "core-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org" returns error. Is that's OK? -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-301-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 05:11:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64200 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 05:11:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 05:11:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 78770 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:11:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78547 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78537 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 05:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:11:29 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so839381vwj.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:11:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8PQ12GXd1XJ6wG/RFgmMpHmwwt36qZBqBqMmRKuw/5g=; b=szEuS7QQ78msdNBSlZSaTm2uoO8AKu/EogeD74deGQJKd1cJQo2ljPS0NKkAbYYeTi wgDrZlU9tbi/A9ShsRLjjv3YzuzENm61HLqRUxVgMID4RwTEn5MQD6ZM6tphmot3jM/j /dhOv31bHpw6FnKiaPsKg1t36hTLuEHb5rgF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eOHYtAJcrJADb4m1oBb5ov4WL1aIPEDngPa2PxWOi7GglOg4mvACfnpxcLej1Xc7Wp 48+bpzeXivc96TJpEn5S80996B/RlabD5ybJSfXb7IhltM0uSfQosSmlDIzk3iMHeKj6 kQMZQzJbNDrQoemyOV2ggdFuKWW2F0gCnKXWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.72.79 with SMTP id l15mr8333999vcj.4.1246511468614; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:11:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:11:08 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64755aa4b95e1046db2118b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64755aa4b95e1046db2118b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't work. Thanks anyway ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 > > Cos > > > On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run on >> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >> Thanks! >> >> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >> >> (2) execution steps and ouput >> >> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >> The key fingerprint is: >> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >> >> >> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >> passphrase): >> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >> paper. >> " >> >> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >> no output >> >> $ ssh localhost >> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. >> RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. >> xxx@localhost's password: >> > --0016e64755aa4b95e1046db2118b-- From general-return-302-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 05:18:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66751 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 05:18:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 05:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 84565 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84495 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84485 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 05:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:18:43 +0000 Received: from [192.168.102.128] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c179.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.179]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n625I833078548 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mnbWGIubH/4ldClQmm+yCwFk+jD6mHH4Ubl1uD/w0YFp6cJQRwlx8NkJJ0CqYDWA Message-ID: <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:18:07 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to accept publickey as a valid authorization mean. Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to the following: debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password,keyboard-interactive debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). Cos On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: > I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't work. > Thanks anyway > > ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys > -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnikwrote: > >> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >> >> Cos >> >> >> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run on >>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >>> Thanks! >>> >>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>> >>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>> >>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>> The key fingerprint is: >>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>> >>> >>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>> passphrase): >>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >>> paper. >>> " >>> >>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>> no output >>> >>> $ ssh localhost >>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. >>> RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. >>> xxx@localhost's password: >>> From general-return-303-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 05:51:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87290 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 05:51:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 05:51:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24541 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:51:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24460 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 05:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24450 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 05:51:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:51:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:51:39 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so849797vwj.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:51:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gIYFVxl742VOZs6j1CjQxzM1PMiRvoOnSDlGhjCbpsg=; b=iuF7MQ5R3SkvO4HkPBPzmQHt14+JjDPoyyKfdcXL7d6N8hPO5QFOKFs3/x9Zby4BrJ cQXi0ULKVug3v0qY7tPIz6c2z8cyREP8NWjoMvnlq6MUY/rEsNwSKnAPOpYqoTTF6LqX 1dhCdcJFv83I+LSwjT++/X5HDqHWV7gFgcp6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qG8fhGq8oU8tyx30hFyOZel2JCw1F0DRaB6KarF4UCCITlZrHGtEIsgA2wNuZo4dbJ oKVK0QBIQ6DeVU/NDIpolsugnlTmikaaKl+GR7UkVUdLXySL1muvx2odvl9V4xQMDoC+ xOrbW5FyWksQI5fueqnwJdO2HEUaVl+u7vdOo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.71.6 with SMTP id f6mr10710972vcj.16.1246513878067; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:51:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:51:18 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e8d216e8e9c2046db2a032 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485e8d216e8e9c2046db2a032 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here is the output of ssh -v localhost and the configuration of ssh_config, xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Next authentication method: password xxx@localhost's password: xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes #KerberosTicketCleanup yes # GSSAPI options #GSSAPIAuthentication no #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 PrintMotd no PrintLastLog yes TCPKeepAlive yes #UseLogin no #MaxStartups 10:30:60 #Banner /etc/issue.net # Allow client to pass locale environment variables AcceptEnv LANG LC_* Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server UsePAM yes On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to accept > publickey as a valid authorization mean. > > Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to the > following: > > debug1: Authentications that can continue: > publickey,password,keyboard-interactive > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity > debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa > debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa > debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 > debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA > debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). > > Cos > > > On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: > >> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't work. >> Thanks anyway >> >> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys >> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik> >wrote: >> >> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >>> >>> Cos >>> >>> >>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run on >>>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>>> >>>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>>> >>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>>> The key fingerprint is: >>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>>> >>>> >>>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>>> passphrase): >>>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >>>> paper. >>>> " >>>> >>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>>> no output >>>> >>>> $ ssh localhost >>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. >>>> RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. >>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>> >>>> --001485e8d216e8e9c2046db2a032-- From general-return-304-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 06:09:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98107 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 06:09:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 06:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 36396 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36314 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36304 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 06:10:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:09:58 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so854680vwj.5 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aJterOkRMMmKPRay8bi65WyiOhbEjd4dz2nNl3583XA=; b=x0hEiDcygINbH+KYuzKCCdPbxsBrNLQz7aRz25Z/aa5BA0C5uOHdkg6/i4q3PXhHzz /TPJOXHZBegss5RR4G9Kd2qe07qSuXzB0gG47zjPq22wjVut+sGk1DEwPNHbdS3R6C9l 6MLKmvoVcdNBEFmU3ygJVbH0su+FrXPaDIN9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CSovY1BHB3A+U8xwd8XsM0HHaPkI46wPysL40nwRpf4mfhjOc52+nRE1AhrkiGIP/t m9rLaHmOY5Jq8Hczt68dlq0qD64gx5yCyz85YiOdYmNHesS7R3Djkhi9UDfAZw8R3By1 tb98mADQk7UG9+Dcu3h/nuvKKDUpeBZOqn3pk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.72.79 with SMTP id l15mr8439952vcj.4.1246514977022; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:09:36 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64755aa69abfd046db2e2bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64755aa69abfd046db2e2bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit sorry, should incopy ssh_config(instead of sshd_config) vi /etc/ssh/ssh_config # 1. command line options # 2. user-specific file # 3. system-wide file # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the # configuration file, and defaults at the end. # Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. For a comprehensive # list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see the # ssh_config(5) man page. Host * # ForwardAgent no # ForwardX11 no # ForwardX11Trusted yes # RhostsRSAAuthentication no # RSAAuthentication yes # PasswordAuthentication yes # HostbasedAuthentication no # GSSAPIAuthentication no # GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no # GSSAPIKeyExchange no # GSSAPITrustDNS no # BatchMode no # CheckHostIP yes # AddressFamily any # ConnectTimeout 0 # StrictHostKeyChecking ask # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa # Port 22 # Protocol 2,1 # Cipher 3des # Ciphers aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc # MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160 # EscapeChar ~ # Tunnel no # TunnelDevice any:any # PermitLocalCommand no SendEnv LANG LC_* HashKnownHosts yes GSSAPIAuthentication yes GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, fred wang wrote: > Here is the output of ssh -v localhost and the configuration of > ssh_config, > > xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost > > OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 > > debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > > debug1: Applying options for * > > debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. > > debug1: Connection established. > > debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 > > debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 > > debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 > > debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.7p1 > Debian-8ubuntu1.2 > > debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* > > debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 > > debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received > > debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none > > debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent > > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent > > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY > > debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. > > debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 > > debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent > > debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent > > debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received > > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password > > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > > debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity > > debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa > > debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa > > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password > > debug1: Next authentication method: password > > xxx@localhost's password: > > > > > > > > xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config > > #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes > > #KerberosTicketCleanup yes > > > > # GSSAPI options > > #GSSAPIAuthentication no > > #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes > > > > X11Forwarding yes > > X11DisplayOffset 10 > > PrintMotd no > > PrintLastLog yes > > TCPKeepAlive yes > > #UseLogin no > > > > #MaxStartups 10:30:60 > > #Banner /etc/issue.net > > > > # Allow client to pass locale environment variables > > AcceptEnv LANG LC_* > > > > Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server > > > > UsePAM yes > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to accept >> publickey as a valid authorization mean. >> >> Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to the >> following: >> >> debug1: Authentications that can continue: >> publickey,password,keyboard-interactive >> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >> debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 >> debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA >> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). >> >> Cos >> >> >> On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: >> >>> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't >>> work. >>> Thanks anyway >>> >>> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys >>> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik>> >wrote: >>> >>> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >>>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run >>>>> on >>>>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>>>> >>>>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>>>> >>>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>>>> The key fingerprint is: >>>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>>>> passphrase): >>>>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >>>>> paper. >>>>> " >>>>> >>>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>>>> no output >>>>> >>>>> $ ssh localhost >>>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. >>>>> RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known >>>>> hosts. >>>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>>> >>>>> > --0016e64755aa69abfd046db2e2bd-- From general-return-305-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 06:24:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12818 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 06:24:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 06:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 51231 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:24:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51152 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:24:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51136 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 06:24:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:24:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:24:14 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1228882fgb.12 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:23:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.53.11 with SMTP id b11mr3136292fga.12.1246515834070; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:23:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:23:34 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Mailing lists are broken? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd251347f284f046db315a6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd251347f284f046db315a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That page is currently out of date. I believe the correct lists are {common,hdfs,mapred}-{user,dev,issues}@hadoop.apache.org Yes, that's 9 lists. There's also general@, and lists for the subprojects (Avro, Hive, Pig, HBase, Zookeeper, ...) -- Philip On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > Tried http://hadoop.apache.org/core/mailing_lists.html > Address "core-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org" returns error. > > Is that's OK? > > -- > Kind regards, BM > > Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > --000e0cd251347f284f046db315a6-- From general-return-306-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 07:04:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24455 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 07:04:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 07:04:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 95056 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95010 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95000 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 07:04:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:04:26 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so2092976yxe.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:04:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6xI3XVykTTZDSslk4QchAcxsED5m0wPvnB1Uv7T48nY=; b=O3yRVa5YrB8QaMjOL54zERP5AuUPHuiCcwO5v4RKq9wNPcMp22I8WG55yZbedrmMfe zbHKLCVo+dmf0S9bWOvPTaTnlZnXX/lMsHP9GF6WdpwSIinZQnF/s2WV1SpY1CH6cKCZ fjkOXgqxNuJDQeXakgurqEvnQ0gL4BW7T9AUw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rcW9lnJokTd85PLs5oNbruUP9QNRb3Ibf4QtLspQ0lKqDd5YzzaVTiTy0caZy6ejbS cmD7tsKbWYYWLaLwuRFvgRIa5viH6DXwZrEwP5gp8HNFHa6CiRgIpyoVMiJveE2EPSrM FfrzmYFdukch/fOZm9Lt6444K1DJStlWrjQHI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.136 with SMTP id t8mr3153643ibt.50.1246518244857; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:04:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: problem in sending you an email From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org, C J Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325574c1630d7a1046db3a594 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325574c1630d7a1046db3a594 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo guys, since yesterday I am trying to send you an email on core-user@hadoop.apache.org and I always got an error. Can someone give me valid email address? thank you, Christine --000325574c1630d7a1046db3a594-- From general-return-307-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 08:11:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46057 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 08:11:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 08:11:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 85832 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 08:11:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85773 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 08:11:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85763 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 08:11:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:11:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:11:44 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so1297078pxi.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:11:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hom68bU/HbatsLM5CO4TtIMKQdeeJ1omf0ATp1TdsMI=; b=DIf9ChapjCfSS7zhc9mgvUiCmTwKSSPb7YV3zhxsrMxoKj5WxgTeADBtWXABhETkix j1fQ+RDub0u5VIlHFiPC5dPFnsmlBESzGn4WyUVkvtgrifBaPqZJxGCELBMDRuSbyEIA nVafiqBvBChRDowwxnnAFBuXBfIND2rcNiTPE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K39nBmfepgJG1EmtK3m9BbvNgnzLOOxN8BUtvORgJkqBJQ2Us0PzzKIxP3D2Q61LgB AMxk6rPdle7M/pONPgBaP26g2kClwN4erzXbFLZpUpei1UP0fRlyLrUcXRTIOqBhv2U1 pJOLIVce3PMT9Q6h8r9AQPShfQD8Pi9e+Ni68= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.212.21 with SMTP id k21mr1443687wfg.109.1246522283567; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:11:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> References: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:11:23 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mailing lists are broken? From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: > That page is currently out of date. =C2=A0I believe the correct lists are > {common,hdfs,mapred}-{user,dev,issues}@hadoop.apache.org > > Yes, that's 9 lists. > > There's also general@, and lists for the subprojects (Avro, Hive, Pig, > HBase, Zookeeper, ...) Then in this case there must be two updates...: 1. Anyone please update mailing list page to let stop newcomers cross-post stuff around. 2. Wiki: I can confirm 0.20 works fine on OpenSolaris zones in a true cluster. :) ...and one question from newbie (me): By default Hadoop stores stuff in /tmp/.... directory that is "a base for other temporary directories.", however among that "other temporary" stuff I see my actual fsimage and VERSION file. Are they temporary? See, usually /tmp is just 1GB space on a separated partition and is volatile (e.g. system or node reboot simply wipes it out). Does that mean that Hadoop moves actual data blocks elsewhere or actually stores all the stuff actually in /tmp directory? For some reason, if I set like: hadoop.tmp.dir /export/storage/hadoop-data ...where I have lots of space per a node, somewhat Hadoop says capacity 0Kb. :-) When I put anything, it crashes with "File 10mb-random.dat could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1". 09/07/02 16:33:17 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Error Recovery for block null bad datanode[0] nodes =3D=3D null 09/07/02 16:33:17 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Could not get block locations. Source file "/10mb-random.dat" - Aborting... After I configure it back to "/tmp/anywhere-I-want", everything OK. Why it is like this? And how to make sure my data is not in a temporary place? --=20 Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-308-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 16:24:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84705 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 16:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 16:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92458 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:24:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92385 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92375 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 16:24:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:24:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.102.128] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c233.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.233]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n62GNiEa086934 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=y2ikerlSS44/2DWnuH4UbrdWRKJy3oT6Hl8/mLc0+Nu+N/Pv+I3J4qNcYDzBpiiU Message-ID: <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:23:43 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hmm, publickey seems to be allowed. Well, as the last resort, I'd suggest to make sure that your public key and the one in the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys are actually identical. On 7/1/09 11:09 PM, fred wang wrote: > sorry, should incopy ssh_config(instead of sshd_config) > > > vi /etc/ssh/ssh_config > > # 1. command line options > > # 2. user-specific file > > # 3. system-wide file > > # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. > > # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the > > # configuration file, and defaults at the end. > > > > # Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. For a comprehensive > > # list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see the > > # ssh_config(5) man page. > > > > Host * > > # ForwardAgent no > > # ForwardX11 no > > # ForwardX11Trusted yes > > # RhostsRSAAuthentication no > > # RSAAuthentication yes > > # PasswordAuthentication yes > > # HostbasedAuthentication no > > # GSSAPIAuthentication no > > # GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no > > # GSSAPIKeyExchange no > > # GSSAPITrustDNS no > > # BatchMode no > > # CheckHostIP yes > > # AddressFamily any > > # ConnectTimeout 0 > > # StrictHostKeyChecking ask > > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity > > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa > > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa > > # Port 22 > > # Protocol 2,1 > > # Cipher 3des > > # Ciphers > aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc > > # MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160 > > # EscapeChar ~ > > # Tunnel no > > # TunnelDevice any:any > > # PermitLocalCommand no > > SendEnv LANG LC_* > > HashKnownHosts yes > > GSSAPIAuthentication yes > > GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, fred wang wrote: > >> Here is the output of ssh -v localhost and the configuration of >> ssh_config, >> >> xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost >> >> OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 >> >> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config >> >> debug1: Applying options for * >> >> debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. >> >> debug1: Connection established. >> >> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 >> >> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 >> >> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 >> >> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.7p1 >> Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >> >> debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* >> >> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 >> >> debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received >> >> debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >> >> debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent >> >> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent >> >> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY >> >> debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. >> >> debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 >> >> debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent >> >> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent >> >> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received >> >> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >> >> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >> >> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >> >> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >> >> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >> >> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >> >> debug1: Next authentication method: password >> >> xxx@localhost's password: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config >> >> #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes >> >> #KerberosTicketCleanup yes >> >> >> >> # GSSAPI options >> >> #GSSAPIAuthentication no >> >> #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes >> >> >> >> X11Forwarding yes >> >> X11DisplayOffset 10 >> >> PrintMotd no >> >> PrintLastLog yes >> >> TCPKeepAlive yes >> >> #UseLogin no >> >> >> >> #MaxStartups 10:30:60 >> >> #Banner /etc/issue.net >> >> >> >> # Allow client to pass locale environment variables >> >> AcceptEnv LANG LC_* >> >> >> >> Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server >> >> >> >> UsePAM yes >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnikwrote: >> >>> Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to accept >>> publickey as a valid authorization mean. >>> >>> Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to the >>> following: >>> >>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: >>> publickey,password,keyboard-interactive >>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >>> debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 >>> debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA >>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). >>> >>> Cos >>> >>> >>> On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: >>> >>>> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't >>>> work. >>>> Thanks anyway >>>> >>>> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys >>>> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik>>>> wrote: >>>> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >>>>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run >>>>>> on >>>>>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>>>>> >>>>>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>>>>> >>>>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>>>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>>>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>>>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>>>>> The key fingerprint is: >>>>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>>>>> passphrase): >>>>>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >>>>>> paper. >>>>>> " >>>>>> >>>>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>>>>> no output >>>>>> >>>>>> $ ssh localhost >>>>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. >>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known >>>>>> hosts. >>>>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>>>> >>>>>> From general-return-309-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 16:58:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6804 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 16:58:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 16:58:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 66177 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66137 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 16:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66127 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 16:58:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:58:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:58:31 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so668965wfg.2 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:58:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PSFJkmzkrozMqWlRhYjR/9ZH1XaOdHhryZjDowcKwHE=; b=YYdIcaq3Axao4BOr9FAqKJzinr7k3QeFjJK2jFM2DXIM5PEVGOdQdv4xiQWYoD9GFx sCILNVKe35G1iEq7bC7UK//TLsOkp9n8yRGehm5A6S8p835L//Z0Ic+ZNF3nMIzpzEeT TRKXIMl3uEonoNWlSYqfRKGeRz+0NE30U7FvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tXTODeDeRi4LzrfxK+I9AIgV3qg9O1933sX3TWJu5vMaV8jA8A+Qg3HXKNJems+CGQ NL7vdOGuPpMuQ/hjVKmzao9FQnmuTsk9k5/EraQnpGO8iCb+wmh5j6XVGNz9q/mrEcxQ QMar5/littyuhybR4n1seXZ02QuQWFBiibt9Y= Received: by 10.142.173.6 with SMTP id v6mr160124wfe.40.1246553890159; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm7244955wfd.3.2009.07.02.09.58.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4CE71F.7000302@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:58:07 -0700 From: Doug Cutting Reply-To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.0.0 (candidate 0)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Can folks please download and test this Avro release candidate? Votes should be cast on avro-dev@. Thanks, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.0.0 (candidate 0) Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:11:22 -0700 From: Doug Cutting To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a candidate build for Avro release 1.0.0. This would be the first public release of Avro. We hope not to change Avro's specification incompatibly until release 2.0.0, so its adequacy is more important than bugs or features for this release. Please download, test and vote by 7 July. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.0.0-candidate-0/ Thanks, Doug From general-return-310-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:06:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9371 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:06:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 73872 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73747 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73723 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:06:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:06:49 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.64] (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-64.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n62H6ShC039809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A4CE913.4000900@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:06:27 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.0 (candidate 1)] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010808050307060802090503" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------010808050307060802090503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop PMC, Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. Thanks, Patrick --------------010808050307060802090503 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.0 (candidate 1).eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.0 (candidate 1).eml" Delivered-To: phunt1@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.6.1 with SMTP id 1cs224329anf; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.27.7 with SMTP id e7mr926673rvj.257.1246470038602; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from minotaur.apache.org (minotaur.apache.org [140.211.11.9]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 41si340542pzk.125.2009.07.01.10.40.38; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of phunt@apache.org designates 140.211.11.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.11.9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of phunt@apache.org designates 140.211.11.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phunt@apache.org Received: (qmail 52978 invoked by uid 2923); 1 Jul 2009 17:40:27 -0000 Delivered-To: phunt@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52973 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 17:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 17:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 45246 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-phunt@apache.org Received: (qmail 45241 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 17:40:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:40:28 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.187] (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-187.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.187]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n61HdsJr048210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A4B9F69.4040401@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:39:53 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.0 (candidate 1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.0. Over 120 JIRAs are addressed in this release, with major new features for; perl/python/rest bindings, flexible quorum support, recipe code libraries, chroot support in connect string, and much more. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Monday, July 6.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.2.0-candidate-1/ Should we release this? Patrick --------------010808050307060802090503-- From general-return-311-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:22:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17924 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:22:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:22:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 92881 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:22:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92801 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92791 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:22:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [131.107.115.215] (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) (131.107.115.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:22:20 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:21:59 -0700 Received: from TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.9.116]) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:21:58 -0700 From: "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: Mailing lists are broken? Thread-Topic: Mailing lists are broken? Thread-Index: AQHJ+rlILs2d7A2/8EGuHI/1+O8rypBiOyYAgABBnqA= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:21:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tried to subscribe to the mapred-dev list and got: > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at minotaur.apache.org. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following address= es. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > : > 192.87.106.230 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 mail to mapred-dev-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org not = accepted here Giving up on 192.87.106.230. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: > Received: (qmail 9141 invoked by uid 2660); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 > Date: 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 > Message-ID: <20090702170600.9138.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> > From: jimk@apache.org > To: mapred-dev-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org I got a similar failure when trying to subscribe to mapred-issues From general-return-312-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:25:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22794 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:25:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:25:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 98967 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:25:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98909 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98899 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:25:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:25:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.236] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:25:09 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so608617rvb.29 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=7jg6gXzL8FG58brafvxc0Z+yNJ33HOVjkt0b3C4hOi8=; b=AMmznkz1aNylt2A/yDPf+s47HgJz9y8NrM4qjKAo58gQKMu5r3YRJMSxDFiwfX9Dwd Z/vq9JDVRKJJl/QaIV/r5EoyQlMW7vDCsDcFNRCJZfeluUuRBK+Cjswbv8d/XlMWlb8Y pn9WPg5FAI/L8LFsK0/35XnpTXatTlpi1kQcc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date :references; b=Iz+bSfIl+bFOssFC8BfbXGaq6spIC+K8pWTLaSpsxexmL7SQJa+/Zfv0dR045YzzTD QaqhfY6+kiZzckb8i6iXprrErbU4oY+KSjsxUvQSU4RvJjBDn+FSDPhrtCFFgb2rTwvM JrtADhAcAMvyitrWFgCmkil9TLn719KaUW9m8= Received: by 10.141.1.19 with SMTP id d19mr393665rvi.145.1246555489271; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.21.202.57? (lo5.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.144]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k37sm12013597rvb.28.2009.07.02.10.24.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <1357BE36-A3A7-4131-B721-8D9EEEEFA31B@gmail.com> From: Owen O'Malley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A341) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A341) Subject: Re: Mailing lists are broken? Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:24:03 -0700 References: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is mapreduce-dev... -- Owen On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:21, "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" wrote: > I tried to subscribe to the mapred-dev list and got: > >> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at minotaur.apache.org. >> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following >> addresses. >> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >> >> : >> 192.87.106.230 does not like recipient. >> Remote host said: 550 mail to mapred-dev- >> subscribe@hadoop.apache.org not accepted here Giving up on 192.87.106.230 >> . >> >> --- Below this line is a copy of the message. >> >> Return-Path: >> Received: (qmail 9141 invoked by uid 2660); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 >> Date: 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 >> Message-ID: <20090702170600.9138.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> >> From: jimk@apache.org >> To: mapred-dev-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org > > I got a similar failure when trying to subscribe to mapred-issues > From general-return-313-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 20:47:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35291 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 20:47:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 20:47:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 54349 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54305 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54295 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 20:47:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:47:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:47:34 +0000 Received: from pineapple-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pineapple-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.122.24]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n62Kjuuw091054 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=SeytO+eSfR3OvJnLI8Asckqzc8rM7OJaKjGvhAoB5mfImNZu4WHMLol+jxGRx7Eq Message-Id: <82F6C99C-17FD-4B38-A397-461043998B65@yahoo-inc.com> From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Mailing lists are broken? Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:45:56 -0700 References: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's mapreduce-dev@ -C On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) wrote: > I tried to subscribe to the mapred-dev list and got: > >> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at minotaur.apache.org. >> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following >> addresses. >> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. >> >> : >> 192.87.106.230 does not like recipient. >> Remote host said: 550 mail to mapred-dev- >> subscribe@hadoop.apache.org not accepted here Giving up on >> 192.87.106.230. >> >> --- Below this line is a copy of the message. >> >> Return-Path: >> Received: (qmail 9141 invoked by uid 2660); 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 >> Date: 2 Jul 2009 17:06:00 -0000 >> Message-ID: <20090702170600.9138.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> >> From: jimk@apache.org >> To: mapred-dev-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org > > I got a similar failure when trying to subscribe to mapred-issues > From general-return-314-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 21:04:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41053 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 21:04:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 21:04:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 80219 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:04:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80166 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:04:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80100 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 21:04:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:04:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:04:49 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so673693fge.12 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:04:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.74.4 with SMTP id w4mr674196fga.65.1246568669613; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:04:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> References: <15da8a100907012323w49fe44f8rfb45fe43a7deac47@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:04:09 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100907021404g31f764f2x6e7445fc0a9db640@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Mailing lists are broken? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As others pointed out, it's actually "mapreduce", and I also left off the -commits. So, it's really: {common,hdfs,mapreduce}-{user,dev,issues,commits}@hadoop.apache.org -- Philip From general-return-315-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 23:37:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3401 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 23:37:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 23:37:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 22549 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:38:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22484 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:38:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22474 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 23:38:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:38:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:37:50 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so743384wfg.2 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:37:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QXoX9cPhYo0Yg8vzrAqHh1oHdFroOoIMkA2+LJ/0MMg=; b=iqdbemu5Z1/xsdSl2XHnInZC8DrsC8hr01CGH+0gaP2xmkCOggXEa5nc5/A9EPa7Hx 2bZ1eCrkr6EVMQ18i3v1JuTStZRFnc9EbbGnz+kn/XtY1Pyp/OV7ZcxDXK2FhVDQ9gr5 FSj01c/GB0F169067vEi81mNjzgmfamW1/Dxw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r8PT8b+wR5TtnI/FqUtduWeIUB8UJ2/6UqH/Ui72f2jYcA4vIfCsnSOKqlpNQ/3wr4 zl9z3/v1m4DG1PJrdjRZYBHjqx/731s0/VmnlncvpjL/dpDI4CyRlCH65BM1WAHO3m8d 7BUsl64sO3ghSezpvXdO6biHBZsR5rhNCy5uY= Received: by 10.142.231.7 with SMTP id d7mr270126wfh.99.1246577849034; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm8410197wfd.4.2009.07.02.16.37.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4D44B5.2060602@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:37:25 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce References: <4A4BB103.30906@apache.org> <361DBFD2-DF1C-4719-9F35-B94D974ECEC1@yahoo-inc.com> <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A4BB771.60605@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > Arun C Murthy wrote: >> -1 from me. > > You subscribe to both lists and really prefer receiving create/resolve > messages twice? Arun? I'm trying to decide whether I must add a filter to automatically delete the second copy of these messages, or whether we can eliminate the second copy. Do you really subscribe to both lists and prefer receiving both copies? Doug From general-return-316-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 04:44:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4399 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 04:44:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 04:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 91964 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 04:44:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91875 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 04:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91861 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 04:44:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:44:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qiaomuf@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:44:46 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so920615qyk.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=osRZg9mtIGUOWFXwFpqQbd7SCKINkTAP1tkzetr2sMk=; b=KM/aJNrzvTQhKUYHdi0R5IVIjLp6MABP34aWBqVxBPL3gIA4M3d6zYTEqh3rdrf/h3 J5KEV8TNfTTg5Hh1SSnyGGIeHauUZsX+150IxZ5dznPiTAz1oOYcqDdcfg20Vj7J0Nzz D4oQ1SeC4Aq6qXta57lL0yrvqhQefUQV9Zci4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=uUFc5ZrYiPVRJcwkX+Xv6ttrffzKzCB9VBntT+uNfdql1EFIhUA+ptJ9ONmo89Ayev UDMawKa3jgjEF1O6Wa/eFgK3QinCwkOGBzUbzF/d50CwpFWF5ZWBxca+8qwjTbyem9jr f60Zu71GFH5S0d0HM4XkUGLQlY/NQ+nltJCIs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.132 with SMTP id o4mr860020qcl.0.1246596265118; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:44:25 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?B?5LmU5pyo?= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:44:05 -0700 Message-ID: <396ceda90907022144p3b66a345g1b3b52a1ac5b7969@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Combiner Problem To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364edc328f8e3a046dc5cf22 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364edc328f8e3a046dc5cf22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, everyone I've been learning hadoop recently and I'm confused about the combiner mechanism. There is a property min.num.spills.for.combine specifying the minimum numbe= r of spills to run combiner when merging. The default value is 3. Why there i= s such a restriction? Should it be better that run the combiner no matter how many spills there are? The second question is why the combiner could be run at the reduce side. Can't the reduce function take place of that? Thanks very much. --=20 Best wishes, =E4=B9=94=E6=9C=A8 MOE KLINNS Lab and SKLMS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University Department of Computer Science and Technology, Xi=E2=80=99an Jiaotong Unive= rsity TEL: 15991676983 E-mail: qiaomuf@gmail.com --0016364edc328f8e3a046dc5cf22-- From general-return-317-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 04:50:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5502 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 04:50:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 04:50:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 94006 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 04:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93914 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 04:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93903 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 04:51:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:50:57 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so923038qyk.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:50:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YKNPw7wVQJghKygMBxUv1z/GiienyaCu0K9g1WuIE0k=; b=FmQPDNd3f5xgyv0C4m09znVKpSIVgAGp9E9rqJPAMjNbwLS1UouptGQMMhgiCHqU+T /9CmCdFiLa18wufQLjkKSyCKvF7tYL/KQbt04tbI9U1cw3DZTv8qqcVGrkNNM/yC7M9R YvDKPaEqJrQ6yonYW2gItVid/Q6Oj782LBus4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lqKnnnNESO2PK/avwZcA+xT02uNa9f8mE7gAtJDiWxf3L1uJ/xpJrEsSSBArigTKF9 uKgX0GlKOhW16k+yLdDOIeqJMvBSWAmc1j+4hmTEKQiCmQybVKciR4aNbf06TqBy3aNr Ds7dZ6gUkh2Ur75IfZRObkAHfR3mCW2SGGjfg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cutting@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.74.212 with SMTP id v20mr848020qcj.16.1246596636985; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:50:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1c9416210907022147u3ef8e942see605339a9f618a6@mail.gmail.com> References: <1c9416210907022147u3ef8e942see605339a9f618a6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:50:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d09e00f32b5fecb7 Message-ID: <1c9416210907022150g2d42f186q7d3f7db49826b984@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.0.0 (candidate 1) From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Can folks please download and test this new Avro release candidate? Votes should be cast on avro-dev@. Thanks, Doug ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Doug Cutting Date: Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:47 PM Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.0.0 (candidate 1) To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a second candidate build for Avro release 1.0.0. Mostly this adds missing license headers and notices. Please download, test and vote by 7 July. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.0.0-candidate-1/ Thanks! Doug From general-return-318-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 08:41:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85440 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 08:41:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 08:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 88115 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88068 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88002 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 08:41:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:41:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:41:04 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so946212yxe.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:40:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=qDTZpi+iMceEyyT78cQ/AO+5WQ0KWnb7xwHOrP+w1Dw=; b=ohu9mUn6quRBX296adKL/fEYyiydznVgiCGeTMJc8Ya/DkIfQrJB7ebCK9auuII0OV vONbkOH0hjOoIPxsFPmY+xZrxkf7+eSc90l9Z5tiy0mjvYM+uE2ZHjX3fxEItV2LqAIv d0k1rmz1vUsSeHr+33HjPkiqrNUkXX0V8ynHE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZudZjAi2PJx+o6BNXzX2FZZ3yW5mh975HAk28M5kN3WHnANI6jvV1LMg2F1EjWfJr1 a4qJ4FRpFeQTcufBa/+wqNGfxj51yByrQ1AW0ZLTq/5usjkLddFXQQ/GG3VrluypysKq mkLddbuR1SJU/NQzC6zU0A2+Hgi9iw8EV4COU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.14.67 with SMTP id f3mr1008553iba.36.1246610443457; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:40:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: problem in sending you an email From: C J To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, C J , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532cc80a7d3ee046dc91c32 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221532cc80a7d3ee046dc91c32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hallo, everytime I try sending you and email explaining my problem in Haddop the email does not reach you and I get the following error *Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 spam score (23.5) exceeded threshold (state 18). *I hope at least you receive this email and tell me the reason of the error, is it the length of the email? format? Thank you for your help --00221532cc80a7d3ee046dc91c32-- From general-return-319-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 08:46:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87113 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 08:46:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 08:46:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 99257 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99189 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:47:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99178 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 08:47:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:47:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:46:58 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2634938ewy.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=913X1WhOV6Jekn51lZImo4PLxjXnb/s6eLku+SbVrCw=; b=FdHy2CInW9Wrz7/fSsR5WstFTgWQnAlO3PAkpoRSXYtSN0KEPVGHOCWwSB8iRbEKWW n/HON/Ppq/6+nIphN2NVAzH1HF7ccBeCXLnY5c8cHkslfqvtq0OSfJ2JRrFU5xfpjrfE xAai03RkK3xh2yC1/v5KBCXNuJsFz8j87gS3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H7W4A4eNxijZjFa8tkpNFG1zWlmlsj8FPinr/LqxWFivnTa7phkqwrXM3PL/cNdZNA bhGoLHYwxFKabgL4LDe/lwGTgRsRkuheyV81Lls9ffg4iJV7v5UYiz4j3/oNQbDR/0Ne Pf6QUhE2A8xVOOUyRbY8zYSebLDXsYUTApkzI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.46.79 with SMTP id q57mr296005web.62.1246610797487; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:46:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:46:37 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907030146p3ec08b55re05c1cc5cfa58978@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem in sending you an email From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi CJ, Your recent emails are getting through, but I don't have your original question anymore. When I post a question to the list, I don't see my own question in GMail until someone answers it - presumably the listserv does not send you back your own question on first post. Perhaps you could post your question again and hopefully someone will answer it. I suggest creating a new subject so the conversation becomes a new thread. Cheers, Tim On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM, C J wrote: > hallo, everytime I try sending you and email explaining my problem > in Haddop the email does not reach you and I get the following error > > *Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient > domain. > We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information > about the cause of this error. > The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 spam score (23.5) > exceeded threshold (state 18). > > *I hope at least you receive this email and tell me the reason of the error, > is it the length of the email? format? > > Thank you for your help > From general-return-320-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:04:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91808 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:04:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:04:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 18582 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:04:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18549 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18539 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:04:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:04:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.132.244 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.244] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:04:14 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so1017990ana.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:03:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/ssLxJO7fK+2z3xqHV43Lri5tI7AnZtv0KVF5IsKpM4=; b=BrG9liwwmD43NU1E0QdVvy09KEnuEBRdc6ipFWoRYj+gHr6s3qj6ND7z/0yBf0t2xA pYNnws8i6QOKtU+6wjhoBO8zauSJ/VBPjLOvIi0Xf0qGzkNdTjrkLNfov1ll/WLNs6Jp kfHuHy+V7Y9zdUTrvCIOWSmMH5Mz+mPbPWlZk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=X6fH57ycRfSmEGlCM8XQqH37X/lSVqyU7CycuinlrS15AD37u3qza8eZL3TL+yjplN 5amLM0Ipibs838Uu7CFwk/uSvPrAOVt0gkyF1b6gYkaWwj16wqgcwHfeEyG05OPpMNGi h0AIiZHZz21UbJbcYvHGTb+9eLMidQf2zfsXU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.14.138 with SMTP id g10mr1029082iba.10.1246611832978; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:03:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030146p3ec08b55re05c1cc5cfa58978@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030146p3ec08b55re05c1cc5cfa58978@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:03:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem in sending you an email From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532cbc47a3e3e046dc96f5d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221532cbc47a3e3e046dc96f5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok thank you, I will do right now On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, tim robertson wrote: > Hi CJ, > > Your recent emails are getting through, but I don't have your original > question anymore. When I post a question to the list, I don't see my > own question in GMail until someone answers it - presumably the > listserv does not send you back your own question on first post. > > Perhaps you could post your question again and hopefully someone will > answer it. I suggest creating a new subject so the conversation > becomes a new thread. > > Cheers, > > Tim > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:40 AM, C J wrote: > > hallo, everytime I try sending you and email explaining my problem > > in Haddop the email does not reach you and I get the following error > > > > *Technical details of permanent failure: > > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient > > domain. > > We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information > > about the cause of this error. > > The error that the other server returned was: 552 552 spam score (23.5) > > exceeded threshold (state 18). > > > > *I hope at least you receive this email and tell me the reason of the > error, > > is it the length of the email? format? > > > > Thank you for your help > > > --00221532cbc47a3e3e046dc96f5d-- From general-return-321-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:06:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92525 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:06:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:06:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25448 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:07:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25377 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:07:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25367 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:07:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:07:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:06:57 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2645537ewy.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0NcHNzU5wwm9CykGgjJQw1UyvE2nXON5rlxaAlhgltA=; b=l4AHJ2AH4PBIh/0wuOpaqs2ClHp/rK+c2dkjlKS4MaTmC5wrYKKX/EFiwBnDUaVei1 QWSMbdpx7BXd67A+bjWbqhOOg6LhMkSdlqE1YHmovtyAz7t/uHIzEj8LgV+a+WxawLm4 0SlO8HG+/Uwmuzv0zW1m+3ZgO8/jwc2OTcPd4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IBqxVu9ClVa8Nn8wllMHnDeFy5KbJWxLwuO2CaHSNlMtG6VNkPu61EiHR4DVevQh4v +OktwLLbOtC8tbt8hjMCgDf9rMISjHmZ5JdizZtVoLOCg3vqSGr9vWKZzaFTvTrxqUzR 7RF9scOewR9NHsPArqOjQjQxkWzZQAP+W560M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.137 with SMTP id 9mr292890wex.180.1246611996410; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:06:36 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Tools to help administer a cluster? From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, Can someone please point me at an open source tool that can help with management of a *nix cluster? I am looking for something that allows easy ability to copy over a new Hadoop distribution and sync all the config files etc. I'm not very good at system admin, so hoping there is are some tools to help speed things up. I am running on a small cluster using Mac OSX right now, but will want to use the same on a Linux distribution with 16 nodes shortly. Cheers, Tim From general-return-322-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:21:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97209 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:21:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 44901 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:21:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44820 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44802 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:21:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:21:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.132.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.240] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:21:39 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so1020478ana.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:21:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=O6mZ+tL3AfASDUJ8nnpT4aIZhn62Tumj+LFv1A7arI4=; b=KzKSMs5BjzAWcntiDdHfUjzNpPIkcCmFdVeyq26H4u6AOiZ1pHeOVOfg2hysModoa0 793/rbiEBh3WfT6yCZF+GEn6+6BqycL40ZVT3D2AcuF6Sc1fgoe9xcT3z/LKcEHHCnMp 3YXIb2gs+pTL8cb7cYl3UCMaxuCGmGUPUrgOw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jlSZOd9K0hfHcTvU1LxlXxXdmPzWnQhv0fyEeRDisrVSZl8pVzSwJhkNciN4AyR86E Z3FVvz1S0+5LvcRm3lmTUr2IF/p/MXsXJqN6njzBVkHa3/dRexJimoQmoLoyb7XXi/rX Xipspu5aWjTdxYbpopkYnlW7gAa7Qi2eOb2gs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.11 with SMTP id a11mr1027993ibd.38.1246612875897; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:21:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: My secondary namenode seem not be running, and may be the reason of my problem!!! From: C J To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, C J , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d6d75a3ede0046dc9ad60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d6d75a3ede0046dc9ad60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo everyone, I have installed the hadoop 0.18.3 on three linux machines, I am trying to run the example of WordCountv1.0 on a cluster. But I guess I have a problem somewhere. * Problem* *After formating the name node:* I am getting several STARTUP_MSG and at the end a "SHUTDOWN_MSG: shutting down the namenode..." is this normal? *Afterwards I try starting the dfs:** *I get a message "starting namenode..."* *afterwards I get another message "starting secondary namenode" at this stage the shell is blocked unless I press the enter key. Then the system tries to start another secondary namenode and the shell is then not blocked. What is going on? * Then I proceed an try starting the mapred:* I get the two messages "starting jobtracker....." and "starting tasktracker" *Following the tutorial for runnin WordCode v1.0, If I try to list the files in the input folder I have created *I get the famous error "Retrying connect to server:134.130.222.20:9000" .what am I doing something wrong? *Steps I have already verified* *I have already checked the iptables of the three machines and they look**: ** *Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destiantion Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination * My hadoop-site.xml file looks like this * configuration> fs.default.name 134.130.222.20:9000/ mapred.job.tracker 134.130.222.18:9001 ........ *Can someone help me out?* *Thank you, CJ* --0022152d6d75a3ede0046dc9ad60-- From general-return-323-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:22:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97682 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:22:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:22:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 48794 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:22:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48718 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:22:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48708 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:22:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:22:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com designates 167.1.158.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [167.1.158.29] (HELO cvgmx2.convergys.com) (167.1.158.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:22:27 +0000 Received: from CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com (CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com [155.90.28.181]) by cvgmx2.convergys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC9C154909E for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:20:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.3 September 14, 2004 Message-ID: From: anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:51:59 +0530 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/03/2009 02:51:59 PM, Serialize by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/03/2009 02:51:59 PM, Serialize complete at 07/03/2009 02:51:59 PM, S/MIME Sign failed at 07/03/2009 02:51:59 PM: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 6.5.5FP3|March 22, 2007) at 07/03/2009 05:22:33 AM, Serialize complete at 07/03/2009 05:22:33 AM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0033737F652575E8_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0033737F652575E8_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" If you only need to copy files around to multiple hosts, you can use rsync utility to do that. you can write a shell script to do the following 1. zip the delta distribution preserving the directory structure 2. rsync the zip to a predefined location on all nodes 3. ssh to each of your nodes one after the other 4. execute the unzip and copy overf your hadoop delta distribution on remote machines You can try the above steps on your current host to stage/rehearse your installation before you actually do it so that you can verify if things are ok. hope it helps or was i completely unhelpful:)? -a.r.h tim robertson 07/03/2009 02:36 PM Please respond to general@hadoop.apache.org To general@hadoop.apache.org cc Subject Tools to help administer a cluster? Hi all, Can someone please point me at an open source tool that can help with management of a *nix cluster? I am looking for something that allows easy ability to copy over a new Hadoop distribution and sync all the config files etc. I'm not very good at system admin, so hoping there is are some tools to help speed things up. I am running on a small cluster using Mac OSX right now, but will want to use the same on a Linux distribution with 16 nodes shortly. Cheers, Tim --=_alternative 0033737F652575E8_=-- From general-return-324-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:23:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98136 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:23:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:23:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 50163 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50092 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:23:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50082 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:23:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:23:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com designates 167.1.158.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [167.1.158.29] (HELO cvgmx2.convergys.com) (167.1.158.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:23:43 +0000 Received: from CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com (CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com [155.90.28.181]) by cvgmx2.convergys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DE71549051 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:21:38 +0000 (UTC) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: how big in size is a hadoop distribution MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.3 September 14, 2004 Message-ID: From: anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:53:15 +0530 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/03/2009 02:53:15 PM, Serialize by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/03/2009 02:53:15 PM, Serialize complete at 07/03/2009 02:53:15 PM, S/MIME Sign failed at 07/03/2009 02:53:15 PM: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 6.5.5FP3|March 22, 2007) at 07/03/2009 05:23:51 AM, Serialize complete at 07/03/2009 05:23:51 AM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0033912E652575E8_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0033912E652575E8_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" How big is a typical hadoop distribution in megabytes and how is typically upgraded? --=_alternative 0033912E652575E8_=-- From general-return-325-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:27:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99963 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:27:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:27:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 54737 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54672 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54662 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:27:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:26:59 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2656486ewy.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:26:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5VVDRacZmClJeWm7dbk77OrFCZl/e5IkrzGERUwOS0c=; b=d+yvNblGhN+8hUH+Jym2IXFUlh8i0yMzEcQ2TZMBlQUM+rxv1Qh0CrMludspknZF61 xZsjN/AJzsAKgJM/XE4kYacl7vTXDaO8Hijh7fTfE8XdY0Eq5f2C5jJhGk0isP06Hz2k Uayzc/9Q8Cn0SHTiiMMKw07X0rH/3F0PHn6kU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=u+lL9Lm/qOLefb9m/5MCHjYD/Eiu1cVQjzAg0fMXbkqJ6dGm8ahP9HYtic+QxBEh5t rt2mNDI8g7f/fUdoLJL/OI0gpiFEDLkBf+RW6WgB98o8EAKsohJM6dEp9hQR5LdCNiWJ XZfn25SdhFHWYaz5FcU6ozY7QJ4+OrNC1mhXo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.8.78 with SMTP id 56mr280929weq.210.1246613198489; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:26:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:26:38 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907030226m28d6bfc9w1b6af48f8db42347@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: My secondary namenode seem not be running, and may be the reason of my problem!!! From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org "at this stage the shell is blocked unless I press the enter key" - my cluster did this until I realised passphraseless ssh was not working between the master and the nodes and the master to itself. http://fak3r.com/2006/08/10/howto-passwordless-ssh-logins/ Cheers, Tim On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, C J wrote: > Hallo everyone, > I have installed the hadoop 0.18.3 on three linux machines, I am trying t= o > run the > example of WordCountv1.0 on a cluster. But I guess I have a problem > somewhere. > * > Problem* > > *After formating the name node:* > I am getting several STARTUP_MSG and at the end a "SHUTDOWN_MSG: shutting > down the namenode..." > is this normal? > > *Afterwards I try starting the dfs:** > *I get a message "starting namenode..."* *afterwards I get another messag= e > "starting secondary namenode" > at this stage the shell is blocked unless I press the enter key. Then the > system tries to start another secondary > namenode and the shell is then not blocked. What is going on? > * > Then I proceed an try starting the mapred:* > I get the two messages "starting jobtracker....." and "starting tasktrack= er" > > *Following the tutorial for runnin WordCode v1.0, If I try to list the fi= les > in the input folder I have created > *I get the famous error "Retrying connect to server:134.130.222.20:9000" > .what am I doing something wrong? > > > *Steps I have already verified* > > *I have already checked the iptables of the three machines and they look*= *: > ** > *Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 prot opt source destiantion > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) > target =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 prot opt source destination > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) > target =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0prot opt source destination > > * > My hadoop-site.xml file looks like this > * configuration> > =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0fs.default.name > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0134.130.222.20:9000/ > =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0mapred.job.tracker > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0134.130.222.18:9001 > =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0........ > > > *Can someone help me out?* > *Thank you, CJ* > From general-return-326-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 12:09:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72256 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 12:09:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 12:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 61952 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 12:09:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61901 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 12:09:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61891 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 12:09:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:09:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:09:09 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so2130284pzk.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IfCzYwdjjHCHvI7z/Cjac+oH8MDhuPGP3stqGsAFf+4=; b=baZSG2L2O5Yrnk9+s0eOg/w02EvSpmNn8U2P5KnJSLcWc/TzSfYc2sybDtui2bdJvw oA5Z6/0hF1IBTl1TduO3e24eqtYk+s23OEwG3T52HZTewLQGUxKJKAhhIzpeTdLCcj9b yNQyIHffe1T8rzxEB9GJtgEW1S7uvUklLyu4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x+1lhBhhPi4qJvtgcoZMLEs/71KgJtntXZWQ0JZol/+KN3FisA70nNkNsoyj74m45O FWzYZXh7/ImQ/Ij9GDeH0g8RqIQMAivkmfQVyCkPBewnDTeZzBOewiMl/1Lwob6VONPG qoYx2XuVeWSAFyWvpUDrh1fwpe5SRxizMWkxM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.173.6 with SMTP id v6mr473122wfe.233.1246622929212; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 21:08:49 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, tim robertson wr= ote: > I am looking for something that allows easy ability to copy over a new > Hadoop distribution and sync all the config files etc. =C2=A0I'm not very > good at system admin, so hoping there is are some tools to help speed > things up. HINT: Password-less here SSH is not just because Doug wanted so. :) /bin/bash with SSH/scp are your very opensource friends, e.g.: for hostname in `cat $HADOOP/slaves`; do echo "Doing stuff on $hostname"; scp /local/file.txt $hostname:/path/on/remote/host/; ssh $hostname cat /path/on/remote/host/file.txt; done P.S. Make sure "slaves" does not contains local host's IP. :-) --=20 HTH, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-327-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 12:17:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76478 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 12:17:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 12:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 78450 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 12:17:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78394 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 12:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78384 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 12:17:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:17:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.132.250 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.250] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.250) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:17:44 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so1049353ana.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=icsHwZPeLCOJaBYN/j44rHikUu0g4fsaLvaJRLwgy4c=; b=D5yV5+XU5aWZ0MuEzSTi52vs+a6avnjlFydn3sohRKJ/BdYIYjHru9zPqWzHXdehwl 91cWtN3pR7KJAksxHlSypHSPQXBAXVWtoUnugMufDrpjHHUQVhyQuV617AGTmiJX3ZpJ JOcafN9sS1DRCKlnxvKHHzNTVKJSdmYgXI0wo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kgn3mZY2aHx2RByfONNNK9ukr8KVB0vQOZ9Y9qjYSSxzFZjz3qJiLQvIUNgPxPoxpP pv1ryImhgplQHCjanun6dUaNUqvTQ+R0e2ucbbnFycRAlKUFth1xyfY7f+yLsypn/b9U revXt+iA2WmqjxRnQ9GjQ60mX+84CMdercVio= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.16.138 with SMTP id o10mr1074016iba.13.1246623440327; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030226m28d6bfc9w1b6af48f8db42347@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030226m28d6bfc9w1b6af48f8db42347@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:17:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: My secondary namenode seem not be running, and may be the reason of my problem!!! From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325574d2a545725046dcc2354 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325574d2a545725046dcc2354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *Hallo Tim, and everyone, I have fixed the passphraseless, now each of the three machines can ssh the others without a password. thanks to you I guess I moved one step forward now the output of my shell is the following:* *My current status **when starting the dfs* alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # bin/start-dfs.sh starting namenode, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-namenode-alshain.out 134.130.222.17: starting datanode, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-datanode-adhil.out 134.130.222.20: starting secondarynamenode, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-secondarynamenode-alshain.out 134.130.222.18: starting secondarynamenode, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-secondarynamenode-albali.out *when starting the mapred* alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # bin/start-mapred.sh starting jobtracker, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-jobtracker-alshain.out 1 34.130.222.17: starting tasktracker, logging to /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logs/hadoop-root-tasktracker-adhil.out *Problem-1* *when trying to list the content of the input folder* alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # bin/hadoop dfs -ls usr/tina/wordcount/input 09/07/03 14:00:21 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/127.0.0.2:14000. Already tried 0 time(s). 09/07/03 14:00:22 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/127.0.0.2:14000. Already tried 1 time(s). 09/07/03 14:00:23 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/127.0.0.2:14000. Already tried 2 time(s). 09/07/03 14:00:24 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/127.0.0.2:14000. Already tried 3 time(s). 09/07/03 14:00:25 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/127.0.0.2:14000. Already tried 4 time(s). *Problem 2 ** *alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # bin/stop-dfs.sh no namenode to stop 134.130.222.17: stopping datanode 134.130.222.20: stopping secondarynamenode 134.130.222.18: stopping secondarynamenode alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # bin/stop-mapred.sh no jobtracker to stop 134.130.222.17: stopping tasktracker This looks as if the namenode and the jobtracker were never started? any idea why *What I have checked tried to ping the namenode using its name, it is successfull from any machine *alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # ping alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de PING alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de (127.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de (127.0.0.2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.011 ms 64 bytes from alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de (127.0.0.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.010 ms 64 bytes from alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de (127.0.0.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.009 ms --- alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 1998ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.009/0.010/0.011/0.000 ms *tried to ping the namenode using its ip address, it is successful from any machine *alshain:~/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3 # ping 134.130.222.20 PING 134.130.222.20 (134.130.222.20) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 134.130.222.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms 64 bytes from 134.130.222.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.009 ms 64 bytes from 134.130.222.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.008 ms 64 bytes from 134.130.222.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.009 ms 64 bytes from 134.130.222.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.010 ms --- 134.130.222.20 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.008/0.014/0.038/0.012 ms *Can anyone tell me why the namenode and the jobtracker were never started? I appreciate your help, CJ * On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tim robertson wrote: > "at this stage the shell is blocked unless I press the enter key" - my > cluster did this until I realised passphraseless ssh was not working > between the master and the nodes and the master to itself. > http://fak3r.com/2006/08/10/howto-passwordless-ssh-logins/ > > Cheers, > > Tim > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, C J wrote: > > Hallo everyone, > > I have installed the hadoop 0.18.3 on three linux machines, I am trying > to > > run the > > example of WordCountv1.0 on a cluster. But I guess I have a problem > > somewhere. > > * > > Problem* > > > > *After formating the name node:* > > I am getting several STARTUP_MSG and at the end a "SHUTDOWN_MSG: shutting > > down the namenode..." > > is this normal? > > > > *Afterwards I try starting the dfs:** > > *I get a message "starting namenode..."* *afterwards I get another > message > > "starting secondary namenode" > > at this stage the shell is blocked unless I press the enter key. Then the > > system tries to start another secondary > > namenode and the shell is then not blocked. What is going on? > > * > > Then I proceed an try starting the mapred:* > > I get the two messages "starting jobtracker....." and "starting > tasktracker" > > > > *Following the tutorial for runnin WordCode v1.0, If I try to list the > files > > in the input folder I have created > > *I get the famous error "Retrying connect to server:134.130.222.20:9000" > > .what am I doing something wrong? > > > > > > *Steps I have already verified* > > > > *I have already checked the iptables of the three machines and they > look**: > > ** > > *Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) > > target prot opt source destiantion > > > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) > > target prot opt source destination > > > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) > > target prot opt source destination > > > > * > > My hadoop-site.xml file looks like this > > * configuration> > > > > fs.default.name > > 134.130.222.20:9000/ > > > > > > mapred.job.tracker > > 134.130.222.18:9001 > > > > ........ > > > > > > *Can someone help me out?* > > *Thank you, CJ* > > > --000325574d2a545725046dcc2354-- From general-return-328-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 14:00:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27022 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 14:00:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 14:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14229 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:00:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14139 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:00:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14129 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 14:00:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:00:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:00:35 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2820440ewy.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=p+kDVoFeAa52X2zs5fb/+IZua5rrkvD0fNvvq5uk/y0=; b=E+ZG+gQdmg7/VvV+4rFqHBgTKotS8xEaRXK6s0Facyvn3QIS4bPnVLx7mpuZ12NwFb hMJsmb7Tj7wIGPe9QqpCKFlHIIRH14LnXeXE2S75nB1WIB81Ip349WMOxOiUnLe7CF5v etHdFr2ZfzJdyonvknlFUxwCFG7MwKsNbm9fk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pDGN07cG1cqHt7yRJRqcZHiSLwIg7WxROnEa+DQLK79UdZMY3wJjX4i+HAK1IHeJLk GOntf55m8gLKnXoTm1CLveY+NydSwq3JxvgNPQmXF5AP4/PThEc7NfAQRD9YyYNnWaog Fw+6MHhOJYbV1gTEOkOsD03OqDG9WL389bvuk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.208 with SMTP id h58mr360607weh.60.1246629613821; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:00:13 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907030700i12876a6dld5a6b6b3c76b30f9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks both. I'll brush up on my scripting skills ;o) On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, tim robertson = wrote: >> I am looking for something that allows easy ability to copy over a new >> Hadoop distribution and sync all the config files etc. =A0I'm not very >> good at system admin, so hoping there is are some tools to help speed >> things up. > > HINT: Password-less here SSH is not just because Doug wanted so. :) > /bin/bash with SSH/scp are your very opensource friends, e.g.: > > for hostname in `cat $HADOOP/slaves`; > do > =A0 echo "Doing stuff on $hostname"; > =A0 scp /local/file.txt $hostname:/path/on/remote/host/; > =A0 ssh $hostname cat /path/on/remote/host/file.txt; > done > > > P.S. Make sure "slaves" does not contains local host's IP. :-) > > -- > HTH, BM > > Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > From general-return-329-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 14:32:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45866 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 14:32:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 14:32:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 57255 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57225 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57215 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 14:32:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:32:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:32:20 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so1538348vwj.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CFAhDcJ21hqQHtehpR7vT/ez2kGis9x2nlpSyKVLAKc=; b=uhhDFw8wPeHCS5Di5WBzrTVjhUtdZ0I83Ojze4QsfV/6AHU2igWuLbisfi0fUn33E3 DfPHjEqsKMGKL2Cj0JimpVYb75RuxndOceLu3Ax7jL0q/+X/QvfWa38jCcHt9wNmQjGf wBKxlGy/u2VNqjhcYaU0JASnfC5rh07LbcDGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xCGO0VRxRGj0h7ZS/35Y7dH9AELMFZPVzooHRBibwcunP/OXH9ApokqGAb5FFdxYYR L6V1n8HPDvtLZGsY2hJ35CX2iE1FUFaenGD8e/uCKFnCEgdJRjA4Pyaf3hVJoV4c8osU F/X06UQ63bG5I3wWqNIG6pre3/9XY9ho/Pq1s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.96.15 with SMTP id f15mr2676615vcn.116.1246631519007; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 22:31:58 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6470efcdb33fe046dce0429 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6470efcdb33fe046dce0429 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I remove the ~/.ssh and regenerate the key and it seems I still need to provide password when I ssh localhost. Thank you very much even it couldn't be fixed finally. But I found there is some warning information: ssh localhost The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. On 7/1/09 11:09 PM, fred wang wrote: > sorry, should incopy ssh_config(instead of sshd_config) >> >> >> vi /etc/ssh/ssh_config >> >> # 1. command line options >> >> # 2. user-specific file >> >> # 3. system-wide file >> >> # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. >> >> # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the >> >> # configuration file, and defaults at the end. >> >> >> >> # Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. For a comprehensive >> >> # list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see the >> >> # ssh_config(5) man page. >> >> >> >> Host * >> >> # ForwardAgent no >> >> # ForwardX11 no >> >> # ForwardX11Trusted yes >> >> # RhostsRSAAuthentication no >> >> # RSAAuthentication yes >> >> # PasswordAuthentication yes >> >> # HostbasedAuthentication no >> >> # GSSAPIAuthentication no >> >> # GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no >> >> # GSSAPIKeyExchange no >> >> # GSSAPITrustDNS no >> >> # BatchMode no >> >> # CheckHostIP yes >> >> # AddressFamily any >> >> # ConnectTimeout 0 >> >> # StrictHostKeyChecking ask >> >> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity >> >> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa >> >> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa >> >> # Port 22 >> >> # Protocol 2,1 >> >> # Cipher 3des >> >> # Ciphers >> aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc >> >> # MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160 >> >> # EscapeChar ~ >> >> # Tunnel no >> >> # TunnelDevice any:any >> >> # PermitLocalCommand no >> >> SendEnv LANG LC_* >> >> HashKnownHosts yes >> >> GSSAPIAuthentication yes >> >> GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, fred wang wrote: >> >> Here is the output of ssh -v localhost and the configuration of >>> ssh_config, >>> >>> xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost >>> >>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 >>> >>> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config >>> >>> debug1: Applying options for * >>> >>> debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. >>> >>> debug1: Connection established. >>> >>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 >>> >>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 >>> >>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 >>> >>> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version >>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 >>> Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >>> >>> debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* >>> >>> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 >>> >>> debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received >>> >>> debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >>> >>> debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent >>> >>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent >>> >>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY >>> >>> debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. >>> >>> debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 >>> >>> debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent >>> >>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent >>> >>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received >>> >>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >>> >>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >>> >>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >>> >>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >>> >>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >>> >>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >>> >>> debug1: Next authentication method: password >>> >>> xxx@localhost's password: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config >>> >>> #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes >>> >>> #KerberosTicketCleanup yes >>> >>> >>> >>> # GSSAPI options >>> >>> #GSSAPIAuthentication no >>> >>> #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes >>> >>> >>> >>> X11Forwarding yes >>> >>> X11DisplayOffset 10 >>> >>> PrintMotd no >>> >>> PrintLastLog yes >>> >>> TCPKeepAlive yes >>> >>> #UseLogin no >>> >>> >>> >>> #MaxStartups 10:30:60 >>> >>> #Banner /etc/issue.net >>> >>> >>> >>> # Allow client to pass locale environment variables >>> >>> AcceptEnv LANG LC_* >>> >>> >>> >>> Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server >>> >>> >>> >>> UsePAM yes >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik>> >wrote: >>> >>> Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to >>>> accept >>>> publickey as a valid authorization mean. >>>> >>>> Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to the >>>> following: >>>> >>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: >>>> publickey,password,keyboard-interactive >>>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >>>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >>>> debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 >>>> debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA >>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: >>>> >>>> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't >>>>> work. >>>>> Thanks anyway >>>>> >>>>> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys >>>>> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >>>>> >>>>>> Cos >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to input >>>>>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to run >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this issue? >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>>>>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>>>>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>>>>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>>>>>> The key fingerprint is: >>>>>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>>>>>> passphrase): >>>>>>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introductory >>>>>>> paper. >>>>>>> " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>>>>>> no output >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ ssh localhost >>>>>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be >>>>>>> established. >>>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is >>>>>>> 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>>>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known >>>>>>> hosts. >>>>>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --0016e6470efcdb33fe046dce0429-- From general-return-330-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 14:45:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52453 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 14:45:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 14:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 78107 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:45:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78016 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 14:45:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78004 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 14:45:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:45:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:45:47 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2851592ewy.29 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:45:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FHehYSTnTiMNK/+0FinKd5x1gzAXcz3jwjF6Ck/XtgE=; b=kuZ9BaLTqtXzRi4NklweKEGJqzzYT5nBGJW7tOYFAGEtehEdSY270y3wPjbKdAdKD2 Q+1pLtXiFqiN0NbhbPRj5voF61O72n7uCdt/bZYeaSrpvdcLciUmEut16MvZg5iTxx6/ ONnOvLtdInrtuYaVkmGEL3KKg3X+MhvLrtaLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xE0cwOZHhvDO57PS+wnaURRR2JdZfurjXvaVcPO7dsfDwhAHE6QbuvZhtcQhvHDGta I2Z2eVGDTo7cwhfv4906ktbXZkUHeSSb/QtWDU/wbvQUrifiBK9ZvPUQANmzI8WKmRmJ GP6Tg0xqFs/+dYskfyVlqxJ+PscI2wjkwQKGw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.2.210 with SMTP id 60mr380216wef.21.1246632327677; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:45:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907030745g19ef2593o457f48972ef51ea@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This seemed to me to be a good resource (e.g. it worked for me): http://fak3r.com/2006/08/10/howto-passwordless-ssh-logins/ Tim On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM, fred wang wrote: > I remove the ~/.ssh and regenerate the key and it seems I still need to > provide password when I ssh localhost. Thank you very much even it couldn= 't > be fixed finally. > > But I found there is some warning information: > > ssh localhost > > The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. > > RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > On 7/1/09 11:09 PM, fred wang wrote: > >> =A0sorry, should incopy ssh_config(instead of sshd_config) >>> >>> >>> vi /etc/ssh/ssh_config >>> >>> # =A01. command line options >>> >>> # =A02. user-specific file >>> >>> # =A03. system-wide file >>> >>> # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. >>> >>> # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the >>> >>> # configuration file, and defaults at the end. >>> >>> >>> >>> # Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. =A0For a comprehen= sive >>> >>> # list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see th= e >>> >>> # ssh_config(5) man page. >>> >>> >>> >>> Host * >>> >>> # =A0 ForwardAgent no >>> >>> # =A0 ForwardX11 no >>> >>> # =A0 ForwardX11Trusted yes >>> >>> # =A0 RhostsRSAAuthentication no >>> >>> # =A0 RSAAuthentication yes >>> >>> # =A0 PasswordAuthentication yes >>> >>> # =A0 HostbasedAuthentication no >>> >>> # =A0 GSSAPIAuthentication no >>> >>> # =A0 GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no >>> >>> # =A0 GSSAPIKeyExchange no >>> >>> # =A0 GSSAPITrustDNS no >>> >>> # =A0 BatchMode no >>> >>> # =A0 CheckHostIP yes >>> >>> # =A0 AddressFamily any >>> >>> # =A0 ConnectTimeout 0 >>> >>> # =A0 StrictHostKeyChecking ask >>> >>> # =A0 IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity >>> >>> # =A0 IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa >>> >>> # =A0 IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>> >>> # =A0 Port 22 >>> >>> # =A0 Protocol 2,1 >>> >>> # =A0 Cipher 3des >>> >>> # =A0 Ciphers >>> aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-= cbc >>> >>> # =A0 MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160 >>> >>> # =A0 EscapeChar ~ >>> >>> # =A0 Tunnel no >>> >>> # =A0 TunnelDevice any:any >>> >>> # =A0 PermitLocalCommand no >>> >>> =A0 =A0 SendEnv LANG LC_* >>> >>> =A0 =A0 HashKnownHosts yes >>> >>> =A0 =A0 GSSAPIAuthentication yes >>> >>> =A0 =A0 GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, fred wang =A0wro= te: >>> >>> Here is the output of ssh -v localhost =A0and the configuration of >>>> ssh_config, >>>> >>>> xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost >>>> >>>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 >>>> >>>> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config >>>> >>>> debug1: Applying options for * >>>> >>>> debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. >>>> >>>> debug1: Connection established. >>>> >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 >>>> >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 >>>> >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 >>>> >>>> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version >>>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 >>>> Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >>>> >>>> debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* >>>> >>>> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 >>>> >>>> debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received >>>> >>>> debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >>>> >>>> debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent >>>> >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent >>>> >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY >>>> >>>> debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. >>>> >>>> debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 >>>> >>>> debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent >>>> >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent >>>> >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received >>>> >>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >>>> >>>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >>>> >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >>>> >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >>>> >>>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >>>> >>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password >>>> >>>> debug1: Next authentication method: password >>>> >>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config >>>> >>>> #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes >>>> >>>> #KerberosTicketCleanup yes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> # GSSAPI options >>>> >>>> #GSSAPIAuthentication no >>>> >>>> #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> X11Forwarding yes >>>> >>>> X11DisplayOffset 10 >>>> >>>> PrintMotd no >>>> >>>> PrintLastLog yes >>>> >>>> TCPKeepAlive yes >>>> >>>> #UseLogin no >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> #MaxStartups 10:30:60 >>>> >>>> #Banner /etc/issue.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> # Allow client to pass locale environment variables >>>> >>>> AcceptEnv LANG LC_* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> UsePAM yes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik>>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to >>>>> accept >>>>> publickey as a valid authorization mean. >>>>> >>>>> Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to = the >>>>> following: >>>>> >>>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: >>>>> publickey,password,keyboard-interactive >>>>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey >>>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity >>>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa >>>>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa >>>>> debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 >>>>> debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA >>>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). >>>>> >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't >>>>>> work. >>>>>> Thanks anyway >>>>>> >>>>>> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys >>>>>> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =A0 I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to i= nput >>>>>>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to = run >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> psuedo-distributed operation, =A0could anyone help me solve this i= ssue? >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (2) execution steps and ouput >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa >>>>>>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. >>>>>>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. >>>>>>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. >>>>>>>> The key fingerprint is: >>>>>>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **note: it doesn't have message =A0'Enter passphrase (empty for no >>>>>>>> passphrase): >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some introd= uctory >>>>>>>> paper. >>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> =A0 =A0~/.ssh/authorized_keys >>>>>>>> no output >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ ssh localhost >>>>>>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be >>>>>>>> established. >>>>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is >>>>>>>> 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. >>>>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes >>>>>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known >>>>>>>> hosts. >>>>>>>> xxx@localhost's password: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > From general-return-331-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 18:05:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32745 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 18:05:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 18:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4678 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4599 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4589 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 18:05:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:05:29 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so893228fge.12 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.25.19 with SMTP id 19mr1081486fgy.71.1246644308309; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:05:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030700i12876a6dld5a6b6b3c76b30f9@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030700i12876a6dld5a6b6b3c76b30f9@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:04:48 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100907031104s5fc40245tca4ba09cb65e60e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We build (and use) RPM & deb packages for Hadoop. See http://cloudera.com/hadoop . You can package up your config files into an RPM too (see my.cloudera.com) or use rsync for those, and you can distribute the binaries by pointing your machines to a yum/apt repository. Cheers, -- Philip On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:00 AM, tim robertson wr= ote: > Thanks both. =A0I'll brush up on my scripting skills ;o) > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Bogdan M. > Maryniuk wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, tim robertson= wrote: >>> I am looking for something that allows easy ability to copy over a new >>> Hadoop distribution and sync all the config files etc. =A0I'm not very >>> good at system admin, so hoping there is are some tools to help speed >>> things up. >> >> HINT: Password-less here SSH is not just because Doug wanted so. :) >> /bin/bash with SSH/scp are your very opensource friends, e.g.: >> >> for hostname in `cat $HADOOP/slaves`; >> do >> =A0 echo "Doing stuff on $hostname"; >> =A0 scp /local/file.txt $hostname:/path/on/remote/host/; >> =A0 ssh $hostname cat /path/on/remote/host/file.txt; >> done >> >> >> P.S. Make sure "slaves" does not contains local host's IP. :-) >> >> -- >> HTH, BM >> >> Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. >> > From general-return-332-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 22:01:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28355 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 22:01:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 22:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 78651 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 22:02:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78574 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 22:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78564 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 22:02:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:02:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ross.dmochowski@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:01:58 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so1690979vwj.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:01:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5FXziWiOlmI5e195RMsgNWoJK0mYMzPu9rrYKB0iDio=; b=cfq4HZf69ibNH9Auqdyida4i3oq0vBY0lRO3jFdmF4F+Ui4GQKzceL7llqWWUyeGyu zQF4euSAdyo/VGvNhVulkNH3vwWuy7Zc6n5dCpFI1BtNFKhmLnIG3KsgiecWigJJSNfM frGUytFWLu9ndV8Uoq1zhIf178zXKhoo7w1K8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nIK/JARblybLSLYDac1l5LxvJ1NLBocubqIBNhMSCvX0V/3TGMUE+mteTYILvPS9cp UzS2Cve09MLEVCx2QRFBG6US3sbKf99NcYI/3jpD280TZDt+lTUEmTBNnvIU+VIVRdbe b4LT4bLMy+GP3Af1k2FBPinY/IXmQ2nF4lWOI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.72.78 with SMTP id l14mr3601044vcj.81.1246658497326; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:01:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100907031104s5fc40245tca4ba09cb65e60e@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030700i12876a6dld5a6b6b3c76b30f9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100907031104s5fc40245tca4ba09cb65e60e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:01:37 -0700 Message-ID: <605941800907031501l756e3db5ud88da9f864f4de6e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? From: RSD To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am in the Technical Operations Dept at Hi5, and recently given responsibility for service delivery in regards to our Hadoop installation. I highly recommend investing the time with CFEngine, as it is a mature robust configuration management framework, and really what you want for anything more sophisticated than a simple one or two box dev instance. From general-return-333-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 04 03:40:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32133 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 03:40:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 03:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 24945 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 03:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24797 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 03:40:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24787 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2009 03:40:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:40:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:40:10 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so2449533pzk.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6ZpyywOLFlu2oxnXA/uX9HYBqj0tKcQE1itvG1lAC1A=; b=Rc9Nv/EGQ8D9SbznBAv9eH4SY7QdKBbunsUHL1n/AubkpPj6/rzCWx5VFHatsUtiuy 9SZKmqrAJZ7ofNsGRQUmZuC9qsPNTmPDazIyXvYytkkzGj1ueEpUHy3e+ymZaPyKv/8G 8Z7NTtjCerV40TqFK53cqb1PRjV+VnTun+Dv8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bu/FEHJe/Pgl7PX0FvyX8OYCxz100cIFZJQNSAS6+/kgotvJcF8Lvu+RFIwpSy/xlz 13DynrL9/cCwq7XzdJP+PQHmUI3/obzQBp1APM1s6wANPn2bQlvIwxJI0iqFGHW+7y51 zeE5pKzk4V5H8NV8NBzRVAN9qxCCmha8Azxl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.238.9 with SMTP id l9mr734011wfh.90.1246678790592; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:39:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <605941800907031501l756e3db5ud88da9f864f4de6e@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907030206l77a30d41yef2704e176f6d90f@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030700i12876a6dld5a6b6b3c76b30f9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100907031104s5fc40245tca4ba09cb65e60e@mail.gmail.com> <605941800907031501l756e3db5ud88da9f864f4de6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:39:50 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tools to help administer a cluster? From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:01 AM, RSD wrote: > I highly recommend investing the time with CFEngine Not sure how CFEngine can be better than simple script in bash for administering Hadoop in this case. But I am sure how it might be a disaster when you forget e.g. a semicolon in some certain place and run it. On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: > We build (and use) RPM & deb packages for Hadoop. In that case Tim has to decide messing up with http://rpm4darwin.sourceforge.net/ (read: seriously affect his infrastructure with rpm'ed Darwin ports) or not. I am not sure how your Linux-only packages will work on "rpmized" OSX either. > See http://cloudera.com/hadoop . You can package up your config files > into an RPM too (see my.cloudera.com) or use rsync for those, and you > can distribute the binaries by pointing your machines to a yum/apt > repository. Any plans to support IPS (http://opensolaris.org/os/project/pkg/)? C'mon, guys, Java on Solaris is still better and ZFS has much more advantage over standard POSIX bridges that are available on Linux at the moment. :-) I've got running Hadoop on Solaris and its zones finally good: just for some reason Hadoop disliked ZFS rpool within a zone, but asks for a real device mounted. Haven't figured out it yet by reading sources, since I am too new to Hadoop, but that's was the only issue so far (0.20 and 0.19.1 versions tried). -- BM From general-return-334-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 04 04:52:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43887 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 04:52:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 04:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 51729 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 04:52:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51629 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 04:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51619 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2009 04:52:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:52:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:52:46 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so2409100pxi.5 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:52:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=21bj28juxk3JR6mOZW0RUMIOQrzbHDCe1xzzQ9moWOk=; b=LfTcyFoGdPELHvM4fPKwqXjLzPq2pxZQ48zYmMnQUag0egDLYZGHP9wKDBbcMcliRe szYgQnXIxSkHjiSJRZLidDTJepFm8R+ZFSE+1gYOquJkgOlSVaFG2LIJGayCwsIuU7tw 7sR/B8wmN3ZGN8aIll3+/xhS7kM0fNyrCgqx8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ObDSSEzBloVOBM7GU3nddHc2Ivg+M8crNTcIpg3d9nExrfXLywjYq8/UAt/nZYHs+b eC+B9n6vEKoaGxc1yvt5BVlt5pvAhkVhhrGNAohVKxc8slMedk96/jFVc7+U+KqCkr2c eu0hm+igaheILHowg2+4QuCC0mVIxOib8YD1o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.125.8 with SMTP id x8mr715675wfc.44.1246683145464; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:52:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <32120a6a0907030226m28d6bfc9w1b6af48f8db42347@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:52:25 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: My secondary namenode seem not be running, and may be the reason of my problem!!! From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, C J wrote: > *Can anyone tell me why the namenode and the jobtracker were never started? How about providing here recent information from $HADOOP/logs/ ?.. -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-335-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 04 17:20:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45667 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 17:20:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 17:20:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 73904 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 17:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73815 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 17:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73805 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2009 17:21:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:21:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:20:55 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so4180814gxk.5 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QdgDjOmAt8Wor8e8nuBOwYLRyzFJnhp2r1h8gm/eyGI=; b=OvIhzuHv5Hu00Fl9xOtmSzM6BWJ7c8rRqjaJvNMdzN7Jwmw2fTg2RmnJVCmcr+GJt1 7sq9Tv7lb7eHCfxbnUKNWwnp88thb43oPs7kEn4BQvJEq69WU06JX+7haeF0xxTQ1snZ TOtID9Dn5rjX+ycxUMLq8cJO9WFyvu+vYmDZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EVaZvCCrKQ3r9oaGoziPdCvvAaYlW6GbJ62AWc0soYIeHPKCbeBzyV3a+C00cLZeB2 Qx8pefLlLXXcmFemPe6qwfFbiS7MjerFLjC9Z/UMM6RWQsev6rlVKjOOXXO0ClN47j7p 2IuEBE62N4MnBMBiGoVy2ON02OSQcsTNkdLKw= Received: by 10.90.68.20 with SMTP id q20mr2248640aga.104.1246728034716; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.26? (c-67-175-38-73.hsd1.in.comcast.net [67.175.38.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 38sm8810856aga.1.2009.07.04.10.20.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A4F8F60.9030607@apache.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:20:32 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Combiner Problem References: <396ceda90907022144p3b66a345g1b3b52a1ac5b7969@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <396ceda90907022144p3b66a345g1b3b52a1ac5b7969@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This question would be more appropriate on the mapreduce-users at hadoop.apache.org mailing list. Unfortunately Hadoop's website is out of date right now and does not describe the currently correct mailing lists. Is someone working to fix this? We do not want general@ to become a place for end-user questions. Doug 乔木 wrote: > Hi, everyone > > I've been learning hadoop recently and I'm confused about the combiner > mechanism. > > There is a property min.num.spills.for.combine specifying the minimum number > of spills to run combiner when merging. The default value is 3. Why there is > such a restriction? Should it be better that run the combiner no matter how > many spills there are? > > The second question is why the combiner could be run at the reduce side. > Can't the reduce function take place of that? > > Thanks very much. From general-return-336-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 18:40:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94183 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 18:40:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 18:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 65576 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 18:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65474 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 18:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65464 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 18:40:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:40:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:40:11 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so2753564yxe.5 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=+00XRZ2D7msAU1Fgz7h+6du9rIeE9idgfIcHexoQTyc=; b=jv8wf0ycPoU3s7qD6LKy6DvHMy3ol7fqoYtGHN7hYbQcuB3brD5Kk/UGfI+HIsDOZl +rXOBDJ+KNcZQ1YZtN9yV9BsKFxdv/qTo5s5fbhmLiLQDffoUhwo5MIWxUC47D9W4646 5Da1+M1C/EBNOIlNK5gh3L4z9cb0AetcckezM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Yeqbr2EOuN+RQ2yfZsz5cf8FFn4q3/xPU6llgtHn9hvWamADpFo9RojMT7ocRr/qW7 04xAKJFvgIRu2vszN6ivRcAfJRk7smjbzoMDptITpaLt8zlghEe+PppPpK+up41I5IJl /URO+ShcnR2QwBls3xYXGwV0UWgAX7dL5z2n0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.10.137 with SMTP id p9mr30518ibp.52.1246819189901; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:39:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d60f9e9c88b046df9b6b6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d60f9e9c88b046df9b6b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It is really icredible, If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create a new thread the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop and with communicating with people who are trying to help as well. What shall I do? --0022152d60f9e9c88b046df9b6b6-- From general-return-337-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 18:58:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96246 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 18:58:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 18:58:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 77172 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 18:58:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77100 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 18:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77090 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 18:58:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:58:48 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so4023767ewy.29 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cGi6UlLaAMFYkss3mPG/PG09N3sIso105YITZ8bxWGY=; b=OdLcXcHZtY5P4GsxIVsAD5F56bo61nmoRPrUcJb9IzhYPfixk9iUhWo5fxNBSHM1Sp iqbdoq03zBy4S3TLCX+9W/EXqmOQzd1qOMAQgbE4wlPx8rWIZonrRmiLs3Si1AvpvL7q iAVpoyewEoLpDARLkbpllXXY3Rpe3bPFSzZ9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xgkYVv3IoLknN9e4KSIfgwqIOW4mmC6Aq2an3NBJ72pgIu2ko3cwk2bflKRDdCQHJZ q43cHnEGL+D0mQhfc3VHdKfO3yxhh7eO+xrsMo+OjiPUknK7i26Mw08IcWRGoV8xev7+ HOaKOOjZ0FXHYjVg0zox62cbODsFY2xYJdcgo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.29.72 with SMTP id h50mr930377wea.137.1246820308549; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:58:28 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907051158k39976c2bi19963fa655ef158a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi CJ, Certainly some of your mails are coming through ok as we got this. You weren't blocked when you had your recent thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/200907.mbox/%3Caa41f20e0907030517g3f2889d0u4d1ab2584de15bf8@mail.gmail.com%3E Perhaps it is you email provider itself? Try a different account perhaps? Are you trying to send messages to lists that you aren't a member of maybe? - you need to join each list seperately (hadoop-core, hadoop-mapreduce etc) Cheers, Tim On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:39 PM, C J wrote: > It is really icredible, > If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create a > new thread > the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop and > with communicating > with people who are trying to help as well. > What shall I do? > From general-return-338-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 19:01:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96811 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:01:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 77919 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77831 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77821 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:02:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.9.59] (HELO web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.9.59) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:01:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 66630 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jul 2009 19:01:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1246820490; bh=Q8ET9UoeJIT+9LsgSIDSVvV2JKagX+gXsRboCsoFP+8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lK3TX5jp+XBywqVJ9xvf7sWAnS26buIAPvRVMsDC5rG5m59dOiSu/LOOATlU713oQKP82XNdOnfl+7piClQaQhr6bE+gYmlIbi4873KDYsz0Bc8Fbk8jTMU4KZjLySieiGS0zaYD17/5FKUZk7khQwiuV48MzJqAynWT4xsLDH8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iJvR39vp23UMDJZajhGobUv182wF5/kjkKSPyiMJLv0UXRjGT7bzccxm+jfmdyLKbHOkkWj3jnwJCUaIOpHq5/PVUCIyYQpl9DmZQ97oNpa54vjdya25dE1Vs69Um1pSCTOivimOobc9IyGgHqvs5Eb6jWJlgzNKFVwd0nBS91E=; Message-ID: <798259.44995.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CvfbqpgVM1kJMuZwH2n7B.K3yVy01l.b5hECWMhjb.2JzFG6i4WqK0sUE504hds2.9ESetWD7wnFYrLLEAVXqtsvHx_CEkeCRfByElSiLsVCamgHZ2.rJavDyzSyjdV7bxxeC6jrdC4Un8hitwvNk1S4vDxkMRnK3cyv0.OMly1uro2oyveLxRIwLQ1tNKWG0c9FwQAKh3YU4ftqASwJxOz.Ox_ALinnRt6AxxxL4cscqh2vQYW42J.bP_g_GLHt2XzzT9i38kzI81xab9qQdCqJdFRG980FcRx0Fdbf0tSoyyApGKbC_8xuJuWdulXvlsCmsxflUTzck5PFhg-- Received: from [87.248.121.240] by web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:01:30 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Chad Walters Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The problem is likely related to the period in your user name. I've found that the Apache mailing list system has a lot of issues with that. Try using an alternate address without a period in the user name. Chad Sent from my iPhone On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, C J wrote: It is really icredible, If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create a new thread the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop and with communicating with people who are trying to help as well. What shall I do? From general-return-339-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 19:09:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98016 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:09:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:09:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 83247 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83158 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83148 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 19:09:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:09:12 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so2767790yxe.5 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JqqXawW4CWEKMu8+duTGuQqU7wCpUrMMQzU5EoQZtVg=; b=VkM/paG5DdtBSraBqq8l9yeXefQe8ywecXfx888bNJorsJkqMF0loQul+cCL9HhQa7 jdFs38sLrpFrT1mDabtIUaZKAGUo+w2W7N8EM7CKO2g2epZl3JQpbFvXS6W6W3Vu9QRf xeI+c/d8N+9XXyEy7aGkr2iMv9hkYtqBF+Lpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lDqwV+atu52T5ffjvWvPpz+krcTALjywDspklecRrPO/IgDQPFEPWnxZ/ERfRdmO5M BxVKld0dNHssu6JMceRZ/o2aJbrDe65lk9ybrLRbT9wj6pFYZHhRs9aqPj42ABRxnpoZ GYuHIWroRce4K1LSi7AnEHTf3ask+5fFWaCQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.11 with SMTP id a11mr1835829ibd.38.1246820931672; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:08:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907051158k39976c2bi19963fa655ef158a@mail.gmail.com> References: <32120a6a0907051158k39976c2bi19963fa655ef158a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:08:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d6d75bb1b18046dfa1e50 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d6d75bb1b18046dfa1e50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Basically what I have done, is that I registered myself three weeks ago to the list you have on the website core-user@hadoop.apache.org. (which is by the way not working now) I got an automaticd reply for the registration. Now what shall I do? there is as far as I know no other list on the website? Shall I send an email to general@hadoop.apache.org and another one to common-user@hadoop.apache.org and ask that they register me? or could you please register me to theses lists at least and send me a confirmation email? I would really appreciate this, then I will try afterwards to anwer your emails and send you my log files. Thank zou tim, On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:58 PM, tim robertson wrote: > Hi CJ, > > Certainly some of your mails are coming through ok as we got this. > > You weren't blocked when you had your recent thread: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/200907.mbox/%3Caa41f20e0907030517g3f2889d0u4d1ab2584de15bf8@mail.gmail.com%3E > > Perhaps it is you email provider itself? Try a different account perhaps? > Are you trying to send messages to lists that you aren't a member of > maybe? - you need to join each list seperately (hadoop-core, > hadoop-mapreduce etc) > > Cheers, > > Tim > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:39 PM, C J wrote: > > It is really icredible, > > If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create > a > > new thread > > the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop > and > > with communicating > > with people who are trying to help as well. > > What shall I do? > > > --0022152d6d75bb1b18046dfa1e50-- From general-return-340-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 19:11:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98369 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:11:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:11:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 84103 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84017 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84007 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 19:11:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:11:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:11:06 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so4854999gxk.5 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:10:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bc5vDRpdM4UlO6izjiF2pKcPdOZRSPDJ1jFVCok6auM=; b=buky+kHgUFeRW4NLeui1R7w/j/hHha92QuL76LM9WhPlXfOJ7cOug2sX0BvmYTyWUM /mmx/JvfU/lt53vTmy4VUff6l637bYjxRP8U337CvHuEhyjhqkXiKNNGemsrxC91BvwJ gmyIEJpblw1DOx8DwhTJ1wCMePtvQ2Fs0mNoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GGzcbEyDU0oP+gDT0xkRHcgCYZrL8iQmJWvkfUDV+9g2IJS/+anZSqyrzR41XHd0YV qFUFvl9um7ByFst+pGzAK2WZ+v4269QGdjw7v0jSkfhbSwm2LbXWbx4biX2dWQzwDvay rtimWi/CooYrrKao2vY2GjiDPWvQ69C7NN9G8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.14.4 with SMTP id e4mr1831210iba.33.1246821045567; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:10:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <798259.44995.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <798259.44995.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:10:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532c7a4850065046dfa2509 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221532c7a4850065046dfa2509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Really? Ok then I will try to create the same account without the period and try again. Thank you On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Chad Walters wrote: > > The problem is likely related to the period in your user name. I've found > that the Apache mailing list system has a lot of issues with that. Try using > an alternate address without a period in the user name. > > Chad > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, C J wrote: > > It is really icredible, > If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create a > new thread > the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop > and > with communicating > with people who are trying to help as well. > What shall I do? > > --00221532c7a4850065046dfa2509-- From general-return-341-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 19:25:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1689 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:25:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:25:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 89942 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:25:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89859 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:25:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89849 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 19:25:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:25:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:25:49 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so4037004ewy.29 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mi1v6zXaznuV9eIJzk1SnTA41xUedqtfEjge+CZmUVc=; b=MJBmPRvEDhJBFt7lXqDXcjZ64CizWWSZcCmuzy1g1FCPi+x/DIE0FIbw7ok3u28J53 ii9tdasUCv5dtMWP0BJFXzhOf54pHMa4rQiAlPQa4mi/8b2z8DTnwKZyStrxeC/9f1Bv t2lYAIY0bpKosnWU81PkfDsueiWnjWiwj6RIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V2LuVscHdhWiRq2GUuImCyxcJcLvSTohqOGr8sx8pAzuFjjyX/o+mpGC/96HZR23KE jgfB4jG83uC7bT4OtlM8nIWL64u0CTiC2qauBggQ4F6D75oclfuIB6iJu/NODNzYAsIh 6vLRVeg/+xLSgbJP11C4+wDvgAua/EVT9UGLw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.29.72 with SMTP id h50mr935805wea.137.1246821929493; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:25:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <798259.44995.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907051225k318f5b4ek15000df6fb06a5aa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To subscribe CJ, just send a mail to: common-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org (this is the old core-user renamed) mapreduce-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org hdfs-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org general-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org (you must have already done this) Cheers Tim On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, C J wrote: > Really? > Ok then I will try to create the same account without the period and try > again. > Thank you > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Chad Walters wrote: > >> >> The problem is likely related to the period in your user name. I've found >> that the Apache mailing list system has a lot of issues with that. Try using >> an alternate address without a period in the user name. >> >> Chad >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, C J wrote: >> >> It is really icredible, >> If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create a >> new thread >> the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop >> and >> with communicating >> with people who are trying to help as well. >> What shall I do? >> >> > From general-return-342-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 05 19:37:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3868 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 19:37:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 19:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 93770 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93700 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 19:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93690 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 19:37:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:37:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:37:30 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so2781704yxe.5 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y61E7hkPluHshKB66ddIhahER/NOyulE1sGK0Er9fb8=; b=lZfcP6LaNo12FeTWnmd35q9MrJIoSLuqDdykPoyNfx86665mVvbtde5w/Rsqtqb9Gx rFPbHUniLuAblkGMdc2BzSBKyblleG+OClVj9T93cYQTcefousbA/lxIeRds0BwTh5bp OFi2E5bO79BjUn//xqDFvF84SolSHUbjr8+tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lHJVd5WNWscivluNxOQ/2Jj0UjroW8Fd811Pwu1THNOqfcy76WNzIuer1KVYz00M0k TW6WFndyfzKzDV6RYRVBB5Q/Kysw8RGfviICglf+TYfTvDjQBquvkmjg2alqo5Kto7Gn phDugbHj90vo2eYDbOK3KXGVeHBYL8IuEgJOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.13.201 with SMTP id d9mr1822287iba.35.1246822629225; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907051225k318f5b4ek15000df6fb06a5aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <798259.44995.qm@web65515.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <32120a6a0907051225k318f5b4ek15000df6fb06a5aa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:37:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sending you an email is incredible!!! From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325575fdee9b58d046dfa83d8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325575fdee9b58d046dfa83d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok I have registered to the two missing email lists: mapreduce...and hdfs.... I shall try to send my email problem to one of those if not, I will try again from another email address without a "dot" in the middle of the username. Many thanks On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:25 PM, tim robertson wrote: > To subscribe CJ, just send a mail to: > > common-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org (this is the old core-user > renamed) > mapreduce-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org > hdfs-user-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org > > general-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org (you must have already done this) > > Cheers > > Tim > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, C J wrote: > > Really? > > Ok then I will try to create the same account without the period and try > > again. > > Thank you > > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Chad Walters > wrote: > > > >> > >> The problem is likely related to the period in your user name. I've > found > >> that the Apache mailing list system has a lot of issues with that. Try > using > >> an alternate address without a period in the user name. > >> > >> Chad > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Jul 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, C J wrote: > >> > >> It is really icredible, > >> If I reply to one of your emails the email cannot be sent, and if create > a > >> new thread > >> the email cannot be send as well. I am completly blocked, with my hadoop > >> and > >> with communicating > >> with people who are trying to help as well. > >> What shall I do? > >> > >> > > > --000325575fdee9b58d046dfa83d8-- From general-return-343-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 05:13:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70495 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 05:13:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 05:13:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 68530 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 05:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68432 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 05:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68422 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 05:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-vw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:13:26 +0000 Received: by vwj2 with SMTP id 2so2894512vwj.5 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:13:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=42wwpziNfDjWQ9THlwlADceUGkOAfFKSBOkUi5Si2fw=; b=d6gaVkJhVfEh+ToP/ZPDKGaTKGpWIb8GjDNli89rb0/qDpuG5adp1o04xXtiIP7d12 KaTwWJTPbGXGFwkB+ERkXsOScbT/svPW7Mkn82X7qEe0qnXaa35cDcQZiDodkpeo4VDg DzE3l8brkhcz6pw3yWZL3yPrO+AY0AkMqcLeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vYcqm7tVJxIR2iwquluLd6a3AXu3mgp++0qmWvyhJhFQKaojUbM+y6jxX7WqhqEz+Z e35Gf48l4KEJ2bttkEGT2ces5h1BCS5z37o4izmPDbloEBBg/1l+TWoizgvoujNZCdOv thqGFAWYSkPlqmNgz1NDrCL/donyx8VoU3q2M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.46.20 with SMTP id h20mr8705545vcf.55.1246857185013; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:13:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907030745g19ef2593o457f48972ef51ea@mail.gmail.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030745g19ef2593o457f48972ef51ea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:13:04 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907052213u6b13190ap35ebc1df2c206d3b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ecd80993093046e028f26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ecd80993093046e028f26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit it doesn't work.. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:45 PM, tim robertson wrote: > This seemed to me to be a good resource (e.g. it worked for me): > http://fak3r.com/2006/08/10/howto-passwordless-ssh-logins/ > > Tim > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM, fred wang wrote: > > I remove the ~/.ssh and regenerate the key and it seems I still need to > > provide password when I ssh localhost. Thank you very much even it > couldn't > > be fixed finally. > > > > But I found there is some warning information: > > > > ssh localhost > > > > The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be established. > > > > RSA key fingerprint is 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > On 7/1/09 11:09 PM, fred wang wrote: > > > >> sorry, should incopy ssh_config(instead of sshd_config) > >>> > >>> > >>> vi /etc/ssh/ssh_config > >>> > >>> # 1. command line options > >>> > >>> # 2. user-specific file > >>> > >>> # 3. system-wide file > >>> > >>> # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. > >>> > >>> # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the > >>> > >>> # configuration file, and defaults at the end. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> # Site-wide defaults for some commonly used options. For a > comprehensive > >>> > >>> # list of available options, their meanings and defaults, please see > the > >>> > >>> # ssh_config(5) man page. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Host * > >>> > >>> # ForwardAgent no > >>> > >>> # ForwardX11 no > >>> > >>> # ForwardX11Trusted yes > >>> > >>> # RhostsRSAAuthentication no > >>> > >>> # RSAAuthentication yes > >>> > >>> # PasswordAuthentication yes > >>> > >>> # HostbasedAuthentication no > >>> > >>> # GSSAPIAuthentication no > >>> > >>> # GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no > >>> > >>> # GSSAPIKeyExchange no > >>> > >>> # GSSAPITrustDNS no > >>> > >>> # BatchMode no > >>> > >>> # CheckHostIP yes > >>> > >>> # AddressFamily any > >>> > >>> # ConnectTimeout 0 > >>> > >>> # StrictHostKeyChecking ask > >>> > >>> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity > >>> > >>> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa > >>> > >>> # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa > >>> > >>> # Port 22 > >>> > >>> # Protocol 2,1 > >>> > >>> # Cipher 3des > >>> > >>> # Ciphers > >>> > aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc > >>> > >>> # MACs hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,umac-64@openssh.com,hmac-ripemd160 > >>> > >>> # EscapeChar ~ > >>> > >>> # Tunnel no > >>> > >>> # TunnelDevice any:any > >>> > >>> # PermitLocalCommand no > >>> > >>> SendEnv LANG LC_* > >>> > >>> HashKnownHosts yes > >>> > >>> GSSAPIAuthentication yes > >>> > >>> GSSAPIDelegateCredentials no > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM, fred wang > wrote: > >>> > >>> Here is the output of ssh -v localhost and the configuration of > >>>> ssh_config, > >>>> > >>>> xxx@xxx-desktop:~$ ssh -v localhost > >>>> > >>>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Applying options for * > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Connecting to localhost [127.0.0.1] port 22. > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Connection established. > >>>> > >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/identity type -1 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: identity file /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version > >>>> OpenSSH_4.7p1 > >>>> Debian-8ubuntu1.2 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 pat OpenSSH* > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7p1 Debian-8ubuntu1.2 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received > >>>> > >>>> debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none > >>>> > >>>> debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent > >>>> > >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent > >>>> > >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Host 'localhost' is known and matches the RSA host key. > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Found key in /home/xxx/.ssh/known_hosts:1 > >>>> > >>>> debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent > >>>> > >>>> debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent > >>>> > >>>> debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password > >>>> > >>>> debug1: Next authentication method: password > >>>> > >>>> xxx@localhost's password: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> xxx@xxx:~$ vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config > >>>> > >>>> #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes > >>>> > >>>> #KerberosTicketCleanup yes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> # GSSAPI options > >>>> > >>>> #GSSAPIAuthentication no > >>>> > >>>> #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> X11Forwarding yes > >>>> > >>>> X11DisplayOffset 10 > >>>> > >>>> PrintMotd no > >>>> > >>>> PrintLastLog yes > >>>> > >>>> TCPKeepAlive yes > >>>> > >>>> #UseLogin no > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> #MaxStartups 10:30:60 > >>>> > >>>> #Banner /etc/issue.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> # Allow client to pass locale environment variables > >>>> > >>>> AcceptEnv LANG LC_* > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> UsePAM yes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>>> >wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Yet another possibility is that your SSH daemon isn't configured to > >>>>> accept > >>>>> publickey as a valid authorization mean. > >>>>> > >>>>> Try to do ssh -v localhost and check if there's something similar to > the > >>>>> following: > >>>>> > >>>>> debug1: Authentications that can continue: > >>>>> publickey,password,keyboard-interactive > >>>>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > >>>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/identity > >>>>> debug1: Trying private key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_rsa > >>>>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa > >>>>> debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-dss blen 435 > >>>>> debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA > >>>>> debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). > >>>>> > >>>>> Cos > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 7/1/09 10:11 PM, fred wang wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I have setup ./.ssh/authorized keys has permssion 600, but it didn't > >>>>>> work. > >>>>>> Thanks anyway > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ls -l .ssh/authorized_keys > >>>>>> -rw------- 1 xxx xxx 1222 2009-07-02 13:08 .ssh/authorized_keys > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Konstantin Boudnik< > cos@yahoo-inc.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Make sure that your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys has permissions 600 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cos > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 7/1/09 7:35 AM, fred wang wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I failed to setup passphraseless ssh(I mean, I still need to > input > >>>>>>>> password to do ssh localhost) when I tried to configure Hadoop to > run > >>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>> psuedo-distributed operation, could anyone help me solve this > issue? > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (1)I use the Putty0.6 to remote access to Ubuntu by SSH. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> (2) execution steps and ouput > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > >>>>>>>> Generating public/private dsa key pair. > >>>>>>>> Your identification has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa. > >>>>>>>> Your public key has been saved in /home/xxx/.ssh/id_dsa.pub. > >>>>>>>> The key fingerprint is: > >>>>>>>> a9:39:4c:9b:22:f9:a4:77:70:24:fa:bf:12:f5:81:81 xxx > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> **note: it doesn't have message 'Enter passphrase (empty for no > >>>>>>>> passphrase): > >>>>>>>> Enter same passphrase again: ' which appear in some > introductory > >>>>>>>> paper. > >>>>>>>> " > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub>> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > >>>>>>>> no output > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> $ ssh localhost > >>>>>>>> The authenticity of host 'localhost (127.0.0.1)' can't be > >>>>>>>> established. > >>>>>>>> RSA key fingerprint is > >>>>>>>> 4f:a1:ff:ed:0c:46:3e:a9:8c:97:bc:b7:46:3e:35:d2. > >>>>>>>> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > >>>>>>>> Warning: Permanently added 'localhost' (RSA) to the list of known > >>>>>>>> hosts. > >>>>>>>> xxx@localhost's password: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > > --0016364ecd80993093046e028f26-- From general-return-344-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 06:28:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10713 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 06:28:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 06:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 6877 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 06:28:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6805 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 06:28:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6795 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 06:28:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:28:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:28:15 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1327305wfg.2 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:27:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bXQlFRYeFPCFcxroyH8o9ZkmIkherWjAH+aYmqv7nbs=; b=t8XfUcTqU3Xa3tE+GgwZTzZvt3BzGk88D1kYz1ZGRvniKcW29Sb7sUboTlgP6n3ukn D5pkGm3VIcsgPC2q6ZoEd+NehwvYvxp4Q0PKbvO1zGoc66Xq3Ka9vTF0QBTI777PuiMF puEngqYM/6OyJRaGvSzKudPWstal36nVs8RH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mMHFFBJVVLMIZvwrRyFXpgag6w1mRk8r7xabD1tRl5qWjUmUToGzyxVQkkF0Os3xTO r6pNZeVdTRHedxjpdgt11BWr6R0Q5/c5E4zh3SFjLzhq8pgQlfDOUzL8jajlIIb1lEtc XN6C6yiK2BxF6suCU/KRLEPMM/UkYPEzav3q8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.125.8 with SMTP id x8mr1309406wfc.44.1246861674456; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:27:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <702261350907052213u6b13190ap35ebc1df2c206d3b@mail.gmail.com> References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <4A4B8B99.10303@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030745g19ef2593o457f48972ef51ea@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907052213u6b13190ap35ebc1df2c206d3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:27:54 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, fred wang wrote: > it doesn't work.. Yes, it does. 10 years already and for everybody. http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~mdeters/how-to/ssh/ -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-345-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 07:35:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25292 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 07:35:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 07:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 40994 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 07:35:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40925 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 07:35:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40915 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 07:35:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:35:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xinejar22@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.153] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:35:02 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so652890fgb.12 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:34:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=+FhoBqr4ckk5/QUwUAdiMJDmdK3rbofkiR3HxFBkgJ0=; b=c5OqJbG+QJlN2jR9HUjo906iGyhnl42mo91Ai+fd3V9mlRyCYTksbNdyW2ynGe3Q/S NZaqM6ZYGLVJhLmUaj9/Ycevn3qZVjqLyN7w/+HamzctyZxxwPtZoUyVzyvt4Gd71N8D NNilyAvpOqrgXeQBWN9SPRT0rVayPvoEAcph8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=n45BcbRba7/KBS6u/dNcV8jZNd1tCm9hIrG12tMWnyZqdmWXbZlJE2rJqnq97d+vEG NtqRSy0JRUxXI7o03RW/L28Zln4caTTNVQvcOQd9rqJyiM7mphCfjhteqsM5NIk0JKvR iNh7nZvKiN9++OyI3KTWooybF8dj/4eQodDO4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.68.18 with SMTP id q18mr1950359fga.68.1246865678722; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:34:38 +0200 Message-ID: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> Subject: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: Xine Jar To: general@hadoop.apache.org, xinejar22@googlemail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2431cdce6fd046e048930 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2431cdce6fd046e048930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit *Hallo, I am using Hadoop 0.18.3 on a cluster of three linux machines. The jobtracker and the namenode cannot be started. I have copied the log files and the configuration file. Can someone help?* *Jobtracker log file *2009-07-03 17:34:09,315 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting JobTracker STARTUP_MSG: host = alshain/134.130.222.20 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.18.3 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/branch-0.18 -r 736250; compiled by 'ndaley' on Thu Jan 22 23:12:08 UTC 2009 ************************************************************/ 2009-07-03 17:34:09,429 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: java.net.BindException: Problem binding to albali.mobnets.RWTH-Aachen.DE/134.130.222.18:9001 : Cannot assign requested address at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:170) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:233) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:953) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.(RPC.java:465) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getServer(RPC.java:427) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:659) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:131) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:2373) Caused by: java.net.BindException: Cannot assign requested address at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:119) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:168) ... 7 more 2009-07-03 17:34:09,430 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down JobTracker at alshain/134.130.222.20 ************************************************************/ *Namenode log file* STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = alshain/134.130.222.20 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.18.3 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/branch-0.18 -r 736250; compiled by 'ndaley' on Thu Jan 22 23:12:08 UTC 2009 ************************************************************/ 2009-07-03 17:33:23,246 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=NameNode, port=9000 2009-07-03 17:33:23,284 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode: Namenode up at: alshain.mobnets.rwth-aachen.de/134.130.222.20:9000 2009-07-03 17:33:23,287 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=NameNode, sessionId=null 2009-07-03 17:33:23,291 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2009-07-03 17:33:23,355 INFO org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=root,root 2009-07-03 17:33:23,355 INFO org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup 2009-07-03 17:33:23,355 INFO org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true 2009-07-03 17:33:23,361 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2009-07-03 17:33:23,362 INFO org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2009-07-03 17:33:23,393 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed. java.io.IOException: NameNode is not formatted. at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage.java:243) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.java:80) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem.java:294) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:273) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:148) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.(NameNode.java:193) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.(NameNode.java:179) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:830) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:839) 2009-07-03 17:33:23,394 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Stopping server on 9000 2009-07-03 17:33:23,394 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode: java.io.IOException: NameNode is not formatted. at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage.java:243) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.java:80) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem.java:294) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:273) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:148) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.(NameNode.java:193) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.(NameNode.java:179) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:830) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:839) 2009-07-03 17:33:23,395 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at alshain/134.130.222.20 ************************************************************/ *Hadoop-site.xml * fs.default.name hdfs://134.130.222.20:9000/ mapred.job.tracker 134.130.222.18:9001 dfs.name.dir /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina dfs.data.dir /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina mapred.system.dir systemtina mapred.local.dir /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina *Thank you, CJ* --000e0cd2431cdce6fd046e048930-- From general-return-346-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 08:12:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35979 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 08:12:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 08:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 66529 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 08:12:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66455 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 08:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66445 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 08:12:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:12:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:12:01 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so3333955pzk.5 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N82nHSrwiR5if1gxMFFom+jEEF4bcYh1AmoXwr8BhBk=; b=J1cg0jR8AYBdfOAH/wpWrG7lp2Jt7NXjiTbjoZSwypDwFyTeVo0vhCdpvVO2u8dw53 f8mFwhAb48CLJhFSxmFdHSuydhiOXmlAKZe/fXWavMI46Zy5bAGwwDOFnUAxp6fl9s+q KkOwVsBQGNumNfpM6wXIQu6qiMkTH1je1KCbA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DMbrKn6fEjtOAWqPq8yf9KdiTR1t5ujdf3uFcXGC53uYPM7MwvpSyMNAzLaus7u0/l 3uGfrTegrgOi7ZlFxy0yHrbOk4e0FrELKh20/0JmjeeFPDyI7dqe9x+gFXBes7d1OdNO +EyUZrCUeaXX9lZ9IhzGsOW6jsqCb+CDKblzQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.7 with SMTP id 7mr1274953wfl.11.1246867901617; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:11:41 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: xinejar22@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Xine Jar wrote: > Caused by: java.net.BindException: Cannot assign requested address See? That's why. 1. Make sure localhost loopback was not screwed (i.e. socket configuration has not been removed from the IP for the system that is showing you this error). 2. Make sure you've disabled IPv6 (either -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue or other way) and you're not suffering from this bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D6226918 3. Make sure none of instances is running on the same address =E2=80=94 jus= t in case... :-) --=20 Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-347-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 02:47:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10849 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 02:47:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 02:47:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 95819 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 02:47:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95735 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 02:47:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95725 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 02:47:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:47:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:47:48 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1546625wfg.2 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xi8M00zvH/45vyuvzDmosviW8t9Bnx5kdNzyn3elyNM=; b=JRqmEHO1jHbhlUvrfs1kEvj4qQcrvzP4IVk/3MaTN+EymOF4pQUYf7/tFzVGM7kMFU U6iJ8oj900zFm+5GofK9I2pJ3OaTtssWvdK+Y+s8i6bkiI4QkqraP1ucV5w0KbDw25l1 PrsfhEMz2aSueJFaF+xc+vdOyL4x27bUQDtIk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aZIN2WZ8oq0mBJar3YYViCCiDziwSpUOyUlkZNP7VyC1cwkjI+xs/xeBevGPE5onHu Ca93mBW9MFHKdDw+fSck75FYf/JqGEeKSvhOX1xZq4VS0ksal7ssTIQTk313r59wJEVE hcYZHVJdmmNWxSaBwd8iF010EiYLXl5+q8Rz4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.7 with SMTP id 7mr1623753wfl.11.1246934846739; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:47:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:47:26 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Xine Jar wrote: > 2.How can I check that ipv6 is really disabled on my JVM? You've mentioned it is Linux, but how do I know what distribution of Linux's zoo you use? On Ubuntu it is sort of like this: In the file "/etc/modprobe.d/aliases" find "alias net-pf-10 ipv6", remove it and add the following: alias net-pf-10 off alias ipv6 off Then reboot (welcome to the Linux). On RedHat and derivatives it is like this: echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> =C2=A0/etc/modprobe.conf Then reboot (insert your ironic joke here). :-) > and in which file=C2=A0can I insert the flag -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack= =3Dtrue? It is just a JVM parameter for a networking: 1. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html 2. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/#ipv6-networkin= g See $HADOOP/conf/hadoop-env.sh and look for HADOOP_OPTS that is commented out by default. -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-348-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 13:33:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5662 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 13:33:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 13:33:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 32479 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 13:33:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32440 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 13:33:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32430 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 13:33:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:33:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.220] (HELO mail-fx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.220.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:33:49 +0000 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so5001478fxm.29 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:33:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YAzy8ZNI7pj79DZsnl/OoGN4vrtJI/uMrL14L4E0w8k=; b=PcPbGi6BUD2uWSoqpv9Ra2itRzjks6iRiNkfeWTPQKqemVDLcQogAxfSacTKrZl1ge D7HY+eo9u4iQ+Cq8N3KswXZO/MUXBIOcXXx4OZRedu3fVxoj1E6upvtVzIJ0SkPd9rMp zkyYYReuLeaPEPFl2uzeMeREl+qW5nAL8HlYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FbA9agbdY4L+ETQEuEvvRIoqCtHZrXnmHBY3zHH1cZa5T4sQi1fbxcLzLBrRdCZOuz 8UA5sb9KcwFwUf3Y/YahWLR3bKSlSOCCJKKoT2QGbv39T1T2E7woLkVAQAbyvgcnGUm0 XOFNi3FKxBgvN3NFuH8yGzoHLMpbMIY4HRXPg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tom.e.white@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.39.17 with SMTP id r17mr3322555muj.75.1246973609299; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:33:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:33:29 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bf1ada7a01b399b1 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.2 (candidate 0) From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please download and test this Hadoop 0.19.2 release candidate, and vote on common-dev. Thanks, Tom ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tom White Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:44 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Hadoop 0.19.2 (candidate 0) To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.19.2. This fixes 42 issues in 0.19.1 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&pid=12310240&fixfor=12313650). *** Please download, test and vote before the *** vote closes on Friday, July 3. http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/hadoop-0.19.2-candidate-0/ Cheers, Tom From general-return-349-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 02:53:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42437 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 02:53:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 02:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 98691 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 02:53:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98602 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 02:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98592 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 02:53:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:53:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:53:03 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so4465839pzk.5 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:52:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z3MVJ1W2yw2TsaLIIOEqzM9TMQO7QznIWPhoz9wOUKc=; b=P1fHBgrDW3/6eBZLhtGdqckk+kujdmHsWby3XelleRclb2XHROIBqv47B6Qpg5LUzH aYfICVFrssqOmRTZ2cdQTxCXA4LEDp/DuTtiy5UidR5zI7svDd4z2jZJ8r6LLF/aQC9y 7zTy52H2FFXDHSUrzz4SlxgyWUTc7DMmi5e0Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kr0h/7gmhNSmUhr3k6v9hzyTpiAxAsR+8eI8J5AtD/fqSoysY91X9hSbgRsjJigJCi QyOTPRCkrviYCas435KCutfLHztCfz2a6MgmC8RzvURGt9sep+3i+lhOch/3o7t3TKFl ww3dCd9VlAReU8ztY8fMqlAF7Agj+11kr60NM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.135.16 with SMTP id i16mr2173263wfd.315.1247021562767; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:52:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <702261350907010735u3502197au800281a5a131d963@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012211r17dec368u17e18052383a8822@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C430F.7080306@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907012251s41b18b24m5dc54015007d494e@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907012309l4c62885bk6df2ebac8e2b7254@mail.gmail.com> <4A4CDF0F.2040106@yahoo-inc.com> <702261350907030731w694cd855safc8b3e5b5048747@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0907030745g19ef2593o457f48972ef51ea@mail.gmail.com> <702261350907052213u6b13190ap35ebc1df2c206d3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:52:42 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350907071952t541131efyd0bfd8448c0ffb5e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: fail to setup passphraseless ssh and need some help From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3287246a893046e28d5cd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3287246a893046e28d5cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Maybe there is something wrong with the authority. I installed a new Ubuntu and it works. Thanks to those who have helped. On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, fred wang wrote: > > it doesn't work.. > > Yes, it does. 10 years already and for everybody. > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~mdeters/how-to/ssh/ > > -- > Kind regards, BM > > Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > --000e0cd3287246a893046e28d5cd-- From general-return-350-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 09:13:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69467 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 09:13:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 09:13:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 47637 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47562 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47552 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 09:13:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:13:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xinejar22@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:12:59 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1095431fgb.12 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9K5dquAjgF6T7C7iJtB1yLXKMAJSkLMDo3rE81adUo8=; b=AoPtmVX5cU/g/sHf17dbUFqt/RAbZ2JhE4RKoOUHbkmGmspEc872n7tD6jBeUpiLCt z4TijLnTTIiYSL5YZlKAefRHDiJPekCYwZyzlraoxI5Fr09+iq8ZGc8c1XNH2JsrXY/r Q8lMBvGCTFaa1shavtkITxn0S8sSasLxVCrHg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J5O4rwqYg6genbf+gEoFNfACv/3/hhs7a7NvLVqOqQgrduHcufflBTN93hfC4q96LK ezt3cAsp7r9NdEQjVOcoVOImggJgnIBIYy9IRiE2hLrb+ck/g5iNWCYh6MuEKS/1393q qhf6LLwopFPNzQXAro00IqB6FiJKQsA4O/kIs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.90.13 with SMTP id n13mr2812305fgb.45.1247044358576; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:12:38 +0200 Message-ID: <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: Xine Jar To: general@hadoop.apache.org, xinejar22@googlemail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd24a0c031b3a046e2e24f8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd24a0c031b3a046e2e24f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo, I am still struggling with the same problem. In order to be sure that IPv6 is not creating a problem and that the JVM is not suffering from a bug, I have written a TCP client/server program in Java, I let the server run on the same machine that was creating the binding problem and using the same port number. Luckily or unfortunately, the Java server could bind the address normally to the port, the communication between the client and the server was successful, and the netstat command shows that the port is used. I order to be sure that the problem is not a bug for hadoop I have installed the version 0.20.0, copied the same configuration and still have the same problem. *I have few questions: * As I have previously mentioned, the namenode cannot be started and java complains that the node has not been formated. The other problem is with the jobtracker which is giving a binding error on the address:port. *Q1:* Is it possible that the second problem (jobtracker problem) is appearing because of the namenode problem? If it is a yes, how can I solve this? I have actually deleted the /tmp folder and reformated the node but the formatting error persists!! Do I have to do something else? If it is a no, am I doing something stupid here in any of the configuration files?!!! *Q2: *In order to kill all the instances of the dfs and the mapred, is it enough to execute the bin/stop-dfs.sh and bin/stop-mapred.sh on the namenode? Is it possible that the command line is showing that there is no jobtracker, no namenode, ...... but in fact the port is occupied? P.S: -Whether hadoop is running or not, the netstat command is showing always that the port is free!!!!! - My OS is a openSuse 9* *I am trying to debug everything, because I am somehow sick of it, It is certainly something stupid and most probably my fault (or my configuration or my way of running things) , since others managed to run hadoop on a cluster. I would appreciate any idea that helps to discover this the problem. Thank you, CJ On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Xine Jar wrote: > > 2.How can I check that ipv6 is really disabled on my JVM? > > You've mentioned it is Linux, but how do I know what distribution of > Linux's zoo you use? > > On Ubuntu it is sort of like this: > In the file "/etc/modprobe.d/aliases" find "alias net-pf-10 ipv6", > remove it and add the following: > > alias net-pf-10 off > alias ipv6 off > > Then reboot (welcome to the Linux). > > On RedHat and derivatives it is like this: > echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> /etc/modprobe.conf > > Then reboot (insert your ironic joke here). :-) > > > > and in which file can I insert the flag -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true? > It is just a JVM parameter for a networking: > 1. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html > 2. > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/#ipv6-networking > > See $HADOOP/conf/hadoop-env.sh and look for HADOOP_OPTS that is > commented out by default. > > -- > Kind regards, BM > > Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > --000e0cd24a0c031b3a046e2e24f8-- From general-return-351-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 12:06:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10242 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 12:06:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 12:06:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 53887 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 12:07:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53834 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 12:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53824 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 12:07:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:07:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saurabhnanda@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-vw0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:06:52 +0000 Received: by vwj34 with SMTP id 34so503196vwj.5 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=K8IAh/KONyHI1fGgIyq05NbyEHLSH6zg7guDI39Pyzc=; b=BVB14axgQKa6pSYvz7NVWDFMQSnw/yQO0odZwwzMZBZvvA6uwkpRAe2ZaUyqsnNERU FH8qKDjceL9d5gJ8VN54+R3/CQ1m0Sy6FDE9hfd6Dho2FPQ/IDYAp0gJAtknT6Yc/VUv DFlUbMD13Xr8s1t+AnryKnp+RhKQhPkG+TA9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gNoF/7r/lxXPzBZN0QUTuiB8pt4qfuB90uA6Jt/iFHum2i/ICDZSIW3Oifg/ZlTkSn x+yU0Ruk9N2WqgHSV34uNIG7hr6FixnaSKhF3/TcH5pstiApoR1/iBpw2KAHiQIyOl6J lw9wcDWuwyFEgsArmTLCwL9Y8RK7wSqg7f340= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.74.85 with SMTP id t21mr13951979vcj.75.1247054791804; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:36:31 +0530 Message-ID: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Wrong FS error From: Saurabh Nanda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed584e18b55046e3091ce X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ed584e18b55046e3091ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, A lot of my Hadop jobs (actually Cloudbase queries) are showing the following kind of errors in the job tracker: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: hdfs://master-hadoop.local/user/ct-admin/cloudbase/index/UID_INDEX/index_new/metadata/1, expected: hdfs://master-hadoop My configuration is: * master-hadoop: a machine running the datanode & job tracker * slave1-hadoop: a slave (running the task tracker, right?) All of my map jobs on the slave1-hadoop are failing with the error given above. Nowhere in my configuration file have I specified master-hadoop or master-hadoop.local. I have always used external IP addresses. Any help will be highly appreciated. I'm on Hadoop 0.18.3 Thanks, Saurabh. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com http://foodieforlife.blogspot.com --0016364ed584e18b55046e3091ce-- From general-return-352-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 13:14:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40036 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 13:14:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 13:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 51820 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51731 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51721 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 13:14:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xinejar22@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:14:43 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1134462fgb.12 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:14:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=17lFI+MsWAcxNFI5f1JPFAFGbNJfbnbrwzuzgE7o2tI=; b=uMvSVcfOowiP3i1mCMlOKh8lupGVarlZQN9fG2sJ/K8ZSU2lz9LK2qmQhpPU/GNk4g W63lPBLjlqk2zS6qlgsxPEIv2swVfC0dEQVqmnMQJ73iXDWKoYLIb40EK520CxEZdFOx qdsXzy7kBXVGeztPAHzNFVZQ8xXP1x7WvsSLo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dVl5Fo+l2WuIXwWY7V0lP8/BErpQwipTpbtRmZm6Bzg+IFODyzm00C6kr1w2Eixa/B UBEpu06cV2Y4GC1o175aJh6R4WgRQsbKOa685wfcdLPnUK3DRqUhbQrnHMlHrsZtJDiZ +hHwPszoxkAzoLN75rIkWB9yQcWJP3m3rC9m0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.98.16 with SMTP id v16mr2842110fgb.40.1247058862199; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:14:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:14:22 +0200 Message-ID: <115373b00907080614k7c8cb98eq9ed056ef47b64758@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: Xine Jar To: general@hadoop.apache.org, xinejar22@googlemail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd24d747ed667046e318487 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd24d747ed667046e318487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you all for your great help, I finally discovered a typing error in one of my configuration files. Therefore my jobtracker was not able to bind the address to the port. On the other hand I still have the Namenode which cannot be started. The log file shows that the namenode is not formatted although I did this. I appreciate it if someone can point to me the folders I can delete in order to be able to reformat the node without deleting some critical information. please note that I have deleted once the /tmp folder and tried to reformat but this did not help !! Vielen Dank, CJ On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Xine Jar wrote: > Hallo, > I am still struggling with the same problem. In order to be sure that IPv6 > is not creating a problem and that the JVM is not suffering from a bug, I > have written a TCP client/server program in Java, I let the server run on > the same machine that was creating the binding problem and using the same > port number. Luckily or unfortunately, the Java server could bind the > address normally to the port, the communication between the client and the > server was successful, and the netstat command shows that the port is used. > > I order to be sure that the problem is not a bug for hadoop I have > installed the version 0.20.0, > copied the same configuration and still have the same problem. > > *I have few questions: * > As I have previously mentioned, the namenode cannot be started and java > complains that the node has not been formated. The other problem is with the > jobtracker which is giving a binding error on the address:port. > > *Q1:* Is it possible that the second problem (jobtracker problem) is > appearing because of the namenode problem? > > If it is a yes, how can I solve this? I have actually deleted the /tmp > folder and reformated the node but the formatting error persists!! Do I have > to do something else? > > If it is a no, am I doing something stupid here in any of the > configuration files?!!! > > *Q2: *In order to kill all the instances of the dfs and the mapred, is it > enough to execute the bin/stop-dfs.sh and bin/stop-mapred.sh on the > namenode? Is it possible that the command line is showing that there is no > jobtracker, no namenode, ...... but in fact the port is occupied? > > P.S: -Whether hadoop is running or not, the netstat command is showing > always that the port > is free!!!!! > - My OS is a openSuse 9* > > *I am trying to debug everything, because I am somehow sick of it, It is > certainly something stupid and most probably my fault (or my configuration > or my way of running things) , since others managed to run hadoop on a > cluster. I would appreciate any idea that helps to discover this the > problem. > > Thank you, > CJ > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < > bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Xine Jar wrote: >> > 2.How can I check that ipv6 is really disabled on my JVM? >> >> You've mentioned it is Linux, but how do I know what distribution of >> Linux's zoo you use? >> >> On Ubuntu it is sort of like this: >> In the file "/etc/modprobe.d/aliases" find "alias net-pf-10 ipv6", >> remove it and add the following: >> >> alias net-pf-10 off >> alias ipv6 off >> >> Then reboot (welcome to the Linux). >> >> On RedHat and derivatives it is like this: >> echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> /etc/modprobe.conf >> >> Then reboot (insert your ironic joke here). :-) >> >> >> > and in which file can I insert the flag -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true? >> It is just a JVM parameter for a networking: >> 1. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html >> 2. >> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/#ipv6-networking >> >> See $HADOOP/conf/hadoop-env.sh and look for HADOOP_OPTS that is >> commented out by default. >> >> -- >> Kind regards, BM >> >> Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. >> > > --000e0cd24d747ed667046e318487-- From general-return-353-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 13:25:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49214 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 13:25:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 13:25:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 77561 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:26:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77501 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:26:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77491 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 13:26:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:26:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-vw0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:25:55 +0000 Received: by vwj34 with SMTP id 34so538832vwj.5 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:25:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=84mVGZxC2HUJDzqu8JIZc6v+CydieyTc5wr5TT3mdmU=; b=u6bwnNiJiMFRNvZErAA4196yOZZhFQEkjmhSfoOTqcsh3mSgVReCCzVbN6LC1Oe8wJ vOKcTUglwjkKwFJUMyPZ/qIV30VC5fJ82CYde+a+YYa2Klbk0dPtfC/d2Km1+d1Ee9yD a6iukvHkga3jWjp7Txn72fnpnfI368b0dTpYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OesVhUdfZ50FX5oo2nksBUJqYK5FAlg0H93KvKIrn7/QhuBlmibKkJygidh6tuyQfX ozDofzXhYSSHS8c+O9M0Tve3kImV680WFnM+5oGdxF05IDCXJTW22A3vpTSf7bHPLsIt ocSI7/PowVIbnu6KTMnzNIFlDnZV5zlrCXsio= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.77.17 with SMTP id e17mr14175649vck.3.1247059532924; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:25:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115373b00907080614k7c8cb98eq9ed056ef47b64758@mail.gmail.com> References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080614k7c8cb98eq9ed056ef47b64758@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:25:32 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690907080625q11360a8fhba59103f00a8aae1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: jason hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64eabf4794f08046e31acdc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64eabf4794f08046e31acdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You may need to delete the directory that you have configured for dfs storage on all of the machines in your cluster. The other issue that may happen is that the user that owns the Namenode/Datanode processes does not have write permissions on the filesystem structure to be used for dfs storage. Does the namenode format command complete successfully? On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Xine Jar wrote: > Thank you all for your great help, > > I finally discovered a typing error in one of my configuration files. > Therefore my jobtracker was not able to bind the address to the port. > > On the other hand I still have the Namenode which cannot be started. The > log > file shows that the namenode is not formatted although I did this. I > appreciate it if someone can point to me the folders I can delete in order > to be able to reformat the node without deleting some critical information. > please note that I have deleted once the /tmp folder and tried to reformat > but this did not help !! > > Vielen Dank, > CJ > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Xine Jar > wrote: > > > Hallo, > > I am still struggling with the same problem. In order to be sure that > IPv6 > > is not creating a problem and that the JVM is not suffering from a bug, I > > have written a TCP client/server program in Java, I let the server run on > > the same machine that was creating the binding problem and using the same > > port number. Luckily or unfortunately, the Java server could bind the > > address normally to the port, the communication between the client and > the > > server was successful, and the netstat command shows that the port is > used. > > > > I order to be sure that the problem is not a bug for hadoop I have > > installed the version 0.20.0, > > copied the same configuration and still have the same problem. > > > > *I have few questions: * > > As I have previously mentioned, the namenode cannot be started and java > > complains that the node has not been formated. The other problem is with > the > > jobtracker which is giving a binding error on the address:port. > > > > *Q1:* Is it possible that the second problem (jobtracker problem) is > > appearing because of the namenode problem? > > > > If it is a yes, how can I solve this? I have actually deleted the /tmp > > folder and reformated the node but the formatting error persists!! Do I > have > > to do something else? > > > > If it is a no, am I doing something stupid here in any of the > > configuration files?!!! > > > > *Q2: *In order to kill all the instances of the dfs and the mapred, is > it > > enough to execute the bin/stop-dfs.sh and bin/stop-mapred.sh on the > > namenode? Is it possible that the command line is showing that there is > no > > jobtracker, no namenode, ...... but in fact the port is occupied? > > > > P.S: -Whether hadoop is running or not, the netstat command is showing > > always that the port > > is free!!!!! > > - My OS is a openSuse 9* > > > > *I am trying to debug everything, because I am somehow sick of it, It is > > certainly something stupid and most probably my fault (or my > configuration > > or my way of running things) , since others managed to run hadoop on a > > cluster. I would appreciate any idea that helps to discover this the > > problem. > > > > Thank you, > > CJ > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < > > bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Xine Jar > wrote: > >> > 2.How can I check that ipv6 is really disabled on my JVM? > >> > >> You've mentioned it is Linux, but how do I know what distribution of > >> Linux's zoo you use? > >> > >> On Ubuntu it is sort of like this: > >> In the file "/etc/modprobe.d/aliases" find "alias net-pf-10 ipv6", > >> remove it and add the following: > >> > >> alias net-pf-10 off > >> alias ipv6 off > >> > >> Then reboot (welcome to the Linux). > >> > >> On RedHat and derivatives it is like this: > >> echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> /etc/modprobe.conf > >> > >> Then reboot (insert your ironic joke here). :-) > >> > >> > >> > and in which file can I insert the flag > -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true? > >> It is just a JVM parameter for a networking: > >> 1. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html > >> 2. > >> > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/#ipv6-networking > >> > >> See $HADOOP/conf/hadoop-env.sh and look for HADOOP_OPTS that is > >> commented out by default. > >> > >> -- > >> Kind regards, BM > >> > >> Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > >> > > > > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --0016e64eabf4794f08046e31acdc-- From general-return-354-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 15:11:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63258 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 15:11:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 15:11:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 97876 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97829 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:11:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97819 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 15:11:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:11:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xinejar22@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:11:37 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1158677fgb.12 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:11:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RZgZthw4YbGBHDGzdX1L0z0Dhi2rdFlZND3zjgHKly0=; b=qJiItuEhrBXetmr2O6co29TmtZ4wLelYrL1WWRybZ4OpT1IQPgA60E1M+fBpxSRmI0 HEx+FYUcG1v8drMNujRjVNejn49F5ytNOY4b91/PWiXx2Wgk8KThQc53AR5WmgUpNUSv 7oaSoTTfyxi7fm2Z5edZvWPMgHeo/g0+hjJrE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vlwC7bGqBzo8h1St1HHTG96E0pcYuFWMwjC/MwhW/wyRJfcC/08XK3Y3C6yrD33CQa BD4NBWXegoWiihcjIMcLblHdhxvUHs1HllbGODCgp3SLuPSt5av3stpnfwBF4xWC/DFB dfqtPIVUvoTT7Rk4SW9aycMPttrU5BuI78/vk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.74.1 with SMTP id w1mr2799106fga.76.1247065877399; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:11:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690907080625q11360a8fhba59103f00a8aae1@mail.gmail.com> References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080614k7c8cb98eq9ed056ef47b64758@mail.gmail.com> <314098690907080625q11360a8fhba59103f00a8aae1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:11:17 +0200 Message-ID: <115373b00907080811v2c29027cn7867f73137a55147@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: Xine Jar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd24e52a24b2d046e332620 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd24e52a24b2d046e332620 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Great thank you, I can see now that all the nodes started and I shall try to run the WordCount v1.0 example.Let' s see. I would also like to know in which case do you advice reformatting the node? Do I ever need to use this command again? and concerning the book is there a possibility to know roughly the table of content for each of the following books: ProHadoop, and Hadoop the definitive guide? As you see I am starting basically from 0 with hadoop and would like to reach at point where I can write my own java program/my own search query. Which of the books would you advice ? Thank you very much for your help On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:25 PM, jason hadoop wrote: > You may need to delete the directory that you have configured for dfs > storage on all of the machines in your cluster. > The other issue that may happen is that the user that owns the > Namenode/Datanode processes does not have write permissions on the > filesystem structure to be used for dfs storage. > > Does the namenode format command complete successfully? > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Xine Jar wrote: > > > Thank you all for your great help, > > > > I finally discovered a typing error in one of my configuration files. > > Therefore my jobtracker was not able to bind the address to the port. > > > > On the other hand I still have the Namenode which cannot be started. The > > log > > file shows that the namenode is not formatted although I did this. I > > appreciate it if someone can point to me the folders I can delete in > order > > to be able to reformat the node without deleting some critical > information. > > please note that I have deleted once the /tmp folder and tried to > reformat > > but this did not help !! > > > > Vielen Dank, > > CJ > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Xine Jar > > wrote: > > > > > Hallo, > > > I am still struggling with the same problem. In order to be sure that > > IPv6 > > > is not creating a problem and that the JVM is not suffering from a bug, > I > > > have written a TCP client/server program in Java, I let the server run > on > > > the same machine that was creating the binding problem and using the > same > > > port number. Luckily or unfortunately, the Java server could bind the > > > address normally to the port, the communication between the client and > > the > > > server was successful, and the netstat command shows that the port is > > used. > > > > > > I order to be sure that the problem is not a bug for hadoop I have > > > installed the version 0.20.0, > > > copied the same configuration and still have the same problem. > > > > > > *I have few questions: * > > > As I have previously mentioned, the namenode cannot be started and java > > > complains that the node has not been formated. The other problem is > with > > the > > > jobtracker which is giving a binding error on the address:port. > > > > > > *Q1:* Is it possible that the second problem (jobtracker problem) is > > > appearing because of the namenode problem? > > > > > > If it is a yes, how can I solve this? I have actually deleted the /tmp > > > folder and reformated the node but the formatting error persists!! Do I > > have > > > to do something else? > > > > > > If it is a no, am I doing something stupid here in any of the > > > configuration files?!!! > > > > > > *Q2: *In order to kill all the instances of the dfs and the mapred, is > > it > > > enough to execute the bin/stop-dfs.sh and bin/stop-mapred.sh on the > > > namenode? Is it possible that the command line is showing that there is > > no > > > jobtracker, no namenode, ...... but in fact the port is occupied? > > > > > > P.S: -Whether hadoop is running or not, the netstat command is showing > > > always that the port > > > is free!!!!! > > > - My OS is a openSuse 9* > > > > > > *I am trying to debug everything, because I am somehow sick of it, It > is > > > certainly something stupid and most probably my fault (or my > > configuration > > > or my way of running things) , since others managed to run hadoop on a > > > cluster. I would appreciate any idea that helps to discover this the > > > problem. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > CJ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk < > > > bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Xine Jar > > wrote: > > >> > 2.How can I check that ipv6 is really disabled on my JVM? > > >> > > >> You've mentioned it is Linux, but how do I know what distribution of > > >> Linux's zoo you use? > > >> > > >> On Ubuntu it is sort of like this: > > >> In the file "/etc/modprobe.d/aliases" find "alias net-pf-10 ipv6", > > >> remove it and add the following: > > >> > > >> alias net-pf-10 off > > >> alias ipv6 off > > >> > > >> Then reboot (welcome to the Linux). > > >> > > >> On RedHat and derivatives it is like this: > > >> echo "alias net-pf-10 off" >> /etc/modprobe.conf > > >> > > >> Then reboot (insert your ironic joke here). :-) > > >> > > >> > > >> > and in which file can I insert the flag > > -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true? > > >> It is just a JVM parameter for a networking: > > >> 1. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/properties.html > > >> 2. > > >> > > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/net/ipv6_guide/#ipv6-networking > > >> > > >> See $HADOOP/conf/hadoop-env.sh and look for HADOOP_OPTS that is > > >> commented out by default. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Kind regards, BM > > >> > > >> Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > --000e0cd24e52a24b2d046e332620-- From general-return-355-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 15:46:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39607 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 15:46:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 15:46:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 65978 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65918 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65908 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 15:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:46:20 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so376312pxi.5 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:46:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TGOt5dVUif1efWqJWTCIjEPAIxJKluXA8fs6BgtSNak=; b=NtupaPZHr0jSJ/2Czwksbj0D7n8dUPgx9o718o6ZKduP+rpnLmB/kg8UHFUD2ztX2Z 4kOrPwyWNso7P6JXjVxtrgxZiaG0vfF1A9hqpxpGRp5iAFJNWKtK5LGfGAZ7m8imJS/z 97EFLdlVSCkTO3mo6ptfDfwHAhHTN9lmM4bUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sqGoMjrn7Y1CjxCB8fcKQmgvJak7b+8zgMSTh7xX8uQJDy6zKw5PJdNySvhr5LvQMU Wz3DqEepsA34u3NUT6Bu3i12I4WUUt7Q7kQxwk4ldjfALxRgx++9D/IvtJQL5i0RGn+m tI+xHF8D1iTwDAdLuoIyJ1C+G3t59DcPdRMD0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.76.16 with SMTP id y16mr2373761wfa.346.1247067960434; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:46:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> References: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:46:00 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wrong FS error From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Saurabh Nanda wrote: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: > hdfs://master-hadoop.local/user/ct-admin/cloudbase/index/UID_INDEX/index_new/metadata/1, > expected: hdfs://master-hadoop Are you sure configs are OK? Looks like you add ".local" suffix on one node, and not on another... -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-356-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 15:48:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41003 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 15:48:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 15:48:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 67762 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67672 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 15:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67662 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 15:48:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:48:21 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1907802wfg.2 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8nwE70k/JXKOZAmkATL6azffK+eSJ6Nf2BWqu5hPiyA=; b=mxKCwsXNmfVrZF2S1rX1mf1lWF4Z5xPGTx1eo8ZzN/jzXUjSX6hp9Yvvzsu5aSTOB5 ghMEN2rMHgI75kEKRA+pGh/87wyXfrs//YEeIwocFEY22/De7ubzSwuE4JTVGqSWKQJh mBR4Vjj91sGyk3UjDpXSnktNnCJn8oxeZIf8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J6X+sfyEjIEhphZ3ajN4TXmQXpmYQU1CQNY48uTdRDDEEVpFM6umXYirbH9tj1/09C is3E1oZWg/LacOyeK1lKeZUdztlbtnpdJqwEnwV5JjBMH3Lu8huQavlZm0ddjvd7M6xg 2o9Xof+tOz72LUqofNG0tvrod7FEHZ+8fPR/4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.51.1 with SMTP id y1mr2577363wfy.237.1247068081224; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> References: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:48:01 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wrong FS error From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Saurabh Nanda wrote: > Hi, > > A lot of my Hadop jobs (actually Cloudbase queries) are showing the > following kind of errors in the job tracker: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: > hdfs://master-hadoop.local/user/ct-admin/cloudbase/index/UID_INDEX/index_new/metadata/1, > expected: hdfs://master-hadoop P.S. Sounds also like you have no DNS inside but using /etc/hosts that might be just wrong. Check host names on each and make sure nslookup shows you identical everywhere. Hope, this helps. -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-357-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 19:57:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21992 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 19:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 19:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 70976 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 19:57:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70766 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 19:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70726 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 19:57:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:57:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:57:44 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.225] (nat-dip10.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n68JvAZM090582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A54FA15.6000308@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:57:09 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.2.0. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. Key features of the 3.2.0 release: * client side bindings for; Perl, Python, & REST * flexible quorum support * re-usable recipe code libraries * chroot support in connect string * many fixes, improvements, improved documentation, etc... A number of optimizations have gone into this release and our benchmarks show that read/write performance of version 3.2.0 is approximately twice that of the previous 3.1.0 version! For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.2.0 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.2.0/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-358-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 04:15:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22452 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 04:15:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 04:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 28090 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 04:15:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27984 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 04:15:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27974 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 04:15:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:15:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saurabhnanda@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-vw0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:15:40 +0000 Received: by vwj34 with SMTP id 34so1058026vwj.5 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DXO1iQFsK50fPa8Vtd2gGvfBHXEaFGc6q2xY7NAtP+I=; b=qHz7w7+Lh2v37GlL8v5+FGsAD93HvF5ijXf96aMl+vhxo0QvlTjSRj/44+DHyCJG7b Vy8yhMcacmWmnID+doUea2pSpRitese2C4po/ARZRcd6c9TdDMFoap5Tw1hCd1q+I5gr yoC2lJtYTKmoDUpgtYyXYZ4gI0JRk5QFcoYhE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mWA2CJALY5oHQ7YrtTym0+eSyC0NcvuEpxdZ2JilAVDX3bQ9/cdHsUTVmbLJYLk4MR e0XhIGsfMsCPVsYHrb2dof4hbuDitjDHjXsrmiBS4DzDhVxZKA510XnpEho7pZMxHLqw OMgxB5O+anIGeFwpnpzC1UcqL3QboV69Fro5s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.81.70 with SMTP id w6mr438852vck.32.1247112918102; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:15:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:45:18 +0530 Message-ID: <794f042d0907082115q75692e5an527d4284eab61c83@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Wrong FS error From: Saurabh Nanda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e647f0267aa6d5046e3e1a51 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e647f0267aa6d5046e3e1a51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > A lot of my Hadop jobs (actually Cloudbase queries) are showing the > > following kind of errors in the job tracker: > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong FS: > > > hdfs://master-hadoop.local/user/ct-admin/cloudbase/index/UID_INDEX/index_new/metadata/1, > expected: hdfs://master-hadoop > > P.S. Sounds also like you have no DNS inside but using /etc/hosts that > might be just wrong. Check host names on each and make sure nslookup > shows you identical everywhere. You are right. I am using /etc/hosts and my hadoop machines do not have proper DNS entries. However, why should that matter if I am using IP address in the configuration files? Relevant entries from hadoop-site.xml: fs.default.name=hdfs://172.16.37.56:8020 mapred.job.tracker=172.16.37.56:8021 slaves.xml: 172.16.37.56 172.16.37.72 /etc/hosts on 172.16.37.56: 127.0.0.1 master-hadoop localhost.localdomain localhost 172.16.37.72 slave1-hadoop /etc/hosts on 172.16.37.72: 127.0.0.1 slave1-hadoop localhost.localdomain localhost 172.16.37.56 master-hadoop How should I go about fixing this? Saurabh. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com http://foodieforlife.blogspot.com --0016e647f0267aa6d5046e3e1a51-- From general-return-359-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:45:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93123 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:45:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:45:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 73881 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:45:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73786 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:45:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73769 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:45:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:45:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:45:39 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so13163eyf.9 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:45:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AqGjcHlJgOifblh74l/falRXNH6D7YqWWSOvV7NmiyM=; b=Gyah9NpKxnJArHQ7KP9clsvjY9ZE7G9Dhiwbs9gss/drovgyZY8DyMSMR0YSzxXkJW q16uRGEIo4JGX/plYk0oUJP52YZ3qSbcBEBwt7Kn+Ta+VLlPmODvGVIdVN6GBwjZU4gr 8bJm/HcP5bFC9+wb8BIWxUXkedBZmPOTO1rf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NNp71RrJb/Sk31Gvm49aYfgC+Sdfm9r3jTgHW7EUx7YW4DbRuoT0KsGhDmwnLGRHtN FLkG0WmXEi4JbAr54cS5DgYKeRlJpbA1/dNHV0xsjEBpN9ThGPO85SA99dFvsVTsWCTW s7b5aabPTmixIaxiq0OjSgLzW3zOns6AohtDA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.110.5 with SMTP id i5mr727117ebc.3.1247132718417; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:45:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <794f042d0907082115q75692e5an527d4284eab61c83@mail.gmail.com> References: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> <794f042d0907082115q75692e5an527d4284eab61c83@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:45:17 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wrong FS error From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Saurabh Nanda wrote= : > You are right. I am using /etc/hosts and my hadoop machines do not have > proper DNS entries. However, why should that matter if I am using IP addr= ess > in the configuration files? Sorry, after I've posted, I found that it was not precisely correct. :-) What I wanted to say is that your /etc/hosts might be configured different on machines. > Relevant entries from hadoop-site.xml: > fs.default.name=3Dhdfs://172.16.37.56:8020 > mapred.job.tracker=3D172.16.37.56:8021 Well, if you use /etc/hosts, why you bother with IP addresses then? > slaves.xml: > 172.16.37.56 > 172.16.37.72 Same here. Use host names instead and make sure they are resolved in both way correctly. For example, "nslookup master-hadoop.local" should return you "172.16.37.56", but "nslookup 172.16.37.56" should give you "master-hadoop.local". Same for slave. > /etc/hosts on 172.16.37.56: > 127.0.0.1 =C2=A0 =C2=A0master-hadoop =C2=A0 =C2=A0localhost.localdomain = =C2=A0 =C2=A0localhost > 172.16.37.72 slave1-hadoop > > /etc/hosts on 172.16.37.72: > 127.0.0.1 =C2=A0 =C2=A0slave1-hadoop =C2=A0 =C2=A0localhost.localdomain = =C2=A0 =C2=A0localhost > 172.16.37.56 master-hadoop > > How should I go about fixing this? Well, they are wrong anyway. For the start, remove "*-hadoop" from 127.0.0.1 on both machines and RTFM about /etc/hosts here: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/tools/man-cgi?hosts+5 I would suggest you to go with something like this: On 172.16.37.72 should be: -------------------------------------- 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.16.37.56 master-hadoop.local master-hadoop On 172.16.37.56 should be: -------------------------------------- 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.16.37.72 slave1-hadoop.local slave1-hadoop Are there some more slaves? They have to be managed in the same way. P.S. It is difficult to manage /etc/hosts and you'd better switch to local DNS instead. --=20 Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-360-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:49:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95701 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:49:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:49:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 78639 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:50:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78567 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78556 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:50:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.25] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:49:53 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so13590eyf.9 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IVaGbJpp1bVl6nqIuGaXpNp8AQpBSZjZthkcf+7mkgw=; b=uoHLrsMihhZW5NEJahwMZHV6NZd4/yzMFKXF9caJXfuQB0WUUnK7xu+Fe1lAb+78Ym GlSozFbMvpSV+fX5e7Gcek0ZjKO+MgDWYo0lOLIRNuY4WuzRsQJkNDiR+/b2Nv1lJD/c IwzljCSGhcCci9pNGJxazbh4KnCykSN6OS1FA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CLzMMV94ResSlLKdA37M21QHRU5KXc9jEzDREXAPbelm+sHPSRLPtIErKgLI4hGeT+ y/B4JADBHsEgEdkXGGGFXeU8IF6XddCSOOHWYQLEO6it4N1j7tZ+6FWjfVL5joVkRb7L 6CwEnnCYw6bS3CtojRWVMXyzskb4Z0OQLnLdc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.17.2 with SMTP id 2mr707512ebq.26.1247132973487; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <115373b00907080811v2c29027cn7867f73137a55147@mail.gmail.com> References: <115373b00907060034t170c14afmb3aef33260424a75@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907060524p1fcb996cq2bbb86c2fe85bd5a@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080212n12ae70d6oc3a9c7a3c2a02fbd@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080614k7c8cb98eq9ed056ef47b64758@mail.gmail.com> <314098690907080625q11360a8fhba59103f00a8aae1@mail.gmail.com> <115373b00907080811v2c29027cn7867f73137a55147@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:49:33 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with starting the Jobtracker and thenamenode From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Xine Jar wrote: > Which of the books would you advice ? google... :-) -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-361-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 10:31:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16815 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 10:31:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 10:31:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 33423 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 10:31:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33364 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 10:31:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33354 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 10:31:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:31:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.206] (HELO mail-bw0-f206.google.com) (209.85.218.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:31:22 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so59369bwz.29 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:31:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hGk+w42xhxpXXabFyZU17kJMno33yWAQebcVGB8PhGk=; b=PJoELbzZEHNgz2LqRKkozkWySgPUWsEf4ATGAOrV3vQ6fxoFbiYzV6aGcc7raTbCdN dYIo+GOsRDUu973sWcAIvdZjj0haaAFtLWXi5T8zj5s5wffHIfS+Cbw7jgS52fyqjuIM nOJKun3n1i4DSEAQZx7304xLdiD1i3qEMiK6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sKb/WgVytiu8eiUrRbR1UEJAwLQE/WN3Crxzz2/yIVqftuxr97vVXNyci5NlHEwq+S Gb5oEfkZzg2sF7MpS6udLfn55zv8B4rbFnFUBL4vfMdv5Q+1zocdAdw05zGKH1KRuShC 2/0l1ecCOadIom7Gvi4O9TkJl22sy2g27rum0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.68.10 with SMTP id t10mr557196bki.182.1247135462287; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:31:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Just to say thanks From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bb93376a18046e435a57 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5bb93376a18046e435a57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just moved one of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around and compare results from our traditional methods. Wow ! All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward this project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just like it more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get into Hive. Cheers all and have fun! Nico --001636c5bb93376a18046e435a57-- From general-return-362-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 17:25:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94824 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 17:25:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 17:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 68692 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68621 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:25:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68532 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 17:25:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:25:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil123@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:25:50 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so462058yxe.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IE65UG/UUHasaXlDhzQlKdFNMGDiA4pojAQ3XzuAO3Q=; b=sBnYtdRkED8XAlWqSS6DOn2DL6Ah1tYgRkwXJrh63V29a8929vNtq/RLzP/J9HEU32 Fn9Op/myTTRjb6ak+1a4ewXD93u2kCXECxoVqH3dY7S9FFsoD6ZVlJ3ERR/1/nx4lDur i5e4cA6YSewFvjmQSsLoVzCysHuMfdvsF4yEA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DgGV3TcGa8YtDQKBG8KmAYV6JFn8q+wq8EP5kCs068TXhAqSmlw3CCOvMPBP6lLRG/ lvA/v5VBxciWTc9b9lIymSs0U/HuobimDrIECTEN6MfBOzVuMAfRprGyl7fpn5Kz5ITQ STSCJgKYVBq34RCswExv+ZaNK5ecOPEcCPUjk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.138.7 with SMTP id l7mr1383021and.141.1247160329369; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:25:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:25:29 -0700 Message-ID: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Just to say thanks From: Phil Whelan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Nico, It sounds like you are just ahead of me. We are looking at doing exactly the same thing right now. Any tips? Thanks, Phil On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: > Hi, > > I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just moved one > of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around and compare > results from our traditional methods. > > Wow ! > > All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward this > project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. > > I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just like it > more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get into Hive. > > Cheers all and have fun! > > Nico > -- Mobile: +1 778-233-4935 Twitter: philwhln Email : phil123@gmail.com From general-return-363-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 21:07:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25333 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 21:07:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 21:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 72553 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 21:07:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72486 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 21:07:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72476 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 21:07:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:07:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.206] (HELO mail-bw0-f206.google.com) (209.85.218.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:07:23 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so449321bwz.29 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z6051KDFxVPECD5wTiTTsOxLbOi8Xps/PN6R6FRdnmo=; b=OFW07+YaO+WiiP75LFQuzXrjC8QNWou4dbkG7hC+ydep/Wn4quYLbdK/vgp+mDbIif AB8a6tTxv6qWiLYKdMvi9e4O10aSjG3D+VeBbHdemKOI4Sqr/pmekjzzZ4ln1l/LQ2zy /FU1VbWmT1VRRH/BpHDDvqnGc2ZU5p/2sns1A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sLJ/FTeGYZoM0bdSbcR0NbdaS/9kvqSIivRK7KZBrsRoaj1Td/71cfu7Pn4FPpYt/P sz4+LACkmjJPNY7Vk6vh20KWMB+5JssvUX13aR4Se766RmCjQxh8EAkzdVRiq0nBDXQB S6Zdnur8F26iMy0QjsvE2iS2U2UnNNTk6XieI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.70.135 with SMTP id d7mr1091868bkj.194.1247173622352; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> References: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:07:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Just to say thanks From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a9e8bc19fe046e4c3cc4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a9e8bc19fe046e4c3cc4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi I basically followed the samples on: - http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Single-Node_Cluster) - http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) The only difference was that I work on CentOS 5.3 64bit - but that did not change much. I also used JDK 6 update 14 ( http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/?intcmp=1281). My scripts, however, is not yet Java based. In stead I used the streaming solution and do my scripts in Perl. I used http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Writing_An_Hadoop_MapReduce_Program_In_Pythonas guide (some modification was required, for example "contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.19.1-streaming.jar" changed to "contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.0-streaming.jar". The rest of the config help I got from the documentation. Lessons learned so far: - To make life simple, use identical setup on all nodes (data directory location, file locations etc.) - Scripts need to be present on all nodes (obvious, but I missed that) Current benchmarks put my 3 node cluster at 3.2 times faster - and this also takes into account the additional time it took to upload the data in Hadoop and download the results again. Hope that helps. I am hoping to write a more general Apache log parser and share my experiences. Just busy with the script fine tuning. Cheers Nico PS: a little off topic, but I just need to ask quickly: do we reply top or bottom on this list? On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Phil Whelan wrote: > Hi Nico, > > It sounds like you are just ahead of me. We are looking at doing > exactly the same thing right now. Any tips? > > Thanks, > Phil > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just moved > one > > of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around and > compare > > results from our traditional methods. > > > > Wow ! > > > > All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward this > > project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. > > > > I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just like > it > > more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get into > Hive. > > > > Cheers all and have fun! > > > > Nico > > > > > > -- > Mobile: +1 778-233-4935 > Twitter: philwhln > Email : phil123@gmail.com > --001636c5a9e8bc19fe046e4c3cc4-- From general-return-364-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 04:10:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17310 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 04:10:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 04:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 20474 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:10:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20361 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:10:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20351 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 04:10:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:10:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.146.178] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:10:10 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j32so94621waf.29 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.125.15 with SMTP id x15mr2470601wac.217.1247198988422; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n33sm923995wag.21.2009.07.09.21.09.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A56BEB2.2080503@cloudera.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:18 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Just to say thanks References: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060602070605080605090707" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------060602070605080605090707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Phil, If you prefer working with rpm or deb packages then you should check Debs: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-deb Rpms: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-rpm you can also try the configurator tool at my.cloudera.com which automatically generates the hadoop config files for you based on a couple of simple questions about your cluster setup. -- amr Phil Whelan wrote: > Hi Nico, > > It sounds like you are just ahead of me. We are looking at doing > exactly the same thing right now. Any tips? > > Thanks, > Phil > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just moved one >> of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around and compare >> results from our traditional methods. >> >> Wow ! >> >> All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward this >> project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. >> >> I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just like it >> more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get into Hive. >> >> Cheers all and have fun! >> >> Nico >> >> > > > > --------------060602070605080605090707-- From general-return-365-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 04:38:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20791 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 04:38:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 04:38:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 33584 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33525 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33511 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 04:38:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:38:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saurabhnanda@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-vw0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:38:44 +0000 Received: by vwj34 with SMTP id 34so553161vwj.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:38:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2YKEXB44OXNeYmNFR8R6HzjiI2mW1RbJT6mu9lz16fw=; b=wkHemTzjTTgB78ZJvLMnzApgVUZ31Hed3ExsIKQNKZ4rGFGe+wlut3+nBbdcH40QKE o0pPAkMMO7UdPBrsqozClinouR1tBJP/gc3kMq3VtlLWfW6uzUrtAt641iN3kwxlFmkp dirupfjdImC3RRjGCgwtZYohIUu25699dubms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qsLBY6F51EwjyGgrcE3hEt13+TFb+wfLrVx/QEJmpBzZ119nHBLFTAqEvb6zcq5ffm xMZhYOA1kYdNcvwmX+t5RUNvNHVrlmQ5cwLqFX+YfxSOFRluIcXBj6tsBRBgZkO93Zvz jkQp+GjGarFdXDVBSRKd/gl8FYmFTuPRTRV4E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.81.70 with SMTP id w6mr2267155vck.32.1247200703372; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:38:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <794f042d0907080506h38ff3392tabe85b6d5fb9e243@mail.gmail.com> <794f042d0907082115q75692e5an527d4284eab61c83@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:08:23 +0530 Message-ID: <794f042d0907092138s6a19926u2c9e5f2d340290e1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Wrong FS error From: Saurabh Nanda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e647f026e36e9e046e528a7d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e647f026e36e9e046e528a7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Bogdan. Your solution given below solved my problem. I tried setting up tinydns on the master, but the package on Ubuntu Intrepid is broken, so I gave up and went along with /etc/hosts. Saurabh. > Well, if you use /etc/hosts, why you bother with IP addresses then? > Well, they are wrong anyway. For the start, remove "*-hadoop" from > 127.0.0.1 on both machines and RTFM about /etc/hosts here: > http://www.geo.arizona.edu/tools/man-cgi?hosts+5 I would suggest you > to go with something like this: > > On 172.16.37.72 should be: > -------------------------------------- > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 172.16.37.56 master-hadoop.local master-hadoop > > > On 172.16.37.56 should be: > -------------------------------------- > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 172.16.37.72 slave1-hadoop.local slave1-hadoop > > -- http://nandz.blogspot.com http://foodieforlife.blogspot.com --0016e647f026e36e9e046e528a7d-- From general-return-366-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 04:45:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21692 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 04:45:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 04:45:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 37767 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:46:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37680 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37670 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 04:46:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:46:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saurabhnanda@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.196] (HELO mail-vw0-f196.google.com) (209.85.212.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:45:52 +0000 Received: by vwj34 with SMTP id 34so555138vwj.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:45:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eFkMwsz4kdCjHcJ1hIwuzK2JGvHHikjgb0niRQXSAwU=; b=uZSnvFy5cZGXul3nGnVy7dpIkJ3gP98l8xeM/m3tRKX6MzNSB797dW5tqbqxdMZQbQ 3lP5/LtSU7ggBX16mvSlgFGjtrhTjrggJN9hzOhDlYvqUvFXYoRlaEbpxQm1GQgwvUEy fSvegT+QEJBL3kLDslt7EC5TVYkaXePVOy8z8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TUdnSD7uoAYqPnpWnFZ2mYyVwEjQb47csjaZKBY7r2DUo57hPQGJd5FDFcxsQsgZyL FYL+wNAXHGG4rSxlYDey+cwaURiVB/PejglopBFe9UxfNL6KXrwq7eTCoJG6l47tTquJ VsM9Uppnojoi+m3TVRsOrp6QCNuJ40LeIomdE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.94.133 with SMTP id z5mr2277689vcm.19.1247201131552; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:15:31 +0530 Message-ID: <794f042d0907092145m1d622777m4bd4c1dd2dd6af7c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Weblog analysis -- Cloudbase vs Hive vs Pig? From: Saurabh Nanda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64618aa68e1eb046e52a456 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64618aa68e1eb046e52a456 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Does anyone have any pearls of wisdom around this? I'm spending part of my work time on developing a scalable weblog analysis system running on a 4 to 6 node cluster (standard desktop class machines). I don't have much time to try and benchmark all three tools (Cloudbase, Hive, and Pig) and would really appreciate if someone can give me a heads-up on what to spend my time on. Some specifics: a) Which tool can give me the best performance for this problem? (eg. best use of indexes, data partitioning, etc.) b) Which tool has the most efficient data storage so that I can store more days' worth of data into the cluster for ad-hoc analysis. c) Which tool is more mature and will not crash (for example, the disclaimer on the Hive Wiki really scared me -- http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive/GettingStarted) Thanks, Saurabh. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com http://foodieforlife.blogspot.com --0016e64618aa68e1eb046e52a456-- From general-return-367-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 04:58:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23117 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 04:58:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 04:58:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 44188 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44114 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 04:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44104 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 04:58:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:58:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:58:00 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so447678pzk.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.121.19 with SMTP id t19mr2486549wac.83.1247201858907; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c26sm1038082waa.15.2009.07.09.21.57.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A56C9E9.8090907@cloudera.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:56:09 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Weblog analysis -- Cloudbase vs Hive vs Pig? References: <794f042d0907092145m1d622777m4bd4c1dd2dd6af7c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <794f042d0907092145m1d622777m4bd4c1dd2dd6af7c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org see this thread: http://markmail.org/thread/wzekarj5vpylj3qc Also, Hive and Pig are both official Apache Hadoop projects with larger user/developer communities than Cloudbase (which is GPL2 license as opposed to Apache license). -- amr Saurabh Nanda wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have any pearls of wisdom around this? > > I'm spending part of my work time on developing a scalable weblog analysis > system running on a 4 to 6 node cluster (standard desktop class machines). I > don't have much time to try and benchmark all three tools (Cloudbase, Hive, > and Pig) and would really appreciate if someone can give me a heads-up on > what to spend my time on. Some specifics: > > a) Which tool can give me the best performance for this problem? (eg. best > use of indexes, data partitioning, etc.) > b) Which tool has the most efficient data storage so that I can store more > days' worth of data into the cluster for ad-hoc analysis. > c) Which tool is more mature and will not crash (for example, the disclaimer > on the Hive Wiki really scared me -- > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive/GettingStarted) > > Thanks, > Saurabh. > From general-return-368-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 05:08:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24964 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 05:08:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 05:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 50004 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 05:08:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49918 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 05:08:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49908 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 05:08:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:08:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.206] (HELO mail-fx0-f206.google.com) (209.85.220.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:08:09 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so163629fxm.29 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/4DMC1LvYF8U5WicGUc59SWpRxYc14fxvBBoAYX/38A=; b=bV8tJpyOKw2r8zgMFY8oN/dhlji3+VupfnUCXU9PAVqbYH1ijBsNpVFqyaa9Kva/K8 UHg0CVa3Ei71jt48x4qV1Zjcg/aXrNWGwo0EiXhfzmaR6j2AH8ajnVKDQ87akexnQXCZ KTjMJkI3fxNInYnPMQ1dPm3pYYPLZaGnraaoo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=E6aZinIYtma6JaKSNYSeNIwYIczPJYhxqdzrY2T5obKOPITQnm56/9qi7mHqzJJmfT HG/bkoQBqWdKkMG/I/kWSERvqeqc/hc51n2E587Pqw9VELxWC8qT/RbnwrLtS/DNKrMj cUv4CebZuRWuN9+0ytIJhG1RltLEJSL5M+xgg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.55.199 with SMTP id v7mr1486862bkg.141.1247202467594; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A56BEB2.2080503@cloudera.com> References: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> <4A56BEB2.2080503@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Just to say thanks From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a90c0b4388046e52f4fb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a90c0b4388046e52f4fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Very helpful - thanks! On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Amr Awadallah wrote: > Phil, > > If you prefer working with rpm or deb packages then you should check > > Debs: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-deb > Rpms: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-rpm > > you can also try the configurator tool at my.cloudera.com which > automatically generates the hadoop config files for you based on a couple of > simple questions about your cluster setup. > > -- amr > > > Phil Whelan wrote: > >> Hi Nico, >> >> It sounds like you are just ahead of me. We are looking at doing >> exactly the same thing right now. Any tips? >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just moved >>> one >>> of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around and >>> compare >>> results from our traditional methods. >>> >>> Wow ! >>> >>> All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward this >>> project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. >>> >>> I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just like >>> it >>> more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get into >>> Hive. >>> >>> Cheers all and have fun! >>> >>> Nico >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > --001636c5a90c0b4388046e52f4fb-- From general-return-369-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 12:10:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23575 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 12:10:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 12:10:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 23436 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 12:10:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23380 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 12:10:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23369 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 12:10:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:10:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qiaomuf@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:10:08 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so688874qyk.5 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=IhsDuek+S2o7KouHtyHU2AvmWf2zAmCJMSuADpOuQkA=; b=V/IMC/hqXM0V7pX4Q1sTUOQyQkwrTfftovlrwmFKtYk5K+vvoTQDrhybHltvJ7hgDv OvTZcz0yb5eK/qt6MDPRE7hIJy0XLqi34YMAaDewQtrKs/Fm3vKnsnVau2d8bPIMpX6Z 8kZ8vMwQmxsInRuH+PpIeuewQ4w35Dcd2BjDU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Dnqu3o/B8I/dpVgxr8veWN4hT+YDQdRFLH7D1DKmA2Nc6tzMdBU3KUi6KgDzHqhrs0 /aiSmvTZY87NlPFAdPo04Enl3g1z0HS92bpoZhhVofW2LrqynjhrZSTe3bkefDLEziG9 5xVWonTZs08IM/JmNplUaQ3cTsGQf9j4lOMiA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.16 with SMTP id f16mr328041qcn.85.1247227787073; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:09:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Mu Qiao Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:09:27 +0800 Message-ID: <396ceda90907100509s16cd9d21jd005ee60f4acc18c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Why is Spilled Records always equal to Map output records To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee31633dea6046e58d9b1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ee31633dea6046e58d9b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I notice it from the web console after I've tried to run serveral jobs. Every one of the jobs has the number of Spilled Records equal to Map output records. I know it is better that there are as few Spilled Records as possible. But = I don't know why this happened. How could it be? --=20 Best wishes, Qiao Mu MOE KLINNS Lab and SKLMS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University Department of Computer Science and Technology, Xi=92an Jiaotong University TEL: 15991676983 E-mail: qiaomuf@gmail.com --0016364ee31633dea6046e58d9b1-- From general-return-370-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 19:06:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36562 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 19:06:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 19:06:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 39872 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39793 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39783 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 19:07:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:07:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:06:51 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so947912qyk.5 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:06:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.70.141 with SMTP id d13mr447302qcj.70.1247252790434; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:06:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A56C9E9.8090907@cloudera.com> References: <794f042d0907092145m1d622777m4bd4c1dd2dd6af7c@mail.gmail.com> <4A56C9E9.8090907@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:06:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Weblog analysis -- Cloudbase vs Hive vs Pig? From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016360e3b3c84e75c046e5eabe5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016360e3b3c84e75c046e5eabe5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Also see some benchmarks run by the Hive team at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-396. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Amr Awadallah wrote: > see this thread: > > http://markmail.org/thread/wzekarj5vpylj3qc > > Also, Hive and Pig are both official Apache Hadoop projects with larger > user/developer communities than Cloudbase (which is GPL2 license as opposed > to Apache license). > > -- amr > > > Saurabh Nanda wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone have any pearls of wisdom around this? >> >> I'm spending part of my work time on developing a scalable weblog analysis >> system running on a 4 to 6 node cluster (standard desktop class machines). >> I >> don't have much time to try and benchmark all three tools (Cloudbase, >> Hive, >> and Pig) and would really appreciate if someone can give me a heads-up on >> what to spend my time on. Some specifics: >> >> a) Which tool can give me the best performance for this problem? (eg. best >> use of indexes, data partitioning, etc.) >> b) Which tool has the most efficient data storage so that I can store more >> days' worth of data into the cluster for ad-hoc analysis. >> c) Which tool is more mature and will not crash (for example, the >> disclaimer >> on the Hive Wiki really scared me -- >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive/GettingStarted) >> >> Thanks, >> Saurabh. >> >> > --0016360e3b3c84e75c046e5eabe5-- From general-return-371-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 22:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94075 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 22:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 22:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 83561 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 22:49:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83474 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 22:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83463 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 22:49:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:49:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil123@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:49:24 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so560541qwh.35 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=XB51Lpdimqnooav4L+SvTdGGSaDaT+P7RLB8FjeX9IM=; b=LfHHf4Y56h59rEmMLFVvq2OQraW93DRKHThWTp2l0H2/fZOAvB6cKAn868dzHwR4ST H7n+svMbQiz0en/cUfS3gEtVv0LT1jYogB8FzrI/KcUGGpJJqFAOGSi/b4KmSuBlciBF Z6Js5DFNE+r8o7AdUilmt/XZYfs0q5OZD6rEE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=eZBRg1vH5FmSB2prlnDhfWv7JRy15n6r4uIPlMy1oquUrQ+qT8SAfjaEEaf4eVcUno CiGFyeZF9WzSl/bWFAn3l1I2nUltstu9n5QRbjuzzsU+CtSwhOByJ25uuq4mi2Wg6dbx fWE3AKpXezgmP5JgO7nr1pr1TV+TpExn0DxfM= Received: by 10.224.73.129 with SMTP id q1mr2096493qaj.183.1247352543298; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.198.139.18? ([24.114.236.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm3922765qwa.57.2009.07.11.15.49.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:49:02 -0700 (PDT) References: <9cafbc680907091025w3b0c653ao14b26dfcdc9b754b@mail.gmail.com> <4A56BEB2.2080503@cloudera.com> Message-Id: <62F58204-08A2-4C11-9BCE-61D76E4A99D1@gmail.com> From: Phil Whelan To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4A56BEB2.2080503@cloudera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C97d) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C97d) Subject: Re: Just to say thanks Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:48:53 -0700 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the advice Nico and Amr! I'll be sure a send an update on how I get on. Phil Sent from my iPhone On 2009-07-09, at 9:08 PM, Amr Awadallah wrote: > Phil, > > If you prefer working with rpm or deb packages then you should check > > Debs: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-deb > Rpms: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-rpm > > you can also try the configurator tool at my.cloudera.com which > automatically generates the hadoop config files for you based on a > couple of simple questions about your cluster setup. > > -- amr > > Phil Whelan wrote: >> Hi Nico, >> >> It sounds like you are just ahead of me. We are looking at doing >> exactly the same thing right now. Any tips? >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Nico Coetzee >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I found the Hadoop project only over the week-end and I have just >>> moved one >>> of my logfile parsing jobs onto a 3 node cluster to play around >>> and compare >>> results from our traditional methods. >>> >>> Wow ! >>> >>> All I can say is thanks for all the people who contributed toward >>> this >>> project. This must be the coolest tech I found this year so far. >>> >>> I have only scratched the surface so far but I am sure I will just >>> like it >>> more and more as time goes by. My next objective is to really get >>> into Hive. >>> >>> Cheers all and have fun! >>> >>> Nico >>> >>> >> >> >> >> From general-return-372-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 07:15:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43457 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 07:15:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 07:15:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 38568 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 07:15:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38516 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 07:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38506 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 07:15:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:15:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of the3rdhr@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.188] (HELO mail-vw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.212.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:15:50 +0000 Received: by vwj26 with SMTP id 26so722007vwj.5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rdW91PZFxbftg5KJLppVyUHRtv6LjLqHnelKv4z1lnM=; b=jXhRdiBoHXBEUOl2nvvSsxbYzcCUbAP0p/7wKwCSOGjH3aFHCHZhwKfaZxccyd0mIr 5rpyc5Fk+5wjfaaGvZRvdi+Bh2Lkx3vHuTinAQbeX7w7KGvQLLsUD2TtP8UU8/LyaPuZ YFgWI9kAL3DRZ53uo30TLYG/9Z7K9sLciv/SU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XiCVBQ1+DR7o6JcNQ/ih0LGQFBTABuNXPT+9+Y75uSC7z5RQTQc+0GOmabC9AJA1Mo LcrzLeASzlOGK83UIiyqQSDC/MEd/vWRvhxoVBG3OPoCDaW3hS7+CrVrTdvmq5Wc/YXf Y20TXb61Sq2McK00VrkB8f3MrvSILsGwNI6Kw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.83.201 with SMTP id g9mr6683396vcl.42.1247469329505; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:15:29 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: I wonder why split the project From: the3rdhr To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364eca22411fce046e911603 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364eca22411fce046e911603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello. I saw the svn last week, the project is splited to common, hdfs, mapreduce. I'd like to know the reason why split the project. I can find the reason in the web page of hadoop. please someone tell me :) --0016364eca22411fce046e911603-- From general-return-373-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 08:03:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56956 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 08:03:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 08:03:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 88818 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88738 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88728 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 08:03:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:03:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.205] (HELO mail-fx0-f205.google.com) (209.85.220.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:03:20 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so373926fxm.29 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.55.140 with SMTP id u12mr4947217bkg.127.1247472179146; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:02:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Amr Awadallah Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:02:44 -0700 Message-ID: <6e412fb10907130102r67c6da61rbfa25ef9d59b2406@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: I wonder why split the project To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c924d91af0b8046e91c067 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c924d91af0b8046e91c067 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > please someone tell me :) to make your life harder :) Seriously though, the community realized that coupling HDFS and MapReduce made it hard to evolve them, and even harder to test them. The current split will create some headaches in the short term, but it sets a very solid foundation for the future. -- amr On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM, the3rdhr wrote: > Hello. > > I saw the svn last week, > the project is splited to common, hdfs, mapreduce. > > I'd like to know the reason why split the project. > I can find the reason in the web page of hadoop. > > please someone tell me :) > --001636c924d91af0b8046e91c067-- From general-return-374-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 08:25:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63097 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 08:24:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 08:24:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18270 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18197 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18187 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 08:25:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of the3rdhr@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.188] (HELO mail-vw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.212.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:24:58 +0000 Received: by vwj26 with SMTP id 26so740598vwj.5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:24:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c1IlBWoC6dYH6ercnKBTz+CvkW7N/OoNG0uymNetblw=; b=uyDtZ8fpwdKgewum1bIhQV2Tx2dExAlyoC2YIf0GqYuZn5Bv+Evk34dE0xtyFU84k7 dH83VupgUI1821Hy4t7QJVk6zeUGY8xCrag59iBDRvunCVev6WPmvaUJO7pHxFdQ3GCm rJsy9v2E82p3Z5N7ZdNRam/R7i5oGEAVMfGL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=n9hSP3UjYgCmWUa5LDZ1tn18OwhWl96KAsbZWxJJtr6DLQHAOkaj1tpaQmHS6c49uR 60P4bTYqLaaoh39V1gp6joimByw7vUQPSJfBvc1CcrW235chJJOXRh5NqmF4i2S+OZRi SAdW9PN+MLBDzDnAFiQrGdVEPAlaP0KUGaQlE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.85.198 with SMTP id p6mr6810632vcl.48.1247473477231; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:24:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6e412fb10907130102r67c6da61rbfa25ef9d59b2406@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e412fb10907130102r67c6da61rbfa25ef9d59b2406@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:24:37 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I wonder why split the project From: the3rdhr To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6464f6c7a25ab046e920dbb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6464f6c7a25ab046e920dbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you for your reply. I'd like to know more information about split project. I cannot find the information of that, in hadoop site, mailling list ;-( Can I see the detail information about that by web page, mailling list or some documents? and I don't want to be my life harder :-) 2009/7/13 Amr Awadallah > > please someone tell me :) > > to make your life harder :) > > Seriously though, the community realized that coupling HDFS and MapReduce > made it hard to evolve them, and even harder to test them. The current > split > will create some headaches in the short term, but it sets a very solid > foundation for the future. > > -- amr > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM, the3rdhr wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I saw the svn last week, > > the project is splited to common, hdfs, mapreduce. > > > > I'd like to know the reason why split the project. > > I can find the reason in the web page of hadoop. > > > > please someone tell me :) > > > --0016e6464f6c7a25ab046e920dbb-- From general-return-375-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 09:05:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71954 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 09:05:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 09:05:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 63506 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 09:05:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63411 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 09:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63401 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 09:05:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:05:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.51.199.98] (HELO mail10.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:05:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 14548 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 09:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.100]) (68.183.197.7) by mail10.dslextreme.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:04:38 -0700 Message-ID: <4A5AF89E.8060509@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:04:30 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: I wonder why split the project References: <6e412fb10907130102r67c6da61rbfa25ef9d59b2406@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090901000209070307030602" X-MagicMail-UUID: 31a08eb4-6f8c-11de-8861-00188bf6df8c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------090901000209070307030602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache Hadoop website will be updated shortly to reflect the split. You can look at these JIRAs to follow progress on that front: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-741 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-477 -- amr > Thank you for your reply. > > I'd like to know more information about split project. > I cannot find the information of that, in hadoop site, mailling list ;-( > Can I see the detail information about that by web page, mailling list or > some documents? > > and I don't want to be my life harder :-) > > 2009/7/13 Amr Awadallah > > >>> please someone tell me :) >>> >> to make your life harder :) >> >> Seriously though, the community realized that coupling HDFS and MapReduce >> made it hard to evolve them, and even harder to test them. The current >> split >> will create some headaches in the short term, but it sets a very solid >> foundation for the future. >> >> -- amr >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM, the3rdhr wrote: >> >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I saw the svn last week, >>> the project is splited to common, hdfs, mapreduce. >>> >>> I'd like to know the reason why split the project. >>> I can find the reason in the web page of hadoop. >>> >>> please someone tell me :) >>> >>> > > --------------090901000209070307030602-- From general-return-376-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 15:35:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43512 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 15:35:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 15:35:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 27221 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 15:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27168 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 15:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27158 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 15:35:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:35:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shruti.jain1988@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:35:40 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so744696wfg.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XzreUijK0HR6kZlL8k8U4NvKY1Wl+/s4mVY0vDY72ag=; b=xfu8GAQDBoWgOG0w1ph7LGnSI0qKUzflY2/kfY97LprDTgNtN4di/lhhBmKXyDzr1d B5JjDIAH2oMAUUSEi8R9pBm5GZPgbNpWCw5UPiqT6qBgKFz9vNWhKE/7+6J0xDjqvH/d cr09liIlffBDM/TY/31h6nE+47lnYMTfc4a/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VPT8Qmf6kCnl8nvwl4HYvwUpt9ZBeEnbJPoHtZPjrkD/3/SZRM1K7uJ0PGmKQ0onY5 CjoCCMtOOS8OwiEprSkmtjmRYdVb/oFhTLjO+1Bkul14xvbNMuqzhjGXJ4nSksS5jPWr WS0AVBGM44bHI1YG+shnh1B8tTiM2uDSmaPfM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.226.1 with SMTP id y1mr1279340wfg.294.1247499320704; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:35:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59714e760907130318l3d13b93ape22750b24b231a7e@mail.gmail.com> References: <59714e760907130318l3d13b93ape22750b24b231a7e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:05:20 +0530 Message-ID: <59714e760907130835l4a1e05abld5477e2249ce6080@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Speculative Processing in Hadoop From: shruti jain To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Everyone, I am a newbie and need some help. I saw on Hadoop wiki that there can be projects to improve Hadoop and map-reduce performance on available benchmarks(sort etc).. In a distributed file system environment, caching can be followed. In such systems, whenever a file access is required, the client has to check the content in the local cache with reference to the server file system. By the time server responds to this query of the client, the client can execute the requested operations on the data available in the cache. If the server responds that the client has the most recently modified file then the client can proceed with the processing otherwise it can rollback to a previous state and start with newer version of the file. This will save processing power, CPU cycles time. This can be applied to Hadoop as well. Say we are sorting a file. With map-reduce sorting can be done this way. A client requests the server about the modification time of the file and starts execution on the file it has in the cache. When server responds it can check the cached copy and proceed accordingly. Could any one please discuss whether this can be done in Hadoop or not. Is it already implemented or is anyone else working on the same. If this is not the right place to discuss then can you direct me to some other source of information. Thank You. Shruti From general-return-377-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 18:50:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51645 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 18:50:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 18:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 59350 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:50:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59261 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59251 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 18:50:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.188] (HELO mail-vw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.212.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:50:06 +0000 Received: by vwj26 with SMTP id 26so1066745vwj.5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PtMpUxQtY5lBl/T8BGFVXR/pC3dfLsiVHAn7eyRPxLY=; b=w2mAGzhZHnELR8zyEcEsQ/teIm4lBErS7Nw4h6DtlOpfMBzwchm01Izx9RdquIxmOQ Tyl1vripmUaZ12zu9ykcsrXkjKbOq+uXztkvbO3atqbTl5z3S/F6/F5ld+89XitKePj3 9n8lGXH+pU61C1gYDpLrXRgFdfvlZJ+r5/ctA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GA346fhoOYf2nh1Ijgy8IvWklzbVu+Y9IHaw8qjO1sR3D1kDUYIIq3VerLXEgV3VkJ berJuRiXqG8I1bzKPqEZhoNf0V0OuxDm1tVqcGcozEbCtOdOvvvmdjrCBXViHL3fnrAn eIKJ4tAb4lcGyFvSLrWsRZUOHfnRK/pi96q94= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.96.15 with SMTP id f15mr7572053vcn.116.1247510985170; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59714e760907130835l4a1e05abld5477e2249ce6080@mail.gmail.com> References: <59714e760907130318l3d13b93ape22750b24b231a7e@mail.gmail.com> <59714e760907130835l4a1e05abld5477e2249ce6080@mail.gmail.com> From: Andrey Kuzmin Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:49:25 +0400 Message-ID: <2a31deca0907131149m52c70e05w85dd9586e91e7ff6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Speculative Processing in Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As far as I understand, Hadoop solves the problem you're trying to tackle differently - it moves computation close to the data (by assigning task to a node that possesses local copy), not vice versa where speculative execution might turn helpful as, e.g., in network file-systems. Regards, Andrey On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:35 PM, shruti jain wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am a newbie and need some help. I saw on Hadoop wiki that there can > be projects to improve Hadoop and map-reduce performance on available > benchmarks(sort etc).. > > In a distributed file system environment, caching can be followed. In > such systems, whenever a file access is required, the client has to > check the content in the local cache with reference to the server file > system. By the time server responds to this query of the client, the > client can execute the requested operations on the data available in > the cache. If the server responds that the client has the most > recently modified file then the client can proceed with the processing > otherwise it can rollback to a previous state and start with newer > version of the file. This will save processing power, CPU cycles time. > > This can be applied to Hadoop as well. Say we are sorting a file. With > map-reduce sorting can be done this way. A client requests the server > about the modification time of the file and starts execution on the > file it has in the cache. When server responds it can check the cached > copy and proceed accordingly. > > Could any one please discuss whether this can be done in Hadoop or > not. Is it already implemented or is anyone else working on the same. > If this is not the right place to discuss then can you direct me to > some other source of information. > > Thank You. > > Shruti > From general-return-378-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 22:11:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60822 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 22:11:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 22:11:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 97229 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:11:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97152 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97108 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 22:11:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:11:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:11:38 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n6EMAsYa074886 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:10:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=MHj9PtkMXTFff5ntSiRL5Bbo+d8e1abhvDquF/+5EC0AFKEAcwF6INmdOgqOWv8g Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:10:54 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:10:53 -0700 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Aug 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Aug 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoEz/Qe1PyDbbbWRXiTzKa8a+fTUg== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E143AEC17@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E143AEC17SP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E143AEC17SP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I'd like to remind everyone that Yahoo! is excited to continue hosting the = monthly Bay Area Hadoop user groups. The next meeting is scheduled for Aug 19th (recurring the 3rd Wednesday of = every month) at Yahoo!'s Sunnyvale campus. Agenda and event registration details are coming up shortly. Looking forward to seeing you there! Dekel --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E143AEC17SP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-379-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:43:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90710 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:43:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 65637 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:44:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65555 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65545 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:44:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:44:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:44:45 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so755908ewy.29 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwvH8XZZAoRetgmhxPWiThbfOIDx/ajKsH3lNHtY0JM=; b=TyjmPAlgkk/dknoAZVInVL8wCtdZJwDHETqVW4voGV130+YRRk2s9PS1/NIZ6mEe+B 2lFZwhdj/Hkj/3OAPhQOv3MQ11MM2Sf3h607uBspWOaludkIe07CK3e2LcitCQSj5mW/ s0Eca+Lm48SdXdo1lBPZhMQbhlAzjEb7qdfVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RJO6zUoquXBB/BBXpEvKQ2E6rpKI843pYRhQ/k0V9yzP9fan//p8BGR6LjyjNKpVBT Ttij/ZjuWLQ+p5N6tL6sIE0DiUI0cVQxThEjVMY52tQYdnakWfi9W74e49hxUTkzRIg+ XbF0B9nwvQM2KFyJgYP0BDcUTr+WTfZeOe30w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.17.212 with SMTP id j62mr276586wej.132.1247831065402; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:44:25 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0907170444x61dac5a7s8988012351520459@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Downloads linking incorrectly or mirrors are not updated? From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, I know you are reorganising the sub projects, but just for your info... The downloads linked from the Hadoop site (http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/mapreduce/) are all incorrect, or the mirrors are not updated (for what I see from Denmark anyway). All the links end in .../mapreduce/ but the mirrors have the downloads available on .../core/ Cheers, Tim From general-return-380-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:47:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91363 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:47:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:47:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 67850 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:48:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67768 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67755 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:48:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:48:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.183.249.146] (HELO mail.etracker.de) (85.183.249.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:48:06 +0000 Received: by mail.etracker.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 116E8631172; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:47:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.etracker.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from mail.etracker.local (unknown [85.183.249.129]) by mail.etracker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB5663116E for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:47:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:47:43 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work Thread-Index: AcoG1GVLEd9JoU0gSvCkOJ13nEYjNg== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kaatz?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60,RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Hi, I'm trying to use thrift with PHP to handle file system operations on = HDFS without any success. I run a thrift server instance started with the script = 'start_thrift_server.sh' located in = 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/scripts/'. Then I use a little script = 'hdfs.php' to connect to this thrift server and try to create a new file = 'foo' on HDFS. But the file is created on my local filesystem not on = HDFS. Can anybody help me? Thanks Juergen -- hdfs.php = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ setSendTimeout(10000); $socket->setRecvTimeout(20000); = $transport =3D new TBufferedTransport($socket); $protocol =3D new = TBinaryProtocol($transport); require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/packages/hadoopfs/ThriftHadoopFileSystem.= php'); $client =3D new ThriftHadoopFileSystemClient($protocol); $transport->open(); try { $pathname =3D new Pathname(array('pathname' =3D> 'foo')); // $result =3D $client->listStatus($pathname); $result =3D $client->create($pathname); $client->close($result); print_r($result); } catch(Exception $e) { print_r($e); } $transport->close(); From general-return-381-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 16:17:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23403 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 16:17:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 16:17:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 56345 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 16:18:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56286 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 16:18:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56276 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 16:18:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:18:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.219] (HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com) (209.85.219.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:18:10 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so949198ewy.29 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:17:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XJy6ZZOaRt6oujRuqEFiTmVpuLLeh++5QALwp/ryU00=; b=P0USzIv6WXsUGIOFY2s90lAzRO00bY+LcykckWmB4oZ5uCkM4Kv/LTXiuYD1QSogOr XIKDt71T9YTR8OOR7u9XgCv5nyR0njIRmLlHd8BJULNzZUJUOB/Ns1YPkGcyFinBgbcq Fy7dSGWlnzc71DPvhAi9aHGRrFsZIMQxS41JI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rI4YjUlwysw/J/qbYYuNETaRGg3WrYcI/FPpLDKtC+i/LpQY59TwpGGSVdg7tgGi4U k2SzkRZW84mahX15qnnz7EadtQgZ/9/WvAGjUj2xDfqrHHByqj19g2Nz7qlhRe7bF6n3 rgIPHrEedkWFo+s6ULRUYJaY9AVzldIqpzOWQ= Received: by 10.216.7.207 with SMTP id 57mr351013wep.104.1247847469467; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-179-105.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.179.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i35sm3947279gve.26.2009.07.17.09.17.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A60A428.5070606@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:17:44 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Downloads linking incorrectly or mirrors are not updated? References: <32120a6a0907170444x61dac5a7s8988012351520459@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0907170444x61dac5a7s8988012351520459@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for catching this, Tim. I just committed a fix that should be live within an hour. Doug tim robertson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I know you are reorganising the sub projects, but just for your info... > The downloads linked from the Hadoop site > (http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/mapreduce/) are all > incorrect, or the mirrors are not updated (for what I see from Denmark > anyway). > All the links end in .../mapreduce/ but the mirrors have the downloads > available on .../core/ > > Cheers, > > Tim From general-return-382-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 00:27:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46059 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 00:27:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 00:27:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 38957 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 00:28:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38885 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 00:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38875 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 00:28:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:28:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:28:40 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so2035362yxe.5 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cYUQxNGW2TLCprjX9mwXTF28gKTlNNptTf4FxylLY9Q=; b=TgOJNL67ghHq9jR0koYrzqeqSwMXsXS0IGPyiPRLkovJjvNZG0mnkuj/XMdUtssZFj oCyevoVuF8IXUOjxAxPNLXpn+3zmKNqrYxAipIcg50MkQjm33JD8hxdCISV/5r5lbHZk Ouj5XU8sOAdPv33gBwitU2Ays2/eYnD0Fc3+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=opDrrq5b4+YmhBSX5H1mdjNIszkdiYn3imxBSNz4/qU9BA8iJ0eIEFtdKRFDbP1cVD 9gL1PF24+rd84QIi4Yp0CrHET2azKTXcEU5gbQnALk2P2nS8w+yXBgLP4eEMnz4F2CQA iuQtXQg4ufpI6ExTsIBf+QTUuoJ5WoORZrhFY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.10.14 with SMTP id n14mr1701834ybi.106.1247876899682; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:28:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:28:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6af0a54384f046eeffbdf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd6af0a54384f046eeffbdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am suspecting that the thrift server is started using the configuration i= n your hadoop workspace rather than using the configuration of the HDFS cluster that you must have setup earlier. Please check the CLASSPATH of the thrit server....it should include the configuration of your HDFS cluster. thanks, dhruba 2009/7/17 J=FCrgen Kaatz > Hi, > > I'm trying to use thrift with PHP to handle file system operations on HDF= S > without any success. > > I run a thrift server instance started with the script > 'start_thrift_server.sh' is supposed located in > 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/scripts/'. Then I use a little script > 'hdfs.php' to connect to this thrift server and try to create a new file > 'foo' on HDFS. But the file is created on my local filesystem not on HDFS= . > > Can anybody help me? > Thanks Juergen > > -- hdfs.php > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > error_reporting(E_ALL); > ini_set('display_errors', 'on'); > > $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT'] =3D '/home/hadoop/cc/thrift'; > define('ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT', $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT']); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/Thrift.php' ); > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TSocket.php' ); > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TBufferedTransport.php' ); > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.php' ); > > $socket =3D new TSocket('hadoop-master', 50021); > $socket->setSendTimeout(10000); $socket->setRecvTimeout(20000); $transpor= t =3D > new TBufferedTransport($socket); $protocol =3D new > TBinaryProtocol($transport); > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/packages/hadoopfs/ThriftHadoopFileSystem.= php'); > $client =3D new ThriftHadoopFileSystemClient($protocol); > > $transport->open(); > > try > { > $pathname =3D new Pathname(array('pathname' =3D> 'foo')); > // $result =3D $client->listStatus($pathname); > $result =3D $client->create($pathname); > $client->close($result); > print_r($result); > } > catch(Exception $e) > { > print_r($e); > } > > $transport->close(); > > --000e0cd6af0a54384f046eeffbdf-- From general-return-383-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 09:16:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6067 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 09:16:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 09:16:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 86236 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 09:17:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86158 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 09:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86148 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 09:17:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:17:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.183.249.146] (HELO mail.etracker.de) (85.183.249.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:16:57 +0000 Received: by mail.etracker.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 71471641710; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:16:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.etracker.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from mail.etracker.local (unknown [85.183.249.129]) by mail.etracker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B588464170D for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:16:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work Thread-Index: AcoHPrxvDBDumW3mTdW1ZiIyInMobAB2mIDA References: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kaatz?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_80,RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Hi dhruba, thank you for your answer. I had the same idea like you before, that the = thrift server configuration cannot read the hadoop cluster = configuration. The Hadoop-Cluster is installed in '/usr/local/hadoop' = and the respective configuration in '/usr/local/hadoop/conf'. You can = watch the classpath of the thrift server below (and the respective = script to start the thrift server). For me it seems all is ok... The Java-Code of the thrift server has a method 'public = HadoopThriftHandler()', where a configuration is generated. But for me = it seems, this must be an empty or default configuration, isn't it? Thanks in advance Juergen Method 'HadoopThriftHandler' from = 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/thriftfs/HadoopTh= riftServer.java' /** * HadoopThriftServer * * Constructor for the HadoopThriftServer glue with Thrift Class. * * @param name - the name of this handler */ public HadoopThriftHandler(String name) { conf =3D new Configuration(); now =3D now(); try { inactivityThread =3D new Daemon(new InactivityMonitor()); fs =3D FileSystem.get(conf); } catch (IOException e) { LOG.warn("Unable to open hadoop file system..."); Runtime.getRuntime().exit(-1); } }=20 Classpath of the thrift server: /usr/local/hadoop/hadoop-0.19.1-ant.jar /usr/local/hadoop/hadoop-0.19.1-core.jar /usr/local/hadoop/hadoop-0.19.1-examples.jar /usr/local/hadoop/hadoop-0.19.1-test.jar /usr/local/hadoop/hadoop-0.19.1-tools.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-cli-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-codec-1.3.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-httpclient-3.0.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-logging-1.0.4.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-logging-api-1.0.4.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/commons-net-1.4.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/hsqldb-1.8.0.10.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/jets3t-0.6.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/jetty-5.1.4.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/junit-3.8.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/kfs-0.2.0.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/log4j-1.2.15.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/oro-2.0.8.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/servlet-api.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/slf4j-api-1.4.3.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.4.3.jar /usr/local/hadoop/lib/xmlenc-0.52.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/antlr-runtime-3.0.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/asm-3.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/commons-jexl-1.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/commons-lang-2.4.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/derby.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/hive_cli.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/hive_common.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/hive_exec.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/hive_metastore.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/jdo2-api-2.1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/jline-0.9.94.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/jpox-core-1.2.2.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/jpox-enhancer-1.2.2.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/jpox-rdbms-1.2.2.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/libfb303.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/libthrift.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/stringtemplate-3.1b1.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/TestSerDe.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/hive/lib/velocity-1.5.jar /usr/local/hadoop/contrib/thriftfs/hadoop-0.19.1-thriftfs.jar /usr/local/hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/lib/hadoopthriftapi.jar /usr/local/hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/lib/libthrift.jar Script to start the thrift server: #!/bin/sh CLASSPATH=3D #TOP=3D../../../.. TOP=3D/usr/local/hadoop # the hadoop libraries for f in $TOP/*.jar ; do CLASSPATH=3D$CLASSPATH:$f done # the apache libraries for f in $TOP/lib/*.jar ; do CLASSPATH=3D$CLASSPATH:$f done # the thrift libraries for f in $TOP/contrib/hive/lib/*.jar ; do CLASSPATH=3D$CLASSPATH:$f done # the thrift server for f in $TOP/contrib/thriftfs/*.jar ; do CLASSPATH=3D$CLASSPATH:$f done # the thrift hadoop api for f in $TOP/src/contrib/thriftfs/lib/*.jar ; do CLASSPATH=3D$CLASSPATH:$f done echo $CLASSPATH exit #-agentlib:jdwp=3Dtransport=3Ddt_socket,address=3D8000,server=3Dy,suspend= =3Dn java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -cp $CLASSPATH = org.apache.hadoop.thriftfs.HadoopThriftServer $* > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhruba Borthakur [mailto:dhruba@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:28 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work >=20 > I am suspecting that the thrift server is started using the = configuration in > your hadoop workspace rather than using the configuration of the HDFS > cluster that you must have setup earlier. Please check the CLASSPATH = of the > thrit server....it should include the configuration of your HDFS = cluster. >=20 > thanks, > dhruba >=20 >=20 > 2009/7/17 J=FCrgen Kaatz >=20 > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to use thrift with PHP to handle file system operations = on HDFS > > without any success. > > > > I run a thrift server instance started with the script > > 'start_thrift_server.sh' is supposed located in > > 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/scripts/'. Then I use a little script > > 'hdfs.php' to connect to this thrift server and try to create a new = file > > 'foo' on HDFS. But the file is created on my local filesystem not on = HDFS. > > > > Can anybody help me? > > Thanks Juergen > > > > -- hdfs.php > > = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > error_reporting(E_ALL); > > ini_set('display_errors', 'on'); > > > > $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT'] =3D '/home/hadoop/cc/thrift'; > > define('ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT', $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT']); > > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/Thrift.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TSocket.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TBufferedTransport.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.php' ); > > > > $socket =3D new TSocket('hadoop-master', 50021); > > $socket->setSendTimeout(10000); $socket->setRecvTimeout(20000); = $transport =3D > > new TBufferedTransport($socket); $protocol =3D new > > TBinaryProtocol($transport); > > > > > > > = require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/packages/hadoopfs/ThriftHadoopFileSystem.= php') > ; > > $client =3D new ThriftHadoopFileSystemClient($protocol); > > > > $transport->open(); > > > > try > > { > > $pathname =3D new Pathname(array('pathname' =3D> 'foo')); > > // $result =3D $client->listStatus($pathname); > > $result =3D $client->create($pathname); > > $client->close($result); > > print_r($result); > > } > > catch(Exception $e) > > { > > print_r($e); > > } > > > > $transport->close(); > > > > From general-return-384-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 14:42:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42788 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 14:42:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 14:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 78564 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 14:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78489 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 14:43:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78471 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 14:43:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:43:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:43:17 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so1061960bwz.29 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:42:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=WHIvJBDAnq9Z7xBkSZo2wKvkCkf+XOu6nV5ltiGHN0w=; b=H5EODEA7FWIhJij733/NyluQeo6dnDLB4INy9a/XwCx7sQPGBCnVkEd+6psQ5uytQx SFD46rmnD8UN1jjhK7f7FgSrqYdNxS7PNW194Ze95hfH9khLVQoWpozKmYKCBGBEX+W9 0ndCxrEteYl/Rv2Ao6YaUurapdRg8hKQOBWY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ht4pjgyHqy6PoqslEx1aDZ6dwtjpw4zU5QNBF4CsPqSX1iwEUxjJ6x0b7uvspbyxpC nCYhIPwt5BwIYi6EclAOdHVKwbTS3wFFsWcOdvMtR3sEBxVshdbbPJpKoLbkpGODs9aH Cy400euDQhrF1t9PBtXgkEhcbyNSHIQFp+ywo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.67.146 with SMTP id r18mr4352978bki.88.1248100976095; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:42:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Job Management - getting practical From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5acb052f012046f242767 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5acb052f012046f242767 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi again, Our testing is going fantastic and I have a 4 node cluster going to our production environment mid-August (currently testing on a 3 node cluster). I am now looking more at the operational side of things and I have a number of questions around a GUI app to manage jobs (preferably browser based). Our basic requirements: - Define a unique job with parameters: - Data source (in our case a file (or files) on remote systems - Method of retrieving above files (most are scp, but some are ftp) - which cluster to push the job to (test or production cluster) - Which "spool" directory to use on the hadoop master (where I copy the raw data before uploading to the HDFS) - input and output directories to use for this job in HDFS - Where the output must be dumped after processing (export from HDFS) - What (if any) post-processing needs to take place (upload or link to relevant scripts - Of course also upload or link to the map and reduce scripts (I still use and prefer the streaming solution) - Define the run schedule of the job (almost 90% of our jobs will be run at regular intervals - at least once per day. Think along crontab lines) - Additional nice to have requirements: - Define mail addresses of people that should get the job report after it was run - Ability to move a job (with it's scripts etc.) from a "test" cluster to a "production" cluster (we test everything first before we put stuff in production) - Run certain jobs manually (once off jobs. manually re-run failed jobs) If such a system does not exist in the Open Source community I wonder if there will be sufficient interest if I start a project like this? Thanks for your feedback and suggestions Nico --001636c5acb052f012046f242767-- From general-return-385-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 15:01:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48764 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 15:01:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 15:01:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 13208 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:02:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13160 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13139 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 15:02:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:02:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:02:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c44.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.44]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n6KF15Vj099758 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=lOWnbJQKAJcln4OFLIqsXHat7ZGRfZ/cnh/jtUxRrNxMJg1oHBlNW1tJw7cbd6V0 Message-Id: <983BD9F5-EE38-4129-8D23-F513023D96C6@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Job Management - getting practical Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:01:05 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nico, You might want to take a look at Oozie: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5303 . Arun On Jul 20, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: > Hi again, > > Our testing is going fantastic and I have a 4 node cluster going to > our > production environment mid-August (currently testing on a 3 node > cluster). > > I am now looking more at the operational side of things and I have a > number > of questions around a GUI app to manage jobs (preferably browser > based). > > Our basic requirements: > > > - Define a unique job with parameters: > - Data source (in our case a file (or files) on remote systems > - Method of retrieving above files (most are scp, but some are > ftp) > - which cluster to push the job to (test or production cluster) > - Which "spool" directory to use on the hadoop master (where I > copy > the raw data before uploading to the HDFS) > - input and output directories to use for this job in HDFS > - Where the output must be dumped after processing (export from > HDFS) > - What (if any) post-processing needs to take place (upload or > link to > relevant scripts > - Of course also upload or link to the map and reduce scripts > (I still > use and prefer the streaming solution) > - Define the run schedule of the job (almost 90% of our jobs > will be > run at regular intervals - at least once per day. Think along > crontab lines) > - Additional nice to have requirements: > - Define mail addresses of people that should get the job report > after it > was run > - Ability to move a job (with it's scripts etc.) from a "test" > cluster > to a "production" cluster (we test everything first before we > put stuff in > production) > - Run certain jobs manually (once off jobs. manually re-run > failed > jobs) > > > If such a system does not exist in the Open Source community I > wonder if > there will be sufficient interest if I start a project like this? > > Thanks for your feedback and suggestions > > Nico From general-return-386-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 15:35:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58326 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 15:35:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 15:35:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 53503 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:36:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53437 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:36:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53243 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 15:36:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:36:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:36:07 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so1097872bwz.29 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:35:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gUvrv3lWkY21eSfRLSdA5A4x2PJ8PwKtgGQqvVk+i64=; b=M9tfo/OBjXh1vRgIWFAqmnEmlLrV+kiFC/DTkFTFfbU22/7WYAXQebtvGmRCY+OWO1 qOdCXAkNqP8NYj6E+ABnOt1QulKUR+DxvWqkQRq+66xiNICNB9QdH5mkLiJxkY2Eb4n2 HpF8xwwdUxSts7tWFOJuCrYJ8wCZM6yE6C/B4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XAXJVdCuixkwFy5K3RwWrBsTdITRkrh/STBSPRiXNnyyHC4QNtwHYSrFaPooM/3ilp VxjQcqL8kH2d77AlfPFdf/tHGj8d1KJZ0K/wzKYNDhVFNS7yNQ5zsPv3u2TOQG+w3Qc6 O7EJLFukOd0OgA8lz0XTTRKMVtY395EFvAvV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.68.15 with SMTP id t15mr4360293bki.139.1248104145780; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:35:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <983BD9F5-EE38-4129-8D23-F513023D96C6@yahoo-inc.com> References: <983BD9F5-EE38-4129-8D23-F513023D96C6@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:35:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Job Management - getting practical From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bcf940950c046f24e44d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5bcf940950c046f24e44d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks - this looks like it has potential. What I'm thinking is then to maybe just build a UI to basically "populate" or "build" the Oozie XML... On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Nico, > > You might want to take a look at Oozie: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5303. > > Arun > > > On Jul 20, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Nico Coetzee wrote: > > Hi again, >> >> Our testing is going fantastic and I have a 4 node cluster going to our >> production environment mid-August (currently testing on a 3 node cluster). >> >> I am now looking more at the operational side of things and I have a >> number >> of questions around a GUI app to manage jobs (preferably browser based). >> >> Our basic requirements: >> >> >> - Define a unique job with parameters: >> - Data source (in our case a file (or files) on remote systems >> - Method of retrieving above files (most are scp, but some are ftp) >> - which cluster to push the job to (test or production cluster) >> - Which "spool" directory to use on the hadoop master (where I copy >> the raw data before uploading to the HDFS) >> - input and output directories to use for this job in HDFS >> - Where the output must be dumped after processing (export from HDFS) >> - What (if any) post-processing needs to take place (upload or link to >> relevant scripts >> - Of course also upload or link to the map and reduce scripts (I still >> use and prefer the streaming solution) >> - Define the run schedule of the job (almost 90% of our jobs will be >> run at regular intervals - at least once per day. Think along >> crontab lines) >> - Additional nice to have requirements: >> - Define mail addresses of people that should get the job report after it >> was run >> - Ability to move a job (with it's scripts etc.) from a "test" cluster >> to a "production" cluster (we test everything first before we >> put stuff in >> production) >> - Run certain jobs manually (once off jobs. manually re-run failed >> jobs) >> >> >> If such a system does not exist in the Open Source community I wonder if >> there will be sufficient interest if I start a project like this? >> >> Thanks for your feedback and suggestions >> >> Nico >> > > --001636c5bcf940950c046f24e44d-- From general-return-387-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 15:40:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60324 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 15:40:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 15:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 58516 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:41:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58436 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 15:41:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58426 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 15:41:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:41:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of parbash.project@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.163] (HELO mail-fx0-f163.google.com) (209.85.220.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:40:56 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so359376fxm.5 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O6K2THrEn7y6BLHAytug/44umWlmBxSfFonN2leDX5Q=; b=G+cJOZ01Tyon5dnMByV2KSoGxTM88SM6KfcEl/F7uSpLquebz70G7wQWZ9KfryZkFe CZ9W0E9Q8b/jEpxzhlMGXjL+CPG4EAEKEjWf0XxjtOGhC9sPN3egP793OzOenjgEX9yF AkbaSPUfkoLmaEWGpnq3Y5G8VLBTKXL+3g50I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lywA7SVhvyASTclTboUSFdhU6A3w5/dhwaXBSsaj05A7Us9K5njXvlfG0c5/6fiMyZ 6qzzu3OCheeMmKl3M4wpYY8YR9ZKnDVdUZFlvsQQNtOVRxi28xe+6p+iunjR6wHfrb/g 1wbj3eEbHLkD++X+QKZu1UCIw7Ez/Y/mFKzJQ= Received: by 10.102.220.10 with SMTP id s10mr411222mug.94.1248104436148; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from W852120CRG3.pwlan-swisscom.mobile.ch ([194.209.131.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j10sm22538067muh.45.2009.07.20.08.40.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A648FF2.3080306@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:40:34 +0200 From: Milenko Petrovic User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: ANNOUNCE: ParBASH 0.1 release - Hadoop through BASH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I'd like to announce the release of the 0.1 version of ParBASH. Using ParBASH, it is possible to write bash scripts that are automatically translated into Hadoop Streaming Jobs. Here is an example script to find top 10 references for Barack Obama pages on wikipedia using Amazon EC2: wiki.sh: cat hdfs:/wikipedia-out/* | grep Obama | \ perl -ne 'while (//g) { print "$1\n"; }' |\perl -ne 'if (/http:\/\/([^\/]+)(\/|$)/) { print "$1\n"; }' |\ perl -ne ' if (/([^\.]\.)+([^\.]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}\.[^\.]+)$/) { print "$2\n";} else if (/([^\.]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,3}\.[^\.]+)$/) { print "$1\n";} else if (/([^\.]\.)*([^\.]+\.[^\.]+)$/) { print "$2\n"; }' |\ sort | uniq -c > hdfs:/out How and why of wiki.sh and parbash on http://cloud-dev.blogspot.com/2009/06/introduction-to-parbash.html Source code and more examples: http://code.google.com/p/parbash If anyone is interested in trying it out, I can help you get started. Thanks, Milenko From general-return-388-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 16:51:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92418 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 16:51:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 16:51:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 64751 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 16:52:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64678 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 16:52:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64668 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 16:52:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:52:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.99.145.7] (HELO mx.inode.at) (62.99.145.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:52:23 +0000 Received: from [213.47.112.79] (port=2372 helo=localhost) by smartmx-07.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MSw5q-0002v9-DY; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:52:02 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:52:01 +0200 From: Robert Barta To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: ParBASH 0.1 release - Hadoop through BASH Message-ID: <20090720165201.GF26881@odman.int.devc.at> Reply-To: rho@devc.at References: <4A648FF2.3080306@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A648FF2.3080306@gmail.com> Sender: Robert Barta User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Milenko Petrovic wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to announce the release of the 0.1 version of ParBASH. Using > ParBASH, it is possible to write bash scripts that are automatically > translated into Hadoop Streaming Jobs. Milenko, How does this related to http://md.devc.at/software/mapreduce/bashreduce ? \rho From general-return-389-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 18:00:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47339 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 18:00:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 18:00:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 63076 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:01:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62994 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:01:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62984 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 18:01:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:01:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.183.249.146] (HELO mail.etracker.de) (85.183.249.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:01:23 +0000 Received: by mail.etracker.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id F328764FC42; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:01:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.etracker.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from mail.etracker.local (unknown [85.183.249.129]) by mail.etracker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D8364FC3E for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:01:00 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work Thread-Index: AcoHPrxvDBDumW3mTdW1ZiIyInMobACJNzgg References: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kaatz?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_95,RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Hi Dhruba, I found the missing configuration to make my script working. Like = mentioned in the API = (http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.19.1/api/index.html) I have to = add the configuration path '/usr/local/hadoop/conf' to the beginning of = classpath in the script 'start_thrift_server.sh'. Now it works! Thank you very much Juergen > -----Original Message----- > From: Dhruba Borthakur [mailto:dhruba@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:28 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work >=20 > I am suspecting that the thrift server is started using the = configuration in > your hadoop workspace rather than using the configuration of the HDFS > cluster that you must have setup earlier. Please check the CLASSPATH = of the > thrit server....it should include the configuration of your HDFS = cluster. >=20 > thanks, > dhruba >=20 >=20 > 2009/7/17 J=FCrgen Kaatz >=20 > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to use thrift with PHP to handle file system operations = on HDFS > > without any success. > > > > I run a thrift server instance started with the script > > 'start_thrift_server.sh' is supposed located in > > 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/scripts/'. Then I use a little script > > 'hdfs.php' to connect to this thrift server and try to create a new = file > > 'foo' on HDFS. But the file is created on my local filesystem not on = HDFS. > > > > Can anybody help me? > > Thanks Juergen > > > > -- hdfs.php > > = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > error_reporting(E_ALL); > > ini_set('display_errors', 'on'); > > > > $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT'] =3D '/home/hadoop/cc/thrift'; > > define('ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT', $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT']); > > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/Thrift.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TSocket.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TBufferedTransport.php' ); > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.php' ); > > > > $socket =3D new TSocket('hadoop-master', 50021); > > $socket->setSendTimeout(10000); $socket->setRecvTimeout(20000); = $transport =3D > > new TBufferedTransport($socket); $protocol =3D new > > TBinaryProtocol($transport); > > > > > > > = require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/packages/hadoopfs/ThriftHadoopFileSystem.= php') > ; > > $client =3D new ThriftHadoopFileSystemClient($protocol); > > > > $transport->open(); > > > > try > > { > > $pathname =3D new Pathname(array('pathname' =3D> 'foo')); > > // $result =3D $client->listStatus($pathname); > > $result =3D $client->create($pathname); > > $client->close($result); > > print_r($result); > > } > > catch(Exception $e) > > { > > print_r($e); > > } > > > > $transport->close(); > > > > From general-return-390-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 18:12:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54121 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 18:12:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 18:12:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 83848 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83757 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:13:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83747 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 18:13:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:13:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:13:09 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so3992419yxe.5 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UzY4XdPxIs0NI2c0D1/48GjAOhgs4h/M2pizGZ7ySmA=; b=mX/6Z9nEuJdSe76yhtnfjdsbCH0ONpVpe0EqCweljBvqn+uGJGF/BcxdCFace9NBr1 GntteZyBFBzfzDNfUfgyiD13k4u2M3srjXUtwsC7+tBDANQjkRLyAggYQdqmqZXuE2NT yx5ycXII9knYev9LEZtIC6B+CXO5/G2/SJM1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cnV0QN0HzGPDmMy81hzi/LSro9Gr97LThIaidC9eH58Qn2cXhOGQoueTi6j1ZyuGhk sLnL/7PRc3ZjnuSVlaL/bCND2RB7wgzhRUdxNSU4GbmZNRNrXzrnpNgLwqfwRgEU1t18 CjSlYsXn0OWQECcAKLrmZVAqdHqhpFocPJsAI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.190.5 with SMTP id n5mr7091838ybf.273.1248113568244; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:12:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4aa34eb70907171728o6f089c08l9bdf8024920355e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:12:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70907201112x60dbfca6tb03db50faa09c321@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd340f0dfe5bc046f27154e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd340f0dfe5bc046f27154e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Excellent. Good to know that it is working for you. -dhruba 2009/7/20 J=FCrgen Kaatz > Hi Dhruba, > > I found the missing configuration to make my script working. Like mention= ed > in the API (http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.19.1/api/index.html) = I > have to add the configuration path '/usr/local/hadoop/conf' to the beginn= ing > of classpath in the script 'start_thrift_server.sh'. Now it works! > > Thank you very much > Juergen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dhruba Borthakur [mailto:dhruba@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:28 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Hadoop/HDFS Thrift/PHP connection doesnt work > > > > I am suspecting that the thrift server is started using the configurati= on > in > > your hadoop workspace rather than using the configuration of the HDFS > > cluster that you must have setup earlier. Please check the CLASSPATH of > the > > thrit server....it should include the configuration of your HDFS cluste= r. > > > > thanks, > > dhruba > > > > > > 2009/7/17 J=FCrgen Kaatz > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to use thrift with PHP to handle file system operations on > HDFS > > > without any success. > > > > > > I run a thrift server instance started with the script > > > 'start_thrift_server.sh' is supposed located in > > > 'hadoop/src/contrib/thriftfs/scripts/'. Then I use a little script > > > 'hdfs.php' to connect to this thrift server and try to create a new > file > > > 'foo' on HDFS. But the file is created on my local filesystem not on > HDFS. > > > > > > Can anybody help me? > > > Thanks Juergen > > > > > > -- hdfs.php > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > error_reporting(E_ALL); > > > ini_set('display_errors', 'on'); > > > > > > $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT'] =3D '/home/hadoop/cc/thrift'; > > > define('ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT', $GLOBALS['THRIFT_ROOT']); > > > > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/Thrift.php' ); > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TSocket.php' ); > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/transport/TBufferedTransport.php' ); > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/protocol/TBinaryProtocol.php' ); > > > > > > $socket =3D new TSocket('hadoop-master', 50021); > > > $socket->setSendTimeout(10000); $socket->setRecvTimeout(20000); > $transport =3D > > > new TBufferedTransport($socket); $protocol =3D new > > > TBinaryProtocol($transport); > > > > > > > > > > > > require_once(ETCC_THRIFT_ROOT.'/packages/hadoopfs/ThriftHadoopFileSystem.= php') > > ; > > > $client =3D new ThriftHadoopFileSystemClient($protocol); > > > > > > $transport->open(); > > > > > > try > > > { > > > $pathname =3D new Pathname(array('pathname' =3D> 'foo')); > > > // $result =3D $client->listStatus($pathname); > > > $result =3D $client->create($pathname); > > > $client->close($result); > > > print_r($result); > > > } > > > catch(Exception $e) > > > { > > > print_r($e); > > > } > > > > > > $transport->close(); > > > > > > > --000e0cd340f0dfe5bc046f27154e-- From general-return-391-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 07:45:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98386 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 07:45:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 07:45:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 95106 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 07:46:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95043 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 07:46:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95023 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 07:46:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:46:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:46:07 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so836347wfg.2 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.49.4 with SMTP id w4mr1119424wfw.343.1248162344929; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm15129395wfd.23.2009.07.21.00.45.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A657222.6000606@cloudera.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:45:38 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: ParBASH 0.1 release - Hadoop through BASH References: <4A648FF2.3080306@gmail.com> <20090720165201.GF26881@odman.int.devc.at> In-Reply-To: <20090720165201.GF26881@odman.int.devc.at> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020900030008000802050003" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------020900030008000802050003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > How does this related to [bashreduce] bashreduce has nothing to do with hadoop, it just implements a simple version of the mapreduce framework using bash. It also doesn't have an equivalent of HDFS (it relies on all the nodes having local copies or access to a shared fs, or pass data using nc). ParBASH is a extension to bash which allows you to write a job as if it was a bash script, and parbash takes care of translating that to a hadoop streaming job (very clever) -- amr Robert Barta wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Milenko Petrovic wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to announce the release of the 0.1 version of ParBASH. Using >> ParBASH, it is possible to write bash scripts that are automatically >> translated into Hadoop Streaming Jobs. >> > > Milenko, > > How does this related to > > http://md.devc.at/software/mapreduce/bashreduce > > ? > > \rho > --------------020900030008000802050003-- From general-return-392-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 09:11:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24164 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 09:11:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 09:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 76335 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76264 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76254 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 09:12:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:12:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of parbash.project@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:12:16 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so839377fge.12 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:11:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EiZQ8bOCZLgePSBsJvJRb+d/4q0VbPzPSEnXpn2Jx6E=; b=Dv4/WdfyJO9u/eEUKbQMCraCj4qdeGlCoBG4Wsgp4B10ZYERl27hzbeu05GCm0SHxk bEUpVnVH+k8ImuxpjGW8Zy8aFTRmfBiEFgbdQrzURc2KafZnyQFbMbDBVqcV5ZYpEa7i H7HMgiQ1qcZBy4qprDgYPytov7ICdoLkD806k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Nwkrd7SuBr0bK953dKQvdxX99LGGBBBXqOwqSAFCVY4h0C5bq65MS8XjD47Gwd+/2W BDFmzdwa4q5Fu7pMxYwm41nj56Q03yZgPDjNGJ0j7EPq2hquZ2ZlBxOL2W3Tuxu9JAEG WTPIPOLrWEefFoFQJg5U0tC0/TKf++l9hwxnw= Received: by 10.86.89.6 with SMTP id m6mr4404250fgb.1.1248167515792; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from W852120CRG3.pwlan-swisscom.mobile.ch ([194.209.131.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm13718438fgb.26.2009.07.21.02.11.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A65865A.5090003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:11:54 +0200 From: Milenko Petrovic User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: ParBASH 0.1 release - Hadoop through BASH References: <4A648FF2.3080306@gmail.com> <20090720165201.GF26881@odman.int.devc.at> <4A657222.6000606@cloudera.com> In-Reply-To: <4A657222.6000606@cloudera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's right Amr. ParBASH is a modified bash interpreter which translates certain bash constructs into hadoop steaming jobs. With very small changes a parbash script can be made to run on hadoop or locally, which I find very handy while developing map-reduce jobs. Frequently, I need to do data cleaning, extraction and transformation on my input files before running my map-reduce jobs. I find it convenient to use shell tools (grep, awk, perl, etc) for this kind of thing. ParBASH tries to imitate unix shell-way of processing files, so I think it is a good fit for any scripting-based map-reduce job. -Milenko Amr Awadallah wrote: > > How does this related to [bashreduce] > > bashreduce has nothing to do with hadoop, it just implements a simple > version of the mapreduce framework using bash. It also doesn't have an > equivalent of HDFS (it relies on all the nodes having local copies or > access to a shared fs, or pass data using nc). > > ParBASH is a extension to bash which allows you to write a job as if > it was a bash script, and parbash takes care of translating that to a > hadoop streaming job (very clever) > > -- amr > > Robert Barta wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Milenko Petrovic wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'd like to announce the release of the 0.1 version of ParBASH. >>> Using ParBASH, it is possible to write bash scripts that are >>> automatically translated into Hadoop Streaming Jobs. >>> >> >> Milenko, >> >> How does this related to >> >> http://md.devc.at/software/mapreduce/bashreduce >> >> ? >> >> \rho >> > From general-return-393-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 12:22:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98658 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 12:22:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 12:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 98229 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 12:23:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98151 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 12:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98141 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 12:23:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:23:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com designates 167.1.158.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [167.1.158.29] (HELO cvgmx2.convergys.com) (167.1.158.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:23:35 +0000 Received: from CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com (CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com [155.90.28.181]) by cvgmx2.convergys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D885155D7D9 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:21:08 +0000 (UTC) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: hadoop tutorial documentation MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.3 September 14, 2004 Message-ID: From: anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:53:10 +0530 X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/21/2009 05:53:10 PM, Serialize by Notes Client on Anubhav Hanjura/CIMG/CVG(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/21/2009 05:53:10 PM, Serialize complete at 07/21/2009 05:53:10 PM, S/MIME Sign failed at 07/21/2009 05:53:10 PM: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 6.5.5FP3|March 22, 2007) at 07/21/2009 08:23:46 AM, Serialize complete at 07/21/2009 08:23:46 AM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00440A42652575FA_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 00440A42652575FA_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" I have downloaded the hadoop tutorial but am unable to search a term in case I need to. Is it possible to have a search box at top right corner to search the hadoop tutorial for terms? I hope it is not too much of an ask ;) Thanks for your consideration A.H --=_alternative 00440A42652575FA_=-- From general-return-394-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 03:52:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54383 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 03:52:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 03:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39680 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 03:53:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39609 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 03:53:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39599 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 03:53:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:53:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.205] (HELO mail-fx0-f205.google.com) (209.85.220.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:53:02 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so3064336fxm.29 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:52:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/CTbNjhs4D3/pjz+ibESoa+mcDKQac9h5FmYPwP+f80=; b=alAEb6TkIhaSUzowqEJbJqoXutSAoWonQtZiKafYPd/M5UhJUAM5YhTTvC+M1+B8ot FETRK1IUZNmf8Nh+bE1nMGNaaN5Gdadvymknt+mu1T6OQ+jFqZGtRtArEJcI+g403Tt7 EkaHyMbHS/U5DhHfbe8Iof+hj6ekBVQhw27uY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FbaFc3PAQIIl70TA6VRKtETKhHG65dDgo5luV9z23HVMtbD8IbGoasugrhua7G5hCC R9ZcOhMbCn0ytm7dUZi2QzxRQjgYcAaM53dLZ2eelDtbEK46VIV6YE36qKzu1/XRsdTG e8oNlBV6m56HH4zyJpW4aVC02YtBTKWxapG7w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.16 with SMTP id u16mr414583bkp.29.1248234760652; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: HadoopDB From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cfaf81464b046f434d8e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502cfaf81464b046f434d8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi - just saw this project mentioned on slashdot - what is the short version of the long story? Anybody using it? Any real world advantages/benefits? Should I consider using it? Any comment welcome. Thanks Nico Links: * Slashdot: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/21/1747241 * Blog: http://dbmsmusings.blogspot.com/2009/07/announcing-release-of-hadoopdb-longer.html --00504502cfaf81464b046f434d8e-- From general-return-395-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 16:43:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33616 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 16:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 16:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8056 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 16:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7976 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 16:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7966 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 16:44:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.183.249.146] (HELO mail.etracker.de) (85.183.249.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:44:22 +0000 Received: by mail.etracker.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id CD2FE4D8BD8; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:43:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.etracker.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from mail.etracker.local (unknown [85.183.249.129]) by mail.etracker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFD64D8B5C for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:43:55 +0200 (CEST) x-cr-puzzleid: {78D594D6-C572-4A51-8633-7D51742A1A71} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: HDFS Thrift method 'write' does not transfer bytes Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:43:47 +0200 x-cr-hashedpuzzle: ALxp AXb7 Am3F Behv CUnU DdKz Dp4R D/0k EOZp ElVc Eq27 GWXX HKkM H3+g H40+ J2F8;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{78D594D6-C572-4A51-8633-7D51742A1A71};awBhAGEAdAB6AEAAZQB0AHIAYQBjAGsAZQByAC4AYwBvAG0A;Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:43:47 GMT;SABEAEYAUwAgAFQAaAByAGkAZgB0ACAAbQBlAHQAaABvAGQAIAAnAHcAcgBpAHQAZQAnACAAZABvAGUAcwAgAG4AbwB0ACAAdAByAGEAbgBzAGYAZQByACAAYgB5AHQAZQBzAA== Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HDFS Thrift method 'write' does not transfer bytes Thread-Index: AcoK65VlAWGWozl/RzKsmUI6zvrhVg== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kaatz?= To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_60,RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Hi, I try to copy a local 'gz' file via the HDFS Thrift method 'write' to = HDFS. Unfortunately the method accepts only a 'String' as data and = converts this to UTF8. I need t transfer bytes for the gz file. Can anybody help me? Juergen From general-return-396-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 17:46:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61815 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 17:46:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 30202 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30162 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30152 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 17:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.65.145.78] (HELO p02c12o145.mxlogic.net) (208.65.145.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:47:18 +0000 Received: from unknown [63.251.237.3] (EHLO mtiexch01.mti.com) by p02c12o145.mxlogic.net (mxl_mta-6.3.0-1) with ESMTP id f80576a4.0.112938.00-012.235112.p02c12o145.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:46:57 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4a675091487ef7de-6bfc206df3fa7e2a74b0b50a6d9019ec61cc2368 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:46:54 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01EA6508@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Thread-Index: Acnve0D0Y5l5TcTYR9SYn3oB+wIKEgbeRlOw References: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01DDF27B@mtiexch01.mti.com> <94E98768-027B-464D-A738-5B74069D9291@apache.org> From: "Satish Kikkeri" To: Cc: "Dekel Tankel" X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2009071501)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [63.251.237.3] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=4iyT6hJci8cA:10 a=xupnbh4h0YLOHZnncC45HQ==:17 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=CbDCq_QkAAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=LbXv4wAxBhbhiPxzX6UA:9] X-AnalysisOut: [ a=0I8il_TIzbEhA2Cv264EMV6NRxUA:4 a=6bbpDATN3xAA:10 a=gQ22] X-AnalysisOut: [TatrZ4oA:10 a=mqKVMgZcPAkA:10 a=88iI8knYSJUA:10] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Do we have a meeting today or pushing it to next month ________________________________________________________________________ _______________ =20 Satish Kikkeri Mellanox Technologies 350 Oakmead Parkway, Sunnyvale, CA 94085 408-916-0045 (Direct) 408-807-9903 (Mobile) www.mellanox.com =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:39 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Dekel Tankel Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Satish Kikkeri wrote: > Is the next Hadoop UG meeting today (6/18) or next week (6/25) We just had the Hadoop Summit last week, so let's skip this month. I =20 expect that the Hadoop User Group meetings will resume next month. -- Owen From general-return-397-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 18:01:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70593 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 18:01:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 18:01:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 66335 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:02:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66291 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:02:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66281 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 18:02:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:02:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.80] (HELO QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:02:38 +0000 Received: from OMTA21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id K4xZ1c0091u4NiLA862Kgq; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:02:19 +0000 Received: from wifi-e-135-237.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.145]) by OMTA21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id K6271c00K381T1d8h62AZh; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:02:17 +0000 Cc: "Dekel Tankel" Message-Id: <12905811-764E-4746-97AA-76EBFE4A13E4@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01EA6508@mtiexch01.mti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:02:05 -0700 References: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01DDF27B@mtiexch01.mti.com> <94E98768-027B-464D-A738-5B74069D9291@apache.org> <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01EA6508@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Satish Kikkeri wrote: > Do we have a meeting today or pushing it to next month The next meeting is Aug 19th. Please RSVP at: http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/10877366/?action=detail&eventId=10877366 Thanks, Owen From general-return-398-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 15:43:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88171 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 15:43:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 15:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 65258 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 15:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65180 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 15:44:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65169 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 15:44:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:44:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.27] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:44:06 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so290409eye.35 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5pLnMXDZ088slJ9XrDBTnoYfGLKenoeMen2i6to0dh8=; b=Ziu6mbBBaUJ9BU5cVfyLjN90nKAHms5zLHLfwSaMPrSLf+YW8LsC+h8eYP2tbD3ZSL oyKmH/g03uoFhTKX6oeTouYqymFoqIicyTeeawEkYK9OP6EipQonGJ+apd41zesoX1UQ JD75NKhsMfxcGKgT8kknafS9DFkquZe9Vl6O0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xWc/euv3cntr/z/9n0Uvr2gur3mcgF98SkjSOpUWXLRk5V/FrX0uuzKr1rg2oSVEjN atzqCaHoUj3PZp05NxFxrVsaJxeQnl5UgdaxLGb3xK6NSPfqg3CWxID2JvmHZgxbVFgi dlAfJidjK5BKpa+63OgPhIG/xjxxjg1JfayXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.70 with SMTP id 48mr676081weg.74.1248363824894; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:43:44 +0200 Message-ID: <88f6e29a0907230843k7441c13cn46fb73a7739c361c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: More info on the "project split" From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I found this interesting posting: http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/07/17/the-project-split/ assumedly talking about Apache Hadoop, but I might be wrong on this. I tried to find more on the project's lists on this topic, but failed. Anybody can point me to the relevant discussion or proposals? Thanks, Bernd From general-return-399-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 22:18:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8335 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 22:18:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 22:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 22:19:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17068 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 22:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17058 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 22:19:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:19:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:19:05 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n6NMH2kL069247 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=Hbm5dFvyX6L9mq4Nh8iDwLVzrx9QKvXbzUsSkXxq0SFSmziBlXVtmZXOfttK6NNO Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:17:02 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:16:47 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:16:47 -0700 Subject: Edit link on jira. From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Edit link on jira. Thread-Index: AcoL40SbVvjD8x06U0qo/W3bKQF+3g== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2009 22:17:02.0516 (UTC) FILETIME=[4DDAFF40:01CA0BE3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HI all, Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was quite useful for minor spelling mistake changes like IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making spelling changes all over the comment) I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but would it be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor spelling changes (some ethics law)? Thanks mahadev From general-return-400-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 23:49:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31917 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 23:49:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 23:49:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 98449 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 23:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98374 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 23:50:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98364 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 23:50:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:50:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:50:45 +0000 Received: from coatsatfind-lm.corp.yahoo.com (coatsatfind-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.187.241]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n6NNnM70042469 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=o4qoGhHBE6b52tAqv3+0AbDrzlkjdT27kxDKi3/ISy35rhxjja7zefj8hti5AZkT Message-Id: <3E38BFE2-45B0-4AA6-94B4-E4D305096925@yahoo-inc.com> From: Hong Tang To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-29--497177324 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:49:22 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-29--497177324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > HI all, > Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was > quite useful > for minor spelling mistake changes like > > IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making > spelling changes all over the comment) > > I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but > would it > be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor > spelling changes (some ethics law)? > > > Thanks > mahadev > --Apple-Mail-29--497177324-- From general-return-401-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 06:27:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73952 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 06:27:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 06:27:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 44246 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 06:28:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44152 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 06:28:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44142 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 06:28:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:28:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.205] (HELO mail-fx0-f205.google.com) (209.85.220.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:28:23 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1280528fxm.29 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:28:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MkUP/Qpcx1RRft0G3wi/8jh3+HIS1R+39kkrTQi5is4=; b=tXbVe7pUNpugc0akSqUmRy7OorlzFQDLA+N5iGcwnGCQB7zIAUNbojnJrUw2+ppBoF UclpznpaaKjb+z8fnJaFFMhcxaLq7KYDVOxaGbnFTpWzKn14yHLpzQSUV/Xbzoo5i1M4 uuWRspqmKPPEXA3rgj7R21l3YFAFX8kkniZ6k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Du5IRrAYz/n1oQWch6iyGCg2jGh3MTBZhplUilHPsEOxjLZ7A403pqVIdKW9OmdtQ4 +ApZIZjnMf83/mYVIqJ+ikPfU5X0XmtVLlGLTLwnPOaFHWfd8w3vghBNTO3CckfVsuYr X61zJ75ImX0fMx+JXnkeQmuFaXsyZnlU12XSQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.53.143 with SMTP id m15mr2882251bkg.112.1248416881834; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:28:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ba67c5fccc046f6db4d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5ba67c5fccc046f6db4d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi - I keep on getting this message and although everything works I suppose I have to fix this at some point. The full error: 09/07/24 07:12:57 WARN conf.Configuration: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Usage of hadoop-site.xml is deprecated. Instead use core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml to override properties of core-default.xml, mapred-default.xml and hdfs-default.xml respectively My current hadoop-site.xml on my "master" node looks like this (in the section): hadoop.tmp.dir /tmp1 fs.default.name hdfs://node1:54310 mapred.job.tracker node1:54311 dfs.replication 3 I think the following: * hadoop.tmp.dir goes into core-site.xml * fs.default.name goes into core-site.xml * mapred.job.tracker goes into mapred-site.xml * dfs.replication goes into hdfs-site.xml Is this right? I also assume I can then remove hadoop-site.xml? Thanks Nico --001636c5ba67c5fccc046f6db4d6-- From general-return-402-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 08:57:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12452 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 08:57:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 08:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 16165 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 08:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16099 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 08:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16089 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 08:58:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:58:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:58:13 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n6O8vHxr093865 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:57:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=AQxA0o/GV8+hgfusvyNEuSEe4v3USVgjMphevKGWcb6MqlrDje72vZCLVKNXwOAs Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.186]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:57:17 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA0C3C.A085802C" Subject: Re: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:56:26 -0700 Message-ID: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Thread-Index: AcoMPKB0beVRT4BQT7qQFf/vNwzpVQ== From: "Sharad Agarwal" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2009 08:57:17.0345 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEE0B910:01CA0C3C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA0C3C.A085802C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nico Coetzee wrote: > I think the following: > > * hadoop.tmp.dir goes into core-site.xml > * fs.default.name goes into core-site.xml > * mapred.job.tracker goes into mapred-site.xml > * dfs.replication goes into hdfs-site.xml > > Is this right? I also assume I can then remove hadoop-site.xml? > =20 Right. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA0C3C.A085802C-- From general-return-403-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 10:58:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85654 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 10:58:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 10:58:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 53814 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:59:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53734 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53724 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 10:59:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pareekash@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.216.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:59:22 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so1154844pxi.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:59:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UoGINhEqn4zeuRHaZbLjSGiUMOZW/0ovF2J4KKy7D4E=; b=dO81hyYqVG3fRbEesFU4yeJcZBaBXrIPHeAhMw7Vq7BhQNz5nKomDSyJoa+FrYB3SJ qDOSSHPXPU57Cimx2vYjkmBTRvpYclNtGzZU2g/4OAvpOuS1GprLmU4BX9zNfKjRCxb3 XavxQUIoa4t5KLgsMFpRZsZZNq+ztoky8dZe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VNRajnFid0OjU2E/dD7wz+8h/t3OEyjUTUUaHSSxltXzen8ehH2lVqevQkG/+XFGKG xRZ2vDKDH+mMOHbi6UMG0um0RzVss/r/AID68CcXT/t1Dykiz60JEFaWL6ZgHoLijmY2 IRCIwuGOqVolEiVIWSm0TgaYT3SC87TKJJvsQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.192.14 with SMTP id p14mr4225768waf.136.1248433142470; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:59:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45d9159d0907240350l5dcd2920k9b3ecc022781a95e@mail.gmail.com> References: <45d9159d0907240350l5dcd2920k9b3ecc022781a95e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:29:02 +0530 Message-ID: <45d9159d0907240359o7d24c140p85c4b728e1d01b8f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: How Does Hadoop stores Meta Data information From: ashish pareek To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646c6f8fb9954046f717d3a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163646c6f8fb9954046f717d3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Everybody, From last few weeks I am trying to find out what data structure does Hadoop uses to store files and directories Meta-data information. If any one can point out the exact source file where this source code is, it will help me a lot. Thank you in advance. Regards, Ashish. --00163646c6f8fb9954046f717d3a-- From general-return-404-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 16:48:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17960 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 16:48:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 16:48:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29293 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 16:49:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29224 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 16:49:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29213 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 16:49:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:49:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:49:27 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n6OGlI0I072272 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:47:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=sA8kGCLx+7FHG48syGyLAeN1uureTsJOjNwbWp2Xd9tXUPCSD0rv0xd2hGB7Qo37 Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:47:18 -0700 From: Jerome Boulon To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:47:17 -0700 Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. Thread-Topic: Edit link on jira. Thread-Index: AcoL8JKL1IMRqAyVT5+t0a2S5g5HRAAjdSi9 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3E38BFE2-45B0-4AA6-94B4-E4D305096925@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C68F33A51F0D6jboulonyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C68F33A51F0D6jboulonyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On 7/23/09 4:49 PM, "Hong Tang" wrote: +1 On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > HI all, > Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was > quite useful > for minor spelling mistake changes like > > IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making > spelling changes all over the comment) > > I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but > would it > be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor > spelling changes (some ethics law)? > > > Thanks > mahadev > --_000_C68F33A51F0D6jboulonyahooinccom_-- From general-return-405-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 17:29:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33186 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 17:29:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 17:29:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 84046 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83996 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83986 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 17:30:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:30:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:29:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c245.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.245]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n6OHSie0089752 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:28:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=1ScSemCfquVzMo9hLego9au8FfCkQGmioNtWhaUFRsZSTSbmcDKgaN+KVscaPMFk Message-Id: <4443CF77-8311-4C2B-AB35-C2C2383570A3@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7--433614046 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:28:45 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-7--433614046 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > HI all, > Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was > quite useful > for minor spelling mistake changes like > > IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making > spelling changes all over the comment) > > I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but > would it > be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor > spelling changes (some ethics law)? > > > Thanks > mahadev > +1. --Apple-Mail-7--433614046-- From general-return-406-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 17:51:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43861 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 17:51:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 17:51:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8106 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8019 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8003 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 17:52:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.149] (HELO rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:52:34 +0000 Received: from [10.73.152.79] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c79.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.79]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n6OHq9Oc051152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A69F4C8.9060301@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:52:08 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4443CF77-8311-4C2B-AB35-C2C2383570A3@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4443CF77-8311-4C2B-AB35-C2C2383570A3@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Sanjay Radia wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > >> HI all, >> Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was quite >> useful >> for minor spelling mistake changes like >> >> IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making >> spelling changes all over the comment) >> >> I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but >> would it >> be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor >> spelling changes (some ethics law)? >> >> >> Thanks >> mahadev >> > > +1. From general-return-407-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 18:05:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51286 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 18:05:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 18:05:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 26472 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 18:06:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26383 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 18:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26373 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 18:06:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:06:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:06:22 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n6OI5Od7003190 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=UZvPC/dE0fuXNGYa1HeIMLRaSkb7mke1I7iwEIueZiSZZIFWx5Qr3cewGaTNJ9Jx Received: from SNV-EXVS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.225]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:05:24 -0700 Received: from 10.72.244.136 ([10.72.244.136]) by SNV-EXVS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.45]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:05:24 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:05:20 -0700 Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. From: Yiping Han To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Edit link on jira. Thread-Index: AcoL8JKL1IMRqAyVT5+t0a2S5g5HRAAjdSi9AAK50/M= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2009 18:05:24.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[514C7AE0:01CA0C89] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 7/24/09 9:47 AM, "Jerome Boulon" wrote: > +1 > > > On 7/23/09 4:49 PM, "Hong Tang" wrote: > > +1 > > On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > >> HI all, >> Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was >> quite useful >> for minor spelling mistake changes like >> >> IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making >> spelling changes all over the comment) >> >> I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but >> would it >> be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor >> spelling changes (some ethics law)? >> >> >> Thanks >> mahadev >> > > ---------------------- Yiping Han F-3140 (408)349-4403 yhan@yahoo-inc.com From general-return-408-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 23:31:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61056 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 23:31:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 23:31:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 97997 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 23:32:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97920 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 23:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97910 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 23:32:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.198.239] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:30 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so543266rvb.29 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.2.18 with SMTP id e18mr2722077rvi.195.1248478329623; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm7123028rvb.6.2009.07.24.16.32.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:31:47 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070905030000070203090509" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070905030000070203090509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -1 Comments on JIRA get sent out by email (and it is the email that we actually read), we shouldn't let people go back and edit comments in the same sense that it is not possible to go back and change an email once it is sent (editing comments also leads to many emails sent out further clogging our inboxes). Before we submit a comment, we should read it twice and correct the typos, then post it. Yiping Han wrote: > +1 > > > On 7/24/09 9:47 AM, "Jerome Boulon" wrote: > > >> +1 >> >> >> On 7/23/09 4:49 PM, "Hong Tang" wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >> >> >>> HI all, >>> Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was >>> quite useful >>> for minor spelling mistake changes like >>> >>> IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making >>> spelling changes all over the comment) >>> >>> I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but >>> would it >>> be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor >>> spelling changes (some ethics law)? >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> mahadev >>> >>> >> > > ---------------------- > Yiping Han > F-3140 > (408)349-4403 > yhan@yahoo-inc.com > > --------------070905030000070203090509-- From general-return-409-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 23:38:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62052 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 23:38:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 23:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2254 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 23:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2162 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 23:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2151 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 23:39:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:39:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:39:30 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.6] (UNKNOWN-10-72-168-153.yahoo.com [10.72.168.153] (may be forged)) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n6ONc5bM045587 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:38:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=AQA3YgCfTZjTAOZ335JA2bA9WF85Mz9nt+GMrIE8eYM3C/HTMkkybt0a/K002noY Message-Id: <3B65EFEA-2355-4EC6-B5A7-4CC390B3852D@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:38:05 -0700 References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I agree with Amr. -1 on editing comments. n. On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Amr Awadallah wrote: > -1 > > Comments on JIRA get sent out by email (and it is the email that we > actually read), we shouldn't let people go back and edit comments in > the same sense that it is not possible to go back and change an > email once it is sent (editing comments also leads to many emails > sent out further clogging our inboxes). > > Before we submit a comment, we should read it twice and correct the > typos, then post it. > > Yiping Han wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> On 7/24/09 9:47 AM, "Jerome Boulon" wrote: >> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> On 7/23/09 4:49 PM, "Hong Tang" wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >>> >>> >>>> HI all, >>>> Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was >>>> quite useful >>>> for minor spelling mistake changes like >>>> >>>> IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment >>>> making >>>> spelling changes all over the comment) >>>> >>>> I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but >>>> would it >>>> be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for >>>> minor >>>> spelling changes (some ethics law)? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> mahadev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> ---------------------- >> Yiping Han >> F-3140 (408)349-4403 >> yhan@yahoo-inc.com >> >> From general-return-410-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 00:47:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85659 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 00:47:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 00:47:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 46687 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 00:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46614 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 00:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46600 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 00:48:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:48:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:48:07 +0000 Received: from [10.72.244.181] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c181.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n6P0lgN3067307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:47:42 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> In-Reply-To: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As I understand it until recently we were able to edit comments, for some reason it was changed. People found editing comments useful in certain circumstances. 1) has editing of comments been a problem for the hadoop community -- were people misusing this? 2) email IS sent on every JIRA comment, including edits to comments. The community can therefore review any edit, if there's an issue (misuse) it can be rectified. Given 1 & 2 I don't see why we should make a change to disallow comment editing at this time. Patrick Amr Awadallah wrote: > -1 > > Comments on JIRA get sent out by email (and it is the email that we > actually read), we shouldn't let people go back and edit comments in the > same sense that it is not possible to go back and change an email once > it is sent (editing comments also leads to many emails sent out further > clogging our inboxes). > > Before we submit a comment, we should read it twice and correct the > typos, then post it. > > Yiping Han wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> On 7/24/09 9:47 AM, "Jerome Boulon" wrote: >> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> On 7/23/09 4:49 PM, "Hong Tang" wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Jul 23, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >>> >>> >>>> HI all, >>>> Looks like we got rid of the edit link on jira. I think it was >>>> quite useful >>>> for minor spelling mistake changes like >>>> >>>> IF instead of IS..... (now I have to repost the whole comment making >>>> spelling changes all over the comment) >>>> >>>> I am sure there must have been a valid reason for removing it but >>>> would it >>>> be possible to reinstate it and use it for editing comments for minor >>>> spelling changes (some ethics law)? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> mahadev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> ---------------------- >> Yiping Han >> F-3140 (408)349-4403 >> yhan@yahoo-inc.com >> >> > From general-return-411-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 03:34:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30805 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 03:34:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 03:34:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 29446 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 03:35:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29335 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 03:35:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29325 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 03:35:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:35:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:35:47 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2705065qyk.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKBsXscXUZrzwhdc4BkXJPmI/oH5SZ4g66rzONGoK/I=; b=JtRrFsBLMkESFcQy6BJ+zl8K7A2SRbEq8gucnvOvIjHI1re39Duu1uII3HTDeNfX0S 0FADIaZFUQrIYqvfSo9LjgQ/Spl0rSUUDJWRWmuCFEm6/1S1ioASqmZNhsjlkX+3BnaX zM2SEVrozt8LH7bR440sHFjVLsVqHAhIDB/rA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fLSriZq2sG9mHae0ZCatHvYm80Z1lm7eOdC1ZtaEGKYaWC4o5Qpbmjd0e57Dfx4wfl e5kUtpa7houBVNq+Ccl4oOAo2ivgMkuMDMywkgBTCWhlozY/6sqlexdkoj/KycpbR8fa hhN4jA0F9hs/0mjJc26midsDhgVlMBhWq30fM= Received: by 10.224.2.69 with SMTP id 5mr4033786qai.367.1248492926871; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.90.4? (pool-71-246-212-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.212.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm6098205qwd.42.2009.07.24.20.35.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6A7D7C.8030202@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:35:24 -0400 From: Christopher L Tubbs II User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: mapreduce classpath issue References: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, I've been having an issue running on Mac OS, with classpath for MapReduce jobs on version 0.20.0 The basic idea is that I want to add a jar as a dependency to a MapReduce job. I know I can add the jar to HADOOP_CLASSPATH, but I do not have access to hadoop-env.xml (administrator restricted). I have been using the "hadoop jar" command to execute a class with a main() contained within my jar. My class extends Configured and implements Tool. The main() calls ToolRunner.run() to launch the job, and I specify -libjars on the command line, which I see from the source, uses the GenericOptionsParser to strip the "-libjars x.jar,y.jar,z.jar" from the arguments passed to my class. I then get errors that I can't find classes contained within my library jars. >From within run(), my debugging code demonstrates that the jar files are readable, and I can getResource() to verify that the classes are available in those jars. However, I still get errors, because it doesn't seem that at any point, the JVM is using the contextClassLoader that the resources were added with. Perhaps this is a bug with Mac OS's JVM 1.6, or am I doing something wrong? Everything works fine in linux with the identical setup. - Chris From general-return-412-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 03:36:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30919 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 03:36:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 03:36:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30219 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 03:37:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30133 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 03:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30121 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 03:37:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:37:30 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2705622qyk.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:37:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/64nImPkfDIFwwubVYdZ8hU2jQVY5hDUWvjssQh5Nhg=; b=jEqsSTCKEQSYQDSz9FHKll7mw9wEJXVD2RN5mKK37q3vCQQLC3Z0kHgib9M/l3In7K V/irGqKsuGM426qy1cphbeDEb/Rh2NQIYLS5nGnG6NXB72Ue060rcYU47ZomkUlICpHN 8G0zE8a9IIRYc55U18BHFv+xqiYCWGz9cUy7o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=LmNQ8CnTCeCKSODfK9+9beYOWBbo5eLQAbeicJtiCshhoYaFqIoNCIK3WK300114lx 81AFkVhNuktQ5EolLKMOJvfWlHIFVYtjwJaGK1uraJnFthpu2UQxkS0Iy2ESCMd6C1xs SGJxDL3Bm0DEYVO/8xQ7nzNoMF3FhY9E1Ix0g= Received: by 10.224.53.196 with SMTP id n4mr4135706qag.43.1248493029446; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.90.4? (pool-71-246-212-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.212.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm24016qwk.34.2009.07.24.20.37.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6A7DE3.7020405@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:37:07 -0400 From: Christopher L Tubbs II User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. References: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I had similar questions. Where can I find documentation that shows which 0.19.x hadoop-site.xml options go in which of these 3 files, and at what point are these files accessed (i.e. why are there now 3?). What happened to the example/default config files for these three? Sharad Agarwal wrote: > Nico Coetzee wrote: >> I think the following: >> >> * hadoop.tmp.dir goes into core-site.xml >> * fs.default.name goes into core-site.xml >> * mapred.job.tracker goes into mapred-site.xml >> * dfs.replication goes into hdfs-site.xml >> >> Is this right? I also assume I can then remove hadoop-site.xml? >> > > > Right. > From general-return-413-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 12:52:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56441 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 12:52:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 12:52:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26018 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 12:53:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25942 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 12:53:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61811 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 22:42:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.218 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dmcA3hgTM6u7ljFiTJAk9GHWt5DGA6jwLgIzgvvg5eY=; b=ryZLJRVdR8oBIR7K3sgAM6itOpIh+YcpcT3Puvv3wKnrx4eLpoID6eYn+R5owSS1zZ ozj8PttHkinkWLbm1/hlCgEv/wcjuIumO25QEAUK+TIqDiOTdwDkTsC1MFdsoBjhODxD IK2Cpu2zxM2/E1Q1QYqO9ecOFWtIcOJPyWO9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tAyVUwzTdI8Z/d5I3fDwFzE09hoZJ+bFIY/w371lsE+e2Ddk0j/QB0m4EMcT6OiugT hA/3A/ZP75ghT0zdVWejfU9xrcR2AudYrfTN75SdvU775jpZxN/kDiOSHhV4qC/qLYtP oz8w5LYkfrMTQP3Sif5Lys1nt2woNS9+B5z8c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:42:13 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10907241542t454a95fdv5abacce56905568@mail.gmail.com> Subject: August 7-9, San Francisco: Announcing HBase User Group meeting & Hackathon From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Announcing the next HBase User Group meeting, being held on Friday August the 7th at 4pm. The location is Stumbleupon's office at 140 Second Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco. Come talk and learn about HBase 0.20. RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/calendar/10950511/ Following the user group meeting on Saturday & Sunday (August 8th and 9th) is the HBase 0.21 hackathon! Come talk features, design and code for the next major version of HBase! RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hackathon/calendar/10951718/ Regards, -ryan From general-return-414-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 26 00:06:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30997 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2009 00:06:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2009 00:06:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 86920 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 00:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86856 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 00:08:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86846 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2009 00:08:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:08:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:07:54 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so2063800bwz.29 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:07:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CZZI2kFi7UIDljg2+OhURrwCyuBDHpkivm3VCOl7M5A=; b=D+Ud6TbAd/zHoE82ccayo3KqGZEZFgJz4kFi/1Jn4njMXBzziXz8QT5IBELYdDWiBE cgHq5j/dwKx9MlKCM8zFf+pA79wzmcmDBQbtBiFnHrPjvCZJSfHKjeEgHFTxXGX2n5MD bAOy0bRDu53skgKgSLBxM06OmyFsdgED3Tqak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jPjZgu3RViOD4eikocrbW2amfu6ypr19vam5Tlgq3YADI4nVWCGZKLgOg4euuebPQn rxrcp4qXGOKLYlx6LjvxuMb6zaKd/ekS44nNh8Y7kWK1XuMWegAYH1PFJZCeDf975AUk 9n0OZyZ47wUvmyoF2FxUAiNRxoopPUbiEdUXw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.16 with SMTP id g16mr1417894bki.37.1248566852667; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:07:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A6A7DE3.7020405@gmail.com> References: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <4A6A7DE3.7020405@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:07:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6ddfff6bb4a80046f909f19 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6ddfff6bb4a80046f909f19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I basically looked at the following docs: * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs-default.html * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred-default.html I searched for the relevant parameter names in each. Hope that helps. BTW - I do think we need some better docs in explaining how the ocnfig files work together, sequence of events etc. Cheers Nico On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Christopher L Tubbs II wrote: > I had similar questions. Where can I find documentation that shows which > 0.19.x hadoop-site.xml options go in which of these 3 files, and at what > point are these files accessed (i.e. why are there now 3?). What > happened to the example/default config files for these three? > > Sharad Agarwal wrote: > > Nico Coetzee wrote: > >> I think the following: > >> > >> * hadoop.tmp.dir goes into core-site.xml > >> * fs.default.name goes into core-site.xml > >> * mapred.job.tracker goes into mapred-site.xml > >> * dfs.replication goes into hdfs-site.xml > >> > >> Is this right? I also assume I can then remove hadoop-site.xml? > >> > > > > > > Right. > > > --0016e6ddfff6bb4a80046f909f19-- From general-return-415-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 14:52:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56646 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 14:52:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 14:52:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 87321 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 14:53:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87260 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 14:53:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87250 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 14:53:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:53:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:53:07 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so5640865yxe.5 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2C2Jc8f4o5t3OHFTTHBTp8eYJkoLP+bpHTsed0gk+JY=; b=HX9qkPEMc/WNsADG4XnQa96bdEFv2j/ilKXjkaRy1THl0VlpFqUqk3vTrRZR9gbI73 FyvA2sskLq5VVUc+8/RRGgmWTtsd7NDN1q8rwq1hcArkyBMSkyl3Nlfs3MoO/R87efmB uYkevnyA0e96Y3xZl2uqCpJISUKN/M05FuRbY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=STk5diO8zmfZAus2hs381TlCdo+0NeLGxvJ18J9Wmx22YP8P4agzNC59z1eTEDiv41 lfXoQVJKdxpkXQYX4shl+G91y7idKW8B+f9IdEXSwZMD1T1f4t5X80kjNmwMLBTUDkU8 WvqcrMPuAm8s4LYZ8po0aOCEXQlgev+i9Ns1I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.157.15 with SMTP id j15mr11272163ybo.329.1248706366440; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:52:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:52:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70907270752i4942bfxb97031c93571cc2d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HDFS Thrift method 'write' does not transfer bytes From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174ff5e86684b6046fb11b83 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174ff5e86684b6046fb11b83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe you are right. It might help to check out the Thrift documentatio= n at http://wiki.apache.org/thrift/ and then enhance the hadoop.thriftfs API to store/retrieve bytes. thanks dhruba 2009/7/22 J=FCrgen Kaatz > Hi, > > I try to copy a local 'gz' file via the HDFS Thrift method 'write' to HDF= S. > Unfortunately the method accepts only a 'String' as data and converts thi= s > to UTF8. I need t transfer bytes for the gz file. > > Can anybody help me? > > Juergen > > --0015174ff5e86684b6046fb11b83-- From general-return-416-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 18:01:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56669 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 18:01:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:01:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 50928 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50847 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50837 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 18:02:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:02:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:02:47 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so2833576bwz.29 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:02:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2ypFKg7Y+r/1XbI7YIv72895ryN2nPcztwES7qorsqE=; b=YUKK5ygKXpxTYPA334oi4VWfIDPeJpaWjgWe0DTTAsD/AWxqLc6aOGAW4ODfdA6F+J G0YyxT+e/0zg9eRcFpunzbDSYswtzQLECQS2eYvbrdofvARbYRqKJwCZ5ivqVjLBOd+s KfQ8X9PXF/NEg7kIgRF5kGZ4M653+l4/zcJpk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aH4kvK2E7nDS83yAJSHzfOSUsJ09dkEEvPQGKtyQmW0wmAwrjYKloGiFcrn7W/L2Op jEphfTrZ4fU/vW/0nJ58IY7pLJnkPxFg5vUBZU/O1ysQLoVKr37tV7ws0W4Bh4yNpLk0 LMm3ScmUQIJz2Vt3KVi5/ahZK0Vfzlh78kLzo= Received: by 10.103.182.1 with SMTP id j1mr3373406mup.119.1248717746533; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-183-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.183.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm28773904mug.39.2009.07.27.11.02.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A6DEBAB.1010205@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:02:19 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Patrick Hunt wrote: > As I understand it until recently we were able to edit comments, for > some reason it was changed. This change was presented here: http://www.mail-archive.com/core-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg42904.html > 1) has editing of comments been a problem for the hadoop community -- > were people misusing this? For folks who follow issues by email, a small change requires that one re-read the entire edited comment, since Jira's diffs are useless. Folks were frequently editing long comments making it very difficult to determine what change had been made. It's better to make a new comment amending one's prior comment. I have long argued against editing Jira comments. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute See the "Jira Guidelines" near the end of the page. This was added in 2007. Doug From general-return-417-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 18:29:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76833 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 18:29:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 80328 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:30:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80253 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:30:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80239 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 18:30:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:30:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:30:24 +0000 Received: from [10.72.244.16] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c16.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n6RITqrl003295 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6DF221.5030408@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:29:53 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> <4A6DEBAB.1010205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6DEBAB.1010205@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Perhaps I misunderstood the scope of this discussion - is it general Hadoop or specific to some subset of Hadoop projects? Regardless, at this time the ZooKeeper community would prefer to continue supporting edits on comments. Patrick Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> As I understand it until recently we were able to edit comments, for >> some reason it was changed. > > This change was presented here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/core-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg42904.html > >> 1) has editing of comments been a problem for the hadoop community -- >> were people misusing this? > > For folks who follow issues by email, a small change requires that one > re-read the entire edited comment, since Jira's diffs are useless. Folks > were frequently editing long comments making it very difficult to > determine what change had been made. It's better to make a new comment > amending one's prior comment. > > I have long argued against editing Jira comments. > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute > > See the "Jira Guidelines" near the end of the page. This was added in > 2007. > > Doug From general-return-418-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 18:47:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85656 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 18:47:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:47:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 8206 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8129 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8075 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 18:48:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:48:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:48:40 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so2863769bwz.29 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j4p9Ne4AHfPEjsoU5Wk6h9ON0MbtnWinAoHoTm97Xs8=; b=suuFqqhfatgxNVkL39jdiBhJ+t5VZ6HeaPU1vRvS8kU3okOjTbVElaj2Wm8kXb6dHy LfHjdr1z6tSIDE6DTVTIcl6WbnD9eAh85ZF7OmdqSlw3tSOWlOommKqH9HAgztXi3Oz8 JwvJ+S8ct30st8bJ38hyyJALrHpT7uMO0Y5oA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mZ7MSRgeK3S9UQh/PIhi9Q2WzD+WF9hu7yUK/+3SgHmyf20W2CoKwNVe24XtEa9JBd 7qIr/QNoKVcKkk2qjTGc2GDvBfPO1mEffr/nMJsuUvufCpJ8RRNRIcvf13xVbWpCs3xq r7hW87Fqb4r9q9QHkl5zkZM7XI/4W6DBXMY6o= Received: by 10.103.131.8 with SMTP id i8mr3481047mun.124.1248720499219; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-183-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.183.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u26sm29562397mug.22.2009.07.27.11.48.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A6DF66D.1020402@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:48:13 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> <4A6DEBAB.1010205@apache.org> <4A6DF221.5030408@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6DF221.5030408@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Patrick Hunt wrote: > Perhaps I misunderstood the scope of this discussion - is it general > Hadoop or specific to some subset of Hadoop projects? Regardless, at > this time the ZooKeeper community would prefer to continue supporting > edits on comments. All Hadoop sub-projects currently share a single Jira permission scheme. Jira permission schemes are only alterable by Jira-wide administrators I think, and each TLP has only a few of those. Owen & I are I believe the only Jira-wide admins for the Hadoop TLP. So it might be impractical to use a custom permission scheme per subproject. If the ZooKeeper community wishes, I suppose we might switch ZooKeeper's Jira to the Apache standard permission scheme, which does permit comment editing. Doug From general-return-419-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 19:00:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90051 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 19:00:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 19:00:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28201 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28187 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:02:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:01:56 +0000 Received: from [10.72.244.16] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c16.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n6RJ1UBX005709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A6DF98A.1060400@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:01:30 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Edit link on jira. References: <4A6A4463.60002@cloudera.com> <4A6A562E.9030404@apache.org> <4A6DEBAB.1010205@apache.org> <4A6DF221.5030408@apache.org> <4A6DF66D.1020402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6DF66D.1020402@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hrm, thanks for the feedback. I'll investigate the scheme options with Owen/yourself offline. Patrick Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Perhaps I misunderstood the scope of this discussion - is it general >> Hadoop or specific to some subset of Hadoop projects? Regardless, at >> this time the ZooKeeper community would prefer to continue supporting >> edits on comments. > > All Hadoop sub-projects currently share a single Jira permission scheme. > > Jira permission schemes are only alterable by Jira-wide administrators I > think, and each TLP has only a few of those. Owen & I are I believe the > only Jira-wide admins for the Hadoop TLP. So it might be impractical to > use a custom permission scheme per subproject. > > If the ZooKeeper community wishes, I suppose we might switch ZooKeeper's > Jira to the Apache standard permission scheme, which does permit comment > editing. > > Doug From general-return-420-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 00:27:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53515 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 00:27:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 00:27:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 9047 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 00:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8562 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 00:27:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8284 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 00:27:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:27:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.211.200] (HELO mail-yw0-f200.google.com) (209.85.211.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:27:24 +0000 Received: by ywh38 with SMTP id 38so1320091ywh.20 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:27:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.87.5 with SMTP id k5mr1374846agb.46.1249000022184; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:27:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:26:42 -0700 Message-ID: <69035570907301726t51d298fcjff62162cd309bf7c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Extending Submission Deadline for Hadoop Fans on the East Coast To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362837a8a59440046ff57a4a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016362837a8a59440046ff57a4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop Fans, we have had a few requests to extend the submission deadline through the weekend. To be fair, rather than make exceptions, we wanted to let everyone know we are accepting proposals until August 3rd at 10AM PDT. We've also been really impressed with the number of international registrations we've seen. It's a continual reminder that Hadoop is a world-wide phenomenon, and as such, we'd like to encourage this further with a more inclusive name for the event, Hadoop World: NYC 2009. Lastly, we now have a much better idea of how much this will event cost to put on. NYC is expensive. We're keeping the early registration price at $150 until July 31st, 11PM PDT, but it will be $200 through August 10th, and $299 after we start promoting the event more actively. You'll find everything you need here: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-world-nyc Christophe and the Cloudera Team -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera --0016362837a8a59440046ff57a4a-- From general-return-421-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 16:58:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45240 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 16:58:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 16:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 54890 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 16:58:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54843 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 16:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54829 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 16:58:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:58:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.149] (HELO rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:57:51 +0000 Received: from [172.21.149.156] (nat-dip10.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n6VGvRKu048037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A732277.4050704@apache.org> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:57:27 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hudson issue with m/r patch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI: I had to kill this process: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Mapreduce/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/431/ it was running for > 18hrs and showed no sign of stopping any time soon. Patrick From general-return-422-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 22:50:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78790 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 39224 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39137 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39119 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:50:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:49:48 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n6VMmt16072979; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=nrkL+K4is8MTvwCBcw7dku8yDxWxvkgyFymOiyAXM3aGyym/oM8pV3lzqANzGd31 Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:48:55 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:48:53 -0700 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Aug 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Aug 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLg== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91SP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91SP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I'd like to remind everyone that RSVP is open for the next monthly Bay Area= Hadoop user group organized by Yahoo!. Agenda and registration available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/10877366/?action=3Ddetail&eventId=3D1= 0877366 In light of the recently announced search deal with Microsoft, I would = like to point you to Eric's blog post around Yahoo's strong and on-going co= mmitment to Hadoop and its community - http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/had= oop/2009/07/news_flash_hadoop_development.html Looking forward to seeing you at August 19th Dekel --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91SP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-3591-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 20:27:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F5CA6757 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99403 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:27:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99086 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:27:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98937 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 20:27:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:27:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:27:49 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p51KR8tn063026 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:27:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1306960028; bh=wE1FmRPeeY8rI7AwEzUeQc92yXKGbCFCeYeCUwmpP0g=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=UBb0S/IrtjbQEUp2PVJWtjuUFvJEHbeWd+rbDNCvXjjyKRmrsKNg7c+Zjwt3FnUn5 CeHf9jHMNDwETvlX94fCXfe8OjXavPswSGh2Z/QA94YaY9rYxXvB5Z5BhleqbHSNQ0 QOf5TtQlLq2EsMwYx+KOfcQbItD0bSZCOhMk40uc= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:27:07 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:27:05 -0700 Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 Thread-Topic: Update on 0.22 Thread-Index: AcwbcMvgWMMHX8T7R2SeRcODL6hYngFKXmgj Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1F63BF19-F939-432C-9B77-8ADC4731A05E@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Nigel, I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 from trunk= . >From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be approved by vote. Is this correct? Regards, Suresh On 5/25/11 11:46 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > Looks like we're down to 12 blockers on 0.22. >=20 > * Thanks to Cloudera for hosting a couple hack-a-thons over the past coup= le of > weeks which helped get this number down. > * Thanks to Devaraj Das for volunteering to get > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178 committed. > * Thanks to Tom White for getting a CI build running that creates the act= ual > release artifact. >=20 > I'm planning to commit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 = (SVN > reorg) this Friday at 2pm PDT. Todd, were you able to test git history b= ased > on your svn dump and import? >=20 > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-3592-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 20:46:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6673625F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56900 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:46:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56839 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56831 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 20:46:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:46:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:46:49 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so133207pzk.35 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.128.15 with SMTP id a15mr1144196wfd.354.1306961187913; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm1371130pbj.94.2011.06.01.13.46.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:46:24 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 from = trunk. > =46rom my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be = approved by > vote. Is this correct? No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a release. = The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. -- Owen= From general-return-3593-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 20:51:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 815C86D20 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71228 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:51:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71186 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 20:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71177 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 20:51:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:51:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:51:12 +0000 Received: from host136.benchmark.com (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c1.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.1]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p51KoY57070182 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1306961434; bh=3N2cOKeO84G4HeHausqnQfnpNk5RoxGnYbljF1O7lr0=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=PU3uOY+UFbiiMCW2qSci/I+riVsfBD8MuPrbno+eAL450SfeUi8FIvtF9UqpoF93c DI1hIkCCfvKBJ9Ns7zPb/BwsNw0WC9X7CUCdXpx0DEkBtK6pk2l1+l3CmpH0OUMpTV 0MzYw/v9bZwUm7GwMxpnjY631mBugvAfjCE/qWSw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:50:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these decisions = visible so folks can understand what is happening. On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >=20 >> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 from = trunk. >> =46rom my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be = approved by >> vote. Is this correct? >=20 > No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a = release. The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-3594-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 21:17:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F1B260A4 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11998 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11941 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:17:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11933 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 21:17:20 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:17:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:17:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:17:18 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these = decisions visible so folks can understand what is happening. lol From general-return-3595-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 22:02:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 340DF60A8 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93761 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93720 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93712 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 22:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:02:06 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so369220wyb.35 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:01:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.15.137 with SMTP id f9mr7543066wef.62.1306965706031; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:01:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:01:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these decisions visible so folks can understand what is happening. Hopefully people are updating the fix version in jira to be 0.22 for anything they are merging. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3596-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:33:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB33C4F6C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50775 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:33:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50670 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50662 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:33:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:33:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:32:57 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so354074gwj.35 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:32:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1H7BLRKTL1N0v3k+0DxH2zEHMm7fcMrtpC87Icu5oV4=; b=CxHDEngA3FRPqDk5HUXSX5ycy4kqOANoX77P7Hn76sNIuyEt6z4D6b3qBwwSjTLfYr JsX5dZdyVhyn4YEnK8yyfp4p18TNTNDMXFmHkR7230of4n9YGIhlZJgF2cPe0Q477mwa urQ9vomn26QwZbxvQOsIP+hHdMZn30ozlso5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vQnwKMzMOrGqy23AJJHHeXBOzOzQPsp+t8hqK5Yqglj3/+hGrXU4DaWEGrEFoBeGlT MCjkOA0RkxU60kRd1WSNufrkCjyAmzlk9A8c2Yadk8epKdDGHjg9An73h8fFQBfzC1zJ PUmd7CotTdjib5Z2MteEWo5r17xAPcvM5p1NE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.100.10 with SMTP id x10mr322579ybb.190.1306996356594; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.33.13 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:32:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:32:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2a0088ebafa04a4b4cdfc --000e0cd2a0088ebafa04a4b4cdfc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I can see them well. I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. Nigel, do you have full control over it? Thanks, --Konstantin On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these decisions > visible so folks can understand what is happening. > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > > > >> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 from > trunk. > >> From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be approved > by > >> vote. Is this correct? > > > > No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a release. > The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. > > > > -- Owen > > --000e0cd2a0088ebafa04a4b4cdfc-- From general-return-3597-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:12:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF3424DF1 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72176 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72092 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72078 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:12:22 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so589150ewy.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.28.200 with SMTP id g50mr905133wea.92.1307034720472; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:12:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS projects. We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. Welcome aboard atm! Thanks, Eli From general-return-3598-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:40:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 746F04655 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22815 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:40:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22716 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22708 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:40:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:40:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:40:27 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1979498bwz.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.224 with SMTP id c32mr971593bkl.161.1307036406324; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:39:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8eb8b51eb004a4be20ca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dd8eb8b51eb004a4be20ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I can see them well. > I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. > Nigel, do you have full control over it? > Of course it's up to Nigel to decide, but here's my personal opinion: One of the reasons we had a lot of divergence (read: external branches/forks/whatever) off of 0.20 is that the commit rules on the branch were held pretty strictly. So, if you wanted a non-critical bug fix or a small improvement, the only option was to do such things on an external fork. 0.20 was branched in December '08 and not released until mid April '09. In 4 months a fair number of bug fixes and small improvements go in. 0.22 has been around even longer. If we were to keep it to *only* blockers, then again it would be a fairly useless release due to the number of non-blocker bugs. Clearly there's a balance and a judgment call when moving things back to a branch. But at this point I'd consider small improvements and pretty much any bug fix to be reasonable, so long as it doesn't involve major reworking of components. Nigel: if this assumption doesn't jive (ha ha, get it?) with what you're thinking, please let me know :) -Todd > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >wrote: > > > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these decisions > > visible so folks can understand what is happening. > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > > > > > >> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 from > > trunk. > > >> From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be > approved > > by > > >> vote. Is this correct? > > > > > > No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a release. > > The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6dd8eb8b51eb004a4be20ca-- From general-return-3599-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:51:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C421E44D7 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45339 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:51:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45279 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45271 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:51:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:51:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:51:13 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so705588pve.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.156.17 with SMTP id d17mr153436wfe.11.1307037052122; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.185.10 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:50:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:20:32 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations Aaron On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS > projects. =A0We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project > so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. =A0Welcome > aboard atm! > > Thanks, > Eli > --=20 Harsh J From general-return-3600-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:03:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7047A499F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73699 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73638 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:03:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73630 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:03:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:03:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:03:28 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3143921qyk.14 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:03:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=gtNOB63gjCLF4v+gO7k6FDTzKjNCFJ7+ti9Yj0naum4=; b=QkoeGdRiUtuJ//1U5yxvWANAZObkBH0rec9Jo1b/EoFXxZGsx8/VLnquXdNOYYZy40 48pZ2UFBzA+HLlyCDoEV8RhhqLkaI41jZ5UTSwwFd77NFR5FkDQiyiXRaAFX603SN35y j84gXgunMApBd3Qo1Bqr+qIlHi2H+dd4oe0vA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=VI5onBDboQ5Qm/UY3UFsjNktSbdEqy6n+lurI1eEFtyhSrchgT97pj/NmM+7dmnBTn oGO42HJLdNrSsZ3iCWxY/Lgh/keU2sGbc5xIbCvPtl25u35oG21pYAU0yAyHKf4TXLFz /5hDF+hyjSxabCS3D9HRMdOFdi22U8s2VI5Yg= Received: by 10.224.9.2 with SMTP id j2mr772851qaj.57.1307037786390; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.180.150.116] (h-64-236-128-40.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i34sm498795qck.31.2011.06.02.11.03.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:03:01 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org would it make sense to start a 0.22.1 for those kind of features when = the 0.22.0 release gets closer? On Jun 2, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: >=20 >> I can see them well. >> I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. >> Nigel, do you have full control over it? >>=20 >=20 > Of course it's up to Nigel to decide, but here's my personal opinion: >=20 > One of the reasons we had a lot of divergence (read: external > branches/forks/whatever) off of 0.20 is that the commit rules on the = branch > were held pretty strictly. So, if you wanted a non-critical bug fix or = a > small improvement, the only option was to do such things on an = external > fork. 0.20 was branched in December '08 and not released until mid = April > '09. In 4 months a fair number of bug fixes and small improvements go = in. > 0.22 has been around even longer. If we were to keep it to *only* = blockers, > then again it would be a fairly useless release due to the number of > non-blocker bugs. >=20 > Clearly there's a balance and a judgment call when moving things back = to a > branch. But at this point I'd consider small improvements and pretty = much > any bug fix to be reasonable, so long as it doesn't involve major = reworking > of components. Nigel: if this assumption doesn't jive (ha ha, get it?) = with > what you're thinking, please let me know :) >=20 > -Todd >=20 >=20 >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler = >> wrote: >>=20 >>> makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these = decisions >>> visible so folks can understand what is happening. >>>=20 >>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 = from >>> trunk. >>>>> =46rom my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be >> approved >>> by >>>>> vote. Is this correct? >>>>=20 >>>> No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a = release. >>> The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. >>>>=20 >>>> -- Owen >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3601-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:07:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 503884F4A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80984 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80819 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80811 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:07:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:07:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:06:59 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so686583gwj.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:06:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ckNt8q/PcVX+7HSzOQbRNsxLv2AEP1kGdb8S7ngl1s0=; b=Ydf0bDEl8DKuX8aIVWXoowC3VvVf6WXvlU6y6Qota23t5W1hKuQEAVC7XF9UdjNDbX 9IJiOPaG9hWVgOZwRBxS3W0706PhpyoZQSkG0oFXrgH0vrWmoTCvFJqex91EKJ9rhWhk 2xZgQxu2u6PW7GxelGEkFD0vd03nCBZfgazvc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nRlDJsvU0oW2jkyZKEQpqDVZ77ydM+gaKGrJ42tqny4TLHM66qaB20G63vuxIwulCi rHo5Jc5kNh4OVaUgcensF9w1djEoQB4ytYB86PUBHppE39W1LWZQfsAJxLXT+xATE+b6 WxjXP+U9X8CUgm1Z25oogGefs0yiIuvXMHrJA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.187.18 with SMTP id k18mr1121049ybf.19.1307037998343; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.33.13 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:06:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:06:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6a84099682f04a4be7fdc --000e0cd6a84099682f04a4be7fdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I propose just to make them blockers before committing to attract attention of the release manager and get his approval. Imho, even small changes, like HDFS-1954 are blockers, because a vague UI message is bug and bugs are blockers. Thanks, --Konstantin On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > > I can see them well. > > I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. > > Nigel, do you have full control over it? > > > > Of course it's up to Nigel to decide, but here's my personal opinion: > > One of the reasons we had a lot of divergence (read: external > branches/forks/whatever) off of 0.20 is that the commit rules on the branch > were held pretty strictly. So, if you wanted a non-critical bug fix or a > small improvement, the only option was to do such things on an external > fork. 0.20 was branched in December '08 and not released until mid April > '09. In 4 months a fair number of bug fixes and small improvements go in. > 0.22 has been around even longer. If we were to keep it to *only* blockers, > then again it would be a fairly useless release due to the number of > non-blocker bugs. > > Clearly there's a balance and a judgment call when moving things back to a > branch. But at this point I'd consider small improvements and pretty much > any bug fix to be reasonable, so long as it doesn't involve major reworking > of components. Nigel: if this assumption doesn't jive (ha ha, get it?) with > what you're thinking, please let me know :) > > -Todd > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler < > eric14@yahoo-inc.com > > >wrote: > > > > > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these decisions > > > visible so folks can understand what is happening. > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > > >> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 > from > > > trunk. > > > >> From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be > > approved > > > by > > > >> vote. Is this correct? > > > > > > > > No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a > release. > > > The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. > > > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --000e0cd6a84099682f04a4be7fdc-- From general-return-3602-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:08:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3991940E7 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84055 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:08:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84010 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84002 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:08:51 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:08:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO gkoo.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:08:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:08:49 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <418585F1-50C4-4BCE-93C3-AB4F12FF10A5@apache.org> References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I propose just to make them blockers before committing to attract = attention > of the release manager and get his approval. The traditional response has almost always been that they get changed to = non-blockers before release. One person's blocker is another person's = issue to ignore.= From general-return-3603-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:38:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B093B43C8 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38649 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38510 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38501 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:38:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:38:29 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2064785bwz.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.31.231 with SMTP id z39mr971212bkc.134.1307039487195; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:31:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:31:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7949a577b8404a4bed8fc --001485f7949a577b8404a4bed8fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I propose just to make them blockers before committing to attract attention > of the release manager and get his approval. Imho, even small changes, like > HDFS-1954 are blockers, because a vague UI message is bug and bugs are > blockers. > Bugs are blockers? Then we'll never release! Let's hear from Nigel what he thinks. It's his branch, if he's upset about the way it's being handled, he can deal with it as he sees fit. -Todd > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > > > > > I can see them well. > > > I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. > > > Nigel, do you have full control over it? > > > > > > > Of course it's up to Nigel to decide, but here's my personal opinion: > > > > One of the reasons we had a lot of divergence (read: external > > branches/forks/whatever) off of 0.20 is that the commit rules on the > branch > > were held pretty strictly. So, if you wanted a non-critical bug fix or a > > small improvement, the only option was to do such things on an external > > fork. 0.20 was branched in December '08 and not released until mid April > > '09. In 4 months a fair number of bug fixes and small improvements go in. > > 0.22 has been around even longer. If we were to keep it to *only* > blockers, > > then again it would be a fairly useless release due to the number of > > non-blocker bugs. > > > > Clearly there's a balance and a judgment call when moving things back to > a > > branch. But at this point I'd consider small improvements and pretty much > > any bug fix to be reasonable, so long as it doesn't involve major > reworking > > of components. Nigel: if this assumption doesn't jive (ha ha, get it?) > with > > what you're thinking, please let me know :) > > > > -Todd > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler < > > eric14@yahoo-inc.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these > decisions > > > > visible so folks can understand what is happening. > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 > > from > > > > trunk. > > > > >> From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be > > > approved > > > > by > > > > >> vote. Is this correct? > > > > > > > > > > No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a > > release. > > > > The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. > > > > > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485f7949a577b8404a4bed8fc-- From general-return-3604-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 02:04:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D58A6C4E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 02:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41170 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 02:04:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41113 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 02:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41105 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 02:04:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:04:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tearsend@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:04:52 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so1870469iwr.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:04:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4MwNKnUulX0PzJWRxRE2snIRvbHqXbeMlfntv8D8SZA=; b=vcVrHDoK3oxS1Ndgh6bo6aOzX/PIFGpcSzlW7Ycbo/Q9BS67TPdiy2LsMRvB+6R1PN b5JeQmXioK7fPhvv9mc1kIJDepTMOv3plc+NIqrNAodgaVfpodnHCTAw8HFBqMRWXYHl b85FOTShSf9r07PDb9xZdv2sKqXOjxZRwXBsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jBK8x7Z8n9HIQxcl65F7ZmqNlLq/mgY5xvkPURuNCJ4Z8H2/bsjLIfILz7rEueSODp H+uoPHSPohBaIXmzlszJPD5ArRJ9KxswDuwy8BeoN2qPRv4KPn8QsipfDXYklp96N6n9 YhN7o5hLDnacRPpDhRmOVYyuByt6mLa7G80OY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.197 with SMTP id c5mr1766367ibl.131.1307066671843; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.148.3 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:04:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:04:31 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer From: Kum seong Moon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf13deac4ac804a4c52cd2 --000e0cdf13deac4ac804a4c52cd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congratulations, Mr.Myers! When, how can I be a person like you? Cheers, Jamie Moon 2011/6/3 Harsh J > Congratulations Aaron! > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has > > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS > > projects. We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project > > so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. Welcome > > aboard atm! > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > --000e0cdf13deac4ac804a4c52cd2-- From general-return-3605-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 04:58:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24F716D2F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 04:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69228 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 04:58:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69179 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 04:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69171 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 04:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:58:36 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2660273bwz.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.79.196 with SMTP id q4mr1478578bkk.107.1307077095138; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:58:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:57:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:57:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Spam on wiki To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd9788f3259904a4c79955 --0016e6dd9788f3259904a4c79955 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FYI, I've filed the following ticket with ASF Infrastructure to see if we can get a CAPTCHA set up on our wiki: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3670 In the meantime, we've been doing a decent job of policing, let's keep it up -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6dd9788f3259904a4c79955-- From general-return-3606-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 05:19:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFA076851 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 05:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90704 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 05:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90641 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 05:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90633 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 05:19:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:19:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:19:31 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2673456bwz.35 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.187.129 with SMTP id cw1mr1512283bkb.80.1307078350185; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:19:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:18:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:18:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3024505fc1a34004a4c7e406 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3024505fc1a34004a4c7e406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To Aaron: congrats! To Jamie, and anyone else wondering how to become a committer, there are some brief guidelines to how many people in the Apache community see the role: http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html In the end, though, it is a vote by the project's management committee (PMC) where each member can vote based on the criteria they think will best benefit the project. I won't speak for other PMC members, but my top criteria are: - Do they have good technical skills in general, and also demonstrate good understanding of some part of our specific codebase? (in other words, can they effectively review and commit new contributor's work without introducing bad code or bugs) - Do they know their limitations? (eg knowing when it's better to let another committer review a patch because they don't know the possible ramifications of the change well enough) - Are they a team player who can compromise even if it means some extra work for them? (eg adding additional unit tests when asked, changing a design based on some feedback even if they have to throw away some code, etc) So, if you or anyone else would like to become a committer, the best way is to start by showing the qualities above. Here are some concrete steps you might take as a new contributor: - subscribe to the "dev" mailing lists and watch for broken Hudson builds. If you see a test start newly failing, try to investigate which commit broke it and do your best to debug what might have caused it. - subscribe to the "user" mailing list and answer other users' questions (this helps demonstrate that you want to help others and that you know the product/code well) - find a bug and submit a patch to fix it. Here's a link to a bunch of tickets that have been deemed easy enough for new contributors: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+in+(%22HADOOP%22,+%22MAPREDUCE%22,+%22HDFS%22)+and+labels+%3D+%22newbie%22+and+status+%3D+open If you or anyone else would like any more advice about how best to contribute, feel free to reach out to me or the dev lists (specific questions are best!) Thanks -Todd On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Kum seong Moon wrote: > Congratulations, Mr.Myers! > > When, how can I be a person like you? > > Cheers, > Jamie Moon > > 2011/6/3 Harsh J > > > Congratulations Aaron! > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has > > > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS > > > projects. We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project > > > so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. Welcome > > > aboard atm! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eli > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Harsh J > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --20cf3024505fc1a34004a4c7e406-- From general-return-3607-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:21:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58ADF64A8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27484 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:21:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27412 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27404 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:21:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:21:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.232] (HELO nm13-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:21:41 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2011 11:21:20 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.177] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2011 11:21:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2011 11:21:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 221587.32032.bm@omp1060.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 84819 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2011 11:21:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307100080; bh=iB8cu/y9rds4U1rYe2XLAaYEmkslAAAngc0sdQVqez4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=As+MJChixVUpYs1yH32eaJsNBA4PduxcNwkJ5pV/0gLyz6iBnCNgnB1bhw3m6uEKa1cxmilFMMa0qFx+IyYMk1hJiAguzURFgtqvubTEF2AAnOlBVUa98ze1aAgG1dL+S3ZkZOMFJjJf3TqXb5iphcE0o2NUTU6VysoLttXGPTw= Message-ID: <897227.67593.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mMZbNxkVM1m6rvO0jUYyJPMQnAJn0iXMd5BXvhgauoJ36RX _Ur.5X77AU8EOqv2hkVJWuOGDY5Vk5DybSRi7UHnirZnezBM6jvo4D0ys1nu 2z1YFXWIqSRztB6vKggRA6_wpOZJMaI5cLHQA0E.7bguxeOt7OsiFOCINQrr M8NcGDKPTa0jWeeMOKF.6WZykSMHkEi4r2NPq6_ZRha7s4aYyW.TbvqqjrUt gBIrjuxeex5KgMKMQH8_b0yHSWqcEtlXKvr5OIaibGPDx7Qxwyw5slv37OUd RhpquzYEL8FotZ49Yel2LHiwA.8dN.skOgTkQ8398uSqUq1tGAJKii9VQUHI hnt0zJ39aTj2NnrxHPPnYB3CFWg6uetch5WTqLwhsyQCvxzSLBig3NuSEb3V qteC3LCd07FkK4A-- Received: from [213.61.227.42] by web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:21:19 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations Aaron.=0A=0AIt's great to see new committers on HDFS, and knowing a bit about what you guys are up to, this is exciting.=0A=0A - Andy= =0A=0A> From: Eli Collins =0A> Subject: Please join me in= welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer=0A> To: genera= l@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011, 10:12 AM=0A> On behal= f of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has=0A> been electe= d a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS=0A> projects.=A0 We appr= eciate all the work Aaron has put into the project=0A> so far, and are look= ing forward to his future contributions.=A0 Welcome=0A> aboard atm!=0A> =0A= > Thanks,=0A> Eli=0A From general-return-3608-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 12:46:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D2AF6EDC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74202 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 12:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74149 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 12:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74140 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 12:46:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:46:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:46:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 26708 invoked by uid 507); 3 Jun 2011 12:46:20 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.637393 secs); 03 Jun 2011 12:46:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2011 12:46:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E76132461C; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:46:19 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J09YaFjC7TLg; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:46:18 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50C813243A7; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:46:18 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DE8D7F9.3020501@uci.cu> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:47:53 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Andrew Purtell Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer References: <897227.67593.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <897227.67593.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit El 6/3/2011 7:21 AM, Andrew Purtell escribió: > Congratulations Aaron. > > It's great to see new committers on HDFS, and knowing a bit about what you guys are up to, this is exciting. > > - Andy > > >> From: Eli Collins >> Subject: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011, 10:12 AM >> On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has >> been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS >> projects. We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project >> so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. Welcome >> aboard atm! >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> > Congratulations, Aaron, good for you. Regards -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com From general-return-3609-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 13:07:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10590657E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5876 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 13:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5819 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 13:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5801 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 13:07:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:07:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:07:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 4346 invoked by uid 507); 3 Jun 2011 13:06:49 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.646783 secs); 03 Jun 2011 13:06:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2011 13:06:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A474132461C; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:06:49 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kMkhjpiPoKMV; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:06:48 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC8113243A7; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:06:48 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DE8DCD0.3090605@uci.cu> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:08:32 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Todd Lipcon Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Aaron Myers as the newest Apache Hadoop committer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit El 6/3/2011 1:18 AM, Todd Lipcon escribió: > To Aaron: congrats! > > To Jamie, and anyone else wondering how to become a committer, there are > some brief guidelines to how many people in the Apache community see the > role: > http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html > > In the end, though, it is a vote by the project's management committee (PMC) > where each member can vote based on the criteria they think will best > benefit the project. > > I won't speak for other PMC members, but my top criteria are: > - Do they have good technical skills in general, and also demonstrate good > understanding of some part of our specific codebase? (in other words, can > they effectively review and commit new contributor's work without > introducing bad code or bugs) > - Do they know their limitations? (eg knowing when it's better to let > another committer review a patch because they don't know the possible > ramifications of the change well enough) > - Are they a team player who can compromise even if it means some extra work > for them? (eg adding additional unit tests when asked, changing a design > based on some feedback even if they have to throw away some code, etc) > > So, if you or anyone else would like to become a committer, the best way is > to start by showing the qualities above. Here are some concrete steps you > might take as a new contributor: > - subscribe to the "dev" mailing lists and watch for broken Hudson builds. > If you see a test start newly failing, try to investigate which commit broke > it and do your best to debug what might have caused it. > - subscribe to the "user" mailing list and answer other users' questions > (this helps demonstrate that you want to help others and that you know the > product/code well) > - find a bug and submit a patch to fix it. Here's a link to a bunch of > tickets that have been deemed easy enough for new contributors: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+in+(%22HADOOP%22,+%22MAPREDUCE%22,+%22HDFS%22)+and+labels+%3D+%22newbie%22+and+status+%3D+open > > If you or anyone else would like any more advice about how best to > contribute, feel free to reach out to me or the dev lists (specific > questions are best!) > > Thanks > -Todd > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Kum seong Moon wrote: > > >> Congratulations, Mr.Myers! >> >> When, how can I be a person like you? >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie Moon >> >> 2011/6/3 Harsh J >> >> >>> Congratulations Aaron! >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> >>>> On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Aaron Myers has >>>> been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop Common and HDFS >>>> projects. We appreciate all the work Aaron has put into the project >>>> so far, and are looking forward to his future contributions. Welcome >>>> aboard atm! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eli >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Harsh J >>> >>> >> > > > Good points, Todd. -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Distributed Systems) Universidad de las Ciencias Informaticas La Habana, Cuba http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3610-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 10:01:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92E96674F for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36875 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 10:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36730 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 10:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36722 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 10:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:01:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212081BA0A4 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:00:45 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ea453i7yhZPu for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:00:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCBF1BA6AD for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:00:40 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1307872829.48937@omzdN2Scki71S7Avu/IGzw Received: from [16.24.224.148] ([16.24.224.148]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p55A0SP0018370 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:00:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DEB53B7.6070301@apache.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:00:23 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Spam on wiki References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p55A0SP0018370 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/06/2011 05:57, Todd Lipcon wrote: > FYI, I've filed the following ticket with ASF Infrastructure to see if we > can get a CAPTCHA set up on our wiki: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3670 > > In the meantime, we've been doing a decent job of policing, let's keep it up > > -Todd There's some way of setting up patterns to block. I think it's just adding the relevant regexp to http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/BadContent is that right? From general-return-3611-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 16:45:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 980B74F2F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62117 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:45:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62035 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61864 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 16:45:22 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:45:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:45:21 +0000 From: Allen Wittenauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: LimitedPrivate and HBase Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:45:21 -0700 Message-Id: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate = being opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public = APIs rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, = wouldn't other clients as well? From general-return-3612-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 17:01:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DBB34890 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13189 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:01:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13133 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:01:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13125 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 17:01:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:01:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:01:27 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6087477bwz.35 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.145.18 with SMTP id b18mr5229225bkv.26.1307379667508; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:01:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517476246ab1e2b04a50e0c13 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517476246ab1e2b04a50e0c13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate being > opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public APIs > rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, wouldn't > other clients as well? > IMO LimitedPrivate can be used to open an API for a specific project when it's not clear that the API is generally useful, and/or we anticipate the API might be pretty unstable. Marking it LimitedPrivate to HBase gives us the opportunity to talk to the HBase team and say "hey, we want to rename this without @Deprecation" or "hey, we're going to kill this, is that OK?" Making it true public, even if we call it Unstable, is a bit harder to move. I agree that most of these things in the long run would be determined generally useful and made public. Do you have a specific thing in mind? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001517476246ab1e2b04a50e0c13-- From general-return-3613-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 17:36:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B31F449C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96265 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96217 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96209 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:36:49 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1C10ECAD-DBDC-4ED7-BF45-4B922F72306A@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate = being >> opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public = APIs >> rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, = wouldn't >> other clients as well? >>=20 >=20 > IMO LimitedPrivate can be used to open an API for a specific project = when > it's not clear that the API is generally useful, and/or we anticipate = the > API might be pretty unstable. Marking it LimitedPrivate to HBase gives = us > the opportunity to talk to the HBase team and say "hey, we want to = rename > this without @Deprecation" or "hey, we're going to kill this, is that = OK?" > Making it true public, even if we call it Unstable, is a bit harder to = move. True, but what makes HBase a unique snowflake? What is the = criteria by which an API gets opened to something outside of the Hadoop = umbrella? Why shouldn't something be private to Hadoop just because = HBase or someone else wants to use it? =20 > I agree that most of these things in the long run would be determined > generally useful and made public. >=20 > Do you have a specific thing in mind? Not really. I just wanted to take a temperature to see what = other people are thinking and whether we actually have any guidelines. = Doing this wild west style seems fraught with danger. ("You opened this = up for them, why can't you up this up for us?") (Although I must admit that the first usage of this--the = HttpServer code--sort of left with a "Seriously? You must be kidding." = kind of feeling about it.)= From general-return-3614-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 18:35:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4DD74F85 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4273 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 18:35:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4223 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 18:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4215 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 18:35:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:35:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:35:08 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so2605168qyk.14 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:34:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L0N8kLlYZ2UssbW9/snzRm9euy33M67WIs/QgB6fn8s=; b=OVc82242HHIjVNvot3WhHygOtCMpW12TcKJ/8u9zpNpnYPUcOYAY43Mim7gXAMAZ8s 9otEBLksc5nBqZftY70nLZLGWr1jiEBSkC/GC2WV7n01QxlgGhXIGavIf/gvrd6tqiZG /QqFL6d0fB15qVJTGjktw8ki2pv75WsFjikzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cLVncWrwu/rPp4U+zQRh3xelzYYNouqyHPe0KKAR7ADmhogv7Fj5LodWuQyji9H+FK ksrng5q5rJu4ZV6rUYJCsLemrf2YFSxq+bo0zZQ7lKqfHSGb9KWN3cuY3/a/BqIE+2Mr jDzp7rhGs4cUG9VF9+H35tDpM0W/ynPOcpZ24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.192.69 with SMTP id dp5mr2262646qab.267.1307385287611; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.6.146 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:34:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:34:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YFdwPuOD5PbtU7-oHgYp5fX2sso Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPriva= te being opened up to HBase. =A0Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to publi= c APIs rather than poking through some holes? =A0If HBase needs an API, wou= ldn't other clients as well? > HBase uses public APIs. A method we relied on went from protected to private. Fixing this brought on the flagging of HttpServer with LimitedPrivate (HttpServer, the class flagged, is mostly internal to Hadoop but HBase, because, in part, of its subproject provenance, extends HttpServer providing its UI reusing Hadoop's log level, thread dumping, etc., servlets) The LimitedPrivate aid as I see it is to give folks pause the next time they mess with access/signatures or, if change is necessary, they'll know who to give the head-up to that change is coming -- should they choose to do so. St.Ack From general-return-3615-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:45:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58CB3447A for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24294 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:45:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24243 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:45:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24235 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:45:24 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:45:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:45:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:45:21 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <08E3D059-20B7-49F4-AA53-C1012C9480A1@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Stack wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate = being opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public = APIs rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, = wouldn't other clients as well? >>=20 >=20 > HBase uses public APIs. A method we relied on went from protected to > private. Fixing this brought on the flagging of HttpServer with > LimitedPrivate (HttpServer, the class flagged, is mostly internal to > Hadoop but HBase, because, in part, of its subproject provenance, > extends HttpServer providing its UI reusing Hadoop's log level, thread > dumping, etc., servlets) So, no, HBase does not actually use public APIs.... From general-return-3616-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 23:22:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0AF94B4C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30640 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:22:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30581 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30571 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 23:22:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:22:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.220] (HELO nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:22:41 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.189] by nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 23:22:20 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.186] by tm2.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 23:22:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jun 2011 23:22:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 836124.38278.bm@omp1069.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 9172 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jun 2011 23:22:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307402540; bh=v5340qFXkxivifsRX6Bq/dM5Lb4wKKPDpX6n5+SvJAI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oFYAPuzE0SSd5BNgOiI3Zwu89EpW90nxVgybBXqqvGeOKSyqTOMxxuqn4kkrvgYsxlQL33+Ep5bRj0WaiNEsF7c4ZhLgloE8UqrfiOpJChOMdq/D6SNy2ZO6fcwVAjBgE3zbmPuRjM+25/CBannow5vErNteHT7PpjyLd3G2ZQg= Message-ID: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KvyWBfQVM1n4ZTUgMQvcPRMMDj1Cg4YDCLzifmsea6IAPjr oFEl6KTE2Mus0JmUvQhGafpIOOAPxkc7YzHQNc0K8SdC.gctPD5c77Sx5hSC i50lLq5ZMUpib_SivohibWd3NAZnuI41GK6BY4_ZPv3RMjIYNc5Z_3DQuGLy qyCrO6AVcaTtDvXx28x6r7nrweLGH2Xzl6utlBlGLVEjP01gP3dIdcwkOuGR ASDWxSATM7QTdT.rwuwAGrI_kfxcsK9742TrDkY_HLvHVnilWynLHePZl_PG 5xDGi9v6wd0_POXdJra56p_.9DgKfLmmM4gxE3g.RXbxUUaF8Wy4JHNiB9cv KoXgeoJtM2D9nFYOPeI59XBlrP.AlQ4c3ul.0GzB4BF_JUS.bRPEmI0MJd7R 4.l07m3R_Ifi4Tg-- Received: from [213.61.227.39] by web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:22:19 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <08E3D059-20B7-49F4-AA53-C1012C9480A1@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 6/6/11, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > So, no, HBase does not actually use public APIs.... We could instead cut and paste the code in question here from Hadoop and modify it for our purposes. (This was done for RPC, earlier.) However other Hadoop-ish daemons may well want to extend HttpServer in this same way so the servlets for thread dumps and adjusting logging levels can be reused rather than cloned or reimplemented (or dropped). How HttpServer as implemented configures the container requires one to reach in a bit to set these up plus our own webapps. Perhaps opening a jira for a cleaner framework for HttpServer extension could be useful? Best regards, - Andy From general-return-3617-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 23:34:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B62C41DB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42597 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:34:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42542 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 23:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42534 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 23:34:12 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:34:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:34:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:34:10 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >=20 > Perhaps opening a jira for a cleaner framework for HttpServer = extension could be useful? Sure. That's probably what should have happened to begin with = rather than the quickly changing the API to a different classification. = I was a bit surprised that the JIRA went through so quickly without much = comment, but I assumed that's because it was HBase requesting or because = so many people were on their way to Berlin. That said, big picture issue: I still think there should be some = official guidance on when LimitedPrivate is the right thing to do. I'd = hate to see random groups requesting an API change "just this once" with = no real leg to stand on whether it was appropriate or not.= From general-return-3618-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 00:57:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6681B4F57 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18558 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 00:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18489 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 00:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18481 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 00:57:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:57:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6649453bwz.35 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.41.206 with SMTP id p14mr5267178bke.53.1307408206173; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:56:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:56:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:56:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec555517ab4972504a514b1f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec555517ab4972504a514b1f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > > Perhaps opening a jira for a cleaner framework for HttpServer extension > could be useful? > > Sure. That's probably what should have happened to begin with > rather than the quickly changing the API to a different classification. I > was a bit surprised that the JIRA went through so quickly without much > comment, but I assumed that's because it was HBase requesting or because so > many people were on their way to Berlin. > Or because this is the sort of thing that could take weeks of discussion or just 5 minutes to unblock HBase from moving on to trunk. I'd rather have the weeks of discussion *after* the 5 minute patch, so people can continue to make progress. We've moved too slowly for too long. > > That said, big picture issue: I still think there should be some > official guidance on when LimitedPrivate is the right thing to do. I'd hate > to see random groups requesting an API change "just this once" with no real > leg to stand on whether it was appropriate or not. -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec555517ab4972504a514b1f0-- From general-return-3619-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:05:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2045646AA for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23600 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23465 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23457 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:05:17 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:05:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:05:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:05:15 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Or because this is the sort of thing that could take weeks of = discussion or > just 5 minutes to unblock HBase from moving on to trunk. I'd rather = have the > weeks of discussion *after* the 5 minute patch, so people can continue = to > make progress. We've moved too slowly for too long. I didn't realize trunk was coming out as a release next month. Let's face it: this happened because it was HBase. If it was = almost anyone else, it would have sat there.... and *that's* the point = where I'm mainly concerned.= From general-return-3620-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:09:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B173F46F6 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28543 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28486 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28476 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:09:01 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6659397bwz.35 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.145.18 with SMTP id b18mr341807bkv.26.1307408920229; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:08:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:08:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:08:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174762464436aa04a514dca6 --0015174762464436aa04a514dca6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Or because this is the sort of thing that could take weeks of discussion > or > > just 5 minutes to unblock HBase from moving on to trunk. I'd rather have > the > > weeks of discussion *after* the 5 minute patch, so people can continue to > > make progress. We've moved too slowly for too long. > > > I didn't realize trunk was coming out as a release next month. > If all goes well, 0.22 will come out as a release some time in that timeframe. Stack has been getting HBase running on it. This patch was to fix 0.22. > > Let's face it: this happened because it was HBase. If it was almost > anyone else, it would have sat there.... and *that's* the point where I'm > mainly concerned. If you want to feel better, take a look at HDFS-941, HDFS-347, and HDFS-918 - these are patches that HBase has been asking for for nearly 2 years in some cases and haven't gone in. Satisfied? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0015174762464436aa04a514dca6-- From general-return-3621-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:18:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C73A4310 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35934 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35880 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:18:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35872 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:18:07 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:18:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:18:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:18:06 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> Let's face it: this happened because it was HBase. If it was = almost >> anyone else, it would have sat there.... and *that's* the point where = I'm >> mainly concerned. >=20 >=20 > If you want to feel better, take a look at HDFS-941, HDFS-347, and = HDFS-918 > - these are patches that HBase has been asking for for nearly 2 years = in > some cases and haven't gone in. Satisfied? These cases don't appear to be about re-classification of an API = from private to semi-public. So no, I'm not. None of these appear to = answer the base set of question: - What is the real criteria for changing an API from private to = limited? - How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this = privilege? (Yes, I've read the classification docs. That's too vague.) I can tell you feel I'm picking on HBase, especially in light of = my flat out rejection of the "we want to mmap() blocks" case. But if = this reclassification had been with anything else outside of the Hadoop = project, I would have asked the same thing. It raises important = questions that we as a project need to answer.= From general-return-3622-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:25:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70DA34F17 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45540 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:25:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45488 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:25:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45480 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:25:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:25:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:25:37 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6673452bwz.35 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.41.206 with SMTP id p14mr5286622bke.53.1307409916155; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:25:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:23:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:23:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec555517aa0d6d204a51517cd --bcaec555517aa0d6d204a51517cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > These cases don't appear to be about re-classification of an API > from private to semi-public. So no, I'm not. None of these appear to > answer the base set of question: > > In the specific case of HttpServer, this API *used* to be semi-public, then it was made private as a side effect of another change. (I should know, I'm the one who made the change that accidentally privatized it... it wasn't for any thought-out reason) > - What is the real criteria for changing an API from private to > limited? > - How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this > privilege? > > (Yes, I've read the classification docs. That's too vague.) > > I can tell you feel I'm picking on HBase, especially in light of my > flat out rejection of the "we want to mmap() blocks" case. But if this > reclassification had been with anything else outside of the Hadoop project, > I would have asked the same thing. It raises important questions that we as > a project need to answer. Nah, I just think these "meta discussions" waste an awful lot of time that's better spent making real progress on the code, or reviewing the complex changes where extra eyes really make a big difference. http://www.bikeshed.com/ -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec555517aa0d6d204a51517cd-- From general-return-3623-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:33:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B395408D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55055 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54997 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54989 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:33:12 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:33:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:33:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:33:10 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A170F27-BA48-474A-905B-1F5B38D5F4FF@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 6, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >=20 > Nah, I just think these "meta discussions" waste an awful lot of time = that's > better spent making real progress on the code, or reviewing the = complex > changes where extra eyes really make a big difference. OK. That's make it easier to just -1 changes like this with = reasoning such as "HBase is not a related project." Then we can go back = working on core Hadoop. From general-return-3624-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 01:50:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FF8A4F7E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71691 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:50:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71623 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 01:50:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71615 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 01:50:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:50:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:50:49 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so5480632vws.35 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=NxmEbPKX4rxNpc3ml+KPv3WNeJZfz8VUJMkOwLs6irE=; b=GSXLWpRU329N9Ias3mfxjE/deTLgeAFEEi/qQx2RnhUSyY01vFquvrBE0bi2F2zxY6 Fl19+638fQyAG5pEIjYKc8o0qE8pU4cNajtWj2TqNBeGbaU314snCuc0eee4sj9UTVxj LagpfiYeRwE9KdalCLucUy0ghRGmAfZHCSDeE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=i3aRrTyFvDkzuboohAd9tHIWsn2DTUu1KPIe2Zq+n/A38+hgl4g7a/nnG3KSTe9KOS XAy4knlRFZ7iyyZDGw4NYbOkZzHcOTxVQV7l497zn2Xc+ZX3cw21dTijsUoxwjMYTMnk rXvU0RMIW7VqcoRlh37bJBUj9kfvbUcdzD0oc= Received: by 10.52.97.197 with SMTP id ec5mr4431204vdb.259.1307411428488; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.200] (static-76-160-17-94.dsl.cavtel.net [76.160.17.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b9sm796783vdk.13.2011.06.06.18.50.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:50:26 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <17CBDF8F-CDE2-4D8D-AC5D-EB222CF24BD1@Holsman.NET> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> <742D84CF-B599-463A-A6E0-2B5732FD27B6@apache.org> <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > But if this reclassification had been with anything else = outside of the Hadoop project, I would have asked the same thing. It = raises important questions that we as a project need to answer. "Life's not fair".:-) (couldn't resist.. sorry) But in all seriousness, the project should treat every request on it's = own merits, regardless of which project/person requests it. In actuality if you've been working closely with another project or know = the person who is asking for it, you'll naturally put more weight on the = request, as you have more trust that that person knows what they are = doing, and aren't being lazy/poorly informed about requesting it. I was wondering if there are other examples of interfaces you (or = others) think should un-deprecated/made public.=20= From general-return-3625-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 09:10:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 725AC6893 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45247 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 09:10:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45054 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 09:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45046 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 09:10:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:10:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:10:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8B5B7D49 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:09:41 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4WlnaIa+ravN for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:09:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7220BB7D44 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:09:40 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308042566.36247@xS+uW9JIAF7ENmWpvD31ag Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5799O0k020122 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:09:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DEDEAC4.8000408@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:09:24 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5799O0k020122 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 06/06/2011 05:45 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate being opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public APIs rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, wouldn't other clients as well? > > Hey, isn't HBase part of the official Hadoop stack? From general-return-3626-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 10:11:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD6E96A2A for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51559 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51505 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51497 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 10:11:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:11:22 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so5797577vws.35 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 03:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.177.233 with SMTP id ct9mr1165362vdc.112.1307441461068; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 03:11:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.110.134 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 03:10:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [79.194.77.34] In-Reply-To: <4DEDEAC4.8000408@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> <4DEDEAC4.8000408@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 03:10:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307abde9da048104a51c6fde --20cf307abde9da048104a51c6fde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Not really. It isn't part of any Hadoop release. And no official Hadoop release will run hbase reliably. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 06/06/2011 05:45 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> >> >> I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPrivate being >> opened up to HBase. Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to public APIs >> rather than poking through some holes? If HBase needs an API, wouldn't >> other clients as well? >> >> >> > Hey, isn't HBase part of the official Hadoop stack? > --20cf307abde9da048104a51c6fde-- From general-return-3627-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 12:25:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4B8C60A3 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47562 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 12:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47460 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 12:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47381 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 12:25:08 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:25:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.0.0.77]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username gsingers, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:25:07 +0000 From: Grant Ingersoll Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-17-577307994 Subject: [OT] 11 Days to Scale-A-Thon Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:25:05 -0400 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@mahout.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-17-577307994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Just a friendly reminder to everyone of the upcoming Scale-A-Thon event = at Bronto Software. We've got a great day planned of hands on = programming with Apache Hadoop and other related tools like Apache = HBase, Mahout, Hive, etc. The event is June 18th at Bronto Software in = Durham, NC. =20 Thanks in no small part to the generosity of several sponsors, the = event, including lunch, dinner, drinks and compute time on Amazon EC2 = will be completely free. Our sponsors so far are Bronto Software, Booz = Allen Hamilton, iContact, Open Source Integrators and Cloudera. If you = want to find out more, check out http://www.scaleathon.com or register = at http://scaleathon-rtp.eventbrite.com/ Cheers, Grant= --Apple-Mail-17-577307994-- From general-return-3628-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 13:52:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CBB34F87 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32980 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 13:52:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32890 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 13:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32878 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 13:52:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:52:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.48] (HELO smtp2.4emm.com) (69.18.222.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:51:55 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB02.4emm.local ([192.168.161.133]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:51:33 -0400 From: Doug Meil To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:53:05 -0400 Subject: RE: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Index: Acwl4Iw6RCuOjurXTV64oHfuXGbYYQ== Message-ID: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5952823BED1E9@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi there- The following are some thoughts on questions raised in this thread that are= more on the Hadoop-core development process than this particular issue. D= isclosure: I'm active on the HBase dist-list, so Hadoop-core folks can tak= e my comments with a pinch or two of salt if required.=20 Re: "What is the real criteria for changing an API from private to limited= ?" I don't know, but from the perspective of an observer my request to Hadoop-= core developers is to not to over-think this.=20 Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this privilege?= " / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to something outside= of the Hadoop umbrella" Given the context of the original question, is this debate really necessary= ? Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out of Hadoop (= e.g, there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) It's not like= somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature requests. Re: "If it was almost anyone else, it would have sat there.... and *that's= * the point where I'm mainly concerned." Hadoop-core development has been slow/stalled over the past 2 years, but re= cent events such as Yahoo now backing the Apache distro are great signs tha= t velocity will pick up and push forward. Forward progress, even with item= s as small as this, is good. =20 Re: "Then we can go back working on core Hadoop." Hadoop-core is critical to many frameworks in the Hadoop family (Hive, Pig,= and yes, HBase), but software frameworks are only good when utilized and s= erving the needs of those who use them. My request to Hadoop-core develope= rs is to not assume that Core exists as an end to itself. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto:aw@apache.org]=20 Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 9:33 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase On Jun 6, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >=20 > Nah, I just think these "meta discussions" waste an awful lot of time=20 > that's better spent making real progress on the code, or reviewing the=20 > complex changes where extra eyes really make a big difference. OK. That's make it easier to just -1 changes like this with reasoning suc= h as "HBase is not a related project." Then we can go back working on core = Hadoop. From general-return-3629-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:14:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8AF74D1F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88001 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:14:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87931 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87923 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:14:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:14:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.216] (HELO nm21-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:13:56 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.194] by nm21.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:13:35 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.182] by tm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:13:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1065.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:13:35 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 422563.37668.bm@omp1065.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 26281 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jun 2011 16:13:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307549615; bh=NE1jwwWVw1pz7M0OHp+DI9CAETClFUoVu3LQfHegSB8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vlOuYPYFkB+RqM3BtqMF/itiFkVLFnQiNBBoBG7UhtEXZxoKvFZmv217Y6UwRHXyCsq93x9QVmxDampuPHvfFejbPIGXSWalfh8GU1LPykfzg+LjUVMxsIw34zyI4TxpYYWg8C8F7WSYfb5GKRhlsFDlniNj7rASNACwKS2GDOw= Message-ID: <206764.24240.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CNJRXRsVM1lEPdcZp9GbDAfxhUo4pRTqEpRcYOfCU3YzAwD A5OBmps2.9FB_3ROEp5t9vltuQNLMP2BbEe7fDRneT2ImEFShQQH1M7WUAVV WYSZV5iHoC36IOpyegfKBG_u2zsuTmaov9s7QJf9p3CS8fPKVBTCrY9HV5v3 sLsnYD0J8zLT1LxDF7CkP6zHPzwhuz5dLlTcXwGkgQisrVgQexuNCM7dIreb LGCQ6eBnCK2i4zdBJOBCpYro.dg3JSp8pFtY.GikzI7MfJrnoLp7TFOGStSe mn3.Wqci3HAjbW_JZ0blc.6XtuRu2U1CCbk3hm8J2FLL9aL9.s2.en8IBEoe AEOMgJXUmdrFUkAtHTZsiD7RorGaddlPmVlO0U1vOKHijHhJje8LuSYVe1uW zhFcYwztry6Iq_Q-- Received: from [213.61.227.39] by web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:13:34 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:13:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <361B71C9-1216-4EBF-98DA-732AEB0C21E8@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I can tell you feel I'm picking on HBase, especially in light of my=0A> f= lat out rejection of the "we want to mmap() blocks" case.=0A=0AI for one un= derstand the objection there.=0A=0AAlthough it does negatively impact the w= ork of a recent promising new contributor. As a project, HBase suffers for = it. Of course that is no concern of HDFS. =0A=0AOn the other hand I do beli= eve Todd has a point. MapReduce is perhaps the only constituency that HDFS = really cares about. Any reasonable person would come to that conclusion aft= er surveying submitted JIRAs and their resolution times (or not). Historica= lly with HDFS the local itch, the concern of the big MapReduce shops, gets = the scratch and others are of not much concern. Therefore there is unfortun= ate business that lingers today -- Facebook, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, and = others have effectively forked HDFS (0.20) in house for use with HBase, and= nobody I know is seriously considering using HDFS 0.22 or TRUNK due to a l= ack of evidence that anyone with a stake in it is running it in production = at scale. Past discussion to mend the breach with an HBase-friendly release= of HDFS 0.20 ended with what I would describe as an inflexible and legalis= tic air. =0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0AProblems worthy of attack= prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A=0A=0A---= On Mon, 6/6/11, Allen Wittenauer wrote:=0A=0A> From: Allen= Wittenauer =0A> Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase=0A> T= o: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Monday, June 6, 2011, 6:18 PM=0A> = =0A> On Jun 6, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:=0A> > =0A> >> =0A> >>= =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0Let's face it: this=0A> happened because it was HBase.=A0 = If it was almost=0A> >> anyone else, it would have sat there.... and=0A> *t= hat's* the point where I'm=0A> >> mainly concerned.=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > If = you want to feel better, take a look at HDFS-941,=0A> HDFS-347, and HDFS-91= 8=0A> > - these are patches that HBase has been asking for for=0A> nearly 2= years in=0A> > some cases and haven't gone in. Satisfied?=0A> =0A> =A0=A0= =A0 These cases don't appear to be about=0A> re-classification of an API fr= om private to=0A> semi-public.=A0 So no, I'm not.=A0 None of these=0A> appe= ar to answer the base set of question:=0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0 - What is the rea= l criteria for changing=0A> an API from private to limited?=0A> =A0=A0=A0 -= How "closely related" does a project=0A> need to be to get this privilege?= =0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0 (Yes, I've read the classification=0A> docs.=A0 That's = too vague.)=0A> =0A> =A0=A0=A0 I can tell you feel I'm picking on=0A> HBase= , especially in light of my flat out rejection of the=0A> "we want to mmap(= ) blocks" case.=A0 But if this=0A> reclassification had been with anything = else outside of the=0A> Hadoop project, I would have asked the same thing.= =A0 It=0A> raises important questions that we as a project need to=0A> answ= er. From general-return-3630-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:17:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F8E04912 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94654 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:17:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94596 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94588 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:17:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:17:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.210] (HELO nm18-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:17:28 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.196] by nm18.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:17:07 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.160] by tm9.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:17:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Jun 2011 16:17:07 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 958764.61337.bm@omp1043.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15251 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jun 2011 16:17:07 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307549827; bh=ShwbcuOZldccVS+Qn2fHK2qpIJ2H49CnwiHaGzwqfcA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ho5AHkpecKvoyLAcnbjj+t140rORWXY/LFRuotrQ8xvQlXocleM7LB6bc5gC1eaGsy6N0YA5J7qbN23Pk3hvFgHOsetSya+YiQVHZFoLqXSw33yb1EqvyxOOPFkY5AlLFVKghwTdXayzobrJntfZpnj+ZsMsVaWsh6Q8xZuQ73I= Message-ID: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Yg3B44IVM1nCZBvHWa1OTFXJG81ZDquQ6qhdISeF1nWIdJg Ms5yPs3jbFf76kePc2tmud8G995QLCkzGhitfiUzUnjcvx3vw25Ttp2p.vNl oUvXpgAhG.8HBjkHirgr0c6xHzldy.FyAvY2ZNKZEG4wgHK7_pZ0UV4pAAZh 2VeEamxlMRobhrQ2bv5cJjx0Lf0_afc.x5dgQP85Z75jYg2MqSGkfsLBvoyO zg31teb.8KjAmpCgM_3QLLmWZ7vcWMNGad5T2x22nSrUCkyNerQKZQt6X_TS aHugzm3ZWoyvpeoeWG.apun_536vHZNrh5eY_.oo1KRWNx2T1XT2G3XHqn9n 6wHh3I_jKcZiboIWt0q1GJZnQ9XpvAky_hxPOAdSLxf4HJUuLEQhzmPMhr3W LA2ZWQbQLmM_bVQ-- Received: from [213.61.227.39] by web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:17:07 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <8A170F27-BA48-474A-905B-1F5B38D5F4FF@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Allen Wittenauer =0A> =A0=A0=A0 OK.=A0 That's make i= t easier to just=0A> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is = not a=0A> related project." Then we can go back working on core=0A> Hadoop.= =0A=0ASeriously? =0A=0AForget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working = on it) to give HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster = with you.=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0A From general-return-3631-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:37:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 110604449 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42500 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:37:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42442 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42434 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:37:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:37:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:37:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52582B7E18 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qXZHJwMORU-B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:36:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56CB7DE0 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:36:50 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308155796.58054@sDmmwJz3646ibi7VH8TSkw Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p58GaZRH010026 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:36:35 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DEFA513.1050807@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:36:35 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase References: <206764.24240.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <206764.24240.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p58GaZRH010026 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06/08/2011 05:13 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> I can tell you feel I'm picking on HBase, especially in light of my >> flat out rejection of the "we want to mmap() blocks" case. > > I for one understand the objection there. > > Although it does negatively impact the work of a recent promising new contributor. As a project, HBase suffers for it. Of course that is no concern of HDFS. > > On the other hand I do believe Todd has a point. MapReduce is perhaps the only constituency that HDFS really cares about. Any reasonable person would come to that conclusion after surveying submitted JIRAs and their resolution times (or not). Historically with HDFS the local itch, the concern of the big MapReduce shops, gets the scratch and others are of not much concern. Therefore there is unfortunate business that lingers today -- Facebook, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, and others have effectively forked HDFS (0.20) in house for use with HBase, and nobody I know is seriously considering using HDFS 0.22 or TRUNK due to a lack of evidence that anyone with a stake in it is running it in production at scale. Past discussion to mend the breach with an HBase-friendly release of HDFS 0.20 ended with what I would describe as an inflexible and legalistic air. > well, today MR is the primary constituency, but to be a stack you do have to make the otyher layers work. MR, with Hive and Pig on top, HBase, mahout. These extra layers can form part of the regression tests for the underlying code: if a change breaks HBase or Hive, that's something to catch early, and say "this change to hadoop-common broke it". yes, it's extra hassle dealing with changes that break things, but you find the problems so end users don't have to. And Jenkins can be set up to do much of the work, you just tweak the dependencies of the downstream projects to use the svn.trunk or -SNAPSHOT version of your code, run the builds in the right order to generate the artifacts, and wait for the emails to come in. -steve From general-return-3632-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:40:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC1124693 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53712 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53659 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53651 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so916504bwz.35 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.31.231 with SMTP id z39mr724259bkc.134.1307551186159; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:39:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.75 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:39:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <8A170F27-BA48-474A-905B-1F5B38D5F4FF@apache.org> <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:39:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org, apurtell@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7949afa09c704a535fb6f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f7949afa09c704a535fb6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > From: Allen Wittenauer > > OK. That's make it easier to just > > -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a > > related project." Then we can go back working on core > > Hadoop. > > Seriously? > > Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give > HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. > Please know that Allen's opinions are not representative of the whole community, and -1s without technical basis can be overridden. I'll leave it at that to try to short circuit a potential flame war. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485f7949afa09c704a535fb6f-- From general-return-3633-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:40:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F2C546DF for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56289 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56204 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56166 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:32 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5952823BED1E9@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:40:31 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97A5F450-4DE0-4634-B1FF-0CAEBF6952E6@apache.org> References: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5952823BED1E9@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Doug Meil wrote: >=20 > Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this = privilege?" / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to = something outside of the Hadoop umbrella" >=20 > Given the context of the original question, is this debate really = necessary? Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out = of Hadoop (e.g, there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) = It's not like somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature = requests. If HBase needs an API, why wouldn't something else? Why should = something be marked LimitedPrivate to HBase instead of just making it = Public and being done with it?=20= From general-return-3634-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:45:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64F714F54 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72457 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72234 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71302 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:45:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:45:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:45:30 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so752997wyb.35 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.32 with SMTP id q32mr5065988wep.77.1307551509013; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:45:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Apache Hadoop Hackathon in LA June 22nd From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, Thanks to everyone who came out for the Apache Hadoop Hackathons in Palo Alto and San Francisco last month. There have been a lot of requests for a similar event in LA, so we're doing it! The Hadoop Hackathon in LA will take place on Wednesday June 22nd, right before the LA HUG, hosted by Shopzilla. Cloudera's Aaron Myers (Hadoop committer) and Eric Sammer (Solutions architect) will be on hand to facilitate. Whether you're a sysadmin or devops and want to help build and test Apache Hadoop or a developer looking to get their first patch into Hadoop, this is a great chance to learn how it's done. Sign up here: http://www.meetup.com/LA-HUG/events/21380931 and we'll see you there! Thanks, Eli From general-return-3635-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:42:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D804B59 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21272 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:42:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21208 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:42:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:42:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:42:05 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p58HfPdK069074 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:41:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307554885; bh=S3agYwXtrVKfOTdqgtPD808wbXNmHvrYf6LCRf4Ns7k=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=TqNmwD6rG+/mRniPrqz+gHMt7VFMCvQpSLZevG2XzjvEAmTqHCtMZdbq8ZRhUuGXm Ln9xPS14spOSBOZbWAt9xhZUDko4o3759mjzwPffxRPF/2VONlxz7oZxBipfpf8O4s SzoL7OFn9ncf/fEUD+T7BHmrDJtLlxUbghvadej4= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:41:25 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:41:23 -0700 Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Index: Acwl+uBXxu572p+PR2aE/V3+3LIDaAACGgpe Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <97A5F450-4DE0-4634-B1FF-0CAEBF6952E6@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that ar= e closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in the future. When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that we do not know of breaks! If others, outside the umbrella of these projects need an API, they could open a jira and we could address it. On 6/8/11 9:40 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >=20 > On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Doug Meil wrote: >>=20 >> Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this privile= ge?" >> / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to something outsid= e of >> the Hadoop umbrella" >>=20 >> Given the context of the original question, is this debate really necess= ary? >> Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out of Hadoop (= e.g, >> there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) It's not like >> somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature requests. >=20 > If HBase needs an API, why wouldn't something else? Why should something= be > marked LimitedPrivate to HBase instead of just making it Public and being= done > with it?=20 From general-return-3636-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:47:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C55A14316 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36918 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36866 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36849 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:47:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:47:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:47:52 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so779623fxm.35 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jTI57tHLGjP8xv1+Ea9Y6aje42xFlTu0V5MXoIposu8=; b=Rlx1f5b6cVY3FIUWhdhbvcmJVzbRmh0yXK6H1r47+D8UtMUlW2Qfk1qYXbOAdTNGG8 PuXNk+v4pSqwbOUOFHGb5PW+XR2CMFWg6bQ0ALOR2erIaZivX7zk/UTZr9Owm1+6Mv/d vlqy6LGn4rlrgjLKV+Ks9q/PkfBJZIIg32DJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=U/Ul+7l/cR1WhANa907y80iODp/GbaXRQ3PupbYDIKH8vuWPPyGyoah1BZDYKvHaBT owyTWrejuGvGexsxdyyQWr56xNqjeHtiJ5gpqlFR7bxRMPw4akT3U7PUGSG8g5ZM1DFl bpy2KdwzmBE9u+Mwzo1y6u6kf4wVRn3zH69Yc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.62.146 with SMTP id x18mr1426843fah.54.1307555251282; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.19 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <97A5F450-4DE0-4634-B1FF-0CAEBF6952E6@apache.org> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:47:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173fe6c646e4e904a536eeaf --0015173fe6c646e4e904a536eeaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I too think that LimitedPrivate is a good idea for projects that work closely with the Hadoop ecosystem (Hive, HBase, MR, etc) It allows us to experiment with an API, that if proved useful in the longer run, can graduate to be a public API in future. Some people may rightly claim that this gives unfair advantage to projects in the Hadoop ecosystem vs projects that are outside of this system, but I see no harm in that. One reason for this is that there are many developers who work on multiple of these projects, and it is easier to coordinate changes among these projects. thanks, -dhruba On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done > similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. > > Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with > LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that > are > closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. > {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in the > future. > > When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as > community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that we > do not know of breaks! > > If others, outside the umbrella of these projects need an API, they could > open a jira and we could address it. > > > On 6/8/11 9:40 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: > > > > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Doug Meil wrote: > >> > >> Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this > privilege?" > >> / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to something > outside of > >> the Hadoop umbrella" > >> > >> Given the context of the original question, is this debate really > necessary? > >> Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out of Hadoop > (e.g, > >> there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) It's not like > >> somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature requests. > > > > If HBase needs an API, why wouldn't something else? Why should something > be > > marked LimitedPrivate to HBase instead of just making it Public and being > done > > with it? > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0015173fe6c646e4e904a536eeaf-- From general-return-3637-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:52:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3DF84AA8 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57410 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:52:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57364 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:52:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57356 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:52:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:52:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:52:39 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p58HpXMY025837 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307555493; bh=42yVFyODW+S1ixaRaqDoFm5Zram9Mu/XHxxr93JRT1M=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=FA0Fdo5015WVbAqjRXGpV/+XeoOsfJ3BFAys0qGMs3i3SNk2j9YabSGb0eMdJcJx8 hUSM7YyHhJSBH7JWzKrHVnm7Sp12jPrSkhjQl3MJPcEZHMsAWl0GtPUt/pYAy7u+5E ISfoHuRQhnmzN3QKWq5UQNzVDr8Udn3+N73G7to0= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:51:32 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:51:30 -0700 Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) Thread-Index: AcwmBEoahMXSBHxuTNqSe8Li/9AJZwAAGgyc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BTW, thank you Todd and Stack for all your effort in making changes to HDFS to make it work well with HBase. These changes are very important in making HDFS better! On 6/8/11 10:47 AM, "Dhruba Borthakur" wrote: > I too think that LimitedPrivate is a good idea for projects that work > closely with the Hadoop ecosystem (Hive, HBase, MR, etc) It allows us to > experiment with an API, that if proved useful in the longer run, can > graduate to be a public API in future. >=20 > Some people may rightly claim that this gives unfair advantage to project= s > in the Hadoop ecosystem vs projects that are outside of this system, but = I > see no harm in that. One reason for this is that there are many developer= s > who work on multiple of these projects, and it is easier to coordinate > changes among these projects. >=20 > thanks, > -dhruba >=20 > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Suresh Srinivas > wrote: >=20 >> I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done >> similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. >>=20 >> Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with >> LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that >> are >> closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. >> {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in t= he >> future. >>=20 >> When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as >> community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that= we >> do not know of breaks! >>=20 >> If others, outside the umbrella of these projects need an API, they coul= d >> open a jira and we could address it. >>=20 >>=20 >> On 6/8/11 9:40 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Doug Meil wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this >> privilege?" >>>> / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to something >> outside of >>>> the Hadoop umbrella" >>>>=20 >>>> Given the context of the original question, is this debate really >> necessary? >>>> Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out of Hadoop >> (e.g, >>>> there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) It's not like >>>> somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature requests. >>>=20 >>> If HBase needs an API, why wouldn't something else? Why should somethi= ng >> be >>> marked LimitedPrivate to HBase instead of just making it Public and bei= ng >> done >>> with it? >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3638-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:53:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1D174B2A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63686 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:53:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63634 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:53:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63626 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:53:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:53:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:53:21 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so829934wyb.35 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.79.11 with SMTP id h11mr7381194wee.77.1307555580312; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <97A5F450-4DE0-4634-B1FF-0CAEBF6952E6@apache.org> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:53:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from an observer) From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Agree. HDFS is not a general purpose file system. Its API was, and continues to be, co-designed with it's directly adjacent projects (MR, HBase, Hive, Pig etc) in mind. IMO it's one of it's biggest strengths. This is of course does not mean we get to ignore existing users, compatibility concerns, etc. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I too think that LimitedPrivate is a good idea for projects that work > closely with the Hadoop ecosystem (Hive, HBase, MR, etc) It allows us to > experiment with an API, that if proved useful in the longer run, can > graduate to be a public API in future. > > Some people may rightly claim that this gives unfair advantage to project= s > in the Hadoop ecosystem vs projects that are outside of this system, but = I > see no harm in that. One reason for this is that there are many developer= s > who work on multiple of these projects, and it is easier to coordinate > changes among these projects. > > thanks, > -dhruba > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Suresh Srinivas = wrote: > >> I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done >> similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. >> >> Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with >> LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that >> are >> closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. >> {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in t= he >> future. >> >> When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as >> community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that= we >> do not know of breaks! >> >> If others, outside the umbrella of these projects need an API, they coul= d >> open a jira and we could address it. >> >> >> On 6/8/11 9:40 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >> >> > >> > On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:53 AM, Doug Meil wrote: >> >> >> >> Re: "How "closely related" does a project need to be to get this >> privilege?" >> >> / " What is the criteria by which an API gets opened to something >> outside of >> >> the Hadoop umbrella" >> >> >> >> Given the context of the original question, is this debate really >> necessary? >> >> Everybody knows that although HBase is a TLP now it grew out of Hadoo= p >> (e.g, >> >> there's a chapter about HBase in the Hadoop book, etc.) =A0It's not l= ike >> >> somebody from Hypertable was strong-arming for feature requests. >> > >> > If HBase needs an API, why wouldn't something else? =A0Why should some= thing >> be >> > marked LimitedPrivate to HBase instead of just making it Public and be= ing >> done >> > with it? >> >> > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > From general-return-3639-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 11:43:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BA83630F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55013 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 11:43:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54950 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 11:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54942 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 11:43:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:43:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:43:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654941BA955 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:42:39 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id W8zJ6Y3HfWKN for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:42:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3787E1BA943 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:42:37 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308224544.0206@wkDPCuSw5Ri/jnqUajibrQ Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p59BgLIX006595 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:42:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:42:21 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p59BgLIX006595 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06/08/2011 06:41 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done > similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. > > Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with > LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that are > closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. > {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in the > future. I'm going to talk about my experience on the Ant team. One of the lessons of that project is that in the open source world, you can't predict how your code gets used, or control it. If someone wants to take your app and use it as a library -they can. If someone wants to do something completely unexpected with that library -they can. And this is a good thing, because your code gets used. Yes, you get new bugreps, but every person using your code is someone not using somebody elses code. You win. The other lesson from that is the following: in open source, there is no such thing as private code. * If you mark something as package scoped, they just inject their classes into your package (and who hasn't done that with their Hadoop extensions?). * If you mark something as protected, they subclass and open up its privacy. * If you mark something as private, they edit your source and create a new JAR with the relaxed permission for any of these actions, you end up fielding the bugreps, as the stack trace points to you. And it increases maintenance costs for everyone. Alternatively they cut and paste your code into their codebase, possibly -but not always- retaining the apache credits. That * complicates copyright and lawsuits: http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29958 * increases maintenance costs for everyone, especially if there are security issues with the original code. > When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as > community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that we > do not know of breaks! The way Ant handled this with Gump, the nightly clean build of all the OSS Java projects built with Ant http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ For all the projects, they thought they were getting a free CI build run, but what it really was was a regression test of Ant and every single OSS project. If a change in Ant broke anyone's build: we noticed. If a change in Log4J broke a build, someone noticed. It became a rapid-response regression test for the entire OSS suite. Sadly, it doesn't work so well. I'd blame Maven, but the move to ivy dependencies doesn't help either, it complicates classpaths no end. Even so, the idea is great: build and test your downstream applications, and the things you depend on, so you find problems within 24 hours of the change being committed -regardless of which project committed the change. The way to do it now would be with Jenkins, not just building and testing Hadooop-{core, hdfs, mapreduce}, but -building and publishing every upstream dependency. -test against the trunk versions build locally. -build and test against the ivy-versioned artifacts that are controlled by the version.properties Together this flags up when something works against the old artifacts, but doesn't work against the trunk versions: that's their regressions, caught early. Downstream -build and test the OSS projects that work with Hadoop. That's the apache ones: HBase, Mahout, Pig, Hive, Hama etc, and the other ones, such as Cascading. That can be offered as a service to these projects "we will build and test your code against our trunk", a service designed to benefit everyone. They find their bugs, we find regressions. This is a pretty complex project, especially when you think about the challenge of testing your RPM generation code will install the RPMs (I bring up clean CentOS VMs for such a purpose), but without it you don't get everything working together, which is the state things appear to be in today. Ignoring the RPM install & test problems, if people are interested in working on this, we should be able to do a lot of it on Jenkins. Who is willing to get involved? -Steve From general-return-3640-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 14:17:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41B8269B7 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23068 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:17:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22969 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22961 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 14:17:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:17:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:17:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 12284 invoked by uid 507); 9 Jun 2011 14:17:08 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.655884 secs); 09 Jun 2011 14:17:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Jun 2011 14:17:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43541324569 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:17:07 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2n71AYSstLvb; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:17:06 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB78813245B3 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:17:06 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DF0DD55.4000201@uci.cu> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:18:53 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Process to release files signature References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080803030401040702050300" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------080803030401040702050300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Regards to all the list Which is the process that you follow to sign the releases files with Hadoop? md5, sha1? Thanks a lot for your time -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 --------------080803030401040702050300-- From general-return-3641-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 16:12:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7196C6FCD for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82949 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:12:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82807 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:12:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82799 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 16:12:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:12:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:12:50 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1113391pzk.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.27.71 with SMTP id r7mr346060pbg.385.1307635950009; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2sm1512065pbi.83.2011.06.09.09.12.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:12:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-15-763749744 Subject: Re: Process to release files signature Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:12:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4DF0DD55.4000201@uci.cu> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <4DF0DD55.4000201@uci.cu> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-15-763749744 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 9, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > Regards to all the list > Which is the process that you follow to sign the releases files with = Hadoop? > md5, sha1? Both. *grin* As documented in: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease we use "gpg --print-mds" -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-15-763749744-- From general-return-3642-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 16:29:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A8DA6DCE for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40557 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40501 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40489 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 16:29:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:29:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:29:48 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-169-c11.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.169.11]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p59GSPf7057414; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307636907; bh=CBsF6Q0Q/1SMP7laBe9w6lFbLJgr81igl2AZKbHHUAw=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=CCmuOp8WMIAncfhOtDZgop5/HAtndAEjvNvCMSkTkrj7D8vPV0Cdks9RD6IkmaHnM UDkEfzdVJk7b0xGF3Ze5EDGguoFf/nIbJiiFzsyYQiNgYAGbR/rSMuBTxmscZI7qf9 TDq/0o8AhdrGKkshQbUDpDK3tdmanByYcuttOoJU= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:28:25 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "apurtell@apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a = maintainable way. =20 On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> From: Allen Wittenauer >> OK. That's make it easier to just >> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a >> related project." Then we can go back working on core >> Hadoop. >=20 > Seriously?=20 >=20 > Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give = HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. >=20 > - Andy >=20 >=20 From general-return-3643-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 16:45:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F8EE6DD5 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96320 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96157 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96148 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 16:45:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:45:23 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1135052pzk.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.65.75 with SMTP id v11mr481934pbs.56.1307637903140; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm1539288pbk.36.2011.06.09.09.45.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Process to release files signature From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <4DF0DD55.4000201@uci.cu> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:45:00 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <876CA43B-0C59-420E-BAF0-E79C75301FDF@apache.org> References: <4DF0DD55.4000201@uci.cu> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 9, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > Regards to all the list > Which is the process that you follow to sign the releases files with = Hadoop? > md5, sha1? I should also say that we sign our releases with gpg using the private = key of the release manager. -- Owen= From general-return-3644-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:28:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4B4D6DEC for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87156 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:28:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87093 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:28:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87085 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:28:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:28:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:27:58 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1979681wyb.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cwiz6Ud506SsaqyBtbHzVDeffJsIC84On4aKIngCQaM=; b=BylvJdDJAIWPHWK34WKwNk1em4f3ZflAoc3h/cfbjK8Xwndc40+l3WstbCt09CHbzM KglpTbJ/t7AknF5c8NwI/8HE7HWJmg382YkjJKxyN7jSfoMjfnhVQaFh0hdqNLVKKagV LGTg24c1mQEyN2BMI/tRJO9aM2Cm6uWpjAEYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=juP85ZCwqq0cCw2O0fmbRddN5Lx76lOQNK94w7l8LNr++cKp1/OOuzxD6acpS4Y52y 5a0OoVFeByGToUQWWoeHBfwJyFJ/TmZpWYu07eg5rWE2RYf3UK1zW0ePkg4oxcx7JKN6 ycTU49ccYo1Jijr13NXk8WGqj1y0rLIJOmekg= Received: by 10.216.229.3 with SMTP id g3mr6639375weq.91.1307640457186; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.21 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:27:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Tom White Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:27:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these references with Private. We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? Cheers, Tom On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a maintai= nable way. > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >>> From: Allen Wittenauer >>> =A0 =A0 OK. =A0That's make it easier to just >>> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a >>> related project." Then we can go back working on core >>> Hadoop. >> >> Seriously? >> >> Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give HttpS= erver an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. >> >> =A0- Andy >> >> > > From general-return-3645-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:34:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 784826318 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98127 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:34:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97920 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97912 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:34:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:34:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:34:11 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p59HXIc4082312 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:33:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307640799; bh=NZ4ClEuGqv6yHYB7TOdeVsrlse0akQNFmeqwDNKhceg=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=e3XiVfgrG+h+bsW6eP80T6Xd+156XMrKIKt+Icrv4lUABurszViO8D8A3S4qKrQhK SubNeER0KH1pLenqw7eQHFTzDe4+24UTWcN7+DvcsgOOwBCU9SjonKoSiCmpmjjGtz 1AJ3fd61a/1F/qDXqnj3ZvgreNCnwniRAuvkpEpo= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:33:18 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:33:15 -0700 Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) Thread-Index: AcwmmoMt68A03sMaSpiXE+dWTj8GTQAMMzeQ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > The other lesson from that is the following: in open source, there is no > such thing as private code. The goal of InterfaceAudiencme and InterfaceStability is not to prevent som= e one from using the code. It merely suggests who the interface is intended for and its stability. An interface marked Public and Stable guarantees backward compatibility. These are intended for every one to use. Changes to these interfaces must b= e done extra carefully to ensure this. One can still use LimitedPrivate/Private or Unstable/Evolving interfaces outside. But these interfaces can change freely, in non backward compatible way. The interface might even be deleted in future releases. Any one using it, do it at their own risk of seeing their code break and having to change their code as the interface evolves. Regards, Suresh From general-return-3646-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:38:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61D69654B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1720 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:38:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1652 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:38:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1644 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:38:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:38:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:38:32 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1167851pzk.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.54.71 with SMTP id h7mr496657pbp.39.1307641092544; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm1568168pbj.74.2011.06.09.10.38.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:38:08 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Message-ID: <20110609173808.GE3079@tp> References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YToU2i3Vx8H2dn7O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --YToU2i3Vx8H2dn7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on this. I think LimitedPrivate is somewhat moot. It seems to be a better way to just get rid of it. $0.02 Cos On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:27AM, Tom White wrote: > Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate > references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in > Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in > MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or > MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within > Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these > references with Private. >=20 > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? >=20 > Cheers, > Tom >=20 > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: > > I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a maint= ainable way. > > > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > >>> From: Allen Wittenauer > >>> =E2=95=90 =E2=95=90 OK. =E2=95=90That's make it easier to just > >>> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a > >>> related project." Then we can go back working on core > >>> Hadoop. > >> > >> Seriously? > >> > >> Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give Htt= pServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. > >> > >> =E2=95=90- Andy > >> > >> > > > > --YToU2i3Vx8H2dn7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk3xBQAACgkQenyFlstYjhL79gD/T9ZC88aHiuK79dENswLWak24 slZDDansJl+IH7/tQYgBAK+0puL7Yw66jib/lPg3lZg/z436HgCjX7qCKW7Z0qJF =MeXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YToU2i3Vx8H2dn7O-- From general-return-3647-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:57:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 224046E8B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28510 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28463 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28455 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:57:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:57:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:57:02 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p59HuNXg033094 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:56:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307642183; bh=3W6g6KOb65dkFmttcieE9vZ6cI72jTmifR0lHKsQk9w=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=I10zhrjxD9zHuiUb2CWjhqS2xhJCrA77TsxsrRB4NYOPWdXWDXH+7BjZVpCGKfC9i hREi/PMpx1h3PB2hNUyZdnY/BFDr1ExlDlxIkEQ3QAviFAOq9ZrNHQN3n+0uPe+2r+ W0CLLo1WwLEKzU8z+evRQxJMQzul9BSXp8H+WBQM= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:56:22 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:56:20 -0700 Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase Thread-Index: AcwmyqrTmLVTcbKMTFyrOvkSsDRCBAAA968S Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Javadoc did not capture the intent well. Please see HADOOP-5073. We should fix the Javadoc to avoid confusion. Even though there are only few instances of LimitedPrivate, I prefer retaining. I prefer to keep MiniDFSCluster LimitedPrivate and not support a= s as public interface. On 6/9/11 10:27 AM, "Tom White" wrote: > Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate > references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in > Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in > MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or > MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within > Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these > references with Private. >=20 > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? >=20 > Cheers, > Tom >=20 > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a >> maintainable way. >>=20 >> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >>=20 >>>> From: Allen Wittenauer >>>> =A0 =A0 OK. =A0That's make it easier to just >>>> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a >>>> related project." Then we can go back working on core >>>> Hadoop. >>>=20 >>> Seriously? >>>=20 >>> Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give >>> HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. >>>=20 >>> =A0- Andy >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3648-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:03:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03E736F4E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45798 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45744 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45736 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:03:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:03:04 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so1186698pwi.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.29.130 with SMTP id k2mr447329pbh.514.1307642562943; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm1585033pbj.65.2011.06.09.11.02.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:02:39 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Message-ID: <20110609180239.GH3079@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="reI/iBAAp9kzkmX4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --reI/iBAAp9kzkmX4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:56AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Javadoc did not capture the intent well. Please see HADOOP-5073. We should > fix the Javadoc to avoid confusion. >=20 > Even though there are only few instances of LimitedPrivate, I prefer > retaining. I prefer to keep MiniDFSCluster LimitedPrivate and not support= as > as public interface. Suresh, but MiniDFSCluster is a test facility with a somewhat limited functionality. It isn't that important really if it has LimitedPrivate or Private annotation. Cos > On 6/9/11 10:27 AM, "Tom White" wrote: >=20 > > Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate > > references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in > > Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in > > MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or > > MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within > > Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these > > references with Private. > >=20 > > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? > >=20 > > Cheers, > > Tom > >=20 > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > > wrote: > >> I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a > >> maintainable way. > >>=20 > >> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >>=20 > >>>> From: Allen Wittenauer > >>>> =E2=95=90 =E2=95=90 OK. =E2=95=90That's make it easier to just > >>>> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a > >>>> related project." Then we can go back working on core > >>>> Hadoop. > >>>=20 > >>> Seriously? > >>>=20 > >>> Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give > >>> HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you. > >>>=20 > >>> =E2=95=90- Andy > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >>=20 >=20 --reI/iBAAp9kzkmX4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk3xCr4ACgkQenyFlstYjhIpOQEAumim7q3tFcn2Bp7v15oI3nth 7hychA0ZbG5N9cUYr/sA/2p39HMYchYT/eCgF4EA1Kw8G5Ey8yP9Kg9nWC06mNR1 =QLfC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --reI/iBAAp9kzkmX4-- From general-return-3649-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:20:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D97E66113 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73842 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:20:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73776 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73768 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:20:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:20:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:20:40 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3219941qyk.14 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fcRF/10J3DEOxI/UiN6cak0q8O8hJHQb1FjHSmwKluw=; b=D3NuSNFB2yNXNVYkH22LSKKfzUQjKl6lkOm5cMLINvwDZNBbtL0a0QCmGelrnstXxZ FfcTq3UN0GGmYgLkaqyUmSsGCdEkESN7vMiIWreYzYJa1tCtze3+zIl0BhtvD6PmKwRk gsoS31KzCz4jcJbSbsMkQXLx13vwp6BVFA09M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Kj61tk38eBNOVMc/Lm5mlfWf6DKsmLXcbp8wKMpfmBxNBJEFw5Ql+q2j/Sk4xZtMDs cX0MwGRr+ujjcVHBYApruT4JxwEZYCjlx69Xtl4kJxu423CRGGlWFAg7faFRxik0u5wD M8huhFvvBMZYyGB2VzNJ0kY1ibMkXJtMbtvKA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.183.204 with SMTP id ch12mr765474qab.341.1307643620169; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.135 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <08E3D059-20B7-49F4-AA53-C1012C9480A1@apache.org> References: <41B787A2-3FF6-42D6-87E2-38DCBC7174F4@apache.org> <08E3D059-20B7-49F4-AA53-C1012C9480A1@apache.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:20:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IOqY9ji8PXifwOgniXxTTlZvCIc Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Stack wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I have some concerns over the recent usage of LimitedPri= vate being opened up to HBase. =A0Shouldn't HBase really be sticking to pub= lic APIs rather than poking through some holes? =A0If HBase needs an API, w= ouldn't other clients as well? >>> >> >> HBase uses public APIs. =A0A method we relied on went from protected to >> private. =A0Fixing this brought on the flagging of HttpServer with >> LimitedPrivate (HttpServer, the class flagged, is mostly internal to >> Hadoop but HBase, because, in part, of its subproject provenance, >> extends HttpServer providing its UI reusing Hadoop's log level, thread >> dumping, etc., servlets) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0So, no, HBase does not actually use public APIs.... > The move from protected to private was an error rectified by HADOOP-7351. St.Ack From general-return-3650-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:31:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91E966B13 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96064 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:31:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96015 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:31:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96007 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:31:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:31:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:30:56 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1221615qyk.14 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uwahV+K6UoAB1bKXKPyp6LC9avMlRAs9FRL54InE0AA=; b=mzX83ZVtyUahxv3p9o+2hx9my27zf41OUqpfq7Rn6x36dum8lhVnrQ0fNcWiKYbwNE hlCE29lqiJIbHgNb6NfO3s3BppJJGRuz3ZX/vYVh4JlMPOOTiNeb6AF5Twg/rMX34sFz NqufRf4PYLommZep5Ii344BkIV1kJtv+K+1pQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=THffPYkyAskr2WcNHNnvlhE7ImhY1n3/U4KBDNw4ud8swry7loQMEhjN6H6s1kW6ej CzTydZK0DfjzIJYnySNP+gii9mDdzsm35lYXnzJYnPXqfxRTCj+EDd9Jp+NVv2eN3PQL 7TwTBjZWhzKQRtr+ZB6Nfzw695Hq3TLFTLcj0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.209.198 with SMTP id gh6mr782227qab.391.1307644235501; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.135 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:30:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> References: <580675.9102.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4AFD3D6A-9556-4343-91B0-6CA794A0192F@apache.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:30:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CAt9QNpRmUq5EFJrs7hXb9JdQzk Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> >> Perhaps opening a jira for a cleaner framework for HttpServer extension = could be useful? > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Sure. =A0That's probably what should have happened to begi= n with rather than the quickly changing the API to a different classificati= on. It was done in HADOOP-2024 back in 2007. St.Ack From general-return-3651-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 19:23:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F5836FD8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91251 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91182 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91172 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 19:23:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:23:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:23:48 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1245365qwj.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:23:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oOdRUul+urVVzDXceTvRACXE264ZnhwefigCD+wDZ80=; b=Xv1Hi5nkp32iYynM31a/Zeos/vE1MUehIlEHbN5F73QMqJS+Itqn2tE3NkdALeryJP binXRPMIWH/oPvdQx6YKxc3T1g7B2T7OXVyUjQye/AkOUWYFN5X6RtmiJQYWdlfO3EwP yls4xl4o9tdtPG/dfDU9aE2bkV5r8qfJnQukc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=a5y+q8jduSdmGZtHrAZtABlCK/TTi06tSEHy8Mo9rQvIaT7NBm7oqNgzZq6oDqqKNz qUpCtntX3W19QLbuhy8wmpXJr+HXo2Z51/0lDpIpnDqsGJa2BP1OHPCW/gwlMpVxfLPU HucUp+NNMIGX0lidvYWpXvPSX5U0QRXQiCKnc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.183.204 with SMTP id ch12mr821298qab.341.1307647407154; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.135 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:23:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> References: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:23:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jgR5Px8hMY5GVMgqJjm2OmricvI Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nice reality check and thanks for the how it was addressed elsewhere Steve. As you say, it sounds like a large undertaking but it would be a sweet service for the downstreamers. St.Ack On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 06/08/2011 06:41 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >> >> I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done >> similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. >> >> Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with >> LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects that >> are >> closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. >> {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in t= he >> future. > > I'm going to talk about my experience on the Ant team. > > One of the lessons of that project is that in the open source world, you > can't predict how your code gets used, or control it. If someone wants to > take your app and use it as a library -they can. If someone wants to do > something completely unexpected with that library -they can. And this is = a > good thing, because your code gets used. Yes, you get new bugreps, but ev= ery > person using your code is someone not using somebody elses code. You win. > > The other lesson from that is the following: in open source, there is no > such thing as private code. > > * If you mark something as package scoped, they just inject their classes > into your package (and who hasn't done that with their Hadoop extensions?= ). > * If you mark something as protected, they subclass and open up its priva= cy. > * If you mark something as private, they edit your source and create a ne= w > JAR with the relaxed permission > > for any of these actions, you end up fielding the bugreps, as the stack > trace points to you. And it increases maintenance costs for everyone. > > > Alternatively they cut and paste your code into their codebase, possibly > -but not always- retaining the apache credits. > > That > =A0* complicates copyright and lawsuits: > =A0http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=3D29958 > > =A0* increases maintenance costs for everyone, especially if there are > security issues with the original code. > >> When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as >> community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application that >> we >> do not know of breaks! > > The way Ant handled this with Gump, the nightly clean build of all the OS= S > Java projects built with Ant > http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ > > For all the projects, they thought they were getting a free CI build run, > but what it really was was a regression test of Ant and every single OSS > project. If a change in Ant broke anyone's build: we noticed. If a change= in > Log4J broke a build, someone noticed. It became a rapid-response regressi= on > test for the entire OSS suite. > > Sadly, it doesn't work so well. I'd blame Maven, but the move to ivy > dependencies doesn't help either, it complicates classpaths no end. > > Even so, the idea is great: build and test your downstream applications, = and > the things you depend on, so you find problems within 24 hours of the cha= nge > being committed -regardless of which project committed the change. > > The way to do it now would be with Jenkins, not just building and testing > Hadooop-{core, hdfs, mapreduce}, but > =A0-building and publishing every upstream dependency. > =A0-test against the trunk versions build locally. > =A0-build and test against the ivy-versioned artifacts that are controlle= d by > the version.properties > > Together this flags up when something works against the old artifacts, bu= t > doesn't work against the trunk versions: that's their regressions, caught > early. > > Downstream > =A0-build and test the OSS projects that work with Hadoop. > =A0That's the apache ones: HBase, Mahout, Pig, Hive, Hama etc, and the ot= her > ones, such as Cascading. > > That can be offered as a service to these projects "we will build and tes= t > your code against our trunk", a service designed to benefit everyone. The= y > find their bugs, we find regressions. > > This is a pretty complex project, especially when you think about the > challenge of testing your RPM generation code will install the RPMs (I br= ing > up clean CentOS VMs for such a purpose), but without it you don't get > everything working together, which is the state things appear to be in > today. > > Ignoring the RPM install & test problems, if people are interested in > working on this, we should be able to do a lot of it on Jenkins. Who is > willing to get involved? > > -Steve > From general-return-3652-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 02:22:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FF024AFE for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88595 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 02:22:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88534 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 02:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88524 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 02:22:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:22:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:21:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=qfSYkOsauICQMnSVmvkbJW/Ib0GgGunM043uz+02M9qHWndu8ADkRuyU ded1wa6fRrtPWxnNNvtZvokHCHKH60AsIq+ZHKprxzi12Ryf75dMaK0kf dorFgX7BeaoXmk+; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1307672518; x=1339208518; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=TderFz0i7Hhu04tHEVhsnq9vQf0hOize4JDlplEk170=; b=sD7PHYHoqzisXpmqyU0Y8nNfefhL5AyHnwdAgcXxDF1Gw6rBAlX80vgi p89S7uRg7O7ffk5c1JnzP6VJl64wBAomk2nYjnOqBZlCIHet5ZeQYTDrG AmUquyYTNTV08WU; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,344,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="24109196" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:21:37 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) Thread-Topic: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) Thread-Index: AQHMJppoPUQKvSUkokSrJXKzSN4afJS13QiA Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:21:37 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <794563460E14C8419F9FC6DE32BF01BD@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 [Just wondering if one of the criteria for graduating to a top-level project should be "no dependency on the LimitedPrivate APIs of the parent project".] Steve, I agree with your suggestion for a downstream-project-build-and-test instance. All I can say is, "stay tuned". - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 6/9/11 4:42 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >On 06/08/2011 06:41 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >> I do not see any issue with the change that Todd has made. We have done >> similar changes in HDFS-1586 in the past. >> >> Making APIs public comes with a cost. That is what we are avoiding with >> LimitedPrivate. The intention was to include the following projects >>that are >> closely tied to Hadoop as projects eligible for LimitedPrivate. >> {"HBase", "HDFS", "Hive", "MapReduce", "Pig"}. This list could grow in >>the >> future. > >I'm going to talk about my experience on the Ant team. > >One of the lessons of that project is that in the open source world, you >can't predict how your code gets used, or control it. If someone wants >to take your app and use it as a library -they can. If someone wants to >do something completely unexpected with that library -they can. And this >is a good thing, because your code gets used. Yes, you get new bugreps, >but every person using your code is someone not using somebody elses >code. You win. > >The other lesson from that is the following: in open source, there is no >such thing as private code. > >* If you mark something as package scoped, they just inject their >classes into your package (and who hasn't done that with their Hadoop >extensions?). >* If you mark something as protected, they subclass and open up its >privacy. >* If you mark something as private, they edit your source and create a >new JAR with the relaxed permission > >for any of these actions, you end up fielding the bugreps, as the stack >trace points to you. And it increases maintenance costs for everyone. > > >Alternatively they cut and paste your code into their codebase, possibly >-but not always- retaining the apache credits. > >That > * complicates copyright and lawsuits: > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=3D29958 > > * increases maintenance costs for everyone, especially if there are >security issues with the original code. > >> When such projects break because of API change, we can co-ordinate as >> community and fix the issues. This is not true for some application >>that we >> do not know of breaks! > >The way Ant handled this with Gump, the nightly clean build of all the >OSS Java projects built with Ant >http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ > >For all the projects, they thought they were getting a free CI build >run, but what it really was was a regression test of Ant and every >single OSS project. If a change in Ant broke anyone's build: we noticed. >If a change in Log4J broke a build, someone noticed. It became a >rapid-response regression test for the entire OSS suite. > >Sadly, it doesn't work so well. I'd blame Maven, but the move to ivy >dependencies doesn't help either, it complicates classpaths no end. > >Even so, the idea is great: build and test your downstream applications, >and the things you depend on, so you find problems within 24 hours of >the change being committed -regardless of which project committed the >change. > >The way to do it now would be with Jenkins, not just building and >testing Hadooop-{core, hdfs, mapreduce}, but > -building and publishing every upstream dependency. > -test against the trunk versions build locally. > -build and test against the ivy-versioned artifacts that are >controlled by the version.properties > >Together this flags up when something works against the old artifacts, >but doesn't work against the trunk versions: that's their regressions, >caught early. > >Downstream > -build and test the OSS projects that work with Hadoop. > That's the apache ones: HBase, Mahout, Pig, Hive, Hama etc, and the >other ones, such as Cascading. > >That can be offered as a service to these projects "we will build and >test your code against our trunk", a service designed to benefit >everyone. They find their bugs, we find regressions. > >This is a pretty complex project, especially when you think about the >challenge of testing your RPM generation code will install the RPMs (I >bring up clean CentOS VMs for such a purpose), but without it you don't >get everything working together, which is the state things appear to be >in today. > >Ignoring the RPM install & test problems, if people are interested in >working on this, we should be able to do a lot of it on Jenkins. Who is >willing to get involved? > >-Steve From general-return-3653-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:29:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D89A49FE for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40189 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:29:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40145 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40135 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:29:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:29:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hailong.yang1115@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:29:26 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1486842pzk.35 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=LqBgO9KNufLhVhqaMoaeFzenq7ijFMkNL8tfuhHKGqs=; b=KM9MjNRL+5CVI2VndmFiXPr6eRuacX7EK099+o1wquvXEAhcYx9t/659qJTKR4NBFw w2hbhBHg/8ctXoAgUBZGEdDT2WhpH7xS2Vi8Ukdu6PGIYgdRWgGRARjJNMGMlQ0qDshV zDzKuJl4GQRj+6RgbF2ka/RqAndEogBE5uMNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=W6UHoLTnz1qT5coOxjhLberdS4aq61w9nGmI01v8J6GlVSGFkiWox+rh553uqoVj+n GUTLkFp/Ilyohp7QAHdAfnP6cP1Z13F29tOZ7IwWr56xvwXkMI4WbFXxwCoEyuggBr/5 TkR8NxVaLlVvETELykZLu3O/jeyw7goqlL9gI= Received: by 10.143.20.14 with SMTP id x14mr282691wfi.105.1307683744462; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HailongYangLen ([124.205.18.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1sm2029381pbi.31.2011.06.09.22.28.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:28:54 +0800 From: "hailong.yang1115" To: "general" Subject: Problems about the job counters Message-ID: <201106101328462304641@gmail.com> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 26 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon731067674787_=====" --=====003_Dragon731067674787_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, I am trying to the built-in example wordcount with nearly 15GB input. When the Hadoop job finished, I got the following counters. CounterMapReduceTotal Job CountersLaunched reduce tasks001 Rack-local map tasks0035 Launched map tasks002,318 Data-local map tasks002,283 FileSystemCountersFILE_BYTES_READ22,863,580,65617,654,943,34140,518,523,997 HDFS_BYTES_READ154,400,997,4590154,400,997,459 FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN33,490,829,40317,654,943,34151,145,772,744 HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN02,747,356,7042,747,356,704 My question is what does the FILE_BYTES_READ counter mean? And what is the difference between FILE_BYTES_READ and HDFS_BYTES_READ? In my opinion, all the input is located in HDFS, so where does FILE_BYTES_READ come from during the map phase? Any help will be appreciated! Hailong 2011-06-10 *********************************************** * Hailong Yang, PhD. Candidate * Sino-German Joint Software Institute, * School of Computer Science&Engineering, Beihang University * Phone: (86-010)82315908 * Email: hailong.yang1115@gmail.com * Address: G413, New Main Building in Beihang University, * No.37 XueYuan Road,HaiDian District, * Beijing,P.R.China,100191 *********************************************** --=====003_Dragon731067674787_=====-- From general-return-3654-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 09:01:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3CF34E4A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91275 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 09:01:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91210 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 09:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91202 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 09:01:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:01:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD41B7DBF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:01:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KklxEgSQmEgz for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:01:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF608B7DBB for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:01:00 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308301246.81056@Z6W18QAqAz/2t2hNotlZbQ Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5A90kcG006863 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:00:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF1DD3E.5070500@apache.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:00:46 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase (thoughts from the build and test world) References: <4DF0B19D.6050203@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5A90kcG006863 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 06/09/2011 08:23 PM, Stack wrote: > Nice reality check and thanks for the how it was addressed elsewhere Steve. > > As you say, it sounds like a large undertaking but it would be a sweet > service for the downstreamers. as an aside, the thing that usually prevents you using Java apps as libraries is random calls to System.exit(). Hadoop does that; when I brought up nodes in-VM I'd catch those calls in a security manager, convert to RuntimeExceptions and throw them up the stack. IMO it'd be better for the whole hadoop stack to do this rather than have random threads take down the VMs, which is a debugging nightmare From general-return-3655-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 18:20:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A28F47FF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47042 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:20:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46983 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46975 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 18:20:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:20:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:20:43 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1996635bwz.35 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.19.74 with SMTP id z10mr2217055bka.183.1307730021323; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:20:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:20:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:20:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a47e62147604a55f9ffd --00032555a47e62147604a55f9ffd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local mirror of the svn. I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I actually do the commit. Thanks -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00032555a47e62147604a55f9ffd-- From general-return-3656-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 18:34:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AAAD4394 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71051 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:34:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70988 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70980 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 18:34:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:34:52 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so3179943wyb.35 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.62.137 with SMTP id y9mr3632099wec.107.1307730871151; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:34:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:34:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Spectacular. Thanks Todd! On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 this > weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git trees as > well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local mirror of the > svn. > > I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I > actually do the commit. > > Thanks > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3657-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 18:40:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF233480B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83481 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83433 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83425 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:40:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:40:24 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1883332pzk.35 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.191.6 with SMTP id o6mr403996wff.312.1307731204038; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm2527544pbj.41.2011.06.10.11.40.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:40:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2A5D0706-BAAD-4C3A-9463-ADE78877F33C@apache.org> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 this > weekend. Thanks Todd for all of your work getting the details worked out and tested. -- Owen From general-return-3658-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:26:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2237845AF for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88956 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88319 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88311 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:26:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:26:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:26:28 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3113628bwz.35 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.74.70 with SMTP id t6mr545733bkj.21.1307849168173; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:26:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:25:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:25:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7847916bc4c04a57b5db4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7847916bc4c04a57b5db4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evening. Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the big button tomorrow. Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at around 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to please hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. Thanks -Todd On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 this > weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git trees as > well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local mirror of the > svn. > > I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I > actually do the commit. > > Thanks > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d7847916bc4c04a57b5db4-- From general-return-3659-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 18:32:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A24F441D8 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59505 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:32:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59436 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59428 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 18:32:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:32:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:31:57 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4400771wwi.29 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.15.137 with SMTP id f9mr4192946wef.62.1307903496898; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.205 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <31722744-6C23-4AB0-BB5C-86CE3D2A3522@mac.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> <31722744-6C23-4AB0-BB5C-86CE3D2A3522@mac.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:31:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds like hdfs proxy isn't being maintained. The hdfs proxy tests were disabled as part of HDFS-1666 because no one would maintain it. If it's not going to be maintained we should remove it, currently HDFS-1666 is a blocker for 0.22 because we don't want to release bitrot'd code to users as part of 22. Let's remove the current hdfsproxy in contrib and then either add the features to HDFS directly (Sanjay suggested above might be an option) or we can add a new non-contrib one (Alejandro built a nice working one that just needs docs and some more tests that he could contribute). Owen - is that an acceptable solution to you? HDSF-1666 is the last blocker for 0.22 and we'd like to make progress on the release. Thanks, Eli On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > AFAICT, Owen was the one to -1 removal of HDFS Proxy. =A0Owen, are you gu= ys maintaining this? > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Could those of you who -1ed the removal of HDFS Proxy please look into t= he >> test that has been failing our Hudson build for the last several months: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1666 >> >> It is one thing to say = that >> we "should" maintain a piece of code, but it's another to actually maint= ain >> it. In my mind, part of maintaining a project involves addressing consis= tent >> test failures as high priority items. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> For closure, this vote fails due to a couple binding -1 votes. >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Bernd, >>>> >>>> Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but >>> Hadoop is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and >>> cluster sizes. >>>> >>>> There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People >>> select =A0 Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / p= roblem >>> grows, Hadoop can grow with it. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> E14 - via iPhone >>>> >>>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" < >>> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote= : >>>>>> Hi Bernd. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>>>>>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>>>>>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed= in >>>>>>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>>>>> >>>>>> This has been the situation in the past, >>>>>> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the mai= n >>> code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 >>> branch, >>>>>> and their recent commits to trunk. >>>>>> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and >>> sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing= your >>> concerns. >>>>>> >>>>>> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, se= e >>> the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in >>> MAPREDUCE-279. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understan= d >>> there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >>>>> >>>>> I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. >>>>> Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't thin= k >>>>> that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into >>>>> the right direction. >>>>> >>>>>>> This is open source development upside down. >>>>>>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >>>>>>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for ever= y >>>>>>> line of code changed. >>>>>>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP >>> clearance process. >>>>>>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the op= en >>>>>>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >>>>>>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained >>> here. >>>>>>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >>>>>>> Release branches stagnate. >>>>>> >>>>>> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being >>> extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. >>>>>> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at lea= st >>> 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for >>> someone to verify. >>>>> >>>>> It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get >>>>> there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this >>>>> size. >>>>> >>>>>>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >>>>>>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >>>>>>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate >>> doors. >>>>>>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs= ( >>>>>>> >>> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen= / >>>>>>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >>>>>>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >>>>>>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this = is >>>>>>> an improvement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >>>>>>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >>>>>>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >>>>>>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months= , >>>>>>> well, so be it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >>>>>>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >>>>>>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium size= d >>>>>>> cluster instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out the= re >>> who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate = to >>> see hadoop become something that only runs well on >>>>>> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. >>>>> >>>>> But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. >>>>> >>>>> Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phas= e >>>>> into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized >>>>> clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month >>>>> time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open >>>>> source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without >>>>> becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on >>>>> the low-end and medium sized users. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end >>>>> users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* >>>>> obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and >>>>> developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't >>>>> need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, >>>>> they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. >>>>> All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don'= t >>>>> have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. >>>>> >>>>> Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to >>>>> the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big >>>>> companies either. >>>>> Focus on all the users. >>>>> >>>>> Bernd >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > From general-return-3660-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 21:51:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00ADD4CA2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19920 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 21:51:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19854 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 21:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19843 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 21:51:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:51:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:51:09 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3616090bwz.35 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.35.1 with SMTP id su1mr3989405bkb.129.1307915448875; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:50:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52c64dfb9fbee04a58acb20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec52c64dfb9fbee04a58acb20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to go. I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that this should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it might stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things are ready to go on the new layout. I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling them one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. -Todd On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evening. > Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the big > button tomorrow. > > Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at around > 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to please > hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. > > Thanks > -Todd > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git >> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local >> mirror of the svn. >> >> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >> actually do the commit. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec52c64dfb9fbee04a58acb20-- From general-return-3661-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 22:14:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEEF44647 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36951 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36895 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36887 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.88 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.88] (HELO asmtpout013.mac.com) (17.148.16.88) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:14:36 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.17] (c-76-103-137-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.137.188]) by asmtp013.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LMP004KS73PBS20@asmtp013.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:14:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-06-12_08:2011-06-10,2011-06-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1106120145 References: <5786C837-900C-4371-A3D2-568F1E2F8264@yahoo-inc.com> In-reply-to: Message-id: <79D95D0B-2CE7-4BDE-9857-C4D359D23A97@mac.com> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8J2) From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:14:19 -0700 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry I missed this thread earlier. I'm not going to worry about the water under the bridge at this point, but going forward I would like to only include those issues marked as blocker. If a new issue crops up I will be taking a closer look at it and may push back. We've got less than 10 issues left to go :-) Cheers, Nige Sent from my iPad On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > >> I propose just to make them blockers before committing to attract attention >> of the release manager and get his approval. Imho, even small changes, like >> HDFS-1954 are blockers, because a vague UI message is bug and bugs are >> blockers. >> > > Bugs are blockers? Then we'll never release! > > Let's hear from Nigel what he thinks. It's his branch, if he's upset about > the way it's being handled, he can deal with it as he sees fit. > > -Todd > > >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I can see them well. >>>> I think Suresh's point is that non-blockers are going into 0.22. >>>> Nigel, do you have full control over it? >>>> >>> >>> Of course it's up to Nigel to decide, but here's my personal opinion: >>> >>> One of the reasons we had a lot of divergence (read: external >>> branches/forks/whatever) off of 0.20 is that the commit rules on the >> branch >>> were held pretty strictly. So, if you wanted a non-critical bug fix or a >>> small improvement, the only option was to do such things on an external >>> fork. 0.20 was branched in December '08 and not released until mid April >>> '09. In 4 months a fair number of bug fixes and small improvements go in. >>> 0.22 has been around even longer. If we were to keep it to *only* >> blockers, >>> then again it would be a fairly useless release due to the number of >>> non-blocker bugs. >>> >>> Clearly there's a balance and a judgment call when moving things back to >> a >>> branch. But at this point I'd consider small improvements and pretty much >>> any bug fix to be reasonable, so long as it doesn't involve major >> reworking >>> of components. Nigel: if this assumption doesn't jive (ha ha, get it?) >> with >>> what you're thinking, please let me know :) >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler < >>> eric14@yahoo-inc.com >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> makes sense to me, but it might be good to work to make these >> decisions >>>>> visible so folks can understand what is happening. >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I see that there are several non blockers being promoted to 0.22 >>> from >>>>> trunk. >>>>>>> From my understanding, any non blocker change to 0.22 should be >>>> approved >>>>> by >>>>>>> vote. Is this correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, the Release Manager has full control over what goes into a >>> release. >>>>> The PMC votes on it once there is a release candidate. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Owen >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3662-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 23:39:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECD8F49F2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80852 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:39:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80791 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:39:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80783 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 23:39:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:39:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:39:39 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3665483bwz.35 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.71.193 with SMTP id i1mr4265886bkj.102.1307921958181; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:38:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:38:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b6c9b61caa04a58c4fc6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b6c9b61caa04a58c4fc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commit to the new trees. Here are some instructions for the migration: === SVN users === Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ subdirectory. This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for the combined SVN trees are: trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ branch-0.22: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 branch-0.21: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 yahoo-merge: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouched. You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdfs trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reason you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point to its new location, you can use the following incantation: svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') === Git Users === The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commits near the top that look like this: Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a single tree (project unsplit) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 Relocate common into common/ The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg --follow). For example: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | head -10 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of JobTrackerStatus. ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options. Contributed by Ari Rabkin. If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition it to the new combined repo, I did the following: # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ git fetch splithdfs # Checkout a branch in my combined repo git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory (I was surprised and impressed by this!) If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch inside of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. For less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase. Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. == Outstanding issues == The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds should be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed file names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this is to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative --no-prefix diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt ... I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the cracks. Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. -Todd On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to go. > I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). > > ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that this > should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it might > stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things are > ready to go on the new layout. > > I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling them > one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. > > -Todd > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evening. >> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the big >> button tomorrow. >> >> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at around >> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to please >> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git >>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local >>> mirror of the svn. >>> >>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >>> actually do the commit. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c5b6c9b61caa04a58c4fc6-- From general-return-3663-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 07:40:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A21604D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29439 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 07:40:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29369 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 07:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29361 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 07:40:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:40:12 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so4671327wyb.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.231.89 with SMTP id k67mr4554381weq.113.1307950791051; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:39:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:39:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nice work Todd. Thank you for making this happen! On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! > > I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commi= t > to the new trees. > > Here are some instructions for the migration: > > =3D=3D=3D SVN users =3D=3D=3D > > Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up > seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ subdirecto= ry. > This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for = the > combined SVN trees are: > > trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ > branch-0.22: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 > branch-0.21: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 > yahoo-merge: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge > =A0(this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) > MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 > =A0(this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) > > The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. > Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouche= d. > > You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdf= s > trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reas= on > you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point t= o > its new location, you can use the following incantation: > svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed > 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') > > =3D=3D=3D Git Users =3D=3D=3D > The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commit= s > near the top that look like this: > > Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: =A0 Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 > > =A0 =A0HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR= in a > single tree (project unsplit) > > =A0 =A0git-svn-id: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb= -0310-9956-ffa450edef68 > > commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: =A0 Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 > > =A0 =A0Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > > commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: =A0 Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 > > =A0 =A0Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ > > commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: =A0 Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 > > =A0 =A0Relocate common into common/ > > The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the > pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track > changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg > --follow). For example: > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=3Doneline --abbrev-c= ommit > --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | he= ad > -10 > 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of > JobTrackerStatus. > ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to > aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles > 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options= . > Contributed by Ari Rabkin. > > If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the > project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in > hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: > 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For > example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition= it > to the new combined repo, I did the following: > > # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: > git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ > git fetch splithdfs > > # Checkout a branch in my combined repo > git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 > > # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch > git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 > > ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory= (I > was surprised and impressed by this!) > If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be > smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch insid= e > of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. F= or > less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the > patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase= . > Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. > > > =3D=3D Outstanding issues =3D=3D > > The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds shou= ld > be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the > combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a > diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed fil= e > names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this= is > to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass > "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative > --no-prefix > diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt > ... > > > I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the crac= ks. > Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. > > -Todd > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to g= o. >> I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). >> >> ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that th= is >> should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it m= ight >> stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things= are >> ready to go on the new layout. >> >> I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling t= hem >> one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evenin= g. >>> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press th= e big >>> button tomorrow. >>> >>> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at arou= nd >>> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to plea= se >>> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote= : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >>>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the gi= t >>>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a loca= l >>>> mirror of the svn. >>>> >>>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >>>> actually do the commit. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Todd >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3664-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 13:25:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70E806BAF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36882 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:25:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36807 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:25:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36799 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 13:25:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:25:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:24:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 20140 invoked by uid 507); 13 Jun 2011 13:24:31 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.642131 secs); 13 Jun 2011 13:24:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2011 13:24:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DE23DC009 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:26:18 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxuQDelPbfoZ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:26:17 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A185C3DC007 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:26:17 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DF61707.4070902@uci.cu> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:26:23 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Development Branch for the Hadoop Next Generation References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010902030407040008010602" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------010902030407040008010602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I was reading the Hadoop Next Generation post on the YDN by Arun (http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/), and I was wondering if this development is public and where I can find the sources for this? Regards and thanks a lot for reading -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 --------------010902030407040008010602-- From general-return-3665-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 13:32:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 443D46A19 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48254 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48196 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48188 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 13:32:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:32:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:32:32 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5975177iwr.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.219.65 with SMTP id ht1mr7085606icb.14.1307971931119; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:32:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.218.72 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:31:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF61707.4070902@uci.cu> References: <4DF61707.4070902@uci.cu> From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:01:51 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Development Branch for the Hadoop Next Generation To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Right now, its in the public SVN branch of MapReduce named "MR-279". See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279, which is its giant umbrella ticket. It may be merging into trunk (0.23) sometime soon in the future, though. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > I was reading the Hadoop Next Generation post on the YDN by Arun > (http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/= ), > and > I was wondering if this development is public and where I can find the > sources for this? > Regards and thanks a lot for reading > > > -- > Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > =A0Software Engineer (UCI) > =A0http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com > =A0http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 > > > --=20 Harsh J From general-return-3666-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 13:43:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1BC36809 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70764 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:43:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70709 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70701 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 13:43:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:43:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 28595 invoked by uid 507); 13 Jun 2011 13:42:51 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.652667 secs); 13 Jun 2011 13:42:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2011 13:42:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A18814C4029; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:42:50 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s5au-jCJuGL4; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:42:49 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AE114C400C; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:42:48 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DF61B52.9000102@uci.cu> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:44:42 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harsh J CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Development Branch for the Hadoop Next Generation References: <4DF61707.4070902@uci.cu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090601060406090607000502" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------090601060406090607000502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/13/2011 09:01 AM, Harsh J wrote: > Right now, its in the public SVN branch of MapReduce named "MR-279". > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279, which is its > giant umbrella ticket. It may be merging into trunk (0.23) sometime > soon in the future, though. > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >> I was reading the Hadoop Next Generation post on the YDN by Arun >> (http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/), >> and >> I was wondering if this development is public and where I can find the >> sources for this? >> Regards and thanks a lot for reading >> >> >> -- >> Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda >> Software Engineer (UCI) >> http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com >> http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 >> >> >> > > Good. Thanks a lot, Harsh It's a very interesting work. Why is been merged to the 0.23 version? -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 --------------090601060406090607000502-- From general-return-3667-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 13:59:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2009461A5 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97901 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:59:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97711 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 13:59:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97569 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 13:59:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:59:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:59:08 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DDwSK3007009; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:58:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307973509; bh=A46zXJhEItleDyOTgGOyoEA3cK7HobsrU/S33GgUaaY=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=FDk4P9YytpTE/z+A7d9ed+PegR1VP0kRKF2jaTDFNyihRSK8+bEMBrWg8EyQ2neNu /QtKAvp6c+rx6U/VhqcaZwRD8i+ZxnO6JUiELEW8piuV/rTgojfknZDj4Ng2QTsZpD OmwCosQHIAThgNoHIlACZTfqwSzW6fFghFna3yIU= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:58:28 -0700 From: Robert Evans To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Harsh J Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:58:28 -0700 Subject: Re: Development Branch for the Hadoop Next Generation Thread-Topic: Development Branch for the Hadoop Next Generation Thread-Index: Acwpz+6PDKl02YjfTkO7ji/ILVVEJQAAgngv Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DF61B52.9000102@uci.cu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA1B81B424E0Devansyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CA1B81B424E0Devansyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 0.23 is trunk right now. 0.22 was branched for stabilization before release= . --Bobby On 6/13/11 9:14 AM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: On 06/13/2011 09:01 AM, Harsh J wrote: > Right now, its in the public SVN branch of MapReduce named "MR-279". > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279, which is its > giant umbrella ticket. It may be merging into trunk (0.23) sometime > soon in the future, though. > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >> I was reading the Hadoop Next Generation post on the YDN by Arun >> (http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen= /), >> and >> I was wondering if this development is public and where I can find the >> sources for this? >> Regards and thanks a lot for reading >> >> >> -- >> Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda >> Software Engineer (UCI) >> http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com >> http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 >> >> >> > > Good. Thanks a lot, Harsh It's a very interesting work. Why is been merged to the 0.23 version? -- Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 --_000_CA1B81B424E0Devansyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3668-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 14:05:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 298EA6978 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10054 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:05:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9991 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9981 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 14:05:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:43 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DE5395084255 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307973903; bh=gv4sxLB+dUGYgWM8i6PADiXFs6JumMaFrt5jHzmiL8Q=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=GQ5tjmzUU+uVz4+PiK1M+HcGmJBKBNjP3lpmC6/GPANzTqVSXVOIAdagGcV0a3NF2 CzBD43hkQTVtIg/olUBFpB2szRzBkI+8HEQDimMqYlz6a2yu1naltwAFBl3askEduO 7GAEjQGV7cWcqS8YqJzXVm/tmLOM9AFZRtTHWMWI= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:05:03 -0700 From: Robert Evans To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:05:01 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: AcwpWiyLtLgAt/gQSPmqE/fuBKRFlAAeLYm0 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA1B833D24E16evansyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CA1B833D24E16evansyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could someone unlock some of these branches for anonymous read only checkou= t? At least with MR-279 I get a 403 forbidden error when I try to check out= . --Bobby On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commit to the new trees. Here are some instructions for the migration: =3D=3D=3D SVN users =3D=3D=3D Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ subdirectory= . This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for th= e combined SVN trees are: trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ branch-0.22: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 branch-0.21: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 yahoo-merge: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouched. You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdfs trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reason you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point to its new location, you can use the following incantation: svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') =3D=3D=3D Git Users =3D=3D=3D The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commits near the top that look like this: Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a single tree (project unsplit) git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb-0= 310-9956-ffa450edef68 commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 Relocate common into common/ The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg --follow). For example: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=3Doneline --abbrev-com= mit --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | head -10 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of JobTrackerStatus. ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options. Contributed by Ari Rabkin. If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition i= t to the new combined repo, I did the following: # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ git fetch splithdfs # Checkout a branch in my combined repo git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory (= I was surprised and impressed by this!) If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch inside of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. For less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase. Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. =3D=3D Outstanding issues =3D=3D The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds should be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed file names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this i= s to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative --no-prefix diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt ... I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the cracks= . Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. -Todd On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to go= . > I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). > > ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that thi= s > should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it mi= ght > stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things = are > ready to go on the new layout. > > I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling th= em > one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. > > -Todd > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evening= . >> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the= big >> button tomorrow. >> >> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at aroun= d >> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to pleas= e >> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git >>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local >>> mirror of the svn. >>> >>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >>> actually do the commit. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --_000_CA1B833D24E16evansyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3669-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 14:52:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 874656685 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83365 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:52:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83314 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:52:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83306 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 14:52:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:52:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:52:43 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4352079bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.74.70 with SMTP id t6mr1979167bkj.21.1307976741204; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:52:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7847908b55304a599117b --0016e6d7847908b55304a599117b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Robert, It seems to be working for me... what URL are you trying to check out? I moved aside my ~/.subversion dir, and then did: $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/ Thanks -Todd On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Robert Evans wrote: > Could someone unlock some of these branches for anonymous read only > checkout? At least with MR-279 I get a 403 forbidden error when I try to > check out. > > --Bobby > > On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > > OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! > > I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commit > to the new trees. > > Here are some instructions for the migration: > > === SVN users === > > Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up > seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ > subdirectory. > This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for > the > combined SVN trees are: > > trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ > branch-0.22: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 > branch-0.21: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 > yahoo-merge: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge > (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) > MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 > (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) > > The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. > Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouched. > > You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdfs > trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reason > you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point to > its new location, you can use the following incantation: > svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed > 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') > > === Git Users === > The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commits > near the top that look like this: > > Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 > > HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a > single tree (project unsplit) > > git-svn-id: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb- > 0310-9956-ffa450edef68 > > commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 > > Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > > commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 > > Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ > > commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 > > Relocate common into common/ > > The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the > pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track > changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg > --follow). For example: > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=oneline > --abbrev-commit > --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | head > -10 > 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of > JobTrackerStatus. > ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to > aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles > 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options. > Contributed by Ari Rabkin. > > If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the > project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in > hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: > 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For > example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition > it > to the new combined repo, I did the following: > > # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: > git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ > git fetch splithdfs > > # Checkout a branch in my combined repo > git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 > > # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch > git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 > > ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory > (I > was surprised and impressed by this!) > If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be > smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch inside > of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. For > less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the > patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase. > Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. > > > == Outstanding issues == > > The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds should > be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the > combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a > diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed file > names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this > is > to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass > "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative > --no-prefix > diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt > ... > > > I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the > cracks. > Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. > > -Todd > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to > go. > > I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). > > > > ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that > this > > should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it > might > > stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things > are > > ready to go on the new layout. > > > > I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling > them > > one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this > evening. > >> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the > big > >> button tomorrow. > >> > >> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at > around > >> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to > please > >> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Todd > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 > >>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git > >>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local > >>> mirror of the svn. > >>> > >>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I > >>> actually do the commit. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Todd > >>> -- > >>> Todd Lipcon > >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Todd Lipcon > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d7847908b55304a599117b-- From general-return-3670-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 14:58:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18D2467B4 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94940 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:58:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94885 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:58:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94877 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 14:58:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:58:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:58:09 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4360872bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.35.1 with SMTP id su1mr4688732bkb.129.1307977069151; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:57:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:57:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52c64df94c4f704a599246d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec52c64df94c4f704a599246d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hmm, as I got farther down my email this morning, I saw some complaints that HBase's SVN was giving 403s as well, this morning. Perhaps there is some ASF-wide issue going on, completely unrelated to the Hadoop changes over the weekend? -Todd On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Robert, > > It seems to be working for me... what URL are you trying to check out? > I moved aside my ~/.subversion dir, and then did: > $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/ > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Robert Evans wrote: > >> Could someone unlock some of these branches for anonymous read only >> checkout? At least with MR-279 I get a 403 forbidden error when I try to >> check out. >> >> --Bobby >> >> On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >> >> OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! >> >> I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commit >> to the new trees. >> >> Here are some instructions for the migration: >> >> === SVN users === >> >> Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up >> seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ >> subdirectory. >> This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for >> the >> combined SVN trees are: >> >> trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ >> branch-0.22: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 >> branch-0.21 >> : >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 >> yahoo-merge >> : >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge >> (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) >> MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 >> (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) >> >> The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. >> Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained >> untouched. >> >> You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdfs >> trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some >> reason >> you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point to >> its new location, you can use the following incantation: >> svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed >> 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') >> >> === Git Users === >> The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commits >> near the top that look like this: >> >> Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 >> >> HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a >> single tree (project unsplit) >> >> git-svn-id: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb- >> 0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >> >> commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> >> commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ >> >> commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate common into common/ >> >> The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the >> pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track >> changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg >> --follow). For example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=oneline >> --abbrev-commit >> --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | >> head >> -10 >> 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of >> JobTrackerStatus. >> ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to >> aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles >> 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options. >> Contributed by Ari Rabkin. >> >> If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the >> project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in >> hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: >> 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> >> In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For >> example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition >> it >> to the new combined repo, I did the following: >> >> # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: >> git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ >> git fetch splithdfs >> >> # Checkout a branch in my combined repo >> git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 >> >> # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch >> git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 >> >> ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory >> (I >> was surprised and impressed by this!) >> If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be >> smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch inside >> of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. >> For >> less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the >> patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase. >> Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. >> >> >> == Outstanding issues == >> >> The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds >> should >> be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the >> combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a >> diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed file >> names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this >> is >> to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass >> "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative >> --no-prefix >> diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt >> ... >> >> >> I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the >> cracks. >> Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. >> >> -Todd >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >> > All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to >> go. >> > I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). >> > >> > ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that >> this >> > should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it >> might >> > stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things >> are >> > ready to go on the new layout. >> > >> > I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling >> them >> > one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. >> > >> > -Todd >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this >> evening. >> >> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press >> the big >> >> button tomorrow. >> >> >> >> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at >> around >> >> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to >> please >> >> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -Todd >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >> >>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the >> git >> >>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a >> local >> >>> mirror of the svn. >> >>> >> >>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >> >>> actually do the commit. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> -Todd >> >>> -- >> >>> Todd Lipcon >> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Todd Lipcon >> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Todd Lipcon >> > Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec52c64df94c4f704a599246d-- From general-return-3671-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:06:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47B57610E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13636 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13533 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13525 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:06:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:06:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:06:16 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DF5YiX024771 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:05:34 -0700 From: Jeffrey Naisbitt To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:05:32 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: AcwpWg7IMsdIjZLTQm2/+zQZPXnG9AAgUgkz Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org When I checkout the yahoo-merge branch, I see these svn externals warnings: svn: warning: Error handling externals definition for 'yahoo-merge/hdfs/src/test/bin': svn: warning: URL=20 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/bin' at revision 1135120 doesn't exist svn: warning: Error handling externals definition for 'yahoo-merge/mapreduce/src/test/bin': svn: warning: URL=20 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/bin' at revision 1135120 doesn't exist Also, the ant eclipse targets seem to be broken now. It seems like various parts of the eclipse target need to be commonized now (the .eclipse-templates stuff and .classpath, .launches, etc.) -Jeff On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! >=20 > I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commi= t > to the new trees. >=20 > Here are some instructions for the migration: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D SVN users =3D=3D=3D >=20 > Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up > seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ subdirecto= ry. > This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for = the > combined SVN trees are: >=20 > trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ > branch-0.22: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 > branch-0.21: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 > yahoo-merge: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge > (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) > MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 > (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) >=20 > The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. > Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouche= d. >=20 > You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdf= s > trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reas= on > you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point t= o > its new location, you can use the following incantation: > svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed > 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') >=20 > =3D=3D=3D Git Users =3D=3D=3D > The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commit= s > near the top that look like this: >=20 > Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 >=20 > HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in= a > single tree (project unsplit) >=20 > git-svn-id: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb= -0310 > -9956-ffa450edef68 >=20 > commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 >=20 > Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >=20 > commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 >=20 > Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ >=20 > commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a > Author: Todd Lipcon > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 >=20 > Relocate common into common/ >=20 > The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the > pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track > changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg > --follow). For example: >=20 > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=3Doneline --abbrev-c= ommit > --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | he= ad > -10 > 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of > JobTrackerStatus. > ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to > aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles > 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options= . > Contributed by Ari Rabkin. >=20 > If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the > project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in > hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: > 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >=20 > In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For > example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition= it > to the new combined repo, I did the following: >=20 > # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: > git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ > git fetch splithdfs >=20 > # Checkout a branch in my combined repo > git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 >=20 > # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch > git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 >=20 > ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory= (I > was surprised and impressed by this!) > If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be > smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch insid= e > of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. F= or > less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the > patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase= . > Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D Outstanding issues =3D=3D >=20 > The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds shou= ld > be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the > combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a > diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed fil= e > names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this= is > to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass > "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: >=20 > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative > --no-prefix > diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt > ... >=20 >=20 > I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the crac= ks. > Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. >=20 > -Todd >=20 >=20 > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >=20 >> All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to g= o. >> I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). >>=20 >> ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that th= is >> should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it m= ight >> stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things= are >> ready to go on the new layout. >>=20 >> I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling t= hem >> one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. >>=20 >> -Todd >>=20 >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi all, >>>=20 >>> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evenin= g. >>> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press th= e big >>> button tomorrow. >>>=20 >>> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at arou= nd >>> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to plea= se >>> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >>>=20 >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote= : >>>=20 >>>> Hi all, >>>>=20 >>>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >>>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the gi= t >>>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a loca= l >>>> mirror of the svn. >>>>=20 >>>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >>>> actually do the commit. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>> -Todd >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3672-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:12:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E91C63EB for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26911 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:12:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26828 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26820 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:12:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:12:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:12:09 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DFAthp026465 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:10:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1307977855; bh=VKyYiNhKxDPB31gHinWA1rm46E+n5vzTFg8OTpxqjeo=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=thzTKUAOrz7qNeuCXSMpKbJ2cHhFLtgBGAxHATywpu7lRv4CxJ5RIjippo1eqG7UE V7OjZK2ZVruoxRg852mWn7OEI2K+pAXxsnLEG8ecNVrLn0QtCyAL0jcoTbE+5S6lKq Ac9Yzh77cF/53rMbfAhWSRbhMtXk/s1k+x7STRQs= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:10:54 -0700 From: Robert Evans To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:10:52 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: Acwp2mQs9RKc727US1axwzGEdZpNqAAAbF/l Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA1B92AD24F23evansyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_CA1B92AD24F23evansyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Todd, It seems to be working now, so whatever it was it is now gone. --Bobby On 6/13/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: Hmm, as I got farther down my email this morning, I saw some complaints tha= t HBase's SVN was giving 403s as well, this morning. Perhaps there is some ASF-wide issue going on, completely unrelated to the Hadoop changes over th= e weekend? -Todd On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Robert, > > It seems to be working for me... what URL are you trying to check out? > I moved aside my ~/.subversion dir, and then did: > $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/ > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Robert Evans wrote= : > >> Could someone unlock some of these branches for anonymous read only >> checkout? At least with MR-279 I get a 403 forbidden error when I try to >> check out. >> >> --Bobby >> >> On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >> >> OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! >> >> I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to comm= it >> to the new trees. >> >> Here are some instructions for the migration: >> >> =3D=3D=3D SVN users =3D=3D=3D >> >> Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up >> seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ >> subdirectory. >> This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for >> the >> combined SVN trees are: >> >> trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ >> branch-0.22: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 >> branch-0.21 >> : >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 >> yahoo-merge >> : >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge >> (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) >> MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 >> (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) >> >> The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. >> Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained >> untouched. >> >> You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hd= fs >> trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some >> reason >> you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point = to >> its new location, you can use the following incantation: >> svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed >> 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') >> >> =3D=3D=3D Git Users =3D=3D=3D >> The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commi= ts >> near the top that look like this: >> >> Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 >> >> HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in= a >> single tree (project unsplit) >> >> git-svn-id: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47b= b- >> 0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >> >> commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> >> commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ >> >> commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate common into common/ >> >> The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the >> pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track >> changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg >> --follow). For example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=3Doneline >> --abbrev-commit >> --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | >> head >> -10 >> 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of >> JobTrackerStatus. >> ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity t= o >> aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles >> 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated option= s. >> Contributed by Ari Rabkin. >> >> If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through th= e >> project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in >> hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: >> 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> >> In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For >> example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transitio= n >> it >> to the new combined repo, I did the following: >> >> # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: >> git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ >> git fetch splithdfs >> >> # Checkout a branch in my combined repo >> git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 >> >> # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch >> git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 >> >> ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirector= y >> (I >> was surprised and impressed by this!) >> If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be >> smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch insi= de >> of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. >> For >> less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on th= e >> patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebas= e. >> Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. >> >> >> =3D=3D Outstanding issues =3D=3D >> >> The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds >> should >> be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the >> combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export = a >> diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed fi= le >> names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for thi= s >> is >> to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass >> "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative >> --no-prefix >> diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt >> ... >> >> >> I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the >> cracks. >> Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. >> >> -Todd >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >> > All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to >> go. >> > I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). >> > >> > ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that >> this >> > should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it >> might >> > stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when thin= gs >> are >> > ready to go on the new layout. >> > >> > I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling >> them >> > one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. >> > >> > -Todd >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote= : >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this >> evening. >> >> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press >> the big >> >> button tomorrow. >> >> >> >> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at >> around >> >> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to >> please >> >> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -Todd >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-71= 06 >> >>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the >> git >> >>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a >> local >> >>> mirror of the svn. >> >>> >> >>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >> >>> actually do the commit. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> -Todd >> >>> -- >> >>> Todd Lipcon >> >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Todd Lipcon >> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Todd Lipcon >> > Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --_000_CA1B92AD24F23evansyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3673-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:14:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DF9D65B4 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32161 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32093 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:14:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32085 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:14:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:43 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4387025bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.74.70 with SMTP id t6mr2001597bkj.21.1307978063231; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:14:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d78479d53ade04a5995fc9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d78479d53ade04a5995fc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt wrote: > When I checkout the yahoo-merge branch, I see these svn externals warnings: > svn: warning: Error handling externals definition for > 'yahoo-merge/hdfs/src/test/bin': > svn: warning: URL > 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/bin' at > revision 1135120 doesn't exist > svn: warning: Error handling externals definition for > 'yahoo-merge/mapreduce/src/test/bin': > svn: warning: URL > 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/bin' at > revision 1135120 doesn't exist > Oops, sorry about that one. I will take care of that in about 30 minutes (just headed out the door now to catch a train). If someone else with commit access wants to, you just need to propset the externals to point to th new common/trunk/common/src/test/bin instead of the old location. > Also, the ant eclipse targets seem to be broken now. It seems like various > parts of the eclipse target need to be commonized now (the > .eclipse-templates stuff and .classpath, .launches, etc.) > > Will look into this as well. -Todd > > On 6/12/11 6:38 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > > > OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! > > > > I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to > commit > > to the new trees. > > > > Here are some instructions for the migration: > > > > === SVN users === > > > > Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up > > seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ > subdirectory. > > This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for > the > > combined SVN trees are: > > > > trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ > > branch-0.22: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 > > branch-0.21: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 > > yahoo-merge: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge > > (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) > > MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 > > (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) > > > > The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. > > Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained > untouched. > > > > You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and > hdfs > > trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some > reason > > you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point > to > > its new location, you can use the following incantation: > > svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed > > 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') > > > > === Git Users === > > The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 > commits > > near the top that look like this: > > > > Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f > > Author: Todd Lipcon > > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 > > > > HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in > a > > single tree (project unsplit) > > > > git-svn-id: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb-0310 > > -9956-ffa450edef68 > > > > commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b > > Author: Todd Lipcon > > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 > > > > Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > > > > commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d > > Author: Todd Lipcon > > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 > > > > Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ > > > > commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a > > Author: Todd Lipcon > > Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 > > > > Relocate common into common/ > > > > The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the > > pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track > > changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg > > --follow). For example: > > > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=oneline > --abbrev-commit > > --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | > head > > -10 > > 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ > > 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of > > JobTrackerStatus. > > ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to > > aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles > > 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated > options. > > Contributed by Ari Rabkin. > > > > If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the > > project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in > > hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: > > 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 > > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 > > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d > > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > > > In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For > > example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition > it > > to the new combined repo, I did the following: > > > > # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: > > git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ > > git fetch splithdfs > > > > # Checkout a branch in my combined repo > > git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 > > > > # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch > > git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 > > > > ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory > (I > > was surprised and impressed by this!) > > If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be > > smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch > inside > > of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. > For > > less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the > > patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to > rebase. > > Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. > > > > > > == Outstanding issues == > > > > The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds > should > > be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the > > combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a > > diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed > file > > names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this > is > > to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass > > "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: > > > > todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative > > --no-prefix > > diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt > > ... > > > > > > I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the > cracks. > > Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. > > > > -Todd > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to > go. > >> I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). > >> > >> ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that > this > >> should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it > might > >> stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things > are > >> ready to go on the new layout. > >> > >> I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling > them > >> one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this > evening. > >>> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press > the big > >>> button tomorrow. > >>> > >>> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at > around > >>> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to > please > >>> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Todd > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 > >>>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the > git > >>>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a > local > >>>> mirror of the svn. > >>>> > >>>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I > >>>> actually do the commit. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> -Todd > >>>> -- > >>>> Todd Lipcon > >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Todd Lipcon > >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Todd Lipcon > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d78479d53ade04a5995fc9-- From general-return-3674-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:36:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5E43666A for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70346 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:36:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70304 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70296 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:36:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:36:22 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.32.222.113] (166-205-139-215.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.139.215]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LMQ00HVEJBXC350@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-06-13_04:2011-06-13,2011-06-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1106130085 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend References: From: Nigel Daley X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) In-reply-to: Message-id: <4D158B60-98CF-4BF2-B43A-724B4509596B@mac.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:35:52 -0700 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, many thanks for carrying this over the finish line! Cheers, Nige Sent from my iPhone4 On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > Nice work Todd. Thank you for making this happen! > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> OK, this seems to have succeeded without any big problems! >> >> I've re-enabled the git mirrors and the hudson builds. Feel free to commit >> to the new trees. >> >> Here are some instructions for the migration: >> >> === SVN users === >> >> Next time you "svn up" in your "common" working directory you'll end up >> seeing the combined tree - ie a mapreduce/, hdfs/, and common/ subdirectory. >> This is probably the easiest place from which to work, now. The URLs for the >> combined SVN trees are: >> >> trunk: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ >> branch-0.22: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 >> branch-0.21: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21 >> yahoo-merge: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge >> (this one has the yahoo-merge branches from common, hdfs, and mapred) >> MR-279: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 >> (this one has the yahoo-merge common and hdfs, and the MR-279 mapred) >> >> The same kind of thing happened for HDFS-1073 and branch-0.21-old. >> Pre-project-split branches like branch-0.20 should have remained untouched. >> >> You can proceed to delete your checkouts of the individual mapred and hdfs >> trees, since they exist within the combined trees above. If for some reason >> you prefer to 'svn switch' an old MR or HDFS-specific checkout to point to >> its new location, you can use the following incantation: >> svn sw $(svn info | grep URL | awk '{print $2}' | sed >> 's,\(hdfs\|mapreduce\|common\)/\(.*\),common/\2/\1,') >> >> === Git Users === >> The git mirrors of the above 7 branches should now have a set of 4 commits >> near the top that look like this: >> >> Merge: 928d485 cd66945 77f628f >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:28 2011 +0000 >> >> HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a >> single tree (project unsplit) >> >> git-svn-id: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk@113499413f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >> >> commit 77f628ff5925c25ba2ee4ce14590789eb2e7b85b >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:27 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> >> commit cd66945f62635f589ff93468e94c0039684a8b6d >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:26 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate hdfs into hdfs/ >> >> commit 928d485e2743115fe37f9d123ce9a635c5afb91a >> Author: Todd Lipcon >> Date: Sun Jun 12 22:53:25 2011 +0000 >> >> Relocate common into common/ >> >> The first of these 4 is a 3-parent "octopus" merge commit of the >> pre-project-unsplit branches. In theory, git is smart enough to track >> changes through this merge, so long as you pass the right flags (eg >> --follow). For example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit >> --follow mapreduce/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobTracker.java | head >> -10 >> 77f628f Relocate mapreduce into mapreduce/ >> 90df0cb MAPREDUCE-2455. Remove deprecated JobTracker.State in favour of >> JobTrackerStatus. >> ca2aba0 MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to >> aid diagnosis of related issues. Contributed by Jonathan Eagles >> 32aaa2a MAPREDUCE-2515. MapReduce code references some deprecated options. >> Contributed by Ari Rabkin. >> >> If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the >> project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in >> hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: >> 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d >> 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c >> >> In terms of rebasing git branches, git is actually pretty smart. For >> example, I have a local "HDFS-1073" branch in my hdfs repo. To transition it >> to the new combined repo, I did the following: >> >> # Add my project-split hdfs git repo as a remote: >> git remote add splithdfs /home/todd/git/hadoop-hdfs/ >> git fetch splithdfs >> >> # Checkout a branch in my combined repo >> git checkout -b HDFS-1073 splithdfs/HDFS-1073 >> >> # Rebase it on the combined 1073 branch >> git rebase origin/HDFS-1073 >> >> ...and it actually applies my patches inside the appropriate subdirectory (I >> was surprised and impressed by this!) >> If the branch you're rebasing has added or moved files, it might not be >> smart enough and you'll have to manually rename them in your branch inside >> of the appropriate subtree.. but for simple patches this seems to work. For >> less simple things, the best bet may be to use "git filter-branch" on the >> patch series to relocate it inside a subdirectory, and then try to rebase. >> Let me know if you need a hand with any git cleanup, happy to help. >> >> >> == Outstanding issues == >> >> The one outstanding issue I'm aware of is that the test-patch builds should >> be smart enough to be able to deal with patches that are relative to the >> combined root instead of the original project. Right now, if you export a >> diff from git, it will include "hdfs/" or "mapreduce/" in the changed file >> names, and the QA bot won't know how to apply it. The workaround for this is >> to change directory into the relative subproject dir, and then pass >> "--relative" to "git diff" or "git show", for example: >> >> todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/mapreduce$ git diff --relative >> --no-prefix >> diff --git CHANGES.txt CHANGES.txt >> ... >> >> >> I imagine there are probably some other things that fell through the cracks. >> Please get in touch if there's anything that seems amiss. >> >> -Todd >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> All of the nits I ran into should be resolved and we should be good to go. >>> I will start this in just about 10 minutes (3pm PST). >>> >>> ***Please hold all commits until further notice!*** I anticipate that this >>> should take under an hour, but if there are any bumps along the way it might >>> stretch into the evening. I'll send out an "all clear" email when things are >>> ready to go on the new layout. >>> >>> I've disabled all of the Hudson builds for now and will be re-enabling them >>> one by one after reconfiguring their SVN URLs. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm figuring out one more small nit I noticed in my testing this evening. >>>> Hopefully I will figure out what's going wrong and be ready to press the big >>>> button tomorrow. >>>> >>>> Assuming I don't have to "abort mission", my hope is to do this at around >>>> 3PM PST tomorrow (Sunday). I'll send out a message asking folks to please >>>> hold commits to all branches while the move is in progress. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Todd >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Pending any unforeseen issues, I am planning on committing HADOOP-7106 >>>>> this weekend. I have the credentials from Jukka to take care of the git >>>>> trees as well, and have done a "practice" move several times on a local >>>>> mirror of the svn. >>>>> >>>>> I'll send out an announcement of the exact time in advance of when I >>>>> actually do the commit. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Todd >>>>> -- >>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> From general-return-3675-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 16:04:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9C2B6DF7 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41040 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:04:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40969 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40957 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 16:04:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:04:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:04:37 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4462531bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.61.197 with SMTP id u5mr2879915bkh.210.1307981056351; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:04:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:03:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a9d03c9fd604a59a12b1 --001636c5a9d03c9fd604a59a12b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Oops, sorry about that one. I will take care of that in about 30 minutes > (just headed out the door now to catch a train). If someone else with commit > access wants to, you just need to propset the externals to point to th new > common/trunk/common/src/test/bin instead of the old location. > > Fixed the svn:externals > >> Also, the ant eclipse targets seem to be broken now. It seems like >> various >> parts of the eclipse target need to be commonized now (the >> .eclipse-templates stuff and .classpath, .launches, etc.) >> >> > Will look into this as well. > > Can you explain further what's broken? Are you trying to make a project that's rooted in the directory that contains common/, mapreduce/, and hdfs/? I can imagine that wouldn't work, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't work to continue having three separate projects. Are you using some kind of SVN integration with Eclipse? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c5a9d03c9fd604a59a12b1-- From general-return-3676-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 16:25:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1D3D69C3 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91997 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:25:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91940 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:25:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91932 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 16:25:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:25:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:25:23 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DGOdX2026059 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:24:39 -0700 From: Jeffrey Naisbitt To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:24:38 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: Acwp46325uX3cxbWRWG79YHTeQ0sAgAArXNp Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/13/11 11:03 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Fixed the svn:externals Thanks! :) >>=20 >>> Also, the ant eclipse targets seem to be broken now. It seems like >>> various >>> parts of the eclipse target need to be commonized now (the >>> .eclipse-templates stuff and .classpath, .launches, etc.) >>>=20 >>>=20 >> Will look into this as well. >>=20 >> Can you explain further what's broken? Are you trying to make a project > that's rooted in the directory that contains common/, mapreduce/, and hdf= s/? > I can imagine that wouldn't work, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't work t= o > continue having three separate projects. Are you using some kind of SVN > integration with Eclipse? >>> Also, the ant eclipse targets seem to be broken now. It seems like >>> various >>> parts of the eclipse target need to be commonized now (the >>> .eclipse-templates stuff and .classpath, .launches, etc.) >>>=20 >>>=20 >> Will look into this as well. >>=20 >> Can you explain further what's broken? Are you trying to make a project > that's rooted in the directory that contains common/, mapreduce/, and hdf= s/? > I can imagine that wouldn't work, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't work t= o > continue having three separate projects. Are you using some kind of SVN > integration with Eclipse? I am using subversive for svn integration. I was actually trying to use a single project for the whole thing (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk) As you say though, I would think it should still work with three separate projects, so I'll just go back to that for now. It would be nice to be abl= e to build the whole thing as a single project though (since it's a single repository in svn now), but that would probably take some extra work - and would probably make sense in a separate Jira. Thanks. -Jeff From general-return-3677-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 16:51:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B02596A4A for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62105 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62052 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62044 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 16:51:23 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:51:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:51:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:51:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Tom White wrote: >=20 > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? Thanks for doing the search Tom. Rather than just flip them all to public, I'd like to propose the = following: a) LimitedPrivate APIs to non-Hadoop projects are allowed to exist for 1 = minor release. b) When a LimitedPrivate to non-Hadoop project is created, a blocker = JIRA for the next release is created. c) That JIRA should be used to determine whether the API should go = private or public, and if the latter, what interface changes are = required. This gives us a roadmap to make determinations on whether the = LimitedPrivate API was a success or not and gives us a timeline as to = when they go away, rather than just hanging around forever in a limbo = state. I suspect that most of these will go public anyway, but it would be good = to have some documentation on the how's, why's, etc. This could also be = used to allay the fears of a "bad" public interface.= From general-return-3678-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:02:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FC3C6932 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78560 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78319 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78311 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:02:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:02:25 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4553653bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.71.193 with SMTP id i1mr5074107bkj.102.1307984524177; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:02:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:01:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:01:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b6c9ef734c04a59ae0de --001636c5b6c9ef734c04a59ae0de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt wrote: > As you say though, I would think it should still work with three separate > projects, so I'll just go back to that for now. It would be nice to be > able > to build the whole thing as a single project though (since it's a single > repository in svn now), but that would probably take some extra work - and > would probably make sense in a separate Jira. > Yep - I think the idea is this will happen once we mavenize everything. Maven apparently supports the idea of "modules" - basically a recursive structure in which a top level pom file can build sub-poms, but the subpoms could also continue to be built independently if necessary. I think the top-level pom would live in the new root. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c5b6c9ef734c04a59ae0de-- From general-return-3679-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:05:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAFB863C6 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83173 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83126 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83118 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:05:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tucu@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:05:26 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so3014702pzk.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.63.10 with SMTP id q10mr869739wfk.291.1307984706053; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:05:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.83.16 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:04:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:04:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173ffa7cc6a80504a59aebf6 --0015173ffa7cc6a80504a59aebf6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt >wrote: > > > As you say though, I would think it should still work with three separate > > projects, so I'll just go back to that for now. It would be nice to be > > able > > to build the whole thing as a single project though (since it's a single > > repository in svn now), but that would probably take some extra work - > and > > would probably make sense in a separate Jira. > > > > Yep - I think the idea is this will happen once we mavenize everything. > Maven apparently supports the idea of "modules" - basically a recursive > structure in which a top level pom file can build sub-poms, but the subpoms > could also continue to be built independently if necessary. I think the > top-level pom would live in the new root. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > That sounds just right! Thxs. Alejandro --0015173ffa7cc6a80504a59aebf6-- From general-return-3680-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:09:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5956866AE for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97997 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:09:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97952 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97944 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:09:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:09:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:09:38 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DH90wE067459 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:08:59 -0700 From: Jeffrey Naisbitt To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:08:58 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: Acwp67qow1N5lwaxSHmgr5zz32CIZwAANqZ7 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/13/11 12:01 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt > wrote: >=20 >> As you say though, I would think it should still work with three separat= e >> projects, so I'll just go back to that for now. It would be nice to be >> able >> to build the whole thing as a single project though (since it's a single >> repository in svn now), but that would probably take some extra work - a= nd >> would probably make sense in a separate Jira. >>=20 >=20 > Yep - I think the idea is this will happen once we mavenize everything. > Maven apparently supports the idea of "modules" - basically a recursive > structure in which a top level pom file can build sub-poms, but the subpo= ms > could also continue to be built independently if necessary. I think the > top-level pom would live in the new root. >=20 > -Todd I look forward to the mavenization! :) I verified the eclipse builds are working fine for me in separate projects and that the svn:externals work fine on yahoo-merge now. Thanks for the quick responses and for all the other work on the "unsplit"! -Jeff From general-return-3681-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:11:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C245E677C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1219 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:11:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1136 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:11:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:11:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:11:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.16] (HELO qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:10:54 +0000 Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vUdF1g00A0mlR8UA1VAYaZ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:10:32 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vVAZ1g00J3QAh8g8XVAaRP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:10:35 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5DHAVjg031665 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:10:31 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5DHAUg1031664 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:10:30 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:10:30 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Message-ID: <20110613171030.GA31569@linspire.com> References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:51AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Tom White wrote: > > > > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? > > > Thanks for doing the search Tom. > > Rather than just flip them all to public, I'd like to propose the following: > > a) LimitedPrivate APIs to non-Hadoop projects are allowed to exist for 1 minor release. > b) When a LimitedPrivate to non-Hadoop project is created, a blocker JIRA for the next release is created. > c) That JIRA should be used to determine whether the API should go private > or public, and if the latter, what interface changes are required. Allen, the idea looks reasonable yet an over-complicated for the dev. process. It seems rather better to stick with original Tom's proposal: e.g. eliminate LimitedPrivate and use just Private instead: lesser interfaces to track/decisions to make, more transparent the process will be, IMO. > This gives us a roadmap to make determinations on whether the LimitedPrivate > API was a success or not and gives us a timeline as to when they go away, > rather than just hanging around forever in a limbo state. > > I suspect that most of these will go public anyway, but it would be good to > have some documentation on the how's, why's, etc. This could also be used > to allay the fears of a "bad" public interface. From general-return-3682-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:29:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18B5B6490 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39914 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:29:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39837 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:29:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39829 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:29:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:29:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:28:52 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4682756bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.233.15 with SMTP id jw15mr4928172bkb.48.1307989712165; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:28:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: JIRAs post-"unsplit" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3979db4629da0b04a59c1665 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b3979db4629da0b04a59c1665 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 After the "project unsplit" this weekend, we're now back to a place where we have a single SVN/git tree that encompasses all of the subprojects. This opens up the next question: should we merge the JIRAs and allow a single issue to have a patch which spans projects? My thoughts are: - the biggest pain point with the project split is dealing with cross-project patches - one of the biggest reasons we did the project split was that the combined traffic from the HADOOP JIRA was hard to follow for people who really care about certain subprojects. - the jira split is a coarse-grained way of allowing people to watch just the sub-areas they care about. So, I was thinking the following... what if there were a way to watch JIRAs based on subtrees? I'm imagining a web page where any community user could have an account and manage a "watch list" of subtrees. If you want to watch all MR jiras, you could simply watch mapreduce/*. If you care only about libhdfs, you could watch hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, etc. Then a bot would watch all patches attached to JIRA, and any time a patch is uploaded that touches something on your watch list, it automatically adds you as a watcher on the ticket and sends you a notification via email. It would also be easy to set up a watch based on patch size, for example. I think even if we don't recombine the JIRAs, this might be a handy way to cut down on mailing list traffic for contributors who have a more narrow focus on certain areas of the code. Does this sound useful? I don't know if/when I'd have time to build such a thing, but if the community thinks it would be really helpful, I might become inspired. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --485b3979db4629da0b04a59c1665-- From general-return-3683-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:42:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A89696C7F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64565 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64462 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64454 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:42:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.230] (HELO nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:42:43 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.191] by nm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2011 18:42:20 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.148] by tm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2011 18:42:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2011 18:42:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 658667.55828.bm@omp1031.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53102 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2011 18:42:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1307990540; bh=BeaCJmwBbMfnV26Ht6B4SBbYvGnmXyqSKwQ8LHDy0qM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1WoMkaa2iaWYmEBDkr9RW9Ry2YJZDk47ZiZCGAKu/GhNLWfb5jivNtikgp5/8zlHopoJWvSv8ETf6jf+NTmZ4nMFe0ttW2HrNXr0LLcf+k5AuFY0O1TJwGaB61LqWQwEl7ywD4NOzmOF7Nahc3DibpXEFsTqPTspBn0etmSlbEk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BXyhiPv9sHNZIc6R/fDXffS+Oi85RkcLu58rhxblkSAlk94ynPr8dlt9QRFsdzNzVMZMqzzU3YhA5/Y+7BOhnnGMTWlPHN8HAcBJshdyjPglVsoiyEtxI3eng3YwJZbzm8mNR1eWb+eq3/k/Rk7anbwgKqK/9dS/UQQOfFSXGNw=; Message-ID: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: wToyzyQVM1kzpnw3nh07Nsjkox54g0ptieI5_8APTAxbqRv g4w1B9AHbBBbqADlvurF5RaVShrseyf26GtfzICduE.0jyeD7xLtMU.HiBM6 8PTTn5XRJAG7k6Rx8taPlapHwu7krQu_syaxUZGDSTKPbfcAz8asFfX1oLNX PjvDYpGomLAiJRD0Ja0zPCE8uC5FyvQCLgOFc6XNCImOjfVs.zHtC1ov2g7f qJJNcV5j8uQ0QsKx_2ajO41lmf_vvpxIILxs88baR2g7tQcCa2ou9rXaBMVg CJzkKhoShhFanzrDMkYvi5Sc8tPOaeUjXAcyiNg43ywehAxKJ0PmoZSTCuny vKUUkBalDcTbSrWVClnN0dOoIqenb1K33XlNTI__nDnchmObRTCgplq_dk6X 2kzVL5w3j.oB7twUu82BAcV801Der55VZmA-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:42:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:42:20 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-816861540-1307990540=:48430" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-816861540-1307990540=:48430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Todd, Great work! A few minor problems: (1) I had committed MAPREDUCE-2588, however, an commit email was sent to both common-commits@ and mapreduce-commits@. (2) hadoop/site becomes an empty directory. (3) There are svn properties in hadoop/common/trunk/ (2) and (3) are simple. I will remove hadoop/site and the svn properties for hadoop/common/trunk/. Does anyone know how to fix (1)? A separated question: Strictly speaking, this is not "project unsplit" since we are going to submit patches for individual sub-projects as before, i.e. we keep generating and committing patches to common/trunk/[common/hdfs/mapreduce] but not common/trunk; hudson will pick up patches from individual sub-projects, etc. Am I correct? Just want to make sure that everyone is on the same page. :) Regards, Tsz-Wo --0-816861540-1307990540=:48430-- From general-return-3684-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:52:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C515672B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87582 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:52:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87517 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87509 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:52:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:52:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.228] (HELO qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:52:08 +0000 Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vWPD1g0041eYJf8AFWrmU0; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:51:46 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vWrm1g0083QAh8g01WrmSb; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:51:47 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5DIpihL032068 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:51:44 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5DIpiGx032067 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:51:44 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:51:44 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" Message-ID: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA projects for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in the same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is needed then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the scope somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. NameNode) I will still get the notification? Cos On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:28AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > After the "project unsplit" this weekend, we're now back to a place where we > have a single SVN/git tree that encompasses all of the subprojects. This > opens up the next question: should we merge the JIRAs and allow a single > issue to have a patch which spans projects? > > My thoughts are: > - the biggest pain point with the project split is dealing with > cross-project patches > - one of the biggest reasons we did the project split was that the combined > traffic from the HADOOP JIRA was hard to follow for people who really care > about certain subprojects. > - the jira split is a coarse-grained way of allowing people to watch just > the sub-areas they care about. > > So, I was thinking the following... what if there were a way to watch JIRAs > based on subtrees? I'm imagining a web page where any community user could > have an account and manage a "watch list" of subtrees. If you want to watch > all MR jiras, you could simply watch mapreduce/*. If you care only about > libhdfs, you could watch hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, etc. Then a bot would watch > all patches attached to JIRA, and any time a patch is uploaded that touches > something on your watch list, it automatically adds you as a watcher on the > ticket and sends you a notification via email. It would also be easy to set > up a watch based on patch size, for example. > > I think even if we don't recombine the JIRAs, this might be a handy way to > cut down on mailing list traffic for contributors who have a more narrow > focus on certain areas of the code. > > Does this sound useful? I don't know if/when I'd have time to build such a > thing, but if the community thinks it would be really helpful, I might > become inspired. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3685-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 19:52:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D4B16860 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17575 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 19:52:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17519 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 19:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17509 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 19:52:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:52:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:52:15 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DJpjin017796 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:51:45 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:51:44 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend Thread-Index: AcwqA1LS/t67qfo0Rnq8qP2Va7TSjQ== Message-ID: <77E52CF7-D482-42F7-A871-677E2D29A5AE@yahoo-inc.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd, it's so great to have this done. Thanks for the huge amount of hard = work! --Matt On Jun 13, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt wrote: On 6/13/11 12:01 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jeffrey Naisbitt > wrote: >=20 >> As you say though, I would think it should still work with three separat= e >> projects, so I'll just go back to that for now. It would be nice to be >> able >> to build the whole thing as a single project though (since it's a single >> repository in svn now), but that would probably take some extra work - a= nd >> would probably make sense in a separate Jira. >>=20 >=20 > Yep - I think the idea is this will happen once we mavenize everything. > Maven apparently supports the idea of "modules" - basically a recursive > structure in which a top level pom file can build sub-poms, but the subpo= ms > could also continue to be built independently if necessary. I think the > top-level pom would live in the new root. >=20 > -Todd I look forward to the mavenization! :) I verified the eclipse builds are working fine for me in separate projects and that the svn:externals work fine on yahoo-merge now. Thanks for the quick responses and for all the other work on the "unsplit"! -Jeff From general-return-3686-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 20:36:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FA336A23 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91879 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91823 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91815 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 20:36:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:36:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:36:12 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4873978bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.71.193 with SMTP id i1mr5275622bkj.102.1307997352171; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b6c98b19c104a59ddda8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b6c98b19c104a59ddda8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze < s29752-hadoopgeneral@yahoo.com> wrote: > Todd, > > Great work! > > > A few minor problems: > (1) I had committed MAPREDUCE-2588, however, an commit email was sent to > both > common-commits@ and mapreduce-commits@. > (2) hadoop/site becomes an empty directory. > (3) There are svn properties in hadoop/common/trunk/ > > (2) and (3) are simple. I will remove hadoop/site and the svn properties > for > hadoop/common/trunk/. > > Does anyone know how to fix (1)? > Ah, we need to update the mailer config. This is the remaining task I mentioned on the HADOOP-7106 JIRA. We had updated it to include both the old and new spots for the sake of the transition. I'll ping Ian about this - I think he's the only one with access. > > > A separated question: > Strictly speaking, this is not "project unsplit" since we are going to > submit > patches for individual sub-projects as before, i.e. we keep generating and > committing patches to common/trunk/[common/hdfs/mapreduce] but not > common/trunk; hudson will pick up patches from individual sub-projects, > etc. > Am I correct? Just want to make sure that everyone is on the same page. > :) > > Correct, that's where we at for today. I opened HADOOP-7384 which will allow patches generated against the "full repo" to apply to an individual project, to make life easier for git users, but right now we still need separate JIRAs and patches. See my other thread from this morning about some ideas how we might be able to do cross-project patches in a reasonable way. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c5b6c98b19c104a59ddda8-- From general-return-3687-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 20:41:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A12966D96 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5656 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:41:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5593 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:41:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5579 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 20:41:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:41:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:41:45 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4881868bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.189.209 with SMTP id df17mr5187786bkb.75.1307997684086; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:37:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dd4e353b73a04a59df1f2 --485b397dd4e353b73a04a59df1f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. > > I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA > projects > for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in > the > same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is > needed > then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. > Yea, perhaps we just need the QA bot to be smart enough that it could handle a cross-project patch attached to HADOOP? Maybe we do something crazy and make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? (just brainstorming here...) > Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the > scope > somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say > hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, > but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. NameNode) > I > will still get the notification? > Right, that's the idea. You'd be added as a watcher (and get notified) for any patch that touches the area you care about, regardless of whether it also touches some other areas. -Todd On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:28AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > After the "project unsplit" this weekend, we're now back to a place where > we > > have a single SVN/git tree that encompasses all of the subprojects. This > > opens up the next question: should we merge the JIRAs and allow a single > > issue to have a patch which spans projects? > > > > My thoughts are: > > - the biggest pain point with the project split is dealing with > > cross-project patches > > - one of the biggest reasons we did the project split was that the > combined > > traffic from the HADOOP JIRA was hard to follow for people who really > care > > about certain subprojects. > > - the jira split is a coarse-grained way of allowing people to watch just > > the sub-areas they care about. > > > > So, I was thinking the following... what if there were a way to watch > JIRAs > > based on subtrees? I'm imagining a web page where any community user > could > > have an account and manage a "watch list" of subtrees. If you want to > watch > > all MR jiras, you could simply watch mapreduce/*. If you care only about > > libhdfs, you could watch hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, etc. Then a bot would > watch > > all patches attached to JIRA, and any time a patch is uploaded that > touches > > something on your watch list, it automatically adds you as a watcher on > the > > ticket and sends you a notification via email. It would also be easy to > set > > up a watch based on patch size, for example. > > > > I think even if we don't recombine the JIRAs, this might be a handy way > to > > cut down on mailing list traffic for contributors who have a more narrow > > focus on certain areas of the code. > > > > Does this sound useful? I don't know if/when I'd have time to build such > a > > thing, but if the community thinks it would be really helpful, I might > > become inspired. > > > > -Todd > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --485b397dd4e353b73a04a59df1f2-- From general-return-3688-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 20:55:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2337B64CD for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25432 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:55:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25346 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 20:55:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25338 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 20:55:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:55:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:55:00 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4898138bwz.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.189.209 with SMTP id df17mr5199027bkb.75.1307998478428; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:52:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dd4e3ac6b8004a59e20df --485b397dd4e3ac6b8004a59e20df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > If you want to be able to have git follow renames all the way through the > project split back to the beginning of time, put the following in > hadoop-common/.git/info/grafts: > 5128a9a453d64bfe1ed978cf9ffed27985eeef36 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 6a3ac690e493c7da45bbf2ae2054768c427fd0e1 > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > 546d96754ffee3142bcbbf4563c624c053d0ed0d > 6c16dc8cf2b28818c852e95302920a278d07ad0c > > ATM has pointed out that the above contents line-wrapped in some people's email inboxes. I've put the correct information on the GitAndHadoop wiki page here: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/GitAndHadoop -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --485b397dd4e3ac6b8004a59e20df-- From general-return-3689-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:06:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 030E860DD for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54660 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:06:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54614 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54606 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:06:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:06:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:06:03 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so3010335yxd.35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1/7tEtLMubyvXq+bDHW9ByFVz0X1rrGoxEvpum9ykGk=; b=FdsX79x6pXAFvX4nlwTZmEc/YgbSCdzcFLthoYAIn1Dl+jC5lM5ffa2A/eiKflsG+0 Q3E+zypSHaCAwOCIdd5rdLaZckTaTQceMBaf6xn8P1FHktOvBbxc9FxxEZYQoU7ASBm3 Nwex/Ry5Yw5Xmu06D89mNZnVRl5tq+LQZ/dZs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=c+F5Gvwd0UX7Kq9zBEryfbk0WGIUS82SGtZuZZh0VwyUqIsjAH6U/xcntZomNDNXPq 2AoaEDL6aZHNxqubwkVH3nUqi9DP0ze4ZV2Oci7lG3eMkMfjcPwmdW3w846Y5cd83pCj ri24hKKs/dmGumR9kz6r2onmuOS4mBr+J/SlM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.43.50 with SMTP id k38mr3146627yhb.186.1307999141576; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vicaya@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.1 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:05:41 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iPKgNNT6LXbhB5oWoaZ8nyMh0Ng Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" From: Luke Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Maybe we do something crazy and make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? (just > brainstorming here...) Sounds like a good idea. Having separate JIRA components for common, hdfs and mapreduce is a way to assert code locality. Having a HADOOPX jira component make the cross-componentness explicit (and making CI easier), which is a good thing, IMO. __Luke From general-return-3690-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:03:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6527E67B2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70380 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:03:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70326 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:03:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70318 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:03:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:03:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:03:46 +0000 Received: from [172.16.106.57] (vpn-dc-nat.crs4.it [156.148.160.116]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA52790102 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DF696F3.4010609@crs4.it> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:11 +0200 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: docs on setting up security? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everyone, is there any documentation on configuring kerberos security for Hadoop 0.20.203.0? The current documentation still refers to this feature as a "future improvement". I remember seeing a guide on this on the Yahoo! dev network before Yahoo!'s distribution was discontinued, but it looks like it's not accessible anymore. Thanks in advance Simone -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-3691-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:04:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 432B2694F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72079 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:04:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72024 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72016 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:04:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:04:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:04:05 +0000 Received: from [172.16.106.57] (vpn-dc-nat.crs4.it [156.148.160.116]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D75790106 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:03:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DF69706.6000702@crs4.it> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:02:30 +0200 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: docs on setting up security? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everyone, is there any documentation on configuring kerberos security for Hadoop 0.20.203.0? The current documentation still refers to this feature as a "future improvement". I remember seeing a guide on this on the Yahoo! dev network before Yahoo!'s distribution was discontinued, but it looks like it's not accessible anymore. Thanks in advance Simone -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-3692-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:12:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 921386E7D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86188 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86115 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86107 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:12:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:12:07 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5DMBWFs065974 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308003092; bh=rchLnEYjMzn+kVc9f7NMeUEqeXXkPRlWWo5mL9IXU1Y=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=hFPAeHTGMBN59XWhZV1EjxqZ2DMh3sINCs+vldVHUVRsm18crATUOlJC1KeB6iaJ8 9aANvxZpsj9I8gqi0kpdaWQKNjLwvviNZZieyYrtUYrDNESa1TecqaS+3pU1Cqic7d kxIMpQHOhZ0xSan7fkKeA/HQVr8YBRU+0ROfGv/4= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:11:32 -0700 From: Kihwal Lee To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:11:30 -0700 Subject: Re: docs on setting up security? Thread-Topic: docs on setting up security? Thread-Index: AcwqFems0bN5SL+wT9e8zljhp1H4UwAAO8Hq Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DF69706.6000702@crs4.it> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA1BF5427120kihwalyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CA1BF5427120kihwalyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Take a look at these: http://yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common/installing.html https://ccp.cloudera.com/display/CDHDOC/CDH3+Security+Guide Kihwal On 6/13/11 6:02 PM, "Simone Leo" wrote: Hello everyone, is there any documentation on configuring kerberos security for Hadoop 0.20.203.0? The current documentation still refers to this feature as a "future improvement". I remember seeing a guide on this on the Yahoo! dev network before Yahoo!'s distribution was discontinued, but it looks like it's not accessible anymore. Thanks in advance Simone -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it --_000_CA1BF5427120kihwalyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3693-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:55:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D8DB6BF2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31312 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:55:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31260 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:55:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31252 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:55:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:55:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.32] (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:54:54 +0000 Received: from omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vbBn1g0051GXsucA3buYPt; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:54:32 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vbuU1g00J3QAh8g8UbuZNZ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:54:36 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5DNsOQB000674 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:24 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5DNsN8i000673 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:23 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:23 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" Message-ID: <20110613235423.GA636@linspire.com> References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:37PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. > > > > I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA > > projects > > for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in > > the > > same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is > > needed > > then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. > > > > Yea, perhaps we just need the QA bot to be smart enough that it could handle > a cross-project patch attached to HADOOP? Maybe we do something crazy and > make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? (just > brainstorming here...) Correct me if I'm wrong but in the new structure cross-component patch differs from a component one by a patch level (i.e. p0 vs p1 if looked from common/trunk), right? I guess the bot can be hacked to use this distinction thus saving us an extra JIRA project which will merely serve the purpose of meta-project. cos > > Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the > > scope > > somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say > > hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, > > but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. NameNode) > > I > > will still get the notification? > > > > Right, that's the idea. You'd be added as a watcher (and get notified) for > any patch that touches the area you care about, regardless of whether it > also touches some other areas. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:28AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > After the "project unsplit" this weekend, we're now back to a place where > > we > > > have a single SVN/git tree that encompasses all of the subprojects. This > > > opens up the next question: should we merge the JIRAs and allow a single > > > issue to have a patch which spans projects? > > > > > > My thoughts are: > > > - the biggest pain point with the project split is dealing with > > > cross-project patches > > > - one of the biggest reasons we did the project split was that the > > combined > > > traffic from the HADOOP JIRA was hard to follow for people who really > > care > > > about certain subprojects. > > > - the jira split is a coarse-grained way of allowing people to watch just > > > the sub-areas they care about. > > > > > > So, I was thinking the following... what if there were a way to watch > > JIRAs > > > based on subtrees? I'm imagining a web page where any community user > > could > > > have an account and manage a "watch list" of subtrees. If you want to > > watch > > > all MR jiras, you could simply watch mapreduce/*. If you care only about > > > libhdfs, you could watch hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, etc. Then a bot would > > watch > > > all patches attached to JIRA, and any time a patch is uploaded that > > touches > > > something on your watch list, it automatically adds you as a watcher on > > the > > > ticket and sends you a notification via email. It would also be easy to > > set > > > up a watch based on patch size, for example. > > > > > > I think even if we don't recombine the JIRAs, this might be a handy way > > to > > > cut down on mailing list traffic for contributors who have a more narrow > > > focus on certain areas of the code. > > > > > > Does this sound useful? I don't know if/when I'd have time to build such > > a > > > thing, but if the community thinks it would be really helpful, I might > > > become inspired. > > > > > > -Todd > > > -- > > > Todd Lipcon > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3694-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:38:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 304736D63 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39856 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39797 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39789 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:38:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:38:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.51] (HELO mail-fx0-f51.google.com) (209.85.161.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:38:44 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so3621821fxm.38 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.161.194 with SMTP id s2mr512034fax.143.1308015504167; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:38:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:38:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110613235423.GA636@linspire.com> References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> <20110613235423.GA636@linspire.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:38:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545309787c951904a5a2170d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023545309787c951904a5a2170d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:37PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > > > I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. > > > > > > I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA > > > projects > > > for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches > in > > > the > > > same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is > > > needed > > > then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. > > > > > > > Yea, perhaps we just need the QA bot to be smart enough that it could > handle > > a cross-project patch attached to HADOOP? Maybe we do something crazy and > > make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? > (just > > brainstorming here...) > > Correct me if I'm wrong but in the new structure cross-component patch > differs > from a component one by a patch level (i.e. p0 vs p1 if looked from > common/trunk), right? I guess the bot can be hacked to use this distinction > thus saving us an extra JIRA project which will merely serve the purpose of > meta-project. > > Yes, I am about to commit HADOOP-7384 which can at least deal with patches relative to either trunk/ or trunk/. But, it will also detect a cross-project patch and barf. It could certainly be extended to apply and test a cross-project patch, though it would be substantially more work. The advantage of a separate HADOOPX jira would be to allow people to notice cross-project patches. For example, a dev who primarily works on HDFS may not subscribe to mapreduce-dev or mapreduce-issues, but if an MR issue is going to modify something in the HDFS codebase, he or she will certainly want to be aware of it. -Todd > > > Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the > > > scope > > > somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say > > > hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, > > > but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. > NameNode) > > > I > > > will still get the notification? > > > > > > > Right, that's the idea. You'd be added as a watcher (and get notified) > for > > any patch that touches the area you care about, regardless of whether it > > also touches some other areas. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:28AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > > After the "project unsplit" this weekend, we're now back to a place > where > > > we > > > > have a single SVN/git tree that encompasses all of the subprojects. > This > > > > opens up the next question: should we merge the JIRAs and allow a > single > > > > issue to have a patch which spans projects? > > > > > > > > My thoughts are: > > > > - the biggest pain point with the project split is dealing with > > > > cross-project patches > > > > - one of the biggest reasons we did the project split was that the > > > combined > > > > traffic from the HADOOP JIRA was hard to follow for people who really > > > care > > > > about certain subprojects. > > > > - the jira split is a coarse-grained way of allowing people to watch > just > > > > the sub-areas they care about. > > > > > > > > So, I was thinking the following... what if there were a way to watch > > > JIRAs > > > > based on subtrees? I'm imagining a web page where any community user > > > could > > > > have an account and manage a "watch list" of subtrees. If you want to > > > watch > > > > all MR jiras, you could simply watch mapreduce/*. If you care only > about > > > > libhdfs, you could watch hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, etc. Then a bot would > > > watch > > > > all patches attached to JIRA, and any time a patch is uploaded that > > > touches > > > > something on your watch list, it automatically adds you as a watcher > on > > > the > > > > ticket and sends you a notification via email. It would also be easy > to > > > set > > > > up a watch based on patch size, for example. > > > > > > > > I think even if we don't recombine the JIRAs, this might be a handy > way > > > to > > > > cut down on mailing list traffic for contributors who have a more > narrow > > > > focus on certain areas of the code. > > > > > > > > Does this sound useful? I don't know if/when I'd have time to build > such > > > a > > > > thing, but if the community thinks it would be really helpful, I > might > > > > become inspired. > > > > > > > > -Todd > > > > -- > > > > Todd Lipcon > > > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0023545309787c951904a5a2170d-- From general-return-3695-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:50:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 210C86415 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48001 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:50:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47939 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:50:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47931 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:50:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:50:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.51] (HELO mail-fx0-f51.google.com) (209.85.161.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:49:54 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so3635890fxm.38 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.127.210 with SMTP id h18mr633534fas.67.1308016174178; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:49:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:49:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545309706c22e604a5a23f12 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023545309706c22e604a5a23f12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze < s29752-hadoopgeneral@yahoo.com> wrote: > A few minor problems: > (1) I had committed MAPREDUCE-2588, however, an commit email was sent to > both > common-commits@ and mapreduce-commits@. > I put up a patch to fix this on HADOOP-7106. Unfortunately I think Doug and Ian are the only ones who can commit it, and they're both traveling at the moment. So we may have to endure dup emails for a day or two. Sorry for the mailbox noise -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0023545309706c22e604a5a23f12-- From general-return-3696-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 12:34:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 642546118 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64284 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 12:34:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64233 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 12:34:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64225 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 12:34:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:34:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:34:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31323B7DEA for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:34:09 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p79crocGQt1s for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:34:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FFB7DE9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:34:07 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308659634.31789@Xn0xCKdZYpTyN/dr9xnSvw Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5ECXsXw028108 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:33:54 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:33:53 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Bigtop Proposal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5ECXsXw028108 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build and testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to have coordinated releases. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BigtopProposal For this to work, it needs support from all the hadoop-related projects in the ASF, and, in an ideal world, integration with those bits from outside (JUnit, Jetty) as well as downstream code (Cascading, etc). What is key is that the projects it builds and tests will need to care about the test failure reports, because BigTop should not be applying any patches to private branches of the specific projects (the way Cloudera and Ubuntu have done with the Hadoop and Linux source trees, respectively). Some kind of synchronized release schedule would be nice too, but I view that as a feature creep once the basic set up "build and test everything" is done. This could also be the place to put the functional tests against live clusters, tests which could eventually become the definition of compatibility that we've discussed before. For these reasons -I think everyone in the Hadoop-* projects dev teams ought to get involved, initially in reviewing the proposal, then hopefully on the mailing lists. -It might make sense for the hadoop, pig, hive, hama, mahout, hbase &c committers to all have access to this, so that they can help evolve the packaging and functional tests. thoughts? -steve From general-return-3697-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 16:35:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E05AF6BC2 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71204 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 16:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71129 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 16:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71121 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 16:35:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:35:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jrottinghuis@ebay.com) Received: from [216.33.244.6] (HELO rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com) (216.33.244.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:35:39 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received: From:To:Date:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-EMS-Proccessed:X-EMS-STAMP:X-CFilter; b=WHALS379FQBjG1YAZemSTiCg08IwawkN7itjkqCoxLvHuSo/yMqXCH4s 57YB474cmx5aZdLQyPuJzqEOqs+UokD+Dkn45hCEMAxvqG81Dp7m2nSKX L30ETUB3Eq5Z1sB; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=jrottinghuis@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1308069339; x=1339605339; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vxz0eguL3rC9cfndMc3uFGJhWx/Pq+u82bQrMQ5C4FE=; b=TbHXA6ZyYyllAV9u05B5JPEXYFnck52pB17EI6QzfJDmlrenkvtmxKJP Y2YhNDknomzk6a+FJznNy9A4CPhxEpWNZ6OoSI0j7ebRQjr10wvXg8nyH A7llX5y5ICDsWMT; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,365,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="21052336" Received: from rhv-vtenf-002.corp.ebay.com (HELO RHV-MEXHT-001.corp.ebay.com) ([10.112.113.53]) by rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2011 09:35:15 -0700 Received: from RHV-MEXHT-004.corp.ebay.com (10.245.24.106) by RHV-MEXHT-001.corp.ebay.com (10.245.24.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:35:14 -0700 Received: from RHV-MEXMS-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.17.115]) by RHV-MEXHT-004.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.24.106]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:35:14 -0700 From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:35:13 -0700 Subject: RE: JIRAs post-"unsplit" Thread-Topic: JIRAs post-"unsplit" Thread-Index: AcwqClSfLGqatEuPRmW4gLM7GsChOgApY4c2 Message-ID: References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EMS-Proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== X-EMS-STAMP: GCOvcmsWGtwPjEQvCS4Oew== X-CFilter: Scanned X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Project un-split definitely simplifies things. Todd, if people add a watch based on patches, would they not miss notificti= ons for those entries in an earlier phase of their lifecycle? For example when issues are just reported, discussed and assigned, but no p= atch has been attached yet? A separate HADOOPX Jira project would eliminate such issues. It does raise another question though: What happens if an issue starts out = in one area, and then turns out to require changes in other areas? Would one then first create a HADOOP-x, a HDFS-y, or MAPREDUCE-z and then w= hen it turns out other components are involved a new HADOOPX- referring to = such earlier Jira? Cheers, Joep ________________________________________ From: Todd Lipcon [todd@cloudera.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote= : > I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. > > I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA > projects > for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in > the > same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is > needed > then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. > Yea, perhaps we just need the QA bot to be smart enough that it could handl= e a cross-project patch attached to HADOOP? Maybe we do something crazy and make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? (jus= t brainstorming here...) > Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the > scope > somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say > hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, > but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. NameNod= e) > I > will still get the notification? > Right, that's the idea. You'd be added as a watcher (and get notified) for any patch that touches the area you care about, regardless of whether it also touches some other areas. -Todd= From general-return-3698-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:00:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD4396A9D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13253 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:00:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12960 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:00:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12952 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:00:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:14 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so5110081bwz.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.61.197 with SMTP id u5mr3274732bkh.210.1308070794223; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:59:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:59:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110613185144.GA32026@linspire.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:59:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a9d007e3ef04a5aef76a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a9d007e3ef04a5aef76a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Rottinghuis, Joep wrote: > Project un-split definitely simplifies things. > > Todd, if people add a watch based on patches, would they not miss > notifictions for those entries in an earlier phase of their lifecycle? > For example when issues are just reported, discussed and assigned, but no > patch has been attached yet? > > Another thought that Alejandro just suggested offline is to use JIRA components rather than just the file paths. So, assuming there is a bot that watches the JIRA, it would be easy enough to allow you to permawatch a component (JIRA itself doesn't give this option). Then, assuming the patch is assigned the right components, it will be seen by people who care early on. If it's not given the right components, then it will be seen once you upload a patch. > A separate HADOOPX Jira project would eliminate such issues. > > It does raise another question though: What happens if an issue starts out > in one area, and then turns out to require changes in other areas? > Would one then first create a HADOOP-x, a HDFS-y, or MAPREDUCE-z and then > when it turns out other components are involved a new HADOOPX- referring to > such earlier Jira? > > Cheers, > > Joep > > ________________________________________ > From: Todd Lipcon [todd@cloudera.com] > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: JIRAs post-"unsplit" > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. > > > > I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA > > projects > > for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in > > the > > same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is > > needed > > then HADOOP project JIRA can be used for tracking, patches, etc. > > > > Yea, perhaps we just need the QA bot to be smart enough that it could > handle > a cross-project patch attached to HADOOP? Maybe we do something crazy and > make a new HADOOPCROSS jira for patches that affect multiple projects? > (just > brainstorming here...) > > > > Tree-based watch-list seems like a great idea, but won't it narrow the > > scope > > somehow? Are you saying that if I am interested in say > > hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs, > > but a JIRA is open which affects libhdfs and something else (e.g. > NameNode) > > I > > will still get the notification? > > > > Right, that's the idea. You'd be added as a watcher (and get notified) for > any patch that touches the area you care about, regardless of whether it > also touches some other areas. > > -Todd > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c5a9d007e3ef04a5aef76a-- From general-return-3699-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 18:38:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFB5F6B45 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11119 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 18:38:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11057 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 18:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11049 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 18:38:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.32] (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:38:39 +0000 Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vtVx1g0010mlR8UA3ueH3t; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:38:17 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vueH1g01s3QAh8g8XueKpb; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:38:19 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5EIcF51005388 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:38:15 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5EIcFn5005387 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:38:15 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:38:15 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Bigtop Proposal Message-ID: <20110614183814.GA5307@linspire.com> References: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Steve, 'functional' or rather system & integration tests are the core of this idea. If you're interested in a little history of this project feel free to check https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AVSlqgtwzvr9ZGdtNGM0OTJfMTRoYmRkMzhndA&hl=en_US&authkey=CLjMt_IN that's basically the original idea/initial implementation (based on the work done by Yahoo and known as HIT) which essentially lead to this proposal, I believe (anyone please correct me if you found this suggestion wrong). With regards, Cos On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:33PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom > White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build > and testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to > have coordinated releases. > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BigtopProposal > > For this to work, it needs support from all the hadoop-related projects > in the ASF, and, in an ideal world, integration with those bits from > outside (JUnit, Jetty) as well as downstream code (Cascading, etc). What > is key is that the projects it builds and tests will need to care about > the test failure reports, because BigTop should not be applying any > patches to private branches of the specific projects (the way Cloudera > and Ubuntu have done with the Hadoop and Linux source trees, > respectively). Some kind of synchronized release schedule would be nice > too, but I view that as a feature creep once the basic set up "build and > test everything" is done. > > This could also be the place to put the functional tests against live > clusters, tests which could eventually become the definition of > compatibility that we've discussed before. > > For these reasons > -I think everyone in the Hadoop-* projects dev teams ought to get > involved, initially in reviewing the proposal, then hopefully on the > mailing lists. > > -It might make sense for the hadoop, pig, hive, hama, mahout, hbase &c > committers to all have access to this, so that they can help evolve the > packaging and functional tests. > > thoughts? > > -steve From general-return-3700-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 19:58:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4B28688E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75383 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:58:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75223 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:58:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75211 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 19:58:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:58:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sradia@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:58:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c30.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.30]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5EJw52t013534; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:58:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308081486; bh=FaseLUIwTCzZgH/yyZp8hUcrug6rfFtbONo3wKy6Ft4=; h=Cc:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version: Subject:Date:References; b=egodKK8DQSQMsBJHV/h1AE0mskkMN/LnOZVCYDPNzn5ZWhsx0LgDLglv+DM+PqeIO d/qms1HfoQJYBB3aOhwCvQKAlJRjt4dikylyzcqCA++nihCruWC8rCykniGUN5oZR5 TFsNjAGj0e8aE70I0izsrAQ5rqQNfM66MBu5DZW0= Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Message-Id: <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-10--938195917 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:58:05 -0700 References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-10--938195917 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Tom White wrote: > Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate > references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in > Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in > MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or > MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within > Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these > references with Private. Okay so that was incorrectly stated in the Javadoc - if you read > > We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public > (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and > deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns? -1 I disagree with the proposed changes. Most folks are missing the point of limited private. The Jira (HADOOP-5073) that created this classification gives a very detailed explanation of the motivation and purpose of the classification. Unfortunately most of the explanation in Jira were not copied to the Javadoc. My mistake here. I will file a jira to copy the classification documentation from the Jira to a Javadoc. BTW the the javadoc is incorrect > Private means "Intended for use only within > Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc) The definition in the Jira (Hadoop-5073) explains that private means project private. It is private to HDFS or private to MR etc. Private does not mean private to Hadoop - otherwise MR can use any internal private class inside HDFS. We don't want that. When we did the actual annotation tags the words project-private was simplified to private since folks felt it was too verbose. The Jira states: >>> project-private the interface is for internal use within the project and should not be used by applications. It is subject to change at anytime without notice. Most interfaces of a project are project private. <<<< My mistake for not checking the actual javadoc carefully when Jacob's annotations patch was committed. I will file a jira to copy the document from the Jira to the Javadoc. I will post a longer email explaining my position and my -1 more clearly after I have had a chance to read all the emails carefully. sanjay --Apple-Mail-10--938195917-- From general-return-3701-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:21:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A78F56AFD for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24521 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24459 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24447 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:21:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sradia@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:21:22 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c30.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.30]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5ELK6jQ072116; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:20:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308086407; bh=xOJLlpEKDIPReEzUr7cT/q/szN7EquDuDkDadZP1qdM=; h=Cc:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version: Subject:Date:References; b=ZyRORXWKXMtYzR0FtqN/hdH9/lqzUygORyxxP1YBQGKYpVdOYbuaXFJ3aPVmLUKNS qT4RSAt+zIIqnEkpwTthVqltcpHipsSQzYb6mypnhHwS+jwPXmGU2EXX0qt00maMbZ Aqnc94PePMi0eqOCrscpF0S3kVlQ6wh/iNjqP+H4= Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-12--933275672 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:20:05 -0700 References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-12--933275672 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote: > > > > -1 > I disagree with the proposed changes. > ..... > I will post a longer email explaining my position and my -1 more > clearly after I have had a chance to read all the emails carefully. > > > sanjay Please don't take my -1 too strongly. It was NOT meant to be offensive. I saw a lot of +1s and wanted to make sure that this doesn't turn into a jira and a commit in few days. sanjay --Apple-Mail-12--933275672-- From general-return-3702-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:57:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB8026853 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21107 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:57:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21039 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:57:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21031 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:57:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:57:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:56:55 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so3966775pzk.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.13.228 with SMTP id k4mr3473638pbc.40.1308092194050; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm5923398pbk.36.2011.06.14.15.56.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:56:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--927489155 Subject: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:56:32 -0700 Message-Id: Cc: Apache Brand Management To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-5--927489155 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii All, Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be = called Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After = some cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good = base. I'd like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision = 12) and put the content on our web site. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-5--927489155-- From general-return-3703-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:32:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0984672D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58007 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57950 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57939 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:32:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:31 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2072646qyk.14 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=0XtclB361Ux4f0dM82ZvLINOIb334VgEJpB23nWjRMo=; b=ftb2NaQh5uYrvyhLNQMqfUbZxyWXtX9Z0fSNE0Dsm8L6pelRUC0O/PBXmbEjquuWPH L0PZJ8EtVm18qaajuNi+iGQtVJ0n9MO+ikd/+16LTZeC6UbH2nMvSANBzKWV1Gg0VYc2 YUhQPMFsGCbrDoTmZTttCUGry03jbkSTDupOg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=F7eY7O6DWV8878hFwuDTsOliFEoZf1acBZhfL2KaJTr0noIRuYYemJhg1HWarUrxdN /HA/2UVkJUVrvq1ZNQzVsb+5YRRjobiQ09oPn/+48DDIPeQftbxoiuffytdQKC8EJL3q cczDshWTAqB/2IkS7o700QmjwzhSeL5KpT2l4= Received: by 10.224.200.6 with SMTP id eu6mr1946669qab.220.1308094329243; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.74] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm5783712qcu.37.2011.06.14.16.32.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:32:03 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <550632.48430.qm@web65913.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze < > s29752-hadoopgeneral@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> A few minor problems: >> (1) I had committed MAPREDUCE-2588, however, an commit email was sent to >> both >> common-commits@ and mapreduce-commits@. >> > > I put up a patch to fix this on HADOOP-7106. Unfortunately I think Doug and > Ian are the only ones who can commit it, and they're both traveling at the > moment. So we may have to endure dup emails for a day or two. Sorry for the > mailbox noise > should be fixed now. (back home, nothing quite like sleeping in your own bed) > -Todd > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3704-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E081160B3 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63503 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63448 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63433 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:09 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:35:04 -0700 Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4F34B183-F0B2-4C42-B132-8D19DBCE9219@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be = called Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After = some cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good = base. I'd like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision = 12) and put the content on our web site. >=20 > Clearly, I'm +1. This is awesome. Good job everyone! A minor nit: I'd like to see some cleanup between the first = paragraph and the fourth paragraph in compatibility. Or was the = re-iteration of our "not a standards committee" intentional? It is sort = of awkward as it is currently written. Also, where can I download Camshaft? From general-return-3705-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:39:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0B646155 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70346 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:39:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70295 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:39:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70287 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:39:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:39:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:39:17 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so7968572vxa.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:38:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=LuhDH8RqdnoBHVfmtKgG8HQeJ1fglDS7euN1aihrUqA=; b=NCj9sfMMWxMd3aMCfeKJ/FWDmiLZuWzapZz2W9ykqGNMXeiirZCmfS4//b/1Ujc12X 89sPJmYrmD24Q2dIeVqk7GlUFtpe9+oSBs2Xtn4uof448IIr1aTrCWBJJLcEYLrDbnwG R8lhUnVZP1ksXlq3uvkYWA02o19I42h8JNwg4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=FgwFlABMqFxijnYFgOImMy91yuQ11nRjTlNGNJ6CPfvMXF+2cIlQjdLctrJj1upX2K nWUL7Y/Ygmz/aJiaGSay+hc88YCLj6r2nx42TpaPJtyyVb2PHDTfkwdDMq0JzuhIym5Z uosozoPqpSj9CBRnAuLa+OM/RsOVwiNh+UjeI= Received: by 10.52.76.198 with SMTP id m6mr658061vdw.0.1308094736740; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.74] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm2504037vdu.31.2011.06.14.16.38.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-24--924950421 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:38:51 +1000 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: References: To: trademarks@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-24--924950421 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +1. great job Steve! On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be = called Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After = some cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good = base. I'd like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision = 12) and put the content on our web site. >=20 > Clearly, I'm +1. >=20 > -- Owen -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not = believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard --Apple-Mail-24--924950421-- From general-return-3706-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:16:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C09467D6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5789 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:16:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5729 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:16:56 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:16:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:16:56 +0000 From: Allen Wittenauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hadoop Java Versions Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1F501BC2-7671-45B5-8D31-599C25068191@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) While we're looking at the wiki, could folks update = http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions with whatever versions = of Hadoop they are using successfully? Thanks. P.S., yes, I'm thinking about upgrading ours. :p= From general-return-3707-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:17:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C8AA6B17 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8964 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:17:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8907 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8899 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:17:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:17:23 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so4480903ywk.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.61.20 with SMTP id j20mr88593yba.175.1308097020430; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ISh2Fc4pdTHWyeMFqx6286tIZKs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 - makes sense! -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 15:56, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be calle= d Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cle= anup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like = a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put the cont= ent on our web site. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3708-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA6D6CE6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46465 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46396 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46382 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:48:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:48:22 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6794440wwi.29 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:48:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.46.21 with SMTP id q21mr1393038web.113.1308098881800; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:48:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be calle= d Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cle= anup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like = a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put the cont= ent on our web site. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen Thanks for putting this together Steve, good stuff! Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. Specifically, that cherry-picking changes from trunk or release branches and, in general, any code that's been subject to lazy consensus approval by the PMC does not make you a derivative work. For example, RedHat backports [1] to Apache HTTP and of course still calls it Apache HTTP. In short, an Apache Hadoop release with a backport of PMC approved code or critical security fix is not powered by Hadoop, it is Hadoop, while a new product that contains or runs atop Hadoop is powered by Hadoop. Reasonable? Thanks, Eli 1. https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/?sc_cid=3D3093 From general-return-3709-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 01:15:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92AD8690B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64932 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64789 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64769 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:07 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:04 -0700 Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > In short, an Apache Hadoop release with a backport of PMC approved > code or critical security fix is not powered by Hadoop, it is Hadoop, > while a new product that contains or runs atop Hadoop is powered by > Hadoop. >=20 > Reasonable? I'd say: Security, yes. Features, no. The reason I say this is because there have been many, many, = many posts in the -user mailing lists where people are confused as to = what versions have what features because their local branch has a back = ported fix. [I think I run out of fingers if I count how many times = just the mapred.map.child.java.opts was said to be "in 20" prior to the = 0.20.203 release...] This also adds pressure to do timely releases. :) From general-return-3710-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 01:16:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67D3C6CE4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67597 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:16:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67481 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:16:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67473 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 01:16:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:16:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:16:15 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6811301wwi.29 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.103 with SMTP id q81mr6905438wep.83.1308100554090; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:15:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be calle= d Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cle= anup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like = a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put the cont= ent on our web site. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen I'd like to make another suggestion. Currently we call two types of things powered by Apache Hadoop: 1. Something that runs on Hadoop (eg HBase or Karmasphere) 2. Something that includes Hadoop artifacts/source code Shouldn't we distinguish between these two, such that the 2nd is not powered by Hadoop? Eg tc server is not powered by Apache Tomcat right? Apologies for having discussion on a vote thread but this is the first time I've seen the current revision and it seems reasonable to have an opportunity to discuss a specific revision before voting on it. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3711-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 01:45:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42E166CE1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86848 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:45:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86789 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86781 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 01:45:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:45:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:45:44 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so6828304wwi.29 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:45:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.245.4 with SMTP id n4mr1478588wer.83.1308102323390; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:45:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:45:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> In short, an Apache Hadoop release with a backport of PMC approved >> code or critical security fix is not powered by Hadoop, it is Hadoop, >> while a new product that contains or runs atop Hadoop is powered by >> Hadoop. >> >> Reasonable? > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I'd say: Security, yes. =A0Features, no. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The reason I say this is because there have been many, man= y, many posts in the -user mailing lists where people are confused as to wh= at versions have what features because their local branch has a back ported= fix. =A0[I think I run out of fingers if I count how many times just the m= apred.map.child.java.opts was said to be "in 20" prior to the 0.20.203 rele= ase...] > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This also adds pressure to do timely releases. :) > I agree this is a problem, I don't think this is an effective means of solving it. Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? I'm -1 on a proposal that does this. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3712-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:16:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E1D7497A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26608 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:16:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26557 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:16:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26547 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:16:52 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:16:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:16:51 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so8071024iym.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:16:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.139 with SMTP id b11mr6945938ibl.134.1308104211156; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.212.149 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:16:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:16:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on revision 12. Thanks for all your work on this, Steve. -C On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0=A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be ca= lled > Hadoop at=A0http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some > cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd > like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put t= he > content on our web site. > Clearly, I'm +1. > -- Owen From general-return-3713-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:33:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CFC64C59 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36622 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:33:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36504 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:33:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36496 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:33:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:33:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:33:18 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so4553362ywk.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.235.20 with SMTP id i20mr184200ybh.232.1308105177144; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:32:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:32:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:32:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SD-vUthQjY0fs8FVe64Ppr59-yU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 18:15, Eli Collins wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> All, >> =A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be call= ed Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cl= eanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like= a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put the con= tent on our web site. >> >> Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> -- Owen > > I'd like to make another suggestion. Currently we call two types of > things powered by Apache Hadoop: > > 1. Something that runs on Hadoop (eg HBase or Karmasphere) To be completely precise Karmasphere doesn't 'run on Hadoop'. Their products "integrate with a variety of Hadoop distributions and related technologies..." as you can see here http://karmasphere.com/Miscellaneous/overview.html. Although in case of HBase you right ;) Cos > 2. Something that includes Hadoop artifacts/source code > > Shouldn't we distinguish between these two, such that the 2nd is not > powered by Hadoop? Eg tc server is not powered by Apache Tomcat right? > > Apologies for having discussion on a vote thread but this is the first > time I've seen the current revision and it seems reasonable to have an > opportunity to discuss a specific revision before voting on it. > > Thanks, > Eli > From general-return-3714-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:46:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1ABA40D3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45153 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44977 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44967 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:24 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so8092765iym.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.111.228 with SMTP id t36mr7369180ibp.59.1308105963677; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w8sm3592908ibh.1.2011.06.14.19.45.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:45:58 -0700 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> References: To: trademarks@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we > should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that > backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may = be called Hadoop. There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding = Hadoop-ecosystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the = different "versions" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the = resources or the necessary compatibility test suite to test = compatibility between the different sets of cherry picked patches. We = also don't have time to ensure that all of the 1,000's of patches = applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) different versions have = been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apache license, a company = Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of Hadoop without = releasing their source code that would enable verification. In summary, 1. Hadoop is very successful. 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use = the Hadoop name. 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are = following the rules. 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are = compatible. 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness = between companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called = Hadoop. That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security = patches that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. -- Owen From general-return-3715-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:46:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 849A94422 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46716 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46605 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46590 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:46:53 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:46:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:52 -0700 Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an > enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying > that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should > your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? I'm -1 on a > proposal that does this. I think there is a big difference between some company that uses = Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a = distribution for others to use, usually for-profit.= From general-return-3716-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:52:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40F274BE0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50543 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:52:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50274 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50266 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:52:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:52:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:52:33 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so5919985gxk.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.165.4 with SMTP id n4mr195456ybe.289.1308106332085; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:52:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:51:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:51:52 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: usmVmnA-ybW2BsoOdtGWs8T6opY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >> that they are using Hadoop? =A0You've patched Hadoop many times, should >> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? =A0I'm -1 on a >> proposal that does this. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I think there is a big difference between some company tha= t uses Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a di= stribution for others to use, usually for-profit. Just as the reminder: this whole conversation has started as a result of EMC announcement of 100% compatible version of Apache Hadoop. So, Allen's point is right on target here: the above example is simply incorrect. Cos From general-return-3717-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 03:00:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A847421A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58028 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:00:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57947 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:00:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57923 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 03:00:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:00:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=ASF_LIST_OPS,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hailong.yang1115@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:00:33 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so4105906pve.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:references:subject:message-id :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=cmo9IaFfqAHHiGDLFg2R26fPuXI2iPG5Wws6ya2Hw+8=; b=i7EKWyvZ1xd+TN42QHvEDcExE/ftZMiWK/uofiIBLuEL7GOd94VWndZV3bhSw7/Y4e LNOGhRKgaGO62Sk6Kzg6/s3iahRRwKnPQ4h2lbDGps39PuLBlsOFNkv14yUMXi6eCae/ kHlEZUrWednizAXsEP04SmG3TENLhS4fjyPCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:references:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; b=vqRotgOCEp5GwwotIFbBSHO4WWimxwFaPCcZG/Gqs8jOnjmi1Llj26ge5uE8Hwfb9i Agmn73CJfDType1zHeYZwOKRS0R8Ho93iHbQLzAvuGfaqLW/tk/bNamZ1lYLpunfdZHz Ah7MWYJSaOavvdxE7fSOIVuQUimtR4ye/AQLE= Received: by 10.68.10.42 with SMTP id f10mr65196pbb.259.1308106811574; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HailongYangLen (tu200023.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.200.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g10sm1081091pbi.9.2011.06.14.20.00.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:00:08 +0800 From: "hailong.yang1115" To: "general" , "general-help" , "hdfs-user" , "hdfs-user-help" References: <201106101328462304641@gmail.com> Subject: Fw: Problems about the job counters Message-ID: <201106151100061050081@gmail.com> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 26 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon735314350340_=====" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=====003_Dragon735314350340_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpTb3JyeSBmb3Igc2VuZGluZyB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFnYWluIGJ1dCBJIGdvdCBubyBhbnN3ZXJz IGZyb20gdGhlIGZpcnN0IG9uZS4gQW55b25lIHBsZWFzZSBoZWxwIG9yIGZvcndhcmQgaXQgdG8g bWFpbC1saXN0IHRoYXQgd291bGQgaGVscC4NCg0KMjAxMS0wNi0xNQ0KDQoNCg0KKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCiogSGFpbG9uZyBZYW5nLCBQ aEQuIENhbmRpZGF0ZSANCiogU2luby1HZXJtYW4gSm9pbnQgU29mdHdhcmUgSW5zdGl0dXRlLCAN CiogU2Nob29sIG9mIENvbXB1dGVyIFNjaWVuY2UmRW5naW5lZXJpbmcsIEJlaWhhbmcgVW5pdmVy c2l0eQ0KKiBQaG9uZTogKDg2LTAxMCk4MjMxNTkwOA0KKiBFbWFpbDogaGFpbG9uZy55YW5nMTEx NUBnbWFpbC5jb20NCiogQWRkcmVzczogRzQxMywgTmV3IE1haW4gQnVpbGRpbmcgaW4gQmVpaGFu ZyBVbml2ZXJzaXR5LCANCiogICAgICAgICAgICAgIE5vLjM3IFh1ZVl1YW4gUm9hZCxIYWlEaWFu IERpc3RyaWN0LCANCiogICAgICAgICAgICAgIEJlaWppbmcsUC5SLkNoaW5hLDEwMDE5MQ0KKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCg0KDQoNCreivP7I y6O6IGhhaWxvbmcueWFuZzExMTUNCreiy83Ksbzko7ogMjAxMS0wNi0xMCAxMzoyODo0Ng0KytW8 /sjLo7ogZ2VuZXJhbA0Ks63LzaO6IA0K1vfM4qO6IFByb2JsZW1zIGFib3V0IHRoZSBqb2IgY291 bnRlcnMNCg0KRGVhciBhbGwsDQoNCkkgYW0gdHJ5aW5nIHRvIHRoZSBidWlsdC1pbiBleGFtcGxl IHdvcmRjb3VudCB3aXRoIG5lYXJseSAxNUdCIGlucHV0LiBXaGVuIHRoZSBIYWRvb3Agam9iIGZp bmlzaGVkLCBJIGdvdCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGNvdW50ZXJzLg0KDQoNCkNvdW50ZXJNYXBSZWR1 Y2VUb3RhbA0KSm9iIENvdW50ZXJzTGF1bmNoZWQgcmVkdWNlIHRhc2tzMDAxDQpSYWNrLWxvY2Fs IG1hcCB0YXNrczAwMzUNCkxhdW5jaGVkIG1hcCB0YXNrczAwMiwzMTgNCkRhdGEtbG9jYWwgbWFw IHRhc2tzMDAyLDI4Mw0KRmlsZVN5c3RlbUNvdW50ZXJzRklMRV9CWVRFU19SRUFEMjIsODYzLDU4 MCw2NTYxNyw2NTQsOTQzLDM0MTQwLDUxOCw1MjMsOTk3DQpIREZTX0JZVEVTX1JFQUQxNTQsNDAw LDk5Nyw0NTkwMTU0LDQwMCw5OTcsNDU5DQpGSUxFX0JZVEVTX1dSSVRURU4zMyw0OTAsODI5LDQw MzE3LDY1NCw5NDMsMzQxNTEsMTQ1LDc3Miw3NDQNCkhERlNfQllURVNfV1JJVFRFTjAyLDc0Nywz NTYsNzA0Miw3NDcsMzU2LDcwNA0KDQoNCk15IHF1ZXN0aW9uIGlzIHdoYXQgZG9lcyB0aGUgRklM RV9CWVRFU19SRUFEIGNvdW50ZXIgbWVhbj8gQW5kIHdoYXQgaXMgdGhlIGRpZmZlcmVuY2UgYmV0 d2VlbiBGSUxFX0JZVEVTX1JFQUQgYW5kIEhERlNfQllURVNfUkVBRD8gSW4gbXkgb3Bpbmlvbiwg YWxsIHRoZSBpbnB1dCBpcyBsb2NhdGVkIGluIEhERlMsIHNvIHdoZXJlIGRvZXMgRklMRV9CWVRF U19SRUFEIGNvbWUgZnJvbSBkdXJpbmcgdGhlIG1hcCBwaGFzZT8NCg0KDQpBbnkgaGVscCB3aWxs IGJlIGFwcHJlY2lhdGVkIQ0KDQpIYWlsb25nDQoNCjIwMTEtMDYtMTAgDQoNCg0KDQoqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KKiBIYWlsb25nIFlhbmcs IFBoRC4gQ2FuZGlkYXRlIA0KKiBTaW5vLUdlcm1hbiBKb2ludCBTb2Z0d2FyZSBJbnN0aXR1dGUs IA0KKiBTY2hvb2wgb2YgQ29tcHV0ZXIgU2NpZW5jZSZFbmdpbmVlcmluZywgQmVpaGFuZyBVbml2 ZXJzaXR5DQoqIFBob25lOiAoODYtMDEwKTgyMzE1OTA4DQoqIEVtYWlsOiBoYWlsb25nLnlhbmcx MTE1QGdtYWlsLmNvbQ0KKiBBZGRyZXNzOiBHNDEzLCBOZXcgTWFpbiBCdWlsZGluZyBpbiBCZWlo YW5nIFVuaXZlcnNpdHksIA0KKiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgTm8uMzcgWHVlWXVhbiBSb2FkLEhhaURp YW4gRGlzdHJpY3QsIA0KKiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQmVpamluZyxQLlIuQ2hpbmEsMTAwMTkxDQoq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0K --=====003_Dragon735314350340_=====-- From general-return-3718-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 03:19:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 758864DFF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73165 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:19:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72384 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72348 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 03:19:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:19:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:19:42 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so8153878iwr.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.187.232 with SMTP id cx40mr7682525ibb.73.1308107961744; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w11sm455ibw.24.2011.06.14.20.19.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7--911722727 Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:19:18 -0700 Message-Id: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-7--911722727 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii All, We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them all on a page, here: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of = voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important = thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you = don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote = will automatically roll over to your next choice. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-7--911722727-- From general-return-3719-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 03:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA0B64AB8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85838 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85562 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 03:45:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85540 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 03:45:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:45:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:45:19 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so261955bwz.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.7.156 with SMTP id d28mr14746bkd.28.1308109499209; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.195 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:44:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:44:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517588b5a07199904a5b7fa10 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517588b5a07199904a5b7fa10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My vote: 5 1 6 2 3 4 tl;dr regarding STV - since we're only selecting one winner, STV reduces to instant-runoff voting. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --001517588b5a07199904a5b7fa10-- From general-return-3720-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 04:07:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F80146FD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 440 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 392 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 383 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 04:07:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:07:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:07:04 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so21565ywk.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.229.17 with SMTP id b17mr263237ybh.61.1308110803143; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:06:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:06:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:06:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RVbPV8i2DLJmpjoO9nC5Zr6YuaA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4,2,6,1,3,5 -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3721-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 04:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E8C4DE4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11231 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11172 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11164 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 04:28:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:28:21 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so288086bwz.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.233.15 with SMTP id jw15mr38038bkb.48.1308112081200; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:28:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:27:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:27:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3979db46ed266204a5b8931e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b3979db46ed266204a5b8931e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone? My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --485b3979db46ed266204a5b8931e-- From general-return-3722-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 04:40:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F6EC4540 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19784 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19724 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19715 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of amarsri@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:47 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5F4e4TG069198 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:40:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308112805; bh=HcLg0dR4hRES+in8MT5sSitIoHzzDxM9P/s7RDICA80=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=fOQIK94XQo00APXjHJ+Ya3PDnXipzWu7ZZuJFqFkgvenez8Y8gIs5GePBXEuCi0Af KJcmFNwQ5WZwfOFhYuRjNUQEDYpdj5QkXsg1SWiaf/Xlrjdi5YvfMCBk4NPt/xfkx3 ZhLqcp4jJVGfGwPYsG4w0XbTWfxQ/onWjlXciJRw= Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:10:03 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:10:02 +0530 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrFLk163gjScLrTYmEbeZ55yC1fAAAZDve Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA1E357A2E2C5amarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CA1E357A2E2C5amarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6 Thanks Amareshwari On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone? My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --_000_CA1E357A2E2C5amarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3723-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 05:08:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDDD443E3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35383 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35332 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35324 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 05:08:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:08:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:07:59 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2175595qyk.14 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=HBotSOGfQ9SjvDf8hvlpkaEt1z+hLKEdFL542yNsivw=; b=tDj2oMCI+36t+T3dz+oUVYpFDpZtDg3hAT/3QtvJwkrFeqo/gdvlS9K75VfOmDbXSD cJ2KvFDurU0FJi6rVLSUk04orDVOaR+XvjyQXNEfl/Tuz00RxyV7jV+MlHozcuBG4X8b BGMbmJpgB/fOQyhr5961V8Fqhtaz8jwIaWw5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=MzHmFZitRTpe1hda5PRX/6dyuArN+BoIh8PBI9z1qxTUDn649kBwkBskFgIR633vJb L8PSBMjPegMG5NSRNqU6NBcZXsO5xHG2aeY/3GrSCgCKPcczJajqi8wxEnRQNCCB8miZ fwRosWMYsrKPZ0sXH9DBoaWcVxxIgwZIeKYNY= Received: by 10.224.195.201 with SMTP id ed9mr53009qab.20.1308114458397; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.74] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r32sm54733qcs.14.2011.06.14.22.07.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:07:32 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5,4,2,3,6,1 On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ From general-return-3724-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 06:37:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC0442D4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 122 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:37:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99965 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:37:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99148 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 06:37:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:37:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:37:18 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so360402bwz.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.7.156 with SMTP id d28mr142593bkd.28.1308119818267; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:36:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.195 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:36:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:36:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517588b5a176ddf04a5ba61ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517588b5a176ddf04a5ba61ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than what is displayed on Owen's link. Here's a similar page which shows all the logos at a few different sizes: http://people.apache.org/~atm/hadoop-powered-by/ (This is the reason I prefer choice #5 to all others. I believe it'll be more visually distinct from the project logo at small sizes, which was the point of developing a "Powered By" logo in the first place.) -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --001517588b5a176ddf04a5ba61ec-- From general-return-3725-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 06:44:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D2E3443A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5553 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5509 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:44:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5501 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 06:44:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:44:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jithendranath.j@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.67] (HELO szxga04-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:44:09 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LMT00IG6JWV78@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:41:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LMT004I2JWVTJ@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:41:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) by szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:41:17 +0800 Received: from blrnshtipl5nc (10.18.1.35) by SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:41:18 +0800 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:11:17 +0530 From: Jithendranath Subject: RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo In-reply-to: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> X-Originating-IP: [10.18.1.35] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: jithendranath.j@huawei.com Message-id: Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4841 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcwrCxtTJAsk34pzTn+PMo2w+Z+2dAAHA5Eg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4,2,6,1,5,3 :) -- Joijoide **************************************************************************** *********** This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! ________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo All, We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice. -- Owen From general-return-3726-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 06:46:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 203DA41A0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8429 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8421 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 06:46:43 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:46:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username edwardyoon, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:46:43 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so54897iwr.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:46:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.197.10 with SMTP id ei10mr119567ibb.176.1308120402634; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.37.201 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:46:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:46:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 4,3,5,6,2,1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jithendranath wrote: > > 4,2,6,1,5,3 > > :) > > -- Joijoide > > *************************************************************************= *** > *********** > This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, > which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed > above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, > but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or > dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender= by > phone or email immediately and delete it! > > ________________________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo > > All, > =C2=A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng > is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > > --=20 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon From general-return-3727-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 06:54:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 122114C6B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18671 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18620 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18609 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 06:54:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bijeetsingh@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:48 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so292435fxm.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7s5CInTba40hrIbDJ1PHdwNCa4/yPTs7GNaJrriu+6c=; b=Q2AS4zr0l88vlPp3SdxVe38mqBas44PXUm8rgJDjoEKkGpPgT94Rlrqn+V9g2rXdwl tEcv2EA1akHrRCBRPzqKlLdAZ3SLE/VZNre+DsIKsTY2MHGsN3pu3CtcogZtd8lB8Z0e B/op2VsosQ81TBXJVHJSmARr8fsrk3Itl2VMI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cEl7/9Q4zrNPPG53esreYXt4mLKLt+P6m0TsjcUdFP9JjqJrp4XotfzQ5Bez1m+8a6 dNCoxJIqmqY+bg1kurG9NNS58T/m9En2fiXU7c8vxWt4mQ9FoNYLqhMDVLVcYvff2dsb lEqSljzrLsggMQLH5cZi3iYvUJshi0lbcqJ6U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.30.82 with SMTP id t18mr146496fac.106.1308120868042; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.148.8 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:24:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Bijeet Singh To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151744866ca9b94004a5ba9f58 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151744866ca9b94004a5ba9f58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 1 Cheers, Bijeet > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo > > > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing > > is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't > > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > > automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > --00151744866ca9b94004a5ba9f58-- From general-return-3728-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 06:58:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E23B84CEB for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23960 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:58:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23899 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 06:58:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23891 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 06:58:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:58:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of teamphy6@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:57:57 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so372292bwz.35 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hB8sc5CxUhVvQyTr3S+rrUvL7AcasZDxTeqthJi1hdQ=; b=nHZXEuHyngwEOjTP2dsficMDDwj3KLYeN4rwPQmqvECk6fUL9WxycwOzjjVFxdv4K9 2RVbkA4Z2wrn4zacjw36qN7OwcRLaXJMLG8bbSxFrIog/fUHlQ4Xtu5CZTl1t7KpaLkI YI934h+L8iB3VztlPJsZTpI1j5J3Nm1+hUefU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=O0crcXKV6c2aG8wTWwhmp67wWH6FhG7f2FpD7/m/NKv8wzawB0TXHw9p8DKSlZ3XRF iqpgk8CC5NEQcmBVGfHjjXfX1+VvuGUickGMX9+VQiJWRrmSFN/qfjFc4ilZPj+0kXXZ w4rZ4lwNLgC7QsLFB1eRjOLMU6gvkn+QefK+M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.144 with SMTP id j16mr130887bkl.180.1308121057138; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.20.3 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:57:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Daniel Jue To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My vote: 5,4,3,2,6,1 IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4. From general-return-3729-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 07:34:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C9A244D7 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52057 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 07:34:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51991 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 07:34:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51983 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 07:34:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:33:59 +0000 Received: by yic24 with SMTP id 24so109839yic.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=EwH1OWVIv7WOTPO2l1l8RaGZzuYyTNAmSu7+ZeIw8VA=; b=PaaA38POhmhsiN0bQDgW/pYjoAV8Av/KgUKtiE8huH0spl5esvG+onC1Tt6Ls68C5g uSTegtxhn8kCaHu/A8T3swtDkeVIWeuUzsA69Byej+Cf68DJju+/iSTEIUWS+kuvhP6G eQkeBZrsvd0gyhxke56LqDy126OOCqef5LcXU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=frAJ+UZdn/+A2+X2mP54ANBViwRlGdvIDubbpOkg302/fAKS0WKb6PuM/AKdzbxaiV 1NdvGuAG/5JDJNBa9Npz/bFQ3phn3QK8PuSI2uXSIxnqBO/qHZEj8H9XRBFIZRFjP+Li n2OrUFi8tKHm9ZMGK1S8jXrZkg77S+I1x5HdA= Received: by 10.150.132.6 with SMTP id f6mr429460ybd.425.1308123218231; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.220.6 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:33:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd403a0bec08c04a5bb2b5f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd403a0bec08c04a5bb2b5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5 4 2 6 3 1 - Aaron On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > My vote: > > 5,4,3,2,6,1 > > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant > in 4. > --000e0cd403a0bec08c04a5bb2b5f-- From general-return-3730-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 08:45:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 019844379 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39300 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 08:45:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39239 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 08:45:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39230 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 08:45:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:45:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:44:54 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so167713vxa.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.115.130 with SMTP id jo2mr378278vdb.43.1308127473064; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:44:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [151.76.103.169] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a95d5a5b7e04a5bc29fe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec548a95d5a5b7e04a5bc29fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6 Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't think the others make the required visual case. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu < amarsri@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6 > > Thanks > Amareshwari > > On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > > Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone? > > My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4 > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > --bcaec548a95d5a5b7e04a5bc29fe-- From general-return-3731-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 09:27:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAB884323 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91021 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90935 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90926 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 09:27:14 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.65.8.159]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:27:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4DF87AEF.6080506@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:27:11 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 5, 2, 4, 6, 1, 3 Doug On 06/15/2011 05:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3732-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 09:50:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEDBE4684 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26066 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:50:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26000 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:50:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25992 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 09:50:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:50:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE6E1BA94C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:52 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6ToA3cbnAvek for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13D41BA93A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:51 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308736177.36536@qgUvT/O9GYhWZbV9uvuNpw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5F9naNC029054 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF88030.9020600@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:36 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5F9naNC029054 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/06/11 02:15, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > I run out of fingers if I count how many times just the mapred.map.child.java.opts was said to be "in 20" prior to the 0.20.203 release...] yeah, that incident involving Camshaft 3.02 beta and your left hand really reduced your counting ability. From general-return-3733-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 09:53:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74C644719 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30426 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:53:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30366 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:53:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30358 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 09:53:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2843EB7DC2 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:41 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FP3xt1l8OSjj for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643ADB7DBF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:41 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308736347.66403@CEDbIim4uLbqoeq2DrU9rg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5F9qQPj029148 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:26 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5F9qQPj029148 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/06/11 03:51, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >>> that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should >>> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? I'm -1 on a >>> proposal that does this. >> >> I think there is a big difference between some company that uses Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a distribution for others to use, usually for-profit. > > Just as the reminder: this whole conversation has started as a result > of EMC announcement of 100% compatible version of Apache Hadoop. So, > Allen's point is right on target here: the above example is simply > incorrect. I seem to recall this dicussion starting a bit earlier, with the whole notion of compatibility, before EMC got involved. Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues. also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache Hadoop build"? From general-return-3734-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 09:59:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04FF24871 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37999 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37957 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37949 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 09:59:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA7A1BA355 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:58:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uoxE7qHCXUIq for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:58:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDE91BA318 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:58:42 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308736708.75957@FQrK4Uf514jLjxYS4B8sHg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5F9wRYX029288 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:58:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF88243.4050307@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:58:27 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <4F34B183-F0B2-4C42-B132-8D19DBCE9219@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4F34B183-F0B2-4C42-B132-8D19DBCE9219@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5F9wRYX029288 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/06/11 00:35, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > A minor nit: I'd like to see some cleanup between the first paragraph and the fourth paragraph in compatibility. Or was the re-iteration of our "not a standards committee" intentional? It is sort of awkward as it is currently written. well it is a wiki... > > Also, where can I download Camshaft? It's a fork of Hadoop 0.15 optimised for Windows ME and FAT32 that requires a human to fetch blocks from remote machines using a floppy - a process that limits blocksize to 1.44MB and kills your latency. You don't really want it. What you saw on the page was marketing's spin on the harsh truth. From general-return-3735-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 12:04:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6D5B4E69 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98657 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:04:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98609 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98587 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 12:04:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:04:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:04:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3341BA969 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:04:08 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2yqz4JG7uFZq for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:04:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874521BA963 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:04:08 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308744234.6353@1aOCQPGbksWRjc4jTEIWJg Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5FC3qjR003293 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:03:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF89FA8.6090902@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:03:52 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5FC3qjR003293 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 15/06/11 04:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > my vote: 4, 5, 2 From general-return-3736-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 12:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 058B24562 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23495 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:15:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23450 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23442 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 12:15:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:15:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:15:22 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so313013iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.74.72 with SMTP id v8mr433371icj.282.1308140101795; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.218.72 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:14:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:40 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5 6 4 2 3 1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --=20 Harsh J From general-return-3737-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 12:19:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD0EB497F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34203 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34159 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34151 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 12:19:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:44 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so525748fxm.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/fWwv61/JYqO9mitFTbRuIXUqRn+j3LaKVlrbd4oFCc=; b=UqcaStcaKMabkxEShv8At8J8Ic0gRTt+yY7h99IM7MV++Hrqc+0l75+CFfZgf0Kcah FqxqzAdOZMDoxZyqAJtVWkk9OzGb0PzCDQIM8HV2vpy9ohdf0j1DhBmx7vPnQ8EPN/Ru pqZf+BpEhTZwLmGPppwlBNmnhDERzm3gTLyJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=USjuPx/Q20BP1ELEhzCKbumXdFG5kXyJqfhJuGifs4pAtBnsW8mQJfhjy3rsvht8Wc gkwqt+IoXoFEm6XlVvBFTPKN80528unpy6LNsdFfwlveqG4fl1jQedL6HorYr8F9hBRV MY4G/S+FrbDaCQ8TOGzHyp/9MrJ2u//SwclpU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.136 with SMTP id 8mr537580far.16.1308140364226; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.19 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:19:24 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce00688b9e00504a5bf2990 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0ce00688b9e00504a5bf2990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5 only -dhruba On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J wrote: > 5 6 4 2 3 1 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0ce00688b9e00504a5bf2990-- From general-return-3738-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 12:29:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF188407C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59373 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:29:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59318 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59309 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 12:29:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:29:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hadoop.li@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:29:46 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so328283iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:29:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KAVFrNFKuKDgLoPJI8Ome3GJ/Nym52pj+UKTKAAHXNM=; b=Tol8llfKurKOHswR806Cao3XcHHucWscs9uZQob49IiTpg8Y7id4z6jWnrC0BatRkv 8d5XuznWRVY8ue7+fAWP4CDCBVCDSyC18ij0o6HDrn2fWcg3GmJ5S6A7e+QCmZedNGqz b8iAAvdZuTNxjunqQthYwg91nBr9rncK4b8Ps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UKZRWQEEQ7xxrzK0u2B8An6t9y0oN9eVidh3n0CCQRE+OZCvgpB0ok5IXPY3z7+kEr vHtErxzmYVHiIToH4EEUX0DzGdEw3HiwGYFfAJNb3oryU1r5rpHDvLrXnA4mewJCBv3P UqzatUs21lPaWzYfSnBzmpe3rWtvdxj99YyjA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.163.130 with SMTP id c2mr422203icy.522.1308140964844; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.222.65 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:29:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:29:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Weiwei Li To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba61395c8693d104a5bf4d00 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba61395c8693d104a5bf4d00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5 6 2 1 4 3 2011/6/15 Dhruba Borthakur > 5 only > > -dhruba > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J wrote: > > > 5 6 4 2 3 1 > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > All, > > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them > > all on a page, here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Harsh J > > > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > --90e6ba61395c8693d104a5bf4d00-- From general-return-3739-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 14:34:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA0694330 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88235 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88077 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88064 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 14:34:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:34:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:34:47 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so396887gxk.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.131.71 with SMTP id y7mr579426ics.315.1308148465163; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hp8sm454495icc.11.2011.06.15.07.34.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:34:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone? Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to = vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however.=20 -- Owen=20= From general-return-3740-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 14:36:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD9F443A3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94457 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:36:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94396 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:36:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94385 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 14:36:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:36:14 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so483673iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.66.135 with SMTP id n7mr459108ibi.189.1308148553146; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d10sm260859ibb.32.2011.06.15.07.35.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:35:50 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole = elephant in 4. Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is = interest in adopting it. -- Owen= From general-return-3741-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 14:46:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A01B84DF8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16123 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16061 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 14:46:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16053 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 14:46:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:46:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:46:05 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so493363iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.75.193 with SMTP id b1mr522521ick.238.1308148880717; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm264572ibc.25.2011.06.15.07.41.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:41:16 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of = the > time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller = than > what is displayed on Owen's link. That's a really good point Aaron. The fonts in all of the examples are = probably smaller than they should be to be very readable in the 4th (100 = pixel width) column. -- Owen= From general-return-3742-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:15:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 673CC4F75 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75831 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75782 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75774 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:15:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:15:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:15:21 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1793305B-F27D-485A-BBA6-55156DF72E7F@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > 4, 2, 6 > > Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut > the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't > think the others make the required visual case. +1 4,2,6 From general-return-3743-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:21:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 805A54742 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86042 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85981 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85973 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:21:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:21:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of devaraj.k@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.67] (HELO szxga04-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:20:56 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LMU00IER7YAAC@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LMU00GQQ7YAT7@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) by szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:32 +0800 Received: from blrnshtipl5nc (10.18.1.35) by SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:33 +0800 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:50:31 +0530 From: Devaraj K Subject: RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.18.1.35] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: devaraj.k@huawei.com Message-id: Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4841 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcwraWhmYdZo7qUIRQSFPHGKWevmrgABYIYg 4,5,1,2,6,3 Devaraj K -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:04 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone? Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however. -- Owen = From general-return-3744-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:24:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44785479C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89495 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89436 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89428 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:24:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:24:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 12020 invoked by uid 507); 15 Jun 2011 15:23:38 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.650014 secs); 15 Jun 2011 15:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2011 15:23:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3FA3DC573; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:25:25 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icb+dNQdXUU9; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:25:24 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (unknown [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FC13DC4BE; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:25:24 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DF8D5F4.8090405@uci.cu> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:25:32 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Harsh J Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote: > 5 6 4 2 3 1 My vote 5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2 -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3745-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:29:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDF4A4A0C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2641 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2578 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:29:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2570 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:29:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 69.147.107.20 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tgraves@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:49 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FFT9EA099163 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:29:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308151750; bh=NNxMgL+ePv5LvK/tC6jRUGUVoI04TEU0JdW+1k7fygg=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=aK+CpDJYZ3cC+epHkI87DlzIV7/9k73xhgMxoeR4QiEp/I40NoCUm9vxZJZMsi0cz x1qEgYgi5m6xs2+ghZBm7JvKwwqnN+x2w8dpjMGRyRr9/dZuqxR3Y5T8nP3HhBz92Y vLZ4KCR50eQ6Xb9CdCdz/uF+pyfnzI4z9d3xneh0= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:29:10 -0700 From: Thomas Graves To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:29:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrCyJZLQPXI5UcQ/KYyVlvXAmo7QAZdQ6N Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6 Tom On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them= all > on a page, here: >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >=20 > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, > let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng is > to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >=20 > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >=20 > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 >=20 From general-return-3746-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEDDF4E1C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69873 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69745 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69737 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.245.208.150] (HELO dm-mail01.mozilla.org) (63.245.208.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:53:22 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from joubert.local (v74-nslb.mozilla.org [10.2.74.4]) (Authenticated sender: xstevens@mozilla.com) by dm-mail01.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546C1B803B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DF8D55D.80705@mozilla.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:53:01 -0700 From: Xavier Stevens User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110528 Thunderbird/5.0b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <4DF8D5F4.8090405@uci.cu> In-Reply-To: <4DF8D5F4.8090405@uci.cu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My vote: 5, 4, 2, 6, 3, 1 On 6/15/11 8:55 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote: >> 5 6 4 2 3 1 > My vote > 5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2 > From general-return-3747-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:55:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4BCA4EF9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77446 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:55:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77386 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77378 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:55:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:16 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so603286wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:54:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.7.3 with SMTP id z3mr733071wes.68.1308153295247; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:54:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:54:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves wrot= e: > My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6 > > Tom > > > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >> All, >> =A0 =A0We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put= them all >> on a page, here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of v= oting, >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important th= ing is >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you d= on't >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will >> automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > > From general-return-3748-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:58:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3F174011 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88038 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87972 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87964 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:58:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:58:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henry@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:58:07 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so598227iwr.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.61.83 with SMTP id s19mr587377ibh.19.1308153466072; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.243.130 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Henry Robinson Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:57:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517740b62a8313504a5c23604 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517740b62a8313504a5c23604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5 2 1 3 6 4 On 15 June 2011 08:54, Eli Collins wrote: > My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves > wrote: > > My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6 > > > > Tom > > > > > > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > >> All, > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them all > >> on a page, here: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > >> > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, > >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is > >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > >> > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > >> > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't > >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > >> automatically roll over to your next choice. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > >> > > > > > -- Henry Robinson Software Engineer Cloudera 415-994-6679 --001517740b62a8313504a5c23604-- From general-return-3749-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:59:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88E8F408E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92021 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:59:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91913 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91905 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:59:36 +0000 Received: by yic24 with SMTP id 24so493382yic.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.47.5 with SMTP id u5mr994825ybu.118.1308153555084; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:58:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:58:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: X7jWo89HaxukrKBgtdRRsbp8zI0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 15/06/11 03:51, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer =A0wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>> >>>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >>>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >>>> that they are using Hadoop? =A0You've patched Hadoop many times, shoul= d >>>> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? =A0I'm -1 on a >>>> proposal that does this. >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I think there is a big difference between some company t= hat uses >>> Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a >>> distribution for others to use, usually for-profit. >> >> Just as the reminder: this whole conversation has started as a result >> of EMC announcement of 100% compatible version of Apache Hadoop. So, >> Allen's point is right on target here: the above example is simply >> incorrect. > > I seem to recall this dicussion starting a bit earlier, with the whole > notion of compatibility, before EMC got involved. > > Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should= be > finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues. > > also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke > the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache > Hadoop build"? I think such a T-shirt should be forcefully worn on any person who did just that. From general-return-3750-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:04:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57ED6478F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4409 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4347 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4339 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:11 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so640815wwi.29 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.220.213 with SMTP id o63mr2292851wep.98.1308153831501; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:03:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > 4, 2, 6 > > Yes. =A0That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't c= ut > the mustard for various reasons. =A05 is a recycled product logo and I do= n't > think the others make the required visual case. 5 is not a product logo, nor was it. Aaron Nuton contributed this and the Hive logo (which was subsequently adopted) to Apache. See MAPREDUCE-484 and http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/04/hive-and-jobtracker-needed-logos. This logo was used as an icon in Hue (Hadoop user interface) which is an Apache licensed open source project. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3751-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:04:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D44134942 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7053 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6923 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6914 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.90.72] (HELO nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.90.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:04:47 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 16:04:25 -0000 Received: from [98.138.88.234] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 16:04:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 16:04:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 674980.3147.bm@omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 47160 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2011 16:04:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308153859; bh=SrsjQV1FPdUl+tPmCv4gxVdPcT/91T8aTxTJ5Tm4+iw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=u6YEViWMMmw8WiTY7ZTsPzuLyTDb6Uf4KG1JsdZuE/0BXqx2thfjayAH132YJ3MrLFpjuHC4wqQncRZKa5oDIAN5JfZ79NPekvzhcOJvpNjy2jI06S+vGPbdsGyj/XDMn4aGn1RdjpD7eDEj07qO7vozGsXinvy3GHglUEgDExY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5t0C7p3u8gzhQigtXpXsfyrmWatFzOQ/I+jl66zcrlseiGqkKWcJQK6+3xslGsHJxFIPoae/NMZAEaN7neZ2VhjPTGCjS8c9YTREXNTSwI0tc83RMMu74PpVRIisUzQxcBhw6nlxyaWLywK3pyPNZzeRr2bJrYq7Ugyw/tKrsnA=; Message-ID: <548612.46727.qm@web125905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: IWyme9IVM1m7D7hFXL_VZCotTqytBGRiphw7BVaFrjJHcT. 3rrdwGhjTvZ94HFLtklRh6eRC4E3VmwEQ5LUdLIrfC1_rXa8TGcygXKTQi5j 3nnM460GgOXGb4h_x7HnUQtuIICPp8cWSimMYfcIqrqWIfVHwi9muQGmKbaw PhqkCIdWwXxrGyDUUi7v1OEWYJxCaqLqL.QoNg87rofXfNUy6RjHcaU6Gl5s 8EVIFroIKbZCN2.uxT6u25SQLaO9LwPf3T4PmoyGQ2eGgeQWi6iDoe3Gr6W0 Ocv7kgX8HP51Ii4W8ig1TQJZHk48QjLIapQPjztzp.n9bPZgBNRkI5pmrnOQ 4J8Vvkka4_uPrVeycvB.caSr3OiMyOWM6E4hW5t1bD.KTxAwE6puLs94Ib7z 7IVs5HhXejyRpPhrTDzv9._nspN2k7b4OrsVfHo9eislRwH8CyAQnjjbSq2J ejqROdwmbJKRXcCZ7cKyjbyN85Unq.vt1sCzMWWTh.iDJNN4NXcWD22Z_.qZ S Received: from [98.138.83.207] by web125905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:04:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:04:19 -0700 (PDT) From: lohit Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 4,5,6,3,2,1 PS: Powered logo would be advertised by users. Their vote should count :) ----- Original Message ---- From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo All, We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice. -- Owen From general-return-3752-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:20:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745D84984 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46240 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:20:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46182 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:20:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46174 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:20:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:20:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:20:31 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so511079gxk.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.67.41 with SMTP id u41mr1056067ybk.403.1308154810266; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:20:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.205.10 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:19:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:19:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KZtkRzURIAEGio5aEy7ioD9vjMw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have put the votes together in a form of a spreadsheet http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h for the convenience of watching the race. Statistics fascinates me usually. Stay tuned. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3753-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:23:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE0A84C66 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57596 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:23:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57531 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:23:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57496 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:23:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:23:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:23:31 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so662124wwi.29 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.46.21 with SMTP id q21mr2283929web.113.1308154990822; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:23:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:23:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >> that they are using Hadoop? =A0You've patched Hadoop many times, should >> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? =A0I'm -1 on a >> proposal that does this. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I think there is a big difference between some company tha= t uses Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a di= stribution for others to use, usually for-profit. The wiki makes no such distinction. The PMC will apply the rules equally to all parties. According to Owen's email if you are using a release of Apache Hadoop and have applied more than 2 security patches or any backports you are not using Hadoop. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3754-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:39:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 513FB4AFD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 626 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:39:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 514 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:39:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 506 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:39:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:40 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so657886wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:39:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uhZVFSx/hIevn2AsysL18XnxWH80FnZUs8Sz5LVAy3I=; b=eOioNSr2CjrjjaVrXX8FdZbKZ6IKPXr+vj2uqj9Z2R8+kxo+CKcpQi/ftoSb2ToKRr aRRE5G8kedlX33aoqB3omd+r4b2Z/zOStx+t25NJrsj3RVEYfMyZTNPMUjakZoSgrKw2 ZrEfanXrakTFCTlse8NCmL7wU0B2d9LH1K5f0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dRbsxCW93qYUoqhIFxnFg1jhyCW+jin/Nczvuile2+ewkfZE4oeYIF5PBjjvawF/xS iPdj6OYQclkik15SZb7lDXsnwiUcaOAHtWwfeN7eG/4pytssDwq9fagwg0pzkcxlUwvJ c4RhPwjOg9q8qTVkkWlJCDSXrSTAlZ6QnYET8= Received: by 10.216.80.32 with SMTP id j32mr784478wee.91.1308155960098; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:39:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.21 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:39:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:39:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 3 Tom On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3755-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:40:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53F8A4B94 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3655 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:40:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3562 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:40:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3497 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:40:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:40:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:40:40 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so659065wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.46.21 with SMTP id q21mr2302174web.113.1308156019457; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:40:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we >> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. > > Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may b= e called Hadoop. > > There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding Hadoop-ecosy= stem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the different "versio= ns" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the resources or the nec= essary compatibility test suite to test compatibility between the different= sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all = of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) d= ifferent versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apach= e license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of Ha= doop without releasing their source code that would enable verification. > > In summary, > =A01. Hadoop is very successful. > =A02. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use= the Hadoop name. > =A03. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are followi= ng the rules. > =A04. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are com= patible. > =A05. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness betwe= en companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. > > That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security patch= es that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. > I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce this equally across all parties? It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who contribute to and invest in the project. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3756-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6825F4D78 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14958 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14910 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14902 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jnaisbit@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:44:21 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FGhZLp033189 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:35 -0700 From: Jeffrey Naisbitt To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrCzFiLf5EThxpTO6I5LsX1VpvSwAcCxRY Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.10.0.110428 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3 --Jeff On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them= all > on a page, here: >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >=20 > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, > let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng is > to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >=20 > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >=20 > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 >=20 From general-return-3757-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:45:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A18864DBE for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16953 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16877 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16869 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:44:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:44:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:44:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5E1B7E6B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:28 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ne9Rg29SIlqs for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44570B7E65 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:27 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308761054.138@y3ivNxf5U45N+ZSIWN9sTg Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5FGiDqr015469 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:13 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF8E15C.3030802@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:12 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5FGiDqr015469 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15/06/11 17:23, Eli Collins wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >>> that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should >>> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? I'm -1 on a >>> proposal that does this. >> >> I think there is a big difference between some company that uses Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a distribution for others to use, usually for-profit. > > The wiki makes no such distinction. The PMC will apply the rules > equally to all parties. > > According to Owen's email if you are using a release of Apache Hadoop > and have applied more than 2 security patches or any backports you are > not using Hadoop. > > Thanks, > Eli What you do in house is of no concern to the trademarks and PMC people, but naming of public redistributables is -and that's where the confusion of what "a distribution of Apache Hadoop" is, because it's gone from weakly defined to very vague recently, and that needs to be corrected before people are left in a world of confusion. It's been complicated enough with people posting issues related to the Cloudera Distribution including Apache Hadoop, what happens when people start posting EMC-enterprise-hadoopish issues, file bugreps against Brisk's "Hadoop built on other things" product on the apache JIRA? From general-return-3758-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 197124509 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23785 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23729 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeagles@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:24 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so624673pve.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:48:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s7bBDb0yARppO3NUGTwO9q4YnmJ74zgns0J/5O5AFQo=; b=xnmbLqc8yEDHghtfuni3aOlHf/ghpZLG3F3SA70CzfSdjJzRO/Ck700Ou9KzWyJusI yLPJfWW/umsvLj1Cr+R+4VW2tzMs+pKCcYoQpulgCmpqCy+UboJG2qv4ag2oV45T5515 CG9UiyJ3QWukDgeXIToawfc4fe26oTjoeDJkI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yol9YsVg7+kACRsfvyEAwLd3T+j9SYIFND3Vocl+QTsHoLgRNK56ZuT8Ly9XSf+Ilm d0YSRT5SVmAE4hHQmUGAZcdh+Dj+o7OV9O0G5aALl1IXvzribc8YahP0zAQ/WDSqs1uK iYybJFvnw9CIkyfdWvAQ1xcmHfCh2NONw5a8k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.245.16 with SMTP id s16mr196632wfh.139.1308156483865; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.234.4 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:48:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:48:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Jonathan Eagles To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2def2880cb904a5c2ea39 --000e0cd2def2880cb904a5c2ea39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My vote: 2, 4, 5, 6, 3, 1. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --000e0cd2def2880cb904a5c2ea39-- From general-return-3759-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:48:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91D9C452F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25262 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25195 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25186 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:48:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of anupams@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:48:26 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FGling094278 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS08.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.27]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:47:44 -0700 From: Anupam Seth To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:47:43 -0700 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrCzFiLf5EThxpTO6I5LsX1VpvSwAcCxRYAAAYPOA= Message-ID: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My vote: 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3 -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnaisbit@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3 --Jeff On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them= all > on a page, here: >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >=20 > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, > let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng is > to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >=20 > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >=20 > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 >=20 From general-return-3760-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:53:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 842D44713 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42272 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:53:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42222 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42214 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:53:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:53:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dvryaboy@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:53:44 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so693961wwi.29 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+2e75iHGtSruaswMXtm6+QhYi2PgzrgGuaoly+D8k8k=; b=XB/1UyXLARksk1GyNj9eV9rw6r4X8ZDSALZKXQrf0z2DHJHtCpwU5zoq3NxPjRWbDZ D4YhMutUleIg9JrZQHvk2RISA2n/oMkkoYY5ASSOAsQDHNjD3sFZm+or5LIo0rG6o5tA izwvEqIIaVCWI4tL8m0TdbRw3kOn2lBabuqdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UCTJs+/jiEAsJ4JRy7EdULslgyOU8DDZdmM/yovM9QcEM3/JCDqpoE49wh+Pac9H5m gZ68cZi5efwf/yLq6O3VngTTxOaQjvMBD7DBfstk81KhNXSY2s4WGnZiD4eJR19/aTFD ufS2Pedk2xiyU2Dv5FyQDHrIpO0PFk9CxaLN8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.22 with SMTP id q22mr838061wep.37.1308156803769; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.140 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:53:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Dmitriy Ryaboy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2 6 5 1 4 3 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Anupam Seth wrote: > My vote: > > 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnaisbit@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo > > My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3 > --Jeff > > > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >> All, >> =A0 =A0We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put= them all >> on a page, here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of v= oting, >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important th= ing is >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you d= on't >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will >> automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > > From general-return-3761-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA39848EC for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56887 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56826 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56818 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:58:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:58:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:58:20 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so679690wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:57:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.75 with SMTP id r53mr802095wek.98.1308157078642; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:57:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF8E15C.3030802@apache.org> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF8E15C.3030802@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:57:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 15/06/11 17:23, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer =A0wrot= e: >>> >>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>> >>>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >>>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >>>> that they are using Hadoop? =A0You've patched Hadoop many times, shoul= d >>>> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? =A0I'm -1 on a >>>> proposal that does this. >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I think there is a big difference between some company t= hat uses >>> Hadoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a >>> distribution for others to use, usually for-profit. >> >> The wiki makes no such distinction. The PMC will apply the rules >> equally to all parties. >> >> According to Owen's email if you are using a release of Apache Hadoop >> and have applied more than 2 security patches or any backports you are >> not using Hadoop. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > > What you do in house is of no concern to the trademarks and PMC people, b= ut > naming of public redistributables is -and that's where the confusion of w= hat > "a distribution of Apache Hadoop" is, because it's gone from weakly defin= ed > to very vague recently, and that needs to be corrected before people are > left in a world of confusion. > Steve, I'm on the PMC and it is a concern. What happens in house often gets released on github, documented, blogged about, etc. All this stuff creates confusion about the product and is therefore a concern of the PMC. > > It's been complicated enough with people posting issues related to the > Cloudera Distribution including Apache Hadoop, what happens when people > start posting EMC-enterprise-hadoopish issues, file bugreps against Brisk= 's > "Hadoop built on other things" product on the apache JIRA? > The same thing we do today. We point them to another more appropriate forum= . Isn't your proposal w/ the HTTPD/Subversion policy wrt backporting effective? Note that it's pretty strict, you have to get your code committed to a branch that will be released subject to approval by the PMC. It's not saying that anyone can do whatever they want to the Hadoop source and call it Hadoop. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3762-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 16:59:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2208E493C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59590 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:59:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59535 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 16:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59527 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 16:59:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:59:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:59:38 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1044476bwz.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.7.156 with SMTP id d28mr749144bkd.28.1308157157505; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.195 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:58:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517588b5aaefbc704a5c3121e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517588b5aaefbc704a5c3121e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest > in adopting it. > On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the "style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former. I ask because when posting option #5 on the original JIRA, Aaron Newton also posted a variant optimized for very small treatments: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12458850/powered-by-hadoop-small.png -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera --001517588b5aaefbc704a5c3121e-- From general-return-3763-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:22:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDC0F4DAA for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10225 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10178 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10170 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:22:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:22:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paliwalashish@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:22:30 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so742281vxa.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v9m3vWnU9swpFc9f0YcIU5xNYpM4e93EMOEJ9Wkfaa4=; b=hexTngFG5raUlnso9QMpYt+lZr6LY0U+dZomhqr5h2lao000zHiRlg6t5Psbq2U/Ts roCh51C6PgJP2Z9qs6456TPyODa64ZdY4ldNKU3w4SUJq39f1h2ICT1wKXxPDEtRQBH1 +1uQqDuElA/jHI04qtmv1Aq2+0MoMfCjqfP0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JWJvk0YrEU0ehsX1xzTHhnm5ztFNZd/pL3aaW/gnQTTUFlgjo6aTW2KCTUTTdS/ssZ IfnXu8O/LoYyquqy/cCp52Aypxzkipl6KtIX+ALMJ846dqSk/oSklmwfIerapVllxTLw pyLsTiYE4+a5l1l88dufS1s4dSx6D54NhIS9Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.185.8 with SMTP id ey8mr1185649vdc.68.1308158529569; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.106.137 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:22:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Ashish To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54866e277040604a5c3640e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54866e277040604a5c3640e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5, 4, 2, 6 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal --bcaec54866e277040604a5c3640e-- From general-return-3764-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:24:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 000D24E0A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13488 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13425 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13417 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sureshms@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:06 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FHNMOo017195 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:23:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308158602; bh=0dIeAsD0Tl1b948ZwXOkjevHMfQoUksOAvqreHaw9Mw=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=XyGRA6NKoQ9bEI6RDiEwzASw1UGW/JsdXilT8ExvrJQWaM10u2aQXneNEmjRavJkX Gv/Lq/uuPukOIzLcsnDiQva8isiz21lMpqAOnB9baszRJ6GMqO6iiLTL/abpLwsh4N FpRcYvsIDEMsbujx2lEQW4fJyXDSJvMsROIsRgCs= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:23:21 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:23:20 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrCyRCefBbe/cXTJeQuFAwnKvIdwAdcedb Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 4 On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them= all > on a page, here: >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >=20 > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, > let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng is > to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >=20 > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >=20 > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 >=20 From general-return-3765-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:25:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D6014E44 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15014 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14958 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14950 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:24:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:24:50 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so702313iwr.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.82.197 with SMTP id c5mr620502ibl.131.1308158669428; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly7sm573055icb.12.2011.06.15.10.24.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:24:23 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <068A4109-EFA8-467E-B7B9-9F3F56225E74@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt = the > "style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the = former. It is about the style. Technically, it would require a vote to replace = the precise pixels, but usually two alternatives in the same style one = is clearly better and we can make the decision without an explicit vote. -- Owen From general-return-3766-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:31:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D434B46A4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24563 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:31:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24504 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:31:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24496 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:31:24 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:31:22 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so710617iwr.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:31:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.202.144 with SMTP id fe16mr617587ibb.133.1308159082216; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.239.7 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:31:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:31:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Patrick Hunt To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > 2, 4 > > > On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >> All, >> =A0 =A0We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put= them all >> on a page, here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of v= oting, >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important th= ing is >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you d= on't >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will >> automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > > From general-return-3767-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:44:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E89C4BA8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53981 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53866 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53858 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:44:31 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so933366fxm.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.92.154 with SMTP id r26mr18819fam.35.1308159869624; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.100.7 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2, 4, 6. mahadev On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > 5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas > wrote: >> 2, 4 >> >> >> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >> >>> All, >>> =A0 =A0We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've pu= t them all >>> on a page, here: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >>> >>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of = voting, >>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important t= hing is >>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >>> >>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >>> >>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you = don't >>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will >>> automatically roll over to your next choice. >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >>> >> >> > --=20 thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar From general-return-3768-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:45:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7FD24F0D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57393 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:45:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57315 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57300 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:45:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:45:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mattf@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:45:17 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FHiYmk056545; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:34 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:44:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: Acwrg+KNtkiQeg+MSTGAUSS6eqE8/w== Message-ID: <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Eli, you said: > Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the sa= me > category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not > gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who > contribute to and invest in the project. How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and reasonably un= ambiguous for people who are not Hadoop developers? Do the HTTP and Subversion polic= ies draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the specific = text, or=20 copy that text to this thread? Thanks, --Matt On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 >> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we >> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >=20 > Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may b= e called Hadoop. >=20 > There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding Hadoop-ecosy= stem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the different "versio= ns" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the resources or the nec= essary compatibility test suite to test compatibility between the different= sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all = of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) d= ifferent versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apach= e license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of Ha= doop without releasing their source code that would enable verification. >=20 > In summary, > 1. Hadoop is very successful. > 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use t= he Hadoop name. > 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are following= the rules. > 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are compa= tible. > 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness between= companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. >=20 > That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security patch= es that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. >=20 I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce this equally across all parties? It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who contribute to and invest in the project. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3769-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:50:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 037CA429F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62992 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62837 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62829 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:50:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.205] (HELO nm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:50:19 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.190] by nm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 17:49:57 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.168] by tm3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 17:49:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1051.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 17:49:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 743388.17113.bm@omp1051.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 61383 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2011 17:49:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308160197; bh=poikW3J4cHwpfXC743SeO2Y125Vttwq2e+GEAD8pTNc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i0wCOrrgaSUg5IPNHkZ1iIJkEI3wBh1y4hAf8qm9d3+p5UKgkCOKaggdNRBGSzx9UQOX8m6/IIsrCbW4SEuzYK0Fj4QF55i1Z7vDp/G4t3J9k8bF9yohFT8Jc+yftqgnJTJBJ83V1mjSHUSN/csszK0EZKPsgSovMjLZjdbpX0k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OT3dZ/hvyoeVXQjmh7FTOIzlnoUN2Hdx+YYCmfRiDSxoJslpUff0toZTLwfPcEwEVd+I8VopZUznNhgkbnU6Gw/p7bb3zuCW4mizYwD2ZbhYt5WyQALV+5Br/5sKjuX8wXktWuG+wvVhPvh45JVCui425VMbBoAZGP5nP24a5QU=; Message-ID: <635634.55935.qm@web65904.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: o1wt7bMVM1n1_3jooPT_jnYwCsAJLOy7EejOMCWIey9yEJS xMiug90254WeSSMKoSmEod5dSQ_qsCQNJfCOnDfkU15C3sG4RmTTOvyXIIq7 sUMPDrdFcADPkAmKCON0D9ylkkt4q4FFe_5d8aGjlnfQ6Ua_5lCSfW76hm6N GncNgs1lmM9nWL9DYUVGoQ6Q.Lve4aVJp0jud8jfz76CtNtx86Q0VhH4Zntt xK_FsZYShc088dWoer78bd65ih6IiAO7tnZL2isqox_VvEsTKxpb2S87hXFR qR0ktHMuhU1D2A_YP.Dc..W3XkHSDkS74Yj.1viobHLzyhdfKHezNSvCz39C 7quCYaus44zbvINV8dTlCUhTg.cusO0V1jmz4fY7WronTEptFsEUYHklDTcv qCTAfLkwcqMRWMUFcE8lH8Z0Ig_ZMPvx10dw67KUQ2ljRG3WtgRpwPyhBjpY 1FGy3AUSkWxlHrDkZ0DuvfHZmQ4Pc55GqncmiQW7No.NFOMeyRNuwHCxEDaR 0DXXA7arE9zRM4ioOiA-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65904.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:57 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:49:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1523813513-1308160197=:55935" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1523813513-1308160197=:55935 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 4, 2 Regards, Tsz-Wo ________________________________ From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo All, We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice. -- Owen --0-1523813513-1308160197=:55935-- From general-return-3770-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:01:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B56AC4D72 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86779 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:01:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86720 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86705 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:01:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mattf@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:01:07 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FI0LtQ023748; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:00:21 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "trademarks@apache.org" , Matthew Foley Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:00:20 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: AcwrhhbgxJxKg/kTR0aiVqmVkFsFZw== Message-ID: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Oh, and while I can't officially vote, I think this page is extremely well = done and I strongly support it. =20 As an editorial note, however, I would remove the last paragraph in the "Co= mpatibility"=20 section, referencing the email thread (that I contributed to at length :-) = ). =20 That thread went all over the place, and would be misinforming to the typic= al reader. The distillation on this twiki page IS normative and not confusing= , and=20 we should leave it at that. Best, --Matt On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley wrote: Eli, you said: > Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the sa= me > category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not > gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who > contribute to and invest in the project. How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and reasonably un= ambiguous for people who are not Hadoop developers? Do the HTTP and Subversion polic= ies draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the specific = text, or=20 copy that text to this thread? Thanks, --Matt On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 >> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we >> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >=20 > Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may b= e called Hadoop. >=20 > There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding Hadoop-ecosy= stem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the different "versio= ns" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the resources or the nec= essary compatibility test suite to test compatibility between the different= sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all = of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) d= ifferent versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apach= e license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of Ha= doop without releasing their source code that would enable verification. >=20 > In summary, > 1. Hadoop is very successful. > 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use th= e Hadoop name. > 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are following = the rules. > 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are compat= ible. > 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness between = companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. >=20 > That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security patch= es that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. >=20 I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce this equally across all parties? It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who contribute to and invest in the project. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3771-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:14:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A37F040A6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8916 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:14:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8867 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8859 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:14:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:14:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:14:08 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so813123vxa.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:13:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CIuIYSDkCo7Xigkt0HY9ZUNDJiaLU4zbncqwkOQlWN4=; b=ZRGcQ2dtTwAJDE4FVE9dgtfa7C0iDyticLvZKR4o0/TDUf4W9dEol+grkiLgp2gspU sG2BIxEGfzVhb4fCkrylxWX2vwkJ9SkO2TK0ZLY2MCF4PFtUTdCxhQp6k2Cp/DwDFhUW oBl07v3GwELvblvEfg8d+kkLiXqOGM6KG34rY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=W6H+Pes4Ni5xtJA/UK8ZNd9VwQ93rP3WAHr9NYrW+avRy5oDFKBs0NfEvjyHACARuQ IdDKdd9UXPE0yzfI2xQsHTw6FQ5FKcoY2obrEuZCRQ+3y6OfOBlQ2x9FKpwAPpgeRe0r PaMKbELzyGbGeR3G55lClQVUdbxW9Q28mPGcE= Received: by 10.52.98.39 with SMTP id ef7mr66829vdb.88.1308161627201; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:13:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.187.66 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:13:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: trademarks@apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f37ce1921da04a5c41ddc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307f37ce1921da04a5c41ddc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 to what Eli says. If nobody is running official Hadoop according to this definition, but everybody thinks that they are running hadoop, then this definition is a bit out of whack. The source of the dissonance is related to the fact that release just don't happen often enough in Hadoop. In addition, I think that the limitations on usage are too strict. For instance, if "QuickBooks for Windows" [1] doesn't cause Microsoft to sue Intuit, then "Joe's Foo for Apache Hadoop" really shouldn't cause any more grief. So I would give a (non-binding) -1 to the policy as stated. [1] http://quickbooks.intuit.com/product/accounting_software/windows_financial_management_software.jsp On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we > >> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that > >> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. > > > > Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may > be called Hadoop. > > > > There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding > Hadoop-ecosystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the > different "versions" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the > resources or the necessary compatibility test suite to test compatibility > between the different sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time > to ensure that all of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of > the many (10? 15?) different versions have been committed to trunk. > Futhermore, under the Apache license, a company Foo could claim that it is a > cherry pick version of Hadoop without releasing their source code that would > enable verification. > > > > In summary, > > 1. Hadoop is very successful. > > 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use > the Hadoop name. > > 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are following > the rules. > > 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are > compatible. > > 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness between > companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. > > > > That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security > patches that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. > > > > I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of > anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By > this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, > including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is > that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce > this equally across all parties? > > It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop > need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote > on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a > build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same > category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not > gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who > contribute to and invest in the project. > > Thanks, > Eli > --20cf307f37ce1921da04a5c41ddc-- From general-return-3772-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:22:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA8B248FA for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34410 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:22:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34341 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34329 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:22:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:22:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:22:11 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so782091wwi.29 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mChKf+1vJq5ndVXFvVLB4XkwY8ETHOUTDOon9ngDu+8=; b=PhADrl9mq0jvlNSLvOgngORqbKMtChaXL15GlRIFsC0K4EGkXx3/FbeZLoIf7s+uMu NGA46SBYHYXB0qpnbwu8XFRPmC1FnqcGtcv3YD9WOMt3Q7wb/jt5B5HpX4trLdpcXUHD CMnsig5Lmg4pzNrvXkazBsIHw84CkTxxt3Pt0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QF0/oz8sVumuX1H5zkI/Ete9rS8ZsV8HLpI1efM8WJ11GqDq7DIpc7OGGkSgKLgxN5 Rv2IQrcwgsTA1q2I1Gbuw93YbOj5XMdKbDWiC94vjaa+y1RDWgtu6QmULYxc1Lew61K2 syJzCxPKEsPwYqA6ZFohGEgC7kh17s1qO9c/U= Received: by 10.217.5.130 with SMTP id w2mr2441239wes.61.1308162111217; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.21 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> From: Tom White Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:21:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No offense taken. Sanjay and I chatted offline. We disagree on whether Private should be scoped to the whole project (Hadoop), or to subprojects (Common, HDFS, MapReduce). The intent of HADOOP-5073 was for the latter, but I'm not convinced it buys us anything really, which is why I've been arguing for the former. However, what we have at the moment in the javadoc is misleading, so that at least needs clearing up via HADOOP-7391. Thanks for doing this Sanjay. I do think (and I think Sanjay agrees with me here) we should move away from LimitedPrivate access for external projects by creating public APIs that we are prepared to support (note again that they may be Evolving or even Unstable) - either by marking existing (Limited)Private APIs as public, or by creating a new API. We should do this for the 6 cases I highlighted earlier in the thread. Cheers, Tom On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote: > >> >> >> >> -1 >> I disagree with the proposed changes. >> ..... >> I will post a longer email explaining my position and my -1 more >> clearly after I have had a chance to read all the emails carefully. >> >> >> sanjay > > Please don't take my -1 too strongly. > It was NOT meant to be offensive. I saw a lot of +1s and wanted to make s= ure > that this doesn't turn into a jira and a commit in =A0few days. > > sanjay From general-return-3773-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:23:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3ECE74962 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37608 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37547 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37539 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:23:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:23:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jameswarren3@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:23:10 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so625210gxk.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:22:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=lz+qzbOzs2uCBdu28wJE5fFQg5oPoQCSa9J8vjx572k=; b=I9X/igIhjgl4BD9wOwlLpGdsTEzHB50Ft+pwouS4xJa46zgXyN1neGVy5JR78QnBVf e5skk0/3YQy6nrmo6bd5kqz8b6zaVCphowqf298kdvnSD0wEuQ2wVq6bFctw6FsnKjUU UYwiHIJ+J0xET9ytmq2EMq7EqYezhT9LcLEYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=KuTPyQgS8CLZFKelAuFzzdC/6A+0geXLwzG2pD1/kyDXNUNS7xp57P2Gx/ZfqGijbk SdSxiEnKbAA9pgOrLBxBlJHzAXMUqsX60K+vP/pFSvHYK+cpQtXj9hbCzgrsBsgwHomr rTd2pP8+rK2OOjnwpi/EAT5qIhGfBbKqd/Ykw= Received: by 10.236.154.233 with SMTP id h69mr107691yhk.84.1308162169393; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:22:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: james.warren@stanfordalumni.org Sender: jameswarren3@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.153.228 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:22:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: James Warren Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:22:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Royv0_AqDARcRAD0Q1i_xoXLxyI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f69c26a52b804a5c43d22 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303f69c26a52b804a5c43d22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --20cf303f69c26a52b804a5c43d22-- From general-return-3774-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:24:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 672AE499F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40447 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40299 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40290 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:24:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:24:02 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so826063vxa.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.72.230 with SMTP id g6mr61771vdv.163.1308162221051; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [82.105.90.90] In-Reply-To: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> References: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:23:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bigtop Proposal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec50160117e8f6404a5c4400f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec50160117e8f6404a5c4400f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom > White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build and > testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to have > coordinated releases. > I will comment on the proposal directly as well, but coordinated releases would be a disaster. Mahout, for one, should not have to wait for Hadoop to have a release. We are already unhappy that we only get two releases a year and want to up that to four. Much better is to have a directed acyclic dependency graph with coherent versioning. That allows projects to stay independent, but still express version requirements. > -It might make sense for the hadoop, pig, hive, hama, mahout, hbase &c > committers to all have access to this, so that they can help evolve the > packaging and functional tests. > > Multi-project access sounds right. --bcaec50160117e8f6404a5c4400f-- From general-return-3775-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:38:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA86F439E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71607 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71527 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71514 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:38:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:38:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of acm@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.9] (vpn-client-104-2.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.104.2]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5FIbrLE078494; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:37:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308163075; bh=Do/D17BehTXvh7KMgE2zEKOP+nf5EsBnQHxRB+iU8ZM=; h=Cc:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version: Subject:Date:References; b=q6/I80Deppk3EZ6PV3M5rtWiu/ZG1U7sFkBJaoixURSuQu7fdKKkRc8OIHjt+vZEa GrcjK5qii+lNjnLXtal+P+TkOTQsiAzE5zbBQ2yGHIN8IbcM1oD3oSSuU0zHfL0qJZ C6Q6EAGhFDBUBhzuRGFK//02j83yoNGosPCh9m9c= Cc: "trademarks@apache.org" Message-Id: <3E913938-C23D-42DA-8A85-B89298AB09BA@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-27--856608964 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:07:52 +0530 References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-27--856608964 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of > anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By > this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, > including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is > that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce > this equally across all parties? This is only a recent (less than 2 yrs) phenomenon with hadoop-0.20 onwards. I've been on the project for over 5 years now and I've run official Apache Hadoop releases at Y! for the majority of that time. From hadoop-0.1 to hadoop-0.18. IAC, getting everyone to run an official release isn't an anti-goal. And, as Steve points out, this really doesn't concern internal deployments - public redistributables is something I worry about as a PMC member with my Apache hat on. +1 for the current version (Defining Hadoop (last edited 2011-06-09 02:56:39 by OwenOMalley) thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-27--856608964-- From general-return-3776-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:45:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6980F481F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89864 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89786 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89778 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:45:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:45:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcsrivas@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:45:12 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so770622pve.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BAVSLC7AEy8kk6rM1A1mkZWQe+MINGx3NrpdwmmB7nU=; b=mq8FGW8wEW+9yOQucNzpQymXy/58ECSDghfIouc6Ix+b8Yed5DfnmIbe6KbgaDEo+K NKaCDuVykZ+dI/3dgFmzBEtYI4ssn1uGBcCwyxOo2K3aHqNFX9LjnMxSwZm2dKJe1H45 kNYwVPe5wGpHbDDIWK0NVk1vwSvbu8hp5mCLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cj9NOmXSB/p4hpKEM/a3Nz/FZ73pHY5lRZcUn85AbxHodeMSgsqbN5tH5nLFV/0R5j ziCQDhsixG2R9W4dW4p/Ta8ZmjMaz0GTsTIrWqz0R2BDeE8RPZjE5JHiJL8Ka21jqCND H3NWgLGmzAET7Sctfc2mtzEjmSHSlTaMs0GEo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.2.1 with SMTP id 1mr94571pbq.102.1308163492368; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.48.201 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:44:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: "M. C. Srivas" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52158d345528404a5c48c1a --bcaec52158d345528404a5c48c1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren < james.warren@stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6 > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > --bcaec52158d345528404a5c48c1a-- From general-return-3777-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:47:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71D734344 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92469 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92414 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57610 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 07:37:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bbc@bbcn.name designates 209.85.160.66 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:36:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Bochun Bai To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > My vote: > > 5,4,3,2,6,1 > > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4. > From general-return-3778-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:54:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09D024F37 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5983 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5864 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5799 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:54:24 +0000 Received: by yic24 with SMTP id 24so655244yic.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=GWunHiBxoU3GkYH/8YhdVcg04uiJG5E+zbdyZ69+KL0=; b=kEx8iqm7ZsbJmBR0rgrSj5gKy7VvYeKBshP8feV/UyCoIlBJfPwQn6+HfH61na4qc7 oS/MPlbl2tf2h/t7CPm1dXv+OPRby8l4ZRWJ0fV0X/ywzdFsXVEVYJEzKPZcEc8FLli4 LwPeLBJ40TJwt/aTmCB/7C2ibtHjbreLNXRwI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=qqbrNihSjsAjperIPgppS0p9zjfakU9LPRVvehfOLeL3dvKMFT0xUh9bgSscGcWkkV 9lsI9uZe7TL74W/pD4ohgZmP2soxIWmqPuMQ3VAinZKfq8r/YgModtHkyIuxb/W04X5Z mF1/6A6KdjKhKVt/dAZjPRFEMce7BH4YGfO3w= Received: by 10.150.210.6 with SMTP id i6mr86318ybg.311.1308164043099; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.220.6 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:53:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:53:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Meetup Announcement: July 2011 SF HUG (7/13/2011) To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3561818ce0004a5c4adca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3561818ce0004a5c4adca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, Last week we held another successful San Francisco Hadoop "unconference" meetup at RichRelevance's office. Discussion topics included: * Working with multiple Hadoop clusters * HBase * Hive SerDes and evolving data formats * Zookeeper and Leader Election * Timeseries databases / statistics * Hadoop internals * Hadoop Pipes * Hive performance with Joins * Pig + Java * Avro We will hold next month's meetup on Wednesday July 13, from 6--8pm. This meetup will be hosted once again by our friends at CBSi. Their office is at 235 Second Street. As usual, we will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. It's never too early to start brainstorming topics if you'd like to lead a session -- send me an email off-list if you want to discuss an idea. Event schedule: * 6pm - Welcome * 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda * Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready * 8pm - Conclusion Food and refreshments will be provided, courtesy of CBSi. I hope to see you there! Please RSVP at http://bit.ly/kLpLQR so we can get an accurate count for food and beverages. Cheers, - Aaron Kimball --000e0cd3561818ce0004a5c4adca-- From general-return-3779-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:55:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B3E44FBF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15048 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:55:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14996 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14988 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:55:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:55:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:55:36 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1211118bwz.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.114.144 with SMTP id e16mr52369bkq.119.1308164114399; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:55:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bsolowiej@maprtech.com Received: by 10.204.66.200 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:54:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Bartosz Solowiej Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:54:43 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nAs9FOLpyPdvLwC0gA-6kvFNFu4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e2ae858c01704a5c4b1bd --0016368e2ae858c01704a5c4b1bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2, 4 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai wrote: > 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3 > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > > My vote: > > > > 5,4,3,2,6,1 > > > > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant > in 4. > > > --0016368e2ae858c01704a5c4b1bd-- From general-return-3780-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:58:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A71794099 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23764 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23712 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23704 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:58:15 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so815966iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.81.83 with SMTP id w19mr66756ibk.34.1308164273485; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.146] (h-64-105-168-204.snvacaid.static.covad.net [64.105.168.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s9sm367707ibe.27.2011.06.15.11.57.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DF900AC.5070506@maprtech.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:57:48 -0700 From: Peter Conrad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Bartosz Solowiej Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 On 06/15/2011 11:54 AM, Bartosz Solowiej wrote: > 2, 4 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai wrote: > >> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3 >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: >>> My vote: >>> >>> 5,4,3,2,6,1 >>> >>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant >> in 4. From general-return-3781-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:59:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 341B840F8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28201 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28111 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28103 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:59:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:59:12 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1215486bwz.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:58:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.169.130 with SMTP id z2mr48682bky.137.1308164331654; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.53.68 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:58:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:58:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Subhash Gopinath To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4, 2, 6 From general-return-3782-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 19:02:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A30764BCD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37469 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:02:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37396 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:02:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37382 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:02:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:02:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:01:53 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so823982wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7t9lejXA6uafHGgtudY8x8iFUqmkUp540JqEHXRkfvE=; b=wQlfXR9t2OvW52gvh4Nnclkpel8VL+Loz/b0nCrRy9PuOBkYEKS+ejlINoGK2NNQdb HL3EP0vWTnj+TjKEsRJb9RJ2UvrezJ7KIJDrWFPgjTliDJfxVg4UpRNAiH8NYUHJuKpa xf6RP5B/xPlch/Smi1rGe5zMP/SkJngCMIvQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MveMYdnTM4vWTiekzEsiozmF5yMCSHELeIjYPmGLvwVRm6DaBUgd6yU63ZjTRP3k/X zMkYMFvxPzcFekFWeovTxK3zYxYgfWdm6qOEBjaQrTgf2DIkuYT1Y+FfHCfi61S0cj03 DUifaje3u8fNZxDJF1Qgze44UmrriqOOzipzc= Received: by 10.216.229.3 with SMTP id g3mr14890weq.91.1308164493155; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.21 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:01:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bigtop Proposal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Ted Dunning wrote= : > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote= : > >> For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom >> White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build= and >> testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to have >> coordinated releases. >> > > I will comment on the proposal directly as well, but coordinated releases > would be a disaster. =A0Mahout, for one, should not have to wait for Hado= op to > have a release. =A0We are already unhappy that we only get two releases a= year > and want to up that to four. > > Much better is to have a directed acyclic dependency graph with coherent > versioning. =A0That allows projects to stay independent, but still expres= s > version requirements. I agree. Bigtop would use the releases that the upstream projects have made - it cannot impose new requirements on them like coordinated releases. Any bugs that are uncovered would be submitted to the upstream project, for release there. I'm going to clarify the text in the proposal on this. Thanks for pointing it out Ted. Cheers, Tom > > > >> =A0-It might make sense for the hadoop, pig, hive, hama, mahout, hbase &= c >> committers to all have access to this, so that they can help evolve the >> packaging and functional tests. >> >> > Multi-project access sounds right. > From general-return-3783-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 19:12:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E5B04C4A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70885 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:12:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70808 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:12:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40269 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:02:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:02:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Powered by Logo Vote From: Richa Khandelwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e687b6d2baf85804a5c4c996 --0016e687b6d2baf85804a5c4c996 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 Thanks, Richa --0016e687b6d2baf85804a5c4c996-- From general-return-3784-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 19:19:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C6D4219 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84394 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:19:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84337 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:19:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84329 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:19:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:19:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:19:27 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so674779ywk.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.192.228 with SMTP id i64mr217905yhn.111.1308165546185; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.208.105 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:19:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Chun Chang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30563ed7b0139b04a5c5062b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30563ed7b0139b04a5c5062b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2,4,6,1,3,5 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > 4, 2, 6, 1 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren < > james.warren@stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > > > 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6 > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > > > All, > > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them > > > all on a page, here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your > vote > > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > --20cf30563ed7b0139b04a5c5062b-- From general-return-3785-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 20:26:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5E1B41BF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26884 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 20:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26842 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 20:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15360 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 20:23:43 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:23:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: 2 4 6 5 3 1 From: Dave Jespersen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636af00acfdab9a04a5c5eb5a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636af00acfdab9a04a5c5eb5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2 4 6 5 3 1 --001636af00acfdab9a04a5c5eb5a-- From general-return-3786-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 20:56:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4756B4952 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74867 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 20:56:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74698 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 20:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74681 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 20:56:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:56:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:55:54 +0000 Received: from [172.16.106.57] (vpn-dc-nat.crs4.it [156.148.160.116]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE00879011A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DF92A08.8010106@crs4.it> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:54:16 +0200 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I only like 4. A more polished version would be great. Maybe with "Hadoop" instead of "Apache Hadoop". And maybe with a different font :) On 06/15/11 16:35, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > >> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4. > > Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in adopting it. > > -- Owen -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-3787-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:26:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2506E4A51 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96120 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:26:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95933 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95925 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:26:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:18 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so987048wwi.29 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.75 with SMTP id r53mr115919wek.98.1308176757854; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3E913938-C23D-42DA-8A85-B89298AB09BA@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <3E913938-C23D-42DA-8A85-B89298AB09BA@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:25:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "trademarks@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, =A0I am not aware of >> anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By >> this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, >> including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. =A0Is >> that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce >> this equally across all parties? > > This is only a recent (less than 2 yrs) phenomenon with hadoop-0.20 onwar= ds. > > I've been on the project for over 5 years now and I've run official Apach= e > Hadoop releases at Y! for the majority of that time. From hadoop-0.1 to > hadoop-0.18. But Yahoo! hasn't. According to this wiki YDH (0.20.100) would *not* be considered Apache Hadoop. For example see HADOOP-6962 which refers to 0.20.9, an internal Yahoo! release, not an official Apache release. Are you really comfortable saying Yahoo! doesn't run Hadoop? Thanks, Eli From general-return-3788-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:42:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAE56442C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26878 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:42:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26720 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26705 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:42:37 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:42:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:42:37 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so1055627iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:42:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.84.3 with SMTP id h3mr134859ibl.109.1308177756831; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.133 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:42:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <3E913938-C23D-42DA-8A85-B89298AB09BA@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:42:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Chris Douglas To: trademarks@apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > But Yahoo! hasn't. =A0According to this wiki YDH (0.20.100) would *not* > be considered Apache Hadoop. For example see HADOOP-6962 which refers > to 0.20.9, an internal Yahoo! release, not an official Apache release. > Are you really comfortable saying Yahoo! doesn't run Hadoop? This conclusion does not follow. The guidelines prohibit companies from distributing that software as "Hadoop". It takes no position on whether a company that modifies a release of Apache Hadoop for its deployment credits the project. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Ted Dunning wrote= : > In addition, I think that the limitations on usage are too strict. =A0For > instance, if "QuickBooks for Windows" [1] doesn't cause Microsoft to sue > Intuit, then "Joe's Foo for Apache Hadoop" really shouldn't cause any mor= e > grief. This analogy is also inexact. QuickBooks is an application running on Windows, not a replacement for it. -C From general-return-3789-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:11:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04DF44B31 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80563 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:11:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80360 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:11:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80251 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:11:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:11:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:11:28 +0000 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so1183234wwk.5 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:11:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.7.3 with SMTP id z3mr160487wes.68.1308179466730; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:11:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <3E913938-C23D-42DA-8A85-B89298AB09BA@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:11:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> But Yahoo! hasn't. =A0According to this wiki YDH (0.20.100) would *not* >> be considered Apache Hadoop. For example see HADOOP-6962 which refers >> to 0.20.9, an internal Yahoo! release, not an official Apache release. >> Are you really comfortable saying Yahoo! doesn't run Hadoop? > > This conclusion does not follow. The guidelines prohibit companies > from distributing that software as "Hadoop". It takes no position on > whether a company that modifies a release of Apache Hadoop for its > deployment credits the project. > This is independent of distribution. The guideline clearly defines such an artifact as a "derivative work" and states that "Products that are derivative works of Apache Hadoop are not Apache Hadoop". Therefore it's false for the company to claim they are using Apache Hadoop. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3790-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:35:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5A544BD2 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65688 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65635 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65627 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:35:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:35:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of toddp@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:35:33 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5G0YxMu054739 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:59 -0700 From: Todd Papaioannou To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrvThT+GJ3rC4KQtSgW1zj+stQJw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 4, 5, 3, 6, 1 From general-return-3791-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:40:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 617EF4C68 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72834 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:39:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72787 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72779 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:39:58 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:39:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:39:58 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so1152048iym.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:39:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.139 with SMTP id b11mr206048ibl.134.1308184797994; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.133 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:39:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:39:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My vote: 2, 4, 5 -C On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3792-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:48:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAC5443CF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84602 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84550 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84542 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu does not designate 169.229.218.147 as permitted sender) Received: from [169.229.218.147] (HELO cm06fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.218.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:19 +0000 Received: from [12.201.122.245] (helo=[131.106.56.249]) by cm06fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:matei@eecs.berkeley.edu) (envelope-from ) id 1QX0kX-0006KZ-Kl for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:47:58 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Matei Zaharia In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:47:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5249CC1F-242E-450A-BA7B-79233D62D300@eecs.berkeley.edu> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 1 On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > My vote: 2, 4, 5 >=20 > -C >=20 > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley = wrote: >> All, >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them all on a page, here: >>=20 >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >>=20 >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round = of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important = thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >>=20 >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >>=20 >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, = you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your = vote will automatically roll over to your next choice. >>=20 >> -- Owen >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3793-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:58:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2ACF462C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1183 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:58:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1116 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1108 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:58:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:58:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:58:11 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so870112yxd.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WJqOd/G0S6Xr/yaTOOld60Fj3upSk4p9xPaQHlgsydY=; b=JkTv+sx4S0AZwxJZokzdsI4TyhgNOn1qUFkck3hrS1UAemQ6CaGG6UvJn+W6Zwvb1t HskcvyI/h/asO/cfZ+jUXwUQxcCJF1A7cygpLVlTjrB8wyWXDK58KGxfAleQWztcBNCy TFcRlGDq8jm7kJqDKx05TuC1JdKYLGH/Vpv1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=i1bF+fe1O2ivbNB3n6Ol9PwqWJXmPs623DzwU1DtTMMV608ty7OhVpV9vvrFk6oGAy BGDvxdeuGp5ZiXpTPGo6KZl++RgkZCBGd8LxrGVcbaeL4/r1djCasMTjaJvDZYs0QiSr DWfLzIyAEjuatRlCNvRgb0/Cb5dLCGSUtXyLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.5.13 with SMTP id h13mr335799ybi.144.1308185870573; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:57:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.113.16 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:57:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:57:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4b3c01d9f1c04a5c9c27f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd4b3c01d9f1c04a5c9c27f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It should look something like this: http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3 I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. Thanks, --Konstantin On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --000e0cd4b3c01d9f1c04a5c9c27f-- From general-return-3794-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:03:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9B5F47D7 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4740 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4681 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4673 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:03:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:03:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:03:14 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1106738wyb.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.231.89 with SMTP id k67mr207866weq.113.1308186173253; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:02:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley wrote= : > Eli, you said: >> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the s= ame >> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who >> contribute to and invest in the project. > > How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and reasonably = unambiguous > for people who are not Hadoop developers? =A0Do the HTTP and Subversion p= olicies > draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the specifi= c text, or > copy that text to this thread? > I'll try to find it, this was told to me verbally a while back. Maybe Roy can chime in. Since there seems to be some confusion around distribution we should make this explicit. Some people are currently interpreting the guidelines to say that if you patch an Apache Hadoop release yourself then you're still running Apache Hadoop. But if a vendor patches Apache Hadoop for you then you're not running Apache Hadoop. How about if a subcontractor patches Apache Hadoop for you, then is it Apache Hadoop? This isn't sustainable. Thanks, Eli > Thanks, > --Matt > > > On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> >> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >>> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we >>> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >>> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >> >> Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may = be called Hadoop. >> >> There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding Hadoop-ecos= ystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the different "versi= ons" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the resources or the ne= cessary compatibility test suite to test compatibility between the differen= t sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all= of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) = different versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apac= he license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of H= adoop without releasing their source code that would enable verification. >> >> In summary, >> =A01. Hadoop is very successful. >> =A02. There are many different commercial products that are trying to us= e the Hadoop name. >> =A03. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are follow= ing the rules. >> =A04. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are co= mpatible. >> =A05. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness betw= een companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. >> >> That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security patc= hes that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. >> > > I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, =A0I am not aware of > anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By > this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, > including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. =A0Is > that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce > this equally across all parties? > > It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop > need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote > on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a > build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same > category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not > gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who > contribute to and invest in the project. > > Thanks, > Eli > > From general-return-3795-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:09:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C56B4D9A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12460 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12399 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12391 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:09:02 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so875250yxd.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.207.17 with SMTP id e17mr324137ybg.243.1308186521132; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.158.15 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yS1gGgFi_3w5aLBj4Dh8wawXXMY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man! It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here! -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko w= rote: > It should look something like this: > http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40= OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg > > But given the choices: =A06 2 4 5 1 3 > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : > >> All, >> =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put th= em >> all on a page, here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> -- Owen >> >> >> > From general-return-3796-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EB4A4259 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16957 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16832 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13917 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:09:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of anew@yahoo-inc.com) From: Andreas Neumann To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:27 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: Acwrwedb5iIVAdakRXG1zmWhSuDRXg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2 4 5 6 1 3 From general-return-3797-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:19:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E65B040A9 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18822 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18770 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:19:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18762 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:19:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:19:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mattf@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:19:25 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5G1HcUe068922; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:37 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: Eli Collins , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: Acwrwy2suOVxJO+0S22r6Lb08blubA== Message-ID: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that=20 * applying a small-number-of-patches that are * for high-severity-bug-fixes, and * have been Apache-Hadoop-committed=20 to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a "derived work= ".=20 However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be meaningfu= lly=20 correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably has become a derived work. But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? That's why= I'd like to see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an example. Thanks, --Matt On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley wrote= : > Eli, you said: >> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the s= ame >> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who >> contribute to and invest in the project. >=20 > How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and reasonably = unambiguous > for people who are not Hadoop developers? Do the HTTP and Subversion pol= icies > draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the specifi= c text, or > copy that text to this thread? >=20 I'll try to find it, this was told to me verbally a while back. Maybe Roy can chime in. Since there seems to be some confusion around distribution we should make this explicit. Some people are currently interpreting the guidelines to say that if you patch an Apache Hadoop release yourself then you're still running Apache Hadoop. But if a vendor patches Apache Hadoop for you then you're not running Apache Hadoop. How about if a subcontractor patches Apache Hadoop for you, then is it Apache Hadoop? This isn't sustainable. Thanks, Eli > Thanks, > --Matt >=20 >=20 > On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >>=20 >> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>=20 >>> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we >>> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >>> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >>=20 >> Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases may = be called Hadoop. >>=20 >> There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding Hadoop-ecos= ystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the different "versi= ons" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the resources or the ne= cessary compatibility test suite to test compatibility between the differen= t sets of cherry picked patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all= of the 1,000's of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) = different versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apac= he license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of H= adoop without releasing their source code that would enable verification. >>=20 >> In summary, >> 1. Hadoop is very successful. >> 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to use = the Hadoop name. >> 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are followin= g the rules. >> 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are comp= atible. >> 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness betwee= n companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called Hadoop. >>=20 >> That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security patc= hes that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. >>=20 >=20 > I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of > anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By > this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, > including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is > that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce > this equally across all parties? >=20 > It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop > need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to vote > on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting a > build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same > category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not > gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who > contribute to and invest in the project. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 >=20 From general-return-3798-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:30:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A78F44997 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:30:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22369 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22359 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:30:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:30:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:30:46 +0000 Received: by yic24 with SMTP id 24so887883yic.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Lm0f4kUFo80BOjRLnV335BDD+lgBlf6NsHbuH+QfULg=; b=Co1fbKYTM5T4/BZlyom38Ims5D5qIVG5rZUPSNskyZgfAeS8U/yYS/uhnOwRyKibGB pdh+D63/98Jgr4l6p49sz1Gc1rRX18mcsIyk594Zl2UeGcPX9i0djj5PIFvxYKis3mZ0 uVcb3OQST8cKKyRm47g2nVN7gWK96eoCVBpRA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=B2eiAD8M6F4zfR+u0giyFQjhQfjxsAm++hxq5ET3kr5DBgQd+jIpVkVvQuumaZqnTt fQVp3AYK2tDh0UH2vH/ax1mIpfHifBUZSh+fYCedRlOkwEGQT2U5TL/vBhqEmz5n8lbz nio6rriBjh2P0dXsGpMk+6a1dcFZOsqEhOSD4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.33 with SMTP id r21mr342799yhm.11.1308187825433; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.113.16 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b0a5ea26bfd04a5ca3688 --20cf305b0a5ea26bfd04a5ca3688 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop. The feather would classy on that background too. And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop. --Konstantin On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man! > > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here! > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > It should look something like this: > > > http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg > > > > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3 > > > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. > > > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > >> All, > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > >> all on a page, here: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > >> > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > >> > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > >> > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > >> > >> > > > --20cf305b0a5ea26bfd04a5ca3688-- From general-return-3799-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:48:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCD6E445B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41022 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:48:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40945 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:48:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40937 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:48:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:48:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kengoodhope@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:48:20 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1246690vws.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=X6GDRqwvnulNLZvH4XgefUI1LRr4vnv3HjZj6YAMhF0=; b=WkzenW77OiRkI6VO7wzBVLvDYFCi5MjHf32dLPA5KKkHybRnULHQk7RkPSZnKK1R5h zLQ0FNBaXLiTwedJvcY2m88/R8JJsEobXPVSfOQwvEa+bYaeHtz9jdbz46iEmb8dKhmK zgdl9iynLoMeQIHjImJMZJlt7LiURerjuGm+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FPfFxN8WeEQ+B6JaEEb1SIlS7T0Kbu+Y1zesz4LwerwDhOj/Ms01XYdMkT86MocD02 lVJIsguCQ8cR+vo3Ow2vpJzMNr4BXIp2oqmu5yYJODHgGO1vIF9HgkkPgPXFvwId2W5k iGw1mkRkMnK4mYb8dPR6f+xpsg1H9gO++88bk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.132 with SMTP id cm4mr438359vdb.266.1308188879047; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.185.102 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:47:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:47:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Ken Goodhope To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f33586f4a9304a5ca759b --20cf307f33586f4a9304a5ca759b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 6,2,4 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop. > The feather would classy on that background too. > And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop. > --Konstantin > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho > > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man! > > > > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their > > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here! > > -- > > Take care, > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko > > > wrote: > > > It should look something like this: > > > > > > http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg > > > > > > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3 > > > > > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. > > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > > wrote: > > > > > >> All, > > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them > > >> all on a page, here: > > >> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > >> > > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > >> > > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > >> > > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your > vote > > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > >> > > >> -- Owen > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --20cf307f33586f4a9304a5ca759b-- From general-return-3800-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 02:25:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1E8B62F1 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69358 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69300 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65111 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 02:20:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of craig.russell@oracle.com designates 148.87.113.121 as permitted sender) From: Craig L Russell To: trademarks@apache.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> Message-Id: <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:19:08 -0700 Cc: Eli Collins , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Matthew Foley X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Source-IP: rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4DF96828.0076:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Matthew, I'm sorry I have to disagree. If you change a bit in a work, it becomes a derived work. There's no "demotion" involved. Just a definition of derived work. There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer what the PMC has voted on. It's a derived work. The rules for voting in Apache require that if you change a bit in an artifact, you can no longer count votes for the previous artifact. Because the new work is different. A new vote is required. Not gray. Black and white. Simple as that. Craig P.S. for the anthropologists, look at the history of Apache Derby and Sun JavaDB. Meaningful, specific example. On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Matthew Foley wrote: > I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that > * applying a small-number-of-patches that are > * for high-severity-bug-fixes, and > * have been Apache-Hadoop-committed > to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a > "derived work". > However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be > meaningfully > correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably has > become a derived work. > > But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? > That's why I'd like to > see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an > example. > > Thanks, > --Matt > > > On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley inc.com> wrote: >> Eli, you said: >>> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into >>> the same >>> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >>> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people >>> who >>> contribute to and invest in the project. >> >> How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and >> reasonably unambiguous >> for people who are not Hadoop developers? Do the HTTP and >> Subversion policies >> draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the >> specific text, or >> copy that text to this thread? >> > > I'll try to find it, this was told to me verbally a while back. Maybe > Roy can chime in. > > Since there seems to be some confusion around distribution we should > make this explicit. Some people are currently interpreting the > guidelines to say that if you patch an Apache Hadoop release yourself > then you're still running Apache Hadoop. But if a vendor patches > Apache Hadoop for you then you're not running Apache Hadoop. How about > if a subcontractor patches Apache Hadoop for you, then is it Apache > Hadoop? This isn't sustainable. > > Thanks, > Eli >> Thanks, >> --Matt >> >> >> On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> >>>> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I >>>> think we >>>> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >>>> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >>> >>> Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache >>> releases may be called Hadoop. >>> >>> There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding >>> Hadoop-ecosystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about >>> the different "versions" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't >>> have the resources or the necessary compatibility test suite to >>> test compatibility between the different sets of cherry picked >>> patches. We also don't have time to ensure that all of the 1,000's >>> of patches applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) >>> different versions have been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under >>> the Apache license, a company Foo could claim that it is a cherry >>> pick version of Hadoop without releasing their source code that >>> would enable verification. >>> >>> In summary, >>> 1. Hadoop is very successful. >>> 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to >>> use the Hadoop name. >>> 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are >>> following the rules. >>> 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are >>> compatible. >>> 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness >>> between companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be >>> called Hadoop. >>> >>> That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of >>> security patches that haven't been released yet doesn't seem >>> unreasonable. >>> >> >> I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of >> anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). >> By >> this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, >> including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is >> that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to enforce >> this equally across all parties? >> >> It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop >> need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to >> vote >> on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. >> Putting a >> build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same >> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people >> who >> contribute to and invest in the project. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> > Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation Chair, OpenJPA PMC clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo From general-return-3801-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 02:43:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6380C6A4F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83077 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:43:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82995 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82984 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 02:43:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:43:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:43:07 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so1300054vxa.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f5N31Pg6jmWqc6hIHX/D9wLZDu+I4YPITUQB51NiFAw=; b=vydTt+libV+cNL2Orz3wy7nrJDBv+FTM8BzlXCvSBw1d05isdEizpNRi7tdR9+nyBs rmJOE33tFlhuLvhAStU81KRHCn652kJzlMWY82JaJ7ApWiyp2OLqSsmoF8/gKDTeFgNp EZ6NDxHKsM7CltT6WmdedTKdSjkhiKqvFv4XQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uw51sSSDz5YclIPJ+A/Icz/rPrKZqnPmT7hMUeDa3+XdAW2pNkhxfRKRkXr+MUGlYF AUPo9cLDYOneGaM4jPKyx7l6FS580aki14jufmPSNBJVYru5xv4VFRnPzohB8BcAPO9Z ls4iVBkHCdADeByM7Nq9hUnAIY9nrGwjPCDUs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.86.8 with SMTP id q8mr130426vcl.174.1308192166327; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.80.149 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:42:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:42:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64764165f34d404a5cb3937 --0016e64764165f34d404a5cb3937 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2. Yep, the feather is bit ....arghhhhh. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Ken Goodhope wrote: > 6,2,4 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop. > > The feather would classy on that background too. > > And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop. > > --Konstantin > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > > wrote: > > > > > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho > > > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man! > > > > > > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their > > > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here! > > > -- > > > Take care, > > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > > > > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, > > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko < > shv.hadoop@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > It should look something like this: > > > > > > > > > > http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg > > > > > > > > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3 > > > > > > > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. > > > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> All, > > > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > > them > > > >> all on a page, here: > > > >> > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > >> > > > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round > of > > > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The > important > > > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > >> > > > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > >> > > > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, > you > > > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your > > vote > > > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > >> > > > >> -- Owen > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --0016e64764165f34d404a5cb3937-- From general-return-3802-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 02:53:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A72486010 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88412 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:52:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88334 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 02:52:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88196 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 02:52:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:52:52 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1287922vws.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:52:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=uDPiaxooo03EhmoQ2ACRZ6OXBUj6xfQPhpFBQPiv21w=; b=sW+Mn/YZJsCD/uL+9Z3xkqE7bkLXiAsfYLmd6d+3MdLrs3cuxbrjc50B05rVcw2ltF eK22mWdCNlKW+ZZnGFzHfdAWW05KVh9F6ipRyPSafDFLJrz+oXfHbpS8SmjwkpG6T7yu DuAFLLHwL44GexBZbsJiEztO1ul7xNKG+FHxU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=jyWEvTRYddtE5UlbaMEezQwU/MdjItHfT8Ro3jj6i2UumPG9FFHdrKnAUNB8W9R0mE yTfgmIAx+m7xjmnc1qeM77p3asJOvNfjYMzRJXWZkUzDC17cvpR2oqiyvtJQo+WvvUbE wF3l8MlINYFFWAb9p/Ie6cO8C1KTvarmm5Rm0= Received: by 10.52.113.138 with SMTP id iy10mr519769vdb.55.1308192751385; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.2.121] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e14sm659792vby.6.2011.06.15.19.52.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:52:24 +1000 Cc: Eli Collins , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Matthew Foley Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <57051FE9-4CC3-4997-B7B7-D8B62DBC377C@Holsman.net> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> To: trademarks@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) So to second a point here. We are not saying you can't patch your distribution, add your own = features, share it with your friends, or do whatever you want to the = code.=20 all we're saying is that you can't call that 'Apache Hadoop'. On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Matthew, >=20 > I'm sorry I have to disagree. >=20 > If you change a bit in a work, it becomes a derived work. There's no = "demotion" involved. Just a definition of derived work. >=20 > There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has = voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer = what the PMC has voted on. It's a derived work. >=20 > The rules for voting in Apache require that if you change a bit in an = artifact, you can no longer count votes for the previous artifact. = Because the new work is different. A new vote is required. >=20 > Not gray. Black and white. >=20 > Simple as that. >=20 > Craig >=20 > P.S. for the anthropologists, look at the history of Apache Derby and = Sun JavaDB. Meaningful, specific example. >=20 > On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Matthew Foley wrote: >=20 >> I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that >> * applying a small-number-of-patches that are >> * for high-severity-bug-fixes, and >> * have been Apache-Hadoop-committed >> to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a = "derived work". >> However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be = meaningfully >> correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably = has >> become a derived work. >>=20 >> But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? = That's why I'd like to >> see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an = example. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> --Matt >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>=20 >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley = wrote: >>> Eli, you said: >>>> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into = the same >>>> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >>>> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people = who >>>> contribute to and invest in the project. >>>=20 >>> How would you phrase the distinction, so that it is clear and = reasonably unambiguous >>> for people who are not Hadoop developers? Do the HTTP and = Subversion policies >>> draw this distinction, and if so could you please point us at the = specific text, or >>> copy that text to this thread? >>>=20 >>=20 >> I'll try to find it, this was told to me verbally a while back. Maybe >> Roy can chime in. >>=20 >> Since there seems to be some confusion around distribution we should >> make this explicit. Some people are currently interpreting the >> guidelines to say that if you patch an Apache Hadoop release yourself >> then you're still running Apache Hadoop. But if a vendor patches >> Apache Hadoop for you then you're not running Apache Hadoop. How = about >> if a subcontractor patches Apache Hadoop for you, then is it Apache >> Hadoop? This isn't sustainable. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Eli >>> Thanks, >>> --Matt >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I = think we >>>>> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that >>>>> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted. >>>>=20 >>>> Actually, the document is extremely clear that only Apache releases = may be called Hadoop. >>>>=20 >>>> There was a very long thread about why the rapidly expanding = Hadoop-ecosystem is leading to at lot of customer confusion about the = different "versions" of Hadoop. We as the Hadoop project don't have the = resources or the necessary compatibility test suite to test = compatibility between the different sets of cherry picked patches. We = also don't have time to ensure that all of the 1,000's of patches = applied to 0.20.2 in each of the many (10? 15?) different versions have = been committed to trunk. Futhermore, under the Apache license, a company = Foo could claim that it is a cherry pick version of Hadoop without = releasing their source code that would enable verification. >>>>=20 >>>> In summary, >>>> 1. Hadoop is very successful. >>>> 2. There are many different commercial products that are trying to = use the Hadoop name. >>>> 3. We can't check or enforce that the cherry pick versions are = following the rules. >>>> 4. We don't have a TCK like Java does to validate new versions are = compatible. >>>> 5. By far the most fair way to ensure compatibility and fairness = between companies is that only Apache Hadoop releases may be called = Hadoop. >>>>=20 >>>> That said, a package that includes a small number (< 3) of security = patches that haven't been released yet doesn't seem unreasonable. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of >>> anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). = By >>> this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop, >>> including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc are not using Hadoop. Is >>> that really the message we want to send? We expect the PMC to = enforce >>> this equally across all parties? >>>=20 >>> It's a fact of life that companies and ops teams that support Hadoop >>> need to patch the software before the PMC has time and/or will to = vote >>> on new releases. This is why HTTP and Subversion allow this. Putting = a >>> build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same >>> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not >>> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people = who >>> contribute to and invest in the project. >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> Eli >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 > Craig L Russell > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > Chair, OpenJPA PMC > clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman If you can believe in your power to do great things, you will. -- = Michael Berg From general-return-3803-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 03:04:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B54E368ED for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95321 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 03:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95266 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 03:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95257 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 03:04:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:04:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:04:49 +0000 Received: by yic24 with SMTP id 24so928488yic.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.229.11 with SMTP id b11mr420302ybh.300.1308193467217; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:04:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.150.158.15 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:04:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:04:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kM0Bmz25vTFIgz3_PGuij8XzwAM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 18:30, Konstantin Shvachko w= rote: > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop. > The feather would classy on that background too. > And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop. Yeah, lotta heavy lifting here for sure... > --Konstantin > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrot= e: > >> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho >> power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man! >> >> It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their >> votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here! >> -- >> =A0 Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >> >> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, >> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author >> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko >> wrote: >> > It should look something like this: >> > >> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO4= 0OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg >> > >> > But given the choices: =A06 2 4 5 1 3 >> > >> > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it. >> > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --Konstantin >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> > >> >> All, >> >> =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put= them >> >> all on a page, here: >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round o= f >> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important >> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, yo= u >> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your v= ote >> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> >> >> -- Owen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > From general-return-3804-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 03:40:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E837672D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19372 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 03:40:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18836 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 03:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13545 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 03:32:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mpdm.kyoji@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rAx0iI+Rd46Xpwu46Y7A/vFAiPBWa3v+M3EVdzos+vQ=; b=pRn2V+1S5quEdCshx+DGbqFRiyOZqm49KTujoPGBBLLxBCp0y5eEYLQDP/WaYpWt1I 0fEbXY9fiWZGZK2JpruLAawFv5CHQld79rvN783A484FjHFvZ99WTEYKhx9kj0Ws+0/D uNvMJh32EN6UO1cXc9YFCWzX6rqCD/Aop6z6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iVIDLYAkJEO70QeTiOXOAEqMDAiUG/GmF5DvyauH0dOqhepR9kFWKgscC+3h05+/12 AEZ3T8CT5aoVA2OEU3jMx0YwHXNeCl04LgiLKUPPw1/4VFpxBc2XjS6ezjZChE51bKTk /Np5GtNyGamXy3XQni9BozzJktTfEibLb4e9s= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:32:21 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Kyoji KATO To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c45beb990ab04a5cbea73 --0015174c45beb990ab04a5cbea73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1 Thanks, Kyoji KATO On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --0015174c45beb990ab04a5cbea73-- From general-return-3805-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 04:25:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59B4769F3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40631 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:25:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40428 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40419 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 04:25:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:25:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jrottinghuis@ebay.com) Received: from [216.33.244.6] (HELO rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com) (216.33.244.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:24:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:CC: Date:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=NH8qeEcxcUrwDJpX2CppzcRuW+PUe1VUeej6TFjXA7tXluCDUU6DK4dm qlVFn+/D8a061x/TKynFAfvfzDVkwrXeTlHABpzb5vdRlmkEm9wN601xb NaToqT8MFAe2Id6; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=jrottinghuis@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1308198298; x=1339734298; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jAD3vEEk9nusIGR7BIFifk+wgKVWC73O3AmZ3MNHXuU=; b=VIhQRgqi+DjVd1btvYnIsPAkYSMD03xVEe534ELmLUZovTncynWTKQ5T Fhmj/Wxhmlt0z7Fg4rf7Z0NV1vMa2YvC+fiNTK4dd52wmDRTvNQVmmM/k yV+62zStvch4Wux; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,373,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="21223833" Received: from rhv-vtenf-002.corp.ebay.com (HELO RHV-MEXHT-002.corp.ebay.com) ([10.112.113.53]) by rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2011 21:24:35 -0700 Received: from RHV-MEXMS-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.17.115]) by RHV-MEXHT-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.24.101]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:24:35 -0700 From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Apache Brand Management Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:24:34 -0700 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: AcwreJbFqZl9y8X4TmqfGatLTE6gBgAYkcpg Message-ID: References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== x-ems-stamp: iqa3cp3DvxV5uxeg0v2OYA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter: Scanned It does make sense to me to distinguish between the case when a company see= ks to benefit from using the Hadoop name for their product and the case whe= n a company uses Hadoop internally with some minor patches. For example: large company creates a game-show playing appliance and explai= ns that they have used Hadoop for some of the learning tasks. Not allowed i= f they applied more than 3 patches? Or: company claims they have a large Hadoop deployment and are looking for = developers to help them with their Hadoop development work is not allowed? = What's the alternative? Wanted: Powered by Apache=99 Hadoop=99 developers? Also, if thousands of changes are packaged together into one giant patch, i= s that allowed? Perhaps a similarity index (such as used by Git to determine if two files a= re similar enough to be considered a rename) would make sense? If 98% of th= e code is the same, would it be Hadoop if used internally and not sold/mark= etted as a product? Cheers, Joep ________________________________________ From: Eli Collins [eli@cloudera.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:23 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an >> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying >> that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should >> your employer not be able to say they use Hadoop? I'm -1 on a >> proposal that does this. > > I think there is a big difference between some company that uses H= adoop with some patches internally and a company that puts out a distributi= on for others to use, usually for-profit. The wiki makes no such distinction. The PMC will apply the rules equally to all parties. According to Owen's email if you are using a release of Apache Hadoop and have applied more than 2 security patches or any backports you are not using Hadoop. Thanks, Eli= From general-return-3806-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 04:31:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2161E6F70 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42923 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:31:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42846 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:31:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42837 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 04:31:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:31:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:31:01 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1725363bwz.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.19.74 with SMTP id z10mr298670bka.183.1308198640178; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org, Eli Collins , Matthew Foley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a47e3e57ab04a5ccbbd1 --00032555a47e3e57ab04a5ccbbd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has > voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer what > the PMC has voted on. It's a derived work. > > The rules for voting in Apache require that if you change a bit in an > artifact, you can no longer count votes for the previous artifact. Because > the new work is different. A new vote is required. > Sorry, but this is just silly. Are you telling me that the httpd package in Ubuntu isn't Apache httpd? It has 43 patches applied. Tomcat6 has 17. I'm sure every other commonly used piece of software bundled with ubuntu has been patched, too. I don't see them calling their packages "Ubuntu HTTP server powered by Apache HTTPD". It's just httpd. The httpd in RHEL 5 is the same way. In fact they even provide some nice metadata in their patches, for example: httpd-2.0.48-release.patch:Upstream-Status: vendor-specific change httpd-2.1.10-apctl.patch:Upstream-Status: Vendor-specific changes for better initscript integration To me, this is a good thing: allowing vendors to redistribute the software with some modifications makes it much more accessible to users and businesses alike, and that's part of why Hadoop has had so much success. So long as we require the vendors to upstream those modifications back to the ASF, we get the benefits of these contributions back in the community and everyone should be happy. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00032555a47e3e57ab04a5ccbbd1-- From general-return-3807-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 04:47:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B95EC61EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54872 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:47:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54804 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:47:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54788 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 04:47:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:47:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:47:29 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1348622vws.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=SrWbuX7UU81WvF60WW5bbEEZELJTZwTR4tn5h+vmmGo=; b=VeAthUr8EoYU1JMmnerkqoZeEuI1UdN17IZ15ZOC69lGfT1yqFMF04dJ8bDzMTCMvj ZW93X97i+ovjeci8KcEfNfOhSgyvaufnMehU7bkinlSYc1JmnAsjbWiAwClWh8VgeO+p kRP9qMxpaIHhKIVw8IRoFj35JePZ+2vindU8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=RDmZjX1m1p8wZ/7bGXWcFhK8EL5dymOoUusb26AiRUCe/MXJnmoGbJDw8xJ9rGjMvj qR+FyQON2UMZufdb0M6/qXh5KHKj5GAZ/DFmLPRy5epmCXJW+uxcXW127IIRkWSpRwVf Lrls13vJJJYMbUzZVWk0StdKUL1x4NwJ4sERw= Received: by 10.52.109.101 with SMTP id hr5mr583030vdb.251.1308199628361; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.2.121] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l15sm450639vdt.22.2011.06.15.21.47.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:47:01 +1000 Cc: trademarks@apache.org, Eli Collins , Matthew Foley Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Craig L Russell > wrote: >=20 >> There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC = has >> voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer = what >> the PMC has voted on. It's a derived work. >>=20 >> The rules for voting in Apache require that if you change a bit in an >> artifact, you can no longer count votes for the previous artifact. = Because >> the new work is different. A new vote is required. >>=20 >=20 > Sorry, but this is just silly. Are you telling me that the httpd = package in > Ubuntu isn't Apache httpd? It has 43 patches applied. Tomcat6 has 17. = I'm > sure every other commonly used piece of software bundled with ubuntu = has > been patched, too. I don't see them calling their packages "Ubuntu = HTTP > server powered by Apache HTTPD". It's just httpd. >=20 well.. for RHEL in the early days of httpd, a configuration that ran on = RHEL would not work on the 'vanilla' httpd. (they implemented a feature called include which could take a wildcard, = which wasn't in the released version of httpd at the time) even today.. I can't build redis on my mac as I am using GNU's libtool = instead of the one packaged on the mac.=20 http://code.google.com/p/redis/issues/detail?id=3D443 so yes .. even a simple patch makes it derived, because it is different. > -Todd > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3808-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 04:47:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A4FB631C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56373 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:47:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56320 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44456 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 04:32:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uvsaradhi@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Xwput261sJ25nqLnajjVf5EF9nuyhbJl0rAs6DBmu7c=; b=n7Hzyn+LvFhLdTJS0yphzle/Uit89S6OxPyzaO76KGsDVThvpHT1JcAAYnf83iYFyn Y+wqJWaiGm2cvJIBqMiwSIZm/LuYyemDnZVNo9wXuBrTrCNGGPwzBp9SzeEn217PEn7Z 7tAwxZxE3s08INrZYkLO9NElnsX2c8l8X5IfM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YMEI3moq/Kt4fFt+GOEz+F+GkFVKXdbn4iz95Dw2hNVjbwe6p0JmPD5tFzEh2l89eE 5YlVRcWW3xLmLEfWJDx69kY9WOzvTlAFTX+34rAnuk0JQnUxI4HArYaMHehH8l52A4IZ RXalh3jp1ENRjEjFR0lBK4IXkb4mrYUmad0JE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:02:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo: From: UV Saradhi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 From general-return-3809-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 04:51:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F334B66ED for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61193 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:51:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61149 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 04:51:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61141 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 04:51:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:51:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esteban@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:51:28 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so3737gxk.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.82.7 with SMTP id j7mr613396agl.99.1308199867146; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:51:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.84.6 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:50:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Esteban Gutierrez Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:50:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5, 6, 4, 2, 3, 1 esteban. On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kyoji KATO wro= te: > > Hey all, > > My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1 > > Thanks, > Kyoji KATO > > On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > All, > > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put t= hem > > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vot= e > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > From general-return-3810-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 05:06:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D4DA6E3B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72128 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 05:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72075 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 05:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72066 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 05:06:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:06:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:06:18 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so771013qwj.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:05:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0HFqoVQ8Y0z3OwFl+sFn1a0lpGBY6lWXDXtLTDm4sQc=; b=mttjBeLNgt21nsBhv1Xb4DEn5BXq70bpdFnZXogPfPowl0fENnKnNkUd/bj8rim3qK +kgT1DGGX1Xf7wzh1a4fqExan5D8LDS3nw80ZyQuW2HCv+zVdn/b/RAyFGYdbsIPwYYZ 4DjsVOAh64aa9omGBi0ViyTG1EGT+Yf1fM1/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tKifIZvPTUq8D2J2wkwmD/EWa3yfah5PvGget+V0IAH0hTSaQHCyLaq/qs8XiAX1QL OPltJQCXWTQG9GT3FAJpeJzRNONaAgYGqStpT/NrhSaf8WhE/9OOtzXup780HAOgTT5X KQLcj1OOGjDv53Dkga0GxnaE4HuZCSt63/lQk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.218.66 with SMTP id hp2mr333802qab.291.1308200757553; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.135 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:05:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:05:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0dDOitHFDhV0dgW7dbcyUU0-Ybc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2 St.Ack On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3811-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 06:36:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47B6E67A9 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63867 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 06:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63664 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 06:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63628 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 06:36:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:36:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:36:13 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so1320884pve.35 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.5.234 with SMTP id v10mr288781pbv.132.1308206152425; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.47.165 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org, Eli Collins , Matthew Foley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52158290221a304a5ce7b31 --bcaec52158290221a304a5ce7b31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > so yes .. even a simple patch makes it derived, because it is different. > ...and a "dervied work" is fine. Nothing inherently wrong with the term derived. I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not* saying "Apache Hadoop," just "Hadoop" when the derived work is actually derived (to any degree, as Craig R pointed out). Apache Hadoop always and forever means the bits voted on by the PMC - no vendor can claim that - but there does appear to be plenty of prior examples of "reasonable" use of ASF (and other OSS organization) project names in clearly derived works. I do agree there should be a policy and it needs to be universally applied to be fair to all involved. Not to kick up the compatibility dust storm again, but people will always claim crazy stuff that may or may not be true. We should just ignore it. Any day of the week someone is claiming XYZ compatible either explicitly or implicitly (as in client libraries for Foo Project). For cases where a vendor makes a claim that isn't true, users will ask, we'll clarify that Apache makes no guarantees of derived work compatibility and doesn't certify anything (and specifically does the opposite - *NO* guarantees or warranties). Example uses I think should be fine / acceptable: YDH (even though it no longer exists, it's a good example) and Y!'s use of Hadoop Facebook Hadoop Hadoop at eBay Hadoop at LinkedIn IBM's use of Hadoop and yes, CDH* Even if some / all of the above modify at least a single bit (and may *technically* be derived works) everyone understands what they mean. As for the confusion, the OSS community has always just said "oh, they patch some stuff, you should probably ask them" when confronted with vendor modified versions of upstream projects; I've been involved in many of those upstream projects, including a Linux distro (downstream). We should always be polite to downstream users in redirecting them, but I think redirecting them is fine. It's not confusing to users in my experience (we can make it a FAQ or something and just point people there) as RedHat, Novell, Oracle, IBM, and many other vendors have been happily[1] coexisting with their upstream counterparts for a long time. I believe we (the collective Apache Hadoop community including those that redistribute Hadoop bits in various forms) should focus on producing regular, quality releases in a cooperative and constructive environment, and continue to require vendors to provide the proper attribution and license information. This is in everyone's interest, vendors and direct users alike. *Disclosure: I work for Cloudera and I think this should apply to anyone and everyone, including my employer (with whom I obviously do not clear emails. :)) [1] OK, maybe not always "happily" but mostly so. You know what I mean. Thanks to Steve L and others for their hard work on this one. (Sorry for the long email.) -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --bcaec52158290221a304a5ce7b31-- From general-return-3812-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 07:24:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCD9662BC for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28283 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28214 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28206 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 07:24:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:24:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pedro.figueiredo@playfish.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:24:04 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1289312wyb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.178.72 with SMTP id bl8mr545028wbb.6.1308209024088; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.21.98.155] ([80.169.35.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o38sm938317wba.3.2011.06.16.00.23.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Pedro Figueiredo In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:23:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <515495E0-B5AF-450B-9BBF-F4A5633E6F7B@playfish.com> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5, 4, 2, 6, 1, 3 Cheers, Pedro Figueiredo Systems Engineer, Playfish EA Interactive Skype: pfiguk Web: http://www.playfish.com ---- Electronic Arts Ltd, Registered office address Onslow House, Onslow = Street, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4TN, UK. Reg. in England & Wales, Reg. = No. 2057591 From general-return-3813-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 08:44:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6508F652B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55408 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55360 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55347 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1472793vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.37.129 with SMTP id y1mr834511vdj.199.1308213893419; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.183.8 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Apache Brand Management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -1 if patches that have been committed to trunk are not permitted to be applied to distributions that are still called "Apache Hadoop". That's the rule we agreed on some time ago at Roy's suggestion. Let's first document the status quo, then, separately, discuss and vote on changes to it. Also, such a branding rule should probably be uniform across Apache projects, not Hadoop-specific. Doug On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =C2=A0=C2=A0 Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can= be called > Hadoop at=C2=A0http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After som= e > cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd > like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put t= he > content on our web site. > Clearly, I'm +1. > -- Owen From general-return-3814-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 09:28:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0657F6BF3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3194 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 09:28:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3144 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 09:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3136 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 09:28:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:28:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ranjit@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:28:11 +0000 Received: from dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.77.50]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5G9R8XF008288 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308216430; bh=/PZ6r4Inc/J+hyQej2SqWBwFvcvxy7WHYAQJj8yYNdw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LDelv2F3Su8Rk9FB2mYMrwAEla0pPvED8DXyh3kl/ctF55A6bSbKef0tMA1rbDx6m aYqj9TiCnugc+opAGHlnNSb8exe/AFVpa5eI1AQcynKixEBj7XBhw+4/DQJASfZ9+k 9GOiZ4W3ZZhNwG/g0iqrb8YktYjWpZyGxCMD6LjE= Message-ID: <4DF9CC6C.4050306@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:57:08 +0530 From: Ranjit Mathew Organization: Yahoo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06/13/2011 09:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Oops, sorry about that one. I will take care of that in about 30 minutes >> (just headed out the door now to catch a train). If someone else with commit >> access wants to, you just need to propset the externals to point to th new >> common/trunk/common/src/test/bin instead of the old location. >> >> > Fixed the svn:externals Does it make sense for "test-patch.sh" and "smart-apply-patch.sh" to remain "external" now that they're within the same project? Currently on every "svn up" for trunk I get: -------------------------- 8< -------------------------- $ svn up Fetching external item into 'hdfs/src/test/bin' External at revision 1136333. Fetching external item into 'mapreduce/src/test/bin' External at revision 1136333. At revision 1136333. -------------------------- 8< -------------------------- after a little pause. Ranjit PS: I'm using "svn, version 1.6.16 (r1073529)" on Fedora 14/x86-32. From general-return-3815-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 10:45:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE1866B9 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82760 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 10:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82696 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 10:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82688 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 10:45:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of svenkat@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:45:21 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5GAijqd032810 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308221086; bh=TpOD2X7ziI/iYycgJniXx+myxfrzyJC76jE8699rd5k=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=ovbNwAxe0IBkZGZmsSgprKr+1Z9FZuj41Qkwd2lF3hG3+z6U+xqFN8y8rutN8vXbX sDNfRiKMRfZwXCBo+ZoolXXrf+MJfrl44qUjq+1teGwP6Gv2pQbdDZ9eA6evZs7jIJ djGsELPjDt6r0EJnennYJAtThuIm9xItfzy8/2TA= Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:14:45 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:14:44 +0530 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Thread-Index: AcwrCyYHVipAuqPyRaKXOV7kHDLtQQAH01Gr Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My vote: 4, 3, 2, 6, 5, 1 Thanks, Venkatesh On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them= all > on a page, here: >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >=20 > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, > let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thi= ng is > to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >=20 > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >=20 > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3816-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 11:00:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3639630F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21274 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21216 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21208 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91821B7DDB for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:00:21 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bCAfPVE5QjR5 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:00:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8064B7DD3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:00:20 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308826806.68105@1G+p/SSlMaE2iJgMSCTHdw Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5GB06Mk013119 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:00:06 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF9E236.5050500@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:00:06 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Bigtop Proposal References: <4DF75531.9050302@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5GB06Mk013119 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 15/06/11 19:23, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom >> White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build and >> testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to have >> coordinated releases. >> > > I will comment on the proposal directly as well, but coordinated releases > would be a disaster. Mahout, for one, should not have to wait for Hadoop to > have a release. We are already unhappy that we only get two releases a year > and want to up that to four. > > Much better is to have a directed acyclic dependency graph with coherent > versioning. That allows projects to stay independent, but still express you could do synchronised factored releases: if Hadoop ships every 12 months, other things could come out every 4 months against the last major release, things like Hama could come out monthly while in the rapidly evolving state. From general-return-3817-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 11:47:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B6B67DE for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77422 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77349 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77341 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 11:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8DB7D5D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:47:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CPxDDY0FbEHn for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:47:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80452B7CFF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:47:00 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308829606.68752@WxITeuoRSA6XcOfAAW/81Q Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5GBkkIO014640 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:46:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DF9ED26.50108@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:46:46 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5GBkkIO014640 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16/06/11 07:35, Eric Sammer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> so yes .. even a simple patch makes it derived, because it is different. >> > > ...and a "dervied work" is fine. Nothing inherently wrong with the term > derived. I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not* > saying "Apache Hadoop," just "Hadoop" when the derived work is actually > derived (to any degree, as Craig R pointed out). Apache Hadoop always and > forever means the bits voted on by the PMC - no vendor can claim that - but > there does appear to be plenty of prior examples of "reasonable" use of ASF > (and other OSS organization) project names in clearly derived works. I do > agree there should be a policy and it needs to be universally applied to be > fair to all involved. > > Not to kick up the compatibility dust storm again, but people will always > claim crazy stuff that may or may not be true. We should just ignore it. The issue is branding and trademarks, eventually things get downgraded to become meaningless. If I code an MR engine in erlang (I have one somewhere), can I call it "Hadoop for Erlang"? > Any > day of the week someone is claiming XYZ compatible either explicitly or > implicitly (as in client libraries for Foo Project). For cases where a > vendor makes a claim that isn't true, users will ask, we'll clarify that > Apache makes no guarantees of derived work compatibility and doesn't certify > anything (and specifically does the opposite - *NO* guarantees or > warranties). -BigTop could provide that defensible compatibility statement. "Automotive Joe's Crankshaft platform passed the Apache BigTop DFS, MR, Mahout and HBase test suites" > > Example uses I think should be fine / acceptable: > > YDH (even though it no longer exists, it's a good example) and Y!'s use of > Hadoop -creates confusion and encourages the notion that anything is a distribution of hadoop, which is the situation that the trademarks people are trying to crack down > Facebook Hadoop -depends on internal vs external > Hadoop at eBay > Hadoop at LinkedIn details of internal use, as valid as "Hadoop in Steve's house", which, given my known network state, is always something to cherish. And while I have built my branch up and published it, it's no longer something I distribute (though it is in an open SVN repository somewhere). I'm working directly with Apache Hadoop 0.20.203 these days. > IBM's use of Hadoop not sure about IBM distribution of Apache Hadoop, as I presume it has the uncommitted patch to work on IBM JVMs (though were someone to commit it..) http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/idah The biginsights product is more explicit and, to me, a good example of terminology. Their own brand, description of the benefits, and details on what's in there: "IBM InfoSphere BigInsights Enterprise Edition For turning complex, internet-scale information into insight, cost effectively IBM® InfoSphere™ BigInsights Enterprise Edition enables new solutions that turn large, complex volumes of data into insight, cost effectively. InfoSphere BigInsights delivers an enterprise-ready big data solution by combining Apache Hadoop, including the MapReduce framework and the Hadoop Distributed File Systems (HDFS), with unique technologies and capabilities from across IBM." That gives them the flexibility to swap things around in future (switch to GPFS, MapR, Brisk) without having to change their branding. > and yes, CDH* If you look a the CDH site its now "Cloudera's Distribution including Apache Hadoop". After all it's Cloudera's data analysis stack including Apache Hadoop, > Even if some / all of the above modify at least a single bit (and may > *technically* be derived works) everyone understands what they mean. As for > the confusion, the OSS community has always just said "oh, they patch some > stuff, you should probably ask them" when confronted with vendor modified > versions of upstream projects; I've been involved in many of those upstream > projects, including a Linux distro (downstream). We should always be polite > to downstream users in redirecting them, but I think redirecting them is > fine. It's not confusing to users in my experience (we can make it a FAQ or > something and just point people there) as RedHat, Novell, Oracle, IBM, and > many other vendors have been happily[1] coexisting with their upstream > counterparts for a long time. co-existence yes; happiness, not always: http://www.jonobacon.org/2010/07/30/red-hat-canonical-and-gnome-contributions/ http://lwn.net/Articles/374737/ http://gburt.blogspot.com/2011/02/banshee-supporting-gnome-on-ubuntu.html http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/view/head:/debian/patches/ubuntu-codes-amazon.patch Where ubuntu are good is that launchpad is a good entry point for filing and tracking any ubuntu-related problem, and helping to push that upstream, so the local issue can be linked to the source issue, letting me deal with problems like getting sound to work: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/523269 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/584844 JIRA doesn't do that cross-instance tracking, which is painful for me at work, where I do deal with multiple JIRA instances. You can put remote URLs in, but they don't get synchronised. I can't say SFOS-780 depends on apache.org/MAPREDUCE-279, for example. > > I believe we (the collective Apache Hadoop community including those that > redistribute Hadoop bits in various forms) should focus on producing > regular, quality releases in a cooperative and constructive environment, and > continue to require vendors to provide the proper attribution and license > information. This is in everyone's interest, vendors and direct users alike. +1 > *Disclosure: I work for Cloudera and I think this should apply to anyone and > everyone, including my employer (with whom I obviously do not clear emails. > :)) I understand -it may ultimately affect my employer too. Which is why a consistent approach matters, then nobody will feel they are being discriminated against. From general-return-3818-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 13:49:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA8486EE7 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3431 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 13:49:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3382 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 13:49:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3374 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 13:49:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:49:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of david.scott.williams.nc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:49:27 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3123928qyk.14 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:49:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MyYSiUanthQaLHwHgm5Dh2KPfJRHQ6b8jgO7jUuVrzU=; b=cxufKPhjQ/W0SHiGFcGtbwpSI0zcIH3JHbXmGXr/Ee6vZIINXa8YyfjEUr4ln74quH aEAhk4He/+mG9nbI9RhG3bD0aFCCLjevszu6/xfmDDp6SkVZkwrDTZbFlYEbRPX1pmdQ N1pHfj3DmhEOfXzoIIOIojSmpjZQxJZt63LT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CHLr/TEzk3fRG0/bPmBgfEeb5YyZzMayOolihlxyEXLOXK5akstuBaYdY7+nRnPeZC KFvjZI/1agq7Yw8pn1+Ji98mheVKaTLlTeDUpdgpFX6hvD/PjXyC09Hvhejcc1M1M/63 tdV+kqw+VL7NVti8I2nYGppXAjCJe7a0iq5S8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.48.200 with SMTP id s8mr762731qcf.118.1308232142246; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.184.147 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:49:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Is this just bluster? From: David Scott Williams To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 http://gigaom.com/cloud/lexisnexis-open-sources-its-hadoop-killer/ -- =========================== David Scott Williams 828-245-3866 (home) 973-981-1997 (cell) =========================== I write my blog at http://deadpenguinsociety.org Twitter @dscott_williams From general-return-3819-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 14:23:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBA566A14 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84626 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 14:23:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84580 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 14:23:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84572 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 14:23:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:23:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:23:08 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5GDlG4f002239 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:47:16 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 2C799490BF37 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id xn6JTa3RgSjK4trh for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5GEMk4V013824; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:46 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:22:46 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:23:25 -0500 Subject: Re: Is this just bluster? Thread-Topic: Is this just bluster? Thread-Index: AcwsMNyn6bAhAU3wQqeep3H088i7HQ== Message-ID: <3FCB6229-BB89-4D05-BA98-6ADA1510EF90@navteq.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 It depends on what you mean by bluster. There isn't anything really new about the concept of distributed file sys= tems or parallel processing frameworks. =20 My take is that LexisNexus wants to expand the market for their existing = solution. Not so much bluster. However, definitely some marketing spin and their in= terpretation of things. It's interesting in that some of their comments about some of the issues = with Hadoop echo the comments made by others like maprtech, EMC, IBM etc = =2E.. =20 I just don't think that there is going to be much interest in their offer= ings beyond their existing customer base. (IMHO) The market is big and as= we transition from leading edge/bleeding edge we will see more fragmenta= tion then in a couple of years consolidation. Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On Jun 16, 2011, at 8:49 AM, "David Scott Williams" wrote: > http://gigaom.com/cloud/lexisnexis-open-sources-its-hadoop-killer/ >=20 > --=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D > David Scott Williams > 828-245-3866 (home) > 973-981-1997 (cell) > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D >=20 > I write my blog at http://deadpenguinsociety.org > Twitter @dscott_williams The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3820-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 14:48:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D14626F6C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34291 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 14:48:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34174 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 14:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34161 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 14:48:50 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:48:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:48:49 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1032335qwj.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:48:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.10.209 with SMTP id q17mr816727qcq.106.1308235728687; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.206 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:48:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:48:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ecb74e4119904a5d55db6 --0016364ecb74e4119904a5d55db6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep wrote: It does make sense to me to distinguish between the case when a company > seeks to benefit from using the Hadoop name for their product and the case > when a company uses Hadoop internally with some minor patches. > If they aren't distributing the version that they use, no one will know or care if they have patches applied. Eli is just trying to cloud the real issue, which is about distributors and what they call their derivative works. For example: large company creates a game-show playing appliance and > explains that they have used Hadoop for some of the learning tasks. Not > allowed if they applied more than 3 patches? > Of course it is allowed. It is only a question of whether you can distribute it to others and call it Hadoop. > Also, if thousands of changes are packaged together into one giant patch, > is that allowed? > No, the exception is strictly for critical security fixes and I would sincerely hope that those would be released by Apache in very short order. -- Owen --0016364ecb74e4119904a5d55db6-- From general-return-3821-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 15:02:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D55606A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65515 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:02:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65436 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:02:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65419 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 15:02:17 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:02:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:02:17 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1029661qyk.14 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:02:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.10.209 with SMTP id q17mr831401qcq.106.1308236536034; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.206 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:02:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:02:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ecb7403360304a5d58ebe --0016364ecb7403360304a5d58ebe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not* > saying "Apache Hadoop," just "Hadoop" when the derived work is actually > derived (to any degree, as Craig R pointed out). Apache Hadoop always and > forever means the bits voted on by the PMC - no vendor can claim that - but > there does appear to be plenty of prior examples of "reasonable" use of ASF > (and other OSS organization) project names in clearly derived works. > Thank you, Eric, for demonstrating why we are fixing it. Apache owns the Hadoop trademark. Hadoop is PRECISELY the same as Apache Hadoop. They are two names for the same thing. If the Hadoop PMC were to fail to enforce that, the Apache board would remove us en masse from the PMC. -- Owen --0016364ecb7403360304a5d58ebe-- From general-return-3822-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 15:32:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6982464B6 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44710 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44664 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44656 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 15:32:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:32:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:31:55 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1739159wyb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:31:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.75 with SMTP id r53mr996279wek.98.1308238295574; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:31:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:31:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep wrote: > > It does make sense to me to distinguish between the case when a company >> seeks to benefit from using the Hadoop name for their product and the case >> when a company uses Hadoop internally with some minor patches. >> > > If they aren't distributing the version that they use, no one will know or > care if they have patches applied. Eli is just trying to cloud the real > issue, which is about distributors and what they call > their derivative works. > I truly don't see distribution as the relevant issue, in particular I don't see why the definition of what Hadoop should change on whether or not you distribute it. > For example: large company creates a game-show playing appliance and >> explains that they have used Hadoop for some of the learning tasks. Not >> allowed if they applied more than 3 patches? >> > > Of course it is allowed. It is only a question of whether you can distribute > it to others and call it Hadoop. > So you want IBM to call what they run Hadoop, unless they put it up on a website in which case they can no longer call it Hadoop. What is the rationale? Thanks, Eli From general-return-3823-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 15:38:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E271611F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67472 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:38:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67407 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67399 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 15:38:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:38:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED721BAA27 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9mWLl0TxUUzn for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3241C1BAA1D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:18 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308843485.35787@NYUnXM77F+TWZQp71VEb2A Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5GFc3Qb021151 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DFA235A.1060301@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:02 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Is this just bluster? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5GFc3Qb021151 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16/06/11 14:49, David Scott Williams wrote: > http://gigaom.com/cloud/lexisnexis-open-sources-its-hadoop-killer/ > It's interesting that they decided they had to become open source to survive. It's the Linux effect: it's not that it's better than Solaris was, it just got the momentum up. A strength of Hadoop is that it does have layers on it, and a lot of the interesting stuff is above the basic layer -Mahout, Pig, Hive, Hama, etc, and you can plug in things: filesystems, schedulers, HDFS placers. While we can debate what "compatible" means, by implementing the APIs that the higher layers use, MapR and hence EMC's products can run those higher layers. HPCC looks to be a completely new ecosystem. Oh, and the license is AGPL, which complicates any external-facing web app way more than even GPL does. Good for business models (you can pay for the alternate license), but not ideal for takeup. HPCC do a good comparision page here, seems quite unbiased http://hpccsystems.com/why-HPCC/HPCC-vs-hadoop Regarding performance, I haven't seen any new terasort numbers for a while. Whoever next brings up a 1000+ node cluster should publish them. As HPCC say: "In practice, HPCC configurations require significantly fewer nodes to provide the same processing performance as a Hadoop cluster. Sizing of clusters may depend however on the overall storage requirements for the distributed file system." That means if your cluster is driven by storage demands, that fixes node size more than CPU issues (though if you need less CPUs, that's capex and opex savings or the opportunity to do other things with CPU time) From general-return-3824-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 15:41:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7994861AC for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75608 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:41:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75557 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75549 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 15:41:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:41:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:41:51 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1751346wyb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:41:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.103 with SMTP id q81mr1014220wep.83.1308238890738; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:41:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:41:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not* >> saying "Apache Hadoop," just "Hadoop" when the derived work is actually >> derived (to any degree, as Craig R pointed out). Apache Hadoop always and >> forever means the bits voted on by the PMC - no vendor can claim that - but >> there does appear to be plenty of prior examples of "reasonable" use of ASF >> (and other OSS organization) project names in clearly derived works. >> > > Thank you, Eric, for demonstrating why we are fixing it. Apache owns the > Hadoop trademark. Hadoop is PRECISELY the same as Apache Hadoop. They are > two names for the same thing. If the Hadoop PMC were to fail to enforce > that, the Apache board would remove us en masse from the PMC. > By this logic the Apache board should en masse remove the PMC from the HTTP Server, Subversion and Tomcat because they've failed to enforce Red Hat, Novell, Ubuntu and others to stop calling them Apache X. Clearly that hasn't happened. Let's let the Apache board speak for itself. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3825-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 15:45:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 860EB6924 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83836 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:45:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83781 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 15:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83769 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 15:45:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:45:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sradia@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:45:51 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5GFis3X052946; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:44:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308239094; bh=dtkMdDflQNJB7rDsxDk0m/OGobSMPVs1TnR/CqNDF84=; h=Cc:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=S0B6dya6FtORCbyXnkDEOwiGlX39c/3PQJObCFrKYN/XlzhiyuJzRFFehmdxq5L9D oa/LjlkrHobIQnM28rWW5+4Deu3cWJGO8wtZDiinyUv/yGJCyPIuPh8ejuwT93Nx/s FO56Ld0o41u3KT73UoQV1bwE/km15AUlR9DZFYNk= Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Message-Id: <06A09687-D5EC-4585-BC41-9F8DB2B8994E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:44:51 -0700 References: <457011.690.qm@web65508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <8B7097C4-597D-4BA4-8C69-C48F5A571AEF@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I have updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7391 with a html file that is for adding as an overview.html to the classification package. The text is mostly what was in HADOOP-5073; i have added 3 FAQs. From general-return-3826-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:02:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC4416ADD for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37629 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:02:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37572 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37564 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:02:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:02:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:02:30 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2336290bwz.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.74.70 with SMTP id t6mr856138bkj.21.1308240130216; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:01:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF9CC6C.4050306@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4DF9CC6C.4050306@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:01:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106 (project unsplit) this weekend To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d784793e150d04a5d66460 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d784793e150d04a5d66460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Ranjit Mathew wrote: > On 06/13/2011 09:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Oops, sorry about that one. I will take care of that in about 30 minutes >>> (just headed out the door now to catch a train). If someone else with >>> commit >>> access wants to, you just need to propset the externals to point to th >>> new >>> common/trunk/common/src/test/**bin instead of the old location. >>> >>> >>> Fixed the svn:externals >> > > Does it make sense for "test-patch.sh" and "smart-apply-patch.sh" to > remain "external" now that they're within the same project? > Probably not long-term... but right now the various subproject hudson builds only check out the hdfs/ or mapreduce/ subtree, so rooting the test scripts above that level would require a bit of reconfiguration. > > Currently on every "svn up" for trunk I get: > -------------------------- 8< -------------------------- > $ svn up > > Fetching external item into 'hdfs/src/test/bin' > External at revision 1136333. > > > Fetching external item into 'mapreduce/src/test/bin' > External at revision 1136333. > > At revision 1136333. > -------------------------- 8< -------------------------- > > after a little pause. > > Ranjit > > PS: I'm using "svn, version 1.6.16 (r1073529)" on Fedora 14/x86-32. > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d784793e150d04a5d66460-- From general-return-3827-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:05:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D1BF6599 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51121 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:05:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51058 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:05:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51026 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:05:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:05:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:05:43 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1803482wwi.29 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:05:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.229.150 with SMTP id h22mr1124466weq.68.1308240323274; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:05:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:05:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: Matthew Foley Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "trademarks@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Foley wrote: > I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* applying a small-number-of-patches that are > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* for high-severity-bug-fixes, and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* have been Apache-Hadoop-committed > to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a "derived wo= rk". > However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be meaning= fully > correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably has > become a derived work. > This is one reason why I think the definition of derived work in the draft of the wiki is way too broad. Something that's nothing like Hadoop at all but includes a Hadoop jar is given the same label as something with a single security patch. I think we can come up with a more useful definition of derived work. If we do that would help us draw the distinction between: 1. An Apache Hadoop release voted on the PMC, bit-for-bit identical 2. An Apache Hadoop release + backports (eg say per the above definition of backport) 3. Something that is powered by Hadoop (eg HBase) 4. Something that is not Hadoop nor powered by Hadoop (eg the way tc Server is not powered by Apache Tomcat) Note that the current document does not make an exception for security patches. I and Owen made this suggestion on this thread but the writeup we are voting on makes no such exception. > But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? =A0That's= why I'd like to > see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an example. > Googling didn't turn up anything in their public archives. This was in an email exchange I had with Shane several years ago. Hopefully their PMC can chime in. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3828-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:18:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BDC26124 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10321 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:18:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10266 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:18:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10258 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 17:18:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mattf@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:18 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5GHH4M9088420; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:17:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:17:04 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: Eric Sammer , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:17:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: AcwsSTWTIYQJQZ7XTQmfTy/j+GTvVg== Message-ID: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <24C673BE-B252-4643-BA96-EF6E4A9D978D@oracle.com> <61D08301-F6A9-4B9B-9B78-60D7D3B731A4@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A9F14549E29949648B607DB52B65F216yahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_A9F14549E29949648B607DB52B65F216yahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, sorry, but drawing a distinction between "Hadoop" and "Apache Hadoop" canno= t be done, under general trademark usage nor the Apache Trademark Policy. = Trademark usage is a specialized language just like a programming language,= and that usage violates the intended semantics of the trademark. --Matt On Jun 15, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ian Holsman > wrote: so yes .. even a simple patch makes it derived, because it is different. ...and a "dervied work" is fine. Nothing inherently wrong with the term der= ived. I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not* sayi= ng "Apache Hadoop," just "Hadoop" when the derived work is actually derived= (to any degree, as Craig R pointed out). Apache Hadoop always and forever = means the bits voted on by the PMC - no vendor can claim that - but there d= oes appear to be plenty of prior examples of "reasonable" use of ASF (and o= ther OSS organization) project names in clearly derived works. I do agree t= here should be a policy and it needs to be universally applied to be fair t= o all involved. Not to kick up the compatibility dust storm again, but people will always c= laim crazy stuff that may or may not be true. We should just ignore it. Any= day of the week someone is claiming XYZ compatible either explicitly or im= plicitly (as in client libraries for Foo Project). For cases where a vendor= makes a claim that isn't true, users will ask, we'll clarify that Apache m= akes no guarantees of derived work compatibility and doesn't certify anythi= ng (and specifically does the opposite - *NO* guarantees or warranties). Example uses I think should be fine / acceptable: YDH (even though it no longer exists, it's a good example) and Y!'s use of = Hadoop Facebook Hadoop Hadoop at eBay Hadoop at LinkedIn IBM's use of Hadoop and yes, CDH* Even if some / all of the above modify at least a single bit (and may *tech= nically* be derived works) everyone understands what they mean. As for the = confusion, the OSS community has always just said "oh, they patch some stuf= f, you should probably ask them" when confronted with vendor modified versi= ons of upstream projects; I've been involved in many of those upstream proj= ects, including a Linux distro (downstream). We should always be polite to = downstream users in redirecting them, but I think redirecting them is fine.= It's not confusing to users in my experience (we can make it a FAQ or some= thing and just point people there) as RedHat, Novell, Oracle, IBM, and many= other vendors have been happily[1] coexisting with their upstream counterp= arts for a long time. I believe we (the collective Apache Hadoop community including those that r= edistribute Hadoop bits in various forms) should focus on producing regular= , quality releases in a cooperative and constructive environment, and conti= nue to require vendors to provide the proper attribution and license inform= ation. This is in everyone's interest, vendors and direct users alike. *Disclosure: I work for Cloudera and I think this should apply to anyone an= d everyone, including my employer (with whom I obviously do not clear email= s. :)) [1] OK, maybe not always "happily" but mostly so. You know what I mean. Thanks to Steve L and others for their hard work on this one. (Sorry for the long email.) -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --_000_A9F14549E29949648B607DB52B65F216yahooinccom_-- From general-return-3829-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:40:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A47363A0 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61751 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61650 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61635 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 17:40:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:40:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mattf@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:40:05 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5GHcmQZ095372; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:38:48 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:38:48 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Thread-Index: AcwsTD9f4DRl9DlqSru4cXZqF8JmUA== Message-ID: <26BCE485-DD1A-45C5-A328-C03CEC5BC297@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org After writing my note to Eric, I realize that Eli and I are guilty of the s= ame attempt to use legal terminology in an engineering context. Craig Russell is absol= utely right. If you change one bit, it is a "derived work". However, we can still allow the trademark to be applied to that work, if it= =20 meets licensing criteria. So what we are arguing about is, "Where is the b= oundary line between something we are willing to call 'Apache Hadoop' and something that must be called 'Product XYZ Powered by Apache Hadoop'?" I'm in favor of a very strict definition. It needs to be really, really cl= ose to a PMC-approved release. But I'm open to the argument that a small number of security patches could be necessary for a viable commercial product, and that shouldn't necessarily prevent it from using the trademark. But I suggest we stop focusing on the term "derived work". Note that the=20 "Defining Apache Hadoop" draft document we are voting on doesn't use=20 that term. --Matt On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Eli Collins wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Foley wrote: > I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that > * applying a small-number-of-patches that are > * for high-severity-bug-fixes, and > * have been Apache-Hadoop-committed > to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a "derived wo= rk". > However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be meaning= fully > correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably has > become a derived work. >=20 This is one reason why I think the definition of derived work in the draft of the wiki is way too broad. Something that's nothing like Hadoop at all but includes a Hadoop jar is given the same label as something with a single security patch. I think we can come up with a more useful definition of derived work. If we do that would help us draw the distinction between: 1. An Apache Hadoop release voted on the PMC, bit-for-bit identical 2. An Apache Hadoop release + backports (eg say per the above definition of backport) 3. Something that is powered by Hadoop (eg HBase) 4. Something that is not Hadoop nor powered by Hadoop (eg the way tc Server is not powered by Apache Tomcat) Note that the current document does not make an exception for security patches. I and Owen made this suggestion on this thread but the writeup we are voting on makes no such exception. > But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? That's w= hy I'd like to > see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an example. >=20 Googling didn't turn up anything in their public archives. This was in an email exchange I had with Shane several years ago. Hopefully their PMC can chime in. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3830-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:58:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C03C66083 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98459 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98408 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55266 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 06:30:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 345493.4040.bm@omp1051.mail.bf1.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308205781; bh=mEsbP2niN6ecdD5ewfyPQxNB3HFWYu+RnlMk8w2pSnU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6sC+WwgySIszpRFNzT4jnP1JuVIOvRHvtEOCwvy8EwlJ0GD2WuPmnVmNn5AsT11riJdRh4Wlay2Bq+bAIIsViOtKMG6a4WkH75Ry4dG4MM6Frs9wgMQSl7X9hlyt9/Ei/na2n0kjVaTdBsVwL8mN2xKQ1Xkbbkm2hGNCGfOYXaQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cv/oi4rc2gMocav3X4V4Bt9pkscRI9rKTmJ4x4KvkHQ9RKShvEve5gXt584ByqDrpCHyP/5qIih60Gvb9qJXNwffxnzgdT0MByQ6J47XFY2C/ZFIh8kUp4WoSHWP9S47b+kXJEGKfAYdQHNx8N8q4Fdd8skFE3cyPpAqqTQ9wws=; Message-ID: <144508.16148.qm@web161714.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0Ib52xoVM1kZ5R7w4X41cEF1a9zxsrH8k1YXZJNx.5r1Wlo UJi0bt_qhd.3KkKF2SUIA8LXUHamCVs4TCDysX_zuSQIxoLQWq3WN1sQPUgA y._U1CVs_PorqLoFBTcX5rhTc6qlP1f73h_QHr77amexf23panG53nl8ide8 CGo632EoMwjhS7Jn_wh6e9Ht_S6gVhDmV2dvsO2ARP.Yefl7xmJmbzlxClNX xUQpzjt0WrIA.y6pJ0bwWPQeIDo_F.kO7BJ8YyXaW99t3fgDTP_VBDhGpeqW qe2kUVQdBhuJ8pgJY4CRyB6xncsMKAq3X_eKGndgkytm2WnJ5KkWbmnq_b9n pn4pYbEDxVsAU7ymuk88JZsdR0zGNrruwDp6AAuzBHAc- X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:29:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Vivekanand Vellanki Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-611399123-1308205781=:16148" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-611399123-1308205781=:16148 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --0-611399123-1308205781=:16148-- From general-return-3831-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:58:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE10A6096 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99939 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99864 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82521 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 12:43:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anuragc1978@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PEPdiGr3YllfjjiwdFXaQNuoRUbFowykKEekunaqyF4=; b=oODlqad6dqA7EMKyX6o0cDsKS1u1++e+xr0DwOZt8fHcZz6bdUr2x16dkdn8MzDHnU QW6inPc7Jp/sDA4Hlc/jsAix/S9NKANyMBjzgFN1Z57/VOWrxwLcty3e+aH3n4SLW3g6 1eTpDYreW5X3pwyRlaIINCnENhnbgvOreWlu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cxzEBHatJONl6g2GTMb4mMqJ4HbIsFUHZIB26vxao5ZfIk+/5P2eYVOpLgZT9L97nu ujB9GAE6i7QpW/qQD/kGfdWS71G5OQERBuAvllR4jZoVsM+S6q3W3f5vUFKOI1fr7OLy tUVtJx0XMlX8X0CP0gDGG6PAh0tLFZlInyRNo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:12:41 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo X From: anuragg choudhary To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6cee6e0ea0904a5d39a42 --001485f6cee6e0ea0904a5d39a42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --001485f6cee6e0ea0904a5d39a42-- From general-return-3832-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:59:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26B360AF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1498 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1439 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24820 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 17:27:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) From: "Lawrence Rosen" To: , "'Matthew Foley'" Cc: References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:27:05 -0700 Message-ID: <04e601cc2c4a$9d293fb0$d77bbf10$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcwsP0Kr/5gwYMLAS2OUV8YY3JwSXwACvm8g Content-Language: en-us I'm very confused by this thread. What does trademark law have to do = with derivative work analysis under copyright law? Is there something = specific in our FAQ or trademark policy that confuses these concepts and that we = should clean up? /Larry Please cc: trademarks@ because I'm not on the other lists. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Collins [mailto:eli@cloudera.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:05 AM > To: Matthew Foley > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; trademarks@apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page >=20 > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Foley > wrote: > > I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* applying a small-number-of-patches that are > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* for high-severity-bug-fixes, and > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* have been Apache-Hadoop-committed > > to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a > "derived work". > > However, if so many patches are applied that the result cannot be > meaningfully > > correlated with a specific Apache Hadoop release, then it probably > has > > become a derived work. > > >=20 > This is one reason why I think the definition of derived work in the > draft of the wiki is way too broad. Something that's nothing like > Hadoop at all but includes a Hadoop jar is given the same label as > something with a single security patch. I think we can come up with a > more useful definition of derived work. If we do that would help us > draw the distinction between: > 1. An Apache Hadoop release voted on the PMC, bit-for-bit identical > 2. An Apache Hadoop release + backports (eg say per the above > definition of backport) > 3. Something that is powered by Hadoop (eg HBase) > 4. Something that is not Hadoop nor powered by Hadoop (eg the way tc > Server is not powered by Apache Tomcat) >=20 > Note that the current document does not make an exception for security > patches. I and Owen made this suggestion on this thread but the > writeup we are voting on makes no such exception. >=20 > > But how do we draw a meaningful line across that big gray area? > =A0That's why I'd like to > > see specific text from one of the other projects you cited as an > example. > > >=20 > Googling didn't turn up anything in their public archives. This was in > an email exchange I had with Shane several years ago. Hopefully their > PMC can chime in. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-3833-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:59:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 548D360EB for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3249 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3129 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3119 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 17:59:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:59:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.220.47.202] (HELO rosenlaw.com) (192.220.47.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:59:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 4681 invoked by uid 12234); 16 Jun 2011 17:59:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Lawrencei) ([208.106.45.202]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.220.47.202 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Jun 2011 17:59:05 -0000 From: "Lawrence Rosen" To: Cc: Subject: Trademarks and Derivative Works Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:59:09 -0700 Message-ID: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04F1_01CC2C14.6BB6EC60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcwsTvz8+66DbjpfTs2sh+mV1G6vzQ== Content-Language: en-us ------=_NextPart_000_04F1_01CC2C14.6BB6EC60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Apache's trademarks, including the HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP trademarks, can be applied to software distributed by Apache Software Foundation. Once distributed by us, we permit that software to be redistributed by others. (E.g., Best Buy can put APACHE HADOOP on their store shelves if they want to.) Under default trademark law, those others can distribute HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP only if it is a redistribution of *our* HADOOP or APACHE HADOOP software. (That's why you can buy Jello Brand gelatin at Safeway.) Those trademarks are our names for our software. ASF is the source and origin of those software goods. Nobody else can apply those trademarks to their own software. That doesn't mean that the entire third party software distribution must be *our* software, although to claim that such a larger distribution *is* HADOOP or APACHE HADOOP would be trademark infringement. So the real question we should be asking is: How can we encourage third parties use our HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP trademarks properly to indicate that their unique third party software *contains, or works with, or includes, or is a plug-in for, or is a larger distribution of, or supports* APACHE HADOOP? Companies use lots of marketing techniques to protect their trademarks and simultaneously to let third parties help to advertise those trademarked goods and generate goodwill for them. Apache should consider doing some of the same things. It will be to our advantage to have HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP software better known and widely used throughout the world. For that purpose, we should be defining the rules we want to *encourage* third parties to follow, not arguing about derivative work analysis or voting on whether or not something is a trademark. As you look around the web for the software products you buy, which trademark marketing techniques do you like or dislike? Maybe those examples will help us focus the discussion here about our HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP trademarks. Best, /Larry Lawrence Rosen Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) 3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 Cell: 707-478-8932 Apache Software Foundation, member and counsel (www.apache.org) Open Web Foundation, board member (www.openwebfoundation.org) Stanford University, Instructor in Law Author, Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law (Prentice Hall 2004) ------=_NextPart_000_04F1_01CC2C14.6BB6EC60-- From general-return-3834-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:11:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E7ED6AC1 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29917 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29832 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29824 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:11:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:11:23 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1921061wyb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.245.4 with SMTP id n4mr1276277wer.83.1308247863519; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <26BCE485-DD1A-45C5-A328-C03CEC5BC297@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <26BCE485-DD1A-45C5-A328-C03CEC5BC297@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Foley wrote= : > After writing my note to Eric, I realize that Eli and I are guilty of the= same attempt > to use legal terminology in an engineering context. =A0Craig Russell is a= bsolutely right. > If you change one bit, it is a "derived work". > > However, we can still allow the trademark to be applied to that work, if = it > meets licensing criteria. =A0So what we are arguing about is, "Where is t= he boundary > line between something we are willing to call 'Apache Hadoop' and somethi= ng > that must be called 'Product XYZ Powered by Apache Hadoop'?" > > I'm in favor of a very strict definition. =A0It needs to be really, reall= y close to a > PMC-approved release. =A0But I'm open to the argument that a small number > of security patches could be necessary for a viable commercial product, > and that shouldn't necessarily prevent it from using the trademark. > > But I suggest we stop focusing on the term "derived work". =A0Note that t= he > "Defining Apache Hadoop" draft document we are voting on doesn't use > that term. See the section titled "Derivative Works". The term "derivative work" is used throughout the document. I think you're right that the key point here is not what is and is not a derivative work, but what can be called Hadoop. Seems like the board should have an ASF-wide stance on what can be called Apache X instead of doing this per-project. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3835-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:32:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B046378 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81872 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81735 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81715 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:32:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:32:23 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so59485pve.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.59.3 with SMTP id h3mr221572wfa.387.1308249121890; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g10sm1069624pbi.73.2011.06.16.11.31.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Trademarks and Derivative Works Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:31:58 -0700 Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > Under default trademark law, those others can distribute HADOOP and > APACHE HADOOP only if it is a redistribution of *our* HADOOP or APACHE > HADOOP software. (That's why you can buy Jello Brand gelatin at = Safeway.) > Those trademarks are our names for our software. ASF is the source and > origin of those software goods. Nobody else can apply those trademarks = to > their own software. The problem is that a rapidly growing set of companies are distributing = products that have never been released by Apache and calling them = Hadoop. The rules from HTTPD, as I understand them, are that they allow = artifacts to be called HTTPD that are releases plus patches that have = been committed. With HTTPD that has a formal specification and a very = large compatibility test suite, that works. For Hadoop without a formal = specification or test suite, we simply can't handle companies calling = things Hadoop that are thousands of patches away from our releases. We = are trying to assert that only the Apache releases can be called Hadoop. = That seems to be the best way to help the project ensure compatibility = and prevent user confusion. > It will be to our advantage to have HADOOP and APACHE > HADOOP software better known and widely used throughout the world. For = that > purpose, we should be defining the rules we want to *encourage* third > parties to follow, not arguing about derivative work analysis or = voting on > whether or not something is a trademark. I want Hadoop to be used in as many products as possible. Having a FooCo = product that is called "FooCo HugeInsights powered by Hadoop" is = absolutely great. The question is just whether they can call something = Hadoop if it isn't an Apache release. -- Owen From general-return-3836-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 19:23:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C85116E52 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83734 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:23:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83680 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:23:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83672 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 19:23:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:23:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:23:00 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5GIl82g017588 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:47:08 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 3647F43601B9; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id tfnbKdKAOertGcYD; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5GJMcNX020923; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:38 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:38 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "trademarks@apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:22:37 -0500 Subject: RE: Trademarks and Derivative Works Thread-Topic: Trademarks and Derivative Works Thread-Index: AcwsU8Iu8sHEl+9VT4yYe59PrjLaqgAASklQ Message-ID: <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C208101086D60@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> References: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Owen,=20 =46rom your response below you say the following: "We are trying to assert that only the Apache releases can be called Hado= op. That seems to be the best way to help the project ensure compatibilit= y and prevent user confusion." and " I want Hadoop to be used in as many products as possible. Having a FooC= o product that is called "FooCo HugeInsights powered by Hadoop" is absolu= tely great. The question is just whether they can call something Hadoop i= f it isn't an Apache release. -- Owen" Owen,=20 Unfortunately what you're saying is that you would only approve of compan= ies that build their products on top of Apache's release and doesn't modi= fy the Apache release.=20 To give you an example... if Acme Risk Management Company sold a product= using Hadoop to do risk analysis on a bank's portfolio, they can only sa= y "powered by Hadoop" if they build their application on top of Apache's = release. But the minute they build their solution on top of anyone else, = they would lose that right? So using Cloudera's release, which contains t= hings outside of the official Apache release would disallow them? Or if = they make their own modifications to the underlying release which isn't p= art of the official release, they could no longer make that claim? This interpretation of "powered by Hadoop" would unfortunately lead to a= s many problems as it attempts to solve. First, many choose Cloudera's release because they sell commercial suppor= t. So in choosing Cloudera's release, they would lose the ability to say = "powered by Hadoop". This diminishes the branding message. The Apache License allows for broad reuse and relicensing as long as the = company complies with Apache's T's & C's. Limiting the ability to say "p= owered by Hadoop" means that they will say that their solution uses a com= mercially supported 'derivative of Hadoop'.=20 In terms of legalese, good luck in trying to get them on a misuse of your= trademark. Cloudera, EMC, MapRTech, Datastax all offer derivatives of H= adoop. (I'm not forgetting about Yahoo!, but are they releasing their own= version as well?) The term Hadoop is used as a reference to Apache's Had= oop release. I hope that you start to see the dangers on taking a narrow approach in h= ow you define Hadoop.=20 Just IMHO. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]=20 Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:32 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org Subject: Re: Trademarks and Derivative Works On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > Under default trademark law, those others can distribute HADOOP and=20 > APACHE HADOOP only if it is a redistribution of *our* HADOOP or APACHE=20 > HADOOP software. (That's why you can buy Jello Brand gelatin at=20 > Safeway.) Those trademarks are our names for our software. ASF is the=20 > source and origin of those software goods. Nobody else can apply those=20 > trademarks to their own software. The problem is that a rapidly growing set of companies are distributing p= roducts that have never been released by Apache and calling them Hadoop. = The rules from HTTPD, as I understand them, are that they allow artifacts= to be called HTTPD that are releases plus patches that have been committ= ed. With HTTPD that has a formal specification and a very large compatibi= lity test suite, that works. For Hadoop without a formal specification or= test suite, we simply can't handle companies calling things Hadoop that = are thousands of patches away from our releases. We are trying to assert = that only the Apache releases can be called Hadoop. That seems to be the = best way to help the project ensure compatibility and prevent user confus= ion. > It will be to our advantage to have HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP software=20 > better known and widely used throughout the world. For that purpose,=20 > we should be defining the rules we want to *encourage* third parties=20 > to follow, not arguing about derivative work analysis or voting on=20 > whether or not something is a trademark. I want Hadoop to be used in as many products as possible. Having a FooCo = product that is called "FooCo HugeInsights powered by Hadoop" is absolute= ly great. The question is just whether they can call something Hadoop if = it isn't an Apache release. -- Owen The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3837-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:28:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 707F36781 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8171 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8116 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8108 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:28:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:28:11 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c94.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.94]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5GKRGaM046737 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308256037; bh=ZXvTCco2yH7CdM+bXfFczIK1NSmfzkBsbqxJ6CRP52M=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=GtERTbXaSrvqxhSocUbXqoCSTOb7T8zxdK4oB61ovHkYvHRN6dpgDq7X2SC8//2kZ l1H9z8Yvas+rNaUcDUH44XCB0+tjQjmsJ+TG28v4ze0B1ez8i8SVVJL8nAui3w3xYc SemfFEoyaIUsaToOjEUNjJo5O2qc/vnnzoCOMExo= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:27:16 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5,2 > On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >=20 >> All, >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them all >> on a page, here: >>=20 >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >>=20 >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round = of voting, >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important = thing is >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >>=20 >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >>=20 >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, = you don't >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote = will >> automatically roll over to your next choice. >>=20 >> -- Owen >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3838-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 21:29:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8D3D6282 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77318 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:13:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77272 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:13:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77263 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 21:13:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:13:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jwfbean@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:13:16 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so2104318wyb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:12:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.6.137 with SMTP id y9mr1417652wes.47.1308258774923; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.29.7 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:12:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Jeff Bean To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf302ad6428dbaf504a5dabb50 --20cf302ad6428dbaf504a5dabb50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5,6,2,4,3,1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > 5,2 > > > On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > >> All, > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all > >> on a page, here: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > >> > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, > >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is > >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > >> > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > >> > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't > >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > >> automatically roll over to your next choice. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > >> > >> > > > > --20cf302ad6428dbaf504a5dabb50-- From general-return-3839-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 23:12:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D8066070 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52891 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:12:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52814 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52806 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 23:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chad@cloudera.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:12:39 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so1370334pwi.35 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.245.16 with SMTP id s16mr298508wfh.139.1308265938034; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.12.55] (173-167-109-121-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.167.109.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x16sm2095858wfc.10.2011.06.16.16.12.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DFA8DCE.7060508@cloudera.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:14 -0700 From: Chad Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110603 Thunderbird/5.0b1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 5,2 Cheers Chad From general-return-3840-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 00:36:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDF6B6F7E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48032 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 00:36:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47921 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 00:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47913 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 00:36:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.172 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:15 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c94.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.94]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5H0ZOZX038544; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308270925; bh=2uppDKpLS6/r3DqBeHWEUjLYhjY4Nu2+o3eHzPJrRJo=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=j//3kRlGJsEo25PYkWvHMQcswOXVdSmIfqSTJdOjhQV8lmZ/jHyWvBtlPzce14pXw TcYNFb/C4nhgPjKT+I4lfgSd6ZSAvSM1whr/hAt6ei06ZROndEmhSnG2vJQ6NLFh5L ne2daD/Gwl2+q4Hh3C9BcllUrIMGsjFYAqISX2Vs= Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:35:24 -0700 Cc: Matthew Foley , "trademarks@apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5069B9B8-4255-4810-9A22-4D7081FA3A3B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <090F2993-B9AA-410F-AD99-7AC047FFC974@apache.org> <54668CDE-443D-4AF1-B17A-0497D0CDCC8D@yahoo-inc.com> <26BCE485-DD1A-45C5-A328-C03CEC5BC297@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) If the board does have a stance, I'd love to hear it. That could = usefully end this discussion. Absent that, it seems reasonable for the PMC to make a decision in this = area. Each project has different use cases and ecosystems, so it may = not be reasonable to expect a one size fits all solution. I see no = reason not to make a local proposal, the board can always clarify. On Jun 16, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Matthew Foley = wrote: >> After writing my note to Eric, I realize that Eli and I are guilty of = the same attempt >> to use legal terminology in an engineering context. Craig Russell is = absolutely right. >> If you change one bit, it is a "derived work". >>=20 >> However, we can still allow the trademark to be applied to that work, = if it >> meets licensing criteria. So what we are arguing about is, "Where is = the boundary >> line between something we are willing to call 'Apache Hadoop' and = something >> that must be called 'Product XYZ Powered by Apache Hadoop'?" >>=20 >> I'm in favor of a very strict definition. It needs to be really, = really close to a >> PMC-approved release. But I'm open to the argument that a small = number >> of security patches could be necessary for a viable commercial = product, >> and that shouldn't necessarily prevent it from using the trademark. >>=20 >> But I suggest we stop focusing on the term "derived work". Note that = the >> "Defining Apache Hadoop" draft document we are voting on doesn't use >> that term. >=20 > See the section titled "Derivative Works". The term "derivative work" > is used throughout the document. I think you're right that the key > point here is not what is and is not a derivative work, but what can > be called Hadoop. >=20 > Seems like the board should have an ASF-wide stance on what can be > called Apache X instead of doing this per-project. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-3841-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 04:26:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7058A4702 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17509 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 04:26:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17169 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 04:26:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13671 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 04:17:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of d.giriprasad@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Y9kbLUW+wsriZwnkkY4uNS4ivA4OHaRakceuIdpVMNE=; b=HJZEEguwyNnGl4VIop7NKe67Z4fXg9PzUI9QmsuDpWGZWF3K4LaCMmbkaeH1+4mmON OxKhQ0NfU51sRH9bgfyJTUPnXB9JFKTviB/8YQFiSvoSGJE1yig+SGkAmx8r91lAhw9O UpSsJgTqJUAvLrPcsKoP64YxRq5DuHmFQ3fZY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hTlk4Ol21cQCNKIxsA1HzZI0cPaFDpxTHxPYfEBWUpAmk/4GilsSijeJKaA5j1DqJP fl6ir/hO07te0IuDx2s3IPzI3qzQ5hJuO2M/nb7B/RiAD3yMbyEYZsrcug9s5131Ou2v xDfuh4aPO2/pCp9QaW9J/AX3eWCNzHJCCSsEo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:47:22 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] Powered by logo From: Giri Prasad Reddy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I liked 4 a lot. My preference is: 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 Regards, giri From general-return-3842-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 06:12:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EEE24BA1 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93992 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 06:12:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93940 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 06:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93932 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 06:12:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:12:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of guosxu@163.com designates 220.181.13.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [220.181.13.49] (HELO m13-49.163.com) (220.181.13.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:12:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=DYquZ5tfTy3dhNOnkdgsWPgBXlDo3FPXa7 fbcZhQuEY=; b=nENwGxePBqxS6TqetVS+U/42p+lF9Lp3QgRTXKcHctQ6mK717e 9phmO9nPBdLOh4ZZTMTxLviNyLAjLjGznRdQOMeW138ThW2ERKdKe1AeYLTLbfVy lhMdaGvevm9s7LoqlA6TMa+Ey3ThhmTL0kORX/Ptkzpomi/IjNkYSs86I= Received: from guosxu ( [218.242.218.34] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr49 (Coremail) ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:11:46 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:11:46 +0800 (CST) From: =?GBK?B?ufnLs9Dx?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <6fe0d887.7743.1309c3a0722.Coremail.guosxu@163.com> In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Subject: Re:[VOTE] Powered by Logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [218.242.218.34] X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 110420(13372.3725.3724) Copyright (c) 2002-2011 www.mailtech.cn 163com X-CM-TRANSID:McGowKBLvdcj8PpNAQwSAA--.3141W X-CM-SenderInfo: pjxr25rx6rljoofrz/1tbiFANhd00vIYIoQgABsr X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My vote (in order of course): 2, 6, 4, 3, 5, 1. At 2011-06-15 11:19:18=A3=AC"Owen OMalley" wrote: >All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them = all on a page, here: > >http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > >Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vot= ing, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/= Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN OR= DER* that you would like them. > >My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > >In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don= 't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will = automatically roll over to your next choice. > >-- Owen > > From general-return-3843-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 07:18:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69A4A4AE9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51175 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 07:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51096 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 07:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51085 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 07:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:18:23 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c94.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.94]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5H7Huvo081359 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308295077; bh=5CldhLlutTelewrHTm+aeiwWCUl6MdMbGdNJjmceChI=; h=From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date: Message-Id:To:Mime-Version; b=YGZ8mzBNcgTp8lf8N022HUMg5LvL+Oh2Nf4oD/HGAxClAZqHBQ0LwhbM7fzYMeTQV JkSMuKkfqtZRtS4mMW3ibNKmIGFxXLXbiiiRZsleCOeXsteVEM/Zl9Inyy2l36Hy/L TxFWrqEAprZYklfHcSS0gplEavC9+Jwwf3G7Rnpw= From: Eric Baldeschwieler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:17:56 -0700 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Hi Folks, I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next = release of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big = Hadoop projects, including: - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] - Already merged into trunk - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into mainline = [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] - This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to close = out the remaining issues All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to = combine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache = release, perhaps 0.23. We think the best way to accomplish that is to = finish the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from = trunk. Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this = new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test = and burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release = such as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). We have Yahoo!s = support for this substantial investment because this new release will = have a great combination of new features for small and very large sites = alike: - New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] - Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to = experiment with new namenode approaches - Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to = experiment with new processing frameworks I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for = the community. I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and = hopefully folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together = this new release. Feedback please? Thanks, E14 From general-return-3844-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 07:37:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB1154CA7 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84877 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 07:37:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84530 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 07:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83845 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 07:36:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:36:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:36:41 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so386221fxm.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g1e0TJaxszoOUTkPwfpsl/uOp3RuOXqhKjmaqeiz2ks=; b=wV90O/zdiBqHsfYL6aM9+nja58nCAen3xU7a0EHxWATXXtzz+o7IjSjJHxgqtfVxwk PSQyZtNCpLYh5LWmGG+ag+edvER4CiAdU9z7DJ8B3P78fKM8EUmUmWKR5Hips72KShlQ 2x8Iq2SQRw+HU86O2Ho4+c2VzAt4BeDDrJMJM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p8XXCKAxIeDnuPK6eQLqu+IiysfTujNbFj6JU6VL/JtuIrDjP59MMzj7Wbyep9IEwF Wxi6oVPR2YqAWMPHScHmxR8nEd4dNExVI1YBSgb+z8U00yzTRmKsxeWxA4lXfayyNM7S e+saihia74n9DWIx3TOBhMeiN0pUjb036bfXM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.81.80 with SMTP id w16mr2118420fak.65.1308296181736; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.86.77 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:36:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't really scalable. -ryan On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next releas= e of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. > > The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big Hado= op projects, including: > > - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] > =A0- Already merged into trunk > > - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] > =A0- Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk > > - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into mainline = [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] > =A0- This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to close = out the remaining issues > > All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to com= bine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache relea= se, perhaps 0.23. =A0We think the best way to accomplish that is to finish = the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from trunk. > > Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this new= release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and b= urn in process. =A0The result of that will be another stable release such a= s 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =A0We have Yahoo!s support= for this substantial investment because this new release will have a great= combination of new features for small and very large sites alike: > =A0- New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] > =A0- Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to experime= nt with new namenode approaches > =A0- Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to e= xperiment with new processing frameworks > > I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for th= e community. =A0I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and hopefully = folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together this new rele= ase. =A0Feedback please? > > Thanks, > > E14 > > From general-return-3845-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 08:14:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C2641E0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36626 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 08:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36571 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 08:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36563 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 08:14:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:13:59 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so643889vxd.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.100.74 with SMTP id ew10mr2638554vdb.283.1308298418069; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:13:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:13:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [89.96.138.154] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:13:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c69478220104a5e3f623 --20cf3071c69478220104a5e3f623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > > - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] > > - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk > --20cf3071c69478220104a5e3f623-- From general-return-3846-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 11:02:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC0A94849 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60997 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 11:02:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60927 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 11:02:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60908 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 11:02:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:02:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:02:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1B31BA9A7 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:02:16 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DJSbGZMYL2v8 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:02:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51391BA97A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:02:15 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308913318.01421@rATPq0mSPaq/VZhMIChwyQ Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5HB1vOV015292 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:01:57 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:01:53 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5HB1vOV015292 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote: >> >> Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be >> finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues. >> >> also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke >> the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache >> Hadoop build"? > > I think such a T-shirt should be forcefully worn on any person who did > just that. Here you go with the poster: http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/hadoop-components/hadoop-ops/doc/breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp?revision=8630 I can add it to hadoop-common SVN for people to work on... From general-return-3847-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 13:20:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 232C5421F for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72046 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 13:20:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71992 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 13:20:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71984 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 13:20:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:20:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.49] (HELO smtp3.4emm.com) (69.18.222.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:20:47 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB03.4emm.local ([192.168.161.134]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:20:25 -0400 From: Doug Meil To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:21:38 -0400 Subject: RE: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: AcwswQPbKF7N4UQqTHqHbmTupD/U6wAMHJQA Message-ID: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5952823BEDB40@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 on what Ryan said. -----Original Message----- From: Ryan Rawson [mailto:ryanobjc@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:36 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read performance. = The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess they aren't runnin= g "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and running HDFS-918 as we= ll. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't really scalable. -ryan On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next releas= e of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. > > The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big Hado= op projects, including: > > - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] > =A0- Already merged into trunk > > - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] > =A0- Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk > > - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into=20 > mainline [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] > =A0- This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to close= =20 > out the remaining issues > > All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to com= bine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache relea= se, perhaps 0.23. =A0We think the best way to accomplish that is to finish = the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from trunk. > > Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this new= release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and b= urn in process. =A0The result of that will be another stable release such a= s 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =A0We have Yahoo!s support= for this substantial investment because this new release will have a great= combination of new features for small and very large sites alike: > =A0- New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] > =A0- Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to=20 > experiment with new namenode approaches > =A0- Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to=20 > experiment with new processing frameworks > > I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for th= e community. =A0I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and hopefully = folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together this new rele= ase. =A0Feedback please? > > Thanks, > > E14 > > From general-return-3848-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 14:17:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFB224AA8 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67587 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67537 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67529 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 14:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.172 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of arunc@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:17:35 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5HEFwsX057871; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:15:58 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:15:48 -0700 Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: Acws+RPlMNysOuyuR6ehLH41N0fBKg== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG NR = effort. Are folks ok with this? thanks, Arun Sent from my iPhone On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for > users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. >=20 > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >=20 >>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>=20 From general-return-3849-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 14:30:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6811C4E9D for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85580 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:30:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85509 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85501 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 14:30:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.93.165.11] (HELO cse-mail.unl.edu) (129.93.165.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:30:41 +0000 Received: from cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu (cse-barracuda.unl.edu [129.93.164.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse-mail.unl.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5HEUENI018382 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:30:19 -0500 (CDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1308321014-034b5c117d287600001-IjwG86 Received: from cse.unl.edu (cse.unl.edu [129.93.165.2]) by cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu with ESMTP id e7gzXJD69NvRGCkc for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0500 (CDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bbockelm@cse.unl.edu X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 129.93.165.2 Received: from pcp088901pcs.unl.edu (pcp088901pcs.unl.edu [129.93.158.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse.unl.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5HEUEVL020908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 129.93.158.16 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Brian Bockelman X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:30:13 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Barracuda-Connect: cse.unl.edu[129.93.165.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1308321014 X-Barracuda-URL: http://cse-barracuda.unl.edu:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.1 at cse-mail X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.66338 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (cse-mail.unl.edu [129.93.165.11]); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:30:20 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Ryan, Eric, Just looked at those two for the first time in awhile. - HDFS-918 (now 1323?) doesn't seem like it's too controversial, but = does seem like there's a bit of validation left. - HDFS-347 has a long, contentious history. However, it seems that most = of the strong objections have been cleared up. Is there anyone left who = objects to it, now that it doesn't appear to bypass security? Finally, I see Todd has posted HDFS-2080 claiming some sizable = performance improvements. Would it be possible that could finish in = time for release? As a site which heavily uses random reads and high-throughput reads, I'm = very excited for this release! Brian On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read > performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess > they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and > running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't > really scalable. >=20 > -ryan >=20 > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> Hi Folks, >>=20 >> I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next = release of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. >>=20 >> The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big = Hadoop projects, including: >>=20 >> - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] >> - Already merged into trunk >>=20 >> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>=20 >> - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into = mainline [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] >> - This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to = close out the remaining issues >>=20 >> All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to = combine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache = release, perhaps 0.23. We think the best way to accomplish that is to = finish the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from = trunk. >>=20 >> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this = new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test = and burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release = such as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). We have Yahoo!s = support for this substantial investment because this new release will = have a great combination of new features for small and very large sites = alike: >> - New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] >> - Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to = experiment with new namenode approaches >> - Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to = experiment with new processing frameworks >>=20 >> I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release = for the community. I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and = hopefully folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together = this new release. Feedback please? >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> E14 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3850-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 14:38:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A67F42DF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97243 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:38:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97185 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97177 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 14:38:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:07 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1694448qwj.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:37:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4nGgpYuR1VkQ9FqG/3/kjIwjB4AsG3gYDtses1ewg3A=; b=LMOgbxqEo/ZJPQpD59cEUS5pLWDCUaqMQFAIvy5YrjAoTOzHkvsbdFdm6RSi+wDh+z Q4FKX24k6FZEi69f+nlp5xlmMoXVK+2GlgYnH3rwz6TFz0+Q+sPoPYQi49fWd9CWSCow FtqIKWU0fmToIRjkvBKvmwODRD6wbUZpH6DEs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ug06oIufYewQ0mP8ekI1Pc189A4gERvzvPsDBdbWwFggYuA1Wann/PwVoTYoIOUY6r uSPdXA9/uVlw2t9CYlA5bCtyg+rAKIVNo+wgoW6tlpZZpj8Wa80dK5Q3k4mXUO3cFFpx F4jqWa9BHm/woy8AOwq9toJSo2HFA7lIoF93o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.32.94 with SMTP id b30mr619278qad.302.1308321466932; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:37:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.60.73 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:37:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> References: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:37:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I can look at 1323 (hdfs-918's successor) next week/weekend and clear the test problems, thanks Todd for updating the patch to current trunk. 1323 is only filechannel-pooling, which is much less disruptive than refactoring everything in the DN to be event-driven. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Brian Bockelman wr= ote: > Hi Ryan, Eric, > > Just looked at those two for the first time in awhile. > - HDFS-918 (now 1323?) doesn't seem like it's too controversial, but does= seem like there's a bit of validation left. > - HDFS-347 has a long, contentious history. =A0However, it seems that mos= t of the strong objections have been cleared up. =A0Is there anyone left wh= o objects to it, now that it doesn't appear to bypass security? > > Finally, I see Todd has posted HDFS-2080 claiming some sizable performanc= e improvements. =A0Would it be possible that could finish in time for relea= se? > > As a site which heavily uses random reads and high-throughput reads, I'm = very excited for this release! > > Brian > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > >> HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read >> performance. =A0The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess >> they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and >> running HDFS-918 as well. =A0Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't >> really scalable. >> >> -ryan >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> wrote: >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next rele= ase of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. >>> >>> The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big Ha= doop projects, including: >>> >>> - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] >>> =A0- Already merged into trunk >>> >>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>> =A0- Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>> >>> - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into mainlin= e [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] >>> =A0- This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to clos= e out the remaining issues >>> >>> All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to c= ombine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache rel= ease, perhaps 0.23. =A0We think the best way to accomplish that is to finis= h the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from trunk. >>> >>> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this n= ew release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and= burn in process. =A0The result of that will be another stable release such= as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =A0We have Yahoo!s suppo= rt for this substantial investment because this new release will have a gre= at combination of new features for small and very large sites alike: >>> =A0- New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] >>> =A0- Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to experi= ment with new namenode approaches >>> =A0- Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to= experiment with new processing frameworks >>> >>> I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for = the community. =A0I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and hopefull= y folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together this new re= lease. =A0Feedback please? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> E14 >>> >>> > > From general-return-3851-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 14:43:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18C7E4608 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13711 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13619 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 14:43:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13608 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 14:43:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:43:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of arunc@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:43:29 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5HEgm1T015588; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:42:48 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:42:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: Acws/NOUhs6xCR1yS/u5cgfszrw8bg== Message-ID: References: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> In-Reply-To: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan & Brian, All that needs to be included in a release branch after the branch is cut i= s that someone needs to convince the RM to include it. It should be fairly = straight-forward. OTOH, if it's in trunk when the branch is made this discussion is moot. So, please provide necessary feedback to the RM when the branch is made and= let's focus on a high-level goal for a next release off trunk in this thre= ad. Makes sense? thanks, Arun=20 Sent from my iPhone On Jun 17, 2011, at 8:01 PM, "Brian Bockelman" wrote= : > Hi Ryan, Eric, >=20 > Just looked at those two for the first time in awhile. > - HDFS-918 (now 1323?) doesn't seem like it's too controversial, but does= seem like there's a bit of validation left. > - HDFS-347 has a long, contentious history. However, it seems that most = of the strong objections have been cleared up. Is there anyone left who ob= jects to it, now that it doesn't appear to bypass security? >=20 > Finally, I see Todd has posted HDFS-2080 claiming some sizable performanc= e improvements. Would it be possible that could finish in time for release= ? >=20 > As a site which heavily uses random reads and high-throughput reads, I'm = very excited for this release! >=20 > Brian >=20 > On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >=20 >> HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read >> performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess >> they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and >> running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't >> really scalable. >>=20 >> -ryan >>=20 >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> wrote: >>> Hi Folks, >>>=20 >>> I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next rele= ase of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. >>>=20 >>> The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big Ha= doop projects, including: >>>=20 >>> - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] >>> - Already merged into trunk >>>=20 >>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>>=20 >>> - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into mainlin= e [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] >>> - This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to close o= ut the remaining issues >>>=20 >>> All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to c= ombine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache rel= ease, perhaps 0.23. We think the best way to accomplish that is to finish = the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from trunk. >>>=20 >>> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this n= ew release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and= burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release such a= s 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). We have Yahoo!s support f= or this substantial investment because this new release will have a great c= ombination of new features for small and very large sites alike: >>> - New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] >>> - Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to experimen= t with new namenode approaches >>> - Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability to ex= periment with new processing frameworks >>>=20 >>> I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for = the community. I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and hopefully = folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together this new rele= ase. Feedback please? >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>>=20 >>> E14 >>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3852-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:31:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2880E4D1B for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61476 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61410 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61402 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:49 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:31:48 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this = new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test = and burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release = such as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =20 I'd consider 0.20.203 pseudo-stable. It has some significant = regressions on non-Linux platforms due to libhadoop.so being a dumping = ground for all compiled code. On OS X, hadoop actually lies about = things now. Nine months of testing is useless for those folks if the = outcome is another 0.20.203. > I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for = the community. I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and = hopefully folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together = this new release. Feedback please? For .23, we desperately need to have libhadoop tell the Java = code what it supports rather than just assuming that all the = functionality is present if the library loads. I pretty much consider = this a blocking issue.= From general-return-3853-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:33:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86E7A44B9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63483 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63430 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63418 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:33:18 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:33:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:33:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:17 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43D4BB64-1B14-45F6-941B-B65F31636266@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read > performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess > they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and > running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't > really scalable. Isn't "random read [on HDFS]" and "smarter sites" in the same = breath an oxymoron? From general-return-3854-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:34:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CC84C17 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66290 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66228 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66220 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:34:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:34:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:34:40 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1291839bwz.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.233.15 with SMTP id jw15mr1871172bkb.48.1308332059330; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:34:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> References: <39C6561C-9CB6-4BA5-BE31-C269590B7842@cse.unl.edu> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:33:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Brian Bockelman wro= te: > > Hi Ryan, Eric, > > Just looked at those two for the first time in awhile. > - HDFS-918 (now 1323?) doesn't seem like it's too controversial, but does= seem like there's a bit of validation left. Yes, 1323 and also 1148 would be "nice to haves", but neither is ready to go, yet. Though I really want to improve HBase performance, I also tend to be fairly conservative on how much testing these things should need before getting checked in (unless they can be completely pluggable). The good news is we did get 941 in last week, and that's a real nice improvement. > - HDFS-347 has a long, contentious history. =A0However, it seems that mos= t of the strong objections have been cleared up. =A0Is there anyone left wh= o objects to it, now that it doesn't appear to bypass security? It still has a way to go to be pushed over the finish line. I don't foresee it happening for this release. > Finally, I see Todd has posted HDFS-2080 claiming some sizable performanc= e improvements. =A0Would it be possible that could finish in time for relea= se? HDFS-2080 has very good bang-for-the-buck in the gains-per-complexity ratio, especially compared to 347. It could also be made completely pluggable, since it's just a new implementation of BlockReader. So it might be feasible to include but not enabled by default. But, I wouldn't block the 0.23 (or any other) release on including these things. If they're done and look low-risk at an early enough date, I'll do my best to convince the RM to include them, but if they haven't had enough testing, then off to the next release with em. -Todd > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > > > HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read > > performance. =A0The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess > > they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing and > > running HDFS-918 as well. =A0Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't > > really scalable. > > > > -ryan > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > > wrote: > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> I'd like to start a conversation on mainline planning and the next rel= ease of Apache Hadoop beyond 0.22. > >> > >> The Yahoo! Hadoop team has been working hard to complete several big H= adoop projects, including: > >> > >> - HDFS Federation [HDFS-1052] > >> =A0- Already merged into trunk > >> > >> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] > >> =A0- Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk > >> > >> - The merging of our previous work on Hadoop with security into mainli= ne [http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W] > >> =A0- This is mostly done, but owen and others are doing a scrub to clo= se out the remaining issues > >> > >> All of these projects are now reaching a place where we would like to = combine them with the good work already in 0.22 and put out a new apache re= lease, perhaps 0.23. =A0We think the best way to accomplish that is to fini= sh the merge in the next few weeks and then cut a release from trunk. > >> > >> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this = new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test an= d burn in process. =A0The result of that will be another stable release suc= h as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =A0We have Yahoo!s supp= ort for this substantial investment because this new release will have a gr= eat combination of new features for small and very large sites alike: > >> =A0- New Write Pipeline - HBase support [also in 0.21 & 0.22] > >> =A0- Federation - Scale up to larger clusters and the ability to exper= iment with new namenode approaches > >> =A0- Next Gen MapReduce - Scaleup, performance improvements, ability t= o experiment with new processing frameworks > >> > >> I think this effort will produce a great new Apache Hadoop release for= the community. =A0I'm starting this thread to collect feedback and hopeful= ly folks' endorsement for merging in MR-279 and putting together this new r= elease. =A0Feedback please? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> E14 > >> > >> > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3855-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:17:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 895CD4110 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43241 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:17:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43155 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43147 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:17:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:49 +0000 Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id x66G1g00A1vXlb8536HVH7; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:29 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id x6HT1g00N3QAh8g3d6HUJj; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:17:29 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5HIHQi8022461 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:17:26 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5HIHP0X022460 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:17:25 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:17:25 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Message-ID: <20110617181725.GB22372@linspire.com> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:01PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote: > >>> >>> Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be >>> finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues. >>> >>> also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke >>> the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache >>> Hadoop build"? >> >> I think such a T-shirt should be forcefully worn on any person who did >> just that. > > Here you go with the poster: > http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/hadoop-components/hadoop-ops/doc/breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp?revision=8630 > > I can add it to hadoop-common SVN for people to work on... Please do, by all means :) ! From general-return-3856-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:22:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D1294CB7 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52995 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:22:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52854 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52846 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:22:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:22:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:22:02 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1349137bwz.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.19.74 with SMTP id z10mr1938735bka.183.1308334901638; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:21:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.37.79 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:21:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:21:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG NR effort. > > Are folks ok with this? +1. It would be an honor to fix bugs for you, Arun. -Todd > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > >> NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for >> users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >> >>>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>> > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3857-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 19:00:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EC0448D9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:00:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10590 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29238 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:13:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to Konstantin@Boudnik.org using -f Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:12:35 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Message-ID: <20110617181235.GA22372@linspire.com> References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:01PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote: > >>> >>> Regarding the vote, I think the discussion here is interesting and should be >>> finalised before the vote. It's worth resolving the issues. >>> >>> also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke >>> the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache >>> Hadoop build"? >> >> I think such a T-shirt should be forcefully worn on any person who did >> just that. > > Here you go with the poster: > http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/hadoop-components/hadoop-ops/doc/breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp?revision=8630 > > I can add it to hadoop-common SVN for people to work on... Please do :)! From general-return-3858-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:27:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 553204A30 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46043 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:27:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45972 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:27:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45964 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:27:47 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:27:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:27:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:27:43 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this = new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test = and burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release = such as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). =20 >=20 >=20 > I'd consider 0.20.203 pseudo-stable.=20 Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that = is metrics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable = for anyone but Yahoo!.= From general-return-3859-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:14:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 208A94859 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42218 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:14:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42162 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:14:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42153 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:14:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:14:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bcwalrus@cloudera.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:14:09 +0000 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so204638gyb.35 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.108.14 with SMTP id k14mr3091410anm.89.1308359628290; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:13:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.146.12 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: bc Wong Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:13:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 5, 6, 2. Cheers, bc From general-return-3860-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 02:03:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1788682F for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74497 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 02:03:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74429 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 02:03:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74420 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 02:03:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:03:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rajive@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:03:35 +0000 Received: from bringlake.corp.yahoo.com (bringlake.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.56]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5I22pfu040438 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308362571; bh=ScavgmsmK31vv+EL6/irtONHPh21ZzuHOfpjZjTlcFA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=oyvnMCP6eW7ScC4Rn1yReQxl98Ixjnh1igXY3VBfEMxWV/LDTe7sVm08cT2JEoPV1 bPpDEoicpyql8ZCaCryVbkdyy4AJZnZZ8aCpQoSQZnYCHshyuxVPBXsz2oVdBw5lZZ 8sAoKq0Cl2GdX5ssMXkAcBa+El3ND79l52KH33jw= Received: from bringlake.corp.yahoo.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bringlake.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5I22pHE020964 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0700 Received: (from rajive@localhost) by bringlake.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id p5I22prA020963 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: bringlake.corp.yahoo.com: rajive set sender to rajive@yahoo-inc.com using -f Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:02:51 -0700 From: Rajiv Chittajallu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Message-ID: <20110618020251.GB16097@bringlake.corp.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Rajiv Chittajallu References: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> Organization: Y! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Allen Wittenauer wrote on 06/17/11 at 13:27:43 -0700: > > Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that is metrics= =2E So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable for anyone= but Yahoo!. Did you try to use the new metrics framework? Are you complaining cause there is no port of ganglia metrics module to metrics V2?=20 Its pluggable and you can choose to disable it if you want to.=20 All metrics and status information is available via jmx.=20 Multiple sinks and filters, more importantly you can refresh metrics configs without restarting the process.=20 -rajive --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFN/AdLobJMer3p0EoRAuFsAJ0WlgTkfeqYp6r6NplTtRmb/jd+QACcDIZ3 nkd1O0YlY+iMbaKRF1dDULg= =lZa/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW-- From general-return-3861-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 02:15:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0BDD6BE0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81289 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 02:15:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81220 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 02:15:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81211 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 02:15:03 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:15:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.100.72]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 02:15:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <20110618020251.GB16097@bringlake.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:15:02 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1EB86860-E788-40E8-893D-9543C20F72E8@apache.org> References: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> <20110618020251.GB16097@bringlake.corp.yahoo.com> To: , Rajiv Chittajallu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Rajiv Chittajallu wrote: > Allen Wittenauer wrote on 06/17/11 at 13:27:43 -0700: >>=20 >> Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that = is metrics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable = for anyone but Yahoo!. >=20 > Did you try to use the new metrics framework? Are you complaining > cause there is no port of ganglia metrics module to metrics V2?=20 Like 80-90%+ of the Hadoop sites that gather metrics, yes, we = use Ganglia.=20 > Its pluggable and you can choose to disable it if you want to.=20 > All metrics and status information is available via jmx.=20 > Multiple sinks and filters, more importantly you can refresh > metrics configs without restarting the process.=20 But first we need to switch to a new metrics infrastructure. = This wouldn't have been so bad if the release notes actually had said = "You know your current metrics system? Yeah, toss it because we just = broke everything." I'm certainly not a fan of Ganglia, but this sort of unexpected = breakage is very, very bad.= From general-return-3862-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 04:42:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37EA26D4D for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 04:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38136 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 04:42:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37411 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 04:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37402 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 04:42:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 04:42:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.172 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of arunc@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 04:42:40 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5I4gC9v094597 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:42:13 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:42:04 -0700 Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: AcwtchbSroOV+iaXSzO254S3IsLb+Q== Message-ID: <03019E1C-61F7-410E-9978-140C00D91E45@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> <20110618020251.GB16097@bringlake.corp.yahoo.com> <1EB86860-E788-40E8-893D-9543C20F72E8@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1EB86860-E788-40E8-893D-9543C20F72E8@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Allen, Can we pls focus on the next release here, on this thread? Please provide your valuable f/b to the RM abt stuff you'd like to see in t= he next release. thanks, Arun Sent from my iPhone On Jun 18, 2011, at 7:45 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >=20 > On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Rajiv Chittajallu wrote: >=20 >> Allen Wittenauer wrote on 06/17/11 at 13:27:43 -0700: >>>=20 >>> Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that is me= trics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable for any= one but Yahoo!. >>=20 >> Did you try to use the new metrics framework? Are you complaining >> cause there is no port of ganglia metrics module to metrics V2?=20 >=20 > Like 80-90%+ of the Hadoop sites that gather metrics, yes, we use Gang= lia.=20 >=20 >> Its pluggable and you can choose to disable it if you want to.=20 >> All metrics and status information is available via jmx.=20 >> Multiple sinks and filters, more importantly you can refresh >> metrics configs without restarting the process.=20 >=20 > But first we need to switch to a new metrics infrastructure. This wou= ldn't have been so bad if the release notes actually had said "You know you= r current metrics system? Yeah, toss it because we just broke everything." >=20 > I'm certainly not a fan of Ganglia, but this sort of unexpected breaka= ge is very, very bad. From general-return-3863-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 06:11:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2E576FF1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64851 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 06:11:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64738 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 06:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64728 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 06:11:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:11:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:11:39 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c87.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.87]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p5I6AY7Q094629 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:10:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308377435; bh=+yRlYQBEJCdtrlVNFzr+WnSgXwffZieS1ybdpGPEa/U=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=qOUi30pM2POHjje6KlcDZvNpFLNY/c8HHXDVUQqlAGpPk9Qx9COBzAtqyg1b9iR3U y6JlDBf6Zc7OPYaHcUluPZT7BIRmWrAVzWdblvpFc2vxyIoFIUUgyAMSSuENa7eFiQ g0YgHE93Uxr4UBPdSxgEoFDbYCgMMkpbB10k2YlM= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <43D4BB64-1B14-45F6-941B-B65F31636266@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:10:33 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <76BC80C1-7A3B-4B80-93C2-DBF1EF3152F0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <43D4BB64-1B14-45F6-941B-B65F31636266@apache.org> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Hey Allen, I agree with you that we should avoid future regressions like this. I = think the tradeoff that got security working well on one heavily used = platform was the right one for hadoop-with-security, but I'll be sure to = raise such issues for discussion in the future as soon as I become aware = of them. I agree that we should think about how to generalize the security work = for other platforms. That work is just waiting for someone to jump = in.... On ganglia and the metrics framework, it would be great if you could put = your head together with rajive and come up with a joint proposal on what = docs / code is needed to fix the regression in a clean way. That sounds = like something we should be thinking about fixing in the 20 line and all = future releases. thanks, E14 On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >=20 >> HDFS-918 and HDFS-347 are absolutely critical for random read >> performance. The smarter sites are already running HDFS-347 (I guess >> they aren't running "Hadoop" then?), and soon they will be testing = and >> running HDFS-918 as well. Opening 1 socket for every read just isn't >> really scalable. >=20 > Isn't "random read [on HDFS]" and "smarter sites" in the same = breath an oxymoron? >=20 >=20 From general-return-3864-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 06:51:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A7FA64D1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81557 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 06:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81329 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 06:51:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81321 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 06:51:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:51:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:51:09 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c87.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.87]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5I6ofbv057275 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:50:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308379842; bh=5e3fxNbGO695IKal4JVtPwM6ONxxEf128L0JgfJpNVY=; h=From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Date: Message-Id:To:Mime-Version; b=AxcbalspvFtLntvEV8h/IhAOjSOA5crzJwLiT3Vs3PKV/2jn74lMiyQqJH+WQJIqS Ge5hkMwFMGNSCIpatwk0HCPLgvVUgqLL7tJZu8FpM+woFQLy3mB3o1f3boYHWGz4c4 Zg9S27RL919VUu3hgKJkluLLpz28BU7dMcpHV1os= From: Eric Baldeschwieler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:50:40 -0700 Message-Id: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Hi Folks, Along with starting a new release off the mainline (see previous mail), = the Yahoo! team plans to continue producing sustaining releases off the = Hadoop with security branch, such as 0.20.203 . I'm writing this email = to outline our plans, explain Yahoo's motivation for supporting this = work and request feedback and hopefully your endorsement. This = initiative stems from Yahoo's commitment to do its hadoop work in Apache = and discontinue the Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop = (http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W). We hope to produce a new 0.20.204 release in Apache in the next few = weeks. Owen O'Malley is planning to act as release master for this = release. This will be based on work in the hadoop-with-security branch, = just as 0.20.203 but will include bugfixes and enhancements beyond those = in 0.20.203. This is one in a series of releases we hope to do in the = next 6-9 months as hadoop 0.23 (or whatever the community chooses to = call it) goes through the various stages of stability testing and = burn-in. CONTENTS OF THE RELEASE: Some highlights: - RPM & .deb packaging to ease deployment (back ported from trunk) - I am excited to see hadoop released with .deb & RPM packaging from = Apache for the first time. - This will greatly ease deployment - Disk fail in place (merged with trunk, except for some MR changes = conflict with MR-279, these will be reimplemented in MR-279) - This change has been motivated by operational problems we observed = with our new 12 disk machines. - This work should greatly improve Hadoop availability by keeping nodes = working when one of their disks fails - Lots of of additional fixes (I've included the change log below) WHY THIS PROCESS: Producing a stable release of Hadoop is a long, hard and expensive = process. Historically Y! has produced all such releases. Other = releases of Hadoop have either not been stable (Hadoop 0.19 and Hadoop = 0.21) or have been based on a stable Apache release driven by Yahoo (CDH = and Facebook). Once we've paid the price of making a stable release, it = makes a lot of sense to accept safe improvements as well as bug fixes. = Doing so allows one to get customer impacting improvements into = production in days, rather than years, which is what would happen if one = waited for changes to come in the next stable release off the Hadoop = mainline. Given that it takes many months to stabilize trunk, there is = no way to get new easy fixes into users hands quickly via a new mainline = release. For the last few years Yahoo has done sustaining engineering in open = source via Github. These patches have been contributed to Apache Hadoop = mainline and backported to the sustaining branch on github (for yahoo = 0.20 for example). We've then cut Yahoo releases from Github. Cloudera = and Facebook have also taken these patches from Github and incorporated = these improvements into their releases, so the community has benefitted = from this process for years. What we are planning to do now is simply = move this process into Apache, so that Apache releases themselves are = timely and relevant, not always a year or two behind what users need. How do I propose making these decisions? Deciding what is a safe patch = is a judgement call. Apache process suggests that the release manager = makes these calls (http://bit.ly/mJcBjc). For releases Y! champions, = such as 0.20 (arun & owen), we are ready to do the sustaining = engineering, make these calls and stand our reputation behind the = quality of the result. Other release masters are championing other = Apache Hadoop releases currently (Nigel and Tom) and I think they should = be free to do the same. For hadoop 20.204, I propose pushing what is = currently in the hadoop-with-security branch. Part of the reason for = this thread is to socialize this process, so that community members can = champion stable patches for inclusion in 20.205. In the future I = propose that a branch's release master request suggestions for future = releases on this list, but is free to use their judgement on what is = accepted (pretty much what nigel is doing on 0.22 today). ---- Conclusion: The vote on 0.20.203 was acrimonious, but I believe that 0.20.203 was a = useful step forward for Apache Hadoop. 0.20.204 will again be the best = stable release of Apache Hadoop ever. I hope folks can support the = effort. With your contribution 0.20.205 can be even better, fixing = issues that plague your Hadoop clusters. This email is part of a wider = effort from the Yahoo team to co-plan our work with the community. Thanks, Eric14 --- eric14 a.k.a. Eric Baldeschwieler VP Hadoop Software Development @Yahoo! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =46rom CHANGES.txt: Release 0.20.204.0 - unreleased NEW FEATURES HADOOP-6255. Create RPM and Debian packages for common. Changes = deployment layout to be consistent across the binary tgz, rpm, and deb. Adds = setup scripts for easy one node cluster configuration and user creation. (Eric Yang via omalley) BUG FIXES MAPREDUCE-2495. exit() the TaskTracker when the distributed cache = cleanup thread dies. (Robert Joseph Evans via cdouglas) HDFS-1878. TestHDFSServerPorts unit test failure - race condition=20 in FSNamesystem.close() causes NullPointerException without serious consequence. (mattf) MAPREDUCE-2452. Moves the cancellation of delegation tokens to a = separate thread. (ddas) MAPREDUCE-2555. Avoid sprious logging from completedtasks. (Thomas = Graves via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2451. Log the details from health check script at the JobTracker. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2535. Fix NPE in JobClient caused by retirement. (Robert = Joseph Evans via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2456. Log the reduce taskID and associated TaskTrackers = with failed fetch notifications in the JobTracker log. (Jeffrey Naisbitt via cdouglas) HDFS-2044. TestQueueProcessingStatistics failing automatic test due = to=20 timing issues. (mattf) HADOOP-7248. Update eclipse target to generate .classpath from ivy = config. (Thomas Graves and Tom White via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2558. Add queue-level metrics 0.20-security branch - test = fix (jeffrey nasbit via mahadev) HADOOP-7364. TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to=20= something other than build/test. (Thomas Graves via mahadev) HADOOP-7277. Add generation of run configurations to eclipse target. (Jeffrey Naisbitt and Philip Zeyliger via cdouglas) HADOOP-7373. Fix {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} and hadoop-daemons.sh from trying to use the wrong bin directory. (omalley) HADOOP-7274. Fix typos in IOUtils. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) HADOOP-7369. Fix permissions in tarball for sbin/* and libexec/* = (omalley) MAPREDUCE-2479. Move distributed cache cleanup to a background task, backporting MAPREDUCE-1568. (Robert Joseph Evans via cdouglas) HADOOP-7356. Fix bin/hadoop scripts (eyang via omalley) HADOOP-7272. Remove unnecessary security related info logs. (suresh) MAPREDUCE-2514. Fix typo in TaskTracker ReinitTrackerAction log = message. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) HDFS-1906. Remove logging exception stack trace in client logs when = one of the datanode targets to read from is not reachable. (suresh) MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to aid diagnosis of related issues. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2447. Fix Child.java to set Task.jvmContext sooner to avoid corner cases in error handling. (Siddharth Seth via acmurthy)=20 MAPREDUCE-2429. Validate JVM in TaskUmbilicalProtocol. (Siddharth = Seth via acmurthy)=20 MAPREDUCE-2418. Show job errors in JobHistory page. (Siddharth Seth = via acmurthy)=20 HDFS-1592. At Startup, Valid volumes required in FSDataset doesn't handle consistently with volumes tolerated. (Bharath Mundlapudi) HDFS-1598. Directory listing on hftp:// does not show .*.crc files. (szetszwo) HDFS-1750. ListPathsServlet should not use = HdfsFileStatus.getLocalName() to get file name since it may return an empty string. (szetszwo) HDFS-1758. Make Web UI JSP pages thread safe. (Tanping via suresh) HDFS-1773. Do not show decommissioned datanodes, which are not in = both include and exclude lists, on web and JMX interfaces. (Tanping Wang via szetszwo) MAPREDUCE-2409. Distinguish distributed cache artifacts localized as files, archives. (Siddharth Seth via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-118. Fix Job.getJobID() to get the new ID as soon as it's=20= assigned. (Amareshwari Sriramadasu and Dick King via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2411. Force an exception when the queue has an invalid name = or its ACLs are misconfigured. (Dick King via cdouglas) HDFS-1258. Clearing namespace quota on "/" corrupts fs image. =20 (Aaron T. Myers via szetszwo) HDFS-1189. Quota counts missed between clear quota and set quota. (John George via szetszwo) HDFS-1692. In secure mode, Datanode process doesn't exit when disks=20= fail. (bharathm via boryas) MAPREDUCE-2420. JobTracker should be able to renew delegation token=20= over HTTP (boryas) MAPREDUCE-2443. Fix TaskAspect for TaskUmbilicalProtocol.ping(..). (Siddharth Seth via szetszwo) HDFS-1842. Handle editlog opcode conflict with 0.20.203 during = upgrade, by throwing an error to indicate the editlog needs to be empty. (suresh) HDFS-1377. Quota bug for partial blocks allows quotas to be violated. = (eli) HDFS-2057. Wait time to terminate the threads causes unit tests to take longer time. (Bharath Mundlapudi via suresh) IMPROVEMENTS HADOOP-7144. Expose JMX metrics via JSON servlet. (Robert Joseph = Evans via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2524. Port reduce failure reporting semantics from trunk, = to fail faulty maps more aggressively. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2529. Add support for regex-based shuffle metric counting exceptions. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) HADOOP-7398. Suppress warnings about use of HADOOP_HOME. (omalley) MAPREDUCE-2415. Distribute the user task logs on to multiple disks. (Bharath Mundlapudi via omalley) MAPREDUCE-2413. TaskTracker should handle disk failures by = reinitializing=20 itself. (Ravi Gummadi and Jagane Sundar via omalley) HDFS-1541. Not marking datanodes dead when namenode in safemode. (hairong) HDFS-1767. Namenode ignores non-initial block report from datanodes when in safemode during startup. (Matt Foley via suresh) MAPREDUCE-1251. c++ utils doesn't compile. (Eli Collins via shv) HADOOP-7330. Fix MetricsSourceAdapter to use the value instead of the=20= object. (Luke Lu via omalley) From general-return-3865-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 08:18:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28DB164A5 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21084 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 08:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21031 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 08:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21023 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 08:18:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:18:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of szhaoyu@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:18:49 +0000 Received: by ywn13 with SMTP id 13so1541533ywn.35 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pZFOTQUK9mYpMIYqLS6k131QbVpydjQDrWWUKuxwiK0=; b=FB+D3Rz975lN6JriKKTvtgMfr+hitolRgnZI2xiZiep5UAzpjKF1diysE0Df3ZGZ+N 6EAP0h0YZFwBawyjP5M+9wUJLyt2onk8Y5Q0Wdy4lvI9JdrgW3A2ZIk429aePp6WBKcS BTn9Wup6ww9j7bU34hJgIlsDY1HMqgk0t4A2o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VwgvZYC5PtzQ+kWpWZaLrnGU+p19LYy5pH95BR88J882lLt4ZYFHaLDq2D9MG59X0X Kg79AHEvyHaSlanY2SAN6h9QyYWuhDnikcn+w+IxHY1R1LiFdM4jughAKmqq+F41oi9H rV0urRc54PRizgFRQO81INuKOeT4RwCR++iNo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.32.17 with SMTP id f17mr3290244ybf.267.1308385108323; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.108.5 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:18:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: =?UTF-8?B?5a2Z5YWG546J?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2a0249c6d7704a5f8259a --000e0cd2a0249c6d7704a5f8259a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2 5 6 --000e0cd2a0249c6d7704a5f8259a-- From general-return-3866-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 20:22:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59EB66C6E for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32534 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 20:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32491 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 20:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32483 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 20:22:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.66] (HELO homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:22:36 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152501B405F for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:22:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=oLdsd6DY1cYOHGlSBXMdpEgoDA0sXjLc4DskLKYsLSi4IHKAoeb4 zbgFtDB0Wh+KHPH/Gs9p9imgjExOWo/sQcuAarSFjrAsp1RB+5hFZIr6sCKSjvr4 2ksVw9EJS4vXUrQevo9kncTC559CVrWPDAVOP+0khllo/nf5L0j54sg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=0GhER5n6CRIBo2P416OrXnhJwsE=; b=1FPdRIphEfb+gS5gQyaIkrcllNwZ lkicoYoYayT4VYY3RPl4o5Ehh27pslnJvFm4rccMhuUikow95e+d7G7WI60UddgS +0E/pZwYPw5MLCX/7KceYIrC22x2sXwYSMeMfjGtFk/LdZYeM2u9XDicasxPBaYd d7jz22hmIlZbUro= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCA521B4058 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:22:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Along with starting a new release off the mainline (see previous = mail), the Yahoo! team plans to continue producing sustaining releases = off the Hadoop with security branch, such as 0.20.203 . I'm writing = this email to outline our plans, explain Yahoo's motivation for = supporting this work and request feedback and hopefully your = endorsement. This initiative stems from Yahoo's commitment to do its = hadoop work in Apache and discontinue the Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop = (http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W). Eric, Please make an effort to understand that we act at Apache as = individuals. That includes you and your team. Yes, everyone greatly appreciates the fact that Yahoo! pays your salaries. Nevertheless, here you are called an individual named Eric. Companies do not have motivations. You do. There is nothing wrong with each and every individual here being motivated, at least partly, by what their boss(es) consider the right path forward. But you don't have to sell it as something Yahoo! is doing, and you don't need to send = marketing messaging to the development lists at Apache. Just be yourself and represent yourself. Anyone on the PMC can be an RM. A package can be rolled at any time, = and a release vote on that package can be called at any time. While it = makes sense for the individual planning to RM a release to announce their = plans, doing so does not in any way form the direction the product is headed, nor does it exclude anyone else from being RM of their own release = process. There is absolutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries. ....Roy= From general-return-3867-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 22:50:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62C1E6C3C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92677 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:50:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92608 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92600 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 22:50:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:50:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jrottinghuis@ebay.com) Received: from [216.33.244.6] (HELO rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com) (216.33.244.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:50:00 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Date: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=yWEUEClNgHc7+5OFhJfQiEdNoVg8j+Vzcckw4rEAeHzCDroqtbnHTgvx ik+qoboWcuqK2pNFLiBrGXTzBhUtNifNRPedE0g60tZwNj5bMZXrz1cSC F/9xjkd7uWzhvPr; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=jrottinghuis@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1308437400; x=1339973400; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bUX8seb9VTEX9w7t4SMppONAq3fPJV52AwFYqRSHiEg=; b=l5SftAUJTvoLqHECMpyViKfZwBovZF0QEcFyd7A55Wob7mPcdTPfMpuY bbcTND7LxPObjN/DJHwCOFO7SV8J6ZPtLGfnu8NA0gu/MFQBdLcsTodoo 9qb6OsmjeQUN1/y; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,387,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="21455353" Received: from rhv-vtenf-002.corp.ebay.com (HELO RHV-MEXHT-003.corp.ebay.com) ([10.112.113.53]) by rhv-mipot-001.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2011 15:49:38 -0700 Received: from RHV-MEXMS-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.17.115]) by RHV-MEXHT-003.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.24.102]) with mapi; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:49:36 -0700 From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:47:16 -0700 Subject: RE: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Index: AcwthDfXw9WrxdpeR4Oj0J1JWIclygAhXPiQ Message-ID: References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== x-ems-stamp: 9tpq8CilICIOIdZtjvkQqA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter: Scanned Thanks for clarifying your position and being open with your plans going fo= rward. Joep ________________________________________ From: Eric Baldeschwieler [eric14@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:50 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Hi Folks, Along with starting a new release off the mainline (see previous mail), the= Yahoo! team plans to continue producing sustaining releases off the Hadoop= with security branch, such as 0.20.203 . I'm writing this email to outlin= e our plans, explain Yahoo's motivation for supporting this work and reques= t feedback and hopefully your endorsement. This initiative stems from Yaho= o's commitment to do its hadoop work in Apache and discontinue the Yahoo Di= stribution of Hadoop (http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W). We hope to produce a new 0.20.204 release in Apache in the next few weeks. = Owen O'Malley is planning to act as release master for this release. This= will be based on work in the hadoop-with-security branch, just as 0.20.203= but will include bugfixes and enhancements beyond those in 0.20.203. This= is one in a series of releases we hope to do in the next 6-9 months as had= oop 0.23 (or whatever the community chooses to call it) goes through the va= rious stages of stability testing and burn-in. CONTENTS OF THE RELEASE: Some highlights: - RPM & .deb packaging to ease deployment (back ported from trunk) - I am excited to see hadoop released with .deb & RPM packaging from Apach= e for the first time. - This will greatly ease deployment - Disk fail in place (merged with trunk, except for some MR changes conflic= t with MR-279, these will be reimplemented in MR-279) - This change has been motivated by operational problems we observed with = our new 12 disk machines. - This work should greatly improve Hadoop availability by keeping nodes wo= rking when one of their disks fails - Lots of of additional fixes (I've included the change log below) WHY THIS PROCESS: Producing a stable release of Hadoop is a long, hard and expensive process.= Historically Y! has produced all such releases. Other releases of Hadoop= have either not been stable (Hadoop 0.19 and Hadoop 0.21) or have been bas= ed on a stable Apache release driven by Yahoo (CDH and Facebook). Once we'= ve paid the price of making a stable release, it makes a lot of sense to ac= cept safe improvements as well as bug fixes. Doing so allows one to get cu= stomer impacting improvements into production in days, rather than years, w= hich is what would happen if one waited for changes to come in the next sta= ble release off the Hadoop mainline. Given that it takes many months to st= abilize trunk, there is no way to get new easy fixes into users hands quick= ly via a new mainline release. For the last few years Yahoo has done sustaining engineering in open source= via Github. These patches have been contributed to Apache Hadoop mainline= and backported to the sustaining branch on github (for yahoo 0.20 for exam= ple). We've then cut Yahoo releases from Github. Cloudera and Facebook ha= ve also taken these patches from Github and incorporated these improvements= into their releases, so the community has benefitted from this process for= years. What we are planning to do now is simply move this process into Ap= ache, so that Apache releases themselves are timely and relevant, not alway= s a year or two behind what users need. How do I propose making these decisions? Deciding what is a safe patch is = a judgement call. Apache process suggests that the release manager makes t= hese calls (http://bit.ly/mJcBjc). For releases Y! champions, such as 0.20= (arun & owen), we are ready to do the sustaining engineering, make these c= alls and stand our reputation behind the quality of the result. Other rele= ase masters are championing other Apache Hadoop releases currently (Nigel a= nd Tom) and I think they should be free to do the same. For hadoop 20.204,= I propose pushing what is currently in the hadoop-with-security branch. P= art of the reason for this thread is to socialize this process, so that com= munity members can champion stable patches for inclusion in 20.205. In the= future I propose that a branch's release master request suggestions for fu= ture releases on this list, but is free to use their judgement on what is a= ccepted (pretty much what nigel is doing on 0.22 today). ---- Conclusion: The vote on 0.20.203 was acrimonious, but I believe that 0.20.203 was a use= ful step forward for Apache Hadoop. 0.20.204 will again be the best stable= release of Apache Hadoop ever. I hope folks can support the effort. With= your contribution 0.20.205 can be even better, fixing issues that plague y= our Hadoop clusters. This email is part of a wider effort from the Yahoo t= eam to co-plan our work with the community. Thanks, Eric14 --- eric14 a.k.a. Eric Baldeschwieler VP Hadoop Software Development @Yahoo! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >From CHANGES.txt: Release 0.20.204.0 - unreleased NEW FEATURES HADOOP-6255. Create RPM and Debian packages for common. Changes deployme= nt layout to be consistent across the binary tgz, rpm, and deb. Adds setup scripts for easy one node cluster configuration and user creation. (Eric Yang via omalley) BUG FIXES MAPREDUCE-2495. exit() the TaskTracker when the distributed cache cleanu= p thread dies. (Robert Joseph Evans via cdouglas) HDFS-1878. TestHDFSServerPorts unit test failure - race condition in FSNamesystem.close() causes NullPointerException without serious consequence. (mattf) MAPREDUCE-2452. Moves the cancellation of delegation tokens to a separat= e thread. (ddas) MAPREDUCE-2555. Avoid sprious logging from completedtasks. (Thomas Grave= s via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2451. Log the details from health check script at the JobTracker. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2535. Fix NPE in JobClient caused by retirement. (Robert Josep= h Evans via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2456. Log the reduce taskID and associated TaskTrackers with failed fetch notifications in the JobTracker log. (Jeffrey Naisbitt via cdouglas) HDFS-2044. TestQueueProcessingStatistics failing automatic test due to timing issues. (mattf) HADOOP-7248. Update eclipse target to generate .classpath from ivy confi= g. (Thomas Graves and Tom White via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2558. Add queue-level metrics 0.20-security branch - test fix (jeffrey nasbit via mahadev) HADOOP-7364. TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. (Thomas Graves via mahadev) HADOOP-7277. Add generation of run configurations to eclipse target. (Jeffrey Naisbitt and Philip Zeyliger via cdouglas) HADOOP-7373. Fix {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} and hadoop-daemons.sh from trying to use the wrong bin directory. (omalley) HADOOP-7274. Fix typos in IOUtils. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) HADOOP-7369. Fix permissions in tarball for sbin/* and libexec/* (omalle= y) MAPREDUCE-2479. Move distributed cache cleanup to a background task, backporting MAPREDUCE-1568. (Robert Joseph Evans via cdouglas) HADOOP-7356. Fix bin/hadoop scripts (eyang via omalley) HADOOP-7272. Remove unnecessary security related info logs. (suresh) MAPREDUCE-2514. Fix typo in TaskTracker ReinitTrackerAction log message. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) HDFS-1906. Remove logging exception stack trace in client logs when one = of the datanode targets to read from is not reachable. (suresh) MAPREDUCE-2490. Add logging to graylist and blacklist activity to aid diagnosis of related issues. (Jonathan Eagles via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2447. Fix Child.java to set Task.jvmContext sooner to avoid corner cases in error handling. (Siddharth Seth via acmurthy) MAPREDUCE-2429. Validate JVM in TaskUmbilicalProtocol. (Siddharth Seth v= ia acmurthy) MAPREDUCE-2418. Show job errors in JobHistory page. (Siddharth Seth via acmurthy) HDFS-1592. At Startup, Valid volumes required in FSDataset doesn't handle consistently with volumes tolerated. (Bharath Mundlapudi) HDFS-1598. Directory listing on hftp:// does not show .*.crc files. (szetszwo) HDFS-1750. ListPathsServlet should not use HdfsFileStatus.getLocalName() to get file name since it may return an empty string. (szetszwo) HDFS-1758. Make Web UI JSP pages thread safe. (Tanping via suresh) HDFS-1773. Do not show decommissioned datanodes, which are not in both include and exclude lists, on web and JMX interfaces. (Tanping Wang via szetszwo) MAPREDUCE-2409. Distinguish distributed cache artifacts localized as files, archives. (Siddharth Seth via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-118. Fix Job.getJobID() to get the new ID as soon as it's assigned. (Amareshwari Sriramadasu and Dick King via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2411. Force an exception when the queue has an invalid name or its ACLs are misconfigured. (Dick King via cdouglas) HDFS-1258. Clearing namespace quota on "/" corrupts fs image. (Aaron T. Myers via szetszwo) HDFS-1189. Quota counts missed between clear quota and set quota. (John George via szetszwo) HDFS-1692. In secure mode, Datanode process doesn't exit when disks fail. (bharathm via boryas) MAPREDUCE-2420. JobTracker should be able to renew delegation token over HTTP (boryas) MAPREDUCE-2443. Fix TaskAspect for TaskUmbilicalProtocol.ping(..). (Siddharth Seth via szetszwo) HDFS-1842. Handle editlog opcode conflict with 0.20.203 during upgrade, by throwing an error to indicate the editlog needs to be empty. (suresh) HDFS-1377. Quota bug for partial blocks allows quotas to be violated. (e= li) HDFS-2057. Wait time to terminate the threads causes unit tests to take longer time. (Bharath Mundlapudi via suresh) IMPROVEMENTS HADOOP-7144. Expose JMX metrics via JSON servlet. (Robert Joseph Evans v= ia cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2524. Port reduce failure reporting semantics from trunk, to fail faulty maps more aggressively. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) MAPREDUCE-2529. Add support for regex-based shuffle metric counting exceptions. (Thomas Graves via cdouglas) HADOOP-7398. Suppress warnings about use of HADOOP_HOME. (omalley) MAPREDUCE-2415. Distribute the user task logs on to multiple disks. (Bharath Mundlapudi via omalley) MAPREDUCE-2413. TaskTracker should handle disk failures by reinitializin= g itself. (Ravi Gummadi and Jagane Sundar via omalley) HDFS-1541. Not marking datanodes dead when namenode in safemode. (hairong) HDFS-1767. Namenode ignores non-initial block report from datanodes when in safemode during startup. (Matt Foley via suresh) MAPREDUCE-1251. c++ utils doesn't compile. (Eli Collins via shv) HADOOP-7330. Fix MetricsSourceAdapter to use the value instead of the object. (Luke Lu via omalley)= From general-return-3868-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 22:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8831D6DBD for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96795 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96740 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96732 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 22:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.20 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:56:22 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5IMtp9D014518; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:55:51 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:55:47 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Index: AcwuCt5+1RQYs1wNR/mtFYMej1Y8iQ== Message-ID: <3F4E1CA0-6A80-4AF1-AAC7-0A43996E4EA5@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Roy, Thanks for the clarification. I will endeavor to keep marketing to a minimu= m. I always try to keep my actions as a manager and project contributor con= sistent with our community norms. When one is speaking as the manager of a= team of contributors pronouns get complicated.=20 I've gotten lots of feedback that folks would like a better understanding o= f what I plan to ask team members to invest in. And lots of questions about= why we don't do various things others would like to see done. My goal is = simply to be transparent. That should allow all of us to make better decisi= ons as a community.=20 Given the number of questions I have gotten on why "yahoo" chooses to do su= staining I think the background is needed for an informed debate.=20 I expect yahoo team members will continue to make branches and call release= votes. I hope that sharing my thinking, intentions and motivations up fron= t reduces conflict.=20 --- E14 - typing on glass On Jun 18, 2011, at 1:23 PM, "Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >=20 >> Along with starting a new release off the mainline (see previous mail), = the Yahoo! team plans to continue producing sustaining releases off the Had= oop with security branch, such as 0.20.203 . I'm writing this email to out= line our plans, explain Yahoo's motivation for supporting this work and req= uest feedback and hopefully your endorsement. This initiative stems from Y= ahoo's commitment to do its hadoop work in Apache and discontinue the Yahoo= Distribution of Hadoop (http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W). >=20 > Eric, >=20 > Please make an effort to understand that we act at Apache as individuals. > That includes you and your team. Yes, everyone greatly appreciates the > fact that Yahoo! pays your salaries. Nevertheless, here you are called > an individual named Eric. >=20 > Companies do not have motivations. You do. There is nothing wrong with > each and every individual here being motivated, at least partly, by what > their boss(es) consider the right path forward. But you don't have to > sell it as something Yahoo! is doing, and you don't need to send marketin= g > messaging to the development lists at Apache. Just be yourself and > represent yourself. >=20 > Anyone on the PMC can be an RM. A package can be rolled at any time, and > a release vote on that package can be called at any time. While it makes > sense for the individual planning to RM a release to announce their plans= , > doing so does not in any way form the direction the product is headed, > nor does it exclude anyone else from being RM of their own release proces= s. >=20 > There is absolutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release > tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release > vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries. >=20 > ....Roy From general-return-3869-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 00:56:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6821B6082 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33644 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 00:56:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33577 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 00:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88257 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 14:45:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <4DFCB9F1.2010603@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:45:05 -0400 From: Shane Curcuru User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trademarks@apache.org CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:8idlbUD7/+41kjzJS14KUVDJH0PkIwIYioCNcgbJtM6 CyzuWn4BwI3J4FaFMEfu7eEidImJB3sfWIz3fHQaseQFdQ47tj Df0hEFE5aEOLwpGqTZYmN1T0jnj/uu8KYR53rfh7fKc6DXq4tu krW2E08aY1y9uVBYATHm9mLKi4MtcDXIIBiXjxub+Zv/v13wWz eYd1VSt0VFNklUhy2PiOGHiQl1d6zupz/FTyRW2Sc4= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One clarification: I've only had time to review the wiki document for some terminology updates, and not for the overall content yet. So from the trademarks@ point of view, more review is needed before we work on making this official. From the significant amount of discussion in this vote thread, I think it might be good to have the Hadoop PMC and trademarks@ work on getting a more organized consensus first, before voting on an updated proposed Hadoop policy. - Shane Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be > called Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop > . After some cleanup from > Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like a vote > to approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put the content > on our web site. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3870-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 00:56:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9998E60A7 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34063 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 00:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33943 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 00:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82667 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 14:30:49 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <4DFCB676.2060308@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:30:14 -0400 From: Shane Curcuru User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: trademarks@apache.org, "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Trademarks and Derivative Works References: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C208101086D60@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> In-Reply-To: <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C208101086D60@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:YMDhRvt2MPvgKCYfaqceK3QWqsUFr6HftKzfRMr6q7I 8hK9Uz/3eoW9L+KDYsZZOESGi3BXZ84gIRpLWgK69ls31VmAci S33oLYvQlfgKzX/v0O7s7tc4DB7PA8Kws4KVcARPuEhWIe1D8r Tz5N3SQ8b4zmcWokrMYNA/EwM+X9ribPKFjQ1AdctZol5cfRUx OZFDJIY4KsO6qYtu9NaxaH7vOiOj96KrPQ8q3lWt74= (Apologies; I'm on the way to a family memorial service, so I don't have time for a complete answer here, although this is an important issue for trademarks@) I certainly appreciate the work that the Hadoop PMC has been doing in terms of better defining the kinds of use cases for Hadoop derivatives or related kinds of software! The pre-existing "Powered By" metaphor from httpd is a great model, and one that allows for strong independent branding by third parties while still allowing for use of Apache marks within third party names, with a clear separation. However the phrase "Powered by" does not fit many uses of software like Hadoop, so we need both some alternate naming styles, as well as some better definitions of models of third party uses; derivatives with additional code, integrations with other products, uses of Apache software as services, etc. I've always wanted to create a generic list of other phrases to use instead of "Powered By" that we would list as a policy of pre-approved uses for these kind of cases. I'd like to see more discussion from the PMC, because Hadoop in particular is a key technology that's being used in a wide variety of ways - really defining a new computing model. However I think we really need to take this input and then have trademarks@ work on an Apache-wide policy for approved third party product and services naming styles for all Apache products. Obviously, some of the specific types of uses of Hadoop may not be applicable to other Apache products, but in general I think working on a larger set of guidelines that apply would be the best way to approach this situation for all Apache projects. Overall, trademarks@ and VP, Brand Management set branding policy for all Apache projects. But we definitely need the combined input of both folks on Hadoop - with so many new and innovative uses of our software - plus the input of some of our longer-running projects like httpd and Tomcat, with experience in *nix-style packaging and the like, to come up with the best policy for these kind of third party uses of our product marks. - Shane Curcuru VP, Brand Management, The Apache Software Foundation Segel, Mike wrote: > Owen, From your response below you say the following: "We are trying > to assert that only the Apache releases can be called Hadoop. That > seems to be the best way to help the project ensure compatibility and > prevent user confusion." and " I want Hadoop to be used in as many > products as possible. Having a FooCo product that is called "FooCo > HugeInsights powered by Hadoop" is absolutely great. The question is > just whether they can call something Hadoop if it isn't an Apache > release. > > -- Owen" > > Owen, Unfortunately what you're saying is that you would only approve > of companies that build their products on top of Apache's release and > doesn't modify the Apache release. To give you an example... if Acme > Risk Management Company sold a product using Hadoop to do risk > analysis on a bank's portfolio, they can only say "powered by Hadoop" > if they build their application on top of Apache's release. But the > minute they build their solution on top of anyone else, they would > lose that right? So using Cloudera's release, which contains things > outside of the official Apache release would disallow them? Or if > they make their own modifications to the underlying release which > isn't part of the official release, they could no longer make that > claim? > > This interpretation of "powered by Hadoop" would unfortunately lead > to as many problems as it attempts to solve. First, many choose > Cloudera's release because they sell commercial support. So in > choosing Cloudera's release, they would lose the ability to say > "powered by Hadoop". This diminishes the branding message. > > The Apache License allows for broad reuse and relicensing as long as > the company complies with Apache's T's & C's. Limiting the ability > to say "powered by Hadoop" means that they will say that their > solution uses a commercially supported 'derivative of Hadoop'. In > terms of legalese, good luck in trying to get them on a misuse of > your trademark. Cloudera, EMC, MapRTech, Datastax all offer > derivatives of Hadoop. (I'm not forgetting about Yahoo!, but are they > releasing their own version as well?) The term Hadoop is used as a > reference to Apache's Hadoop release. > > I hope that you start to see the dangers on taking a narrow approach > in how you define Hadoop. > > Just IMHO. > > -Mike > > -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley > [mailto:omalley@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:32 PM To: > general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: trademarks@apache.org Subject: Re: > Trademarks and Derivative Works > > > On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > >> Under default trademark law, those others can distribute HADOOP and >> APACHE HADOOP only if it is a redistribution of *our* HADOOP or >> APACHE HADOOP software. (That's why you can buy Jello Brand gelatin >> at Safeway.) Those trademarks are our names for our software. ASF >> is the source and origin of those software goods. Nobody else can >> apply those trademarks to their own software. > > The problem is that a rapidly growing set of companies are > distributing products that have never been released by Apache and > calling them Hadoop. The rules from HTTPD, as I understand them, are > that they allow artifacts to be called HTTPD that are releases plus > patches that have been committed. With HTTPD that has a formal > specification and a very large compatibility test suite, that works. > For Hadoop without a formal specification or test suite, we simply > can't handle companies calling things Hadoop that are thousands of > patches away from our releases. We are trying to assert that only the > Apache releases can be called Hadoop. That seems to be the best way > to help the project ensure compatibility and prevent user confusion. > >> It will be to our advantage to have HADOOP and APACHE HADOOP >> software better known and widely used throughout the world. For >> that purpose, we should be defining the rules we want to >> *encourage* third parties to follow, not arguing about derivative >> work analysis or voting on whether or not something is a trademark. >> > > I want Hadoop to be used in as many products as possible. Having a > FooCo product that is called "FooCo HugeInsights powered by Hadoop" > is absolutely great. The question is just whether they can call > something Hadoop if it isn't an Apache release. > > -- Owen > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL > and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If > you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any > of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy > the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper > files. From general-return-3871-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 05:56:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 225EC6975 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49958 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:56:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49620 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49603 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 05:56:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.80] (HELO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:56:01 +0000 Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id y5e31g0011bwxycA85vfTj; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:55:39 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id y5wA1g0043QAh8g8e5wAg2; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:56:10 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5K5tdKL018230 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:55:39 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5K5td7a018229 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:55:39 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:55:39 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo Message-ID: <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer? The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h Cos On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing > is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will > automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > From general-return-3872-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:22:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 403FA6C14 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76220 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:22:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75915 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67112 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:14:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scgkiran@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MCyEdkAVfOxWZIzm6Z0ZmlS3355GLgh02W4VZrPXeTc=; b=aZ27sdCM+rVDXKhNDn/BDypUPnjAAu2bKAKjePthpXivW5brFyhHfz6vkkwsyz3tiL ytkTj2ZhakKv3ODUk9DWPdvAmLrKZYrGZtLgCbfQTC/F6nStmcPe968H7Z3b0IKasytY 8liysXO4jKHQdRgx1X1ifcFaJtNbeIoOrLQMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DMZ/W7pDz4PwDC2HNrq0W7tXc99/nf0CABxn+QNXLxySKM7zytoviZlCMRaUED3kU6 Z+uIKM7bZzwUJ+V+Y/kD2Q0GfreV6pJPtOf3XYijNb2QXVP/q9kIx+MoM1Tc4CAlr49H d2LYREK+rNeXFqV9d0TR/GGzJ3DUF4PwlwitA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:44:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Powered by Hadoop logo: From: Chandra Guru Kiran Babu Sanapala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520f22b8d39d904a61ea44e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec520f22b8d39d904a61ea44e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --bcaec520f22b8d39d904a61ea44e-- From general-return-3873-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:22:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA8416C3A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77735 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76437 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:22:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69733 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:17:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ramesh.416@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=b59+w15I639tVLUerQPWmglpcuWltVmxCPNHAPN8DuA=; b=A+QzOJeZxeU04GBL81IZMLF1G/IjFyrk4/5Eu6scz1AF//IVTALXHujtSwhrXGGLMC gU9+h3Gqe32Rvy8+pm1Mf5OGlxCWnEKjsCXPdat7CIIiSeUDekVURYJOr958xKprUjZE ZbHyihhh7AtkEkq0IHSvJxT+fCGbDoiCKJg8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lJQ4+cvT3sYvomFbOSwvF/Ws+b3WBg9PvWEnS6fLLz5QQvjCxvrIqI1CHYBX1lx7o0 SI1F0yMbN4fdVBxTX3nwFJKFCYZ8yDce7rEcdIxY8yekMq5PCD6fXo+acWtF9qRnS/Jm G2aUXInQL0EUM8jdsp0Cdq4yjAJpvZOTM3MCQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:47:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo From: Ramesh Muppidi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ef0d6d3eef6204a61eafa7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ef0d6d3eef6204a61eafa7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4,5,6,1,3,2 --001636ef0d6d3eef6204a61eafa7-- From general-return-3874-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:23:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46C626C6F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79289 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:23:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78637 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68639 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:16:29 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marella@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=c+Uu8Nzhvvt0lHTlRxGeF0pBu2RaWzvXJRr6wGDWtic=; b=TGgxydwRdwWEjXOJ9EV6iVkSHv+dp7wcItRkrcXxGJM8XmOCppRSklicuxrF2I6Luf m6d0YIDjQ3H5YiRxO+xyGNqO2p7+LJVneEMn6Xbj0uGdBx9AkWWVLpk6qsJpZTNZmEgb Jmd4lQnLuTHaHmDSmjvO2zFo1HXHP7bw41X5Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=E8JBhp9S0pk4wcxjk/flQpjekhDejsanACMjW6rNG5PqHQyYrltEsmXtyzRPO8q8TS koqyrOQYiZem8//u1Ui46jjR83O+c0UOkiYzBFiE/AxP1crZMs284nv8pQmpOxnTL2rA RlBX17cgBMByVNq6e32V4Ut0xzohqKo1gZwII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:46:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo: From: Santosh Marella To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64f466e7154f204a61eabed --0016e64f466e7154f204a61eabed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --0016e64f466e7154f204a61eabed-- From general-return-3875-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:26:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 185136D35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84988 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84720 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71741 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:20:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ravindrap@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CqOTEQnXkKR7qMLv384YLt8gRpEqxnlg3dbjp+SXYv4=; b=taTqOzVHuzZwgR1WUm9R6ilm4yDigLZp+hmpz4NVW+M5eAIv6xIDrermVMpEAKr2tl 0bwm+Ao/ZgxzHi5I8g7PRzzpSGb34xpTtm8T7adBnvUjYBPgLqIocCc8o0Mwi1mrn0p+ RYrTiKYuiXF0jprWVljCoAfitC+/xyizDs30o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=V6YzE94U7qA2c90rHwFKuE4s7NhaIuq0UWz8sSMd/7zJixZlMhnJ7oOwRzu9NsPBGZ LvugHAhDmgVZZ/pJ3T8sR6l+o82XYM8czy4jWvD6TVwFmo+VlOWWoCJCjs88Gsjvehkh nGIzM1ssahQFt40Zyc8WfeDTicFTolqhgfxYs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:49:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo From: Pindikura Ravindra To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555b34e31ba5304a61eb99e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555b34e31ba5304a61eb99e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --00032555b34e31ba5304a61eb99e-- From general-return-3876-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:29:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1022F6DD1 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92038 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90930 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:29:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80877 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:23:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of arvind.pande@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2tlht4HgDFkK3R/Zw72pHFslrpaiHA5HnNaILujZ0pI=; b=MBASDBv1s9+HgpHtgJTMmXufmy21cVhBqybBVSHG8Hpoc3gBwO+ASbxegj7gWp5zN1 cgR+cynfR6KFimMPbq0U0ZERJtfWiTHk6DJBhLXtiTHQh5craUJGDxx2R8rJOHwnH4z4 CVmMjmEKj1DX2UU1QwwwQTGlc3mdYuLL7TZYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZgnGxQzfb+H0FyC3aNhI/AwbwG85R8mLHvA38W1Cf58QaiZVmnATad8yWs72BY5Xmt ewAPbxMvTWnTIsGioDiWlbWkljr19jHp1jmff68pYVAmVAMQY15Ntk8JFLPIParqwha/ pAW3s6yNQpZyHbPvohj0ARvk8QK/7M2v3F7fo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:53:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo From: Arvind Pande To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5016643f9e7c604a61ec51f --bcaec5016643f9e7c604a61ec51f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --bcaec5016643f9e7c604a61ec51f-- From general-return-3877-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:46:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6136E6E5A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6887 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:46:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6709 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6701 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:45:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:45:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of teamphy6@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:45:48 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3163020bwz.35 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zXXqB/8KLYtSiVZzAVYaXEKVkpo5XsD2oAh+4gGi3ps=; b=FyyXAUt/2A70m2IuNB/nndeabpHG1t9xycYq8/1149fKm1ZztcBIwSWVsmsaNHI14r jl/2NAXUEZMDNSHhRzwCSfHbHei1UD3gvDmraswug7Red6+nQmSvnG2ozaMZkIdvPuEc wdVMl2nVRxHynp2JN1iRNRzj0aRUwRSb1WaSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SAsUzjLwCPQ6ZNA0jwBHFPZb0ZTB0mwB6OgTDPNFllgLoev73+YODXKV+JZvgf3nUd gi/Cren03NChpBA0h1yclskVp4X9hRlDObJYfAxvQC6Z2qSEMU5JdjK93r0QGPIy5V/0 2YqJB8+p+Hu0PmiOhd4jl9ECa01yxGnMYzUjU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.25.66 with SMTP id y2mr1348420bkb.153.1308552327851; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.20.3 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:45:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:45:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Daniel Jue To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Lots of the same bitstring: 4,2,6,1,3,5 out of 6 choose 6, 720 permutations. Just Sayin. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer= ? > > The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h > > Cos > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> All, >> =A0 =A0We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put= them >> =A0 =A0all on a page, here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important th= ing >> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you d= on't >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will >> automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > From general-return-3878-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 07:15:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECD2D69A8 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37148 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 07:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36467 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 07:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36459 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 07:15:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:15:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of arvind.pande@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:15:26 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1357645vws.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zLuEt2HUh8K53087e14NCYcxIlz1AQ6WkOVmXK318MQ=; b=cWMWXRPqzn7bI8csTYRzYCX9YczQkKyccr8TvP80OP8RhniSLhcsko7akmpmYoXfWK mH6+F//eejZ6CAQdsN1z4HTITNouP9veS0c+1vrpmB0N30RLtOHj7jMSrrXMsZ5+giwI WlE4dT/YCpFM9mYQ4LM95jkukkr83fya/iNWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=tUhMvRc315uHPDLB4S1K/dWQ4x4656Xqb+v2R/MTY4LK620A3zGM91Z4y2NFVlJUEI t9Zg3nOi+yq7ZqbqyzR7zRTWspADqgNrFaMP/A0vanLUiJxkoNLHduXfrKqgZrJi94oQ i8jK075qCSsLN/lN3d4BNkNrbiWyTcHjSndeo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.48.71 with SMTP id q7mr1900507vcf.8.1308554106102; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.201.13 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:45:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo: From: Arvind Pande To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64616c4a9e2c704a61f7e83 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64616c4a9e2c704a61f7e83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5 --0016e64616c4a9e2c704a61f7e83-- From general-return-3879-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 07:52:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF6E6EDE for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78649 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 07:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78357 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 07:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78337 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 07:52:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:52:08 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3205936bwz.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.7.6 with SMTP id b6mr3838543bkb.177.1308556306176; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.118.210 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:51:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:51:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325555866cc5a4e04a62001a4 --000325555866cc5a4e04a62001a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer? http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making >From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera --000325555866cc5a4e04a62001a4-- From general-return-3880-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 08:07:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58B686738 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 130 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99899 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99879 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 08:07:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:58:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3209803bwz.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:57:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.24.9 with SMTP id rc9mr1953996bkb.92.1308556665856; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.40.195 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:57:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <20110620055539.GA18201@linspire.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:57:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303640133ca2a604a620175e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303640133ca2a604a620175e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5, 2. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or > longer? > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making > > From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop > bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open. > > -- > Aaron T. Myers > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --20cf303640133ca2a604a620175e-- From general-return-3881-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 08:14:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3406ACE for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11435 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:14:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11241 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11232 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 08:14:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:14:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nowplay@qq.com designates 64.71.138.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.71.138.44] (HELO smtpbg55.qq.com) (64.71.138.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:14:48 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s0907; t=1308557657; bh=zC99YMUmKb5xShX7wvmr+2Ncqb3ruSgsBu2OONAKGrA=; h=X-QQ-SSF:X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN:X-Originating-IP:X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid:From:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:X-Priority:Message-ID:X-QQ-MIME: X-Mailer:X-QQ-Mailer:X-QQ-ReplyHash; b=GBfzZGtm/zohXuZCNWVUxR9zr1JZ7DkoIGCEmnAaRD8iOzT0yLWFTISfon0ztfonF YVLlGIJyjcQ+CQgp2EaN7jl7yVV9u6CQnAdIO4PVobEDcaulc3hGgD/mM10UaRS X-QQ-SSF:0000000000000050 X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN:2 X-Originating-IP: 64.233.99.51 X-QQ-STYLE: X-QQ-mid:webmail368t1308557654t445523 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?bm93cGxheQ==?=" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?Z2VuZXJhbA==?=" Subject: Re:[VOTE] Powered by Logo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_4DFF0155_DEBF6CF8_1CD762BE" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:14:13 +0800 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-ReplyHash: 2327217350 ------=_NextPart_4DFF0155_DEBF6CF8_1CD762BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MSw2LDUsMiw0LDM= ------=_NextPart_4DFF0155_DEBF6CF8_1CD762BE-- From general-return-3882-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 08:29:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFFBB62C2 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34498 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:29:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34426 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:29:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34418 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 08:29:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:29:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:29:13 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3231514bwz.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:28:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.75.23 with SMTP id w23mr3943483bkj.200.1308558531716; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.40.195 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:28:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DFCB9F1.2010603@shanecurcuru.org> References: <4DFCB9F1.2010603@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:28:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77df67364e604a6208609 --0016e6d77df67364e604a6208609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, I'm inclined towards freedom with respect to the use of the trademark. I personally was drawn towards the Apache 2.0 license because of its more liberal stance on source code modifications; I worked hard to submit many of our internal projects at Facebook to the ASF against significant internal resistance because I felt that the ASF would uphold this ecumenical stance in the face of corporate interests for control. I'm surprised by the consensus for complex controls versus promiscuity. I'm skeptical of any argument that relies on the ignorance of the customer. When a press release from Company X comes out using the Apache Hadoop name, that raises awareness for the project. Customers are smart enough to ask whether Company X make significant contributions to the Apache Hadoop project, and to discern in what ways the project deviates form the Apache Hadoop releases. We need to consider the benefit as well as the harm to the project when these Apache Hadoop-related projects use the Apache Hadoop trademark: in this particular case, I believe the benefit exceeds the harm. If we were shipping pharmaceuticals or food, I'd feel differently. As it stands, we're shipping software used by highly informed and technical customers. Let's give them the right to make up their mind, and provide further encouragement for other companies to pile on the Apache Hadoop name. Further, enforcing these regulations will require significant manpower. In my experience, the ASF is run by a small and dedicated staff. I'd prefer if their energies were directed towards the maintenance of the infrastructure for hosting and developing projects, as well as the mechanisms for making projects develop more rapidly. While there is great enthusiasm for drafting these rules right now, I suspect that sustained enthusiasm for the enforcement of these rules will prove more difficult to muster. Lastly, I'd love to learn more about how other prominent open source projects have approached this issue. If you have any knowledge about how Linux handled the use of its trademark, please add your thoughts to http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-rules-for-using-the-Linux-trademark-in-a-product-name. Because Apache Hadoop is a kernel technology, similar to Linux, I suspect there are many useful lessons to learn. Or at least crazy email threads to read. Anyways, that's my version of the "the more, the merrier" argument. I'm pretty excited to see EMC and IBM show up on our doorstep. I'd be even more excited to see them contribute code; I suspect that will happen in time, if we create a welcoming community. Later, Jeff ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Shane Curcuru Date: Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: trademarks@apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org One clarification: I've only had time to review the wiki document for some terminology updates, and not for the overall content yet. So from the trademarks@ point of view, more review is needed before we work on making this official. >From the significant amount of discussion in this vote thread, I think it might be good to have the Hadoop PMC and trademarks@ work on getting a more organized consensus first, before voting on an updated proposed Hadoop policy. - Shane Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called > Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/**Defining%20Hadoop< > http://wiki.apache.org/**hadoop/DefiningHadoop>. After some cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a > really good base. I'd like a vote to approve the content (at the current > revision 12) and put the content on our web site. > > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > --0016e6d77df67364e604a6208609-- From general-return-3883-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 08:45:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7FD96DF1 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48420 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:45:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48183 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 08:45:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53869 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 07:25:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of knsathya@hotmail.com designates 65.55.90.48 as permitted sender) Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_85af0a5f-4719-4f3d-81d9-357e284362f0_" X-Originating-IP: [24.130.198.228] From: Sathya Kavacheri To: Subject: vote Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:25:24 -0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2011 07:25:25.0367 (UTC) FILETIME=[38FDA070:01CC2F1B] --_85af0a5f-4719-4f3d-81d9-357e284362f0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 4=2C 6=2C 2=2C 1=2C 5=2C 3 thx = --_85af0a5f-4719-4f3d-81d9-357e284362f0_-- From general-return-3884-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 09:26:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9258668D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10871 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 09:26:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10828 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 09:26:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10820 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 09:26:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:26:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.20 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ranjit@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:25:57 +0000 Received: from dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.77.50]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5K9PHTV067228 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308561919; bh=RfLR4mJA+Mq8SEwn8zwMiGEb1tjTXrGiJ/I3jaivCNA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=r8tua+69XdcgaUHT98faKg08eOiUYOBpr/H0+NdTP0+NQIIu6P3YjCFd8L5N4voU1 Q+SnoMvwhhHOIySAXxwp+ZVXTal+izTAQ8zFuU6w2czTR9SNgPgOOR7csCWhtznIPU ido6ZgU+iZ0I+oGLqw8gYzoYeXn91ujikxYDPIYo= Message-ID: <4DFF11FD.8020507@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:55:17 +0530 From: Ranjit Mathew Organization: Yahoo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06/15/2011 08:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ I think #4 modified slightly to make the elephant run on a wheel or mill like the usual hamster-on-a-wheel thing would be perfect. Ranjit From general-return-3885-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 12:44:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E9461C9 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45852 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45685 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45677 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 12:44:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:44:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:44:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BC9B8091 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:37 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PbLMJBPp9QcC for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70C3B7E2B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:33 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309178599.73771@mqKNf4IdrSu+96Dnqf9oYw Received: from [16.24.203.78] ([16.24.203.78]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5KChJL7020320 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:19 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DFF4061.9060800@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:13 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <92D32E6E-3B65-464F-B91B-4C30EAB2642C@apache.org> <4DF880DA.7060105@apache.org> <4DFB3421.2010902@apache.org> <20110617181725.GB22372@linspire.com> In-Reply-To: <20110617181725.GB22372@linspire.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5KChJL7020320 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 17/06/2011 19:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:01PM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> On 15/06/11 16:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>> also: banners, stickers and clothing? Can I have T-shirts saying "I broke >>>> the hadoop build" with the logo on, or should it be "I broke the Apache >>>> Hadoop build"? >>> >>> I think such a T-shirt should be forcefully worn on any person who did >>> just that. >> >> Here you go with the poster: >> http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/hadoop-components/hadoop-ops/doc/breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp?revision=8630 >> >> I can add it to hadoop-common SVN for people to work on... > > Please do, by all means :) ! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 now, what happens if it gets checked in in a way that breaks the build? That would be too much. From general-return-3886-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 16:39:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 294A763C8 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1142 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 970 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 962 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.243] (HELO nm26-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:47 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.196] by nm26.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 16:39:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.173] by tm9.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 16:39:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1056.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2011 16:39:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 490711.15938.bm@omp1056.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 70324 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308587966; bh=zf1DrDmLwFdpPJZcWu96XFmQ4uT3d5tk4FUye91k2mI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=noNH0ow/cL7ECq4ZXqlF2vEwiPrUbFZoGgME7iLimeHiMeW2Vp9HTsNBzzMoWbnlDzKCoeDVQpYkK0DdvyrxLBMbSlMKyaXGZm0q+d1yK8qmMq24QE5nzkNbpH8PLdKmFgxxeBn8AOwFucyl1z4eaaolWHxISwYPJV73/+m9ciY= Message-ID: <374085.46450.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: syoCJ2EVM1lquKvTfb6Av5QislD0eEhk3CECCkpbmzEbHoO e.VZz2oNC4KbwD4Lxyx8pCjamf3di1MyywLWccG5Vbw9d8OQQqtUd6b2831m iyBWojMsZ_AdvOJq_AymjO_RPs1QwWuNYD_tYvFJZy3EqkvRjjzclKRukiTe Bcvi5Aqs.BIup9vzHPCqGPPi2x6wYSRFV4cT.QrQjHQseanIqO7fhZbkYOUE 1x.ohZil444yYdYtNxbanwKPItj0Ryqk_jQIZibnA4GSLSdcRl33iGr26Ua1 76KT1lIJBRI.0ZXNpjeTjnuHf4iBY34k_Ud_0QdQc6jMPI_blpRtqxatQDuT 5H8nG_ADNenfoKK9uAIKHHOHJLdQymvU1EKlNIDqBlYEe0kjEBiNbrcg7pUz _30UBQTnRFoGL3X.N.UlOcr7.gZQ6lvEP339gF8KD36f2udNnDhrtBPgJ05B HjRJzdKrQekBVi0ECt2ZDIKk_fUWXkGB2lRXCJcwhWEclX9tENtysPujfwX1 b5T7TpCCIB0SChgaiZOhd_Alzm1gAzGJ5ln5t5q0- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:39:26 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:39:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Jeff, First, apologies for removing most of your argument for clarity. Readers can find it in the general@ archives I am sure. > Lastly, I'd love to learn more about how other prominent open source > projects have approached this issue. If you have any knowledge about > how Linux handled the use of its trademark, please add your > thoughts to > http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-rules-for-using-the-Linux-trademark-in-a-product-name. > Because Apache Hadoop is a kernel technology, similar to Linux, I > suspect there are many useful lessons to learn. Or at least crazy > email threads to read. I would argue the concern about trademark has an additional dimension here, and perhaps a fairly core additional motivation to protect, because these are open source projects. The mention of Linux helps to illustrate it. The obvious difference between Hadoop and Linux is Linux has a universally recognized clear hierarchy with a single -- and exceptional, and quickly and forcefully opinionated -- authority at the top. For Linux, the power to define Linux rests obviously with Linus. Regarding Hadoop, the power to do anything, including define what is Hadoop, is diffuse. For would-be open source participants who want to contribute to the Linux kernel, the canonical source of the Linux kernel is clearly Linus' tree and you want your contribution to end up there. He is the authority. Linux will always be defined by Linus until he is gone. (That is a long term problem for Linux of course.) It is a benevolent dictatorship that perhaps uniquely works, allowing enough contributors to see the fruits of their labor to sustain it while simultaneously maintaining a strong identity. Hadoop has no equivalent. Linux, for now at least, can be quite liberal in how the Linux mark is used because of how its identity as a project is defined, therefore its ability to attract contributions. Hadoop I think needs to be more careful. What triggered this discussion is the arrival of new players releasing products they call Hadoop but containing severe changes the community, by way of the ASF umbrella we all work under, had nothing to do with designing or developing. And some of these are being open sourced as a Hadoop. There is no Linus here. Which of these is _the_ Hadoop? As a would-be contributor, which should I select? Already we have some issues. In some cases I'd rather contribute to Cloudera sources because at least I know my contribution to CDH will see a timely release. Furthermore, I believe the extent to which users see value in ASF Hadoop, and have a clear definition of what ASF Hadoop is, will be correlated with the extent to which the ASF can attract enough contributions to Hadoop to sustain innovation against competing technologies. The open source value proposition "I contribute to Hadoop" impacts the long term survival of the project. Individuals and organizations are both motivated by this, for various reasons. - Andy From general-return-3887-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:10:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AA126BF2 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60248 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:10:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60051 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:10:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60029 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:10:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:10:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:10:37 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so3318823vxd.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.49 with SMTP id bp17mr826933vdc.243.1308589816438; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:10:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: <374085.46450.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <374085.46450.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:09:56 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page To: general@hadoop.apache.org, apurtell@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b17232a5dd304a627cf32 --bcaec51b17232a5dd304a627cf32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Great summary Andrew. I would add one more precipitating factor here. That is the arrival of a number of products which are very close to the Apache version of Hadoop but for which there is no good and widely accepted terminology that gives proper credit to their lineage while making clear the distinction from bit-for-bit copies of official Apache releases. Some products are analogous to hive, pig or hbase in that they are independent systems that run ON hadoop (or close equivalents). These have no terminology problem because these products aren't hadoop, but rather use hadoop. Other products contain Hadoop internally as a critical component but do not necessarily expose Hadoop capabilities to the end user (I can't name these products, but they exist). These products have little nomenclatural difficulty because the powerd-by-Hadoop description fits very well. The products with the terminology problem are the ones that are add either curation and packaging (Cloudera) or substantial additional performance enhancing components (MapR). These products are upwardly compatible with Apache Hadoop in that programs that run on Hadoop will very probably run on these Hadoop-like systems. The problem is that there is no good term for these products. They may even contain components that are bit-for-bit identical to the same components for Apache releases. It is fair to say that these are not Apache released software, but it is also fair to say that there ought to be a better name for the class of these products. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Hadoop I think needs to be more careful. What triggered this discussion is > the arrival of new players releasing products they call Hadoop but > containing severe changes the community, by way of the ASF umbrella we all > work under, had nothing to do with designing or developing. And some of > these are being open sourced as a Hadoop. There is no Linus here. Which of > these is _the_ Hadoop? As a would-be contributor, which should I select? > --bcaec51b17232a5dd304a627cf32-- From general-return-3888-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:45:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAFCE605D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33580 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:45:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33508 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53618 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 08:49:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [166.205.139.225] Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:48:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Powered by Hadoop logo From: Steven Phillips To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773e9ae2fb52904a620ce2d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151773e9ae2fb52904a620ce2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4,2,6,1,3,5 --00151773e9ae2fb52904a620ce2d-- From general-return-3889-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:45:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D006B60B0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34606 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:45:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34524 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98277 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 09:14:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of narendra.aaaa@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QkPIUajBhOc+OAj1WlvRrzWcNhApEfgNp5VOmFwglwg=; b=ijdBZGE5L+XFCFywPn4JCVXjmNupSdjviMUIvEcJ2GABAQgBeBQQCYXryC0PG76Glk QDLuHa/r2eaDFmBSeex2cvugqDUIAcVcFu59WErsWU6hmtDhAKdl0eJwtUU6QTSgS5Dc pOWkSzI2Vvql/I39aA92s1eEJ6KB/24K/T6l4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jgH5A6fSOcpUbxrfiFF3rsSYmeKRWjQPiBGabKn2/nb/zM3+CxXABmfjMtsfW7e4Gt 3tPVaw23R0y1omZuE9n3Y2xMHCF7IDxgstJlxTgPf98WScMeoRHDw2GZhINQjBY1da6R BQ8whfziePTFD93G54prSgFUU9VfW1MhnYcSI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:44:20 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: powered by hadoop logo: From: narendra agrawal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636283af213f49004a6212983 --001636283af213f49004a6212983 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 4, 2, 6, 3, 1, 5 --001636283af213f49004a6212983-- From general-return-3890-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:58:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DDE5637F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87576 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:58:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87520 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:58:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87511 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:58:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:57:58 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so1180619gwj.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XpJkrMDFJdWdfav3zWZkXzeDkDP0qF48SANlJ8bA6RA=; b=wZynFhocfVrEsoVk6N23tIuns+GfvyUfMeDd2vO7nSHoAt4Vo4kUYq652ePcQrqb9d 93f0BOqHuiUSfY5gCbJPMGDeMJhZRLZXz9R4kwRAXLEpmtaI/9Oo8dj9HPCmjG2S4Kuz wGTRsyp/JQaTWOgh02I2qB1peme/qdQhs6mtc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gqhK4UaQvMXEShPUAQ8nUKQxzmdiAlVAOD8crf6MsoICmarLqO/FqI/srP3/Q+Gl3o 4VQaCuhgACyvEX5tndcAvv9+0kO4JRbB7HuKoMyVECguCbzbvpQj3bAKLmES+VjniBhS 0p17mlNPLZ88qoeUN16MR2aMimXepcRKSmgUg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.66.65 with SMTP id g41mr5903649yhd.320.1308599857045; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vicaya@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C0Wv2rnx08rbqWDBHiH3mImTI8M Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Luke Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=3D64 pixels in height, where they are completely illegible. I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of the choices: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png Please find the larger version on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 __Luke On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put the= m all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of vo= ting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki= /Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN O= RDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you do= n't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will= automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > From general-return-3891-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:13:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB31A6CE3 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18321 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18255 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18225 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:28 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so3538365vxd.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.72.230 with SMTP id g6mr622385vdv.163.1308600787129; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:12:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501601111d45104a62a5d69 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec501601111d45104a62a5d69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that is being judged here. Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending on the desired final rendition size. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very > disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them > are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels > in height, where they are completely illegible. > > I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of > the choices: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png > > Please find the larger version on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > > __Luke > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > --bcaec501601111d45104a62a5d69-- From general-return-3892-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:16:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC3D8616B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25186 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:16:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25128 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:16:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25120 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:16:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:16:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kntreadway@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:16:19 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4060157bwz.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=KqkIIE9fDxeAVwMPqDOMpyge4yrJ8Ev76iXZbIgcHhY=; b=UWuZ9tv/lxAMcags3EO8cO63fbXbl3kP3Ral4iM1a43J7g3Sm9VAeY/yNMxFAAXYFQ wAqgMDkXIpihr7iY9cNmiWd/tIR/k7iyU5JuJ7sDKHL0O0q2YUgWWsgmyTeAzsxLsej+ ROAcqElsWim7dAJxjiAGSzN8/rxi5dIG3iw9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=WGUNkW3gDKp410yKBA5cPPrFXebB+5cOHQvmLadxlFVYVNW8ICqCAx89L1emvOTDDJ sM6WXALdk0sh7XkzfIZG94jGo+/gIrvL63xeEjgvDQEf5xQTKGFNWoA6X8eeegPi3/eH rbk7j59zB1TUVkAwOyQ0+54QSIvDqSsS9Xdoc= Received: by 10.204.136.144 with SMTP id r16mr1483789bkt.8.1308600959107; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.42.70 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:15:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Nichole Treadway Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:15:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c13ea5200cd04a62a6733 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c13ea5200cd04a62a6733 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5, 6, 2, 4, 1, 3 On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that > is being judged here. > > Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending > on the desired final rendition > size. > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > > > Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very > > disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them > > are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels > > in height, where they are completely illegible. > > > > I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of > > the choices: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png > > > > Please find the larger version on > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > > > > __Luke > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > All, > > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them > > all on a page, here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > --0015174c13ea5200cd04a62a6733-- From general-return-3893-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:26:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D203464AC for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40209 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40147 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:26:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40139 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:26:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:26:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:26:35 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so2540780gxk.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ov1inoUFVCy0lWkM7YtcNs5Q/kiDJyl3pG+2tOkQrc8=; b=eiI8+PMKlN1OOFrbOrNxXww6DWF7gFwW02eXXCfeYcqSkERnJrYhPtgxGGs3PqObQh yfSJoDQu+N35RbSJrXvECshyRTJ0HKB7SSw2tgE3GVuAIOAOKF1x6Nk6X61iKOqt3knR wZRuk1/cq1c30xr+biWH3lVHPB3A+IU0oHIoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=COCdvlq01ZfRvabcekrzjcWqfWChfNm55LXV3jE4BTLXNQyi39E7sp7Ud4GXL+Qz2Y UMO+fbwDah30HIw823OVp53EFuemGCqMuSdK23toNNgZZQCHwcST9suKdKjvginAh2V2 cHaRWfJS8eupg6SvafJ1L6FgyRJeYU4QDW2uk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.174.37 with SMTP id w25mr8788205yhl.186.1308601574629; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vicaya@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0tWvqCleEYaBn-7O30AIsfOCAY4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Luke Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Agreed. My suggestion is essentially thematic as well, as the Apache theme is mostly missing from the rest of the entries. My suggestion emphasizes more on Apache and Hadoop rather than the proverbial elephant. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation th= at > is being judged here. > > Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes dependin= g > on the desired final rendition > size. > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=3D64 pixels >> in height, where they are completely illegible. >> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of >> the choices: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.p= ng >> >> Please find the larger version on >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 >> >> __Luke >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >> > All, >> > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them >> all on a page, here: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> > >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> > >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> > >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. >> > >> > -- Owen >> > >> > >> > >> > From general-return-3894-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:43:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0AA06EF6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64122 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:43:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64065 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:43:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64057 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:43:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:43:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:43:29 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2160958vws.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QwIrDQ03OahJJiTmx8LuiltHd8OLPOSkUqR+AbOElBU=; b=BwD2NbYilpbdIIkBx6xOUKOxp9Suq+6ms7Yw89T5UrVGXKQfTGTL5qUqP+hisWv7Rb ZY8a1n3JoNO8Gqit90gVK5GGO831uWaWiGE6yqQmx2aTgfrbpqvPOdIOfnDi0LmLo0n3 guhOlnbqsjdZN2CeCfHzCyZeTi93Fdqt2vSbw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=yHe8yH+vTAPY9WIqZ+Tir+JRMbXXWodvUzzCdc3xYWkLldMWG0+ZNxqdjReq9IeUyo mOo9orE01HI0iXTPVC7Pd5YsYMvjJk7BdHFErLD3PDdsaDpx7phAOl+gtuglB8VtHAMf cwQhS1eeBqsUAKkiv2od0oJx3SbsTbA8+qXkA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.39.2 with SMTP id d2mr1927601vce.274.1308602587912; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.96.14 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:43:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee9e467984d04a62ac876 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54ee9e467984d04a62ac876 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can we still submit logos ? On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very > disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them > are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels > in height, where they are completely illegible. > > I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of > the choices: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png > > Please find the larger version on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > > __Luke > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > > --bcaec54ee9e467984d04a62ac876-- From general-return-3895-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65D296248 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67419 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:45:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67325 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:45:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67317 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:45:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:45:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sradia@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:45:22 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5KKikbd085856 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:44:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308602686; bh=35UMOcY00mVkGQ3qQsKvaobRLGN79OQeAbZYYGkkilU=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=B6A01vJVf0mw5IuTIs/OPA7GgKaGRTGvzJ9lZv0V2GzwMMCH6zWsZe6eqfQLfLZ5/ o8VPBnopKivw89+LApOJDfWQzHeRcyAXqLcQcZN/Xwf4colR9G/MxBJ8w24KhLWiFd bu26rRoGUZdAl3G0a8KR40RUkKlUgrB5U7ii7PRE= Message-Id: <8186AF6A-8B9A-4BC2-A374-B819B81F4831@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:44:46 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:15 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the > NG NR effort. > > Are folks ok with this? +1 sanjay > > thanks, > Arun > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" > wrote: > >> NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better >> for >> users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development >> process. >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson >> wrote: >> >>>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>> From general-return-3896-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:57:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB7076A44 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87396 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:57:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87337 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87329 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:57:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:57:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:57:29 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so2558308gxk.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:57:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gw7QO7906E6OYmtuXEgKlR+iX6ApfiFAuZKcFLpmgXc=; b=Ked3sGLU9J/fJ9Z7pRn6a+ftBdcpi7rtDIyxrfA5tlroYmm0tTrzl7PChGlABuS6Qq 2PJzDqwlSZLCT9Gv/NC2LQq35ScWdepe4+at5J3StV5SiykZrWKxt80e5IqNwTdeRF/m Ml3px8+Yi7BA9QmvcsIuo3NMRcQhhRATru4R8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hzDHCknAHCabMR3zPIZ6KtV1LUQuxAYLFRSnlwKQmWv7CK9DPJYlC7uzthOu/DbBP0 fv5/FnwMQUU8nKKDugUlaJpqw0JcSmHQgkFw5IsGofV8yJw4ygIe2YTTUts8sMzgBmvK 4SF1mdItOJJ3tIf/jsreEuWCZ7SaDPTOwFq4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.154.201 with SMTP id h49mr8862110yhk.119.1308603428553; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vicaya@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:57:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:57:08 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oDwzRiq62ZjHMBF57WYjkbtKk_w Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Luke Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service wrote: > Can we still submit logos ? I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with input/ideas from all the submissions. > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=3D64 pixels >> in height, where they are completely illegible. >> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of >> the choices: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.p= ng >> >> Please find the larger version on >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 >> >> __Luke >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >> > All, >> > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put = them >> all on a page, here: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> > >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> > >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> > >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. >> > >> > -- Owen >> > >> > >> > >> > From general-return-3897-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:13:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4407E6574 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19464 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:13:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19407 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19399 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:13:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:13:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:12:56 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so3603756vxd.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.179.130 with SMTP id dg2mr4599540vdc.203.1308604355065; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:12:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:12:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171ecdbc369904a62b3173 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5171ecdbc369904a62b3173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no decision at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done by our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus. My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precise content. Adding new options tends to value small details in content over consensus. I would prefer to not muddy the issue further. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service wrote: > > Can we still submit logos ? > > I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to > HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach > files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The > final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with > input/ideas from all the submissions. > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > > > >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very > >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them > >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels > >> in height, where they are completely illegible. > >> > >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of > >> the choices: > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png > >> > >> Please find the larger version on > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > >> > >> __Luke > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> > All, > >> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put > them > >> all on a page, here: > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > >> > > >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > >> > > >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > >> > > >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. > >> > > >> > -- Owen > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > --bcaec5171ecdbc369904a62b3173-- From general-return-3898-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:19:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8CA4671B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40070 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:19:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40012 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40004 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:19:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:19:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:19:08 +0000 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so1392094wyb.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.217.7.3 with SMTP id z3mr5174722wes.68.1308604727310; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:18:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent > consensus being formed. =A0That will result in the same result as no deci= sion > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). > > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. =A0The only substantive > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants > nose). =A0Font size can and will be adjusted. =A0That adjustment will be = done by > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus= . > If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is the same design element used throughout MapR.com. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3899-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:31:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D87A6535 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63135 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63078 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63070 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:31:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:31:05 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so3826007pve.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pqLDIMVmUxb056EoVAXDreDGH3bNlq7iwfX0X4F4uWg=; b=QJ6VJZMIX2hgysllkTR82600CHMI6LOsvjsTG79AA7GsshiIwjB4z0Op9Xm0OFos0l TGCd4KDx8cRZ/WQhRC7I3kimR26TengoY3o4Rv0S3S5o0PY1sWK7Mt5RvuTffUZ9pmAn DnfL8XsIgCqozqSndOsImqkRCSy5brPk8BWwI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ar6Wu+AUVgpFIaMj2Mq4Qb1zIS+a9H7NIdAbVVjuTGWfILJTpAyyvtHy3nvt511IWu VtlTX2IurXzc/HriOZQRONyoODWh5AFJwSjUZuujxTngqti2gcrjfCMfFzkiuXFveJ6p j1rVfdqMGpc+1Vmqu6M//fc5V6AziZ8E8jcH4= Received: by 10.142.4.10 with SMTP id 10mr482357wfd.361.1308605443508; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.92.11 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Jakob Homan Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:30:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Whatever gets picked, I volunteer to have some stickers printed up so we can all put them on our bikesheds. Seems appropriate. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrot= e: >> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent >> consensus being formed. =A0That will result in the same result as no dec= ision >> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). >> >> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. =A0The only substantive >> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the >> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephant= s >> nose). =A0Font size can and will be adjusted. =A0That adjustment will be= done by >> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensu= s. >> > > If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the > circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is > the same design element used throughout MapR.com. > > Thanks, > Eli > From general-return-3900-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:43:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 716AE66CB for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79418 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:43:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79351 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:43:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79343 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:43:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:43:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:43:00 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so3552032yxd.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:42:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/wZMfD7rAEP0L4IGtgEpJjTObNorYBFOdSfnZmTKrgU=; b=xFhsIDNGBZb8n0Rir8iJs0GepW8HBPfmy+5D33u7MwSLkAESMnziS1+GUw2iglEk7z zwzIoMQDsn6raj77rRI9WuYiaBKI9SBEthY1+ch1GgJ460w/E0H8Tq7M5oK7F7YnDDfJ pvdgpxwd9udeL+xli5SV9o4XCw1QvkojvlX3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cTZo+ox4ATiXLsmRCTvRoqnmpcTmTtB3yUmarpCjXybMsn3SQDuChqSHf4703/0/qZ vlBREQf1FFBeMk0PPetHUwAKLt8Cen+pHHqx+ikvgFrWhkVOlzZutLY56KoRvpNl+OcU OjjzK89mnvDfbdSVRfBiA9mhrrRtS2pWP7UyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.28.2 with SMTP id f2mr6570257yha.387.1308606159725; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vicaya@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.111.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:42:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:42:39 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AQzNQrMkswW8NShqOmDfTxUMMTM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Luke Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent > consensus being formed. =A0That will result in the same result as no deci= sion > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). The the binding votes are from limited number of PMC members. I see no obstacle reaching consensus even if we have much larger number of selections. > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. =A0The only substantive > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants > nose). Elephant's nose is a versatile hand. What political sub-text are you talking about? I see no problem with an elephant upholding an apache feather. OTOH, feather in hand/nose is not the most substantive element rather than playful variation. The key element is the theme of apache and hadoop bigger than the proverbial elephant. > =A0Font size can and will be adjusted. =A0That adjustment will be done by > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus= . Since you eluded aesthetic and political sub-text, the MapR circle is problematic as well, which IMO looks like a plastic button or a deformed mouse wheel confining the elephant. > My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precis= e > content. =A0Adding new options tends to value small details in content ov= er > consensus. =A0I would prefer to not muddy the issue further. Again, I see no problem reaching a consensus here, given the limited number of binding votes. > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service wrote: >> > Can we still submit logos ? >> >> I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to >> HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach >> files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The >> final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with >> input/ideas from all the submissions. >> >> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu wrote: >> > >> >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very >> >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them >> >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=3D64 pix= els >> >> in height, where they are completely illegible. >> >> >> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of >> >> the choices: >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.p= ng >> >> >> >> Please find the larger version on >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 >> >> >> >> __Luke >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> >> > All, >> >> > =A0 We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've p= ut >> them >> >> all on a page, here: >> >> > >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ >> >> > >> >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round= of >> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important >> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. >> >> > >> >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. >> >> > >> >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, = you >> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your v= ote >> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice. >> >> > >> >> > -- Owen >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > From general-return-3901-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 22:20:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A559061B9 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37872 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37811 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37803 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:20:14 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2255720vws.35 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.170 with SMTP id iz10mr2301456vdb.123.1308608393040; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:19:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:19:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54867446ad4b604a62c2299 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54867446ad4b604a62c2299 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ? Are you talking about color palette choices? We use a pretty ordinary corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important. Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ? I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo on mapr.com at this time. We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approved). How would you suggest adjusting the circle? On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent > > consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no > decision > > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). > > > > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive > > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the > > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants > > nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done > by > > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted > consensus. > > > > If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the > circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is > the same design element used throughout MapR.com. > > Thanks, > Eli > --bcaec54867446ad4b604a62c2299-- From general-return-3902-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 22:44:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 545996EB4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85412 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85357 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85349 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:44:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:44:19 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5406699wwi.29 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:43:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.61.8 with SMTP id v8mr1494751wec.83.1308609838074; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:43:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:43:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > ? > > Are you talking about color palette choices? =A0We use a pretty ordinary > corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important. > > Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element > like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ? > Yup. > I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo o= n > mapr.com at this time. =A0We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approv= ed). > > How would you suggest adjusting the circle? > Would be good for it not to re-use the same circular border, ie the design elements should be visually distinct. Assume the artist just used the existing design element they had and wrapped it around the Hadoop logo vs creating a new one. Thanks, Eli > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >> > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent >> > consensus being formed. =A0That will result in the same result as no >> decision >> > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own). >> > >> > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. =A0The only substantiv= e >> > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the >> > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elepha= nts >> > nose). =A0Font size can and will be adjusted. =A0That adjustment will = be done >> by >> > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted >> consensus. >> > >> >> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the >> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is >> the same design element used throughout MapR.com. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> > From general-return-3903-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 11:28:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 145BD48D5 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40382 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 11:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40317 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 11:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40309 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 11:28:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:28:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:28:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F7B809C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:41 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QMvY+yJjFGBv for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E469B80B3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:37 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309260443.91675@5t0u0jyjgKeAV5smAO2fxw Received: from [16.24.213.88] ([16.24.213.88]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5LBRNED019846 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E008016.9010009@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:27:18 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release References: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4C60EEFE-1183-47DD-9E2E-EB6EFF589727@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5LBRNED019846 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 17/06/2011 21:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> >> On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> Yahoo stands ready to help us (the Apache Hadoop Community) turn this new release into a stable release by running it through its 9 month test and burn in process. The result of that will be another stable release such as 0.18, 0.20 or 0.20.203 (hadoop with security). >> >> >> I'd consider 0.20.203 pseudo-stable. > > Actually, I was just reminded about the complete disaster that is metrics. So while it may be pseudo-stable, it isn't actually usable for anyone but Yahoo!. ooh, I have work on that that I should catch up with and get in. I'd also like to put in the IBM JVM patch, not out of personal need, but because I don't like Oracle-JVM dependencies, and it'd be nice to get IBM's donation into the source tree. From general-return-3904-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 11:39:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E44BB4259 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74528 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 11:39:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74477 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 11:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74448 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 11:39:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:39:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:39:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C03B1BA914 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5TST5NRzmptG for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1951BA8D6 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:24 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309261150.7834@rpS+vPppXzKfT0lFPRn7Ww Received: from [16.24.213.88] ([16.24.213.88]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5LBdANS020209 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:10 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:39:05 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5LBdANS020209 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release > tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release > vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries. > One limitation with releases has always been size of cluster testing -where Yahoo!s contributions have been invaluable. That said, we shouldn't make them an SPOF in the release process; we should all set up to do some more release testing. Looking round my house I see that I have 1 linux desktop, 4 linux laptops (All Ubuntu 10.04) , 2 OS/X machines and an OLPC, plus three WebOS phones that can take a JVM, all connected via a netgear N600 router, (ignoring CentOS virtual machine images). If I can actually bring up a heterogenous cluster here then it would be a contribution, and I'm sure others have equal messes of home and work systems that could be used to test bad system configurations. If successful we can add a netgear 802.11 {a, b, g, n} router to the list of switches known to work once you get DNS right. What would be good here is more documentation on how the beta testers can generate realistic loads to stress our clusters, using the stress test tools that are already in the codebase. I guess I may start on that if/when I start playing with the tools. -Steve From general-return-3905-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 18:40:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67CB64D70 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13719 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13671 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13663 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:40:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.145] (HELO homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:40:37 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365E51F008B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:40:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=OrUctrTVve1bdoExAngmbunXPegJbciDjor9EoDNVHNe/OpwhCWh KPDEXDvTyyjTf3aInvKl2oDGG5ynhpuU8pTuNAMrco38imbpgLn25ZSKCkgF0Zam m7QRV7zVm1yBtlmItzhP2BpAF9fJ5VvA/N6Ze7MjJx18jY2JoT1v1lE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=QLXsnauWYv5ltnr7YzXJUMpG0Fk=; b=G3y3ij8DOGaQzQNtE9U6DJDv5y0P 9rbHPliNKicUb1feOXw3wc69OrU/alo7YhDG/yv5VHU6oFrTtw9kMVngAOG+eBg6 RdeNh9p3B74DQtkteRu3NPVcMds1jvu2ohEtEFn4UdRphOe9IPQT2if0fXYa2FML BN9qot+JDvZmO4o= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D35471F0084 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:40:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release >> tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a = release >> vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries. >=20 > One limitation with releases has always been size of cluster testing = -where Yahoo!s contributions have been invaluable. That said, we = shouldn't make them an SPOF in the release process; we should all set up = to do some more release testing. Yes, more testing is better, but if it can't be tested by the dev team in 72 hours then it doesn't belong in our release process. Please note that one of the main advantages of open source development is that the bulk of testing/QA occurs *after* the release. That's why labels like alpha/beta/GA are best applied/updated after the version = number has been cut and the software has been proven in real deployments. If testing on 5000 nodes is important to our customers, then add a scale-tested metric to the download site so that the customers know which release package has been tested at what scale -- they will understand the difference between frequent releases and those fully = tested at scale. Let them decide which version is best to use for their own = needs. ....Roy From general-return-3906-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 18:43:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC454EBD for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19348 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19295 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19287 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:43:45 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:43:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:43:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:42 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > If I can actually bring up a heterogenous cluster here I believe there was a post in one of the mailing lists in the = past 6 months where someone tried a mixed endian grid. It blew up big = time.= From general-return-3907-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 19:05:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7E594D1F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66307 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:05:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66261 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66252 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 19:05:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:05:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:04:56 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so91024vxd.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.115.130 with SMTP id jo2mr222131vdb.43.1308683075080; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:04:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:04:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a95dd0519904a63d85c0 --bcaec548a95dd0519904a63d85c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For the pain in doing this, it is probably better to just drop $10 and bring up a nice EC2 cluster with 10 m1.large instances using spot pricing for 5 hours. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > If I can actually bring up a heterogenous cluster here > > I believe there was a post in one of the mailing lists in the past 6 > months where someone tried a mixed endian grid. It blew up big time. --bcaec548a95dd0519904a63d85c0-- From general-return-3908-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 19:09:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C4154DEE for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69568 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:09:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69516 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:09:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69508 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 19:09:13 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:09:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:09:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:09:12 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <314AE6A6-9EFF-4B8A-BA70-A223045BEEC9@apache.org> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > For the pain in doing this, it is probably better to just drop $10 and = bring > up a nice EC2 cluster with 10 m1.large instances using spot pricing = for 5 > hours. Testing on non-Intel, non-Linux is something we need to do more = of. Amazon won't help us there, AFAIK.= From general-return-3909-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 19:11:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CED34017 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73481 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73345 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:11:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73337 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 19:11:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:11:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:11:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 25923 invoked by uid 507); 21 Jun 2011 19:11:16 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.862733 secs); 21 Jun 2011 19:11:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 21 Jun 2011 19:11:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABD93DC00A; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:13:04 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMOodzAS43xw; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:13:03 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.57] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.57]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017FD3DC009; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:13:02 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E00F451.1070406@uci.cu> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:13:13 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Allen Wittenauer Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> <314AE6A6-9EFF-4B8A-BA70-A223045BEEC9@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314AE6A6-9EFF-4B8A-BA70-A223045BEEC9@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010509090409040004040608" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------010509090409040004040608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit For example in Solaris and BSD´s systems Right? regards On 06/21/2011 02:39 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> For the pain in doing this, it is probably better to just drop $10 and bring >> up a nice EC2 cluster with 10 m1.large instances using spot pricing for 5 >> hours. > > Testing on non-Intel, non-Linux is something we need to do more of. Amazon won't help us there, AFAIK. -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 --------------010509090409040004040608-- From general-return-3910-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 19:12:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D2784041 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74900 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:12:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74851 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74843 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 19:12:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:12:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:12:08 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so99136vws.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.179.130 with SMTP id dg2mr6308538vdc.203.1308683507038; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: <314AE6A6-9EFF-4B8A-BA70-A223045BEEC9@apache.org> References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> <314AE6A6-9EFF-4B8A-BA70-A223045BEEC9@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:11:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171ecd8f7b1104a63d9fa3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5171ecd8f7b1104a63d9fa3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Amazon can help with the non-linux, but not with the non-Intel. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > For the pain in doing this, it is probably better to just drop $10 and > bring > > up a nice EC2 cluster with 10 m1.large instances using spot pricing for 5 > > hours. > > > Testing on non-Intel, non-Linux is something we need to do more of. > Amazon won't help us there, AFAIK. --bcaec5171ecd8f7b1104a63d9fa3-- From general-return-3911-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:28:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 941CA4785 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2383 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2331 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2323 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:28:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:28:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of makrai.list@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:28:10 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so190763vxd.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BFuYboshZd2xJnQ55POK+n1qwBRBb621TPih/r0tExE=; b=HRfNcFaYvx+5AjIl3wvOlcoGyu/4ELyGBopL8ROU5dPYFLcukayCOPVjSn/VLXBEsl NFkHi/h825E1Jerf2kQO1B5T9E9aB8uAO6lxdxPfA0zcJqGLW4OKzj6SmiaXUgWQHBJh CD8sD9iCjNXShcQXP3/1zLozm2Fg6sf1zZctk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=w2dOPIwcxiRErWEoxAuTsKj25PHow+O+hu2fphp23SyofeUkDSDKzyTOttSlUIgdcP a7IXkEz2bp/PCMyZ9d//zWWtEifSDcwd3c0tEiUaqjopyrUuvKaTAfycuXpWYo1nFvW4 Gh7HmpOy/d82s+34xVDYG4zXY/MAg69bAw74s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.34 with SMTP id ef2mr268429vdb.293.1308688069716; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.109.69 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:27:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Large startup time in remote MapReduce job From: Gabor Makrai To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f3528846c4504a63eafcd --20cf307f3528846c4504a63eafcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone, I have a little problem with running MapReduce jobs. I have a pretty large Java program (my jar size is more than 20MB) , where I implemented a MapReduce job. I tested it in my local cluster, and it worked fine. But I tried it with low-bandwith Internet access and I experienced very-very slow job starting time :( I guess my whole JAR file was uploaded, because I experienced unusual upgoing network traffic. Could anyone tell me how can I solve this problem? Thanks, Gabor --20cf307f3528846c4504a63eafcd-- From general-return-3912-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:32:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FF0D428F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16265 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:32:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16210 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:32:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16202 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:32:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:32:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:32:03 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so112199qwj.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.49.133 with SMTP id v5mr5563068qcf.165.1308688303105; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.7 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:31:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:01:23 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Large startup time in remote MapReduce job To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Gabor, If your jar does not contain code changes that need to get transmitted every time, you can consider placing them on the JT/TT classpaths and not do any jar registration in your job submission code. You'll see a related WARN but it should be OK to ignore that. If not, work on other ways to get your jar size reduced. Does it really contain 20 MB worth of user code or is that with libraries? On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Gabor Makrai wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a little problem with running MapReduce jobs. > I have a pretty large Java program (my jar size is more than 20MB) , where I > implemented a MapReduce job. I tested it in my local cluster, and it worked > fine. But I tried it with low-bandwith Internet access and I experienced > very-very slow job starting time :( I guess my whole JAR file was uploaded, > because I experienced unusual upgoing network traffic. > Could anyone tell me how can I solve this problem? > > Thanks, > Gabor > -- Harsh J From general-return-3913-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:58:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AB144EA8 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62135 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:58:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62079 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62071 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:58:40 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:58:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:58:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Large startup time in remote MapReduce job From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:58:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <12015E99-0D45-4837-9C68-69148A8C32E4@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Gabor, >=20 > If your jar does not contain code changes that need to get transmitted > every time, you can consider placing them on the JT/TT classpaths ... which means you get to bounce your system every time you = change code. > and > not do any jar registration in your job submission code. You'll see a > related WARN but it should be OK to ignore that. >=20 > If not, work on other ways to get your jar size reduced. Does it > really contain 20 MB worth of user code or is that with libraries? Harsh is on the right track. Break your jar up into multiple chunks, putting the fairly = static pieces into a distributed cache. See = http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#How_do_I_submit_extra_content_.28jars.2C= _static_files.2C_etc.29_for_my_job_to_use_during_runtime.3F for more = info. From general-return-3914-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 21:03:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CFB944E0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71336 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:03:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71277 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:03:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71253 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:03:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:03:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:03:33 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so132260qwj.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.138.16 with SMTP id y16mr5408859qat.3.1308690193065; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:03:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.7 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12015E99-0D45-4837-9C68-69148A8C32E4@apache.org> References: <12015E99-0D45-4837-9C68-69148A8C32E4@apache.org> From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:32:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Large startup time in remote MapReduce job To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: makrai.list@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Allen, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Harsh J wrote: > >> Gabor, >> >> If your jar does not contain code changes that need to get transmitted >> every time, you can consider placing them on the JT/TT classpaths > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... which means you get to bounce your system every time y= ou change code. Its ugly, but if the jar filename remains the same there shouldn't need to be any bouncing. Doable if there's no activity at replacement point of time? P.s. Gabor: Moving the discussion to mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Please use the general@ list only for general project-wide discussions on Hadoop. --=20 Harsh J From general-return-3915-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 21:57:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BE1B44D9 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72833 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:57:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72790 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72782 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:57:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:57:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:57:39 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:57:19 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:58:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond Thread-Index: AcwwXjFkHwqoUfRaSWK3n2KUovcGMA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 6/17/11 11:50 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >Producing a stable release of Hadoop is a long, hard and expensive >process. Historically Y! has produced all such releases. Other releases >of Hadoop have either not been stable (Hadoop 0.19 and Hadoop 0.21) You lost me there. Enough Y! Chest pounding. Your contributions are large and important, but not every release not tested by Y! is destined for failure. 0.19.x eventually was stable and an improvement over 0.18.x in several critical ways (I used it in production for a year and relied on several new features). 0.19.0 was broken, append needed to be disabled, etc. But by the end after testing in the community, (by research institutions and smaller corporations) and some bug fix releases it became stable. From general-return-3916-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 09:18:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3156B85 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96385 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 09:18:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96188 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 09:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96180 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 09:18:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:18:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:18:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8881EB8125 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:17:47 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MoR47i6xvfIH for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:17:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23B3B8123 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:17:46 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309338976.73388@/+4FyQxpho9PzCHibl444Q Received: from [16.24.212.58] ([16.24.212.58]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5M9GGwI020691 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:16:16 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E01B2DB.3050503@apache.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:16:11 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <82A248C7-D17B-4AD3-A8B2-75F91E89F600@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5M9GGwI020691 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 21/06/2011 20:04, Ted Dunning wrote: > For the pain in doing this, it is probably better to just drop $10 and bring > up a nice EC2 cluster with 10 m1.large instances using spot pricing for 5 > hours. this lacks the mess of networking that is common in the outside world From general-return-3917-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 09:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DC146BCD for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16436 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 09:31:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16354 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 09:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16313 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 09:31:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:31:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:30:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C709DB8125 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:30:35 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ks3SOSGOmGpo for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:30:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37CCB8123 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:30:34 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309339821.13194@MzEi+1wpKu4BRcJdeL/xdQ Received: from [16.24.212.58] ([16.24.212.58]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5M9UKYi021101 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:30:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E01B627.6000304@apache.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:30:15 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5M9UKYi021101 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 21/06/2011 19:40, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release >>> tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release >>> vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries. >> >> One limitation with releases has always been size of cluster testing -where Yahoo!s contributions have been invaluable. That said, we shouldn't make them an SPOF in the release process; we should all set up to do some more release testing. > > Yes, more testing is better, but if it can't be tested by the dev team > in 72 hours then it doesn't belong in our release process. > > Please note that one of the main advantages of open source development > is that the bulk of testing/QA occurs *after* the release. That's why > labels like alpha/beta/GA are best applied/updated after the version number > has been cut and the software has been proven in real deployments. > If testing on 5000 nodes is important to our customers, then add a > scale-tested metric to the download site so that the customers know > which release package has been tested at what scale -- they will > understand the difference between frequent releases and those fully tested > at scale. Let them decide which version is best to use for their own needs. I agree with in-field testing; the big issue there is that people who do have 1+PB of data are nervous about Hadoop upgrades, JVM upgrades. I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath. It's the cost of loss of data that raises concerns, not the loss of time in testing and rolling back [1]. And very few people have 500+ node clusters sitting around idle. I like the point about mixed endian; Sparc may be dead but there are other architectures out there, and Arm looks up and coming. Then there are bits of the config space like a block replication factor of 2 that can be tested at small scale. -steve [1] Steve reverted his work desktop from RHEL6 to Ubuntu 10.04 last week and, after discussion with his 9 year old sun, is going to switch back to Firefox 3.6 as it does better flash games) From general-return-3918-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 15:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36D146482 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3087 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 15:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3014 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 15:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3001 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 15:42:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:42:23 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c147.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.147]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5MFfXRY069919; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:41:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308757294; bh=HO8U8E3uEvSlDTYGn7S8b3HGnJLTWDMtM81AGWs2krA=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=K600aoLqOeKl2u0LnyNoczSSBHbWT37QTnDXd9olOHKpPJjjCZF2KrD/F53Q/nieC tVhd9hK3r1LKCw9rWVNpuf6+6UCa7ygpay0HLJLyzP1itpMbCH4PQvdJ/cRHiK4vcY +EUJqjukbclP3RQl3HuoCm5PQOMUs06uWN9+n7Gw= Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:41:33 -0700 Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A3DB5BA-925A-4A67-ADC9-B984CBF1D004@yahoo-inc.com> References: <374085.46450.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I agree with this. We need to find a middle ground that achieves three aims: 1) Makes it clear that an ASF release of Hadoop is THE APACHE HADOOP. = Jeff's manpower argument actually reinforces this. We need a very = testable definition of what is an Apache Hadoop Release or enforcement = will be impossible because each test of the policy might require a visit = to the supreme court. It's MD5 matches the MD5 of an apache release is = a clear definition. 2) We need a proposal for derived products that vendors feel are = branding friendly. These should be clear enough that users understand = the difference between a product that packages Apache Hadoop (MD5 test), = one that is completely open source under the Apache license (easy to = test) and one that simply uses some subset of the code under a more = restrictive license or closed source. 3) Compatibility: I think it would be great to harness all this energy = around compatibility to start a compatibility suite inside the Apache = Hadoop project. Then we could define compatible with Apache Hadoop in a = clear way controlled by the Apache Hadoop PMC. With luck vendors on = both sides of the debate will be incentivized to contribute to the = project this way. Such a suite would also prove useful to the = developers of Apache Hadoop. E14 On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Great summary Andrew. >=20 > I would add one more precipitating factor here. That is the arrival = of a > number of products which are very close to the Apache version of = Hadoop but > for which there is no good and widely accepted terminology that gives = proper > credit to their lineage while making clear the distinction from = bit-for-bit > copies of official Apache releases. >=20 > Some products are analogous to hive, pig or hbase in that they are > independent systems that run ON hadoop (or close equivalents). These = have > no terminology problem because these products aren't hadoop, but = rather use > hadoop. >=20 > Other products contain Hadoop internally as a critical component but = do not > necessarily expose Hadoop capabilities to the end user (I can't name = these > products, but they exist). These products have little nomenclatural > difficulty because the powerd-by-Hadoop description fits very well. >=20 > The products with the terminology problem are the ones that are add = either > curation and packaging (Cloudera) or substantial additional = performance > enhancing components (MapR). These products are upwardly compatible = with > Apache Hadoop in that programs that run on Hadoop will very probably = run on > these Hadoop-like systems. The problem is that there is no good term = for > these products. They may even contain components that are bit-for-bit > identical to the same components for Apache releases. It is fair to = say > that these are not Apache released software, but it is also fair to = say that > there ought to be a better name for the class of these products. >=20 > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Purtell = wrote: >=20 >> Hadoop I think needs to be more careful. What triggered this = discussion is >> the arrival of new players releasing products they call Hadoop but >> containing severe changes the community, by way of the ASF umbrella = we all >> work under, had nothing to do with designing or developing. And some = of >> these are being open sourced as a Hadoop. There is no Linus here. = Which of >> these is _the_ Hadoop? As a would-be contributor, which should I = select? >>=20 From general-return-3919-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 16:27:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 800AE6419 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 526 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 16:27:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 456 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 16:27:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 448 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 16:27:00 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:27:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:27:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4E01B627.6000304@apache.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:27:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <4E01B627.6000304@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >=20 > I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs = underneath. Yes you do. :D From general-return-3920-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 20:27:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BB966B58 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16278 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16223 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16215 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.16] (HELO EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:27:02 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.16]) with mapi; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:42 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:27:29 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: AcwxGrJdy2N367J0RJiueePq8AbC2A== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1F501BC2-7671-45B5-8D31-599C25068191@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 "Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that option is discouraged." I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM and OS version was the problem seen? CompressedOops had several issues prior to Jre 6u20, and a few minor ones were fixed in u21. FWIW, I now exclusively use 64 bit w/ CompressedOops for all Hadoop and non-Hadoop apps and have seen no issues. It is the default in 6u24 and 6u25 on a 64 bit JVM. On 6/14/11 5:16 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: > >While we're looking at the wiki, could folks update >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions with whatever versions >of Hadoop they are using successfully? > >Thanks. > >P.S., yes, I'm thinking about upgrading ours. :p From general-return-3921-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 20:50:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DE346BF0 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45687 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 20:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45477 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 20:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45469 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 20:50:01 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:50:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:50:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:49:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8460D6B5-E8F3-4FCC-8765-655A247ED6EB@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > "Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed > Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that > option is discouraged." > > I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM > and OS version was the problem seen? That is definitely dated. Those were problems from 18 and 19. > > CompressedOops had several issues prior to Jre 6u20, and a few minor ones > were fixed in u21. FWIW, I now exclusively use 64 bit w/ CompressedOops > for all Hadoop and non-Hadoop apps and have seen no issues. It is the > default in 6u24 and 6u25 on a 64 bit JVM. We use compressedoops on 21 every-so-often as well. Feel free to edit that whole section. :) Thanks! From general-return-3922-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 02:42:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B49074FA1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43563 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:42:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43247 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43239 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 02:42:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:42:22 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:42:01 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:42:48 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: AcwxTyDBwhQDXYqyTSqXa0mC/LF0vg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8460D6B5-E8F3-4FCC-8765-655A247ED6EB@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/22/11 1:49 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: > >On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > >> "Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed >> Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that >> option is discouraged." >>=20 >> I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What >>JVM >> and OS version was the problem seen? > >That is definitely dated. Those were problems from 18 and 19. > >>=20 >> CompressedOops had several issues prior to Jre 6u20, and a few minor >>ones >> were fixed in u21. FWIW, I now exclusively use 64 bit w/ CompressedOops >> for all Hadoop and non-Hadoop apps and have seen no issues. It is the >> default in 6u24 and 6u25 on a 64 bit JVM. > > We use compressedoops on 21 every-so-often as well. > > Feel free to edit that whole section. :) > > Thanks! Updated the CompressedOops section. I am using 6u25 in production and have used 6u24 as well. (64 bit version, CentOS 5.5) We usually roll out JVM's to a subset of nodes, then after a little burn-in to the whole thing. First on development / qa clusters (which are just as busy as production, but smaller), then production. > From general-return-3923-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 06:22:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7462849BB for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49437 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 06:22:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47452 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 06:22:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47443 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 06:22:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:22:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:21:56 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c88.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.88]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5N6LBgv015566 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308810073; bh=5+RqFgfrxedFNuLLjlEjQ/ZNovQimedHEjJ1DjpGOBo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=Qbs6I9Q0n/U5w3azv+bRPs5/exnFhGAezbnO3BCdbFXzZtaLHCoUPGhOOEwGIf+52 jVBNzmrA28/gLrmyihCjIjeeShemyHHOr6JvwEHqsA64zfIc4DOpsldV/abI0Fb7rq xXW24+ryIAnSXxcZbLOCVtX/ArWA7k2Cs/4y1IPw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:21:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Yup. Frequent releases, some focused on getting to stable on older code = lines, some pushing new code out for people to try. On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >=20 >> On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release >>> tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a = release >>> vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody = tries. >>=20 >> One limitation with releases has always been size of cluster testing = -where Yahoo!s contributions have been invaluable. That said, we = shouldn't make them an SPOF in the release process; we should all set up = to do some more release testing. >=20 > Yes, more testing is better, but if it can't be tested by the dev team > in 72 hours then it doesn't belong in our release process. >=20 > Please note that one of the main advantages of open source development > is that the bulk of testing/QA occurs *after* the release. That's why > labels like alpha/beta/GA are best applied/updated after the version = number > has been cut and the software has been proven in real deployments. > If testing on 5000 nodes is important to our customers, then add a > scale-tested metric to the download site so that the customers know > which release package has been tested at what scale -- they will > understand the difference between frequent releases and those fully = tested > at scale. Let them decide which version is best to use for their own = needs. >=20 > ....Roy >=20 From general-return-3924-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 12:48:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABA384C1B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63942 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 12:48:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63821 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 12:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63812 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 12:48:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:48:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2600F1BA969 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:47:53 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ov5AnUaevmrO for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:47:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FB91BA937 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:47:52 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309438056.67389@DBsYd2iZiQJP1WqwXTpnQQ Received: from [16.24.224.182] ([16.24.224.182]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5NClZBp029022 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:47:35 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E0335E1.9010109@apache.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:47:29 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <4E01B627.6000304@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5NClZBp029022 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> >> I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath. > > Yes you do. > > :D > Did it work? and RHEL6.0? From general-return-3925-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 12:50:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 854C14D54 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68436 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 12:50:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68384 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 12:50:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68376 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 12:50:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:50:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33DB1BA96D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:50:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Oe9dBYFKHqF1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:50:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613181BA969 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:50:19 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309438205.08489@qhPTSmp7EBdqQ+vbJb4j1Q Received: from [16.24.224.182] ([16.24.224.182]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5NCo3n7029163 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:50:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E033676.8030205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:49:58 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5NCo3n7029163 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 22/06/2011 21:27, Scott Carey wrote: > "Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed > Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that > option is discouraged." > > I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM > and OS version was the problem seen? A colleague saw it, intermittent JVM crashes. Unless he's updated I can't say the problem has gone away. > > CompressedOops had several issues prior to Jre 6u20, and a few minor ones > were fixed in u21. FWIW, I now exclusively use 64 bit w/ CompressedOops > for all Hadoop and non-Hadoop apps and have seen no issues. It is the > default in 6u24 and 6u25 on a 64 bit JVM. what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? From general-return-3926-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 18:23:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89AC54697 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93432 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 18:23:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93372 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 18:23:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93359 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 18:23:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:23:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:23:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4E0335E1.9010109@apache.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:23:40 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E18CE25-6863-4318-8A95-17896B0B87D1@yahoo-inc.com> <0C4895F3-95E8-45ED-B2B0-C3BF4B5436B1@gbiv.com> <4E0082D9.5090607@apache.org> <4E01B627.6000304@apache.org> <4E0335E1.9010109@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>=20 >> On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>=20 >>> I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs = underneath. >>=20 >> Yes you do. >>=20 >> :D >>=20 >=20 > Did it work? > and RHEL6.0? We've been using ext4 for HDFS and MR spill space (the rest are = ext3) on CentOS 5.5 in some form or another for almost a year now. No = issues to report, other than it isn't ZFS (so we lost some functionality = that we greatly miss). At this point, we're waiting for 6.1 or 6.2 before changing our = Linux version. RH (historically) has too much shift between 0->1->2 = for it to be considered stable until the .2 release. But we might jump = on .1 anyway.= From general-return-3927-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 00:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50E484D49 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71094 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71013 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71005 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dujunping@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:16:19 +0000 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so2530687wyb.35 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:15:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dN5v3//TlGA2vtR5tMCdRTl2KxfS8SOkn2dK10adahM=; b=oGC5AAnfWHiF03RP4dgxsJevtoUTLBJtfMofSYiD0Ci4guQW2gh5qBPIT3HQ6wFG9n YlX0ZvRo65Lk6a1B7SWYq2VlA+ulMkq97y13JJgMcTAryLWejfF+zI4TSt3qj4vPfqQt 92RcIAZHr8bFo9Nzy6pXoAALBmfLfVgisW8no= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=d+Ow0Nh+UqsZJ8ZhLA0ywYuhKsTw6hpm1DiiLtxKLO5N4AF7/ETKm30YkisOPRW/8N Ry6rpjATdohUVygaG0/qrovgDx9ISSm8FKfhlKCVrES5BWVOLN8/erK3TqMNMW4soPIe v5PnSysD5BZh7PdiVUMgxnUsl4FjcDPxzjVcw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.197.96 with SMTP id s74mr2326899wen.21.1308874559552; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.20.147 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:15:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: How to configure a multi-tenancy hadoop cluster? From: =?GB2312?B?v6HGvbbC?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd863c2d7bcd04a66a1b1c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dd863c2d7bcd04a66a1b1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello all, I setup a hadoop cluster (0.20.2 distribution), and start it with one user on master node. When I switch to another user, I even cannot see any processes for hadoop (use jps command) which means I cannot submit job into this cluster user another user account. I see a lot of articles saying that hadoop support multi-tenancy, can anyone tell me how to configure it? Thanks a lot! Best Regards, J.P --0016e6dd863c2d7bcd04a66a1b1c-- From general-return-3928-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 05:09:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4725662E0 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65991 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64925 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:09:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64904 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 05:08:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:08:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:08:51 +0000 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so1742010qyk.14 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.49.133 with SMTP id v5mr2186787qcf.165.1308892110104; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:08:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.7 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:08:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:38:10 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to configure a multi-tenancy hadoop cluster? To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: dujunping@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (-general@, +common-user@ -- Please use general@ only for project wide discussions) User jobs do not need visibility of the java processes to submit jobs. Specifically, are you facing any issues trying to run a job as another user= ? On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:45 AM, =E4=BF=8A=E5=B9=B3=E5=A0=B5 wrote: > Hello all, > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I setup a hadoop cluster (0.20.2 distribution= ), and start it with > one user on master node. When I switch to another user, I even cannot see > any processes for hadoop (use jps command) which means I cannot submit jo= b > into this cluster user another user account. I see a lot of articles sayi= ng > that hadoop support multi-tenancy, can anyone tell me how to configure it= ? > Thanks a lot! > > Best Regards, > > J.P > --=20 Harsh J From general-return-3929-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 07:36:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64CCE6E2C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16806 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 07:36:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16005 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 07:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15830 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 07:36:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:36:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:36:27 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so2280151pve.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.1.170 with SMTP id 10mr1469880pbn.189.1308900965169; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-70-95-55-11.hawaii.res.rr.com [70.95.55.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm1852741pbj.94.2011.06.24.00.36.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:36:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-12--118723366 Subject: [RESULT] Powered by Logo Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:35:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-12--118723366 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ok, I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that = method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it = changed the outcome. With the binding votes from the PMC: First Round=09 2 4 4 4 5 6 6 1 Second Round (Drop 6) 2 5 4 4 5 6 Third Round (Drop 4) 2 8 5 7 =20 So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached = below, show the counted votes. With all of the binding and non-binding votes: First Round=09 1 1 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 4 Second Round(Drop 1) 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 5 Third Round (Drop 6) 2 15 4 24 5 29 Forth Round (Drop 2) 4 35 5 31 -- Owen --Apple-Mail-12--118723366 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-13--118723366 --Apple-Mail-13--118723366 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Ok,
   I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the outcome.

With the binding votes from the PMC:



First Round
2 4
4 4
5 6
6 1
Second Round (Drop 6)
2 5
4 4
5 6
Third Round (Drop 4)
2 8
5 7

 
So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached below, show the counted votes.

With all of the binding and non-binding votes:



First Round
1 1
2 13
4 23
5 27
6 4
Second Round(Drop 1)
2 13
4 23
5 27
6 5
Third Round (Drop 6)
2 15
4 24
5 29
Forth Round (Drop 2)
4 35
5 31


-- Owen

--Apple-Mail-13--118723366 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=Powered-By-All.pdf Content-Type: application/pdf; x-mac-hide-extension=yes; x-unix-mode=0644; name="Powered-By-All.pdf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 JVBERi0xLjMKJcTl8uXrp/Og0MTGCjQgMCBvYmoKPDwgL0xlbmd0aCA1IDAgUiAvRmlsdGVyIC9G bGF0ZURlY29kZSA+PgpzdHJlYW0KeAHVXWtv7Mhx/c5fwW8ZAbnjITlPwDC0dq7j2Lt+7L2w83AQ WCNbiZNda3e010l+fYrsPqc5XV1SUaQSB4YxdzXkYU+zzqlHF5vf1L+qv6l327rZbNftcdPUu02z 7up9s1sf2vrb39e/qb+uv/ejS1OfL/Vm+N/lLKds1s1+tw9/Cf9sjvV2s960m82xOn9V//BjvW2H 7+Wj7eSbQ7uTI3bH9XZ3rD9+VX/vx816Uzf1xz/U/1Svvr4RzLZe/an/bOrVn2/qd5v1tlo9/kf4 V7363U197A/5r3ho3X9u69X3cYCBUROjUhi333yzjnBnXPqr/g9dvfrBTf3P9cef1u8/DrM07Sc3 +2a/3u8P1k9eNTf1xz++Evuw264PjQm9nwF9PO3Xh+5kYu9ejy2mcVqLNRhGsGpnQDdiYYeTPdvb Gdjtfrvenjpz3N0M7EQMIWDTCBtyYvw0WjmsMxj5YMmD9T/9a7RfocfwB7AA9Hg/0EPsGQc8kFG/ Hyy9Wl1wLKn0x+EkIVs4xD65Xl1uH8CY391UwxD+DYzkld6cZMXpm2NSDUlWhp5hUU0iWRl7EZKV oWdoQ5tIVsaeQ4REsjL2DLls9+12ve96/1TEFu/z44EI9YqG++1AKmHGE6jx5U0tMOKZQMTvhkOS 57qf4y7oIbvT9rQ+7DstBB9vxEsfxj7y/r6OhPvlMDjxheD4I/7BX4Rh4wvIBD7/1EPJz8PPwu+m JDwB4f7+8VZ8cCPjTBeECoWDKs7Su0EKBJcDwQXPLk2oXog16jzWoONVM1kNscYETdDYURMAXV2r 9cqvCRoammBh+zVBYcPxWtB+3mpoaIKF7dcbjQ1NsLD9mqCxjyeJczfb+g2wu1ZkRsKzN4BOMnE8 7dbbZpdZoEjZZ70siRKAZvdByrQnp9P/OcIAUD+582soQCppyDXl972WSMQRg/h69ZJeJFUt6YWA SSTi04vJuUnSizilmfJO0AuV9yCG6Axov15oaOqFge3XC4VNvTCg/ZzW0NQLA9vPaY1NvTCw/Tqn sakXBvbk5EWy281mI37+PEqUu+ZwWO+6fW1ZTDP+Db3DtrNwrXlINrrjVlJvyU2T+6pCFv4jhP1w 5xAPem+qxt/0OrNLxIV4SHZR9Zl7Cg14CkOJ8z1iidFZQ74/Ous2qIpUACAvZ4wKSQkiCKBhtA/L pO6FeeqrFcsogroFA/QyilDGnqMIyfzL2JPH/ZL5ly/TLmL+h6PUOJqTw/xhnrnnUzyBiX7dez5x Vg/KR55pvelYYVB/7G3ucB+DIVerJ1g6T4bJv1G1qtNzs5jJG9CTTSfVFZlIW8Oe46litcqCnuOo 6ASNKRlbudjIMyKvHRWdoIG9iAoshf2CChiXaQ+jiturneCha9edhOnKCX4RE3vwFF4H/30PUn6K B4LrP7upu20f9yKXhmzgTPgnnECHmAvA9SWrlbpkdI5S2gY2FQKjg1JcO8dqNck5qiAihctx/rIM ZIJz1NhIrw1ov1JoaIbLBrZfKRR2S+e4PDZzSQN6xpSkXHJ/OMrCTZfdScklfxhjPNgY7JeloMt/ o9ILk/7QnyLLNrA6VoDxB+aEDClhsKw5AyvSQ9wgTk7Xo2fEmCwnWl850eCdQY23cqJxQkfSspgT NaD9dqA9BtOCfdut94d9Nmyxg3BTU20Q4Qnu3AV6hTuHE3BzeK+hiPyDaGhfSEzrGTpbuCAKA5q6 LOTzInWG6rm6ZEpX3rnqkr1zqVeAn5JVKJVIwhmnOaPbIsJpQPutQw2bxfOujC3WgUwQtwdkfYQ1 SKiUFlLDgvP6tK/37XG9b4c1Z6kWbWtZHGxOp2NXvXLZWY9dLnA67nZ1t5MlvNMxzHgrMfdQCf5+ s99sf+BdhdXoB0mim22G3onBBPTN3d1psz/PuEK32/XL5lKkHI9/vGqOGWYgkQQSlIR2y1059Fl5 WD2vWOcfr9710j2q1FO7n9XLyrlEriYwMSL8PNGdatQUsAghihO38sfAetAMJMrQi8QRZeh2FPU+ nxXEUafouko5UyoxcdbHrRircYVpxNVGWi+2b8nVrlnv2uYgtr4Rhp5OgawjOu3u2jlk7da73SaH T1pwON3vXg/fSb/Mru8/MEe/PcwSgsN6vznm8M8qwQO8JuT48p8xXcEXt6LLIrzVSmx2KNdL2jl8 Pkv3+R0xmKMszpjAdxXDsNAejSeH9rNSQyfCB8PMsf3OVWGz0G4MW27Ia3uEuFhvzbZfA/WwWWMw xj2nNsJkysCePN1JBYuFduMy40rjr2QR+n+vR67bbjsJjwphOAItxKMxiJb8CKEXw+q8R+5LaRDY 9+V6tXB/lwcGKqa4lxh9KFTiKi9hyHqftARJ7DxqOuLIfEHFAipTnsZFVMaAXkRlDOw5dEUl04Ce w1ZWMg3syWxNgUpLlTGw56gjVcbAnjzdL6iMcZllKpmyWLjeS/+tqmSy1oKM+Q7kvuAv4DQ4Tp6e wxHVCqcwxyDq3SU/+/xsNhHXBd86vNDTMbf6kip8BvYM5rPCZ0BPtsQRg1jZ6brduh2v9/YzMirs PCFLPP/7oPXprqOSkx9Ra7u46GNu77+LC2K9mxmKKdGu6hXM4OvoXWCRT1PKLCo2SUll8TeP5X+z lgZ2KQb0Se/lPLnRLNVPpXF+fWpb8i80msn0/gJFJlIGPxI/GuTikX/Vz4Yk4V/E+4AbQ7fJfwAq d/XkKWY8hAupwkYE/iOHenF1oeLdw0WgBA/jWs9uL9WQ3bHtOx2kLCILLodjP+UnKfPIv6TO84fK +1CBzsTRYd/F+c8Lan7fo7GxEmFA+12mhmY+YWC37qBfYTOfMKD9HlND09Mb2H6d0tj09Aa2X141 Npp/DSvx1C/l8ql++UI/qhKkkUz0EfhhS5ngsy8fVWcvKAt5+E3USBT16KW5DIIjyX6umQALeguy 47+pTTZ47tWr1M1LDQHcW62pSDhYmL0JLbfqzrBoYED7iaihE8nLw/YLiMJOJC9D+4mooRPJy9h+ ImrsRPIytl+cNDbD+aVu5QvhvHGZZjz3r25MaA5SlryK1mJ33qi/QLyoLEwhikiRF/7yRIXAX4JA VFzTheP+LkrLPQ7kmSEULAR6keLydMSLgUIK83A9BgrjMG9y8JXCvHy2Ypf/Es4/QudxhV8XlDdK DUsGtp9gCpu6YED7JUdDUxcMbD93NTZ1wcAec6o3+ykdr9QFA3uylSRdKC6pxMtkLn7V+q+jtY1J XNMc1sfDuG0xZnF4RJDMjc8EVnx6D9zuHwboUVKbLb5BnsHHCbOAolqxPSO/THq0AGAvXUYqlgg2 1lF+iH6LbyBMMrLd1cMECGDiOFIuMiv0EMOsrh5aHklMceIXCT3K93ScpU6NN0cSUx62X2K0LaKS aAzbLzEaOklMedh+GdDYSWLK2H750thJYsrYk8edJKa4XmFMfXsapY2vDj02e1km7Qo9kSlFAfvk 2cNQqcCqBPgKEcAn5cLujX6SMlFfF0gRTeHkcACapVM5IzZLX/d5hYMhLs8Kw4zYI5+uBWOPCP0m sYeB7RcG7cTppHqFaKSHJ9Wio5P6LJoLE0b+AxaFew7DCknvKNd8YraLQ+G1YD6AQpAJqJgVD0Zz 7UxeHcEu10hbnrIJ7kXdDma2BvQiEayBPceKWKspY3tqNfLTFqjVtCfZYePY7bJATgYQ6rIprQkW Vq34RAg0B6b3Ido9TJJy+Cl/hDp2PlZpQ5NQupFHH7nQ8szZeZGmb+SKKy6kGgb3rCC+/hFKY9om mLLyrzBlC9pvyhoaRRoL22/KChvJmAU9J1JCxGFhT042no84rMt048jmtRFHe9rIcod0NiV/EYsd 3NIAmk7xB5PAMFIPJQZ4h2+lGfgq2WHMwirpI5mQTsoypPvYWf6XEHGo6Vou4gB05rknpCLaDSWC hbucY/sJprATwcrQfoJpaKQi1pT40wWNjVTEwh6TSoLYV1U7FsNOwlCqduAyI+4OC+2df+61biKQ bI9bWTyUjaiSMGRr1oj57kLBINFTPY3wt3hIBQLxSDcK1iOQZOUE4kKluDy4z5b+J3hu7Ig0N0mZ 4ZPLE7mITzagF/HJBrZfMp6xrYNs/nE4pQV7rsT9OgZrtI9PN/Wpr2+FZjZUxGEtufXgv+lnBE+2 85G8Fk6MD8czJMuxcA0OQVniQzpFhiXgrJ2BEjzCte/Gqa8HrmOfBv0hLHhcpn/JCpXcsYbWxinP PYA/VtHYcY3egvZboYam4zKG7bdChU3HZUD7xVND03EZ2Is4LgN7juOi6B86eUZlu82sRNKuZPKh sgNLl1jwOsR74JP38YHY9CgizrlHhRmgCCjNTppwYMX1NiDpq5/l9g19r1KOGz4P8fMYP5GlJXdF olMS1v2xwutZXFTyN+JimOXMtS7iEeINzKH9XNTDTlwsD9vPRYWduFiG9nNRQyculrH9XNTYDCKN 6fZzUWOTi/tjt97IY3oqAGM4RcsNBBpV6uCzfqkYcgHp6CO/xMZ68JH39/IU50AAwDAIuwc1HrJr j55a60OtsSbIMjWvCfYlQSGOh32Vu7SktDmxL85rpnET2Kex4QkN6Ha0NCDKMiWn4GpSa2D72aeG TfYZ0H72aWiyz8D2s09jk30Gtp99GjuxT55dPWzjI6vjB72w3AKbRsxJQwaNaNCBRdUKy8TwXjhQ sYyVFlwDseCjeM5mU3EHZrn5g5ObQatq0jbLasJGtCpO2DK0KkMvQ6sy9iK0KkMvQ6sy9jK0KmOP aJWeS93upbG9fy613ch221vZIHzTnU6ht3i0dfnru4zZvtlK66Y0Zl8/oyyRqayMHg/9Tqjp0WsQ ShawJPuTPi1UDvDFb1ehMbxa/Zy05f4tOJj8BQsvv71BP/lfxwgRgB96hyld47IdhzyImtJNfE8H ehGjLcanMrvD39uY6r7DpfJgmVu3YZyPDxASSBH+W9Vf+ZOm5KUyrhALy0+0NmOYuIu9mMPLu9g/ ozUwhfDg9II12AE4jwxm6MzIelvZb3DXZthiv7/OSxS4iyhEwPzoFWJ9TT8joq3tUyyfBNsykf8/ bNvR7oozuIiDMaBnqGmK2wzsOUbVr87KU0bWjMzxXYzbjGGPnMALjVGKvtKzG/bxt8Y9xzEybusd 0mFT2Jf3/SCo8kTsvTTcy/ylFOTbKObMiCRQawbRWw/fJKL9w00tDTqihtBefIJZioGQ4njRVHXg RaXoIRVOAOETgGZ7ROotDINMEECetM+YykNTYBdnNMtDJ/BOYyNfMqD9vNPQrFYY2H4DVtjMlwxo P+80NHlnYPvlQmOTdwa2n3caO/Gukf28d+N15LhchHwJTBCXdL3hlNjruFwwKqeDTT/raSihB/6b 0VTclq9aRdArThugoAvca9bvOjD0ukUJI2eoCIgX6oN9vDShWXrEODWX/Zr8BMYp7WUXxzZAZ2HI IhvytAa237zUsBPjysP2s0JDJ8aVsf1s1tiJcWVsv8BpbDJO2CbPdcZ9esYVCsmIZOFYvBRSBzgV lBEQUXKrt1hRrFZjLg7vehJiDetvIYDkCWTg00PxlOSd+i3hnn1VRXJcTHlItOAFq4W2npe5NDrM 2ziXb+HjDOgZfijFlga2n3Fa0BFbGtB+xmloMs7A9rNCY5NxBrafzRo7MU42INrvx93Z0cehsgdP 8YfeYckmnOGz7mk1EBLfCyWG/4ZD+zkYScu/3PGfT/IKnFBdIOu44BwIktweTxqfnzOwUsIAgbAY aL/8YbHyYRfmNndMS6xPG9B+BioRHjGwPGw/AxU2fZ4xbD8DNXRiYHnYfpZo7MTAMraf3RqbDGy3 x3XXFLrbPwyMGz2DcO24QLTP42EweOyO8QBXOfZmQ0UPDAMCOXhhPQaXEpJKeplqbCD11C2iZUf6 H9wsstRVnq5FAkkDehFSGdhzLJ8W1JyGzb0ynZE63GfRNPIgKdfuvvq267ORVEYI6owDqcEwGdim ecCXQ4QkARu61fIx3MOUuBUvsGmOOCKdej0q3cGeuwUdL4Il74Y+dvnJ/GlgxVu/E6iNt+stAjMD 2m/BKlJIbsHAbt0LwQqbbsGA9surhqZbMLD93kxj0y0Y2H6Xo7ETqbt8A64YmFGMYcpB50edEny/ IJlknDOy/qd/6bVCtP7uU2yUcHEp9vmF0K9QO1hE8qVlt9+LLNO3RSTfgPYTRjn2EWHKw/Zbh8JO hClD+wmjoRNhyth+nmvsRJgytp+MGpuE2Rz7/cgyIxEnCFdFoYc7AX8g/Mhk4Ic+jykK/o7j8T3Z dXFAh0Bq3ZNMnCL5mGPfnuFRL5ImDITEObyIbGa2CK2KEzaHVWllcCN3RXYv0zcDEQlcO34t5hb3 AnP8RZww6d4a1Wxwlq7dAPcJN/n2zLnGNRAg8wUoAnddWMWUFwRtxpOAqRgapyePAPyqo/wGi6EG tJ9hGprLDwa2X9AUNgXNgG5nBBcUNAPbL5Z62BQ0A9uf4mtsCFpzOpR2pxJF+8lQDB21ZATWDKXO QV7yWsyXaIcEBVIlBoS74CtggYFUOaSTkCycCTLioopx6b0AsxknKvqq5YfCXA7LD37GKccDxgE6 07pFnnGzsP1sVsMG4yxoPys0NBhnYfuFQmODcRa2n3EaOzGu7XfJ2me3UhiHBT+Q5LvolvhgAJ8X xTdP2C0rdfjzYFLqrI5Ou1U8FJfJhQASPoCC6zgMDAtUXGiZvBEX3s/HG/gpC3qG4DPwtrD9JqJF OS4hWNB+y9bQiTXl2faTXWMn1pSx/WzX2GTNcW/sIfVR4irr7fKf96Y7fjGMfmpaeSBuP3l/TydT eBQH7BA2TAvrqvcf677r77VOJk3E1TtnlnAyETpTpmWcjIHtt2mtqKCLAe03Ow1NuhjYfrpobNLF wPYriMZOdGmG/ZCyWylO5j26uSDjzPjOoEL+8ryY24xe5njpe35Ry5Ul8zHFQAxmRPgDLqgW5fID 0ohkmofsVKZk+CxVi4KzgnPC57vhZ06tvC6R8TbH4tTP6hSJbV8WtN+fPWMxh52x/xGjDsTmSH/Z 9of8GTfy6RwOqVIJAgu6sLEUnShUqm5qcPg/T6YlDh9m5y2CFAPaf1Of8ZqHjbEb0EsL77hPP0EW iJuOkgc+cc/B7jvcej4WkB8BaJpAbgGADp+pIwaXKBqICITErC/lftIRA4XAVZZ5TLyJM50J7iKs N6D9BvIM6/c7Ue9joaD5RYz6cd+5aEt1xn38xyHvZ1twapLAqbhvPBNfAIGWgHsCG9IXvYU14fN8 QX5yhz/hetKo2GyQx4y0CMdJLeEkaxE4H3/mln5TLENxkHU4KSUMU/wW0mFA+yMfPWzU4axh+61O YbMqYAzbH/hoaAZsBrY/ztTYDNgMbH8wqLEZsO1OsmtMYYv994jXGE9FGqXmejpoSBsP5T9IPdTT 8qJ2Ull9zkS9lYBMxACsmqW3ar4Sq4rzNUFuNTSCrDLyIpwqQ8+xTeRAZeQ5lklGlaHn6AAJVYae owOJT1tjp5zPYk0ATAjVsSq9jx5OCN7pQzwB/oE7QOMAui+4rWvo0avuAe3u7a1W716VyCyxgNTs ilO4DMfK0DPufCrMGcOewwWyrDzsOQRONCtjL8OzMvYMTeMqbCPRY7/zTRbeSKUBRAusQC9vKqWB JaARHlahrwJbYkoxWtCOPiq5wIyC9QoPqUwBw043Mi2h2iDvggz/wk8gGp2k4eaW6u7F7L5FWhFv XA7t56BKKxIHDWy/MStsBo8GtJ+DGpocNLD9PNHY9HUGtl+WNDad3bYbdrzJbqVw8O9HuRkeSxkS ZVoyvNq3valLBh3YWLGhhSnYp6sHWkDePI6sV3hZM9p8h2fMRm0VPJNbDSJslT0AsloiaUbCg4kG 7+pJm3LoGBBvZmvijGaqtojvM6D9vNPDZtJmYPt5p7AT74KN5TPi552GTrwrY/t5p7ET78rYft5p bPKuOwx73WRzMvJ93NEz8k22dEK1C26Provd7rR6kjR1TAtJJblSdCAqT+FffFvchCr6rGRN6VNK 1uI8Zfo0gU0aG9maAe1nk4YmmwxsP5sUNtlkQPvZpKGTVbayXUA212KTKPlCQhHcwANQyrn7Szgy dfzAR+AMSLkyZT5mdX2tVGRg0S63bFwCn/mlbvHGsNTxgKUFuBGcyt5/8gmNEPjlYfyjnmZ4lRxq qVaHrr8zmVpMYIFSIrYHFYH9HNDAiQOlIbczOuaQSxWHPEfx6U2KyHP0nr6kiOznrJrmlEW1h2GX m8w2hLVqN/n+FVUSqaU8Cuz7cUxW6AIeYO8gEb8BRcIXsrALgwdWcko4N152WJO76scH/SK4vF3E eVlZrcFlbx/JUVGMIVDFTooZvOxWBQcKss5yWuqWJKdVviWL0NWAXoSwBvYSlDWg5xCApDWwF6Gt gT1HbOhs22bYNkcT9+96OkoDAlwgnA0oxpVVkIAUuMA/XZ+K3KzGa1b0ShsJBcxHbtKBv1hXSf4U vAoDxvqZPCG60HpYecaW4VXxZkx42kDLAR2hMexFeFUe9hz7TLwqY8/hLN2hMSVzOEteiQ4/vy3O NTlGQRw8Fi0djEMAnPsnfB+dnrzjERC4BggZthGt/duIjladQau3clflCVuEVgb0Iu7KwJ5j+4gw Deg5jCWtDOxFaGVgL0MraZWV+dHuCk1/jBFjDpdyNpCCD35+6D3cuPUPHoObAihmpUdCmCICFp9P 6UE3hTeuZYRlZg6XbH9znhVncBmelaGX4VkZe47Bkmdl6GV4VsaeIw90X33buObCahGeyY6l5R1v vhiytxQWfjv896gvjWWYX2DlNxwiARiNnZXyjGD16qu4Cy7pgLjvGZBbOMQzLxBIJKPCV1NiP1Wa EkGTPY73B2nHCtOSFacmkEdjoxBoQPvJo6EZ+xnYfvIobBYCDWi/gWtoOikD22/gGpvkMbD9pNfY iP1Op2GvmkIJk8UQBGZPMGta7hkrv6BGzLPS84HwKvRjqdiB0gKsnoeOH5MKjke1t8Lv5IRbqHaI Sck89wTq6NwmUseC9pu3hgZ1LGy/DSpsUMeC9lNHQ4M6FrZfTTQ2qGNh+6mjsUmdbb9Jzy5/mE7q iCzqI86KjKn67XjCsmv2Tao3fJ4HeuAWmROIkzbp1YUIWT3u95oHS+ifSNxxbNfHlaOMjgfj7DfK oU7l2VuEYwb0IhwzsOcYVIztrBmZQ19yzBj2IhwzsOdoAzh2PPYbxcibGtT7hVBgAJFC7TrtZgja INfCcfBmcDc4jvRiLkauoizOpvcc4/mmXfFh0vkuznPas4u159lFpU4M/4yZW4JfFvQS/LKwF+CX BT2HA+CXhT2HA/BhFvYcXSC/OtliZ38q1Cju+IgivVmItlLxWj/+fncW0lxtW093IvY/9Dwh3Lv0 pIlvHkcYh+9eerKo+NK7JZ4nlJe5D9PxBjmTBe0njQri2QJoYftJo7C5Wno4Dhv/NNmUSJTjeSsN VBcq+1HMQ1pYU5sDDoCkjt97ENcmg90AgTodco9kjUxP3JB/AVEQZjfzb0uotAXtNzjtXJBpWNh+ g1PYyDQs6CVU2sKeo6RQaQt7jgeASh/aYd+gLrMS4SAXNsGfILOF1jfES4pHyMOvEbj2X62ej26E nc7oJsRByxS3MCOZKk3gjVI89PdY0H7eaGjyJt7IfNh+41bY5I0B7aekhkZ0Y02J37Y1NnljjNvP SY0N3uwPw243heLW+yEPF8NF57RskwkC5JkB32QawhNZsmQeDVcTWIfHLtIyvl07DmcKT7n+qa4/ kXehVPbGWTtmNFOiCbxTwg/eWdB+3mlo8M7C9vNOYYN3FrSfdxoavLOw/bzT2OCdhe3nncYm7/pM 93B85j07cDpwV4j8SQK4KaTvSBHAND4YCNYiHAQSDgQQ40a+2BtH4AxeG3FhKrGR8Exn3ppn5Rmc wzNG9Dt5O9iu2xRqKj+7qbtt786ha0EK06NflELcDnxyUvGHR0Bk81/1T4ulnQJGu6PhTHzakH8B 98eYw9UcsYorBBZ0+/o+YCaKFvYcHQTpd/K+v+ZYiFFpVbizsCq0lycjSJ41HJPK4h9iWVyEo7ee T/Ix1LgD/WXxFIoSzQvXyswvhLUR4XjsewbB5ACQOK/L6rC7tKD8rC6IQxZ4tDMtE/fGSc7jR7/Z qWAJ7tdA9ludRob3NaD9Rqeg4XwN5J2bKhoZvteA9rtHDQ3Xa0D7vbqGBgm3u2EPokK1pmfhqX/o sN+JJe32xNYgmjIYIycMBvzZTbWTEz4OTzfK+b9AqwQOpGeFqT/e41/glpByKP6FTZ/BTX3t2wd8 h88Helw4FGDjNRQcOI/EVd9o5QpznMfAfhKqyAkktKD9pqGhwUIL208WhQ0aWtB+hmto8NDC9guT xgYRLWw/yTU2mbiRddXjoeAP85A2ui7dNAGC4QSEurR4HEAG3t2db+X/X8cXPoAIX0f6AQAUAqWm +Cb1i7nitC3/4iViIgt6hoExJrKwl+CFMSNzbJe8MLDn2C55YWCPZOhX/wMJYvx/CmVuZHN0cmVh bQplbmRvYmoKNSAwIG9iago3ODkzCmVuZG9iagoyIDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UeXBlIC9QYWdlIC9QYXJl bnQgMyAwIFIgL1Jlc291cmNlcyA2IDAgUiAvQ29udGVudHMgNCAwIFIgL01lZGlhQm94IFswIDAg NjEyIDc5Ml0KPj4KZW5kb2JqCjYgMCBvYmoKPDwgL1Byb2NTZXQgWyAvUERGIC9UZXh0IF0gL0Nv bG9yU3BhY2UgPDwgL0NzMSA3IDAgUiA+PiAvRm9udCA8PCAvRjEuMCA4IDAgUgovRjMuMSAxMSAw IFIgL0YyLjIgMTAgMCBSID4+ID4+CmVuZG9iagoxMyAwIG9iago8PCAvTGVuZ3RoIDE0IDAgUiAv TiAzIC9BbHRlcm5hdGUgL0RldmljZVJHQiAvRmlsdGVyIC9GbGF0ZURlY29kZSA+PgpzdHJlYW0K eAGdlndUU9kWh8+9N73QEiIgJfQaegkg0jtIFQRRiUmAUAKGhCZ2RAVGFBEpVmRUwAFHhyJjRRQL g4Ji1wnyEFDGwVFEReXdjGsJ7601896a/cdZ39nnt9fZZ+9917oAUPyCBMJ0WAGANKFYFO7rwVwS E8vE9wIYEAEOWAHA4WZmBEf4RALU/L09mZmoSMaz9u4ugGS72yy/UCZz1v9/kSI3QyQGAApF1TY8 fiYX5QKUU7PFGTL/BMr0lSkyhjEyFqEJoqwi48SvbPan5iu7yZiXJuShGlnOGbw0noy7UN6aJeGj jAShXJgl4GejfAdlvVRJmgDl9yjT0/icTAAwFJlfzOcmoWyJMkUUGe6J8gIACJTEObxyDov5OWie AHimZ+SKBIlJYqYR15hp5ejIZvrxs1P5YjErlMNN4Yh4TM/0tAyOMBeAr2+WRQElWW2ZaJHtrRzt 7VnW5mj5v9nfHn5T/T3IevtV8Sbsz55BjJ5Z32zsrC+9FgD2JFqbHbO+lVUAtG0GQOXhrE/vIADy BQC03pzzHoZsXpLE4gwnC4vs7GxzAZ9rLivoN/ufgm/Kv4Y595nL7vtWO6YXP4EjSRUzZUXlpqem S0TMzAwOl89k/fcQ/+PAOWnNycMsnJ/AF/GF6FVR6JQJhIlou4U8gViQLmQKhH/V4X8YNicHGX6d axRodV8AfYU5ULhJB8hvPQBDIwMkbj96An3rWxAxCsi+vGitka9zjzJ6/uf6Hwtcim7hTEEiU+b2 DI9kciWiLBmj34RswQISkAd0oAo0gS4wAixgDRyAM3AD3iAAhIBIEAOWAy5IAmlABLJBPtgACkEx 2AF2g2pwANSBetAEToI2cAZcBFfADXALDIBHQAqGwUswAd6BaQiC8BAVokGqkBakD5lC1hAbWgh5 Q0FQOBQDxUOJkBCSQPnQJqgYKoOqoUNQPfQjdBq6CF2D+qAH0CA0Bv0BfYQRmALTYQ3YALaA2bA7 HAhHwsvgRHgVnAcXwNvhSrgWPg63whfhG/AALIVfwpMIQMgIA9FGWAgb8URCkFgkAREha5EipAKp RZqQDqQbuY1IkXHkAwaHoWGYGBbGGeOHWYzhYlZh1mJKMNWYY5hWTBfmNmYQM4H5gqVi1bGmWCes P3YJNhGbjS3EVmCPYFuwl7ED2GHsOxwOx8AZ4hxwfrgYXDJuNa4Etw/XjLuA68MN4SbxeLwq3hTv gg/Bc/BifCG+Cn8cfx7fjx/GvyeQCVoEa4IPIZYgJGwkVBAaCOcI/YQRwjRRgahPdCKGEHnEXGIp sY7YQbxJHCZOkxRJhiQXUiQpmbSBVElqIl0mPSa9IZPJOmRHchhZQF5PriSfIF8lD5I/UJQoJhRP ShxFQtlOOUq5QHlAeUOlUg2obtRYqpi6nVpPvUR9Sn0vR5Mzl/OX48mtk6uRa5Xrl3slT5TXl3eX Xy6fJ18hf0r+pvy4AlHBQMFTgaOwVqFG4bTCPYVJRZqilWKIYppiiWKD4jXFUSW8koGStxJPqUDp sNIlpSEaQtOledK4tE20Otpl2jAdRzek+9OT6cX0H+i99AllJWVb5SjlHOUa5bPKUgbCMGD4M1IZ pYyTjLuMj/M05rnP48/bNq9pXv+8KZX5Km4qfJUilWaVAZWPqkxVb9UU1Z2qbapP1DBqJmphatlq +9Uuq43Pp893ns+dXzT/5PyH6rC6iXq4+mr1w+o96pMamhq+GhkaVRqXNMY1GZpumsma5ZrnNMe0 aFoLtQRa5VrntV4wlZnuzFRmJbOLOaGtru2nLdE+pN2rPa1jqLNYZ6NOs84TXZIuWzdBt1y3U3dC T0svWC9fr1HvoT5Rn62fpL9Hv1t/ysDQINpgi0GbwaihiqG/YZ5ho+FjI6qRq9Eqo1qjO8Y4Y7Zx ivE+41smsImdSZJJjclNU9jU3lRgus+0zwxr5mgmNKs1u8eisNxZWaxG1qA5wzzIfKN5m/krCz2L WIudFt0WXyztLFMt6ywfWSlZBVhttOqw+sPaxJprXWN9x4Zq42Ozzqbd5rWtqS3fdr/tfTuaXbDd FrtOu8/2DvYi+yb7MQc9h3iHvQ732HR2KLuEfdUR6+jhuM7xjOMHJ3snsdNJp9+dWc4pzg3OowsM F/AX1C0YctFx4bgccpEuZC6MX3hwodRV25XjWuv6zE3Xjed2xG3E3dg92f24+ysPSw+RR4vHlKeT 5xrPC16Il69XkVevt5L3Yu9q76c+Oj6JPo0+E752vqt9L/hh/QL9dvrd89fw5/rX+08EOASsCegK pARGBFYHPgsyCRIFdQTDwQHBu4IfL9JfJFzUFgJC/EN2hTwJNQxdFfpzGC4sNKwm7Hm4VXh+eHcE LWJFREPEu0iPyNLIR4uNFksWd0bJR8VF1UdNRXtFl0VLl1gsWbPkRoxajCCmPRYfGxV7JHZyqffS 3UuH4+ziCuPuLjNclrPs2nK15anLz66QX8FZcSoeGx8d3xD/iRPCqeVMrvRfuXflBNeTu4f7kufG K+eN8V34ZfyRBJeEsoTRRJfEXYljSa5JFUnjAk9BteB1sl/ygeSplJCUoykzqdGpzWmEtPi000Il YYqwK10zPSe9L8M0ozBDuspp1e5VE6JA0ZFMKHNZZruYjv5M9UiMJJslg1kLs2qy3mdHZZ/KUcwR 5vTkmuRuyx3J88n7fjVmNXd1Z752/ob8wTXuaw6thdauXNu5Tnddwbrh9b7rj20gbUjZ8MtGy41l G99uit7UUaBRsL5gaLPv5sZCuUJR4b0tzlsObMVsFWzt3WazrWrblyJe0fViy+KK4k8l3JLr31l9 V/ndzPaE7b2l9qX7d+B2CHfc3em681iZYlle2dCu4F2t5czyovK3u1fsvlZhW3FgD2mPZI+0Mqiy vUqvakfVp+qk6oEaj5rmvep7t+2d2sfb17/fbX/TAY0DxQc+HhQcvH/I91BrrUFtxWHc4azDz+ui 6rq/Z39ff0TtSPGRz0eFR6XHwo911TvU1zeoN5Q2wo2SxrHjccdv/eD1Q3sTq+lQM6O5+AQ4ITnx 4sf4H++eDDzZeYp9qukn/Z/2ttBailqh1tzWibakNml7THvf6YDTnR3OHS0/m/989Iz2mZqzymdL z5HOFZybOZ93fvJCxoXxi4kXhzpXdD66tOTSna6wrt7LgZevXvG5cqnbvfv8VZerZ645XTt9nX29 7Yb9jdYeu56WX+x+aem172296XCz/ZbjrY6+BX3n+l37L972un3ljv+dGwOLBvruLr57/17cPel9 3v3RB6kPXj/Mejj9aP1j7OOiJwpPKp6qP6391fjXZqm99Oyg12DPs4hnj4a4Qy//lfmvT8MFz6nP K0a0RupHrUfPjPmM3Xqx9MXwy4yX0+OFvyn+tveV0auffnf7vWdiycTwa9HrmT9K3qi+OfrW9m3n ZOjk03dp76anit6rvj/2gf2h+2P0x5Hp7E/4T5WfjT93fAn88ngmbWbm3/eE8/sKZW5kc3RyZWFt CmVuZG9iagoxNCAwIG9iagoyNjEyCmVuZG9iago3IDAgb2JqClsgL0lDQ0Jhc2VkIDEzIDAgUiBd CmVuZG9iagozIDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UeXBlIC9QYWdlcyAvTWVkaWFCb3ggWzAgMCA2MTIgNzkyXSAv Q291bnQgMSAvS2lkcyBbIDIgMCBSIF0gPj4KZW5kb2JqCjE1IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UeXBlIC9DYXRh bG9nIC9QYWdlcyAzIDAgUiA+PgplbmRvYmoKMTYgMCBvYmoKPDwgL0xlbmd0aCAxNyAwIFIgL0xl bmd0aDEgMjE4NzIgL0ZpbHRlciAvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUgPj4Kc3RyZWFtCngBrbwJYFTV2Td+zt3m zr5kZpJMlpnJZJ+ECVkJBOaSBRICJiyBBIhJgLBEkACBstVQFUFURG1darVura1tNQIiaFopWkR9 baVa29pq1apVK2ottb6QmXy/c+4korXv1//7/Se59z7nruc859mf596BjZt7iYXsIiLRlq/r6Sf8 Z6zH5pfLtwwE9La0gBB668r+Vev0tvwBIcLkVWu3rdTbpvsIaRpZ3duzQm+TEWwrV2OH3qbl2Gav XjewVW+r+bhf+tr1yxPHTW7sP7CuZ2vi+eSPaAcu7VnXq5/f1sra/es3DejtBXdhO9S/sTdxPm1H f9gzL/jZ8Ag0Z5JVxEAuITIRiINEyEKcaaKnMF7Kj8vC9QfJj1/ustf8g6Sp/PoHLqsvYMCJJ3/0 7og5dpP5JpXdyYg76D+0VHN8HiGWohHzqMF8E79T4iDfzDxGFowe1zIPFpRWOg4GDmoHWw/2H9x1 8K6DQwdfOPj6QdPxgx8fFI7ilP5HklMq/fXUvtC/UGhp62oT1i+g313w0AJh7vxkad58rzR/nkea 1TRPmtFUJc1sKpUasTRVVEs10VJpanSqNC0alOqiGVJtdJ40HYuGJVpRKpWWrZDKKsqlivIFUnlF pvRC+evlH5eLR0c/PHQ4p7Hy6Ojrhw47Qth+qFkPG+2Vh32N0pZDVx1Ctz4+dIifcU4bPWTMrjzk bpSu3psk9a/t3yrYv/OnOwXtDm9qpfYdb1qldksyoJuT0yqv2p3kt19p323fb7/efsB/pX+///rI /l27d+29/oYDuw/sObDXrl1udFTaN/o3CtoGo6XSvo4GTtHA0zR68qOTQuAX2i8EsoySZY5lgtZz V49gX0KL3U6pyJ0jhd3VUqE7SSpweyS/O1MKBuqkgLtGesbXIPnSZkppvhrJ5y6VPDgvCd11uX2S E0u/m2ru6XWVdluhnyjU+mSz33Ki2W863uw3YpGHm/3ST5v94rFmv/BYs58eafaTR5v9T54o9B9/ otD/U23hcND/2LGg/9EjQf+JJ5+yPnH859bhn/7Mcuyxxy1HHj1qcQzvGha0Y7uOCfYj0SMtRwaP SPYjEYDrAT5x5FdHRo+oJmOVZLEKsiSIgkCJ0CrTo3SUDrmaSfOC2qEkiu382oeNpeHmoRXzandf d13G0M3N89qHdmV0HFVxTvsQHaL7O4bU5vkJkITZb9PApk0c+NJqSGwYUhpW9wwpofpNrGFjDVuo HsCQncH2UH2YDrkbVg+5Af3LTTaN/XBIP6g/iMNk85cex5usLwPoUTisZCpu+WP5tLRT6hRfBdeR 0b+MvhHfGl8R7xC/SfzgkJvJA+QYOUl+Oc40w+QEh7eQg+Q4eW58PwO+Qb5Jvk/+i7xCPhrffyu5 k/yIDI23GXCAsL33kR+SB8kh8hh5Evv2khuw93vkxxecuZ7sIdeT28ld5EWakdj/pOCmeg/eIxbh NN1E9xMfKSL1ZCnZRC4jV6Ffp+hs7JuKfa3Yu5FsJTdi7zFy6oJ7j4FTIWk6SR+5lDyMM37Odxfi 2gVkBfayffpvA9lOriZ3k/vJ42Q94D3o77fHbnLB9htCUAiSAfI2rnyWfks4iRHdT3YrbmIiRD7N sCp1ctyS0TcIia8Y/Qch4jLhrHCPcAN5SOgjszVP24KqytLIhOKi3By/O8nltFpAk0WBITGnIdQQ 6lm9L9CwOrAvVN9dX1wE+muoTwsGO4qLAthdHxii3YGGoRlbVqfsa2AnDLnCQ0JOA1v6hrRrugGE 6oPBII4kfX4EMu7aCw4F1gxpPUPkmsDDRcf3XXvUQZZ1hy0rQit6lrYPiT141sMEnVkNiseGLd2r A0MSbsxXadiT6CI7trob61A9rvrK/dhtrGvfEzyeNuTCtmHIGR6aiTvN3P5WmrivIWVNgDX37dsT GLprbvuFR4PsnI6OjpQvoGFGaEb3vn0zQoEZ+7r39Rwd3bUsFHCE9j3c3Lyvv6E7MERawZzY/9g1 aUMzru0YcnSvppOBPTaOGfPao2lBJ7oaDLLxXnNUI8vQGNo1t11vB8iytINEi4Q7hoRuduT42BFP Gzuya+zI+OXdIY7runYxTcCNm+eHmucubg807OtOzFtizyR9Fh8WSO3DIbp37sMa3Tt/cfsxMGZg 74L2gwIV6rprOxgahboF7RdehSsZBUDfQcUJL0B35pL7xHvII1huEt4jN2F7G7Yx2Uu9spfcjeV+ LHOwPI7laizfxrIdywblWhJXrqUWaNkheSvxyTvJKflmskkpxNZOTkm3kVNKOdoiOSVeTK4W7yVF 8jXkeWkA+3+Gc0awnU02SS8CPoBlK7lK+hDUj3sZ3iNL5R2kXvqAKNheJntHR6RfktXSCDkmhcka bNdKT5E+jKGewbKDHBNKwRc/Hz0hDZOfA37ccIocY/ulP5A+fh3OE/v49ZeKeWQajj2Mc6diHAux rWGwVA4uZ5YGsxBgEBAF0gt4JUsSe9he9hNgcUgcknGOgUMqbAoTMeMqK7ERO5OU+DmxuLAkETfx EC9JJikkFXInjaSTDJIJHg+QIMkiIZyTTXJILrZ5JJ8UkEISBqz/irApJhNg8ZSQiaSUlJFyUkEq SRWZRKrJZDKF1EAaTSNRopHppJbUQao1kBmJq/14yiRyLXmPJtGJdA59UJgnKuI3paB0QorJv1XW K4eVc4Y/qZ3GKuPDpjrTvWaD+UeWMssOy++s663HbDvsefanHWuc6c5/uupddyXlJt3vLnSvc1/h 2e2t976YvDclK+XHqft9c3wH0xrS/pielzE7U8580D8QKA78OHhPVl7W70MVoV9lX5w9nB0n0JkE KFMg0LBxP6oIEmFL5PlXn+eriSVBZ9CZgxXFWed2yeQ82xIAbG7uE0/TyyEpReLRTIIgUrtMSZEY OdNJomWRiSVUDIn08vDesOKO/VSowxWPxFeIdlzhIQu1OiM1GlJpqiFfzJdbaKPYKLcYumiXYT1d bxikW4WtyqDBZaDUsl2iagmbd7sF6r7NbjEasfZLe72Os2fC4bJIZw2eGMUDO2koV3A6XFVlHkUx KILH7Ur2epNF+9sPP/XUw2/PvSla09w0rebbc+IrnqOv02L8vf6cqemJwR3x3933o/hbu3Y83cBG dlN8hXCG97NPq1ZEJckjepJyaa6Ym5TrmUk1UUua6WkVW5O6xe6kbWSL0C/2J21xe1xUsmwm1BWV qCSZj46ePcw6zADNzjpt9hOL3S60kRuTHZ+Gv9x3h2AIVVRWVlW6KsqFvNzcvIoyr0s4g47PuX3K tKZZU6M3zcVAhJr4i/HAc6aGp3fsouk/uo/m7xh8osn0XDzAe75fiEL7iqRCy/XRQhoWKki10EAa 8dQOYQVU3S9ECyZrIbhGEnyCIEQ6yyLEcbaUzVinkYaShGj8nRsfpBmxDcL1DBu3CRNFo/AO7hnQ 3LTWDsFml1tIi9xFumSQghDBFJBI5xncIFgRFI2xA0K/MPERdm0Mqw94fwJHhIVUJcX06Oi7molh IUKjVKCRzvAZEsW1wZCzjH7w0Uc4m1Ivelcjvwzu3atVyDMUxSLaxEaq2p1+pyALfju12y02i8Ui tNmsFovSZgsIUXG92C+KosXhENpgkL+umdljRC9DPdpntQyzGVAmu0pUrJga0WG1KlizO4iRMfur swxTU10a6YyUgbBipaBm1j+MzRmsKMUEVVaVOYNSzcgrtDL+bPRAzoQK6XZacqv4zl6PO3XO9HMn MPK7MYIb5I8hVd7Q5rb6u/2CLCpOr+hxZjunyJOsFbZoRjSz2t8sN1obbC0ZLZlN/i6xU+qUlxgX OrtSL07rTO/K6MrsE1covc5lnvWZ/cKAc9A3mD6YmYPRvHuYdRpexbtalEHE7rAXq5H0ErtmV+wa GyPWGJ3dbp6VJAj+WVT1C2rQyynQy5nIKzGEeBlqUtkFXi+7k9cbuDPLnuXPEoDI24KOT4EJtuLo OeOq5ig5U4Z258QSrGgnUMPotrKiPDeUpXAqLmNOA3iQ/welG0Yca15ccnz/bVcveanXNPPM+rep FC7MW9N8yVvLxeDpxYc7HvvD4MAVWu2vQ5Nf/WnbTbXTtjat+cUC4PH+0TekncDjVHJU2282yxGf 2RMpMOdGCmpqzBXuiVnlkVnmBnddVl1kIe2QO8xtkT7zykhfzVbzlshAxY4aX/nk+snClMnALy12 FgvFxQWz/MaJgt3qtwpWq3OW0RQKVnFSqpIYUVQpDAtVmRO8QXFC5mQ4GaKPkwzOAZncFbVH/VHB 8u1pjnc6He+Ew87kaseZSIThh1EymCHqqmabSKy6GijqpF6vjotQFmdqbxknImALXB4KVaCZgMeR 54XcYtd4vF7JVjJtVl3zc9t2fjzH3vbOJdH9RROKy4qLd81aPOPWRyYUhJdN63q5i+F03ffrGmc9 9LWSncLz4ctXrXwgOqNuSuj0pFmFBUV9c1vXZPqTvz+4vXKuz+eun3Y6NCW/qGTvkp3HUmxqGfTo HNDrIVi8JmjN17WgZHVbs63l1nprv1WxpLCRW6yNmE6LYjBam6jMvGwQjdImy6JBFNWoqcUkgK/9 dsFgkbjsA0UB+LsGPlXapIDJaFVaFAoB8JZmZoRHTQytaJ87zPAO4EOtlJ1LqV3xK1FI3lzGy4rA +FhJYXysWNiVmCFcqfBuKQm+hRhjFNrpqi7j/FvdCakUxVREwjWxUld1NcTTHkdMOh5mesIZAi/T MmdZ0EmlQ68ej1UJp4++Gl8ee4LeG++k974jNo5sFO6KdTMp9jhocDdwU0hu0aaaVJ8aVqeqFc6p 3ma13rlYXVDQp25XLRkZviZ7jj9HyxFzgrNylEzBbvIDJybbLMUUyAq0ZNCMo6MfaBPYCDLAaljb 2MAzuPzJcAdJIMNI+AHy3SJ7kb9IMN4e1qnMWc2IjA/wTORzKot0xpjg7qSc176SvkBTzqAn6Kys LCtlZCXtnl3b+PQV29+8yDbvj30zd5cXFVdEyr+1tP3eKeKu2PTw4uC2I7Nb2+nvV/9s+ozmsuwX y5vyS8NbW+b0BXL9KRZh9KH4gCQVlFc9CKq5Gpi5Xz4Du6mKfEubpFi91uqcsollVU05tRPrqrro QmtroDXYG9w80eYTC5oykpKSZ2WIdqGiSTT5iiKuUJC4jAQzf5grRiaKOG0QPsM48IFmZzgi36m2 V/urhUjQiHOOsJONt05iWpTzILiQ4QezDNxgzoGVCEQVxwxhaMkVKspdVZXZDAeeENguixjGMGLQ GRGIUhSPm+EIHCndH//N7y893LCws62znXqPTWktMKVvmPLbUeJZcO8lXTfMbu94rio6oX9q241z BGF69YRLojd8n/75z/E36uvmU9fPT9LSr20YNFmfsKfF//52WUWoYupj13VuLw648wu9Bf47H60o KngYtAWvVPoWaEshLVqpkZqEbNpIm4V2YRvYCgZwAMoaOlacJYuCalf96g5BFIkgSHZcTCSme0Hi rmpG6zFnNdPiexxn9hwHkdMQ08fSt2IXvyw8PzIknpc+OW+Tsx6CJt8++pr0HfnvsIDzSRVVj5Fc GCtWIDWHcS4DsseA0BiQBUDbwo4Vh8s9ZVnleeVl9Z7pWfV5DWWtniWpi9MW+xdkdYU7iromLihb UNWtLrMtcy1L7Q51522xbXHtKLrKlaEIP8z9fkTI9Zoikpgx0yFUNIIQAiSJJiWRiMlaECTe3ECC Ce7Q5zwQtLJHc21utZYGlVsw8UwBYe7fwsRj5rFylkU2MPkbPeNKru6Ex6VldhRdXSQUFJWKFZGC SCV88YWhFaHbchVfICTmZjjZeXzVATphrBWmbhBLdkV5ZVVFbm5FOaiFazFIYZGrNp06kisrkzjJ 5HF6YcTynfiLb30Sf+PAFVs3Ufdv/kRNl22/9ptnvrfrsrvnzsu5pnb5bP/cLZH+zsXrHrv+xofo d38+Ss49ufOZKYp268YfvP7y93qfrFJqhoSWSwa3rmxcU+CanFS7P7Zp6fpJ3tysiT/o2zN0M3ht w+ifpevljzivXalVq1KqVCDV5NSEKybMzpkdrpvQLnUld6bMS+unO3LszozSJndBk1vJSEigCqcR zGb0gafOaiHObZA74Kw7dSwXBX0OJmF9Etvru5kxV4K7OG8x1gJbMd02zlqCQZE+FzquKkXhvAbU ES5sXOOsNc5XVZWV0vUdi5fEPzxWvjTblNE3/dXz7s77epZ+q7m9gxb9bu3Rhralz2qTImujB+6v 1IrX1l501wwqirVPxk/0b9xptoChqPG9SSXZ5VOHr3iLZtbVzY+fv+/24fLivMP3dm0t9nsK8z0F YI44/OVd0nPgrK7Dm2RahIG/qeWaUqrETLbyw4kTRMZFmkpLVE0VJPgvRKOt3CotY8Kkk9m1ZZ2Q uxNLECTUzLK0QBREhRkm0CX4l4930M4cWkE9lMq7zl8mXT6yUdw/R6A7BXo4vjm+GfqDWtCT/bwn PYd3irQImu5NLR+dkFlPZD+NUEG2U0rHeiKynkRoCdWoCAv5q/siSgtkWREW0C/0haIv+Jf3n79M 3D+yUbpcuCg2epheQ685HBsFFQ2NZhouAhXVkhbysnYPdKtklk1Ge5ot3R61a17BL6XL/jR/ujvL neeP+qfnCEVSkRxJi6RnZwXyItHI9JlafePCxgyTLOd1NF1q7LWu8a0O9uatjK6cPuDdkdafN1A9 MMXukp2qa+Y8m1vzpFW5JWnOfLW4uHCuTZ06MXPuxKmCHe6X7KxzFbtnuaJmarbPDcwVUgrc5io7 CZBBCCmSXVB1SStndci46jNQ6GciZbFS2KPwMLm0hxSIYHk+jDVO4aoQylAwBMGboEUIfUaIFVD0 zDyFW5UdypLGXEOJGWJwFcHzFygIKdnrok6mIpg2wCmGi+Y2xxvTZu1t/8Ezn/6oqX/6d/9eGF7S 3h4f+d5d8X92da9b3bWcmu5Y+OiCnh90PBY/sXHTrqsGBui0R56i5X19G2LXR1dUf+PGgR11Vwm3 XBMfuWSgRou/9WdqCwZLRo40v9FxH7V0d68aWLYs/tG3vxf/qKd3lTdlv8c+uHETrX3yGI1u3nzV zv7++C/imqBkpB7+/r33T2ORDx9iNBdDcxhgsz11SDMym+wz7hUoY4CBi2xmUs1SGgyC0WhShT2g MzcuMprEPfBT3aChncomgyCWmzRmbZk0pm9LTJqp3ySajCZFpNtlKqt2C4XpJ8oWhEeqQT6LEXAd wH3IpRYcMslhuVKeI7fJvfIO2SCvMMNugdsA7QQpS6KdNVFMD6Qs8xI7wTidx48f1zcqdBVkL+kM hsSgCJ2VBFa6+MUbYztvfEbIpOrO+Pn4OfrdeI98emSr8IdYDkgDsWE88DTxoDNl1Kq5ZIvHkmdp ExZ6BlMVl7OoPJMZqG4m5jIzDRnlqlhcblC9HleRnesSZoPZA0zSof2Jls7GbM9l3iDby7wmQ46H cFcScuOdMeuEeV0QmbiEm6wA3gIA74v5Ydx7Ihsq7BVahZBZ5DbYGD4xByOH2eMAvKIrMYPKBC3a H/LbAXif3w7A3/jtGHCEdcOwtpyJYf0XKwVCdRC2jW72QhrrOg/tM9zGHbMF4axyey/hRtCEt4G9 zFXTFViIncSacnjBzAXP3B77mB67955Z82atXXzLg/FD2fmRq5Z/QEnnpZFI3mDlzJKrl8Wfocrl 36+YVE6fXf9AVe0k+XRKbnjPxX3fKlb9zwlS5azkNGt8XlJmZlfs24v7clLtsZfTsvOQwKRk0+jb 8gzkOAvJem2hTK1Gxe2laUa3J8dT6alzL1HbTe22JY4l+d1ij7tf2GLvdyd5vb5yl1BYmFuumBDr hFFMmV0cKYoWrS+SAx6Lm2HWks7waVkd1lUWsFTDTWTmjDFyy+Fu6Be5fMwM/ILRV1Umz6jqaJx6 /cJ74v9c1r129bIuar1v60c32nd8sm/DIzMb5rTVzXh89fXn1tnWphQmJ6Ut6emiOSeO0qwVPSsn N/111cVNc5rfvvmON2fOmrlsGXiU0elB0KkNMcZhLVTtanKtEVZbJS8IMhkEuYVQu4eYGJ0QhQ0F hPTmGLGdPcyGhT3vj1Ed/HRObQN+uz/i1xBVkJL//yGzzDHK4jp/jMrAuLCnGAqZTIWgZPTC5GNC ryNko5PPwYdvWnn++fheOvAKpR23PvCr7dvaT+577LHrf9Oxfr3wl+fiR5ZEQSvRqq74Uy8/9HFD ad75KwqrZ77L6AI4ku4AjszkwKPGCqI4FAEC7LiWzZhXUahcIYimCqpKREUAaZPVbqWK0U05c0GT 6swFIMFclDMXcyY51gDozAXgPc5cDODMRddaPh81Z66aTkY4sCDBTRt4zIe7Tsx9Ckp3jITF34z8 TbSzRT49FF89FPttov+D6L+R3H4QfWVd97CuC4KBVqiiQSVii5kZ7UdHX9J8fP5WmO1mqHzKWFz+ X03g62Ny4oOEnDBdMJQwBMXZMFeT+ljYFGIIGAbcXmkwZhf2xLadFB+Vg/GlQ7EydJ7z55/le8Cf 2eRZbYqBGhXFlqEk2YK2ClsTnW6ba+tVes3LbQO2gXR7VoUWoqGQRXQ4ksstQka5aNpipFmOLKMj eHQ0riUxyg2uJRKnbEeCsj8do+y3/oWyWQiAi9HzWohhhWzOtedquYLPY3Sxq42cxY0WdpZxdQ4f LMz/Mdl4Jgz1H2F2AWavLOJEg8cjwfowULl2dxBGusz3Y1GXLOJkOyqrEAYIyvdsj/9pz4Px11au 6qd307WD1Hiby7+luuGh9efir8IMU7qfaIxvEOZfOml+d3cPDT1Je+kdU5v+mnKRz18QfyL+YfxP 8SdyM+m6B3V6kKdwen7zoFihMnrwcnNbdaiCqsom+HWyahTc8GqOY9icxc8d5piCbuK6ArTyjq4r CCdnJgS0bH6ui2sgOMVAUhJH1VawhGZttYqq6IYN8Gt+KwA6ZwBIcAYeillBW2cIADqLcIDdjwGc nOR/4YwxHRSOlZJoTbQGCN7AdDmitoyoEA91lslTTsZST54U/nJS+H0sTz4dOyo0Ah9Xw1j5DcdH rxYySqWKaBJLqWpdZ1LNi01uURYWJ2K2PLaD2OZrnE4A6HQCIM55GcCHRxgSxHXjnHu21BHD8g6P SsZKGaEHYe6FKoIedEv4Tezwk08Ks5988lbp7ltvPd+F/hSN/lV4H/3xkA2au4/upIKrzCMaDOZy 0ZiU5HID12+Ozca5MYr9cIxidZThnFeYLMbcufhMCHwmvpZsT6ZKr5fFbMZJE+F17jgBW0w3f+4v McVbwehPeP+jZ0ruqjQXbI0uXedLs8d/IVB6xVMvOS3HbJmFefkDs8XeO9Hz56FNNnNM/rc2mGpc SJfCHjPmGycZZxlXG/cZf2c02KnJmElTBUT+jdW02lhhbqJNxgbzUtpr3ki2qQ6EE/bSU3BxDkHg qsZDghlW3pUmqgoJwoSoMpns1gAyXBqRWvHYS0FdVBU59YDCuOAFqfxb8hqnqnE6Y9YSJ69PvoK8 mLT6tLOzVI/ecNpisToYicePb4+lSMcR0Nge60xhduKGjcEgNXCCo2VU3hwfjR36JkjuxY9jq4Rb 7owbYCP+ExmIenSb6ZUtwJZMNh8RRAkaBLP2rqbzDDHYDTB+/5+0yPsJLaKMzzX8ZYQhwkwKsYQB Ywtpy8i8k8K78ulzf9L7JH+KPllok7ZkoYlOEibJlab1Qre4Xu42DSKRNCj3m8xtxoWmxWZxhTgg bsYUmwTRqAhEkLiBLmmMjSVupkPASvXSAgk/g9koUliWJjM4CjFVzcqVkJtkjkkWbQ6Xw3oKivv6 hEdgCZQSCDmFEzIPcpOtNrvNb2u1wdznMoNH42REBjCLSQYHuyNs1P8Pdi0jBZizYwLGsNZ6AdIg XD7nF+TFEFEfEzLMM0As53C51CcJnR0AD66QaGcHvApGIxtJ50aIIES6mGajNCh/ejK+bEu89xi1 0evoLpokiyO3iGvOxUAYT4pTE/aGDFuEGGlY0ywGv6Hc0GCYa+gxbDAYtijUTgXFTz1KuVKvzFcu od3KIO1XzBYqKcJiimA01LoKp0hSFSpgQJ9xyQAA2T74BgDO6So5CeR2dkyQjIv1N7UGXRkwvBJd mMPvAMx1G5sRCPatMBA0syBwnoNswY0FnpYQkqBSgX0E1nXsA0iId4mfjLbOfwB0/gOg8x87xLsm rb3AWkCu60Lsx9BENC2Bf4bkjRsQBoFzpqMYYn7SP2LTjtEy4cpjcvm5/5JPn9ek47B1N42+Ib+C TE0ycug/07IkIgFrZlcySVZSLamuRXSRPN/QZW63tju7kuYnOzyoiNNS2GCMfEhbjNs8Qlq5RwiW G00pGB/va4oHUl8fKoB3OLIBvDmmED7WyrlG2JRjz6Es/B7NETM5oWZ67Nx0sPMEoB3og4vHj9hX Z+vUdybMfFSMGETHTQeQGyMr6nV5dIP3C5EBb5ID8UFmOZSVEjlzSc/yjqXn774jPrp4cU/30nYq f/uu0ZnxkTf+HI9R9bXXqEHOXRF/7ejR+Ks9vStXL19OA8eO0OCqZavXxHpoFp0Cl/61+B/gUlUx f57Jq5tBlw5UCfxRK5nsnprR7G7OaLUtsPfaDanlxOAwCAaDMaXcJBpVe9AfFJweXUz3owjiAtPh M83MqWsshv7xmJXxLudCnPp+wlldH7QHo0Eh1eA2crGO4LqOawAJsjJyskJbJysAOlkB0G8H4G0+ Vca1gc+ZmtnTZxlmQV2sIoAborpNlkhW8BwMd1G/5E1INzdMm/Pru06epN+86rHGts5fVlaV7Lj4 qfu33gw3VLIv/+G0OXNisCiKS6of2DNnY7Y/LfaTcKSkL+Fv3ZrA4XltvkozkOOfTKszGuyN7saM xXShvcO9nq4Ruk295svoZrOTKUIHcRh85QKXqGyttGlIcgtySjk31RiqtaDo9MDzgM32mZbBsGtN ZwRl5Vxr5Zkoq9URgIzn2OWyNFU0Mm4W3eR/ozT1CIB8AVJLYzDqw50IpIyjtUbHKwiYZTu4pkyB noSWZGbZ5xGAhL8/7rDdGh+N2+LvnaR37zncOHfJPft7isvDW1rfO3XxtROLw0JrbEg+HSouu/1r d/++it6rLc/KSI79MlhcuI5J0KvgyQvwFEpA0CSSEHLFY9JuAgDtRsbXKZymkvnay9ceC9vv5g4v 9JWfhNJUt79AzU/J9mdHqtVKx6SkCn9l4Sy1wdGU1OCflVdf2C60pbX524ovSV2Z1utfGe6O7PD2 +/sDA4UDxVe5QkbN5qhS2Qoq0unLlzKUYDCnnIe9ETUI5nt8XAD4mLjBbCG27fSQoI9lnXRxAuBj DcUlkMEDpfbS/lLB2DdxLLmbyLslkm66c5FczdILnnbnovzVzlX525xb8q92XpV/i/O2fFNnB0+K c8LHaiwxl82qOVi8Uc/0wgXR0wvMIUFIMpF3QupJFuY2tf7m5rvjo7ttG2j+5Uef71ne/NCyk0/Q mr/fAdvS1hb/6w3f/Xn3Nu2Ded//Af3hogemaI01Uz67eOW+Tcsv9rl97sLn7n38o5qi9xu7rlzd 2Zduy/cUHWSzhp/0IXjDQDZpqVSqUJC1tRv9xhajSJZQBAeFNuqGjvhUMzEsSUtaEPZjxGxmcyar zHhgbS6CAXzCRTDfw84HMIo9MBD0yFS482w4Fn6Lsb5uljN6RDrqw9gHJ2MfoCfBc3+Sg0OsZ2OR TIVcq62cSRvBepJsUBYpVyEFjCJ2KhukRdJVkii5EX1XaT1PkG1CjF0hsrBZRHpAUBvILFYHLEpw YCcnopMKuRQ5M4p/sxgWK8Q2sVfcgZKrFQYWnWRmJ1Qd6yGLLzPBzyOSbMWMTZgTMDIRi4y9Gf8s 9uZL9EX6Iuy4CJY35Uz0eynqp64DRi3kGe2BmeIqcZsoWqlZkCRBllWLOZmmiilyqppqLhAL1ALz FKFaLJXK1RpjmWmyuVmol+rV2cY6U7O5jS4GxhfLiwwdxjZTL+0TeqU+uc/Yy2xCaZO607jRtNM8 weLGUw1uRcbcUZHbgUa+RkjUKGCKIHAQPQE2ppBypZnUK9vJZkUhG2HMRW1dtkGbpKyyOj5EzpSN moVmIZ653GDJDAo9z7KG+Me48W+4Lv71P8Wfjv/ylfiW52g1LYeqolUMB9JL54ug+Qull89nSm+i V/XwTZhVZSYntFs20+0GwSTJJp/kMRVJIVOVcY5Ua2oXu6R2eZGx1bTIvFpcJ62WVxm7TavMO6RN pmQzG5vRrRrgxUL6ym4E7WTJQE1mRVBZ7hNhH8Er5AqVwkxBNqqpaoFarTaqsqAaTAhkK4IVZX25 KMabiUJihay0qkYlVSlQqpVGpUtRlJXwGTtL2QL7ErECWDUcBXz4Z1jSlP8DBZ1GgSOBz/6kWFyg b8f74t2/Ewxx+S16A/02fNsAgii9sduFd4X3YvcKneg7Cumkd4ABlbykLS2iRVK+ocKgUU3SDK2G 1VK/weRVUtU8JV9dqHSovUqfqqpszCjrlmSBWLFQ6HGDKMGMBwWxMaOAoMU0aJLAoHBXxllU90+Z Pcd5EECcO6oA3uXsCUBX+gD00AoDUBUE/mSMPQj5PabIwa9gVf13Jlzt4CzLSENnCIYWnTDAwAwj 0juxsydjn/yB3kJvh1U9HNskbBU7YisFpLIparqJrAILRtKhVSL4pahJaq5aqc5QF6or1S0Y8yG4 oAaDCPkD+5bF9TC7BoMkGDfxqNgaExe9YEzmECZ8Z17lwLTbmc6UPcfh4bPMtgfmvnp+i3jDyA3S vJGV4tBRac3QofM3Ejo6En9J9o3OBls4j9BWAX0SIvDMCCvkYpfKPsbC8Ze2wmZYjRqGDGkrSKeM rtE6LCYplGryhKQwjHOlrYivi/m6wzY3c2nRGlt3xvriHabt7v6MHUUmQc2fWuLUnILTGVBb0ml6 eko0IE2crsKntqPkw5lXwVkUPpke0OUAt+iZovSyhwg+kmFG5BNylnCblekmzckdBV72knDRmHXG 9VSiug2eAu8YTj+reYxGtPXA0A1IQvgrohUilPFn3PrjWhkuodI2QWWPnJCGusRzWhV7Jsx0yHaz ysS4mQfazFxRmrnNbIb6VNoYjDVUA9a7L8hKsDpGOBAohBr7IV3MvIiwnqjTI3JItLOQHC/JwCFY KKGKRFQemhCRkOyqr6yBEp38LD0RJ2U8ntqWH9k+75Zfr+tdSTPvKy7M758660iPqeqF3i0PadHa xxe+Vz93xcDXlt/3NedUV7L/1O2DdxQXB9QMbUFKsiMv5wl7dl5kwo1r4xkQY+6k5J627p45oIFj oIEDUDVJJEBdWkG5UGGf4ikJ1AsN9maPFljkWuUaVHekW2xGJbnWKVlopqaYzKqbzSnDCwNgA8O0 SWPWxFjU6OOxYB6qFxhyCUqhsEZVC7gUkzV2OYC/awXcZjyAwrtolmBLM3LPGwYkrmA2OOKenH2N PguLkLF5A/CmHiW08JPR/pBPNoBPNTO70qKwK9H+mPcTwEeIoGHPXhT2jU1YYrbGDXY2pZCNZ7jR Dr04llJCHY2BxfpY4YxLr4gwOPVqmQMtdTMfWNm1v8EyNNxycP3Jt09cedO8HzS2bmr6zsNC1bWv z25pKUYSxx17afr8+Avxd079auak2K7sdIS0KFkz+hfx79LXSJA8os22h1pCQphm2Qq92SmTaYVt srcipYm2mOptLd7pKR20zbaG9tq20022JIfDHbVIwaAvKhrtIR4dCUHIAcVjrs9rY4h+TZvA8Xtd KJlTdXKakdO7EdwABHMOMHJD0chRBq/mM44p4+6sMUyd4QkmYO3C9BLUBfJLiboH5hmOZ5Z0okWQ r6pM/PvFP+za9mxjUyst/mf3sTmmhY8uuuvYI/dVb4kUNHpMM4pLZzY2/vEm6qKTKvNO1zX+9oVn f5+Z4ok4QZtrQZt1CdoUtJwaX0n6pECLrza9MdCurFb6HUYXFZxyynQbCqUza2WT0/1vZA2vlBV8 WRoXLIxGQlzkcNOOOPheTkikkCOR24GgzQ+1YiY4WAH2uIS5UafTNI7oNF7BlpampjBBgpB3XAuz u6n8biqPNQHPQLTKSywZrLSpmACsd19AiSC8CyJBYRiQTIww15z5OdWIqumCI5QlOJnU4DVtzjLx wnS9VDc8d2jVqb/Obah/pKd9b/Pw8OytM+8c2ntz632bZ1xEy6lz/2sXzW7NyaNvnRsVvpHl++Oz T/9qJvPA+0bfkbqlnXgzwE9OaXm5UthaIk2x1mTWSc3W5szF1lZvn7U7eat1e6aN1vj99vSpHlbn /a5eCWk2G6J2MGmQy/sgJ8RUhmXgXWhL9ZEAxyqT1fWcFq+H9+2H/y36kQnCKawgEtWPaS6ORhdH m4vTp4ujzcWPu1C1qrS5do8720CS7mwzScyizciAhLlfyEPOwbGSNl4WHwro8QuXh6dBFIPUPfLM tMry6xdu/MtEU9fJdfH346do+Oyb/3iU3nTzLYcsQtqq2yaWlCwpej6/Es60BzRaG//s74XfvOfg leBd2H2iS8kEzp7WVvk4Zfm4I626q92bZVRxSFEPMdumqU7ZilczNKNgtBtteNWT0waEFAZu5izH YCgXyoZn9tmdxKZZHVU2L6NRW4DRk41fYxuXbjbwNPYyCkV1GKrAXUzaoX2e4ZxVhbN72a5OHeNg JvFKS+FHcwAGBs8ZRVFUwkL0zOCBbkKKiHlkHj1fhvpcKCjG1qLL5F+Ru20dnR8/NDw4ePLxaG+h fLEx6ZJrc+8cmS4+cWfO07/Bazjg2HiHVAc6CsFDjmjFU5OmFZYWTS6pNzYnzS6sLWouWUI75cXe PrpW7vPulPsDzizZFfTka5kSwod6TogBWhobFDITmmidMN1jsCtUCWaXciS7mO5gBiEHGBIZoOkU 4iNKCvj2U23uf8Dfvn/l7VJ/abRUCHPSC/NZCael8Cwe4nJxLYfNRQoXlgh84NEpvJqewQqHsd49 cSz8w7QJK9Qb+33RPOD5ujAnV87eOUjLQc/AW2alNyxDAjvhC+wOafpFdo/H42c7fjjPNOHUiu7L QqHMttu3gvtnTH9sac8VTdBHzd/Qbj945W3zvjcYfyv+aWrycVfFhIK8S+tX1tfBwzMcOD17Zkte fsnIy0JPVsYLJ4dPREHXeJNQ6oLU9dIyLUn0eD2bPXhbQK1NkmyUWtWvlLAsFMxr8pktwK06ZmPz KYDlpjl5+F26QMwye47NIeYqnrAQshg+0X4dNgS3EM5p5eyuhBM04fYXuSHFn9KdIji+wEPcRkjw kA9xKt1GAJB4EcLKmQdt3UYA8Ck3JgHAx2dPg8eEJ6H9N24sMICrQOte9r7K2I8zD8vZjO3Alkke mAw1XExzIe0cL6qF26CbDF6P1DXsSkm9uHnOD+YMD7cPL3/kZ8LOOXtyCwtmTxn5GYyD55vmvQKL QCAPwSy4Qv4D7HcDuVdLovUC0FOFyjv41YN4c+hGYGhEK+K46pb4wBDZBeYkLkkYDEfHhzdVQKm0 e5BHMnSEwO9JICSR2xhDCA7oCAHApoUnrEb5TMp71fHhdr7FtVL4rTD3oaO8oolCSogYJ73ipZcs w8NyypPncvDiKBFGT8Q7BA8fSSo5rYVMcrosjA/HOy1VNpvtmsHakkyTB03URLvZ6xicKADoIRYA en/YId4fL6viHNHAcKCVblNyP16k4vG1VG7HQOm8ptuFqTx4izZK7hmhpSKXgPVY/RKAD1iuXmlL NTCMpcpMXqbemDY+WkxrZ2np2JDxTgOcZlYFeoaPG4X0GPe/5jSRfRU8wMSpH+RfUWRK7ypubPd6 re/R7zHEmJ465bAcMqfn5+dvmCteeSezAH8ObnsI3GYm57T6fOF39A9G0UjxigbNEPzWYhqxliAf ssC8RthO2etL1Mezl4d59pKlLmW8KYb4B+K6/azkHug5q+VzDiLWAPKXCCFwKhE5lYhwpRGX5VQi +jDf46SRsKfHSWOcInSmwak8Lw/a4LdA+5+cVxjAeUW+ejw1DdwleIUlBVGoradVUEHLYk08vfkP Pb0Z47lNpFjGU5vSQ5/Fte3Dw4L/TOy/6XsD8WsU94hPiMRGgK3HgbKvAVsi+bqWh1Sxyuj7RsIH mLB8OSczGJLDN4iSv7ExAkiQP+Xno60PDUDCZ2CBBpghzADmwF5pnBw6+YA44TNHmlH814aH0RVd YhqSofXC9JTWLGaLBUnZSQX1gfrcRwsNR3Jojj8jXU2uzc+SMmTqSFe1YuovLinWiluL+4vlf9/5 YqYIkxkfF3OLiqYwgUq5zYo+vs99LQBnNSePj5QwCqe8oA97P+FiFMDHWpgPhhtPtMeRY05PvEnI KcLOEQYDFwiz+xwcF+w5Dv4ctH+tu+OOXHZ7B7eMsfczfnsOsLsDOM/JAcCoFmTM5PD7OJ7xChEu 9PHHMFhp8/nSxyYFQKLcI52fjLZOeAD02WGALqTTTexJaLNQgA5oeI0EUI/foTl2OURHZDyeM0aB Diaf+Y9PIIIr49qZ7eXim8XDaiDB8bYMnHX+5hImeFyM44UkSPLxJpPqHt3+5muPIXnY6kleOLfl zhZR0sE5tzMx/9Dyjd/N2zh8ydGHhJ2NV+WHi1qmJk/NjFUIO2ftzg+HmeiXOnc2zetu6277E5Jg Cd0LSvLSgi/rXtQN/q90b/IFupfLRDKmaONjybHX2Qx/SdFihrV8hu8LVC6bx4Ti5bP5lSqXUyUU 6Oe6VvfHx5Xw/6vK/b9pXH1u/meNy9EOhcs8nzekDcC4Gdnbc5pviq3cUe6e4m221Tvq3c1e1R41 Sp6oaEL8QM93A9Dz3QA+0Y1tS1oqZ1CmmsbiHhA13PzRNRVyipxfcAarpwFWdTrnwDltKqNiciDV nupPjaauT5VcPOKJCBcwztbwetIUL5vJxMtg3EBVuG+EksG4lsomUIHfhDXP9LJjgHenjEswTusX GC8Mjzz1y4x/ekF+d/yND5ih0ob4u389E3+PJp/5K0058cAtt/3wgVtv/pEwIf5R/ClaQ534mxp/ Mv7R71988fe//v1vgdFj8RXSAWCURZSytJxSodpTGqgTmjy1gYWIJl2m7kw3jUWTZESTjGZLIpqE IBLQwvV8IprEaffo6AtjpuTHunJPVA+MKfOvxOqn/2NYCcLmPwsr6dIIc63TMwN0afQfxZcSavDz jDCXOP8mwjQuWL4cYbpoZu2hFYuuaxoebn6879k3Tuy7fu59zQgw3TEk1Ox946JZc3Pz40Xyf2+O tsV/Ff/g2VMzqmN7sn0vcX9sBffH2FwYtPAUcSpiKJMDs8Vm34z0WQEWQZEFp5SiIYJiQQTF6HTr MZL/2Mr/TyMp57QOTvf/90gKL2xWYc0iZgKvlsVSGBsk4ic2dhcVu/59FGUspJ9QAV8Oo9AQIqv/ s181vOjHK54+M7++9uDyxdc0wpG6aOuMex+4+qZ59+H9eF9zE5IBtgOvNje15ueVjDwhbA2lv3ri qRcRSeESXNwIA9iFqmc3sTpgg8H+ssPKqzPZkbwBrY7X1H+s5fPYKHFr7n63YDFwFQh7FMM1cHOe wfCDfYjJ6YYagIQRk4iSjulLHPhQc7LbGVE+DNrmypLF8riyBPDfelBvb9LnEuFCK43FPaEAWQUp i3vqoQBulSWUnbjRVNhSuegehJX6f9QxsahIPGAyzpk68hep83uLm2W8D4GCudG3xd8io1BG52uL FMGY5hFS03KNhdmlxprsWuPs7IvlTu/84MLIgtL18lpvd2BFpLfUvV0edA4EtuUPhPfRvdbdvj35 36TfTjMTW0qBlCnuyoIYYYIgKyt3mh4n0Lixj/DANNEYRNDjHDNxhLYCjjm2VtoK0iq4TE7hsaQU RAfgrHOtBUf+00fYKSm4UhflDGBaChGTNBJMMWCS3h8T5ONuLM5gDyFudqsLRY6OYez5TMvjgnx/ IgfRVTFYIRu42DbwVIIB9g+m86pynjT4PHXArBKIYz19zOTyeCgL5jN/U49NyZdqKCvK81hBL0+o jwUE9Rc8kVNP9ibj+w/4E38b+8POX80wdbyyYue1ublr879RcdOO6smTfnLJiufrTY2/XL5qf7jw 4vJvhK+YOZPW3vbUlNCLdS2tC2uzslKMKba8Wy5t2F4SqZoYeqaiqeWihlDIa0kxZTbNwlxPG31f iMl34jsiB7Vai+zDaymi2WGYZjWb5LS0ZASmWzIGMwQbuTZDtTo4aSNYCtw5uJXNYBiJPpNqYMEu RH1e05xMZRp4wCvBC2PkjcMJ8jakM/I28Htg7990FWxIZpg37E2/gLjB+LoXEsFL/AnvrQwBL0S7 EoHrClTL4gUpXh/+eaxQiFV8feKPDg4ODtMr4zvVFO+clgkrvHib2XX0OWHenXR6/Ik742L78nB+ TpqRUf3DsCEWgefxUofmNiuphu0GUZA9RtmJmDRVvzoo/Sm3A5ic/Txk8qGWwY0GlUdKLrTWYLxz omNGv249aGVcnurBEW4Gkxv14Mi/j40gPq0nUAEkzO5EoHoMzzigv+AD4G+6olM517A2lyQA/sEl ibrnwtgIt8ousC4SooWrOtRM88gIj2flVgDh48h2lkmLhrseXDP01LDDl7ZwXtNPmod3Nrf+9gXU L1/Zti1clD97ilgLHKOAURoEjhVynTY9VypQKqVqZYbUpCgFcrWsyXPlbrzP5cOZkg+lEvkkT5xE qsRZZKaInLygJsolkDNHpQR4FW9ZGB1VFnwDpw9fyZLIdaxcQhSTUCexWZTEdCZwxMtRLcEK5c52 6pWBF1ZLoGqAJcwTJQPSYLzmp/Hof9HFFJRw/l6pc2SPuA29wfcB0dVOVEp8coyoQC6TISjj++Tz SjWYaUz+7GH8YBUzxCJaKBSIOVKunK2GzeV0ioyyD3kRbZc65EXmdcIyaYXaZ1xhusS8jX5d2CgN qDuMm0zbzZkWNnyDD0USxOhAtHmsTMIEp32sQgIIYJ8YiOCjSD5uXcGtA0HttzlQJ7HeJhL05XUu +wDoVUIAUFPLqC3x3YErEiWsMGuQ/EwUEwDgvr1eTgHTMkzDYyUVSVCYSUpl/NUH42/E//yT+CtP PU+Tb6eZJxiqxM4Rhq7vij1sYfxUg7neBZyZ8QWRa43mNOoW3YY0Y56YZ6ghU2i5WC6VK+WGKcap ptmkmdaLKCdR6g3Nxjkm1KmKi+U2w2Jjm3k97RbXyN2G9caV5pBdIGpUKFFbBE39utAPovaZzCaO LB5SEX2SLKH4wozaCWm7tBnFJDLqShF3FqwUSDNLEoutHNfwokeVgk5ex17HYZ/S0KxdVtRgoBCD S3rpchYG6SzlRTZhVnGhf46BvQ7IEfTFgguEPljdCa86kXadgSn98z/g/dnWM3QKrfljvIn+JD5f KBZK4ovp92OvMOxMhX3NOMGAmqHpEq/WbVW6lX5FMYoGOVVMlmfQJrGdLKLb8PUaA6MJ2YcKoiYy Q8JXo/Cyr2ARViMwgjdzWPGkPiTGCbM4L8jkOuQpUE6UJDVIvdJm4OVyFbURYG6wARsOmFqP5LCq IfyjYoiXz7BppnjJZuCZF+J1/0UX0cVS5zkD/bWUN/KUiEnF+3TImfwZfTfiO0iTPepkvCUyS2xQ l4oL1G51UOxXTaiPmKbIqI+YdkF9xH6z3xw1d5nXmwfNsnAlr5N466vqJNgHWRIFEuKfR7YL18Su EFfFNgrfvUasuOOqEfjYqIhgP1RIbNWhL61hxCG6pH9Fi31By/kVX83yI18bQrEV+1bW51/KKvrS 97H0r2N9/m2sWmSM2BexZpJG0gRcN5PZ+PbIRXgbuZXMJfPIfHzLrw3yYhFpJx0o41qCKivgC1hz YWE/BW/TkZnzFy5onR9e2LtxRc+lPf8HDWgfwwplbmRzdHJlYW0KZW5kb2JqCjE3IDAgb2JqCjE0 OTE5CmVuZG9iagoxOCAwIG9iago8PCAvVHlwZSAvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0b3IgL0FzY2VudCAxMDA1 IC9DYXBIZWlnaHQgNzI3IC9EZXNjZW50IC0yMTAgL0ZsYWdzCjMyIC9Gb250QkJveCBbLTQ5NSAt MzAzIDE0NDYgMTAwMV0gL0ZvbnROYW1lIC9HU1ZUUFMrVmVyZGFuYSAvSXRhbGljQW5nbGUKMCAv U3RlbVYgMCAvQXZnV2lkdGggNTA4IC9NYXhXaWR0aCAxNTIxIC9YSGVpZ2h0IDU0NSAvRm9udEZp bGUyIDE2IDAgUiA+PgplbmRvYmoKMTkgMCBvYmoKWyAzNTIgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMjY5IDQ1NCA0 NTQgMCAwIDM2NCA0NTQgMzY0IDAgMCA2MzYgNjM2IDYzNiA2MzYgNjM2IDYzNgo2MzYgNjM2IDYz NiAwIDAgODE4IDAgODE4IDAgMTAwMCA2ODQgNjg2IDY5OCA3NzEgNjMyIDU3NSA3NzUgNzUxIDQy MSA0NTUgNjkzCjU1NyA4NDMgNzQ4IDc4NyA2MDMgMCA2OTUgNjg0IDYxNiAwIDY4NCA5ODkgNjg1 IDYxNSA2ODUgMCAwIDAgMCA2MzYgMCA2MDEKNjIzIDUyMSA2MjMgNTk2IDM1MiA2MjMgNjMzIDI3 NCAzNDQgNTkyIDI3NCA5NzMgNjMzIDYwNyA2MjMgNjIzIDQyNyA1MjEgMzk0CjYzMyA1OTIgODE4 IDU5MiA1OTIgNTI1IF0KZW5kb2JqCjggMCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUgL0ZvbnQgL1N1YnR5cGUgL1Ry dWVUeXBlIC9CYXNlRm9udCAvR1NWVFBTK1ZlcmRhbmEgL0ZvbnREZXNjcmlwdG9yCjE4IDAgUiAv V2lkdGhzIDE5IDAgUiAvRmlyc3RDaGFyIDMyIC9MYXN0Q2hhciAxMjIgL0VuY29kaW5nIC9NYWNS b21hbkVuY29kaW5nCj4+CmVuZG9iagoyMiAwIG9iago8PCAvTGVuZ3RoIDIzIDAgUiAvU3VidHlw ZSAvQ0lERm9udFR5cGUwQyAvRmlsdGVyIC9GbGF0ZURlY29kZSA+PgpzdHJlYW0KeAGUvAd4FEe2 BjpK3QMNIgwDUjdMiwwCASJnEAIJCUkooIQQyjnnnMPMdBiNcs45IBQQOSeDSTa2sdcJ2zitc9ot cVvc+04L7LX33v3ee8zH9Jyq6qruqlMn/OeUdCT6uhIdHZ25B/cfdLWyXnUwLN7vkF9EkktioJn7 VrHGY5wan6+ZphhfoDOu0GWn6bHT9IUzE2fnG1TM1y83WGAqkTxYYPrarMzJL8OyafQCSX7Xp9MW zyfOT1u0QCKhmqctgcvcN2aJ369PWypers2QYDo62DS2dvCGRWCMf5CtX6xftLllTGxafFhIaKLJ ioCVJubbtm0wW79u3XqT/X5h0WGxsTHRJi4B8UFB0Sb2wSFrTCxj1qw2sUsMXGNiERlp4izel2Di HJQQFJ8cFLhGfJWQsOgYk7AEEz+TxHi/wKAov/gIk5jg/9jdX9/eQvx34N+mZLLQ7t8KJWdgEiVz JMslByUekkhJhqRSclZyX/KTzgIdcx0PnVCdDJ0anUc6L3Tn6i7R3aJrq+utm6Z7S/dvuj/qSfWs 9QL0CvVq9Xr1rujd13tX7wv9KfqR+iP6V/V/M5Aa0AbbDfwMUg2KDYYMHhp8aPAjthdzxHyxWCwL Y7BT2HXsQ+yfuD6+FN+D2+NRuBqvxQfws/ht/G38S3xcOlO6XnpEmix9LP1S+nyK6ZRNU/ZPcZni M6ViyjtTvpyqP3X+1C1T908NmNoxdYyYT0QSlcQ54jbxDvEl8ds0Ytr8aRumeU1rmXZt2hvTPp1u MH3u9MPTy6ffm/69oa7hHENLw2rDJ4bfzsBmKGasnGExI3hGwoziGQ0zemdcn/HWzCkzjWfazfSa GTozY2btzJGZj2bpzZo5a/6sdbPsZh2flTlLNatz1sisW7Mez94y22G2z+yI2Rmz2dmjs2/Ofmf2 r7P/RzZNRsqWySxlTjI/WYysTNYlG5Hdkj2WfSL7x5wpx/SFacI0NA3z/v2H4cdzAz4exZ/+6RuK hGkfo2lQ+Nfr7+WGyAqfiBGiJ2JRtIFghRuiI7iQK2w2mEjAhFy02UA4ghuKvT7Pn+z2Rd5cQvb1 iezmCH/S4WjgLq+Auu5YRUZDUW3RgNRQ9otHQNwRK9Ku5chooMLxtV/CkYxCs37uu3WHPj3advN1 krDUb21MS0pKE/83trY2NrbShsH6SIWOCkcFlaCG71dXdBSpxXLxShuG6n//Y5DNY/rZjnNLhCmk EC/YwCdeSBBskA1K+HHom4fvKD57/9fzaApl+BBjyxrZEio/v6hQWSxsFpyNiG8xdRtT1Uve7ser y1VF5XRVgaaoNqg6UpvOZ0nfxcIDj6a7U8S+PfK4aJYroPkMLiWOJI7F4kHempIYWtiJa0/08ecp Qy5ejgy/XykYCjNWvvz+Hs2AEvimDdFx/M3TlwZvUL2t+am1dHVGSVoAKfjhDmq/Ii8FCsSKx1SX bpGoBH8//WLAqGIo+EiTFUUgP/wOP1Z6QSEEYlo/jacTKZTgOxs8RwMUwcPXUh9Sn9xsv/uAZgrZ zGKSQP74o7aR4bNUW1N2UhldksWnR5JCBE5A/0UX1QNvkOhW3yT1b6MRKAgruqoefo0c78If8adK xxSGUFR8WnXtGonu4G/yo6WnoCha7GYMWrXgD/gx7VWFMiCb3U8JMoxAMZi2Q1vfcBrtHLcwqhko b2o+KxXiMXVSUWxu8BrhdSNGxSjVxUwxXNWMkilW5Rc3sJyqUq1lShh+DbpnlHOquEXdLjVEGVgH 8jiJpn2AzC5+0z362gMpgbKxuv6G/vr2138wuruqMaYpvCbK2PD5Yf3vrpgLewQrT/OVKzy+QtZo y/Vv/k4bPvee+xnaMoQWo/0kmp+IpnkgQ0XmycKGmCsBGUadxyvT6kKkFwSsXZguGJGCUYJg6CUY KDKCc5MT/aWGgg6Wl80yhXR5uaakvALtQK5GjS09vcOjUGetH5Udm5iiSIw9nulPuUe1nOxp7ThZ TZ+qOa39nIcGxzG0DFl1DdQ1N3cbK33VLsdJQvDFbQNdAo9Q0UmVjVk0IfhhcYGp8V4uQpRQZuRx mGWPe0oJIQRzCOC1nrRgiRNCFFYTX5J/ejl0GYUVheZHx1itF1KMCCERy4vLiksKP7rXyPNJcl9B XcaIsZCMjXq0RWkL0WLhGLS5gnnlsbwfzQQxCerkWOG+kSpGlaCMQg5pRhdbT3W8Tj295r5jh4vb Fku/vgfptOAdWedeHdMWYbzj1o++aBaFQtFshKEjT+Pve16mr7nt615P2bpnhh+n+QauUksSLwzn JpzKbckcknoh/Xg0E80j0dx2NPMiMlDUnaxo7DwbUG8U616Qnhki9RSmwxQLFClQMOWXBENFfVBl Sru31NAbueHFZ9Un75CoDSc44QuD0NSU8PDE5jOpCsHmQOfRhuTeJOOws3fTnlAfPmw5dZY+OdBw 5h6JvsLf4s+UDgJbnjyKHVX5FYcpkD9WNKzuuQFbAUeh8m2ul9979+aVjz++5b53t6P7JpoYX/R8 SC6YIh9kigv+Qry89Djvb0sKd3BiXPX8R7nQKEQI4fDdiOCKGuETDh+4AgXlsG5SIUL+6ZVju/c4 um3d4Xj1nfduXPyMJrbX7O7cr6gL6AgaCJcSNreehf5KIU80H01HFmivgCGJYOPuW5AWRMfnZuUl JJS+VtZbf0JKON98L+Z76ocPem7cpLu769rargj7LhoVxBXmZmZJCZfrH0V9SyHpl6feuUQTR5q8 ToYrgkdvpr1LfXSj4fQNmnC//V7cN9TZi+U1o/Tjtns3B9+SDr3b/P0/SKSb9I3/fcW3h5ddEWQU yM75wOgHhJ1oiqCDDj672XL5Gl1knR+SGiE9Hns83oUKiKhpT6KJolH1GIiJO/hdEDvnFYalx/hw G3KiDt+gDij0VRClAbyflThf9iC4jikMWwItay0oU4vUIFeaGOhvvHCVfCvyom2/gjjReqL+AnXv dISXd3LcJid6qVVQdFDoAVuvPXFbcwKLo5RHpZqhNu4LinjNYfOAKSXMXuyy1IEm/iPDEP+R2Qhl YnFufrY0JiUkI5Ai/l93939sQAy/3oF0fyM/yn4v7rGCWL3RU9AXZpNCMfIUPFExfDzgo0Q6Ab/u +0BBeAqGr5iabBcMRaauC65M7vAebTQikn0zo2LSg1jjuFRtQzhN/G9pRISfSu5K6RY2omQjwlId xQQqzQsOJnuESIn8lvy23K6kK0XlcWVS4gTyF3aBustBXsIeFCD7jhjsjgkNjRH/dw8OdncP0oZv nQ1zdfEJs9znPXj92rkTb9GyXzjhWznxB0M3AENH/J8MLbJ8hNAwyfL/atH0L5aXmSAnXLa32CNA 7UQJCNvKeXIZnFTYg5+IYdl3LUHBXx3fN07LBQthp70DywZHGgv7cP7SIHePGl+APRxRF5+mkTNe fMxf7UAJuzHmSAyrprQlDfU93cgVBRgJVsgqsza1MbXRmK3VsBqKaWpgKym0BSOW6F8YCfTyChT/ j1y4MDJyAbRpLFY0ph56gxwfwN/mT0zqphrQP5UnGi6i0PEfjDreqGir7ZUKOZgqrDAm21tYOpFk VJyqLsrxyR1j2YIuUDKNWMe5lsGuMZCu2VhDYGV8sxMKm/gBRGc1NuTTG9h3HB0W6o0Ilmd5jtTA RUHIZqLDuKyl+FiY2poS3sJ2xXC8P116lA+1JydO41bq4KIABX+6m3uXQo+wT0+KL24oM3EEme5K CzCLV7XDF/kHFDqIVbWwXCOdnKBSFhYIZ4VfjPzc4+MSEqSCBc6fG+IeUOPzsLdH1cVj0EEoCkMr 8bdGQqys/AMPQMF727JYjQdd6sX7upETZ/AD6rAiXxi4BwYmZO8dCuH4YzTs3eOu5MQw7qg+XuSj INBs/Kef0FqB6/TrcauNMEY1WNhYdqPjM5iMHbjaJoZxoYSvQJUfwF/nB0qvKIRQDEYIdCAnBvDD 8GoeChQK1fZ40eEExoYSItFy6OMhvOU5Gubl/+Os/K8OCOSJgdwZeZccb8QfgvUB5k4jVuRXEJF4 UFg5YWkkmI5bJj4o6C88bSw0YFpfjdthcqIRtwYRdFwh3jymPgNCKwq/qvyo6HWFNotlq0I0Bb1r uOKvhCajrj1VwdpQeMkwrOj0ZMtE/KL6evFZRbdbQ1RXALIX+o1OuLcFNwZJwYwB2+jcHXK8G78P IvCsQgjDSr35ABtSSMVdeO8Sb0XCmdT+6NPQXwRWdFY9fJ9EbugLwW1y9f0UYulF9Yn7Im++yQ9N 8mY2ph0q66sZ7frECA1jXZsrw0rjyr2Ml6MXcsER+xpdNTAUIrBSXz7ESpxrQqjFiqPzo9KOCpEi Q2qQQv6g4XT/Y+qN02GHamnDYl8f9R5KqEI7USRGMJVsaQmpuqkcK+iXopWhgs4nwjqKGLvSf7K9 XfrH0hIyEyt3Xuv/ig9PD/NvUvA0hGyLcHNiujwopfvqufrb7Wfp8x2DHcPUYFuMv3eGQ8Ix2iMu NDqYMpTtrTyWwkdQ6w7HHjpKy1reF7xweOTQfaI6sFWHFHkqUABWdEE9DMp5HV5ypqylqV0q23uy Z6TxMtXXUZx1DjjX7uCkxSsbGC9A9+ULnfZv3GTz5Ifv7r/55bOr9ksVhjKPrfEcH0CXefPh1iQB rG+FzPG7/dEuziEhjtBBpGA+flj+5b0DprRsYIWtxfrgkNr2BEVUT8a5m+Rv1+9/Bn1wwnGkKxgi 26eXG689hG170fX+xfSPqWePOq9coW/d6fv0nyQ6uhBJBduthxLdHRVcLVtRRz4FYXJSC9znI/J9 yD4Y/hFavvNTYf4h15TgIEVAQLLDXnJ3i/1IkCJo5FrK6xSHJuSXOv22b4z3dfeIO/Pph11jl+mJ 74Wn8isBz02ef+Y2agCb1TqY433EzRoMUmIQt1BHFXlP8sk59dAjEm39Ge/vKEhtoTuSqhP7N/Zt rfYvjZASK3D3eL4kjBbm4iUjrdwlSn1MZZsVEhJqnJ6eWxiVJzXcimex+Vym4qqNU8t2atuBWA8P mtiBHUjgtMG0cAAv6WvgLlOGftixaL40ghYovHS0mbtAIQw74WKQIpjixyL50iixQtvfy5+jkKkv RoRgoTBuNC3swEt6Ovl+ali4jVnXhg1HKxL6z+c+oq6NlNaepTPR6vjs1OI41jg1o6Qsl86uKK7t JlHFGH6yU63spdF2XBmZyPhQIS0YMYo/eetdYWaPV6tPnZ8xKsdiTihLHZ4JO5DKCC1FJteuVleN nDAWmrDU6KQ4b29BV9AxQidAGpwWN9A17OpZtfIsjebhyoBgtQ3l+gNG/AN/zJ8sPaMQArDSQN4X dk7X71ZJdAd2pan54nBvQXqfog8tP1LnX+rCGhOF1nLBCXmDOjMcvGGADLCzPeriARpReFFwovoY 5Q/SbTdW0l5zsfbMHXTMSFvL8mVtfH5Jtjb9DljVjU7lUdpo2Pkg7IKPiSrgDtzhiL0LcvoMDYKx 2CdIvQvcNpBJF9WnHpLjdfAKF8CdAnOfQEexoa7J8ZzBCfPBH4xeG75Jdbfmp4FDmP7KISRQJnbv nLr4Ki0zQpa47GsCfYe/A/7XkEKIxEqDeB8wv77BBf3ejbfsFXav/RSKZlKoCC1AcpRKQ9u3YFJO KwwFDI8/6pvrRtkdbRqMALt1GaZMZtlYMxfB1kidz7I5gUy5sr643RdZG+WeLzqpHgTLFmvyqPOp CkX6wv+AHlyORQjeBoIu1o+8DQhhNa7pb2M/oJAGIwR73EXlXQxsDD7hFfWZK6QowdQRhX457n7C AaOiWJZVZSqri1rVZU7ICTqLFveU7wFyogM/qPYpClXww6e4NyhDoRQrjM6KjPcW9ITjRoIe8ok/ k9uZO2gMFcTERtwqMvzgoajuvyUrBPeDbYdr43sijO1vfBSJdKjvP+y5cpk+f7719Y/I8U34Z1xv 2RmFIbCBjTpA1AzAzJMvYCxQSA8jTqNl+JkOdfHw5IKHxaiPU8SjCX15qHtQti9l6zN0o7uqo7WZ rq2pqTjRLDX8+OBWfF2Oa6KHp9TZJXzDSpIYTwYOfOtCRuggPRLYZL+Z3Jp00N9PERLinW5LGY4X vFDLX7/ePDQE0106PiJPaU5qy+5i24xP9XdevtifEBSRmOAUrSD2vJIgV1PuUYR9u8NIgMLrwgex 31J3blU2XaWJo8cbByLoY+cTnnxLEqFXv0j+gnryYV37FXqoYbC7tVfaOVh7/jJ5K+GK37AitDe8 1qFCKvsJ4V03H/yDvJl6IXhIcd3ZvFfQoQTDtWE2DnREaEZUqj2KjDS6V3ey+zH1YDjS9dCxiNWB 4ZPyZS9OxKSEguW8w+NNJEG6F+59eLI7J7GZJjJSEvJSqfT8ivoKrlJTBe7BsTBmMyUUjxdiRNE5 pv8xifRBTw5ohxVEsbufaN2lYvHpLJNPE+p6pqqaPFfXOdal+OxaZVl7q3RspPk8+HkKAf9MsBPw 9WE2TgqitqA8O5OMDEs/fDCs7UqewrAzpz42knTxDtvt4dfQm6Ag+poG6s9Srw3GHAvPSD4aTe/3 LShKiJFGBOYEWJHEwC9o3y96KAGdkhNDwa7Nhyg7UVrTxMhQ8w14wCVmT4XNCuJi3YmWe9SDniQv mnjrraqWR/T52vbqa/0Oz4y8ouNzAnOkWd5HCgDqsXz8QyjgU++8Xd16nyY0aVyxtkAqe5RQ1585 QhH3PLYNCHrUku1h9sdoAs29c+3BdySavuhvACftXLRTmO3YEHTJSdEW5xAZlxoVYUz4jvqMJXTs fc/o+q2Bi5d+FVZ/YUSUnijtaLyF9BHssp+2v+bwZBWSIbnR1m9s76x6BPbojmX7hGlhFWH1scBJ nsJMU2HN9hMHX/eBAWlhxjPBTTBcEWzrpogNyzruThLakJK00tRGr56gU7GXwu6mfV4kJST6iQYj 2E3inEQEq3UkBiISa68TordW7yP9a8uvPP/uis6PV57bXdH78flP8v8+8vzUfx3BN7vLhYcT84RH 4/MMnpu+uAnU+DwE/w1erHxxXQ6/5qIHE3MNXpiOyJ834ujRhLGBoTUy+QzEzxw0MxMtykfzZ49X oiVoClo2J1r25PnbaIO82L0oM7NQWpDpUGxNpTlzXBDtyRVxOSXSXI2yvI4sG/fkH7Cs5rqxMj6C caAOYByawtZq+6WCOaaJ5oM9yWCcVbOqYjIKC8nkNHE06C5NWys3QHVgxcLiHLOEDcm7Uv39nc6G DgWe9Lj7+eA3Hcik7mn551o0VzqK5U/EGKhYJatYMpwBXtz8Ma5kWHGvtLeipXmwv+Z6GTKK1ebz ceVSppWt6yfHl+PvcB2aXoUsWnwi8HocMZcoriSO1kRzEe7khCt+HFCVFAWSaAyQDyZsHS+Rg2s9 VZiCCTP14dcc+GW4CU1j0covkbT768GvO9EMcL0XzX4frahDK4rQ4lFk9h1aN2eXr+xSLsp+3iM3 xTzTuBJQx0a4ZqCZO0uhn7GeWkbZQCMjXJWWzURTK2uwZq62pFEhbMVK0risVBLlT5jJVem5bAAl VGL+kZwmnhZm4pq+Fujga4xt5NirVHpORl5WoTQW47NZJZclVW7xAeGXXchyaXSNQDeXlHPdvHEn 38SNldRyTVwbLw3H0wuVkXGZXKmjosmrLEZzVMoMdTAd1JPh0ppWur2+qvM0+RH+QRnLvlEmRdPx w8X5jEPxqY4zfW3NdTUsW1EqnfBHO+TRTKoqSQFOGvsahSqx2xWsuoeWXYpV17PsFRIw6EZWy9cp 1FnhzDEKXC+vBI6PpjUpXFoUiVbEyJF5KHCBzDL2uSV6JFcmZDB+lGCPhSdxGmiWxCVGki+ccdVh g0g8l8lRxSnQdkzZr758m3w+9WM8WtDNjfDfJH19U//eQ2RoXoFvbh7HpykavUvD+P1SpqaSLaMu jmorO+grTZ3nH5NfRL9n8ZNi6IOet3uelrVqyrRVUsNjYKLko4XIHi3RGV+H1uvN+WR83XNTuWAv LMBtAieFqBmuHRvk7lJogZAvxGK2vnwJWNrrce3V0/x16rkEuzamLgYLZj1eHBjD2FGuGJI+8b3t f9HtuvE5pp0ZU0qRGa70DlcfpYStMJQX9uAkIzpW63BlkK/akprowvZBr6G0AMb16Bn+IYU+F96X o82YYGBz064n+JylsWCDGW5Hi3XGm9BqPfTG+Hm5YICv8N0cvyJzUNhi9FXf5ydvdGfuj/J09fcI 9EvZHDvmXZ06suuH0fujV6999fUQMuRQGI8GjLibXLumUypswUri+YQAEvZOsZJUC9bHP/C75fDY WJi58a7FkMulFcbjSYJE/oHvTZ939n2JjI22vO4ytOXcruVGAOv9uune62dvPPoR9O/TcFt/V0sL Y7QaP8+1lIwohM1YSTCX6ky+sMVXn0xEq9Hss2Xt/YqRnrpLZWiOQ2VU1ZEeKZvD5heTLkWBeXmK vIJkZSh1OEvbTBtKdHV0jM3H6WnL2Ol/CrqdEcNq78weN/k/ymlmtqBh5xtYsZhiql5t+YqYaVOu TL1CXJk27cq06dy0WYqpBrXVrs3TZv9X5pwzMsm6l6ErE8kWyT7JYYm3JEKSLlFJqiVdktOSO5L3 JV9L/qlD6JjorNXZp+OiE6yToFOoU63ToTOic1Xnvs4znZ91dXRn6prortO10PXSjdDN1FXrdupe 031H9++6z/Wm6Mn1lv7vYA0h8x0dtxudsBtPxA1lvgETdgHjdhOAXwPqMG43bgc/CFnLKC7TQjlm iCZGdcYTR/XY8SVy4ndiPPG/9F9R0P5PdSI1bjdZ+Taa9upGO2j6O/Xqzkny5a1/1P713h2js2FY me+/bnhV0vLXErhL5jvZv1gvUi2EeNkxCq8jPuYEvJwA7/Sq8Ork40GhnVjorR8gTB/Fjr+8GJ6H YBWCD37u9x+GH+ujaR8L07Cnr67/q+CpPvFUf/TjAOzjyW/D5/mT1xcvL1D74tjL3p93/z4YEYCm j+Jn505eiJCPP/74KXzEbx2CffVLpPXEtULOo4Lzq7USnAOQ8x9rhZzFtULO4ksmQhUs4J8oQMPE qVCJa4bSXy3gv0iULq7SKxo6ermIf6In+33ZYLY4kjihkzfBWOkBMJ+qyUV92TUs4p/oP/oWl1m8 V+9V7b91ZCekT67MZE+/1119+UJ2gvO/6mBpYRyZ7587flX28ple9S+WwXDAEC+f5ne6hQB+B65H 6RC2hLq/Tvn/n01rsEzctEaSNZK9EhdJsCRekifRSFolZyQPJd9JnusY6azS2a1jp+OpE6aTpqOG 7dqpM6ZzHSLQn+n8qDOhO0N3vu5K3U2wYe11j+qGwpZV6dbo9uie1b2j+57u17rjEJU21lupt03P Rs8NotOxerl6JXrNeoN6lyBC/ZHed3oTEKOeq79Yf53+Ln17/WMQr07TL9av0u/SP61/W/+J/jP9 H/VBJBvIDEwM8g00Bv0Grxs8MZjApmIKiF/bY/5YClaAabE2bAj7APsa+w1fgpvju/FIPBMi2A14 H0Sw38A/wb/HBeksKS1dLd0jtZN6SoOlCVK1tEbaJR2R/m2KZMr0KSTEtLdATNtpiv+UmCmZU9RT qqb0Tjk35faUJ1OeTfl1qt7U2VMXTjWfajHVaarf1NipWVP5qY1TL099OPXp1F+IOdMLp49Mv2Mo M1xqaDvjwow3Znw44+eZB2a6yAxkrrJEWR5EnN+UfTJn1xynOffmvCsvlA/Kr8rvy/8m/0KO5lJz V8+1mOsyN25u7dxrc5/M/WLuL/P058nmmc6znec9r3pe+7w78z6Z972RntFMo+VGbkZhRplGJUaN Rn1Gp41uGD0y+sDoB+PpxrTxWuOdxoeNjxmHGacZFxtXGbcbnza+a/w34y+NfzH+H3IaaUyuI3eR tqQb6U9Gk+lkDdlJniNvk++RP1N61DxqHWVJOVK+VBSVRWmpJuoqdZ/6G/UF9fN83fmG8xfMr5rf OX9k/vX5787/aj5agC+Yt2D5gl0L7Bd4L4hakLWAWVC9oHvBmQUPFry/4KsFvyn0FTMVJgozxXaF tcJdEaJIURQqKhSdijHFLcXbis8VP9M69Cx6IW1OW9BOtB8dS+fQGrqJHqRv0m/Tn9O/meibzDFZ arLJ5ICJq0mQSZJJkUmlSafJmMktk3dMvjD550KDhfKFSxduWnhgoetC/4XxC3MWahY2LxxYeHHh 3YVPFj5b+NPCF4umLyIXLV+0ZdH+RUcWBS5KXFSwqHxR+6LRRTcWvbHok0U/LBIWE4vnLV66eOPi 1MXqxV8voZd4L6ld0rnkwpK7S95f8sOS/1qKLV24dN3SXUsPLz2+NGpp5lLV0uqlXUuvLL239IOl Py/TWTZn2cJlG5ftX+a8zGdZzDJ2Wf2y/mWXlz1c9vGyH5YJy6XL5yxfuHzj8r3L7Zd7LQ9ZnrQ8 bzm/vG559/JTy68tf7j8/eVfLf9thc4KwxWKFWYrtq+wXuG+ImRF4orCFaUrWlcMr7i84t6K91Z8 seKXlborZ6xcunL9yn0rD688tjJsZfLKgpXlK9tXjq68sfKtlc9W/mqqZzrT1MR0nekeU0dTP9NY 0zxTrWmz6aDpZdOHph+b/mD636umryJXrVy1dZX1KrdVwauSVxWsKlvVumpo1aVVD1a9v+qrVf9c rbd65mp69ZrVu1cfWu2xOmh1/Oq81drVjav7Vp9ZfXP1m6s/Xv3t6nEzqZncbJHZWrO9Zo5mx8xC zVRmTWZDZrfNHpt9bPaz2Ys1s9csWbNuzc41tmvc1oSuSV9TvKZmzek1t9e8teaTNT+tebF26tp5 a5es3bh2/1qntX5r49bmreXX1q3tXntq7bW1D9d+uPbrtb+t01lnuI5at2Ld1nUH1jmv81kXuS5t Hbeudl3XutF1t9c9Wfds3c/rXphPMZebLzQ3M99ubm3uYu5nnmieb15i3mDeb37e/Lb5Y/On5j+Y //d6Yj21ftX6resPrHde778+Zn3O+pL1zeuH1l9d/8b6j9b/ukGyYfqGBRtMN2zfcHiDz4aYDRkb VBtqNvRsGNtwfcPjDU83/LhhYuO0jfM3rty4eaPVRpeNARsTNuZu1G5s2Xhy48WN9zZ+sPHbjcIm YhO1adWmHZsObfLaFLEpYxO7qX5T/6YLm+5t+mDTt5vGN+Ob52xesnnDZsvNLpsDNsduzt2s3dyy eWjz1c0PNn+0+ZvNaIv+FtkWky1mW7Zvsd3iuSVsS9oW9ZbaLb1bTm+5veXJlmdbft2qt1W2dfHW dVt3bbXfenRryNbErQVby7a2bh3aenHrw63vb/1xq7Bt6ra525ZuM99muc15W+y2om1127q3ndp2 ddv9bX/b9uW2X7f9z3Ziu/H2ZdvXb9+z3W67z/bI7Tnbue0N23u3n95+ffuj7R9u/3r7P3bo7Zi9 Y+GONTt273DYcXxH9I7sHeyOmh09O87suL3jnR2f7/htp/7OOTuX7Ny403Kn807/nTE7c3aW7Gze ObDz4s77Oz/Y+e1OYdfUXeSu5bs27rLc5bjLe1f4rvRdyl0Vuzp2ndp1c9fbuz7f9fNuye4Zu6nd Zru37bba7bU7ZHfS7vzdZbs7dw/vvrT79d0f7f51j86e6XuM9yzds3GPxR7HPd57wvek71HuqdjT umdwz+U99/a8t+frPf/Ya7B39l567+q92/Ye3OuxN3Rvyt7CvRV7O/ee3ntj71t7n+391ULPYqbF Agszi+0WNhaeFsEWCRYFFlqLZouTFhct7lo8sfjS4td9evtk+0z2rdu3d5/jPu99kfuy9zH7GvYN 7ju/7+6+J/ue7ftp3wvLqZbzLJdYmlvutjxk6WEZZJlkmW9ZZtlsOWB5zvK25VuWn1h+b/lf+/H9 c/Yv379xv8V+h/1e+0P3Z+xX7i/f37x/YP+5/bf3v7X/6f7v9j8/gB+Yc2DhAfMDFgecDvgdiDuQ d6D0QOuB4QPXDrx54NMDP1vpWM2yWmhlbmVh5WTlaxVrlWXFW9VZdVudsrpp9abVp1Y/W+tYz7Je aG1ubWHtYO1lHWGdYc1a11v3W1+wvmf9gfW31uMH9Q/OPDj/4JqDuw7aHPQ4GHUw7aDqYMXB1oPD By8ffP3guwc/t5HYTLdZbLPOxsrmmE28jcqm0qbN5qTNRZs7Nh/Y/GAj2OK2MlvadpXtFltL28O2 x2xDbRNtC2y1to22J2wv2T6w/cj2G1t0SP/QnEMLD605tOPQoUNeh0IPpRwqPlR1qOvQ6UO3Dz05 9OWhf9rp2c20o+1W2+20s7M7Zhdhl2HH2tXYddidtnts99TuWzvBXmovt19hv9/+iL2ffbR9un2x fZl9q/2w/WX7e/bv2X9tP+5g4DDbgXZY67DTwcbBzSHAIc2h2KHcod1h1OGqwwOH9x2+cvjnYeyw /PCSwxsP7z/seNj3cMzhzMPc4YbDA4fPHb57+G+Hvzz8q6Oeo8zRxNHMcbujtaObY7BjsmO+Y7lj s+OI4xXHe47vOj5z/KeTntMMJ8ppudMGp71Oh52OO0U5pTmpnWqdep3OOd11euL0pdOvzhLn6c6k s6nzFmdrZ3fnEOdk5yLnSuc25xHn686PnT9z/tlFx8XQhXJZ5bLVxcbFwyXMJdVF5VLh0uJywuWS y12XJy7PXH50geywI3OPLD2y/si+I85HfI7EHMk5UnKk+cjJI1eOPDry9Mh3RyZcp7kauy5z3exq 5ermGuCa4Jrryrk2uQ67Xna95/qB67duMreFbmvcdrjZunm6hbkluxW4ad1a3E64XXJ73e19t2/c kDvmPtd9mftmdyt3N/dg9wT3XHfevdH9hPsl9wfuT92/cx/3MPCQe6zy2OJh7eHmEeSR5FHkUeHR 7jHqccXjnsd7Hl97/MPTwFPuucRzo6eFp4Pncc8ozyxPtWeNZ6fnac/bno89P5f9ZtaPZmAXhxn1 SRrhuCooWO1BEaZYYAYnJn+twks6a7lW6rTghBFmmEcEXxJCC9PxkoEe7iZF7MUSMzgum3bAudoG roV6ghFW/1b0BkZ4YzHpXEkqLSzFiW+wxnKWqaI5nmU0tOGhSDwya7JuBU74RuHHw/iSWFpYiJd0 D/BnKCK4DhviW0vaFcJa0VFPCiEzg8HpkGDnBxjlKI0W4srwMLUbJUjKIf5ggKszCthwCh42Mpfl 02k0dyJGfup6LJoLN72sjRDBlT8Rzq+aCuX6XEM1101BuINAU3BldAEL/ZphroUsBIsINBVXRWcx 3pQwB/POErEZAinw4tBYxosS+rVwzxKsuJ9puUmi2zBY2Nyn8VswFN4h/yR+M1Qq8dNcP9+pUCUm Mf4QQHmE9bcz6lZa3cI09UH2lAnEovr4s1SPGBWYfP9+/hQ1JlQBtQILS+L4GFoTz8X7QNsVuKa3 l++ikB1UrsdKovhoP9I6EsKqG/FIdZgqXIFIFCe/be+IGQoumEcoL4Jua3BiYip+kElWRinQBox4 sRICumHKCJFQDqgH70PC05+KiBerfq/fhBHhVgM4Ojb3cfh+jIg61Isjq7lvRh3ACI0QJ/fEDxQb XMeJi6eP4oLpRflR/4swAVgjfq6BUXbQYHcSwqoL2Em+raRJxPU0yXxCOEkkC4da8EauVlMHADha FokLy7bJ0bJwCOQQ//5gIg1PvR0rHmAgy49wUQeI9FpM1cp0tJGEa/wkrrgcLznRwQGILb4y4EjA RqMDEA8k/GI4TQKtieKivMgXcpz4N+4mglK5kgR6QOiR8w1VbB9FRAD7JNB8PAdAvTCME1FZrLgA sVwa0OuBzuE4SCkr1+eby9keiogvYvlsmk9jCyF3MoHNUWcq+KoytoMisphoJlcB8BKrIglVYqTI LmHY8XBOkwghhKQ0JoJahfmmcpoUIFMzGIA572IhyRwMT6gzi9lEajWWWMzymUBmF7Hx1BosTiWS hurcQiC3YvGTJMEqi9kC6qRg3llaqxnSGhN8dRnbTn2MtZex6moA+jubuJMU5Aicr2HUTTRR08Ay JXQpK+5DormSYepodSNb0U0S7Y0sU0ZXQE0JTXQDHNutUMdGi2zbwzXwjQp1ZiaEPYke6LeZFrdV ej4bBXSDyNA/48qkAjaIIga4RhHHXYeVpHCpkSQxyLXyHQpVfCITRhGjbBXfBB1ls5DPdKqJAcj0 jw1GjPG9JT2KPzibGGtj1MBHU3BVTDoDMa1rTYyyj0bLYY+mQkoHcb2PUQ7BXseVwcGALhI3uH5N D+y0cLGxxe3wtr1npIMTbXKi82DV8cod0nF5n5y4jhSXYZvUIVKH+MB6zOfudiRFU4yInWiZsBQt Hf8FLZ5NrMY0mWxeJFl0HE9J47hMOqQnsT6s8YiN0UBqd8pgxLlbRvtxvr6Na6LOHT+MpYAwzALR FtydUB/caOxhcyK1K204wnj4usFeaNYKgrQVywkuTE/wkrKqNFZJEWY439zMdVDoEEZsxrOVquy8 AhhIcaotqye/PrPVWAUrpNJIDXfgXE0N10xVY44RrdHVSTURxo2VpVnaFD7J+Ou5hA8erI4pClGg XRjRibWCbKmjvwJxmMgkURZn72DdVeKiP8PVaRlMAuUAQuYDXJ1fxKRTJy4IkJf4OdSkMfGU8BBL TAEAmQYm/xI/xZZp2hWquEwGRGEZdjxORN/5ZC4qiURLo+SETRgOrFqSQgsrccImGvdP4EqSRULT 3s33wssSthF4JAh/2Csr8ZLmWq6Pgmh5QIfBx9gh1CS/hhG5I9gtAExhvZdgRHEL1sU1AmesxfgU LiOGJM5+Iz9+5iz2d/3jp89ixOW/4co2pqlHjMqd4Jo1zQpVQjwTSEHWdmCy+GyaZC45ggQAgkAk rgz0A2U28RmIXwXWWs0wtXQPVCzDVRmZTCyVj2Zit7kW7YBC2IBpw7kkSD6emYPHJfCwNUUh29bJ t1OGaD2mPKk+BVD+cbj5D8IfiAK8Hvi4RsHkZjEZkOCHZU5qHS6dy8oiBTWeyqQymQquSsM2UMS4 E34BGBO2QHIc40oREHYOgnDI5FAE3HsskRNV33IYt4UbhvrFoGWH+CvUKTQP8tyW4pqWWq4TskvN QOovE6NDfCdVDYlE7qkJhSnqHoC/Cdht3rAEkXRJAJfsB6rCHNOGcvEe5AsbEMJARHDxLqQwKxuo 9WJVgjv5wg6SW4KVkFy6HjreiGnDuCRXEtJZoU0S7qn2UQa/rCoCIkwZpECbsOJBpucCdK/EPdT+ ysCX9erfG6+EfkrxY0xiMcSoRU1jAZrETwlqyRyIfbgjE6METt1wclzAbp1QK3sg4S2gAu+sY1RN 9M/nPHHijrDDAROM9e8Iex1g9YyFA3J0oA8yPgzHlS+zWMP/lMXaAGl/EX/KYgXh9q9k198z//7P ZFd3JlYVpuC7erlTFOGdx0LgDbg7B9KZA0GjJNHCEpj1VjAKiKAEMSoHCiA7liSC8lk+FbQDmx9C EmHpk5sikgvzJ4kIIKCPSC40gERGIfJ/FUzWQmgvVqwViRgmQ52q4M/UsJ0UkcykqNMUXF8zGFGE 6hbL1lP3R6o6uun+nqYrt0lCXcd09pLoY7yDqwMJTKivsmwN9fcLTZd7aYI/zuWFkRPBuC8TB6Eo gs/jcjNJk9Ttwa4KQhPGRR0jhSzckwlTQWy+JIpLciEDM/HA6EkjphEEQwv9Na7OygHBQHS1Mup6 +u+4OjuPiaOIPr65pHkyGJfMp0SBEG/lS6rptoqKphESZeLEmU5GBaIbx5UR0Wpvirg6rFZCvsli SI0JUTtTxF2uCYyeRZgmlIs7RhL3uT5Nl0IZkcjYUsRbXGtJv0KYipVEcHGQi/Q211wCe5EQ6XgL 8j8nyv6eWb25jk2DT5HxtsJD6fsUhpknC+pjr06mv1ek1oVKISd1679lyBNrETUeiYizaIEO5H4v vYEWoRVI8QZarjcn/fmW8Wo5sQT3UoeKPA8JJX1M320SeeKjbK2qS1GVVJPUkFw7VtpQ0ys9jPM1 pWwbdQsbKGfVNbS6iq3sJk+0wmES2byZZgndWA9Xzlcr1Ll5YJEewhLBQsihbXC+spJtoUYwmVRi luiIy0wkZgnATrlQJTsoMeNryqHT24k+WGKhWGqN81UVcMMbvw9TzZR3kzKtxOxE+yZ8Q0seOobk Z0pb2xUtjTV9FVelMl9bM/fKhIrIZimPXallmWZQ60xLJ4lUeBfXLGrdxETRyqAxNFt/GIf2Dk+C MMFiWC7TwRwE23hki5vNjXLpxW+Yy9fiUKhNwmSSmdp2vIut5KsUMkmLVp2Xz4ZS7lhCAcvniW8F D9lK9SR6YwmQlJ9HB+IyyWxtUltmc8pAF+TvNaukwBSq9Exgql/wU9UQGm3KzIEshwypzMTaviGL V7fGS9k8likiffBUNlcVrOA7K9jL1OsQYtVqOb6iSqPRaEtLpYjE0uNZtrBQiqInQuVOZnhTe2lF VYO2UFtQnSo9eVWeW8eyGY1VLWV1FS1SYXae/NIHeFGKMj8/OadWWZJRL432kldnVeVW5ORnFRZk pEpli3IXCA+RsTwxFAfjhc+n+VJeU1otZSs1rJZCE4KzfAivzi7Pr8yUfov2ymWSvQtCugxOYrJZ kgVCYrZcsIqHE0UdQqU8H09jC9TJip8xWYtkAdMAVhTkKM7G1EGq3LxiaVFOhHo1tTlP00rLZkoW XMENTfWROlRQY8L7kAUZKeimuAfsSA/LTc9MQ0YCZqQp5/iymnNfnfj8JDKUGk7aiqLCXYhrmutA H5wRpmPEGjy9MbsmsUka90/5zfcd8PT6wrLkRqnwMeqXD08QQdjzXShRXuwaZuJremZjx54BYSUi bhpF/hT3yO9Z37t1p1rvVrTzWk2p1HAdXseXsJ2cNA8PZqLUiQrCHOdba8GKHojPxSISOT6R3obz be2gyqvifDDnLI5PpsF2kTka5vLNTVw/hXQTN2JRmRyfIrZsbhSLZmD99QyYi+oGpraLPDNsj8vK LufuHs1GhcjzhralT9HbWnei6q2E0iI+pVTK1jKNzSTi8P5XLBvH+FKC7xkw+ccaGXU/LSsblqib mKZe8k28D6zSZoU6IQnsPVnZ6dzOiUi5jaDA25uqKhsbK/LL8hoTpWrkIb8qUFhiO8tm1VXXl9fU 90kFmyj5AyTF85OL8vIyU+rVfHK91OuIvD21NlerzM5RqWPTpNb6l/Ha7Oqc6lSO4VW8SjphND4o b6otL62qlMKJjLzs4uLcHGnNTrmwzRdtw08LVXLB2xd5w+bGcseEM3ImBbggTwrRH5kWy2WqGW0N iUIwZZoyr6hImp2doBY2UEsieG0WXVCi1taRMpOuXEg/MR/Xyk9BL90SRPhjE/QpYLwQSbwwrQM3 3AIZGonF0Qq0DlN2MM3nSWSCE9sw30TR0xFmwG9QBwlKaLASU3YybRdI0RHbBevRIDq5+rBE0Wmi obfnX0vUB1PbJIqLmm5yaFgIDRoGkVEjigywGsMoQYqBsoNV3Q0cUc91UR8mQhGxRx9J4+DHRD1a LCcscR7slGbqI8zbLyzVIr4rtbyoKUUahGcwWeAVyXQc1/ANFewZ6ok1BsSCmEqsha3gKxWgcdgE 6uik3Mujj+IaEK9NVB8mwyQLkgPweNiXubQbSF1RQI4mR2IpkxLVC0q0IHsuYq01DFNNqyvYyhZS ZixZ0Nct0DHVeDMIrUow0UT1dhRLAlmbT3tOCu/J3k0kC1L8cVGO5dBHgIklCzTV5eA3nUr6fQSP f40AuR31r0bo6wYWrsld4NqXA4ewVrSVjrYpStK5Ah7E2ADLllJXO7WQR9JdX9n1Ovl8E/4m16o9 qRBWY2CaxduRL0zxNKUyJS+D53MVyWXFfFaptAbrAxeqcVJet5NoDd4NtjC4Wxnp4CQWC1vk3gJ+ EsSQtqgiq75WW1Jbpy0sUVZlSk+MyovKCioKKsqqSkqrmqRl+qGdeWmqovwc48KywtKMuphoo1FQ 0qJEihfC5MdUDLuMMi2G/HxRCHX34DlMrjpf8XcM1NECppwprydls+YvEKY+kCO6R6DxaOQtR/N6 hHn4syXyqrzS4sq8/PyCorxCqZCKPpLXV5WWVJRLkQzLzVWpsvOlgsRLnoBDH9Gu7aA8Vv2AqmPk 3TdjcBv0rTwlFs/J4rhc2h7n68rA1OlMTsCiclg+iwZvqqGSBf7cjvVUsuoG+jGuzsljI6nolg6s upFhKum7uGhu51LRze1YVxULfg60Sc8Cgx7yOeMyRJbeD3BUDfhkE5UfyrVBXNwh8sVq3IqJKfZX oNVY8SjT9YR8vgJ/wLVDlpShJa7tbedOU+NLhb3yCQPs8smOtuFzUiaHLUwlQZwzecpscZupapny FrIKh+lh2hUX3DuSrgVLhXcn1siHEBuMywSJwKDrcgJGr6sFO649JQ77/T25ykaummpLTsQIUJYt TeDxfZi0ENwjPKtImVCQzfGZijrXkkSNp5StKAOdw2rhQAY11lVSUUt31lf3XCFtx8fl3T0VVW0D naGV2R3xUkE5AXniOHEIiwQfDNwugNDs8HgmVTQre+thTxCHsZrK0pLa6obaEk1FadAJI3VmKhNK CbMwbSnPl5bxPMvxnJTVcHAkBaYxqwCmOralB6tq+H2qM2Gqo5p7sIY6ESF4OdVxFGBShCseyKSL +UgLMVU7U3+WvIoTHlhVZWVlVXV1jUZToikF31Wrdb1nJCZ3AfA2C+M1LFuiLauEDVIuLG8ySvYJ On4scB+abXQ8alGMMCu97Vh1eK37bbEBJwVDqskqBI8DNwlkmugBNfNtVD8WtSTWw9m+x6EmqMbh xKXartZbUsIH7K0qLQAOqzDCH3Rjvah1TLD+ZkbVTF/Az4cNpL8VVX+rdqTr5tZW+36X84EDcQMZ J6VMXhhgLKBEvSHPCWCyObimswZW7wRm63w8Zl+09A38HivqF1VqgshjKzDIGdOA9R/NRfmTExx+ VH1UBd7M7K+G3ZAUA/FTNUSOe+FtYY3hNWH5HJginBSApIQ4csIU92JiVIC4TcNUvUwviGQpTgRg XBtXytdKhcUYn8UVcMlSEKZQVq6plgqLIKUNypIgt40IxaLAR4T0N11c0yHqXyIM55oquFoKGWNE LO530q/b/sQSYaoRkYF5Z7NaAHAVOJEjSm1I7ZucwCbRwVDjUS+5pLOTG4VZWhLUhXVytaKsScsU +QOkegPeUy26Al/i6swCEbIZwU4D7gI4DBj3iamgam1fw4gLmMwlV9jghQuk/gVhtxdmeB8f4wZE dx6M/ig+3J+0TcIjM7mSNBocWuIBfuWlsw9wbiSX5kbapOGxSZOOL4AG3Y2wL9pEAPBtbLhHdAzR UlwZG60Gc9UGGwSHv0UhZkzGc2lcuFSYjxEf4eqkBGCthI5R7BIYGO3wvMSn+BA0bVWoIiJEeOjv uCopC344drZjcBz6eg+jHBEzDpVBYSLW/T1+lq0RW0fHMYBq/YxdrGXVbTQYFw0d5BNwuOph8QlZ zHgNOp2LZxcpk5ISNaWRirpQbbomXKq+xbGNcCbpi6uq+BSAIsDE8AE0D+BhEAhsJqvOJ4VP8AA4 cQALt3QS5QVRU4GdBscXJhPeLz4FMvPRp7hsIpctZyuaSGKOo0R2+BMkex4qJ/xqsW5wwloVwHkl CTyczc5yx8U8SsAK5gMQLOZREgOf4WdBFIJuqmVqG8hbeB0n4hLEsyIsm8lRZynQYnCjJZPvfuIl ah6q9gTUHEp1fp8RY0A0MPwO16kFrwwQkTAuzpEUsFwoBv8uMplxpoQerJmv0jRMwrgZXDaXKhXq MRfgStg5OCxgF3cdwG05mGTtgHQICzFNDJcAfiMyxpUhkYAiTazGjoRzcOpDLFInpwKqKDhjwSni DifAQlGGe0LmplBcBk9mgikb2SqwbPThERbBesVCpioITeDAdAA74xjpI6gww+ClK+tIODGB1k5C gDaUE/zehY8A4tgL6FUSwC1w8JhA1vgQ4DWiRs0VudwXC08VzVngJxGgHJdgPYBENtEf4urUdCYS IJtp+A2uF6ZDFRIDQxPjGwDCadd0i2qceL4Mv882lIwC0JjMRFEwY8TzHdgZwCIh/57Gief2cPqC UQ6KwCTx3B8H9uVbAK9KA0uWECT4MXWEEvTRWgBL9DCfNE4TSfNRXCR4yYI+1s1VaAAsB1kGWBbf WAkYM6D9A6Us+OqTRS2lLMg3B6wHnE/AOyAoEQnvkkxrIrloL+hCjgWBQoWYCwYwjrH+XWGJPSZr /wR+g3t7TER7AIuBczF8Rws3SMGpMAJERUlvPXeRuhEBBI0BipWZRqa4NuGQL8tViIsJxbg3AEKh L++mIThUw92mbqZDDQQwICZ0g4LzdSJy1VjP9VKN8Bsw+Q5R6IzAb1O4oQ7Kq+H3GlHYZWWQhYJb Gd7AVUMYAGI8mnQ2Lx0ef40IVaW6k9YZk7iVBtQGrykr15aWVQh72wHo+j3sYRMIDTbgEepQFQQE ZCMXYtFU6H0TFpPDaZJoPowL9xaP97qpXVV+CkLYDBGSUFEELxq7HIfmQlNINAa8LplMEVLw40d5 jT/MpjUWk8pxEDEAzogihU1wUzgARYRwGGvlKiGbF0A4Pp3LT4ZHjce8IyePE0E23MR0/Ig6EmIq msFucSdM1OM+QIMRbgpnPYZxByYKHNvfvj/h9XdAwsAmeRmA2Sia8ENvwXEsSa1ElZLPulMCHEDY 1PMphohoec8n0bjg+0/5X+hg9L2c8Ay/hCNybr8nLJmP5xkcmfrIz1z2AaViBymU2x0/Ef4uJ4K9 h/Bzv8i9+88BwCpU4A7xIq9pErh0wFcRXiFHZcIOQHcNowXzHhxdm4tsokHcAlCKNuuhO2CwoaNX UM6XyPobQYYWGkVEBscdiVnlKSzwFOZESpEjDrCOaNvuw8DYioAjYF/hvpqo0nRFRUxjcnuuNPn0 JSUKoVDH45pbI3TncNWlKmRkXxFUY9cvXVvkkZuiiM3wLhR2UUJwruYigHfT0Sz8XDcjIkmAK//l eY8ET0Ygl0Gk5yR/mSLc1H4qYMc5X495I0NM3cE2QBzLXR3zKlzUw3ReB5qJBxWt6aphr1MA6RGv wpjA8C/DmJ5wTgTCmsZ4SX8fsDDh+TLMCefSJlma8ASBHkPzoVz0UXJiCGJok8xwVH1c3Angf51Q n7tIEl5MrBhNW42pupnOa/AnNOBRI8W4mwjjnqOIY5NRQ2Eq7Lk2bgzwRkCso8Re44+ShHfKqyFE mMwbeAa4ebcIQLVfIYnjIB1A3E/B+c52UNiEL9wJzxMhbvWJVtyO8VdFKgi/aK4knOYTuYgAkvCD V45WaLpbxXCYf7YYDOVT2MxgkgiejHWJuqO9GQJChAjgJ9LoPvgXRDiwBgD8caI8fHEU/wtNhDPx 6ngF19Yoapy/SJtICBYDwr8Ctn0DB9EwUd+D6FkyKQbATPlD/2saGmD7E1EJ4uaCvzSSl0QSUX+E ByZlBoTa/iXHkAEEGaLg6SETfvKhIMJJRIO9AOagDkDgHWJv0bkcl0cfnETWgIyddAFg40f4kL+F yYmMfA4CN3CgOyaFJJRhUWp36oUL5hjPaeHUmDIiEqLHEzLsKLAAnGIX0+9BI0mwiMmZIFRRMeog CiyNoFhRxxGq2AQG9GYM5g5+dpxIJ4shYR3MA/DhSJHOYCDLfyZ2LENcMkIFobIEygQLhRWEeJ+q jqluI9vwFq4RlCihambLR8gxfACs/XYgO5n2SyQ6iA/AAYVWoAeYzlFy3AQ/A2c1egD0TRa1kuB2 CtljjU0M00bLfpUQ6vQ0GALivD4AGAISo84Q/SUhCIsCV1cMKr4Mia/GIgGZS/+DtnkV956sB9vc FosEH1hsn5nPRlNu7VewrpfqhulnS98Rjy6/y5ZxXQqCq68REYQgrBcc7nqAnye11kQ2fogJAclK APvEh5NwqjOciRHxI+DIOIiaGuFhTIIqHmgIsfZSoLdfeniTdB+FgrGeSROG4JvLxPpVWP+kB0jw L3WdLdYLug7+QoUmgotyJ4UE3AXgbhDK/+bhEa8iHra4q/oobFBCG8PH+ZCZwDCOEAaGRWri+vh2 hTo9FQ6cQDy7GWwlkOirMT6Ty0kliRauRrRw1mCaDC5TpOtZdR8tc9MCMNLYQxKtXJ0G/Iw9YmAz Cxi4HXT1S+WVymWFkUQHmB0t0H0KWAUQPq0QO1uBwTmrfAgddEMlYFWTK0mAucG00D/iquRcNhjA dq5ejLYBix2ihM5SjOiHdYeekuPBWoH4aT1Xp1DB6oLpEon9hSZOAkP9YfAOAegO/kp8EpijxF9M 4WGwi9vAYIkEk5n4d/PozzQx2s2oemlVF9N2liTO8H2iRW8uphrEgHw6DwHZHlrdyjSPkMSFClbV Sv9hzREXWhlVtxj1V8dnikbTpWpWzHNoY+sfkJAGQVyGngfoXyYPz4J1LvoDvZPpHVFcihtJXG3+ T8HdwHDRXIdzG6/s08lYFoQUTmiGFcrIMAbOpT5gm0qGwOJLZCAJRFRhs0LA6ZxwWS1HVkApEiCV 3g/ECQTThX1P4bD/WO9kGokZTtRZlnlqt0rHZzbLiWamnG1QS1UdTOsYqEjZ6JU4NAVjGpnmNpKw QsZD3w1+dxJOEu5FxrPRF2iJsAQO0KjRUrgumTORO0dPIpuQjNs+J+X2R50jdsRUZZYUl2cfH/bt cRpYLUwzIuDvpix6Exl/iohP0Pw5a8eJLWjm98gIItC6fUivDFE6Z9D0YQTnUvXfRxK9Objk+Xx0 QN5xqN6ySZiDpo0ZRSDjpIdBT5tG68ca77c+Aa+6SjAE/94l40DsdinY8echUARMnpIKWD+x/hfP d9ve3/lF9eOON9u+5l5Lh0MuHe/3fjkbxf9jGMHBUbAz0Cx7pDcn+opEtjY797nFc2s5seGfqnvc p/vft7zbdrf1btOHu++6fZp31xtRa99zf633vf4vZiMFoj772efdfU9a/97x/ROk6/jtHAeTwTmS Q7OIXR8mnW+95Pmg5FzzmZaLx++63lWeKbwbOtJ+oe1my8OWW80PZl9HJjeeBd7vftbz7OYPl9HC OSZ6786ZNV9CrAdQsg0QRgQZRdswP4iqQTDOBNc01QPk3SP+PSZLfWQYKRhi40cRJSccAUkqBcTj S6xNI8JGRD6ezeQBpIUIcMmZilqyEieK8DBQweCIUjhRgalPsNoBEp3FifNg70eLYjsQC4nmONDJ SVxcGIRAceICQEs5LGiE/S0IRMUNnMmChA5qbRuYuXdwVVw8A6eZ/DFQvWK+xtsg2Os4iAeD+5BE EX/DR1/GqNOSGNjeT7GGapbR/p5y8Q0mm1cIog28NuJbvANQSvGQWIGYSfEjrk7JZkJA73SBE0QM umBoxtzwGwNwpEo//PoAJsyYeyQcMm6QLlZXJcrgc/B7ytzB8FBoMSAfCg8WWR8bHVKLeRGrYKtF wNYBrSSmLI1w3WIeRmIEvLFIj3FdvCgTRBr+IAYB4V1lj/rUPfL5On1CmIdFAkoMxkMsF3yEfAFJ RKAMo14WxXMhsGHBb9B0DPw/bZ15eFzlefavtMo5/vKmtAXPhMwQDQmrMZjEkGKWshmDTQwY27It b/Iia58ZjTTaLMs2hkiaM2ckJ6y2tVnWbm1e5UUGO8QUSCAQ0kKbXv2u5mvakO5N2mOuY7f9Pe+Z kUT7/TV6dGbOnDnzLvdz3/fzTGo42OvmAqfvMlq32PEnA1eAw26BVLtJGVupXb6CpxYb6yngI+Pi bDmBK7dmADC505QpRo7JaSPGKjBRJJSK2tEi4hEzYsXB8Pb+9uR4UGqf/8e/lPtbKG8t6ML+IKq6 /2WWWrGmiuzUoR57BDReTaeQAkFW80Djtrk1UQhGgh8Hpxs5+amWotDXTQUzOwXL1ZX7zaW8RNRq o2nUGnuH+V/4genc6B9/nJu8fOCHhvNAxPfMAFzIxo2nzFOf+sSo8GmWyssBjj/ifytvGdA8b8Kc +LUvb2JCjpSsw0t1i3+yZC1WjdyY8atzvr5c6B1B8U7WOd9Qrqzuq/ku/+ANnzyq0TUE/+d1nzyq sVWFzNbzPnlUR3PzDef6cz55VEeP55vuHf4tR49TCx7eZDj+Qd+p8EZDnS7ZYDjXDvvOlqzj+509 6RtZW2y4s2/EVmDO8Y2sKTYc83VfxnWFxcGzgy3HhVQsOVDdlsB6U6ULREvtKF/P576bVcxPz7U3 0CdK+mroCforzNJSAPFG9Lwa9LwO+RY2R1IyB2XUDKYkBknpERFDTN/i5XFzxNjVPRxQW6mCLJEO ES2DAwJW89Ef0Nfjdi0+K1xbKeT0aruKjbWA0zBY4nYNqXwRPoyGEPs5BaSqGNxTnwlwGwJyUpV2 IePvLsDkjDGlyhnX1ZwjFYkE3LgZSUQEv1Tw3x2hVG1yF5u7GL12hdybs1L7X0x2YvzyiLQhTbdW WlWJTSDkV5A3FIKvvSdkJZJ2IqTiVo1Vmm13vJrkdsStBqshO7VPYI6q4oJ2CnmS2ieksWo8Yg2k 2eluygivauq3OgCFN5mn7D7AAIi0Oo1A9exQzZG4rEERYzW3KgrErCyXeHNmTfJsUGSp64vtFuCh bP5M9JiRG5ZFVTVXVQjibe4HgKnmOh3sMIqBv4IVK2vgxJiamzAgAncTNVWsfpkFedqfxk1pQJvB ofYCZOpcreHsDK2QfzTiUZtrVOBg28nrEcOr5LhWvOX47ucRfW7XOvJujj+3m+P3GN5dngq9pyvs aa+cFzZoHBDVDR7usNoxRcwxewE8HcQHrb7DASeOaNgn+DlxyOoeCzg5WIW62AuV1bDdqgu6c406 fFpAAGu/tb8r8Bd60caEmPxuU7I5mGxOJK2g8raTXxtdmNz2g3H17vL3GS+dF/5HZrMRFaMr+Pfp 8CpS63hlwF1j8q3j6lAtcbs8N3D5K+ZqKwJfrr6f/J7Vmg3XtzcVUB37xDX3b9qYVR1UHfvTIVtI TVB53r13Tc/rp3p4MiQfraNGwZn9CeAwI6N5R4MVpS1Yl2UdDEHF92Io7T0o0JKgj6BfA+l/xQ72 gmwv/fuTuH0TB5MvnwmogeT3YQoTOJfYogbsDnHOldSw+TxppB19/wI+fU42sMEu4dLFZxeptoBi h7mt3dmJqhrQlsKOJdsIo7EwqMbYzUC5bJ0cGdPvnng1+SLgebxfvHz/bjbHZaSp8QEJf2s2V1RK eITEJ8PYqWPA4YPZiZICazOGQd6rVwyDsrGesHtbCPAxcOSk3QZqTj/tZI8FVm/utDpYPITIPSQw tRuYet7ub4HI07NFXei1pIPLbeyMlYJRf2B340tpjkZhKAlGofi8eaLebk1ah0OJ3uSBt0GC8ysg npzJHp9zf4V7PzvQjQPYfp2vwdE4cyKm+rqxBdaN1Q0D2teN1nK7ckvA3WuqW4zNzFZSYg/C9ATP IjhsLNtSXbT7LfePrv3/H//f/53+D+o/UEjOo+CJAEv7YBQu0QPkQRHe8ZIK7/eEud6uT1a1zhJT WU+nmMqWmhvJ1fGc3WKCmTaQFcdbZmk3WQ8L9wc0xzHzaPmF1bXArlwTcLH4HDZ/iDFnRPN/Y+ZF XJ2j+u93xIHXCiF/q3HNB+pDSVolgs/8kCPdYhv6ptESSwn9+1NzONWNW2/6Px/JpJTn8Py/MYYZ WeQMfB8V2yVp+TVTuEvLEZV8xW6vRhws29V6dS/YbW4DRsBhldjRNQG1q9DcCIkAJ4DCvXscP2GH XO9N7HW/Y44lXxNgtbtWsjFQfNpM+iUQ0zxhavp/ELgEWwuV6vliSWSk481hnYtibiUwRzlHezr1 UjTXOUJ8ILuZRLmYc241plIg5RSJ9sDiI85exj6mm3eT7TJL8FAuI24130p2sBg180FXAlFgdzte Sx4N/jODaZbRGrEr1gXcJNDp92T4VG8M4KQTdlfGFeOH63EDsKid9kRweBuvkUA6IeiA0aU9IQO8 QDsGew6zw/4lf8OXIa6MB3v5+w4jnx2RISInu8fIZ69Mn3mBsZUj6eC+mU+73yhsSrLZsrTJ9wnV 5xns9TkWpqmDdBDxpsCLoMdnDc9ZDduk3BVQ3psESgnzvGqaSG4eSZyAPqPN0YwnF3A8X+g1iFO3 aGaww1zFMloGnGiHexbjqWsZK/BTMx7ABQIVsWUDrOEQlvHil8365kZrp9Xu3natujxg5LH418lm lVsMeer3D+eWGGrbM0dMZ5n/nW3UBkTWw4Le4X89ssZQseW9prPY/3YMG2Ksr98Y1Hj9Z6aK9fcb /fARB0IEFTk9pnOX/0JFjqHa89cZa5hjCCJobwPO+3iDyvAGOV/1D7qPh4F54jLvbhX6fqGhxo8U mNucL/pGjxSZ6p3VTxnOQ2/45FH9eMWThpuV9ePlPJhZsLHur3yolv1Lj9x1AxnkNy9P+k7ZvbIP urPJNFN9XUIqPgtACoew25UD0pbTaYy7Ui10Xg4fuMxupW/WDWZqdBieX+V6nGOV/kpFUtJ6YeuQ iAAqlxlFHKTTRrsNe5lrVTeX0+bi5eQPg2ot7GI8O3V4f/ICPKYH8RmttGrZADnHy+YjdImmrjbw TF42MCDBRnhLdMjMABZe05u1LagQghO9WQw1SesTiSHRoqEybpg8YTSo8ngrZDTvBLCQm3BpspiF zJa+HiFGZZaggcSkt4YO6tKBe68ZtUqFLdqix75H7KstADY+x8D+JFeX790OPP4rAy6MQD6sL/AS 3nElflBNoTLCU52vkn6ofCAPoLLW3lkVeJaNvkE2+vT45Z5x/aDVqfHcor336dj5WKhWwatwoNvt XSBZT/8STtZ74XTsvbAA+BSXHKwqElCFYDOUDXJUQbqaWCRVFVMBb1kEiVcqH5rOyNqayqr4ZQ62 MflVCZ8dUcObw6UYhbl34iQeERxeypkwEVyFt+c1OVNp5kyijZVR/8B76noIVcZnJx1nlmlhKkPQ 6uIIFc6sIKn2VzByKI+F5MYJbShsLTdSl7IgrKj0UiES10tMCIXSL3vX77G7ddkHvbIKbZrE9EMY t/agZaY69sEMAHwbALJfNzxaXXm1Ae5XDY8sJ64XZtYwNuhBRLwjXbzD/ig4+aDVNR6geeARuwuY oRLlBQhzl181NtHMDuY2UfdCElr0AcO7RpXotTpOBJxHJadPwYJa+GVR/TZmaNbUZruGzf52TBHR RAEsZ4Vdwzi6HR90JBH1WE9YzpwplpPbwwq10eiHHxMWFaTJ8eWGgDVYTo/qd2YbJ3R1hEoN0LxG Otud7LISvbCghXZMs6ArsRQwrtOsaDzDinojXFcEid6l9mOywsilG+kosUp1hN4DhYnnSnUnk4mT IavXaj8sdObLacZyu707DpLEFNYV+guE9jpxBHuXJ1Uf3CA00ukYZjLsxR26KgRIKccHBZUCwtoB YYMYqOj2I5VY+skSA2El3sPdxm4s0vv08SGOeyfT34Ya4rr36+NenEYJ9eUCHqe2bO+rU5/btUf1 tyx0PfBijFQKhBerEfw49pq8ZzQrgfOTcBy9Hya1psKiVdYRcGxHZuP3dv1Ew27Z2I8CNNM1KfV4 IdSxbjFCw2rGtkkJynH2CdwLfLCqPUkOp0tcpIRFP11MjBwnRjDANz2FStIlLjNiffyUVzxWLv0G 1SmMDqBXefF2IXGmgIt8RdyIs/aAsKDh4gSgfQqbZA7CeB4OObfy4iKkEPXG4UQTpX+3m42FYSlL OM8Hobjmy2ZTuArFn2KaNnBzU3lU4Eo6iOlnvgnxy2UESAfqSUlhZvtbAO9c47qgumhLzzRpkPhM UAkEEmJ7V/JpIM/CQvr+OTf5x/iL/XlRGf1Yna/4sfeXUa+2KCyhn81yEZuluygq4dX+XndRzLhq +ZnCnsXHZt1I/0n18y1jVe+spcn/tU9O5PU8NjxL3Wys8YQ7JL55QIZyEV6/ZTT1WQcnAyLJ36lr 4SgMY2eWDaGKDlepTu2keUzYIMEbKPtvG9ZIMmnjwaJnVxA4myDBwvoDvfWJadXsIDFznzNqkJ0a QjhQBlgQSHZqhXRWnxoXD2sCO2g2FUtl4h17DaxfqX0a6e6+01y1TZem4QQZGU+dDeJaaPyWuZqy Ry4riAJ/GFDzS5Dr7xpnhxNNmDVuAoJOBcB25zrM9mW4NxbwLLw4vMsK7Yqg/nDY6sCvfpEn3STF iAff/B/BWxy532jss7qOkfeKGcB7Q0pk3DlGS1Uqujng1sH1iL5dZz9XG3BXc4hgh727LnALf6PR 19sN2wMuhLr7XWMTuhhUz8285CUcqZFGGsTONRonrF5yS/ckindNI4Uf4h2YYGmqliBTKKncU+ZK qyp9/LKuihPCiRoemJYrd5urE/lyPtjB9SfOGI6x2Xfi/GZTxdd0C9x6PQ5AOx2B2vragO9MZL2h LlTSdSr/kK9y2SFTXbz0O77cfzxnuNuz1KfxO6jF7Pb9U/xWbtqSRky4O6BguFIVdef0m87rfmdu FGZAVbjfAstN+p0FFTgD1ApK+cqz7dHO5Bm0Zk97lipD+eoyVYbXaZn4rakYrI1s/Pl40L44JSt7 x0VmzgAO2QrzvPoltLNNBBBq7IM8E7UVIMReDa65D9v1i0lgUPkuGxLqNnypr5EDqkrMlA2YKb0a 3HSYKclVVcnvJupFphabTBsSaHhTYlnwyj3GMpptaUmzSjbGAiOXlstawmxI4vTJM1bv1DamRLiY 2X1llpFbLNBSWJjXjgX+itqw11JomHZbK1vzO8ahl5KYMxWjZmdt4IW5Zs5WaRumUrvshj0BjP1S /igY9Vzw0n8ak1SZ9LGHFQsx4taD6KNUrao2lDVPSdth19cHlNc5TdpTt2Sj2k3LdLuh9egTJ/uU Ho+eTGdZbaH3maD1VjXMCZYSDt8sbeT0Noaq152NMaRlu11fwbYGcf5y6BMKXRrk6f3ssnAbX6FG QazOagjuQKzQ8lnZL4RvSsS3swqoo21Wc1/oF+ydu2Sh825DoqpaJLUTCHbU+NZUy7J8EjIFRqRq V5KnnezWjMNsszkcFwPQaXJUtqCKclkfz7BgD2U3lYRldT9zJNHMgpypbFbpZYCYmc4CnY6pfiwp kvjCiDYZsRLkF7MqqDfpJItx4hb6sG1NsGa763uc9UZfn2UdCqm7zdTAkH0BL0Yl37CEYwM4BJyc CrfbUO/i7IsLO5hlqH/ANScCadUYxso2MnU1+z/PX3PV+UvvfobH9dE8MzpFJCzcbEqBN8CcqUE1 Y29wlFk2y+hik+sO/Zo152qjeczqJNPehgxDht1Ush3ahWIz+j2S6u/jPiVgYti7MP6e9Xagm82m aFj2FTlrl9RIclb5u+cA8PQsf3/byAHDkmixKl5ezuoSbtyajWAChTp0MaAu76Wpd0wqeW47celv jQtjCapG1WPOWl/rYLt9PuiYVCJuOmY61/lPbkVOiCwk71vm/zjyEIz72iLjNx5Prk7ftwGyPOv0 vfrBW3GuH/CdjUCmX3g4R45deEg/qD+LPmw4T/f7/jxKGebHuQ8ZzuZzPnlUa/DIkRdx+cPdksms ga0FilclG0ia1pPWkGkAoL9DoHncTEAOgi/MOwIz01qqKxMHNdbfipxNyWOFXi7zYamrJCjjhPkU X3AkKr0cr5ikMmx1YfKcfkmSSC6gqOSZqwJXKBSYGatSOH+Afm1yZ35AUW9svxBKWhbN7FVTp9U2 ELjmCw/395iKKsyD/YG/hvTpEFK6id+3OBn4zDBP233UcKnm0nLgwuVTxspyrbgniqy6wsDN5jP6 KwJr11mPBN1wt/OsoRINtVZULBZYrmCRVeL5PXDIazRH/LyUocIc7j0IFTXuc4xKAL1KtiZbWgKv pNrw9auWkuSeFYHLp81n+X0B1H5SH9wBFHkvwo7DmtIyeIRGAp8tN06NJQA2V3V7/i3Pa0vq1Ysj cJDde6fM7UywiyuC3pRhD2WFzi+1b3xWFrzETk3sSNFXl6wPLUMBdtUxhL5eKVnmngsFcRSbIIQi 3lTAnQQAo6IqgZRHRzTVRRFqRVgq5o7Zgy2AtWhxglUB2AgP9pGZqIwz9dQJlhqw2K1SXScnOg3v 2UehS7WsIGdTYwJiy8vlrJNYWCFBq2tkDr2OTxdwyQpRXiuEJtSnGBLidYJ9z3fphYiDXvH0m+2W oIxQek6qi8kDcrHhGpl6znWVfDGX7mRLdW9gT+WXZnTc7Yu7N1A17NxYQdnupUU9vgp3LsPCyYu7 9QbV9iIWLDF3JRsT1L/ihm9DmzeP2yMzjcH8ZyI1KOI/uOIn2hjM39809mIMzgnwn/OskUNixKBm UbgF+U8Xq6ZwhsIQCj0scBN8vbg8U2aMyXhJtSmOJNYjgqXhzBHs8dsiJpvuXgALQf2PjVO8/4C8 pwihTQWbExTntxLcmSn5jfGZ6DIwmjiNWRtDlOf2msCTWkIAttTWL0p9ZgSbCKbKhOU1cZNypjPf C1id9O3HZzrfeGPQagaE/yHG0GfMMUhvvp6aOmHOyX1zqZVNl9xePdOseQ1HNH92B2vfNfjO84RM m0cwOxPwQVzfzNd8hSNplxpabuYI9w87TvoE8pprM0ck+Grmffh4uvD5c//ygs2N6SsMTD9ZyMj0 uwnD9zUQ+BTdJ77RdMAt4/5Bnc8wiYKGtTOsk9eJi+yAPRSUv+WrT0XyAk/UgC89+8mGwJPS6QL/ Z0TaXizKJ/ge2CSFnQsiSBU+OWY6K/3vFWL/OL92FcvxpO/CWoi5j3IXGk7OOd+f5j7CN7zoRfMY RpVDIecqU60sFZUR9rAK3LkKRAvRGbbjW3AO5qVk2aYNyvjJFITTasRgKqAXGE3jiVGchelvBA/g cOL0OYn1d8f44VO+PhVPeQTTxxGTPc/gWsqndeU18XFI0LQ3d+r50/Fo4hh3LR0zvLzXr+f9NKMq 78fx9ZSukvR8m/qCxOhpOLCNKc850do7RKt8VcgaC797EzTWAfuQjr2C/dbuAzQbzjj3+A4gkmFr wswj5AzvOxH2BsYuHbeL0y/mGSogng+1ib7Q3JZ85Ujgt+Yg9P0+SJWqcrExzDYKPBLGqrT21ASS ND0FDVIAULsqsLjerMCRyHpBwwih/KktgEYYA690hHDgiP9onOyXHhTxmKxux9BqevRSx5mR0I+z uoK5sJKzDqRbR+ihwuhQJ70Jrt3CYYlxlbKi4rov3CgL7sk3Ek0nQuIbD+cnHgvOcDpFU5RNZ2JM DYw2HR+WBWjKCXVKX0xzSaVAwVNcCc6KTJBeWsQztYFGBhjJWWr0lejYu7LMoFanPI8VvvsyO4aD +7T3fD0DxHN1euqTeFcyFe8N23L8PGIMy6deLMVHdWHMajoeooisqTCftuVk570sps1F0ptXPX2+ qOfBU7P63YOYnWq+//yh6Mjxa2naLzUbdhmG6SZT3ZD5O2VuTKxrxjy9zNxuPZ94LtvufRHFQu0x SvB5ovuT/H2MnNMmy3FpWHacvzJprCA6Eat5oR1fEaAFgPpXs4eKEqxiZLT/jkwitFu6ROOaL3VR 5/il82f5gYLVf26MpHpb2U3ZFj671nzfHmaDbCout+5hefxC5qq2M++RtQ522p3BF1kqbpeChQra 7T7MAYJSOwa8eYrgzsw1PGo+4eX4TM9h6/BPWIQ4hv8WY8uj3hM5hb7YJ5iXZZ45X3+ESu8jzPw8 j3vnkhWTp2TOQmd+aXQw/V96LyymwcLM/3pvIlezVd5Enssw0LveYm+hS1sYn+Cipjo4LPaCYruS D8ntvOyDaiwhbfoNVvLFnExfMSvHkDX2HunzYn4loDCzOFgj7wbUk70/xjkS8/W+x7a2Lues6Tzk v7COpbHgmXHTyfG/U4DsUHxhxHC3ZhW/OULXnwt4jbZmifNIleUOmc58/2QZUy78FB2AFvt/FP5O Wi2Z7z8VwWcSu3SP8Tbfaw8V/+rI2W3mujm+s9uAycff22K6q/1PHX+HOiX32j7TGfY7t5YjHapn wL6svZ4bndIQgbvxlCzEYEcZXX+EdNUPXFdrEhFZ22gChKsbf3VuokQIG8zzo9Yh1jpRF0gGIJP7 uyVpzgN7bpYzV5UGRCnwIHYZLpOtyQZq5KThehNtBuCDYbMZS11S06rKwcrbsQyJ/Qx7R43IF1Qt QJ9XeYQRpXXtwOGSArKrK1cbqzUroJoR7CmRvcnAvwwqx6xbJ/E1fyf1CDQHwILWbr6M5YCynFR1 MhENfMeMkppvB6J6c26PudAqwUGeiZvZM/W8Ywp5488bvrTD11MqM5zF8BpjCD8iPwshkFcmAhD4 Kd3Xg7iDGl74py8Li7NzO5kzuS2adoe2M6aDg1Yb3kYq7snLf0kh4B5pzIPlBHjUXKbpvknyJ4Di PHpeRYQofJNCIdAZS2NZKsKC85bduRfVVbdS4XLVu8Dl/uxbDdpd1C4LqD9DEmb9M2Wgxx5BSw/G KJW6NK/XF3Nv6KWKkSrau7ETXu984wvSf4ylBZg2F/gUkmoiXYS8I7kqKJs3ZGVeqbUkePnnxpIS e+/WEDT73okRfo1LiU9rLDFxLnDpb3lpjXEMrlT6WSinHcSolVm8t9hpkbbTvU3IQt3naWSiG52I 3LgXzr6yMU+Ip8aTVg+NTi67xsPYZRBWsJXnSjVpmpq6h7n3ECRXRBDbnUOffRFj4uRHhnPDWt/k X4L9Fn/yPrzVg75Pfvqgqdbfe8Z06vy/WM875m84ajp/7J/MZzoNTZaZa//NNzgZ5ocq3Ouho45m 6KglxfrjzTP3Hu23fwYFpfOp1miqcBtIRWe/aaSypkgb7crtGB7/9IcRFGqd0FMl3cWFqTJxPqDW looSSCWylBut5ZxUE1Ta9SQua2nxEw3ZXrCtINVS7CWcAzYEWCHuOioARseorVRFpKaYpSJ2IT3J iuDJ6rNTbVqZKUGDJLclaSVrQlYSSU6XJV0+xG1eRynG5/4rPVLEdhXRbVHKyE61HYwXU3iDuJTu tGXTnQ3Egdtf1K+w10OFgFeyA0KalYNtauQHDCrYbmOcZiqo1P2zVtKCaS+14+KzP3g+QHfPMzqf wmaUxKeCSQldaxeUFc96GWL2ANYPfhKEE1ZS9jHfXIt9HSGn9cR46q3gZzcZF7FXngyp/fulT9ZL 1hf/xFTdNMvCA8EmjDW8MqC698opbDtppUIfmqrPPii+FeghBqC43ae0EIQSkS/S8R6xzYzSfALB JlxB5ne5CUoi+eq0FnESasWTAKJ1gnvOvpIUaw4ldWkJ4KhkmcCnoUl8MJ7js6Zc5I5z9hDiQFNh KS6xK5Ddf2J3Swekb8sWFn9WWrQMklbyywiCEz4gOWaTrq6WfPiD5D5xFJNGkpp+CPsH1oH24lKd q8toYPRolnN1KY/8xFABv4F3qXHcV+AuGWfbmtOPydLJ9jt3RVkf1LwMDY92/3DWpXtjl+81Mo9q wrg4pHvKgBKiHxqv0yTGg00Ru5pVRiQVT5kr5I3+wGzaVIreciOzlv5SXV0MzEH+1oT1zngAQhfE ld5Nl2YKAlx7RnOip5e8bTqb/H/6NAtLzsYLpvOo/1QOe9nA31F0Veu/ewBufOQHxebK3/iGf0DS 99P1jxlO3hmfPKqIezOc0YTfmR/hfZi8ASavbG1R2doS7uIUHe5e9aoLlHOL+5jPeeyw+xgVSF6D OgheTfirtHBBwzqvImnNtBrfptV4T9iQllBSZIcAXyX1btQaweUzoTcUpmQX3ZIqZPanU607ZCU8 xvc/tRFWlxB4pDN4hS5HeUzo0uxU97Bsb1IyFIMkOiRy/3SVEMahUaRjqzwRyU71jcC9qTJdKaIF YE/j5Wo1+9eCF4WsYlrW1aUbqpZ6nz3SC2RflzABtbqV2oJM2L7PakYE/AbU6y46kKlDWNd0Y8RO PFzTCuCO50QhPAw9QfEFrG+1Xc/yAgsgXQX5sQV+UIN9/nDqkEBHYHZ5qoLjEzjm2ln/OXcSTnZa DaM4gWRiEub1WHo2sIN1twCRoUCZjm8h4zDDYCFpMMl2xzxJHyQ78Ygo53uH+FGUSn4JRTlfLmZ/ fYAu/fKonAUx1APnR70+54EYGrJy6iMQIw9neY8UGE44TxjOXKr1nGV5ppprbN2pmUz2u7nGNvY+ gAx/P15pSsal761yqtnB2sRkF5ffCNEjvrOLrK2HUf5aZkizt9Dsyyt9EWhZvGjEdLb5f1b8KH8v 5e91/veLF4PtHsGFXOj/uARyMuaGsLkc8ztzYshAaCB3oYFc9Dv3Vbj3AcjZWUiIvZ1lXfN61Gbh N9JFb5liUsbaCRLezdqh0bLWlrE27X/wbA2Fnk/4G1gMXpFss1RXLLkvZaU69DiiU5z4Q2i61dsm wka6boyZ7ZWGwRCmx1l/l3hl0bzLMKlJJZDYvjPSNUqWJ12LPEwhTOw53Y9wWnuWHqEYFnXCUlgB U3kFqWcEvAINXRET7n6cehqKdSvq5EaPd1jNqNIYLUkygUWeAq/7EWpxdoKuHVNiLi+GBMVF2VRU IDDp3IuZlRlAuFWEUSEDE7StI3AXlooWGnQX+tSPKJipx4TJz6Bwn2wgpPRjhSnFgHuDLhDGlSBN ErWC7H6NQfX7WgNArJFq6SUUN89Qq52o/5OiBw0nNur7eRFWxc+uo3Z5erBfud4QEFCoQcCGwJXr MuBRuA7d8vU47i0R9dJ93BhX686dxVOe6zt3NtdUD7rf+cR0ful3nnmQqlh+w/XRYtP9yO/eOSIl zUupRQS+/aHZOjaaeiOoBNiDnjyGJQe6BZmPAMAxHQD5p6iv9GiaeYkzRlNfpxjJsb54jLcYVEo1 5+hmYXTcl4SokWnDUALV90mzDRXxGnjqel5VWyXdRx6gZqRT1qNEd7KN2qRGbdXDJyylhoAPKRUu FutEev/IzCrV7vlgkdBraxNxdnK4YM+l4DXCnHY5bBcPifrc95KuxyoukTxZ6rHYX71gek8Pi7NF XYD+JKMXxsCuhRB1bi8hsb20athX4n5zGET7bBFf0aWxUV+RmzdqqhwjJya9/6Q11HCfsD13D/+C 6oAS3/CnbFyDPwmb7kb/0sF3mdLJHXhSpBXQBHvJ1DhYH7gSMNXGGQ4pXfpcJNWlZbqa0AlcLqci M+PwS3W+JN1Pq7QUfgv3U9t0vOUetXJ/h02m1Nyf3Ad7OhsbZSfQQknL25EANkpvxqn92tTx/0xr 1y6rNih3l3ZqVVnWrhpxQNN/VHS8hzK6nVRWzf+sy+cCiSKr2X0X+s9HVhnqV+vmGU71Wd+n66BH p2kzj8DcglLCiMPTyvY45VxMm46ayspEjdhvLEVf4SfIaFHVPhwQg+p+Vg81SP9hui/Mlf7D1VRM i1gnJLzgMvYPjaYKykBT6gIgrE98GdLgjtl9aUHs8gJBNgvKeVTOJnoA94gsEBNFVRXNHzWdav9f F9FfN+4uQ9P+v35naxwfpBK7PSAXOyNDuzd1QHoB0Pei1t5lh2dlagpvy9QUuo8Xi8HwNvdxn7L7 UQI6ZkFJ4E1rsMtnqf8GMOQUQgplbmRzdHJlYW0KZW5kb2JqCjIzIDAgb2JqCjI2NTkwCmVuZG9i agoyMSAwIG9iago8PCAvVHlwZSAvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0b3IgL0FzY2VudCA4ODAgL0NhcEhlaWdo dCA4MDEgL0Rlc2NlbnQgLTEyMCAvRmxhZ3MgMzIKL0ZvbnRCQm94IFstMzIzIC01ODAgMTQ2MCAx MjAzXSAvRm9udE5hbWUgL0hESFVGRytIaXJhS2FrdVN0ZC1XOCAvSXRhbGljQW5nbGUKMCAvU3Rl bVYgNTIgL0F2Z1dpZHRoIDEwMDAgL0xlYWRpbmcgNTAwIC9NYXhXaWR0aCAxNzE5IC9TdGVtSCA1 MiAvWEhlaWdodAo1NzkgL0ZvbnRGaWxlMyAyMiAwIFIgPj4KZW5kb2JqCjI0IDAgb2JqClsgXQpl bmRvYmoKMjAgMCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUgL0ZvbnQgL1N1YnR5cGUgL0NJREZvbnRUeXBlMCAvQmFz ZUZvbnQgL0hESFVGRytIaXJhS2FrdVN0ZC1XOCAvQ0lEU3lzdGVtSW5mbwo8PCAvUmVnaXN0cnkg KEFkb2JlKSAvT3JkZXJpbmcgKEphcGFuMSkgL1N1cHBsZW1lbnQgMyA+PiAvRm9udERlc2NyaXB0 b3IgMjEgMCBSCi9XIDI0IDAgUiAvRFcgMTAwMCA+PgplbmRvYmoKMTEgMCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUg L0ZvbnQgL1N1YnR5cGUgL1R5cGUwIC9FbmNvZGluZyAvSWRlbnRpdHktSCAvQmFzZUZvbnQgL0hE SFVGRytIaXJhS2FrdVN0ZC1XOAovRGVzY2VuZGFudEZvbnRzIFsgMjAgMCBSIF0gPj4KZW5kb2Jq CjI3IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9MZW5ndGggMjggMCBSIC9MZW5ndGgxIDI2NDggL0ZpbHRlciAvRmxhdGVE ZWNvZGUgPj4Kc3RyZWFtCngBxVVdaFv3FT//+79Xsr6uLFlftqzPa1myJMeSZUl1cWS7kZ04jhel /qg0Vid27MRa4sV0TpfSrDWDwibY2o1CWsbG3sagBZWOoYpBQ8fotpf1OZixl5WyPexhbFCo5f3u 1Y1Y+zD6MNiVzj2/c/7nS+eec3X43N1dstARccpc3986IO0Sq2BD158/DHdldg1cvHFwc1+Xd4iE j2/efuFGVxbvE0m/3Nvdgl67PsO9sAdFV2RT4CN7+4f3urJ4Cdx6+851/Vw8hNy3v3VPz0/HkMPf 2Nrf7dqbM+CJg+d29XOm1tdHszRH8/QUnaMyLdBi1/bxXSZiwFy4Tqp3VyJyoXKy/K2ngc3S8ca7 V+0z/6RB/omq/813a9rxh+986j95u/Mn8afiH6AwwbF7wYd/7fSQgmLi9FenTdGsZdIPNcZbZE61 iFLI5wJPL7fIVKm+w9gPai12+kqLyoH3EJFf3RxvEUuHwwv1cpNdgyCkoUhGgHg6vNjkscWnq0ot 3Ag3lnYa4cXw3tZOU4xpHAe7jdpEuEmr1Trua9VIc67m78HdWu1JxBHVOHCBeaOGCF/XI4BrqokT GEnp5XCTj1aqV6rNo7K/OVeu+SOR8ELzYaXafFj2R2o1WBl6laLib9d9es1G1GxI4ryvG2W12pzz N6nWaKgxV6tKpHnUaPgb+B263KKHX1Aw+qJiTlegE4iBTiy02FEFwcCUiF9VKBElgjprZeQ2pZdX qwuoNKJWav7vLbf0fghsrSjforXc9j9qufxlWm7/Ui3v71X6uZY7UHO/2nLn/7HlA//RcuzEJ7QB ioGi2AKGj7oxVjKA1Evdx+41xTaER3jnbGAb17gZyIi3UK4NhjipNpYbywEukARObTBBUzBEUw8s MOGpTHYg4ogUQQNKPrfBOh3hArvdef2tl17i5s/+tSLcO3n3iESKnf6Mf8AD5CA/FegO/aNNRbw2 1EAhsmvcCjnkcE63KaGjFoX6WzR+3KYsbNSzFp2DZuWjNl3u2RSh2YXmRs+/riNqUXaiRVOgGGhm ok01qujJZiirJbPTY5TooVIPlXvooo5aVEHC1Y9AiFkDXgNe0/Em8Cby3Oj51XWUybIgM8ra9wyL l1gxyNgZHgfzcpm5HS5ZUHAQZCWWd0yNAhQLHqZqC3FPSTjL4Nt1zBeVqMGYDwqTuSdhXXTL3M7c AAaPF0bCit1oNzkN8qTSH/FOlM2uKJs3B0cS7kL6K6E/m0xyfHFasFjSxaDFILlG3f2GzoxVmc0x XzwzZFJWMka7bXJ74uXvZ88HPPFUfiSZj0c9BqvNabsWmx/mBlvivCKYBacojIUW37hokXnpdy/2 mTrP5+/c2o77tv+4I9yWfPaTMV9s0OqKe82iddgtbOYu+yRBEKwnPJgcto3FDIIjOvx3d2bYE3E6 xgdf/TnnJYEJ+KYls+xxfGvHk3LJfoc36SFMXfT0Df5bHsKIRmmNDugV+jFbatM2rWuP9C7d13iD fqjxRbqocQsNaXwWU8HxnzCLRzaNxzSNx+SG7zTGYF6iRzD7K0h4dt6P2R+iQdAYaBq0BKqB6qAX QN8DvQn6Beg90O9BtmdbNITYAcQOYBxUrAAryFPAuUWb34vQVqCtQHukZ2/TAx11q/vJMSb3AUIM wChOilZ+Af+w6rq4aYAeaJMb0BFSIGgOQZPHLYoDT2AdKr3TAjRPQ/PVnuetHjpC9DiiZbISZuvx LLoMRpkbR+MlXiyog5ib9MS1iQMqCUX3GaZgziYLRVlwBZjL41UcEYdSYmfZDEMYj7fEpKkzQtwD R4y8Ntva7PL8gCbCozflXgz655RwVFPyH43XcvHiTvJRX58oib7MctEZe2Il6+MGweBWsBhrZ28p yfvnpy7kE66RqysWj3X5m26mTlCp85cZgWPWQnuy++SYCZyPBfq5bJSMzoDHHnQNRl19vzYaJWkR oSVvUHbyAyPQkiipxu6gK7L+xOVoZnQ9yT6WXJbCXmbiyqWl0ahz+Gx5OXnl5azELZ+K4ixX7YVZ UQzMj0rc4fcHXe+PzAXZdzp3w6XYh76o32szsnA54k+Ehuxmm0lyODqvLd3d3khZbGJiefPFZ9ic 5O3vrKa3UqNXc2w7V/FIImPyOVietOfXR0bW5wU2GA/57QZRfXszcupvcgNhMZYXnnpm6XJqde3C bv2wvnZu/FL95t7hvwGitCJxCmVuZHN0cmVhbQplbmRvYmoKMjggMCBvYmoKMTY1NQplbmRvYmoK MjYgMCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUgL0ZvbnREZXNjcmlwdG9yIC9Bc2NlbnQgODYwIC9DYXBIZWlnaHQg Nzc4IC9EZXNjZW50IC0xNDAgL0ZsYWdzIDMyCi9Gb250QkJveCBbLTU5NSAtMjkwIDExODIgMTIy Nl0gL0ZvbnROYW1lIC9LRUJXSU8rU1RIZWl0aVRDLUxpZ2h0IC9JdGFsaWNBbmdsZQowIC9TdGVt ViA3OCAvQXZnV2lkdGggOTk3IC9MZWFkaW5nIDMwIC9NYXhXaWR0aCAxMDY0IC9TdGVtSCAyOSAv WEhlaWdodCA1OTEKL0ZvbnRGaWxlMiAyNyAwIFIgPj4KZW5kb2JqCjI5IDAgb2JqClsgXQplbmRv YmoKMzAgMCBvYmoKPDwgL0xlbmd0aCAzMSAwIFIgL0ZpbHRlciAvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUgPj4Kc3Ry ZWFtCngB7dCBCQAACMOw6f9H+4UwSC8oSUSAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAEC BAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAQJ3A1B0bJkCAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQ IECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECA AAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAEC BAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQIECAAAECBAgQ IECAAAECBAgQIECAAIEfgT27YAAECmVuZHN0cmVhbQplbmRvYmoKMzEgMCBvYmoKMzAyCmVuZG9i agoyNSAwIG9iago8PCAvVHlwZSAvRm9udCAvU3VidHlwZSAvQ0lERm9udFR5cGUyIC9CYXNlRm9u dCAvS0VCV0lPK1NUSGVpdGlUQy1MaWdodCAvQ0lEU3lzdGVtSW5mbwo8PCAvUmVnaXN0cnkgKEFk b2JlKSAvT3JkZXJpbmcgKElkZW50aXR5KSAvU3VwcGxlbWVudCAwID4+IC9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRv cgoyNiAwIFIgL1cgMjkgMCBSIC9EVyAxMDAwIC9DSURUb0dJRE1hcCAzMCAwIFIgPj4KZW5kb2Jq CjMyIDAgb2JqCjw8IC9MZW5ndGggMzMgMCBSIC9GaWx0ZXIgL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlID4+CnN0cmVh bQp4AV2QTWrEMAyF9z6FltPFkGRoOg0YwzClkEV/aNoDOLYSDI1tHGeR21d20ilUYIElfY8nFdf2 qbUmQvEenOowwmCsDji7JSiEHkdjWXUCbVTcf7mmJulZQXC3zhGn1g4OOGcAxQchcwwrHC7a9XiX am9BYzB2hMPXtcuVbvH+Gye0EUomBGgcSO5F+lc5IRQZPbaa+iauR6L+Jj5Xj0COiKg2S8ppnL1U GKQdkfGSQvBnCsHQ6n/t0wb1wz5dPZT3gm+57utGMH5udC323DyeZZb5BZJi2v7mVi0hkNF8orxD 8mYs3q7onU8+8vsBqpl2pQplbmRzdHJlYW0KZW5kb2JqCjMzIDAgb2JqCjI0MgplbmRvYmoKMTAg MCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUgL0ZvbnQgL1N1YnR5cGUgL1R5cGUwIC9FbmNvZGluZyAvSWRlbnRpdHkt SCAvVG9Vbmljb2RlIDMyIDAgUiAvQmFzZUZvbnQKL0tFQldJTytTVEhlaXRpVEMtTGlnaHQgL0Rl c2NlbmRhbnRGb250cyBbIDI1IDAgUiBdID4+CmVuZG9iagozNCAwIG9iagooV29ya2Jvb2sxKQpl bmRvYmoKMzUgMCBvYmoKKE1hYyBPUyBYIDEwLjYuNyBRdWFydHogUERGQ29udGV4dCkKZW5kb2Jq CjM2IDAgb2JqCihPd2VuIE8nTWFsbGV5KQplbmRvYmoKMzcgMCBvYmoKKCkKZW5kb2JqCjM4IDAg b2JqCihNaWNyb3NvZnQgRXhjZWwpCmVuZG9iagozOSAwIG9iagooRDoyMDExMDYyNDA3MTg0Mlow MCcwMCcpCmVuZG9iago0MCAwIG9iagooKQplbmRvYmoKNDEgMCBvYmoKWyAoKSBdCmVuZG9iagox IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UaXRsZSAzNCAwIFIgL0F1dGhvciAzNiAwIFIgL1N1YmplY3QgMzcgMCBSIC9Q cm9kdWNlciAzNSAwIFIgL0NyZWF0b3IKMzggMCBSIC9DcmVhdGlvbkRhdGUgMzkgMCBSIC9Nb2RE YXRlIDM5IDAgUiAvS2V5d29yZHMgNDAgMCBSIC9BQVBMOktleXdvcmRzCjQxIDAgUiA+PgplbmRv YmoKeHJlZgowIDQyCjAwMDAwMDAwMDAgNjU1MzUgZiAKMDAwMDA1NzY4MyAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAw MDA4MDA5IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTEwMDkgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAwMDAyMiAwMDAwMCBuIAow MDAwMDA3OTg5IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDgxMTMgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxMDk3MyAwMDAwMCBu IAowMDAwMDI2NzU1IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDA1NzI4MiAwMDAw MCBuIAowMDAwMDU0MTMyIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDAwMDAgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAwODIzNyAw MDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDEwOTUyIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTEwOTIgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxMTE0 MiAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDI2MTUyIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMjYxNzQgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAy NjQxMiAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDUzOTI4IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTM2MzkgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAw MDAyNjkyNyAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDUzNjE3IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTM5MDggMDAwMDAgbiAK MDAwMDA1NjcxNyAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU2MDMxIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTQyNjUgMDAwMDAg biAKMDAwMDA1NjAxMCAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU2Mjk5IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTYzMTkgMDAw MDAgbiAKMDAwMDA1NjY5NyAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU2OTQ0IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTcyNjIg MDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDA1NzQzNCAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU3NDYyIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwNTc1 MTQgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDA1NzU0NiAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU3NTY1IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAw NTc1OTkgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDA1NzY0MSAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDU3NjYwIDAwMDAwIG4gCnRy YWlsZXIKPDwgL1NpemUgNDIgL1Jvb3QgMTUgMCBSIC9JbmZvIDEgMCBSIC9JRCBbIDxkZTY0MDEw NDgwM2NmZWQ5MGEwY2Q0OTIxZGQyNTBkMz4KPGRlNjQwMTA0ODAzY2ZlZDkwYTBjZDQ5MjFkZDI1 MGQzPiBdID4+CnN0YXJ0eHJlZgo1Nzg1OAolJUVPRgo= --Apple-Mail-13--118723366 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
--Apple-Mail-13--118723366 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=Powered-By-PMC.pdf Content-Type: application/pdf; x-mac-hide-extension=yes; x-unix-mode=0644; name="Powered-By-PMC.pdf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 JVBERi0xLjMKJcTl8uXrp/Og0MTGCjQgMCBvYmoKPDwgL0xlbmd0aCA1IDAgUiAvRmlsdGVyIC9G bGF0ZURlY29kZSA+PgpzdHJlYW0KeAHNXNuO1EYQffdX9Fs8Utb4fpGiaAMBJSHkAivxEPIAM7CQ BNgwA1Hy9Sm7+1R7y7a2p+0do33wXLrbNXU5daq6vX+rX9XfqshVUedRTJc4jeJUJVkRNaX68FI9 Ve/UnXv7RG33Ku7+9luaEUdJWZT6E/0yqVUe09w4roPtW3X3QuVp9z1d0oy+qdKCRhR1lBe1unir 7jxIolgl6uKV+k2F9zbqLI5SFb7e0OJ0/dBdg/BN90Wuwr1qP6EX37bXQoXv22uiwo/dSBVe/oWh z81InvKV/iYItzuHWeeYf4UXW0j1sl05U2G0CTopsZqWlmT4eqN+Vxc/qPsXpFlH3QZH6FZJ3SZl nEdZ3mpf6za4rtsw3aiLP46Sh20d3GzroTxV1URVwuKwqYPO1GHuL466WZyB6yV1U0ZV1gzl0a4X Fk7yBJ6hMFBPLxTIbkmSCHNRKDwy/gzng+/h/Q5O+MkMRGA83AQZ+YKNjHdiJXgpJpiwUOFb49a4 xWvj3ng/uKVTiFCoUCC/b9eiMMXNvULEuGQQO/jAQOe9ENE6J58MevAzJ0RInuAGOBzKwyHC4mg0 XD1EhDwmRMoTh0iZ1lFTlxSyUyHywPgrJwc41/4A3368USkFmA0GnSaCEEGx80BqRkYfs3PoZ01O EFlmAhop9J+0v4tSHFIafhYifg8swK/EBAx8swkojdIK+JWsIQKLhO6qQsS0TI6UYa/fNggHtwVO 7M//lctBMmREXM+61Jv0EjlE20YGnrYYi+Vdk+hiqMwIAdMIVJ6DEHOSKMQRnnLqJJrWTRGVRaoG 8hiESE+LEFkaNxHRHZZHmmsGyfAxl43sVlF5Ugh79SL7gPDb/mm8X4by1Igg5HS9H4453yF4XyCa tghfxBkC72WbkYkmHFzjbLFCwMaZVNQ6jmQd28izsiNZx5b6mUcNIirViIu1mcGDr/TcO6earayG 7v2zRnkV/oMaDM4Hp4Ob88gvTK571MVBwHmJqzh+gaUo53SMEktxPMDjdf44ZqkbeWxApZ6+K26C VHvZ5w9FSVSjrHJK63FC5XMaVXU7rWmaml5R9fAqcKwG+xzj6Eq7F2DCVCbA3JBxucRqqG5Wa3Fk fCVOiWMUf3yAmqtByCM8eU6ed6hMBtVpGqdlFNeVGshjzJU56Wcxc6VJXkV5mbM80l6FkzyL2StN yzoi12F5pL3cSpNRebzs1cJyR4SMP7M8xl5u+lnMXr18MR5fM/TjE182U1Q1tV2ShvWj8xcRoQsq HOJKNwYIIalAA+sHrD81gIuKgkuYg04EQYiRnAAOAGesBdBG6sB7Tk968V5VYhZX4fklFgFVYwE4 I2G5XuWiKdWKjEpqfGXAN+JIAHGrFEYD1schLeBL9RhCNSMBeQEIA76UZx0AsYA/Ya9TAwgDvtSP sZdbQhz1Hy97MeBLeYy93PRzC4A/Ya+BP7f7OGVRRXFMxDSNaV+nVnUUZ02jeWlvg4e6q+3fzV32 QUezh/tEfbNqpKtNuF9Xbf9p/x9KBMA4AT41xHqtOnzxLETz6CfGYN6KAeQzKAOu9882qEa+FBXD k7bype4YiVC0W0hID7ghJ5Q94VRXIzfmWpkrJfju89TU0Ge4FbIVpOCNJsh5dYm7vWvXoM443n/Y BEkV1bY1xz/Jqc3WtFN7GUm325HEZmUkL8jFhlRWaV8QHODUzasEJYgUx0SwW0ZaLIJtqJQVxWGa iQxJFOmb1j/IS2FCuBQqT/hN2w0u2rghVtO0E54b98ZADhr497Bd3O660kwMeNy1dck3sZSUYQdh uFmMqRw7GGGn6qCDVHu8YPGc3Lzjimddf5t+Ms9FMH2W3eRxE8+JAK+IRAQYcWRAuhUti+VUy8mk PCtFJHOyCXPN4Bw+5rKcTOpnJc7KnEzKsw4HSrE/mI3bixAUR0SANJyDAVZE25yOadwG7KdZVFbl EPYhNIT9aGjCJYTmMzL45nAwMGh3NXkww/F2MNruDl6O9j8JrnvsBMwCYkGnzvv4i+nQNjfLUR06 nuUYBTKfQGVmYcSRuJr6N8scSPigmdjDVa0elsfE6Yl7v7a5OWEut9ppMXP1cFXoZ3VcFfIYe7nl ncXCy26GTdhrhj/7hJdtbk7E14l5i2XuRdlEWTpyinHY3NztlCHlPxpWz8z1iruH4LAAesZu7mvu dudbUxUGg4OPfDqLoPl6IQns5juBk5uqMDjmmOJCG1PjynPE7sWcnbHbiCPS8ZyNIB9ft9gt1WOw aQZW+uQSi91SnpWwiTemJuw16Hu5n2j2sZfdmJL6MfZyy7Wjuc3LXtynlPKsk/stdk/Ya4Z+vOyF E+hZkeRtCxSHpLW5qGS43zXy6FQMN98YqAHLzL9BhXkoQzPPAaQPT9mhe8OTeQ5DvD00C+7uD/F0 8ptOHpz27IHQsXFBt3R9CwjfWVwCvBu5Gg1QHwfsAfyYA4br4ft1cYyt3OB0MVtZaq5dRxrrxMyz h+7XtbM6uF8XZ53A6mF7J4401gxX9oksS8vzMo7KLB1i+/ct9aamMTrTAGcA+3cd9vceKWJs3mvC bI+UyalM1W/e/znXQyx/l3cZCgj+jrsid+Dk5hr8XWp5HSdk/m7EkU54Yn5h4V2qx0DGDATz4oPc 05byGHO5pb9bAPgJe50aNLinLfVj7OWWAEfpgZe9mJ/mcRmldc4gpu1FBPWX7oGWbpdPbw8eqNyn Tm3vDNPgTDkDG3gkgIQfk2H8usIzX4Ohoz3i9s52Bxs4BWJMO9rd98494sUUaXvE44pcrc9gxJE4 dWK/7+GU8LOV/N7ilJBndZzS8kh7nTivWCYq3XmlvMJ7b1IexilsY2l0wvN3QXgFtkUqdNp7m8KE o5+3tAyRqv+oyUaeX4DQYHEQHmD4AtQRP+Jui709xgjEO2AFTMBjPlgJK2MhBuAdZmIpzOB7e5xM DfgQyaxzQJTSjta6ReJxrTsi8ZQXHP1ohN3ekPIYqEmdtusWo0S2jDLySKipneQZ1c+8Oiptqqio R85uP9yo8QfM7QNpTDC4q4VPtMMH/IwruXsSq/BTd+Ko91wqH/CjyGkHgFMMAoaOPwVmhbpuyzuw EAQSQnB4FG8sksyDs1yUYbWpvZMb/6XCYp5iI8lYRnrKqUkEzhONO8qcvRMf7mw5jZTHBLZbzl7M XHbvZMJcxYkDm/dOpH5W4nxce0l5VuJ8vHfyedjLJgapH2MvOovM/9HlfzslxYAKZW5kc3RyZWFt CmVuZG9iago1IDAgb2JqCjI0MjAKZW5kb2JqCjIgMCBvYmoKPDwgL1R5cGUgL1BhZ2UgL1BhcmVu dCAzIDAgUiAvUmVzb3VyY2VzIDYgMCBSIC9Db250ZW50cyA0IDAgUiAvTWVkaWFCb3ggWzAgMCA2 MTIgNzkyXQo+PgplbmRvYmoKNiAwIG9iago8PCAvUHJvY1NldCBbIC9QREYgL1RleHQgXSAvQ29s b3JTcGFjZSA8PCAvQ3MxIDcgMCBSID4+IC9Gb250IDw8IC9GMS4wIDggMCBSCj4+ID4+CmVuZG9i ago5IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9MZW5ndGggMTAgMCBSIC9OIDMgL0FsdGVybmF0ZSAvRGV2aWNlUkdCIC9G aWx0ZXIgL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlID4+CnN0cmVhbQp4AZ2Wd1RT2RaHz703vdASIiAl9Bp6CSDSO0gV BFGJSYBQAoaEJnZEBUYUESlWZFTAAUeHImNFFAuDgmLXCfIQUMbBUURF5d2MawnvrTXz3pr9x1nf 2ee319ln733XugBQ/IIEwnRYAYA0oVgU7uvBXBITy8T3AhgQAQ5YAcDhZmYER/hEAtT8vT2ZmahI xrP27i6AZLvbLL9QJnPW/3+RIjdDJAYACkXVNjx+JhflApRTs8UZMv8EyvSVKTKGMTIWoQmirCLj xK9s9qfmK7vJmJcm5KEaWc4ZvDSejLtQ3pol4aOMBKFcmCXgZ6N8B2W9VEmaAOX3KNPT+JxMADAU mV/M5yahbIkyRRQZ7onyAgAIlMQ5vHIOi/k5aJ4AeKZn5IoEiUliphHXmGnl6Mhm+vGzU/liMSuU w03hiHhMz/S0DI4wF4Cvb5ZFASVZbZloke2tHO3tWdbmaPm/2d8eflP9Pch6+1XxJuzPnkGMnlnf bOysL70WAPYkWpsds76VVQC0bQZA5eGsT+8gAPIFALTenPMehmxeksTiDCcLi+zsbHMBn2suK+g3 +5+Cb8q/hjn3mcvu+1Y7phc/gSNJFTNlReWmp6ZLRMzMDA6Xz2T99xD/48A5ac3Jwyycn8AX8YXo VVHolAmEiWi7hTyBWJAuZAqEf9Xhfxg2JwcZfp1rFGh1XwB9hTlQuEkHyG89AEMjAyRuP3oCfetb EDEKyL68aK2Rr3OPMnr+5/ofC1yKbuFMQSJT5vYMj2RyJaIsGaPfhGzBAhKQB3SgCjSBLjACLGAN HIAzcAPeIACEgEgQA5YDLkgCaUAEskE+2AAKQTHYAXaDanAA1IF60AROgjZwBlwEV8ANcAsMgEdA CobBSzAB3oFpCILwEBWiQaqQFqQPmULWEBtaCHlDQVA4FAPFQ4mQEJJA+dAmqBgqg6qhQ1A99CN0 GroIXYP6oAfQIDQG/QF9hBGYAtNhDdgAtoDZsDscCEfCy+BEeBWcBxfA2+FKuBY+DrfCF+Eb8AAs hV/CkwhAyAgD0UZYCBvxREKQWCQBESFrkSKkAqlFmpAOpBu5jUiRceQDBoehYZgYFsYZ44dZjOFi VmHWYkow1ZhjmFZMF+Y2ZhAzgfmCpWLVsaZYJ6w/dgk2EZuNLcRWYI9gW7CXsQPYYew7HA7HwBni HHB+uBhcMm41rgS3D9eMu4Drww3hJvF4vCreFO+CD8Fz8GJ8Ib4Kfxx/Ht+PH8a/J5AJWgRrgg8h liAkbCRUEBoI5wj9hBHCNFGBqE90IoYQecRcYimxjthBvEkcJk6TFEmGJBdSJCmZtIFUSWoiXSY9 Jr0hk8k6ZEdyGFlAXk+uJJ8gXyUPkj9QlCgmFE9KHEVC2U45SrlAeUB5Q6VSDahu1FiqmLqdWk+9 RH1KfS9HkzOX85fjya2Tq5FrleuXeyVPlNeXd5dfLp8nXyF/Sv6m/LgCUcFAwVOBo7BWoUbhtMI9 hUlFmqKVYohimmKJYoPiNcVRJbySgZK3Ek+pQOmw0iWlIRpC06V50ri0TbQ62mXaMB1HN6T705Pp xfQf6L30CWUlZVvlKOUc5Rrls8pSBsIwYPgzUhmljJOMu4yP8zTmuc/jz9s2r2le/7wplfkqbip8 lSKVZpUBlY+qTFVv1RTVnaptqk/UMGomamFq2Wr71S6rjc+nz3eez51fNP/k/IfqsLqJerj6avXD 6j3qkxqaGr4aGRpVGpc0xjUZmm6ayZrlmuc0x7RoWgu1BFrlWue1XjCVme7MVGYls4s5oa2u7act 0T6k3as9rWOos1hno06zzhNdki5bN0G3XLdTd0JPSy9YL1+vUe+hPlGfrZ+kv0e/W3/KwNAg2mCL QZvBqKGKob9hnmGj4WMjqpGr0SqjWqM7xjhjtnGK8T7jWyawiZ1JkkmNyU1T2NTeVGC6z7TPDGvm aCY0qzW7x6Kw3FlZrEbWoDnDPMh8o3mb+SsLPYtYi50W3RZfLO0sUy3rLB9ZKVkFWG206rD6w9rE mmtdY33HhmrjY7POpt3mta2pLd92v+19O5pdsN0Wu067z/YO9iL7JvsxBz2HeIe9DvfYdHYou4R9 1RHr6OG4zvGM4wcneyex00mn351ZzinODc6jCwwX8BfULRhy0XHhuBxykS5kLoxfeHCh1FXbleNa 6/rMTdeN53bEbcTd2D3Z/bj7Kw9LD5FHi8eUp5PnGs8LXoiXr1eRV6+3kvdi72rvpz46Pok+jT4T vna+q30v+GH9Av12+t3z1/Dn+tf7TwQ4BKwJ6AqkBEYEVgc+CzIJEgV1BMPBAcG7gh8v0l8kXNQW AkL8Q3aFPAk1DF0V+nMYLiw0rCbsebhVeH54dwQtYkVEQ8S7SI/I0shHi40WSxZ3RslHxUXVR01F e0WXRUuXWCxZs+RGjFqMIKY9Fh8bFXskdnKp99LdS4fj7OIK4+4uM1yWs+zacrXlqcvPrpBfwVlx Kh4bHx3fEP+JE8Kp5Uyu9F+5d+UE15O7h/uS58Yr543xXfhl/JEEl4SyhNFEl8RdiWNJrkkVSeMC T0G14HWyX/KB5KmUkJSjKTOp0anNaYS0+LTTQiVhirArXTM9J70vwzSjMEO6ymnV7lUTokDRkUwo c1lmu5iO/kz1SIwkmyWDWQuzarLeZ0dln8pRzBHm9OSa5G7LHcnzyft+NWY1d3Vnvnb+hvzBNe5r Dq2F1q5c27lOd13BuuH1vuuPbSBtSNnwy0bLjWUb326K3tRRoFGwvmBos+/mxkK5QlHhvS3OWw5s xWwVbO3dZrOtatuXIl7R9WLL4oriTyXckuvfWX1X+d3M9oTtvaX2pft34HYId9zd6brzWJliWV7Z 0K7gXa3lzPKi8re7V+y+VmFbcWAPaY9kj7QyqLK9Sq9qR9Wn6qTqgRqPmua96nu37Z3ax9vXv99t f9MBjQPFBz4eFBy8f8j3UGutQW3FYdzhrMPP66Lqur9nf19/RO1I8ZHPR4VHpcfCj3XVO9TXN6g3 lDbCjZLGseNxx2/94PVDexOr6VAzo7n4BDghOfHix/gf754MPNl5in2q6Sf9n/a20FqKWqHW3NaJ tqQ2aXtMe9/pgNOdHc4dLT+b/3z0jPaZmrPKZ0vPkc4VnJs5n3d+8kLGhfGLiReHOld0Prq05NKd rrCu3suBl69e8blyqdu9+/xVl6tnrjldO32dfb3thv2N1h67npZf7H5p6bXvbb3pcLP9luOtjr4F fef6Xfsv3va6feWO/50bA4sG+u4uvnv/Xtw96X3e/dEHqQ9eP8x6OP1o/WPs46InCk8qnqo/rf3V +Ndmqb307KDXYM+ziGePhrhDL/+V+a9PwwXPqc8rRrRG6ketR8+M+YzderH0xfDLjJfT44W/Kf62 95XRq59+d/u9Z2LJxPBr0euZP0reqL45+tb2bedk6OTTd2nvpqeK3qu+P/aB/aH7Y/THkensT/hP lZ+NP3d8CfzyeCZtZubf94Tz+wplbmRzdHJlYW0KZW5kb2JqCjEwIDAgb2JqCjI2MTIKZW5kb2Jq CjcgMCBvYmoKWyAvSUNDQmFzZWQgOSAwIFIgXQplbmRvYmoKMyAwIG9iago8PCAvVHlwZSAvUGFn ZXMgL01lZGlhQm94IFswIDAgNjEyIDc5Ml0gL0NvdW50IDEgL0tpZHMgWyAyIDAgUiBdID4+CmVu ZG9iagoxMSAwIG9iago8PCAvVHlwZSAvQ2F0YWxvZyAvUGFnZXMgMyAwIFIgPj4KZW5kb2JqCjEy IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9MZW5ndGggMTMgMCBSIC9MZW5ndGgxIDE5MTY4IC9GaWx0ZXIgL0ZsYXRlRGVj b2RlID4+CnN0cmVhbQp4Aa18CXhU1dnwOecuc+/sM5mZJJNlZjLZJ2FCMpMQCMwlC2QBE5aEBBiS QIAQQQIEZKvBhUVUQLSudd9a/VvCIoKmlYKlqNVKbbXauqNVK0qVUguZyf+ec2dCbO33fP/3/QP3 znvues67b5O+1WsXIz3agjikLFrR2YvYR06Cr1cXretzq2N+NkL4riW9S1eoY+ELhMj4pcs3LFHH 2i6EQr/oXtwJ3+wzBPvSbjigDnEAvjO7V/StV8dSLnyfW75yUey8/CmMN67oXB97P/ozjN1Xda5Y rF5ff4yOe1eu6YuNM+H7R72rF8eux60wH/rOUR8jTBmGFWgp0qArkYAIMiM/aoErtfgUrBez8wLZ fQD9nzfaTRV/RykSu//Ja6rzKHD8xFOfDukit+luk+iTZHiC+oGRpIvOREhfMKQb1uhuY0+KnWRf FUfR7OFjSvqBvOJS8wH3AeVA04HeA1sOPHhg4MBrB94/oD124NwBcgQu6X06ManUVY1NLa4W0tjc 3kxWzsYPzN43m8yYlcjPnOXgZ8208/V1M/kpdWX81Lpivha2umA5XxEq5ieGJvKTQh6+KpTGV4Zm 8pNhU2ALBYv54pIuviQY4IOB2XwgmM6/Fng/cC7AHRn+8uChrNrSI8PvHzxk9sL3l4rhkGwqPeSs 5dcd3HYQpnXu4EF2xUVl+KCcWXrQVsvfuCOB713eu56YfvTe/US5z5FcqvzIkVKq3JkI0B2JKaXb tia4TDeYtpp2mXab9rhucO1y7fbv2rJ1y47dt+7Zumf7nh0m5TrZXGpa7VpNlFWyvtS0ArtPYfev cejkVyeJ+1fKrwhaiNFC80KidD7YSUzzcKHNwhfYsnifrZzPtyXweTY777Kl8x53Fe+2VfAvOmt4 Z8pUPsVZwTttxbwdrkuA6VptTt4CW68NK7bJVaUmY74LidhwosGlP97g0h5rcMmwCYMNLv7nDS7u aIOLPNvgwocbXOiZBteJ4/muY8/nu36utAx6XM8e9bieOexxHT/xguH5Y780DP78F/qjzz6nP/zM Eb15cMsgUY5uOUpMh0OHGw/3H+ZNh/0ArgTw+cO/PTx8WNLKZbzeQASecIRgRJoEfAQP4wFrA2qY XTmQgOF7VuV+udjXMNA1s3LrLbekDdzRMLN1YEta2xEJrmkdwAN4V9uA1DArBiIf/azpW7OGAf+y G+BqBsSa7s4B0Vu9hg6MdGD0VgMwYKKwyVvtwwO2mu4BG0D/9pA18Q+cUk+qL2IwWvsvr2NDOpc+ mJHPJ6aLNuGccJrfzIe5d0Dq0PBfhj+Iro92Rdu425ELJOQO9CQ6ik6iV0eEZhAdZ/A6dAAdQy+P HKfAteh29Dj6DXobfTVy/C50P3oKDYyMKbAH0aOPop+gn6GD6Fl0Ao7tQLfC0cfQ/xl15Uq0He1G 96IH0es4LXb8BLFhdQafIT05jdfgXciJClA1mo/WoGvQNpjXKTwNjk2EY01wdDVaj/bC0aPo1Khn x8GJoGnCqAddhfbDFb9kh/Ph3tmoC47SY+pnFdqIbkQPoSfQc2glwNthvvfEHzLq+1riIR7Uhz6G O1/CPyQnYUVPoK2iDWkREk5TrPJhhls0/AFC0a7hvyPELSTnycPkVrSP9KBpir15dllpsX9MYUF2 lsuWYLUY9MCTBe4BLqvGW+Pt7N7prul27/RWd1QXFgD/1VSneDxthQVuOFztHsAd7pqBKeu6k3bW 0AsGrL4BklVDt54B5aYOALzVHo8HziRcPgM67uZRp9zLBpTOAXSTe3/BsZ03HzGjhR0+fZe3q3N+ 6wDXCe/aj2Ay3cDx8EW3jm73AA8PZrsUOBKbIj3X3QF7bzXc9b3H4bBc1brdcyxlwArfNQMW38BU eNLUjWdSuJ01ScvcdLhz53b3wIMzWkef9dBr2trakr6DhineKR07d07xuqfs7NjZeWR4y0Kv2+zd ub+hYWdvTYd7ADWBcMLxZ29KGZhyc9uAuaMbjwfs0XVMmdkaSvFYYKoeD13vTUcUtBAGA1tmtKpj N1qYcgApfl/bAOmgZ47Fz9ib6Zkt8TMjt3d4Ga6rWrkUAg9umOVtmDG31V2zsyNGt9iRcSoV9xNU ud+Ld8zYr+Ads+a2HgXBdO+Y3XqAYFLVUdlG0UiqZreOvgvupBwA9g5MHHkNbGc2epR7GD0N223k M3QbfN8N3xHBgR2CAz0E2xOwTYftOdhuhO0e2DbCtkq8GUXFm7EerOyAsB45hc3olHAHWiPmw7cJ neLvRqdEDp3iFsB9N6FX+D4Y/wLODcH3NLSGfx3gPbCtR9v4LxHSfIbm86+ibn4IHeV9aBl8L+df QD30WzCjo6QY7eMH0S/h+znNKXSUHuP/xM4f5XrYPVdxOWgSHN8P102E+bXQbz4Akku9B2r1wcgj ETQS4ArNix2hR+mHgBfBM0iAazQMksBP0CId3GVARmSi2g8+FtissCUgG7IjB0pESSgZxk6UAvtU lIbSQXbdyAOjDORF1L9BKIvtv7vLRjkoF+WhfDjsA/0EtEFjwK8pQmNRMSqBUQAFUSkqQ+NQOYzG owmwpx8X/BuHbkaf4QQ8Fk/HPyMzOZG7nffwx/mI8Ka4UjwkXtS8J4XlMnm/tkr7iE6j2617U3+V /ohhozHbeNLUbU4xX7BUWV60vpyw05Zse9Xe7ahPlBOvShKSmpLXOsc430y5LzU1zZp2Z3pd+mOu kOs+13vwZrB5QC1AEeBLg2zPiIRHdPO/8s4rbDe2yGPxWLJgh+Gqi1sEdIl+IwAoHR7lTuPrQNNx yK5oCeGwScCogPOfDaNQiX9sEea8HL7Ot8Mn2iI/J1Vwx9PRLs4Ed9hRi1IlY1mTjJM1uVyu0Ihr uVqhUdOO2zUr8UpNP15P1ov9GqsGY/1GHktFlMYmPZjrZpNelmHv4nc4zOfP+nwl/nAFvDEELwxj bzaxmK1lJXZR1IjEbrMmOhyJnOnj/S+8sP/jGbeFKhrqJlXcMz3a9TJ+HxfCv/df1tY9378p+sdH n4qe2bLp1zV0ZbdFu8hZNs8epVzkxAQ7Z0/IxtlcdkK2fSpWOCVhqr2Ja0ro4DoSNqB1pJfrTVhn s1sxr1+LsDXEY57XHRk+f4hOmAKKiU5a50J6k4k0o72J5gu+f527mWi8wdLSslJrMEBysrNzgiUO KzkLE59+74RJdfUTQ7fNgIWQiujrUffL2ppfb9qCU596FOdu6n++Tvty1M1mvouEwHpyKKhkO3E+ 9pEgKic1qBbe2ka6wFT9itMDsVpAQnjiJIT4wyV+ZD5fTCkWlrE3gYSin+z9GU6LrCK7KTbuJmM5 mXwCz3QrNlxpAsVkEhpRo9CO2gVgBeIHEiB/+Cw8wBP0cHJkD+klY5+m90Zg9wWbj/swacESKsRH hj9VtBQLfhzCBPvDvrMoBPd6vJYS/MVXX8HVGDtgdhXCGyCpO5SgMEUU9ZyRq8WSyeKyEIG4TNhk 0hv1ej1pNhr0erHZ6CYhbiXXy3Gc3mwmzeBQv6/o6Gs4B0U9jM8raTodQOn0Lk40AGk4s8Egwp4+ gfPH/adwCZCmvNgf9pcAY0WKgZvp/GBtFk+wGAhUWlZi8fAVQ2/j0uhLoT1ZY4L8vbjoLu6THXZb 8vTJF4/Dyh+CFdwqnENu9IEyo8nV4SICJ1ocnN2SaZkgjDMEjaG0UHq5q0GoNdQYG9Ma0+tc7VyY Dwvz5BZLe/KClHBqe1p7eg/XJS62LLSvTO8lfZZ+Z39qf3oWrObTQ3TSEBV8qoQohExmU6HkTy0y KSbRpNA1wh5WZzLp6hMIcdVjyUUkj4NxoIMJkYOnCHFQ1CTTGxwO+iSHw31/hinDlUEAkXd7zBcA E3TH0HPWWs5QcrYExuGxRbDDYUAN5dvSYCDbmyEyLi6hTj/IIPvv4W8dMi97fd6xXXffOO/3i7VT z678GPO+/JxlDVeeWcR5Ts891Pbsn/r7rlcqf+cd/87Pm2+rnLS+btmvZgMenxj+gN8MeJyIjii7 dDrB79TZ/Xm6bH9eRYUuaBubEfDX62psVRlV/hbcJrTpmv09uiX+nor1unX+vuCmCmdgfPV4MmE8 4BcXWgpJYWFevUseS0wGl4EYDJZ6Wev1lDFWKuMpU5SJFAtl6WMcHm5M+ngIEjgnYxm4BtjkwZAp 5AoR/T2TzJ+EzZ/4fJbEcvNZv5/ih3IyCEPIWk6//JHyckBRGDscKi68GUyoHSWMiQBbIOVebxCG MXgEeQ7QW/Qeu8PBG4sm1Vc1vLxh87nppuZPrgztKhhTWFJYuKV+7pS7nh6T51s4qf2NdorTFY9X 1dbvu7poM3nFd93SJU+GplRN8J4eV5+fV9Azo2lZuivx8f6NpTOcTlv1pNPeCbkFRTvmbT6aZJRK wGZOB349CB6rFizk+4qHN9gMmYaAodrQaxD1SXTlekMtkFMvamRDHRZolAxMIzYLAqfhOCmkbdQS kGuXiWj0PNN9wFEAfKOAnIrNvFsrG8RGEYMCOKPoKONhLUUrjC8eongH4EulmF6LsUl0iSHQvNlU lkVC5VhMonIs6umdQCG4U2TTEmNyC2qMcmjYWl7C5Lc8DFopBKTw+yoixdbyclBP280R/piP2gmL F2QZl1hKPBbMH3znWKSMnD7yTnRR5Hn8SDSMH/mEqx1aTR6MdFAt9hzw4FbATT66U5molZyST5oo BS0THQ1StWWuNDuvR9oo6dPSnHWmLFeWksVleeqzxHRi0roAJ1pjvah1Z7gb03DakeEvlDF0BWkg arA30oWnMf2TZvMgd5qM2An0QIGpwFVA5Ht9KpdZyimTsQWe9V/mMn84QhV3GDNZ+17+Ap6yeOwe S2lpSTFlK37rtMraX1+/8cMrjDP/3DN1a6CgMOgP/HB+6yMTuC2Ryb65ng2HpzW14re6fzF5SkNJ 5uuButxi3/rG6T3ubFeSngzvi/bxfF6g7GfANTcCZp4QzoJ3VIZ+qIwTDQ5DeVbJ2JKyuqzKsVVl 7bjF0ORu8iz2rB1rdHJ5dWkJCYn1aZyJBOs4rbPAb/V6kFVGQPlDzDBSVcR4AzEKw4kvFBPFEfpR uancVU78HhmuOUwvlu8aR60ok0GQQoofoDLgBmgOWPGDqmKYQRQt2SQYsJaVZlIc2L0gdhlIE8eI RhVEQJQo2m0URyCR/BPRP7x11aGalnBzuBU7jk5oytOmrprw5jCyz37kyvZbp7W2vVwWGtM7sXnv dEIml4+5MnTr4/ijj6IfVFfNwtZfnsTFV6/q1xqeN6VEv/m4JOgNTnz2lvDGQrctN9+R57r/mWBB 3n7gLYgq+R8Cb4moUSmWsZZk4lrcQFrJBhArcHbdYKzBxnL1Akckk+SSNhGOQ4TwJrgZ8dT2Aotb yymvRyzl1IpvN5/dfgyYHHupPeZ/GFnwBnllaIC7xH99yShk7ANLvnH4Xf5Hwjfg7eaiMiwdRdng rBgAqVlUcimQGQe8cSADAGUdPVfoC9hLMgI5gZJq++SM6pyakib7vOS5KXNdszPafW0F7WNnl8wu 65AWGhdaFyZ3eDty1hnXWTcVbLOmieQn2Y/7SbZD6+e5tKlmEqwFRnCjBJyQgPxaQ54HObLdMSG4 T6W522Ogr2bW3GAo9oh3AuGpAQLanwHCA+VhZynxr6L6N3TWmlgehohJSW8ruLGA5BUUc0F/nr8U YukWb5f37mzR6fZy2WkWeh3btQGfUNHyYRswS2YwUFoWzM4OBoBbmBUDLcwx06ZyR2JpaQJjmRzG L5RZfhR9/czX0Q/2XL9+Dbb94T2svWbjzbeffWzLNQ/NmJl1U+Wiaa4Z6/y94bkrnt29dx9+4JfD 6OKJzS9OEJW7Vv/4/TceW3yiTKwYII1X9q9fUrsszzo+oXJXZM38leMc2Rljf9yzfeAOkLVVwx/x u4WvmKzdoJRLfDKfx1dkVfiCY6ZlTfNVjWnl2xPDSTNTevGmLJMlrbjOlldnE9NiGihokUHYZCfI 1HnFy6QN9A5I1v0qlgs8TjPVsE6eHnXeQYUrJl1MtqhogVhR2zYiWkQj8peVjrVMFJmsAeoQUzbW EdEakauy0lJ+d9vcedEvjwbmZ2rTeia/c8kWfrRz/g8bWttwwR+XH6lpnv+SMs6/PLTniVKlcHnl FQ9OwRxXeSJ6vHf1Zp0eBArLn40rygxMHLz+DE6vqpoVvfTovYOBwpxDj7SvL3TZ83PteSAcUYh3 t/Avg2S1H1oj4AJY+IdKtjapjEunOxeEZ4SjUqRIuEhSJMJD/IIU3MS80hKqTMLUry0Jg94dWwRJ PkUn8LM5wonUMQFbAv+FY204nIWD2I6xsOXSNfx1Q6u5XdMJ3kzwoeja6FqwH1gPM9nFZtJ5aDOH C8DSfajkwiQEOhPBhf2YCCaMcXwmHJ2JHxdhBXPgIX//XDh+tiCIZDb+zlwwzAX+C7suXcPtGlrN X0euiAwfwjfhmw5FhoGLBobTNVcAF1WiRvSG8jDYVl4naGVTijHVFDIpDuLiUwVXiivVlmHLgVhx chYp4AsEf4o/NTPDneMP+SdPVaprW2rTtIKQ01Z3lbzYsMzZ7VmcsyS0ZHKfY1NKb05fed8Ek1Ww SNapM402xZ5SZuP56bOkwsL8GUZp4tj0GWMnEhOEX4Klylpoq7eGdFhnmuGeQZLybLoyE3KjflBS KDOv7MomJuqg48rPgkE/6y+JFIM/ChEm0/agBfywveKDPVzCTCEYQ6LxgGwCL4LSp4wYBENP3VMI qzK9GXw8NOSpIwahIsj8KAPBJzqs2EJNBLUGcInmihkN0dqU+h2tP37xwlN1vZMf+CbfN6+1NTr0 2IPRf7R3rOhuX4S197U8M7vzx23PRo+vXrNlW18fnvT0CzjQ07MqsjvUVX7t3r5NVdvInTdFh67s q1CiZz7CRo+naOhwwwdtj2J9R8fSvoULo1/d81j0q87FSx1Ju+ym/tVrcOWJozi0du22zb290V9F FSKmJR96/JEnJoFFgCwFEhaA5dCAz/bCQUWmPtm3LCoQ44CGqWzqUtWLNRoiy1qJbAc+s8FNspbb DnGqDXhos7hGQ7iAVqHellah9rZIq2h7tZxW1ooc3ihgQTLpMbh+nKCHNEg5sM9cSJj2wXPQVXo4 pRV8QqkwXWgWFgubBI3QpQO/BcIGsE6gZVEoXBEC8oCWpVFiGAQnfOzYMfVLAlsFuheFPV7Ow4HN SgBRWvD63sjmvS+SdCxtjl6KXsQPRDuF00PryZ8iWcAakNuFF55GdphMCTYoVkFv1+fom0mLvT9Z tFoKAunUQbVRNZeerkkLSFxhQCM57NYCE7Ml1Aczuammg/HXSipdsymbRoP0KI2aNFl2xEJJ0Buf xL0TGnWByoRbmMsKwBkAIPqicRiLntCqoCmoBEl6gU1jpPgEGgwdoq8D4G3ViGkkqmhh/CV7HACf s8cB8Df2OAocptPQLA9QNax+IsWAUBUE30Z1e0EbqzYPxmeZjxv3BSFYZf5eLIzAsWgDjtJQTTVg XnoRHQq+2VNnv3hv5Bw++sjD9TPrl8+982fRg5m5/m2LvsAofJXfn9NfOrXoxoXRF7F43ePBcQH8 0sonyyrHCaeTsn3bF/T8sFByvUz40vrEFEN0ZkJ6envknrk9WcmmyBspmTld1IteM/yxMAVqlPlo pdIiYIMs2hw4RbbZs+yl9irbPKlV22qcZ56X28F12nrJOlOvLcHhcAasJD8/OyBqIVcJTjGmfrG/ IFSwskBw2/U2ill9KsWnvtunmizAUgVzkWkwRtkti4Wh35XyuBv4HaevrESYUtZWO3F3y8PRfyzs WN69sB0bHl3/1V7Tpq93rnp6as305qopz3XvvrjCuDwpPzEhZV5nO846fgRndHUuGV/316UL6qY3 fHzHfR9OrZ+6cCHIKOXTA8CnRsglDirecmuddRnpNvAOYMhEYMh1CJvsSEv5BIl0KcBIH8aZ7fwh uiw48nmc6yBOZ9zW5zK5/C4Fsgp84v8fNkuPcxaz+XEuA8EFf4qikOpUUJSUX6h+jNl1SNmo7HNg /21LLr0S3YH73sa47a4nf7txQ+vJnc8+u/sPbStXkr+8HD08LwS8Eiprj77wxr5zNcU5l67PL5/6 KeULwBF/H+BIh/Y8IweRaBYJKLBjSiYVXlHEQpBw2iCWeCRBAmmNwWTAomzDTLjAkqrCBUBMuDAT LhpMMqwBoAoXAJ8x4aIAEy68XH951Uy4KsKUccCDBGlaxXI+LHSi4ZOHv2/Ix/1h6G+ciW7C6YFo 90Dkzdj8+2H+Mrr3AMyVTt1Op06IBgclTiMhrlFHnfYjw79XnIx+XTqTDkw+piIu/I8I+H5cT3wR 0xPaUUvxgaI472NmUl0LJSEsAZYBYS/fHzGR7ZENJ7lnBE90/kCkBCavrkOYwOjw4QEuKNF1OJib KJklIkmCFuIRQZKJDbzxY0xfwYouHmK8CzqV6Tg48omq4xAjA2VeJZMFcFamOSGYA22ZQBeO1gMp FUOTgZM4G9iu37FHAaBSFIAYReGlIAcwVgkJgEpaBtDnUYChQfg3isZ1py9SjEIVoQqg7CpqgyDb SJEBeTxLiTDhZCT55Enyl5PkrUiOcDpyhNQCPm4EI/sHho/Filfmi0VOyxVjybBCK+nmam2cQObG co0sJwE5uXeZ5AJwhkkuAFHGgwB8eZgigVsxwnHni80R2D5h2bRIMSWQB9wUb9Bjh2mRP0QOnThB pp04cRf/0F13XWqH+bwCumQtm88/lf5kuQXPB2ss58rj5Hq5W94p/1HWmLBWTsfJBPK+cjkul4O6 Olwn1+jm48W61WiDZIZgcgc+BQ7uQRA3ST5IdGDjb9BiicTIC4yq1ZoMbqhcKIhvgtdeBTTCEsdo AHRiYgcI/49EGqHNCLWorWRE+vp7iER59UI4XKzG7oxCNFMDLsKxYxsjSfwxCGc3RsJJ1EtYtdrj wRpGNlyChbXR4cjB24Fwr5+LLCV33h/VgIfwD8g/V6vczK8DbAlo7WHC8aA/gBc/VVTOQxqTBlyf /5UO+TymQ8TLgnc2DEGoj2oQmi6mzMWvG5p5knwqnL74njon4QLMSY/rlHktWjyOjBNKtStJB7dS 6ND2QxmhX+jV6prlFu1cHdfF9XFrgcRawskiQYRn7hmvUGHgmZOGeDNfzc/m4aPRyRwGv0KrA74E sVQMTAXZUHpcPpXpzL6oBQgW6SGWf0OgksDKJDHBZClOtN5oMrqMTUZw9pjksVyMAHEhUDFBY/5/ 92ooK4AzExdTzXLDKKSBiI74NWB9aD41LqrUL4RI/lCA7+FJuA3AA108DreBT0l5ZDUKrwZBhjwH 1WsYe4QLJ6ML10UXH8VGfAveghMEbuhObtnFCDDGCW5iXMuBJUIy9imKXuPSBDQ1mhmaTs0qjWad iE2YiC5sFwNitThLvBJ3iP24V9TpMS+SuRhSkaDUJXCJeUnEBBb0LZN0AKDWA54hABdVhZwA7Hb+ 35Tjh0qNqlKZZVdVInidgH89wz9QhCpGMA+KjhAmc4Rhn7CkNEngGfYhrarKHwAxJcmzi2Gsyh8A qvwBoMofPcWmxi8fZSug0jEa+xEYQi4lhn+K5NWrIAgG11xFMSjLcX+PTDqKS8gNR4XAxd8Ipy8p /DHwdNYMfyC8DXn6RKiT/kLJ4BEPWNNZE1GimKxPts7Bc4RZmnZdq6HV0p4wK9Fsh34mJYmyksyW tE7eYCcpATvxBGRtEqyPzTXJDrpTXSoAn8TV6odxtXpOCTC9uibLlIVp8jWUxaUzRk23m6yU4U2s /GMC9AHMzpi6M1XuO+ujEQqsGJiOmX1gN8pW2GG1q+7Od+JCR4IZskPIYobcBhLS53Uuapt/6aH7 osNz53Z2zG/Fwj0PDk+NDn3wUTSCpXffxRohuyv67pEj0Xc6Fy/pXrQIu48exp6lC7uXRTpxBp4A Ad270T+BQ11GoznqBd0BfGmGevCflaLxtolpDbaGtCbjbNNikyY5gDRmDdFo5KSAlpMlk8flIRa7 qqZ7odw9ygB/q+gYd8UzqOfitvpTJoXMJDsYn630mDwhD0nW2GSm1iG1quIagBhbyYytYKyyFQAq WwGgPg6Ajxmp5OXuy0JNvanzFLPAXbQezNwQViGMhycsA88ClH/xJfk7aiZN/92DJ0/i27c9W9sc frW0rGjTgheeWH8HBCG8adFPJk2fHgG7XFhU/uT26aszXSmRn/r8RT0xb/uuGA4vKbMknAYV3vG4 PK3GVGurTZuLW0xttpV4GenQLtZdg9fqLNQQmpFZ4wwQplHpXmxWoMRJhKQAc3goqhUPZ7GD3wme z7dKGsWuIZUylIFJrYHVIQwGsxt0PHV4HEyWkzmZYpmzof+J0VTjP2EUUosj4NL5whBGj6C1QsUr MDDNdTNLmQR2EqwkdW4ux3+xaG/EXb8rOhw1Rj87iR/afqh2xryHd3UWBnzrmj47teDmsYU+0hQZ EE57C0vuvfqht8rwI8qijLTEyKuewvwVVINugziOQBxXBAyN/DElVxjXdmMAUPZSuU5iPJXI9g62 t+vpcRsLd8BeuZA3RbK58qTcpExXpr9cKjWPSwi6SvPrpRpzXUKNqz6nOr+VNKc0u5oLr0xekrLY tcTX4d/k6HX1uvvy+wq3Wb2yYjSXSXQHJtLizOXTRI8nK8CSnhAzenLtTqYAnFTdALUgs2mxI4+T 1hxUdQLAOQVaC0AH9xWbinuLidwzNl7ai1VdYiUXGk/ShDFNLttbLXNyuy1LczdY1uXeaNmWe6fl 7lxtuI2VRBnjwy5elsmktXyabVLrfFD2U5PLtBQBCalY1QEKDwKZUdf0hzseig5vNa7CudcdeaVz UcO+hSefxxXf3IfFxcbm6F9vfeCXHRuUL2Y+/mP8kzlPTlBqKyZ8u2DJzjWLFjhtTlv+y48891VF wee17Td0h3tSjbn2ggOUavDhvwTZ0KA1SjLmgyLU7EyyS26UOTQPQ2qINGMb2IgLipZiiZ/XCEkf ysw6SjNBorqUjpkKBuBrpoLZEXo9AMNwBBwENS/hC5/3RXxnqOirzi3lRyhGfBn54mTkC5iJ5+J7 gmeAzmw+dKHcAjPToxeVJ6dyS7kNHGfAOsLzRBAkvS4RJ3NJQrKUrMvj8qQ83QRSzhXzAalCLtGO 1zWQar5amiZXaRt0zXguzHyuMEfTJjdrF+MespjvEXrkxdS34tdIm+XV2s26MXobvFVjEwXAAeaY PyWzPSSWZAJLBcGFGBTqLRNQQGxA1eJGtFYU0WpwikLGdmO/kReXGsxfQuWJro8muEDNMfmjKWEM 9pLWXuB/Cab/NbdEf/Be9NfRV9+OrnsZl+MAqHxcBj6hn//9pQKwoPn8G5fS+Q9Bg3VDPS2NX4+y Iau1TGnTa3lvstbu5X3gKojNBWxfyPZtxhnp8wuWGTvSVhZu0m609aZtKtASKXdikUWxEIvFLTWm 4tTUpJCbHztZAg/fBOVHS06QLRQ8RDW5wADK+xRQE1jEidJ0EIUD1RGzoFRSFAtzW1gJNuYwUlvB pCbWaQF+C5sYXH5escsyjNVg71ZIiLmCoSAHquFbZouYjgAHVWweI9F1jUmBHpmLShl9JzgNwGk6 iTKVjuV1dExsdcyC60CYxWYKwx4YFfZbR2XIaE8NuDNQlI9/oHRBfRqfmjSmsT0UzCwQBYbV8iCc An3pDcYyRCCXkA7LLPveejxnYVepSWE+7bnk5lz/xpl3/m7F4iU4/dHC/NzeifWHO7Vlry1et08J VT7X8ln1jK6+qxc9erVlojXRdere/vsKC91SmjI7KdGck/W8KTPHP2bv8mgaMIMtIbGzuaNzOvDA UeCBPdB9lIDc2KrkBUjQNMFe5K4mNaYGu+KeY11q7Zc2peqNsphYaeH1OF0RtTrJRmlK8UIBsMig aFOobotnk87FA3SopFHkIijLwx4qrCDSQKz47QB8o+QxC7YHmkBCGcSYIrM4AMwZ3EE9ArGZwrB3 6mnUS+kGwIdq5K9nF8P4S0ZsAC4oOnqnXqR3wvgcmycAX0FUDEd2QJNJnGAxao24D5Sk1H9gLgQY ubj/ADVdDY3faRHXqlbnNBa1crunsWrqk0vad9XoBwYbD6w8+fHxG26b+ePapjV1P9pPym5+f1pj YyEkFG2R30+eFX0t+smp304dF9mSmQoBNkbLhv/CfcNfjTzoaWWaydvoJT6cYcx3ZCaNx0HjeEcw qQ43aquNjY7JSW242bgMLzZuxGuMCWazLaTnPR5niJNNXhareVkbzkgp+904ot9VxjD83uJNZFyd mCIzfpdBGgDBTAJkZrZkhjLwsb5lmJK3ZsQxdZYlOwFro1Od0IsDuc5YDY76qSNZTpVpIdNbVsJ9 s+An7Rteqq1rwoX/6Dg6XdvyzJwHjz79aPk6f16tXTulsHhqbe2fb8NWPK4053RV7ZuvvfRWepLd bwHeXA68WRXjTaJkVTiLUse5G52VqbXuVrFb7DXLVkwsQtJkIzTtpVcKWovtP+ga1rVFnBkKUyyU R7xM5TBDg8zsKGMklM/4lFkl4M0vlUKqOGgz4IiG2avyaQrjzxTWTZGSIiVRRQJprKjio0+T2NMk FvkCngHREmv3obDYLAEBYL91FCcC442KS31gzqgaoYEC9brKIcZXFYc3g1io1mD9FZYSbnTpiK8a nDGw9NRfZ9RUP93ZuqNhcHDa+qn3D+y4o+nRtVOuwAFs2fXuFdOasnLwmYvD5NoM559f+vVvp9J4 oGf4E76D3wwdqS50SsnJ5n2GIn6CoSK9im8wNKTPNTQ5egwdiesNG9ONuMLlMqVOtNOew0/Vrhyd ThMygZB6mL73MEZMplgGvJPmZCeCKgeT/vNKNePF3RALuCAa4FyQlYRTtDkHOnFSrAyNVoY2K+NP K0OblZ23QgeV2GzdOuL6A5JU159qYmgspPrWx7xUSLqFsSfeXsFaNL1uNZqy2mkjFPRf8B1DL04q DexuWf2Xsdr2kyuin0dPYd/5D//+DL7tjjsP6knK0rvHFhXNK3gltxRcezvwaGX022/yb3/4wA2U O6NtfBXgzAu+qV8pnJgwKb+4YHxRtdyQMC2/sqChaB4OC3MdPXi50OPYLPS6LRmC1WPPVdJ5CNzV nCYFlBTKYhqNTuEMYybbNSYRi57MYsaqVqonqbfEAIopCigqNpxITAIevaDM+G/wsvPf+bjYVRwq Jj6GZh/jS19KkpnyMUTEUSWL8nESUwwQcsCrk1gXI4VFBsN+69h44EU1J22QiH++awqZJfQx0jBW zjIjz3fb08Amfoe1QXN8l7Wj0ej5tp/M1I451dVxjdeb3nzveuD0KZOfnd95fR3o3oZrlXsP3HD3 zMf6o2eiF5ITj1mDY/JyrqpeUl2FIY+35/S0qY05uUVDb5DOjLTXTg4eD4H+PQp+ajtoGAcuURI4 u8O+1g5dmlJlAm/E2CB9rzahSRjWC0ntHgC0x+HzeO5lSLFQBCJ+lEqhvguLkSlWVWuYEZOH98Fe Mmt4UQkwu8gUFWK+Bro1yZXUkUTMOqZLwKgBDXTMHlIYnBEnRIiqPQQg1oBqYBfDWLWHAFxgjhMA 4F3TtxnYI2D8N2YYKcDUvWEH7ROOf1TL+B2VxPwdMI8VTCUxhWQZaWYCj1s1jw473z5oTUpe0DD9 x9MHB1sHFz39C7J5+vbs/LxpE4Z+AYbwlbqZb4P1I2gfmMDrhT+BI6xBjygJuJoAesqg4wE88X7o 2N4LmB1SChiuOni2MMipABZ4ZqgoDK1+TugQBk7FHf0shlARAhFCDCGxrGIcIXBCRQgAlCwsVTzM KCnskEYQED7DNLDvjI953SFWScbQPcnBOvH1v/+9fnBQSDpxMQt+cAN89Evgo33ARzp0UanOJX/E f5I5GUPTJ04jLkMh9huKIMc2W7eMbMS0IRo7WUb8EMuI03S4AL3nEAtArqCXNvHBws8ruYw3kMEN OXEicWz9HFs/x9OJUxj2TljJyKJjXtHIokfWqrIDXMoqJrBq9ggY/4NxAQUYFwg3jhQNgBViXEAT zeDJqqk66MlRw39Imf9dTZlHWL4c0nYj6XJ+37dRZePgIHGdjfwTf9YXvUm0DTmJPzIE2HoOUHY1 YItDP1ByCMYSpdxexBYY818Yj1IYpMPZD00E8TUCECMsZtfDWF0aADHPD7OlwfjbwxRNeAd/maxs QYykEEGxJvCrBwdhKqou0CSCPvfhU0oDl8nlJWQm5FW7q7OfydcczsJZrrRUKbEyN4NPE7A5VVIK sauwqFApbCrsLRT+8+QLqYpPpBxayOwiTqLaGjPPA+b4OfOYATivWFhYXEQZHLMWATj6NVMQAJxT fGwxzATiTnOWLjX22wTGESaGMHBTAGEmp5nhgr7HzN4D49+pQZU5mz7ezPwbOPotezwD6NMBuMTY AYBhxUOtrdnlZHiGpmS40cleQ2Gx2elMjRMFgFghLpVdDGOV8QBQqUMBVf2kaumbYEwDOhVQoDEV oE6XWTFvMXNmP4Tz8Y/Kgeb4UOVI2oV3+RKaUYUPZI5DFaCboP8WQi7WCw0EHlFQ0OIMOmpkSPWV XfWi2N6uSRw02BNbZjTe38jxKjj9XqrA9i1a/UDO6sErj+wjm2u35foKGicmTkyPBMnm+q25Ph9V anx4c93MjuaO5vcgsRqzKsBJDpz3r1YFOhH+R1YlcZRVARqAhYmbkGg84fo+pTCIy2gTAhRWcim+ RxkTSseYSWHU/F5jwrgSTMNlK6JGVSPm5X9rTBjJ/gtbotLmv7YlDO1gSqj/+gG/CjCug4rARcU5 wRgwB2wTHA3GanO1rcEhmUIybw9xWogC1RoKAGoNBYCvqZsKgWFKMhNQanTi0SuoGuZbgdPD/Ne3 mbzAFV8y0wEA5fOYBZ/IXNs9yaZkV3IoeWUybwVFBB4bkxy6B981RXRQSsbay5nrJTIPF5oQokoy JaAI3i/sWfWAngN4a9KIBmO8PsosUzyycgKrJYyqGYz0kEIikF8V/fSvZ6Of4cSzf8VJx5+88+6f PHnXHU+RMdGvoi/gCmyBfxOjJ6JfvfX662/97q03AaNHo138HsAozQtkKFnFpNxe7K4idfZKdwvk BK6RNqdq4zkBAXICsk4fywlAKgDQwixqLCfAePfI8GtxJ+lcrGgPOGFYHWlv+nesXvgvkwOgbP57 yQFVGwGtVX6mgKqN/ltZgpgZvFxlYBrnP+QJRhTLv+YJrphaebBrzi11g4MNz/W89MHxnbtnPNoA aYL7BkjFjg+uqJ+RnRstEP65NtQc/W30i5dOTSmPbM90/l7VJ9xqcDSs0NVjQwYzeATgDZjA56jS mgSZ1ppHesbOKbks34Jsiq3XRvQappA1jAc1zG2iMMQbTojzVbcBgJhJjWVe4tobTnypWOjjZGiP AUwz1U3zA4zpAfinmijYkXCZP0f7DDSXAuoY0tgsl8I64eEHApdVL7dam99YOudhCFV7n2obW1DA 7dHK0ycO/YUPPza3QYB+P2gJGP6YexOylCV4ljJHJHKKnSSnZMv5mcVyRWalPC1zgRB2zPK0+GcX rxSWOzrcXf7FxbaNQr+lz70ht8+3E+8wbHVuz70d35OiQ8akPD6d25IBTE3ZMiMje5IajyksEQJh 2CRO9hhphhAMLmnOY5ije7E5LyXINEQSi0+TIAqDoIjpUAiYLjxNL0mCO1XFQgGqM+HXYinIk6QB In0eVysj4QJcwZS5LSYJIwKgYhju+VbJYWplVyyv2R7sDwoapkQ0LD2pAWsM5NwWYInIy+lI1qnu 86kJcqolRsJjcOZYJzoNkWmCi2ZwoGJAm0+DgZxsiI5ZySCeZFB/wABVg0QH1Azojnsz8qfNv52i bXu7a/PN2dnLc68N3rapfPy4n17Z9Uq1tvbVRUt3+fIXBK71XT91Kq68+4UJ3terGptaKjMykuQk Y86dV9VsLPKXjfW+GKxrvKLG63Xok7TpdfVA60nDn5OIcD/8IvaAUqkXnNB2yenMmkkGnVZISUmE ZFdjWn8aMaKb0ySDmbE2JGCADGbm81EYXBanVtIoBnMZRNfvKhaqwDVu6oDFZCHO3nA6xt6aVMre GvYMOPo31SBoEinmNTtSRzE35GRUj8QPP1IDh4P2qJdAl7AfkKkmw4LQVQMNwKz/6XL+gUSCPxj7 1IH+/kF8Q3SzlOSY3jimywG/1rEeeZnMvB9Pjj5/f5RrXeTLzUqRKdfvB4s2B2QemhYVm05M1mzU cESwy4IF8lxY+v5E1wVmlWjUejk0/VJJYyZMYhHpaN8BXEmmfqkLykzYBaWE+QqqB8GcMrRXDUL/ cwwKOa8PmWIHIOYExpJfcTzDCVXDA/A3Ve1KTGromGkSAP7ONIm0fXQMqrp1o7Cvop4pXuitYhEo yxtkBwHhI8i2lPBzBtt/tmzghUGzM6VlZt1PGwY3NzS9+Rr0Od3QvMFXkDttAlcJOIYWDb4fcCyi W5TJ2XyeWMqXi1P4OlHME8oFRZghdEC/shOu5J3QiJ+LcrhxqIyrR1O5tXgjkZBA1kJNRyASwbTh DroIZXOZHn7L3QN/xYFHt8BPaODHBAncYm4tx3OpVOFw12lAUKEV4HxY7X0I0W5zaryhmAP/oZrD 6jlQyeH7oxU/j4Z+g+di4IRLj/Dhoe3cBpgN/P0amGoYalhfH0USIJfqEOhY+PpyLR6cBqp/tlN5 MHBpXAHOJ3lcFp8tZEo+XQBPEKpxgzAHt/JtwhzdCrKQ75J65C7tlboN+AdkNd8nbZLXaDfq0vV0 +RonlK+QbJaJWrqCvRZCyHjtChBAf0Lnhx/uO5mthyADGGqX0QwVrJVGDsFc3me6DwC1DgoAdA0x R4fVs8XrY006YGShoBKrdAEwqtAFjo4P++LFrgQodiWIpdF3fhb9IPrRT6Nvv/AKTrwXpx+nqOLC QxRdD3CddKPyNBH8GUprDbpZmcyzjpsmsUPsFUWZ0wjJXKIwBddxrWgO3gC/P9bQVQtOnuPr0BQe fuMPP9cgetINgSj0VtIGiGNKRozW9YzaArpFNsmY4xP4Gn4xv5YX+Osk8xna8wGEhqIdqN9Y5Byj NJTOWemOLgRoHel78bVo1W/wHDyXD1/U4N/xOUMvcBV07pBi4D6CucvwS/bxdmk89EvWczXSfG62 1CH1c72SVqPhJokC9PBMgs5ViYPWDZ7Iu3QuXUjXrlup69cJ5AYtLTOfAbNAm99gNlR1McXFflJL f7xlxx7uo6GN5KbI9dzSyGrywE1c8L5tQxDT0GwN+wxPg7948n0fmCjE8+pfPaB/8cDynb9yQP/G QSrklj2QLc2Ev2kQ/wsG9K8XjP7LBepfLRiPqlENmoKmolpUjxrQNHQF/H6kCc1AM9Es1Az8Pwe1 ojb4UcB89lcaKI6ssNGPCN3PqHr23PqWyb6Wxau7Oq/q/L+Lv6J6CmVuZHN0cmVhbQplbmRvYmoK MTMgMCBvYmoKMTMwNzgKZW5kb2JqCjE0IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UeXBlIC9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRvciAv QXNjZW50IDEwMDUgL0NhcEhlaWdodCA3MjcgL0Rlc2NlbnQgLTIxMCAvRmxhZ3MKMzIgL0ZvbnRC Qm94IFstNDk1IC0zMDMgMTQ0NiAxMDAxXSAvRm9udE5hbWUgL0RUWkpWQStWZXJkYW5hIC9JdGFs aWNBbmdsZQowIC9TdGVtViAwIC9BdmdXaWR0aCA1MDggL01heFdpZHRoIDE1MjEgL1hIZWlnaHQg NTQ1IC9Gb250RmlsZTIgMTIgMCBSID4+CmVuZG9iagoxNSAwIG9iagpbIDM1MiAwIDAgMCAwIDAg MCAyNjkgNDU0IDQ1NCAwIDAgMzY0IDQ1NCAzNjQgMCAwIDYzNiA2MzYgNjM2IDYzNiA2MzYgNjM2 CjYzNiA2MzYgNjM2IDAgMCA4MTggMCA4MTggMCAxMDAwIDY4NCA2ODYgNjk4IDc3MSA2MzIgNTc1 IDAgNzUxIDQyMSAwIDY5MyA1NTcKODQzIDc0OCA3ODcgNjAzIDAgNjk1IDY4NCA2MTYgMCAwIDk4 OSAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCA2MDEgNjIzIDUyMSA2MjMgNTk2CjAgNjIzIDYzMyAyNzQgMCA1 OTIgMjc0IDk3MyA2MzMgNjA3IDYyMyAwIDQyNyA1MjEgMzk0IDYzMyA1OTIgODE4IDAgNTkyIDUy NQpdCmVuZG9iago4IDAgb2JqCjw8IC9UeXBlIC9Gb250IC9TdWJ0eXBlIC9UcnVlVHlwZSAvQmFz ZUZvbnQgL0RUWkpWQStWZXJkYW5hIC9Gb250RGVzY3JpcHRvcgoxNCAwIFIgL1dpZHRocyAxNSAw IFIgL0ZpcnN0Q2hhciAzMiAvTGFzdENoYXIgMTIyIC9FbmNvZGluZyAvTWFjUm9tYW5FbmNvZGlu Zwo+PgplbmRvYmoKMTYgMCBvYmoKKFdvcmtib29rMSkKZW5kb2JqCjE3IDAgb2JqCihNYWMgT1Mg WCAxMC42LjcgUXVhcnR6IFBERkNvbnRleHQpCmVuZG9iagoxOCAwIG9iagooT3dlbiBPJ01hbGxl eSkKZW5kb2JqCjE5IDAgb2JqCigpCmVuZG9iagoyMCAwIG9iagooTWljcm9zb2Z0IEV4Y2VsKQpl bmRvYmoKMjEgMCBvYmoKKEQ6MjAxMTA2MjQwNzI1MzRaMDAnMDAnKQplbmRvYmoKMjIgMCBvYmoK KCkKZW5kb2JqCjIzIDAgb2JqClsgKCkgXQplbmRvYmoKMSAwIG9iago8PCAvVGl0bGUgMTYgMCBS IC9BdXRob3IgMTggMCBSIC9TdWJqZWN0IDE5IDAgUiAvUHJvZHVjZXIgMTcgMCBSIC9DcmVhdG9y CjIwIDAgUiAvQ3JlYXRpb25EYXRlIDIxIDAgUiAvTW9kRGF0ZSAyMSAwIFIgL0tleXdvcmRzIDIy IDAgUiAvQUFQTDpLZXl3b3JkcwoyMyAwIFIgPj4KZW5kb2JqCnhyZWYKMCAyNAowMDAwMDAwMDAw IDY1NTM1IGYgCjAwMDAwMTk4MTIgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAwMjUzNiAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDA1 NTA4IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDAwMjIgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAwMjUxNiAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAw MDAyNjQwIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDU0NzMgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxOTM5MSAwMDAwMCBuIAow MDAwMDAyNzM4IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMDU0NTIgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAwNTU5MSAwMDAwMCBu IAowMDAwMDA1NjQxIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTg4MTAgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxODgzMiAwMDAw MCBuIAowMDAwMDE5MDcwIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTk1NjMgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxOTU5MSAw MDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDE5NjQzIDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTk2NzUgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAxOTY5 NCAwMDAwMCBuIAowMDAwMDE5NzI4IDAwMDAwIG4gCjAwMDAwMTk3NzAgMDAwMDAgbiAKMDAwMDAx OTc4OSAwMDAwMCBuIAp0cmFpbGVyCjw8IC9TaXplIDI0IC9Sb290IDExIDAgUiAvSW5mbyAxIDAg UiAvSUQgWyA8NzhhZjI2MjU5OGE2MjFiM2U0YmUxNTdmNmIyOTNmNWI+Cjw3OGFmMjYyNTk4YTYy MWIzZTRiZTE1N2Y2YjI5M2Y1Yj4gXSA+PgpzdGFydHhyZWYKMTk5ODcKJSVFT0YK --Apple-Mail-13--118723366 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
--Apple-Mail-13--118723366-- --Apple-Mail-12--118723366-- From general-return-3930-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 08:01:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FD0462C4 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56403 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:01:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54870 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54577 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 08:01:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:01:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:01:16 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2444119pwj.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.79.1 with SMTP id g1mr620763wfl.121.1308902455100; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:00:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-70-95-55-11.hawaii.res.rr.com [70.95.55.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm1788801wfk.21.2011.06.24.01.00.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Trademarks and Derivative Works Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-14--117230071 From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C208101086D60@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:00:51 -0700 Cc: "trademarks@apache.org" Message-Id: <1B066F6B-4EC8-43E2-9927-6A048B0D9D83@apache.org> References: <04f001cc2c4f$1815c460$48414d20$@com> <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C208101086D60@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-14--117230071 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Unfortunately what you're saying is that you would only approve of = companies that build their products on top of Apache's release and = doesn't modify the Apache release.=20 No, that isn't what I'm saying. I'm saying that if they want to call = what they are shipping Hadoop, it has to be an Apache release. Derived = works may be "powered by Hadoop." Please see the original proposal here: = http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop > This interpretation of "powered by Hadoop" would unfortunately lead = to as many problems as it attempts to solve. > First, many choose Cloudera's release because they sell commercial = support. So in choosing Cloudera's release, they would lose the ability = to say "powered by Hadoop". > This diminishes the branding message. No, you misread the proposal. They *would* be able to say their product = was "powered by Hadoop". What would be prohibited would be calling a = derivative work "Hadoop." > (I'm not forgetting about Yahoo!, but are they releasing their own = version as well?) Not for the last year. > I hope that you start to see the dangers on taking a narrow approach = in how you define Hadoop.=20 I'm trying to learn. -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-14--117230071-- From general-return-3931-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 08:05:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CDC66030 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59053 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:05:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58827 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58818 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 08:05:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:05:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:04:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3646688bwz.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.133.27 with SMTP id d27mr1754289bkt.69.1308902674217; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:04:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.118.210 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:04:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:04:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517477f86f13cfc04a670a691 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517477f86f13cfc04a670a691 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I independently counted all of the votes as well and came to the same conclusions that Owen did. Even considering those who voted with a different subject line, the outcome was indeed the same. Thanks to all who participated! -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, > I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method > missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the > outcome. > > With the binding votes from the PMC: > > > > First Round 2 4 4 4 5 6 6 1 Second Round (Drop 6) 2 5 4 4 5 6 Third > Round (Drop 4) 2 8 5 7 > > So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached > below, show the counted votes. > > With all of the binding and non-binding votes: > > > > First Round 1 1 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 4 Second Round(Drop 1) 2 13 4 > 23 5 27 6 5 Third Round (Drop 6) 2 15 4 24 5 29 Forth Round > (Drop 2) 4 35 5 31 > > -- Owen > > > > > --001517477f86f13cfc04a670a691-- From general-return-3932-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 08:26:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B3A369CD for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91413 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90574 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 08:26:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90556 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 08:26:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:26:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:26:27 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so2189113pzk.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.44.130 with SMTP id e2mr1585717pbm.515.1308903966673; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-70-95-55-11.hawaii.res.rr.com [70.95.55.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm1889725pbd.44.2011.06.24.01.26.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:26:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-15--115718501 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:26:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-15--115718501 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be = called Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After = some cleanup from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good = base. I'd like a vote to approve the content (at the current revision = 12) and put the content on our web site. Binding +1: Arun, Chris, Ian, Owen Binding -1: Doug, Eli, Todd Non-binding +1: Allen, Cos, Matt, Steve Non-binding -1: Ted, Jeff Well, technically this passed, but we've been encouraged to discuss it = more. Personally, I'd love to get more feedback from Larry about how we = should accomplish the goal of getting packagers to either use Apache = Hadoop releases or only use "powered by Hadoop." Clearly there is a = significant difference of opinion about the value of that goal that is = unlikely to be resolved by debate. Having a clearly stated trademark statement on the website will help = significantly with contacting organizations that are mis-using the = trademark, so I don't want to postpone this too long. Let's discuss it = for a week and then call a new vote if we think that is merited. -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-15--115718501-- From general-return-3933-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 13:43:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE3296694 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13971 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 13:43:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13845 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 13:43:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13837 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 13:43:42 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:43:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.65.8.158]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:43:41 +0000 Message-ID: <4E04948B.4050802@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:43:39 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/24/2011 10:26 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Having a clearly stated trademark statement on the website will help > significantly with contacting organizations that are mis-using the > trademark, so I don't want to postpone this too long. Let's discuss > it for a week and then call a new vote if we think that is merited. Might it be better to improve the existing Apache trademark policy page? http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ This way all projects can benefit, e.g., Pig, Hive, Zookeeper, etc. We might, e.g., propose more examples of acceptable and not-acceptable uses of Apache marks there, etc. We can work with trademarks@ to build a library of boilerplate letters to be sent to folks whose use Apache marks in objectionable ways. Doug From general-return-3934-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 15:48:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 151866EB1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28833 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 15:48:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28740 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 15:48:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28723 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 15:48:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:48:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:47:51 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3364152vws.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.72.230 with SMTP id g6mr4762847vdv.163.1308930449059; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:47:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.111.166 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:47:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501601173b1a004a6771e96 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec501601173b1a004a6771e96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So there is a significant difference between the community of developers and the PMC here and we definitely don't really have a consensus. One good suggestion that I had was from Eli. It sounds to me like his objection (and possibly related objections) to the logo that I proposed was based on the fact that the logo that I proposed matched the color scheme on our web site. In a side conversation (that obviously didn't officially happen, being off-list), it seemed that he would be willing to push for support for a logo with more flexibility in the way that core logo is encircled. In our conversation, it seems that a significant portion of the divergence of opinion may simply be that different groups are attuned to their own company or local community color palettes which makes logos tuned to other color combinations much less attractive. How about we have a logo family where the yellow elephant and "Powered by" text is the core and the circle or its graphical equivalent is optional? The intent would be to allow designers the freedom to help the logo conform to their local look while maintaining a core identity? Can we get consensus around that? On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, > I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method > missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the > outcome. > > With the binding votes from the PMC: > > > > First Round 2 4 4 4 5 6 6 1 Second Round (Drop 6) 2 5 4 4 5 6 Third > Round (Drop 4) 2 8 5 7 > > So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached > below, show the counted votes. > > With all of the binding and non-binding votes: > > > > First Round 1 1 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 4 Second Round(Drop 1) 2 13 4 > 23 5 27 6 5 Third Round (Drop 6) 2 15 4 24 5 29 Forth Round > (Drop 2) 4 35 5 31 > > -- Owen > > > > > --bcaec501601173b1a004a6771e96-- From general-return-3935-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 16:47:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C782675A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7637 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 16:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7575 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 16:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7566 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 16:47:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:49 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so2858411wwi.29 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.229.7 with SMTP id g7mr3026082weq.98.1308934048771; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.30.212 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:47:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > So there is a significant difference between the community of developers = and > the PMC here and we definitely don't really have a consensus. > > One good suggestion that I had was from Eli. =A0It sounds to me like his > objection (and possibly related objections) to the logo that I proposed w= as > based on the fact that the logo that I proposed matched the color scheme = on > our web site. =A0In a side conversation (that obviously didn't officially > happen, being off-list), it seemed that he would be willing to push for > support for a logo with more flexibility in the way that core logo is > encircled. > Hey Ted, Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3936-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 16:54:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26B736851 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16412 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 16:54:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16365 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 16:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16355 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 16:54:51 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:54:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:54:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:54:49 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <420C1431-457C-4D2E-B3DB-618C9B69D8CC@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices > modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is > accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC > did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point. Clearly the PMC is full of circle-phobes. From general-return-3937-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:08:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45CBE60F9 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40252 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:08:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39892 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39629 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:08:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:08:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:07:54 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2801463pwj.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.48.129 with SMTP id l1mr1820656pbn.112.1308935253926; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-70-95-55-11.hawaii.res.rr.com [70.95.55.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v6sm2188574pbh.22.2011.06.24.10.07.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <4E04948B.4050802@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:07:27 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4E04948B.4050802@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Might it be better to improve the existing Apache trademark policy = page? When the project is having trouble agreeing, reaching agreement at the = foundation level seems unrealistic. Let's reach a workable solution for = Hadoop, see how it functions in practice, iterate and improve, and then = we can consider pushing it to the entire foundation. -- Owen= From general-return-3938-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 21:08:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC7167E9 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13437 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:08:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13343 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:08:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13335 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 21:08:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:08:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sureshms@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:08:32 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5OL81m3026057 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:08:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308949681; bh=OIhBzCELR4pdao+G6gUwCcuXG1AMeOfbIr8k+ZbFDuw=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=t2gZZuuMfcuAN0++PkZrErwG1pvQysp4saZz9sr/9Nin3a2GlcY/YJxtm1LecB7BG Syel1EHoFVQi1pRYMNHZOLEPDc0cgY4oy7XhwybF8FxHfVWDUI5m7RISe2Wa5M8nP1 gQrvHD18vdZBOfHFo4EwYcAIOfijeIzK+knopDgc= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:08:00 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:07:57 -0700 Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: Acws+RPlMNysOuyuR6ehLH41N0fBKgFubad4 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Arun, I can also help you with managing the release for HDFS. On 6/17/11 7:15 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG N= R > effort. >=20 > Are folks ok with this? >=20 > thanks, > Arun >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 > On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >=20 >> NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for >> users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. >>=20 >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >>=20 >>>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>>=20 From general-return-3939-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 22:05:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7675D66F8 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83074 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83011 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83003 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:05:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:05:19 +0000 Received: by fxg7 with SMTP id 7so273653fxg.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:05:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.136 with SMTP id 8mr5100245far.16.1308953118154; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.100.7 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:05:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:05:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1. I'd be happy to help in any way possible. thanks mahadev On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > +1. Arun, I can also help you with managing the release for HDFS. > > > On 6/17/11 7:15 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > >> I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG NR >> effort. >> >> Are folks ok with this? >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >> >>> NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for >>> users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: >>> >>>>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>>>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>>> > > -- thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar From general-return-3940-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:29:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EC15600E for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97691 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:29:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97615 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97604 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:29:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:29:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.173 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of arunc@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:29:01 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5P0ScAT056459 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1308961718; bh=YhGKVnDHShkvdKLE9H+3+jr0rBYGd1C2OMg0tgP6SXY=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=BmrFP/tTiLXp5GfxRajsTgvngF6UKfdigDQJJfph+LMzyOD1sikkgR32Ei6HZXKPh 4LInP2eRwGvqTfIFbrOlsyQ6xdlB5joNLYPLf1pw95fheyeCqWqhoCRNYiQtNhX7Hf 9fvyYwJU+Gg9Nob0YD+KYvT+3mu6M+4GPViIh8tU= Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:28:37 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:28:33 -0700 Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Topic: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release Thread-Index: AcwyztMW3IYuYrP1ReWRoElgPrT3/Q== Message-ID: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks Suresh! Todd - I'd appreciate if you could help on some of the HBase/Performance ji= ras... thanks! Sent from my iPhone On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:09 PM, "Suresh Srinivas" wro= te: > +1. Arun, I can also help you with managing the release for HDFS. >=20 >=20 > On 6/17/11 7:15 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: >=20 >> I volunteer to be the RM for the release since I've been leading the NG = NR >> effort. >>=20 >> Are folks ok with this? >>=20 >> thanks, >> Arun >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >> On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:45 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote= : >>=20 >>> NG map reduce is a huge deal both in terms of making things better for >>> users, but also in terms of unblocking the Hadoop development process. >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote= : >>>=20 >>>>> - Next Generation Map-Reduce [MR-279] >>>>> - Passing most tests now and discussing merging into trunk >>>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3941-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 02:54:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 581154AD0 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81393 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 02:54:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80947 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 02:54:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80937 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 02:53:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:53:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:53:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 27820 invoked by uid 507); 25 Jun 2011 02:53:24 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.65361 secs); 25 Jun 2011 02:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2011 02:53:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CE63DC009 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:55:13 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6YCvTfJa48E; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:55:12 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.8.46.25] (unknown [10.8.46.25]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345AA3DC007 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:55:22 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hadoop=B4s_Internationalization?= References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regards to all the list. I´m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of Hadoop, but I don´t know if this is a good project or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it would be very useful for many people that want to see the messages of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. I would like to work on this, but I don´t know how to start on this. I think that a first step is to translate the message of the commands more used by administrators and developers of Hadoop: (The Hadoop fs shell, for example). It would be very useful to have on the source code, a directory for earch language´s messages, but I don´t know if this could carry out many changes on the main API. What do you think about this? Thanls for your time -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3942-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 03:42:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4729743BA for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5514 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 03:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4686 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 03:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4669 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 03:41:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:41:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.32] (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:41:35 +0000 Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 03hB1h0031wfjNsA33hD25; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:41:13 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 03hV1h00d3QAh8g8j3hVSB; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:41:30 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p5P3fD7R014546 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:41:13 -0700 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p5P3fCdY014545 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:41:12 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:41:12 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo Message-ID: <20110625034112.GA14500@linspire.com> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Owen, looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user votes (which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4 equals 37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h Hope it helps Cos On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, > I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the outcome. > > With the binding votes from the PMC: > > > > First Round > 2 4 > 4 4 > 5 6 > 6 1 > Second Round (Drop 6) > 2 5 > 4 4 > 5 6 > Third Round (Drop 4) > 2 8 > 5 7 > > > So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached below, show the counted votes. > > With all of the binding and non-binding votes: > > > > First Round > 1 1 > 2 13 > 4 23 > 5 27 > 6 4 > Second Round(Drop 1) > 2 13 > 4 23 > 5 27 > 6 5 > Third Round (Drop 6) > 2 15 > 4 24 > 5 29 > Forth Round (Drop 2) > 4 35 > 5 31 > > > -- Owen > From general-return-3943-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 05:08:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39816403D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33079 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 05:08:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32562 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 05:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32553 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 05:08:16 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:08:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.65.8.159]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:08:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4E056D3B.9030008@apache.org> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:08:11 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page References: <4E04948B.4050802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/24/2011 07:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> Might it be better to improve the existing Apache trademark policy >> page? > > When the project is having trouble agreeing, reaching agreement at > the foundation level seems unrealistic. ASF trademark policy is set by Shane, VP Trademark, not by a committee. Doug From general-return-3944-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 05:40:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D04A4087 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46282 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 05:40:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45438 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 05:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45226 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 05:39:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:39:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:39:30 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so2086340yxd.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.83.19 with SMTP id g19mr4502700anb.47.1308980349157; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:39:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.141.12 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:38:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:38:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about the next hadoop mainline release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501710ebac01f04a682bc4c --00504501710ebac01f04a682bc4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Thanks Suresh! > > Todd - I'd appreciate if you could help on some of the HBase/Performance > jiras... thanks! > > Sure thing. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00504501710ebac01f04a682bc4c-- From general-return-3945-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 08:38:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 007654D54 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23322 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 08:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22507 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 08:38:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22492 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 08:38:15 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:38:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:38:13 +0000 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so787470qyk.14 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.51.67 with SMTP id c3mr973590qcg.12.1308991092578; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.37.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Hadoop=C2=B4s_Internationalization?= From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636832358165a3504a6853d03 --001636832358165a3504a6853d03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > Regards to all the list. > I=C2=B4m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of = Hadoop, > but I don=C2=B4t know if this is a good project > or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it would b= e > very useful for many people that want to see the messages > of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. I think it would be very useful, but very time consuming project. I'd suggest that you start by translating the documentation for the release int= o another language first. -- Owen --001636832358165a3504a6853d03-- From general-return-3946-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 15:16:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 955FB45E6 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53297 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 15:16:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53174 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 15:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53164 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 15:16:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:16:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:15:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 16391 invoked by uid 507); 25 Jun 2011 15:15:32 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.6502 secs); 25 Jun 2011 15:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2011 15:15:31 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9DD3DC009; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:17:22 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9WRO8UNmBzE; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:17:21 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.7.3.1] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.7.3.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE223DC007; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:17:21 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E05FC0B.2070901@uci.cu> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:17:31 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Owen O'Malley Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?SGFkb29wwrRzIEludGVybmF0aW9uYWxpemF0aW9u?= References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OK, Owen, Where I can find the sources of the docs? Which is the format for the docs? DocBook, ReST, etc? El 6/25/2011 4:38 AM, Owen O'Malley escribió: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > > >> Regards to all the list. >> I´m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of Hadoop, >> but I don´t know if this is a good project >> or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it would be >> very useful for many people that want to see the messages >> of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. >> > > I think it would be very useful, but very time consuming project. I'd > suggest that you start by translating the documentation for the release into > another language first. > > -- Owen > > -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (UCI) http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3947-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 16:09:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EF2346FC for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84322 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 16:09:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84255 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 16:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84247 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 16:09:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:09:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:09:06 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so3187456pve.35 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VWYQJQhuAhhKwSo+v/BkBi/hcEsLDaDo6vyAdNhfXPg=; b=izUM/wDvbnoMRHAQM1NGCKwFhkPO9feZIiRg9ofFmyr6gOLciRdm/uMEqzZgjG7jJA UANevHQMyfKsy57pxoHRHaKYDzYI8eqymbY0z1MIVZE5nDSEGExRcNph33ZNJ+3cRYbR f9ZANOfIHijPJ0mPTjiwlyXuikWQ7kFJEWZnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jBgtU0ml8JjzSxhP2PmC2kt/4kYgMaQIUFTRvZ0Bj1shVUqrUGqxJvVqppepXV1r1h 7xeoXmvSv5i+/UuoIOtkCBaWK/VxwfwSNALt7Mt9OT52dCl0VHfRWf8Bnzh6FbrlWh4c aCJ/pVM47dQWVcZWqMxVNYWt0sdsIOWMV/lwA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.47.39 with SMTP id a7mr2021006pbn.217.1309018126395; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.66.168 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E05FC0B.2070901@uci.cu> References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> <4E05FC0B.2070901@uci.cu> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:08:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Hadoop=B4s_Internationalization?= From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52e66d96daa0304a68b8879 --bcaec52e66d96daa0304a68b8879 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marcos: Which hadoop version(s) do you plan to work on ? >> Where I can find the sources of the docs? In the latest TRUNK, you would find these directories: ./common/src/docs ./hdfs/src/c++/libhdfs/docs ./hdfs/src/docs ./mapreduce/src/docs Cheers On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > OK, Owen, Where I can find the sources of the docs? > Which is the format for the docs? DocBook, ReST, etc? > > El 6/25/2011 4:38 AM, Owen O'Malley escribi=F3: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >> >> >> >>> Regards to all the list. >>> I=B4m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of >>> Hadoop, >>> but I don=B4t know if this is a good project >>> or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it would >>> be >>> very useful for many people that want to see the messages >>> of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. >>> >>> >> >> I think it would be very useful, but very time consuming project. I'd >> suggest that you start by translating the documentation for the release >> into >> another language first. >> >> -- Owen >> >> >> > > -- > Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (UCI) > http://marcosluis2186.**posterous.com > http://twitter.com/**marcosluis2186 > > --bcaec52e66d96daa0304a68b8879-- From general-return-3948-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 07:07:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F7A265DE for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36108 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 07:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34943 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 07:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34923 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 07:06:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:06:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:06:38 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so2419964yxd.35 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.166 with SMTP id n26mr7585848yho.513.1309071976166; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:06:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.35.11 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:05:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> From: Eran Kampf Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:05:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd60afa1ff5a404a69812e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd60afa1ff5a404a69812e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My vote: 5 6 4 2 1 3 - Eran On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them > all on a page, here: > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/ > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them. > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote > will automatically roll over to your next choice. > > -- Owen > > > --000e0cd60afa1ff5a404a69812e1-- From general-return-3949-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 19:11:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D68A6EB1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45860 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 19:11:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45758 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 19:11:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45750 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 19:11:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:11:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.81] (HELO homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:11:40 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242AE2F4059 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:11:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=Q78zWU9H6sFEPh+zey3Ksriaz24GuCJSc4GN9XYXOYWYHrnxX+3n 2LNyYIjNCqhSSV491ih68t1ruflt33dfSK6lf9ssdE73Y3y/01aciJr4lPhMBJip o9yuc82PXJbNiZJONNA3jOusHcV7ewObVJQjJffGIMFtWsUXK7pI7GA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=TeclYzF9l/P4a1mW7N8phQXYZeQ=; b=qNrvjQUPIz12mkSr3QGE29RaxoxY b+Q93PYuhrOBrBIIoXzKH2cUxNdiVia7Nfp8Kvwl3HSr2SPq+0Oq4LTyVeQuw9/j XGdPguMJfL9vW/4DMjRdTZ0e4eChnJAtZTuoETrKyLfNFSUgdeEtDTZhuCAhsc4H gg2+3Pv1rSQV9Ek= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a63.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E988B2F4057 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we adopt the "Defining Hadoop" page From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4E056D3B.9030008@apache.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:11:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16935C45-FE78-418E-9999-EDD1ECC3257D@gbiv.com> References: <4E04948B.4050802@apache.org> <4E056D3B.9030008@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 06/24/2011 07:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >>=20 >>> Might it be better to improve the existing Apache trademark policy >>> page? >>=20 >> When the project is having trouble agreeing, reaching agreement at >> the foundation level seems unrealistic. >=20 > ASF trademark policy is set by Shane, VP Trademark, not by a = committee. If we apply trademark policy to this discussion, then the only answer = possible is that only releases made by the Apache Hadoop PMC can be called = Hadoop. That is, after all, the essence of board delegation to PMCs and the = meaning of trademarks. Traditionally, we have also allowed distributions that apply released security patches, for example as found in=20 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/ and turned a blind eye toward changes that are purely to port to a new = platform. I did not write those exceptions down because I don't know what (if any) = impact they might have on enforcement. I said before that we typically don't argue about distributions that = include revisions that are on a release branch, but that assumed the project is actually working toward a release of that branch. I have a hard time = believing that Hadoop's trunk is a release branch. In any case, this very = specific exception should be entirely decided by the project -- the VP of = Trademarks has no role in deciding what is the purview of each PMC, namely the = decision on what is or is not released in the name of that project. ....Roy From general-return-3950-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 19:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38C2265A0 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55813 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 19:23:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55757 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 19:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55747 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 19:23:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:23:16 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:22:55 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:23:45 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw0NnNxOcpMJme1Sdi1qjHjpJzJZg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4E033676.8030205@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >On 22/06/2011 21:27, Scott Carey wrote: >> "Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed >> Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that >> option is discouraged." >> >> I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What >>JVM >> and OS version was the problem seen? > >A colleague saw it, intermittent JVM crashes. Unless he's updated I >can't say the problem has gone away. > >> >> CompressedOops had several issues prior to Jre 6u20, and a few minor >>ones >> were fixed in u21. FWIW, I now exclusively use 64 bit w/ CompressedOops >> for all Hadoop and non-Hadoop apps and have seen no issues. It is the >> default in 6u24 and 6u25 on a 64 bit JVM. > > >what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? CentOS 5.6. =20 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. Off topic: The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6 core Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs 4 core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU bound tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lower than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more single socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar processor to hard drive ratio). We are power constrained per rack either way. From general-return-3951-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 23:15:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5216967C0 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95155 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 23:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95080 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 23:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95072 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 23:15:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:15:24 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so4935305vxd.35 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:15:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=qa3xAPu5mPIqboULBAeFUns6v6zZcTt+nc9OEEtTm4o=; b=D1n44csPIFBbRvB5A8z47BZfsplmt4A2D/B29w5BglS2tRvsOgBzXWT4R7cw31ZdtW XwBZuTTtPD4zgU9LMaN4Buoxq1gVWiys0oETSHPawBaoqbsehKue1Q1Ilq5SYPt8TxnO nSmvXqjYwdmkJa6sTyltSJ23WZr7PFz+ZOYxE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=QhLcbYQN/+j6RPNuGtNBY+A6rkTG+g05TRc4D0GwhAYjH1D/43uZuj1CoquvvHPOvb 2zouf81R6Q+M0qd7RlGUSEEvVnGr2cjXXPJ75yFfEg8Pt7MjNZMrNDhT6qhoXFFzilMt gQgBretZvPnDrvrOtuoZbf94rwf81oZ5XWTtI= Received: by 10.52.98.39 with SMTP id ef7mr7640515vdb.88.1309130103467; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.74] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ck16sm1370968vdb.44.2011.06.26.16.15.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <20110625034112.GA14500@linspire.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:14:57 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <20110625034112.GA14500@linspire.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Is there a reason we can't have 2 powered by logo's that vendors etc can = choose from? On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Owen, >=20 > looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user = votes > (which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4 = equals > 37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h >=20 > Hope it helps > Cos >=20 > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Ok, >> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that = method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it = changed the outcome. >>=20 >> With the binding votes from the PMC: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> First Round=09 >> 2 4 >> 4 4 >> 5 6 >> 6 1 >> Second Round (Drop 6) >> 2 5 >> 4 4 >> 5 6 >> Third Round (Drop 4) >> 2 8 >> 5 7 >>=20 >>=20 >> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are = attached below, show the counted votes. >>=20 >> With all of the binding and non-binding votes: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> First Round=09 >> 1 1 >> 2 13 >> 4 23 >> 5 27 >> 6 4 >> Second Round(Drop 1) >> 2 13 >> 4 23 >> 5 27 >> 6 5 >> Third Round (Drop 6) >> 2 15 >> 4 24 >> 5 29 >> Forth Round (Drop 2) >> 4 35 >> 5 31 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- Owen >>=20 From general-return-3952-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 23:24:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C2046CED for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3833 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 23:24:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3712 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 23:24:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3704 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 23:24:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:24:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:24:13 +0000 Received: by vxd2 with SMTP id 2so4938818vxd.35 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.175.133 with SMTP id ca5mr7740478vdc.82.1309130632055; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:23:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.109.8 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:23:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <20110625034112.GA14500@linspire.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:23:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5014c6b49cb4004a6a5ba52 --bcaec5014c6b49cb4004a6a5ba52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would propose that the core be specified with some look and feel flexibility. Logo 2, for instance, is basically the same logo as log 4 except for font changes and the circle. If we consider the circle to be totally optional and intended just to make the logo fit in with the rest of the site, then the basic idea of *that* yellow elephant with *those* words can be the definition. How does that sound? I am happy to have an artist produce some variants on logo 2 that have a) larger font b) various sizes Would that be useful? On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Is there a reason we can't have 2 powered by logo's that vendors etc can > choose from? > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > Owen, > > > > looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user > votes > > (which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4 > equals > > 37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h > > > > Hope it helps > > Cos > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Ok, > >> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method > missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the > outcome. > >> > >> With the binding votes from the PMC: > >> > >> > >> > >> First Round > >> 2 4 > >> 4 4 > >> 5 6 > >> 6 1 > >> Second Round (Drop 6) > >> 2 5 > >> 4 4 > >> 5 6 > >> Third Round (Drop 4) > >> 2 8 > >> 5 7 > >> > >> > >> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached > below, show the counted votes. > >> > >> With all of the binding and non-binding votes: > >> > >> > >> > >> First Round > >> 1 1 > >> 2 13 > >> 4 23 > >> 5 27 > >> 6 4 > >> Second Round(Drop 1) > >> 2 13 > >> 4 23 > >> 5 27 > >> 6 5 > >> Third Round (Drop 6) > >> 2 15 > >> 4 24 > >> 5 29 > >> Forth Round (Drop 2) > >> 4 35 > >> 5 31 > >> > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > > --bcaec5014c6b49cb4004a6a5ba52-- From general-return-3953-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 11:31:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E6BF406E for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79488 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 11:31:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79372 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 11:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79363 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 11:31:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:31:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:31:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15582B7E87 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:31:02 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GhyLr+P-slqR for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:31:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB7DB7E82 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:31:01 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309779048.01447@zXb4FLMRFxkHGAkm55Fx7g Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5RBUkcw029373 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:30:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E0869E6.1000505@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:30:46 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo References: <8F5720E1-00D0-4352-B9D4-76C51C48F184@apache.org> <420C1431-457C-4D2E-B3DB-618C9B69D8CC@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <420C1431-457C-4D2E-B3DB-618C9B69D8CC@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5RBUkcw029373 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 24/06/11 17:54, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices >> modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is >> accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC >> did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point. > > Clearly the PMC is full of circle-phobes. > it's why I work in a cube From general-return-3954-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 11:39:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5990B40B9 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93750 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 11:39:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93684 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 11:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93676 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 11:39:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:39:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:39:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C163BB7EE1 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:39:03 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Rh2bhkh+FE+S for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:39:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2CFB7ECA for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:39:02 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309779528.15627@kiBsdPPPAEWJuKctw/bh/A Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5RBclCU029793 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:38:47 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:38:47 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5RBclCU029793 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: > > > On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > >> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? > > CentOS 5.6. > 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core 12 thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which shows that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the more your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have 10-1000 servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race condition showing up scales well. > Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. > > Off topic: > The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use > cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6 core > Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs 4 > core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU bound > tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lower > than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more single > socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar processor > to hard drive ratio). Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can compare to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it depends on your application. Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that 10 Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with good locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at 1Gbps/server, though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of replication traffic when a single server fails... From general-return-3955-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:11:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E2B240CD for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81875 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:11:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81812 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81804 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:11:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.51] (HELO mail-fx0-f51.google.com) (209.85.161.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:11:05 +0000 Received: by fxh10 with SMTP id 10so2460176fxh.38 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GvJjmTJVAZw74GyHNXhyZ+QT+e5kAT0nNQfajKmRThM=; b=QMEHXa/s6IeCr8EHiDqGkzvkH78mkCFj8Y/NiMS/2Zmu4i7XUfLYu6oGvRaaAv4jPe Re6q5FwyHsM7HPM+OwbpeE4YgcJxUcTTfQkN6YG0oPaFVNgZwxI1rsHCTRiGn58BpHI+ mYPN87EF0XMB0ipN0XSIFjQ6RfVZqd+AmvEs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MnufmwaWIDdeyugGg5Z8KUniJF28+vfGiLf6HJqoOBx4cW9SkgAmCb+IQOTqGWR12q 1ssupgoidfPJgkyUrczp7H1q6VEDyUgtJIORkBN3it/XZlrYFO6ym548OYzGAQ3bIAtM SsRmwXia0YDBubni3O65dPluBvY+Hj2lIkH9E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.100.197 with SMTP id z5mr5308979fan.46.1309219844537; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.81.78 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:10:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard drive of streaming data. Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the network. On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can choke a cluster to death. The only way to fix quickly it is to bring that node back up. Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. -ryan On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: >> >> >> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" =A0wrote: >> > >>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? >> >> CentOS 5.6. >> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). > > > that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core 12 > thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which sho= ws > that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the more > your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have 10-1= 000 > servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race condit= ion > showing up scales well. > >> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. >> >> Off topic: >> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use >> cases -- and much lower power. =A0Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6 = core >> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs 4 >> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU bou= nd >> tasks and lower power. =A0Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lower >> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more sing= le >> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar processo= r >> to hard drive ratio). > > Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can compar= e > to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it depen= ds > on your application. > > Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that 10 > Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with good > locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at 1Gbps/serv= er, > though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of replicat= ion > traffic when a single server fails... > From general-return-3956-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7C2A4106 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83757 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83689 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83681 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:12:59 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so6097499vws.35 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.176.74 with SMTP id cg10mr9498775vdc.242.1309219958095; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:12:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.109.8 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:12:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f34c28900e904a6ba863d --20cf307f34c28900e904a6ba863d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Come to Srivas talk at the Summit. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly > be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard > drive of streaming data. Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the > network. On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can > choke a cluster to death. The only way to fix quickly it is to bring > that node back up. Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. > > -ryan > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > >> > > > >>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? > >> > >> CentOS 5.6. > >> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). > > > > > > that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core 12 > > thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which > shows > > that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the more > > your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have > 10-1000 > > servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race > condition > > showing up scales well. > > > >> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. > >> > >> Off topic: > >> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use > >> cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6 > core > >> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs 4 > >> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU > bound > >> tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lower > >> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more > single > >> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar > processor > >> to hard drive ratio). > > > > Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can > compare > > to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it > depends > > on your application. > > > > Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that 10 > > Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with good > > locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at > 1Gbps/server, > > though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of > replication > > traffic when a single server fails... > > > --20cf307f34c28900e904a6ba863d-- From general-return-3957-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 01:53:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 426414F6F for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61014 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 01:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60950 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 01:53:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60942 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 01:53:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:53:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:53:48 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5S1rREo002124 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:53:27 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 8CBEA3EED8DB for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:53:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id uVEuJup1nwnFcXaE for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:53:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p5S1rRNe006096; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:53:27 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:53:26 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:54:13 -0500 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1NitudJPPhQAbQm6NvvTRwMCcPA== Message-ID: <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 That doesn't seem right. In one of our test clusters (19 data nodes) we found that under heavy loa= ds we were disk I/O bound and not network bound. Of course YMMV depending= on your ToR switch. If we had more than 4 disks per node, we would proba= bly see the network being the bottleneck. What did you set your bandwidth= settings in the hdfs-site.xml? ( going from memory not sure of the exact= setting...) But the good news... Newer hardware will start to have 10GBe on the mothe= rboard. Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:11 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: > On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly > be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard > drive of streaming data. Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the > network. On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can > choke a cluster to death. The only way to fix quickly it is to bring > that node back up. Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. >=20 > -ryan >=20 > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran wro= te: >> On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >>>=20 >>=20 >>>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? >>>=20 >>> CentOS 5.6. >>> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). >>=20 >>=20 >> that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core= 12 >> thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which = shows >> that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the m= ore >> your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have 1= 0-1000 >> servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race con= dition >> showing up scales well. >>=20 >>> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. >>>=20 >>> Off topic: >>> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use >>> cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6= core >>> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core v= s 4 >>> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU = bound >>> tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lowe= r >>> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more s= ingle >>> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar proce= ssor >>> to hard drive ratio). >>=20 >> Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can com= pare >> to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it de= pends >> on your application. >>=20 >> Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that = 10 >> Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with goo= d >> locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at 1Gbps/s= erver, >> though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of repli= cation >> traffic when a single server fails... >>=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3958-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 02:34:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0DB76D2F for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98493 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 02:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98043 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 02:34:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98023 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 02:33:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:33:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.51] (HELO mail-fx0-f51.google.com) (209.85.161.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:33:50 +0000 Received: by fxh10 with SMTP id 10so2546409fxh.38 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:33:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tN1DknEwVkHHcplke29kfpZdsFZDCeA5TR2TifIidUg=; b=vm+qFLaBXBpDxKTDKDPOVuHcm2MVSVsCjaw/qIEhaag/HHm/jZDkNwHeI/zYb3slKw XzS82PR//VKfPDmFFfey6P1CgxkemwghZeTJTM1FHA56cgSvOaDFQOhLy8i5RtMV9qTJ afRY8WITeCR2sCtoMOGahBwGHgzCS7ANpnRuw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ITrebfKElufB4aWIGOwMr/KZLCkdglCB4rXZG+MaYMlD3f0GfZfsspwBc518Gs3dUO CTKBvoKvXZv1TCs93wDfPLLJHQBs3vz8kFMSo3y8p47BF9bUDx4UUdQ1i0drYWAVtpZI u1KNv3K3n8K+zdxzuo9qWQgs+ryw/7g21Eva0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.59.92 with SMTP id k28mr9860758fah.27.1309228408894; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.81.78 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:33:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:33:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are no bandwidth limitations in 0.20.x. None that I saw at least. It was basically bandwidth-management-by-pwm. You could adjust the frequency of how many files-per-node were copied. In my case, the load was HBase real time serving, so it was servicing more smaller random reads, not a map-reduce. Everyone has their own use case :-) -ryan On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > That doesn't seem right. > In one of our test clusters (19 data nodes) we found that under heavy loa= ds we were disk I/O bound and not network bound. Of course YMMV depending o= n your ToR switch. If we had more than 4 disks per node, we would probably = see the network being the bottleneck. What did you set your bandwidth setti= ngs in the hdfs-site.xml? ( going from memory not sure of the exact setting= ...) > > But the good news... Newer hardware will start to have 10GBe on the mothe= rboard. > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:11 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: > >> On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly >> be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard >> drive of streaming data. =A0Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the >> network. =A0On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can >> choke a cluster to death. =A0The only way to fix quickly it is to bring >> that node back up. =A0Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. >> >> -ryan >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran wrot= e: >>> On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" =A0wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? >>>> >>>> CentOS 5.6. >>>> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). >>> >>> >>> that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core = 12 >>> thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which s= hows >>> that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the mo= re >>> your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have 10= -1000 >>> servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race cond= ition >>> showing up scales well. >>> >>>> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. >>>> >>>> Off topic: >>>> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use >>>> cases -- and much lower power. =A0Looking forward to single proc 4 or = 6 core >>>> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs= 4 >>>> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU b= ound >>>> tasks and lower power. =A0Intel prices single socket Xeons so much low= er >>>> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more si= ngle >>>> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar proces= sor >>>> to hard drive ratio). >>> >>> Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can comp= are >>> to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it dep= ends >>> on your application. >>> >>> Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that 1= 0 >>> Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with good >>> locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at 1Gbps/se= rver, >>> though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of replic= ation >>> traffic when a single server fails... >>> > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. =A0If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is= strictly prohibited. =A0If you have received this communication in error, = please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any co= py of it from your computer or paper files. > From general-return-3959-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 02:58:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4782678B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14127 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 02:58:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13911 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 02:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13892 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 02:58:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:58:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:58:12 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:57:51 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:58:43 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1PysZESKZW5H9Toauz1SW5fWmsA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 For cost reasons, we just bonded two 1G network ports together. A single stream won't go past 1Gbps, but concurrent ones do -- this is with the Linux built-in bonding. The network is only stressed during 'sort-like' jobs or big replication events. We also removed some disk bottlenecks by tuning the file systems aggressively -- using a separate partition for the M/R temp and the location that jars may unpack into helps tremendously. Ext4 can be configured to delay flushing to disk for this temp space, which for small jobs decreases the I/O tremendously as many files are deleted before they get pushed to disk. On 6/27/11 5:10 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: >On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly >be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard >drive of streaming data. Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the >network. On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can >choke a cluster to death. The only way to fix quickly it is to bring >that node back up. Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. > >-ryan > >On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >>> >> >>>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? >>> >>> CentOS 5.6. >>> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). >> >> >> that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-core >>12 >> thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, which >>shows >> that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the >>more >> your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have >>10-1000 >> servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race >>condition >> showing up scales well. >> >>> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeons. >>> >>> Off topic: >>> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most use >>> cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or 6 >>>core >>> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core vs >>>4 >>> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CPU >>>bound >>> tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lower >>> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more >>>single >>> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar >>>processor >>> to hard drive ratio). >> >> Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can >>compare >> to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it >>depends >> on your application. >> >> Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry that 10 >> Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with good >> locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at >>1Gbps/server, >> though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of >>replication >> traffic when a single server fails... >> From general-return-3960-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 03:49:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8F836771 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50509 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 03:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50329 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 03:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50321 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 03:49:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:49:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:49:06 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5S3Chi0011185 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:12:43 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 90682488FF25 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:48:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id pi7z0jqipuIoDXVe for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:48:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5S3mhPP011138 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:48:44 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:48:43 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:49:31 -0500 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1RkZxBLZ+20d6SSimJ/e80DXtjw== Message-ID: <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hmmm. I could have sworn there was a background balancing bandwidth limit= er. Haven't tested random reads... The last test we did ended up hitting the = cache, but we didn't push it hard enough to hit network bandwidth limitat= ions... Not to say they don't exist. Like I said in the other post, if we= had more disks... we would hit it.=20 We'll have to do more random testing. Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:34 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: > There are no bandwidth limitations in 0.20.x. None that I saw at > least. It was basically bandwidth-management-by-pwm. You could > adjust the frequency of how many files-per-node were copied. >=20 > In my case, the load was HBase real time serving, so it was servicing > more smaller random reads, not a map-reduce. Everyone has their own > use case :-) >=20 > -ryan >=20 > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: >> That doesn't seem right. >> In one of our test clusters (19 data nodes) we found that under heavy = loads we were disk I/O bound and not network bound. Of course YMMV depend= ing on your ToR switch. If we had more than 4 disks per node, we would pr= obably see the network being the bottleneck. What did you set your bandwi= dth settings in the hdfs-site.xml? ( going from memory not sure of the ex= act setting...) >>=20 >> But the good news... Newer hardware will start to have 10GBe on the mo= therboard. >>=20 >> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>=20 >> Mike Segel >>=20 >> On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:11 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: >>=20 >>> On the subject of gige vs 10-gige, I think that we will very shortly >>> be seeing interest in 10gig, since gige is only 120MB/sec - 1 hard >>> drive of streaming data. Nodes with 4+ disks are throttled by the >>> network. On a small cluster (20 nodes), the replication traffic can >>> choke a cluster to death. The only way to fix quickly it is to bring >>> that node back up. Perhaps the HortonWorks guys can work on that. >>>=20 >>> -ryan >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Steve Loughran w= rote: >>>> On 26/06/11 20:23, Scott Carey wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 6/23/11 5:49 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>>> what's your HW setup? #cores/server, #servers, underlying OS? >>>>>=20 >>>>> CentOS 5.6. >>>>> 4 cores / 8 threads a server (Nehalem generation Intel processor). >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> that should be enough to find problems. I've just moved up to a 6-co= re 12 >>>> thread desktop and that found problems on some non-Hadoop code, whic= h shows >>>> that the more threads you have, and the faster the machines are, the= more >>>> your race conditions show up. With Hadoop the fact that you can have= 10-1000 >>>> servers means that in a large cluster the probability of that race c= ondition >>>> showing up scales well. >>>>=20 >>>>> Also run a smaller cluster with 2x quad core Core 2 generation Xeon= s. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Off topic: >>>>> The single proc Nehalem is faster than the dual core 2's for most u= se >>>>> cases -- and much lower power. Looking forward to single proc 4 or= 6 core >>>>> Sandy Bridge based systems for the next expansion -- testing 4 core= vs 4 >>>>> core has these 30% faster than the Nehalem generation systems in CP= U bound >>>>> tasks and lower power. Intel prices single socket Xeons so much lo= wer >>>>> than the Dual socket ones that the best value for us is to get more= single >>>>> socket servers rather than fewer dual socket ones (with similar pro= cessor >>>>> to hard drive ratio). >>>>=20 >>>> Yes, in a large cluster the price of filling the second socket can c= ompare >>>> to a lot of storage, and TB of storage is more tangible. I guess it = depends >>>> on your application. >>>>=20 >>>> Regarding Sandy Bridge, I've no experience of those, but I worry tha= t 10 >>>> Gbps is still bleeding edge, and shouldn't be needed for code with g= ood >>>> locality anyway; it is probably more cost effective to stay at 1Gbps= /server, >>>> though the issue there is the #of HDD/s server generates lots of rep= lication >>>> traffic when a single server fails... >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL an= d is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you a= re not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemina= tion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conte= nts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in = error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message a= nd any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >>=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3961-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 10:00:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 923BB6C5B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23005 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 10:00:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22244 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 10:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22230 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 10:00:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:00:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:00:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179361BA2E9 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:59:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a6bhNdoI-0ir for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:59:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F7F1BA0FB for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:59:57 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1309859983.49478@+UAzzVM+FNcKlRvcHfdRDQ Received: from [16.25.175.86] (wildhaus.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.86]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p5S9xhh5002415 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:59:43 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:59:40 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> In-Reply-To: <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5S9xhh5002415 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 28/06/11 04:49, Segel, Mike wrote: > Hmmm. I could have sworn there was a background balancing bandwidth limiter. There is, for the rebalancer, node outages are taken more seriously, though there have been problems in past 0.20.x where there was a risk of a cascade failure on a big switch/rack failure. The risk has been reduced, though we all await field reports to confirm this :) You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. But -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with Cisco -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports useful) -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a re-replication of every block in the rack. 2x1 Gbe lets you have redundant switches, albeit at the price of more wiring, more things to go wrong with the wiring, etc. The other thing to consider is how well the "enterprise" switches work in this world -with a Hadoop cluster you can really test those claims how well the switches handle every port lighting up at full rate. Indeed, I recommend that as part of your acceptance tests for the switch. From general-return-3962-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 12:27:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 678C064E2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32379 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 12:26:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32295 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 12:26:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32278 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 12:26:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:26:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,LOTS_OF_MONEY,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of im_gumby@hotmail.com designates 65.55.116.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.116.29] (HELO blu0-omc1-s18.blu0.hotmail.com) (65.55.116.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:26:47 +0000 Received: from BLU0-SMTP155 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:26 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.37] X-Originating-Email: [im_gumby@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([173.15.87.37]) by BLU0-SMTP155.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:26 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> From: Michel Segel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8J2) In-Reply-To: <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:27:13 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8J2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2011 12:26:26.0771 (UTC) FILETIME=[99BB2A30:01CC358E] Sender: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You're preaching to the choir. :-) With Sandybridge, you're going to start seeing 10 GBe on the motherboard. We built our clusters using 1U boxes where you're stuck w 4 3.5" drives. Wit= h larger chassis, You can fit an additional controller card and more drives. More drives reduces the bottleneck and means your performance will be thro= ttled by your network and the amount of memory. I priced out a couple of vendors and when you build out your boxes, the magi= c number per data node is $10,000.00 USD. (budget this amount per data node.= ) Moore's Law doesn't drop the price, but it gets you more bang for your buc= k. Note that this magic number is pre-discount and YMMV. [This also gets in t= o what is meant by commodity hardware.] I agree that 10GBe is a necessity and I have been looking at it for the past= 2 years, only to be shot down by my client's IT group. I agree that Cisco's= ToR switches are expensive, however there are Arista and Blade networks swi= tches that claim to be Cisco friendly and aren't too pricey. Somewhere aroun= d 10K a box. (Again YMMV). If you want to upgrade existing boxes, you will probably want to look at Sol= arflare cards.=20 jMHO... Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 28/06/11 04:49, Segel, Mike wrote: >> Hmmm. I could have sworn there was a background balancing bandwidth limit= er. >=20 > There is, for the rebalancer, node outages are taken more seriously, thoug= h there have been problems in past 0.20.x where there was a risk of a cascad= e failure on a big switch/rack failure. The risk has been reduced, though we= all await field reports to confirm this :) >=20 > You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server g= enerates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. >=20 > But > -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with Cisc= o > -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out managem= ent on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS wasn't expecti= ng and off the mainboard. This should improve. > -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports use= ful) > -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a re-rep= lication of every block in the rack. >=20 > 2x1 Gbe lets you have redundant switches, albeit at the price of more wiri= ng, more things to go wrong with the wiring, etc. >=20 > The other thing to consider is how well the "enterprise" switches work in t= his world -with a Hadoop cluster you can really test those claims how well t= he switches handle every port lighting up at full rate. Indeed, I recommend t= hat as part of your acceptance tests for the switch. >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3963-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:26:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB2696C5D for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31699 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31634 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:26:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31626 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:26:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:26:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of arunc@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5SHPAV3092265; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:25:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1309281910; bh=1fynlfPBgRaGCoZhzcRIhlkd9H05BQARSuBxR14W57Y=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=idKsLZQ8piqj/BXvs4BMcEKws5hUec2nxi/nxk8TeDRku16yIEysXDCqTbcJjBq7D lLkbjIGgu08fS/PmxH4MjLlzOqlW8/Y4DbkfSuwtgrPokzD7MOqpo5pMUnRwXCdzXW Foz+2v6BqET/BAbe/tW8whVAK6LiWLCfT8JknSuI= Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:25:10 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:25:05 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1uFVaG7l7VCOvTwyMrfWlJCgZTA== Message-ID: References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We at Yahoo are about to deploy code to ensure a disk failure on a datanode= is just that - a disk failure. Not a node failure. This really helps avoid= replication storms. It's in the 0.20.204 branch for the curious. Arun Sent from my iPhone On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:01 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > On 28/06/11 04:49, Segel, Mike wrote: >> Hmmm. I could have sworn there was a background balancing bandwidth limi= ter. >=20 > There is, for the rebalancer, node outages are taken more seriously,=20 > though there have been problems in past 0.20.x where there was a risk of= =20 > a cascade failure on a big switch/rack failure. The risk has been=20 > reduced, though we all await field reports to confirm this :) >=20 > You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server= =20 > generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. >=20 > But > -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with=20 > Cisco > -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out=20 > management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS=20 > wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. > -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports=20 > useful) > -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a=20 > re-replication of every block in the rack. >=20 > 2x1 Gbe lets you have redundant switches, albeit at the price of more=20 > wiring, more things to go wrong with the wiring, etc. >=20 > The other thing to consider is how well the "enterprise" switches work=20 > in this world -with a Hadoop cluster you can really test those claims=20 > how well the switches handle every port lighting up at full rate.=20 > Indeed, I recommend that as part of your acceptance tests for the switch. >=20 >=20 From general-return-3964-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:13:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE8D96B35 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61301 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:12:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60909 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60900 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:12:40 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1114315gxk.35 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.165.19 with SMTP id s19mr1475711ano.53.1309417939721; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:12:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.164.19 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:11:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:11:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hoping to merge HDFS-1073 branch soon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92a8d28dd5004a6e89fa4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c92a8d28dd5004a6e89fa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, Work on the HDFS-1073 branch has been progressing steadily, and I believe we're coming close to the point where it can be merged. To briefly summarize the status: - NameNode and SecondaryNameNode are both fully working and have undergone some stress/fault testing in addition to a over 3000 lines worth of new unit tests. - Most of the existing unit tests have been updated, though a few more need some small tweaks (HDFS-2101) - The BackupNode and CheckpointNode are not currently working, though I am working on it locally and making good progress (HDFS-1979) - There are a few various and sundry small improvements that should probably be done before release, but I think could be done either before or after merge (eg HDFS-2104) Given this, I am expecting that we can merge this into trunk by the end of July if not earlier, as soon as the BN/CN work is complete. If you are hoping to review the code or tests before merge time, this is your early warning! Please do so now! Thanks! -Todd P.S. I will also be giving a short talk about the motivations and current status of this project at Friday's contributor meeting, for those who are able to attend. If we're lucky, maybe even a demo! -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636c92a8d28dd5004a6e89fa4-- From general-return-3965-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 16:07:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C4616EC7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 137 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 16:07:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99810 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 16:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99801 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 16:06:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:06:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 69.147.107.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of eric14@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:06:54 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c110.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.110]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p5UG69FN070513 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:06:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1309449971; bh=uDOCAQxshJsKghnWqPo+spYzI9RwgY+PbSViIWCoV2c=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=Pb4SaqXxuytEXiCS9D1+JV1a0Mw37zx8kQXJZ9FZ7qNdIe0u+HfUaUpzpm0Iw2Cv0 xHEPee5l8yINpJMcbTEC9eykASiheRcioq10rkcUpXJAg/VThwz4Xx8qq46mKk2s3D Zph9zWQ5wCDHZBkVBLKY86cSY8tHPzAVvN++HNV8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Hadoop=B4s_Internationalization?= From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:06:08 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <67CCDC04-7B42-4B1F-96A5-DD617B3905CF@yahoo-inc.com> References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Do other apache projects have a good localization framework for error = messages? =20 I'd think there would be interest in starting this, although since we'd = need to add the framework, this would be an investment. On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >=20 >> Regards to all the list. >> I=B4m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of = Hadoop, >> but I don=B4t know if this is a good project >> or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it = would be >> very useful for many people that want to see the messages >> of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. >=20 >=20 > I think it would be very useful, but very time consuming project. I'd > suggest that you start by translating the documentation for the = release into > another language first. >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-3966-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 21:27:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D69966AD6 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53749 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:27:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53324 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53064 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 21:27:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:27:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:27:42 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so3211249pve.35 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tgBPB98Men4x7xF5o9+C2lIPZ1753BjGXH/XBzAdvBU=; b=QgKGdoloVH8fS6m5SKk82AAhJH7p1Dj5dxPQMAFScC4LTFxdLWTM4NJizpfkpcE3bg xZT38ExkRH1Aa1cIwIw4PrmQONpZeydwy3THornIpd00B8/vsG7vf9gDykWqTw23U6Or Fq7hqosMdKDeCjTSqW8LAlHMq5LnIRSsNm838= Received: by 10.142.207.2 with SMTP id e2mr1198916wfg.415.1309469241216; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.92.11 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:26:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <67CCDC04-7B42-4B1F-96A5-DD617B3905CF@yahoo-inc.com> References: <41D837D5-97C3-48BB-9F95-01720DFB769C@yahoo-inc.com> <4E054E1A.2090809@uci.cu> <67CCDC04-7B42-4B1F-96A5-DD617B3905CF@yahoo-inc.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:26:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Hadoop=B4s_Internationalization?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd be hesitant about this given our experience with the Chinese version of the Hadoop documents. Picking the Chinese version of hdfs_quota_admin_guide.xml, as an example, shows that it has not actually been updated (beyond svn moves and copyright years) since its original commit back on 12/10/08 (svn rev: 736174). I'm actually going to open a JIRA to remove it since it's now woefully out of data (and even worse than no documentation is wrong documentation). We'd need to make sure that there would be contributors willing and able to keep these documents up-to-date, which hasn't happened with the Chinese, even though we have quite a few Chinese-speaking contributors. -jakob On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Do other apache projects have a good localization framework for error mes= sages? > > I'd think there would be interest in starting this, although since we'd n= eed to add the framework, this would be an investment. > > On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >> >>> Regards to all the list. >>> I=B4m looking for a proper way to work on the internationalization of H= adoop, >>> but I don=B4t know if this is a good project >>> or if this is useful for the community, at least, I think that it would= be >>> very useful for many people that want to see the messages >>> of the project in another language, for example, in Spanish. >> >> >> I think it would be very useful, but very time consuming project. I'd >> suggest that you start by translating the documentation for the release = into >> another language first. >> >> -- Owen > > From general-return-3967-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 21:36:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23FA3643F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72754 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72695 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72685 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 21:36:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:36:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:36:18 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:35:55 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:35:51 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:31:26 +0200 Subject: RE: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1ekRqZgpWnTB4T6m5N4iD7AhplgB8sz+f Message-ID: References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com>,<4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server > generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. >=20 > But > -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with > Cisco > -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out > management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS > wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. > -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports > useful) > -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a > re-replication of every block in the rack. Keeping the amount of disks per node low and the amount of nodes high shoul= d keep the impact of dead nodes in control. A ToR switch failing is differe= nt - missing 30 nodes (~120TB) at once cannot be fixed by adding more nodes= ; that actually increases ToR switch failure. Although such failure is quit= e rare to begin with, I guess. The back-of-the-envelope-calculation I made = suggests that ~150 (1U) nodes should be fine with 1Gb ethernet. (e.g., when= 6 nodes fail in a cluster with 150 nodes with four 2TB disks each, with HD= FS 60% full, it takes around ~32 minutes to recover. 2 nodes failing should= take around 640 seconds. Also see the attached spreadsheet.) This doesn't = take ToR switch failure in account though. On the other hand - 150 nodes is= only ~5 racks - in such a scenario you might rather want to shut the syste= m down completely rather than letting it replicate 20% of all data. Cheers, Evert= From general-return-3968-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 21:39:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0410265A4 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77084 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:39:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76999 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76990 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 21:39:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:39:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:39:16 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:38:53 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:38:32 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:37:11 +0200 Subject: RE: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw1ekRqZgpWnTB4T6m5N4iD7AhplgB8sz+fAAAzYYM= Message-ID: References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com>,<4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA97planckkasaran_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA97planckkasaran_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Forgot to attach the spreadsheet - here it is. All three tabs contain some = data. The speeds are per second. Evert ________________________________________ From: Evert Lammerts [Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:31 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop Java Versions > You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server > generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. > > But > -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with > Cisco > -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out > management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS > wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. > -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports > useful) > -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a > re-replication of every block in the rack. Keeping the amount of disks per node low and the amount of nodes high shoul= d keep the impact of dead nodes in control. A ToR switch failing is differe= nt - missing 30 nodes (~120TB) at once cannot be fixed by adding more nodes= ; that actually increases ToR switch failure. Although such failure is quit= e rare to begin with, I guess. The back-of-the-envelope-calculation I made = suggests that ~150 (1U) nodes should be fine with 1Gb ethernet. (e.g., when= 6 nodes fail in a cluster with 150 nodes with four 2TB disks each, with HD= FS 60% full, it takes around ~32 minutes to recover. 2 nodes failing should= take around 640 seconds. Also see the attached spreadsheet.) This doesn't = take ToR switch failure in account though. On the other hand - 150 nodes is= only ~5 racks - in such a scenario you might rather want to shut the syste= m down completely rather than letting it replicate 20% of all data. Cheers, Evert --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA97planckkasaran_ Content-Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet; name="recovery_speed.ods" Content-Description: recovery_speed.ods Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="recovery_speed.ods"; size=86421; creation-date="Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:37:45 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:37:45 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 UEsDBBQAAAgAADar3j6FbDmKLgAAAC4AAAAIAAAAbWltZXR5cGVhcHBsaWNhdGlvbi92bmQub2Fz aXMub3BlbmRvY3VtZW50LnNwcmVhZHNoZWV0UEsDBBQACAgIADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALAAAA Y29udGVudC54bWzs3e2PW0eW5/n3+1cIWmBRPYBCceLhRIS3XIMmi9VvqjGz1duLBQaDRVpK2dmt J2SmyuX56/eS8bsnT9y2y44uyy5eHMlm6OZJiZkkv8mnDy9/+1//8u7tsz/f3j/cfXj/5XNy/vmz 2/evPry+e//1l8//9f/+w4v6/L/+7n/77Yc3b+5e3X7x+sOrT+9u3z++ePXh/eOyPlv+9vuHL/r0 y+ef7t9/8eHm4e7hi/c3724fvnh89cWHj7fv17/1hf7sLy7H1T/y8Pjd25/81y+frP/24+1fHn/q Xz5/7vB3b7766cd8+WT9t1/f33z7U//y+XOXE1X/9Tcffupf/svD2xdvPiyn+ruPN493m6/iL2/v 3v/7l8+/eXz8+MXLl99++637NroP91+/pNbay8tUvuBX8nkfP92/vXzW61cvb9/eno/s4SU5erl+ 7rvbx5uf+vWdP1d/Se8/vfvq9v4nnzQ3jzf/4Vz9eH/7sHzK8u2eL5g/7R/Sf2e4fP3565986frz 1z9wMr/65ub+J1/OLp88XlTi659+UYmv9d99d/P4zQ+cv/XlPy/Dy8E///HpcnX/7qce1/lzh5Pq 1f3dx5/8bfbP1n//w4cP8qWe/0KP/fLlBu/Ty76tPvvbv/rp397fPd7eq09/9Vc//dXN21dyin94 930n2vJ59HL5jBe3fz5f5CWi8wnx8AN/IbzsY/nkh9c/+E//v//8x3959c3tu5unT7778U9+cff+ 4fHm/dMpc38+E37wO80v728/frh/lBPmzU//4bucW0G+tm8e37394R8d5+n6qV/fv379vZ+6fDnx 5fJjZIn4xZ/vbr/934efrX/98tBeXj5JLrh3t2/XSuRz8e3c/uXj7f3d+Tu5eXu+ILx497CcaMuF 48PHL9TfHn++3r/7y0/7584XiA+v32z/RYkDf1ddUS6n4eUk+eLx/ub9w/kz8aMK3+xyuj+4y/nx 4nzkl++4/yvLT9nlAvXw9vHlcozh/vUbt2w8/916HdubengpH3izXNe+eHPz6vbF69tXbx9+99v+ s1I+/Kxvn7+vL5//8W75wXv5Sp79y/J1PX+2/EBbP/Xd3dvvvnz+f9x8/PDwf24+r3/w+bPhnz5/ /ouvb98vJ9SS3cO3dw8Pw2d8vHt8tfxg+vPN/d3lXHz517+039/+283/8+mvf1nqc37Kl/Tdw+Pt ux/7ml7+0OmIj998evxwPvNevbj8O3ICXw6H7+DVB5Ijw5d9ufwu1xhvP717/3z9m/qDLz4ul6fb +8e724dnbz588dX97c2/v/jqdrnALP/g+ajXfxGf/u3d6/NP++Uy0lK+e3/5BtTX89e+uPDLfXGJ As99cfEXPOVqnDzl0i/3xVErYe6Ly7/gF5dimfvi+Jf64ryrLUyereUXvMwlP3m21l/wbI1h6my9 /6Gfc/cfvt18ZctH9JfVR+cPfnN79/U3j+fzjUpdjvyvf8WfHm6Xq8nHu3c3b1/ov/14/+n2p3/d jzff/3WvH3y33M24vX/x8ebr2xfrddKbm09vHzfflPqG+n2+13cPH9/efIevB//a+bbpco/uxbsP r5d/6e39i8evfvqX+vX9f/hSv76/+fjN3Sv5WrCtv5rzncgvPixf4fkPL24ePt6+Wk4kmjmF/r/l HvD97ZvvP51+6snw5ubtw/ecLy9/8BoVg68+vP7u6YbOcnft5vXDN7e3j7/7bT+CyyGOrH/B/3Ie LydV/9jln3uhzuz+4Y/3y+229asa/i2U8z1//XJdjm+rXwhevLp9+/aF/pz10vHyJ/+b4TP8m/Ez /JvpSr7O/Bn+zc9xvvN/9t9cfth9zz94/gG8Oe7l35N7ITdvP92+ePzu4/KZD4/LZf/r8yefH9n6 +LvT4ze39+9vH58tPxtuXz/7zekffvsSo9++3P6D/7mj+Md3Hz69f1w+89n75Sffw7Pf/OPPfxzH m483r+4ev3u2XDEs38W//vzH8Pu7h39/9mo9mt/8/vMcw8Oz5Sfo5XR69pv//vMfxR9u7t4upw/O hz/8/Efwp9tXH5Y7vd89W66al2/hT8/mjuLl5rOWS/vPe/F/8/bDzePzYbJcH3r/9B0sG3/zqfK9 xxLUkYTPdBze8dORLBuf6zu5/NLfzuXX5zm29HQ86TN9P+o7mTuG/oHzgzmf3t58+fzDmy++/M3/ cH8I//O//A/3+8vh6XJ4DP/zH14uk3+8bB2Wrec//fuv+qQ+b019jb/77eVG4Jv7pRR8vbfvX/fr m5vXr+9vHx7WW03uX5LcHjl/zl/6rXF/vhelPvzd5cMhn++/9FuY/+vF3fvXt+dPxwd0nP2W65+/ /gJ3L5rLJV7+7vmD6w33styX5LZ+9HLMsXBaP3A5Ts/x7nxPp9+q/erflhuz/ejef3i8e/Pdiw/v X3z6+Prmcblr8ObF/c37r2+fvrVD+GL9U/b+Gf78T/LRf1o++vzZ5cmPL75Zbu9++dy9/G/9KGj9 OH7k3b37eHkI8vKxh2/Oj0jfvvvq9vX6oZtXj5+WL2K5OLz/44eb1+dr8MtXudxZ+fr2e4/iT7fL zeRXeE7l5zvWl0/n/PdeVPb7o5ZU0WQ/anf8ozZeftReDk+Xw2PEj9rL1iFO/ajNhVwKdVkuh+rk 2EzsVs16hupzdPIstdSuKrV0Se1yeLocHhNSu2wd0lRqkaPjuP7WqW0mltp6hkZ1jkZLbcep5Utq l8PT5fCYkdpl65CnUqMSXaPoU0ylBnUGbyeW2nqGqstM+EwXGkvt7yI1vqR2OTxdDo+M1C5bB55K bTip0+zpvOuksjrnsiW146TKJanL4elyeCxI6rJ1KDNJxZrUSX3esqTWM05d2ievvC2p60qqXpK6 HJ4uh8eKpC5bhzqVFLfgoi/LcjlUeW0mltp6hqo7qGHuLqmldl2ptUtql8PT5fDYkNpl69CmUss5 uyy/1Bm8nVhq6xla1TlaLbUdp0b+0lpfTn05LkvPrW8fztsTwaVQ3fooPSX1kNl2YsGtZ6u6ARDm rvItuCsLjnpw1IOjHhytwVEPjqaCi+RdTKmGkivrZ163EwtuPcn0HVqTQLsOrlOgvpz6cqRVA/Xt A015oBj0CX7esrDWk0b/9DH3seuwOvzoy6kvR1rtR98+0JT+iL6xKyVRiznVqB8W2UwsOPlZpH8S WXB7Dq7zj76c+nKkVYD07QNNGZA4nODRni3Tt6r17WgLa89hdezRl1NfjrR6j759oCnxEZpvzrf1 t9awm4kFJ48b6UeKLLg9B9fJR19OfTnSqj769oGm3EeoIbocWiIqnIoObjOx4OSZEf1ciAW35+A6 COnLqS9HWk1I3z7QlAoJJQVXnx7N18/OjhMLbg1OP/loWmTXwXUu0pdTX460ipG+faApMxKY2bH8 0hxiM7Hg1uDUiTT5MgYL7sqC62ikL6e+HGl1I337QFNyJOSW3PJ//09Lv3Fgua25KTcSzY3sObfQ 3UhfTn05htWN9O1DmHIjIQd2kXKpLZXI2iBtJhbcGpx+hsTcyK6D626kL6e+HMPqRvr2IUy5kZCY XI51WS6H+gVX48SCWy84w2uLLLg9B4ddyGAfMtiJjOxFBruRmXIjIQ0neLJn254uIOoB22RuZNdh dTfSl1NfjmF1I337EKbcSIiJXOLl8HKgX+e4mVhw6wVHna/J3Miug+tupC+nvhzD6kb69iFMuZEQ anbyAP/A1zcTC2694ChPMvnSBwvuyoLrnqQvp74cw+pJ+vYhzHmSEIPLuVJsOaaqHxzZTCy49YKj LznmSXYdXPckfTn15RhWT9K3D2HOk1AlV0l+qy95M7Hg1guOut2dzJPsOrjuSfpy6ssxrJ6kbx/C nCehGF18+qWDGycW3HrB0TsSM0+y6+C6J+nLqS/HsHqSvn0Ic57EV3Ytcw5UYiMd3GZiwa0XHL2T TPMkuw6ue5K+nPpyDKsn6duHMOdJfDrfU4vUKNWmMeB2YsGtFxx1uzuZKNlzcLGLkr6c+nKMqyjp 24c4J0r+wwluYa0XEPWQbTI5suuwuhzpy6kvx7jKkb59iFNyhFpujmrkEhM3rZC2EwsOx5LVkWST I7sOrsuRvpz6coyrHOnbhzglR6jp9646b1lYa1hKjmSTI7sOC281g/eawZvNyLvN4O1mpuQI1Rpc fHp1qLrAbiYW3BqcOl+zyZFdB9flSF9OfTnGVY707UOckiNUEzsSW5x1cOPEgluDUw/NZpMjuw6u y5G+nPpyjKsc6duHOCVHqBK5GHzJqRC3qoMbJxbcGpy65GSTI7sOrsuRvpz6coyrHOnbhzglR6iU 4or80sFtJhbcGpy6GZBNjuw6uC5H+nLqyzGucqRvH+KUHKGSskt5/a1vUm4mFtwanGph8o0PLLgr C67Lkb6c+nKMqxzp24c4JUeoUHJP78RLOrhxYsGtwalHlibfu9iCu7Lguhzpy6kvx7jKkb59iFNy hLguWZHPgc+7QdDPt20mFtwanLrdnU2O7Dm41OVIX059OaZVjvTtQ5qSI8Q5OyohUSxN79N+M7Dc 1tzUz6RsnmTXuXVP0pdTX45p9SR9+5DmPAmH4ogqp+R5eMRkHFhuOBZWR8KmSXadW9ckfTn15ZhW TdK3D2lOk/BwIWVzkU9hqet6Nk2y67C6JunLqS/HtGqSvn1Ic5okl+hK8alR9VG/jeZ2YsGtwanz lU2T7Dq4rkn6curLMa2apG8f0pwmyam6WItvfHlzKB3cOLHg1uCUJmHTJLsOrmuSvpz6ckyrJunb hzSnSXKIrvq2LJdDHdw4seDW4NQlh02T7Dq4rkn6curLMa2apG8f0pwmycOFNNt9taew1DP9bGpk 12F1NdKXU1+OaVUjffuQ5tRIKuxaiL7w+VDfV9tMLLg1ONUCmxrZdXBdjfTl1JdjWtVI3z6kOTWS cnL5SWPp4MaJBbcGp9TI5Nv6WHBXFlxXI3059eWYVjXStw9pTo2kGFyNuQZfWx7uq20mFtwanLoZ MPk+IxbcdQWXuxrpy6kvx7yqkb59yHNqJBG582tFfa41xOEabpxYcGtw6iFbNjey6+C6G+nLqS/H vLqRvn3Ic24kNnLRp5hKDez1w/+biQWHYynqSIrJkV0H1+VIX059OeZVjvTtQ56TI7GQS0/AXwc3 Tiy4NTglSiZfEGHBXVlwXZT05dSXY15FSd8+5DlREnNwRIEL+8wx6eDGiQW3BqfO12KiZNfBdVHS l1NfjnkVJX37kOdESfyh3ZBvJxbcGpw6kYqJkl0H10VJX059OeZVlPTtQ54TJZGy81xTW/7gebgP N04suDU4dckpJkp2HVwXJX059eWYV1HStw95TpSEVtzyf/9PX8GNA8ttzU09kFvMmew6t+5M+nLq yzGvzqRvH/KcMwlVX0iXLQtrDUtd5ot5kl2H1T1JX059OebVk/TtQ57zJIGjo1xqSyUutxJ1ZOPE gluDUw/YFvMkuw6ue5K+nPpyzKsn6duHPOdJQmJXclyW86F+enszseDW4JQnmXz5ugV3XcFx9yR9 OfXlyKsn6dsHnvMkIXrXEfLlUAc3Tiy4NTj1+NHk3pAsuCsLrnuSvpz6cuTVk/TtA895kkDZUW21 xERFP5G0nVhwOBZ953byrq0Fd2XBdU/Sl1Nfjrx6kr594DlPEoYLabBXtz2FpdxINTey67C6G+nL qS9HXt1I3z7wnBuher6+yvhPP6u2mVhwa3DqfK3mRnYdXHcjfTn15cirG+nbB55zI1SWe2RxOewH OrhxYsGtwak7tNXcyK6D626kL6e+HHl1I337wHNuhDI7Dpw9+5D0LlrHgeW25qYuN5PPiVhuV5Zb VyN9OfXlyKsa6dsHnlMjlIJ72rG/frZtM7Hg1uDUMySTb2dnwV1ZcN2N9OXUlyOvbqRvH3jOjVBo Du89en7VqA5unFhwa3CqhWqeZNfBdU/Sl1Nfjrx6kr594DlPQsQulOa5FS5puIYbJxbcGpy6m1vN k+w6uO5J+nLqy5FXT9K3DzznSchHl1INJVcO40Mm48SCW4NTNwMmr/gtuOsKrnRP0pdTX45l9SR9 +1DmPIlv3jUvv/UFdpxYcGtw6kSq5kl2HVz3JH059eVYVk/Stw9lzpP4Uh1n4ppji4H1BXacWHA4 lqaOpJkn2XVw3ZP05dSXY1k9Sd8+lDlP4pkdyy99k3IzseDW4NRTJ82cya6D686kL6e+HMvqTPr2 ocw5E5+Taykvy/lwuIYbJxbcGpw6X5s5k10H151JX059OZbVmfTtQ5lzJj5F13dqV7kNe+DaTCy4 NTjlTJo5k10H151JX059OZbVmfTtQ5lzJj4GF3L1nJa7a6RfhLOZWHBrcOqS00ya7Dq4Lk36curL sazSpG8fypw08YFcKJyX67CU9B65txMLbg1OSZNm0mTXwXVp0pdTX45llSZ9+1DmpIkn73LgiF0m 6AvsOLHg1uBUC82kya6D69KkL6e+HMsqTfr2ocxJE7+5kNqr3iQs9dOnmSjZdVhdlPTl1JdjWUVJ 3z6UKVHSanPcfAnEqSXtb7cTC05OMn0iWXA7Dq52UdKXU1+OdRUlfftQp0RJK83lRjVyiYmH+/2b iQW3nmRKlDQTJbsOrouSvpz6cqyrKOnbhzolShqfr8fW3/rG0jj4FXPrH3j/6d1Xt/cvXn14++nd +4cX97cfb28eb1+fT+W/syAtlr+PWLoG6cupL8e6apC+fahTGqSxxkRs97LUIz7DgzwW1p7D6uqj L6e+HOuqPvr2oU6pj5a9S8sB/teCaDOx5J6e1RieyLDk9pxcdx99OfXlWFf30bcPdcp9tESOnt5B VD/+vJlYck/P3A9P1ltye06uy4++nPpyrKv86NuHOiU/WgzOx1rj+YosZZ3cZmLJybHol816sx+7 Tq7bj76c+nKsq/3o24c6ZT9aiM5/7x6PtxNLTo5F74jdm/7YdXJdf/Tl1JdjXfVH3z7UKf3RKLnw vTv22U4sOTmW4XUO5j92nVz3H3059eVYV//Rtw91yn80nx2zj6XEXNPwAqzNxJKTYxlYmsmQXSfX ZUhfTn051lWG9O1DnZIhtRVHjQMT1xCS3vPoZmLJybEM9NpsyJ6Ta92G9OXUl2NbbUjfPrQpG1Jr dfXpl96RxmZiycmxjPtkseT2nFzXIX059eXYVh3Stw9tSofUet7TeGwptZwoDMmNE0tuPRbSx0Jm THadXDcmfTn15dhWY9K3D23KmNQSXAnyW9+w3EwsOUlu2Fu76ZNdJ9f1SV9OfTm2VZ/07UOb0ieV k1v+X//Te9neTCw5SU7rEzJ9suvkuj7py6kvx7bqk759aFP6pObi1qcBzocquc3EkpPktD6Z3DuE JXdlyXV90pdTX45t1Sd9+9Cm9ElNzeVccggUYtUvrdlOLDlJbnxbEktuz8l1fdKXU1+ObdUnffvQ pvRJTcGRl/0d6BuWm4klJ8lpfUKmT3adXNcnfTn15dhWfdK3D21Kn9SYnOyyjrN+C87NxJKT5LQ+ IdMnu06u65O+nPpybKs+6duHNqVPaiju8rYaXBvnIbnNxJKT5Mb3c7Xk9pxc1yd9OfXl2FZ90rcP bU6fBO8yhWW5HOp3dt9MLDlJbnjHO9Mne05uuRRdmsN6wno8rz07fORw+chEeBRdzi2G4GOsel83 24mFJ+Fpg0JmUPYdHiE8QniE8EjCI4Q3J1E8uxLCckPSl8z6WfFxYNmtxxL0sQRzKPvOLiC7gOwC sguSXUB2cxpFn+rV9iup8tLmZPJ2tuV1bXlF5BWRV0ReUfKKyGtKnpQWXaw1hVZy8KzO7O3EwpPw tDwJJk/2HV5CeAnhJYSXJLyE8Kb8Sansas0h5eaJo7qHsp1YeBKe9ieTL5i38K4tvIzwMsLLCC9L eBnhTSmUUr1LdTnsB0N448TCk/C0QgmmUPYdHiM8RniM8FjCY4Q3ZVFKSY5azKnGWrze0+t2YuFJ eNqiBLMo+w6vILyC8ArCKxJeQXhTIqXod5wq9iZTKi/tTibfstzyura8KvKqyKsiryp5VeQ1pU8K k2s+LcvlMOjWxomFJ+FpfRJMn+w7vIbwGsJrCK9JeA3hTRmUkvOSV85Elcjr+yjbiYUn4WmDEsyg 7Do8gkEhGBSCQSExKASDQlMGpWSvW7Pn5J7y0tJkcp8Ulte15QVpQpAmBGlCIk0I0oSmpElJyVFl n3i5AmP9E3s7sfDWY4n6WKJZk32HB2tCsCYEa0JiTQjWhKasSYnVJaYc6+VQPzWwmVh4Ep5WKNEU yr7Dg0IhKBSCQiFRKASFQnMKJQZXQ0qhpOqbfjXYdmLhSXhaoURTKPsODwqFoFAICoVEoRAUCs0p lFBcULv0UuFtJhaehKcVSjSFsu/woFAICoWgUEgUCkGh0JxCCeSqT8vduFAqNX2Nt5lYeBKeVijR FMq+w4NCISgUgkIhUSgEhUJzCoXYJSqNfEqlsLr3sp1YeBKeVijRFMq+w4NCISgUgkIhUSgEhUJz CoXIkfqlwxsnFp6Ep33K5PtgWnjXFh58CsGnEHwKiU8h+BSa8yk+u/PbqObQ0tKsvo+3mVh4Ep72 KdF8yr7Dg08h+BSCTyHxKQSfQnM+xXtXQmth+cN51eGNEwtPwtM+JZpP2XV4AT4lwKcE+JQgPiXA p4Qpn8ItO86BSmwUl3tzT1/4dmLhSXharkw+wWnhXVt4kCsBciVArgSRKwFyJUzJFW7LmZpKqsFT ivoNsrYTC289lqSPJZlc2Xd4kCsBciVArgSRKwFyJUzJFa7Zlac3LVBn9nZi4Ul4Wq4kkyv7Dg9y JUCuBMiVIHIlQK6EKbnC1buayXOsoZVadHjjxMKT8LRcSSZX9h0e5EqAXAmQK0HkSoBcCVNyhQs7 nznG6kMl1jc1NxMLT8LTcmXyfaEtvGsLD3IlQK4EyJUgciVAroQpucKFXFxuSBa6HAYd3jix8CQ8 LVcmH3Wy8K4tPMiVALkSIFeCyJUAuRKm5AozO376pW9qbiYWnoSn5UoyubLv8CBXAuRKgFwJIlcC 5EqYkivMweENRKgEfe9lO7HwJDwtV5LJlX2HB7kSIFcC5EoQuRIgV8KUXOFcXI4ppOUPy6ruvWwn Fp6Ep+VKMrmy7/AgVwLkSoBcCSJXAuRKmJIrnONyvUYhpFRb0a9O2E4sPAlPy5VkcmXX4UXIlQi5 EiFXosiVCLkS5+RKqm75f/1PP6q5mVh4Ep6WK5MnjIV3beFBrkTIlQi5EkWuRMiVOCdXUnKh5eiD p+V2pb6puZlYeOux6L1A0eReoCy8awsPciVCrkTIlShyJUKuxDm5ov0TT/qnfeelfUo2n7LvvOBT InxKhE+J4lMifEqc8ykxu8KUa0s+tqIp9GZi4Ul42qdMvme0hXdt4cGnRPiUCJ8SxadE+JQ451Mi uVyWuErkmvR7tW0nFp6Ep31KNp+y7/DgUyJ8SoRPieJTInxKnPMpobiUfavLtVqgrJ8m30wsPAlP +5RsPmXf4cGnRPiUCJ8SxadE+JQ451NCdLHwslwO9U3NzcTCk/C0T8nmU/YdHnxKhE+J8ClRfEqE T4lzPoWakzfP4qKeh9pOLDwJT/uUbD5l3+HBp0T4lAifEsWnRPiUOOdTKDvsEfp8qJ8m30wsPAlP +5TJ2+AW3rWFB58S4VMifEoUnxLhU+KcTyFyiVPjSjlUHsIbJxaehKd9SjafsuvwEnxKgk9J8ClJ fEqCT0lzPsUXl1tqkYuvVe89czux8CQ87VOy+ZR9hwefkuBTEnxKEp+S4FPSnE/x0ZUSc03NZx7D GycW3nosrI+FzafsOzz4lASfkuBTkviUBJ+S5nyKPtV58hTfd17ap0z+3LG8ri0v+JQEn5LgU5L4 lASfkqZ8Sm7sQomhUQs56Xty24mFJ+FpnzL5rtIW3rWFB5+S4FMSfEoSn5LgU9KUT8ktLPfXwvpf 1OGNEwtPwtM+hc2n7Ds8+JQEn5LgU5L4lASfkqZ8Sq7VtVx8zoFS0U+TbycWnoSnfQqbT9l3ePAp CT4lwack8SkJPiVN+ZRcs4u8HPaDosMbJxaehKd9CptP2Xd48CkJPiXBpyTxKQk+JU35lFzJVZLf QYc3Tiw8CU/7lMk7vxbetYUHn5LgUxJ8ShKfkuBT0pRPyaW6SDHk6Cl4vYOC7cTCk/C0T5nclZqF d23hwack+JQEn5LEpyT4lDTlU3JJrmYfWkueqA3hjRMLT8LTPoXNp+w6vAyfkuFTMnxKFp+S4VPy lE/JhZy810HWO6fdTiw8CU/7lMndZVt41xYefEqGT8nwKVl8SoZPyVM+JXN1PpUYy/ldy71+cGUz sfDWYyn6WIr5lH2HB5+S4VMyfEoWn5LhU/KUT8mcXPFZ3sZVhzdOLDwJT8uVYnJl3+FBrmTIlQy5 kkWuZMiVPCdXeLlB6WP2tRQanj8fB5adZKfdyuQtcMvu2rKDW8lwKxluJYtbyXArec6t5OoothxT rctNSn19t5lYeBKedivF3Mq+w4NbyXArGW4li1vJcCt5zq3k5BrF5ZZkaYWrfkxzM7HwJDztViZ3 sWbhXVt4cCsZbiXDrWRxKxluJc+5lUyuhESxtEjL7Uod3jix8CQ87VaKuZV9hwe3kuFWMtxKFreS 4VbynFtJ1eWn905WD5NvJxaehKfdSjG3su/w4FYy3EqGW8niVjLcSp5zKym7lOW3flHQZmLhSXja rRRzK/sOD24lw61kuJUsbiXDreQ5t5KCiyXUSjHnFvXT55uJhSfhabcyuYs1C+/KwmO4FYZbYbgV FrfCcCs851ZiczHkmgI35uGm5mZi4Ul42q0Ucyv7Dg9uheFWGG6Fxa0w3ArPuZXILlKoqREHT/rp hM3EwluPpepjqeZW9h0e3ArDrTDcCotbYbgVnnMrMbr49Eu/DHYzsfAkPO1WqrmVfYcHt8JwKwy3 wuJWGG6F59xK9C5WLsnHSKnp+3ibiYUn4Wm5MvkyRQvv2sKDXGHIFYZcYZErDLnCc3Ll/PYjJSzL 5VA/gb6ZWHgSnpYr1eTKvsODXGHIFYZcYZErDLnCc3IlJJebX64nW0wp6KcTNhMLT8LTcqWaXNl3 eJArDLnCkCsscoUhV3hOrgRyJTaKPsVU9M/y7cTCk/C0XKkmV/YdHuQKQ64w5AqLXGHIFZ6TK1Rd o7r+p59O2EwsPAlPy5VqcmXf4UGuMOQKQ66wyBWGXOE5uULsKDQfQ8jV671nbScWnoSn5Uo1ubLv 8CBXGHKFIVdY5ApDrvCcXKHoItdWY8sljNd448TCk/C0XJl82YaFd2XhFciVArlSIFeKyJUCuVLm 5AotZ2qsoZVaQhxef76ZWHgSnpYr1eTKvsODXCmQKwVypYhcKZArZU6u+OJa5GW5HOqnEzYTC289 lqaPpZlc2Xd4kCsFcqVArhSRKwVypczJFZ9d4Ei51JbKsB/pzcTCk/C0XGkmV/YdHuRKgVwpkCtF 5EqBXClzcsUHx1SqJ58KDbt+2EwsPAlPy5VJ0mPhXVt4kCsFcqVArhSRKwVypczJFX2qZ3sPPJWX 9imT+3qyvK4tL/iUAp9S4FOK+JQCn1KmfEpqxSXfYuAUUtU7p9tOLDwJT/uUZj5l3+HBpxT4lAKf UsSnFPiUMuVTUkuuphzZ15BKCjq8cWLhSXjapzTzKfsODz6lwKcU+JQiPqXAp5Qpn5JacNEXbqEf 6vDGiYUn4Wmf0syn7Ds8+JQCn1LgU4r4lAKfUqZ8SqrNlZYb1cglJvXY5XZi4Ul42qc08yn7Dg8+ pcCnFPiUIj6lwKeUKZ+y3Htbrtcap8TF+6zv420mFp6Ep33K5FslWXhXFl6FT6nwKRU+pYpPqfAp dcqnpHq+Jye/sw5vnFh4Ep72Kc18yr7Dg0+p8CkVPqWKT6nwKXXKp6QaXKLg2UdPg0/ZTiy8pwvr cEG18HYdHnxKhU+p8ClVfEqFT6lTPiXp/fOkyf3z7Dsv0hdHUyj7zgsKpUKhVCiUKgqlQqHUKYWS SnFM1JIPrY7Xa5uJhScXVn32elMo+w4PCqVCoVQolCoKpUKh1CmFkkp2YTlY/9fhjRMLTy6sUV9Q zafsOzz4lAqfUuFTqviUCp9S53xKCa55Tj4uV21Vv1xzO7Hw5MKa9AXVfMq+w4NPqfApFT6lik+p 8Cl1zqcU757ev5WGm5rjxMKTC2vWF1TzKfsODz6lwqdU+JQqPqXCp9Q5n8LVhRa44kCdNJuJhScX VtYXVPMp+w4PPqXCp1T4lCo+pcKn1Dmfwuw8LVdpZbkbV/Q+MrcTC08urEVfUM2n7Ds8+JQKn1Lh U6r4lAqfUud8CkdXuBLlloIfr/HGiYUnF9aqL6jmU3YdXoNPafApDT6liU9p8CltzqcwuRzrslwO NYXeTCw8ubA2fUE1n7Lv8OBTGnxKg09p4lMafEqb8ym5uRg9pZiTZ/2g5jiw7NazlvTFlEyn7Ds7 6JQGndKgU5rolAad0uZ0Si5O3jh5OdTdjRMLT8LTbmXyncgsvGsLD26lwa00uJUmbqXBrbQ5t5KT a4Xj+c19So6swxsnFp6Ep89eMrey7/DgVhrcSoNbaeJWGtxKm3MrObi63J6slUsLSbuVzcTCk/C0 WyFzK/sOD26lwa00uJUmbqXBrbQ5t5K9Kz6FkGNebjZFHd44sfAkPO1WyNzKvsODW2lwKw1upYlb aXArbc6tpOpyqxR9TURBP6a5mVh4Ep52K2RuZd/hwa00uJUGt9LErTS4lTbnVhK7TMShNM+t6AdX NhMLT8LTboXMrew7PLiVBrfS4FaauJUGt9Lm3EpKLj390vfxNhMLT8LTboXMrew7PLiVBrfS4Faa uJUGt9Lm3EoKLjaOFCMnn4fwxomFJ+FptzJpxy286wpvOT0u4WE9YT2e1x4ePnK4fGQmPO8iLzcl QyrFsz5pNhMLT8LTbmXyncgsvGsLjxAeITxCeCThEcKbcyuxupiZePnDsuoHVzYTC289c4O+oAaT K/sOLyC8gPACwgsSXkB4c3Il8nK99vRbhzdOLDwJT8uVyfdlsfCuLbyI8CLCiwgvSngR4c3JlZhc rI2SD4WSfsuN7cTCk/D02Tv5PIuFd23hJYSXEF5CeEnCSwhvTq7E4Jb/1/+G8MaJhSfhabkSTK7s O7yM8DLCywgvS3gZ4c3JlejdcnUWSswpsN5t3XZi4Ul4Wq4Ekyv7Do8RHiM8Rngs4THCm5Mrobr1 9QfLoX4Z7GZi4Ul4Wq4Ekyv7Dq8gvILwCsIrEl5BeHNyJbDjp19armwmFp6Ep+VKMLmy7/AqwqsI ryK8KuFVhDcnV0JypdTC5Jna8I5Am4mFJ+FpuRJMruw7vIbwGsJrCK9JeA3hzcmVcN53Zkm1tsql 6pNmM7HwJDwtVyb3AWXhXVl4BLlCkCsEuUIiVwhyhebkSiDnc+BIudTNNd44sfAkPC1XJu/8WnjX Fh7kCkGuEOQKiVwhyBWakyvUXKDYSiytkb4RtZ1YeOuZG/UFNZpc2Xd4kCsEuUKQKyRyhSBXaE6u UHGxUfQpplL1wwbbiYUn4Wm5Ek2u7Ds8yBWCXCHIFRK5QpArNCdXKLtc07JcDofwxomFJ+Hpszea XNl3eJArBLlCkCskcoUgV2hOrlB0pUXyMaUayhDeOLHwJDwtVyZJj4V3beFBrhDkCkGukMgVglyh OblCwXkqxCVWakWfNJuJhSfhabkSTa7sOzzIFYJcIcgVErlCkCs0J1fIu5B5WS6HurthYNlJdtqt RHMr+84OboXgVghuhcStENwKzbkVX10mz7GGVmrRRHozsfAkPO1WJl8tZeFdW3hwKwS3QnArJG6F 4FZozq14dqU0ZvLELWmpuZlYeBKedivR3Mq+w4NbIbgVglshcSsEt0JzbsVnt1yrhUYUWxhuaW4m Fp6Ep91KNLey6/AC3EqAWwlwK0HcSoBbCXNuxUcXmWJKOZaq9xe5nVh4Ep52K9Hcyr7Dg1sJcCsB biWIWwlwK2HOrXhyXM57EaPLosMbJxbeeuYmfUFN5lb2HR7cSoBbCXArQdxKgFsJc25Fn+pp8hTf d15ap0ze0ra8ri0v6JQAnRKgU4LolACdEqZ0SmzVxeRDqo0DZ3VmbycWnoSnz95kOmXf4UGnBOiU AJ0SRKcE6JQwpVNiY8ctBUq1sNfuYjux8CQ8rVOS6ZR9hwedEqBTAnRKEJ0SoFPClE6J7fwIJZVQ lz95ve/M7cTCk/C0TkmmU/YdHnRKgE4J0ClBdEqATglTOiW26FIKHMJSVx26GwaWnWSndcrk20ZY dteWHXRKgE4J0ClBdEqATglTOiU2cjVyiYlbrKXq7saJhSfhaZ2STKfsOzzolACdEqBTguiUAJ0S pnRKbN4t91Kax4EOb5xYeBKe1imTL7638K4tPOiUAJ0SoFOC6JQAnRKmdEqs1THHxoXp/M4/KrzN xMKT8LROSaZTdh1ehE6J0CkROiWKTonQKXFKpyw3Ip1f4iqJWsz6IrWdWHgSntYpk1DVwru28KBT InRKhE6JolMidEqc0imxZpdTIK5cljtzTYc3Tiy89czN+oKaTafsOzzolAidEqFTouiUCJ0Sp3RK 1Pvsi7abPpWX1inZdMq+84JOidApETolik6J0ClxTqfU4FLxRC0HaqSfM9hMLDwJT5+92XTKvsOD TonQKRE6JYpOidApcU6nVO+Wspblckg6vHFi4Ul4Wqdk0yn7Dg86JUKnROiUKDolQqfEOZ1SmkuJ OflIHLx+7HIzsfAkPK1TsumUfYcHnRKhUyJ0ShSdEqFT4pxOKeV8vVZybj7n4abmZmLhSXjap2Tz KfsODz4lwqdE+JQoPiXCp8Q5n1L4fE8u17pcVYamH0/ZTCw8CU/7lMmXZlh41xYefEqET4nwKVF8 SoRPiXM+pWTdmr1i/CkvrVCyKZR95wWFEqFQIhRKFIUSoVDinEIp0eXka+blDhvpd63ZTiw8CU8r lGwKZdfhJSiUBIWSoFCSKJQEhZLmFEoJzrfoQ1zuk1QablCOEwtPwtMKJZtC2Xd4UCgJCiVBoSRR KAkKJc0plLKcqZmX5XKonzTYTCy89cxlfUFlUyj7Dg8KJUGhJCiUJAolQaGkOYXCzYXoC7d+qMLb TCw8CU/7FDafsu/w4FMSfEqCT0niUxJ8SprzKVxcJfaN2nKHLuidOGwmFp6Ep8/eyRfZW3jXFh58 SoJPSfApSXxKgk9Jcz6F2SUKgWJJPumHDbYTC0/C0z6FzafsOzz4lASfkuBTkviUBJ+S5nwKZ+ep eaLkuer9gmwnFp6Ep33K5A5CLbxrCw8+JcGnJPiUJD4lwaekOZ/C0XGU30N448TCk/C0T2HzKfsO Dz4lwack+JQkPiXBp6Q5n8LBLT+1KfuWYmxaZG4mFp6Ep30Km0/Zd3jwKQk+JcGnJPEpCT4lzfkU 9q75EHLm2Hwb7uONEwtPwtNyhU2u7Ds8yJUEuZIgV5LIlQS5kubkSm4uZ5+ZSitFv6xlO7HwJDwt V9jkyq7Dy5ArGXIlQ65kkSsZciXPyZVcXfC15RxCrMOr7jYTC0/C03Jl8glOC+/awoNcyZArGXIl i1zJkCt5Tq5kdrWUGGJaTnP9juXbiYW3nrlFX1CLyZV9hwe5kiFXMuRKFrmSIVfynFzJeblBKb/0 gyubiYUn4Wm5MmnpLLxrCw9yJUOuZMiVLHIlQ67kObmS03kXtDnhQIc3Tiw8CU+fvcXkyr7Dg1zJ kCsZciWLXMmQK3lOruTgWiIq3F/aqsMbJxaehKflSjG5su/wIFcy5EqGXMkiVzLkSp6TK5kcp7os l0O9g4fNxMKT8LRcmbzza+FdW3iQKxlyJUOuZJErGXIlz8mV7F3k1Hj5Q9QkYzOw7CQ77VYmX5hv 2V1bdnArGW4lw61kcSsZbiXPuZXUnG9Pv1V3m4mFJ+Fpt1LMrew7PLiVDLeS4VayuJUMt5Ln3Eoq rgb2lVvmHPQNzc3EwpPwtFsp5lb2HR7cSoZbyXArWdxKhlvJc24lscvFx1aIqJF2K5uJhSfhabcy +RaAFt6VhcdwKwy3wnArLG6F4VZ4zq2k7GKIJS2X00LDLvw2EwtPwtNupZhb2Xd4cCsMt8JwKyxu heFWeM6tpOSWW5M+UPY56nsv24mFt565VV9Qq7mVfYcHt8JwKwy3wuJWGG6F59xKCq7mQilcDoeb muPEwpPwtFuZJKwW3rWFB7fCcCsMt8LiVhhuhefcSiJ33o8Y+fN7uOodtW4nFp6Ep8/eam5l3+HB rTDcCsOtsLgVhlvhObeSvEsh50iNUh3v440TC0/C026lmlvZd3hwKwy3wnArLG6F4VZ4zq3E5kJY 7himmnyr+nm8zcTCk/C0W5l8V04L79rCg1thuBWGW2FxKwy3wnNuJVbnlzsq3Dyd99auwxsnFp6E p+XK5Alj4V1beJArDLnCkCsscoUhV3hOrkR2NQXyeblzSMPO/TYTC0/C03KlmlzZd3iQKwy5wpAr LHKFIVd4Tq7E7JjTslwO9dMJm4mFJ+FpuVJNruw7PMgVhlxhyBUWucKQKzwnV2JyqaVSYqZGw879 NhMLT8LTcmXy1VIW3pWFVyBXCuRKgVwpIlcK5EqZkysxuqh+6fDGiYUn4Wm5Mvmok4V3beFBrhTI lQK5UkSuFMiVMidXYnBUWou+tFzTcB9vnFh465nb9AW1mVzZd3iQKwVypUCuFJErBXKlzMmVSM7H lGoouXLQ+xjbTCw8CU/LlWZyZd/hQa4UyJUCuVJErhTIlTInV0JztXHzJSz345p+OmEzsfAkPH32 NpMr+w4PcqVArhTIlSJypUCulDm5EqorXCgsfzivOrxxYuFJeFquNJMr+w4PcqVArhTIlSJypUCu lDm5EorjlH0mailHLVc2EwtPwtNyZdLSWXjXFh7kSoFcKZArReRKgVwpc3IlsMvRM4Ww3J0b3jlh M7HwJDwtVyZvg1t41xYe5EqBXCmQK0XkSoFcKXNyJWSXQiyhVoo5D9d448TCk/C0XJl8EyUL79rC g1wpkCsFcqWIXCmQK2VOroTklv/lPx3eOLHwJDwtV5rJlX2HB7lSIFcK5EoRuVIgV8qcXAnRhfj0 W4c3Tiw8CU/Llcnb4BbelYVXIVcq5EqFXKkiVyrkSp2TKyE4SoXzcjnlQsOjmuPEwpPwtFxpJlf2 HR7kSoVcqZArVeRKhVypc3IlkPPFh5iIYiG9e7/NxMJbTzJ9LPFzHYuF93cSHuRKhVypkCtV5EqF XKlzciXoS1GYO8X3nZe+9vfmU/adF3xKhU+p8ClVfEqFT6lzPoWqa5FrKb5wGq7XNhMLT8LTp5I3 n7Lv8OBTKnxKhU+p4lMqfEqd8ylUXK2+tFQ8Nf16su3EwpPw9ANN3nzKvsODT6nwKRU+pYpPqfAp dc6nELu6HOD/IbxxYuFJePqpFW8+Zd/hwadU+JQKn1LFp1T4lDrnUyi7UpdrteVGZQrDY5ebiYUn 4Wkw7s2n7Ds8+JQKn1LhU6r4lAqfUud8CiVX8nlnYZE9D2+3vJlYeBKePpW8+ZR9hwefUuFTKnxK FZ9S4VPqnE+h6ErIqS3349jrff9vJxaehKdvkHvzKfsODz6lwqdU+JQqPqXCp9Q5n0LBFR9zPaPn Ouw9czOx8CQ8Dca9+ZRdh9fgUxp8SoNPaeJTGnxKm/MpRI5rXZbL4fB0wjix8CQ8/eNp8n05Lbxr Cw8+pcGnNPiUJj6lwae0OZ9Cy5laGi95ZZ+G3dZuJhbe00k2nEoW3q7Dg09p8CkNPqWJT2nwKW3O p/i25FUStZhTjePP8mFi4T3dSBhuF1h4uw4PcqVBrjTIlSZypUGutDm54utyg5K4BB9yGV6DsJlY eE93i4d7whbersODXGmQKw1ypYlcaZArbU6u+OK4hWW5HA4PG4wTC+/pgeDhsV8Lb9fhQa40yJUG udJErjTIlTYnVzy74lvgTCUXGm5qjhML7+mpz+HZTgtv1+FBrjTIlQa50kSuNMiVNidXfHYlhvMb bpXzGyEMJmOYWHgS3vAQlMmVfYcHudIgVxrkShO50iBX2pxc8ckVpubT5XDAUOPEwpPwBt9jcmXf 4UGuNMiVBrnSRK40yJU2J1d8dKWVxDXmlEZ2rweWnWQ3voLDstt1dnArDW6lwa00cSsNbqXNuRUf XI2NiJc7cWHsbpxYeBKefgCKzK3sObzou1vBesJ6PK89PHzkcPnITHjkauWypJWHN/DeDCw7yW5A daZW9p0dITtCdoTsSLIjZDenVrx3LfkUay2UytDdOLHw1pPsb9kfhoV3beEFhBcQXkB4QcILCG9S rfwN++bZd17DPtXMpuw7r4i8IvKKyCtKXhF5TdmU5W6f85xT8Jl9ScOeH8eJhSfhDftUM5uy7/AS wksILyG8JOElhDdlU0KrjiJzyo1DicP72YwTC0/CG3ffa+HtOryM8DLCywgvS3gZ4U3ZlNCKC0tf IYRGXv8s304sPAlv3GG9hbfr8BjhMcJjhMcSHiO8KZsSGrvlf/lPhzdOLDwJb3gbTrMp+w6vILyC 8ArCKxJeQXhTNiW07GJNTLkf6vDGiYUn4WmbEsym7Du8ivAqwqsIr0p4FeFN2ZTQkkul5lDYl+V2 pQ5vnFh4Ep7WKcF0yr7DawivIbyG8JqE1xDelE4JLbpcSqvEmWIZbmqOEwtPwhvehtN0yq7DI+gU gk4h6BQSnULQKTSlU0ILjutyiAMd3jix8CS84W04zafsOzz4FIJPIfgUEp9C8Ck05VNCI1dajBQ9 t+aHN5IaJxbeGl7UsiCaT9l3ePApBJ9C8CkkPoXgU2jKp4Tm3VLV+pt0eOPEwpPwtFyJJlf2HR7k CkGuEOQKiVwhyBWalCve+egDUao+chzD0xMLT8LTciWaXNl3eJArBLlCkCskcoUgV2hOrtTmKDMH zp69fmp4O7HwJDwtVyZJj4V3beFBrhDkCkGukMgVglyhOblSq1v+l/90eOPEwpPwtFyJJlf2HR7k CkGuEOQKiVwhyBWakyu1uBQypVa8z8O7dG8mFp6Ep+VKNLmy7/AgVwhyhSBXSOQKQa7QnFyp7DIX 4kSlkR9uao4TC0/C03IlmlzZd3iQKwS5QpArJHKFIFdoTq7U7AqlZbkc6ifQNxMLT8LTciWaXNl3 eJArBLlCkCskcoUgV2hOrtTkKnPiWlPQLzPfDCw7yU67lWhuZdfZBbiVALcS4FaCuJUAtxLm3MpS lw+RuXJsPm+60xMLT8LTbmXyTSMsvGsLD24lwK0EuJUgbiXArYQ5t1Kjo5rPe6X1pbF+bcJmYuGt 4SXtVpK5lX2HB7cS4FYC3EoQtxLgVsKcW6nBxRxaIiqcinYrm4mFJ+Fpt5LMrew7PLiVALcS4FaC uJUAtxLm3Eoll0Nq4XyTMuidsW4nFp6Ep91KMrey7/DgVgLcSoBbCeJWAtxKmHQr3hVPJadY8+am 5jix8CQ87VYm9+Vr4V1beHArAW4lwK0EcSsBbiXMuZXSXK0x1vP+oKlpt7KZWHgSnnYrydzKvsOD WwlwKwFuJYhbCXArYc6tlPMu/FrhkhJVpjE8PbHwJDztVpK5lX2HB7cS4FYC3EoQtxLgVsKcWynV BfaVW+Y83sfbTCw8CU+7lWRuZd/hwa0EuJUAtxLErQS4lTDnVkpxKTOnElut+kbUdmLhSXjarSRz K/sOD24lwK0EuJUgbiXArYQ5t1LYcS6efaZa9OvMthMLT8LTcmVyB9sW3pWFFyFXIuRKhFyJIlci 5Eqckyslu8rBc22c83hTc5xYeBKelivJ5Mq+w4NciZArEXIlilyJkCtxTq4seflCHGOIpQ77kd5M LLw1vKzlSja5su/wIFci5EqEXIkiVyLkSpyTKyW59eUH50Md3jix8CQ8LVeyyZV9hwe5EiFXIuRK FLkSIVfinFwp0WV/fvXB5XAIb5xYeBKelivZ5Mq+w4NciZArEXIlilyJkCtxTq6U4EqQ3/rVCZuJ hSfhabky+bINC+/awoNciZArEXIlilyJkCtxUq6QazlxSSH4NuxjbDOx8CQ8LVeyyZV9hwe5EiFX IuRKFLkSIVfipFwhR5VT8lxKYx7D0xMLT8LTciWbXNl3eJArEXIlQq5EkSsRciVOyhXvlqu0vNxX IRp34L6ZWHgSnpYr2eTKvsODXImQKxFyJYpciZArcU6ucHPMoQWKqcbhTbo2EwtPwtNyJZtc2Xd4 kCsRciVCrkSRKxFyJc7JFa6u+ZI5+rBctenuhoFlJ9lpt5LNrew6uwS3kuBWEtxKEreS4FbSnFtZ 6qLMKaRcl4sqj93piYUn4Wm3ks2t7Ds8uJUEt5LgVpK4lQS3kubcCheXfEtluWoLvuqd2W4mFt4a Hmu3wuZW9h0e3EqCW0lwK0ncSoJbSXNuhXm5Hye/tNTcTCw8CU+7lcmXKVp41xYe3EqCW0lwK0nc SoJbSXNuhbNrobRSamzDjsm3EwtPwtNuZfL9qS28awsPbiXBrSS4lSRuJcGtpDm3suRFS1fFE+eS eAxPTyw8CU+7lUlXYOFdW3hwKwluJcGtJHErCW4lzbkVTi5xqL41KsMTw9uJhSfhabfC5lb2HR7c SoJbSXArSdxKgltJc26FoyvL7SWOl0NNpDcTC0/C025lcudrFt61hQe3kuBWEtxKEreS4FbSnFtZ 8vIUuVWOy1rG8PTEwpPwtFuZlHQW3rWFB7eS4FYS3EoSt5LgVtKkWwkutOwrNS6BNJHeTCw8CU+7 lcmHey28awsPbiXBrSS4lSRuJcGtpEm3Qi5XHyulQnF4Gm8YWHaSnXYrk4DVsruy7DLcSoZbyXAr WdxKhlvJk27FO9l7X2yDFxsnFp6Ep90Km1vZd3hwKxluJcOtZHErGW4lT7oV74iXQxyM4emJhbeG V7RbKeZW9h0e3EqGW8lwK1ncSoZbyXNuJTeXcsN/urtxYNlJdlqtTL6BkmV3bdlBrWSolQy1kkWt ZKiVPKdWcnVluTrzpRIX0l/4ZmLhSXharRRTK/sOD2olQ61kqJUsaiVDreQ5tbLk5TllYgrNx014 emLhSXharUzuhsbCu7bwoFYy1EqGWsmiVjLUSp5TK7m45ac250Q5pzbc0hwnFp6Ep9XK5I7XLLxr Cw9qJUOtZKiVLGolQ63kObWS2XFNqVEr49sEjQPLTrLTZqWYWdl3djArGWYlw6xkMSsZZiXPmZU8 XMXZtdpTXlqmFJMp+84LMiVDpmTIlCwyJUOm5DmZkrOL1CjVFnl4Y4RxYNlJdtqlFHMp+84OLiXD pWS4lCwuJcOl5DmXkpPjRM23SikGTaA3EwtPwtMypZhM2XV4DJnCkCkMmcIiUxgyhedkSo6ucV2W y+EQ3jix8CQ8LVOKyZR9hweZwpApDJnCIlMYMoXnZMqSV1iu03L0MUVPY3h6YuGt4VUtU6rJlH2H B5nCkCkMmcIiUxgyhSdlSnAcKZfaUhl473Zi4Ul42qZUsyn7Dg82hWFTGDaFxaYwbApP2hQ636DM PrZYvB/CGycWnoSnbUo1m7Lv8GBTGDaFYVNYbArDpvCkTSEXfW3e5xDHpw+GgWUn2WmZUk2m7Ds7 yBSGTGHIFBaZwpApPClTljM1h5IoU4pDdsPAspPstEup5lL2nR1cCsOlMFwKi0thuBSedCl+SM3y kry0P6nmT/adF/wJw58w/AmLP2H4E57zJ6m5mD2n1g/VF76ZWHgSnpYp1WTKvsODTGHIFIZMYZEp DJnCczIlVVd8Yo6BQhp2SLuZWHgSnrYp1WzKvsODTWHYFIZNYbEpDJvCczYlnV/AEzzl7JcLEY/h 6YmFJ+Fpm1LNpuw6vAKbUmBTCmxKEZtSYFPKnE1J5fzmkVx9ojC8Pno7sfAkPG1TJt+NxcK7tvBg UwpsSoFNKWJTCmxKmbMpiV2p59uTsflxF+ybiYW3hte0TWlmU/YdHmxKgU0psClFbEqBTSlzNmXJ i3KsifvhGJ6eWHgSnrYpkztQs/CuLTzYlAKbUmBTitiUAptS5mxKyi6HFBpzydT0F76ZWHgSnrYp kyeMhXdt4cGmFNiUAptSxKYU2JQyZ1NScrWVlhvVyHrHBNuJhSfhaZ3STKfsOzzolAKdUqBTiuiU Ap1S5nTKklcoqfpG7KPPY3h6YuFJeNqnNPMp+w4PPqXApxT4lCI+pcCnlDmfkqLjnGoIMWYfhvDG iYUn4Wm50kyu7Ds8yJUCuVIgV4rIlQK5UiblSnQ+llYS15hTGsPTEwtPwtNyZXIXahbetYUHuVIg VwrkShG5UiBXyqRcCS6Fp986vHFi4Ul4Wq40kyv7Dg9ypUCuFMiVInKlQK6USblCrlJkfyYqNLzN 1mZi4Ul4Wq40kyu7Dq9CrlTIlQq5UkWuVMiVOilXyAV/fvSEsi/DXlU2EwtPwtNypZlc2Xd4kCsV cqVCrlSRKxVypU7KleVMPacVS27DRWo7sfDWi48+lvS5jsXC+zsJD3KlQq5UyJUqcqVCrtRJueKH 1iwvyYt0XuZT9p0XfEqFT6nwKVV8SoVPqXM+JTa3XHhS47Bce2X9hW8mFp6EF3R45lP2HR58SoVP qfApVXxKhU+pcz4lVld9buWc2Lh/zM3EwpPwog7PfMq+w4NPqfApFT6lik+p8Cl1zqcseQWKyz21 8122EMbw9MTCk/D0BcibT9l3ePApFT6lwqdU8SkVPqXO+ZRYHC8H+F/vpm8zsfAkvKzDM5+y7/Dg Uyp8SoVPqeJTKnxKnfMpS17LFZr8N4anJxaehMc6PPMp+w4PPqXCp1T4lCo+pcKn1DmfEtmlHIOn 5c5cSvpp8s3EwpPwig7PfMq+w4NPqfApFT6lik+p8Cl1zqfE7OpyDy7my6F+uetmYuFJeFWHZz5l 1+E1+JQGn9LgU5r4lAaf0uZ8ypJXaImocCo+tzE8PbHwJLymwzOfsu/w4FMafEqDT2niUxp8Spvz KTG5QrUGTj7X4c1HNhMLb734kPYpZD5l3+HBpzT4lAaf0sSnNPiUNudTlrwocUz9II/h6YmFJ+Fp uUImV/YdHuRKg1xpkCtN5EqDXGmTciW6XJjT+UWty6rDGycWnoSn5QqZXNl3eJArDXKlQa40kSsN cqVNypXovG/F1xJL5TSGpycWnoSn5crkq6IsvGsLD3KlQa40yJUmcqVBrrRJuRJcSjmH5X4cEQ3h jRMLT8LTF6DJE8bCu7bwIFca5EqDXGkiVxrkSpuUK+RqTT6XVsiP9/HGiYUn4Wm5MnnCWHjXFh7k SoNcaZArTeRKg1xpk3KFXAw5ego+VWpjeHpi4Ul4Wq6QyZV9hwe50iBXGuRKE7nSIFfapFzxrnBb lsuhfoeEzcTCk/C0XCGTK/sOD3KlQa40yJUmcqVBrrRJueJdoFxDibEOO1YZB5adZKfdCplb2XN2 yXe3gvWE9Xhee3b4yOHykYnsQnPM2RcqxcfhPfA2EwtPwtNuZfIWuIV3beERwiOERwiPJDxCeHNu ZcmLiFvK5Mu4X5XNxMJbLz5Bu5VgbmXf4QWEFxBeQHhBwgsIb86thOpyoRTq5XAIb5xYeBKedivB 3Mq+w4sILyK8iPCihBcR3pxbWfLyS1s+Zg7LtdsYnp5YeBKediuTL8y38K4tvITwEsJLCC9JeAnh zbmVUFyqlTJxrmUg0puJhSfhabcSzK3sO7yM8DLCywgvS3gZ4c25lcDuvEuVnNi3Nt7UHCcWnoSn L0DB3Mq+w2OExwiPER5LeIzw5tzKklei7FuKsbH+Wb6dWHgSnnYrk2+VZOFdW3gF4RWEVxBekfAK wptzKyG7WkPM/RWveo8rm4mFJ+FptxLMrew7vIrwKsKrCK9KeBXhzbmVJa+lLaLAhX3mMTw9sfAk PO1WgrmVfYfXEF5DeA3hNQmvIbw5txKSqyHFnFuh2oZrvHFi4Ul4Wq4Ekyu7Do8gVwhyhSBXSOQK Qa7QpFxJLrTmOaewXK3RGJ6eWHgSnpYrk486WXjXFh7kCkGuEOQKiVwhyBWalCvRlcLLcjnUr8bb TCy89eITtVyJJlf2HR7kCkGuEOQKiVwhyBWalCvRhZwrxZZjqnUMT08sPAlPy5XJF21YeNcWHuQK Qa4Q5AqJXCHIFZqUK8Gdd+xAzS+VDe+csJlYeBKelivR5Mq+w4NcIcgVglwhkSsEuUKTciW4oH6N 4emJhSfhabkSTa7sOzzIFYJcIcgVErlCkCs0KVfIFd+85xbqsGvy7cTCk/D0BSiaXNl3eJArBLlC kCskcoUgV2hSrpCjVikz1+BDHcPTEwtPwtNyZfKFihbetYUHuUKQKwS5QiJXCHKFJuXKcqbWxjlT CcPes7YTC0/C03Jl8i0lLLxrCw9yhSBXCHKFRK4Q5ApNyhXvqMZUz2+Al2MYw9MTC0/C03Jl8t3L LLxrCw9yhSBXCHKFRK4Q5ArNyRVqjkvjGCuXMFjNzcTCk/C0XJl8v04L78rCC5ArAXIlQK4EkSsB ciXMyZUlLyrV1+UPy0pjeHpi4Ul4Wq5Ekyv7Dg9yJUCuBMiVIHIlQK6EOblCdbleO7/eNdVWkn49 3mZi4a0Xn6TlSjK5su/wIFcC5EqAXAkiVwLkSpiTK0teVJ9+j+HpiYUn4Wm5kkyu7Ds8yJUAuRIg V4LIlQC5EubkChXHtfiSamhteHBlM7HwJDwtV5LJlX2HB7kSIFcC5EoQuRIgV8KcXFnyopZy8RRz SWUMT08sPAlPy5XJt4a38K4tPMiVALkSIFeCyJUAuRLm5AqxKz6FWltsPg/XeOPEwpPw9AUomVzZ d3iQKwFyJUCuBJErAXIlzMmVJa/lf/lvDE9PLDwJT8uVyf0eWnjXFh7kSoBcCZArQeRKgFwJc3KF sivRx7jcmas8XuONEwtPwtNyJZlc2Xd4kCsBciVArgSRKwFyJczJlSWvkJgjlzK8Y8nwcYtOotNq ZfKOr0V3bdFBrQSolQC1EkStBKiVMKlWkiucl0spF6I0PHk+Tiw8CU+rlWRqZdfhRaiVCLUSoVai qJUItRIn1UpyeGeEy+EYnp5YeBKeViuTqsDCu7bwoFYi1EqEWomiViLUSpxUK9FVXxPHkImHZxKG gWW3XniyNivZzMq+s4NZiTArEWYlilmJMCtx0qxEF9WvsTs9sfAkPG1WspmVfYcHsxJhViLMShSz EmFW4qRZCa6yj+TT8sc6PJEwTiw8CU+blckHei28awsPZiXCrESYlShmJcKsxEmzElysLVafo28l juHpiYUn4Wmzks2s7Ds8mJUIsxJhVqKYlQizEifNCrkWfA6teor6jTi2EwtPwtMXoGxmZd/hwaxE mJUIsxLFrESYlThpVsgtP7VLSqnF2MIYnp5YeBKeNivZzMq+w4NZiTArEWYlilmJMCtx0qx412rz 5C+Hw7N448TCk/C0WZl8HxcL79rCg1mJMCsRZiWKWYkwK3HSrHiXA0fKpbZU0hienlh4Ep52K9nc yr7Dg1uJcCsRbiWKW4lwK3HSrXjnOfNyk4lSGN6ScjOx8CQ87VayuZVdh5fgVhLcSoJbSeJWEtxK mnMrvjn23CrX1jLr8DYTC0/C024lm1vZd3hwKwluJcGtJHErCW4lzbmVJS/KPgYurcThebzNxMJb Lz6s5QqbXNl3eJArCXIlQa4kkSsJciXNyRVfHS9XaDlQiW14ZcJmYuFJeFquTL5loIV3beFBriTI lQS5kkSuJMiVNCdXlrxCCi17OrPMsTs1sOwkO+1W2NzKvrODW0lwKwluJYlbSXArac6t+OJKC8ty OdR7F9tMLDwJT7uVybu+Ft61hQe3kuBWEtxKEreS4FbSnFtZ8oopJgo5cGub8PTEwpPw9AWIza3s Ozy4lQS3kuBWkriVBLeS5tyKZ/f0jiRxCG+cWHgSnnYrbG5l3+HBrSS4lQS3ksStJLiVNOdWlrxS JqbQfAyBx/D0xMKT8LRbYXMr+w4PbiXBrSS4lSRuJcGtpDm3suTlfc01cvOtljE8PbHwJDztViZf H2zhXVt4cCsJbiXBrSRxKwluJc25FZ9d5rJctdXglys3fRaMEwtPwtNuhc2t7Dq8DLeS4VYy3EoW t5LhVvKkW8mOwpJW7odjeHpi4Ul42q2wuZV9hwe3kuFWMtxKFreS4VbypFtJbrkpWSPlzNkPT5+P EwtvvfgU7VaKuZV9hwe3kuFWMtxKFreS4VbypFtJLuQcqVGqLfIYnp5YeBKedivF3Mq+w4NbyXAr GW4li1vJcCt50q1EVwNxZp99y8NNzXFi4Ul4Wq4Ukyv7Dg9yJUOuZMiVLHIlQ67kSbkSz/tVqXGp q6ayCU9PLDwJT8uVyV3RWHjXFh7kSoZcyZArWeRKhlzJk3IluJbPeVXmOpKxcWLhSXj6AjT5+mAL 79rCg1zJkCsZciWLXMmQK3lSrgS33I87v9iVm9a/m4FlJ9lptzJ5Q8Cyu7bs4FYy3EqGW8niVjLc Sp50K8GRl9075LE7PbHwJDztVoq5lX2HB7eS4VYy3EoWt5LhVvKkWyG33IzkEgLXNt7QHCcWnoSn 3Uoxt7Lv8OBWMtxKhlvJ4lYy3EqedCvkwnKNxsQxhzB2pwaWnWSn1UoxtbLr7BhqhaFWGGqFRa0w 1ApPqhXvauS6rJdlOAuGiYUn4Wm1Ukyt7Ds8qBWGWmGoFRa1wlArPKlWvEtUcuQc0/BWi9uJhbde fKpWK9XUyr7Dg1phqBWGWmFRKwy1wpNqZTzVLS/JS9uUajZl33nBpjBsCsOmsNgUhk3hKZtCrblc 07Ish+rLHj9u0Ul02qVM3sq26K4tOrgUhkthuBQWl8JwKTzlUs5xUfEU0vJzO4Y6ZqcnFp6Ep11K NZey7/DgUhguheFSWFwKw6XwlEuhVl3JpXBsJZOWmNuJhSfh6QtQNZey7/DgUhguheFSWFwKw6Xw lEs55xVTIV9SrJ7KGJ6eWHgSnpYp1WTKvsODTGHIFIZMYZEpDJnCUzKFWnEtVkophlbbEN44sfAk PC1TJnefbeFdW3iQKQyZwpApLDKFIVN4Sqac88pn5ZyWP+VIY3h6YuFJeFqmTO5qxsK7tvAgUxgy hSFTWGQKQ6bwlEw553XeL2ZmLjHTJjw9sfAkPG1TqtmUXYdXYFMKbEqBTSliUwpsSpmyKdTYlUCR KJWchu6GgWUn2WmZUk2m7Ds7yJQCmVIgU4rIlAKZUqZkyrmuSM1TTT4NBHo7sfDWi0/TMqWZTNl3 eJApBTKlQKYUkSkFMqVMyRRq2TWqcbkxudxEjU2HN04sPAlPm5VmZmXf4cGsFJiVArNSxKwUmJUy aVayy9RiqoFr3YanJxaehKfdSjO3su/w4FYK3EqBWyniVgrcSpl0K+c9Yy6HOBjD0xMLT8LTbqWZ W9l3eHArBW6lwK0UcSsFbqVMupXkSmBijkE/OzV+3KKT6PSFp5lZ2Xd0MCsFZqXArBQxKwVmpUya leRipFZj9Zm5jtnpiYUn4WmzMrm3Cwvv2sKDWSkwKwVmpYhZKTArZdKsRNei/E46vHFi4Ul42qw0 Myv7Dg9mpcCsFJiVImalwKyUSbMSXU7LtVrxjUvZhKcnFp6Ep83KpKKz8K4tPJiVArNSYFaKmJUC s1ImzUp0lGvLsYQQ4yY8PbHwJDxtVibfAtfCu7LwKsxKhVmpMCtVzEqFWamTZiW4UsjXFGOJaXgq YZxYeBKeVivN1Mq+w4NaqVArFWqlilqpUCt1Uq0EF2sqvFyzNV/qGJ6eWHg4lqyPJX+uY7Hw/k7C g1qpUCsVaqWKWqlQK3VSrQxP29kzdU95kc7LbMq+84JNqbApFTalik2psCl10qaQY+LCnLh4Hp6r GycWnoQXdHhmU/YdHmxKhU2psClVbEqFTamTNoVciNnnVti3vAlPTyw8CS/q8Mym7Ds82JQKm1Jh U6rYlAqbUidtinc1p1p8KTmm4Z7cOLHwJLykwzOfsu/w4FMqfEqFT6niUyp8Sp30Kd6lwstyOaQx PD2x8CS8rMMzn7Lv8OBTKnxKhU+p4lMqfEqd9Cne+dY8/h+7UwPLTrJjnZ3plH1nB51SoVMqdEoV nVKhU+qcTqnNlRBj8JQr6fsu24mFJ+EVHZ7plH2HB51SoVMqdEoVnVKhU+qcTlnyiqkRhRTYRx7D 0xMLT8KrOjzTKbsOr0GnNOiUBp3SRKc06JQ2p1Nqda1wLKXlUIbHNDcTC0/Cazo80yn7Dg86pUGn NOiUJjqlQae0OZ2y5MU+k68+D88LbwaW3ZodaZtCZlP2nR1sSoNNabApTWxKg01pczZlqSvEHFoi KqzfZGs7sfAkPK1WJvdpaOFdW3hQKw1qpUGtNFErDWqlzamVWlxlbstNyRba8L4Im4mFJ+FptTK5 xwsL79rCg1ppUCsNaqWJWmlQK21OrSx5bWqzxJ4S0z6FzKfsOzH4lAaf0uBTmviUBp/S5nzK0hTF lH1oIbZSxtr0xMKT8LRPIfMp+w4PPqXBpzT4lCY+pcGntDmfUtmV4lOonnJm/aLWzcTCk/C0TyHz KfsODz6lwac0+JQmPqXBp7Q5n7LklXwpy922tly30Rienlh4Ep4WKmRCZd/hQag0CJUGodJEqDQI lTYpVNj5xJmIQ2m+jOHpiYUn4WmhMvn2fxbetYUHodIgVBqEShOh0iBU2qRQyY4rc46lUBmeJx8G lp1kp30KmU/Zc3bZd5+C9YT1eF57dvjI4fKRuexiqMvSD8fu9ORvD09/ZPgr+K57fP/yze3tY3j+ PVk+3tD64Y/3d+8fl2/p5u3D7TbVD28/vXv/PX/91Qf5669v39x8evt4+VJf6M/5fR88f/mT/83w Gf7N8hn+zfQZ/s34Gf7N+hn+zc9xvvN/9t/8W69yHh6Xy/7XT52eHr+5vX9/+/js4ePt7etnvzn9 w9/8M217FP/47sOn94/LZz57/+H17cOz3/zjz38cx5uPN6/uHr979unh/F38689/DL+/e/j3Z6/W o/nN7z/PMTw8+3h7fzmdnv3mv//8R/GHm7u3y+mD8+EPP/8R/On21Yc/395/9+zx7t3yLfzp2dxR 7PkWF6sj4c/mo/Tr285bn+d4aHuLi+wW13CLq/uorqO6jVplVHdRUyqK2bH6pe4vbydTX/vvfvv6 /ubbL97cLw3h+7h9/7pfE928fn1/+/Cw3p5y/1eSa6zz5/zlfFErgcrde/3h784fplDPH7382//r xd3717fnz8YHdLVf3y/XrA9//vqLb+9eP37z5fPquLR8/rvnD35ze/f1N8uNtOJqJfno5Yh9inH9 wOUofWzn48Q39OGrf7t99diP7/2Hx7s337348P7Fp4+vbx5vX3x48+L+5v3Xt0/f2jF8sf6plWf4 4z/JB/+pLben/vL27v2/f/HN/e2bL5+7l/+tH0FYP44fhXfvPr69XT/28M2Hb798fvvuq9vX64du Xj1+Wr6E5ULy/o8fbl6fr9kvX+Pdu5uvb7/3KP50+/Htzavbd7fvHx9+xmN9+XS+f+8FxX4E/20/ gof7vJ/rxY72I/hHfgR3KdedXFdyq5HrQm7Kx1V1Qte509hu0/zNQZUhqM/0ELEF9WMP3vaHbvsD t/1h2/VB2/6Q7UxQLbqofz19sduJxfbLxlaH2D7TA8MW2489ZNsfsO0P1/YHa9eHavsDtVMP0/rh foJ+WnIzsdh+2djaENtnerGixfYjsXX/1vVbt2+rfOvubU69BX1KB7ux+MsmRbqoz/RqKAvqR4Lq rq2rtm7aVtHWPducZovjLUJ1sm8mltovm9rYmsX268TWLVuXbN2xrYqtG7Y5wZZ+8KZispuKv2Zs YYjtM73c0GL7kdi6X+t6rdu1Va51tzan1vRFhyYvO5bU35xUHJL6TC8vtKR+JCnqOK0vp74caZVp fftAcy6t/OBNxmI3GX/N5NKQ3Ge6iFpyP5Zc321SX059OdK6z6S+faDJPSb94A3Hajccf83kBhH0 uV5SaMn9WHKdBPXl1JcjrSqobx9oygWFjXm3sH7ZsAbn8bleMmhh/VhYHXr05dSXI63Wo28faEp7 BPqhm4/biSX3yyY3SJDP9WJBS+7HkusUpC+nvhxp1SB9+0BTHiSEH7r5uJ1Ycr9scoMH+VwvFLTk fiy5DkL6curLkVYT0rcPNKVCQtI3H5PdfPyFwxrsB5n9+JXC6vijL6e+HGn1H337QFMCJOQfvPmY 7ebjr5jc8BSaPYP2KwXXcUhfTn050upD+vaBpoRI4B+88ch24/HXDG4QIsGEyK+UXCcifTn15Uir EunbB5pyIkG/IibYS2J+6bDGqzK7LvuVwuocpC+nvhxpFSF9+0BTJiT8/+2d3W4cxxGFX4XwlXJh hNPd83cTwN1qXwcO8gAMtY6FSKQgrgLo7UP5bElTE7fpsjhdEHCuDootcc3Rfu7h9nd21+bN48qb R0/klC0SaIv4IBdgiyAqogSxRTDnYLJFYrMes18hcn2RU7ZIoC3ihBxsEURFlCC2COYcTLZI3JZk IksyvcFSTkigE+IE1uVtYi7vE3N5o5jP7xRzeasYkxMSm2WZ/QqR64ucskUCbREn5GCLICqiBLFF MOdgskWiLsZs/p33K0SuL3LKFgm0RZyQgy2CqIgSxBbBnIPJFonbJ1BkcaY3WMoJCXRCnMCCE4Ko iBLECcGcg8kJic3izH6FyPVFTtkigbaIE3KwRRAVUYLYIphzMNkisVmc2a8Qua7Iqdf7+XK/E3Cw RRAVUYLYIphzMNkiaXu9E2szvbFSTkikE+IEFpwQREWUIE4I5hxMTkhq1mb2K0SuL3LKFom0RZyQ gy2CqIgSxBbBnIPJFknN2sx+hcj1RU7fPfL20Qe5CFsEURElii2COUeTLZK2tZnE2kxvsJQTEumE OIEFJwRRESWKE4I5R5MTkpq1mf0KkeuLnLJFIm0RJ+RgiyAqokSxRTDnaLJFUrM4s18hcn2RU7ZI pC3ihNzlQ2QunyJz+RiZz58jc/kgGZMtkrbFmcTiTG+wlBMS6YQ4gQUnBFERJYoTgjlHkxOSmsWZ /QqR64ucskUibREn5GCLICqiRLFFMOdoskXGZnFmv0Lk+iKnbJFIW8QJOdgiiIooUWwRzDmabJFx W5wZWZzpDJZ68ZGvPTphBScEURElihOCOUeTEzI2azP7FQLXFzhliyTaIk7IwRZBVESJYotgztFk i4zNT5rZrxC5vsgpWyTRFnFCDrYIoiJKFFsEc44mW2TcPoFG1mZ6g6WckEQnxAesBCcEUREliROC OSeTEzI2azP7FSLXFzn9Cxt/Y3NCDrYIoiJKElsEc04mW2Rs1mb2K0SuL3LKFkm0RZyQgy2CqIiS xBbBnJPJFpmu1ROIt4+dwVJOSKIT4gQWnBBERZQkTgjmnExOyNQszuxXiFxf5JQtkmiLOCEHWwRR ESWJLYI5J5MtMjWLM/sVItcXOWWLJNoiTsjBFkFURElii2DOyWSLTNvizMTiTG+wlBOS6IQ4gQUn BFERJYkTgjknkxMyNYsz+xUi1xU59UoIXwhxAg62CKIiShJbBHNOJltkatZm9isEri9wyhYZaYs4 IQdbBFERJYktgjknky0ybWszE2szvcFSTshIJ8QJLDghiIooSZwQzDmZnJCpWZvZrxC5vsgpW2Sk LeKD3AhbBFERZRRbBHMeTbbI3KzN7FeIXF/klC0y0hZxQg62CKIiyii2COY8mmyReVubmVmb6Q2W fiWEL4U4gQUnBFERZRQnBHMeTU7I3CzO7FeIXF/klC0y0hZxQg62CKIiyii2COY8mmyRuVmc2a8Q ub7IKVtkpC3ihBxsEURFlFFsEcx5NNki8/YJNLM40xss5YSMdEKcwIITgqiIMooTgjmPJidk1vWY zUXZrxC5vsgpW2SkLeKEHGwRREWUUWwRzHk02SJzszizXyFyXZFTv7Dx9zUn4GCLICqijGKLYM6j yRZZttd7YW2mN1bKCZnohDiBBScEURFlFCcEcx5NTsjSrM3sV4hcX+SULTLRFnFCDrYIoiLKKLYI 5jyabJGlWZvZrxC5vsgpW2SiLeKD3ARbBFERZRJbBHOeTLbIsq3NLKzN9AZLOSETnRAnsOCEICqi TOKEYM6TyQlZxtZrj/sVItcXOWWLTLRFnJCDLYKoiDKJLYI5TyZbZGkWZ/YrRK4vcvrFR7766IQc bBFERZRJbBHMeTLZIsu2OLOwONMbLOWEGP+/RrCeDSw4IYiKKJM4IZjzZHJClrV5+7jy9tETOWWL TLRFnJCDLYKoiDKJLYI5TyZbZG0WZ/YrRK4vcsoWmWiLOCEHWwRREWUSWwRznky2yLotzqwsznQG S9098ubRCSs4IYiKKJM4IZjzZHJC1ti6edyvELi+wClbZKYt4oQcbBFERZRJbBHMeTLZImuzNrNf IXJ9kVO2yExbxAk52CKIiiiT2CKY82SyRdbtE2hlbaY3WMoJmemE+IA1wwlBVESZxQnBnGeTE7I2 azP7FSLXFzlli8y0RZyQgy2CqIgyiy2COc8mW2Rt1mb2K0SuL3LKFplpizghB1sEURFlFlsEc55N tsjwfxecaPVFS1khM60QJ7RghSAqosxihWDOs8kKGa51Q2Z78fUKkeuLnH7Fny/5OyEHXwRREWUW XwRznk2+yHCtGjLz9uLrFSLXFznli8z0RZyQgy+CqIgyiy+COc8mX2S4TuqCszzTGy3lhcz0QpzQ gheCqIgyixeCOc8mL2S4Hps3kCNvIP2QU5sZ9zIn4GCMICqizGKMYM6zyRgZrqfm7ePE20dH4JQx stAYcUIOxgiiIsosxgjmPJuMkeF6URec5ZneaCkzZKEZ4oQWzBBERZRZzBDMeTaZIcP12rx9XHn7 6IicckYWOiM+yC1wRhAVURZxRjDnxeSMDMN16wZyt0Lk+iKnnJGFzogTcnBGEBVRFnFGMOfF5IwM w7Y982kiWn3RUm7IQjfECS24IYiKKIu4IZjzYnNDhti6gdytELm+yClnZKEz4oQcnBFERZRFnBHM ebE5I0Nq3kAm3kA6IqeckYXOiBNycEYQFVEWcUYw58XmjAyTuoFkhaY3Wvo4jedpTmjBDUFURFnE DcGcF5sbMszNG8iZN5COyClnZKEz4oQcnBFERZRFnBHMebE5I8PSvIFceAPph5wijsA5AQdnBFER ZRFnBHNebM5IUBc8sEDTGyzlhqx0Q5zQghuCqIiyiBuCOS82NyQ0CzSBBRpP5JQzstIZcUIOzgii IsoizgjmvNickdAs0AQWaDyRU87ISmfEB7kVzgiiIsoqzgjmvNqckaAKNIEFmt5oKTdkpRvihBbc EERFlFXcEMx5tbkhoVmgCSzQeCKnnJGVzogTcnBGEBVRVnFGMOfV5oyEZoUmsELjiZxyRlY6I07I wRlBVERZxRnBnFebMxJUhSawQtMbLeWGrHRDnNCCG4KoiLKKG4I5rzY3JDQrNIEVGk/klDOy0hlx Qg7OCKIiyirOCOa82pyR2KzQRFZoPJHTJ9g8wnZCDs4IoiLKKs4I5rzanJGoKjSRFZquaG3Or3l4 7QQVvBBERZRVvBDMebV5IbFZnonPXZ7ZfkX9lcvPC+D+8cvpdI7f/QaK55tBvvzu/eu78+OPdPPm 4bTH8/7Nh7d3v/HXb+8///VXp59vPrw5//qf+v32z7zEwnd//cPfMxzwPecDvmc64HvGA77ncsD3 /NP/7l+7JTycH5+n//7CVD3/cnp/dzpfPbw7nV5dvah/+er/8+wf4oe39x/uzo9/8uru/tXp4erF D8//GOXm3c3t6/PHqw8Pn36Kfz7/I7x8/fCfq1t5mBcvj3mEh6t3p/e/XqerF39//of48eb1m8fr c/l3+PH5H+Cn0+39f0/vP16dX799/BF+uvr9h+Dtz1f9ZqEEvoNugcL+FigceQu02e2PMjX+9E1j 4xYIR0E4CcJBkJwD4RjI+q7yf/zZSXq+jh51ljocdJZKfp7gB+c6ONbBqY4c6uBMx3akM26fnyP5 OZAf5bIepLKSnifowdENTm5wcCPnNji2MZ3ahN2VJj0H0qN2n8Ddx4cfnMPgGAanMHIIgzMY0xFM 2O4+gbvPkfworfugZxvpeYIeHKngRAUHKnKeguMU02lK3F7pyN3nUHrU7hO5+/jwc3kndrx1Ld65 Vt64Fu9ba+Jnu/tE7j5H8qOaD0cd1pGe36fnUpxFiQ8dPqnwocFnoSdtr3Ti7nMoPWr3Sdx9fPhB CxYlWHRgpQKLBqypAJu2u0/i7nMkPwof0uNDz4BGK6IiyiCNVsx5MDVax+31HrkHHcqQhogUOVGE 8iqiIsog5VXMeTCVV8ftTjRyJzqSItWNO6gaR4aeYggKAqIiyiAWAuY8mDyE6Vo9fcjQkQypnWji TuREEUQEREWUQVwEzHkw2QjTdieauBMd+mm+W4gOapKSoacYgo6AqIgyiJGAOQ8mJ2HeXu+ZO9Gh DKmdaOZO5EQRpARERZRBvATMeTCZCfN2J5q5E33rH3JNhp5iCGoCoiLKIHYC5jyY/IRle70X7kTf /mejkaKnKIKggKiIMoijgDkPJkth2e5EC3eib/2t88nQUwxBU0BURBnEVMCcB5OrsG6v98qd6Nt/ x0VS9BRFkBUQFVEG8RUw58FkLKzbnWjlTvQtv1EH+XmCnwBbAVERJYitgDkH2/tvX++eoFaCtl95 nC7f/eHd+9PNq4dP77nx5Yv/un/18cv06v72w9vT3fn72/u782P+7X9QSwcILWdoW6ZlAAAaaggA UEsDBBQACAgIADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbAAAAT2JqZWN0UmVwbGFjZW1lbnRzL09iamVjdCAx 7L0J3NdVmf7/dQEFVEBZlE1ABZRF2UEBlUXBBVDUVBzF/kq5lEsp/lzKZXIptXEptVwqtVwmtQkt l3IptVzKZXIZl8alFHMpl1JM+F/n+Z7rnG9H8X/P/LzPfeJ/nJdeeD/A+309n+tj8TjpHtN22nm3 7VZpjGw0f1ul0bvR+tu/zG80PtgX9+0bjVe2azT/xH1j2qhG42v47qvitnz5SfhWl5Yf9nd8ryXb xe/Rv3EyvjUA31q1DbBq29X95r7XKuHH4PoN/Onq/oPf9D+8Q+Mr+Fa7NtTyxir/6v+k+duqqzR+ iVivsefcbXebud2snXbab96MXfabOmP7WbPdx3/QVuu7bX8c2/bH9o0vb+7rNGI2fDumu8fvd+Ly tt/4HVcJP+TPWzc+9rfk4yd+6Fvx0jgMbcf9rxXdZ8J9crsmn4kZs6fzB3+l9TP3D5/Gz/gn+CZK ut877ddovLud5Ec8gc/Fv+D3H8xrNDaaHr/Tj3/8Y/f4VmmcjT/p3nSat9uuc3ac8Y/P57C2wge1 /XE0/ti+0WNYo3HJNo3GPu1idsIOHto1prvz+/mVxPzwb6v9w5/9g+I/NPwcvuec/5XEqo0ejdZd /ONv+DT0bYSRtnwaWh7Ohz5xn//4T9ycNt6stj+u5xhtThd714tln5h/FP74T8zmHwkppfiIcU2n EeMUi7dCSil+x9Cmk0u14q2QUorPG9B0cqlWvBVSSvE/9Gg6/aGHYvFWSCnFF63VdHKpVrwVUkrx jqs2nVyqFW+F/N8X///+bw6zcfk7EAcjr9nmk/hUOftR2yr/B2AKKWEj/78tfop3OkWzeAqpxQ2L X+udrtUsnkJqccPij3qnRzWLp5Ba3LD4+97pfc3iKaQWNyy+Ufumk0u14imkFjcsvoN32kGzeAqp xQ2LH+mdjtQsnkJqccPi3/JO39IsnkJqccPid3mnuzSLp5Ba3LD4K97pFc3iKaQWNyzedY2mk0u1 4imkFjcsPtE7TdQsnkJqccPi+3un/TWLp5Ba3LD4Gd7pDM3iKaQWNyz+I+/0I83iKaQWNyz+pHd6 UrN4CqnFDYs31mw6uVQrnkJqccPiQ7zTEM3iKaQWNyw+1zvN1SyeQmpxw+LHeKdjNIunkFrcsPh3 vNN3NIunkFrcsPi93ulezeIppBY3LP6Gd3pDs3gKqcUNi/fs0HRyqVY8hdTihsW39k5baxZPIbW4 YfHPeKfPaBZPIbW4YfGve6evaxZPIbW4YfGbvNNNmsVTSC1uWPxZ7/SsZvEUUosbFm/fsenkUq14 CqnFDYuP8E4jNIunkFrcsPge3mkPzeIppBY3LH6CdzpBs3gKqcUNi1/pna7ULJ5CanHD4g96pwc1 i6eQWtyw+Dve6R3N4imkFjcs3rdT08mlWvEUUosbFp/unaZrFk8htbhh8UO906GaxVNILW5Y/Hzv dL5m8RRSixsWv8073aZZPIXU4obFX/ROL2oWTyG1uGHxtdZqOrlUK55CanHD4qO902jN4imkFjcs Pt87zdcsnkJqccPip3inUzSLp5Ba3LD4td7pWs3iKaQWNyz+qHd6VLN4CqnFDYsv9U5LNYunkFrc sPjAtZtOLtWKp5Ba3LD4Dt5pB83iKaQWNyx+pHc6UrN4CqnFDYt/yzt9S7N4CqnFDYvf5Z3u0iye Qmpxw+JLvNMSzeIppBY3LN51naaTS7XiKaQWNyw+0TtN1CyeQmpxw+L7e6f9NYunkFrcsPgZ3ukM zeIppBY3LH6Dd7pBs3gKqcUNiz/hnZ7QLJ5CanHD4o3OTSeXasVTSC1uWHyIdxqiWTyF1OKGxed6 p7maxVNILW5YfJF3WqRZPIXU4obFL/NOl2kWTyG1uGHxe73TvZrFU0gtblj8De/0hmbxFFKLGxbv 2aXp5FKteAqpxQ2Lb+2dttYsnkJqccPiC73TQs3iKaQWNyx+tnc6W7N4CqnFDYvf5J1u0iyeQmpx w+LPeqdnNYunkFrcsHj7rk0nl2rFU0gtblh8uHcarlk8hdTihsV39067axZPIbW4YfETvNMJmsVT SC1uWPxK73SlZvEUUosbFn/QOz2oWTyF1OKGxd/xTu9oFk8htbhh8T7rNp1cqhVPIbW4YfHp3mm6 ZvEUUosbFj/UOx2qWTyF1OKGxc/3TudrFk8htbhh8du8022axVNILW5Y/AXv9IJm8RRSixsW77Re 08mlWvEUUosbFh/tnUZrFk8htbhh8fneab5m8RRSixsWP8U7naJZPIXU4obFr/VO12oWTyG1uGHx R7zTI5rFU0gtblh8qXdaqlk8hdTihsUHdms6uVQrnkJqccPiO3inHTSLp5Ba3LD4kd7pSM3iKaQW Nyx+kXe6SLN4CqnFDYvf6Z3u1CyeQmpxw+JLvNMSzeIppBY3LN61e9PJpVrxFFKLGxaf6J0mahZP IbW4YfEF3mmBZvEUUosbFj/dO52uWTyF1OKGxW/wTjdoFk8htbhh8Se80xOaxVNILW5Y3Ck4J5dq xVNILW5YfIh3GqJZPIXU4obF53inOZrFU0gtblh8kXdapFk8hdTihsUv806XaRZPIbW4YfF7vdO9 msVTSC1uWPwN7/SGZvEUUosbFu/Rs+nkUq14CqnFDYtP8U5TNIunkFrcsPhC77RQs3gKqcUNi5/t nc7WLJ5CanHD4jd5p5s0i6eQWtyw+LPe6VnN4imkFjcs3m79ppNLteIppBY3LD7cOw3XLJ5CanHD 4rt7p901i6eQWtyw+Ane6QTN4imkFjcsfqV3ulKzeAqpxQ2LP+CdHtAsnkJqccPib3untzWLp5Ba 3LB4nw2aTi7ViqeQWtyw+HTvNF2zeAqpxQ2LH+qdDtUsnkJqccPi53mn8zSLp5Ba3LD4rd7pVs3i KaQWNyz+gnd6QbN4CqnFDYt36tV0cqlWPIXU4obFR3un0ZrFU0gtblh8vnear1k8hdTihsVP9k4n axZPIbW4YfFrvNM1msVTSC1uWPwR7/SIZvEUUosbFl/qnZZqFk8htbhh8YG9m04u1YqnkFrcsPgs 7zRLs3gKqcUNix/hnY7QLJ5CanHD4hd5p4s0i6eQWtyw+J3e6U7N4imkFjcsvsQ7LdEsnkJqccPi Xfs0nVyqFU8htbhh8QneaYJm8RRSixsWX+CdFmgWTyG1uGHx073T6ZrFU0gtblj8Bu90g2bxFFKL GxZ/wjs9oVk8hdTihsWXe6flmsVTSC1uWHxw36aTS7XiKaQWNyw+xzvN0SyeQmpxw+KLvNMizeIp pBY3LH6Zd7pMs3gKqcUNi9/jne7RLJ5CanHD4q97p9c1i6eQWtyweI9+TSeXasVTSC1uWHyKd5qi WTyF1OKGxRd6p4WaxVNILW5Y/GzvdLZm8RRSixsWv9E73ahZPIXU4obFn/FOz2gWTyG1uGHxdhs2 nVyqFU8htbhh8eHeabhm8RRSixsW39077a5ZPIXU4obFj/dOx2sWTyG1uGHxK7zTFZrFU0gtblj8 Ae/0gGbxFFKLGxZ/2zu9rVk8hdTihsX79G86uVQrnkJqccPi073TdM3iKaQWNyx+iHc6RLN4CqnF DYuf553O0yyeQmpxw+K3eqdbNYunkFrcsPgL3ukFzeIppBY3LN5pQNPJpVrxFFKLGxYf5Z1GaRZP IbW4YfG9vdPemsVTSC1uWPxk73SyZvEUUosbFr/GO12jWTyF1OKGxR/xTo9oFk8htbhh8aXeaalm 8RRSixsWHzCw6eRSrXgKqcUNi8/yTrM0i6eQWtyw+BHe6QjN4imkFjcsfpF3ukizeAqpxQ2L3+md 7tQsnkJqccPiL3unlzWLp5Ba3LB4l42aTi7ViqeQWtyw+ATvNEGzeAqpxQ2LL/BOCzSLp5Ba3LD4 6d7pdM3iKaQWNyx+vXe6XrN4CqnFDYs/7p0e1yyeQmpxw+LLvdNyzeIppBY3LD5446aTS7XiKaQW Nyw+xzvN0SyeQmpxw+KLvNMizeIppBY3LH6pd7pUs3gKqcUNi9/jne7RLJ5CanHD4q97p9c1i6eQ WtyweI9Nmk4u1YqnkFrcsPgU7zRFs3gKqcUNix/onQ7ULJ5CanHD4md5p7M0i6eQWtyw+I3e6UbN 4imkFjcs/ox3ekazeAqpxQ2LtxvUdHKpVjyF1OKGxYd7p+GaxVNILW5YfDfvtJtm8RRSixsWP947 Ha9ZPIXU4obFr/BOV2gWTyG1uGHxB7zTA5rFU0gtblj8be/0tmbxFFKLGxbvPbjp5FKteAqpxQ2L T/NO0zSLp5Ba3LD4Id7pEM3iKaQWNyx+nnc6T7N4CqnFDYvf6p1u1SyeQmpxw+LPe6fnNYunkFrc sHjHIU0nl2rFU0gtblh8lHcapVk8hdTihsX39k57axZPIbW4YfGTvdPJmsVTSC1uWPwa73SNZvEU UosbFn/YOz2sWTyF1OKGxd/zTu9pFk8htbhh8QGbNp1cqhVPIbW4YfFZ3mmWZvEUUosbFj/COx2h WTyF1OKGxS/0ThdqFk8htbhh8Tu80x2axVNILW5Y/GXv9LJm8RRSixsW77JZ08mlWvEUUosbFp/g nSZoFk8htbhh8QXeaYFm8RRSixsWP807naZZPIXU4obFr/dO12sWTyG1uGHxx73T45rFU0gtblh8 uXdarlk8hdTihsUHD206uVQrnkJqccPis73TbM3iKaQWNyx+tHc6WrN4CqnFDYtf6p0u1SyeQmpx w+L3eKd7NIunkFrcsPjr3ul1zeIppBY3LN59WNPJpVrxFFKLGxaf7J0maxZPIbW4YfEDvdOBmsVT SC1uWPws73SWZvEUUosbFr/RO92oWTyF1OKGxZ/xTs9oFk8htbhh8dWHN51cqhVPIbW4YfFh3mmY ZvEUUosbFt/NO+2mWTyF1OKGxY/3TsdrFk8htbhh8Su80xWaxVNILW5Y/H7vdL9m8RRSixsWf8s7 vaVZPIXU4obFe49oOrlUK55CanHD4tO80zTN4imkFjcsfoh3OkSzeAqpxQ2Ln+edztMsnkJqccPi t3inWzSLp5Ba3LD4897pec3iKaQWNyzecfOmk0u14imkFjcsPso7jdIsnkJqccPie3unvTWLp5Ba 3LD4Sd7pJM3iKaQWNyx+tXe6WrN4CqnFDYs/7J0e1iyeQmpxw+Lveaf3NIunkFrcsPiALZpOLtWK p5Ba3LD4LO80S7N4CqnFDYsf7p0O1yyeQmpxw+IXeqcLNYunkFrcsPgd3ukOzeIppBY3LP6yd3pZ s3gKqcUNi3cZ2XRyqVY8hdTihsXHe6fxmsVTSC1uWHw/77SfZvEUUosbFj/NO52mWTyF1OKGxa/3 TtdrFk8htbhh8ce90+OaxVNILW5YfJl3WqZZPIXU4obFB41qOrlUK55CanHD4rO902zN4imkFjcs frR3OlqzeAqpxQ2LX+qdLtUsnkJqccPi93inezSLp5Ba3LD4a97pNc3iKaQWNyzefXTTyaVa8RRS ixsWn+ydJmsWTyG1uGHxA73TgZrFU0gtblj8LO90lmbxFFKLGxZf7J0WaxZPIbW4YfGnvdPTmsVT SC1uWHz1MU0nl2rFU0gtblh8mHcaplk8hdTihsV38067aRZPIbW4YfHjvdPxmsVTSC1uWPxy73S5 ZvEUUosbFr/fO92vWTyF1OKGxd/yTm9pFk8htbhh8d5jm04u1YqnkFrcsPg07zRNs3gKqcUNix/s nQ7WLJ5CanHD4ud6p3M1i6eQWtyw+C3e6RbN4imkFjcs/rx3el6zeAqpxQ2LdxzXdHKpVjyF1OKG xUd6p5GaxVNILW5YfC/vtJdm8RRSixsWP8k7naRZPIXU4obFr/ZOV2sWTyG1uGHxh73Tw5rFU0gt blj8Pe/0nmbxFFKLGxbvP77p5FKteAqpxQ2Lz/ROMzWLp5Ba3LD44d7pcM3iKaQWNyx+oXe6ULN4 CqnFDYvf4Z3u0CyeQmpxw+IveaeXNIunkFrcsHjnCU0nl2rFU0gtblh8vHcar1k8hdTihsX38077 aRZPIbW4YfHTvNNpmsVTSC1uWPx673S9ZvEUUosbFn/MOz2mWTyF1OKGxZd5p2WaxVNILW5YfNDE ppNLteIppBY3LD7bO83WLJ5CanHD4kd7p6M1i6eQWtyw+CXe6RLN4imkFjcsfrd3uluzeAqpxQ2L v+adXtMsnkJqccPi3bdsOrlUK55CanHD4pO902TN4imkFjcsfqB3OlCzeAqpxQ2Ln+mdztQsnkJq ccPii73TYs3iKaQWNyz+tHd6WrN4CqnFDYuvvlXTyaVa8RRSixsWH+adhmkWTyG1uGHxed5pnmbx FFKLGxY/zjsdp1k8hdTihsUv906XaxZPIbW4YfH7vdP9msVTSC1uWPwt7/SWZvEUUosbFu81qenk Uq14CqnFDYtP9U5TNYunkFrcsPjB3ulgzeIppBY3LH6udzpXs3gKqcUNi9/inW7RLJ5CanHD4s97 p+c1i6eQWtyweIfJTSeXasVTSC1uWHykdxqpWTyF1OKGxffyTntpFk8htbhh8ZO800maxVNILW5Y /GrvdLVm8RRSixsWf8g7PaRZPIXU4obF3/VO72oWTyG1uGHx/lOaTi7ViqeQWtyw+EzvNFOzeAqp xQ2LH+6dDtcsnkJqccPiF3qnCzWLp5Ba3LD47d7pds3iKaQWNyz+knd6SbN4CqnFDYt33rrp5FKt eAqpxQ2Lj/dO4zWLp5Ba3LD4ft5pP83iKaQWNyx+qnc6VbN4CqnFDYtf552u0yyeQmpxw+KPeafH NIunkFrcsPgy77RMs3gKqcUNiw/apunkUq14CqnFDYvv7J121iyeQmpxw+JHeaejNIunkFrcsPgl 3ukSzeIppBY3LH63d7pbs3gKqcUNi7/mnV7TLJ5CanHD4t23bTq5VCueQmpxw+KTvNMkzeIppBY3 LH6AdzpAs3gKqcUNi5/pnc7ULJ5CanHD4ou902LN4imkFjcs/rR3elqzeAqpxQ2Lrza16eRSrXgK qcUNiw/1TkM1i6eQWtyw+DzvNE+zeAqpxQ2LH+edjtMsnkJqccPil3unyzWLp5Ba3LD4/d7pfs3i KaQWNyz+pnd6U7N4CqnFDYv3mtZ0cqlWPIXU4obFp3qnqZrFU0gtblj8YO90sGbxFFKLGxY/1zud q1k8hdTihsVv9k43axZPIbW4YfHnvNNzmsVTSC1uWLzD9KaTS7XiKaQWNyw+0juN1CyeQmpxw+J7 eae9NIunkFrcsPiJ3ulEzeIppBY3LH6Vd7pKs3gKqcUNiz/knR7SLJ5CanHD4u96p3c1i6eQWtyw eP8ZTSeXasVTSC1uWHymd5qpWTyF1OKGxQ/zTodpFk8htbhh8Qu80wWaxVNILW5Y/HbvdLtm8RRS ixsWf8k7vaRZPIXU4obFO2/XdHKpVjyF1OKGxcd5p3GaxVNILW5YfF/vtK9m8RRSixsWP9U7napZ PIXU4obFr/NO12kWTyG1uGHxx7zTY5rFU0gtblh8mXdaplk8hdTihsU32b7p5FKteAqpxQ2L7+yd dtYsnkJqccPiR3mnozSLp5Ba3LD4Jd7pEs3iKaQWNyx+t3e6W7N4CqnFDYu/6p1e1SyeQmpxw+Ld ZjadXKoVTyG1uGHxSd5pkmbxFFKLGxY/wDsdoFk8hdTihsXP9E5nahZPIbW4YfHF3mmxZvEUUosb Fn/KOz2lWTyF1OKGxVeb1XRyqVY8hdTihsWHeqehmsVTSC1uWHyed5qnWTyF1OKGxY/zTsdpFk8h tbhh8e95p+9pFk8htbhh8fu8032axVNILW5Y/E3v9KZm8RRSixsW77VD08mlWvEUUosbFp/qnaZq Fk8htbhh8YO800GaxVNILW5Y/BzvdI5m8RRSixsWv9k73axZPIXU4obFn/NOz2kWTyG1uGHxDjs2 nVyqFU8htbhh8ZHeaaRm8RRSixsW39M77alZPIXU4obFT/ROJ2oWTyG1uGHxq7zTVZrFU0gtblj8 Ie/0kGbxFFKLGxZ/1zu9q1k8hdTihsU33Knp5FKteAqpxQ2Lb++dttcsnkJqccPih3mnwzSLp5Ba 3LD4Bd7pAs3iKaQWNyx+u3e6XbN4CqnFDYu/5J1e0iyeQmpxw+Lr7Nx0cqlWPIXU4obFx3mncZrF U0gtblh8X++0r2bxFFKLGxY/1Tudqlk8hdTihsWv807XaRZPIbW4YfHfeaffaRZPIbW4YfEPvNMH msVTSC1uWHyT2U0nl2rFU0gtblh8Z++0s2bxFFKLGxY/yjsdpVk8hdTihsUv9k4XaxZPIbW4YfFf eqdfahZPIbW4YfFXvdOrmsVTSC1uWLzbnKaTS7XiKaQWNyw+yTtN0iyeQmpxw+IHeKcDNIunkFrc sPjXvNPXNIunkFrcsPiPvdOPNYunkFrcsPhT3ukpzeIppBY3LL7a3KaTS7XiKaQWNyw+1DsN1Sye Qmpxw+K7eqddNYunkFrcsPix3ulYzeIppBY3LP497/Q9zeIppBY3LH6fd7pPs3gKqcUNi7/pnd7U LJ5CanHD4r12aTq5VCueQmpxw+LbeqdtNYunkFrcsPhB3ukgzeIppBY3LH6OdzpHs3gKqcUNi9/s nW7WLJ5CanHD4s95p+c0i6eQWtyw+Jq7Np1cqhVPIbW4YfEtvNMWmsVTSC1uWHxP77SnZvEUUosb Fj/RO52oWTyF1OKGxa/yTldpFk8htbhh8d96p99qFk8htbhh8X3aNV0e0iyeQkoofs/qTRe6qRRP IbW4cfER45pOLtWKt0JqcePidwxtOrlUK94KqcWNi88b0HRyqVa8FVKLGxf/Q4+m0x96KBZvhdTi xsUXrdV0cqlWvBVSixsX77hq08mlWvFWSC1uWJy/blAtnkL+74v/A+hfW//kM/iTLsjZuHx5nUbj WfxS+NYp8UecOgPkf/gRDnhbBG43a6ed/vGzdlmb7EVtfxze9sd2jd/jWXbBT/9ku5gdOzfa7kx3 bzRObDRmzDj11A9/9v689Qo+AR/98RM/9K14aRyGz+mI/7Gaa94b0TVp/hELa6rj+7siH7Owz7R9 v/3b/uj++3DUIZ461As6/9vltX3kQ8vb/n8E/+QW+Qntqz1++JFux+1jHtq10XZntt3z70uulmVf xBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WsEfvgl6zYaQ9rHvAD/keDuTHc32JdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29ce+OEX dms05raPeW73Rtud6e4G+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+/oSfvhn4XRM+5if7tlouzPd3WBfcrUs +yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25f38cPX2/9RuM77WOuvUGj7c50d4N9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9Pej+ gxui97aPeUGvRtud6e4G+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+3rH/UIXz+aN9jFX79NouzPd3WBfcrUs +yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25ffSH4LxDtuUbMT0HC3ZnubrAvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evGRC7CNCt 14h5Xr9G253p7gb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7+hzE7oDoZ9aIecuGjbY7090N9iVXy7Iv4oin DvWCjsa+pPDi9nU+xB6F6NlrxHywf6PtznR3g33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH3dBrHHIHrTGjEf GtBouzPd3WBfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fL0LsVxB9do2Ydw1stN2Z7m6wL7laln0RRzx1qBd0 NPYlhRe3r7Ug+EOItl8z5g82arTdme5usC+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt68xEPtXiI5YM+aXNm60 3ZnubrAvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evfSA2B6J7rBlz1iaNtjvT3Q32JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k 8OL2dQrEukD0hDVjdhzUaLsz3d1gX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX9dC7B6IXblmzDsg7u7Me2z2 JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29SjEvgDRB9eM+bnBjbY7090N9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9vU+ xHpC9J01Y3Yd0mi7M93dYF9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl8bQXAxxPp2iHkdxN2dudhmX3K1LPsi jnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXztAbCZEp3eIOXXTRtud6e4G+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+zoSYo9B7NAO MR+CuLszH7PZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb17cgti9Ez+8Qc8/NGm13prsb7EuulmVfxBFPHeoF HY19SeHF7esuiP0eYrd1iPkkxN2d+XubfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fb0CsfkQfbFDzN3xCXV3 prsb7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WtdCD4CsbU6xnwA4u7OfMRmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9u XxMhNg2iozvGnDys0XZnurvBvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvvaH2A0Qm98x5jUQd3fmDTb7kqtl 2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7OgNiG0D0lI4x18MH3Z3p7gb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7+hHEToDY tR1jLsIH3Z15gs2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+noTYsxB7tGPMJ/BBd2c+a7MvuVqWfRFHPHWo F3Q09iWFF7evBgS3wp8sbcmx7gm3pLsb7EuulmVfAefxS1uS962an9ZPfl9SeHH7GgKx8/EnAzvF PBvi7s4832ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fcyH2J/zJDp1i/gHi7s78k82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR 2JcUXty+joHYFIge2SnmhM0bbXemuxvsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6zv+L7jf6hTzdIi7O/Ns m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH3dC7GnIXZnp5iPQdzdmU/b7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7esN iA2G6JJOMQds0Wi7M93dYF9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl89IXgYxLquFfMgiLs78zCbfcnVsuyL OOKpQ72go7EvKby4fW0NsRshNnGtmNdD3N2ZN9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6zMQew9i+68V 8y2IuzvzPZt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9fR1iW0L0jLVijhnZaLsz3d1gX3K1LPsijnjqUC/o aOxLCi9uXzdB7FiI3bBWzC9C3N2Zx9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt61mI/RRiT6wV8z8g7u7M n9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXtq73/D/LG2jFfg7i7M9+y2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29cI iA2H6JC1Yw4e1Wi7M93dYF9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl97QGwhxOauHXMBxN2dudBmX3K1LPsi jnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXydA7GKILVo75jch7u7Mi232JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dSXEHobYZWvH vB/i7s582GZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fD0KsHUTvXTvmcqS7M93dYF9ytSz7Io546lAv6Gjs Swovbl/vQGw8xN5YO+bI0Y22O3O8zb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L76QvCzEOu5TsxPQ9zdmZ+1 2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29cMiF0Asa3XiXkOxN2deYHNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvg6F 2N0QW7hOzNsh7u7Mu232JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dT7E3oTY2evEfBXi7s5802ZfcrUs+yKO eOpQL+ho7EsKL25ft0GsH0RvWifm+mMabXemuxvsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt60WIzYLYs+vE nAZxd2fOstmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXWhA8EmLtO8c8FOLuzjzSZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6Gjs Swovbl+jIfZtiA3vHPMbEHd35rdt9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9jUfYndBbPfOMW+DuLsz77LZ l1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1ykQWwKxEzrHfAHi7s5cYrMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evayHW GaJXdo7ZYWyj7c50d4N9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9PQqx0RB7sHPM4RB3d+Zom33J1bLsizji qUO9oKOxLym8uH0thdinIPZ255i7QNzdmZ+y2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29dACB4LsT5dYn4R 4u7OPNZmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXztA7BKITe8S8wKIuzvzEpt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8p vLh9HQmxn0Ps0C4xfwpxd2f+3GZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25f34LY7yF2fpeYT0Lc3Zm/t9mX XC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXXRBbDrHbusR8D+Luzlxusy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt68lEOsH 0Re6xFx/XKPtznR3g33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH11heBkiHXqGnM8xN2dOdlmX3K1LPsijnjq UC/oaOxLCi9uXxMhNh9io7vG3B3i7s6cb7MvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev/SF2DMTmd415JMTd nXmMzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L7OgNg3IHZK15hfh7i7M79hsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUX t68bIPYjiF3TNea1EHd35o9s9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9vUExB6A2CNdY94DcXdnPmCzL7la ln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3LzyTxksQW9qSz41re1YhX7LZl1wty74CzuOXtiTvL2ntSwovbl9DILYq RAeuG/PvSHdnurvBvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvuZCrA/Edlg3Zo/xjbY7s4/NvuRqWfZFHPHU oV7Q0diXFF7cvo6B2FiIHbluzM0h7u7MsTb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7ugxisyF20boxZ0Lc 3ZmzbfYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vZ1L8QWQuzOdWMugLi7Mxfa7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF 7esNiH0JYkvWjXkMxN2d+SWbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4ffWE4Dch1nW9mP8GcXdnftNmX3K1 LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX1tD7IcQm7hezB9A3N2ZP7TZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb10KI/QJi C9aL+TOIuzvzFzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7OhtiT0Ls9PViPgpxd2c+abMvuVqWfRFHPHWo F3Q09iWFF7evmyD2BsRuWC/mEoi7O/MNm33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH09C7F2EH1ivZjLke7O dHeDfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fbWHYC/3WekWs9uERtud2ctmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9u XyMgNgJiQ7rFHAJxd2eOsNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vX7hCbCrE53WJOgri7M6fa7EuulmVf xBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7esEiO0BsUXdYs6FuLsz97DZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb15UQOxhil3WL eQDE3Z15sM2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+HoTYCRC7t1vMRRB3d+YJNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdj X1J4cft6x/+NrDe6xfwqxN2d+W82+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx++oDwcsh1qN7zEsg7u7My232 JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2NR1iN0JsSveY10Pc3Zk32uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rUIjd C7GF3WPeCXF3Z95rsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt6/zIfYExM7uHvMRiLs78wmbfcnVsuyLOOKp Q72go7EvKby4fd0GsVcgdlP3mC9C3N2Zr9jsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6wWIvQ+xZ7rHfAfi 7s5832ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fnSC4FkTb9YjZfmKj7c50d4N9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8p vLh9jYZYH4gN7xGzB8TdndnHZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl/zITbM/c3iHjEHQdzdmcNs9iVX y7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9nVK9+bfiD+hR8xxEHd35iSbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fV0LsZ3c 3yzuEXM7iLs7cyebfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fT0CsX0g9kCPmHtA3N2Z+9jsS66WZV/EEU8d 6gUdjX1J4cXtaynEDoHY2z1iHghxd2ceYrMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evgfA5FmJ9esb8IsTd nXmszb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L52gM8ZEJveM+YpEHd35hk2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx +zoSPhdC7NCeMc+FuLszL7TZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb10Xw+T7EzusZ8zsQd3fm9232JVfL si/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dSd8FkPs1p4xr4O4uzMX2+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe1rCXzugtgL PWPeBnF3Z95lsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt6+uEHwIYp3Wj3kfxN2d+ZDNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q 0diXFF7cviZC7BmIjV4/5uMQd3fmMzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH72h9if4LY/PVj/gHi7s78 k82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+TofYuxA7ef2Yb0Lc3Znv2uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3r Boi1g+g168dcjnR3prsb7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7esJiK3r/mbx+jHX2rLRdmeua7MvuVqW fRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evBgT7QWxpS64P8UZL9rPZl1wty74CzuOXtiTv/bT2JYUXt68hEBsKsYEb xNwE4u7OHGqzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3rzkQGw+xWRvEHAlxd2eOt9mXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa +5LCi9vXIohNg9gRG8ScDHF3Z06z2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29dlEJsDsYs2iDkL4u7OnGOz L7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r3shNh9id24Qc3eIuztzvs2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+3oDY Qogt2SDmAoi7O3Ohzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L56QPBIiHXpFfNQiLs780ibfcnVsuyLOOKp Q72go7EvKby4fU2B2AkQm9Ar5iKIuzvzBJt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9LYTY6RBb0CvmyRB3 d+bpNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cfs6G2LnQez0XjHPgri7M8+z2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL 29dNELsUYjf0inkhxN2deanNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvp6F2NUQe6JXzMsh7u7Mq232JVfL si/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL21Q6CiyG2vCWvg3i7llxssy+5WpZ9EUf88pbkfbHWvqTw4vY1HGI/h9jg 3jF/CnF3Z/7cZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl+7Q+xXEJvTO+ZdEHd35q9s9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWC jsa+pPDi9nUCxB6F2KLeMR+EuLszH7XZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb15UQewZil/WO+TjE3Z35 jM2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+HoDYSxC7p3fM5yDu7syXbPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vb1 NsT+DLHXe8d8BeLuzvyzzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L76QHApxHr0ifk2xN2dudRmX3K1LPsi jnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX9MhtjpEp/SJuQzp7kx3N9iXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXoRBbG2IL+8Rc Y6tG2525ts2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+zodYT4id3SdmV4i7O7Onzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHY lxRe3L5uhVh/iN3YJ2YviLs7s7/NvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvl6A2KYQe6ZPzI0g7u7MTW32 JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL21QmCoyDWrm/MYRB3d+Yom33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH2NhthW EBveN+ZYiLs7cyubfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fc2H2HSI7d435hSIuztzus2+5GpZ9kUc8dSh XtDR2JcUXty+TobYThA7vm/M7SDu7sydbPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vZ1TZ/m/1Dzir4x50Dc 3Zm72+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rEYjtC7EH+sbcE+LuztzXZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwov bl9LIbYQYm/3jbkA4u7OXGizL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r4EAfh5iffrF/CzE3Z35eZt9ydWy 7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9zerb/B8CT+sX8wiIuztzkc2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+jgDwyxA7 pF/M/wNxd2d+2WZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fFwF4GsTO6xfzJIi7O/M0m33J1bLsizjiqUO9 oKOxLym8uH3dCeDXIXZrv5hnQNzdmV+32ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29cSAC+A2Av9Yp4DcXdn XmCzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r64QvBRinTaMeSHE3Z15qc2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+ JkDs+xAbtWHM70Dc3Znft9mXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXgn7Nf5DB3hvGvAri7s68zmZfcrUs +yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fp0PsRoidvGHM6yHu7swbbfYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vZ1A8R+BrFr Noz5E4i7O/NnNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cft6AmK/hNgjG8b8OcTdnflLm33J1bLsizjiqUO9 oKOxLym8uH0th9j9EHtvw5h3Q9zdmffb7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WswBB+B2ID+MR+AuLsz H7HZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1xyI/RfEZvWP+Z8Qd3fmf9nsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt a9GGzX8QyxH9Yz4FcXdnPmezL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r8sg9jLELuof83mIuzvzZZt9ydWy 7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh93QuxNyB2Z/+YSyDu7sw3bPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vb1OsTegdjL /WO+AXF3Z75jsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt68eEPw7xLoMiPlXiLs78+82+5KrZdkXccRTh3pB R2NfUnhx+5oCsdXc3yweEPMDpLsz3d1gX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXwsh1tH9zeIBMVef1Gi7 Mzva7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7etsiHWB2OkDYnaEuLszu9jsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt 60aI9YTY9QNidoW4uzN72uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rGYj1hdjjA2L2hLi7M/va7EuulmVf xBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7avdgOY/qGx5S/aFeLuW3MhmX3K1LPsijvjlLcn7Rlr7ksKL29dwiG0GscED Y24McXdnbmazL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r90htgXE5gyMuRnE3Z25hc2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR 2JcUXty+ToDYOIgtGhhzC4i7O3Oczb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6ugNgkiF06MOY4iLs7c5LN vuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvh6A2FSI3TMw5iSIuztzqs2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+3obY TIi9PjDmVIi7O3Omzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L76QHA2xHpsFHMmxN2dOdtmX3K1LPsijnjq UC/oaOxLCi9uX9MhthvEpmwUczbE3Z25m82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+DoHY3hA7cKOYu0Hc 3Zl72+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rvIHNf5DnWRvF3Bvi7s5cYLMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWF F7evWyG2EGI3bhRzAcTdnbnQZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl8vQOwQiD2zUcwDIe7uzENs9iVX y7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9tVpo+Y/KLbdxjEPgbi7M4+w2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29coiB0N sWEbxzwc4u7OPNpmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX3tD7HiI7bZxzKMh7u7M4232JVfLsi/iiKcO 9YKOxr6k8OL2dfJGzX8Q8fEbxzwO4u7OPMlmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX9dA7DSIXbFxzJMg 7u7M02z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29QjEzoTYAxvHPBXi7s4802ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsK L25fSyF2LsTe3jjmmRB3d+a5NvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cfsaAMELINZ7k5jnQNzdmRfY7Euu lmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WsWxC6G2LRNYn4T4u7OvNhmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX0dA7LsQ O2STmN+GuLszv2uzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r4sg9n2InbdJzO9A3N2Z37fZl1wty76II546 1As6GvuSwovb150QuxZit24S80qIuzvzWpt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9vQyxGyD2/CYxr4G4 uzNvsNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9tXFwjeCLGOg2JeD3F3Z95osy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUX t68JELsFYqMGxVwMcXdn3mKzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3rwUQux1iew+KeTPE3Z15u82+5GpZ 9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+TofYLyF28qCYP4e4uzN/abMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evGyD2a4hd MyjmLyDu7sxf2+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rcYj9BmIPD4r5K4i7O/M3NvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6 QUdjX1J4cftaDrFHIfbeoJgPQtzdmY/a7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WswBB+H2IDBMR+GuLsz H7fZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1xyIPQ2xWYNjPgZxd2c+bbMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev RRB7DmJHDI75FMTdnfmczb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4uhdgfIHbh4Ji/h7i7M/9gsy+5WpZ9 EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt697IPYKxO4YHPNFiLs78xWbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fb0Osdch9vLg mC9D3N2Zr9vsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXtqwcE34JYlyExX4O4uzPfstmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa +5LCi9vXFIj9DWIThsT8C8Tdnfk3m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH0dCLH3IbbfkJjvQNzdme/b 7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7essiDUgetqQmEuR7s50d4N9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh93Ti4 +S96u35IzGVId2eubrMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evZyC2JsQeHxJz1cmNtjtzTZt9ydWy7Is4 4qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9tYPg2hBb3pJrQLxdS65tsy+5WpZ9EUf88pbkfW2tfUnhxe1r+JDmv0hw8KYx O0Hc3ZldbfYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4va1G8S6Q2z2pjE7Q9zdmd1t9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+ pPDi9nU8xDaA2NGbxlwP4u7O3MBmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX1cMaf6LKi/dNGZPiLs7s6/N vuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvh6A2ACI3bNpzN4Qd3fmAJt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9vQ2x TSD2+qYxN4S4uzM3sdmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9tX702b/yLU7pvF3Bji7s7czGZfcrUs+yKO eOpQL+ho7EsKL25f0yA2HGKTN4s5GOLuzhxusy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt69DIDYSYgduFnMo xN2dOdJmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX+dBbCzEztos5uYQd3fmWJt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8p vLh93QqxiRC7cbOYoyHu7syJNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cft6AWKTIfbMZjHHQ9zdmZNt9iVX y7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9tURgttCbPWhMbeCuLszt7XZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1yiIzYDY sKExt4a4uzNn2OxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe1rb4jNgthuQ2NOg7i7M2fZ7EuulmVfxBFPHeoF HY19SeHF7etkiO0EseOHxtwO4u7O3MlmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX9dAbC7ErhgacweIuztz rs2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+Ht6s+S+iv39ozNkQd3fmbjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7 eg9in4LYW0Nj7gJxd2d+ymZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fAyA4H2K9h8XcHeLuzpxvsy+5WpZ9 EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt69ZENsPYtOGxdwL4u7O3M9mX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX0dA7NMQO2RY zH0g7u7MT9vsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6yKILYTYecNiLoC4uzMX2uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2N fUnhxe3rDogdBLFbhsX8fyDu7syDbPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vb1MsQ+B7Hnh8X8DMTdnfk5 m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH11geDhEOs4PObBEHd35uE2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+5oA sS9CbNTwmJ+HuLszv2izL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3rwUQWwSxvYfHPALi7s5cZLMvuVqWfRFH PHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev0yB2HMROGh7zKIi7O/M4m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH1dD7EvQezq4TGP gbi7M79ksy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt6/HIXYSxB4eHvM4iLs78ySbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7Ev Kby4fS2H2Fcg9t7wmF+GuLszv2KzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r8H4xukQGzAi5skQd3fm6Tb7 kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7mo1vfA1iM0fE/ArE3Z35NZt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9HY1v nA2xw0fEPB3i7s4822ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fl+Ib50LswhExz4S4uzPPtdmXXC3Lvogj njrUCzoa+5LCi9vXPfjGNyB2x4iYX4e4uzO/YbMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev1/GNCyH28oiY 50Lc3ZkX2uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe2rBwS/DbEum8f8BsTdnfltm33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOx Lym8uH1NhtilEBu/ecwLIe7uzEtt9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9nUgxL4Hsf02j3kxxN2d+T2b fcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fZ0FsSshdtrmMS+DuLszr7TZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb140Q uwpi128e83sQd3fmVTb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7egZi10Ls8c1jXglxd2dea7MvuVqWfRFH PHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev1SF4HcSWteRVEF+9Ja+z2ZdcLcu+iCN+WUvyfp3WvqTw4vY1DGI/gtigLWJe C3F3Z/7IZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl+7QWwxxGZvEfM6iLs7c7HNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diX FF7cvo6H2E8gdvQWMX8EcXdn/sRmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX1dA7BaIXbpFzMUQd3fmLTb7 kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7egBiP4PYPVvE/AnE3Z35M5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9vQWx OyD22hYxb4G4uzPvsNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9tXbwjeBbHuI2PeBnF3Z95lsy+5WpZ9EUc8 dagXdDT2JYUXt69pELsbYpNHxrwd4u7OvNtmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX4dA7FcQO3BkzLsg 7u7MX9nsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6zyI3Q+xs0bGvBvi7s6832ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsK L25ft0DsNxBbPDLmryDu7szf2OxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3reYg9DLGnR8a8H+LuznzYZl9y tSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl8dIfgoxFYfFfNBiLs781GbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fY2C2GMQ GzYq5kMQd3fmYzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH72htiT0Jst1ExH4W4uzOftNmXXC3LvogjnjrU Czoa+5LCi9vXSRB7GmLHjYr5GMTdnfm0zb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6uhtizELt8VMwnIO7u zGdt9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9vUwxJ6D2P2jYj4FcXdnPmezL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3 r/cg9iLE3hoV81mIuzvzRZt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9DYDgHyHWe3TM/4a4uzP/aLMvuVqW fRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evWRBbArFpo2O+AHF3Zy6x2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29fhEHsVYgeP jvlHiLs781WbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fV0Isdchdu7omC9D3N2Zr9vsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUd jX1J4cXt6w6I/QVit4yO+SeIuzvzLzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7ehlib0Hs+dExX4O4uzPf stmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9tXFwj+FWIdx8T8M8TdnflXm33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH2N h9h7EBs5JuZbEHd35ns2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+9oPYu9DbK8xMd+BuLsz37fZl1wty76I I5461As6GvuSwovb12kQWwaxk8bEfBfi7s5cZrMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev6yHWcH+zeEzM pUh3Z7q7wb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4eh9hq7m8Wj4n5AdLdmavZ7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19 SeHF7Ws5xNpB7L0xMZcj3Z3ZzmZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fgyC4BsT6j425ypRG2525hs2+ 5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+ZkOsI8Rmjo25OsTdndnRZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl9HQ2wt iB0+NmZ7iLs7cy2bfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fV0Ksc4Qu3BszA4Qd3dmZ5t9ydWy7Is44qlD vaCjsS8pvLh93QOxrhC7Y2zMThB3d2ZXm33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH29BrFuEHtpbMx1IO7u zG42+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx++oOwR4Q6zwuZheIuzuzh82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+ JkNsfYiNHxdzXYi7O3N9m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH0dCLHeENtvXMzuEHd3Zm+bfcnVsuyL OOKpQ72go7EvKby4fZ0Fsb4QO21czJ4Qd3dmX5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9LYbYhhC7blzM DSDu7swNbfYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vb1NMQGQOyxcTF7Q9zdmQNs9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+ pPDi9rU6BDeG2LKW7Afx1VtyY5t9ydWy7Is44pe1JO8ba+1LCi9uX8MgNghig8bH7A9xd2cOstmX XC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXbhAbArHZ42MOhLi7M4fY7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7et4iG0G saPHx9wY4u7O3MxmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX5dDbDjELhkfczDE3Z053GZfcrUs+yKOeOpQ L+ho7EsKL25f90Nsc4jdPT7mphB3d+bmNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cft6C2IjIfba+JhDIe7u zJE2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx++oNwdEQ6z4h5nCIuztztM2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+ pkFsLMQmT4i5OcTdnTnWZl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl8HQ2wCxA6YEHMUxN2dOcFmX3K1LPsi jnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX+dCbEuInTkh5hiIuztzS5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh93QKxSRBbPCHm OIi7O3OSzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6eh9gUiD09IeYEiLs7c4rNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diX FF7cvjpCcBuIrT4x5pYQd3fmNjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7GgWxqRAbNjHmJIi7O3Oqzb7k aln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L72gth0iM2bGHMKxN2dOd1mX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXydBbDuI HTcx5jYQd3fmdjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7uhpiMyF2+cSYUyHu7syZNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6 QUdjX1J4cft6GGI7Quz+iTFnQNzdmTva7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7es9iO0Msbcmxtwe4u7O 3NlmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX/0hOAdivbaMOQvi7s6cY7MvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev mRDbBWJTt4y5I8TdnbmLzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4Oh9g8iB28ZcydIe7uzHk2+5KrZdkX ccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+7oQYrtD7NwtY86BuLszd7fZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1x0Q+xTEbtky 5i4Qd3fmp2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29TLE9oLY81vGnAdxd2fuZbMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q0 9iWFF7evzhCcD7EOW8XcHeLuzpxvsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt6/xENsHYiO3irkHxN2duY/N vuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvvaD2L4Q22urmHtC3N2Z+9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt6zSI LYDYSVvF3Bvi7s5cYLMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7ev6yH2aYhdvVXMfSDu7sxP2+xLrpZlX8QR Tx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rMYgdALGHtoq5L8TdnXmAzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6WQWwhxN7dKuYC iLs7c6HNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvgZB8LMQ6z8p5qch7u7Mz9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J 4cXtazbEDobYzEkxD4C4uzMPttmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vX0RA7FGKHT4q5EOLuzjzUZl9y tSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl+XQOzzELtgUszPQtzdmZ+32ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7ksKL29fdEDsM YrdPinkQxN2deZjNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvl6D2BEQe2lSzEMg7u7MI2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO 9YKOxr6k8OL21R2CX5jc/JcHMj8HcXdnfsFmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX5MhdhTExk+OeRjE 3Z15lM2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+DoTYIojtNznmERB3d+Yim33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8 uH2dCbFjIHbq5JhHQtzdmcfY7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7WsxxI6F2HWTY34R4u7OPNZmX3K1 LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX09D7HiIPTY55tEQd3fm8Tb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7Wh1SX8Lv y1ryGIiv3pJfstmXXC3LvogjfllL8v4lrX1J4cXtaxikTsTvg6bEPBa/uzvzRJt9ydWy7Is44qlD vaCjsS8pvLh9uf9R5kmTm/9jTeZxU5r/Y03mSTb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7Og5Sp+D3o6bE PMHJT455is2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+LofUV/D7JVNifhm/uzvzKzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFH Y19SeHH7uh9Sp+H3u6fEPAm/uzvzNJt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9vQWp0/H7a1Ninozf3Z15 us2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+3L8k/KsQ6751zH+d0vyXhzO/arMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWF F7cv9w/xPBNik7aOeeqU5j/ck3mmzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4OhthZEDtg65in4ebuzLNs 9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9nUuxL4OsTO3jnkGbu7O/LrNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvm6B 2DkQW7x1zK/h5u7Mc2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29bz7CwHEnt465pm4uTvzXJt9ydWy7Is4 4qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9dYDg+RBbbZuYZ0PW3Znn2+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe1rJMS+CbGh28T8 N4i7O/ObNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cfvaC2IXQGzeNjHPgbi7My+w2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7 ksKL29dJELsIYsdtE/M8iLs78yKbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fV0NsW9D7PJtYn4D4u7O/LbN vuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvh6C2MUQu2+bmN+EuLszL7bZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb17sQ uxRib24T80KIuzvzUpt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh99YfgZRDrtW3MiyDu7szLbPYlV8uyL+KI pw71go7GvqTw4vY1E2LfhdjUbWN+G+Luzvyuzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4O36b5//x48LYx 3f9TpLszL7fZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb14UQuwJi524b81KIuzvzCpt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCj sS8pvLh93Q6x70Ps5m1jfgfi7s78vs2+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+XoLYDyD23LYxvwtxd2f+ wGZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25fnSF4NcQ6TI15OcTdnXm1zb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L7G Q+waiI2cGvMKiLs78xqbfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fe0HsX+H2F5TY34f4u7O/HebfcnVsuyL OOKpQ72go7EvKby4fZ0KsR9C7MSpMX8AcXdn/tBmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uX9dB7HqIXTU1 5tUQd3fm9Tb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7egxiN0Dsoakxr4G4uzNvsNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa +5LCi9vXMoj9B8TenRrz3yHu7sz/sNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXIAj+GGL9p8X8IcTdnflj m33J1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH3NhtiNEJs5Leb1EHd35o02+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+zoK YjdB7LBpMW+AuLszb7LZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovb1yUQ+ynELpgW8z8g7u7Mn9rsS66WZV/E EU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt626I3Qyx26fF/DHE3Z15s82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+XoPYrRB7aVrM GyHu7sxbbfYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vbVHYK3Qazz9Jg3QdzdmbfZ7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19 SeHF7WsSxH4OsXHTY/4U4u7O/LnNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvg6A2O0Q23d6zJsh7u7M2232 JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dSbE7oTYqdNj3gpxd2feabMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evxRC7 C2LXTY95G8TdnXmXzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6ehtgvIPbY9Jg/g7i7M39hsy+5WpZ9EUc8 dagXdDT2JYUXt6/V8BPfDbEPWvJ2iK/Wknfb7EuulmVfxBH/QUvyfrfWvqTw4vY1FD/xPRDbZEbM OyDu7sx7bPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vY1Dz/xryC284yYd0Hc3Zm/stmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa +5LCi9vXcfiJfw2xo2bE/AXE3Z35a5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9XY6f+D6IXTIj5i8h7u7M +2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dT9+4gcgdveMmPdA3N2ZD9jsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt 6038xA9C7NUZMe+FuLszH7TZl1wty76II5461As6GvuSwovbVy/8NL+FWLftYv4a4u7O/K3NvuRq WfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvqbip3kIYpO2i3kfxN2d+ZDNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvg7GT/Mw xA7YLub9EHd35sM2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+zoXP82jEDtzu5gPQtzdmY/a7EuulmVfxBFP HeoFHY19SeHF7etm/DT/CbEfbxfzNxB3d+Z/2uxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe3rOfw0v4PYU9vF /C3E3Z35O5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9dYDg4xBbbfuYD0Pc3ZmP2+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2N fUnhxe1rJMSegNjQ7WM+AnF3Zz5hsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt6+9IPYkxOZtH/NRiLs780mb fcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fZ0Esacgdtz2MX8HcXdnPmWzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r6sg 9jTEvrd9zMcg7u7Mp232JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29RDEnoHYfdvHfBzi7s58xmZfcrUs+yKO eOpQL+ho7EsKL25f70Ls9xB7c/uYT0Lc3Zm/t9mXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9tXfwj+N8R6zYz5 XxB3d+Z/2+xLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe1rJsSeg9jUmTGfgri7M5+z2ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQLOhr7 ksKL29dhEHseYgfNjPk0xN2d+bzNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvi6A2IsQO2dmzGch7u7MF232 JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dTvE/gCxm2fG/D3E3Z35B5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9vQSx P0LsuZkx/xvi7s78o82+5GpZ9kUc8dShXtDR2JcUXty+OkPwJYh1mBXzOYi7O/Mlm33J1bLsizji qUO9oKOxLym8uH2Nh9gSiI2cFfMFiLs7c4nNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvvaF2CsQ23NWzBch 7u7MV2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL2dSrE/gSxE2fF/APE3Z35J5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8p vLh9XQexVyF21ayYf4S4uzNftdmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXYxB7HWIPzYr5MsTdnfm6zb7k aln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L6WQewNiL07K+YSiLs78w2bfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fW0CwT9D bMMdYr4CcXdn/tlmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXztD7C8Q236HmH+CuLsz/2KzL7laln0RRzx1 qBd0NPYlhRe3r6Mg9hbEDtsh5msQd3fmWzb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7ugRib0Psgh1ivg5x d2e+bbMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evuyH2DsRu3yHmGxB3d+Y7NvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4 cft6FWJ/hdgfd4j5Z4i7O/OvNvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cfvqBsG/QWydHWP+BeLuzvybzb7k aln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4mQew9iI3bMeZbEHd35ns2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+zoAYksh tu+OMd+GuLszl9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt60yIvQ+xU3eM+Q7E3Z35vs2+5GpZ9kUc8dSh XtDR2JcUXty+FkPs7xC7bseYf4W4uzP/brMvuVqWfRFHPHWoF3Q09iWFF7evpyD2AcR+t2PMv0Hc 3Zkf2OxLrpZlX8QRTx3qBR2NfUnhxe1rNQgug9gHLfkuxFdryWU2+5KrZdkXccR/0JK8L9PalxRe 3L6GQqzh/mbxTjGXIt2d6e4G+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+5oHsVXc3yzeKeb7SHdnrmKzL7la ln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r+Mgtqr7m8U7xfw70t2Zq9rsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUdjX1J4cXt63sQWw1i F+8U8wOkuzNXs9mXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXfRBbHWK/3CnmMqS7M1e32ZdcLcu+iCOeOtQL Ohr7ksKL29ebEGsHsVd3irkc6e7Mdjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH76gXB9hDrtnPMBgbh7sz2 NvuSq2XZF3HEU4d6QUdjX1J4cfuaCrE1IDZp55irQNzdmWvY7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7etg iHWA2AE7x1wN4u7O7GCzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r3Mg1hFiX9s55uoQd3dmR5t9ydWy7Is4 4qlDvaCjsS8pvLh93QyxThD78c4x20Hc3ZmdbPYlV8uyL+KIpw71go7GvqTw4vb1HMTWgthTO8ds D3F3Z65lsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt68OEFwbYqvNjrkGxN2dubbNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diX FF7cvkZCbB2IDZ0dc02IuztzHZt9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh97QmxzhDbdXbMDhB3d2Znm33J 1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH2dCLEuEDt2dsyOEHd3ZhebfcnVsuyLOOKpQ72go7EvKby4fV0Fsa4Q +97smJ0g7u7Mrjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19SeHH7eghi60Lsvtkx14K4uzPXtdmXXC3LvogjnjrU Czoa+5LCi9vXuxBbD2Jvzo65NsTdnbmezb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L42xEe6Q2yDOTE7Q9zd md1t9iVXy7Iv4oinDvWCjsa+pPDi9rU9PtIDYtvOidkF4u7O7GGzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3 r8PwkZ4QO2hOzK4Qd3dmT5t9ydWy7Is44qlDvaCjsS8pvLh9XYCPrA+xc+bEXBfi7s5c32ZfcrUs +yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25ft+MjG0Ds5jkx14O4uzM3sNmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXS/hIL4g9 NydmN4i7O7OXzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L7WgWBviK05N2Z3iLs7s7fNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q 0diXFF7cvsZBrA/EtpgbswfE3Z3Zx2ZfcrUs+yKOeOpQL+ho7EsKL25f+0KsL8T2nBuzJ8TdndnX Zl9ytSz7Io546lAv6GjsSwovbl+nQqwfxE6cG3N9iLs7s5/NvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7cvq6D 2IYQu2puzA0g7u7MDW32JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29TuI9YfYb+fG7AVxd2f2t9mXXC3Lvogj njrUCzoa+5LCi9vXBxAbALG/zY3ZG+Luzhxgsy+5WpZ9EUc8dagXdDT2JYUXt69NIDgQYhvuErMP xN2dOdBmX3K1LPsijnjqUC/oaOxLCi9uXztDbCOIbb9LzL4Qd3fmRjb7kqtl2RdxxFOHekFHY19S eHH7OgpiG0PssF1i9oO4uzM3ttmXXC3LvogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXJRDbBGIX7BJzQ4i7O3MTm33J 1bLsizjiqUO9oKOxLym8uH39EmKDIPbzXWL2h7i7MwfZ7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7etViA2G 2B93iTkA4u7OHGyzL7laln0RRzx1qBd0NPYlhRe3r24QHAKxdXaNORDi7s4cYrMvuVqWfRFHPHWo F3Q09iWFF7evSRDbFGLjdo25EcTdnbmpzb7kaln2RRzx1KFe0NHYlxRe3L4OgNhmENt315gbQ9zd mZvZ7EuulmVfxBFPHeoFHY19SeHF7etrEBsKsa/sGnMTiLs7c6jNvuRqWfZFHPHUoV7Q0diXFF7c vn4MsWEQ++GuMQdB3N2Zw2z2JVfLsi/iiKcO9YKOxr6k8OL29RTEhkPsd7vGHAxxd2cOt9mXXC3L vogjnjrUCzoa+5LCi9vXahAcAbEPWnIIxFdryRE2+5KrZdkXccR/0JK8j9DalxRe3L6GQmxziG0y L+amEHd35uY2+5KrZdkXccRTh3pBR2NfUnhx+5oHsS0gtvO8mJtB3N2ZW9jsS66WZV/EEU8d6gUd jX1J4Z/cvj6khk/JKo0uyJ+tjv9cnoq/duIj3aY3f9r+iB6NPXebsedu+83ddtbs3ebN3HbujPjp dL99FT9+W+Rqja3wx86NnQ769IFH7v/Fgw77fP95+3/+C83v1Avuy5c32kp/6Lflq7XF6f5Tu0rj NO+3HL/hia7SgFpj7MQtG0fgOwzCt3+Ow7PTGm3ffVRjCyfb9m33KkxZxf1Z2xUN1sOlg28wY860 1s9Z8qFVVvihnVb8o+a2fqgfotuHP1v/o6cwo1PzKXxlrfKfwnad4lMYh8/4h59C2/Wf8Cl8qWvz KeyzXtlPwf019ctdm0/B/cCRWP2YNv5qLc/h6VXcxX/sE3oa01Zd4YdyPqhHcfkmPuPrrdF8YKU+ KPe6/Cc+etlU/kVrfOOj/qI1/p/ydXmlffOzv9maZb8u7in8qX38i9botpclfQqjP8HXJOdTWGXN 5ruwbYfy34VV14zvwhj8penDT6Ht+k/4FHr6z/6nOpb/LqzfIb4LYxoTPvIpTPinfAojOjbfhc93 Kv9d2LxjfBfG4v8+/BTarv+ET2H+Ws2n8O21y38K+6wVn8K4xsSPeApt13/Cp3Ck/+z/xzrl/xXp C2vHvyKNx2f8w0+h7fpP+BTOWKf5Lvy6c/nvwlfXie/CBPz3oQ8/hbbrP+FT+I7/7P93l/Lfhe92 ju/CxI/8IsfEf9IvctzUpfku/LVr+e/CT7rEd2HiR/6qbeI/6a/avrFu8yl8oVvZT8F9keOb6zaf QvOLHCPbfsXw0V/kGPkJ/rqhkC9yXLte8wGd0b3sv2i5B/Xv67V+NWpk2y8qVvSgPrlfWhTyoO7q 1nyjvtOj/DfqF91a36hRbb/u+OgHNeoT/NVHIQ/qye7NB/STnuW/Uf/VvfWNGt32dfaPflCjP8Gv thfyoP7co/lG/Wb98t+ov/RofaNGt/0ackUP6pP7lWQhD6q9f0AvblD+G7XG+q1v1Ji2X2Z+9IMa 8wn+YrOQB9V3g+Yb9X6v8t+ofhu0vlFj234l+tEPauwn+OvRQh7UGP+A1u1T/hs1tlfrGzWu7Rer H/2gxn2Cv2Qt5EHt0Lv5Rg3pW/4btWPv1jdqXNuvZ1f0oD65X9UW8qD279N8QFv3K/+N+nSf1jdq /Mf8Xf3xK9/f1T+mb/ON2mPD8t+o/9O39Y2a8DFfmZiw8n1l4ux+zQd0aP/y36iv92t9oyZ8zFcm Jqx8X5m4csPmG3XKgPLfqO9v2PpGTfyYr0xMXPm+MnFb/+YD+tbA8t+on/WPb5T7/7dc0Vcm/MdW rgf16IDmG/Wjjcp/o/5zQHyj3MNY0Vcm/MdWrge1ZGDzAd27cflv1CsDW9+okSv8yoT/2Mr1oBob N9+oZzcp/41aZePWN2rUCr8y4T+2cj2onv4BvTOo/Ddq/U1a36jRK/zKhP/YyvWghg9qvlGdhpT/ Ro0Y1PpGjV7hVyb8x1auBzV9cPMBDdy0/DdqxuDWN2rMCr8y4T+2cj2o+UOab9TEzcp/o/YZ0vpG jV3hVyb8x1auB3Xkps0HNHdo+W/UFzZtfaPGrvArE/5jK9eDOn2z5hu1cFj5b9QZm7W+UeNW+JUJ /7GV60FdNrT5gE4YXv4b9Z2hrW/U+I/5ysT4le8rEzcNa75R548o/436ybDWN2r8x3xlYvzK95WJ B4Y3H9A1m5f/Rj04vPWNmvAxX5mYsPJ9ZeKFEc036s4tyn+jXhzR+kZN/JivTExc+b4ysXTz5gN6 YmT5b9T7m8c3yn3tYUVfmfAfW7keVJeRzTfq9VHlv1FdR8Y3yj2MFX1lwn9s5XpQg/0Dajem/Ddq yKjWN2rkCr8y4T+2cj2oKaObb1SfseW/UVuPbn2jRq3wKxP+YyvXg9p9TPMBjR5X/hu1x5jWN2rU Cr8y4T+2cj2oQ8Y236hZ48t/ow4d2/pGjV7hVyb8x1auB3XyuOYDWjCh/DfqlHGtb9SYFX5lwn9s 5XpQF41vvlGLJpb/Rn1rfOsbNWaFX5nwH1u5HtT1E5oP6Kwty3+jbpjQ+kaNXeFXJvzHVq4Hdc/E 5ht1xVblv1H3Tmx9o8at8CsT/mMr14N6ZsvmA7p1Uvlv1LNbtr5R4z/mKxPjV76vTLy9VfONemRy +W/UO1u1vlHjP+YrE+NXvq9MdPQP6OUp5b9RnSa3vlETPuYrExNWvq9MuH/BtHujlm9d/hvl/mXF 8Y2a+DFfmZi48n1lYoJ/QD22Lf+Nmrh16xs18WO+MjFx5fvKxOz/t7xzCW0iCAPwJDa2oKIi2kMV +lAvrWCS3TxAadPtJk2TNEkbW5FqK6KCj1aE6kGFKlgPVgRFsAe9KIg968EHovUo9KJgDp56UDwo giAKCv6z/2x20jJJAz6GSSCZzf47O49vvu3mhyYdaFRbp/xGpTscozS4XRBlJlhMLVAHIwjIMOQ3 6lDEMUqzvvZDBMqrXmbibCcatadLfqPOdfJGeYWZCRZTC9Q1AwGdMOU36rrBG+UTZiZYTC1Q97vQ qEtR+Y2a6eKN8gszEyymFqjnJgK6HZPfqBcmb5QmzEywmFqg3kbRqIfd8huVj/JGacLMBIupBepT DAG9istv1OcYb5QuzEywmFqgauJo1HyP/EZ54rxRAWFmgsXUAtXAAP1IyG/Uxh7eqIAwM8FiaoHy JtCo1Sn5jfIleKOCJTITQfUyE91JBLS1V36j4kneqFCJzERIvczEcAqN2pmW36iRFG9UqERmIqRe ZuJULwLKZeQ36nQvb1S4RGYirF5mYiqNRh3Jym/UlbRjlA4faUWZCRZTC9SdDAI63ye/UXczjlG6 9Vt7IlBe9TITj7No1M1++Y16kuWN8gozEyymFqhZGOevdkIOwKzsiMgLio71JdSojeCv3m63qriI /WPHFRr0L6f4PfTyqo5TPBeQd4pp1z7A6aZhg+73Wv9mRie6xnrP23DGTfcWjvj7ThjLpGHZ1Ios R9rkZ9nahix9ZVn6qpLlg0Zk+bVJfpbPmpClvyxLf1WyjG5Alhfr5WeZqUeWWlmWWlWyzK9AlvWr 5Gc5vxJZ6mVZ6lXJ8qgLWc645Wc57kaWgbIsA1XHcmwXIalmQrbsJeTW5qXUeAc15qBGYBD+erUs tUYQjtShRo6rMWkCwqIadFRPoVhHdmciue5oPJkc7jezzjLCzwXT1us269VDwgOEfIMO5bnyBjQT 5kq6n5AJQkxzctJurMCNfGknJR8L4hOLtpw9ZMz+7tCKukZH3gDF2gUj52DyM+Wix9OBrMfj+3N9 6YRZPFeHreP2W69wd8t1x24+z5X2fqs7qJdTLn64it4Vda1oQRwH22MVNe6G68jC8zsPGPYmUlgg 3LArWvVDsBIfQVujQ4R8byHSXsEGWF9noY91sG3A6jpGxmFWR6G/dF7rrP1v4HkSmr1H75jgvBq0 8hqezXCyNR561KKa//UKZ9SIQx5xaLkwNCgOGbXC0J+70E6xBXuZcW0kF2DL+vxhae0uiPQxai/u n/vo/kJVu/wNUEsHCKqvay8FagAA6A0JAFBLAwQUAAgICAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGwAAAE9i amVjdFJlcGxhY2VtZW50cy9PYmplY3QgMu2dCZjdRZXFqzv7vnUWkibpbrInnfS+pJNOJ51OOiTp RBMCyCjLIBAUENBPRdQIBBUBHZFNQIRhBMFRAXVQUFxg/FRUXDAuIKAyGHEYNhkG0cy9r97513sV klcot6o+X7Vf+nTf916f33l1LhTCl2zv3bhp29oK1aj0R4WaoQo/Hj1KqVnblZozWKk9g5T+pmVA qboxSn2Inl5Js71730dfjS942Ux6VvOAeUaNOoe+qqWvKnMGlbkpf/CzKrLX0PRS+nZw/sHL8i8f oXbRV0NyVntVxXn5b/RHZYW6h2SSOmLLqm39a9dv3Hj01r7XHL26b936AX78xlys63KfW3Ofh6rx i3QK/oCqfDooz83zdu7NfeCJFdlLnlqpDvhhPb5zn6/MRJ1Gadv+ZkR+J/jNnWC9E30Da/DiXYXv XNHbeGL+BJ+lkPxrMf34VQMur7iF3otz6dfsDdSKDeZJt99+Ox9fhbqYvpmsmbZue+3mDX3F53Na LvCO3Odm+jxUPTdPqWvWKbVkiNEG6sGXDzXKczwv3xKj+34MKvquCLEo4Sn0zM1/E0SlmqIKe1H8 QW/DwSoracHbUHA4+7xxpx74jduc81uf+zyJPdQdxHR1nvVqtzemGPjAb8zSlzWJJfiT3ZqJVSx4 oUkswXvaNFNPm2DwQpNYgl9Sr5lYxYIXmsQS/LHZmolVLHihSSzB26s1E6tY8EKTWIJfMEkzsYoF LzSJJfiDIzUTq1jwQpNYgi+t1EysYsELTf7+4KXvirU0qSOvLtJPr3s13iqmb+oXvvLYJjF0pGyD 78kz7ZEMbpuk4AGD3zBUM7GKBbdNUvCAwY8ZpplYxYLbJil4wOAzhmsmVrHgtkkKHjD47jzTbsng tkkKHjD4R0doJlax4LZJCh4w+KaRmolVLLhtkoIHDD5ilGZiFQtum6TgAYPfk2e6RzK4bZKCBwz+ 3tGaiVUsuG2SggcM3jVGM7GKBbdNUvCAwZ/PMz0vGdw2ScEDBr9trGZiFQtum6TgAYOfMk4zsYoF t01S8IDB54/XTKxiwW2TFDxg8N/lmX4nGdw2ScEDBr92gmZiFQtum6TgAYMfNVEzsYoFt01S8IDB p0zSTKxiwW2TFDxg8B/lmX4kGdw2ScEDBr+oSjOxigW3TVLwgMH7J2smVrHgtkkKHjD44CmaiVUs uG2SggcMfnee6W7J4LZJCh4w+FlTNROrWHDbJAUPGLxtmmZiFQtum6TgAYM/nWd6WjK4bZKCBwz+ 7wdpJlax4LZJCh4w+EnTNROrWHDbJAUPGPyQGZqJVSy4bZKCBwz+cJ7pYcngtkkKHjD4x6s1E6tY cNskBQ8YfPvBmolVLLhtkoIHDD5hpmZiFQtum6TgAYPfl2e6TzK4bZKCBwz+gVmaiVUsuG2SggcM 3lujmVjFgtsmKXjA4HvzTHslg9smKXjA4F+p1UysYsFtkxQ8YPC31WkmVrHgtkkKHjB44yGaiVUs uG2SggcM/sc80x8lg9smKXjA4DfN1kysYsFtkxQ8YPB/nqOZWMWC2yYpeMDgM+dqJlax4LZJCh4w +C/zTL+UDG6bpOABg186TzOxigW3TVLwgMFfM18zsYoFt01S8IDBRy/QTKxiwW2TFDxg8G/nmb4t Gdw2ScEDBj93oWZiFQtum6TgAYN3L9JMrGLBbZMUPGDwF/NML0oGt01S8IDBv7hYM7GKBbdNUvCA wd9Sr5lYxYLbJil4wOCLl2gmVrHgtkkKHjD443mmxyWD2yYpeMDg/7pUM7GKBbdNUvCAwd/QoJlY xYLbJil4wOAHNWomVrHgtkkKHjD4A3mmBySD2yYpeMDgH2nSTKxiwW2TFDxg8I3NmolVLLhtkoIH DD6sRTOxigW3TVLwgMG/mWf6pmRw2yQFDxj8Pa2aiVUsuG2SggcM3tmmmVjFgtsmKXjA4H/KM/1J MrhtkoIHDP75ds3EKhbcNknBAwZ/U4dmYhULbpuk4AGDz+vUTKxiwW2TFDxg8N/kmX4jGdw2ScED Bv/EMs3EKhbcNknBAwY/skszsYoFt01S8IDBq5ZrJlax4LZJCh4w+P15pvslg9smKXjA4B9aoZlY xYLbJil4wODrujUTq1hw2yQFDxi8cqVmYhULbpuk4AGDfzXP9FXJ4LZJCh4w+Dt7NBOrWHDbJAUP GLxllWZiFQtum6TgAYM/lWd6SjK4bZKCBwx+y2rNxCoW3DZJwQMGP6FXM7GKBbdNUvCAwevWaCZW seC2SQoeMPhDeaaHJIPbJil4wOBX9mkmVrHgtkkKHjD4trWaiVUsuG2SggcMPm6dZmIVC26bpOAB g38vz/Q9yeC2SQoeMPj5/ZqJVSy4bZKCBwy+er1mYhULbpuk4AGD/yXP9BfJ4LZJCh4w+B2HaiZW seC2SQoeMPiSIZpFNLhtEkPwKwZrFrCJBLdNUvDAwZ/s1kysYsELTVLwwMF72jQTq1jwQpMUPHDw S+o1E6tY8EKTFDxw8MdmayZWseCFJil44ODt1ZqJVSx4oUkKHjj4BZM0E6tY8EKTFDxw8AdHaiZW seCFJil44OBLKzUTq1jwQpMUPGBw/H8DosFtk78/eJHReYXfnEjfjCetpckXxih176FK3bPGvOL8 PnIuegUb3mUM167fuLH4Xbs2B3tl7rO+1Q9Rt9JZLqMfe8sQoy30o3kOXZbD3alUX9/55+/77j21 cj9vwMs/vnOfr8xEncbv8itG4+QzSCZYyV+mYRqdns9BDtCwE3PPOzb3eRF9NjiwBw7wMpy/tXm5 R/Zp3rpXZP7qNfJV6teb6eWf6lXqhKFGP0lmPIfyPEC/3NG89At2sAcO8DIciX65mkfXr3kEOJHA aocZHU1mPIdODNMvdzQv/YId7IEDvAxHol+u5tH167cE9p7VSj00zOg7CJTnUJ4H6Jc7mpd+wQ72 wAFehiPRL1fz6Pr1CQL8wyqlrhhu9HcEynMozwP0yx3NS79gB3vgAC/DkeiXq3l0/XodAR5GYNtG GN1M4DyHHhamX+5oXvoFO9gDB3gZjkS/XM2j69dkAvxGj1LjRhq9k0B5DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzg ZTgS/XI1j65f9xNYPYF9d6TReQTOc2h97hB3+u6XO5qXfsEO9sABXoYj0S9X8+j6dSEBXkkFOH+U 0UsIlOfQK3MF2em7X+5oXvoFO9gDB3gZjkS/XM2j69c6AhxCYKtGG91LynPokDD9ckfz0i/YwR44 wMtwJPrlah5dvyoJ8PRupV4q0DcxaIHyPEC/3NG89At2sH+pQDE//e/5Dxpzj+ynX67m0fXrawT2 0Aql7hhjdDeB8hzK8wD9ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv95JgOsJ7MyxRnsJnOfQ9WH65Y7mpV+w gz1wgJfhSPTL1Ty6frUS4BeXK7V0nNHPESjPoTwP0C93NC/9gh3sgQO8DEeiX67m0fXrKQKrIbA/ jDM6ncB5Dq0J0y93NC/9gh3sgQO8DEeiX67m0fXrMwR4YZdSnxpv9HwC5TmU5wH65Y7mpV+wgz1w gJfhSPTL1Ty6fp1IgC8sU+rYCUafIVCeQ3keoF/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zNo+tXHQEeT2DVE42+ gcB5Dj0+TL/c0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJfrmaR9evXxPY/Z1K/Xyi0e8SKM+hPA/QL3c0L/2CHeyBA7wM R6JfrubR9etKAlxOYJdMMtpG4DyHLg/TL3c0L/2CHeyBA7wMR6JfrubR9eswArypQ6nNVUavJ1Ce Q3keoF/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zNo+vXeAKsIrCRk42OJXCeQ6vC9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5 dP36HoHtbFfq3slGzyJQnkN5HqBf7mhe+gU72AMHeBmORL9czaPr1/sJ8Ik2pd43xehjBMpzKM8D 9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5dP1aTTyHE9jyqUZfQ+A8hx4epl/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zNo+vX X4nnW61KvTDV6FcJlOdQngfolzual37BDvbAAV6GI9EvV/Po+vVlAlxKYLdPM7qAwHkOXRqmX+5o XvoFO9gDB3gZjkS/XM2j69dbCfCqFqVOPcjopQTKcyjPA/TLHc1Lv2AHe+AAL8OR6JereXT9aiDA YQS2cLrRCgLnOXRYmH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65fTxDYmc30DyPTjZ5CoDyH8jxAv9zRvPQL drAHDvAyHIl+uZpH168bCfDhJqWum2H0FwTKcyjPA/TLHc1Lv2AHe+AAL8OR6JereXT9Oo4ANxDY P1Ub7SNwnkM3hOmXO5qXfsEO9sABXoYj0S9X8+j6dTABfqlRqakHG/08gfIcyvMA/XJH89Iv2MEe OMDLcCT65WoeXb9+QWB1BPaTg41WEzjPoXVh+uWO5qVfsIM9cICX4Uj0y9U8un59jAwvbqBfM41+ gEB5DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65fWwjwxaVKHTrL6HMEynMozwP0yx3NS79gB3vgAC/D keiXq3l0/RpFgCcQ2JAao8cQOM+hJ4Tplzual37BDvbAAV6GI9EvV/Po+vWfBPZjOtGv1xi9j0B5 DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65f5xBgN4GdXWu0g8B5Du0O0y93NC/9gh3sgQO8DEeiX67m 0fVrBQHeTN+01xm9gUB5DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65fLxDYFPrmmTqj4wmc59ApYfrl jualX7CDPXCAl+FI9MvVPLp+fYEAz1ms1GcPMXo2PchzKM8D9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5dP06 jQD/m97AHbONPk6gPIfyPEC/3NG89At2sAcO8DIciX65mkfXr0UEeCSBzZljdCuB8xx6ZJh+uaN5 6RfsYA8c4GU4Ev1yNY+uX/9FYPcuVOqROUbvJlCeQ3keoF/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zNo+vX9QTY SGBXzzW6iMB5Dm0M0y93NC/9gh3sgQO8DEeiX67m0fXr9QR4zQKlDp9n9HIC5TmU5wH65Y7mpV+w gz1wgJfhSPTL1Ty6fk0jwBEENnG+0UEEznPoiDD9ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv35KYG8jyB/M N3oagfIcyvMA/XJH89Iv2MEeOMDLcCT65WoeXb8+TFCPEtwHFxj9Fc14DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzg ZTgS/XI1j65fGwhwE4H1LTS6jmB5Dt0Upl/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zNo+vXUAK8gy6H/CZCbyNQ nkNzc//9ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv75BYLMJ7M5FRmcSOM+hs8P0yx3NS79gB3vgAC/DkeiX q3l0/Xo3AX5kjlJvX2z0AgLlOZTnAfrljualX7CDPXCAl+FI9MvVPLp+dRDgS7OVaqo3+jyB8hzK 8wD9ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv54lsJP4X5LWGz2OwHkOPSlMv9zRvPQLdrAHDvAyHIl+uZpH 16/P0Rc/PUSpTy8x+gMC5TmU5wH65Y7mpV+wgz1wgJfhSPTL1Ty6fp1MgD0EdvxSo8sInOfQnjD9 ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv+YS4GfqlKppMPopAuU5lOcB+uWO5qVfsIM9cICX4Uj0y9U8un49 SmDTCOxXDUYnEjjPodPC9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5dP26mgDPrVXqskaj7yZQnkN5HqBf7mhe +gU72AMHeBmORL9czaPr1xEE+D81Sr22yegeAuU5lOcB+uWO5qVfsIM9cICX4Uj0y9U8un5NIsCj CGxMs9HDCJzn0KNyh7jTd7/c0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJfrmaR9evHxLYt2cp9Z1mo98gUJ5DeR6gX+5o XvoFO9gDB3gZjkS/XM2j69cFBNhMYOe1GK0ncJ5Dm8P0yx3NS79gB3vgAC/DkeiXq3l0/eojwGtn KrWy1eiVBMpzKM8D9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5dP3i34R4FIH9uUCHEHhFgY4K0y93NC/9gh3s /1ygmI+S6pereXT9uovA3s6/yWKb0dMJlOdQngfolzual37BDvbAAV6GI9EvV/Po+vUOAvxttVJn tBt9iCB4DuV5gH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65fzQQ4QGD1HUb7CYLn0IEw/XJH89Iv2MEeOMDL cCT65WoeXb+eJLCv0Nn8vsPoFwiU51CeB+iXO5qXfsEO9sABXoYj0S9X8+j6dTMBziWwGzqN1hA4 z6Fzw/TLHc1Lv2AHe+AAL8OR6JereXT9eiMBfnS6UkcvM3ohgfIcyvMA/XJH89Iv2MEeOMDLcCT6 5WoeXb9qCfCvByk1o8voCwTKcyjPA/TLHc1Lv2AHe+AAL8OR6JereXT9epDATiawn3UZPZ7AeQ49 OUy/3NG89At2sAcO8DIciX65mkfXr8sJ8GfTlPqX5UbvJ1CeQ3keoF/uaF76BTvYAwd4GY5Ev1zN o+vXVgJcTWCbVhhdTuA8h64O0y93NC/9gh3sgQO8DEeiX67m0fVrLAF+dqpSw7uN3kSgPIfyPEC/ 3NG89At2sAcO8DIciX65mkfXr+8S2HQCu6fbaBWB8xw6PUy/3NG89At2sAcO8DIciX65mkfXr10E uIuY3rvS6HsJlOdQngfolzual37BDvbAAV6GI9EvV/Po+tVDgE9PVqqrx+gTxMhzKM8D9MsdzUu/ YAd74AAvw5Hol6t5dP16icBeT2DP9xg9nBh5Dn19mH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65f/0GA36lS 6tZVRr9FoDyH8jxAv9zRvPQLdrAHDvAyHIl+uZpH168zCbCVwE5ZbXQpgfMc2hqmX+5oXvoFO9gD B3gZjkS/XM2j69cSArxuklLze41eRaA8h/I8QL/c0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJfrmaR9evPQQ2hsB+22t0 GIHzHDomTL/c0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJfrmaR9evfyPAd06kx9YYPZNAeQ7leYB+uaN56RfsYA8c4GU4 Ev1yNY+uX8fQD35sglKv6zP6MIHyHMrzAP1yR/PSL9jBHjjAy3Ak+uVqHl2/qunHbCGwKWuNHkrg PIduCdMvdzQv/YId7IEDvAxHol+u5tH1azf9mLvGK/WjtUa/RKA8h/I8QL/c0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJ frmaR9evjxLgfAK7cJ3ROgLnOXR+mH65o3npF+xgDxzgZTgS/XI1j65fAwT4sXFK9fcbvZhAeQ7l eYB+uaN56RfsYA8c4GU4Ev1yNY+uXyMIUBHYoPVGXyTlOVSF6Zc7mpd+wQ72wAFehiPRL1fz6Pp1 L4G9eaxSd683egKB8hzK8wD9ckfz0i/YwR44wMtwJPrlah5dv3YS4M/HKHXWoUZ/TKA8h/I8QL/c 0bz0C3awBw7wMhyJfrmaR9evLgJcQ2CtG4x2EzjPoWvC9MsdzUu/YAd74AAvw5Hol6v5q9evfdDo LalQ/M8v0wYr9QD1ee1Qpao26B9bQzJFHbGt74htR29ZtX5g29b+VVv6zNvJHxfQ61eRDlJdiv9m vnHHcW8849i37jjt1Jqtx556pn7SdGLfu1flQu/zsXdQTj6Qf2sr1PvzfHvpg060QhGaau1cpk6n J7TR1wfR4Nf03vC8gZrVoFoVf8ff8zo8Sb8uIsvFlTzNnkGJ+N/EjMgn6tvcW/geWg9V7P+hyv0/ NGi/D23cv9eWwof499Kp2vc9f0VneTFNLqO/9901TJ9pzGf5YXr02vWFZ9le8izby+gsh+TPsHlE /Hs5dJi9l50lz7KzjM7y7OF6L28eGf9evnt48V420v8OfJa5Z5TNWT47Qp9h7ej49/K5EcV72aia S55lcxmd5Y5Rei8vHxP/Xp48yt7LUnefxrK6+zwyWp/h2HHx7+Wjo+29LHX3aSyru8/hY/Ve7hof /14eMdbey1J3n8ayuvv8YJw+w5cmxL+XPxxXvJdNJe8+TWV19+mboPeS/1uw2Pdy7YTivWwqefdp Kqu7z50T9RnuqYp/L++aaO9lqbtPU1ndfZqq9F4eMyX+vWyusvey1N2nqazuPp+erM9w99T49/Lm yfZelrr7NJXV3admqt7LgYPi38vaqcV72Vzy7tNcVnefy6fpM7x3evx7ecW04r1sLnn3aS6ru8+Y 6Xovu6rj38ux0+29LHX3aS6ru895M/QZ3nZw/Hu5a4a9l6XuPs1ldff5c7XeywWz4t/Ll6rtvSx1 92kuq7vPGTP1GX6yJv69PHNm8V62lLz7tJTV3WfPLL2XU+vi38s/zCrey5aSd5+Wsrr7HF2rz/Ci Q+Lfy2Nq7b0sdfdpKau7z8/q9F4OnhP/Xu6us/ey1N2npazuPptm6zN819z493Jgtr2Xpe4+LWV1 97lnjt7LZ+bFv5f3ziney9aSd5/Wsrr7dOXPcMeC+Pdy+bzivWwtefdpLau7z63z9V4+vDD+vbxt vr2Xpe4+rWV195mfP8Pti+PfywUL7b0sdfdpLau7z7WL9F5+vz7+vfzkInsvS919Wsvq7jMlf4Zr lsa/l1Pri/eyreTdp62s7j4XLdF7eWdD/Ht58ZLivWwrefdpK6u7z6D8GTY2xb+XgxvsvSx192kr q7vPWY16L29qjn8v39Vo72Wpu09bWd19nm7SZzirNf69fKbJ3stSd5+2srr7nNSi9/Kytvj3ckdL 8V62l7z7tJfV3efhVn2GYzri38tHWov3sr3k3ae9rO4+h7XrvTy3M/693N5u72Wpu097Wd197uvQ Z/jisvj38vsd9l6Wuvu0l9Xdp3eZ3svTl8e/l2uW2XtZ6u7TXlZ3n6906TP8/Yr49/LOruK97Ch5 9+koq7tP4wq9l0evjH8vm1YU72VHybtPR1ndfW7s1mf4QE/8e3lTt72Xpe4+HWV195nZo/dy4+r4 93JWj72Xpe4+HWV197l0lT7Db/XGv5eXrbL3stTdp6Os7j6je/VeLuuLfy/H9BbvZWfJu09nWd19 zl2jz/DWtfHv5Xlriveys+Tdp7Os7j7/16f3cl5//Hv5Yp+9l6XuPp1ldfd5yzp9hp9YH/9enr7O 3stSd5/Osrr7PN6v93Lyhvj38vf99l6Wuvt0ltXd52OE8Rf6e2UrvSHL++M9S856Kb1iWL/+HXUb ci+pUPiNlBte2Zl5/e2wKN7mbv0WX7wy3reYf6vnI+h5R65kT6Wa6E1tyPkPyr/N3WT2YAVP8o/J r4nvg7quVR/UI23xH9QtbfqgWg5wUC3/qAf13GJ9UM1L4j+ov9brg2o7wEG1/aMe1NrZ+qB2zYn/ oLbM0QfVcYCD6vhHPKg7iPCKGfqgdlfHe1D8V+Uv04+7vlpf6Rpzh8FHZa50OKp35a502TPK5krH Z/nERH2WC6viP8s/TcJZNpU8S2/3jojOcsVIfZZnj4r/LNeNwlm2lDxLb1eTiM7yIxX6LH9YGf9Z frwSZ9lW8iy93V4iOcuvk9mzdFl46zalVs13eUX9Jnr2XHomnetx81xf8Wt6xXn0iv+d+6r/YUMf pB9/Ff3Y+QNGlxEYz6E8V2qn7z9syB2Nk4v/YUOwgz1wgJfhSPxhQ67mPv6woc+Q5xvI62tblbpm nor2r2Db86wnEuNw+rqX2vVm9TZ6V08lXn5fh+fmP6VfZ5DtjfRrLf3cFnL5Cf2qox82fgg/a59X Bv0rXO/g/T80ZP8PDd3vQ4fv/6HeYft96NX7C+2F+cJ+KH+uNeoc+qqWX55b68pskZoHUO6Z23me vRT6/1BLBwhzGJDnpBwAABAqAgBQSwMEFAAICAgANqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAoAAABzdHlsZXMu eG1s3Vldb9s2FH3frxBUYNiA0ZTsJI212HlYMaxAGwztundaomSukiiQVOz01++SFGXJshSt3dBt KZBA5LmXl+d+Sr27Pxa590iFZLzc+OEi8D1axjxhZbbxP/z2M7r177ff3PE0ZTGNEh7XBS0Vkuop p9ID4VJGdnPj16KMOJFMRiUpqIxUHPGKlk4o6qIjc5RdMcrmihtwV1rRo5orrLE9WbKbf7IBd6UT QQ5zhTUWOO2Kp3yu8FHmKOUo5kVFFDuz4piz8uPG3ytVRRgfDofFYbXgIsPher3GZrc1OG5xVS1y g0piTHOqD5M4XITYYQuqyFz7NLZrUlkXOypmU0MUGXi1ElQCBK6r43Keoq5ML74es9nR9ZiN0Bzv iZgdZwbcD5VVMj9UVklXtiBqP+LfW/wWNs2vt29OcSWKuWdpbI+qWLBq9jUtuivPOW9N1QI22Y25 yyC4wva5gz5Mwg+CKSo68HgSHpM8bhnnxSXSABdiQCD6qEPeoYW+9KjmayxoxYVqDUnnFztgZ9mm 6l4V+Xiq6l0HzUSSXISCOSsMaQtJgx4ZPbzo1bJp/tfYgHyvqcGdug82miMjJUgpdVg0qdcog3vJ hbkv0nqNRqsFqsYSQ4VSmCfpUiTpAh78rWsZKYd2kZKYooTGudze2VRvlz37rEnc+G8Y1A1zsPce zPA9yEcHLVj+tPG/JRWXP57h7KLv9VRrPMpoSQWDqJEHJmUPUTEVQ149EsEMKXjatFf0D/J7PW1W BzPHpCepaPGcTXiMx2bddmJne0JTUudNf3aaGxuN71FMc+0du3VaQpUAvwrFoKs7VTErCGzkcKjc +Cg8UVQRQTJBqv1QDFTC6bxCCZOKlHouCBbXrDwJ6yY8lDP3G4mClEc5KbOaZLBLS7MQ87pUAq71 4b1/rgJBnJLy3GcG4/Q4yKe922kUuo2fHoZqdWfI6XFacQvas3PV7dbrB+PaCz6b40jDPItbLzbP XU71uBHJPUn4AUGgSKrQUTsiDG9D8MWl/afO/ixHazeSWnFZEe1lllBuoSSv9sTdvarLWNXGm+gA 2xD3TLPQ8sZKinaCEphhpILEUG5HF38YmVDBE1BfAbc9j7Ayobrg6nHUKNF2mLE1Jbmk3Rg3ASlP jF+61XR01pIimN80XebwmOccBhwlamqi8ZkaBQmfzqgIgheknCwI7VmSfQJSwmWlZqdHThU0U/SR itLQZI3vHKZ1uvBfXlXqS3PG6Gtj/qLGL00WO2k2A2cvWWwpeQj8M5DXPBWshBBSNAO5hGVMQYkz FQ5f0OmCY3jAK2uPP15r8bjwOyqnZb02XtuXLtQ/dyxs2zix71ZMkRwqRjd1a0gdYRPHYiTPWTIC ObBED6E63UcQTUacsuMUqwfKsj3MVzueJx1XPsOsJWf5Wew0xE5Q/wsl+h337+F+oovaKpmzrESS 10IXypQdnXIYKynRfEEglspVrunqC6yelG78GARhRB7trmcF46YpGJeC48v81TAafhalzh1zKBXc vuIhKCLa/HUwNBKfTUfNo45fPdjGqD826eaCcvLEa9W709uqCP0LoKFR/WaVC6R2J5/s4XbnpaRZ SznXRbnvMF2b9o0TgsVyff2S2apeEJHBXk5TvdNfFA2+v7rjSuk3oWARrG+vbGvH41Y15nwNS6FF XzSzbxIe+GKGD5f/Mx/qvR0Xif7GAourqxtWeqZ8ey8C82MgFUnsdzzABC9DJ0jij5mAJpu4mv0i DvS/lqQOAt4AMjoImcGF/xsx9e+l7fkYx6MVrNkoiGxVtHWtWdSapqaWblZcKHzW/O2d+XpaNX/l nlKL3t7f39/h88VmpToj4SwAtC/d+yaT8Kr5NGiClpv29F/1XZoHbbYd07ahO6+zNjDBqeqRPmkC HvD4HLXvmi9FE8wuB8y6aSDTbU0b9BfJ9r6zOMVU3oXY5+8HRPRO6i2ZPDo7PSHK3dF8duo27gcY 0FoQeiR5DYvLIAxRcINWkBzBDV4FWK80Vmjg9gfPGQzWL1fR8jq6um6NvhQ+ffu+Wkx5uAs07yrb 9boLtGv/UOzhy9mOL///zPZPUEsHCJ3z0ZISBgAA3xkAAFBLAwQUAAgICAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAFAAAAE9iamVjdCAxL2NvbnRlbnQueG1szZ3fcxs5csff81e4dM+C0A2gAbh2fVVJVe7lLi9J qvJKS7StHCUqlLy289enMfzVjZVs7e51dURpRuR3SM5nBgN8gQEaP/35693mzS/r3ePt9v7nCwjx 4s36/np7c3v/8eeL//yPf71sF39+908/bT98uL1ev73ZXn++W98/XV5v7594/Ybfff/4dq/+fPF5 d/92u3q8fXx7v7pbP759un67fVjfH9/1Vm79dvmu/SuPT982r377srF899P669Nr3zy2Ve9dvX/9 Ny8by3ff7FZfXvvmsS0fVPn2D9vXvvnr4+byw5aP+t3D6ul22ouvm9v7v/988enp6eHt1dWXL1/C lxS2u49X0Hu/WtTTDl+ftnv4vNssW91cX6036/Flj1cQ4Oq47d36afXa/Rvbyl26/3z3fr179aFZ Pa1+dVYff/n46hTxy8cXDs31p9Xu1Wlj2Vif3nTz+tObbuR771ZPn144J+3qbywui7/99ZwWdnev /a6xrTpU17vbh1dj7reW799ut6ddHW/YX6DL7mKM+Wr/XGz95bubf9ndPq13YvPr725+vdpcn474 9u65g8bbwRVvcbn+ZSTTU8IfB+LxhTfg1V4+bfx48+JH/9ff/vrv15/Wd6vzxrc/3vjy9v7xaXV/ PjK7cRJeJC1Xu/XDdvd0OjAfXp9h8tnC0759errbvHy5D/W46cfdzc2zm/LupCu+9PnCu/zldv3l Tyo//H566FfLRqeEe7veHK+S07YHnPXXh/XudpCsNiMhXN498kHjxLF9eCverfPE3d3X133cSBDb mw/zJ54ujsN7ReHGx3A5JG+fdqv7x7ElZxlDOsDycX8My/m4HF++EO8/hXNGTlCPm6cr/kbc3XwI /OTi3bFcXH1+2o7Pur5c8rHHdz/tc8BDRrh/9c0+jxssP1/8W7yYNnpzeHZ3e78gfeT33dx+vH3i FA4XV+9+unrmM9/9tP/QX3/B9Se4OLzwYXV3u/k2XuIM7uL4lo+71cMn3uMHPnbr3dPt+vHNKKP4 o3bbv/MH3G/v18vXim/43tfh979ueSa/bJ/djiN3+bB9vN2fiKfd5+VLf8MuvuHs//AKlwKbLRc7 f3qfxuNiv/WH283muO3phdOmaxqP83cOhyC/8MOWkxQ7nsfb/+VvbA9PJ8zjq5ecYFb3L2ijXNqs v+7V33A00+86mo/f7t5vN5dP3x74Q06J8uKg3t5fbz7frC8/3d7crO8vr9ebDaetD6vN4/riO6dD SvujIF9+2q1XT5fru4enb8dP3KxXv6wvP64ejts8PrAJWV9udzfDFKTjy7vbj5+eLlf3Hzfrm8vV 1/Xj+fy/9jDl5w/T4cUlf1v+vRRX3XeP4M0t7+zq2+Vm9X690aSb7ccVF22f7m6vp6O2W49MZs2X 6259vT9yB33xmwv8ez5Of5+P9lfOac5HO3435b+czP+/pd3ymzOe77K99mvpH50W1NU03nRzuX/p Qm+w/7zH//m82q0n6cvtzfCBMWC5vpu0T+uR/k/i78/1Tl8SWxvf8szRZKNVGj2X/x2UV6Yh+k4a elY7pSH6bWmo/rHC63G7ub35xxUNr93r9g9M+c/s0PXy8+sdunrRhhyE99ubb6cnyz69+2mfFpfl sheHVIQ5JKjHZHRMo9AClDxeXeqTbz/t1mxfQzgm6evN6vHxgLvkd6e0Lq64YUmO37thf3N/80Y+ ETkhP9t/PycchNBaOe4QH9MWapdXk/oGHEdnLzxstly6cLb77IZ8gPf1+VFoXbIf/MgJ+eZmtx4c //5pvX6C8M/49vhfifHN4f+/nF79C7963I19/rL9vLvmAnb1uC9AxiHZbj7f3Z9oYsiNBEwMidLx +fEUxNAh/+oU1BBpcB/5RulxKrXYFe9d7tfjDu1BH9gwr3bfLr8+f7jy6dOuV2w5t7uRJn/jcVnS 43mXvr97357fvW8/2r2Pu9ubZzcpUxK8W/33dvfCLj2udyJ3Vx9Dx4/5ZbX5vH68/A798+f/11fA 8VuXlPGwZU9/sgsP7JnWXGvKvYtd3e/e8W1fVpvNs7taz0n8w2a73T27UROfe7oQ3v20P7XL8nCa 92/YbLkafrmv2KmtuJRasWu73CfjR63tXxxf9Nve8aqPeXbTw2fvtl8mgV+ZPpRPIL8y/NfDrz56 r02vnCqMIwUcSn3Omm/vP14cP+jdvyw79eYv/Hn7F5774Ktf7dhzx+dZhtdQvWI/977z9ualK/Yd xu8SvOYrOe2tni6Uwgm6jU9/aS+mK+fd2Po3Hsl/xNF5h2BEXyqEjI1Xy/L8jbPiQo1G1FyCBUrH h6SeFBfqZEQNNXExnWJOuTYkQT0pLtTZiDqK6/vdeOZCV2zoUsuCbjxzoft+ivn9dNQxpFh5tSwF 6aS4UH8/d/j91KWUUE4/4jqdFRfqZkTNpUw4FjaQk6CeFBfq76ew30+dgOtTOTespRGCoJ4UD+pk 5LkSyjx5PHOhM/JUKXYKtWboqeSWZK41KS7URp4qqXI2OZWzycg7YY89xH58gMwZtOJCbeSdsGEK BXsGqJSrpJ4UF2ojT4U1Y2jnAkeW+FpxoTbyWkhEgU4/Vbo7rbhQG3ktLD0H/tv/kjTsSnBhNnJa WJBCglJbzzVRk9BacaE2clqYCULhGhLBspQ1T614UP+g3vYHqGWpPJ650Bk5LUwZQiZeLosi21C0 4kJt5LSQC59wKoNQ+MtZcaG2cmCYkOu+DVIvKTeZa02KC7WVA4MGocHpIVuEteJCbeXAIKWQzj+S Wisu1FYOLDYKvVBBqKmDpJ4UF2orBxbzuHoTdMitJ1kuT4oLtZUHU7VldKotZyOvBb30AC1RTZm6 bAGZFQ/qYuS1oGOUpD+4Y2lFZ+S1oDUM6VzlF6ST4kJt5LWA6wMBTpWDIqm14kJt5LXYT0BIGGvJ Fag3Sa0VF2ojrwW11lBPP5J6UlyojbwW1FxCLseHTOGT4kJt5LWA60fh3LkBJLVWXKiNvBZQYzaI BWm08shyeVJcqI28FlApASpmSLUneaq14MJs5cAIawBolHMklZVpwYOZrPwXSU89nrnQWfmvUhOX QTF3aDGhPKWT4kJt5b9KbiG1Gjst900ltVZcqK38V8EUWuy8WpaSWisu1Fb+q6jrtzhdv1Y+K1cK h95KvJTX76S4UFv5LHaOoZxNpKTWigu1lc/KCUNLpWFsvajrd1JcqK18Ftf/w2gAiKU1TOpca8WF 2spppc414mPP2ShLqEnxoK5WXiu91G98VlyorTxYKsjmGalSLJSypNaKC7WVB0sv3Y2ZFRdqKw/G 9eAQuVrMNcMSSV3XWnGhtvJg2Gvgv/2vPNVacGG2cmbYpO/kZy50Vg4MKYVzlx6ZZ02KC7WVA8NM oZbEq7GUXmRSXKitHBhXH8JpTASqy1crLtRWDgw5P4bWW00ZapVue1I8qH+Qm/wBalVbdupD36yc FrRx5srhV5a+k+JCbeW0oPJVmni5X0hqrbhQWzktKBQIib1UxCzb57Xgwmzls+ClPuaz4kJt5bTY RYZDL4HRFCCpteJCbeXAAChg7VxVqFSzOtdacaG2cmAQUzgNX9N5mVZcqK0cWOwx9PNwIEE9KS7U Vg4s1haoALWSepIjy2fFg7pbObD40oiZWXGhtnJmseTQc+HVWKpzrRUXaitnFjPnWUs7bqOu2jsn xYXaypnFhAFLi5T5EpY9kmfFhdrKm0UELpWp8NnMWY6PmhUXaitvFiGGQ/ef0SIkqbXiQm3lzVQ/ bHDqh92NPFhvPVCPFYE4S5a9V2fFhdrIg/XaQ+mnTuZZHmetuFAbebBO44weH1VeOkrwYIYfXFZ/ ADpKUJeLl7NHI7gSQ+bF4Q9kGaAVH2wjq9UzBDh3FiBZ4GvFB9vIa3HtKMTUWhonNMuoP7Pig21k tjqmEJ+9ZTErPthGbqvrTuayjJoUH2wju9Vj4XpxTLWm0rIMozIrPthGPqz1GqATElBDlLGtZsUH 28iItdZCO/+IxrBZ8cE2cmKtjVs1qWfOrzOgwtaKCzYYebFWMVQ8PWQinxQfbCOX1igH/jv+ijrW rPhgG7k0LpsCPNsBcFZ8sI1cGhdNoZRaEAFTk3XLWfHBNnJpLWM4DQ5rXSbySfHBNnJpbLnDqWWX ZD/uWfHBNnJpDWtYbs1R66S6r8+KD7aVS8MYCiCvliVIbK34YFu5NEiccXElE2PijEs0d8+KD7aV S4vEpgQ5IcdaSLoVLbhAWwW7l7Hu3zmFsgerWPa1p5AaF0idS+FIogVlVnywjZxYbTSmm8FcegSS wVZmxQfbyInVNiam4eV+obC14oNt5MRqzeEQPniMfRW+e1Z8sI2cWJW3YavPnVewCnNfCUKPmVfL EiWpVnywjfxWLYXhSoERVCaiqEvNig+2kd+qJUpSpzLYyFXVzJlQo5iJTx7JKAWz4oJtFdC+phaO 4WN5KQujSfHBtnJcYzAz5ow1t9hBOq5J8cG2clxcC0bRoCmHYGrFB9vKcY15DWPmyxdrgy7P9qT4 YFs5LqCQoXaIOVcuieUwY634YFs5LoAA4kdia8UH28qLxRKWGAX7cIby2p4UH2wrLxZjqNg78j9j LbG14oNt5MWol3CKqhvl0IxZ8cE2cmnUY6DMRTNGyEnemJ0VF2yrYPikoqM3UYDNig+2kUujFkMr ECk17LVVia0VH2wjl0aVwojFkVrEBjKAw6z4YBu5NKojQGvj1bJEia0VH2wjl6bnqJGDcWbFB9vI pRFhONyMG4Es5dmeFB9sI5dGpYaSMmb+h9fi7s2s+GAbuTQqic8pIFesW6+yBjYrPthWLi23cO5H I5v6Z8UH28ql5RywlxTZi3GKlol8UlywrcLok5zRlnwmtAWrKPqU2GgSlNZzTL3KCsek+GBbebEE 4RxoSHatmBUfbCsvhjXkEnvjM4ogO8nNig+2lRfDFFJlA5KWpUzkk+KDbeXFoIfT7VcVdHtWfLCt vBiUcJ48T94EmBUfbCsvBmOCudypca7ZSGFrxQfbyovFOqbF7IlqbE22hs+KD7aVF4sjxPoyNCUW 0thaccG2CqmvIuo7BdQHq4j6pY/gOwk7dCxZXsGz4oNt5MVKR75O8fibJLZWfLCNvFhpLfRSYynI 9XNpSmbFB9vIi5XGZTDxcr+oElsrPthGXqzoyTFRYmvFB9vIi3FNKiRIWFIEjFlY0FnxwTbyYqXm 0ErEznVngK6wteKDbeTFio60LhP5pPhgG3mxQi3EXLkKOXqbyMhys+KCbRVyv1AOxwkURhcEia0V H2wrl0aclGMqsdUKyq1owQfayqOVFo7TWXNilud6UnywrTzaCCDHhVTPtVeS8UFnxQfbyqMVCKdZ 6KKcOGVWfLCtPFpuoTw7j/2s+GBbeTQ1q2aW1c5J8cG28mgZA2dYrUFaxhRKbK34YFt5tNQDu+6W kTqRSuST4oNt5dEScXUDRyQXwih7j86KC7ZVUP6i58ORjQyT4oNt5dFSDKlRZTuWIHd5bU+KD7aV Sxs38SryallKuzIpPthWLg1zOIwoTTnLaM+z4oNt5dKQvdi+N/CY0U3WRCbFB9vKpUFj592Ov7IA mxQfbCuXBhQAe0y4RDmWnnxSfLCtXBpwMUWtN65icu1SnW2t+GBbuTSI4dgJGpNqW5kUH2wrlxZr 6Il4tSxlATYpLthWgftLLOEczlrdE5kUH2wrlxYxEFd0IsRcQTUqTYoPtpVLk/ewnSaV/lH75O+G y52NZhwza2TMrYpzOis+2EZeLPccWuaqZGyYq+z2Pis+2EZejCtQIYmYuBJbKz7YRl4stx5qPwVu F/n1rPhgG3kxvmr5nHbKmWqMMv73rPhgG3mx3MYVfHoUia0VH2wjL5YbhgwYKaYIyovNigf2j6aX /APYUZK6lM5oFcE/18q+ikvBiL3pczopPthGjitXdtG8OP5JbK34YFt5sYqhRxrDN3JscpztrPhg W3mxGsO57wGoRK4VH2wrL0YtYEdqh4XAnhQfbCsvRhQi51tQ+fKtss17VnywrbwYpVCpAZSeOd9U Z1srPthWXowglPMQDlnhmBQfbCsvVnpIaUTAKDnKseST4AJtFb8/vxjRfVZ8sK082uhZVCmNG5S1 yOmGZsUH28qjFQyNU3JrVDtm6dEmxQfbyqOVGGrMiIVNCcgZLWfFB9vKo40OVb1Bio2NGMp8fFJ8 sK08WqawRJvcT7Ets7RJ8cG28mg5h3z+kdf2pPhgW3m00Y+sU4KUuKpVFLZWfLCtPFqOIREnYq5Q V65kSmyt+GBbebTUQioExP/wWmZpk+KCbRXBP4/uc3R+SGyt+GBbubSUQ2odckQ2oXIYwKz4YFu5 tISB/46/ClsrPthWLi2N+U0TVq5mIUV552NSfLCtXBq+1CF+VnywrVwavhS6bVZ8sK1cGuZQa6sE kUBNuD4rPthWLg1HW3jNrXWuYDZpVybFB9vKpSGE8zRp+mxrxQfbyqVBD1yZ7zXV3kGGSp8VF2yr +QAy1HDuECy7SM+KD7aVS4MSSsu8WpYKWys+2FYuDVLYD9DLuWFV2FrxwbZyaYAhQgWqqYGKZTcr PthWLg1iwEK8WpaSWgk+0FYeLbIBPQeKlhWRSfHBtvJoYy7A2omdGFCXkUdnxQfbyqPFEviMYgcu oFGl8UnxwbbyaHEMcQDOq0uqDWQD4qT4YFt5tAiBc2ri9bKS2FpxwbaaDSDLfuHZp1/4j66g3w2X egspR8ytE1IRlmRWfLCNnFjqFDg3Rshce46yvWxWfLCNnFjqI1eGimNwVpRt4bPig23kxFJPYQwz 5dpriU1RK8EH2siJceUx7Hu7U09NRpmdFR9sIyeWOpvrzMvDQmJrxQfbyIml1gIRZ16VYNy9FNiT 4oNt5MQ4+YYRKbnm/Yy2ElsrPthGTiy1EgqXUTQiJpCchWtWXLCtIv4n2QqcnBp+rSL+pzF6o47g gwWhgyylJsUH28qJtRiYi1fLEiS2VnywrZxY7ew8aHT1H+FtZH49KT7YVk6s1nFOaynLtM0ykU+K D7aVF6s0ruDTGAeJrRUfbCsvJof0JKdRPFZx/VNNXNLGVriWCCAHOMyKD7aV46rIvipFTHy1NFBJ WSs+2FaOq8ZAhXi1LGUxNSku2FZx/RP1gGK8uMCeFB9sKy9GNTSg2Nly5Shn1JoVH2wrL0ZjnmpE SDXHXGSWNik+2FZejMoYkMYGO0dqcnLfWfHBtvJilILoBqqwteKDbeXFCAMfUyix55Tk3Iiz4oNt 5cWIa1MRuWim1GNX17ZWfLCtXFrpoZRYCGqvtcicfFJ8sK1cWmkBY+ulIFedVa16UnywrVxaodBq TZgyxih7msyKC7ZVxP9UCifl04/M0ibFB9vKpZU8GvRLPiwktlZ8sK1cWsEwwiRU2jccSGyt+GBb ubQCYwpfXi1L2XQ0KT7YVi6tjLFZuRP/k2R40UnwgbbyaLmH2M8PQT0pPthWHi1z5ZLr8o16oSJH 386KD7aVRxtjbOuYzBgAuhxrPSs+2FYeLZfAfqRmYEMCqlF4UnywrTxazoHTcUSuZ5UkO0HPigu2 VcR/9p2hnYdmqUSuFR9sK4+WuWxONUIc/Q9ksJBZ8cG28mg5hsw16sS5Vm762taKD7aVR0s9ICIx WY69yXJ7UnywrTxaaiHyJUQ9wrjvI7G14oNt5dIS16kzwmFQmqyITIoPtpVLSyUQZV4tS1mATYoP tpVLSznknscU1px1qebiSfHBtnJpej4eWW5Pig+2lUtLGKD2nmLtpamOdZPigm0V8T8lCIcxeKWR DH0/Kz7YVi4Ne2idC6mKfP12WYBNig+2lUvDFipVQP5nrCW2VnywrVwa1kCZ61gjrnBJ0qVNig+2 lUtDCiVFAkS+jNUdsEnxwbZyaVi4wnGeN1Fia8UH28qlYQ7nsDfq5sCk+GBbuTRMgTOt00Nia8UH 28qlIZuSXKlAjJxdq5xcKz7YVi5thASpccw3Bamq7rST4oGdrOYCSBglqcuIzGQ1F0Aas+UlarXG Slmd00nxwbbyYlBDa1ynGCMdugyKPys+2FZeDCg0Xhz+FLZWfLCtvBiUsJ86jUY7kcyvJ8UH28qL QQ61jAbQRFGPtp4UH2wrLzai22DJna9f4gtZYmvFB9vKiwGGGlNpo2rRVGv4pPhgW3kxgECNsyxY lqoA04oPtpUXGxOA1k4MV6KajmpWXLCtZgPg4xnOo2xVY8Kk+GBbubTYOCkDVYxYqqpnTYoPtpVL izWc5g5McqKqWfHBtnJpI4hT7Mi1yFoqqESuFR9sK5cW2YslHLdsK6mowrPig23l0iJ7MYIe87Is yg8rxQfbyqXFEYOwZq5tlKw6qGjBB9rKo8UxiUnnopkvXtTUWvHBtvJoEcJx3hZsiloJPtBWDi3G 0HPMqbUKuSpqrbhgW80EkGT8sh+1yZnBGfkw7D1wfTljLDRCQqtGV6X4YBv5MOwtQCLKpRNWWTLP ig+2kQ/DXkcsaELEDlF2kJ4VH2wjH4adAv+dftXtM6X4YBv5MOwlnGcOlGE2Z8UH28iHYc8h11aw cr6VSCVyrfhgGzkx7CmUWjtXnQuofuGz4oNt5MSwYzjNAMsL1e1FKT7YRl6Mc+kR8Jxr7JG6GuEz Ky7YVvH+sY+x1qcHSGyt+GCbubQYIleoAHKLiZLGlooPtpVLaz1AoRE+N5KKRTkrPthWLq21wH+n X9VLVyk+2FYurdUxsgNyrzEWGZRxVnywrVxao1CoAmWobL1VIteKD7aVS2slnCfaatKuTIoPtpVL azk0rl1SaxllE8ok+EBbeTRmi8iV6jYipJSJWio+2FYeraUArYw2/li7HHs+Ky7YVvH+sWFYYjHu AylIjzYpPthWHq1BKJi5pkFjfEOV2FrxwTbzaGM6b6glp1amRK4VH2wrj1Z7aC2NaZcwg+wMPys+ 2FYerY5G4V6p5gyNQGNLxQfbyqNV9t2n6BHq2p4UH2wrj1bZd4+xmDX1pgL7zYoPtpVHqxSoVK5Y Fmg1yQbESfHBtnJptbADxUiNM+uiE7lWfLCtXBrDRa5kpRExpKl7IpPigm01FwDWHFCEzZDYWvHB tnJpI7Z0HDWsZamwteKDbeXSKoaKp4esgU2KD7aZS4PQS2ZPghi7ajedFB9sM5cGXL2knCMtUydq bKn4YJu5tBEaBgtfRQD6VtCk+GBbuTTqgQg7AluDpG7zTooPtpVLozZmMS+UIhYZaWASfKCtPBqz QaGMubQxIFNTS8UH28qjEVc34hjAVssIviuxteKCbTV7ABJXN84/0pFPig+2lUejEjqOqNIt9ZRU hqYVH2wrj8ZwwFQ1AtcxM2lsqfhgW3k0yiETttg7sPdWZ1srPthWHo1SGH2QKC1LWRGZFB9sK4/G cBES9cbFM6SqsaXig23m0TAsc6RCp4oyROus+GCbeTQIpcXUIFdIqthWgg+0mUeL4dQenFQfpUnx wTbzaDEA51fxsNDYUnHBtpo7AEsPufTDr6TWgg+0lUMrI7xXhFjHQE05RHlWfLCtHBrDRcoFCLDH NGFLxQfbyqGVGviYUslQSlbd5yfFB9vKoRWuY7WcO/Sqb3VqwQfayp8VdXqdzqiVCyslHOJGc+VV ek8t+EBbebCSA2UYM1OBDuQ2Kz7YVi6spNCp8WpZKmyt+GBbuTCGQz6fJcWUuR6lsaXigm01OwAW DCNS9jHykcTWig+2mQ+DkZRLTJ0NblTYWvHBNvNhEFJsPcaCSRdYSvCBNnNhY55crGy1OLdW0Erw gTbzYFGB+sBZea3cQypcbej7pSCdFB9sKxeWuYoYM1FCGPPLSWyt+GBb+bA8qogYuaYU+UtIY0vF B9vKh+UxdgepxQyoJv6eFR9sKx+WKXDlkFNy6lHfzJkUF2yr+P8D7jiofCw1tlR8sK18WC6jhz92 olqgy4ahSfHBtvJhOYfWay8dWiLVmW5SfLCtnBjDsd1qsQPFFIvGlooPtpUXy4l9Zm6IiV0JKmyt +GCbubQUYjrH79LYUvHBNnNpyKXz+SGxteKDbebSIDRIFIcdA3WjdlJ8sM1cGgSMI8+CEqtqLZsU H2wzl8ZV5wGWaulJDTmfFA/sbBX/n+EUqQ+clRdLPfCH507IZ07Ocz0rPthWXiy10GLpdQDq9u5J 8cG28mIMh5D4Ch2Xqhq9Myk+2FZeLNVAvDj8yYbfSfHBtvJiDMcn8/SrsaXig23lxRKFXBIbD76I VWjZWfHBtvJiqYTGV24qy1I2JkyKD7aVF2O4U4yEKCccmxUfbCsvlnKo0BoSZx9N3cKbFBdsq/j/ Aw4ypbxfFI0tFR9sM5c2YhIS5dFkUNUQtUnxwTZzaSnEyHl1q6k21et7UnywzVwahpxLQb5+AdRg 40nxwTZzaSMYOGdatVeI+trWig+2mUuDkLCkCBhzg66xpeKDbebSYqjnKTzkna5J8cE2c2mR61ml jWDZTTWYacEH2sqj4RhZW2KFyrUNdQ97UnywrTwawwFQzwVi1e1lk+KCbTUDAGIL53gYqLC14oNt 5dEYLuLoQ1aIqx1FY0vFB9vKo2ENuTUoQFy9VBWRSfHBtvJoSGE0lZVMsXedyLXig23l0RiOnVDs OaVOciKyWfHBtvJoWNiA4jEao2xJmxQfbCuPxnCHICCVouo6Oik+2FYeDXNoo0dd4epG6+psa8UH 28yl5YC9H2exAY0tFR9sM5eWQq3Eq2Upa9uT4oJtNjcAw2EpXNXoJWUVNn1SfLDNXBqG0WQEPTKj ugM2KT7YZi4NA4ofjS0VH2wzlwZjvswYqeMIHy2xteKDbebSIMAYvETUkGseGlsqPthmLi2GY9BN zKrddFJ8sM1cWgzQOKceN7CLGmc9KT7YVi4N+jLPdUqNKipPPik+2FYujeGgttj4H16DxpaKD7aV S4PG53S0JmT23Wr0z6S4YJvNDsBw0M4PjS0VH2wrlwaV8+s6JtLkeofK0ibFB9vKpTEc9FxqhFRq rhpbKj7YVi4NxqzmXK9tfUxros62VnywrVwaw/Hf6VdjS8UH28qlwZjMPY74fLWRPtta8cG2cmkM h2OwJtWq7vup132QzRzamL++jPiqFSArq6IVH2wzh/ZirHjwjxWfzWYGgBTYfGZKWEBFX9WCC7TZ vADMlsSPppaKD7aZP8PQKCbgshn0dHST4oNt5s8wJLYiLZYUu5oXYFJ8sM38GYSObL96Y/uphjJO ig+2mT+D0Vu8sgHsKalhypPig23mz2LorUeIy1KV2lrxwTbzZzEUPMU+yhpbKj7YZh4thkiFODmx K1E39CfFB9vKo8UeKI7oya33oqY6mRQfbCuPFsdE0DEhVS6kVLk9KS7YZjMDxBZEIGF1trXig23l 0hhuBNMonGPr6CJa8IG28mixhtqRV8tStphOig+2lUdjuJRTBuSiqvcJWyo+2FYeLVI439dTIzsn xQfbyqPFMZDxGD4ZSWNLxQfbyqMxXIyttEQjDGvV2FLxwbbyaLGMme35tDaMoPqaTooPtplHKwGQ wcp+qbGl4oNt5tEyW5I4ZiBjXxKVWdGKC7bZzAAMh6Wc4kprbKn4YJt5tBQaAtezYoldzeczKT7Y Zi4tjfaylpit5TphS8UH28ylYehlwDWips2pVnywzVwaBr5+R1MCdUJNLQQfaDOPhgHiqeGoaGqp +GCbeTQInICpjlilXSdxrfhgm3k04EJqTHBBSXcr1oIPtJlDi4EdN1uwuKwktVZ8sM0cWgwZaklU Us6qm86kuGCbzRoQoyL1gTPyYdB7KC3zipciIevXfZCNPNhAg8rVxsxHNcle4rPig23kwaC3UEut lHotIB33rPhgG3mwAZe4GhNrTi3K6XxmxQfbyIVBr6GPiRNzwq7G8s2KD7aRCxtwZdQlOOfi4gg0 tlR8sI1c2IAb7dyFqKYCE7ZUfLCNfBh0CmM2VACuzWRFrQQfaCMXNtgS9Agtx6wqGrPigm01ZwD0 EvZh4lOmLmeJnRUfbDN/VkKBntgNUWsztlR8sM082mjp5uVhobGl4oNt5tEy51tcZaakehfq132Q zfxZDolzrTb6EBI1DS0VH2wzf5bYhZ0eWWJrxQfbzJ+lULiK02rsVOuELRUfbDN/lgKU1ssIMZ3S hC0VH2wzf4ah1tHXJiUunFXhpRUfbDOHNjpF50p8VnusTWNLxQO7WM0XoGY0cprEqFjNFwAdApe/ I+Is1UiqbNaKD7aZD4OAqYx5ASj2MmFLxQfbzIfF0Lg0qrHWEQtGYmvFB9vMi8XAmROvliVobKn4 YJt5sRhi7/Hwp6mF4ANt5cRa5ypFGpMClAayu82s+GBbOTGGY78BgBkpyu42s+KDbeXEWgucUada e8Gq8vFJ8cG2cmIMR7Gwz4ylyGnOJ8EF2mqugMF2CsxI8jbtrPhgWzm0VkMj6pyIO6oeZbPig23l 0BhuYnUCtPJiTAQps8XtmHqtmlUqPthWXqwR15BHDJAx47OcA2JWfLCtvBjDZfbWfLl2Pq+gsaXi g23mxijETJw5EtYeq8aWig+2mRsrgThrLmw/oCpXogQfaDMvVkLCBiMy3Vhqaqn8Ruz5lUf9Ej+7 /rTaPb1dlvzssFvT0/fbm2/nZzfb68936/uny+vt/ROv3/0fUEsHCOFDg/T/JAAA8fMBAFBLAwQU AAgICAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEwAAAE9iamVjdCAxL3N0eWxlcy54bWyNlEtugzAQhvc9RUTX 4EBaqbHy2PUE7QEc2xCr4EFjA+nta5uCSJtEXoK/f94zu+OlqVe9RKNA75M8WycrqTkIpat98vnx nr4lx8PTDspScUkF8K6R2qbGftfSrJxYGzo+7pMONQVmlKGaNdJQyym0Uk8iuqRpcDX+CcZi5QFe qq282FixZ6+07BTvOcBLtUA2xIo962q6lJcQK76YOi0h5dC0zKo/UVxqpb/2ydnalhIyDEM2bDLA iuTb7ZaE1zlgPnNth3WgBCeylt6ZIXmWk4nVXXOSGJ0es+xfZ0xfRXe1r+6kx88Mo/sb4OsWbUR8 izbiKnyOqo12PdJLPQDM5faCcfBD0Yv1+oWM3wt6eIgPqKzEBc4f4pzVfK4CNLcGxHE5cUQqe9/+ iUaf9F3LrwRlC2jnQMr4xXfVKeaxPdumvj+2/nVCKxTiJurC2RA3wm740l7J4flqrx/Xf0sClKx+ 79HiBroYg0tqkWlTAjZuLP3TrzGXl8lCvqm3GyyOVtwGFcRtqyUgygJFmbmP5DCdz/FqksOO3L6n hx9QSwcIxJ7dQp4BAACPBQAAUEsDBBQACAgIADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARAAAAT2JqZWN0IDEv bWV0YS54bWyNkj1zgyAYx/d+Co9mlUcxQ+TU3HXomqWZe5ygpVXwAKMfv4gxTXodOsLz4/8CFMe5 76KLMFZqVaIUJygSqtZcqrZE57fX+ICO1VOhm0bWgnJdj71QLu6FY5E/qixdRyUajaKaWWmpYr2w 1NVUD0JtR+g9TYPRujN3Un2V6MO5gQJM04SnDGvTQprnOYTphvL6xg2j6QLFaxCdWBwspDiFjV0S /jfUwt5H0lrfjBZ8DR3sSJLsYV1vdGs47/4q4NkMfELmWHyRYnpG0bX+3YUTFAUB6gxTttGmZy6M rno+qsWhQrxECcKriq9LYLadA80bYniD/QJV21stpaoiVGuFEoY5baqTlzj9tMkw2Z2VnKPH/ffB 6E9RO8hI0qdk9zLKjsf5/pAV8EuwgAc7+OujVN9QSwcI9J0lTDIBAABmAgAAUEsDBBQACAgIADar 3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUAAAAT2JqZWN0IDIvY29udGVudC54bWzNXcuS2zYW3c9XqJQ1RRJ8q9rK IlXxJp5NZqpmyyYhiWO+AlItab5+AL4EoAmZ3fEt0K5yTNyLx7k8BM6ppJGXX29FvnnDpMmq8svW 3lnbDS6TKs3K05ftv//1uxFufz3846U6HrME79MquRS4bI2kKlv6zw3tXTb7PvpleyHlvoqbrNmX cYGbfZvsqxqXY689n73v5upbmvaeL+7eJfO9W3xrl3ZmuULf+HX5zF0y3zsl8XVpZ5ZLi8p3P1ZL O9+a3DhWtOpFHbeZtIpbnpXfv2zPbVvvTfN6ve6uzq4iJ9OOosjsotOCkymvvpC8y0oTE+eYTdaY 9s42x9wCt/HS9bFcfknlpXjFZHFp4jZ+91abt9NiRrydFKVJzjFZzI0uWXy9Trr89Top37eI27Pi nYTmNxrs/vj2x4MLpFg6F8sVSpWQrF4Ms8/m+1dVNS2Vdeg/0G65yLJcs3/msq9P068kazHh0pOn 6UmcJ1PFq2KuaDTPNmmGgd8YTSfis0I0ig7I7MNTcpMqh/7Ptz/+TM64iB/J2Y+Tjaxs2rh8VIaw l6BE6pkE1xVpp8Icl2+Y9G2haW3ntsjVnzuLjqknkqazqXQ5jkk/ffrhGW8Zvv4i7IfP+RCZXdJE 3Azn41cy5Q5w8K3GJGNI4pwRwSgaWjRKjqrec73FPZEUt2XDMUJU6VEecfo4hr7c4UZr2JVk35K4 bFgm3TJYaABL697suvdhsMk7xP0odGekhGry1qQzIpIed/RhexjPxfjSVmysxOj2sebw0u+Aw0bY t276PY5h+bL9p7WVkjbDU5GVHaQT7Zdmp6ylDLe35uHFnBnz8NIP+n6C5Gxvh4ZjXGT5nTXRDW47 djmRuD7TFde0dpi0GW427IyiQ5HqOx2grErcTcvN8Gw69Hy67omfrN9uWeWMumqy/kW05NJN+oEl buj2P7TQUyCv6LHzy6vDfm/77GOW52Pu1DClYp/9fszJFAI/4bGilKKKp8n+R2cM63aCObYalDBx qYixcynHtz76gWo6n6pmcy9eq9xo7zUdZCLldohmZZJfUmycszTFpZHgPKfcOsZ5g7dPXgcf6qvA N7cEx62Bi7q9jyPmOH7Dximux5ympiIEGxVJmShwxmaSnc6tEZenHKdGfMPN4/0vLZM7X6ahsdvf ur8a3Ff3tIJpRhcb3408fsW5iDSvTjE92s5FlkhVI5htMph+rgQnfeWGeKc3O/CvtE7f5Wrf6E7z qLb1lPlqmq+Nu96HN56n2JZO6/9sLghfE+uUGn3TVkzox2v+usQES6FrljIdaO2QlxRS7IwZ/6fg 53e9aRIrDNksM9WkQssL/bn9b4gs5JD/hEOzsYlD/sc4FPy9w6up8iz9eUfD0lWHP5H5MwtKul/v F2QqZcgQeK3S+/TQrenw0nOx+7NbxcAihHaWG4w0GjmKKLkQa+zs5P5MMFWvu93I6CSPm2ZA2213 E9W5D44pknHanMqbMt3wD9xGSJ/66Slv7Gjn+/a4HlrSaBegkPuYhBkQK04fqPOKHi50151NpPXt 7Tw7swwqB0+Ux2lKMMPx5xnjFu1+Q/vxb1GwGf76dWr8GgXjIvrNpbqQhJ6ucdOfHqwgVX4pygmL tXNdDgl9HJ+G4tvhLgiRXHza2jWOyNixMR1XVA738vY2LqaHWFOlHJO7cZsvlDuNlsRUa1aEkfFj Fel4+FjR89Xd51d3/9HqTiRLZ1M8iXtF/N+KKJbUYMLt6sIw/jjMW5xfcGM8AT/75t8zf5y040Rd USk/qYSaSiVMzVLkcwvtFzf2usZ5PrvQ4MHsY15VZDYp5Mad+H946d9r9+fwjvsOeUXNt9HbOSGL nk0x1WpGz99GjPWNbKKP9Vg0zGzqMDaprlKAtkiD0tdHW5jqqt8N3ceklskmsvc/nPV0Q87K03Yc 6PBbt6jNVzpe3zA3sPluYXP1mcWwBNWCdfZqM0sVn+uB7uHeUwhL5qTki9utEKGHu0836cevQL0k 8SM6yB0/WOGfUTVWFh+mLKH1mCW0NGF7XtNPY4ucncP/eswpRzThDmFw25ZA2QfVD3JEE+4ICDfi yEwf9KCzgcA5Imc5pFJEE2wo3K6SzO4ayGwjINw+T2ZfF5mfs+nz6AIlm4NVsNkFwh0q2Ryugs1A 6gtZHJvpgyZ0QCIK2So2yxFNuIEEFkIqNssRTbiBBBZyeTa7utgMJKOQp2SztwY2Ax24yFeS2V8D mRGQwEK8BUS6PCCCequRkszRKsgMJLAcpQeUI5pwAwksh/eAji4PiIBklKM0gXJEE24ggeWIVs/n cEsRTbiBBJbDm0BHlwlEQDLKUZpAOaIJN5DAcpQmUI7owQ10JLm8B3R1eUAHSEa5Sg8oRzThBhJY rtIDyhFNuKHYzHtAV5cHdIBklKv0gHJEE24ggeUqTaAc0YQbSGC5vAl0dZlAB0hGuUoTKEc04QYS WJ7SBMoRTbiBBJbHm0BPlwkE2po9pQeUI5pgAwksT/kvAuWIJtxAAsvjPaCnywO6QDLKU3pAOaIJ N9RXrPSAckQTbqj/DIs3gb4uE+gCyShfaQLliCbcQALLV5pAOaIJN5DA8nkT6OsygS6QjPKVJlCO 6MEN9l+KKsm8Cg/oAQksn/eAvi4P6AHJKF/pAeWIJtxAAitQekA5ogk3kMAKeA8Y6PKAHtAeFShN oBzRhBtIYAVKEyhHNOEGElgBbwIDXSbQA5JRgWj1XA6qFNGEG0hgBUoTKEf04Ab7mRPhh040kdkH klGh0gPKEU24gQRWqPSAckQTbiCBFfIeMNTlAX0gGRV6qq1ZjmjCDSSwQqUJlCOacEPtzcIPBOoy gT+o6ufRRUo2R6tgM5DAipQmUI5owg0ksCLeBEa6TCDYj7eqyCxHNMEGEliR0gPKEU24gQRWxHvA SJcHDIBkVKT0gHJEE24ggRUpPaAc0YQbSGDZFu8C2ZMmfEBCyrZEt8djFSOacAOdSrYluD3h8gEx ogk32KULrsBnXUYwgLpcwfKUfPZWwGe4uzSUdPZXQOcQ6toFKxTorMsJhlDXK1iRks7RGugMdfGC eAUMz2cpogk31MUL4uUw2m6HCaHklHQLDI/VWQOfoWSWeAuMwGd3DXyGklni/TDaLogJoc5d6R4Y HmuwBj5DySzxHhiBz+EK+Ax3dZd4d5cmOkdQcgop3SBagxuMoGQWUrpBtAY3GEHJLOGKGFvbHTER lJxCSjeI1uAGIyiZhZR2EK3BDkZQMku4JcbWdk1MBCWnkNIOojXYwQhKZjlKO+iswQ5GUHpDuCfG 1nRRDNxVoSoyO3/LC8otjdh0GO/1Hq7vH+/8lx77m/7HJ/n/13f4P1BLBwjJQzHnzgkAAPBvAABQ SwMEFAAICAgANqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABMAAABPYmplY3QgMi9zdHlsZXMueG1sjZRLboMwEIb3 PUVE1+BAWqmx8tj1BO0BHNsQq+BBYwPp7WubgkibRF6Cv3/eM7vjpalXvUSjQO+TPFsnK6k5CKWr ffL58Z6+JcfD0w7KUnFJBfCukdqmxn7X0qycWBs6Pu6TDjUFZpShmjXSUMsptFJPIrqkaXA1/gnG YuUBXqqtvNhYsWevtOwU7znAS7VANsSKPetqupSXECu+mDotIeXQtMyqP1FcaqW/9snZ2pYSMgxD NmwywIrk2+2WhNc5YD5zbYd1oAQnspbemSF5lpOJ1V1zkhidHrPsX2dMX0V3ta/upMfPDKP7G+Dr Fm1EfIs24ip8jqqNdj3SSz0AzOX2gnHwQ9GL9fqFjN8LeniID6isxAXOH+Kc1XyuAjS3BsRxOXFE Knvf/olGn/Rdy68EZQto50DK+MV31SnmsT3bpr4/tv51QisU4ibqwtkQN8Ju+NJeyeH5aq8f139L ApSsfu/R4ga6GINLapFpUwI2biz9068xl5fJQr6ptxssjlbcBhXEbaslIMoCRZm5j+Qwnc/xapLD jty+p4cfUEsHCMSe3UKeAQAAjwUAAFBLAwQUAAgICAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEQAAAE9iamVj dCAyL21ldGEueG1sjZI9c4MgGMf3fgqPZpVHMUPk1Nx16JqlmXucoKVV8ACjH7+IMU16HTrC8+P/ AhTHue+iizBWalWiFCcoEqrWXKq2ROe31/iAjtVToZtG1oJyXY+9UC7uhWORP6osXUclGo2imllp qWK9sNTVVA9CbUfoPU2D0bozd1J9lejDuYECTNOEpwxr00Ka5zmE6Yby+sYNo+kCxWsQnVgcLKQ4 hY1dEv431MLeR9Ja34wWfA0d7EiS7GFdb3RrOO/+KuDZDHxC5lh8kWJ6RtG1/t2FExQFAeoMU7bR pmcujK56PqrFoUK8RAnCq4qvS2C2nQPNG2J4g/0CVdtbLaWqIlRrhRKGOW2qk5c4/bTJMNmdlZyj x/33wehPUTvISNKnZPcyyo7H+f6QFfBLsIAHO/jro1TfUEsHCPSdJUwyAQAAZgIAAFBLAwQUAAAI AAA2q94+9/opwtwDAADcAwAACAAAAG1ldGEueG1sPD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIiBlbmNvZGlu Zz0iVVRGLTgiPz4KPG9mZmljZTpkb2N1bWVudC1tZXRhIHhtbG5zOm9mZmljZT0idXJuOm9hc2lz Om5hbWVzOnRjOm9wZW5kb2N1bWVudDp4bWxuczpvZmZpY2U6MS4wIiB4bWxuczp4bGluaz0iaHR0 cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMTk5OS94bGluayIgeG1sbnM6ZGM9Imh0dHA6Ly9wdXJsLm9yZy9kYy9l bGVtZW50cy8xLjEvIiB4bWxuczptZXRhPSJ1cm46b2FzaXM6bmFtZXM6dGM6b3BlbmRvY3VtZW50 OnhtbG5zOm1ldGE6MS4wIiB4bWxuczpvb289Imh0dHA6Ly9vcGVub2ZmaWNlLm9yZy8yMDA0L29m ZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6Z3JkZGw9Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDMvZy9kYXRhLXZpZXcjIiBv ZmZpY2U6dmVyc2lvbj0iMS4yIiBncmRkbDp0cmFuc2Zvcm1hdGlvbj0iaHR0cDovL2RvY3Mub2Fz aXMtb3Blbi5vcmcvb2ZmaWNlLzEuMi94c2x0L29kZjJyZGYueHNsIj48b2ZmaWNlOm1ldGE+PG1l dGE6aW5pdGlhbC1jcmVhdG9yPkV2ZXJ0IDwvbWV0YTppbml0aWFsLWNyZWF0b3I+PG1ldGE6Y3Jl YXRpb24tZGF0ZT4yMDExLTA2LTMwVDIxOjU1OjQxPC9tZXRhOmNyZWF0aW9uLWRhdGU+PGRjOmRh dGU+MjAxMS0wNi0zMFQyMzoyNTo0NTwvZGM6ZGF0ZT48ZGM6Y3JlYXRvcj5FdmVydCA8L2RjOmNy ZWF0b3I+PG1ldGE6ZWRpdGluZy1kdXJhdGlvbj5QVDAwSDEzTTMyUzwvbWV0YTplZGl0aW5nLWR1 cmF0aW9uPjxtZXRhOmVkaXRpbmctY3ljbGVzPjE8L21ldGE6ZWRpdGluZy1jeWNsZXM+PG1ldGE6 ZG9jdW1lbnQtc3RhdGlzdGljIG1ldGE6dGFibGUtY291bnQ9IjMiIG1ldGE6Y2VsbC1jb3VudD0i NDMxOSIgbWV0YTpvYmplY3QtY291bnQ9IjIiLz48bWV0YTpnZW5lcmF0b3I+T3Blbk9mZmljZS5v cmcvMy4yJFVuaXggT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmdfcHJvamVjdC8zMjBtMTIkQnVpbGQtOTQ4MzwvbWV0 YTpnZW5lcmF0b3I+PC9vZmZpY2U6bWV0YT48L29mZmljZTpkb2N1bWVudC1tZXRhPlBLAwQUAAgI CAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAAAAFRodW1ibmFpbHMvdGh1bWJuYWlsLnBuZ22WdVyTfffHB4K0 oMQUJLxVFIShdEqLiKQ0DKRzIyWkkQGCgoCCtIADBlJSo3WUjC5BwjmJ0Tm6fhs89/N7Pfft/rn2 uq7v63xPfM77nJdaGip01KzUAACATvWhkg7h2QMAkAAoSQn/POd+TgEAQHJVJXldn7TldD+57p2T 9l54Z4c2jyoox5JSG0plUsN3UHtBKN5QR1VMt2Ju9lIyw6WUibE+5xxIlaitaAek4xvEEtTfkKOa 3rPsfT99cD4gxnDjKKAHtyVT0s65j5fI7J3f2q/PxHn0+Prfv88pk/y4TeHNSRC+AgzIvvMth/tY yhf/kbNOynvIyo3ftDm73fT1qAub1MbDL7DYHVCpw1/RG5NcdS/z4t9xmHzGeIHzGyw6HyH2rqNx 9KsNjd+HMplk0Ya1cNQNuwNOmbcwfqq7mAYzhlKLB7ikRumCXn63jB3/xT12UBv/7oFAoTn3rtsx 3qpYKkEaQmeWB+PO2h+DbnQseFOj3sI3Oj8nlgQqmw+gl7bkU4vXx1zJej8FVLcgjdxTx+Pmfho4 0INx4+lUByUxajoXV806Ks4VUrAOgzVdTybcYvA+y3faleWPmjdCTKtsOikDA3zptwUO5iPur24h +LseRdUYvd2ZsJAr1HmJ3bRk7BWBYmpL9uzCAmbmpSZvjcv0FO/5aCI9cegc0oX+5GjJvE6DtLkf fm9vGvgISTxtnqyqf9TQsXhdfaSBs/eK7If9FJ+2RIZtu8L8mczIIqkoNWvpBQfZLd4oakmoZbuE +exc0e1F35UYF7+9loc0xYXUCdXzgx4r2xMv1xWNRX5EPX7TcFIWAVz8Mr/hfasCfWStkB1i0u7U JLuIc3wmG8Hm/6XJGTIXN1b1bGdlkjEG4z2UYw/rFSn51XQoduVVzvN1Q5sRw6aKJaXHR6jW5YC/ Pgn1yM40tes7b2tyO2vxnaxn9KXQoW1YoOmbXIJaP0INWlcXpxAcnNLFl1gNf7Bqs1kM+7Fc1TP3 4ysIfKn9zvHevl7A8ORo2UrHIf5cca4z9gjjAWuVVVFmLxRB+DoC1xHNPVQFdGw3Jpjku0sqrk5s t8EdX+DCE0Tbnu1O7TRdnThO3BmenMWqh4xk5YNuHaJa1xEJ/KOfcDhUQwk53I8J1jSV6bK68CVv 4RWbj1WOu5z5fVCmbsmugh5Xu2WFt2aTwato46EbNk3cZAfsfVZXtsCXV8VGEZicsmZ+oe1GIYG2 Jsey1jcQK+De1q8yahBL1NbYBRpKTo+1bReOr4F6zJugCYkAwSm3pHtVGyqbLVPp+8xog49mnp/H NnSyEJ18mA4QS5ppQ5Uijo8Kt+qBSfP4HWK5V3B0MSKcn7osJ2N7P3lTb1MnHnxCm5JQkv/IZ3UI fPAyHa8RByPfWsVDm5piT8BiH72f+AEdOnoP0Le4P/XRmKfpCUN5TTCoDqv+V9E1ZezAsEWZtbqt NefZBvpq+Eme+wv1asj1d3fKFoFP8KhkuH1aQROvXawldnll/I7s816LURNGCK1wYtOmX5Vj8hIo Vo9f18ZFH3+7sxc5IWMdr3L0gOvg99ur1x+lD2P1Aqg4J++6botmhUJHt9jt5gej2bvoONzIazBm hV7OE6V7v42i9vL+UvQLMthdNvxxZHlu22rPeF9/69z++vRqQMwkiG1fyHsgqmrB5VHU14VF1eG9 pd3ZcJKAVqQ1wm7u3VQ2h4h7CXfQFR4O7OUKwV+l4ldFCzspLq5nQHijHekynaeT18T5qu5rZnZb eky7wAWPQE/++m2nE8tKpaOn2VkeK44s+7WE3fIA8f2Uqj2mM+BOQI86J7rv+VWJKbehmeE4D+uh J6o3dWYMmDoGdTQiRJ8vwDoGh3LP5eER71sds2+u53SBfUOLFxlHQxe9Y++/n275LjZkVy6xBf8s zsej1qbvfy4eKK+uuuioNKRCkg3c2BsVRFhaxOwj33Qydn5LdXLOskgle7DAlgjOx1BGXN9nFcW3 6ghsXT8Blcx1rhX9rFTZJBOa6BoVqRYK4vXzWtvBjg9G2Mwc8KRoQ0fz8i4xb5aL+d+M+8YZLx2k ryJqvbv9UX7vSjsvfCoREd9mO+xCYVRiQyFWe19aYbimXHMquNHZlPbVY7gN6cVomxsFPn9Bm3EL 1YG+R6/zV4cNpaUykfRFLbd0mhYHjcuCO9bo/YIYWd1VSwqePP19uXtYPVxgjp2JNV5RprY1J1C5 t8XBZV6m24itfgdxU9NWauBVZ7zutH+VZPZSeLr5wuV+oyBH35B++/E6NHOCdG6F8eX6OeBK0djX qAxk7vJHZdKy5xaFikvkmh+Xz4vsxX1Y0Wirlqm2dWa3QR/jPCNV2sxjBBIXJiGqSqMu8RtG/asZ qqYG3bVbExlXaYtfFgQGOGKVh1ChFvIZRcViNfP5Nqh3nT7IicM28x+hZf6pZGiTqfv1Bl8r/ce/ Pyy7qBvwbmLo9rCU0v5Ao+H5BhalH2Rd6es1MG32Qs2nh4Yq2BQkUnaPW2/mFo0JQnRpu9FuQP/J ptTOsifPPXuL3Fdibs3oGGtzp/bxE+nFXvgt1nhbe5kKdcvftTo/YAkY073pEnn/Ag0h33WaYxtT a/Zb+8Zkez7swgXFjrKyiLrGudnORRelY2TGsy/zsucifV80HtpUHUZQiEDKuRfVNrLwIRtBUwMU WvRFkg+PPks261kpS+Ret9x+rdVTVJOPmT+C9dNh7kbOsGV6GczSbngrpsaJGpRHAwuB3I1+s5pO SR+4zSXPN6AEq3m4X4PjBcHTsoMROsq5LrmzEI28Y3BN0HS0Uy49dElZT7bd/0aZa1BrwjcsndZi umm4cxaCQy8ALKzROZGr8pa3sW4THtCh5iDkOY9Lft1EfyKpKKHncW9j9+A+HVuVRaCndJm7f4B3 OXMA1Xk854QT0jGzrTIlZWNGd69l41tRC2/6NxKIuym1zX1oIX0NYrbR0ZTyMq+UMd1apuvtGev5 grJlcbTRwOcEhBg3uU/Tfvmt5n5jwihNU7c4qN1drbB/xCGcKobIDM+/QhcjK777zGBg8bC/TcTR Q5zFagQa2DHguuuyvSXJlmg1e7V2vEY56MFrsfzMLD+R6SB6gDYjMLBa0r61xsGoXYYvc+bTOuY4 UiCBNmpMstxSsRkvisngxyd0yRkHCkq6avI0FQ94GRk/nbS1D+goYG1XNiqfW31xcd0uzFkj8wtZ kN/CJLPckOEDrwwa8MpbdN6xRHXe0wc6Y0j0Wwk/jzFgYW6JbzGr/cdlQQwgecj5cEzXrrO+L1aA Ja2DfAQoAYpKcSrJDTCDfu+tD3cZ1NgLIJEbwnfVGa0vyHahHXkdxzxFrReTva2ZWRIjx0Z5cjkN IivB06lfIWJfftQv4fcnpVdFlnnL2Z6HDRCsoVMWH0FHRkuiaD6p4R93c14ZxjAoDbFasFVC9Iz0 7zC+wyQ1DmMK5sLcazel9sdAy3RxTOyxUbW/q6DwQuWt3gKOLLxyTPRnW5lBDW7nK9FO1qhA0Cfg JCCbm+eY55qt0/dku9DLDe9bN5cVQgME4RNlhUCkfpp5fto2zqEOLZYjeUtyqT3KYqbzhWYM1XWC U0nrfXteUWWu7jyRUoMey5SNOTtzbx+ay8rMl86YRfUCumJZqxtMpi9Ufws3T2Lfrbf4zHaPju04 EjziwRZEyNC4T6ltd/3PkIPY/G6LwKE3JxfvOlKqPx1iSAEwiLA/QfolGqc7zlXL4DAjNqT5rl/l eCcurasUBGYFUwNpw1CvV1FCON4DGCmvqRwDdfWPE1WYxAcU7BzCNWk3mcOsaElM9HmtSJjBRV7T u/a3TT+bM3xAKb8ne0CXRfWKVYERkJ1rRe1dncklD/e4TrFxEgBZfkGw+xHFX8ymMDcRog4Whrl9 QJET7EEkDb2ShOdMAc3NCjAaah0sarAm3xVL8AeWE6ivHpGDgjNOPkEOqqbTkOoiKRO+5F8TDtFW tCeVG/J8jA0UXe1Av2nufQUL5YhzUGOXM/WhYgZdHmIq9lxTSfWivycBlF7VSW7JoiHDhpx6ULls z8PzkH5dlSfF/Qu1Qo8WNjS0r+p3hITBrlBCjOTNmtX6pbhfZE9dXlMDL3xEgYVV3leJ3+x+rPtz 0k/0jeYHQq4+uLGsxFwvrzRQU5ODRd89jfiySBg3QEm9nQn0bLZouuMi/cjQvITRYFcl2LhcDkZz fouGR/yyLVRyvJkqUjeH+EYH68V3/Nw3Yzz7nmyLvn3dp9lQaiDDa+oR/NfGhJvvclWlNGceOm9O ku4DxCmjTp2hi/1ZFgQqlDQxNVq4cM2OiehLlitCoplxsEL3Mc2/nVkpdsjL3ZvZnnOCDshy9bRf aAFy6CKfcjGvTMW1Vp6XLn7Ysup83sLzNiELIbpIl/GRFTUXTPd0Gzq5w0Cl2J2s1EQRRkO5wTdx cIuztKg2tVJ0sISxowJsSAyKQgcLyuiVqRpdpLGKs9ZNE3ijSX7mUkJjSkGDsTFBPWGqRM0Ri0bC 5SiZ67oTVt099CbzFQWhSg9hB782rNT3OnzOrtdn/pqykTBP0AVZlitMQuCbZi5BNRcc7bCgAPlA QaLnfVpIwpH1f4tNzAY9s9XhO5yd7WHAvp1u3E+hYHUm6wI4zaUq1ehY2E0No6cU1+z4dJHBXMyg ZzRCFsc/XT41eBu5EuLZJMRDuWXyfti0G/l7mpl6ppSJIP1884cWrKvfIQlmiV2crMzE4Hyvkcc2 S1Xo/6n2K1BMVNhaTnYVKv4CSUdWjA8LKH0uERXgcxD4ta/0XEZrnBkuqjVGlOEB5Wn4483HMVvo myQ42M2el+wktPQ0zKDblDCTdzW7WFQF3i30rVFHTSNbGkn9i2wU7MX+ctexVRU37+HIWHvVoCzZ APC0+yaK/Na9bCkHLP+3wxEeK8WGGw0taZBflw4QfgYMmCLt0zQHjdsldY162vtjC2queOfCxuXF nejO/Gn3LVV7vDRQ/13zEYzU1xyQHU6QZBjKhgZ9nrxkx8Wbx3qlchvg3kboVCodbDh5pRQraxIq oWJLYwV9iEUQiyrMBD0cKTa+A1f+Z5HOURvo4Cc//92tdcAh59DvxBC+ibPfH6vwi+yo+eWbtGJj Dhghvp0zuuB5+6xRP2Pw8w507GiCTlDyu3dx1EG2A9p5N3bAYjj7Ba02okiuqsqP/X4rLKTt6+1C DxyckHsakIUif9G4tcSuwtpbT040+U8tDiZWHMCzMNtaILaX1EBqAp0SHutt0ZATO4RpheSOosc5 myYtotAVsCtEKnxcfm7GqIt05WIurvuVtytu01TWP1h0rT6KoF95RWz8USiAGYS68b91yPRNKnFC 5qMyvoX4Q0a+Xz3TOtzjfD6oQOsvjsgRFPwi4Vj6J2fIjZaibkAwUfLU3rO/N3bbTFLlCRavPoRJ 3RQbK1z/bpvv6qC0w7RyufLsy//f9XdUXhVcz3pyxIc7MGrsgIkdilgWgMKyfUjedbeNakUgJZQu liU4RNq4r+YFxI5wiME9XIWGS56DX3xnhUKa8fe0C8DPSdoYQLFh/5W2IXRUbgbvzJUpt25PcllY Y5c7Tz5YhYaB+5S/OeF9ZMH58+9R8Io/As/Ja3SRfdyzKoKRAfHgP+y9vS8p2Qvpf89peacCrO8h f5paaCeTrABCWH3Ml1fFMnWVpY/ii7zWaZZXLmDuCUl8WnB2s0FIhaVpE8jwIhz1rpkz431ukaMZ 57/nwUqav2WBOTS2cZb76Nxv/yU5f6z8KWtZGkxMnb5MRSkd9tgyPIggPdN7Zcl4I3578jH0U1qy /7NpXhVAnQjx5l5Uw12U+gS6oM7ISehIMu7x+DsRmjOXur5rTinWN95lUX3Quke6p0ucl6zUYvOF CGO+XPI/gAnilmrFesos4rjjnJHpe/s3/pzMOBA8sskXeE3F31DvLKCA07cG5U+52sMx5oY3e3aG RoK0HNGaRJlbXCKyhlhzQGRKDM/EMqPAzRs4veioHvCzUW9HZU7K11mn12TCejRHufnvsySK24Sw h6WVaWFJQ3WRQ3DJsD2/prLtnzZf+70sus8RxDW0koaL6xOQnYpKMLj9tlkn35UkK9eVDq7pMik6 b9NxmKVNLF4KUGdNvF7Rr7UC8KcpXOIJ3tXWNrFQjQie1lKRpknS8FTDsjQ+0borvBRs5/ZxpMay LIcu7KLCaTGMd5Yh7NU3ftWXtkiUXQ/GWmShYGQIV80rss+Rd/kD0rhs9N2LV8/bAVYJ4xb7wUuq /KsypuQV9Unldtkynj4EDztNuveiWX36ldCKy/+YeUZB/OZ/Ah/980xQctl83y5Kz0No5TFN9QvX 76wE0hByv+zNDra0TJqtDNThZfp2QMpwKgNm6MpuzYvQkYPqOibBHWM/gITVmacytI9Ez7fA125A GhLqBIN8Fogio4OxnVQWbjs6UOW7XvyfHglGwd9IS/zGpkjK4Np3oA5nzGKIb28XTV/GWrdCFCIE CWJ+ygAMbLj3n/5I6cs6VYkSvWYa39/d4TcCfhJxNgirk+usTkz1n1UhPw8FzOVfa5JfJEyPu7uE XSA/c/bXvsK/phP0+zSrXtNylqnoJULZWZlBPwSYiDDSQlqfUu68CIzYfSrj5A3cxEmX6+p3tPnE X/H/IUeaI48t2PrTHnb867nE31v/jzPSDRNIR5qtjUV/tJ0ayZU0mYUF+pcpSTOUwNSuE+Bbs3xe PDUp3awpFceOIf+yVko4rQDGxmR4BUGGmKuf3QHzI8eKP/kSez4FVdl46d7RfxdkFZjardo8V29w 77AXTwnVv8keSy9bWAuCjulQAMSsCLWhVsBeGmnlTxD3DOGSPgPw9DO3Iq5pWmYQ1xATtHgSUIbY qEUmyVxKAywR5SKvjh1j46Cn1jUDep+tfSH9H1yHi6P/FL2tupBBajiAsDC8Aepw5VkEn9JOry6f lPY/i9XR7nTumDIz4CqZ8mkH9CSvheyRJergFL5dIec1fSp827TbYfYPHb66n9uwmjSeU1KjehIs zinFYO5zmtbxqMIoJzof07hIzA9a1JzWKV0gdMuh2/DqVVt3q5mu6cLrBhKko0XEMThmhPSV8aPa 1Z/sNk6dH3lpPQYqMvpw9uHocRAd3cY+yvDGFWYczfQTEqI79uMIVXP1YS/+Eop/Z7ecW8/hjEeE dbWa6r/7m/rZwkbrSL2T2EtztskRascuXW+Pv3/GMqKCUpz+CTOi+V3ZD3o4TeaQ0l0A4aeqrKFU rPA09P8AUEsHCOod2T44FQAAPhcAAFBLAwQUAAgICAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAJwAAAENvbmZp Z3VyYXRpb25zMi9hY2NlbGVyYXRvci9jdXJyZW50LnhtbAMAUEsHCAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAFBLAwQU AAAIAAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi9wcm9ncmVzc2Jhci9QSwME FAAACAAANqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAABDb25maWd1cmF0aW9uczIvZmxvYXRlci9QSwMEFAAA CAAANqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABoAAABDb25maWd1cmF0aW9uczIvcG9wdXBtZW51L1BLAwQUAAAI AAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAAAAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi9tZW51YmFyL1BLAwQUAAAIAAA2 q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAAAAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi90b29sYmFyL1BLAwQUAAAIAAA2q94+ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHwAAAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi9pbWFnZXMvQml0bWFwcy9QSwMEFAAACAAA NqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABoAAABDb25maWd1cmF0aW9uczIvc3RhdHVzYmFyL1BLAwQUAAgICAA2 q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADAAAAHNldHRpbmdzLnhtbO1a33PaOBB+v7+C8TsBDMcVT6BD6OWSa67N AEl/vAl7AU1krUeSIfSvP9mGTOLYiWOstml5YrCkb9er3U+fZB2/vfVZbQVCUuR9q3XUtGrAXfQo X/Stq+lp/Y31dvDHMc7n1AXHQzf0gau6BKV0F1nTw7l0kua+FQruIJFUOpz4IB3lOhgA3w1z7vd2 YmPJk1tG+U3fWioVOI3Ger0+WrePUCwarV6v14hbd11d5HO6KGoq6X3fFCLeGYoGJM7Exuxms9NI /lu1rZP3QmNbg10cdq8/ON4aSH7qVIEfxaa2fRy51re0SWdFYX0XNStr3MMx11TSGYOhADLFwNo1 qk2gGylX1qB53HgM8iLgC5grM8ifqKeWWdCdXrfT2hv+DOhimem6bXd67U5RA3WfBHXKPbgFL20M 1tnTFI/RCSY2RVyG9bmX8lMqoXPAGkSNhUMRW41AU35OiQ7Jc44+HDJZAqhWgRQchUKiuERJla6A z5nTWW4qHyJ/yUJutXrlsM9Q0G/IFWGTgFH1H3qQnoAlij2yHISirin0lPe7EFVZpff9N4A/dBVd QYw+JnyREx67HPjO34qZawc7zqOVPXGrZfAd6gkqhX6FwF8R/alGqTSjI9BrwsI06rbKy8aALCAi 0CfRuyXBJ0tc/yNomrhniAwItwZKhJCNnPHw6fXiSZK2qyHpVtsYS3feHEj6QNIHkj6Q9G9L0u1q SLprTkkfKPpA0QeK/rUpuvlbUXRec3xAUrS04qOTnLOZ5Ixkb+pxBTI2IyL3OMz+6/Wk2E+rAiID JwLIzaWA6Jg1L93mhMmcfCti5isIjP2XL8/nIvgfUJmCLleEzyFHqCNkKFLQDKMSatndtm3/WVLX PJhXA1E5I1K7Hvp8jOszIB4IM0ZiItFMYwD9XH4MFaMcJht/hkxOIL3kVmJkwkkwxTGRCtITXUVl JcDncnu6b8zCGKSe7/wzktJMnIbP1uB7wk/CmUdXVOa6XxF4lRuIc5nAD2+pnGy4uxTI6Tf4fmpg +2Enu4MEVfzjXfIgFCSa4Jd8xRsypnlMawr1L85GhLvATNToexB8KCnhlyF3VUgytiJVVNIF5TdX gUcU5O/XSp41xjHSqQgqTEv8GZHQ7ZxQTsTGavzgijEtBIxW5DAI2OZKgnhHFHlty51pRfC6lwmT WuwCiTfWGgk52xjS1oa0r3lxYVwfbYnxg/6TvVctwIjmtgCjJRHE1f6N0A8EyIixKt+WGtLq+Zc/ TlHMqOcBv3u9/a+CXBC+CMnjY7zCkzjCMLJUevw1EVogpLcIxcefwIJyrQDKv8Hf3Hty/L4y7/la /S4bpnfbG2gTnTz5ancvzqlKWD9naRgqHBHmhkxrPgNLOlnBdXK/7iMfMZQmGDoRrKcC/Sn4QbkX yd1ANB7dB2zk3ZQc/A9QSwcI2Cck4SoEAABrKQAAUEsDBBQACAgIADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAV AAAATUVUQS1JTkYvbWFuaWZlc3QueG1s1VfNbtQwEL73KaIcektMc0LpZivRqogDQkLljGadSdbI sV173O6+PXbLdgMssBtiIW62Nf5+PDNOvLjaDDJ7QOuEVk1+Ub7KM1Rct0L1Tf7p7rZ4nV8tzxYD KNGho3o3yMI+5V6mTe6tqjU44WoFA7qaeK0NqlZzP6Ci+vv4OjItz7I9cCckFiHQbrM9GbYCCtoa bHIwRgoOFHSyB9WWT1zlmKJ0xiK0bo1I+R5kZK4aLXdeysIArZuc5ewkKYQbYsHPYTSuFUU1MeA0 3LHFTRGt6a4THIu+FQMSxP2XjyIYfnSfO20HoHjWzfm913T59ubd+xB0G4KeFw7L+7D6gpw+opHA MR6bY89L2cX/Jbc6Ue7R+LNWg6OtRDehGH4Pu0sZm15tRxKkNhAr5S975RfXAV+DpT+wp/BUpU5K lTgp1T9NSjVvUiZaOQx2t/bDSoGQjtFuWBrVzw0+C961Vp3ovX3Kh6sYcI4Sw1Rbxr210yr0dK4k BMbq3qJzK0hE0EkNhKnUa+NN6AefBj4iJzsY0lomAxcD9OjYG0EDmER98I0jCbYjID+lKH+8Op1X sTlLL0o+5jhOxry/MEgUngMvn5sF++k1sPwKUEsHCONAAG/LAQAASAwAAFBLAQIUABQAAAgAADar 3j6FbDmKLgAAAC4AAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABtaW1ldHlwZVBLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j4t Z2hbpmUAABpqCAALAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFQAAABjb250ZW50LnhtbFBLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j6q r2svBWoAAOgNCQAbAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNmAABPYmplY3RSZXBsYWNlbWVudHMvT2JqZWN0IDFQ SwECFAAUAAgICAA2q94+cxiQ56QcAAAQKgIAGwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACB0AAAT2JqZWN0UmVwbGFj ZW1lbnRzL09iamVjdCAyUEsBAhQAFAAICAgANqvePp3z0ZISBgAA3xkAAAoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA bu0AAHN0eWxlcy54bWxQSwECFAAUAAgICAA2q94+4UOD9P8kAADx8wEAFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC4 8wAAT2JqZWN0IDEvY29udGVudC54bWxQSwECFAAUAAgICAA2q94+xJ7dQp4BAACPBQAAEwAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAD5GAEAT2JqZWN0IDEvc3R5bGVzLnhtbFBLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j70nSVMMgEAAGYC AAARAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANgaAQBPYmplY3QgMS9tZXRhLnhtbFBLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j7JQzHn zgkAAPBvAAAUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEkcAQBPYmplY3QgMi9jb250ZW50LnhtbFBLAQIUABQACAgI ADar3j7Ent1CngEAAI8FAAATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFkmAQBPYmplY3QgMi9zdHlsZXMueG1sUEsB AhQAFAAICAgANqvePvSdJUwyAQAAZgIAABEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOCgBAE9iamVjdCAyL21ldGEu eG1sUEsBAhQAFAAACAAANqvePvf6KcLcAwAA3AMAAAgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAqSkBAG1ldGEueG1s UEsBAhQAFAAICAgANqvePuod2T44FQAAPhcAABgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAqy0BAFRodW1ibmFpbHMv dGh1bWJuYWlsLnBuZ1BLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j4AAAAAAgAAAAAAAAAnAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAClD AQBDb25maWd1cmF0aW9uczIvYWNjZWxlcmF0b3IvY3VycmVudC54bWxQSwECFAAUAAAIAAA2q94+ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAQwEAQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbnMyL3Byb2dyZXNzYmFy L1BLAQIUABQAAAgAADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALpDAQBDb25maWd1cmF0 aW9uczIvZmxvYXRlci9QSwECFAAUAAAIAAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADw QwEAQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbnMyL3BvcHVwbWVudS9QSwECFAAUAAAIAAA2q94+AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAoRAEAQ29uZmlndXJhdGlvbnMyL21lbnViYXIvUEsBAhQAFAAACAAANqve PgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAXkQBAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi90b29sYmFyL1BL AQIUABQAAAgAADar3j4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAfAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAJREAQBDb25maWd1cmF0aW9u czIvaW1hZ2VzL0JpdG1hcHMvUEsBAhQAFAAACAAANqvePgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABoAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA0UQBAENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25zMi9zdGF0dXNiYXIvUEsBAhQAFAAICAgANqvePtgnJOEqBAAA aykAAAwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACUUBAHNldHRpbmdzLnhtbFBLAQIUABQACAgIADar3j7jQABvywEA AEgMAAAVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG1JAQBNRVRBLUlORi9tYW5pZmVzdC54bWxQSwUGAAAAABcAFwAE BgAAe0sBAAAA --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA97planckkasaran_-- From general-return-3969-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 21:43:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6E3A66E4 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85488 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85434 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 21:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85426 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 21:43:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:43:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:42:55 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:42:33 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:42:33 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: Abhishek Mehta , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:40:15 +0200 Subject: RE: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Topic: Hadoop Java Versions Thread-Index: Acw3biTCPQz0yvRMRFOO80O3HF/alAAACfbg Message-ID: References: ,<93245D75-B596-4AC0-9733-BB2FF4E458E5@tresata.com> In-Reply-To: <93245D75-B596-4AC0-9733-BB2FF4E458E5@tresata.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 That's not a question I'm qualified to answer. I do know we're now buying a= n Arista for a different cluster, but there's probably loads others out the= re. *forwarded to general@...* ________________________________________ From: Abhishek Mehta [abhishek@tresata.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:38 PM To: Evert Lammerts Subject: Fwd: Hadoop Java Versions what are the other switch options (other than cisco that is?)? cheers Abhishek Mehta (e) abhishek@tresata.com (v) 980.355.9855 Begin forwarded message: From: Evert Lammerts = > Date: June 30, 2011 5:31:26 PM EDT To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > Subject: RE: Hadoop Java Versions Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. But -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with Cisco -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports useful) -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a re-replication of every block in the rack. Keeping the amount of disks per node low and the amount of nodes high shoul= d keep the impact of dead nodes in control. A ToR switch failing is differe= nt - missing 30 nodes (~120TB) at once cannot be fixed by adding more nodes= ; that actually increases ToR switch failure. Although such failure is quit= e rare to begin with, I guess. The back-of-the-envelope-calculation I made = suggests that ~150 (1U) nodes should be fine with 1Gb ethernet. (e.g., when= 6 nodes fail in a cluster with 150 nodes with four 2TB disks each, with HD= FS 60% full, it takes around ~32 minutes to recover. 2 nodes failing should= take around 640 seconds. Also see the attached spreadsheet.) This doesn't = take ToR switch failure in account though. On the other hand - 150 nodes is= only ~5 racks - in such a scenario you might rather want to shut the syste= m down completely rather than letting it replicate 20% of all data. Cheers, Evert From general-return-3970-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 23:18:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FEC06E7B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97594 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 23:18:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97324 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 23:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97316 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 23:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:18:22 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so2879053wwi.29 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:18:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.237.136 with SMTP id y8mr526602weq.76.1309475882246; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.1.79 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:18:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.126.69.120] In-Reply-To: References: <4E086BC7.5000208@apache.org> <9068C5A7-6090-42A3-8891-F60EF3B660BD@navteq.com> <918BB6E5-EF4B-4EB2-9B55-8BCBAF6DBA7B@navteq.com> <4E09A60C.1090605@apache.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:18:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Java Versions From: Aaron Eng To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd519f0cda22904a6f61c30 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd519f0cda22904a6f61c30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Keeping the amount of disks per node low and the amount of nodes high should keep the impact of dead nodes in control. It keeps the impact of dead nodes in control but I don't think thats long-term cost efficient. As prices of 10GbE go down, the "keep the node small" arguement seems less fitting. And on another note, most servers manufactured in the last 10 years have dual 1GbE network interfaces. If one were to go by these calcs: >150 nodes with four 2TB disks each, with HDFS 60% full, it takes around ~32 minutes to recover It seems like that assumes a single 1GbE interface, why not leverage the second? On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > > You can get 12-24 TB in a server today, which means the loss of a server > > generates a lot of traffic -which argues for 10 Gbe. > > > > But > > -big increase in switch cost, especially if you (CoI warning) go with > > Cisco > > -there have been problems with things like BIOS PXE and lights out > > management on 10 Gbe -probably due to the NICs being things the BIOS > > wasn't expecting and off the mainboard. This should improve. > > -I don't know how well linux works with ether that fast (field reports > > useful) > > -the big threat is still ToR switch failure, as that will trigger a > > re-replication of every block in the rack. > > Keeping the amount of disks per node low and the amount of nodes high > should keep the impact of dead nodes in control. A ToR switch failing is > different - missing 30 nodes (~120TB) at once cannot be fixed by adding more > nodes; that actually increases ToR switch failure. Although such failure is > quite rare to begin with, I guess. The back-of-the-envelope-calculation I > made suggests that ~150 (1U) nodes should be fine with 1Gb ethernet. (e.g., > when 6 nodes fail in a cluster with 150 nodes with four 2TB disks each, with > HDFS 60% full, it takes around ~32 minutes to recover. 2 nodes failing > should take around 640 seconds. Also see the attached spreadsheet.) This > doesn't take ToR switch failure in account though. On the other hand - 150 > nodes is only ~5 racks - in such a scenario you might rather want to shut > the system down completely rather than letting it replicate 20% of all data. > > Cheers, > Evert --000e0cd519f0cda22904a6f61c30-- From general-return-55-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 02 16:06:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 10736 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2008 16:06:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2008 16:06:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 53281 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 16:06:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52942 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 16:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52847 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2008 16:06:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:06:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:04:57 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.112.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m92G3o8i068717; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer; b=cB8S+Ltt26xWkMJFqFOqxtQ5C3ac1kL/1FoU6sqlBmAqJpoayAW6q6BCt7jGtpDz Message-Id: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Hadoop Camp next month Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:03:50 -0700 Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I'd like to remind everyone that the Hadoop Camp & ApacheCon US is coming up in New Orleans next month. http://tinyurl.com/hadoop-camp It will be the largest gathering of Hadoop developers outside of California. We'll have: Core: Doug Cutting, Dhruba Borthakur, Arun Murthy, Owen O'Malley, Sameer Paranjpye, Sanjay Radia, Tom White Zookeeper: Ben Reed There will also be a training session on Practical Problem Solving with Hadoop by Milind Bhandarkar on Monday. So if you'd like to meet the developers or find out more about Hadoop, come join us! -- Owen From general-return-56-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 02 16:30:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29843 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2008 16:30:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2008 16:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 97382 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 16:30:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97365 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2008 16:30:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97354 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2008 16:30:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:30:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:29:08 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1177456wfg.2 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:resent-to:from:to:resent-from :subject:references:message-id:content-type:resent-date:mime-version :date:cc:x-mailer:sender; bh=BNAPIMLdyEQarWnSgm4lrfTxUJW1YKgvifPZ2GnEQNQ=; b=Hq04usDVjSSxR9CgdTCGZmxhKJ5qdnB1WXquaOc2u0NMvg/KPLgNxbGiDa9TsYqSQb 4H2V5lGr8SXG4n+iri40dFJu1wJZfjWCiZDzA5wvOBZqs+78jg/RXzhx7llBEQMOmvMo zZ/aPzA7s58CeBJS1vMW035jYlL70evLygJoc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=resent-to:from:to:resent-from:subject:references:message-id :content-type:resent-date:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer:sender; b=JLSuyX8D9Uqxg22if2UEzfJJSg62ZsYWVraz3bziLASx/33khMTNTBcY9/Qlq6vdPx 32wtbzDdnxMXwOUTbL4CUiJE/xvU8/SpvXNUOmbmfPE9qszJ19tNV5owangU3YbPQl9+ JbtBUYxtY/MftYfWtBDAxdk43Mgugl+xKkzZ0= Received: by 10.141.88.3 with SMTP id q3mr5484456rvl.3.1222964973116; Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.fw.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f42sm8372497rvb.6.2008.10.02.09.29.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Resent-To: general@hadoop.apache.org From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Resent-From: Owen O'Malley Subject: Fwd: CFP open for ApacheCon Europe 2009 References: <20081002082206.GA8370@infiltrator.gizzard.com> Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--155364869 Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:29:30 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:59:39 -0700 Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Sender: Owen O'Malley X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Resent-Message-Id: <20081002162919.A8A46724956@athena.apache.org> --Apple-Mail-6--155364869 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, The call for proposals for ApacheCon Europe 2009 is out. Note that =20= no paper is called for, just a presentation. The description of the =20 presentation is due on 24 October. -- Owen Begin forwarded message: > If you only have thirty seconds: > > The Call for Papers for ApacheCon Europe 2009, to be held in =20 > Amsterdam, from 23rd to 27th March, is now open! Submit your =20 > proposals at http://eu.apachecon.com/c/aceu2009/cfp/ before 24th =20 > October. > > Remember that early bird prices for ApacheCon US 2008, to be held in =20= > New Orleans, from 3rd to 7th November, will go up this Friday, at =20 > midnight Eastern time! > > Sponsorship opportunities for ApacheCon US 2008 and ApacheCon EU =20 > 2009 are still available. If you or your company are interested in =20 > becoming a sponsor, please contact Delia Frees at =20 > delia@apachecon.com for details. > > ******* > > If you want all the details: > > ApacheCon Europe 2009 - Leading the Wave of Open Source > Amsterdam, The Netherlands > 23rd to 27th March, 2009 > > Call for Papers Opens for ApacheCon Europe 2009 > > The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) invites submissions to its =20 > official conference, ApacheCon Europe 2009. To be held 23rd to 27th =20= > March, 2009 at the M=F6venpick Hotel Amsterdam City Centre, ApacheCon =20= > serves as a forum for showcasing the ASF's latest developments, =20 > including its projects, membership, and community. ApacheCon offers =20= > unparalleled educational opportunities, with dedicated =20 > presentations, hands-on trainings, and sessions that address core =20 > technology, development, business/marketing, and licensing issues in =20= > Open Source. > > ApacheCon's wide range of activities are designed to promote the =20 > exchange of ideas amongst ASF Members, innovators, developers, =20 > vendors, and users interested in the future of Open Source =20 > technology. The conference program includes competitively selected =20 > presentations, trainings/workshops, and a small number of invited =20 > speakers. All sessions undergo a peer review process by the =20 > ApacheCon Conference Planning team. The following information =20 > provides presentation category descriptions, and information about =20 > how to submit your > proposal. > > Conference Themes and Topics > > APACHECON 2009 - LEADING THE WAVE OF OPEN SOURCE > > Building on the success of the last two years, we are excited to =20 > return to Amsterdam in 2009. We'll be continuing to offer our very =20 > popular two-day trainings, including certifications of completion =20 > for those who fulfill all the requirements of these trainings. > > The ASF comprises some of the most active and recognized developers =20= > in the Open Source community. By bringing together the pioneers, =20 > developers, and users of flagship Open Source technologies, =20 > ApacheCon provides an influential platform for dialogue, between the =20= > speaker and the audience, between project contributors and the =20 > community at large, traversing a wide range of ideas, expertise, and =20= > personalities. > > ApacheCon welcomes submissions from like-minded delegates across =20 > many fields, geographic locations, and areas of development. The =20 > breadth and loosely-structured nature of the Apache community lends =20= > itself to conference content that is also somewhat loosely-=20 > structured. Common themes of interest address groundbreaking =20 > technologies and emerging trends, successful practices (from =20 > development to deployment), and lessons learned (tips, tools, and =20 > tricks). In addition to technical content, ApacheCon invites =20 > Business Track submissions that address Open Source business, =20 > marketing, and legal/licensing issues. > > Topics appropriate for submission to this conference are manifold, =20 > and may include but are not restricted to: > > - Apache HTTP server topics such as installation, configuration, and =20= > migration > - ASF-wide projects such as Lucene, SpamAssassin, Jackrabbit, and =20 > Maven > - Scripting languages and dynamic content such as Java, Perl, =20 > Python, Ruby, XSL, and PHP > - Security and e-commerce > - Performance tuning, load balancing and high availability > - New technologies and broader initiatives such as Web Services and =20= > Web 2.0 > - ASF-Incubated projects such as Sling, UIMA, and Shindig > > > Submission Guidelines > Submissions must include > - Title > - Speaker name, with affiliation and email address > - Speaker bio (100 words or less) > - Short description (50 words or less) > - Full description including abstract and objectives (200 words or > less) > - Expertise level (beginner to advanced) > - Format and duration (trainings vs. general presentation; half-, =20 > full- or two-day workshop, etc.) > - Intended audience and maximum number of participants (trainings =20 > only) > - Background knowledge expected of the participants (trainings only) > > > Types of Presentations > > - Trainings/Workshops > - General Sessions > - Case Studies/Industry Profiles > - Invited Keynotes/Panels/Speakers > - Corporate Showcases & Demonstrations > > BoF sessions and Fast Feather Track talks will be selected separately > > Pre Conference Trainings/Workshops > Held on the first and second day of the conference =96 2008-03-23 and =20= > 2008-03-24, Trainings require a registration fee beyond the regular =20= > conference fee. Proposals may be submitted for half-day (3 hours), =20 > full-day (6 hours), or two-day (12 hours) training sessions, aimed =20 > at providing in-depth, hands-on development experience or related =20 > continuing education. Training submissions are welcome at beginner, =20= > intermediate, and expert levels. > > General Sessions > General Sessions include presentations on practical development =20 > applications, insight into high-interest projects, best practices =20 > and key advances, overcoming implementation challenges, and industry =20= > innovations. Especially welcome are submissions that extend =20 > participants' understanding the role of ASF projects and their =20 > influence on the Open Source community at large. General Sessions =20 > are scheduled for 50 minutes and are accessible to all conference =20 > delegates. > > Case Study/Industry Profile > Practitioners are invited to submit presentations that focus on how =20= > implementing particular ASF technologies led to improved products/=20 > solutions, service offerings, changes in work practices, among other =20= > successes. Proposals that highlight overcoming interesting =20 > challenges in application design and developing innovative =20 > frameworks using multiple ASF projects are particularly encouraged. =20= > NOTE: Marketing-oriented submissions aimed at promoting specific =20 > organizations or products will not be accepted. > > Invited Keynotes/Panels/Speakers > Each conference the ApacheCon Planning team invites select =20 > presenters dealing with engaging, dialectical, and challenging =20 > subjects to present in keynote and/or panel formats. Topics include =20= > cutting-edge technology development, industry leadership, hot or =20 > emerging trends, opinions on controversial issues, insight on =20 > technology paradigms, and contrasting viewpoints in complementary =20 > professional areas. Those interested in suggesting a candidate for =20 > an invited speaker opportunity should submit a brief proposal with =20 > the speaker's name, affiliation, background/bio, overview of topics =20= > of interest, and contact information. > > Important Dates > Please submit your completed proposal, at = http://eu.apachecon.com/c/aceu2009/cfp/=20 > before Friday, 24th October, 2008 Midnight GMT. > > About ApacheCon 2009 > ApacheCon is co-produced by the Apache Software Foundation and Stone =20= > Circle Productions. The ApacheCon Planning team comprises ASF =20 > Members from all over the world working on a wholly-volunteer basis. =20= > For more information, visit > http://eu.apachecon.com/c/aceu2009/ > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- --Apple-Mail-6--155364869-- From general-return-57-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 06 23:35:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74743 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2008 23:35:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 39033 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39012 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79145 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2008 22:34:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=Z2ExU8eDUh7QyfRAQU/bMTgDXDzYbEHL7sHVbRw94ljIoxUJi7HLmUOERcyK4K8e X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C92803.7328F78D" Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:32:43 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AckoA3LHD+ivlQt4Ro+OiDvaGryK2A== From: "Olga Natkovich" To: Cc: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2008 22:32:44.0741 (UTC) FILETIME=[73AB9F50:01C92803] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C92803.7328F78D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pig Developers and Mentors, =20 Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. =20 As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. =20 I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. =20 I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the open source community. =20 Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. =20 Thanks, =20 Olga =20 PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig community only. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C92803.7328F78D-- From general-return-58-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 06 23:35:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74794 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2008 23:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 39173 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39156 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86885 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2008 22:42:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=N7Xmlz5Klrg0/uEdAYmnPaYxHrJzwK7JXcrkyPYtmWqN64WLftF0/W8rjwXYs0ME X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:39:21 -0700 Message-ID: <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AckoA3LHD+ivlQt4Ro+OiDvaGryK2AAAOSeQ References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> From: "Santhosh Srinivasan" To: Cc: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2008 22:40:19.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[82B94550:01C92804] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Santhosh=20 -----Original Message----- From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:33 PM To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Pig Developers and Mentors, =20 Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. =20 As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. =20 I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. =20 I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the open source community. =20 Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. =20 Thanks, =20 Olga =20 PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig community only. From general-return-59-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 06 23:35:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74839 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2008 23:35:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 39440 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39325 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20556 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2008 23:11:38 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luckbr1975@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=fEVt6DsHwR+qEcw9g+umAuekU5ZqfOYUchZ6zOogQEA=; b=jwSpTgGalBYOCsJ2YtmK+1AwrqzaGOMB8+l3mwEHy2uXTB4eE52H0gL0QTWrW5UFuJ g11nQw1mxzvI1F08/SS6EP0K01hKTcN4U52QUYi5XdtnkH10IzYz8/K7NxsBqz/oZ7E5 j6fQivKPosgLfw8PV4ZZhQ4GLpL1sqEkaDxBI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=vbeEiU7ynttBZtWIJ44mFg7kSJaWqets1Nr2anotVQp4gEmDzekbCFkNTOcctyc9Jc RVKdpYiAjGQrqWr/gZwrCD3yi/TwetOOGD3H9OeSBj5y6qErkd5SYj4cEDlsLpxDrRVK gUnNCa/3+x6WRB+VaJXrG5N8Y5IKsy1UGA0TE= Message-ID: <5a75db780810061611x2651cbf6p41bf8e41d73675e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:11:11 -0700 From: "Luciano Resende" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, Has this list been updated recently ? Does it reflect the current list of committers ? [1] http://incubator.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > Have you guys looked at the "Creating an Open and Diverse community" section on the graduation checklist ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ From general-return-60-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 06 23:36:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74935 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2008 23:36:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2008 23:36:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 39518 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39503 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2008 23:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28375 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2008 23:25:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=Yy1fd0xvq+uBnP5elRarrIcqSvXYzP3cc+ZnVJaIzHCA6Ft0Lf6zaiqz3OOFqjgR X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:23:48 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF90B@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5a75db780810061611x2651cbf6p41bf8e41d73675e8@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AckoCRzumdo8rIGfSZGY0mAZEymE4QAARdKw References: <5a75db780810061611x2651cbf6p41bf8e41d73675e8@mail.gmail.com> From: "Olga Natkovich" To: Cc: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2008 23:23:50.0040 (UTC) FILETIME=[96BB2180:01C9280A] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1975@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 4:11 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Graduation Checklist , was Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation=20 > to hadoop subproject >=20 > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich=20 > wrote: > > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period=20 > of time,=20 > > we had extended our community with 2 new committers, >=20 > Has this list been updated recently ? Does it reflect the=20 > current list of committers ? > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html Yes, the document is up-to-date. >=20 > > > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as=20 > described in=20 > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > >=20 > Have you guys looked at the "Creating an Open and Diverse community" > section on the graduation checklist ? Yes, and I think we satisfied these requirements. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 >=20 From general-return-61-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 07 01:18:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29951 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 01:18:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 43710 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43592 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43581 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:18:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tang9527@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.30] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:17:11 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so526821ywe.29 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nU2HUMztGDqYFrq0YKj00IUAn3Aoa02S5UN2OxUgBCc=; b=n5b/5d4k8hCUetjr9AqH4Pwr3WIaMp9x5Xte4qD+J/YYA6+QRd2BGx/8e5E4YQeQRf Sl1txS9G1niFuu1lEFDy/NnOU7kVFxUe6KXsnyK0cH5Fs46TJ+A/LcQ3F7fJF+ARABgK Pk1s1px3COnjhdXneriQtVknNdHK7bWmNjBAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ex40uPzZvQW3//Up57tK/6au13SZDBbjf+5Ym2hCLGp8wVgzkCmhstV1sAad4IFRrv 9Yaw2OM/198ADeZ5ieu/DEhtZGUr8u2WFecQdmWDZzFZ7daLxQzxyhxo+sHjuYa+VLpT wHqznMpIxJFdn5YE81QuIy1pZbCoOmM/MSebE= Received: by 10.110.26.20 with SMTP id 20mr8237026tiz.29.1223342248227; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.17.1 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98fa49780810061817r2a471964n8bf43d9d88c64651@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:17:28 +0800 From: tang9527@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224" References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 2008/10/7 Santhosh Srinivasan > +1 > > Santhosh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:33 PM > To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject > > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. > -- jim ------=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224-- From general-return-62-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 07 01:18:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 30309 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 01:18:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 43783 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43749 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43736 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 01:18:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:18:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tang9527@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.30] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:17:48 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so526821ywe.29 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nU2HUMztGDqYFrq0YKj00IUAn3Aoa02S5UN2OxUgBCc=; b=n5b/5d4k8hCUetjr9AqH4Pwr3WIaMp9x5Xte4qD+J/YYA6+QRd2BGx/8e5E4YQeQRf Sl1txS9G1niFuu1lEFDy/NnOU7kVFxUe6KXsnyK0cH5Fs46TJ+A/LcQ3F7fJF+ARABgK Pk1s1px3COnjhdXneriQtVknNdHK7bWmNjBAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=ex40uPzZvQW3//Up57tK/6au13SZDBbjf+5Ym2hCLGp8wVgzkCmhstV1sAad4IFRrv 9Yaw2OM/198ADeZ5ieu/DEhtZGUr8u2WFecQdmWDZzFZ7daLxQzxyhxo+sHjuYa+VLpT wHqznMpIxJFdn5YE81QuIy1pZbCoOmM/MSebE= Received: by 10.110.26.20 with SMTP id 20mr8237026tiz.29.1223342248227; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.17.1 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98fa49780810061817r2a471964n8bf43d9d88c64651@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:17:28 +0800 From: tang9527@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224" References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 2008/10/7 Santhosh Srinivasan > +1 > > Santhosh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:33 PM > To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject > > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. > -- jim ------=_Part_66805_29733018.1223342248224-- From general-return-63-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 07 16:32:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29137 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 16:32:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 16:32:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 79809 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 16:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79793 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 16:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52501 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 16:12:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=vXwK6sBV0blb3oj2SpwJdEp6Q1YClo0mutppczUsYesOgRi5FStbLqSATEgkhOeW x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:11:48 -0700 Message-ID: <11ED50FC7C760F4EA9F44109C531617D019501BA@SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <98fa49780810061817r2a471964n8bf43d9d88c64651@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AckokWODheRuxH8QRnWAs2HP+eM8fwABf+2w References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <088A0B616C8C1D4787DD686C6922A72AD86118@SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <98fa49780810061817r2a471964n8bf43d9d88c64651@mail.gmail.com> From: "Pradeep Kamath" To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2008 16:11:15.0121 (UTC) FILETIME=[52CE8A10:01C92897] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 -----Original Message----- From: tang9527@gmail.com [mailto:tang9527@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 6:17 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject +1 2008/10/7 Santhosh Srinivasan > +1 > > Santhosh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:33 PM > To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject > > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. > --=20 jim From general-return-64-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 07 16:33:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29400 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 16:33:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 16:33:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 80764 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 16:33:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80744 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 16:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95932 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 04:14:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daijyc@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.28 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:cc :references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer :x-mimeole; bh=qKI4H0tukL5kbkxGXcdH/TJeX5hM5p/oyU3kFx9YY/4=; b=eUBs6hzqB3lXTdJFXM+4pwOxbPhUlAfm40VVLPpWJa3FeA0lU605cfcyqQUZFMUVnR KAE4MjEKW4l3NPGowAIjiXlMIAWOvGePoqrF0AeLsi+sMfmVXfHREgG9q2fvmwIF3uUL 6VZQW95twQ6s8tilCyn/qzFLv9bjACEY6+Jlk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=Drz11jtJor0EIaTYrBivheGmOkKP/XObnl015uX9MTaD1k4LP/QREhT5t7b9qE5/VI 4dA11dqvNBWWHTheUzSoAU4nfmuPhG1w6PiU0y2eqQCAvZELoX08Flxe8VTyDv/NBIOx pGYvej6Pmq6iL5e2xiM3AEtbDdMh4XfDd9oB0= Message-ID: From: "Daniel" To: Cc: , References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:14:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Daniel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olga Natkovich" To: Cc: ; Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 6:32 PM Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Pig Developers and Mentors, Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, we had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring benefits to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and easier entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the open source community. Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. Thanks, Olga PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, no action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig community only. From general-return-65-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 07 22:33:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 30423 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 22:33:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 22:33:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 35548 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 22:33:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35523 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 22:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35293 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 22:33:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:33:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:31:57 +0000 Received: from wlan-c-214-208.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c89.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m97MV1Lq042120; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=D3xOLQc3dXo1Zpyt9KE6A0QudwjdDtlxCnr3k7y5Y4K+TT9Ab0weGBS4M3ix/KQT Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:31:00 -0700 References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, > we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring > benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and > easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, > no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. From general-return-66-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 09 18:48:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 88654 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2008 18:48:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2008 18:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 46306 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 18:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46163 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 18:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46107 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2008 18:48:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:48:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:47:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.198] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c52.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.52]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m99IjT9Z064599; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:45:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NVO0ssXzyrR1PF8FuAxcx7y1rvE13rJ+n+F0XWaj5BTX5X1/+Ye88pOqz9XTzvUR In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <390EBE2A-F32B-4DBC-AA8C-2AB63ED89935@yahoo-inc.com> Cc: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alan Gates Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:44:48 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Alan. On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of > time, we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring > benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and > easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; > however, no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. From general-return-67-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 09 20:20:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 22764 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2008 20:20:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2008 20:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 47769 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 20:20:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47711 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 20:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47668 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2008 20:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:20:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:19:07 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m99KHAtc035568; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:17:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=llxuGBUWLVvlLrG9G9H6pG2sTVOP5FjNvCDZ1dc+5Z/ODdeh4EQol30IurwVY3yT Cc: , Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:17:10 -0700 References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Pig Developers and Mentors, > > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period of time, > we > had extended our community with 2 new committers, had a release, > resolved 300 issues. We have made some significant code improvements > including pipeline redesign, addition of streaming and limit > functionality, grunt shell improvements and significant performance > speedup. We have a constant traffic and lively discussions on both > pig-dev and pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of Hadoop. There > are several advantages to this approach. First, this would allow us to > extend both our user and developer base. Second, it would bring > benefits > to the Hadoop community by providing a higher level interface and > easier > entry point for new users. Third, having an established project to > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature participant in the > open source community. > > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, > no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. From general-return-68-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 09 21:04:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 37044 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2008 21:04:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2008 21:04:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 8693 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 21:04:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8571 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2008 21:04:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37540 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2008 18:43:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=U1FOGzuIZtQ+ZKzkDNhCgO/hjQ39l1eFmisDrnfoDAESKrvS0nYd1lG3ETpHYxU3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Oct 15th Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:35:56 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Oct 15th Thread-Index: AckkqOob9DI4jbMCQEeTE1RcN+ztSQFk7y8w References: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Ajay Anand" To: , , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2008 18:36:27.0751 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0C3DF70:01C92A3D] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The next Bay Area User Group meeting is scheduled for October 15th at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Agenda: - Exploiting database join techniques for analytics with Hadoop: Jun Rao, IBM - Jaql Update: Kevin Beyer, IBM - Experiences moving a Petabyte Data Center: Sriram Rao, Quantcast Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay From general-return-69-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 10 17:20:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 98788 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2008 17:20:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2008 17:20:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 43683 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2008 17:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43437 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2008 17:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43345 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2008 17:20:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:20:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:19:01 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m9AHIrHf080713; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=r+5bbOgmj/+4sGgf1D8UCM1IWoPAeE8g7j3zodoNxmUNdEbRqz8TL2ACxmyXZSW8 Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:18:53 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:18:24 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AFE69@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AckoA3LHD+ivlQt4Ro+OiDvaGryK2AC+K+Gg References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> From: "Olga Natkovich" To: Cc: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2008 17:18:53.0353 (UTC) FILETIME=[44F0D990:01C92AFC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The vote is closed now. Thanks for everybody who voted! Total: 9 +1 0 -1 Pig Committers: 6 +1 0 -1 Pig Mentors: 1 +1 0 -1 Thanks, Olga=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 3:33 PM > To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject >=20 > Pig Developers and Mentors, > =20 > Pig has been incubating for over a year now. In this period=20 > of time, we had extended our community with 2 new committers,=20 > had a release, resolved 300 issues. We have made some=20 > significant code improvements including pipeline redesign,=20 > addition of streaming and limit functionality, grunt shell=20 > improvements and significant performance speedup. We have a=20 > constant traffic and lively discussions on both pig-dev and=20 > pig-user mailing lists and we conduct our business in the=20 > open by publishing proposals and discussing them in the mailing lists. > =20 > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as=20 > described in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > =20 > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. > =20 > I would also propose that we graduate as a subproject of=20 > Hadoop. There are several advantages to this approach. First,=20 > this would allow us to extend both our user and developer=20 > base. Second, it would bring benefits to the Hadoop community=20 > by providing a higher level interface and easier entry point=20 > for new users. Third, having an established project to=20 > provide guidance, would help Pig to become a mature=20 > participant in the open source community. > =20 > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > Olga > =20 > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists;=20 > however, no action is required from them at this time. This=20 > step is for Pig community only. >=20 From general-return-70-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 05:08:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 90120 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 05:08:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 05:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 67675 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 05:08:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67628 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 05:08:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67609 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 05:08:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:08:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:07:05 +0000 Received: from OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id S4ww1a0030mv7h05157Z8s; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:07:33 +0000 Received: from [12.7.212.84] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id S56f1a0022VBGtd3X56l4d; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:06:55 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=SodKoXcs9TsA:10 a=feAe3NOjdhMA:10 a=yzoYlIRGkuBQZggdGLgA:9 a=-JAYgQfiNDxMrd8BeML3K0sTzAsA:4 a=AXjVNIk09o8A:10 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:07:11 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well getting through the incubator, both with attracting new committers and making its first release. Within Yahoo, on our research clusters, the jobs are roughly broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 java map/reduce, and 1/3 pig, so it is a very relevant project. +1 -- Owen From general-return-71-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 05:14:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 91389 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 72749 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72627 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72612 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:14:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:13:32 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.5] (snvvpn2-10-72-78-c178.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.78.178]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m9D5Bj3V077222; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:12:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=XT8/iBW/PAIIimqLpfb8lOnH7Y1frbUnYl6a+hJ0FV/LogETjDwloG7MN2Gqgt1S Message-Id: <5AFD70A1-0E3C-4403-9F57-BBC921E54693@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org, "Owen O'Malley" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:12:39 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Oct 12, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well > getting through the incubator, both with attracting new committers > and making its first release. Within Yahoo, on our research > clusters, the jobs are roughly broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 > java map/reduce, and 1/3 pig, so it is a very relevant project. > > +1 > > -- Owen From general-return-72-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 09:17:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 97810 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 09:17:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 09:17:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6524 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 09:17:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6501 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 09:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6490 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 09:17:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:17:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 66.206.198.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of enis.soz.nutch@gmail.com) Received: from [66.206.198.176] (HELO Generic33.powerdnn.com) (66.206.198.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:16:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.15] ([85.105.135.220]) by Generic33.powerdnn.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:20:23 -0700 Message-ID: <48F31205.3090300@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:16:53 +0300 From: Enis Soztutar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well getting > through the incubator, both with attracting new committers and making > its first release. Within Yahoo, on our research clusters, the jobs > are roughly broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 java map/reduce, and > 1/3 pig, so it is a very relevant project. > > +1 > > -- Owen > From general-return-73-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 16:09:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 57612 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 16:09:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 16:09:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 47301 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 16:09:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47282 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 16:09:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47271 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 16:09:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:09:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:08:41 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c169.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.169]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m9DG8pm8020563 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Pi0Xt7vxFNW/XTiq6rHIGdylJjeJKf1kYe8w66FRnWWBFz5dJlVaBKZDT18e1iAH Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:08:53 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Oct 12, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well > getting through the incubator, both with attracting new committers > and making its first release. Within Yahoo, on our research > clusters, the jobs are roughly broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 > java map/reduce, and 1/3 pig, so it is a very relevant project. > > +1 > > -- Owen From general-return-74-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 17:11:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 84652 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 17:11:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 17:11:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 63367 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 17:11:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63345 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 17:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63334 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 17:11:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:10:52 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1275131fgb.35 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hnu96zMA4vnq6+JZ/xd8dF6yS2NhbhhTX5OEZ/+KY2M=; b=GhuyEMxLyPPLCNXQaktPFYlMtrLGa4pE04oqBB89UZAGP3enu9a9b4bVWE8cUsbcFt qf9pQHednTsgnvcnLftrTxCBKFq3YSGYPlr8hls4VsE/ScwPph9i8lXNvVvBAUFp7M2J SoR8UoZhleg/mA6Nyq0clitlTher2QB/a/XH0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ta1r6zRg/N6hr0nQfvUBjyEdWn0R3BeX04Pq1UQRMf8NtWMjJ1JOXarG9f+kvm1xM/ lgH3bk+UAjlmlLkQrdMzu9qlT4FdkKybEC7bv08Lxa4WgKKYp9UDJyyfcaD1rOBy2Lua ofZqb2DfFLAKxeEVlrMDaCTLtx+Nhlj4GZtfY= Received: by 10.187.159.15 with SMTP id l15mr1090570fao.95.1223917871088; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.224.13 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70810131011v5280ae8t8d5dd978b8c165fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:10 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. dhruba On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > +1 > > Arun > > On Oct 12, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well getting >> through the incubator, both with attracting new committers and making its >> first release. Within Yahoo, on our research clusters, the jobs are roughly >> broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 java map/reduce, and 1/3 pig, so it is a >> very relevant project. >> >> +1 >> >> -- Owen > > From general-return-75-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 13 19:01:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 57067 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2008 19:01:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2008 19:01:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 13136 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 19:01:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12907 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2008 19:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12845 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 19:01:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:01:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:00:09 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m9DIwGaY035426; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=ZHMSUTsbMZhxrvmn7oh1tyMykqRmpN0nvninA2zqK7qgN7Bj+wi9Izf/UaDNME3L Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:16 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:15 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029B0027@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Thread-Index: AcktXm6U9TzLIFY0Q8yocLvuT8myYgABVN7Q References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> From: "Olga Natkovich" To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2008 18:58:16.0476 (UTC) FILETIME=[A67A75C0:01C92D65] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Noel, My understanding is that graduation into a subproject is a 3 step process: (1) Community vote (optional but desired) (2) Project that will accept the subproject (in this case Hadoop) votes (3) Incubator PMC votes. I think we completed step (1) and need to move to step (2). Is this correct? Olga > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:04 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org; pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject >=20 > Olga, >=20 > I saw your: >=20 > Total: 9 +1 0 -1 > Pig Committers: 6 +1 0 -1 > Pig Mentors: 1 +1 0 -1 >=20 > But please note that only Incubator PMC votes actually count,=20 > and you need at least 3. Whom do you have besides the one=20 > Mentor and mine (herein granted)? >=20 > Also, since you intend to graduate into Hadoop, that PMC must=20 > vote to accept Pig -- we don't force it on them. ;-) Has=20 > that happened? >=20 > --- Noel >=20 >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 >=20 From general-return-76-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 14 06:58:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 59918 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2008 06:58:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 69384 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69368 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35638 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 18:05:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MessageIsInfected: false From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: , Cc: Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:04:05 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Olga, I saw your: Total: 9 +1 0 -1 Pig Committers: 6 +1 0 -1 Pig Mentors: 1 +1 0 -1 But please note that only Incubator PMC votes actually count, and you need at least 3. Whom do you have besides the one Mentor and mine (herein granted)? Also, since you intend to graduate into Hadoop, that PMC must vote to accept Pig -- we don't force it on them. ;-) Has that happened? --- Noel From general-return-77-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 14 06:58:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 59971 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2008 06:58:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 69535 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69513 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 06:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66030 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2008 18:25:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:24:57 -0700 From: Craig L Russell Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject In-reply-to: Sender: Craig.Russell@Sun.COM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <4262C847-D56F-42C2-81B4-C5C4EC2970DD@SUN.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-368-801961841 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-368-801961841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Noel, On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Olga, > > I saw your: > > Total: 9 +1 0 -1 > Pig Committers: 6 +1 0 -1 > Pig Mentors: 1 +1 0 -1 > > But please note that only Incubator PMC votes actually count, and > you need > at least 3. Whom do you have besides the one Mentor and mine (herein > granted)? > > Also, since you intend to graduate into Hadoop, that PMC must vote > to accept > Pig -- we don't force it on them. ;-) Has that happened? > > --- Noel Olga's [VOTE] was for Pig community members (and mentors, of course). From Olga's message: > Please, vote by the end of the day on Thursday, 10/9. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > PS: I am ccing hadoop and incubator general mailing lists; however, > no > action is required from them at this time. This step is for Pig > community only. Craig > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! --Apple-Mail-368-801961841 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGUDCCAwkw ggJyoAMCAQICECvOQSuIjHMvOZRC95BRg/wwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA3MTIxMDE1MjM1MVoXDTA4MTIwOTE1MjM1 MVowbDEQMA4GA1UEBBMHUnVzc2VsbDEUMBIGA1UEKhMLQ3JhaWcgTGFpcmQxHDAaBgNVBAMTE0Ny YWlnIExhaXJkIFJ1c3NlbGwxJDAiBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFUNyYWlnLlJ1c3NlbGxAU3VuLkNPTTCC ASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAKzqGlLUastboCRqc0iBoTz2ODcqpMpEyPUo nYtluchkSIoWzOW63AuoTczRt9sKfhwoK5mope+62B6Li06WJabm2UHqKAaNSuMHLsmyqvOdwbSt enY7/HxOSCMqVoyVBTRJc2M8feCSVgi7ptGq9cM+Maa64R1/p9zqaQNucceU/1uper90bWplsjAT rHgicgr9XJIQb6uYjhjlgxxnY/aispnCvLxMX+CiA2FWeeJTI7AiFlLwibTXYF4v12ToByvXtTiJ knuND8qpwhK3Wp0tL4ae8mZ0nlKjCuNnqh99ZyEyTFHZBfVx8WSWRXkY4qxCG/IDQUo7WUaefOQT 1mECAwEAAaMyMDAwIAYDVR0RBBkwF4EVQ3JhaWcuUnVzc2VsbEBTdW4uQ09NMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQC MAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAEqfFNFoch0QPVKWJ4maAZl3MJD10yMeWt5xb+WNSkhYKHD8I 42E8tpdE3kmc5wp2cZrz9JqJF/KCQ/gI4pmDk1qpTs5pvXzFNiD5Lu5eLza4iyxSlTHUXcCnyNC6 4m0qC8p4m/51NEql5hyacj/+vdlEe5dygpyNGUCiyA/SdAswggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQH EwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h aWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMw NzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3Rl IENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWls IElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUE cJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMB AAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3Js LnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYD VR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GB AEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+ hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC 3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDEDCCAwwCAQEwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECECvOQSuIjHMvOZRC95BRg/wwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAW8wGAYJKoZIhvcN AQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDgxMDEzMTgyNDU3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0B CQQxFgQUVrbFvkdta8J/9cuSVeJvdSw+QAEwgYUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDF4MHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMC WkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0 ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhArzkEriIxzLzmUQveQUYP8MIGHBgsqhkiG 9w0BCRACCzF4oHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQ dHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAhAr zkEriIxzLzmUQveQUYP8MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAHJfoON8Z/TBOW9vs+7Pwg1C2RFjFX+Q 25FCRr3o5D9KDGbc8sDi8nUc7sLaO7QvK+GO+TURwt1PYuRqsmnbunpnD0I2eHTbS2t+ORd6Xl3S lvzkbzJb2RSxAdzLB3k6Rkyij6Eoccntjqgo7RLJl3JSG8MBjDgrVm5JOu/lypJx2PLE5DbOgjVs seSULYUZP8wy+WrOJJMtE+alFXP1sC2dVhwAd3/+xEM2TXdyXrutNkRsLWDIPewsZ6UImJjvQxfY p/t4j/FBRkEsKtCfOBD2DY/WKQcOwHXMhq5hStFHT8tANkTDLCPFujknjRFNvp/7p1Bw9spR5HVL x5BOU/gAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-368-801961841-- From general-return-78-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 14 16:25:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 86065 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2008 16:25:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2008 16:25:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 36750 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 16:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36731 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2008 16:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23998 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2008 16:20:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yoavshapira@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=1VPB8OEJ45rj3qfa1qA3HyLb/u81WOrkjgDfm6/Gwzg=; b=WxCgC/Ypwp++2Se+ZTSMkdU9WI6PNjzA9nPm4AaIiaX4j4YVzzn5SiGKUajo/IvbxN fvAFp1v2/zXkgpuudxPtwpQ5J11KGSraZDVHpTyZqhBxKdotYvX22akKJutAypjAm14p CNuXIAnH1TInR6cTIVrB02rN5sODc3V6cwzPY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=q3TrLFq+BkUHMvn03W3FegYPRarXrcCO1hLws9ObMC/jatYVIl0u4A6JxlxB9gzy9d Yvl2CYqvXdwkzLyN0PX0pn5NyzOioIuS83tRPOtx3sT+wHlfBGw4GPjSFIbu4nwUH4OF KMns/+AtKoUbrUSAFZRoqK+k2o7oW7ADJM6eI= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:20:06 -0400 From: "Yoav Shapira" Sender: yoavshapira@gmail.com To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig graduation to hadoop subproject Cc: general@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 499d7ada11fcda47 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > As of now, we have completed graduation requirements as described in > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > I would like to call for a graduation vote at this time. +1 Late, I know, was traveling. Yoav From general-return-79-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 16 17:21:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 62452 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2008 17:21:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2008 17:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19710 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2008 17:21:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19687 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2008 17:21:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19674 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2008 17:21:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:21:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.13] (HELO mail-gx0-f13.google.com) (209.85.217.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:20:08 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so7689340gxk.5 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=KKBu/3Tia+mqjYlvPmBdiQOKpPTV07GDXAvNTbah790=; b=N4+Qsf6M/o2rr8v1CmUM2WPjEgUpq79xPRxh+nAoZY8Aarewwk+njcNFwx6ca2Uex3 233jQdKnZTCUeShScw/klIYsYDeSM3o9NaIr/AAyifD3ubYm9sjYyQEz7SilAE+6tYgp zSkXFSMCA4lPIDsHiMdkgXyhknO0idp5UWVk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=m8Yz+qugtDrJ00Rh7bBGeV3JH8PN5T1xW345UpBLaimvg64JTNzitadCtW7wKClMsZ pHA/rfqCzXQRcQdls0i/cgCWEcrkkzvFL1b42G6dJTJya0qYtFEf5oxQp1zaRH3uSpOT uFSPcu33seCjlok/pYmSIt+ySUyXuFyHlbuXk= Received: by 10.142.212.19 with SMTP id k19mr834151wfg.155.1224177584372; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-191-253.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.191.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm783558wfi.11.2008.10.16.10.19.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48F777AC.80509@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:19:40 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we accept Pig as a subproject? I think it has done well getting > through the incubator, both with attracting new committers and making > its first release. Within Yahoo, on our research clusters, the jobs are > roughly broken down into 1/3 streaming, 1/3 java map/reduce, and 1/3 > pig, so it is a very relevant project. > > +1 > > -- Owen From general-return-80-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 17 17:24:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 17863 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 17:24:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 17:24:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1615 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:24:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1467 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:24:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1453 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2008 17:24:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:24:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.40] (HELO QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:23:32 +0000 Received: from OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TriK1a0780bG4ec54tQ9V6; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:24:09 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TtPd1a00T2SbwD53PtPjJB; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:24:04 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Bx4iz1Cc0xIA:10 a=QT7C_Xz5BxwA:10 a=skSSq9RChP7sE-xtKCUA:9 a=i3VmUkf1QgXPTj67B-dv1xUJnKMA:4 a=bdDRB4-mPNEA:10 Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org Message-Id: <357828F7-5CAC-40DE-96AA-CC14FBF18508@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <48F777AC.80509@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:23:37 -0700 References: <48F777AC.80509@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we accept Pig as a subproject? With six +1's from the Hadoop PMC, the vote passes. Hadoop will have a new subproject. *smile* -- Owen From general-return-81-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 17 17:40:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 30571 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 17:40:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 17:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 24869 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:40:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24615 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:40:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24577 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2008 17:40:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:40:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:39:12 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m9HHcUfZ020847; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=SGtCLiBBQcuQgMwpZnCyFSygTe4iGs1tqhpgi9zY/XAXlUaxicBJEN4xhfsuou75 Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:38:30 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:38:24 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029B0611@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Thread-Index: Ackwff3XXalbnsaFTl23jXd8QuP5UwAAP1cw References: <48F777AC.80509@apache.org> <357828F7-5CAC-40DE-96AA-CC14FBF18508@apache.org> From: "Olga Natkovich" To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2008 17:38:30.0432 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B6D1A00:01C9307F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Bertrand, Since you are one of our mentors, could you please start that vote. Thanks, Olga=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: bdelacretaz@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacretaz@gmail.com] On=20 > Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 10:29 AM > To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? >=20 > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Owen O'Malley=20 > wrote: > > Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > >> Should we accept Pig as a subproject? > > > > With six +1's from the Hadoop PMC, the vote passes. Hadoop=20 > will have a=20 > > new subproject. *smile* >=20 > Note that according to [1] this requires a final "Graduation=20 > Approval Vote" by the incubator PMC. >=20 > -Bertrand (*smile* as well, don't get me wrong ;-) >=20 > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 >=20 From general-return-82-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 17 17:47:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 36344 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 17:47:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 17:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 34803 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34776 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2008 17:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11449 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2008 17:29:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bdelacretaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=1MqWIovlQGd0PY/5A7Lspjl6UhoANpFvdjRKSPml5nk=; b=S29QZPpRzfxTJG0/YC0Bs6/o0q44tT17NZi0uvHMsxgkoQIp+gRZYcVRM7hf1d9Wur fMUBY9UcDEYa4sjUrYlGM/c5xkpy2s+oG/MxRNoioQ005ukziUsIxVwJ6ZzSJaYeVXty 3S3+fFuevVvyGLlS+lwB9ToVrwCzsv0OMpjPc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cej1Oag0YFSxj1vv27R/Q2BhssInf+Dkp41fM4/L0fAmxPUK0B/IffiaU3+xRoRQmq HRPE2lfPCqt5hbecxU0/YxgmNLdkfLLZOT34nuyFc8SWpz3ax3ipPISo8BptfJEYXXBF YqXA2GZHCFhEjMHcyTnZwUaQf8Ej+2e0xSfyw= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:28:48 +0200 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" Sender: bdelacretaz@gmail.com To: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject? Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <357828F7-5CAC-40DE-96AA-CC14FBF18508@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48F777AC.80509@apache.org> <357828F7-5CAC-40DE-96AA-CC14FBF18508@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 80a47cb4fbb8853c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Should we accept Pig as a subproject? > > With six +1's from the Hadoop PMC, the vote passes. Hadoop will have a new > subproject. *smile* Note that according to [1] this requires a final "Graduation Approval Vote" by the incubator PMC. -Bertrand (*smile* as well, don't get me wrong ;-) [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject From general-return-83-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 22 01:30:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 59576 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2008 01:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 72414 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72388 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43565 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2008 22:39:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=XwIwaJ64xdUW9icCdxpvKYZHgG6SEQqDTKA4xyb1Z00MVMuYSE/EUWNM9sybetA+ User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.13.0.080930 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:37:29 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop Camp next month From: Milind Bhandarkar To: , CC: , , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Hadoop Camp next month Thread-Index: AckkqOl125MZ2Ah2T/iPg34L8dZJSQPJK/VK In-Reply-To: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2008 22:38:19.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[B79F4330:01C933CD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Just received an email from ApacheCon US organizers that they are giving 50% discount for Hadoop Training (http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/93). ---- >We just created a discount code for you to give people 50% off of the >cost of the training. The code is < Hadoop50 > The discount would >apply only to the Training. ---- Hope to see you there ! - Milind On 10/2/08 9:03 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > Hi all, > I'd like to remind everyone that the Hadoop Camp & ApacheCon US is > coming up in New Orleans next month. http://tinyurl.com/hadoop-camp > > It will be the largest gathering of Hadoop developers outside of > California. We'll have: > > Core: Doug Cutting, Dhruba Borthakur, Arun Murthy, Owen O'Malley, > Sameer Paranjpye, > Sanjay Radia, Tom White > Zookeeper: Ben Reed > > There will also be a training session on Practical Problem Solving > with Hadoop by Milind Bhandarkar on Monday. > > So if you'd like to meet the developers or find out more about Hadoop, > come join us! > > -- Owen -- Milind Bhandarkar Y!IM: GridSolutions 408-349-2136 (milindb@yahoo-inc.com) From general-return-84-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 22 01:30:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 59874 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2008 01:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 72590 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72568 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 01:30:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69054 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2008 01:26:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.215 as permitted sender) From: "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" To: Milind Bhandarkar , "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "pig-user@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:25:57 -0700 Subject: RE: Hadoop Camp next month Thread-Topic: Hadoop Camp next month Thread-Index: AckkqOl125MZ2Ah2T/iPg34L8dZJSQPJK/VKAAXiAMA= Message-ID: References: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --- Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation) > -----Original Message----- > From: Milind Bhandarkar [mailto:milindb@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 3:37 PM > To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; pig- > user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop Camp next month > > Hi, > > Just received an email from ApacheCon US organizers that they are giving > 50% > discount for Hadoop Training > (http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/93). > > ---- > >We just created a discount code for you to give people 50% off of the > >cost of the training. The code is < Hadoop50 > The discount would > >apply only to the Training. > ---- > > Hope to see you there ! > > - Milind > > > On 10/2/08 9:03 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'd like to remind everyone that the Hadoop Camp & ApacheCon US is > > coming up in New Orleans next month. http://tinyurl.com/hadoop-camp > > > > It will be the largest gathering of Hadoop developers outside of > > California. We'll have: > > > > Core: Doug Cutting, Dhruba Borthakur, Arun Murthy, Owen O'Malley, > > Sameer Paranjpye, > > Sanjay Radia, Tom White > > Zookeeper: Ben Reed > > > > There will also be a training session on Practical Problem Solving > > with Hadoop by Milind Bhandarkar on Monday. > > > > So if you'd like to meet the developers or find out more about Hadoop, > > come join us! > > > > -- Owen > > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > Y!IM: GridSolutions > 408-349-2136 > (milindb@yahoo-inc.com) From general-return-85-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 22 07:52:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 18887 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 07:52:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2008 07:52:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 51234 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 07:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51183 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 07:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51126 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2008 07:52:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:52:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bdelacretaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.29] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:51:39 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 31so545529yxl.29 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=xXyfvL84L5MChJBeEFdLEYQHnuN8cCBqPqtbKVwvF8I=; b=mcDlwnHeTg7vbBccm8JkbhNQFallbeWY5vLLE51Sm6wKHgbOM8asr1O8e+Lf2plXtO JAwasqXB+M0x8Hzq5tOz4Tb3QYrhz6JxkAc4lf1Rvbf+WlHF/Zr3bdBCwcDjwJMBeTOE v8bhWdHXP1vi44bcQjxBnz8VfNt6qNvXq2mQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=HLJ3wQIMwVCmKnJcfOqQDI2MDyqdreLbM3MhvaFTABeWnU8Lunr8bDTM1qQ+akmgwc rBZhey2AKCbgwszntzqw0fzYvowccKTfAv9xt670+rcf9Ie1qyWPwNO33AnXpqQZTiXK waX5SsDC63bvB9REuw2Qc1CHkxPRccJehjWEw= Received: by 10.150.95.15 with SMTP id s15mr1168257ybb.219.1224661937159; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.227.21 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:52:17 +0200 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" Sender: bdelacretaz@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept Pig graduation as a Hadoop subproject Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 90569f5287dcac85 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...The Pig [1] and Hadoop [2] communities have voted to graduate Pig as a > Hadoop subproject. > > According to [3| the Incubator PMC needs to accept this graduation. > > Please cast your votes - as the weekend is starting, I'll tally the > vote open until Wednesday October 22n morning UTC.... The vote passes with +1s from the following 9 incubator PMC members, and no other votes: Yoav Shapira (mentor) Upayavira Doug Cutting (mentor) Craig L Russell Paul Fremantle Jukka Zitting Martijn Dashorst Matt Hogstrom Bertrand Delacretaz (mentor) Thanks everybody, and congratulations to the Pig team! I will update the incubator website info accordingly, in the next few days. -Bertrand > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-pig-dev/200810.mbox/%3C236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE1029AF8FA@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com%3E > > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/200810.mbox/%3CA2880476-79A5-4D72-9DD9-B07366F12801@apache.org%3E > > [3] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject > [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig From general-return-86-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 22 14:26:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 36481 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 14:26:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2008 14:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 47304 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 14:26:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47233 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 14:26:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47198 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2008 14:26:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:26:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bdelacretaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.13] (HELO mail-gx0-f13.google.com) (209.85.217.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:25:04 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so7383288gxk.5 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=J3tKJ3i6C+cDBu5eRAR/xumNWgo1A6A0sHhKh6SeHSU=; b=Qtic/FZahxgYveUNBONzX6p1xMnZ4KMdGLYjFT3fl/ZnObaoUR+tw7uXHlFmz/QKjg vHHNn9rFfDJta3Sst6RO3Bwv3rDgy+Fbg4c53K15l11jWIdqkA5/HCzUsscrf4fTW1gL GR51Vf3e43zpZV71JBsrhcCs61ihBoPI92rSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=KsLvxN2/uqcAR699HxhaIQRsvGLAhvKyH2Hp6o7XAQ3RNy+ZH2gAtvIHvfnS5GIfS6 qW7kkEziIoBrWWo5KuT0qP/6UCIdCETmgzmEawtSv3RgZTr8bKPa0xiwB9rqd41+MexG JOV5uajBjEr7NSnI9UYX1jdQrnVl+0Ie1X2k4= Received: by 10.151.42.18 with SMTP id u18mr1753894ybj.186.1224685481373; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.227.21 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:24:41 +0200 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" Sender: bdelacretaz@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept Pig graduation as a Hadoop subproject Cc: pig-dev@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 14d7a7397cf519a7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...I will update the incubator website info accordingly, in the next few days... Done, the following pages reflect pig's new status: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html http://incubator.apache.org/projects/pig.html And I have also removed pig from http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule -Bertrand From general-return-87-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 24 09:10:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 37387 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2008 09:10:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2008 09:10:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 70540 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2008 09:10:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70514 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2008 09:10:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70502 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2008 09:10:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:10:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pinaki.poddar@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:08:49 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so392251nfd.9 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=w4CRVQjPJVjbxOGa+3hR3RLrHYOVhsw4wpj0Wp8UQ84=; b=uWuy34rQz6n82VTonR8/3EeUNWsj9o82m07tbCAnp50tdMRWTNaQ2MwitgDFFy+Mv4 ekk59pX6RQdVS6TIOTpHy+gkHTKEtVgs+D6OfIam+zXcLgI00ZDzvK9bBxyXgKl7nnkO P+RUdyV5BMWd6gfVkTJrekYWlmpB0+n7D/2hg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=aiwdsWk9aZgN8K+Sv5Qhymj57QMV7miHU09bF2ZY8vGm8a+l7SYqdhRKKaaWvK3KzD oBeMwiFDv+X4p6+C4eheN+nmEgyoX66rxZYxgEJZn3kijfamf/AkfHLi9lxA6J5zXSQf sGZUA8Sri/zxfW5cPuLouVuCKN46kOfnJE6IM= Received: by 10.210.128.5 with SMTP id a5mr1997147ebd.151.1224839358106; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.10.16 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:09:18 -0500 From: "Pinaki Poddar" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: broken links to Hadoop at ApacheCon presentations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Please note that one or more URL [1] under 'Hadoop at ApacheCon" in the front page [2] of Hadoop website is broken. [1] http://eu.apachecon.com/eu2008/program/talk/2403 [2] http://hadoop.apache.org/index.html Pinaki From general-return-88-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 27 03:01:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 79008 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 03:01:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2008 03:01:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 53735 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2008 03:01:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53536 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2008 03:01:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53403 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2008 03:01:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:01:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:00:16 +0000 Received: from [10.72.78.125] (snvvpn2-10-72-78-c125.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.78.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id m9R30sHk062091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49052EE6.30809@apache.org> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:00:54 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce our first official Apache release, version 3.0.0 of ZooKeeper. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. Version 3.0.0 is a major version upgrade from our previous 2.2.1 release on SourceForge, it addresses over 100 issues. If you are upgrading be sure to review the 3.0.0 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.0.0 Release Notes and Migration Instructions are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.0.0/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-89-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 28 15:42:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 61429 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2008 15:42:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2008 15:42:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 29885 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2008 15:42:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29857 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2008 15:42:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29846 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2008 15:42:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:42:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.162.86.230] (HELO relay4.rai.it) (212.162.86.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:41:20 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp705.servizi.rai.it) ([10.24.1.135]) by relay10.rai.it with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2008 16:40:58 +0100 Importance: normal Received: from VRMTEULEXC710A.ict.corp.rai.it ([10.24.49.136]) by smtp705.servizi.rai.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:40:58 +0100 Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Connection problems Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:40:59 +0100 Message-ID: <163906E8B916DB4E8D15AE5225965EFEF2ED16@VRMTEULEXC710A.ict.corp.rai.it> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Connection problems thread-index: Ack5E5Mq8cBRxZNoSHKI7Or3sJiDVA== From: "Messina Alberto" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2008 15:40:58.0301 (UTC) FILETIME=[92928ED0:01C93913] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I've just installed a minimal fully distributed hadoop pool with two servers: a master (democrito) and a slave (pascal). The master runs on port 24000. All firewalls are down, ssh passphraseless is ok, nothing in the hosts.allow/hosts.deny. Configuration files are the following (resp. on the master and on the slave): fs.default.name democrito:24000 mapred.job.tracker democrito:24001 dfs.replication 2 fs.default.name hdfs://democrito:24000 mapred.job.tracker democrito:24001 dfs.replication 2 I've got "connection refused " problems when the slave tries to connect to the master in the bootstrap phase: 2008-10-28 16:18:35,228 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 0 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:36,231 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 1 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:37,233 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 2 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:38,235 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 3 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:39,238 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 4 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:40,241 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 5 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:41,244 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 6 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:42,246 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 7 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:43,248 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 8 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:44,250 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 9 time(s). 2008-10-28 16:18:44,254 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: java.io.IOException: Call failed on local exception at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:718) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:319) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:306) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:343) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:288) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:244) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.(DataNode.java:190) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:2987) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:2942) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:2950) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:3072) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:300) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:177) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:789) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:704) ... 12 more Can anyone help please? Thank you Alberto=20 -------------------------------------------------------- Questa e-mail, ed i suoi eventuali allegati, contengono informazioni = confidenziali e riservate.=20 Se avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per errore non utilizzatene il = contenuto e non portatelo a conoscenza di alcuno. Siete inoltre pregati = di eliminarla dalla vostra casella e avvisare il mittente.=20 E' da rilevare inoltre che l'attuale infrastruttura tecnologica non puo' = garantire l'autenticita' del mittente, ne' tantomeno l'integrita' dei = contenuti.=20 Opinioni, conclusioni ed altre informazioni contenute nel messaggio = possono rappresentare punti di vista personali a meno di diversa = esplicita indicazione autorizzata. -------------------------------------------------------- From general-return-90-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 30 18:12:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 97195 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2008 18:12:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2008 18:12:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 39119 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2008 18:12:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38984 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2008 18:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38973 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2008 18:12:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:12:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:10:51 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9UI3msm012270 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m9UI3loA012268 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:03:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Connection problems Date: 30 Oct 2008 14:03:47 -0400 X-Mailer: Prayer v1.0.16 X-Originating-IP: [70.119.152.61] In-Reply-To: <163906E8B916DB4E8D15AE5225965EFEF2ED16@VRMTEULEXC710A.ict.corp.rai.it> Message-ID: References: <163906E8B916DB4E8D15AE5225965EFEF2ED16@VRMTEULEXC710A.ict.corp.rai.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=4.7 required=5.0 tests=FH_RELAY_NODNS, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no version=3.2.4 Alberto, Drop the 'hdfs,' hadoop will complain but it won't keep it from working (you can add it later). make sure that the full address of democrito is written out. So, for instance my cluster is scerola, so the headnode is scerola.cs.ucf.edu:9000 (can also just use the ip address). Also the hadoop-site.xml needs to be identical for all nodes whether master or slave regards - Grant On Oct 28 2008, Messina Alberto wrote: >Hello, > >I've just installed a minimal fully distributed hadoop pool with two >servers: a master (democrito) and a slave (pascal). The master runs on >port 24000. All firewalls are down, ssh passphraseless is ok, nothing in >the hosts.allow/hosts.deny. Configuration files are the following (resp. >on the master and on the slave): > > > > > > > > > fs.default.name > democrito:24000 > > > mapred.job.tracker > democrito:24001 > > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > > > > > > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://democrito:24000 > > > mapred.job.tracker > democrito:24001 > > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > > > >I've got "connection refused " problems when the slave tries to connect >to the master in the bootstrap phase: > >2008-10-28 16:18:35,228 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 0 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:36,231 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 1 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:37,233 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 2 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:38,235 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 3 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:39,238 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 4 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:40,241 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 5 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:41,244 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 6 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:42,246 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 7 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:43,248 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 8 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:44,250 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying >connect to server: democrito/10.2.6.187:24000. Already tried 9 time(s). >2008-10-28 16:18:44,254 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: >java.io.IOException: Call failed on local exception > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:718) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown >Source) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:319) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:306) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:343) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:288) > at >org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:244) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.(DataNode.java:190) > at >org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:2987) > at >org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:2942) > at >org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:2950) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:3072) >Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > at >sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) > at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100) > at >org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:300) > at >org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:177) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:789) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:704) > ... 12 more > >Can anyone help please? > > >Thank you > >Alberto >-------------------------------------------------------- > > Questa e-mail, ed i suoi eventuali allegati, contengono informazioni > confidenziali e riservate. Se avete ricevuto questa comunicazione per > errore non utilizzatene il contenuto e non portatelo a conoscenza di > alcuno. Siete inoltre pregati di eliminarla dalla vostra casella e > avvisare il mittente. E' da rilevare inoltre che l'attuale infrastruttura > tecnologica non puo' garantire l'autenticita' del mittente, ne' tantomeno > l'integrita' dei contenuti. Opinioni, conclusioni ed altre informazioni > contenute nel messaggio possono rappresentare punti di vista personali a > meno di diversa esplicita indicazione autorizzata. > -------------------------------------------------------- > -- Grant Mackey UCF Researcher Eng. III Rm238 From general-return-91-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 31 17:49:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 32617 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 17:49:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 17:49:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 94412 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2008 17:49:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94264 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2008 17:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93784 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2008 17:49:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:49:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:47:56 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.112.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m9VHkvHS083782; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer; b=tDy6v01/y6NaaFCxBZM4y0NV0IEeQGH5wM1el04/TQoASXPjDjf9dXHtbA0yugzr Message-Id: From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-207398310 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: ApacheCon US 2008 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:46:57 -0700 Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-5-207398310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just a reminder that ApacheCon US is next week in New Orleans. There will be a lot of Hadoop developers and talks. (I'm CC'ing core-user because it has the widest coverage. Please join the low traffic general@hadoop list for cross sub-project announcements.) * Hadoop Camp with lots of talks about Hadoop o Introduction to Hadoop by Owen O'Malley o A Tour of Apache Hadoop by Tom White o Programming Hadoop Map/Reduce by Arun Murthy o Hadoop at Yahoo! by Eric Baldeschwieler o Hadoop Futures Panel o Using Hadoop for an Intranet Seach Engine by Shivakumar Vaithyanthan o Cloud Computing Testbed by Thomas Sandholm o Improving Virtualization and Performance Tracing of Hadoop with Open Solaris by George Porter o An Insight into Hadoop Usage at Facebook by Dhruba Borthakur o Pig by Alan Gates o Zookeeper, Coordinating the Distributed Application by Ben Reed o Querying JSON Data on Hadoop using Jaql by Kevin Beyer o HBase by Michael Stack * Hadoop training on Practical Problem Solving in Hadoop * Cloudera is providing a test Hadoop cluster and a Hadoop hacking contest. There is also a new Hadoop tutorial available. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-5-207398310-- From general-return-92-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 31 18:25:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 61558 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 18:25:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 18:25:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 42399 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2008 18:25:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42325 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2008 18:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42301 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2008 18:25:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:25:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.83] (HELO spunkymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:24:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [74.229.189.244]) by spunkymail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5BA5B61B; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <0A9C2702-EA2F-4F69-A225-36C82EC147D2@apache.org> From: Grant Ingersoll To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: ApacheCon US 2008 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:24:40 -0400 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I will also be presenting on Mahout (machine learning) on Wednesday at 3:30 (I think). It will have some Hadoop flavor in it. -Grant On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Just a reminder that ApacheCon US is next week in New Orleans. There > will be a lot of Hadoop developers and talks. (I'm CC'ing core-user > because it has the widest coverage. Please join the low traffic > general@hadoop list for cross sub-project announcements.) > > * Hadoop Camp with lots of talks about Hadoop > o Introduction to Hadoop by Owen O'Malley > o A Tour of Apache Hadoop by Tom White > o Programming Hadoop Map/Reduce by Arun Murthy > o Hadoop at Yahoo! by Eric Baldeschwieler > o Hadoop Futures Panel > o Using Hadoop for an Intranet Seach Engine by Shivakumar > Vaithyanthan > o Cloud Computing Testbed by Thomas Sandholm > o Improving Virtualization and Performance Tracing of > Hadoop with Open Solaris > by George Porter > o An Insight into Hadoop Usage at Facebook by Dhruba > Borthakur > o Pig by Alan Gates > o Zookeeper, Coordinating the Distributed Application by > Ben Reed > o Querying JSON Data on Hadoop using Jaql by Kevin Beyer > o HBase by Michael Stack > * Hadoop training on Practical Problem Solving in Hadoop > * Cloudera is providing a test Hadoop cluster and a Hadoop > hacking contest. > > There is also a new Hadoop tutorial available. > > -- Owen From general-return-93-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 04 18:23:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 72695 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2008 18:23:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2008 18:23:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 37534 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2008 18:23:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37371 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2008 18:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37324 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2008 18:23:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:23:05 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:21:45 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id mA4ILxKS042274; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:21:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=k0F0BRu127Yc5QiYIN9z5sOfQnqI6dp8ZkxQgGkzrPPLPXQ5Tr6iPeOprAls3SaU Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.18.2 available Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:21:58 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.18.2 fixes many critical bugs in 0.18.1. For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Hadoop 0.18.2 Release Notes are at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.18.2/releasenotes.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From general-return-94-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 15 00:49:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 13129 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2008 00:49:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2008 00:49:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 46202 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2008 00:49:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46031 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2008 00:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45917 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2008 00:49:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:49:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:47:56 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id mAF0kjHT003925; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:46:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=B4GD7iyJ52kljX6qv8eY9DoG7NEn4EGsi0btBxxbUXLJvord7PwId064mkpjz8G0 Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:46:44 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:46:44 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th Thread-Index: AckkqOob9DI4jbMCQEeTE1RcN+ztSQFk7y8wBx86AbA= References: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Ajay Anand" To: , , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2008 00:46:45.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[A226F2E0:01C946BB] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 19th at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Join us for a talk on Chukwa, a Hadoop based large scale performance monitoring system. Please register at: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1363930/ Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay From general-return-95-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 18 23:00:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 96053 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2008 23:00:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2008 23:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 37607 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2008 23:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37506 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2008 23:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37398 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2008 23:00:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:59:32 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id mAIMwn9P042621; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:58:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=RWyg9xVgj4kcxM8M1hp2MDU1IAAgNLCLS+IKbTxQ1/wtqEuXZOwvOKi1WOTpLnwX Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:58:48 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:58:47 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th Thread-Index: AckkqOob9DI4jbMCQEeTE1RcN+ztSQFk7y8wBx86AbAAxZK/kA== References: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Ajay Anand" To: , , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 22:58:48.0778 (UTC) FILETIME=[37ABFAA0:01C949D1] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please note that the room for this has been changed to Yahoo! Mission College Building 2, Training Rooms 5 & 6. Thanks Ajay -----Original Message----- From: Ajay Anand=20 Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:47 PM To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'pig-user@incubator.apache.org' Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 19th at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Join us for a talk on Chukwa, a Hadoop based large scale performance monitoring system. Please register at: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1363930/ Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay From general-return-96-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 21 16:44:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 40024 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2008 16:44:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2008 16:44:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 38249 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2008 16:44:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38094 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2008 16:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38083 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2008 16:44:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alloe130@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.178] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:43:31 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n7so559735wag.29 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=I+HCrO6DcEMkM6IdZgZ1YVQXMdEtjY4S8ifgmrHoIHU=; b=gg8tefUx/d/6DAbjWrqG6I6nwwnxyWVn6SbOIRLSrICdd2akC0SQL0JRi458j+1YrG MTcvxqAIYVsDE2boXH0C8sOnXYYIszjiZ29L5MFsysop0YRZlBanfOi6bq7dB3Ko2qrl ugjA7eP/1tyoS0/dhCnIaNoGb4f4xj098T5Es= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=F0DUFTbDrJ+LV9yUuR/k5ll9RaTJeA7OvWRT35Lbim64kmu63jIpq1G6KRxC0MBMJH 4p0pkfZ97kLTq/aFBwx73c3qHYDPvVIX/ZPTu9PPJ2/nQmnJ6lekVxvdkyggkZH6rfwj W2bGA/ww9PaYI4PYTO3N3ux1aEuoWh1uD8LE4= Received: by 10.114.133.1 with SMTP id g1mr417487wad.21.1227285856573; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.176.16 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:44:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92adf0e80811210844r4bbd3eeob988a668f3cb7ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:44:16 +0900 From: "Donguk Choi" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_24656_26313052.1227285856563" References: <57D7A94E-E310-4F65-82E6-858EBB1D14EE@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_24656_26313052.1227285856563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thank you for your help :) On 11/19/08, Ajay Anand wrote: > > Please note that the room for this has been changed to Yahoo! Mission > College Building 2, Training Rooms 5 & 6. > Thanks > Ajay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ajay Anand > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:47 PM > To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; > 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; > 'pig-user@incubator.apache.org' > Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) Nov 19th > > The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, > November 19th at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building > 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. > > Join us for a talk on Chukwa, a Hadoop based large scale performance > monitoring system. > > Please register at: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1363930/ > > Look forward to seeing you there! > Ajay > -- Best. Regards, Donguk Choi http://www.alloes.com ------=_Part_24656_26313052.1227285856563-- From general-return-97-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 24 23:38:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 35076 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2008 23:38:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2008 23:38:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 15850 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2008 23:38:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15772 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2008 23:38:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15304 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2008 23:38:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:38:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:36:48 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-153-138.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c126.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.126]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id mAONbAVn072966; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:37:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=wwd8M0JaWsn4ErU6DB4QmmLgIoSgUQ5/4x4O3/KDN8uYGZmLI2gbiJH4j+eTztos Message-Id: <43A4FA57-5660-4212-BD17-34996ED59600@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.19.0 available Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:37:10 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.19.0 contains many improvements, new features, bug fixes and optimizations. For release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From general-return-14-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 05:30:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 72384 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 05:30:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 05:30:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 68946 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 05:30:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68927 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 05:30:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65434 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 05:23:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=cFrC3KyBonB0TFA0ckXVqfE28RRLSH5CZouUJLUFuqulDVqoykE+5QJ2LDSOMJgQ Message-Id: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:18:14 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: 1. Core (src/core) 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate jiras and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the community much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 is released to give us time to plan the split. -- Owen From general-return-15-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 05:39:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 76413 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 05:39:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 05:39:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 77046 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 05:39:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76987 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 05:39:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76976 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 05:39:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:39:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.190] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:38:19 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so2559383fkx.13 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:38:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5YYa7WGd4hbkN5lpq6Tcmbvc/j1069+Jjl6Eiw4rXV0=; b=BHPwzA8uRSbbaFSUzenrHZdFpu8rRAP+BXaZvK2nmktiWp3e6svNk8c3ZMxYwhQQy4 ywB+oBK9wO2mL7r9OiXt098+GZ7D19RcwGgRaLXNgGqZupIslh8rOfpzMwS+r3bVc8oQ QFFt/z5dgmsJO4zbbxJEvUR1sLfD7KeVRFCro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=krKX9E3bNIFOlbyM+3L4anpegme9zPCzOXss1dAtbox/vLJFok2Kd7NZk3NhmenjJE BHonO7X0rhqCsE/Hiu6tOfGOlESOElzK0J/2bKs8fxDjpukN44xRMNisrugYbKjaba5H Q/4CuG0syCz2WyHx85cjXsWE4aEZrs931C2IA= Received: by 10.125.87.8 with SMTP id p8mr101867mkl.80.1218001125082; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.145.7 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70808052238sb272613v6766a69b76537c33@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:38:45 -0800 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Are you talking about sub-projects for core, hdfs and mapreduce? Or is there another way to allow for having separate mailing lists/jiras for these components? I had liked the fact that these pieces are together. It makes the code compile together, keeps API upgradation simple and enhances developer community building across all these three pieces of code. Actually, JIRAs have their own components and we can always filter them using their component, can't we? thanks, dhruba On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: > > 1. Core (src/core) > 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) > 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) > > There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools and > contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate jiras and > mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the community much > more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 is released to > give us time to plan the split. > > -- Owen > From general-return-16-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 06:14:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 94323 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 06:14:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 06:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 30164 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 06:14:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30148 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 06:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30136 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 06:14:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:14:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:13:16 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.200] (snvvpn2-10-72-78-c47.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.78.47]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m766CE8d052301 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=GBIL8IiId+KMaammv1yoirJkpAab716ODWkD/pSBpY+h6OC/Ukb/3hVei8QOVgkw Message-Id: <46A3BDE2-E00E-4632-B30F-26304E5E24F9@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70808052238sb272613v6766a69b76537c33@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:12:13 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4aa34eb70808052238sb272613v6766a69b76537c33@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > Are you talking about sub-projects for core, hdfs and mapreduce? Sorry, I wasn't clear. Yes, I mean creating new sub-projects. There will clearly be overlap between the sub-projects in terms of committers. In fact, all current Hadoop committers would be on all 3. It just feels like getting 100+ emails a day is overwhelming and most of the developers specialize on one side or the other. So the division seems pretty natural to me. -- Owen From general-return-17-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 09:46:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 33216 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 09:46:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 09:46:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 84995 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 09:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84969 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 09:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84958 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 09:46:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:46:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of guosijie@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.188] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:45:33 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1049728tid.9 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:45:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=INwQcSfPeQcYLdcRrv33FbzhYMLUG0dAwa0Am/OUAqw=; b=veV/lsIHytSvjpLGAg1abzUEb6MPVfOom0GpQA23J9er12XbnlfFj7c6hVGyxj0oOl 0orfJ3bF8MoZSJHFavjuawSMQ4ypCAc2OZiC/ZpU9MwKelTFv+8ON1uBqwwLRlvXAr3p hwd6+ow5Nsj79qEiQ6H0MDKgK/rEzuhAUdBIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FHkJsh/oH6eJ19rtm6L7+eYdP6z0Zcl3v2HqG7vDZfeHxUyfD5NZAFMU61b3XgM8aJ ftCs0HGRER9wVgp6nbrT6fy8OCpH8m0yGbbBSESq4Q8+nDo8Xcb5gW7HAw/Bvr8tIvca unri5ilL8+KiW0iVj2zeLuvnAuq9c3hKyVAD4= Received: by 10.110.7.18 with SMTP id 18mr2236559tig.39.1218015942654; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.10.11.253? ( [159.226.41.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm959045tid.12.2008.08.06.02.45.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489972C7.3060803@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:45:43 +0800 From: Samuel Guo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4aa34eb70808052238sb272613v6766a69b76537c33@mail.gmail.com> <46A3BDE2-E00E-4632-B30F-26304E5E24F9@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <46A3BDE2-E00E-4632-B30F-26304E5E24F9@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > >> Are you talking about sub-projects for core, hdfs and mapreduce? > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. Yes, I mean creating new sub-projects. There > will clearly be overlap between the sub-projects in terms of > committers. In fact, all current Hadoop committers would be on all 3. > It just feels like getting 100+ emails a day is overwhelming and most > of the developers specialize on one side or the other. So the division > seems pretty natural to me. > > -- Owen It sounds a good idea. From general-return-18-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 17:12:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 65244 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 17:12:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 17:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 74462 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 17:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74441 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 17:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69098 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 17:08:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.239 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=A+qx4lL3GpPrHgRQBMcYu4VGYM1Dh4a/ymY7phiqbKQ=; b=Dzc9WbwDphIaqvU2F3CdDFA/g5NAQNf7VK35QTvw7jCE7qHlMH5TgiExbnsiIRKq8C QnxjF0Fe1mhqlJPQNWU4Im6bqecpCr80vPi5SnBxFoZ/D+mt/Jt6UZlx/OU02YN5KAwu 8rWUi+UzKXVjCnfroGNbampTrHZOmE6fHTo/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=D768kQBmuYICRDDNLB6uLWXeOWSAdlgbmehQWpNvSKFJ0RYfTz7yr4tkva3TaveXPD JZcpMOx3PvCQ770nB0dnZfTFwZ5hT+d8XO0FJR62z3N8KjMKOb6x/IDSaPsxaTjYbUS8 vEQ7ob/L7WcY3Jh0Bw6g6wUyU8+aeFSiMv4tE= Message-ID: <4899DA52.4@apache.org> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:07:30 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I agree that it is time to do this. Should we start using Ivy, so that the inter-dependencies are easier to manage? Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: > > 1. Core (src/core) > 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) > 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) > > There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools > and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate > jiras and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the > community much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until > 0.19.0 is released to give us time to plan the split. > > -- Owen From general-return-19-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 17:19:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 68447 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 17:19:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 17:19:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 92679 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 17:19:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92665 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 17:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92654 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 17:19:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:19:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:18:55 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so208762qwe.35 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dbPWfAUF+EHNobo0WldEwLtKzgl+XSvmrfsEC9tZuUs=; b=lz5eeuBIs7VhSDZMdcpBF/Uz48uWq6Kizppppu6RJHEt/671fsQTWYL4COa0/r0syf WC3rvEyEX+ZcEKD7kfJHqgzs+eYn3EP6t4kIaZW5dxUeFHuyCvPkIb38G4mcPiB9Nwt2 w/Q5laj+anqf3OP3CCmF5qBSJg1axP9GIHGVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YjiXDDMospne0ZlAYVqAXxGmsG+Fiyg54yKfKkKH2qoL2t8XpE19Sr0fe2nQSAc/3s 420oiLow7jSmoR2XyPZIIFjdfXzn8TrdZ5i1q6VWkW+75SYpdzxjEaQZ0fb4hsLoWINS mTT/ruRsTeQ+Fq9ipwGqn2i7Ju1SOZBok0Lxw= Received: by 10.150.97.19 with SMTP id u19mr3711798ybb.165.1218043145126; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.220.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70808061019o77dc85cbg6b9ec52d694992bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: <4899DA52.4@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4899DA52.4@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. -dhruba On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +1 > > I agree that it is time to do this. Should we start using Ivy, so that the > inter-dependencies are easier to manage? > > Doug > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: >> >> 1. Core (src/core) >> 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) >> 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) >> >> There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools >> and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate jiras >> and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the community >> much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 is >> released to give us time to plan the split. >> >> -- Owen > From general-return-20-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 20:30:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 13690 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 20:30:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 20:30:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 8101 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:30:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8083 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8072 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 20:30:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:30:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:29:21 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so217903qwe.35 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ecs6VB5dUW1pNtqZFE6KHdEQ9A2HEbVIlLsDbQqVDH8=; b=dD+xcxITUt4RiHPX6ulRF7+x3Y1+CwgxXHx5oL0ehS4eGO1I3woIDyheCTydBI4YAV gdXGkCDGUlrkslVEgAIgMUz1qvaRw06ouuoLFmlUQ+NGtaS7JQOL5ssvI172R1eFgf8E hs3N3+3k6oMYFU+g4DCCXpG5rk1uYWXz2FxeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DNXdhvqxP5GxvI+k3j0xADNDJ1fQcCbNfGACKdlDpEfbmevodJyMls26/BTrW2Mi3G ABoyGYOYx+jd2UY+HgjLzbyLcW4xYAVDeVlZUnZXEqEOL6Cxct3cBYK+uVx68Hx9vJ7M q1s7VP4nBXAiM2H5zh8LEb4lcrypag9rpSlgA= Received: by 10.150.139.15 with SMTP id m15mr4005706ybd.135.1218054587709; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.220.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70808061329h35964613i5a75cc33780749bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:29:47 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70808061019o77dc85cbg6b9ec52d694992bb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4899DA52.4@apache.org> <4aa34eb70808061019o77dc85cbg6b9ec52d694992bb@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What about releases? Does this mean that each sub-project will be released separately? If so, then the life of an administrator becomes even more harder :-). he has to pick and choose each package, verify whether they are compatible with one another, run various installation utilities to install them, etc.etc. -dhruba On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > +1. > > -dhruba > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> +1 >> >> I agree that it is time to do this. Should we start using Ivy, so that the >> inter-dependencies are easier to manage? >> >> Doug >> >> Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: >>> >>> 1. Core (src/core) >>> 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) >>> 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) >>> >>> There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools >>> and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate jiras >>> and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the community >>> much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 is >>> released to give us time to plan the split. >>> >>> -- Owen >> > From general-return-21-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 20:37:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 17702 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 20:37:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 20:37:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13953 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13934 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13923 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 20:36:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:36:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:36:01 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m76KaFLZ063922 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=0IhEodC1G6qFQX31UXTQt7+UvF/rYr/BuaVO2f0ily4pP8EUeEQzonyO3MqpOKz3 Message-Id: <787AD7EE-369C-42B5-A99E-A75CEB6673E5@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70808061329h35964613i5a75cc33780749bb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:36:15 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4899DA52.4@apache.org> <4aa34eb70808061019o77dc85cbg6b9ec52d694992bb@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb70808061329h35964613i5a75cc33780749bb@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun >>> Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>> >>>> I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: >>>> >>>> 1. Core (src/core) >>>> 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) >>>> 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) >>>> >>>> There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do >>>> with tools >>>> and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create >>>> separate jiras >>>> and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the >>>> community >>>> much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 >>>> is >>>> released to give us time to plan the split. >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>> >> From general-return-22-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 06 20:55:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29061 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2008 20:55:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2008 20:55:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 32983 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32964 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2008 20:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27494 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2008 20:49:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=nCmTGYZjyez7IJpNhYCiAgzAeg0/A7xEjnSVKgE4lHvFXAgceCjyZs84St1cXsxnrf7fbfB2RMZtOWDDustefT1g/Z4R6LPpOjhwB3/xdBy+LOW7KgolNoWrFSbwqFawmYJmBXXcYLrDEObN3Zw9Eu7+3BC5rSRTo2jNPFPydJU=; X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1042.48 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:48:27 -0700 (PDT) From: lohit Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <394209.75538.qm@web53604.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On similar note, would Core continue to have things not part of HDFS and Map/Reduce? Would it still be called core. Map/reduce and HDFS are supposed to be 'core' of hadoop, right :) -Lohit ----- Original Message ---- From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 1:36:15 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? +1 Arun >>> Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>> >>>> I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: >>>> >>>> 1. Core (src/core) >>>> 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) >>>> 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) >>>> >>>> There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do >>>> with tools >>>> and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create >>>> separate jiras >>>> and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the >>>> community >>>> much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 >>>> is >>>> released to give us time to plan the split. >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>> >> From general-return-23-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 07 21:30:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 55580 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2008 21:30:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2008 21:30:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 72186 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2008 21:30:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72169 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2008 21:30:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72158 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2008 21:30:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:30:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.231] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:29:56 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1070962rvb.29 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=xLG2BUalTgO2VVhjnhcwZehXmreEinoX/sjs+GJhAuw=; b=bHIcNnBKoSLs7G+FeKxHb4T5SCOINM0WoX4GZk2hvxUqdc+/c2jjvEk1uDIEDnz/17 EWdB8Z4ptu3pxgnz3/3Mmq01AUCw1EAF8w4IN5OVRzJuIvN1YGEzzgY+myvI0Ezqf5oc 0VhSsiyHT42jiUTkUoDCslRS0iwzpsOhgYe8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=jw0ba3T9oQ2Fla0W+k4S92JD0GORlEj8n9h5e5owj3ZczEIqzzAgwwmAH+sk6SH43P T7/PYrMNMgSL2ikTgBoSSjo27AY1i4EASRvOeEN7L8UTmpYkgO5hhO65dtCnsVxxvaVH cVWftBteWS4eck+HQwp0HwnTb+WSJBe0PrDts= Received: by 10.140.166.21 with SMTP id o21mr934012rve.254.1218144624386; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? ( [76.103.181.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm348086rvb.4.2008.08.07.14.30.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489B696E.8090504@apache.org> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:30:22 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <4899DA52.4@apache.org> <4aa34eb70808061019o77dc85cbg6b9ec52d694992bb@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb70808061329h35964613i5a75cc33780749bb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70808061329h35964613i5a75cc33780749bb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > What about releases? Does this mean that each sub-project will be > released separately? Yes. Although we might coordinate and release in waves. It would increase the importance of back-compatibility. > If so, then the life of an administrator becomes > even more harder :-). he has to pick and choose each package, verify > whether they are compatible with one another, run various installation > utilities to install them, etc.etc. We intend to use Ivy assist with compatibility. It would be silly release a new X version A that requires Y version B if Y version B has not yet been released. So upgrading should not be any harder than it is today: to upgrade mapreduce you might need to upgrade hdfs to a compatible version. Today you always have to upgrade both. So, in some cases, upgrades should get easier, since not everything need be upgraded at once. Doug From general-return-24-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 07 23:24:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 16310 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2008 23:24:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2008 23:24:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16000 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2008 23:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15983 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2008 23:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15972 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2008 23:24:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:24:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:23:45 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m77NMLjp091830 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=u7ysTfUwVlOKMhjoxaw17/Yjl2wbfOKEwS/Hz/mbMngQVegqZqWe7+Fu29YVbqTL Message-Id: <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:22:20 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So we'll need to create and maintain 3 patch processes, one for each component? Not a trivial amount of work given the way the patch process is currently structured. How will unit tests be divided? For instance, will all three have to have MiniDFSCluster and other shared test infrastructure? We can use Ivy now to manage dependencies on outside libraries. We can build separate jars for mapred, hdfs, and core right now. We can use email filters to reduce inbox emails. We can use TestNG to categorize our tests and narrow the number of unit tests run for each component. -1 until I better understand the benefit of making the split. Nige On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:18 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: > > 1. Core (src/core) > 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) > 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) > > There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with > tools and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create > separate jiras and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will > make the community much more approachable. I would propose that we > wait until 0.19.0 is released to give us time to plan the split. > > -- Owen From general-return-25-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 08 05:24:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 832 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2008 05:24:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2008 05:24:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 81073 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 05:24:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81050 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 05:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81039 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2008 05:24:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:24:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.184] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:23:58 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so561089fkx.13 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:24:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=q/ebHjCQuz4QxTEjlGjbS7VWowUtrFbL+v5yzvOimBQ=; b=Kxa0BbKtpKHw+YrJ2l1wyvb9kZV8yIITOCnVAYHQSffSY1djjqzLqhbpcnQNLw9QWa CHUSqZIwanSIbjTIEdaBHfAwObkN6WBuoEqyDGsPjd8+8Bs+21b76s+vSRMv/uRuoekZ UTtpGtJfXxqDnRRIP+BQ7T0SaNVLZetzFVwR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=x4pgAGSRqM/FJChBME06nEzQi+4lhjLZCk4+jmtxGkVbyjGpqVsp/Jojx5uNwQxsd7 /aREsF7ZyAikLhNnO1FP8/OSJlBgMDIXi8+vhYf5vHtLl2rQbpV9o4w8YT3HG4KTVHSO eT80y8UhirUKnwMZ1dGohNvtmGc8lIIn7YuMQ= Received: by 10.180.213.14 with SMTP id l14mr1938371bkg.55.1218173048177; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.125.155.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70808072224h1c77aab2vd87c1d475a435171@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:24:08 -0800 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I too am "-1" on this one. I think we should try to see if some of the pieces in contrib deserve being a subproject but we can keep hdfs and map-reduce together. I think it reduces complexity from a deployment perspective too. If we can use the "component" of the JIRA in the subject of the email, then it leads itself to very easy email filtering. Does anyone know (or advice me) on how to make the "component" be part of the email subject? thanks, dhruba On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > So we'll need to create and maintain 3 patch processes, one for each > component? Not a trivial amount of work given the way the patch process is > currently structured. > > How will unit tests be divided? For instance, will all three have to have > MiniDFSCluster and other shared test infrastructure? > > We can use Ivy now to manage dependencies on outside libraries. > We can build separate jars for mapred, hdfs, and core right now. > We can use email filters to reduce inbox emails. > We can use TestNG to categorize our tests and narrow the number of unit > tests run for each component. > > -1 until I better understand the benefit of making the split. > > Nige > > On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:18 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> I think the time has come to split Hadoop Core into three pieces: >> >> 1. Core (src/core) >> 2. HDFS (src/hdfs) >> 3. Map/Reduce (src/mapred) >> >> There will be lots of details to work out, such as what we do with tools >> and contrib, but I think it is a good idea. This will create separate jiras >> and mailing lists for HDFS and map/reduce, which will make the community >> much more approachable. I would propose that we wait until 0.19.0 is >> released to give us time to plan the split. >> >> -- Owen > > From general-return-26-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 08 09:08:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 78788 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2008 09:08:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2008 09:08:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15607 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 09:08:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15591 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 09:08:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15580 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2008 09:08:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:08:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.227] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:07:46 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1437819rvb.29 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FkExk3uPKrttl8lyqvOhHNdaJbpgUEexNbDYNo8NClo=; b=RrD170B6CPZnJm3wQEiiNn9L7wtlxrDsDYSAp+lu+o5N2D3iZ6gOmGu+weXegBGouM gmvHzxWPre9LwO0mFBp7aYVwxgfScX0hC8uEb7b0we+lvMfDvv0z7jiGSRHHNwhCvT05 En3MgO6iiE7XjOEHkJvUmcH4k5wTu2Cpi+fYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qCHi7LJ3jXUSqNm9S4DXbhx30Gciv34nyEKBFBulg/BYzzsCZmDan6boo0jT05J8t/ 8ygy+a/RNg/4y/18rwBKQU1FE+wbIKlJXWKf22yQy1H7DBi0pttiXstqTw7WIYVnBS/l T2NfJIrNIxa2oheKxx3uY5+Gsn8aefzE31JvI= Received: by 10.141.141.3 with SMTP id t3mr1296534rvn.124.1218186493515; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.132.6 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:08:13 +0100 From: "Tom White" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I was initially concerned about the overhead of having to install separate packages for each component, but in some ways it will make things clearer. Folks on the user list are often asking how to use HDFS by itself for instance - or even if it is possible. By splitting it up it would make it clear that HDFS and MapReduce can be used without the other (although of course, they are best used together). Also, I can see some benefit from having separate configuration for HDFS and MapReduce, since it will make the configuration files smaller and more manageable (something like hdfs-(default|site).xml, mapreduce-(default|site).xml). It's not totally clear to me how Core fits into this. It's just a jar file and doesn't have daemons, so it should be bundled with the MapReduce and HDFS releases, shouldn't it? Nigel Daley wrote: > How will unit tests be divided? For instance, will all three have to have > MiniDFSCluster and other shared test infrastructure? Today the tests for core, hdfs and mapred are under one source tree because they are so tightly intertwined. I think the goal should be to have independent unit tests for each module, as well as integration tests that test that MapReduce works with HDFS. We should do this even if we don't split the projects. Tom From general-return-27-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 08 20:07:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 31900 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2008 20:07:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2008 20:07:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 40581 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 20:07:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40554 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2008 20:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40540 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2008 20:07:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:07:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.224] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:06:11 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1902465rvb.29 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=0U9Y6sanHJvFdamwbNtY3bii2QHl01rJaKoyMPf5Yq0=; b=k6OdpeVTGHSSBmEpVAOumUF0NTehogRsL2uv/7o4Lv3zLHx+IwtEpSzE1BIxMbHqw4 aMBUwKJMLU03azIWs3CVW6et3cD9Q1xMEXiO8dRD2CPB7YgtmJbaWnnRIMrDsus6PjUU FwCXI/O0tFfaDb1RoeP8TpNSoaXXqlrvyuYoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=U3l2F71QsbEYmtvwT6m9Sbi4fl8vGuxI7jy9tXonCTmud3O8fs2oTRYFrR9CCaVDn8 XdsBEPKSAaikrK0yvo/pSo2+CPPJ/tccbr1ccbK27zUDiw5JMZ3/HqC6u5KkcHRmcKJx U7BV6iSaljgINlleKwDowBvymSnfZCgyq9TgM= Received: by 10.141.88.3 with SMTP id q3mr1674688rvl.3.1218225999073; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? ( [76.103.181.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm2568874rvf.8.2008.08.08.13.06.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:06:39 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nigel Daley wrote: > How will unit tests be divided? For instance, will all three have to > have MiniDFSCluster and other shared test infrastructure? The HDFS project can release an hdfs-test.jar file that contains MiniDFSCluster. This will be used by mapred tests. Similarly, mapred will release a mapred-test.jar that contains MiniMRCluster, which can be used by hdfs tests. There is a circular dependency, but only in the test code, not in the mapred or hdfs code itself. This is easy to enforce, since test code is not on the classpath when we compile non-test code. > -1 until I better understand the benefit of making the split. One benefit is that developers would spend less time reading messages about areas they're not interested in. The core-dev mailing list traffic is becoming unmanageable. Splitting these without splitting the project would mean that a split developer community would attempt to build a coherent product, which sounds dangerous. Another benefit is that it would increase the separation of these technologies, so that, e.g., folks could more easily run different versions of mapreduce on top of different versions of HDFS. Currently we make no such guarantees. Folks would be able to upgrade to, e.g., the next release of mapreduce on a subset of their cluster without upgrading their HDFS. That's not currently supported. As we move towards splitting mapreduce into a scheduler and runtime, where folks can specify a different runtime per job, this will be even more critical. We need to make this split eventually. Why not now? Doug From general-return-28-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 12 06:31:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 79878 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2008 06:31:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2008 06:31:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 68434 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2008 06:31:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68415 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2008 06:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68404 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2008 06:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:31:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alloe130@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.233] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:30:33 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c30so2191365wra.21 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=3JkkHWCQFi78vAeFrvEK3gWHPizsaA8zgW6ZHfBnP0M=; b=xa74sXKxbYrR4BKN6sMKK7DEAO7gjvfu+SzcEyZV6E2OjNBJmGbNEJ6YDVBLCycEw8 b8frObERUC2Fmk9r6lt4/BJifAxQMvboyax8tNOeuszhkZHeTBV2QPVCwaYNAzfRLzcA Iabz0R6QP6wRfgSkxdnFrZ2wpgaKWENs7yo/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=f0by//4nSVRylzerVYLj0lFckzZ8stHQYidW5Hu073BtGt39L68zt0Tz7DGdskwEOx Qhk+oafE3BJ1gxc5cdKPnJexl/aFO3Q6ODsYYn4L6xdAnphFOlxgbXEcuwpu5NFeUKg0 xUTdentNSOuiwwuB/xG6vW2ncOGa9kD52nfJY= Received: by 10.90.55.9 with SMTP id d9mr9828599aga.23.1218522660116; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.113.12 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92adf0e80808112331q546ccaecrbe69a64edb942ed3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:31:00 +0900 From: "Donguk Choi" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: join MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_95802_30869858.1218522660122" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_95802_30869858.1218522660122 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline short mail -- Best. Regards, Donguk Choi http://www.alloes.com ------=_Part_95802_30869858.1218522660122-- From general-return-29-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 15 21:00:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 14884 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2008 21:00:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2008 21:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 99605 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2008 21:00:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99586 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2008 21:00:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99575 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2008 21:00:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:00:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.198.233] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:59:54 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1713249rvb.29 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.199.3 with SMTP id w3mr1772948rvf.67.1218834022802; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.174.4 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:00:22 -0700 From: "Brendan Miller" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: is it possible to commit if you have previously worked at google? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it possible to commit to hadoop given I have worked at google in the past and used the original mapreduce and bigtable to write applications? Would I need to seek google's permission, or have they already given blanket permission? Are there legal entanglements? Thanks From general-return-30-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 16 00:06:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 22331 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2008 00:06:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2008 00:06:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 47235 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 00:06:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47207 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 00:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47196 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2008 00:06:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:06:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:05:14 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.112.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m7G03qKO067119 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:03:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Ne2FCgl5FPNiG/3wEfpy/OrfEW78LwDyVE6mTeLIMtPWcWCJFDHdexKusK4E0iP5 Message-Id: <319EC963-8D5E-407F-B64B-EE3E6D208A85@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: is it possible to commit if you have previously worked at google? Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:03:52 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 15, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Brendan Miller wrote: > Is it possible to commit to hadoop given I have worked at google in > the past and used the original mapreduce and bigtable to write > applications? Would I need to seek google's permission, or have they > already given blanket permission? Are there legal entanglements? I am not a lawyer. In general, Apache doesn't care who your previous employers are. It is your responsibility to make sure that you don't contribute code that you aren't authorized to license to the ASF. A more appropriate forum for questions like this is legal-discuss@apache.org . -- Owen From general-return-31-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 16 19:28:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 65227 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2008 19:28:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2008 19:28:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 48456 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 19:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48429 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2008 19:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48418 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2008 19:28:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:28:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:27:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.165] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c108.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.108]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m7GJQbwF044552 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:26:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=AbpEuZyXo18R0NoXhrN5QDlw6tk/3Gy0aNleBXNXYzW1+t0QfWfPHLTalHQcVKaA Message-Id: <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:03:10 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Another benefit is that it would increase the separation of these > technologies, so that, e.g., folks could more easily run different > versions of mapreduce on top of different versions of HDFS. > Currently we make no such guarantees. Folks would be able to > upgrade to, e.g., the next release of mapreduce on a subset of their > cluster without upgrading their HDFS. That's not currently > supported. As we move towards splitting mapreduce into a scheduler > and runtime, where folks can specify a different runtime per job, > this will be even more critical. Sounds like we simply need to create separate jar files for these different components. This can be done in the current project. Wouldn't the amount of effort to make this split and get it right be better spent on getting all components of Hadoop to 1.0 (API stability)? The proposal feels like a distraction to me at this point in the project. Nige From general-return-3137-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 11:25:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56954 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 11:25:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 11:25:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2407 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 11:25:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2015 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 11:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1997 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 11:25:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:25:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:25:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D57B7DAE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:25:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4z--BdOIIvkN for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:25:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCA0B7D76 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:25:02 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1299583490.87877@U17CPSQI4zf4BvpVRuE1jA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p21BOodP011534 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:24:50 GMT Message-ID: <4D6CD782.5090507@apache.org> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:24:50 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p21BOodP011534 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 27/02/11 01:38, Eric Yang wrote: > Instead of ant + > puppet combination, the patch test build structure could be simplified by > using maven + shell scripts. The trouble with any scripted approach vs state driven CM tooling is their inability to cope with a starting point that doesn't match the scripts assumptions. This isn't me picking on maven -different topic- more the CM problem. Lots of people do use shell scripts, and if your starting point is known -such as a golden VM image- it mostly works. Mostly. Even RPM installation (remember, it's scripts underneath) ensure that if you kickstart install and then update a thousand servers, they will end up executing their scripts in different orders, and so end up in different final states. Of course, the weakness of CM tools is that they often end up being given goals that can't be consistently satisfied, so they cycle between the set of sub-optimal configurations. From general-return-3138-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 17:06:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13551 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 17:06:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 17:06:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 78223 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:06:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77781 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:06:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77773 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 17:06:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:06:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:06:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 7778 invoked by uid 507); 2 Mar 2011 17:05:34 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.628193 secs); 02 Mar 2011 17:05:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 17:05:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BDB13245F8 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:05:33 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZG3sxt6j7B6a; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:05:32 -0500 (CST) Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu (ucimail4.uci.cu [10.0.0.185]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D2B13245A1 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:05:32 -0500 (CST) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:05:32 -0500 (CST) From: Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> Subject: Hadoop Development and the new Oracle's Plans MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.0.0.186] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64) Regards to all the list. I have a doubt in my mind since Oracle announced its new plans for Java.=20 1- How the new restrictions can affect to the Hadoop Development? 2- Will Hadoop support the new OpenJDK platform? Thanks a lot for your time --=20 Marcos Lu=C3=ADs Ort=C3=ADz Valmaseda Software Engineer=20 Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=C3=A1ticas Linux User # 418229 http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3139-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 23:41:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15692 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 23:41:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 23:41:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 6452 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 23:41:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5733 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 23:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5562 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 23:41:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:41:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:41:28 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so946853bwz.35 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:41:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=DoeEj2tbSqfr8AJMvwLoKdSfNs9QSZdBPz1s83cWdH8=; b=dnfRiXPuNSqsPmpTiKrgH923Y0sqc84sTHKx1Gu6LFfBYn6IrzRndvxXgJ0dkErOj0 /QaZVJy5KWgBho8ecRqCZkzamP6NlYi7dcw9M7RR+nddJtktrz6uMOsCC5dbee/91NzH oecCwVQvG88A5dtMtvm6vxj3lnATRDKLdT+J0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=dY9qFGvywI5ie9nl+sV3m+LTeeY4/WjyFUJxguFHruSgjuOIP6Fr+4X5h1+3320ZFC YrklFWDaLjw/8nylzkgq3fJfwvWNHZjFYaWRff/N0E2njInP+Jr2UReoQOVZT7OxYGIR rlQRP+Mfwj81kjU3xCPDskmAU2gTRqUP0grV4= Received: by 10.204.153.14 with SMTP id i14mr669742bkw.173.1299109268103; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:41:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.215 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:40:48 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:40:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Reminder: SF Hadoop meetup in 1 week To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ccf8a732156049d887209 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ccf8a732156049d887209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, As a reminder -- the third SF Hadoop meetup is one week away! We will meet on March 9th, from 6pm to 8pm. (We will hopefully continue using the 2nd Wednesday of the month for successive meetups). This meetup will be hosted by Yelp, at their office at 706 Mission St, San Francisco (3rd and Mission). Yelp has graciously offered to sponsor food & drinks for the event as well. Space is still available for more attendees! Yelp has asked that all attendees RSVP in advance, to comply with their security policy. Please join the meetup group and RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/16678757/ As per our emerging tradition, we will continue to use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All members of the Hadoop community are welcome to attend. While all Hadoop-related subjects are on topic, this month's discussion theme is "integration." Regards, - Aaron Kimball --0015175ccf8a732156049d887209-- From general-return-3140-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 10:43:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53284 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 10:43:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 10:43:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 58526 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 10:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58436 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 10:43:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58427 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 10:43:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:43:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:43:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260E9B7DA0 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:43:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AcxpAlLlNoYk for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:43:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F20B7D93 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:43:13 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1299753781.60345@AHFYjg8fu3a+DTi1R7aZZQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p23Ah1Fr013847 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:43:01 GMT Message-ID: <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:43:01 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Development and the new Oracle's Plans References: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> In-Reply-To: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p23Ah1Fr013847 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 02/03/11 17:05, Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote: > Regards to all the list. > I have a doubt in my mind since Oracle announced its new plans for Java. The ASF has left the JCP due to Sun and then Oracles unwillingness to release the Java test kit without imposing freedom of use restrictions on Apache source code, despite the JCP rules not permitting this. that doesn't mean the ASF is backing off Java development, merely backing off attempting to collaborate with others by way of a Standards body that has more in common with the peoples congress of the union of soviet socialist republics than with a functional democracy. We will work as open source projects, with all discussion, code and tests in the open. > 1- How the new restrictions can affect to the Hadoop Development? none, Apache code. Sun/Oracle are free to participate; some of the SunGrid people have been involved in the past. Their contributions are still welcome, if Hudson/Jenkins is happy with the code and the number of tests they provide. > 2- Will Hadoop support the new OpenJDK platform? OpenJDK 6 is effectively Sun JDK with a different rendering engine, the closed source one has C/C++ source from things like OSF/Motif and the like in there so it's copyright is dirty. I don't see anyone rushing to move to Java7 for Hadoop in production, either in source code or binary. Everyone with large clusters likes stable versions, and tends to be trailing edge with Java 6 versions, avoiding new features like compressed oops as you can predict that with 500+ 12-core servers, if there is a race condition in the JDK, you will find it. The other issue is that a lot of people out there use Mac laptops for their development, and until java7 ships for the mac, nobody who has a mac will be able to develop any Java 7 code. That's another reason for Hadoop staying on Java6 What could be interesting would be for Hadoop to have more scala integration. I think there are some good arguments for us moving some of the high level code to that language, within the JVM, rather than follow the oracle roadmap. Speaking of Oracle Roadmaps, they keep talking about Java EE moving to be cloud computing. Well, the Java Cloud Computing API is the ASF stack, from libraries like Whirr to talk to the infrastructure, the Hadoop DFS and MR APIs to talk to the filesystem and MR engine, and the layers on top. They can lay down some standards in the JCP, but out here you get to build things that are useful today. -steve From general-return-3141-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 13:59:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95561 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 13:59:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 13:59:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 49946 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 13:59:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49885 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 13:59:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49877 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 13:59:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:59:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:59:27 +0000 Received: by vws20 with SMTP id 20so1230367vws.35 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:59:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=1SRKOZXmf7/ldZf53Mdu1pgLKti/DVP4Ek0yVY67lqs=; b=PZNpDOURZ3YqfMWYGIcdxjKLsBANIoCQYFEI72A/cgRWP33KUQfmuXhkHNrIUpBolR ZcUrGpqtfsha/bk6rG39xi/PtDOsliEsZpoIWspCSxUdI1nDhy5s+uBTTXmpa11qYMDv HgLe8RzMLl5su0cyUc0dCjRSFzWeg5kAFA4VA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=phHC6z4aLBEjfjC8lLebcOZ1Ou+KSqDw66v16lj14MvXOZ/DBCKU7tLEuP1pL9dpke T0QGJvS7xYrq4tHlFxrx6opS9RJNiOd066crztpAaFwZkMFIP3E4jt1xZjpHoR/4jttk VV0MbtoXTcPzsOGMqZOuuVnIQRbTa9jeM9sHM= Received: by 10.52.161.67 with SMTP id xq3mr1832289vdb.57.1299160746585; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.79] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b18sm483560vcm.16.2011.03.03.05.59.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:59:05 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:59:04 -0500 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I just discovered this Apache site,=20 Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it = looks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put the = hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. Regards Ian -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman To know recursion, you must first know recursion. From general-return-3142-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:40:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42914 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:40:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:40:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 38379 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38282 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38125 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:40:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:40:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:39:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 17402 invoked by uid 507); 3 Mar 2011 16:39:29 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.184 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.184):. Processed in 0.625812 secs); 03 Mar 2011 16:39:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail3.uci.cu) (10.0.0.184) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:39:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94D51E8C021 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:39:28 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail3.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail3.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZueyPYirLQT; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:39:25 -0500 (CST) Received: from [10.7.2.15] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.7.2.15]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D409E1E8C007 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:39:24 -0500 (CST) Subject: Re: Hadoop Development and the new Oracle's Plans From: Marcos Ortiz To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> References: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:40:26 -0430 Message-ID: <1299168626.3413.1.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks a lot for the excellent response. Regards. On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:43 +0000, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 02/03/11 17:05, Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote: > > Regards to all the list. > > I have a doubt in my mind since Oracle announced its new plans for Java. > > The ASF has left the JCP due to Sun and then Oracles unwillingness to > release the Java test kit without imposing freedom of use restrictions > on Apache source code, despite the JCP rules not permitting this. that > doesn't mean the ASF is backing off Java development, merely backing off > attempting to collaborate with others by way of a Standards body that > has more in common with the peoples congress of the union of soviet > socialist republics than with a functional democracy. We will work as > open source projects, with all discussion, code and tests in the open. > > > > > 1- How the new restrictions can affect to the Hadoop Development? > > none, Apache code. > > Sun/Oracle are free to participate; some of the SunGrid people have been > involved in the past. Their contributions are still welcome, if > Hudson/Jenkins is happy with the code and the number of tests they > provide. > > > 2- Will Hadoop support the new OpenJDK platform? > > > OpenJDK 6 is effectively Sun JDK with a different rendering engine, the > closed source one has C/C++ source from things like OSF/Motif and the > like in there so it's copyright is dirty. > > I don't see anyone rushing to move to Java7 for Hadoop in production, > either in source code or binary. Everyone with large clusters likes > stable versions, and tends to be trailing edge with Java 6 versions, > avoiding new features like compressed oops as you can predict that with > 500+ 12-core servers, if there is a race condition in the JDK, you will > find it. > > The other issue is that a lot of people out there use Mac laptops for > their development, and until java7 ships for the mac, nobody who has a > mac will be able to develop any Java 7 code. That's another reason for > Hadoop staying on Java6 > > What could be interesting would be for Hadoop to have more scala > integration. I think there are some good arguments for us moving some of > the high level code to that language, within the JVM, rather than follow > the oracle roadmap. > > Speaking of Oracle Roadmaps, they keep talking about Java EE moving to > be cloud computing. Well, the Java Cloud Computing API is the ASF stack, > from libraries like Whirr to talk to the infrastructure, the Hadoop DFS > and MR APIs to talk to the filesystem and MR engine, and the layers on > top. They can lay down some standards in the JCP, but out here you get > to build things that are useful today. > > -steve -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3143-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:42:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44999 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:42:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:42:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 50658 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50606 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50593 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:42:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 18723 invoked by uid 507); 3 Mar 2011 16:42:22 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.184 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.184):. Processed in 0.679263 secs); 03 Mar 2011 16:42:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail3.uci.cu) (10.0.0.184) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:42:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269B61E8C037; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:42:21 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail3.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail3.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WcsLKIktQUD7; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:42:20 -0500 (CST) Received: from [10.7.2.15] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.7.2.15]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CBD1E8C033; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:42:20 -0500 (CST) Subject: Re: Hadoop Development and the new Oracle's Plans From: Marcos Ortiz To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Steve Loughran In-Reply-To: <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> References: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:43:21 -0430 Message-ID: <1299168801.3413.3.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > What could be interesting would be for Hadoop to have more scala > integration. I think there are some good arguments for us moving some of > the high level code to that language, within the JVM, rather than follow > the oracle roadmap. About this topic, Steve, Is there any development focused on this theme? It´s a interesting project to work. Regards -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3144-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 17:35:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34607 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 17:35:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 17:35:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10186 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:35:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9953 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9945 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 17:35:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:35:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:35:09 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so1711413wwi.29 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:34:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.245.195 with SMTP id o45mr1347223wer.15.1299173687169; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:34:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:34:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:34:26 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GYIjRsW83TMniB96nP9aMMO6wWc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ian, Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late 2009, I believe. I had asked INFRA folks on a few occasions about adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything back. I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen eventuall= y. -- =A0 Thanks in advance, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: > I just discovered this Apache site, > Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it looks= pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. > > If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put the h= adoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. > > Regards > Ian > -- > Ian Holsman > Ian@Holsman.net > PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman > > To know recursion, you must first know recursion. > > > > From general-return-3145-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 18:12:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49304 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 18:12:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 18:12:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 36192 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36090 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36082 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:12:23 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=JZGOjQ79uqUsXJg299cdtlPuMFhrWKemuhgwV3n9mNqpCSzTXOfiHB5w fJSxZAm9vYJpo6h2RkLk457nTZiwNM2UUTwwHmvfrW7dDNDMozMiQbYKI 1PgmeCKvgz+k2Qm; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1299175937; x=1330711937; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Apache=20Sonar=20-=20http://analysis.ap ache.org/=20does=20anyone=20want=0D=0A=20hadoop=20in=20th ere?|Date:=20Thu,=203=20Mar=202011=2018:13:52=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<68222B35484EE04F9365A532D454284D@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=I7wNsr4drbEZLTU97dbE8yxTZM08E4PpzuIBdXNofzc=; b=aWFon0FUMMpdE4RHXHlRGt0/EKSjRy+sPMuuaKb56wteYW83X6t2vL5P jiUcAg/D3XH2AIN1GkOAnfVN1jumdTPtcAirlUN990S0Sh8uhY/dsSJsY mhcXLXeHAo8oT/v; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,259,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="21308623" Received: from ESV4-EXC03.linkedin.biz ([fe80::985a:a6b4:f1e1:23b0]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:13:52 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? Thread-Topic: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? Thread-Index: AQHL2at+eyfgXZDy0EeiMzwlXMfL7JQcb7yA Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:13:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <68222B35484EE04F9365A532D454284D@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I just discovered this Apache site,=20 > Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it looks= pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. Is it actually returning for anyone else? I get a time out. From general-return-3146-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 18:17:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55106 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 18:17:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 18:17:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 54421 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 18:17:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54367 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 18:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54358 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 18:17:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:17:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:17:00 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=I7gIVzLXh25CrHtxFngpMw5VTQcBY51fjuUwUAcLlrQUqN5JBTiCEk4Y Q8Oxw0i7rAHzvsiJDaFWSbWofXasyq4tGhI++9BWKgLpg0Te4IZ+3EzVg BfmDHRjg6bv9Tdv; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1299176214; x=1330712214; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Apache=20Sonar=20-=20http://analysis.ap ache.org/=20does=20anyone=20want=0D=0A=20hadoop=20in=20th ere?|Date:=20Thu,=203=20Mar=202011=2018:18:31=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<2756B26FF85689488C1A00B8272AD03E@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20; bh=gJ5X10pxa6LVn/BhqHY29Ggun8kPT8zFEM2ybY3zb3g=; b=aWwVSF+QCYHBZEWJP42DUzBLX8pJfPlkM60iFpAlYhCon7lak6fNjLlu cUo3UB8PcdfG5TN2JHW74FtYFr+Sz9KzZXera427TS+XvX5aXWK26mFXg /3aHTS1P80AvV6A; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,259,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="21308817" Received: from ESV4-EXC03.linkedin.biz ([fe80::985a:a6b4:f1e1:23b0]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:18:32 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? Thread-Topic: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? Thread-Index: AQHL2at+eyfgXZDy0EeiMzwlXMfL7JQcb7yAgAABToA= Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:18:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2756B26FF85689488C1A00B8272AD03E@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 3, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >> I just discovered this Apache site,=20 >> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it look= s pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >=20 > Is it actually returning for anyone else? I get a time out. >=20 It took a few tries, but it finally came back. From general-return-3147-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 21:05:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52578 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 21:05:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 21:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 89503 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89461 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89452 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 21:05:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:05:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:05:14 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] (mayvarious-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.184.42]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p23L4EmA008347 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:04:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1299186254; bh=nvpZt47a5krUwhSC2TBNx9Xw+1bFU7c+VRGxMtecL+w=; h=Message-Id:From:To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date: References; b=Mg9MIcNDI1WEoGUWGYOCrh0IK7NoaWyvcsVvA/7CogPyndj3yQjN0TcLbe5rzwPQX kIbaEDmXTsdosjTg+2WseVM0LpQSGTDkjVzsUNUfZtAj77DUhHF2X3uueKqd1lmwp0 oO23g68L3IKzVgDaLFocDXTg4vy1J9j3uPGEKLy4= Message-Id: From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8-903990662 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Fwd: [Announce] Now Open: Call for Participation for ApacheCon North America Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:04:14 -0800 References: <959692.86880.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-8-903990662 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, Here's the call for presentations at ApacheCon 2011. -- Owen Begin forwarded message: > From: Sally Khudairi > Date: March 3, 2011 12:10:17 PM PST > To: "announce@apachecon.com" > Subject: [Announce] Now Open: Call for Participation for ApacheCon =20 > North America > Reply-To: "sk@apache.org" > > Call for Participation > ApacheCon North America 2011 > 7-11 November 2011 > Westin Bayshore, Vancouver, Canada > > All submissions must be received by Friday, 29 April 2011 at =20 > midnight Pacific Time. > > ApacheCon, the official conference, trainings, and expo of The =20 > Apache Software Foundation (ASF), heads to Vancouver, Canada, this =20 > November, with dozens of technical, business, and community-focused =20= > sessions for beginner, intermediate, and expert audiences. > > Now in its 11th year, the ASF develops and shepherds nearly 150 Top-=20= > Level Projects and new initiatives in the Apache Incubator and Labs. =20= > With hundreds of thousands of applications deploying ASF products =20 > and code contributions by more than 2,500 Committers from around the =20= > world, the Apache community is recognized as among the most robust, =20= > successful, and respected in Open Source. > > This year's ApacheCon focuses on highly-relevant, professionally-=20 > directed presentations that demonstrate specific problems and real-=20 > world solutions. We welcome proposals --from developers and users =20 > alike-- in the areas of "Apache and ...": > > ... Enterprise Solutions (from ActiveMQ to Axis2 to ServiceMix, =20 > OFBiz to Chemistry, the gang's all here!) > > ... Cloud Computing (Hadoop, Cassandra, HBase, CouchDB, and friends) > > ... Emerging Technologies + Innovation (Incubating projects such as =20= > Libcloud, Stonehenge, and Wookie) > > ... Community Leadership (mentoring and meritocracy, GSoC and =20 > related initiatives) > > ... Data Handling, Search + Analytics (Lucene, Solr, Mahout, OODT, =20 > Hive and friends) > > ... Pervasive Computing (Felix/OSGi, Tomcat, MyFaces Trinidad, and =20 > friends) > > ... Servers, Infrastructure + Tools (HTTP Server, SpamAssassin, =20 > Geronimo, Sling, Wicket and friends) > > > Submissions are open to anyone with relevant expertise: ASF =20 > affiliation is not required to present at, attend, or otherwise =20 > participate in ApacheCon. > > Whilst we encourage submissions that the highlight the use of =20 > specific Apache solutions, we are unable to accept marketing/=20 > commercially-oriented presentations. > > Other proposals, such as panels, have been considered in the past; =20 > you are welcome to submit an alternate presentation, however, such =20 > sessions are accepted under exceptional circumstances. Please be as =20= > descriptive as possible, including names/bios of proposed panelists =20= > and any related details. > > Accepted speakers (not co-presenters) qualify for general conference =20= > admission and a minimum of two nights lodging at the conference =20 > hotel. Additional hotel nights and travel assistance are possible, =20 > depending on the number of presentations given and type of =20 > assistance needed. > > To submit a presentation proposal, please complete our ONLINE =20 > SUBMISSION FORM at http://na11.apachecon.com/proposals/new > > To be considered, proposals must be received by Friday, 29 April =20 > 2011 at midnight Pacific Time. Please email any questions regarding =20= > proposal submissions to cfp AT apachecon DOT com. > > Key Dates: > > 3 March 2011 - CFP Opens > 29 April 2011 - CFP Closes > 20 May-30 June 2011 - Speaker Notifications and Confirmations > 7-11 November 2011 - ApacheCon NA 2011 > > > We look forward to seeing you in Vancouver! > > =96 The ApacheCon Planning team > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: announce-unsubscribe@apachecon.com > For additional commands, e-mail: announce-help@apachecon.com > --Apple-Mail-8-903990662-- From general-return-3148-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 13:00:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77230 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 13:00:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 13:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 5169 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 13:00:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5087 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 13:00:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5074 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 13:00:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:00:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:00:15 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so2582412wya.35 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 04:59:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TQwIGDoqeQWkAzBHJcwM/vyLU1ZPj7kAoslcBYe+EdY=; b=jPq0cU4wWMfz8scWWClz3NMN3UBC5yv0lQNdYqXWX3eHoYhwqU7nqFVaMwvshqIyVH bjClydJxsaozjtuT/NBjHwDuF0jGKdYOk4uJruGROqRlChevCISA+OTVvUbURq4iFuig a/FDZZd90Hv8B6nQ6qtViysfvlq6M3lKWPxn4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FqT1U+CR8wu5ucU8tlrjN0Ajp4avHTfrYp3wEcUTDNLVzE7rvACV63jmwoRH8m5Xwc iguFtTg7IsjytFVJHoVpg3k1ZKHhYXfgs3IPLr1QSWf3gwyjXijm353BHvMoLN/UBAmt RR9sVwy4Zd4i2JSmKtNvpyr2iwa5DXuoky3Jg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.19 with SMTP id q19mr546515wel.53.1299243595221; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 04:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.201 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 04:59:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:59:55 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: How i can test a Job finished and sucess in java From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b60fef84b0a049da7b8a1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b60fef84b0a049da7b8a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hello all .. i writte mapreduce in java . It works very well. How i know a Job finished and sucess in java ? JobConf conf = new JobConf(AverageJob.class); conf.setJobName("AverageProductTime"); FileInputFormat.addInputPath(conf, new Path(inputDir)); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(outputDir)); conf.setMapperClass(MapAverage.class); conf.setReducerClass(RedAverage.class); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(IntWritable.class); JobClient.runJob(conf); if (JobClient.SUCCESS == 0) { ... do someting ... } ???? Thanks --0016e65b60fef84b0a049da7b8a1-- From general-return-3149-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 13:52:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70223 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 13:52:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 13:52:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 68541 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 13:52:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68489 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 13:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68481 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 13:52:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:52:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:52:12 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2805060fxm.35 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:51:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=0PJEevogRaosjm/3H6rL9ANLubAmhpc9w1z1rAH9vzY=; b=k4dMInydm2qnKTFTtY5EVrH6zmygZmxa1/0VKH2PmMeIYQOYi0xGPP5/cbDALwcMgb EUdHWgqLjczRS/P6AaIQ6X4oNKGIDdGkkk+5dM1tjVkYy4iAjtNgUE+RqWDL9GL4q77i Ikwvi5ZtPaWO1SS2qM6xM+tpxX398nRlM4Hpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=lAvKBA63eiPKzk+MZLcvt9mXaQp0cZOnjDZ2warCcVCGj9fAHp3Od8sN1DFiKCXypk g3H/Q7hM4AA91N2gLHzoFxZCpFdqLQNXijEUlelW1hDWUw6iACugDXiEwh+uNRvk71bS regW9sm/pNgCz3tIgv2W5cNYjaMPDPdW5OuF8= Received: by 10.223.7.26 with SMTP id b26mr816245fab.119.1299246710760; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:51:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.83 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:49:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:19:35 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How i can test a Job finished and sucess in java To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > ???? > > Thanks > JobClient.runJob returns a RunningJob object at. Use that to determine the result. Please see: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/RunningJob.html#isSuccessful() -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-3150-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 15:42:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20846 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 15:42:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 15:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 57251 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57162 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:42:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56998 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 15:42:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:42:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:42:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 23948 invoked by uid 507); 4 Mar 2011 15:41:45 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.184 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.184):. Processed in 0.023453 secs); 04 Mar 2011 15:41:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail3.uci.cu) (10.0.0.184) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 15:41:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586D61E8C047; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:41:45 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail3.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail3.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PuLKmVwBVAAg; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:41:43 -0500 (CST) Received: from [10.36.18.44] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.44]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6CEB49065; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:41:43 -0500 (CST) Message-ID: <4D710873.4080003@uci.cu> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:42:43 -0500 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Alessandro Binhara Subject: Re: How i can test a Job finished and sucess in java References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org El 3/4/2011 7:59 AM, Alessandro Binhara escribió: > hello all .. > > i writte mapreduce in java . It works very well. > How i know a Job finished and sucess in java ? > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(AverageJob.class); > conf.setJobName("AverageProductTime"); > > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(conf, new Path(inputDir)); > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(outputDir)); > > conf.setMapperClass(MapAverage.class); > conf.setReducerClass(RedAverage.class); > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > conf.setOutputValueClass(IntWritable.class); > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > if (JobClient.SUCCESS == 0) > { > ... do someting ... > } > > ???? > > Thanks > > Regards, Alessandro. I 'm going to use a example of the Pro Hadoop's book. On Chapter 2, Jason Venner explains the different ways to see the success of a certain job. The RunningJobs class has the right methods to do this. For example: logger.info("Launching the job..."); /** Send the job configuration to the framework * and request that the job be run. */ final RunningJob job = JobClient.runJob(conf); logger.info("The job has completed."); Jason says that one of the more useful methods is job.isSuccessful(). I recommend to you that you look on the Hadoop MapReduce API for this class.(RunningJob) From general-return-3151-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 23:05:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24394 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 23:05:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 23:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 62710 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:05:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62613 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62471 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 23:05:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:05:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:05:13 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so3282400wya.35 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.141.142 with SMTP id g14mr1114441wej.15.1299279893117; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:04:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:04:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1013602343.131299102932362.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> <661564799.1071299188134602.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:04:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LD93KX9wvd9fSlGJAYgDFwvTsMY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Looks like the same symptoms are affecting Common trunk builds https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/516/ Have our build env. has been changed recently? -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:36, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > That seems like settings.xml has been modified, but then it'd affect > other builds as well. Unless we are using different machines/users for > different component's builds. > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 13:41, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Anyone understand why we can't seem to publish to apache maven anymore? >> >> -Todd >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Hudson Server >> wrote: >>> See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/= 621/ >>> >>> #######################################################################= ############ >>> ########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###############= ############ >>> [...truncated 4464 lines...] >>> =A0 =A0[javac] Compiling 11 source files to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave= /workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/build-fi/system/test/classes >>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. >>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. >>> >>> jar-test-system: >>> >>> -do-jar-test: >>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Ha= doop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/build-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumente= d-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Ha= doop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/build-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumente= d-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar >>> >>> set-version: >>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/= Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/ivy >>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/= Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/ivy >>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/= Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/ivy >>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/= Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/ivy >>> >>> clean-sign: >>> >>> sign: >>> >>> signanddeploy: >>> >>> simpledeploy: >>> [artifact:install-provider] Installing provider: org.apache.maven.wagon= :wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-2:runtime >>> [artifact:deploy] Deploying to https://repository.apache.org/content/re= positories/snapshots >>> [artifact:deploy] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from apache.s= napshots.https >>> [artifact:deploy] Uploading: org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNA= PSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60.jar to apache.snapshots.https >>> [artifact:deploy] Uploaded 1741K >>> [artifact:deploy] An error has occurred while processing the Maven arti= fact tasks. >>> [artifact:deploy] =A0Diagnosis: >>> [artifact:deploy] >>> [artifact:deploy] Error deploying artifact 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-ma= pred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Failed to transfer file: https://repos= itory.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-ma= pred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60.jar. Return co= de is: 401 >>> >>> BUILD FAILED >>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tru= nk/build.xml:1528: Error deploying artifact 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapre= d:jar': Error deploying artifact: Failed to transfer file: https://reposito= ry.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapre= d/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60.jar. Return code = is: 401 >>> >>> Total time: 3 minutes 20 seconds >>> >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> STORE: saving artifacts >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> >>> >>> mv: cannot stat `build/*.tar.gz': No such file or directory >>> mv: cannot stat `build/test/findbugs': No such file or directory >>> mv: cannot stat `build/docs/api': No such file or directory >>> Build Failed >>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE >>> Recording fingerprints >>> Archiving artifacts >>> Recording test results >>> Publishing Javadoc >>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>> Email was triggered for: Failure >>> Sending email for trigger: Failure >>> >>> >>> >>> #######################################################################= ############ >>> ############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##################= ############ >>> No tests ran. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > From general-return-3152-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:22:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59307 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:22:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39605 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:22:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39504 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39487 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:22:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:22:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:22:38 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p250Lvga051061; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:21:57 -0800 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:21:55 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing Thread-Topic: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing Thread-Index: AcvayRnCmrdJOscJTrCDvSrF6QdZHwAAjtEg Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm lookin into it.. -Giri On 3/4/11 3:04 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > Looks like the same symptoms are affecting Common trunk builds > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/516/ > Have our build env. has been changed recently? > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >=20 > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:36, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> That seems like settings.xml has been modified, but then it'd affect >> other builds as well. Unless we are using different machines/users for >> different component's builds. >>=20 >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 13:41, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> Anyone understand why we can't seem to publish to apache maven anymore? >>>=20 >>> -Todd >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Hudson Server >>> wrote: >>>> See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit= /621/ >>>>=20 >>>> ######################################################################= ##### >>>> ######## >>>> ########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE >>>> ########################### >>>> [...truncated 4464 lines...] >>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Compiling 11 source files to >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/b >>>> uild-fi/system/test/classes >>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API= . >>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. >>>>=20 >>>> jar-test-system: >>>>=20 >>>> -do-jar-test: >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/b >>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/b >>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT-sources= .jar >>>>=20 >>>> set-version: >>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/i >>>> vy >>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/i >>>> vy >>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/i >>>> vy >>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/i >>>> vy >>>>=20 >>>> clean-sign: >>>>=20 >>>> sign: >>>>=20 >>>> signanddeploy: >>>>=20 >>>> simpledeploy: >>>> [artifact:install-provider] Installing provider: >>>> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-2:runtime >>>> [artifact:deploy] Deploying to >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>>> [artifact:deploy] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from >>>> apache.snapshots.https >>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploading: >>>> org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-2= 01103 >>>> 03.213523-60.jar to apache.snapshots.https >>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploaded 1741K >>>> [artifact:deploy] An error has occurred while processing the Maven art= ifact >>>> tasks. >>>> [artifact:deploy] =A0Diagnosis: >>>> [artifact:deploy] >>>> [artifact:deploy] Error deploying artifact >>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Faile= d to >>>> transfer file: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apach= e/had >>>> oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523= -60.j >>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>=20 >>>> BUILD FAILED >>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/tr= unk/b >>>> uild.xml:1528: Error deploying artifact >>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Faile= d to >>>> transfer file: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apach= e/had >>>> oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523= -60.j >>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>=20 >>>> Total time: 3 minutes 20 seconds >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> STORE: saving artifacts >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> mv: cannot stat `build/*.tar.gz': No such file or directory >>>> mv: cannot stat `build/test/findbugs': No such file or directory >>>> mv: cannot stat `build/docs/api': No such file or directory >>>> Build Failed >>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE >>>> Recording fingerprints >>>> Archiving artifacts >>>> Recording test results >>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>> Email was triggered for: Failure >>>> Sending email for trigger: Failure >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> ######################################################################= ##### >>>> ######## >>>> ############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) >>>> ############################## >>>> No tests ran. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3153-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:31:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94390 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:31:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:31:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 54012 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53877 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53861 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:31:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:31:04 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p250UUfW066528; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:30:30 -0800 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:30:28 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing Thread-Topic: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing Thread-Index: AcvayRnCmrdJOscJTrCDvSrF6QdZHwAAjtEgAABMcYY= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 It looks like settings.xml file is deleted by someone while cleaning the m2 repository (my guess). I ve copied it back. I'm triggering a build to verify this. -Giri On 3/4/11 4:21 PM, "Giridharan Kesavan" wrote: > I'm lookin into it.. > -Giri >=20 > On 3/4/11 3:04 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >=20 >> Looks like the same symptoms are affecting Common trunk builds >> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/516/ >> Have our build env. has been changed recently? >> -- >> =A0 Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>=20 >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:36, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> That seems like settings.xml has been modified, but then it'd affect >>> other builds as well. Unless we are using different machines/users for >>> different component's builds. >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 13:41, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>> Anyone understand why we can't seem to publish to apache maven anymore= ? >>>>=20 >>>> -Todd >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Hudson Server >>>> wrote: >>>>> See=20 >>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/62= 1/ >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 ##########################################################################>= >>>> # >>>>> ######## >>>>> ########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE >>>>> ########################### >>>>> [...truncated 4464 lines...] >>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Compiling 11 source files to >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> b >>>>> uild-fi/system/test/classes >>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated AP= I. >>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. >>>>>=20 >>>>> jar-test-system: >>>>>=20 >>>>> -do-jar-test: >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> b >>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> b >>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT-source= s.jar >>>>>=20 >>>>> set-version: >>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> i >>>>> vy >>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> i >>>>> vy >>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> i >>>>> vy >>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> i >>>>> vy >>>>>=20 >>>>> clean-sign: >>>>>=20 >>>>> sign: >>>>>=20 >>>>> signanddeploy: >>>>>=20 >>>>> simpledeploy: >>>>> [artifact:install-provider] Installing provider: >>>>> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-2:runtime >>>>> [artifact:deploy] Deploying to >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>>>> [artifact:deploy] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from >>>>> apache.snapshots.https >>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploading: >>>>>=20 org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110>= >>>> 3 >>>>> 03.213523-60.jar to apache.snapshots.https >>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploaded 1741K >>>>> [artifact:deploy] An error has occurred while processing the Maven >>>>> artifact >>>>> tasks. >>>>> [artifact:deploy] =A0Diagnosis: >>>>> [artifact:deploy] >>>>> [artifact:deploy] Error deploying artifact >>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fail= ed to >>>>> transfer file: >>>>>=20 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/ha>= >>>> d >>>>>=20 oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60.>= >>>> j >>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>=20 >>>>> BUILD FAILED >>>>>=20 /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk/>= >>>> b >>>>> uild.xml:1528: Error deploying artifact >>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fail= ed to >>>>> transfer file: >>>>>=20 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/ha>= >>>> d >>>>>=20 oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60.>= >>>> j >>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Total time: 3 minutes 20 seconds >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>> STORE: saving artifacts >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/*.tar.gz': No such file or directory >>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/test/findbugs': No such file or directory >>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/docs/api': No such file or directory >>>>> Build Failed >>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE >>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>> Recording test results >>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>> Email was triggered for: Failure >>>>> Sending email for trigger: Failure >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 ##########################################################################>= >>>> # >>>>> ######## >>>>> ############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) >>>>> ############################## >>>>> No tests ran. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3154-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:40:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33570 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:40:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 70824 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70645 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62289 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:35:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cos@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@cloudera.com In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:34:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: z_oWUpOsHHV_PDIrTC2dFHhRz2c Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Giridharan Kesavan , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks a lot Giri! I guess this is another reason to have CM in place for the build machines. On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 16:30, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > It looks like settings.xml file is deleted by someone while cleaning the = m2 > repository (my guess). I ve copied it back. > I'm triggering a build to verify this. > > -Giri > > > On 3/4/11 4:21 PM, "Giridharan Kesavan" wrote: > >> I'm lookin into it.. >> -Giri >> >> On 3/4/11 3:04 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >> >>> Looks like the same symptoms are affecting Common trunk builds >>> =C2=A0 https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/= 516/ >>> Have our build env. has been changed recently? >>> -- >>> =C2=A0 Take care, >>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:36, Konstantin Boudnik wrote= : >>>> That seems like settings.xml has been modified, but then it'd affect >>>> other builds as well. Unless we are using different machines/users for >>>> different component's builds. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 13:41, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>>> Anyone understand why we can't seem to publish to apache maven anymor= e? >>>>> >>>>> -Todd >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Hudson Server >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> See >>>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/6= 21/ >>>>>> >>>>>> > #########################################################################= #>>>>> > # >>>>>> ######## >>>>>> ########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE >>>>>> ########################### >>>>>> [...truncated 4464 lines...] >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0[javac] Compiling 11 source files to >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > b >>>>>> uild-fi/system/test/classes >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprec= ated API. >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for det= ails. >>>>>> >>>>>> jar-test-system: >>>>>> >>>>>> -do-jar-test: >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > b >>>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > b >>>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT-sourc= es.jar >>>>>> >>>>>> set-version: >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > i >>>>>> vy >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > i >>>>>> vy >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > i >>>>>> vy >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > i >>>>>> vy >>>>>> >>>>>> clean-sign: >>>>>> >>>>>> sign: >>>>>> >>>>>> signanddeploy: >>>>>> >>>>>> simpledeploy: >>>>>> [artifact:install-provider] Installing provider: >>>>>> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-2:runtime >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Deploying to >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from >>>>>> apache.snapshots.https >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploading: >>>>>> > org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-2011= 0>>>>> > 3 >>>>>> 03.213523-60.jar to apache.snapshots.https >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploaded 1741K >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] An error has occurred while processing the Maven >>>>>> artifact >>>>>> tasks. >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] =C2=A0Diagnosis: >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] >>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Error deploying artifact >>>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fai= led to >>>>>> transfer file: >>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/h= a>>>>> > d >>>>>> > oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60= .>>>>> > j >>>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>> >>>>>> BUILD FAILED >>>>>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trunk= />>>>> > b >>>>>> uild.xml:1528: Error deploying artifact >>>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fai= led to >>>>>> transfer file: >>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/h= a>>>>> > d >>>>>> > oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-60= .>>>>> > j >>>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>> >>>>>> Total time: 3 minutes 20 seconds >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>> STORE: saving artifacts >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/*.tar.gz': No such file or directory >>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/test/findbugs': No such file or directory >>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/docs/api': No such file or directory >>>>>> Build Failed >>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE >>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>> Email was triggered for: Failure >>>>>> Sending email for trigger: Failure >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > #########################################################################= #>>>>> > # >>>>>> ######## >>>>>> ############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) >>>>>> ############################## >>>>>> No tests ran. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>> >>>> >> > > From general-return-3155-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 05:49:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27213 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 05:49:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 05:49:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11633 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 05:49:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10418 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 05:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10294 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 05:49:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:49:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 05:49:24 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so3433508iwr.35 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:49:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.29.71 with SMTP id q7mr1743760icc.152.1299304144092; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:49:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.229.1 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:48:44 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:48:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Digital Signal Processing Library + Hadoop To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Roger Smith , general@hadoop.apache.org, Mahout Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6c32f6bd80049db5d137 --20cf303f6c32f6bd80049db5d137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Come on over to the Apache Mahout mailing list for a warm welcome at least. We don't have a lot of time series stuff but would be very interested in hearing more about what you need and would like to see if there are some common issues that we might work on together. On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Roger Smith wrote: > All - > I wonder if any of you have integrated a DSP library with Hadoop. > We are considering using Hadoop to processing time series data, but don't > want to write standard DSP functions. > > Roger. > --20cf303f6c32f6bd80049db5d137-- From general-return-3156-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 16:05:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65690 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 16:05:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 16:05:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 71172 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 16:04:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71111 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 16:04:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15265 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 05:05:49 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rogersmith1711@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JytTLjb0APXr9cb801/sQ507zcgdDkjPy23zD2HNUOY=; b=xVwnWihxtkR9hgt+pByytBRfvaz32KDJMyaGXPWa8daW/i4hnq/ecw0F+1OYxO8dTf F2zR/R9drNqlrj9YWsoMv62fgTBjCWdSKQffClxXxrqHq9KlG9+PiO/gbJXmm1ytdAZC I43RKPuA1vnkDBGCUpJW23RiRyInJrvKOgmms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Wjr3Z9XGtiDneYkD7GR2MpbsFrghNm1XflCE8ubbNe4N9nVcKWEe7TjPzR1nvY7jU0 RvbMHxFrRYg6jntvV2DqAZBaOZbnNX1e/izzh9IybeHUdhusJv/d7NtajRmP6vP8GDRO VdsGMPD7PikH5e9KJHi7zBvl8DnVxhxNcIpno= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:05:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Digital Signal Processing Library + Hadoop From: Roger Smith To: common-user , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3973ed7f866dd5049db535d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b3973ed7f866dd5049db535d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All - I wonder if any of you have integrated a DSP library with Hadoop. We are considering using Hadoop to processing time series data, but don't want to write standard DSP functions. Roger. --485b3973ed7f866dd5049db535d6-- From general-return-3157-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 21:30:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77416 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 21:30:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 21:30:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76338 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 21:30:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76279 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 21:30:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76268 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 21:30:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:30:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 21:30:18 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p25LTrYw028581 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 13:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (10.72.168.26) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 13:29:52 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <5E398D0F-ABCC-497B-939A-9213A5B3C7C4@mac.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 13:29:50 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <7F080B69-E0AE-4A38-9928-048377E73E72@yahoo-inc.com> References: <5E398D0F-ABCC-497B-939A-9213A5B3C7C4@mac.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Nigel, I liked your previous plan. Could you summarize your current plan? Are we now planning to leave inactive projects in place? Ship them as = source? =20 Seems like this still sends a confusing message. I'm all for removing = them from trunk in SVN, leaving a wiki link to their most recent state = and letting their contributors make a case to revive them in whatever = place they choose. Keeping projects with small constituencies in our tree seems counter = productive. E14 On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. And only include them as source in releases. >=20 > Nige=20 >=20 > On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Tom White wrote: >=20 >> For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we >> remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib >> component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what >> ZooKeeper does, for example. >>=20 >> Tom >>=20 >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann >> wrote: >>> -1. >>>=20 >>> Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better >>> (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within >>> the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop >>> community, which would be good. >>> If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, >>> it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop = again. >>>=20 >>> AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the >>> related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own >>> premises. >>>=20 >>> Bernd >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>>=20 >>>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched = (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_= launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components = out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. >>>>=20 >>>> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures = that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's = long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these = contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop = and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like = a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. = Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to = core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to = come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination = and file a jira. >>>>=20 >>>> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss = any). >>>>=20 >>>> Common Contrib: >>>> failmon >>>> hod >>>> test >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> MapReduce Contrib: >>>> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >>>> data_join >>>> dynamic-scheduler >>>> eclipse-plugin >>>> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >>>> gridmix >>>> index >>>> mrunit >>>> mumak >>>> raid >>>> sqoop >>>> streaming -- move to MR core? >>>> vaidya >>>> vertica >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> HDFS Contrib: >>>> fuse-dfs >>>> hdfsproxy >>>> thriftfs >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3158-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:13:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59113 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 30857 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30648 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30355 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:13:24 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so5746337bwz.35 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:13:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.227.193 with SMTP id jb1mr3761248bkb.157.1299535981171; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:13:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.208 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:12:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:12:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Konstantin Boudnik , Giridharan Kesavan , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It looks like something automated must be rming the settings.xml file. Maybe one of our builds has an "rm -Rf ~/.m2" in it or something? According to the docs I've found, we could also put this setting in $ANT_HOME/etc. Maybe that's a safer spot? Or put it in the spot in ~/.m2 but with permissions set to make it harder to remove? -Todd On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks a lot Giri! > I guess this is another reason to have CM in place for the build machines= . > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 16:30, Giridharan =A0Kesavan > wrote: >> It looks like settings.xml file is deleted by someone while cleaning the= m2 >> repository (my guess). I ve copied it back. >> I'm triggering a build to verify this. >> >> -Giri >> >> >> On 3/4/11 4:21 PM, "Giridharan Kesavan" wrote: >> >>> I'm lookin into it.. >>> -Giri >>> >>> On 3/4/11 3:04 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>> >>>> Looks like the same symptoms are affecting Common trunk builds >>>> =A0 https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/51= 6/ >>>> Have our build env. has been changed recently? >>>> -- >>>> =A0 Take care, >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 21:36, Konstantin Boudnik wrot= e: >>>>> That seems like settings.xml has been modified, but then it'd affect >>>>> other builds as well. Unless we are using different machines/users fo= r >>>>> different component's builds. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 13:41, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>>>> Anyone understand why we can't seem to publish to apache maven anymo= re? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Todd >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Hudson Server >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> See >>>>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/= 621/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ########################################################################= ##>>>>> >> # >>>>>>> ######## >>>>>>> ########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE >>>>>>> ########################### >>>>>>> [...truncated 4464 lines...] >>>>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Compiling 11 source files to >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> b >>>>>>> uild-fi/system/test/classes >>>>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated = API. >>>>>>> =A0 =A0[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jar-test-system: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -do-jar-test: >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> b >>>>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0[jar] Building jar: >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> b >>>>>>> uild-fi/system/hadoop-mapred-instrumented-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT-sour= ces.jar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> set-version: >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> i >>>>>>> vy >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> i >>>>>>> vy >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> i >>>>>>> vy >>>>>>> =A0 =A0 [copy] Copying 1 file to >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> i >>>>>>> vy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> clean-sign: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sign: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> signanddeploy: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> simpledeploy: >>>>>>> [artifact:install-provider] Installing provider: >>>>>>> org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-2:runtime >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Deploying to >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] [INFO] Retrieving previous build number from >>>>>>> apache.snapshots.https >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploading: >>>>>>> >> org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-201= 10>>>>> >> 3 >>>>>>> 03.213523-60.jar to apache.snapshots.https >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Uploaded 1741K >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] An error has occurred while processing the Maven >>>>>>> artifact >>>>>>> tasks. >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] =A0Diagnosis: >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] >>>>>>> [artifact:deploy] Error deploying artifact >>>>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fa= iled to >>>>>>> transfer file: >>>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/= ha>>>>> >> d >>>>>>> >> oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-6= 0.>>>>> >> j >>>>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUILD FAILED >>>>>>> >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/trun= k/>>>>> >> b >>>>>>> uild.xml:1528: Error deploying artifact >>>>>>> 'org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-mapred:jar': Error deploying artifact: Fa= iled to >>>>>>> transfer file: >>>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/= ha>>>>> >> d >>>>>>> >> oop/hadoop-mapred/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-mapred-0.23.0-20110303.213523-6= 0.>>>>> >> j >>>>>>> ar. Return code is: 401 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Total time: 3 minutes 20 seconds >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>>> STORE: saving artifacts >>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/*.tar.gz': No such file or directory >>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/test/findbugs': No such file or directory >>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `build/docs/api': No such file or directory >>>>>>> Build Failed >>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE >>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>> Email was triggered for: Failure >>>>>>> Sending email for trigger: Failure >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ########################################################################= ##>>>>> >> # >>>>>>> ######## >>>>>>> ############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) >>>>>>> ############################## >>>>>>> No tests ran. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> > --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3159-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 01:07:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52881 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 01:07:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 01:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 60849 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60753 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60738 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 01:07:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:07:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:07:12 +0000 Received: from pbug.corp.yahoo.com (pbug.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.231.185]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p2816GlN080691; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:06:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1299546376; bh=WaixdO1kWF61Ax1MM//BmBD5tPDvUdGCSyDjVBUJnm0=; h=Date:Message-Id:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To; b=UcMN9jcKJImY+fqMZhMkuETkVcih9QCV469uJRmay5JpZM3zzA8/9/eRx6lTHsYKE C7tpUlHUw6fqeJDVMUNEDr5M9w2ykh+2rPyUyaESbuOTmcI+t6iODH9pzpZzwjh/e7 CNF1yYmty03erinch7pzWR86ZdY73tPKrWPABjyc= Received: (from roelofs@localhost) by pbug.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id p2816G7n003542; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:06:16 -0800 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:06:16 -0800 Message-Id: <201103080106.p2816G7n003542@pbug.corp.yahoo.com> From: Greg Roelofs Reply-To: Greg Roelofs To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit - Build # 621 - Still Failing Cc: cos@apache.org, gkesavan@yahoo-inc.com, todd@cloudera.com In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [general@ moved to Bcc; this seems like a pure dev issue now.] Todd Lipcon wrote: > It looks like something automated must be rming the settings.xml file. > Maybe one of our builds has an "rm -Rf ~/.m2" in it or something? (probably "rm -rf") > Or put it in the spot in ~/.m2 but with permissions set to make it > harder to remove? I don't believe there's any combination of owner/perms that would protect it against "rm -rf" while still allowing the creation of the repository/ dir in there. Possibly the sticky bit or something similar (I think one of them prevents deletion of another user's files even if the directory has appropriate write-permissions), but I'm not sure even that would work. If the hypothetical "rm -rf" can be found, perhaps simply changing it to nuke only ~/.m2/repository would suffice? Or does settings.xml live below that? Restoring it as one of the first steps of a Hudson build is probably the best approach, though (especially if it's restored from svn or somewhere with change-history). Greg From general-return-3160-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 14:46:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17868 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 14:46:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 14:46:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2597 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1823 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1570 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 14:46:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:46:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of josh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:46:17 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6463861bwz.35 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:45:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.80.29 with SMTP id r29mr4380299bkk.195.1299594252500; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.53.202 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:24:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:24:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Digital Signal Processing Library + Hadoop From: Josh Patterson To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Roger Smith , general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roger, A basic time series construct is the "sliding" window in conjunction with sorted time/value data; A sample implementation is at my github: https://github.com/jpatanooga/Caduceus/tree/master/src/tv/floe/caduceus/hadoop/movingaverage There are two jobs in there, one that uses the shuffle and one that does not --- to illustrate the difference. I have a blog draft coming that accompanies this code, I'll follow up and send you a copy draft of it. >From that code you should be able to build out a more complex time series / DSP process (using it as base code), something along the lines of a 1NN classifier: https://openpdc.svn.codeplex.com/svn/Hadoop/Current%20Version/ https://openpdc.svn.codeplex.com/svn/Hadoop/Current%20Version/docs/openPDC%20Datamining%20Tools%20Guide.pdf https://openpdc.svn.codeplex.com/svn/Hadoop/Current%20Version/src/TVA/Hadoop/MapReduce/Datamining/SAX/SlidingTSClassifier_kNN.java I'm in the process of updating that older openPDC code to be more modern and modular for general data sources. Josh On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Roger Smith wrote: > All - > I wonder if any of you have integrated a DSP library with Hadoop. > We are considering using Hadoop to processing time series data, but don't > want to write standard DSP functions. > > Roger. > -- Twitter: @jpatanooga Solution Architect @ Cloudera hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com blog: http://jpatterson.floe.tv From general-return-3161-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 14:11:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93075 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 14:11:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 14:11:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 92312 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 14:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92249 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 14:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92241 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 14:11:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:11:07 +0000 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so458562qwd.35 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:10:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=3tOYKe5RrFXVhz8XkRzS0JYKieBIeW8GPDiEpEPafbI=; b=Im/So0lZwhtkrWnn8e3tgiW3u8xDIWxHlAMbyYHxgYExjuT2FGu1/GRsCJXcO+ci1Y FwzP9Agc+fSkuLSdjVPvAzYIYf9JETqYvFw2dauR9ydL38vL3WhZvCYv5kWoHwTkpoHg U0Ky7DxvavVQkTchLxrxD4gnCcT7oHCo1VWVY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=eQjhE6wUB0var3oS0hWMr/liRSpVPSE3tfqXfu3VAKgminVWnP9fvSJpVl2PKd+dI6 6HZRLwDbQzPJY5PwB+1s4POIY0mxyvxoLh2aDAxuKopRBCjFxWOtBtVaj+zihOkAf6ba 3Ge56PEwwEC4sHvJbKTCtz501OEuaUScAZef8= Received: by 10.224.63.199 with SMTP id c7mr5672132qai.146.1299679845510; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.167.202.101] (h-64-236-128-41.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e29sm1421277qck.39.2011.03.09.06.10.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:10:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:10:43 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Cos. apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Ian, >=20 > Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late > 2009, I believe. I had asked INFRA folks on a few occasions about > adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything > back. >=20 > I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen = eventually. > -- > Thanks in advance, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >> I just discovered this Apache site, >> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it = looks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>=20 >> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put = the hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>=20 >> Regards >> Ian >> -- >> Ian Holsman >> Ian@Holsman.net >> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>=20 >> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3162-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 16:07:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88702 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 16:07:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 16:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13185 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 16:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13129 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 16:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13121 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 16:07:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:07:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:07:05 +0000 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so413634ywo.35 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:06:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.75.133 with SMTP id z5mr63846yhd.310.1299686803298; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:06:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.236.110.1 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:06:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> References: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:06:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sha7Mp0jAud6zdxQ7zVFmSwcd9E Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ian. yes, Sonar needs to have a pom'ed project. In case of an ant build such a pom can be created to 'wrap' around build.xml and is usually quite simple to manufacture. I have done it in the past for some HDFS experiments without much of a hassle. Here's the example: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Analyse+with+Maven in "Analyze projects which are not built with Maven" section. There's one more caveat though: handling of unit tests reports. It can be done with some new features Sonar has. See here: http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/ant/ I can quickly provide a working fixture to add say HDFS into Sonar as a starter. Pl. let me know where it needs to be put (perhaps a JIRA with a patch would do to?). Thanks for looking into this, Cos On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 06:10, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi Cos. > apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. > I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. > > On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Ian, >> >> Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late >> 2009, I believe. =A0I had asked =A0INFRA folks on a few occasions about >> adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything >> back. >> >> I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen eventu= ally. >> -- >> =A0 Thanks in advance, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> I just discovered this Apache site, >>> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it loo= ks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>> >>> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put the= hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ian >>> -- >>> Ian Holsman >>> Ian@Holsman.net >>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>> >>> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>> >>> >>> >>> > > From general-return-3163-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 16:31:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46577 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 16:30:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 16:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 58922 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 16:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58855 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 16:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58847 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 16:30:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:30:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:30:53 +0000 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so428469ywo.35 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:30:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.184.4 with SMTP id r4mr91956yhm.160.1299688232140; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:30:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.236.110.1 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:30:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:30:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -ZVAT4Y_6g-6I46n0nrp7kL0JvQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have looked around Apache's Sonar server and it seems to be sufficient to just have a correct pom.xml in place. I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1741 Will attend to it shortly. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:06, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Hi Ian. > > yes, Sonar needs to have a pom'ed project. In case of an ant build > such a pom can be created to 'wrap' around build.xml and is usually > quite simple to manufacture. I have done it in the past for some HDFS > experiments without much of a hassle. > > Here's the example: > =A0http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Analyse+with+Maven > in "Analyze projects which are not built with Maven" section. > > There's one more caveat though: handling of unit tests reports. It can > be done with some new features Sonar has. See here: > =A0http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/ant/ > > I can quickly provide a working fixture to add say HDFS into Sonar as > a starter. Pl. let me know where it needs to be put (perhaps a JIRA > with a patch would do to?). > > Thanks for looking into this, > =A0Cos > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 06:10, Ian Holsman wrote: >> Hi Cos. >> apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. >> I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. >> >> On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> Ian, >>> >>> Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late >>> 2009, I believe. =A0I had asked =A0INFRA folks on a few occasions about >>> adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything >>> back. >>> >>> I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen event= ually. >>> -- >>> =A0 Thanks in advance, >>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>> I just discovered this Apache site, >>>> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it lo= oks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>>> >>>> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put th= e hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Ian >>>> -- >>>> Ian Holsman >>>> Ian@Holsman.net >>>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>>> >>>> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > From general-return-3164-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 17:07:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87714 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 17:07:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 17:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 73001 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 17:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72953 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 17:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72945 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 17:07:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:07:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:06:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 26909 invoked by uid 507); 9 Mar 2011 17:06:31 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.651023 secs); 09 Mar 2011 17:06:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 17:06:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B451808C3; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:07:59 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgZX98JslhPF; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:07:59 -0500 (CST) Received: from [10.36.18.44] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.44]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F291808A5; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:07:59 -0500 (CST) Message-ID: <4D77B3DF.1040800@uci.cu> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:07:43 -0500 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Steve Loughran Subject: Re: Hadoop Development and the new Oracle's Plans References: <2052738279.11140861299085532253.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4D6F70B5.3020302@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > The other issue is that a lot of people out there use Mac laptops for > their development, and until java7 ships for the mac, nobody who has a > mac will be able to develop any Java 7 code. That's another reason for > Hadoop staying on Java6 > > What could be interesting would be for Hadoop to have more scala > integration. I think there are some good arguments for us moving some > of the high level code to that language, within the JVM, rather than > follow the oracle roadmap. Regards, Steve and all the list. I'm very interested on the Scala integration for the high level code of Hadoop. Is there any discussion about it? Any JIRA issue? Ideas? I would like to work on this, so I will keep on mind this topic. Thanks -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas Linux User # 418229 http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3165-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 00:10:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50581 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 00:10:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 00:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 52688 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52647 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52639 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:10:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.11 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.11] (HELO col0-omc1-s1.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:10:15 +0000 Received: from COL117-W56 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s1.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:09:54 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f7a1d1a5-f63b-4058-b525-c9d2a0039480_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: Running m/r jobs from within Eclipse and NetBeans on Windows? Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:09:55 -0600 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2011 00:09:54.0536 (UTC) FILETIME=[7BAABE80:01CBDEB7] --_f7a1d1a5-f63b-4058-b525-c9d2a0039480_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just got this from a developer using Eclipse=20 " 11/03/09 12:20:14 INFO zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Socket connection established to 10.8.120.61:2181=2C = initiating session 11/03/09 12:20:14 INFO zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Session establishment complete on server 10.8.120.61:= 2181=2C sessionid =3D 0x22df2ab81010592=2C negotiated timeout =3D 40000 11/03/09 12:20:16 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker=2C sessionId=3D Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: Failed to set permissions of path: file:/tmp/hadoop-boo/mapred/staging/boo1251500722/.staging to 0700 " I had the same issue using NetBeans=2C but I couldn't find the solution and= I gave up... (Too many other things to worry about and work on...) The directory exists=2C the file exists and when looking at it through cygw= in=2C I can see that the file permissions are 0700. This appears to be the last step blocking us from being able to launch jobs= directly out of Eclipse or NetBeans. So I have to ask... what am I missing and if anyone else has seen this or c= ame up with a solution? Thx -Mike = --_f7a1d1a5-f63b-4058-b525-c9d2a0039480_-- From general-return-3166-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:59:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1094 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 70788 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:59:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70082 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69701 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:59:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:59:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:59:32 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4335648bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:59:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=zbXKOntp8w07lJ8PiF3VAoflr7EKUbqOAJ5fp1Jdo24=; b=gexlOjbxT6kgmjtLqvsnL5zIaJR14Rb7qMVXxsT8RuYDL35pQeOU2MCetta9NmnHMT zTmpfIkJzxFO1HzDZI3m6Xfk/faQtbmDX4gswjotlCVyF6BAaZxoQ++i+fYoF1j6lpt1 7dUh5lbLASawrNOrF+IZrE6HumrIH0v8044UY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=FlfKfBaYmGJrU7YfT8iM5ftI3Nb1ewqxprBHCtK82NRk6p9GVv7MwzX5NUJKTc6eDH yGF6wV6gApdIbWGhu83EzeoMOx/vdJIxB+IvuFgOXV8wB/FcMHPvsUsb78Df0qRtunTW SfH+NLE1ppbr9cg6s+TJf8JZmutGcBwPrZYwU= Received: by 10.204.16.140 with SMTP id o12mr212506bka.125.1299880752075; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:59:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.1 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:58:52 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:58:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: SF Hadoop Meetup - March review and April announcement (April 13) To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a16e7a56da049e3c12b3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555a16e7a56da049e3c12b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, This week we had a great SF Hadoop meetup hosted by Yelp. As usual, we used an unconference format to construct agenda topics, and broke out into separate discussion groups. About 75 people attended, and we had a dozen great discussions; some were business-focused, others very technical, and some highly theoretical: * Learning thrift * Cluster capacity planning * Selling Hadoop to your organization * Alternate JVM languages and Hadoop * Schema / metadata management * Integration and Migration: Data warehousing, BI, and Hadoop * Abstract game theory problems and massive data sets * Hadoop monitoring / management best practices * "Oinkers anonymous"; for Pig users * Yahoo S4 and Cloudera Flume * Configuration tuning and performance * Production-level workflow tools Notes for some topics will be available at our meetup site at http://meetup.com/hadoopsf If you haven't yet come to one of our meetups, please consider trying it out next month! We need your voice to help contribute to the discussions. All members of the Hadoop community, novice or experienced, are welcome. Next month's meetup will be held Wednesday, April 13, from 6pm to 8pm. The meetup will be hosted by our friends at Twitter. Their office is at 795 Folsom St. (4th and Folsom) We will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. Please RSVP at http://bit.ly/gkIvqH Event schedule: * 6pm - Welcome * 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda * Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready * 8pm - Conclusion Regards, - Aaron Kimball --00032555a16e7a56da049e3c12b3-- From general-return-3167-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 03:02:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90581 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 03:02:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 03:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 43871 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 03:02:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43788 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 03:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43773 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 03:02:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:02:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Ken_Walker@ca.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.142] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:02:24 +0000 Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.85]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2C2hYGk000353 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:43:34 -0500 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273C6E8036 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:02:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p2C3229F226960 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:02:02 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p2C3229R018734 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:02:02 -0500 Received: from d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.105]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p2C3228R018722 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:02:02 -0500 Subject: AUTO: Ken Walker is on vacation (returning 2011/03/22) Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Ken Walker To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:02:00 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 03/11/2011 22:02:01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=0ABBF2C2DF832F7B8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF2C2DF832F7B" Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER --0__=0ABBF2C2DF832F7B8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF2C2DF832F7B Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I am out of the office until 2011/03/22. I am travelling on vacation and do not have access to email. I will ch= eck and respond to emails upon my return. Note: This is an automated response to your message "SF Hadoop Meetup = - March review and April announcement (April 13)" sent on 3/11/11 16:58:5= 2. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is awa= y.= --0__=0ABBF2C2DF832F7B8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF2C2DF832F7B-- From general-return-3168-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 19:00:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14022 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 19:00:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 61994 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61918 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61910 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:00:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:00:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 25111 invoked by uid 507); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:06 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.629389 secs); 12 Mar 2011 19:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 19:00:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20924132450F; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:00:05 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5pmGF5I8KuZ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0500 (CST) Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu (ucimail4.uci.cu [10.0.0.185]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8151324371; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0500 (CST) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0500 (CST) From: Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: akimball83@gmail.com Message-ID: <514379149.69241299956400283.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> In-Reply-To: <1346003106.68851299956284464.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> Subject: Re: SF Hadoop Meetup - March review and April announcement (April 13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.0.0.186] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regards, Aaron for this excellent meetup. There are many topics very interesting on this meetup. Are available all talks slides? Thanks a lot, =20 ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Aaron Kimball" Para: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Enviados: Viernes, 11 de Marzo 2011 16:58:52 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected Asunto: SF Hadoop Meetup - March review and April announcement (April 13) Hadoop fans, This week we had a great SF Hadoop meetup hosted by Yelp. As usual, we used an unconference format to construct agenda topics, and broke out into separate discussion groups. About 75 people attended, and we had a dozen great discussions; some were business-focused, others very technical, and some highly theoretical: * Learning thrift * Cluster capacity planning * Selling Hadoop to your organization * Alternate JVM languages and Hadoop * Schema / metadata management * Integration and Migration: Data warehousing, BI, and Hadoop * Abstract game theory problems and massive data sets * Hadoop monitoring / management best practices * "Oinkers anonymous"; for Pig users * Yahoo S4 and Cloudera Flume * Configuration tuning and performance * Production-level workflow tools Notes for some topics will be available at our meetup site at http://meetup.com/hadoopsf If you haven't yet come to one of our meetups, please consider trying it ou= t next month! We need your voice to help contribute to the discussions. All members of the Hadoop community, novice or experienced, are welcome. Next month's meetup will be held Wednesday, April 13, from 6pm to 8pm. The meetup will be hosted by our friends at Twitter. Their office is at 795 Folsom St. (4th and Folsom) We will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of severa= l discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. Please RSVP at http://bit.ly/gkIvqH Event schedule: * 6pm - Welcome * 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda * Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready * 8pm - Conclusion Regards, - Aaron Kimball --=20 Marcos Lu=C3=ADs Ort=C3=ADz Valmaseda Software Engineer=20 Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=C3=A1ticas Linux User # 418229 http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3169-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 21:37:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26729 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 21:37:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 21:37:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 42161 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 21:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42083 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 21:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42075 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 21:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:37:37 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so5088957bwz.35 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:37:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YeWqg1gE1qvQPWlHb20/c/2GbI8YkGIrggjKFXoEBjc=; b=FJLic/0AxNMMPvmrUTKwBCGmWqTKx+QrFD9Yxkhr+7epp455ao4h9jmfizTm/YtAUc k2qYomMVg7vGoGCga5e4Sk0sakr1SkZvOYousDmvONX98o6aOZqdesSoJ0ewkbP47a6a M2qHjDF6wjrzRZDiRmMaqopYRIzWQjUN91j+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=jKd9UG/umJdSnWY8GAy74JyQKuAZx5zwxlqEJhhvTKOmR4MhvDFsUlV0lJGAzra5Og rDniaqKaBUvABOAoYXnat9dK8kRbp1EgM8bnqissxoPer9c2UPvlKZLf3QdeyMVqOJ9S V6sETfE2Sm5VFppFpe4oOJGRqrWWGb7tJtM5s= Received: by 10.204.189.76 with SMTP id dd12mr1294898bkb.206.1299965836113; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:37:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.1 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:36:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <514379149.69241299956400283.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> References: <1346003106.68851299956284464.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> <514379149.69241299956400283.JavaMail.root@ucimail4.uci.cu> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:36:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SF Hadoop Meetup - March review and April announcement (April 13) To: Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334581e1b5f7049e4fe170 --20cf30334581e1b5f7049e4fe170 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marcos, There were no slides used at this meetup; the topics listed below were used to seed round-table discussions between the attendees. Some notes from various discussions have been transcribed and put on the meetup group's message board: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/messages/boards/ - Aaron On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wr= ote: > Regards, Aaron for this excellent meetup. > There are many topics very interesting on this meetup. > Are available all talks slides? > > Thanks a lot, > ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: "Aaron Kimball" > Para: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org > Enviados: Viernes, 11 de Marzo 2011 16:58:52 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected > Asunto: SF Hadoop Meetup - March review and April announcement (April 13) > > Hadoop fans, > > This week we had a great SF Hadoop meetup hosted by Yelp. As usual, we us= ed > an unconference format to construct agenda topics, and broke out into > separate discussion groups. About 75 people attended, and we had a dozen > great discussions; some were business-focused, others very technical, and > some highly theoretical: > > * Learning thrift > * Cluster capacity planning > * Selling Hadoop to your organization > * Alternate JVM languages and Hadoop > * Schema / metadata management > * Integration and Migration: Data warehousing, BI, and Hadoop > * Abstract game theory problems and massive data sets > * Hadoop monitoring / management best practices > * "Oinkers anonymous"; for Pig users > * Yahoo S4 and Cloudera Flume > * Configuration tuning and performance > * Production-level workflow tools > > Notes for some topics will be available at our meetup site at > http://meetup.com/hadoopsf > > If you haven't yet come to one of our meetups, please consider trying it > out > next month! We need your voice to help contribute to the discussions. All > members of the Hadoop community, novice or experienced, are welcome. > > Next month's meetup will be held Wednesday, April 13, from 6pm to 8pm. Th= e > meetup will be hosted by our friends at Twitter. Their office is at 795 > Folsom St. (4th and Folsom) > > We will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning = of > the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of > several > discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and > volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are > encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. > > Please RSVP at http://bit.ly/gkIvqH > > Event schedule: > * 6pm - Welcome > * 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda > * Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready > * 8pm - Conclusion > > Regards, > - Aaron Kimball > > -- > Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer > Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas > Linux User # 418229 > > http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 > > --20cf30334581e1b5f7049e4fe170-- From general-return-3170-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 17:49:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10719 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 17:49:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 17:49:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 146 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 17:49:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99522 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 17:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99338 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 17:49:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:49:16 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so5886625wyb.35 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:48:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cvGqQxIBeZZcvkFdsR/gx+ZxVd4ZYjqXF6R829Hibds=; b=k/XLrnguAbEvSUR8CyDNgmi7LL+A45J8LPLaIjhGbcRS0sgE6HAY0iES4u2+RlvLfM /dlAEBbsVgmQLApTlzE0unGiGXSJGdKfcpDJfznkMnZlDJbVEfQKEAj++EGrNlBMhLr7 q+qfrbj1wmEayC7mYSwL1JeHydQSMhr+WLc0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AwyP7nPBRhWt8YrKeic+JOZnTi8z62cwAo7G5rA2f3A2tjDhWoP3T/yvsYIFBh/OqX x/zhHvyNlIy9TuabLNiDG2IMkXUSdX2Q7aGw8T+GFv3nFB52HQPu8a0xQG8ymh3nkF4L o3b99JDRcaQk11Dx+knPKiGi0ki5vDnAMwd1Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.239.200 with SMTP id c50mr5881861wer.8.1300124931661; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.201 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:48:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: problem to write on HDFS From: Alessandro Binhara To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e385666b71e9b049e74eccc --e0cb4e385666b71e9b049e74eccc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello ... I have a servlet on tomcat.. and it open a hdfs and write simple file with a content of post information. Well , in first test we had a 14.000 request per second. My servet start many trads to write on filesystem. i got this message on tomcat: Mar 11, 2011 6:00:20 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Acceptor run SEVERE: Socket accept failed java.net.SocketException: Too many open files HDFS is slow to write a file? How is a better strategy to write on HFDS... In real aplication we will have a 100.000 request per second to salve in hdfs. thanks.. --e0cb4e385666b71e9b049e74eccc-- From general-return-3171-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 18:16:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76002 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 18:16:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 18:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 63722 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:16:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63647 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63626 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 18:16:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:16:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:16:31 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6721779bwz.35 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:16:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=32/3hY4vJu60OxbjyOyl7xW2thIqfRc5codLZm35A/A=; b=MVsOyj2KRyebo0oahP9PKE/x4zVQ5F/y1h9uICXnHiF4REnRoaLv0UVlq0luWkNj84 eoaI9ajeX2tx6dpMfEpZx1hxjqQao5ajXLbbIsysB3PgPZizTuwS/Ubmu183TTVa+FQ8 YSjsdEyPE7IGyIfAv5jUlRS1qskQ2eFOsgjJM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Y8+pkrblcdcYESSphoTv6DXO0HPqSp8KHq8GrihK13exZn3vpyQQuNwVWPv0pJe39i 3OrC9rquz0ueQ6uGE14dY4lyun1VdMAI/gw1eS84V9Clg0MJA6F4lm4yhhTSBzQovNb0 4fah/ff4nXaiqESEY1AAi7i0xQygJr1WiEeJA= Received: by 10.204.16.140 with SMTP id o12mr2830531bka.125.1300126547140; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:15:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.1 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:15:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:15:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem to write on HDFS To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Alessandro Binhara , hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a16e017328049e754d03 --00032555a16e017328049e754d03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Alessandro, I think your requirements are outside the operating envelope for HDFS' design. HDFS is not particularly well-suited for interactive operation -- it's designed for batch workloads like those performed by MapReduce. Opening, writing, and closing 100,000 files/second is unlikely to work on HDFS. When users head to your site, why do they need to write files in HDFS? What do those files represent? If each servlet is just trying to log its operations to HDFS, then you should use a system like Flume which will aggregate the log records together into a smaller number of streams and then write those to a more reasonable number of files which are kept open for a longer amount of time. If instead each servlet is saving some sort of per-user state that you expect to retrieve in an online fashion, you should look at HBase or another distributed (key, value) store (there are several options), which will enable faster retrieval of this information. Good luck, - Aaron On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > Hello ... > > I have a servlet on tomcat.. and it open a hdfs and write simple file with > a > content of post information. > Well , in first test we had a 14.000 request per second. > My servet start many trads to write on filesystem. > > i got this message on tomcat: > > Mar 11, 2011 6:00:20 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Acceptor run > SEVERE: Socket accept failed > java.net.SocketException: Too many open files > > > HDFS is slow to write a file? > How is a better strategy to write on HFDS... > > In real aplication we will have a 100.000 request per second to salve in > hdfs. > > thanks.. > --00032555a16e017328049e754d03-- From general-return-3172-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 21:10:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64063 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 21:10:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 21:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 83792 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 21:10:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83747 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 21:10:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83739 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 21:10:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:10:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.242] (HELO nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:10:15 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.188] by nm26.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 21:09:53 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.178] by tm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 21:09:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 21:09:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 775481.809.bm@omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78122 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2011 21:09:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1300136993; bh=YmljpKEi+NpgAih0nbuDTi01+FTUWFKYjwhwZLD0STE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cqmahPERZtyQsMCGlxxQlW3cymZZBttSH5S1+R9LDIa5m/CwjIOorjLxcQitIFs0WxOsAYVSwNTY4P66s9OiXOkNW+OO7X8tyVJxGs9UmZS9Yk1Ss27AWr/xAnySh6oDdoknp9eqqTCFPQLXNNKQltHc1qiHYrM3HW+FJ4Bp1A8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Eq0sygschytWJLTZj0IDkQmL82kIa60JmyUyMVd7DsWQdHUep23KOnhJgQTYTJnzr7rX/iucldOj/QLASK8ZVcmg6+9QIp0Tfu2Ri4xZWgnKHQfjlEIK/me/gTd1rVk62/8hy7bQH6Mep1VwiAHXxE7W8kObCFBjaFinDwmbrBg=; Message-ID: <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 6cvmwygVM1n_KECoQ8K.slAs8.XhOe68QPu0IEcxCqLy5.V U7SdJvYAeiCb50Jiq90ecs6Qf7EcFyHGkE6QqtjgI0hru2jiHt.WGeze4H.y lJlLUagsULpYLB6DsPplgcbCrPSGmcT_7NwYjGuSoT7sPqx6AKc9ibvgAWXo 7S58YP8MbYVL8WjCqA7aGr7zX4SBiQlT.u1kZnlqsC7FVXiocdhkATvG6rcl roYVniVzMReS9P3gYQ4PCKFJK5iAB9Zlifnq2dMcVto4K9D79u48HZif23sv 20.d8B6280uEDlyyLY4Ut4g0iCTdEMdd9Ye.AkqWAW07ZioWhYtSP5uyi6dj skL8gepma7Wos9G_ENS6USg0paLCb7lY5.ZENpBLiWTQXjRFDmMo44YxS2QH PhdOOQVgFqFbp99nHbvu7G.4ZYZhGeoBG Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:09:53 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:09:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-865380475-1300136993=:77045" --0-865380475-1300136993=:77045 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Ian, Could you add me to the hudson-jobadmin group? It seems that Hudson sometimes does not run automatically. Nicholas Sze ________________________________ From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 5:12:57 PM Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing I believe ommitters can gain access following this: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. Nige --0-865380475-1300136993=:77045-- From general-return-3173-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:11:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60682 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:11:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:11:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74046 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:11:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73988 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:11:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73980 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:11:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:11:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:11:35 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2065081qyk.14 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:11:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=nb+Uk+EKPIjxt2XQLoPRROAy2YZfVrhbgOUa4//+6qY=; b=Uym1q6rcP8KxQMoiAubikhdpwnIBRPSaA3OaVtVPts0/nDnOgP4p8urrHDaJSE4fUd ajBGbR4k6W2oX/iJTR4qV4eEDwQX+NJkrJq6nYLgAMBiok7tYYp4EvIxWHMgteuYpp8e w59x8+wOw5ndjh0LuhlKGyDXkMlEigW1PRj2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=GpHs4SdNfFM6Rs+PQTFHVBmnB363+j0ozwC5LeJFvImgvrk+04i1JlPHSSfKOfVFSZ /N3c2FiCPCwT85wMHL1R0buBFz0F7hQqtEBVCmtYpnsu4k8Mjy5dyCy0i7DZP9MKSI1g Q9mqwKfQ/uB1HEf2BAQzSm5sGxWBjCTDVv1Dc= Received: by 10.229.51.142 with SMTP id d14mr10412571qcg.47.1300140673794; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.122] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm4667708qco.13.2011.03.14.15.11.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:11:07 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2AFA74C9-8D5C-4F30-B776-CD75450113A2@Holsman.NET> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org done. give it a shot and let me know how it goes. On Mar 15, 2011, at 8:09 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi Ian, >=20 > Could you add me to the hudson-jobadmin group? It seems that Hudson = sometimes=20 > does not run automatically. >=20 > Nicholas Sze >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 5:12:57 PM > Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing >=20 > I believe ommitters can gain access following this: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account > Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >=20 > Nige From general-return-3174-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:14:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61665 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 81501 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81445 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81437 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.213] (HELO nm16.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:14:33 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.191] by nm16.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 22:14:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.147] by tm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 22:14:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2011 22:14:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 367370.98200.bm@omp1030.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 73881 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2011 22:14:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1300140852; bh=NUL/G8owVOzZCffUzPabaj5a8Jk5NPGG37f2+ayAIzA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5lqJmEa+4iVBXINCMXVsEnAS7Av1wUOy6NrQIKxOpPNezOc/1hyup19VwuY8gFRD3lkjCuEJo9nRdgykbBEfBy56JbIe65Jp3NhHjA4x3eKirLvVJ9C8tAHtlJDR0dHNW9LfxcFM42oGXWbTJMacIG9VwP6xWd/dkfp6HEcEe5M= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TkbNBZ7SWrQmORQI9A7v6eosS9EEoV0+Cxe3i5eyfFTpswQhIfvUMYV+7KOx6d0YSP97o5Kko/8GUjD4eFRITR5tVax32lT+W3Qn2IugjAGSU6VNceN+C3KwkyuEcAr69VJvyNDek179MKCq53akp0NrVLb2ZuWwPbxI+BW8GMA=; Message-ID: <229091.73636.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: OsnZOskVM1nVH8sX7puc7KWlH1PwXRogtH8JcJ5gN4C27g0 7_qGQCTJEYELIYkbBz7sNK2VKWAzyRToni4sWME1E4CvpTIpq5BbZ8pbFXSw QPBAbqKOb1rvrtyWUv.IVCRpP.33Db10bY5Qow_kCRkWsgNHR_cV1sbBSNjn PFPH7TgTio2hZhQyctqj7NWBI1C87ELS.inq7BYX3AjUUFvBkDcehskowkl5 xKaQ8WgLFP_JAprTH1tF4KOmhlQjSVBpUVwsPFotPhOSjv6gI72SH06TL954 T1IhmykNKiiYzhCy96IfGpNaTG47Rw5J8Ym3Dqq3GBzuB4ji2TAnq8zjqPwM lhm_UP1QZo4mDM4wvAt_th5D6Wpad7GIgtlII_1UECTaOnCO4.LxK7Q-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:11 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <2AFA74C9-8D5C-4F30-B776-CD75450113A2@Holsman.NET> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <2AFA74C9-8D5C-4F30-B776-CD75450113A2@Holsman.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1973338577-1300140851=:73636" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1973338577-1300140851=:73636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Ian, Thanks for the fast response! It works. I just have started a build. Nicholas ________________________________ From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 3:11:07 PM Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing done. give it a shot and let me know how it goes. On Mar 15, 2011, at 8:09 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Could you add me to the hudson-jobadmin group? It seems that Hudson sometimes > > does not run automatically. > > Nicholas Sze > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 5:12:57 PM > Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing > > I believe ommitters can gain access following this: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account > Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. > > Nige --0-1973338577-1300140851=:73636-- From general-return-3175-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 05:03:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74963 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 05:03:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 05:03:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 59656 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 05:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59464 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 05:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59451 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 05:03:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:03:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:03:13 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.5] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LI300C3M20RBZ20@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:02:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-03-14_05:2011-03-14,2011-03-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1103140223 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> From: Nigel Daley X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8F190) In-reply-to: <675580.77045.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-id: <54E2AC29-E45F-458F-951B-D1F39B1B4DBC@mac.com> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:02:48 -0700 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Nicholas, what do u mean it doesn't always start automatically? Cheers, Nige Sent from my iPhone4 On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:09 PM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Could you add me to the hudson-jobadmin group? It seems that Hudson sometimes > does not run automatically. > > Nicholas Sze > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 5:12:57 PM > Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing > > I believe ommitters can gain access following this: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account > Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. > > Nige From general-return-3176-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 09:56:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16941 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 09:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 09:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 56053 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 09:55:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55975 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 09:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55967 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 09:55:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:55:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:55:48 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so455157fxm.35 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:55:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fy8nppy4AZTYWbHd78BI406RyEepWUJ0cyMbazycqR4=; b=Fo/YBRLfTm92yxIUU14q3CmMBeHDydSYcnBYuVbOmDudZG6EFIO4Rsp7j+d9KCxu5b iNs3UPNW1iABpr4BGOIn3s6O0wgduRJaYERHG16i5xhYnupscCMCStlJQi9bQ9z1h7Px jw19vnHR3rOOCED3G7G54tgXeXFQXmkS3wigU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VvPUtjfw3PxgHnyJWwQ7pbsQqY6GIe8PU9fYk97t55YO19wHWG58RHD8ZPNFtB4u03 CLtfUyTeuiZOh65cFHbvTIj+LDL0wV1nvH3pvRe/paY4GHhG39HrMdM6cvBxIsjhHZWk SItimY/6/Tw/ne2UXs7ZLFIvQ42/6eiDr/LFw= Received: by 10.223.160.80 with SMTP id m16mr1375045fax.72.1300182928319; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.19.4.124] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f15sm3381029fax.34.2011.03.15.02.55.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D7F378E.30402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:55:26 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I'm having this problem running mapreduce jobs over about 10TB of data (smaller jobs are ok): 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Job initialization failed: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000. Aborting job job_201103141436_0058 at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.split.SplitMetaInfoReader.readSplitMetaInfo(SplitMetaInfoReader.java:48) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.createSplits(JobInProgress.java:732) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:633) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.initJob(JobTracker.java:3965) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:79) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Failing job job_201103141436_0058 What settings should I change to run this job? I'm using CDH3b3. Thanks for all answers. -- Wojciech Langiewcz From general-return-3177-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 10:33:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42354 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 10:33:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 10:33:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 91985 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 10:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91931 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 10:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91922 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 10:33:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:33:35 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so485747fxm.35 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:33:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Eopyq5LACkbhk3f0VEEIs+zfoevZb5PmSeAW9uYGYvE=; b=Uo55mpEUIcueDWmm4Zw/M42UHKpLsAb5ycgkseFWielnNiI5bDKz7ZB0/4iIjFGpCR 2JBE9yOAQjorQkBwjUBNi7e2IJAx4HKYWeKOY6a3dboco8E1yP01NXliT56/vgcuM4eW MBApH7ZhxZf4IyIly/ug5yf0TsTesW3bG2L2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=bcc:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jM827pAJnqHt0S9ibAsoTuNlPWQDsed+UhD7J9nHfDmDQOV60uheYSZArqEyYlS/H9 3quhbPcay0ghW4Ze3heatJFOcEmaJwPhtic9NSeyR/gOQMLICYmdwBin2YEKIX1LYT6V 0JhWF0VgzJb6DqRYpxZzdZl05jCRpZZXg62dg= Received: by 10.223.127.14 with SMTP id e14mr2480258fas.97.1300185194166; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:33:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.123.139 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:32:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D7F378E.30402@gmail.com> References: <4D7F378E.30402@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:02:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000 To: CDH Users Cc: wlangiewicz@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Moving this discussion to the CDH users list at cdh-user [at] cloudera.org since it could be a CDH specific issue. [Bcc: general] On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Hello, > I'm having this problem running mapreduce jobs over about 10TB of data > (smaller jobs are ok): > 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Job > initialization failed: > java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000. Aborting job > job_201103141436_0058 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.split.SplitMetaInfoReader.readSplitMetaInfo(S= plitMetaInfoReader.java:48) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.createSplits(JobInProgress.java:73= 2) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:633) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.initJob(JobTracker.= java:3965) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(Eage= rTaskInitializationListener.java:79) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor= .java:886) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.jav= a:908) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Failing > job job_201103141436_0058 > > What settings should I change to run this job? > I'm using CDH3b3. > Thanks for all answers. > > -- > Wojciech Langiewcz > --=20 Harsh J http://harshj.com From general-return-3178-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 14:20:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72176 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 14:20:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 14:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4035 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 14:20:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3958 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 14:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3950 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 14:20:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:20:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D531BA799 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gWmC965brMCY for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622E11BA787 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:26 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1300803554.4064@4KSnyYfCnIksmA8vznGbdg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p2FEJDTs007571 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:14 GMT Message-ID: <4D7F7561.30709@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:19:13 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: problem to write on HDFS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p2FEJDTs007571 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 14/03/11 17:48, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > Hello ... > > I have a servlet on tomcat.. and it open a hdfs and write simple file with a > content of post information. > Well , in first test we had a 14.000 request per second. > My servet start many trads to write on filesystem. > > i got this message on tomcat: > > Mar 11, 2011 6:00:20 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Acceptor run > SEVERE: Socket accept failed > java.net.SocketException: Too many open files > > > HDFS is slow to write a file? > How is a better strategy to write on HFDS... > > In real aplication we will have a 100.000 request per second to salve in > hdfs. > > thanks.. > Aaron is right, your expectations of Hadoop HDFS are probably wrong, but you haven't got that far yet, you are running out of socket handles, which is because you need to increase your ulimits so that more sockets can be open. Search for the error string you've seen and you'll find details on the problem and various solutions -a problem that has nothing to do with Hadoop at all. From general-return-3179-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 19:02:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51838 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 19:02:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 19:02:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 52606 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 19:02:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52545 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 19:02:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52537 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 19:02:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:02:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jrottinghuis@ebay.com) Received: from [216.33.244.7] (HELO rhv-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com) (216.33.244.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:01:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:CC: Date:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=pSgxhKuWmBvzHbIJm50Sbnqu5ynwg/mIMWjhDKpA7Ruul28n1pET0WXz t3NDnORd1eefpSreAzXc+ZXjy3S/pD9PHW95JeRQ/zU9o7ohChQyAAW+8 aSsigtNPACRyBw+; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=jrottinghuis@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1300388518; x=1331924518; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fa0ZVHjma0bjdtITRgVsILGCbvTGlJDxbfEvHUUt/jI=; b=16oOZz3cfC0eNPucn54tsE2HfkLM4xwOSYQAvSPXNEUhoRrfsKQXFgZf hGeE8FgwWEcxFbkRP2pYVJXx1SX3FuHwUruJSQyyREe1V83xxUpDt4GEM Z726JTaQBO3pvAZ; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,200,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="11431482" Received: from rhv-vtenf-002.corp.ebay.com (HELO RHV-MEXHT-002.corp.ebay.com) ([10.112.113.53]) by rhv-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2011 12:01:36 -0700 Received: from RHV-MEXMS-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.17.114]) by RHV-MEXHT-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.24.101]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:01:36 -0700 From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , CDH Users CC: "wlangiewicz@gmail.com" Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:01:34 -0700 Subject: RE: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000 Thread-Topic: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000 Thread-Index: Acvi/HgegM3CCCS3TXyDOASoYHwwSwBzYtww Message-ID: References: <4D7F378E.30402@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== x-ems-stamp: AltoNIPk0e6ZbVQynXM4kA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter: Scanned Doubt this is a CDH3 issue. We saw the same with a large job using the 0.20-security branch. There is a property (mapreduce.jobtracker.split.metainfo.maxsize) that can = be used to override the default of 10^6. We found that passing this along with the job has no effect, this worked on= ly when setting this property on the jobtracker node. Not sure if this is a= feature or a bug. Cheers, Joep -----Original Message----- From: Harsh J [mailto:qwertymaniac@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:33 AM To: CDH Users Cc: wlangiewicz@gmail.com Subject: Re: java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000 Moving this discussion to the CDH users list at cdh-user [at] cloudera.org since it could be a CDH specific issue. [Bcc: general] On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Hello, > I'm having this problem running mapreduce jobs over about 10TB of data > (smaller jobs are ok): > 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Job > initialization failed: > java.io.IOException: Split metadata size exceeded 10000000. Aborting job > job_201103141436_0058 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.split.SplitMetaInfoReader.readSplitMetaInfo(S= plitMetaInfoReader.java:48) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.createSplits(JobInProgress.java:73= 2) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:633) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.initJob(JobTracker.= java:3965) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(Eage= rTaskInitializationListener.java:79) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor= .java:886) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.jav= a:908) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > 2011-03-15 07:48:22,031 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Failing > job job_201103141436_0058 > > What settings should I change to run this job? > I'm using CDH3b3. > Thanks for all answers. > > -- > Wojciech Langiewcz > --=20 Harsh J http://harshj.com From general-return-3180-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 20:16:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84898 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 20:16:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 20:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 54082 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 20:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54038 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 20:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54030 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 20:16:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:16:06 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so3863308wyb.35 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:15:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lqHbJFoDziPUaFkZECwrcS7Xb6LuSZnnAxk7uL+w8oY=; b=CJY+lSC7POSTqMAkT35tM5+uku4pssiI7JS3ZC+JU0LH9HfEvEHQg9B3DFJuo2HHkp 6ZjeX5X2PlTMlZ4oWGhHdS+DiZdJFWuuGue/1A5e/LWkxvCO/6Xt8mMxUzPOVi42ttPW HCsQvtkPRSbtERgYDLyTp+AMAz8cXR1G+T5gA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k9sZKXQaAK8uhxc5+d+57dxj6zl2eOyoBnMfWLmESQr2Ygn0jhDVRdiUmvjALMpgnF CdLgo9rEM0+DEnOtDGutGQPu57NVI6PVrsLV4wSTVcDnWxldiEXQ3lBXk150uDpmKX4Q wnu8ye6HeDZ+sg6eBbVTL0HszrxmR8175thEM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.8 with SMTP id x8mr206128wee.46.1300392944451; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.21.82 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:15:44 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: How to pass a parameter to map ? From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db297885c030049eb353dd --0016e6db297885c030049eb353dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > I need select a data on map... I can pass paramenter to map when i configure a job? Other questions : I need sort a data and save in many files. the name of file is a sort Key ..??? thanks .. --0016e6db297885c030049eb353dd-- From general-return-3181-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 20:58:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21081 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 20:58:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 20:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 27662 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 20:58:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27479 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 20:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27471 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 20:58:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:58:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:58:11 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4025149fxm.35 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cPAjiOkw4kFX5vvRDcLxdG1q8xuvmSDndB94N579OFY=; b=eo6NJ2leMUV7voxsQZX3JqgOwb4/XvOEKNCmH26juICuECalWfpnw3XgG11ht+H2pC aIeSNgeWgHHN50+uKkGNStbYmpFTe0Ucu+kgEGIAJ4SCST8QrIHO4X4qcBsruS75EBm+ j6PbpxqjAwiHebQmmZ0i3vV9JBMvLPQOvPRP8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OVI6IRzDZhfNqaSkSH0deSYIeraOqLTJGVlU+bAQFt8P9lDiio4cjXqeDoMC3SF8PM UZtASbOmFCdAuUruczn3cGAxDqmJ6BZwDI9juUAdf0BMsc/+8ldOe4glfYHxnI0zqdhq VU80HPxHZZQfCP1ISGlnXpmsMUinEyHPsjbz8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.16.82 with SMTP id n18mr293001faa.48.1300395438948; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.83.196 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:57:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:57:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to pass a parameter to map ? From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747862e34c1ef049eb3e84a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151747862e34c1ef049eb3e84a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> I can pass paramenter to map when i configure a job? You can utilize hadoop Configuration (JobConf). On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > > > > > > > I need select a data on map... > I can pass paramenter to map when i configure a job? > > Other questions : > I need sort a data and save in many files. the name of file is a sort Key > ..??? > > thanks .. > --00151747862e34c1ef049eb3e84a-- From general-return-3182-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 21:37:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67362 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 21:37:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 21:37:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 92198 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 21:37:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92135 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 21:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92127 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 21:37:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:37:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:37:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 20315 invoked by uid 507); 17 Mar 2011 21:36:46 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.183 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.183):. Processed in 0.792996 secs); 17 Mar 2011 21:36:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (10.0.0.183) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 21:36:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307F6C481B1; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:16 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GHwFUW8MnEDy; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:15 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.44] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.44]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3999DC480A1; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:15 -0400 (CDT) Subject: Re: How to pass a parameter to map ? From: Marcos Ortiz To: Ted Yu Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:37:59 -0430 Message-ID: <1300399679.1308.28.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:57 -0700, Ted Yu wrote: > >> I can pass paramenter to map when i configure a job? > You can utilize hadoop Configuration (JobConf). > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I need select a data on map... > > I can pass paramenter to map when i configure a job? > > > > Other questions : > > I need sort a data and save in many files. the name of file is a sort Key > > ..??? > > > > thanks .. > > Take a deep look to JobConf object because there are many tuneable parameters divided by sections: - HDFS Writing - Job submission - Per-Job - Map task Sumission and Execution etc Regards -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From general-return-3183-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 19:45:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40112 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 19:45:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 19:45:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 76448 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:45:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76354 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32646 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 19:07:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of krjeschke@omniti.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:06:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Surge 2011 Conference CFP From: Katherine Jeschke To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364162a9133449049ec67b96 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364162a9133449049ec67b96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We are excited to announce Surge 2011, the Scalability and Performance Conference, to be held in Baltimore on Sept 28-30, 2011. The event focuses on case studies that demonstrate successes (and failures) in Web applications and Internet architectures. This year, we're adding Hack Day on September 28th. The inaugural, 2010 conference (http://omniti.com/surge/2010) was a smashing success and we are currently accepting submissions for papers through April 3rd. You can find more information about topics online: http://omniti.com/surge/2011 2010 attendees compared Surge to the early days of Velocity, and our speakers received 3.5-4 out of 4 stars for quality of presentation and quality of content! Nearly 90% of first-year attendees are planning to come again in 2011. For more information about the CFP or sponsorship of the event, please contact us at surge (AT) omniti (DOT) com. -- Katherine Jeschke Marketing Director OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. 7070 Samuel Morse Drive, Ste.150 Columbia, MD 21046 O: 410/872-4910, 222 C: 443/643-6140 omniti.com circonus.com --0016364162a9133449049ec67b96-- From general-return-3184-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 16:19:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56642 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 16:19:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 16:19:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 11092 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 16:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11001 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 16:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10978 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 16:19:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of samplise@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:19:33 +0000 Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so3845140yia.35 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WLC2u7LsYX9UOlEK7iZ2jm2BpsA9U/VvSmXtvCHT0rM=; b=M4u6U+H69soCNmdUiUelAgxjcnL4Xc7bQQRifP7XHd3zmB1yDMwytBKtcqN6MiOcV5 je9HtlL4Ebcp4aUVx1GHnfE3/CLlhGGBTKwZLWJI/shXrUD2TfkKflt5ijHzfDWidWXB ksvjPgdzZTlFmhJ7DwePTHd4B8eE+8h7qEzJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pPx3G+7aByVu7hJRlADUl+UHD1CsSEm5AdYBSVi2QXssnra4dgAi5+2h4mGD5xU7Nn YMqnmyP/slm95vkALoo7XMXBzAkiTSxTI5D4IM+nGe20ZO1fiYn/DMzar7PUSyCigicD O8Yrky/k3Oj5oXgJQDkihLz46g1WLx55RmFNk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.67.1 with SMTP id i1mr7093890yhd.341.1300810752326; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.19 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:19:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: How to insert some print codes into Hadoop? From: Bo Sang To: Hadoop General Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00248c710507d0014a049f149a8f --00248c710507d0014a049f149a8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, guys: I would like to do some minor modification of Hadoop (just to insert some print codes into particular places). And I have the following questions: 1. It seems there are three parts of Hadoop: common, hdfs, mapred. And they are packed as three independent jar packages. Could I only modify one part (eg, common) and pack a new jar package without modifying the rest two. 2. I have try to import the folder hadoop-0.21.0/common into eclipse as a project. But eclipse fails to recognize it as an existing project. But if I import folder hadoop-0.21.0 as a existing project, it works. However, I only want to modify common part. How could I only modify common part and export a new common jar package without modifying the rest two parts. -- Best Regards! Sincerely Bo Sang --00248c710507d0014a049f149a8f-- From general-return-3185-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 20:03:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12838 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 20:03:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 20:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69474 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:03:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69411 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69403 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 20:03:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:03:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=5.0 tests=DCC_CHECK,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chenqibj@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.145 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.145] (HELO e23smtp03.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:03:37 +0000 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.245]) by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2MJwRKE029226 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:58:27 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p2MK37qq2134220 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:03:07 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p2MK36tR002479 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:03:06 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p2MK36L2002475 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:03:06 +1100 Subject: Keith Chen is out of office for vacation Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Qi BJ Chen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:03:04 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 03/23/2011 04:03:04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBF2C8DFFDA2738f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2C8DFFDA273" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=C7BBF2C8DFFDA2738f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2C8DFFDA273 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2011-03-22 and will not return until 2011-03-31. --0__=C7BBF2C8DFFDA2738f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2C8DFFDA273-- From general-return-3186-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 08:13:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56797 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 08:13:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 08:13:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 61656 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 08:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61578 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 08:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61570 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 08:13:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zly928@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:13:06 +0000 Received: by vxi40 with SMTP id 40so8279100vxi.35 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:12:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D7XH9iRCs46a/7xNOG4AyZTp7UMb27GzgIZCwVbL8m0=; b=xKdq3pbGQSeFOVHlL74cHFPtshMsOV5vQf65buGwDR9gAvZKf/oHAnpl28e7Awmosn kHOea0+RwpFrmyGVssJDGx61ZUiDa3XnhYG/FHyExDEo/++qCQ8lLdK5PwTLjOR/oXwu BQBiOcn/WRSzSfJDP8KkCeAuP7lzgYSdTInyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V8pE/IXeUDBPgCwq/iQYOKoio7LTpE8QE2pXWD/aTgUL7n8JzIOm1U0TjRcfvXxLq/ OXEHk+PJ9ZUxQHrIs4w0y/NbDZz3orHk6W68Y4llWVxJMMw+k8/qoWlQ64nNMsFRTcvG 8F35IHHg9JoWZEaaPD5eXWyvLB9D7x+KHfhzw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.97 with SMTP id eh1mr4230184vdb.148.1300867965992; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.96.77 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:12:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:12:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Keith Chen is out of office for vacation From: =?GB2312?B?1tzB4dHF?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh! It's wonderful! And I hope your vacation happy! 2011/3/23, Qi BJ Chen : > > I will be out of the office starting 2011-03-22 and will not return unti= l > 2011-03-31. > --=20 =B4=D3=CE=D2=B5=C4=D2=C6=B6=AF=C9=E8=B1=B8=B7=A2=CB=CD From general-return-3190-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:13:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 888 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:13:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10479 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:45:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10433 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60283 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:12:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Subject: Re: google snappy From: Tim Wintle Reply-To: tim.wintle@teamrubber.com To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Weishung Chung In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Team Rubber Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:11:39 +0000 Message-ID: <1300900299.8811.3.camel@tim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.194.110.230 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tim.wintle@teamrubber.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on megamail.netsight.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 10:03 -0700, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Somebody obviously needs to publish some benchmarks, but knowing > Snappy's origin I can believe that claim. There were some benchmarks in the original Bigtable presentation Results from compressing bigtable blocks: Algorithm % remaining Encoding Decoding Gzip 13.4% 21MB/s 118MB/s LZO 20.5% 135MB/s 410MB/s Zippy 22.2% 172MB/s 409MB/s (Zippy is apparently what's now been renamed snappy) Tim Wintle From general-return-3191-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:14:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1064 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:13:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11905 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:45:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11842 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65089 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:20:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of weishung@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h1h9SVX+1ft8ZNNMWF/j+rglYfNubsviNW0t9HlG57g=; b=Hg45bQ29Vp05osqTCpp2DmNYm6RRK0/fKgQhNsHW3vwJSfELduECGCeHR/x2icshxU EBHR1yv5z5oFuzi/ynBkln7P3TEusFV8E97Bpk3bt8qe+1wWu3Z7KqBWN7qpwQihP/U9 c62EnzdV2m8I86vBGL/GFz3jAETDlAffpZciY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=d6PwrRT3BHQRA3eNlHWXpdGkLr9r2FpxDjCnztF/EIjnOb0ZluqLKhUlf2xsLx5KEi bgatfEE8X3DrSyOY5q+uOWQ/vej2c7kBRYdfZ3qikarJN1Crx+6EIYZRFAGrUJbgMsDZ ecJ+1ts12veFiEWTm8v/kINVyKOVep7T+xWE8= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1300900299.8811.3.camel@tim-laptop> References: <1300900299.8811.3.camel@tim-laptop> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:20:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: google snappy From: Weishung Chung To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, tim.wintle@teamrubber.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555947694a57d049f2a6a90 --00032555947694a57d049f2a6a90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Great to know that hadoop/hbase are integrating it :D On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tim Wintle wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 10:03 -0700, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > > Somebody obviously needs to publish some benchmarks, but knowing > > Snappy's origin I can believe that claim. > > There were some benchmarks in the original Bigtable presentation > > Results from compressing bigtable blocks: > > Algorithm % remaining Encoding Decoding > Gzip 13.4% 21MB/s 118MB/s > LZO 20.5% 135MB/s 410MB/s > Zippy 22.2% 172MB/s 409MB/s > > (Zippy is apparently what's now been renamed snappy) > > Tim Wintle > > --00032555947694a57d049f2a6a90-- From general-return-3188-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:31:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63138 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:31:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:31:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2776 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2728 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2720 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:41:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:41:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:41:35 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so11097973wwc.29 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.177.199 with SMTP id bj7mr297214wbb.140.1300902074121; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.227.133.135 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:40:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zRZtxH0MGjvf5DvtwXJ1nRHmcE8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to insert some print codes into Hadoop? To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Moving to common-user@, Bcc'ing general@] If you know where you need to have your print statements you can use AspectJ to do runtime injection of needed java code into desirable spots. You don't need to even touch the source code for that - just instrument (weave) the jar file -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:19, Bo Sang wrote: > Hi, guys: > > I would like to do some minor modification of Hadoop (just to insert some > print codes into particular places). And I have the following questions: > > 1. It seems there are three parts of Hadoop: common, hdfs, mapred. And th= ey > are packed as three independent jar packages. Could I only modify one par= t > (eg, common) and pack a new jar package without modifying the rest two. > > 2. I have try to import the folder hadoop-0.21.0/common into eclipse as a > project. But eclipse fails to recognize it as an existing project. But if= I > import folder hadoop-0.21.0 as a existing project, it works. However, I o= nly > want to modify common part. How could I only modify =A0common part and ex= port > a new common jar package without modifying the rest two parts. > > -- > Best Regards! > > Sincerely > Bo Sang > From general-return-3189-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:50:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52218 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:50:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:50:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 29163 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:00:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29109 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29099 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:00:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:00:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of samplise@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:00:42 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so4603280gwj.35 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c6LILXuUknXOZ8tx4FDRNVdVo5O/pYo1QLwHEL+Q+LQ=; b=ttlU1zzhvMrWp9jiK4awpwoDFFrGSeRFKgw6snk2pK/vVnR0Wy2t8FrTSgZbyykqy0 HQttmoURJPuxLCZMryw/HRUCLAiQHKclSfbtMcLCMpv/9VXunNyppmkSjRwG5x0UdGK1 mGLx8p4g/dOz05e5vhCBtXRjsZl3rWul9WH3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YuK+Wwfcky4/ATaBdpbeKhm7nw+t/Npr9nzjOdz2yWzEJi4aoXhGFYPnxqnU3Tl6nX OzvSXn4SvATKG4pf095cfQEO9ha2PooOZjN+NopCXaG0j1n3eyIQmwiycVUHuISyIeiB 3NCB6awqNHF/0T0XutNDB3M4R5vTki1MQcx30= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.154.97 with SMTP id g61mr7258919yhk.91.1300903221331; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:00:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to insert some print codes into Hadoop? From: Bo Sang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303dd75865083b049f2a22c1 --20cf303dd75865083b049f2a22c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks very much for your reply. But if I would like to modify Hadoop source code, how could I achieve this goal? On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > [Moving to common-user@, Bcc'ing general@] > > If you know where you need to have your print statements you can use > AspectJ to do runtime injection of needed java code into desirable > spots. You don't need to even touch the source code for that - just > instrument (weave) the jar file > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:19, Bo Sang wrote: > > Hi, guys: > > > > I would like to do some minor modification of Hadoop (just to insert some > > print codes into particular places). And I have the following questions: > > > > 1. It seems there are three parts of Hadoop: common, hdfs, mapred. And > they > > are packed as three independent jar packages. Could I only modify one > part > > (eg, common) and pack a new jar package without modifying the rest two. > > > > 2. I have try to import the folder hadoop-0.21.0/common into eclipse as a > > project. But eclipse fails to recognize it as an existing project. But if > I > > import folder hadoop-0.21.0 as a existing project, it works. However, I > only > > want to modify common part. How could I only modify common part and > export > > a new common jar package without modifying the rest two parts. > > > > -- > > Best Regards! > > > > Sincerely > > Bo Sang > > > -- Best Regards! Sincerely Bo Sang --20cf303dd75865083b049f2a22c1-- From general-return-3187-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:57:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56350 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:57:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:57:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 35468 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:03:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35392 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:03:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35335 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:03:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:03:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:03:43 +0000 Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so4569320yia.35 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=22/8P2Q/E70qAO0+oRsCASfu0ifq2ACkbSoI90JYtJA=; b=V46jEAtVIg3cQ9XeG/SUT/LqI3VAHsJW72IxZSQS36YU9MweygJ9rCd5MjPweFqIys Ww4/Egvxwm2oRmdtcz8CukuGZENkOZZePj159N5+eKXz0YGtSL7Hky5gxrpevcayIlG9 7wX5Jd0fJqrE0gxmNvaxUCyo047eNevxQPCn4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=lflwKhCwWKjMQH3FpTOWrnRD6Ge6zrPjUS/YjDccvvLJ5pPs/eshw8NtLomvWV8KQQ so/krghFev/DL9ozj2o1TMmFEmositj+GP+aKdS4lFJ8icAJm/sRL5zyLGhU0VrUF3JF trcz9aH+BpPFPdtzCPTyG0S/FnXJL43H5rQV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.170.74 with SMTP id e10mr4119022icz.56.1300899802044; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.162.197 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:03:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: teMvtYYDgQJCDyIY_SZEEJzIILM Message-ID: Subject: Re: google snappy From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Weishung Chung Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (Please don't cross-post like that, it only adds confusion. I put everything in bcc and posted to general instead) Their README says the following: Snappy usually is faster than algorithms in the same class (e.g. LZO, LZF, FastLZ, QuickLZ, etc.) while achieving comparable compression ratios. Somebody obviously needs to publish some benchmarks, but knowing Snappy's origin I can believe that claim. Relevant jiras: HADOOP-7206 Integrate Snappy compression HBASE-3691 Add compressor support for 'snappy', google's compressor J-D On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Weishung Chung wrote: > Hey my fellow hadoop/hbase developers, > > I just came across this google compression/decompression package yesterday, > could we make a good use of this compression scheme in hadoop? It's written > in C++ though. > > http://code.google.com/p/snappy/ > > I haven't looked close into this snappy > package yet but i would love to know about the differences compared to LZO. > > Thank you, > Wei Shung > From general-return-3192-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 08:43:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15241 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 08:43:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 08:43:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 98357 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 08:43:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98136 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 08:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98128 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 08:43:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:43:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:43:30 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so3025590ewy.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GbtlBDD7TNLK3r59L2ra62e/A7t4xcmxBz4VtadzY1w=; b=ZBJO7m+n9Rtoxn+n5tEvj5O2IDC8NLMkBLUlM9KGwZzyuDgiuiRDYzPlnOE1UEMZ8d DiYuyEKWAWG82iEThUu4Gsam/cKyG7R0Caaaby0L/DZRRJ8XjfWgMApH5IIW2rQfWHZT GBgsAPGo28ISFYP/uewNamutIAdP0Lz+qE/UQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C3NZFriSsv/gapV8scghUdk/hDd9ZGR67U4uJ8GZJDwG/Mpe0HnbStigqyrPSGbzhG N7hPdE/5ZA4F2RebVyHaZ6Kx6O3F66Q8PY+evrRG0aNLLvvNLMW0ttnO3RP6j4zXw5kJ OkdTcWVF2mU4PyLzJoWlQ01Wn5x37tMylqHvE= Received: by 10.213.113.205 with SMTP id b13mr162754ebq.62.1300956188621; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.19.4.124] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm4298924eeh.5.2011.03.24.01.43.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8B041A.7020007@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:43:06 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Problem with NameNode Storage: IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Right now I'm having this issue on my cluster: On NameNode web interface at the bottom of the page is table: NameNode Storage Storage Directory Type State /srv/dfs/name IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed I have had this issue before, and I rebooted Hadoop, but lost many files. What can I do now that I won't lose files since last backup, and what this warning actually means? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Wojciech Langiewicz From general-return-3193-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 08:51:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60165 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 08:51:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 08:51:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 9654 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 08:51:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9591 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 08:51:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9583 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 08:51:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:51:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:51:42 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so11451105fxm.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZVc2rH68hoyyTSB2Kqxe6XT9tDCyzST+jqLN4EPePiE=; b=hjGMN0f3/l1iZjJ0qLq5PdIrk2ysRSwmH91vgDugCbzV5MsntTWNhe6oLUJ9yxcyQe odSvUteK4zZYAyXMwMdeXSnjbwDT4T/nwYxRE8N9/ZztoO+yJH8e/LYmHoYtbZG6WAeD 1+oUQcu3Xbh7XTZqLwFTzJgUIRXFyvcwa7Kxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bsw82wIbqmawx0ijnO1sfD1uUQLhU9oKkUh1lbFmuAlvCkDOBA0Oxg6OXKelmtSiKR lYOTj1sroaI6DMF3qX21B/UpW1/xI8fSjGL8Ai83tl6G9fSUxKHv6PEXd8rCBjUJv6G+ F/sxJ+46FSPCOWZRwp3cad9uqI2dQ7qbjNEdY= Received: by 10.223.101.87 with SMTP id b23mr2217413fao.97.1300956682101; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:51:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.123.139 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:51:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D8B041A.7020007@gmail.com> References: <4D8B041A.7020007@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:21:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with NameNode Storage: IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, Can you verify and confirm if that location (is it the only one?) is a valid one (as in, has free space left, is not corrupt, etc.)? Take a backup of whatever exists at your dfs.name.dir before you proceed doing anything. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Hello, > Right now I'm having this issue on my cluster: > On NameNode web interface at the bottom of the page is table: > NameNode Storage > Storage Directory =A0 =A0 =A0 Type =A0 =A0State > /srv/dfs/name =A0 IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed > > I have had this issue before, and I rebooted Hadoop, but lost many files. > What can I do now that I won't lose files since last backup, and what thi= s > warning actually means? > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > -- > Wojciech Langiewicz > --=20 Harsh J http://harshj.com From general-return-3194-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 09:02:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79814 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 09:02:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 09:02:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 23152 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:02:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23097 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23089 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 09:02:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:02:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:01:58 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so3029833ewy.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aCOrFItOjYPByRMaaoPZkC27PQKZa1d9SV336lBhEKs=; b=HD7xOu8mFz2lm2/u08Xdv/todUXjqpMxmR2clL8bHUK6DzU7Kx6fbsmw3QZG1qzG5O CKLiE5oMFpgDsMUX/rEwJH2Eb4M4vXoKzFDDIHBqlffnQP6cLSPJ2m8b46iWSQCAEx/8 +gTmpVDCNAVxLmqbC8BO0kxrCvZkAp1GppsLA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GgVCSBdaCN13oE3PjWqkXmrw7XD6j1KSRCY/9XiK4NVJUgTPeUsKfUio645ktz0M5h +w5dCDGeGWVtech4go19vWYHJVDbT3cAjJKO4wZHVCrPZerZAw9S/UAZWK6aNkv1sdqP /exD3aRZslIP0iCTjI31+uUq61OKE2ge93P4Y= Received: by 10.213.16.199 with SMTP id p7mr171789eba.13.1300957297812; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.19.4.124] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b52sm4312347eei.22.2011.03.24.02.01.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8B086F.9030708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:01:35 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with NameNode Storage: IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed References: <4D8B041A.7020007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, Yes, it's the only one, it has free space, and is not corrupted locally. I have found this exception in namenode logs: 2011-03-24 09:46:51,531 WARN org.mortbay.log: /getimage: java.io.IOException: GetImage failed. java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.getImageFile(FSImage.java:219) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.getFsImageName(FSImage.java:1584) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet$1.run(GetImageServlet.java:75) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet$1.run(GetImageServlet.java:70) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1063) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet.doGet(GetImageServlet.java:70) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:826) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:864) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:533) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:207) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) It appears there every 5 minutes. On 24.03.2011 09:51, Harsh J wrote: > Hello, > > Can you verify and confirm if that location (is it the only one?) is a > valid one (as in, has free space left, is not corrupt, etc.)? > > Take a backup of whatever exists at your dfs.name.dir before you > proceed doing anything. > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz > wrote: >> Hello, >> Right now I'm having this issue on my cluster: >> On NameNode web interface at the bottom of the page is table: >> NameNode Storage >> Storage Directory Type State >> /srv/dfs/name IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed >> >> I have had this issue before, and I rebooted Hadoop, but lost many files. >> What can I do now that I won't lose files since last backup, and what this >> warning actually means? >> Any help would be greatly appreciated. >> -- >> Wojciech Langiewicz >> > > > From general-return-3195-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 09:26:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59506 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 09:26:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 09:26:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 45959 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:26:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45912 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:26:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45904 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 09:26:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:26:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:26:22 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so3036643ewy.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:26:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wctRIIpik535e5Izw5UIbJg70Fb6I1IxOV5nKlgk+6w=; b=IAIrb12MCcVldgzsxfEHeG4512EfaJa6w4cZyMg0CtuvL5iRXdS2qaZL+SQgWZa566 2o42gau5vzI21jP6Bn/0v6AUIQWVFJ+rBt/Kak5ZJ4/81OcWIbLTyvtwT5yxqKnFqee0 97elOoXU1ql2GAuiDrSyXIp7AfEoqYBUEub8Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ew+b/zoZIBFXDzuJ70a5yfGsd54MkYQFrMe8HRj0PVqiWDcI09rADDtWnr0TcQmIEY As2eQY2Zjgi8fPFhb8Nvfdx/XPeN+o4vC3sijMgAkzqN7sAql9z/pWv0V1wnQ/cBLw7U i2+hDeGAs+f7s6FGGCTY5JEQx6PxqD/4TeYZU= Received: by 10.213.111.11 with SMTP id q11mr3827392ebp.19.1300958760794; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.19.4.124] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b52sm4329520eei.1.2011.03.24.02.25.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8B0E27.6080909@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:25:59 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with NameNode Storage: IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed References: <4D8B041A.7020007@gmail.com> <4D8B086F.9030708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8B086F.9030708@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Before that there's another exception which shows that someone must have changed setting from 64k back to 1024. So probably I would like to know if there is a command to manually trigger saving metadata from NN that after rebooting everything should be ok. java.io.IOException: Too many open files at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:145) at org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector$1.acceptChannel(SelectChannelConnector.java:75) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectorManager$SelectSet.doSelect(SelectorManager.java:498) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectorManager.doSelect(SelectorManager.java:185) at org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector.accept(SelectChannelConnector.java:124) at org.mortbay.jetty.AbstractConnector$Acceptor.run(AbstractConnector.java:707) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) On 24.03.2011 10:01, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Hello, > Yes, it's the only one, it has free space, and is not corrupted locally. > I have found this exception in namenode logs: > 2011-03-24 09:46:51,531 WARN org.mortbay.log: /getimage: > java.io.IOException: GetImage failed. java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.getImageFile(FSImage.java:219) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.getFsImageName(FSImage.java:1584) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet$1.run(GetImageServlet.java:75) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet$1.run(GetImageServlet.java:70) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at > org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1063) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.GetImageServlet.doGet(GetImageServlet.java:70) > > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:826) > > at > org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) > > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:864) > > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:533) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:207) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at > org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > > at > org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > > > It appears there every 5 minutes. > > On 24.03.2011 09:51, Harsh J wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can you verify and confirm if that location (is it the only one?) is a >> valid one (as in, has free space left, is not corrupt, etc.)? >> >> Take a backup of whatever exists at your dfs.name.dir before you >> proceed doing anything. >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Right now I'm having this issue on my cluster: >>> On NameNode web interface at the bottom of the page is table: >>> NameNode Storage >>> Storage Directory Type State >>> /srv/dfs/name IMAGE_AND_EDITS Failed >>> >>> I have had this issue before, and I rebooted Hadoop, but lost many >>> files. >>> What can I do now that I won't lose files since last backup, and what >>> this >>> warning actually means? >>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. >>> -- >>> Wojciech Langiewicz >>> >> >> >> > From general-return-3196-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 23:30:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65380 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 23:30:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 23:30:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 41105 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 23:29:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41058 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 23:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41050 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 23:29:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:29:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:29:51 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so638394wyb.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.61.65 with SMTP id v43mr1185683wec.84.1301009371360; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.253.240.139] ([84.233.227.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c54sm146098wer.30.2011.03.24.16.29.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <8A6FDBD1-0B3D-4EEA-9792-058FEDC37575@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-579622931 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Hadoop project wins MediaGuardian Innovation Award Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:29:29 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-2-579622931 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Hadoop project won the top MediaGuardian Innovation award. The article is below: Groundbreaking open source project wins top MediaGuardian Innovation Award. All of the contributors should be very proud of this award. Three members of the Hadoop Project Management Committee were there to receive the award on behalf of the project. I've been working on Hadoop full time since the beginning and it has been a pleasure working with such bright and dedicated engineers. It takes a village to raise an elephant from a prototype that runs on a few nodes to the project that is disrupting the big data industry. Congratulations Hadoop team! -- Owen --Apple-Mail-2-579622931-- From general-return-3197-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 06:03:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42158 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 06:03:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 06:03:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 7126 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 06:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7052 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 06:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7042 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 06:03:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:03:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of weishung@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:03:23 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1092618bwz.35 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:03:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=U1/DyoKlIoqBueDEbkoH//QtodZVaLPsOQzYg0PXNU4=; b=fbN0ooHkFsSz1Rd7K4W1uXK0EtRiFjpaOUi08dZEZrx+obNNuOGeifYlymuTEZkF8J Pcg05qNJOk5vhI6LCuLlsxzwNVcbRNI4r+rWmNrpPVWv9ghJxzRmUSgyk6QdxCGDQHfE DejK7BC02CweZFN2m3P8j0LVbHPWrhDscNYoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=bHjwXl02b3UPjjp+NGFUpOnc7F8/c27TKB/NqHCSY3qW/L052PE5nDcal4WX5QvJyQ ZFthkSMI9YsNpp/sQvxSNtG86VzQUNTbOO9Ix/n9WrNQiw0Xru1SLpv8dY2+F7UihIZr tM9rqMzp/8lJL/iyxlnGzz5lCPtVrwGM3g0vA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr322376bks.52.1301032982245; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.20.1 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 01:03:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: congrats !!! From: Weishung Chung To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Doug Cutting , omalley@apache.org, Stack , jdcryans@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507bf718b049f48585f --0016e6dab507bf718b049f48585f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My fellow Apache Hadoop developers, Congratulations for winning the top prize at the 2011 MediaGuardian Innovation Awards ! I don't know how you all do this, but I am truly impressed with your works and having so fun browsing and learning from your beautiful piece of art. Thank you again for always answering my questions on the mailing lists :D Wei Shung --0016e6dab507bf718b049f48585f-- From general-return-3198-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 10:37:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29291 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 10:37:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 10:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 30365 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 10:37:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29661 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 10:37:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29495 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 10:37:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:37:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:37:18 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanaghi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q34O1-0005lb-Im; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:36:57 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: BerlinBuzzwords 2011 Early Bird Ticket Period ends on April 7th. Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:36:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: user@mahout.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3911021.xfUZaYUefh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103250336.56455.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart3911021.xfUZaYUefh Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey folks, just a short notice for those who haven't noticed we have only a limited amount of Early-Bird tickets left and the Early-Bird period is ends on April 7th. If you want to get one of the 30 remaining tickets go and get one now here: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/tickets While we are still working on the schedule and selecting speakers we didn't send out any reject mail yet. So if you have submitted a talk for BerlinBuzzwords 2011 you don't need to get a Early-Bird ticket now. All potential speakers will be eligible for Early-Bird discount even after April 7th. regards, Isabel --nextPart3911021.xfUZaYUefh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk2McEgACgkQPJpCBAwIhbRpcgCfQt2qll68aQffEICMNR6asyKO wlUAniVq0gcPuyC2Ec1avTWvjRpfPaM5 =2OgN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3911021.xfUZaYUefh-- From general-return-3199-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 13:37:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 13:37:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 13:37:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 75715 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 13:37:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75657 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 13:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75642 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 13:37:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:37:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:36:56 +0000 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so9175181wwk.5 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OUMN1q6CNY2ObOvaPliG4BKqsqP5Mdk+DOnTytM+aJs=; b=xRbDqu8Y+rqjqs04RBZ0X/76VIfHfuiD1nkafR5RwprBXuu07ACYGWmmt5c9RynB3l qEcyR1mPbTRe/N5qZfLllbBdbmAiHY+OhraYMQ/plG3qLx2tqt2392TeJLn071zqF0JM mVLZge5p77yEjS+tg8daMF27R9vxxB7z2b/Qw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nGUfoTH6sG0KR6+aQh1PQrsVdsbTgvHwb9+SplWrpE4345RT0JxsVAOtSO5q2dHWqx UG9lG2ljTeq9a2C7Tgo3EN+JLBe90C9r72EC2yG8BefJAs1uUclJLiD+WUsLKrqqObof 372StbvePUeSsRdPtwLyz9mp+mEnGeGQZ+zII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.64.139 with SMTP id c11mr1879923wed.46.1301060192900; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.21.82 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:36:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: problem with writeUTF From: Alessandro Binhara To: cdh-user@cloudera.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=000e0cd56c5aa11936049f4eaeeb --000e0cd56c5aa11936049f4eaeeb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd56c5aa1191e049f4eaee9 --000e0cd56c5aa1191e049f4eaee9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello all .. I write some programs to hadoop here .. and i had a problem with writeUTF .. It put a null in every line begin . See in attachement .. Whats happen? How to remove this null ? thanks --000e0cd56c5aa1191e049f4eaee9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all ..=A0

I write some programs to hadoop here .. = and i had a problem with writeUTF ..=A0
It put a null in every li= ne begin .=A0

See in attachement ..=A0
<= br>
Whats happen? How to remove this null ?=A0

th= anks=A0

--000e0cd56c5aa1191e049f4eaee9-- --000e0cd56c5aa11936049f4eaeeb-- From general-return-3200-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 17:08:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26402 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 17:08:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 17:08:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 73489 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 17:08:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73405 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 17:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73389 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 17:08:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:08:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:07:53 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1734981wyb.35 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:07:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zD20KBQP8zKMNNv20kTNsbsabkx2o9eUjTaxmiv9k28=; b=yEafrKNkAN1ragXybtL5Ym57C4R1flrV8mTt8kfqVG7I/+Tqo7xq/HyIx/UiTHQEuB Dk9yZ7NMNwaHXfXGixxdGgql/ZzzgU0FN8Wpw+7hkKCyr8/VVtS7QppadQBnQjfvDAeM m3aM1j2H57lIlv5jwr8tUPfL2zLLx/GCbYOyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cVE+bE3Dl7Rq8zCq1ZDMH1WNK3pX+Hyx6qguiqwDj7hUl9vXmI3ne0+LWshbz9Pl+u VOmlyEB6C9q0mwaxJenZ1b9poQCbCMxPW9K8OuOhiHH/F+bAyiOyDIhgQAKi2E5j+eEr 7KOD2HftDvPnRk1RrQxQHBhfb28lNi/znWFf8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.64.139 with SMTP id c11mr2087797wed.46.1301072818931; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.21.82 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:06:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:06:58 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with writeUTF From: Alessandro Binhara To: cdh-user@cloudera.org Cc: Mapred Learn , "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd56c5a330a91049f519f37 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd56c5a330a91049f519f37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OHOHOHO Thanks .. It s working now!!!! On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mapred Learn wrote: > I also had this problem And ended up switching to : > Write instead of writeUTF: > Write(outputBytes, 0, outputBytes.length) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > > > Hello all .. > > > > I write some programs to hadoop here .. and i had a problem with writeUTF > .. > > It put a null in every line begin . > > > > See in attachement .. > > > > Whats happen? How to remove this null ? > > > > thanks > > > > > --000e0cd56c5a330a91049f519f37-- From general-return-3201-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 20:11:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23850 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 20:11:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 20:11:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 49426 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 20:11:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49375 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 20:11:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49367 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 20:11:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:11:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:11:48 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1231928wwi.29 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=01XFGNYp+uH8Bd4scG9ZxuYEaBIESaOEOGFN2TGMfH8=; b=MDb+jd6B6J7lhemYTsgA9Jhtmzq1xg8C621+UEZQI5XtL3EKlZqmYfyxd/nWJtc/QT VP5L91dkWsoUf0Jzr+0vZa7CKWZQw0Zp5WO+uunHUpeJNk7sV4X4wUpCiq4zyFIpOeKz TmIqWV14QrySO8E4mY7mf2xLd9G5+kr6HZ4h0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JWIjLuAGWk7GCYXMRHOsLIPhfEDkFH8vZBife2xWDCvZ3SH9Au3dTLoCjwT0w5eNfB 5NaotIJZ/sYuVT8SGEfSgv4FbXVfx/yf6BTCA8wrSXszqPKsp4msrPKs1cwLrND/7M1W Uw2R0068SHO8YkJ/RlyO24aUACB6QgaEMf5Co= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.200.82 with SMTP id y60mr1121735wen.31.1301083888178; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.21.82 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:11:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: NameNode is not formatted. From: Alessandro Binhara To: cdh-user@cloudera.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab59efa5613049f54320e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dab59efa5613049f54320e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Helo ... all... I chance in hdfs-site.xml data dir , like this : dfs.name.dir /var/hadoop/ dfs.data.dir /var/hadoop/ i try format a hdfs with su -s /bin/bash - hdfs -c 'hadoop namenode -format' wel.. it ask if i would like RE Format a hdfs : -->>> Re-format filesystem in /var/hadoop ? (Y or N) I sad YES... but not happing . I see a permission dir on /var/hadoop drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 2011-03-25 20:05 hadoop Then a try run a name-node and i receive a message : java.io.IOException: NameNode is not formatted. Whats happen ??? thanks --0016e6dab59efa5613049f54320e-- From general-return-3202-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 01:06:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27943 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 01:06:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 01:06:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 61374 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 01:06:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61300 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 01:06:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61292 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 01:06:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:06:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kntreadway@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:05:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3218952bwz.35 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9gwNJ/izRd32xo/fhTk/h/rG4mCqNMd2DVRz9BamjEg=; b=msP9R0wP+ZpHBcIEghsKM+U0lFjBN+gHjJlk83DMejRzXpFll0tT4NG1QWC6sDOxD0 9L6bmqJ7hz4NM+GH+E6aFI8GgmiAWG7T7aW0ilB1gSX/TQJB2nvpOaHxF60xlavpSx2g osgRYyISueWQ9Uem/UyaeZe7Z3Vc65ibEI050= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=SlAxu1a0HPTcptoPrQSBVUojOBJ9JyiEcuDGc0N9lWLKS/+hl8a4hICnUSMtTt38au h/EPlZ8cTv637bl6vhamd/nBMxBAcbkFRkN9BvrUP4wu3CsrvWfhm01CliOns0LR9iMo mma20vC8nMJWckvQAa+RsxpBSFVtbzbI0b9+g= Received: by 10.204.34.73 with SMTP id k9mr3231934bkd.189.1301274332995; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:05:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.130 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:05:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Nichole Treadway Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:05:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NameNode is not formatted. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Alessandro Binhara , cdh-user@cloudera.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325559e265fa032049f808a58 --000325559e265fa032049f808a58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Try changing dfs.data.dir value to "/var/hadoop/dfs/data" and dfs.name.dir to "/var/hadoop/dfs/name". Create this /var/hadoop/dfs directory with the appropriate permissions. Re-format again and see if that helps. On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > Helo ... all... > > > I chance in hdfs-site.xml data dir , like this : > > > dfs.name.dir > /var/hadoop/ > > > > dfs.data.dir > /var/hadoop/ > > > i try format a hdfs with > su -s /bin/bash - hdfs -c 'hadoop namenode -format' > > wel.. it ask if i would like RE Format a hdfs : > -->>> Re-format filesystem in /var/hadoop ? (Y or N) > > I sad YES... but not happing . > I see a permission dir on /var/hadoop > drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 2011-03-25 20:05 hadoop > > Then a try run a name-node and i receive a message : > > java.io.IOException: NameNode is not formatted. > > > Whats happen ??? > > thanks > --000325559e265fa032049f808a58-- From general-return-3203-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 18:28:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97791 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 18:28:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 18:28:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 75864 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 18:28:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75814 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 18:28:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75801 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 18:28:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:28:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:28:40 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3856335vws.35 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.73.196 with SMTP id n4mr5945030vdv.227.1301336899749; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.72.184.42] (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm776043vch.5.2011.03.28.11.28.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <4C3CD35C-B9DB-47ED-9B0E-BEDB869C7670@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <8A6FDBD1-0B3D-4EEA-9792-058FEDC37575@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-907149698 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop project wins MediaGuardian Innovation Award Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:28:16 -0700 References: <8A6FDBD1-0B3D-4EEA-9792-058FEDC37575@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-2-907149698 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The Hadoop project won the top MediaGuardian Innovation award. I've put up some pictures of the event at: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/03/hadoop-project-wins-innovation-award/ -- Owen --Apple-Mail-2-907149698-- From general-return-3204-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 06:28:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6575 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 06:28:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 06:28:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 81271 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 06:28:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81181 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 06:28:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81173 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 06:28:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:28:25 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1882604gxk.35 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aVyyAqxYMZcUIn4H7DUBuAovldRiyVaYBSkwoQD0JqU=; b=HX7CJZpNKaihbZ3ksr1UIaDEyxIu+K1JS2XdmXf1FQ5qWwcgFSJbFJSr3IkD8vitzU ss9zALEEX0d4lFlkxYHZuvI+PL0oNVmQ2dQKrmi61o+7DjskItzaNpPdgHlATLzjk1rI P4vajS7n/fMYLqkV6AsSEaTmjG/ZVovF+AIrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bcBHOkkx8n4ORIr7hknsaraMwBbMRl+FApGSjG9yxr3Q4YF7okPghMokIrza2EhZI2 MZxOTd3BO/7w/igKnaou/aRXNJZobE94MSZvj25IMYnBml4RV/PJqRzOw/0goNNYoOyI D0YSHDTSMeFBy+UIq/D/6MjWkR9pAeRkE7i0c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.182.138 with SMTP id o10mr6648365yhm.65.1301380083990; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.168.19 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:28:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C3CD35C-B9DB-47ED-9B0E-BEDB869C7670@apache.org> References: <8A6FDBD1-0B3D-4EEA-9792-058FEDC37575@apache.org> <4C3CD35C-B9DB-47ED-9B0E-BEDB869C7670@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:28:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop project wins MediaGuardian Innovation Award From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b12909fc1e6049f99290b --20cf305b12909fc1e6049f99290b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I like that small "Fire exit" sign in the corner of the first picture. :-) Congratulations to everybody! --Konstantin On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The Hadoop project won the top MediaGuardian Innovation award. >> > > I've put up some pictures of the event at: > > > http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/03/hadoop-project-wins-innovation-award/ > > -- Owen --20cf305b12909fc1e6049f99290b-- From general-return-3205-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 09:32:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22298 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 09:32:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 09:32:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 98200 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 09:32:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98138 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 09:32:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98130 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 09:32:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:32:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:32:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24860B7F34 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:32:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wtroA2qHZyuJ for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:32:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163D1B7F85 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:32:11 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1301995920.41091@qc1GDzkO9src4I0555gcDQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p2T9Vx27000400 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:31:59 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4D91A70F.9020604@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:31:59 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop project wins MediaGuardian Innovation Award References: <8A6FDBD1-0B3D-4EEA-9792-058FEDC37575@apache.org> <4C3CD35C-B9DB-47ED-9B0E-BEDB869C7670@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4C3CD35C-B9DB-47ED-9B0E-BEDB869C7670@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p2T9Vx27000400 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 28/03/11 19:28, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> The Hadoop project won the top MediaGuardian Innovation award. > > I've put up some pictures of the event at: > > http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/03/hadoop-project-wins-innovation-award/ > Plus some more of Owen the next day holding the award and pointing at a branch diagram that scares everyone http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_l/sets/72157626356732562/ From general-return-3206-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 17:34:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96305 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 17:34:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 17:34:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 87664 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:34:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87580 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:34:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87572 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 17:34:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:34:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:33:57 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so629506fxm.35 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F3otnSY+AFzUGa2RJccVICOCHt0wI5qdrMsde/5mjRM=; b=C2zzcEw2PobwyURTjPrZNhb07c/O5SV3yoABUT+j1c00UM4TmWCqTTKIuEVUo/+h73 xyG0/no6p2UqLd7kaPxYHp3tftVl47JlHfv+/Y0aDg/IgKKCAt+QkUx4pSUjkPa4xTU5 PzBZPj9WbF5GI8IK+T1AOwiJ1Td5JYV6X6Ixc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tarXbCzcHTSuLNL9ufyO3GnXxD9ncrBi0/v0YBH7X5c6ntk+O+VgQgRtsphVv3dwZ6 nI1I7k194/jl14ssAFUF4q9KvRF/TbIznUYPiFwjXnBtAg9TC9Ni3ravIWmUObwE19d9 fXPr/5SEd15WnaOcaFy3pDcKOq9pTFri0+JKg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.66.200 with SMTP id o8mr83976fai.38.1301420016294; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.25.82 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46ED7CAE-5DE6-4453-8E04-802055EBE379@tynt.com> References: <46ED7CAE-5DE6-4453-8E04-802055EBE379@tynt.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:33:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U205U_BbRd65e9w8okZk0B55JK4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop in Canada From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (moving to general@ since this is not a question regarding the usage of the hadoop commons, which I BCC'd) I moved from Montreal to SF a year and a half ago because I saw two things 1) companies weren't interested (they are still trying to get rid of COBOL or worse) or didn't have the data to use Hadoop (not enough big companies) and 2) the universities were either uninterested or just amused by this "new comer". I know of one company that really does cool stuff with Hadoop in Montreal and it's Hopper (www.hopper.travel, they are still in closed alpha AFAIK) who also organized hackreduce.org last weekend. This is what their CEO has to say to the question "Is there something you would do differently now if you would start it over?": Move to the Valley. (see the rest here http://nextmontreal.com/product-market-fit-hopper-travel-fred-lalonde/) I'm sure there are a lot of other companies that are either considering using or already using Hadoop to some extent in Canada but, like anything else, only a portion of them are interested in talking about it or even organizing an event. I would actually love to see something getting organized and I'd be on the first plane to Y**, but I'm afraid that to achieve any sort of critical mass you'd have to fly in people from all the provinces. Air Canada becomes a SPOF :P Now that I think about it, there's probably enough Canucks around here that use Hadoop that we could have our own little user group. If you want to have a nice vacation and geek out with us, feel free to stop by and say hi. J-D On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:21 AM, James Seigel wrote: > Hello, > > You might remember me from a couple of weeks back asking if there were an= y Calgary people interested in a =93meetup=94 about #bigdata or using hadoo= p. =A0Well, I=92ve expanded my search a little to see if any of my Canadian= brothers and sisters are using the elephant for good or for evil. =A0It mi= ght be harder to grab coffee, but it would be fun to see where everyone is. > > Shout out if you=92d like or ping me, I think it=92d be fun to chat! > > Cheers > James Seigel > Captain Hammer at Tynt.com From general-return-3207-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 18:43:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31045 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 18:43:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 18:43:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 76855 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76797 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76789 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 18:43:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:43:44 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2TIBGKP017858 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:11:16 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7D2A44804F15 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:43:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id CZyWSluNkQOxREiN for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:43:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2TIhM1V025565 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:43:22 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:43:21 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:43:20 -0500 Subject: RE: Hadoop in Canada Thread-Topic: Hadoop in Canada Thread-Index: AcvuN4Cw1h7ekSp+RGKdSJJwBxydWgACYCWQ Message-ID: References: <46ED7CAE-5DE6-4453-8E04-802055EBE379@tynt.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org RnVubnkuLi4NCkJ1dCB0aGUgQ09CT0wgbW9kZWwga2luZCBvZiBsZW5kcyBpdHNlbGYgdG8gSGFk b29wLiANCkl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIGludGVyZXN0aW5nIHRvIHdvcmsgb24gYSBtaWdyYXRpb24gcHJv amVjdC4uLg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBqZGNyeWFuc0Bn bWFpbC5jb20gW21haWx0bzpqZGNyeWFuc0BnbWFpbC5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBKZWFuLURh bmllbCBDcnlhbnMNClNlbnQ6IFR1ZXNkYXksIE1hcmNoIDI5LCAyMDExIDEyOjM0IFBNDQpUbzog Z2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IEhhZG9vcCBpbiBDYW5hZGEN Cg0KKG1vdmluZyB0byBnZW5lcmFsQCBzaW5jZSB0aGlzIGlzIG5vdCBhIHF1ZXN0aW9uIHJlZ2Fy ZGluZyB0aGUgdXNhZ2UNCm9mIHRoZSBoYWRvb3AgY29tbW9ucywgd2hpY2ggSSBCQ0MnZCkNCg0K SSBtb3ZlZCBmcm9tIE1vbnRyZWFsIHRvIFNGIGEgeWVhciBhbmQgYSBoYWxmIGFnbyBiZWNhdXNl IEkgc2F3IHR3bw0KdGhpbmdzIDEpIGNvbXBhbmllcyB3ZXJlbid0IGludGVyZXN0ZWQgKHRoZXkg YXJlIHN0aWxsIHRyeWluZyB0byBnZXQNCnJpZCBvZiBDT0JPTCBvciB3b3JzZSkgb3IgZGlkbid0 IGhhdmUgdGhlIGRhdGEgdG8gdXNlIEhhZG9vcCAobm90DQplbm91Z2ggYmlnIGNvbXBhbmllcykg YW5kIDIpIHRoZSB1bml2ZXJzaXRpZXMgd2VyZSBlaXRoZXIgdW5pbnRlcmVzdGVkDQpvciBqdXN0 IGFtdXNlZCBieSB0aGlzICJuZXcgY29tZXIiLiBJIGtub3cgb2Ygb25lIGNvbXBhbnkgdGhhdCBy ZWFsbHkNCmRvZXMgY29vbCBzdHVmZiB3aXRoIEhhZG9vcCBpbiBNb250cmVhbCBhbmQgaXQncyBI b3BwZXINCih3d3cuaG9wcGVyLnRyYXZlbCwgdGhleSBhcmUgc3RpbGwgaW4gY2xvc2VkIGFscGhh IEFGQUlLKSB3aG8gYWxzbw0Kb3JnYW5pemVkIGhhY2tyZWR1Y2Uub3JnIGxhc3Qgd2Vla2VuZC4g VGhpcyBpcyB3aGF0IHRoZWlyIENFTyBoYXMgdG8NCnNheSB0byB0aGUgcXVlc3Rpb24gIklzIHRo ZXJlIHNvbWV0aGluZyB5b3Ugd291bGQgZG8gZGlmZmVyZW50bHkgbm93DQppZiB5b3Ugd291bGQg c3RhcnQgaXQgb3Zlcj8iOg0KDQpNb3ZlIHRvIHRoZSBWYWxsZXkuDQoNCihzZWUgdGhlIHJlc3Qg aGVyZQ0KaHR0cDovL25leHRtb250cmVhbC5jb20vcHJvZHVjdC1tYXJrZXQtZml0LWhvcHBlci10 cmF2ZWwtZnJlZC1sYWxvbmRlLykNCg0KSSdtIHN1cmUgdGhlcmUgYXJlIGEgbG90IG9mIG90aGVy IGNvbXBhbmllcyB0aGF0IGFyZSBlaXRoZXINCmNvbnNpZGVyaW5nIHVzaW5nIG9yIGFscmVhZHkg dXNpbmcgSGFkb29wIHRvIHNvbWUgZXh0ZW50IGluIENhbmFkYQ0KYnV0LCBsaWtlIGFueXRoaW5n IGVsc2UsIG9ubHkgYSBwb3J0aW9uIG9mIHRoZW0gYXJlIGludGVyZXN0ZWQgaW4NCnRhbGtpbmcg YWJvdXQgaXQgb3IgZXZlbiBvcmdhbml6aW5nIGFuIGV2ZW50Lg0KDQpJIHdvdWxkIGFjdHVhbGx5 IGxvdmUgdG8gc2VlIHNvbWV0aGluZyBnZXR0aW5nIG9yZ2FuaXplZCBhbmQgSSdkIGJlIG9uDQp0 aGUgZmlyc3QgcGxhbmUgdG8gWSoqLCBidXQgSSdtIGFmcmFpZCB0aGF0IHRvIGFjaGlldmUgYW55 IHNvcnQgb2YNCmNyaXRpY2FsIG1hc3MgeW91J2QgaGF2ZSB0byBmbHkgaW4gcGVvcGxlIGZyb20g YWxsIHRoZSBwcm92aW5jZXMuIEFpcg0KQ2FuYWRhIGJlY29tZXMgYSBTUE9GIDpQDQoNCk5vdyB0 aGF0IEkgdGhpbmsgYWJvdXQgaXQsIHRoZXJlJ3MgcHJvYmFibHkgZW5vdWdoIENhbnVja3MgYXJv dW5kIGhlcmUNCnRoYXQgdXNlIEhhZG9vcCB0aGF0IHdlIGNvdWxkIGhhdmUgb3VyIG93biBsaXR0 bGUgdXNlciBncm91cC4gSWYgeW91DQp3YW50IHRvIGhhdmUgYSBuaWNlIHZhY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBn ZWVrIG91dCB3aXRoIHVzLCBmZWVsIGZyZWUgdG8gc3RvcA0KYnkgYW5kIHNheSBoaS4NCg0KPC9y YW50Pg0KDQpKLUQNCg0KT24gVHVlLCBNYXIgMjksIDIwMTEgYXQgNjoyMSBBTSwgSmFtZXMgU2Vp Z2VsIDxqYW1lc0B0eW50LmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IEhlbGxvLA0KPg0KPiBZb3UgbWlnaHQgcmVt ZW1iZXIgbWUgZnJvbSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiB3ZWVrcyBiYWNrIGFza2luZyBpZiB0aGVyZSB3ZXJl IGFueSBDYWxnYXJ5IHBlb3BsZSBpbnRlcmVzdGVkIGluIGEgIm1lZXR1cCIgYWJvdXQgI2JpZ2Rh dGEgb3IgdXNpbmcgaGFkb29wLiCgV2VsbCwgSSd2ZSBleHBhbmRlZCBteSBzZWFyY2ggYSBsaXR0 bGUgdG8gc2VlIGlmIGFueSBvZiBteSBDYW5hZGlhbiBicm90aGVycyBhbmQgc2lzdGVycyBhcmUg dXNpbmcgdGhlIGVsZXBoYW50IGZvciBnb29kIG9yIGZvciBldmlsLiCgSXQgbWlnaHQgYmUgaGFy ZGVyIHRvIGdyYWIgY29mZmVlLCBidXQgaXQgd291bGQgYmUgZnVuIHRvIHNlZSB3aGVyZSBldmVy eW9uZSBpcy4NCj4NCj4gU2hvdXQgb3V0IGlmIHlvdSdkIGxpa2Ugb3IgcGluZyBtZSwgSSB0aGlu ayBpdCdkIGJlIGZ1biB0byBjaGF0IQ0KPg0KPiBDaGVlcnMNCj4gSmFtZXMgU2VpZ2VsDQo+IENh cHRhaW4gSGFtbWVyIGF0IFR5bnQuY29tDQoNCg0KVGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGNvbnRhaW5lZCBp biB0aGlzIGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gbWF5IGJlIENPTkZJREVOVElBTCBhbmQgaXMgaW50ZW5kZWQg b25seSBmb3IgdGhlIHVzZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVjaXBpZW50KHMpIG5hbWVkIGFib3ZlLiAgSWYgeW91 IGFyZSBub3QgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudCwgeW91IGFyZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQg dGhhdCBhbnkgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLCBvciBjb3B5aW5nIG9mIHRoaXMg Y29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiwgb3IgYW55IG9mIGl0cyBjb250ZW50cywgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkgcHJvaGli aXRlZC4gIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBpbiBlcnJvciwg cGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUvZGVzdHJveSB0aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwg bWVzc2FnZSBhbmQgYW55IGNvcHkgb2YgaXQgZnJvbSB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyIG9yIHBhcGVyIGZp bGVzLg0K From general-return-3208-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:46:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14179 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 28433 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28366 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28358 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 21:42:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:42:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:42:16 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so2478153iym.35 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.150.65 with SMTP id z1mr1643762icv.503.1301521315081; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:41:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.220.194 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:41:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:41:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba1efe86a72ff0049fba0bd3 --90e6ba1efe86a72ff0049fba0bd3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Some recent discussion on HDFS-1786 has raised an interesting question: does anyone plan on maintaining the 0.21 branch and eventually releasing an 0.21.1? Should we bother to commit bug fixes to this branch? It seems to me that our time would be better spent getting 0.22 and trunk back to a green state so we can talk about releasing them, rather than applying patches to a branch with no releases planned. Of course a decision now doesn't preclude anyone from stepping up later, backporting patches to 0.21, and releasing an 0.21.1. Thanks -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba1efe86a72ff0049fba0bd3-- From general-return-3209-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:55:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50175 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:55:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:55:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 42647 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42579 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42571 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 21:51:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:51:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.212] (HELO web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:50:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 15108 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Mar 2011 21:50:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1301521829; bh=t7eNBSzIWrZUjKhdH2rsaEmDHIHIJOT2YoyIRP9zvHU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HU1ZYlgpt9zBbNO3HlbzsHfMgA/diXm4zxeJKWOeojTMDowZHrDAqkgJlBrdsdH+2C0GBmMoLde3XBvyTFT8jyHEU4wexCGPU5rXDxixE9bcjGuHczP1GIxQAhWakFQTDmARDl6gxXK4ZBYhStXqbKyNcJMg7vRSg5VLxK00anw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cZD/2hxMKG20KrG5ttQjDdszQI5BUhOAR8s80wsj2vab7h4rYvn1xpmpfhNsAQpi4I+LVWQ7+1r7lFbdYvYQ1hY0wpjNT7icneg55pW4ro7RxHLyTHqEbVrBpZThKDdRCa0R+Z6HJ/x1rmpdEiU710yaMz6FXhI7F0jhZeFqbWs=; Message-ID: <332918.89435.qm@web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Qu5xDBMVM1kmKPdveI3KJt5mX9zhNZe2jSvqPcBPeq0sgF3 nxJPhHIt.6IU6rqdDDutOtAJO.XAnqzmvx2dpe2N.CXPSxNqeFFc4FWv4LuM t5T.JsL2bVo0bzxdBkI1GyFS3CCplwSErJXEyB2xqcJo74T3EnK08IjK_gDg vFBWI8SYXL3lfy1WsC3EWm4A7M9FpOJDp_0n.QtGmeFWi9hCrZopXqv5jBTd _W9ST51j0lYfXQGoAIAOCX6SJxr8cDDh7eHe5Z5W8HM1Rr1zuq_xhoCKHpHq dL8tZfoej1oyjdXKL51KYwic9pQeEVSXaeouBVsqslezvROtoOARRwDm75Tn PhV5.wpdo4Zzc9yELRoEuGb90OhZdMM3266g4Dxioxk18Wr3UM.DAPcVad7C NInlXuVSRwzV_ZfoTUhECK.KIl5hZBk3j9w-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:50:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 References: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-404604782-1301521829=:89435" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-404604782-1301521829=:89435 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I recall that some users are using 0.21. Should we discuss this on the users mailing lists? Nicholas ________________________________ From: Todd Lipcon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 2:41:35 PM Subject: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? Hi all, Some recent discussion on HDFS-1786 has raised an interesting question: does anyone plan on maintaining the 0.21 branch and eventually releasing an 0.21.1? Should we bother to commit bug fixes to this branch? It seems to me that our time would be better spent getting 0.22 and trunk back to a green state so we can talk about releasing them, rather than applying patches to a branch with no releases planned. Of course a decision now doesn't preclude anyone from stepping up later, backporting patches to 0.21, and releasing an 0.21.1. Thanks -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0-404604782-1301521829=:89435-- From general-return-3212-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 07:50:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42264 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 07:50:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 51332 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51203 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51195 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:27 +0000 Received: from crt-01-tr.neofonie.de ([91.213.91.28] helo=essen.neofonie.priv) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Cdo-000Fmm-HD for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:42:36 +0200 From: Isabel Drost To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop in Canada Message-ID: <20110331094236.5335a912@essen.neofonie.priv> In-Reply-To: References: <46ED7CAE-5DE6-4453-8E04-802055EBE379@tynt.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.14.4; x86_64-http://packman.links2linux.de-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 29 Mar 11 Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > I would actually love to see something getting organized and I'd be on > the first plane to Y** Not exactly a meetup but Apache Con () is to take place in Vancouver, includes a "cloud computing" track focused on Hadoop and friends, call for participation is open. Isabel From general-return-3300-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 14:56:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE47A36C8 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52225 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 14:56:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52080 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 14:56:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52064 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 14:56:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:56:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.216.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.216.154] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.216.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:55:58 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p42EtYKi007311; Mon, 2 May 2011 10:55:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.4/Submit) id p42EtX5O007309; Mon, 2 May 2011 10:55:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@mail.cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from [10.173.214.212] by mail.cs.ucf.edu with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.2); 02 May 2011 10:55:33 -0400 Date: 02 May 2011 10:55:33 -0400 From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: questions about hadoop map reduce and compute intensive related applications Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 > Integrating MPI with map-reduce is currently difficult and/or very ugly, > however. Not impossible and there are hackish ways to do the job, but > they are hacks. There is an project out of Sandia National Lab that puts MR and MPI together in a library if you're interested --> http://www.sandia.gov/~sjplimp/mapreduce.html The project isn't mature yet, and I haven't actually used it myself. -- -- Grant Mackey PhD student Computer Engineering University of Central Florida From general-return-3301-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 19:03:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36A5F380D for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16023 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:03:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15921 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:03:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15913 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 19:03:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:03:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:03:23 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p42J2sVP084661 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304362974; bh=2Tq7Ut2yQaddpQ7ojPId/LK/m3O+Fekw71ucVq0bcwU=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=f8YYQM25x7zhvV03zU/Y7kCZadrK20xzvZfDug96hce/A0e+6yqp5b068cKiLKMGe cvAjo+8/VHLaTlCVm4vmAIAy10SnFNine8X63mpq3MLQ2ULNoTGf+9MMgEf4mBhyR2 HjcFaD1SAA1zxgHsWlvhuN8R6s6WvcFwmfO4zVl0= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Mon, 2 May 2011 12:02:53 -0700 From: Avik Dey To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:02:52 -0700 Subject: [hadoop] Hadoop Summit 2011 by Yahoo!: June 29th, Santa Clara Convention Center. Register and submit abstract for presentation: www.hadoopsummit.org Thread-Topic: [hadoop] Hadoop Summit 2011 by Yahoo!: June 29th, Santa Clara Convention Center. Register and submit abstract for presentation: www.hadoopsummit.org Thread-Index: Acv00YctyjaYKtraRSmrGT2TejdLtw== Message-ID: <2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330A03F46EE@SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330A03F46EESP1EX07VS02ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330A03F46EESP1EX07VS02ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Folks, The Hadoop Summit 2011 abstract submission closes on May 6th i.e. this Frid= ay. I know there are still some of you that are working on the presentation abs= tract for the Summit, thought I would send a gentle reminder. :-) See you at the Summit. Avik --_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330A03F46EESP1EX07VS02ds_-- From general-return-3302-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 19:16:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7FBA35CF for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47724 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:16:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47646 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:16:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47638 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 19:16:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:16:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:16:17 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3970322qwj.35 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 12:15:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=joDKblDQ8s/8sS5Ne4SChIBt93VTUyHdh/DIZ/ZdAFI=; b=a1qnq7Bn3j3IfYInRlvR8ERXv/ynWw6YysS066aiMFI7sojpyA9jqcHOS6MrudX1U4 97e4PavDXKxo+fEdSzuuR9iGK3TNMSnXfV+xapR8wMzpAsac0HwIzIsBqAmymQUXyoQJ ruQWu6p+tML9JjLnXpZwXOCEOBt1eACUVZ2zY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=tlqs7HJSU2NrHeF8sV7iNbM46Vas7SeFWWAoJ57OhwctHNUpyI3ETUNsxt20NdlNA4 t1j+S8OoPXzzdtfrvQ+JdheDx2I0V88QQcGBxdcBrYFlQXSZcs1FU1tX8Lln88SVbnQU f+xz3xX3HDL1wnBQjhyludlEYvVSPib4uER3Y= Received: by 10.224.28.193 with SMTP id n1mr6596938qac.225.1304363755705; Mon, 02 May 2011 12:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.214] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm4177050qcs.11.2011.05.02.12.15.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 May 2011 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 05:15:48 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) moving this thread to general@ On May 3, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> Should we release >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc0/? >=20 > The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a > community process. A massive patch set was committed en-masse with no > public discussion before or after about its specific composition. guys... 1. do we agree this is an issue 2. if it is, how we do get the communication & discussion on list? what do people think are the major issues that are stopping people = talking about stuff on list are?= From general-return-3303-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5940E3DCE for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11871 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11823 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11809 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:06:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:06:03 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p42K5P1c025481; Mon, 2 May 2011 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Mon, 2 May 2011 13:05:25 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:05:14 -0700 Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Topic: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Index: AcwJBEYcLmBlmTsNT4u2XhdmLVQJTQ== Message-ID: <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi folks, This strikes me as a bit odd. I think we have already discussed this at len= gth and agreed that a release could proceed.=20 Since then, Arun and Owen have worked actively to incorporated community fe= edback into this release.=20 All parties making Hadoop releases other then Apache have already incorpora= ted most of the patches in this release into their products, including doug= 's organization. I don't see how Hadoop's users benefit from Apache not inc= orporating them into an Apache release.=20 As previously discussed, all parties are welcome to champion altenative rel= eases from Apache if they want to invest in making Apache Hadoop better. Thanks!! E14 --- E14 - typing on glass On May 2, 2011, at 12:16 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > moving this thread to general@ >=20 > On May 3, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >=20 >>> Should we release >>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc0/? >>=20 >> The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a >> community process. A massive patch set was committed en-masse with no >> public discussion before or after about its specific composition. >=20 > guys... > 1. do we agree this is an issue > 2. if it is, how we do get the communication & discussion on list? >=20 > what do people think are the major issues that are stopping people talkin= g about stuff on list are? From general-return-3304-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:07:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F383B3E9D for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18043 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:07:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17980 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17964 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:07:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:07:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:07:50 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.66]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p42K7GE3026130; Mon, 2 May 2011 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304366837; bh=XKd0OT5gZEohdElsaM5iRFORVVSpRM2/KWpNUjoAHPk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=HTrU3fxc6SMVeFzcQUhUAtaP/xRtpRzu5qdSSz+SZ+bnQgdGVzztd/KKT45IQDpuc 6H34XvFdN/UgYdBShxKyasDsh93RZ3fhWpAG5TKx5u9webGF9W0w6FLKQmNMWSmJ4q 2YADKg8E2wmhxNHpDWTsoe4ceI3QyyhxhTKeGYgc= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-dev@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-9--357877675 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:07:16 -0700 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-9--357877675 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug, On May 2, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a > community process. A massive patch set was committed en-masse with no > public discussion before or after about its specific composition. Lets review: # You proposed to release off the Yahoo security patchset first in April, 2010: http://s.apache.org/5Gv # I started this discussion again in Jan, 2011: http://s.apache.org/uf # We went through several iterations: - I first committed a jumbo patch upon which some reservations were expressed. - Owen went ahead and broke them up to commit individual patches to incorporate the provided feedback. # Roy clearly clarified the way forward: http://s.apache.org/tD4 (which Owen has since incorporatedk by breaking into individual patches). Your current stance given the history, is surprising, to say the least... we have already discussed this. It is clear that the community (including downstream Apache projects like Pig, Hive and HCatalog) will substantially benefit from an Apache release of this improved codebase. thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-9--357877675-- From general-return-3305-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:40:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 929C63DCA for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57130 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:40:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57076 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:40:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57068 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:40:48 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:40:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:40:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:40:47 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 01:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > # Roy clearly clarified the way forward: http://s.apache.org/tD4 (which > Owen has since incorporated by breaking into individual patches). Roy suggested a three ways forward and possible outcomes: Roy Fielding wrote: > a) break the changes down into a sequence of patches, create jira > issues for each one (or append to the existing issue), and then > provide the group with a list of the issue links so that people > can quickly +1 each one. When it seems worthwhile to you, create > a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and commit > each patch to it until the branch is identical to (or, in your own > opinion, better than) the source code that you have tested locally. > Then RM a tarball and start a release vote. Since all of this is > being done in jira and svn, others can help you do all but the > first part (breaking down the big patch). > > or > > b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn > and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch > source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then > RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. > Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if > you don't have time. > > or > > c) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn > and apply one big ugly patch to it. Then RM a tarball based > on that branch and ask for a release vote. > > You will note that none of the above requires a discussion on this > list prior to the release vote, though (a) would likely result in > more +1s than (b), and (b) would likely receive more +1s than (c). > Regardless, the release vote is a lazy majority decision. > > [ ... ] > > When the release vote happens, encourage folks to test and +1 > the release. If it passes, woohoo! If not, then listen to the > reasons given by the other PMC members and see if you can make > enough changes to the release to get those extra +1s. I believe that Owen chose (b). We're now at the release vote and I am a PMC member giving reasons for my vote. Also note that, on the common-dev thread, Eli & Tom have both noted a number of inconsistencies between this set of patches and trunk, 0.22 and even prior 0.20 branches and releases. In addition to the lack of community involvement in patch selection, these issues concern me. I cannot in good conscience vote for this release as a community product. Doug From general-return-3306-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:51:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F82C3397 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67126 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:51:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67066 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67057 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:51:08 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:51:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:51:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF193D.6060306@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:51:09 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Eric Baldeschwieler Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 01:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > As previously discussed, all parties are welcome to champion > altenative releases from Apache if they want to invest in making > Apache Hadoop better. I do not believe that different organizations should release their own versions of Hadoop posing as Apache releases. If folks wish to release their own versions, then they should call them something else and release them themselves. The Apache Hadoop project should create releases collaboratively, through an open process. The standard means is to start a branch from trunk or a prior release and propose patches to that branch, one-by-one. This candidate diverged sufficiently from this pattern that, for me, it doesn't qualify as a community release. Cheers, Doug From general-return-3307-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:00:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E417438AB for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84763 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:00:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84546 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:00:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84538 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:00:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:00:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.83.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of james@tynt.com) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:00:12 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so4685089pve.35 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 13:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.164 with SMTP id t4mr9190677pbt.167.1304369990793; Mon, 02 May 2011 13:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.9] (S01060016cbc5f8b4.cg.shawcable.net [174.0.46.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m1sm1366120pbb.47.2011.05.02.13.59.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 May 2011 13:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: James Seigel In-Reply-To: <4DBF193D.6060306@apache.org> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:59:48 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF193D.6060306@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello! I guess I am concerned as a user of hadoop that the only way to get an = =93endorsed=94 up-to-date version of hadoop one has to abandon the = community and =93trust=94 a commercial release with its special sauce. I am just hoping that the community can put together a nice stable = up-to-date patched version. That=92d be nice. It probably won=92t = change my commercial deploy, but it would give me something to compare = with :) Just my $0.02 (CND) Cheers James. On 2011-05-02, at 2:51 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/02/2011 01:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> As previously discussed, all parties are welcome to champion >> altenative releases from Apache if they want to invest in making >> Apache Hadoop better. >=20 > I do not believe that different organizations should release their own > versions of Hadoop posing as Apache releases. If folks wish to = release > their own versions, then they should call them something else and > release them themselves. The Apache Hadoop project should create > releases collaboratively, through an open process. The standard means > is to start a branch from trunk or a prior release and propose patches > to that branch, one-by-one. This candidate diverged sufficiently from > this pattern that, for me, it doesn't qualify as a community release. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Doug From general-return-3308-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:02:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 998B131BE for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91366 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91243 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:02:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91227 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:02:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:02:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:02:04 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so2742565eya.35 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.15.9 with SMTP id e9mr3337525eee.74.1304370104065; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.127.15 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:01:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> <38AE939A-0717-4220-A6F0-6093FF852060@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:01:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Eric, I don't have any objections to a release from branch-0.20-security-203. However when I examined the specific patch set I noticed the are important implications with respect to compatibility (of for 0.20.2 and 0.22), a question about project model (eg not reviewing patches on jira before committing them, not having patches go through trunk, etc), and some open questions for users (eg is this the next dot release of the stable branch?). I agree this is a valuable artifact, but that doesn't mean it's OK to ignore compatibility concerns, etc. I've listed specifics questions/comments here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201105.mbox/%3CB= ANLkTinZ=3Dxb6kJ5PTeLN5KKD9b-cwaM0OQ@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks, Eli On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This strikes me as a bit odd. I think we have already discussed this at l= ength and agreed that a release could proceed. > > Since then, Arun and Owen have worked actively to incorporated community = feedback into this release. > > All parties making Hadoop releases other then Apache have already incorpo= rated most of the patches in this release into their products, including do= ug's organization. I don't see how Hadoop's users benefit from Apache not i= ncorporating them into an Apache release. > > As previously discussed, all parties are welcome to champion altenative r= eleases from Apache if they want to invest in making Apache Hadoop better. > > Thanks!! > > E14 > > --- > E14 - typing on glass > > On May 2, 2011, at 12:16 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > >> moving this thread to general@ >> >> On May 3, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> >>>> Should we release >>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc0/? >>> >>> The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a >>> community process. =A0A massive patch set was committed en-masse with n= o >>> public discussion before or after about its specific composition. >> >> guys... >> 1. do we agree this is an issue >> 2. if it is, how we do get the communication & discussion on list? >> >> what do people think are the major issues that are stopping people talki= ng about stuff on list are? > From general-return-3309-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:06:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14B283C92 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98276 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:05:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98233 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:05:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98225 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:05:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:05:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:05:54 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.66]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p42L5GLF021901 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:05:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304370316; bh=s2N5vivpa4mAwb5TRD0MWzPuXtANECqOs+0R1tNR8Aw=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=hy3tWzS/rTfeILuqS1DtKN9WzkX5pi3DXwNn9/NW9G2qykHyWQU34W6MjTdYDN61F cShlgexeWCTCULCLFrma6HSIz2BpDVyiy7LL8+Ej9bL856SYvkMCAzvv5K/YxHFM+v aOT83PpQeWMIH8IzpXOziN34sr2jYqH66wBnTYjM= Message-Id: <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-11--354398301 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:05:16 -0700 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-11--354398301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug, On May 2, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Also note that, on the common-dev thread, Eli & Tom have both noted a > number of inconsistencies between this set of patches and trunk, 0.22 > and even prior 0.20 branches and releases. In addition to the lack of > community involvement in patch selection, these issues concern me. > > I cannot in good conscience vote for this release as a community > product. As I noted before you were the first one to propose this release off Yahoo security patch-set in April, 2010: http://s.apache.org/5Gv What has changed since? Clearly, the same situation exists today. Also, please note that of the ~450 commits in the branch, only 30 odd jiras are yet to be committed to trunk: http://s.apache.org/7Pe. So it's incorrect to state 'lack of community involvement'. Assuming the technical inconsistencies are sorted out, are you willing to withdraw you objection? thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-11--354398301-- From general-return-3310-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:21:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5047C3347 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16667 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:21:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16619 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:21:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16611 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:21:03 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:21:04 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 02:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > As I noted before you were the first one to propose this release off > Yahoo security patch-set in April, 2010: > http://s.apache.org/5Gv > > What has changed since? Clearly, the same situation exists today. I have absolutely no objection in principle to an Apache 0.20 release including security. I object to the fact that this patchset started from an arbitrary point and unilaterally applied a large set of patches that are not well correlated with Jira, trunk or other 0.20 branches. > Also, please note that of the ~450 commits in the branch, only 30 odd > jiras are yet to be committed to trunk: > http://s.apache.org/7Pe. So it's incorrect to state 'lack of community > involvement'. This should be easily discoverable from Jira: issues should use the "fix-for" field to indicate which branches they've been merged to. This standard practice has not been observed for over 400 patches included in this release candidate. > Assuming the technical inconsistencies are sorted out, are you willing > to withdraw you objection? These are not just technical concerns. How I vote on any future release candidate will in part depend on how the community is involved in its production. Thanks, Doug From general-return-3311-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:34:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E22F03A44 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35339 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:34:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35280 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:34:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35272 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:34:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:34:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:34:00 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.66]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p42LXKdo078559 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304372001; bh=g34q1YNv+Ilq0DjVz54fpehc6d/aYVjjosgSvNhwXhY=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=H7mpmPkwg61wOygpqYgHNwFG0Fz65S5qBV5wUsu70oBykDBx1C4reUWfQoxBtFWEi Wj5pUNr7S4/aVb/RPBkTGM4VvAcCoIUBR8YmkXJ+lzXnX6WMM6Uk2YzQA3xiDqZHeW lLn2wlazsPc0NsBN/+LmWQnSIy5bjEkkm1KTXA6A= Message-Id: <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:33:20 -0700 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On May 2, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/02/2011 02:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> As I noted before you were the first one to propose this release off >> Yahoo security patch-set in April, 2010: >> http://s.apache.org/5Gv >> >> What has changed since? Clearly, the same situation exists today. > > I have absolutely no objection in principle to an Apache 0.20 release > including security. I object to the fact that this patchset started > from an arbitrary point and unilaterally applied a large set of > patches > that are not well correlated with Jira, trunk or other 0.20 branches. Completely untrue. This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1. We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last stable release: 0.20.2. > >> Also, please note that of the ~450 commits in the branch, only 30 odd >> jiras are yet to be committed to trunk: >> http://s.apache.org/7Pe. So it's incorrect to state 'lack of >> community >> involvement'. > > This should be easily discoverable from Jira: issues should use the > "fix-for" field to indicate which branches they've been merged to. > This > standard practice has not been observed for over 400 patches > included in > this release candidate. > This seems like parliamentary stalling procedures... sure they don't have 'fix-for' fields but they've been verified to be true from external committers: http://s.apache.org/yX Are you simply asking for someone to go through the 450 odd jiras and set 'fix-for' fields? >> Assuming the technical inconsistencies are sorted out, are you >> willing >> to withdraw you objection? > > These are not just technical concerns. How I vote on any future > release > candidate will in part depend on how the community is involved in its > production. > I understand they aren't technical concerns. I asked if you were willing to withdraw your objection if the technical concerns are satisfied. I think you answered my question - you will not withdraw your objection even if it's a technical issue. thanks, Arun From general-return-3312-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:48:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CD9A3238 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49550 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:48:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49466 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49458 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:48:36 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:48:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:48:36 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF26B5.70409@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:48:37 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On May 2, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> I have absolutely no objection in principle to an Apache 0.20 release >> including security. I object to the fact that this patchset started >> from an arbitrary point and unilaterally applied a large set of patches >> that are not well correlated with Jira, trunk or other 0.20 branches. > > Completely untrue. 'Completely'? Really? Not a true bit in there? Wow! > This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1. 0.20.1 isn't a branch, it's a tag. The 0.20 branch includes many post-0.20.1 patches that are not in this candidate. Releases in a series normally share a branch. > I asked if you were willing to withdraw your objection if the technical > concerns are satisfied. I think you answered my question - you will not > withdraw your objection even if it's a technical issue. That is not what I said. If this release does not get enough votes then perhaps another 0.20.203 release candidate will be proposed. Its process and contents will be different and I will judge it on the basis of those when I vote. Doug From general-return-3313-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:50:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCD7D32EA for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52452 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:50:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52403 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:50:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52395 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:50:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:50:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:50:02 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4065680qwj.35 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:49:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=YJmsiepD8ZZXQTKYBChWOesLAtHL0eOs0GLByegTSvs=; b=Yd+V1DEwruYjBsWbBKm/YIY4gGzy0W36JFgPGE3MuuCIvynWijyjz9h0STIv5V2gaN w5j4Uwl/D6qajMc4Mu1Xo1w8t0YUaXr9tRaDZj2wXtD4f3xdJhA5B3xQ1OepAEypkwf+ hbP0brDJPjVbxg9/nPcPMria+U8GDur3z/x0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PnQElhCjFsMfEEMo+Cw6N3CgjIO5SyNJHFmyqXAzCUV5xYUVVB6Y8Y9fobB30gcy1m wird3lxLZW9fVDT2pO1JOwxcNxCwkga2Y/265YWpaCNKqzq9Y5Lz1JUBfrVLK17+YnmD 34p4fLoeb8fXk4pq0gEuVEbbBZKugQEv6J0ms= Received: by 10.229.17.7 with SMTP id q7mr6536903qca.145.1304372980331; Mon, 02 May 2011 14:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.214] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm4262620qcs.23.2011.05.02.14.49.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 May 2011 14:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 07:49:33 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 3, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 > This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1. >=20 > We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last = stable release: 0.20.2. so are you intending to make it a superset for 203? or for a future = release?= From general-return-3314-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:55:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06CC534A3 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62760 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:55:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62712 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:55:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62704 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:55:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:55:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF284E.2020509@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:55:26 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last > stable release: 0.20.2. Great! Who's 'we'? Do you want any help with this? Doug From general-return-3315-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:06:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 324F53A97 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73552 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73507 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73497 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:06:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.228] (HELO nm7-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:06:04 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.196] by nm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:05:43 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.147] by tm9.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:05:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:05:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 996854.96846.bm@omp1030.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 50690 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2011 22:05:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304373942; bh=H2wFz++YCasumGdGuctn/+FFObYCBF9I6NlwNa+PiUA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=exGUzj2VjKn1PwLaSuWNI+KEcmhw21G9xkBIcbP+oKRbkd0ixuLeRlSpwLFy5u1v/gsbz3H4y5rqoSvQ29hJLHw/B8v8vg8p1V1M9nPz5/+jFS1NmLciUPncxAYyhcRcd7+Ja0eMw8UTE/VnNg26XBlZEJwN2dG0c55swbefosI= Message-ID: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: zoMFFgMVM1nU6PsguNPn53nXkXa8Ec.9Y4RDv3lPfPTqHgb bKaRgsP82B1Hy_b3Af153DDdhwgpirx1ToV02moS0Cd9hIuc0DjcJCJD9zeD DMZ2CT8ygI8LtJwIuJ6xJ.sM6Q5ukzD3hg4nhubzxQIRbA5dVsvijB1qpMfU ubzcFC0wedyHlYFQNgrywIh6_EByYmQAwjvhyEb5oW0h8fZafu20b8jzzYqG sDQ23l.w5BNiqMr9_mUndmceUX96ZN5FgSboSr9nn5ymUSKNy3_VWQ8RK56z rVcpYEfXbBMLmRWYK21b11Twix4kemOodBqF50CDbXiOo.unQ1yKk6HzvCov CLKGlcN7pGPf9cgwBb7V_CLuzalEEUREXXAq9jgY91n7DtXdZqAycz2rtXm5 0D_b2EUdEbL_B_w-- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:05:42 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:05:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Most points in this thread are valid, having to do with the process of how = the contribution was assembled; and specific technical aspects of it, e.g. = JIRAs missing from branch 0.20.203 relative to branch 0.20. However,=0A=0A>= From: Doug Cutting =0A> > Assuming the technical incon= sistencies are sorted out,=0A> > are you willing to withdraw you objection?= =0A> =0A> These are not just technical concerns.=A0 How I vote on any futur= e=0A> release candidate will in part depend on how the community is=0A> inv= olved in its production.=0A=0AWhat strikes me, as an observer to this discu= ssion, is that here "community" does not seem equated with Yahoo by implica= tion. Perhaps I misread. Nevertheless, Yahoo retains a good percentage of a= ctive Core developers with standing as both committers and high scale users= , and these people produced the contribution that is branch 0.20.203, and t= herefore by definition "the community" was entirely involved in its product= ion.=0A=0AYahoo should be commended for advancing the state of branch 0.20 = with an obvious commitment to donating the results to Apache. As a communit= y we are lucky to have a strong contributor. Their security enhancements al= low us and many others the option of strong authentication and user isolati= on for multitenant deployments. =0A=0AA commercial vendor's product already= incorporates Yahoo's donated security enhancements. It would be regrettabl= e if nontechnical factors ultimately prevents Apache from incorporating the= value of these contributions into an official release.=0A=0ASome technical= concerns seem reasonable. Regarding that:=0A=0A> From: Stack =0A> How hard would it be to get the patches Tom lists below into=0A> = branch-0.20-security-203?=A0 I'd think it'd be an easier=0A> sell if it wer= e a superset of all in 0.20, especially since it=0A> bears its name.=0A=0AT= his suggestion makes a lot of sense. In addition, filing JIRAs for and post= ing the diffs of the remaining differences could help the process as well, = and would be good faith actions of an active contributor.=0A=0ABest regards= ,=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0AProblems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitti= ng back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A From general-return-3316-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:15:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E2FE3C78 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84151 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:15:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84091 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:15:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84083 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:15:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:15:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.215] (HELO nm18.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:14:55 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm18.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:14:34 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.130] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:14:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2011 22:14:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 16509.80734.bm@omp1013.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 55300 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2011 22:14:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304374473; bh=NaG3Lb8NwZp9xieW92C6RuQU/SMJurW++OgiY053KwY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uBJsPR5+EueeYRki4FNOF7Vkw8Ajz4g4zfD7fAnKFgyMzEvl4WFwEKAdbwz9eMNHXiDxDcTlr37B06l5mLri1IGwpL5et3UhMAyzX+yOf2gtzdg12rI3u9qchI7GWSUpOsk0H2E3mjFh6pPHmReWKlWiRLQP0J9JZE0iOa94UKo= Message-ID: <878851.54111.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: TXl6rjAVM1nxTn_cPing3fu5fis015qy1bk865sZQ.fwHxU 4MBGBWuDlf.Ky.0IztTfd98J__gItnHkLPKbTRZlDXf9ZxLqIFOLEmmYzaLX _KIBF9vvTTe9EGjUKxlmXevYLtjTVxs2Y2k1nhXwJTMxQj6ElX7VUZqsXg8I v1ti1u5JWNYFBYBjomwIGFFKk_K06sn996ThHJ7.IrylcJCmj4ZrxVKDeU0i j.4ixso0GxolJ4ridfK9XsuE.EZo0qWgdekMmtoomIVyK4cHOi72JrgjF7g6 SnNw.hEkw_SZsrTE3cStmoRSulEgJYkUs62dQCFl5LPQJOVUZD1R1YNI9FA1 ySItxP0OFTFFJt2PMNCcoDMvECm4kUzszzzyPc.gP0vykPh5u1Rb5F8jo7Wn 4UZRI9Tgf2N_pRQ-- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:14:33 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would like to make one minor but important clarification:=0A=0AFrom:=0A= =0A> It would be regrettable if=0A> nontechnical factors ultimately prevent= s Apache from=0A> incorporating the value of these contributions into an=0A= > official release.=0A=0ATo:=0A=0AIt would be regrettable if nontechnical f= actors ultimately prevents Apache from incorporating the value of these co= ntributions into an official release OF 0.20. There are some not yet ready = to take the leap to 0.22; who do not consider it proven. =0A=0ASo in this = regard I do not wish to minimize concerns about distracting from the succes= s of 0.22 or later releases. =0A=0A> From: Andrew Purtell =0A> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0=0A> To: gener= al@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 3:05 PM=0A=0A> Most poi= nts in this thread are valid,=0A> having to do with the process of how the = contribution was=0A> assembled; and specific technical aspects of it, e.g. = JIRAs=0A> missing from branch 0.20.203 relative to branch 0.20.=0A> However= ,=0A> =0A> > > From: Doug Cutting =0A> > > Assuming the= technical inconsistencies are sorted=0A> > > out, are you willing to withd= raw you objection?=0A> > =0A> > These are not just technical concerns.=A0 H= ow I vote on=0A> > any future release candidate will in part depend on how= =0A> > the community is involved in its production.=0A> =0A> What strikes m= e, as an observer to this discussion, is that=0A> here "community" does not= seem equated with Yahoo by=0A> implication. Perhaps I misread. Nevertheles= s, Yahoo retains=0A> a good percentage of active Core developers with stand= ing as=0A> both committers and high scale users, and these people=0A> produ= ced the contribution that is branch 0.20.203, and=0A> therefore by definiti= on "the community" was entirely=0A> involved in its production.=0A> =0A> Ya= hoo should be commended for advancing the state of branch=0A> 0.20 with an = obvious commitment to donating the results to=0A> Apache. As a community we= are lucky to have a strong=0A> contributor. Their security enhancements al= low us and many=0A> others the option of strong authentication and user=0A>= isolation for multitenant deployments. =0A> =0A> A commercial vendor's pro= duct already incorporates Yahoo's=0A> donated security enhancements. It wou= ld be regrettable if=0A> nontechnical factors ultimately prevents Apache fr= om=0A> incorporating the value of these contributions into an=0A> official = release.=0A> =0A> Some technical concerns seem reasonable. Regarding that:= =0A> =0A> > From: Stack =0A> > How hard would it be to ge= t the patches Tom lists=0A> below into=0A> > branch-0.20-security-203?=A0 I= 'd think it'd be an=0A> easier=0A> > sell if it were a superset of all in 0= .20, especially=0A> since it=0A> > bears its name.=0A> =0A> This suggestion= makes a lot of sense. In addition, filing=0A> JIRAs for and posting the di= ffs of the remaining differences=0A> could help the process as well, and wo= uld be good faith=0A> actions of an active contributor.=0A> =0A> Best regar= ds,=0A> =0A> =A0 =A0 - Andy=0A> =0A> Problems worthy of attack prove their = worth by hitting=0A> back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A> =0A> From general-return-3317-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:16:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E36D53F6C for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87102 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:16:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87048 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87036 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:16:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:16:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:16:00 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.66]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p42MFDIt040212; Mon, 2 May 2011 15:15:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304374513; bh=gJsgRgrT2xC9idfARiOmnVDA0l2YgfFPZj1x/TfnJNM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=rTi6M449Dmp431lNxanza4LfptTXiXRRD0bc5OiloAh++KsPyePOLzmIir19noEAY GUGaIwFSt4CPKDra/FLFC5eBgO4voLH4S+zcNhpP2KDQOMOxME+a0xMquKLXjzLXNN wTSSa8pk0h+H9wf0vILA3NAsjWTxg+/UKjaxam+o= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "apurtell@apache.org" In-Reply-To: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:15:13 -0700 References: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On May 2, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Some technical concerns seem reasonable. Regarding that: > >> From: Stack >> How hard would it be to get the patches Tom lists below into >> branch-0.20-security-203? I'd think it'd be an easier >> sell if it were a superset of all in 0.20, especially since it >> bears its name. > > This suggestion makes a lot of sense. In addition, filing JIRAs for > and posting the diffs of the remaining differences could help the > process as well, and would be good faith actions of an active > contributor. > Agreed, I'm starting the effort to ensure the differences from 0.20.2 are resolved. From my msg on this thread to common-dev@: > # Remaining for 0.20.203 > * HADOOP-5611 > * HADOOP-5612 > * HADOOP-5623 > * HDFS-596 > * HDFS-723 > * HDFS-732 > * HDFS-579 > * MAPREDUCE-1070 > * HADOOP-6315 > * MAPREDUCE-1163 Suresh has kindly agreed to help me, appreciate help from others - particularly on the 0.20.3 changes. thanks, Arun From general-return-3318-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:19:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8B883E87 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90036 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:19:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89979 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89971 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:19:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:19:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:19:23 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so2768829eya.35 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:19:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.51.20 with SMTP id a20mr3509458eec.213.1304374743400; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.127.15 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "apurtell@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On May 2, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > >> Some technical concerns seem reasonable. Regarding that: >> >>> From: Stack >>> How hard would it be to get the patches Tom lists below into >>> branch-0.20-security-203? =A0I'd think it'd be an easier >>> sell if it were a superset of all in 0.20, especially since it >>> bears its name. >> >> This suggestion makes a lot of sense. In addition, filing JIRAs for and >> posting the diffs of the remaining differences could help the process as >> well, and would be good faith actions of an active contributor. >> > > Agreed, I'm starting the effort to ensure the differences from 0.20.2 are > resolved. > > From my msg on this thread to common-dev@: > >> # Remaining for 0.20.203 >> =A0* HADOOP-5611 >> =A0* HADOOP-5612 >> =A0* HADOOP-5623 >> =A0* HDFS-596 >> =A0* HDFS-723 >> =A0* HDFS-732 >> =A0* HDFS-579 >> =A0* MAPREDUCE-1070 >> =A0* HADOOP-6315 >> =A0* MAPREDUCE-1163 > > Suresh has kindly agreed to help me, appreciate help from others - > particularly on the 0.20.3 changes. > I'd like to help. Perhaps let's coordinate in a separate thread? Thanks, Eli From general-return-3319-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:20:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 340A231AF for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93091 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93042 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93034 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:20:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:20:36 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-66.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.66]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p42MJbNk041390 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304374784; bh=kDX4B2P5ycqNZPOPQ5QoZwZUMlFM2QVKo875XSXGIM8=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=swpg6cAzBG3eOq5L6aP1o0y6Twg3QYBQSjfY0wDhF2Y3pYgmcAW3fwcdb+7GSPZ5D GxMIifAMkkZEBwbxE578ViYayNod82vniCsR76Bi/Ip6lNVUnJkV/Ft2B34bSeb+eO ulggMvqoC6Jagl578dAv5fkIdPqWqE50dIEus2dY= Message-Id: <410F98B8-6BFE-459A-BD75-46B5131F3F19@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:19:36 -0700 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On May 2, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> >> This patchset started from 0.20.1 has is complete superset of 0.20.1. >> >> We will work towards ensuring it is a complete superset of the last >> stable release: 0.20.2. > > so are you intending to make it a superset for 203? or for a future > release? For 0.20.203, it behooves us to incorporate feedback for that. Arun From general-return-3320-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:25:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547803243 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1826 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1781 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1773 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:25:48 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:25:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:25:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4DBF2F6D.8010709@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:25:49 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <857369.41092.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 03:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > What strikes me, as an observer to this discussion, is that here > "community" does not seem equated with Yahoo by implication. Perhaps > I misread. Nevertheless, Yahoo retains a good percentage of active > Core developers with standing as both committers and high scale > users, and these people produced the contribution that is branch > 0.20.203, and therefore by definition "the community" was entirely > involved in its production. Whether or not a subset of contributors acts as the community depends on whether others outside that subset have a reasonable opportunity to become involved. Until this release vote was called it wasn't entirely clear to all what was happening with these branches. Wider community involvement is now starting as folks work to rationalize this 450-issue patch with respect to past and future releases, Jira, etc. > Yahoo should be commended for advancing the state of branch 0.20 with > an obvious commitment to donating the results to Apache. As a > community we are lucky to have a strong contributor. Their security > enhancements allow us and many others the option of strong > authentication and user isolation for multitenant deployments. +1 > A commercial vendor's product already incorporates Yahoo's donated > security enhancements. It would be regrettable if nontechnical > factors ultimately prevents Apache from incorporating the value of > these contributions into an official release. +1 Cheers, Doug From general-return-3321-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:32:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AE443C26 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13497 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:31:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13441 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:31:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13433 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:31:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:31:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of jtcornelius@pentaho.com does not designate 98.129.35.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [98.129.35.4] (HELO server505.appriver.com) (98.129.35.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:31:51 +0000 X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 5/2/2011 5:31:31 PM X-Policy: GLOBAL - UNKNOWN X-Primary: jtcornelius@pentaho.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note-SnifferID: 0 X-Note: TCH-CT/SI:0-90/SG:2 5/2/2011 5:30:31 PM X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 98.129.23.14, Ugly c=1 p=-0.554607 Source Normal X-Signature-Violations: 0-0-0-4117-c X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.14 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: smtp.exg5.exghost.com X-Note-WHTLIST: jtcornelius@pentaho.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G195 G196 G197 G198 G202 G203 G302 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: VALID X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [98.129.23.14] (HELO smtp.exg5.exghost.com) by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.13) with ESMTPS id 139716802 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:31:31 -0500 Received: from MBX15.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.20]) by ht01.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.14]) with mapi; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:31:29 -0500 From: Jake Cornelius To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:31:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Index: AcwJF+rv/4nhhKVGTcao2zDzzg+WuQAAMMkP Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Doug Cutting wrote: On 05/02/2011 03:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > What strikes me, as an observer to this discussion, is that here > "community" does not seem equated with Yahoo by implication. Perhaps > I misread. Nevertheless, Yahoo retains a good percentage of active > Core developers with standing as both committers and high scale > users, and these people produced the contribution that is branch > 0.20.203, and therefore by definition "the community" was entirely > involved in its production. Whether or not a subset of contributors acts as the community depends on whether others outside that subset have a reasonable opportunity to become involved. Until this release vote was called it wasn't entirely clear to all what was happening with these branches. Wider community involvement is now starting as folks work to rationalize this 450-issue patch with respect to past and future releases, Jira, etc. > Yahoo should be commended for advancing the state of branch 0.20 with > an obvious commitment to donating the results to Apache. As a > community we are lucky to have a strong contributor. Their security > enhancements allow us and many others the option of strong > authentication and user isolation for multitenant deployments. +1 > A commercial vendor's product already incorporates Yahoo's donated > security enhancements. It would be regrettable if nontechnical > factors ultimately prevents Apache from incorporating the value of > these contributions into an official release. +1 Cheers, Doug From general-return-3322-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 00:41:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A474FC8 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 00:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69815 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 00:41:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69749 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 00:41:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69739 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 00:41:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 00:41:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.74] (HELO homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 00:41:48 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33671F007C for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:41:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=yyGfXDdf+NOt+aJ2QyZcJ6gcHijxeOX2nWc6K3fPiuBpGxUGRc43 O4+3FNQycn83m5N6Urt1TkJ0MvTu+cMGxmp24eOmsM7RaAytaMnuGuDpQ2I3VQEH ZKWOFJr2JLakpJDEOZZUl7lmMCpKnQJmM9YITSfItQkQVWt81I34ifo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=7XLVJ9bIOqq5KKw3UI3KkSwG7P8=; b=6gfgZWA/OrYyh9AEbzBXbbl/EhDb 96lHt3XEZkrey/b1WtGzV1r1tHrWEvUKJJl+bLS1lZzhv6KlhMaNYk8gCuOGJU3F IHl/m6221/wo3L25e+njEf0yadjQBSJ9fYEhhf2V1RO83e+wH0tM7x+YgglpAs7R d79/NBpqyecXu18= Received: from [10.134.89.86] (unknown [75.103.10.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92EAD1F0078 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:41:26 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On May 2, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > moving this thread to general@ >=20 > On May 3, 2011, at 3:58 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >=20 >>> Should we release >>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc0/? >>=20 >> The patch selection process for this branch did not appear to be a >> community process. A massive patch set was committed en-masse with = no >> public discussion before or after about its specific composition. >=20 > guys... > 1. do we agree this is an issue Of course it is an issue. Anyone can make it an issue -- no agreement is necessary. > 2. if it is, how we do get the communication & discussion on list? By communicating and discussing on list. Like, for example, by proposing a release vote and people objecting to it, followed by a polite collaboration on ways to reduce objections if that is needed to get a release out the door. > what do people think are the major issues that are stopping people = talking about stuff on list are? The fact that people can vote on individual issues via jira, which means that there is effectively no discussion of the product as a whole on list. I am constantly amazed at how quiet it is in this project, at least until I remember that most of the work is done exclusively via jira, unlike any of my other followed projects that use jira. I'd suggest that the right place to hold any discussion is on the dev list, but I am not on that list because it receives way too many automated notifications. Maybe it would help discussion on dev if notices were sent elsewhere and only discussions were held on dev. By all means, produce a tarball and let the entire PMC vote on it as the next release. My personal preference is to not allow anything that deviates from the major.minor.patch release numbering that most software projects follow, but I don't have a vote here. It is perfectly reasonable for Doug (or anyone else) to vote on a release based on a lack of version history, adequate description of the sweet meats, or anything else that others might consider non-technical. This is a release vote! It does not require consensus. It requires minimal review (usually meaning three +1s) and a majority opinion of those on the PMC who choose to review the proposed release and vote. ....Roy= From general-return-3323-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 04:12:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65B2B2348 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 04:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20861 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 04:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20795 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 04:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20787 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 04:12:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 04:12:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 04:12:03 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=muTyo1e1pOWtEvi469o/cGtWOL3LA83CWzhereOlyc92kC6KZV6UgIcQ X7jdsfAMqIUZ5IIZyQNjGvG+NToq0YWSK+rYOgckqKbtlhOZ5u3eA8f30 WiOehcyIOnxsdac; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304395923; x=1335931923; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=efIJXWJC86muvedZp1tCJJmTsuP1I7ev8bYXOwyYSyk=; b=OgryO/UTZ3Fprz1PIfoOgopACXw9n03ODHikYaQ1GehxKudJpATISZBA KKT3cGZ5VHzC0RTHJn9CrSgqfB7u6pwqL4vjRn0byjKTehpzFXwCIEPMl 5EYoBdrkp/u7U0f; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,307,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22776366" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:15:04 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Topic: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Index: AQHMBsMYhWGNisphykmPrKzgX+v3mZR6TOOAgAAVnwCAAFr7AP//xWQA Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 04:15:03 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 >It is perfectly reasonable for Doug (or anyone else) to vote >on a release based on a lack of version history, adequate >description of the sweet meats, or anything else that others >might consider non-technical. This is a release vote! >It does not require consensus. It requires minimal review >(usually meaning three +1s) and a majority opinion of those >on the PMC who choose to review the proposed release and vote. Roy, Thanks for reminding everyone that a release does not require consensus. Regarding this release, I think anyone who runs a multi-tenant Hadoop cluster will appreciate the user-limits feature that goes a long way to ensure that an errant job does not take the entire cluster down. Your operations and support people will thank you for deploying this release. Recently I was discussing with operations folks at a company that operates a Hadoop cluster based on a commercial distribution of Hadoop, and they were excited to hear that they will have a way of making sure that their cluster will not be taken down by an errant user/job, because that's one big fear that keeps them awake. FWIW, I am +1 for this release. Arun, can you include a document that gives more details about what the limits are, and how to modify your jobs to stay below these limits (I know it is a cut-paste for you :-)? - milind From general-return-3324-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 05:18:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16512DCD for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82435 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81881 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81873 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 05:18:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:18:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:18:15 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so7415001wwi.29 for ; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:17:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0xW0cDCRNQjyjH/8tQF3emvLZYsfnWw4ktko+UbMHAs=; b=kCGRq41vNFoVKWaYrPpXeedhxDZ8MtCL0kNNK7JngyKCNhltjapeiY0ePEqgpZR1eB wJ8j5sPnUlCvzTOWwl8AFzTZQhqpqh025OXiqZt2GjqvMEachbvXe+3Wxg82DXwp7L1b l60ZZMX+2vVNvFJXU+kWw6h61jY6BsVCjnegY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Qg54Zi1pJDahzPwukHkfvki4W8Cm+UgadsnvIL2mt5csCFZrABPKfzt6oZ7tgJcbwJ pJYxOsLepJOFmie8OSDfqb7Gpahvx6VsOXO3MTadeIe4EZ4dgknZpyptbQ4JzbDi7zH9 OYkIDrb7A5OpM8XeatFLc+Kp6cqwcH+T4CCiM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.5.205 with SMTP id 13mr3430827wbw.31.1304399874099; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.28.220 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:17:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:54 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: questions about hadoop map reduce and compute intensive related applications From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cf7da240ab904a2584385 --0015175cf7da240ab904a2584385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanks gmackey, There is an project out of Sandia National Lab that puts MR and MPI together > in a library if you're interested --> > http://www.sandia.gov/~sjplimp/mapreduce.html That is a implementation of MR using MPI. I saw that as well but haven't tried it out. I am actually looking at programming model level integration. You know, for some applications, you can take advantage of high through put from MR and message passing from MPI. -Elton On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:55 AM, wrote: > > Integrating MPI with map-reduce is currently difficult and/or very ugly, >> however. Not impossible and there are hackish ways to do the job, but they >> are hacks. >> > > There is an project out of Sandia National Lab that puts MR and MPI > together in a library if you're interested --> > http://www.sandia.gov/~sjplimp/mapreduce.html > > The project isn't mature yet, and I haven't actually used it myself. > > -- > -- > Grant Mackey > PhD student Computer Engineering > University of Central Florida > --0015175cf7da240ab904a2584385-- From general-return-3325-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 08:40:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B97F72E9F for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 08:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88330 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 08:40:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87324 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 08:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87309 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 08:40:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 08:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 08:40:13 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so3058437gxk.35 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 01:39:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=elJstl9zVKPMbEb1Gurl2xJyXqh/RHTmq21ZwDsfd7w=; b=ZKwJIsOHYvrjJQDEDSNgEiB//XRfnOmIxTm2smNmPgWMwXKhlEU8SmPu5o2dWWYH/a L4clzGmIXixAKdfEgjtCxtRsw1b9fciGCzNjFm2j9NutV4/0rLD90augh1C17dfJCKM/ SQcUTWwbh/lQcWLOHEveQeBR82pwlN+TycIeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hnu381bxyyw5VKkLa+/jC6zsxS78YVxlgBHXBF9MTxU3Jf0ZDnW882bLHk9qzPIDwk fYWaKJUTTu9cV/OTDs6GWCgCtFu+kki/fl5J3PF0uCyAiVkFPPL+B0K9EdlKzzT2YeWg 5LyEXSjbFOnXL+ECn9/U2uIcurO3GlknoyoB0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.184.199 with SMTP id s47mr1711703yhm.356.1304411992495; Tue, 03 May 2011 01:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.124.12 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 01:39:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 01:39:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f651874174304a25b1534 --20cf303f651874174304a25b1534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think its a good idea to release hadoop-0.20.203. It moves Apache Hadoop a step forward. Looks like the technical difficulties are resolved now with latest Arun's commits. Being a superset of hadoop-0.20.2 it can be considered based on one of the official Apache releases. I don't think there was a lack of discussions on the lists about the issues included in the release candidate. Todd did a thorough review of the entire security branch. Many developers participated in discussions. Agreeing with Stack I wish HBase was considered a primary target for Hadoop support. But it is not realistic to have it in hadoop-0.20.203. I have some experience running a version of this release candidate on a large cluster. It works. I would add a couple of patches, which make it run on Windows for me like HADOOP-7110, HADOOP-7126. But those are not blockers. Thanks, --Konstantin On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > >> > >> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except > >> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are relevant/ > >> necessary, I'll check with Cos. Other than that hadoop-0.20.203 now a > >> superset of hadoop-0.20.2. > >> > > > > Missed adding HADOOP-5759 to that list, I'll check with Amareshwari > before committing. > > > > Arun > > Thanks for doing this so fast Arun. > > --20cf303f651874174304a25b1534-- From general-return-3326-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 14:17:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F2F22B17 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 14:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68012 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 14:17:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67868 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 14:17:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67860 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 14:17:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 14:17:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 14:17:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AB21BA925 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:20 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23o3T6Zuw18m for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F283C1BA91D for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:19 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305037027.87133@8c1EBFxn6gL8cFRwSjsiVA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p43EH7Ax019162 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:17:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC00E63.1000507@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:17:07 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p43EH7Ax019162 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/05/11 01:41, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I am constantly amazed at how > quiet it is in this project, at least until I remember that > most of the work is done exclusively via jira, unlike any of > my other followed projects that use jira. I'd suggest that > the right place to hold any discussion is on the dev list, > but I am not on that list because it receives way too many > automated notifications. Maybe it would help discussion on > dev if notices were sent elsewhere and only discussions were > held on dev. I've seen this before on the Maven lists, where there's mostly a stream of JIRA changes above anything else: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200510.mbox/browser however, they've got no JIRA issues in their list now, which may imply all changes aren't going to the list, or they arent using it so much: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201104.mbox/browser (pause: bisecting their list shows that in 1.mar.06 they forked JIRA to a separate list to hide the details of ongoing work) In some ways it's a means of dealing with a large and fast moving codebase: you subscribe to the issues that matter to you, all the discussions on a specific feature are archived, etc. However, it has some flaws -discouragement of community, you become a group of people working on JIRA issues, rather than on a large integrated project -with work spread across common, hdfs and mapreduce JIRAs and mailing lists, it's hard to keep all the things in your head -it is pretty much a full time job to do so. And I don't know about the others, but I don't have the time. -we need a way of gently moving people from those who use hadoop to those who develop it. To me, every end user is a warm engineering resource we just need to point at a problem that they care about. The scale of the project, its complexity, JIRA change rate and testing difficulties are all barriers to entry -you end up needing a team of people * someone to track all the issues and keep the design in their head * 1+ person to test * 1+ person to code I don't know about others, but I can't do this on my own. The attempt to split up into HDFS+MAPREDUCE was one tactic to deal with this, but it hasn't worked, we just have more mailing lists to track (or in my case, fall behind on). votewise: -I'm favour of shipping an apache release of 20.x that has the patches that Y! and others have added to deal with scale and availability -and which has been tested by them. This will provide an apache release for people to use in production systems -because the official apache releases have lagged the CDH and Y! releases. -I'd like to see all the changes integrated into trunk too, as it doesn't make sense for a patch in this branch not to be in trunk. Steve From general-return-3327-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:02:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 652862FCE for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65000 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:02:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64803 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64795 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:02:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:02:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:02:28 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so131067ewy.35 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 10:02:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr17550eeh.195.1304442127760; Tue, 03 May 2011 10:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 10:02:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 10:02:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think we still need to incorporate the patches currently checked into branch 0.20. For example, Owen identified a major bug (BooleanWritable's comparator is broken) and filed a jira (HADOOP-6928) to put it in branch-0.20, where I reviewed it and checked it in, so this bug would be fixed in the next stable release. However this change is not in branch-0.20-security-203. Unless we put the delta from branch-0.20 into this release, it is missing important bug fixes that will cause it to regress against 20.3 (if it ever is released). I am also nervous about changes like the one identified by HADOOP-7255. It looks like this change caused a significant regression in TestDFSIO throughput. It changes the core Task class, the commit log is a single line, and as far as I can tell it was not discussed or reviewed by anyone in the community. Don't changes like this at least deserve a jira before we release them? Thanks, Eli On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I think its a good idea to release hadoop-0.20.203. It moves Apache Hadoo= p a > step forward. > > Looks like the technical difficulties are resolved now with latest Arun's > commits. > Being a superset of hadoop-0.20.2 it can be considered based on one of th= e > official Apache releases. > I don't think there was a lack of discussions on the lists about the issu= es > included in the release candidate. Todd did a thorough review of the enti= re > security branch. Many developers participated in discussions. > Agreeing with Stack I wish HBase was considered a primary target for Hado= op > support. But it is not realistic to have it in hadoop-0.20.203. > I have some experience running a version of this release candidate on a > large cluster. It works. I would add a couple of patches, which make it r= un > on Windows for me like HADOOP-7110, HADOOP-7126. But those are not blocke= rs. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> On May 3, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except >> >> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are relevant/ >> >> necessary, I'll check with Cos. =A0Other than that hadoop-0.20.203 no= w a >> >> superset of hadoop-0.20.2. >> >> >> > >> > Missed adding HADOOP-5759 to that list, I'll check with Amareshwari >> before committing. >> > >> > Arun >> >> Thanks for doing this so fast Arun. >> >> > From general-return-3328-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 18:19:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5899B2A1F for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5470 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5422 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5414 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 18:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:19:22 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so164937ewy.35 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.120.199 with SMTP id p47mr52631eeh.163.1304446741114; Tue, 03 May 2011 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:19:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Questions about the security branches From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey guys, Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security, then get merged to a particular -2xx branch? Ie to include something in a 2xx release do you merge from trunk -> -security -> security-2xx? Why create a new branch for every new dot release? Ie if the intent that the branch will be dead after release, why not release from a single branch? It's hard to see that each branch is a superset of the previous. Why is there a new 4th component to the version number? Shouldn't we stick with major.minor.revision? Why not use 0.20.100, Arun's original proposal? I noticed a 0.20.205.0 fix version showed up recently. Where's the branch for that? Thanks, Eli From general-return-3329-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 20:36:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 521DB28CC for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 20:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50795 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 20:36:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50751 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 20:36:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50743 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 20:36:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 20:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.66] (HELO homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 20:36:17 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BEF202045 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=nBD6RtZfqV1I57AFXnWb3TLX9k9OGx3S+nZjRib9gMyr1U5EH2AP iNgsTjf9iFI0dfklmp4aInRQye5wSqgpZodNtvLPl+ATYmQIrCAHiN4JYvDXPDN9 wbRG/IdDAwJojS3FqUXZvuv2SxEG47bn5wFWvIk/F6mFHz1zZFJbsro= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=9wOo7jfaM8DThwmmZtlucPoIk6s=; b=EA3E3GtNFEX3fJbg2TQ46Uh54lLf RjkTzBW/238dbL62CVOhrJCK+RZpxYyse3Pn9PJrJ53q6PC3QVJNsi2wHZPANyWk 5ZvPPtSKp7p2/E6y8QJH3fbKIelPZaQCVr7jl9ZvZIdsZo8m8Yv+cPjBx6naZd44 h4V0MndIl4zepP0= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a31.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0AA3202044 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 13:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Discussions - Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 13:35:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <878CEE04-B352-45B0-B399-FB53D6A7C2CB@gbiv.com> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <05E53D57-D53A-4D05-AAA4-E99A12373ED2@Holsman.NET> <81841C06-1C7B-4BAB-BF74-85B75D155C1D@gbiv.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) PLEASE NOTE Voting +1 for a release means that you have downloaded the source code package, verified its signatures, compiled it on your platform of choice, and checked to your satisfaction that it matches the source code we have in subversion and that is is better (in your opinion) than the last Apache release of the same name. The ASF relies on that minimum amount of peer review to make sure that we don't release trojan horses, license violations, or other things that might get us sued as a foundation or as individuals. If you don't have time to do it yourself, then vote +0 (with happy feelings) and hope that there are at least three members of the PMC who do have that time. DO NOT +1 a release just because it seems like progress. Progress is in the doing, not the talking. ....Roy From general-return-3330-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 21:04:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF1EB2FE5 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99831 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99758 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99750 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 21:04:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:38 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so234624eya.35 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 14:04:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr171638eeh.195.1304456658139; Tue, 03 May 2011 14:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 14:04:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <93B30E4D-73D3-495D-9BDD-D6E697BB9FA3@apache.org> References: <93B30E4D-73D3-495D-9BDD-D6E697BB9FA3@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 14:04:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Questions wrt security branches From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Do all changes for 0.20.2xx release go through branch-0.20-security, >> then get merged to a particular -2xx branch? > > I've discussed this before on the lists, =A0but here goes: > Thanks. I should have mentioned that I followed the thread below but it was not clear that eg all changes have to go through -security to ensure a -20(n+1) branch has the changes from -20n. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201103.mbox/%3CE= 59D9A63-CC4F-4E00-97C0-B11C84C23825@apache.org%3E > branch-0.20-security is the major branch and all changes need to be commi= tted to it. > Thanks for clarifying. > The branches off of branch-0.20-security, namely branch-0.20-security-203= and branch-0.20-security-204 are the minor branches, which are branched of= f of branch-0.20-security every month or two. Within a minor branch there a= re only bug fixes. > Why the new branches instead of releasing from branch-0.20-security the way previous release branches (eg branch-0.20) have worked? > So this release, we are trying to get out the door is 0.20.203.0. A bug f= ix to it would go into 0.20.203.1. New features like disk fail in place go = into 0.20.204.0. > Shouldn't new features go to trunk and then the next minor release? According to the project's current version scheme (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap eg major.minor.point), a point release (eg the 203 in 0.20.203) "do not introduce new features or make other improvements other than fixing bugs." Is this a proposal to make branch-0.20-security a feature branch that does releases, and the new version number is necessary to allow for new features? Doesn't this allow for releases from branch-0.20-security and trunk to diverge in terms of feature set? I think people would prefer we spend our energy putting new features (not yet in trunk) in trunk so we don't create divergent releases. Creating a new branch for new features seems like it will prolong our current situation. >> Why is there a new 4th component to the version number? > > The problem is that we need minor versions and there isn't space in the c= urrent scheme. It would probably be clearer, if we called this release 1.0.= Then this looks like: > > branch-1 > branch-1.0 > branch-1.1 > > with point releases off of it. When I floated the idea of using 1.0 last = time, there was more consensus around using the 0.20.20X.Y naming. > I remember there being resistance to calling it 1.0 but I don't remember consensus on a new feature branch or 4 part version scheme. Not sure mirroring the YDH version numbers is what's most sense for an Apache release: http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_l/5560919873/in/set-72157626356732562 Arun's proposal of using 0.20.100 seemed more logical. >> I noticed a 0.20.205.0 fix version showed up recently. =A0Where's the >> branch for that? > > It hasn't branched yet, but it will come off of branch-0.20-security. > So a fix for 0.20.205.0 (like any fix for a version not yet branched) only gets checked into branch-0.20-security. Makes sense. Thanks for the clarifications. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3331-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 23:59:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E70B2BE7 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 23:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79712 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 23:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79658 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 23:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79650 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 23:59:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 23:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 23:59:30 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so989493bwz.35 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.8.141 with SMTP id h13mr465188bkh.64.1304467150329; Tue, 03 May 2011 16:59:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 16:58:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:58:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151743fa561dd8b104a267edaf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151743fa561dd8b104a267edaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to gauge what amount of stuff is in branch-0.20-security-203 I wrote a quick script which does a comparison based on JIRAs mention in the commit log. It output the following list of JIRAs that are in the branch but not committed to trunk. I've marked many as N/A meaning that they don't apply to trunk: < HADOOP-1026 < HADOOP-6304 N/A < HADOOP-6544 < HADOOP-6598 N/A < HADOOP-6638 < HADOOP-6653 N/A < HADOOP-6716 N/A < HADOOP-6718 N/A < HADOOP-6728 < HADOOP-6745 < HADOOP-6757 < HADOOP-6776 N/A < HADOOP-6808 < HADOOP-6810 N/A < HADOOP-6832 < HADOOP-6855 N/A < HADOOP-7143 N/A < HADOOP-7190 N/A < HADOOP-7232 N/A < HADOOP-7243 N/A < HADOOP-7246 (not sure about this) < HADOOP-7247 < HADOOP-7253 < HDFS-1020 N/A < HDFS-1022 < HDFS-1136 N/A < HDFS-1153 < HDFS-1158 < HDFS-1313 N/A < HDFS-495 N/A < HDFS-6599 <-- must be a typo in commit log < HDFS-740 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1088 < MAPREDUCE-1100 < MAPREDUCE-1118 < MAPREDUCE-1207 < MAPREDUCE-1361 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1376 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1442 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1521 < MAPREDUCE-1526 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1550 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1594 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1641 < MAPREDUCE-1671 < MAPREDUCE-1672 < MAPREDUCE-1676 < MAPREDUCE-1677 < MAPREDUCE-1682 < MAPREDUCE-1687 < MAPREDUCE-1699 Unclear < MAPREDUCE-1711 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1713 < MAPREDUCE-1716 < MAPREDUCE-1730 < MAPREDUCE-1741 < MAPREDUCE-1744 < MAPREDUCE-1758 < MAPREDUCE-1759 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1778 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1790 < MAPREDUCE-1807 N/A < MAPREDUCE-1854 < MAPREDUCE-1871 < MAPREDUCE-1872 < MAPREDUCE-1882 < MAPREDUCE-1889 < MAPREDUCE-1890 < MAPREDUCE-1914 < MAPREDUCE-1921 < MAPREDUCE-1933 < MAPREDUCE-1934 < MAPREDUCE-1938 < MAPREDUCE-1943 < MAPREDUCE-1954 < MAPREDUCE-1955 < MAPREDUCE-1960 < MAPREDUCE-1964 < MAPREDUCE-1966 < MAPREDUCE-1971 < MAPREDUCE-2005 N/A < MAPREDUCE-2019 < MAPREDUCE-2055 < MAPREDUCE-2316 < MAPREDUCE-2355 < MAPREDUCE-291 < MAPREDUCE-323 < MAPREDUCE-339 < MAPREDUCE-517 < MAPREDUCE-6419 <-- doesnt exist, probably typo Certainly some of these are new test cases, benchmark improvements, or system tests. But many others are large new features (e.g new metrics framework, separate JobHistory service). Others also introduce new configurations (eg new JT based limits). In the list above there are 58 that seem to be applicable, probably at least half of which are non-test code. This list above doesn't include 192 patches that were committed to the branch without reference to any JIRA in the commit message: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common$ for x in $(git rev-list origin/branch-0.20..origin/branch-0.20-security-203 -- src) ; do git log -n1 $x | egrep -q '(MAPREDUCE|HDFS|HADOOP)[-:][0-9]+' || echo $x ; done | wc -l 192 Browsing through these, many have already been forward ported, or at least had corresponding JIRAs opened. But it's very difficult to match them up and evaluate which ones have been committed. Eli pointed out one earlier this week that was done by a non-committer with no public review that introduced an apparent performance regression; it's difficult to know whether there might be others as well. Rather than being a "maintenance release" (as is usually expected when incrementing the third component of a version string) this is essentially a separate trunk off of 0.20. I agree that the advancements in this branch are many, and are a great set of contributions for the community. User limits and security are two such that have been cited in this thread; unfortunately the new improvements in limits haven't been committed to trunk, and the security in trunk has a known root exploit. Do users really want to see us putting these things in 20 without making sure they'll also show up in future releases? Looking at recent history of 204 it seems some more patches have gone in there before going into trunk as well - for example MR-2429. Arun and Sid are working on forward-porting it, and it's obviously not due to any kind of bad intent that it was missed, but it underscores the dangers of having essentially two trunks in ASF. I completely agree that there should be long-term maintenance branches at the ASF, but we need to establish a clear process to make sure that "maintenance" doesn't diverge into something else. Here are two requests that others have made but I haven't seen an answer to yet: - Document the criteria by which developers can judge whether an improvement should be included in branch-0.20-security. The inclusion criteria for the branch as it stands is not clear -- given this branch's lineage, it clearly used to be "things important for the Yahoo clusters", but that doesn't seem like a reasonable community criterion. Up until now in Hadoop's history, the criteria has always been "compatible bug fixes only", which doesn't describe this branch either. - Clearly establish the process that all patches must either be committed to trunk first (and then backported), or include a comment on the JIRA explaining why this is not necessary. Additionally we should decide whether patches must be backported "through" 0.22 or if they may skip back from trunk to 20-security. (I'm assuming 21 is dead here) Perhaps this could go on a wiki page (or web site page) regarding the currently active branches? Thanks -Todd On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > I think we still need to incorporate the patches currently checked > into branch 0.20. For example, Owen identified a major bug > (BooleanWritable's comparator is broken) and filed a jira > (HADOOP-6928) to put it in branch-0.20, where I reviewed it and > checked it in, so this bug would be fixed in the next stable release. > However this change is not in branch-0.20-security-203. Unless we put > the delta from branch-0.20 into this release, it is missing important > bug fixes that will cause it to regress against 20.3 (if it ever is > released). > > I am also nervous about changes like the one identified by > HADOOP-7255. It looks like this change caused a significant regression > in TestDFSIO throughput. It changes the core Task class, the commit > log is a single line, and as far as I can tell it was not discussed or > reviewed by anyone in the community. Don't changes like this at least > deserve a jira before we release them? > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > I think its a good idea to release hadoop-0.20.203. It moves Apache > Hadoop a > > step forward. > > > > Looks like the technical difficulties are resolved now with latest Arun's > > commits. > > Being a superset of hadoop-0.20.2 it can be considered based on one of > the > > official Apache releases. > > I don't think there was a lack of discussions on the lists about the > issues > > included in the release candidate. Todd did a thorough review of the > entire > > security branch. Many developers participated in discussions. > > Agreeing with Stack I wish HBase was considered a primary target for > Hadoop > > support. But it is not realistic to have it in hadoop-0.20.203. > > I have some experience running a version of this release candidate on a > > large cluster. It works. I would add a couple of patches, which make it > run > > on Windows for me like HADOOP-7110, HADOOP-7126. But those are not > blockers. > > > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > >> > >> On May 3, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> > >> >> > >> >> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except > >> >> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are relevant/ > >> >> necessary, I'll check with Cos. Other than that hadoop-0.20.203 now > a > >> >> superset of hadoop-0.20.2. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Missed adding HADOOP-5759 to that list, I'll check with Amareshwari > >> before committing. > >> > > >> > Arun > >> > >> Thanks for doing this so fast Arun. > >> > >> > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00151743fa561dd8b104a267edaf-- From general-return-3332-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 00:16:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C27652A58 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 00:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97513 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 00:16:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97459 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 00:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97450 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 00:16:53 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 00:16:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 00:16:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4DC09AF6.70403@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 17:16:54 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Are you simply asking for someone to go through the 450 odd jiras and > set 'fix-for' fields? Every other release we've made is well-correlated with Jira. It should not be difficult to achieve that for this one. We could write a script to take all 450 bug IDs from the change log and use Jira's command-line tool to set the "fix-for" to be this 0.20+security release. Would you like help with that? Doug From general-return-3333-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 01:02:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B0582463 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 01:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29074 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 01:02:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29019 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 01:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29011 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 01:02:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 01:02:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 01:02:03 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p4411HBb000726 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:17 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:12 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 Thread-Index: AcwJ9sVyeKRCnqhPTO655sAH70KJiQ== Message-ID: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> <4DC09AF6.70403@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC09AF6.70403@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 3, 2011, at 5:17 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> Are you simply asking for someone to go through the 450 odd jiras and >> set 'fix-for' fields? >=20 > Every other release we've made is well-correlated with Jira. It should > not be difficult to achieve that for this one. We could write a script > to take all 450 bug IDs from the change log and use Jira's command-line > tool to set the "fix-for" to be this 0.20+security release. Would you > like help with that? >=20 Yes please, that would be great. Thanks! Arun=20 From general-return-3334-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 17:32:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26E93830 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95260 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94934 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:32:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94925 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 17:32:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:32:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:32:36 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.123.81]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44HVt79014581 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 10:31:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--194398535 Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:31:55 -0700 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1--194398535 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated = the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the = last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem.=20 The candidate is at: = http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm = +1. -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-1--194398535-- From general-return-3335-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 19:18:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A70333CF6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49644 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:18:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49568 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:18:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49560 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 19:18:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:18:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:17:59 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so645158ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 12:17:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.5.200 with SMTP id 48mr725501eel.131.1304536658555; Wed, 04 May 2011 12:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:17:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:17:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen Hey Owen, Thanks for incorporating all the feedback and additional changes. It's great that this release won't be a regression against our previous stable release. I would like to call out that we are not just voting to adopt a particular release, we are starting a new version scheme for the project, doing new feature development on maintenance release branches (before trunk), and we're saying it's OK to release software that hasn't been reviewed by the community. I'd like to hear from our development community not just that we want to do a release from this branch but that we want to adopt these other changes as well. Here's a summary of the major *remaining* issues and a recommendation on how to proceed: 1. There are about ~50 changes that have jiras that are committed to the branch that are not yet in trunk. The next release (0.22) will be a regression against this release, with respect to these particular changes. Recomendation: we should get these changes in trunk before releasing so that new features do not show up in maintenace branches first. 2. There are 192 patches that were committed to the branch without reference to any Jira in the commit message. Some of these may have already been forward ported, but it is very difficult to match them up and evaluate which ones have been committed. Some are troublesome, when spot checking the commits I found some that have been done by non-committers with no public review that introduced an apparent performance regressions (eg see HADOOP-7255). Recommendation: we should update the commit log to make sure there is a jira for each issue, and all changes have been reviewed/committed. This is the way we've always done releases. 3. The new versioning scheme major.minor.point.X the new "X" component allows for new feature development on point releases. Recomendation: we should discuss in a separate thread whether we want to do new feature development on maintenance branches and if so to adopt this new version scheme. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3336-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 20:14:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1290831D2 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44155 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:14:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44095 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:14:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44087 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:14:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:14:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:13:59 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=NAvODEm6X3mgKowqZtbwzHYZRbwhSZkPf6IMQgIzJcYjpoVWojH+b0ze Rk5H7ZrW8MSHvkxlEwdVPlpLD9TaPh3McrFrT+NIYVf63HYKcX9kw2WLR DmijQOGjQOrV4nP; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304540039; x=1336076039; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5xMJDnQiwZjegL3F9xjP/eBLAbTcqlXOugVVwoauiJk=; b=FYNM0sBG7tjSFThTkV72MKkkd0LhuYh+WtrZhtWY4YpC8KO2A6TecsfD c6phK6c3ZxKYDgfbFkN96V6r9uc89byjtiLeyBlWtaCds4pS6Ke+A2136 ijZf0N1DG04tqM4; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,316,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22852564" Received: from ESV4-EXC03.linkedin.biz ([fe80::985a:a6b4:f1e1:23b0]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:17:03 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCoHKs40jdRozskC+8soYJjDqwpR9j9WA Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 20:17:02 +0000 Message-ID: <450B3108-28FA-40B2-A7F3-28747B8D2863@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On May 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the= feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last st= able release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem.=20 >=20 > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-= rc1/ >=20 > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. Am I misreading this, or are the MR protocols out of sync between 0.20.203= and 0.21? It would also appear that this is marked stable in 0.21. What i= s the user impact? From general-return-3337-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 20:27:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E39A538D9 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77817 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:27:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77747 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77739 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:27:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:27:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:27:12 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c8.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.8]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44KQZMC094736 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304540797; bh=DvigmNJ2PyPP3nX1Q/7pnM1OgqAlHkFnvN8qLL+KVds=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=Bn36eQvUxBDlXTGppgUG+JlL0ykV9KyfoyTqJb+8SPcwh3KrnqOUIEvdTZn6IsCMc 8dYHPwv96/SZopOLfVvsQTrU1GkGaxEBawgpTzU3sSo7nlURt19jy31a0HQ/JR79am 0E7AjkwNFIPoHlKR6tvyNvcCcnILCuvoXPfamKdY= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:26:35 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <69F92CFE-509C-4163-ACC4-7A11640FB7C1@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Hi Folks, This is a release vote, let's stay focused. On this thread I think = appropriate responses are either=20 +1 and some short commentary (assuming you've tried it and it works) or -1 and some short commentary. It would also be cool if you noted if = you've tried it. ---- In the spirit of my feedback, I'll respond to this under another = subject. Thanks, E14 On May 4, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley = wrote: >> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated = the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the = last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>=20 >> The candidate is at: = http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ >>=20 >> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm = +1. >>=20 >> -- Owen >=20 > Hey Owen, >=20 > Thanks for incorporating all the feedback and additional changes. It's > great that this release won't be a regression against our previous > stable release. >=20 > I would like to call out that we are not just voting to adopt a > particular release, we are starting a new version scheme for the > project, doing new feature development on maintenance release branches > (before trunk), and we're saying it's OK to release software that > hasn't been reviewed by the community. >=20 > I'd like to hear from our development community not just that we want > to do a release from this branch but that we want to adopt these other > changes as well. Here's a summary of the major *remaining* issues and > a recommendation on how to proceed: >=20 > 1. There are about ~50 changes that have jiras that are committed to > the branch that are not yet in trunk. The next release (0.22) will be > a regression against this release, with respect to these particular > changes. Recomendation: we should get these changes in trunk before > releasing so that new features do not show up in maintenace branches > first. >=20 > 2. There are 192 patches that were committed to the branch without > reference to any Jira in the commit message. Some of these may have > already been forward ported, but it is very difficult to match them up > and evaluate which ones have been committed. Some are troublesome, > when spot checking the commits I found some that have been done by > non-committers with no public review that introduced an apparent > performance regressions (eg see HADOOP-7255). Recommendation: we > should update the commit log to make sure there is a jira for each > issue, and all changes have been reviewed/committed. This is the way > we've always done releases. >=20 > 3. The new versioning scheme major.minor.point.X the new "X" component > allows for new feature development on point releases. Recomendation: > we should discuss in a separate thread whether we want to do new > feature development on maintenance branches and if so to adopt this > new version scheme. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-3338-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:03:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E233C3C46 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92347 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:03:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92307 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:03:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92299 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:03:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:03:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:03:49 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so708339ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.40.156 with SMTP id f28mr798303eeb.35.1304546609375; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:03:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. Rationale: This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that has been used for all previous releases. This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. We should establish new process before the release, a release is not the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development process or versioning . I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the existing, established community process. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3339-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:06:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C0DC3FA8 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97937 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:06:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97887 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97879 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:06:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:06:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:06:39 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.201]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p44M5rNU072803 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304546753; bh=u2CKIg3Z1PzjLQRll70R2mLSksVQuamfoIWp85SNFRM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=EiQrKuwhlE/z9lq4BsYqGoOpuaZSzhaWP6DB5QfvIl/VAz6Rv//YSu8JfTnGsLjl6 VVh+66IdZJfM78RGlRJYuwhPtC/JBj0kvsa/E0Vtw8TT6IqfhM9/nen4S8DxJQiaYN lu7NGB92VTXg3l4mEMXmyiFFXFSpMUPAU7WYd0m8= Message-Id: <590F865D-2DF9-4A72-A7BC-2EE5EE9CB24A@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:05:52 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've > incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from > 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse- > plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, > I'm +1. > +1 Downloaded release, checked checksums, built, deployed single-node cluster. Arun From general-return-3340-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:07:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A54C3FDD for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 806 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:07:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 760 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:07:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 752 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:07:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:07:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:07:02 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p44M6Iov073016 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:06:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304546778; bh=9L2fMYMjkerauRs/hx64E0y1oWXps2AIQHFl0XnDuCs=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=FFNJKF6RB9Tuw+Li2a3xypBRsqSVyzAqvVBZjH+0afmVHEZvScNxwW+kqkA8RdUwQ GqdPo9fdMKCzQmOk49fM0sBLx+0S/Wn4KTHyHm64vUAEnE2ChJProX15RprrD/PzaR NtJMqUyE+GPequM1H31bNj84vvBUbQCKqtAu7gwI= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:06:18 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:06:16 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKpz4FhTLAcTIqSb+M8SFDEET6ZgAAD7/6 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Eli, How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? Regards, Suresh On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated th= e >> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last >> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>=20 >> The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0= -rc1/ >>=20 >> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1= . >>=20 >> -- Owen >=20 > While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. Ratio= nale: >=20 > This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would > cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against > our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. >=20 > This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via > the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release > branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that > has been used for all previous releases. >=20 > This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature > development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without > sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. >=20 > We should establish new process before the release, a release is not > the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development > process or versioning . >=20 > I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the > existing, established community process. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-3341-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:17:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C2D3A6E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13661 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:17:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13615 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13607 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:17:26 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:17:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:17:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4DC1D076.4040004@apache.org> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 15:17:26 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -1 This candidate has lots of patches that are not in trunk, potentially adding regressions to 0.22 and 0.23. This should be addressed before we release from 0.20-security. We should also not move to four-component version numbering. A release from the 0.20-security branch should perhaps be called 0.20.100. Doug On 05/04/2011 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3342-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:24:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA22837AF for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29469 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29408 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29400 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:24:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:33 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2366309bwz.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.11.22 with SMTP id r22mr703834bkr.172.1304547852148; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:24:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC1D076.4040004@apache.org> References: <4DC1D076.4040004@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:23:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255585b251e12304a27ab79f --0003255585b251e12304a27ab79f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -1 for the same reasons I outlined in my email yesterday. This is not a community artifact following the community's processes, and thus should not be an official release until those issues are addressed. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > -1 > > This candidate has lots of patches that are not in trunk, potentially > adding regressions to 0.22 and 0.23. This should be addressed before we > release from 0.20-security. We should also not move to four-component > version numbering. A release from the 0.20-security branch should > perhaps be called 0.20.100. > > Doug > > On 05/04/2011 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the > feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last > stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > > > The candidate is at: > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > -- Owen > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0003255585b251e12304a27ab79f-- From general-return-3343-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:24:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADF8337D9 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30885 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:24:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30815 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:24:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30805 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:24:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:34 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so715273ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:24:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr820258eeh.195.1304547854412; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:24:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:24:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With my Cloudera hat on.. When we went through the 10x and 20x patches we only pulled a subset of them, primarily for security and the general improvements that we thought were good. We found both incompatible changes and some sketchy changes that we did not pull in from a quality perspective. There is a big difference between a patch set that's acceptable for Yahoo!'s user base and one that's a more general artifact. When we evaluated the YDH patch sets we were using that frame of mind. I'm now looking it in terms of an Apache release. And the place to review changes for an Apache release is on jira. CDH3 is based on the latest stable Apache release (20.2) so it doesn't regress against it. I'm nervous about rebasing future releases on 203 because of the compatibility and quality implications. Thanks, Eli On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Suresh Srinivas wr= ote: > Eli, > > How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? > > Regards, > Suresh > > > On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >>> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated t= he >>> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last >>> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>> >>> The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.= 0-rc1/ >>> >>> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm += 1. >>> >>> -- Owen >> >> While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. =A0Ra= tionale: >> >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would >> cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against >> our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. >> >> This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via >> the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release >> branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that >> has been used for all previous releases. >> >> This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature >> development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without >> sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. >> >> We should establish new process before the release, a release is not >> the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development >> process or versioning . >> >> I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the >> existing, established community process. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > > From general-return-3344-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:30:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01019396D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39016 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38962 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38954 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:30:04 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1856700wwi.29 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:29:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fmxIhh3AQswrvRAhbDi7PKtyHc7Tzk9ZR8b02+ax4QQ=; b=Ad1ub2unbCCV8MWtFN1gW1JSN8uHMKvDPNPMFFJGZx3Er3glamnRY/spm/tNH48zdg uZ+Db1diSxezHymY3rTFTqD0e+Pr1GnVrzBlGT5qkDwInsunHhRrv5ykvD+omyuT/W3X 9EqHMJlpVxhrN3k+xE19wWu1AyAL/J1VWevbg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZQ+Xmp8uPUw6eZRw+HlXFWkjoGk+J08NzATalf1AzVpiaHtXn8oUPSioRF4ZQeWH3f L95SQ2HTheBgdCXs/jnpcSs72ol8OovqvHMYnTnwSSvHw07RAH53Jf2mY3Z/op4SFKR7 7tpt/6azrQ+tdL6dosWkPFL0fIv4JPt7q31ug= Received: by 10.216.203.195 with SMTP id f45mr5405504weo.89.1304548184097; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:29:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.80 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:29:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jakob Homan Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:29:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org @Eli >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. If you've compiled this list, can you post it? On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > With my Cloudera hat on.. > > When we went through the 10x and 20x patches we only pulled a subset > of them, primarily for security and the general improvements that we > thought were good. =A0We found both incompatible changes and some > sketchy changes that we did not pull in from a quality perspective. > There is a big difference between a patch set that's acceptable for > Yahoo!'s user base and one that's a more general artifact. > > When we evaluated the YDH patch sets we were using that frame of mind. > =A0I'm now looking it in terms of an Apache release. And the place to > review changes for an Apache release is on jira. > > CDH3 is based on the latest stable Apache release (20.2) so it doesn't > regress against it. =A0I'm nervous about rebasing future releases on 203 > because of the compatibility and quality implications. > > Thanks, > Eli > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Suresh Srinivas = wrote: >> Eli, >> >> How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? >> >> Regards, >> Suresh >> >> >> On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wro= te: >>>> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated = the >>>> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the las= t >>>> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>>> >>>> The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203= .0-rc1/ >>>> >>>> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm = +1. >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>> >>> While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. =A0R= ationale: >>> >>> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would >>> cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against >>> our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. >>> >>> This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via >>> the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release >>> branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that >>> has been used for all previous releases. >>> >>> This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature >>> development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without >>> sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. >>> >>> We should establish new process before the release, a release is not >>> the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development >>> process or versioning . >>> >>> I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the >>> existing, established community process. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eli >> >> > From general-return-3345-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:31:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1692B3FFF for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41092 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:31:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41043 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41033 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:31:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:31:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:31:29 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2373036bwz.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.143 with SMTP id b15mr1661095bkl.118.1304548267304; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:30:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef9010a71704a27ad0b3 --0016e6d7ef9010a71704a27ad0b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 With Cloudera hat on, I agree with Eli's assessment. With Apache hat on, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the task at hand. I would make the same arguments against taking CDH3 and releasing it as an ASF artifact -- we'd also have a certain amount of work to do to make sure that all of the patches are in trunk, first. Additionally, I'd want to outline what the inclusion criteria would be for that branch. -Todd On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > With my Cloudera hat on.. > > When we went through the 10x and 20x patches we only pulled a subset > of them, primarily for security and the general improvements that we > thought were good. We found both incompatible changes and some > sketchy changes that we did not pull in from a quality perspective. > There is a big difference between a patch set that's acceptable for > Yahoo!'s user base and one that's a more general artifact. > > When we evaluated the YDH patch sets we were using that frame of mind. > I'm now looking it in terms of an Apache release. And the place to > review changes for an Apache release is on jira. > > CDH3 is based on the latest stable Apache release (20.2) so it doesn't > regress against it. I'm nervous about rebasing future releases on 203 > because of the compatibility and quality implications. > > Thanks, > Eli > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Suresh Srinivas > wrote: > > Eli, > > > > How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? > > > > Regards, > > Suresh > > > > > > On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >>> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated > the > >>> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last > >>> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > >>> > >>> The candidate is at: > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > >>> > >>> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm > +1. > >>> > >>> -- Owen > >> > >> While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. > Rationale: > >> > >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would > >> cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against > >> our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. > >> > >> This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via > >> the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release > >> branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that > >> has been used for all previous releases. > >> > >> This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature > >> development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without > >> sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. > >> > >> We should establish new process before the release, a release is not > >> the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development > >> process or versioning . > >> > >> I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the > >> existing, established community process. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Eli > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d7ef9010a71704a27ad0b3-- From general-return-3346-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:36:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 623C53E22 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47063 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:36:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47013 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:36:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47005 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:36:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:36:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:36:37 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so717192eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:36:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.50.196 with SMTP id z44mr783860eeb.227.1304548576913; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:36:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > @Eli >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. > If you've compiled this list, can you post it? > Here's the list Todd posted yesterday: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimKKbkuPCz61TU=8-nO8Z6PYhf7Sg@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks, Eli From general-return-3347-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:41:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39CC23EC9 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50898 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:41:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50841 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:41:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50833 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:41:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:41:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:41:40 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44Mf2dK037183 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:41:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304548863; bh=7uqtMbzD6mRwXizPzROVFvjVkTImwJBpsJnWY+nC3nc=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=tcyGmrmtqigWic9iFXEsN72PUZ95G1pIQHHUlg3zr+uAP8ncZS/Sw15l6QvCd8uLq yxbpyrZehK6cURbyw8FEyIqYtXKFGWpyDlfmRpXfXy26TaEMHZlddgPD2w4HZIjTNy SUYpgkdL/gFfs9TBpVWoQWUHTUm98NVbfdQPe3a4= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:41:02 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:41:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKqxAcJO5eMBmKSQao+BVskYWtvQAAUcNy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Here is a snippet from your blog - http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2010/10/cdh3-beta-3-now-available/ ------ Security Enhancements As one of the primary contributors and largest production users of Hadoop, Yahoo! publishes the source tree for the version of Hadoop that they run on their production clusters. We are pleased to announce that we have merged Yahoo=B9s source tree into CDH3b3. This merge brings many improvements developed at Yahoo! into CDH, including improvements for MapReduce scalability on 1000+-node clusters and several new tools for benchmarking and testing Hadoop. ------ It would be great, if you can list how many of 192 changes were reviewed an= d became part of CDH. Your -1 vote essentially blocks the changes that are already available in CDH to be available from Apache open source! On 5/4/11 3:30 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > With Cloudera hat on, I agree with Eli's assessment. >=20 > With Apache hat on, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the task a= t > hand. I would make the same arguments against taking CDH3 and releasing i= t > as an ASF artifact -- we'd also have a certain amount of work to do to ma= ke > sure that all of the patches are in trunk, first. Additionally, I'd want = to > outline what the inclusion criteria would be for that branch. >=20 > -Todd >=20 > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 >> With my Cloudera hat on.. >>=20 >> When we went through the 10x and 20x patches we only pulled a subset >> of them, primarily for security and the general improvements that we >> thought were good. We found both incompatible changes and some >> sketchy changes that we did not pull in from a quality perspective. >> There is a big difference between a patch set that's acceptable for >> Yahoo!'s user base and one that's a more general artifact. >>=20 >> When we evaluated the YDH patch sets we were using that frame of mind. >> I'm now looking it in terms of an Apache release. And the place to >> review changes for an Apache release is on jira. >>=20 >> CDH3 is based on the latest stable Apache release (20.2) so it doesn't >> regress against it. I'm nervous about rebasing future releases on 203 >> because of the compatibility and quality implications. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Eli >>=20 >>=20 >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Suresh Srinivas >> wrote: >>> Eli, >>>=20 >>> How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Suresh >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >>>>> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated >> the >>>>> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the la= st >>>>> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>>>>=20 >>>>> The candidate is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ >>>>>=20 >>>>> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm >> +1. >>>>>=20 >>>>> -- Owen >>>>=20 >>>> While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. >> Rationale: >>>>=20 >>>> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would >>>> cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against >>>> our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. >>>>=20 >>>> This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via >>>> the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release >>>> branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that >>>> has been used for all previous releases. >>>>=20 >>>> This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature >>>> development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without >>>> sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. >>>>=20 >>>> We should establish new process before the release, a release is not >>>> the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development >>>> process or versioning . >>>>=20 >>>> I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the >>>> existing, established community process. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eli >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3348-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:51:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3987433F6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60973 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:51:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60924 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60916 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:51:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:51:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so723392ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:51:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.46.214 with SMTP id r62mr757945eeb.99.1304549486642; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:51:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:51:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Your -1 vote essentially blocks the changes that are already available in > CDH to be available from Apache open source! As Eric mentioned, this thread is about an Apache release, not CDH. My -1 vote does not block these changes from being released via Apache. You can not veto a release. Releases are lazy majority, the release is only blocked if there are more -1 votes than +1 votes. If these changes are contributed on jira, discussed and reviewed, and committed to trunk I'm happy to support the release. There's a big difference between asking that a release respect the Apache community process and blocking it. If you want to get the release out how about contributing the work via the normal means so the community can review it like we review all other code changes. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3349-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:09:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 176C83B8F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80499 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:09:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80447 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:09:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80439 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:09:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:09:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.222] (HELO nm25.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:09:33 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm25.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2011 23:09:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.171] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2011 23:09:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1054.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2011 23:09:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 549727.21227.bm@omp1054.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 54768 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2011 23:09:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304550552; bh=YuKBVr2+P8/o31wTbbEnhFzhXKT53RV+PzPidPh6dBM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ieBnz6hhrX0jCKSbkYaAS/VxTJUNYvgEgM4hTX3ya1jLalNUBCCQjDkj0Jm55VDZ6dwGyJANGad7CxuyWkMZ8xsxXm5TLhjT8Cxwu3N7GnYS0WLW4CgSW/IGx75ZSgPHFuk2h//XGLiYAz/iZnc66yONDO11ME7vK4xepdLUht0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sNvxdnXTZsSnKDcDn6Pd8IgGuf9EeeCYGWpxEoEUGesquYJMzsk7S98UxGKy7hTW6qopCMwMUP7/+zKDujY/NTfUFMv4mom+2A3DYdxICU2OAaTRqyZ/Hy9/5dChVTaeCn7LX4PsNgvILBl1IqhTA7e45gdKiqsec14JNQ5jBYg=; Message-ID: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: cely7lcVM1ldAKpSSCG9EvLVP3QghvvKw8h3T8anOK4H2g2 lAbDwIIe3sZMRo1OEivCAION1Cc_yzOr656m1Km74WdTBanLnnhCcCSBXrCo WeLEYzKkYmah7CLTdTto3cF9b3gYyIUrzobFTo9zD1qATyLy2c4zhzaHsJld m7bsqFlk3aPtw_MOua.5ZpKurMG1ak_psJblHxUiIrjYGp1kC_UOVFwWlcf5 kV4ALUELsavX5HOCJsiF1dTc5RO1JNy2UEdLbaH.YiBNLVTKjC2w6npEfBf8 Q5S76oIreqAzzjY3.eJwkS5i32x8cLRK07PiBMtkkZG33nsEHODTgsgcGXA1 zUEFFiK63Srqqkb1_7L6CLv1p2bzN3m93y4LHWamb4WGUC_TORCiCEyTF5Lr baDlL.1eLujoKKlE1LpvihuEU80QfLwteMg-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:09:12 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:09:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-451605876-1304550552=:51699" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-451605876-1304550552=:51699 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A items. All are false positives. < HADOOP-6304 N/A -- fixed in trunk via HADOOP-7110 (Todd, it was fixed by you. Forgot?) < HADOOP-6598 N/A -- moved to HADOOP-6763 and committed to trunk < HADOOP-6653 N/A -- not applicable in trunk < HADOOP-6716 N/A -- as part of HADOOP-6815 which was committed to trunk < HADOOP-6718 N/A -- Incorporated in HADOOP-6706 for 0.22. < HADOOP-6776 N/A -- Tom White said "This is fixed in trunk, so can be closed." Regards, Nicholas ________________________________ From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 3:36:16 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > @Eli >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. > If you've compiled this list, can you post it? > Here's the list Todd posted yesterday: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimKKbkuPCz61TU=8-nO8Z6PYhf7Sg@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks, Eli --0-451605876-1304550552=:51699-- From general-return-3350-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:12:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400F33C3D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84753 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84693 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84685 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:11:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:11:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:11:45 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so728900ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:11:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.17.100 with SMTP id i76mr812605eei.67.1304550683871; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:11:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:11:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > The list seems highly inaccurate. =A0Checked the first few N/A items. =A0= All are > false positives. Yes, that's why those are marked N/A ie "Not applicable". Check out the non N/A ones. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3351-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:13:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B2543C8D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87577 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:13:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87531 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87523 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:13:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:13:12 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.201]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44NBrOS046750 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:11:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304550714; bh=4Y4EVUclYhx6KYuAqN1eIn/VPn2SlkPwFSOoeoGHHt4=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=va6J65AHObsB7ab7EMDr/dCFC7YNtYBqrmWa+k3QkBXriLIZJU1FSTrCB0zd8AAzk /2ugxGnFQ7F7v+Gt61N7PjPNBeYPQtcRtxU7EGnFq664gQNA+4Yc4yICbotVjiHrA+ u/ioshWoNA9g5P4VzAadyEsa4Hb1DQ5ukFh7OOso= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:11:53 -0700 References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A items. > All are > false positives. > Also, can you please provide a list on features which are not related to gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? Please remember, and I have said this on list and off-list, that many of the forward ports obviated the need for multiple patches which show up in the commit logs. thanks, Arun > < HADOOP-6304 N/A -- fixed in trunk via HADOOP-7110 (Todd, it was > fixed by you. > Forgot?) > < HADOOP-6598 N/A -- moved to HADOOP-6763 and committed to trunk > < HADOOP-6653 N/A -- not applicable in trunk > < HADOOP-6716 N/A -- as part of HADOOP-6815 which was committed to > trunk > < HADOOP-6718 N/A -- Incorporated in HADOOP-6706 for 0.22. > < HADOOP-6776 N/A -- Tom White said "This is fixed in trunk, so can > be closed." > > Regards, > Nicholas > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Eli Collins > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 3:36:16 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> @Eli >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. >> If you've compiled this list, can you post it? >> > > Here's the list Todd posted yesterday: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimKKbkuPCz61TU=8-nO8Z6PYhf7Sg@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-3352-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:20:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A82B6318C for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94612 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94549 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:20:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94541 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:20:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:20:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:20:02 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.123.81]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44NJBcH003126 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: "Owen O'Malley" In-Reply-To: <450B3108-28FA-40B2-A7F3-28747B8D2863@linkedin.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:19:11 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <450B3108-28FA-40B2-A7F3-28747B8D2863@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 4, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > Am I misreading this, or are the MR protocols out of sync = between 0.20.203 and 0.21? It would also appear that this is marked = stable in 0.21. What is the user impact? The names of the protocols were changed, but the names of the protocols = aren't user-facing. The protocols themselves also changed, as with all = Hadoop major versions. (We need to switch to protobuf or something for = RPC to provide wire compatibility.)=20 -- Owen= From general-return-3353-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B03B3247 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6152 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6103 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6094 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:29:27 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:29:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:29:26 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2146235fxm.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.106.70 with SMTP id w6mr1954171fao.68.1304551765108; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.144.197 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <590F865D-2DF9-4A72-A7BC-2EE5EE9CB24A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <590F865D-2DF9-4A72-A7BC-2EE5EE9CB24A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:29:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 for the release. I downloaded the release, verified checksums, built and deployed. Ran randomwriter jobs on it. Everything passes. -- thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the >> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last >> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >> >> The candidate is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ >> >> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. >> > > +1 > > Downloaded release, checked checksums, built, deployed single-node cluster. > > Arun > > From general-return-3354-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 034B9334E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9200 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:33:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9134 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9126 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:33:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:33:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:33:20 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so1083113pwi.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.15.168 with SMTP id y8mr2172461pbc.337.1304551979070; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:32:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.230 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:32:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:32:39 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BA_jgKIVeM3bnZEP3LmsPOcXo2o Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 15:06, Suresh Srinivas wrot= e: > Eli, > > How many of these patches that you find troublesome are in CDH already? How is that relevant to the release vote and discrepancies listed in Eli's email? > Regards, > Suresh > > > On 5/4/11 3:03 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >>> Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated t= he >>> feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last >>> stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. >>> >>> The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.= 0-rc1/ >>> >>> Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm += 1. >>> >>> -- Owen >> >> While rc2 is an improvement on rc1, I am -1 on this particular rc. =A0Ra= tionale: >> >> This rc contains many patches not yet committed to trunk. This would >> cause the next major release (0.22) to be a feature regression against >> our latest stable release (203), were 0.22 released soon. >> >> This rc contains many patches not yet reviewed by the community via >> the normal process (jira, patch against trunk, merge to a release >> branch). I think we should respect the existing community process that >> has been used for all previous releases. >> >> This rc introduces a new development and braching model (new feature >> development outside trunk) and Hadoop versioning scheme without >> sufficient discussion or proposal of these changes with the community. >> >> We should establish new process before the release, a release is not >> the appropriate mechanism for changing our review and development >> process or versioning . >> >> I do support a release from branch-0.20-security that follows the >> existing, established community process. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli > > From general-return-3355-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F6FE3D91 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21229 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21161 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21153 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:45:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:45:21 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2437914bwz.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.143 with SMTP id b15mr1711672bkl.118.1304552701145; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:45:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:44:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:44:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef9057b2ee04a27bd876 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7ef9057b2ee04a27bd876 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > > The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A items. All >> are >> false positives. >> >> > Also, can you please provide a list on features which are not related to > gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? > Here are a few I quickly pulled up: MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) " BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility into startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this feature, where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, and it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared to trunk due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is still on the "yahoo-merge" branch,. "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 3418543, 4217546" - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, but not committed. - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: " . Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overhead in LocalDirAllocator" not in trunk + BZ4101537 . When a queue is built without any access rights we explain the + problem. (dking, rvw ramach) [attachment of 2010-11-24] seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, despite the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in trunk) " . Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration from TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178. Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job history files are managed Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, though probably will be attacked by different JIRAs Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewed from a separate server Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and friends which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from looking at the last couple months of 203. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d7ef9057b2ee04a27bd876-- From general-return-3356-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:46:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F7CC372C for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22924 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:46:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22868 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:46:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22859 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:46:50 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:46:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:46:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4DC1E56A.2010209@apache.org> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 16:46:50 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <4DBEF0C1.2050306@apache.org> <4DBF16CF.3030905@apache.org> <247DDA36-BCD7-4EE9-A8CD-AD8E62C94F16@yahoo-inc.com> <4DBF2040.90602@apache.org> <5F90B548-37ED-4DB8-AAE3-D1C2BB5C700A@yahoo-inc.com> <4DC09AF6.70403@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/03/2011 06:01 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On May 3, 2011, at 5:17 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > >> On 05/02/2011 02:33 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> Are you simply asking for someone to go through the 450 odd jiras and >>> set 'fix-for' fields? >> >> Every other release we've made is well-correlated with Jira. It should >> not be difficult to achieve that for this one. We could write a script >> to take all 450 bug IDs from the change log and use Jira's command-line >> tool to set the "fix-for" to be this 0.20+security release. Would you >> like help with that? >> > > Yes please, that would be great. Thanks! Please find below a script that will add a fix-version to issues. Doug #!/bin/bash # reads bug ids from standard input # and adds the fixVersion named on command line if [ $# -eq 0 ] then echo "Usage: $0 bugid" exit 1 fi fix=$1 echo Setting fix version to $fix. server=https://issues.apache.org/jira jira=./jira-cli-2.0.0/jira.sh set -e echo -n "Jira username: " read user echo -n "Jira password: " stty -echo read password stty echo while read issue do # first read the old fix versions old=`$jira -a getFieldValue --server $server \ --password $password --user $user \ --issue $issue --field fixVersions | \ tail -n 1 | sed 's/([0-9]*)//g' | sed s/\'//g` # now update, adding new value # jira will ignore if this value is already present $jira -a updateIssue --server $server \ --password $password --user $user \ --issue $issue --fixVersions "${old},${fix}" done From general-return-3357-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:56:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248C3302E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29827 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29775 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29766 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:56:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:56:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:56:24 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-201.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.201]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p44Ntgom059120 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:55:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304553343; bh=S/fmmR6hku0Np/f2ltcuOpsy2EdIYfhET3ZXzHnIGQE=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=mHpCDCprYZFfkMs+d9avVxvNhB9F/VczHbqFi6PO5RdNFD0YjVh5ub5DEaCWMQ294 sZFktYMyUbeSdZp0W25HHpfnNTZO+roXvnkDITKJLuMXaP4jvn2OaJwK9m21X5Lozu ZmZKSzHGQrwKvYchI0VpA+lnq5zVUZO3c8kQQrLk= Message-Id: <96D8EC41-E319-4FCE-BF05-CDD9E06CC0AA@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:55:42 -0700 References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > >> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> >> The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A >> items. All >>> are >>> false positives. >>> >>> >> Also, can you please provide a list on features which are not >> related to >> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >> > > Here are a few I quickly pulled up: So, it's around 10? Approximately? Also, the ones you put up were reviewed via jira. Please note that several of the ones you are pointing out are already in y-merge branch which is nearly trunk. including MR-2378 as you pointed out. Thanks for the list, I'll ensure we work on forward porting them. Arun From general-return-3358-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:06:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E22D3693 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40201 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:06:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40140 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40132 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:06:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:06:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:06:36 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4505xFN033775; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:05:59 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:05:50 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKuDasuitIdCivTxePKzk9K10thg== Message-ID: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi folks, Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. This i= s a vote.=20 To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and find an = acceptable proposal.=20 To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for total= lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I think = all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and divid= e up the work.=20 If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no matte= r what company you work for! Thanks, --- E14 - typing on glass On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>=20 >> The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A items. All >>> are >>> false positives. >>>=20 >>>=20 >> Also, can you please provide a list on features which are not related t= o >> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>=20 >=20 > Here are a few I quickly pulled up: > MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) > MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >=20 > " BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility into > startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" > - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this featu= re, > where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, and > it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >=20 > MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) > - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared to tr= unk > due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is still o= n > the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >=20 > "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter > MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 3418543, > 4217546" > - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, but no= t > committed. >=20 > - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: > " . Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overhead in > LocalDirAllocator" > not in trunk >=20 > + BZ4101537 . When a queue is built without any access rights we expl= ain > the > + problem. (dking, rvw ramach) [attachment of 2010-11-24] > seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, desp= ite > the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in trunk) >=20 > " . Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration from > TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" > Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178. >=20 > Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job history > files are managed > Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, though > probably will be attacked by different JIRAs > Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system > Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewed fr= om > a separate server > Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and friends > which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >=20 > I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from looking a= t > the last couple months of 203. >=20 > -Todd > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3359-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:22:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 578F93D11 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54059 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:22:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54011 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54003 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:22:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:22:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:22:28 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so745624ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:22:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.17.100 with SMTP id i76mr829954eei.67.1304554928003; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:22:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:22:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Good suggestion, it would be helpful to hash out the issues around compatibility, feature branches, version numbers, how to contribute at Apache before putting up new votes that would be helpful, ie the vote would go much smoother if all the issues with the previous vote were addressed before starting a new one. Thanks, Eli On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi folks, > > Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. This= is a vote. > > To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and find a= n acceptable proposal. > > To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for tot= al lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I thin= k all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and div= ide up the work. > > If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no mat= ter what company you work for! > > Thanks, > > --- > E14 - typing on glass > > On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>> >>> The list seems highly inaccurate. =A0Checked the first few N/A items. = =A0All >>>> are >>>> false positives. >>>> >>>> >>> Also, =A0can you please provide a list on features which are not relate= d to >>> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>> >> >> Here are a few I quickly pulled up: >> MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) >> MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >> >> " =A0 BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility i= nto >> startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" >> - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this feat= ure, >> where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, an= d >> it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >> >> MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) >> - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared to t= runk >> due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is still = on >> the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >> >> "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 341= 8543, >> 4217546" >> - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, but n= ot >> committed. >> >> - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: >> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overhea= d in >> LocalDirAllocator" >> not in trunk >> >> + =A0 =A0BZ4101537 . =A0When a queue is built without any access rights = we explain >> the >> + =A0 =A0problem. =A0(dking, rvw ramach) =A0[attachment of 2010-11-24] >> seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, des= pite >> the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in trunk= ) >> >> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration fr= om >> TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" >> Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178. >> >> Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job history >> files are managed >> Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, though >> probably will be attacked by different JIRAs >> Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system >> Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewed f= rom >> a separate server >> Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and friends >> which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >> >> I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from looking = at >> the last couple months of 203. >> >> -Todd >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3360-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:30:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7A23345C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59125 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:30:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59065 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:30:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59057 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:30:56 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:30:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:30:56 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2189961fxm.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:30:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.106.70 with SMTP id w6mr1995575fao.68.1304555454277; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.144.197 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:30:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:30:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eli, I think the intent from the email was to just vote on this thread, which I agree with. Discussions should be done in a separate threads. Hopefully we can all stick to just voting! thanks mahadev On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Good suggestion, it would be helpful to hash out the issues around > compatibility, feature branches, version numbers, how to contribute at > Apache before putting up new votes that would be helpful, ie the vote > would go much smoother if all the issues with the previous vote were > addressed before starting a new one. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. Thi= s is a vote. >> >> To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and find = an acceptable proposal. >> >> To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for to= tal lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I thi= nk all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and di= vide up the work. >> >> If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no ma= tter what company you work for! >> >> Thanks, >> >> --- >> E14 - typing on glass >> >> On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote= : >>> >>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>> >>>> The list seems highly inaccurate. =A0Checked the first few N/A items. = =A0All >>>>> are >>>>> false positives. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Also, =A0can you please provide a list on features which are not relat= ed to >>>> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>>> >>> >>> Here are a few I quickly pulled up: >>> MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) >>> MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >>> >>> " =A0 BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility = into >>> startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" >>> - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this fea= ture, >>> where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, a= nd >>> it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >>> >>> MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) >>> - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared to = trunk >>> due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is still= on >>> the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >>> >>> "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 34= 18543, >>> 4217546" >>> - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, but = not >>> committed. >>> >>> - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: >>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overhe= ad in >>> LocalDirAllocator" >>> not in trunk >>> >>> + =A0 =A0BZ4101537 . =A0When a queue is built without any access rights= we explain >>> the >>> + =A0 =A0problem. =A0(dking, rvw ramach) =A0[attachment of 2010-11-24] >>> seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, de= spite >>> the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in trun= k) >>> >>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration f= rom >>> TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" >>> Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178. >>> >>> Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job history >>> files are managed >>> Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, thoug= h >>> probably will be attacked by different JIRAs >>> Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system >>> Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewed = from >>> a separate server >>> Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and friend= s >>> which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >>> >>> I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from looking= at >>> the last couple months of 203. >>> >>> -Todd >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > --=20 thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar From general-return-3361-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:39:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EBB0357F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72870 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72825 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72817 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:39:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:39:48 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so747979eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:39:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.5.200 with SMTP id 48mr834347eel.131.1304555968523; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:39:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:39:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. Ie before we release this we should understand what that means. What is being proposed is not just another release from branch-0.20 or branch-0.22. Thanks, Eli On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Eli, > =A0I think the intent from the email was to just vote on this thread, > which I agree with. > =A0Discussions should be done in a separate threads. Hopefully we can > all stick to just voting! > > thanks > mahadev > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Good suggestion, it would be helpful to hash out the issues around >> compatibility, feature branches, version numbers, how to contribute at >> Apache before putting up new votes that would be helpful, ie the vote >> would go much smoother if all the issues with the previous vote were >> addressed before starting a new one. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. Th= is is a vote. >>> >>> To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and find= an acceptable proposal. >>> >>> To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for t= otal lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I th= ink all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and d= ivide up the work. >>> >>> If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no m= atter what company you work for! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> --- >>> E14 - typing on glass >>> >>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrot= e: >>>> >>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The list seems highly inaccurate. =A0Checked the first few N/A items.= =A0All >>>>>> are >>>>>> false positives. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Also, =A0can you please provide a list on features which are not rela= ted to >>>>> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Here are a few I quickly pulled up: >>>> MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) >>>> MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >>>> >>>> " =A0 BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility= into >>>> startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" >>>> - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this fe= ature, >>>> where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, = and >>>> it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >>>> >>>> MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) >>>> - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared to= trunk >>>> due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is stil= l on >>>> the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >>>> >>>> "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 3= 418543, >>>> 4217546" >>>> - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, but= not >>>> committed. >>>> >>>> - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: >>>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overh= ead in >>>> LocalDirAllocator" >>>> not in trunk >>>> >>>> + =A0 =A0BZ4101537 . =A0When a queue is built without any access right= s we explain >>>> the >>>> + =A0 =A0problem. =A0(dking, rvw ramach) =A0[attachment of 2010-11-24] >>>> seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, d= espite >>>> the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in tru= nk) >>>> >>>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration = from >>>> TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" >>>> Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178. >>>> >>>> Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job histor= y >>>> files are managed >>>> Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, thou= gh >>>> probably will be attacked by different JIRAs >>>> Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system >>>> Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewed= from >>>> a separate server >>>> Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and frien= ds >>>> which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >>>> >>>> I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from lookin= g at >>>> the last couple months of 203. >>>> >>>> -Todd >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> > > > > -- > thanks > mahadev > @mahadevkonar > From general-return-3362-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B3D372B for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76793 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76738 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76730 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:44:25 +0000 Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so1142434pxi.2 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.15.168 with SMTP id y8mr2247377pbc.337.1304556244099; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:44:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.230 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:43:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:43:44 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CUiGBQrVBnER0AQhW8a145KO9hw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I tend to agree. Changing release model of Apache Hadoop train isn't something that should be done in a hassle or as a part of release voting. If these questions aren't addressed - let's postpone the vote and discuss all the complications or implications until they sorted out or the consensus/compromise is reached. Cos On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 17:39, Eli Collins wrote: > The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > Ie before we release this we should understand what that means. What > is being proposed is not just another release from branch-0.20 or > branch-0.22. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >> Eli, >> =A0I think the intent from the email was to just vote on this thread, >> which I agree with. >> =A0Discussions should be done in a separate threads. Hopefully we can >> all stick to just voting! >> >> thanks >> mahadev >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> Good suggestion, it would be helpful to hash out the issues around >>> compatibility, feature branches, version numbers, how to contribute at >>> Apache before putting up new votes that would be helpful, ie the vote >>> would go much smoother if all the issues with the previous vote were >>> addressed before starting a new one. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eli >>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >>> wrote: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. T= his is a vote. >>>> >>>> To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and fin= d an acceptable proposal. >>>> >>>> To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for = total lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I t= hink all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and = divide up the work. >>>> >>>> If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no = matter what company you work for! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> --- >>>> E14 - typing on glass >>>> >>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wro= te: >>>>> >>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The list seems highly inaccurate. =A0Checked the first few N/A items= . =A0All >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> false positives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Also, =A0can you please provide a list on features which are not rel= ated to >>>>>> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here are a few I quickly pulled up: >>>>> MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) >>>>> MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >>>>> >>>>> " =A0 BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibilit= y into >>>>> startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" >>>>> - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this f= eature, >>>>> where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach,= and >>>>> it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >>>>> >>>>> MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) >>>>> - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared t= o trunk >>>>> due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is sti= ll on >>>>> the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >>>>> >>>>> "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, = 3418543, >>>>> 4217546" >>>>> - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, bu= t not >>>>> committed. >>>>> >>>>> - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: >>>>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation over= head in >>>>> LocalDirAllocator" >>>>> not in trunk >>>>> >>>>> + =A0 =A0BZ4101537 . =A0When a queue is built without any access righ= ts we explain >>>>> the >>>>> + =A0 =A0problem. =A0(dking, rvw ramach) =A0[attachment of 2010-11-24= ] >>>>> seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell, = despite >>>>> the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in tr= unk) >>>>> >>>>> " =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0. Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration= from >>>>> TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" >>>>> Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 2178= . >>>>> >>>>> Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job histo= ry >>>>> files are managed >>>>> Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, tho= ugh >>>>> probably will be attacked by different JIRAs >>>>> Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system >>>>> Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be viewe= d from >>>>> a separate server >>>>> Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and frie= nds >>>>> which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >>>>> >>>>> I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from looki= ng at >>>>> the last couple months of 203. >>>>> >>>>> -Todd >>>>> -- >>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> thanks >> mahadev >> @mahadevkonar >> > From general-return-3363-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:00:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0940F3D04 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92420 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92359 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92351 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:00:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:00:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:59:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2494543bwz.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.8.72 with SMTP id g8mr1777088bkg.103.1304557174344; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:59:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.136 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom White Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:59:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSSION] Release rules To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the release manager role (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff605832f@mail.gmail.com%3E). In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it formalizes our practices. I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal (see clarifications in http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d5128d6@mail.gmail.com%3E), then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? These belong together.) Cheers, Tom From general-return-3364-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:11:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A636695D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1912 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:11:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1746 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1738 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:11:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:11:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:11:12 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p451AMih051214 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304557822; bh=6lKNMk6P34U+jTzjd3R2nC52t9tSOaYYNrdGFqVWKS4=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=HSlpdOLM7dzKzWyTFdVrS+owQJGMw9bxQtw2yVR5qDkzTSJ0tkbIVyHYwzzky7ku6 No3pgLG8vfS7El2yUWDwHayQjpan1oT0zYEFIONlyDsuxGQPNFhEW3s22G13F3WOzO 2AhJNmUVDs0uIgUhfwnuogNCuD4Ow7fNxxTEjkNw= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:10:21 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:10:19 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKgWNdu2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9JfwAP8/Kk Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9E7470B34E6Cddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C9E7470B34E6Cddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 based on some single node tests I did (with security ON). On 5/4/11 10:31 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the f= eedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stab= le release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc= 1/ Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen --_000_C9E7470B34E6Cddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3365-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:12:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B75BD986 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3412 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:12:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3365 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3357 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:12:31 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:12:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:12:31 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so2280453iym.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.139.202 with SMTP id f10mr788816ibu.36.1304557950478; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.143.3 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:12:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:12:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm +1 on releasing rc1. The signature and hashes match on the artifact, ran some of the more aggressive MR tests. Reviewed changes from rc0. It looks like we need a FAQ for this release, if only to prevent the same questions from being asked and answered across different threads and lists. Reservations, regressions, and pending work can also be documented there. Right now, Apache Hadoop releases are not recommended by its community. Instead, not only our end users, but other Apache projects run Cloudera's distribution. From all those wearing their Apache hat, I would like to see more effort directed toward a release that we can recommend soon and less time spent compiling tasks to delay it. Releasing this will complicate the documented process. However, that process *has not produced a usable release* for the last two out of six years. This is failure. Entertaining concerns like a one-to-one correspondence between commits and JIRA issues is bizarre in this context. Let's find a way to make progress instead of tossing pharisaic accusations of illegitimacy. -C On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3366-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:19:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C7441000 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11381 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11329 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11321 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:19:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:24 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p451IaQb027338; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:18:36 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:18:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKwluzZkZSDE6qR+WWzMYpk6J2Xw== Message-ID: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Ok. I'll bite. The point of a vote is to learn what everyone thinks. So far we have learne= d: 1 - the team that is trying to contribute code and do a release thinks it i= s ready.=20 2 - Cloudera does not think the release is a good idea.=20 No more talk between the Team contributing code and cloudera will educate u= s further Let's hear from the rest of the community.=20 In parallel on other threads, let's work out how to address concerns. That = will be useful however the vote goes. I promise to continue to work with ev= eryone to help drive releases.=20 We've called a vote, so let it proceed. That is how apache works.=20 Thanks! --- E14 - typing on glass PS this is my last comment on this thread. Start new ones if you are not ca= sting a vote.=20 On May 4, 2011, at 5:45 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > I tend to agree. Changing release model of Apache Hadoop train isn't > something that should be done in a hassle or as a part of release > voting. >=20 > If these questions aren't addressed - let's postpone the vote and > discuss all the complications or implications until they sorted out or > the consensus/compromise is reached. >=20 > Cos >=20 > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 17:39, Eli Collins wrote: >> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't >> change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, >> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. >>=20 >> Ie before we release this we should understand what that means. What >> is being proposed is not just another release from branch-0.20 or >> branch-0.22. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Eli >>=20 >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote= : >>> Eli, >>> I think the intent from the email was to just vote on this thread, >>> which I agree with. >>> Discussions should be done in a separate threads. Hopefully we can >>> all stick to just voting! >>>=20 >>> thanks >>> mahadev >>>=20 >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>> Good suggestion, it would be helpful to hash out the issues around >>>> compatibility, feature branches, version numbers, how to contribute at >>>> Apache before putting up new votes that would be helpful, ie the vote >>>> would go much smoother if all the issues with the previous vote were >>>> addressed before starting a new one. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eli >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Let's stay focused. Let's take the other threads onto other threads. = This is a vote. >>>>>=20 >>>>> To the extent naming is a problem, let's take that to a thread and fi= nd an acceptable proposal. >>>>>=20 >>>>> To the extent folks want to collaborate on certifying the release for= total lack of regression or collaborate on the cleanest possible merge, I = think all interested parties should take these topics to another thread and= divide up the work. >>>>>=20 >>>>> If you've voted, you don't need to comment further on this thread, no= matter what company you work for! >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>>=20 >>>>> --- >>>>> E14 - typing on glass >>>>>=20 >>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:46 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wr= ote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On May 4, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> The list seems highly inaccurate. Checked the first few N/A items.= All >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> false positives. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Also, can you please provide a list on features which are not rela= ted to >>>>>>> gridmix benchmarks or herriot tests? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Here are a few I quickly pulled up: >>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2316 (docs for improved capacity scheduler) >>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2355 (adds new config for heartbeat dampening in MR) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> " BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility= into >>>>>> startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" >>>>>> - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this = feature, >>>>>> where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach= , and >>>>>> it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2364 (important bug fix for localization) >>>>>> - in fact most of localization is different in this branch compared = to trunk >>>>>> due to inclusion of MAPREDUCE-2378, the trunk version of which is st= ill on >>>>>> the "yahoo-merge" branch,. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> "New cunters for FileInput/OutputFormat. New Counter >>>>>> MAP_OUTPUT_MATERIALZIED_BYTES. Related bugs: 4241034, 3418543= , >>>>>> 4217546" >>>>>> - not sure which JIRA this is, I think I've seen a JIRA for trunk, b= ut not >>>>>> committed. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> - MAPREDUCE-1904, committed without JIRA as: >>>>>> " . Reducing new Path(), RawFileStatus() creation overhead in >>>>>> LocalDirAllocator" >>>>>> not in trunk >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> + BZ4101537 . When a queue is built without any access rights we= explain >>>>>> the >>>>>> + problem. (dking, rvw ramach) [attachment of 2010-11-24] >>>>>> seems to be on trunk as MR-2411, but not committed, best I can tell,= despite >>>>>> the JIRA there being resolved (based on looking at QueueManager in t= runk) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> " . Remove unnecessary reference to user configuration from >>>>>> TaskDistributedCacheManager causing memory leaks" >>>>>> Not in trunk, not sure which JIRA it might be.. probably part of 217= 8. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Major new feature: MAPREDUCE-323 - very large rework of how job hist= ory >>>>>> files are managed >>>>>> Major change: MAPREDUCE-1100/MAPREDUCE-1176: unresolved on trunk, th= ough >>>>>> probably will be attacked by different JIRAs >>>>>> Major new ops-visible feature: "metrics2" system >>>>>> Major new ops-visible feature: MAPREDUCE-291 job history can be view= ed from >>>>>> a separate server >>>>>> Major new set of user-visible configurations: MAPREDUCE-1943 and fri= ends >>>>>> which implement new limits in MapReduce (eg MAPREDUCE-1872 as well) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I have code to work on, so I won't keep going, but this is from look= ing at >>>>>> the last couple months of 203. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> -Todd >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> thanks >>> mahadev >>> @mahadevkonar >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3367-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:19:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D26DE3E0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13070 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13025 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13016 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:19:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:19:41 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so757720eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.17.100 with SMTP id i76mr842992eei.67.1304558361545; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:19:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Entertaining concerns like a one-to-one > correspondence between commits and JIRA issues is bizarre in this > context. It's not about whether there's a jira, it's about whether the code was reviewed. We think code should be reviewed and vote on by the community before releasing it. That's how we've always rolled. Everyone agrees releases are too infrequent, that's not an excuse for steam rolling the community. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3368-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:25:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46EA1698 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17794 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17742 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17734 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:25:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:25:02 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so760160ewy.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.50.196 with SMTP id z44mr824894eeb.227.1304558682195; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:24:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Ok. I'll bite. > > The point of a vote is to learn what everyone thinks. So far we have learned: > > 1 - the team that is trying to contribute code and do a release thinks it is ready. > > 2 - Cloudera does not think the release is a good idea. > I don't think that's true. There's a difference between not supporting a given rc and not supporting a release from this branch in general. With both of my hats on, I want code to be reviewed before being release, I want releases to not regress against previous releases, I don't want the next major release to regress against a stable release, I want the community to discuss new version schemes and development models vs adopting them by accident just because we voted on a particular release. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3369-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:25:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F305B6E3 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19430 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:25:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19371 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:25:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19363 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:25:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:25:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:25:05 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so874663ywk.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tKbzi7J8uP1lNFdoqA4VlXFQDvYBIfIyU9LbcSSjDW0=; b=rrV1uzoVZt7pmuA7LLCuXw6UZIQlVVjSsp1nbjdrjgotptyoYCH/mGQeazPH9ClgXm U3ZCDxq4BFo5lez3T/9iikmxbfMyRnVE7XOz8gUY4dO3UNI2/HA2VZrA726vpRQwiNMd w3FAqxum2ArRBJHGygRlwgDubXIyr1MXJ4KSM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BKr3nOvneEFOi4Inbk5pigFHnxa+5/f0YZZqWx1OoATPgkKGxTQ64Q+Mp1Swhk3xYu GizQs+ULu+nyrVarNXvFr1m9mfh6wqDLf7VpI7pD7r7kBshUmfqz9jYOXDSQTWZclxzV fDxjbirRtEhAtxFA7ljBsbdQxSFSIGnGwazEM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.134.20 with SMTP id l20mr1195114ann.5.1304558684066; Wed, 04 May 2011 18:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.4.10 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:24:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:24:43 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WhYIzzCVXgpIaYRljiyjcpVma7Q Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Non-biding -1. I did download it and checked it out, but when I look at the documentation I see it says "Hadoop 0.20 documentation" in the tab on top. From what I can tell this isn't the branch 0.20 so I think it's an error and from a user point of view this looks more like something I would call 0.22 (although yes I understand this is 0.20 +security +whatever). Why would a single company push so hard to go against the "normal" release process just for "the benefit of putting our work in the hands of all hadoop users" is beyond me. It's not like people were begging on the mailing lists to be able to get their hands on such a release to the point where an emergency point release including tons of new features is needed. So to me the more logical reason would be monetary gains, that I would understand better from a for-profit company. But then why go through the hurdles of having such an ASF release when Y! isn't even selling anything remotely related to Hadoop services? And why now? But then there's this spinoff thing and it suddenly makes a lot more sense. E14 said earlier that "That is how apache works." I would say yes, maybe this is how it works, but I'm not sure I want to see it working like _that_. The ASF shouldn't be the vehicle for a single (future) company's wishes. J-D On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3370-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:28:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9397E77B for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23963 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:28:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23919 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:28:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23911 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:28:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:27:54 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=XMXcZv9supBRbam/NxkN4fn28GxlKflXq2ys3TLHcjc7xzFT1fEyKlej uYRiWCGufsfPLcSiEdVQd9WU8Gepu3hRqRVhz61IjVXEKSf04wjNJLuO/ Y0I31XgRvnXJIRz; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304558874; x=1336094874; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2BC4xa/42uaMMEldCICrjkm6+x46fa6tQaa/xsLnQNY=; b=An6J9xPdOHVP1Rjpb1xYe2RGPj4040AP3kDXz2SI+eCTaZHiPhdG6pTY kyFzb/z84XY9/ksvXnHqNrgQgYVrrQlqajo+ssAOrgL2JmdRu86faUteW 7uMrntJypNMGG9b; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,317,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22862744" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:30:57 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKgWNdu2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9JfwAP8/KkAACZ7gA= Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:30:57 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My (non-binding) vote for 0.20.203.0-rc1 is +1. I downloaded, compiled, ran tests, ran my bigrams example, all ran perfectly. (I did a single node test without security on.) The voting criteria I used are: 1. Is this a working release? : Yes 2. Does it take the codebase forward? : Yes 3. Does it have features that the user community might find valuable? : Yes - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/4/11 6:10 PM, "Devaraj Das" wrote: >+1 based on some single node tests I did (with security ON). > > >On 5/4/11 10:31 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the >feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last >stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > >The candidate is at: >http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > >Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > >-- Owen > From general-return-3371-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:57:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E44CF3522 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48793 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48731 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48723 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:57:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:57:06 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEDF768061 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:56:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=o8K7ro00lw7lm14JUSdbP+RBQ6vxxpFgzaYdbIwZqVq6y1vS2KUA 9327QkUQeYydfZLvRCZtr3mg3iSZNP117APxZcKh9uUoak9Vh2OgAD9vM8Ejw3Dd L8Rw06iUayYScVwB/FnsTITXvLZ0it5F8hgqDIqj/wuE2R9F9cDJKpI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=VoGFmmPH0I6KQnbDbYMrb5glrgw=; b=BjiNW3u3aWHiWJKLNEZImTlO+MGl 8sfKwSpyynb2u05ko2PVKaFaFOHA3ZpdfO7xzQTYm/zhChyx3gFzbjKpOBXszaGa 0HGSe2e3d6q0P8EX3oqtZm6GI8cwIKoEVywYJimjJ2LPmU5xa7kwhY7cWKfcR6ws dV5iDiAVEtTJCH4= Received: from [10.134.89.86] (unknown [75.103.10.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4252676805C for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 18:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:56:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority decides to release, then whatever gets released will define the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before trying to vote again. Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a policy discussion because voting is a more efficient means of discovering if the policy really matters. ....Roy From general-return-3372-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 02:13:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13F8B253F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 02:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58888 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:13:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58843 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58835 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 02:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.238] (HELO nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:12:59 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.193] by nm16.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 02:12:38 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.177] by tm6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 02:12:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 02:12:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 692724.18193.bm@omp1060.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 93706 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2011 02:12:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304561558; bh=B/xWcNe8oOLCoKwvxtlXIsnhWMN5+HbqOw1X7F6YaAM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fXvso+6pFXb9YVb2EWFSzcI2JMgVeAxppOA+4+hhXHobjnyGn819kC/hSvPvxGEzzxV6fgMefb2C7uGs/XV7apyxr8L07+Cfa3vHJyQVK17pnNwdXGMocE282H9Pnjed+uIcK7xypLM7LCTXhBnhJny2Yu+nT1EpVnDpnFlkiEg= Message-ID: <551643.49517.qm@web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: etasIvUVM1mqxe5pvAz97H8QCFJxZHwrTWmqese5Q0kP1yJ DeyxlqciFgRIljvrmi0KFd5ZMuO9NcKqXHIrwjK1PKKdWvsUK6qZHudKAYOM yvedJXxrYi5jTGtzj5UqRvnsYDSE8UHp8Q0pvIbwKSrhhmsdiGv_dC9f1QkY sjfV6g9pmXdcvvqyLh9GXZ6v_T7dt_IsP.lc8BnAY3tmeFn.pM8X6XpEbIBM FojMm2dC36mUnYzF.E9wFEfr5hpb8PoXdtJAyeEQEHfnuxgN3S0rD4Cs5jHN .g1ofhGAvSjKH5nwgTUqP2gYVf6fTkO_Ed0aOmWJ0bEFCvFgjCcNJGKplknJ mcGs0k7LHTBCDzj7WJYykW7bPhHyMP6EHxJvs498Uu11p0VTcvMPMNuBvcKL GlKygE.xalvFMBA-- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65511.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:12:38 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:12:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Speculation either on the motives of those objecting to a release or of tho= se making contributions or proposing a release does not advance progress. T= he accusations and counter-accusations seen on this thread are regrettable = and I feel less and less confident in the future of Apache Hadoop as time g= oes on. As a strong believer in and advocate of open source as an answer to= technical and architectural challenges, I am pained to see the members of = what should be a vibrant community litigating in an ultimately self-defeati= ng way. If only this energy put into argument could be channeled into code = or patches...=0A=0AIn open source, if opinions were code we would rule the = world.=0A=0ASo what of this candidate?=0A=0AArtifact looks good, DFS tests = are good, MR tests are good. Looked over some of the documentation and foun= d no errors. To my knowledge this is now a superset of branch-0.20, address= ing the reasonably determined deficit of rc0.=0A=0AThere seems no reason ot= her issues cannot be addressed subsequently.=0A=0AThere has not been a rele= ase of Apache Hadoop 0.20 since at least Feb 6 2010 yet since this time imp= ortant security enhancements have been contributed, but in the form of an A= pache product these are only available as patches on a non-release branch. = Forward progress of the Apache product seems more important than achieving = the perfect release in all eyes.=0A=0AFor example, append features remain o= n a non-release branch. I would really have liked to see the append changes= included in this candidate, but this is not grounds for objection merely r= egret, and I hope this can be covered by a subsequent release, perhaps soon= .=0A=0AAfter security and append features are in 0.20, in my personal humbl= e opinion the 0.20 release in total is sufficient and all attention should = be paid to the next release (0.22 or whatever), except for critical bug fix= es.=0A=0A+1=0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A=A0 =A0 - Andy=0A=0AProblems worthy of = attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A From general-return-3373-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 02:20:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B9452BA5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 02:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72522 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72472 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72464 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 02:20:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:20:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:20:52 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2260227fxm.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JZSSNdZCGYVUv848RwUXDzue2A+y9jBRpZITZ+WaNXU=; b=R6lmth5+hJ/3oWIWtWcfaRqnYrc4PGFp4+Kmi1s8xn+03S1DciO0zJhTq19tAlDObN P1i1OFLWZO5amroqq2GfATNVyPiDNNP/DCGiBJsTI+J0DY4l/Ot8JRS0+Zpqu/RSIy5s 1qXIXn4WLHcROPk5lkqGkXhElsoh0OCySnJ7k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Z05ceWzwO5vx0VsfpUD368L7xZIAlQsiHwTeMOjJ1in0DFu4x5m/SlKwqClVwokzBO h1TN3hm18CocxW/3uH2bUH3Ehng58NHo4dZE8zkuYrS3XV/WNw/zLYuVItQ9C14uZid2 O0LLePofkvq7GCGWGG8uXZMIkBPMaiEIH42lo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.59.92 with SMTP id k28mr2108124fah.27.1304562030754; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.119.131 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:20:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151744874e6e3dc704a27e0470 --00151744874e6e3dc704a27e0470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1. I downloaded the bits, compiled and ran unit tests. Also, looked at the source code to some extent. Looks good. -dhruba On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > > change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > > you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a > release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. > > A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority > decides to release, then whatever gets released will define > the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, > then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before > trying to vote again. > > Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a > policy discussion because voting is a more efficient > means of discovering if the policy really matters. > > ....Roy > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --00151744874e6e3dc704a27e0470-- From general-return-3374-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 02:22:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 087EC2BEB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 02:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76868 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76811 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76803 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 02:22:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:22:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.66] (HELO homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:22:40 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BC343807F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:22:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=xqnKz9MggVzrAT50/Lc4SB/5hWCqJJd7chzRU8inLlPgj3LB7ksV 3sRubRUCfp0KM+p645Pk7aT0jfcEW6AUqoJBCl/LBjG4Ifd2JX94OdmM3lOcT3nA Qzcl+7a4IonS8yGyxc82chDA+f/uFr5fCUqAlLGR15AGLXL2rJ6uE2c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=eeSYhdeRccOmwvKCctpDMdlTHuY=; b=Ekb4AwMdmBwcctXIW0ve10OSx8Vo pmB7RyxegIX2UIUip+7B69diVDBwjrPtv0mrr9XYezGLE5x++SAHpg5NA0l4JBUN Orfu5AyKPD6e2jiCqPTzd2j+MlOx1vkTi+EyMVrDESom3pg+Ju41FH91xv6Mqrm+ 33tCXYNLMuTjHIU= Received: from [10.134.89.86] (unknown [75.103.10.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B9E443807E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:22:18 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 4, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Non-biding -1. > > I did download it and checked it out, but when I look at the > documentation I see it says "Hadoop 0.20 documentation" in the tab on > top. From what I can tell this isn't the branch 0.20 so I think it's > an error and from a user point of view this looks more like something > I would call 0.22 (although yes I understand this is 0.20 +security > +whatever). > > Why would a single company push so hard to go against the "normal" > release process just for "the benefit of putting our work in the hands > of all hadoop users" is beyond me. It's not like people were begging > on the mailing lists to be able to get their hands on such a release > to the point where an emergency point release including tons of new > features is needed. > > So to me the more logical reason would be monetary gains, that I would > understand better from a for-profit company. But then why go through > the hurdles of having such an ASF release when Y! isn't even selling > anything remotely related to Hadoop services? And why now? > > But then there's this spinoff thing and it suddenly makes a lot more sense. > > E14 said earlier that "That is how apache works." > > I would say yes, maybe this is how it works, but I'm not sure I want > to see it working like _that_. The ASF shouldn't be the vehicle for a > single (future) company's wishes. The ASF is a vehicle for whomever wishes to collaborate on a given project. Collaboration means helping do the work. Those who do the work may do so for whatever reasons that they think are good, whether it is because they feel like being charitable today, they get paid a salary and the big boss said "work on this part", or because they just have an itch worth scratching. Apache does not care why people choose to collaborate or how they choose to apply their own intellectual efforts. We welcome all forms of contribution under the terms of our license. What we do require is a certain amount of civility regarding our voting procedures and an emphasis on individual responsibility for your votes. Anyone caught *voting* a particular way just because the boss says so will be dealt with severely. Votes are how we do quality control and make decisions, and no other company can be allowed to make decisions for our non-profit. ....Roy From general-return-3375-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 02:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 148483E5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 02:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91479 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91375 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 02:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91367 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 02:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:40:19 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p452dqes003793 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:39:52 -0700 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:39:51 -0700 Subject: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AcwKw2hV3hkBHc1BTRuS8ErMGgtbtwACkzGG Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9E75C0711858eyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9E75C0711858eyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If we reflect back and see how the development community end up in its curr= ent state for Hadoop. There are development rapidly happening and tested i= n all kind of organizations. However, Hadoop committers are only committin= g code that are interested by the sponsored companies. People are coding d= efensively to ensuring only self serving patches would be committed, and he= lping others and merging problem are always prioritized secondary. While t= he world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is preventing pro= gress from happening. Committers are afraid to commit patches because revi= ew hasn't took place. By the time patch is reviewed, it does not apply pro= perly. People end up having to generate multiple version of patches to ens= ure the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation a= nd reviewed is taking significant toll on the community and progress. Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace wi= th its own fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achi= eve faster improvement with features was due to the ability to use source c= ode repository tools properly. Unfortunate for Yahoo, their source code re= pository was not Apache svn trunk. I applause Owen and Arun's effort for m= en powering and backward/forward porting the changes between yahoo github a= nd Apache svn. There might be some jiras that needs to be merged into Hado= op 0.20.203 branch to ensure the linage is correct. The community should o= ffer to help with detail listing of what is missing rather than vote -1 wit= hout concise reasoning of what is missing. JIRA is meant as a discussion and collaboration tool, but hadoop community = intends to use it as the source code version control system with men powere= d diff maker. While spending time in the incubator with other project, the= mentors have explained that it is not ASF's philosophy to use "review then= commit". Hadoop community should rethink if the community is using the ri= ght tools for the right task. Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and d= evelopers should have the ability to make small incremental changes without= RTC. This will ensure developers help each other rather than policing eac= h other. Any thoughts? Regards, Eric --_000_C9E75C0711858eyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3376-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 03:34:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A3792357 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 03:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14587 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 03:34:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14495 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 03:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14344 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 03:34:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 03:34:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 03:34:40 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1676867qyk.14 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:34:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=SoCYPDsOAk8s02GiBnHaqmv/J1g6LIOkXppI39Httuc=; b=hqRe7ZVMTtUVVQOXupev5JuvU6DQNXV+LU3et91A/xUgpYnpaZgxxecAl/852jAgHd Rjzhnn8M6c4sJMRXKS68jnEOQGBIid/jCOP869YwTWRTVPga8KVd8XnEUPHQHuSSSSVb U5KGsAVEwsnkgc8KQMXCSIl4f2fGX+LVdO+BY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=dSO41OEx7U46e2swZL1PlT8fwb4BFP6EdoZGF61btcqUJzQomDDVBl57qhn1XWF3sD VuiGDHwDXSJd7LhwbtyL/p60ZbOGxSXbq7lMNttNTbZrwXnwyYSEwvb0f9eK/WHxU7cD U2emLNWyPozonXlhyA9pKhWtiv6EGcdcltr9Q= Received: by 10.229.64.233 with SMTP id f41mr1481007qci.130.1304566458600; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.126] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm1448357qcs.35.2011.05.04.20.34.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 May 2011 20:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:34:11 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9234135B-FD91-4E92-B4F5-6E6F7EB38A94@Holsman.NET> References: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org just as a Tally we have 6+1's (andy.. is yours binding?? if so 7) and 3 -1's. so according to the votes so far we are releasing.. but according to our = bylaws.. we need to wait 7 days for everyone to chime in. --I On May 5, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: >=20 >> Non-biding -1. >>=20 >> I did download it and checked it out, but when I look at the >> documentation I see it says "Hadoop 0.20 documentation" in the tab on >> top. =46rom what I can tell this isn't the branch 0.20 so I think = it's >> an error and from a user point of view this looks more like something >> I would call 0.22 (although yes I understand this is 0.20 +security >> +whatever). >>=20 >> Why would a single company push so hard to go against the "normal" >> release process just for "the benefit of putting our work in the = hands >> of all hadoop users" is beyond me. It's not like people were begging >> on the mailing lists to be able to get their hands on such a release >> to the point where an emergency point release including tons of new >> features is needed. >>=20 >> So to me the more logical reason would be monetary gains, that I = would >> understand better from a for-profit company. But then why go through >> the hurdles of having such an ASF release when Y! isn't even selling >> anything remotely related to Hadoop services? And why now? >>=20 >> But then there's this spinoff thing and it suddenly makes a lot more = sense. >>=20 >> E14 said earlier that "That is how apache works." >>=20 >> I would say yes, maybe this is how it works, but I'm not sure I want >> to see it working like _that_. The ASF shouldn't be the vehicle for a >> single (future) company's wishes. >=20 > The ASF is a vehicle for whomever wishes to collaborate on a > given project. Collaboration means helping do the work. Those > who do the work may do so for whatever reasons that they think > are good, whether it is because they feel like being charitable > today, they get paid a salary and the big boss said "work on > this part", or because they just have an itch worth scratching. >=20 > Apache does not care why people choose to collaborate or > how they choose to apply their own intellectual efforts. We > welcome all forms of contribution under the terms of our license. >=20 > What we do require is a certain amount of civility regarding > our voting procedures and an emphasis on individual responsibility > for your votes. Anyone caught *voting* a particular way just > because the boss says so will be dealt with severely. Votes > are how we do quality control and make decisions, and no other > company can be allowed to make decisions for our non-profit. >=20 > ....Roy From general-return-3377-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 04:17:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CDE2CD1 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 04:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38649 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 04:17:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38612 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 04:17:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38604 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 04:17:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:17:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:17:27 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.8] ([71.198.193.36]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LKP002DPFWGSK70@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:17:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-05-04_09:2011-05-04,2011-05-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1105040211 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:17:04 -0700 Message-id: <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I'm really not sure yet how to vote here. I was going to vote +1 for what I was told by a number of Yahoo! committers would be a one time release as Yahoo! "comes back to Apache" after a hiatus last fall/winter and ended their own distribution. Clearly this code was not all developed as a community process, but I was going to support a one time release of what they had developed in exclusion. Then I read Roy's email, which confused me. We would he or I or anyone else support this release setting precedent or policy since it would walk all over our bylaws, community process, and the consensus nature of our foundation? This release vote is a lazy majority of the PMC, but other decisions rolled up in this are supposed to be lazy majority of active committers or, in the case of code changes, a lazy consensus. Setting policy by this release means any sufficiently large group of committers could go off and develop on their own and then commit it to a branch and call a release. Furthermore, it now sounds like this is possibly the first in a line of feature releases off this branch. Bug fixes releases, sure. But feature releases? What's wrong with trunk? Nige On May 4, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't >> change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, >> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a > release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. > > A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority > decides to release, then whatever gets released will define > the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, > then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before > trying to vote again. > > Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a > policy discussion because voting is a more efficient > means of discovering if the policy really matters. > > ....Roy > From general-return-3378-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 04:55:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4322524E9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 04:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53865 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 04:55:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53712 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 04:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53704 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 04:55:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:55:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:55:09 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2649312bwz.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:54:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.19.10 with SMTP id y10mr1827877bka.190.1304571287433; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.37.140 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:54:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:54:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255574062bf1c704a2802c0a --0003255574062bf1c704a2802c0a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -1. As Roy says, "whatever gets released will define the new norm by which policies are assumed", and I certainly don't want this project to change its norms to accommodate bad practices. In particular, Eli presented three very reasonable technical objections to this release. To summarize: 1) Let's get the JIRAs that are going into this release into trunk first. 2) Let's create a JIRA for each issue in the release. 3) Let's stick to the release numbering conventions established for this project. I know the folks at Yahoo! are all professional engineers and done tremendous work to help get the project to this point. There's no doubt in my mind they understand the validity of the above three technical objections. In fact, many of them helped author our "How to Contribute" page, which established these conventions: wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute. We develop new features against trunk, we create JIRAs for each issue, we review code before it goes into trunk, and we only update old releases with bug fixes. I couldn't be more excited to have Yahoo! once again doing development in Apache, and I hope that we can work together to get the work that you've done in this branch into one of our upcoming feature releases. I hope those who voted +1 before Roy clarified what a release vote will mean for future project norms will reconsider their votes. While there may be many competing agendas in this community, we all wish to see Apache Hadoop releases of the highest quality. Changing our norms to allow huge, unreviewed patch sets introducing new features into a past release is a step in the wrong direction. With a little bit of elbow grease, we can get the work done in this branch into trunk, get 0.22 out the door, and be ready for a great 0.23 release. Later, Jeff On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm really not sure yet how to vote here. I was going to vote +1 for what > I was told by a number of Yahoo! committers would be a one time release as > Yahoo! "comes back to Apache" after a hiatus last fall/winter and ended > their own distribution. Clearly this code was not all developed as a > community process, but I was going to support a one time release of what > they had developed in exclusion. > > Then I read Roy's email, which confused me. We would he or I or anyone > else support this release setting precedent or policy since it would walk > all over our bylaws, community process, and the consensus nature of our > foundation? This release vote is a lazy majority of the PMC, but other > decisions rolled up in this are supposed to be lazy majority of active > committers or, in the case of code changes, a lazy consensus. Setting > policy by this release means any sufficiently large group of committers > could go off and develop on their own and then commit it to a branch and > call a release. > > Furthermore, it now sounds like this is possibly the first in a line of > feature releases off this branch. Bug fixes releases, sure. But feature > releases? What's wrong with trunk? > > Nige > > On May 4, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > >> change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > >> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > > > That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a > > release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. > > > > A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority > > decides to release, then whatever gets released will define > > the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, > > then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before > > trying to vote again. > > > > Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a > > policy discussion because voting is a more efficient > > means of discovering if the policy really matters. > > > > ....Roy > > > > --0003255574062bf1c704a2802c0a-- From general-return-3379-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 05:48:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 087472D43 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 05:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87958 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87111 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:48:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87103 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 05:48:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:48:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:47:55 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so2472446iym.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:47:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.58.15 with SMTP id wi15mr374478icb.411.1304574453110; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.213.199 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:47:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:47:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517a9a0dc583404a280e888 --bcaec517a9a0dc583404a280e888 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (non-binding) -1 for similar reasons to what Jeff and others have laid out, and certainly if we're going to change the development process as a side effect of a release vote. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > -1. > > As Roy says, "whatever gets released will define the new norm by which > policies are assumed", and I certainly don't want this project to change > its > norms to accommodate bad practices. In particular, Eli presented three very > reasonable technical objections to this release. To summarize: > > 1) Let's get the JIRAs that are going into this release into trunk first. > 2) Let's create a JIRA for each issue in the release. > 3) Let's stick to the release numbering conventions established for this > project. > > I know the folks at Yahoo! are all professional engineers and done > tremendous work to help get the project to this point. There's no doubt in > my mind they understand the validity of the above three technical > objections. In fact, many of them helped author our "How to Contribute" > page, which established these conventions: > wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute. We develop new features against > trunk, we create JIRAs for each issue, we review code before it goes into > trunk, and we only update old releases with bug fixes. > > I couldn't be more excited to have Yahoo! once again doing development in > Apache, and I hope that we can work together to get the work that you've > done in this branch into one of our upcoming feature releases. > > I hope those who voted +1 before Roy clarified what a release vote will > mean > for future project norms will reconsider their votes. > > While there may be many competing agendas in this community, we all wish to > see Apache Hadoop releases of the highest quality. Changing our norms to > allow huge, unreviewed patch sets introducing new features into a past > release is a step in the wrong direction. > > With a little bit of elbow grease, we can get the work done in this branch > into trunk, get 0.22 out the door, and be ready for a great 0.23 release. > > Later, > Jeff > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > I'm really not sure yet how to vote here. I was going to vote +1 for > what > > I was told by a number of Yahoo! committers would be a one time release > as > > Yahoo! "comes back to Apache" after a hiatus last fall/winter and ended > > their own distribution. Clearly this code was not all developed as a > > community process, but I was going to support a one time release of what > > they had developed in exclusion. > > > > Then I read Roy's email, which confused me. We would he or I or anyone > > else support this release setting precedent or policy since it would walk > > all over our bylaws, community process, and the consensus nature of our > > foundation? This release vote is a lazy majority of the PMC, but other > > decisions rolled up in this are supposed to be lazy majority of active > > committers or, in the case of code changes, a lazy consensus. Setting > > policy by this release means any sufficiently large group of committers > > could go off and develop on their own and then commit it to a branch and > > call a release. > > > > Furthermore, it now sounds like this is possibly the first in a line of > > feature releases off this branch. Bug fixes releases, sure. But feature > > releases? What's wrong with trunk? > > > > Nige > > > > On May 4, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > > > On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > > > >> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't > > >> change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, > > >> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. > > > > > > That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a > > > release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. > > > > > > A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority > > > decides to release, then whatever gets released will define > > > the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, > > > then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before > > > trying to vote again. > > > > > > Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a > > > policy discussion because voting is a more efficient > > > means of discovering if the policy really matters. > > > > > > ....Roy > > > > > > > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --bcaec517a9a0dc583404a280e888-- From general-return-3380-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:21:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CBF52146 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24637 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:21:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24423 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24412 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:21:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:21:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu does not designate 169.229.218.146 as permitted sender) Received: from [169.229.218.146] (HELO cm05fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.218.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:21:36 +0000 Received: from c-67-164-92-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.164.92.113] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by cm05fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (auth plain:matei@eecs.berkeley.edu) (envelope-from ) id 1QHrw1-0007oo-Hz for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:21:14 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Matei Zaharia In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:21:08 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm not going to cast a vote, but I'm concerned about this for the same = reasons Eli brought up -- in particular, compatibility with 0.22. I'm an = author of several patches that have gone into 0.21 and trunk, only to = stay on hiatus for 2 years because the project hasn't made a stable = release since 0.20. (Today, many of these patches are being used through = CDH, which is great, but it would be nice to see them in an Apache = release too.) This push of features into 0.20.203 makes a widely used = 0.22 seem even more distant. Can we at least get a confirmation that = these changes will be included in 0.22, as well as a timeline? To support a vibrant developer community, Apache Hadoop should not just = be a mechanism for Yahoo and Cloudera to publish patches. It should = include a well-defined process for smaller third-party contributors to = push changes that will make it into a stable release within a reasonable = time horizon. The lack of such a process has been a major cause for the = slowdown in the project in my perspective. Matei On May 4, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > (non-binding) -1 for similar reasons to what Jeff and others have laid = out, > and certainly if we're going to change the development process as a = side > effect of a release vote. >=20 > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher = wrote: >=20 >> -1. >>=20 >> As Roy says, "whatever gets released will define the new norm by = which >> policies are assumed", and I certainly don't want this project to = change >> its >> norms to accommodate bad practices. In particular, Eli presented = three very >> reasonable technical objections to this release. To summarize: >>=20 >> 1) Let's get the JIRAs that are going into this release into trunk = first. >> 2) Let's create a JIRA for each issue in the release. >> 3) Let's stick to the release numbering conventions established for = this >> project. >>=20 >> I know the folks at Yahoo! are all professional engineers and done >> tremendous work to help get the project to this point. There's no = doubt in >> my mind they understand the validity of the above three technical >> objections. In fact, many of them helped author our "How to = Contribute" >> page, which established these conventions: >> wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute. We develop new features = against >> trunk, we create JIRAs for each issue, we review code before it goes = into >> trunk, and we only update old releases with bug fixes. >>=20 >> I couldn't be more excited to have Yahoo! once again doing = development in >> Apache, and I hope that we can work together to get the work that = you've >> done in this branch into one of our upcoming feature releases. >>=20 >> I hope those who voted +1 before Roy clarified what a release vote = will >> mean >> for future project norms will reconsider their votes. >>=20 >> While there may be many competing agendas in this community, we all = wish to >> see Apache Hadoop releases of the highest quality. Changing our norms = to >> allow huge, unreviewed patch sets introducing new features into a = past >> release is a step in the wrong direction. >>=20 >> With a little bit of elbow grease, we can get the work done in this = branch >> into trunk, get 0.22 out the door, and be ready for a great 0.23 = release. >>=20 >> Later, >> Jeff >>=20 >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm really not sure yet how to vote here. I was going to vote +1 = for >> what >>> I was told by a number of Yahoo! committers would be a one time = release >> as >>> Yahoo! "comes back to Apache" after a hiatus last fall/winter and = ended >>> their own distribution. Clearly this code was not all developed as = a >>> community process, but I was going to support a one time release of = what >>> they had developed in exclusion. >>>=20 >>> Then I read Roy's email, which confused me. We would he or I or = anyone >>> else support this release setting precedent or policy since it would = walk >>> all over our bylaws, community process, and the consensus nature of = our >>> foundation? This release vote is a lazy majority of the PMC, but = other >>> decisions rolled up in this are supposed to be lazy majority of = active >>> committers or, in the case of code changes, a lazy consensus. = Setting >>> policy by this release means any sufficiently large group of = committers >>> could go off and develop on their own and then commit it to a branch = and >>> call a release. >>>=20 >>> Furthermore, it now sounds like this is possibly the first in a line = of >>> feature releases off this branch. Bug fixes releases, sure. But = feature >>> releases? What's wrong with trunk? >>>=20 >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On May 4, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you = don't >>>>> change your development and release model on a release VOTE = thread, >>>>> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. >>>>=20 >>>> That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a >>>> release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. >>>>=20 >>>> A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority >>>> decides to release, then whatever gets released will define >>>> the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, >>>> then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before >>>> trying to vote again. >>>>=20 >>>> Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a >>>> policy discussion because voting is a more efficient >>>> means of discovering if the policy really matters. >>>>=20 >>>> ....Roy >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-3381-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:31:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AB232D08 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40422 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40385 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40377 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:31:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:31:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:31:51 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so819859eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.17.100 with SMTP id i76mr961383eei.67.1304577089659; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:31:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > If we reflect back and see how the development community end up in its cu= rrent state for Hadoop. =A0There are development rapidly happening and test= ed in all kind of organizations. =A0However, Hadoop committers are only com= mitting code that are interested by the sponsored companies. =A0People are = coding defensively to ensuring only self serving patches would be committed= , and helping others and merging problem are always prioritized secondary. = =A0While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is prev= enting progress from happening. =A0Committers are afraid to commit patches = because review hasn't took place. =A0By the time patch is reviewed, it does= not apply properly. =A0People end up having to generate multiple version o= f patches to ensure the code can be applied. =A0The large lag time between = patch generation and reviewed is taking significant toll on the community a= nd progress. > > Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace = with its own fork of the source code. =A0The reason that Yahoo was able to = achieve faster improvement with features was due to the ability to use sour= ce code repository tools properly. =A0Unfortunate for Yahoo, their source c= ode repository was not Apache svn trunk. =A0I applause Owen and Arun's effo= rt for men powering and backward/forward porting the changes between yahoo = github and Apache svn. =A0There might be some jiras that needs to be merged= into Hadoop 0.20.203 branch to ensure the linage is correct. =A0The commun= ity should offer to help with detail listing of what is missing rather than= vote -1 without concise reasoning of what is missing. > > JIRA is meant as a discussion and collaboration tool, but hadoop communit= y intends to use it as the source code version control system with men powe= red diff maker. =A0While spending time in the incubator with other project,= the mentors have explained that it is not ASF's philosophy to use "review = then commit". ASF's policy is that projects make this decision for themselves: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-creation.html The Hadoop bylaws specify that code changes are lazy consensus, ie you need a +1 from a committer. Technically the code doesn't have to be reviewed before committing it, that's just been the norm. I don't think jira is technically required either, it's just been the norm. The vote for the patch has to happen on the lists, that happens as a side effect of jira traffic going to the dev lists. > Hadoop community should rethink if the community is using the right tools= for the right task. > > Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and= developers should have the ability to make small incremental changes witho= ut RTC. =A0This will ensure developers help each other rather than policing= each other. > > Any thoughts? > I think you can move quickly with RTC or CTR, I've worked on RTC projects that have moved quickly. It requires people dedicate bandwidth to reviewing changes. If you do want all your code reviewed (at some point) then you're ultimately limited by review bandwidth, with either RTC or CTR. The time it takes to file a jira is normally insignificant compared to the time to create and test a change. The idea with using jira is that you propose/discuss a change before creating code. You could do that on the lists too. I agree using just a code review tool for small stuff would be faster, eg things that don't require a bug #, release note, etc. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3382-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:32:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 266A021F8 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42667 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:32:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42594 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:32:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42586 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:32:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:32:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:32:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c66.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.66]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p456W7bJ015778 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304577128; bh=cERPNIzrrDZfZ+c4ycQEyiimIfcrml3S8rg621pP64k=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=IZWJpShNohLfzi86zclxGlTRr+6tbK2zKbQIZiP7xqxfPrU+rV9NfhmP5HBAYQ+6y lOHQysUho+KnyQDldu/QG27iLTfkYCdTjd4qko0U7Gh+IVq2xLUBb+JnZtFYao0U3U 2ZmNIbzRJm4zvj04es4t7LmyFdxOi7eFgukkzQAU= Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:32:06 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 downloaded, built, deployed on one node cluster. sanjay On May 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've > incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from > 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse- > plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, > I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3383-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:41:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BA8E2BCD for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57478 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57428 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57420 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:41:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:41:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:41:09 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so821781eya.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:40:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.46.214 with SMTP id r62mr905896eeb.99.1304577648574; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: > One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the > release manager role > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff605832f@mail.gmail.com%3E). > In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this > discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it > formalizes our practices. > > I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal > (see clarifications in > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d5128d6@mail.gmail.com%3E), > then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. > (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? > These belong together.) Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote. I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it: http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html Thanks, Eli From general-return-3384-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:50:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFA362201 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69003 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:50:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68950 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:50:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68942 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:50:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:50:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.243.76.15] (HELO Exchg-FE01.marklogic.com) (216.243.76.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:50:17 +0000 Received: from exchg-be.marklogic.com ([fe80::cdc9:46e4:439b:bc0e]) by Exchg-FE01.marklogic.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:49:56 -0700 From: Jane Chen To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:49:22 -0700 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwK7KbUFUkVmeFCT9yPXrcqLvxjpAAAtGvQ Message-ID: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <79A1AED5-9005-4F58-BFDB-F7394CB2A69C@gbiv.com> <89EC003F-E125-44C5-932C-2157A307CFD6@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Agree. As a new comer, I had trouble figuring out which version to adopt -= - 0.20.2 vs. 0.21. This new release candidate seems to add more confusion t= o general users. Jane -----Original Message----- From: Matei Zaharia [mailto:matei@eecs.berkeley.edu]=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 11:21 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 I'm not going to cast a vote, but I'm concerned about this for the same rea= sons Eli brought up -- in particular, compatibility with 0.22. I'm an autho= r of several patches that have gone into 0.21 and trunk, only to stay on hi= atus for 2 years because the project hasn't made a stable release since 0.2= 0. (Today, many of these patches are being used through CDH, which is great= , but it would be nice to see them in an Apache release too.) This push of = features into 0.20.203 makes a widely used 0.22 seem even more distant. Can= we at least get a confirmation that these changes will be included in 0.22= , as well as a timeline? To support a vibrant developer community, Apache Hadoop should not just be = a mechanism for Yahoo and Cloudera to publish patches. It should include a = well-defined process for smaller third-party contributors to push changes t= hat will make it into a stable release within a reasonable time horizon. Th= e lack of such a process has been a major cause for the slowdown in the pro= ject in my perspective. Matei On May 4, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > (non-binding) -1 for similar reasons to what Jeff and others have laid ou= t, > and certainly if we're going to change the development process as a side > effect of a release vote. >=20 > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wr= ote: >=20 >> -1. >>=20 >> As Roy says, "whatever gets released will define the new norm by which >> policies are assumed", and I certainly don't want this project to change >> its >> norms to accommodate bad practices. In particular, Eli presented three v= ery >> reasonable technical objections to this release. To summarize: >>=20 >> 1) Let's get the JIRAs that are going into this release into trunk first= . >> 2) Let's create a JIRA for each issue in the release. >> 3) Let's stick to the release numbering conventions established for this >> project. >>=20 >> I know the folks at Yahoo! are all professional engineers and done >> tremendous work to help get the project to this point. There's no doubt = in >> my mind they understand the validity of the above three technical >> objections. In fact, many of them helped author our "How to Contribute" >> page, which established these conventions: >> wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute. We develop new features against >> trunk, we create JIRAs for each issue, we review code before it goes int= o >> trunk, and we only update old releases with bug fixes. >>=20 >> I couldn't be more excited to have Yahoo! once again doing development i= n >> Apache, and I hope that we can work together to get the work that you've >> done in this branch into one of our upcoming feature releases. >>=20 >> I hope those who voted +1 before Roy clarified what a release vote will >> mean >> for future project norms will reconsider their votes. >>=20 >> While there may be many competing agendas in this community, we all wish= to >> see Apache Hadoop releases of the highest quality. Changing our norms to >> allow huge, unreviewed patch sets introducing new features into a past >> release is a step in the wrong direction. >>=20 >> With a little bit of elbow grease, we can get the work done in this bran= ch >> into trunk, get 0.22 out the door, and be ready for a great 0.23 release= . >>=20 >> Later, >> Jeff >>=20 >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm really not sure yet how to vote here. I was going to vote +1 for >> what >>> I was told by a number of Yahoo! committers would be a one time release >> as >>> Yahoo! "comes back to Apache" after a hiatus last fall/winter and ended >>> their own distribution. Clearly this code was not all developed as a >>> community process, but I was going to support a one time release of wha= t >>> they had developed in exclusion. >>>=20 >>> Then I read Roy's email, which confused me. We would he or I or anyone >>> else support this release setting precedent or policy since it would wa= lk >>> all over our bylaws, community process, and the consensus nature of our >>> foundation? This release vote is a lazy majority of the PMC, but other >>> decisions rolled up in this are supposed to be lazy majority of active >>> committers or, in the case of code changes, a lazy consensus. Setting >>> policy by this release means any sufficiently large group of committers >>> could go off and develop on their own and then commit it to a branch an= d >>> call a release. >>>=20 >>> Furthermore, it now sounds like this is possibly the first in a line of >>> feature releases off this branch. Bug fixes releases, sure. But featu= re >>> releases? What's wrong with trunk? >>>=20 >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On May 4, 2011, at 6:56 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On May 4, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> The point is that these discussion should be sorted out, ie you don't >>>>> change your development and release model on a release VOTE thread, >>>>> you change it on a DISCUSSION thread. >>>>=20 >>>> That is no different than saying you have a right to veto a >>>> release until the issue is addressed, which you don't have. >>>>=20 >>>> A release vote is a majority decision. If the majority >>>> decides to release, then whatever gets released will define >>>> the new norm by which policies are assumed. If not released, >>>> then I suggest collaborating more on the policies before >>>> trying to vote again. >>>>=20 >>>> Either way, we don't hold up a vote for the sake of a >>>> policy discussion because voting is a more efficient >>>> means of discovering if the policy really matters. >>>>=20 >>>> ....Roy >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-3385-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:53:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDBA82252 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73125 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:53:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73082 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73070 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:53:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:53:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:52:56 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so941130yxd.35 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:52:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pemoyu0QFBiafh+KxJrXqspUhGGXJXpEeESX9qHZo5k=; b=P0nW4/Mtg2ZkGylh698skYHwEa8vBqwfRF+bfcfyGDmWqCVkedjgMxJcW4LKFAWY84 kqRxw37nxbsLnIRqiGkPeJcWXGtWb8lqhprmYA1+48RENKLlGb8YG+8Vu8nv/YiPToMf Jc0QIE4LILg6YqexcigOqGD265iseNTbCHLvs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UtQb6GHyrI6+o2RwQp7AmDYOhwQWBeptlEefj8d1Dw4VPkVOk1IslQPW/P8qgKIbI6 OUajMF5OTOfZ20/q39dH1Tey/Yz5DNVIR3lhTGgQh78fmPmJuMTcujHsLyit4Bhx6iQB eSiBLJNH0Hbm9WyQstxF2bcnaZHmjrhaV+zCw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.134.20 with SMTP id l20mr1329381ann.5.1304578355113; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.4.10 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:52:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> References: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:52:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vcod_Y3urTf5YAYqYpbJHXT4H-E Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roy, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > The ASF is a vehicle for whomever wishes to collaborate on a > given project. =A0Collaboration means helping do the work. =A0Those > who do the work may do so for whatever reasons that they think > are good, whether it is because they feel like being charitable > today, they get paid a salary and the big boss said "work on > this part", or because they just have an itch worth scratching. > > Apache does not care why people choose to collaborate or > how they choose to apply their own intellectual efforts. =A0We > welcome all forms of contribution under the terms of our license. I don't think I was arguing against the contribution of the code in that branch, it's very welcome, but I'm questioning (and ranting about) the motivation for releasing a version that even just by name is a weird hulla-hoop around the usual development practices that Hadoop has had in the past (not that it's set in stone). So I wanted to contribute my negative non-binding vote to highlight that this release is probably very confusing for the general user. This is 0.20, but it's not. Also it has more numbers, and it starts at 203. Why doing this at all instead of just moving on with 0.22? Or is 0.22 bound to be like 0.21? It almost begs the question if this should be called 0.22.0 then. > > What we do require is a certain amount of civility regarding > our voting procedures and an emphasis on individual responsibility > for your votes. =A0Anyone caught *voting* a particular way just > because the boss says so will be dealt with severely. =A0Votes > are how we do quality control and make decisions, and no other > company can be allowed to make decisions for our non-profit. Yeah I don't think that's a problem here, everyone seem to have their very own strong opinions. From general-return-3386-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 09:58:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF7BE2C7D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 09:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72160 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 09:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72090 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 09:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65696 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 09:52:02 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tvalderrama@tuenti.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuenti.com; s=corp; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Pse/nqpWTyVi8eXWYRU98wr9i0G+boceclJR76kAg78=; b=jzU6LWQ27gYW+GWrFcnpRzBb/Os0iLHwVWwad4VWfpwrV1kI5W/fkrwHc4LbcVDEqF oOrVpoZsyfEdhs3eWGTY/HgcIstDYb33bg6HZyipoQ0TIfgCStIDMAjcCd2h+/aSA4j5 0cGPyZhVmmffp/GrABBuEm3C6GS0qT2E0BT0Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=tuenti.com; s=corp; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YVarVi4pvvzahqovcQGQQLutMVkt4ySlaOijhMHTtmqhiepZvpmp+PuA6Afny2FmTz P272LzfrHBrYciqx4wNIG5L3Vi1wdwgOFOa2DJ4aOt94qa1AIqPhNclPRSokbzWfznn9 bST5X0AedypJoMIKWh4ZqN8Hjd59Qic3rGBJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:51:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop From: Tony Valderrama To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I just wanted to drop in a few thoughts from a new developer working outside of the Hadoop developer community. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is preventing progress > from happening. People end up having to generate multiple version of patches to ensure > the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation and reviewed > is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace with its own > fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achieve faster improvement with > features was due to the ability to use source code repository tools properly. Unfortunate > for Yahoo, their source code repository was not Apache svn trunk. I agree that the review process is broken. However, the current situation is exactly the result of a lack of adherence to this and other processes. Various subgroups within the community have (intentionally or unintentionally) hijacked the project at different times by avoiding community processes in the interest of agility or commercial benefit, and the result is a highly fragmented project with no clear direction. >From the outside, Hadoop looks like a Yahoo/Cloudera project which occasionally gets an Apache stamp. Given the lack of adherence to processes, as a non-Yahoo/Cloudera developer I have no way of breaking into the development community. Who's going to review or commit patches I submit? And which of the myriad versions should I even be trying to patch against? And given the speed with which undocumented changes are being made, how am I supposed to figure out if my changes are going to be relevant or viable next week? We'd love to contribute back, but it's just not clear that we or other small players have any place within the Hadoop developer community. Here at Tuenti, like various other small-to-midsize Hadoop users, we've just forked 0.20 and devoted a couple of developers to maintaining features that we need. It would be nice to have shiny new features in the Yahoo branch or the Facebook branch or the Cloudera branch or the 0.22 branch (does Hadoop even have a trunk at the moment?), but we'll favor our own stable and familiar branch over the risky and hefty investment required to adopt a branch without clear community support. > Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and developers > should have the ability to make small incremental changes without RTC. This will ensure developers > help each other rather than policing each other. As an outsider, JIRA is the only way I've been able to follow the changes to Hadoop's code and guess where the project is heading. Permitting developers to commit without review or documentation will just further exclude anyone who can't walk down the hall and knock on an office door to ask about a commit. Of course, take this with a grain of salt, since I don't claim to be a part of the Hadoop developer community and I don't forsee Tuenti ever playing a major role in the developer community. ~Tony From general-return-3387-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 11:36:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4C952058 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12437 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12396 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12388 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 11:36:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:36:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:35:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACD51BA8FD for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:35:34 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id V3l1JJv1GK+F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:35:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434D71BAA23 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:35:33 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305200122.23674@pIZMjsiymTh5AqvAudcm9g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p45BZLCB013103 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:35:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 12:35:21 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p45BZLCB013103 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 05/05/11 10:51, Tony Valderrama wrote: > Hi, I just wanted to drop in a few thoughts from a new developer > working outside of the Hadoop developer community. > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is preventing progress >> from happening. People end up having to generate multiple version of patches to ensure >> the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation and reviewed >> is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > >> Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace with its own >> fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achieve faster improvement with >> features was due to the ability to use source code repository tools properly. Unfortunate >> for Yahoo, their source code repository was not Apache svn trunk. > > I agree that the review process is broken. However, the current > situation is exactly the result of a lack of adherence to this and > other processes. Various subgroups within the community have > (intentionally or unintentionally) hijacked the project at different > times by avoiding community processes in the interest of agility or > commercial benefit, and the result is a highly fragmented project with > no clear direction. > > From the outside, Hadoop looks like a Yahoo/Cloudera project which > occasionally gets an Apache stamp. Given the lack of adherence to > processes, as a non-Yahoo/Cloudera developer I have no way of breaking > into the development community. Who's going to review or commit > patches I submit? And which of the myriad versions should I even be > trying to patch against? And given the speed with which undocumented > changes are being made, how am I supposed to figure out if my changes > are going to be relevant or viable next week? We'd love to contribute > back, but it's just not clear that we or other small players have any > place within the Hadoop developer community. As someone who has commit rights but undercommits, here are my issues -I am not full time on hadoop, I have little time to keep my own code up to date, let alone review patches -I am not fully up to date with all the changes or subtleties in what is a big, complicated system -I don't want to break the big systems (Y!, Facebook) by introducing changes that work on my network and my (small, dynamic) clusters but which place limitations on scale. It's why I prefer review by those people who do work on large scale projects. > >> Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and developers >> should have the ability to make small incremental changes without RTC. This will ensure developers >> help each other rather than policing each other. > > As an outsider, JIRA is the only way I've been able to follow the > changes to Hadoop's code and guess where the project is heading. > Permitting developers to commit without review or documentation will > just further exclude anyone who can't walk down the hall and knock on > an office door to ask about a commit. I've worked in other ASF projects (Axis) where some large dev teams (IBM) used to make decisions in team meetings and propagate them. It's faster, but less community centric, and when a large dev team (IBM) get re-assigned internally everyone is left not just scrambling to catch up engineering-wise, but also to make sense of big chunks of under-documented code. At least the JIRA-based review process not only provides a discussion log, Hudson/Jenkins checks that there are tests, no extra warnings, etc. What could be interesting would be -a move to Git to make it easier to pull in patches from other branches, and for people like Tony to have their own fork under SCM. -adoption of Gerrit for having each JIRA issue move from being a patch to a branch (local or remote), so that people can develop the code for an issue, others can pull it in and merge it, and so that the issue tracks live code, not dead patches -more testing of trunk in bigger real/virtual clusters I don't know how we can do this, I'd love to hear about experiences others have with such a process. From general-return-3388-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:19:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1034B297D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68150 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:19:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68095 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:19:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68085 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:19:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:19:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.220] (HELO nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:19:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.188] by nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 16:18:55 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.135] by tm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 16:18:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 16:18:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 777673.97233.bm@omp1018.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 28246 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2011 16:18:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304612335; bh=CIrd4rM+rvXusqowN1gTztGpf6vqBtcYvabNQA3ai40=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zCNMzMYxjaiAcXP1kabAf84xVH6bTRuGwD4kGzGZoWMoEZfHKUa9S34a1BWzcKc/+6GdyFqwpUad/SGMUeIMWJRUqHGFH5tzd/dySJgOF/ss0VHkFrP2zj6nEOGrar2CjzBaQMR7Sm2EEkbQTRRVLH5YCNQO5P90UO+uQGQjpCg= Message-ID: <142245.88843.qm@web65502.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: z9Vf8jcVM1l4fP7MWsoztO2xcIWgOhFHyN_tmZrWx2Dxe0Z 3V_gdQV_cXNbQ1xHyHyPVsxxpIhZaX0cYy0Vx_7DmgSuqHh4BRtLrOqzYjFO TPf6YqOzIC7csFy.dXT80fKd6nzPr6g_JCs6KhK12yQeRVtqUScEc5HyUysQ McBIKjxsZ0UX.LqNEyLuQQr1.V5mDWvJYkO4GOjqMZKyigcmh2rwlkxK9AIT YM5EBsTdnzyTbPOGhUrZFtrbCqfAzTigla6HZgtHj9KKOq4zKrUX8lcp6vfp .kZW_YyKv6YDcaOFZQ7pB4Oca048zoaRi8QGRwXf2F44H2S2NWQ64m09KmoL LEG7vBDTIBy_WE5woH0dewTELjIPkW1eDECAodwvBAOqnzPfGMUzeNBgWfG1 t7PpP5v.Ynrah Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65502.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 09:18:55 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:18:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9234135B-FD91-4E92-B4F5-6E6F7EB38A94@Holsman.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Non binding. - Andy --- On Wed, 5/4/11, Ian Holsman wrote: > just as a Tally we have > 6+1's (andy.. is yours binding?? if so 7) > and 3 -1's. > > so according to the votes so far we are releasing.. but > according to our bylaws.. we need to wait 7 days for > everyone to chime in. > > --I From general-return-3389-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:37:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B1AE22BC for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1298 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:37:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1250 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1242 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:37:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:37:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:37:07 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so1536733pwi.35 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.47.231 with SMTP id g7mr3463611pbn.203.1304613405039; Thu, 05 May 2011 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.230 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 09:36:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:36:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C9eoC3_QLeaLbY0rmxGzxZW2y44 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the >> release manager role >> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff605832f@mail.gmail.com%3E). >> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this >> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it >> formalizes our practices. >> >> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal >> (see clarifications in >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d5128d6@mail.gmail.com%3E), >> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. >> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? >> These belong together.) > > Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing > should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may > needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote. > > I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it: > http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html +1 makes sense. > > Thanks, > Eli > From general-return-3390-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:03:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEAE3241E for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58261 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:03:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58213 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58205 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:03:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:03:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:03:12 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p45H2Jga000424 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:02:19 -0700 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:02:16 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AcwK7jErYGHl3b7MQomaUu3VtVwVUQAV/5e9 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9E82628118A1eyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9E82628118A1eyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Instead of depending on review then commit practice being the norm, Hadoop= committers can probably take advantage of the svn jira plugin. People can= actively commit to svn as long as a jira number is reference in the commit= . The commit message will show up in JIRA and leave a trail of activities = for reference. Future committers can refer back to the code history to see= why the code is written the way it did. It is less error prone to maintai= n patch increments. This seems like a solvable problem by tweaking the beh= aviors of the hadoop committers. Regards, Eric On 5/4/11 11:31 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > If we reflect back and see how the development community end up in its cu= rrent state for Hadoop. There are development rapidly happening and tested= in all kind of organizations. However, Hadoop committers are only committ= ing code that are interested by the sponsored companies. People are coding= defensively to ensuring only self serving patches would be committed, and = helping others and merging problem are always prioritized secondary. While= the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is preventing p= rogress from happening. Committers are afraid to commit patches because re= view hasn't took place. By the time patch is reviewed, it does not apply p= roperly. People end up having to generate multiple version of patches to e= nsure the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation= and reviewed is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > > Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace = with its own fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to ac= hieve faster improvement with features was due to the ability to use source= code repository tools properly. Unfortunate for Yahoo, their source code = repository was not Apache svn trunk. I applause Owen and Arun's effort for= men powering and backward/forward porting the changes between yahoo github= and Apache svn. There might be some jiras that needs to be merged into Ha= doop 0.20.203 branch to ensure the linage is correct. The community should= offer to help with detail listing of what is missing rather than vote -1 w= ithout concise reasoning of what is missing. > > JIRA is meant as a discussion and collaboration tool, but hadoop communit= y intends to use it as the source code version control system with men powe= red diff maker. While spending time in the incubator with other project, t= he mentors have explained that it is not ASF's philosophy to use "review th= en commit". ASF's policy is that projects make this decision for themselves: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-creation.html The Hadoop bylaws specify that code changes are lazy consensus, ie you need a +1 from a committer. Technically the code doesn't have to be reviewed before committing it, that's just been the norm. I don't think jira is technically required either, it's just been the norm. The vote for the patch has to happen on the lists, that happens as a side effect of jira traffic going to the dev lists. > Hadoop community should rethink if the community is using the right tools= for the right task. > > Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and= developers should have the ability to make small incremental changes witho= ut RTC. This will ensure developers help each other rather than policing e= ach other. > > Any thoughts? > I think you can move quickly with RTC or CTR, I've worked on RTC projects that have moved quickly. It requires people dedicate bandwidth to reviewing changes. If you do want all your code reviewed (at some point) then you're ultimately limited by review bandwidth, with either RTC or CTR. The time it takes to file a jira is normally insignificant compared to the time to create and test a change. The idea with using jira is that you propose/discuss a change before creating code. You could do that on the lists too. I agree using just a code review tool for small stuff would be faster, eg things that don't require a bug #, release note, etc. Thanks, Eli --_000_C9E82628118A1eyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3391-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:12:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34ABF2C99 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74044 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:12:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73991 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73983 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:12:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:12:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:12:41 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p45HC2gD045217 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:02 -0700 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AcwLCySHr3U6SykjQSOV1rSGZbb/+wAPGezI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9E82871118A5eyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C9E82871118A5eyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The by-law of +1 from committers is probably the less barrier that Apache c= ould make, to prevent people putting in stuff that might not be compatible = with Apache license. I also agree that making a working trunk is probably = the most important priority for Hadoop. Once the trunk is working, it will= be much easier for Hadoop to grow new developers. Regards, Eric On 5/5/11 2:51 AM, "Tony Valderrama" wrote: Hi, I just wanted to drop in a few thoughts from a new developer working outside of the Hadoop developer community. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is preve= nting progress > from happening. People end up having to generate multiple version of pat= ches to ensure > the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation and= reviewed > is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace = with its own > fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achieve faste= r improvement with > features was due to the ability to use source code repository tools prope= rly. Unfortunate > for Yahoo, their source code repository was not Apache svn trunk. I agree that the review process is broken. However, the current situation is exactly the result of a lack of adherence to this and other processes. Various subgroups within the community have (intentionally or unintentionally) hijacked the project at different times by avoiding community processes in the interest of agility or commercial benefit, and the result is a highly fragmented project with no clear direction. >From the outside, Hadoop looks like a Yahoo/Cloudera project which occasionally gets an Apache stamp. Given the lack of adherence to processes, as a non-Yahoo/Cloudera developer I have no way of breaking into the development community. Who's going to review or commit patches I submit? And which of the myriad versions should I even be trying to patch against? And given the speed with which undocumented changes are being made, how am I supposed to figure out if my changes are going to be relevant or viable next week? We'd love to contribute back, but it's just not clear that we or other small players have any place within the Hadoop developer community. Here at Tuenti, like various other small-to-midsize Hadoop users, we've just forked 0.20 and devoted a couple of developers to maintaining features that we need. It would be nice to have shiny new features in the Yahoo branch or the Facebook branch or the Cloudera branch or the 0.22 branch (does Hadoop even have a trunk at the moment?), but we'll favor our own stable and familiar branch over the risky and hefty investment required to adopt a branch without clear community support. > Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, and= developers > should have the ability to make small incremental changes without RTC. T= his will ensure developers > help each other rather than policing each other. As an outsider, JIRA is the only way I've been able to follow the changes to Hadoop's code and guess where the project is heading. Permitting developers to commit without review or documentation will just further exclude anyone who can't walk down the hall and knock on an office door to ask about a commit. Of course, take this with a grain of salt, since I don't claim to be a part of the Hadoop developer community and I don't forsee Tuenti ever playing a major role in the developer community. ~Tony --_000_C9E82871118A5eyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3392-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:24:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71A38261F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98380 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:24:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98317 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98274 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:24:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:24:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:24:32 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanaghi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QI2HY-0006lp-HR for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:24:08 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: 32 days left to Berlin Buzzwords Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:15:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2720268.oGGqCYLffK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105051915.22361.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart2720268.oGGqCYLffK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hey folks, BerlinBuzzwords 2011 is close only 32 days left until the big Search, Store and Scale opensource crowd is gathering in Berlin on June 6th/7th. The conference again focuses on the topics search, data analysis and NoSQL. It is to take place on June 6/7th 2011 in Berlin. We are looking forward to two awesome keynote speakers who shaped the world of open source data analysis: Doug Cutting, founder of Apache Lucene and Hadoop) as well as Ted Dunning (Chief Application Architect at MapR Technologies and active developer at Apache Hadoop and Mahout). We are amazed by the amount and quality of the talk submissions we got. As a result this year we have added one more track to the main conference. If you haven't done so already, make sure to book your ticket now - early bird tickets are already sold out since April 7th and there might not be many tickets left. As we would like to give visitors of our main conference a reason to stay in town for the whole week, we have been talking to local co-working spaces and companies asking them for free space and WiFi to host Hackathons right after the main conference - that is on June 8th through 10th. If you would like to gather with fellow developers and users of your project, fix bugs together, hack on new features or give users a hands-on introduction to your tools, please submit your workshop proposal to our wiki: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/node/428 Please note that slots are assigned on a first come first serve basis. We are doing our best to get you connected, however space is limited. The deal is simple: We get you in touch with a conference room provider. Your event gets promoted in our schedule. Co-Ordination however is completely up to you: Make sure to provide an interesting abstract, provide a Hackathon registration area - see the Barcamp page for a good example: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/barcamp Attending Hackathons requires a Berlin Buzzwords ticket and (then free) registration at the Hackathon in question. Hope I see you all around in Berlin, Isabel --nextPart2720268.oGGqCYLffK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3C2yoACgkQPJpCBAwIhbQvMgCdG1fvGGo8H2/PMe3bQTe3+Lls wwsAnjB546uJIugKAO+VlKTnQg1qIAvP =rQoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2720268.oGGqCYLffK-- From general-return-3393-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:33:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEBC82782 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19764 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:33:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19675 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19659 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:33:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:33:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:32:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p45HWB85011731 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:32:11 -0700 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:32:10 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AcwLGKaaUWvmZ/WsQD6X0QVZUYVB5gAMbY8W Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9E82D2A118ADeyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9E82D2A118ADeyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. Howeve= r, it will only work if the entire community is willing to move to git. Ma= intaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that we are paying i= n full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the source control.= What do people think about fully adopting git instead of svn? Regards, Eric On 5/5/11 4:35 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: On 05/05/11 10:51, Tony Valderrama wrote: > Hi, I just wanted to drop in a few thoughts from a new developer > working outside of the Hadoop developer community. > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is prev= enting progress >> from happening. People end up having to generate multiple version of pa= tches to ensure >> the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation an= d reviewed >> is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > >> Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace= with its own >> fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achieve fast= er improvement with >> features was due to the ability to use source code repository tools prop= erly. Unfortunate >> for Yahoo, their source code repository was not Apache svn trunk. > > I agree that the review process is broken. However, the current > situation is exactly the result of a lack of adherence to this and > other processes. Various subgroups within the community have > (intentionally or unintentionally) hijacked the project at different > times by avoiding community processes in the interest of agility or > commercial benefit, and the result is a highly fragmented project with > no clear direction. > > From the outside, Hadoop looks like a Yahoo/Cloudera project which > occasionally gets an Apache stamp. Given the lack of adherence to > processes, as a non-Yahoo/Cloudera developer I have no way of breaking > into the development community. Who's going to review or commit > patches I submit? And which of the myriad versions should I even be > trying to patch against? And given the speed with which undocumented > changes are being made, how am I supposed to figure out if my changes > are going to be relevant or viable next week? We'd love to contribute > back, but it's just not clear that we or other small players have any > place within the Hadoop developer community. As someone who has commit rights but undercommits, here are my issues -I am not full time on hadoop, I have little time to keep my own code up to date, let alone review patches -I am not fully up to date with all the changes or subtleties in what is a big, complicated system -I don't want to break the big systems (Y!, Facebook) by introducing changes that work on my network and my (small, dynamic) clusters but which place limitations on scale. It's why I prefer review by those people who do work on large scale projects. > >> Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, an= d developers >> should have the ability to make small incremental changes without RTC. = This will ensure developers >> help each other rather than policing each other. > > As an outsider, JIRA is the only way I've been able to follow the > changes to Hadoop's code and guess where the project is heading. > Permitting developers to commit without review or documentation will > just further exclude anyone who can't walk down the hall and knock on > an office door to ask about a commit. I've worked in other ASF projects (Axis) where some large dev teams (IBM) used to make decisions in team meetings and propagate them. It's faster, but less community centric, and when a large dev team (IBM) get re-assigned internally everyone is left not just scrambling to catch up engineering-wise, but also to make sense of big chunks of under-documented code. At least the JIRA-based review process not only provides a discussion log, Hudson/Jenkins checks that there are tests, no extra warnings, etc. What could be interesting would be -a move to Git to make it easier to pull in patches from other branches, and for people like Tony to have their own fork under SCM. -adoption of Gerrit for having each JIRA issue move from being a patch to a branch (local or remote), so that people can develop the code for an issue, others can pull it in and merge it, and so that the issue tracks live code, not dead patches -more testing of trunk in bigger real/virtual clusters I don't know how we can do this, I'd love to hear about experiences others have with such a process. --_000_C9E82D2A118ADeyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3394-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:37:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 630302E4E for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26189 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26133 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26125 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:37:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.229] (HELO nm7-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:37:03 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.191] by nm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 17:36:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.149] by tm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 17:36:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1032.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 17:36:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 889033.71772.bm@omp1032.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99217 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2011 17:36:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304617001; bh=NVyU6FOLid9dV9f9q2WjrxE+VTOwfP/24sAWV/h2N7Q=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mSfmtkJanS2Vg+JhJub5xbh++n1DMlXFtyDVD3z5zS6SIeQ9ZX3f+sV1XvrPO6LidhZQwRteHCc3Su8yOMyUaVh6IbCFm9pZ0ZZ/9EUb+lvtoa7K61k3+7j0bVeDYpoi3uskMkhfCNcma6JmCK2qc/su+gbDdHcFbK8T+hbCT60= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UmN2QD2lQJTc5tk50Ljt/El+Mh4OX+X5N1v8709QZSeZQLXupKwZsm4fPlhWnk19gPh4u0wXM+kw7PGrsqyvd7W3jijGsTRNesAB2q0EUrzIlJ+prhGbxBJuHYLBOYfoDGbg5QYRrYk4WKgTU1L4V6KQkc65yJ9h1Xfk3kYFQHI=; Message-ID: <672310.96845.qm@web65907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: M2i.AJAVM1kX5pBm4algY..bvUj5HVys5xkgF8199Smwr.M QfjAn6QnmvdNSNYvWT_2hry.ZfIvz43FWeG6P3Wb_VB365z4QIeDrEOCth8s W0OrRnPRAuFDtSqEoQ0trSuHmCxW2ekVl5S.jrEnT2dGcR8g9jHRyV50Wu.X D76oCMLhNRy0EeLMKU1lpH_gn09aO5e4VQ8hWltjsL_YwSadRlw5GKKCDoLG ujvHP62uc9obuK6ryxBEhSLledNfo8V6kMchCYxtEC8SrbBNpgBpc_.LeXc0 qsJEOTuE_V_r3n6aufN_.5B.fpSA3WWxe_rM.sU5Oq1V96SZ9orxPY54xUTB zZX0455LiEoO9w8dJsGoaLkftQtYPlS5OpGEvcKv9QhWEUS839DSpwr1L7bx gJiOprMYuyXatvaLbOaUTZxEvKufXzcyi_w-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:36:41 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 References: Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:36:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1926559672-1304617001=:96845" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1926559672-1304617001=:96845 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs? -1 Please don't check in anything before having a vote. Thanks. Nicholas ________________________________ From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 9:36:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Tom White wrote: >> One year ago (to the day!) Chris started a discussion about the >> release manager role >>(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ch2q1267dd3b1005041331r7d8f696di370a279ff605832f@mail.gmail.com%3E). >>. >> In light of today's disagreements, I think we should restart this >> discussion and incorporate these rules into the bylaws, since it >> formalizes our practices. >> >> I'm happy to drive this. We could start by discussing Chris' proposal >> (see clarifications in >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201005.mbox/%3Ct2y1267dd3b1005051201h7116e4caud75673ac9d5128d6@mail.gmail.com%3E), >>, >> then when we get consensus we can put the document on the website. >> (BTW does anyone know if the bylaws were checked into SVN anywhere? >> These belong together.) > > Sounds good to me. I like Chris' proposal, he was clear that "nothing > should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk." so that may > needs to be revisited if we want to be consistent with today's vote. > > I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How > about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part > of the docs? Eg this is how Pig does it: > http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html +1 makes sense. > > Thanks, > Eli > --0-1926559672-1304617001=:96845-- From general-return-3395-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:53:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52CBB2722 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49101 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49053 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49045 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:53:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:53:05 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3469602bwz.35 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.143 with SMTP id b15mr214854bkl.118.1304617964234; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:52:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 10:52:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef905367ec04a28b0ac2 --0016e6d7ef905367ec04a28b0ac2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. > However, it will only work if the entire community is willing to move to > git. Maintaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that we are > paying in full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the source > control. What do people think about fully adopting git instead of svn? > +1 for Git as a tool. But using git makes it even _more_ important that we have a clearly defined release process that outlines which branches are meant to be released as official artifacts, and what the inclusion criteria for those branches should be. -Todd > On 5/5/11 4:35 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > > On 05/05/11 10:51, Tony Valderrama wrote: > > Hi, I just wanted to drop in a few thoughts from a new developer > > working outside of the Hadoop developer community. > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> While the world demand agility, the "review then commit" process is > preventing progress > >> from happening. People end up having to generate multiple version of > patches to ensure > >> the code can be applied. The large lag time between patch generation > and reviewed > >> is taking significant toll on the community and progress. > > > >> Yahoo have a great team of developers who improves Hadoop at faster pace > with its own > >> fork of the source code. The reason that Yahoo was able to achieve > faster improvement with > >> features was due to the ability to use source code repository tools > properly. Unfortunate > >> for Yahoo, their source code repository was not Apache svn trunk. > > > > I agree that the review process is broken. However, the current > > situation is exactly the result of a lack of adherence to this and > > other processes. Various subgroups within the community have > > (intentionally or unintentionally) hijacked the project at different > > times by avoiding community processes in the interest of agility or > > commercial benefit, and the result is a highly fragmented project with > > no clear direction. > > > > From the outside, Hadoop looks like a Yahoo/Cloudera project which > > occasionally gets an Apache stamp. Given the lack of adherence to > > processes, as a non-Yahoo/Cloudera developer I have no way of breaking > > into the development community. Who's going to review or commit > > patches I submit? And which of the myriad versions should I even be > > trying to patch against? And given the speed with which undocumented > > changes are being made, how am I supposed to figure out if my changes > > are going to be relevant or viable next week? We'd love to contribute > > back, but it's just not clear that we or other small players have any > > place within the Hadoop developer community. > > As someone who has commit rights but undercommits, here are my issues > -I am not full time on hadoop, I have little time to keep my own code > up to date, let alone review patches > -I am not fully up to date with all the changes or subtleties in what > is a big, complicated system > -I don't want to break the big systems (Y!, Facebook) by introducing > changes that work on my network and my (small, dynamic) clusters but > which place limitations on scale. It's why I prefer review by those > people who do work on large scale projects. > > > > >> Use JIRA, if there is large feature set that requires brain storming, > and developers > >> should have the ability to make small incremental changes without RTC. > This will ensure developers > >> help each other rather than policing each other. > > > > As an outsider, JIRA is the only way I've been able to follow the > > changes to Hadoop's code and guess where the project is heading. > > Permitting developers to commit without review or documentation will > > just further exclude anyone who can't walk down the hall and knock on > > an office door to ask about a commit. > > I've worked in other ASF projects (Axis) where some large dev teams > (IBM) used to make decisions in team meetings and propagate them. It's > faster, but less community centric, and when a large dev team (IBM) get > re-assigned internally everyone is left not just scrambling to catch up > engineering-wise, but also to make sense of big chunks of > under-documented code. At least the JIRA-based review process not only > provides a discussion log, Hudson/Jenkins checks that there are tests, > no extra warnings, etc. > > What could be interesting would be > -a move to Git to make it easier to pull in patches from other > branches, and for people like Tony to have their own fork under SCM. > -adoption of Gerrit for having each JIRA issue move from being a patch > to a branch (local or remote), so that people can develop the code for > an issue, others can pull it in and merge it, and so that the issue > tracks live code, not dead patches > -more testing of trunk in bigger real/virtual clusters > > I don't know how we can do this, I'd love to hear about experiences > others have with such a process. > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d7ef905367ec04a28b0ac2-- From general-return-3396-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:10:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64561283C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91362 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91304 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91284 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:10:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:10:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:10:35 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1071694eya.35 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:10:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.50.196 with SMTP id z44mr1345815eeb.227.1304619013874; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:10:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <672310.96845.qm@web65907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <672310.96845.qm@web65907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:10:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How >> about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part >> of the docs? > > -1 > > Please don't check in anything before having a vote. =A0Thanks. > The project already has bylaws. Owen proposed them and they passed, we should check them into svn. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201011.mbox/%3CAANL= kTikWUHBedykosKNqPweuOvu2qCKfcf_+HwwivsQa@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks, Eli From general-return-3397-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:33:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F92B27C4 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62057 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:33:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62005 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61997 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:33:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:33:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:33:44 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2424170qwj.35 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:33:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5vb+DEvXxrYqean8J1lZnvTYocFdIXYmsg7tJzz+bzI=; b=aMsQ8newTGEYq78w3L8idJmBAWOt0IPmp9p8AjJ2wZvpw09PH39f1lr/nrf7f54dzK FNrHgDotVstycPAL1ieLBdpwsOIdKNxKirp+GjnUKjRwrByBQWx4hbWT3DelAFd8212u SVALPq1xyQ7dlFKYoksHXv56t1I61/pSUJC0I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Bq2UckUgAh7Qy4I0bLpmiRyk4KjvEk/LbEtCkFU7FhcgGd5oSFmV9OKXyUZ4Dbr/Bx JGUuIoaMC4wU/DSaaJz2miKDb1T9bc5GSCHg2WJejNmu6e0BPndP0hS3B8bTWd5fFRHb Yq36agrK12Co/xgHUebn7bIqjqM7wz4bQ9GjU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.125.66 with SMTP id x2mr2635572qar.365.1304620403926; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.29.6 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:33:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:33:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hkUyOF6KuZrt3ld1X_N_SaISasA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I abstain: +/- 0. I can't vote against the good work done by the crew at Y! But I can't vote for a 0.20.clusterbomb release that railroads over precedent compounding further the existing confusion that already exists around the state of Hadoop. Thanks, St.Ack On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Here's an updated release candidate for 0.20.203.0. I've incorporated the feedback and included all of the patches from 0.20.2, which is the last stable release. I also fixed the eclipse-plugin problem. > > The candidate is at: http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.203.0-rc1/ > > Please download it, inspect it, compile it, and test it. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-3398-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 19:04:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 267B22570 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46781 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:04:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46729 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46721 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 19:04:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:04:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:04:10 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p45J2wrJ040047 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304622178; bh=3TPUfkJhtcfhB+lLbOfzURHcBXBjZ1fpwZPj79b37O4=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Fs0l8uOIBc+FX3lHbuqJw89MKxAkaMvl08LkpjG7pFAgGdO00wP8WvAsDknaS3H2n 0zpo0KXF4aIr7YzDT4TBnatqzpwnBAT6LJM+B+2N5C2kHKc78Yw5gbvs5CiAWK+QbV xR5F02J3BjyoUkBXn5/6U59Rd5878pKugIzf2gps= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Thu, 5 May 2011 12:02:57 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:02:56 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKremA54H4Jsq0RZSx6FH9bjiPHgAqSFpV Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Downloaded the release, validated checksums, deployed a single-node cluster, and ran some HDFS sanity tests, Web UI tests and mapreduce examples. Regards, Suresh From general-return-3399-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 19:45:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9F6021FE for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37231 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:45:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37155 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37147 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 19:45:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:45:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.237] (HELO nm15-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:45:40 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.188] by nm15.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 19:45:18 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.132] by tm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 19:45:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 May 2011 19:45:18 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 97162.22607.bm@omp1015.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 46039 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2011 19:45:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304624717; bh=DP+Yqtu6pqfphhpLS4Lp3SV3O2p05bkbNV1VIPIaPDQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eTZLkjv2rNMX01G69U+MaSF8tM7X4Hk9mWRy1+3xr8UjClVb+U5N032UVmDm17g2NTr+XBor+VAmoSj1ARjVYX4RCFZ/87hkzFU5bwlg1bTJOoKawg9jHAfLuKRc0TL87e8Teq862nHJBzhDbYpEmuRMYGBzYLpBCB3SawK8N2E= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UqD7XZX414KBejZnaePiraFIZL0DGnWQ3Wu3TllteYo+ZUyFPmQleY8zVGdK1rClrRjAt57dqPCYD338hDwtGLvcWeU+wgHbNQQ/uRLG4DvTTi+R89UwSyGen8JzHyn+17lRgIjrlQoVTDw4Y+Dj3D5sQnHvJLEDrT5xBJaulFE=; Message-ID: <973709.45697.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: aBJPokYVM1lcdPvpX3g1PiTcsGSwgyOdlo92WTzL_skW.3J qp69euCTQcERdPU_RnD_TMNUS9SRKKgZGVEWZzZTlZj992o6noWJWsL_04DA Cnp.eU6Ve8n_I6msTCy3.oSb2X8xRMzYVfc98X49AET_SSNWK6i7l2Nz0syB sCXOAy2KO5DEldI9JyZAylCvKHhCR7efPFvPhBQ.TnX6880BGg7X_OflNjJ9 6fpRvFI1tz7qYbbhzSClP7cCAu39xmhsN7ev23GNMziwI.mO85LUp5zjDXJl 6SXdMoQCcoORaX65QfvlwyirClNNdsbqlXTJl_PLTym5wtWF9ZYpBMfM0Sct dbTGj_fHsubuA5_ryanbA48iAbBDYIha9YEyJ.Ozc3cadbLZ9D9pwufoSm3r LiBwR382m_hBY2g-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 12:45:17 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 References: <672310.96845.qm@web65907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:45:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1490471232-1304624717=:45697" --0-1490471232-1304624717=:45697 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Withdraw my -1. Eli, thanks for pointing it out about the vote. Nicholas ________________________________ From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 11:10:13 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release rules On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> I don't think the bylaws were checked in, we should do that first. How >> about checking them into the site repo so they get generated as part >> of the docs? > > -1 > > Please don't check in anything before having a vote. Thanks. > The project already has bylaws. Owen proposed them and they passed, we should check them into svn. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTikWUHBedykosKNqPweuOvu2qCKfcf_+HwwivsQa@mail.gmail.com%3E Thanks, Eli --0-1490471232-1304624717=:45697-- From general-return-3400-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 20:57:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F7A277E for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 20:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30580 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 20:57:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30530 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 20:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30522 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 20:57:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 20:57:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 20:57:39 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so2997110wyb.35 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=KrPtbqM9KAKXnwviBZ8T4ml53GogCQJkhuuA3IRx72U=; b=MYgFuWyTGwE0fyH04BI8BJ+mZq63mWglXm97LiNjL5Xz9QSrCS10xPKyLPhQj7fqp6 OgiFuqYufNTTM+Yd+6QgAzqYustXjX5tzNUAspSoiwH9YK4JaJZKun1OfrPeJWwIHU6m gJ9agAU3H0J6CdXQM6O/pV01mFH6Fh4QLFM2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=U+7RrR+cx/kDt2DYyZv0oJqvQtXO6RBi7G1Kg9nT3L+dtYrIot8y7T4EENr/kLeMZk IxUWs2EjBkBS0XkFC7ptq9cpI1JSqvokWVhMA/L1cYO8BOg65+KneKySoDdJR6PcG7bT 6+uHDFCiWNfqq/WZE9A7AoqORntz6+YYeOyH0= Received: by 10.216.203.195 with SMTP id f45mr6597620weo.89.1304629039162; Thu, 05 May 2011 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.80 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2011 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jakob Homan Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:56:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Downloaded, verified, tested on single node cluster to my satisfaction. We've also brought this release up on a sizable cluster and checked its basic sanity. Regardless of the difficult path we've had over the past year, this is a good chunk of code to get out to the community. I'd much rather explain a convoluted numbering system or what is or isn't in this release than continue to apologize for having no release at all. -Jakob On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > > +1 > > Downloaded the release, validated checksums, deployed a single-node > cluster, and ran some HDFS sanity tests, Web UI tests and mapreduce > examples. > > Regards, > Suresh > > > > From general-return-3401-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:11:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 864205B0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49948 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:11:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49898 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49889 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:11:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:11:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:10:59 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EA0438080 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:10:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=ZDQZN+CgyE66KuyH7pMLDEfScTRNt/EAWvLL9oWUyyh13PjMe5DS qFdbjmZkE0KkEopCTE9oW1GqMPLAIiYs0xPS0ChB2RTilgL66VoM3jbV15xfdI9K hmGL/lDPmjKXsSulJAQFDWAceRustHt1r8CgMFY3AOth9OFuXEz7uO0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=kQ5rDZn05URrqFsRNEVJoLTO4pE=; b=wcgiulDLllF0k3SPZ0pkopfAqefG dEK4PCjzrj276CLs5wI+LiFxUWP+Sq+09rk5z9EZLR9KzlqaULnp2oXiOr/Z6dBO fYfs7SJ5S3xU80EX1ajqXr5Lt5dWTsGnq3Ho6AZFbosKs9snllBSJQnqN9OjvNAO UPnwkpfc6W/ZcQ4= Received: from [10.134.89.86] (unknown [75.103.10.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a64.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C919E43807C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 14:10:38 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On May 4, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Roy, > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> The ASF is a vehicle for whomever wishes to collaborate on a >> given project. Collaboration means helping do the work. Those >> who do the work may do so for whatever reasons that they think >> are good, whether it is because they feel like being charitable >> today, they get paid a salary and the big boss said "work on >> this part", or because they just have an itch worth scratching. >> >> Apache does not care why people choose to collaborate or >> how they choose to apply their own intellectual efforts. We >> welcome all forms of contribution under the terms of our license. > > I don't think I was arguing against the contribution of the code in > that branch, it's very welcome, but I'm questioning (and ranting > about) the motivation for releasing a version that even just by name > is a weird hulla-hoop around the usual development practices that > Hadoop has had in the past (not that it's set in stone). Yes, and I said that kind of questioning is not appropriate. You are not responsible for other peoples' motivation. > So I wanted to contribute my negative non-binding vote to highlight > that this release is probably very confusing for the general user. > This is 0.20, but it's not. Also it has more numbers, and it starts at > 203. Why doing this at all instead of just moving on with 0.22? Or is > 0.22 bound to be like 0.21? It almost begs the question if this should > be called 0.22.0 then. Yes, I already made that same point. You don't need to talk about motivation in order to do so. If I had a vote, I would have voted -1 just because version numbers do matter to users, the three number form is well-known, and minting new versions is far cheaper than adding extra numbers. I'd have cut the release candidate as 0.30. However, I did not do that work. The person who did the work chose 0.20.203.0. Anyone who doesn't like that should vote accordingly and, preferably, make your communication about such things more open in the future so that you don't waste others' time on extra builds. And if the majority thinks releasing these bits are more important than my concerns, then I have to accept that as the will of the project. Please note also that policies are not technical discussions. Likewise, version numbers are not technical. If those were technical changes then anyone on the PMC could veto them, which would effectively mean anyone could veto a release and the project would quickly devolve into tyranny by minority. Likewise, just because I said that a successful release defines its own set of precedents (and therein policy), that doesn't mean the project can't vote on a new policy the next day or make another release that sets it again moving forward. Progress is in the doing. ....Roy From general-return-3402-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:42:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A28F2B78 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95670 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95602 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95594 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:42:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.238] (HELO nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:42:36 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.190] by nm16.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 00:42:15 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.144] by tm3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 00:42:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 00:42:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 211734.78341.bm@omp1027.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91314 invoked by uid 60001); 6 May 2011 00:42:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304642535; bh=X9DbxpfeR2fPYeKDE8fJLjUrRIwjBXfwGxKGCtZ20mk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cHIPgILjmkt+sTZQuprdu0GSFEWVUbhYlwHZmDfZDUYuNcHs+qXhGowHjB2uFO/yt4MUxN3ffY+rf8Z7QDfJaOE/ab3jQ5bjQwxDvnUMixs8zoDjd3ZdNH2fLSAQoxmuxvmWdBotXxr6sCF0AzoDRz6ZjV2zjvR7XXhCpdVAxj4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jrXEUioIubRFHhs1vLGCYpEDsw0KYtsBHKf19XVrgayrl5S9t7MxUsVAvU2hqh0kD3c1V1mEfByJu0nniii1xvcqWLNah5Uyg8WI2/qMG+EICbzT1NQviXv5eCKEZaHNkiDDqtl9gAPSw9EoT/2bgW9EdPoeu8gyr2B2fsXR+ks=; Message-ID: <95165.87987.qm@web65908.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Yq1k6pkVM1ko1iltuLSogj7Ns5MnvKs28XK4vNRKG8mi6M6 12iZYA6qfk4p6MJgj4I2zbDKoseRUgpa0XdqeJBhGxO4W6TmnurYn5UPz7KS uyFvgauzWRhm4W_5WAHeg7eb7ECM7YwZZc28rIvT.FjvH4RuFeSIblqHljUU k3Ya_gkvLHN7Q.KAvUIxl9r_G1OJ.KZGOrQL1GAKa8pwsGM1Fbx_R9nm8UR7 A4dlfV.H1JoMolbWwRnQjh88uWENS4wPNc_I60_m0V6MSSyobGlBQRQrlaLJ TRA54QaIa5hRqY6GRpKQ4K9DxKY_J9220dKTnVL24sGJF0lD8A3ifOooGN74 ASsqhJd464fKxClpbTfviWNJMqo6cNOL3e6R.UU8AuoTvXL172hjkYBWcYS5 lleabX6N11as7VQ-- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65908.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:42:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2097846283-1304642534=:87987" --0-2097846283-1304642534=:87987 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +1 on 0.20.203.0-rc1. I downloaded the release, verified signature, verified some message digests, started a one-node cluster and tested it with my MapReduce Math Library. In particular, I have run *DistMpMultTest* It runs 5 jobs: - 2 forward FFT jobs for calculating two 4086-dimensional DFTs. - 1 backward FFT job for calculating componentwise multiplication using a c program with GMP lib, and a 4086-dimensional inverse DFTs. - 1 componentwise summation job. - 1 job for carrying. *DistBbp* It runs 14 jobs for computing the 1024 bits of pi right after the billionth bit positions. Please see the details below. Regards, Nicholas ****** DistMpMultTest ****************************************************** distfft.VERSION = 20110124 distmpmult.VERSION = 20110307 distmpmult.LOCAL_THRESHOLD = 2^16 (=65536) args = [#=2 0: 18 1: gen ] dir = DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889 NEW: Zahlen(bitsPerDigit=32, digitsPerArray=4096, numArrays=128) SchonhageStrassen.Factory.valueOf(numDigits=262144): digitsPerOperand = 2^18 (=262144) (highest=262144) bitsPerElement = 2^12 (=4096) D = 2^12 (=4096) modulusExponent = 10240 (ss_e=8224) efficiency = 0.801171875 (N=2^24 (=16777216), n=10240) NEW: SchonhageStrassen[modulas=2^10240 + 1, D=2^12 (=4096), bitsPerElement=2^12 (=4096), Z=Zahlen(bitsPerDigit=2^5, digitLimit=2^32, digitsPerArray=2^12, numArrays=128)] NEW: Zahlen(bitsPerDigit=32, digitsPerArray=4096, numArrays=1) NEW: SchonhageStrassen[modulas=2^10240 + 1, D=2^12 (=4096), bitsPerElement=2^12 (=4096), Z=Zahlen(bitsPerDigit=2^5, digitLimit=2^32, digitsPerArray=2^12, numArrays=1)] numDigits = 2^18 (=262144) (e=18) digitsPerOperand = 262144 J = 2^6 (=64) K = 2^6 (=64) Verifier: STARTED WorkGroup: Created DistMpMultTest with 2 threads. multiply_mapreduce: c; x = [a, b] distfft: forward inverse = false distmpbase: Z = Zahlen bitsPerDigit = 2^5 (=32) digitLimit = 2^32 (=4294967296) digitsPerArray = 2^12 (=4096) numArrays = 1 digitsSupported = 4096 schonhagestrassen = SchonhageStrassen D = 2^12 (=4096) D^(-1) = -2^10228 modulus = 2^10240 + 1 bitsPerElement = 2^12 (=4096) zeta = [2^0, 2^5, 2^10, 2^15, 2^20, 2^25, 2^30, 2^35, 2^40, 2^45, ...] J = 2^6 (=64) K = 2^6 (=64) dir = DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889 digitsPerOperand = 262144 descriptor = FunctionDescriptor(input=a, output=a') descriptor = FunctionDescriptor(input=b, output=b') forward a: DistFft(J=2^6 (=64), K=2^6 (=64), dir=DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889, inverse=false) GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=0): cmd=[./gmp_mult, 16] GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): messager started. GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): START: Thu May 5 22:26:28 2011 GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): VERSION=20110122b, GMP4.1.4 GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): GmpMultiplier(Thread-260, count=1): argc=2, argv=[./gmp_mult, 16] SUBMIT JOB: DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889: a' = dft(a) forward b: DistFft(J=2^6 (=64), K=2^6 (=64), dir=DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889, inverse=false) SUBMIT JOB: DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889: b' = dft(b) Verifier: expected = + 0129ED2D B8CF7E1D A9BF33D8 9A294511 8508413C ... 4EA85F30 EF79A552 1C080D0C 82F6882C 8CE9F355 (524,288 digits, 16,777,209 bits) descriptor = FunctionDescriptor(input=a' ** b', output=c') backward: DistFft(J=2^6 (=64), K=2^6 (=64), dir=DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889, inverse=true) SUBMIT JOB: DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889: c' = dft^-1(a' ** b') 2272875ms (=37:52.875) : backward, DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889: c' = dft^-1(a' ** b') ----------------------------------------------------- descriptor = FunctionDescriptor(input=c'_0 + c'_1 + c'_2, output=c'') summation: DistMpSum(J=2^6 (=64), K=2^6 (=64), dir=DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c') SUBMIT JOB: DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c': c'' = c'_0 + c'_1 + c'_2 2805177ms (=46:45.177) : summation, DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c': c'' = c'_0 + c'_1 + c'_2 ----------------------------------------------------- descriptor = FunctionDescriptor(input=c'', output=c) carrying: DistCarrying(J=2^6 (=64), K=2^6 (=64), dir=DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c') SUBMIT JOB: DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c': c = carry(c'') 3456765ms (=57:36.765) : carrying, DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889/c': c = carry(c'') ----------------------------------------------------- multiply_mapreduce: returns ZahlenDescriptor(numParts=2^6 (=64), elementsPerPart=64) c = ZahlenDescriptor(numParts=2^6 (=64), elementsPerPart=64) 3456769ms (=57:36.769) : DistMpMult maxMemory = 963.00 MB totalMemory = 64.88 MB freeMemory = 26.32 MB computed = + 0129ED2D B8CF7E1D A9BF33D8 9A294511 8508413C ... 4EA85F30 EF79A552 1C080D0C 82F6882C 8CE9F355 (524,288 digits, 16,777,209 bits) 3457374ms (=57:37.374) : DONE (dir = DistMpMultTest-20110505-222621889) ****** DistBbp ************************************************************* Create file b1000000000-p1024-20110506-000707662.log STARTUP Fri May 06 00:07:07 UTC 2011 Started at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:156) Printed at org.apache.hadoop.mp.pi.DistSum.(DistSum.java:428) WorkGroup: Created DistSum.OutputProcessor with 1 threads. DistBbp.VERSION = 20100731 b = 1,000,000,000 (bits skipped) precision = 1,024 nWorkers = 14 nJobs = 1 machine = MapSide(p1,t1), m1t1 remoteDir = 100b-1024-test tmpDir = ../100b-1024-test DistBbp.processExistingJobOutputs = true Check existing job outputs from hdfs://NAMENODE/user/100b-1024-test ... Read existing results from hdfs://NAMENODE/user/tsz/100b-1024-test ... DistBbp.bellard = null ADD : P8_1: -[n:value=1,delta=8,limit=400000393; e:value=999999999,delta=-20,limit=-996], parts.length=1 ADD : P8_3: -[n:value=3,delta=8,limit=400000395; e:value=999999994,delta=-20,limit=-996], parts.length=1 ADD : P8_5: +[n:value=5,delta=8,limit=400000397; e:value=999999989,delta=-20,limit=-996], parts.length=1 ADD : P8_7: +[n:value=7,delta=8,limit=400000399; e:value=999999984,delta=-20,limit=-996], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_21: +[n:value=21,delta=20,limit=1000000981; e:value=999999982,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_3: -[n:value=3,delta=20,limit=1000000983; e:value=1000000000,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_5: -[n:value=5,delta=20,limit=1000000985; e:value=999999996,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_7: -[n:value=7,delta=20,limit=1000000987; e:value=999999996,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_9: +[n:value=9,delta=20,limit=1000000989; e:value=999999994,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_11: -[n:value=11,delta=20,limit=1000000991; e:value=999999992,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_13: +[n:value=13,delta=20,limit=1000000993; e:value=999999990,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_15: +[n:value=15,delta=20,limit=1000000995; e:value=999999986,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_17: +[n:value=17,delta=20,limit=1000000997; e:value=999999986,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 ADD : P20_19: -[n:value=19,delta=20,limit=1000000979; e:value=999999984,delta=-20,limit=-995], parts.length=1 1102ms (=1.102s) : EXECUTOR: 14 computation(s) 1298ms (=1.298s) : P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=1 P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 7667ms (=7.667s) : P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=2 P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 13327ms (=13.327s) : P8_7.job0003-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=3 P8_7.job0003-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 18670ms (=18.670s) : P20_3.job0005-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=4 P20_3.job0005-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 24281ms (=24.281s) : P8_5.job0002-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=5 P8_5.job0002-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 29693ms (=29.693s) : P8_1.job0000-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=6 P8_1.job0000-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 34917ms (=34.917s) : P20_19.job0013-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000048/1 = 50,000,048, ++nSubmittedJobs=7 P20_19.job0013-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 40135ms (=40.135s) : P20_21.job0004-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000048/1 = 50,000,048, ++nSubmittedJobs=8 P20_21.job0004-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 45458ms (=45.458s) : P20_13.job0010-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=9 P20_13.job0010-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 50666ms (=50.666s) : P20_11.job0009-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=10 P20_11.job0009-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 55942ms (=55.942s) : P20_7.job0007-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=11 P20_7.job0007-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 61261ms (=1:01.261) : P20_9.job0008-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=12 P20_9.job0008-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 66577ms (=1:06.577) : P20_17.job0012-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=13 P20_17.job0012-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 71752ms (=1:11.752) : P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683> starting, steps/cores = 50000049/1 = 50,000,049, ++nSubmittedJobs=14 P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683> sleep(5s) 187749ms (=3:07.749) : P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683> timetaken=3:06.451, --nSubmittedJobs=13 187753ms (=3:07.753) : ++DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=1 for P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683 > found 3 items in >hdfs://NAMENODE/user/100b-1024-test/P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683/out > write the result to 100b-1024-test/P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683.writable DistSum P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683> duration=142210(2:22.210), sigma=-[n:value=5,delta=20,limit=1000000985; e:value=999999996,delta=-20,limit=-995], value=[32:7AB75B81 4B81A170 48F78314 C1B677EF 6D8AA841 77D75680 AE63063C 378B6899 DBF6BB41 113B3C9E F6ADC215 2AA38330 14796B10 16862533 C17A6A17 4893ED2C 23570119 471AADFC 493994FA CBA6DBF4 C60A3E46 48E27ADC 6B2A442E 797C4011 40FCA6AF FE97AFAF 3FF6CB94 532F818F E2EA5E7F 7BC2FADF 83B2F466 07F9A5C7 ] 187804ms (=3:07.804) : --DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=0 for P20_5.job0006-20110506-000707683 EXECUTOR: 1/14 done, estimated time: remaining=40.94 minutes, total=44.09 minutes, sleep=2.300s 193403ms (=3:13.403) : P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683> timetaken=3:05.735, --nSubmittedJobs=12 193403ms (=3:13.403) : ++DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=1 for P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683 > found 3 items in >hdfs://NAMENODE/user/100b-1024-test/P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683/out > write the result to 100b-1024-test/P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683.writable DistSum P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683> duration=141830(2:21.830), sigma=+[n:value=15,delta=20,limit=1000000995; e:value=999999986,delta=-20,limit=-995], value=[32:FDC65838 CB87FD4C 0C6883F1 F6E7A8F4 903A3888 6C377451 138823A3 9B8AFB5D F1F60326 F5300E57 DFDDF086 83309616 8FBB61F1 C3D2CC7A 5414D92E 3A27B56C 305F6A64 BD1BE14D CDDE3433 AD57BF9C C3CCCF98 BB7AF093 A42E5EB8 7182B1A0 09058BF0 5C2EF773 A8B4D621 ADD9C960 32272AAD 0B060FFA D0932CC6 ACAF0A05 ] 193419ms (=3:13.419) : --DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=0 for P20_15.job0011-20110506-000707683 EXECUTOR: 2/14 done, estimated time: remaining=19.36 minutes, total=22.58 minutes, sleep=2.200s 338790ms (=5:38.790) : P8_7.job0003-20110506-000707683> timetaken=5:25.463, --nSubmittedJobs=11 ... 1087176ms (=18:07.176) : --DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=0 for P20_17.job0012-20110506-000707683 EXECUTOR: 13/14 done, estimated time: remaining=1.39 minutes, total=19.52 minutes, sleep=1.100s 1097443ms (=18:17.443) : P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683> timetaken=17:05.691, --nSubmittedJobs=0 1097443ms (=18:17.443) : ++DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=1 for P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683 > found 3 items in >hdfs://NAMENODE/user/100b-1024-test/P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683/out > write the result to 100b-1024-test/P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683.writable DistSum P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683> duration=142280(2:22.280), sigma=-[n:value=3,delta=8,limit=400000395; e:value=999999994,delta=-20,limit=-996], value=[32:9850C816 183C9765 11830320 A12AB99B 81D93E98 061769A9 0FBBCAF7 3AEE5079 5673D8FA 0A352C71 C025AC12 5D482AC1 276E834F C862BF85 D9B79DE5 1264B724 A5C5FD90 2677498B DDF05B2B D298E033 9AB3DC52 2A3DB5AA 2835506D DF795BCB 743CC0FE 27AA4F1F 1F711BAB 52E4F4E6 5410CE20 CD27ACB6 6C7F6810 95F97608 ] 1097461ms (=18:17.461) : --DistSum.OutputProcessor.count=0 for P8_3.job0001-20110506-000707683 EXECUTOR: 14/14 done, estimated time: remaining=0.00 ms, total=18.31 minutes, sleep=1s Write to hdfs://NAMENODE/user/tsz/100b-1024-test/b1000000000-p1024 ... b = 1,000,000,000 (bits skipped) CPU time = 1991670ms = 33:11.670 END Fri May 06 00:25:26 UTC 2011 [32: 3E08FF2B 03F1829E 05C038A3 2884A9C4 E7DEF417 875B1C22 D2DDDA11 D99573D8 43F80107 AB3A56CC C975C849 2DC5AD43 1D191704 9064DE41 67DE5C6E 0F264D33 D903CE49 F2324781 D9D7ED45 FAA9272D CAA42278 E8EF2FFF 450E2183 25FA9AB3 459D01AF AEF8AF79 DD6CC766 12152C31 2F31ABCD DCF01DEC 67332105 643A438D ] ****** END ****************************************************** --0-2097846283-1304642534=:87987-- From general-return-3403-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 10:08:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B97381C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 10:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27403 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 10:08:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27317 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 10:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27309 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 10:08:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:08:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lars.francke@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 10:08:45 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so5216490vxa.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:08:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FUiiej8iqUeFP/KO4F9XhdvRg6zOlX5zZ/VorlW3OYg=; b=b4zxRwL3txeEuxfMcnEOJdsv9Fg21gDXwIfHOkjrQQvk56XvuovmD1Hrl4SlF51jmm zHbjppSxhxz+r8/uh2Cp7AmnyzGOQ876Lg4hh6WvjR7lcG0+vAEwUJCuXDk3r+xvZmX9 4Jrqh1QTZiJHMLwcFYxq+/SF/qjwzjIfPvoZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ajdCpjBjT7TwBOFQZEIa6B0/LLgxIYtGVEblXsneOIkXa2bUa2NHn7DTbmGyI3rnD0 /eIIk/267QsrSgqfDR8lxsnpx7d9PPAGcuZUcAb7zfNkhzmzXQnxhBdem7B0UjXmAIAD Eqmu0UK4bfnCxaVLrpbfC92nKotV+KXh1XBTo= Received: by 10.52.98.227 with SMTP id el3mr1090276vdb.244.1304676504107; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:08:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.115.133 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:07:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <321761.51699.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> From: Lars Francke Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 12:07:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > " =C2=A0 BZ-4182948. Add statistics logging to Fred for better visibility= into > startup time costs. (Matt Foley)" > - I believe I saw a note from Matt on the JIRA yesterday about this featu= re, > where he decided that the version done in 203 wasn't a good approach, and > it's done differently in trunk (not sure if done yet). Could anyone elaborate on what this "Fred" is that has been coming up on these threads a few times now? And is there something like a RELEASE NOTES draft that I could look over? I try to follow these mailing lists as best as I can but I have lost track of all the branches and features being worked on and I can't imagine I'm the only one. It would be nice to get an overview of what this release is all about where work is being done etc. Thanks! Cheers, Lars From general-return-3404-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:53:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32B6A31A3 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55994 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:53:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55940 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:53:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55932 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:53:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:53:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:53:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB741BA94F for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:52:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vbglCahS5bbT for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:52:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEB81BA401 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:52:42 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305287551.10042@rkrJvcpTtrxiNl7C3UPJUQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p46BqU1B013372 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:52:30 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC3E0FE.9060207@apache.org> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:52:30 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 References: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> <9234135B-FD91-4E92-B4F5-6E6F7EB38A94@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: <9234135B-FD91-4E92-B4F5-6E6F7EB38A94@Holsman.NET> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p46BqU1B013372 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Vote: +1 I'm a committer not PMC, so it's non binding. Why: -looks and works OK on my desktop -we've been using Y! releases, and this brings their branch back into the apache fold, meaning we can say "the official Apache release of Apache Hadoop is something you can use in production". -I'm confident that the Y! team have tested this well. I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of 100% compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this release has shipped. -Steve From general-return-3405-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 12:45:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5EA239D5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23752 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 12:45:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23702 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 12:45:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23694 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 12:45:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:45:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:45:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A910B7F7D for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:45:09 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dYpso4g29yNt for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:45:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFC7B7F68 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:45:08 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305290696.63219@pkpaUvQuS3CfHinNLcGT3g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p46Ciu64014722 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:44:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC3ED48.6000702@apache.org> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:44:56 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop References: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p46Ciu64014722 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/05/11 18:52, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. >> However, it will only work if the entire community is willing to move to >> git. Maintaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that we are >> paying in full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the source >> control. What do people think about fully adopting git instead of svn? >> > > +1 for Git as a tool. But using git makes it even _more_ important that we > have a clearly defined release process that outlines which branches are > meant to be released as official artifacts, and what the inclusion criteria > for those branches should be. > I'm +0.9995 for git: some bits I like, some bits I don't (it's awful for binary data). And you need more than just a release process locked down, you need the developers understanding following a good process. If you have written down process docs there, I'd love to see them. apache infrastructure are discussing git -what would be best would be to start with a non-critical project, such as one or more of the moved contrib projects (like MR-Unit), so we can see that it, gerrit, etc work well within the Hadoop developer world. From general-return-3406-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 13:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F4263BBF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29749 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 13:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29700 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 13:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29692 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 13:45:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:45:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 27167 invoked by uid 507); 6 May 2011 13:44:48 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.639064 secs); 06 May 2011 13:44:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 6 May 2011 13:44:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DA313243A1; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:47 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pRb0mtCiatk; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:47 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.29] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.29]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539231324371; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:47 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DC402B7.8070900@uci.cu> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 09:46:23 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Steve Loughran Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop References: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> <4DC3ED48.6000702@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC3ED48.6000702@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/06/2011 08:14 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 05/05/11 18:52, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Eric Yang wrote: >> >>> Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. >>> However, it will only work if the entire community is willing to >>> move to >>> git. Maintaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that >>> we are >>> paying in full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the >>> source >>> control. What do people think about fully adopting git instead of svn? >>> >> >> +1 for Git as a tool. But using git makes it even _more_ important >> that we >> have a clearly defined release process that outlines which branches are >> meant to be released as official artifacts, and what the inclusion >> criteria >> for those branches should be. >> > > I'm +0.9995 for git: some bits I like, some bits I don't (it's awful > for binary data). And you need more than just a release process locked > down, you need the developers understanding following a good process. > If you have written down process docs there, I'd love to see them. > > apache infrastructure are discussing git -what would be best would be > to start with a non-critical project, such as one or more of the moved > contrib projects (like MR-Unit), so we can see that it, gerrit, etc > work well within the Hadoop developer world. > > > +1 for Git We migrated from SVN to Git for our completed infrastructure, for many reason: - Git use much less space than SVN, all the changes are in a single .git - Git is awesome for branching - Another great advantage is that there are many developers that know Git, and how the development process can be greatly improved. PostgreSQL, one of my favorites open source projects that I use on my daily work, migrated the development process to Git from CVS. Regards. -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 http://about.me/marcosortiz From general-return-3407-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:48:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C83C3F52 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60094 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60030 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60022 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:48:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:48:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:48:46 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=pamtRap3GtJk1lWhPrldiCY3kGnGgm2zyCyywCoUbi2ye8MYRJdljY/Q 6pYIyDJ3aND/62ITN2n99lDIxV0JyoiR0U1ubDrT/dhHeV7yBbYA8bSgH i9vf472a9CDyzOe; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304700526; x=1336236526; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VF1bbQWV4VK30KhA1GifIljtApnL2HF/dk7C4ag3iPg=; b=pWYWtRQc5q0kSp8IPLVpRT5p0EuPZfbdgR0lLTZmyrYq3Sb1aNTmBqD+ yHmBo2Y7UkPRX3gn8wlqaXp9MSmouOOmynyS0Thyk3SU7HmXr0WqfjxBX aHQOfBOKWq9aN0j; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,327,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22924164" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:51:29 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Steve Loughran Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AQHMCwoF5EVOIXU1nkuwTbIZGN61ApR+kEyAgABjsgCAAAWnAIABPG0AgAAZjYD//7UFgA== Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:51:28 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DC402B7.8070900@uci.cu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <5B9BCCFB9CF6524695285BCB4425F578@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1 for git. When (not if) Apache Hadoop switches to git, I would recommend all to consider the branching model beautifully described in http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/6/11 7:16 AM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: >On 05/06/2011 08:14 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> On 05/05/11 18:52, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Eric Yang wrote: >>> >>>> Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. >>>> However, it will only work if the entire community is willing to >>>> move to >>>> git. Maintaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that >>>> we are >>>> paying in full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the >>>> source >>>> control. What do people think about fully adopting git instead of >>>>svn? >>>> >>> >>> +1 for Git as a tool. But using git makes it even _more_ important >>> that we >>> have a clearly defined release process that outlines which branches are >>> meant to be released as official artifacts, and what the inclusion >>> criteria >>> for those branches should be. >>> >> >> I'm +0.9995 for git: some bits I like, some bits I don't (it's awful >> for binary data). And you need more than just a release process locked >> down, you need the developers understanding following a good process. >> If you have written down process docs there, I'd love to see them. >> >> apache infrastructure are discussing git -what would be best would be >> to start with a non-critical project, such as one or more of the moved >> contrib projects (like MR-Unit), so we can see that it, gerrit, etc >> work well within the Hadoop developer world. >> >> >> >+1 for Git > >We migrated from SVN to Git for our completed infrastructure, for many >reason: >- Git use much less space than SVN, all the changes are in a single .git >- Git is awesome for branching >- Another great advantage is that there are many developers that know >Git, and how the development process can be greatly improved. > >PostgreSQL, one of my favorites open source projects that I use on my >daily work, migrated the development process to Git from CVS. > >Regards. > >--=20 >Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) > University of Information Sciences, > La Habana, Cuba > Linux User # 418229 > http://about.me/marcosortiz > From general-return-3408-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 18:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49307365B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 882 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 804 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 796 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 18:31:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:31:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.197] (HELO nm11-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:31:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.152] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 571912.32407.bm@omp1035.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 81724 invoked by uid 60001); 6 May 2011 18:30:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1304706656; bh=nLYtR+F48n9fTQTUSdQTevldMzCT+LnBFUga6wqaBJg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b81z5lLvpZDBTF066ANrEc/1AVFFzUH1Z5NXbajDpXAeoNiTym7gxzDDMd1zk2T6Th8GajMy3wiaEVXXLHP7aPxWWOVcl5FOCPWdwblMywd7bEz9hKfGQbejWHcM1dA2xEAJooqyMx/qSyB2QH0MUN0Mtd10x7b5maK3JeJtEd8= Message-ID: <403388.69170.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2QW48NwVM1mTOrH1rzIlZMnTggOlvIqwlzAHiEA5DyMw0OL vgV0eoB0Ztb.F6FvqOdYmTi5Cz5O0RgkKh1Y67k6VMc2tClOC6c8EWkKjDIQ 65gxWzIgtWiDV9iy0iFDaWPdiQi.T_DwHvDYLOkk0QxcJsxl1i9rf_FFDclB cOaVb.w3emyWpDGlMcwaSf.LzBJBIMiq3jBRuygQ5WcQAGTfxvjMdqG8DuRt qPhnxiy07biwC8npoII5fEvwIb6Y7ghXMiNVN4usk5rHTx800mKc3n4LOA3a eOa9taPZ_i5mkp8rH3TlA2oMt0ydlSRCDaGouAmHpjr7RNpY5bGvLlcrUoEC I5pmcIYWqGUmYJLnA8pmNDR3iWJFlKzBACq0ruIEEzoIPLUu1jmpdjFIxL7X rNmeqY2BJ2vF_80U21V1s7A3qlvc0t8LRxpWJVAofauq8O.yIDzGnchnvuyR MkL_94o0VZA-- Received: from [69.231.27.174] by web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:30:56 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4DC3E0FE.9060207@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -we've been using Y! releases, and this brings their branch > back into the apache fold, meaning we can say "the official > Apache release of Apache Hadoop is something you can use in > production". And it is worth consideration that there is some measure of competition between Apache Hadoop and other projects, for example: http://twitter.com/#!/CurtMonash/status/66343706743160832 "@SethGrimes The @DataStax story is "Cassandra is mature, unlike Apache Hadoop, and hence will rescue Hadoop"" I've requested proof points..." and they are happy to exploit any perception of division, lack of forward progress, and such. Perhaps this is additional, and I pray sufficient, motivation to cease the proxy battles, bury the hatchet, etc. - Andy --- On Fri, 5/6/11, Steve Loughran wrote: > From: Steve Loughran > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Friday, May 6, 2011, 4:52 AM > > Vote: +1 > > I'm a committer not PMC, so it's non binding. > > > Why: > -looks and works OK on my desktop > -we've been using Y! releases, and this brings their branch > back into the apache fold, meaning we can say "the official > Apache release of Apache Hadoop is something you can use in > production". > -I'm confident that the Y! team have tested this well. > > I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there > that hasn't gone into trunk yet is danger. However, as the > team makes no guarantees of 100% compatibility between > releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just something > that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this > release has shipped. > > > -Steve > > From general-return-3409-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:03:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7A6F3EC4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46075 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45925 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45917 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:03:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:03:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:03:26 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4682998bwz.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:03:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.19.82 with SMTP id z18mr1956808bka.175.1304708585537; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.37.204 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 12:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 12:03:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a726c6c04804a2a023c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555a726c6c04804a2a023c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great job of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two things: 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC members Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your name, now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and you'll have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and submission process. To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! Regards, Jeff p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll see about how we can teleconference you into the event. --00032555a726c6c04804a2a023c7-- From general-return-3410-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:05:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 110A53F9B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28119 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:05:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28066 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28058 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:05:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:05:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4756952bwz.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.8.141 with SMTP id h13mr1336767bkh.64.1304712307192; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:05:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.143 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:04:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EB044AB-A4F8-4530-AB68-0A675D96BCF8@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> <4EB044AB-A4F8-4530-AB68-0A675D96BCF8@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 13:04:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: Nigel Daley Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151743fa569ab4e704a2a1010f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151743fa569ab4e704a2a1010f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey folks, FYI I'm in the process of loading one of the SVN dumps onto a server here. MAN is it slow. Going maybe 2 revisions/sec.... so I should have an SVN replica in somewhere around a week to test with. @Infra: I don't suppose it's possible to get a writable snapshot mounted somehow? If I recall correctly, ZFS supports this and svn.apache.org runs ZFS? -Todd On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I can't do this at 2pm now. Todd, I suspect you want more time to try out > the svn/git test anyways. > > Let's shoot for next Wednesday at 2pm. Ian should be back by then too. > Any objections? > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > > On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Wasn't sure how to go about doing that. I guess we need to talk to infra > about it? Do you know how we might clone the SVN repos themselves to test > with? > > > > It looks like there are svn dumps at http://svn-master.apache.org/dump/from 2 april 2011. You should be able to use those to setup a local > subversion. > > > > -- Owen > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00151743fa569ab4e704a2a1010f-- From general-return-3411-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:22:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44602364F for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48019 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:22:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47858 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:22:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47660 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:22:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:22:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:21:57 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so5858606qyk.14 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6rIfvMKaChVZzTEs81GA4q3MnIej/5avRKwJpHZHeTM=; b=rzekpelkifoLHx6KcsJcN2LZrnzL6EXSRGWMuDqGiSdfh/KckLg2clgjwDNvoOFNvw vkGXoi/g8AKABe5IZ3bPwIibNi6Ekya9am18p5h5dXICoGchZeLypjA1Q7BxR9xQ+o47 XKZlv8MZLyisdcd+EQtB2IGrN72C1EmF7kOLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J7Kls/w8COYpiEJ2+oPkjBwyS3778veFhm4MSD4GeW+9ltB9LJRiULOSmkRqb9l4up rWVhzgnrxklXvmd1jc8jbKm/PHnMiNb3PS+BdV5cJns/zmUCgnsxEZaTDLltXei9/Erq 1IX7AdRndISVCp5ogvmvf14Va6vjkRfPmqkQQ= Received: by 10.52.172.242 with SMTP id bf18mr458894vdc.161.1304713296058; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.101.193 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 13:20:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> <4EB044AB-A4F8-4530-AB68-0A675D96BCF8@mac.com> From: Paul Davis Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Cc: Nigel Daley , general@hadoop.apache.org, Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You might want to look around at the options for imports more. I know when I was doing git-svn clones it was doing something stupid like 1 rev/s until I found a --log-window setting. Not sure if that's from the git layer or the svn layer but it made orders of magnitude difference. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey folks, > > FYI I'm in the process of loading one of the SVN dumps onto a server here= . > > MAN is it slow. Going maybe 2 revisions/sec.... so I should have an SVN > replica in somewhere around a week to test with. > > @Infra: I don't suppose it's possible to get a writable snapshot mounted > somehow? If I recall correctly, ZFS supports this and svn.apache.org runs > ZFS? > > > -Todd > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I can't do this at 2pm now. =A0Todd, I suspect you want more time to try= out >> the svn/git test anyways. >> >> Let's shoot for next Wednesday at 2pm. =A0Ian should be back by then too= . >> =A0Any objections? >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> > >> > On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> > >> >> Wasn't sure how to go about doing that. I guess we need to talk to in= fra >> about it? Do you know how we might clone the SVN repos themselves to tes= t >> with? >> > >> > It looks like there are svn dumps at http://svn-master.apache.org/dump= /from 2 april 2011. You should be able to use those to setup a local >> subversion. >> > >> > -- Owen >> > >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3412-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 00:46:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF4C93052 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79004 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:46:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78948 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78940 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 00:46:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:46:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:45:59 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Xk+oSpN+Fot1Lxsox3obaAUETASgSXa/7Z3ycBUC1E93I59g9qIx/0PQ QybrHsjfIhhT4k68GSx0uAoopke1pQFg6EObCTUagVXT2iJjEjsDyxDGL uc68OybACnIUzL0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304729159; x=1336265159; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=g0XhI5STImXmzsqBl4JpTf5Lb2eJZRb99odqSU1Cv9o=; b=GLB1kr0XdDSYM1dsjGH0Tk6XYMp8EQxsSWz61anJFCsmaIzlvhjjGMFz BhS1g19PC5g74UlGon0jVDJRHfZSAJ71vFVlSEv1JLxObkdRn2xZqd66U xyriPK2IZVecOoR; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,329,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23531428" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 17:49:05 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCoHKs40jdRozskC+8soYJjDqwpR9roiAgAAAxwCAAAUFAIAAAdSAgAAC2wCAAALqAIABUn0AgAAf0oCAAdIfAA== Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 00:49:04 +0000 Message-ID: <5B44D291-757D-4C0C-9AAB-2EAF55B4208D@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7DE3616669EFF64AA867EF27908C188D@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 5, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 >=20 > Downloaded, verified, tested on single node cluster to my > satisfaction. We've also brought this release up on a sizable cluster > and checked its basic sanity. All of you people doing single node tests are missing stuff. For example,= the regression in how the secondary namenode addr stuff works vs. 0.20. =20 By far, the biggest problem we've found is that the capacity scheduler doc= umentation doesn't actually match what the code does. I have a hunch that = the unit tests were written/change to match the outcome, rather than test w= hat is supposed to happen. For us, this breakage makes it unusable out of = the box and we'll likely either go back to our (relatively stable) backport= of 0.21's cap sched, try to fix the 0.20.203 code, or maybe even switch to= a completely different scheduler.= From general-return-3413-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 00:49:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E96E3E4F for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80703 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:49:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80651 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:49:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80643 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 00:49:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:49:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:49:37 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c28.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.28]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p470kgxb094469 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 17:46:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304729203; bh=ydnPzOXRQVpBnU2VNdw7TlSHtRm8kee0wshzjroMwpU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=josZoo9lI++sHmiREPVXRj2pZNHa1QSjaeR+PvDZpkgWTz5rFK1g8K6cZKE5ereta UfuIfgRvl0fW42Yl2elp25+uM+/nKWxuUW9dAJIL6QvG1MC3XezR714ova6pDqbSaT IvLHpifJ2dTJfs9kFi1/UoYeHHAFvwllYQZg7Kdo= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 17:46:42 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Hi Jeff, Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking = to? Thanks, E14 On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, >=20 > The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great = job > of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done = a > great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading > through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two = things: >=20 > 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk > 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >=20 > To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and = Facebook > would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the = 13 > (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port = the > work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >=20 > Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our = Palo Alto > and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following = Wednesday, > 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC > members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC = members Eli > Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >=20 > Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your = name, > now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. = Forward > porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and = you'll > have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and > submission process. >=20 > To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >=20 > As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera = SF > offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't = make > it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >=20 > Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >=20 > Regards, > Jeff >=20 > p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll = see > about how we can teleconference you into the event. From general-return-3414-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 00:52:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6F723E76 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84289 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:52:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84226 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84218 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 00:52:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:52:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:52:27 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Hryp9fIqdJTLzOVMZ9ZYX1cniLeV0/CHca3MSm6GO1uAS+ipSFaxyGL2 4C3UALtslvJvMqBawiPHc8g1Q+LiXTkKdETpfZLbGyB6gWJU5K409xR6c kldmEBS/z3Veerz; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304729547; x=1336265547; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aSuAKKA2q/dhaTIuuW4Ii2ly1BedNFlxTRVnfJGkGeM=; b=R7PrnO45uey80/LI3ZYbiHTvxvuZQyQoUrPq2u9LOkHBLNQtferSVGyK 6kl2e2foeL4N3aQUIUSFqjc45ASnQQtBr/8Oo/sdrrQCpMVKJ5XhTp2JM 6PvB86D17NyLzed; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,329,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23531513" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 17:55:33 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Topic: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Index: AQHMDCDH76fHc6JVUECnxku7xExO05SA/Y0A//+MKAA= Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 00:55:33 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4B3E205E6A8DDF44A77D97E9901B0CD3@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org (Channeling Allen Wittenauer...:-) *Grabbing Popcorn...* - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com On 5/6/11 5:46 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >Hi Jeff, > >Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking to? > >Thanks, > >E14 > >On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >> Hey, >>=20 >> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great >>job >> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a >> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two >>things: >>=20 >> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>=20 >> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and >>Facebook >> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 >> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port >>the >> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>=20 >> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo >>Alto >> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following >>Wednesday, >> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC >> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC >>members Eli >> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>=20 >> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your >>name, >> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. >>Forward >> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and >>you'll >> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >> submission process. >>=20 >> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>=20 >> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera >>SF >> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't >>make >> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>=20 >> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>=20 >> Regards, >> Jeff >>=20 >> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll >>see >> about how we can teleconference you into the event. > From general-return-3415-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 01:44:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFC073E2C for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 01:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8575 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 01:44:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8518 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 01:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8509 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 01:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 01:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 01:44:01 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p471hZZF096755 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:43:35 -0700 From: Todd Papaioannou To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 18:43:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwMWC1+DW2Ye9SjRjmnu3sJKhCKeA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5B44D291-757D-4C0C-9AAB-2EAF55B4208D@linkedin.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Allen, Can you provide some more details into what issues you are seeing with the capacity scheduler? Is it just the docs don't match the code, or are you seeing real issues with job scheduling? Thanks ToddP On 5/6/11 5:49 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: > >On May 5, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> +1 >>=20 >> Downloaded, verified, tested on single node cluster to my >> satisfaction. We've also brought this release up on a sizable cluster >> and checked its basic sanity. > > All of you people doing single node tests are missing stuff. For >example, the regression in how the secondary namenode addr stuff works >vs. 0.20. =20 > > By far, the biggest problem we've found is that the capacity scheduler >documentation doesn't actually match what the code does. I have a hunch >that the unit tests were written/change to match the outcome, rather than >test what is supposed to happen. For us, this breakage makes it unusable >out of the box and we'll likely either go back to our (relatively stable) >backport of 0.21's cap sched, try to fix the 0.20.203 code, or maybe even >switch to a completely different scheduler. From general-return-3416-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 02:29:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A68427BD for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 02:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23404 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 02:28:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23356 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 02:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23348 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 02:28:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 02:28:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 02:28:52 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=bgNaFuQw/75NImzhPuhug2Mo0t+bC5Idqbu58HcWy45wVoS6ti9Tx99d 7WxJUX1QA895tf1/Oy/E0woSK32LjZzWPxjbYYbImAYJUMEdhrCbFHFWq ziz3BbgOD3WkCoE; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304735332; x=1336271332; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=XlaI2sTGST6pZ+/fGtTxVY8KPxdTsVnbNgE5WqfwpAY=; b=arEJ6lUz5sm1E1KFgJPcMSNW/iEOaRmyW1oBB4VPUUqxvvEcttZUoc9L yCHZXdX509G5UCEr/QbNvqRVrIhfd+2f3s5bG3/IdZJVj2O4xYy6O+6Wi o1oRNR+rtQT5Ytu; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,329,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22945328" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:31:59 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCoHKs40jdRozskC+8soYJjDqwpR9roiAgAAAxwCAAAUFAIAAAdSAgAAC2wCAAALqAIABUn0AgAAf0oCAAdIfAIAAEFOAgAAMkIA= Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 02:31:58 +0000 Message-ID: <993A636D-D5F2-41C4-93DC-9B02E07F5B65@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <04CAC0D8A8CA824BAA7F5FC7B01D9DE1@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 6, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Todd Papaioannou wrote: > Allen, >=20 > Can you provide some more details into what issues you are seeing with th= e > capacity scheduler? Is it just the docs don't match the code, or are you > seeing real issues with job scheduling? Jobs are definitely not getting the maximum number of task slots they shou= ld be getting. I'm suspecting a bug with how max-limit of -1 queues are ha= ndled. I'll actually be in the office next week to try and see if I can fi= gure out where things are going haywire. [I filed a bug on this a few weeks ago before I left for vacation. It was= basically ignored.]= From general-return-3417-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 03:35:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 129992768 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 03:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58902 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 03:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58498 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 03:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58487 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 03:34:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:34:47 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so2451303pve.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.3.139 with SMTP id c11mr1608480pbc.277.1304739265080; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:34:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.38 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:34:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:34:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UsUaDcjV8h52uEiabTKSsLTiX4g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:46, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking to? Aren't you at Y! anymore, Eric? Wow! > Thanks, > > E14 > > On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great job >> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a >> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two things: >> >> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >> >> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook >> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 >> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port the >> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >> >> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo Alto >> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following Wednesday, >> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC >> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC members Eli >> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >> >> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your name, >> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward >> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and you'll >> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >> submission process. >> >> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >> >> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF >> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't make >> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >> >> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >> >> Regards, >> Jeff >> >> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll see >> about how we can teleconference you into the event. > > From general-return-3418-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 04:52:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D9A82638 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 04:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93024 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 04:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92203 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 04:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92187 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 04:52:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 04:52:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 04:52:01 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p474pQV9089047 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:51:26 -0700 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:51:22 -0700 Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Topic: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Index: AcwMcmwKZlRvRfUPRb+9LEfdaL1h+A== Message-ID: <9CFF0257-889B-44F4-9114-9C0534D1B7DE@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cos, These are difficult times for the community as a whole, the least we can do= it treat each other with respect and dignity in these public forums.=20 Your comment was in very poor taste, please refrain from such in the future= . Thank you, Arun Sent from my iPhone On May 6, 2011, at 8:35 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:46, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >>=20 >> Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking to= ? >=20 > Aren't you at Y! anymore, Eric? Wow! >=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> E14 >>=20 >> On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>=20 >>> Hey, >>>=20 >>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great = job >>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done = a >>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two thi= ngs: >>>=20 >>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>>=20 >>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebo= ok >>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 1= 3 >>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port = the >>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>>=20 >>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo= Alto >>> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following Wedne= sday, >>> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC >>> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC member= s Eli >>> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>>=20 >>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your na= me, >>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forwa= rd >>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and you= 'll >>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>> submission process. >>>=20 >>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>=20 >>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera = SF >>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't = make >>> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>>=20 >>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>>=20 >>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll = see >>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3419-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 05:55:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E20F2DC8 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 05:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18223 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 05:55:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17840 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 05:55:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17832 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 05:55:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 05:55:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.177] (HELO homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 05:55:30 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C7E59405E for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=llcOh8W/1u/0Ue4fq2Kj02CbDl7KeM36ZBD620qPjn0RoiYELOlb 93b9Mi3aO+ElgxoNk/TPZxFFgn72Jabu5VCGkrhC2+ZKUDqecIuvDnK8RmtVTwvK We9Ep9E/XXJd+pEG9TUd1opHwPFAFgbnm3ELE9R6uyMhZs4xtlzP5q4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=Cxli3m8z7VtY/1w47Ld9xt5czZc=; b=XpbJp4gUdoHlgEakvI3iOOP7CWWz +Wx4xFEXIobdh41geWJZ5BB105yY7CnLHxJZwZWFOv0cCgMaH5OEixkuLk8kojmA GFawnpwJfy0oMNSqYBhhAohCfTrKB9cDfLHjUpxEYE1bTwf9iSCd5Yna3HxKAWMF 6Yw/iiumHCWISH4= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5B5E594059 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:55:08 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please do not turn this into yet another git discussion. The issues Hadoop is having, with extensive development on private branches rather than collaboration on a common Apache trunk, is a direct result of how many of the core developers are using git. This project has quickly become the poster boy for antisocial behavior via dvcs. ....Roy From general-return-3420-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:14:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC128242A for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25022 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:14:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24670 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:14:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24661 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:14:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:14:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:14:24 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so5019213iym.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.218.4 with SMTP id ho4mr3705317icb.344.1304748844049; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:14:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <3116A002-6EA6-4971-B7AD-261BCC53D76B@gbiv.com> <9234135B-FD91-4E92-B4F5-6E6F7EB38A94@Holsman.NET> <4DC3E0FE.9060207@apache.org> From: Eric Sammer In-Reply-To: <4DC3E0FE.9060207@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8H7) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 23:14:01 -0700 Message-ID: <-4353636876961290469@unknownmsgid> Subject: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a0495ee70b04a2a983c3 --20cf3054a0495ee70b04a2a983c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of 100% compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this release has shipped. I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though there were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain behaviors have persisted so long. Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be made backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter to various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind that we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's changing, let's make with the refactoring party! Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? TIA. Sammer -Steve --20cf3054a0495ee70b04a2a983c3-- From general-return-3421-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:15:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 302362681 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26662 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:15:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26592 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:15:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26555 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:15:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:15:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:15:42 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=wBO+wz8rJqH7bxE2eCNJiVkMfx7ZAAt7e6r6lkyQgtpE7LCN05lW2R59 mmZbTlzSqOZ6R90lhpdWt1+c344VOpyAAREamzLy8uah5lLxlG5RFsYE7 1f+fCLG+3pKRB5O; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304748942; x=1336284942; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=z/hniA/H/pD6dEjnjBQJHrWx+7WamNMqZ3XFbGLD9lE=; b=o090sdpnyjn1Gf3wZKFOEnW8O0U1EPH2wYyD0ddqskxzfo+THCK8mGF1 O44ps4Z3AUR4AqlWlhL3yHZDKfR+UiMma4lXPKW8S88wNiB/GUWRKq4ud SqHkjbSlApwgC4V; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,330,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23536560" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 23:18:49 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwKremAu2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9JfwAqSFpVABKlSoAAOmcUAAAB5x+AAAGw4QD//8kPAA== Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 06:18:49 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <993A636D-D5F2-41C4-93DC-9B02E07F5B65@linkedin.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5A729181F8FBFF49AED759CFE64A1B78@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Allen, there are per job limits, and per user limits in this branch. (So, max capacity of -1 is for the queue, but within the queue, the per user limits come into picture.) If I remember right, the defaults were based on a certain assumption of how many users would be on a queue simultaneously. Of course this would need to be set in the site-specific config. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/6/11 7:31 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: > >On May 6, 2011, at 6:43 PM, Todd Papaioannou wrote: > >> Allen, >>=20 >> Can you provide some more details into what issues you are seeing with >>the >> capacity scheduler? Is it just the docs don't match the code, or are you >> seeing real issues with job scheduling? > > Jobs are definitely not getting the maximum number of task slots they >should be getting. I'm suspecting a bug with how max-limit of -1 queues >are handled. I'll actually be in the office next week to try and see if >I can figure out where things are going haywire. > > [I filed a bug on this a few weeks ago before I left for vacation. It >was basically ignored.] From general-return-3422-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:16:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67309291A for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28850 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:16:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28782 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28774 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:16:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:16:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:16:17 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so5019985iym.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.218.4 with SMTP id ho4mr3707053icb.344.1304748956547; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:15:56 -0700 (PDT) References: <4DC28B79.7000100@apache.org> <4DC3ED48.6000702@apache.org> From: Eric Sammer In-Reply-To: <4DC3ED48.6000702@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8H7) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 23:15:54 -0700 Message-ID: <2582414837582335589@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think I speak for all the other mrunit committers when I say we're happy to be the guinea pigs on this. On May 6, 2011, at 5:45 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 05/05/11 18:52, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Eric Yang wrote: >> >>> Git is powerful in maintaining different branch of the source code. >>> However, it will only work if the entire community is willing to move = to >>> git. Maintaining svn and git hybrid, is a time consuming task that we = are >>> paying in full price. Hadoop community should work smarter for the sou= rce >>> control. What do people think about fully adopting git instead of svn? >>> >> >> +1 for Git as a tool. But using git makes it even _more_ important that = we >> have a clearly defined release process that outlines which branches are >> meant to be released as official artifacts, and what the inclusion crite= ria >> for those branches should be. >> > > I'm +0.9995 for git: some bits I like, some bits I don't (it's awful for = binary data). And you need more than just a release process locked down, yo= u need the developers understanding following a good process. If you have w= ritten down process docs there, I'd love to see them. > > apache infrastructure are discussing git -what would be best would be to = start with a non-critical project, such as one or more of the moved contrib= projects (like MR-Unit), so we can see that it, gerrit, etc work well with= in the Hadoop developer world. > > > From general-return-3423-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:20:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38FB929E2 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30745 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30627 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30618 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:20:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:20:39 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so2499512pwi.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.42.8 with SMTP id j8mr5964680pbl.143.1304749218050; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:20:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.41.38 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 23:19:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9CFF0257-889B-44F4-9114-9C0534D1B7DE@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> <9CFF0257-889B-44F4-9114-9C0534D1B7DE@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 23:19:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Arun, I believe you're reading to much into my comment - it was absolutely well intent. And I think you have to abstain from such reprimands in the future. Should you have anything to say to me personally - pl. send me a separate email next time. With regards, Cos On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 21:51, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Cos, > > These are difficult times for the community as a whole, the least we can do it treat each other with respect and dignity in these public forums. > > Your comment was in very poor taste, please refrain from such in the future. > > Thank you, > Arun > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 6, 2011, at 8:35 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:46, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking to? >> >> Aren't you at Y! anymore, Eric? Wow! >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> E14 >>> >>> On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great job >>>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a >>>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two things: >>>> >>>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>>> >>>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook >>>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 >>>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port the >>>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>>> >>>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo Alto >>>> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following Wednesday, >>>> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC >>>> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC members Eli >>>> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>>> >>>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your name, >>>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward >>>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and you'll >>>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>>> submission process. >>>> >>>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>> >>>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF >>>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't make >>>> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>>> >>>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll see >>>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>> >>> > From general-return-3424-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:52:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABF8F2C5E for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46944 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:52:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46624 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:52:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46615 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:52:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:52:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:51:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=eqxPhR6LBYtyLyaKxrWsir7NONBK+QkhfFbePwfqSQChULR5FcH20tSz UYuF7ZXKzBbEXzVmXd7ji3aNosEoJvDWU5CVrpMTNtD45fEl1sQM6hbEV JnspxKoBiEwheEP; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304751118; x=1336287118; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=U0kCOOIrse4lPLhpCWb5uInfGuFlAgMnw3Q4l1aijfg=; b=nz5lg1Arp4fBuOWK3tb25O5kv2JGDMb9P7UkbyQDGFi9qB3Uw88LLeXy b4RUcQ1M2dogVtk11gmFm9bZBvgjzNXqFzhN4hFw3kWv6pY32ZhriLXrJ ZncuOOM99tcmHQ4; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,330,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22947753" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 6 May 2011 23:55:05 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCsM2u2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9Jf5R99lUAgAAUFYCAAh2PAIABM8OA//+VJoA= Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 06:55:05 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <-4353636876961290469@unknownmsgid> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <92EEA0D7A6D88E40AE00889D1187D627@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I will try to answer your questions.] Eric, I think the thread=20 "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C18C 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says Doug has proposed this earlier (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4BD 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect this would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared 0.20 Apache security branch. Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, because he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) =20 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the baby, although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna call your kid 20.100?" ;-). 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" Jan 12, 2011 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on Jan 12, 2011. So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the community agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward incompatibility, still have them in minor release. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone >into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of 100% >compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just >something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this release >has shipped. > > >I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict >about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >there >were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain behaviors >have persisted so long. > >Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be >made >backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter to >various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind that >we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's >changing, let's make with the refactoring party! > >Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? > >TIA. >Sammer > > > >-Steve From general-return-3425-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 06:58:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 615482CE4 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 06:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53997 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:58:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53957 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 06:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53949 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 06:58:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:58:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 06:57:55 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so2507666pzk.35 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.3.139 with SMTP id c11mr1827966pbc.277.1304751453174; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.38 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 23:57:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <-4353636876961290469@unknownmsgid> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 23:57:13 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zvFhJ81I8h8KRWLnJEnCnuoUpqM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Wow! Great compilation, Milind! Very nice to have the sequence of events ha= ndy. Thanks, Cos On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 23:55, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I > will try to answer your questions.] > > Eric, > > I think the thread > "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C1= 8C > 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your > questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: > > 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says Dou= g > has proposed this earlier > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4= BD > 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed > earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect this > would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) > > 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular > comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared 0.2= 0 > Apache security branch. > Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off > as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security > features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." > > 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) > > 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) > > 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, because > he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) > > 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the baby, > although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna cal= l > your kid 20.100?" ;-). > > 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how abou= t > something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" Jan > 12, 2011 > > 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x =A0 (where x is a J > 3)" on Jan > 12, 2011. > > So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the community > agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward > incompatibility, still have them in minor release. > > - milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: > >>On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> >>I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone >>into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of 100= % >>compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just >>something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this releas= e >>has shipped. >> >> >>I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict >>about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >>there >>were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain behavior= s >>have persisted so long. >> >>Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be >>made >>backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter to >>various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind tha= t >>we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's >>changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >> >>Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >> >>TIA. >>Sammer >> >> >> >>-Steve > > From general-return-3426-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 07:04:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31A0022AE for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 07:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56835 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 07:04:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56793 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 07:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56784 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 07:04:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 07:04:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 07:04:12 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Eeh2L4sfdlrCNo8z05yNkrqVYD6c0QRXowDY1m3IVex4G2JVOnoJ/ZBY la4zxxAAuSXY55KLTG+DszUSRw68saZ3i+pcBKGgG4uy8/Jxc0XpS9p+L kZ21AK3W16RBAfW; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304751852; x=1336287852; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7P6oT0NOXWu+bqZw7koGlyq9RmP0xiPEDsco02QJHFU=; b=mVucZF7C403BZz8apoU3Fpo+sK1cd9sz76KA03d9lQC7Lcn1dwd7kumB cWqXYKHG/ip6MiHCtbE4otiVnMsxPCWBBa7ubnUBli5ml43dYpbGGPzFY zkd9HFxd9/eWz4+; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,330,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23537006" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:07:18 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCsM2u2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9Jf5R99lUAgAAUFYCAAh2PAIABM8OA//+VJoCAAHbsgP//jH4A Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 07:07:17 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7B35465A06F1E9499AE8DDBCF1AA763F@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Kos. Archived mailing lists come in handy. Many thanks to Apache to have http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/6/11 11:57 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >Wow! Great compilation, Milind! Very nice to have the sequence of events >handy. > >Thanks, > Cos > >On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 23:55, Milind Bhandarkar > wrote: >> [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I >> will try to answer your questions.] >> >> Eric, >> >> I think the thread >>=20 >>"http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C1 >>8C >> 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your >> questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: >> >> 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says >>Doug >> has proposed this earlier >>=20 >>(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4 >>BD >> 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed >> earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect >>this >> would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) >> >> 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular >> comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared >>0.20 >> Apache security branch. >> Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off >> as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security >> features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." >> >> 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) >> >> 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) >> >> 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, >>because >> he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) >> >> 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the baby, >> although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna >>call >> your kid 20.100?" ;-). >> >> 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how >>about >> something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" Jan >> 12, 2011 >> >> 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on Jan >> 12, 2011. >> >> So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the community >> agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward >> incompatibility, still have them in minor release. >> >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >> >>>On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>> >>>I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone >>>into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of >>>100% >>>compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just >>>something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this >>>release >>>has shipped. >>> >>> >>>I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict >>>about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >>>there >>>were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain >>>behaviors >>>have persisted so long. >>> >>>Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be >>>made >>>backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter to >>>various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind >>>that >>>we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's >>>changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >>> >>>Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >>> >>>TIA. >>>Sammer >>> >>> >>> >>>-Steve >> >> From general-return-3427-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 19:03:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C08D288D for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 19:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56470 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 19:03:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56382 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 19:03:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56373 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 19:03:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 19:03:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 19:03:37 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=vznJt0S6tmMfrNLSA6PrKcjMeXt0rZ3QW9IoF/4wxXvLHv6LmamYmTNJ FGxbC9H794IeycUc99jjnZPpAFOgz6h+dIJx7O5FWjxyeDaxSOYOXMqt4 yScuLEY4ezG3s7F; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304795017; x=1336331017; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=z8q14hCd77IEGiImE4hk4NAKMUdXp3ULAxYji9b11IU=; b=W3lUdp7x+uLSwLLwKjMBDwx+d/gRUjTcQpj36m7OC2r/yqHZNLH6PUf4 ibEDMuTgWBh44+k3VUcpJA5a3WVDb8nKF2n4BrNA5zW1ifd3bXdoOlKI2 a1TMAeQCcXh49kv; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,331,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22953484" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Sat, 7 May 2011 12:06:45 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCoHKs40jdRozskC+8soYJjDqwpR9roiAgAAAxwCAAAUFAIAAAdSAgAAC2wCAAALqAIABUn0AgAAf0oCAAdIfAIAAEFOAgAAMkICAAEBYgIAA1ZgA Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 19:06:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On May 6, 2011, at 11:18 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Allen, there are per job limits, and per user limits in this branch. (So, > max capacity of -1 is for the queue, but within the queue, the per user > limits come into picture.) If I remember right, the defaults were based o= n > a certain assumption of how many users would be on a queue simultaneously= . > Of course this would need to be set in the site-specific config. Yes, I'm aware of the changes. What I'm basically saying is that even wit= h those new limits taken into consideration, the math doesn't seem to hold = up. From general-return-3428-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 23:50:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56FB02711 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 23:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11318 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 23:50:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11204 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 23:50:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11196 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 23:50:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 23:50:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 23:50:43 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5535249iwr.35 for ; Sat, 07 May 2011 16:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.229.135 with SMTP id ji7mr4206992icb.143.1304812220614; Sat, 07 May 2011 16:50:20 -0700 (PDT) References: From: Eric Sammer In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8H7) Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 16:50:17 -0700 Message-ID: <-1022679743169743093@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Milind: Thanks for the pointer. I remember this thread. I guess my question was unrelated to the specific release and more about the general mode of development under normal release circumstances (ie. do we permit backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this something we've allowed just for the 203 release?). I think it's important to be clear about what the MO is so end users can plan upgrades appropriately. Thanks! Sammer On May 6, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I > will try to answer your questions.] > > Eric, > > I think the thread > "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C18C > 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your > questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: > > 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says Doug > has proposed this earlier > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4BD > 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed > earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect this > would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) > > 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular > comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared 0.20 > Apache security branch. > Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off > as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security > features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." > > 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) > > 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) > > 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, because > he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) > > 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the baby, > although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna call > your kid 20.100?" ;-). > > 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how about > something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" Jan > 12, 2011 > > 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on Jan > 12, 2011. > > So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the community > agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward > incompatibility, still have them in minor release. > > - milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: > >> On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> >> I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't gone >> into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of 100% >> compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just >> something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this release >> has shipped. >> >> >> I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict >> about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >> there >> were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain behaviors >> have persisted so long. >> >> Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be >> made >> backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter to >> various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind that >> we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's >> changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >> >> Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >> >> TIA. >> Sammer >> >> >> >> -Steve > From general-return-3429-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 01:36:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4469B2F22 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 01:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58464 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 01:36:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58408 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 01:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58400 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 01:36:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 01:36:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 01:36:35 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so2791828pve.35 for ; Sat, 07 May 2011 18:36:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=mbn66dj47gc20U3UpvliEe9Lnu/63l8uT9W9sMLCH/c=; b=U++MXnMmpzQtFTi6+ZyqFIjUPvFVhDgUBSFBfceDKXdEi5OzlyFG9vT56tRa5I76dF tTrIYsL/ZqLNsOScGDkPTkUod37KtcaWyW8/ptZMFRFBROnfSa41Xt2aRRvjsxZzWe8d ZZMHId+bxRvNKfWVM2OffZet9hv/ipr11sfAc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=sfnzQ6SUgaNcYkzXJpNdH87sVbVQNgyDOCvC9xnlERQCqbWyBahaLOTveqsRmDPgLx NZOQAIDDKptMPlLJbNL3DN7krAjuI9BobzTAnZHX1UviMyrPUR3ukeT+vQAWiOT05G5m mOeoSMdI7ByARYeTs+jzV2PImr8FCyUEEcMVI= Received: by 10.142.149.20 with SMTP id w20mr2992655wfd.137.1304818573457; Sat, 07 May 2011 18:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (124-148-142-55.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.148.142.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d3sm3136768pbh.73.2011.05.07.18.36.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 May 2011 18:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <-1022679743169743093@unknownmsgid> Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 11:36:04 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5A50CB87-211B-4517-8E77-4AE0EEDC24F9@Holsman.NET> References: <-1022679743169743093@unknownmsgid> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 8, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > do we permit > backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this > something we've allowed just for the 203 release? good question. do we allow incompatible (smallish) features to be added to a 20.x = release. hoping that they will eventually be put into trunk at a later stage. and if we need a process or something around it, or will just act on = good faith that it will occur.= From general-return-3430-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 05:42:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8386B3B7F for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 05:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45845 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 05:41:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45506 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 05:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45493 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 05:41:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 05:41:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 05:41:50 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so2202597yxd.35 for ; Sat, 07 May 2011 22:41:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OKFDB1CnEXWwnKGi3kjZABUFerE0NradlI5M3RX7kuo=; b=kHJ69z7cxpXvlq4WdO6eIXZFeMfx3owTS5DLm2yZLz/6xdoPfqZwhcnqy4YKChPhSJ BrAh9JsG9z364IfgDxvO8a8JgVZTnlW+4odYLyc03hoTRDFK2uqsdz0MoXC1FKv+KuBY c7P61UAb97VTpltCkISWd3a9kSe7RE/81OnBE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MyZ0FlhSYqfC0zwCOT5PmF/AC1o9HzmVZO+8gLwSkRYQpMtOCMde7FqkdHbdpKZSDW IOGiqIC3VEcW3xf+ab2EGnTTnima8ozukWt0fvwT2cUsln6b5kd0vvv7mYUS8DfQe43y fusuaQ/Z7andNSOVtW+mE2MJY2+zkTbYHP8Ig= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.109.19 with SMTP id r19mr918263yhg.289.1304833289001; Sat, 07 May 2011 22:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.124.12 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2011 22:41:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 22:41:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c5fae9c5604a2bd2c6f --0023547c8c5fae9c5604a2bd2c6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -1 for rc1 I downloaded and ran the test target 3 times. First run failed because my umask is defaulted to 0002, which is a known problem HADOOP-5050 committed to 0.21 but not 0.20. Set umask to 0022 and re-ran test twice. Both resulted in failure. Here is the list of failed tests: [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobTrackerRestart FAILED (timeout) [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobTrackerRestartWithLostTracker FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobTrackerSafeMode FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestMiniMRMapRedDebugScript FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestRecoveryManager FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestTTMemoryReporting FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestTaskTrackerLocalization FAILED [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED I am in favor of releasing hadoop-0.20.203. And we run a version of this release on a large cluster at eBay. I know it works. I understand the controversy behind it. I regret it hasn't been developed in a true community way. I think it nevertheless adds value to Apache Hadoop. Lets just make sure it passes the tests. Thanks, --Konstantin On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I think its a good idea to release hadoop-0.20.203. It moves Apache Hadoop > a step forward. > > Looks like the technical difficulties are resolved now with latest Arun's > commits. > Being a superset of hadoop-0.20.2 it can be considered based on one of the > official Apache releases. > I don't think there was a lack of discussions on the lists about the issues > included in the release candidate. Todd did a thorough review of the entire > security branch. Many developers participated in discussions. > Agreeing with Stack I wish HBase was considered a primary target for Hadoop > support. But it is not realistic to have it in hadoop-0.20.203. > I have some experience running a version of this release candidate on a > large cluster. It works. I would add a couple of patches, which make it run > on Windows for me like HADOOP-7110, HADOOP-7126. But those are not blockers. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> On May 3, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except >> >> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are relevant/ >> >> necessary, I'll check with Cos. Other than that hadoop-0.20.203 now a >> >> superset of hadoop-0.20.2. >> >> >> > >> > Missed adding HADOOP-5759 to that list, I'll check with Amareshwari >> before committing. >> > >> > Arun >> >> Thanks for doing this so fast Arun. >> >> > --0023547c8c5fae9c5604a2bd2c6f-- From general-return-3431-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 05:49:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AF0132A6 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 05:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52798 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 05:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52356 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 05:49:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52348 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 05:49:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 05:49:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 05:49:05 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=PKboxcdpv76KZLmDmMzMcn+Z5dZNyYVXoQWPtiwrMkeEiUGAwXIh1Hdy uPPhbt5CJhaoaw4YnCYmZjNELfvRvVo94T4q2TTFWgRedMM7Pk+qSU6y+ 5utBYIIOC5s+K5A; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1304833745; x=1336369745; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dO2QFKjqAOKU8F6Pmw0bQIXV6f6FNuEC5iYzVb21xII=; b=pJyZb107pLqaP9FDN3DaUUJjYvokbirTv1pAo0fmpC7p9wrOPgn5ERiq lNC4USO2GwfJV+VrnJ2k6MiGsh5Ha7Bn3XLcfi5m2GVPJaLyH5ou4sZ1K kP8xljmX1k6u+xd; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,333,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22957725" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Sat, 7 May 2011 22:52:14 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHMCsM2u2v/kISbSx+vh7BYIk9Jf5R99lUAgAAUFYCAAh2PAIABM8OA//+VJoCAAZH4gP//7ssA Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 05:52:13 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <-1022679743169743093@unknownmsgid> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <43F2F7A90BA20A4A8EE46A33E51A302A@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 [Mentioning again: I am not on the PMC, and this email contains non-binding opinions based on my reading the general@hadoop.apache.org emails.] It is my understanding that, from the beginning, the 0.20+security was always treated as an exception to the normal (I.e. Pre-0.20) release process. (This has been confirmed by the mailing list threads, in which many of those who are objecting to this release now - stating that it has violated norms - have consented, actually argued for, breaking the norms.) For whatever I have read on this mailing list before the vote for this release, it looked like most of the community agreed that what Yahoo! Had produced on their own branch, outside of Apache trunk, was important contribution, and a release based on that would be a good idea, and that a one-time release should proceed. (After all, whichever organization the contributors belong to, many seem to indicate that they feel ashamed not having an Apache release in more than a year.) >From many emails on this thread, it has been clear to me, that it is a one time concession given for parting ways from the normal process, and I hope everyone understands that this is supposed to make Apache Hadoop releases relevant once again. So, to cut it short, the 0.20.203 backward incompatibilities etc have no bearing on the "normal" process, in which no backward incompatibilities should be allowed in minor releases. To answer your specific question, I have no reason to believe that 0.22.1 could be backward incompatible with 0.22.0.=20 =20 - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/7/11 4:50 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >Milind: > >Thanks for the pointer. I remember this thread. I guess my question >was unrelated to the specific release and more about the general mode >of development under normal release circumstances (ie. do we permit >backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this >something we've allowed just for the 203 release?). > >I think it's important to be clear about what the MO is so end users >can plan upgrades appropriately. > >Thanks! >Sammer > >On May 6, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >wrote: > >> [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I >> will try to answer your questions.] >> >> Eric, >> >> I think the thread >>=20 >>"http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C1 >>8C >> 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your >> questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: >> >> 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says >>Doug >> has proposed this earlier >>=20 >>(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4 >>BD >> 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed >> earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect >>this >> would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) >> >> 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular >> comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared >>0.20 >> Apache security branch. >> Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off >> as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security >> features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." >> >> 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) >> >> 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) >> >> 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, >>because >> he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) >> >> 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the baby, >> although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna >>call >> your kid 20.100?" ;-). >> >> 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how >>about >> something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" Jan >> 12, 2011 >> >> 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on Jan >> 12, 2011. >> >> So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the community >> agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward >> incompatibility, still have them in minor release. >> >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >> >>> On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>> >>> I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't >>>gone >>> into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of >>>100% >>> compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's just >>> something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this >>>release >>> has shipped. >>> >>> >>> I was under the impression that the community has been extremely strict >>> about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >>> there >>> were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain >>>behaviors >>> have persisted so long. >>> >>> Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can be >>> made >>> backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter >>>to >>> various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind >>>that >>> we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if that's >>> changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >>> >>> Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >>> >>> TIA. >>> Sammer >>> >>> >>> >>> -Steve >> From general-return-3432-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 17:53:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4B663B04 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 17:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79913 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 17:53:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79853 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 17:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79845 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 17:53:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:53:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:53:45 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c144.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.144]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p48HrBnO069878 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304877192; bh=mB0wTn1vc/mDLC9Xisa7psGAyst7x05I9sBCSi7gKKg=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=CsE6itbxjPhujEko8makgzlnKPLWXXTCxxsTG6toVUrjoLJJopmFTHVtVB5DzJNz6 QhpEE1EcqwCR+C1gQgsVtYVFi284tCbmgA91zWIAOkfxblrcnOlbp6yGktEMI6vTiK vvwl1Z7mbGfNPQLtSZOg07/aQ5d38sw9MfC63msY= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 10:53:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5E9CCC0F-AD6F-4BE1-83CF-ACDD4D55BE75@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Folks, I guess this requires a clarification. 1) Of course I remain at Yahoo. 2) The yahoo hadoop team is in not way associated with this event. This = email chain is the first we've heard of it. Sorry for our confusion. 3) Of course we're always happy to see folks investing in Hadoop. It = will be interesting to see if this proves an effective approach. =20 Thanks E14 On May 6, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:46, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >>=20 >> Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking = to? >=20 > Aren't you at Y! anymore, Eric? Wow! >=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> E14 >>=20 >> On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>=20 >>> Hey, >>>=20 >>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a = great job >>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also = done a >>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After = reading >>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two = things: >>>=20 >>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>>=20 >>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and = Facebook >>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down = the 13 >>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) = forward-port the >>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>>=20 >>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our = Palo Alto >>> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following = Wednesday, >>> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. = PMC >>> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC = members Eli >>> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>>=20 >>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your = name, >>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. = Forward >>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and = you'll >>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>> submission process. >>>=20 >>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>=20 >>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the = Cloudera SF >>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you = can't make >>> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>>=20 >>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>>=20 >>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and = I'll see >>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3433-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 18:13:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BD5830CA for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 18:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87331 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 18:13:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87276 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 18:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87267 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 18:13:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 18:13:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 18:13:01 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c144.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.144]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p48IAMuT074091 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 11:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304878223; bh=u92a/mqwSr8ZvbhL58FAeY2iwh8uzmxP+fNOZjrrP8E=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=s8b4d4CiFL408OYjMODKlGp9hVBV5eh3xyRAtWGh2EC4Mx6loS6GQLuG5ztrXSQZw tz5fIVy6o1HpZdeyQs8xbrA1Hejw9aR9GFghDu1icLZN7v/B8RCmURZsBSrJP5M2v2 I5Bdob3izfpHfpQR/ggBBdydDgIRJDc8v0KcMVc4= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 11:10:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <215257F9-1F66-4A4D-B4CF-8999DC509866@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I'd agree with this too. [same disclaimer as milind, not on PMC] In general one would not expect to see an incompatible change added in a = dot release (0.24.1 0.24.2). I'd expect anything like that to require = community discussion and support. As milind summarized, we seem to have support for the addition of = security to 20. The existing mechanism of the required release vote = will confirm or deny that. I think it is important that compatible enhancements to hadoop are = allowed into dot releases. This is something that we've discussed but = never finalized in the community. It is the desire to put improvements = into users hands more quickly that the next major release that drives = orgs to produce private releases of hadoop. In general, I think it is = fair that such changes go into trunk first. Exceptions to that also = need discussion and support IMO. I think the key to making progress is discussion and the idea that = majority support, not consensus is what is needed to make exceptions to = our process. Process is useful, it reduces friction. Process without = exception is stifling. =20 On May 7, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > [Mentioning again: I am not on the PMC, and this email contains > non-binding opinions based on my reading the general@hadoop.apache.org > emails.] >=20 > It is my understanding that, from the beginning, the 0.20+security was > always treated as an exception to the normal (I.e. Pre-0.20) release > process. (This has been confirmed by the mailing list threads, in = which > many of those who are objecting to this release now - stating that it = has > violated norms - have consented, actually argued for, breaking the = norms.) >=20 > For whatever I have read on this mailing list before the vote for this > release, it looked like most of the community agreed that what Yahoo! = Had > produced on their own branch, outside of Apache trunk, was important > contribution, and a release based on that would be a good idea, and = that a > one-time release should proceed. (After all, whichever organization = the > contributors belong to, many seem to indicate that they feel ashamed = not > having an Apache release in more than a year.) >=20 > =46rom many emails on this thread, it has been clear to me, that it is = a one > time concession given for parting ways from the normal process, and I = hope > everyone understands that this is supposed to make Apache Hadoop = releases > relevant once again. >=20 > So, to cut it short, the 0.20.203 backward incompatibilities etc have = no > bearing on the "normal" process, in which no backward = incompatibilities > should be allowed in minor releases. To answer your specific question, = I > have no reason to believe that 0.22.1 could be backward incompatible = with > 0.22.0.=20 >=20 > - milind >=20 > --=20 > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 5/7/11 4:50 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >=20 >> Milind: >>=20 >> Thanks for the pointer. I remember this thread. I guess my question >> was unrelated to the specific release and more about the general mode >> of development under normal release circumstances (ie. do we permit >> backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this >> something we've allowed just for the 203 release?). >>=20 >> I think it's important to be clear about what the MO is so end users >> can plan upgrades appropriately. >>=20 >> Thanks! >> Sammer >>=20 >> On May 6, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar = >> wrote: >>=20 >>> [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, = I >>> will try to answer your questions.] >>>=20 >>> Eric, >>>=20 >>> I think the thread >>>=20 >>> = "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C1 >>> 8C >>> 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your >>> questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: >>>=20 >>> 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. = Says >>> Doug >>> has proposed this earlier >>>=20 >>> = (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3C4 >>> BD >>> 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed >>> earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect >>> this >>> would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) >>>=20 >>> 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular >>> comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a = shared >>> 0.20 >>> Apache security branch. >>> Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off >>> as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security >>> features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." >>>=20 >>> 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) >>>=20 >>> 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) >>>=20 >>> 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, >>> because >>> he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) >>>=20 >>> 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the = baby, >>> although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're = gonna >>> call >>> your kid 20.100?" ;-). >>>=20 >>> 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how >>> about >>> something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" = Jan >>> 12, 2011 >>>=20 >>> 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on = Jan >>> 12, 2011. >>>=20 >>> So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the = community >>> agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward >>> incompatibility, still have them in minor release. >>>=20 >>> - milind >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>> +1-650-776-3167 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't >>>> gone >>>> into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees = of >>>> 100% >>>> compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's = just >>>> something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this >>>> release >>>> has shipped. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> I was under the impression that the community has been extremely = strict >>>> about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I = though >>>> there >>>> were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain >>>> behaviors >>>> have persisted so long. >>>>=20 >>>> Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can = be >>>> made >>>> backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very = counter >>>> to >>>> various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the = mind >>>> that >>>> we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if = that's >>>> changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >>>>=20 >>>> Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >>>>=20 >>>> TIA. >>>> Sammer >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -Steve >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3434-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 18:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D92C131E5 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 18:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16278 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 18:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16192 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 18:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16184 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 18:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 18:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 18:44:22 +0000 Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so3692618pxi.2 for ; Sun, 08 May 2011 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.37.36 with SMTP id v4mr1825715pbj.76.1304880242057; Sun, 08 May 2011 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.41.38 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2011 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5E9CCC0F-AD6F-4BE1-83CF-ACDD4D55BE75@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6D26A411-537F-4719-B95F-5C0A68077F34@yahoo-inc.com> <5E9CCC0F-AD6F-4BE1-83CF-ACDD4D55BE75@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 11:43:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TJWy8hekiuNj_FPlrjEoe_VOgzo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for clarification Eric! I got a private email suggesting that my original comment might have created certain friction and whatnot. For those who suspect me of evil deeds I want to clarify my response too - I was genuinely surprised by your reply to the OP and put this amusement in the email. I am glad that we can put this confusion behind us now! Thanks, Cos On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:53, Eric Baldeschwieler wr= ote: > Hi Folks, > > I guess this requires a clarification. > > 1) Of course I remain at Yahoo. > > 2) The yahoo hadoop team is in not way associated with this event. =A0Thi= s email chain is the first we've heard of it. =A0Sorry for our confusion. > > 3) Of course we're always happy to see folks investing in Hadoop. =A0It w= ill be interesting to see if this proves an effective approach. > > Thanks > > E14 > > On May 6, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 17:46, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >>> Hi Jeff, >>> >>> Could you put me in contact with the folks from yahoo you are talking t= o? >> >> Aren't you at Y! anymore, Eric? Wow! >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> E14 >>> >>> On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great= job >>>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done= a >>>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two th= ings: >>>> >>>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>>> >>>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Faceb= ook >>>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the = 13 >>>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port= the >>>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>>> >>>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Pal= o Alto >>>> and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following Wedn= esday, >>>> 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC >>>> members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC membe= rs Eli >>>> Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>>> >>>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your n= ame, >>>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forw= ard >>>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and yo= u'll >>>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>>> submission process. >>>> >>>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>> >>>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera= SF >>>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't= make >>>> it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>>> >>>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll= see >>>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>> >>> > > From general-return-3435-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 8 19:56:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECFA63CA9 for ; Sun, 8 May 2011 19:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56576 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56525 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56517 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 May 2011 19:56:22 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1973164eya.35 for ; Sun, 08 May 2011 12:56:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.50.196 with SMTP id z44mr2887523eeb.227.1304884560838; Sun, 08 May 2011 12:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2011 12:56:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5A50CB87-211B-4517-8E77-4AE0EEDC24F9@Holsman.NET> References: <-1022679743169743093@unknownmsgid> <5A50CB87-211B-4517-8E77-4AE0EEDC24F9@Holsman.NET> Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 12:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On May 8, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> do we permit >> backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this >> something we've allowed just for the 203 release? > > good question. > do we allow incompatible (smallish) features to be added to a 20.x release. > hoping that they will eventually be put into trunk at a later stage. > and if we need a process or something around it, or will just act on good faith that it will occur. We do allow it, as the 203 release shows. I don't think we need an official process, our existing practice of filing a jira with the appropriate fix version is sufficient. And this seems to be happening already for all changes to future 20x releases. Compatibility is just one reason it's important that features be developed on trunk first. Security and other enhancements were developed on 20 and forward ported to trunk. Almost two years later the forward porting is still not complete - if we released from trunk today, it would not support security. Ditto for append. Some people who work on HBase consider the code in branch-20-append to be more reliable than the code on trunk. This is the primary reason why people are currently on 20.x releases. People are of course free to contribute to Apache on whatever branch they please, but I think as a development community we need to try to make sure a future release off trunk is not a regression against previous releases. This won't happen unless we invest in trunk. I support a release from branch-20-security, I just wanted to see the work go into trunk first. Ie I think the staging matters. (and I agree with Ray wrt the version scheme but that's independent). Fortunately, I don't think we're far off. The vast majority of security work is in trunk (thanks to all those who did the porting), there's probably only 50 to 100 bugs/enhancements in branch-20-security not yet in trunk, and the append code (or rather sync) to support HBase just needs some tests and debugging. I agree with Eric that is is the desire to put improvements into users hands more quickly that drives orgs to produce releases of Hadoop outside Apache. I think the best way to address this is to get solid releases coming off trunk on a regular basis again. Hence the push to close out 22 and work on getting trunk in shape. Also, as a development community, we're at our best when collaborating on trunk. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3436-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 21:37:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED6DA49DD for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46218 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:37:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46128 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46120 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 21:37:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:37:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:37:18 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so7455233bwz.35 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:36:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.19.65 with SMTP id z1mr1004865bka.202.1304977016867; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.37.204 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:36:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325558c3687caea04a2dea329 --000325558c3687caea04a2dea329 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, Michael Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been waiting to get involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo Alto and want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. Regards, Jeff On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great job > of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a > great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading > through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two things: > > 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk > 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again > > To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook > would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 > (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port the > work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. > > Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo > Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following > Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. > PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC members > Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. > > Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your name, > now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward > porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and you'll > have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and > submission process. > > To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF > offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't > make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. > > Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! > > Regards, > Jeff > > p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll see > about how we can teleconference you into the event. > > > --000325558c3687caea04a2dea329-- From general-return-3437-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 10:30:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8EB65742 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84385 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 10:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84332 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 10:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84324 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 10:30:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:30:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:30:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5884C1BA75C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:29:52 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a7otMClnoYiv for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:29:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C9A1BA757 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:29:51 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305628179.82761@0fnggZPH7zafn6yhccly9w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4AATcIP000110 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:29:38 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:29:38 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4AATcIP000110 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache Hadoop Compatibility: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.pdf It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an improvement. I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us Licensing -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, Naming -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's important to make clear it is a derivative work. -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" Compatibility -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache Source tree, -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and future tests pass -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the compatibility testing -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" bugreps to make them more formal. Certification -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say "Certified" -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they mean by this This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module that can be used to test real deployments. From general-return-3438-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:06:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05B2F5902 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55892 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:06:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55833 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55825 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:06:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:25 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:06:04 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Steve Loughran Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:06:22 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] development process of Hadoop Thread-Index: AcwPPO0kpPpTBfNVTQusiHpJlrubyQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DC402B7.8070900@uci.cu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/6/11 7:16 AM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: >> >> >+1 for Git > >We migrated from SVN to Git for our completed infrastructure, for many >reason: >- Git use much less space than SVN, all the changes are in a single .git FWIW, svn 1.7 will have a single DB file too. Though that project has some chaos at the moment too and the release of 1.7 may be soon or a ways away. It is still slow over the network compared to git. It is also adding 'svn patch'. >- Git is awesome for branching >- Another great advantage is that there are many developers that know >Git, and how the development process can be greatly improved. There are also many developers who know svn, and many who don't know git. That is not a clear win. > >PostgreSQL, one of my favorites open source projects that I use on my >daily work, migrated the development process to Git from CVS. Almost anything is better than CVS. I don't feel that the primary cause of hadoop's situation is due to svn. Git would help with merging patches that have become stale for sure, and especially help on the client side for developers who need maintain many concurrent contexts. But there are many significant process issues at the heart of the problem that are not due to the tools. > >Regards. > >--=20 >Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) > University of Information Sciences, > La Habana, Cuba > Linux User # 418229 > http://about.me/marcosortiz > From general-return-3439-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 19:41:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BECAE5C57 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21639 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21583 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21575 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 19:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.19] (HELO EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:41:41 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.19]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:41:20 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:41:40 -0700 Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwPSjxJUiMi2kaTQZGGiW1fMVt2Ow== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <215257F9-1F66-4A4D-B4CF-8999DC509866@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/8/11 11:10 AM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >I'd agree with this too. [same disclaimer as milind, not on PMC] > >In general one would not expect to see an incompatible change added in a >dot release (0.24.1 0.24.2). I'd expect anything like that to require >community discussion and support. > >As milind summarized, we seem to have support for the addition of >security to 20. The existing mechanism of the required release vote will >confirm or deny that. > >I think it is important that compatible enhancements to hadoop are >allowed into dot releases. This is something that we've discussed but >never finalized in the community. It is the desire to put improvements >into users hands more quickly that the next major release that drives >orgs to produce private releases of hadoop. In general, I think it is >fair that such changes go into trunk first. Exceptions to that also need >discussion and support IMO. As an observer, this is a very important observation. Sure, the default is that dot releases are bugfix-onl. But exceptions to these rules are sometimes required and often beneficial to the health of the project. Performance enhancements, minor features, and other items are sometimes very low risk and the barrier to getting them to users earlier should be lower. =20 These issues are the sort of things that get into non-Apache releases quickly and drive the community away from the Apache release. Its been well proven through those vehicles that back-porting minor features and improvements from trunk to an old release can be done safely. > >I think the key to making progress is discussion and the idea that >majority support, not consensus is what is needed to make exceptions to >our process. Process is useful, it reduces friction. Process without >exception is stifling. Absolutely -- for a subset of process exceptions, a lazy majority would be much more useful than consensus. Others are much more dangerous (backwards compatibility breakage) > >On May 7, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > >> [Mentioning again: I am not on the PMC, and this email contains >> non-binding opinions based on my reading the general@hadoop.apache.org >> emails.] >>=20 >> It is my understanding that, from the beginning, the 0.20+security was >> always treated as an exception to the normal (I.e. Pre-0.20) release >> process. (This has been confirmed by the mailing list threads, in which >> many of those who are objecting to this release now - stating that it >>has >> violated norms - have consented, actually argued for, breaking the >>norms.) >>=20 >> For whatever I have read on this mailing list before the vote for this >> release, it looked like most of the community agreed that what Yahoo! >>Had >> produced on their own branch, outside of Apache trunk, was important >> contribution, and a release based on that would be a good idea, and >>that a >> one-time release should proceed. (After all, whichever organization the >> contributors belong to, many seem to indicate that they feel ashamed not >> having an Apache release in more than a year.) >>=20 >> From many emails on this thread, it has been clear to me, that it is a >>one >> time concession given for parting ways from the normal process, and I >>hope >> everyone understands that this is supposed to make Apache Hadoop >>releases >> relevant once again. >>=20 >> So, to cut it short, the 0.20.203 backward incompatibilities etc have no >> bearing on the "normal" process, in which no backward incompatibilities >> should be allowed in minor releases. To answer your specific question, I >> have no reason to believe that 0.22.1 could be backward incompatible >>with >> 0.22.0.=20 >>=20 >> - milind >>=20 >> --=20 >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 5/7/11 4:50 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >>=20 >>> Milind: >>>=20 >>> Thanks for the pointer. I remember this thread. I guess my question >>> was unrelated to the specific release and more about the general mode >>> of development under normal release circumstances (ie. do we permit >>> backward incompatible changes between 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 or is this >>> something we've allowed just for the 203 release?). >>>=20 >>> I think it's important to be clear about what the MO is so end users >>> can plan upgrades appropriately. >>>=20 >>> Thanks! >>> Sammer >>>=20 >>> On May 6, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>> >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> [I am not on PMC, but seeing that PMC may be busy with other issues, I >>>> will try to answer your questions.] >>>>=20 >>>> Eric, >>>>=20 >>>> I think the thread >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>"http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3 >>>>C1 >>>> 8C >>>> 5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com%3E" will answer your >>>> questions. Here is the timeline as I see it: >>>>=20 >>>> 1. Arun proposes to create a release from the security patchset. Says >>>> Doug >>>> has proposed this earlier >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3 >>>>C4 >>>> BD >>>> 1DFEA.5020908@apache.org%3E April 23, 2010) ("This has been proposed >>>> earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect >>>> this >>>> would have on development on trunk.") (August 24, 2010) >>>>=20 >>>> 2. Lots of +1s, between August 24 to August 30 2010. One particular >>>> comment is from Tom White: "I think it would be good to have a shared >>>> 0.20 >>>> Apache security branch. >>>> Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off >>>> as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security >>>> features sooner (and want to use an Apache release)." >>>>=20 >>>> 3. Arun volunteers to create a release (August 30, 2010) >>>>=20 >>>> 4. Doug reminds Arun. (October 15, 2010) >>>>=20 >>>> 5. Arun apologizes for not creating a branch because he was busy, >>>> because >>>> he had a baby. (January 11, 2011) >>>>=20 >>>> 6. Lots of discussion about what to call it (the release, not the >>>>baby, >>>> although I had a good laugh at Patrick Angeles's email: "You're gonna >>>> call >>>> your kid 20.100?" ;-). >>>>=20 >>>> 7. Arun proposes to call it 0.20.100: "I'm open to suggestions - how >>>> about >>>> something like 20.100 to show that it's a big jump? Anything else?" >>>>Jan >>>> 12, 2011 >>>>=20 >>>> 8. Among others, Eli says: "+1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3)" on >>>>Jan >>>> 12, 2011. >>>>=20 >>>> So, as you can see, even if this release is called 0.20.x, the >>>>community >>>> agreed that these are valuable patches to have, and despite backward >>>> incompatibility, still have them in minor release. >>>>=20 >>>> - milind >>>>=20 >>>> -- >>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>> +1-650-776-3167 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On 5/6/11 11:14 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> On May 6, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> I understand Eli's concerns that putting stuff in there that hasn't >>>>> gone >>>>> into trunk yet is danger. However, as the team makes no guarantees of >>>>> 100% >>>>> compatibility between releases, I don't think it's critical. It's >>>>>just >>>>> something that needs to be addressed -which can be done after this >>>>> release >>>>> has shipped. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I was under the impression that the community has been extremely >>>>>strict >>>>> about compatibility between minor version bumps in the past. I though >>>>> there >>>>> were specific guarantees and that was one of the reasons certain >>>>> behaviors >>>>> have persisted so long. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Does this mean API changes can be made in minor releases and it can >>>>>be >>>>> made >>>>> backward compatible in future releases? That seems very, very counter >>>>> to >>>>> various conversations that have happened in the past. I'm of the mind >>>>> that >>>>> we should continue to promise what we've always promised and if >>>>>that's >>>>> changing, let's make with the refactoring party! >>>>>=20 >>>>> Can some PMC'ers clarify this one for me? >>>>>=20 >>>>> TIA. >>>>> Sammer >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> -Steve >>>>=20 >>=20 > From general-return-3440-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 21:29:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D8E4551C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 753 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 703 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 695 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 21:29:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:29:05 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so8915987bwz.35 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.136.217 with SMTP id s25mr505937bkt.13.1305062924090; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:28:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.13 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:28:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <215257F9-1F66-4A4D-B4CF-8999DC509866@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:28:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd8d2ffff7e04a2f2a319 --0015175cd8d2ffff7e04a2f2a319 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > > As an observer, this is a very important observation. Sure, the default > is that dot releases are bugfix-onl. But exceptions to these rules are > sometimes required and often beneficial to the health of the project. > Performance enhancements, minor features, and other items are sometimes > very low risk and the barrier to getting them to users earlier should be > lower. > I agree whole-heartedly. > These issues are the sort of things that get into non-Apache releases > quickly and drive the community away from the Apache release. Its been > well proven through those vehicles that back-porting minor features and > improvements from trunk to an old release can be done safely. However, one shouldn't understate the difficulty of agreeing on the risk-reward tradeoff here. While risk is mostly technical, reward may vary widely based on the userbase or organization. For example, everyone would agree that security was a very risky feature to add to 20, with known backward compatibilities and a lot of fallout. For some people (both CDH and YDH), the security features were an absolute necessity on a tight timeline, so the risk-reward decision was clear -- I've heard from many users, though, that they saw none of the reward from security and wished they hadn't had to endure the resulting changes and bugs within the 0.20 series. Another example is the 0.20-append patch series, which is indispensable for the HBase community but seen as overly risky by those who do not use HBase. So, while I'm in favor of "sustaining" release series like 0.20-security in theory, I also think we need a clear inclusion criteria for such branches. As I said in a previous email, the criteria used to be "low risk compatible bug fixes only" with a vote process for any exceptions. 0.20-security is obviously entirely different, but as yet remains undefined (it's way more than just "security"). -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0015175cd8d2ffff7e04a2f2a319-- From general-return-3441-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 23:54:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA8515B74 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45217 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 23:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45150 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 23:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45142 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 23:54:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:54:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:54:06 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so5582861qwj.35 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:53:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=p/QXLVMeoy11TBW2OhQlGEWUAJQCOhtIKyj3bGqCpLo=; b=SUMQT6/zJB67wxbvBTTBAO+Oy4oqakOxK4rviR6V1nGmrao96+B8LD6tgBWwZsoxmx GAgKZ2tWDHmAQjgtitU0I7B/9kyL85Flj5xBzDB1CZMPjKfQfauSy6lFhKL0rP6uCF59 whySn6LUmnmn0otYDCSbb4WLOUhdMJwQoYGsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=kcKyC+Bh+VO/VIcG6GY+vacWnWh10MB72oUFqNtjEXh2ta5G8oIfXXWeTtH266Hbay hZ/bXW8gXwJOfVOkr2NDj5L9MA/yXD87oWW6V6AWVtDKq6rJDQg8eayJGaDju2jSuJv6 QJKLHmKsP2Tuge49qMGBZWSjAVzTATIvBjCeQ= Received: by 10.224.181.206 with SMTP id bz14mr7414277qab.353.1305071624531; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.95] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm6268588qck.38.2011.05.10.16.53.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2011 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:53:40 +1000 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman We are not afraid of the truth, in fact we plan on taking the truth out = for a nice meal while we persuade it to adopt our views From general-return-3442-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 00:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB71D57E7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91478 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91420 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91412 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 00:58:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:58:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:58:20 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4B0vSnY021729 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:57:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305075449; bh=aq991iR76xtG5iSvBaKEobVon6oc58/GsGagFUq+PaM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=gebk1mj2ausP6mnVSdT8xwWXaHdq+njbZZd+W2sCj/vIyalr0FDtjtEb103s75Obz l9ZAvmm0BnNwRh52wIPWH3963Hqi771nB0ORvc38E905e2y3TVF6hY/ycMYhqbFrst 61Z714FGBPcVh3pd1Y4KHifI87Jo01c/iZBESFOs= Message-Id: <34132EAF-B19F-4DE1-93F9-5E710888E155@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:57:28 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Awesome. I'm sorry to miss this (I'm neck deep in MR-279), but a heads up on forward porting from my end: # Luke and Suresh are sick of me bugging them and just rolled up their sleeves to finish up all of the metrics2 work! Thanks guys! I've reviewed/committed Luke's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 and Suresh finished up the rest. # I'll work with Devaraj/Chris to finish up the TT security hole (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178 ). thanks, Arun On May 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from > organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, > StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, > Michael > Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been > waiting to get > involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! > > We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo > Alto and > want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a >> great job >> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also >> done a >> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two >> things: >> >> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >> >> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and >> Facebook >> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down >> the 13 >> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward- >> port the >> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >> >> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our >> Palo >> Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the >> following >> Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in >> short order. >> PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and >> PMC members >> Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >> >> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to >> your name, >> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. >> Forward >> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and >> you'll >> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >> submission process. >> >> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >> >> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the >> Cloudera SF >> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you >> can't >> make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >> >> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >> >> Regards, >> Jeff >> >> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and >> I'll see >> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >> >> >> From general-return-3443-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 02:13:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58AAD4073 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44244 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44186 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44178 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 02:13:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:13:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:13:18 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4B2Cm0r042588 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305079968; bh=pmW1A4cyTS0fSBfuKadRnbcsaQUnf/otF++IhXpyktM=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=MOxI2TWRHzED2KUKFn5xRBhAVZEaQFjpBmpaw4pZ2r/1yD62zpL4u+MjaOQR9040N UaC9BuDzhYkNumG9Vn1yfhFG8gt2sJzfZBcScWyPPHki6I+j/kyxfXnE4ZgU3TWgcO QBJigs7u8DaRPep4jpGUsb2pnsfXG6DbJgoyqeLM= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:12:48 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:12:45 -0700 Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? Thread-Topic: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? Thread-Index: AcwPbZ4i/fjDzk0jT9OoS4Uo2ZRcrwAE0xLY Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9EF3EAD355B8ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9EF3EAD355B8ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'll be there .. Looking forward to meeting up with Ian and the other Hadoo= p'ers... On 5/10/11 4:53 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman We are not afraid of the truth, in fact we plan on taking the truth out for= a nice meal while we persuade it to adopt our views --_000_C9EF3EAD355B8ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3444-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 02:50:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E587644EE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72061 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:50:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72014 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72006 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 02:50:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:50:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:49:59 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so127700bwz.35 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.81 with SMTP id o17mr5836313bko.94.1305082178142; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:49:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.13 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:49:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:49:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: "newbie" label on JIRA To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd794a1832104a2f71fc4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cd794a1832104a2f71fc4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I spent this afternoon looking through JIRA to identify some issues that I think would be good for new contributors to try their hand at. In my mind, the qualities of such an issue are: - fairly straightforward issue to solve (an experienced contributor would be able to address it in 30-60 minutes) - fairly tight scope (doesn't require understanding of a lot of different moving pieces) - easy to write a unit test for (so we get new contributors on the right path of testing their changes) - not likely to be controversial among contributors I came up with about 25 of these from looking through the 0.22 and 0.23 "Affects Version" lists: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+in+(%22HADOOP%22,+%22MAPREDUCE%22,+%22HDFS%22)+and+labels+%3D+%22newbie%22 I'd like to encourage others to look through any JIRAs that they think fit the bill, and add the same label. Then, we can point new contributors at this list of JIRAs -- hopefully this will get them on the right path towards understanding our project's workflow and give some nice positive reinforcement since they should be easy to review and commit quickly. Thanks! -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0015175cd794a1832104a2f71fc4-- From general-return-3445-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:35:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19E774DF6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96577 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95760 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:35:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95746 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:35:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:35:19 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so157138bwz.35 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.74.68 with SMTP id t4mr5322497bkj.22.1305084897190; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:34:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.81.136 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:34:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <34132EAF-B19F-4DE1-93F9-5E710888E155@yahoo-inc.com> References: <34132EAF-B19F-4DE1-93F9-5E710888E155@yahoo-inc.com> From: Tom White Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:34:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Awesome. > > I'm sorry to miss this (I'm neck deep in MR-279), but a heads up on forward > porting from my end: > # Luke and Suresh are sick of me bugging them and just rolled up their > sleeves to finish up all of the metrics2 work! Thanks guys! I've > reviewed/committed Luke's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > and Suresh finished up the rest. > # I'll work with Devaraj/Chris to finish up the TT security hole > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178). Thanks Arun - that's great! Tom > > thanks, > Arun > > On May 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from >> organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, >> StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, Michael >> Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been waiting to >> get >> involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! >> >> We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo Alto >> and >> want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at >> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >> >> Regards, >> Jeff >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great >>> job >>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a >>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two >>> things: >>> >>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>> >>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook >>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 >>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port >>> the >>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>> >>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo >>> Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following >>> Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short >>> order. >>> PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC >>> members >>> Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>> >>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your >>> name, >>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward >>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and >>> you'll >>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>> submission process. >>> >>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>> >>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF >>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't >>> make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>> >>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>> >>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll >>> see >>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>> >>> >>> > > From general-return-3446-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 04:51:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22B554F36 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32953 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:51:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32755 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32747 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 04:51:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:51:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:51:46 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4B4p17F024356 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:51:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305089462; bh=TdOH/d0WsrIzVstpywo7hizW0Zvc20n9lyW4x3fzwqE=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=Vet2OBG2bYnsogGC28Bm22RyFZW8GrzVUjrpJOX2YWHFhkP0C3sOHDbU1pBGmhCnv j5kLDgV0D6X/TYO9CfntnXzVQf+cYEUUPqMqcA3tZmMWkEEf+EkDB3DN1f7ntrW+LX 21eX2scy4cvxiZF3sAKFroNIYVoPO1sFNbnNFqvU= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:51:01 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:50:58 -0700 Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Topic: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Index: AcwPjIxsJoki/2MDQ0iivHxen22nTAACnhCi Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9EF63C2355DBddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C9EF63C2355DBddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will get to MR-2178 soon. I & Chris had done a draft of the port to trunk= a few months ago. Hopefully, it is easy to continue from there and merge .= .. On 5/10/11 8:34 PM, "Tom White" wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Awesome. > > I'm sorry to miss this (I'm neck deep in MR-279), but a heads up on forwa= rd > porting from my end: > # Luke and Suresh are sick of me bugging them and just rolled up their > sleeves to finish up all of the metrics2 work! Thanks guys! I've > reviewed/committed Luke's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-69= 19 > and Suresh finished up the rest. > # I'll work with Devaraj/Chris to finish up the TT security hole > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178). Thanks Arun - that's great! Tom > > thanks, > Arun > > On May 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from >> organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, >> StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, Michae= l >> Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been waiting to >> get >> involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! >> >> We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo Alto >> and >> want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at >> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >> >> Regards, >> Jeff >> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great >>> job >>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done = a >>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two >>> things: >>> >>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>> >>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebo= ok >>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 1= 3 >>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port >>> the >>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>> >>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo >>> Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following >>> Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short >>> order. >>> PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC >>> members >>> Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>> >>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your >>> name, >>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forwa= rd >>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and >>> you'll >>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>> submission process. >>> >>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>> >>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera = SF >>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't >>> make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>> >>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>> >>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll >>> see >>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>> >>> >>> > > --_000_C9EF63C2355DBddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3447-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:01:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7620485E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39455 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39073 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:01:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39065 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:01:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:01:23 +0000 Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so138229pxi.2 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.57.235 with SMTP id l11mr3516514pbq.478.1305090062114; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:01:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:00:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:00:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "newbie" label on JIRA To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Todd - this is a great idea and nice list of JIRAs to take care about! I assume you are leaving 0.22 blockers to more experienced contributors, ri= ght? -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:49, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > I spent this afternoon looking through JIRA to identify some issues that = I > think would be good for new contributors to try their hand at. In my mind= , > the qualities of such an issue are: > > - fairly straightforward issue to solve (an experienced contributor would= be > able to address it in 30-60 minutes) > - fairly tight scope (doesn't require understanding of a lot of different > moving pieces) > - easy to write a unit test for (so we get new contributors on the right > path of testing their changes) > - not likely to be controversial among contributors > > I came up with about 25 of these from looking through the 0.22 and 0.23 > "Affects Version" lists: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dtrue&jq= lQuery=3Dproject+in+(%22HADOOP%22,+%22MAPREDUCE%22,+%22HDFS%22)+and+labels+= %3D+%22newbie%22 > > I'd like to encourage others to look through any JIRAs that they think fi= t > the bill, and add the same label. Then, we can point new contributors at > this list of JIRAs -- hopefully this will get them on the right path towa= rds > understanding our project's workflow and give some nice positive > reinforcement since they should be easy to review and commit quickly. > > Thanks! > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3448-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:25:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E7934EA0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57712 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:25:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57662 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57653 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:25:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:25:09 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4B5OZn9058549 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305091475; bh=4w7/vTUhP/xpNWoRGCfdxzlNidPrXE6sdDBYWSzW900=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=eA9hlEpprrIG+1QrHQ4HGG3pgpDxmmpcHT0zoYBIvoiHxqp0zmuYvxCKrue9xhJqk 9jujvH4enlqDQOOHaUrGS/uYOPLECgLlu0rI679iWF6iyvoYJYRAUGk+mvbMrnpUTA cKeWkUg6qXuHw7qGoJwA8282GSNByxjZVH4hp+Qs= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:24:35 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:24:34 -0700 Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Topic: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Thread-Index: AcwPWVVkXE4+QjyeTd+eW37NfwN21wAQmDv1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9EF6BA2355E9ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9EF6BA2355E9ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just so that everyone is on the same page w.r.t the compatibility between 2= 0.2 & 20.203 (don't think this is documented anywhere yet).. The aim of the team working on Hadoop Security at Yahoo! was to make Hadoop= *secure*, and with *minimal* disruption to existing apps. I can't think of= any major user-facing incompatibilities other than the users having to run= a 'kinit' when they are working with a secure Hadoop cluster (of course th= e admins need to do more work in order to set up a secure cluster). Also, s= ecurity can switched off, and all the other enhancements (job limits, etc.)= are still available.. As per users/Operations/Solutions at Yahoo!, 20.secu= rity was one of the smoothest upgrades ever. On 5/10/11 2:28 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Scott Carey wrot= e: > > As an observer, this is a very important observation. Sure, the default > is that dot releases are bugfix-onl. But exceptions to these rules are > sometimes required and often beneficial to the health of the project. > Performance enhancements, minor features, and other items are sometimes > very low risk and the barrier to getting them to users earlier should be > lower. > I agree whole-heartedly. > These issues are the sort of things that get into non-Apache releases > quickly and drive the community away from the Apache release. Its been > well proven through those vehicles that back-porting minor features and > improvements from trunk to an old release can be done safely. However, one shouldn't understate the difficulty of agreeing on the risk-reward tradeoff here. While risk is mostly technical, reward may vary widely based on the userbase or organization. For example, everyone would agree that security was a very risky feature to add to 20, with known backward compatibilities and a lot of fallout. For some people (both CDH and YDH), the security features were an absolute necessity on a tight timeline, so the risk-reward decision was clear -- I'v= e heard from many users, though, that they saw none of the reward from security and wished they hadn't had to endure the resulting changes and bug= s within the 0.20 series. Another example is the 0.20-append patch series, which is indispensable for the HBase community but seen as overly risky by those who do not use HBase. So, while I'm in favor of "sustaining" release series like 0.20-security in theory, I also think we need a clear inclusion criteria for such branches. As I said in a previous email, the criteria used to be "low risk compatible bug fixes only" with a vote process for any exceptions. 0.20-security is obviously entirely different, but as yet remains undefined (it's way more than just "security"). -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --_000_C9EF6BA2355E9ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3449-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:50:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4368C4D5B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77097 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76951 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76938 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:50:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:50:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:50:06 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so2638286qyk.14 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.27.67 with SMTP id h3mr7723782qac.39.1305092985193; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:49:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.71 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:49:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:49:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51ba3d1c8051604a2f9a39c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51ba3d1c8051604a2f9a39c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > I can't think of any major user-facing incompatibilities other than the > users having to run a 'kinit' when they are working with a secure Hadoop > cluster (of course the admins need to do more work in order to set up a > secure cluster). By far the most significant incompatibility that I've seen from a user perspective is that setting hadoop.job.ugi no longer has any effect. Granted, this interface wasn't used by a large percentage of users, but those that were using it have no other alternative that is as flexible as this was. There was discussion about this incompatibility last September on the mailing lists[1]. The conclusion there was that supporting backward compatibility for this interface was too difficult, semantically and technically, to warrant support. This incompatibility is present whether or not Kerberos support is enabled on the cluster. I totally agree that the pain of upgrading to 0.20 security was felt substantially more by admins/operators than by users. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201009.mbox/%3CAANLkTiknJ_SzRux7KhjhxVfUU9FBkNgvYnkpbz3G_+a4@mail.gmail.com%3E --bcaec51ba3d1c8051604a2f9a39c-- From general-return-3450-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:55:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 469324E6B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81285 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:55:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81231 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81218 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:55:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:55:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:55:09 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so238653bwz.35 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.47.77 with SMTP id m13mr1458988bkf.67.1305093288195; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:54:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.13 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:54:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:54:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "newbie" label on JIRA To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd9634d7758d04a2f9b538 --0016e6dd9634d7758d04a2f9b538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Todd - this is a great idea and nice list of JIRAs to take care about! > I assume you are leaving 0.22 blockers to more experienced contributors, > right? > Unfortunately most of the remaining 0.22 blockers are fairly complicated, so better suited to more experienced folks. Of course if any new contributor has a patch ready, that would be great! Also, to be extra clear, the existence of a "newbie" tag on a JIRA shouldn't preclude an experienced contributor from doing an issue themselves. It's just to provide a nice list of starting points for those wanting to get involved, since the total number of open JIRAs (and the complexity of a lot of them) is pretty intimidating. -Todd On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:49, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I spent this afternoon looking through JIRA to identify some issues that > I > > think would be good for new contributors to try their hand at. In my > mind, > > the qualities of such an issue are: > > > > - fairly straightforward issue to solve (an experienced contributor would > be > > able to address it in 30-60 minutes) > > - fairly tight scope (doesn't require understanding of a lot of different > > moving pieces) > > - easy to write a unit test for (so we get new contributors on the right > > path of testing their changes) > > - not likely to be controversial among contributors > > > > I came up with about 25 of these from looking through the 0.22 and 0.23 > > "Affects Version" lists: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+in+(%22HADOOP%22,+%22MAPREDUCE%22,+%22HDFS%22)+and+labels+%3D+%22newbie%22 > > > > I'd like to encourage others to look through any JIRAs that they think > fit > > the bill, and add the same label. Then, we can point new contributors at > > this list of JIRAs -- hopefully this will get them on the right path > towards > > understanding our project's workflow and give some nice positive > > reinforcement since they should be easy to review and commit quickly. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Todd > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6dd9634d7758d04a2f9b538-- From general-return-3451-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 07:00:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D8FC4562 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49660 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 07:00:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49612 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 07:00:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49604 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 07:00:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:00:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:00:46 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so279858bwz.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.20.74 with SMTP id e10mr625579bkb.148.1305097226287; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.13 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555903e920d9604a2faa044 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555903e920d9604a2faa044 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > Just so that everyone is on the same page w.r.t the compatibility between > 20.2 & 20.203 (don't think this is documented anywhere yet).. > > The aim of the team working on Hadoop Security at Yahoo! was to make Hadoop > *secure*, and with *minimal* disruption to existing apps. I can't think of > any major user-facing incompatibilities other than the users having to run a > 'kinit' when they are working with a secure Hadoop cluster (of course the > admins need to do more work in order to set up a secure cluster). Also, > security can switched off, and all the other enhancements (job limits, etc.) > are still available.. As per users/Operations/Solutions at Yahoo!, > 20.security was one of the smoothest upgrades ever. > And I think you guys did a commendable job with this, given the scope of the project! :) But there were certainly plenty of bugs introduced along the way that affected both secure and non-secure, and even now the security-able branches don't function on any non-Sun JVM. Again, I think for this particular case, most of the developers agreed on the risk/reward trade-off, so I didn't want to start a discussion about security being a good or bad decision to backport on to 0.20. But, I'd love to know what our framework is for making such decisions in the future, if we plan to maintain branches with feature backports as part of Apache. (eg what scope of change requires what type of vote and when) -Todd > > On 5/10/11 2:28 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Scott Carey >wrote: > > > > > As an observer, this is a very important observation. Sure, the default > > is that dot releases are bugfix-onl. But exceptions to these rules are > > sometimes required and often beneficial to the health of the project. > > Performance enhancements, minor features, and other items are sometimes > > very low risk and the barrier to getting them to users earlier should be > > lower. > > > > I agree whole-heartedly. > > > > These issues are the sort of things that get into non-Apache releases > > quickly and drive the community away from the Apache release. Its been > > well proven through those vehicles that back-porting minor features and > > improvements from trunk to an old release can be done safely. > > > However, one shouldn't understate the difficulty of agreeing on the > risk-reward tradeoff here. While risk is mostly technical, reward may vary > widely based on the userbase or organization. > > For example, everyone would agree that security was a very risky feature to > add to 20, with known backward compatibilities and a lot of fallout. For > some people (both CDH and YDH), the security features were an absolute > necessity on a tight timeline, so the risk-reward decision was clear -- > I've > heard from many users, though, that they saw none of the reward from > security and wished they hadn't had to endure the resulting changes and > bugs > within the 0.20 series. > > Another example is the 0.20-append patch series, which is indispensable for > the HBase community but seen as overly risky by those who do not use HBase. > > So, while I'm in favor of "sustaining" release series like 0.20-security in > theory, I also think we need a clear inclusion criteria for such branches. > As I said in a previous email, the criteria used to be "low risk compatible > bug fixes only" with a vote process for any exceptions. 0.20-security is > obviously entirely different, but as yet remains undefined (it's way more > than just "security"). > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00032555903e920d9604a2faa044-- From general-return-3452-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 07:43:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E75C24CB4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6574 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 07:43:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5819 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 07:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5811 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 07:43:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:43:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.201] (HELO nm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 07:43:35 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.194] by nm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 07:43:13 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.158] by tm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 07:43:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1041.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 May 2011 07:43:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 821865.64793.bm@omp1041.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66137 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2011 07:43:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1305099793; bh=PN2TrU/KCvEvJ7+++jDtoftd9Kq4u4VSzgHQJaMP8Q8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t5m4yR9/AergglYr+TIS4o6onwWYxrcW5qv68dKovz2QWaFRCc3WExRjlxxqOBdgr5skb9HPfb+kS84wvq9vSOKv/qPPipemHzgRBpHLgTQke+u2tIyiCVsmjPEXZUgbBnsfVwTdygFIjuOWrTBnJjhb0Wf4S3LHw/91Qe7p66Y= Message-ID: <655300.15287.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: BMFj6jcVM1n7HMe1Z70aQ4u._y4GR1Nm2goKPtowzbEgxmU N6ML6EMk4xks63W.YqdhdAnQZfNTuQivzGQRl8Og_VxqQZ9bNhV1uya4WFZR kvA.sEUGvYnRzsi3EVgwQkLcqSHZFXNnhpyW0Qos0wE5lYrjzpSykg6mN.Bq pUOd3cHPxKhhEmXpz4u1eRuZVWArtFd87J.Z_RPhrQqP4ngVmJHvJxo_tvfg G_FWVNDgCfA9GAsLkEaxe4pkbDLEZLbge1KpIsC1dZwzEl41f0W7x1Mp0qkl wujOaq9Qfq.O4UAvrZB58PKKF7.jitHK2SLDbOT9utt50pOAmRrVFifiF1sr Y5k5vkx8oOqONIvhKXuIBuPIK9hs3vWE34HZ05KzuQHERhy9qfIj4i15BxHJ 8Iz0ZZm0LtTFraHizfzonTN.6WUgBnamfAb50dQjW5XJPEaC9LT79Jjh.5Dr WuQv1FYvO11mhuUaIMKKhOeykrUallloIhc2H Received: from [60.251.45.163] by web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:43:13 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.110.299900 Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:43:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Steve Loughran =0A> Subject: Defining Hadoop Com= patibility -revisiting-=0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Tuesday= , May 10, 2011, 3:29 AM=0A> =0A> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion a= bout how to=0A> define Apache Hadoop Compatibility:=0A> http://mail-archive= s.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D46B6AD.2020802@apache= .org%3E=0A> =0A> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop= =0A> datasheet=0A[...]=0A> -I don't think you can claim to have a=0A> Dist= ribution/Fork/Version of Apache Hadoop if you swap out=0A> big chunks of it= for alternate filesystems, MR engines, etc.=0A> Some description of this i= s needed=0A> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of=0A> Fil= esystem XYZ"=0A=0AThis is also the case with Brisk, which replaces HDFS and= the standard JobTracker with Cassandra and a new JobTracker, and claims to= be a Hadoop distribution.=0A=0A "Apache Hadoop TM Powered by Cassandra"= =0A http://www.datastax.com/products/brisk=0A=0A "DataStax=E2=80=99 Brisk= is an enhanced open-source Apache Hadoop and=0A Hive distribution that ut= ilizes Apache Cassandra for many of=0A its core services. [...]"=0A=0A - = Andy=0A From general-return-3453-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 09:09:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B2014C41 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19955 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:09:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19747 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:09:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19739 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 09:09:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:09:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:09:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834E91BA934 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:08:48 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tcwvCzru7ZY4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:08:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98DF1BA8FC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:08:47 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305709715.53521@KaifiW7uEKCUFpC99a6iZg Received: from [16.24.227.187] ([16.24.227.187]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4B98YsV028091 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:08:34 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:08:29 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4B98YsV028091 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: > If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. > > http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ > 1. I'm going to be there, talking about Hadoop testing: Junit -> MrUnit, -> minimr -> single host, sampling, how to ramp to production scale 2. Isabel would like us to have a Hadoop Hackathon, which could be @Nokia (big Hadoop users) on the thursday. I could come to this, but will be flying home early afternoon, and am too busy with my talk and unrelated work deadlines to organise a hackathon. I do think it would be good to have a hadoop hackathon of a sort there, and if someone wants to take up the challenge of organising a more detailed hadoop hackathon, maybe with some discussion of the MR 2.0 engine, etc. Who else from the -user and -dev lists will be there and is willing to help put this together? -steve From general-return-3454-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 09:26:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA0864641 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52751 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:26:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52694 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:26:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52684 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 09:26:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:26:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:25:48 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:25:27 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:25:27 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" , "cdh-user@cloudera.org" , "'hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:23:25 +0200 Subject: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwPvRRk2s4vP8/iRMSVf8vjhmk8oA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A474E7Aplanckkasaran_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A474E7Aplanckkasaran_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi list, I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy load we= lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in IOExceptio= ns, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. Can anybody g= ive me advise or best practices on a different configuration to increase th= e stability? Below I've included the specs of the cluster, the hadoop relat= ed config and an example of when which things go wrong. Any help is very mu= ch appreciated, and if I can provide any other info please let me know. Cheers, Evert =3D=3D What goes wrong, and when =3D=3D See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load of a si= ngle job. This job: * reads ~1TB from HDFS * writes ~200GB to HDFS * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The system s= tarts swapping and there is a short time interval during which most cores a= re in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At around half way, o= ne or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked as dead nodes. The am= ount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then some "java.io.IOExceptio= n: Could not obtain block" are thrown in Mappers. The job does manage to fi= nish successfully after around 3.5 hours, but my fear is that when we make = the input much larger - which we want - the system becomes too unstable to = finish the job. Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We notice= that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text to LongWr= itable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. However, this= for some reason results in much more network traffic and makes Reducers ex= tremely slow. We're working on figuring out what causes this. =3D=3D The cluster =3D=3D We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop 0.20.2 on = CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run DN's and TT's. E= ach node has: * 16GB RAM * 32GB swapspace * 4 cores * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we had ava= ilable for a prototype environment. We're working on putting together a spe= cification for a much larger production environment. =3D=3D Hadoop config =3D=3D Here some properties that I think might be relevant: __CORE-SITE.XML__ fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 __HDFS-SITE.XML__ # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's dfs.block.size: 134217728 # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine mapred.compress.map.output: true mapred.map.output.compression.codec: com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A474E7Aplanckkasaran_-- From general-return-3455-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 10:31:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABDE94174 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33120 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:31:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33066 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:31:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33058 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 10:31:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:31:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:31:33 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so434101bwz.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SqOlqkbXSG5TOhvjXrv54ErLoFyD/MifSr77Pp6t8QA=; b=o8OmCFJa/8SOK0rLyoTNAbRR+NMNTVyFNrOSZSK0GRV2PkrRB+uUGJ0W4r6SUkLMv8 aY7+cGakXYUQVNF3YXKTl0DWxu6UsGn+i/qmBm8TjPLB3hV+8vT67qthznpbdJsvgb6e XbyUGxKimCbZndwZiotUhamO9qC4a2J6iT2kc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SSyhMcz1qFwTQHM0ueAix8aqjPURodjk76DYYf0wYVxwbh0yDzpiAdewKQ1lXXU1nO QeV+d0FGFMeC/zVTxMHVHcp1pT7yJYxZg78YTqflrXwfRJi+io8FI+vErQPRCRPLsfbM FKy8T00FDXfkNjbAdhCJ9vqhNR6dIomPoiAJ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.41.2 with SMTP id m2mr1893391bke.54.1305109872047; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.83.196 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:31:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:08, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: >> >> If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. >> >> http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ >> > > 1. I'm going to be there 1.1. me too, but only for the conference on Mon + Tue. Who's available for a Hadoop/Apache/etc food + beverages on Monday evening? Bernd From general-return-3456-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 10:34:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0B845000 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40118 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:34:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40049 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:34:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40041 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 10:34:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:34:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:34:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F061BA943 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:34:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GFAXuCV5C87F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:34:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7901BA93D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:34:24 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305714852.21315@i003BrJHnYdHngHBHDsvwQ Received: from [16.24.227.187] ([16.24.227.187]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4BAYBTp000281 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:34:11 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCA661E.3020801@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:34:06 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <655300.15287.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <655300.15287.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4BAYBTp000281 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 11/05/2011 08:43, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> From: Steve Loughran >> -I don't think you can claim to have a >> Distribution/Fork/Version of Apache Hadoop if you swap out >> big chunks of it for alternate filesystems, MR engines, etc. >> Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of >> Filesystem XYZ" > > This is also the case with Brisk, which replaces HDFS and the standard JobTracker with Cassandra and a new JobTracker, and claims to be a Hadoop distribution. > > "Apache Hadoop TM Powered by Cassandra" > http://www.datastax.com/products/brisk > > "DataStax’ Brisk is an enhanced open-source Apache Hadoop and > Hive distribution that utilizes Apache Cassandra for many of > its core services. [...]" > +1. It is something containing Hadoop interfaces and possibly source/artifacts, but I'm not sure how to describe it. It is just something that claims compatibility with Hadoop's filesystem and MR runtime. If Google chose to add the same interfaces to their platform within Google App Engine, it wouldn't be a Hadoop distro either. I think it's important to set some definitions here *now* so that confusion doesn't set in. From general-return-3457-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 10:49:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CB814806 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54924 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:49:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54708 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 10:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54700 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 10:49:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:49:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:49:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90886B7E49 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:49:16 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i+eqPTHPp-KE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:49:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396A2B7E42 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:49:14 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305715743.12954@sOwZtvfyjTFAKc2HInRYCQ Received: from [16.24.227.187] ([16.24.227.187]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4BAn0Wn000684 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:49:00 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCA6997.2040200@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:48:55 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4BAn0Wn000684 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 11/05/2011 03:12, Devaraj Das wrote: > I'll be there .. Looking forward to meeting up with Ian and the other Hadoop'ers... > OK, there's now a tentative plan for a Hadoop hackathon, i'd like a volunteer to do a tour of the MR-279 codebase, and we have a volunteer to talk about gridmix. http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/hadoop-hackathon Being a hackathon and all, some coding theme would be good. Testing MR-279? From general-return-3458-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 12:57:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23C7A45B1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35085 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 12:57:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35045 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 12:57:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35037 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 12:57:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:57:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:57:42 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so290309qwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:57:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.27.20 with SMTP id g20mr7571578qac.15.1305118641140; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.67.136 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:57:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 06:57:21 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's From: Eric Fiala To: cdh-user@cloudera.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a8524feb30204a2ff9ca2 --bcaec51a8524feb30204a2ff9ca2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Evert, >From my experience, hadoop loathes swap and you mention that all reduces and mappers are running (8 total) and from the ganglia screenshot I see that you have a thick crest of that purple swap. If we do the math that means [ map.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts ] + [ reduce.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts ] => or [ 4 * 2.5G ] + [ 4 * 2.5G ] is greater than the amount of physical RAM in the machine. This doesn't account for the base tasktracker and datanode process + OS overhead and whatever else may be hoarding resources on the systems. I would play with this ratio, either less maps / reduces max - or lower your child.java.opts so that when you are fully subscribed you are not using more resource than the machine can offer. Also, setting mapred.reduce.slowstart.completed.maps to 1.00 or some other value close to 1 would be one way to guarantee only 4 either maps or reduces to be running at once and address (albeit in a duct tape like way) the oversubscription problem you are seeing (this represents the fractions of maps that should complete before initiating the reduce phase). hth EF On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi list, > > I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy load we > lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in > IOExceptions, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. Can > anybody give me advise or best practices on a different configuration to > increase the stability? Below I've included the specs of the cluster, the > hadoop related config and an example of when which things go wrong. Any help > is very much appreciated, and if I can provide any other info please let me > know. > > Cheers, > Evert > > == What goes wrong, and when == > > See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load of a > single job. This job: > * reads ~1TB from HDFS > * writes ~200GB to HDFS > * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers > > When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The system > starts swapping and there is a short time interval during which most cores > are in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At around half way, > one or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked as dead nodes. The > amount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then some > "java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block" are thrown in Mappers. The job > does manage to finish successfully after around 3.5 hours, but my fear is > that when we make the input much larger - which we want - the system becomes > too unstable to finish the job. > > Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We notice > that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text to > LongWritable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. However, > this for some reason results in much more network traffic and makes Reducers > extremely slow. We're working on figuring out what causes this. > > > == The cluster == > > We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop 0.20.2 on > CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run DN's and TT's. > Each node has: > * 16GB RAM > * 32GB swapspace > * 4 cores > * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS > * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access > > I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we had > available for a prototype environment. We're working on putting together a > specification for a much larger production environment. > > > == Hadoop config == > > Here some properties that I think might be relevant: > > __CORE-SITE.XML__ > > fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 > mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 > mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 > # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's > io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 > > __HDFS-SITE.XML__ > > # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's > dfs.block.size: 134217728 > # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt > dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 > # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s > dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 > > __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ > > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 > mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m > mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 > mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m > mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m > # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine > mapred.compress.map.output: true > mapred.map.output.compression.codec: com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec > > --bcaec51a8524feb30204a2ff9ca2-- From general-return-3459-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 13:21:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88C0C4629 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76508 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76425 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76417 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 13:21:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.160.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of james@tynt.com) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:43 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so326500pwi.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.2.129 with SMTP id 1mr2076029pbu.145.1305118449411; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.13] (S01060016cbc5f8b4.cg.shawcable.net [174.0.46.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm5507255pbq.6.2011.05.11.05.54.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 05:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's From: James Seigel In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 06:54:06 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <763952E3-8AAD-4757-99DC-57ABC06BBC2C@tynt.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Evert, What=92s the stack trace and what version of hadoop do you have = installed Sir! James. On 2011-05-11, at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy = load we lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in = IOExceptions, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. = Can anybody give me advise or best practices on a different = configuration to increase the stability? Below I've included the specs = of the cluster, the hadoop related config and an example of when which = things go wrong. Any help is very much appreciated, and if I can provide = any other info please let me know. >=20 > Cheers, > Evert >=20 > =3D=3D What goes wrong, and when =3D=3D >=20 > See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load of = a single job. This job: > * reads ~1TB from HDFS > * writes ~200GB to HDFS > * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers >=20 > When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The = system starts swapping and there is a short time interval during which = most cores are in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At = around half way, one or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked = as dead nodes. The amount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then = some "java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block" are thrown in = Mappers. The job does manage to finish successfully after around 3.5 = hours, but my fear is that when we make the input much larger - which we = want - the system becomes too unstable to finish the job. >=20 > Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We = notice that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text = to LongWritable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. = However, this for some reason results in much more network traffic and = makes Reducers extremely slow. We're working on figuring out what causes = this. >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D The cluster =3D=3D >=20 > We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop = 0.20.2 on CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run = DN's and TT's. Each node has: > * 16GB RAM > * 32GB swapspace > * 4 cores > * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS > * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >=20 > I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we = had available for a prototype environment. We're working on putting = together a specification for a much larger production environment. >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D Hadoop config =3D=3D >=20 > Here some properties that I think might be relevant: >=20 > __CORE-SITE.XML__ >=20 > fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 > mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 > mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 > # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's > io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 >=20 > __HDFS-SITE.XML__ >=20 > # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's > dfs.block.size: 134217728 > # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt > dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 > # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s > dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 >=20 > __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ >=20 > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 > mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m > mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 > mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m > mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m > # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine > mapred.compress.map.output: true > mapred.map.output.compression.codec: = com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec >=20 From general-return-3460-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 13:39:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F15F4EB3 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19890 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:39:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19826 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:39:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19811 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 13:39:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:39:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:38:56 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:38:34 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:38:13 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:11 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwP3m0sYkuQIkI6Sfiu1Yslgv3bpAAAXW6g Message-ID: References: <763952E3-8AAD-4757-99DC-57ABC06BBC2C@tynt.com> In-Reply-To: <763952E3-8AAD-4757-99DC-57ABC06BBC2C@tynt.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi James, Hadoop version is 0.20.2 (find that and more on our setup also in my first = mail, under heading "The cluster"). Below I) an example stacktrace of losing a datanode is and II) an example o= f a "Could not obtain block" IOException. Cheers, Evert 11/05/11 15:06:43 INFO hdfs.DFSClient: Failed to connect to /192.168.28.214= :50050, add to deadNodes and continue java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60000 millis timeout while waiting for cha= nnel to be ready for read. ch : java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=3D/192.168.28.209:50726 rem= ote=3D/192.168.28.214:50050] at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeo= ut.java:164) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.j= ava:155) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.j= ava:128) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:237) at java.io.DataInputStream.readShort(DataInputStream.java:295) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$BlockReader.newBlockReader(DFSC= lient.java:1478) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSC= lient.java:1811) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.j= ava:1948) at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:178) at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer$Buffer.write(DataOutputBuf= fer.java:63) at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.jav= a:101) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:= 1945) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:= 1845) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:= 1891) at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileItera= tor.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:95) at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileItera= tor.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:1) at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.tryToComputeNext(Abst= ractIterator.java:135) at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.hasNext(AbstractItera= tor.java:130) at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.RandomSeedGenerator.buildRando= m(RandomSeedGenerator.java:85) at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.run(Job.java:171) at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.main(Job.java:74) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessor= Impl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethod= AccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:186) 11/05/10 09:43:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 82% reduce 17% 11/05/10 09:44= :39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201104121440_0122_m_000225_0, Status : FAILED java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: blk_4397122445076815438_4097927 file=3D/user/joaquin/data/20081201/20081201.039 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(D= FSClient.java:1993) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSC= lient.java:1800) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.j= ava:1948) at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyVa= lue(LineRecordReader.java:97) at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.KeyValueLineRecordReader.nextK= eyValue(KeyValueLineRecordReader.java:94) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKey= Value(MapTask.java:455) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.j= ava:67) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:646) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:322) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:268) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupIn= formation.java:1115) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:262) > -----Original Message----- > From: James Seigel [mailto:james@tynt.com] > Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 14:54 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's > > Evert, > > What's the stack trace and what version of hadoop do you have installed > Sir! > > James. > On 2011-05-11, at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy > load we lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in > IOExceptions, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. > Can anybody give me advise or best practices on a different > configuration to increase the stability? Below I've included the specs > of the cluster, the hadoop related config and an example of when which > things go wrong. Any help is very much appreciated, and if I can > provide any other info please let me know. > > > > Cheers, > > Evert > > > > =3D=3D What goes wrong, and when =3D=3D > > > > See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load > of a single job. This job: > > * reads ~1TB from HDFS > > * writes ~200GB to HDFS > > * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers > > > > When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The > system starts swapping and there is a short time interval during which > most cores are in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At > around half way, one or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked > as dead nodes. The amount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then > some "java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block" are thrown in > Mappers. The job does manage to finish successfully after around 3.5 > hours, but my fear is that when we make the input much larger - which > we want - the system becomes too unstable to finish the job. > > > > Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We > notice that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text > to LongWritable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. > However, this for some reason results in much more network traffic and > makes Reducers extremely slow. We're working on figuring out what > causes this. > > > > > > =3D=3D The cluster =3D=3D > > > > We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop > 0.20.2 on CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run > DN's and TT's. Each node has: > > * 16GB RAM > > * 32GB swapspace > > * 4 cores > > * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS > > * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks > > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects > > * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access > > > > I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we > had available for a prototype environment. We're working on putting > together a specification for a much larger production environment. > > > > > > =3D=3D Hadoop config =3D=3D > > > > Here some properties that I think might be relevant: > > > > __CORE-SITE.XML__ > > > > fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 > > mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 > > mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 > > # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's > > io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 > > > > __HDFS-SITE.XML__ > > > > # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's > > dfs.block.size: 134217728 > > # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt > > dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 > > # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s > > dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 > > > > __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ > > > > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 > > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 > > mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m > > mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 > > mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m > > mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m > > # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine > > mapred.compress.map.output: true > > mapred.map.output.compression.codec: > com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec > > From general-return-3461-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 13:41:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B93E4003 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32406 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:41:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32330 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32322 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 13:41:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.83.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of james@tynt.com) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:27 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so212219gwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.12.5 with SMTP id p5mr5653847ani.39.1305121265828; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:41:05 -0700 (PDT) References: <763952E3-8AAD-4757-99DC-57ABC06BBC2C@tynt.com> From: James Seigel In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:41:02 -0600 Message-ID: <8740675753567357118@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I noticed you crossposted to cloudera, what version of theirs are you running? Cheers James Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the typos. On 2011-05-11, at 7:39 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi James, > > Hadoop version is 0.20.2 (find that and more on our setup also in my first mail, under heading "The cluster"). > > Below I) an example stacktrace of losing a datanode is and II) an example of a "Could not obtain block" IOException. > > Cheers, > Evert > > 11/05/11 15:06:43 INFO hdfs.DFSClient: Failed to connect to /192.168.28.214:50050, add to deadNodes and continue > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60000 millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for read. ch : > java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/192.168.28.209:50726 remote=/192.168.28.214:50050] > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:164) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:155) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:128) > at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) > at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:237) > at java.io.DataInputStream.readShort(DataInputStream.java:295) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$BlockReader.newBlockReader(DFSClient.java:1478) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1811) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1948) > at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:178) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer$Buffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:63) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:101) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1945) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1845) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1891) > at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileIterator.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:95) > at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileIterator.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:1) > at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.tryToComputeNext(AbstractIterator.java:135) > at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.hasNext(AbstractIterator.java:130) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.RandomSeedGenerator.buildRandom(RandomSeedGenerator.java:85) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.run(Job.java:171) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.main(Job.java:74) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:186) > > > 11/05/10 09:43:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 82% reduce 17% 11/05/10 09:44:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201104121440_0122_m_000225_0, Status : FAILED > java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: > blk_4397122445076815438_4097927 > file=/user/joaquin/data/20081201/20081201.039 > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient.java:1993) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1800) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1948) > at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(LineRecordReader.java:97) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.KeyValueLineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(KeyValueLineRecordReader.java:94) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKeyValue(MapTask.java:455) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.java:67) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:646) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:322) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:268) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1115) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:262) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Seigel [mailto:james@tynt.com] >> Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 14:54 >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's >> >> Evert, >> >> What's the stack trace and what version of hadoop do you have installed >> Sir! >> >> James. >> On 2011-05-11, at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy >> load we lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in >> IOExceptions, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. >> Can anybody give me advise or best practices on a different >> configuration to increase the stability? Below I've included the specs >> of the cluster, the hadoop related config and an example of when which >> things go wrong. Any help is very much appreciated, and if I can >> provide any other info please let me know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Evert >>> >>> == What goes wrong, and when == >>> >>> See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load >> of a single job. This job: >>> * reads ~1TB from HDFS >>> * writes ~200GB to HDFS >>> * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers >>> >>> When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The >> system starts swapping and there is a short time interval during which >> most cores are in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At >> around half way, one or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked >> as dead nodes. The amount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then >> some "java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block" are thrown in >> Mappers. The job does manage to finish successfully after around 3.5 >> hours, but my fear is that when we make the input much larger - which >> we want - the system becomes too unstable to finish the job. >>> >>> Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We >> notice that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text >> to LongWritable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. >> However, this for some reason results in much more network traffic and >> makes Reducers extremely slow. We're working on figuring out what >> causes this. >>> >>> >>> == The cluster == >>> >>> We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop >> 0.20.2 on CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run >> DN's and TT's. Each node has: >>> * 16GB RAM >>> * 32GB swapspace >>> * 4 cores >>> * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS >>> * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>> >>> I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we >> had available for a prototype environment. We're working on putting >> together a specification for a much larger production environment. >>> >>> >>> == Hadoop config == >>> >>> Here some properties that I think might be relevant: >>> >>> __CORE-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 >>> mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 >>> mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 >>> # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's >>> io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 >>> >>> __HDFS-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's >>> dfs.block.size: 134217728 >>> # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt >>> dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 >>> # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s >>> dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 >>> >>> __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 >>> mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 >>> mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m >>> mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 >>> mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m >>> mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m >>> # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine >>> mapred.compress.map.output: true >>> mapred.map.output.compression.codec: >> com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec >>> > From general-return-3462-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 13:42:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E18E940B9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36060 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:42:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36012 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 13:42:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36004 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 13:42:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:42:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.213.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of james@tynt.com) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:42:38 +0000 Received: by ywk9 with SMTP id 9so213629ywk.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.12.5 with SMTP id p5mr5654709ani.39.1305121337540; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:42:17 -0700 (PDT) References: <763952E3-8AAD-4757-99DC-57ABC06BBC2C@tynt.com> From: James Seigel In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:42:14 -0600 Message-ID: <-142259448883561283@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Have you dug into the dead DN logs as well? James Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the typos. On 2011-05-11, at 7:39 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi James, > > Hadoop version is 0.20.2 (find that and more on our setup also in my first mail, under heading "The cluster"). > > Below I) an example stacktrace of losing a datanode is and II) an example of a "Could not obtain block" IOException. > > Cheers, > Evert > > 11/05/11 15:06:43 INFO hdfs.DFSClient: Failed to connect to /192.168.28.214:50050, add to deadNodes and continue > java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60000 millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for read. ch : > java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/192.168.28.209:50726 remote=/192.168.28.214:50050] > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:164) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:155) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:128) > at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) > at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:237) > at java.io.DataInputStream.readShort(DataInputStream.java:295) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$BlockReader.newBlockReader(DFSClient.java:1478) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1811) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1948) > at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:178) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer$Buffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:63) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:101) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1945) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1845) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1891) > at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileIterator.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:95) > at org.apache.mahout.common.iterator.sequencefile.SequenceFileIterator.computeNext(SequenceFileIterator.java:1) > at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.tryToComputeNext(AbstractIterator.java:135) > at com.google.common.collect.AbstractIterator.hasNext(AbstractIterator.java:130) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.RandomSeedGenerator.buildRandom(RandomSeedGenerator.java:85) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.run(Job.java:171) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.Job.main(Job.java:74) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:186) > > > 11/05/10 09:43:47 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 82% reduce 17% 11/05/10 09:44:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201104121440_0122_m_000225_0, Status : FAILED > java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: > blk_4397122445076815438_4097927 > file=/user/joaquin/data/20081201/20081201.039 > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient.java:1993) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1800) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1948) > at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(LineRecordReader.java:97) > at nl.liacs.infrawatch.hadoop.kmeans.KeyValueLineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(KeyValueLineRecordReader.java:94) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKeyValue(MapTask.java:455) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.java:67) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:646) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:322) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:268) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1115) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:262) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Seigel [mailto:james@tynt.com] >> Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 14:54 >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's >> >> Evert, >> >> What's the stack trace and what version of hadoop do you have installed >> Sir! >> >> James. >> On 2011-05-11, at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy >> load we lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in >> IOExceptions, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. >> Can anybody give me advise or best practices on a different >> configuration to increase the stability? Below I've included the specs >> of the cluster, the hadoop related config and an example of when which >> things go wrong. Any help is very much appreciated, and if I can >> provide any other info please let me know. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Evert >>> >>> == What goes wrong, and when == >>> >>> See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load >> of a single job. This job: >>> * reads ~1TB from HDFS >>> * writes ~200GB to HDFS >>> * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers >>> >>> When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The >> system starts swapping and there is a short time interval during which >> most cores are in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At >> around half way, one or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked >> as dead nodes. The amount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then >> some "java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block" are thrown in >> Mappers. The job does manage to finish successfully after around 3.5 >> hours, but my fear is that when we make the input much larger - which >> we want - the system becomes too unstable to finish the job. >>> >>> Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We >> notice that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text >> to LongWritable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. >> However, this for some reason results in much more network traffic and >> makes Reducers extremely slow. We're working on figuring out what >> causes this. >>> >>> >>> == The cluster == >>> >>> We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop >> 0.20.2 on CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run >> DN's and TT's. Each node has: >>> * 16GB RAM >>> * 32GB swapspace >>> * 4 cores >>> * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS >>> * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>> >>> I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we >> had available for a prototype environment. We're working on putting >> together a specification for a much larger production environment. >>> >>> >>> == Hadoop config == >>> >>> Here some properties that I think might be relevant: >>> >>> __CORE-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 >>> mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 >>> mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 >>> # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's >>> io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 >>> >>> __HDFS-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's >>> dfs.block.size: 134217728 >>> # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt >>> dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 >>> # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s >>> dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 >>> >>> __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ >>> >>> mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 >>> mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 >>> mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m >>> mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 >>> mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m >>> mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m >>> # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine >>> mapred.compress.map.output: true >>> mapred.map.output.compression.codec: >> com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec >>> > From general-return-3463-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:04:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 140804DE4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25944 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:03:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25874 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:03:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25866 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:03:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:03:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:03:53 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4BF2RmW017184 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305126147; bh=mu7cc1tmjZtbVgaM8LH0TBHWVls6U0rU1bxHuEZ7SJI=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=FCS/WCd2vXPSfw+lWPan7b8gP3tMgnoZsLrWNJMH/kiKFKd+4oWouu2JNftS/UdOp Uh0KC4Jra7+guR737ij63wRJ0HrCIEzrfhNEsQsQ3suczFZXKxaWvW8hBBI93lYBbF fLwYPDjZSjiGePGayQsQr58CslZdgu/Vic7hNpJs= Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:02:27 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:02:26 -0700 Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? Thread-Topic: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? Thread-Index: AcwPyTNg/oOFdfAqQ92h/sattuN1dwAIz0SI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DCA6997.2040200@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9EFF31235694ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9EFF31235694ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I can do a tour of the MR-279 codebase but I am currently flying out on the= afternoon of Wednesday. Let me see if I can change the flight bookings. On 5/11/11 3:48 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: On 11/05/2011 03:12, Devaraj Das wrote: > I'll be there .. Looking forward to meeting up with Ian and the other Had= oop'ers... > OK, there's now a tentative plan for a Hadoop hackathon, i'd like a volunteer to do a tour of the MR-279 codebase, and we have a volunteer to talk about gridmix. http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/hadoop-hackathon Being a hackathon and all, some coding theme would be good. Testing MR-279? --_000_C9EFF31235694ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3464-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:45:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E770408B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46093 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45970 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45961 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:45:45 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:45:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO dhcp-02.private.iobm.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:45:45 +0000 Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:45:44 -0700 Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 11, 2011, at 5:57 AM, Eric Fiala wrote: >=20 > If we do the math that means [ map.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts = ] + > [ reduce.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts ] =3D> or [ 4 * 2.5G ] + [ = 4 * > 2.5G ] is greater than the amount of physical RAM in the machine. > This doesn't account for the base tasktracker and datanode process + = OS > overhead and whatever else may be hoarding resources on the systems. +1 to what Eric said. You've exhausted memory and now the whole system is falling = apart. =20 > I would play with this ratio, either less maps / reduces max - or = lower your > child.java.opts so that when you are fully subscribed you are not = using > more resource than the machine can offer. Yup. > Also, setting mapred.reduce.slowstart.completed.maps to 1.00 or some = other > value close to 1 would be one way to guarantee only 4 either maps or = reduces > to be running at once and address (albeit in a duct tape like way) the > oversubscription problem you are seeing (this represents the fractions = of > maps that should complete before initiating the reduce phase). slowstart isn't really going to help you much here. All it = takes is another job with the same settings running at the same time and = processes will start dying again. That said, the default for slowstart = is incredibly stupid for the vast majority. Something closer to .70 or = .80 is more realistic. >> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance = problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. From general-return-3465-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:33:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EE984AEF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15778 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:33:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15729 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10499 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:28:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of im_gumby@hotmail.com designates 65.55.116.13 as permitted sender) X-Originating-IP: [187.146.84.243] X-Originating-Email: [im_gumby@hotmail.com] Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8H7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CC: "" , "" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8H7) From: Michel Segel Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:22:28 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2011 17:28:13.0395 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE4ABA30:01CC1000] Sender: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You really really don't want to do this. Long story short... It won't work.=20 Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They shoul= d interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your cluster has a= single network to worry about. Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >=20 > Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance problems wit= h Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3466-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:36:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37E1540B9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20241 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:36:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20193 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:36:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20185 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:36:32 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:36:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:36:32 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3068823qyk.14 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.6.196 with SMTP id a4mr7384972qca.143.1305135391453; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.131 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:36:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:36:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb12064338c04a30383cd --0015175cb12064338c04a30383cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The vote on 0.20.203.0-rc1 passes. We have our first stable release in a year. The votes were: 13 +1's (10 binding: Arun, Chris, Devaraj, Dhruba, Jakob, Mahadev, Nicholas, Owen, Sanjay, Suresh) 7 -1's (4 binding: Doug, Eli, Konstantin, Todd) Konstantin, your issue with the test cases requiring a umask 02 is a good point. I'll patch it and can roll a 0.20.203.1 release candidate. -- Owen --0015175cb12064338c04a30383cd-- From general-return-3467-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:38:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABF41411D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22832 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22776 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22768 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:38:31 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so501167qwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=h3T3cwsfEIvZCEWzw+phR8ZLWRpyGEmb6z9sldz/OSo=; b=BnTJYJ8v17eDCfwR52gVh+MjFbi8O62SgRdQCwtzbo05y1DzxfZzmLyLI2rFGJg0KR pze+Uwp9TllDJrz8ZCNrnmWgJEvP6jrmJDbTNLBAlGOe55/7UAba+EuK/oIjodxiwq4N PbbD5K0Dkz4bH9FMZ6AyLC3Q1HnXGBt/PpLAM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=IKV0s2tS4s5xGpKi0lWs03E9J1Xof9KJPPdU6e3ZVGqo+C/4VZSUf+JYR03v9cfNZy XKixOv+ztYsPezovG9SUk/gIKODOo1nYRGGvJYNGGCmGYoSMg3OCgMLhSMHy6kPHl1x3 QvPxKnRjNhzE8WPvwHGRhyB+7SntUmzqkDCUs= Received: by 10.229.77.205 with SMTP id h13mr7436461qck.287.1305135490658; Wed, 11 May 2011 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.95] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm225734qco.13.2011.05.11.10.38.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 03:38:05 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <965E8AEC-2DF5-4A51-90E3-21D4C101E5CC@Holsman.NET> References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org congratulations guys! On May 12, 2011, at 3:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The vote on 0.20.203.0-rc1 passes. We have our first stable release in = a > year. The votes were: >=20 > 13 +1's (10 binding: Arun, Chris, Devaraj, Dhruba, Jakob, Mahadev, = Nicholas, > Owen, Sanjay, > Suresh) > 7 -1's (4 binding: Doug, Eli, Konstantin, Todd) >=20 > Konstantin, your issue with the test cases requiring a umask 02 is a = good > point. I'll patch it and can roll a 0.20.203.1 release candidate. >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-3468-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:41:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B2D0487D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28843 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:41:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28790 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:41:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28782 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:41:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:41:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:41:00 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so373689gwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sPOvSUAM6q7od/QHPAM69MM0irOJGQV4K+KankL2LRg=; b=OOFL3tB4a13MgSg8pXnBYEfiUlWubsckCWRwOdJkY9lb9W8geMuzkViV5EC/822msO ONLXWubY9jmeMXRnah/uAKkbfFfLuIKtyhI3AxhCCmnxw4mq0+VmZ5cGIE5TjKo/d4H/ dLP3Qt/2WJUieKEeQ5C3q3YkmDK4bKiBNiUjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=c1qu4xp0STtQsN4pfvBkibPtrFrqXZfyOSz6nClX4um6u3Emg75AVk4XynVU2kNEaR hVGnEZdPcpNQHqpGyKLDP8oS7gUOJs5QHEA954et3E7OX/9E0kZP2rmSY9u1dPXVmkwa cyFyCXhuVhsXGhUd1ia/boqYnISBSFWyKQmYA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.109.19 with SMTP id r19mr5485830yhg.289.1305139239747; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.124.12 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:40:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:40:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c5fc4823604a30468e0 --0023547c8c5fc4823604a30468e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Konstantin, your issue with the test cases requiring a umask 02 is a good > point. I'll patch it and can roll a 0.20.203.1 release candidate. umask is not a big concern. I reset it to standard 0022. Still there were 8 other test failures: 7 in mapred, and 1 hdfsproxy. Stable release should pass unit tests. Lets make 0.20.203.1 stable. Thanks, --Konstantin On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The vote on 0.20.203.0-rc1 passes. We have our first stable release in a > year. The votes were: > > 13 +1's (10 binding: Arun, Chris, Devaraj, Dhruba, Jakob, Mahadev, > Nicholas, > Owen, Sanjay, > Suresh) > 7 -1's (4 binding: Doug, Eli, Konstantin, Todd) > > Konstantin, your issue with the test cases requiring a umask 02 is a good > point. I'll patch it and can roll a 0.20.203.1 release candidate. > > -- Owen > --0023547c8c5fc4823604a30468e0-- From general-return-3469-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:09:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 562B44B59 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84436 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:09:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84387 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:09:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84379 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:09:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of angadi@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:32 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so911165iym.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YCstV0F+8qa1kAgOgo+y8sncPEXbclD3KPru74JwEKg=; b=t2f7Ues2KywoxUNWkzpTN6pEw4/O7RM24INiG+3cCpmV0ciafpNfIb5rfLnZQGUfvW dBnR7xeeo0Q8J81lV3zBW+ufiW8zvHaa/CUnceGX88oWq1smI8+iu2ls5stjLgh8ooi1 CUqYx1LIGTNvhl1+jLCh/r/TumbDBOpx6/qzU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Hixcc9EfGs3KOJWlaMYy0zL/1PSD96xqdL5MiNA7J1EurTDRcKKa+0M8CIBs32zzeL Nb8soeOH6oi422qgc/+UkgtewHkebqDwMw8jZryZcxfxmTUCTV4mqFVNJ1tuHWm/BSSt CNe4NjzieNN60AT1n0ztMdjFOCRhN/S2jExgg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.176.6 with SMTP id bc6mr7023950ibb.147.1305140952021; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.10.141 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Raghu Angadi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7ab3d3bc5c04a304ce1f --0016364c7ab3d3bc5c04a304ce1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congrats anad thanks to all the developers for such passion and hard work they they put into a very important project. +1 for getting new 0.20 release out with security. It is great news for users for that new apache release is finally coming out. I hope most of the technical as well as non-technical issues will resolved this or next release. There are many important issues raised in this thread and these are crucial for future of Apache Hadoop. wanted to echo one of them in particular : community is the most important aspect of the project and triumphs over the rest. I am sure the process would be much smoother going forward as we have more frequent releases. This is probably the first real test for the develop-a-large-feature-on-a-branch-and-merge process. Discussion here would certainly lead to important improvements to the process. Looking at from a different angle, Hadoop has a very enviable problem : there is so much development it is very hard to co-ordinate and scale. It has already scalled up a few times before, and with the leaders it has, it is doing it again. Raghu. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The vote on 0.20.203.0-rc1 passes. We have our first stable release in a > year. The votes were: > > 13 +1's (10 binding: Arun, Chris, Devaraj, Dhruba, Jakob, Mahadev, > Nicholas, > Owen, Sanjay, > Suresh) > 7 -1's (4 binding: Doug, Eli, Konstantin, Todd) > > Konstantin, your issue with the test cases requiring a umask 02 is a good > point. I'll patch it and can roll a 0.20.203.1 release candidate. > > -- Owen > --0016364c7ab3d3bc5c04a304ce1f-- From general-return-3470-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:21:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBA974900 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34416 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34330 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:21:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34257 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:21:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:21:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:21:22 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so581618pwi.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.17.232 with SMTP id r8mr14084652pbd.91.1305145262102; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm181106pbg.60.2011.05.11.13.20.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 13:21:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Owen O'Malley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Cleaning up documentation from website Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:20:58 -0700 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) We haven't cleaned up the version documentation in a long time: lrwxrwxr-x 1 omalley hadoop 11 May 11 20:14 current -> r0.20.203.0 drwxrwsr-x 7 cutting hadoop 29 Nov 24 2008 r0.14.4 drwxrwsr-x 6 cutting hadoop 22 Jan 23 2008 r0.15.2 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 22 Jan 23 2008 r0.15.3 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 28 Feb 8 2008 r0.16.0 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Mar 14 2008 r0.16.1 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Apr 3 2008 r0.16.2 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Apr 17 2008 r0.16.3 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 May 9 2008 r0.16.4 drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 42 May 21 2008 r0.17.0 drwxrwsr-x 5 omalley hadoop 42 Aug 20 2008 r0.17.1 drwxrwsr-x 7 omalley hadoop 43 Dec 11 2008 r0.17.2 drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 51 Aug 22 2008 r0.18.0 drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 51 Sep 18 2008 r0.18.1 drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 52 Dec 11 2008 r0.18.2 drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 52 Jan 30 2009 r0.18.3 drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 58 Dec 11 2008 r0.19.0 drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 58 Feb 24 2009 r0.19.1 drwxrwsr-x 7 tomwhite hadoop 57 Jun 30 2009 r0.19.2 drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 63 Apr 9 2009 r0.20.0 drwxrwsr-x 7 omalley hadoop 64 Mar 1 2010 r0.20.1 drwxrwxr-x 7 cdouglas hadoop 63 Aug 24 2010 r0.20.2 drwxrwxr-x 7 omalley hadoop 63 May 11 20:11 r0.20.203.0 drwxrwxr-x 7 tomwhite hadoop 31 Aug 17 2010 r0.21.0 Other than the history of who made each of the releases, there isn't a = lot of value there. I propose that we trim this down to: r0.20.2 r0.20.203.0 r0.21.0 Any concerns? If not, I'll clean up next week. -- Owen= From general-return-3471-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:55:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 993414F79 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95333 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95288 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95280 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:55:48 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Cleaning up documentation from website From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:55:45 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4DED24B1-2180-4C78-BB8A-390BBAD0132E@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 11, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We haven't cleaned up the version documentation in a long time: > > lrwxrwxr-x 1 omalley hadoop 11 May 11 20:14 current -> r0.20.203.0 ^--- this is a much more interesting discussion. (What does "current" mean now?) From general-return-3472-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:26:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2DA4456A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42366 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:26:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42312 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:26:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42304 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:26:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:25:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4BLOtB8076441; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:55 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:47 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwQId8TR15JwslTTzqga+rzSnJw+A== Message-ID: References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to get= ahead of this.=20 I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache pro= jects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues.=20 --- E14 - typing on glass On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >=20 > Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache=20 > Hadoop Compatibility: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D= 46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >=20 > I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >=20 > http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.= pdf >=20 > It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though=20 > the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both=20 > their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining=20 > what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an=20 > improvement. >=20 >=20 > I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own=20 > agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >=20 >=20 > Licensing > -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and=20 > schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, >=20 > Naming > -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions.=20 > The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's=20 > important to make clear it is a derivative work. > -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of=20 > Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate=20 > filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed > "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" >=20 > Compatibility > -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache=20 > Source tree, > -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is=20 > the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. > -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop=20 > release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and=20 > future tests pass > -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of=20 > community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the=20 > compatibility testing > -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as=20 > compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot=20 > claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the=20 > tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design").=20 > Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design"=20 > bugreps to make them more formal. >=20 > Certification > -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say "Certified" > -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible=20 > for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. > -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as=20 > "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites > -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they=20 > mean by this >=20 > This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there=20 > -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module=20 > that can be used to test real deployments. >=20 From general-return-3473-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:30:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3109A4B6D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52758 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:30:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52703 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52695 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:30:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:30:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of danharvey42@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:30:32 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so1089632vxa.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:30:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=J/MWmJB27Jt1F/HQP47VvlvcX7IPhChki7FkGMPx5kY=; b=blAGXQ5+2mr4C3YRT570TW3KXM5+purb4d35hXvtQELkcqAMthUfI0ciZkK9A6qwVk tPyCBAATs9IC63gF85EBKyKCgtGwWB5pmB1RpMYMeXmyj/EGDyVhecN4xvy19sSkyQ6w XC07aSJ9VC9hmko/7Qu+WswMdETEyf5TxbrFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=OkS4Y2qynr/GSrd0FeApZqpUBj28oJwfeU2acq7lyUnhaJYkoqWnpmlEUoV7+pPgZ4 LkOcJIcE8+KCDpxUb2/HchYwX9lCBIzK2SkficH7bNSS0aLbiNvdDgWGNKhwFXXQY9CS h9jsCuCtBOq4JDb0widbgLVKJRAnYIuM6dlPQ= Received: by 10.52.74.99 with SMTP id s3mr2094913vdv.108.1305149411247; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:30:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.226 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCA6997.2040200@apache.org> From: Dan Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:29:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'll be heading there too, probably there till Thursday/Friday so could attend a hackathon after the conference. It would be great if it wasn't the same time as the HBase hackathon which is planned for the 8th, or could be combined with it if it's better on the Wednesday? I'm not sure who's organising that... On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > I can do a tour of the MR-279 codebase but I am currently flying out on the afternoon of Wednesday. Let me see if I can change the flight bookings. > > > On 5/11/11 3:48 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > > On 11/05/2011 03:12, Devaraj Das wrote: >> I'll be there .. Looking forward to meeting up with Ian and the other Hadoop'ers... >> > > > OK, there's now a tentative plan for a Hadoop hackathon, i'd like a > volunteer to do a tour of the MR-279 codebase, and we have a volunteer > to talk about gridmix. > > http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/hadoop-hackathon > > Being a hackathon and all, some coding theme would be good. Testing MR-279? > > From general-return-3474-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:31:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A49642CB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54429 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:31:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54331 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54323 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:31:32 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4BLTLMl054661 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305149361; bh=kS15+hYwUZT4TpgKq8v6Oelw99wpRNHROFxFC619nPA=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=C5L7/8WOCpROB8hGoJa9pJr9VhkQl1lfnIj3Bz0uIfqxCZQ9VI48CBuN3cTE7nrgo 5VcCDvUwyT2POOaMtWgDo3uJwNyDV9hRH/iexuLNlpiRBKp2LPRvv4F5tDAU2PS8Pk mYGRHaxFgakablsbgE0Db+uYguGO+ybnScIhKlB0= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:21 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:19 -0700 Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Topic: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Thread-Index: AcwPjIxsJoki/2MDQ0iivHxen22nTAACnhCiACLd8jQ= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I am getting the final metrics patch HDFS-1117 in. Also here is the list Jitendra had compiled about some of the HDFS patches flagged as not in trunk: HDFS-1020 - Yes, incorporated into 1201 HDFS-1022 - NA for trunk HDFS-1136 - Yes, Fixed in hdfs-1178 HDFS-1153 - NO HDFS-1158 - YES/NO, This issue is covered by HDFS-1161. Filed separate issues for the suggested enhancements. by Eli. HDFS-1313 - YES, It was backport of HDFS-481. HDFS-495 - NA for trunk HDFS-6599 - Is it HADOOP-6599? HADOOP-6599 is committed in common trunk. HDFS-740 - This redirects to HADOOP-6344, which is committed to trunk. On 5/10/11 9:50 PM, "Devaraj Das" wrote: > I will get to MR-2178 soon. I & Chris had done a draft of the port to tru= nk a > few months ago. Hopefully, it is easy to continue from there and merge ..= . >=20 >=20 > On 5/10/11 8:34 PM, "Tom White" wrote: >=20 > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> Awesome. >>=20 >> I'm sorry to miss this (I'm neck deep in MR-279), but a heads up on forw= ard >> porting from my end: >> # Luke and Suresh are sick of me bugging them and just rolled up their >> sleeves to finish up all of the metrics2 work! Thanks guys! I've >> reviewed/committed Luke's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6= 919 >> and Suresh finished up the rest. >> # I'll work with Devaraj/Chris to finish up the TT security hole >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178). >=20 > Thanks Arun - that's great! >=20 > Tom >=20 >>=20 >> thanks, >> Arun >>=20 >> On May 9, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>=20 >>> Hey, >>>=20 >>> We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from >>> organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, >>> StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, Micha= el >>> Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been waiting t= o >>> get >>> involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! >>>=20 >>> We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo Alt= o >>> and >>> want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at >>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Jeff >>>=20 >>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hey, >>>>=20 >>>> The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great >>>> job >>>> of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done= a >>>> great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading >>>> through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two >>>> things: >>>>=20 >>>> 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk >>>> 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again >>>>=20 >>>> To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Faceb= ook >>>> would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the = 13 >>>> (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port >>>> the >>>> work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. >>>>=20 >>>> Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Pal= o >>>> Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following >>>> Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short >>>> order. >>>> PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC >>>> members >>>> Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. >>>>=20 >>>> Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your >>>> name, >>>> now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forw= ard >>>> porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and >>>> you'll >>>> have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and >>>> submission process. >>>>=20 >>>> To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to >>>> http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. >>>>=20 >>>> As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera= SF >>>> offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't >>>> make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. >>>>=20 >>>> Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! >>>>=20 >>>> Regards, >>>> Jeff >>>>=20 >>>> p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll >>>> see >>>> about how we can teleconference you into the event. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3475-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:43:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD1264E69 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70409 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70345 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70331 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:43:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:05 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Hgg0LEoZU57zaz9vsEx8B0Xz5p3qXUXkwdsQgnR/z6K2Gpsk4CtEcCVg +8ABl87vcCXPi6dTUxJoLEm48ryPSrVR7vbqxehtyT88mJkqgWAUcyPWW XmFui7+MiibnS0n; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305150185; x=1336686185; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=mhZ3y4JljQ4/xqUuEWYeThJRpreCea7Qjtd/Timorww=; b=qNHWqHtb7OTxnut8YpkIkgsH5/p/aSBsM5f+L5DbVuK1F8fu3HdnuVs3 jbv7TC5KQnCRaa+Y/+V3A2MCy9JJjEhtrFyZcOpUsQDVqzOdb4kFhiOuE 3t/b6k6AI7tvH5A; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,354,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23092385" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:46:18 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMDv3EIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSImxGA//+PqQA= Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:46:18 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under ASL 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK testsuite." - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to >get ahead of this. > >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. > >--- >E14 - typing on glass > >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > >>=20 >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>=20 >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>=20 >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>=20 >>=20 >>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1. >>pdf >>=20 >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an >> improvement. >>=20 >>=20 >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>=20 >>=20 >> Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, >>=20 >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" >>=20 >> Compatibility >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> Source tree, >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and >> future tests pass >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> compatibility testing >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>=20 >> Certification >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>"Certified" >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> mean by this >>=20 >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>=20 From general-return-3476-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:50:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75FC64577 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83988 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:50:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83915 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:50:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83907 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:50:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:50:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.86.168.182] (HELO mxout-07.mxes.net) (216.86.168.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:50:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.196] (unknown [69.170.160.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C071B22E257 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:49:58 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? From: Chris K Wensel In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:49:57 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DCA6997.2040200@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) i'll be there and speaking. but traveling on thursday, so will miss the = hackathon unless its moved up. ckw On May 11, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Dan wrote: > I'll be heading there too, probably there till Thursday/Friday so > could attend a hackathon after the conference. >=20 > It would be great if it wasn't the same time as the HBase hackathon > which is planned for the 8th, or could be combined with it if it's > better on the Wednesday? I'm not sure who's organising that... >=20 > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Devaraj Das = wrote: >> I can do a tour of the MR-279 codebase but I am currently flying out = on the afternoon of Wednesday. Let me see if I can change the flight = bookings. >>=20 >>=20 >> On 5/11/11 3:48 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >>=20 >> On 11/05/2011 03:12, Devaraj Das wrote: >>> I'll be there .. Looking forward to meeting up with Ian and the = other Hadoop'ers... >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> OK, there's now a tentative plan for a Hadoop hackathon, i'd like a >> volunteer to do a tour of the MR-279 codebase, and we have a = volunteer >> to talk about gridmix. >>=20 >> http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/hadoop-hackathon >>=20 >> Being a hackathon and all, some coding theme would be good. Testing = MR-279? >>=20 >>=20 -- Chris K Wensel chris@concurrentinc.com http://www.concurrentinc.com -- Concurrent, Inc. offers mentoring, support for Cascading From general-return-3477-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:11:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C73FC4049 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18179 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:11:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18132 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:11:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18124 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:11:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:11:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:10:52 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so641153pwi.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.149.20 with SMTP id w20mr5608932wfd.137.1305151831202; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p40sm600972wfc.19.2011.05.11.15.10.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 15:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0 From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:10:27 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <12853C59-08F1-4F98-ACF3-800F06BC7A5F@apache.org> <61C1E656-0649-4097-8709-FDC596ED57E9@yahoo-inc.com> <8D047C89-6430-4FDE-A9C4-CFEE79644AC6@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 11, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > umask is not a big concern. I reset it to standard 0022. It still should be fixed. > Still there were 8 other test failures: 7 in mapred, and 1 hdfsproxy. > Stable release should pass unit tests. All unit tests pass for me. Others have also run the unit tests and had = them pass. If you can figure out what is going wrong, that would be great. > Lets make 0.20.203.1 stable. +1 -- Owen= From general-return-3478-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:12:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47E8540CC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21595 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21548 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21540 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:12:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:12:51 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4BMCDb8061306; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305151933; bh=ECtTnxhv05l7zIEGO/7paVEX43AM4QLk0YJ8P2Zgiwc=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=RHbHvjH5lqdftiQ1ZqlK9/gBStADNJfimECpF9nFxylFBsp09fPF05Vn6wpC6fMTW A7PiGZTRfttX7Jvh2jR7YdRIR38haFWylxAXo63YG1XPjRR0sC9c54cAOcKlERgv8I wZGwkuMZH85QEr6tuSmVJ9NXhzbsaMuEBtuZvW0s= Message-Id: <1057A159-BE13-47D2-B746-1A66F0DBC982@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "Aaron T. Myers" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-427218634 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Release compatibility was Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc1 Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:12:12 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-2-427218634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On May 10, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Devaraj Das > wrote: > > ..... > > By far the most significant incompatibility that I've seen from a user > perspective is that setting hadoop.job.ugi no longer has any effect. > Granted, this interface wasn't used by a large percentage of users, > but > those that were using it have no other alternative that is as > flexible as > this was. There was discussion about this incompatibility last > September on > the mailing lists[1]. The conclusion there was that supporting > backward > compatibility for this interface was too difficult, semantically and > technically, to warrant support. This incompatibility is present > whether or > not Kerberos support is enabled on the cluster. That I why we added the interface audience and stability classification. From the very beginning (see my early proposals on HADOOP-5073) the security UGI interfaces were targeted to be marked as limited private. We completed the interface annotation in release 21, so some users did not realize that they should not be using such interfaces. sanjay --Apple-Mail-2-427218634-- From general-return-3479-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:36:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D7D54351 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60357 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:36:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60302 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:36:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60294 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:36:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:43 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so687809qwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=kgexXDvs18zkzUcQ4b9wYY+QA+hMsO0f+6QfkqkG+gw=; b=ImGXB4ilg43DzDaCMMoNjSOQ4zwbb0fQj+YZ6NEzzsqKddZ7IHKLBw8FfFHi7jR22b 0yk6lFhjzhSYTzpL3PJjUT0uMuX6Pit1Jnc9mhjPeUmFJyBh42eCD/a506bndWXGQafO 12pIc2R8bZ+P6ckQbpyDDaihEfSnUjIS6L8iU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=j0+rv+GXAv37NPxLZnonvBhS+2iP40qaUDzLGbb/l9ZrQL/hU+rqRTe9JEBBDlEg1T L0fCjpswJC6ivWZ+gCgfTQHKF2Bk/CgJcyU3/+r0UOup7HTxtTkIW/J6OUa6Eh+BYpwp KacvAz1fbHLw4U23sbqPThdIn8s3zjWsvS+Bs= Received: by 10.224.2.136 with SMTP id 8mr714573qaj.394.1305153382747; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.95] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm366097qcg.5.2011.05.11.15.36.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 15:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Cleaning up documentation from website From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:36:16 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I think we need a 0.18 doc's as some people are still running this. other than that (and what is 'current'.. it should point to the stable = release imho) I'm good with it. On May 12, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We haven't cleaned up the version documentation in a long time: >=20 > lrwxrwxr-x 1 omalley hadoop 11 May 11 20:14 current -> r0.20.203.0 > drwxrwsr-x 7 cutting hadoop 29 Nov 24 2008 r0.14.4 > drwxrwsr-x 6 cutting hadoop 22 Jan 23 2008 r0.15.2 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 22 Jan 23 2008 r0.15.3 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 28 Feb 8 2008 r0.16.0 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Mar 14 2008 r0.16.1 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Apr 3 2008 r0.16.2 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 Apr 17 2008 r0.16.3 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 36 May 9 2008 r0.16.4 > drwxrwsr-x 6 nigel hadoop 42 May 21 2008 r0.17.0 > drwxrwsr-x 5 omalley hadoop 42 Aug 20 2008 r0.17.1 > drwxrwsr-x 7 omalley hadoop 43 Dec 11 2008 r0.17.2 > drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 51 Aug 22 2008 r0.18.0 > drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 51 Sep 18 2008 r0.18.1 > drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 52 Dec 11 2008 r0.18.2 > drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 52 Jan 30 2009 r0.18.3 > drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 58 Dec 11 2008 r0.19.0 > drwxrwsr-x 8 nigel hadoop 58 Feb 24 2009 r0.19.1 > drwxrwsr-x 7 tomwhite hadoop 57 Jun 30 2009 r0.19.2 > drwxrwsr-x 7 nigel hadoop 63 Apr 9 2009 r0.20.0 > drwxrwsr-x 7 omalley hadoop 64 Mar 1 2010 r0.20.1 > drwxrwxr-x 7 cdouglas hadoop 63 Aug 24 2010 r0.20.2 > drwxrwxr-x 7 omalley hadoop 63 May 11 20:11 r0.20.203.0 > drwxrwxr-x 7 tomwhite hadoop 31 Aug 17 2010 r0.21.0 >=20 > Other than the history of who made each of the releases, there isn't a = lot of value there. I propose that we trim this down to: >=20 > r0.20.2 > r0.20.203.0 > r0.21.0 >=20 > Any concerns? If not, I'll clean up next week. >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-3480-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:42:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8668744B0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66795 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:42:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66737 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:42:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66729 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:42:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:42:28 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so1153335vxa.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=1Ped8hsQjBjz2NQYzo8nUOdPtAOCdmlzvmNVEKBTcUA=; b=l18ZTDpYxjXAY2MBDve/XwcoXVApUlB9EPvy+5+7Klu7gcQw7x6H5vgoebFwhl5JSL wuLGujGeuhaBOGf4Da18NRkaVaGewyN/v292IS/5qU/p8KqC3R15TzHbMy/2paIQXd2W 1iDgX61Q6ycBMWWwQpa/q02ieoNCvwNFT+HbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=fApK+51WMPGXbW7Q5fl79VDDAElVN7cyLrpjjwCuYeSdkcMV4wgF7RjnKpCxr0FJrD 7zkW2iXe4bJ+tHNIO/Tr0LXaFzBdzAfq7mb6oyb5pxiekp10/rInexixS6zgax1/Gggt ZOoXST9CiQuZvY3fe9let4uxRnSycFoc9U0SI= Received: by 10.52.179.131 with SMTP id dg3mr985944vdc.9.1305153727788; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.95] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm96891vdh.27.2011.05.11.15.42.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 15:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:42:01 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) For apache (httpd I'm assuming you mean). we define compatibility as = adherence to the set of RFC's that define the HTTP protocol. I'm no expert in this (Roy is though), but we could attempt to do = something similar when it comes to HDFS/Map-Reduce protocols. I'm not = sure what benefit there would be to going to a RFC, as opposed to = documenting the API on our site. On May 12, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need = to get ahead of this.=20 >=20 > I would be really interested in learning of any experience other = apache projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues.=20 >=20 > --- > E14 - typing on glass >=20 > On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache=20= >> Hadoop Compatibility: >> = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D4= 6B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>=20 >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>=20 >> = http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.p= df >>=20 >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though=20= >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both=20= >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining=20= >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is = an=20 >> improvement. >>=20 >>=20 >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own=20 >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>=20 >>=20 >> Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and=20= >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of = this, >>=20 >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their = opinions.=20 >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's=20= >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of=20= >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate=20 >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem = XYZ" >>=20 >> Compatibility >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache=20 >> Source tree, >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is=20= >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop=20 >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and=20= >> future tests pass >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of=20 >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the=20 >> compatibility testing >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as=20 >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot=20= >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the=20= >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design").=20= >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design"=20 >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>=20 >> Certification >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say = "Certified" >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible=20= >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as=20= >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test = suites >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they=20= >> mean by this >>=20 >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there=20= >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test = module=20 >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>=20 From general-return-3481-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:57:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7235B4C17 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78212 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78169 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:57:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78161 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:57:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:57:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of apache@jacobrideout.net designates 74.50.50.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.50.50.180] (HELO jacobrideout.net) (74.50.50.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:57:16 +0000 Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jacobrideout.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BED35400B5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:56:54 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jacobrideout.net; s=2009a; t=1305154615; bh=/S0qYIAxAxzGHoQhnCeHPODXPdTa0Blq+cn1KMZv7Ws=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Yz+iQllo78swHe8mLM0qRR4F7rFgZOs/8iAK/2ZuIAxE7z8y2g7RUIx6Z/Sdbu4YA mN/+3r2KOqrMEFitaykM3BH4rEkzP2vIEZwrH2C1JCNoSiOTEuCxyBWZMdezytRwD1 RQhLN+jGQwTIvWJusYIpuGMR8QzilaB55APCy7O8= Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1386608bwz.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.38.88 with SMTP id a24mr525307bke.130.1305154613218; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:56:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.28 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:56:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> From: Jacob R Rideout Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:56:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What about defining compatibility as fully implementing all the public-stable annotated interfaces for a particular release? Jacob Rideout On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > For apache (httpd I'm assuming you mean). we define compatibility as adhe= rence to the set of RFC's that define the HTTP protocol. > > I'm no expert in this (Roy is though), but we could attempt to do somethi= ng similar when it comes to HDFS/Map-Reduce protocols. I'm not sure what be= nefit there would be to going to a RFC, as opposed to documenting the API o= n our site. > > > On May 12, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > >> This is a really interesting topic! =C2=A0I completely agree that we nee= d to get ahead of this. >> >> I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache = projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >> >> --- >> E14 - typing on glass >> >> On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: >> >>> >>> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >>> Hadoop Compatibility: >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C= 4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>> >>> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>> >>> http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_= 1.pdf >>> >>> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >>> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >>> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >>> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an >>> improvement. >>> >>> >>> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>> >>> >>> Licensing >>> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >>> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, >>> >>> Naming >>> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. >>> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >>> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >>> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" >>> >>> Compatibility >>> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >>> Source tree, >>> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >>> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and >>> future tests pass >>> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >>> compatibility testing >>> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >>> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >>> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >>> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >>> bugreps to make them more formal. >>> >>> Certification >>> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say "Certified= " >>> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible >>> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >>> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suite= s >>> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >>> mean by this >>> >>> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >>> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module >>> that can be used to test real deployments. >>> > > From general-return-3482-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:21:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 750104D2F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5294 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:21:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5239 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:21:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5230 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:21:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:21:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:21:01 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so665277pve.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=aogb/1XFzzPVavCRTIzmVXuYqXAtccDycywXmlkho40=; b=h6y3cDhNvCMbE/wP5HUhocS7lt5Jmwd+Ok8OLOr9FWxGQWsjRjjpjxppEY8AneDRgZ aKrsnGNwjxplza8XOM2douAQqsQC7sUS65MxH3rFJFXDIlLLSVwkKKC1U+GsJLkyYIXm m2Z3dKq5X9XFtqtT7Pl9juoAmPTrnPREDqpgo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=X06vv6EMMjwyAcf2Zo+2NxU6cNMwFOEZ+WcpB7HsiB5bYexf3Haf2861JTep5pNa7u Ib+usjOcOdxYpvMCUrA9s7gH52PkJnmLrF8/WahmRmnFWBv8iXv+vJ8mU7v/ASPOMkcr PlcUCGTnW1LZatB0yQV8gS+PSKJPHtiHyxMCM= Received: by 10.68.4.201 with SMTP id m9mr14674557pbm.177.1305156041052; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.62.34 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520e52134115d04a308524e --bcaec520e52134115d04a308524e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What does it mean to "implement" those interfaces? I'm +1 for a TCK-based definition. In addition to statically implementing a set of interfaces, each interface also implicitly includes a set of acceptable inputs and predicted outputs (or ranges of outputs) for those inputs. - Aaron On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jacob R Rideout wrote: > What about defining compatibility as fully implementing all the > public-stable annotated interfaces for a particular release? > > Jacob Rideout > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > For apache (httpd I'm assuming you mean). we define compatibility as > adherence to the set of RFC's that define the HTTP protocol. > > > > I'm no expert in this (Roy is though), but we could attempt to do > something similar when it comes to HDFS/Map-Reduce protocols. I'm not sure > what benefit there would be to going to a RFC, as opposed to documenting the > API on our site. > > > > > > On May 12, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > > > >> This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to > get ahead of this. > >> > >> I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache > projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. > >> > >> --- > >> E14 - typing on glass > >> > >> On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache > >>> Hadoop Compatibility: > >>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet > >>> > >>> > http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.pdf > >>> > >>> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though > >>> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both > >>> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining > >>> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an > >>> improvement. > >>> > >>> > >>> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own > >>> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us > >>> > >>> > >>> Licensing > >>> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License > >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > >>> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and > >>> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, > >>> > >>> Naming > >>> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. > >>> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's > >>> important to make clear it is a derivative work. > >>> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of > >>> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate > >>> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed > >>> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" > >>> > >>> Compatibility > >>> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache > >>> Source tree, > >>> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is > >>> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. > >>> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop > >>> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and > >>> future tests pass > >>> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of > >>> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the > >>> compatibility testing > >>> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as > >>> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot > >>> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the > >>> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). > >>> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" > >>> bugreps to make them more formal. > >>> > >>> Certification > >>> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say > "Certified" > >>> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible > >>> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. > >>> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as > >>> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test > suites > >>> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they > >>> mean by this > >>> > >>> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there > >>> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module > >>> that can be used to test real deployments. > >>> > > > > > --bcaec520e52134115d04a308524e-- From general-return-3483-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 01:04:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C14466E for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16347 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:04:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16292 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16284 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 01:04:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:04:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:04:34 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4C144Qn009000 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305162244; bh=++IxRMYS8L7tVRhqs0F1avTHp8d1LGxMIAM7o6BbtRA=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=KZFSxKeYor716dgxtzhXIMdWvkO9NbilYvo8tyM/gDqIqfBBXbdW0FV4w3gTBTNO0 EznICApvF4nCkczcxk7XqxXkjUnSBmO4xlNd60+qjX/8W5IsUioUz4gGXfp6WojPWD Av3LufBACQBPhjZyeeCV0v22LBr2A7lkDFxYYyyQ= Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:04:04 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was looking to forward porting MR-2358. The original 20.203 does not apply because trunk has lots of improvements in MR since 20 due to context objects. The attached trunk patch does not look correct. I will post a correct trunk patch if indeed the bug still exists in trunk. Further the bug fixed by 2358 only surfaced during the testing of viewfs. Since viewfs is not part of 22 I would not worry about this one for 22. sanjay On May 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a > great job > of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also > done a > great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading > through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two > things: > > 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk > 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again > > To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and > Facebook > would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down > the 13 > (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward- > port the > work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. > > Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our > Palo Alto > and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following > Wednesday, > 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short order. PMC > members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC > members Eli > Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. > > Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your > name, > now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. > Forward > porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and > you'll > have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and > submission process. > > To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the > Cloudera SF > offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you > can't make > it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. > > Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! > > Regards, > Jeff > > p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and > I'll see > about how we can teleconference you into the event. From general-return-3484-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 02:26:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743B950EE for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63861 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 02:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63804 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 02:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63796 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 02:26:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcsrivas@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:26:23 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so740755pzk.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:26:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6BevyoxSZxR9KfMF/vREoE2rGC94qA40BMpa5pGKnik=; b=U5ALXtxSbOQzvSA3OcVBGBSlO8AQzIs7Nz3yqs/gBzyW7QBO2gQRK1Puh0O+dtTqx2 4BzmmJQrxoJS4Mk+1a1uyEPdQ3HyhUFA1DRsSbA2J6VuxrGz5Gev6Keo6jcBuhpnq9Wk 3vwWayNUeNlfzeHBPIdPVr6rzoXiVXca2/CRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QnWQKI0WkabpySHf0Q6IzDBAkYkZTvSuhUgO5r42G8Ep5iP1y1B3OyZ6AaCv7jE6Zt xcVtCcyf1m/ioiA0wqB9HuiRFR0CQMJx236RWg3tzWGWJb4aORWlfSbd+rJV4HZT3EFR oy+An8LJQD/PsKxTDpPprkkElQozBDVnYyPaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.59.169 with SMTP id a9mr3043831pbr.60.1305167163385; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.56.193 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:26:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:26:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: "M. C. Srivas" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53af1682566c504a30ae993 --bcaec53af1682566c504a30ae993 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is "compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is meant by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like the IEEE POSIX specifications. For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that specifies all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. It clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to support, and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use at one's own risk. Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and the specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the code is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine corner cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs is not specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream into a library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what is then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call returns? Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail such things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro spaces, but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the users of Hadoop. It provides them (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from vendor lock-in. Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the HCK itself will be buggy initially). On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop > Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under ASL > 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK testsuite." > > - milind > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > > > > > > > On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: > > >This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to > >get ahead of this. > > > >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache > >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. > > > >--- > >E14 - typing on glass > > > >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > > > >> > >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache > >> Hadoop Compatibility: > >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D > >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E > >> > >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet > >> > >> > >>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1 > . > >>pdf > >> > >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though > >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both > >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining > >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an > >> improvement. > >> > >> > >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own > >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us > >> > >> > >> Licensing > >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License > >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and > >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, > >> > >> Naming > >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. > >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's > >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. > >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of > >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate > >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed > >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" > >> > >> Compatibility > >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache > >> Source tree, > >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is > >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. > >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop > >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and > >> future tests pass > >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of > >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the > >> compatibility testing > >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as > >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot > >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the > >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). > >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" > >> bugreps to make them more formal. > >> > >> Certification > >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say > >>"Certified" > >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible > >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. > >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as > >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites > >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they > >> mean by this > >> > >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there > >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module > >> that can be used to test real deployments. > >> > > --bcaec53af1682566c504a30ae993-- From general-return-3485-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 04:17:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B9265F66 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28620 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:17:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28567 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28559 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 04:17:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:17:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jameswarren3@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:17:29 +0000 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so568673yia.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=3doTDzlyH6jsFiIIKOwsd9BFjbTZCs9ehdy27y0JSCM=; b=YTFoAKNocyF1cHo1h5EzJXB8UcYkbc/KBHNGi1nkpvpCSF3lFknl4DSRTPEEF8hkUU Rmm6cGS3VXHdzzOk6bmMqrT8QM6v/vx4Q7Xhd0RRlaN5uy3bLjwXifazBRf03ig64Vi1 QWpcbz1FSDu1enGeO2kztvTb2ZnYjfCDLLT0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Xu7yC2zKuXyZ2Q2EPfUmfgYtcNYI24Hqb4wYv4PL0ZxK86hzQBTUIav+QrPP8p0oi1 VcNuFi/HyZAyKBNjg97xdYlMH55qZpCyCa+kZUP8OncpnFotKdC0P1tqyIjy/bAHf5Dk Hn9CtOFg/k5CiHYHOTYQMH4IV0zqk/jK45xOQ= Received: by 10.236.95.140 with SMTP id p12mr11040490yhf.191.1305173828235; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:17:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: james.warren@stanfordalumni.org Sender: jameswarren3@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.110.16 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Warren Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: q-lSF3kO6MFETztpIaep0ZKVu-I Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathons: 5/11 and 5/18 in SF and Palo Alto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c3366f0ec04a30c76b1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023547c8c3366f0ec04a30c76b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Many thanks to Cloudera for hosting today's hackathons! Under the helpful guidance of Eli Collins, I submitted my first patch. It's great to get off the sidelines and into the game. +1 for more of these community building events. Thanks again, -James Warren On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > We've got 23 folks signed up for the Hackathon this Wednesday from > organizations like Cloudera, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, Trend Micro, > StumbleUpon, and Ngmoco. We'll also have the VP of the HBase PMC, Michael > Stack, and the VP of the Hive PMC, John Sichi. If you've been waiting to > get > involved in Apache Hadoop, development, now is the time! > > We've got room for 10 - 15 more. If you're in San Francisco or Palo Alto > and > want to help out with Apache Hadoop development, sign up at > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > The discussion this week about the 0.20.203.0 release has done a great > job > > of highlighting some issues in our development process; it's also done a > > great job of lifting our mailing list activity metrics. After reading > > through the various threads, it's clear that everyone agrees on two > things: > > > > 1) We'd like to get the work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk > > 2) We'd like to start releasing off of trunk again > > > > To that end, a few folks from Yahoo!, Cloudera, StumbleUpon, and Facebook > > would like to put together a series of Hackathons to 1) burn down the 13 > > (only 13!) remaining blockers for the 0.22 release and 2) forward-port > the > > work done in the 0.20.x branches into trunk. > > > > Cloudera will be hosting Hackathons from 10 am to 6 pm in both our Palo > > Alto and San Francisco offices next Wednesday, 5/11, and the following > > Wednesday, 5/18, to ensure both of these tasks get completed in short > order. > > PMC members Todd Lipcon and Tom White will lead the SF group and PMC > members > > Eli Collins and Patrick Hunt will lead the Palo Alto group. > > > > Whether you're a long-time contributor or don't have a patch to your > name, > > now is a great time to get involved in Apache Hadoop development. Forward > > porting patches is a lot easier than writing them from scratch, and > you'll > > have mentors present to help guide you through the patch testing and > > submission process. > > > > To sign up for the 5/11 Hackathon in either SF or PA, head over to > > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > > > As a reminder, the SF HUG will be held on 5/11 at 6 pm in the Cloudera SF > > offices: http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/17354462/. If you can't > > make it on 5/11, we'll send out a link next week for the 5/18 event. > > > > Looking forward to getting the release train moving again! > > > > Regards, > > Jeff > > > > p.s. if you'd like to participate remotely, email me directly and I'll > see > > about how we can teleconference you into the event. > > > > > > > --0023547c8c3366f0ec04a30c76b1-- From general-return-3486-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 04:38:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 445CE502E for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42851 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:38:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42774 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42766 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 04:38:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:38:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:38:37 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so1372562vxa.35 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.110.135 with SMTP id ia7mr4229701vdb.294.1305175096100; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:38:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:37:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:37:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5486072f9077704a30cc1fd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5486072f9077704a30cc1fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As a specific example of how these are important, over in Mahout-land we have been wrestling with determining just what it means to have dependencies in the lib directory inside a jar. This isn't documented, behaves differently in different versions of Hadoop and means that some Mahout programs work sometimes, but fail in high-profile locations like Twitter. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:26 PM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > Such specifications are vitally important when > implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an > application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream into > a > library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what is > then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call > returns? > --bcaec5486072f9077704a30cc1fd-- From general-return-3487-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 07:12:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6712657E1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66473 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 07:12:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66080 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 07:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66072 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 07:12:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:12:39 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so533303ewy.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:12:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.46.214 with SMTP id r62mr4309368eeb.99.1305184338765; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:12:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:12:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cleaning up documentation from website From: Eli Collins To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wednesday, May 11, 2011, Ian Holsman wrote: > I think we need a 0.18 doc's as some people are still running this. > other than that (and what is 'current'.. it should point to the stable release imho) I'm good with it. There are some non trivial 0.19 clusters running too. What is our definition of stable release? Stable normally means no new features, just enhancements and bug fixes. And API stability. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3488-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 09:13:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C14415C97 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97281 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97183 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97175 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:13:28 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:13:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.42.176]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:13:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:13:23 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'll be there, but only for the conference on Monday and Tuesday. Doug On 05/11/2011 12:31 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:08, Steve Loughran wrote: >> On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> >>> If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. >>> >>> http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ >>> >> >> 1. I'm going to be there > > 1.1. > me too, but only for the conference on Mon + Tue. > Who's available for a Hadoop/Apache/etc food + beverages on Monday evening? > > Bernd From general-return-3489-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 09:23:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A88A5234 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4998 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:23:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4948 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:23:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4940 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:23:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:23:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:23:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA81B7E3C for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:23:20 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8iFiwQ7sQNW5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:23:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6023FB7E3F for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:23:19 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305796987.23926@AVvdiBsLQ7w1oaPZwxfTWw Received: from [16.24.209.249] (jleen.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.24.209.249]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4C9N6dS001605 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:23:06 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCBA6F5.90006@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:23:01 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4C9N6dS001605 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 11/05/2011 22:24, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to get ahead of this. > > I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. I don't know about apache httpd Tomcat is the JCP reference implementation of JSP, the JSP Jar is broadly reused, and the JCP program defines a test kit (with licensing T&Cs) to define compatibility. That is because the JCP program was designed to split specification from implementation. Hadoop doesn't have that, which is a strength and a weakness. Strong: agility. Weakness: compatibility between versions as well as with others. I think Sun NFS might be a good example of similar defacto standard, or MS SMB -it is up to others to show they are compatible with what is effective the reference implementation. Being closed source, there is no option for anyone to include SunOS NFS or MS SMB in their products -the issue of "how much of SunOS NFS to include before you have to stop calling it that" never arose. From general-return-3490-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 09:33:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72CB2558B for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14463 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:33:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14407 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:33:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14399 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:33:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:33:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:33:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569EDB7EBE for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:33:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 355DBJ40t5Pf for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:33:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EEBB7EB3 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:33:03 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305797571.9747@b0jqKJWy0m2uIebuzcUTAQ Received: from [16.24.209.249] (jleen.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.24.209.249]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4C9WpUb002165 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:32:51 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCBA93E.2050005@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:32:46 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4C9WpUb002165 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/05/2011 03:26, M. C. Srivas wrote: > While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is > "compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is meant > by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like the > IEEE POSIX specifications. > > For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that specifies > all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. It > clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to support, > and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use at > one's own risk. I have been known to be critical of standards bodies in the past http://www.waterfall2006.com/loughran.html And I've been in them. It is absolutely essential that the Hadoop stack doesn't become controlled by a standards body, as then you become controlled by whoever can afford to send the most people to the standards events -and make behind the scenes deals with others to get votes through. > Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and the > specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the code > is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine corner > cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs is not > specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when > implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an > application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream into a > library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what is > then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call > returns? > > Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail such > things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro spaces, > but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. > > Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the users of > Hadoop. It provides them > (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs# +1 > (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from vendor > lock-in. =0 They won't be hadoop implementations, they will be "something that is compatible with the Apache Hadoop API as defined in v 0.x of the Hadoop compatibility kit". Furthermore, there's the issue of any google patents -while google have given Hadoop permission to them, that may not apply to other things that implement compatible APIs. I also think that the Hadoop team need to be the one's who own the interfaces and tests, define the tests as a functional test suite for testing Hadoop distributions, and reserve the right to make changes to the interfaces, semantics and tests as suits the teams needs. The input from others -especially related community projects- are important, but, to be ruthless, the compatibility issues with things that aren't really Apache Hadoop are less important. you choose to reimplement Hadoop, you take on the costs of staying current. > > Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the HCK > itself will be buggy initially). From general-return-3491-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 09:34:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99C605891 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17541 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:34:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17494 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17486 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:34:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:34:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:34:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618BA1BA98E for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:34:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MWn6mKr+39oo for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:34:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C7B1BA96E for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:34:11 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1305797639.63819@igY1648vUPtCM24qMdnKKQ Received: from [16.24.209.249] (jleen.emea.hpqcorp.net [16.24.209.249]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4C9Xu5c002209 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:33:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DCBA97F.5010200@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:33:51 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4C9Xu5c002209 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 12/05/2011 00:20, Aaron Kimball wrote: > What does it mean to "implement" those interfaces? I'm +1 for a TCK-based > definition. In addition to statically implementing a set of interfaces, each > interface also implicitly includes a set of acceptable inputs and predicted > outputs (or ranges of outputs) for those inputs. > +1: Parnas's definition of "interface" is signature+semantics. Java interface files just define the signature, not behaviour. A test kit is needed. From general-return-3492-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 09:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D845EAF for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31461 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31402 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31394 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:49:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:49:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:49:21 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4C9mvUu026282 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:48:57 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 33E9541C21A6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:48:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com ([10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id PQZD6z7hqaGHD0GR for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:48:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4C9mvNe023551; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:48:57 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:48:56 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 04:49:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwQic86KG3YNpOOReaZJbYFy54s+Q== Message-ID: <003DD45B-DBE7-47F1-BB51-7566C47E239A@navteq.com> References: <4DCBA93E.2050005@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DCBA93E.2050005@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_003DD45BDBE747F1BB517566C47E239Anavteqcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_003DD45BDBE747F1BB517566C47E239Anavteqcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 While IANAL... As long as any implementation follows Apache's license regarding derivative works, it's fair game. (this is my understanding YMMV) The APL is very liberal in what one can do with a derivative work... Surely Apache has some lawyers who can summarize what is allowable when talking about a derivative work and what is not? Note these are my opinions only and do not reflect the opinions of anyone else. Any resemblance to a coherent thought is pure coincidence..... Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 12, 2011, at 4:33 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from vendor lock-in. =0 They won't be hadoop implementations, they will be "something that is compatible with the Apache Hadoop API as defined in v 0.x of the Hadoop compatibility kit". Furthermore, there's the issue of any google patents -while google have given Hadoop permission to them, that may not apply to other things that implement compatible APIs. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. --_000_003DD45BDBE747F1BB517566C47E239Anavteqcom_-- From general-return-3493-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 15:45:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3BD45E39 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11010 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10963 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10955 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 15:45:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:45:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:45:07 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so1914172vws.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 08:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.181.99 with SMTP id dv3mr544411vdc.14.1305215086238; Thu, 12 May 2011 08:44:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 08:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:44:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a5bd921c7204a31611aa --bcaec548a5bd921c7204a31611aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I will be there Monday-Thursday. Monday sounds good for food and beverages. On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I'll be there, but only for the conference on Monday and Tuesday. > > Doug > > On 05/11/2011 12:31 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:08, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: > >>> > >>> If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. > >>> > >>> http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ > >>> > >> > >> 1. I'm going to be there > > > > 1.1. > > me too, but only for the conference on Mon + Tue. > > Who's available for a Hadoop/Apache/etc food + beverages on Monday > evening? > > > > Bernd > --bcaec548a5bd921c7204a31611aa-- From general-return-3494-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 16:42:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B7215B34 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11270 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11218 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11209 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 16:42:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:42:26 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=lf62ucnZK24HT9MRxrJ2hmAQ7wh0IDWUFl1GUzSE2PqI3h6FW2kLDR2c 6nj2oL0YNodD/e3RnR/RjE03O3nfZBa221cKhCVd8y3CkZotKD/oOki+O HgFbvdtJboS8WfD; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305218546; x=1336754546; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pRbLfifJeupCSoErF03Csy2MMz4Rv7Vkoq25ucmP3oE=; b=rXw29tY0FwKJem5LKs453KRozGpUtLe7+NnVlzYPt2XB8F+Betq5l8/e iq2w76HeIBlMvKqok0YIekeRCElyxzcUMlFl8xKNd1kAQKAPqMbdoAocD qmlzynq0f71+y4E; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,359,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23121408" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:45:41 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMDv3EIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSImxGA//+PqQCAAMSEgIAAedIA Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:45:41 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <143F15C7163C4A46BF2FAFA4AC9713C6@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, given the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve as well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to do than it is to tie the written specifications. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: >While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is >"compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is >meant >by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like the > IEEE POSIX specifications. > >For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >specifies >all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. It >clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >support, >and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use at >one's own risk. > >Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and the >specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the code >is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine corner >cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs is >not >specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >into a >library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what is >then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >returns? > >Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail >such >things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro >spaces, >but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. > >Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the users >of >Hadoop. It provides them > (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs > (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from vendor >lock-in. > >Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the HCK >itself will be buggy initially). > > >On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >> wrote: > >> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under ASL >> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK testsuite." >> >> - milind >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >> >> >This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need to >> >get ahead of this. >> > >> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apache >> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >> > >> >--- >> >E14 - typing on glass >> > >> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >> >> >> >> >>=20 >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D >> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >> >> >> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >> >> >> >> >>=20 >>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_ >>>>1 >> . >> >>pdf >> >> >> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is >>an >> >> improvement. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >> >> >> >> >> >> Licensing >> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>this, >> >> >> >> Naming >> >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>opinions. >> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>XYZ" >> >> >> >> Compatibility >> >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> >> Source tree, >> >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and >> >> future tests pass >> >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> >> compatibility testing >> >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >> >> >> >> Certification >> >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >> >>"Certified" >> >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>impossible >> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>suites >> >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> >> mean by this >> >> >> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>module >> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >> >> >> >> From general-return-3495-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 16:45:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C19B52BB for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17353 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:45:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17297 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:45:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17289 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 16:45:49 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:45:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [172.16.37.77]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:45:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4DCBA6F5.90006@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:45:48 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCBA6F5.90006@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 12, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > I think Sun NFS might be a good example of similar defacto standard, = or MS SMB -it is up to others to show they are compatible with what is = effective the reference implementation. Being closed source, there is no = option for anyone to include SunOS NFS or MS SMB in their products -the = issue of "how much of SunOS NFS to include before you have to stop = calling it that" never arose. SMB and FAT are better examples given how much of NFS and = associated protocols are actually defined in RFC's (1094 being the first = one). :) FAT compatibility between devices is notoriously bad if you go = beyond simple files.= From general-return-3496-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:02:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5BDE5731 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61966 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:02:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61921 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61912 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:02:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:02:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:02:26 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2438587bwz.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mygstrN+jW6nhWpepYhx+TJjq5scZ24+arJNtAwrCNI=; b=gJFdXlLSskAaunZtQLxdnNp9shmkleyvIkVnYroNXPymUn7hHZ3hA4WmI5S8Brybed inAlSOzkMzTwTnwu/tEA/GqUik06dlXPV7P3KfIW3nHJqfsJulb0r4YBlD6FEcwClZcg 7ltckYjjvFP2BxRXwSpRczzG2ZLxAqTwA7qcw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e0CHS50wzsqfyY6GLHJapoYJs11vy40CyTkrGCj+pfain0dnyC0JbDh2lqUZcdImhv oPcQCnbAI/akbPV+ce4AcILyjhw0iPGJZ4bHCPWSs1R5rfEsl1JHsFewcPemACYOeayK iT7Cm+HcyaPmWrPoLg8InKgIdpXdzOMYei3G0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.41.2 with SMTP id m2mr525127bke.54.1305223325398; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.83.196 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:02:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will try to determine a location nearby the buzz, make a reservation and post to the appropriate lists. Bernd On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 17:44, Ted Dunning wrote: > I will be there Monday-Thursday. > > Monday sounds good for food and beverages. > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> I'll be there, but only for the conference on Monday and Tuesday. >> >> Doug >> >> On 05/11/2011 12:31 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:08, Steve Loughran wrot= e: >> >> On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: >> >>> >> >>> If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. >> >>> >> >>> http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ >> >>> >> >> >> >> 1. I'm going to be there >> > >> > 1.1. >> > me too, but only for the conference on Mon + Tue. >> > Who's available for a Hadoop/Apache/etc food + beverages on Monday >> evening? >> > >> > =A0 Bernd >> > From general-return-3497-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:13:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46C7C551F for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85171 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85108 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85100 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:13:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:13:24 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2102412vws.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.69 with SMTP id io5mr724847vdb.94.1305223983045; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:13:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 11:12:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:12:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a9f1dc9c1104a3182383 --bcaec548a9f1dc9c1104a3182383 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Actually, I just heard from Isabel that there will be a Buzzwords barbecue that evening. Should we all just meet there and then adjourn for beers after dinner? On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > I will try to determine a location nearby the buzz, make a reservation > and post to the appropriate lists. > > Bernd > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 17:44, Ted Dunning wrote: > > I will be there Monday-Thursday. > > > > Monday sounds good for food and beverages. > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Doug Cutting > wrote: > > > >> I'll be there, but only for the conference on Monday and Tuesday. > >> > >> Doug > >> > >> On 05/11/2011 12:31 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:08, Steve Loughran > wrote: > >> >> On 11/05/2011 00:53, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> If so.. I'll be there.. let's catch up. > >> >>> > >> >>> http://www.berlinbuzzwords.de/ > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> 1. I'm going to be there > >> > > >> > 1.1. > >> > me too, but only for the conference on Mon + Tue. > >> > Who's available for a Hadoop/Apache/etc food + beverages on Monday > >> evening? > >> > > >> > Bernd > >> > > > --bcaec548a9f1dc9c1104a3182383-- From general-return-3498-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:48:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 825E45513 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24832 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:48:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24785 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:48:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24777 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:48:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:48:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:48:41 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2579255bwz.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hrzdmYkGm0CF8TKAeg6lvX/jeb1GG0cFa0TbmvLCNUY=; b=e/It02Yd/qa1o99xooiLC18k9F6fS3WA91TWFI035/3K1Dop0ycelYNm5GLcXJuUmx /REl1SIuqkXrd8L1BxM1YvB7jna4Fo18svxR+bUhsftZas6J5xPOOcXHBFEMYUn4nzD9 B3tmpQXH0vC/6rpG9odfKsDxQtAm995Tj9pl0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xEtrT+8i4wmGp3GBtstQAEQBc0UaZx2Y7rtbNLjg++VaoWDNevsclkoC0zkpO2nB4/ Ky6W8aZoZ4LClVCfRg0myhjBZaszbTcGPQf6GXYC9KnCDzufRJl5IOe3BMhfqPMVkEUc YYs05TtB2/3tNeoi1oIA+tryPktZiYVbzAukU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.49.138 with SMTP id v10mr641947bkf.108.1305229700829; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.83.196 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCA520D.70405@apache.org> <4DCBA4B3.2070704@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:48:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OT: anyone else going to berlin buzzwords? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:12, Ted Dunning wrote: > Actually, I just heard from Isabel that there will be a Buzzwords barbecue > that evening. Sorry about that, I checked the programme and pinged Isabel to make sure we don't get in conflict with the conf. And I definitively don't want to miss that so... > > Should we all just meet there and then adjourn for beers after dinner? ... +1 Bernd From general-return-3499-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 21:40:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0797C5BDA for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75260 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 21:40:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75207 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 21:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75199 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 21:40:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:40:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:40:49 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2721226bwz.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:40:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.136.217 with SMTP id s25mr698544bkt.13.1305236428872; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.37.204 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:40:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Apache Hadoop Hackathon: 5/18 in Palo Alto and San Francisco From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd8d2b0dd8a04a31b09ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cd8d2b0dd8a04a31b09ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, Thanks to everyone who came out for the Apache Hadoop Hackathon yesterday in Palo Alto and San Francisco. We had 35 people sign up from a great cross section of companies: Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, Apple, Twitter, Foursquare, AOL, Ngmoco, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, Conviva, and more. We had committers from the HBase, Hive, Pig, and Oozie projects ensuring their projects work with the upcoming 0.22 release, and a number of folks got their first patches up. The 0.22 branch is now being built by Jenkins and we're in good shape to get a release candidate up soon. We had so much fun that we're going to do it again! Join us next Wednesday, May 18th, in either San Francisco or Palo Alto, and help us continue the march to get feature development back on trunk. We'll have a special guest in Palo Alto: Nigel Daley, Apache Hadoop PMC member and the release manager for the 0.22 release. If you're a sysadmin or devops person and want to help us build and test Apache Hadoop, this Hackathon will be a great chance to learn about how it's done. Of course we'd also love to have developers looking to get their first patches into Hadoop as well. Sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com and we'll see you Wednesday. Regards, Jeff p.s. if you're looking to prepare for the Hackathon, check out the issues tagged "newbie" at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=labels+%3D+newbie . --0015175cd8d2b0dd8a04a31b09ec-- From general-return-3500-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 22:27:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 177F45EED for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17143 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 22:27:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17084 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 22:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17076 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 22:27:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:27:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:27:18 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so1298716pve.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.57.235 with SMTP id l11mr939135pbq.478.1305239216067; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:26:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:26:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <6407C0E3-934F-4C9D-9103-C738F6C1AED7@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:26:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N7kw19DYEd9bq0SdDVD8DOVuLRQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TCK (or JCK initially) was done as a tool to basically compare Java Lang specs with a particular implementation including but not limited to an extensive suite of say compiler tests. So I assume before we can embark on any sort of HCK suite some formal specs would have to be defined. It's rather hard to say that implementation X is(not) compatible with Apache Hadoop for the lack of API and spec level definition of what really comprise such an animal. As was mentioned someplace else in the thread there's certain effort happening to document DFS, MR, and Avro APIs. Seems like a very good start for Hadoop specs at large. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 16:20, Aaron Kimball wrote: > What does it mean to "implement" those interfaces? I'm +1 for a TCK-based > definition. In addition to statically implementing a set of interfaces, e= ach > interface also implicitly includes a set of acceptable inputs and predict= ed > outputs (or ranges of outputs) for those inputs. > > - Aaron > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jacob R Rideout wrote: > >> What about defining compatibility as fully implementing all the >> public-stable annotated interfaces for a particular release? >> >> Jacob Rideout >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> > For apache (httpd I'm assuming you mean). we define compatibility as >> adherence to the set of RFC's that define the HTTP protocol. >> > >> > I'm no expert in this (Roy is though), but we could attempt to do >> something similar when it comes to HDFS/Map-Reduce protocols. I'm not su= re >> what benefit there would be to going to a RFC, as opposed to documenting= the >> API on our site. >> > >> > >> > On May 12, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> > >> >> This is a really interesting topic! =A0I completely agree that we nee= d to >> get ahead of this. >> >> >> >> I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apac= he >> projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> E14 - typing on glass >> >> >> >> On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> >>> Hadoop Compatibility: >> >>> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4= D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >> >>> >> >>> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1= .pdf >> >>> >> >>> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even thoug= h >> >>> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> >>> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> >>> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is= an >> >>> improvement. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> >>> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Licensing >> >>> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> >>> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> >>> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of thi= s, >> >>> >> >>> Naming >> >>> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinion= s. >> >>> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> >>> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> >>> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> >>> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> >>> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> >>> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XY= Z" >> >>> >> >>> Compatibility >> >>> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> >>> Source tree, >> >>> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> >>> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> >>> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >> >>> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current an= d >> >>> future tests pass >> >>> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> >>> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> >>> compatibility testing >> >>> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> >>> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> >>> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> >>> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design")= . >> >>> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> >>> bugreps to make them more formal. >> >>> >> >>> Certification >> >>> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >> "Certified" >> >>> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossibl= e >> >>> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> >>> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> >>> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >> suites >> >>> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> >>> mean by this >> >>> >> >>> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> >>> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test mod= ule >> >>> that can be used to test real deployments. >> >>> >> > >> > >> > From general-return-3501-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 22:30:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 722D75296 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23230 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 22:30:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23171 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 22:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23163 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 22:30:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:30:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-px0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:30:41 +0000 Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so1686818pxi.2 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.37.36 with SMTP id v4mr1098569pbj.76.1305239420037; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:30:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:30:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:30:00 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9kIhJTaHuYcKfOZPDk3CbMWkt-U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:45, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, given > the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve as I would actually expand it to 'functional and system tests' because latter are capable of validating inter-component iterations not coverable by functional tests. Cos > well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to do > than it is to tie the written specifications. > > - milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: > >>While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is >>"compliant", =A0we still need a written specification to define what is >>meant >>by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like th= e >> IEEE POSIX specifications. >> >>For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >>specifies >>all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. It >>clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >>support, >>and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use at >>one's own risk. >> >>Currently we have 2 sets of API =A0in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and = the >>specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the cod= e >>is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine corner >>cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs is >>not >>specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >>implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >>application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >>into a >>library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what is >>then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >>returns? >> >>Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail >>such >>things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and =A0Avro >>spaces, >>but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >> >>Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the users >>of >>Hadoop. It provides them >> =A0 (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs >> =A0 (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from vend= or >>lock-in. >> >>Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the HC= K >>itself will be buggy initially). >> >> >>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>>> wrote: >> >>> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >>> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under AS= L >>> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK testsuite.= " >>> >>> - milind >>> -- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" wrote: >>> >>> >This is a really interesting topic! =A0I completely agree that we need= to >>> >get ahead of this. >>> > >>> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other apach= e >>> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>> > >>> >--- >>> >E14 - typing on glass >>> > >>> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >>> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4= D >>> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>> >> >>> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final= _ >>>>>1 >>> . >>> >>pdf >>> >> >>> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even thoug= h >>> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >>> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >>> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is >>>an >>> >> improvement. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Licensing >>> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >>> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>this, >>> >> >>> >> Naming >>> >> =A0-this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>opinions. >>> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >>> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>> >> =A0-I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version = of >>> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>>XYZ" >>> >> >>> >> Compatibility >>> >> =A0-the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apach= e >>> >> Source tree, >>> >> =A0-the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes= is >>> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>> >> =A0-the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current an= d >>> >> future tests pass >>> >> =A0-bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >>> >> compatibility testing >>> >> =A0-vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >>> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >>> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design")= . >>> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >>> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>> >> >>> >> Certification >>> >> =A0-I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>> >>"Certified" >>> >> =A0-As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>impossible >>> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>> >> =A0-It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative= as >>> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>>suites >>> >> =A0-And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what t= hey >>> >> mean by this >>> >> >>> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >>> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>module >>> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>> >> >>> >>> > > From general-return-3502-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 03:34:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE181499B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59274 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 03:34:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59127 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 03:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59118 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 03:34:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:34:36 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=ihr9hJWhJZ74DBwgFQctINTcjFKwnloOIdtiM8DuuL9rH3onMPZ7GjCt WXEd6L3kjYPSkD6IYaEk1ltRlHjycwnInPPt6wlBgZ3UPpANhVyQUwRlj i6SIk6y1XW3bEKq; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305257675; x=1336793675; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=q/ZZnOecBVpEy5URypeSzRn2UzbDBEEYvMzdwhfkZbg=; b=Ii1GDeldo29DgClPJ0L1otukVIaB//7f8smPRsiu7QDja+QKLYcyC6oj xOzrsWX91+n+ajgPgFE3J5ZnPjk8YSOXd1GrepSD1WAF7tp8mefN6WtVR +Mad92C9oARjUS6; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23147751" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:37:50 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMEPOnIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSKG1eA Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 03:37:49 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6C27115C4549904298D782B8530DB158@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The problem with (only) specs is that they are written in natural language, and subject to human interpretation, and since humans are bad at natural language interpretation, this gives rise to something called standards bodies and lawyers, and that has never been good for anyone in the past ;-) Now consider this scenario: $ bin/hadoop jar hck-0.20.2.jar --config ... Bunch of output ... Result: Tests run: 1000, Successful: 999 Failed: 1 This is much easier to interpret, even for humans. The intention of formally defining compatibility is so that the programs written for Apache Hadoop run unmodified for other open-source / closed-source systems that claim to be "Apache Hadoop Compatible". Unless it can be verified easily, the compatibility definition has no meaning. So, standards that are only documented are useless. By the way, one should also define "Apache Hadoop Source Compatible", and "Apache Hadoop Binary Compatible", depending on whether one recompiles src/hck/**.java and rebuilds hck.jar or not. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 3:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >TCK (or JCK initially) was done as a tool to basically compare Java >Lang specs with a particular implementation including but not limited >to an extensive suite of say compiler tests. > >So I assume before we can embark on any sort of HCK suite some formal >specs would have to be defined. It's rather hard to say that >implementation X is(not) compatible with Apache Hadoop for the lack of >API and spec level definition of what really comprise such an animal. > >As was mentioned someplace else in the thread there's certain effort >happening to document DFS, MR, and Avro APIs. Seems like a very good >start for Hadoop specs at large. >-- > Take care, >Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 16:20, Aaron Kimball wrote: >> What does it mean to "implement" those interfaces? I'm +1 for a >>TCK-based >> definition. In addition to statically implementing a set of interfaces, >>each >> interface also implicitly includes a set of acceptable inputs and >>predicted >> outputs (or ranges of outputs) for those inputs. >> >> - Aaron >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Jacob R Rideout >>wrote: >> >>> What about defining compatibility as fully implementing all the >>> public-stable annotated interfaces for a particular release? >>> >>> Jacob Rideout >>> >>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ian Holsman >>>wrote: >>> > For apache (httpd I'm assuming you mean). we define compatibility as >>> adherence to the set of RFC's that define the HTTP protocol. >>> > >>> > I'm no expert in this (Roy is though), but we could attempt to do >>> something similar when it comes to HDFS/Map-Reduce protocols. I'm not >>>sure >>> what benefit there would be to going to a RFC, as opposed to >>>documenting the >>> API on our site. >>> > >>> > >>> > On May 12, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> > >>> >> This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we >>>need to >>> get ahead of this. >>> >> >>> >> I would be really interested in learning of any experience other >>>apache >>> projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>> >> >>> >> --- >>> >> E14 - typing on glass >>> >> >>> >> On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >>> >>> Hadoop Compatibility: >>> >>> >>>=20 >>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4 >>>D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>> >>> >>> >>> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>=20 >>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1 >>>.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even >>>though >>> >>> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that >>>both >>> >>> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without >>>defining >>> >>> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it >>>is an >>> >>> improvement. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>> >>> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Licensing >>> >>> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>> >>> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >>> >>> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>this, >>> >>> >>> >>> Naming >>> >>> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>opinions. >>> >>> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and >>>it's >>> >>> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>> >>> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >>> >>> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>> >>> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>> >>> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>>XYZ" >>> >>> >>> >>> Compatibility >>> >>> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >>> >>> Source tree, >>> >>> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes >>>is >>> >>> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>> >>> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>> >>> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current >>>and >>> >>> future tests pass >>> >>> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>> >>> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >>> >>> compatibility testing >>> >>> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>> >>> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but >>>cannot >>> >>> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >>> >>> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by >>>design"). >>> >>> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >>> >>> bugreps to make them more formal. >>> >>> >>> >>> Certification >>> >>> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>> "Certified" >>> >>> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>impossible >>> >>> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>> >>> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative >>>as >>> >>> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>> suites >>> >>> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what >>>they >>> >>> mean by this >>> >>> >>> >>> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >>> >>> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>module >>> >>> that can be used to test real deployments. >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> >> From general-return-3503-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 03:37:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A904549FA for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61886 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 03:37:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61841 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 03:37:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61833 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 03:37:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:37:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:37:30 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=tjs713dLyka8YNkeSTjtKvr5cHLH0ySCina9kODTx82WeVdQ9diH1x2G 76d6f5BJtzbZ3wjV1vrS84hhtqP+Qd6uEigSaQkYt2/bfBGbW36KLkCLk zP1zS1vbi7cscWX; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305257850; x=1336793850; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ag5AkGY4reBwm6Yr333odYmT7RQU5cWGPJlnyHIwQXs=; b=bYXLChJCapZ4ObhqOQA8qxkg0FeToOFheNzBItSLVmwn0hmawGcPVG5F 0ikuuL88dkYMnhu4YllbRhN7uyHAvGjAnonN8B/QoZdTSXFuvoRpeSQVN 4Crm9YVOcvDEQ0g; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23147791" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:40:46 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMDv3EIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSImxGA//+PqQCAAMSEgIAAedIAgADWjwD//+B3AA== Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 03:40:46 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9A8C926288334646A358E8450C86792B@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cos, Can you give me an example of a "system test" that is not a functional test ? My assumption was that the functionality being tested is specific to a component, and that inter-component interactions (that's what you meant, right?) would be taken care by the public interface and semantics of a component API. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 3:30 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:45, Milind Bhandarkar > wrote: >> HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, >>given >> the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve as > >I would actually expand it to 'functional and system tests' because >latter are capable of validating inter-component iterations not >coverable by functional tests. > >Cos > >> well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to do >> than it is to tie the written specifications. >> >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: >> >>>While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is >>>"compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is >>>meant >>>by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like >>>the >>> IEEE POSIX specifications. >>> >>>For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >>>specifies >>>all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. It >>>clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >>>support, >>>and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use at >>>one's own risk. >>> >>>Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and >>>the >>>specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the >>>code >>>is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine >>>corner >>>cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs is >>>not >>>specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >>>implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >>>application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >>>into a >>>library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what >>>is >>>then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >>>returns? >>> >>>Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail >>>such >>>things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro >>>spaces, >>>but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >>> >>>Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the users >>>of >>>Hadoop. It provides them >>> (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs >>> (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from >>>vendor >>>lock-in. >>> >>>Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the >>>HCK >>>itself will be buggy initially). >>> >>> >>>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >>>> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under >>>>ASL >>>> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK >>>>testsuite." >>>> >>>> - milind >>>> -- >>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we need >>>>to >>>> >get ahead of this. >>>> > >>>> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other >>>>apache >>>> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>>> > >>>> >--- >>>> >E14 - typing on glass >>>> > >>>> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>>wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >>>> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C >>>>4D >>>> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>>> >> >>>> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Fina >>>>>>l_ >>>>>>1 >>>> . >>>> >>pdf >>>> >> >>>> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even >>>>though >>>> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that >>>>both >>>> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without >>>>defining >>>> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it >>>>is >>>>an >>>> >> improvement. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>>> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Licensing >>>> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >>>> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>>this, >>>> >> >>>> >> Naming >>>> >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>>opinions. >>>> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and >>>>it's >>>> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>>> >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version >>>>of >>>> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>>> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>>> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>>>XYZ" >>>> >> >>>> >> Compatibility >>>> >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >>>> >> Source tree, >>>> >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes >>>>is >>>> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>>> >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>>> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current >>>>and >>>> >> future tests pass >>>> >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>>> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >>>> >> compatibility testing >>>> >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>>> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but >>>>cannot >>>> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >>>> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by >>>>design"). >>>> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >>>> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>>> >> >>>> >> Certification >>>> >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>>> >>"Certified" >>>> >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>>impossible >>>> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>>> >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative >>>>as >>>> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>>>suites >>>> >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what >>>>they >>>> >> mean by this >>>> >> >>>> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >>>> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>>module >>>> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> From general-return-3504-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 04:06:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FEC34788 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81174 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 04:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81090 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 04:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81078 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 04:06:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:06:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:06:21 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so2557502vxa.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.69 with SMTP id io5mr1371632vdb.94.1305259560049; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:06:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:05:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:05:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a9f16a9cdf04a3206c74 --bcaec548a9f16a9cdf04a3206c74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Did anybody propose natural language only specifications? On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > The problem with (only) specs is that they are written in natural > language, and subject to human interpretation, > --bcaec548a9f16a9cdf04a3206c74-- From general-return-3505-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 04:49:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49C754B66 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12157 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 04:49:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12119 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 04:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12111 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 04:49:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:49:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 04:49:08 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=rnqw7eRXfyLdHXj2sS72eelL381jlBsnXXC1WtCbGxHAJjzx8bYQhAU9 c7+R7a7J58O2Ksw5A344f1JeWg3+Y+iWONQ0b3M7GKxW1vx2lI3ndte+B 3/kCzDFCrgcwkfh; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305262148; x=1336798148; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=eVXy9Lbp5iPjpwGm3KJsReLQUTzq4lGb2zGVGBN6gyM=; b=hfym8Eb/8AYWSoW4MXQbdkFM48ZFaaJML9KmXc8k/UgelUeylcghUvkh xhzmMOzTgDPA5ilRrXr49jlY9U4GYAHRwY7H1RjnswMWD/gyOXOneKWqb ILoGas8uqekwTR2; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23148751" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:52:23 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMEPOnIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSKG1eAgAB+JQD//5axgA== Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 04:52:23 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9C7DFA44E173F1489918182DF0B03FD3@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I may have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them were in English, which is characterized as a natural language. But then, if you are proposing a specification in a non-natural-language, isn't that called a test suite ? Or is there a middle ground ? - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 9:05 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >Did anybody propose natural language only specifications? > >On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >> wrote: > >> The problem with (only) specs is that they are written in natural >> language, and subject to human interpretation, >> From general-return-3506-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 05:06:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91F2F42AB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20483 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 05:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20323 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 05:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20315 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 05:06:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:06:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:06:32 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c47.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.47]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4D55v0c094242 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:05:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305263158; bh=1z/vHT4/lHSjffGhTvnc6UbANmEBMm3c75nmeg20jOs=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=xduOpalmKQ0LWG1ctNUev8SGRd1x2U7yWr+/jw0R3FshuVMgFNEM6gdtD/AJ3rTVn sl3byinB9O/9gYpMursDi43MKmiGAA/k1ejFitbOvOMfrQQZis1YKcxtX1LJhROtzC qpiXEE4KaqLSaaYVdi16nqa8XsZ1yhGq2D4C71YI= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <4DCBA93E.2050005@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:05:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <205D1C0D-975B-4497-AAF2-F64684665241@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4DCBA93E.2050005@apache.org> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) label: print "+1"; goto label; I could not agree more with everything you said steve! The Apache = Hadoop project should own the definition of Apache Hadoop. Hadoop is = far from done. The interfaces need to keep evolving to get to a place = where we can be proud of them. I support "vendors" building replacement components for Apache Hadoop = components. That will benefit the community, give folks choices and = challenge us to make Apache Hadoop even better. I think it is critical = that Apache Hadoop remain a living / evolving work that is driven by = those who are willing to contribute their work to it and that the result = of that evolution is the reference implementation that vendors must = match & exceed to play. I'd love to see more effort to add specifications and compatibility = tests to Apache Hadoop. We'll continue to invest in specs and see what = we can do about tests. I encourage folks who wish to demonstrate = compatibility and use the Apache Hadoop trademark with their products to = help contribute such work to Apache Hadoop. We should include these = things with the code under SVN with our normal patch peer review. On May 12, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 12/05/2011 03:26, M. C. Srivas wrote: >> While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation = is >> "compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is = meant >> by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs = like the >> IEEE POSIX specifications. >>=20 >> For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that = specifies >> all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. = It >> clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to = support, >> and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use = at >> one's own risk. >=20 > I have been known to be critical of standards bodies in the past > http://www.waterfall2006.com/loughran.html >=20 > And I've been in them. It is absolutely essential that the Hadoop = stack=20 > doesn't become controlled by a standards body, as then you become=20 > controlled by whoever can afford to send the most people to the=20 > standards events -and make behind the scenes deals with others to get=20= > votes through. >=20 >> Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, = and the >> specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the = code >> is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine = corner >> cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs = is not >> specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >> implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >> application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream = into a >> library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... = what is >> then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >> returns? >>=20 >> Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to = nail such >> things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro = spaces, >> but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >>=20 >> Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the = users of >> Hadoop. It provides them >> (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs# >=20 > +1 >=20 >> (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from = vendor >> lock-in. >=20 > =3D0 >=20 > They won't be hadoop implementations, they will be "something that is=20= > compatible with the Apache Hadoop API as defined in v 0.x of the = Hadoop=20 > compatibility kit". Furthermore, there's the issue of any google = patents=20 > -while google have given Hadoop permission to them, that may not apply=20= > to other things that implement compatible APIs. >=20 > I also think that the Hadoop team need to be the one's who own the=20 > interfaces and tests, define the tests as a functional test suite for=20= > testing Hadoop distributions, and reserve the right to make changes to=20= > the interfaces, semantics and tests as suits the teams needs. The = input=20 > from others -especially related community projects- are important, = but,=20 > to be ruthless, the compatibility issues with things that aren't = really=20 > Apache Hadoop are less important. you choose to reimplement Hadoop, = you=20 > take on the costs of staying current. >=20 >>=20 >> Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since = the HCK >> itself will be buggy initially). >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3507-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 05:39:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BFA7404F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49755 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 05:39:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49711 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 05:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49702 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 05:39:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:39:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 05:38:55 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2617452vws.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.181.99 with SMTP id dv3mr1539359vdc.14.1305265114235; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:38:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 22:38:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a5bd78c4ae04a321b705 --bcaec548a5bd78c4ae04a321b705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would say that an English spec with associated test suite is a middle ground. On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I may > have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them > were in English, which is characterized as a natural language. > > But then, if you are proposing a specification in a non-natural-language, > isn't that called a test suite ? Or is there a middle ground ? > > - milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/12/11 9:05 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > > >Did anybody propose natural language only specifications? > --bcaec548a5bd78c4ae04a321b705-- From general-return-3508-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 06:12:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5605A4E97 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77038 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:12:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76858 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:12:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76843 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 06:12:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:12:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:12:53 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1507788pzk.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.34.70 with SMTP id x6mr1722393pbi.344.1305267152136; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:12:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:12:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:12:12 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lWP3cJEj_Z_zgTrY65Astl_icKU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The way it has been done in JCK was a specs written in somewhat formalized language and a tool (called testgen, written in Perl if I remember correctly) which was dynamically generating a lot of lang tests. I think this is a middle ground Milind has mentioned. BTW, it was a _huge_ effort: Sun had two team working on TCK - ~40+ people - working for a few years on that thing. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 22:38, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would say that an English spec with associated test suite is a middle > ground. > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar > wrote: > >> Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I ma= y >> have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them >> were in English, which is characterized as a natural language. >> >> But then, if you are proposing a specification in a non-natural-language= , >> isn't that called a test suite ? Or is there a middle ground ? >> >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/12/11 9:05 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >> >> >Did anybody propose natural language only specifications? >> > From general-return-3509-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 06:16:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54E7146F1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95723 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95668 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95660 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 06:16:28 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:16:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.168.237.215]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:16:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 08:16:18 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source software seems like a different task. The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software produced by the ASF. If other folks wish to make factual statements concerning our software, e.g., that their proprietary software passes tests that we've created, that may be fine, but I don't think we should validate those claims by granting certifications to institutions. That ventures outside the mission of the ASF. We are not an accrediting organization. Doug On 05/10/2011 12:29 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache > Hadoop Compatibility: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E > > > I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet > > http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.pdf > > > It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though > the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both > their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining > what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an > improvement. > > > I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own > agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us > > > Licensing > -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and > schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, > > Naming > -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. > The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's > important to make clear it is a derivative work. > -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of > Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate > filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed > "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" > > Compatibility > -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache > Source tree, > -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is > the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. > -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop release > is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and future > tests pass > -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of > community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the > compatibility testing > -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as > compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot > claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the > tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). > Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" > bugreps to make them more formal. > > Certification > -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say "Certified" > -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible > for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. > -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as > "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites > -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they > mean by this > > This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there > -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module > that can be used to test real deployments. > From general-return-3510-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 06:25:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F8454A7C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3474 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:25:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3017 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3009 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 06:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:25:33 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so1487012pve.35 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.57.235 with SMTP id l11mr1559473pbq.478.1305267911048; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:25:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:24:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:24:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y5YHFWFgZb22fXvUi-G9rRnipfI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:40, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Cos, > > Can you give me an example of a "system test" that is not a functional > test ? My assumption was that the functionality being tested is specific > to a component, and that inter-component interactions (that's what you > meant, right?) would be taken care by the public interface and semantics > of a component API. Milind, kinda... However, to exercise inter-component interactions via component APIs one needs to have tests which are beyond functional or component realm (e.g. system). At some point I was part of a team working on integration validation framework for Hadoop (FIT) which was addressing inter-component interaction validations essentially guaranteeing their compatibility. Components being Hadoop, Pig, Oozie, etc. - thus massaging the whole stack of application and covering a lot of use cases. Having a framework like this and a set of test cases available for Hadoop community is a great benefit because one can quickly make sure that a Hadoop stack built from a set of components is working property. Another use case is to run the same set of tests - versioned separately from the product itself - against previous and a next release validating their compatibility at the functional level (sorta what you have mentioned). This doesn't by the way deploy if we'd choose to work on HCK or not, however HCK might be eventually based on top of such a framework. Cos > - milind > > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/12/11 3:30 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:45, Milind Bhandarkar >> wrote: >>> HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, >>>given >>> the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve as >> >>I would actually expand it to 'functional and system tests' because >>latter are capable of validating inter-component iterations not >>coverable by functional tests. >> >>Cos >> >>> well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to d= o >>> than it is to tie the written specifications. >>> >>> - milind >>> >>> -- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>> +1-650-776-3167 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: >>> >>>>While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is >>>>"compliant", =A0we still need a written specification to define what is >>>>meant >>>>by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like >>>>the >>>> IEEE POSIX specifications. >>>> >>>>For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >>>>specifies >>>>all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. I= t >>>>clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >>>>support, >>>>and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use a= t >>>>one's own risk. >>>> >>>>Currently we have 2 sets of API =A0in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, an= d >>>>the >>>>specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the >>>>code >>>>is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine >>>>corner >>>>cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs i= s >>>>not >>>>specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >>>>implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >>>>application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >>>>into a >>>>library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what >>>>is >>>>then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >>>>returns? >>>> >>>>Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail >>>>such >>>>things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and =A0Avro >>>>spaces, >>>>but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >>>> >>>>Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the user= s >>>>of >>>>Hadoop. It provides them >>>> =A0 (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs >>>> =A0 (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from >>>>vendor >>>>lock-in. >>>> >>>>Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the >>>>HCK >>>>itself will be buggy initially). >>>> >>>> >>>>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >>>>> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under >>>>>ASL >>>>> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK >>>>>testsuite." >>>>> >>>>> - milind >>>>> -- >>>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >This is a really interesting topic! =A0I completely agree that we ne= ed >>>>>to >>>>> >get ahead of this. >>>>> > >>>>> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other >>>>>apache >>>>> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>>>> > >>>>> >--- >>>>> >E14 - typing on glass >>>>> > >>>>> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>>>wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apach= e >>>>> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3= C >>>>>4D >>>>> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Fin= a >>>>>>>l_ >>>>>>>1 >>>>> . >>>>> >>pdf >>>>> >> >>>>> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even >>>>>though >>>>> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that >>>>>both >>>>> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without >>>>>defining >>>>> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it >>>>>is >>>>>an >>>>> >> improvement. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>>>> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Licensing >>>>> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>>>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>>> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems an= d >>>>> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>>>this, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Naming >>>>> >> =A0-this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>>>opinions. >>>>> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and >>>>>it's >>>>> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>>>> >> =A0-I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Versio= n >>>>>of >>>>> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>>>> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>>>> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>>>>XYZ" >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Compatibility >>>>> >> =A0-the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apa= che >>>>> >> Source tree, >>>>> >> =A0-the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and class= es >>>>>is >>>>> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>>>> >> =A0-the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>>>> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current >>>>>and >>>>> >> future tests pass >>>>> >> =A0-bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>>>> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >>>>> >> compatibility testing >>>>> >> =A0-vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>>>> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but >>>>>cannot >>>>> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes th= e >>>>> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by >>>>>design"). >>>>> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >>>>> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Certification >>>>> >> =A0-I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>>>> >>"Certified" >>>>> >> =A0-As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>>>impossible >>>>> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>>>> >> =A0-It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivati= ve >>>>>as >>>>> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>>>>suites >>>>> >> =A0-And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what >>>>>they >>>>> >> mean by this >>>>> >> >>>>> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out ther= e >>>>> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>>>module >>>>> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > From general-return-3511-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 06:54:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 919144AB7 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49558 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:54:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49386 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 06:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49377 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 06:54:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:54:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:54:02 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=eystJ4GMvwaebeJcUJI5+ksaXbWjXR7eytonowpQPGgcofK3TYCUc453 iLBK2TW/EN8RP1SlKLWNc/TVP3jMQrP69xHsBXxhX9000tm58fDTrVHbh bwgc4eisBYtFDFY; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305269642; x=1336805642; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4lfbstlA1TlzQaACldpUopg/YTRA/dj7NgZD2X0huSg=; b=IDVtdRzIEdt3q8k7aOBYr+7TUx8cxPe9Xug915Mag4kXjIUDO0mC/sSY oZW4bisrcdxMO55fjy/k8Et3JXVUKg1FNnMtkXAGTEN2mA1wz+VYgS1+3 KVtH6ym7DTjGXxQ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23150739" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:57:17 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMEPOnIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSKG1eAgAB+JQD//5axgIAAgywA//+fuYA= Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 06:57:17 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <92CD4637F8D7924C9C1E8F7AE5B0841E@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sure. As I said before, they are not mutually exclusive. Just stating my experience that specs without a test suite are of no use. If I were to prioritize, I would give priority to a TCK over natural-language specs. That's all. So far, I have seen many replacements for HDFS as InputFormat and OutputFormat that reads from or writes to different data sources and syncs only. It is easily imaginable to have a pluggable app managers and resource manager after MR-279 (other than local, which is part of Apache Hadoop, but not "compatible", think distributed cache). So, we would need a spec and a test suite per component (I.e. App manager, resource manager, current scheduler, replication target chooser, authentication, authorization) now. If the binary protocols were to be crystallized, I can imagine others implementing only the datanode, or a task tracker. So we would need protocol-level compatibility suite for individual daemons as well. I agree with one of the statements that Steve L made, that "Hadoop has an enviable problem of too much activity." If one follows the activities in commercial world, open source, academic and industry-sponsored R&D, one quickly realizes that writing RFCs for all the above components and fixing them without versioning is cumbersome and difficult optimistically, and near impossible realistically. Also, my experience is that keeping standards documentation for an evolving technology up-to-date with the proper implementation is a pipe-dream at best. A test suite that gets compiled and run every time a new version comes out is within the realm of possibility. Therefore, all I am saying is that, while a POSIX-like spec is a "nice to have", a test-suite that defines compatibility is a must. - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 10:38 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >I would say that an English spec with associated test suite is a middle >ground. > >On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >> wrote: > >> Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I >>may >> have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them >> were in English, which is characterized as a natural language. >> >> But then, if you are proposing a specification in a >>non-natural-language, >> isn't that called a test suite ? Or is there a middle ground ? >> >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/12/11 9:05 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >> >> >Did anybody propose natural language only specifications? >> From general-return-3512-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 07:08:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCFF94393 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77648 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 07:08:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77600 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 07:08:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77592 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 07:08:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:07:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=u72I0W6rAm/JPdDyUv7/Qs7g7YjZGQCXAXLaMyq3t3oMbejFh5A8coLK Xgy8sAjqA4YMNKgZLgh5JzNfwudze9zWhZiJoVwhYqNOvmc7V5gxq0CWu XYHqq4iz+tkWPIJ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305270477; x=1336806477; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=i6XB3LDwOrB9qh7Tf7k2zJAkgBwtDcJj5CyoQAmjKGY=; b=USfbEVfVIj+ir68JlGglF/ayl/t7qT5aXDUgFDh2tw453DFAYgC+WIF1 TW2kKkUQs8k14vpEUe3VftREUykKRO//+t+kt69eTzUrFxReuSKcFfnOu ZgUtpXo4zDMqvub; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23150984" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:11:13 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMDv3EIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSImxGA//+PqQCAAMSEgIAAedIAgADWjwD//+B3AIAApDWA//+WlgA= Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:11:12 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cos, I remember the issues about the "inter-component interactions" at that point when you were part of the Yahoo Hadoop FIT team (I was on the other side of the same floor, remember ? ;-) Things like, "Can Pig take full URIs as input, and so works with viewfs", "Can Local jobtracker still use HDFS as input and output", "Can Oozie use local file system to keep workflows, while the jars were located on hdfs" etc came up often. Each of these issues were component-interaction issues, and were results of making DistributedFileSystem a public class, or some subtle dependency on the semantics of a particular method in an interface, which were not explicit in the syntax. That's an issue with interface-compatibility, and so merely compiling against a particular interface is not a solution. One needs a test-suite. (With annotations in Java, one can impose more semantic restrictions on the interface, that can be automatically checked against at runtime. But is limited to individual methods, or the full class. Code generation using perl or whatever is similar in capability.) - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 11:24 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:40, Milind Bhandarkar > wrote: >> Cos, >> >> Can you give me an example of a "system test" that is not a functional >> test ? My assumption was that the functionality being tested is specific >> to a component, and that inter-component interactions (that's what you >> meant, right?) would be taken care by the public interface and semantics >> of a component API. > >Milind, kinda... However, to exercise inter-component interactions via >component APIs one needs to have tests which are beyond functional or >component realm (e.g. system). At some point I was part of a team >working on integration validation framework for Hadoop (FIT) which was >addressing inter-component interaction validations essentially >guaranteeing their compatibility. Components being Hadoop, Pig, Oozie, >etc. - thus massaging the whole stack of application and covering a >lot of use cases. > >Having a framework like this and a set of test cases available for >Hadoop community is a great benefit because one can quickly make sure >that a Hadoop stack built from a set of components is working >property. Another use case is to run the same set of tests - versioned >separately from the product itself - against previous and a next >release validating their compatibility at the functional level (sorta >what you have mentioned). > >This doesn't by the way deploy if we'd choose to work on HCK or not, >however HCK might be eventually based on top of such a framework. > >Cos > >> - milind >> >> -- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> +1-650-776-3167 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/12/11 3:30 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >> >>>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:45, Milind Bhandarkar >>> wrote: >>>> HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, >>>>given >>>> the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve as >>> >>>I would actually expand it to 'functional and system tests' because >>>latter are capable of validating inter-component iterations not >>>coverable by functional tests. >>> >>>Cos >>> >>>> well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to >>>>do >>>> than it is to tie the written specifications. >>>> >>>> - milind >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>> +1-650-776-3167 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: >>>> >>>>>While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation is >>>>>"compliant", we still need a written specification to define what is >>>>>meant >>>>>by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs like >>>>>the >>>>> IEEE POSIX specifications. >>>>> >>>>>For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >>>>>specifies >>>>>all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. >>>>>It >>>>>clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >>>>>support, >>>>>and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use >>>>>at >>>>>one's own risk. >>>>> >>>>>Currently we have 2 sets of API in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, and >>>>>the >>>>>specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the >>>>>code >>>>>is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine >>>>>corner >>>>>cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs >>>>>is >>>>>not >>>>>specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >>>>>implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >>>>>application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >>>>>into a >>>>>library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... what >>>>>is >>>>>then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >>>>>returns? >>>>> >>>>>Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nail >>>>>such >>>>>things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and Avro >>>>>spaces, >>>>>but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >>>>> >>>>>Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the >>>>>users >>>>>of >>>>>Hadoop. It provides them >>>>> (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs >>>>> (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from >>>>>vendor >>>>>lock-in. >>>>> >>>>>Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since the >>>>>HCK >>>>>itself will be buggy initially). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >>>>>> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but under >>>>>>ASL >>>>>> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK >>>>>>testsuite." >>>>>> >>>>>> - milind >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >This is a really interesting topic! I completely agree that we >>>>>>need >>>>>>to >>>>>> >get ahead of this. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other >>>>>>apache >>>>>> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >--- >>>>>> >E14 - typing on glass >>>>>> > >>>>>> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define >>>>>>Apache >>>>>> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/% >>>>>>3C >>>>>>4D >>>>>> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop >>>>>>datasheet >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Fi >>>>>>>>na >>>>>>>>l_ >>>>>>>>1 >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>pdf >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even >>>>>>though >>>>>> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that >>>>>>both >>>>>> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without >>>>>>defining >>>>>> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it >>>>>>is >>>>>>an >>>>>> >> improvement. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >>>>>> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Licensing >>>>>> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>>>>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>>>> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems >>>>>>and >>>>>> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>>>>this, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Naming >>>>>> >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>>>>opinions. >>>>>> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and >>>>>>it's >>>>>> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>>>>> >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version >>>>>>of >>>>>> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>>>>> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>>>>> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >>>>>>XYZ" >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Compatibility >>>>>> >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the >>>>>>Apache >>>>>> >> Source tree, >>>>>> >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and >>>>>>classes >>>>>>is >>>>>> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>>>>> >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >>>>>> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that current >>>>>>and >>>>>> >> future tests pass >>>>>> >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >>>>>> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of >>>>>>the >>>>>> >> compatibility testing >>>>>> >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>>>>> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but >>>>>>cannot >>>>>> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes >>>>>>the >>>>>> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by >>>>>>design"). >>>>>> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by >>>>>>design" >>>>>> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Certification >>>>>> >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>>>>> >>"Certified" >>>>>> >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>>>>impossible >>>>>> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>>>>> >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their >>>>>>derivative >>>>>>as >>>>>> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >>>>>>suites >>>>>> >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what >>>>>>they >>>>>> >> mean by this >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out >>>>>>there >>>>>> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>>>>module >>>>>> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> From general-return-3513-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 07:21:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E2C4B15 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91733 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 07:21:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91011 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 07:21:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90982 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 07:21:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:21:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:21:28 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=dfRgmifZrD59WZLkEO9jqT1TZsZbo7o7Mi883xbPFCIyd87+dgmqp+i0 z4QXoQIPOZACVyNs8yeemBQEiyBP6XLUzegd/3RNwcKI9/n9TtiV7yRWQ lQudEYkeLXO+YpR; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305271288; x=1336807288; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dxuhBEwwJyw76wPIo+Lg6Gp3qLMvmwBT+S2JdgsHTrs=; b=zKAWIk84A7nFMXzXf9vfzHJ/rAEUUeSyGdW70NNf0EX7O+57nh83ARn2 BX0zVYFXehjXh8r6gvITnMSaWy0HuG3IiJK5qBU3uDxYCb/KUvnhC3p15 /cQLXr7BPNWNQtK; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="23151524" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:24:44 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMETVFIB+Y40jJf0ahsOjyQf2X+pSKWjoA Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:24:43 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4CD6C50103C78243AA918CBD64B6F73E@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1. Apache foundation or contributors to Apache should not waste their energy providing such certification. Compatibility claims should be easily verifiable by users of these proprietary systems or independent observers, if a test-suite were readily available to run. >The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software >produced by the ASF. IANAL, but Steve is questioning usage of "Apache Hadoop Compatible" in PR material of commercial software. Is this considered as usage of "The Hadoop mark" ? - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 5/12/11 11:16 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce >open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that >seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source >software seems like a different task. > >The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software >produced by the ASF. If other folks wish to make factual statements >concerning our software, e.g., that their proprietary software passes >tests that we've created, that may be fine, but I don't think we should >validate those claims by granting certifications to institutions. That >ventures outside the mission of the ASF. We are not an accrediting >organization. > >Doug > >On 05/10/2011 12:29 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>=20 >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>=20 >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>=20 >>=20 >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>=20 >>=20 >>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1. >>pdf >>=20 >>=20 >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is an >> improvement. >>=20 >>=20 >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>=20 >>=20 >> Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, >>=20 >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" >>=20 >> Compatibility >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> Source tree, >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop release >> is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and future >> tests pass >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> compatibility testing >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>=20 >> Certification >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>"Certified" >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test suites >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> mean by this >>=20 >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test module >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>=20 From general-return-3514-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 08:53:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 780F842EC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56208 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 08:53:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56163 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 08:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56150 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 08:53:14 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:53:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.169.151.44]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:53:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:53:06 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2011 09:24 AM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > IANAL, but Steve is questioning usage of "Apache Hadoop Compatible" in PR > material of commercial software. Is this considered as usage of "The > Hadoop mark" ? It's a usage. Is it permitted? Let's consider. "EMC Greenplum HD Enterprise Edition - The Enterprise Edition is a 100 percent interface-compatible implementation of the Apache Hadoop stack." The trademark question is whether this creates confusion about what Hadoop means (not acceptable) or whether it's just a statement about Hadoop (acceptable). On one hand, it might be read to say, "EE is Hadoop", which creates confusion, on the other it might be read to say, "EE's API is a superset of Hadoop's API", a statement of fact that may or may not be true. I think the intended reading is the latter, but it should probably be stated more clearly: Hadoop has an API but Hadoop is not its API. Perhaps we should to ask them to clarify this? "EMC Greenplum HD Community Edition - The Community Edition is a 100 percent open source certified and supported version of the Apache Hadoop stack comprising HDFS, MapReduce, Zookeeper, Hive and HBase." Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that this "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is" them. Doug From general-return-3515-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 09:52:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B6D4224 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16019 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:52:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15968 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15960 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 09:52:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:52:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:51:56 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:51:27 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:51:07 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: 'Eric Fiala' , "cdh-user@cloudera.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:49:06 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwP2vzr3MhYPAnJTSu7BVhGQzJBtgBdyqHw Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > From my experience, hadoop loathes swap and you mention that all reduces = and mappers are running (8 total) and from the ganglia screenshot I see tha= t you have a thick crest of that purple swap. I know, it's ugly isn't it :) My understanding is that this is partly due t= o forked processes though. > If we do the math that means [ map.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts ] = + [ reduce.tasks.max * mapred.child.java.opts ] =3D> or [ 4 * 2.5G ] + [ 4= * 2.5G ] is greater than the amount of physical RAM in the machine. > This doesn't account for the base tasktracker and datanode process + OS o= verhead and whatever else may be hoarding resources on the systems. This makes me feel stupid :) Your right, I've just screwed it down, we'll s= ee how it performs now. > I would play with this ratio, either less maps / reduces max - or lower y= our child.java.opts so that when you are fully subscribed you are not using= more resource than the machine can offer. > Also, setting mapred.reduce.slowstart.completed.maps to 1.00 or some ot= her value close to 1 would be one way to guarantee only 4 either maps or re= duces to be running at once and address (albeit in a duct tape like way) th= e oversubscription problem you are seeing (this represents the fractions of= maps that should complete before initiating the reduce phase). This is a new one for me. I get Allen's point that on a multi tenant cluste= r this won't fix the problem, but the default is definitely not a good one.= Starting reduce tasks as soon as map tasks start running is hardly ever us= eful, and just takes up slots that could be used by others. Thanks a bunch for the suggestions! Cheers, Evert On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Evert Lammerts wr= ote: Hi list, I notice that whenever our Hadoop installation is put under a heavy load we= lose one or two (on a total of five) datanodes. This results in IOExceptio= ns, and affects the overall performance of the job being run. Can anybody g= ive me advise or best practices on a different configuration to increase th= e stability? Below I've included the specs of the cluster, the hadoop relat= ed config and an example of when which things go wrong. Any help is very mu= ch appreciated, and if I can provide any other info please let me know. Cheers, Evert =3D=3D What goes wrong, and when =3D=3D See attached a screenshot of Ganglia when the cluster is under load of a si= ngle job. This job: * reads ~1TB from HDFS * writes ~200GB to HDFS * runs 288 Mappers and 35 Reducers When the job runs it takes all available Map and Reduce slots. The system s= tarts swapping and there is a short time interval during which most cores a= re in WAIT. After that the job really starts running. At around half way, o= ne or two datanodes become unreachable and are marked as dead nodes. The am= ount of under-replicated blocks becomes huge. Then some "java.io.IOExceptio= n: Could not obtain block" are thrown in Mappers. The job does manage to fi= nish successfully after around 3.5 hours, but my fear is that when we make = the input much larger - which we want - the system becomes too unstable to = finish the job. Maybe worth mentioning - never know what might help diagnostics. We notice= that memory usage becomes less when we switch our keys from Text to LongWr= itable. Also, the Mappers are done in a fraction of the time. However, this= for some reason results in much more network traffic and makes Reducers ex= tremely slow. We're working on figuring out what causes this. =3D=3D The cluster =3D=3D We have a cluster that consists of 6 Sun Thumpers running Hadoop 0.20.2 on = CentOS 5.5. One of them acts as NN and JT, the other 5 run DN's and TT's. E= ach node has: * 16GB RAM * 32GB swapspace * 4 cores * 11 LVM's of 4 x 500GB disks (2TB in total) for HDFS * non-HDFS stuff on separate disks * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access I realize that this is not a well balanced system, but it's what we had ava= ilable for a prototype environment. We're working on putting together a spe= cification for a much larger production environment. =3D=3D Hadoop config =3D=3D Here some properties that I think might be relevant: __CORE-SITE.XML__ fs.inmemory.size.mb: 200 mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor: 100 mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb: 200 # 1024*1024*4 MB, blocksize of the LVM's io.file.buffer.size: 4194304 __HDFS-SITE.XML__ # 1024*1024*4*32 MB, 32 times the blocksize of the LVM's dfs.block.size: 134217728 # Only 5 DN's, but this shouldn't hurt dfs.namenode.handler.count: 40 # This got rid of the occasional "Could not obtain block"'s dfs.datanode.max.xcievers: 4096 __MAPRED-SITE.XML__ mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum: 4 mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum: 4 mapred.child.java.opts: -Xmx2560m mapreduce.reduce.shuffle.parallelcopies: 20 mapreduce.map.java.opts: -Xmx512m mapreduce.reduce.java.opts: -Xmx512m # Compression codecs are configured and seem to work fine mapred.compress.map.output: true mapred.map.output.compression.codec: com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec From general-return-3516-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 09:57:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F6CC43C2 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25877 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25818 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25810 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 09:57:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:57:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:57:04 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:56:42 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:56:42 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "" , "" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:54:40 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwQANbHLbwnC3EHT6WAQGeZF8GBhABUUebQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Mike, > You really really don't want to do this. > Long story short... It won't work. Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or about hav= ing a separated network for interconnects and external network? What can go= wrong there? > > Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They > should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your > cluster has a single network to worry about. That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a SPOE.= However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. We want = to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact with the c= luster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit their jobs = from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up Hadoop ports f= or the world, is my understanding: if people interact with HDFS they need t= o be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be the argument aga= inst this? Cheers, Evert > > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects > >>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access > > > > Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance > problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. > > > > > > From general-return-3517-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 12:37:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6291E43E9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55555 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 12:37:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55503 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 12:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55495 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 12:37:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:37:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:37:03 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4DC2dnb014017 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:02:39 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 432A44970B51; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 7LaLSDGUpeU90Ul9; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4DCafxf024570; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:41 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:41 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "" , "" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:36:53 -0500 Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwRamh2hWksDMtuRoWpOL9mqoklxQ== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bonded will work but you may not see the performance you would expect. I= f you need >1 GBe, go 10GBe less headache and has even more headroom. Multiple interfaces won't work. Or I should say didn't work in past relea= ses.=20 If you think about it, clients have to connect to each node. So having tw= o interfaces and trying to manage them makes no sense.=20 Add to this trying to manage this in DNS ... Why make more work for yours= elf? Going from memory... It looked like you rDNS had to match you hostnames s= o your internal interfaces had to match hostnames so you had an inverted = network. If you draw out your network topology you end up with a ladder.=20 You would be better off (IMHO) to create a subnet where only your edge se= rvers are dual nic'd. But then if your cluster is for development... Now your PCs can't be used= as clients... Does this make sense? Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 4:57 AM, "Evert Lammerts" wr= ote: > Hi Mike, >=20 >> You really really don't want to do this. >> Long story short... It won't work. >=20 > Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or about= having a separated network for interconnects and external network? What = can go wrong there? >=20 >>=20 >> Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They >> should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your >> cluster has a single network to worry about. >=20 > That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a S= POE. However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. We= want to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact wi= th the cluster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit t= heir jobs from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up Ha= doop ports for the world, is my understanding: if people interact with HD= FS they need to be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be = the argument against this? >=20 > Cheers, > Evert >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>=20 >> Mike Segel >>=20 >> On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>>=20 >>> Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance >> problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3518-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 13:44:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31BC04C05 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 13:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79650 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 13:44:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79605 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 13:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79597 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 13:44:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 13:44:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 13:44:19 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so2903241vxa.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.110.135 with SMTP id ia7mr2042845vdb.294.1305294238058; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:43:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 06:43:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54860726309c704a3287fc4 --bcaec54860726309c704a3287fc4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I thought the word "comprising" meant includes, not is. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > "EMC Greenplum HD Community Edition - The Community Edition is a 100 > percent open source certified and supported version of the Apache Hadoop > stack comprising HDFS, MapReduce, Zookeeper, Hive and HBase." > > Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software > uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that this > "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is" > them. > --bcaec54860726309c704a3287fc4-- From general-return-3519-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 14:42:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A1224200 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3160 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:42:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3106 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3097 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 14:42:00 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:42:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:41:59 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1888006qyk.14 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:41:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.78.22 with SMTP id i22mr1274301qck.33.1305297718371; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.9 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:41:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: What is "Hadoop?" Was: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235429d8f4d467c904a3294eda --00235429d8f4d467c904a3294eda Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own agendas > define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us > I agree completely. As you point out, this week we've had a flood of products calling themselves "Hadoop" or "Distribution of Hadoop" that include only a part of Hadoop. This is will dilute Apache's Hadoop trademark and create consumer confusion. Licensing > -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and > schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of this, > +1 Plugins are usually considered independent works. Note that the Apache license does permit commercial closed-source derivative works. A company could take Hadoop's code, modify it, and sell a binary release as long as they meet the conditions of the Apache license. > Naming > -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their opinions. > The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's > important to make clear it is a derivative work. > -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of Apache > Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate filesystems, MR > engines, etc. Some description of this is needed > "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem XYZ" > The Hadoop name is the primary tool that the project has for minimizing customer confusion. I think we need to create a very clear definition of what can be called Hadoop and what can not. Apache gives the PMCs a fair amount of latitude in picking the policy for their project name and I think we need to do so. Given the large number of so-called Hadoop products that are being released, I believe that we should require "Hadoop" to mean specifically the Apache Hadoop releases (possibly with a few critical security patches). Projects that are derivative works can either be "powered by Apache Hadoop," or "based on Apache Hadoop." What do others think? -- Owen --00235429d8f4d467c904a3294eda-- From general-return-3520-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 14:50:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E782C49FB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29370 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:50:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29177 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29168 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 14:50:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:50:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:50:35 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2997632vws.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ICq4A5MgxF1FimDwlwQFNDlFj8MEwzheCzJdHwtmNYI=; b=lCnKOQwdpFq54L1j+2DnZhcgLhI79ofVegJS+gbRgfQw2Tr2S17SKdS2x3DUSPDJl+ mQmJMU3MZKNb9qU8E8S8/FsrRq+NrN1Kj/RpC430ZcaNS8On0MxoE44oBKZON9D3I5XE 8ditRtwulW0/Ne3LMYXt1zam9O4R/e4gDzrjM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ba9eq+pzOEFexyLQiK1TlbGTijZ4SBAwKUeTd6BrOIDqxnOl4q3+I0nqgKJfHukXE0 HoJNaeXBeSu416p33xw6CVLaYrK3q1pKGXJP0fXQhu8AKQoaLpMnfdiVsnXS4NrhNsKq IIm4Pvo+oEuqS2WZ+LznbrzNXuupXpP777M5I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.76.10 with SMTP id g10mr2141351vdw.252.1305298214241; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.156.170 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.156.170 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071d06662c48f04a3296c4b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3071d06662c48f04a3296c4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, but there's an "is" earlier in the sentence. Doug On May 13, 2011 3:44 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > I thought the word "comprising" meant includes, not is. > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> "EMC Greenplum HD Community Edition - The Community Edition is a 100 >> percent open source certified and supported version of the Apache Hadoop >> stack comprising HDFS, MapReduce, Zookeeper, Hive and HBase." >> >> Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software >> uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at >> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that this >> "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is" >> them. >> --20cf3071d06662c48f04a3296c4b-- From general-return-3521-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 15:20:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 772864D36 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 253 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 15:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 108 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 15:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 100 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 15:20:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:20:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:20:08 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4DFJd7Z057982 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:19:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305299979; bh=wFYvHHcwAnUStGDWyErC8FtPgbVzWFs2aZzQ473CXIU=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=HWWJXGE6Azxv0SM0WZg/KBxRh2cqE9E7JMAI4nTmW5ztw/2XzrUK3N6LDIstVTvc5 +8iCH7plt0D8QTGn3zJ/lCf7lss/kWxW80b17p7KQKmWf59dQwcQ2T5jg4suvNhjvk TbTF7CE6xxylX7wvh9KQ+91JW6ffGa38xIHT9o1Q= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:19:38 -0700 From: Nathan Roberts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 08:19:30 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwRfTDyAeDQKalfQJipUYQWWspNuQAA/aoJ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Key seems to be how one would interpret "version". Replace it with a synony= m like "variant" and this may be the intent. On 5/13/11 9:50 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Yes, but there's an "is" earlier in the sentence. >=20 > Doug > On May 13, 2011 3:44 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >> I thought the word "comprising" meant includes, not is. >>=20 >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Doug Cutting wrote= : >>=20 >>> "EMC Greenplum HD Community Edition - The Community Edition is a 100 >>> percent open source certified and supported version of the Apache Hadoo= p >>> stack comprising HDFS, MapReduce, Zookeeper, Hive and HBase." >>>=20 >>> Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software >>> uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at >>> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that this >>> "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is" >>> them. >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3522-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:28:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99B7A479D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99826 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:28:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99778 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:28:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99770 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:28:45 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:28:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [172.16.37.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:28:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:28:41 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 13, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software > uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that = this > "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is" = them. If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual = Apache release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are = they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? At what point is it not = Apache Hadoop? From general-return-3523-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:33:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1F3B4725 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9768 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:33:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9716 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:33:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9708 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:33:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:00 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4DHWdjL025672 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:39 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C014D442246F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id NJhjIqIDdHc7SKDL for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4DHWcNe021920; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:38 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:38 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:52 -0500 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwRk8D/d408HxkoREGgU8PWykB5Jw== Message-ID: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 My first read was that they used the term Apache Hadoop in reference of A= pache's release. They referenced their release as Hadoop. Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 12:28 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >=20 > On May 13, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> Here "certified" is probably just intended to mean that the software >> uses a "certified" open source license, e.g., listed at >> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/. However they should say that thi= s >> "includes" or "contains" the various Apache products, not that it "is"= them. >=20 > If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache r= elease or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are they all= owed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? At what point is it not Apache Had= oop? >=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3524-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:48:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B55456C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35485 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35437 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35429 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:48:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:18 +0000 Received: by pwi16 with SMTP id 16so1853784pwi.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.3.139 with SMTP id c11mr2505282pbc.277.1305308876070; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:47:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:47:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7js-RwcawQVZPTFGNoEJHLVYySI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:11, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Cos, > > I remember the issues about the "inter-component interactions" at that > point when you were part of the Yahoo Hadoop FIT team (I was on the other > side of the same floor, remember ? ;-) Vaguely ;) Of course I remember. But I prefer not to mentioned any internal technologies developed for private companies after getting lashes for that. > Things like, "Can Pig take full URIs as input, and so works with viewfs", > "Can Local jobtracker still use HDFS as input and output", "Can Oozie use > local file system to keep workflows, while the jars were located on hdfs" > etc came up often. > > Each of these issues were component-interaction issues, and were results > of making DistributedFileSystem a public class, or some subtle dependency > on the semantics of a particular method in an interface, which were not > explicit in the syntax. > > That's an issue with interface-compatibility, and so merely compiling > against a particular interface is not a solution. One needs a test-suite. One needs more than a mere test-suite if experience teaches us anything. FIT and its continuation turns to be a complex program (not only in a sense of computer code) with many moving parts, bells and whistles. One of those was a set of specs actually written in English language. The downside is that someone needs to keep them up to day, translate them into test cases or teach others how to do it, etc. That exactly why TCK was using a test generator and used somewhat formalized spec language. Cos > (With annotations in Java, one can impose more semantic restrictions on > the interface, that can be automatically checked against at runtime. But > is limited to individual methods, or the full class. Code generation usin= g > perl or whatever is similar in capability.) > > - milind > -- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > +1-650-776-3167 > > > > > > > On 5/12/11 11:24 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:40, Milind Bhandarkar >> wrote: >>> Cos, >>> >>> Can you give me an example of a "system test" that is not a functional >>> test ? My assumption was that the functionality being tested is specifi= c >>> to a component, and that inter-component interactions (that's what you >>> meant, right?) would be taken care by the public interface and semantic= s >>> of a component API. >> >>Milind, kinda... However, to exercise inter-component interactions via >>component APIs one needs to have tests which are beyond functional or >>component realm (e.g. system). At some point =A0I was part of a team >>working on integration validation framework for Hadoop (FIT) which was >>addressing inter-component interaction validations essentially >>guaranteeing their compatibility. Components being Hadoop, Pig, Oozie, >>etc. - thus massaging the whole stack of application and covering a >>lot of use cases. >> >>Having a framework like this and a set of test cases available for >>Hadoop community is a great benefit because one can quickly make sure >>that a Hadoop stack built from a set of components is working >>property. Another use case is to run the same set of tests - versioned >>separately from the product itself - against previous and a next >>release validating their compatibility at the functional level (sorta >>what you have mentioned). >> >>This doesn't by the way deploy if we'd choose to work on HCK or not, >>however HCK might be eventually based on top of such a framework. >> >>Cos >> >>> - milind >>> >>> -- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>> +1-650-776-3167 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/12/11 3:30 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:45, Milind Bhandarkar >>>> wrote: >>>>> HCK and written specifications are not mutually exclusive. However, >>>>>given >>>>> the evolving nature of Hadoop APIs, functional tests need to evolve a= s >>>> >>>>I would actually expand it to 'functional and system tests' because >>>>latter are capable of validating inter-component iterations not >>>>coverable by functional tests. >>>> >>>>Cos >>>> >>>>> well, and having them tied to a "current stable" version is easier to >>>>>do >>>>> than it is to tie the written specifications. >>>>> >>>>> - milind >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>>> +1-650-776-3167 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/11/11 7:26 PM, "M. C. Srivas" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>While the HCK is a great idea to check quickly if an implementation i= s >>>>>>"compliant", =A0we still need a written specification to define what = is >>>>>>meant >>>>>>by compliance, something akin to a set of RFC's, or a set of docs lik= e >>>>>>the >>>>>> IEEE POSIX specifications. >>>>>> >>>>>>For example, the POSIX.1c pthreads API has a written document that >>>>>>specifies >>>>>>all the function calls, input params, return values, and error codes. >>>>>>It >>>>>>clearly indicates what any POSIX-complaint threads package needs to >>>>>>support, >>>>>>and what are vendor-specific non-portable extensions that one can use >>>>>>at >>>>>>one's own risk. >>>>>> >>>>>>Currently we have 2 sets of API =A0in the DFS and Map/Reduce layers, = and >>>>>>the >>>>>>specification is extracted only by looking at the code, or (where the >>>>>>code >>>>>>is non-trivial) by writing really bizarre test programs to examine >>>>>>corner >>>>>>cases. Further, the interaction between a mix of the old and new APIs >>>>>>is >>>>>>not >>>>>>specified anywhere. Such specifications are vitally important when >>>>>>implementing libraries like Cascading, Mahout, etc. For example, an >>>>>>application might open a file using the new API, and pass that stream >>>>>>into a >>>>>>library that manipulates the stream using some of the old API ... wha= t >>>>>>is >>>>>>then the expectation of the state of the stream when the library call >>>>>>returns? >>>>>> >>>>>>Sanjay Radia @ Y! already started specifying some the DFS APIs to nai= l >>>>>>such >>>>>>things down. There's similar good effort in the Map/Reduce and =A0Avr= o >>>>>>spaces, >>>>>>but it seems to have stalled somewhat. We should continue it. >>>>>> >>>>>>Doing such specs would be a great service to the community and the >>>>>>users >>>>>>of >>>>>>Hadoop. It provides them >>>>>> =A0 (a) clear-cut docs on how to use the Hadoop APIs >>>>>> =A0 (b) wider choice of Hadoop implementations by freeing them from >>>>>>vendor >>>>>>lock-in. >>>>>> >>>>>>Once we have such specification, the HCK becomes meaningful (since th= e >>>>>>HCK >>>>>>itself will be buggy initially). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it's time to separate out functional tests as a "Hadoop >>>>>>> Compatibility Kit (HCK)", similar to the Sun TCK for Java, but unde= r >>>>>>>ASL >>>>>>> 2.0. Then "certification" would mean "Passes 100% of the HCK >>>>>>>testsuite." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - milind >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Milind Bhandarkar >>>>>>> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/11/11 2:24 PM, "Eric Baldeschwieler" >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >This is a really interesting topic! =A0I completely agree that we >>>>>>>need >>>>>>>to >>>>>>> >get ahead of this. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >I would be really interested in learning of any experience other >>>>>>>apache >>>>>>> >projects, such as apache or tomcat have with these issues. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >--- >>>>>>> >E14 - typing on glass >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >On May 10, 2011, at 6:31 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define >>>>>>>Apache >>>>>>> >> Hadoop Compatibility: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/= % >>>>>>>3C >>>>>>>4D >>>>>>> >>46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop >>>>>>>datasheet >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_F= i >>>>>>>>>na >>>>>>>>>l_ >>>>>>>>>1 >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>pdf >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even >>>>>>>though >>>>>>> >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that >>>>>>>both >>>>>>> >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without >>>>>>>defining >>>>>>> >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that i= t >>>>>>>is >>>>>>>an >>>>>>> >> improvement. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their ow= n >>>>>>> >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Licensing >>>>>>> >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >>>>>>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>>>>> >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems >>>>>>>and >>>>>>> >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >>>>>>>this, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Naming >>>>>>> >> =A0-this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >>>>>>>opinions. >>>>>>> >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and >>>>>>>it's >>>>>>> >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >>>>>>> >> =A0-I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Vers= ion >>>>>>>of >>>>>>> >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >>>>>>> >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >>>>>>> >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesyste= m >>>>>>>XYZ" >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Compatibility >>>>>>> >> =A0-the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the >>>>>>>Apache >>>>>>> >> Source tree, >>>>>>> >> =A0-the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and >>>>>>>classes >>>>>>>is >>>>>>> >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >>>>>>> >> =A0-the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hado= op >>>>>>> >> release is compatible with the expected semantics is that curren= t >>>>>>>and >>>>>>> >> future tests pass >>>>>>> >> =A0-bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations = of >>>>>>> >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> >> compatibility testing >>>>>>> >> =A0-vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >>>>>>> >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but >>>>>>>cannot >>>>>>> >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by >>>>>>>design"). >>>>>>> >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by >>>>>>>design" >>>>>>> >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Certification >>>>>>> >> =A0-I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >>>>>>> >>"Certified" >>>>>>> >> =A0-As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem >>>>>>>impossible >>>>>>> >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >>>>>>> >> =A0-It may be best to state that nobody can certify their >>>>>>>derivative >>>>>>>as >>>>>>> >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current tes= t >>>>>>>suites >>>>>>> >> =A0-And require that anyone who declares compatibility define wh= at >>>>>>>they >>>>>>> >> mean by this >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out >>>>>>>there >>>>>>> >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >>>>>>>module >>>>>>> >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > From general-return-3525-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:15:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D03741F8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94560 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:15:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94513 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:15:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94505 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:15:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:33 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:15:09 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:14:48 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "cdh-user@cloudera.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:14:47 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwRamh2hWksDMtuRoWpOL9mqoklxQARO6Jr Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Mike, Thanks for trying to help out. I had a talk with our networking guys this afternoon. According to them (an= d this is way out of my area of expertise, so excuse any mistakes) multiple= interfaces shouldn't be a problem. We could set up a nameserver to resolve= hostnames to addresses in our private space when the request comes from on= e of the nodes, and route this traffic over a single interface. Any other r= equest can be resolved to an address in the public space, which is bound to= an other interface. In our current setup we're not even resolving hostname= s in our private address space through a nameserver - we do it with an ugly= hack in /etc/hosts. And it seems to work alright. Having said that, our problems are still not completely gone even after adj= usting the maximum allowed RAM for tasks - although things are lots better.= While writing this mail three out of five DN's were marked as dead. There = still is some swapping going on, but the cores are not spending any time in= WAIT, so this shouldn't be the cause of anything. See below a trace from a= dead DN - any thoughts are appreciated! Cheers, Evert 2011-05-13 23:13:27,716 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Received block blk_-9131821326787012529_2915672 src: /192.168.28.211:601= 36 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 382425 2011-05-13 23:13:27,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 java= .io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes 2011-05-13 23:13:27,925 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35139, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001437_0= , offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 6254000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,032 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Received block blk_-9149862728087355005_3793421 src: /192.168.28.210:411= 97 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 245767 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 unfinalized and removed.=20 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: writeBlock blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 received exception java.io.EO= FException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNo= de: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-145= .100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXcei= ver java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(B= lockReceiver.java:270) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:357) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePack= et(BlockReceiver.java:378) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBloc= k(BlockReceiver.java:534) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(Da= taXceiver.java:417) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiv= er.java:122) 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32910, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001443_0= , offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4323000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35138, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001440_0= , offset: 197120, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5573000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,159 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38574, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001444_0= , offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 16939000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,209 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Received block blk_-9123390874940601805_2898225 src: /192.168.28.210:442= 27 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 300441 2011-05-13 23:13:28,217 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42364, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001451_0= , offset: 198656, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5291000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,252 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32930, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436_0= , offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, blockid= : blk_-1800696633107072247_4099834, duration: 5099000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,256 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42363, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001458_0= , offset: 199680, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4945000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,257 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35137, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436_0= , offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4159000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 jav= a.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 unfinalized and removed.=20 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: writeBlock blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 received exception java.io.E= OFException: while trying to read 100 bytes 2011-05-13 23:13:28,259 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNo= de: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-145= .100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXcei= ver java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(B= lockReceiver.java:270) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:357) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePack= et(BlockReceiver.java:378) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBloc= k(BlockReceiver.java:534) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(Da= taXceiver.java:417) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiv= er.java:122) 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38553, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001441_0= , offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, blockid= : blk_-5819719631677148140_4098274, duration: 5625000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38535, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001438_0= , offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, bl= ockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4473000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-145.= 100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020): Exceptio= n writing block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 to mirror 192.168.28.213:5= 0050 java.io.IOException: The stream is closed at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStrea= m.java:108) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.ja= va:65) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:123= ) at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBloc= k(BlockReceiver.java:540) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(Da= taXceiver.java:417) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiv= er.java:122) 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:45484, byt= es: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001432_0= , offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, blockid= : blk_405051931214094755_4098504, duration: 5597000 2011-05-13 23:13:28,273 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Received block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 src: /192.168.28.211:492= 08 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 3033173 2011-05-13 23:13:28,313 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: Received block blk_-9144765354308563975_3310572 src: /192.168.28.211:515= 92 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 242383 ________________________________________ From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 2:36 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: ; Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Bonded will work but you may not see the performance you would expect. If = you need >1 GBe, go 10GBe less headache and has even more headroom. Multiple interfaces won't work. Or I should say didn't work in past release= s. If you think about it, clients have to connect to each node. So having two = interfaces and trying to manage them makes no sense. Add to this trying to manage this in DNS ... Why make more work for yoursel= f? Going from memory... It looked like you rDNS had to match you hostnames so = your internal interfaces had to match hostnames so you had an inverted netw= ork. If you draw out your network topology you end up with a ladder. You would be better off (IMHO) to create a subnet where only your edge serv= ers are dual nic'd. But then if your cluster is for development... Now your PCs can't be used a= s clients... Does this make sense? Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 4:57 AM, "Evert Lammerts" wrot= e: > Hi Mike, > >> You really really don't want to do this. >> Long story short... It won't work. > > Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or about h= aving a separated network for interconnects and external network? What can = go wrong there? > >> >> Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They >> should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your >> cluster has a single network to worry about. > > That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a SPO= E. However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. We wan= t to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact with the= cluster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit their job= s from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up Hadoop ports= for the world, is my understanding: if people interact with HDFS they need= to be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be the argument a= gainst this? > > Cheers, > Evert > >> >> >> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >> >> Mike Segel >> >> On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>> >>> Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance >> problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >>> >>> >>> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is = intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, dis= tribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is str= ictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please= notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of = it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3526-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:56:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15E1447F4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52568 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:55:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52509 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52501 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:55:58 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:55:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.169.178.234]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:55:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:55:51 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache > release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are > they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? No. Those are the two cases we permit. We used to say that it was enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has been reviewed and accepted by the community. Doug From general-return-3527-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:13:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1691D4FBE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65586 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:13:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65527 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65519 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:13:53 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:13:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:13:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:13:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache >> release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are >> they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? >=20 > No. Those are the two cases we permit. We used to say that it was > enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that > committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has = been > reviewed and accepted by the community. So what do we do about companies that release a product that = says "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed = to trunk? From general-return-3528-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:16:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41C8F4363 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68469 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:16:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68417 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:16:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68409 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:16:07 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:16:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.169.178.234]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:16:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:16:00 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/14/2011 12:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > So what do we do about companies that release a product that says "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed to trunk? We yell at them to get those patches into trunk already. This policy was clarified after that product was shipping. Doug From general-return-3529-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:17:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80F304B42 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71209 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:17:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71151 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:17:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71143 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:17:52 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:17:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A7603B9-A6C0-4FC7-8B45-CEF3035244F0@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 13, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/14/2011 12:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> So what do we do about companies that release a product that says = "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed to = trunk? >=20 > We yell at them to get those patches into trunk already. This policy > was clarified after that product was shipping. ... and if those patches are rejected by the community?= From general-return-3530-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:18:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F3924FD6 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73489 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:18:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73428 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:18:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73420 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:18:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:18:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:18:39 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1281839eya.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:18:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr881080eeh.195.1305325097908; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:18:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:18:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache >>> release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are >>> they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? >> >> No. =A0Those are the two cases we permit. =A0We used to say that it was >> enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that >> committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has been >> reviewed and accepted by the community. > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0So what do we do about companies that release a product th= at says "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed= to trunk? > It's not just companies by the way, we the Hadoop project just made an official Apache release that contains patches not yet in trunk... From general-return-3531-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:22:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB0DE46FE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77923 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:22:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77877 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77869 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:22:58 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:22:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.169.178.234]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:22:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4DCDAF3D.7060409@apache.org> Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:22:53 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> <8A7603B9-A6C0-4FC7-8B45-CEF3035244F0@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8A7603B9-A6C0-4FC7-8B45-CEF3035244F0@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/14/2011 12:17 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > ... and if those patches are rejected by the community? It would be very strange, since they've mostly been released in 203, although not yet having been committed to trunk. Doug From general-return-3532-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:28:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 455284966 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86475 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:28:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86422 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:28:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86414 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:28:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:28:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.177] (HELO homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:28:34 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D2428076 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:28:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=EcmvcGNMCozTez3IYXsJN+cDj6iIN4tutUb2/mpTT/yemy3bDW+y qm2o48jQgGOQ5I9TSZMEnyJRCRFUIfDMdhpZncSgTM70myKo1cX4amhW49OGKtay +a39X75vuP5av+UZM1/3GsJGSmIFSzYcP8jTHHaH5IYs1K+wYuJv7WM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=tsfxa0WJnZeX7tJJHpvpoUV48w8=; b=5QjY+M8+9mLZZEaS4G1etmpb2UG6 OnsCQjuFeMxqDvkSAV/lIXwUYfhuaVC8uQKSfUBUslXqy4hI7l4aqo+fHAzpM6EV 2DoWPFyBHrFvkc3/mD3IWHWbVoT2tvwNapMr0FtcblSGzrgR10G4fEwrUX3Rz6nm YCDQxUmA1wv1wk0= Received: from [10.134.89.86] (unknown [75.103.10.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF44442806E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:26:45 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <318DA92B-E9BB-4E8F-9FFB-4AA70E6FF1EB@gbiv.com> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache >> release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are >> they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? > > No. Those are the two cases we permit. We used to say that it was > enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that > committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has been > reviewed and accepted by the community. Committed to a releasable branch, actually. In other words, a branch (including trunk) that the PMC is collaborating on towards release at some point in the future. ....Roy From general-return-3533-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:33:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA0DF4CFC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95556 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:33:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95491 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:33:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95483 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:33:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:33:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:33:50 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4DMXT90030667 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:29 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id AC0FA4422F17 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com ([10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id ldKdSsY4BjgkxuDE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4DMXSNe023532 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:28 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:28 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:33:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwRvcdfcMDGgpIHSLChYJEq3fXs1w== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok... Hum, look, I've been force fed a couple of margaritas so, my memory is a = bit foggy... You say your clients connect on nic A. Your cluster connects on nic B. What happens when you want to upload a file from your client to HDFS? Or = even access it? =2E.. ;-) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 4:15 PM, "Evert Lammerts" wr= ote: > Hi Mike, >=20 > Thanks for trying to help out. >=20 > I had a talk with our networking guys this afternoon. According to them= (and this is way out of my area of expertise, so excuse any mistakes) mu= ltiple interfaces shouldn't be a problem. We could set up a nameserver to= resolve hostnames to addresses in our private space when the request com= es from one of the nodes, and route this traffic over a single interface.= Any other request can be resolved to an address in the public space, whi= ch is bound to an other interface. In our current setup we're not even re= solving hostnames in our private address space through a nameserver - we = do it with an ugly hack in /etc/hosts. And it seems to work alright. >=20 > Having said that, our problems are still not completely gone even after= adjusting the maximum allowed RAM for tasks - although things are lots b= etter. While writing this mail three out of five DN's were marked as dead= =2E There still is some swapping going on, but the cores are not spending= any time in WAIT, so this shouldn't be the cause of anything. See below = a trace from a dead DN - any thoughts are appreciated! >=20 > Cheers, > Evert >=20 > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,716 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Received block blk_-9131821326787012529_2915672 src: /192.168.28.2= 11:60136 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 382425 > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9132067116195286882_13088= 8 java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,925 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:3513= 9, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001437_0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 6254000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,032 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Received block blk_-9149862728087355005_3793421 src: /192.168.28.2= 10:41197 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 245767 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: writeBlock blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 received exception java= =2Eio.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Da= taNode: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-4433528= 39-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):= DataXceiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBu= f(BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNext= Packet(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveP= acket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveB= lock(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock= (DataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXc= eiver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:3291= 0, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001443_0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4323000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:3513= 8, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001440_0, offset: 197120, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5573000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,159 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:3857= 4, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001444_0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 16939000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,209 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Received block blk_-9123390874940601805_2898225 src: /192.168.28.2= 10:44227 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 300441 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,217 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:4236= 4, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001451_0, offset: 198656, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5291000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,252 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:3293= 0, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001436_0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-129112867361= 6, blockid: blk_-1800696633107072247_4099834, duration: 5099000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,256 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:4236= 3, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001458_0, offset: 199680, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4945000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,257 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:3513= 7, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001436_0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4159000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9140444589483291821_35859= 75 java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: writeBlock blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 received exception jav= a.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,259 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Da= taNode: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-4433528= 39-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):= DataXceiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBu= f(BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNext= Packet(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveP= acket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveB= lock(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock= (DataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXc= eiver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:3855= 3, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001441_0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-129112867361= 6, blockid: blk_-5819719631677148140_4098274, duration: 5625000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:3853= 5, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001438_0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128= 673616, blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4473000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-44335283= 9-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020): = Exception writing block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 to mirror 192.16= 8.28.213:50050 > java.io.IOException: The stream is closed > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputSt= ream.java:108) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream= =2Ejava:65) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:= 123) > at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveB= lock(BlockReceiver.java:540) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock= (DataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXc= eiver.java:122) >=20 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:4548= 4, bytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_= 001432_0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-129112867361= 6, blockid: blk_405051931214094755_4098504, duration: 5597000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,273 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Received block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 src: /192.168.28.2= 11:49208 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 3033173 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,313 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode: Received block blk_-9144765354308563975_3310572 src: /192.168.28.2= 11:51592 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 242383 >=20 > ________________________________________ > From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 2:36 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: ; > Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's >=20 > Bonded will work but you may not see the performance you would expect. = If you need >1 GBe, go 10GBe less headache and has even more headroom. >=20 > Multiple interfaces won't work. Or I should say didn't work in past rel= eases. > If you think about it, clients have to connect to each node. So having = two interfaces and trying to manage them makes no sense. >=20 > Add to this trying to manage this in DNS ... Why make more work for you= rself? > Going from memory... It looked like you rDNS had to match you hostnames= so your internal interfaces had to match hostnames so you had an inverte= d network. >=20 > If you draw out your network topology you end up with a ladder. > You would be better off (IMHO) to create a subnet where only your edge = servers are dual nic'd. > But then if your cluster is for development... Now your PCs can't be us= ed as clients... >=20 > Does this make sense? >=20 >=20 > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >=20 > Mike Segel >=20 > On May 13, 2011, at 4:57 AM, "Evert Lammerts" = wrote: >=20 >> Hi Mike, >>=20 >>> You really really don't want to do this. >>> Long story short... It won't work. >>=20 >> Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or abou= t having a separated network for interconnects and external network? What= can go wrong there? >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. The= y >>> should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your >>> cluster has a single network to worry about. >>=20 >> That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a = SPOE. However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. W= e want to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact w= ith the cluster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit = their jobs from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up H= adoop ports for the world, is my understanding: if people interact with H= DFS they need to be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be= the argument against this? >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Evert >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>>=20 >>> Mike Segel >>>=20 >>> On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>>>=20 >>>> Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance >>> problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you ar= e not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminat= ion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conten= ts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in e= rror, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message an= d any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3534-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:54:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F38248DB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23968 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:54:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23918 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:54:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23910 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:54:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:29 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so3486833vxa.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.110.135 with SMTP id ia7mr2832589vdb.294.1305327248065; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:54:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.112.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:53:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:53:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5486072efc2f104a3302ec0 --bcaec5486072efc2f104a3302ec0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage. Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn't that the definition of a derived work? On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > On 05/13/2011 07:28 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> If it has a modified version of Hadoop (i.e., not an actual Apache > >> release or patches which have never been committed to trunk), are > >> they allowed to say "includes Apache Hadoop"? > > > > No. Those are the two cases we permit. We used to say that it was > > enough for a patch to be in Jira, but Roy clarified last year that > > committed to trunk is a better line, since that means the code has been > > reviewed and accepted by the community. > > > So what do we do about companies that release a product that says > "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed to > trunk? > > > --bcaec5486072efc2f104a3302ec0-- From general-return-3535-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:57:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 136894991 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29032 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:57:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28981 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:57:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28973 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:57:54 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:57:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:57:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:57:48 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some = such > that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common = usage. >=20 > Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >=20 > So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of = what > happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And = isn't > that the definition of a derived work? Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim = "includes Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). From general-return-3536-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 23:17:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8823F4C5E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44192 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:17:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44140 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:17:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44132 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:17:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:17:37 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3524866vws.35 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=qGnKWqcLH00M3I/+k4egXwuNyuaIJkXNFsLdAy8nzkk=; b=MSS97qs7Xirn9OUwla2u4yBa5pvgyLFIHlg4gG4Uui8DYQGQzTC391GLpW2CuccDwX ofs0dKBbOp4OzKdwGoy0iDRCR5vt2x3m4SAYH5UPZ0BiLZunEgRWpCiZYTq/ZrE/bkWt W9MrQonZAydGrxYf0Sn/8gN+dQueCuCupn7X4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=GUdqfHLCt8CzvgR3HuLFnV9ecW4S3NtBQdn5Gd3UBvlHlTZJhnvvuUlGrK9TUDlQ2W jKMSP0sYYj4UKPSvLdOlHCKxgyuN+a/8ANVUNrdQgxeZZns0d5CAszkpmx9bdFyRpKC2 V8m9GQ5873IXv3/mfKO2Ey8VqmeIKBygRj4+I= Received: by 10.52.112.227 with SMTP id it3mr2941803vdb.84.1305328636806; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.47] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q2sm912627vbv.22.2011.05.13.16.17.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 May 2011 16:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: What is "Hadoop?" Was: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 09:17:11 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3B4F5C8A-3404-4435-9EC3-88438BCC5730@Holsman.NET> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On May 14, 2011, at 12:41 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Steve Loughran = wrote: >=20 >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own = agendas >> define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>=20 >=20 > I agree completely. As you point out, this week we've had a flood of > products calling themselves "Hadoop" or "Distribution of Hadoop" that > include only a part of Hadoop. This is will dilute Apache's Hadoop = trademark > and create consumer confusion. >=20 > Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of = this, >>=20 >=20 > +1 > Plugins are usually considered independent works. Note that the Apache > license does permit commercial closed-source derivative works. A = company > could take Hadoop's code, modify it, and sell a binary release as long = as > they meet the conditions of the Apache license. >=20 >=20 >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their = opinions. >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of = Apache >> Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate filesystems, MR >> engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem = XYZ" >>=20 >=20 > The Hadoop name is the primary tool that the project has for = minimizing > customer confusion. I think we need to create a very clear definition = of > what can be called Hadoop and what can not. Apache gives the PMCs a = fair > amount of latitude in picking the policy for their project name and I = think > we need to do so. >=20 > Given the large number of so-called Hadoop products that are being = released, > I believe that we should require "Hadoop" to mean specifically the = Apache > Hadoop releases (possibly with a few critical security patches). >=20 > Projects that are derivative works can either be "powered by Apache = Hadoop," > or "based on Apache Hadoop." >=20 > What do others think? >=20 I think thats a great idea.=20 Maybe we should also create names/marks around the interfaces as well. > -- Owen From general-return-3537-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 08:53:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5709B6544 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 08:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82729 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 08:53:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82642 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 08:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82634 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 08:53:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 08:53:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 08:53:44 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:53:23 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:53:02 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:53:01 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwRvcdfcMDGgpIHSLChYJEq3fXs1wAVPNYp Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, I'll give this scenario a try (in spite of the intoxication ;-)). =3D putting or getting a file =3D A client will access the NameNode first and get a list of hostnames. These = will resolve to addresses either in public or in private space, depending o= n whether the request to the nameserver was made by a machine in public or = in private space. Each node has one NIC listening on its address in private= space and one on its address in public space. The Hadoop daemons are bound= to 0.0.0.0:*. Reverse DNS will return an address in private space when the= client connects from one of the nodes, and (obviously) an address in publi= c space when the request came through WAN. I'm not sure what could go wrong here... On Monday I'll recheck this scenar= io with our HPN guys as well. Cheers, Evert ________________________________________ From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:33 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Ok... Hum, look, I've been force fed a couple of margaritas so, my memory is a bi= t foggy... You say your clients connect on nic A. Your cluster connects on nic B. What happens when you want to upload a file from your client to HDFS? Or ev= en access it? ... ;-) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 4:15 PM, "Evert Lammerts" wrot= e: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for trying to help out. > > I had a talk with our networking guys this afternoon. According to them (= and this is way out of my area of expertise, so excuse any mistakes) multip= le interfaces shouldn't be a problem. We could set up a nameserver to resol= ve hostnames to addresses in our private space when the request comes from = one of the nodes, and route this traffic over a single interface. Any other= request can be resolved to an address in the public space, which is bound = to an other interface. In our current setup we're not even resolving hostna= mes in our private address space through a nameserver - we do it with an ug= ly hack in /etc/hosts. And it seems to work alright. > > Having said that, our problems are still not completely gone even after a= djusting the maximum allowed RAM for tasks - although things are lots bette= r. While writing this mail three out of five DN's were marked as dead. Ther= e still is some swapping going on, but the cores are not spending any time = in WAIT, so this shouldn't be the cause of anything. See below a trace from= a dead DN - any thoughts are appreciated! > > Cheers, > Evert > > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,716 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9131821326787012529_2915672 src: /192.168.28.211:6= 0136 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 382425 > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 ja= va.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,925 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35139, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001437= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 6254000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,032 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9149862728087355005_3793421 src: /192.168.28.210:4= 1197 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 245767 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: writeBlock blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 received exception java.io.= EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Data= Node: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-1= 45.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXc= eiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(= BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPa= cket(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32910, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001443= _0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4323000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35138, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001440= _0, offset: 197120, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5573000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,159 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38574, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001444= _0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 16939000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,209 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9123390874940601805_2898225 src: /192.168.28.210:4= 4227 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 300441 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,217 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42364, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001451= _0, offset: 198656, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5291000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,252 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32930, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_-1800696633107072247_4099834, duration: 5099000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,256 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42363, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001458= _0, offset: 199680, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4945000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,257 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35137, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4159000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 j= ava.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: writeBlock blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 received exception java.io= .EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,259 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Data= Node: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-1= 45.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXc= eiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(= BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPa= cket(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38553, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001441= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_-5819719631677148140_4098274, duration: 5625000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38535, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001438= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4473000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-14= 5.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020): Except= ion writing block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 to mirror 192.168.28.213= :50050 > java.io.IOException: The stream is closed > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStre= am.java:108) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.j= ava:65) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:12= 3) > at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:540) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:45484, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001432= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_405051931214094755_4098504, duration: 5597000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,273 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 src: /192.168.28.211:4= 9208 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 3033173 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,313 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9144765354308563975_3310572 src: /192.168.28.211:5= 1592 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 242383 > > ________________________________________ > From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 2:36 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: ; > Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's > > Bonded will work but you may not see the performance you would expect. I= f you need >1 GBe, go 10GBe less headache and has even more headroom. > > Multiple interfaces won't work. Or I should say didn't work in past relea= ses. > If you think about it, clients have to connect to each node. So having tw= o interfaces and trying to manage them makes no sense. > > Add to this trying to manage this in DNS ... Why make more work for yours= elf? > Going from memory... It looked like you rDNS had to match you hostnames s= o your internal interfaces had to match hostnames so you had an inverted ne= twork. > > If you draw out your network topology you end up with a ladder. > You would be better off (IMHO) to create a subnet where only your edge se= rvers are dual nic'd. > But then if your cluster is for development... Now your PCs can't be used= as clients... > > Does this make sense? > > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On May 13, 2011, at 4:57 AM, "Evert Lammerts" wr= ote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >>> You really really don't want to do this. >>> Long story short... It won't work. >> >> Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or about = having a separated network for interconnects and external network? What can= go wrong there? >> >>> >>> Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They >>> should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your >>> cluster has a single network to worry about. >> >> That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a SP= OE. However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. We wa= nt to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact with th= e cluster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit their jo= bs from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up Hadoop port= s for the world, is my understanding: if people interact with HDFS they nee= d to be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be the argument = against this? >> >> Cheers, >> Evert >> >>> >>> >>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>> >>> Mike Segel >>> >>> On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>>> >>>> Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance >>> problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are no= t the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, d= istribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is s= trictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, plea= se notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy o= f it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is = intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, dis= tribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is str= ictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please= notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of = it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3538-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 20:09:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D69A16D81 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26524 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 20:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26471 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 20:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26463 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 20:09:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:09:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 20:09:29 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Sat, 14 May 2011 22:09:07 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Sat, 14 May 2011 22:09:07 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 22:08:01 +0200 Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Topic: Stability issue - dead DN's Thread-Index: AcwRvcdfcMDGgpIHSLChYJEq3fXs1wAVPNYpABf5Yeo= Message-ID: References: ,, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just to check: the NN gives back hostnames of DN's to the client when getti= ng or putting data, and not IP addresses right? Cheers, Evert ________________________________________ From: Evert Lammerts [Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 10:53 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Stability issue - dead DN's Ok, I'll give this scenario a try (in spite of the intoxication ;-)). =3D putting or getting a file =3D A client will access the NameNode first and get a list of hostnames. These = will resolve to addresses either in public or in private space, depending o= n whether the request to the nameserver was made by a machine in public or = in private space. Each node has one NIC listening on its address in private= space and one on its address in public space. The Hadoop daemons are bound= to 0.0.0.0:*. Reverse DNS will return an address in private space when the= client connects from one of the nodes, and (obviously) an address in publi= c space when the request came through WAN. I'm not sure what could go wrong here... On Monday I'll recheck this scenar= io with our HPN guys as well. Cheers, Evert ________________________________________ From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:33 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's Ok... Hum, look, I've been force fed a couple of margaritas so, my memory is a bi= t foggy... You say your clients connect on nic A. Your cluster connects on nic B. What happens when you want to upload a file from your client to HDFS? Or ev= en access it? ... ;-) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 13, 2011, at 4:15 PM, "Evert Lammerts" wrot= e: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for trying to help out. > > I had a talk with our networking guys this afternoon. According to them (= and this is way out of my area of expertise, so excuse any mistakes) multip= le interfaces shouldn't be a problem. We could set up a nameserver to resol= ve hostnames to addresses in our private space when the request comes from = one of the nodes, and route this traffic over a single interface. Any other= request can be resolved to an address in the public space, which is bound = to an other interface. In our current setup we're not even resolving hostna= mes in our private address space through a nameserver - we do it with an ug= ly hack in /etc/hosts. And it seems to work alright. > > Having said that, our problems are still not completely gone even after a= djusting the maximum allowed RAM for tasks - although things are lots bette= r. While writing this mail three out of five DN's were marked as dead. Ther= e still is some swapping going on, but the cores are not spending any time = in WAIT, so this shouldn't be the cause of anything. See below a trace from= a dead DN - any thoughts are appreciated! > > Cheers, > Evert > > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,716 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9131821326787012529_2915672 src: /192.168.28.211:6= 0136 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 382425 > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 ja= va.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:27,925 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35139, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001437= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 6254000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,032 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9149862728087355005_3793421 src: /192.168.28.210:4= 1197 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 245767 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Block blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: writeBlock blk_-9132067116195286882_130888 received exception java.io.= EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Data= Node: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-1= 45.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXc= eiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 3744913 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(= BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPa= cket(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32910, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001443= _0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4323000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,038 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35138, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001440= _0, offset: 197120, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5573000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,159 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38574, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001444= _0, offset: 197632, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 16939000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,209 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9123390874940601805_2898225 src: /192.168.28.210:4= 4227 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 300441 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,217 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42364, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001451= _0, offset: 198656, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 5291000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,252 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:32930, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_-1800696633107072247_4099834, duration: 5099000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,256 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:42363, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001458= _0, offset: 199680, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4945000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,257 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.214:35137, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001436= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4159000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Exception in receiveBlock for block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 j= ava.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Block blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 unfinalized and removed. > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: writeBlock blk_-9140444589483291821_3585975 received exception java.io= .EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,259 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Data= Node: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-1= 45.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020):DataXc= eiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 100 bytes > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readToBuf(= BlockReceiver.java:270) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.readNextPa= cket(BlockReceiver.java:357) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receivePac= ket(BlockReceiver.java:378) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:534) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38553, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001441= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_-5819719631677148140_4098274, duration: 5625000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,264 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.212:38535, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001438= _0, offset: 196608, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, = blockid: blk_-9163184839986480695_4112368, duration: 4473000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: DatanodeRegistration(192.168.28.214:50050, storageID=3DDS-443352839-14= 5.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, infoPort=3D50075, ipcPort=3D50020): Except= ion writing block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 to mirror 192.168.28.213= :50050 > java.io.IOException: The stream is closed > at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStre= am.java:108) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.j= ava:65) > at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:12= 3) > at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.receiveBlo= ck(BlockReceiver.java:540) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(D= ataXceiver.java:417) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXcei= ver.java:122) > > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,265 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode.clienttrace: src: /192.168.28.214:50050, dest: /192.168.28.213:45484, b= ytes: 0, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_attempt_201105131125_0025_m_001432= _0, offset: 0, srvID: DS-443352839-145.100.2.183-50050-1291128673616, block= id: blk_405051931214094755_4098504, duration: 5597000 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,273 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9150014886921014525_2267869 src: /192.168.28.211:4= 9208 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 3033173 > 2011-05-13 23:13:28,313 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataN= ode: Received block blk_-9144765354308563975_3310572 src: /192.168.28.211:5= 1592 dest: /192.168.28.214:50050 of size 242383 > > ________________________________________ > From: Segel, Mike [msegel@navteq.com] > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 2:36 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: ; > Subject: Re: Stability issue - dead DN's > > Bonded will work but you may not see the performance you would expect. I= f you need >1 GBe, go 10GBe less headache and has even more headroom. > > Multiple interfaces won't work. Or I should say didn't work in past relea= ses. > If you think about it, clients have to connect to each node. So having tw= o interfaces and trying to manage them makes no sense. > > Add to this trying to manage this in DNS ... Why make more work for yours= elf? > Going from memory... It looked like you rDNS had to match you hostnames s= o your internal interfaces had to match hostnames so you had an inverted ne= twork. > > If you draw out your network topology you end up with a ladder. > You would be better off (IMHO) to create a subnet where only your edge se= rvers are dual nic'd. > But then if your cluster is for development... Now your PCs can't be used= as clients... > > Does this make sense? > > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On May 13, 2011, at 4:57 AM, "Evert Lammerts" wr= ote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >>> You really really don't want to do this. >>> Long story short... It won't work. >> >> Can you elaborate? Are you talking about the bonded interfaces or about = having a separated network for interconnects and external network? What can= go wrong there? >> >>> >>> Just a suggestion.. You don't want anyone on your cluster itself. They >>> should interact wit edge nodes, which are 'Hadoop aware'. Then your >>> cluster has a single network to worry about. >> >> That's our current setup. We have a single headnode that is used as a SP= OE. However, I'd like to change that on our future production system. We wa= nt to implement Kerberos for authentication, and let users interact with th= e cluster from their own machine. This would enable them to submit their jo= bs from the local IDE. The only way to do this is by opening up Hadoop port= s for the world, is my understanding: if people interact with HDFS they nee= d to be able to interact with all nodes, right? What would be the argument = against this? >> >> Cheers, >> Evert >> >>> >>> >>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>> >>> Mike Segel >>> >>> On May 11, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for interconnects >>>>>> * a 2x1GE bonded network interface for external access >>>> >>>> Multiple NICs on a box can sometimes cause big performance >>> problems with Hadoop. So watch your traffic carefully. >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are no= t the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, d= istribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is s= trictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, plea= se notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy o= f it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is = intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, dis= tribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is str= ictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please= notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of = it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3539-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 05:19:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 998376F14 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38250 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:19:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37869 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:19:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37860 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 05:19:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:19:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:19:40 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c136.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.136]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4G5Ispg062453 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 22:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305523136; bh=6l/dREewmWaD2UWiCVswgloVIJtGyxlfCKtzoi6yDqg=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=F3cpbPZOc1TavZpWFBlxTC0FWAYMh6P2Oyu8ICXe6h/09MoHYhAkWfYtkr1ogHL3j tbla4/XBp8H+iT8KR1A6Pb5QrdsOlb1lqql5lGfrfR6x26/RJbJtIZ/4XqUU49pias 2ikCY/N/tMeChnOUqnjp0ZOrU7RUNPd/PKkHBG00= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: What is "Hadoop?" Was: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <3B4F5C8A-3404-4435-9EC3-88438BCC5730@Holsman.NET> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 22:18:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0F7B3B62-03AB-40AE-AF03-68669A963CD8@yahoo-inc.com> References: <3B4F5C8A-3404-4435-9EC3-88438BCC5730@Holsman.NET> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Interesting point! I can see a future where there are many folks mixing = and matching hadoop and non-hadoop components. Swapping out HDFS seems = particularly popular.=20 On May 13, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: ... > I think thats a great idea.=20 > Maybe we should also create names/marks around the interfaces as well. >=20 >> -- Owen >=20 From general-return-3540-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 05:35:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E025B6566 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49869 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:35:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49806 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49798 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 05:35:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:10 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c136.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.136]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4G5YX6M066673 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 22:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305524075; bh=zIzRqARSiAT/cJ9mk7FgW5KIpc9vWbUr2bkKhea+pWc=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=HG4EQIGq7BFYZdK5MoRe6Kkf0q/BlNpLXI9rIUvj55SPLk7jsjs+wMjI3tG37q8ne BITcV32s6z0AiTrLjpgNF+jN3T/GKtjoAny6pRHhcrHS2ttAYZkh8Gvr9sJ8yNkV7Q rHxG+uIdCIEWuA3zjzLt90cHmeVI3RGOEfAUNG4c= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 22:34:33 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <76368DCE-92A1-4D90-AA04-3074E6BE68AB@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Good point. On May 12, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce > open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that > seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source > software seems like a different task. >=20 > The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software > produced by the ASF. If other folks wish to make factual statements > concerning our software, e.g., that their proprietary software passes > tests that we've created, that may be fine, but I don't think we = should > validate those claims by granting certifications to institutions. = That > ventures outside the mission of the ASF. We are not an accrediting > organization. >=20 > Doug >=20 > On 05/10/2011 12:29 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>=20 >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> Hadoop Compatibility: >> = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D4= 6B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >>=20 >>=20 >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >>=20 >> = http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.p= df >>=20 >>=20 >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it is = an >> improvement. >>=20 >>=20 >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >>=20 >>=20 >> Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of = this, >>=20 >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their = opinions. >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem = XYZ" >>=20 >> Compatibility >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> Source tree, >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop = release >> is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and future >> tests pass >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> compatibility testing >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> bugreps to make them more formal. >>=20 >> Certification >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say = "Certified" >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test = suites >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> mean by this >>=20 >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test = module >> that can be used to test real deployments. >>=20 From general-return-3541-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 05:35:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6958A6576 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51416 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51262 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 05:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51254 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 05:35:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 05:35:34 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c136.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.136]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4G5YX6N066673 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 22:34:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1305524096; bh=ROJsPuYSDGQhH5HMkSvfv4N/yrunrErKFi625OnQqHY=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=u5YVZlvKAFbexyjsK8Z8eldPImxxYDoJiP4wPhS8ZcJWbG8wCykP1+r5AW5QIns00 SKf8hU0aeuaWZ1miVJ0S0LWxLa+Lt+/agaBnOPJ7mHjQwkSjCK4Dp2HD3oBM3IsjIc eZJlFTcHhyhwpjyjK+U+chUm59jdz475A7FXjD9o= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 22:34:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Good point. =20 Tests are a must for the Hadoop community to meet its own goals (quality = and backwards compatibility). Writing detailed specs for something that = is evolving this quickly is challenging. Also in a lot of cases, = documenting the current APIs to POSIX like detail will mainly convince = us that we need to design new APIs that are more like POSIX. The good news is that this is open source and we can crowd source both = activities, although it will still require a lot of work from our = committers to validate and integrate this sort of contribution. E14 On May 12, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: ... > Therefore, all I am saying is that, while a POSIX-like spec is a "nice = to > have", a test-suite that defines compatibility is a must. >=20 > - milind From general-return-3542-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 10:50:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 992676AB6 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 10:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66019 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 10:50:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65941 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 10:50:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65933 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 10:50:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 10:50:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 10:50:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBC9B7E0E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:50:21 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yPtNHTId4Q0A for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:50:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA19B7D65 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:50:17 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306147805.48942@HN6lz3kfG8z8cu6Rbe40Fw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4GAo324005307 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:50:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DD1015B.4090905@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:50:03 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4GAo324005307 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 13/05/11 05:52, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I may > have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them > were in English, which is characterized as a natural language. > > But then, if you are proposing a specification in a non-natural-language, > isn't that called a test suite ? Or is there a middle ground ? There's formal specifications in languages like Z, We don't really want to go there if we can help it, as all it lets you do is prove correctness if you're a mathematician, and I haven't found the mathematician plugin for Jenkins yet. There's also languages like Extended ML, from Sanella et al, who may be familiar to Doug from his time in the frozen lands of the north (edinburgh): http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/dts/eml/ Some of the bits of spec in this language can be executed, as long as you don't start declaring things about state over time. Again, though, it's hard work, unless your target language is, say ML or Haskell, as there you can jump from Specification to Implementation fairly rapidly Where the formal stuff is good for is things like consistency protocols, so I'd hope someone did get out the proofs for Zookeeper, so the rest of us can rely on it working. -Steve From general-return-3543-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 11:02:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF55F6913 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80651 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:02:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80565 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:02:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80557 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 11:02:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:02:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:02:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F71C1BA5A5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:02:05 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uNk7LbEzEwsC for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:02:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E05B1BA534 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:02:04 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306148512.654@xHKeAASKaWnqshtZ1RElVg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4GB1qpg005671 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:01:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:01:52 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4GB1qpg005671 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such >> that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage. >> >> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >> >> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what >> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn't >> that the definition of a derived work? > > > Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). > > but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order you may end up with a different body of source code...) Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR patent may not apply to such implementations. From general-return-3544-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 11:16:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AA4A669F for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92626 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92575 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92566 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 11:16:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:16:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:16:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC9B1BA757 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:15:41 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id as5UGAoM6Urn for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:15:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9FA1BA5A5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:15:40 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306149329.09556@sPfeztXRZBWZVEaHUTxVKg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4GBFRrR006035 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:15:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DD1074F.1040009@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:15:27 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DCDADA0.5090704@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4GBFRrR006035 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 13/05/11 23:16, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 05/14/2011 12:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> So what do we do about companies that release a product that says "includes Apache Hadoop" but includes patches that aren't committed to trunk? > > We yell at them to get those patches into trunk already. This policy > was clarified after that product was shipping. > > Doug I distributed some RPMs with my lifecycle branch in, I can't remember what I called them, but I'd better revist all my .spec files to make sure the text is valid. Even with 0.21 JARs, what should I call it? sf-apache-hadoop-operations.rpm "This RPM contains the JAR artifacts of Apache Hadoop 0.21 and SmartFrog components to manage hadoop clusters, manipulate the distributed filesystems, and submit MapReduce jobs" Would that work? From general-return-3545-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 11:21:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 748836888 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98786 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:21:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98721 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 11:21:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98713 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 11:21:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:20:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DE41BA5A5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:20:37 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6uJWg395+iYx for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:20:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A091BA534 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:20:36 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306149624.59408@MK2D6cYjf8Y2qQoUy5zxYQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4GBKOtQ006148 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:20:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DD10878.4040109@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:20:24 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4GBKOtQ006148 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 13/05/11 07:16, Doug Cutting wrote: > Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce > open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that > seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source > software seems like a different task. > +1 That said, some stricter definition of public interfaces may be useful for the related projects, as a consistent open source stack is strongly beneficial. > The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software > produced by the ASF. If other folks wish to make factual statements > concerning our software, e.g., that their proprietary software passes > tests that we've created, that may be fine, but I don't think we should > validate those claims by granting certifications to institutions. That > ventures outside the mission of the ASF. We are not an accrediting > organization. +1. Apache is not a standards body, except in the form of "de-facto standards defined by working code and their test suite" What it does have a strict rules about naming. We should formalise them and publish them on the wiki, then whenever some product gets press-released (it's like a beta-release, only earlier in the lifecycle), the vendor can be directed to the page and reminded of the T&Cs of the license and any trade marks. What does this mean for T-Shirts and Stickers, incidentally? From general-return-3546-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 12:01:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F01E66C8E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53729 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 12:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53651 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 12:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53643 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 12:00:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:00:51 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4GC0T8l011832 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:29 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 5291841CA57D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com ([10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id aqEVORZ8HS07o1gw for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4GC0TNe029270 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:29 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:28 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 07:00:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwTwNj/zlsDHXdeTBGDSG818Gfdng== Message-ID: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. The math example is a bit flawed... X represents the set of stable releases. Y represents the set of available patches. C represents the set of Cloudera releases. So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained i= n Y, Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made available= to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components ar= e in Apache. (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additiona= l toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented th= eir changes. Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset, = but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Includes = Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache Ha= doop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product i= s better.(that's marketing for you...) Clearly there are others out there...=20 Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is on= the table... But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time c= ontrolling derivative works... =20 I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential l= oss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and a= s long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I am = obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on the = opinion of my client... (you know the rest....) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>=20 >> On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>=20 >>> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some= such >>> that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usa= ge. >>>=20 >>> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >>>=20 >>> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of wh= at >>> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And i= sn't >>> that the definition of a derived work? >>=20 >>=20 >> Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includ= es Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is,=20 > (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a=20 > derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset.= =20 > Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a=20 > sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different orde= r=20 > you may end up with a different body of source code...) >=20 > Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work,=20 > depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look=20 > at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room=20 > implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of=20 > facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may=20 > encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR= =20 > patent may not apply to such implementations. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3547-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 14:12:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9FDF68E6 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74200 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 14:12:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74150 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 14:12:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74142 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 14:12:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:12:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:11:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412411BA2FB for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:11:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id RrZjPKvrNq2a for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:11:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6B1BA264 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:11:31 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306159879.68@tu5wJpRoBroUMiEn+Qsy7w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4GEBI0V011077 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:11:19 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DD13086.1040608@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:11:18 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4GEBI0V011077 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 16/05/11 13:00, Segel, Mike wrote: > But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. > > The math example is a bit flawed... > > X represents the set of stable releases. > Y represents the set of available patches. > C represents the set of Cloudera releases. > > So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained in Y, > Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? > It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... It certainly contains it. Now, if you want to make life more complex: -view the contributions to the code base as a series of patches P1...Pn, each of which changes the code. -These patches are essentially functions that transform the source S to a new state S'. -the initial state of the source codebase is S0. Hypothesis: the order in which the patch functions are applied determines the final state of the source tree. If patches P1 and P2 were applied in order, you would get a state S' = P2(P1(S0)) Applying the patches in a different order, you get a new final state. S'' = P1(P2(S0)) Question for the maths people then is: can you be sure that S' and S'' are the same. As it would seem to me that it depends on the nature of the function. It could be that the set of functions that SVN supports guarantees sameness, but given conflict resolution problems I've encountered in the past, I doubt this. Assuming that my belief holds: that the order in which a series of SVN patches are executed determines the final state of the source tree, then saying the patch sets -the set of functions applied to the source- of two codebases are equivalent does not mean the final state of the code is the same unless the sequence of application is also the same. That would then define an apache release as a strictly ordered sequence of patches, or at least an sequence of operations that leads to the same final code state, such as S0.20.3 (oh look, I've just written a formal definition of what a release is, though I've avoided defining what a function is. View them as planar projections in cartesian space or something) > > So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components are in Apache. > (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) > > Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. > And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. Once you start thinking about the ordering of the patch functions it gets complicated. > That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented their changes. yes, though again it depends on the sequence of functions applied to the released sourcecode, such as S0.20.3, to the version they ship. > So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) I agree > Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is on the table... Clearly, but there are still some questions we can resolve here -what do they call their products? -how can they support assertions that their code is compatible if the series of patches they have applied to the codebase are not externally visible? -what are the concerns of the community about naming and branching? > > But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time controlling derivative works... The Apache license permits anyone to fork and take that fork in house or closed source. Most people are considered daft to do this except for quick fixes, because any closed source takes on the task of writing the functions needed to transform it from the released state to one that matches customer needs. (i.e. the working state) > I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. Possibly. I avoid such legal issues. -steve From general-return-3548-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 16:38:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24403696A for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69999 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 16:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69951 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 16:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69943 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 16:38:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:38:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 16:38:44 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:38:21 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:38:21 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:37:36 +0200 Subject: MAPREDUCE-5 Thread-Topic: MAPREDUCE-5 Thread-Index: AQHME+eqslwvbrLwnkCsqdYAsEnFDA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA1Eplanckkasaran_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA1Eplanckkasaran_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When Reducers start running during a certain job (mapred.reduce.slowstart.c= ompleted.maps =3D 0.8) it takes about 20 minutes before the DN stopd reacti= ng. This seems to be due to a number of Exceptions in the TT - at least, it= 's the only place I'm seeing errors. The three recurring ones are getMapOut= put, EOFException and IllegalStateException. It seems related to https://is= sues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5. See an excerpt from the logs attac= hed. We're running Hadoop 0.20.2 on a 6 node (test) cluster with: # java -version java version "1.6.0_24" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) Can anybody shed some light on this? Thanks a bunch, Evert --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA1Eplanckkasaran_ Content-Type: text/x-log; name="tt.log" Content-Description: tt.log Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tt.log"; size=18782; creation-date="Mon, 16 May 2011 18:59:24 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 16 May 2011 18:59:24 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 CWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmlvLm5pby5TZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuZmx1c2goU2VsZWN0 Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6MjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cEdlbmVy YXRvci5mbHVzaChIdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NzI1KQoJLi4uIDI3IG1vcmUKCjIwMTEtMDUt MTUgMTU6NTA6NDMsNjcwIElORk8gb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2Vy LmNsaWVudHRyYWNlOiBzcmM6IDE5Mi4xNjguMjguMjE0OjUwMDYwLCBkZXN0OiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4 LjIxNDo1MjMxMywgYnl0ZXM6IDY1NTM2LCBvcDogTUFQUkVEX1NIVUZGTEUsIGNsaUlEOiBhdHRl bXB0XzIwMTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwNjk0XzAsIGR1cmF0aW9uOiAxOTAyNDEwMDAKMjAx MS0wNS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0Myw2NzAgRVJST1Igb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkubG9nOiAvbWFwT3V0cHV0Cmph dmEubGFuZy5JbGxlZ2FsU3RhdGVFeGNlcHRpb246IENvbW1pdHRlZAoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXku amV0dHkuUmVzcG9uc2UucmVzZXRCdWZmZXIoUmVzcG9uc2UuamF2YToxMDIzKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1v cnRiYXkuamV0dHkuUmVzcG9uc2Uuc2VuZEVycm9yKFJlc3BvbnNlLmphdmE6MjQwKQoJYXQgb3Jn LmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyJE1hcE91dHB1dFNlcnZsZXQuZG9HZXQo VGFza1RyYWNrZXIuamF2YTozNzE4KQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2bGV0 LnNlcnZpY2UoSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuamF2YTo3MDcpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0dHAuSHR0 cFNlcnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2VydmxldC5qYXZhOjgyMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5Lmpl dHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5qYXZhOjUxMSkK CWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVkQ2hhaW4u ZG9GaWx0ZXIoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3Au aHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmVyJFF1b3RpbmdJbnB1dEZpbHRlci5kb0ZpbHRlcihIdHRwU2VydmVyLmph dmE6ODI0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlciRDYWNo ZWRDaGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJh eS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZh OjM5OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlY3VyaXR5LlNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxlci5oYW5k bGUoU2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MjE2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2Vydmxl dC5TZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxODIpCglhdCBvcmcu bW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0SGFuZGxl ci5qYXZhOjc2NikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LndlYmFwcC5XZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0Lmhh bmRsZShXZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmphdmE6NDUwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFuZGxl ci5Db250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29sbGVjdGlv bi5qYXZhOjIzMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuSGFuZGxlcldyYXBwZXIu aGFuZGxlKEhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmphdmE6MTUyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuU2Vy dmVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2ZXIuamF2YTozMjYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29u bmVjdGlvbi5oYW5kbGVSZXF1ZXN0KEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NTQyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1v cnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24kUmVxdWVzdEhhbmRsZXIuaGVhZGVyQ29tcGxldGUo SHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo5MjgpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwUGFyc2Vy LnBhcnNlTmV4dChIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6NTQ5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0 cFBhcnNlci5wYXJzZUF2YWlsYWJsZShIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6MjEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRi YXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NDA0KQoJ YXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLlNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5ydW4oU2VsZWN0Q2hh bm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6NDEwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkudGhyZWFkLlF1ZXVlZFRocmVh ZFBvb2wkUG9vbFRocmVhZC5ydW4oUXVldWVkVGhyZWFkUG9vbC5qYXZhOjU4MikKMjAxMS0wNS0x NSAxNTo1MDo0Myw3MzEgSU5GTyBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXByZWQuVGFza1RyYWNrZXI6 IGF0dGVtcHRfMjAxMTA1MTQyMTM3XzAwMDFfcl8wMDAwMTBfMCAwLjA4MjE5MzQzJSByZWR1Y2Ug PiBjb3B5ICg2ODUgb2YgMjc3OCBhdCAzLjI0IE1CL3MpID4gCjIwMTEtMDUtMTUgMTU6NTA6NDQs MTE1IElORk8gb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyOiBhdHRlbXB0XzIw MTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAyMjY4XzAgMC45Nzg0NTQlIAoyMDExLTA1LTE1IDE1OjUwOjQ0 LDEzNCBJTkZPIG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLm1hcHJlZC5UYXNrVHJhY2tlci5jbGllbnR0cmFj ZTogc3JjOiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4LjIxNDo1MDA2MCwgZGVzdDogMTkyLjE2OC4yOC4yMTM6MzM0Nzcs IGJ5dGVzOiA2ODY5NjI4LCBvcDogTUFQUkVEX1NIVUZGTEUsIGNsaUlEOiBhdHRlbXB0XzIwMTEw NTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwNjQ3XzAsIGR1cmF0aW9uOiA0MzI4MDQ4MDAwCjIwMTEtMDUtMTUg MTU6NTA6NDQsMjM4IElORk8gb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyLmNs aWVudHRyYWNlOiBzcmM6IDE5Mi4xNjguMjguMjE0OjUwMDYwLCBkZXN0OiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4LjIx MzozMzQ3NywgYnl0ZXM6IDE4LCBvcDogTUFQUkVEX1NIVUZGTEUsIGNsaUlEOiBhdHRlbXB0XzIw MTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwNjcwXzAsIGR1cmF0aW9uOiAzMTQwMDAKMjAxMS0wNS0xNSAx NTo1MDo0NCwyOTkgSU5GTyBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXByZWQuVGFza1RyYWNrZXIuY2xp ZW50dHJhY2U6IHNyYzogMTkyLjE2OC4yOC4yMTQ6NTAwNjAsIGRlc3Q6IDE5Mi4xNjguMjguMjEz OjMzNDcyLCBieXRlczogNzA0MjkxNiwgb3A6IE1BUFJFRF9TSFVGRkxFLCBjbGlJRDogYXR0ZW1w dF8yMDExMDUxNDIxMzdfMDAwMV9tXzAwMDY3MV8wLCBkdXJhdGlvbjogMTA4ODM1NjUwMDAKMjAx MS0wNS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0NCwzODIgSU5GTyBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXByZWQuVGFza1Ry YWNrZXI6IGF0dGVtcHRfMjAxMTA1MTQyMTM3XzAwMDFfbV8wMDIyNjdfMCAwLjg5OTY4NDYlIAoy MDExLTA1LTE1IDE1OjUwOjQ0LDU3NCBXQVJOIG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLm1hcHJlZC5UYXNr VHJhY2tlcjogZ2V0TWFwT3V0cHV0KGF0dGVtcHRfMjAxMTA1MTQyMTM3XzAwMDFfbV8wMDA2NDlf MCwxKSBmYWlsZWQgOgpvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5Fb2ZFeGNlcHRpb24KCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0 YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBHZW5lcmF0b3IuZmx1c2goSHR0cEdlbmVyYXRvci5qYXZhOjc5MSkKCWF0 IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LkFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yJE91dHB1dC5mbHVzaChBYnN0cmFj dEdlbmVyYXRvci5qYXZhOjU2OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9u JE91dHB1dC5mbHVzaChIdHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbi5qYXZhOjEwMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5q ZXR0eS5BYnN0cmFjdEdlbmVyYXRvciRPdXRwdXQud3JpdGUoQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2 YTo2NTEpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5BYnN0cmFjdEdlbmVyYXRvciRPdXRwdXQud3Jp dGUoQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2YTo1ODApCglhdCBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXBy ZWQuVGFza1RyYWNrZXIkTWFwT3V0cHV0U2VydmxldC5kb0dldChUYXNrVHJhY2tlci5qYXZhOjM2 OTMpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0dHAuSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2Vydmxl dC5qYXZhOjcwNykKCWF0IGphdmF4LnNlcnZsZXQuaHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmxldC5zZXJ2aWNlKEh0 dHBTZXJ2bGV0LmphdmE6ODIwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0 SG9sZGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SG9sZGVyLmphdmE6NTExKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0 dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlciRDYWNoZWRDaGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFu ZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMjEpCglhdCBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2ZXIkUXVv dGluZ0lucHV0RmlsdGVyLmRvRmlsdGVyKEh0dHBTZXJ2ZXIuamF2YTo4MjQpCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyJENhY2hlZENoYWluLmRvRmlsdGVyKFNl cnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MTIxMikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2Vy dmxldEhhbmRsZXIuaGFuZGxlKFNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6Mzk5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRi YXkuamV0dHkuc2VjdXJpdHkuU2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZWN1cml0eUhhbmRsZXIu amF2YToyMTYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlc3Npb25IYW5kbGVyLmhh bmRsZShTZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjE4MikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRs ZXIuQ29udGV4dEhhbmRsZXIuaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6NzY2KQoJYXQgb3Jn Lm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkud2ViYXBwLldlYkFwcENvbnRleHQuaGFuZGxlKFdlYkFwcENvbnRleHQu amF2YTo0NTApCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29s bGVjdGlvbi5oYW5kbGUoQ29udGV4dEhhbmRsZXJDb2xsZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6MjMwKQoJYXQgb3Jn Lm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFuZGxlci5IYW5kbGVyV3JhcHBlci5oYW5kbGUoSGFuZGxlcldyYXBw ZXIuamF2YToxNTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5TZXJ2ZXIuaGFuZGxlKFNlcnZlci5q YXZhOjMyNikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmhhbmRsZVJlcXVl c3QoSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo1NDIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29u bmVjdGlvbiRSZXF1ZXN0SGFuZGxlci5oZWFkZXJDb21wbGV0ZShIdHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbi5qYXZh OjkyOCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBQYXJzZXIucGFyc2VOZXh0KEh0dHBQYXJz ZXIuamF2YTo1NDkpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwUGFyc2VyLnBhcnNlQXZhaWxh YmxlKEh0dHBQYXJzZXIuamF2YToyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29ubmVj dGlvbi5oYW5kbGUoSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo0MDQpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5pby5u aW8uU2VsZWN0Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LnJ1bihTZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuamF2YTo0 MTApCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS50aHJlYWQuUXVldWVkVGhyZWFkUG9vbCRQb29sVGhyZWFkLnJ1 bihRdWV1ZWRUaHJlYWRQb29sLmphdmE6NTgyKQpDYXVzZWQgYnk6IGphdmEuaW8uSU9FeGNlcHRp b246IEJyb2tlbiBwaXBlCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNoLkZpbGVEaXNwYXRjaGVyLndyaXRlMChOYXRp dmUgTWV0aG9kKQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5Tb2NrZXREaXNwYXRjaGVyLndyaXRlKFNvY2tldERp c3BhdGNoZXIuamF2YToyOSkKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guSU9VdGlsLndyaXRlRnJvbU5hdGl2ZUJ1 ZmZlcihJT1V0aWwuamF2YTo3MikKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guSU9VdGlsLndyaXRlKElPVXRpbC5q YXZhOjQzKQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5Tb2NrZXRDaGFubmVsSW1wbC53cml0ZShTb2NrZXRDaGFu bmVsSW1wbC5qYXZhOjMzNCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmlvLm5pby5DaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQu Zmx1c2goQ2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6MTcwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLlNl bGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5mbHVzaChTZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuamF2YToyMjEp CglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmZsdXNoKEh0dHBHZW5lcmF0b3Iu amF2YTo3MjUpCgkuLi4gMjYgbW9yZQoKMjAxMS0wNS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0NCw1NzQgV0FSTiBvcmcu bW9ydGJheS5sb2c6IENvbW1pdHRlZCBiZWZvcmUgNDEwIGdldE1hcE91dHB1dChhdHRlbXB0XzIw MTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwNjQ5XzAsMSkgZmFpbGVkIDoKb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHku RW9mRXhjZXB0aW9uCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmZsdXNoKEh0 dHBHZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2YTo3OTEpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5BYnN0cmFjdEdlbmVy YXRvciRPdXRwdXQuZmx1c2goQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2YTo1NjkpCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbiRPdXRwdXQuZmx1c2goSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2 YToxMDEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IkT3V0cHV0Lndy aXRlKEFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NjUxKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuQWJz dHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IkT3V0cHV0LndyaXRlKEFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NTgwKQoJ YXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyJE1hcE91dHB1dFNlcnZsZXQu ZG9HZXQoVGFza1RyYWNrZXIuamF2YTozNjkzKQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBT ZXJ2bGV0LnNlcnZpY2UoSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuamF2YTo3MDcpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0 dHAuSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2VydmxldC5qYXZhOjgyMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0 YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5qYXZh OjUxMSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVk Q2hhaW4uZG9GaWx0ZXIoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5o YWRvb3AuaHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmVyJFF1b3RpbmdJbnB1dEZpbHRlci5kb0ZpbHRlcihIdHRwU2Vy dmVyLmphdmE6ODI0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxl ciRDYWNoZWRDaGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcu bW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxl ci5qYXZhOjM5OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlY3VyaXR5LlNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxl ci5oYW5kbGUoU2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MjE2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHku c2VydmxldC5TZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxODIpCglh dCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0 SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjc2NikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LndlYmFwcC5XZWJBcHBDb250 ZXh0LmhhbmRsZShXZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmphdmE6NDUwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHku aGFuZGxlci5Db250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29s bGVjdGlvbi5qYXZhOjIzMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuSGFuZGxlcldy YXBwZXIuaGFuZGxlKEhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmphdmE6MTUyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0 dHkuU2VydmVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2ZXIuamF2YTozMjYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5I dHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbi5oYW5kbGVSZXF1ZXN0KEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NTQyKQoJYXQg b3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24kUmVxdWVzdEhhbmRsZXIuaGVhZGVyQ29t cGxldGUoSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo5MjgpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRw UGFyc2VyLnBhcnNlTmV4dChIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6NTQ5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0 dHkuSHR0cFBhcnNlci5wYXJzZUF2YWlsYWJsZShIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6MjEyKQoJYXQgb3Jn Lm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6 NDA0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLlNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5ydW4oU2Vs ZWN0Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6NDEwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkudGhyZWFkLlF1ZXVl ZFRocmVhZFBvb2wkUG9vbFRocmVhZC5ydW4oUXVldWVkVGhyZWFkUG9vbC5qYXZhOjU4MikKQ2F1 c2VkIGJ5OiBqYXZhLmlvLklPRXhjZXB0aW9uOiBCcm9rZW4gcGlwZQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5G aWxlRGlzcGF0Y2hlci53cml0ZTAoTmF0aXZlIE1ldGhvZCkKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guU29ja2V0 RGlzcGF0Y2hlci53cml0ZShTb2NrZXREaXNwYXRjaGVyLmphdmE6MjkpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNo LklPVXRpbC53cml0ZUZyb21OYXRpdmVCdWZmZXIoSU9VdGlsLmphdmE6NzIpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlv LmNoLklPVXRpbC53cml0ZShJT1V0aWwuamF2YTo0MykKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guU29ja2V0Q2hh bm5lbEltcGwud3JpdGUoU29ja2V0Q2hhbm5lbEltcGwuamF2YTozMzQpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJh eS5pby5uaW8uQ2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmZsdXNoKENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5qYXZhOjE3MCkK CWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmlvLm5pby5TZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuZmx1c2goU2VsZWN0 Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6MjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cEdlbmVy YXRvci5mbHVzaChIdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NzI1KQoJLi4uIDI2IG1vcmUKCjIwMTEtMDUt MTUgMTU6NTA6NDQsNTc0IElORk8gb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2Vy LmNsaWVudHRyYWNlOiBzcmM6IDE5Mi4xNjguMjguMjE0OjUwMDYwLCBkZXN0OiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4 LjIxMzozMzQ3NywgYnl0ZXM6IDY1NTM2LCBvcDogTUFQUkVEX1NIVUZGTEUsIGNsaUlEOiBhdHRl bXB0XzIwMTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwNjQ5XzAsIGR1cmF0aW9uOiAyNDk5NTQwMDAKMjAx MS0wNS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0NCw1NzQgRVJST1Igb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkubG9nOiAvbWFwT3V0cHV0Cmph dmEubGFuZy5JbGxlZ2FsU3RhdGVFeGNlcHRpb246IENvbW1pdHRlZAoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXku amV0dHkuUmVzcG9uc2UucmVzZXRCdWZmZXIoUmVzcG9uc2UuamF2YToxMDIzKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1v cnRiYXkuamV0dHkuUmVzcG9uc2Uuc2VuZEVycm9yKFJlc3BvbnNlLmphdmE6MjQwKQoJYXQgb3Jn LmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyJE1hcE91dHB1dFNlcnZsZXQuZG9HZXQo VGFza1RyYWNrZXIuamF2YTozNzE4KQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2bGV0 LnNlcnZpY2UoSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuamF2YTo3MDcpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0dHAuSHR0 cFNlcnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2VydmxldC5qYXZhOjgyMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5Lmpl dHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5qYXZhOjUxMSkK CWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVkQ2hhaW4u ZG9GaWx0ZXIoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3Au aHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmVyJFF1b3RpbmdJbnB1dEZpbHRlci5kb0ZpbHRlcihIdHRwU2VydmVyLmph dmE6ODI0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlciRDYWNo ZWRDaGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJh eS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZh OjM5OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlY3VyaXR5LlNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxlci5oYW5k bGUoU2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MjE2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2Vydmxl dC5TZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxODIpCglhdCBvcmcu bW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0SGFuZGxl ci5qYXZhOjc2NikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LndlYmFwcC5XZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0Lmhh bmRsZShXZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmphdmE6NDUwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFuZGxl ci5Db250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29sbGVjdGlv bi5qYXZhOjIzMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuSGFuZGxlcldyYXBwZXIu aGFuZGxlKEhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmphdmE6MTUyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuU2Vy dmVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2ZXIuamF2YTozMjYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29u bmVjdGlvbi5oYW5kbGVSZXF1ZXN0KEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NTQyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1v cnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24kUmVxdWVzdEhhbmRsZXIuaGVhZGVyQ29tcGxldGUo SHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo5MjgpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwUGFyc2Vy LnBhcnNlTmV4dChIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6NTQ5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0 cFBhcnNlci5wYXJzZUF2YWlsYWJsZShIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6MjEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRi YXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NDA0KQoJ YXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLlNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5ydW4oU2VsZWN0Q2hh bm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6NDEwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkudGhyZWFkLlF1ZXVlZFRocmVh ZFBvb2wkUG9vbFRocmVhZC5ydW4oUXVldWVkVGhyZWFkUG9vbC5qYXZhOjU4MikKMjAxMS0wNS0x NSAxNTo1MDo0NCw2NDggSU5GTyBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXByZWQuVGFza1RyYWNrZXI6 IGF0dGVtcHRfMjAxMTA1MTQyMTM3XzAwMDFfbV8wMDIyNTVfMCAxLjAlIAoyMDExLTA1LTE1IDE1 OjUwOjQ0LDk1MyBJTkZPIG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLm1hcHJlZC5UYXNrVHJhY2tlci5jbGll bnR0cmFjZTogc3JjOiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4LjIxNDo1MDA2MCwgZGVzdDogMTkyLjE2OC4yOC4yMTM6 MzM0OTAsIGJ5dGVzOiA2NjQ2MDg3LCBvcDogTUFQUkVEX1NIVUZGTEUsIGNsaUlEOiBhdHRlbXB0 XzIwMTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwMzgyXzAsIGR1cmF0aW9uOiAzNzQ1MDEwMDAKMjAxMS0w NS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0NCw5OTUgV0FSTiBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tYXByZWQuVGFza1RyYWNr ZXI6IGdldE1hcE91dHB1dChhdHRlbXB0XzIwMTEwNTE0MjEzN18wMDAxX21fMDAwMzk0XzAsMTQp IGZhaWxlZCA6Cm9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LkVvZkV4Y2VwdGlvbgoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXku amV0dHkuSHR0cEdlbmVyYXRvci5mbHVzaChIdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NzkxKQoJYXQgb3Jn Lm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IkT3V0cHV0LmZsdXNoKEFic3RyYWN0R2Vu ZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NTY5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24kT3V0 cHV0LmZsdXNoKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6MTAxMikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5 LkFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yJE91dHB1dC53cml0ZShBYnN0cmFjdEdlbmVyYXRvci5qYXZhOjY1 MSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LkFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yJE91dHB1dC53cml0ZShB YnN0cmFjdEdlbmVyYXRvci5qYXZhOjU4MCkKCWF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLm1hcHJlZC5U YXNrVHJhY2tlciRNYXBPdXRwdXRTZXJ2bGV0LmRvR2V0KFRhc2tUcmFja2VyLmphdmE6MzY5MykK CWF0IGphdmF4LnNlcnZsZXQuaHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmxldC5zZXJ2aWNlKEh0dHBTZXJ2bGV0Lmph dmE6NzA3KQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2bGV0LnNlcnZpY2UoSHR0cFNl cnZsZXQuamF2YTo4MjApCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIb2xk ZXIuaGFuZGxlKFNlcnZsZXRIb2xkZXIuamF2YTo1MTEpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5z ZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyJENhY2hlZENoYWluLmRvRmlsdGVyKFNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVy LmphdmE6MTIyMSkKCWF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLmh0dHAuSHR0cFNlcnZlciRRdW90aW5n SW5wdXRGaWx0ZXIuZG9GaWx0ZXIoSHR0cFNlcnZlci5qYXZhOjgyNCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5 LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVkQ2hhaW4uZG9GaWx0ZXIoU2Vydmxl dEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0 SGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YTozOTkpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5q ZXR0eS5zZWN1cml0eS5TZWN1cml0eUhhbmRsZXIuaGFuZGxlKFNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxlci5qYXZh OjIxNikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuaGFuZGxl KFNlc3Npb25IYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MTgyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFuZGxlci5D b250ZXh0SGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoQ29udGV4dEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YTo3NjYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS53ZWJhcHAuV2ViQXBwQ29udGV4dC5oYW5kbGUoV2ViQXBwQ29udGV4dC5qYXZh OjQ1MCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuQ29udGV4dEhhbmRsZXJDb2xsZWN0 aW9uLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uamF2YToyMzApCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmhhbmRsZShIYW5kbGVyV3JhcHBlci5q YXZhOjE1MikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LlNlcnZlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmVyLmphdmE6 MzI2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlUmVxdWVzdChI dHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbi5qYXZhOjU0MikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBDb25uZWN0 aW9uJFJlcXVlc3RIYW5kbGVyLmhlYWRlckNvbXBsZXRlKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6OTI4 KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cFBhcnNlci5wYXJzZU5leHQoSHR0cFBhcnNlci5q YXZhOjU0OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBQYXJzZXIucGFyc2VBdmFpbGFibGUo SHR0cFBhcnNlci5qYXZhOjIxMikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9u LmhhbmRsZShIdHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbi5qYXZhOjQwNCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmlvLm5pby5T ZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQucnVuKFNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5qYXZhOjQxMCkK CWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LnRocmVhZC5RdWV1ZWRUaHJlYWRQb29sJFBvb2xUaHJlYWQucnVuKFF1 ZXVlZFRocmVhZFBvb2wuamF2YTo1ODIpCkNhdXNlZCBieTogamF2YS5pby5JT0V4Y2VwdGlvbjog QnJva2VuIHBpcGUKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guRmlsZURpc3BhdGNoZXIud3JpdGUwKE5hdGl2ZSBN ZXRob2QpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNoLlNvY2tldERpc3BhdGNoZXIud3JpdGUoU29ja2V0RGlzcGF0 Y2hlci5qYXZhOjI5KQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5JT1V0aWwud3JpdGVGcm9tTmF0aXZlQnVmZmVy KElPVXRpbC5qYXZhOjcyKQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5JT1V0aWwud3JpdGUoSU9VdGlsLmphdmE6 NDMpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNoLlNvY2tldENoYW5uZWxJbXBsLndyaXRlKFNvY2tldENoYW5uZWxJ bXBsLmphdmE6MzM0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLkNoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5mbHVz aChDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuamF2YToxNzApCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5pby5uaW8uU2VsZWN0 Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmZsdXNoKFNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5qYXZhOjIyMSkKCWF0 IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5Lkh0dHBHZW5lcmF0b3IuZmx1c2goSHR0cEdlbmVyYXRvci5qYXZh OjcyNSkKCS4uLiAyNiBtb3JlCgoyMDExLTA1LTE1IDE1OjUwOjQ0LDk5NSBXQVJOIG9yZy5tb3J0 YmF5LmxvZzogQ29tbWl0dGVkIGJlZm9yZSA0MTAgZ2V0TWFwT3V0cHV0KGF0dGVtcHRfMjAxMTA1 MTQyMTM3XzAwMDFfbV8wMDAzOTRfMCwxNCkgZmFpbGVkIDoKb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuRW9m RXhjZXB0aW9uCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmZsdXNoKEh0dHBH ZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2YTo3OTEpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5BYnN0cmFjdEdlbmVyYXRv ciRPdXRwdXQuZmx1c2goQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IuamF2YTo1NjkpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJh eS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwQ29ubmVjdGlvbiRPdXRwdXQuZmx1c2goSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTox MDEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuQWJzdHJhY3RHZW5lcmF0b3IkT3V0cHV0LndyaXRl KEFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NjUxKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuQWJzdHJh Y3RHZW5lcmF0b3IkT3V0cHV0LndyaXRlKEFic3RyYWN0R2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NTgwKQoJYXQg b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyJE1hcE91dHB1dFNlcnZsZXQuZG9H ZXQoVGFza1RyYWNrZXIuamF2YTozNjkzKQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2 bGV0LnNlcnZpY2UoSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuamF2YTo3MDcpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0dHAu SHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2VydmxldC5qYXZhOjgyMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5 LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5qYXZhOjUx MSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVkQ2hh aW4uZG9GaWx0ZXIoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRv b3AuaHR0cC5IdHRwU2VydmVyJFF1b3RpbmdJbnB1dEZpbHRlci5kb0ZpbHRlcihIdHRwU2VydmVy LmphdmE6ODI0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlciRD YWNoZWRDaGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5q YXZhOjM5OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlY3VyaXR5LlNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxlci5o YW5kbGUoU2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MjE2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2Vy dmxldC5TZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxODIpCglhdCBv cmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0SGFu ZGxlci5qYXZhOjc2NikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LndlYmFwcC5XZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0 LmhhbmRsZShXZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmphdmE6NDUwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFu ZGxlci5Db250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29sbGVj dGlvbi5qYXZhOjIzMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuSGFuZGxlcldyYXBw ZXIuaGFuZGxlKEhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmphdmE6MTUyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHku U2VydmVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2ZXIuamF2YTozMjYpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRw Q29ubmVjdGlvbi5oYW5kbGVSZXF1ZXN0KEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NTQyKQoJYXQgb3Jn Lm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24kUmVxdWVzdEhhbmRsZXIuaGVhZGVyQ29tcGxl dGUoSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uamF2YTo5MjgpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5qZXR0eS5IdHRwUGFy c2VyLnBhcnNlTmV4dChIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6NTQ5KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHku SHR0cFBhcnNlci5wYXJzZUF2YWlsYWJsZShIdHRwUGFyc2VyLmphdmE6MjEyKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1v cnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cENvbm5lY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKEh0dHBDb25uZWN0aW9uLmphdmE6NDA0 KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuaW8ubmlvLlNlbGVjdENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5ydW4oU2VsZWN0 Q2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6NDEwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkudGhyZWFkLlF1ZXVlZFRo cmVhZFBvb2wkUG9vbFRocmVhZC5ydW4oUXVldWVkVGhyZWFkUG9vbC5qYXZhOjU4MikKQ2F1c2Vk IGJ5OiBqYXZhLmlvLklPRXhjZXB0aW9uOiBCcm9rZW4gcGlwZQoJYXQgc3VuLm5pby5jaC5GaWxl RGlzcGF0Y2hlci53cml0ZTAoTmF0aXZlIE1ldGhvZCkKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guU29ja2V0RGlz cGF0Y2hlci53cml0ZShTb2NrZXREaXNwYXRjaGVyLmphdmE6MjkpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNoLklP VXRpbC53cml0ZUZyb21OYXRpdmVCdWZmZXIoSU9VdGlsLmphdmE6NzIpCglhdCBzdW4ubmlvLmNo LklPVXRpbC53cml0ZShJT1V0aWwuamF2YTo0MykKCWF0IHN1bi5uaW8uY2guU29ja2V0Q2hhbm5l bEltcGwud3JpdGUoU29ja2V0Q2hhbm5lbEltcGwuamF2YTozMzQpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5p by5uaW8uQ2hhbm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmZsdXNoKENoYW5uZWxFbmRQb2ludC5qYXZhOjE3MCkKCWF0 IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmlvLm5pby5TZWxlY3RDaGFubmVsRW5kUG9pbnQuZmx1c2goU2VsZWN0Q2hh bm5lbEVuZFBvaW50LmphdmE6MjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuSHR0cEdlbmVyYXRv ci5mbHVzaChIdHRwR2VuZXJhdG9yLmphdmE6NzI1KQoJLi4uIDI2IG1vcmUKCjIwMTEtMDUtMTUg MTU6NTA6NDQsOTk1IElORk8gb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyLmNs aWVudHRyYWNlOiBzcmM6IDE5Mi4xNjguMjguMjE0OjUwMDYwLCBkZXN0OiAxOTIuMTY4LjI4LjIx MzozMzQ5MCwgYnl0ZXM6IDEzMTA3Miwgb3A6IE1BUFJFRF9TSFVGRkxFLCBjbGlJRDogYXR0ZW1w dF8yMDExMDUxNDIxMzdfMDAwMV9tXzAwMDM5NF8wLCBkdXJhdGlvbjogMzMyNjAwMDAKMjAxMS0w NS0xNSAxNTo1MDo0NCw5OTUgRVJST1Igb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkubG9nOiAvbWFwT3V0cHV0CmphdmEu bGFuZy5JbGxlZ2FsU3RhdGVFeGNlcHRpb246IENvbW1pdHRlZAoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0 dHkuUmVzcG9uc2UucmVzZXRCdWZmZXIoUmVzcG9uc2UuamF2YToxMDIzKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRi YXkuamV0dHkuUmVzcG9uc2Uuc2VuZEVycm9yKFJlc3BvbnNlLmphdmE6MjQwKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFw YWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFwcmVkLlRhc2tUcmFja2VyJE1hcE91dHB1dFNlcnZsZXQuZG9HZXQoVGFz a1RyYWNrZXIuamF2YTozNzE4KQoJYXQgamF2YXguc2VydmxldC5odHRwLkh0dHBTZXJ2bGV0LnNl cnZpY2UoSHR0cFNlcnZsZXQuamF2YTo3MDcpCglhdCBqYXZheC5zZXJ2bGV0Lmh0dHAuSHR0cFNl cnZsZXQuc2VydmljZShIdHRwU2VydmxldC5qYXZhOjgyMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5 LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5oYW5kbGUoU2VydmxldEhvbGRlci5qYXZhOjUxMSkKCWF0 IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlcnZsZXQuU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIkQ2FjaGVkQ2hhaW4uZG9G aWx0ZXIoU2VydmxldEhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxMjIxKQoJYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AuaHR0 cC5IdHRwU2VydmVyJFF1b3RpbmdJbnB1dEZpbHRlci5kb0ZpbHRlcihIdHRwU2VydmVyLmphdmE6 ODI0KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5TZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlciRDYWNoZWRD aGFpbi5kb0ZpbHRlcihTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjEyMTIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9ydGJheS5q ZXR0eS5zZXJ2bGV0LlNlcnZsZXRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShTZXJ2bGV0SGFuZGxlci5qYXZhOjM5 OSkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LnNlY3VyaXR5LlNlY3VyaXR5SGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUo U2VjdXJpdHlIYW5kbGVyLmphdmE6MjE2KQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuc2VydmxldC5T ZXNzaW9uSGFuZGxlci5oYW5kbGUoU2Vzc2lvbkhhbmRsZXIuamF2YToxODIpCglhdCBvcmcubW9y dGJheS5qZXR0eS5oYW5kbGVyLkNvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyLmhhbmRsZShDb250ZXh0SGFuZGxlci5q YXZhOjc2NikKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LndlYmFwcC5XZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmhhbmRs ZShXZWJBcHBDb250ZXh0LmphdmE6NDUwKQoJYXQgb3JnLm1vcnRiYXkuamV0dHkuaGFuZGxlci5D b250ZXh0SGFuZGxlckNvbGxlY3Rpb24uaGFuZGxlKENvbnRleHRIYW5kbGVyQ29sbGVjdGlvbi5q YXZhOjIzMCkKCWF0IG9yZy5tb3J0YmF5LmpldHR5LmhhbmRsZXIuSGFuZGxlcldyYXBwZXIuaGFu ZGxlKEhhbmRsZXJXcmFwcGVyLmphdmE6MTUyKQo= --_002_ADF94D8555C7A246B86A633685E0178AB90A35CA1Eplanckkasaran_-- From general-return-3549-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:19:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65D6C6087 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56097 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:19:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55883 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55874 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:19:31 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:19:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:19:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:19:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > X represents the set of stable releases. > Y represents the set of available patches. > C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >=20 > So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is = contained in Y, > Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? > It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made = available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... This assumption is probably wrong. It likely wouldn't be hard = to find patches made in Cloudera Hadoop that have been rejected from = Apache Hadoop. I know some of the code in Cloudera Hadoop 2 was = definitely rejected. If Cloudera Hadoop 3's lineage is based upon 2... =09 From general-return-3550-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 18:04:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46C316B7D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29016 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:04:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28960 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28952 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 18:04:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:04:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:03:54 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:03:34 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:03:34 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:03:34 +0200 Subject: Acceptance tests Thread-Topic: Acceptance tests Thread-Index: AcwT85JwHeXJRxetTCmdP3G6Kzlskw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, What acceptance tests are people using when buying clusters for Hadoop? Any= pointers to relevant methods? Thanks, Evert Lammerts= From general-return-3551-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 19:46:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 235456AF1 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5946 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5888 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5879 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 19:46:17 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:46:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:46:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Acceptance tests From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:46:16 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3A2CF811-0C7E-4B05-8DB1-95A4D1FF8ACB@apache.org> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > What acceptance tests are people using when buying clusters for = Hadoop? Any pointers to relevant methods? We get some test nodes from various manufacturers. We do some = raw IO benchmarking vs. our other nodes. We add them to our various = grids to see how they perform real world, paying attn to avg task time = turn around for certain jobs. Since we know where our current machines = are at, we can look at price per perf improvements. Other random things that I think are important: a) Unless someone shares their entire *-site.xml data, = most published benchmarks on the net are mostly useless. Simple things = like block size have a big impact. b) Test your actual workload. Synthetic benchmarks are = just that--synthetic. They may not reflect that particular nuances of = your job. c) Establish a baseline. If you have no hardware today, = then at least establish something on EC2 to compare. d) Make sure you talk to multiple vendors. e) Any advice anyone gives you on config is likely going = to be wrong.= From general-return-3552-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:09:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05EFF6597 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69534 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:09:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69471 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:09:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69463 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:09:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:09:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:09:47 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2096721ewy.35 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr1883894eeh.195.1305580165512; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:09:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:09:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >> X represents the set of stable releases. >> Y represents the set of available patches. >> C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >> >> So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained = in Y, >> Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? >> It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made availabl= e to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This assumption is probably wrong. =A0It likely wouldn't b= e hard to find patches made in Cloudera Hadoop that have been rejected from= Apache Hadoop. =A0I know some of the code in Cloudera Hadoop 2 was definit= ely rejected. =A0If Cloudera Hadoop 3's lineage is based upon 2... Allen, There are few things in Hadoop in CDH that are not in trunk, branch-20-security, or branch-20-append. The stuff in this category is not major (eg HADOOP-6605, better JAVA_HOME detection). One of the things we and others are busy doing is getting the work from CDH3 and 20x (formerly YDH) checked into trunk so a future release won't regress against these 20-based releases. Most projects in CDH are not heavily patched btw, they're close to an upstream Apache release. Hadoop is the exception. https://ccp.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Downloading+CDH+Releases Thanks, Eli From general-return-3553-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:18:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2A1D6B9C for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80884 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80818 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80810 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:18:46 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4GLHwx3041328 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:17:58 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:17:57 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUDrqxSBO3RyeeSueeq1hAW5ouXg== Message-ID: <54800038-3C7F-4D2C-A54B-D7F8A8F7F94F@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_548000383C7F4D2CA54BD7F8A8F7F94Fyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_548000383C7F4D2CA54BD7F8A8F7F94Fyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is protected= by trademark law, and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under copyri= ght law. The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright law= , not trademark law. (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my employer's.= ) Since the Apache License explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term for th= is discussion. However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of control ov= er the name, and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keep our right= s under that law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that we'r= e having this discussion, and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it consi= stently. There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from my = days with Adobe and PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still claim= "compatible with X" as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an "X". B= ut you really need a lawyer to get into that stuff. --Matt On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. The math example is a bit flawed... X represents the set of stable releases. Y represents the set of available patches. C represents the set of Cloudera releases. So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained in = Y, Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made available t= o Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components are = in Apache. (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additional = toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented thei= r changes. Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset, bu= t contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Includes Apac= he Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache Hadoop a= nd then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product is better= .(that's marketing for you...) Clearly there are others out there... Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is on t= he table... But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time con= trolling derivative works... I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential los= s of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and as lo= ng as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I am ob= liged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on the opin= ion of my client... (you know the rest....) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage. Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn't that the definition of a derived work? Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apa= che Hadoop" (including Cloudera). but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order you may end up with a different body of source code...) Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR patent may not apply to such implementations. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is = intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, dis= tribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is str= ictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please= notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of = it from your computer or paper files. --_000_548000383C7F4D2CA54BD7F8A8F7F94Fyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3554-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:25:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA50864D2 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97582 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:25:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97527 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97519 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:25:46 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:25:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:25:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On May 16, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 > Allen, >=20 > There are few things in Hadoop in CDH that are not in trunk, > branch-20-security, or branch-20-append. The stuff in this category > is not major (eg HADOOP-6605, better JAVA_HOME detection). But that's my point: when is it no longer Apache Hadoop? How = major does a change need to be under the line? In the case of CDH2 = and 3, in order to test it out, I actually had to back out some of = Cloudera's "improvements" in order to even test whereas I didn't under = Apache. Is this another place where we only seem to care about APIs and = say to hell with the rest of the stack? From general-return-3555-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:29:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FF9A66BC for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3909 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3859 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3851 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:29:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:29:21 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2103399ewy.35 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.122.81 with SMTP id s57mr1888906eeh.195.1305581340274; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:29:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 16, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> Allen, >> >> There are few things in Hadoop in CDH that are not in trunk, >> branch-20-security, or branch-20-append. =A0The stuff in this category >> is not major (eg HADOOP-6605, better JAVA_HOME detection). > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0But that's my point: =A0when is it no longer Apache Hadoop= ? =A0How major does a change need to be under the line? =A0 =A0In the case = of CDH2 and 3, in order to test it out, I actually had to back out some of = Cloudera's "improvements" in order to even test whereas I didn't under Apac= he. =A0Is this another place where we only seem to care about APIs and say = to hell with the rest of the stack? > I don't think anyone is saying to hell with the rest of the stack, and everyone I've spoken to is on-board with a future release that doesn't require lots of backporting from feature branches. Thanks, Eli From general-return-3556-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:43:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C06D76170 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41342 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41284 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41276 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:43:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:43:16 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=S4N4v3hJ99UIu9m1vR1jWAGJ3sUF5gVnTVk0ACqqR7cfSKiJcZgqaPPE zKA6AzGj3kBZmGfmjjQRFEpknFTXhReMpZWzSR59OUYU+i6qIkv3G/xAh o/8rQp/Rwg0Tc92; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1305582196; x=1337118196; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=y/z7MUEfr/CuhwsCW7yGGIyqQ1oUN4MkRMaTu7ghAbQ=; b=tXBgo/TgDbd9DEPs1Lg0pnmfn+U95g/Zbr34/rUVGg7ggVvaGuk89oLi /NPjecBqKVjNJ7IMYVaeKlStzaKvzOGYgG4dO4nxpx6f17943kZ4F817U ARS13O4CgRMj1z/; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,221,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="23241731" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:42:55 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AQHMDv3EAOfNkuENQUmqX7bDeLVeOZSKwecAgAATHoCAABixAIAAkA6AgABKpYCAAAT/AIAACzIAgAABHgCAA+73AIAAEHMAgABZDoCAAEA+gIAABI8AgAAA6gCAAAPiAA== Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:42:54 +0000 Message-ID: <6E1C9C7A-646A-44A2-9EB0-A11B7291B7B2@linkedin.com> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On May 16, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>=20 >> On May 16, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>=20 >>> Allen, >>>=20 >>> There are few things in Hadoop in CDH that are not in trunk, >>> branch-20-security, or branch-20-append. The stuff in this category >>> is not major (eg HADOOP-6605, better JAVA_HOME detection). >>=20 >> But that's my point: when is it no longer Apache Hadoop? How ma= jor does a change need to be under the line? In the case of CDH2 and 3, = in order to test it out, I actually had to back out some of Cloudera's "imp= rovements" in order to even test whereas I didn't under Apache. Is this an= other place where we only seem to care about APIs and say to hell with the = rest of the stack? >>=20 >=20 > I don't think anyone is saying to hell with the rest of the stack, and > everyone I've spoken to is on-board with a future release that > doesn't require lots of backporting from feature branches. You've missed my point. Does "Hadoop compatibility" and the ability to say "includes Apache Hadoop= " only apply when we're talking about MR and HDFS APIs? = From general-return-3557-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:59:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1370872C6 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88656 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:59:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88599 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88591 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:59:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:59:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:59:36 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so3545770qyk.14 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=laNOSyYp9caSB7NHWWILaHrZAp+/pyZDF2Wf2htXlT0=; b=CLyqT+sYncgPpGPLC0JfQVPyCeWGNl/ctkXlwfJ2wEfOQRAIex2uJnecZJ+/8QWHA0 7SKX8GepmXAYqHvejc3aSLI/jdqLCOridkVyZL7wkV1e3F0BFZvtBaLpJ3eNSJYsOphS rT2CG9MPpELeV5y+osHkrBZdwf7kd9Xd1qYy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=HyMv/ahjYl0FdROfA0P5bOAxGmw8fy30tp1CshkuNuIRFBH4wYSXi9pdUsbFNGRIfW L0zNwzhUl2viNPywQruc+gOA86Xf/ct+BokkyyXfd9GWzwOGDm5q1OI3kmBC7/YIeypS C2gJfzS663jXXiqEGo/CAbKXLjz1yEYXG60gg= Received: by 10.224.195.67 with SMTP id eb3mr3762001qab.324.1305583155610; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.1.246] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm3506368qcs.11.2011.05.16.14.59.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 May 2011 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <6E1C9C7A-646A-44A2-9EB0-A11B7291B7B2@linkedin.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 07:59:10 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> <6E1C9C7A-646A-44A2-9EB0-A11B7291B7B2@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) >=20 > Does "Hadoop compatibility" and the ability to say "includes = Apache Hadoop" only apply when we're talking about MR and HDFS APIs? =20 It is confusing isn't it. We could go down the route java did and say that the API's are 'hadoop' = and ours is just a reference implementation of it. (but others pointed = out, we don't want to become a certification group) Out of curiosity, how good is our test suite in exercising our APIs?=20 Is it sophisticated enough to capture someone adding a = functionality-changing patch (eg the append one). and have it flag it as = a test-failure?=20 From general-return-3558-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:10:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F5346C90 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44108 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44042 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44034 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:10:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:10:17 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so114663bwz.35 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.233.14 with SMTP id jw14mr21453bkb.40.1305590997246; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.37.204 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathon: 5/18 in Palo Alto and San Francisco From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b3979da849ce37704a36d972a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b3979da849ce37704a36d972a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, We've got a great group coming together again on Wednesday for an Apache Hadoop Hackathon in Palo Alto and San Francisco. Sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. As a reminder, we'll have Nigel Daley, the release manager for 0.22, present in Palo Alto. If you have build and release or testing skills and would like to contribute to Apache Hadoop, your skills will be highly valued. Please consider coming out to meet Nigel and help out on that front! Also, there's a Hadoop User Group at Yahoo! in Sunnyvale on Wednesday evening: http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/events/16805258. There will be a large caravan leaving from the Palo Alto Hackathon to attend the HUG, so if you want to Hadoop all day, stop by Palo Alto and join us for the trip south. Regards, Jeff On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks to everyone who came out for the Apache Hadoop Hackathon yesterday > in Palo Alto and San Francisco. We had 35 people sign up from a great cross > section of companies: Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, Apple, Twitter, > Foursquare, AOL, Ngmoco, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, Conviva, and more. We had > committers from the HBase, Hive, Pig, and Oozie projects ensuring their > projects work with the upcoming 0.22 release, and a number of folks got > their first patches up. The 0.22 branch is now being built by Jenkins and > we're in good shape to get a release candidate up soon. > > We had so much fun that we're going to do it again! > > Join us next Wednesday, May 18th, in either San Francisco or Palo Alto, and > help us continue the march to get feature development back on trunk. We'll > have a special guest in Palo Alto: Nigel Daley, Apache Hadoop PMC member and > the release manager for the 0.22 release. If you're a sysadmin or devops > person and want to help us build and test Apache Hadoop, this Hackathon will > be a great chance to learn about how it's done. Of course we'd also love to > have developers looking to get their first patches into Hadoop as well. > > Sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com and we'll see you > Wednesday. > > Regards, > Jeff > > p.s. if you're looking to prepare for the Hackathon, check out the issues > tagged "newbie" at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=labels+%3D+newbie > . > --485b3979da849ce37704a36d972a-- From general-return-3559-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:40:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBEDB6B0C for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77711 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:40:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77668 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77660 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:40:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:40:09 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4H05avC031713 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:05:36 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 1298448A52DF; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:39:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 48vjfnU69p3cH53j; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:39:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4H0dlEu020205; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:39:47 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:39:47 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:40:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUKuv060GtYE4ZSOG5VRabJbnqzw== Message-ID: <1EB061D5-C193-4FC2-85AA-A4C2C8302B8D@navteq.com> References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <54800038-3C7F-4D2C-A54B-D7F8A8F7F94F@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <54800038-3C7F-4D2C-A54B-D7F8A8F7F94F@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. So... what TM protection? :-) You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the = derivative work follows the T&Cs... Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" wrote: > It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is prote= cted by trademark law, > and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under co= pyright law. >=20 > The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright= law, not trademark law. > (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my employe= r's.) Since the Apache License > explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term fo= r this discussion. >=20 > However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of contro= l over the name, > and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our = rights under that > law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that = we're having this discussion, > and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it c= onsistently. >=20 > There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from= my days with Adobe and > PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still c= laim "compatible with X" > as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an "X"= =2E But you really need > a lawyer to get into that stuff. >=20 > --Matt >=20 >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >=20 > But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. >=20 > The math example is a bit flawed... >=20 > X represents the set of stable releases. > Y represents the set of available patches. > C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >=20 > So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained= in Y, > Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? > It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made availab= le to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... >=20 > So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components = are in Apache. > (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additio= nal toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) >=20 > Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. > And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. >=20 > That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented = their changes. > Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS= =2E > So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset= , but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Include= s Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache = Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product= is better.(that's marketing for you...) >=20 > Clearly there are others out there... > Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... >=20 > Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is = on the table... >=20 > But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time= controlling derivative works... > I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential= loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and= as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. >=20 > Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I a= m obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on th= e opinion of my client... > (you know the rest....) >=20 > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >=20 > Mike Segel >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: >=20 > On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >=20 > But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some s= uch > that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage= =2E >=20 > Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >=20 > So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what > happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn= 't > that the definition of a derived work? >=20 >=20 > Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes = Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >=20 >=20 >=20 > but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, > (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a > derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. > Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a > sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different orde= r > you may end up with a different body of source code...) >=20 > Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, > depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look > at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room > implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of > facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may > encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR > patent may not apply to such implementations. >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you ar= e not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminat= ion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conten= ts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in e= rror, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message an= d any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3560-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:07:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05DB66741 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5804 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:07:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5733 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5724 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:07:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of charmalloc@allthingshadoop.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:02 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so29508iwr.35 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.141.20 with SMTP id k20mr21852ibu.132.1305594401650; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.14.141 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [72.88.211.41] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:06:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathon: 5/18 in Palo Alto and San Francisco From: Joe Stein To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6464fc687f71d04a36e62d8 --0016e6464fc687f71d04a36e62d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Any chance for something in the east (NYC) or do I need to start nagging the wife and kids that west coast weather is the way to go? I will post on the NYC HUG maybe we can get some Hack together contrib to Hadoop.... but maybe some evening/day that a few commiters on this list that are in NYC (not sure if there are any based in NYC?) they can run a mini hackathon to help get folks in contrib mode? that would rock! Maybe even some standard type of "Hack @ HUG" that every HUG can do with their users (build, patch, build, deploy, test) if they want... Thanks to all contributors and commiters for your hard work and continued efforts/dedication. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > We've got a great group coming together again on Wednesday for an Apache > Hadoop Hackathon in Palo Alto and San Francisco. Sign up at > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > As a reminder, we'll have Nigel Daley, the release manager for 0.22, > present > in Palo Alto. If you have build and release or testing skills and would > like > to contribute to Apache Hadoop, your skills will be highly valued. Please > consider coming out to meet Nigel and help out on that front! > > Also, there's a Hadoop User Group at Yahoo! in Sunnyvale on Wednesday > evening: http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/events/16805258. There will be a > large > caravan leaving from the Palo Alto Hackathon to attend the HUG, so if you > want to Hadoop all day, stop by Palo Alto and join us for the trip south. > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > Thanks to everyone who came out for the Apache Hadoop Hackathon yesterday > > in Palo Alto and San Francisco. We had 35 people sign up from a great > cross > > section of companies: Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, Apple, Twitter, > > Foursquare, AOL, Ngmoco, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, Conviva, and more. We > had > > committers from the HBase, Hive, Pig, and Oozie projects ensuring their > > projects work with the upcoming 0.22 release, and a number of folks got > > their first patches up. The 0.22 branch is now being built by Jenkins and > > we're in good shape to get a release candidate up soon. > > > > We had so much fun that we're going to do it again! > > > > Join us next Wednesday, May 18th, in either San Francisco or Palo Alto, > and > > help us continue the march to get feature development back on trunk. > We'll > > have a special guest in Palo Alto: Nigel Daley, Apache Hadoop PMC member > and > > the release manager for the 0.22 release. If you're a sysadmin or devops > > person and want to help us build and test Apache Hadoop, this Hackathon > will > > be a great chance to learn about how it's done. Of course we'd also love > to > > have developers looking to get their first patches into Hadoop as well. > > > > Sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com and we'll see you > > Wednesday. > > > > Regards, > > Jeff > > > > p.s. if you're looking to prepare for the Hackathon, check out the issues > > tagged "newbie" at > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=labels+%3D+newbie > > . > > > -- /* Joe Stein http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc Twitter: @allthingshadoop */ --0016e6464fc687f71d04a36e62d8-- From general-return-3561-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D10F9697E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12183 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12134 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12126 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:12:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:12:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott@richrelevance.com designates 64.78.17.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.78.17.19] (HELO EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:12:20 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.19]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:59 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:12:22 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUL2s7rmbwhQEvRESvHXsJsF+fKw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1EB061D5-C193-4FC2-85AA-A4C2C8302B8D@navteq.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of the stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even if Hadoop alone isn't. "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the community (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. But "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? Is there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution for Apache Hadoop. On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" wrote: >I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. >So... what TM protection? :-) > >You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the >derivative work follows the T&Cs... > > > >Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > >Mike Segel > >On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" wrote: > >> It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is >>protected by trademark law, >> and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under >>copyright law. >>=20 >> The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright >>law, not trademark law. >> (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my >>employer's.) Since the Apache License >> explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term >>for this discussion. >>=20 >> However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of >>control over the name, >> and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our >>rights under that >> law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that >>we're having this discussion, >> and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it >>consistently. >>=20 >> There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from >>my days with Adobe and >> PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still >>claim "compatible with X" >> as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an >>"X". But you really need >> a lawyer to get into that stuff. >>=20 >> --Matt >>=20 >>=20 >> On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >>=20 >> But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. >>=20 >> The math example is a bit flawed... >>=20 >> X represents the set of stable releases. >> Y represents the set of available patches. >> C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >>=20 >> So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained >>in Y, >> Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? >> It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made >>available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... >>=20 >> So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components >>are in Apache. >> (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's >>additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) >>=20 >> Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. >> And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. >>=20 >> That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented >>their changes. >> Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. >> So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete >>subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say >>'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based >>on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion >>their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) >>=20 >> Clearly there are others out there... >> Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... >>=20 >> Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is >>on the table... >>=20 >> But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time >>controlling derivative works... >> I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential >>loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and >>as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. >>=20 >> Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I >>am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on >>the opinion of my client... >> (you know the rest....) >>=20 >> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>=20 >> Mike Segel >>=20 >> On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>> wrote: >>=20 >> On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>=20 >> On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>=20 >> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some >>such >> that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage. >>=20 >> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >>=20 >> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what >> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And >>isn't >> that the definition of a derived work? >>=20 >>=20 >> Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes >>Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, >> (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a >> derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. >> Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a >> sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order >> you may end up with a different body of source code...) >>=20 >> Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, >> depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look >> at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room >> implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of >> facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may >> encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR >> patent may not apply to such implementations. >>=20 >>=20 >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and >>is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you >>are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of >>its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the >>original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >>=20 > > >The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and >is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are >not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of >its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the >original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3562-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:50:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E5836A00 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36944 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36881 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:50:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36873 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:50:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:50:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:50:53 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4H1oWH4027188 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:32 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 382B13DE90C1; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com ([10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id TubBt7ggt2Ro6nuG; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4H1oWNe024968; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:32 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%13]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:31 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:50:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUNM2FOGATVu6GQTaVLC2hgNCHzw== Message-ID: <938B2F6A-CC9F-41C3-8EC7-E5FD048AEA26@navteq.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Let me clarify... I searched on Hadoop as a term in any TM.=20 Nothing came back... This means that Apache Hadoop didn't show up. Note the following: I did the basic search. I wouldn't be surprised that = someone from Apache comes back and says see TM xxxxxxxx ... -Mike Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache > Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of = the > stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even = if > Hadoop alone isn't. > "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough > guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the communi= ty > (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. B= ut > "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? = Is > there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of th= e > guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution = for > Apache Hadoop. >=20 > On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" wrote: >=20 >> I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. >> So... what TM protection? :-) >>=20 >> You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as t= he >> derivative work follows the T&Cs... >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>=20 >> Mike Segel >>=20 >> On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" wro= te: >>=20 >>> It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is >>> protected by trademark law, >>> and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under >>> copyright law. >>>=20 >>> The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyrig= ht >>> law, not trademark law. >>> (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my >>> employer's.) Since the Apache License >>> explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term >>> for this discussion. >>>=20 >>> However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of >>> control over the name, >>> and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps ou= r >>> rights under that >>> law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good tha= t >>> we're having this discussion, >>> and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it >>> consistently. >>>=20 >>> There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly fr= om >>> my days with Adobe and >>> PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still >>> claim "compatible with X" >>> as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an >>> "X". But you really need >>> a lawyer to get into that stuff. >>>=20 >>> --Matt >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >>>=20 >>> But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. >>>=20 >>> The math example is a bit flawed... >>>=20 >>> X represents the set of stable releases. >>> Y represents the set of available patches. >>> C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >>>=20 >>> So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contain= ed >>> in Y, >>> Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? >>> It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made >>> available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release.= =2E. >>>=20 >>> So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's component= s >>> are in Apache. >>> (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's >>> additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) >>>=20 >>> Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. >>> And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. >>>=20 >>> That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemente= d >>> their changes. >>> Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HD= FS. >>> So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete >>> subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't sa= y >>> 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work base= d >>> on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion >>> their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) >>>=20 >>> Clearly there are others out there... >>> Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... >>>=20 >>> Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money i= s >>> on the table... >>>=20 >>> But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard ti= me >>> controlling derivative works... >>> I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potenti= al >>> loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open = and >>> as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. >>>=20 >>> Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I >>> am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect = on >>> the opinion of my client... >>> (you know the rest....) >>>=20 >>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>>=20 >>> Mike Segel >>>=20 >>> On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>> > wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>=20 >>> On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>=20 >>> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some >>> such >>> that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usa= ge. >>>=20 >>> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >>>=20 >>> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of wh= at >>> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And >>> isn't >>> that the definition of a derived work? >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes >>> Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, >>> (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a >>> derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superse= t. >>> Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a >>> sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different or= der >>> you may end up with a different body of source code...) >>>=20 >>> Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, >>> depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could loo= k >>> at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room >>> implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of >>> facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may >>> encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their = MR >>> patent may not apply to such implementations. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL a= nd >>> is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you >>> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any= of >>> its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy t= he >>> original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files= =2E >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL an= d >> is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you = are >> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any = of >> its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy th= e >> original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3563-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:53:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94BCA6A4F for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40063 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:53:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39998 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:53:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39989 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:53:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:53:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:52:59 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so34058pve.35 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.3.139 with SMTP id c11mr151693pbc.277.1305597157063; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:52:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.62.230 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:52:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DCCF172.5010504@apache.org> <99AB77CF-025E-4E4A-BD7F-BDA362E633BF@apache.org> <4DCDA8E7.5090809@apache.org> <2ED3A7F5-E549-4545-9395-094A10EA4EED@apache.org> <4DD10420.7060004@apache.org> <434E417B-C21F-4649-9D72-4E6DCA558C18@apache.org> <6E1C9C7A-646A-44A2-9EB0-A11B7291B7B2@linkedin.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:52:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uFckeOqvaYXIhblhlWaG3O7N2ZQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We have the following method coverage: Common ~60% HDFS ~80% MR ~70% (better analysis will be available after our projects are connected to Sonar, I think). While method coverage isn't completely adequate answer to your question, I'd say there is a possibility to sneak in some semantical and even API changes which might go entirely unvalidated by the test suites. It isn't very high, but it does exist. A better approach to validate semantics is to run cluster tests (e.g. system tests) which have a better potentials to exercise public APIs than functional tests. There's HADOOP-7278 to address this for 0.22 (and potentially others) -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 14:59, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Does "Hadoop compatibility" and the ability to say "includes= Apache Hadoop" only apply when we're talking about MR and HDFS APIs? > > > It is confusing isn't it. > > We could go down the route java did and say that the API's are 'hadoop' a= nd ours is just a reference implementation of it. (but others pointed out, = we don't want to become a certification group) > > Out of curiosity, how good is our test suite in exercising our APIs? > Is it sophisticated enough to capture someone adding a functionality-chan= ging patch (eg the append one). and have it flag it as a test-failure? > > From general-return-3564-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:33:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248804322 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66565 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:33:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66506 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:33:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66498 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:33:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:33:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:33:21 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4H2Wmkf067966; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32:48 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Matthew Foley Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32:36 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUOrWd4eLrbM55Qmmy70FDIxobXQ== Message-ID: <3CF0B8B5-2146-4E26-9F44-C012A5DFB7A5@yahoo-inc.com> References: <938B2F6A-CC9F-41C3-8EC7-E5FD048AEA26@navteq.com> In-Reply-To: <938B2F6A-CC9F-41C3-8EC7-E5FD048AEA26@navteq.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 My understanding is that a history if defending your trade mark is more imp= ortant than registration. Apache does defend Hadoop.=20 --- E14 - typing on glass On May 16, 2011, at 6:52 PM, "Segel, Mike" wrote: > Let me clarify... > I searched on Hadoop as a term in any TM.=20 > Nothing came back... >=20 > This means that Apache Hadoop didn't show up. >=20 > Note the following: I did the basic search. I wouldn't be surprised that = someone from Apache comes back and says see TM xxxxxxxx ... >=20 > -Mike >=20 > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >=20 > Mike Segel >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: >=20 >> On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache >> Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of t= he >> stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even i= f >> Hadoop alone isn't. >> "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough >> guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the communit= y >> (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. Bu= t >> "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? = Is >> there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the >> guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution f= or >> Apache Hadoop. >>=20 >> On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" wrote: >>=20 >>> I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. >>> So... what TM protection? :-) >>>=20 >>> You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as th= e >>> derivative work follows the T&Cs... >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>>=20 >>> Mike Segel >>>=20 >>> On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" wrot= e: >>>=20 >>>> It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is >>>> protected by trademark law, >>>> and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under >>>> copyright law. >>>>=20 >>>> The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyrigh= t >>>> law, not trademark law. >>>> (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my >>>> employer's.) Since the Apache License >>>> explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term >>>> for this discussion. >>>>=20 >>>> However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of >>>> control over the name, >>>> and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our >>>> rights under that >>>> law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that >>>> we're having this discussion, >>>> and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it >>>> consistently. >>>>=20 >>>> There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly fro= m >>>> my days with Adobe and >>>> PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still >>>> claim "compatible with X" >>>> as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an >>>> "X". But you really need >>>> a lawyer to get into that stuff. >>>>=20 >>>> --Matt >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. >>>>=20 >>>> The math example is a bit flawed... >>>>=20 >>>> X represents the set of stable releases. >>>> Y represents the set of available patches. >>>> C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >>>>=20 >>>> So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is containe= d >>>> in Y, >>>> Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? >>>> It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made >>>> available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release..= . >>>>=20 >>>> So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components >>>> are in Apache. >>>> (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's >>>> additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) >>>>=20 >>>> Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. >>>> And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. >>>>=20 >>>> That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented >>>> their changes. >>>> Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDF= S. >>>> So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete >>>> subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say >>>> 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based >>>> on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion >>>> their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) >>>>=20 >>>> Clearly there are others out there... >>>> Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... >>>>=20 >>>> Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is >>>> on the table... >>>>=20 >>>> But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard tim= e >>>> controlling derivative works... >>>> I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potentia= l >>>> loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open a= nd >>>> as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. >>>>=20 >>>> Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I >>>> am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect o= n >>>> the opinion of my client... >>>> (you know the rest....) >>>>=20 >>>> Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >>>>=20 >>>> Mike Segel >>>>=20 >>>> On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" >>>> > wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some >>>> such >>>> that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usag= e. >>>>=20 >>>> Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >>>>=20 >>>> So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of wha= t >>>> happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And >>>> isn't >>>> that the definition of a derived work? >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes >>>> Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, >>>> (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a >>>> derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset= . >>>> Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a >>>> sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different ord= er >>>> you may end up with a different body of source code...) >>>>=20 >>>> Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, >>>> depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look >>>> at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room >>>> implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of >>>> facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may >>>> encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their M= R >>>> patent may not apply to such implementations. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL an= d >>>> is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you >>>> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any = of >>>> its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>>> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy th= e >>>> original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and >>> is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you a= re >>> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any o= f >>> its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the >>> original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >>=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are no= t the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, d= istribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is s= trictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, plea= se notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy o= f it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3565-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:53:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E43084EAE for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74896 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:53:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74842 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74834 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:53:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:53:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.216] (HELO nm21-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:52:54 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.190] by nm21.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2011 02:52:33 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.159] by tm3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2011 02:52:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 May 2011 02:52:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 660526.74064.bm@omp1042.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 8002 invoked by uid 60001); 17 May 2011 02:52:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1305600753; bh=aD0X+/2RFVpJLGMKwWeftiP4tjcj7KxhGUQilTpVxl4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5bsN2VDFoe1Okx56ITtx/2ZWV0EcrynHcLLxFwFhQGM5FsJfwbMT9JY5x1u14qicLnkkvYl4x+2J1axSh9LrQywmn3ELux7Hu8sOSMTnaxcZiIaMb93Nmlw1UjkEeqff2pRLAg4hga23db+eqh7vwlJJoh6O2cpFxjbxN3mYtcs= Message-ID: <477039.7995.qm@web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4sYWDZsVM1nvSRHQUrWvA_vzA2mEJpHbuhi9pMrEpZpY1xS SOcwHSgqObYpmlPMcSV5vhkn.8D4JusGgSvb0HSSPI1SFv19PGMx47NFwMFA .2so1I.JnRDbrYOqdkw5L3nzYziiERi8IhU6XoX8iATCcukE2GQkinVQc26F fiTtRcd.DyixX7vz3xkjoTtn7GsjzXi6VWvFXku13twVgqHQ3WMiVVwCxY.N DMvB.Vp68Ztn0nKM3p.zGafcxfacP5L8rTvtRrpI39W09MXSUXLSOssyvflJ QT9G59N5OkhHGhTaWj4C0G8ULRekZhFX0e_gxJ5twegORgrOBVgZRqTk5Ah4 aEyP1CoGsqfXnXnZShPSY08d0BVLqrSCpBJXiAF8FuokH4UA07tmoWrVEROV vyW1ZBudWsc9ZhQ-- Received: from [220.135.41.196] by web65506.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:52:33 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:52:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Matthew Foley In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache=0A> H= adoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that=0A> replaces most of t= he stack. [...] A proprietary derivative work with=0A> most of the guts rep= laced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor=0A> a distribution for Apac= he Hadoop.=0A=0AIMHO, this is the key issue. Allowing proprietary derivativ= e works that provide Hadoop compatible APIs to claim they are Hadoop will p= rovoke endless confusion, argument, claim, and counter-claim, and poison th= e well for all involved with Apache Hadoop.=0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A - A= ndy=0A=0AProblems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Pie= t Hein (via Tom White)=0A=0A=0A--- On Mon, 5/16/11, Scott Carey wrote:=0A=0A> From: Scott Carey =0A= > Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting-=0A> To: "general@= hadoop.apache.org" =0A> Cc: "Matthew Foley" =0A> Date: Monday, May 16, 2011, 6:12 PM=0A> On trademarks= , what about the phrase:=A0 "New distribution for Apache=0A> Hadoop"?=A0 I'= ve seen that used, and its something that replaces most=0A> of the stack.= =A0 I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this=0A> context, even if H= adoop alone isn't. "Compatible with Apache Hadoop"=0A> is a smaller issue, = defining some rough guidelines for various forms=0A> of compatibility is us= eful for the community (and reputable vendors),=0A> abuse of that will at l= east become obvious.=A0 But "distribution for=0A> Apache Hadoop" (not too s= ure what 'for' means here)?=A0 Is there any=0A> TM protection?=A0 A proprie= tary derivative work with most of the=0A> guts replaced is not an Apache Ha= doop distribution, nor a=0A> distribution for Apache Hadoop.=0A> =0A> On 5/= 16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" =0A> wrote:=0A> =0A> >I jus= t checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop.=0A> >So... what TM protect= ion? :-)=0A> >=0A> >You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot=0A>= point as long as the=0A> >derivative work follows the T&Cs...=0A> >=0A> >= =0A> >=0A> >Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos...=0A> >=0A>= >Mike Segel=0A> >=0A> >On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" =0A> wrote:=0A> >=0A> >> It's important to distinguish betwe= en the name=0A> "Hadoop", which is=0A> >>protected by trademark law,=0A> >>= and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed=0A> as opensource under= =0A> >>copyright law.=0A> >> =0A> >> The term "derivative work" is, I belie= ve, only=0A> relevant under copyright=0A> >>law, not trademark law.=0A> >> = (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my=0A> opinion, not my=0A> >>e= mployer's.)=A0 Since the Apache License=0A> >> explicitly allows derivative= works, I don't think=0A> it's a useful term=0A> >>for this discussion.=0A>= >> =0A> >> However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop=0A> PMC, has a l= ot of=0A> >>control over the name,=0A> >> and how we allow it to be used, u= nder trademark=0A> law.=A0 But to keeps our=0A> >>rights under that=0A> >> = law, we have to enforce the trademark=0A> consistently.=A0 So it's good tha= t=0A> >>we're having this discussion,=0A> >> and it's important to reach a = conclusion, document=0A> it, and enforce it=0A> >>consistently.=0A> >> =0A>= >> There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I=0A> recall correctly = from=0A> >>my days with Adobe and=0A> >> PostScript(R), someone who has not= licensed a=0A> trademark "X" can still=0A> >>claim "compatible with X"=0A>= >> as long as they ALSO make clear that the product=0A> is NOT, itself, an= =0A> >>"X".=A0 But you really need=0A> >> a lawyer to get into that stuff.= =0A> >> =0A> >> --Matt=0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, = Segel, Mike wrote:=0A> >> =0A> >> But Cloudera's release is a bit murky.=0A= > >> =0A> >> The math example is a bit flawed...=0A> >> =0A> >> X represent= s the set of stable releases.=0A> >> Y represents the set of available patc= hes.=0A> >> C represents the set of Cloudera releases.=0A> >> =0A> >> So if= C contains a release X(n) plus a set of=0A> patches that is contained=0A> = >>in Y,=0A> >> Then does it not have the right to be considered=0A> Apache = Hadoop?=0A> >> It's my understanding is that any enhancement to=0A> Hadoop = is made=0A> >>available to Apache and will eventually make it=0A> into a la= ter release...=0A> >> =0A> >> So while it may not be 'official' release X(z= ),=0A> all of it's components=0A> >>are in Apache.=0A> >> (note: I'm talkin= g about the core components and=0A> not Cloudera's=0A> >>additional toolset= s that encompass Hadoop.)=0A> >> =0A> >> Cloudera is clearly a derivative w= ork.=0A> >> And IMHO is the only one which can say ...=0A> 'Includes Apache= Hadoop'.=0A> >> =0A> >> That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on= =0A> how they implemented=0A> >>their changes.=0A> >> Based on EMC marketin= g material, they've done a=0A> rip and replace of HDFS.=0A> >> So it wouldn= 't be a superset since it doesn't=0A> contain a complete=0A> >>subset, but = contains code that implements the=0A> API... So they can't say=0A> >>'Inclu= des Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a=0A> derivative work based=0A> >>= on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and=0A> why, in their opinion= =0A> >>their product is better.(that's marketing for=0A> you...)=0A> >> =0A= > >> Clearly there are others out there...=0A> >> Hadoop on Cassandra as an= example...=0A> >> =0A> >> Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's=0A> ine= vitable. Too much money is=0A> >>on the table...=0A> >> =0A> >> But because= Apache's licensing is so open, Apache=0A> will have a hard time=0A> >>cont= rolling derivative works...=0A> >> I believe that Steve is incorrect in his= assertion=0A> concerning potential=0A> >>loss of any patent protection. Ag= ain Apache's=0A> licensing is very open and=0A> >>as long as they follow Ap= ache's Ts and Cs, they are=0A> covered.=0A> >> =0A> >> Note: because I am s= ending this from my email=0A> address at my client, I=0A> >>am obliged to s= ay that this email is my opinion and=0A> does not reflect on=0A> >>the opin= ion of my client...=0A> >> (you know the rest....)=0A> >> =0A> >> Sent from= a remote device. Please excuse any=0A> typos...=0A> >> =0A> >> Mike Segel= =0A> >> =0A> >> On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran"=0A> >>>=0A> wrote:=0A> >> =0A> >> On 13/05/1= 1 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote:=0A> >> =0A> >> On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM= , Ted Dunning wrote:=0A> >> =0A> >> But "distribution Z includes X" kind of= implies=0A> the existence of some=0A> >>such=0A> >> that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D = empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least=0A> in common usage.=0A> >> =0A> >> Isn't= that the same as a non-trunk change?=0A> >> =0A> >> So doesn't this mean t= hat your question reduces to=0A> the question of what=0A> >> happens when n= on-Apache changes are made to an=0A> Apache release?=A0 And=0A> >>isn't=0A>= >> that the definition of a derived work?=0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >>=A0 Yup. W= hich is why I doubt *any* commercial=0A> entity can claim "includes=0A> >>A= pache Hadoop" (including Cloudera).=0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> but they= can claim it is a derivative work, which=0A> CDH clearly is,=0A> >> (Thoug= h if we were to come up with a formal=0A> declaration of what a=0A> >> deri= vative work is, we'd have to handle the fact=0A> that it is a superset.=0A>= >> Even worse, you may realise a release is the=0A> ordered application of= a=0A> >> sequence of patches, and if the patches are=0A> applied in a diff= erent order=0A> >> you may end up with a different body of source=0A> code.= ..)=0A> >> =0A> >> Something that implements the APIs may not be a=0A> deri= vative work,=0A> >> depending on how much of the original code is in=0A> th= ere. You could look=0A> >> at the base classes and interfaces and produce a= =0A> clean room=0A> >> implementation (relying on the notion that=0A> inter= faces are a list of=0A> >> facts and not copyrightable in the US), but=0A> = whoever does that may=0A> >> encounter the issue that Google's donation of = the=0A> right to use their MR=0A> >> patent may not apply to such implement= ations.=0A> >> =0A> >> =0A> >> The information contained in this communicat= ion=0A> may be CONFIDENTIAL and=0A> >>is intended only for the use of the r= ecipient(s)=0A> named above.=A0 If you=0A> >>are not the intended recipient= , you are hereby=0A> notified that any=0A> >>dissemination, distribution, o= r copying of this=0A> communication, or any of=0A> >>its contents, is stric= tly prohibited.=A0 If you=0A> have received this=0A> >>communication in err= or, please notify the sender=0A> and delete/destroy the=0A> >>original mess= age and any copy of it from your=0A> computer or paper files.=0A> >> =0A> >= =0A> >=0A> >The information contained in this communication may be=0A> CONF= IDENTIAL and=0A> >is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named=0A= > above.=A0 If you are=0A> >not the intended recipient, you are hereby noti= fied=0A> that any=0A> >dissemination, distribution, or copying of this=0A> = communication, or any of=0A> >its contents, is strictly prohibited.=A0 If y= ou have=0A> received this=0A> >communication in error, please notify the se= nder and=0A> delete/destroy the=0A> >original message and any copy of it fr= om your computer=0A> or paper files.=0A> =0A> From general-return-3566-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:20:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B74F4886 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15253 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15182 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15174 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:20:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:20:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:20:31 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p4H9JHaZ009919 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:19:17 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:19:08 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUc36MXcEeGdVESJyEZQQeYplkIg== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CA18BF37B8924E059BCA44AE1B290604yahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_CA18BF37B8924E059BCA44AE1B290604yahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TESS only has "registered" trademarks -- that's the kind of trademark you p= ut an "(R)" next to. But you can have an ordinary unregistered trademark -- the kind you put a "= tm" next to -- just by claiming it, and then promoting and defending it. In the second paragraph of our bylaws= we claim: The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyright= on Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. In the LICENSE.txt file in our distribution, clause 6 of the Apache License= states, 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trad= e names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. Very important! This exclusion of trademarks from the opensource license i= s normal and appropriate, precisely because it is the primary tool for preventing co= nfusion and fragmentation in an opensource marketplace. However, we also have to promote and defend the trademark. I'll leave it u= p to the lawyers to define exactly what that means, but it does take some effort. W= e should probably use the "tm" annotation in our logo GIFs and our primary market-fa= cing documents (not so much in the code). Perhaps the PMC or Apache Board can a= sk some of our sponsor organizations to help out with some techdocs and trademark l= egal review assistance. It's not really a topic for us lay people to argue over, it ju= st wastes time. WRT Scott's comments below, understand that trademark lawyers love to talk = about using trademarks only as "modifiers", i.e., essentially as adjectives. We should= n't say "Chevrolet" as a thing, we should say "Chevrolet (tm) cars". There are many kinds of c= ars, and "Chevrolet" is a mark distinguishing THIS kind of car from the others. You can't trade= mark THINGS, you can only trademark DISTINGUISHING MARKS that differentiate things in the ma= rketplace. And it has nothing to do with the underlying technology. So here are three statements I believe to be true: 1. We should defend against the usage "Apache Hadoop", "Cloudera Hadoop", "Yahoo Hadoop", and "EMC Hadoop". This would imply that Hadoop was a THING= , and those other words -- all trademarks! -- are the modifiers. Not accepta= ble. 2. If the PMC chooses to, it is okay to allow usages like "Cloudera distrib= ution of Hadoop", "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop", and "EMC distribution of Hadoop", = or even "powered by Hadoop", "built on Hadoop", "Hadoop inside", or whatever, where "Hadoop" is understood to mean "Hadoop distributed computing platform" (as opposed to other kinds of distributed computing platform product). ALL of those usages are claiming to "be Hadoop" in some sense, so they are protected by the trademark on "Hadoop". Therefore, they can only be used i= f each of those companies obtain a license from Apache to use the Hadoop trademark= , which should include an agreement about correct use of the mark. And curre= ntly they DON'T have such a license, because the Apache License specifically exc= ludes trademarks! 3. If other companies choose to sell distributed computing platform product= s that are NOT named "Hadoop", but their marketing literature says these products = are "compatible with Hadoop" while also making clear that they are not Hadoop a= nd don't claim to be Hadoop -- we probably can't do anything about it. Claims= of compatibility are generally protected for the sake of competition in the ma= rketplace. If We-The-Community can come to an agreement about what compatibility means= , we can build it into the license to use the "Hadoop" trademark (as in #2 ab= ove), then enforce it with peer pressure and market rejection of non-conforming produc= ts (#3). But the only real help from the law will be in distinguishing case #2 from = case #3. --Matt "I am not a lawyer, the above is just my opinion, and does not represent th= e opinion of my employer." On May 16, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of the stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even if Hadoop alone isn't. "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the community (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. But "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? Is there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution for Apache Hadoop. On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" > wrote: I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. So... what TM protection? :-) You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the derivative work follows the T&Cs... Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" > wrote: It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is protected by trademark law, and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under copyright law. The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright law, not trademark law. (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my employer's.) Since the Apache License explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term for this discussion. However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of control over the name, and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our rights under that law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that we're having this discussion, and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it consistently. There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from my days with Adobe and PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still claim "compatible with X" as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an "X". But you really need a lawyer to get into that stuff. --Matt On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. The math example is a bit flawed... X represents the set of stable releases. Y represents the set of available patches. C represents the set of Cloudera releases. So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained in Y, Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components are in Apache. (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented their changes. Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) Clearly there are others out there... Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is on the table... But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time controlling derivative works... I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on the opinion of my client... (you know the rest....) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage. Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn't that the definition of a derived work? Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order you may end up with a different body of source code...) Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR patent may not apply to such implementations. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. --_000_CA18BF37B8924E059BCA44AE1B290604yahooinccom_-- From general-return-3567-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 12:53:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B28E4915 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78097 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 12:53:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78042 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 12:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78034 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 12:53:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:53:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:53:01 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p4HCqdSx032437 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:40 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 8F39F4425A0B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 5MsrP6QHvAfbEJcO for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p4HCqdNe002614 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:39 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::c4dd:7b21:5c22:cfe4]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:39 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 07:52:37 -0500 Subject: RE: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUc36MXcEeGdVESJyEZQQeYplkIgAHIjdw Message-ID: <3798688F8784154192FDA3388F4C2081D59C0C@hq-ex-mb03.ad.navteq.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well that would explain it, although Apache itself is a Registered Trade = Mark. I agree you need to step up the enforcement because you don't want Hadoop= to become the next Kleenex... :-) -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Foley [mailto:mattf@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:19 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Matthew Foley Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- TESS only has "registered" trademarks -- that's the kind of trademark you= put an "(R)" next to. But you can have an ordinary unregistered trademark -- the kind you put a= "tm" next to -- just by claiming it, and then promoting and defending it. In the second paragraph of our bylaws we claim: The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyrig= ht on Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. In the LICENSE.txt file in our distribution, clause 6 of the Apache Licen= se states, 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the tr= ade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing t= he origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. Very important! This exclusion of trademarks from the opensource license= is normal and appropriate, precisely because it is the primary tool for preventing = confusion and fragmentation in an opensource marketplace. However, we also have to promote and defend the trademark. I'll leave it= up to the lawyers to define exactly what that means, but it does take some effort. = We should probably use the "tm" annotation in our logo GIFs and our primary market-= facing documents (not so much in the code). Perhaps the PMC or Apache Board can= ask some of our sponsor organizations to help out with some techdocs and trademark= legal review assistance. It's not really a topic for us lay people to argue over, it = just wastes time. WRT Scott's comments below, understand that trademark lawyers love to tal= k about using trademarks only as "modifiers", i.e., essentially as adjectives. We shou= ldn't say "Chevrolet" as a thing, we should say "Chevrolet (tm) cars". There are many kinds of= cars, and "Chevrolet" is a mark distinguishing THIS kind of car from the others. You can't tra= demark THINGS, you can only trademark DISTINGUISHING MARKS that differentiate things in the = marketplace. And it has nothing to do with the underlying technology. So here are three statements I believe to be true: 1. We should defend against the usage "Apache Hadoop", "Cloudera Hadoop", "Yahoo Hadoop", and "EMC Hadoop". This would imply that Hadoop was a THI= NG, and those other words -- all trademarks! -- are the modifiers. Not accep= table. 2. If the PMC chooses to, it is okay to allow usages like "Cloudera distr= ibution of Hadoop", "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop", and "EMC distribution of Hadoop"= , or even "powered by Hadoop", "built on Hadoop", "Hadoop inside", or whatever, whe= re "Hadoop" is understood to mean "Hadoop distributed computing platform" (as opposed to other kinds of distributed computing platform product). ALL of those usages are claiming to "be Hadoop" in some sense, so they ar= e protected by the trademark on "Hadoop". Therefore, they can only be used= if each of those companies obtain a license from Apache to use the Hadoop tradema= rk, which should include an agreement about correct use of the mark. And cur= rently they DON'T have such a license, because the Apache License specifically e= xcludes trademarks! 3. If other companies choose to sell distributed computing platform produ= cts that are NOT named "Hadoop", but their marketing literature says these product= s are "compatible with Hadoop" while also making clear that they are not Hadoop= and don't claim to be Hadoop -- we probably can't do anything about it. Clai= ms of compatibility are generally protected for the sake of competition in the = marketplace. If We-The-Community can come to an agreement about what compatibility mea= ns, we can build it into the license to use the "Hadoop" trademark (as in #2 = above), then enforce it with peer pressure and market rejection of non-conforming prod= ucts (#3). But the only real help from the law will be in distinguishing case #2 fro= m case #3. --Matt "I am not a lawyer, the above is just my opinion, and does not represent = the opinion of my employer." On May 16, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of th= e stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even if Hadoop alone isn't. "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the community (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. But "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? I= s there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution fo= r Apache Hadoop. On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" > wrote: I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. So... what TM protection? :-) You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the derivative work follows the T&Cs... Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" > wrote: It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is protected by trademark law, and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under copyright law. The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright law, not trademark law. (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my employer's.) Since the Apache License explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term for this discussion. However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of control over the name, and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our rights under that law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that we're having this discussion, and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it consistently. There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from my days with Adobe and PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still claim "compatible with X" as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an "X". But you really need a lawyer to get into that stuff. --Matt On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. The math example is a bit flawed... X represents the set of stable releases. Y represents the set of available patches. C represents the set of Cloudera releases. So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained in Y, Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components are in Apache. (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented their changes. Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) Clearly there are others out there... Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is on the table... But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time controlling derivative works... I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on the opinion of my client... (you know the rest....) Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... Mike Segel On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some such that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage. Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And isn't that the definition of a derived work? Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order you may end up with a different body of source code...) Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR patent may not apply to such implementations. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-3568-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 13:24:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0E764F5A for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35709 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:24:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35651 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35642 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 13:24:49 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:24:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.168.248.176]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:24:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4DD2770E.2080204@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:24:30 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matt, Have you read Apache's trademark policy page? http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ Apache does not generally license its trademarks. Constructions like, "Acme Foo powered by Apache Bar" are generally permitted as they are not deemed to create confusion about the origin of Bar. Cheers, Doug On 05/17/2011 11:19 AM, Matthew Foley wrote: > TESS only has "registered" trademarks -- that's the kind of trademark you put an "(R)" next to. > But you can have an ordinary unregistered trademark -- the kind you put a "tm" next to -- > just by claiming it, and then promoting and defending it. > > In the second paragraph of our bylaws we claim: > The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyright on > Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. > In the LICENSE.txt file in our distribution, clause 6 of the Apache License states, > 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade > names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, > except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the > origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. > Very important! This exclusion of trademarks from the opensource license is normal > and appropriate, precisely because it is the primary tool for preventing confusion and > fragmentation in an opensource marketplace. > > However, we also have to promote and defend the trademark. I'll leave it up to the > lawyers to define exactly what that means, but it does take some effort. We should > probably use the "tm" annotation in our logo GIFs and our primary market-facing > documents (not so much in the code). Perhaps the PMC or Apache Board can ask some > of our sponsor organizations to help out with some techdocs and trademark legal review > assistance. It's not really a topic for us lay people to argue over, it just wastes time. > > WRT Scott's comments below, understand that trademark lawyers love to talk about using > trademarks only as "modifiers", i.e., essentially as adjectives. We shouldn't say "Chevrolet" > as a thing, we should say "Chevrolet (tm) cars". There are many kinds of cars, and "Chevrolet" > is a mark distinguishing THIS kind of car from the others. You can't trademark THINGS, you > can only trademark DISTINGUISHING MARKS that differentiate things in the marketplace. > And it has nothing to do with the underlying technology. > > So here are three statements I believe to be true: > > 1. We should defend against the usage "Apache Hadoop", "Cloudera Hadoop", > "Yahoo Hadoop", and "EMC Hadoop". This would imply that Hadoop was a THING, > and those other words -- all trademarks! -- are the modifiers. Not acceptable. > > 2. If the PMC chooses to, it is okay to allow usages like "Cloudera distribution of > Hadoop", "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop", and "EMC distribution of Hadoop", or even > "powered by Hadoop", "built on Hadoop", "Hadoop inside", or whatever, where > "Hadoop" is understood to mean "Hadoop distributed computing platform" > (as opposed to other kinds of distributed computing platform product). > ALL of those usages are claiming to "be Hadoop" in some sense, so they are > protected by the trademark on "Hadoop". Therefore, they can only be used if each > of those companies obtain a license from Apache to use the Hadoop trademark, > which should include an agreement about correct use of the mark. And currently > they DON'T have such a license, because the Apache License specifically excludes > trademarks! > > 3. If other companies choose to sell distributed computing platform products that > are NOT named "Hadoop", but their marketing literature says these products are > "compatible with Hadoop" while also making clear that they are not Hadoop and > don't claim to be Hadoop -- we probably can't do anything about it. Claims of > compatibility are generally protected for the sake of competition in the marketplace. > > If We-The-Community can come to an agreement about what compatibility means, > we can build it into the license to use the "Hadoop" trademark (as in #2 above), then > enforce it with peer pressure and market rejection of non-conforming products (#3). > But the only real help from the law will be in distinguishing case #2 from case #3. > > --Matt > "I am not a lawyer, the above is just my opinion, and does not represent the opinion of my employer." > > > On May 16, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > > On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache > Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of the > stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even if > Hadoop alone isn't. > "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough > guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the community > (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. But > "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? Is > there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the > guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution for > Apache Hadoop. > > On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" > wrote: > > I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. > So... what TM protection? :-) > > You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the > derivative work follows the T&Cs... > > > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" > wrote: > > It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is > protected by trademark law, > and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under > copyright law. > > The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright > law, not trademark law. > (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my > employer's.) Since the Apache License > explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term > for this discussion. > > However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of > control over the name, > and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our > rights under that > law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that > we're having this discussion, > and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it > consistently. > > There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from > my days with Adobe and > PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still > claim "compatible with X" > as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an > "X". But you really need > a lawyer to get into that stuff. > > --Matt > > > On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. > > The math example is a bit flawed... > > X represents the set of stable releases. > Y represents the set of available patches. > C represents the set of Cloudera releases. > > So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained > in Y, > Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? > It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made > available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... > > So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components > are in Apache. > (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's > additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) > > Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. > And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. > > That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented > their changes. > Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. > So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete > subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say > 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based > on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion > their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) > > Clearly there are others out there... > Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... > > Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is > on the table... > > But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time > controlling derivative works... > I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential > loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and > as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. > > Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I > am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on > the opinion of my client... > (you know the rest....) > > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... > > Mike Segel > > On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > > wrote: > > On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some > such > that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage. > > Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? > > So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what > happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And > isn't > that the definition of a derived work? > > > Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes > Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). > > > > but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, > (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a > derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. > Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a > sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order > you may end up with a different body of source code...) > > Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, > depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look > at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room > implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of > facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may > encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR > patent may not apply to such implementations. > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of > its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the > original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of > its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the > original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > From general-return-3569-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 17:54:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 115934241 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39535 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:53:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39478 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39470 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 17:53:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:53:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:53:51 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4HHr9JY098419 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 17 May 2011 10:53:09 -0700 From: Matthew Foley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Matthew Foley Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:53:07 -0700 Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Topic: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Thread-Index: AcwUu0ef5rLyQdHoTXmZ6Li0qXoZsA== Message-ID: <38C5317C-45F8-4913-8BEE-3C1442961A55@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4DD2770E.2080204@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4DD2770E.2080204@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Constructions like, "Acme Foo powered by Apache Bar" are generally permit= ted... Hi Doug, Great document, very typical of company Trademark Policy documents. It needs to be read in conjunction with the FAQ at http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/ which is where the "powered by" mark usage is authorized. =20 The "Apache Project Branding Requirements" for PMCs, http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html goes into more depth, apparently covering all of what I said in my prior em= ail, and more. The FAQ about the "powered by" usage is not a general permission to use=20 similar constructions; rather it states 8 prescriptive guidelines for exact= ly=20 how it is okay to use this specific construction. The first one of those=20 requirements is that it can only be used for: "products or services that are supersets of the functionality of an= Apache=20 product, or services [that] are run atop Apache products" And this statement of permission in the publicly available FAQ constitutes = a license,=20 so it is imprecise to say that ASF doesn't license its trademarks. :-) The Project Branding page authorizes PMCs to develop their own "Powered by = "=20 or " Inside" programs. Has the Hadoop PMC done so? Is there a we= b page=20 for that? Our "PoweredBy" page is only a list of companies and products. I do need to clarify one thing I said below w.r.t. the "Apache Hadoop" cons= truction. It's perfectly fine to say "Apache Hadoop" as long as there is NOT ALSO a "= Yahoo Hadoop", a "Cloudera Hadoop", and an "EMC Hadoop". And indeed such competing usages= are=20 forbidden by this very fine Trademark Policy document, while mandating the = "Apache Hadoop" usage. Cheers, --Matt On May 17, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: Matt, Have you read Apache's trademark policy page? http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ Apache does not generally license its trademarks. Constructions like, "Acme Foo powered by Apache Bar" are generally permitted as they are not deemed to create confusion about the origin of Bar. Cheers, Doug On 05/17/2011 11:19 AM, Matthew Foley wrote: > TESS only has "registered" trademarks -- that's the kind of trademark you= put an "(R)" next to. > But you can have an ordinary unregistered trademark -- the kind you put a= "tm" next to -- > just by claiming it, and then promoting and defending it. >=20 > In the second paragraph of our bylaws we claim: > The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyrigh= t on > Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. > In the LICENSE.txt file in our distribution, clause 6 of the Apache Licen= se states, > 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the tra= de > names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, > except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing th= e > origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. > Very important! This exclusion of trademarks from the opensource license= is normal > and appropriate, precisely because it is the primary tool for preventing = confusion and > fragmentation in an opensource marketplace. >=20 > However, we also have to promote and defend the trademark. I'll leave it= up to the > lawyers to define exactly what that means, but it does take some effort. = We should > probably use the "tm" annotation in our logo GIFs and our primary market-= facing > documents (not so much in the code). Perhaps the PMC or Apache Board can= ask some > of our sponsor organizations to help out with some techdocs and trademark= legal review > assistance. It's not really a topic for us lay people to argue over, it = just wastes time. >=20 > WRT Scott's comments below, understand that trademark lawyers love to tal= k about using > trademarks only as "modifiers", i.e., essentially as adjectives. We shou= ldn't say "Chevrolet" > as a thing, we should say "Chevrolet (tm) cars". There are many kinds of= cars, and "Chevrolet" > is a mark distinguishing THIS kind of car from the others. You can't tra= demark THINGS, you > can only trademark DISTINGUISHING MARKS that differentiate things in the = marketplace. > And it has nothing to do with the underlying technology. >=20 > So here are three statements I believe to be true: >=20 > 1. We should defend against the usage "Apache Hadoop", "Cloudera Hadoop", > "Yahoo Hadoop", and "EMC Hadoop". This would imply that Hadoop was a THI= NG, > and those other words -- all trademarks! -- are the modifiers. Not accep= table. >=20 > 2. If the PMC chooses to, it is okay to allow usages like "Cloudera distr= ibution of > Hadoop", "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop", and "EMC distribution of Hadoop"= , or even > "powered by Hadoop", "built on Hadoop", "Hadoop inside", or whatever, whe= re > "Hadoop" is understood to mean "Hadoop distributed computing platform" > (as opposed to other kinds of distributed computing platform product). > ALL of those usages are claiming to "be Hadoop" in some sense, so they ar= e > protected by the trademark on "Hadoop". Therefore, they can only be used= if each > of those companies obtain a license from Apache to use the Hadoop tradema= rk, > which should include an agreement about correct use of the mark. And cur= rently > they DON'T have such a license, because the Apache License specifically e= xcludes > trademarks! >=20 > 3. If other companies choose to sell distributed computing platform produ= cts that > are NOT named "Hadoop", but their marketing literature says these product= s are > "compatible with Hadoop" while also making clear that they are not Hadoop= and > don't claim to be Hadoop -- we probably can't do anything about it. Clai= ms of > compatibility are generally protected for the sake of competition in the = marketplace. >=20 > If We-The-Community can come to an agreement about what compatibility mea= ns, > we can build it into the license to use the "Hadoop" trademark (as in #2 = above), then > enforce it with peer pressure and market rejection of non-conforming prod= ucts (#3). > But the only real help from the law will be in distinguishing case #2 fro= m case #3. >=20 > --Matt > "I am not a lawyer, the above is just my opinion, and does not represent = the opinion of my employer." >=20 >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Scott Carey wrote: >=20 > On trademarks, what about the phrase: "New distribution for Apache > Hadoop"? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of th= e > stack. I believe "Apache Hadoop" is trademarked in this context, even if > Hadoop alone isn't. > "Compatible with Apache Hadoop" is a smaller issue, defining some rough > guidelines for various forms of compatibility is useful for the community > (and reputable vendors), abuse of that will at least become obvious. But > "distribution for Apache Hadoop" (not too sure what 'for' means here)? I= s > there any TM protection? A proprietary derivative work with most of the > guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor a distribution fo= r > Apache Hadoop. >=20 > On 5/16/11 5:40 PM, "Segel, Mike" > wrote: >=20 > I just checked... TESS said no trademarks for Hadoop. > So... what TM protection? :-) >=20 > You are correct about derivative works. It's a moot point as long as the > derivative work follows the T&Cs... >=20 >=20 >=20 > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >=20 > Mike Segel >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 4:18 PM, "Matthew Foley" > wrote: >=20 > It's important to distinguish between the name "Hadoop", which is > protected by trademark law, > and the Hadoop implementation, which is licensed as opensource under > copyright law. >=20 > The term "derivative work" is, I believe, only relevant under copyright > law, not trademark law. > (N.B., I'm not a lawyer -- and this email is my opinion, not my > employer's.) Since the Apache License > explicitly allows derivative works, I don't think it's a useful term > for this discussion. >=20 > However, the ASF, and by delegation the Hadoop PMC, has a lot of > control over the name, > and how we allow it to be used, under trademark law. But to keeps our > rights under that > law, we have to enforce the trademark consistently. So it's good that > we're having this discussion, > and it's important to reach a conclusion, document it, and enforce it > consistently. >=20 > There are a lot of subtleties; for instance, if I recall correctly from > my days with Adobe and > PostScript(R), someone who has not licensed a trademark "X" can still > claim "compatible with X" > as long as they ALSO make clear that the product is NOT, itself, an > "X". But you really need > a lawyer to get into that stuff. >=20 > --Matt >=20 >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >=20 > But Cloudera's release is a bit murky. >=20 > The math example is a bit flawed... >=20 > X represents the set of stable releases. > Y represents the set of available patches. > C represents the set of Cloudera releases. >=20 > So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained > in Y, > Then does it not have the right to be considered Apache Hadoop? > It's my understanding is that any enhancement to Hadoop is made > available to Apache and will eventually make it into a later release... >=20 > So while it may not be 'official' release X(z), all of it's components > are in Apache. > (note: I'm talking about the core components and not Cloudera's > additional toolsets that encompass Hadoop.) >=20 > Cloudera is clearly a derivative work. > And IMHO is the only one which can say ... 'Includes Apache Hadoop'. >=20 > That doesn't mean that others can't, depending on how they implemented > their changes. > Based on EMC marketing material, they've done a rip and replace of HDFS. > So it wouldn't be a superset since it doesn't contain a complete > subset, but contains code that implements the API... So they can't say > 'Includes Apache Hadoop',but they can say it's a derivative work based > on Apache Hadoop and then go on to show how and why, in their opinion > their product is better.(that's marketing for you...) >=20 > Clearly there are others out there... > Hadoop on Cassandra as an example... >=20 > Fragmentation of Hadoop will occur. It's inevitable. Too much money is > on the table... >=20 > But because Apache's licensing is so open, Apache will have a hard time > controlling derivative works... > I believe that Steve is incorrect in his assertion concerning potential > loss of any patent protection. Again Apache's licensing is very open and > as long as they follow Apache's Ts and Cs, they are covered. >=20 > Note: because I am sending this from my email address at my client, I > am obliged to say that this email is my opinion and does not reflect on > the opinion of my client... > (you know the rest....) >=20 > Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos... >=20 > Mike Segel >=20 > On May 16, 2011, at 6:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > > wrote: >=20 > On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >=20 > But "distribution Z includes X" kind of implies the existence of some > such > that X !=3D Y, Y !=3D empty-set and X+Y =3D Z, at least in common usage. >=20 > Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change? >=20 > So doesn't this mean that your question reduces to the question of what > happens when non-Apache changes are made to an Apache release? And > isn't > that the definition of a derived work? >=20 >=20 > Yup. Which is why I doubt *any* commercial entity can claim "includes > Apache Hadoop" (including Cloudera). >=20 >=20 >=20 > but they can claim it is a derivative work, which CDH clearly is, > (Though if we were to come up with a formal declaration of what a > derivative work is, we'd have to handle the fact that it is a superset. > Even worse, you may realise a release is the ordered application of a > sequence of patches, and if the patches are applied in a different order > you may end up with a different body of source code...) >=20 > Something that implements the APIs may not be a derivative work, > depending on how much of the original code is in there. You could look > at the base classes and interfaces and produce a clean room > implementation (relying on the notion that interfaces are a list of > facts and not copyrightable in the US), but whoever does that may > encounter the issue that Google's donation of the right to use their MR > patent may not apply to such implementations. >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of > its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the > original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of > its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the > original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3570-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 13:20:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84DAB6B08 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91758 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 13:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91695 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 13:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91683 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 13:20:54 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:20:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [90.169.153.176]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:20:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4DD3C7B1.5010408@apache.org> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:20:49 +0200 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DD2770E.2080204@apache.org> <38C5317C-45F8-4913-8BEE-3C1442961A55@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <38C5317C-45F8-4913-8BEE-3C1442961A55@yahoo-inc.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/17/2011 07:53 PM, Matthew Foley wrote: > And this statement of permission in the publicly available FAQ constitutes a license, > so it is imprecise to say that ASF doesn't license its trademarks. :-) That's not the way I interpret it. I believe that a license would be required to permit a use that might create confusion while the FAQ provides sample stock phrases that are not thought to create confusion, i.e., nominal uses. > The Project Branding page authorizes PMCs to develop their own "Powered by " > or " Inside" programs. Has the Hadoop PMC done so? Is there a web page > for that? Our "PoweredBy" page is only a list of companies and products. There is an open issue to create a distinct "Powered by Hadoop" logo: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 Doug From general-return-3571-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 14:56:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C37B63B7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46044 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 14:56:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45995 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 14:56:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45987 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 14:56:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:56:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcoveney@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:56:41 +0000 Received: by gya6 with SMTP id 6so806807gya.35 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bDiHEwLp0x8PokHbSmx4usn3FE2uqy0tLtee4ZGYgME=; b=rEumMADRYiPs23GAv/muj1eAMmz408xlZi4EL5istDRF/M4bUtbOsjvQ2L8ZdiwmCc gQ5zmmlQja9QNM+p+gBDNtjaYsgeRkPoav6u0m+bBWs6wAhafrwk0HQ/0Uvrx/XcnuZO YRl4wFKFyYwNL43aTeU4fiOvXwD0RPzlXs41g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FAK0O/9cmrKuug++fWEyC6sVZ4JtDWl8RSmUblNU31vtLHREThfhjSDxr9UVQubV3R xhDWabJVTAZV+H4squsHnc38/27KpRq7Sg+EGKtw5who3EwG0U7kGH9+1tvWb22jvkqs ogu8qE0ExAlNECaovw4Pm84BPfTV03NF1q51E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.109.36 with SMTP id r24mr2152308yhg.327.1305730580493; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.208.5 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:56:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Hadoop Hackathon: 5/18 in Palo Alto and San Francisco From: Jonathan Coveney To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354867bb66c379704a38e1719 --002354867bb66c379704a38e1719 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think east coast Hackathons could be great (in DC here). 2011/5/16 Joe Stein > Any chance for something in the east (NYC) or do I need to start nagging > the > wife and kids that west coast weather is the way to go? > > I will post on the NYC HUG maybe we can get some Hack together contrib to > Hadoop.... but maybe some evening/day that a few commiters on this list > that > are in NYC (not sure if there are any based in NYC?) they can run a mini > hackathon to help get folks in contrib mode? that would rock! > > Maybe even some standard type of "Hack @ HUG" that every HUG can do with > their users (build, patch, build, deploy, test) if they want... > > Thanks to all contributors and commiters for your hard work and continued > efforts/dedication. > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher >wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > We've got a great group coming together again on Wednesday for an Apache > > Hadoop Hackathon in Palo Alto and San Francisco. Sign up at > > http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com. > > > > As a reminder, we'll have Nigel Daley, the release manager for 0.22, > > present > > in Palo Alto. If you have build and release or testing skills and would > > like > > to contribute to Apache Hadoop, your skills will be highly valued. Please > > consider coming out to meet Nigel and help out on that front! > > > > Also, there's a Hadoop User Group at Yahoo! in Sunnyvale on Wednesday > > evening: http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/events/16805258. There will be a > > large > > caravan leaving from the Palo Alto Hackathon to attend the HUG, so if you > > want to Hadoop all day, stop by Palo Alto and join us for the trip south. > > > > Regards, > > Jeff > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher > >wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > Thanks to everyone who came out for the Apache Hadoop Hackathon > yesterday > > > in Palo Alto and San Francisco. We had 35 people sign up from a great > > cross > > > section of companies: Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, Apple, Twitter, > > > Foursquare, AOL, Ngmoco, StumbleUpon, Trend Micro, Conviva, and more. > We > > had > > > committers from the HBase, Hive, Pig, and Oozie projects ensuring their > > > projects work with the upcoming 0.22 release, and a number of folks got > > > their first patches up. The 0.22 branch is now being built by Jenkins > and > > > we're in good shape to get a release candidate up soon. > > > > > > We had so much fun that we're going to do it again! > > > > > > Join us next Wednesday, May 18th, in either San Francisco or Palo Alto, > > and > > > help us continue the march to get feature development back on trunk. > > We'll > > > have a special guest in Palo Alto: Nigel Daley, Apache Hadoop PMC > member > > and > > > the release manager for the 0.22 release. If you're a sysadmin or > devops > > > person and want to help us build and test Apache Hadoop, this Hackathon > > will > > > be a great chance to learn about how it's done. Of course we'd also > love > > to > > > have developers looking to get their first patches into Hadoop as well. > > > > > > Sign up at http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com and we'll see you > > > Wednesday. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jeff > > > > > > p.s. if you're looking to prepare for the Hackathon, check out the > issues > > > tagged "newbie" at > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=labels+%3D+newbie > > > . > > > > > > > > > -- > > /* > Joe Stein > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > Twitter: @allthingshadoop > */ > --002354867bb66c379704a38e1719-- From general-return-3572-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 19:08:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 547A84DF9 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45845 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:08:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45151 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44806 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 19:08:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:07:59 +0000 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so1516494yia.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QYGAyAp17qezq0CAMMIagNfNjGjyfgM3swzaQrrIugI=; b=vsBBVJ5KYLpVPbjOeC2cZhHryF6RvHKypYwHxrhp2beRexCITVr+EayzKz2Naje9zM ttQNRU8rtUJe4KQT77a9Qqq72B/hBJZrRwMJTu3Qd2sOsd+4iFrFMS2qsItH9MR7/jc3 lll8OC9DLZ5QB0I3n/MgYxvFvzI8WzBMoKP88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=jNOCNzPpOqoq1ffjEITIa1RfYLF8KkEufFpdgAO6Pqc/eWn7F88XBUuh0/RYxinZfs vCrVuURYD7Fp/wssKcotjitx/q+TO49jWvVl0D1QHv8yWNm3EzMdUn/RSOFfGUR5L/rz DRiFlQxkCUzgA4DrrGHO0pg/ERQGItu9CUqis= Received: by 10.151.88.42 with SMTP id q42mr2808603ybl.402.1305832058118; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:07:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.110.18 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:07:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:07:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Next SF HUG: June 8, at RichRelevance To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd7070cf5e44004a3a5b74a --000e0cd7070cf5e44004a3a5b74a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We had a great time after the Cloudera hackathon last week with our monthly SF Hadoop User Group meetup. I'd like to thank Cloudera again for hosting such a successful event. Our next meetup will be held Wednesday, June 8, from 6pm to 8pm. This meetup will be hosted by our friends at RichRelevance. Their office is at 275 Battery St. #1150, though we'll be using their 9th floor conference space. As usual, we will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. Event schedule: - 6pm - Welcome - 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda - Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready - 8pm - Conclusion Food and refreshments will be provided, courtesy of RichRelevance. If you're going to attend, please RSVP at http://bit.ly/kxaJqa. Hope to see you all there! - Aaron Kimball --000e0cd7070cf5e44004a3a5b74a-- From general-return-3573-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:17:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD2334EDF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71773 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71683 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:17:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71667 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:17:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:17:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:17:37 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so3522770wyb.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=AOh2qB2OPmVca7Ydx7cVL2R3ULjlss4RoGiFAz1zmvI=; b=nARZIkHrxUPPnw7HMSGZY+B8MIiioExKHmIIJpr2Imi5rgzrmPw3b+xMnlHx+BozWz HBzrrt+SpXezv7VpwsQFO/AGVMnS4ws3I0jM7QGtkJpW4jtLCZYPGL5CI8f12udPg2M0 0UWiW/iYEcGeSbNbyL9rb4J1yb1EEAIihiaS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=xXH+ig/IvGfO6Uh5lapWji8Q3OFTy5qRMag1PU1EWOXLywTUKmGO20m0Nv2Po1NVQZ BZn1OVy8eaxVsMEeGlf8548wdj2UT/UncdzP+O3B2OKaW8n3Whc5Wkp0/SCYkcNPgYmW 5CLnvFSrGYhNQ6IC4IspQJxCeIoe9NZzx/lUU= Received: by 10.216.235.158 with SMTP id u30mr3328012weq.104.1305839836068; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:17:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.80 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:16:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakob Homan Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:16:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. Please join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, substantial contributions thus far. Matt is a great addition to our community! Jakob Apache Hadoop PMC From general-return-3574-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:19:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 076064960 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77052 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76956 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76940 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:19:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:37 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2247318qwj.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.68.106 with SMTP id u42mr2633272qci.284.1305839956261; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:19:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.217.79 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:18:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f91426b9fbfb04a3a78e3d --001485f91426b9fbfb04a3a78e3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congratulations, Matt. It's a pleasure working with you. Well-deserved. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. Please > join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, > substantial contributions thus far. Matt is a great addition to our > community! > > Jakob > Apache Hadoop PMC > --001485f91426b9fbfb04a3a78e3d-- From general-return-3575-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:25:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 811114E03 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90706 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90604 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90588 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:25:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1561171ewy.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.43.19 with SMTP id k19mr1253657eeb.187.1305840326495; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.22.6 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:25:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:25:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer From: Eli Collins To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Welcome Matt! On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. =A0Please > join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, > substantial contributions thus far. =A0Matt is a great addition to our > community! > > Jakob > Apache Hadoop PMC > From general-return-3576-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:30:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 258ED4F4B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96861 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:30:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96681 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:30:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96666 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:30:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:30:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:29:51 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p4JLSrlX054114; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:28:52 -0700 From: Kan Zhang To: "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:28:49 -0700 Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer Thread-Topic: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer Thread-Index: AcwWajnac070BELwSjCymRdtOggFPgAAYQJN Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9FAD9A134C6Ckanyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9FAD9A134C6Ckanyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congrats, Matt! On 5/19/11 2:16 PM, "Jakob Homan" wrote: On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. Please join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, substantial contributions thus far. Matt is a great addition to our community! Jakob Apache Hadoop PMC --_000_C9FAD9A134C6Ckanyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3577-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:33:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09AA4412A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 880 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:33:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 797 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:33:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 783 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:33:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:16 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1557557eya.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.0.133 with SMTP id 5mr1323274eeb.144.1305840773865; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.202.200 (bda-178-239-85-56.bis7.eu.blackberry.com [178.239.85.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3sm2146438eeh.23.2011.05.19.14.32.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 May 2011 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT) X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:1773068962 Message-ID:<1773068962-1305840770-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1605458944-@b2.c9.bise7.blackberry> Reply-To: michelan@hermanus.cc X-Priority: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest ApacheHadoop HDFS committer To: general@hadoop.apache.org,"hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" From: "Michelan Arendse" Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:32:49 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Welcome Matt. ------Original Message------ From: Kan Zhang To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org ReplyTo: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest ApacheHadoop HDFS committer Sent: May 19, 2011 11:28 PM Congrats, Matt! On 5/19/11 2:16 PM, "Jakob Homan" wrote: On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. Please join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, substantial contributions thus far. Matt is a great addition to our community! Jakob Apache Hadoop PMC From general-return-3578-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:35:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A41E746D1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5894 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5717 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5709 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:35:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:35:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 27189 invoked by uid 507); 19 May 2011 21:35:09 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.626323 secs); 19 May 2011 21:35:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 19 May 2011 21:35:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8FD132497F; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:35:09 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEkH5XaozydI; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:35:08 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.29] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [10.36.18.29]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D571324912; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:35:08 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DD5947D.3000404@uci.cu> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:36:53 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Jakob Homan , hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming Matt Foley as the newest Apache Hadoop HDFS committer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/19/2011 04:46 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > On behalf of the PMC, I am pleased to announce that Matt Foley has > been elected a committer in the Apache Hadoop HDFS project. Please > join me in congratulating Matt and thanking him for his sustained, > substantial contributions thus far. Matt is a great addition to our > community! > > Jakob > Apache Hadoop PMC Congratulations, Matt -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 http://about.me/marcosortiz From general-return-3579-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:36:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E74C546FA for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8567 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:36:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8509 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:36:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8501 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:36:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:36:16 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2257010qwj.35 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jR/bXI7zeYbnLyIx7juYGDU0YWK2vgKSMxOoupCDf+M=; b=DSjbtVlhzkeBpHObWbJ0uJ8WQykwgjdVMhASOt9Bc/sYgdgGkvVVJq7rXT0Ex8m2AJ p3T2GnLmGnx4xYrW/05xj0mXd/swQJY9ipcwF4z3kI6ektuLXfrgk1huXcLPxHmP9C66 9ngcePj6vRdS6mGfYx+Hr94ybK9dRDxEJMyAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=gyN9Kk70d7RXB3NcohoLjnSpehRyyCWlgOoz6+F5s7ShbEMRt4ixdMRxB1+y+DIVtb 9dpjJsgUVBtirJWvm7cKlR4scUVqNkOQ0HMOKupFxP90z3y3WzMcXd1+a9foiN4cp/T1 34THmECjAqUmG7ebSxzhBzazTl0mMg6avVG9U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.196.193 with SMTP id eh1mr2755204qab.236.1305840955892; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.19.208 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:35:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RngRJ8p1HZcF4DENigF9bhnozA4 Message-ID: Subject: ANN: HBase 0.90.3 available for download From: Stack To: Hbase-User , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache HBase team is happy to announce that HBase 0.90.3 is available from the Apache mirror of choice: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ HBase 0.90.3 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs since version 0.90.3, while retaining API and data compatibility. The release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12316313 Users upgrading from previous versions of 0.90 may upgrade clients and servers separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompanying that release: http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! -The HBase Team From general-return-3580-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 12:43:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6485699F for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26437 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 12:43:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26361 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 12:43:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26353 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 12:43:14 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:43:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [10.0.0.77]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username gsingers, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:43:14 +0000 From: Grant Ingersoll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Spring Scale-A-Thon RTP 2011 -- June 18th Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 08:43:12 -0400 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Those in the Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill North Carolina area or those = willing to travel might be interested in the upcoming Scale-A-Thon that = a few of us from the Triangle Hadoop User's Group (www.trihug.org) are = putting on. Scale-A-Thon is a one day hacker's event aimed at devs = wanting to hack on things like Hadoop, Mahout, HBase, Cassandra, etc. = This first time event is scheduled for June 18th. You can learn more at = http://www.scaleathon.com/2011/05/spring-scale-a-thon-rtp-2011/. It's a = free event, but is limited to the first 35 who register and tickets are = going fast. Hope to see you there, Grant= From general-return-3581-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:28:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 649E94353 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24681 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24619 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24610 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:28:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:28:15 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p4NGRVjD008596 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:27:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1306168051; bh=xBNXMzKUJda/HXyFqkspYX3q+smQCYk9WSV0yoL9X3Y=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=KnjmKxhaQ6zbpaWRnhGoR3eJHDYQ3JTg8M2nezBZoEgLnoRdHvgFuIOVV4c7c27IM 0KY4WWDaU0MWtoKoIgB5TMeeqkHKj8HgHO9ry8bfMtsJcO1fZt1iMxoEDOPNWh/+TI dzqY4lstgXiybkrFG1cOdkfBAeGOIwL6vDyWuVAA= Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:27:31 -0700 References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Agree. On May 12, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce > open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that > seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source > software seems like a different task. > > The Hadoop mark should only be used to refer to open-source software > produced by the ASF. If other folks wish to make factual statements > concerning our software, e.g., that their proprietary software passes > tests that we've created, that may be fine, but I don't think we > should > validate those claims by granting certifications to institutions. > That > ventures outside the mission of the ASF. We are not an accrediting > organization. > > Doug > > On 05/10/2011 12:29 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> >> Back in Jan 2011, I started a discussion about how to define Apache >> Hadoop Compatibility: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201101.mbox/%3C4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org%3E >> >> >> I am now reading EMC HD "Enterprise Ready" Apache Hadoop datasheet >> >> http://www.greenplum.com/sites/default/files/EMC_Greenplum_HD_DS_Final_1.pdf >> >> >> It claims that their implementations are 100% compatible, even though >> the Enterprise edition uses a C filesystem. It also claims that both >> their software releases contain "Certified Stacks", without defining >> what Certified means, or who does the certification -only that it >> is an >> improvement. >> >> >> I think we should revisit this issue before people with their own >> agendas define what compatibility with Apache Hadoop is for us >> >> >> Licensing >> -Use of the Hadoop codebase must follow the Apache License >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> -plug in components that are dynamically linked to (Filesystems and >> schedulers) don't appear to be derivative works on my reading of >> this, >> >> Naming >> -this is something for branding@apache, they will have their >> opinions. >> The key one is that the name "Apache Hadoop" must get used, and it's >> important to make clear it is a derivative work. >> -I don't think you can claim to have a Distribution/Fork/Version of >> Apache Hadoop if you swap out big chunks of it for alternate >> filesystems, MR engines, etc. Some description of this is needed >> "Supports the Apache Hadoop MapReduce engine on top of Filesystem >> XYZ" >> >> Compatibility >> -the definition of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is the Apache >> Source tree, >> -the definition of semantics of the Hadoop interfaces and classes is >> the Apache Source tree, including the test classes. >> -the verification that the actual semantics of an Apache Hadoop >> release >> is compatible with the expected semantics is that current and future >> tests pass >> -bug reports can highlight incompatibility with expectations of >> community users, and once incorporated into tests form part of the >> compatibility testing >> -vendors can claim and even certify their derivative works as >> compatible with other versions of their derivative works, but cannot >> claim compatibility with Apache Hadoop unless their code passes the >> tests and is consistent with the bug reports marked as ("by design"). >> Perhaps we should have tests that verify each of these "by design" >> bugreps to make them more formal. >> >> Certification >> -I have no idea what this means in EMC's case, they just say >> "Certified" >> -As we don't do any certification ourselves, it would seem impossible >> for us to certify that any derivative work is compatible. >> -It may be best to state that nobody can certify their derivative as >> "compatible with Apache Hadoop" unless it passes all current test >> suites >> -And require that anyone who declares compatibility define what they >> mean by this >> >> This is a good argument for getting more functional tests out there >> -whoever has more functional tests needs to get them into a test >> module >> that can be used to test real deployments. >> From general-return-3582-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 16:24:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 476AD6744 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33256 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33190 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33182 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:24:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39FE1BA95D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:24:05 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3-7-zmt7WnEJ for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:24:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6E41BA310 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:24:05 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1306859033.1297@CR2B36gh1q+FE4lOBYZFbQ Received: from [16.25.172.146] (dhcp-172-146.hpl.hp.com [16.25.172.146]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4OGNqq4012877 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:23:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DDBDB98.6040302@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:23:52 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110419 Red Hat/3.1.10-1.el6_0 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p4OGNqq4012877 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've drafted a policy on the wiki based on this discussion. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop Others need to look at, edit, etc, then we can vote on whether to take it into the managed documentation. From general-return-3583-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 06:47:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FEFD6E06 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50581 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 06:47:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50404 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 06:47:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50389 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 06:47:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:47:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 06:46:58 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_5KSBVT9feIVA4w/dMwA6zw)" Received: from [10.0.1.4] ([76.103.137.188]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LLS008AUITPO420@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:46:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-05-26_02:2011-05-26,2011-05-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1105250235 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Update on 0.22 Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:46:36 -0700 Message-id: <1F63BF19-F939-432C-9B77-8ADC4731A05E@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Boundary_(ID_5KSBVT9feIVA4w/dMwA6zw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Looks like we're down to 12 blockers on 0.22. * Thanks to Cloudera for hosting a couple hack-a-thons over the past couple of weeks which helped get this number down. * Thanks to Devaraj Das for volunteering to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2178 committed. * Thanks to Tom White for getting a CI build running that creates the actual release artifact. I'm planning to commit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 (SVN reorg) this Friday at 2pm PDT. Todd, were you able to test git history based on your svn dump and import? Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_5KSBVT9feIVA4w/dMwA6zw)-- From general-return-3584-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 21:46:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413A7493D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93177 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:46:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92500 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92173 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 21:46:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:46:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:46:05 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.45.111.134] ([67.136.90.250]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LLV0010PJ2UHA70@asmtp025.mac.com>; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:44:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-05-27_06:2011-05-27,2011-05-27,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1105270168 Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <1F63BF19-F939-432C-9B77-8ADC4731A05E@mac.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:45:08 -0700 Message-id: <44FF77C5-A535-4D8B-B461-978C803F0D33@mac.com> References: <1F63BF19-F939-432C-9B77-8ADC4731A05E@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-dev@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm starting this now. Nige On May 25, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm planning to commit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 (SVN reorg) this Friday at 2pm PDT. Todd, were you able to test git history based on your svn dump and import? > > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-3585-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 01:22:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E5B6478F for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 01:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48856 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 01:22:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48780 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 01:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48765 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 01:22:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 01:22:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 01:22:30 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.45.111.134] ([67.136.90.250]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LLV00ASRT4WS270@asmtp020.mac.com>; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:22:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-05-27_08:2011-05-28,2011-05-27,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1105270230 Subject: Re: Update on 0.22 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <44FF77C5-A535-4D8B-B461-978C803F0D33@mac.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:22:08 -0700 Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <5E56623C-A3BB-4AFF-87DA-59370D031785@mac.com> References: <1F63BF19-F939-432C-9B77-8ADC4731A05E@mac.com> <44FF77C5-A535-4D8B-B461-978C803F0D33@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I had to call this off as the auth and email patch was out of date. I'll reschedule for next Friday at 2pm. Nige On May 27, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm starting this now. > > Nige > > On May 25, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> I'm planning to commit https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 (SVN reorg) this Friday at 2pm PDT. Todd, were you able to test git history based on your svn dump and import? >> >> Cheers, >> Nige > From general-return-3586-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 13:22:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 662104B02 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 13:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59022 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 13:22:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58189 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 13:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57624 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 13:22:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 13:22:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 13:22:09 +0000 Received: from 22-94.77-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.77.94.22] helo=t61.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QQfwC-0001Z1-88; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:21:48 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org, dev@lucene.apache.org, dev@nutch.apache.org, lily-developers@googlegroups.com Subject: Keysigning @ Berlin Buzzwords Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 13:46:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.38-2-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201105291346.44102.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =46rom my blog: Whenever you download some software from the Apache Software Foundation, th= ere=20 is a small .asc file besides every software release. This tiny file is a=20 cryptographic signature to protect you from accidentally downloading and=20 running malware. However this signature is only as good as the web-of-trust between you and = the=20 Release Manager of the Software project. At BerlinBuzzWords many developers and users will gather at one place. This= is=20 a unique occasion to strengthen the web-of-trust. Therefor we want to=20 encourage and remind you to use the occassion for keysigning! For lack of t= ime=20 there won't be an official keysigning party, but you have occassion during= =20 lunch, coffee break or the barbecue to do quick one-to-one keysignings. You should bring print-outs of your key fingerprints and identification=20 documents. If you put the fingerprints in your batch (see picture) everyone= =20 can easily see them and ask you for a quick trust exchange. We may also mark a "keysigning= =20 corner" somewhere where people can go and meet others for key signing. Hints: * under Debian (and Ubuntu) you can get a PDF to print out your=20 fingerprints many times via: sudo aptitude install signing-party ghostscript=20 gpg-key2ps KEYID | ps2pdf - fingerprints.pdf * the signing-party package also contains the tool "caff" to batch proc= ess=20 the signing of keys after the event * please only use keys with at least 2024 bits! * please make sure that you've uploaded your key to a public keyserver * I'm happy to answer all remaining questions at the BarCamp on Sunday = or=20 during the event Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-3587-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:09:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAF0B475B for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 227 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 160 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:08:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 152 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:08:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:49 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so3087666pzk.35 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.36.194 with SMTP id s2mr2515566pbj.119.1306879708132; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm388810pbk.52.2011.05.31.15.08.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2011 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Defining Hadoop Compatibility -revisiting- From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <4DDBDB98.6040302@apache.org> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:08:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DC91392.2010308@apache.org> <4DCCCCB2.6020607@apache.org> <4DDBDB98.6040302@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 24, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >=20 > I've drafted a policy on the wiki based on this discussion. >=20 > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop >=20 > Others need to look at, edit, etc, then we can vote on whether to take = it into the managed documentation. I think it looks great. Thanks for your work at drafting it, Steve. It = addresses the rapidly growing problem of=20 Do we need the escape clause that states "or other products which have = written approval from the VP, Apache Brand Management?" I think that = will just cause lots of petitions from the numerous companies with = rationalizations about why their exception should be allowed. If we = limit Hadoop to mean precisely the Apache releases, there is no = ambiguity or room to argue. -- Owen= From general-return-3588-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 23:10:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 844F0416A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74437 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:10:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74388 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:10:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74373 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 23:10:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:10:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:10:16 +0000 Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so3051164gwj.35 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ozoJRLKVVaSeJBOvjVDjQNnk2tQ2mLYqLA0ywvezsFg=; b=E0KP74m2OJlLRwvuf6IVhTGSi/GzQimgQF7K4/+OW1Z9LfFD2P2uHKoRi3mS9fqGRi c3h/tRKV6/Tq/Zrq3hxu5Ybo7ZhKBIDNAJ/PdIJeL7CBwKnQKHou5ZJSD4UPbHy9DMN+ RS3bCvqMgkW+PLmZZSdbB85HItN5QaLN1ImaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Ze5ZDt979BOmgovSNy2Ts+NwKeRPENUHKOyErmZ5V0C1KhJY4QPbY7sD6kkKHOOP2T 12duSK3IZQ+genXSGF3Sy0gAhF8WA2mziZTmABC45tvkze616WtbW6a8ylb61k7FuuCx 22dngQcmw5UpWV4q7RqLT7VwtfMOVs7RQjYOE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.189.34 with SMTP id r34mr4131407anp.77.1306883395465; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.239.20 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:09:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MT_LUu9Gx3S-izf05WWfa_4NoHE Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.3 available for download From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's all under the tags in the github repo: https://github.com/apache/hbase J-D On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jack Levin wrote: > Hello, is there a git repo URL I could use to check out that code version= ? > > -Jack > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Stack wrote: >> The Apache HBase team is happy to announce that HBase 0.90.3 is >> available from the Apache mirror of choice: >> >> =A0http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ >> >> HBase 0.90.3 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs >> since version 0.90.3, while retaining API and data compatibility. The >> release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: >> >> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D12= 310753&version=3D12316313 >> >> Users upgrading from previous versions of 0.90 may upgrade clients and s= ervers >> separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading >> from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompany= ing >> that release: >> >> =A0http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html >> >> As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! >> >> -The HBase Team >> > From general-return-3589-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 23:12:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796BC4217 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82089 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:12:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81931 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68303 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 23:07:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magnito@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r9pg4QDd8rb5JwRtC6f8dZU+7tkJeoiu7rCfAneU/WY=; b=TTjwYcMmcNYc/kN5JTt2jeiPwKu+oMyHnOKM/Q9f9/0nCUKN+czevfhe0Oh0YTL8wy 1F3YWghOPk8/pwC1pKCEaNQskDJLpIATRGmkddL8+nuQjOWDNOQgrchAViGUVapNoN/K q9apmEHRgdE9+3j1DZaw3cMGRIDTZq1uX02Ss= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ln4zOwMtzXsCCksakupzp31NxKx+wdYdx8HVtLu6M/M9h+P15e6kEBAZMjZignzlgf lHg8HJW5hksGFU1GGyIEOTB1kyp5e4dUOoNyfqKGyPc3omBbJkskL9EypaKte71DT6Dl xhIDV7QVkFOaw2NF6KZ4+JKpehKDDMZmRkk10= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:06:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.3 available for download From: Jack Levin To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, is there a git repo URL I could use to check out that code version? -Jack On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Stack wrote: > The Apache HBase team is happy to announce that HBase 0.90.3 is > available from the Apache mirror of choice: > > =A0http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ > > HBase 0.90.3 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs > since version 0.90.3, while retaining API and data compatibility. The > release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: > > =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D123= 10753&version=3D12316313 > > Users upgrading from previous versions of 0.90 may upgrade clients and se= rvers > separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading > from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompanyi= ng > that release: > > =A0http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html > > As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! > > -The HBase Team > From general-return-3590-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 23:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE43A4250 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84057 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83971 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83924 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 23:12:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:12:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.194] (HELO nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:12:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 May 2011 23:11:56 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.133] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 May 2011 23:11:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 May 2011 23:11:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 324022.91035.bm@omp1016.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 9256 invoked by uid 60001); 31 May 2011 23:11:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1306883516; bh=21IIFxxy2bYm9XnKUPyknJ0dWmhqxh4g1spYis3zHbc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bzzjVpyEQtwAzGBhCNy6ULRR7n0kLpkmcKE2FPj3Zbz2s/HCn47ALldyOthXQhLklgnhfCHKjLT/SEXQAOer/N+e2NmTswZZ3Ag2ECaVAJIrvGMggdNuFok1+FkEBbUOWDJ0zB1VBAKmP2pO1PGExYC7cPX1+wBlKeigOzKUkRQ= Message-ID: <937378.9182.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CxB9jqEVM1nQBlhFz7caBjJZrsysb7vGT.3Wb8EI3Bsvmvy 28Rwn_ghYneRrv3EhPB.hwfhhjvRFDtqJwaPLos3B7zZwx60.jStzfKRsrRk 1jph15pq93bnNOC8ye2NncEnn1Ivkc_QB_JIjKl36Tr6kEpSNfQRfB_0r53g 4uYnaXxn..jQoR4avuhY5SBkiym9zKRNpzuKTYnF.8udJ_HcRs.GSdJ3WBQR CMWwwFM4Ycu85u45uHNwX48aGj53p_5tGvtd.cpbHvQGRW8et6Jtt6dnQsDC vIoTJjB2KUYnh33QmgPnB1DJr6lVQOTd9DTDjpAXa04ywVB0.9DeTXrpwfVo nlj3YCmy1tHDSdWY3CTchJJywzdwVxQUxlxQxDlyC2uyj1gfcFDA_ICNt0Bu pM2KDueU2eXyi6dpZdzAH2e7gRHJad_cORyN_ucHFRss4bDRqtJmzIUjNgag YXGNOSkxE.koiTOiNdYkoVb_gcDgZv2VqkFPVY2wHcycWmlaILUwO5t_P.nf PJVwR5r6lwc1tMp7KvbfxG14F Received: from [64.168.229.50] by web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:11:55 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.3 available for download To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Jack Levin > Hello, is there a git repo URL I could use to check out that > code version? git://git.apache.org/hbase.git or git://github.com/apache/hbase.git or https://github.com/apache/hbase.git Then checkout tag '0.90.3' From general-return-1276-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 03:13:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15990 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 03:13:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 03:13:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 8349 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:13:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8145 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8117 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 03:13:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.73] (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:13:21 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5493918065; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-excaht04.vmware.com (pa-excaht04.vmware.com [10.113.81.155]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAADDC168; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-excaht04.vmware.com ([10.113.81.155]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:59 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "hive-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:56 -0700 Subject: How to Recommission? Thread-Topic: How to Recommission? Thread-Index: AcrRSTnY7FRKEnlYTMunq01Wom7ORA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E89A1D8EXCHMBX22vmwa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E89A1D8EXCHMBX22vmwa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How to Recommission or decommission DataNode(s) in hadoop??? Decommission(Del some Datanodes): On a large cluster removing one or two data-nodes will not lead to any data= loss, because name-node will replicate their blocks as long as it will detect that the nodes are dead. With a large number of nodes getting r= emoved or dying the probability of losing data is higher. Hadoop offers the decommission feature to retire a set of existing data-nod= es. The nodes to be retired should be included into the exclude file, and the exclude file name should be specified as a configuration parameter = dfs.hosts.exclude. This file should have been specified during namenode startup. It could be a zero length file. You must use the full hos= tname, ip or ip:port format in this file. Then the shell command bin/hadoop dfsadmin -refreshNodes should be called, which forces the name-node to re-read the exclude file an= d start the decommission process. Decommission does not happen momentarily since it requires replication of p= otentially a large number of blocks and we do not want the cluster to be overwhelmed with just this one job. The decommission progress can be mon= itored on the name-node Web UI. Until all blocks are replicated the node will be in "Decommission In Progress" state. When decommission is done= the state will change to "Decommissioned". The nodes can be removed whenever decommission is finished. But how to Recommission? Wish your help. Thanks. --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E89A1D8EXCHMBX22vmwa_-- From general-return-1277-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 03:18:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16772 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 03:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 03:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 11358 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:17:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11261 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11251 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 03:17:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:17:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:17:49 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o3120Xsq032186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:00:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4BB41041.9040409@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:17:21 -0700 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: How to Recommission? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020907020401030906050007" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------ms020907020401030906050007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/31/2010 08:12 PM, Zhanlei Ma wrote: > How to Recommission or decommission DataNode(s) in hadoop??? > Decommission(Del some Datanodes): > On a large cluster removing one or two data-nodes will not lead to any = data loss, because name-node will replicate their blocks as long as it > [...] > > > > But how to Recommission? Wish your help. > Thanks. > Remove the hostname from your dfs.hosts.exclude file and run 'hadoop=20 dfsadmin -refreshNodes'. Then start the datanode process in the=20 'recommissioned' datanode again. --Mike --------------ms020907020401030906050007 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwNDAxMDMx NzIxWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUip2eR4Jlx75fxDsJTGHCO0hvMT4wXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBADJzxwW5decknac3qoOs WbQBigXcAKWp7FZyiSoKyEsfeiRthkm7vYWnVBfJMmXm0NBfJnU4r3Oe59S8sgtWHHLbtMJF AhYpuY9DleTFZwh+4IFeSjtB/RKDrFmrNGFeg+1yzxX3qS0lTFc5HLw7zFcKZ0jiBao02sVM IWzARTB4itUERfCbBxUCdfRDJ6DSm6Zh/LZz4y9bAd8VuK9KvWoqM6TR2ezMOklyGALw3xBT YbB5X28gBuwojEqn/dLW58oDQlolpmqTE2ldkkAud1sbUDQ3Zw8Kx3wHof69D2FDQZAPZ4Rv mXYx+hpbsE0qzNfWKojjaQIKiTqQW4eP9yAAAAAAAAA= --------------ms020907020401030906050007-- From general-return-1278-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 03:27:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17890 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 03:27:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 03:27:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 20187 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:27:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18709 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18679 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 03:27:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:27:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:26:58 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=Sa1Md/x6lFIj0GTYl4JUuVISsHfHAz8bF1RW9TObHO0pTKJGjP3poG8z DjaFVGg2FNm9/gVbX8Y53OtAYu78jlDPtDd53OWCJ6zGx3HLMoneTEu2c TEzWwb14odrRCN3; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1270092418; x=1301628418; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20How=20to=20Recommission?|Date:=20Thu, =201=20Apr=202010=2003:20:38=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"general@hadoop. apache.org"=20,=0D=0A=09"hive- user@hadoop.apache.org"=20, =0D=0A=09"common-user@hadoop.apache.org"=20,=0D=0A=09"mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache. org"=20|MIME-Version: =201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<486a03af-953f-4ae2-8681-00a70a3fffde> |In-Reply-To:=20; bh=Ega8eF5n3LkNYSe82fbahFnCfB1ZiL/gb5SM2Mlh2jo=; b=XsmWKSJ7nCb7aoeb/P1BZUXqpPtdCoyw+/rAFCnaQ/Zl1hY6oWXl90Bt ADOFFZppCqeG5A2GEDwo2uyMKQ9mBmPmS/lk80uxo0j3NXQzY5IOw9+jl zxJR7QN/SPn1sLo; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,345,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="11709058" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:20:40 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:20:39 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:20:39 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "hive-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: How to Recommission? Thread-Topic: How to Recommission? Thread-Index: AcrRSTnY7FRKEnlYTMunq01Wom7ORAAARL7o Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 03:20:38 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <486a03af-953f-4ae2-8681-00a70a3fffde> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2010 03:20:40.0229 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E24A550:01CAD14A] On 3/31/10 8:12 PM, "Zhanlei Ma" wrote: > But how to Recommission? Wish your help. Take them out of dfs.exclude and refreshnodes again. From general-return-1279-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 03:29:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18170 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 03:29:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 03:29:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 23155 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:29:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22975 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 03:29:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22967 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 03:29:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:29:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.69] (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:28:58 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55B817002 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-excaht03.vmware.com (pa-excaht03.vmware.com [10.113.81.154]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93C4CD902 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-excaht03.vmware.com ([10.113.81.154]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:28:36 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:28:34 -0700 Subject: RE: How to Recommission? Thread-Topic: How to Recommission? Thread-Index: AcrRSe9fULyTds46RvWIhcIWc1eEggAAXEsg Message-ID: References: <4BB41041.9040409@hep.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <4BB41041.9040409@hep.caltech.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org SSBnb3QgaXQsVGhhbmtzDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBNaWNo YWVsIFRob21hcyBbbWFpbHRvOnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHVdIA0KU2VudDogMjAxMMTq NNTCMcjVIDExOjE3DQpUbzogZ2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6 IEhvdyB0byBSZWNvbW1pc3Npb24/DQoNCk9uIDAzLzMxLzIwMTAgMDg6MTIgUE0sIFpoYW5sZWkg TWEgd3JvdGU6DQo+IEhvdyB0byBSZWNvbW1pc3Npb24gb3IgZGVjb21taXNzaW9uIERhdGFOb2Rl KHMpIGluIGhhZG9vcD8/Pw0KPiBEZWNvbW1pc3Npb24oRGVsIHNvbWUgRGF0YW5vZGVzKToNCj4g T24gYSBsYXJnZSBjbHVzdGVyIHJlbW92aW5nIG9uZSBvciB0d28gZGF0YS1ub2RlcyB3aWxsIG5v dCBsZWFkIHRvIGFueSBkYXRhIGxvc3MsIGJlY2F1c2UgbmFtZS1ub2RlIHdpbGwgcmVwbGljYXRl IHRoZWlyIGJsb2NrcyBhcyBsb25nIGFzIGl0DQo+DQpbLi4uXQ0KPg0KPg0KPg0KPiBCdXQgaG93 IHRvIFJlY29tbWlzc2lvbj8gV2lzaCB5b3VyIGhlbHAuDQo+IFRoYW5rcy4NCj4NCg0KUmVtb3Zl IHRoZSBob3N0bmFtZSBmcm9tIHlvdXIgZGZzLmhvc3RzLmV4Y2x1ZGUgZmlsZSBhbmQgcnVuICdo YWRvb3AgDQpkZnNhZG1pbiAtcmVmcmVzaE5vZGVzJy4gIFRoZW4gc3RhcnQgdGhlIGRhdGFub2Rl IHByb2Nlc3MgaW4gdGhlIA0KJ3JlY29tbWlzc2lvbmVkJyBkYXRhbm9kZSBhZ2Fpbi4NCg0KLS1N aWtlDQoNCg== From general-return-1280-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 11:20:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7683 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 11:20:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 11:20:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 48865 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 11:20:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48697 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 11:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48688 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 11:20:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:20:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:20:10 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o31BIrTG011233 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 04:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=Gs3GWFWEAAKYk3YppWn1KR7+XmRHRq61y9G+PIwrwZktgBrNSQreJU6D9gOUw3eR Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:48:52 +0530 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:48:51 +0530 Subject: HADOOP-6671 - To use maven for hadoop common builds Thread-Topic: HADOOP-6671 - To use maven for hadoop common builds Thread-Index: AcrRjRssjAQqHsuAH0CAy/QdN8LW6A== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7DA7EF3119B1gkesavanyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7DA7EF3119B1gkesavanyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I 've filed this jira "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671" f= or porting hadoop-common builds to maven. Please let me know of your thoughts and suggestion, if any. Thanks, giri --_000_C7DA7EF3119B1gkesavanyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1281-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:06:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86645 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:06:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:06:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 97457 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:06:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97388 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97380 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:06:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.183.74] (HELO web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.136.183.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:06:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 74635 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Apr 2010 15:05:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1270134339; bh=hkrmBdXuS2DsC58ZcyHrghxVNwM+IfKbAKcJhVCQ5ZA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FU+7mLAbcd4HQXUR3cNwfIlGGdrwk6Zg0hRfBAJMBMJtFsYuJelJa68g3HDeDHB10QA8z0NKwfEGpKaXAN1PRrsolV9DZw7wUa+WgHj0p6LaXIu3opYJjX2Ltt4erM89GtA6WZ2PXLuh7mcNd30kJTMxzlaSjjzcTNcZ9QY4byc= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=poG8GSGEfpzAbu3xMlCHNG6WMy69K1GYW+wvembJX0X17cQZ3S7oQWYZGKkGcpfvj9wPgwzXOWOlqOR5krMyoxhp0t6QZEiT3rSsS9pcv1NKynwM7sdsr3eveFezWb1Q/lxUBt57rS7WZoZuq8mQBco4QJjrAwLb/N8ZawdRoMg=; Message-ID: <629658.74161.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: m9BqknUVM1l3h6dGWvNV6qG5y5lXOWLCweqiay_p.TWath1 UoSxi19Y7kAQddbd0klO8G6SxdSYRhoq578FXNwrJydBzORc0MnZWkbIuuhx z8TtKEWnGCLrq2xqcp44SjK7t.a.Yv5LpkKTuwcQDA9Z6y3QNnuOm9EzLKrb J49YROc4j2AJ3oM_naSyHh0nkZCB2UcIlRwzQlPncFaorPOBubn5nOf_VW1u LJ9SAWr03fbsexQ2Se4h8w00XSVNwxAxTJSGcjv.cIrZ9dd0qG4vjBCaWv8h 7sSvk2jfFHDrbnXUc4w.O.sKUOzBGidhWgBBvjANfoIgUHHR91GOlfPRDXWA bK9mW4kQdQ01RwNGUE8Tph5yxD4cUjOzM_C.8mR2ozmTwxnXI_AAYLHDbiR3 oTT2Lpfglat14sz1SCt3dE5IKiSvUbZYH3aXMbQ2I_0_km45KKkcSMm.MYma wisy_WLemT9dHw_DHi1H9H6kPPD6FknbfDmah0yqViunpfkXGIjKjfXcSaNQ KHSarGzMECUNMGTkgFF9dyUXHCNd4sGOSLw-- Received: from [72.177.134.58] by web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:05:39 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/324.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Abernathy Subject: [VOTE] Replace HBase with Cassandra To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I propose a vote to replace HBase as a Hadoop sub-project with Cassandra. Why members should vote for this proposal: * Twitter is using Cassandra * Cassandra sounds like someone you'd trust your kids with, "HBase" sounds like a pathogen. * You'll never have to kill -9 a namenode * The Cassandra logo looks better on tshirts * Hadoop has two sub-projects beginning with "H" and none with "C" * Twitter is using Cassandra The vote will remain open for 72 hours. Thanks, -- Bill Abernathy billabernathy@ymail.com From general-return-1282-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:12:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88287 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:12:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:12:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3055 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:12:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3013 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3005 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:12:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:12:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:12:46 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=AC97mtE9fCpYc6zNOVD9W8lSj/e5UWh/+9+tBdrDrvkBYV4b+/ZbNLoD iFkVz+WeYCpCwm3IdZldMjN8jBeDRjUdavvr2wYqA2kK520fTWk3dblSl uKKqwTyq0VxGh0J; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1270134765; x=1301670765; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Replace=20HBase=20with=20Cassa ndra|Date:=20Thu,=201=20Apr=202010=2015:12:13=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20 |To:=20"general@hadoop.apache.org"=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20 quoted-printable|Content-ID:=20<906e227a-7982-4af3-b115-6 7ae87a7c22d>|In-Reply-To:=20<629658.74161.qm@web114514.ma il.gq1.yahoo.com>; bh=c+ZNEmLtst2+AYdJGuMI0JDUiA5BnV1D+5KiWY0MZHI=; b=dLadOi1lWSvSBoXjqmSbAyjClD2LdXgGHbgwXDlvNNUelZ0iesq6/XO4 X/UiN1VI9/jCxkLEgyYlSNdqlMW6Ck6zc8a8n38bggfCvE/oYqqcXzQTA 1gi2X5OJmGw1/eg; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,348,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="11716669" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:12:15 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:12:14 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:12:14 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace HBase with Cassandra Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Replace HBase with Cassandra Thread-Index: AQHK0azd5qLg+2GMuk6gobeVJdxv+pINuBCA Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:12:13 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <629658.74161.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <906e227a-7982-4af3-b115-67ae87a7c22d> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2010 15:12:15.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[B66DFF90:01CAD1AD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm turning off my email today. On 4/1/10 8:05 AM, "Bill Abernathy" wrote: >=20 > I propose a vote to replace HBase as a Hadoop sub-project with Cassandra. >=20 > Why members should vote for this proposal: >=20 > * Twitter is using Cassandra > * Cassandra sounds like someone you'd trust your kids with, "HBase" sound= s > like a pathogen. > * You'll never have to kill -9 a namenode > * The Cassandra logo looks better on tshirts > * Hadoop has two sub-projects beginning with "H" and none with "C" > * Twitter is using Cassandra >=20 > The vote will remain open for 72 hours. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > -- > Bill Abernathy > billabernathy@ymail.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > =20 From general-return-1283-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:20:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97309 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:19:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18019 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:19:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17979 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17970 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:19:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:19:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:19:52 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so1109897pwi.35 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:19:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=lVhI50R2MRBSTBvCWcV8jZuQgaglm078ZPfyl4j+KYs=; b=FvsTlEbGKh9j4hUHXsyuNMu6+PzfZo2eIRid/8LzcSLznAox+UGUGBXb16M0UUsr+4 V/UB5aviDVpy6VDyielJ9fw/XwrAqW/5XALxX/d1edCvQ31kYNFelidOyaVGaIh7MXa1 ISYIcG5X/1EY7HJAaLn3beULtH24jndeevRCw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date :references; b=SBcBFNUKPAaQFNYaxWKuoQuVQUnD6DOH40Ocx/6reR2sSNgomvAhVtUsvIE+zJRIts 4f2yHFhoXRLx/pVjhGXNjX2qLn2LxcjZQ1+TZt/gPwlqYr8BhMVV8MSsu1RCPijiqqIO TM9fBwUM09gfHVp7LB0CXRhbrdOiXr9+D1H5o= Received: by 10.141.108.19 with SMTP id k19mr565499rvm.110.1270135170723; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.14.254.105] ([166.205.138.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm6949288pzk.3.2010.04.01.08.19.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <90F2C2FE-BDDC-4BEC-901D-9BE917107BDF@gmail.com> From: Owen O'Malley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace HBase with Cassandra Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:19:21 -0700 References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would have gone with the starting line, "Since HBase will soon become an Apache top level project..." -- Owen On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > I'm turning off my email today. > > > On 4/1/10 8:05 AM, "Bill Abernathy" wrote: > >> >> I propose a vote to replace HBase as a Hadoop sub-project with >> Cassandra. >> >> Why members should vote for this proposal: >> >> * Twitter is using Cassandra >> * Cassandra sounds like someone you'd trust your kids with, "HBase" >> sounds >> like a pathogen. >> * You'll never have to kill -9 a namenode >> * The Cassandra logo looks better on tshirts >> * Hadoop has two sub-projects beginning with "H" and none with "C" >> * Twitter is using Cassandra >> >> The vote will remain open for 72 hours. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Bill Abernathy >> billabernathy@ymail.com >> >> >> >> > From general-return-1284-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 18:59:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38660 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 18:59:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 18:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 78516 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:59:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77876 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77654 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 18:59:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:59:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:59:36 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o32IwEVR050459; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=Rt0JJfESr8EYhvBHk0+P/GrjA8E25RX6NfZVw6pDReqBlqB98uLlE4REevqUxlbC Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:58:14 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:58:13 -0700 Subject: Hadoop Bay Area User Group - April 21st - Agenda and registration available! Thread-Topic: Hadoop Bay Area User Group - April 21st - Agenda and registration available! Thread-Index: AcrSlnIpAEqUnd84RWOGjIrQGwpYFA== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE055C949@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE055C949SP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE055C949SP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, RSVP is open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yahoo! = Sunnyvale Campus, Wednesday, 21st, 6PM Registration and Agenda are available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/cal= endar/13002132/ Looking forward to seeing you there! Dekel --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE055C949SP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-1285-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 22:26:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77508 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 22:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 22:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 74967 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 22:26:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74850 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 22:26:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60331 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 09:33:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-pt: isis.lip6.fr X-Authentication-Warning: ari-31-201-04.infop6.jussieu.fr: 2961083 set sender to jonathan.lejeune@etu.upmc.fr using -f Subject: Project for studies From: LEJEUNE JONATHAN To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:32:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1270204337.19663.16.camel@ari-31-201-04.infop6.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.3) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:32:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Score: 8 (********) M_LOTO X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (8.0 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description --- --------- ----------- 8.0 M_LOTO From: une lotterie ou un jeu X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8 required=3 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 132.227.60.2 Dear project members, We are two french students from Universit=C3=A9 Pierre et Marie Curie (Pari= s 6), and we are working on the Hadoop project (framework mapreduce). We are trying to modify the faults tolerance by replicating tasks (map tasks and reduce tasks).=20 We are going to start tests.So we need to have an access to repository's Hadoop. Is it possible ? What is the procedure ? Thanks.=20 Regards.=20 Jonathan LEJEUNE and Madeleine PIFFARETTI From general-return-1286-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 22:28:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77767 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 22:28:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 22:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 80123 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 22:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80040 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 22:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80032 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 22:28:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.203] (HELO mail-iw0-f203.google.com) (209.85.223.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:28:37 +0000 Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so1656621iwn.20 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:28:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5xcycrxHfXSTamd2XNODKTHsE+w3/cZCpJPYDh5Q68I=; b=nH4WIZH5FhLbKYpmxh05bqBoCKAlS6cWnu3cezUqb7VV1VluPBqCHpcjvDmtHuk176 TcShx4p+P6o4M6pkNrQY3ocv9nsKhwxkxD5UqfHYR7L0LqWrtAReGZrLdYAAVt8SUfR5 5fZSe10pX2jLM6HyBRP6+kWjgoNrDV691MyOQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gE6Rk3DjEstnZQ0wp4hKNzU3jyluxNoV71sfKvMiu64iEtaZ/kiyPSN/ZSdYOea5WF sB9OSF/36Yt7ROAdr7KT0sMEIG23B+pJjuWvAHNNOUrl6bDtQmFwaygm7CDmPIi5ELVj rFCcFZvbIOMURoIcF7JOTYQwK8P/gf/CqkFGM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.48.199 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:28:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1270204337.19663.16.camel@ari-31-201-04.infop6.jussieu.fr> References: <1270204337.19663.16.camel@ari-31-201-04.infop6.jussieu.fr> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:28:17 -0700 Received: by 10.231.150.195 with SMTP id z3mr1111656ibv.3.1270247297368; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Project for studies From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You probably want the git mirrors which are listed here: http://git.apache.org/ Generally speaking, you must create and submit patches in the Hadoop JIRA system to get code into Hadoop. Good luck, -ryan On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:32 AM, LEJEUNE JONATHAN wrote: > Dear project members, > > We are two french students from Universit=E9 Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris > 6), and we are working on the Hadoop project (framework mapreduce). We > are trying to modify the faults tolerance by replicating tasks (map > tasks and reduce tasks). > We are going to start tests.So we need to have an access to repository's > Hadoop. > Is it possible ? What is the procedure ? > > Thanks. > > Regards. > > Jonathan LEJEUNE and Madeleine PIFFARETTI > From general-return-1287-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 06:57:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35526 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 06:57:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 06:57:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 46838 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 06:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46591 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 06:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46583 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 06:57:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:57:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.91.198.74] (HELO wipro-blr-out02.wipro.com) (203.91.198.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:56:55 +0000 X-AuditID: cb5bdd58-b7bf7ae000006db3-7c-4bb989a08d03 Received: from blr-ec-aa03.wipro.com ( [10.201.18.42]) by wipro-blr-out02.wipro.com (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 01.F3.28083.0A989BB4; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:26:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com ([10.201.50.92]) by blr-ec-aa03.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:26:32 +0530 Received: from BLR-EC-MBX08.wipro.com ([10.201.51.212]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:26:33 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAD48D.1FD3781B" Subject: Need information on interfacing Project Voldemort with BDB Sore Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:26:24 +0530 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Need information on interfacing Project Voldemort with BDB Sore Thread-Index: AcrUjRrnbcwk0ZKVRWeebEGrHHQa7Q== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2010 06:56:33.0541 (UTC) FILETIME=[20923350:01CAD48D] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE= ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAD48D.1FD3781B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hi , I was successful in creating offline data for Project Voldemort with Read-only store and swapping the stores . But I don't find any examples where the Hadoop is interfaced with Project Voldemort with BDB stores. Please can someone share the examples. Regards, Suresh Prasad Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. =0A= =0A= The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may= contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not= the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this= e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this= message and any attachments. =0A= =0A= WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should= check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The compa= ny accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by th= is email. =0A= =0A= www.wipro.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAD48D.1FD3781B-- From general-return-1288-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 20:36:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3857 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 20:36:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 20:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 18886 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:36:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18816 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:36:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18808 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 20:36:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:36:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mona@apture.com designates 67.221.235.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.221.235.209] (HELO web06.apture.com) (67.221.235.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:35:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 1984 invoked by uid 89); 5 Apr 2010 20:35:38 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 1953, pid: 1955, t: 15.4003s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on morpheus.contegix.com X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.42.165?) (mona@apture.com@71.133.225.222) by 67-221-235-209.contegix.com with ESMTPA; 5 Apr 2010 20:35:22 -0000 From: Mona Gandhi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-134740413 Subject: Additional jar's to support input formats Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:35:16 -0700 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 --Apple-Mail-2-134740413 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Where should i add additional jar's to support different input formats = like AvroInputFormat? Here's a link to a successful build - = http://hudson.brokenco.de/job/Avro_Trunk/lastBuild/ Thanks in advance, Mona --Apple-Mail-2-134740413-- From general-return-1289-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:37:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78539 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:37:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 11486 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11359 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11349 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.73] (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:37:36 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792E05303C for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-exht02.vmware.com (pa-exht02.vmware.com [10.113.81.168]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DC7CD91E for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-exht02.vmware.com ([10.113.81.168]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:37:16 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:37:11 -0700 Subject: Any good examples? Thread-Topic: Any good examples? Thread-Index: AcrVMg95aP8lPVSgQ0aoHGnEnhi91A== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: A264 BLK+ BVNi BXd4 Br++ B+o6 CcKo CflN DdyW DqWK E4Lp FFe+ FeaB GvZp HYps Jyau;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{2EBE7596-3AB5-414E-B1F1-E67C43C75F31};egBtAGEAQAB2AG0AdwBhAHIAZQAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:37:11 GMT;QQBuAHkAIABnAG8AbwBkACAAZQB4AGEAbQBwAGwAZQBzAD8A x-cr-puzzleid: {2EBE7596-3AB5-414E-B1F1-E67C43C75F31} acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E99C6A2EXCHMBX22vmwa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E99C6A2EXCHMBX22vmwa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI all: In the test of hadoop, it is a problem to find the good example and the= test big data.Terasort is good, but the data generated by teragen is not s= table. Does Anyone has other good examples and the data source to recommend= me. Thanks for you. --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044E99C6A2EXCHMBX22vmwa_-- From general-return-1290-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:40:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78892 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:40:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:40:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 15931 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:40:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15880 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15872 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:40:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:40:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:40:48 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so67859ewy.31 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.205 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:40:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:40:26 -0700 Received: by 10.213.42.73 with SMTP id r9mr153062ebe.40.1270521626541; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any good examples? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Check out http://infochimps.org/datasets for a number of free, moderately sized, datasets. They won't be terabytes in size, but they're a good place to start if you're looking for real data to play with. On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Zhanlei Ma wrote: > HI all: > =A0 =A0In the test of hadoop, it is a problem to find the good example an= d the test big data.Terasort is good, but the data generated by teragen is = not stable. Does Anyone has other good examples and the data source to reco= mmend me. Thanks for you. > --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1291-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:50:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80041 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 26817 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:50:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26678 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:50:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26669 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:50:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.73] (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:50:25 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FF5B063 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-exht03.vmware.com (pa-exht03.vmware.com [10.16.45.223]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926C8E858 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-exht03.vmware.com ([10.16.45.223]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:03 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:01 -0700 Subject: RE: Any good examples? Thread-Topic: Any good examples? Thread-Index: AcrVMpUexkwLRP8jSP6jcS+tvVAkYgAATYnQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org VGhhbmsgRXJpYyBTYW1tZXIhDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBF cmljIFNhbW1lciBbbWFpbHRvOmVzYW1tZXJAY2xvdWRlcmEuY29tXSANClNlbnQ6IDIwMTDlubQ0 5pyINuaXpSAxMDo0MA0KVG86IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJl OiBBbnkgZ29vZCBleGFtcGxlcz8NCg0KQ2hlY2sgb3V0IGh0dHA6Ly9pbmZvY2hpbXBzLm9yZy9k YXRhc2V0cyBmb3IgYSBudW1iZXIgb2YgZnJlZSwNCm1vZGVyYXRlbHkgc2l6ZWQsIGRhdGFzZXRz LiBUaGV5IHdvbid0IGJlIHRlcmFieXRlcyBpbiBzaXplLCBidXQNCnRoZXkncmUgYSBnb29kIHBs YWNlIHRvIHN0YXJ0IGlmIHlvdSdyZSBsb29raW5nIGZvciByZWFsIGRhdGEgdG8gcGxheQ0Kd2l0 aC4NCg0KT24gTW9uLCBBcHIgNSwgMjAxMCBhdCA3OjM3IFBNLCBaaGFubGVpIE1hIDx6bWFAdm13 YXJlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IEhJIGFsbDoNCj4gwqAgwqBJbiB0aGUgdGVzdCBvZiBoYWRvb3As IGl0IGlzIGEgcHJvYmxlbSB0byBmaW5kIHRoZSBnb29kIGV4YW1wbGUgYW5kIHRoZSB0ZXN0IGJp ZyBkYXRhLlRlcmFzb3J0IGlzIGdvb2QsIGJ1dCB0aGUgZGF0YSBnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGVyYWdl biBpcyBub3Qgc3RhYmxlLiBEb2VzIEFueW9uZSBoYXMgb3RoZXIgZ29vZCBleGFtcGxlcyBhbmQg dGhlIGRhdGEgc291cmNlIHRvIHJlY29tbWVuZCBtZS4gVGhhbmtzIGZvciB5b3UuDQo+DQoNCg0K DQotLSANCkVyaWMgU2FtbWVyDQpwaG9uZTogKzEtOTE3LTI4Ny0yNjc1DQp0d2l0dGVyOiBlc2Ft bWVyDQpkYXRhOiB3d3cuY2xvdWRlcmEuY29tDQo= From general-return-1292-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 09:22:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46072 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 09:22:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 09:22:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2919 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 09:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2801 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 09:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2790 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 09:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:22:22 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o369LVWM017011 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=qzQthXmLJ+P2cF0k0l7nUqqMU9l6887+qvWMZdRgRpTuZ2Xr7/9RwjF4fGyjFQ5i Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:21:31 -0700 From: Rekha Joshi To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:21:30 -0700 Subject: Re: Additional jar's to support input formats Thread-Topic: Additional jar's to support input formats Thread-Index: AcrU/7PhUSiSrVX/RMiJJcghLL4/owAatab1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7E0FAF2DB61rekhajosyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7E0FAF2DB61rekhajosyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think its a matter of adding to -libjars as to use avro serializati= on hadoop needs some updates.Some discussion with Doug, Aaron @ MAPREDUCE-8= 15 On 4/6/10 2:05 AM, "Mona Gandhi" wrote: Where should i add additional jar's to support different input formats like= AvroInputFormat? Here's a link to a successful build - http://hudson.brokenco.de/job/Avro_Tr= unk/lastBuild/ Thanks in advance, Mona --_000_C7E0FAF2DB61rekhajosyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1293-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 14:44:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31380 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 14:44:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 55995 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55938 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55930 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 14:44:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:44:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:44:12 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so189487ewy.31 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:43:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.201 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:43:51 -0400 Received: by 10.213.52.208 with SMTP id j16mr4169868ebg.39.1270565031489; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: hadoop on demand setup: Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address From: Kevin Van Workum To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I'm trying to setup hadoop on demand (HOD) on my cluster. I'm currently unable to "allocate cluster". I'm starting hod with the following command: /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/bin/hod -c /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/conf/hodrc -t /b/01/vanw/hod/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -o "allocate ~/hod 3" --ringmaster.log-dir=/tmp -b 4 The job starts on the nodes and I see the ringmaster running on the MotherSuperior. The ringmaster-main.log file is created, but is empty. I don't see any associated processes running on the other 2 nodes in the job. The critical errors are as follows: [2010-04-06 10:34:13,630] CRITICAL/50 hadoop:298 - Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address. [2010-04-06 10:34:13,631] DEBUG/10 hadoop:631 - Cleaning up cluster id 238366.jman, as cluster could not be allocated. [2010-04-06 10:34:13,632] DEBUG/10 hadoop:635 - Calling rm.stop() [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] DEBUG/10 hadoop:637 - Returning from rm.stop() [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] CRITICAL/50 hod:401 - Cannot allocate cluster /b/01/vanw/hod [2010-04-06 10:34:14,149] DEBUG/10 hod:597 - return code: 7 The contents of the hodrc file is: [hod] stream = True java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 cluster = orange cluster-factor = 1.8 xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 debug = 4 allocate-wait-time = 3600 temp-dir = /tmp/hod [ringmaster] register = True stream = False temp-dir = /tmp/hod http-port-range = 8000-9000 work-dirs = /tmp/hod/1,/tmp/hod/2 xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 debug = 4 [hodring] stream = False temp-dir = /tmp/hod register = True java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 http-port-range = 8000-9000 xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 debug = 4 [resource_manager] queue = dque batch-home = /usr/local/torque-2.3.7 id = torque env-vars = HOD_PYTHON_HOME=/usr/local/python-2.5.5/bin/python [gridservice-mapred] external = False pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 tracker_port = 8030 info_port = 50080 [gridservice-hdfs] external = False pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 fs_port = 8020 info_port = 50070 Some other useful information: Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 Python 2.5.5 Twisted 10.0.0 zope 3.3.0 java version "1.6.0_02" -- Kevin Van Workum, PhD Sabalcore Computing Inc. Run your code on 500 processors. Sign up for a free trial account. www.sabalcore.com 877-492-8027 ext. 11 From general-return-1294-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 14:51:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33307 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 14:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 14:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 71805 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:51:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71697 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:51:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71689 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 14:51:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:51:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:51:14 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so194524ewy.31 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.201 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:50:52 -0400 Received: by 10.213.42.78 with SMTP id r14mr4206418ebe.11.1270565452133; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop on demand setup: Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address From: Kevin Van Workum To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Van Workum wrot= e: > Hello, > > I'm trying to setup hadoop on demand (HOD) on my cluster. I'm > currently unable to "allocate cluster". I'm starting hod with the > following command: > > /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/bin/hod -c > /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/conf/hodrc -t > /b/01/vanw/hod/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -o "allocate ~/hod 3" > --ringmaster.log-dir=3D/tmp -b 4 > > The job starts on the nodes and I see the ringmaster running on the > MotherSuperior. The ringmaster-main.log file is created, but is empty. > I don't see any associated processes running on the other 2 nodes in > the job. Update: After making sure debug =3D 4 was set on the nodes, I'm seeing these errors in ringmaster-main.log: [2010-04-06 10:47:43,183] DEBUG/10 ringMaster:479 - getServiceAddr name: hd= fs [2010-04-06 10:47:43,184] DEBUG/10 ringMaster:487 - getServiceAddr service: [2010-04-06 10:47:43,186] DEBUG/10 ringMaster:504 - getServiceAddr addr hdfs: not found > > The critical errors are as follows: > > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,630] CRITICAL/50 hadoop:298 - Failed to retrieve > 'hdfs' service address. > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,631] DEBUG/10 hadoop:631 - Cleaning up cluster id > 238366.jman, as cluster could not be allocated. > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,632] DEBUG/10 hadoop:635 - Calling rm.stop() > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] DEBUG/10 hadoop:637 - Returning from rm.stop() > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] CRITICAL/50 hod:401 - Cannot allocate > cluster /b/01/vanw/hod > [2010-04-06 10:34:14,149] DEBUG/10 hod:597 - return code: 7 > > The contents of the hodrc file is: > > [hod] > stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True > java-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /usr/local/jdk1= .6.0_02 > cluster =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D orange > cluster-factor =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 1.8 > xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 > debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 > allocate-wait-time =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 3600 > temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod > > [ringmaster] > register =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True > stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False > temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod > http-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8000-9000 > work-dirs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /tmp/hod/1,/tmp= /hod/2 > xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 > debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 > > [hodring] > stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False > temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod > register =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True > java-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /usr/local/jdk1= .6.0_02 > http-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8000-9000 > xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 > debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 > > [resource_manager] > queue =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D dque > batch-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/local/torq= ue-2.3.7 > id =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D torque > env-vars =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D > HOD_PYTHON_HOME=3D/usr/local/python-2.5.5/bin/python > > [gridservice-mapred] > external =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False > pkgs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/loca= l/hadoop-0.20.2 > tracker_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 8030 > info_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 50080 > > [gridservice-hdfs] > external =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False > pkgs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/loca= l/hadoop-0.20.2 > fs_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8020 > info_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 50070 > > > Some other useful information: > Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 > Python 2.5.5 > Twisted 10.0.0 > zope 3.3.0 > java version "1.6.0_02" > > -- > Kevin Van Workum, PhD > Sabalcore Computing Inc. > Run your code on 500 processors. > Sign up for a free trial account. > www.sabalcore.com > 877-492-8027 ext. 11 > --=20 Kevin Van Workum, PhD Sabalcore Computing Inc. Run your code on 500 processors. Sign up for a free trial account. www.sabalcore.com 877-492-8027 ext. 11 From general-return-1295-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:32:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95449 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 5210 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:32:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5176 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:32:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5168 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:32:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:32:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:32:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 95396 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.156]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:32:17 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBB7E30.8040602@apache.org> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:32:16 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Q about use of avro logs with hadoop streaming References: <859D76D2-50AE-4E66-974A-3B47621323F6@apture.com> In-Reply-To: <859D76D2-50AE-4E66-974A-3B47621323F6@apture.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mona Gandhi wrote: > i currently use avro version 1.3.0 to log data. I am having difficulty processing these avro logs via a map reduce job written in Python using hadoop streaming(v 0.21.0). Mona, There is currently no support for Avro data in streaming. One could use a shell command to convert Avro data to lines of text (e.g., Avro's 'tojson' tool) but that would be rather inefficient. A good approach would be something akin to Hadoop Pipes: we implement a Java mapper and reducer that use an Avro protocol to communicate with a subprocess over standard input and output, transmitting input and output records as raw binary. The subprocess would deserialize inputs, call the user-provided mapper or reducer function, then serialize outputs back. This would require no changes to Hadoop and could be included in Avro. We'd provide implementations of this protocol for the various languages, Python, Ruby, C, C++, etc., enabling high-performance mapreduce programs over Avro data for all of these. The existing Hadoop Pipes implementation would be a good starting point for this work, as it already uses the same technique, although with a Hadoop Writable-based protocol and with only a C++ implementation. I've filed an issue in Jira to track this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-512 I might have a chance to work on this later this month. Doug From general-return-1296-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 20:15:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17427 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 20:15:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 25037 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25000 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24992 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:15:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-62.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:15:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 17404 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:02 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.156]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:15:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBB9644.7020201@apache.org> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:15:00 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Avro as TLP? References: <4BB28E7C.90300@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB28E7C.90300@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug Cutting wrote: > Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns about this > proposal? Since no issues were raised, I'll now call the vote. Doug From general-return-1297-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 20:16:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17652 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 20:16:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 20:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27611 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27573 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27565 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 20:16:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-62.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:16:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 17531 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 20:15:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.156]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:15:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:15:49 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current committers as the initial members of the project management committee (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? Thanks, Doug ------------ X. Establish the Apache Avro Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to data serialization for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to data serialization; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Avro Project: * Doug Cutting * Jeff Hammerbacher * Jeff Hodges * Matt Massie * Philip Zeyliger * Scott Banachowski * Scott Carey * Sharad Agarwal * Thiruvalluvan M. G. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Avro Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1298-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 20:25:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19552 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 20:25:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 20:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 39357 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:25:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39313 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 20:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39305 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 20:25:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:25:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:25:18 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so312642pwi.35 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NcJw4HQsakholpQ5UL6K4tYLwFwUAfGmzPOiO+et4y0=; b=n8mAaqtT7kKtr+cKsja0XTJAI6jAG4kwh03elBGotmo62adZE0obXpV06UqsYKMvz8 GbbBfSd1X5D2IZ4BKzgzq3560/X1c/jGxJxWinFsMiknlo+XKOcYraR5J5nFqi4zYi9Z cou+opBtcPihiNYsIIyo3JiaZ5AzUr4vwViL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hMhrOkozjtxyz4PnkPZPjZnvfIP9ojlHlKxa1zSpnnMogG9Ryny+eKSouHSbl/2j9k GykipyJ8aFK1giDx+i7zi/zn4lyZj3D4NPqrrFu6TRwrIMZEWzpMM1bdSHe58UYU8CPn ryoRQNfRgSJU/sQ1hNphMyr8ADmKXy/YcSg5M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.20 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:24:56 -0700 Received: by 10.142.55.18 with SMTP id d18mr2812183wfa.170.1270585497158; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2bb873703470483973dbd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636b2bb873703470483973dbd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? > +1 --001636b2bb873703470483973dbd-- From general-return-1299-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 21:51:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37718 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 21:51:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 21:51:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 37959 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 21:51:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37913 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 21:51:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37905 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 21:51:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:51:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:51:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 37696 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 21:51:23 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yx0-f172.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:51:23 +0000 Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so195990yxe.2 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:51:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.147.133 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:51:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:51:22 -0700 Received: by 10.231.145.145 with SMTP id d17mr13503ibv.30.1270590682402; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? +1 -C From general-return-1300-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:02:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39823 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:02:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 47147 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:02:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47100 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47092 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:02:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:02:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.217] (HELO mail-bw0-f217.google.com) (209.85.218.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:02:20 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so345109bwz.29 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:01:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.98.16 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:01:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:01:57 -0700 Received: by 10.204.7.212 with SMTP id e20mr8521472bke.117.1270591317787; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level > Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current > committers as the initial members of the project management committee > (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. > > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? +1 Tom > > Thanks, > > Doug > > ------------ > > =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache Avro Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to data serialization > =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 related to data serialization; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be > =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibilit= y > =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Avro Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Doug Cutting =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Jeff Hammerbacher =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Jeff Hodges =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Matt Massie =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Philip Zeyliger =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Scott Banachowski =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Scott Carey =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Sharad Agarwal =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Thiruvalluvan M. G. =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie > =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to > =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apach= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > From general-return-1301-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:35:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45845 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:35:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 85683 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:35:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85611 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:35:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85602 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:35:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:35:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.64] (HELO qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:35:23 +0000 Received: from omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.87]) by qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2NAb1e00H1smiN4A7Nb4bk; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:35:04 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-152-247.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2Nai1e0032VBGtd8gNar4i; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:34:58 +0000 Message-Id: <15631D3C-EEA4-41CF-B0E9-58E54CDA1A0F@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: HBase as TLP? Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:34:39 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Stack, Was there any resolution from the HBase community about moving to a TLP? -- Owen From general-return-1302-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:45:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47761 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:45:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:45:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 96591 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:45:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96539 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:45:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96531 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:45:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:45:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:45:33 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o36MiRKg019631 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vEHZ2hw3fek0KdJse2ptkjBerHXgd53SxSvKelc/bb6T3t7dw53zMjP29L6xw4UT Message-ID: <4BBBB94B.3080502@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:44:27 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 --Konstantin On 4/6/2010 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level > Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > committers as the initial members of the project management committee > (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. > > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? > > Thanks, > > Doug > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache Avro Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to data serialization; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Avro Project: > > * Doug Cutting > * Jeff Hammerbacher > * Jeff Hodges > * Matt Massie > * Philip Zeyliger > * Scott Banachowski > * Scott Carey > * Sharad Agarwal > * Thiruvalluvan M. G. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > From general-return-1303-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 06:34:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33499 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 06:34:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 06:34:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 51366 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 06:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50169 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 06:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50151 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 06:34:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:34:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rosegun38@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:34:02 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so1282975qyk.20 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:33:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6t8EFcz6xtr35c1Z2YeI7pRgrmB0z+3WQD5QrDP67iQ=; b=UAjwx0Rk6FqHHwlVoDr+ddE0cwPN3h+Kkpqev3sF9Ghd5Ztil4RXrQSZ7vXT/o0Cf0 zVngxqwwgJfSSB9UYVxStE60JF4QKm0MCVYxqHuNwJc9Yh5C8KF1D7pUPvGhLHTXfBPR rQyBl74SzW+NtpsHPM/totNQmEVtY3bJ2Yg7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vo8lOp1b8nijOFuY8vzIBmcbtSLo97SBCYheni0l5kI1zxVtpOG+ZHqU/xgeRRw33S cls1crkD5foEbi/qY7b6GZ4TZ8uhOMSyjz4q9nPcrgQWFOrVan5vEgSR2QiFnCFxv+9r RWg09l9tDdcDIPUWX0hH8zE6GpNjy1k7Y38Ps= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.74.70 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:33:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBB9644.7020201@apache.org> References: <4BB28E7C.90300@apache.org> <4BBB9644.7020201@apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:33:41 +0800 Received: by 10.224.73.89 with SMTP id p25mr1938953qaj.82.1270622021554; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Avro as TLP? From: Jason Mark To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f93d9723d466404839fbe7f --00c09f93d9723d466404839fbe7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 2010/4/7 Doug Cutting > Doug Cutting wrote: > >> Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns about this >> proposal? >> > > Since no issues were raised, I'll now call the vote. > > Doug > --00c09f93d9723d466404839fbe7f-- From general-return-1304-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 06:46:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35017 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 06:46:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 06:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 59793 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 06:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59643 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 06:46:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59634 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 06:46:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:46:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:46:33 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.72.244.164]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o376jMjr049877 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <40BF62EE-DCAB-48CE-B063-F06243662F75@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:45:22 -0700 References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? > > Thanks, +1 Arun From general-return-1305-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 16:54:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72320 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 16:54:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 16:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 32932 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:54:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32865 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32849 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 16:53:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:53:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:53:51 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.252] ([10.73.135.252]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o37Gqmt6079801; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBCB864.6010608@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:52:52 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Doug Cutting Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Patrick On 04/06/2010 01:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level > Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > committers as the initial members of the project management committee > (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. > > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? > > Thanks, > > Doug > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache Avro Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to data serialization; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Avro Project: > > * Doug Cutting > * Jeff Hammerbacher > * Jeff Hodges > * Matt Massie > * Philip Zeyliger > * Scott Banachowski > * Scott Carey > * Sharad Agarwal > * Thiruvalluvan M. G. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1306-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:02:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75474 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:02:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:02:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 50931 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50895 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50885 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:02:36 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so2047984qyk.20 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0gqkHgtzcD90CjhcRz2cla1Nt2pLPYQnp7nUEuYueh8=; b=PAISfAGbiw8E/ZPSuXQYCA0nPCl+eYMGxyYzVqwQuP3By8tw6TI/nR6XfyZly1PwYu a1SYhTNfBm7NamzQ86ru2uZh0pCya3BK6uw0QLlPb6QzBtcGFX5N0Osu52z9aiec3BOc 4LNmDbkksjJwSh1etGS/7pmpK1xGIBIVCtp08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Rpmb0Usi8Kk77kFs51dkqd8Y5tcsb6kHZnjQOlgChDFkZRnaFQILOwiMH2MBx9cttL 71yGFV3UYESvQ3BpOdCkzycPp2MzBtyzkid40JNW7OkvGRka3APt+mdvftz9hhavpTtT id3LJvlfLw2sndWTrnSVoaBmDVxruopqNz0DU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.10.133 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:02:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15631D3C-EEA4-41CF-B0E9-58E54CDA1A0F@apache.org> References: <15631D3C-EEA4-41CF-B0E9-58E54CDA1A0F@apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:02:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1401346c14fe9599 Received: by 10.229.218.21 with SMTP id ho21mr2691684qcb.79.1270659734996; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase as TLP? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Consensus would seem to favor going to TLP. Let me run a quick vote. Will be back. Thanks, St.Ack On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Stack, > =A0 =A0Was there any resolution from the HBase community about moving to = a TLP? > > -- Owen > From general-return-1307-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:30:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82656 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:30:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:30:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 93145 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:30:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93096 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93079 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:30:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:30:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:29:57 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.252] (wifi-e-135-252.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.252]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o37HSu0N062492; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:28:56 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Owen O'Malley" , general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: ZooKeeper as TLP discussion results. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please find the results of the ZooKeeper as TLP discussion here. http://bit.ly/c4fuZT There was consensus amongst the development team that we will stay as a subproject of Hadoop for the time being. Full details of the discussion can be found in the thread provided. Patrick From general-return-1308-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:31:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82937 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 95654 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95624 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95616 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:31:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:31:08 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o37HTs01095168 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:29:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=pi2SCOF+txvgnt6KLOEmgER/KqueVABNZJS2OSl4u0kyt0kGOn2FLtuwRruv1HwT Message-Id: <11F4AE05-627B-4A41-B5D3-A497D56BC93A@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:29:53 -0700 References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 Alan. On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? From general-return-1309-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 19:01:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11427 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:01:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 3331 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 19:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3298 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 19:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3290 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 19:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:01:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 10995 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 19:00:51 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.156]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:00:51 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBCD662.80809@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:00:50 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: ZooKeeper as TLP discussion results. References: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Patrick Hunt wrote: > Please find the results of the ZooKeeper as TLP discussion here. > > http://bit.ly/c4fuZT > > There was consensus amongst the development team that we will stay as a > subproject of Hadoop for the time being. Full details of the discussion > can be found in the thread provided. In that discussion you state: > a) I do not think ZooKeeper currently has a sufficiently large and > diverse enough community such that it can fend for itself as a > TLP How does the Hadoop PMC assist Zookeeper? I see very little evidence that the Hadoop PMC is involved at all day-to-day operations of Zookeeper. Currently the Hadoop PMC must vote on new Zookeeper committers and releases. These votes usually pass with the minimum required number of PMC votes, often only after an appeal is made for more votes. This does not seem like significant oversight. Beyond that, I see little evidence of involvement by the Hadoop PMC in Zookeeper. So I don't see this as a strong argument not to become a TLP. If a group of committers is operating independently, then they ought to be an independent TLP. The fact that you're a subproject operating independently only hides the lack of diversity, it doesn't help it. > b) Loss of branding and discover-ability This also seems a poor reason to remain a sub-project. We can retain prominent links to Zookeeper from hadoop.apache.org regardless of how the projects are structured. > c) "if ain't broke don't fix it". I have frequent interactions with > Hadoop PMC/Chair and an Apache board member. That should not change as a TLP. Apache encourages cross-project communication and collaboration. The things that would change if Zookeeper were a TLP are: 1. its official website would be at zookeeper.apache.org. 2. it could vote for committers and releases directly rather than through the Hadoop PMC 3. it would submit its quarterly report to the board directly, instead of via the Hadoop PMC. That's pretty much it. The board has a well established report and review system. Each project's quarterly report is closely read and must be individually approved by a quorum of the board's members. PMCs tend not to have such a review mechanism for subprojects. Historically subprojects that develop problems have been slow to identify, and the problems have worsened in the meantime. The focus of each PMC should be on direct decisions about code, committers and releases. The board's job is to make sure that each PMC operates effectively. These are different responsibilities and require different processes. No one is going to force Zookeeper to become a TLP against its will, and no change must be made immediately. But I think such a move would be easy to make, have significant upside for the project in simplifying its formal votes, and have significant upside to the foundation in facilitating the project's direct interaction with the board. Doug From general-return-1310-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 21:44:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59888 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 21:44:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 21:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26138 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 21:44:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26082 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 21:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26074 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 21:44:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:44:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:44:08 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so731831ywh.5 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JnR0249Iin7+VnwT6Uv1xayzqka99BGOTefdp/QQ6hA=; b=jvRlAX7lPrbJ8X697JgkD+ACXlZVFDfhatAhU0WInWPqyZwSt9fAanPI7BJN/DHK/E cXa2/ARqgdJbdsGpLEDKsCsPuJj7oj2rl6liqHD59N0XOK0TupZx6ROXBeRuKtYDGl1x tLSU3GAUF4UT1QTtVTSBiUlwLmUJ2UAEc/zZA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UvTCCFfxecrR6qDn5XMgO7HI+LPhtcDBcZ3qkjxKYh6x6ZiFHLXmVhISFnvEhbV/KX 6n7F0Jnulu6/Zd2oCD0xDFmO7JrqPGsLsbmiqCAO0mKHqcfE/6wX2UA5NQDTGdchz2C7 iNkaWff3VBNIi/k4motQ+C+BJogp4FGeHzHAk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.50.17 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11F4AE05-627B-4A41-B5D3-A497D56BC93A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> <11F4AE05-627B-4A41-B5D3-A497D56BC93A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:43:47 -0700 Received: by 10.150.254.17 with SMTP id b17mr1777774ybi.36.1270676627612; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd349c00365be0483ac75c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd349c00365be0483ac75c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 -dhruba On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1 > > Alan. > > > On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? >> > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd349c00365be0483ac75c7-- From general-return-1311-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 00:04:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89249 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 00:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 00:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 56591 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 00:04:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56483 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 00:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85335 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 18:43:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1004070129 Message-id: <1F12CBA8-F3F3-4A5A-8F01-BD7B299A6DEC@mac.com> From: Nigel Daley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-reply-to: <4BBCB864.6010608@apache.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:42:31 -0700 References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> <4BBCB864.6010608@apache.org> +1 Cheers, Nige > On 04/06/2010 01:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level >> Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. >> >> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current >> committers as the initial members of the project management committee >> (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. >> >> Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Doug >> >> ------------ >> >> X. Establish the Apache Avro Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to data serialization >> for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to data serialization; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Avro Project: >> >> * Doug Cutting >> * Jeff Hammerbacher >> * Jeff Hodges >> * Matt Massie >> * Philip Zeyliger >> * Scott Banachowski >> * Scott Carey >> * Sharad Agarwal >> * Thiruvalluvan M. G. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache Avro Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> From general-return-1312-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 01:15:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4639 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 01:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 01:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 98888 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 01:15:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98825 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 01:15:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98817 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 01:15:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:15:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:14:58 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o381E9nS003787 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=UPrxJ3z9cHU69xpN9yw3dYTVP5/hlXMSX0lcvINII6TcyyWfAY50SyB122jkYWsV Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:14:09 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:14:09 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:14:08 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? From: Mahadev Konar To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? Thread-Index: AcrWuMm2x+uX32onaEWwwvvP3zi75g== In-Reply-To: <1F12CBA8-F3F3-4A5A-8F01-BD7B299A6DEC@mac.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2010 01:14:09.0830 (UTC) FILETIME=[CACDEC60:01CAD6B8] +1... Thanks mahadev On 4/7/10 11:42 AM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > Nige > >> On 04/06/2010 01:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >>> Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level >>> Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. >>> >>> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current >>> committers as the initial members of the project management committee >>> (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. >>> >>> Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Doug >>> >>> ------------ >>> >>> X. Establish the Apache Avro Project >>> >>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>> open-source software related to data serialization >>> for distribution at no charge to the public. >>> >>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", >>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >>> Foundation; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is >>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >>> related to data serialization; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be >>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >>> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >>> of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility >>> for management of the projects within the scope of >>> responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>> Apache Avro Project: >>> >>> * Doug Cutting >>> * Jeff Hammerbacher >>> * Jeff Hodges >>> * Matt Massie >>> * Philip Zeyliger >>> * Scott Banachowski >>> * Scott Carey >>> * Sharad Agarwal >>> * Thiruvalluvan M. G. >>> >>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie >>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to >>> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >>> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >>> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >>> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is >>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >>> encourage open development and increased participation in the >>> Apache Avro Project; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby >>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >>> Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further >>> >>> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >>> Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the >>> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >>> From general-return-1313-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 02:30:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14004 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 02:30:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 02:30:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 59425 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:30:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59369 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59361 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 02:30:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:30:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.215] (HELO web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:29:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 23865 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2010 02:29:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1270693771; bh=BPsm2o1/VcRqikYn2dtQo+tiouax/u4eNE02efuGFWk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jh10qbwu+cfCvEr8ZObvrauYI4QzBP81xS2mYSUEq9M3n3oevxY5cNIyvC0EgEKTNL/rD/vGjf+njINPYssBTz8i8z4aDXj+90/qR9RMN6lil8EW3vohYijXxcpRgRclo8r9uHR4RxtD5YEkjx8ApfXg0Cu0CyQq8FyctM89/CY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nEIwyAaBJ2dfSLcT2XaINDwVk8swE09sZ8bZYUw5q9xjylf3wvccExrNg4zEqYZ2R0dVeqphsV0chaazY+2lHlU8m2lgFIA5zrIYdY02d6TQzd2TB2rfaNpo8PYPZhovypR2jwd/vYvMZXXsefBOCi2JNiTOQF8jx0m3EfCzvAw=; Message-ID: <434909.23548.qm@web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: XAdBf0gVM1k2NpvXMVxaWPPex1WkyoKb4.VYlC4ZFjWH4BX 8igjJrVWN0OkYXqbFmoWLucQOASYEU0gRCBnKX7mUuaW4aeHdo4tJY4xzJuJ aK8dbw0JFiOiQiZO12Wq8qPquuHnf_5oagluqz6NO6WLf7IFJ9M3SKS47hki 9YCJyZAADaZ2cX7f.2dR_sZQsdWZZzZwdQZjt4U_WXQzbKcCMHps8VaFJJ_O U1WBt14hSWgIYTwI29JMpCxV9K5UGjdyh7pUIMIAtW6fNZasGmlTqHekgruC egTlWx94OCFPFB_cD_BSVnTRU5Gcl73bsjMEXq6ziS0UVrtC4nFw6jExbNBt BNg-- Received: from [98.207.82.20] by web56206.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:29:31 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/324.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:29:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Nicholas Sze ----- Original Message ---- > From: Doug Cutting > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, April 6, 2010 1:15:49 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Avro as TLP? > > Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level Apache > project, as mentioned previously on this list. I've included below a > draft board resolution. It lists all current committers as the initial > members of the project management committee (PMC) and Matt Massie as the > initial chair. Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to > the board? Thanks, Doug ------------ > X. Establish the Apache Avro Project WHEREAS, the > Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests > of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's > purpose to establish a Project Management Committee > charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization for > distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, > THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, > that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to data serialization; and be it further > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the > chair of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary > responsibility for management of the projects within > the scope of responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; > and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed > immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve > as the initial members of the Apache Avro > Project: * Doug Cutting > < > href="mailto:cutting@apache.org">cutting@apache.org> > * Jeff Hammerbacher < > ymailto="mailto:hammer@apache.org" > href="mailto:hammer@apache.org">hammer@apache.org> > * Jeff Hodges < > ymailto="mailto:jmhodges@apache.org" > href="mailto:jmhodges@apache.org">jmhodges@apache.org> > * Matt Massie < > ymailto="mailto:massie@apache.org" > href="mailto:massie@apache.org">massie@apache.org> > * Philip Zeyliger < > ymailto="mailto:philz@apache.org" > href="mailto:philz@apache.org">philz@apache.org> > * Scott Banachowski < > ymailto="mailto:sbanacho@apache.org" > href="mailto:sbanacho@apache.org">sbanacho@apache.org> > * Scott Carey < > ymailto="mailto:scottcarey@apache.org" > href="mailto:scottcarey@apache.org">scottcarey@apache.org> > * Sharad Agarwal < > ymailto="mailto:sharadag@apache.org" > href="mailto:sharadag@apache.org">sharadag@apache.org> > * Thiruvalluvan M. G. < > ymailto="mailto:thiru@apache.org" > href="mailto:thiru@apache.org">thiru@apache.org> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, > to serve in accordance with and subject to the > direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of > the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, > removal or disqualification, or until a successor is > appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the > initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is tasked with > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage > open development and increased participation in the > Apache Avro Project; and be it further RESOLVED, > that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is tasked > with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1314-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:03:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32946 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:03:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:03:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 36199 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:03:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36100 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36092 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:03:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:03:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:03:14 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so2844930qyk.20 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:02:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=V8FjidTOtuvZGjz+pl41aE2iEaiwvSSE9TQuhBd3ftk=; b=qB7b2SVsAZ2+UFt0LECZkGgLRXSyGZpF//1fesjWGLPhzDT1XOTazFVfWGfJL7rrCp kP7dG0uhZFKHqP9TD+JIe0cKvKQYVZuTjaE2s0z2ohLPUF2VynO77MforKeqv7GTvsoD 43qB8f8dK7x4mjQfGjQYdfhDNJG41RKregrYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=dLesiwaamS+18XNj9nFf1jZaGU///hUHW415QomrNo2BYwMyfTBin+GwTxLywcpMeL 3gNC+ykrMHywA9JYuV4UD7PwHfQOzMnYDNDCuryu3/dNa0tPDoTpHZBedTIf34RZg1B6 7N/Gd8+ZweOlOffhXJfo50dZiHghOtt9t/oyY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.10.133 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:02:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 84aad20640e708a3 Received: by 10.229.211.140 with SMTP id go12mr1117964qcb.32.1270699374139; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The HBase subproject has voted to become a TLP: http://su.pr/1g0HAN Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns about this proposal? Please don't vote yet in response to this. I'll call a formal vote after questions, if any, have been resolved. Thanks, St.Ack (Thanks for the boiler plate Doug Cutting) From general-return-1315-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 08:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78422 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 08:42:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 08:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 57248 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 08:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57167 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 08:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57159 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 08:42:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:42:14 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so81110wwb.35 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUe1xjSRJFSXi5eJQ7BQFRXHMQFd3UDwImepJlsvZR0=; b=vyL+/NcaSnC/Lagax5wcXOEYydH0UxU3x/tYFvANqHlyNpgyxij4IAG1lfaCRm/eup GihiGPr3yJJTujG9PzFqaeIeIT6juAcF+ttYJwVlCi7bAhOLyyRUf3ki1/IbWsWiQm7l UHw2ajgzWelxPpEdzYvK2JQ6ASl3n1cpWHX1s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J+PL/PTXyHapiGJ11LbtJBhgTOPXThgqYCoPl6qRcOozr6pgbaVIJgYn9+jaXBZvyi cxir8a1n5Bf2rz4oJWHskuC3tCZgvdmfqQ6NmvGDr49Ra5IURpu00i2u0xBNQWazrQO1 aLDIYu5UojLqIFTvr8arN0slH4tDYzGqRvuCs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.35 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBCD662.80809@apache.org> References: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> <4BBCD662.80809@apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:41:54 +0200 Received: by 10.216.165.5 with SMTP id d5mr86247wel.143.1270716114409; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZooKeeper as TLP discussion results. From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 21:00, Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> Please find the results of the ZooKeeper as TLP discussion here. >> >> http://bit.ly/c4fuZT >> >> There was consensus amongst the development team that we will stay as a >> subproject of Hadoop for the time being. Full details of the discussion = can >> be found in the thread provided. > > In that discussion you state: >> a) I do not think ZooKeeper currently has a sufficiently large and >> diverse enough community such that it can fend for itself as a >> TLP > > How does the Hadoop PMC assist Zookeeper? =A0I see very little evidence t= hat > the Hadoop PMC is involved at all day-to-day operations of Zookeeper. > =A0Currently the Hadoop PMC must vote on new Zookeeper committers and > releases. =A0These votes usually pass with the minimum required number of= PMC > votes, often only after an appeal is made for more votes. =A0This does no= t > seem like significant oversight. =A0Beyond that, I see little evidence of > involvement by the Hadoop PMC in Zookeeper. =A0So I don't see this as a s= trong > argument not to become a TLP. > > If a group of committers is operating independently, then they ought to b= e > an independent TLP. =A0The fact that you're a subproject operating > independently only hides the lack of diversity, it doesn't help it. > >> b) Loss of branding and discover-ability > > This also seems a poor reason to remain a sub-project. =A0We can retain > prominent links to Zookeeper from hadoop.apache.org regardless of how the > projects are structured. > >> c) "if ain't broke don't fix it". I have frequent interactions with >> Hadoop PMC/Chair and an Apache board member. > > That should not change as a TLP. =A0Apache encourages cross-project > communication and collaboration. > > The things that would change if Zookeeper were a TLP are: > =A01. its official website would be at zookeeper.apache.org. > =A02. it could vote for committers and releases directly rather than thro= ugh > the Hadoop PMC > =A03. it would submit its quarterly report to the board directly, instead= of > via the Hadoop PMC. > > That's pretty much it. > > The board has a well established report and review system. =A0Each projec= t's > quarterly report is closely read and must be individually approved by a > quorum of the board's members. =A0PMCs tend not to have such a review > mechanism for subprojects. =A0Historically subprojects that develop probl= ems > have been slow to identify, and the problems have worsened in the meantim= e. > =A0The focus of each PMC should be on direct decisions about code, commit= ters > and releases. =A0The board's job is to make sure that each PMC operates > effectively. =A0These are different responsibilities and require differen= t > processes. > > No one is going to force Zookeeper to become a TLP against its will, and = no > change must be made immediately. =A0But I think such a move would be easy= to > make, have significant upside for the project in simplifying its formal > votes, and have significant upside to the foundation in facilitating the > project's direct interaction with the board. > > Doug +1 to all of this. Additional comments. If there would be 3 Zookeeper committers on the Hadoop PMC, then the lack-of-oversight problem would go away and releases could be voted on without delay. I don't want to discuss why this currently is like it is - this should really be discussed on private@hadoop.a.o. However, going TLP requires experienced people. That means Zookeeper will probably need Hadoop PMC members or others (ASF members, etc) to join the initial PMC. Otherwise, in my opinion the proper path could either be Zookeeper growing up here for a while until a proper PMC can be forked from Hadoop, or going through - hold your breath - incubation. You know, this whole umbrella discussion should not result in a mass exodus into TLPs which might collapse sooner or later. Bernd From general-return-1316-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 09:25:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85412 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 09:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 09:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2359 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 09:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2285 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 09:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2276 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 09:25:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:25:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.73] (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:25:42 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F55B460B5 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-exht02.vmware.com (pa-exht02.vmware.com [10.113.81.168]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913CBDC297 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-exht02.vmware.com ([10.113.81.168]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:25:21 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:25:17 -0700 Subject: reserch the code of hadoop Thread-Topic: reserch the code of hadoop Thread-Index: AcrW/WcPsoK+yk6cR9WGwhHU1vPAIA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EA8910AEXCHMBX22vmwa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EA8910AEXCHMBX22vmwa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI all: We know the fault tolence of hadoop when a datanode is failed, as runnin= g hadoop. Howerver which source part resolving the situation? And how to so= lve? Looking forward your reply. Best regards and thanks! zma --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EA8910AEXCHMBX22vmwa_-- From general-return-1317-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 10:09:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92186 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 10:09:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 10:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 53424 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 10:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53232 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 10:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53220 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 10:09:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:09:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:08:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303731BA4FA for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:08:37 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yulPgOlqC8mw for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:08:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C061BA4EF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:08:36 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271326104.79577@lGz9BcdwogcuL6P/BlGsaA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o38A8KnF007748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:08:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BBDAB14.1050806@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:08:20 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: reserch the code of hadoop References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o38A8KnF007748 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Zhanlei Ma wrote: > HI all: > We know the fault tolence of hadoop when a datanode is failed, as running hadoop. >Howerver which source part resolving the situation? And how to solve? stuff in hadoop-hdfs; get on the hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org mailing list to discuss these problems. Namenode: needs some way of feeding changes to peers in a (changing, volatile) set of namenodes such that any can failover to become the primary, or you do a complete -any NN accepts operations- world and you are in the domain of HA distributed databases, along with the performance problems datanode: rebinding on failure dfsclient: move away from a single DNS URL and do some rebinding lookup This is all serious code and hard to test; everyone running production clusters would like HA, but not at the expense of performance *or any of their existing data*. You need to start talking to Yahoo! and Facebook before you begin touching the code to understand their needs, as the big datacentre teams will veto any change that doesn't work for them. The problems of small clusters, where small is a few hundred TB on tens of servers, are considered dealt with and it is the big facilities where the problems turn up. This is why the historical focus has been on rapid recovery and (ideally) zero data loss over continuous availability -steve From general-return-1318-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 16:11:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83945 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 16:11:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 16:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22142 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 16:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21963 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 16:11:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21955 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 16:11:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:11:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:11:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 83900 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 16:11:03 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.103]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:11:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBE0016.4020502@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:11:02 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: ZooKeeper as TLP discussion results. References: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> <4BBCD662.80809@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bernd Fondermann wrote: > However, going TLP requires experienced people. That means Zookeeper > will probably need Hadoop PMC members or others (ASF members, etc) to > join the initial PMC. The Hadoop PMC should use criteria similar to the Incubator for graduation to TLP. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements The only requirement in doubt is diversity. Those diversity requirements are soft, not hard and fast. When I raised this, several board members indicated that they would rather have non-diverse TLPs than non-diverse subprojects, since the board could then directly observe whether diversity is improving within the project, and, if it is not, provide assistance. > Otherwise, in my opinion the proper path could either be Zookeeper > growing up here for a while until a proper PMC can be forked from > Hadoop, or going through - hold your breath - incubation. These projects are already effectively in incubation, under the Hadoop PMC rather than under the Incubator PMC. The question today is whether they're ready to graduate. The board has asked for a report on this. We need not rush into anything. If we have doubts about some cases, then our report to the board might include questions about the criteria to promote subprojects to TLP, to help clarify things. If we, as a PMC, wish to wait for diversity in a subproject to improve, then we must commit to regular monitoring that subproject's diversity, and, if it's not improving, try to figure out why, and act to help it improve. Just as podlings should not languish in the incubator for years, a sub-project's goal should be promotion to TLP within a year or so of founding. If we don't want to commit to this oversight, then either the board or the incubator PMC could. Doug From general-return-1319-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 16:53:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92841 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 16:53:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 16:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 85237 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 16:53:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85162 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 16:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85146 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 16:53:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:53:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:52:55 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.250] (wifi-e-135-250.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.250]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o38GqHKv013419; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BBE09C1.6010706@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:52:17 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Doug Cutting Subject: Re: ZooKeeper as TLP discussion results. References: <4BBCC0D8.1030407@apache.org> <4BBCD662.80809@apache.org> <4BBE0016.4020502@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBE0016.4020502@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/08/2010 09:11 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Graduation+Requirements I can speak only for ZK but we are hitting on all cylinders from this list. All the process/infra/legal items have long ago been committed. We have strong partnerships with multiple Apache projects (HBase and Solr in particular) and a dedication to "the apache way". > The only requirement in doubt is diversity. If you read through the full thread, and not just the snippets Doug pulled, you would see a strong community and commitment to both increasing diversity and gaining TLP status. The hurdle we face today wrt diversity is that while usage is picking up, it's been historically hard for us to gain contributors. This is primarily due to the fact that we have a) highly targeted & complex project, and b) relatively mature project and user base. We are not a new project, where the majority of code is yet to be written. We are working to increase diversity, (again, see the thread for some discussion of this) however it's slow going. Recently we have seen a big upswing in users (twitter, digg, Solr, Cassandra, Neo4j, etc...) due to our efforts at evangelism. The hope is that these new users, along with some new areas for development, would stimulate contributor growth. If you have any ideas or could provide help in this area please feel free to discuss on our dev list. Patrick From general-return-1320-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 17:14:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98689 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 17:14:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 17:14:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20035 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:14:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19989 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19981 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 17:14:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:13:56 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o38HCqFR021775 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=wZGE3hrHNA33/WomZ10R5Fw+vdsZTgQKrR1C/XymJyEkQIhE4c/9khJIELxXojYv Message-Id: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:12:52 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I have a concern. HDFS, mapreduce, Hbase, Hive, and Pig taken together form a coherent software stack. I suspect that many users see this as a whole, in the same way they see a Linux distribution as a whole, without remembering that Linux is really the kernel while other GNU components are added into the distribution. HDFS and mapreduce form a base on which the other projects depend. Hbase, Hive, and Pig function to extend the base to many more users, both in terms of making it easier to use and bringing new functionality. Thus splitting them up does not make sense to me. They form a whole, why not keep them as a whole? I know that the response will be that becoming a top level project doesn't mean they cannot continue to function as a whole; that this is merely a governance issue and not an issue of how projects work together (see for example http://bit.ly/9ylAYS). But I remain skeptical. The structure of governing hierarchies always influence cohesion of a group. It would help me if advocates of this position could point to successful, separate Apache TLPs that are either completely dependent on another project (as HBase would be on Hadoop) or significantly dependent to extend functionality (as Hadoop would be on Hbase). This is not to say that I do not understand the value of having PMCs from these growing subprojects report directly to Apache. But I am concerned that we are letting this valid concern overrule other equally valid concerns without considering the tradeoffs. Alan. On Apr 7, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Stack wrote: > The HBase subproject has voted to become a TLP: http://su.pr/1g0HAN > > Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns about this > proposal? > > Please don't vote yet in response to this. I'll call a formal vote > after questions, if any, have been resolved. > > Thanks, > St.Ack > (Thanks for the boiler plate Doug Cutting) From general-return-1321-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 17:28:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4164 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 44286 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44240 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44232 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 17:28:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:28:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:28:49 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o38HS0S4028162 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=wvfOdQMvscjKfJNmLaEwSlaPXW92mYwY9JpPAvHeunX3yXzbujMQmPUgjnxEMA/i Message-Id: <41E8B39D-3CF2-4415-B4D2-9CD37C4FF26F@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Pig as TLP discussion Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:28:00 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You can find the discussion of Pig becoming a TLP here: http://www.mail-archive.com/pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg08589.html As the discussion was varied I will not attempt to summarize it other than to note that the majority of voters felt that Pig should not become a TLP at this time. Alan. From general-return-1322-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 17:51:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14668 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 17:51:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 17:51:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 96489 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:51:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96453 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 17:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96445 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 17:51:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:51:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:51:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 14590 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 17:50:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.103]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:50:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBE1780.1080102@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:50:56 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alan Gates wrote: > It would help me if advocates of this position could point to > successful, separate Apache TLPs that are either completely dependent on > another project (as HBase would be on Hadoop) or significantly dependent > to extend functionality (as Hadoop would be on Hbase). HTTPD requires APR. Jackrabbit, Roller and probably others require Lucene. Nutch requires Hadoop. Continuum and others require Derby. Doug From general-return-1323-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 22:06:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82401 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 22:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 22:06:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 92500 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:06:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92457 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92449 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 22:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-61.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:06:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 82239 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 22:06:07 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.103]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:06:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4BBE534E.4030805@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:06:06 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Pig as TLP discussion References: <41E8B39D-3CF2-4415-B4D2-9CD37C4FF26F@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <41E8B39D-3CF2-4415-B4D2-9CD37C4FF26F@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alan Gates wrote: > As the discussion was varied I will not attempt to summarize it other > than to note that the majority of voters felt that Pig should not become > a TLP at this time. Fundamentally the question should not be, "do you want to become a TLP" but rather "why can't you become a TLP"? Compelling answers might be: - "Because we're actually not a distinct community. Most of our committers are also active in other parts of Hadoop. We're a separate code tree so we can release on separate cycles." or perhaps - "Because most of our code is still coming in batched commits from a single company. All the real development is happening in their private repository, not in public with community involvement." The former would indicate that you should perhaps remain in Hadoop indefinitely. The latter would indicate that the Hadoop PMC should help your developers understand the importance of community development at Apache, or, failing that, encourage your code to leave Apache for Github, Google Code or Sourceforge, which has no such requirements. Apache's mission is to support, open collaborative development. Organizationally, each independent developer community, once it's operating, should ideally report directly to the board. I saw no such compelling arguments in the discussion you cited. Did I miss them? Alternately, the Hadoop PMC could decide it wishes to continue to flout the advice of the board against umbrella projects. If we did this, we might consider developing an internal, regularly scheduled, subproject review process. We could present this process to the board as part of our rationale for keeping several subprojects. Doug From general-return-1324-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:15:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2016 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:15:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 93341 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93290 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93282 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:15:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:15:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:15:30 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so4364251qyk.20 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L9vmAMBhUCUT/mRBpMozdR3PSLCQqdiDUAk1+fvTbgg=; b=BGvyVSbJ6IOyhSIfalPTPviY4T3k4CtLLLxWRYwsga8uZpFfFz0+M/ovfuLkiqtl3e s7Kw6b634oCohFRVQfvvthPhtpgUxNnkf4gNyYEMbFgjz4gtgGSxTGsDEZiOWsqSUmF+ Mpr0xZl5oOIB69+z3wCkSgKb/3je91o/8YsEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=wwMn/7ct49H6KhfKwkr3qmW53ArI2y86AVJmK4h3CuwAaMm2agi6AqVA5Aw1SeWZ4L QvlN+u4UYzKtByir/erchdgeHcWQJ3Tnx4aE7yN2hLekWYCau3A02WPBcjJ6BS3CBvX8 9rktaM3PeYC8OIDX/rItf0L55+4Xr0X6y5Taw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.10.133 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:15:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 596469d0a421a024 Received: by 10.229.99.143 with SMTP id u15mr1230822qcn.105.1270772109290; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I have a concern. =A0HDFS, mapreduce, Hbase, Hive, and Pig taken together= form > a coherent software stack. ... if it had been designed by Dr. Frankenstein (half-joke!). I think it a stretch describing the Hadoop suite 'coherent'. Pieces in the above stack can be swapped out and other components that do similar function put in their place. Rare is the install that uses all of the elements above (and the above is not a complete list of all Hadoop subprojects). Some of the components have inter-dependencies but others have no dependency on other subprojects at all and can be run w/o reference to other pieces of the Hadoop set. For many, Hadoop looks more like a 'bucket' of software than it is a 'coherent' software stack. I'm trying to undo the premise upon which the rest of your mail depends. St.Ack From general-return-1325-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 01:42:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21441 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 01:42:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 01:42:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 65922 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 01:42:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65872 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 01:42:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65864 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 01:42:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:42:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:42:02 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so1425136ywh.5 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:41:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hmidAE7DwD06PGoMOrnXACMpvwLspGScCTmL5YS0y+M=; b=R58gzJG2mO0g30xCp8ej06bKsmDI1Ud8BLQhHtznL5qdYfLtxFP+TiMkBxOyU0jIsD pb+Mk9w7EaHWHMCEGgZOuyCgV7D6mdbg183rk7rmiqXeewAqLWB04FWl6FXjElBIGAsc hnvBydQ0bXI/wpFGAJSASq9iRqd9jhelw2CLE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JfkKRLkYr7ANVNvXcn+HEhLgQ422Plp+p9mnpmZcqaPq+xlG97OE/6UNjN0KVx6eSM UQNVdybN1er6luXM5KzZAEJIEFHR1r1DRom/W0Nz+9ZfXjD7Sz2t1vSBvbjZT41WLI0M gzeMQaImnyn33mOkkHiPwrSdL1nTQndjYBsWw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.201.9 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:41:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:41:41 -0400 Received: by 10.100.236.21 with SMTP id j21mr1590676anh.67.1270777301055; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2b5ea9e3ad50483c3e5ba --001636b2b5ea9e3ad50483c3e5ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What if the projects were: A) split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that level of individual community but, B) The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out of it? That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a 1.0 release, if there's a reference build then it'll make it easier to identify/fix cross-component bugs and the release process might surface more of them early. It seems like that could help with a number of St.Ack's concerns about reanimated monsters. Maybe it could be owned by the Common project, with participation from the project leads? Just an idea. -Jay On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Stack wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > > I have a concern. HDFS, mapreduce, Hbase, Hive, and Pig taken together > form > > a coherent software stack. > > ... if it had been designed by Dr. Frankenstein (half-joke!). > > I think it a stretch describing the Hadoop suite 'coherent'. Pieces > in the above stack can be swapped out and other components that do > similar function put in their place. Rare is the install that uses > all of the elements above (and the above is not a complete list of all > Hadoop subprojects). Some of the components have inter-dependencies > but others have no dependency on other subprojects at all and can be > run w/o reference to other pieces of the Hadoop set. For many, Hadoop > looks more like a 'bucket' of software than it is a 'coherent' > software stack. > > I'm trying to undo the premise upon which the rest of your mail depends. > St.Ack > --001636b2b5ea9e3ad50483c3e5ba-- From general-return-1326-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 02:03:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25967 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 02:03:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 02:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 80425 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:03:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80360 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80351 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 02:03:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:03:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:03:41 +0000 Received: from wlan-guest-164.corp.yahoo.com ([10.72.76.118]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o39221bQ097071 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:02:01 -0700 References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > What if the projects were: > > A) split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that > level of > individual community > > but, > > B) The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build > containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want > out of > it? > > That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a > 1.0 > release, 1.0 release of what? Arun From general-return-1327-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 03:40:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42187 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 03:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 03:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 39831 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 03:40:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39794 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 03:40:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39786 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 03:40:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 03:40:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 03:40:42 +0000 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so1510913gwa.35 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:40:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TCvgiOjL25YQgpJAGCxEFU3ZACzk4QJPOadXazZotIo=; b=mxqWJLcI6yH4Y1+0LuNHYApm/1ysE9FO6J9No+jxbjcT2AUb+VHl2bVi4pCqfggYCw kzk1ihSAjf9SJ07guHAdFAB5HkzUcCEcRWGftSHJc22dQ+fucNU6G6JbBPGJZfWcifSJ AKWbpJ/QQlwgogyaKLN++spJLv23Di4Eq48WY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZWDf3euX42oDb2arE90HkQIHwBWwN30UWNvaEql5JV5+cBrHZzGU2+BXCxkUiaKcsX 9m/h39KdRNLOX2lZS3FGO2dAYid/cLq0EbNvRrwijStDoHXR5rt5HP94kraL939ZPaJs ztOuEfUGvbmWGNlCZ/dkEE6UfNfHcm33JWcL0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.201.9 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:40:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:40:21 -0400 Received: by 10.101.137.13 with SMTP id p13mr1542325ann.199.1270784421238; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68ee28c0399d10483c58eea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68ee28c0399d10483c58eea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Not sure exactly what I meant by "1.0 of what", "Hadoop" I guess, I was trying to address the concerns raised, which I share -- Alan's concern is that if the projects are completely separate from each other, that might decrease visibility as to the demands they're placing on each other when integrated, and St.Ack mentioned the frankenstein factor which I think we've all felt some pain from, and which may get worse after the project split. What's the standard way to deploy the three, even? Is there one? If the PMCs jointly maintained some sort of 'stable integrated build' which took in new releases from the TLPs as they were released after a soak period, it could provide a common touchstone that bugs could be tested against and cross-component patches delivered against, potentially increasing visibility of cross-component issues while providing a less cobbled-together system to administrate. On the other side, though, if executed wrong, you'd be creating a committee of committees and possibly undoing some of the benefits of going TLP in the first place, especially if politics heat up over what goes into the 'standard' build. I think it could be viable though. On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > > What if the projects were: >> >> A) split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that level of >> individual community >> >> but, >> >> B) The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build >> containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out of >> it? >> >> That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a 1.0 >> release, >> > > > 1.0 release of what? > > Arun > --0016e68ee28c0399d10483c58eea-- From general-return-1328-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 04:01:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44770 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 04:01:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 04:01:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 52742 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:01:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52594 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52586 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 04:01:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:01:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.217] (HELO mail-bw0-f217.google.com) (209.85.218.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:01:18 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2336112bwz.29 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:00:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.56.133 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:00:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:00:57 -0700 Received: by 10.204.19.137 with SMTP id a9mr1217569bkb.24.1270785657949; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eclipse does big bang releases of multiple components, but I believe it requires a huge amount of coordination and planning. Instead, I think the direction Hadoop should move in is to stabilize and clearly demarcate its core filesystem and MapReduce interfaces, so that projects like HBase, Pig, and Hive can run against multiple versions of core. Their release cycles are already largely decoupled from core, so the question about whether they become TLPs is more to do with project governance than with release coordination. Cheers, Tom On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > Not sure exactly what I meant by "1.0 of what", "Hadoop" I guess, I was > trying to address the concerns raised, which I share -- Alan's concern is > that if the projects are completely separate from each other, that might > decrease visibility as to the demands they're placing on each other when > integrated, and St.Ack mentioned the frankenstein factor which I think we= 've > all felt some pain from, and which may get worse after the project split. > What's the standard way to deploy the three, even? =A0Is there one? > > If the PMCs jointly maintained some sort of 'stable integrated build' whi= ch > took in new releases from the TLPs as they were released after a soak > period, it could provide a common touchstone that bugs could be tested > against and cross-component patches delivered against, potentially > increasing visibility of cross-component issues while providing a less > cobbled-together system to administrate. =A0On the other side, though, if > executed wrong, you'd be creating a committee of committees and possibly > undoing some of the benefits of going TLP in the first place, especially = if > politics heat up over what goes into the 'standard' build. =A0I think it = could > be viable though. > > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> >> On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: >> >> =A0What if the projects were: >>> >>> A) =A0split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that level= of >>> individual community >>> >>> but, >>> >>> B) =A0The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build >>> containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out = of >>> it? >>> >>> That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a 1.0 >>> release, >>> >> >> >> 1.0 release of what? >> >> Arun >> > From general-return-1329-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 04:07:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45403 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 04:07:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 04:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 55081 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55046 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55038 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 04:07:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:07:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of imyousuf@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:07:34 +0000 Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1461597vws.35 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JRM4Cu3nxqlKDdI4xkbJJMbI4JOKEyxxPHPmqcDdV+o=; b=vcInwbAtKp6V0Pq4ulojyZFqgovHTgEPOb1e/V78mUqqVmYevjn6s/9AUEST14FMAa Pr4Ag2Hy7Xxky7WvF84N0T8do2MLx4kpBA83CI8DqBjHiEehutYW7FUteFXLz3gg+8LS 3hTErP6d8uHezUaTE4J83TkJ3Eqh7iysRTdrg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S7hlJIvukWkp/UVoqdSHnKnroOF9U/2k+voVDL9oQjhKt6Y/biFR6+Nu/Q9gGAWAt3 BqoaOumDkS7+mlWs2cJKhPYalNJUWdcub+yX1Ih0OTT4aBkfMFWFdCeHUQoTbZ1ZPJt/ MyX+dwOE8yeteQwM+F0RzjNhQhy3jTKrwvp7c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.100.210 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:52:13 +0545 Received: by 10.220.62.204 with SMTP id y12mr741241vch.186.1270786033117; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Imran M Yousuf To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 I feel the same. From following HBase seeing its releases depending directly on Hadoop release gets me thinking... Best regards, Imran On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Tom White wrote: > Eclipse does big bang releases of multiple components, but I believe > it requires a huge amount of coordination and planning. Instead, I > think the direction Hadoop should move in is to stabilize and clearly > demarcate its core filesystem and MapReduce interfaces, so that > projects like HBase, Pig, and Hive can run against multiple versions > of core. Their release cycles are already largely decoupled from core, > so the question about whether they become TLPs is more to do with > project governance than with release coordination. > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jay Booth wrote: >> Not sure exactly what I meant by "1.0 of what", "Hadoop" I guess, I was >> trying to address the concerns raised, which I share -- Alan's concern i= s >> that if the projects are completely separate from each other, that might >> decrease visibility as to the demands they're placing on each other when >> integrated, and St.Ack mentioned the frankenstein factor which I think w= e've >> all felt some pain from, and which may get worse after the project split= . >> What's the standard way to deploy the three, even? =A0Is there one? >> >> If the PMCs jointly maintained some sort of 'stable integrated build' wh= ich >> took in new releases from the TLPs as they were released after a soak >> period, it could provide a common touchstone that bugs could be tested >> against and cross-component patches delivered against, potentially >> increasing visibility of cross-component issues while providing a less >> cobbled-together system to administrate. =A0On the other side, though, i= f >> executed wrong, you'd be creating a committee of committees and possibly >> undoing some of the benefits of going TLP in the first place, especially= if >> politics heat up over what goes into the 'standard' build. =A0I think it= could >> be viable though. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote= : >> >>> >>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: >>> >>> =A0What if the projects were: >>>> >>>> A) =A0split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that leve= l of >>>> individual community >>>> >>>> but, >>>> >>>> B) =A0The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build >>>> containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out= of >>>> it? >>>> >>>> That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a 1.= 0 >>>> release, >>>> >>> >>> >>> 1.0 release of what? >>> >>> Arun >>> >> > --=20 Imran M Yousuf Entrepreneur & Software Engineer Smart IT Engineering Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: imran@smartitengineering.com Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/ Mobile: +880-1711402557 From general-return-1330-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 06:10:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59910 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 06:10:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 06:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 28137 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 06:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28032 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 06:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28024 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 06:10:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:10:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:10:16 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1549675gyf.35 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DicNeCDD552o3UUGdrTWUeQXdnBJSck/KI0f/J2v7Vs=; b=vTDpa1G3jUqM3nZ5BjTTzQOR0uYPsvijPkltG/j6shyczS1j3KcinvmR4/9W6X7iSy Gf4WNHXbtk1h5/3l7d/Ec+O2R1gDPJfB7oTCgHAoIXR5+tFE9e8oBmfUvH/KUqleRZbw VGs4ljKNDNgBA9E+nJ+ZC/MO0sVDoqM/CAano= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J93Ze785EUMOO0jl2iz7ytNDM5yhJgyCFsTXPbANmks3XlxkTcTwmQq1a4q7D+kFxW S1Y3Jc5uVWiZ4nSIYNEJIFH8B1v9EFYSyEUfrKe0p2ARcxAAYjCw6tHVf6qTnrsUsCgN izyPTgZiqVRW61x7bQiGsqNV4x2OwywbpF+QE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.201.9 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:09:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:09:54 -0400 Received: by 10.101.136.33 with SMTP id o33mr1894029ann.63.1270793394269; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d3496ad942aa0483c7a442 --001636d3496ad942aa0483c7a442 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Alright, I totally agree. Thanks for putting it that way. -Jay On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Imran M Yousuf wrote: > +1 > > I feel the same. From following HBase seeing its releases depending > directly on Hadoop release gets me thinking... > > Best regards, > > Imran > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Tom White wrote: > > Eclipse does big bang releases of multiple components, but I believe > > it requires a huge amount of coordination and planning. Instead, I > > think the direction Hadoop should move in is to stabilize and clearly > > demarcate its core filesystem and MapReduce interfaces, so that > > projects like HBase, Pig, and Hive can run against multiple versions > > of core. Their release cycles are already largely decoupled from core, > > so the question about whether they become TLPs is more to do with > > project governance than with release coordination. > > > > Cheers, > > Tom > > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > >> Not sure exactly what I meant by "1.0 of what", "Hadoop" I guess, I was > >> trying to address the concerns raised, which I share -- Alan's concern > is > >> that if the projects are completely separate from each other, that might > >> decrease visibility as to the demands they're placing on each other when > >> integrated, and St.Ack mentioned the frankenstein factor which I think > we've > >> all felt some pain from, and which may get worse after the project > split. > >> What's the standard way to deploy the three, even? Is there one? > >> > >> If the PMCs jointly maintained some sort of 'stable integrated build' > which > >> took in new releases from the TLPs as they were released after a soak > >> period, it could provide a common touchstone that bugs could be tested > >> against and cross-component patches delivered against, potentially > >> increasing visibility of cross-component issues while providing a less > >> cobbled-together system to administrate. On the other side, though, if > >> executed wrong, you'd be creating a committee of committees and possibly > >> undoing some of the benefits of going TLP in the first place, especially > if > >> politics heat up over what goes into the 'standard' build. I think it > could > >> be viable though. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > >>> > >>> What if the projects were: > >>>> > >>>> A) split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that level > of > >>>> individual community > >>>> > >>>> but, > >>>> > >>>> B) The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated build > >>>> containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want out > of > >>>> it? > >>>> > >>>> That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a > 1.0 > >>>> release, > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 1.0 release of what? > >>> > >>> Arun > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > Imran M Yousuf > Entrepreneur & Software Engineer > Smart IT Engineering > Dhaka, Bangladesh > Email: imran@smartitengineering.com > Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/ > Mobile: +880-1711402557 > --001636d3496ad942aa0483c7a442-- From general-return-1331-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 13:34:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49444 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 13:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 13:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 93995 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93910 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93902 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 13:34:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [96.6.114.79] (HELO prod-mail-xrelay04.akamai.com) (96.6.114.79) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:34:48 +0000 Received: from prod-mail-xrelay04.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C086B95353 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prod-mail-relay03.akamai.com (unknown [172.27.8.26]) by prod-mail-xrelay04.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8CD95352 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from USMA1VM-FEGATE3.kendall.corp.akamai.com (exchange.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.17.120.149]) by prod-mail-relay03.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D712FD62 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from MAVS2.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.17.33.20]) by USMA1VM-FEGATE3.kendall.corp.akamai.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:34:26 -0400 Received: from 172.19.113.103 ([172.19.113.103]) by MAVS2.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.17.33.102]) via Exchange Front-End Server exchange.akamai.com ([172.17.120.149]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:34:25 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:34:24 -0400 Subject: Different exception handling on corrupt GZip file reading From: Richard Weber To: Hadoop Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Different exception handling on corrupt GZip file reading Thread-Index: AcrX6V4gX9KGeNhIC0uktMcdChQ3Xw== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3353650464_38430317" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2010 13:34:26.0053 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F597350:01CAD7E9] --B_3353650464_38430317 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Maybe this is a =B3dumb=B2 question. In our situation, we process a ton of log files all gzipped. Some of those files may be truncated for a a variety of reasons resulting in a corrupted gzip file. Now using the default TextInputFormat and LineRecordReader, Hadoop will happily churn along until it hits a corrupted file. Once it hits the file, it throws exceptions, tries to restart on that file and ultimately fails. = I originally tried using the Skipped Records feature, but these exceptions ar= e happening at the IO level, not record level. My solution has been to just make a new SafeTextInputFormat and SafeLineRecordReader class. The only difference between these classes and the non-safe classes is that it has a try {} block in the nextKeyValue() fn= =B9 when it does the readLine. If an exception occurs, then the file is closed out. My question really boils down to: Is there a reason this isn=B9t in the Hadoo= p libary to start with? Even if there was a flag to raise the exception, or just let it keep flowing with bad input data. It=B9s really more of a gripe that I need to reimplement the above 2 classes just to have a try catch block, and then to make sure I use these classes for my input format. Thanks --Rick --B_3353650464_38430317-- From general-return-1332-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 10 14:34:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27411 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2010 14:34:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Apr 2010 14:34:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 96960 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2010 14:34:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96898 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2010 14:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96890 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2010 14:33:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:33:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.184] (HELO mail-yx0-f184.google.com) (209.85.210.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:33:51 +0000 Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so2001997yxe.5 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:33:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6pmkQ3LAklZbDZ3C0h8leSY54LhiqSRId0+8skCe0uI=; b=l3bbWS2hpkZeOwOA5h8HdaNyYlY/Ni9wy/OahKH8wYV4U61YdlGG0GdiHftvPwF10G Lf+pBede+SMoQ6H3VFklZJrvbXJxKyTWqcZTviUH+RqNNq9s7vIIHDtJH6QAPVJbrv3R hmi37o9SLuYtapROsl/xYgqeqslzd/0XfzhJ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XYGIs5gH4jkRMaxUMkrC9EKCp/CdRUjNrcObcvKFgAVSiNjQm46r+I0O6gTQ0/pW+o PL+eiTpx8MLeUnMwO3O3NXeRxqPo/4Bdl67OAevAaoeeEX2B5WdJbak9H6w+3GzcFhZa +bwlJEl6h6gr9Nt4dN5WcPLH0wXoiw9QVOt/8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.130 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:33:30 -0400 Received: by 10.101.21.13 with SMTP id y13mr2631173ani.210.1270910010816; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: rack awareness question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Lets say I had a mapping like this, 192.168.0.2 -> /rackdefault I would now like to map 192.168.0.2 -> /rack02 What is the procedure to do this? is this possible to do while the cluster is running? TIA From general-return-1333-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 00:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74568 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 00:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 00:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 45148 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 00:31:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45091 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 00:31:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45083 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 00:31:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:31:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:30:54 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=HX/wDFkN5+nYiBevr1kVj4caJC7dcDVuSiBl9xmmZtkhdhLvKFJNczZe KE418Vjr0s1UOwPmG3VEW1rNVnjjQeWtQ8SO2FKnEgqBMAJnhb1L/ZUbC esewzyz9oslQCra; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1271032254; x=1302568254; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20question|Date:=20Mon ,=2012=20Apr=202010=2000:30:36=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<9de96d17-5a70-49e2-9122-1a9b4cc8 ad30>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=XrJnLCxaUKhNekSyver+SrHLe3v2nBiXpsCeXUvNGX0=; b=OCYgOFmZdo2AdeOBjdwM7+r161edOx5lElsW+JwYR+pmraNVaP3Jo5wV Sy8SaG9VIFghnrxjwhmbgCa1LrH056ZSdZE+9OabR5VMOdZxB1WORqo35 41rE/GdKoVbo+Vw; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,186,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12255059" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:30:33 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:30:32 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:30:32 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: rack awareness question Thread-Topic: rack awareness question Thread-Index: AQHK2Lrd83fFTEyGQkeCRFATVCpFBpIecp8A Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:30:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9de96d17-5a70-49e2-9122-1a9b4cc8ad30> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2010 00:30:33.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[5CE94D30:01CAD9D7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 10, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > What is the procedure to do this? Change the topology script, bounce NN and JT. > is this possible to do while the > cluster is running? No. There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual cache w/TT= Ls, etc.= From general-return-1334-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 01:34:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82777 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 01:34:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 01:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 79287 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 01:34:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79208 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 01:34:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79197 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 01:34:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:34:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:34:43 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so2229473qwh.35 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:34:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.250.138 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:28:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:28:34 -0700 Received: by 10.229.241.82 with SMTP id ld18mr41092qcb.60.1271035714274; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness question From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630eda93f087304840010ec --00163630eda93f087304840010ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > No. There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual cache > w/TTLs, etc. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-870, for those who like hyperlinks. --00163630eda93f087304840010ec-- From general-return-1335-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 06:05:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30699 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 06:05:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 06:05:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 06:05:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2342 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 06:05:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2326 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 06:05:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:05:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.99.145.2] (HELO mx.inode.at) (62.99.145.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:05:45 +0000 Received: from [213.47.112.79] (port=3766 helo=localhost) by smartmx-02.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1Clv-0000cZ-Ag; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:05:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:05:22 +0200 From: Robert Barta To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness question Message-ID: <20100412060522.GA32132@odman.int.devc.at> Reply-To: rho@devc.at References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Robert Barta User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:28:34PM -0700, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > > No. There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual cache > > w/TTLs, etc. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-870, for those who like > hyperlinks. Links are always appreciated as I feed here my semantic network about MapReduce/Hadoop/... with them: http://tmip.devc.at/test/mapreduce/.surface/x3/seadragon.html So if you have the feeling that your favourite tool is underrepresented there, feel free to provide me with more material. \rho From general-return-1336-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 11:38:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96810 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 11:38:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 11:38:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 90036 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 11:38:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89510 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89502 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 11:37:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:37:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.198] (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.223.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:37:54 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4494855iwn.29 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WV7HpgJbsXbnrwCEUry16j7TVxgsnhY7em8JackvvjI=; b=pgBEfc46FCVRFnZsR1mLzvUJ8LIKZpAgGLPJjR/zigW+XbIVp42iHkJwKk/O8r4siP y6ka5c99dW/14gWgKJwP6q0VLQo9uIxQDQbTDrk3WsE5sHuYoj5Yv1mLTWtzocJjbOt4 HBNNAyJGVupg/sudgBzrMrI4/ny8JJZxBJzMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UiGKKs1eeSxUMFMT0h31ApiBa/zWlv5rmLUjLoN1arH+Y8tqFRsxlT2dwrrBkMq8xD fg4ajU81Ku4waqk+7QLyt6QKiOqoLj1aWsomb8oheA0Yp6ZuA8XXir3CWdyL6VDPrHMc QS3TaQX2V3cj7uw09uyXM6vg6e2X5MIuYhKCA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.130 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:37:33 -0400 Received: by 10.231.170.14 with SMTP id b14mr1848781ibz.54.1271072253602; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. What is 'JT'? JobTracker? On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Mag Gam wrote: >> What is the procedure to do this? > > Change the topology script, bounce NN and JT. > > >> is this possible to do while the >> cluster is running? > > No. =C2=A0There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual cac= he w/TTLs, etc. From general-return-1337-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 15:42:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77539 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 15:42:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 15:42:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 27476 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 15:42:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27369 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 15:42:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27361 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 15:42:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:42:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:42:30 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so2464092qwh.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VFHtcjBWczpUNS5Kw1RJdPpNeQih0+lxGnn6QpQhsaM=; b=dlV+fRa5gvR3B9krZt3IBZr2lN/uzvu36ovSiJFS5v6i+si1mvKBDi25/VgnSLt7rF YmB7maF0eF6FKs9dr0KCFTR4Xk1+o0OooVqkMobf9NDaAeVPWV8zHpTE7dI2w2L05cRI QPHjZcMd2UFo9h9ZIE+/ihBNoznglDECDIvsI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fVfHfJbauhjfrBszT8OuD8W1/06kEpL7Ni1jFRywcD4ypNP1Eo1WD9IWESweM8YM3o wrqbJcjs87gcAackYmPOspOZhXdnUJTwE2vMNl5gfyeVH8s+Qarb9hRJQSH8Vdw1sDH2 1VZzfNGXR/CWfOrjx0FdPQc2uIqVtIp7UvYZQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.10.133 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:42:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F1902B5-BAD3-440D-8D35-6EBC3297B939@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:42:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 55620509235ee58b Received: by 10.229.193.18 with SMTP id ds18mr6082257qcb.14.1271086929976; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HBase as TLP From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Its been a while since there's been a peep out of this thread so I'll now move this topic to a vote. Thanks to all who contributed to the discussion. St.Ack On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > Alright, I totally agree. =A0Thanks for putting it that way. > > -Jay > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Imran M Yousuf wrot= e: > >> +1 >> >> I feel the same. From following HBase seeing its releases depending >> directly on Hadoop release gets me thinking... >> >> Best regards, >> >> Imran >> >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Tom White wrote: >> > Eclipse does big bang releases of multiple components, but I believe >> > it requires a huge amount of coordination and planning. Instead, I >> > think the direction Hadoop should move in is to stabilize and clearly >> > demarcate its core filesystem and MapReduce interfaces, so that >> > projects like HBase, Pig, and Hive can run against multiple versions >> > of core. Their release cycles are already largely decoupled from core, >> > so the question about whether they become TLPs is more to do with >> > project governance than with release coordination. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Tom >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jay Booth wrote: >> >> Not sure exactly what I meant by "1.0 of what", "Hadoop" I guess, I w= as >> >> trying to address the concerns raised, which I share -- Alan's concer= n >> is >> >> that if the projects are completely separate from each other, that mi= ght >> >> decrease visibility as to the demands they're placing on each other w= hen >> >> integrated, and St.Ack mentioned the frankenstein factor which I thin= k >> we've >> >> all felt some pain from, and which may get worse after the project >> split. >> >> What's the standard way to deploy the three, even? =A0Is there one? >> >> >> >> If the PMCs jointly maintained some sort of 'stable integrated build' >> which >> >> took in new releases from the TLPs as they were released after a soak >> >> period, it could provide a common touchstone that bugs could be teste= d >> >> against and cross-component patches delivered against, potentially >> >> increasing visibility of cross-component issues while providing a les= s >> >> cobbled-together system to administrate. =A0On the other side, though= , if >> >> executed wrong, you'd be creating a committee of committees and possi= bly >> >> undoing some of the benefits of going TLP in the first place, especia= lly >> if >> >> politics heat up over what goes into the 'standard' build. =A0I think= it >> could >> >> be viable though. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Arun C Murthy >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Jay Booth wrote: >> >>> >> >>> =A0What if the projects were: >> >>>> >> >>>> A) =A0split out to TLPs because they do seem to have reached that l= evel >> of >> >>>> individual community >> >>>> >> >>>> but, >> >>>> >> >>>> B) =A0The projects could somehow jointly put out an integrated buil= d >> >>>> containing the above projects and let users run whatever they want = out >> of >> >>>> it? >> >>>> >> >>>> That would require a lot of coordination but would make a heck of a >> 1.0 >> >>>> release, >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 1.0 release of what? >> >>> >> >>> Arun >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Imran M Yousuf >> Entrepreneur & Software Engineer >> Smart IT Engineering >> Dhaka, Bangladesh >> Email: imran@smartitengineering.com >> Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/ >> Mobile: +880-1711402557 >> > From general-return-1338-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 15:57:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87151 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 15:57:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 15:57:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 59971 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 15:57:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59855 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 15:57:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59842 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 15:57:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:57:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:57:12 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so2470569qwh.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=++z8ceir4yeWezuJoC4DQP/oAQJ9UmvCMpZGThdlWkY=; b=GXgeeXTsuaAywCm+x0gSZiPunjYTeSv3oyBGTCOHXiS47hLPJtrnVMPTx5a3kS1+rS /agX07V8wQiJljilCwK/0aCEMS26YJUDGxsoacVrOleMbAWLp29PYiUEEqkjhJQv9edX 4ZNHST322pz8rqwLqcbmwhlE3oWi/wnmeRo5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=o6EqmId63/pQmVpkX0m5xOdfvea38jDEecmgBcZY49DYRYK65yM1sSl0kf6s+p2Hml Kqk0N4bnLwSF1XtKf9ujUB3wazBolmg+gRGkytoekCFQOoy8XYVpkP2l/Irc5eUfM6zO g4vO/ORdY7QE67n9Lgpj0vKxQmw3LYcezeOOk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.10.133 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ca2f50e17d7c1ac2 Received: by 10.229.218.204 with SMTP id hr12mr188968qcb.101.1271087811372; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level Apache project. I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current active HBase committers as initial members of the project management committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? Yours, St.Ack ------------ X. Establish the Apache HBase Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to data serialization for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to a distributed database; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache HBase Project: * Michael Stack * Jonathan Gray * Andrew Purtell * John-Daniel Cryans * Ryan Rawson * Lars George NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache HBase Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1339-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 16:19:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99664 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 16:19:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 16:19:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 83265 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:19:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83203 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83195 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 16:19:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:19:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:19:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 99270 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 16:18:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.102]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:18:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4BC347E4.9050706@apache.org> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:18:44 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Avro as TLP? References: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BBB9675.1090909@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This passes, with 11 +1 votes and no -1 votes. Owen, can you please add this resolution to the agenda for next week's board meeting? Thanks, Doug Doug Cutting wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Avro should become a top-level > Apache project, as mentioned previously on this list. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > committers as the initial members of the project management committee > (PMC) and Matt Massie as the initial chair. > > Does the Hadoop PMC support sending this proposal on to the board? > > Thanks, > > Doug > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache Avro Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Avro Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to data serialization; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Avro" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Avro Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Avro Project: > > * Doug Cutting > * Jeff Hammerbacher > * Jeff Hodges > * Matt Massie > * Philip Zeyliger > * Scott Banachowski > * Scott Carey > * Sharad Agarwal > * Thiruvalluvan M. G. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Massie > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Avro, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Avro PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Avro Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Avro Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Avro sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1340-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 16:52:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18847 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 16:52:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 16:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 35341 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:52:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35153 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:52:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35140 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 16:52:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:52:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:52:32 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1718256wwb.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:52:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.5 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:52:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:52:10 -0700 Received: by 10.216.88.79 with SMTP id z57mr2544321wee.22.1271091130142; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoo= p PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > =A0 X. Establish the Apache HBase Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to data serialization > =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed database; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibilit= y > =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jonathan Gray > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Andrew Purtell > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* John-Daniel Cryans > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ryan Rawson > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lars George > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1341-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:21:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55653 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:21:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:21:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90789 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:21:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90623 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:21:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90615 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:21:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:21:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:21:39 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=RMqQRswGBxUXeUl0ySKI8xGAJveLw93zVleCFpY1HaSpSgzPlipRb47j sgpSeYAtTXg35sJJaJVElJPcTCv6kkF/61JHP/isG+z6lUUzUpO/nOa2/ F/H0J09iOOElyhE; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1271096499; x=1302632499; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20question|Date:=20Mon ,=2012=20Apr=202010=2018:21:16=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<732 D302F-02DD-4D45-8023-6484445CB5E9@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A =20=0D =0A=20; bh=QqT6sNPV6diVYX1MXQLgup5DghAVXvi/vc28/TcXTLU=; b=v1NAVx96IW21ze96H5dG/l/3uFfO9eeGiq2PNFL2vB0sBoRoo6BnwPjE WuKOv7+p+qeFLpyN+whVZTY1NrvHxDXcqQ7Vszm22EDTWnulGkQTJ69hL RYKnnbTKFlbG09m; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,192,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="11913400" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:21:19 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:21:18 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:21:18 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: rack awareness question Thread-Topic: rack awareness question Thread-Index: AQHK2Lrd83fFTEyGQkeCRFATVCpFBpIecp8AgAAQMwCAARryAA== Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:21:16 +0000 Message-ID: <732D302F-02DD-4D45-8023-6484445CB5E9@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2010 18:21:19.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[F26E2BB0:01CADA6C] On Apr 11, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> No. There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual cache >> w/TTLs, etc. >=20 >=20 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-870, for those who like > hyperlinks. Thank you for supporting my laziness. ;) From general-return-1342-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 19:06:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73851 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 19:06:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 19:06:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 66871 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:06:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66776 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66768 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 19:06:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:06:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.6.228.93] (HELO n13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (74.6.228.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:05:58 +0000 Received: from [76.13.12.67] by n13.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2010 19:05:36 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.181] by t8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2010 19:05:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp122.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2010 19:05:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 683659.87141.bm@omp122.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 92543 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Apr 2010 19:05:36 -0000 Message-ID: <432237.92455.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9dlNexcVM1kJyjB2selUsiVKYdjmHtlj.JZMmPC36ZLdHNj TsOUGQiNDlcDAOs4O6xsGWt6MelZyF0ISHoaikRByXytn_e9FvikcxDW75c. JYAmg.Sm2kFEQ4R1GQO7GJpD9GbCryB7OhKE7pEF46yh7IQFclNQIAVehsn3 nUa.Iw_d5tUguJRJACNw7w2kh_CXF6J581D9wG2HVyTQeICIsH0n3q8cYbb1 YBJlqgti0KP2UP48IljVIJw2GyGBsiEDYNVHibZ4ISgyc.o9Krcq_8G71xzo eHCP4hSIWoQvP7zKXkk0Vlr2tYV3NvlPir753orJMNe5jZD0Bkk6z_IntPA- - Received: from [69.108.153.136] by web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:05:36 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 - Andy > From: Stack > Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? > > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. From general-return-1343-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 19:12:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75524 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 19:12:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 19:12:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 76794 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:12:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76735 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:12:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76727 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 19:12:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:12:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:12:11 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1808282ewy.31 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:11:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a/VEFip1wNAr1A+TS9Q6k5u6BbB1D4rQUpGuAfEET2E=; b=h6AEaS22TBlRNl6PUJtrxeRzOGcf58Hc0i9pDkita8hoqjph9KfojdyB5W1Upm/yzp 3bSXxcNn9DOoUrSz0iijVQGx4wv5dpaxUqBrV0xmPu0INiff0eY6H3M717ZLi7DdouNQ Z8seS23C0gIfeBHDFgvFFOAk2TjLJuX3+wtII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sfkNpYXod8koOaz4BYsnDnHtvghfTf2AHL8R6VUYb6s5kWOc/UlXkDIAh+Q44BGxI1 Knct6u2G4AJ6uIJ9wKrv6W5xyBFtqUaNCsCtfKDVyZgfdhoRA2SSq56tRk0uFpvsgkzx /by5lZjKsaWMtlVvLdNpcX/HELCGpbMFyyj+M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.169.2 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:11:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <432237.92455.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <432237.92455.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:11:51 +0200 Received: by 10.102.12.13 with SMTP id 13mr2332090mul.133.1271099511096; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org, apurtell@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 - Tim On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote= : > +1 > > =A0- Andy > >> From: Stack >> Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? >> >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. > > > > > > From general-return-1344-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:10:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63197 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:10:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:10:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 8680 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:10:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8634 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8619 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:10:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:10:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:10:17 +0000 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so2985283gwa.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sneGWTyh9SwzaKVdKhvw8kZKXlysWGxNwa8VsdDfQHU=; b=WH5YmjGMSGQUP3OIAJSl1rfj1sApscyjTkKy+ZVM0aqiFcj0xLYx4QOuBFH5csaCOC 8h2eQ/kFmdAKpzkMHx90+efYtp7qd4+gXh+vz0er5NQEJ5SDHVWwSdVrVdVO+4TSFrt1 zIqGJIUvX7MPrgRrVR4/QaexjxYllTYxQlD+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TkJfL5R7ARvKXyhTNoEabjiRVaYbrf6dh8mgHA+E5PIva+YSVImySPGNMHFK07cV2l DIvi2xxnxFOs1s5Fi/VjHXudAt/R5dKEzd1Cc/Pv1xAWJ4a9s565qcHQU8s6jrZwEkkv ILEgCA2yUD4P/4NShmDOc3AVSbJEfjs9KYluQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.100.5 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <432237.92455.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <432237.92455.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:09:56 +0200 Received: by 10.151.60.7 with SMTP id n7mr4101546ybk.183.1271110196755; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Lars George To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 --- Lars On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote= : > +1 > > =A0- Andy > >> From: Stack >> Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? >> >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. > > > > > > From general-return-1345-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:21:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70769 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:21:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20150 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20044 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20021 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:21:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:21:06 +0000 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so2991549gwa.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jvjcwPhSi11Z8BMKiuRmz+LXEcQeikwE+zvPEBdtEDA=; b=RfZwGgedlsciOPEftV7GnLGBeTm0VLgdMsD4WSe19OZ4MPbktv6yLyqMT+r9bO59bG 8q3M0Tt70oRCrVHX37W+jdpo7qlnncRInPgrHFXzXz5n6S4Qnkp2cl8BghsVIkGKRL7O sAPRX+e2Ac4az+nAigIO3vqpJvclddO/mkLls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rKANZL/OA08gJAMTEz8WMx/S6IuWQCaoNBwMm6J122qheIFb9vQX9YHLimhXRFpIVu dJhPE18abrikSMn8dH+z135nX/CbL+LtcQY5ZWw0ci2aXvBk3phBsKXmuNwd5Q8nb9mj XCRIHEfU1aMsJSpMuSeqR2vT+BvnxZVWVLIRw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.89.20 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:20:45 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 71122ad0dbbf5a5e Received: by 10.91.192.14 with SMTP id u14mr269695agp.98.1271110845611; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoo= p PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > =A0 X. Establish the Apache HBase Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to data serialization > =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed database; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibilit= y > =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jonathan Gray > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Andrew Purtell > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* John-Daniel Cryans > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ryan Rawson > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lars George > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1346-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:39:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83038 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:38:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 45300 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:38:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45162 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:38:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45146 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:38:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:38:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:38:52 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3CMc6nN091124; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=2qlDVOvg3ZaY5dP41BYfUhwB7niL6KiLmq+XvMV4dnUZs7kgVc1BBtt38hOKvq0l Received: from SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.89]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:38:07 -0700 Received: from 172.21.148.59 ([172.21.148.59]) by SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.103]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:37:48 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:37:45 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Amir Youssefi To: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Thread-Index: AcrakMUTC/bAdlt7okeMZyhtFSzGVw== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2010 22:38:07.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[D23142F0:01CADA90] +1 -ay On 4/12/10 8:56 AM, "Stack" wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop > PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache HBase Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to a distributed database; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache HBase Project: > > * Michael Stack > * Jonathan Gray > * Andrew Purtell > * John-Daniel Cryans > * Ryan Rawson > * Lars George > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1347-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:42:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84720 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 50583 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:42:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50520 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:42:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50506 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:42:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:42:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:42:20 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3CMfcZ2084463; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:41:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=k902QHVpZBVRwpKa6dWFZ3bFeD+uzRhQai9k6vUxiR9kwfapx9JfkjZwkvrqNTLy Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:41:38 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:41:06 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:41:06 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Mahadev Konar To: CC: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Thread-Index: AcrakTzhSkukb7lFYUeglHISHYP5ow== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2010 22:41:38.0822 (UTC) FILETIME=[5071AA60:01CADA91] +1=20 Thanks mahadev On 4/12/10 3:20 PM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote: > +1 >=20 > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Stack wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. >>=20 >> I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current >> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >>=20 >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hado= op >> PMC? >>=20 >> Yours, >> St.Ack >>=20 >> ------------ >>=20 >> =A0 X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to data serialization >> =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution at no charge to the public. >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", >> =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is >> =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed database; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be >> =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility >> =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of >> =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project: >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jonathan Gray >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Andrew Purtell >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* John-Daniel Cryans >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ryan Rawson >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lars George >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack >> =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to >> =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is >> =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby >> =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the >> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >>=20 From general-return-1348-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:43:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85511 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:43:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:43:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 52858 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52784 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52768 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:43:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:43:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.217] (HELO mail-bw0-f217.google.com) (209.85.218.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:43:22 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so5167283bwz.29 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.70.77 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:02 -0700 Received: by 10.204.34.201 with SMTP id m9mr5515907bkd.127.1271112182129; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Tom White To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoo= p PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > =A0 X. Establish the Apache HBase Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to data serialization > =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed database; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibilit= y > =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jonathan Gray > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Andrew Purtell > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* John-Daniel Cryans > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ryan Rawson > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lars George > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1349-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:49:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88161 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:49:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 58507 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:49:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58476 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:49:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58464 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:49:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:49:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:49:21 +0000 Received: from [10.72.76.34] ([10.72.76.34]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3CMlUrZ037018; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BC3A304.9050701@apache.org> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:47:32 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 Patrick On 04/12/2010 03:43 PM, Tom White wrote: > +1 > > Tom > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. >> >> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current >> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? >> >> Yours, >> St.Ack >> >> ------------ >> >> X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to data serialization >> for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a distributed database; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache HBase Project: >> >> * Michael Stack >> * Jonathan Gray >> * Andrew Purtell >> * John-Daniel Cryans >> * Ryan Rawson >> * Lars George >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> From general-return-1350-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 23:20:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4866 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 23:20:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 23:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 88414 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:20:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88375 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88367 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 23:20:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:20:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:20:25 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-246-192.corp.yahoo.com ([172.21.148.192]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3CNIU5d002415 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:19:06 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > Hadoop PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > X. Establish the Apache HBase Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to a distributed database; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache HBase Project: > > * Michael Stack > * Jonathan Gray > * Andrew Purtell > * John-Daniel Cryans > * Ryan Rawson > * Lars George > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1351-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 23:57:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32693 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 23:57:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 23:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 15739 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:57:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15705 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:57:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15697 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 23:57:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:57:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jessesanford@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:57:42 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so5144433pzk.2 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MSWJXMfafFJXdNkujq23g/qeAUNz7gdbKwLYb+WkyXk=; b=aXIn1scqjNN8cBwgxAfNIgmRA6tPgzQszHmqh3/t5QpTQDNkHVIzeBw+ZDn+X+SRjR tAR6Ty3ZN6Lri9V99vbfpi2nzmqkeJDHJ2istjR9P+tH//CD1H9/PsEeXUDIaz0v3v+4 hb3AsmfFcxV2GdnqmV4zdBEXXa5fZCinWt9AY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jGMYEzXvPkSlSJwOaJtaVdelVzSSFEdrT/q4QpI5KG0qpxpcETvHBFSey2kW3hp5/T XPde1FdgBq8bbhi5/A9qDmVZc3XNB27w7+Jvs1LxPmG8ywdeMpBs0J7qq57fP//3jHed aGjCHAtFXluwfgGLdzp9eQKgMvD8ECVkFQ69k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.19.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.19.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:57:20 -0400 Received: by 10.142.119.3 with SMTP id r3mr2058999wfc.145.1271116641009; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Jesse Sanford To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b6b9db01ad048412e7e4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0b6b9db01ad048412e7e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Apr 12, 2010 7:20 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: +1 Arun On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should beco... --001636e0b6b9db01ad048412e7e4-- From general-return-1352-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:52:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70281 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:52:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:52:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 48571 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:52:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48485 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48469 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:52:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:52:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of john@beforedawnsolutions.com does not designate 209.85.221.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.187] (HELO mail-qy0-f187.google.com) (209.85.221.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:52:32 +0000 Received: by qyk17 with SMTP id 17so2270644qyk.9 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.217.196 with SMTP id hn4mr953899qcb.94.1271119930849; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (c-71-196-131-13.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.196.131.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w30sm6801872qce.22.2010.04.12.17.52.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: John Martyniak In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:52:06 -0400 Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Can somebody tell me why this is a good idea? Isn't HBase tightly coupled with Hadoop/HDFS. Isn't that the benefit of = it. -John On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. >=20 > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >=20 > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the = Hadoop PMC? >=20 > Yours, > St.Ack >=20 > ------------ >=20 > X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >=20 > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to a distributed database; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache HBase Project: >=20 > * Michael Stack > * Jonathan Gray > * Andrew Purtell > * John-Daniel Cryans > * Ryan Rawson > * Lars George >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache HBase Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1353-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:53:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70536 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:53:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:53:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 50495 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:53:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50449 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:53:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50441 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:53:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:53:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of boyuzhang35@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:52:55 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1973202wwb.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=T0Dae1CGJwiUwj6diKdjwBRU4jUONagDo7hjGCwKF7k=; b=YBDCi+tqeoBwEs9cqYoqi4+Sw4JqZuwFX+ph3XuS6yzj4eM8DXASXmdy9G3nMTjZQv spdZX1VCyBLTQlhef/sVDRTEIvJwyLWGIuY1/+6+HcBstHE3JeXWagCPJIWC4fsazzL6 iG7Ql5M0WmGibN4XS4lindq8GmEZN5nRO+Tcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XY0zD79DSy+9Cz5fq5cJ8eoVA6kZfStnqE/xAnG1oCMC+DCRjxU6iG2P7PtZWvInHR aePVSe9dCpGSXMJttbJbfokfZp3z2NzG3pBWBgVSuLkiH60FfZfhXTJrgpyX87eJaLKv WJiJPMwwjvgFLztjiTnR+FbkRLlZnRUbNZwMg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.29.195 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:52:34 -0400 Received: by 10.216.169.84 with SMTP id m62mr2578361wel.130.1271119954660; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop on demand setup: Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address From: Boyu Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b60a05d4f59048413add2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b60a05d4f59048413add2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Kevin, Sorry to bother again, I am wondering in order to get HOD to work, do we need to install all the prerequisite software like passwordless ssh? Thanks a lot! Boyu On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Van Workum wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to setup hadoop on demand (HOD) on my cluster. I'm > currently unable to "allocate cluster". I'm starting hod with the > following command: > > /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/bin/hod -c > /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/conf/hodrc -t > /b/01/vanw/hod/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -o "allocate ~/hod 3" > --ringmaster.log-dir=/tmp -b 4 > > The job starts on the nodes and I see the ringmaster running on the > MotherSuperior. The ringmaster-main.log file is created, but is empty. > I don't see any associated processes running on the other 2 nodes in > the job. > > The critical errors are as follows: > > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,630] CRITICAL/50 hadoop:298 - Failed to retrieve > 'hdfs' service address. > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,631] DEBUG/10 hadoop:631 - Cleaning up cluster id > 238366.jman, as cluster could not be allocated. > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,632] DEBUG/10 hadoop:635 - Calling rm.stop() > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] DEBUG/10 hadoop:637 - Returning from rm.stop() > [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] CRITICAL/50 hod:401 - Cannot allocate > cluster /b/01/vanw/hod > [2010-04-06 10:34:14,149] DEBUG/10 hod:597 - return code: 7 > > The contents of the hodrc file is: > > [hod] > stream = True > java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 > cluster = orange > cluster-factor = 1.8 > xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > debug = 4 > allocate-wait-time = 3600 > temp-dir = /tmp/hod > > [ringmaster] > register = True > stream = False > temp-dir = /tmp/hod > http-port-range = 8000-9000 > work-dirs = /tmp/hod/1,/tmp/hod/2 > xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > debug = 4 > > [hodring] > stream = False > temp-dir = /tmp/hod > register = True > java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 > http-port-range = 8000-9000 > xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > debug = 4 > > [resource_manager] > queue = dque > batch-home = /usr/local/torque-2.3.7 > id = torque > env-vars = > HOD_PYTHON_HOME=/usr/local/python-2.5.5/bin/python > > [gridservice-mapred] > external = False > pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 > tracker_port = 8030 > info_port = 50080 > > [gridservice-hdfs] > external = False > pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 > fs_port = 8020 > info_port = 50070 > > > Some other useful information: > Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 > Python 2.5.5 > Twisted 10.0.0 > zope 3.3.0 > java version "1.6.0_02" > > -- > Kevin Van Workum, PhD > Sabalcore Computing Inc. > Run your code on 500 processors. > Sign up for a free trial account. > www.sabalcore.com > 877-492-8027 ext. 11 > --0016e65b60a05d4f59048413add2-- From general-return-1354-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 01:03:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76629 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 01:03:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 01:03:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 61216 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 01:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61170 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 01:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61156 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 01:03:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:03:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:03:06 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3D11Ate055011; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:01:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=UeLnJMC6/KvNGALvv8/yfJU+Wgdp1wPFDcUn2LZ5V2VWIENkSbD5gUeyrKAn/MvL Cc: Message-Id: From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:01:10 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For a discussion of this exact questions see: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201004.mbox/%3cx2l7c962aed1004072102j3ca29379he9f4095be7736f53@mail.gmail.com%3e Alan. On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:52 PM, John Martyniak wrote: > Can somebody tell me why this is a good idea? > > Isn't HBase tightly coupled with Hadoop/HDFS. Isn't that the > benefit of it. > > -John > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Stack wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. >> >> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current >> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >> >> Yours, >> St.Ack >> >> ------------ >> >> X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to data serialization >> for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a distributed database; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache HBase Project: >> >> * Michael Stack >> * Jonathan Gray >> * Andrew Purtell >> * John-Daniel Cryans >> * Ryan Rawson >> * Lars George >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1355-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 01:18:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85694 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 01:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 01:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 81128 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 01:18:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81075 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 01:18:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81059 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 01:18:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:18:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:18:29 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so757522vws.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.62.141 with SMTP id x13mr2612968vch.104.1271121487672; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.106] ([38.104.141.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm111843420vws.7.2010.04.12.18.18.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BC3C64E.8090805@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:18:06 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Tom White , hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 From general-return-1356-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 02:53:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11599 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 02:53:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 02:53:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 26943 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 02:53:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26862 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 02:53:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26854 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 02:53:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:53:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:52:55 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1572489gxk.11 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.196.13 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:52:21 -0400 Received: by 10.101.150.1 with SMTP id c1mr8871371ano.112.1271127141125; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop on demand setup: Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address From: Kevin Van Workum To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Boyu Zhang wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Sorry to bother again, I am wondering in order to get HOD to work, do we > need to install all the prerequisite software like passwordless ssh? Than= ks > a lot! SSH is not needed for HOD, it uses pbsdsh to launch processes on the nodes. HOD seems to be very sensitive about the python version: 2.4 and 2.6 don't work, you need 2.5. HOD is a little more flexible with Java, 1.5 and 1.6 seem to both work for me. Also, the most recent versions of Twisted and zope seem to be fine. > > Boyu > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Van Workum wro= te: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to setup hadoop on demand (HOD) on my cluster. I'm >> currently unable to "allocate cluster". I'm starting hod with the >> following command: >> >> /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/bin/hod -c >> /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/conf/hodrc -t >> /b/01/vanw/hod/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -o "allocate ~/hod 3" >> --ringmaster.log-dir=3D/tmp -b 4 >> >> The job starts on the nodes and I see the ringmaster running on the >> MotherSuperior. The ringmaster-main.log file is created, but is empty. >> I don't see any associated processes running on the other 2 nodes in >> the job. >> >> The critical errors are as follows: >> >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,630] CRITICAL/50 hadoop:298 - Failed to retrieve >> 'hdfs' service address. >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,631] DEBUG/10 hadoop:631 - Cleaning up cluster id >> 238366.jman, as cluster could not be allocated. >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,632] DEBUG/10 hadoop:635 - Calling rm.stop() >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] DEBUG/10 hadoop:637 - Returning from rm.stop() >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] CRITICAL/50 hod:401 - Cannot allocate >> cluster /b/01/vanw/hod >> [2010-04-06 10:34:14,149] DEBUG/10 hod:597 - return code: 7 >> >> The contents of the hodrc file is: >> >> [hod] >> stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True >> java-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /usr/local/jdk= 1.6.0_02 >> cluster =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D orange >> cluster-factor =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 1.8 >> xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 >> debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 >> allocate-wait-time =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 3600 >> temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod >> >> [ringmaster] >> register =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True >> stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False >> temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod >> http-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8000-9000 >> work-dirs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /tmp/hod/1,/tm= p/hod/2 >> xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 >> debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 >> >> [hodring] >> stream =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False >> temp-dir =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /tmp/hod >> register =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D True >> java-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D /usr/local/jdk= 1.6.0_02 >> http-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8000-9000 >> xrs-port-range =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 32768-65536 >> debug =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 4 >> >> [resource_manager] >> queue =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D dque >> batch-home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/local/tor= que-2.3.7 >> id =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D torque >> env-vars =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D >> HOD_PYTHON_HOME=3D/usr/local/python-2.5.5/bin/python >> >> [gridservice-mapred] >> external =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False >> pkgs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/loc= al/hadoop-0.20.2 >> tracker_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D 8030 >> info_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 50080 >> >> [gridservice-hdfs] >> external =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D False >> pkgs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=3D /usr/loc= al/hadoop-0.20.2 >> fs_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 8020 >> info_port =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D 50070 >> >> >> Some other useful information: >> Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 >> Python 2.5.5 >> Twisted 10.0.0 >> zope 3.3.0 >> java version "1.6.0_02" >> >> -- >> Kevin Van Workum, PhD >> Sabalcore Computing Inc. >> Run your code on 500 processors. >> Sign up for a free trial account. >> www.sabalcore.com >> 877-492-8027 ext. 11 >> > --=20 Kevin Van Workum, PhD Sabalcore Computing Inc. Run your code on 500 processors. Sign up for a free trial account. www.sabalcore.com 877-492-8027 ext. 11 From general-return-1357-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 04:56:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26637 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 04:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87400 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87355 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87347 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:56:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:56:07 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so3177377gyf.35 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:55:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+qfKPN0z0TTzz0LK0qNAjP8Hcv//brotrDRFMW060DQ=; b=I/PyRatR7NQlUNtTXRi8h9kKv2Qn8oJBR/qNtorywzKBFDSDh0ACAo2Dx4egJCZp9i FKZuxrUuD+iKFVHbTkhKRerLfW59twTVBuDzHTZ1CaN7BEorylPr7+cqq/LSGpC0+TXH c4GesrrmAyFFId501WDBzeRV+ymuUMeUePm38= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uDVACgOjBMK4qXPPiGy7mqreN893ZNYxkvx1/Yb6yGdgWSdKURhz+MQcSknykEW0Mc e8p6thTxMA1BLeXUkopcNkTLlFs13GVzMS/PacElxa4qF1ls3RePGbVsfdlYO55GmwaT HokO20vl1BmGclI7KC4NoeY+KpI0NJBmxIaco= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.130 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:55:46 -0400 Received: by 10.101.211.36 with SMTP id n36mr8987706anq.120.1271134546998; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: backing up namenode From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have 1 name node and I would like to back it up. What is the correct procedure to do this? Does the filesystem have to stay idle when the backup occurs? I have seen some searches about rsync, but I haven't seen any examples. Can someone please provide more information about this? TIA From general-return-1358-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 04:56:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26726 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 04:56:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 88394 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88356 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88346 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 04:56:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:56:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.197] (HELO mail-iw0-f197.google.com) (209.85.223.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:56:33 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so1669029iwn.21 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wRyt+Lm54ZNzSWDX9ijRUB6OZNYdfO/sswVUUFzBYWc=; b=MHv/tfU6Wqim6jQLaz4IWtUcfOGQ2cF+Z411DqaMWGKJ37gt/IgokQklwxcRr799LC 68PJ0ASx51vBAGGlj8MAVsZ9AY0qohBh0ddar6V1tLKnLik7uGvxg+3sBsmaPVGG90r+ 9mpGUDZ5l0VczHBa/yuxskbw/7+L5GSp1WfGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MY8HTA5omOeo1oeBa1YfQAHdOTW4v0UyIBNtO0B/sjawh/kFTWhdv32wIXEP7vWNQK lwCohMCPujlaWjGX57jMoq9okYqiCFg2m0LsPOInL7kkFVLWInk8Mq1u/8ZycME/YQFD UWGu5fNv5+sQ2K6X+sqOBkbOFHNvt2MT/qqa4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.130 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <732D302F-02DD-4D45-8023-6484445CB5E9@linkedin.com> References: <732D302F-02DD-4D45-8023-6484445CB5E9@linkedin.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:56:12 -0400 Received: by 10.231.152.75 with SMTP id f11mr2377723ibw.50.1271134572771; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks again. You have been very helpful... On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >>> No. =C2=A0There is a jira i filed on turning the cache into an actual c= ache >>> w/TTLs, etc. >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-870, for those who like >> hyperlinks. > > Thank you for supporting my laziness. ;) > > From general-return-1359-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 11:36:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 844 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 11:36:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 11:36:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 53940 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 11:36:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53753 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 11:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53724 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 11:36:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.115.85.73] (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:36:12 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623C44609E for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-exht01.vmware.com (pa-exht01.vmware.com [10.113.81.167]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C69ACD91E for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXCH-MBX-22.vmware.com ([10.113.81.177]) by pa-exht01.vmware.com ([10.113.81.167]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:52 -0700 From: Zhanlei Ma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:45 -0700 Subject: how to do if jobtracker failed Thread-Topic: how to do if jobtracker failed Thread-Index: Acra/XR8Gy1qOG/iSbSK6+CjrdRtuQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AFBx BHxj BLD2 BTE7 DyMC EP0n ERnT EcJH HGfr H8rW IH9u KA+M LQPS L7V1 L9hX MDgw;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{64934E66-41EA-4552-982E-8B437267A911};egBtAGEAQAB2AG0AdwBhAHIAZQAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:35:45 GMT;aABvAHcAIAB0AG8AIABkAG8AIABpAGYAIABqAG8AYgB0AHIAYQBjAGsAZQByACAAZgBhAGkAbABlAGQA x-cr-puzzleid: {64934E66-41EA-4552-982E-8B437267A911} acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EBFE351EXCHMBX22vmwa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EBFE351EXCHMBX22vmwa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all: When running job, how will hadoopp do if the jobtracker failed? Looking for= ward your answer! Thanks = Zhanlei Ma --_000_F21534570FE52940A8A9366D82C11E8B044EBFE351EXCHMBX22vmwa_-- From general-return-1360-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 11:41:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1509 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 11:41:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 11:41:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 60404 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 11:41:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60313 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 11:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60305 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 11:41:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:41:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.213] (HELO web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:41:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 19975 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Apr 2010 11:41:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1271158881; bh=V4J+Vyw7l5lquCFXZRal0jLgkDERnpMR59B1khRXfRI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tPL6JWx4ln+sd8KkXRDlXtH6iK/E4MEERKaMKHRaAkp/qBG2MBQo/wDYgHsZhyGL4RZdO2aMzdYI0sGDh35XDvxR6keqrjTeI/5btF4f+SoRwMuIio0TXBovTWT1F962gYkqNdgHqqCENRW92gbR8ehBD9mBDWBOr93/h4liyIE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uEXdKH4rhCAIUqXFi7r282uSsjDphbDc01RUy88tAhePiHCTAMrIDCSN5C95mf1uTFHt8tbbyhkujEcXKMe1a2Yi4OM5h4oqrVApd5TWg8fhUXg04yQj4Yiu1NJwjjxBZIEEtTSWlgX8D27eWVKdlDkpq7UchmQANflkWWhYFNE=; Message-ID: <601540.54306.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: WUcVm7kVM1l9Hcef1_NAK11x1XR386ZC3xWBFSKneR3kMF0 zdzaYHCaUa0pgP164q8oePC6mVYytHMzz4pVOZefinfLxWAc04voeoOw9tvt ag5YaQXuVDPwBeTWd.T3_LTvw6Z9w_k35dylFRs5dk7cWlbijkwE6C91cWos 8WXPzPC91Jxtj2X1AiDzm6x.7m2b_KTdKOdtmIQSwjQ.xEzKplTrRaM.IuD. f35HJA1blglqLW93yznQQVWDy3yvJyNR.h1Rm_aZaq_zxI0XCAxGDMix9nLc Vs9Bu1SMd52mRDVahESOhEkA1sk1TE4ZzE0NCMH5NZPMgRzuPBrYMh_F0U4G 5dR.eXGGzCkvUR8_dxth6xyoij8JoFw-- Received: from [98.207.82.20] by web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:41:16 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/348.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:41:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Nicholas Sze ----- Original Message ---- > From: Stack > To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 8:56:51 AM > Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? > > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level Apache > project. I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all > current active HBase committers as initial members of the project > management committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial > chair. Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to > the Hadoop PMC? Yours, St.Ack ------------ X. > Establish the Apache HBase Project WHEREAS, the > Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests > of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's > purpose to establish a Project Management Committee > charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source > software related to data serialization for distribution > at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT > RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to > be known as the "Apache HBase Project", be and hereby is > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be > it further RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project > be and hereby is responsible for the creation and > maintenance of software related to a distributed > database; and be it further RESOLVED, that the > office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be and hereby > is created, the person holding such office to serve at > the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of > the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it > further RESOLVED, that the persons listed > immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve > as the initial members of the Apache HBase > Project: * Michael Stack < > ymailto="mailto:stack@apache.org" > href="mailto:stack@apache.org">stack@apache.org> > * Jonathan Gray < > href="mailto:jgray@apache.org">jgray@apache.org> > * Andrew Purtell < > href="mailto:apurtell@apache.org">apurtell@apache.org> > * John-Daniel Cryans < > href="mailto:jdcryans@apache.org">jdcryans@apache.org> > * Ryan Rawson < > href="mailto:rawson@apache.org">rawson@apache.org> > * Lars George < > href="mailto:larsgeorge@apache.org">larsgeorge@apache.org> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael > Stack be appointed to the office of Vice President, > Apache HBase, to serve in accordance with and subject to > the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws > of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, > removal or disqualification, or until a successor is > appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the > initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is tasked with > the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage > open development and increased participation in the > Apache HBase Project; and be it further RESOLVED, > that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is tasked > with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1361-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 12:30:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22157 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 12:30:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 12:30:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 43540 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 12:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43468 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 12:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43453 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 12:30:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of imyousuf@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:30:24 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so954761vws.35 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:30:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mBbmazcd+OlETo3cnmV4U9snBIV/NDY5nwFZm6yFgWE=; b=ep/hV3YlAQv1YTS/Q+X7ElknsKELt0CEomNh3SY9lH41jNFpf1PP85SKegpO5U6woQ RmzXeR+XoRkq8RKqIn5IpLgQIxo7REdD9vNHpXSM5WCzAOrMwHCRt9zjHiw9IvpoLptF 97tVbY69mjJWLJ9D8Hapvw3dHn2LKp2WMPfMQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RautyUDrEHUm++razqkeoKirxDL+LRbxv0Yb75raPBd9dHJdvXDvNpwjwrPrrsg+xm z3JRXL9QLGgTaozoGST5WqLOnPdvNXLaEHV1+xpcGmn9U2C+jw7JqBbHI+Vc6yMkoAFK QQH0IFV1B/uEPt5LpS22BH1hjS/A45xjO4otA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.100.210 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:30:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <601540.54306.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <601540.54306.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:30:03 +0600 Received: by 10.220.107.13 with SMTP id z13mr2943628vco.190.1271161803247; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Imran M Yousuf To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 /Imran On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > +1 > Nicholas Sze > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Stack >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 8:56:51 AM >> Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? >> >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache >> project. > > I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all >> current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project >> management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial >> chair. > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to >> the Hadoop PMC? > > Yours, > St.Ack > > ------------ > > =A0 X. >> Establish the Apache HBase Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the >> Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0interests >> of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's >> purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee >> charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0open-source >> software related to data serialization > =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution >> at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT >> RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to >> be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is >> established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be >> it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project >> be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and >> maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed >> database; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the >> office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby >> is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve at >> the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > =A0 =A0 =A0of >> the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > >> =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > >> =A0 responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it >> further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed >> immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve >> as the initial members of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase >> Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack < >> ymailto=3D"mailto:stack@apache.org" >> href=3D"mailto:stack@apache.org">stack@apache.org> > >> =A0 * Jonathan Gray < >> href=3D"mailto:jgray@apache.org">jgray@apache.org> > >> =A0 * Andrew Purtell < >> href=3D"mailto:apurtell@apache.org">apurtell@apache.org> > >> =A0 =A0 * John-Daniel Cryans < >> href=3D"mailto:jdcryans@apache.org">jdcryans@apache.org> > >> =A0 =A0 * Ryan Rawson < >> href=3D"mailto:rawson@apache.org">rawson@apache.org> > >> =A0 =A0 * Lars George < >> href=3D"mailto:larsgeorge@apache.org">larsgeorge@apache.org> > > >> =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael >> Stack > =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, >> Apache HBase, to > =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to >> the direction of the > =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws >> of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, >> removal or disqualification, > =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is >> appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the >> initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with >> the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0encourage >> open development and increased participation in the > >> Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, >> that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked >> with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > >> Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > >> =A0 Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > --=20 Imran M Yousuf Entrepreneur & Software Engineer Smart IT Engineering Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: imran@smartitengineering.com Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/ Mobile: +880-1711402557 From general-return-1362-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 14:43:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56514 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 14:43:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 14:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 60929 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 14:43:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60850 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 14:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60842 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 14:43:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:43:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of boyuzhang35@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:43:37 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1699840wyb.35 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ATlIWX5YNu0M+dzDBo/iI80+pKrmVxernuGENco93Dw=; b=CGTx/ptupftHPOk3n+G0AA6Sq0jclNM2CHVsdmHBMYlu5B70RpmLmjy1ByX9/4bdxG P89flVGiyo1giubvfP22nwWUaxaO3IVw26XUTiqr+F4oplB9l5DvSk1jGaH2b201tMvp AJbL7gxdW+8v53bnsT9KCx578cmgrrykVAIj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LKZ2NxOSoZQeCIFCV4Dn42GdIbnTe6Qkv7Fp57Vdb8YKEunVf8fdT5MIJH13qwH7Fx kFqDyfoAGYK3cJAyI5YbR9o3thRpqvgjbmBkhsDCO/oOhqJhIUHhK2YD3PHkoNtP50ff hQ4gIFe11wUlJga9/bktiP0uRMY7Vu8Fn0Ngs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.29.195 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:43:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:43:16 -0400 Received: by 10.216.156.133 with SMTP id m5mr3501546wek.115.1271169796515; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop on demand setup: Failed to retrieve 'hdfs' service address From: Boyu Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64f7fae2baf0804841f487f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64f7fae2baf0804841f487f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks a lot for the reply. I will go over the scripts to see the details. And I am a little confused about which process starts the hdfs and mapreduce daemons, the ringmaster or the hodring? And I am wondering how do the hadoop daemons work once they are up. Do they communicate in the same way without HOD (daemons talk to each other ) or everything has to go through ringmaster and hodring? Thanks a lot for the time and help! Boyu On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Van Workum wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Boyu Zhang wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > > > Sorry to bother again, I am wondering in order to get HOD to work, do we > > need to install all the prerequisite software like passwordless ssh? > Thanks > > a lot! > > SSH is not needed for HOD, it uses pbsdsh to launch processes on the nodes. > > HOD seems to be very sensitive about the python version: 2.4 and 2.6 > don't work, you need 2.5. > > HOD is a little more flexible with Java, 1.5 and 1.6 seem to both work > for me. Also, the most recent versions of Twisted and zope seem to be > fine. > > > > > Boyu > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Van Workum >wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm trying to setup hadoop on demand (HOD) on my cluster. I'm > >> currently unable to "allocate cluster". I'm starting hod with the > >> following command: > >> > >> /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/bin/hod -c > >> /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2/hod/conf/hodrc -t > >> /b/01/vanw/hod/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -o "allocate ~/hod 3" > >> --ringmaster.log-dir=/tmp -b 4 > >> > >> The job starts on the nodes and I see the ringmaster running on the > >> MotherSuperior. The ringmaster-main.log file is created, but is empty. > >> I don't see any associated processes running on the other 2 nodes in > >> the job. > >> > >> The critical errors are as follows: > >> > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,630] CRITICAL/50 hadoop:298 - Failed to retrieve > >> 'hdfs' service address. > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,631] DEBUG/10 hadoop:631 - Cleaning up cluster id > >> 238366.jman, as cluster could not be allocated. > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,632] DEBUG/10 hadoop:635 - Calling rm.stop() > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] DEBUG/10 hadoop:637 - Returning from rm.stop() > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:13,639] CRITICAL/50 hod:401 - Cannot allocate > >> cluster /b/01/vanw/hod > >> [2010-04-06 10:34:14,149] DEBUG/10 hod:597 - return code: 7 > >> > >> The contents of the hodrc file is: > >> > >> [hod] > >> stream = True > >> java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 > >> cluster = orange > >> cluster-factor = 1.8 > >> xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > >> debug = 4 > >> allocate-wait-time = 3600 > >> temp-dir = /tmp/hod > >> > >> [ringmaster] > >> register = True > >> stream = False > >> temp-dir = /tmp/hod > >> http-port-range = 8000-9000 > >> work-dirs = /tmp/hod/1,/tmp/hod/2 > >> xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > >> debug = 4 > >> > >> [hodring] > >> stream = False > >> temp-dir = /tmp/hod > >> register = True > >> java-home = /usr/local/jdk1.6.0_02 > >> http-port-range = 8000-9000 > >> xrs-port-range = 32768-65536 > >> debug = 4 > >> > >> [resource_manager] > >> queue = dque > >> batch-home = /usr/local/torque-2.3.7 > >> id = torque > >> env-vars = > >> HOD_PYTHON_HOME=/usr/local/python-2.5.5/bin/python > >> > >> [gridservice-mapred] > >> external = False > >> pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 > >> tracker_port = 8030 > >> info_port = 50080 > >> > >> [gridservice-hdfs] > >> external = False > >> pkgs = /usr/local/hadoop-0.20.2 > >> fs_port = 8020 > >> info_port = 50070 > >> > >> > >> Some other useful information: > >> Linux 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 > >> Python 2.5.5 > >> Twisted 10.0.0 > >> zope 3.3.0 > >> java version "1.6.0_02" > >> > >> -- > >> Kevin Van Workum, PhD > >> Sabalcore Computing Inc. > >> Run your code on 500 processors. > >> Sign up for a free trial account. > >> www.sabalcore.com > >> 877-492-8027 ext. 11 > >> > > > > > > -- > Kevin Van Workum, PhD > Sabalcore Computing Inc. > Run your code on 500 processors. > Sign up for a free trial account. > www.sabalcore.com > 877-492-8027 ext. 11 > --0016e64f7fae2baf0804841f487f-- From general-return-1363-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 14:47:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57147 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 14:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 14:47:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 71306 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 14:47:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71152 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 14:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71144 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 14:47:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:47:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dan.harvey@mendeley.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:47:16 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so892444fgb.11 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:46:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.121.20 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:46:52 +0100 Received: by 10.223.8.67 with SMTP id g3mr3401542fag.107.1271170012942; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: DBInputFormat number of mappers From: Dan Harvey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517477f2a12112504841f55dc --001517477f2a12112504841f55dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go over the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I can't find a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am running this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of 2 map tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be 10,000,000 then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, and also increasing the number of map tasks per node. But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config file. I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number of rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to change. It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? Thanks, -- Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 --001517477f2a12112504841f55dc-- From general-return-1364-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 15:09:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63474 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 15:09:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 15:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 17724 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 15:09:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17682 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 15:09:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17674 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 15:09:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:09:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dan.harvey@mendeley.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.152] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:09:25 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so1882651fge.11 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:09:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.121.20 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:09:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:09:04 +0100 Received: by 10.223.76.132 with SMTP id c4mr3279325fak.106.1271171344392; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBInputFormat number of mappers From: Dan Harvey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c102e6e624104841fa4f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c102e6e624104841fa4f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Right, after sending this e-mail out that started working straight away with no changes... So setting the number of mappers in the code using :- job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); allowed me to specify the number of splits/map tasks. Which lead me to the second problem I've been getting for awhile. When I start a hadoop job using DBInputFormat as the input if I use 5 splits say one will start straight away and the others will stay in the initializing until it is done then carry on one at a time. This doesn't happen all the time though and using the same code and database some will sometimes start in parallel! I've read this has happened to others before but no clear solution was found then. Has anyone else had this before or found a way to solve it? Thanks, On 13 April 2010 15:46, Dan Harvey wrote: > Hi, > > I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go over > the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I can't find > a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am running > this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of 2 map > tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be 10,000,000 > then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. > > I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : > > job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, and > also increasing the number of map tasks per node. > But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config file. > > I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number of > rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to > change. > > It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? > > Thanks, > > -- > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > -- Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 --0015174c102e6e624104841fa4f0-- From general-return-1365-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 15:30:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68792 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 15:30:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 15:30:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 43600 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 15:30:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43558 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 15:30:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43544 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 15:30:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:30:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fzappert@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.187] (HELO mail-qy0-f187.google.com) (209.85.221.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:29:58 +0000 Received: by qyk17 with SMTP id 17so2985995qyk.9 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:29:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Mxzf4ioWN+BrTjKY1T7xiuXn5SuVqAXLpomUhqQ7Za8=; b=Y7p6MbWFNgReb/yvghmWxf/OAjwveTH7MpN+YR9CZklsOpzG21DAmM4U92Q5m/7MKf ndjnuEaxyNRiT5VhyLILx2iIvwcEOLu9dfeTs7uqe32wm9J0l1Uic+J2LGjzV8goT7jF Xd0bVAwKTep7iKV4p2QE2zvRfom6pThiBoXt0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=k+slzFwYrTLM2DWrvswu/KgyfZbU/EXvVERkckGuQFE1E04m/06+vrTyiHDHTGL5Hq d3qAxEIURXG8KHJMvVrWtipdaDavH8VO+koQ2VUW0EK2MB7xv8VELxH96sXorHSR7o1b 5GW4HO72t0ALylib9If0q8S+GGYD4qMKnQEmg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.17 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:29:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <601540.54306.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:29:37 -0700 Received: by 10.229.224.79 with SMTP id in15mr2179104qcb.76.1271172577435; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Fred Zappert To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8edced1f8004841fedd1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b8edced1f8004841fedd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 Fred Zappert W: (206) 266-8375 M: (415) 640-2980 http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredzappert On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Imran M Yousuf wrote: > +1 > > /Imran > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze > wrote: > > +1 > > Nicholas Sze > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Stack > >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >> Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 8:56:51 AM > >> Subject: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? > >> > >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > > Apache > >> project. > > > > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all > >> current > > active HBase committers as initial members of the project > >> management > > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial > >> chair. > > > > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to > >> the Hadoop PMC? > > > > Yours, > > St.Ack > > > > ------------ > > > > X. > >> Establish the Apache HBase Project > > > > WHEREAS, the > >> Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests > >> of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's > >> purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee > >> charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source > >> software related to data serialization > > for distribution > >> at no charge to the public. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT > >> RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to > >> be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > > be and hereby is > >> established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > Foundation; and be > >> it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project > >> be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and > >> maintenance of software > > related to a distributed > >> database; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the > >> office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > > and hereby > >> is created, the person holding such office to > > serve at > >> the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > of > >> the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > > > >> for management of the projects within the scope of > > > >> responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it > >> further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed > >> immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve > >> as the initial members of the > > Apache HBase > >> Project: > > > > * Michael Stack < > >> ymailto="mailto:stack@apache.org" > >> href="mailto:stack@apache.org">stack@apache.org> > > > >> * Jonathan Gray < > >> href="mailto:jgray@apache.org">jgray@apache.org> > > > >> * Andrew Purtell < > >> href="mailto:apurtell@apache.org">apurtell@apache.org> > > > >> * John-Daniel Cryans < > >> href="mailto:jdcryans@apache.org">jdcryans@apache.org> > > > >> * Ryan Rawson < > >> href="mailto:rawson@apache.org">rawson@apache.org> > > > >> * Lars George < > >> href="mailto:larsgeorge@apache.org">larsgeorge@apache.org> > > > > > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael > >> Stack > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, > >> Apache HBase, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to > >> the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws > >> of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, > >> removal or disqualification, > > or until a successor is > >> appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the > >> initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > > tasked with > >> the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > > encourage > >> open development and increased participation in the > > > >> Apache HBase Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, > >> that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > > is tasked > >> with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > > >> Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further > > > > > >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > > >> Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > > > >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > -- > Imran M Yousuf > Entrepreneur & Software Engineer > Smart IT Engineering > Dhaka, Bangladesh > Email: imran@smartitengineering.com > Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/ > Mobile: +880-1711402557 > --0016363b8edced1f8004841fedd1-- From general-return-1366-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 16:45:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66478 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 16:26:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 16:26:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 77171 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:26:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76998 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:26:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76852 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 16:26:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:26:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:26:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.72.76.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3DGOc6Q047370 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: JIRA snafu? Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:24:38 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone else? thanks, Arun From general-return-1368-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 17:41:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48804 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 16:47:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 16:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 49225 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:47:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49147 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 16:47:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:47:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:47:11 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3DGjO9g059169 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=TOA4iqzOsu7Rqe6W70qR6uRvovClPblyY3Imqme7vsKXmhVNITpWW79FjLk5hMIQ Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:45:23 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:45:22 -0700 Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? Thread-Topic: JIRA snafu? Thread-Index: AcrbJkQcbpRQsmXsTsOd4RXS9cdrrwAAm/6S Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7E9EDB021894sureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7E9EDB021894sureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had the same problem yesterday. On 4/13/10 8:24 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone else? thanks, Arun --_000_C7E9EDB021894sureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1367-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 17:43:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47005 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 16:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 16:46:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 40558 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:46:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40513 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:46:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40501 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 16:46:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:46:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:46:26 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=ZW9feciwglknhNWv+jztcWtubch8LdI3Ljpy4fPrHIWQpijNkW8W0O+g 6QIf1IL4mcZZIy0usnHXh/9lrCEhZMAV7CFkaJsAu/DLscsSDs4tJFIJ6 lhPMUWBwJpzB/r2; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1271177186; x=1302713186; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20JIRA=20snafu?|Date:=20Tue,=2013=20Apr =202010=2016:46:04=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<0FF6B01F-2F20-4 9B2-B689-94B544637CBD@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<016fd015-e61b-46c7-8829-824e3f0b c526>|In-Reply-To:=20<1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815E E@yahoo-inc.com>|References:=20<1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-7 4781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com>; bh=Qp5qkxCufDNrqmyOepO1QqAXf1s8jJzicyCwqsFDuZ8=; b=uI9v0FZxH+yjezlWS0BuBCIUsaOhfrtiCsmHWYlAGWc8opGcJJUB4Wc0 N3erhoLbryYnX6zJ1UjckHy3ymKHx3eCy5UOpfZQurQtmoFg9CvcKJSiW M+jbweZXONdQAbf; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,198,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12290539" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:46:05 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:46:04 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:46:04 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? Thread-Topic: JIRA snafu? Thread-Index: AQHK2yYM3Wjwn2J7K0+LJWJ86ZUH7JIhEKkA Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:46:04 +0000 Message-ID: <0FF6B01F-2F20-49B2-B689-94B544637CBD@linkedin.com> References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <016fd015-e61b-46c7-8829-824e3f0bc526> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Apr 2010 16:46:05.0452 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF2D7CC0:01CADB28] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone= else? I haven't tried, but likely related to issues.apache.org getting compromise= d. From general-return-1369-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:53:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72896 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:13:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:13:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 18174 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:13:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17998 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17990 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:13:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:13:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:13:02 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1775859wyb.35 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IznoQf8HMT+CZ7NRKQOIR1e7mFfZ7LLioKYyJvzsKjY=; b=jwYGpJ8I36PxO0TSX3Qb+klHIwO+JYJVPIH87XTv86TC4A/UHjDgMLe12hXKAVCu+z 8sX9SXGYXmQsVlu4PxCSqBHypyhhGiWiHTKPOPA3PjwymXZHM3scWVkVAgPYYa2nwdCL ocQfVPlywTe1ks9daOoMr1IY3fu/wOy0PUUdU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=i+qkSuOuATqPoyi/6VoU/XDRUvH3KTCblM3CbGpApvtMyENWOMwDG1JE53uwtSxrHX EQabUHrQ4R8P72g2JyD7dwIR6NSF0/4MjsK2QwWDrQpdtLCobY4vMP1a15g0wkuku93n cpZ5zdvBKNndmWc/zcegrvLXuqnjahV0aC4A0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.230.75 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:12:40 +0200 Received: by 10.216.88.212 with SMTP id a62mr3610842wef.72.1271178760481; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 AFAIK, JIRA has been re-installed. (BTW, please change your passwords.) You can report this on IRC #asfinfra, or infrastructure@a.o. Bernd On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 18:24, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone > else? > > thanks, > Arun > From general-return-1370-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:54:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80359 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:14:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:14:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 23877 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:14:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23840 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:14:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23832 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:14:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:14:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:14:10 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3DHDRRC072588 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=JU18knTudHEEGvysag2LTv2rqqt26p34QqrLR7dqYrv7QVFmrV+7ChE8m+UW5sIA Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:13:26 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:13:26 -0700 Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? Thread-Topic: JIRA snafu? Thread-Index: AcrbJkQcbpRQsmXsTsOd4RXS9cdrrwAAm/6SAAD6yQE= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7E9F443218A2sureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7E9F443218A2sureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I also see that File Attachments no longer show time when the attachment wa= s uploaded. On 4/13/10 9:45 AM, "Suresh Srinivas" wrote: I had the same problem yesterday. On 4/13/10 8:24 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone else? thanks, Arun --_000_C7E9F443218A2sureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1371-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 06:47:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88933 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 06:47:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 06:47:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 74770 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:47:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74550 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:47:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74541 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 06:47:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:47:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:46:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 88828 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 06:46:35 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:46:35 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so6166878iwn.29 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:46:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.78 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:46:34 +0100 Received: by 10.231.60.19 with SMTP id n19mr3123479ibh.79.1271227594823; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Subprojects and TLP status From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Most of Hadoop's subprojects have discussed becoming top-level Apache projects (TLPs) in the last few weeks. Most have expressed a desire to remain in Hadoop. The salient parts of the discussions I've read tend to focus on three aspects: a technical dependence on Hadoop, additional overhead as a TLP, and visibility both within the Hadoop ecosystem and in the open source community generally. Life as a TLP: this is not much harder than being a Hadoop subproject, and the Apache preferences being tossed around- particularly "insufficiently diverse"- are not blockers. Every subproject needs to write a section of the report Hadoop sends to the board; almost the same report, sent to a new address. The initial cost is similarly light: copy bylaws, send a few notes to INFRA, and follow some directions. I think the estimated costs are far higher than they will be in practice. Inertia is a powerful force, but it should be overcome. The directions are here, and should not intimidating: http://apache.org/dev/project-creation.html Visibility: the Hadoop site does not need to change. For each subproject, we can literally change the hyperlinks to point to the new page and be done. Long-term, linking to all ASF projects that run on Hadoop from a prominent page is something we all want. So particularly in the medium-term that most are considering: visibility through the website will not change. Each subproject will still be linked from the front page. Hadoop would not be nearly as popular as it is without Zookeeper, HBase, Hive, and Pig. All statistics on work in shared MapReduce clusters show that users vastly prefer running Pig and Hive queries to writing MapReduce jobs. HBase continues to push features in HDFS that increase its adoption and relevance outside MapReduce, while sharing some of its NoSQL limelight. Zookeeper is not only a linchpin in real workloads, but many proposals for future features require it. The bottom line is that MapReduce and HDFS need these projects for visibility and adoption in precisely the same way. I don't think separate TLPs will uncouple the broader community from one another. Technical dependence: this has two dimensions. First, influencing MapReduce and HDFS. This is nonsense. Earning influence by contributing to a subproject is the only way to push code changes; nobody from any of these projects has violated that by unilaterally committing to HDFS or MapReduce, anyway. And anyone cynical enough to believe that MapReduce and HDFS would deliberately screw over or ignore dependent projects because they don't have PMC members is plainly unsuited to community-driven development. I understand that these projects need to protect their users, but lobbying rights are not an actual benefit. Second, being a coherent part of the Hadoop ecosystem. It is (mostly) true that Hadoop current offers a set of mutually compatible frameworks. It is not true that moving them to separate Apache projects would make solutions less coherent or affect existing or future users at all. The cohesion between projects' governance is sufficiently weak to justify independent units, but the real dependencies between the projects are strong enough to keep us engaged with one another. And it's not as if other projects- Cascading, for example- aren't also organisms adapted and specialized for life in Hadoop. Arguments on technical dependence are ignoring the nature of the existing interactions. Besides, weak technical dependencies are not a necessary prerequisite for a subproject's independence. As for what was *not* said in these discussions, there is no argument that every one of these subprojects has a distinct, autonomous community. There was also no argument that the Hadoop PMC offers any valuable oversight, given that the representatives of its fiefdoms are too consumed by provincial matters to participate in neighboring governance. Most releases I've voted on: I run the unit tests, check the signature, verify the checksum, and know literally nothing else about its content. I have often never heard the names of many proposed committers and even some proposed PMC members. Right now, subprojects with enough PMC members essentially vote out their own releases and vote in their own committers: TLPs in all but name. The Hadoop club- in conferences, meetups, technical debates, etc.- is broad, diverse, and intertwined, but communities of developers have already clustered around subprojects. Allowing that each cluster should govern itself is a dry, practical matter, not an existential crisis. -C From general-return-1372-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 07:59:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26671 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 07:59:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 07:59:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 32073 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 07:59:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31819 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 07:59:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31807 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 07:59:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:59:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:59:46 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so2059592wyb.35 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jwprcb6KNuuva2ym2Ovn8qJ6ZBe6nGUJe92eaoe8+yc=; b=XXRoTOJERZc90jB9u3c+4xIf3RZdiGNA24CB+tfB4gg22rvcMEB7JYIRZqpV7Wlft5 JbUBZKbTEKJPQ6rCk6aPVGnkvAmSP8x8U+NdH17KirSoBX9fxfUE1H6N4HibIculLEDa ptVLzuBFtcpLVVXqBx6v+4fNufLbJFwb1zs8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aNQ03/MwiGo9QIdzEMnYtBFZh/G3rY3STksjBpVYwr4Q+9R3UNiEtlMl2i2Y/U4O0v 0up4oBK0WuXFdZWy17ouaA7FcU5u27IADNhnQ/k9pzMr9wrJvqO9p39iQmGZGUZwcvFi u2GjYDxwzz26OeltF13YxQjEQJJzSmANAViWY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.230.75 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:59:25 +0200 Received: by 10.216.157.141 with SMTP id o13mr4604242wek.163.1271231965354; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2615 Bernd On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 19:12, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > AFAIK, JIRA has been re-installed. > (BTW, please change your passwords.) > > You can report this on IRC #asfinfra, or infrastructure@a.o. > > =A0Bernd > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 18:24, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyon= e >> else? >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> > From general-return-1373-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 10:36:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29884 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 10:36:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 10:36:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 14844 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 10:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14698 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 10:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14690 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 10:36:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:36:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796BCB7E68 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:31 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pKVDObYYTa9h for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C1DB7E67 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:30 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271846118.65709@smvIvwtpwU4Z6vsUIXRz8w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3EAZHej006411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:18 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BC59A65.20701@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:35:17 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3EAZHej006411 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Arun C Murthy wrote: > I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. > Anyone else? the emergency release of jira doesn't have the extra legal stuff, until they get that in you are being viewed as implicitly granting permissions. -steve From general-return-1374-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 11:02:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44386 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 11:02:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 11:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 33830 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 11:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33647 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 11:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33639 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 11:02:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:02:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:02:12 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so2123112wyb.35 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E2kCG+6ctZSMeryH1JoW2ahEDc51Sw2IxIT5++qCAgQ=; b=EOixUV13aO3/l94JAIm7vjx2liHlCPL7qQ3u4Y3HpmgEEFkl1YDZPFo4KN5iTfxbRS X3Sr328LCfWLO2wrNQ8X1rxbjvFw68k/QRIv1VVturvoLPZUPM7EfKiwse/DojZL30ts WD6WhISeeAMuqLacYxcigRLB/N+RYr3Z12SNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qm1LZp3Pj0QFkUM4hhMnHde/I5AWanbg1g/MjZJrmsGju+UJmP0p/VzXMn5qxgxkCf yxUyJc4BwDqj4/EmulAFVTZsdx1Pq5+kQVtXdvm+LEufWU5K7t/J/4zEJcuePlQgiAcQ kIHPasWtPbusdONZXW7qYw/IohA4U89vvdq50= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.230.75 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC59A65.20701@apache.org> References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> <4BC59A65.20701@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:01:51 +0200 Received: by 10.216.157.141 with SMTP id o13mr4842480wek.163.1271242911564; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:35, Steve Loughran wrote: > Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >> I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone >> else? > > the emergency release of jira doesn't have the extra legal stuff, until they > get that in you are being viewed as implicitly granting permissions. But it would help if contributors would explicitly comment that they grant permission. In a few months at least I won't be able to remember when and if JIRA had been down. Bernd From general-return-1375-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 11:49:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78270 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 11:49:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 11:49:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 94847 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 11:49:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94652 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 11:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94644 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 11:49:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:49:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:48:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F83B7E77 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:48:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Dy9pdRmrzZXV for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:48:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8D2B7E65 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:48:30 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271850499.2477@GylAWR+PGAAbfBceDCZUng Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3EBmHHg008093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:48:18 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BC5AB81.3040103@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:48:17 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> <4BC59A65.20701@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3EBmHHg008093 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:35, Steve Loughran wrote: >> Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. Anyone >>> else? >> the emergency release of jira doesn't have the extra legal stuff, until they >> get that in you are being viewed as implicitly granting permissions. > > But it would help if contributors would explicitly comment that they > grant permission. > In a few months at least I won't be able to remember when and if JIRA > had been down. +1 From general-return-1376-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 13:40:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50506 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 13:40:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 13:40:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 84909 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 13:40:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84794 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 13:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84786 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 13:40:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:40:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:40:14 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3EDN29s000499 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:23:02 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 185C848F1A0F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:39:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id E2nTUvylN58lE8bs for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:39:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3EDdq2X014035 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:39:52 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:39:52 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:39:50 -0500 Subject: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrb1/TEma6fZVD1SWq9JJCGy5HxHw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607C7E2CBhqexmb02adnav_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607C7E2CBhqexmb02adnav_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Hi, Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which = calls other 3rd party classes. An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /lib= directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a later= release of the same jar. You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is = to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of m= ethods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the= m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? Has anyone done something like this? Thx -Mike Michael Segel Architect, R&D NAVTEQ 425 West Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60606 (T) +1 312-780-3432 (C) +1 312-952-8175 www.navteq.com The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. --_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607C7E2CBhqexmb02adnav_-- From general-return-1377-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 14:49:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98762 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 14:49:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 14:49:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 8945 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 14:49:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8799 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 14:49:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8787 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 14:49:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:49:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:48:56 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so217621bwz.11 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.78.211 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:48:33 -0700 Received: by 10.204.140.70 with SMTP id h6mr8689551bku.1.1271256513906; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Subprojects and TLP status From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 Thank you for writing this, Chris. Tom On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Most of Hadoop's subprojects have discussed becoming top-level Apache > projects (TLPs) in the last few weeks. Most have expressed a desire to > remain in Hadoop. The salient parts of the discussions I've read tend > to focus on three aspects: a technical dependence on Hadoop, > additional overhead as a TLP, and visibility both within the Hadoop > ecosystem and in the open source community generally. > > Life as a TLP: this is not much harder than being a Hadoop subproject, > and the Apache preferences being tossed around- particularly > "insufficiently diverse"- are not blockers. Every subproject needs to > write a section of the report Hadoop sends to the board; almost the > same report, sent to a new address. The initial cost is similarly > light: copy bylaws, send a few notes to INFRA, and follow some > directions. I think the estimated costs are far higher than they will > be in practice. Inertia is a powerful force, but it should be > overcome. The directions are here, and should not intimidating: > > http://apache.org/dev/project-creation.html > > Visibility: the Hadoop site does not need to change. For each > subproject, we can literally change the hyperlinks to point to the new > page and be done. Long-term, linking to all ASF projects that run on > Hadoop from a prominent page is something we all want. So particularly > in the medium-term that most are considering: visibility through the > website will not change. Each subproject will still be linked from the > front page. > > Hadoop would not be nearly as popular as it is without Zookeeper, > HBase, Hive, and Pig. All statistics on work in shared MapReduce > clusters show that users vastly prefer running Pig and Hive queries to > writing MapReduce jobs. HBase continues to push features in HDFS that > increase its adoption and relevance outside MapReduce, while sharing > some of its NoSQL limelight. Zookeeper is not only a linchpin in real > workloads, but many proposals for future features require it. The > bottom line is that MapReduce and HDFS need these projects for > visibility and adoption in precisely the same way. I don't think > separate TLPs will uncouple the broader community from one another. > > Technical dependence: this has two dimensions. First, influencing > MapReduce and HDFS. This is nonsense. Earning influence by > contributing to a subproject is the only way to push code changes; > nobody from any of these projects has violated that by unilaterally > committing to HDFS or MapReduce, anyway. And anyone cynical enough to > believe that MapReduce and HDFS would deliberately screw over or > ignore dependent projects because they don't have PMC members is > plainly unsuited to community-driven development. I understand that > these projects need to protect their users, but lobbying rights are > not an actual benefit. > > Second, being a coherent part of the Hadoop ecosystem. It is (mostly) > true that Hadoop current offers a set of mutually compatible > frameworks. It is not true that moving them to separate Apache > projects would make solutions less coherent or affect existing or > future users at all. The cohesion between projects' governance is > sufficiently weak to justify independent units, but the real > dependencies between the projects are strong enough to keep us engaged > with one another. And it's not as if other projects- Cascading, for > example- aren't also organisms adapted and specialized for life in > Hadoop. > > Arguments on technical dependence are ignoring the nature of the > existing interactions. Besides, weak technical dependencies are not a > necessary prerequisite for a subproject's independence. > > As for what was *not* said in these discussions, there is no argument > that every one of these subprojects has a distinct, autonomous > community. There was also no argument that the Hadoop PMC offers any > valuable oversight, given that the representatives of its fiefdoms are > too consumed by provincial matters to participate in neighboring > governance. Most releases I've voted on: I run the unit tests, check > the signature, verify the checksum, and know literally nothing else > about its content. I have often never heard the names of many proposed > committers and even some proposed PMC members. Right now, subprojects > with enough PMC members essentially vote out their own releases and > vote in their own committers: TLPs in all but name. > > The Hadoop club- in conferences, meetups, technical debates, etc.- is > broad, diverse, and intertwined, but communities of developers have > already clustered around subprojects. Allowing that each cluster > should govern itself is a dry, practical matter, not an existential > crisis. -C > From general-return-1378-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 14:56:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3680 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 14:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 14:56:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 41012 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 14:56:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40913 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 14:56:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40905 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 14:56:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:56:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:56:43 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so226292bwz.11 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.78.211 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:56:17 -0700 Received: by 10.204.35.75 with SMTP id o11mr8450184bkd.214.1271256977447; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I agree that it writing a custom classloader is non-trivial (and I don't know if anyone has done this in the MapReduce context), so this would best be handled by the framework. I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1700 for this. Tom On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre =A0issue... > > How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which = calls other 3rd party classes. > > An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /lib= directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a later r= elease of the same jar. > > You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is = to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) > > Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of m= ethods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the m= /r jobs can have access to them on each node. > > Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? > Has anyone done something like this? > > Thx > > -Mike > > Michael Segel > Architect, =A0R&D > NAVTEQ > 425 West Randolph Street > Chicago, IL 60606 > (T) =A0+1 312-780-3432 > (C) =A0+1 312-952-8175 > www.navteq.com > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. =A0If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is= strictly prohibited. =A0If you have received this communication in error, = please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any co= py of it from your computer or paper files. > From general-return-1379-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 16:21:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65353 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 16:21:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 16:21:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 22921 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 16:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22853 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 16:21:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22833 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 16:21:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:21:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:21:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([10.72.168.172]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3EGJqdB096170; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:19:51 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Cc: "private@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Subprojects and TLP status Message-ID: <20100414161949.GA28485@goodenter-lm.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Grid computing (Hadoop) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Great summing up of the Hadoop business as it is today. +1 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:46PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Most of Hadoop's subprojects have discussed becoming top-level Apache > projects (TLPs) in the last few weeks. Most have expressed a desire to > remain in Hadoop. The salient parts of the discussions I've read tend > to focus on three aspects: a technical dependence on Hadoop, > additional overhead as a TLP, and visibility both within the Hadoop > ecosystem and in the open source community generally. > > Life as a TLP: this is not much harder than being a Hadoop subproject, > and the Apache preferences being tossed around- particularly > "insufficiently diverse"- are not blockers. Every subproject needs to > write a section of the report Hadoop sends to the board; almost the > same report, sent to a new address. The initial cost is similarly > light: copy bylaws, send a few notes to INFRA, and follow some > directions. I think the estimated costs are far higher than they will > be in practice. Inertia is a powerful force, but it should be > overcome. The directions are here, and should not intimidating: > > http://apache.org/dev/project-creation.html > > Visibility: the Hadoop site does not need to change. For each > subproject, we can literally change the hyperlinks to point to the new > page and be done. Long-term, linking to all ASF projects that run on > Hadoop from a prominent page is something we all want. So particularly > in the medium-term that most are considering: visibility through the > website will not change. Each subproject will still be linked from the > front page. > > Hadoop would not be nearly as popular as it is without Zookeeper, > HBase, Hive, and Pig. All statistics on work in shared MapReduce > clusters show that users vastly prefer running Pig and Hive queries to > writing MapReduce jobs. HBase continues to push features in HDFS that > increase its adoption and relevance outside MapReduce, while sharing > some of its NoSQL limelight. Zookeeper is not only a linchpin in real > workloads, but many proposals for future features require it. The > bottom line is that MapReduce and HDFS need these projects for > visibility and adoption in precisely the same way. I don't think > separate TLPs will uncouple the broader community from one another. > > Technical dependence: this has two dimensions. First, influencing > MapReduce and HDFS. This is nonsense. Earning influence by > contributing to a subproject is the only way to push code changes; > nobody from any of these projects has violated that by unilaterally > committing to HDFS or MapReduce, anyway. And anyone cynical enough to > believe that MapReduce and HDFS would deliberately screw over or > ignore dependent projects because they don't have PMC members is > plainly unsuited to community-driven development. I understand that > these projects need to protect their users, but lobbying rights are > not an actual benefit. > > Second, being a coherent part of the Hadoop ecosystem. It is (mostly) > true that Hadoop current offers a set of mutually compatible > frameworks. It is not true that moving them to separate Apache > projects would make solutions less coherent or affect existing or > future users at all. The cohesion between projects' governance is > sufficiently weak to justify independent units, but the real > dependencies between the projects are strong enough to keep us engaged > with one another. And it's not as if other projects- Cascading, for > example- aren't also organisms adapted and specialized for life in > Hadoop. > > Arguments on technical dependence are ignoring the nature of the > existing interactions. Besides, weak technical dependencies are not a > necessary prerequisite for a subproject's independence. > > As for what was *not* said in these discussions, there is no argument > that every one of these subprojects has a distinct, autonomous > community. There was also no argument that the Hadoop PMC offers any > valuable oversight, given that the representatives of its fiefdoms are > too consumed by provincial matters to participate in neighboring > governance. Most releases I've voted on: I run the unit tests, check > the signature, verify the checksum, and know literally nothing else > about its content. I have often never heard the names of many proposed > committers and even some proposed PMC members. Right now, subprojects > with enough PMC members essentially vote out their own releases and > vote in their own committers: TLPs in all but name. > > The Hadoop club- in conferences, meetups, technical debates, etc.- is > broad, diverse, and intertwined, but communities of developers have > already clustered around subprojects. Allowing that each cluster > should govern itself is a dry, practical matter, not an existential > crisis. -C From general-return-1380-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 16:29:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69318 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 16:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 16:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 33249 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 16:29:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33217 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 16:29:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33209 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 16:29:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:29:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:28:56 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so204838wwb.35 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:28:35 -0700 Received: by 10.216.90.9 with SMTP id d9mr4463118wef.95.1271262515364; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBInputFormat number of mappers From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If you're performing a simple import of an entire table, sqoop may make your life easier. It gives you a reasonable command line client for importing single tables or an entire database (provided there is a JDBC driver available for it). Sqoop comes with Cloudera's distribution for Hadoop or you can snag the source from http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop If sqoop isn't appealing for some reason, you can at least take a look at the code and see what Aaron did under the hood. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Dan Harvey wrote: > Right, after sending this e-mail out that started working straight away with > no changes... So setting the number of mappers in the code using :- > > job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > allowed me to specify the number of splits/map tasks. > > Which lead me to the second problem I've been getting for awhile. When I > start a hadoop job using DBInputFormat as the input if I use 5 splits say > one will start straight away and the others will stay in the initializing > until it is done then carry on one at a time. This doesn't happen all the > time though and using the same code and database some will sometimes start > in parallel! > > I've read this has happened to others before but no clear solution was found > then. > > Has anyone else had this before or found a way to solve it? > > Thanks, > > On 13 April 2010 15:46, Dan Harvey wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go over >> the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I can't find >> a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am running >> this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of 2 map >> tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be 10,000,000 >> then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. >> >> I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : >> >> job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); >> >> increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, and >> also increasing the number of map tasks per node. >> But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config file. >> >> I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number of >> rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to >> change. >> >> It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer >> www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey >> >> Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com >> Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 >> > > > > -- > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > -- Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1381-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 17:03:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89003 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 17:03:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 17:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 83730 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:03:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83616 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:03:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83608 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 17:03:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:03:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.19] (HELO EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:03:19 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.19]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:02:58 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:01:38 -0700 Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrb9FSGrtsm/Ye1TKucQGBMPunIbQ== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it fr= om hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory and = that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, the fe= ature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump in JS= ON format) so I just removed the jar. -Scott =20 On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... >=20 > How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which = calls other 3rd party classes. >=20 > An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /lib= directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a later r= elease of the same jar. >=20 > You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is = to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) >=20 > Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of m= ethods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the m= /r jobs can have access to them on each node. >=20 > Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? > Has anyone done something like this? >=20 > Thx >=20 > -Mike >=20 > Michael Segel > Architect, R&D > NAVTEQ > 425 West Randolph Street > Chicago, IL 60606 > (T) +1 312-780-3432 > (C) +1 312-952-8175 > www.navteq.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are no= t the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, d= istribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is s= trictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, plea= se notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy o= f it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1382-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 17:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93699 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 17:17:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 17:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 3454 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3415 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3407 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:17:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:17:14 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-247-251.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-mc2e-247-251.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.149.251]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3EHFcbj051189 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:15:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=RpR/PlHYZSCxCHs4a6PN5ErArhJK/j0E82x/oWGpDe3y9Jy2BSKnPzbwZN+kshCy Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-900362466 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:15:38 -0700 References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> <4BC59A65.20701@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-1-900362466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:01 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:35, Steve Loughran > wrote: >> Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> >>> I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. >>> Anyone >>> else? >> >> the emergency release of jira doesn't have the extra legal stuff, >> until they >> get that in you are being viewed as implicitly granting permissions. > > But it would help if contributors would explicitly comment that they > grant permission. > In a few months at least I won't be able to remember when and if JIRA > had been down. > +1 Case in point: http://tinyurl.com/yyfnfz6 Arun --Apple-Mail-1-900362466-- From general-return-1383-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 17:34:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3712 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 17:34:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 17:34:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 35772 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:34:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35583 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:34:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35575 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 17:34:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:34:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:33:57 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3EHFUev004772 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:15:30 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 368FA3C44FE6 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:33:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id xNpVKVEadViZYcbO for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:33:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3EHXaGq014896 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:33:36 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:33:30 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:33:29 -0500 Subject: RE: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrb9FSGrtsm/Ye1TKucQGBMPunIbQAA9n4g Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott, While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution an= d you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release and = the removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to get= overwritten. In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important a= nd they can be replaced. But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its somethi= ng you can't easily pop out and replace. This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understand = what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class.=20 Thx -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it = from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory an= d that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, th= e feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump= in JSON format) so I just removed the jar. -Scott =20 On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... >=20 > How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job whic= h calls other 3rd party classes. >=20 > An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /l= ib directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a lat= er release of the same jar. >=20 > You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way i= s to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) >=20 > Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of= methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that t= he m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. >=20 > Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? > Has anyone done something like this? >=20 > Thx >=20 > -Mike >=20 > Michael Segel > Architect, R&D > NAVTEQ > 425 West Randolph Street > Chicago, IL 60606 > (T) +1 312-780-3432 > (C) +1 312-952-8175 > www.navteq.com >=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you ar= e not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminat= ion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conten= ts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in e= rror, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message an= d any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1384-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 17:55:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19670 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 17:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 17:55:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 79982 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:55:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79876 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 17:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79867 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 17:55:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:55:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of invisiblesun@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:55:46 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.27.35.143] (c-67-169-39-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.39.169]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L0V0055OOG0GK60@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1004140192 Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? From: Julia Smith In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:55:11 -0700 Message-id: <19CC33EF-FA84-46CB-B61D-385CB92688A5@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) This might be of use to you, as I had a related problem years ago: http://www.developertutorials.com/tutorials/java/simplify-application-delivery-one-jar-050422/page5.html The trick is a one-jar solution allows you to embed jar files and load classes from them. Rolling up all your jar variants in a single jar and then selectively loading the desired version might provide you a useful solution. The source is there, so you could start with a working classloader and perhaps apply a few tweaks. On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Scott, > > While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution and you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release and the removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to get overwritten. > > In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important and they can be replaced. > But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its something you can't easily pop out and replace. > > This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understand what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class. > > Thx > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. > > For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory and that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, the feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump in JSON format) so I just removed the jar. > > -Scott > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... >> >> How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which calls other 3rd party classes. >> >> An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /lib directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a later release of the same jar. >> >> You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) >> >> Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. >> >> Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? >> Has anyone done something like this? >> >> Thx >> >> -Mike >> >> Michael Segel >> Architect, R&D >> NAVTEQ >> 425 West Randolph Street >> Chicago, IL 60606 >> (T) +1 312-780-3432 >> (C) +1 312-952-8175 >> www.navteq.com >> >> >> >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1385-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 18:09:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31147 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 18:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 18:09:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3893 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 18:09:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3797 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 18:09:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3789 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 18:09:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:09:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:09:45 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:09:25 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:08:06 -0700 Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrb/Z03qb+/Dhq2Q4uKqzSDobm4rA== Message-ID: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 My long term suggestions are in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPRE= DUCE-1700. The framework definitely needs to handle this and not place the= burden on users, IMO. But that won't help you in the short term. Whether removing or replacing a Hadoop jar is an acceptable option to you (= or others) in the short term is up to you. Obviously, its not a great long= term solution but if you (or someone else) has to make it work ASAP, it mi= ght be the only option. In our case, we package our own rpm and have a few= custom patches to Hadoop so removing one jar is a trivial thing to do in t= he short / medium term. -Scott On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Scott, >=20 > While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution an= d you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release and th= e removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to get ove= rwritten. >=20 > In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important a= nd they can be replaced. > But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its somethi= ng you can't easily pop out and replace. >=20 > This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understand = what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class.=20 >=20 > Thx >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? >=20 > Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it = from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. >=20 > For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory an= d that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, the = feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump in = JSON format) so I just removed the jar. >=20 > -Scott >=20 > On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... >>=20 >> How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which= calls other 3rd party classes. >>=20 >> An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /li= b directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a later = release of the same jar. >>=20 >> You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is= to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) >>=20 >> Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of = methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the = m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. >>=20 >> Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? >> Has anyone done something like this? >>=20 >> Thx >>=20 >> -Mike >>=20 >> Michael Segel >> Architect, R&D >> NAVTEQ >> 425 West Randolph Street >> Chicago, IL 60606 >> (T) +1 312-780-3432 >> (C) +1 312-952-8175 >> www.navteq.com >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and = is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are n= ot the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is = strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, ple= ase notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy = of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are no= t the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, d= istribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is s= trictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, plea= se notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy o= f it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1386-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 18:20:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37446 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 18:20:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 18:20:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 17984 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 18:20:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17947 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 18:20:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17939 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 18:20:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:20:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chris.cooper@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:20:12 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3EI1i9w006908 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:01:44 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 098894318401 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id YsB8whFHrccGj39t for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3EIJnGq020175 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:50 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::1dd0:ea36:7d35:db66]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:49 -0500 From: "Cooper, Chris" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:19:49 -0500 Subject: RE: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrb/Z03qb+/Dhq2Q4uKqzSDobm4rAAAJeNg Message-ID: <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> In-Reply-To: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott, I think the direction your comments in https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro= wse/MAPREDUCE-1700 is spot on. You should be looking at J2EE container c= lass loader hierarchies. I've attached a couple of good links that cover= this approach. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0112_deb= oer/deboer.html http://www.objectsource.com/j2eechapters/Ch21-ClassLoaders_and_J2EE.htm I'm sure Mike and I would both be willing to work with you to contribute = a solution if you're interested. Best regards, CC -----Original Message----- From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:08 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? My long term suggestions are in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAP= REDUCE-1700. The framework definitely needs to handle this and not place= the burden on users, IMO. But that won't help you in the short term. Whether removing or replacing a Hadoop jar is an acceptable option to you= (or others) in the short term is up to you. Obviously, its not a great = long term solution but if you (or someone else) has to make it work ASAP,= it might be the only option. In our case, we package our own rpm and ha= ve a few custom patches to Hadoop so removing one jar is a trivial thing = to do in the short / medium term. -Scott On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Scott, >=20 > While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution = and you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release an= d the removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to g= et overwritten. >=20 > In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important= and they can be replaced. > But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its somet= hing you can't easily pop out and replace. >=20 > This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understan= d what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class.=20 >=20 > Thx >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? >=20 > Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove i= t from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. >=20 > For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory = and that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, = the feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration du= mp in JSON format) so I just removed the jar. >=20 > -Scott >=20 > On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... >>=20 >> How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job whi= ch calls other 3rd party classes. >>=20 >> An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its /= lib directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a la= ter release of the same jar. >>=20 >> You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way = is to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) >>=20 >> Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple o= f methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that = the m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. >>=20 >> Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? >> Has anyone done something like this? >>=20 >> Thx >>=20 >> -Mike >>=20 >> Michael Segel >> Architect, R&D >> NAVTEQ >> 425 West Randolph Street >> Chicago, IL 60606 >> (T) +1 312-780-3432 >> (C) +1 312-952-8175 >> www.navteq.com >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL an= d is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you a= re not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemina= tion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conte= nts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in = error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message a= nd any copy of it from your computer or paper files. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you ar= e not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminat= ion, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its conten= ts, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in e= rror, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message an= d any copy of it from your computer or paper files. The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1387-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 20:30:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81376 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 20:30:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 20:30:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 15605 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 20:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15542 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 20:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15300 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 20:29:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:29:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:29:52 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so223157qwh.35 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jJpi4DAfLgk3fueXPg2WT9yFzK1WWuXVC096WQZ2PQ4=; b=J3pjjhsnB72H4xI8WcHvykWevVagEfNnlWDHViBmyu4+ABsCf3USDA1CYukqC7loLH pGeaNlffbRvIsVQGF/SBrtEFgj00yMOt2qsu5L/CtbaTBmCEO9fSAlHAdTmkIZnFyXtY AVHrF9eHOzMbXZmOYg6xoLpPtaKekX6GpxUf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=q9VBrlF9tZUZTasrVvk9yhY+WNpIVvhMmzIitVoLi2ZHMZg2Pfv8yg4BQ4fC5ITWM6 +RptogVSByKKj2a86E5+XCCVEQgqhhujB/RLpY/IJPH6RmaKK8mmko9FNTmIMQi9vw+A +18gXLRy/OBWIz8ufIHsxLSwaIchvsQYcnqzQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.18.11 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:28:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:28:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4451f0d2a7cd72bb Received: by 10.229.227.5 with SMTP id iy5mr2272948qcb.29.1271276927003; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This passes, with 14 +1 votes and no -1 votes. Owen, can you please add this resolution to the agenda for next week's board meeting? Thanks, St.Ack On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Stack wrote: > This passes, with 14 +1 votes and no -1 votes. > > Owen, can you please add this resolution to the agenda for next week's > board meeting? > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Cosmin Lehene wrote= : >> +1 >> >> >> On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Stack wrote: >> >>> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >>> Apache project. >>> >>> I've included below a draft board resolution. =A0It lists all current >>> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management >>> committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >>> >>> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Had= oop PMC? >>> >>> Yours, >>> St.Ack >>> >>> ------------ >>> >>> =A0 X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >>> =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >>> =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to data serialization >>> =A0 =A0 =A0for distribution at no charge to the public. >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", >>> =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is >>> =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >>> =A0 =A0 =A0related to a distributed database; and be it further >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" = be >>> =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >>> =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chai= r >>> =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity >>> =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of >>> =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it furthe= r >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >>> =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project: >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Michael Stack >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jonathan Gray >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Andrew Purtell >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* John-Daniel Cryans >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ryan Rawson >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lars George >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack >>> =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, = to >>> =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >>> =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >>> =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is >>> =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >>> =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in th= e >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache HBase Project; and be it further >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby >>> =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apac= he >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >>> >>> =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the >>> =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> >> > From general-return-1388-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 11:09:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79145 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 11:09:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 11:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 3427 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 11:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3284 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 11:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3271 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 11:09:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:09:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.101.103.66] (HELO krishna.sisl.co.in) (203.101.103.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:09:27 +0000 Received: from kaveri.sisl.co.in (kaveri.sisl.co.in [132.186.192.4]) by krishna.sisl.co.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7AB13CC29 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:45:41 +0530 (IST) Received: from INBLRK77N2MSX.in002.siemens.net (inblrk77n2msx.in002.siemens.net [132.186.221.163]) by kaveri.sisl.co.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273CD1F800E for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:38:34 +0530 (IST) Received: from INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net ([132.186.221.151]) by INBLRK77N2MSX.in002.siemens.net ([132.186.221.163]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:36:14 +0530 From: "Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:36:15 +0530 Subject: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Topic: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Index: Acrci6p/C1PlZUJkSNmnZxaz1u52aQ== Message-ID: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-3.800.1026-17320.004 x-tm-as-result: No--48.794300-8.000000-2 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4INBLRK77M1MSX_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4INBLRK77M1MSX_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have a general query regarding usage of Hadoop with my cloud infrastructu= re. I am trying to achieve scaling up and scaling down in cloud using Hadoo= p. I have set up a cloud infrastructure which creates images consists of OS an= d applications. To access user applications, instance of image has to launc= h. Now I want to make this running or launched instance scalable based on s= ome condition like - a) If no. of users who are accessing the application which is hosting= in cloud (i.e. in instance) are more then it should run one more instance = of image and if no. of users are less then instances should be terminated. b) If CPU usage is more then one more instance of image should run or= if CPU usage is less then it should terminate the instance. Can I achieve these goals using Hadoop? Please guide me and let me know the possible solution. Thanks in advance. -------------------------------------------------------- With best regards, Mohit Goel ________________________________ Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains corporat= e proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notif= y us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments= from your system. Thank You. --_000_2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4INBLRK77M1MSX_-- From general-return-1389-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 12:16:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96386 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 12:16:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 12:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 70241 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 12:16:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70133 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70125 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 12:16:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:16:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:15:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B86B7E0C for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KucwxeAlx4Tu for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75BEBB7E0B for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:31 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271938519.53005@UxXeEOUoo5w/zQtDHi95zg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3FCFIEY010695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:19 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:18 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure References: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3FCFIEY010695 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL wrote: > Hello, > > I have a general query regarding usage of Hadoop with my cloud infrastructure. I am trying to achieve scaling up and scaling down in cloud using Hadoop. > > I have set up a cloud infrastructure which creates images consists of OS and applications. To access user applications, instance of image has to launch. Now I want to make this running or launched instance scalable based on some condition like - > > a) If no. of users who are accessing the application which is hosting in cloud (i.e. in instance) are more then it should run one more instance of image and if no. of users are less then instances should be terminated. > b) If CPU usage is more then one more instance of image should run or if CPU usage is less then it should terminate the instance. > > Can I achieve these goals using Hadoop? > 1. Hadoop on Demand, HOD, does some of this 2. Hadoop on EC2 does some of this 3. I've been doing some of this, too; I have some slides up where I discuss issues http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/new-roles-for-the-cloud One funny for Hadoop is that it likes locality, and it likes machines with TB of physical storage, which doesn't fit in quite as well with the VM-on-demand story. If you look at my slides, you can see that everything expects stable hostnames, reacts to failure by blacklisting, not by killing the VM and creating a new one with the same HDFS volumes mounted. There is room for improvement! From general-return-1390-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 13:09:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17800 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 13:09:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 13:09:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 32544 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:09:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32480 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:09:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32472 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 13:09:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:09:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dan.harvey@mendeley.com designates 209.85.218.211 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:09:39 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so1263242bwz.11 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:09:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.157.131 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:09:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:09:16 +0100 Received: by 10.239.177.212 with SMTP id w20mr13283hbf.126.1271336956752; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBInputFormat number of mappers From: Dan Harvey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636499eb3b274920484463356 --001636499eb3b274920484463356 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Unfortunately the tables I'm importing need application logic to extract the data full which means I can use sqoop, but I will be using that for all the simpler tables. I think I found the problem was with locking the tables in mysql which caused the mappers to run one at a time, so I've re-wrote the code so I'm not locking tables now and that's fixed it from happening completely. It's odd that it didn't always go one at a time though but I guess that might just been to do with how the mysql server was dealing with the queries at different times. Thanks, On 14 April 2010 17:28, Eric Sammer wrote: > If you're performing a simple import of an entire table, sqoop may > make your life easier. It gives you a reasonable command line client > for importing single tables or an entire database (provided there is a > JDBC driver available for it). Sqoop comes with Cloudera's > distribution for Hadoop or you can snag the source from > http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop > > If sqoop isn't appealing for some reason, you can at least take a look > at the code and see what Aaron did under the hood. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Dan Harvey > wrote: > > Right, after sending this e-mail out that started working straight away > with > > no changes... So setting the number of mappers in the code using :- > > > > job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > > > allowed me to specify the number of splits/map tasks. > > > > Which lead me to the second problem I've been getting for awhile. When I > > start a hadoop job using DBInputFormat as the input if I use 5 splits say > > one will start straight away and the others will stay in the initializing > > until it is done then carry on one at a time. This doesn't happen all the > > time though and using the same code and database some will sometimes > start > > in parallel! > > > > I've read this has happened to others before but no clear solution was > found > > then. > > > > Has anyone else had this before or found a way to solve it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > On 13 April 2010 15:46, Dan Harvey wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go > over > >> the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I can't > find > >> a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am > running > >> this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of 2 > map > >> tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be > 10,000,000 > >> then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. > >> > >> I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : > >> > >> job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > >> > >> increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, and > >> also increasing the number of map tasks per node. > >> But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config > file. > >> > >> I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number of > >> rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to > >> change. > >> > >> It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -- > >> Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > >> www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > >> > >> Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > >> Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > > > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > -- Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 --001636499eb3b274920484463356-- From general-return-1391-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 13:23:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21256 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 13:23:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 13:23:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 57885 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:23:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:23:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57729 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 13:23:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:23:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:23:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17B2B7E09 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:22:55 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BWShxJr+axBR for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:22:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092C6B7E03 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:22:54 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271942563.1266@aBbCMr4Q2ITmCmkX7ixagA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3FDMd07012709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:22:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BC7131F.10500@apache.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:22:39 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> In-Reply-To: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3FDMd07012709 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott Carey wrote: > In our case, we package our own rpm and have a few custom patches to Hadoop so removing one jar is a trivial thing to do in the short / medium term. Added my thoughts on CLs to the MAPREDUCE-1700 bugrep. I do my own RPMs too, Ivy driven, tested by installing onto local VMs. There is scope for having a hadoop-redist project that contains everything needed to create RPMs or debs of Hadoop releases, with your own JARs in. volunteers to do this are welcome... From general-return-1392-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 14:30:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41312 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 14:30:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 14:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 90861 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90816 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90808 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 14:30:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:30:44 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3FECFJc006138 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:12:15 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CCD93431A0D5 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:30:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id ioYjae9Ii2EWEXdS for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:30:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3FEUMGq023027 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:30:22 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:30:22 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:30:21 -0500 Subject: RE: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Topic: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Index: AcrclWvyFX02vJhrS5CafCyi5wEZqwAD2gsg Message-ID: References: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Steve,=20 Outside of a EC2 or a commercial site which sells time on a 'cloud', I wo= uld argue against trying to do HOD or build a dynamic cloud for a corpora= te environment. Corporate clouds tend to be static in terms of usage. Meaning that they a= re being built for a task and any changes are not dynamic enough to justi= fy HOD. I sat through a presentation from Sun. A nice guy, but in the end, I and = others thought it was a way to make Sun's hardware (Sorry err I mean Orac= le) relevant in the Hadoop world. Its counter to the concept of developin= g 'white box' commodity hardware. I'm not sold on virtualization, but its just my opinion and not necessari= ly shared by anyone, which means I need to make the following statement: The opinions expressed in this post are mine and mine alone. They do not = reflect the opinions or position of my client, or my employer. Any resemb= lance to a rational coherent thought is pure coincidence.=20 -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:stevel@apache.org]=20 Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:15 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have a general query regarding usage of Hadoop with my cloud infrastr= ucture. I am trying to achieve scaling up and scaling down in cloud using= Hadoop. >=20 > I have set up a cloud infrastructure which creates images consists of O= S and applications. To access user applications, instance of image has to= launch. Now I want to make this running or launched instance scalable ba= sed on some condition like - >=20 > a) If no. of users who are accessing the application which is hos= ting in cloud (i.e. in instance) are more then it should run one more ins= tance of image and if no. of users are less then instances should be term= inated. > b) If CPU usage is more then one more instance of image should ru= n or if CPU usage is less then it should terminate the instance. >=20 > Can I achieve these goals using Hadoop? >=20 1. Hadoop on Demand, HOD, does some of this 2. Hadoop on EC2 does some of this 3. I've been doing some of this, too; I have some slides up where I=20 discuss issues http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/new-roles-for-the-cloud One funny for Hadoop is that it likes locality, and it likes machines=20 with TB of physical storage, which doesn't fit in quite as well with the=20 VM-on-demand story. If you look at my slides, you can see that=20 everything expects stable hostnames, reacts to failure by blacklisting,=20 not by killing the VM and creating a new one with the same HDFS volumes=20 mounted. There is room for improvement! The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1393-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 15:17:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58121 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 15:17:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 15:17:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 70626 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 15:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70593 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 15:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70584 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 15:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of earcam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:17:33 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so913696wwb.35 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:17:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AXqyPS1HzI8Bo8AgPVaRH0AxwmTMs9URgnCLO/ZM0l0=; b=Ntse061lsxUDDCwrRuNsilIHL+JEvs5PFra6P96Jdlj6bL+aCvlPebE3uwbDDR8Zgi FGiUVVx6xuNg/972xdM0WbZVvGUIjNcfSakP0b/Kz0KhFw+bejG1kGhIMb3N6kIf1rVR 8g7+d6wEzEJtEKab1Te+KN2tjdMl2a2QZzf90= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=fEHn5p5908vO9YRFrMu3sTv6LjiwREh4RHhdosxTwmA1ajQ6rQKSbdCH1BEUXIow6G InaxHpmL4B0eUL/iPyfHTFlR1zfjW6oi0j9DwsYMSAnISYIvqmocIptrDeD0L3BE4afE LRYRSejLZT3CYmEIOVhrXZ5vEPgCj4wFZLpXY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.84 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:16:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> From: Caspar MacRae Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:16:49 +0100 Received: by 10.216.89.81 with SMTP id b59mr227765wef.97.1271344630739; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77c7c1a33eb048447fd6e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d77c7c1a33eb048447fd6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I think the problem(s) lies deeper and should be solved at more fundamental level: OSGi (http://www.osgi.org) This has the *classloader*, *modularity* and *distribution* management maturity that IMHO Hadoop clearly needs (from what I know, albeit circa 1.9). It's 10 years old, not headline app-server-tastic, nor flavour of the month http://java.dzone.com/articles/osgi-feast-or-famine - but that's the point, this proven tech. And it'll eventually be present at the lowest levels of Java, eg. project jigsaw: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ which is a precursor to completing JSR-291 A number of people have tried to introduce OSGi to Hadoop but it seems their efforts *may* have been ignored by those in the meritocratic circle of power - this is a real shame, perhaps Jira voting is the way to draw attention to this? You could vote on this ticket that's over 2 years old... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243 OSGi can easily solve the classloading and lifecycle management issues in Hadoop, and brings a lot more besides. Can someone please explain to me the rationale for continuing to ignore such an obvious and elegant solution? Best regards, Caspar On 14 April 2010 19:19, Cooper, Chris wrote: > Scott, > > I think the direction your comments in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1700 is spot on. You > should be looking at J2EE container class loader hierarchies. I've attached > a couple of good links that cover this approach. > > > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0112_deboer/deboer.html > http://www.objectsource.com/j2eechapters/Ch21-ClassLoaders_and_J2EE.htm > > I'm sure Mike and I would both be willing to work with you to contribute a > solution if you're interested. > > Best regards, > > CC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:08 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > My long term suggestions are in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1700. The framework > definitely needs to handle this and not place the burden on users, IMO. But > that won't help you in the short term. > > Whether removing or replacing a Hadoop jar is an acceptable option to you > (or others) in the short term is up to you. Obviously, its not a great long > term solution but if you (or someone else) has to make it work ASAP, it > might be the only option. In our case, we package our own rpm and have a > few custom patches to Hadoop so removing one jar is a trivial thing to do in > the short / medium term. > > -Scott > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution > and you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release and > the removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to get > overwritten. > > > > In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important > and they can be replaced. > > But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its > something you can't easily pop out and replace. > > > > This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understand > what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class. > > > > Thx > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > > > Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it > from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. > > > > For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory > and that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, the > feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump in > JSON format) so I just removed the jar. > > > > -Scott > > > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... > >> > >> How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which > calls other 3rd party classes. > >> > >> An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its > /lib directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a > later release of the same jar. > >> > >> You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is > to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) > >> > >> Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of > methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the > m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. > >> > >> Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? > >> Has anyone done something like this? > >> > >> Thx > >> > >> -Mike > >> > >> Michael Segel > >> Architect, R&D > >> NAVTEQ > >> 425 West Randolph Street > >> Chicago, IL 60606 > >> (T) +1 312-780-3432 > >> (C) +1 312-952-8175 > >> www.navteq.com > >> > >> > >> > >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > --0016e6d77c7c1a33eb048447fd6e-- From general-return-1394-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 16:21:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75817 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 16:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 16:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 66309 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66263 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66255 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 16:21:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:21:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:21:31 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so596133qwh.35 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.92.20 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:20:50 -0700 Received: by 10.229.98.129 with SMTP id q1mr156094qcn.100.1271348470245; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBInputFormat number of mappers To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364274e7f46853048448e1dd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364274e7f46853048448e1dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dan, It's also worth pointing out that DBInputFormat's queries are written in such a way as to make parallelism more likely to hurt than to help. Each mapper submits a query to the database that does a full table scan followed by an ORDER BY clause which has to run database-side. Only after this part of the plan is complete does it select the appropriate output data slice with LIMIT and OFFSET. The moral of this story: If you're using CDH, consider using DataDrivenDBInputFormat instead, which generates queries that actually run in linear time :) (DataDrivenDBIF is also in Apache trunk, so those of you running the straight Apache source will get it in the next release.) Also, if you're using Sqoop, consider just importing the data with --as-sequencefile so that the records are dumped in a way that fully preserves everything, including binary data. Then run a second MapReduce job that runs your extraction code over that input. - Aaron On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Dan Harvey wrote: > Unfortunately the tables I'm importing need application logic to extract > the > data full which means I can use sqoop, but I will be using that for all the > simpler tables. > > I think I found the problem was with locking the tables in mysql which > caused the mappers to run one at a time, so I've re-wrote the code so I'm > not locking tables now and that's fixed it from happening completely. It's > odd that it didn't always go one at a time though but I guess that might > just been to do with how the mysql server was dealing with the queries at > different times. > > Thanks, > > On 14 April 2010 17:28, Eric Sammer wrote: > > > If you're performing a simple import of an entire table, sqoop may > > make your life easier. It gives you a reasonable command line client > > for importing single tables or an entire database (provided there is a > > JDBC driver available for it). Sqoop comes with Cloudera's > > distribution for Hadoop or you can snag the source from > > http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop > > > > If sqoop isn't appealing for some reason, you can at least take a look > > at the code and see what Aaron did under the hood. > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Dan Harvey > > wrote: > > > Right, after sending this e-mail out that started working straight away > > with > > > no changes... So setting the number of mappers in the code using :- > > > > > > job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > > > > > allowed me to specify the number of splits/map tasks. > > > > > > Which lead me to the second problem I've been getting for awhile. When > I > > > start a hadoop job using DBInputFormat as the input if I use 5 splits > say > > > one will start straight away and the others will stay in the > initializing > > > until it is done then carry on one at a time. This doesn't happen all > the > > > time though and using the same code and database some will sometimes > > start > > > in parallel! > > > > > > I've read this has happened to others before but no clear solution was > > found > > > then. > > > > > > Has anyone else had this before or found a way to solve it? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > On 13 April 2010 15:46, Dan Harvey wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go > > over > > >> the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I > can't > > find > > >> a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am > > running > > >> this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of > 2 > > map > > >> tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be > > 10,000,000 > > >> then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. > > >> > > >> I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : > > >> > > >> job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > >> > > >> increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, > and > > >> also increasing the number of map tasks per node. > > >> But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config > > file. > > >> > > >> I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number > of > > >> rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to > > >> change. > > >> > > >> It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > > >> www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > >> > > >> Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > > >> Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > > > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > > > > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > > > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eric Sammer > > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > > twitter: esammer > > data: www.cloudera.com > > > > > > -- > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > --0016364274e7f46853048448e1dd-- From general-return-1395-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 16:28:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77550 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 16:28:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 16:28:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 79519 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:28:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79484 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79476 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 16:28:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:28:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:28:03 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3FG9Ysq010501 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:09:34 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 1AC4D3FD9752 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 0QIUNuVzjXhZNJuI for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3FGRgGq006133 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:42 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:41 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:39 -0500 Subject: RE: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: Acrcrsv1HP7aIy/rQ2KtQAKO5HdmwAACCp0A Message-ID: References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {A9C4C54B-E4F3-4DDC-9DC7-AA1AB08D51BC} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BQ8o CvJN DHmm Dd3U Df3d FqyH GE4I GXqT Gd25 G6Z6 HQEb IEkw Kxwd K6Fd K8DI LIzr;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{A9C4C54B-E4F3-4DDC-9DC7-AA1AB08D51BC};bQBzAGUAZwBlAGwAQABjAGgAaQAuAG4AYQB2AHQAZQBxAC4AYwBvAG0A;Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:27:39 GMT;UgBFADoAIABDAHUAcwB0AG8AbQAgAEMAbABhAHMAcwAgAEwAbwBhAGQAZQByACAAZgBvAHIAIABIAGEAZABvAG8AcAAgAE0ALwBSACAAagBvAGIAcwA/AA== acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Caspar, While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. on the website link: http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license on the download page: http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=nothanks. In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is incompatible with Apache's. That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. >From a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache projects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Caspar MacRae [mailto:earcam@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:17 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Hi all, I think the problem(s) lies deeper and should be solved at more fundamental level: OSGi (http://www.osgi.org) This has the *classloader*, *modularity* and *distribution* management maturity that IMHO Hadoop clearly needs (from what I know, albeit circa 1.9). It's 10 years old, not headline app-server-tastic, nor flavour of the month http://java.dzone.com/articles/osgi-feast-or-famine - but that's the point, this proven tech. And it'll eventually be present at the lowest levels of Java, eg. project jigsaw: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ which is a precursor to completing JSR-291 A number of people have tried to introduce OSGi to Hadoop but it seems their efforts *may* have been ignored by those in the meritocratic circle of power - this is a real shame, perhaps Jira voting is the way to draw attention to this? You could vote on this ticket that's over 2 years old... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243 OSGi can easily solve the classloading and lifecycle management issues in Hadoop, and brings a lot more besides. Can someone please explain to me the rationale for continuing to ignore such an obvious and elegant solution? Best regards, Caspar On 14 April 2010 19:19, Cooper, Chris wrote: > Scott, > > I think the direction your comments in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1700 is spot on. You > should be looking at J2EE container class loader hierarchies. I've attached > a couple of good links that cover this approach. > > > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0112_deboer/deboer.html > http://www.objectsource.com/j2eechapters/Ch21-ClassLoaders_and_J2EE.htm > > I'm sure Mike and I would both be willing to work with you to contribute a > solution if you're interested. > > Best regards, > > CC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:08 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > My long term suggestions are in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1700. The framework > definitely needs to handle this and not place the burden on users, IMO. But > that won't help you in the short term. > > Whether removing or replacing a Hadoop jar is an acceptable option to you > (or others) in the short term is up to you. Obviously, its not a great long > term solution but if you (or someone else) has to make it work ASAP, it > might be the only option. In our case, we package our own rpm and have a > few custom patches to Hadoop so removing one jar is a trivial thing to do in > the short / medium term. > > -Scott > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > While that may work for a quick fix. Its not a good long term solution > and you then run in to a problem where you upgrade your hadoop release and > the removed jar is replaced or if you replace the jar, it possible to get > overwritten. > > > > In this specific instance, the Jackson libraries are not that important > and they can be replaced. > > But that doesn't mean that this issue won't come up again and its > something you can't easily pop out and replace. > > > > This is why I'm looking at custom class loading and trying to understand > what can be accomplished with the methods in the Configuration class. > > > > Thx > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Scott Carey [mailto:scott@richrelevance.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:02 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > > > Depending on what the dependency is, you might be able to just remove it > from hadoop's lib directory on your cluster. > > > > For me, Hadoop's later versions has jackson-1.0.1 in its lib directory > and that breaks usage of Avro in a M/R job among other things. However, the > feature that uses this library is unimportant to me (configuration dump in > JSON format) so I just removed the jar. > > > > -Scott > > > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Ok, here's a bit of a bizarre issue... > >> > >> How do you handle class collisions between Hadoop and your m/r job which > calls other 3rd party classes. > >> > >> An example: Hadoop has an older version of an open source jar in its > /lib directory. You're interfacing with a 3rd party OS tool that uses a > later release of the same jar. > >> > >> You can modify the classpath, and that might work. But the better way is > to create a Custom Class Loader. (Non-trivial) > >> > >> Looking at the Configuration class, it looks like there are a couple of > methods that deal with loading a class in to the configuration so that the > m/r jobs can have access to them on each node. > >> > >> Is this the correct intended use, or am I missing something? > >> Has anyone done something like this? > >> > >> Thx > >> > >> -Mike > >> > >> Michael Segel > >> Architect, R&D > >> NAVTEQ > >> 425 West Randolph Street > >> Chicago, IL 60606 > >> (T) +1 312-780-3432 > >> (C) +1 312-952-8175 > >> www.navteq.com > >> > >> > >> > >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1396-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 16:29:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78165 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 16:29:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 16:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 82806 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82774 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:29:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82766 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 16:29:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:29:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:29:39 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so599596qwh.35 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.92.20 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:28:58 -0700 Received: by 10.229.251.72 with SMTP id mr8mr281407qcb.30.1271348958777; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Different exception handling on corrupt GZip file reading To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b808c12d2b5048448ff43 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b808c12d2b5048448ff43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you ever wonder "why doesn't Hadoop do _REASONABLE_THING_X_", the answer is usually one of: * Somebody made a mistake the first time it got written * Nobody needed quite that corner case before * Maybe people thought that was useful, but didn't know how to fix it, or were too lazy to contribute the code :) In any case, it's just code -- there's likely not an ideological reason tha= t some feature is missing. I'd strongly encourage you to file a ticket on JIR= A and post your code as a patch. Then we can help you clean it up and get it in there for everyone. - Aaron On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Richard Weber wrote: > Maybe this is a =B3dumb=B2 question. In our situation, we process a ton = of log > files all gzipped. Some of those files may be truncated for a a variety = of > reasons resulting in a corrupted gzip file. > > Now using the default TextInputFormat and LineRecordReader, Hadoop will > happily churn along until it hits a corrupted file. Once it hits the fil= e, > it throws exceptions, tries to restart on that file and ultimately fails. > I > originally tried using the Skipped Records feature, but these exceptions > are > happening at the IO level, not record level. > > My solution has been to just make a new SafeTextInputFormat and > SafeLineRecordReader class. The only difference between these classes an= d > the non-safe classes is that it has a try {} block in the nextKeyValue() > fn=B9 > when it does the readLine. If an exception occurs, then the file is clos= ed > out. > > My question really boils down to: Is there a reason this isn=B9t in the > Hadoop > libary to start with? Even if there was a flag to raise the exception, o= r > just let it keep flowing with bad input data. > > It=B9s really more of a gripe that I need to reimplement the above 2 clas= ses > just to have a try catch block, and then to make sure I use these classes > for my input format. > > Thanks > > --Rick > --0016363b808c12d2b5048448ff43-- From general-return-1397-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 16:35:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79317 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 16:35:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 16:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 92882 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:35:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92825 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:35:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92817 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 16:35:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:35:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.246.122.12] (HELO gw2.consol.de) (194.246.122.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:35:46 +0000 Received: from sol1.bb.consol.de (sol1.bb.consol.de [10.250.0.71]) by gw2.consol.de (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3FGZPdQ034856 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:35:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel.may@consol.de) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (gw2.consol.de [10.250.0.12]) by sol1.bb.consol.de (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o3FGZPDS000766 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? From: Marcel May In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:35:25 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9825E237-841F-4B16-A8A8-13B30C2E4051@consol.de> References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate-size: 811 X-purgate-ID: 153102::1271349325-00011504-3277CF8F/0-0/0-0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at gw2.consol.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Caspar, >=20 > While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification License, = Version 1.0. on the website link: = http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license on = the download page: = http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=3Dnothanks. >=20 > In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is = incompatible with Apache's.=20 >=20 > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. >=20 http://felix.apache.org/ > =46rom a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache = projects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? >=20 > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. >=20 > HTH >=20 > -Mike ... Cheers, Marcel= From general-return-1398-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 17:24:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95849 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 17:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 17:24:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 79594 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 17:24:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79493 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 17:24:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79485 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 17:24:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:24:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:24:16 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3FH7118024319 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:07:01 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 5D9B74209597 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:23:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id AybYd6rklvAhW0dO for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:23:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3FHNtjD012657 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:23:55 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:23:54 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:23:54 -0500 Subject: RE: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Topic: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Thread-Index: AcrcubiKcHs0dwFDQDOmKSRJXh/j4gABmVLg Message-ID: References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> <9825E237-841F-4B16-A8A8-13B30C2E4051@consol.de> In-Reply-To: <9825E237-841F-4B16-A8A8-13B30C2E4051@consol.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, so are you using OSGi's code, or just writing your own code to implem= ent a published API/specification? I realize this is getting off topic, so you may just want to e-mail me di= rectly. Thx -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Marcel May [mailto:marcel.may@consol.de]=20 Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:35 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Caspar, >=20 > While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification License, = Version 1.0. on the website link: http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Lice= nsing as well as the license on the download page: http://www.osgi.org/Do= wnload/Release4V42?info=3Dnothanks. >=20 > In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is incompatib= le with Apache's.=20 >=20 > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. >=20 http://felix.apache.org/ > From a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache pro= jects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? >=20 > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. >=20 > HTH >=20 > -Mike =2E.. Cheers, Marcel The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1399-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 17:47:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2274 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 17:47:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 17:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 26616 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 17:47:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26574 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 17:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26566 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 17:47:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:47:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of earcam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:47:40 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1008494wwb.35 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:47:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=d+nrQmyPICQFMJHG2LseNIVqWtU8VcTjq4PfSY9W4Cg=; b=okL6J9F6P1D4eKRnXBhiTdnymutg2iMk/af3OFNAB+UEbPrVxFoS0TqWGXY8uYr2lZ On7FeH2L/DvT/EWQOL0nrrpSNjI388EB3SMKYl3ZdQypssYI1Z1knNnVO2dQ6hfOyaGo +gHa5oycwmtnSrAwjS+AELmxXrzbk5CsRdKxo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Js68JjYC32wlr+2QTxJW6NDj6+mPZLynf8CgNnjkcwXcqwJpg6AEfTwUx9vTNMNdPy iySHsGuA8BUGpmTIIFz2O6PF9DE9bU0l9yvnj7D4j1PDHvb46Ly5d3z9MuMovIzd4h72 zpKl9rr/Me7ySDPjT8+daElQDsmlSxBJ5YrRo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.84 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <42721ED4-DC28-47AF-A456-D3FF321013EF@richrelevance.com> <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E50373D81E@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> <9825E237-841F-4B16-A8A8-13B30C2E4051@consol.de> From: Caspar MacRae Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:40:13 +0100 Received: by 10.216.178.85 with SMTP id e63mr395702wem.156.1271353638519; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b61d00202f404844a1659 --0016e65b61d00202f404844a1659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ServiceMix and ActiveMQ are also using OSGi in their core AFAIK. The way this (these) problems have been solved is more of an afterthought, and regardless is quite simplistic (thinking of classloader isolation in web containers, app servers, and the monolithic WARs produced as a result), however OSGi's approach to modularity provides a truly elegant solution. wrt to the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243, Dave Savage is a nice chap who works for Paremus (an enterprise OSGi provider) I spoke with him at the recent OSGi devcon in London and he did quite a bit of work to get this working for private clients - I'm sure with his expertise it would not be a huge effort to get this rolling again. On 15 April 2010 18:23, Segel, Mike wrote: > Ok, so are you using OSGi's code, or just writing your own code to > implement a published API/specification? > > I realize this is getting off topic, so you may just want to e-mail me > directly. > > Thx > > -Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcel May [mailto:marcel.may@consol.de] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:35 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > Caspar, > > > > While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification License, > Version 1.0. on the website link: > http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license on the > download page: http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=nothanks. > > > > In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is incompatible > with Apache's. > > > > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. > > > > http://felix.apache.org/ > > > From a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache > projects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? > > > > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > ... > > Cheers, > Marcel > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > --0016e65b61d00202f404844a1659-- From general-return-1400-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 07:48:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39093 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 07:48:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 07:48:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 69525 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 07:48:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69358 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 07:48:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69350 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 07:48:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:48:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shendong.liu@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:48:31 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so1040930vws.35 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZeprjAdv7XkgLAzdXrZpnyLM6gX0FkHBD7kaia1Y/Cc=; b=prgOCgyy1dqkXqsBKvuIo12RHdcGQz7msHUQ231BNoheektxpQ6cNPgEK6Hu0pksPK N3vKZrVw7Eb8pCkyEiY0hEz4kuU5HFY7dyxotzzt9jt6DsCdF4dsm3LxQjLxFzaX+1El amd6I+TgqUyP4hRLTNtHN6WfnGu0P1FbhAxuU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=O5D/j0jOZkAiiikXmrHOZz6DmRs9+WOZQZlQZxQ80FE6ZPaYXuVij7ANGsuWPNHDbw pvZ8u3xRwC9bgoEwzHJOP/dQ4V69wv1Htw42Hi1XdC9XsPdsTqzl7nnPxOL0cfOTnhO1 xrCsKsQZxsrLF9X+wRXfrEns26muWdzouCTFY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.95.65 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:48:09 +0800 Received: by 10.220.121.216 with SMTP id i24mr727189vcr.115.1271404089869; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: hello all get a hadoop example From: =?UTF-8?B?5YiY55CG5b+X?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501651a248748048455d503 --00504501651a248748048455d503 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 hello all please give me a hadoop java example . thanks ! Lizhi --00504501651a248748048455d503-- From general-return-1401-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 08:02:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46413 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 08:02:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 08:02:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78249 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 08:02:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78142 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 08:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78134 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 08:02:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:02:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of slimtbourbi@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:02:05 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1058906wyb.35 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1gDNWzv09O3+Dh0NhJNipZKTQn7JQG6ZNDBKCYmgq/k=; b=UUHFYx6zvhMW97D4qQirGuckjB9YRi6mwbrbr6j2rs6E/JsNDZg8H8XIUPuCuZYp6W 1GPoX3GC9Xu0Kka1/hv0zo0kdclfEze1e6/ctkm+55NnO5Ta/JPAzAygglo4lCP9fbc/ Qu7PgLNPbnx8coXdIBTDUGCuZZFXzi1pDQzlE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mVaVylvKkIxHnaMr7npRzz04efQrNxw1Je1s7K1Xm8zVcXATGOs2VRumGa8he/ZT1N c19add3jz2FtR4yjMc08NE0e7AHZaPAiCejFM8cyEhgfMrNkUxFz8Utfl+4yecrR5WUd 4XPxo4DC4Jqrf2yapH2zE5aROsdkefTpO7K1s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.15.200 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:01:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:01:45 +0200 Received: by 10.216.86.148 with SMTP id w20mr1365882wee.112.1271404905337; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hello all get a hadoop example From: slim tebourbi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ef38bf95a004845605ed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7ef38bf95a004845605ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable see this : http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html Slim Tebourbi 2010/4/16 =E5=88=98=E7=90=86=E5=BF=97 > hello all > > please give me a hadoop java example . thanks ! > > Lizhi > --0016e6d7ef38bf95a004845605ed-- From general-return-1402-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 09:05:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69347 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 09:05:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 09:05:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 50348 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 09:05:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49754 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 09:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49744 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 09:05:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:05:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:05:26 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so168318fga.11 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.134.145 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:05:05 +0100 Received: by 10.103.84.21 with SMTP id m21mr869088mul.106.1271408705470; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? From: David Savage To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi there, Many thanks to Caspar for the kind words. Yep we have had Hadoop running in an OSGi environment in the past - though it was for a proof of concept so I've not tracked the current Hadoop trunk to see if that patch still applies. I'm more than happy to try to offer advice if this is something you wish to pursue, though I'd also highly recommend the Felix mailing lists (user@felix.apache.org or dev@felix.apache.org) as excellent sources of OSGi wisdom. Regarding licensing again IANAL but here's the list of projects at apache are using OSGi (that I am aware of) so I'm pretty certain it's compatible... http://felix.apache.org http://aries.apache.org http://sling.apache.org http://tuscany.apache.org http://servicemix.apache.org http://activemq.apache.org http://cxf.apache.org Also I know there's been work to make other library projects such as Apache Commons OSGi compatible. Regarding custom classloaders I'd tend to advise checking if OSGi solves your problems first before trying to role your own - the benefits of using a common classloading model is that your components can then interact with other frameworks - also if you run into complex problems their are a wealth of experts out there who can help you - where as with a custom approach you are on your own. Regards, Dave > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:47, Caspar MacRae wrote: > > ServiceMix and ActiveMQ are also using OSGi in their core AFAIK. > > The way this (these) problems have been solved is more of an afterthought, > and regardless is quite simplistic (thinking of classloader isolation in web > containers, app servers, and the monolithic WARs produced as a result), > however OSGi's approach to modularity provides a truly elegant solution. > > wrt to the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243, Dave > Savage is a nice chap who works for Paremus (an enterprise OSGi provider) I > spoke with him at the recent OSGi devcon in London and he did quite a bit of > work to get this working for private clients - I'm sure with his expertise > it would not be a huge effort to get this rolling again. > > > On 15 April 2010 18:23, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > > Ok, so are you using OSGi's code, or just writing your own code to > > implement a published API/specification? > > > > I realize this is getting off topic, so you may just want to e-mail me > > directly. > > > > Thx > > > > -Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marcel May [mailto:marcel....@consol.de] > > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:35 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > > > Caspar, > > > > > > While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification License, > > Version 1.0. on the website link: > > http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license on the > > download page: http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=nothanks. > > > > > > In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is incompatible > > with Apache's. > > > > > > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. > > > > > > > http://felix.apache.org/ > > > > > From a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache > > projects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? > > > > > > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > -Mike > > ... > > > > Cheers, > > Marcel > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > From general-return-1403-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 09:09:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70121 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 09:09:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 09:09:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 53247 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 09:09:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53215 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 09:09:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53207 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 09:09:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:09:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:09:10 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2202458bwz.11 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:08:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.134.145 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:08:48 +0100 Received: by 10.102.14.25 with SMTP id 25mr890781mun.30.1271408928341; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? From: David Savage To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Savage w= rote: > Hi there, > > Many thanks to Caspar for the kind words. Yep we have had Hadoop > running in an OSGi environment in the past - though it was for a proof > of concept so I've not tracked the current Hadoop trunk to see if that > patch still applies. I'm more than happy to try to offer advice if > this is something you wish to pursue, though I'd also highly recommend > the Felix mailing lists (user@felix.apache.org or > dev@felix.apache.org) as excellent sources of OSGi wisdom. > > Regarding licensing again IANAL but here's the list of projects at > apache are using OSGi (that I am aware of) so I'm pretty certain it's > compatible... > > http://felix.apache.org > http://aries.apache.org Woops: http://incubator.apache.org/aries/ > http://sling.apache.org > http://tuscany.apache.org > http://servicemix.apache.org > http://activemq.apache.org > http://cxf.apache.org > > Also I know there's been work to make other library projects such as > Apache Commons OSGi compatible. > > Regarding custom classloaders I'd tend to advise checking if OSGi > solves your problems first before trying to role your own - the > benefits of using a common classloading model is that your components > can then interact with other frameworks - also if you run into complex > problems their are a wealth of experts out there who can help you - > where as with a custom approach you are on your own. > > Regards, > > Dave > >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:47, Caspar MacRae wrote: >> >> ServiceMix and ActiveMQ are also using OSGi in their core AFAIK. >> >> The way this (these) problems have been solved is more of an afterthough= t, >> and regardless is quite simplistic (thinking of classloader isolation in= web >> containers, app servers, and the monolithic WARs produced as a result), >> however OSGi's approach to modularity provides a truly elegant solution. >> >> wrt to the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243, D= ave >> Savage is a nice chap who works for Paremus (an enterprise OSGi provider= ) I >> spoke with him at the recent OSGi devcon in London and he did quite a bi= t of >> work to get this working for private clients - I'm sure with his experti= se >> it would not be a huge effort to get this rolling again. >> >> > On 15 April 2010 18:23, Segel, Mike wrote: >> > >> > Ok, so are you using OSGi's code, or just writing your own code to >> > implement a published API/specification? >> > >> > I realize this is getting off topic, so you may just want to e-mail me >> > directly. >> > >> > Thx >> > >> > -Mike >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Marcel May [mailto:marcel....@consol.de] >> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:35 AM >> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? >> > >> > >> > On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: >> > >> > > Caspar, >> > > >> > > While IANAL, I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification Licens= e, >> > Version 1.0. on the website link: >> > http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license on= the >> > download page: http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=3Dnothank= s. >> > > >> > > In a nutshell, OSGi's Specification License, Version 1.0. is incompa= tible >> > with Apache's. >> > > >> > > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. >> > > >> > >> > http://felix.apache.org/ >> > >> > > From a more practical issue, this problem is solved in other Apache >> > projects, so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat? >> > > >> > > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. >> > > >> > > HTH >> > > >> > > -Mike >> > ... >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Marcel >> > >> > >> > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL an= d is >> > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. =A0If you a= re not >> > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination= , >> > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is >> > strictly prohibited. =A0If you have received this communication in err= or, >> > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and a= ny >> > copy of it from your computer or paper files. >> > > From general-return-1404-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 10:32:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85999 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 10:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 10:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 40486 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 10:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40452 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 10:32:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40444 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 10:32:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:32:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:32:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D558B7EB7 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:32:13 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id naIcnSDYHBp5 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:32:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B7FB7EA9 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:32:01 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1272018709.48166@qmmc7VlU9sjszqMlQDCxog Received: from [16.24.242.20] ([16.24.242.20]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3GAVlR3009981 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:31:48 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BC83C8E.4030704@apache.org> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:31:42 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRA snafu? References: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <1CCD1C49-71A3-46B2-878E-74781E0815EE@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3GAVlR3009981 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 13/04/2010 17:24, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I can no longer grant permission to Apache for my patches on JIRA. > Anyone else? > > thanks, > Arun the other troublespot right now is that some people (myself included) cant take ownership of issues, mark things as closed, etc. Reported to the infra team, but as you can imagine, they are fairly busy right now From general-return-1405-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 11:31:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97209 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 11:31:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 11:31:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 12212 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 11:31:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11976 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 11:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11968 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 11:31:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:31:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.16] (HELO col0-omc1-s6.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:31:36 +0000 Received: from COL117-W57 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s6.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:31:15 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_c216e6b3-391a-4e30-bff0-6d4b78237654_" X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.34] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:31:15 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2010 11:31:15.0943 (UTC) FILETIME=[53646770:01CADD58] --_c216e6b3-391a-4e30-bff0-6d4b78237654_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David=2C The only reason to roll your own is if you do this in a specific map reduce= job and the functionality doesn't already exist. And no=2C I'm not suggesting that. As to OSGi for a solution=2C sure=2C that would work. I think Chris was loo= king at something like Tomcat because they have also had to deal with this = issue=2C so a solution exists. I wasn't aware of the OSGi implementations s= o that too is an option. The reason I started to look at this in terms of the Configuration class is= that it looks like some of the pieces are already in place and I was wonde= ring if the class already has enough of a solution in place to allow for cu= stom class loads? Thanks to everyone! -Mike > Date: Fri=2C 16 Apr 2010 10:05:05 +0100 > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > From: david.savage@paremus.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > Hi there=2C >=20 > Many thanks to Caspar for the kind words. Yep we have had Hadoop > running in an OSGi environment in the past - though it was for a proof > of concept so I've not tracked the current Hadoop trunk to see if that > patch still applies. I'm more than happy to try to offer advice if > this is something you wish to pursue=2C though I'd also highly recommend > the Felix mailing lists (user@felix.apache.org or > dev@felix.apache.org) as excellent sources of OSGi wisdom. >=20 > Regarding licensing again IANAL but here's the list of projects at > apache are using OSGi (that I am aware of) so I'm pretty certain it's > compatible... >=20 > http://felix.apache.org > http://aries.apache.org > http://sling.apache.org > http://tuscany.apache.org > http://servicemix.apache.org > http://activemq.apache.org > http://cxf.apache.org >=20 > Also I know there's been work to make other library projects such as > Apache Commons OSGi compatible. >=20 > Regarding custom classloaders I'd tend to advise checking if OSGi > solves your problems first before trying to role your own - the > benefits of using a common classloading model is that your components > can then interact with other frameworks - also if you run into complex > problems their are a wealth of experts out there who can help you - > where as with a custom approach you are on your own. >=20 > Regards=2C >=20 > Dave >=20 > > On Thu=2C 15 Apr 2010 10:47=2C Caspar MacRae wrote: > > > > ServiceMix and ActiveMQ are also using OSGi in their core AFAIK. > > > > The way this (these) problems have been solved is more of an afterthoug= ht=2C > > and regardless is quite simplistic (thinking of classloader isolation i= n web > > containers=2C app servers=2C and the monolithic WARs produced as a resu= lt)=2C > > however OSGi's approach to modularity provides a truly elegant solution= . > > > > wrt to the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-243= =2C Dave > > Savage is a nice chap who works for Paremus (an enterprise OSGi provide= r) I > > spoke with him at the recent OSGi devcon in London and he did quite a b= it of > > work to get this working for private clients - I'm sure with his expert= ise > > it would not be a huge effort to get this rolling again. > > > > > On 15 April 2010 18:23=2C Segel=2C Mike wrote: > > > > > > Ok=2C so are you using OSGi's code=2C or just writing your own code t= o > > > implement a published API/specification? > > > > > > I realize this is getting off topic=2C so you may just want to e-mail= me > > > directly. > > > > > > Thx > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Marcel May [mailto:marcel....@consol.de] > > > Sent: Thursday=2C April 15=2C 2010 11:35 AM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Custom Class Loader for Hadoop M/R jobs? > > > > > > > > > On Apr 15=2C 2010=2C at 6:27 PM=2C Segel=2C Mike wrote: > > > > > > > Caspar=2C > > > > > > > > While IANAL=2C I did a first blush read of OSGi's Specification Lic= ense=2C > > > Version 1.0. on the website link: > > > http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/Licensing as well as the license o= n the > > > download page: http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release4V42?info=3Dnothan= ks. > > > > > > > > In a nutshell=2C OSGi's Specification License=2C Version 1.0. is in= compatible > > > with Apache's. > > > > > > > > That alone can explain why Apache projects won't touch OSGi. > > > > > > > > > > http://felix.apache.org/ > > > > > > > From a more practical issue=2C this problem is solved in other Apac= he > > > projects=2C so why not borrow from another Apache project like Tomcat= ? > > > > > > > > Does that make sense? It appears OSGi is a non-starter. > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > ... > > > > > > Cheers=2C > > > Marcel > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL a= nd is > > > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you ar= e not > > > the intended recipient=2C you are hereby notified that any disseminat= ion=2C > > > distribution=2C or copying of this communication=2C or any of its con= tents=2C is > > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in erro= r=2C > > > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any > > > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > =20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search=2C chat and e-mail from your inbox= . http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3= --_c216e6b3-391a-4e30-bff0-6d4b78237654_-- From general-return-1406-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 15:46:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4928 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 15:46:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 15:46:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 33616 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 15:46:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33555 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 15:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33547 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 15:46:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:46:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shendong.liu@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:46:11 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so1234335vws.35 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HNkFduYh691Ypcmn4/qikWHcbN5ndft3pcAEuSWwdgE=; b=KNfoFwiORS2FRRvwBiLi93b2lOEIyrG3EdrqcId52zTcyqbnEEJ3LmyUYTHqzHlY4K Wb3fGc6XzaWBuAzc86yXugXL58j5GqbIWz3TO59REtiru1WoL2rEpIbkK18ApMJUyQPP 2X558A9JPvUjAioEu6bU5S7R+jImGgIW+sWN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Tlj3P4wrkgZrm2pj4rLOKui46pndrCscBAKu3Mb5J+Xenz5HNLMtCe3+eNUR4DQ6Wd jWptkZ4BZ6+xxEyODuyuDKv2JkNfPbYiW+t4hKEBQas5MdrzoM9W98jP1eMMxjJnf6DU yii3y8qdK3E3tW6PC3UjPgLmg0lUNEhwRr1TY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.95.65 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:45:50 +0800 Received: by 10.220.107.71 with SMTP id a7mr1057107vcp.231.1271432750090; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hello all get a hadoop example From: steven liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9057616ccb6d04845c81b6 --00c09f9057616ccb6d04845c81b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thanks Slim Tebourbi 2010/4/16 slim tebourbi > see this : > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html > > Slim > Tebourbi > > 2010/4/16 =E5=88=98=E7=90=86=E5=BF=97 > > > hello all > > > > please give me a hadoop java example . thanks ! > > > > Lizhi > > > --00c09f9057616ccb6d04845c81b6-- From general-return-1407-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:40:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57422 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:40:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 40287 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40232 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40224 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:40:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:40:34 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1675683wwb.35 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=19l6a5dyLPcj9vYnA8RN3VcrB+J2g6jfLgBjtWV/u/0=; b=OBU2UanaNG6qVYMN9jwr7FddNcGZbqWR3dEFPsHlrH1rur+V48LP0vtLxA1R8vhvq+ DqlxrpP2ptcgOrUioXKHQvAP/SO2/hG+R3sEnbt39axpA7LgqzLDTpcHTDEwuwlIn0ky EuC6j3LnkLsb1QFALGG466w3FcNvNITHUmEZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y5PMDWHOY3gO6DTwGF0dvwNak3e3xvTpZZ1Jnbkv1d6zc7sOnmM8q5/A/5FUkZg2q6 MLS8PPe6LwnRacwsidjK070gV4u6nxurVdcFG6NWvRFmPPQN0Tcbdm2CqPgMdAcqjYtz VXWlKRr4osn9HFoQuJL4z1Pln4Oej3GvGtJrA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.36.76 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:40:14 -0400 Received: by 10.216.182.142 with SMTP id o14mr2437310wem.137.1271443214337; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hello all get a hadoop example From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That documentation is SO out of date. On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:01 AM, slim tebourbi wrot= e: > see this : > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html > > Slim > Tebourbi > > 2010/4/16 =E5=88=98=E7=90=86=E5=BF=97 > >> hello all >> >> please give me a hadoop java example . thanks ! >> >> Lizhi >> > From general-return-1408-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 17 22:05:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35461 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 22:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 99788 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99571 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38557 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 03:19:02 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cryptcom@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=iSHXF2FT8RZ+eEZw3JUJtBeJxkuRcr9J3hyutAiHmjY=; b=CyH4nZJQcqct0Vb8Ipy35fh9pjsaxqFpAMySX2yAsraT5IRfunyh0hLpg1pPN1Sp8z /17/alUi4MXf8PrIpyvxQ+Etn8S6/doYdRPv0XvVOoOggG7NAZw81O93ZLpGvAL9lfhQ cZ7i+/aYo7b30jKSMTXOlbqUbG9sbnJk8YUmQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=U+V9amvwJWE+HcM8TPtuXJrAZbOqICFXVYzfkyKN5djcri7LJhaUr6eIhZqLSzcMTV ayaZ3UKA6lLwBSL5Af7SkBEaDHPB/GqWHEr5rTorWi3BwBJehaJeJVsFiFupm9Ng6uUG VymsoyTEXosiXG2Zq45Lyysl20Sa03umFzX8E= References: Message-Id: <747595C5-5D91-445B-B2FD-32B5D944BCD6@gmail.com> From: Joe Stein To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:18:25 -0400 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is a good idea because the segment is already fragmented and honestly hbase is often a second thought, and should not be, because it is seen as tightly coupled. I find hbase and Cassandra the leaders of the pack and welcome hbase TLP to knock out dumb others and hopefully tighten up the options for newbies (how is that for a run on sentance). Just my $.029843366347 cents on it since you asked. /* Joe Stein http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc */ On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:52 PM, John Martyniak wrote: > Can somebody tell me why this is a good idea? > > Isn't HBase tightly coupled with Hadoop/HDFS. Isn't that the > benefit of it. > > -John > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Stack wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level >> Apache project. >> >> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current >> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >> >> Yours, >> St.Ack >> >> ------------ >> >> X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to data serialization >> for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a distributed database; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache HBase Project: >> >> * Michael Stack >> * Jonathan Gray >> * Andrew Purtell >> * John-Daniel Cryans >> * Ryan Rawson >> * Lars George >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache HBase Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-1409-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 17 22:05:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35543 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 22:05:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 1242 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1198 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54007 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clehene@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender) From: Cosmin Lehene To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:25:35 +0100 Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] HBase as TLP? Thread-Index: AcrbPxnu9nsZy1KfTFmtKyxZnshv0g== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1 On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Stack wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level > Apache project. >=20 > I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current > active HBase committers as initial members of the project management > committee (PMC) and myself, Michael Stack, as the initial chair. >=20 > Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoo= p PMC? >=20 > Yours, > St.Ack >=20 > ------------ >=20 > X. Establish the Apache HBase Project >=20 > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to data serialization > for distribution at no charge to the public. >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache HBase Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to a distributed database; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache HBase" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache HBase Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache HBase Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache HBase Project: >=20 > * Michael Stack > * Jonathan Gray > * Andrew Purtell > * John-Daniel Cryans > * Ryan Rawson > * Lars George >=20 > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael Stack > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HBase, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache HBase PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache HBase Project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that the Apache HBase Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project; and be it further >=20 > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop HBase sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1410-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 17 22:06:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35642 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 22:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2404 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2206 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72881 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 04:35:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-AuditID: cb5bdd58-b7bf7ae000006db3-c0-4bc546036190 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CADB8B.E08FE5E0" Subject: how to split data Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:05:14 +0530 Message-ID: <1E766DC73403B144A7FF3C3A3888D0C7143229@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: how to split data Thread-Index: Acrbi+B85RcIu5uYSc2MHIqkbqfjQg== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2010 04:35:14.0992 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0AE0B00:01CADB8B] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CADB8B.E08FE5E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hi i am studying about hadoop and sending a mail to know how to split data. if= the block size is 64MB and i am supposed to hadle 129MB. How will it split?= (64,64,1) or (64,64,64) . i think first one is right. but i want to get inf= ormaiton more detail. so if possible, just let me know it. Regards sungeun lee Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. =0A= =0A= The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may= contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not= the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this= e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this= message and any attachments. =0A= =0A= WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should= check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The compa= ny accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by th= is email. =0A= =0A= www.wipro.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01CADB8B.E08FE5E0-- From general-return-1411-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 17 22:06:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35722 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 22:06:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 3447 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3235 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:06:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76787 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 07:49:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rectech@126.com designates 123.125.50.112 as permitted sender) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:48:29 +0800 Subject: strange error with node name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: rec Organization: recfloyd Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux) X-CM-TRANSID:j9KowLAb0QPNxMZLQUYJAA--.1082S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUYD73DUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: xuhf3vlfk6ij2wof0z/1tbiDwyzsUnsSpgPgQAAs4 Hi guys, I've got a strange error when doing my first try of hadoop 0.20. To try the clustering, I've got 3 machines with the same OS, Ubuntu 9.10. One of them for master and the other 2 for slave. After starting, I turn to the page http://MASTER_DOMAIN:50070/dfsnodelist.jsp?whatNodes=LIVE. I got 2 live nodes, whose names are both "localhost", but not the domain names of the 2 slaves. I did added the 2 slaves' domain name to /etc/hosts file. There's no error in log files, but where did I go wrong ? Thanks advanced. Rec From general-return-1412-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 17 22:44:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51686 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2010 22:44:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 22:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21074 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:44:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21021 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2010 22:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21013 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2010 22:44:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:44:01 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3HMPQxW029509 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:25:26 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7028B2EC3E3A for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:43:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id QmAtQxRO0HeqXBqA for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:43:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3HMhdGq001624 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:43:39 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:43:37 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:43:37 -0500 Subject: RE: how to split data Thread-Topic: how to split data Thread-Index: Acrbi+B85RcIu5uYSc2MHIqkbqfjQgC8feiQ Message-ID: References: <1E766DC73403B144A7FF3C3A3888D0C7143229@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> In-Reply-To: <1E766DC73403B144A7FF3C3A3888D0C7143229@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Sungeun, Its really the second one. Files are split in to blocks depending on a co= nfiguration parameter. By default its 64MB. Using your example, the split= s are 64,64,1 however the 1 MB is within an allocated block of size 64MB.= =20 HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: lee.sungeun@wipro.com [mailto:lee.sungeun@wipro.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:35 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: how to split data Hi i am studying about hadoop and sending a mail to know how to split data. = if the block size is 64MB and i am supposed to hadle 129MB. How will it s= plit? (64,64,1) or (64,64,64) . i think first one is right. but i want to= get informaiton more detail. so if possible, just let me know it. =20 Regards sungeun lee Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.=20 The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments = to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) an= d may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you= are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute o= r copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all = copies of this message and any attachments.=20 WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient sho= uld check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The= company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmit= ted by this email.=20 www.wipro.com The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1413-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 02:38:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27333 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 02:38:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 02:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 88753 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 02:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88584 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 02:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88576 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 02:38:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:38:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:38:17 +0000 Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so2635615pvg.35 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:37:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vvNFx++LjOUzu95PkK0H815fq9J8NA1cETumnnP0x1w=; b=PVHPcYOyip8VJuFp71VZ+6zyS2UG48wFYXYItQUYjBBm9LfqPlQy0pnTKVegZCOppI km5HWJMMeZUQIRUpn5ynqaEAisvGnGjQb/t6cgddPNYYwAOQ5vzu3KPpvNHTBYrUFOPo cXxUCN97LTxZIrh12QFh7mxmssD5qIjbVfsnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=i6tcUV2t/7BnwDN/aaxBF9/qU1DHVg1Z2iwEGQmWtS+pwvwqVdqPl7EFeKIKuFOzY8 5prA7Y7YFleGLaNWAL6deU3NjbzQZthWUYrAgNc62tAP0mUtJdHo8fMU6sTAnPSeupNJ 8+tcA9RJzNM9XKGeZDBCFZUbiTeB+WP0pimP4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.133.15 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:37:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:07:56 +0530 Received: by 10.143.21.2 with SMTP id y2mr1784134wfi.239.1271644676838; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBInputFormat number of mappers From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cbe63e576304848dd9e5 --00504502cbe63e576304848dd9e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dan, You can also check http://code.google.com/p/hiho/ for importing query based data using bound range queries. Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Dan Harvey wrote: > Unfortunately the tables I'm importing need application logic to extract > the > data full which means I can use sqoop, but I will be using that for all the > simpler tables. > > I think I found the problem was with locking the tables in mysql which > caused the mappers to run one at a time, so I've re-wrote the code so I'm > not locking tables now and that's fixed it from happening completely. It's > odd that it didn't always go one at a time though but I guess that might > just been to do with how the mysql server was dealing with the queries at > different times. > > Thanks, > > On 14 April 2010 17:28, Eric Sammer wrote: > > > If you're performing a simple import of an entire table, sqoop may > > make your life easier. It gives you a reasonable command line client > > for importing single tables or an entire database (provided there is a > > JDBC driver available for it). Sqoop comes with Cloudera's > > distribution for Hadoop or you can snag the source from > > http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop > > > > If sqoop isn't appealing for some reason, you can at least take a look > > at the code and see what Aaron did under the hood. > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Dan Harvey > > wrote: > > > Right, after sending this e-mail out that started working straight away > > with > > > no changes... So setting the number of mappers in the code using :- > > > > > > job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > > > > > allowed me to specify the number of splits/map tasks. > > > > > > Which lead me to the second problem I've been getting for awhile. When > I > > > start a hadoop job using DBInputFormat as the input if I use 5 splits > say > > > one will start straight away and the others will stay in the > initializing > > > until it is done then carry on one at a time. This doesn't happen all > the > > > time though and using the same code and database some will sometimes > > start > > > in parallel! > > > > > > I've read this has happened to others before but no clear solution was > > found > > > then. > > > > > > Has anyone else had this before or found a way to solve it? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > On 13 April 2010 15:46, Dan Harvey wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm importing data from a mysql database using the DBInputFormat to go > > over > > >> the rows in a table and put them into HBase with the mapper but I > can't > > find > > >> a way to increase the number of maps it splits the input into. I am > > running > > >> this on a cluster where we have 5 nodes and each node has a maximum of > 2 > > map > > >> tasks. So for example if I set the number of rows to import to be > > 10,000,000 > > >> then there will only 2 maps tasks and use only two of the nodes.. > > >> > > >> I've tried increasing the limit manually in the code with : > > >> > > >> job.getConfiguration().setInt("mapred.map.tasks", 4); > > >> > > >> increasing the number on the command line to set the same property, > and > > >> also increasing the number of map tasks per node. > > >> But in all cases mapred.map.tasks is set to 2 in the job xml config > > file. > > >> > > >> I've had a look at the code and DBInputFormat splits the total number > of > > >> rows over mapred.map.tasks, so I'm guessing it's just getting that to > > >> change. > > >> > > >> It would be great if anyone has any ideas what's going on? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > > >> www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > >> > > >> Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > > >> Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > > > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > > > > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > > > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eric Sammer > > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > > twitter: esammer > > data: www.cloudera.com > > > > > > -- > Dan Harvey | Datamining Engineer > www.mendeley.com/profiles/dan-harvey > > Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com > Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015 > --00504502cbe63e576304848dd9e5-- From general-return-1414-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 08:23:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14359 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 08:23:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 08:23:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 99000 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 08:23:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98649 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 08:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98641 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 08:23:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.101.103.66] (HELO krishna.sisl.co.in) (203.101.103.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:23:04 +0000 Received: from kaveri.sisl.co.in (kaveri.sisl.co.in [132.186.192.4]) by krishna.sisl.co.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA75713CC1F for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:59:56 +0530 (IST) Received: from INBLRK77N3MSX.in002.siemens.net (inblrk77n3msx.in002.siemens.net [132.186.221.164]) by kaveri.sisl.co.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E821F800A for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:52:09 +0530 (IST) Received: from INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net ([132.186.221.151]) by INBLRK77N3MSX.in002.siemens.net ([132.186.221.164]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:50:48 +0530 From: "Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:50:47 +0530 Subject: RE: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Topic: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Thread-Index: AcrclX8Y1mUOnKA6QuGrrzYk20mRSgDAt6ag Message-ID: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A177803B07@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> References: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-3.800.1026-17328.005 x-tm-as-result: No--39.204700-8.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello, Thanks for the reply. It means that we can achieve scaling up and provisioning using Hadoop. Now = the question is How to do this? Can I get source code to achieve the same? Or is there any service availabl= e using which we can implement provisioning and scaling up feature in our c= loud infrastructure? -------------------------------------------------------- With best regards, Mohit Goel -----Original Message----- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:stevel@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:45 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL wrote: > Hello, > > I have a general query regarding usage of Hadoop with my cloud infrastruc= ture. I am trying to achieve scaling up and scaling down in cloud using Had= oop. > > I have set up a cloud infrastructure which creates images consists of OS = and applications. To access user applications, instance of image has to lau= nch. Now I want to make this running or launched instance scalable based on= some condition like - > > a) If no. of users who are accessing the application which is hosti= ng in cloud (i.e. in instance) are more then it should run one more instanc= e of image and if no. of users are less then instances should be terminated= . > b) If CPU usage is more then one more instance of image should run = or if CPU usage is less then it should terminate the instance. > > Can I achieve these goals using Hadoop? > 1. Hadoop on Demand, HOD, does some of this 2. Hadoop on EC2 does some of this 3. I've been doing some of this, too; I have some slides up where I discuss issues http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/new-roles-for-the-cloud One funny for Hadoop is that it likes locality, and it likes machines with TB of physical storage, which doesn't fit in quite as well with the VM-on-demand story. If you look at my slides, you can see that everything expects stable hostnames, reacts to failure by blacklisting, not by killing the VM and creating a new one with the same HDFS volumes mounted. There is room for improvement! Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains corporat= e proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notif= y us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments= from your system. Thank You. From general-return-1415-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 10:52:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89294 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 10:52:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 10:52:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 78915 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 10:52:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78555 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 10:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78547 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 10:52:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:52:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:52:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1CEB7D8E for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:47 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VcJbGpiJZfSA for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3B6B7D85 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:36 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1272279085.23819@JyvlwSEKFaB7Tbx7ktz+iQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3JApNSx011312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BCC35AC.3030507@apache.org> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:51:24 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Hadoop and cloud infrastructure References: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A1777C16F4@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> <4BC70356.5050700@apache.org> <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A177803B07@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <2658E54B540D284981EA57E6A549EA70A177803B07@INBLRK77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3JApNSx011312 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Goel, Mohit IN BLR SISL wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the reply. > > It means that we can achieve scaling up and provisioning using Hadoop. Now the question is How to do this? > > Can I get source code to achieve the same? Or is there any service available using which we can implement provisioning and scaling up feature in our cloud infrastructure? That depends on your infrastructure. HOD is probably your best starting point, if you have something running eucalyptus there are more options From general-return-1416-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 13:33:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81670 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 13:33:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 13:33:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 7775 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 13:33:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7691 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 13:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7683 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 13:33:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mikelin36@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:33:32 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so2578763gyf.35 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bnnCBhRR7aH+ZldW82BhOWEm57pr2nFMSDggvyiN1Ls=; b=PTqMplJNSVhevKePMFABjv9fcoWrLe9RBFt5AIbsLJg5XnYUm+MQyg/w2mTVeBJ91r 0PyCHuP6MhBcQ8nBMpSctn+lpc65xDPPNeqUikn0/BLdo2FsWiUvgvTR2HnBRFpBt77r dU8rMOxkzEYhxXlxaYMXqfWC0F+UpLNewOLek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=h1614uCsH8yFua9FXzU3qRhsWuGRXyMDg7Axw9QSxLyDa24+eccRsXA1Uhmn1D7hiG 4zHQjjOxvH2uZMno1r0JjF2gmuuKUKmB8yGP9WTndx2KguJPNNa/NpMrmr9bmR8oo/gk m0ehmHKjzr4YrBeXHkilDFeAQdV9s5Xw0pAwY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.242.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:33:09 +0800 Received: by 10.100.56.30 with SMTP id e30mr13458594ana.38.1271683990213; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Error while random accessing Lzo file in Hadoop From: Yuting Lin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a6428185fd04849700c7 --001485f9a6428185fd04849700c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all I try to random access the sequence file which is blocked compressed by "com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec.class". However, when the program contains more than one seek(offset) followed by next(), it leads unexpected error in Java (The offset passed to seek() is the beginning position of the block). If the sequence file is compressed by "org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.class", there is no such error. My Linux is 32-bit 2.6.27, Lzo version is 0.1.0. OS, Java version is 1.6.0. The log of error is shown below. Is there any approach to random access the lzo-file in Hadoop? Thanks. - Regards Yuting --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- OS:lenny/sid uname:Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 13:01:41 UTC 2009 i686 libc:glibc 2.8.90 NPTL 2.8.90 rlimit: STACK 8192k, CORE 0k, NPROC 26607, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity load average:0.03 0.11 0.14 CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 6 model 15 stepping 11, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, ssse3 Memory: 4k page, physical 3369768k(1217868k free), swap 1140572k(1140572k free) vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (11.0-b15) for linux-x86 JRE (1.6.0_10-b33), built on Sep 26 2008 01:05:20 by "java_re" with gcc 3.2.1-7a (J2SE release) --------------- T H R E A D --------------- Current thread (0x09542000): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, id=22346, stack(0xb7e6e000,0xb7ebf000)] siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR), si_addr=0x09a82000 Registers: EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x7181cff4, ECX=0x01048f83, EDX=0x00074de0 ESP=0xb7ebd6c4, EBP=0xb7ebd6f8, ESI=0x09a0c7b5, EDI=0x09a0d21b EIP=0x716d644b, CR2=0x09a82000, EFLAGS=0x00210212 Top of Stack: (sp=0xb7ebd6c4) 0xb7ebd6c4: 00fd419e 00000000 01048f82 09a0d21f 0xb7ebd6d4: 09a0c7b9 099fc003 09a0d21b 099fc21e 0xb7ebd6e4: 095c644c 00000022 7181cff4 09542114 0xb7ebd6f4: 09542000 b7ebd7f8 7181a994 099fc000 0xb7ebd704: 00000003 09a0d000 b7ebd764 00000000 0xb7ebd714: 00000000 b4dec439 716d6200 099fc002 0xb7ebd724: 00000000 ae190570 b7ebd72c 72a18ae0 0xb7ebd734: b7ebd848 00000003 00010000 72a18af0 Instructions: (pc=0x716d644b) 0x716d643b: 26 00 00 00 00 8b 44 16 04 8b 7d e4 83 6d cc 04 0x716d644b: 89 44 17 04 83 c2 04 83 7d cc 03 77 e8 8d 41 fb ... --001485f9a6428185fd04849700c7-- From general-return-1417-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 17:56:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28936 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 17:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 17:56:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 12607 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:56:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:56:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12514 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 17:56:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:56:43 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so2689210gyf.35 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:56:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ad9HKP44qKGwbmh9rOBgOxE7MqdxKpq3YsIIDHJAj1s=; b=X2G5klZL3tMvwI0kYOqtWs2Vd8OEmobetTw3usm+/FCjGrAJD6o3A8vB21qGvu29hC tQiSK4o8J/dJxs2pWKYL0N0VNX8nkC7fa3Ro7iPtBN3HQJLg/qgR1jfumOzJSXsTA2Af Rerendh1qX0JBRMA4aCbPJ79NhLSXFUyot3s8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=BZoKwYS/KLkJmjR66uVkPKslWEb1KWdFIH936G6uoO25lrjjFnWEfqsxiDlUnbfib9 c7rc1w4yOxBbiquR8b+UCLiSUtHqJzA2CnQLNEQzAr++fjHJoli9cnxfi2BkHnSs9vj1 nb44CghNPzs2CBcM7Y+pd1Ivj6is+Lw/DVn38= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.165.5 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:56:19 -0500 Received: by 10.101.131.4 with SMTP id i4mr7799917ann.174.1271699779231; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92a3f9a5c7504849aadee --001636c92a3f9a5c7504849aadee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack a user group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot me an email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so facilities shouldn't be an issue. Thanks. Jonathan Seidman --001636c92a3f9a5c7504849aadee-- From general-return-1418-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 17:57:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29293 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 17:57:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 17:57:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 15677 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:57:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15621 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15613 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 17:57:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:57:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:57:50 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3JHdACC027558 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:39:10 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 1D8E23FE4355 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:57:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id nZCshzxoLQvc8jCA for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:57:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3JHvSGq009700 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:57:29 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:57:28 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:57:27 -0500 Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group Thread-Index: Acrf6bGH1M1Ag/exTSSC5iEHKfzluQAAAm5g Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sure, Please contact me. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Seidman [mailto:jonathan.seidman@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:56 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack a us= er group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot me a= n email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so facilities shouldn't be an issue. Thanks. Jonathan Seidman The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1419-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 18:22:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36530 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 18:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 18:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 45727 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 18:22:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45665 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 18:22:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45657 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 18:22:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:22:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kapilmistry@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:22:17 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so992265ewy.31 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/A069xzmZ4y0TRMg0su0DA//QJa3JxtwyE8w5zV0t8c=; b=LjYBMRwYaEwJ3hufknzM9/2nIDRrz19aCDq5cjzryOHhYrOgQ3ti91YPQy517a34Kq S8djk4/um2rzHq1hOD8Ge7eYvEGBUIZUv47CC6ExSl6OxYM1dvaI9yY2QvIHQRxHChEY Ge7CYV7GJnYuf2d9U1nideOPDVI+jo6Y3zUoo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=BBhDyM0kftN4qcFuAE+UD7fQXNIQaQFfT5B1cZn2DoAt3X2Ip4dhdYNmL1202kJ78I 4/xGeZzKdmsNU71TtlugPwYCv0UNUsGrN5UXjP0v0hYAP97ie4TL5gWOCxzdrH5TEqiQ +V6vpBb7IuEQyn8zRk0Dx//49zzXwHiAs6ajk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.1 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Kapil Mistry Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:21:34 -0500 Received: by 10.213.2.79 with SMTP id 15mr2795392ebi.41.1271701316098; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747681834ee6f04849b09ce X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151747681834ee6f04849b09ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would be interested as well. Kapil On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Seidman < jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack a user > group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud > computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot me an > email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so > facilities shouldn't be an issue. > > Thanks. > > Jonathan Seidman > --00151747681834ee6f04849b09ce-- From general-return-1420-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 19:06:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56065 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 19:06:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 19:06:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6975 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:06:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6907 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:06:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6899 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 19:06:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:06:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:06:45 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-153-90.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c140.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.140]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3JJ5ope062301 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=HXuTkKt2LJ7eFOKt3syCHoXmYoROX4QXgQ/nEGFaIkYpQoGcMJpdJOwMT2rA/JGC Message-Id: <8C2892F2-D5B2-4F86-A0E2-F0493CC1BFD6@yahoo-inc.com> From: Hong Tang To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Error while random accessing Lzo file in Hadoop Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:05:50 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yuting, Could you please report the bug at http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/issues/list? Also it would be helpful if you could share your test program and sample data. -Hong On Apr 19, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Yuting Lin wrote: > Hi all > > I try to random access the sequence file which is blocked compressed > by > "com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec.class". However, when the > program > contains more than one seek(offset) followed by next(), it leads > unexpected > error in Java (The offset passed to seek() is the beginning position > of the > block). > > If the sequence file is compressed by > "org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.class", there is no such > error. > > My Linux is 32-bit 2.6.27, Lzo version is 0.1.0. OS, Java version is > 1.6.0. > The log of error is shown below. > > Is there any approach to random access the lzo-file in Hadoop? Thanks. > - > Regards > Yuting > > --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- > > OS:lenny/sid > > uname:Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 13:01:41 UTC 2009 i686 > libc:glibc 2.8.90 NPTL 2.8.90 > rlimit: STACK 8192k, CORE 0k, NPROC 26607, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity > load average:0.03 0.11 0.14 > > CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 6 model 15 > stepping > 11, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, ssse3 > > Memory: 4k page, physical 3369768k(1217868k free), swap > 1140572k(1140572k > free) > > vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (11.0-b15) for linux-x86 JRE > (1.6.0_10-b33), built on Sep 26 2008 01:05:20 by "java_re" with gcc > 3.2.1-7a > (J2SE release) > > --------------- T H R E A D --------------- > > Current thread (0x09542000): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, > id=22346, stack(0xb7e6e000,0xb7ebf000)] > > siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR), > si_addr=0x09a82000 > > Registers: > EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x7181cff4, ECX=0x01048f83, EDX=0x00074de0 > ESP=0xb7ebd6c4, EBP=0xb7ebd6f8, ESI=0x09a0c7b5, EDI=0x09a0d21b > EIP=0x716d644b, CR2=0x09a82000, EFLAGS=0x00210212 > > Top of Stack: (sp=0xb7ebd6c4) > 0xb7ebd6c4: 00fd419e 00000000 01048f82 09a0d21f > 0xb7ebd6d4: 09a0c7b9 099fc003 09a0d21b 099fc21e > 0xb7ebd6e4: 095c644c 00000022 7181cff4 09542114 > 0xb7ebd6f4: 09542000 b7ebd7f8 7181a994 099fc000 > 0xb7ebd704: 00000003 09a0d000 b7ebd764 00000000 > 0xb7ebd714: 00000000 b4dec439 716d6200 099fc002 > 0xb7ebd724: 00000000 ae190570 b7ebd72c 72a18ae0 > 0xb7ebd734: b7ebd848 00000003 00010000 72a18af0 > > Instructions: (pc=0x716d644b) > 0x716d643b: 26 00 00 00 00 8b 44 16 04 8b 7d e4 83 6d cc 04 > 0x716d644b: 89 44 17 04 83 c2 04 83 7d cc 03 77 e8 8d 41 fb > ... From general-return-1421-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 19:10:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57327 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 19:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 19:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 11816 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11782 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 19:10:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:10:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:10:34 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so112502pxi.35 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fLIRkYR8O5dmaWT8zwwE11BdmrePIFPBEAhwYXMH/Ls=; b=tgxR4b+8+BQ9FoUU7SYaY2R9ReKcsLwSEli+XUs1LcpTL2T/6IQYx0kZh8eS6vIR80 LlCVgdKLzVCP74WSjKzOCVqAKfiuL0J3qAi0+9kx5AoFDUzi9coCeb6EtzzNGsqeRsM6 uQPZPdo6S+R/WqArxWAlkzFg4dkqg/6LNzGhg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eAOJsp9j1HTPKOZwHgWi+2VLujICFqQZ9ZNT0MZIBFhy6RxPzbg+MndqW67MgF/AOb jSSt+mxhs7NF+N28duX3N6NFWJa8amiSiAEAKBVpg/wUJs+jcBW+H6Qe/pW1U4fXcwUs ZVRPh9lGCLfTXfkAc6QVffmEaKhiYFHR13+uE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.20.212 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:10:12 -0700 Received: by 10.140.247.16 with SMTP id u16mr4650717rvh.215.1271704213479; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error while random accessing Lzo file in Hadoop From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey, You are running an extremely old JVM. Could you try with JDK 1.6.0_19? (or at least 14) Also your ulimit -n is fairly low 1024 file handles is not enough. Try 32k -ryan On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Yuting Lin wrote: > Hi all > > I try to random access the sequence file which is blocked compressed by > "com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec.class". =A0However, when the program > contains more than one seek(offset) followed by next(), it leads unexpect= ed > error in Java (The offset passed to seek() is the beginning position of t= he > block). > > If the sequence file is compressed by > "org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.class", there is no such error. > > My Linux is 32-bit 2.6.27, Lzo version is 0.1.0. OS, Java version is 1.6.= 0. > The log of error is shown below. > > Is there any approach to random access the lzo-file in Hadoop? Thanks. > - > Regards > Yuting > > --------------- =A0S Y S T E M =A0--------------- > > OS:lenny/sid > > uname:Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 13:01:41 UTC 2009 i686 > libc:glibc 2.8.90 NPTL 2.8.90 > rlimit: STACK 8192k, CORE 0k, NPROC 26607, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity > load average:0.03 0.11 0.14 > > CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 6 model 15 stepp= ing > 11, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, ssse3 > > Memory: 4k page, physical 3369768k(1217868k free), swap 1140572k(1140572k > free) > > vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (11.0-b15) for linux-x86 JRE > (1.6.0_10-b33), built on Sep 26 2008 01:05:20 by "java_re" with gcc 3.2.1= -7a > (J2SE release) > > --------------- =A0T H R E A D =A0--------------- > > Current thread (0x09542000): =A0JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, > id=3D22346, stack(0xb7e6e000,0xb7ebf000)] > > siginfo:si_signo=3DSIGSEGV: si_errno=3D0, si_code=3D1 (SEGV_MAPERR), > si_addr=3D0x09a82000 > > Registers: > EAX=3D0x00000000, EBX=3D0x7181cff4, ECX=3D0x01048f83, EDX=3D0x00074de0 > ESP=3D0xb7ebd6c4, EBP=3D0xb7ebd6f8, ESI=3D0x09a0c7b5, EDI=3D0x09a0d21b > EIP=3D0x716d644b, CR2=3D0x09a82000, EFLAGS=3D0x00210212 > > Top of Stack: (sp=3D0xb7ebd6c4) > 0xb7ebd6c4: =A0 00fd419e 00000000 01048f82 09a0d21f > 0xb7ebd6d4: =A0 09a0c7b9 099fc003 09a0d21b 099fc21e > 0xb7ebd6e4: =A0 095c644c 00000022 7181cff4 09542114 > 0xb7ebd6f4: =A0 09542000 b7ebd7f8 7181a994 099fc000 > 0xb7ebd704: =A0 00000003 09a0d000 b7ebd764 00000000 > 0xb7ebd714: =A0 00000000 b4dec439 716d6200 099fc002 > 0xb7ebd724: =A0 00000000 ae190570 b7ebd72c 72a18ae0 > 0xb7ebd734: =A0 b7ebd848 00000003 00010000 72a18af0 > > Instructions: (pc=3D0x716d644b) > 0x716d643b: =A0 26 00 00 00 00 8b 44 16 04 8b 7d e4 83 6d cc 04 > 0x716d644b: =A0 89 44 17 04 83 c2 04 83 7d cc 03 77 e8 8d 41 fb > ... > From general-return-1422-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 02:31:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17652 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 02:31:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 02:31:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 64824 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 02:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64564 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 02:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64556 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 02:31:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mikelin36@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:31:22 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so3121049gxk.11 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:31:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dpX5Zmw4X5qpNtpxgXTzhB65xFQ16GqWa+lzvWt1f1A=; b=sjbQNeNqlw086jypO2TIlR7Gu3pvwNibVNuF6HSohK+RUFTDjHAe9VnPQlOn62eQkn v+U/C0/ffEpvvpOjBojQRtB0/evQXdn0jllbpAatlRC5Uuk1OM2a4QBqev75MoCHWmxD oUL1TKmQJSWAm+lLPZJ9/N1qQyzaDl8M+6NhY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=plKXphZG1vN5NFIJmqqCNLPGDgIFyBVq8Mn/jR2maF9h+gi1qkt/qDWU/REbym8lGV Nu9SrE/E8UOBdWhkwCL04wBk1cHyp+yCasWKoA9cO326vQgLsiUGZVw10tFpgRfXt9lH yWS4T3lLW28Zl31SyYhdpMHrvGFxLJtfYWkk4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.242.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:30:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:30:55 +0800 Received: by 10.101.192.33 with SMTP id u33mr14907975anp.237.1271730655407; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error while random accessing Lzo file in Hadoop From: Yuting Lin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92c56f79d580484a1ddf0 --001636c92c56f79d580484a1ddf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Hong and Ryan Thanks for your suggestion. I update the jdk to 1.6.0_20 and try but it doesn't solves the problems. The nofile doesn't affect the codes here since there is only one thread read the file, and it's the second pair of seek() and next() that caused the error. I have reported the bug at http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/issues/list and shared the test program. Thanks. - Regards Yuting On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > Hey, > > You are running an extremely old JVM. Could you try with JDK > 1.6.0_19? (or at least 14) > > Also your ulimit -n is fairly low 1024 file handles is not enough. Try 32k > > -ryan > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Yuting Lin wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I try to random access the sequence file which is blocked compressed by > > "com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec.class". However, when the program > > contains more than one seek(offset) followed by next(), it leads > unexpected > > error in Java (The offset passed to seek() is the beginning position of > the > > block). > > > > If the sequence file is compressed by > > "org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.class", there is no such error. > > > > My Linux is 32-bit 2.6.27, Lzo version is 0.1.0. OS, Java version is > 1.6.0. > > The log of error is shown below. > > > > Is there any approach to random access the lzo-file in Hadoop? Thanks. > > - > > Regards > > Yuting > > > > --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- > > > > OS:lenny/sid > > > > uname:Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 13:01:41 UTC 2009 i686 > > libc:glibc 2.8.90 NPTL 2.8.90 > > rlimit: STACK 8192k, CORE 0k, NPROC 26607, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity > > load average:0.03 0.11 0.14 > > > > CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 6 model 15 > stepping > > 11, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, ssse3 > > > > Memory: 4k page, physical 3369768k(1217868k free), swap 1140572k(1140572k > > free) > > > > vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (11.0-b15) for linux-x86 JRE > > (1.6.0_10-b33), built on Sep 26 2008 01:05:20 by "java_re" with gcc > 3.2.1-7a > > (J2SE release) > > > > --------------- T H R E A D --------------- > > > > Current thread (0x09542000): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, > > id=22346, stack(0xb7e6e000,0xb7ebf000)] > > > > siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR), > > si_addr=0x09a82000 > > > > Registers: > > EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x7181cff4, ECX=0x01048f83, EDX=0x00074de0 > > ESP=0xb7ebd6c4, EBP=0xb7ebd6f8, ESI=0x09a0c7b5, EDI=0x09a0d21b > > EIP=0x716d644b, CR2=0x09a82000, EFLAGS=0x00210212 > > > > Top of Stack: (sp=0xb7ebd6c4) > > 0xb7ebd6c4: 00fd419e 00000000 01048f82 09a0d21f > > 0xb7ebd6d4: 09a0c7b9 099fc003 09a0d21b 099fc21e > > 0xb7ebd6e4: 095c644c 00000022 7181cff4 09542114 > > 0xb7ebd6f4: 09542000 b7ebd7f8 7181a994 099fc000 > > 0xb7ebd704: 00000003 09a0d000 b7ebd764 00000000 > > 0xb7ebd714: 00000000 b4dec439 716d6200 099fc002 > > 0xb7ebd724: 00000000 ae190570 b7ebd72c 72a18ae0 > > 0xb7ebd734: b7ebd848 00000003 00010000 72a18af0 > > > > Instructions: (pc=0x716d644b) > > 0x716d643b: 26 00 00 00 00 8b 44 16 04 8b 7d e4 83 6d cc 04 > > 0x716d644b: 89 44 17 04 83 c2 04 83 7d cc 03 77 e8 8d 41 fb > > ... > > > --001636c92c56f79d580484a1ddf0-- From general-return-1423-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 03:29:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35031 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 03:29:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 03:29:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2589 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 03:29:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2193 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 03:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2185 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 03:29:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:29:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of haoguohua@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:28:59 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so2745634ywh.5 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qGBzBnofMCXmEWuXsqGpRS8vOyuHJNYlDJOmC+p8yoY=; b=fSZQBoueaTtAcaZbFIbIF5B5G3VIcp/0FUlNeSuVCNalOMT7zMD0kgW84Jnh1YscFz KBkPIu0Nog7awOpOIaHnb60UWA7FadP3w0fuRfmprLe02FsIvvrRaDYKjTn7688tb3cm Srn2Ca+7/vHiKbfygUs7/2HwhuwaGbHJW46Kw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TNLPRGnwtq7Hd7cRpypIhiLd2VNFFnxJMhmfAAyWWqLVbeooiVaIF+85JOVEh92nvQ YgNpE5ZBr7Eq8EIV/i6SlbIpnCy0DuiRUMwjLwknjnwp55XEssl/05CPuGy3FeP0pJBV hffclwn35Qi37Ub7o5lnRia2aM1relbWiTTvI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.111.18 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:28:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:28:38 -0500 Received: by 10.150.235.9 with SMTP id i9mr6764029ybh.239.1271734118057; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group From: Guohua Hao To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3417a5b096c0484a2acdf --000e0cd3417a5b096c0484a2acdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would like to join as well. -- Guohua On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kapil Mistry wrote: > I would be interested as well. > > Kapil > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Seidman < > jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack a > user > > group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud > > computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot me > an > > email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so > > facilities shouldn't be an issue. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jonathan Seidman > > > --000e0cd3417a5b096c0484a2acdf-- From general-return-1424-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 03:33:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36356 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 03:33:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 03:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5667 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 03:33:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5527 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 03:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5519 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 03:33:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:33:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:33:11 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3K3EPou009302 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:14:25 -0500 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7F4DC43220F9 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id WlTn4vIlkqgc5XvQ for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o3K3WjGq027745 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:44 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:32:43 -0500 Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group Thread-Index: AcrgOaTxC3apEgyKRS6PL7IMEFfMWgAAA+JQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Hey! Not to steal Jonathan's thunder, but if you want to e-mail me your contac= t info, I'll create a spread sheet so we can figure out a date/time/place= , and create a mailing list to take this offline from the general mailing= list. I'm sure that guys who are more than an hour (non-rush hour traffic) outs= ide of Chicago will want to venture in to town. (Ok maybe someone from Mi= lwaukee might hop a train?) Thx -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Guohua Hao [mailto:haoguohua@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:29 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group I would like to join as well. -- Guohua On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kapil Mistry wro= te: > I would be interested as well. > > Kapil > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Seidman < > jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack = a > user > > group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud > > computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot = me > an > > email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so > > facilities shouldn't be an issue. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jonathan Seidman > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1425-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 05:57:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59602 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 05:57:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 05:57:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 64365 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 05:57:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63924 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 05:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63913 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 05:57:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:57:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:57:15 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.121] ([10.73.152.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3K5uQlk068562 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <87E99CEB-0A57-4434-8C4A-AE6C3384E56B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Hong Tang To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Error while random accessing Lzo file in Hadoop Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:56:26 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yuting, Thanks for reporting the bug, I will take a look. -Hong On Apr 19, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Yuting Lin wrote: > Hi Hong and Ryan > > Thanks for your suggestion. > > I update the jdk to 1.6.0_20 and try but it doesn't solves the > problems. The > nofile doesn't affect the codes here since there is only one thread > read the > file, and it's the second pair of seek() and next() that caused the > error. > > I have reported the bug at > http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/issues/list and > shared the > test program. > > Thanks. > - > Regards > Yuting > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Ryan Rawson > wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> You are running an extremely old JVM. Could you try with JDK >> 1.6.0_19? (or at least 14) >> >> Also your ulimit -n is fairly low 1024 file handles is not enough. >> Try 32k >> >> -ryan >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Yuting Lin >> wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I try to random access the sequence file which is blocked >>> compressed by >>> "com.hadoop.compression.lzo.LzoCodec.class". However, when the >>> program >>> contains more than one seek(offset) followed by next(), it leads >> unexpected >>> error in Java (The offset passed to seek() is the beginning >>> position of >> the >>> block). >>> >>> If the sequence file is compressed by >>> "org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.class", there is no such >>> error. >>> >>> My Linux is 32-bit 2.6.27, Lzo version is 0.1.0. OS, Java version is >> 1.6.0. >>> The log of error is shown below. >>> >>> Is there any approach to random access the lzo-file in Hadoop? >>> Thanks. >>> - >>> Regards >>> Yuting >>> >>> --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- >>> >>> OS:lenny/sid >>> >>> uname:Linux 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 13:01:41 UTC 2009 >>> i686 >>> libc:glibc 2.8.90 NPTL 2.8.90 >>> rlimit: STACK 8192k, CORE 0k, NPROC 26607, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity >>> load average:0.03 0.11 0.14 >>> >>> CPU:total 2 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 6 model 15 >> stepping >>> 11, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, ssse3 >>> >>> Memory: 4k page, physical 3369768k(1217868k free), swap >>> 1140572k(1140572k >>> free) >>> >>> vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (11.0-b15) for linux-x86 JRE >>> (1.6.0_10-b33), built on Sep 26 2008 01:05:20 by "java_re" with gcc >> 3.2.1-7a >>> (J2SE release) >>> >>> --------------- T H R E A D --------------- >>> >>> Current thread (0x09542000): JavaThread "main" [_thread_in_native, >>> id=22346, stack(0xb7e6e000,0xb7ebf000)] >>> >>> siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR), >>> si_addr=0x09a82000 >>> >>> Registers: >>> EAX=0x00000000, EBX=0x7181cff4, ECX=0x01048f83, EDX=0x00074de0 >>> ESP=0xb7ebd6c4, EBP=0xb7ebd6f8, ESI=0x09a0c7b5, EDI=0x09a0d21b >>> EIP=0x716d644b, CR2=0x09a82000, EFLAGS=0x00210212 >>> >>> Top of Stack: (sp=0xb7ebd6c4) >>> 0xb7ebd6c4: 00fd419e 00000000 01048f82 09a0d21f >>> 0xb7ebd6d4: 09a0c7b9 099fc003 09a0d21b 099fc21e >>> 0xb7ebd6e4: 095c644c 00000022 7181cff4 09542114 >>> 0xb7ebd6f4: 09542000 b7ebd7f8 7181a994 099fc000 >>> 0xb7ebd704: 00000003 09a0d000 b7ebd764 00000000 >>> 0xb7ebd714: 00000000 b4dec439 716d6200 099fc002 >>> 0xb7ebd724: 00000000 ae190570 b7ebd72c 72a18ae0 >>> 0xb7ebd734: b7ebd848 00000003 00010000 72a18af0 >>> >>> Instructions: (pc=0x716d644b) >>> 0x716d643b: 26 00 00 00 00 8b 44 16 04 8b 7d e4 83 6d cc 04 >>> 0x716d644b: 89 44 17 04 83 c2 04 83 7d cc 03 77 e8 8d 41 fb >>> ... >>> >> From general-return-1426-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 14:07:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16692 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 14:07:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 14:07:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 52105 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52031 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:07:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52023 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 14:07:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:07:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:07:33 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so68415gwb.35 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YTnX6gsOwKtMGzOeV1r01nTXDPnSgzDNpvHdCdtEj9w=; b=EU8ctf8P+laR37EH/YOvhwwrIcnLfqv4AdNRnWVE5lWQSDbRR7OYSNypvHT4KbashM JjWca97VJtx1Xy7MRP0hOweAgpHWf6P9SKh6D6GOUmnoz9FFJXAvuRTnu+DIxHZgj9H8 8GCTpeEcq9462l+y1Wch7wyhNe6KNngwjsHLg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fJXYtG08rrfoH43R2WkRzTTlqRvKwaG6QtrE4mZ2wirZBod6u+/SoystidA6ZnAC7a b5sj8APRd26e07tP3+CyThm8Z7X0xLHrnwXfi4geN9cjDqmJKVn3cqXF8GpFL3eAblVX ufsN7LEJ4qkFwN4NINFnvyfB1FNso6hq5xVlc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.165.5 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:07:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:07:10 -0500 Received: by 10.100.56.30 with SMTP id e30mr17141273ana.38.1271772430865; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a642fb3f940484ab9793 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f9a642fb3f940484ab9793 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 MIke - Thanks! That'd be awesome. I'll send you an email to sync up. Jonathan On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Hey! > Not to steal Jonathan's thunder, but if you want to e-mail me your contact > info, I'll create a spread sheet so we can figure out a date/time/place, and > create a mailing list to take this offline from the general mailing list. > > I'm sure that guys who are more than an hour (non-rush hour traffic) > outside of Chicago will want to venture in to town. (Ok maybe someone from > Milwaukee might hop a train?) > > > Thx > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Guohua Hao [mailto:haoguohua@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:29 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Chicago Hadoop User Group > > I would like to join as well. > > -- Guohua > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Kapil Mistry > wrote: > > > I would be interested as well. > > > > Kapil > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Seidman < > > jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Despite a thriving software industry, the Chicago area seems to lack a > > user > > > group for Hadoop and related technologies - Hive, HBase, nosql, cloud > > > computing, etc. If you agree that us Chicagoans deserve a HUG, shoot me > > an > > > email. My employer, located in the west loop, will provide space so > > > facilities shouldn't be an issue. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Jonathan Seidman > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > --001485f9a642fb3f940484ab9793-- From general-return-1427-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 07:11:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24127 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 07:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 07:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9953 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 07:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9667 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 07:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9652 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 07:11:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:11:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:11:11 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4Tzy-0004Gc-Q1 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:05:26 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: German speaking company to run a hadoop cluster with crawlers and search Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:10:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004210910.49092.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm searching for a german speaking company in central Europe, which already runs hadoop clusters, is experienced in information retrieval and crawling. I'd like to know, if there would be interest to take over the task of running the backend for an already running and selling media monitoring company in Switzerland. This is ATM a private request from me, the sole and only developer who is in charge to keep this thing running 24/7 and to implement new features in parallel... Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1428-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 11:09:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83786 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 11:09:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 65467 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65096 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65088 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:09:23 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so3429470ywh.5 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:09:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hqQjz0lJB8j1qAqjPEyKtb5zPByzf8OhkmYgejRY5vM=; b=vTALgj1Nsg1RRbszSfURyIWzHGpbfFD0A/kZuLSqajvPWNqxxmkTljeh1aHflJDeKv KgXw95Ywj+pVdw87V6XA+f+DtI8ho3PzZm9lWkrBxBO7R43obZ1IcYgQwUWRfTEaaELP BZrBA9PznMgN3BHUEfry/JsomsK7ikZ/p4LXU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dRiWXIMlgEQIkFPjC68lTFi8tnNa+QVecbHX7qM8exo7qxxRLxeOelM5NCNhnRIEIX xuWYm/wl8onxS+JJdOZiZs/YWuYFVs8ZtfoYE+wQJyNvx6NLfHh7h5ZD78QEIUg5srsD ae8RrvvHWT8ZnJyxMIA69+tZ+YnLxEpPfabpU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.4.21 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:09:01 -0400 Received: by 10.101.175.37 with SMTP id c37mr19395865anp.56.1271848141754; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: dfs.data.dir From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would like to add/remove more data directories to my hdfs installation. Currently, what I do is decommision the entire node and then remove all content from dfs.data.dir and renable the node. But is there an easier way? Each of my node consists of 2TB of data and I don't want to waste the time... From general-return-1429-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:42:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44652 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:42:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:42:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 55122 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:42:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55004 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54996 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:42:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-76.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:42:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 44382 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:42:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:42:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4BCF38F1.4090103@apache.org> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:42:09 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: how to split data References: <1E766DC73403B144A7FF3C3A3888D0C7143229@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> In-Reply-To: <1E766DC73403B144A7FF3C3A3888D0C7143229@BLR-EC-MBX02.wipro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit lee.sungeun@wipro.com wrote: > if the block size is 64MB and i am supposed to hadle 129MB. How will it split? (64,64,1) or (64,64,64) (64,65) FileInputFormat permits the final split to exceed the desired split size by up to 10%. Doug From general-return-1430-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 19:34:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29676 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 19:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 19:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 85655 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85595 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85587 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 19:34:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:34:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:34:02 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3LJGUkq009085 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:16:30 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6DE8047F289F for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id EAIbFRbIghRXaT1o for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o3LJXY8Q017980 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:35 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:34 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Announce] Local Chicago area Hadoop User Group (CHUG) Thread-Topic: [Announce] Local Chicago area Hadoop User Group (CHUG) Thread-Index: AcrhiYfGWxS0Lma4TESRHE88DO+iPg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607D37F67hqexmb02adnav_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607D37F67hqexmb02adnav_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 All, I've set up a Meetup site for the Chicago area Hadoop User Group. http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoop-User-Group-CHUG/ With the majority of those interested working downtown, I think our first= meeting will be downtown. Haven't yet set up a date, or location.... But this is just the first ste= p. Please feel free to spread the word. Thx -Mike Michael Segel Architect, R&D NAVTEQ 425 West Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60606 (T) +1 312-780-3432 (C) +1 312-952-8175 www.navteq.com The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. --_000_ABC24175AFD3BE4DA15F4CD375ED413D0607D37F67hqexmb02adnav_-- From general-return-1431-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 21:34:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1798 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 21:34:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 21:34:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 58759 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:34:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58532 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:34:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58524 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 21:34:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:34:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:34:18 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so5461510pwi.35 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.100.13 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:56 -0700 Received: by 10.142.207.18 with SMTP id e18mr4094591wfg.158.1271885637033; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Mag, You can bring down the datanode daemon, add the extra dfs.data.dir and then restart. Since blocks are round robin'd the new directory will have lower utilization (one other directories are full it will start catching up). If that's not OK you can re-balance the directories by hand with cp when the datanode is down (before you restart it). If this takes you longer than 10 minutes the blocks on that datanode will start getting re-replicated but when you bring the datanode back up the namenode will notice the over-replicated blocks and remove them. Thanks, Eli On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > I would like to add/remove more data directories to my hdfs installation. > > Currently, what I do is decommision the entire node and then remove > all content from dfs.data.dir and renable the node. But is there an > easier way? Each of my node consists of 2TB of data and I don't want > to waste the time... > From general-return-1432-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 12:42:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67617 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 12:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 12:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 91010 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 12:42:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90897 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 12:42:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90889 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 12:42:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:42:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:42:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE835B7E29 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:42:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eIZowgjnjdKk for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:41:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8985EB7E25 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:41:49 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1272544898.40915@AoG9MTUraCorLtUoLXV+9A Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3MCfZwa025684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:41:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:41:36 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3MCfZwa025684 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Mag, > > You can bring down the datanode daemon, add the extra dfs.data.dir and > then restart. Since blocks are round robin'd the new directory will > have lower utilization (one other directories are full it will start > catching up). If that's not OK you can re-balance the directories by > hand with cp when the datanode is down (before you restart it). If > this takes you longer than 10 minutes the blocks on that datanode will > start getting re-replicated but when you bring the datanode back up > the namenode will notice the over-replicated blocks and remove them. that brings up a couple of issues I've been thinking about now that workers can go to 6+ HDDs/node * a way to measure the distribution across disks, rather than just nodes. DfsClient doesn't provide enough info here yet. * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position stuff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just local disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. From general-return-1433-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 17:40:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77755 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 17:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 17:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 9679 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:40:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9584 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9575 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 17:40:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.182] (HELO web81903.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:40:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 34529 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Apr 2010 17:39:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1271957987; bh=9/fuQLALgTK2J0uLp4uNkkl9LHld2j8bK+yjwms3vVg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=il4F4NK87S2WPi4345jw2AnphPuo4gYe2IVEquo/mkVMFKRUhS3NX8ZeenO1niAePY6f6svtX1FH7g0hx5Yr2RPxwJumtZ1jAfzgbamEXwOE8OReGptt5PPqQi32Aabl2+K9E1vb448Gg/OEMdpQfCtagy+Qo2pqIj/SQGD14As= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UtwhtDoRbEc1EFSVboZBXJH/lX/4ThOgBEegH15lLebw60xSqTpZBOTNriK2ui7sEd85g+hWf/4fOhtmVNpb3GkvWd9U5s9YGZ/FjCCd/B1fPwjABcmN0hhFO6ghHiNZTo2g0sI97RP+aq8EacuVC5Cd5gMMszOSKYyCWqJzpDE=; Message-ID: <225.32177.qm@web81903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0BKIJKYVM1kr1qxNdncqj8DJWyrMP3i_0IsGpvPZViw149T MKBCSjenqjkS09a8j.i4mtgAb_EmQTt8aCulr7qkBpU2zrO5rS.a5IO3.bQ_ P.KS0Pn2tPtGLpodDjf6XsfYT6Ap6tOpXBwMVUzJlbllTr_P8Na81l2j0J11 PwGcFTQr8BRPMBSvbgYAXFOPyEF5GD9P.d.vvJNt2IA7unZjsSpdjLtwkqQJ jsVJIY8jwSvB7QSxp.U.0SkMMwtrvUW2Urp4G9uzhNOS32Qjkl3OrvZ7dTUr wBEBmWW6JEZA9.OERRhk5CDe0T_kdHBQoviTm Received: from [64.140.94.70] by web81903.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:39:46 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.1.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.102.267879 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Rana Aich Subject: Where is the 'user' directory To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I'm a newbie in this sphere...I've downloaded Hadoop yesterday and am going thru the commands listed in the Quick Start page. I went to http://localhost:50070 the DFS home page. >From there I clicked 'Browse the File System' link. There I could see two directories: /tmp /user and all there subdirectories and files. But when I go to my File sytem I'm unable to find 'user' directory. Though the DFS home page lists it under "/" (root directory) - I couldn't find any directory of that name. Interestingly /tmp is there. I ran 'find / -name' as Superuser for "user" directory but there is none. Am I missing something here? Thanking you all in advance. -raich From general-return-1434-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 17:46:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81295 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 17:46:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 17:46:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21324 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:46:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21278 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21270 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 17:46:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:46:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:46:09 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so190633wyb.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:45:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.164.203 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:45:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <225.32177.qm@web81903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <225.32177.qm@web81903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:45:49 -0400 Received: by 10.216.89.81 with SMTP id b59mr558346wef.97.1271958349508; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Where is the 'user' directory From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HDFS is a user space file system meaning it is a virtual file system, different from the OS file systems (like ext3, xfs). To access files on HDFS you use the 'hadoop fs' command. Ex: hadoop fs -ls / This is different than your OS / partition and will contain the same view as the web UI. On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Rana Aich wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a newbie in this sphere...I've downloaded Hadoop yesterday and am going thru the commands listed in the Quick Start page. > > I went to http://localhost:50070 the DFS home page. > From there I clicked 'Browse the File System' link. > > There I could see two directories: > /tmp > /user > > and all there subdirectories and files. > > But when I go to my File sytem I'm unable to find 'user' directory. Though the DFS home page lists it under "/" (root directory) - I couldn't find any directory of that name. Interestingly /tmp is there. > > I ran 'find / -name' as Superuser for "user" directory but there is none. > > Am I missing something here? > > Thanking you all in advance. > -raich > -- Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1435-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 19:59:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61956 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 58455 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:59:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58420 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:59:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58411 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 19:59:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:59:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:59:40 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=L0NGGDS0BmVQhMichuZuzpz0T5MQCmKSavEhp9D/vx7JPQGpwGNtbGvh DDXN+eFIgWiNVOW/QnLLuJVnjZjK+BDW9JTPCDFqbCEi7AXmc8FH2l/t+ eIWzm7lp98upEkk; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1271966380; x=1303502380; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20dfs.data.dir|Date:=20Thu,=2022=20Apr=20 2010=2019:59:18=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<51FEB071-B163-4B01 -A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version: =201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<25c6fce2-8d3b-4ac2-8c2d-a17dca0af983> |In-Reply-To:=20<4BD04400.90800@apache.org>|References: =20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<4BD04400.90800@apache .org>; bh=QKuYumno2DbWzE7An23Rd54R9ez8NI4Ylnnw27EwYW4=; b=WzpAmdES+gmoUY34Hi/V58F8OsrurDIinwgWgFJ6W4klN2K0obrnzPJW TnzY+33pNa22NC58KmEEMfJrO6740xP7ZdpPSFrJoI+WxdlHLjbFnH+mr 8V4gb28DsRUKPql; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,258,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12124020" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:59:20 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:59:20 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:59:19 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir Thread-Topic: dfs.data.dir Thread-Index: AQHK4UMhXQAV3PvzLEKrqdMha3hZoZIt54MAgAD9mQCAAHpLAA== Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:59:18 +0000 Message-ID: <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25c6fce2-8d3b-4ac2-8c2d-a17dca0af983> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2010 19:59:20.0905 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C52F390:01CAE256] On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > that brings up a couple of issues I've been thinking about now that worke= rs can go to 6+ HDDs/node >=20 > * a way to measure the distribution across disks, rather than just nodes.= DfsClient doesn't provide enough info here yet. What should probably happen is that instead of throwing you to the file bro= wser, clicking on a host from the live nodes page should probably put you o= n a "stats about this node" page. > * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position stu= ff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just local = disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. Yup. Working with 8 drives per node, it is interesting to see how unbalanc= ed the data gets after a while. [Luckily, we have MR tmp space segregated = off so I'm sure it would be a lot worse if we didn't!] Someone should file a jira. :) From general-return-1436-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:37:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16398 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 12416 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12368 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12360 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:37:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:37:07 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so5415841wwb.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.7 with SMTP id g7mr674497wek.7.1271972205801; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wlan-snve-152-231.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip6.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e82sm233314wej.16.2010.04.22.14.36.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:36:41 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) All, Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security- logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen From general-return-1437-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:44:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20125 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:44:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:44:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 24547 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:44:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24489 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:44:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24480 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:44:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:44:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:44:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 19963 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:44:28 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:44:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD0C33C.6070400@apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:44:28 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo > (hadoop-security-logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. Allow use where? What's the intended purpose for this logo? As Hadoop releases add security features, won't the existing logo suffice? Doug From general-return-1438-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 22:18:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37137 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 22:18:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 22:18:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 56232 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56082 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56074 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 22:18:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:00 +0000 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8a8B1e0090cZkys56mHgxx; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:17:40 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8mHX1e0032SbwD53WmHaDM; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:17:38 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4BD0C33C.6070400@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:17:28 -0700 References: <4BD0C33C.6070400@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security- >> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. > > Allow use where? What's the intended purpose for this logo? The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo. It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the Hadoop security features. -- Owen From general-return-1439-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 02:36:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15807 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 02:36:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 02:36:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 61326 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 02:36:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61135 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 02:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61127 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 02:36:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:36:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:35:59 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so900886pxi.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.100.13 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:38 -0700 Received: by 10.143.85.4 with SMTP id n4mr2452238wfl.198.1271990138091; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position st= uff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just local= disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. > > > Yup. =A0Working with 8 drives per node, it is interesting to see how unba= lanced the data gets after a while. =A0[Luckily, we have MR tmp space segre= gated off so I'm sure it would be a lot worse if we didn't!] How unbalanced do you see your mounts? I've mostly heard of this being an issue when new disks are added. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1440-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:18:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34794 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:18:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 29034 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28866 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28858 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:18:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:18:38 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so5258739gxk.11 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:18:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mmszG50e7AjhhxCU4QLMM2CIDWCfG9m1Teu0CskvK40=; b=MwbUOBPviARVyYbU1J6JsFGG6tFC8qjo76xyztO6kWq+6BPgGeDDwAXmkzUKqbIodc yBd0cYx5mghBiXp5kZTxCI2aA+tsb7cBpowYGfZEPWG2ujkN90WxiU5IMLyh/xXE1gV3 q7Heoom5aebA41MSr51jU0JeX01xO0NrbGMy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TL8ITrDbotY86b5TRDB9Qm6IQdVt2AsqxgwObS2foD5SUusRbylyZEHwtrOhfiIej3 lwrQ1z/gFzNJ7814f0mvSnIjJ0dIN3hlwUCVQISFE1Yd5YqTbHxFMUS456wjc+Ihcw1q ZOVPq0LH5YdQrb4HQiPkDCLkuwsvh6Sn6j24o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:18:16 -0400 Received: by 10.150.120.22 with SMTP id s22mr11067040ybc.199.1271996296771; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All, I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom JDBC code from the reducers. Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ --- Gautam Singaraju From general-return-1441-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:28:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37007 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 33040 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:28:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32880 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32872 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:28:07 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so6638286pwi.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:27:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JnTY6gJa2ztDNePvOahNjLH/RvG9raTK2HQj/cCKk+4=; b=VKjOs074/RfQhGSlLX+vfwXiZd5lLK1TMKp46ALMvUgUjjSteakJ0+9yIDMIS8N7X7 f1izZFoCVCfl6ZZRHQItNSim8xD1ouEXSO3jJbyz/f8tB9WObhXJT8lblrBS9ahBQzgE FMgEoDlkvK9mgcMgkNfjmX65jcXKSpwtbCabg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZrHa3d54Xx77NFMxTVbyKWnj97iMXlfmxab9NLbafQ3XShL11n6w13o7tc3ojiGbyx L5e+37vg+CMh+F9h84u7mppwJgrh0LbqbRLNhfqm4ELCeoouYdV9uZ13F6uIcmEUR6Yz 5DNgRaZyWTXEvlj9x8iqsKU4dsIQf593HzquU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.211.14 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:27:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:57:44 +0530 Received: by 10.143.136.7 with SMTP id o7mr5069033wfn.101.1271996864385; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3fcec41d41a0484dfd9c3 --000e0cd3fcec41d41a0484dfd9c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Gautam, DBOutputFormat inserts records one by one, which is inherently slow. You can use open source Apache licensed hiho framework which provides MySQL's "load data infile " functionality. It may be more suited to your needs. HIHO is available at http://code.google.com/p/hiho/ I havent tested it over ssh, please let me know if you need any help setting it up. Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Gautam Singaraju < gautam.singaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and > push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a > remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I > tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom > JDBC code from the reducers. > > Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there > been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an > expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. > > [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ > --- > Gautam Singaraju > --000e0cd3fcec41d41a0484dfd9c3-- From general-return-1442-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:29:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37159 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:29:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:29:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 34155 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34052 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34044 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:29:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:29:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:29:23 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so477084wyb.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:29:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.164.203 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:29:00 -0400 Received: by 10.216.88.4 with SMTP id z4mr1474277wee.121.1271996940383; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In general, you'll want to avoid tunneling permanent production code over ssh tunnels. They're flaky and do not recover from network interruption in any reasonable way. If you need to do this, a vpn is the correct approach. Linux easily will do ipsec p2p tunnels that are reasonably secure. If you really only have port 22 then I suppose that's your only option but I really would reevaluate the security policy. Either way, it's going to be slow due to the encryption overhead but if it's a small amount of data, that may be fine. On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Gautam Singaraju wrote: > All, > > I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and > push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a > remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I > tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom > JDBC code from the reducers. > > Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there > been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an > expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. > > [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ > --- > Gautam Singaraju > -- Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1443-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:32:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37349 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:32:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:32:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 36723 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36551 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36543 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:32:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:32:19 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3N4Vl9A012932 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:31:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=WCjz+23aOsE80cXAIO60CNgVpkt2jJVtFnAj7HwZtMqh5I95UZu0aeEACDmRalOY Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:31:47 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:31:45 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Thread-Index: AcriacNZWOmzZxyfQISpU83yVZoDsAANB3hx Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7F670C11C2D7ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C7F670C11C2D7ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 for using the logo at least in t-shirts & security related documentation= . On 4/22/10 3:17 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security- >> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. > > Allow use where? What's the intended purpose for this logo? The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo. It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the Hadoop security features. -- Owen --_000_C7F670C11C2D7ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1444-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:36:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38784 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:36:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:36:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 39318 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39195 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39187 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:36:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:36:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:35:58 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so5109429gyf.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:35:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/EUbMpIuvKravLvi71+I1JfVt19va2iIe5ZYlaqFZBc=; b=eMhp6lriY3A+Ro/z93mvIDAryrnW/HS+Ck7IEJqhSy6mvhGS+ps9VG2UFn+Er3X6ms tBtIsfxlHoXLohSTvE0GtEVtT5Q8GofKtL63Zho2c6ScomwQB6GSuLYo8/W6XdGpqlNL 5Ob+6pCMr1rMH1VSISi0258Pw53Wz22eiARWM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UO2DcGbAEIPqjffs5cWSWhFcHw86sN6rs7g1wP1vg1Y2vvSRebn2jAXZEz74Un/a5C iq8qMiMen5ggvCX0EP1UE7gvKT9+1FF09dv9YXegJ5I1oVE2/k7ziY/RB28FnvKtlXMy V/LHgBn75PGTjKwfUqDNNQVyPFichXA8zMR4Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.38.8 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:35:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:35:36 -0700 Received: by 10.151.59.15 with SMTP id m15mr10793514ybk.246.1271997336199; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e14c612d660484dff53f --00151750e14c612d660484dff53f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature we put into Hadoop? thanks, dhruba On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > +1 for using the logo at least in t-shirts & security related > documentation. > > > On 4/22/10 3:17 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security- > >> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > Allow use where? What's the intended purpose for this logo? > > The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo. > It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the > Hadoop security features. > > -- Owen > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --00151750e14c612d660484dff53f-- From general-return-1445-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 04:59:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45097 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 04:59:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 04:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 51949 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:59:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51688 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 04:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51675 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 04:59:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:59:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:59:02 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so5119310gyf.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oWsmk7/ZLQqgfFkFK/ccDKv44/A2WdDiYvw/4GeWrko=; b=dYYYuKUR/BF2q/w4yf+qXzAzPH8U11D22VuK/d/ByUZrVUxqrWGf8Imw2n9bW5Yd/K 1Txqb+VgDXGtrHgdrgy6SZR2WxY8enUIzAHfiz3/gDU2bZWPsaPf3c9GAlWLxZ0L2Ll2 sO9RKJDB1YgLOcjw1ix+RXrRN6aPALoOujf0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pm7K86ivwVy8/AofXMFD+NNBKaoTA0xpiRQx9euUy0N3Uak9JBZpAspbMpzGCHSJYt j7zJVLg/7Zyj1CUOsO24Zk+xuLhkpm+UfulPfHrMwyzsB0ShFJqY0tOIrH6/DtMU2Owx dllrN8ALNdaouWOxukMjOvUQglfaHqWgKJmTI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:58:41 -0400 Received: by 10.150.13.7 with SMTP id 7mr2648867ybm.238.1271998721584; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Sonal, I will check it out. --- Gautam On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Sonal Goyal wrote= : > Hi Gautam, > > DBOutputFormat inserts records one by one, which is inherently slow. You = can > use open source Apache licensed hiho framework which provides MySQL's "lo= ad > data infile " functionality. =A0It may be more suited to your needs. > > HIHO is available at http://code.google.com/p/hiho/ > > I havent tested it over ssh, please let me know if you need any help sett= ing > it up. > > Thanks and Regards, > Sonal > www.meghsoft.com > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Gautam Singaraju < > gautam.singaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and >> push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a >> remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I >> tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom >> JDBC code from the reducers. >> >> Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there >> been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an >> expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. >> >> [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ >> --- >> Gautam Singaraju >> > From general-return-1446-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 05:02:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46252 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 05:02:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 05:02:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 53901 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:02:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53810 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53796 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 05:02:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:02:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:02:26 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1974617gwb.35 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CVEIBErb9s3hsffX815jko2BdR7lcPmGV4Zq62RVXpk=; b=QTOV++XvW8+jpukjPHXgiW6JEQHVdq9zbuKczk2R8jVNLeXEI+l/mRLwmLbCnbqF+q X99dOED3zZJpc/hnbx5800piq5po9YPgefcbyy+wft0cpRSnqJc5wWM8eXmDd68eB8Zj ubtsMQV9Prjl2L+bocNogyyqIgw15uSbRh7Zw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bJgIe6DjHAY6/62FFGniZK7p4MSsfYxYLM53HSNInN55tKMk+NUmz+75bDky+FrlTH ebd7u6w059yqRGN5m2il4mqkwPy3JdyLpzN4wdH6h88KLnDu3fJCeHplwtRgJr/lN96d hKrJKF12CDdHFYWg+t50qzgND6RauCk+P6tyg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:02:05 -0400 Received: by 10.150.187.19 with SMTP id k19mr10978265ybf.96.1271998925532; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Then there is a need to design a local differential DB and synchronize the database with the remote location. That synchronization could be over SSH and should be atomic. --- Gautam On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > In general, you'll want to avoid tunneling permanent production code > over ssh tunnels. They're flaky and do not recover from network > interruption in any reasonable way. If you need to do this, a vpn is > the correct approach. Linux easily will do ipsec p2p tunnels that are > reasonably secure. If you really only have port 22 then I suppose > that's your only option but I really would reevaluate the security > policy. > > Either way, it's going to be slow due to the encryption overhead but > if it's a small amount of data, that may be fine. > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Gautam Singaraju > wrote: >> All, >> >> I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and >> push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a >> remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I >> tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom >> JDBC code from the reducers. >> >> Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there >> been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an >> expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. >> >> [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ >> --- >> Gautam Singaraju >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > From general-return-1447-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 05:27:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52600 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 05:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 05:27:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 72905 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:27:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72661 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72653 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 05:27:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:27:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.24] (HELO qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:27:45 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8tM41e0011swQuc52tTRdu; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:27:25 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8tTF1e0062VBGtd3btTJSl; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:27:23 +0000 Message-Id: <121803A3-CFB9-489B-96EF-027234E55D25@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <00e801cae28f$98d27310$ca775930$@com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-13--512025332 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: License for Google's patent Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:27:14 -0700 References: <00e801cae28f$98d27310$ca775930$@com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-13--512025332 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, We got the following email from Larry Rosen, Apache's legal counsel. -- Owen On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > To: ASF Board > > Several weeks ago I sought clarification from Google about its > recent patent 7,650,331 ["System and method for efficient large- > scale data processing"] that may be infringed by implementation of > the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce projects. I just received > word from Google's general counsel that "we have granted a license > for Hadoop, terms of which are specified in the CLA." > > I am very pleased to reassure the Apache community about Google's > continued generosity and commitment to ASF and open source. Will > someone here please inform the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce > projects that they need not worry about this patent. > > Best regards, > > /Larry > > > Lawrence Rosen > Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) > 3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 > Office: 707-485-1242 Cell: 707-478-8932 > Apache Software Foundation, member and counsel (www.apache.org) > Open Web Foundation, board member (www.openwebfoundation.org) > Stanford University, Instructor in Law > Author, Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual > Property Law (Prentice Hall 2004) > > --Apple-Mail-13--512025332-- From general-return-1448-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 05:31:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53991 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 05:31:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 05:31:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 75023 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74897 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 05:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74888 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 05:31:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:31:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:31:18 +0000 Received: from omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8haU1e0070b6N64AEtWzLh; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:30:59 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8tWp1e00L2VBGtd8PtWsJJ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:30:56 +0000 Message-Id: <8B5126F1-EAA7-44BE-B692-D0F7EC6638A6@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:30:48 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature > we put > into Hadoop? The issue is that to stay within Apache rules, all variants of the Hadoop elephant must be official Hadoop logos. Clearly it is not necessary to have a new logo for a feature, but it can be fun. This logo certainly doesn't harm the Hadoop image and conveys the intended meaning. *Laugh* It is amusing to imagine what append's logo would look like. If you wanted to make an append (or some other feature) logo, the logo looked nice, and didn't harm the Hadoop image, that would be reasonable in my opinion. -- Owen From general-return-1449-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 06:21:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65053 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 06:21:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 06:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13490 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 06:21:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13156 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 06:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13143 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 06:21:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:21:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:21:39 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3N6Jl7F050362 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:19:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=W3fSQNPOI0I1PAws+e6KlDPulzY5VDmn9MsltCVOTzpsT2NbEDzJCs7C+O3op6Y9 Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:18:50 -0700 Received: from 10.72.168.28 ([10.72.168.28]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:18:33 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:18:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? From: Hairong Kuang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Thread-Index: AcrirMyyecbsV9K+hk2pi97oOeCaYA== In-Reply-To: <8B5126F1-EAA7-44BE-B692-D0F7EC6638A6@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2010 06:18:50.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7106A70:01CAE2AC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I personally love to see that my daughter wears a T-shirt with a secure Hadoop logo to show off she is the youngest Hadoop contributor. :-) Hairong On 4/22/10 10:30 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > >> Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature >> we put >> into Hadoop? > > The issue is that to stay within Apache rules, all variants of the > Hadoop elephant must be official Hadoop logos. Clearly it is not > necessary to have a new logo for a feature, but it can be fun. This > logo certainly doesn't harm the Hadoop image and conveys the intended > meaning. > > *Laugh* It is amusing to imagine what append's logo would look like. > If you wanted to make an append (or some other feature) logo, the logo > looked nice, and didn't harm the Hadoop image, that would be > reasonable in my opinion. > > -- Owen From general-return-1450-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 09:19:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9694 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 09:19:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 09:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 63641 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 09:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63515 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 09:19:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63505 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 09:19:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:19:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:19:45 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o3N9I7ux045469 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=cxPNYbwX5UbmmKFFNlaBzfwWugcj0C8yTohZx6RrHQ2wYHH+3Ob1maWItlspavZM Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:45:09 +0530 From: "Ankur C. Goel" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:45:07 +0530 Subject: Re: License for Google's patent Thread-Topic: License for Google's patent Thread-Index: AcripcYujVOZKWdlSs2lGlD5j8XcnAAH7ELv Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <121803A3-CFB9-489B-96EF-027234E55D25@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7F762F31164Agankuryahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C7F762F31164Agankuryahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is such a good news for the community. Is the CLA available for public= viewing ? -@nkur On 4/23/10 10:57 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: All, We got the following email from Larry Rosen, Apache's legal counsel. -- Owen On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > To: ASF Board > > Several weeks ago I sought clarification from Google about its > recent patent 7,650,331 ["System and method for efficient large- > scale data processing"] that may be infringed by implementation of > the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce projects. I just received > word from Google's general counsel that "we have granted a license > for Hadoop, terms of which are specified in the CLA." > > I am very pleased to reassure the Apache community about Google's > continued generosity and commitment to ASF and open source. Will > someone here please inform the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce > projects that they need not worry about this patent. > > Best regards, > > /Larry > > > Lawrence Rosen > Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) > 3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 > Office: 707-485-1242 Cell: 707-478-8932 > Apache Software Foundation, member and counsel (www.apache.org) > Open Web Foundation, board member (www.openwebfoundation.org) > Stanford University, Instructor in Law > Author, Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual > Property Law (Prentice Hall 2004) > > --_000_C7F762F31164Agankuryahooinccom_-- From general-return-1451-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 11:10:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34303 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 11:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 11:10:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90205 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 11:10:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89823 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 11:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89815 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 11:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:10:38 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so637281wyb.35 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:10:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vJfV2cDuknscq5B1uUIcjqmqT44h1TWWI1pGakKidLM=; b=JMEaHs1j2KZTh5y95H6c/mAJy8seplbCzXeSwGyM8TTQpIH64UD/8rHUQr3JLXkiud EOM7NODQaYaScLZPAqo5BhSwlcpSrniORJhopWIEnVvhIZTyVfFRf27+ooM7eMPovAWJ pOv/wchYEzMtkGWVUUHb4dtv07toE63oe6MQw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FC4x7eJuILOtZXGhOdYGpdpLCRYImTqhN3+zWjwr6pLZBKT/TdJvS9awSoD9lYGidy Hu+sQgi+XGi9sw8DoD593udQtiIyeKtBkq1f+CPWcMzEnTXBm0S+/XgbL44izhD6kjzL hCE0yDdW+JMfuPVJAsPEE/JgDvncXwsF0M3Cg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.15 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:10:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <121803A3-CFB9-489B-96EF-027234E55D25@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:10:17 +0200 Received: by 10.216.88.12 with SMTP id z12mr2962260wee.165.1272021017401; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: License for Google's patent From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:15, Ankur C. Goel wrote: > Is the CLA available for public viewing ? CLAs contain personal data, so generally: No, don't think so. Bernd > > -@nkur > > > On 4/23/10 10:57 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > All, > =A0 =A0We got the following email from Larry Rosen, Apache's legal counse= l. > > -- Owen > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > >> To: ASF Board >> >> Several weeks ago I sought clarification from Google about its >> recent patent 7,650,331 ["System and method for efficient large- >> scale data processing"] that may be infringed by implementation of >> the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce projects. =A0I just received >> word from Google's general counsel that "we have granted a license >> for Hadoop, terms of which are specified in the CLA." >> >> I am very pleased to reassure the Apache community about Google's >> continued generosity and commitment to ASF and open source. Will >> someone here please inform the Apache Hadoop and Apache MapReduce >> projects that they need not worry about this patent. >> >> Best regards, >> >> /Larry >> >> >> Lawrence Rosen >> Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) >> 3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 >> Office: 707-485-1242 =A0 =A0Cell: 707-478-8932 >> Apache Software Foundation, member and counsel (www.apache.org) >> Open Web Foundation, board member (www.openwebfoundation.org) >> Stanford University, Instructor in Law >> Author, Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual >> Property Law (Prentice Hall 2004) >> >> > > > From general-return-1452-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 17:59:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37598 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 17:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 17:59:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 46160 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 17:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46093 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 17:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46085 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 17:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:59:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 37568 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 17:59:07 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:59:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:59:06 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Y!'s developed extensive security features based on the 0.20 branch. The 0.20 versions of the individual patches appear in Jira, but these have not been committed to any branch in Apache's SVN. Y! has periodically pushed out versions of these as Yahoo!'s Distribution of Hadoop at github, and Cloudera is likely to make a 0.20-based distribution including these as well. Shouldn't we commit these all to some 0.20-based branch at Apache? I'd earlier (on common-dev) suggested we might start a 1.0 branch based on 0.20, then add a 1.1 branch with the security patches. If that were done, the 0.21 release could perhaps instead be called 1.2. But, regardless of the naming, it would be good to have the 0.20 versions of all of the security patches committed to a branch at Apache so that we can make a release that includes them, patches can be targeted against this branch, etc. What do others think? Doug From general-return-1453-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 18:35:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53140 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 18:35:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 18:35:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 94579 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94485 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94476 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:35:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:35:11 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=DlYxzHNoInKtcH27z8vRGFX+cUwW+qyhIu+QHoIAPaSmawbBrlSq+xyi oX9Zs5elJOlkXePNgEOo/EwlYNphNirMf6prelr4b+caHeTpSnxZu6+yg FxN2pC9dPDBcnbt; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1272047711; x=1303583711; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20secure=200.20-based=20branc h|Date:=20Fri,=2023=20Apr=202010=2018:34:49=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20 |In-Reply-To:=20<4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org>|References: =20<4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org>; bh=PqN7SQiW9ekR5m3qPRqQBOn1aPU2k/mw8ilWSoQ8N+w=; b=CRRQM7LPBBLCvt5JhNIlgVkwytdbSUaeCHizFH9ZsDLcGYFsMMuKf4f3 tROuy3DIqNf+DY4rBfqfEoukWguylVDYXPn6pGhoBtCeJI4RxLODjrNdR sjF4hXZBoSRhzbU; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,263,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12500953" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:34:51 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:34:50 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:34:50 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch Thread-Index: AQHK4w67e+CPFqDOjkKEj2kXIrJNoJIw1oqA Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:34:49 +0000 Message-ID: <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2010 18:34:51.0179 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8F1E7B0:01CAE313] On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > What do others think? That 0.20 is not 1.0 quality, no matter how hard people want to believe it = is true. The API may be stable, but the ops support sucks. From general-return-1454-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 18:58:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57872 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 18:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 18:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 13605 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:58:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13565 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:58:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13557 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 18:58:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:58:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:58:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 57827 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 18:58:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:58:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD1EDD6.8060004@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:58:30 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allen Wittenauer wrote: > That 0.20 is not 1.0 quality, no matter how hard people want to believe it is true. Allen, my question was, "regardless of the naming" should we try to merge all of the 0.20-based security patches to a branch in Apache's subversion? As for the naming, the major release number does not make a claim about quality or features, but rather about compatibility. 1.0 would presumably be the lowest quality and least featured release in the 1.x series, but everything in that series should be API compatible with 1.0. Every release in the 2.x series might not be compatible with 1.0. Point releases add features, dot releases add quality. So 1.0.1 would only improve quality, while 1.1.0 would add features while maintaining compatibility. Doug From general-return-1455-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 20:36:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88510 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 20:36:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 20:36:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27171 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:36:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27132 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:36:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27124 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:36:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:36:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1310.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:36:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 88410 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:35:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f203.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:35:56 +0000 Received: by iwn41 with SMTP id 41so7153261iwn.20 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.190.197 with SMTP id dj5mr148451ibb.58.1272054955529; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.152.206 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:35:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:35:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch From: Chris Douglas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please, let's not repeat the discussion on 0.20 as 1.0 in this thread. I oppose the immortality of the 0.20 branch for the same reasons I opposed it on common-dev. From a technical perspective, nothing has been more destructive to the momentum and focus of this project than the perpetual backporting and development on this branch. Yahoo, Cloudera, and Facebook have their reasons for building fortresses on the sands of 0.20, but Apache has a year of development beyond that. It's a dark, unmapped jungle at the moment, but what you propose will only exacerbate that problem by establishing a fourth settlement on that sad oasis. I vote no. Apache doesn't need to participate in the ridiculous exercise of porting 0.20 to 0.22. Why not support (and aid) Tom's effort to stabilize trunk? -C On Friday, April 23, 2010, Doug Cutting wrote: > Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > That 0.20 is not 1.0 quality, no matter how hard people want to believe i= t is true. > > > Allen, my question was, "regardless of the naming" should we try to merge= all of the 0.20-based security patches to a branch in Apache's subversion? > > As for the naming, the major release number does not make a claim about q= uality or features, but rather about compatibility. =A01.0 would presumably= be the lowest quality and least featured release in the 1.x series, but ev= erything in that series should be API compatible with 1.0. =A0Every release= in the 2.x series might not be compatible with 1.0. Point releases add fea= tures, dot releases add quality. =A0So 1.0.1 would only improve quality, wh= ile 1.1.0 would add features while maintaining compatibility. > > Doug > From general-return-1456-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 20:42:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90568 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 20:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 20:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 39323 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:42:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39279 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39271 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:42:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:42:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 90389 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:41:49 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:41:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD2060D.7060604@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:41:49 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris Douglas wrote: > Why not support (and aid) Tom's effort to stabilize trunk? I do support Tom's efforts and do not see these as mutually exclusive. Doug From general-return-1457-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 20:52:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95751 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 20:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 20:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 56333 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56271 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56263 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:52:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-74.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:52:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 95626 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:51:54 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:51:54 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:51:53 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Douglas wrote: > From a technical perspective, nothing has > been more destructive to the momentum and focus of this project than > the perpetual backporting and development on this branch. I'm not proposing any more back- or forward-porting than will be done anyway. I'm proposing we commit all the 0.20 security patches to a repo at Apache. This could be as simple as copying Y!'s github repo wholesale to a branch at Apache. Or, with a bit more effort, we can probably apply the patches from Jira in the right order. Otherwise, Cloudera, Facebook and others will have to duplicate this effort. Then bugfix patches and releases can be made against this repo rather than everyone having to assemble and maintain their own 0.20 security patchset from scratch. Everyone will be using this patchset for quite some time. Why shouldn't we share a repo that contains it? Doug From general-return-1458-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:31:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8270 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 12682 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12636 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12628 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:31:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:31:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:31:04 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so1276943ywh.5 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ursIC59jTCO8ghro7VIx5EWO5PZXOvvqqwBx3WCwStc=; b=DpZm5bt/Cf/31b86SHVdi8CWX0eKkQ6w6CfNtZofRyhzWfpViNux+tEa8r3h5xA2FA DqJ9OltKxmUHxzaFHbnM4PDOp+zsO/ZjIURkVLJi4v2JM+AnqkQbawNhp6z+++Kh9orh lBtC7BRgjGQX3pWI91huJMSTpw0qvHY4UxV+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BA+TNI8yFQouSFc+WNCWoLvYlkwiGtwxbiyscDezXS48hVLL+9Vy2xvBO6AjpdLBZx k8aYblx2bRJqsj5dcq0Zoq2zv/OphB8H27w1e8EejN8n3+Ik+Ot5NNzzZkax2L7uPUb/ MauR65b8i8ran3t9bxTZI7qjLFozq6Ku3Uvbw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.14.5 with SMTP id 5mr687549ybn.17.1272058243147; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.38.8 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:30:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:30:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd76242b7683c0484ee23e2 --000e0cd76242b7683c0484ee23e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I support Doug's idea whole-heartedly. The question that remains is "who gets to test and stabilize this new branch"? I am proposing that we designate a owner for this branch and it is the onus of the owner of this branch to test/stabilize that branch. thanks, dhruba On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Chris Douglas wrote: > >> From a technical perspective, nothing has >> been more destructive to the momentum and focus of this project than >> the perpetual backporting and development on this branch. >> > > I'm not proposing any more back- or forward-porting than will be done > anyway. I'm proposing we commit all the 0.20 security patches to a repo at > Apache. This could be as simple as copying Y!'s github repo wholesale to a > branch at Apache. Or, with a bit more effort, we can probably apply the > patches from Jira in the right order. Otherwise, Cloudera, Facebook and > others will have to duplicate this effort. Then bugfix patches and releases > can be made against this repo rather than everyone having to assemble and > maintain their own 0.20 security patchset from scratch. Everyone will be > using this patchset for quite some time. Why shouldn't we share a repo that > contains it? > > Doug > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd76242b7683c0484ee23e2-- From general-return-1459-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 23:03:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25195 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 23:03:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 80447 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80400 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80392 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:03:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 25032 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:02:59 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:02:59 +0000 Message-ID: <4BD22722.5060009@apache.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:02:58 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I support Doug's idea whole-heartedly. The question that remains is "who > gets to test and stabilize this new branch"? As a starting point, Y!'s distribution includes a patch list at: http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common/commits/yahoo-hadoop-0.20 Cloudera lists its patches in the tarball inside the source rpm: http://archive.cloudera.com/redhat/cdh/3/SRPMS/hadoop-0.20-0.20.2+228-1.src.rpm We could perhaps start with the intersection of these and vote on that. If there are patches missing from this list that you believe are well tested and critical to Facebook, then these could be nominated as well. We'd require a consensus vote on each patch. > I am proposing that we > designate a owner for this branch and it is the onus of the owner of this > branch to test/stabilize that branch. I'm happy to call votes on patch lists, merge patches to the branch, run unit tests and roll release candidates, although I'd love help. If we stick to patches and combinations of patches that folks are already testing elsewhere, then this should be a stable branch. The first release on this branch should be declared alpha until its tested in a variety of environments. Folks should of course not immediately put into production any release from this branch (or any other branch) without some testing of their own. If folks prefer to continue to use releases blessed by Y! or Cloudera, then we'd at least make the patch lists of those releases considerably shorter. This branch would simplify sharing of bugfixes even if we don't make releases from it, since it would already contain the patches common to most production environments. Doug From general-return-1460-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 05:38:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8500 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 05:38:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 05:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 31602 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31325 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31317 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:38:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1317.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 8475 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:38:08 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:38:08 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so4009772iwn.29 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:38:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.85 with SMTP id u21mr309421ibx.95.1272087487637; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.152.206 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD22722.5060009@apache.org> References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> <4BD22722.5060009@apache.org> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:38:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch From: Chris Douglas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I'm not proposing any more back- or forward-porting than will be done any= way. That's probably true for this release, but what about HDFS-200? With security and sync in 0.20, there is less motivation to move back to trunk, which has diverged significantly. Moving off of 0.20 will be a struggle without these supplements. With a weak trunk, the justifications that led to the current state will remain in force. > =A0Or, with a bit more effort, we can probably apply the patches from Jir= a in the right order. =A0Otherwise, Cloudera, Facebook and others will have= to duplicate this effort. Cloudera, Facebook, and others could also help to finish this work in trunk. Or clone from github if the need is dire. > Then bugfix patches and releases can be made against this repo rather tha= n everyone having to assemble and maintain their own 0.20 security patchset= from scratch. =A0Everyone will be using this patchset for quite some time.= =A0Why shouldn't we share a repo that contains it? Because trunk is the shared repository that contains the security work. And a working append. And dozens of smaller, but important features including the 1.0 APIs. Symlinks. Optimizations to the shuffle. Splittable bzip compression. Stability and scalability fixes to the NameNode and JobTracker. Unicorns and happiness. Stabilizing, packaging, and testing trunk is drudgery, but it can be shared= . I can see the value in restarting collaboration between major contributors by reestablishing a common branch, and 0.20 will probably be more successful in that respect, at least earlier. However, I continue to oppose sinking combined energy into 0.20 at the expense of trunk, for reasons already discussed at length. -C > Doug > From general-return-1461-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 04:47:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69380 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 04:47:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 04:47:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 49370 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 04:47:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49044 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 04:47:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49035 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 04:47:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 04:47:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 04:47:06 +0000 Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so210864gwj.35 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9ZZCO+m2aO2AvGr/1AeiAVUrhqGyfyQ7iP12Su/7WiM=; b=I4N1ZQFT7GtG9CnB27CziPPM9/Tyc00+OGjT5H6FfgqRakhZoda9bnVSWN9ujo/4Sz 9WJW5rFlX1qlPJHnD0ZOLatnVP2+wJ6NU62xItZOjFodBfmv1aFnp/4YX6twCnz5/BsG A5bvzut7kSZ92YuCN2LZ12F67xWI0K7qYKtBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Kxgqtg204qwR51ghQUK/MhRp0Wjfl7Fk0kgV+p6BaaLaN4chj09KmFZUcLeD0vOFN8 W47ha+cu3ziKyc5fcMqnTGsGSGmD+Uw3x8adiq0gIYRCETdl6RQcTJrqYgwckJz/Yuwa maFrHq90VBtfPt5NueQhhtp64Sc9ubzB6WiQc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.248.3 with SMTP id v3mr2399073ybh.82.1272170805622; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:46:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: jobclient.getFS throwing an NullPointerException From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All, After a reduce task, I would like to have a handle to DistributedFileSystem. We have the deprecated hadoop-site.xml instead of core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml. When I perform a jobclient.getFS() it throws a NullPointerException. I am not sure if the configuration is an issue. Any tips would be appreciated? --- Gautam From general-return-1462-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 19:11:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35583 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 19:11:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 19:11:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 8208 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:11:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8148 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8140 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 19:11:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:11:37 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so6466959gxk.11 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4TNZWtxSzBqUU75vtw3MZWgUQei5L0GpeFdTR+PNWPs=; b=ghzwjUkzO73k66LiZtEodAxaUnr3kiD6iBwaYI6oOyJ5ikaV9fxAq2Mgdjj3c8QJX0 85kvG9Z82Fn4ABK7l0wGWhoXAZ2+GHV4qVZwPzir2hwGdeMNaAQvVcnxU4VJm4BdP5WB MWaRn54tvftR30pwmXQxuclJEEZE1nfbngSMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u/0l1923OkhaSgJeStR26KVUKfzr2JuQvKstwOA8qTHPw86O2BHbfDjDWcuR+sxnL9 Zf2P14ZV5XhMsvF2xZEgpm+MULxWXCrVPLKc+VrWU6/1KQFv17v20kxYyGyUc7i/hpt7 v5OmkevIWGZQIwTy3zeerP0IBMFoCjDVU/mNI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.9.21 with SMTP id m21mr3483293ani.119.1272222676673; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.4.21 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: replace namenode From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello All, I have been testing hdfs and have been very happy. Currently, I run it on a 200 node cluster equating to 250TB :-). So far everything has been good. My question is I would like to replace my namenode to something more reliable. Is there an easy way to do this? I am thinking of rsycing the namenode metadata (not sure where it is, but I am hoping someone guide me to that) to the new node and have all datanode's conf/core-site.xml point to new node. That should be it, correct? TIA From general-return-1463-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 15:26:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34761 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 15:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 15:26:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 84950 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84869 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84861 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 15:26:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:26:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:26:19 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so9562151pzk.2 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:25:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m/5prcw+jqaZ8hHrr1k5U5DIvm8zCQ6ClwZQ86IY6Go=; b=vMGTzJE4SCefZHJBnI3i0hJ9/gR9uJcHmrcVKW7A81OI3NxlvQAk3dxgZeScZHAbNg /WgqDjXLcUESg7wiGoG3Euj4QmOio5S/5e1smE7tWeeR5h0oIXmSiuhuK/UrazLcBwOS EpSF6qGA5T4QE/afH9Y0C+US8qhxYich93Sd4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=x5IZ7F8Zkl1JePf5SqHncsJX6TB7R4caw0UJWM26Fjys+SuqM9G6UyTkjifzxq8x++ F9Vp22II7PJf9VQqJ2v8QNRpZkk1l5m5RyTDHxggfxRuBM1ZjcYaU2URaovF/l93atEx iCfqIzGhFqtGYK+KLmwoYL7QC7xKSE76r/wAk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.237.2 with SMTP id k2mr4422282wah.214.1272295558221; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:25:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I should take a look at Vaidya for performance analysis, but yes, inserting using LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE is got to be the fastest. My numbers show its atleast 9-10 times faster than the next mechanism. I am loading to an empty table, without much indexes; otherwise, I might need to disable indexing and re-enable indexing after the load data. I am yet to check out Hivo; and got a couple of questions. For using inload functionality of MySQL, I had to copy the results to local and sequentially loaded it to MYSQL. Does Hivo perform a parallel Load Data Local? Does the reducers perform this task upon close? That would mean multiple connections to the DB and could be faster. Thanks! --- Gautam On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > In general, you'll want to avoid tunneling permanent production code > over ssh tunnels. They're flaky and do not recover from network > interruption in any reasonable way. If you need to do this, a vpn is > the correct approach. Linux easily will do ipsec p2p tunnels that are > reasonably secure. If you really only have port 22 then I suppose > that's your only option but I really would reevaluate the security > policy. > > Either way, it's going to be slow due to the encryption overhead but > if it's a small amount of data, that may be fine. > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Gautam Singaraju > wrote: >> All, >> >> I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and >> push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a >> remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I >> tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom >> JDBC code from the reducers. >> >> Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there >> been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an >> expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. >> >> [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ >> --- >> Gautam Singaraju >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > From general-return-1464-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 15:27:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34901 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 15:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 15:27:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86156 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86083 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86075 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 15:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:27:06 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so8713210pwi.35 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gMpNK7LDpR3s1lKbp9cd0oS7r21vt64M20cX93pPr3w=; b=lPUL3rxu1QsfHXJOXS9wsRiPSBVYzWgmyUIlM2t3RdCfXoPsRcs7ljMqCXJbDZco9p Gn6g71ffuA4gBEKPjJcZ21rEuuXWvmtXu7vsOJiF1Z+qvs3+bK9YCmXXnFhXBiWdi0Fo 70BiNJ564+O1M+W0pTSJONk0V4sZWXq9glzl0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Oi06YW6KsmMj4PdAW31mlsQHygo3hKuKOvEgz2JCHMdykKKobqTFhV6ZT+rcXS+dYS XFRkePQs/qTjIDYx46ycjgauY7R/oxe/jNkEIby/ayzbX5B80BvKgv4LDzEg/U60QV2X jdMYZZQWgQwwiNojUxxwL2lW6wW7Jn/JZlyaA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.67.30 with SMTP id p30mr1934250wfa.154.1272295605368; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.19 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:26:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:26:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jobclient.getFS throwing an NullPointerException From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Figured it out, thanks! --- Gautam On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Gautam Singaraju wrote: > All, > > After a reduce task, I would like to have a handle to > DistributedFileSystem. We have the deprecated hadoop-site.xml instead > of core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml. When I perform a > jobclient.getFS() it throws a NullPointerException. > > I am not sure if the configuration is an issue. Any tips would be appreciated? > --- > Gautam > From general-return-1465-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 15:43:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43960 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 15:43:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 15:43:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 23619 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:43:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23566 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 15:43:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23558 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 15:43:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:43:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:43:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DD71BA4EE for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:43:06 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9kNgLLJvcYUV for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:42:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D4E1BA331 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:42:55 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1272901364.63208@3UFQFH87AGtPpNGI8IZmNA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3QFghcK017659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:42:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BD5B473.90807@apache.org> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:42:43 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3QFghcK017659 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > Y!'s developed extensive security features based on the 0.20 branch. The > 0.20 versions of the individual patches appear in Jira, but these have > not been committed to any branch in Apache's SVN. Y! has periodically > pushed out versions of these as Yahoo!'s Distribution of Hadoop at > github, and Cloudera is likely to make a 0.20-based distribution > including these as well. > > Shouldn't we commit these all to some 0.20-based branch at Apache? I'd > earlier (on common-dev) suggested we might start a 1.0 branch based on > 0.20, then add a 1.1 branch with the security patches. If that were > done, the 0.21 release could perhaps instead be called 1.2. But, > regardless of the naming, it would be good to have the 0.20 versions of > all of the security patches committed to a branch at Apache so that we > can make a release that includes them, patches can be targeted against > this branch, etc. > > What do others think? I'm biased as I don't have that much data in HDFS right now, but I'm mostly in favour of SVN_TRUNK as where things go, not adding new features to the existing stuff From general-return-1466-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 16:46:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68313 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 16:46:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 16:46:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29215 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 16:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29132 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 16:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29121 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 16:46:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611481BA682 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:46:07 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7Q61Mko0gSNa for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600A71BA2B8 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:57 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1272905145.79199@ADbWXsv9qU6NMasUkN8BTw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3QGjiX8018963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:45 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BD5C338.3030602@apache.org> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:44 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3QGjiX8018963 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> that brings up a couple of issues I've been thinking about now that workers can go to 6+ HDDs/node >> >> * a way to measure the distribution across disks, rather than just nodes. DfsClient doesn't provide enough info here yet. > > What should probably happen is that instead of throwing you to the file browser, clicking on a host from the live nodes page should probably put you on a "stats about this node" page. I don't want to do any of this by hand. I want machine readable content something can aggregate over time. > >> * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position stuff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just local disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. > > > Yup. Working with 8 drives per node, it is interesting to see how unbalanced the data gets after a while. [Luckily, we have MR tmp space segregated off so I'm sure it would be a lot worse if we didn't!] > > Someone should file a jira. :) Especially if someone else offers to fix it. From general-return-1467-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 16:54:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73761 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 16:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 16:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 38942 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 16:54:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38835 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 16:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38827 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 16:54:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:54:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:54:35 +0000 Received: from [10.73.145.24] (travelsoon-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.145.24]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3QGrkfM082614 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gIZmSE8UCr1hGb8Seae5tNZ9ThELfQ5HFQ0Ex7IIh+vxMJPtiNGypiI4W/GBl6ST Message-ID: <4BD5C516.3090408@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:53:42 -0700 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <4BD5B473.90807@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD5B473.90807@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I can't see any way in which staying mired in developing on 20 rather than trunk is beneficial to the long-term health of the project. 20.0 was released in late April, 2009 and we've not had a major release since then, which is hurting the project significantly. Packaging and testing a security-enabled release is very difficult, let me assure you, and will require a significant, concerted effort that would take away a huge number of cycles from releasing 21 - whatever form 21 takes - and fixing bugs on trunk. We're in the process of moving all the work we did on Y!'s 20 to trunk so that we can have a great 21 (&& 22). -jakob From general-return-1468-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 20:44:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18419 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 20:44:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 20:44:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:44:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2910 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2902 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 20:44:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:44:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:44:50 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so17305353qyk.20 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qbV/RENCRYouTWocnhgbF7dKxE9fW3Pyls2vgB99WeM=; b=wJIkj5oRa9OX9dmBiFMwsnXmZmNXJg9BTMke3FcL/iTY6FZ3c0woDXj8+pd/4YDMCw 11GZdVnggr3t/KFyVuSYzbRwtIPYtO+H4ahEZukFpJ7qikeNcb6vsoIL7H5x37NyxGhh C1D7rcMG3q9V5Mm4q15o3SAn1bi5rnJvwsc/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PU7IAgjg3JKimo17Q2ndtfymLkXMpXPiAst9LvGZ+afhjMO23qle1LAECe4V3LM5JH 2V4iAyJSklN3zpyhcE/gu+Bbk+TLlTu+3oXZ3Fu8wIyVPugDJy8q/vphWaVma1eMDWNS o41PyHwA1a9H3h79zHPA2ev5jeWsGO8gYoulE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.214.7 with SMTP id gy7mr5595963qcb.12.1272314669335; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.82.17 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:44:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: ANNOUNCE: Chukwa 0.4 released From: Ariel Rabkin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Chukwa team is pleased to announce the release of Chukwa 0.4.0, our second public release. Chukwa is a log collection framework designed to facilitate large-scale log storage and processing with Hadoop. Chukwa has been tested at scale and used in several production settings, and is reasonably robust and well behaved. - This release fixes many bugs, improves documentation, and adds several more collection tools, such as the ability to collect UDP packets. - There is one important backwards-incompatible change. Instead of separate scripts for starting Chukwa agents, collectors, etc, there is now a single bin/chukwa taking a mode parameter. See http://hadoop.apache.org/chukwa/docs/r0.4.0/ for an overview of Chukwa and http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/chukwa/ for download links. And feel free to email chukwa-user@hadoop.apache.org with any questions or concerns. --Ari -- Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com UC Berkeley Computer Science Department From general-return-1469-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 05:31:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78125 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 05:31:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 05:31:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 44750 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 05:31:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44491 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 05:31:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44483 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 05:31:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:31:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:31:35 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so18063854qyk.20 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:31:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.191.1 with SMTP id dk1mr6626819qcb.18.1272346274547; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.22.140 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:31:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: MR & Hadoop industry survey, make your voice heard From: John Kreisa To: general Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b85f6b9c9cf048531336e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b85f6b9c9cf048531336e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Greetings Hadoop community, We know there are many exciting uses of Hadoop out there in a wide range of industries and now there is an opportunity to make your voice heard. Leading industry analyst the 451 Group is running a brief survey where the purpose is to collect information on how enterprise IT organizations use MapReduce and IT management log search technologies. There are only 8 questions on this survey and one of the choices of MapReduce implementations is Hadoop. I wanted to make you aware of the survey and ask you to help make sure that Hadoop is represented by taking a few minutes to take part in it. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/D6QCV3W Cheers, John -- John Kreisa VP Marketing Cloudera phone: +1 (408) 425 7600 blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera web: www.cloudera.com --0016363b85f6b9c9cf048531336e-- From general-return-1470-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 21:17:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93130 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 21:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 21:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 92400 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 21:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92346 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 21:17:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92338 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 21:17:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:17:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:17:35 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:17:14 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:15:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] secure 0.20-based branch Thread-Index: AcrmTwGIRLd5JJRARPWlONBwHtpDTg== Message-ID: References: <4BD1DFEA.5020908@apache.org> <792D1884-3AF7-4087-AC78-B1872D895138@linkedin.com> <4BD20869.3060304@apache.org> <4BD22722.5060009@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> I'm not proposing any more back- or forward-porting than will be done an= yway. >>=20 >=20 > Because trunk is the shared repository that contains the security > work. And a working append. And dozens of smaller, but important > features including the 1.0 APIs. Symlinks. Optimizations to the > shuffle. Splittable bzip compression. Stability and scalability fixes > to the NameNode and JobTracker. Unicorns and happiness. >=20 I'm for anything that gets all the goodies above out in a release. I don't= care if they all get in one release or if its spread out over 2 or 3. Right now, about 1/4 of the above (e.g. happiness, but no unicorns) is in C= DH2/3. Trunk has stalled, getting new -- CORE -- features requires using = other branches.=20 Although I would like to see the changes that these other branches have in = apache's SVN, they belong in trunk. 0.20 is old already. Its the old, sta= ble branch now and new stuff should go into newer releases. I've been wait= ing for things like the Shuffle refactor (30% performance improvement for s= ome of my job flows) for a long time. Just because Y! is not going to upgrade their deployment past their branch = for a long time does not mean the rest of the community has to wait. I liv= ed on 0.19.2 in production until very recently -- it became a solid branch = without Y! or Facebook. Without the same testing muscle, it might take 1 o= r two more minor releases to stabilize, but the community's release schedul= e IMO desperately needs to become more independent of the biggest players. = =20 Trunk should be moved forward and incorporate Cloudera and Yahoo's improvem= ents aggressively. Its OK to have a 0.x.0 release that isn't completely st= able yet, or backed by the biggest users. It is important to incorporate = improvements made by productive contributors into actual releases in a time= ly fashion, or else those contributors will roll their own versions and eve= ntually diverge significantly from the community rather than wait to get va= lue from their work. > Stabilizing, packaging, and testing trunk is drudgery, but it can be shar= ed. >=20 > I can see the value in restarting collaboration between major > contributors by reestablishing a common branch, and 0.20 will probably > be more successful in that respect, at least earlier. However, I > continue to oppose sinking combined energy into 0.20 at the expense of > trunk, for reasons already discussed at length. -C >=20 I would love to see an apache release with new, useful features and enhance= ments. That could be a 0.20 with all or most of the Y! and Cloudera stuff = in there. However, if any such effort slows down progress on trunk -- forg= et it. Get a 0.21 or 0.22 out with whatever features are ready, and move t= he ball forward on trunk. We should not encourage 0.20 to live forever. = =20 0.21 and 0.22 should be releases that are compelling enough for Y!, Clouder= a, and anyone else with their own customizations to want to move to for the= ir own sake. >> Doug >>=20 From general-return-1471-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 15:36:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60929 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 15:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 15:36:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 21240 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:36:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21185 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21177 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 15:35:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:35:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.174] (HELO mail-iw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.223.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:35:54 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so6494886iwn.31 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:35:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6kPvPsLlATLHCgkmm9rZNQ0x9ZWAUeRmLAytVm/bAHI=; b=UA4rSP3eedXH8GkElSqx5+W2pLw3zHClNH+/z8Nw7PViBwyYcu+3ftexBfSgM6sft5 kxzQH9u3Wupv5OSS0IfOmFyrLaxgfXJC2u97xDlz1mbspwRN+spogPJ7GuA657g0WYom QNTB2LzOwryuQr0kmBc8zCMNCJo4ESYE+Vr6w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hK8IkPMnBEYs1yHz3OaBWXCX8rew62gqRSBlIVCl6RJ9yZGFFM62+P62v7S8vXo2V1 OjLdzBEON27Mtn9voj70Rpms88jNJaKSfsoMiuIliHHG6BSaUA3kqTQFiKxheMIexo8S QgURN4k3uLUcrjbgcTna6PO57zMo5mP+5mel4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.16 with SMTP id u16mr4543894wfh.217.1272468932797; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.211.14 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:32 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DBOutputFormat over SSH? From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cc65ba24dd04854dc215 --00504502cc65ba24dd04854dc215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Gautam, Answers inline. Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Gautam Singaraju < gautam.singaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > I should take a look at Vaidya for performance analysis, but yes, > inserting using LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE is got to be the fastest. My > numbers show its atleast 9-10 times faster than the next mechanism. I > am loading to an empty table, without much indexes; otherwise, I might > need to disable indexing and re-enable indexing after the load data. > > I am yet to check out Hivo; and got a couple of questions. For using > inload functionality of MySQL, I had to copy the results to local and > sequentially loaded it to MYSQL. Does Hivo perform a parallel Load > Data Local? Does the reducers perform this task upon close? That would > mean multiple connections to the DB and could be faster. > > yes, parallel load data local. HDFS files are loaded in parallel to the MySQL database. For efficiency, loading is in map only job. Number of mappers are determined by number of files. > Thanks! > --- > Gautam > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Eric Sammer > wrote: > > In general, you'll want to avoid tunneling permanent production code > > over ssh tunnels. They're flaky and do not recover from network > > interruption in any reasonable way. If you need to do this, a vpn is > > the correct approach. Linux easily will do ipsec p2p tunnels that are > > reasonably secure. If you really only have port 22 then I suppose > > that's your only option but I really would reevaluate the security > > policy. > > > > Either way, it's going to be slow due to the encryption overhead but > > if it's a small amount of data, that may be fine. > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Gautam Singaraju > > wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> I have a use-case where I need to crunch a large amount of data and > >> push to the results (comparatively a smaller set) to a mysql db at a > >> remote location. As per security concerns, only SSH ports are open. I > >> tried using Java Secure Channel [1] in combination with some custom > >> JDBC code from the reducers. > >> > >> Can anyone comment on the performance of DBOutputFormat? Have there > >> been any efforts to tunnel this through SSH? This is going to be an > >> expensive operation; any suggestions would be welcome. > >> > >> [1] http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ > >> --- > >> Gautam Singaraju > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Eric Sammer > > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > > twitter: esammer > > data: www.cloudera.com > > > --00504502cc65ba24dd04854dc215-- From general-return-1472-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 15:41:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63762 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 15:41:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 15:41:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 32636 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:41:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32570 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32562 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 15:41:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:41:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.211] (HELO qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:41:42 +0000 Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B1pK1e0050lTkoCAB3hPcP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:41:23 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B3hC1e0012SbwD58Q3hEDG; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:41:20 +0000 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <6C75A0AB-36E2-4E78-850E-F025140CE4F1@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we approve the Hadoop security logo? Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:41:10 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security- > logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1. With 4 +1's (including Eli's from the jira) the vote passes. Thanks, Owen From general-return-1473-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 16:26:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85018 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 16:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 16:26:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 97961 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 16:26:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97903 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 16:26:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97895 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 16:26:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.23.152] (HELO n1-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.23.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:26:43 +0000 Received: from [67.195.9.81] by n1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2010 16:26:19 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.97] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2010 16:26:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Apr 2010 16:26:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 569059.36010.bm@omp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 31385 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Apr 2010 16:26:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1272471979; bh=+cSMtXGzTrJ3/cn6982yHCW4ixwQhqg7ZGOPcscl2kc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZmY0HMFtwmdcIJcvJ4MHxxVz5mWwW83jI0lQDONULm/+q5vywX/SFKu9AELI9XAQNHX/3SB7qLGYDrbccDzulZkAJ034eco3Yya/4DcgP51PyBN55FyZavxGtBQBrN3B3gjJ8EePiEMGMTExzdOkBgTtT1GrjymTCgZIOUt4sO8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FOYjRTirIQFHsSxe8lnaDXqCcWGX79gpwO08TeDdnbP1CVtAl4IlqWFyTB2y1RrjbMJJe1TRSoEua1NzKNu6jcHXsfrBserR7y2e/6XV9sQbEwC0MjWVwFcWzJHQyhuiRrv/+r3NMMqlVJga6GxNmZgS21PdW2LVrDFXgd5xQTc=; Message-ID: <170889.24561.qm@web111809.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: FujhOfYVM1mU4yOeTZGrbA5R7wirovKCgKA0zun0k9IpAYr 8NKXI0EA6iH8GRHxkMIlpSbt41yLbAIWHDrMTpp9CHF0xA3cFLvIwaiF9M5d b1NLTVeCwSXi2idxiwwO8d0IYDqXES4DoglxTG2nmrMhV4dEnEZBIlg7CHqn kNKD8YQwpst5psNfHCdC638rXVTEKkFguRM7.trOH7TAnOxomUvzgHZD1fjj inIcXrjkB9FOMkpUTH2hVGDOD86QdCV74xUUm_nVh4beEyUvo1EnROOWtpv4 Ps30n4kQpxJp1IC5sv42fLGF.432X6uTgkiWVCEzEMxOp Received: from [198.144.195.34] by web111809.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:26:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.1.11 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:26:19 -0700 (PDT) From: A Anand Subject: Spreadsheet analytics product on Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1096905557-1272471979=:24561" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1096905557-1272471979=:24561 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Datameer recently announced the beta availability of their Data Analytics Solution (DAS) product which provides spreadsheet based analytics on Hadoop. Current participants in the beta program include leaders in security, financial services, telecommunications and internet research. To learn more, check out www.datameer.com. Ajay --0-1096905557-1272471979=:24561-- From general-return-1474-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:33:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99022 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 88573 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:33:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88536 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88528 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:33:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:33:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:33:06 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:32:46 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:31:23 -0700 Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir Thread-Topic: dfs.data.dir Thread-Index: Acrm+NCTosPNR3rdSMOQgjoEX0Gfug== Message-ID: References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> <4BD5C338.3030602@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD5C338.3030602@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>> that brings up a couple of issues I've been thinking about now that wor= kers can go to 6+ HDDs/node >>>=20 >>> * a way to measure the distribution across disks, rather than just node= s. DfsClient doesn't provide enough info here yet. >>=20 >> What should probably happen is that instead of throwing you to the file = browser, clicking on a host from the live nodes page should probably put yo= u on a "stats about this node" page. >=20 > I don't want to do any of this by hand. I want machine readable content=20 > something can aggregate over time. >=20 >>=20 >>> * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position s= tuff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just loca= l disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. >>=20 >>=20 >> Yup. Working with 8 drives per node, it is interesting to see how unbal= anced the data gets after a while. [Luckily, we have MR tmp space segregat= ed off so I'm sure it would be a lot worse if we didn't!] >>=20 >> Someone should file a jira. :) >=20 > Especially if someone else offers to fix it. >=20 Should be trivial to at least make the new block allocation choose which de= vice to allocate the block on with a weighted roulette algorithm instead of= round-robin. From general-return-1475-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 09:29:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27553 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 09:29:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 09:29:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 82699 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:29:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82540 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82526 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 09:29:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:29:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:29:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642BB7E3A for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:28:44 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FOnCwS+NZ6Uc for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:28:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE46B7E39 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:28:33 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1273138102.36808@+hWZzTFY0htn5DTX/6FkEw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o3T9SL6k022759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:28:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BD95145.8040204@apache.org> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:28:37 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> <4BD5C338.3030602@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o3T9SL6k022759 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Scott Carey wrote: > On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>> that brings up a couple of issues I've been thinking about now that workers can go to 6+ HDDs/node >>>> >>>> * a way to measure the distribution across disks, rather than just nodes. DfsClient doesn't provide enough info here yet. >>> What should probably happen is that instead of throwing you to the file browser, clicking on a host from the live nodes page should probably put you on a "stats about this node" page. >> I don't want to do any of this by hand. I want machine readable content >> something can aggregate over time. >> >>>> * a way to triger some rebalancing on a single node, to say "position stuff more fairly". You don't need to worry about network traffic, just local disk load and CPU time, so it should be simpler. >>> >>> Yup. Working with 8 drives per node, it is interesting to see how unbalanced the data gets after a while. [Luckily, we have MR tmp space segregated off so I'm sure it would be a lot worse if we didn't!] >>> >>> Someone should file a jira. :) >> Especially if someone else offers to fix it. >> > > Should be trivial to at least make the new block allocation choose which device to allocate the block on with a weighted roulette algorithm instead of round-robin. > I'd go for another plugin point with the default impl being round-robin, let people come up with other strategies, and add a way from DfsClient to measure distribution. Other strategies could use specific knowledge about the disks -are they raided, can you hot swap, is the disk playing up, etc, etc, feature creep that I encourage people to explore. From general-return-1476-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 09:58:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35503 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 09:58:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 09:58:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 34471 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:58:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34122 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34114 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 09:58:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:58:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:58:27 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so3683377pxi.35 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:58:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.87.2 with SMTP id p2mr5163300wfl.323.1272535085121; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.16 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:58:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD95145.8040204@apache.org> References: <4BD04400.90800@apache.org> <51FEB071-B163-4B01-A08A-EB4DD9645923@linkedin.com> <4BD5C338.3030602@apache.org> <4BD95145.8040204@apache.org> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:58:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.data.dir From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c884b683c504855d2953 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5c884b683c504855d2953 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I'd go for another plugin point with the default impl being round-robin, > let people come up with other strategies, and add a way from DfsClient to > measure distribution. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1120 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1121 --000e0cd5c884b683c504855d2953-- From general-return-1477-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 30 01:14:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81023 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2010 01:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2010 01:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 70054 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2010 01:14:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69446 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2010 01:14:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69020 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2010 01:14:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:14:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:14:08 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o3U1DcF2011620; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=NAkHDklL2gCG+aQjym5QMLJG4SkRDK2DCcBa14qYy006h7l+tPqmBAzREaw+dHCI Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:13:37 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:13:36 -0700 Subject: Hadoop Summit - Call for Presentations Extended! Thread-Topic: Hadoop Summit - Call for Presentations Extended! Thread-Index: AcroAlvHuwAPMgtuR6quSXWd0pEzwA== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE9F24798@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE9F24798SP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE9F24798SP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi The call for presentations for Hadoop summit has been extended until *May 1= 0th* Leverage this extended opportunity to share your experience on Hadoop and s= ubmit abstracts here: *http://developer.yahoo.com/events/hadoopsummit2010/presentationguidelines.= html* Dekel --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE9F24798SP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-1478-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 30 19:05:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13462 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2010 19:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Apr 2010 19:05:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 5447 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2010 19:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5235 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2010 19:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38641 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2010 17:59:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hemanth Yamijala as new member of Apache Hadoop PMC Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:59:23 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache Hadoop PMC as voted to make Hemanth Yamijala a member of the PMC. Congratulations Hemanth! Thanks again for all your valuable contributions, we look forward to more from you! Arun From general-return-3-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 03 14:24:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 36762 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 14:24:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 14:24:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 73048 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 14:24:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73033 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 14:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73020 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2008 14:24:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:24:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [121.0.17.65] (HELO smtp.alibaba-inc.com) (121.0.17.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:23:10 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,742,1204473600"; d="scan'208";a="20326642" Subject: question about bin/hadoop namenode -format From: Yi Zhao To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:25:27 +0800 Message-Id: <1215095127.3384.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org when I execute the command "bin/hadoop namenode -format" get the message below: 08/07/03 22:22:03 INFO dfs.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = zhaoyi-laptop/127.0.0.1 STARTUP_MSG: args = [-format] ************************************************************/ Re-format filesystem in /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/name ? (Y or N) y Format aborted in /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/name 08/07/03 22:22:08 INFO dfs.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at zhaoyi-laptop/127.0.0.1 ************************************************************/ My slave is localhost My master is localhost I can ssh localhost without password. what wrong with it??? any help is appreciate; regards, Yi From general-return-4-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 03 15:01:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 49213 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2008 15:01:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2008 15:01:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 40394 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 15:01:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40375 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2008 15:01:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40364 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2008 15:01:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:01:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.17.190.200 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of enis.soz.nutch@gmail.com) Received: from [209.17.190.200] (HELO mail.ortakdns.com) (209.17.190.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:00:15 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.15] (unknown [85.105.135.220]) by mail.ortakdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0854C52C001 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:05:22 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <486CE990.8000805@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:00:32 +0300 From: Enis Soztutar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: question about bin/hadoop namenode -format References: <1215095127.3384.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1215095127.3384.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org you should you uppercase Y : ) Yi Zhao wrote: > when I execute the command "bin/hadoop namenode -format" get the message > below: > > 08/07/03 22:22:03 INFO dfs.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host = zhaoyi-laptop/127.0.0.1 > STARTUP_MSG: args = [-format] > ************************************************************/ > Re-format filesystem in /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/name ? (Y or N) y > Format aborted in /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/name > 08/07/03 22:22:08 INFO dfs.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at zhaoyi-laptop/127.0.0.1 > ************************************************************/ > > My slave is localhost > My master is localhost > I can ssh localhost without password. > > what wrong with it??? > > any help is appreciate; > > regards, > Yi > > > From general-return-5-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 04 06:16:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 17550 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 06:16:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 06:16:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 75411 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2008 06:16:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75394 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2008 06:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75383 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2008 06:16:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:16:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [121.0.17.65] (HELO smtp.alibaba-inc.com) (121.0.17.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:15:08 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,300,1212336000"; d="scan'208";a="20440106" Subject: can't find any datanode after start-all From: Yi Zhao To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <486CE990.8000805@gmail.com> References: <1215095127.3384.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <486CE990.8000805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:17:27 +0800 Message-Id: <1215152247.3257.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi, all. when I try to setup a hadoop enviroment which have one master and one slave master: localhost slave: 10.62.164.60 after start-all.sh, I got the information from http://localhost:50070/dfshealth.jsp as "There are no datanodes in the cluster" any help ia appreciated, thanks:D my hadoop-site.xml is is below: ------------------------------------ fs.default.name localhost:7770 mapred.job.tracker localhost:7771 hadoop.tmp.dir /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/tmp dfs.name.dir /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/name dfs.data.dir /home/zhaoyi/devel/hadoop/fs/data dfs.replication 1 From general-return-6-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 04 13:45:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 67955 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2008 13:45:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2008 13:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 25199 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2008 13:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25179 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2008 13:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25168 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2008 13:45:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:45:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [121.0.17.65] (HELO smtp.alibaba-inc.com) (121.0.17.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:44:53 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,302,1212336000"; d="scan'208";a="71266548" Subject: how to disperse the data uniformly? From: Yi Zhao To: general Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:47:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1215179234.26802.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have two datanode as below: 10.62.136.10 10.62.136.11 one namenode below: 10.62.136.10 master: 10.62.136.10 salves: 10.62.136.10 10.62.136.11 when I put a file 600M and a file 20M into dfs, I found that all data is centralized in one datanode!! how to disperse all the data to all datanode uniformly? thanks. my hadoop-site.xml is: ------------------------------ fs.default.name 10.62.142.62:7770 the name of the default file system, either the literal string "local" or a host:port for DFS. mapred.job.tracker 10.62.142.62:7771 the host and port that MapReduce job tracker runs at. if "local", then jobs are run in-process as a single map and reduce task. hadoop.tmp.dir /home/kongming/devel/hadoop/tmp a base for other temporary directories. dfs.name.dir /home/kongming/devel/hadoop/fs/name determines where on the local filesystem the DFS name node should store the name table. if this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the name table is replicated in all of the directories, for redundancy. dfs.data.dir /home/kongming/devel/hadoop/fs/data determines where on the local filesystem on DFS data node should store its blocks. if this is a comma-delimited list of directories, then data will be stored in all named directories, typically on different devices. derectories that do not exist are ignored. dfs.replication 1 default block replication. the actual number of replications can be specified when the file is created. the default is used if replication is not specified in create time From general-return-7-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 05 19:14:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 16277 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2008 19:14:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2008 19:14:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 55781 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2008 19:14:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55763 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2008 19:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55752 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2008 19:14:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:14:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:13:41 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m65JDmFc004106 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 15:13:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m65JDb3K004090 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 15:13:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: how to disperse the data uniformly? Date: 05 Jul 2008 15:13:37 -0400 X-Mailer: Prayer v1.0.16 X-Originating-IP: [70.56.213.162] In-Reply-To: <1215179234.26802.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <1215179234.26802.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_RELAY_NODNS,J_CHICKENPOX_44, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.4 for starters, you should probably change your replication value to=20 something other than 1, it kinda defeats the purpose of a parallel=20 distributed file system otherwise. What version of hadoop are you running?= =20 you should just be able to run the command $bin/hadoop balancer=20 to get the nodes balanced. However I don't remember what the tolerance=20 value on the balancer is for the generic hadoop-default.xml file is. Since= =20 you only have 620MB on the cluster, then it might be within hadoop's range= =20 of okay data distribution. Run the balancer first and see what happens\ - Grant On Jul 4 2008, Yi Zhao wrote: >I have two datanode as below: >10.62.136.10 >=EF=BB=BF10.62.136.11 >one namenode below: >10.62.136.10 >master: >=EF=BB=BF10.62.136.10 >salves: >=EF=BB=BF10.62.136.10 >=EF=BB=BF10.62.136.11 > >when I put a file 600M and a file 20M into dfs, I found that all data is >centralized in one datanode!! > >how to disperse all the data to all datanode uniformly? > >thanks. > >my hadoop-site.xml is: >------------------------------ > > > > > > >=09 >=09=09fs.default.name >=09=0910.62.142.62:7770 >=09=09the name of the default file system, either the literal >string "local" or a host:port for DFS. >=09 >=09 >=09=09mapred.job.tracker >=09=0910.62.142.62:7771 >=09=09the host and port that MapReduce job tracker runs at. i= f >"local", then jobs are run in-process as a single map and reduce >task. >=09 >=09 >=09=09hadoop.tmp.dir >=09=09/home/kongming/devel/hadoop/tmp >=09=09a base for other temporary directories. >=09 >=09 >=09=09dfs.name.dir >=09=09/home/kongming/devel/hadoop/fs/name >=09=09determines where on the local filesystem the DFS name >node should store the name table. if this is a comma-delimited list of >directories then the name table is replicated in all of the directories, >for redundancy. >=09 >=09 >=09=09dfs.data.dir >=09=09/home/kongming/devel/hadoop/fs/data >=09=09determines where on the local filesystem on DFS data no= de >should store its blocks. if this is a comma-delimited list of >directories, then data will be stored in all named directories, >typically on different devices. derectories that do not exist are >ignored. >=09 >=09 >=09=09dfs.replication >=09=091 >=09=09default block replication. the actual number of >replications can be specified when the file is created. the default is >used if replication is not specified in create time >=09 > > --=20 Grant Mackey UCF Researcher Eng. III Rm238 From general-return-8-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 14 10:11:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 36788 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2008 10:11:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2008 10:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 84212 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 10:11:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84172 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2008 10:11:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84151 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2008 10:11:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:11:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [121.0.17.65] (HELO smtp.alibaba-inc.com) (121.0.17.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:10:40 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,358,1212336000"; d="scan'208";a="21830280" Subject: how to distribute the data to all the datanodes? From: Yi Zhao To: general Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:12:12 +0800 Message-Id: <1216030332.3992.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi, all I have a hadoop cluster which have one master and three datanodes. I want to put a local file about 128M intpu hdfs, I have set the block-size to 10M when I set the replication to 0, I found that all the data distributed to the node which I execute the command 'bin/hadoop dfs -put file.gz input', so this node's disk space is used about 128M, but other nodes has no disk space used. when I set the replication to 3, I found that every nodes have the same data, so every nodes is about 128M disk space used. what should I do? I'm using hadoop-0.15.2. any one can help me? thanks. From general-return-9-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 15 17:30:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 77023 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2008 17:30:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2008 17:30:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11571 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2008 17:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11530 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2008 17:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11519 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2008 17:30:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:30:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:29:15 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6FHTRQ8026540 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m6FHTRlZ026538 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:29:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: how to distribute the data to all the datanodes? Date: 15 Jul 2008 13:29:26 -0400 X-Mailer: Prayer v1.0.16 X-Originating-IP: [128.165.72.17] In-Reply-To: <1216030332.3992.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <1216030332.3992.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FH_RELAY_NODNS,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.4 I'm failing to see your question. If you only want one copy of the data=20 stored, but you want the 128MB to be replicated over your data nodes, then= =20 you need to set the replication factor to 1. I'm surprised that it let you= =20 set the factor to 0. IF you were to set the replication value any higher than 1, then multiple= =20 copies would exist, for redundancy, and would be distributed across the=20 three nodes. hope this helps - Grant On Jul 14 2008, Yi Zhao wrote: >hi, all >I have a hadoop cluster which have one master and three datanodes. > >I want to put a local file about 128M intpu hdfs, I have set the >block-size to 10M > >when I set the replication to 0, >I found that all the data distributed to the node which I execute the >command 'bin/hadoop dfs -put file.gz input', so this node's disk space >is used about 128M, but other nodes has no disk space used. > >when I set the replication to 3, >I found that every nodes have the same data, so every nodes is about >128M disk space used. > >what should I do? =EF=BB=BFI'm using hadoop-0.15.2. > >any one can help me? > >thanks. > --=20 Grant Mackey UCF Researcher Eng. III Rm238 From general-return-10-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 24 07:59:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 26607 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2008 07:59:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 07:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 57923 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 07:59:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57902 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 07:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57886 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2008 07:59:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:59:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [210.150.84.113] (HELO connecty.co.jp) (210.150.84.113) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:58:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 24818 invoked by SAV 20080723.038 by uid 0); 24 Jul 2008 16:58:25 +0900 X-Authentication: hideki.kajiwara was authenticated by 210.150.84.113 at 24 Jul 2008 16:58:25 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO connecty.co.jp) (124.25.242.126) by ps27.suite2.arena.ne.jp (210.150.84.113) with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 16:58:25 +0900 From: Hideki KAJIWARA To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: tomoharu.fujita@connecty.co.jp Subject: redundant configuration of the namenode Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:58:17 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary-bqsQeP5FSnJRtWaOIURmd" X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 4.83 (WinNT,501) Message-Id: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary-bqsQeP5FSnJRtWaOIURmd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Mail message body It thinks about the redundant configuration of the name node that used keepalived (active/standby). (Refer to attached file redundant.gif and configuration file hadoop-site.xml. ) The NFS mount does the directory "/dfs/name" on the standby machine to " /dfs/namerep" set to dfs.name.dir in the configuration file. As a result, it thinks about making of file system metadata tedious. It became a result like attached file result.gif, and the file was not complete though the failover had been executed while writing the data of 100MB by using the sample program. Hereafter, reproduction procedure. 1.The sample program is executed. java sample.HadoopWriteToDFS 104857600 /dfs/users/kajiwara/test.data 2.It is kill as for namenode process of the active machine. (Then, start-dfs.sh starts on the standby machine. ) After a while, the file is not complete as the above-mentioned though the command ends normally. I want you to teach if there is a method of solving above-mentioned issue. H.KAJIWARA hideki.kajiwara@connecty.co.jp --Boundary-bqsQeP5FSnJRtWaOIURmd Content-Type: text/xml; charset=us-ascii; name="hadoop-site.xml" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hadoop-site.xml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIj8+DQo8Y29uZmlndXJhdGlvbj4NCiAgICA8cHJvcGVydHk+ DQogICAgICAgIDxuYW1lPmZzLmxpc3Rlbi5hZGRyZXNzPC9uYW1lPg0KICAgICAgICA8dmFs dWU+MC4wLjAuMDo5MDAwPC92YWx1ZT4NCiAgICA8L3Byb3BlcnR5Pg0KICAgIDxwcm9wZXJ0 eT4NCiAgICAgICAgPG5hbWU+ZGZzLm5hbWUuZGlyPC9uYW1lPg0KPCEtLWZvciBhY3RpdmUg TmFtZW5vZGUtLT4NCiAgICAgICAgPHZhbHVlPi9kZnMvbmFtZSwvZGZzL25hbWVyZXA8L3Zh bHVlPg0KPCEtLWZvciBzdGFuZGJ5IE5hbWVub2RlDQogICAgICAgIDx2YWx1ZT4vZGZzL25h bWU8L3ZhbHVlPg0KLS0+DQogICAgICAgIDxkZXNjcmlwdGlvbj5EZXRlcm1pbmVzIHdoZXJl IG9uIHRoZSBsb2NhbCBmaWxlc3lzdGVtIHRoZSBERlMgbmFtZSBub2RlDQogICAgICAgIHNo b3VsZCBzdG9yZSB0aGUgbmFtZSB0YWJsZS4gIElmIHRoaXMgaXMgYSBjb21tYS1kZWxpbWl0 ZWQgbGlzdA0KICAgICAgICBvZiBkaXJlY3RvcmllcyB0aGVuIHRoZSBuYW1lIHRhYmxlIGlz IHJlcGxpY2F0ZWQgaW4gYWxsIG9mIHRoZQ0KICAgICAgICBkaXJlY3RvcmllcywgZm9yIHJl ZHVuZGFuY3kuIDwvZGVzY3JpcHRpb24+DQogICAgPC9wcm9wZXJ0eT4NCiAgICA8cHJvcGVy dHk+DQogICAgICAgIDxuYW1lPmZzLmRlZmF1bHQubmFtZTwvbmFtZT4NCiAgICAgICAgPHZh bHVlPmhkZnM6Ly9kZnMtbWFzdGVyOjkwMDA8L3ZhbHVlPg0KICAgICAgICA8ZGVzY3JpcHRp b24+VGhlIG5hbWUgb2YgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0uICBBIFVSSSB3aG9zZQ0K ICAgICAgICBzY2hlbWUgYW5kIGF1dGhvcml0eSBkZXRlcm1pbmUgdGhlIEZpbGVTeXN0ZW0g aW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24uICBUaGUNCiAgICAgICAgdXJpJ3Mgc2NoZW1lIGRldGVybWluZXMg dGhlIGNvbmZpZyBwcm9wZXJ0eSAoZnMuU0NIRU1FLmltcGwpIG5hbWluZw0KICAgICAgICB0 aGUgRmlsZVN5c3RlbSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBjbGFzcy4gIFRoZSB1cmkncyBhdXRob3Jp dHkgaXMgdXNlZCB0bw0KICAgICAgICBkZXRlcm1pbmUgdGhlIGhvc3QsIHBvcnQsIGV0Yy4g Zm9yIGEgZmlsZXN5c3RlbS48L2Rlc2NyaXB0aW9uPg0KICAgIDwvcHJvcGVydHk+DQogICAg PHByb3BlcnR5Pg0KICAgICAgICA8bmFtZT5kZnMuZGF0YS5kaXI8L25hbWU+DQogICAgICAg IDx2YWx1ZT4vZGZzL2V4cG9ydDwvdmFsdWU+DQogICAgICAgIDxkZXNjcmlwdGlvbj5EZXRl cm1pbmVzIHdoZXJlIG9uIHRoZSBsb2NhbCBmaWxlc3lzdGVtIGFuIERGUyBkYXRhIG5vZGUN CiAgICAgICAgc2hvdWxkIHN0b3JlIGl0cyBibG9ja3MuICBJZiB0aGlzIGlzIGEgY29tbWEt ZGVsaW1pdGVkDQogICAgICAgIGxpc3Qgb2YgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMsIHRoZW4gZGF0YSB3aWxs IGJlIHN0b3JlZCBpbiBhbGwgbmFtZWQNCiAgICAgICAgZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMsIHR5cGljYWxs eSBvbiBkaWZmZXJlbnQgZGV2aWNlcy4NCiAgICAgICAgRGlyZWN0b3JpZXMgdGhhdCBkbyBu b3QgZXhpc3QgYXJlIGlnbm9yZWQuDQogICAgICAgIDwvZGVzY3JpcHRpb24+DQogICAgPC9w cm9wZXJ0eT4NCiAgICA8cHJvcGVydHk+DQogICAgICAgIDxuYW1lPmRmcy5yZXBsaWNhdGlv bjwvbmFtZT4NCiAgICAgICAgPHZhbHVlPjI8L3ZhbHVlPg0KICAgICAgICA8ZGVzY3JpcHRp b24+RGVmYXVsdCBibG9jayByZXBsaWNhdGlvbi4NCiAgICAgICAgVGhlIGFjdHVhbCBudW1i ZXIgb2YgcmVwbGljYXRpb25zIGNhbiBiZSBzcGVjaWZpZWQgd2hlbiB0aGUgZmlsZSBpcyBj cmVhdGVkLg0KICAgICAgICBUaGUgZGVmYXVsdCBpcyB1c2VkIGlmIHJlcGxpY2F0aW9uIGlz IG5vdCBzcGVjaWZpZWQgaW4gY3JlYXRlIHRpbWUuDQogICAgICAgIDwvZGVzY3JpcHRpb24+ DQogICAgPC9wcm9wZXJ0eT4NCiAgICA8cHJvcGVydHk+DQogICAgICAgIDxuYW1lPmRmcy5w ZXJtaXNzaW9ucy5zdXBlcmdyb3VwPC9uYW1lPg0KICAgICAgICA8dmFsdWU+ZGZzPC92YWx1 ZT4NCiAgICAgICAgPGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uPlRoZSBuYW1lIG9mIHRoZSBncm91cCBvZiBzdXBl ci11c2Vycy48L2Rlc2NyaXB0aW9uPg0KICAgIDwvcHJvcGVydHk+DQoNCjwhLS1mb3IgTWFw UmVkdWNlLS0+DQogICAgPHByb3BlcnR5Pg0KICAgICAgICA8bmFtZT5tYXByZWQuam9iLnRy YWNrZXI8L25hbWU+DQogICAgICAgIDx2YWx1ZT5kZnMtbWFzdGVyOjEwMDAwPC92YWx1ZT4N CiAgICAgICAgPGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uPlRoZSBob3N0IGFuZCBwb3J0IHRoYXQgdGhlIE1hcFJl ZHVjZSBqb2IgdHJhY2tlciBydW5zDQogICAgICAgIGF0LiAgSWYgImxvY2FsIiwgdGhlbiBq b2JzIGFyZSBydW4gaW4tcHJvY2VzcyBhcyBhIHNpbmdsZSBtYXANCiAgICAgICAgYW5kIHJl ZHVjZSB0YXNrLg0KICAgICAgICA8L2Rlc2NyaXB0aW9uPg0KICAgIDwvcHJvcGVydHk+DQog ICAgPHByb3BlcnR5Pg0KICAgICAgICA8bmFtZT5tYXByZWQuc3lzdGVtLmRpcjwvbmFtZT4N CiAgICAgICAgPHZhbHVlPi9tYXByZWQvc3lzdGVtPC92YWx1ZT4NCiAgICAgICAgPGRlc2Ny aXB0aW9uPlRoZSBzaGFyZWQgZGlyZWN0b3J5IHdoZXJlIE1hcFJlZHVjZSBzdG9yZXMgY29u dHJvbCBmaWxlcy4NCiAgICAgICAgPC9kZXNjcmlwdGlvbj4NCiAgICA8L3Byb3BlcnR5Pg0K PC9jb25maWd1cmF0aW9uPg0K --Boundary-bqsQeP5FSnJRtWaOIURmd-- From general-return-11-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 24 09:17:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 98098 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 80259 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80209 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80198 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2008 09:17:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:17:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dynaturtle.cai@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.185] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:16:08 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1476474tid.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=jhax1/nq4pneuJeVzwEtvQNgpBHl0FMnNiWipWUI32Q=; b=jrQ+lRQG5tI6Ib+y8JXWuOA72UMuqGlVjrvBq54Coa9EXlLxIlnQor4COTVKEQE4S9 wITXuHyK8hdWfqS1q6sOv+EFHcImMkuJCpgolEpmIP/Lr31CNa/ur3IXYB7uRVVnezIw Q5uLiJfaMYCaWbgK/MK+qp45R16ggUFIf+vLw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=OgQUW73LYgx6hhiBLtXOZsw8HFRRvrQ5lfg/o+9SIcdw3dd19ZqNBLg3r1yAj6FNUo HxTHW2nuuK799/Tcm0t76T6uES1aTydoZavY3ZSnWK3UfNTUY0FcyL6qR68K/NY9Qb1n LTEtbJjD9uFmMYVVre+tpIOws03lK7KbjAlM8= Received: by 10.110.47.17 with SMTP id u17mr8495tiu.49.1216890975119; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.49.13 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <448f7bd20807240216t1cf71609ve766e95112357553@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:16:15 +0800 From: "Cai Xiao(dynaturtle)" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Can anyone explain how to use hadoop plugin for eclipse? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_32719_11809156.1216890975161" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_32719_11809156.1216890975161 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I am new to hadoop. And could anyone tell me how I can use hadoop eclipse plugin? I have troubled with how to use it. -- Department of Spatial Information Science&Technology, School of Earth&Space Science, Peking University ADD: Room 3028, Building 46, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China Zip Code: 100871 ------=_Part_32719_11809156.1216890975161-- From general-return-12-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 24 09:35:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 19543 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2008 09:35:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 09:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2559 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 09:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2510 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 09:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2499 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2008 09:35:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:35:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thopham.asnet@gmail.com designates 72.14.246.241 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.246.241] (HELO ag-out-0708.google.com) (72.14.246.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:34:38 +0000 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 9so15852135agd.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:35:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZB2CPDosK2gQ/kntvnMacicLcws3XQ1P10OHm2T1XzE=; b=vjHbgyJbsIYmVEUjzZGBtmx7xjTvl2POZNECBWIu0EU5hmRGZ8wKcxa3KIHKUkVhdU 6bAPtpiNhziwJditHdw+kmZ2ohX2l+YmmntPwu+EjT9JzwJCpkk1VKDCAW5aKguIiMJh HIAaT0e4D0uxZXojyiDK+/pF+C70AfQryBryo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MIisSlLZiPwR+X+RKYHhZlE7D3w6xBepFaynzVAHIMrofBm6ucQyvmWvmaFQRpToSW 0akSknOyQpbFtcedHsY6+BjNdJfN9hjhPg67Sui6oQuodS490Z0vivgckiPeBfGH6Mhp cCF1qSFDniMIoVC6FKBQNXswngE2NeIxCqImc= Received: by 10.110.41.17 with SMTP id o17mr53177tio.18.1216892101590; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.11? ( [117.2.89.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm17831409tib.1.2008.07.24.02.34.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48884C8E.5020800@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:34:06 +0700 From: "thopham.asnet" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Can anyone explain how to use hadoop plugin for eclipse? References: <448f7bd20807240216t1cf71609ve766e95112357553@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <448f7bd20807240216t1cf71609ve766e95112357553@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Cai Xiao, You should do the steps below: 1. Open the path $HADOOP_HOME/contrib/eclipse-plugin, you will find a hadoop plugin for eclipse. Copy this .jar file to plugin folder of Eclipse. 2. Start Eclipse, select Windows\Preferences, then select Hadoop Map/Reduce node, you have to point to the root directory of Hadoop installation. 3. Restart Eclipse 4. Open Map/Reduce perspective in Eclipse 5. Create a new Map/Reduce server location by the instruction of the dialog. 6. Start your HDFS server and Map/Reduce master 7. Now, you can browse HDFS directory and submit your job to Map/Reduce server Good luck and have fun, Ps: Don't forget setting necessary environment variables. Best regards, Tho Pham Cai Xiao(dynaturtle) wrote: > I am new to hadoop. And could anyone tell me how I can use hadoop eclipse > plugin? > I have troubled with how to use it. > From general-return-13-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 24 10:15:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 40574 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2008 10:15:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2008 10:15:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 54507 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 10:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54481 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2008 10:15:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54470 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2008 10:15:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:15:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dynaturtle.cai@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.184] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:14:39 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1491975tid.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:15:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Tv4UOh9Rvtdn5dgsqRHmxzp7VX/r7UONsw4zHz+h9Hw=; b=itsF4pSJiFGsI69UiYjREs385bEd4MsbFu+qlKA1byT7hWVhf3Vo7ZxU3WpYym+7pt 7URv50oy5nxHgsmE2ikp5UQnf11xxD4UwmMUWle9SrTjDI9Ugod31Ek85W4eo7VxPhWE edej5JxVw4dofRpm6evsk517TXKcaGGsLcZsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=gz3Ox3LyMuj+B9WDIaSOxwX6kWrubMLIEEpzXiL6HcR/hblrNARHTe4BofTKZV/WfR yofyXXHI/epgCDrFI40VusE5JuP8TMZpe12xtLAvqlYNAfQIdUinXyS2t4nCvnXu5RYu XgVHZ0SB6YvWWY2GaKpZZQzeUu1oJggh56iaM= Received: by 10.110.46.3 with SMTP id t3mr77855tit.33.1216894502913; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.49.13 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <448f7bd20807240315y55a5dd22v196586d2812308ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:15:02 +0800 From: "Cai Xiao(dynaturtle)" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Can anyone explain how to use hadoop plugin for eclipse? In-Reply-To: <48884C8E.5020800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36684_11034478.1216894502961" References: <448f7bd20807240216t1cf71609ve766e95112357553@mail.gmail.com> <48884C8E.5020800@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_36684_11034478.1216894502961 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, Tho Pham, Thanks for your nice instruction. However, I still have some problems when it comes step5 my server info is as following: hostname: cadev18.asc.cnz.alimama.com installation directory: hadoop username: cloud15 And I have set my map/reduce master as: cadev18.asc.cnz.alimama.com my user name as: cloud15 And left other parameters as default. However, the server is not correctly connected. Eclipse cannot read the directory correctly. So can you give me any suggestin? Is there any other parameter I have to set. Thanks Regards Xiao On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:34 PM, thopham.asnet wrote: > Hey Cai Xiao, > You should do the steps below: > > 1. Open the path $HADOOP_HOME/contrib/eclipse-plugin, you will find a > hadoop plugin for eclipse. Copy this .jar file to plugin folder of Eclipse. > 2. Start Eclipse, select Windows\Preferences, then select Hadoop Map/Reduce > node, you have to point to the root directory of Hadoop installation. > 3. Restart Eclipse > 4. Open Map/Reduce perspective in Eclipse > 5. Create a new Map/Reduce server location by the instruction of the > dialog. > 6. Start your HDFS server and Map/Reduce master > 7. Now, you can browse HDFS directory and submit your job to Map/Reduce > server > > Good luck and have fun, > > Ps: Don't forget setting necessary environment variables. > > Best regards, > Tho Pham > > > Cai Xiao(dynaturtle) wrote: > >> I am new to hadoop. And could anyone tell me how I can use hadoop eclipse >> plugin? >> I have troubled with how to use it. >> >> > > -- Department of Spatial Information Science&Technology, School of Earth&Space Science, Peking University ADD: Room 3028, Building 46, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China Zip Code: 100871 ------=_Part_36684_11034478.1216894502961-- From general-return-423-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 01 21:59:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41717 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2009 21:59:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2009 21:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 39495 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 21:59:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39423 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 21:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39413 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2009 21:59:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:59:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:59:06 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so3384011qyk.5 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:58:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=602EASQjyJZKhhmYQEEwUMrpiHcJhPkKKRZgcSbGw5s=; b=HrZwjelyd91ZmQJBu40QUQxXDJlk97HphdbzR4Fq6eEwSywnaHV65sU+u3w3svMvgW Vam1XrD0i15NGTwUc/A0rhDOPMq4VIsPj2qCvY+gdkFx7DX9xPD659No/pmVtHzEJ5v8 a8tldeSt5F1OQFjfjMiEtdWltXFIcjQb+3s0c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WZ0Vp0H3/1uTQoTcoe6cBaO6e3sazrsw7DHxZaE9O4IwHT9rkGNri2IV8k18h8w9Nh KbB7u+2FfjMp/q2mr3OmI8y40P+xOVHnZU1DXUdyiznXdL3TK2RyaE2p/DxXZSVxRwhT CsRwHgKnvivhwemKX/Sq/kyHzWIE+wVpHBXMY= Received: by 10.224.11.142 with SMTP id t14mr3334910qat.356.1249163925730; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.90.4? (pool-71-246-212-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.212.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm9328433qwj.56.2009.08.01.14.58.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:58:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A74BA93.6000802@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:58:43 -0400 From: Christopher L Tubbs II User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: mapreduce classpath issue References: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADA5@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <4A6A7D7C.8030202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A6A7D7C.8030202@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I previously sent the following message requesting assistance with classpath issues. I've now appeared to resolve the issue, in that the libjars that I specify are added to the classpath for the mapper tasks, but NOT for the run() method of the Tool. I can get around this by specifying HADOOP_CLASSPATH environment variable with the identical libjar listing, but this seems to be a bit clunky for a quick mapreduce job. Shouldn't libjars also place the jars on the hadoop classpath for the thread that executes run()? Right now, to avoid setting the libjars twice, I use (syntax may not be exactly right, I'm going by memory): job.setInputFormat(conf.getClassByName("my.package.Class"))) However, in my InputFormat class, I also have static methods that add information to the conf for the mapper task, in the same way that FileInputFormat and FileOutputFormat do, so as to abstract away the implementation details of those configuration settings. So, while I can set the input format / output format by class name, I cannot access these static methods in the run() thread unless I use reflection. It seems very odd that libjars only works for the mapper/reducer tasks and not for the Tool.run() method. The two workarounds I've found are, as I've stated above: 1. duplicating the libjars listing on the HADOOP_CLASSPATH environment variable for the Tool thread, and 2. grabbing the class from the conf.getClassByName() and using reflection to call the static methods to configure the class' options. On a side note, it also seems very clumsy that the Tool requires to extend Configured so that you can create the JobConf from the one retrieved from getConf() so that the libjars works at all. Any thoughts or suggestions for an easier way? Christopher L Tubbs II wrote: > So, I've been having an issue running on Mac OS, with classpath for > MapReduce jobs on version 0.20.0 > > The basic idea is that I want to add a jar as a dependency to a > MapReduce job. I know I can add the jar to HADOOP_CLASSPATH, but I do > not have access to hadoop-env.xml (administrator restricted). > > I have been using the "hadoop jar" command to execute a class with a > main() contained within my jar. My class extends Configured and > implements Tool. The main() calls ToolRunner.run() to launch the job, > and I specify -libjars on the command line, which I see from the source, > uses the GenericOptionsParser to strip the "-libjars x.jar,y.jar,z.jar" > from the arguments passed to my class. I then get errors that I can't > find classes contained within my library jars. > > From within run(), my debugging code demonstrates that the jar files are > readable, and I can getResource() to verify that the classes are > available in those jars. However, I still get errors, because it doesn't > seem that at any point, the JVM is using the contextClassLoader that the > resources were added with. > > Perhaps this is a bug with Mac OS's JVM 1.6, or am I doing something > wrong? Everything works fine in linux with the identical setup. > > > - > Chris From general-return-424-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 11 15:24:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27920 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2009 15:24:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2009 15:24:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 21368 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 15:25:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21314 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 15:25:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21304 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2009 15:25:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:25:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:24:55 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1349777wfg.2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=PN7LJeNPtR2Hgc//MOV9N7hLzCQcEtRvE+5EceHh7UI=; b=DgaKkJb3Qld/ZBVb/B3Q40vHgMKjW/QGb5xhCC0RY/2NYXeHZJLUmdRHk2CXyfWcx3 GrstER+Dbek2J1edjesSCzf41N1g9h9UJvljCroibAGarunwfjC4ujP/CIyWfwQCe8Gn yqeyBu+iRlzEmA+F7wVGPODOJ7ZAR5gdCK/sI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WDCUQpYmQHJV+AXZQ1HcZLzXtF3MA190MmceffwqVdqWFHbulSOVDrpLnhXwtiAryq qEp0rdkOvVXi5DWvc7JmYvwoegRfv1jZ6EzHBhn+Vgvb3C00HfrOMc1Y5h3103qKAdOg WXm390iaeRwnPJNDHM5W9xNnIvCVaSktql4UY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.233.21 with SMTP id f21mr1225767wfh.229.1250004274748; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:24:34 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350908110824j54ddcf6bre1146d09628061ad@mail.gmail.com> Subject: run WordCount example have many fetch-failure issues randomly but finally succeed, From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e04cc39d490470df4c94 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2e04cc39d490470df4c94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It runs very well at the first several times, but when run it again, the hadoop system become pretty much slow and show the following errors during the runnig process(map 100% reduce: 22%) though it finally succeed. Info mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_xxx_0030_m_002_0, Status: FAILED: many fetch_failures When I run it again, it become OK until same failures after another several time run. Any potential reasons? How can I probe this issue? Thx. --000e0cd2e04cc39d490470df4c94-- From general-return-425-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 04:32:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50697 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 04:32:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 04:32:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 44260 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 04:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44159 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 04:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44148 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 04:32:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:32:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eelco.hillenius@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.185] (HELO mail-yx0-f185.google.com) (209.85.210.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:32:05 +0000 Received: by yxe15 with SMTP id 15so1735874yxe.5 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JcEgH3Mr4qsR1c3GNrxetDaFcovmrTzLatz/skLn2CU=; b=cWoBzAwmeqWLos943LOgL31RB5M8u4o54urCUXqTxfEXWo/oRdCKyaDD07NY2r63yM XpDd6cIe1dzzVKgWYH+g88+Qs21/DVxTwg4ZWxEPZYUXO9VveQNysSGcUhJDKX3DIDd4 tgIZ1kTLJZhaLXA1zjqB9282z4gjExTpvz+ro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=wm1kwfm8Ad3LW85pc7ArY5NpuZrLi9uRn4W2PtmtVmaS7CRZYQMliEkDYenRCuUOM9 Y/lcpdGsZTYBLY7RkTmlV1o+6UZmt5u8jHlh7+h0r0erp4OoSKSEnUIsNALH4Vohkb63 Fp0oYV2dgkB0TRGb9lsfNXMlCx+j77bOz2Bcc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.58.8 with SMTP id g8mr2080561yba.347.1250224304832; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:31:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Eelco Hillenius Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:31:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: HUG Sunnyvale on the 20th of August? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I was wondering whether there will be a Hadoop User Group event on 20th of August. I happen to be in town (Sunnyvale), and I would love to meet a few Hadoopers. Cheers, Eelco From general-return-426-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 17:51:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69180 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 17:51:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 17:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9977 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 17:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9910 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 17:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9900 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 17:51:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:51:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:51:10 +0000 Received: from [172.21.149.58] (wlanvpn-mc2e-247-58.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.149.58]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7EHoVnq012194 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N8k2fwZtqqRWNQFrPmV0BrgZ3IIGDxhiH/0LfsRjdJ+TP3Rw1VkrJRTqolRc/kZY Message-ID: <4A85A3E6.4040703@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:50:30 -0700 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HUG Sunnyvale on the 20th of August? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eelco- The August meetup will be the 19th at Yahoo!. For this month you can sign up to attend at meetup (http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/10877366/?action=detail&eventId=10877366) rather than the regular Yahoo! Upcoming site. Hope to see you there. Cheers- Jakob Homan Hadoop at Yahoo! Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering whether there will be a Hadoop User Group event on > 20th of August. I happen to be in town (Sunnyvale), and I would love > to meet a few Hadoopers. > > Cheers, > > Eelco From general-return-427-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 17:55:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70308 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 17:55:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 17:55:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 13930 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 17:55:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13832 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 17:55:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13822 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 17:55:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:55:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eelco.hillenius@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.198] (HELO mail-yw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.211.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:54:57 +0000 Received: by ywh36 with SMTP id 36so2634505ywh.31 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ooTHeGN4ONpDTjLpzcP7LUwGT0/fX4B8YQ5fPNVJHsY=; b=NQWRVP+wJ9xyWUYnh4A4OGA/VsjwW9XSZW0M5lYFVBrCFEebBQzEYZ/LpO/luf4GD+ 2ferzTe2vSLT9Q+zttSWLLg6hfMt0LVF3BGu9nBpcRIbJbi67uZdhzvn/nbKFMkcN6LM m2gkU9esskznM8uDtYRrRUAjH4blhv9Qe++4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BW8UAGeMhrkYgijG36XDKfBD2uTUS8nA0Ivh8DCWLI7cSG3Fsv9YNAwzK9ileu0vRU 6JZUPUHEHyEIrZplSt2TimkAp1AcNfa+HSZVTGkM3BCrqgRw/H7zdoRn4FYXMLLlXtvn gyhLMYRK+5eTKJqLVqJvj/Q2t6jgoCOjW1DIQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr2790359ybd.99.1250272477093; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A85A3E6.4040703@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4A85A3E6.4040703@yahoo-inc.com> From: Eelco Hillenius Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:54:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HUG Sunnyvale on the 20th of August? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah, thanks. Hope to make it! Eelco On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > Eelco- > =A0 The August meetup will be the 19th at Yahoo!. =A0For this month you c= an sign > up to attend at meetup > (http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/10877366/?action=3Ddetail&eventId= =3D10877366) > rather than the regular Yahoo! Upcoming site. =A0Hope to see you there. > > Cheers- > > Jakob Homan > Hadoop at Yahoo! From general-return-428-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 18:42:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4264 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 18:42:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 18:42:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 81586 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 18:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81529 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 18:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81519 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 18:42:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:42:43 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.197] (UNKNOWN-10-72-168-7.yahoo.com [10.72.168.7] (may be forged)) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n7EIetcI022273 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <06027605-FB87-4F35-A40E-3E01C9B0B65B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Fwd: Amazon Elastic MapReduce Now Supports Apache Pig Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:40:55 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Begin forwarded message: > From: "Sirota, Peter" > Date: August 10, 2009 6:17:26 PM PDT > To: "pig-user@hadoop.apache.org" > Subject: Amazon Elastic MapReduce Now Supports Apache Pig > Reply-To: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org > > Dear Pig Users, > > We are excited to announce that Amazon Elastic MapReduce now > supports Apache Pig - making the service even more compelling for > large data set processing and analytics. Apache Pig is a platform > for analyzing large data sets that consists of a high-level language > for expressing data analysis programs, coupled with infrastructure > for evaluating these programs. > > Learn more in the Pig and Amazon Elastic MapReduce tutorial (http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2729&categoryID=269 > ) > > Watch a video (http://s3.amazonaws.com/awsVideos/AmazonElasticMapReduce/ElasticMapReduce-PigTutorial.html > ) > > Use a sample Apache log processing application (http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2728&categoryID=263 > ) > > > Sincerely, > The Amazon Elastic MapReduce Team From general-return-429-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 18:56:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6919 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 18:56:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 18:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 98112 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 18:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98028 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 18:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98018 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:56:18 +0000 Received: from [10.72.185.127] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n7EIsbLU068400 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:54:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XqmbadhbrAT6+v/wNOJfaBqeKie5Em0ADwdxy2e2cvu3MCgz51QYacDUtYbarQPt Message-ID: <4A85B2ED.2020900@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:54:37 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HUG Sunnyvale on the 20th of August? References: <4A85A3E6.4040703@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is the 19th, right? --Konstantin Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Ah, thanks. Hope to make it! > > Eelco > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> Eelco- >> The August meetup will be the 19th at Yahoo!. For this month you can sign >> up to attend at meetup >> (http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/10877366/?action=detail&eventId=10877366) >> rather than the regular Yahoo! Upcoming site. Hope to see you there. >> >> Cheers- >> >> Jakob Homan >> Hadoop at Yahoo! > From general-return-430-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 19:30:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17320 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 19:30:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 19:30:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 45338 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 19:30:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45266 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 19:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45256 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 19:30:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eelco.hillenius@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.198] (HELO mail-yw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.211.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:30:50 +0000 Received: by ywh36 with SMTP id 36so2725533ywh.31 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zNPl8VN7F7iUMqiYQQMi9MMhmFYjXFAlMzPi88UVTbk=; b=GqgrBsBzviaN8K3U0cLNrvx8a792ALeJTu594MGxFMpKTU0Go98NF1jXK0oNiATDJq gMCVgQb5J7tCZ4VZ3aZhLG9POsZDnpX2uPMLZ7lQlqWlUbH0ZBxzXU3o4C1Dhs1AojV/ LbFkcTyO/v7gBOzcg8DwUVbHmcKJ0X5jLqmIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=n6OOK0ivGQbFvmQY9imjmh6M/noOO8hx1YCkoW9JS3LEkKrVmzELyBsHD/V6hfT6cK HD3a6JVuGYrJ14FT37oj7hagADKyirHwSYeUTgHww/gVvTIgfxyDSqY8ee3xbdt24B9J b84bANSkYrzwF8J2rDtjvmIYNSPTusBbq+yss= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.237.9 with SMTP id k9mr2872700ybh.108.1250278229188; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Eelco Hillenius Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:30:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: comparing sub/ 3rd party projects that abstract map/reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Would people mind sharing their opinions about the relative strengths and weaknesses of Hive, Chukwa and Pig (and possibly other alternatives)? I'm only just getting into Hadoop, but it seems to me these libs have a considerable overlap depending on what you use them for? I plan to check those sub projects out anyway, and I'm definitively not trying to start a flame war here, but it would be great to hear some opinions about what areas these projects are particularly useful for and what might need some work etc. As a bit of context, we (Teachscape) are considering Hadoop for storing audit log files and extracting information from them. The audit logging we do is application specific, e.g. user Foo deleted Survey X, user Bar moved organization node AAB to AB, etc, and besides the need to run a couple of fixed reports weekly (mainly that give our customers some insight in how they are using our application), I expect us to want to create queries on the fly to e.g. track down problems. I don't expect our developers to have a problem writing Map/ Reduce programs, but I do like the idea of a higher level way of extracting information. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated, Eelco From general-return-431-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 14 21:31:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58878 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 21:31:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 21:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 88517 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 21:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88434 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 21:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88424 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 21:31:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:31:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eelco.hillenius@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.227] (HELO mail-gx0-f227.google.com) (209.85.217.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:31:06 +0000 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so2265574gxk.12 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aC+k40AGTt32i8uJ2bthAEL9VM1ELEm6n99YSA4LLBQ=; b=Gim3u6UnwC+MlmuX372SMWorKxhweTiS26BbdZhpQUx63bYv7bM7sVPoAr0ydk1tJq h04HwcoLhUPJz+1tzBFO9oJ4O715JLsrtDYcsAAbYslRohNNBS6Pa25IVxRLJyyDkWKr Wx94Stls94Tlfho0YVoVdIkrWVQ9KlId1WY9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QPWhnDJcYT/BpZH5rJmpZU7qXV/FI1Aey/SHKpD8DOLXP4nwcme3Cal8kiKHIXiIz7 nWsfgDSZKaVTcy8eC+9pDGd9SVK3tlWvLNJCv03wT3U5BspXrn/J2aI/sKY6dphzUFMF WvSw6ICn7GXiI1wID0GRtY+gKnw7NYh2EFJ6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.208.21 with SMTP id f21mr2983819ybg.80.1250285446084; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eelco Hillenius Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:30:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: comparing sub/ 3rd party projects that abstract map/reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I found some discussions on this (like http://www.nabble.com/HBase,-Hive,-Pig-and-other-Hadoop-based-technologies-td19287896.html), pls disregard my email. Thanks, Eelco On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > Hi, > > Would people mind sharing their opinions about the relative strengths > and weaknesses of Hive, Chukwa and Pig (and possibly other > alternatives)? > > I'm only just getting into Hadoop, but it seems to me these libs have > a considerable overlap depending on what you use them for? I plan to > check those sub projects out anyway, and I'm definitively not trying > to start a flame war here, but it would be great to hear some opinions > about what areas these projects are particularly useful for and what > might need some work etc. > > As a bit of context, we (Teachscape) are considering Hadoop for > storing audit log files and extracting information from them. The > audit logging we do is application specific, e.g. user Foo deleted > Survey X, user Bar moved organization node AAB to AB, etc, and besides > the need to run a couple of fixed reports weekly (mainly that give our > customers some insight in how they are using our application), I > expect us to want to create queries on the fly to e.g. track down > problems. I don't expect our developers to have a problem writing Map/ > Reduce programs, but I do like the idea of a higher level way of > extracting information. > > Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated, > > Eelco > From general-return-432-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 15 05:18:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29192 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2009 05:18:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2009 05:18:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 21288 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2009 05:19:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21187 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2009 05:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21176 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2009 05:18:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:18:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lamfeeling@126.com designates 220.181.15.112 as permitted sender) Received: from [220.181.15.112] (HELO m15-112.126.com) (220.181.15.112) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:18:47 +0000 Received: from SongPC (unknown [114.221.89.98]) by smtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id DMmowLD7K2sgRYZKH9xuCQ--.63719S2; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:18:24 +0800 (CST) From: =?gb2312?B?wfjLyQ==?= To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [AD]A www crawler for Hadoop Application (Pagerank Computing Included) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:18:23 +0800 Message-ID: <001201ca1d67$cff5f440$6fe1dcc0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcocmDTNzHQBzUJfQzGD6VdxJJH3XwAzHNdg Content-Language: zh-cn x-cr-hashedpuzzle: Aa2R AyQB BVd4 CGYI CjDk C7aj EOvH Egm8 Fes3 Gex8 HXnI HZdb IVEO JNlE JX0r KGWI;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{4C244B7A-06C4-4FC8-B1B4-B04A33FD95D2};bABhAG0AZgBlAGUAbABpAG4AZwBAADEAMgA2AC4AYwBvAG0A;Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:18:20 GMT;WwBBAEQAXQBBACAAdwB3AHcAIABjAHIAYQB3AGwAZQByACAAZgBvAHIAIABIAGEAZABvAG8AcAAgAEEAcABwAGwAaQBjAGEAdABpAG8AbgAgACgAUABhAGcAZQByAGEAbgBrACAAQwBvAG0AcAB1AHQAaQBuAGcAIABJAG4AYwBsAHUAZABlAGQAKQA= x-cr-puzzleid: {4C244B7A-06C4-4FC8-B1B4-B04A33FD95D2} X-CM-TRANSID: DMmowLD7K2sgRYZKH9xuCQ--.63719S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrKF4Utry3GF4DZr4DZFWxXrb_yoWkWwb_u3 sxWrnFgw4kArZ7Xw42vrs0yFZ5W3yFyFWrZwn5Ww17Gr95Z3ykWFZ7KFZxWFW3XrZ0kan5 Zr1Yqw1Yyry09jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy29KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU qKb7IF0VCYb41lb7IF0VCF04k20xv_Gry3M7k042IE42xK82IY64kIx2x0424lb7IF0VCF I7km07C26c804VAKzcIF0wAYjsxI4VWUJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1I0E4x 80FVCIwcAKzIAtM7C26IkvcIIF6IxKo4kEV4yl1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwV C2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2kK67kvxFCE 548m6r1fGryUXwAqjxCE34x0Y48IcwAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI 8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4IEnf9E lVAFpTB2q-sK649IAas0WaI_GwCjxxvEw4Wlc7Ca8VAvwVA2a4k0FcxrMxkIecxEwVAFwV W8WwCY0x0Ix7I2Y4AK6F4j6FyUMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxCjnVAqn7xvrwC2zVAF1VAY 17CE14v26r1j6r15MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IUjjYLPUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: xodpwvxhol0wa6rslhhfrp/ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear all: These days, I have wrote an hadoop www crawler for my project, and I hope this little open source program may help you in work. I originally decided to use the Nutch, however, soon I found it was so complicated to modify and develop my own work on it. So I studied the basic mechanism of Nutch Crawler, and rewrite some core components with my own code, which is called project Joycrawler. I aim to build a functional and convenient tool for some web data mining jobs and links analysis hadoop programs, so the whole project Joycrawler is a standard program and can be simply reused in other hadoop applications. It is compatible with hadoop 0.20.0( both Apache and Yahoo's distribution), and include a Pagerank computing program, which is also a standard hadoop program. I hope following information is helpful for you. Project home: http://code.google.com/p/joycrawler/ Or try it now: http://joycrawler.googlecode.com/files/joycrawler-0.11.0.zip For manual: http://joycrawler.googlecode.com/files/Readme-0.11.1.pdf Contact: lamfeeling@126.com Best Regards Song Liu in Soochow University From general-return-433-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 16 05:33:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57504 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2009 05:33:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2009 05:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39550 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2009 05:33:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39440 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2009 05:33:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41960 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2009 01:24:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-19.0 required=10.0 tests=ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sirota@amazon.com designates 207.171.184.25 as permitted sender) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,356,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="253987113" From: "Sirota, Peter" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:23:45 -0700 Subject: Amazon Elastic MapReduce Now Supports Apache Pig Thread-Topic: Amazon Elastic MapReduce Now Supports Apache Pig Thread-Index: AcoaGcn3+u0GiiWtQOifJVsAt0z+wQAB119QAAAbBkAAACljIA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {4BBBFED8-7C51-4C23-8AA8-D6B25D35A715} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: hUM= AWmD AcAA BHNY CPJS DkM5 D4ph EwPR FFiw FLp9 FPUn FePK HjOs J3YH KQat Kfgv;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{4BBBFED8-7C51-4C23-8AA8-D6B25D35A715};cwBpAHIAbwB0AGEAQABhAG0AYQB6AG8AbgAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:23:45 GMT;QQBtAGEAegBvAG4AIABFAGwAYQBzAHQAaQBjACAATQBhAHAAUgBlAGQAdQBjAGUAIABOAG8AdwAgAFMAdQBwAHAAbwByAHQAcwAgAEEAcABhAGMAaABlACAAUABpAGcA acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear Hadoop Users, We are excited to announce that Amazon Elastic MapReduce now supports Apach= e Pig - making the service even more compelling for large data set processi= ng and analytics. Apache Pig is a platform for analyzing large data sets th= at consists of a high-level language for expressing data analysis programs,= coupled with infrastructure for evaluating these programs. Learn more in the Pig and Amazon Elastic MapReduce tutorial (http://develop= er.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=3D2729&categoryID=3D= 269)=20 Watch a video (http://s3.amazonaws.com/awsVideos/AmazonElasticMapReduce/Ela= sticMapReduce-PigTutorial.html) Use a sample Apache log processing application (http://developer.amazonwebs= ervices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=3D2728&categoryID=3D263)=20 Sincerely, The Amazon Elastic MapReduce Team From general-return-434-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 17 22:23:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38552 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2009 22:23:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2009 22:23:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 48529 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2009 21:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48109 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2009 21:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47924 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2009 21:21:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:21:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:21:42 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7HLL3wl054767; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:subject:mime-version:date:x-mailer; b=M8e57rL2JVwVEwPTXNC1W4Rhpg0MQHo2OScyKQlubWco0+Ab6pb+gBblY26nrsXJ Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Impact of MS search deal on Y! Hadoop development Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:21:03 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, this is old news now...but we continue to get questions. For those that didn't see it, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote a blog a couple weeks ago on Yahoo!'s continued strong investment in Hadoop. http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/07/news_flash_hadoop_development.html Nige From general-return-435-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 20 13:54:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77109 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2009 13:54:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2009 13:54:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 5692 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 13:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5624 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 13:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5613 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2009 13:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.223.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:54:33 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so498342iwn.5 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:54:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=73K2tEqxmRPFysHN4Z1kPWDT4Fw/HL7eTkCLQq+FAx8=; b=Rqkf1WFpd0haXECJuOT7SYHoWxYl5Al19kzUJsNzEdLqa837ixMlGtbb+2QwzEFZye 38bqPbbuZpKBv0OpUgcj4jxktayAB+pcop9SKhHpe0r20od3cFeoi1SRp27Tewhffvk5 U/218LX2MmU3IICf64V4OuACxGsTSkpHgPaBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UdR5CS+4VV3ah0eWdNWUXa6bjNHCK3msnf1YuHow40Dgiu1T73O093UmxZhMuGTuXl QqP1DQ9oUesE7O2jSgSnDhVD+B+LjaP8SoKgO/KSGWYgU1POKN2OKDAQBW8jvtKM+yRH s3mAzVkK9PDf1JB51Wquq51AxdaNz9lmW7MEs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.141 with SMTP id x13mr4469538ibd.39.1250776451808; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:54:11 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Invalid argument for option USER_DATA_FILE From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255769461a8000047193162b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0003255769461a8000047193162b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi When I try to execute *hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2*, it executes, but keep waiting at "Waiting for instance to start", find below the exact display as it shows on my screen $ bin/hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2 Testing for existing master in group: test-cluster Creating group test-cluster-master GROUP test-cluster-master Group for Hadoop Master. GROUP test-cluster-master PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS all FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster-master GROUP test-cluster-master PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 22 22 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP test-cluster-master PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 50030 50030 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP test-cluster-master PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 50060 50060 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 Creating group test-cluster GROUP test-cluster Group for Hadoop Slaves. GROUP test-cluster PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS all FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster GROUP test-cluster PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 22 22 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP test-cluster PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 50030 50030 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP test-cluster PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 50060 50060 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP test-cluster-master PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS all FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster GROUP test-cluster PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS all FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster-master Starting master with AMI ami-fa6a8e93 Invalid argument for option '-f, --user-data-file DATA-FILE': '/home/bike/hadoo -0.19.2/src/contrib/ec2/bin/hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh' (-h for usage) Waiting for instance to start ............................................................................... ............................................................................... It just keeps on producing new dots, thats it and i guess this process will never finish, I tried hours to search for the solution on the net, but unsuccessful. I will appreciate if anyone can help me with this problem? H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --0003255769461a8000047193162b-- From general-return-436-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 20 14:21:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94324 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2009 14:21:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2009 14:21:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 74477 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 14:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74420 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 14:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74410 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2009 14:21:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:31 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so196845ewy.36 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:21:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.21.205 with SMTP id r55mr1901850wer.175.1250778068719; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:21:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:21:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Invalid argument for option USER_DATA_FILE From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Harshit, Please see comment below. Cheers, Tom P.S. Questions like this are best sent to common-user. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Harshit Kumar wrot= e: > Hi > When I try to execute *hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2*, it > executes, but keep waiting at "Waiting for instance to start", find below > the exact display as it shows on my screen > > > $ bin/hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2 > Testing for existing master in group: test-cluster > Creating group test-cluster-master > GROUP =A0 test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 Group for Hadoop Master. > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster-master > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 ALLOWS = =A0all > FROM =A0 =A0USER =A0 =A05282-1142-6451 =A0GRPNAME test-cluster-master > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster-master > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 ALLOWS = =A0tcp =A0 =A0 22 =A0 =A0 =A022 > FROM =A0 =A0CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster-master > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 ALLOWS = =A0tcp =A0 =A0 50030 > 50030 > FROM =A0 =A0CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster-master > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 ALLOWS = =A0tcp =A0 =A0 50060 > 50060 > FROM =A0 =A0CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > Creating group test-cluster > GROUP =A0 test-cluster =A0 =A0Group for Hadoop Slaves. > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster =A0 =A0ALLOWS =A0all = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 FROM > USER =A0 =A05282-1142-6451 =A0GRPNAME test-cluster > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster =A0 =A0ALLOWS =A0tcp = =A0 =A0 22 =A0 =A0 =A022 =A0 =A0 =A0FROM > CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster =A0 =A0ALLOWS =A0tcp = =A0 =A0 50030 =A0 50030 =A0 FROM > CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster =A0 =A0ALLOWS =A0tcp = =A0 =A0 50060 =A0 50060 =A0 FROM > CIDR =A0 =A00.0.0.0/0 > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster-master > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster-master =A0 =A0 ALLOWS = =A0all > FROM =A0 =A0USER =A0 =A05282-1142-6451 =A0GRPNAME test-cluster > GROUP =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 test-cluster > PERMISSION =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0test-cluster =A0 =A0ALLOWS =A0all = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 FROM > USER =A0 =A05282-1142-6451 =A0GRPNAME test-cluster-master > Starting master with AMI ami-fa6a8e93 > Invalid argument for option '-f, --user-data-file DATA-FILE': > '/home/bike/hadoo > -0.19.2/src/contrib/ec2/bin/hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh' (-h for usage) The path looks odd here: a missing "p" in "hadoop", and it's also split over two lines. What is the actual location of the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh file on your machine? > Waiting for instance =A0to start > .........................................................................= ...... > .........................................................................= ...... > > It just keeps on producing new dots, thats it and i guess this process wi= ll > never finish, > > I tried hours to search for the solution on the net, but unsuccessful. > > I will appreciate if anyone can =A0help me with this problem? > > H. Kumar > Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 > Phone(Office): +82-31- > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > From general-return-437-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 20 15:57:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38831 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2009 15:57:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2009 15:57:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 33182 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 15:57:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33119 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2009 15:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33109 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2009 15:57:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:57:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.223.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:57:43 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so545861iwn.5 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Qnl/01o7KGwnzUlRlhKSNtxpIfHm2UN/33C1yn22jrQ=; b=O+ev4ca/VfPCYgixSlTaymOocW/ece7wyrldwfGrkbYh0oYJbn9iUfQEG5sg9cIAGc xM9EmiC/hwnBVIAN/YNrLe9Wc7ZMuZB5nIEn43dnvfCH1ICbDJBgBQ8EM8szMMvmXwDz 05mprI7eveLZsDmsoc8mT6lO4rHRMul9GnrxA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QO99XJbSpVTToFt6stQTYisVHXJdmf9iChJLY1KFShdaGEH27DDIp3Qv5RSZZLes5z yHckiSp9DoTlZqhnJ4aBf9XNgJDzfjCF7fpvDZevygW+cucy/eeJxFiSBw7pl1q+5tcl cnKWT2KpJ6QHThJKRtZq4b8k8RoNTE27K3f70= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.34.3 with SMTP id j3mr4542833ibd.43.1250783842559; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:57:22 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Invalid argument for option USER_DATA_FILE From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532cda4a06b3d047194ce26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221532cda4a06b3d047194ce26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Tom for your reply. Actually that missing 'p' is bcos i copied it wrongly. Here i paste the error message again Starting master with AMI ami-fa6a8e93 Invalid argument for option '-f, --user-data-file DATA-FILE': '/home/bike/hadoop-0.19.2/src/contrib/ec2/bin/hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh' (-h for usage) The actual location of adoop-ec2-init-remote.sh is this C:\cygwin\home\bike\hadoop-0.19.2\src\contrib\ec2\bin Thanks once again for responding. I am also posting the original msg at common-user@hadoop.apache.org, thanks for letting me know. Regards H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/8/20 Tom White > Hi Harshit, > > Please see comment below. > > Cheers, > Tom > > P.S. Questions like this are best sent to common-user. > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Harshit Kumar > wrote: > > Hi > > When I try to execute *hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2*, it > > executes, but keep waiting at "Waiting for instance to start", find below > > the exact display as it shows on my screen > > > > > > $ bin/hadoop-ec2 launch-cluster test-cluster 2 > > Testing for existing master in group: test-cluster > > Creating group test-cluster-master > > GROUP test-cluster-master Group for Hadoop Master. > > GROUP test-cluster-master > > PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS all > > FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster-master > > GROUP test-cluster-master > > PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 22 > 22 > > FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > GROUP test-cluster-master > > PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 50030 > > 50030 > > FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > GROUP test-cluster-master > > PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS tcp 50060 > > 50060 > > FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > Creating group test-cluster > > GROUP test-cluster Group for Hadoop Slaves. > > GROUP test-cluster > > PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS all > FROM > > USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster > > GROUP test-cluster > > PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 22 22 > FROM > > CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > GROUP test-cluster > > PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 50030 50030 > FROM > > CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > GROUP test-cluster > > PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS tcp 50060 50060 > FROM > > CIDR 0.0.0.0/0 > > GROUP test-cluster-master > > PERMISSION test-cluster-master ALLOWS all > > FROM USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster > > GROUP test-cluster > > PERMISSION test-cluster ALLOWS all > FROM > > USER 5282-1142-6451 GRPNAME test-cluster-master > > Starting master with AMI ami-fa6a8e93 > > Invalid argument for option '-f, --user-data-file DATA-FILE': > > '/home/bike/hadoo > > -0.19.2/src/contrib/ec2/bin/hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh' (-h for usage) > > The path looks odd here: a missing "p" in "hadoop", and it's also > split over two lines. What is the actual location of the > hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh file on your machine? > > > Waiting for instance to start > > > ............................................................................... > > > ............................................................................... > > > > It just keeps on producing new dots, thats it and i guess this process > will > > never finish, > > > > I tried hours to search for the solution on the net, but unsuccessful. > > > > I will appreciate if anyone can help me with this problem? > > > > H. Kumar > > Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 > > Phone(Office): +82-31- > > skype: harshit900 > > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > --00221532cda4a06b3d047194ce26-- From general-return-440-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 22 06:33:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46298 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2009 06:33:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2009 06:33:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 48352 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 06:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48289 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 06:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48279 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2009 06:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:33:19 +0000 Received: from OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XJN01c0030QkzPwA6JYyMp; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:32:58 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.59] ([98.234.216.58]) by OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XJYt1c0041GAoR68NJYxGa; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:32:58 +0000 Message-Id: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:32:52 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structure that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen From general-return-441-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 22 06:58:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48148 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2009 06:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2009 06:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 53998 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 06:59:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53913 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 06:59:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53903 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2009 06:59:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:59:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.198.238] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:58:56 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so398141rvb.29 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.188.15 with SMTP id l15mr1223809rvf.119.1250924313810; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm4396478rvb.3.2009.08.21.23.58.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A8F970D.7030804@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:58:21 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed > jira traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate > the structure that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, > I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-442-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 02:11:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12838 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 02:11:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 02:11:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 2329 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 22:12:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2259 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2009 22:12:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2249 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2009 22:12:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:12:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:11:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c95.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.95]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7MM9vUa036858 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Lv6vMjCCqwYmSLfaYyLivUPiuv1Z0iW6L8JXeo4MWWIi+/Osys+qYFnuUVYUrZuZ Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:09:58 -0700 References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Aug 21, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that > detailed jira traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will > replicate the structure that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-443-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 02:34:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23261 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 02:34:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 02:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26877 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 02:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26803 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 02:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26792 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 02:35:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [131.107.115.214] (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) (131.107.115.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:35:11 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.180) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:34:48 -0700 Received: from TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.97.26]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:34:42 -0700 From: "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list Thread-Index: AQHKIvKS7HhDXaoVk0W8RJwKtjpmUJCy7pYA Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:34:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 -----Original Message----- From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 11:33 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira = traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structur= e that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen From general-return-444-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 03:07:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35453 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 03:07:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 03:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 44900 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 03:07:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44711 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 03:07:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44701 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 03:07:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:07:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hdspork@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.223.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:07:48 +0000 Received: by iwn6 with SMTP id 6so700824iwn.5 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:07:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w9bskveKmJMoDnzrhySe1KmUrxhPRrf1z2ECOcthjc0=; b=Pnnz7kiaZVSt1FiS4jLGZek5LDLvXOCY9QuQ00M42Bqf5kfWdVYLTxrU1/nuGxFQGa 6OUD1kOUlyiwwv7i/D7QP72U6shETKn5xGgwuFsK7TNVwqMYSGbHqzfvxfCVOsK0cOTJ evVE2AaP6e8FsRJx101tUtTG/3twQKVSHSMFU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vl5HTFziUXS21+js2c9fPL2cgowRxd4PgNJrn3/9hXcclwXTMoW2XIkIIzJ6SJSO7b 2u7gp8ezmFeFPCQq3DAvzLN36A7rXOnPV2l+2YS3JylgXmcy14s6vNVU8lrWe1Bt/wug RnPfxOeAqZ7bV1If+jxnAYHzyf7Fk6zGU7NV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.18.69 with SMTP id v5mr1492738iba.26.1250996847244; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:07:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:07:27 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list From: He ZY To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221504666fb1f6bc0471c6660c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00221504666fb1f6bc0471c6660c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) < Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com> wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 11:33 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list > > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira > traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structure > that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > > --00221504666fb1f6bc0471c6660c-- From general-return-445-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 06:18:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52749 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 06:18:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 06:18:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 10899 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 06:19:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10819 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 06:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10808 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 06:19:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:19:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of digvijaysinghshaktawat@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.190] (HELO mail-px0-f190.google.com) (209.85.216.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:19:09 +0000 Received: by pxi28 with SMTP id 28so4643913pxi.2 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=VZlmbFlYdTd5ZpvkEHaxBF2u7ALUjQVRXNgMMp01uE4=; b=FeLZLfhSp1qe/8LQK/fR9p4r2WWGMb5QVPzfnwCRQrOKSn7AtQpyCmEJLsbacoWA6k gPTgCnUGGMAuM8j+MwxWkDFgKmM25d5HPZTpaAJBMuYvpxdbxkCARjufh/rAowhdvSpO Lh2i6pO/6z3qUfINXbplZdpWtQH5WMmw3+D6s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=q6VflqMvZUzVKjIKtU6qlnY6ei7M8lJHoSmor3iz4Cn5hWi1+0GfFBMoyCk7LBjheH XG8jYEo/nnX1F4RR8Lg8G4oC5YSJYQnQZxOMxUKrbwPrORjkbUyFgbcHDJRmR62FBY5K psIKKkX7DSCeUvmpnRrtX4gmZp7CCCViHwE30= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.129.3 with SMTP id g3mr304156wfn.240.1251008328242; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:48:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Need Guidance From: digvijay singh shaktawat To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c38004179f0471c91300 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5c38004179f0471c91300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We are two undergraduate student and have are determined to do a project in cloud computing as are final Btech project. We are absolutely new to hadoop and have arround six months to work on it. We wanted suggestions regarding some interesting work possible with hadoop. -Digvijay Singh -Pushpak Aggarwal --000e0cd5c38004179f0471c91300-- From general-return-446-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 08:58:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61854 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 08:58:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 08:58:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 53410 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 08:58:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53317 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 08:58:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53307 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 08:58:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:58:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tzehon.tan@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.190] (HELO mail-px0-f190.google.com) (209.85.216.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:58:25 +0000 Received: by pxi28 with SMTP id 28so4673265pxi.2 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:58:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VmroeTLz2X00uKQPzFyv0f3S8wTh8TP/qT29s8GKOS0=; b=g3+td+J14uFxg8LBT++2/v2K4/+MehC7A/NnZnHAVHXnUROqtArl32zQvq9YBuTugY pkB8U1JzYz9/VaUj+f9WpH0PFEBjc01FcR3EYCAlrgwEFSMIQjn20CcamUULBYma1hiP KqVplTkSSP+890nZoZLmeEEovW8YtHJtXbfZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XvBoT4YaFyWjUO2H/grkm83m/h/Sx0GU/L1eCX8UDxyk2HKcnMqELvqLDkdFcVqcaZ wTsOb/Avn78ig7BmzLCujPBoKs61sYkp9eyFavrISS3I0NV5liWEKQ1CMPyP6XeRfWIO sfRzxW4Jp8tH15NatwGcgZFoA1kylMqCh2//A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.249.41 with SMTP id w41mr259969wfh.347.1251017885320; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:58:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:58:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list From: Tze Hon Tan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed6870a9851e0471cb4cac X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ed6870a9851e0471cb4cac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira > traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structure > that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > --001636ed6870a9851e0471cb4cac-- From general-return-447-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 09:36:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65196 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 09:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 09:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 60594 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 09:36:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60508 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 09:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60497 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 09:36:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:36:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yeahyf@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.214] (HELO mail-bw0-f214.google.com) (209.85.218.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:36:37 +0000 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so1079330bwz.29 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=epKCdkgFyGGRfEEyGcrZtDyazPU3ZRzmHB/JTbSHMlU=; b=mfnDHfMwoCnFsysVxmVqggkTPvPDmDs0pObePvaDihO1jCtg9z08bWvIvCMi0Z7bmJ sMrBMXlfq5How+5sBN2uodm9vS5fbPG51jhamlIakiIYMph4i+KLqohVZ8589jgCPh79 8rid+M5odxOa456CBjL4y4NEoIUb/g2ELWnF8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WZiO6KYnObEPgg8OrNVa0QgT/ECs6jwLng9keGEeoPVz4xZi4U1TpUKz5/wBb03Oy3 uZF6lFIjACIiUhGUYu8oAovMyylG6xwAwoX0so3XSYcdLDnvQgHtgoTlx4CRMOW7QuFa 96MXF0hEl4LAQoJf5ylUOfXEkQy3Bm3/BxUbc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.141.142 with SMTP id c14mr348829hba.1.1251020175683; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:36:15 +0800 Message-ID: <3b13e4710908230236h16e6b5ccrd3171a7d240de9fa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list From: yangfeng To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6c5882db2040471cbd5ca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6c5882db2040471cbd5ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 2009/8/23 Tze Hon Tan > +1 > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed > jira > > traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the > structure > > that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > -- Owen > > > --001485f6c5882db2040471cbd5ca-- From general-return-448-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 15:53:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15283 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 15:53:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 15:53:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 75448 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 15:54:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75375 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 15:54:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75365 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 15:54:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:54:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luduling@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.200] (HELO mail-pz0-f200.google.com) (209.85.222.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:54:09 +0000 Received: by pzk38 with SMTP id 38so569468pzk.5 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:53:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IxH0LgPj6LG6aGgQbqfcIOcTF7rJAMQ6daRIV2RBXJE=; b=p8NxWY+cywd17MBnExnmsVW0EdaOfQ+L+U8V+i04SHuDfiOQcOidlC5TrG2CYvS+Rp fPmJlkU4VkBXVZadqGxeuzI9azTu6udnenpn2vMr6UNtisK38kPrLqXFFSsmSvuezQE7 ixYItIt4vqQWohjLO5sVxBEhBUuGsh0J7Rklg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=h1YdHrhS0qG+Wc6CPM2sDSAo9xv3kFflBINUwaIJbV10wNldISzRw949pb/du5qxd4 kfwJFNZD1dEZ88nlu853XVIfWo5QPdxh+clS6lRyDxCpoao+BpqPJIZTmFc/cq0Rk30O OzAEG7lHZE/Xa+/HtpDaBLBlEUJggPEX/MYTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.12 with SMTP id 12mr316608wfi.100.1251042828727; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:53:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:53:48 +0800 Message-ID: <64e78c10908230853y79e81b56j18f9bd4ecbfbad55@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list From: Duling Lu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502aff467b6ab0471d11bde X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502aff467b6ab0471d11bde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 2009/8/22 Owen O'Malley > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira > traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structure > that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > --00504502aff467b6ab0471d11bde-- From general-return-449-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 23 16:41:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18928 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 16:41:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 16:41:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 366 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 16:41:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 286 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 16:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 276 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 16:41:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:41:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:41:28 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c159.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.159]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n7NGdV5s083852 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=UP7sVVlhdXPh0mxmi4QKv7XleWCc4FkyAMhyaZjamrvQMWWlbnlxiSjpGxay7K9Y Message-Id: <00D49934-7287-473F-AEF5-86F2BC883383@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Need Guidance Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:39:31 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Digvijay/Pushpak, Welcome to Hadoop! We maintain a list of issues we need help with over here: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSuggestions In particular, we could use a *lot* of help with our tests and their automation etc. - good luck! Arun On Aug 22, 2009, at 11:18 PM, digvijay singh shaktawat wrote: > Hi, > We are two undergraduate student and have are determined to do a > project in cloud computing as are final Btech project. We are > absolutely > new to hadoop and have arround six months to work on it. We wanted > suggestions regarding some interesting work possible with hadoop. > > -Digvijay Singh > -Pushpak Aggarwal From general-return-450-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 10:40:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53543 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 10:40:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 10:40:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 66037 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 10:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65966 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 10:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65956 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 10:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:40:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62562B7CCE for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:27 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ki58OCwSa1Lo for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4581B7D06 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:20 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1251801608.44532@GNNFO3GJC3icHRLrU7v7zw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n7PAe7XF007435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A93BF87.3040100@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:07 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Hadoop security list? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n7PAe7XF007435 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Assuming that eventually Hadoop will add security, are there plans for a hadoop security list? In the mean time, if anyone were to have concerns about a bit of the system, should they just go as JIRA issues on the relevant project? From general-return-451-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 12:24:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86787 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 12:24:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 12:24:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 69292 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 12:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69234 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 12:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69224 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 12:24:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:24:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nicc777@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.214] (HELO mail-bw0-f214.google.com) (209.85.218.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:24:44 +0000 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so2090530bwz.29 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lgRIYiAgyYO8/oaZGEp0T2u/sJdIAOg0udRDMV2sOBA=; b=xdXNx+IwhYeU1IwOynjHow1nF7IXXmOe8JaVBLIEj5AYQ/clA63m53kKGIgBl+7w1z 6Uo4ZryT2s5U1oVuT0M51LJQaVr3F8LMv1iSZdtBoknqP+dEQO3ABTanxScqfqAzJ1ee v+XvprfrcwnQthPXL8VB4IqvVXq4zMTUEQKzQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Xxe2SXZxJevqwydyWWxOmI+8VeayPUVYyC/drW2lhgVBqBUsQqVGoZbBIpNySfDs0V URr19dEIQQ2XfQ3NQmTd+fvGZxZWLrjOsIfJz/w1PkxuPZu2mavLeP1Q2tKix7dkoYCU W+mrMjczTMbch+PLL+jEIURACsedulX0Xb2jY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.138 with SMTP id h10mr2403915bkh.187.1251203064347; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:24:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A93BF87.3040100@apache.org> References: <4A93BF87.3040100@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:24:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop security list? From: Nico Coetzee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758852e313d3a0471f66a1e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151758852e313d3a0471f66a1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps a stupid question, but what do you mean by "security"? If you run Hadoop on Linux there is a lot of things you can to "secure" your cluster. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Assuming that eventually Hadoop will add security, are there plans for a > hadoop security list? > > In the mean time, if anyone were to have concerns about a bit of the > system, should they just go as JIRA issues on the relevant project? > --00151758852e313d3a0471f66a1e-- From general-return-452-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 12:58:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1228 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 12:58:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 12:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20941 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 12:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20816 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 12:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20793 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 12:59:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:59:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:58:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051861BA3D6 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:58:39 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nr3BlAZNbKUj for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:58:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BC71BA357 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:58:38 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1251809906.2768@T+BTsEsa8oi8TKPSH2HSaw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n7PCwP9M015461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:58:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A93DFF1.4030703@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:58:25 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop security list? References: <4A93BF87.3040100@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n7PCwP9M015461 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nico Coetzee wrote: > Perhaps a stupid question, but what do you mean by "security"? If you run > Hadoop on Linux there is a lot of things you can to "secure" your cluster. > where to report security issues with Hadoop? Some asf projects have them - httpd, tomcat, ws, others dont (ant, log4j). I'm wondering where hadoop fits in on this scale of things From general-return-453-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 13:16:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7660 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 13:16:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 13:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45886 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 13:17:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45824 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 13:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45814 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 13:17:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:17:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.51.199.98] (HELO mail10.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:17:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 24706 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 13:16:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.100]) (208.127.242.153) by mail10.dslextreme.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:16:40 -0700 Message-ID: <4A93E43B.7050500@cloudera.com> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:16:43 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop security list? References: <4A93BF87.3040100@apache.org> <4A93DFF1.4030703@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A93DFF1.4030703@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MagicMail-UUID: 86fc4bf0-9179-11de-bcce-00188bf6df8c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I propose we just use general@ for now for security announcements until it deserves getting its own list. -- amr > Nico Coetzee wrote: >> Perhaps a stupid question, but what do you mean by "security"? If you >> run >> Hadoop on Linux there is a lot of things you can to "secure" your >> cluster. >> > > where to report security issues with Hadoop? > > Some asf projects have them - httpd, tomcat, ws, others dont (ant, > log4j). I'm wondering where hadoop fits in on this scale of things From general-return-454-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 15:42:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36996 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 15:42:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 15:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 14913 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 15:42:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14819 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 15:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14809 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 15:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.228] (HELO QMTA15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:41 +0000 Received: from OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by QMTA15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YeMg1c0080S2fkCAFfiNuj; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:22 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.59] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Yfi91c0082VBGtd8VfiESt; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:20 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:42:08 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start closing the holes. -- Owen From general-return-455-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 16:53:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94151 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 16:53:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 16:53:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 34808 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 16:54:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34722 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 16:54:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34702 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 16:54:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:54:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:54:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68290B7D52 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id h18SCuu4UJZ9 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E02B7D51 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:36 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1251824004.75459@dzjmPc/aBqeGxwDv5kWO7w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n7PGrOcc029598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A941704.8010300@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:53:24 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n7PGrOcc029598 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have > code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private > list with only committers that are working on the security aspects of > Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting > security issues from users so that they can fixed and released before > they are announced on public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos > integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication > in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen +1 From general-return-456-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 16:57:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95660 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 16:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 16:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 39590 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 16:58:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39518 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 16:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39508 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 16:58:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:58:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:58:02 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2001141ewy.36 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:57:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.72.85 with SMTP id s63mr1384107wed.0.1251219458194; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:57:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:57:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have > code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list > with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The > use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from > users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on > public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration > for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it > is getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen > From general-return-457-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 17:00:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97012 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 17:00:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 17:00:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 42178 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:00:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42096 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:00:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41935 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:00:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:00:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:00:14 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7PGxmRY041829 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=jtvy7kwRSPbdVcYLLeVkugm3frzL2IAKwhm/sE26BCBQ4Dr2xfsWADkZn6rMlZVG Message-Id: <1ABE40C8-A86D-4940-B91B-05896805A182@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:59:48 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we > have code that is critical from a system security perspective. As > outlined on http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will > be a private list with only committers that are working on the > security aspects of Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly > limited to collecting security issues from users so that they can > fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, such > as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos > integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any > authentication in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start > closing the holes. > > -- Owen From general-return-458-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 17:15:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3187 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 17:15:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 17:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 65746 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65685 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65675 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:16:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:16:00 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7PHCmVx093165 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=VPqMUgfV/F83eEJJkYE58V6Ufk6oGEcxBDXbARNuRqhzT4C52zTFSN+qNzB4wkyc Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:12:48 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:12:45 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Thread-Topic: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Thread-Index: AcolmsgALArR0jXFSgaPOGUpEXaDFQADHsoN Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6BA196563676ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6BA196563676ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On 8/25/09 9:12 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start closing the holes. -- Owen --_000_C6BA196563676ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-459-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 17:23:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7686 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 17:23:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 17:23:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 81022 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:24:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80976 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:24:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80878 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:24:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:24:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:23:53 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n7PHNBxD027253 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:23:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=b2ALZR9YeCQK4mwRKbHMgarSMMmrydt0VIQr+onQOsEKQ1g+rWFM+4cWPfOuUy4E Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:23:11 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:22:27 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:22:27 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org From: Mahadev Konar To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Thread-Index: AcolmsgALArR0jXFSgaPOGUpEXaDFQADHsoNAABWuZo= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2009 17:23:11.0287 (UTC) FILETIME=[B874B470:01CA25A8] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 mahadev On 8/25/09 10:12 AM, "Devaraj Das" wrote: > +1 > > > On 8/25/09 9:12 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we > have code that is critical from a system security perspective. As > outlined on http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will > be a private list with only committers that are working on the > security aspects of Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly > limited to collecting security issues from users so that they can > fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, such as > jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos > integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication > in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen > From general-return-460-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 17:26:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9047 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 17:26:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 17:26:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 83249 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:26:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83185 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83175 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:26:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:26:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:26:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:25:49 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.101]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:25:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4A941EB5.4000303@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:26:13 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Like other private ASF lists, we must remember to use this list only when privacy is required and not for general discussion of security. Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have > code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private > list with only committers that are working on the security aspects of > Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting > security issues from users so that they can fixed and released before > they are announced on public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos > integration for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication > in Hadoop, but it is getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen From general-return-461-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 25 17:44:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19914 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2009 17:44:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2009 17:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7251 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:44:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7202 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2009 17:44:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7192 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2009 17:44:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:44:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.212] (HELO web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:44:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 78242 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Aug 2009 17:43:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1251222232; bh=5TgXzL3Hxm906sHZTXiTgElPV1CTPf+3nGoumYHW+w8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=emcK9baM3B9PaG5dXgGwcXVyKDwmeltcyaNz1KTaI31Do+6KVtMmoR5RTOqDgU7jhF63Df6JpTNQoQ2WFNuTxvProQ7m3HXi/CZEgAnO/3GxwcKoqag2xotSXChFLebNJP/9l03hymh9I/mNiU9ZeA82/m+oAScXeOyiXQohVLg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ytgfw4zkqzIjBlUmj5gkEWkSnKhYjZj7WmBvH5xkULfQynEA61P3KQj4jzXL+TpbVWsXrsLmqJ7VyGkEJfRMmv9ZMErLuFSV+e+7LmXRU5SjJ+CbcStsvmue0+vvdXulv+dilbCb81Q2MnFgnItbiZm5+4KY0GaQ5xBxOAEFkr8=; Message-ID: <328288.78170.qm@web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: wdnWZLIVM1nmH3y8.6G8ImcleC_wKJt50b5YjMg0CrOkYDst16wurkWkwFIJaLOtpMXj_WvFwY0XkamLcnBUR8v3xg2Lo5bHGasQG7sgdB_RgawVNUGLEIDzMT6K6FRSkqSpXxFXUR20EQKJPau5whfGFKcxqFhJAduSyJ81VAAwucPVoDGGoZwqsHmXh9xt0b9FUPRdgp3nFbk7nSvB0pbU3Anz9uO0PszKtgeyCNc.o0Zgfkn8aDa7_d1atVjGDcRUe5UbHLfVff9LyMD7kj9T1yKSKccAf0a0mp5V3JoiNOS8gWXBqpvXKyf9NejXHs_uwa_vmis- Received: from [216.145.54.7] by web56203.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:43:52 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1358.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 References: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 ----- Original Message ---- > From: Owen O'Malley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:42:08 AM > Subject: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org > > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have code > that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list with > only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The use of > the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from users so > that they can fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, > such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration for > 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it is > getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen From general-return-462-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 26 01:10:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24642 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2009 01:10:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2009 01:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 73055 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 01:11:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72978 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 01:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72967 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2009 01:11:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:11:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tzehon.tan@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.200] (HELO mail-pz0-f200.google.com) (209.85.222.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:11:04 +0000 Received: by pzk38 with SMTP id 38so1889393pzk.5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:10:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pABhwp619Gd4EuXIrc9x4feg5MVp8szvzAluMoCvbOU=; b=A3g8ptsWSPCtaY+ThR/p1kGUtorYW+JdUcPbAK63sHZQquOLQmSmbCkyDX7YfU9hwF Ub00sF1A2nWf++nyrDch2TzGmErykJ6lLZ+e4n5guiNJV65Cs+sqe4WafeVoacSGSCNY kNiJb6/8EhDEVAhmfmsXbm+gZctlHCtPcaFfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W/bUWQ2t7BboawSZYLhaq4uQbGNgjo3qhA7eweRlFPiuWtt5H9J5xSI6+IU4BPfLjz YRgt0K6KP7nexOolSj469Csdyu9g25GPvdyyMUCoiNc9QoOboo+9J+zPnPqpWeuV4wIO uY+Rn5ftiJa+ug0p28NzeN94Fw7F7k4/dASjw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.201.18 with SMTP id y18mr457614wff.257.1251249042944; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:10:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:10:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org From: Tze Hon Tan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd22a0cbaf4030472011ebc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd22a0cbaf4030472011ebc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have > code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list > with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The > use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from > users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on > public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration > for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it > is getting important to start closing the holes. > > -- Owen > --000e0cd22a0cbaf4030472011ebc-- From general-return-463-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 26 01:16:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25484 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2009 01:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2009 01:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 79245 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 01:16:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79155 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 01:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79145 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2009 01:16:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:16:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fzappert@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:16:27 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so1783025qwh.35 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i4pJQ+sNtU+vjdZb7p0DVm5jRjyTq7m1ZikCNMgs1Cc=; b=TLzStNdy7AefGMidlS5ffbQquVtpJJsB2nOFpGHUdufsXUASRlFinUSpSWQDenOXOR 9hJeAWLt2Hje3DuDG0NjosEie25CDVhvB3opB4yg9tzr4Dx6n1sw4nT1CwMlEjZCq4rZ Tl7QjwQ7Odii+8bA7yJJ0yjhZ3gdMIfjCXFbE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XAV3za119pdnuvIrKbOCtK3wpRGH0qsEFC6rGzb0YymIkNhdzrqSCSTCuUzekzav// TM4mplx+A1+8vticeALhql2sJ5svSlA81yYkdazQ2QnlTJHaO4nlif51HUpDKFMnb3Mk 7o95B3yGUWoI69Oo2izmx0wC7xinb/wBHSUTM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.16.73 with SMTP id n9mr1861517qca.70.1251249366537; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:16:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:16:06 -0700 Message-ID: <14048aeb0908251816h8d7c55o27632ec2b18ebcc6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org From: Fred Zappert To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb4ca04954604720132e9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cb4ca04954604720132e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 in general. +1 for Kerberos to handle authentication and authorization On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tze Hon Tan wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have > > code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on > > http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private > list > > with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. > The > > use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues > from > > users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on > > public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos > integration > > for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but > it > > is getting important to start closing the holes. > > > > -- Owen > > > --0015175cb4ca04954604720132e9-- From general-return-464-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 26 04:50:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97736 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2009 04:50:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2009 04:50:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 65984 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 04:50:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65666 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 04:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65640 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2009 04:50:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:50:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:50:45 +0000 Received: from traveling-laptop-66-251.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (socks3.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.54.15]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n7Q4o333013692 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:50:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XEALn49AuWrjTFjHEPMX0TFQHsYb/9OKbhgMIoYIK4kw5aAPPd+NR794XAA4S+Ry Message-ID: <4A94BEFA.6090303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:20:02 +0530 From: Hemanth Yamijala User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tze Hon Tan wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > >> With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have >> code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on >> http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private list >> with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. The >> use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues from >> users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on >> public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos integration >> for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but it >> is getting important to start closing the holes. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > > From general-return-465-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 26 17:58:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46371 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2009 17:58:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2009 17:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 17:58:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30098 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 17:58:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30088 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2009 17:58:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:58:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.191] (HELO mail-px0-f191.google.com) (209.85.216.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:58:07 +0000 Received: by pxi29 with SMTP id 29so350638pxi.30 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JTx96o/K+P+uRrDEeoHrrPUB44vqXqYqxY50F7lyvbs=; b=hM1DOosxPzdNZroXCKkwMWQzQTSR8LKuvlMkq7asBaqf53dPoBY0324ZRxIQ0urSCs qn4haYxxTsrMDQHV73n7zD2my0VNHsyOnLl00XRC4Ze5PNamrEgGiEUETUGRK5uVyytc ibdiFAVq6jLAAYbgBjJvo+ikZt7f7Gk03Ajns= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=m2ELgg0mfEaqSa1u4+JFFoLq+IBTU2qMGHdtpGsSRyUA71Jp/g4lNYMwddwn1WRPXb a/P1B494yK4HjSSxMJmQHnRWQ0dHxOk3R03ptyRhAb8iPkXVW5by5hhLnDQf+b+qUSVQ MjFYst/9vHBk8Ik22vEhQ6TLVndpiPgocs9EA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.192.11 with SMTP id p11mr3925788rvf.92.1251309467600; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A94BEFA.6090303@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4A94BEFA.6090303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:57:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70908261057j75f304den91da21148fdb7e84@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd20fa652069804720f302e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd20fa652069804720f302e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > +1 > > > Tze Hon Tan wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we have >>> code that is critical from a system security perspective. As outlined on >>> http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a private >>> list >>> with only committers that are working on the security aspects of Hadoop. >>> The >>> use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security issues >>> from >>> users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced on >>> public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. >>> >>> On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos >>> integration >>> for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in Hadoop, but >>> it >>> is getting important to start closing the holes. >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > --000e0cd20fa652069804720f302e-- From general-return-466-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 27 05:04:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54617 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2009 05:04:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 05:04:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 80491 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2009 05:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80341 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2009 05:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80331 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2009 05:04:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:04:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:04:19 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n7R53Z0D086232 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=RFX3IR5YWGxgBGrEalaOyBfrccKFlemhoPotfvrJw2Gvo4HVFHJChCU0ERecyNVi Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.185]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:03:36 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA26D3.B34FE854" Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:03:22 -0700 Message-ID: <2C52DBBEC4855C438BB330CB0D3B465903BFADEA@SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org thread-index: Acom07NGPNB/YjapSW20aEMfWfKMgA== From: "Sharad Agarwal" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2009 05:03:36.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[BBBF1EA0:01CA26D3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA26D3.B34FE854 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Hemanth Yamijala = wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> Tze Hon Tan wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Owen O'Malley >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we = have >>>> code that is critical from a system security perspective. As = outlined on >>>> http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will be a = private >>>> list >>>> with only committers that are working on the security aspects of = Hadoop. >>>> The >>>> use of the list will be strictly limited to collecting security = issues >>>> from >>>> users so that they can fixed and released before they are announced = on >>>> public forums, such as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. >>>> >>>> On a related note, my plan is to work on getting full Kerberos >>>> integration >>>> for 0.22. We've come a long way without any authentication in = Hadoop, but >>>> it >>>> is getting important to start closing the holes. >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA26D3.B34FE854-- From general-return-467-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 27 09:24:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33604 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2009 09:24:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2009 09:24:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 32853 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2009 09:24:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32785 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2009 09:24:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32775 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2009 09:24:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:24:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harshad@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:24:10 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1251969824.99942@01LAqnQRTzYcD9vuk7wl4w Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7R9Nf3i000696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:53:41 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id n7R9NfKS000650; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:53:41 +0530 From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to harshad@localhost using -f Received: from 172.17.11.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user harshad) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:53:41 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <47805.172.17.11.61.1251365021.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:53:41 +0530 (IST) Subject: Error in WordCount example in Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: amit_s@research.iiit.ac.in, srinivasg@students.iiit.ac.in, padmini_m@research.iiit.ac.in User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n7R9Nf3i000696 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5, No Hi all, When I execute this command on my Hadoop to execute the WordCount example " bin/hadoop jar wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount input output" it gives me the following exception: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.myorg.WordCount at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:323) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:268) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:336) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:158) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) Please help me out. Bye Harshad Shrikhande -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-468-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 28 17:19:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31959 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 17:19:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 17:19:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 22703 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 17:19:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22639 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 17:19:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22628 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2009 17:19:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:19:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:18:51 +0000 Received: from OMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zn3S1c00516LCl051tJW26; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:18:30 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZtJD1c00c2SbwD53StJG47; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:18:28 +0000 From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <47805.172.17.11.61.1251365021.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Subject: Re: Error in WordCount example in Hadoop X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <47805.172.17.11.61.1251365021.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:18:12 -0700 Cc: amit_s@research.iiit.ac.in, srinivasg@students.iiit.ac.in, padmini_m@research.iiit.ac.in X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 27, 2009, at 2:23 AM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: > Hi all, > > When I execute this command on my Hadoop to execute the WordCount > example Please move map/reduce user questions to mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org -- Owen From general-return-469-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 28 17:29:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45019 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 17:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 39303 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 17:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39232 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2009 17:29:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39222 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2009 17:29:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:29:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:29:34 +0000 Received: from OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zooo1c0031GXsucA4tVDfA; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:29:13 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZtV51c0082SbwD58TtV7rg; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:29:11 +0000 Message-Id: <14FF0B69-F0F4-4847-8B4B-1D2064558467@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] create security@hadoop.apache.org Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:29:04 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With the upcoming freeze of Map/Reduce 0.21, for the first time, we > have code that is critical from a system security perspective. As > outlined on http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html this will > be a private list with only committers that are working on the > security aspects of Hadoop. The use of the list will be strictly > limited to collecting security issues from users so that they can > fixed and released before they are announced on public forums, such > as jira. Clearly, I'm +1. With 13 +1's (7 from the PMC) and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll file the jira to create the lists. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2203 -- Owen From general-return-470-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 30 00:55:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62342 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2009 00:55:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2009 00:55:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 72600 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2009 00:55:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72517 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2009 00:55:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94280 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2009 21:05:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepak.halale@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ie0rv9DN6PKBHhRjUbJETtBm+B4GQrBGp5pXYC+YAYM=; b=mPu3UgpMb8Z0p5Z5hyL5X85eYWHD3oEGKqr9478fQ4gpIbmu3vbEI0NmUrmUvUTcMg K12uGdIQqkmy4oDxrG1YruoZf7DiVfxz0jzV972/3O1vvpunksenKy7i4/cx+zdHGUWF br3M6GhNR677Lu1klHIeqRVVht4PUN3qtJjaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TecKKW3mnGAENqsHFt9uRjwhYUUIIUj9LUDS5CrbFEqOfJMO/7ssj9nJErTawAXAM6 Ib6uZTZ1Buy++uZz+WpoJNr9T3aSsu3EvcPDPdL8E67JpQeXb3W7Un8VOauET9xDGd/u fkjvpquRbnEQH2BJL+XUN+rtigwC4JOPfhGa8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:04:35 -0400 Message-ID: <15678300908291404p5554c8ewda75d45d87bc5a75@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop mapReduce clarification From: Deepak Halale To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d783fcdf426604724e25a5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d783fcdf426604724e25a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi I am new to Hadoop and trying to write mapReduce job which gets data from database i.e x number of fields and then processes it . can you point me in direction where to get this information. I was able to run the example mapReduce wordcount sample on single machine , but not getting the gist how the data with mulitpe columns in the flat file or otherwise is processed Thank you Deepak H --0016e6d783fcdf426604724e25a5-- From general-return-471-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 30 03:41:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87957 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2009 03:41:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2009 03:41:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15785 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2009 03:41:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15646 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2009 03:41:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15625 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2009 03:41:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:41:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yeahyf@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.225] (HELO mail-fx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.220.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:41:40 +0000 Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so2251071fxm.29 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:41:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m4bBv+eFpDzf2Sp+8I1WB+ZmotsTrpGIuKvpUF3FRp4=; b=ICAD75RSfILB+hkZkJXREDdBTVNGQAOUOU0JN99Hile8mtBZYufrRiXDQVDvzgOEEB C3FzH5jypSm8VuY1ya8DK2C8+TE1Yxk4PcgojZ/MKpZoAGy7HQrvqNCucGkHH9B3xUH2 7MDh3ni53DJ7MygtKsf9LvNyVPX+yxdEPk16I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=q9yEd0EjrT9cGwFmfQ/SGe7yIX8o9o9mK1JJdcujeAZGsKuTiEVREshrVNYER3oso3 4BM6oE2+Yr3QEzicU0aJVWOV+7+fNYc236kIgoLVBSBHVndTpevGlZifN4vUXf0B0rMb kMSkCP9MDHdQS+ikgtNRkiO2ordwFncJZEpsg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.179.80 with SMTP id c16mr258364hbg.155.1251603680558; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:41:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <47805.172.17.11.61.1251365021.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:41:20 +0800 Message-ID: <3b13e4710908292041t45d16850q713768dcef59afae@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Error in WordCount example in Hadoop From: yangfeng To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7cc06c780a7047253b043 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f7cc06c780a7047253b043 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Before, please exec "export HADOOP_CLASSPATH=." 2009/8/29 Owen O'Malley > > On Aug 27, 2009, at 2:23 AM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: > > Hi all, >> >> When I execute this command on my Hadoop to execute the WordCount example >> > > Please move map/reduce user questions to mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org > > -- Owen > --001485f7cc06c780a7047253b043-- From general-return-98-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 04 21:05:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 84030 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2008 21:05:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2008 21:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5862 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5775 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5694 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:05:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.149] (HELO rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:03:56 +0000 Received: from [10.72.73.120] (snvvpn1-10-72-73-c120.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.73.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id mB4L3PbE057513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:03:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4938459D.9020401@apache.org> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:03:25 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.0.1. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. If you are upgrading from version 2.2.1 on SourceForge be sure to review the 3.0.1 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.0.1 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.0.1/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-99-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 08 19:07:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 62405 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2008 19:07:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2008 19:07:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 95201 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2008 19:07:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94809 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2008 19:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94694 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2008 19:07:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:07:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:06:48 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id mB8J680c024701; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=A2k5NMkYJGRv5NNLsanFFTOQ9LvUQxc7+NG7rVp8T2q0irxGZeEWT6bDJQN9eHaF Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:08 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C95968.07187B08" Subject: Pig 0.1.1 Released! Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:07 -0800 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE102F366E6@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Pig 0.1.1 Released! Thread-Index: AclZaAZ1zoQjfPbJQFu1+QFgGZ9uHg== From: "Olga Natkovich" To: , , , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2008 19:06:08.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[07194FE0:01C95968] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C95968.07187B08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Pig team is happy to announce Pig 0.1.1 release.=20 Pig is Hadoop subproject which provides high-level data-flow language and execution framework for parallel computation on Hadoop clusters. More details about Pig can be found at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/. The highlight of this release is integration with Hadoop 0.18. The details of the release can be found at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/releases.html. Olga ------_=_NextPart_001_01C95968.07187B08-- From general-return-100-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 21 18:38:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 86527 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2008 18:38:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2008 18:38:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 56490 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2008 18:38:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56468 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2008 18:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16326 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2008 09:37:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of samqjf@163.com designates 220.181.12.14 as permitted sender) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:36:46 +0800 From: "samqjf" To: general Subject: how to Learning the hadoop Message-ID: <200812201736252969570@163.com> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 9, 201, 16 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon046188523748_=====" X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUUYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUjSkYjxAI6xkYrwAYjxAI6xAIw28IcVAK0I8IjxAxM7k0a2IF6F1U M7kC6x804xWl14x267AKxVWUJVW8JwAFxVCF77xC6IxKo4kEV4yl1I0EscIYIxCEI4klw4 CSwwAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwAq048E620vw7xCY7CEYx808205XwAq048E620vw7xCY7CE 4x8GYI0EYx1l5I8CrVCF0I0E4I0vr24lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2js IE14v26r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4IEnf9ElVAFpTB2q-sK649IAas0WaI_GwCj xxvEa2IrMxkFs20EY4vE8sxKj4xv1wCY1Ik26cxK6xAEc7vF620IrwCY1Ik26cxK6s8Yrw CY02Avz4vE14v_GFWlc2IjII80xcxEwVAKI48JMxCjnVAqn7xvrwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v2 6r1j6r15Ms8CjcxG0xvEn4CqF7xvrbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUg4SrUUUUU X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=====003_Dragon046188523748_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to know what to do hadoop. What software can run on it? Where there are Chinese information about the hadoop? 2008-12-20 samqjf --=====003_Dragon046188523748_=====-- From general-return-101-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 21 18:56:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 89678 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2008 18:56:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2008 18:56:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 67033 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2008 18:56:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67008 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2008 18:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66996 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2008 18:56:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:56:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kerdezixe@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.21] (HELO mail-ew0-f21.google.com) (209.85.219.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:56:16 +0000 Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so1846701ewy.5 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:55:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=g4gr7Q+GI/JygIR8KZ6RDeE377HDeMseiknpges1BEQ=; b=bnkNyCVbaBiCFfZcyTiXVK9w57uBcavck8hwtE4ZLSSihhKmlzJLQHN2cMUC3pOi2g JGotKec0ncsxz2i3fI6jZe22TGW0jqOyTrALAmJagXeyCIeYDawD1LrYEg/eJDexEBu7 0QBnFXDYuju3YJCzfN+CUaeKsAYTdHETx9lEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dFhJd7znsYtxTboIA80EdsvePwTCDyv9V4i/+vIhr2ALDGaN7P6kFvFMAAsIJsOVo3 U5mX1KJVBpqcW4+JJmx6+GvmyR3gsUc+7iYiWTcq8K8Z8dXzSoeU/Yl/576mKyvFQmvk +tfZ3Dae+2mo2p/kkPNkliQRdu7sMMorGcaCc= Received: by 10.210.67.4 with SMTP id p4mr6420772eba.157.1229885755580; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.54.16 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:55:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8a1bfe660812211055g651dc688p2f0d8c38bc87cccc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:55:55 +0100 From: "Laurent Laborde" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: how to Learning the hadoop In-Reply-To: <200812201736252969570@163.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200812201736252969570@163.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, samqjf wrote: > > Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to know what to do hadoop. What software can run on it? Hi ! I'm still new to hadoop, but you can do a lot of things with it. The 2 keys of hadoop are : - HDFS : A distributed filesystem, something similar to the Google FileSystem. - MapReduce : Well... there is a lot of paper about mapreduce. (mostly from Google, they "invented" it). As long as you have a small (a few MB) or a very large dataset (Many TB, PB ?) and a problem that can be parallised with MapReduce, Hadoop may be for you :) Hadoop have some very interesting Subprojects if you're not planning to deal directly with MapReduce task. - HBase : an implementation of Google BigTable. - Pig : i don't know how to explain it, but i'm crazy about it. it's really cool. Very usefull for, eg : parsing huge file (log file, text, csv, ...), filter, group, order, ... - Hutsh : A search engine ... that use Lucene and hadoop. Something similar to Google Search ;) - and more ... I suggest to read the Google papers about mapreduce, bigtable, GFS. Papers about hadoop Paper about the many subprojects of hadoop. Please correct me if i'm wrong, i'm still newbie here :) (so far... the most i did was a search engine with around 2 millions URL indexed). I'm expecting to use it at work for log parsing. (webiste with millons of hits/day). But not yet, i'm just playing with hadoop for now :) -- F4FQM Kerunix Flan Laurent Laborde From general-return-102-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 26 19:42:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 57127 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2008 19:42:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 2008 19:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 89582 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2008 19:42:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89556 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2008 19:42:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89545 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2008 19:42:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:42:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [96.9.130.69] (HELO sophia.codeminders.com) (96.9.130.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:42:08 +0000 Received: from [10.86.81.100] (dsl092-248-163.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.248.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sophia.codeminders.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA4A8186D for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:41:53 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Vadim Zaliva To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-70-757718558; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: cluster machines dying Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:41:45 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-70-757718558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! I am experiencing a strange problem with hadoop-0.19. I have set up small cluster with 4 machines. These are older machines, which have been under heavy use for years. Once I have started to run hadoop on them they unexplainably die after approximately 24 hours of use. I have not even run any tasks on they yet. They are now accumulating some data files, being copied in DFS. There is nothing in syslog prior to the crash. Memory usage is moderate (no swap is used). CPU load is under 1. Does anybody seen something like this? What steps I could take to diagnose this problem further? Thanks! Sincerely, Vadim P.S. Java version: java version "1.6.0_11" Kernel: Linux datamining1 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux -- "La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien a ajouter, mais quand il ne reste rien a enlever." (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) --Apple-Mail-70-757718558 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGQDCCAvkw ggJioAMCAQICEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA4MDgwNDE4MDY1MloXDTA5MDgwNDE4MDY1 MlowXTEPMA0GA1UEBBMGWmFsaXZhMQ4wDAYDVQQqEwVWYWRpbTEVMBMGA1UEAxMMVmFkaW0gWmFs aXZhMSMwIQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhRsb3JkQGNvZGVtaW5kZXJzLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJp/hSCd9qKL3z67jLQ/rBeXMRgkL43ZL7wTXjUnS8OfVGYeRT2jLN06 JEouCV0ndiQwDT1Am8xq2IdZC1h/CEZJGrvj663uvrxFCadh2pqT2pFnq7VCiBsekFyc/uhE8NOF It8doKZmzKrQQJ2iX94EdhEIP/mACO3+n9j0TBqSa7z4hfn8DYNW6MkZX4VGlcAm/d3ueTlcoiQ5 lrcTw3i5aK4SBTiReLaHQKoyU2FYvk0A3728MQjcU4sIJDpUTKCnzLMLmJHaSgdq9Ey7nDSUKb0F CHVjsgp+dr/6ozRgmvIcs+WfEo1ELBuFfi+U6ESXlOy26qH3coOS7LXT9gsCAwEAAaMxMC8wHwYD VR0RBBgwFoEUbG9yZEBjb2RlbWluZGVycy5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOBgQCbuIPK+DCnk/9WGG2Wv1kdmqj41IjBR7oXQ5GsWfDi6uKGWdzz/Z628YcirynXqr3bgJze IvJ5XbkFuGe0SHl5HsXtKBeTNjqBS+lZQ8+eXkxuJTrFGzvn72EhY1E1NmYntVaCblizQmZIu/aq zScU5ibqWqntjn8P7Iu3GSE9QTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3 MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5 KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCBnzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9VvyGna9 fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0Dviv+ uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNVHRMB Af8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3 dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgG A1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcP f6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH 2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8x ggMQMIIDDAIBATB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQ REyhjgt+jtruwuGAot4tyzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBbzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcB MBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wODEyMjYxOTQxNDVaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQ9CZgpmeZf619C T+CDb9ihdEQY3DCBhQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMXgwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcswgYcGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMXigdjBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcsw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAQB/kQA+lGNjfj/nRsZYpZlMenH/nXstmmDokTBFMb1iu3u+XUc67 tf1hJB3vpFXuYZ7zq6qxXiM/5nwiwWF5QCD7oflHMlqFrs22QtfXt3jjHNXJYjinPnLbwx2EWwd4 MQt9CgFYQXDPY4YBWGKZOPxXpiw9bsGwrN8ZPjRxyP/zeH2KeqVuhJBt9WRYQwNZghsErgZ/hfc2 M8UvsSmEZlOP3O0gyq8V6Qb/QOfgPRFZtlFO5kww4FLqu/OF46SMi+IYqqhvys7szm5YQSo1u1hp 4v0IJ0kwkbSvRqqek+LE9AYNA0aER7gecKagucNCwMeBEiHizmSexL9FX5EXDgAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-70-757718558-- From general-return-1722-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 01 05:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20274 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 05:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 05:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 56628 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 05:24:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56318 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 05:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56310 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 05:24:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:24:03 +0000 Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2089415iwn.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CzXMv/X/txZZItX+Rm+O7/CBqHm9J/OrzGR8QK9nx60=; b=A7W+FrJLB7GbPx6p9EV/FjF5M9vAaeaG/zCsp1US+NuV5zRS/BK+Po58jPifMgXOp7 KLYrsi3GrkAvBckZzRkyKS7+VTxKCqbrXPlwh9qvtuR757y0AKwOXRU5jXISnE5/tSm4 q1xdp/SVsMiQqpdc00Liu1XCn6A1mXhAKO4WY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FPjbTFlxA9HKbNBD+3X2fAgxK8u3zWlKl4bhB0odNk8h4nbkMJmobeQghuYLW6Gs/l f6IdpIGKfDAhfAOcunWUSpmXuPI3be0GGlAx7PD5EsZh9AtgHFePvqNHD/iIkd4rhJj6 BBYXnS3yxAlj7MY3My8RGbFiPVk/HCVIzab08= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.169.74 with SMTP id x10mr10291542iby.121.1277961822806; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.33.200 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <30B5A69F3E33FE4C83F4C832F5D6E2CF0254F734@CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:23:42 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Platform From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369c8ab27c2564048a4cac2b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016369c8ab27c2564048a4cac2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks everybody, I will definitely try to get in contact with OpenCirrus, and if not I can a= t least test with some amazon hw so I can prove the application concept. And the Whirr project is really interesting, I will give it a look specially because we really don't want to depend on a single service provider. Thanks again for the suggestions. Renato M. 2010/6/30 Jeff Hammerbacher > If you want to use an open API and be cloud-provider agnostic, check out > Whirr: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/whirr.html. > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Yan, Weizhong (GE, Research) > wrote: > > > Why don't you just simply try Amazon elastic MapReduce? > > http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo [mailto:renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:47 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Hadoop Platform > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a > "cloud" > > for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions > materialised? > > or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test > Hadoop > > jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but= I > > don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to te= st > > them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Renato M. > > > --0016369c8ab27c2564048a4cac2b-- From general-return-1723-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 01 06:42:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45506 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 06:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 06:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22260 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 06:42:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21794 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 06:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21785 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 06:42:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.172] (HELO web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:42:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 53053 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jul 2010 06:40:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1277966435; bh=DTN5iQ/XmCC4leYsRyWsfZNsUc5w5XmtE5PQS4tuumw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=va76FPDEEpVczUu4ZSGPUUYiQivnNZdOTqx9F2r3w67K5gxNfPR/J0iqBN7a1MI0QYtxzRBgqW4fncU3T1GKeettNgkv++KjNqC0/h4bmgmI56SvWfxQdq5AkRbxta2Fv0DTjZ/poXl9ZZ6Epvlf+gMN72tBGCz5OAfVsiZiLig= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5tAsdZ/xQXZBGPtQdo40H3zL8867ATUBlbtlWItui1EdDx4MSFzohXPu9acqSOzMN//xdLSj9pUwbFrhohUOfkol+swxiEXNMtNZI4RHNOWBnN+IaEKJ4VZWSaAyAbnkY/2GWprRlp9WUO8j27dfNRza3cK4hNPM3q8ZKXGCckY=; Message-ID: <699135.52032.qm@web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: C6Nly2QVM1lztWj.IlWHpvTq4DfHVEuSIwNuqDBVMo87H52 fSlsc6vtgxhZbQgqXnfvZLdSe64GWv6tTw2JTKTIT9Uyf0VR50opNIogLbxW PXz8woJ0MJIWrMYG1KaMUUMq1GmTycEKIT5210eGhy5gfAR2w6tFsidXSZOC 2uPozq7zDR7hb4aoN_zbZDmCSYAA_nIimsIisvwQJfmL99Rej1YULkTXZrAS UK9JQIu8ZwAKTtRZ2LEdplV7snqo8_tIr.L_8Jrn9tfiqKqc496IcT2kyRyz R7n5heZQLqfVftdVrt6N5WVd8JPw- Received: from [188.74.76.16] by web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:40:35 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:40:35 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Chaining Map-Reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1002225173-1277966435=:52032" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1002225173-1277966435=:52032 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi everyone, I know that it is possible in Hadoop 0.19 and onwards to have any number of mappers, then a reducer, and then any number of mappers chained in a single job. Is it possible to have more than one reducers in this chain? If yes, how?? Thanks --0-1002225173-1277966435=:52032-- From general-return-1724-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 01 12:48:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 357 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 12:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 12:48:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 67811 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 12:48:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67655 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 12:48:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67646 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 12:48:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:48:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:48:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A112EB7CF8 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:47:39 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FMozr8ZZlj8i for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:47:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3565B7CEA for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:47:38 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1278593246.49046@mT4r/Skfz20V8zgUMMSjOw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o61ClOW4005760 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:47:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C2C8E5C.8070305@apache.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:47:24 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Platform References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o61ClOW4005760 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Renato, > >> I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a "cloud" >> for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions materialised? >> or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test Hadoop >> jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but I >> don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to test >> them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: >> Thanks in advance. > > Can you check if OpenCirrus (https://opencirrus.org/) can fit your > bill ? It seems like some one like a faculty member can request access > by submitting a proposal. > The problem that OpenCirrus and presumably whatever IBM and Google are doing is that it has to be research; the funding/tax situation doesn't let you do "product" or "play"; this is why we can't use those boxes for beta-testing Hadoop 0.21 unless we have a dataset and app that really is research. The other one is datasets, nobody wants to dedicate PB of storage to individual project's datasets, far easier to have shared datasets of one form or other. what OpenCirrus do offer is the ability not just to run MR jobs over a cluster but the ability to rededicate a chunk of physical datacentre (not virtualised, real machines) to different uses. Which means you need a process for allocating machines, getting your research done on them etc. It's very biased towards "research of what the future of cloud computing" will be, rather than just "some boxes to run MR jobs on". If you do have some interesting ideas in that area, and you are at a research establishment which is part of the consortium, then yes, try and get some of the machines. From general-return-1725-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 01 12:54:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1802 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 12:54:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 12:54:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 76987 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 12:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76775 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 12:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76767 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 12:54:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:54:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE25B7E61 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:54:15 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KKVvML1LB8bR for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:54:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5F3B7E28 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:54:14 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1278593641.86013@tyA6HuJyGJCRH4OiESj/vQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o61Cs0wC005866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:54:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C2C8FE9.1040706@apache.org> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:54:01 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop Platform References: <30B5A69F3E33FE4C83F4C832F5D6E2CF0254F734@CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o61Cs0wC005866 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo wrote: > Thanks everybody, > > I will definitely try to get in contact with OpenCirrus, and if not I can at > least test with some amazon hw so I can prove the application concept. There's a lot to be said for bringing up 3 or 4 virtualbox or vmware VMs and playing with that locally, as it does make sure that you have distribution right. CPU performance on VMs is pretty good, it's only disk IO that (currently) suffers. >And > the Whirr project is really interesting, I will give it a look specially > because we really don't want to depend on a single service provider. > Thanks again for the suggestions. I've been doing some work on GUIs/tooling too; this is something that could really front end what whirr does, though it also needs a cross-infrastructure HA story for managing the persistent data the tooling needs too -user accounts, current set of machines, etc etc. http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/farming-hadoop-inthecloud > > > Renato M. > > > 2010/6/30 Jeff Hammerbacher > >> If you want to use an open API and be cloud-provider agnostic, check out >> Whirr: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/whirr.html. >> >> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Yan, Weizhong (GE, Research) >> wrote: >> >>> Why don't you just simply try Amazon elastic MapReduce? >>> http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo [mailto:renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:47 AM >>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>> Subject: Hadoop Platform >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a >> "cloud" >>> for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions >> materialised? >>> or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test >> Hadoop >>> jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but I >>> don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to test >>> them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> >>> Renato M. >>> > From general-return-1726-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 01 15:16:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50193 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 15:16:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 15:16:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 95489 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95274 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95266 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 15:16:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.216.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.216.154] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.216.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:16:20 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o61FFveQ028767 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from apache@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.4/Submit) id o61FFv54028765 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:15:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: apache set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from proxyout.lanl.gov (proxyout.lanl.gov [192.12.184.2]) by mail.cs.ucf.edu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:15:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20100701111557.87054g9doprm1kow@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:15:57 -0400 From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce References: <699135.52032.qm@web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <699135.52032.qm@web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 Look at the cascade project -->http://www.cascading.org/ - Grant Quoting abc xyz : > Hi everyone, > > I know that it is possible in Hadoop 0.19 and onwards to have any number of > mappers, then a reducer, and then any number of mappers chained in a > single job. > Is it possible to have more than one reducers in this chain? If yes, how?? > > Thanks > > > > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From general-return-1727-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 03:03:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78453 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 03:03:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 03:03:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 9649 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 03:03:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9406 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 03:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9398 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 03:02:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:02:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:02:51 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so220450qyk.14 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/+9UvD0g9tBHVZHqPdt8HwkS6Tn500dDVrptxJe0oX8=; b=F33MgoA4BICiTbFt77WOfCqHz967qjJLfbby93fmBJVPUYtqG2dnDvoi7k4cXJtlQd JYXXi+W+/PS6UKdch/y6sKu0kO37C6qVt+9GpDBkmwMb2osTEpivga/N1fdvwtXayp80 f64TXY97YJJWNM2BOWFGOUZ1sXqi9B9kNsqq0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HcNPL/uDjhYEP3WtxH6aGm7Micr1IDIUSHQGtObmmspfvVW0b+g80o/J+EtVF3zlLB sZGHlZnSjOYwufyxIy5q1mfswgbXa/5ukqjg2vPwWcjQrAgfo/8xda9ofV6w6ghssKIN TUTsw4Y2n235KyJm4wZIJME76ZqouIksnWYzQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.28.78 with SMTP id l14mr19895qac.31.1278039750591; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.134 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:02:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: problem starting cdh3b2 jobtracker From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce08c57c4af048a5ed11e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ce08c57c4af048a5ed11e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We installed cdh3b2 0.20.2+320 and saw some strange error in jobtracker log: 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker up at: 9001 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker webserver: 50030 2010-07-02 01:49:31,988 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Error starting tracker: java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in /data1/mapred/local at org.apache.hadoop.util.MRAsyncDiskService.(MRAsyncDiskService.java:85) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1688) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) 2010-07-02 01:49:32,990 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Scheduler configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) 2010-07-02 01:49:32,991 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: java.net.BindException: Problem binding to sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1.ciq.com/10.201.8.204:9001: Address already in use at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:198) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:261) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:1043) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.(RPC.java:492) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getServer(RPC.java:454) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1628) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:119) at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:196) ... 8 more 2010-07-02 01:49:32,992 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: SHUTDOWN_MSG: But 9001 wasn't used: [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25618]netstat -nta | grep 9001 [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25619]netstat -nta | grep 9000 tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.214:4223 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.212:49074 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.206:11910 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.210:62611 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.213:1299 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.205:9756 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.207:59207 ESTABLISHED Here is output from ifconfig: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 inet addr:10.201.8.204 Bcast:10.201.8.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 (111.7 GiB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 (111.7 GiB) Interrupt:161 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 UP BROADCAST SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:169 Has anyone encountered similar issue ? --0015175ce08c57c4af048a5ed11e-- From general-return-1728-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 06:15:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23693 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 06:15:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 06:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5769 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 06:15:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5497 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 06:15:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5484 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 06:15:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:15:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:14:56 +0000 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so289238qyk.14 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:13:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z6EwRxpL+L8fXYpexHkXFSrePams1QsdTpKMMFtOtvg=; b=PhU6paSlxidd0cE889l06YdKJu1IzEF0hme+6RNAeKJgBEURz1nW3T+32iklS+afV/ oKAGV2OM4XFBzD3We5Z/9OacD9O0valyKDiTAUSs3kzurjaB9i/t6bh2ivfcVzdlkMyA Yx0SGKXmN7P71wEGsm+mxczpuX9d+h9PRqxDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kZtKkDslC+Cp9+QM1J/GKBeVtdjm2cxy/3JeHnoOJqSyhY+uD9Njqh0rQ6zmov/uPK JE6P5LrCgXPjzqAFRga4VIAo/C3WN/rbeaAI36dNQAJI4hYoTyU/a/be2pqfdP523BAR 9suV7ViodaKn0ufEJu6hPHcQwAj6Jd32NqVb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.87.6 with SMTP id u6mr96737qal.214.1278051215262; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 23:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:13:35 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f99e549b0c5ec048a617cb5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f99e549b0c5ec048a617cb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. >From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a file in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. When write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of them simultaneously. Is this right? --00c09f99e549b0c5ec048a617cb5-- From general-return-1729-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:18:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49191 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:18:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:18:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 69819 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:18:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69510 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:18:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69497 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:18:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:18:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.173] (HELO web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:18:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 62799 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jul 2010 07:17:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278055028; bh=2pjE1hcZ5fN30DboLRlCkLuP4upt7/TyCFhn1b1OjLM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4PTdjqyGAIkMMGc64yMBcsgOA2E9/JCg/JXxFNLeN0s2bvxA//GW4Ico34pOpKmzNImqmJU+sdmAiGhBuolkAC4swAsrctycaID+nJxgCGIiIoTkrQMOOfYoY3JV69LrZE8S/k5yuZHl2lCMpJlt4slT3xDfUCFlnIbm9a9CoD4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B1DB2D4XXU7gncemxXnNy/Tghwuk8CGUVR22F92C25k+6oKB2UenMSC2nDAGZU25l4sAncrxj1Pau1IzPso7nkbMRA667gZEkgCrqiMMLcPfB9lzC/oT396urzLqXWelBmAvcwnWbhMtNUHrc8XPuLlg6/N4H0AOcgbIgPpwE2M=; Message-ID: <351370.62305.qm@web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KuE8xV4VM1lx9U2El9C.uow_CVZaa_4zmBVdh3XsJwKpGeb nEBLgcvREemc7IkmVQvfHrKabMGaGbvVyjQxcmgSEG.UQh64fVdb.JdbdykG aBOwVYnBvFrtL5jBfWHaxNWQaEbapkCeHTu3lPwaQtb2d1.nCMtnPm8.CuGO drHmEKwO02MNwUFmRtniRlV1UGTVNraayMogXygUHIT7S5JOEhq1a266WX_a yB12lpn.VhxDyKAH7AKcmvDbpCSHcDYiDDx2py4vdEqab6.knyku6CKHgrHx coZpPlTXWzPw7YSWcafEqCZ4xYhf0Y4Ck2SveK4aXTFwnHyEKPLBpdvJj1eQ h1GSQcRyuuBoLHA-- Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:17:08 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 References: <699135.52032.qm@web46307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20100701111557.87054g9doprm1kow@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:17:08 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20100701111557.87054g9doprm1kow@mail.cs.ucf.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1835254229-1278055028=:62305" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1835254229-1278055028=:62305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Grant, but i want to do it without using any external library. Is there some way of it to have more than one reducers in a single job? ________________________________ From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 4:15:57 PM Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce Look at the cascade project -->http://www.cascading.org/ - Grant Quoting abc xyz : > Hi everyone, > > I know that it is possible in Hadoop 0.19 and onwards to have any number of > mappers, then a reducer, and then any number of mappers chained in a > single job. > Is it possible to have more than one reducers in this chain? If yes, how?? > > Thanks > > > > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. --0-1835254229-1278055028=:62305-- From general-return-1730-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:22:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49648 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 74872 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74691 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:22:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74683 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:22:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:22:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.176] (HELO web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:21:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 62940 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jul 2010 07:20:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278055234; bh=zXA7QJdIOFuXk1Ow0e3ZFz4PjUGKcYsvhGCd4i77ZdA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oRv/ujMYpTvpdDb1g9ZkY0ib30/j4FsvM1Z1ZLz50qc6Y1hUMtUaMci646QTpPisHpWG6VvQ/KXlRzGMZaSrxOXw0kWtfGejAmSwJbzaVdixEPamdLZGUcOkVwTR01rBJv2/qZE+bXT61/bf8JWCzDrH32Am3EigCsvJUbDo1ew= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1pjfuuhFToTZwyJjnL+7apTDonDcoc7ZMfqDgjUOTzM/xZJmWMb8An34trBd/blm8hM7Hc+py9044TeBOP/6P4u6Wv+t2k495vopLp1d+M965z8A979ElIpvFeWkk8PWXH62+cFrmVGXxv3/saNcp5JjvObhZLkKJhOzkyLrZUw=; Message-ID: <447928.62922.qm@web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hGsG6pMVM1kjr..fAQ5TiO4kFd1VM1WkU0270zedQvW6QLE ua9yazIqMxIo0xtHUcW7WY8IRlb60s5TwTbOVmUnCC3kd0I3PBC5pBio9vBI eyUQkKVJexVx5CDSOuXtM73ybgO9gKCPBu5L_k.hAVyM.ZVwfpv8Rgrs4PND CYs8.yJLgCbBvHtpxIizTjnRrfF4nNxySputPMCHpzY3Zc8u7TTRLo7jWeyC v4S3fFx8vPaIfDZAYooi58PXX7PGP55JzCfraJETe8g6A2Q3hMyoDOfAabqb _7ggrlw82875cCrpqT80QaFTvEZT5D7JRAQ8- Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:20:33 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:20:33 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Displaying Map output in MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1345269571-1278055233=:62922" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1345269571-1278055233=:62922 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi folks, I want to just display the output of my mapper on console or want to log it in some file. System.out.println and Log4j's logger are not displaying the output. How can I see the intermediate results? Cheers --0-1345269571-1278055233=:62922-- From general-return-1731-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:33:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53047 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 90865 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89298 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88585 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:33:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:33:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:32:58 +0000 Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2765232fxm.35 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5qoEL1h+v7isT8MJUL7lEqUFwj/s3Fc/F+cfhkPSpyI=; b=uQHDLYdnlmbh39Qbo6ZQG8B+W9hLyeSx79wKeuqJ0BRkA7JG6OyjNhCcsmOJGIthuq 2hE3Nf38sh+cDWhzxkJvXeRxJJA3L/QPH2tIYWU+1Rvhq80ITyNIqNhblpz7OpwRWjy7 P16pJon3MQNF+EFW5GUFSP+4WF8vnEu0EmEaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hcBzKnosaT/i6K0SSEwY5/Nc7rC2JDyGa7ecvSemyEOU7PCaOncA1tuBC5ueRUDAFg iH0rnhaLDtZo2dj7BAUPSIKmIBeyL+zizwA2wqlKBEMW1jSiFXx47qSdIEqjHorYHOiH SH+R2pnOK6H/qf4pLsuUegERkQ81dWdaNfPZE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.173.6 with SMTP id a6mr84487mup.116.1278055957366; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.5.16 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:32:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <447928.62922.qm@web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <447928.62922.qm@web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:32:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Displaying Map output in MapReduce From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163642741b5788b6048a62975b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163642741b5788b6048a62975b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Supposing that you=B4re using a virtualized environment, you should be able to get to JobTracker Web Admin Interface from http://:50070/logs/userlogs. In case you=B4re running Hadoop from insid= e a cluster frontend, use this machine=B4s IP. Inside this directory, it will exist another one called "userlogs" where you will see all map and reduce tasks launch by the JobTracker and the TaskTrackers. These tasks will look like 'job_[m,r]_0_xxxxxx' (or similar). Inside of every one of them there will be three subdirectories (stdout, stdlog and stderr) which will contain all your debugging messages. Inside my MapReduce development programs I use the Java *LOG* class in a sentence like this: private static final Log LOG =3D LogFactory.getLog(.class.getName()); LOG.info("***********INSIDE MY REDUCER SETUP**********"); Besides these messages, a normal "System.out.println(...)" will also appear in the above directories. Hope it helps! 2010/7/2 abc xyz > Hi folks, > > I want to just display the output of my mapper on console or want to log = it > in > some file. System.out.println and Log4j's logger are not displaying the > output. > How can I see the intermediate results? > > Cheers > > > --=20 Alberto --00163642741b5788b6048a62975b-- From general-return-1732-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:39:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55419 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:39:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:39:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 97591 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:39:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97365 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97357 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:39:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:39:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:39:41 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o627bYUH091596 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=w4hkYqRrz2WWaStttGndaSHpxZlPu64uFXhlKAVUAs83IqTMQbybLTNwMOffPgPd Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:07:33 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:07:01 +0530 Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce Thread-Topic: Chaining Map-Reduce Thread-Index: AcsZtuLbL6HZO4+TS9Kdd6/YMnG1OgAAnjwl Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <351370.62305.qm@web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C85394F53AB34svenkatyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C85394F53AB34svenkatyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You could use ChainMapper and ChainReducer API in hadoop. --_000_C85394F53AB34svenkatyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1733-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:45:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56770 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:45:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:45:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 11093 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:45:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10817 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:45:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10809 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:45:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:45:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fariha.atta.pk@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:45:32 +0000 Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2776615fxm.35 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bH0kHhmqG0mHonO1aRfyxZDVS9jvC1R5wtD1zOpJiVk=; b=QrbiYOjFPPr3YvnCiq8W3ETBJ6XZ5eKeV2a/PJXLSPCwACNYeRQYWI3da3aAIIdAbT zWxHiOxuXpigK+JKu8tNLoTyG4SMJ3EGQVemAQU+4zrN/D7u8vvdz0W51BtABs1FO00i qSlCMQ5LDHYdxrWiGzFV6lmKzY2EjgZgXP8/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RC+uS47QB4BSEpskYdO9uxdQakLfeachFxfANrL9Jhqrkwwp45Fo6Xs1hjg4zMOKJ6 QIqjbY8gSfljQXxH4YwvGDHe9aRe2hOwHIwRvVATJrYTPQzAf7Bf8yW3kYkcqrEswFuj d2gy5wPa7gL9Nzd3W8fBsYfCFTQJDOi46QBT0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.103.80 with SMTP id j16mr311768fao.34.1278056712098; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.19.5 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:45:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <351370.62305.qm@web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:45:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce From: Fariha Atta To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163684820253d5b0048a62c48a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163684820253d5b0048a62c48a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But it provides chaining like Map+ | Reduce | Map* i.e. we can use only one reducer. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Venkatesh S wrote: > You could use ChainMapper and ChainReducer API in hadoop. > --00163684820253d5b0048a62c48a-- From general-return-1734-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 07:57:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59005 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 07:57:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 07:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 24598 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:57:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24336 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 07:57:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24327 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 07:57:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:57:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 07:57:14 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so2444594pxi.35 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oj418F9gDqL3oCY4Doyo5hbAxaSvGP9ZLbyoxEC47bM=; b=KaoUOJ9pjYjoAi4jmVuxe0OJti3QTSXckp1+8xiKxm73cP4+L8BPQLm95xlrz4jC4p +o/9+kU0z21ocWiIoj5KaFyyWYqQtn+6Zx2ai/URrGJKECjcm6V8F2sCxB8KQWo8tSEN 4C/JmSAHQpw3o0RPrXeFAPmlDE+REvLEZDZ2I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=didIBwgrpLJGK8CLeBxZYTtEYTxZObi0MuDl8AtHnQ4K2ofqhUZimIpvEUSTihxCqr tF9EC+Z+8bRgTgyJwtBmgtWytfXIG9cdlEWAP6eosNxYJ1Jg5fc5riXDKF8I2XYEkIFK KtC21cc5U+IpX40COFgFwTi9kdzrr4C38Inj8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.163.15 with SMTP id l15mr519976wfe.97.1278057352391; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:25:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect the most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that list. Hemanth On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky wrote: > I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. > > From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. > Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a file > in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. > When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. When > write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of them > simultaneously. > > Is this right? > From general-return-1735-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 08:15:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66413 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 08:15:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 08:15:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 43239 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 08:15:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42922 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 08:15:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42913 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 08:15:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:15:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.177] (HELO web46312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:15:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 7642 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jul 2010 08:14:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278058478; bh=NB3PSDOzCdgNQwZbEDfPW4uUg6PmfFkF5GgVhR2pPt4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nDpb3KYWj+pmEOvaaadj4MnA7ZFO8h5kRrJuNGfs9TQwZmldjFRPWRb2uNS+QSWv59nqjqFudBJin8zK1jMl2UmlpsMs7WsWhgWueJ0BtqtkAC30hmC/hMaVcWiwFqRsfVDmV731cRM63zdg8NjGu1Ev+vPQpRWdDOkRyh5tGmM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SglJeYrGjfhlF6P2Nt+9byLjdK2aUyMGbIoiCvMq94N1d+NEOJCM61jw4XROq5BT+WjL4xD07FWziA3POZ/of1mbmNBOYXxOGzSz5OqfElZYaOfXqiLU9tVL8KzePUyYVuaT3VqNgQZb9sC1uAnkeEUgHlboVNvJmbVfagk5zO8=; Message-ID: <790746.6243.qm@web46312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: uZBA7EwVM1lsWjXav57mxyCp2iX5uiEe7cEwcjUFw9Qt20V 7WJWuojYoDZ1Uf9P9yAi2sq5566YC5wFMgo8zxqTHVe6CCwHT.vX8rwPok9t QHSBR_GYkiu3Sy7tRqUMrKq8B8rFuA5EHOvl1ZHfYwKsr4Q6o1KFaXdkVNPH HVZNLZ863pMMxhW4KmSWMg.C0MiwwclTKA0H5ampSb14dsCbevHKL_.AvVWM hVOzgoLNXYIu3c6RTMteMRWYjHoL8AQjAj_O1si4sRkMhTRvPG8WXJ.u9sy2 QbS9Y68izsDOcPpkL9OLeL1hsb.sY1JjZgpk- Received: from [129.215.149.98] by web46312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:14:38 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 References: <351370.62305.qm@web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 01:14:38 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-445714589-1278058478=:6243" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-445714589-1278058478=:6243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii one option can be to use multiple chained jobs using JobControl object. But can anyone tell whether in this case the output of first job be written to the disk? Actually I want to minimize access to the disk. Cheers ________________________________ From: Fariha Atta To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:45:12 AM Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce But it provides chaining like Map+ | Reduce | Map* i.e. we can use only one reducer. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Venkatesh S wrote: > You could use ChainMapper and ChainReducer API in hadoop. > --0-445714589-1278058478=:6243-- From general-return-1736-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 11:47:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20422 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 11:47:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 11:47:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 71495 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 11:47:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71068 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 11:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71060 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 11:47:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:47:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:47:39 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.38952284; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:47:14 -0700 Received: from eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 04:47:14 -0700 Received: from EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com ([169.254.1.214]) by eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:47:12 -0500 From: "Kilbride, James P." To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:47:08 -0500 Subject: HBASE/HADOOP Examples Thread-Topic: HBASE/HADOOP Examples Thread-Index: AcsZ3E1BbdniIUrQRCK6gI8frlWefQ== Message-ID: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA0A5@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {C6F21294-460D-4787-91F0-33C25FE572A6} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: fSI= B9Gj CoLf DEh6 Er2i F/+x GVTk Hqa+ H81C I7DN JEtY JIxi KuF3 Lequ LwZo MDYX;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{C6F21294-460D-4787-91F0-33C25FE572A6};agBhAG0AZQBzAC4AawBpAGwAYgByAGkAZABlAEAAZwBkAC0AYQBpAHMALgBjAG8AbQA=;Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:47:08 GMT;SABCAEEAUwBFAC8ASABBAEQATwBPAFAAIABFAHgAYQBtAHAAbABlAHMA acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2010 11:47:14.0080 (UTC) FILETIME=[504B4200:01CB19DC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've found examples using the older mapred interface but not the newer mapr= educe interface. I want to write a mapper that is configured to only pull o= ut specific rows(which are the mapper's keys) and a specific column's value= (which is the mapper's value). Is there any examples of something like this available? James Kilbride From general-return-1737-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 13:27:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50588 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 13:27:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 13:27:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 94835 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 13:27:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94495 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 13:27:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94487 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 13:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:27:06 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o62D6Rb4004381 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:06:27 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 471E04048C1B for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:26:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id Zfb41WqyQKH8ScLX for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:26:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o62DQMr4025256 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:26:23 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:26:22 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:26:21 -0500 Subject: RE: Why single thread for HDFS? Thread-Topic: Why single thread for HDFS? Thread-Index: AcsZvDbvoaWZhLY8R8mjH+zHQq9A5AAKf4wA Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help this = problem? I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some specific = client code which is being run on a client outside of the cloud/cluster..= =2E. I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on diffe= rent JVMs. ;-) Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes wit= hin the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per block. You can w= rite your own splitter to increase this and then get more parallelism.=20 HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? Hi, Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect the most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that list. Hemanth On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky wrote= : > I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. > > From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. > Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a f= ile > in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. > When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. = When > write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of th= em > simultaneously. > > Is this right? > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1738-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 15:25:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78623 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 15:25:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 15:25:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 21917 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 15:25:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21782 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 15:25:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21769 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 15:25:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:25:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:25:43 +0000 Received: by pzk35 with SMTP id 35so1130850pzk.35 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2o/LEMnqbAzZW5HwfmRtwgVZ6sSvaErPSk/OYEj60k8=; b=rTj50XAvbnUQOCd3PJB4qSP/6UpwJMwebbmx8Ar5Qz4gefCp/ZBw/Qw4TJYRbaUHE9 oqx7nIaFqkyyNl8W/hayz/WghVUHRQlWitl5AM4qrQ6EHqBg575a56Lu7+TlB88XHGEh JiyALxng3NizC53CMjDSlm5PKFl3/Vz6KPdjY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sI/P+6Sd1d9epQ1+0QbpRVbSRwuWtJ3ZwE0p4w2IQVCxfNwgxGP/WvolOxakn+RQ3c CteSKI2+vKqMbZNDsYBDmv3+tgkpf5ybbBbAnEhK3DFdB5YQnGz9ImLRmbleM3OpgDdO +AFdUxBcyIl+2sh9DiWtsMityPaZeTH/yvmsw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.177.21 with SMTP id z21mr1298027wfe.65.1278084272255; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.1 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:24:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yeah, a good way to think of it is that parallelism is achieved at the application level. On the input side, you can process multiple files in parallel or one file in parallel by logically splitting and opening multiple readers of the same file at multiple points. Each of these readers is single threaded, because, well, you're returning a stream of bytes in order. It's inherently serial. On the reduce side, multiple reduces run, writing to multiple files in the same directory. Again, you can't really write to a single file in parallel effectively -- you can't write byte 26 before byte 25, because the file's not that long yet. Theoretically, maybe you could have all reduces write to the same file by allocating some amount of space ahead of time and writing to the blocks in parallel - in practice, you very rarely know how big your output is going to be before it's produced, so this doesn't really work. Multiple files in the same directory achieves the same goal much more elegantly, without exposing a bunch of internal details of the filesystem to user space. Does that make sense? On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... > > I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help this = problem? > > I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some specific = client code which is being run on a client outside of the cloud/cluster.... > > I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on diffe= rent JVMs. ;-) > > Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes wit= hin the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per block. You can wri= te your own splitter to increase this and then get more parallelism. > > HTH > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > > Hi, > > Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect the > most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that > list. > > Hemanth > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky wrote= : >> I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. >> >> From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. >> Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a fi= le >> in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. >> When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. W= hen >> write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of the= m >> simultaneously. >> >> Is this right? >> > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. =A0If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is= strictly prohibited. =A0If you have received this communication in error, = please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any co= py of it from your computer or paper files. > From general-return-1739-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 17:11:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7926 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 17:11:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 17:11:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 28464 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 17:11:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28366 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 17:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28358 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 17:11:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:11:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:10:57 +0000 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so535709qyk.14 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rZg116dBf/qhu2o7mBgUxYZLd24GMBiP+M1dN4xFIbc=; b=qpmfYGpmKVQf+C/ltLetFmJCt1dcp6N6AycS3k0R3d15n9WHlN2m/WfwE6Jb/OtN16 ou89aPprB3hU9noOv5od4tKjS0mszxpQo23nkEeUyaNw/WMMid78q9CrnPJhJQ+kzCQ3 zzTD01+IveE6isgsH5BuHGFnrvvPIJFDKPt6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aqVU7FhAezYxnh3KxN9trLWHBaYn3mRcLLXOJwKq76w+M0UM2JOoJ7TsYK7fEwYf1U NnrfS5eMDDZkHwjvVXR/tLs8IHfPWv14y8o/MIE4CqYIJhJgdvDNXS55sXoW8juH9EE/ 1RG8EFBZQzbBueOUCgwGYLNgJANTXU/MkBQ0U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.28.78 with SMTP id l14mr611889qac.31.1278090636624; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.134 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <447928.62922.qm@web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:10:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Displaying Map output in MapReduce From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce08c630578048a6aaa02 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ce08c630578048a6aaa02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Minor correction - port is 50075: http://10.32.56.159:50075/logs/userlogs/ On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! Supposing that you=B4re using a virtualized environment, you should b= e > able to get to JobTracker Web Admin Interface from http:// > machine_ip>:50070/logs/userlogs. In case you=B4re running Hadoop from ins= ide > a > cluster frontend, use this machine=B4s IP. Inside this directory, it will > exist another one called "userlogs" where you will see all map and reduce > tasks launch by the JobTracker and the TaskTrackers. These tasks will loo= k > like 'job_[m,r]_0_xxxxxx' (or similar). Inside of every one of them there > will be three subdirectories (stdout, stdlog and stderr) which will conta= in > all your debugging messages. > Inside my MapReduce development programs I use the Java *LOG* class in a > sentence like this: > > private static final Log LOG =3D > LogFactory.getLog(.class.getName()); > LOG.info("***********INSIDE MY REDUCER SETUP**********"); > > Besides these messages, a normal "System.out.println(...)" will also appe= ar > in the above directories. > > Hope it helps! > > 2010/7/2 abc xyz > > > Hi folks, > > > > I want to just display the output of my mapper on console or want to lo= g > it > > in > > some file. System.out.println and Log4j's logger are not displaying the > > output. > > How can I see the intermediate results? > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Alberto > --0015175ce08c630578048a6aaa02-- From general-return-1740-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 02 18:37:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38310 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 18:37:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 18:37:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 34238 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 18:37:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34180 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 18:37:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34172 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 18:37:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:37:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdixon@omniti.com designates 8.8.38.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [8.8.38.6] (HELO edge.omniti.com) (8.8.38.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:37:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=omniti.com; s=s1024; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@omniti.com; t=1278095840; h=From:Subject:Date:To; bh=5mW/o0Yolk6i0ziVhBG6Cou4Hi1vnQwwKX1QuEi5AVE=; b=aaiGkLgsqruxK6dClKmdSHzdKylWol4tYTNzcXENUpe8uS6z/W4PqM6x4HsEz3Cl DCLhaEqlEaSHuy9C1I/7f6yQcrM4ivgZspUDhNlekakw21E1GMbHGaHzOtpjbl7B VEiqxt/fdd7M50D5FSKlRuW/fmjqjQyMu335qGxBjN4=; Authentication-Results: edge smtp.user=jdixon@omniti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [68.55.0.29] ([68.55.0.29:59137] helo=omniti.com) by edge (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.35 r(26636M)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id B5/78-17327-0E13E2C4; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:37:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:37:17 -0400 From: Jason Dixon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: CFP for Surge Scalability Conference 2010 Message-ID: <20100702183716.GE29381@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A quick reminder that there's one week left to submit your abstract for this year's Surge Scalability Conference. The event is taking place on Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Surge focuses on case studies that address production failures and the re-engineering efforts that led to victory in Web Applications or Internet Architectures. Our Keynote speakers include John Allspaw and Theo Schlossnagle. We are currently accepting submissions for the Call For Papers through July 9th. You can find more information, including suggested topics and our current list of speakers, online: http://omniti.com/surge/2010 I'd also like to urge folks who are planning to attend, to get your session passes sooner rather than later. We have limited seating and we are on track to sell out early. For more information, including the CFP, sponsorship of the event, or participating as an exhibitor, please visit the Surge website or contact us at surge@omniti.com. Thanks, -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdixon@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 From general-return-1741-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 03 16:34:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98297 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2010 16:34:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jul 2010 16:34:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62934 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 16:34:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62463 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2010 16:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62448 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2010 16:34:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.181] (HELO web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:34:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 3153 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jul 2010 16:33:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278174819; bh=TnnNYTHRRh+GC542QcHr2EnscnDQQ2bo5gvz7MAwZRM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vt/aDLMhvz7493/Gw9b8pagpSnC8AVrb9aC1kbJZ8YxZpXYLR2+tmvYkGXzCWbPLDHnCp/y+f+ocAv6eTFp6GRerKEbFjrDUTNHSJzizEc/vfU+JNPBP1irXIrzEA2J6Ais+vUyAOwUp6FsdSgRRuNULfuZ+py1Ii4z9qkDIIXU= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ke+U/vhxw7rbSM1qEFVSu8Xrnjt9WkGmFl8XCPfmt8ETM1HZdMs9StBIGfM112dlyeenaT1YEeBKFcSPRYS/7NTKybkPrC0GELvTjLX7T1Dju6eRo/PvT/gkGaFhzAhh7zo6qpSI8eA71kEAy4pkogxr6bDBtLJdgOvpby4nCwQ=; Message-ID: <482872.98634.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xgcX5LgVM1ntRgk9jSvfOWiUAeYf4yl7sNonJMfAPIdOjAj 8D4xYKm_1jAu1jWkwUDpDc7L_TF8vCIU6GYFR7K0zEe0J2X0oVoOQ7JuAjpo vPVk0dtVz248pEVDNr4h7EXqa0evoy9jad1vSlHj_Uk_8qtr420EUIfjEJpU rfHJjvX5HH9P7p8nJ24aC.pEEpnQFJmj9m0rOlIO40Y4x.5MiSZxjeRsNesK IPzuCKbcGrr4KiZzA6jGi_YQggf33NNwZM9mJiuHKnjXhWT.XM1MPR0NqOJs vFbPTziLWBKUP.e4M6hVl5gq90Zc.lo7XpxJi Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:33:39 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 09:33:39 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Partitioned Datasets Map/Reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1646732546-1278174819=:98634" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1646732546-1278174819=:98634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello everyone, I have written my custom partitioner for partitioning datasets. I want to partition two datasets using the same partitioner and then in the next mapreduce job, I want each mapper to handle the same partition from the two sources and perform some function such as joining etc. How I can I ensure that one mapper gets the split that corresponds to same partition from both the sources? Any help would be highly appreciated. --0-1646732546-1278174819=:98634-- From general-return-1742-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 05:48:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15724 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 05:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 05:48:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 99278 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 05:48:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98977 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 05:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98969 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 05:48:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:48:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brandonusa@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:48:20 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so108861pzk.35 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:47:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=uM0E/o0BpoqO6jafelTTLK2AAVDPfOjjgIqGQZJ9Vrk=; b=IlW6ucftcEmWvtvDyuBgakYUSaMCObp8CF2ILG8UUCyBWVO4DH9JyBog2RGrs5f1lp 2WAc9wOKQqyQj/VKBPAH+kg/cWaqdDcFfVHLzPIxvXt/nbUCtNYGlhQvgKwKf9g4VqYR xkxHorrzAkSTpdbnxuxu44Z/YCBORDFVXUdLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=NqWVIhG0jJs6+I8D6/piT4XvunB5Fm0Yx5khk9ARRejuV9nvug7D32CRnpp+bVmHNv y8C2/4wwjtAAkZsSJtHsv0bQ4SqrcOAFdCpWsCkKnoxF7HXUqTZKpHo91OBbVvzXc0Nm fKxhNv/wQc4sSP9pGVFSV9exX3x+TEB3vL0OE= Received: by 10.142.188.13 with SMTP id l13mr2465980wff.54.1278308829784; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (cpe-76-94-135-238.socal.res.rr.com [76.94.135.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm4153715wfd.15.2010.07.04.22.47.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:47:08 -0700 (PDT) References: Message-Id: <4A6F17FD-7E27-4535-8F8E-B106064F2EA0@gmail.com> From: Bardia Afshin To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 22:47:02 -0700 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What's the unsubcribe link? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > Yeah, a good way to think of it is that parallelism is achieved at the > application level. > > On the input side, you can process multiple files in parallel or one > file in parallel by logically splitting and opening multiple readers > of the same file at multiple points. Each of these readers is single > threaded, because, well, you're returning a stream of bytes in order. > It's inherently serial. > > On the reduce side, multiple reduces run, writing to multiple files in > the same directory. Again, you can't really write to a single file in > parallel effectively -- you can't write byte 26 before byte 25, > because the file's not that long yet. > > Theoretically, maybe you could have all reduces write to the same file > by allocating some amount of space ahead of time and writing to the > blocks in parallel - in practice, you very rarely know how big your > output is going to be before it's produced, so this doesn't really > work. Multiple files in the same directory achieves the same goal > much more elegantly, without exposing a bunch of internal details of > the filesystem to user space. > > Does that make sense? > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: >> Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... >> >> I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help >> this problem? >> >> I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some >> specific client code which is being run on a client outside of the >> cloud/cluster.... >> >> I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on >> different JVMs. ;-) >> >> Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different >> nodes within the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per >> block. You can write your own splitter to increase this and then >> get more parallelism. >> >> HTH >> >> -Mike >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? >> >> Hi, >> >> Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect >> the >> most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that >> list. >> >> Hemanth >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky >> wrote: >>> I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. >>> >>> From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and >>> write. >>> Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored >>> as a file >>> in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. >>> When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all >>> blocks. When >>> write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all >>> of them >>> simultaneously. >>> >>> Is this right? >>> >> >> >> The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL >> and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >> any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, >> or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please notify the sender and >> delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your >> computer or paper files. >> From general-return-1743-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 06:08:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21465 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 06:08:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 06:08:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 12854 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 06:08:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12490 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 06:08:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12482 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 06:08:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 06:08:30 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so3984236wyb.35 for ; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 23:08:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DSioEhsK8Ps9BhWr1w3YK6tKGGVIpjQCgnbSwrrTVNg=; b=raKyatGuwFTjXV7Bqllw7AmH1+eMs3t+ZGLPyhPw3Fsy6I6OGZSymxEIi1aXeHRiBx pRjCd312XfYDoQIaMXSiJpa1NPbaEVeoW7G11rjBACMvKEWn5K6xOhee+EgNEtOHPiBO 7Y3wI43HADPd6mjprPg9zaKiBGHXHvLqP+uHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MZCwcfQZNsbhm7reOS/3uAoLG3ZR0p+JoXoybh3n53mpSievexdRJiCz6rqXxPBafg lalST6cvVXOJQm5KUvtyXKZKDL7bLNz1PLFc3QwdZ8SBr8PjIGcXVkW+3s6UlMUWQ/pT ikpNpEdqqLc1WwIt3Vzbs5yr2UFOeIVzokdRM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.129.139 with SMTP id o11mr2871508wbs.144.1278310090684; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 23:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.173.209 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 23:08:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A6F17FD-7E27-4535-8F8E-B106064F2EA0@gmail.com> References: <4A6F17FD-7E27-4535-8F8E-B106064F2EA0@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:08:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 07:47, Bardia Afshin wrote: > What's the unsubcribe link? To unsubscribe, send mail to general-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org Many Apache MLs have an unsubscribe footer. Anyone volunteering to make this happen for this list, too? Bernd From general-return-1744-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 07:34:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43397 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 59415 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 07:34:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59106 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 07:34:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59098 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 07:34:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:34:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:34:44 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so8353576vws.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.58.74 with SMTP id f10mr1308515vch.86.1278315262222; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.17.134 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:34:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <447928.62922.qm@web46311.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:34:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Displaying Map output in MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235445b87e1da17d048a9ef72c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00235445b87e1da17d048a9ef72c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you set the number of reduce tasks to zero, the outputs of the mappers will be sent directly to the OutputFormat. You can debug your map phase of = a job by disabling reduce and inspecting the mapper outputs, and then re-enable the reducer after you've got the mapping part of the job running correctly. -- Aaron On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Minor correction - port is 50075: > http://10.32.56.159:50075/logs/userlogs/ > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi! Supposing that you=B4re using a virtualized environment, you should= be > > able to get to JobTracker Web Admin Interface from http:// > > > machine_ip>:50070/logs/userlogs. In case you=B4re running Hadoop from > inside > > a > > cluster frontend, use this machine=B4s IP. Inside this directory, it wi= ll > > exist another one called "userlogs" where you will see all map and redu= ce > > tasks launch by the JobTracker and the TaskTrackers. These tasks will > look > > like 'job_[m,r]_0_xxxxxx' (or similar). Inside of every one of them the= re > > will be three subdirectories (stdout, stdlog and stderr) which will > contain > > all your debugging messages. > > Inside my MapReduce development programs I use the Java *LOG* class in = a > > sentence like this: > > > > private static final Log LOG =3D > > LogFactory.getLog(.class.getName()); > > LOG.info("***********INSIDE MY REDUCER SETUP**********"); > > > > Besides these messages, a normal "System.out.println(...)" will also > appear > > in the above directories. > > > > Hope it helps! > > > > 2010/7/2 abc xyz > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I want to just display the output of my mapper on console or want to > log > > it > > > in > > > some file. System.out.println and Log4j's logger are not displaying t= he > > > output. > > > How can I see the intermediate results? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > --00235445b87e1da17d048a9ef72c-- From general-return-1745-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 07:39:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44652 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 07:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 07:39:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 71842 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 07:39:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71636 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 07:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71626 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 07:39:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:39:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 07:39:45 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so8357588vws.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.58.74 with SMTP id f10mr1311811vch.86.1278315501099; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:38:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.17.134 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:38:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C29C36D.2030806@apache.org> References: <4C29C36D.2030806@apache.org> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:38:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we modify files in HDFS? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235445b87e5a9b89048a9f0519 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00235445b87e5a9b89048a9f0519 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > elton sky wrote: > >> thanx Jeff, >> >> So...it is a significant drawback. >> As a matter of fact, there are many cases we need to modify. >> > > > When people say "Hadoop filesystems are not posix", this is what they mean. > No locks, no read/write. seeking discouraged. Even append is something that > is just stabilising. to be fair though, even NFS is quirky and that's been > around since Ether-net was considered so cutting edge it had a hyphen in the > title. > > HDFS delivers availability through redundant copies across multiple > machines: you can read your data on or near any machine with a copy of the > data. Think what you'd need for full seek and read/write actions > > > * seek would kill bulk IO perf on classic rotating-disk HDDs, and nobody > can afford to build a petabyte filestore out of SSDs yet. You should be > streaming, not seeking. > > * to do writes, you'd need to lock out access to the files, which implies a > distributed lock infrastructure (zookeeper?) or deal with conflicting > writes. > > * if you want immediate update writes you'd need to push out the changes to > the (existing) nodes, and deal with queueing up pending changes to machines > that are currently offline in a way that I don't want to think about. > > * if you want slower-update writes (eventual consistency), then things may > be slightly simpler -you'd need a lock on writing and each write would > eventually be pushed out to the readers with a bit better bandwidth and CPU > scheduling flexibility , but there's still that offline node problem. If a > node that was down comes up, how does it know it's data is out of date and > where does it get the data from? What will it do if all other nodes that > have updated data are offline. > > > > > I dont understand why Yahoo didn't provoid that functionality. And as I > know > > no one else is working on this. Why is that? > > It's because it scares us and we are happier writing code to live in a > world where you don't seek and patch files, but instead add new data and > delete old stuff. I don't know what the Cassandra and HBase teams do here. > It's my understanding that HBase stores datasets in reasonably small files (a few hundred MB each?) where deltas to a section are in more files that are actually stacked on top of older ones. Every so often a garbage collection routine compacts a stack of files for a slice of the table down into a single file for that slice. And yes, Yahoo (nor anybody else, for that matter) has not provided this functionality because it's a lot trickier to add true overwrite capability in a distributed environment than one might think at first glance. The engineering cost of developing modification support has, for all parties interested thus far, been higher than the cost of working around this limitation. :) > -steve > > > > > --00235445b87e5a9b89048a9f0519-- From general-return-1746-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 08:13:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56485 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 08:13:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 08:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20149 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:13:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18659 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18651 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 08:13:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:13:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=CTYPE_001C_B,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.50] (HELO sara-exch-fe2.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:13:26 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe2.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.694.0; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:12:44 +0200 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:12:44 +0200 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:12:43 +0200 Subject: Hadoop versions & distributions Thread-Topic: Hadoop versions & distributions Thread-Index: AcscGdXRU3173thcQcCGXH49/En1Yg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB1C2A.9A605600" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB1C2A.9A605600 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_01CB1C2A.9A605600" ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CB1C2A.9A605600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There are a number of different versions and distributions of Hadoop which, as far as I understand, all differ from each other. I know that in the 0.20-append branch, files in HDFS can be appended, and that the Y! distribution (0.20.S) implements security features through Kerberos. And then there are the 0.20.3 and 0.22.0 branches. And trunk of course, which I guess is 0.20.2 nowadays? In addition to that there are distributions by Cloudera(CDH2 / 3beta) and IBM (IDAH). >From my perspective, setting up a pilot cluster for a small number of users from different institutes, security (0.20.S) is very attractive - scientists like the idea of shielding their data and logic from other users. But what will I miss if I choose Y!'s distribution over all of these other options? Regards, Evert Lammerts ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CB1C2A.9A605600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There are a number of different versions and = distributions of Hadoop which, as far as I understand, all differ from each other. I know = that in the 0.20-append branch, files in HDFS can be appended, and that the = Y! distribution (0.20.S) implements security features through Kerberos. And then there = are the 0.20.3 and 0.22.0 branches. And trunk of course, which I guess is 0.20.2 = nowadays? In addition to that there are distributions by Cloudera(CDH2 / 3beta) and = IBM (IDAH).

 

From my perspective, setting up a pilot cluster for = a small number of users from different institutes, security (0.20.S) is very = attractive – scientists like the idea of shielding their data and logic from = other users. But what will I miss if I choose Y!’s distribution over all = of these other options?

 

Regards,

 

Evert Lammerts

------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CB1C2A.9A605600-- ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB1C2A.9A605600 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDcwNTA4MTI0MVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFP54v6RG fT6L5qDh49dCUmQJS01UMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAa4jDHbSsjjJ/eKiYH6OVmsDDgcEmZy/3wOqotzW74nEsBCM+lcw+01KIyNg5opVZ28ppx/7T +jJZ3gfg8U1sDPa8lc4MCku0NxGWdCYb1qoVy2j2p69fbgdKZYpJID6GWlkNqLKcsO1MAcIWcZUh pAptmpUZyk6Jr5qYbYakrL7edj72m9GZOWZW5g5PpUX3f1al+D7c3oRQxM7Bfv0TKGnZPQrb8+ZA +LRNk+p4te2v7wmqCDgemzEJrsMUTi1jLWgXsOY1SEoYfeyP947VBIj6gRgMxcQrSoEniDWandLD KgBg16aze9jVsePQ+fjZiAj2Wa6YRABG6Zp7822BoAAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB1C2A.9A605600-- From general-return-1747-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 08:31:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59489 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 08:31:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 08:31:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 35409 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35069 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35061 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 08:31:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zhangguoping96@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:31:00 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so8415223vws.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:29:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jhzhrBGrvWeqbW4C2rpb8jWyVQgnvGuhZIiW+rOgwPw=; b=ewghYEhV+8zKtuz/gqVA1VZB6XTkek1UMa2Hi8okIWGzafO//xE6PgeJsVThMU7Bih VyzoZP+IqJ7BWc9RI2YdYDbCwjHZnCeNburFR87WVXdzjoskxJVh8016CtgTEXeQMBtf G0E0lkX5Aj4oM1pcWQK4qHrjKJX7+Dl2BQtKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=R9iPk0EbFzhvHOZyBdUx0MdiviRxNftFX5ikYj10H5h5/c0NhlTD824zuVAjg9u9MM gYO5jD4feEbxZfInF4sTKLJ2mk+mM53ZMBDeB8MMps9TjditjubvcqmS6AdYOqiaFgrS zzoWfs04hgUmdWIT/MJHy5qrmmdrOZuXPcEeo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.183.84 with SMTP id cf20mr1294924qcb.93.1278318579392; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.4.213 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 01:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:29:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Is org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat deprecated? From: zhangguoping zhangguoping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630ff65d5a337048a9fbc3f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163630ff65d5a337048a9fbc3f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Is org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat deprecated? I did not find @deprecated comments in source file in 0.20.2 But I cannot use following: job.setOutputFormatClass( org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat ) The type does not match. --00163630ff65d5a337048a9fbc3f-- From general-return-1748-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 12:10:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24213 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 12:10:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 12:10:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 98776 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 12:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98240 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 12:10:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98231 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 12:10:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:10:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:09:57 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so2661102qwd.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:08:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YhHZwWn4dpL7kXvdV4QyS87LIuTAQCcgpBQdCBpr7P4=; b=DCedBqSstu7ri3PM1m3ZSA+mugOIv6J+tocf4nITn1njqUY/ZmUQ8KSwDsNgvs4Avy fLoFl4aYm9LM/eP/GXCOXOgsQjdMKYKC3QUygasnBNJmFXq11VfUvVByxeYudOQXEJwO wKM8mWwruFR5fDsmSVB9b78SWtx94ngZEQpnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MwK8SoTTomJz8ZlLjSqzohpYOoxKLE64jhzFFIMWcBy3zU16PdH2fBrV2JpFtSZtqr hDkm21WBVzZkCxRT8OgJWV3fbtkN6kqL57nl9aBjm062alPepYJqPFnjXgLdJjdritXr nCst/jL/urALOdkPqOxHIaW1ig/5sKiBeXYjI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.59.195 with SMTP id m3mr1006558qah.34.1278331727110; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 05:08:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:08:47 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09fa21ac37fe6c7048aa2cc54 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09fa21ac37fe6c7048aa2cc54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Segel, Jay Thanks for reply! >Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes within the cloud. By >default you get one map/reduce job per block. You can write your own splitter to increase >this and then get more parallelism. sounds like an elegant solution. We can modify the 'distcp', using a simple MR job, make it based on block rather than file. >in practice, you very rarely know how big your output is going to be before it's produced, so >this doesn't really work I think you got the point why Yahoo make this design descision. Multithreading only applicable when you know the size of the file, like copy existing files, so you can split them and feed to different threads. On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > Yeah, a good way to think of it is that parallelism is achieved at the > application level. > > On the input side, you can process multiple files in parallel or one > file in parallel by logically splitting and opening multiple readers > of the same file at multiple points. Each of these readers is single > threaded, because, well, you're returning a stream of bytes in order. > It's inherently serial. > > On the reduce side, multiple reduces run, writing to multiple files in > the same directory. Again, you can't really write to a single file in > parallel effectively -- you can't write byte 26 before byte 25, > because the file's not that long yet. > > Theoretically, maybe you could have all reduces write to the same file > by allocating some amount of space ahead of time and writing to the > blocks in parallel - in practice, you very rarely know how big your > output is going to be before it's produced, so this doesn't really > work. Multiple files in the same directory achieves the same goal > much more elegantly, without exposing a bunch of internal details of > the filesystem to user space. > > Does that make sense? > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... > > > > I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help this > problem? > > > > I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some specific > client code which is being run on a client outside of the cloud/cluster.... > > > > I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on > different JVMs. ;-) > > > > Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes > within the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per block. You can > write your own splitter to increase this and then get more parallelism. > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect the > > most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that > > list. > > > > Hemanth > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky > wrote: > >> I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. > >> > >> From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. > >> Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a > file > >> in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. > >> When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. > When > >> write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of > them > >> simultaneously. > >> > >> Is this right? > >> > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > --00c09fa21ac37fe6c7048aa2cc54-- From general-return-1749-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 17:02:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95242 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 17:02:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 17:02:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 56301 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 17:02:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56243 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 17:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56235 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 17:02:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:02:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:02:38 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so3877663iwn.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.148.131 with SMTP id p3mr3806624ibv.18.1278349336286; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:02:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.72 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:01:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:01:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e7e92a169a0c048aa6e67d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485e7e92a169a0c048aa6e67d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:08 AM, elton sky wrote: > Segel, Jay > Thanks for reply! > > >Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes > within the cloud. By >default you get one map/reduce job per block. You can > write your own splitter to increase >this and then get more parallelism. > sounds like an elegant solution. We can modify the 'distcp', using a simple > MR job, make it based on block rather than file. > There's actually an open ticket somewhere to make distcp do this using the new concat() API in the NameNode. concat() allows several files to be combined into one file at the metadata level, so long as a number of restrictions are met. The work hasn't been done yet, but the concat() call is there and waiting for a user. -Todd > > >in practice, you very rarely know how big your output is going to be > before > it's produced, so >this doesn't really work > I think you got the point why Yahoo make this design descision. > Multithreading only applicable when you know the size of the file, like > copy > existing files, so you can split them and feed to different threads. > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > > > Yeah, a good way to think of it is that parallelism is achieved at the > > application level. > > > > On the input side, you can process multiple files in parallel or one > > file in parallel by logically splitting and opening multiple readers > > of the same file at multiple points. Each of these readers is single > > threaded, because, well, you're returning a stream of bytes in order. > > It's inherently serial. > > > > On the reduce side, multiple reduces run, writing to multiple files in > > the same directory. Again, you can't really write to a single file in > > parallel effectively -- you can't write byte 26 before byte 25, > > because the file's not that long yet. > > > > Theoretically, maybe you could have all reduces write to the same file > > by allocating some amount of space ahead of time and writing to the > > blocks in parallel - in practice, you very rarely know how big your > > output is going to be before it's produced, so this doesn't really > > work. Multiple files in the same directory achieves the same goal > > much more elegantly, without exposing a bunch of internal details of > > the filesystem to user space. > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... > > > > > > I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help > this > > problem? > > > > > > I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some > specific > > client code which is being run on a client outside of the > cloud/cluster.... > > > > > > I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on > > different JVMs. ;-) > > > > > > Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes > > within the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per block. You > can > > write your own splitter to increase this and then get more parallelism. > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect the > > > most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that > > > list. > > > > > > Hemanth > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky > > wrote: > > >> I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. > > >> > > >> From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. > > >> Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a > > file > > >> in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. > > >> When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all blocks. > > When > > >> write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of > > them > > >> simultaneously. > > >> > > >> Is this right? > > >> > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and > > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are > > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, > > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, > is > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485e7e92a169a0c048aa6e67d-- From general-return-1750-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 05 21:22:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65360 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 21:22:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 21:22:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24264 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 21:22:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24173 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 21:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24165 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 21:22:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:22:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:22:14 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so4167033iwn.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.4 with SMTP id n4mr3966296ibk.16.1278364852316; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.72 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:20:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:20:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop versions & distributions To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ba554ea6a13048aaa822d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64ba554ea6a13048aaa822d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Evert Lammerts wrot= e: > There are a number of different versions and distributions of Hadoop > which, as far as I understand, all differ from each other. I know that in > the 0.20-append branch, files in HDFS can be appended, and that the Y! > distribution (0.20.S) implements security features through Kerberos. And > then there are the 0.20.3 and 0.22.0 branches. And trunk of course, which= I > guess is 0.20.2 nowadays? In addition to that there are distributions by > Cloudera(CDH2 / 3beta) and IBM (IDAH). > > > > From my perspective, setting up a pilot cluster for a small number of use= rs > from different institutes, security (0.20.S) is very attractive =96 scien= tists > like the idea of shielding their data and logic from other users. But wha= t > will I miss if I choose Y!=92s distribution over all of these other optio= ns? > > Hi Evert, Y!'s distribution does contain a good set of patches, and we at Cloudera ar= e always keeping track of the ydist git repository to incorporate those changes into CDH. Currently, ydist contains the security patch series, but doesn't include the recent append work. CDH3b2 includes the append work, bu= t not security as of yet -- we are currently integrating security and it should be available in the next beta. Aside from the specific patches included, it's worth noting that the Y! dis= t is a git repository, rather than a full binary-and-source distribution of Hadoop and related tools. CDH includes not just the core hadoop components but also integrates many other important ecosystem components including Pig= , Hive, Oozie, HBase, Zookeeper, Flume, etc. Thanks -Todd --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e64ba554ea6a13048aaa822d-- From general-return-1751-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 00:02:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91096 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 00:02:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 00:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 96971 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 00:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96897 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 00:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96889 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 00:02:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:02:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:01:54 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so2225544qyk.14 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:01:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=doxNBTENzw9XIiLIExL4kSNl6NOwqZKzN7JxZgyhFdw=; b=XltMEfhcqFwnQHPv6lWFb3OVREazlFRoOwumc+PedtTwO6JAlZKgjjas9RJlVk50VS 5k1V3d6W3ebckA4v0yJjBg+3FD6DohM52lO7t715jHIaYixAxywAx6dgBcWk1xRyKym0 7rv91qRTkvdTbaSR59othnhUN7s2+DGD7vrmE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LA9FrY/x0dD4FCc1GwB2jXYdC3mJFkgPpbrEdVOokHirB//Tpt+3dRPS1k4dBqq2CZ 9SZ0r1XJjy4zRblnDPocX7OLFsNwV82paWdupRJ7dNRySvJcOuQEGlM4a7BV4cuJ3IUv 4iz6Ds9b2+/8Md4LbhoINVj66f+hQOg3JUtl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.75.149 with SMTP id y21mr1519575qaj.36.1278374491633; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:01:31 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e988e876b81e048aacc19b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485e988e876b81e048aacc19b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >There's actually an open ticket somewhere to make distcp do this using the >new concat() API in the NameNode. Where can I find that "open ticket"? >concat() allows several files to be combined into one file at the metadata level, so long as a number of >restrictions are met. The work hasn't been done yet, but the concat() call is there and waiting for a user. Well, this sounds good when you have many small files, you concat() them into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and copy all a few blocks in parallel. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:08 AM, elton sky wrote: > > > Segel, Jay > > Thanks for reply! > > > > >Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes > > within the cloud. By >default you get one map/reduce job per block. You > can > > write your own splitter to increase >this and then get more parallelism. > > sounds like an elegant solution. We can modify the 'distcp', using a > simple > > MR job, make it based on block rather than file. > > > > There's actually an open ticket somewhere to make distcp do this using the > new concat() API in the NameNode. concat() allows several files to be > combined into one file at the metadata level, so long as a number of > restrictions are met. The work hasn't been done yet, but the concat() call > is there and waiting for a user. > > -Todd > > > > > > >in practice, you very rarely know how big your output is going to be > > before > > it's produced, so >this doesn't really work > > I think you got the point why Yahoo make this design descision. > > Multithreading only applicable when you know the size of the file, like > > copy > > existing files, so you can split them and feed to different threads. > > > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > > > > > Yeah, a good way to think of it is that parallelism is achieved at the > > > application level. > > > > > > On the input side, you can process multiple files in parallel or one > > > file in parallel by logically splitting and opening multiple readers > > > of the same file at multiple points. Each of these readers is single > > > threaded, because, well, you're returning a stream of bytes in order. > > > It's inherently serial. > > > > > > On the reduce side, multiple reduces run, writing to multiple files in > > > the same directory. Again, you can't really write to a single file in > > > parallel effectively -- you can't write byte 26 before byte 25, > > > because the file's not that long yet. > > > > > > Theoretically, maybe you could have all reduces write to the same file > > > by allocating some amount of space ahead of time and writing to the > > > blocks in parallel - in practice, you very rarely know how big your > > > output is going to be before it's produced, so this doesn't really > > > work. Multiple files in the same directory achieves the same goal > > > much more elegantly, without exposing a bunch of internal details of > > > the filesystem to user space. > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > > > Actually they also listen here and this is a basic question... > > > > > > > > I'm not an expert, but how does having multiple threads really help > > this > > > problem? > > > > > > > > I'm assuming you're talking about a map/reduce job and not some > > specific > > > client code which is being run on a client outside of the > > cloud/cluster.... > > > > > > > > I wasn't aware that you could easily synchronize threads running on > > > different JVMs. ;-) > > > > > > > > Your parallelism comes from multiple tasks running on different nodes > > > within the cloud. By default you get one map/reduce job per block. You > > can > > > write your own splitter to increase this and then get more parallelism. > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 2:56 AM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Can you please post this on hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org ? I suspect > the > > > > most qualified people to answer this question would all be on that > > > > list. > > > > > > > > Hemanth > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, elton sky > > > wrote: > > > >> I guess this question was igored, so I just post it again. > > > >> > > > >> From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and > write. > > > >> Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as > a > > > file > > > >> in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism on block base. > > > >> When read across multi-blocks, threads can be used to read all > blocks. > > > When > > > >> write, we can calculate the offset of each block and write to all of > > > them > > > >> simultaneously. > > > >> > > > >> Is this right? > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL > and > > > is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you > are > > > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, > > > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, > > is > > > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > > > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and > any > > > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --001485e988e876b81e048aacc19b-- From general-return-1752-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 00:49:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5382 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 00:49:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 00:49:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 12492 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 00:49:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12416 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 00:49:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12408 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 00:49:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:49:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:49:09 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=AuQgPFPH9Gg1vT1I7qvAhy9LNetKSSKWtP/ERIpQ6nlL2GW2YQGYHHXz LlN/jL+KGYFoyoLwCXH/3jAoBjFTUTi1CWKUf7ZW9LiMiUy8W1c38pMLi fi1+2j4P1WoAaGv; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1278377348; x=1309913348; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Why=20single=20thread=20for=20HDFS? |Date:=20Tue,=206=20Jul=202010=2000:47:46=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20 |In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20 =0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20; bh=knG8dbJh3kHNif0GAgf8Ny1Aq0Ofr2MURF0r4QuIXOQ=; b=UINv3QCQaXvDHSgk6mdDT6FDgII9P5B+DbWk7sXQQqid4XIo8mE04m+T Cub2DUnfUxuoXJvwcmwQeyYDUTVTe3f9Keydjc5biaoY5YM+2aO/CsePM cnUD9i5oDtBUVlj; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,543,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="13434079" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:47:47 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? Thread-Topic: Why single thread for HDFS? Thread-Index: AQHLGa3sMMIbVYChWkWbc/hs3B8qDZKdufgAgABcVoCAACEFAIAEgE6AgABR5wCAAHU7gIAADOwA Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:47:46 +0000 Message-ID: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, elton sky wrote: > Well, this sounds good when you have many small files, you concat() them > into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and copy = all > a few blocks in parallel. Basically, your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and could b= e made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded design, it would make cp = operations faster. =20 This sounds like a particularly high cost for an operation that is rarely u= tilized. [This is much more interesting in a distcp context, but even then= not that great. distcp in my experience is usually used to push a bunch o= f files, so you get your parallelism at the file level. Typically these ar= e part files are usually the same approx. size.] From general-return-1753-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 03:47:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44168 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 03:47:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 03:47:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 83004 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 03:47:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82680 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 03:47:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82672 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 03:47:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:47:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:46:55 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so2306081qyk.14 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sH+JTXZZDaO7KuFJN4Fh72xYavW6uaud0luUXs4kOqc=; b=vZrLrfJ+5I/EpUNE5ndmMJKuqUgmqFaWiYxD0cEtSiTbEKXn2QEfV7rGI+8+VAaNaw uylcqhBv1wQpkhb9vR+8UAMjWgwX8BGykl56jv+WZzB7wUeyTO+zHw1L2VpcMqF1y98r I1ZWHaW7OWXozlwDnlzc98XITrZTWvqAtJiZ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=F5Ztd+90PnS7TxbZyMGrQ6DQn+oDLmSKFZqfsOSe3boLcnOZjGwJ01gZwrEpo4qgxF r46xj47p/lVR6UoYzxQfsKGKxHnQbaBm8LgyzgG0HvEOD22/VD3JvenAGn3zjUOFV0ru Mt3gYpF+rIY1abvRKCbVb8Xg86kmni12+6q/M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.2.211 with SMTP id 19mr2008832qak.103.1278387994376; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> References: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:46:34 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb83c4a3b6b048aafe623 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cb83c4a3b6b048aafe623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Basically, your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and could be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded >design, itwould make cp operations faster. What I mean is, if we have the size of a file we can parallel by calculating blocks. Otherwise we couldn't. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, elton sky wrote: > > Well, this sounds good when you have many small files, you concat() them > > into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and copy > all > > a few blocks in parallel. > > Basically, your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and could > be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded design, it would make cp > operations faster. > > This sounds like a particularly high cost for an operation that is rarely > utilized. [This is much more interesting in a distcp context, but even then > not that great. distcp in my experience is usually used to push a bunch of > files, so you get your parallelism at the file level. Typically these are > part files are usually the same approx. size.] > > > --0015175cb83c4a3b6b048aafe623-- From general-return-1754-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 04:41:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53808 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 04:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 04:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 4158 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 04:41:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3668 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 04:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3660 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 04:41:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 04:41:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 04:41:13 +0000 Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so623100pwj.35 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7TxFa00BIZxyfpAeC1K2sP4jSWJ3GeTkfufiiSOkBkg=; b=rxlwJ2MqUKmAifc2iQgezz+uywqwkh3dCfjM403DtCLBOPu9H/HiYSPDtR90G2dEVX iO1xq920VOLgOT+zkO7Fk7lLgr8iqbkRCWsZyOHCW/TWNpnUChpNRcx+MjlJ2RBMl0wS SqtmbCrYmr8a1B2LcQaKlbAMYd4pBEv5/r7bY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CWigFMd7DteoD706FGcn1LkLYtcYn2rPkFFu3pt2NE2c93ss/fskWylcL8wc6esvbm jAhZI0ovnR9GDgtZsU90+YYI6D+Lo9okEQ261jqCIUCIF6uIIhLmacE5qZbZEVWgdSpe 44boSO0+TPjaB9yPLgiCG2KkOZdZfuc7ZEtaM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.215.19 with SMTP id n19mr4576992wfg.258.1278391249325; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <482872.98634.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <482872.98634.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:10:49 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Partitioned Datasets Map/Reduce From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I have written my custom partitioner for partitioning datasets. I want = =A0to > partition two datasets using the same partitioner and then in the =A0next > mapreduce job, I want each mapper to handle the same partition from =A0th= e two > sources and perform some function such as joining etc. How I =A0can I ens= ure that > one mapper gets the split that corresponds to same =A0partition from both= the > sources? > Not really an answer to your specific question, but have you taken a look at Pig (http://hadoop.apache.org/pig) which is suitable for operations like Joining data sets ? From general-return-1755-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 07:31:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98384 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 07:31:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 07:31:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 41569 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 07:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41181 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 07:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41173 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 07:31:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:31:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:31:27 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so10155212vws.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:30:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HTKyjgjVVnwBhmlnOPncktaELR+3zhA2/9l5JOL6caE=; b=F8G0N30dSvp6zH1Y3FdclMzxaFEba3mzrigsDU+6c6BmOFxrzj4aomhwnK9t+s+00z 2fDlOAJsK1YvezrZefwcogslVYXzAAYsnaT/xNGSQ4xeDS8AHSwhl8stco1A2chjgQa0 O466ghCP21aLWWeuu7+At+XjSCKdbigINjyQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=A3paq3SOj2Em2EYgwe6k7DtuHZwjyVzV6bgYxLM2+Z++UfAztqekxMPx54FXQn6Gv8 PTscKFGSEis/+3H00HIincXzQ0hqljp+4ytKoXEba4bQyITCfCsKaNeRHHwXhn9LCvP5 x0BxXljIbJg/bj/oEbxqG/lRbIBpzw+1A2z2o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.223.140 with SMTP id ik12mr2297681qcb.50.1278401406196; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:30:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.249.136 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:30:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:30:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To add to Jay Booth's points, adding multi-threaded capability to HDFS will bring down the performance. Consider a production server where 4-5 jobs are running on a low-end commodity server. Currently, that is 4 threads reading and writing from the hard disk. Making it a multi-threaded read and write will create many threads (Number of Jobs * Default HDFS Block size * 1024 KB/ file system block sizes). For a low-end hard disk with limited RPM cycles, a higher number of threads will decrease the performance. As the number of disk access increase from 1, the throughput will increase. But after 3-4 parallel disk accesses, the performance will start to decrease. You can use performance analytics tools (like IOMeter) to identify the *ideal* number of parallel disk accesses for a specified hard-disk. --- Gautam On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:46 PM, elton sky wrote: >>Basically, your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and could > be made faster. =A0If HDFS had a more multi-threaded >design, itwould mak= e cp > operations faster. > What I mean is, if we have the size of a file we can parallel by calculat= ing > blocks. Otherwise we couldn't. > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: > >> >> On Jul 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, elton sky wrote: >> > Well, this sounds good when you have many small files, you concat() th= em >> > into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and co= py >> all >> > a few blocks in parallel. >> >> Basically, your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and coul= d >> be made faster. =A0If HDFS had a more multi-threaded design, it would ma= ke cp >> operations faster. >> >> This sounds like a particularly high cost for an operation that is rarel= y >> utilized. =A0[This is much more interesting in a distcp context, but eve= n then >> not that great. =A0distcp in my experience is usually used to push a bun= ch of >> files, so you get your parallelism at the file level. =A0Typically these= are >> part files are usually the same approx. size.] >> >> >> > From general-return-1756-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 08:50:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16122 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 08:50:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 08:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2339 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 08:50:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1996 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 08:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1983 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 08:50:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:50:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.181] (HELO web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:50:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 63183 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jul 2010 08:50:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278406214; bh=Vvz+ai4YJU0ZSe+dTL5QTx4XwGCU5YWCXcU1TGJbHPI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hzl1WcHEYUFBG7ph2MIcZwnjRUWB0goVY9iw+VUbGm+fjPtx416pW4MOqSlTkQZHekZv15lrDRc79my7wHDdCgA454jyWoof5yP8oBWDVFhQrLqQRdJyddJFDfOVohmpst9xvpHDZraD24VA7+xQLR/zvHQGRxDBfENIMCzqK38= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kvBO+I0CuyxzpWgxiqAOfTf2nM1HdDJh/rMwKzojvdxd8UtN+Ztfafa1kfeHvu62S+1eSGWZF5JdlTAXE6LJt4FG6IYdQh16hzMARZ6cot67l8NG3N5E2DAfYQB30i/AH8Z9iYrA2VQMVwI85GHs6XVc5SpVNv7EDJiGRcj0z80=; Message-ID: <614591.61443.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: a1bvpV4VM1lgtJkM0KlUBSddAhQOoEM5e.5gP0X_vQdpSyt bDIuxfLefqZFJIEcqhrYeq8_nCqHHeHaDVwICTi8gVo6C1reAuEA2WupNJlB hG6YVrEz9nebMTzs7E5ELm9AoPRnEARfrmGb_piGExJUB7Sm5.sBdWetn0u9 c6HDqq5.efHfFJBCwGDdJ9IQTAi1_BfQdlD9y1Ub.d711UXKCUREbezjj4Q0 3bLzxOLbUkauMMM8.gwXCvad38yyXt6SpiLD0nmXzZYLoEW5pyOtrCzBfzRj tMrM0AHfuWJD37pfWmLM219qdNegrM_Z3aQGhPf_izjaCDjZ8U7KxEFY1E96 yLDG7G6.DEAc- Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:50:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 References: <482872.98634.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 01:50:14 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Re: Partitioned Datasets Map/Reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-648482194-1278406214=:61443" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-648482194-1278406214=:61443 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii well, I want to do some experimentation with hadoop. I need to partition two datasets using same partitioning function and then in the next job, take the same partition from both datasets and apply some operation in the mapper. But how to ensure to get the same partition from both sources in one mapper?? ________________________________ From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tue, July 6, 2010 5:40:49 AM Subject: Re: Partitioned Datasets Map/Reduce Hi, > I have written my custom partitioner for partitioning datasets. I want to > partition two datasets using the same partitioner and then in the next > mapreduce job, I want each mapper to handle the same partition from the two > sources and perform some function such as joining etc. How I can I ensure that > one mapper gets the split that corresponds to same partition from both the > sources? > Not really an answer to your specific question, but have you taken a look at Pig (http://hadoop.apache.org/pig) which is suitable for operations like Joining data sets ? --0-648482194-1278406214=:61443-- From general-return-1757-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 08:54:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16600 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 08:54:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 08:54:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 6319 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 08:54:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6057 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 08:54:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6048 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 08:54:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:54:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zhangguoping96@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:54:07 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so545359pzk.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bd5gmHrJQrrxmLTLmPkyj16YgMW4xl9/v5Gq5PFilkA=; b=yBQkYJh05we6Tbk4+lmKrmi0eKq/gmVSlwBGj7nkjQyyVR0KSUGGs6sgLlGFhKOiTy ofIYUWtnPrKjSzC9Oq6CcQKhFVdcbuH/frYcJm0p6xxmywquXTChbDNKAWembaj763xB t0CZrUJ1tFjk1ogABobykhsVdDuuk0K4MvG/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j9hA3sJm6IT/bQsW8yY9lZfstOtaWVIcJPJn1PpZ9SFCmyAAopXZSFbhuZ5JO8qkJK VIkOI2IHyMdRWdguLiVcu1U2/kA0cLzgR8aLfx1W0GVqrJXMgyVXRb7UUawRkLM3rVVl dUosPF+I1wIvomYkUinP+Qw5uEEg8lQJYLi/Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.131.13 with SMTP id e13mr4631831wad.201.1278406425826; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 01:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.4.213 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 01:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:53:45 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Distributed Cache From: zhangguoping zhangguoping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636417fb5e3d66d048ab43039 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636417fb5e3d66d048ab43039 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From the book: "Hadoop The definitive guide" -- P242 >> When you launch a job, Hadoop copies the files specified by the -files and -archives options to the jobtracker=92s filesystem (normally HDFS). Then, before a task is run, the tasktracker copies the files from the jobtracker=92s filesystem= to a local disk=97 the cache=97so the task can access the files. >> I wonder why hadoop wants to copy the files to jobtracker's filesystem. Since it is already in HDFS, it should be available to tasks. Any considerations? --001636417fb5e3d66d048ab43039-- From general-return-1758-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 09:13:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23479 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 09:13:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 30471 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30227 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30219 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:13:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:12:55 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so643264pvc.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:12:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VpwNb6eyEP2O+GXnbaQjVPTS+zxn38gU1vYWDODBb9Y=; b=Pw3oGWrprgg/Xv5DJ9XUVQEO87E6mI5ZbkyoQs4Mj46O1eoKv2DKhxXY/FGG9yCTFM Y5aaLF114zi6Kyk+kDCb0FASV6lGSxv04AWBqhzlPZVRV2/8HvxSfDbJZTq2Xwj6r7oq vt26ePFkCki6NCsciabnWLL0wqL99jUubLGGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w/sjpHVmuSZCFxoFHlnh3i3ri1pxxbgDYUdERMIRpo/0HZvhKQcI+X+6ZL4mwp3Mnb 1ZekBvOQlGes2GrKI3UFGed6mV+fC7MTWHJa3v23FtpBEF+RHgzB9zdpA5WkMrvCou7J 90WO6rZ+Y/0wOEWaJ59UOiXb57aPa6B3w16No= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.232.13 with SMTP id e13mr4905500wfh.196.1278407553735; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:12:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:42:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Distributed Cache From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > From the book: "Hadoop The definitive guide" -- P242 >>> > When you launch a job, Hadoop copies the files specified by the -files an= d > -archives options to the jobtracker=92s filesystem (normally HDFS). Then, > before a task > is run, the tasktracker copies the files from the jobtracker=92s filesyst= em to > a local disk=97 > the cache=97so the task can access the files. >>> > > I wonder why hadoop wants to copy the files to jobtracker's filesystem. > Since it is already in HDFS, it should be available to tasks. > Any considerations? Unlike input data files for M/R tasks, -files and -archives are options to copy additional files (like any configuration files etc) that all the M/R tasks might need when running. Such files typically need to be transferred from the local machine where the job is launched to the cluster nodes where the tasks run. Think of them as convenient shortcuts to distribute files to all the tasks. Makes sense ? Thanks Hemanth From general-return-1759-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 09:19:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24659 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 09:19:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 09:19:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 37739 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:19:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37519 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:19:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37511 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 09:19:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:19:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:19:02 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o669H49A049106 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:17:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=O7XUMuVsm9WIHRHZoARJNSokCNIsm7lwHaObboqNMP+x9nB7s67XtcLivtXoD7hm Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:47:03 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:47:02 +0530 Subject: Re: Distributed Cache Thread-Topic: Distributed Cache Thread-Index: Acsc6OEaboUnXHGRTYir40pJ0i630QAAx04v Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C858F26619820amarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C858F26619820amarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If they are already in JT's FS, it does not copy them. It copies them only = if they are on local FS or some other FS. On 7/6/10 2:23 PM, "zhangguoping zhangguoping" w= rote: I wonder why hadoop wants to copy the files to jobtracker's filesystem. Since it is already in HDFS, it should be available to tasks. Any considerations? --_000_C858F26619820amarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1760-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 09:45:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31516 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 09:45:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 09:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 64107 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:45:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63402 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63385 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 09:45:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:45:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [87.248.114.165] (HELO web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com) (87.248.114.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:45:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 77114 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jul 2010 09:43:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278409420; bh=AtDlA2KF2ZbcE9isGlTF2hi7NlAy5Lxy0bKqnQTk2aI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P2sX5TGwKrSlZ2PN+ucfatogvOcT9fymQAMDGYadadmfI33G7T3rjim3OdH1rMt18ZuG8LcgnRZx81R8y3G/VEmJ1lF1MgLBvpCPq8T3rVoryJIvQEiFwS8TyTPIPqvGuXRpQzxAZ03+0/EckLXmnO3yCCh0cC6R0qPoSayeDs4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XG9tNkA2OnmJrNQ6MZ7S5IcMbaJ4daNkJ6fdiHqWNMwtxoXjrt2qvZDy1ICCqJLD5O805HahwFZxAyhvFfr2K27ma5B8OctDmoUDk9IvLCj+W6LUuPpen08DFcQd2Z+X+aQ8qNHcz2IOIEztmuV4aGWAHsIbGpsVi11k/0zH+vo=; Message-ID: <24760.76231.qm@web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: PB1DS2QVM1mWZRRgo9RaAIt37qcfEgLN_j4Q3oMaxe8jreF .X7alC61G5rDDcJMdD9Gdi_v1kYBs0CFNI4EIYTEaKgIW.v_15T03RaRoOWx Qkn8T452OC3wKItg9dXIS5Jm3nS5tSd4ecYBfWld.wZtzmSH1V3qUpKVNAub JIZXmu.yJY2r.vPS_FwDO0RYLfq3dSMiTwnfg Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:43:39 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:43:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Denim Live Subject: how to find the id of each map task? To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-300312025-1278409419=:76231" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-300312025-1278409419=:76231 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello I want to get the id of each mapper and reducer task because I want to tag the output of these mappers and reducers according to the mapper and reducer id. How can I retrieve the ids of each? Thanks --0-300312025-1278409419=:76231-- From general-return-1761-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 12:40:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81765 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 12:40:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 12:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1927 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 12:40:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1607 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 12:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1599 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 12:39:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:39:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:39:49 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.39508376; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:38:09 -0700 Received: from eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:38:09 -0700 Received: from EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com ([169.254.1.214]) by eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:38:08 -0500 From: "Kilbride, James P." To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:38:07 -0500 Subject: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Topic: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Index: AcsdCBYXCcXHK05oQgyZi/cl6sZ8dA== Message-ID: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 12:38:09.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[16E60BB0:01CB1D08] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, The examples in the hbase examples, and on the hadoop wiki all reference th= e deprecated interfaces of the mapred package. Are there any examples of ho= w to use hbase as the input for a mapreduce job, that uses the mapreduce pa= ckage instead? I'm looking to set up a job which will read from a hbase tab= le based on a row value passed into the job, and which starts the map the r= ow values(as the value key) and the column names(or value) as the map value= s. James Kilbride From general-return-1762-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 14:07:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7544 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 14:07:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 14:07:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 4418 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:07:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4150 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4142 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 14:06:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:06:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.25] (HELO col0-omc1-s15.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:06:50 +0000 Received: from COL117-W14 ([65.55.34.9]) by col0-omc1-s15.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:06:07 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_ecc786b2-3d21-445b-8cea-4116f6ae1387_" X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.33] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Why single thread for HDFS? Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:06:07 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,,,,,,,<5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com>,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 14:06:07.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[60E0FCA0:01CB1D14] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_ecc786b2-3d21-445b-8cea-4116f6ae1387_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Uhm... That's not really true. It gets a bit more complicated than that. If you're talking about M/R jobs=2C you don't want to do threads in your ma= p() routine=2C while this is possible=2C its going to be really hard to jus= tify the extra parallelism along with the need to wait for all of the threa= ds to complete before you can end the map() method.=20 If you're talking about a way to copy files from one cluster to another... = in hadoop... you can find out the block lists that make up the file. As lon= g as the file is static=2C meaning no one is writing/spliting/compacting th= e file=2C you could copy it. Here being multi threaded could work.=20 You'd have one thread per block that will read from one machine=2C and then= write directly to the other. Of course you'll need to figure out where to = write the block=2C or rather tie in to HDFS. This is more complex than a M/R job but will work. If you're reading from the cloud and then writing to the UNIX file system= =2C you want to write the blocks in serial order. (KISS). JMHO -Mike > Date: Tue=2C 6 Jul 2010 00:30:06 -0700 > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > From: gautam.singaraju@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > To add to Jay Booth's points=2C adding multi-threaded capability to HDFS > will bring down the performance. Consider a production server where > 4-5 jobs are running on a low-end commodity server. Currently=2C that is > 4 threads reading and writing from the hard disk. Making it a > multi-threaded read and write will create many threads (Number of Jobs > * Default HDFS Block size * 1024 KB/ file system block sizes). For a > low-end hard disk with limited RPM cycles=2C a higher number of threads > will decrease the performance. As the number of disk access increase > from 1=2C the throughput will increase. But after 3-4 parallel disk > accesses=2C the performance will start to decrease. You can use > performance analytics tools (like IOMeter) to identify the *ideal* > number of parallel disk accesses for a specified hard-disk. >=20 > --- > Gautam >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mon=2C Jul 5=2C 2010 at 8:46 PM=2C elton sky = wrote: > >>Basically=2C your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and c= ould > > be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded >design=2C itwould m= ake cp > > operations faster. > > What I mean is=2C if we have the size of a file we can parallel by calc= ulating > > blocks. Otherwise we couldn't. > > > > > > On Tue=2C Jul 6=2C 2010 at 10:47 AM=2C Allen Wittenauer > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 5=2C 2010=2C at 5:01 PM=2C elton sky wrote: > >> > Well=2C this sounds good when you have many small files=2C you conca= t() them > >> > into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and = copy > >> all > >> > a few blocks in parallel. > >> > >> Basically=2C your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and = could > >> be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded design=2C it would = make cp > >> operations faster. > >> > >> This sounds like a particularly high cost for an operation that is rar= ely > >> utilized. [This is much more interesting in a distcp context=2C but e= ven then > >> not that great. distcp in my experience is usually used to push a bun= ch of > >> files=2C so you get your parallelism at the file level. Typically the= se are > >> part files are usually the same approx. size.] > >> > >> > >> > > =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search=2C chat and e-mail from your inb= ox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1= --_ecc786b2-3d21-445b-8cea-4116f6ae1387_-- From general-return-1763-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 14:11:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8464 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 14:11:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 14:11:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 15278 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15184 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15176 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 14:11:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.17 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.17] (HELO col0-omc1-s7.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:11:29 +0000 Received: from COL117-W33 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s7.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:10:46 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_808c5ad0-cf97-4c6c-ad9f-170321d51d62_" X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.33] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Why single thread for HDFS? Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:10:46 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,,,,,,,<5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 14:10:46.0909 (UTC) FILETIME=[0797AAD0:01CB1D15] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_808c5ad0-cf97-4c6c-ad9f-170321d51d62_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If all you want to do is to have a faster -cp option=2C then if you know yo= ur intial block list and location=2C you need to generate the target bloc l= ist and then create a single thread per block and process each block in a s= eparate thread. You don't need to use the local disk and just read/write each block in 'pag= ed' increments. (pages as in 4/16/32/64K page sizes.)=20 (This removes the i/o argument raised by another poster.) This may be faster than the current process. HTH -Mike > Date: Tue=2C 6 Jul 2010 13:46:34 +1000 > Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? > From: eltonsky9404@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > >Basically=2C your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and co= uld > be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded >design=2C itwould mak= e cp > operations faster. > What I mean is=2C if we have the size of a file we can parallel by calcul= ating > blocks. Otherwise we couldn't. >=20 >=20 > On Tue=2C Jul 6=2C 2010 at 10:47 AM=2C Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >=20 > > > > On Jul 5=2C 2010=2C at 5:01 PM=2C elton sky wrote: > > > Well=2C this sounds good when you have many small files=2C you concat= () them > > > into a big one. I am talking about split a big file into blocks and c= opy > > all > > > a few blocks in parallel. > > > > Basically=2C your point is that hadoop dfs -cp is relatively slow and c= ould > > be made faster. If HDFS had a more multi-threaded design=2C it would m= ake cp > > operations faster. > > > > This sounds like a particularly high cost for an operation that is rare= ly > > utilized. [This is much more interesting in a distcp context=2C but ev= en then > > not that great. distcp in my experience is usually used to push a bunc= h of > > files=2C so you get your parallelism at the file level. Typically thes= e are > > part files are usually the same approx. size.] > > > > > > =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your = inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2= --_808c5ad0-cf97-4c6c-ad9f-170321d51d62_-- From general-return-1764-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 15:31:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31685 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 15:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 15:31:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28078 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 15:31:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27919 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 15:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27906 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 15:31:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:31:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:31:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F981BA743 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:30:52 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q3AaZm7jrrmg for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:30:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9371BA732 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:30:51 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1279035039.80413@Q0yHY460Y2nBaKfZqrqJ0Q Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o66FUcgj025309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:30:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C334C20.9010105@apache.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:30:40 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? References: ,,,,,,,<5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com>,, In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o66FUcgj025309 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Michael Segel wrote: > Uhm... > > That's not really true. It gets a bit more complicated than that. > > If you're talking about M/R jobs, you don't want to do threads in your map() routine, while this is possible, its going to be really hard to justify the extra parallelism along with the need to wait for all of the threads to complete before you can end the map() method. > > If you're talking about a way to copy files from one cluster to another... in hadoop... you can find out the block lists that make up the file. As long as the file is static, meaning no one is writing/spliting/compacting the file, you could copy it. Here being multi threaded could work. > You'd have one thread per block that will read from one machine, and then write directly to the other. Of course you'll need to figure out where to write the block, or rather tie in to HDFS. There's a paper by Russ Perry using HDFS as a filestore for raster processing, where he modified DfsClient to get all the locations of a file, and let the caller decide where to read blocks from. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2009/HPL-2009-345.html the advantage of this is that the caller can do the striping across machines, keep every server busy by asking for files from each of them. Of course, this ignores the trend to many-HDD servers; DfsClient can't currently see which physical disk a file is on, which you'd need if the client wanted to keep every disk on every server busy during a big read From general-return-1765-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 16:11:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45403 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 16:11:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 16:11:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 78363 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78304 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78296 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 16:11:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:11:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:11:03 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1679177gxk.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LhNdTvoYnIj6fYa4MCyLJBYdLN5M2KtrLSkgnBrzjAc=; b=MgLTz9Si+uRU5G7BNVbezV6z4rtGQv/u3qG7JK7D3wes83r4MT7sLx8LzY6OLPd+eV 4iwIcUPkyTwitGe5u0hVEPG2Qz/EnlPFT20ncxvYcpnJjY0crf1MzvAG6ocCHcnMOcn/ tdoHGVWPhx/A2uorafhbBth1Y4waVW14nTG5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=C95UOn8kHXYAZvIqeQR8riTINr2r656dvfcRcxnK8J9w3sp6+XjdrdsukR/UeSKER9 jotXVpFlRdC+c7IZo9MxQQJZqRZjEdhBbQ1kGCFW7Vy1k6DYVZ7gbHeIUg7afGd82wQE 8RbAbaSzeGdSYwJJwgQRgNKefdXON9YqPjdeo= Received: by 10.229.235.197 with SMTP id kh5mr2843307qcb.237.1278432641518; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.231.142 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:40:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I believe this article will help you understand the new (not anymore) API+HBase MR: http://kdpeterson.net/blog/2009/09/minimal-hbase-mapreduce-ex= ample.html [Look at the second example, which uses the Put object] On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Kilbride, James P. wrote: > All, > > The examples in the hbase examples, and on the hadoop wiki all reference = the deprecated interfaces of the mapred package. Are there any examples of = how to use hbase as the input for a mapreduce job, that uses the mapreduce = package instead? I'm looking to set up a job which will read from a hbase t= able based on a row value passed into the job, and which starts the map the= row values(as the value key) and the column names(or value) as the map val= ues. > > James Kilbride > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-1766-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 16:41:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52034 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 16:41:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 16:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 18992 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:41:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18950 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18942 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 16:41:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:41:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:41:22 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.39553526; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:39:43 -0700 Received: from eadc01-cahprd02.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.12]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:39:42 -0700 Received: from EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com ([169.254.1.214]) by eadc01-cahprd02.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.12]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:38:53 -0500 From: "Kilbride, James P." To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:38:51 -0500 Subject: RE: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Topic: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Index: AcsdJe0ESW8pcpuYRAaV7qn4wbxLbAAAq/WQ Message-ID: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 16:39:42.0902 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5DBFD60:01CB1D29] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is an interesting start but I'm really interested in the opposite dire= ction, where hbase is the input to my map reduce job, and then I'm going to= push some data into reducers which ultimately I'm okay with them just writ= ing it to a file. I get the impression that I need to set up a TableInputFormat type of objec= t. But I since job only allows you to do setInputFormatClass, I'm not sure = how to dynamically configure the inputFormatClass to accept some parameters= to limit the input format scan on the table to only specific rows. Here's = the general thrust of what I'm trying to do with MapReduce and HBase. I have a table called People which has rows of people(names, ids, whatever = is used for identifying a person in the system). That table also has a colu= mn family called relatives where the column ids are the names of relatives = for the person. I want to pass into the inputFormat object the names of the= people I want it to look up. And the mapper should get the persons name as= the key and the columnFamily relatives as the value(that's the result of t= he scan limitations I'm putting into place).=20 I then will retrieve the relatives(in the map function), look at relationsh= ips between them and push onto the context the relatives name(keyOut) and a= floating point value(valueOut). The reducer will combine all these floatin= g point values for each relative and output(in a file is fine) the relative= s name and cumulative score. But I can't seem to figure out how to set up a job that uses the TableInput= Format I want, and which also allows me to set the parameter for it so that= it will only give me the people I ask for when I run the program not the e= ntire table.=20 Does this make any sense? James Kilbride -----Original Message----- From: Harsh J [mailto:qwertymaniac@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:10 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples I believe this article will help you understand the new (not anymore) API+HBase MR: http://kdpeterson.net/blog/2009/09/minimal-hbase-mapreduce-ex= ample.html [Look at the second example, which uses the Put object] On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Kilbride, James P. wrote: > All, > > The examples in the hbase examples, and on the hadoop wiki all reference = the deprecated interfaces of the mapred package. Are there any examples of = how to use hbase as the input for a mapreduce job, that uses the mapreduce = package instead? I'm looking to set up a job which will read from a hbase t= able based on a row value passed into the job, and which starts the map the= row values(as the value key) and the column names(or value) as the map val= ues. > > James Kilbride > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-1767-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 16:54:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54961 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 16:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 16:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 35904 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:53:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35449 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 16:53:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35354 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 16:53:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:53:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:53:49 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1718232gxk.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=9z43/BaInM50DAjplqBZb3htX2KumwOLRsg3P0Z9o7I=; b=J1j5VwwerVnv+KTYHQNoAwDFu8kkp+Sp16LGKzv+736GYNAvcnKi0iY/YfutYBBaOr Ws2QFWEWyJU7itLmVPzAqaaDeflhfm/FJmj8/FwNYpICB5y1KWazxd0gXzU7h6IYeBM+ JUKu1rJvBMOSPFC5bh7QBjSZTpAwH/nURlZW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZQom9v0mktIQirw6zfr2wu1CUWT+lJI2TYwbo3UR/mxwC2GxW2RaQ4ah2MhaclU7qa B7RjPYBshoe1sfKT8BeqwXHQHmuzVQOrlOCeefvjPAhc1FD4ReItUO2IKFKFjpHcN97k /DFblARhPU/Qx2XdMeVk2ViJElDo+60GpcMtQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.79.144 with SMTP id p16mr353339qak.247.1278435208316; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.44.139 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:53:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G31SyVsbWfc4bSsEzUoXO4WCKek Message-ID: Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9b0b7f75cdd6048abae41d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f9b0b7f75cdd6048abae41d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > Does this make any sense? > > Not in a MapReduce context, what you want to do is a LIKE with a bunch of values right? Since a mapper will always read all the input that it's given (minus some filters like you can do with HBase), whatever you do will always end up being a full table scan. You "could" solve your problem by configuring your Scan object with a RowFilter that knows about the names you are looking for, but that still ends up being a full scan on the region server side so it will be slow and will generate a lot of IO. WRT examples, HBase ships with a couple of utility classes that can also be used as examples. The Export class has the Scan configuration stuff: http://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.20/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/Export.java J-D --00c09f9b0b7f75cdd6048abae41d-- From general-return-1768-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 17:02:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56702 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 45074 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:02:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45013 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:02:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45005 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:02:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:02:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:02:31 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.39557778; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:02:00 -0700 Received: from eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:02:06 -0700 Received: from EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com ([169.254.1.214]) by eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:02:05 -0500 From: "Kilbride, James P." To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:02:02 -0500 Subject: RE: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Topic: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Index: AcsdK9eOc56LPevEQsq5cO35WNA8ZgAAEZjQ Message-ID: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49DA6@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 17:02:06.0291 (UTC) FILETIME=[F694E230:01CB1D2C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, if that's the case, and you argument makes sense understanding how scan= versus get works, I'd have to write a custom InputFormat class that looks = like the TableInputFormat class, but uses a get(or series of gets) rather t= han a scan object as the current table mapper does?=20 James Kilbride -----Original Message----- From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Dani= el Cryans Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:53 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples > > > Does this make any sense? > > Not in a MapReduce context, what you want to do is a LIKE with a bunch of values right? Since a mapper will always read all the input that it's given (minus some filters like you can do with HBase), whatever you do will alway= s end up being a full table scan. You "could" solve your problem by configuring your Scan object with a RowFilter that knows about the names yo= u are looking for, but that still ends up being a full scan on the region server side so it will be slow and will generate a lot of IO. WRT examples, HBase ships with a couple of utility classes that can also be used as examples. The Export class has the Scan configuration stuff: http://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.20/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/m= apreduce/Export.java J-D From general-return-1769-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 17:12:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62646 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:12:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 58844 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58809 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58801 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:11:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:11:52 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1734307gxk.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:11:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=bPxyY67fF5ENGzxSf1bAuV5oxwKUwoZ7XwNHjvmQCfc=; b=u5LTgNJR0AHFaq67kfUc7OWACjRm9o+rVGipTeK9+We381CwdjDc9ghQwUaJFidd9J 9cCRtZNPkiS4IFF6LyoL9e7Whvjhuss8GUGajQDfdpLqiBYLO4DC3aKSPmuF0RR6guXy +xinOW6pH5Zkud17ea4+5mN43FvOpmNPydiMo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=thCFK5HHkhYQbSQZZ2txIQz4RzvQkcNfUGeHpbei7NE+aeKaW9DeEWVtB3SDezhrGs zjRE6bSI45/X6y3jMrLSexiGL4o6lj3Z091Qs9jOrnMy/Zerhi5iE2YXJSJyg5jKVQLv 7VJzFwrOMv4whnR4AdLaBqXMnSrjCC7qkiiQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.115.27 with SMTP id g27mr2667300qaq.369.1278436291396; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.44.139 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:11:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49DA6@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49DA6@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:11:31 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GsiyXEepbgb15VVEPPwgT6GAiWo Message-ID: Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9b09f50446e7048abb2534 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f9b09f50446e7048abb2534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That won't be very efficient either... are you trying to do this for a real time user request. If so, it really isn't the way you want to go. If you are in a batch processing situation, I'd say it depends on how many rows you have VS how many you need to retrieve eg scanning 2B rows only to find 10 rows really doesn't make sense. How do you determine which users you need to process? How big is your dataset? I understand that you wish to use the MR-provided functionalities of grouping and such, but simply issuing a bunch of Gets in parallel may just be easier to write and maintain. J-D On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kilbride, James P. < James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com> wrote: > So, if that's the case, and you argument makes sense understanding how scan > versus get works, I'd have to write a custom InputFormat class that looks > like the TableInputFormat class, but uses a get(or series of gets) rather > than a scan object as the current table mapper does? > > James Kilbride > > -----Original Message----- > From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Jean-Daniel Cryans > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:53 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples > > > > > > > Does this make any sense? > > > > > Not in a MapReduce context, what you want to do is a LIKE with a bunch of > values right? Since a mapper will always read all the input that it's given > (minus some filters like you can do with HBase), whatever you do will > always > end up being a full table scan. You "could" solve your problem by > configuring your Scan object with a RowFilter that knows about the names > you > are looking for, but that still ends up being a full scan on the region > server side so it will be slow and will generate a lot of IO. > > WRT examples, HBase ships with a couple of utility classes that can also be > used as examples. The Export class has the Scan configuration stuff: > > http://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.20/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/Export.java > > J-D > --00c09f9b09f50446e7048abb2534-- From general-return-1770-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 17:53:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70878 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:53:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:53:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 5278 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:53:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5154 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5146 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:53:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:53:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [137.100.120.43] (HELO mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com) (137.100.120.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:53:01 +0000 Received: from ([160.207.224.15]) by mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5202712.275883862; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:50:58 -0500 Received: from eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) by mnbm01-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:50:57 -0500 Received: from EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com ([169.254.1.214]) by eadc01-cahprd01.ad.gd-ais.com ([10.120.80.11]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:50:58 -0500 From: "Kilbride, James P." To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:50:55 -0500 Subject: RE: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Topic: MapReduce HBASE examples Thread-Index: AcsdLtmMqeDVDfbaQD6ko2+gKHt7DQAAumcA Message-ID: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49E2B@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49DA6@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2010 17:50:57.0991 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA02CD70:01CB1D33] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm assuming the rows being pulled back are smaller than the full row set o= f the entire database. So say the 10 out of 2B case. But, each row has a co= lumn family who's 'columns' are actually rowIds in the database. (basically= my one to many relationship mapping). I'm not trying to use MR for the ini= tial get of 10 columns, but rather the fact that each of those 10 initial r= ows generates potentially hundreds or thousands of other calls.=20 I am trying to do this for a real time user request, but I expect the total= processing to take some time so it's more of a user initiated call. There = also may be dozens of users making the request at any given time so I want = to farm this out into the MR world so that multiple instances of the job ca= n be running(with completely different starting rows) at any given time.=20 I could do this using a serialized local process but I explicitly want some= of my processing, which could take some time, happening out in the map red= uce world to take advantage of spare cycles elsewhere, as well as potential= data locality and the fact that it is a parallelizable problem seems to im= ply that M/R would be a logical way to do it. James Kilbride -----Original Message----- From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Dani= el Cryans Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:12 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples That won't be very efficient either... are you trying to do this for a real time user request. If so, it really isn't the way you want to go. If you are in a batch processing situation, I'd say it depends on how many rows you have VS how many you need to retrieve eg scanning 2B rows only to find 10 rows really doesn't make sense. How do you determine which users yo= u need to process? How big is your dataset? I understand that you wish to use the MR-provided functionalities of grouping and such, but simply issuing a bunch of Gets in parallel may just be easier to write and maintain. J-D On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kilbride, James P. < James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com> wrote: > So, if that's the case, and you argument makes sense understanding how sc= an > versus get works, I'd have to write a custom InputFormat class that looks > like the TableInputFormat class, but uses a get(or series of gets) rather > than a scan object as the current table mapper does? > > James Kilbride > > -----Original Message----- > From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Jean-Daniel Cryans > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:53 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples > > > > > > > Does this make any sense? > > > > > Not in a MapReduce context, what you want to do is a LIKE with a bunch of > values right? Since a mapper will always read all the input that it's giv= en > (minus some filters like you can do with HBase), whatever you do will > always > end up being a full table scan. You "could" solve your problem by > configuring your Scan object with a RowFilter that knows about the names > you > are looking for, but that still ends up being a full scan on the region > server side so it will be slow and will generate a lot of IO. > > WRT examples, HBase ships with a couple of utility classes that can also = be > used as examples. The Export class has the Scan configuration stuff: > > http://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.20/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase= /mapreduce/Export.java > > J-D > From general-return-1771-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 19:16:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5050 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 19:16:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 19:16:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 96679 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 19:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96621 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 19:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96613 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 19:16:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:16:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.216.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.216.154] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.216.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:16:08 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o66JFivV002916; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:15:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from apache@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.4/Submit) id o66JFisO002913; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:15:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: apache set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from proxyout.lanl.gov (proxyout.lanl.gov [192.12.184.2]) by mail.cs.ucf.edu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:15:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20100706151543.15177jed70raesws@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:15:43 -0400 From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org, abc xyz Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce References: <351370.62305.qm@web46308.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <790746.6243.qm@web46312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <790746.6243.qm@web46312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 Oh, of course it will. From what I know about using this it just allows you to launch 1 job instead of several. Every time a Map/Reduce pair finishes it will dump to the HDFS (or whatever you're using) - Grant Quoting abc xyz : > one option can be to use multiple chained jobs using JobControl object. > But can anyone tell whether in this case the output of first job be > written to > the disk? Actually I want to minimize access to the disk. > > Cheers > > > > ________________________________ > From: Fariha Atta > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:45:12 AM > Subject: Re: Chaining Map-Reduce > > But it provides chaining like Map+ | Reduce | Map* i.e. we can use only one > reducer. > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Venkatesh S wrote: > >> You could use ChainMapper and ChainReducer API in hadoop. >> > > > > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From general-return-1772-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 06 21:39:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45654 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 21:39:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 21:39:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 56375 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 21:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56282 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 21:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56274 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 21:39:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:39:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:39:35 +0000 Received: by yxj4 with SMTP id 4so932435yxj.35 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ZEdaa6EM+GfwVOYDjs+RJXMc6OLBBjW9eWyJ4JKYHxM=; b=JzEZMSOdDx5kfQjkrLk3oDFDoSjvUlNYml7UR8B8hKsZ9RiMXQumpiZZw5gip0IFOa xm7bGrbKEfVdfAZfe4C/1yNUGszS0CmU2ZLz9QUgvywdldVFIxzUHTdwclsCqvu47r2Y s6iBejTHg979J7eMSOkKhGywi04bPSlLA+X2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NCKB0hl3gZbSHiUNpZlY+uyQgZLxVcSZtcGgSFMKvMmYm79ujfl5Q4eN2QwoFlUesj CSIN8o4j5il+tit0MFAKLZL3K4GlUIhKlJoxeakbHAEVJedJ7eho1lYzXzgHxc+hvP22 NbQdIUDVSB6b+AV6Mtwh2wrks+QSmqCCEBwPQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.248.195 with SMTP id mh3mr3157249qcb.206.1278452354383; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.44.139 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49E2B@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> References: <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFEEA6CD@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49D50@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49DA6@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> <035C7FA04C0BF64B8143C76523E7ED742FCFF49E2B@EADC01-MABPRD01.ad.gd-ais.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:39:14 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gmmMhjQpj7R87mIdsgizdHtZK0E Message-ID: Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64caa9e720207048abee21d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64caa9e720207048abee21d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (moving the thread to the HBase user mailing list, on reply please remove the general@ since this is not a general question) It is indeed a parallelizable problem that could use a job management system, but in your case I don't think MR is the right solution. You will have to do all sorts weird tweaks and in the end you won't get much out of it since you basically want to process a tiny portion of the whole dataset. You also talk about possible localisation, but I don't see that being a particularly strong argument in what you describe. Yes, you could start one mapper per region that contains some of the rows you are looking for, but the cost of starting and managing those JVMs is high compared to just starting one that does the work (since it can be done easily in a single process that can be multi-threaded). To sum up, using MR on a small dataset is basically having all the disadvantages for almost none of the advantages. Instead you could look into running Gearman (or similar) on those machines and that would give you exactly what you need IMHO. J-D On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Kilbride, James P. < James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com> wrote: > I'm assuming the rows being pulled back are smaller than the full row set > of the entire database. So say the 10 out of 2B case. But, each row has a > column family who's 'columns' are actually rowIds in the database. > (basically my one to many relationship mapping). I'm not trying to use MR > for the initial get of 10 columns, but rather the fact that each of those 10 > initial rows generates potentially hundreds or thousands of other calls. > > I am trying to do this for a real time user request, but I expect the total > processing to take some time so it's more of a user initiated call. There > also may be dozens of users making the request at any given time so I want > to farm this out into the MR world so that multiple instances of the job can > be running(with completely different starting rows) at any given time. > > I could do this using a serialized local process but I explicitly want some > of my processing, which could take some time, happening out in the map > reduce world to take advantage of spare cycles elsewhere, as well as > potential data locality and the fact that it is a parallelizable problem > seems to imply that M/R would be a logical way to do it. > > James Kilbride > > -----Original Message----- > From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Jean-Daniel Cryans > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 1:12 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples > > That won't be very efficient either... are you trying to do this for a real > time user request. If so, it really isn't the way you want to go. > > If you are in a batch processing situation, I'd say it depends on how many > rows you have VS how many you need to retrieve eg scanning 2B rows only to > find 10 rows really doesn't make sense. How do you determine which users > you > need to process? How big is your dataset? I understand that you wish to use > the MR-provided functionalities of grouping and such, but simply issuing a > bunch of Gets in parallel may just be easier to write and maintain. > > J-D > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Kilbride, James P. < > James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com> wrote: > > > So, if that's the case, and you argument makes sense understanding how > scan > > versus get works, I'd have to write a custom InputFormat class that looks > > like the TableInputFormat class, but uses a get(or series of gets) rather > > than a scan object as the current table mapper does? > > > > James Kilbride > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jdcryans@gmail.com [mailto:jdcryans@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > > Jean-Daniel Cryans > > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:53 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: MapReduce HBASE examples > > > > > > > > > > > Does this make any sense? > > > > > > > > Not in a MapReduce context, what you want to do is a LIKE with a bunch of > > values right? Since a mapper will always read all the input that it's > given > > (minus some filters like you can do with HBase), whatever you do will > > always > > end up being a full table scan. You "could" solve your problem by > > configuring your Scan object with a RowFilter that knows about the names > > you > > are looking for, but that still ends up being a full scan on the region > > server side so it will be slow and will generate a lot of IO. > > > > WRT examples, HBase ships with a couple of utility classes that can also > be > > used as examples. The Export class has the Scan configuration stuff: > > > > > http://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/0.20/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/Export.java > > > > J-D > > > --0016e64caa9e720207048abee21d-- From general-return-1773-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 07 01:13:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3583 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 01:13:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 01:13:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 33528 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 01:13:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33446 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 01:13:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33438 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 01:13:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:13:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:13:07 +0000 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so2807904qyk.14 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:11:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TIbkue3CeBg5Bg2hLA5D1c/D85w5WED7YDZVjgJVCAk=; b=Dp9XCObdeA1i1dQbpdTnvM+50PWJM9OjtMq2WQg/0qcr+12RP6NtGD87a8+iCmu0f+ 1VUoOkm8PwtAT8EXCdBTV5OIg5peHL7J9C+twIrUZmPC8gEMnvrRS3dJCXsKQ7Z+hZNt aDhApFU3OBEBcSYr0fgSjJw3oIqO6PQx99ZT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pIiC1wS+0yeMidT7CCRKaozLhf268h7E7o0e4e6RkNPvOkZDOfUnXPBelLCWrcFbqo G40du2Z9AljPgvPOkgRp8FuzXL8Kft2NeyaPycxowRltCc0aYxjWioJzEtj+6IRDHR/A mx4SftX44D82/AdinqgVhvVgAkqMXUnOVY21w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.106.4 with SMTP id v4mr3059802qao.305.1278465106149; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.189.134 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:11:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:11:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat deprecated? From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f83a5b8828406048ac1da23 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f83a5b8828406048ac1da23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Usually MultipleSequenceFileOutputFormat or MultipleTextOutputFormat is used. You need to use: jobConf.setOutputFormat() On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:29 AM, zhangguoping zhangguoping < zhangguoping96@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat deprecated? I did not > find @deprecated comments in source file in 0.20.2 > > But I cannot use following: > > job.setOutputFormatClass( > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputFormat > ) > > > The type does not match. > --00c09f83a5b8828406048ac1da23-- From general-return-1774-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 07 02:11:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17250 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 02:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 02:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 65131 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 02:11:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65073 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 02:11:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65065 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 02:11:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:11:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:11:32 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so2816810qyk.14 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:10:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZazK6nk6KOba8rmpkh7dVRJ6kplqof8mIw1ceI5Z7YY=; b=WzeCiTrDvTzO9zNIgrf67syFoYOvqM7muJTIhDHpkH+ZtB94X9Lka995OKlpjwFRcJ bHaoSl5SXu/Vf0EEmBdemmy0WEiS5vp0mRHVhlQal1vlfJ2FAJvWCwHBZoKHOE7CPxOM YdstIEW4mrt2es/22buZcBHmSV5vmhD12e1AU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WMKNki9qZ/jqN6Y6jz4G3+nACLlNx6XNK+xisM4vOQYEWydXqGlGxr9VlmCiFpwGE0 PsXF07mmQWUg/ujy9cXWKcUsVlrmwSMTpIHO0keiOTKkkbWcx1yj5buNY+OxfbHftQ9M xko6IEPVHfEO1oIbJq5zYu86XIAw16Mf7QxUg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.52.32 with SMTP id f32mr3056206qag.352.1278468610981; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:10:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C334C20.9010105@apache.org> References: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> <4C334C20.9010105@apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:10:10 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88d2796a0155048ac2abad X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f88d2796a0155048ac2abad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Steve, Seems HP has done block based parallel reading from different datanodes. Though not from disk level, they achieve 4Gb/s rate with 9 readers (500Mb/s each). I didn't see anywhere I can download their code to play around, pity~ BTW, can we specify which disk to read from with Java? On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Michael Segel wrote: > >> Uhm... >> >> That's not really true. It gets a bit more complicated than that. >> >> If you're talking about M/R jobs, you don't want to do threads in your >> map() routine, while this is possible, its going to be really hard to >> justify the extra parallelism along with the need to wait for all of the >> threads to complete before you can end the map() method. >> If you're talking about a way to copy files from one cluster to another... >> in hadoop... you can find out the block lists that make up the file. As long >> as the file is static, meaning no one is writing/spliting/compacting the >> file, you could copy it. Here being multi threaded could work. You'd have >> one thread per block that will read from one machine, and then write >> directly to the other. Of course you'll need to figure out where to write >> the block, or rather tie in to HDFS. >> > > There's a paper by Russ Perry using HDFS as a filestore for raster > processing, where he modified DfsClient to get all the locations of a file, > and let the caller decide where to read blocks from. > > http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2009/HPL-2009-345.html > > the advantage of this is that the caller can do the striping across > machines, keep every server busy by asking for files from each of them. Of > course, this ignores the trend to many-HDD servers; DfsClient can't > currently see which physical disk a file is on, which you'd need if the > client wanted to keep every disk on every server busy during a big read > --00c09f88d2796a0155048ac2abad-- From general-return-1775-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 07 09:46:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25243 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 09:46:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 09:46:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 22302 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 09:46:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21971 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 09:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21963 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 09:46:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:46:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:46:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7739D1BA57D for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:45:45 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Aq2pHuOEInMQ for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:45:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7FD01BA440 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:45:44 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1279100732.30003@ZOlSYnGZ0XYm8yyStS/PgQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o679jUhV015208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:45:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C344CBC.4090307@apache.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:45:32 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? References: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> <4C334C20.9010105@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o679jUhV015208 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org elton sky wrote: > Steve, > > Seems HP has done block based parallel reading from different datanodes. yes; very much like IBM's GPFS, only with JBOD storage and the option of running code near the data when appropriate. > Though not from disk level, they achieve 4Gb/s rate with 9 readers (500Mb/s > each). > I didn't see anywhere I can download their code to play around, pity~ I do have access to that code if I can get at the right bit of the repository, if you really want me to look at it in detail ask, with the caveats that I'm away for the rest of the month and somewhat busy. Apart from that there's no reason why I shouldn't be able to make the changes to DfsClient public. Keep reminding me :) > BTW, can we specify which disk to read from with Java? > I think right now you get a list of blocks via DfsClient.getBlockLocations(); this is a list of hosts where blocks live. There is no data about which disk on the specific host. I belive that what Russ did was move the decisions from DfsInputStream -which picks a block location for you, with a bias to the local host- and instead lets the calling program make the decision as to where to fetch each block. This meant he could set the renderer up to request blocks from different hosts. He had tried to use the JT to schedule the rendering code, but that didn't work as MapReduce has the notion of "reduction": less data out than in, so it moves work to where the data is. In rendering it's more MapExpand; the operation is the transformation of PDF pages into 600dpi 32bpp bitmaps, which then need to be streamed to the (very large) printer at its print rate, in the correct order. It was easiest to have a specific machine on the cluster -with no datanodes or TTs- set up to do the rendering, and just ask the filesystem for where things are. Like I said, I don't think there was anything tricky done in DfsClient, more a matter of making some data known internally to the DfsClient code public, so that the client app can decide where to fetch data. If the DfsClient knew which HDD the data was on in a datanode, the client app could use that in its decision making too, so that if the 9 machines each had 6 HDDs, you could keep them all busy. From general-return-1776-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 07 17:01:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58860 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 17:01:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 17:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 95014 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 17:01:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94605 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 17:01:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94582 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 17:01:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:01:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of enis.soz.nutch@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:01:24 +0000 Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so1459460vws.35 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=03mY+A/fTqD/lW60i9GAlq/OFZBZG/wyUQoaxQlOdV8=; b=LICI/oBvOFXaTeQ2izbf5pQwSY/16G2OPW8CErbq7sCvMf/UcgAkc5jr0VaqEvQEs5 p9qmVzZ9LwwaGDn8vQMGdDfKmTVBY6kQND3njNl1D0cMTZ64geDReNKh2eCb5SR0OTYa UKjojj8BShYKrgT2+UZr9X0wy21jl6pb7URhw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Mo9/GL7mvxTYt/Bjup870oryHjFg4yQIXcMxzYEpKFvxU6C2tuUnNCH2P7ayZU9MoI DoVBmMdCzluR+xwEL+Aek3Y0gPKdrC1hkXW/kAUNjYRNv5R4xPHtMeyLN3Xyfzy3O08l B80KWUgcjdKY1i1Ul+QG7YXvoDk+IHm2Vxpzs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.76.74 with SMTP id b10mr3542937vck.78.1278522001850; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.106.145 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:00:01 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Introducing Gora, an ORM for NoSQL data stores From: Enis Soztutar To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@avro.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org, gora-dev@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64769e4c203c8048acf1962 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64769e4c203c8048acf1962 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, First off, sorry for cross-posting, but I think the announcement is relevan= t to hadoop, hbase and avro communities, all. We would like to introduce a new project, called Gora. Gora is a Java ORM layer for column stores, SQL databases, key-value stores and document databases. The design goal is to have a common API to access and manage multiple data stores. Gora differs from Java ORM frameworks, in that the special focus is given to column oriented data bases, like Apache HBase and Apache Cassandra. Gora, in no way, is a replacement for Hibernate, DataNucleus or [insert the name of your favorite ORM project]. But we think we differ from traditional data stores from the following perspectives. - Gora is specifically designed with NoSQL data stores in mind. For example, the API is based on pairs, rather than just beans. Also, we believe that the ORM layer should be tuned for batch operations (like first class object re-use support), - Gora uses Avro, to generate data beans from avro schemas. Moreover, most of the serializations are delegated to avro. For example, a map is serialized to a field (if not configured otherwise) using Avro serialization. - Gora provides first-class support for Hadoop MapReduce. DataStore implementations are responsible for partitioning the data (which is then converted to Hadoop Splits), and all the locality information is again obtained from the data store. Developing MapReduce jobs with Gora is really easy. - The long term goal for Gora is to be an intermediate data format for popular big-data and search related projects. In the middle term, we plan t= o support Cassandra, Cascading, Pig and Solr. Think of the possibilities when you can use the same data structures to persist objects to Hbase, SQL and Solr. And use Pig or Cascading in jobs to mine the data stored at HBase/Cassandra/SQL/etc. Gora works as follows. You define the data structures for your domain using regular Avro Json schemas. Then instead of compiling the avro files with Avro's compiler, you compile the files with GoraCompiler. Generated keep track of the persistency information along with the data. Then for each dat= a back-end, you define a mapping file which contains class fields to data store specific schema configuration. For example, HBase mapping files, define the column families, and mappings from fields to columns or column families, whereas SQL mapping files define mappings for table fields. Gora has started in NutchBase(http://github.com/dogacan/nutchbase), a branc= h of Apache Nutch(http://nutch.apache.org/) which is being used as a basis fo= r what will become Nutch 2.0. For the second version of the popular open source web search project, an abstraction layer was needed so that the core data structures for Nutch would no longer be kept as flat files on Hadoop. We wanted to be able to use popular NoSQL databases (HBase, Cassandra, Hypertable, etc), optionally flat files, and SQL databases (especially embedded zero-conf SQL databases). So Gora as a project was born. Gora is now in pre-alpha stage, with a public release planned before the en= d of the year. Documentation is also very sparse at this point. However, the code is already used at NutchBase and will be used in Nutch 2.0. We currently support HBase, plain Avro data files and SQL. Cassandra support i= s coming soon. Of course, the current set of developers is very small, and we need your help in achieving these goals. So feel free to contribute in any way you see fit. We believe in the Apache way of development and in fact, one of the possible paths for Gora is to be accepted as a sub project of Incubator or Hadoop (we welcome any feedback on this). Lastly, you can find the project at http://github.com/enis/gora/. Some example code is at http://github.com/enis/gora/tree/master/gora-core/src/examples/ and http://github.com/dogacan/nutchbase. Feel free to use this list, or gora-dev@googlegroups.com for further discussion. Thanks, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar tl;dr Gora is an ORM layer with a specific focus on NoSQL data stores. It has HBase, SQL, Avro and Mapreduce support. --0016e64769e4c203c8048acf1962-- From general-return-1777-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 07 18:32:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99989 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 18:32:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 18:32:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 50346 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 18:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50231 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 18:32:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50223 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 18:32:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:32:21 +0000 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so3007673pwj.23 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:31:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.215.7 with SMTP id n7mr8612979wfg.63.1278527517831; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.48.11 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:31:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Announcement: XLDB 4 From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: hadoop-general@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3039e8932ac048ad062b4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3039e8932ac048ad062b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, I'm helping put together a conference on scientific data management, and I think the Hadoop community has a lot to say on this front. If you have an interest in this area and will be in the Bay Area the first week of October, please read on! Otherwise, my apologies for the noise. 4th Extremely Large Databases (XLDB4) Conference October 6-7, 2010 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California XLDB, now including a conference open to all interested parties, is the gathering place for the community managing and analyzing data at extreme scale. Leading practitioners from science, industry, and academia will discuss lessons learned and real-world solutions for handling terabytes and petabytes of data. Experts will present emerging trends that will significantly impact how extremely large databases are built and used. More information, including the program, and online registration are available at . Space is limited, so if you would like to attend, make sure to register soon. Early registration ($100) ends on July 31; late registration is $150. If you are uncertain whether to attend, I would recommend reading the article recently written by Curt Monash: < http://www.dbms2.com/2010/07/01/why-you-should-go-to-xldb4/> For questions, please contact us by email using < xldb-admin@slac.stanford.edu> or contact me directly at . Regards, Jeff --000e0cd3039e8932ac048ad062b4-- From general-return-1778-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 01:19:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27721 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 01:19:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 01:19:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 50727 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 01:19:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50471 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 01:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50456 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 01:19:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:19:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.65.144.65] (HELO p01c11o142.mxlogic.net) (208.65.144.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:19:36 +0000 Received: from unknown [216.166.12.98] by p01c11o142.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.7.0-0) with SMTP id 297253c4.0.37537.00-359.95847.p01c11o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:19:16 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4c352794280f37ae-671998c7a9202917c62b6def895b8f0cb7835f9a Received: from AUSP01VMBX08.collaborationhost.net ([10.2.8.97]) by AUSP01MHUB07.collaborationhost.net ([10.2.8.242]) with mapi; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:18:57 -0500 From: Arun Ramakrishnan To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:18:56 -0500 Subject: rebalancing replication help Thread-Topic: rebalancing replication help Thread-Index: AcseOv4vjF6u6yf8SfScJKEMXDcPRAAAEigg Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C3AD6464AC81DC4AB14FFEA31391866A79321409AAAUSP01VMBX08c_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010070601)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [216.166.12.98] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=wbKXeunVgZ0A:10 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=IRTT+DMug4] X-AnalysisOut: [7mVLgYdXzmDg==:17 a=GBQTkU0xDUXbRKSuH2oA:9 a=GDFg6kl203xBh] X-AnalysisOut: [7Lwvs9DWpIHVtAA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Y2V] X-AnalysisOut: [NeNrzAAAA:8 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=TW66zc2HAAAA:8 a=HQ31llbKAA] X-AnalysisOut: [AA:8 a=KOJE2Elat-tJl6-joL0A:9 a=n_mscvfbrtTaj5My_nwA:7 a=e] X-AnalysisOut: [bbMM1CHFjmRuFgwP5J0u5ZpRi8A:4] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C3AD6464AC81DC4AB14FFEA31391866A79321409AAAUSP01VMBX08c_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like there is not much activity in the hdfs-user list. So, am reposti= ng it in the general list. Hi guys. I have a few related questions. I am going to layout the steps I have tak= en. Please comment on what I can do better. I was trying to to add 5 nodes to my existing 10 node cluster and also in= crease the replication factor from 2 to 3. I thought I don't have to run the balancer cause it would most likely put t= he new replicas into the new nodes. There are about 500k blocks. I wanted to get it all stabilized(replication and balancing) within 24 hour= s. Its more than 24 hours now and fsck reports 30% under replication. Is th= ere a way to force hdfs to use balance/replicate more aggressively. It would be great if someone explained what/when things happen to blocks in= the context of 1) Rebalancing 2) -setrep 3) Restarting cluster with a higher/lower replication factor. A few questions and a few issues here. 1) When you restart the cluster with a higher than previous replicatio= n value. Does it also apply to existing blocks or only to new blocks being = created ? 2) Does the balancer take into account under replication of blocks or = does it blindly start moving existing blocks to reach threshold ? A very specific problem . I am having this strange problem where the -setr= ep hangs on one particular block for hours. Is this because its corrupt ?. = But, fsck said its healthy. Thanks Arun --_000_C3AD6464AC81DC4AB14FFEA31391866A79321409AAAUSP01VMBX08c_-- From general-return-1779-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 01:38:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29447 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 01:38:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 01:38:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 67235 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 01:38:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67022 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 01:38:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67014 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 01:38:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:38:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:38:24 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so3359716qyk.14 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:37:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MUNMD0XZzjd87JD2QO5q6SmoWY31lWcNHe+8PWHh/fA=; b=rgASaW8ktU1vxn92QROuc9/zIf6bfr8BPIKylmlb+PnEO5qvxoU4JFAR/buDVoEnm9 9YypJZWWvPRJSK6PSNlo3UpuYdtMGLsHNVSdh+v6dxDs+EzeG0oPbJGFnKtKKTo3gqxM BBzy6Zm8/drlLAl7pdFMfpF6HAwZQ3wSRmz20= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RL4utIXZMruIHdh13AS2aDQH83qEA2X1zCzvOq/ktyl6NLno/SkQS4DwphMEAjd/Rx wBzTyUXcDomMivgYwmsNrCZP6h5qdjB2Q7s/oU9WukBoG96rbCKM2paYmsb29GP7pe9F C50X00ENwr9vvAl/T+b4loRnuk9p69FIcoXK8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.43.232 with SMTP id x40mr2192724qae.73.1278553023698; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 18:37:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C344CBC.4090307@apache.org> References: <5C9D1E1E-8299-4E97-B552-2DF69F5231BE@linkedin.com> <4C334C20.9010105@apache.org> <4C344CBC.4090307@apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:37:03 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why single thread for HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f89958dcdda02048ad65256 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f89958dcdda02048ad65256 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Steve, I do have access to that code if I can get at the right bit of the > repository, if you really want me to look at it in detail ask, with the > caveats that I'm away for the rest of the month and somewhat busy. Apart > from that there's no reason why I shouldn't be able to make the changes to > DfsClient public. Keep reminding me :) > Sounds great. can you please make me know (email or other) how can I access to that code. > > > I think right now you get a list of blocks via > DfsClient.getBlockLocations(); this is a list of hosts where blocks live. > There is no data about which disk on the specific host. > > I belive that what Russ did was move the decisions from DfsInputStream > -which picks a block location for you, with a bias to the local host- and > instead lets the calling program make the decision as to where to fetch each > block. This meant he could set the renderer up to request blocks from > different hosts. > > He had tried to use the JT to schedule the rendering code, but that didn't > work as MapReduce has the notion of "reduction": less data out than in, so > it moves work to where the data is. In rendering it's more MapExpand; the > operation is the transformation of PDF pages into 600dpi 32bpp bitmaps, > which then need to be streamed to the (very large) printer at its print > rate, in the correct order. It was easiest to have a specific machine on the > cluster -with no datanodes or TTs- set up to do the rendering, and just ask > the filesystem for where things are. > > Like I said, I don't think there was anything tricky done in DfsClient, > more a matter of making some data known internally to the DfsClient code > public, so that the client app can decide where to fetch data. If the > DfsClient knew which HDD the data was on in a datanode, the client app could > use that in its decision making too, so that if the 9 machines each had 6 > HDDs, you could keep them all busy. > Firstly, because nodes in a cluster are usually VMs. But if each vm attached to multiple physical disk, we can parallel; >If you're talking about M/R jobs, you don't want to do threads in your map() routine, while this is possible, its going to be really hard >to justify the extra parallelism along with the need to wait for all of the threads to complete before you can end the map() method. Secondly, I agree with Gautam, Micheal. In a MR job, maybe it's not good idea to read input parallely in map() method. Because map reads a line from HDFS each time to process. This solution looks simple & elegent, though it keeps the connection to source for a long time, until the end of map. I can think about some trick, like letting map() pull and process for the first block worth of input, and simultaneously pull the left input data to local disk of map() in other threads. But this sounds messy... Aside above 2, I think we can do disk level parallel. --00c09f89958dcdda02048ad65256-- From general-return-1780-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 07:51:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15898 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 07:51:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 07:51:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 40484 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 07:51:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39719 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 07:51:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39699 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 07:51:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:51:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [87.248.114.165] (HELO web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com) (87.248.114.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:51:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 37774 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2010 07:51:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278575469; bh=b0HBg+IpV38CeoWlkZfAH5wJVxzB671lxOkwMB1t8Ko=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YGGMdRzByw+MkhKJymSl3awvKS7EdpDVc/yO5uQSqaZDh9zjXfu1a2rcYHcJEoV9qDHQX968bq6qJfVeQXz1K/8oFDE+XxSEtDNBOv8jQUZU5zyhUDymMEXXdMlC3vr3FHsqQByJMSF8I7omyCE8acI9u00Qrxo3lwd46RfB+rA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LVC7jUFgm1pN0/aX8dSjwx39EmBpkHtz55Z6XfZMFmaRohJCyU5EaD9Gj2Rw1NA/1i0+I/yV0u31pjbeZFpsPs94rBZgNDBQCOTP9cevOccDPeKi3kpR/gpkC5WoJrCLFAOCqAY7H5mggI5acFlnBZdmg017PFg8VxUY9YgXIYo=; Message-ID: <328470.31709.qm@web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Yd6XupsVM1lkgG59mHbrfgxq3VtXk5eDz0ps1IGDI2LBp0U JO_DUDkKPWidy.p3x6TIz8NMBovrXjzkgsYcLINjG3ijY_Bcp3yXtE_YZd.c .wk2G4b.AhLYunfZVdd1v9nvPlQBeKzkqyFbNgmlVygAIjHgnP0ab.jpahn5 A7U2q_Cl9DqldBkcz777rZEGNYrMa9TFL5h4f Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web24101.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:51:09 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:51:09 +0000 (GMT) From: Denim Live Subject: Finding the time it took for a mapreduce job to get executed To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1904840433-1278575469=:31709" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1904840433-1278575469=:31709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi folks, I want to determine the exact time it took for my mapreduce job to get executed for some anaylsis purpose. How can I calculate it? Thanks --0-1904840433-1278575469=:31709-- From general-return-1781-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 08:09:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22695 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 08:09:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 50706 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 08:09:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50675 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 08:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50667 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 08:09:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:09:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:08:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F095311DBAF4 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:37:06 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id utawjIFMvHOn for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:37:02 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4598B11DBAF0 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:37:02 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:38:26 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: jni files Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050806000704060908020706" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------050806000704060908020706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I developed a project which is using some native jni files (liblemur_jni.so), earlier i use to run application jar by using -Djava.library.path=/PATH_TO_JNI_FILES, but am not able to the same with ./hadoop jar command. I followed http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.18.3/native_libraries.html 1. First copy the library to the HDFS. bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal mylib.so.1 /libraries/mylib.so.1 2. The job launching program should contain the following: DistributedCache.createSymlink(conf); DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); 3. The map/reduce task can contain: System.loadLibrary("mylib.so"); but getting error : Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: Call to* /192.168.0.153:50075* failed on local exception: java.io.EOFException at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:775) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy1.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:207) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:170) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1390) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:196) at org.apache.hadoop.filecache.DistributedCache.getTimestamp(DistributedCache.java:506) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.configureCommandLineOptions(JobClient.java:640) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:761) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:432) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.waitForCompletion(Job.java:447) at com.i4dweb.trobo.grid.WordCountNew.main(WordCountNew.java:49) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:156) Caused by: java.io.EOFException at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:375) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.receiveResponse(Client.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:446) Please advice. -- Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. --------------050806000704060908020706-- From general-return-1782-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 08:56:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31104 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 08:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 08:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 99176 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 08:56:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98817 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 08:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98799 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 08:56:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:56:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.169] (HELO web46304.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:56:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 57037 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2010 08:56:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278579380; bh=/JFpmzy5kxbeqd88J2jwrEYcw7sVWwTc+DiunYF9A7g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WRb0A/+Emrh4P8XDzJOeLvF1/VPKUB2Bdz5wnwZN/RO5QhgmvVSRTyp6U0oCsuLKGbSNxzjJvssJOBFQQmhTYPnx8NsDjaJ8WrSfik/180EvjsJd/r9RmB068cTh/Nft05sTL3jzecVk/Eq3CUIlp00fQGgAmmJdr9B8ezZqvp8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YEMt1oF0CPOPZSIAK6I6yfw3m5Jlc5bbKYllLADzeoQJvaBXhuyMdZrY+sGJI3TANFxJ4WnHSJQ3MRTvAG8cmdKT00GWnQ+4w6FFWURpiOPeamV3eo+Y778FEAc5qL9sJ55Mbs2h4+k/Yz52GtvxJWTDfcWEhOPDJ9k8MazbZxM=; Message-ID: <287553.55933.qm@web46304.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: zDKRh5MVM1mn0A1zEDyQECjtwwzuZkVgRwxbTzdmA.CS.0g 3jBPW9NP7FNc9Y9bNtp08i.vtYTfud_I9uQpzH_ehDajz9uSiZKa0aN7JZHF DTra7T8QmEPeLodYIMyQ4MoFvSZ2nDWj1.5.6JF0eNUb7TuWX2cxJ8pF9wkJ U2Uk0CzZ_EZkrgqL01gohDnX5ylhlqALHh3ixobfsF6zO2Jj33jhpo4PwMuw .O7SHxgbAApZTsRvthhDCXCuep_heE.qcXakVQmJQqDLPtkhH2RqXGWJugRE LDeDX6jM5vWDEZtMHbEBdmB._905XtfGg1n8- Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46304.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:56:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.276605 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:56:20 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: getting the partition number in a reducer to which a key-value pair belongs To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1148301366-1278579380=:55933" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1148301366-1278579380=:55933 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello everyone, when i am processing a given key-{set of values} pair in reducer function, how can I get the partition number to which this key-{set of values} belong to? How is it possible to get this partition number without adding extra information about the partition number with each key-value pair during partitioning? Cheers --0-1148301366-1278579380=:55933-- From general-return-1783-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 09:13:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38432 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 09:13:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 09:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 27090 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 09:13:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26878 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 09:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26866 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 09:13:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:13:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.166] (HELO web46301.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.166) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:13:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 16562 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2010 09:13:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278580394; bh=Ioyj8+wQUEhZvtLEzDwX8MxEh3hgWox8+yvS5/oufAg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p8dLWh9sqIJt0N9DjGrFNIYc2/ByG6arHsKUm+9j3F9ynGWAHbDbtwglw1tfrZMe/6TcKL4gT6V1v5EiM5E/rOWqzxM7KxweoDUCWT6AvG2GoRJ3JeH5LQspsXCDAaqyTgxci3IERkatQcy8SHaSwy6lg/Z3eHb/c41s/F+wCF4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6KpwsUVJh3hQXuTal6JhdWkwKNnmuUExsIqqf2c6OLo6cRAUFPr8WN+V4YDGfrYIFG/FWYShb71yVjRKNvBCB8f9bHdWGQNUC4oEiX9RrOYe69Lh3fBafYwUUbWP+YqZi/ly8gQpQAMVEZ0Oquud17oHOVV/A5xF1aWFvsBFPK4=; Message-ID: <300130.9635.qm@web46301.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: pczUS6wVM1lz8xs8r7BIjg6MvekqsI0_jQz5sOC8JB34xQu uOngel4rQbom7Fz2FYf.qIBc7nGDXYWvAircHK9Fcx894RnftsSABITSBTjH qmXwq.lqWPbKvfb9FMTRVPOcuKORrv_1lZmEsGYNNcprrFnvLohVAGclKzQN 6cf0zPEoTjVyKllFzBS4SuWZWPNsZAndRQaL_NCrsReIzmSHWH13chR0Oo74 5BJt9oOf6dY4HrI5tnwAKrjfHUuwO.at8eU.h2afemJTObxwz2c_l62i_0.w 8_4yxkO6VAV5bF4_HGsfgh5s6JS9TQIP.IRmi Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46301.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:13:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.276605 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 02:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: naming the output fle of reduce to the partition number To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-780567361-1278580394=:9635" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-780567361-1278580394=:9635 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Everyone, I am having some problem with naming the output file of each reduce task with the partition number. First of all, how can I get the partition number within each reduce? Second, How am I going to name the output file with that partition number? I have looked to the MultipleTextOutputFormat. It can generate a new file with the name of my choice for each key. But I want to name the output file for each partition with the name of my choice i.e. with the partition number. Please help me in this regard. Thanks --0-780567361-1278580394=:9635-- From general-return-1784-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 09:35:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43205 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 09:35:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 09:35:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 62098 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 09:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61700 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 09:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61687 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 09:35:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:35:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.168] (HELO web46303.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:35:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 73291 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2010 09:34:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278581686; bh=usJmeLvnQSGFptpaO/pfyI7spQQCzuHCcETUndVKZGc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tOXaRsagHEPlgM7Fmu3G632pniJ/+0wv10RUOGnTfYE4tJVlFyQwnrmU1UCwhWiCPAmgi1r38nFgt7UTiAuuzOac64KX6H4hspLQLOSlbAJ0CxhtxmyMqRM01Y7JWFh6i+EFVJk7JhAdHhbPR6479SXb7yPZcTayO4lc0noPus0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BYqNGneOOZo6ljmdjjtYNHLH0V4fU/ix6rJzFl11xg7u00ewLltD8T32SPa1/GGxmMK1iL5mVc3lrfr8G6rTgPsVA8gScMQ5FVHIXHeXVS6dGJ/t1vMlvHUcxsQLQ4Ex6T+NTtcYBUxynNd82TGDvy/wiZfENCU3un3rjShBJcY=; Message-ID: <383036.66480.qm@web46303.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: imK5t70VM1kFwlvdv.hrEgG1AYCpk3ZzHUWvtiLoHHZJeZm PwPfY.gRoQwNhZ_4_hVmVulDmOFYO3nZ6W2Sa5NOl2mdcL2sj7JPFqL1hDkz vz1AmVbU3vhfaISwi06c.YmB2NG9refRVBB3mIvmKwj1jW8unkSP1ihZkCA6 x0r391io614G_j5_KKU6V_dw3nlWv4muhuNgEHCpKK0Ffauihzq2dBeEJG.t WsWMgXg_WJ4Qrr7TcSiVTGmKhJ9N.jZt6JwAXuXqs1LmrcZAIUiYC_YwS7M1 0I8rGYzBMXybcZmGm4s5eFFIybpA2D3.HUCzWQSY28LMxBWdhA2Zhr3wFhIi ZSZaQvSbS Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46303.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:34:46 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.276605 References: <287553.55933.qm@web46304.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 02:34:46 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Re: getting the partition number in a reducer to which a key-value pair belongs To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <287553.55933.qm@web46304.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1465763519-1278581686=:66480" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1465763519-1278581686=:66480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This has worked for me: jobconf.getInt( "mapred.task.partition", 0); in the reducer. ________________________________ From: abc xyz To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 9:56:20 AM Subject: getting the partition number in a reducer to which a key-value pair belongs Hello everyone, when i am processing a given key-{set of values} pair in reducer function, how can I get the partition number to which this key-{set of values} belong to? How is it possible to get this partition number without adding extra information about the partition number with each key-value pair during partitioning? Cheers --0-1465763519-1278581686=:66480-- From general-return-1785-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 17:27:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91771 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 17:27:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 17:27:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 61625 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 17:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61438 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 17:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61430 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 17:27:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:27:22 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=d/qM3Yd/htXdff5crizTCEadVlAKh6B0xsiDVgU6ydW5OxVso0U6eM+o fa4B+9FJylWKjsvCOakFMUR26F7hMEAGH7UoDn1xgOO78GuxRVXmCBO4/ GUSsFwfycWc31Us; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1278610042; x=1310146042; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20jni=20files|Date:=20Thu,=208=20Jul=2020 10=2017:27:00=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9 606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201 .0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20 |In-Reply-To:=20<4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> |References:=20<4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com>; bh=2sWaZZpqHubMqloRFnrXr2LdQ5eMLaewfYHraE6PEcs=; b=glUz1suV+KFYD8pzYCvuk1j9V+Q68WPfW0hOI/X6ggsFv2GkgiVqlS9D taOBiewwv94Ca/exMrunacX0q0gBvHAAGQmHPz+UPhMlpRXeImp1TI0rS CutYafWtL548+OF; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,559,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="13912495" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:27:01 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: jni files Thread-Topic: jni files Thread-Index: AQHLHnTVV1c7eHpkqEaCeEw37pEITJKnvfoA Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:27:00 +0000 Message-ID: <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> In-Reply-To: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: > DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* > /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); Do you actually have asterisks in this? If so, that's the problem. From general-return-1786-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 17:32:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92645 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 17:32:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 17:32:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 66793 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 17:32:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66732 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 17:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66724 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 17:32:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:32:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0AB11DBAF0 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:00:11 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDPsIPPj2cYa for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:00:08 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5DB11DBAEF for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:00:08 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C360B76.8080405@verchaska.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:01:34 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jni files References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070600040301020308000600" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070600040301020308000600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, No there is no asterisks sign there, it came as i tried to make this *bold*. Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. On 07/08/2010 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: > >> DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >> /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); > Do you actually have asterisks in this? If so, that's the problem. > > --------------070600040301020308000600-- From general-return-1787-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 08 19:03:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28338 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 19:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 19:03:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 85719 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 19:03:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85657 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 19:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85498 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 19:03:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:03:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [87.248.114.170] (HELO web24106.mail.ird.yahoo.com) (87.248.114.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:03:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 44981 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2010 19:02:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278615723; bh=z83Oxm9MprZyaOvFUhpRV7AP9Tk01q95wQchRfY7x3Q=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kmOg3duvsNGhmd47jjrVCVunmsywueCg2GC7f0Fe/bhknSI5uIOqWoQ1LVy/YJGAx76CdetEdawElpADFBnHVIBBxvE+QLCf+4paKNpdOEeh8q5A+cqxqQHtbvJlcu3319eb28sNTzZOqwAQZ+PoSn2z0Ahw6cYpaz7rQ0jZs9Y= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3jHN0wjPWoUAKOlaaq4DCMVfGfj5fswk9fpvXuarZXGv2f8Y0yBJDQS4iy08vkAT0QzaMTrL5v4x2A4aluazPq3pKtA6U0Y/12OsgsBNjiH42PJu4bngpTAekoMY50IejVsLKx1bvL0PStN9in5v9ueRsSIleKHnp5Cw5zIhDAc=; Message-ID: <863416.44787.qm@web24106.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: W6hwyTwVM1nmPRJIkFjrO0UkI39zkZekdYi1TBL.GBoXC4O Af90sOji3W4VXaDQkDk7mcXqNfSHvARq.op0yMAJy6v_RD.1ytWJemkw6FR3 _d1cDwFgdKf3HdpaoM5H1tJLaicpy.pRn.aIKtYhPk3kKV86dP0yWBWA.3Yr LJ_tWQu3keM3IGiA.X1G2mQ1glJOpw8gk5qy_c_L9L5yH7QB8.eIzqpHBBxb Oy71PzLy0yQ-- Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web24106.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:02:03 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:02:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Denim Live Subject: Distributed Cache file issue To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-252320042-1278615723=:44787" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-252320042-1278615723=:44787 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello all, As a new user of hadoop, I am having some problems with understanding some things. I am writing a program to load a file to the distributed cache and read this file in each mapper. In my driver program, I have added the file to my distributed cache using: Path p=new Path("hdfs://localhost:9100/user/denimLive/denim/DCache/Orders.txt"); DistributedCache.addCacheFile(p.toUri(), conf); In the configure method of the mapper, I am reading the file from cache using: Path[] cacheFiles=DistributedCache.getFileClassPaths(conf); BufferedReader joinReader=new BufferedReader(new FileReader(cacheFiles[0].toString())); however, the cacheFiles variable has null value in it. There is something mentioned on the Yahoo tutorial for hadoop about distributed cache which I do not understand: As a cautionary note: If you use the local JobRunner in Hadoop (i.e., what happens if you call JobClient.runJob()in a program with no or an empty hadoop-conf.xmlaccessible), then no local data directory is created; the getLocalCacheFiles()call will return an empty set of results. Unit test code should take this into account." what does this mean? I am executing my program in pseudo-distributed mode on windows using Eclipse. Any suggestion in this regard is highly valued. Thanks in advance. --0-252320042-1278615723=:44787-- From general-return-1788-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 08:35:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68672 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 08:35:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 08:35:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 77781 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 08:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77364 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 08:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77355 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 08:35:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:35:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:35:21 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so1417626pxi.35 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B8euoDIRmfHxMrhxC5JhCwKlWXGcCYRDqcdwmsottHw=; b=NF2kdGOynpG8GuBb/SRRh+Na+2UdQMpKS3KNOwq/NJFSG3/XaZ8bAH8YWqHakCyUwa LDMX0+kWU14QvjtirNb49gE1h6nHl18qPHrmGARZbO40yeksJ8SkNOUy7aK90XOXEDSI p0Tx9guKzj8QhXA4L/eg/oFstkGr8Memacio4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KZGt2zxDdI4GNzubmUOO3zVZpqRKqYu6S14NldNOKdIfWzCy2YStB/JiVBsRGaLfdO 9R4vif4LbnOc6nyzlcQVwjvmz/XPicQf9qpPb4Vs0hcYNGQa7f4YJVucBH7/CbmqMs5K bus77D5ejmk4qDPr9R06IO/AiH1a14emNUgh4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr8604574wfd.41.1278664499918; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:04:59 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jni files From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? Thanks hemanth On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: > >> =A0 =A0 DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >> =A0 =A0 /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); > > Do you actually have asterisks in this? =A0If so, that's the problem. > > From general-return-1789-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 09:10:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81054 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 09:10:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 09:10:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 41378 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:10:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41009 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:10:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41001 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 09:10:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:10:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F5511DBAF8 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:39 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-2aGEBpyd7R for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:35 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E2211DBAF3 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:37:35 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:39:04 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jni files References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Hemant, The version are same as copied it to all client machine. I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learned that I need to copy jni files to HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-xxx-xxx. I though my linux machine is Linux-i386-32. then I found in "org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName" class gives you your machine type and its Linux-amd64-64 and asa I copied jni files to this directory error are not coming. Though full code is still not running as I developed the application using java.file class and i am still thinking how to make changes so that it can access hdfs !!! Do i need to change my all API with respect to HDFS and rewrite using hadoop fs or ??!!! It will be great if someone advice on this. Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. On 07/09/2010 02:04 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Hi, > > Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the > versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? > > Thanks > hemanth > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: >> >>> DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >>> /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); >> Do you actually have asterisks in this? If so, that's the problem. >> >> From general-return-1790-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 09:18:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82627 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 09:18:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 09:18:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 50255 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:18:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49961 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49953 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 09:18:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:18:38 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so1455434pvc.35 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:17:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4QbP/Uuko7zzTV4hPAJXYR4Jfn/gSx1Aiu4QEob5dSw=; b=XFWxqPi+qvBVWL9qre2pffb7ukGxmbH5GJ3WAHe3KvvqzmDshxhyf1s5eSMH2MJ27B 9cWMxcHMS9N9bXxc0jaVoQaSNW4WH86alkmKSgmVJGFhaFfMvm9a7Pf8HOjwyB+l8qvS kRZ0n8Opye5Dl1N81s5Mtmpd+FpzwtB9z5IZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mTKK5SEIPQnriTpx8oXrJpvfDnCYfUqGoAp3IMXnx2Uie1GdE7BnCHVKNLBV3iotUS ZnxKwWYZ6b3UgaY3V/lNPGJLpN7AMYxkeM4sARjL14soEAe/8vKFEKtPyVzbY8BqDGrT Vk0BuxyUHveSr5i/S+u991O36jgr1/fu1huUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.174.4 with SMTP id w4mr4257090wfe.160.1278667037172; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:17:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:47:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jni files From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Amit, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, amit kumar verma wro= te: > =A0Hi Hemant, > > The version are same as copied it to all client machine. > > I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learned > that I need to copy jni files to > HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-xxx-xxx. I though my linux mach= ine > is Linux-i386-32. then I found in "org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName" > class gives you your machine type and its Linux-amd64-64 and asa I copied > jni files to this directory error are not coming. > > Though full code is still not running as I developed the application usin= g > java.file class and i am still thinking how to make changes so that it ca= n > access hdfs !!! =A0Do i need to change my all API with respect to HDFS an= d > rewrite using hadoop fs or ??!!! > To access files from HDFS, you should use the Hadoop FileSystem API. Please take a look at the Javadoc and also a tutorial such as this: http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html#programmatically for more information. > It will be great if someone advice on this. > > > > Thanks, > Amit Kumar Verma > Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. > > > > On 07/09/2010 02:04 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the >> versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? >> >> Thanks >> hemanth >> >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: >>> >>>> =A0 =A0 DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >>>> =A0 =A0 /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); >>> >>> Do you actually have asterisks in this? =A0If so, that's the problem. >>> >>> > From general-return-1791-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 09:31:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84845 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 09:31:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 09:31:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 60858 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:31:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60566 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60558 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 09:31:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:31:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:31:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550C511DBAFB for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:59:06 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTJnMCrNZ61C for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:59:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AD611DBAEF for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:59:03 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C36EC38.1080703@verchaska.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:00:32 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jni files References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Hemanth, Yeah I have gone through the api documentation and there is no issue in accessing files from HDFS, but my concern is what about the API which already got developed without hadoop. OK, what I mean, I developed an application when I didn't know about the hadoop, but as now I need to implement grid environment so I am looking for Hadoop. So no the question is, how can use the same code to work for HDFS, do I need to change my code and use hadoop API to used the HDFS. If that is the case then the change will be major, or there is any way where the default java.file can be integrated with hdfs. Did you get the issue ?? Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. On 07/09/2010 02:47 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Amit, > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, amit kumar verma wrote: >> Hi Hemant, >> >> The version are same as copied it to all client machine. >> >> I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learned >> that I need to copy jni files to >> HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-xxx-xxx. I though my linux machine >> is Linux-i386-32. then I found in "org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName" >> class gives you your machine type and its Linux-amd64-64 and asa I copied >> jni files to this directory error are not coming. >> >> Though full code is still not running as I developed the application using >> java.file class and i am still thinking how to make changes so that it can >> access hdfs !!! Do i need to change my all API with respect to HDFS and >> rewrite using hadoop fs or ??!!! >> > To access files from HDFS, you should use the Hadoop FileSystem API. > Please take a look at the Javadoc and also a tutorial such as this: > http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html#programmatically > for more information. > >> It will be great if someone advice on this. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Amit Kumar Verma >> Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. >> >> >> >> On 07/09/2010 02:04 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the >>> versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> hemanth >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer >>> wrote: >>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: >>>> >>>>> DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >>>>> /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); >>>> Do you actually have asterisks in this? If so, that's the problem. >>>> >>>> From general-return-1792-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 09:49:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87896 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 09:49:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 09:49:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 86718 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86503 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 09:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86495 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 09:49:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:49:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:49:28 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so1477724pvc.35 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DqNzTZmLukh6MmPodiJLmbputc7gftQZO3lSTvvYpOw=; b=L9+Tl3VNFiZjOH3Qdd8Mb06m3eztFifFHBrmDYVtxhZo0F34Qj+Ka/wCMpIdqnuhI4 jlGJRczU5aP3AaBFOgFymW8nBqpyfUW23ZRqnFrs6HXvvy0076L4aLueSPHEhfVsSYo4 h7ZfXaigVd+EcHC6/MADKJX5CEkftTpK+8/iw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AMPaRGaMaAiH5uKhvjxhKrJ/ZAjPqHFnxJGcHoMddbw00iveeRyXaO18ty8kG7kEBQ v4Vk1/zYnIfAuP3kunioKqizW0VjTHfI9/PEys3gZbrt2lBOnaY5FACnjOrxEalElvcW v8dxKX+9ecRTLglCpdIMUF2FKQ876TxcnAhsw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.136.1 with SMTP id j1mr11245492wfd.181.1278668887270; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:48:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C36EC38.1080703@verchaska.com> References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> <4C36EC38.1080703@verchaska.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:18:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jni files From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Amit, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:00 PM, amit kumar verma wro= te: > =A0Hi =A0Hemanth, > > Yeah I have gone through the api documentation and there is no issue in > accessing files from HDFS, but my concern is what about the API which > already got developed without hadoop. OK, what I mean, I developed an > application when I didn't know about the hadoop, but as now I need to > implement grid environment so I am looking for Hadoop. > > So no the question is, how can use the same code to work for HDFS, do I n= eed > to change my code and use hadoop API to used the HDFS. If that is the cas= e > then the change will be major, or there is any way where the default > java.file can be integrated with hdfs. > > Did you get the issue ?? > Yes, I think I do. Unfortunately, AFAIK, there's no easy way out. If your application had previously used Java I/O File APIs, they need to be migrated to the Hadoop FS API. If you are moving from a non-Distributed application to Hadoop for a reason (such as handling scale for e.g.) the investment will be well worth the effort, IMHO. > Thanks, > Amit Kumar Verma > Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. > > > > On 07/09/2010 02:47 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >> >> Amit, >> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, amit kumar verma >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> =A0Hi Hemant, >>> >>> The version are same as copied it to all client machine. >>> >>> I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learne= d >>> that I need to copy jni files to >>> HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-xxx-xxx. I though my linux >>> machine >>> is Linux-i386-32. then I found in "org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName" >>> class gives you your machine type and its Linux-amd64-64 and asa I copi= ed >>> jni files to this directory error are not coming. >>> >>> Though full code is still not running as I developed the application >>> using >>> java.file class and i am still thinking how to make changes so that it >>> can >>> access hdfs !!! =A0Do i need to change my all API with respect to HDFS = and >>> rewrite using hadoop fs or ??!!! >>> >> To access files from HDFS, you should use the Hadoop FileSystem API. >> Please take a look at the Javadoc and also a tutorial such as this: >> http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html#programmatically >> for more information. >> >>> It will be great if someone advice on this. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Amit Kumar Verma >>> Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 07/09/2010 02:04 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the >>>> versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> hemanth >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer >>>> =A0 =A0wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >>>>>> =A0 =A0 /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); >>>>> >>>>> Do you actually have asterisks in this? =A0If so, that's the problem. >>>>> >>>>> > From general-return-1793-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 10:23:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12277 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 10:23:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 10:23:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 24611 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 10:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24182 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 10:23:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24174 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 10:23:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:23:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6636411DBAF3 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:51:24 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHQQO6Kkkucm for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:51:18 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9211DB886 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:51:18 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C36F877.50302@verchaska.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:52:47 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: jni files References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> <4C36EC38.1080703@verchaska.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Hemanth, Thanks for your kind response and support. But what if I am using third party API and it also uses the java IO File ?? I think there must be some way to use hdfs by default with changing the code !! Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. On 07/09/2010 03:18 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Amit, > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:00 PM, amit kumar verma wrote: >> Hi Hemanth, >> >> Yeah I have gone through the api documentation and there is no issue in >> accessing files from HDFS, but my concern is what about the API which >> already got developed without hadoop. OK, what I mean, I developed an >> application when I didn't know about the hadoop, but as now I need to >> implement grid environment so I am looking for Hadoop. >> >> So no the question is, how can use the same code to work for HDFS, do I need >> to change my code and use hadoop API to used the HDFS. If that is the case >> then the change will be major, or there is any way where the default >> java.file can be integrated with hdfs. >> >> Did you get the issue ?? >> > Yes, I think I do. Unfortunately, AFAIK, there's no easy way out. If > your application had previously used Java I/O File APIs, they need to > be migrated to the Hadoop FS API. If you are moving from a > non-Distributed application to Hadoop for a reason (such as handling > scale for e.g.) the investment will be well worth the effort, IMHO. > >> Thanks, >> Amit Kumar Verma >> Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. >> >> >> >> On 07/09/2010 02:47 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >>> Amit, >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, amit kumar verma >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Hemant, >>>> >>>> The version are same as copied it to all client machine. >>>> >>>> I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learned >>>> that I need to copy jni files to >>>> HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-xxx-xxx. I though my linux >>>> machine >>>> is Linux-i386-32. then I found in "org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName" >>>> class gives you your machine type and its Linux-amd64-64 and asa I copied >>>> jni files to this directory error are not coming. >>>> >>>> Though full code is still not running as I developed the application >>>> using >>>> java.file class and i am still thinking how to make changes so that it >>>> can >>>> access hdfs !!! Do i need to change my all API with respect to HDFS and >>>> rewrite using hadoop fs or ??!!! >>>> >>> To access files from HDFS, you should use the Hadoop FileSystem API. >>> Please take a look at the Javadoc and also a tutorial such as this: >>> http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html#programmatically >>> for more information. >>> >>>> It will be great if someone advice on this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amit Kumar Verma >>>> Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/09/2010 02:04 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Possibly another silly question, but can you cross check if the >>>>> versions of Hadoop on the client and the server are the same ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> hemanth >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Allen Wittenauer >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:08 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> DistributedCache.addCacheFile("hdfs://* >>>>>>> /192.168.0.153:50075*/libraries/mylib.so.1#mylib.so", conf); >>>>>> Do you actually have asterisks in this? If so, that's the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> From general-return-1794-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 15:06:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12729 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 15:06:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 15:06:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 85614 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 15:06:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85494 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 15:05:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85485 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 15:05:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:05:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdixon@omniti.com designates 8.8.38.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [8.8.38.6] (HELO edge.omniti.com) (8.8.38.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:05:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=omniti.com; s=s1024; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@omniti.com; t=1278687913; h=From:Subject:Date:To; bh=4JESy4pcnlNxRWe0D3mXe8goYSw6mgxQuRTfP0+6sWM=; b=QiBhR3Y9tFugxAZonjtcYYJ6E0X0hKBmdErYd9uCvUcXZlNQ/gTJupnUkSnUahJq 6Xlvwc8HpVw9PiY7hTxyE8KEK7nW1W+wIVsq8D405BWQtMu4/IilusPmicSHHjbH K77Dzxov7R8Bj6AqlkatwePa1QUywrXE7ABQH+xIORA=; Authentication-Results: edge smtp.user=jdixon@omniti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [68.55.0.29] ([68.55.0.29:63216] helo=omniti.com) by edge (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.35 r(26636M)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 4D/1C-17327-8AA373C4; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:05:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:05:09 -0400 From: Jason Dixon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Last day to submit your Surge 2010 CFP! Message-ID: <20100709150509.GM4133@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Today is your last chance to submit a CFP abstract for the 2010 Surge Scalability Conference. The event is taking place on Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Surge focuses on case studies that address production failures and the re-engineering efforts that led to victory in Web Applications or Internet Architectures. You can find more information, including suggested topics and our current list of speakers, online: http://omniti.com/surge/2010 The final lineup should be available on the conference website next week. If you have questions about the CFP, attending Surge, or having your business sponsor/exhibit at Surge 2010, please contact us at surge@omniti.com. Thanks! -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdixon@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 From general-return-1795-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 17:16:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49185 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 17:16:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 17:16:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63433 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 17:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63072 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 17:16:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63042 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 17:16:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:16:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shujamughal@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:16:17 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so1821727pvc.35 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=22+XsjgGQjF7uP0/NmrpSXLnSwQj1Sw7zuaDai3KEJ4=; b=PlTNVNpArLTbydCiUXW4OUaiI4yUnTKiYMTq6jPHtG6XdEllq3KB2z6s0CM+0iyxYN 0MxCvcKswG7TuLrFEwHCRbSt2rMxTg8XS5n6+vrJbeDe27OqRcjUauMIn4luJvxoZOKh XYpqNYijNz95J4bM47xNwgu9s+lLU4wCS6IF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Dc2bUOWZI0shj+vsX2BpJm17qx3spFwguH0oqhjBS20408b882xQBe7cVLqhx9TYVF jz6X/0GhILveBSefYQWdzOXXm+y7NO3Jt+YFg6CLiyiootFRwnsEsiM6oDcTCOB93qUS nzxHOqNb5WcBcAxZi2iCp52Tvp5RFsEyQGoQA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.192.4 with SMTP id p4mr1483185wff.285.1278695695285; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.19.15 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:14:55 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space From: Shuja Rehman To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd28c90b1a0d2048af78a6a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd28c90b1a0d2048af78a6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All I am facing a hard problem. I am running a map reduce job using streaming but it fails and it gives the following error. Caught: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at Nodemapper5.parseXML(Nodemapper5.groovy:25) java.lang.RuntimeException: PipeMapRed.waitOutputThreads(): subprocess failed with code 1 at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRed.waitOutputThreads(PipeMapRed.java:362) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRed.mapRedFinished(PipeMapRed.java:572) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapper.close(PipeMapper.java:136) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:57) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:36) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:358) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:307) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) I have increased the heap size in hadoop-env.sh and make it 2000M. Also I tell the job manually by following line. -D mapred.child.java.opts=-Xmx2000M \ but it still gives the error. The same job runs fine if i run on shell using 1024M heap size like cat file.xml | /root/Nodemapper5.groovy Any clue????????? Thanks in advance. -- Regards Shuja-ur-Rehman Baig _________________________________ MS CS - School of Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) Sector U, DHA, Lahore, 54792, Pakistan Cell: +92 3214207445 --000e0cd28c90b1a0d2048af78a6a-- From general-return-1796-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 17:39:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53291 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 17:39:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 17:39:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 92691 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 17:39:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92533 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 17:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41807 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 17:08:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org From: Grant Ingersoll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Triangle (Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill) Area Hadoop Users Group First Meeting: July 20th Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:07:58 -0400 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@mahout.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Interested in learning more about Hadoop or finding out what=92s going = on with Hadoop in the Triangle? Come out for the first meeting of the Triangle Hadoop Users Group = scheduled for 7pm on Tuesday July 20th at Bronto Software. Find out more at http://www.trihug.org Three presenters are lined up: =95 Intro To Hadoop - Jeff Turner =95 Setting up Your First Cluster - Chad Vawter =95 Processing Megadata With Hadoop and Python - Ryan Cox Join the mailing list and follow us @trihug. Cheers, Grant= From general-return-1797-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 18:24:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73104 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 18:24:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 18:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 38558 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 18:24:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38467 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 18:24:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38453 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 18:24:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:24:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:24:26 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Iv3qWzrJjuSUS3D4kvmumDcqU5jGTHBqA9mSfTO0de+TSOz5J6FIrP1C sCacNYVbNiRWiP4etn258Hthzn9iK21oj0jG6I+YjN/CbNTzLs6qUTc+v HuZVzUKDNuKbJh3; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1278699866; x=1310235866; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20jni=20files|Date:=20Fri,=209=20Jul=2020 10=2018:24:04=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201 .0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<4490e8c1-f16b-4913-99a4-781637033c25> |In-Reply-To:=20<4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> |References:=20<4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com>=0D=0A=09< 354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com>=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20<4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com>; bh=rwYSR7OBzn2iWNc87REMWv2TAkybnSeUyz9WyaRoIt4=; b=FtX2JZgnG/zY6R0kXEToVu4by69YMYcW0jCGQwGT5JfDJ7AubUfQV5nX G/pnqxjlFlpxCmGWaoO2Su8/11+aZYdnOBOXdkcJCJQrm9QXl56sMHLl6 PDzIHF19ZEVqwBr; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,174,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="13524905" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:24:05 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: jni files Thread-Topic: jni files Thread-Index: AQHLHnTVV1c7eHpkqEaCeEw37pEITJKnvfoAgAD9sICAAAmGAIAAmxEA Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:24:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4C35877A.3090705@verchaska.com> <354823AA-8AF3-4FF4-9606-EAAD236E1835@linkedin.com> <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> In-Reply-To: <4C36E730.1060004@verchaska.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4490e8c1-f16b-4913-99a4-781637033c25> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 9, 2010, at 2:09 AM, amit kumar verma wrote: > I think I got a solution. As I read more about hadoop and JNI, I learned = that I need to copy jni files to HADOOP_INSTALLATION_DIR//lib/native/Linux-= xxx-xxx. lib/native/xxx are for the native compression libraries. They are not for = user-level map reduce code. From general-return-1798-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 09 19:20:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87904 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2010 19:20:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jul 2010 19:20:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 1407 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 19:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1188 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2010 19:20:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1179 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2010 19:20:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:20:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhishek.vit@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:20:02 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so2297754gxk.35 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:19:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AOxILQjtp34pVxMoFjhuYtUdRkzfBFzDorql0lqODPg=; b=lhADrtcB4Lgk0ad43X/NO/UIJy0avLPIAoBdsoxyk7/T/y9oTRYhyUNlcu8dGNFqlu Ptta4wiglykc1ICWhSfPUk4t4nD4bG38EBn/uQFbwYtO+XhEmXPlvHXggFtOLIL4pJfF V9d0h+LM4YOGCjLm1wgAVFC3ozHypKK7wqdVY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Q08Dz8Fe5mH7NPhriLt1CakYtBC8beFppNETMcvzZ9D4UwV15GxfZER1khD052yAp8 fleWNbU79sGQL8pXcpDYfuWttHJcfO7l86dbVpWQGGn6SSHyXc6ynylYkD7fAGlXJtyz OScz4knsw0suDi4BRJZixjtZagSY/XUwUOwrc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.65.147 with SMTP id j19mr5852758qai.189.1278703180915; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.246.131 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:19:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Triangle (Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill) Area Hadoop Users Group First Meeting: July 20th From: Abhishek Pratap To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: user@mahout.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88cf8cdf2d4c048af9488e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f88cf8cdf2d4c048af9488e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Grant The agenda for this meeting looks really interesting for newbies like me. Any chance you guys can record videos. I am assuming getting talks live on air will be tougher. Thanks! -Abhi On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote= : > Interested in learning more about Hadoop or finding out what=92s going on > with Hadoop in the Triangle? > > Come out for the first meeting of the Triangle Hadoop Users Group schedul= ed > for 7pm on Tuesday July 20th at Bronto Software. > > Find out more at http://www.trihug.org > > Three presenters are lined up: > > =95 Intro To Hadoop - Jeff Turner > =95 Setting up Your First Cluster - Chad Vawter > =95 Processing Megadata With Hadoop and Python - Ryan Cox > Join the mailing list and follow us @trihug. > > > Cheers, > Grant --00c09f88cf8cdf2d4c048af9488e-- From general-return-1799-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 12 12:15:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7805 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2010 12:15:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Jul 2010 12:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 61705 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 12:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61162 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 12:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61154 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2010 12:15:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:15:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jamesisaac.dell@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:15:40 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so6798036iwn.35 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RAWiycnJHcMRg3mCETd9DyaCA/Bs/0CXvhl308MAZFg=; b=TilLH2grhUyoj48jRs/DhHjxeOwFq8Kx1aJfFbN1+j4GdJ2R+qD9tr3699vg4G3OMA 0T4X1A2/i/5lRoj/hNC+sYwAzITGrCQM0scczTw/bA3n8neOIeE19Ct52+T9UQDI275q mfDSJhdRE0ZH/56Tcstvpu5NzjTeHjXow+8Xg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uhqq9VdHZjDlQWZb5T6nZoQp6QWNjycxK3y7PZCPFVsmEA3JG54n+IaTdbYg7AocSi WynrqKekLO4AyIrIafWYEIUG6iYdZpR/3FagRRroacIM+cQoCb6Ow4H4wyvNBU0ZVhNZ E3Q+N1esTEO3qf4OprI+uHXIr4Gm0yYfUzaOE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.80 with SMTP id q16mr13160885ibx.142.1278936918897; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.143.72 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:45:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException in Hadoop From: james isaac To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045013e15bdb33a048b2fb426 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --005045013e15bdb33a048b2fb426 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have just started my career with Hadoop. I tried to execute the example given in http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/mapred_tutorial.htmla= s explained in the tutorial. I was not able to execute the program as described in the tutorial. I am getting the error as shown below. I tried executing with some other examples. They are also showing the same =93ClassNotFoundException=94. I tried to find the solution in various websi= tes but i could not find it. Please help me to find the problem. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.myorg.WordCount at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:149) --005045013e15bdb33a048b2fb426-- From general-return-1800-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 12 15:46:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92824 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2010 15:46:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Jul 2010 15:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 74472 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 15:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74410 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 15:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74397 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2010 15:46:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:46:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:46:14 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so5794471qyk.14 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m3VpwpW8VhKjd+VSsUOM6GFRcz1402v1aA12L70Mttg=; b=nBoo9S2/x72BtuUMHiqlqAlPuI781+DIy5B1vNvJYeFYZOCX8QpV/+tqlD2fY7/BcG sVLEwTzjKqhRy/q75iUEq63EsdKnhw+H6kRT/ZAUpB8krHnXtxJb1oiiH2GyIgylANnk 1kmhLddc8r9eTBtLnQ7dLGR8iUa0tUTIh+4qQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vcfD3zRf2kt/DmIdHbKgclEhDfZhsqTumPgCyxmZzrqGR9C8OilbTqw84GjdZSqfsi 2nxtR920HZpX2vWCLMWLUXdmzKUvxO17gIDD8hokAWNdxUD/sVEBbE2OqT/rcTh0NXPD 289dS2TnZo9YCB0+odftXyZeBSP0bbDLOqQjc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.64.209 with SMTP id f17mr7901804qai.138.1278949493646; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:44:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException in Hadoop From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f8cdd2412827048b32a2f3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f8cdd2412827048b32a2f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please give the commandline you used. You should have specified the jar containing WordCount class. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:15 AM, james isaac wro= te: > Hi, > > I have just started my career with Hadoop. I tried to execute the example > given in > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/mapred_tutorial.htmlas > explained in the tutorial. I was not able to execute the program as > described in the tutorial. I am getting the error as shown below. I tried > executing with some other examples. They are also showing the same > =93ClassNotFoundException=94. I tried to find the solution in various web= sites > but i could not find it. Please help me to find the problem. > > Exception in thread "main" > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.myorg.WordCount > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:149) > --001485f8cdd2412827048b32a2f3-- From general-return-1801-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 12 19:40:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6181 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2010 19:40:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Jul 2010 19:40:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 3154 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 19:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2966 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2010 19:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2954 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2010 19:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:40:08 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so4138229pvc.35 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:39:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.163.15 with SMTP id l15mr17598716wfe.97.1278963585988; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.18.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:39:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A while back we started discussing on list (http://bit.ly/aFj9Ya) and at the contributors meeting (http://bit.ly/aj4Y7I) a more coordinated way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to Hadoop. Thanks for all the feedback. Most of it was encouraging so I wrote up a draft proposal with specifics to discuss here. After incorporating feedback I'll send out another revision for vote. Thanks, Eli HEP: 1 Title: HEP Purpose and Guidelines Author: Eli Collins Status: Draft What is a HEP? ============== HEP stands for Hadoop Enhancement Proposal, and is based on Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A HEP is a document that describes a new feature, it's rationale, and issues the feature needs to address in order to be successuflly incorporated. The intent is for HEPs to be the primary mechanism for proposing significant new features to core Hadoop (common, HDFS and MapReduce), incorporating community feedback, and recording the proposal. Going through the HEP process should improve the chances that a proposal is successful. While HEPs do not need to come with code, they are a mechanism to propose features to the community, with the intent of contributing the feature, rather than request the community implement a feature. HEPs must be consistent with Apache bylaws [2], for example, the HEP workflow takes place on the public Apache Hadoop lists. When is a HEP Required? ======================= HEPs should not impede casual contribution to Hadoop. Small improvements and bugs do not require HEPs. Not all features need HEPs. While the decision is subjective, here are some guidelines to indicate a HEP should be considered: - The feature impacts backwards compatibility (eg modifies released public APIs in an incompatible way). - The feature requires that an existing component be substantially re-designed (eg NameNode modified to use Bookkeeper). - The implementation impact multiple parts of the system (eg symbolic links versus adding a pluggable component like a codec). - The feature impacts the entire development community (eg converts the build system to use maven). HEP Workflow ============ The author of a HEP should first try to determine if their idea is HEP-able by sending mail to the general, or the project-specific lists if the scope of the idea is limited to the project. This gives the author a chance to flesh out the proposal, address intial concerns, and figure out whether it has a chance of being accepted. The author's role is to build consensus, and gather dissenting opinions. Following this discussion the author should draft a HEP proposal following the HEP template. The proposal should accurately reflect and address feedback and dissenting opinions. For example, flesh out sections on backwards compatibility or testing. The author should send the draft of the proposal to hep@hadoop.apache.org for review. This is a new, public list for editors and those interested in following the review process. A set of editors reviews incoming HEPs. Each HEP is assigned a single primary editor. An editor may volunteer if they feel particular functional expertise is required or assign HEPs to editors round robin. The editor reviews the proposal and may request it be updated if it does not sufficiently address feedback raised during discussion, eg why the proposal is not redundant with existing functionality, or is technically sound, sufficiently motivated, covers backwards compatibility, etc. As updates are necessary, the HEP author can check in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new HEP versions to the editor for committing. In order to ensure HEP proposals make progress the editor should respond to proposal drafts within two weeks of receiving them (or the proposer can request another editor), and the proposer should generate updates to the draft within two weeks of receiving feedback from the editor. The editor's role is to determine if the proposal is complete, so that the proposal can be voted on, not whether they agree with the proposal itself. The editor's involvement should increase the chance that a HEP proposal makes it to a vote. Once the editor deems the proposal is complete they add it to a versioned HEP repository and the author posts the proposal to general@hadoop.apache.org for vote. HEP votes, like Apache procedural votes, use majority rule [3]. Successful HEPs are assigned a number, unsuccessful HEPs remain drafts. The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects. HEP Contents ============ Each HEP should contain the following: 1. Preamble -- Including the HEP number, a short descriptive title, and the names of the authors. 2. Abstract -- A short (~200 word) description of the technical issue being addressed. 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). 4. Design -- A high-level explanation of the design. It should cover intended use cases, failure scenarios, and impact on the existing system. 5. Motivation -- The motivation spells out the use case for the feature and the benefits it provides. 6. Rationale -- The rationale describes what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the feature is designed in other systems. It should also consider whether the feature could be achieved by layering atop the existing system rather than modifying it. The rationale should provide evidence of consensus within the community and discuss important objections or concerns raised during discussion. 7. Backwards Compatibility -- All HEPs that introduce backwards incompatibilities must include a section describing these incompatibilities and their severity. The HEP must explain how the author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. HEP submissions without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be rejected outright. HEP Template ============ HEPs should be plain text with minimal structural markup that adheres to a rigid style. You can use this HEP as an example. Each HEP starts with a header that contains the HEP number (or empty if the number has not yet been assigned), title, list of authors and status (Draft, Accepted, Rejected, or Withdrawn). Auxiliary Files =============== HEPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. Such files must be named ``hep-XXXX-Y.ext``, where "XXXX" is the HEP number, "Y" is a serial number (starting at 1), and "ext" is replaced by the actual file extension (e.g. "png"). References ========== 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 2. http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html 3. http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Copyright ========= This document has been placed in the public domain. From general-return-1802-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 13 05:46:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87638 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2010 05:46:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Jul 2010 05:46:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 71354 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 05:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71050 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 05:46:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80293 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2010 03:08:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of greensight@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c0UOYEr5EOX7KXPL1bCJ3QoVLRNLiFvRdmVLwEnCe7A=; b=S0eCRdNU8e4oaNZsbaJSizf8DWjCRYhFa6zhGPscmdOlbfYD3x8J+qMVZOJsuv4yCp nAbNZbtRe6e88AhPavRILasBsBEg2DyIbja7Z+vnLjy80tq7Z+diHs5nU+r+W5WoThF7 wV2X/qvsBirn3xmhOEnuGo12kLCrOQcP9gsKU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GCpzYBXciAn8aHPlAHNJ9jlwlwnquq2LvwP2syadtiYvSn1uxzrpkcs8zxRL8ixbzJ S+kFmS60chImiy0gzoIKg8+GT1r6oXTbwcOLJvgsZ5+aNxKcOMdQTRhUn+8QWAe8SGWW 65Szmt0xEpmZrZhbB3mjaXR179fG2//WT9Qqo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:08:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Invite a keynote talk on Hadoop in the coming Apache Aisa Roadshow in Shanghai (August 14-15) From: Jack Cai To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6441ec8d5b9c6048b3c2de2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6441ec8d5b9c6048b3c2de2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There will be an Apache Asia Roadshow event on August 14 - 15 in Shanghai, China. As Hadoop is a very hot topic in China, we would like to invite a keynote talk on Hadoop in the event. The event could cover $2-3K travel cost for the speaker. Visit here [1] for more information on the event. If someone is interested in delivering the keynote, please drop me a note. Thanks! -Jack [1] http://www.apachecon.com/2010/Asia/cfp --0016e6441ec8d5b9c6048b3c2de2-- From general-return-1803-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 13 06:00:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89385 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2010 06:00:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Jul 2010 06:00:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 78852 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 06:00:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78572 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 06:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78563 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2010 06:00:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:00:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jamesisaac.dell@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:59:58 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so8177315iwn.35 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:59:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aSbNwCWY7MyKUgj9+fy5f+0FnWCuePGc45mCOBK7i7M=; b=WB55hd9EA/Ms4+dRugWiAEE0oGWApjf9QBhRe5F9FUwtIRAmccXDzMUYWhJRYFTg70 RKUzgSLU9REnNMGQeo9ecBPeGk5nzwpa3gj9nrzO8OZsVqBnpyw6p+G1urtZnRH66mZ5 VC+2v1//zk/3ICwVleUL1Mut9ca93P8MfRKzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZCzynUJgswP9RPzh3WXL7zFvDkgN4B3yDcn2gyJ1Km65PwJZYos+D2f5NPofZu2/Ds HlmKAbFfCSejoeV2DVBt4oV6X5pfnL3xjQD+agSjATmByO1takEahuqJ6WHfySyd2G48 6obfO8afpcUZQkFD3dbXacxB9aLBxXhGJlOFE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.184.168 with SMTP id ck40mr14738882ibb.174.1279000774469; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.143.72 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:59:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:29:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException in Hadoop From: james isaac To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045016033d472d4048b3e9245 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --005045016033d472d4048b3e9245 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the command i used and prompt is pointing to the current directory where wordcount.jar resides. I have also set the path for the HADOOP_HOME and added the bin directory of hadoop to the classpath. current directory =3D /home/user/demo/wordcount HADOOP_HOME=3D/home/user/hadoop_sws/hadoop-0.20.2 $ hadoop jar wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount /hdfs/data/input /hdfs/data/output On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Please give the commandline you used. > You should have specified the jar containing WordCount class. > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:15 AM, james isaac >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have just started my career with Hadoop. I tried to execute the examp= le > > given in > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/mapred_tutorial.htmlas > > explained in the tutorial. I was not able to execute the program as > > described in the tutorial. I am getting the error as shown below. I tri= ed > > executing with some other examples. They are also showing the same > > =93ClassNotFoundException=94. I tried to find the solution in various > websites > > but i could not find it. Please help me to find the problem. > > > > Exception in thread "main" > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.myorg.WordCount > > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) > > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > > at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247) > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:149) > > > --005045016033d472d4048b3e9245-- From general-return-1804-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 13 20:55:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87550 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2010 20:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Jul 2010 20:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 92124 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 20:55:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91870 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 20:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91862 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2010 20:55:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:55:23 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o6DKsN4u094247 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:54:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=zReCAXrNRJY5ps0WMeqR1/8Be5aDQmKmFKRkxYF2jxqjOT+rV5Rc9RcJYVVOBjHZ Message-ID: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:54:23 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HEP proposal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli, Thanks for a really good proposal. Some questions / comments: On voting 1. Which voting rule? http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval I think you mean the MajorityApproval as it does not have veto rule. So may be it's just clarifying the reference. 2. Who can vote? Usually PMCs have Binding Votes. Would be good to have a sentence clarifying this. 3. How long does the vote go? Usual 3 days may not be enough. One week is reasonable? 4. Discussion on public lists. A HEP can evolve from a jira, then it should be counted as a public discussion. I think it makes sense even to continue the discussion there if so. I propose to add the following: ========================================= idea is HEP-able by sending mail to the general, or the project-specific lists + (including Jiras) if the scope of the idea is limited to the project. ========================================= 5. How the set of editors is selected? "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? 6. The level of design details. I think HEP should have a pretty detailed design. When people vote they will want to be sure the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. Should we say "implementation-ready design", rather than "A high-level explanation of the design." Or just "A _detailed_ explanation of the design." 7. Typos: successuflly, apointed, intial Thanks, --Konstantin On 7/12/2010 12:39 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > A while back we started discussing on list (http://bit.ly/aFj9Ya) and > at the contributors meeting (http://bit.ly/aj4Y7I) a more coordinated > way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to Hadoop. > Thanks for all the feedback. Most of it was encouraging so I wrote up > a draft proposal with specifics to discuss here. After incorporating > feedback I'll send out another revision for vote. > > Thanks, > Eli > > > HEP: 1 > Title: HEP Purpose and Guidelines > Author: Eli Collins > Status: Draft > > > What is a HEP? > ============== > > HEP stands for Hadoop Enhancement Proposal, and is based on Python's > PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A HEP is a document that > describes a new feature, it's rationale, and issues the feature needs > to address in order to be successuflly incorporated. > > The intent is for HEPs to be the primary mechanism for proposing > significant new features to core Hadoop (common, HDFS and MapReduce), > incorporating community feedback, and recording the proposal. Going > through the HEP process should improve the chances that a proposal is > successful. > > While HEPs do not need to come with code, they are a mechanism to > propose features to the community, with the intent of contributing the > feature, rather than request the community implement a feature. > > HEPs must be consistent with Apache bylaws [2], for example, the HEP > workflow takes place on the public Apache Hadoop lists. > > > When is a HEP Required? > ======================= > > HEPs should not impede casual contribution to Hadoop. Small > improvements and bugs do not require HEPs. Not all features need > HEPs. While the decision is subjective, here are some guidelines to > indicate a HEP should be considered: > > - The feature impacts backwards compatibility (eg modifies released > public APIs in an incompatible way). > > - The feature requires that an existing component be substantially > re-designed (eg NameNode modified to use Bookkeeper). > > - The implementation impact multiple parts of the system (eg symbolic > links versus adding a pluggable component like a codec). > > - The feature impacts the entire development community (eg converts > the build system to use maven). > > > HEP Workflow > ============ > > The author of a HEP should first try to determine if their idea is > HEP-able by sending mail to the general, or the project-specific lists > if the scope of the idea is limited to the project. This gives the > author a chance to flesh out the proposal, address intial concerns, > and figure out whether it has a chance of being accepted. The > author's role is to build consensus, and gather dissenting opinions. > > Following this discussion the author should draft a HEP proposal > following the HEP template. The proposal should accurately reflect and > address feedback and dissenting opinions. For example, flesh out > sections on backwards compatibility or testing. The author should send > the draft of the proposal to hep@hadoop.apache.org for review. This > is a new, public list for editors and those interested in following > the review process. > > A set of editors reviews incoming HEPs. Each HEP is assigned a single > primary editor. An editor may volunteer if they feel particular > functional expertise is required or assign HEPs to editors round > robin. > > The editor reviews the proposal and may request it be updated if it > does not sufficiently address feedback raised during discussion, eg > why the proposal is not redundant with existing functionality, or is > technically sound, sufficiently motivated, covers backwards > compatibility, etc. As updates are necessary, the HEP author can check > in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new HEP > versions to the editor for committing. In order to ensure HEP > proposals make progress the editor should respond to proposal drafts > within two weeks of receiving them (or the proposer can request > another editor), and the proposer should generate updates to the draft > within two weeks of receiving feedback from the editor. > > The editor's role is to determine if the proposal is complete, so that > the proposal can be voted on, not whether they agree with the proposal > itself. The editor's involvement should increase the chance that a > HEP proposal makes it to a vote. > > Once the editor deems the proposal is complete they add it to a > versioned HEP repository and the author posts the proposal to > general@hadoop.apache.org for vote. HEP votes, like Apache procedural > votes, use majority rule [3]. Successful HEPs are assigned a number, > unsuccessful HEPs remain drafts. > > The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to > how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects. > > > HEP Contents > ============ > > Each HEP should contain the following: > > 1. Preamble -- Including the HEP number, a short descriptive title, > and the names of the authors. > > 2. Abstract -- A short (~200 word) description of the technical issue > being addressed. > > 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly > labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). > > 4. Design -- A high-level explanation of the design. It should cover > intended use cases, failure scenarios, and impact on the existing > system. > > 5. Motivation -- The motivation spells out the use case for the > feature and the benefits it provides. > > 6. Rationale -- The rationale describes what motivated the design and > why particular design decisions were made. It should describe > alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the > feature is designed in other systems. It should also consider whether > the feature could be achieved by layering atop the existing system > rather than modifying it. > > The rationale should provide evidence of consensus within the > community and discuss important objections or concerns raised during > discussion. > > 7. Backwards Compatibility -- All HEPs that introduce backwards > incompatibilities must include a section describing these > incompatibilities and their severity. The HEP must explain how the > author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. HEP submissions > without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be rejected > outright. > > > HEP Template > ============ > > HEPs should be plain text with minimal structural markup that adheres > to a rigid style. You can use this HEP as an example. Each HEP starts > with a header that contains the HEP number (or empty if the number has > not yet been assigned), title, list of authors and status (Draft, > Accepted, Rejected, or Withdrawn). > > > Auxiliary Files > =============== > > HEPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. Such files must be > named ``hep-XXXX-Y.ext``, where "XXXX" is the HEP number, "Y" is a > serial number (starting at 1), and "ext" is replaced by the actual > file extension (e.g. "png"). > > > References > ========== > > 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 > > 2. http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html > > 3. http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > Copyright > ========= > > This document has been placed in the public domain. > From general-return-1805-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 17:47:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69308 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 17:47:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 17:47:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 66657 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:47:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66574 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66566 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 17:47:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:47:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:47:41 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so5959254pvc.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.125.20 with SMTP id x20mr1388165wfc.89.1279129579081; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:46:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Konstantin, Thanks for taking a look, comments in-line. On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wr= ote: > Eli, > > Thanks for a really good proposal. > Some questions / comments: > > On voting > 1. Which voting rule? > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval > I think you mean the MajorityApproval as it does not have veto rule. > So may be it's just clarifying the reference. Good point, clarified so it's majority approval. > 2. Who can vote? > Usually PMCs have Binding Votes. > Would be good to have a sentence clarifying this. Yup, added. > 3. How long does the vote go? > Usual 3 days may not be enough. One week is reasonable? Specified one week. > 4. Discussion on public lists. > A HEP can evolve from a jira, then it should be counted as a public > discussion. I think it makes sense even to continue the discussion > there if so. Agreed, changed the wording to "If the scope of the idea is limited to a specific project the discussion may happen on the project-specific list or jira." > 5. How the set of editors is selected? > =A0 "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar = to > =A0 how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." > This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either volunteers or is rotated periodically. > 6. The level of design details. > I think HEP should have a pretty detailed design. When people vote they > will want to be sure the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. > Should we say "implementation-ready design", rather than > "A high-level explanation of the design." > Or just > "A _detailed_ explanation of the design." Rewrote this section, tried to make it more explicit about giving both a high-level view and complete enough description so the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. Also added that this section should cover how to test the design. > 7. Typos: > successuflly, apointed, intial Fixed. Updated draft follows. Thanks, Eli HEP: 1 Title: HEP Purpose and Guidelines Author: Eli Collins Status: Draft What is a HEP? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D HEP stands for Hadoop Enhancement Proposal, and is based on Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A HEP is a document that describes a new feature, it's rationale, and issues the feature needs to address in order to be successfully incorporated. The intent is for HEPs to be the primary mechanism for proposing significant new features to core Hadoop (common, HDFS and MapReduce), incorporating community feedback, and recording the proposal. Going through the HEP process should improve the chances that a proposal is successful. While HEPs do not need to come with code, they are a mechanism to propose features to the community, with the intent of contributing the feature, rather than request the community implement a feature. HEPs must be consistent with Apache bylaws [2], for example, the HEP workflow takes place on the public Apache Hadoop lists. When is a HEP Required? =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D HEPs should not impede casual contribution to Hadoop. Small improvements and bugs do not require HEPs. Not all features need HEPs. While the decision is subjective, here are some guidelines to indicate a HEP should be considered: - The feature impacts backwards compatibility (eg modifies released public APIs in an incompatible way). - The feature requires that an existing component be substantially re-designed (eg NameNode modified to use Bookkeeper). - The implementation impact multiple parts of the system (eg symbolic links versus adding a pluggable component like a codec). - The feature impacts the entire development community (eg converts the build system to use maven). HEP Workflow =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The author of a HEP should first try to determine if their idea is HEP-able by sending mail to the general list. If the scope of the idea is limited to a specific project the discussion may happen on the project-specific list or jira. This gives the author a chance to flesh out the proposal, address initial concerns, and figure out whether it has a chance of being accepted. The author's role is to build consensus, and gather dissenting opinions. Following this discussion the author should draft a HEP proposal following the HEP template. The proposal should accurately reflect and address feedback and dissenting opinions. For example, flesh out sections on backwards compatibility or testing. The author should send the draft of the proposal to hep@hadoop.apache.org for review. This is a new, public list for editors and those interested in following the review process. A set of editors reviews incoming HEPs. Each HEP is assigned a single primary editor. An editor may volunteer if they feel particular functional expertise is required or assign HEPs to editors round robin. The editor reviews the proposal and may request it be updated if it does not sufficiently address feedback raised during discussion, eg why the proposal is not redundant with existing functionality, or is technically sound, sufficiently motivated, covers backwards compatibility, etc. As updates are necessary, the HEP author can check in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new HEP versions to the editor for committing. In order to ensure HEP proposals make progress the editor should respond to proposal drafts within two weeks of receiving them (or the proposer can request another editor), and the proposer should generate updates to the draft within two weeks of receiving feedback from the editor. The editor's role is to determine if the proposal is complete, so that the proposal can be voted on, not whether they agree with the proposal itself. The editor's involvement should increase the chance that a HEP proposal makes it to a vote. Once the editor deems the proposal is complete they add it to a versioned HEP repository and the author posts the proposal to general@hadoop.apache.org for vote. HEP votes, like Apache procedural votes, use majority approval [3]. Only PMC members have binding votes. Votes are open for a period of 1 week to allow all active voters time to consider the proposal. Successful HEPs are assigned a number, unsuccessful HEPs remain drafts. The editors are appointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects. HEP Contents =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Each HEP should contain the following: 1. Preamble -- Including the HEP number, a short descriptive title, and the names of the authors. 2. Abstract -- A short (~200 word) description of the technical issue being addressed. 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). 4. Design -- This section should give both a high-level view and a complete description of the feature. While the design does not need to cover implementation detail it should be clear to the reader that the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. This section should cover intended use cases, failure scenarios, strategies for testing, and impact on the existing system. 5. Motivation -- The motivation spells out the use case for the feature and the benefits it provides. 6. Rationale -- The rationale describes what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the feature is designed in other systems. It should also consider whether the feature could be achieved by layering atop the existing system rather than modifying it. The rationale should provide evidence of consensus within the community and discuss important objections or concerns raised during discussion. 7. Backwards Compatibility -- All HEPs that introduce backwards incompatibilities must include a section describing these incompatibilities and their severity. The HEP must explain how the author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. HEP submissions without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be rejected outright. HEP Template =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D HEPs should be plain text with minimal structural markup that adheres to a rigid style. You can use this HEP as an example. Each HEP starts with a header that contains the HEP number (or empty if the number has not yet been assigned), title, list of authors and status (Draft, Accepted, Rejected, or Withdrawn). Auxiliary Files =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D HEPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. Such files must be named ``hep-XXXX-Y.ext``, where "XXXX" is the HEP number, "Y" is a serial number (starting at 1), and "ext" is replaced by the actual file extension (e.g. "png"). References =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 2. http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html 3. http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval Copyright =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This document has been placed in the public domain. From general-return-1806-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 17:55:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71402 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 17:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 17:55:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 82903 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:55:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82844 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 17:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82836 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 17:55:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:55:35 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so149615pxi.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.213.13 with SMTP id l13mr204800wfg.155.1279130108988; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:55:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:55:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Owen, Will there an updated draft of the bylaws to vote on? I was thinking of referencing hadoop bylaws in a draft of the HEP and remembered this vote didn't terminate. Thanks, Eli On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in Jan > 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked around > and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly complete. I > made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them over and vote. > In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. > > -- Owen > > > > > From general-return-1807-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 18:58:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12538 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 18:58:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 18:58:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 90513 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 18:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90463 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 18:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90455 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 18:58:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:58:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:58:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 12502 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 18:57:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.217]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:57:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:57:56 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HEP proposal References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? >> "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to >> how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." >> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? > > Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds > volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either > volunteers or is rotated periodically. Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each meeting. Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion Champions are volunteers. So, rather than assigning an editor, a HEP might ask for one to volunteer. Any PMC member might volunteer. Doug From general-return-1808-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 19:13:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23770 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 19:13:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 19:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9976 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 19:13:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9914 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 19:13:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9901 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 19:13:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:13:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:13:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c139.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.139]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o6EJCk0N019296 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:12:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-organization:user-agent; b=l2ZVOhIe3k7veQ5EYz2wFl8msgiZpKJ3KLVJ88dZlpcoV97So2M3EfaU3+VuoRtJ Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:12:46 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: HEP proposal Message-ID: <20100714191245.GF3418@goodenter-lm.boudnik.org> References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have been following this discussion for some time now and the only questi= on came to my mind: why mimicking PEP? Is it so astonishingly successful or is it much better than Apache voting or RFC process (from where it has been apparently derived). So far I see HEP as an over-complicated process for a process sake. I'd appreciate if some one can chip-in and tell me if and where I'm wrong. Thanks, Cos On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46AM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Konstantin, >=20 > Thanks for taking a look, comments in-line. >=20 > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > Eli, > > > > Thanks for a really good proposal. > > Some questions / comments: > > > > On voting > > 1. Which voting rule? > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval > > I think you mean the MajorityApproval as it does not have veto rule. > > So may be it's just clarifying the reference. >=20 > Good point, clarified so it's majority approval. >=20 > > 2. Who can vote? > > Usually PMCs have Binding Votes. > > Would be good to have a sentence clarifying this. >=20 > Yup, added. >=20 > > 3. How long does the vote go? > > Usual 3 days may not be enough. One week is reasonable? >=20 > Specified one week. >=20 > > 4. Discussion on public lists. > > A HEP can evolve from a jira, then it should be counted as a public > > discussion. I think it makes sense even to continue the discussion > > there if so. >=20 > Agreed, changed the wording to "If the scope of the idea is limited to > a specific project the discussion may happen on the project-specific > list or jira." >=20 > > 5. How the set of editors is selected? > > "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, simil= ar > to > > how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." > > This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? >=20 > Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds > volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either > volunteers or is rotated periodically. >=20 > > 6. The level of design details. > > I think HEP should have a pretty detailed design. When people vote t= hey > > will want to be sure the design can lead to a reasonable implementat= ion. > > Should we say "implementation-ready design", rather than > > "A high-level explanation of the design." > > Or just > > "A _detailed_ explanation of the design." >=20 > Rewrote this section, tried to make it more explicit about giving both > a high-level view and complete enough description so the design can > lead to a reasonable implementation. Also added that this section > should cover how to test the design. >=20 > > 7. Typos: > > successuflly, apointed, intial >=20 > Fixed. >=20 > Updated draft follows. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 > HEP: 1 > Title: HEP Purpose and Guidelines > Author: Eli Collins > Status: Draft >=20 > What is a HEP? > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > HEP stands for Hadoop Enhancement Proposal, and is based on Python's > PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A HEP is a document that > describes a new feature, it's rationale, and issues the feature needs > to address in order to be successfully incorporated. >=20 > The intent is for HEPs to be the primary mechanism for proposing > significant new features to core Hadoop (common, HDFS and MapReduce), > incorporating community feedback, and recording the proposal. Going > through the HEP process should improve the chances that a proposal is > successful. >=20 > While HEPs do not need to come with code, they are a mechanism to > propose features to the community, with the intent of contributing the > feature, rather than request the community implement a feature. >=20 > HEPs must be consistent with Apache bylaws [2], for example, the HEP > workflow takes place on the public Apache Hadoop lists. >=20 > When is a HEP Required? > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > HEPs should not impede casual contribution to Hadoop. Small > improvements and bugs do not require HEPs. Not all features need > HEPs. While the decision is subjective, here are some guidelines to > indicate a HEP should be considered: >=20 > - The feature impacts backwards compatibility (eg modifies released > public APIs in an incompatible way). >=20 > - The feature requires that an existing component be substantially > re-designed (eg NameNode modified to use Bookkeeper). >=20 > - The implementation impact multiple parts of the system (eg symbolic > links versus adding a pluggable component like a codec). >=20 > - The feature impacts the entire development community (eg converts > the build system to use maven). >=20 > HEP Workflow > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > The author of a HEP should first try to determine if their idea is > HEP-able by sending mail to the general list. If the scope of the > idea is limited to a specific project the discussion may happen on the > project-specific list or jira. This gives the author a chance to > flesh out the proposal, address initial concerns, and figure out > whether it has a chance of being accepted. The author's role is to > build consensus, and gather dissenting opinions. >=20 > Following this discussion the author should draft a HEP proposal > following the HEP template. The proposal should accurately reflect and > address feedback and dissenting opinions. For example, flesh out > sections on backwards compatibility or testing. The author should send > the draft of the proposal to hep@hadoop.apache.org for review. This > is a new, public list for editors and those interested in following > the review process. >=20 > A set of editors reviews incoming HEPs. Each HEP is assigned a single > primary editor. An editor may volunteer if they feel particular > functional expertise is required or assign HEPs to editors round > robin. >=20 > The editor reviews the proposal and may request it be updated if it > does not sufficiently address feedback raised during discussion, eg > why the proposal is not redundant with existing functionality, or is > technically sound, sufficiently motivated, covers backwards > compatibility, etc. As updates are necessary, the HEP author can check > in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new HEP > versions to the editor for committing. In order to ensure HEP > proposals make progress the editor should respond to proposal drafts > within two weeks of receiving them (or the proposer can request > another editor), and the proposer should generate updates to the draft > within two weeks of receiving feedback from the editor. >=20 > The editor's role is to determine if the proposal is complete, so that > the proposal can be voted on, not whether they agree with the proposal > itself. The editor's involvement should increase the chance that a > HEP proposal makes it to a vote. >=20 > Once the editor deems the proposal is complete they add it to a > versioned HEP repository and the author posts the proposal to > general@hadoop.apache.org for vote. HEP votes, like Apache procedural > votes, use majority approval [3]. Only PMC members have binding votes. > Votes are open for a period of 1 week to allow all active voters time > to consider the proposal. Successful HEPs are assigned a number, > unsuccessful HEPs remain drafts. >=20 > The editors are appointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar > to how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects. >=20 > HEP Contents > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > Each HEP should contain the following: >=20 > 1. Preamble -- Including the HEP number, a short descriptive title, > and the names of the authors. >=20 > 2. Abstract -- A short (~200 word) description of the technical issue > being addressed. >=20 > 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly > labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). >=20 > 4. Design -- This section should give both a high-level view and a > complete description of the feature. While the design does not need > to cover implementation detail it should be clear to the reader that > the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. This section > should cover intended use cases, failure scenarios, strategies for > testing, and impact on the existing system. >=20 > 5. Motivation -- The motivation spells out the use case for the > feature and the benefits it provides. >=20 > 6. Rationale -- The rationale describes what motivated the design and > why particular design decisions were made. It should describe > alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the > feature is designed in other systems. It should also consider whether > the feature could be achieved by layering atop the existing system > rather than modifying it. >=20 > The rationale should provide evidence of consensus within the > community and discuss important objections or concerns raised during > discussion. >=20 > 7. Backwards Compatibility -- All HEPs that introduce backwards > incompatibilities must include a section describing these > incompatibilities and their severity. The HEP must explain how the > author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. HEP submissions > without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be rejected > outright. >=20 > HEP Template > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > HEPs should be plain text with minimal structural markup that adheres > to a rigid style. You can use this HEP as an example. Each HEP starts > with a header that contains the HEP number (or empty if the number has > not yet been assigned), title, list of authors and status (Draft, > Accepted, Rejected, or Withdrawn). >=20 > Auxiliary Files > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > HEPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. Such files must be > named ``hep-XXXX-Y.ext``, where "XXXX" is the HEP number, "Y" is a > serial number (starting at 1), and "ext" is replaced by the actual > file extension (e.g. "png"). >=20 > References > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 >=20 > 2. http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html >=20 > 3. http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >=20 > Copyright > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > This document has been placed in the public domain. --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkw+DC0ACgkQMqXifkwDoaGyCAD/YQO2XmFYRJaA1j1W54vBajXg 8C252gCSr056wtKDcGYBAJqAet0YEsOu+g+clF77Vu+3r3I0TL5RHia4Im1n+6Tq =lscd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TU+u6i6jrDPzmlWF-- From general-return-1809-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 19:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38740 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 19:56:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 19:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 49328 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 19:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49241 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 19:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49233 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 19:56:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:56:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:56:29 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so72900pzk.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:56:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.213.13 with SMTP id l13mr452654wfg.155.1279137367318; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:56:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100714191245.GF3418@goodenter-lm.boudnik.org> References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <20100714191245.GF3418@goodenter-lm.boudnik.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:56:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wr= ote: > I have been following this discussion for some time now and the only ques= tion > came to my mind: why mimicking PEP? Is it so astonishingly successful or = is > it much better than Apache voting or RFC process (from where it has been > apparently derived). I thought it would be more fruitful to adapt an existing, working model rather than invent a new one. I based it on PEP after looking at what other projects used; PEP seems to strike a balance between no structure and more heavy weight processes (JSR, RFC). I'm open to other models if there's something you think is more suitable. > So far I see HEP as an over-complicated process for a process sake. I'd a= ppreciate if some one can chip-in and tell me if and where I'm wrong. I think that's a reasonable opinion. There are communities that function without process. In the limited time I've been working on Hadoop there's been tension between substantially modifying the system and preserving it's stability. It seemed to me that some additional structure around discussing change up front would help relieve some of that tension. There is value in thinking and discussing what you're doing up front in a way that's visible to the community. HEP essentially enforces that. If that happens naturally I agree we don't need the process. If people think what we've currently got is sufficient I'm happy to chalk it up as a learning experience, don't want people to adopt it just because I've taken the time to draft something. Thanks, Eli > Thanks, > =A0Cos > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:46AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> =A0 =A0Hey Konstantin, >> >> =A0 =A0Thanks for taking a look, comments in-line. >> >> =A0 =A0On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> =A0 =A0wrote: >> =A0 =A0> Eli, >> =A0 =A0> >> =A0 =A0> Thanks for a really good proposal. >> =A0 =A0> Some questions / comments: >> =A0 =A0> >> =A0 =A0> On voting >> =A0 =A0> 1. Which voting rule? >> =A0 =A0> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApprova= l >> =A0 =A0> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >> =A0 =A0> I think you mean the MajorityApproval as it does not have veto = rule. >> =A0 =A0> So may be it's just clarifying the reference. >> >> =A0 =A0Good point, clarified so it's majority approval. >> >> =A0 =A0> 2. Who can vote? >> =A0 =A0> Usually PMCs have Binding Votes. >> =A0 =A0> Would be good to have a sentence clarifying this. >> >> =A0 =A0Yup, added. >> >> =A0 =A0> 3. How long does the vote go? >> =A0 =A0> Usual 3 days may not be enough. One week is reasonable? >> >> =A0 =A0Specified one week. >> >> =A0 =A0> 4. Discussion on public lists. >> =A0 =A0> A HEP can evolve from a jira, then it should be counted as a pu= blic >> =A0 =A0> discussion. I think it makes sense even to continue the discuss= ion >> =A0 =A0> there if so. >> >> =A0 =A0Agreed, changed the wording to "If the scope of the idea is limit= ed to >> =A0 =A0a specific project the discussion may happen on the project-speci= fic >> =A0 =A0list or jira." >> >> =A0 =A0> 5. How the set of editors is selected? >> =A0 =A0> =A0 "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally= , similar >> =A0 =A0to >> =A0 =A0> =A0 how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." >> =A0 =A0> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherd= s? >> >> =A0 =A0Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepher= ds >> =A0 =A0volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either >> =A0 =A0volunteers or is rotated periodically. >> >> =A0 =A0> 6. The level of design details. >> =A0 =A0> I think HEP should have a pretty detailed design. When people v= ote they >> =A0 =A0> will want to be sure the design can lead to a reasonable implem= entation. >> =A0 =A0> Should we say "implementation-ready design", rather than >> =A0 =A0> "A high-level explanation of the design." >> =A0 =A0> Or just >> =A0 =A0> "A _detailed_ explanation of the design." >> >> =A0 =A0Rewrote this section, tried to make it more explicit about giving= both >> =A0 =A0a high-level view and complete enough description so the design c= an >> =A0 =A0lead to a reasonable implementation. Also added that this section >> =A0 =A0should cover how to test the design. >> >> =A0 =A0> 7. Typos: >> =A0 =A0> successuflly, apointed, intial >> >> =A0 =A0Fixed. >> >> =A0 =A0Updated draft follows. >> >> =A0 =A0Thanks, >> =A0 =A0Eli >> >> =A0 =A0HEP: 1 >> =A0 =A0Title: HEP Purpose and Guidelines >> =A0 =A0Author: Eli Collins >> =A0 =A0Status: Draft >> >> =A0 =A0What is a HEP? >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0HEP stands for Hadoop Enhancement Proposal, and is based on Pytho= n's >> =A0 =A0PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. =A0A HEP is a document tha= t >> =A0 =A0describes a new feature, it's rationale, and issues the feature n= eeds >> =A0 =A0to address in order to be successfully incorporated. >> >> =A0 =A0The intent is for HEPs to be the primary mechanism for proposing >> =A0 =A0significant new features to core Hadoop (common, HDFS and MapRedu= ce), >> =A0 =A0incorporating community feedback, and recording the proposal. =A0= Going >> =A0 =A0through the HEP process should improve the chances that a proposa= l is >> =A0 =A0successful. >> >> =A0 =A0While HEPs do not need to come with code, they are a mechanism to >> =A0 =A0propose features to the community, with the intent of contributin= g the >> =A0 =A0feature, rather than request the community implement a feature. >> >> =A0 =A0HEPs must be consistent with Apache bylaws [2], for example, the = HEP >> =A0 =A0workflow takes place on the public Apache Hadoop lists. >> >> =A0 =A0When is a HEP Required? >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0HEPs should not impede casual contribution to Hadoop. =A0Small >> =A0 =A0improvements and bugs do not require HEPs. =A0Not all features ne= ed >> =A0 =A0HEPs. =A0While the decision is subjective, here are some guidelin= es to >> =A0 =A0indicate a HEP should be considered: >> >> =A0 =A0- The feature impacts backwards compatibility (eg modifies releas= ed >> =A0 =A0public APIs in an incompatible way). >> >> =A0 =A0- The feature requires that an existing component be substantiall= y >> =A0 =A0re-designed (eg NameNode modified to use Bookkeeper). >> >> =A0 =A0- The implementation impact multiple parts of the system (eg symb= olic >> =A0 =A0links versus adding a pluggable component like a codec). >> >> =A0 =A0- The feature impacts the entire development community (eg conver= ts >> =A0 =A0the build system to use maven). >> >> =A0 =A0HEP Workflow >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0The author of a HEP should first try to determine if their idea i= s >> =A0 =A0HEP-able by sending mail to the general list. =A0If the scope of = the >> =A0 =A0idea is limited to a specific project the discussion may happen o= n the >> =A0 =A0project-specific list or jira. =A0This gives the author a chance = to >> =A0 =A0flesh out the proposal, address initial concerns, and figure out >> =A0 =A0whether it has a chance of being accepted. =A0The author's role i= s to >> =A0 =A0build consensus, and gather dissenting opinions. >> >> =A0 =A0Following this discussion the author should draft a HEP proposal >> =A0 =A0following the HEP template. The proposal should accurately reflec= t and >> =A0 =A0address feedback and dissenting opinions. =A0For example, flesh o= ut >> =A0 =A0sections on backwards compatibility or testing. The author should= send >> =A0 =A0the draft of the proposal to hep@hadoop.apache.org for review. = =A0This >> =A0 =A0is a new, public list for editors and those interested in followi= ng >> =A0 =A0the review process. >> >> =A0 =A0A set of editors reviews incoming HEPs. Each HEP is assigned a si= ngle >> =A0 =A0primary editor. An editor may volunteer if they feel particular >> =A0 =A0functional expertise is required or assign HEPs to editors round >> =A0 =A0robin. >> >> =A0 =A0The editor reviews the proposal and may request it be updated if = it >> =A0 =A0does not sufficiently address feedback raised during discussion, = eg >> =A0 =A0why the proposal is not redundant with existing functionality, or= is >> =A0 =A0technically sound, sufficiently motivated, covers backwards >> =A0 =A0compatibility, etc. As updates are necessary, the HEP author can = check >> =A0 =A0in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new= HEP >> =A0 =A0versions to the editor for committing. In order to ensure HEP >> =A0 =A0proposals make progress the editor should respond to proposal dra= fts >> =A0 =A0within two weeks of receiving them (or the proposer can request >> =A0 =A0another editor), and the proposer should generate updates to the = draft >> =A0 =A0within two weeks of receiving feedback from the editor. >> >> =A0 =A0The editor's role is to determine if the proposal is complete, so= that >> =A0 =A0the proposal can be voted on, not whether they agree with the pro= posal >> =A0 =A0itself. =A0The editor's involvement should increase the chance th= at a >> =A0 =A0HEP proposal makes it to a vote. >> >> =A0 =A0Once the editor deems the proposal is complete they add it to a >> =A0 =A0versioned HEP repository and the author posts the proposal to >> =A0 =A0general@hadoop.apache.org for vote. =A0HEP votes, like Apache pro= cedural >> =A0 =A0votes, use majority approval [3]. Only PMC members have binding v= otes. >> =A0 =A0Votes are open for a period of 1 week to allow all active voters = time >> =A0 =A0to consider the proposal. Successful HEPs are assigned a number, >> =A0 =A0unsuccessful HEPs remain drafts. >> >> =A0 =A0The editors are appointed and removed by the PMC informally, simi= lar >> =A0 =A0to how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects. >> >> =A0 =A0HEP Contents >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0Each HEP should contain the following: >> >> =A0 =A01. Preamble -- Including the HEP number, a short descriptive titl= e, >> =A0 =A0and the names of the authors. >> >> =A0 =A02. Abstract -- A short (~200 word) description of the technical i= ssue >> =A0 =A0being addressed. >> >> =A0 =A03. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly >> =A0 =A0labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an examp= le). >> >> =A0 =A04. Design -- This section should give both a high-level view and = a >> =A0 =A0complete description of the feature. =A0While the design does not= need >> =A0 =A0to cover implementation detail it should be clear to the reader t= hat >> =A0 =A0the design can lead to a reasonable implementation. =A0This secti= on >> =A0 =A0should cover intended use cases, failure scenarios, strategies fo= r >> =A0 =A0testing, and impact on the existing system. >> >> =A0 =A05. Motivation -- The motivation spells out the use case for the >> =A0 =A0feature and the benefits it provides. >> >> =A0 =A06. Rationale -- The rationale describes what motivated the design= and >> =A0 =A0why particular design decisions were made. =A0It should describe >> =A0 =A0alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how= the >> =A0 =A0feature is designed in other systems. It should also consider whe= ther >> =A0 =A0the feature could be achieved by layering atop the existing syste= m >> =A0 =A0rather than modifying it. >> >> =A0 =A0The rationale should provide evidence of consensus within the >> =A0 =A0community and discuss important objections or concerns raised dur= ing >> =A0 =A0discussion. >> >> =A0 =A07. Backwards Compatibility -- All HEPs that introduce backwards >> =A0 =A0incompatibilities must include a section describing these >> =A0 =A0incompatibilities and their severity. =A0The HEP must explain how= the >> =A0 =A0author proposes to deal with these incompatibilities. =A0HEP subm= issions >> =A0 =A0without a sufficient backwards compatibility treatise may be reje= cted >> =A0 =A0outright. >> >> =A0 =A0HEP Template >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0HEPs should be plain text with minimal structural markup that adh= eres >> =A0 =A0to a rigid style. =A0You can use this HEP as an example. Each HEP= starts >> =A0 =A0with a header that contains the HEP number (or empty if the numbe= r has >> =A0 =A0not yet been assigned), title, list of authors and status (Draft, >> =A0 =A0Accepted, Rejected, or Withdrawn). >> >> =A0 =A0Auxiliary Files >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0HEPs may include auxiliary files such as diagrams. =A0Such files = must be >> =A0 =A0named ``hep-XXXX-Y.ext``, where "XXXX" is the HEP number, "Y" is = a >> =A0 =A0serial number (starting at 1), and "ext" is replaced by the actua= l >> =A0 =A0file extension (e.g. "png"). >> >> =A0 =A0References >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A01. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 >> >> =A0 =A02. http://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html >> >> =A0 =A03. http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApprova= l >> >> =A0 =A0Copyright >> =A0 =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> =A0 =A0This document has been placed in the public domain. > From general-return-1810-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 20:09:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46729 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 20:09:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 20:09:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 61799 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 20:09:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61665 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 20:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61656 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 20:09:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:09:15 +0000 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so205208gyg.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HOFSBg9pDcFHxqCBCSRblSipZBj8Sshs43ik/0FW+Y0=; b=KQE6xHgXWYIm5AShKyfpFmC74xCIYRserK8aEpPYGa0v3kLBngGQAKZb0kCfKQQnFq uf9iDiT4mvzu5b3WvMsnEjZqBQPf1DUuc85AkF/S4o9hvl9JjUub1xWUDHG6A7uZfRFP 1NQvSoxYDTh3hNojRmRWlDk/O56Tpu+kbtuHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YrfoPucyROd3ToGUMTXa2gCeTvku+Ez3bE72A2aTmL5II8jYJI4DuLkfa1mQf7DGJl hVq0fMPUPsEDLfc6/+93VMGxDLP6epg3Ul4Icc/1Ds87jketD2MsD47sic8W4VKocrsQ eBcwaE4M+8B0m6+lMHKKfDMJmt4a6w+OJ5w1g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.68.6 with SMTP id v6mr19119258ank.117.1279138134647; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.4.24 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:08:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:08:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException in Hadoop From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1ee8226407048b5e8e27 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016368e1ee8226407048b5e8e27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I assume you have used jar command to confirm that org.myorg.WordCount is i= n wordcount.jar On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:59 PM, james isaac wr= ote: > This is the command i used and prompt is pointing to the current director= y > where wordcount.jar resides. I have also set the path for the HADOOP_HOME > and added the bin directory of hadoop to the classpath. > > current directory =3D /home/user/demo/wordcount > HADOOP_HOME=3D/home/user/hadoop_sws/hadoop-0.20.2 > $ hadoop jar wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount /hdfs/data/input > /hdfs/data/output > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Please give the commandline you used. > > You should have specified the jar containing WordCount class. > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:15 AM, james isaac > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have just started my career with Hadoop. I tried to execute the > example > > > given in > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/mapred_tutorial.htmlas > > > explained in the tutorial. I was not able to execute the program as > > > described in the tutorial. I am getting the error as shown below. I > tried > > > executing with some other examples. They are also showing the same > > > =93ClassNotFoundException=94. I tried to find the solution in various > > websites > > > but i could not find it. Please help me to find the problem. > > > > > > Exception in thread "main" > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.myorg.WordCount > > > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) > > > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > > > at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:149) > > > > > > --0016368e1ee8226407048b5e8e27-- From general-return-1811-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 14 22:01:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98668 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 22:01:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 22:01:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 23298 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 22:01:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23244 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 22:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23236 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 22:01:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:01:43 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so323448pxi.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:00:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.142.15 with SMTP id p15mr18481449wfd.208.1279144820950; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:00:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:00:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e6b8abc64c048b601cc8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2e6b8abc64c048b601cc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? >>> "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar to >>> how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." >>> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? >>> >> >> Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds >> volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either >> volunteers or is rotated periodically. >> > > Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each meeting. > Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion > > Champions are volunteers. So, rather than assigning an editor, a HEP might > ask for one to volunteer. Any PMC member might volunteer. > That sounds reasonable. Having a PMC member volunteer will likely result in someone who has more expertise in the area and will perhaps be more responsive. Thanks, Eli --000e0cd2e6b8abc64c048b601cc8-- From general-return-1812-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 01:25:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67299 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 01:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 01:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 21612 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 01:25:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21562 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 01:25:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21554 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 01:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:25:33 +0000 Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so472521vws.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.157.140 with SMTP id b12mr9219815vcx.16.1279157052157; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:24:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.174.100 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:23:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:23:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e8877d7b4adfb048b62f525 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e0cb4e8877d7b4adfb048b62f525 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Eli, Great work. I like where this is going. Here's something that I think might be problematic: 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). "must either be placed in the public domain, or..?" I assume the alternative is an open source copyright license? You should state what this is. PEP's alternative is "licensed under the Open Publication License." ( http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) Is that your intent? Upon acceptance of a PEP, the PEP workflow states that it should be checked into svn. Are we planning to host accepted HEPs in the Hadoop svn? If so, we should specify that non-public-domain HEPs should be placed under a license listed on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html. The Open Publication License isn't listed there. Nor are the GFDL and other documentation licenses (presumably not because they're not specifically allowed, but because Apache deals with code more than documentation). Note that CC/Attribution/Share-Alike is allowed. You may want to recommend that one? - Aaron On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? > >>> "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, similar > to > >>> how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." > >>> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? > >>> > >> > >> Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds > >> volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either > >> volunteers or is rotated periodically. > >> > > > > Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each > meeting. > > Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion > > > > Champions are volunteers. So, rather than assigning an editor, a HEP > might > > ask for one to volunteer. Any PMC member might volunteer. > > > > That sounds reasonable. Having a PMC member volunteer will likely result in > someone who has more expertise in the area and will perhaps be more > responsive. > > Thanks, > Eli > --e0cb4e8877d7b4adfb048b62f525-- From general-return-1813-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 05:37:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33475 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 05:37:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 05:37:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60390 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 05:37:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60022 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 05:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60006 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 05:37:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:37:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:37:47 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so379287gwj.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:36:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MxHRGGPVqQFmCLXb0MdmYiyCU2LUmVgm687xzlIJBcI=; b=PbDe9uKhM+mXGKRyT8E7lpDa+dCwnNTxePCHh0sB8ZDhmWHJWfjflBJc/CyLloRAlH 8oc6rIFJLN65ep2vn/Q1plG9p3PhzDogu8br9CIIyXM8VTXpVdgdXsIJumkXRZfCx80H uY8fLAK7t2645XjmyuyaKu584Ae6WYbKoLRGU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SxXnYE37VljchRRTrWijtAcmINuuZ4NtX9tQZrMgt92oHAoBCaouzUOmvuhPy4Y51E 2XyLIrpHBueBmBNLjHnR1FvkuJTzb+Sg2aKhRW2KJY/mV3BdW7tMUZmAQX0bogoV04ER XfsxUMh0zbHcBU7TNstgNnBw5vt/B/Z3HeKI8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.18.21 with SMTP id v21mr8977454ybi.237.1279172185839; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.107.2 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:36:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:36:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf1704be602d048b667bec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cdf1704be602d048b667bec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 on a related note, since a HEP-initiator might not be a apache committer, does it mean that it is the responsibility of the editor/champion to check versions of the HEP proposal into svn? thanks, dhruba On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Eli, > > Great work. I like where this is going. > > Here's something that I think might be problematic: > > 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly > labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). > > > "must either be placed in the public domain, or..?" I assume the > alternative > is an open source copyright license? You should state what this is. PEP's > alternative is "licensed under the Open Publication License." ( > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) Is that your intent? > > Upon acceptance of a PEP, the PEP workflow states that it should be checked > into svn. Are we planning to host accepted HEPs in the Hadoop svn? If so, > we > should specify that non-public-domain HEPs should be placed under a license > listed on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html. The Open Publication > License isn't listed there. Nor are the GFDL and other documentation > licenses (presumably not because they're not specifically allowed, but > because Apache deals with code more than documentation). Note that > CC/Attribution/Share-Alike is allowed. You may want to recommend that one? > > - Aaron > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Doug Cutting > wrote: > > > > > On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > > > >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? > > >>> "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, > similar > > to > > >>> how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." > > >>> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? > > >>> > > >> > > >> Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds > > >> volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either > > >> volunteers or is rotated periodically. > > >> > > > > > > Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each > > meeting. > > > Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion > > > > > > Champions are volunteers. So, rather than assigning an editor, a HEP > > might > > > ask for one to volunteer. Any PMC member might volunteer. > > > > > > > That sounds reasonable. Having a PMC member volunteer will likely result > in > > someone who has more expertise in the area and will perhaps be more > > responsive. > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cdf1704be602d048b667bec-- From general-return-1814-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 06:41:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57644 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 06:41:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 06:41:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 95887 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 06:41:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95495 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 06:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95487 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 06:41:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:41:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:41:22 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so276368pzk.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:41:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.211.6 with SMTP id j6mr23044062wfg.164.1279176060676; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:41:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:41:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:41:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Eli, > > Great work. I like where this is going. > > Here's something that I think might be problematic: > > 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly > labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). > > > "must either be placed in the public domain, or..?" I assume the alternat= ive > is an open source copyright license? I was assuming HEPs would just be placed in the public domain, period. Like design docs posted on jira they're just text posted to a mailing list, not sure checking them into svn needs to require they have an alternate license. Something I'm missing? Thanks, Eli You should state what this is. PEP's > alternative is "licensed under the Open Publication License." =A0( > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) Is that your intent? > > Upon acceptance of a PEP, the PEP workflow states that it should be check= ed > into svn. Are we planning to host accepted HEPs in the Hadoop svn? If so,= we > should specify that non-public-domain HEPs should be placed under a licen= se > listed on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html. The Open Publication > License isn't listed there. Nor are the GFDL and other documentation > licenses (presumably not because they're not specifically allowed, but > because Apache deals with code more than documentation). Note that > CC/Attribution/Share-Alike is allowed. You may want to recommend that one= ? > > - Aaron > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Doug Cutting wrot= e: >> >> > On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> > >> >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? >> >>> =A0 "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, sim= ilar >> to >> >>> =A0 how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." >> >>> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? >> >>> >> >> >> >> Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds >> >> volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either >> >> volunteers or is rotated periodically. >> >> >> > >> > Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each >> meeting. >> > =A0Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? >> > >> > >> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#C= hampion >> > >> > Champions are volunteers. =A0So, rather than assigning an editor, a HE= P >> might >> > ask for one to volunteer. =A0Any PMC member might volunteer. >> > >> >> That sounds reasonable. Having a PMC member volunteer will likely result= in >> someone who has more expertise in the area and will perhaps be more >> responsive. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> > From general-return-1815-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 06:42:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57876 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 06:42:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 06:42:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 96764 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 06:42:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96693 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 06:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96684 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 06:42:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:42:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:42:31 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so545534pxi.35 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:42:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.199.20 with SMTP id w20mr22126907wff.27.1279176129508; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:42:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:42:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HEP proposal From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yup. "As updates are necessary, the HEP author can check in new versions if they have commit permissions, or can email new HEP versions to the editor for committing." Thanks, Eli On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote= : > on a related note, since a HEP-initiator might not be a apache committer, > does it mean that it is the responsibility of the editor/champion to chec= k > versions of the HEP proposal into svn? > > thanks, > dhruba > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote= : > >> Eli, >> >> Great work. I like where this is going. >> >> Here's something that I think might be problematic: >> >> 3. Copyright/public domain -- Each HEP must either be explicitly >> labelled as placed in the public domain (see this HEP as an example). >> >> >> "must either be placed in the public domain, or..?" I assume the >> alternative >> is an open source copyright license? You should state what this is. PEP'= s >> alternative is "licensed under the Open Publication License." =A0( >> http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) Is that your intent? >> >> Upon acceptance of a PEP, the PEP workflow states that it should be chec= ked >> into svn. Are we planning to host accepted HEPs in the Hadoop svn? If so= , >> we >> should specify that non-public-domain HEPs should be placed under a lice= nse >> listed on http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html. The Open Publicatio= n >> License isn't listed there. Nor are the GFDL and other documentation >> licenses (presumably not because they're not specifically allowed, but >> because Apache deals with code more than documentation). Note that >> CC/Attribution/Share-Alike is allowed. You may want to recommend that on= e? >> >> - Aaron >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Doug Cutting >> wrote: >> > >> > > On 07/14/2010 10:46 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> > > >> > >> 5. How the set of editors is selected? >> > >>> =A0 "The editors are apointed and removed by the PMC informally, >> similar >> > to >> > >>> =A0 how the Apache Board appoints shepherds to projects." >> > >>> This needs a reference. How does Apache Board appoints shepherds? >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> Good question, anyone know? Since it's informal I imagine shepherds >> > >> volunteer. The editors could be a subset of the PMC that either >> > >> volunteers or is rotated periodically. >> > >> >> > > >> > > Shepherds are assigned randomly by the chair 48 hours before each >> > meeting. >> > > =A0Perhaps a better analogy for an editor is an Incubator Champion? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#C= hampion >> > > >> > > Champions are volunteers. =A0So, rather than assigning an editor, a = HEP >> > might >> > > ask for one to volunteer. =A0Any PMC member might volunteer. >> > > >> > >> > That sounds reasonable. Having a PMC member volunteer will likely resu= lt >> in >> > someone who has more expertise in the area and will perhaps be more >> > responsive. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eli >> > >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > From general-return-1816-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 08:28:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17964 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 08:28:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 08:28:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 15738 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 08:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15152 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 08:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15143 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 08:28:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.17.9] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.17.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:28:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.101] (p4FE235EF.dip.t-dialin.net [79.226.53.239]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LbQ1i-1Ows1r2Bty-00kRQh; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:27:29 +0200 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] London Open Source Search meetup - Wed 28 July From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Kriegler To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:27:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1279182449.7495.11.camel@rene-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:LkTEB2E+hk17N803dtqNLp4UDXhJ1wfSQv2VskjrcUT ZGOIm9obTorSsRmDJpnQND1MZLAz94YkNrmNOnBx1+6ydFoXY5 wUdEMwzQyk7F7bOENh3aJatni6UNmTGqIXzR+PMeKz3gWAVdPz EnZUK2atDz/V7b7SqWZzNIeyRvCm4diIuw794YnxkWYggfgWfk wse5pYqJmpJ9LfW3SWQn2Ns9EV/uX8IegXD7yyGr8k= X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, We are organising another open source search social evening in London on Wednesday the 28 July. As usual the plan is to get together and chat about search technology, from Lucene to Solr, Hadoop, Mahout, Xapian and the like - bringing together people from across the field to discuss ideas and ask questions over a quiet drink. For directions to this meetup and for the Meetup.com group see: http://www.meetup.com/london-search-social/=20 Please come along if you can! Ren=C3=A9 & Rich (Marr) From general-return-1817-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 17:01:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40554 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 17:01:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 17:01:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26670 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:01:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26552 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:01:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26544 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 17:01:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:01:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:01:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 40471 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 17:01:22 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.217]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:01:22 +0000 Message-ID: <4C3F3EE1.10208@apache.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:01:21 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HEP proposal References: <4C3CD27F.60003@yahoo-inc.com> <4C3E08B4.60205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07/14/2010 11:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > I was assuming HEPs would just be placed in the public domain, period. > Like design docs posted on jira they're just text posted to a mailing > list, not sure checking them into svn needs to require they have an > alternate license. Something I'm missing? If they were distributed with releases then they should be under the Apache license, but I don't see that HEPs will be distributed with releases, so public domain seems sufficient. Doug From general-return-1818-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 17:45:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64298 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 17:45:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 17:45:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 88419 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:45:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88336 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88328 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 17:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:45:04 +0000 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so1177220gyg.35 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:43:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BUPaO4uyrpDLbGHDkGPJZXUqiCgIAs1M17DtOKa2tbo=; b=b6LhI9SdOgTgkcPR1Mz5Yue5v+SsGdSp0oNZwtIHxEJjR0wTfWn33R0kHvHC/VRGtt 95/2yDaVzTszkgoGgchSdFFrzel/u4coRf0yDMX10+vcSk+1Ec4HivyMB2wSYyo2iA5V Vlbg6kh9PDtRAUat2ptPllqHBcN9E2uuFa8rc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=oauj07SnUvjczj7gycJNUcsxw1fNhzAqCxD7JOhZJbnw1PJoVe3RIIKG/H3dXdZ5AH JGsBmbcmCC2vQyXppg1t/7Zg0AqBS8FiU1wtmgRlqLc/Br+Km8g+AF7sYFbI4ysOp9kO fkuhws+l8J+rsf7Z5J21k+8QwWlIUm/BOw35A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.171.40 with SMTP id y40mr5366ano.7.1279215822714; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.46.4 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:43:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago area Hadoop User Group Meeting - July 21st From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c923ccb43662048b70a49b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c923ccb43662048b70a49b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The next meeting of the Chicago area Hadoop User Group will be help next Wednesday, July 21st from 6:00-8:00PM. The meeting will be held at Orbitz Worldwide headquarters located in the Citigroup building at 500 West Madison in downtown Chicago. We'll hear from Collin Bennett of Open Data Group who will talk about work he's been doing to apply Hadoop to solve data analysis problems. Much thanks to our host Orbitz and our sponsor Cloudera. More details and RSVP here: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoop-User- Group-CHUG/ Hope to see you there! Jonathan --001636c923ccb43662048b70a49b-- From general-return-1819-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 18:41:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91189 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 18:41:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 18:41:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 61887 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 18:41:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61825 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 18:41:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61816 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 18:41:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:41:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdwasti@hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.54.190.22] (HELO bay0-omc1-s11.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:41:09 +0000 Received: from BAY145-W60 ([65.54.190.61]) by bay0-omc1-s11.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:40:27 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_06b5619b-6c8f-4678-bee4-618ea52b7b1f_" X-Originating-IP: [208.84.47.48] From: Syed Wasti To: Subject: Data Block Size ? Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:40:27 -0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2010 18:40:27.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[317E65C0:01CB244D] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_06b5619b-6c8f-4678-bee4-618ea52b7b1f_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C I am new to hadoop and looking for some answers to clear my basic concepts = on Hadoop. Will it matter what the data block size is ?=20 It is recommended to have a block size of 64 MB=2C but if we want to have t= he data block size to 128 MB=2C should this effect the performance ? Does the size of the map jobs created on each datanodes in anyway depend th= e block size ? Thanks for the support. Regards Syed = --_06b5619b-6c8f-4678-bee4-618ea52b7b1f_-- From general-return-1820-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 18:49:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93342 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 18:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 18:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 71648 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 18:49:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71511 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 18:49:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71503 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 18:49:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:49:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:49:27 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=W3haW7mDEoZnqSijZmFeWXpEZBLVgT1CYn2WSVjAaRXEiX6ugg+s+N1u v/+U7dV6FH4eWzgg13eUGqTHwbNz7XsSPZd48BS2lgxT4MnxQslqHpjlZ 4UXk+v3tDv4xkZC; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1279219767; x=1310755767; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Data=20Block=20Size=20?|Date:=20Thu,=20 15=20Jul=202010=2018:49:04=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<6FB97C9 2-99C8-42BC-A7C8-6724F0C3ADCD@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=Mu0/j/YPUbaUokxRJsXKe1EueMFE7Gb8yggDrFRnbLQ=; b=wBqRQMU1P6mrrgI4Yks5idd20SsJzB9bxzqYNiqv/5NmyQiMrdEETQ+T fBLvJLBi8onUU/WJZ3uIj8I/QbKs/pmxbJW+1/OcH4xlGdtNf76R9Vy3K nxWEUwBRf0m7pNQ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,210,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="13645916" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:49:05 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Data Block Size ? Thread-Topic: Data Block Size ? Thread-Index: AQHLJE1Ri3UPDvrVXk6fTiZOZu6/ZJKyyYkA Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:49:04 +0000 Message-ID: <6FB97C92-99C8-42BC-A7C8-6724F0C3ADCD@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Syed Wasti wrote: > Will it matter what the data block size is ?=20 Yes. > It is recommended to have a block size of 64 MB, but if we want to have t= he data block size to 128 MB, should this effect the performance ? Yes. FWIW, we run with 128MB. > Does the size of the map jobs created on each datanodes in anyway depend = the block size ? Yes. Unless told otherwise, Hadoop will generally use the # of maps =3D=3D # of = blocks. So if you have fewer blocks to process, you'll have fewer maps to = do more work. This is not necessarily a bad thing; it all depends upon you= r workload, size of grid, etc. From general-return-1821-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 19:14:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4620 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 19:14:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 19:14:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 514 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 19:14:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 312 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 19:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 304 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 19:14:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:14:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdwasti@hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.54.190.29] (HELO bay0-omc1-s18.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:13:55 +0000 Received: from BAY145-W26 ([65.54.190.61]) by bay0-omc1-s18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:13:34 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_205c9cf3-1b6f-44e2-ae6d-45613cebdf73_" X-Originating-IP: [208.84.47.48] From: Syed Wasti To: Hadoop Subject: RE: Data Block Size ? Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:13:34 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <6FB97C92-99C8-42BC-A7C8-6724F0C3ADCD@linkedin.com> References: ,<6FB97C92-99C8-42BC-A7C8-6724F0C3ADCD@linkedin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2010 19:13:34.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1DD6710:01CB2451] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_205c9cf3-1b6f-44e2-ae6d-45613cebdf73_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Allen. So=2C is it fair to assume that if I have smaller block size (64 MB)=2C the= n my blocks are distributed across more datanodes and because my blocks are= around more datanodes=2C then my map jobs should also run on different dat= anodes and becuase the maps size will be smaller=2C it should execute faste= r using less resources.=20 Should this work this way ? or is there any algorithm on how the blocks sho= uld be distributed across the datanodes and where should the replication co= pies should go ? Lets say=2C I have a file of 640 MB and a cluster with 5 datanodes and conf= igured the block size to be 64 MB. How will this be distributed ?=20 Regards Syed Wasti > From: awittenauer@linkedin.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Data Block Size ? > Date: Thu=2C 15 Jul 2010 18:49:04 +0000 >=20 >=20 > On Jul 15=2C 2010=2C at 11:40 AM=2C Syed Wasti wrote: >=20 > > Will it matter what the data block size is ?=20 >=20 > Yes. >=20 > > It is recommended to have a block size of 64 MB=2C but if we want to ha= ve the data block size to 128 MB=2C should this effect the performance ? >=20 > Yes. >=20 > FWIW=2C we run with 128MB. >=20 > > Does the size of the map jobs created on each datanodes in anyway depen= d the block size ? >=20 > Yes. >=20 > Unless told otherwise=2C Hadoop will generally use the # of maps =3D=3D #= of blocks. So if you have fewer blocks to process=2C you'll have fewer ma= ps to do more work. This is not necessarily a bad thing=3B it all depends = upon your workload=2C size of grid=2C etc. >=20 = --_205c9cf3-1b6f-44e2-ae6d-45613cebdf73_-- From general-return-1822-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 15 20:44:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39311 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 20:44:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 20:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2480 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 20:44:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2361 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 20:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2346 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 20:44:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:44:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:44:41 +0000 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so211703ywe.35 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.17.205 with SMTP id t13mr14367qaa.216.1279226611210; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.40.19 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop World 2010 - Call for Speakers From: John Kreisa To: general Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f93e0febf9e4f048b732723 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f93e0febf9e4f048b732723 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Hadoop Fans, We are currently seeking submissions for Hadoop World which returns to NYC on October 12th. We want to build on last years success and have added more tracks and more sessions so there are more speaking opportunities. We have had a few requests to extend the submission deadline so we wanted to let everyone know we are accepting proposals until August 2nd. You'll find more details here: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-world-nyc We look forward to hearing from you, John -- John Kreisa VP Marketing Cloudera phone: +1 (408) 425 7600 blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera web: www.cloudera.com --00c09f93e0febf9e4f048b732723-- From general-return-1823-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 18:07:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61189 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 18:07:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 18:07:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 74738 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 18:07:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73917 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 18:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73904 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 18:07:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:07:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:07:01 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] (tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.120.91]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o6GI4uIY095556 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=a+MkKLeXWxBcmg1SAY2W9ITI/WMR1KLQUSI96mpW0WrVhvvsQwypbpoiYE6m95d1 Message-Id: <4F3AA93C-56A0-4465-B945-00B501321AC0@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Chukwa moving out of Hadoop Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:04:56 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, As part of Chukwa's migration from Hadoop to incubator, I've moved the subversion over to incubator. Over the next couple weeks, we'll move the web pages, etc. I just didn't want anyone who isn't tracking the chukwa-dev list to get surprised. -- Owen From general-return-1824-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 21:00:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39256 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 21:00:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 21:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 5695 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5475 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5467 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 21:00:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:00:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.18] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:00:30 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279314001-659400290004-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com (sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com [10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id FNOwtNi2uw0Qelw5 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:00:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2529.DB239CD8" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Hadoop and XML Subject: Hadoop and XML Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:00:00 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcslKdrY7z6P57aVRyC7BpzRMKis/g== From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279314002 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.14:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2529.DB239CD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file back into order. Below is the snippet of code.=20 =20 public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { =20 private Text keyText =3D new Text(); private Text valueText =3D new Text(); =20 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } =20 =20 public Text getKeyText() { return keyText; } =20 public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText =3D keyText; } =20 public Text getValueText() { return valueText; } =20 public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText =3D valueText; } =20 private String getXmlKey(String value) { // Get the Key from the XML in the value. } =20 } =20 The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: =20 te> =20 It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed into the method, like below: =20 public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { =20 @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText =3D (Text)key; Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } =20 =20 private String getXmlKey(String value) { // Get the Key from the XML in the value. } =20 } =20 What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in the Text Object: =20 public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { setCapacity(len, false); System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); this.length =3D len; } =20 If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. Could this be the cause of the XML munging? =20 All of this leads me to a few questions: =20 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the shuffle? 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? 3) Does anyone know what is going on? 4) Is this a bug? =20 Thanks, =20 Peter=20 =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2529.DB239CD8-- From general-return-1825-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 21:31:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50382 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 21:31:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 21:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 39820 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39753 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39745 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 21:31:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:31:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:31:05 +0000 Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so1824260pwj.35 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kc5fvUIHLHqCE5/MScLL6vEN1/uBxojICmk1w9LUfoM=; b=xz78ZbJGHVLyS5HHphP/tuk2Ce1rB42ziMbFMpghizcLbBxtLEEE1tr0uvmpX+3Sr/ lXCOqBoJ9OUMNr5g8OngNrQXuVwveY3ZNph/0bbpDgBLVizMKyelezWyYxDIPimES81g dZ7hvO5EIAmaqnUNdgQSlswHbrs0IFpRru1sQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=p+MehNS/MpS6pDgUnRqsTnkqsAHbwL9eQuMkFw9yZz6cbqKjoWhyFkr42mARw2Ds0c l6MpQ3YfuyrIr5Qf3yfGcRr4BJA2Lhy0tQzEwAPZek+PmQba3pSctoAg3aqgU3dDit7r pYcWP/DSDf4gv8V7wkPK85LZ/TdaH8MVryVmQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.147.7 with SMTP id u7mr2178296wfd.217.1279315783189; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.187.10 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:29:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:59:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Soumya Banerjee To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2281ed00b72048b87eac2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2281ed00b72048b87eac2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map method(method lacal) ? Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. map() { private Text keyText = new Text(); private Text valueText = new Text(); //rest of the code } Soumya. On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a MapReduce > Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within the XML > snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as the Value) > to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file back into order. > Below is the snippet of code. > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { > Text valueText = (Text)value; > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > getKeyText().set(keyString); > getValueText().set(valueString); > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); > } > > > public Text getKeyText() { > return keyText; > } > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { > this.keyText = keyText; > } > > > public Text getValueText() { > return valueText; > } > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { > this.valueText = valueText; > } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the map() > method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out information > for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map phase and the > Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > te> > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key and > Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the data > within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not have > different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed into the > method, like below: > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { > Text keyText = (Text)key; > Text valueText = (Text)value; > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > keyText.set(keyString); > valueText.set(valueString); > output.collect(keyText, valueText); > } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in > the Text Object: > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > setCapacity(len, false); > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > this.length = len; > } > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first 500 > from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. Could > this be the cause of the XML munging? > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within a > MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > shuffle? > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > 4) Is this a bug? > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > --000e0cd2281ed00b72048b87eac2-- From general-return-1826-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 21:49:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55675 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 21:48:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 21:48:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 58729 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58644 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58635 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 21:48:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:48:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.19] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:48:51 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279316905-77a055df0002-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com (corpmail.mygazoo.com [10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id YJblYLP8wlki6DJB for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:48:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2530.96664D62" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Hadoop and XML Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:44:18 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcslLje2Q6DQ1fmUQ6eYG3y1yEV9+QAAdMi6 References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: corpmail.mygazoo.com[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279316907 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.13:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2530.96664D62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your = second question correctly: "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map = method(method lacal) ?" In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. Below is the class that runs the Job. public class HadoopJobClient { private static final Log LOGGER =3D = LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); =09 public static void main(String[] args) { JobConf conf =3D new JobConf(Prds.class); =09 conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); =09 conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); // Run the job try { JobClient.runJob(conf); } catch (IOException e) { LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); } } =09 =09 } -----Original Message----- From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML =20 Hi, Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map = method(method lacal) ? Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. map() { private Text keyText =3D new Text(); private Text valueText =3D new Text(); //rest of the code } Soumya. On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a = MapReduce > Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within the XML > snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as the Value) > to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file back into = order. > Below is the snippet of code. > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); > getKeyText().set(keyString); > getValueText().set(valueString); > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); > } > > > public Text getKeyText() { > return keyText; > } > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { > this.keyText =3D keyText; > } > > > public Text getValueText() { > return valueText; > } > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { > this.valueText =3D valueText; > } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the = map() > method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out = information > for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map phase and the > Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > te> > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key = and > Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the data > within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not have > different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed into the > method, like below: > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { > Text keyText =3D (Text)key; > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); > keyText.set(keyString); > valueText.set(valueString); > output.collect(keyText, valueText); > } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in > the Text Object: > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > setCapacity(len, false); > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > this.length =3D len; > } > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first = 500 > from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. Could > this be the cause of the XML munging? > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within = a > MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > shuffle? > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > 4) Is this a bug? > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2530.96664D62-- From general-return-1827-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 21:52:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56480 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 21:52:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 21:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 64059 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63998 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 21:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63990 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 21:52:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.19] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:52:50 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279317149-77a056810001-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com (corpmail.mygazoo.com [10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id a0egHRybD8HoBPgt for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Hadoop and XML Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:51:39 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcslLje2Q6DQ1fmUQ6eYG3y1yEV9+QAAdMi6AAAyKqA= References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: corpmail.mygazoo.com[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279317149 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.13:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a valid point? =20 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your second question correctly: "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map method(method lacal) ?" In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. Below is the class that runs the Job. public class HadoopJobClient { private static final Log LOGGER =3D LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); =09 public static void main(String[] args) { JobConf conf =3D new JobConf(Prds.class); =09 conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); =09 conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); // Run the job try { JobClient.runJob(conf); } catch (IOException e) { LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); } } =09 =09 } -----Original Message----- From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML =20 Hi, Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map method(method lacal) ? Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. map() { private Text keyText =3D new Text(); private Text valueText =3D new Text(); //rest of the code } Soumya. On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a=20 > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within=20 > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as=20 > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file back into order. > Below is the snippet of code. > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D = (Text)value; > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); =20 > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); =20 > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); =20 > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > public Text getKeyText() { > return keyText; > } > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText =3D keyText; } > > > public Text getValueText() { > return valueText; > } > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText =3D=20 > valueText; } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the=20 > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out=20 > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map=20 > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > te> > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key=20 > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the=20 > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not=20 > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed=20 > into the method, like below: > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText =3D (Text)key; =20 > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new=20 > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D=20 > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); =20 > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting=20 > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the=20 > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the=20 > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in > the Text Object: > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > setCapacity(len, false); > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > this.length =3D len; > } > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a=20 > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first=20 > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. =20 > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the=20 > shuffle? > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > 4) Is this a bug? > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > From general-return-1828-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 16 22:10:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64279 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 22:10:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 22:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 76122 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 22:10:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76070 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 22:10:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76062 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 22:10:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:10:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.18] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:10:16 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279318178-4d7700290001-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com ([10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id oYkoEyk8nHoW6jS1 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:09:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2533.8B8049BA" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Hadoop and XML Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:07:56 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcslLje2Q6DQ1fmUQ6eYG3y1yEV9+QAAdMi6AAAyKqAAAKE0kA== References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279318178 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.14:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2533.8B8049BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: vateRateSet> public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, = Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); Text returnKeyText =3D new Text(); Text returnValueText =3D new Text(); returnKeyText.set(keyString); returnValueText.set(valueString); output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } -----Original Message----- From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML =20 Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a valid point? =20 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your second question correctly: "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map method(method lacal) ?" In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. Below is the class that runs the Job. public class HadoopJobClient { private static final Log LOGGER =3D LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); =09 public static void main(String[] args) { JobConf conf =3D new JobConf(Prds.class); =09 conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); =09 conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); // Run the job try { JobClient.runJob(conf); } catch (IOException e) { LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); } } =09 =09 } -----Original Message----- From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML =20 Hi, Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map method(method lacal) ? Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. map() { private Text keyText =3D new Text(); private Text valueText =3D new Text(); //rest of the code } Soumya. On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a=20 > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within=20 > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as=20 > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file back into order. > Below is the snippet of code. > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D = (Text)value; > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); =20 > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); =20 > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); =20 > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > public Text getKeyText() { > return keyText; > } > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText =3D keyText; } > > > public Text getValueText() { > return valueText; > } > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText =3D=20 > valueText; } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the=20 > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out=20 > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map=20 > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > te> > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key=20 > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the=20 > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not=20 > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed=20 > into the method, like below: > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText =3D (Text)key; =20 > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new=20 > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D=20 > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); =20 > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > } > > } > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting=20 > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the=20 > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the=20 > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in > the Text Object: > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > setCapacity(len, false); > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > this.length =3D len; > } > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a=20 > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first=20 > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. =20 > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the=20 > shuffle? > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > 4) Is this a bug? > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2533.8B8049BA-- From general-return-1829-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 17 04:44:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53296 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2010 04:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2010 04:44:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 45120 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2010 04:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44705 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2010 04:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44697 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2010 04:44:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:44:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:44:17 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so1341398qwd.35 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:43:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9uylSC+BenIg0k0i3HYEbDmdOLamq3y0kGKLHTRnraE=; b=p6dKPorP+LsnF/ApbYAjaFlS0wTva1BmoW+gWxd2wydWOgShebLJwUGsNEbfPFpIQQ dixQLeZOZ1Y6rvk/p6Bl2e8obn6/ygPbRuMYPMSVYd6/TZ8HcMVPP27JLNkkVwqnJxHb BO1vVGqkDkV1dtPE73/tUDdDZUV06BkPXITLc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ecpfYzQeePkNyHHy0TKtHg5YEXSBB/hUN02mslA+LuP7AS/nY/DNM4jYv8pw0JD9Ia 8PkJOJoUGkSmxN18NCHNHh1T34ZWULMeBBYudzkFp13QtXI0hctfP+cpqJ43tTQLya5M WGtGn48JDBnglxHhMliOvXCtiBc33SqKWr6eg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.65.80 with SMTP id h16mr1680068qai.101.1279341834707; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:43:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:43:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8e5b8f9aaa3b048b8dfb67 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f8e5b8f9aaa3b048b8dfb67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From an earlier post: http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > vateRateSet> > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, Reporter > reporter) throws IOException { > Text valueText = (Text)value; > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), > "UTF-8"); > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > returnValueText.set(valueString); > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); > } > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a valid > point? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your > second question correctly: > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > method(method lacal) ?" > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > private static final Log LOGGER = > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > public static void main(String[] args) { > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); > > // Run the job > try { > JobClient.runJob(conf); > } catch (IOException e) { > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > } > > } > > > } > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > Hi, > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > method(method > lacal) ? > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > map() > { > private Text keyText = new Text(); > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > //rest of the code > } > > Soumya. > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file > back into order. > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = (Text)value; > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > return keyText; > > } > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = keyText; } > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > return valueText; > > } > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > valueText; } > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > } > > > > } > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > > > > te> > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed > > into the method, like below: > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = (Text)key; > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > } > > > > } > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method in > > > the Text Object: > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > setCapacity(len, false); > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > this.length = len; > > } > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format within > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > > shuffle? > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > --00c09f8e5b8f9aaa3b048b8dfb67-- From general-return-1830-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 15:02:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83281 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 15:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 15:02:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 49091 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 15:02:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48983 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 15:02:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48975 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 15:02:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:02:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.18] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:01:58 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279551697-505a000e0001-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com (sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com [10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id Gg3gPmKJZxFUPjFw for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:01:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Hadoop and XML Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:01:35 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: Acslar6i5AAclaPBQQ6y7iOQiqwm+wB5Qqgg References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279551697 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.14:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is not the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase.=20 BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, StreamXmlRecordReader took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, XmlInputFormat was under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) =20 -----Original Message----- From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML >From an earlier post: http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > vateRateSet> > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > Reporter > reporter) throws IOException { > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), = > "UTF-8"); > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); > Text returnKeyText =3D new Text(); > Text returnValueText =3D new Text(); > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > returnValueText.set(valueString); > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I=20 > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the=20 > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a=20 > valid point? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your=20 > second question correctly: > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map=20 > method(method lacal) ?" > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > private static final Log LOGGER =3D=20 > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > public static void main(String[] args) { > JobConf conf =3D new JobConf(Prds.class); > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new=20 > Path(args[1])); > > // Run the job > try { > JobClient.runJob(conf); > } catch (IOException e) { > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > } > > } > > > } > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > Hi, > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map=20 > method(method > lacal) ? > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > map() > { > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > //rest of the code > } > > Soumya. > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo <=20 > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a=20 > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as=20 > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file > back into order. > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D=20 > > (Text)value; > > > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8");=20 > > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString);=20 > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString);=20 > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > return keyText; > > } > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText =3D keyText; = } > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > return valueText; > > } > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText =3D=20 > > valueText; } > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > } > > > > } > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out=20 > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > > > > te> > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the=20 > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed=20 > > into the method, like below: > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output,=20 > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText =3D (Text)key; = > > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new=20 > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D=20 > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString);=20 > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > } > > > > } > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method=20 > > in > > > the Text Object: > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > setCapacity(len, false); > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > this.length =3D len; > > } > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first=20 > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format=20 > > within > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the=20 > > shuffle? > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > From general-return-1831-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 16:08:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11651 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 16:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 16:08:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 39305 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 16:08:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39237 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 16:08:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39229 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 16:08:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:08:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:08:42 +0000 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so640586ywe.35 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:08:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=30f1K7u7SWWYUWonVNtUmFpCDcDFh3HKeFqNFpd+cHw=; b=YZsLz3o4QIfRjSEF6A2hOeCdcjr1hwzQOhmbUo7klusioZx9yN/GwOi6eXKyIzcazF aylj/cFiAlf7r8Dh8sVP7Ck+B7rXyPiIxNmLHhIHfEcvfbFiZQ+PM6J443dicMR1BlE/ KbOy3VTFW78CZyDLXB1GFubwd5px+mK5Smaic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YdlfZXI98VRgzzb5khXOPrWVL/494qPLbFB95lK5wrx/rxh4fIx0Iiky/CyGfknNlm EyB5SmF3eyiHl8Cwq84qdGgOhKZSRmr/QGQxczwU+OkL2u7yJUc1r8eDM2gyqOzO8YFb dj2sG+7pvRLkjfw25d/qj4L8sXLK8ciBJ74Jk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.38.4 with SMTP id l4mr993490anl.134.1279555699661; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.4.24 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:08:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e640d3d2f2de30048bbfc6e0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e640d3d2f2de30048bbfc6e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For your initial question on Text.set(). Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is false, old data wouldn't be copied over. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is not > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase. > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, StreamXmlRecordReader > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, XmlInputFormat was > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > From an earlier post: > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > Reporter > > reporter) throws IOException { > > Text valueText = (Text)value; > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), > > "UTF-8"); > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a > > valid point? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your > > second question correctly: > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > method(method lacal) ?" > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > Path(args[1])); > > > > // Run the job > > try { > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > } catch (IOException e) { > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > } > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > method(method > > lacal) ? > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > > > map() > > { > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > //rest of the code > > } > > > > Soumya. > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file > > back into order. > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = > > > (Text)value; > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > return keyText; > > > } > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = keyText; } > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > return valueText; > > > } > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = (Text)key; > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method > > > in > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > this.length = len; > > > } > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format > > > within > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > > > shuffle? > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e640d3d2f2de30048bbfc6e0-- From general-return-1832-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 18:22:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44661 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 18:22:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27874 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27811 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27803 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:22:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.21] (HELO col0-omc1-s11.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:22:23 +0000 Received: from COL117-W14 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s11.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:22:01 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_79691937-4b13-4ad4-87fc-0d0ab86a3fb1_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: Dynamic counters in Hadoop M/R jobs... Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:22:02 -0500 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2010 18:22:01.0740 (UTC) FILETIME=[484314C0:01CB276F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_79691937-4b13-4ad4-87fc-0d0ab86a3fb1_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C In looking at "The Definitive Guide" pgs 211-218 looking at the documentat= ion for counters have a question about how to use the dynamic (String=2C String) methods to create/access counters. Looking at the IdentityTableMap class=2C the following map() method exists(= ): public void map(ImmutableBytesWritable key=2C RowResult value=2C org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCollector output=2C org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Reporter reporter) throws IOExceptionThis method is deprecated in 20.5 So how can you get the Reporter so you can use the 'reporter.incrCounter(St= ring group=2CString counter=2C long amount)' method. (See pg 214 code fragment)=20 I must be missing something. Thx -Mike =20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hot= mail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=3Dmultiaccount&ocid=3DP= ID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4= --_79691937-4b13-4ad4-87fc-0d0ab86a3fb1_-- From general-return-1833-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 18:22:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44731 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 18:22:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29004 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28946 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28938 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 18:22:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:22:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msilva@specificmedia.com designates 208.65.144.82 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.65.144.82] (HELO p02c11o149.mxlogic.net) (208.65.144.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:22:27 +0000 Received: from unknown [206.82.192.117] (EHLO p02c11o149.mxlogic.net) by p02c11o149.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.7.0-0) with ESMTP id ec7944c4.4d74f940.17399.00-596.41956.p02c11o149.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:22:06 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4c4497ce1102db40-e8ac709177645ec1f2576d9acae5d6ac2d5d9714 Received: from unknown [206.82.192.117] by p02c11o149.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.7.0-0) with SMTP id e87944c4.0.16074.00-390.41449.p02c11o149.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:22:02 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4c4497ca375c720a-a71f418326d3d46bbd85a9aea96283c7d8cfb899 Received: from west-corp-ex02.specificmedia.local ([192.168.251.16]) by WEST-CORP-EX01.specificmedia.local ([192.168.251.15]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:19:26 -0700 From: Matias Silva To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:19:26 -0700 Subject: Hive Returns Empty Results Thread-Topic: Hive Returns Empty Results Thread-Index: AcsnbuvKJUMrbgyvSE6JxrJ1xnL/IA== Message-ID: <1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2@west-corp-ex02.specificmedia.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2westcorpex02s_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010070601)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [206.82.192.117] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=YpQMAEZSN0BV7U5AHc4XUw==:17 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=DRd3HSgQ8n8vC0nKMRcA:9 a=MucCq7ZUDrmT8o1dJzFEpNStuRQA:4 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Y2VNeNrzAAAA:8 a=yMhM] X-AnalysisOut: [jlubAAAA:8 a=TW66zc2HAAAA:8 a=HQ31llbKAAAA:8 a=V2BWb4iUXoc] X-AnalysisOut: [h7CQ8JaQA:9 a=Scua6usYcg9TCaPIwGkA:7 a=tUJzjhdtsylBKWY9jOm] X-AnalysisOut: [eqyna1QIA:4] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2westcorpex02s_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everyone, my hive interactive shell query returns with empty results whe= n there should be some results. I noticed this from time to time. Has this happened to anybody? and if so what can I do to resolve = it assuming that you have resolved the issue. I'm using hadoop-hive-0.4.1+14.5-1 Thanks for your time and knowledge. Best, Matt --_000_1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2westcorpex02s_-- From general-return-1834-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 20:32:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88572 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 20:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 20:32:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27027 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 20:32:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26971 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 20:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26963 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 20:32:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:32:37 +0000 Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jqwK1e0061zF43QAEwYFNU; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:32:15 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jwY61e00L2SbwD58kwY9G8; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:32:13 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2@west-corp-ex02.specificmedia.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hive Returns Empty Results Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:32:06 -0700 References: <1D39027E38D41B4C91702F159EF19160253914A9C2@west-corp-ex02.specificmedia.local> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Matias Silva wrote: > Hi Everyone, my hive interactive shell query returns with empty > results when there should be some results. I noticed this from time > to time. Has this happened to anybody? and if so what can I do to > resolve it assuming that you have resolved the > issue. General is for announcements that cross all of the sub-projects. Please move this over to hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Thanks, Owen From general-return-1835-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 19 20:54:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95422 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2010 20:54:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2010 20:54:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 54732 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 20:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54651 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2010 20:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54643 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2010 20:54:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zookog@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:54:21 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so2912879qyk.14 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KqLVIIMXi0bhnZTXH6zfl337QZLcwXDsHLCJ8lgJrUY=; b=sD6uCNQzyia57sgbz4c7htOVlnOhYzeTVZ8Ueb7bP0H1nlHxkyb+FTz2Bmuq5aLzJE +JqOVzF1iAm+iNakAKB5HF2GPtVsjrlHDCAWRoH5CNBvwPlkW+U1L/mr/vXPrRHNGsLa nAu3MqQuTGyDkOcoiDnc0bN8YmBkbxcrLd/1E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R9iUtKXiCRh0aIvpAepzoyh5dyBpkvD5WCeT5lBd5DeEEMZ+UdtPWogd9xdZphRIPa OkL7uaNEYRRfpZm4C3uOYR/y85z88WYltelSgXPhLfTFJjr3S+TDOVIl6szXBClVwBUZ KM8lQaZdVBWv+GI4mV8m+DeSERNxmTB+W5Eiw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.40.207 with SMTP id l15mr5321934qae.224.1279572780378; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: zookog@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.181.80 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:53:00 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FZAYzsE2jKzLjCHki4mmOfK752A Message-ID: Subject: ANNOUNCING Tahoe, the Least-Authority File System, v1.7.1 From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks: Tahoe-LAFS is a secure, distributed filesystem that can be used as an alternate filesystem to HDFS, as described in these slides [1] and implemented in this project named hadoop-lafs. We just released v1.7.1 of Tahoe-LAFS. Here is the release announcement. If you try it out then by all means let us know what you think! Regards, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn [1] http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=3D0B9iCsXQ_HuEpN2NlNDgwMTMtNWRjOC00Y= zMwLWExYjMtYzVmM2FiZGRhNjA4&hl=3Den&pli=3D1 [2] http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-lafs ANNOUNCING Tahoe, the Least-Authority File System, v1.7.1 The Tahoe-LAFS team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of version 1.7.1 of Tahoe-LAFS, an extremely reliable distributed storage system. Tahoe-LAFS is the first distributed storage system which offers "provider-independent security"=E2=80=94meaning that not even the operators of your storage servers can read or alter your data without your consent. Here is the one-page explanation of its unique security and fault-tolerance properties: http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/about.html Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1 is the successor to v1.7.0, which was released June 18, 2010 [1]. v1.7.1 is a stable minor release which adds several bugfixes and improvements in security, forward-compatibility, packaging, usability, and portability. See the NEWS file [2] for details. WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? With Tahoe-LAFS, you distribute your filesystem across multiple servers, and even if some of the servers are compromised by by an attacker, the entire filesystem continues to work correctly, and continues to preserve your privacy and security. You can easily share specific files and directories with other people. In addition to the core storage system itself, volunteers have built other projects on top of Tahoe-LAFS and have integrated Tahoe-LAFS with existing systems. These include frontends for Windows, Macintosh, JavaScript, iPhone, and Android, and plugins for Hadoop, bzr, mercurial, duplicity, TiddlyWiki, and more. See the Related Projects page on the wiki [3]. We believe that strong cryptography, Free and Open Source Software, erasure coding, and principled engineering practices make Tahoe-LAFS safer than RAID, removable drive, tape, on-line backup or "cloud storage" systems. This software is developed under test-driven development, and there are no known bugs or security flaws which would compromise confidentiality or data integrity under recommended use. (For all currently known issues please see the known_issues.txt file [4].) COMPATIBILITY This release is fully compatible with the version 1 series of Tahoe-LAFS. Clients from this release can write files and directories in the format used by clients of all versions back to v1.0 (which was released March 25, 2008). Clients from this release can read files and directories produced by clients of all versions since v1.0. Servers from this release can serve clients of all versions back to v1.0 and clients from this release can use servers of all versions back to v1.0. This is the tenth release in the version 1 series. This series of Tahoe-LAFS will be actively supported and maintained for the forseeable future, and future versions of Tahoe-LAFS will retain the ability to read and write files compatible with this series. LICENCE You may use this package under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or, at your option, any later version. See the file "COPYING.GPL" [5] for the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2. You may use this package under the Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, version 1 or, at your option, any later version. (The Transitive Grace Period Public Licence has requirements similar to the GPL except that it allows you to delay for up to twelve months after you redistribute a derived work before releasing the source code of your derived work.) See the file "COPYING.TGPPL.html" [6] for the terms of the Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, version 1. (You may choose to use this package under the terms of either licence, at your option.) INSTALLATION Tahoe-LAFS works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Cygwin, Solaris, *BSD, and probably most other systems. Start with "docs/quickstart.html" [7]. HACKING AND COMMUNITY Please join us on the mailing list [8]. Patches are gratefully accepted -- the RoadMap page [9] shows the next improvements that we plan to make and CREDITS [10] lists the names of people who've contributed to the project. The Dev page [11] contains resources for hackers. SPONSORSHIP Tahoe-LAFS was originally developed by Allmydata, Inc., a provider of commercial backup services. After discontinuing funding of Tahoe-LAFS R&D in early 2009, they have continued to provide servers, bandwidth, small personal gifts as tokens of appreciation, and bug reports. Thank you to Allmydata, Inc. for their generous and public-spirited support. Google, Inc. is sponsoring Tahoe-LAFS development as part of the Google Summer of Code 2010. Google suggested that we should apply for the Summer of Code program, and when we did they generously awarded four sponsorships to students from around the world to hack on Tahoe-LAFS this summer. Thank you to Google, Inc. for their generous and public-spirited support. HACK TAHOE-LAFS! If you can find a security flaw in Tahoe-LAFS which is serious enough that feel compelled to warn our users and issue a fix, then we will award you with a customized t-shirts with your exploit printed on it and add you to the "Hack Tahoe-LAFS Hall Of Fame" [12]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This is the fifth release of Tahoe-LAFS to be created solely as a labor of love by volunteers. Thank you very much to the team of "hackers in the public interest" who make Tahoe-LAFS possible. David-Sarah Hopwood and Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn on behalf of the Tahoe-LAFS team July 18, 2010 Rainhill, Merseyside, UK and Boulder, Colorado, USA [1] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/browser/relnotes.txt?rev=3D4514 [2] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/browser/NEWS?rev=3D4577 [3] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/RelatedProjects [4] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/browser/docs/known_issues.txt [5] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/browser/COPYING.GPL [6] http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe/trunk/COPYING.TGPPL.html [7] http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/quickstart.html [8] http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev [9] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/roadmap [10] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/browser/CREDITS?rev=3D4567 [11] http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/Dev [12] http://tahoe-lafs.org/hacktahoelafs/ From general-return-1836-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 00:12:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76391 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 00:12:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 00:12:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 81144 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 00:12:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81077 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 00:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81069 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 00:12:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:12:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:12:01 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so7550160iwn.35 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:10:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1NnwWjc1q7tZncQx71TgwgWvfO6P7+oIhH/Z9tZbXbU=; b=piYwXLQTBQTVfZkDfNIzvEvWK+Sn2lzyiZqygOtxvI3svm80hlMg5eRMQ62a8HsIvE uxlz4P0soknhXy+GSzbHLUlWUKAIbbGjTu3RPN4dFexaK1zek20y951jeFnnqw8vg1wE 74Fe6qrIL2uKnHSGfLWPquMsj9AAS531h5umU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ac78QtxyK1oX+QkIMlpdAYZYzRWiiVEF/WGYBBMpAXsJMLS+0FPRnNuNOXPKF2y5Am 548e9FMTij72SBlSZ5CSia2UrMolvcWj+KTIjsBG5sDM2titRCatlYDiKfl1JptSIHOG Cer0gOs4NXeDmhIefMku/SjT83xk4ibQIpNHo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.34.135 with SMTP id l7mr6618360ibd.148.1279584639737; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: anthony.urso@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.17.202 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:10:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:10:39 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9JyOE-duyhLr-h_k1lxjK90DZms Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dynamic counters in Hadoop M/R jobs... From: Anthony Urso To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The new Mapper class passes a Map.Context object to the map() method. >From this you can get a StatusReporter object which can produce a named Counter object and increment it. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduc= e/Mapper.Context.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduc= e/StatusReporter.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduc= e/Counter.html Alternatively, the old APIs are supposed to be temporarily de-deprecated in the next stable release, so you can use them as described by that book. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Michael Segel wrote: > > Hi, > > In looking at "The Definitive Guide" =A0pgs 211-218 looking at the docume= ntation for counters have a question about how to use the > > dynamic (String, String) methods to create/access counters. > > Looking at the IdentityTableMap class, the following map() method exists(= ): > public void map(ImmutableBytesWritable key, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RowResult value, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCollector output, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Reporter reporter= ) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 throws IOExceptionThis method is deprecated in 20.5 > > So how can you get the Reporter so you can use the 'reporter.incrCounter(= String group,String counter, long amount)' > method. (See pg 214 code fragment) > > I must be missing something. > > Thx > > -Mike > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with H= otmail. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=3Dmultiaccount&ocid= =3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4 From general-return-1837-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 01:57:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22082 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 01:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 01:57:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 62023 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 01:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61981 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 01:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61973 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 01:57:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:57:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.159] (HELO e38.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:56:57 +0000 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6K1nY6S015477 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:49:34 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o6K1uaiK104252 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:56:36 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o6K1uaLF030574 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:56:36 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o6K1uaxu030571 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:56:36 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Austin Hadoop User Group July Meeting - 7/22 X-KeepSent: D0AEE89B:632ECFDE-86257766:0008E85D; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:56:34 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 07/19/2010 19:56:35, Serialize complete at 07/19/2010 19:56:35 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000AABBA86257766_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 000AABBA86257766_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks For those of you who will be in the Austin, Texas this coming Thursday, we are having a joint meetup with the Semantic Web Austin group. Our two speakers will present on topics that address both Big Data and Semantic Analysis. Our meetings are: 1) Awesome 2) Catered 3) Provide a great to chance to hear about what is going on with Big Data in Texas. I hope to see you out there - http://austinhug.blogspot.com/2010/06/july-meeting.html Regards Steve Watt --=_alternative 000AABBA86257766_=-- From general-return-1838-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 02:02:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23219 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 02:02:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 02:02:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 70069 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 02:02:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70007 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 02:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69999 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 02:02:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:20 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o6K1bk3v029735 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:37:46 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6305647F6885 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:58:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id FHAxFdiwDztaRfAy for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:58:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o6K1wn5W000582 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:58:49 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:58:49 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:58:47 -0500 Subject: RE: Dynamic counters in Hadoop M/R jobs... Thread-Topic: Dynamic counters in Hadoop M/R jobs... Thread-Index: AcsnoDI6be7U+cKKSqeUfaaJFVRQ6QACJOZQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org VGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUgcmVwbHkuDQoNCkdvdCBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBxdWVzdGlvbnMuLi4NCg0K SSBzYXcgdGhhdCBJIGNvdWxkIGdldCB0aGUgU3RhdHVzUmVwb3J0ZXIgZnJvbSB0aGUgTWFwcGVy LkNvbnRleHQuDQpCdXQgdGhlIEFQSSBkb2Vzbid0IGhhdmUgYSB3YXkgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSBTdGF0 dXNSZXBvcnQgZnJvbSB0aGUgTWFwcGVyLkNvbnRleHQuDQoNCklmIHlvdSdyZSBnb2luZyB0byBn byB0byB0aGUgTWFwcGVyLkNvbnRleHQgeW91IGNhbiBnZXQgdGhlIGNvdW50ZXJzLg0KQW5kIHlv dSBoYXZlIGEgZ2V0Q291bnRlcihTdHJpbmcsIFN0cmluZykuIFRoZW4geW91IGNhbiBhbHdheXMg aW5jcmVtZW50IGl0Lg0KDQpCdXQgdGhpcyBraW5kIG9mIGJlZ3MgYSBxdWVzdGlvbiB3aGljaCBp c24ndCBkb2N1bWVudGVkLi4uDQoNCklmIEkgaGF2ZSBhIG1hcHBlci5Db250ZXh0IGFuZCBJIHNh eSBnZXRDb3VudGVyKCJGb28iLCJGb29iYXIgQ291bnQiKTsNCldoYXQgaGFwcGVucyBpZiB0aGVy ZSBpc24ndCBhIGNvdW50ZXIgKCJGb28iLCJGb29iYXIgQ291bnQiKSA/DQoNCldoYXQgSSBtZWFu IGlzIGhvdyBkbyB5b3UgYWRkIGEgZHluYW1pYyBjb3VudGVyIG9yIGlmIEkgYXNrIGZvciBhIGNv dW50ZXIgdGhhdCBkb2Vzbid0IGFscmVhZHkgZXhpc3QsIHdpbGwgaXQgY3JlYXRlIGl0Pw0KKFRo aXMgaXNuJ3QgZG9jdW1lbnRlZC4uLiBhbmQgaXRzIG5vdCBzYWZlIHRvIGFzc3VtZSBhbnl0aGlu Zy4pDQoNClNvcnJ5LCBidXQgZHluYW1pYyBjb3VudGVycyBpc24ndCByZWFsbHkgd2VsbCBkb2N1 bWVudGVkLg0KDQotTWlrZQ0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogYW50 aG9ueS51cnNvQGdtYWlsLmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOmFudGhvbnkudXJzb0BnbWFpbC5jb21dIE9uIEJl aGFsZiBPZiBBbnRob255IFVyc28NClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgSnVseSAxOSwgMjAxMCA3OjExIFBN DQpUbzogZ2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IER5bmFtaWMgY291 bnRlcnMgaW4gSGFkb29wIE0vUiBqb2JzLi4uDQoNClRoZSBuZXcgTWFwcGVyIGNsYXNzIHBhc3Nl cyBhIE1hcC5Db250ZXh0IG9iamVjdCB0byB0aGUgbWFwKCkgbWV0aG9kLg0KRnJvbSB0aGlzIHlv dSBjYW4gZ2V0IGEgU3RhdHVzUmVwb3J0ZXIgb2JqZWN0ICB3aGljaCAgY2FuIHByb2R1Y2UgYQ0K bmFtZWQgQ291bnRlciBvYmplY3QgYW5kIGluY3JlbWVudCBpdC4NCg0KaHR0cDovL2hhZG9vcC5h cGFjaGUub3JnL2NvbW1vbi9kb2NzL2N1cnJlbnQvYXBpL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvaGFkb29wL21hcHJl ZHVjZS9NYXBwZXIuQ29udGV4dC5odG1sDQpodHRwOi8vaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcvY29tbW9u L2RvY3MvY3VycmVudC9hcGkvb3JnL2FwYWNoZS9oYWRvb3AvbWFwcmVkdWNlL1N0YXR1c1JlcG9y dGVyLmh0bWwNCmh0dHA6Ly9oYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy9jb21tb24vZG9jcy9jdXJyZW50L2Fw aS9vcmcvYXBhY2hlL2hhZG9vcC9tYXByZWR1Y2UvQ291bnRlci5odG1sDQoNCkFsdGVybmF0aXZl bHksIHRoZSBvbGQgQVBJcyBhcmUgc3VwcG9zZWQgdG8gYmUgdGVtcG9yYXJpbHkNCmRlLWRlcHJl Y2F0ZWQgaW4gdGhlIG5leHQgc3RhYmxlIHJlbGVhc2UsIHNvIHlvdSBjYW4gdXNlIHRoZW0gYXMN CmRlc2NyaWJlZCBieSB0aGF0IGJvb2suDQoNCk9uIE1vbiwgSnVsIDE5LCAyMDEwIGF0IDExOjIy IEFNLCBNaWNoYWVsIFNlZ2VsDQo8bWljaGFlbF9zZWdlbEBob3RtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+ DQo+IEhpLA0KPg0KPiBJbiBsb29raW5nIGF0ICJUaGUgRGVmaW5pdGl2ZSBHdWlkZSIgoHBncyAy MTEtMjE4IGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24gZm9yIGNvdW50ZXJzIGhhdmUgYSBx dWVzdGlvbiBhYm91dCBob3cgdG8gdXNlIHRoZQ0KPg0KPiBkeW5hbWljIChTdHJpbmcsIFN0cmlu ZykgbWV0aG9kcyB0byBjcmVhdGUvYWNjZXNzIGNvdW50ZXJzLg0KPg0KPiBMb29raW5nIGF0IHRo ZSBJZGVudGl0eVRhYmxlTWFwIGNsYXNzLCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIG1hcCgpIG1ldGhvZCBleGlz dHMoKToNCj4gcHVibGljIHZvaWQgbWFwKEltbXV0YWJsZUJ5dGVzV3JpdGFibGUga2V5LA0KPiCg IKAgoCCgIKAgoCCgIKBSb3dSZXN1bHQgdmFsdWUsDQo+IKAgoCCgIKAgoCCgIKAgoG9yZy5hcGFj aGUuaGFkb29wLm1hcHJlZC5PdXRwdXRDb2xsZWN0b3I8SW1tdXRhYmxlQnl0ZXNXcml0YWJsZSxS b3dSZXN1bHQ+IG91dHB1dCwNCj4goCCgIKAgoCCgIKAgoCCgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWFw cmVkLlJlcG9ydGVyIHJlcG9ydGVyKQ0KPiCgIKAgoCCgIHRocm93cyBJT0V4Y2VwdGlvblRoaXMg bWV0aG9kIGlzIGRlcHJlY2F0ZWQgaW4gMjAuNQ0KPg0KPiBTbyBob3cgY2FuIHlvdSBnZXQgdGhl IFJlcG9ydGVyIHNvIHlvdSBjYW4gdXNlIHRoZSAncmVwb3J0ZXIuaW5jckNvdW50ZXIoU3RyaW5n IGdyb3VwLFN0cmluZyBjb3VudGVyLCBsb25nIGFtb3VudCknDQo+IG1ldGhvZC4gKFNlZSBwZyAy MTQgY29kZSBmcmFnbWVudCkNCj4NCj4gSSBtdXN0IGJlIG1pc3Npbmcgc29tZXRoaW5nLg0KPg0K PiBUaHgNCj4NCj4gLU1pa2UNCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gVGhlIE5ldyBCdXN5IGlz IG5vdCB0aGUgdG9vIGJ1c3kuIENvbWJpbmUgYWxsIHlvdXIgZS1tYWlsIGFjY291bnRzIHdpdGgg SG90bWFpbC4NCj4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy53aW5kb3dzbGl2ZS5jb20vY2FtcGFpZ24vdGhlbmV3YnVz eT90aWxlPW11bHRpYWNjb3VudCZvY2lkPVBJRDI4MzI2OjpUOldMTVRBR0w6T046V0w6ZW4tVVM6 V01fSE1QOjA0MjAxMF80DQoNCg0KVGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGNvbnRhaW5lZCBpbiB0aGlzIGNv bW11bmljYXRpb24gbWF5IGJlIENPTkZJREVOVElBTCBhbmQgaXMgaW50ZW5kZWQgb25seSBmb3Ig dGhlIHVzZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVjaXBpZW50KHMpIG5hbWVkIGFib3ZlLiAgSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3Qg dGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudCwgeW91IGFyZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQgdGhhdCBhbnkg ZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLCBvciBjb3B5aW5nIG9mIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNh dGlvbiwgb3IgYW55IG9mIGl0cyBjb250ZW50cywgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkgcHJvaGliaXRlZC4gIElm IHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNlIG5v dGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUvZGVzdHJveSB0aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2FnZSBh bmQgYW55IGNvcHkgb2YgaXQgZnJvbSB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyIG9yIHBhcGVyIGZpbGVzLg0K From general-return-1839-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 13:02:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14654 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 13:02:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 13:02:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1894 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 13:01:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1449 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 13:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1441 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 13:01:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:01:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:01:48 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so8352581iwn.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.139 with SMTP id m11mr7248209iby.136.1279630885237; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.184.9 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:01:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Jeff Bean To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Peter Minearo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045013c645bb619048bd148fc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --005045013c645bb619048bd148fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think the problem is here: String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); Javadoc for Text says: *getBytes *() Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to getLength()is valid. So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value returned by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. Jeff On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > For your initial question on Text.set(). > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is false, old > data wouldn't be copied over. > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is not > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase. > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, StreamXmlRecordReader > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, XmlInputFormat was > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > From an earlier post: > > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > Reporter > > > reporter) throws IOException { > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), > > > "UTF-8"); > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't that > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it was > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a > > > valid point? > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your > > > second question correctly: > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > method(method lacal) ?" > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > > Path(args[1])); > > > > > > // Run the job > > > try { > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > } catch (IOException e) { > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > method(method > > > lacal) ? > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > > > > > map() > > > { > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > //rest of the code > > > } > > > > > > Soumya. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from within > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file > > > back into order. > > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = > > > > (Text)value; > > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > > return keyText; > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = keyText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > > return valueText; > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the Map > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For Example: > > > > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the Key > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do not > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed > > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = (Text)key; > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was getting > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at the > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up the > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method > > > > in > > > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > > this.length = len; > > > > } > > > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has a > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format > > > > within > > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > > > > shuffle? > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --005045013c645bb619048bd148fc-- From general-return-1840-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 14:53:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50056 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 14:53:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 14:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 48589 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 14:53:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48153 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 14:53:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48135 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 14:53:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:53:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:53:18 +0000 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so2118515yxm.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:52:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7uUw4miireLQdFD2Ykadz8Juiof+36npLrjTVTi27Cc=; b=cjOYxVXyOpnIuN+5Ed3aWQJxGA1jLbpT5GPzB2rM5zWcJoHI7OEaAZFXFjQLFjZTFg SgPj1Eh4gn+P/hkxVDCVd58N/zay1ZZ5b9bhKOjjeHiGuMK8dMRdXcfExDLSEjjDfRV4 zpU7fDYahwMGt3Aw2LXUMtYzz/enHjWpbZu74= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vXyrX24yG98Pzf/kQqdFRevU1BhF4XT4Kohv2LiBrQwLP0w1vSFFfOuRrCeMA1ILcT u2Y5jHLnn5iLSqujgZgGA7z+tnv/g6KZNh3qFrLK8ZQWuO+kVWY/olB+P31E+1Adu9B4 IU8OQ8ewGIOclN8vpWRT8/IsgqSgLTm1Vg0iM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.25.10 with SMTP id c10mr483719ybj.19.1279637577465; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.197.21 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:52:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Developers sought for web crawling project From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, Disclosure: I have been an active member of the Hadoop / HBase / Hive mailing lists for some time. I am not a recruiter, but looking to increase a development team that I lead. I sincerely apologize if this message is against mailing list etiquette; I have not seen any guidelines forbidding this. We are looking to expand the development team based in Copenhagen, Denmark. We run and operate an indexing system that provides access to biodiversity information, and specifically 100s millions of point based observations of species occurrence documented in the past century. Our live system is outgrowing a MySQL database, and we are already tentatively using Hive, Hadoop and have run some tests using HBase. Over the next 16 months we will rework the whole system, including custom reporting, custom maps and other visualizations, real time search indexes, reducing latency, quality control integration, custom vocabulary work etc. Our final architecture will likely include Hive, Hadoop, HBase, Lucene (SOLR / ElasticSearch?), Sqoop and PostGIS. If you are familiar with these technologies, and the thought of some time working in Europe appeals to you, then we'd love to hear from you. Guidelines for applications are on the advert: http://tinyurl.com/gbif-dev-job Thanks, Tim From general-return-1841-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 15:08:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60215 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 15:08:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 15:08:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 75231 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 15:08:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75093 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 15:08:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75079 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 15:08:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:08:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paliwalashish@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:08:27 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so3437110qyk.14 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LU1Ot8e3HTcOLO6R3xl+iAoOPTNRjkjl9DNE/Ke/vUg=; b=iGIDYPtcLq6jvS/Op0TEhwHhFIJkE1egiP7M3T+xBrQNEMJe6g4A77zKG107eqlo32 2/4fawf5zui2EfDeTOc7xbnrfRfqFsVnLuIhAU+w0jJHOxj9JBj1IvdWEkme96KMH9D/ IBWTjRfzadssx1Nvvq4/dnky9wt8AgSdHADVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T70M9baLMUkpGO/T/sxhytw2YkA8JNT+8mYJpHdSa3tv0qOaWeW0LihamSR4+zgeo+ clS3TqpM7oHC8UWw7lXfSB1t5Cr7YyZE5JCG1gDkg27zXz22DxxzP5E9PRltbzw/ZAFq +wXljihHO1EjOjBmnHLo3NJswhNcbmVhU4mnI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.11 with SMTP id v11mr1027383qad.100.1279638425940; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.80.74 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:37:05 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Developers sought for web crawling project From: Ashish To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tim, You can try jobs@apache.org, its meant for this purpose. Sorry for the noise. I belong to Apache MINA team and just getting started here :) thanks ashish On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Tim Robertson wrote: > Hi all, > > Disclosure: I have been an active member of the Hadoop / HBase / Hive > mailing lists for some time. =A0I am not a recruiter, but looking to > increase a development team that I lead. =A0I sincerely apologize if > this message is against mailing list etiquette; I have not seen any > guidelines forbidding this. > > We are looking to expand the development team based in Copenhagen, > Denmark. =A0We run and operate an indexing system that provides access > to biodiversity information, and specifically 100s millions of point > based observations of species occurrence documented in the past > century. =A0Our live system is outgrowing a MySQL database, and we are > already tentatively using Hive, Hadoop and have run some tests using > HBase. =A0Over the next 16 months we will rework the whole system, > including custom reporting, custom maps and other visualizations, real > time search indexes, reducing latency, quality control integration, > custom vocabulary work etc. =A0Our final architecture will likely > include Hive, Hadoop, HBase, Lucene (SOLR / ElasticSearch?), Sqoop and > PostGIS. =A0If you are familiar with these technologies, and the thought > of some time working in Europe appeals to you, then we'd love to hear > from you. =A0Guidelines for applications are on the advert: > http://tinyurl.com/gbif-dev-job > > Thanks, > Tim > --=20 thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal From general-return-1842-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 15:58:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75803 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 15:58:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 15:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 46114 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 15:58:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46049 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 15:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46041 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 15:58:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:58:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:58:12 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3611254vws.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2WIAlKILISOjTbqdljgotbH+fxY/hmCqcgriq/w88Fg=; b=F2q8AF2RifjU8anuW0u+By47Yp1aiFyIHxDhnvWkwIKYnnFZaw9ekOTAjvhzQ4DzBW bixFDZKn+Wpq3sOI95ahvX7VRw8tc9lZi9lS1UM2dzxd50vJ0iuyWVMkGlDpazgiCakm 46eaarwMLPr6K8DrsfxMNaRJsEr70qMcXsVqo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gfgCJn5Blk13XECfh1aZQQ1FzapueqSRNYrn3893ydRnHE7x0AGd0pNU2gKERfJygS 7bpQe+X2xZrHkvG3pQRDam41M/Z79xbXgHRUrhpd1XRdZuSibl6nGqoNBYuUSuScip9r p4XiL+fJTWuSztzRygobrGnf3M1a5YVhQmpWg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.29.16 with SMTP id o16mr2470901qac.343.1279641410532; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:56:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce054b6f510048bd3bbb5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ce054b6f510048bd3bbb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Interesting. String class is able to handle this scenario: 348 public String(byte[] data, String encoding) throws UnsupportedEncodingException { 349 this(data, 0, data.length, encoding); 350 } On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Jeff Bean wrote: > I think the problem is here: > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > Javadoc for Text says: > > *getBytes< > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getBytes%28%29 > > > *() > Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to > getLength()< > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getLength%28%29 > >is > valid. > > So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value returned > by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. > > Jeff > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > For your initial question on Text.set(). > > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is false, old > > data wouldn't be copied over. > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is not > > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase. > > > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, StreamXmlRecordReader > > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, XmlInputFormat > was > > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > From an earlier post: > > > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > Reporter > > > > reporter) throws IOException { > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), > > > > "UTF-8"); > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > > > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; I > > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't > that > > > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it > was > > > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the > > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a > > > > valid point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand your > > > > second question correctly: > > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > method(method lacal) ?" > > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = > > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new > Path(args[0])); > > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > > > Path(args[1])); > > > > > > > > // Run the job > > > > try { > > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > > } catch (IOException e) { > > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > method(method > > > > lacal) ? > > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > > > > > > > map() > > > > { > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > //rest of the code > > > > } > > > > > > > > Soumya. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from > within > > > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet (as > > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the file > > > > back into order. > > > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = > > > > > (Text)value; > > > > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > > > return keyText; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = keyText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > > > return valueText; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling out > > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the > Map > > > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For > Example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the > Key > > > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is the > > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do > not > > > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones passed > > > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = (Text)key; > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was > getting > > > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at > the > > > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up > the > > > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this method > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > > > this.length = len; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array has > a > > > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the first > > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" alone. > > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during the > > > > > shuffle? > > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0015175ce054b6f510048bd3bbb5-- From general-return-1843-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 16:24:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87708 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 16:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 16:24:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 94825 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:24:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94592 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94584 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 16:24:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:24:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:24:33 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so8515629iwn.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.144 with SMTP id d16mr7694043ibz.160.1279642992094; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.184.9 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Jeff Bean To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045029894fbb717048bd41979 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --005045029894fbb717048bd41979 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 data.length is the length of the byte array. Text.getLength() most likely returns a different value than getBytes.length. Hadoop reuses box class objects like Text, so what it's probably doing is writing over the byte array, lengthening it as necessary, and just updating a separate length attribute. Jeff On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Interesting. > String class is able to handle this scenario: > > 348 public String(byte[] data, String encoding) throws > UnsupportedEncodingException { > 349 this(data, 0, data.length, encoding); > 350 } > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Jeff Bean wrote: > > > I think the problem is here: > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > Javadoc for Text says: > > > > *getBytes< > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getBytes%28%29 > > > > > *() > > Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to > > getLength()< > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getLength%28%29 > > >is > > valid. > > > > So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value > returned > > by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > For your initial question on Text.set(). > > > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is false, > old > > > data wouldn't be copied over. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is > not > > > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase. > > > > > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > > > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, > StreamXmlRecordReader > > > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, XmlInputFormat > > was > > > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > From an earlier post: > > > > > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > > Reporter > > > > > reporter) throws IOException { > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; > > > > > String valueString = new > String(valueText.getBytes(), > > > > > "UTF-8"); > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > > > > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > > > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a suggestion; > I > > > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't > > that > > > > > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; it > > was > > > > > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep the > > > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really a > > > > > valid point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand > your > > > > > second question correctly: > > > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > > method(method lacal) ?" > > > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > > > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > > > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > > > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = > > > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > > > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new > > Path(args[0])); > > > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > > > > Path(args[1])); > > > > > > > > > > // Run the job > > > > > try { > > > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > > > } catch (IOException e) { > > > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > > > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > > method(method > > > > > lacal) ? > > > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task configuration. > > > > > > > > > > map() > > > > > { > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > //rest of the code > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Soumya. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from > > within > > > > > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet > (as > > > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the > file > > > > > back into order. > > > > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > output, > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = > > > > > > (Text)value; > > > > > > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > > > > return keyText; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = keyText; > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > > > > return valueText; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > > > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into the > > > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling > out > > > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between the > > Map > > > > > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For > > Example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of the > > Key > > > > > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is > the > > > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I do > > not > > > > > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones > passed > > > > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > output, > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = > (Text)key; > > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, valueText); > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was > > getting > > > > > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code at > > the > > > > > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks up > > the > > > > > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this > method > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > > > > this.length = len; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array > has > > a > > > > > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the > first > > > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" > alone. > > > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during > the > > > > > > shuffle? > > > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --005045029894fbb717048bd41979-- From general-return-1844-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 16:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91211 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 16:35:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 16:35:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15824 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15763 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15727 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 16:35:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:35:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.18] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:35:42 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279643713-72cf00050002-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com ([10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id pMc3HBqKIx32FxoD for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:35:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2829.83EDDDB8" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Hadoop and XML Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:35:08 -0700 Message-ID: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D055@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D055@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcsoKBBnjGgnGBwyQKK4n7mbbjMtPwAAHghL References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> From: "Peter Minearo" To: X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279643714 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.14:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2829.83EDDDB8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That is exacly what is happening. This is the code from the Text class. public void set(String string) { try { ByteBuffer bb =3D encode(string, true); bytes =3D bb.array(); length =3D bb.limit(); }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened " + = e.toString());=20 } } This sounds like a bug. =20 Let's say you create a Text object and drop in a String that sets the = byte array length to 200. Then drop in a a second String that sets the = byte array length to 500. Since, the new length is greater than the = previous length; the byte array length is reset to the longer length. = Now, if you drop in a third String that would set the byte array length = to 350; the Text object does not replace the byte array with a new = length of 350; it utilizes the greater length of 500 and sets an extra = variable to track the "real" length. =20 So: Text.getBytes().length !=3D Text.getLength() This does 2 things: 1. Passes around more data than what is needed 2. Makes the Text object confusing to work with Text.getBytes().length =3D=3D Text.getLength() - should be the correct = behavior. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Bean [mailto:jwfbean@cloudera.com] Sent: Tue 7/20/2010 9:23 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML =20 data.length is the length of the byte array. Text.getLength() most likely returns a different value than = getBytes.length. Hadoop reuses box class objects like Text, so what it's probably doing = is writing over the byte array, lengthening it as necessary, and just = updating a separate length attribute. Jeff On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Interesting. > String class is able to handle this scenario: > > 348 public String(byte[] data, String encoding) throws > UnsupportedEncodingException { > 349 this(data, 0, data.length, encoding); > 350 } > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Jeff Bean = wrote: > > > I think the problem is here: > > > > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > Javadoc for Text says: > > > > *getBytes< > > > = http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Tex= t.html#getBytes%28%29 > > > > > *() > > Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to > > getLength()< > > > = http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Tex= t.html#getLength%28%29 > > >is > > valid. > > > > So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value > returned > > by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > For your initial question on Text.set(). > > > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is = false, > old > > > data wouldn't be copied over. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase = is > not > > > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce = phase. > > > > > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > > > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, > StreamXmlRecordReader > > > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, = XmlInputFormat > > was > > > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > From an earlier post: > > > > > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector = output, > > > > > Reporter > > > > > reporter) throws IOException { > > > > > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; > > > > > String valueString =3D new > String(valueText.getBytes(), > > > > > "UTF-8"); > > > > > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > Text returnKeyText =3D new Text(); > > > > > Text returnValueText =3D new Text(); > > > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); = } > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a = suggestion; > I > > > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but = wouldn't > > that > > > > > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went = through; it > > was > > > > > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep = the > > > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not = really a > > > > > valid point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I = understand > your > > > > > second question correctly: > > > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the = map > > > > > method(method lacal) ?" > > > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > > > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > > > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > > > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER =3D > > > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > > > > JobConf conf =3D new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > > > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > > > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new > > Path(args[0])); > > > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > > > > Path(args[1])); > > > > > > > > > > // Run the job > > > > > try { > > > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > > > } catch (IOException e) { > > > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > > > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > > method(method > > > > > lacal) ? > > > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task = configuration. > > > > > > > > > > map() > > > > > { > > > > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > > > > > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > //rest of the code > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Soumya. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running = a > > > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key = from > > within > > > > > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML = snippet > (as > > > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort = the > file > > > > > back into order. > > > > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements = Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > > > private Text keyText =3D new Text(); > > > > > > private Text valueText =3D new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > output, > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText =3D > > > > > > (Text)value; > > > > > > > > > > > String valueString =3D new String(valueText.getBytes(), = "UTF-8"); > > > > > > String keyString =3D getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); = getValueText().set(valueString); > > > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > > > > return keyText; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText =3D = keyText; > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > > > > return valueText; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = =3D > > > > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed = into the > > > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just = pulling > out > > > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between = the > > Map > > > > > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For > > Example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of = the > > Key > > > > > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes = is > the > > > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where = I do > > not > > > > > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones > passed > > > > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements = Mapper { > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > output, > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText =3D > (Text)key; > > > > > > Text valueText =3D (Text)value; String valueString =3D new > > > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString =3D > > > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, = valueText); > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was > > getting > > > > > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the = code at > > the > > > > > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase = picks up > > the > > > > > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this > method > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > > > > this.length =3D len; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" = array > has > > a > > > > > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy = the > first > > > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" > alone. > > > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data = format > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used = during > the > > > > > > shuffle? > > > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other = format? > > > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB2829.83EDDDB8-- From general-return-1845-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 16:39:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92123 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 16:39:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 16:39:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 22327 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22247 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22239 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 16:39:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:39:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:38:58 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so4632620gxk.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zuiToMwB6TVyQEvqe1auThYHo+jb4lIE15xnV8nK1l4=; b=KtM6lLpqlliEyZGU5t8ocR/n1j4LfU93qI4BLqgetchLsU+lJD/8WTkRn+NgW61ZSm GwNY0KkUtBY95swzHHrfTrwaO62zH4Q6NO0IG4l6CaSundfBFzBasQDHegVtUYyomFOl QbytfxFROKCyyl+i+JVE7WlvfW+XmH0oPDvmY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Vf9KqcjnopU2c5tJJ72G03rBgOaqyyJVm7lEE41i3C7LoEX573mMdKfHjh42bikj93 osErUUMPeAjdOGEnFWHg7XyeUrtVPzeKfRNHkmgen7LTx3mPt55uTDI/1F5WWmWmcSn2 kNWYiysyNLmrfkGWt/N8LlqB7CGMCzrVEcD1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.79.79 with SMTP id o15mr6391273qak.365.1279643916073; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:38:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8a4c010e7dbd048bd451b9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f8a4c010e7dbd048bd451b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So the correct call should be: String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), 0, valueText.getLength(), "UTF-8"); Cheers On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jeff Bean wrote: > data.length is the length of the byte array. > > Text.getLength() most likely returns a different value than > getBytes.length. > > Hadoop reuses box class objects like Text, so what it's probably doing is > writing over the byte array, lengthening it as necessary, and just updating > a separate length attribute. > > Jeff > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Interesting. > > String class is able to handle this scenario: > > > > 348 public String(byte[] data, String encoding) throws > > UnsupportedEncodingException { > > 349 this(data, 0, data.length, encoding); > > 350 } > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Jeff Bean wrote: > > > > > I think the problem is here: > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > > > Javadoc for Text says: > > > > > > *getBytes< > > > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getBytes%28%29 > > > > > > > *() > > > Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to > > > getLength()< > > > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getLength%28%29 > > > >is > > > valid. > > > > > > So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value > > returned > > > by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > > > For your initial question on Text.set(). > > > > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is false, > > old > > > > data wouldn't be copied over. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase is > > not > > > > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce phase. > > > > > > > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. > > > > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, > > StreamXmlRecordReader > > > > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, > XmlInputFormat > > > was > > > > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > From an earlier post: > > > > > > > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < > > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vateRateSet> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector output, > > > > > > Reporter > > > > > > reporter) throws IOException { > > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; > > > > > > String valueString = new > > String(valueText.getBytes(), > > > > > > "UTF-8"); > > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); > > > > > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); > > > > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); > > > > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); > > > > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM > > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a > suggestion; > > I > > > > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but wouldn't > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; > it > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep > the > > > > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really > a > > > > > > valid point? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM > > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand > > your > > > > > > second question correctly: > > > > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > > > method(method lacal) ?" > > > > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. > > > > > > > > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { > > > > > > > > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = > > > > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); > > > > > > > > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > > > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); > > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > > > > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); > > > > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); > > > > > > > > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); > > > > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); > > > > > > > > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new > > > Path(args[0])); > > > > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new > > > > > > Path(args[1])); > > > > > > > > > > > > // Run the job > > > > > > try { > > > > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); > > > > > > } catch (IOException e) { > > > > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] > > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM > > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map > > > > > > method(method > > > > > > lacal) ? > > > > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task > configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > map() > > > > > > { > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > > > //rest of the code > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > Soumya. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < > > > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a > > > > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from > > > within > > > > > > > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML snippet > > (as > > > > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the > > file > > > > > > back into order. > > > > > > > Below is the snippet of code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); > > > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > > output, > > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = > > > > > > > (Text)value; > > > > > > > > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); > > > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); > > > > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); > > > > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { > > > > > > > return keyText; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = > keyText; > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { > > > > > > > return valueText; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = > > > > > > > valueText; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into > the > > > > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling > > out > > > > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between > the > > > Map > > > > > > > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For > > > Example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > te> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of > the > > > Key > > > > > > > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is > > the > > > > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I > do > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones > > passed > > > > > > > into the method, like below: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector > > output, > > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = > > (Text)key; > > > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new > > > > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = > > > > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); > > > > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, > valueText); > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { > > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code > at > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks > up > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this > > method > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Text Object: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { > > > > > > > setCapacity(len, false); > > > > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); > > > > > > > this.length = len; > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array > > has > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the > > first > > > > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" > > alone. > > > > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data format > > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used during > > the > > > > > > > shuffle? > > > > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? > > > > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? > > > > > > > 4) Is this a bug? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --00c09f8a4c010e7dbd048bd451b9-- From general-return-1846-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 16:51:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97590 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 16:51:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 16:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 47948 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:51:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47899 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 16:51:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47891 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 16:51:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:51:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:51:25 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so3656170pzk.35 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:50:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SREMvv2S5920s3+1uDQt8eGruk1sLO0xMgJSqeTbAr4=; b=YoRCNzMiOUANu0jS4IloLVWIEqkuM20LgFO4b54B0vbdXWHnyeCX6/sa8wXQsaMFIZ WCxnqf+gWAY8sDDssqRzgEMXjRAnip6BhbLfr/VGLx5sutSSGeHcaz+nLOeZaQr7dvlf 3M9a9L5AdcJN26nbpYfO1FoL8zwxVfGlrpuZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gMDkZM1CZnAM/mpe7IPGisXWkJ/kqMlPd2CvTj5hyNUDKyxE63oKTiZRyd5cdGvr+B h1AyFJ0r1uQbmnUEAR+inoVpbG3xtBhgXfPh3c8DLcEvodggT+dZMz2t/iuvLXa872qx HyHTsNZMUMaZuDC9eFey5GQEXvYm881HxyTG8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.57.13 with SMTP id f13mr9837237waa.116.1279644609360; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:50:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:50:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364587226134d0048bd47aa5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364587226134d0048bd47aa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I also added Peter's comment to the JIRA I logged: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6868 On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > So the correct call should be: > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), 0, > valueText.getLength(), "UTF-8"); > > Cheers > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jeff Bean wrote: > >> data.length is the length of the byte array. >> >> Text.getLength() most likely returns a different value than >> getBytes.length. >> >> Hadoop reuses box class objects like Text, so what it's probably doing is >> writing over the byte array, lengthening it as necessary, and just >> updating >> a separate length attribute. >> >> Jeff >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote: >> >> > Interesting. >> > String class is able to handle this scenario: >> > >> > 348 public String(byte[] data, String encoding) throws >> > UnsupportedEncodingException { >> > 349 this(data, 0, data.length, encoding); >> > 350 } >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Jeff Bean >> wrote: >> > >> > > I think the problem is here: >> > > >> > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); >> > > >> > > Javadoc for Text says: >> > > >> > > *getBytes< >> > > >> > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getBytes%28%29 >> > > > >> > > *() >> > > Returns the raw bytes; however, only data up to >> > > getLength()< >> > > >> > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/Text.html#getLength%28%29 >> > > >is >> > > valid. >> > > >> > > So try getting the length, truncating the byte array at the value >> > returned >> > > by getLength() and THEN converting it to a String. >> > > >> > > Jeff >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu wrote: >> > > >> > > > For your initial question on Text.set(). >> > > > Text.setCapacity() allocates new byte array. Since keepData is >> false, >> > old >> > > > data wouldn't be copied over. >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Peter Minearo < >> > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I am already using XmlInputFormat. The input into the Map phase >> is >> > not >> > > > > the problem. The problem lays in between the Map and Reduce >> phase. >> > > > > >> > > > > BTW - The article is correct. DO NOT USE StreamXmlRecordReader. >> > > > > XmlInputFormat is a lot faster. From my testing, >> > StreamXmlRecordReader >> > > > > took 8 minutes to read a 1 GB XML document; where as, >> XmlInputFormat >> > > was >> > > > > under 2 minutes. (Using 2 Core, 8GB machines) >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com] >> > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 9:44 PM >> > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML >> > > > > >> > > > > From an earlier post: >> > > > > >> > http://oobaloo.co.uk/articles/2010/1/20/processing-xml-in-hadoop.html >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Peter Minearo < >> > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Moving the variable to a local variable did not seem to work: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > vateRateSet> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector >> output, >> > > > > > Reporter >> > > > > > reporter) throws IOException { >> > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; >> > > > > > String valueString = new >> > String(valueText.getBytes(), >> > > > > > "UTF-8"); >> > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); >> > > > > > Text returnKeyText = new Text(); >> > > > > > Text returnValueText = new Text(); >> > > > > > returnKeyText.set(keyString); >> > > > > > returnValueText.set(valueString); >> > > > > > output.collect(returnKeyText, returnValueText); } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] >> > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:51 PM >> > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Whoops....right after I sent it and someone else made a >> suggestion; >> > I >> > > > > > realized what question 2 was about. I can try that, but >> wouldn't >> > > that >> > > > > >> > > > > > cause Object bloat? During the Hadoop training I went through; >> it >> > > was >> > > > > >> > > > > > mentioned to reuse the returning Key and Value objects to keep >> the >> > > > > > number of Objects created down to a minimum. Is this not really >> a >> > > > > > valid point? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: Peter Minearo [mailto:Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com] >> > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:44 PM >> > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Hadoop and XML >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I am not using multi-threaded Map tasks. Also, if I understand >> > your >> > > > > > second question correctly: >> > > > > > "Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map >> > > > > > method(method lacal) ?" >> > > > > > In the first code snippet I am doing exactly that. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Below is the class that runs the Job. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > public class HadoopJobClient { >> > > > > > >> > > > > > private static final Log LOGGER = >> > > > > > LogFactory.getLog(Prds.class.getName()); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > public static void main(String[] args) { >> > > > > > JobConf conf = new JobConf(Prds.class); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.start", ""); >> > > > > > conf.set("xmlinput.end", ""); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > conf.setJobName("PRDS Parse"); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); >> > > > > > conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > conf.setMapperClass(PrdsMapper.class); >> > > > > > conf.setReducerClass(PrdsReducer.class); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > conf.setInputFormat(XmlInputFormat.class); >> > > > > > conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new >> > > Path(args[0])); >> > > > > > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new >> > > > > > Path(args[1])); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > // Run the job >> > > > > > try { >> > > > > > JobClient.runJob(conf); >> > > > > > } catch (IOException e) { >> > > > > > LOGGER.error(e.getMessage(), e); >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: Soumya Banerjee [mailto:soumya.sbanerjee@gmail.com] >> > > > > > Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 2:29 PM >> > > > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > > > > > Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Can you please share the code of the job submission client ? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Also can you try creating the output key and values in the map >> > > > > > method(method >> > > > > > lacal) ? >> > > > > > Make sure you are not using multi threaded map task >> configuration. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > map() >> > > > > > { >> > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); >> > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > //rest of the code >> > > > > > } >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Soumya. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Peter Minearo < >> > > > > > Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have an XML file that has sparse data in it. I am running a >> > > > > > > MapReduce Job that reads in an XML file, pulls out a Key from >> > > within >> > > > > >> > > > > > > the XML snippet and then hands back the Key and the XML >> snippet >> > (as >> > > > > > > the Value) to the OutputCollector. The reason is to sort the >> > file >> > > > > > back into order. >> > > > > > > Below is the snippet of code. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper >> { >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > private Text keyText = new Text(); >> > > > > > > private Text valueText = new Text(); >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") >> > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector >> > output, >> > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text valueText = >> > > > > > > (Text)value; >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > String valueString = new String(valueText.getBytes(), >> "UTF-8"); >> > > > > > > String keyString = getXmlKey(valueString); >> > > > > > > getKeyText().set(keyString); getValueText().set(valueString); >> > > > > > > output.collect(getKeyText(), getValueText()); } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public Text getKeyText() { >> > > > > > > return keyText; >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public void setKeyText(Text keyText) { this.keyText = >> keyText; >> > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public Text getValueText() { >> > > > > > > return valueText; >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public void setValueText(Text valueText) { this.valueText = >> > > > > > > valueText; } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { >> > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The XML snippet from the Value is fine when it is passed into >> the >> > > > > > > map() method. I am not changing any data either, just pulling >> > out >> > > > > > > information for the key. The problem I am seeing is between >> the >> > > Map >> > > > > >> > > > > > > phase and the Reduce phase, the XML is getting munged. For >> > > Example: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > te> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It is my understanding that Hadoop uses the same instance of >> the >> > > Key >> > > > > >> > > > > > > and Value object when calling the Map method. What changes is >> > the >> > > > > > > data within those instances. So, I ran an experiment where I >> do >> > > not >> > > > > >> > > > > > > have different Key or Value Text Objects. I reuse the ones >> > passed >> > > > > > > into the method, like below: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public class XmlMapper extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper >> { >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") >> > > > > > > public void map(Object key, Object value, OutputCollector >> > output, >> > > > > > > Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Text keyText = >> > (Text)key; >> > > > > > > Text valueText = (Text)value; String valueString = new >> > > > > > > String(valueText.getBytes(), "UTF-8"); String keyString = >> > > > > > > getXmlKey(valueString); keyText.set(keyString); >> > > > > > > valueText.set(valueString); output.collect(keyText, >> valueText); >> > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > private String getXmlKey(String value) { >> > > > > > > // Get the Key from the XML in the value. >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > What was interesting about this is the fact that the XML was >> > > getting >> > > > > >> > > > > > > munged within the Map Phase. When I changed over to the code >> at >> > > the >> > > > > >> > > > > > > top, the Map phase was fine. However, the Reduce phase picks >> up >> > > the >> > > > > >> > > > > > > munged XML. Trying to debug the problem, I came across this >> > method >> > > > > > > in >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > the Text Object: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public void set(byte[] utf8, int start, int len) { >> > > > > > > setCapacity(len, false); >> > > > > > > System.arraycopy(utf8, start, bytes, 0, len); >> > > > > > > this.length = len; >> > > > > > > } >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > If the "bytes" array had a length of 1000 and the "utf8" array >> > has >> > > a >> > > > > >> > > > > > > length of 500; doing a System.arraycopy() would only copy the >> > first >> > > > > > > 500 from "utf8" to "bytes" but leave the last 500 in "bytes" >> > alone. >> > > > > > > Could this be the cause of the XML munging? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > All of this leads me to a few questions: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1) Has anyone successfully used XML snippets as the data >> format >> > > > > > > within >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > a MapReduce job; not just reading from the file but used >> during >> > the >> > > > > > > shuffle? >> > > > > > > 2) Is anyone seeing this problem with XML or any other format? >> > > > > > > 3) Does anyone know what is going on? >> > > > > > > 4) Is this a bug? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Peter >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > --0016364587226134d0048bd47aa5-- From general-return-1847-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 17:36:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16025 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 17:36:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 17:36:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 5926 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 17:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5747 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 17:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5739 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 17:36:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:36:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of SRS0=ksgr7x=O2=russellwinterassociates.com=emma@yourhostingaccount.com designates 65.254.253.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.254.253.149] (HELO mailout18.yourhostingaccount.com) (65.254.253.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:36:04 +0000 Received: from mailscan13.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.13] helo=mailscan13.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout18.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1ObGjH-0006Zp-SZ for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:35:43 -0400 Received: from impout03.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.3] helo=impout03.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan13.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1ObGjG-00051J-Sl for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:35:42 -0400 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8]) by impout03.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id kHbj1e0050ASqTN0000000; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:35:43 -0400 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.8 X-EN-IMPSID: kHbj1e0050ASqTN0000000 Received: from host86-173-2-175.range86-173.btcentralplus.com ([86.173.2.175] helo=D1W03L3J) by authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1ObGjG-0002Dg-BN for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:35:42 -0400 From: "Emma Russell" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Developers sought for web crawling project Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:35:37 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcsoG1EYM6NdoV7KSUCa5yN6vOISwQAFlr7w Content-Language: en-gb X-EN-UserInfo: 241204cd915fb4df7b3509d8aef24c22:9706facac6a42dca8255befa5a58a182 X-EN-AuthUser: emma_russell@pop.powweb.com Sender: "Emma Russell" X-EN-OrigIP: 86.173.2.175 X-EN-OrigHost: host86-173-2-175.range86-173.btcentralplus.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Tim, Try looking for people on experts exchange. I am a high tech recruiter = for the uk and I often look for people on ee as I can see not only the best answers but also an insight into how the person thinks and which areas = they have the most strength Hope this helps Emma Russell SVP Major Accounts Dir=A0=A0=A0 0208 498 9398 Fax=A0=A0 0208 498 9399 Mob=A0 0778 229 5086 emma@russellwinterassociates.com 20 Roebuck Lane Buckhurst Hill Essex IG9 5QN.=A0=A0=A0 P. 0208 498 = 9398=A0=A0 F. 0208 498 9399=20 Russell Winter Associates Limited is registered in England and Wales at = 2nd Floor 196 High Road London N22 8HH. Registered Number. = 04896428.=A0=A0=A0=20 =A0 This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient = and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is = prohibited.=A0 If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments.=A0 -----Original Message----- From: Tim Robertson [mailto:timrobertson100@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 20 July 2010 15:53 To: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Developers sought for web crawling project Hi all, Disclosure: I have been an active member of the Hadoop / HBase / Hive mailing lists for some time. I am not a recruiter, but looking to increase a development team that I lead. I sincerely apologize if this message is against mailing list etiquette; I have not seen any guidelines forbidding this. We are looking to expand the development team based in Copenhagen, Denmark. We run and operate an indexing system that provides access to biodiversity information, and specifically 100s millions of point based observations of species occurrence documented in the past century. Our live system is outgrowing a MySQL database, and we are already tentatively using Hive, Hadoop and have run some tests using HBase. Over the next 16 months we will rework the whole system, including custom reporting, custom maps and other visualizations, real time search indexes, reducing latency, quality control integration, custom vocabulary work etc. Our final architecture will likely include Hive, Hadoop, HBase, Lucene (SOLR / ElasticSearch?), Sqoop and PostGIS. If you are familiar with these technologies, and the thought of some time working in Europe appeals to you, then we'd love to hear from you. Guidelines for applications are on the advert: http://tinyurl.com/gbif-dev-job Thanks, Tim From general-return-1848-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 18:24:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41739 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 18:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 18:24:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 1692 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 18:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1536 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 18:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1528 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 18:24:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:24:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:24:34 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:23:52 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:24:14 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcsoOLRLU5FpYfXmR1SyynHR54PRnQ== Message-ID: <7FC5996B-8D27-4E79-84A9-F240E47C351C@richrelevance.com> References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D055@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D055@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >=20 > This sounds like a bug. >=20 > Let's say you create a Text object and drop in a String that sets the byt= e array length to 200. Then drop in a a second String that sets the byte a= rray length to 500. Since, the new length is greater than the previous len= gth; the byte array length is reset to the longer length. Now, if you drop= in a third String that would set the byte array length to 350; the Text ob= ject does not replace the byte array with a new length of 350; it utilizes = the greater length of 500 and sets an extra variable to track the "real" le= ngth. >=20 > So: Text.getBytes().length !=3D Text.getLength() >=20 > This does 2 things: >=20 > 1. Passes around more data than what is needed > 2. Makes the Text object confusing to work with >=20 > Text.getBytes().length =3D=3D Text.getLength() - should be the correct be= havior. >=20 >=20 I don't think so. Passing around byte arrays larger than the valid data is= common practice in Java for performance reasons. Hence, the common method= signature containing (byte[] bytes, int len, int offset) and similar. C= reating a new byte array for each resize defeats the purpose of re-using th= e byte array and the Text object -- lower memory allocation and improved CP= U cache locality. The byte array here is a buffer, it does not represent t= he entire string. From general-return-1849-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 20 18:29:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42709 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 18:29:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 18:29:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 6032 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 18:29:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5971 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2010 18:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5959 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2010 18:29:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:29:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:29:06 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:28:45 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:29:08 -0700 Subject: Re: Hadoop and XML Thread-Topic: Hadoop and XML Thread-Index: AcsoOWMktGjIeqx5RDafx1DyrMpVbA== Message-ID: References: <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F46C@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D051@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F4BA@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D053@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com><5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B0828F5EB@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <5A4D71ACC2708E4BB1BD7B6F87E51C6B02B6D055@sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com> <7FC5996B-8D27-4E79-84A9-F240E47C351C@richrelevance.com> In-Reply-To: <7FC5996B-8D27-4E79-84A9-F240E47C351C@richrelevance.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Scott Carey wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> This sounds like a bug. >>=20 >> Let's say you create a Text object and drop in a String that sets the by= te array length to 200. Then drop in a a second String that sets the byte = array length to 500. Since, the new length is greater than the previous le= ngth; the byte array length is reset to the longer length. Now, if you dro= p in a third String that would set the byte array length to 350; the Text o= bject does not replace the byte array with a new length of 350; it utilizes= the greater length of 500 and sets an extra variable to track the "real" l= ength. >>=20 >> So: Text.getBytes().length !=3D Text.getLength() >>=20 >> This does 2 things: >>=20 >> 1. Passes around more data than what is needed >> 2. Makes the Text object confusing to work with >>=20 >> Text.getBytes().length =3D=3D Text.getLength() - should be the correct b= ehavior. >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > I don't think so. Passing around byte arrays larger than the valid data = is common practice in Java for performance reasons. Hence, the common meth= od signature containing (byte[] bytes, int len, int offset) and similar. = Creating a new byte array for each resize defeats the purpose of re-using = the byte array and the Text object -- lower memory allocation and improved = CPU cache locality. The byte array here is a buffer, it does not represent= the entire string. >=20 To be more specific here, shouldn't Text.toString() do the trick? If Text= .toString() doesn't work and does something other than what you expect here= , it should be documented and that class should have another helper method = that gets you a String from Text. Calling getBytes() and manually constru= cting a string means you should know what those bytes represent -- a buffer= where the bytes for the string are from index - to Text.getLength().= From general-return-1850-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 15:32:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46682 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 15:32:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 15:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 65557 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 15:32:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65474 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 15:32:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65466 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 15:32:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:32:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.64] (HELO qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:32:09 +0000 Received: from omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kdNZ1e0040cQ2SLA7fXgHl; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:31:40 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kfXf1e0061GAoR68WfXfcE; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:31:40 +0000 Message-Id: <3BB5B9B0-1D8C-4C32-91B1-51D74A4A8DB5@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-24-771388440 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Bay Area HUG tonight Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:31:39 -0700 Cc: Susheel Kaushik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-24-771388440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't forget that after taking off June for the Hadoop Summit, Yahoo =20 is continuing to host the monthly Bay Area HUG tonight. One =20 organizational note is that Shusheel Kaushik (susheel@yahoo-inc.com) =20 has taken over from Dekel organizing the Bay Area HUGs, so please send =20= your suggestions for ideas to him. Tonight's agenda is: * 6:00 - 6:30 - Socializing and Beers * 6:30 =96 7:00 =96 Online Content Optimization with Hadoop, Nitin = Motgi, =20 Yahoo! We make extensive use of Hadoop technology stack in our content =20 optimization systems. Using Hadoop, we are able to scale to build =20 models for millions of items, and users in near-real time. We leverage =20= HBase for point lookups/stores of these models. We also use Pig for =20 phrasing our workflows so the map-reduce parallelism is abstracted out =20= of core processing. * 7:00 - 7:30 =96 Hadoop at eBay, Anil Madan, eBay This talk will illustrate how eBay is leveraging its data assets to do =20= advanced insights and analytics. Learn how eBay is sourcing huge volumes of data into the cluster and =20 running Click Stream and Transactional data analysis for user =20 behavior, search quality and research use cases. Anil Madan is the Director of Engineering at eBay responsible for =20 Hadoop cluster build out. * 7:30 =96 8:00 - Introduction to Avro, Doug Cutting, Cloudera Avro is a serialization system. It supports interoperable, efficient, =20= dynamic data storage and RPC. It's currently implemented in C, C++, Java, Python and Ruby. Support =20 for Map-Reduce over Avro data is being developed, and we expect Hadoop =20= to eventually move to Avro for its RPC. You can sign up on meetup: http://bit.ly/9UAnIN -- Owen= --Apple-Mail-24-771388440-- From general-return-1851-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 16:08:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61847 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 16:08:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 16:08:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 19667 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:08:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19214 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:08:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2657 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 15:58:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=BHZI923ZMRa35NxOXiIsGuIOTg+xArCydWt82sUDeHzoZ7NL34GyNztVbIBeHb8f x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB28ED.207B7DAE" Subject: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:55:22 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Thread-Index: AcsocGVLaYiC1TtBTUmICtz3JYC2zw== From: "Susheel Kaushik" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2010 15:55:45.0410 (UTC) FILETIME=[2DFCE620:01CB28ED] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB28ED.207B7DAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Hadoopers, =20 Reminder that July Hadoop Users Group is tomorrow. =20 Agenda: =20 * 6:00 - 6:30 - Socializing and Beers * 6:30 - 7:00 - Online Content Optimization with Hadoop, Nitin Motgi, Yahoo!=20 * 7:00 - 7:30 - Hadoop at eBay, Anil Madan, eBay=20 * 7:30 - 8:00 - Introduction to Avro, Doug Cutting, Cloudera=20 * QnA , Open Discussion =20 Session details at http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/13546804/. (Please register and RSVP in case you have not done so)=20 =20 Looking forward to seeing you there! =20 Susheel =20 PS: In case you miss the event, the slides and videos will be posted at http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/=20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB28ED.207B7DAE-- From general-return-1852-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 16:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67361 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 16:27:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 16:27:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 63806 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63709 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63701 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 16:27:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:27:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.65.144.80] (HELO p02c11o147.mxlogic.net) (208.65.144.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:27:02 +0000 Received: from unknown [63.251.237.3] (EHLO p02c11o147.mxlogic.net) by p02c11o147.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.7.0-0) with ESMTP id 2cf174c4.66771940.3105.00-565.7126.p02c11o147.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:26:42 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4c471fc24db77a2f-674b1332d8dff54185c5ec7ef0779f9461a82b68 Received: from unknown [63.251.237.3] (EHLO mtiexch01.mti.com) by p02c11o147.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.7.0-0) with ESMTP id 9fd174c4.0.1745.00-372.3976.p02c11o147.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:20:06 -0600 (MDT) X-MXL-Hash: 4c471e361d90bed7-b600a4ea528bcb3693d8d4e0386dad5c3f85ecf8 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:19:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1E3DCD1C63492545881FACB6063A57C1061C54CB@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Thread-Index: AcsocGVLaYiC1TtBTUmICtz3JYC2zwAf/Uqg References: From: "Wayne Augsburger" To: X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010070601)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [63.251.237.3] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=MtLyulyNObIA:10 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel] X-AnalysisOut: [0A:10 a=xupnbh4h0YLOHZnncC45HQ==:17 a=AnZFoEh2AAAA:8 a=mV9] X-AnalysisOut: [VRH-2AAAA:8 a=kYD52I4EAAAA:8 a=oxCZ_N96AAAA:8 a=bk71vwnq-T] X-AnalysisOut: [KedbdFk8YA:9 a=6SjYJCSUzWfVMzLBd3C3sFu8QwsA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8u] X-AnalysisOut: [gA:10 a=-NOWlJdPJ3YA:10] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it tonight or tomorrow? Owen's email said tonight. Thanks, Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Susheel Kaushik [mailto:susheel@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:55 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Hello Hadoopers, =20 Reminder that July Hadoop Users Group is tomorrow. =20 Agenda: =20 * 6:00 - 6:30 - Socializing and Beers * 6:30 - 7:00 - Online Content Optimization with Hadoop, Nitin Motgi, Yahoo!=20 * 7:00 - 7:30 - Hadoop at eBay, Anil Madan, eBay=20 * 7:30 - 8:00 - Introduction to Avro, Doug Cutting, Cloudera=20 * QnA , Open Discussion =20 Session details at http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/13546804/. (Please register and RSVP in case you have not done so)=20 =20 Looking forward to seeing you there! =20 Susheel =20 PS: In case you miss the event, the slides and videos will be posted at http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/=20 =20 From general-return-1853-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 16:34:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69417 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 16:34:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 16:34:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 76199 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:34:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76138 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:34:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76130 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 16:34:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:34:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.86.156] (HELO n8.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.86.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:33:58 +0000 Received: from [68.142.200.224] by n8.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jul 2010 16:32:22 -0000 Received: from [216.252.111.168] by t5.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jul 2010 16:32:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp103.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jul 2010 16:31:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 848545.61016.bm@omp103.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 17654 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jul 2010 16:31:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1279729881; bh=Spsj/WQx6KzOxi/+0wcihFAn1gG8UfN619twpwuNNJI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pmgzf1qpVNZ42aYGMqf7UdEgFX/lfNRs0jwb3SaYRbLHesX/yYtS7aQCddAlw15ffSeF6zFOFq+llvUvCfunMyRqfRTLWLLpuP3CS57HmblS1iG3fuRgIsYVUIP0ZTt6XCznkTdw8ewDZi+0ePlv0YiHZpKot8wFNFOdpfnTSKw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yf3/8u47rAXDSQQ+HFIYtpYbb1Dvfd07F8Gza6ZzDgG/9MtA6Wp3Q8GV2U/kpAv/elI2z5lh5X/eqFNulZebLxAXpSwhxSY58KsgeUk3ZES9Aduf6MSwllsEPYqeR9kFtg2gZ26WYHWsLnW0+ODBpr1ymVq6jKFlB2aesLJ175Y=; Message-ID: <750244.17617.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Io.8YBsVM1l276xByUXZ65yK0.dwu.l26kJ4K4Om9E4MW6g h4_D0icLa1BYzzp1XTg2NUeIV9ltH6DjChqFr6vzkoFgorfOl6zpOUYCSbst m_B1CLgJ9xX7x5nAHe2kVYHnpmiVZeh1e6AqbsfElaAl_CyipGIauQtapYN5 g.XyXYH2opEy40b_PobKdDzJ7C0nnjwMBbXhMMs_MEUH5pJNy9pymyYdVpR6 kfXqgC4Y4YF243etQDJyl0vKFr3hJo.8iRfvemzmAitXVrye6vPFNpnX.b64 G0QGNQvYydOmNqW_Qndq6JpghHBxHTdFkrwlvk.G._ATnR.X3kOHAFaz6DUD 0_h0MbqBbc61qC.MYNQNF Received: from [216.145.54.158] by web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:31:21 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/420.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.276605 References: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:31:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think you mean to say July Hadoop Users Group is July 21 *today*. Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Susheel Kaushik > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 8:55:22 AM > Subject: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting > > Hello Hadoopers, > > > > Reminder that July Hadoop Users Group is tomorrow. > > > > Agenda: > > > > * 6:00 - 6:30 - Socializing and Beers > > * 6:30 - 7:00 - Online Content Optimization with Hadoop, Nitin Motgi, > Yahoo! > > * 7:00 - 7:30 - Hadoop at eBay, Anil Madan, eBay > > * 7:30 - 8:00 - Introduction to Avro, Doug Cutting, Cloudera > > * QnA , Open Discussion > > > > Session details at http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/13546804/. > (Please register and RSVP in case you have not done so) > > > > Looking forward to seeing you there! > > > > Susheel > > > > PS: In case you miss the event, the slides and videos will be posted at > http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/ > > > > From general-return-1854-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 16:49:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73112 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 16:49:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 16:49:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4872 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4773 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 16:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4765 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 16:49:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.17] (HELO qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:49:27 +0000 Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kbfj1e0041GhbT85Agp7dS; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:49:07 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kgox1e00R2VBGtd3Tgp0MQ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:49:05 +0000 Message-Id: <5F4B533D-608A-4C3F-929E-9C95B86FCE71@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1E3DCD1C63492545881FACB6063A57C1061C54CB@mtiexch01.mti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:48:56 -0700 References: <1E3DCD1C63492545881FACB6063A57C1061C54CB@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Wayne Augsburger wrote: > Is it tonight or tomorrow? Owen's email said tonight. Susheel's message got stuck in the Apache servers for a day. I sent mine because his hadn't come through. The meeting is *TONIGHT*. -- Owen From general-return-1855-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 17:16:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84335 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 17:16:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 17:16:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 44547 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 17:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44381 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 17:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44373 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 17:15:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:15:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mdwasti@hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.54.190.29] (HELO bay0-omc1-s18.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:15:51 +0000 Received: from BAY145-W22 ([65.54.190.61]) by bay0-omc1-s18.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:29 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_d38e2a41-cd5a-4d55-92e2-7be0be4f394c_" X-Originating-IP: [208.84.47.48] From: Syed Wasti To: Hadoop Subject: Lazy initialization of Reducers Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:15:29 -0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2010 17:15:29.0882 (UTC) FILETIME=[51C163A0:01CB28F8] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_d38e2a41-cd5a-4d55-92e2-7be0be4f394c_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C I read about this Reducer Lazy initialization in a document found in the be= low URL. http://www.scribd.com/doc/23046928/Hadoop-Performance-Tuning It says =93:In M/R job Reducers are initialized with Mappers at the job ini= tialization=2C but the reduce method is called in reduce phase when all the= maps had been finished. So in large jobs where Reducer loads data (>100 MB= for business logic) in-memory on initialization=2C the performance can be = increased by lazily initializing Reducers i.e. loading data in reduce metho= d controlled by an initialize flag variable which assures that it is loaded= only once. By lazily initializing Reducers which require memory (for busin= ess logic) on initialization=2C number of maps can be increased.=94 But I did not find any other resource which talks about Reducer Lazy initia= lization. Does anyone have experience on this ? If yes=2C how and where can I set this parameter to get it working. Thanks for the support. Regards Syed Wasti = --_d38e2a41-cd5a-4d55-92e2-7be0be4f394c_-- From general-return-1856-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 17:39:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94644 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 17:39:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 17:39:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 79647 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 17:39:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79597 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 17:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79589 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 17:39:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:39:49 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so3890407qwd.35 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UWywDlUHJJNttr0Zk7/6OWO/ZBcApppmTQIbpgMNdKw=; b=d30tIYd2Pto8l80R0WlNG8/nzXh9rCCmNqCpdz5CMnRPByRDx5jzMUvBzrvL6V3aVS JKJ24AYTJxqfvwX/qWkeRHjfPcltILFAxH930Fa9kAc3GW1sSgaORDLF+hINvqDijuVx zsdMq4j0WKPlDjsyCqcTlHtigIofJQ0etf+Gw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HI3FCB0v1kMrwaQLc6pyK9Ej3ybYO4+BFokoldAOUOiWmZ5XDTyXEbDcSs+k16kXt3 HPYZFpXnomNVc7TJUDHJAgqVhiirOvXRpbpmLNrubdo7sN9feAlzvJJ1yftrw7uTtMKa 6lmnh5Y9JekqGnClS+WU1mV+9Zv1IMX14K40E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.98.81 with SMTP id p17mr363994qan.290.1279733919522; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.75.85 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:38:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:38:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lazy initialization of Reducers From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f89923eae2241048be94507 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f89923eae2241048be94507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't find such parameter in 0.20.2 Please create such flag in your own class. On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Syed Wasti wrote: > > Hi, > > I read about this Reducer Lazy initialization in a document found in the > below URL. > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/23046928/Hadoop-Performance-Tuning > > > > It says =93:In M/R job Reducers are initialized with Mappers at the job > initialization, but the reduce method is called in reduce phase when all = the > maps had been finished. So in large jobs where Reducer loads data (>100 M= B > for business logic) in-memory on initialization, the performance can be > increased by lazily initializing Reducers i.e. loading data in reduce met= hod > controlled by an initialize flag variable which assures that it is loaded > only once. By lazily initializing Reducers which require memory (for > business logic) on initialization, number of maps can be increased.=94 > > > > But I did not find any other resource which talks about Reducer Lazy > initialization. > > Does anyone have experience on this ? > > If yes, how and where can I set this parameter to get it working. > > > > Thanks for the support. > > > Regards > Syed Wasti > > > --00c09f89923eae2241048be94507-- From general-return-1857-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 18:29:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22807 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 18:29:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 18:29:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 45099 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 18:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44847 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 18:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44839 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 18:29:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:29:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:29:48 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o6LI5AxK030079 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:05:10 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id DF46B4871FEA for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:26:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 5o4QpWtDWRDAAPX3 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:26:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o6LIQHiL022080 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:26:17 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:26:17 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:26:15 -0500 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting Thread-Index: Acso8ouWor92iB1nR82uwL3Tul2hxwAD406w Message-ID: References: <750244.17617.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <750244.17617.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not to confuse everyone but yes today is also Chicago's area Hadoop User = Group meeting too. ;-) Ok so it's a shameless plug. :-) -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze [mailto:s29752-hadoopgeneral@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:31 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting I think you mean to say July Hadoop Users Group is July 21 *today*. Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Susheel Kaushik > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 8:55:22 AM > Subject: Hadoop User Group - July Meeting >=20 > Hello Hadoopers, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Reminder that July Hadoop Users Group is tomorrow. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Agenda: >=20 >=20 >=20 > * 6:00 - 6:30 - Socializing and Beers >=20 > * 6:30 - 7:00 - Online Content Optimization with Hadoop, Nitin Motgi, > Yahoo!=20 >=20 > * 7:00 - 7:30 - Hadoop at eBay, Anil Madan, eBay=20 >=20 > * 7:30 - 8:00 - Introduction to Avro, Doug Cutting, Cloudera=20 >=20 > * QnA , Open Discussion >=20 >=20 >=20 > Session details at http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/13546804/. > (Please register and RSVP in case you have not done so)=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Looking forward to seeing you there! >=20 >=20 >=20 > Susheel >=20 >=20 >=20 > PS: In case you miss the event, the slides and videos will be posted = at > http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1858-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 21 22:24:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19972 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2010 22:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jul 2010 22:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 53440 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 22:24:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53374 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2010 22:24:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53359 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2010 22:24:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:24:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:24:46 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o6LMN0cR072600; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:23:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:subject:mime-version:date:references:x-mailer; b=lL7kn//yEz4k7mGVCK3PfnBnvS9Zd7WUJgvI41vV1CFc7u92WpRXU61NIW/WwnUe Message-Id: <4C051910-DC55-4D7A-90E6-8B03850630CC@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Lazy initialization of Reducers Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:22:59 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Moving to mapreduce-user@, bcc general@. Please do not use the =20 general@ list for project specific discussions. On Jul 21, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Syed Wasti wrote: > It says =93:In M/R job Reducers are initialized with Mappers at the =20= > job initialization, but the reduce method is called in reduce phase =20= > when all the maps had been finished. So in large jobs where Reducer =20= > loads data (>100 MB for business logic) in-memory on initialization, =20= > the performance can be increased by lazily initializing Reducers =20 > i.e. loading data in reduce method controlled by an initialize flag =20= > variable which assures that it is loaded only once. By lazily =20 > initializing Reducers which require memory (for business logic) on =20 > initialization, number of maps can be increased.=94 The part about 'loading data in reduce method controlled by an =20 initialize flag variable which assures that it is loaded only once' =20 makes no sense to me. However, you can 'slowstart' reduces by ensuring sufficient maps are =20 complete before _any_ reduces are launched... from mapred-default.xml: mapred.reduce.slowstart.completed.maps 0.05 Fraction of the number of maps in the job which should =20= be complete before reduces are scheduled for the job. Arun From general-return-1859-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 22 18:25:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3817 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2010 18:25:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Jul 2010 18:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59448 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2010 18:25:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59271 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2010 18:25:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59262 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2010 18:25:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:25:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mdwasti@hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.54.190.13] (HELO bay0-omc1-s2.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:24:57 +0000 Received: from BAY145-W56 ([65.54.190.61]) by bay0-omc1-s2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:24:36 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_0ab71581-0189-4388-8db0-6de27b862eae_" X-Originating-IP: [208.84.47.48] From: Syed Wasti To: Hadoop Subject: TaskTracker Error Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:24:36 -0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2010 18:24:36.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[23F3EF00:01CB29CB] --_0ab71581-0189-4388-8db0-6de27b862eae_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C I am seeing the below two errors consistently while running my map/reduce j= obs. This does not stop my script=2C but throws an error on datanode and su= ccessfully completes the same task on a different datanode. The task could = fail on any datanode=2C there are no blacklisted datanodes. Any thoughts on why this is and how can this be resolved ? This is the whole stack=3B java.lang.Throwable: Child Error at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:472) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 13= 4. at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:459) Second Error: This is all it gives. Error: null Thanks for the support. Regards Syed Wasti = --_0ab71581-0189-4388-8db0-6de27b862eae_-- From general-return-1860-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 22 20:54:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58985 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2010 20:54:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Jul 2010 20:54:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 91355 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2010 20:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91307 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2010 20:54:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91292 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2010 20:54:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:54:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mdwasti@hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.161 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.54.190.161] (HELO bay0-omc3-s23.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:54:40 +0000 Received: from BAY145-W33 ([65.54.190.189]) by bay0-omc3-s23.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:54:19 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_a25434ea-45bf-4e27-b27d-934be2688525_" X-Originating-IP: [208.84.47.48] From: Syed Wasti To: pig user , Hadoop Subject: RE: TaskTracker Error Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:54:20 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2010 20:54:19.0630 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E1BB0E0:01CB29E0] --_a25434ea-45bf-4e27-b27d-934be2688525_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Found this almost a year old discussion=2C on the same error code and it lo= oks like a JVM crash.=20 The discussion confirms the crash on JDK 14 and I am using JDK version 18.= =20 http://markmail.org/message/74yv7zyuq7ucm2z6 From: mdwasti@hotmail.com To: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: TaskTracker Error Date: Thu=2C 22 Jul 2010 11:45:38 -0700 Hi=2C I am seeing the below two errors consistently while running my script. This= does not stop my script=2C but throws an error on datanode and successfull= y completes the same task on a different datanode. The task could fail on a= ny datanode=2C there are no blacklisted datanodes. Any thoughts on why this is and how can this be resolved ? =20 This is the whole stack=3B java.lang.Throwable: Child Error at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:472) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 13= 4. at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:459) =20 Second Error: This is all it gives. Error: null Third Error: Error: (class: org/apache/pig/builtin/PigStorage=2C method: setLocation sig= nature: (Ljava/lang/String=3BLorg/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/Job=3B)V)=20 Thanks for the support. Regards Syed Wasti = --_a25434ea-45bf-4e27-b27d-934be2688525_-- From general-return-1861-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 26 14:52:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19785 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 14:52:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 14:52:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 5093 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 14:52:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4802 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 14:52:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4794 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2010 14:52:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:52:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:52:16 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49906BBA1 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C4DA0C2.70208@crs4.it> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:50:42 +0200 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100629 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Announcing Pydoop 0.3.6_rc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, we've just released version 0.3.6_rc2 of Pydoop (http://pydoop.sourceforge.net). Pydoop is a Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop, built upon the C++ Pipes and the C libhdfs APIs, that allows to write full-fledged MapReduce applications with HDFS access. Its key features are: * access to most MapReduce application components: Mapper, Reducer, RecordReader, RecordWriter, Partitioner; * direct access to JobConf parameters; support for counters and status messages; * CPython implementation: any Python module can be used, either pure Python or C/C++ extension (note that this is not possible with Jython); * Direct HDFS access from Python. With Pydoop you can write complete applications in Python, using a programming style that's very similar to the one supported by the Java and C++ APIs: developers define classes that are instantiated and used by the framework. This allows for much cleaner and faster [1] code with respect to the traditional Python + Streaming approach. See http://pydoop.sourceforge.net/docs/examples for a collection of Pydoop usage examples, including a complete application that leverages the Hadoop Distributed Cache to distribute all required Python packages, including Pydoop itself, to Hadoop cluster nodes. Pydoop is actively used in production at our site, mostly for data-intensive biocomputing applications. The 0.3.6_rc2 release is being used internally in production. We'd greatly appreciate any kind of feedback before we release it as 0.3.6 (stable), which we expect to do within two weeks or so. Links: * download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydoop/files * release notes: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pydoop/index.php?title=Release_Notes [1] Simone Leo and Gianluigi Zanetti. "Pydoop: a Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop". In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC 2010), pages 819–825. ACM, 2010. -- Simone Leo Distributed Computing group Advanced Computing and Communications program CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simleo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-1862-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 26 16:03:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78239 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 16:03:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 16:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20862 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 16:03:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20739 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 16:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20731 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2010 16:03:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:03:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.26] (HELO col0-omc1-s16.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:02:57 +0000 Received: from COL117-W15 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s16.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:02:36 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_d2511a14-1382-42ed-8104-6c2372ba35a2_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: Fair Scheduler documentation? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:02:36 -0500 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2010 16:02:36.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7159D80:01CB2CDB] --_d2511a14-1382-42ed-8104-6c2372ba35a2_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C Ok so we're setting up the fair scheduler on one of our clusters.=20 The only documentation I could find is the wiki=2C and then one or two powe= r points... Is there any source that contains all of the possible options allowed in th= e allocations.xml file? I came across something like somewhere the other day.. couldn't f= ind it. Not sure if its a valid option. Also is there any logged output when the allocations file is read and there= 's a bad xml parameter? Thx -Mike =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search=2C chat and e-mail from your inb= ox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1= --_d2511a14-1382-42ed-8104-6c2372ba35a2_-- From general-return-1863-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 26 16:14:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85570 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 16:14:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 16:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 32366 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 16:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32293 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2010 16:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32285 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2010 16:14:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.12] (HELO col0-omc1-s2.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:14:14 +0000 Received: from COL117-W57 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s2.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:13:53 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_835800a7-e078-4408-9f09-224a4ced2398_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Fair Scheduler documentation? Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:13:53 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2010 16:13:53.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[8ABF79B0:01CB2CDD] --_835800a7-e078-4408-9f09-224a4ced2398_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > From: michael_segel@hotmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Fair Scheduler documentation? > Date: Mon=2C 26 Jul 2010 11:02:36 -0500 >=20 >=20 > Hi=2C >=20 > Ok so we're setting up the fair scheduler on one of our clusters.=20 >=20 > The only documentation I could find is the wiki=2C and then one or two po= wer points... >=20 > Is there any source that contains all of the possible options allowed in = the allocations.xml file? >=20 > I came across something like somewhere the other day.. couldn't= find it. Not sure if its a valid > option. [SNIP] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-698 (Found using Yahoo! as my search engine... ) Ok this explains why I can't implement maxMaps on my cloud where I'm testin= g out the fair scheduler. Also is there a way to specify the pool to be used at the time the job is l= aunched?=20 Thx -Mike =20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hot= mail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=3Dmultiaccount&ocid=3DP= ID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4= --_835800a7-e078-4408-9f09-224a4ced2398_-- From general-return-1864-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 01:12:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54149 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 01:12:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 01:12:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 64367 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 01:12:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64261 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 01:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64253 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 01:12:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:12:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.205] (HELO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:12:47 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.161.41]) by na3sys009aob111.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTE+D+S/pJ5LSiCLLJDZG4l2Fu/Mw1lfP@postini.com; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:12:26 PDT Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so1130999fxm.14 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.132.131 with SMTP id 3mr409415hbr.211.1280279543944; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.133.65 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:12:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sameer Joshi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f427806e1797048c684fd1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f427806e1797048c684fd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine and starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop wordcount example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and server IP addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former followed by a server restart) Any thoughts? Thank you. The output is given below # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets tests/out7 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201007270544_0001 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED Error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED Error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED Error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201007270544_0001 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 -- Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. Senior computer scientist, Serene Software. --001485f427806e1797048c684fd1-- From general-return-1865-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 04:12:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97889 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 04:12:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 04:12:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 35454 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 04:12:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35086 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 04:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35077 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 04:12:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:12:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:12:48 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2216206iwn.35 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:12:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ivAhL0pD3wNfMChYdZg7A/IVqhUcA3QIYEFmQaonEVQ=; b=hSCSz9tBehgSa5ixBvJte3CeuEqB4yIhBThfObsEsd3PHCqOeW1l8G37EOO2svAhXH Gx4tLTO+0ByN8ce+om9G3fRckBwSZxKfLiOLLRJdFdYglloVOCGlbve0qSi8HFIEtgr5 Ad61n1D/5Qwyy5cNEtW/rZhxOESLl8+QM/JRw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bXNfKquYCxq2XpT26etLnM4gZJgENDR9zjuG669shu/eHvp7W96NEUFLtMT7w+bRMo MJfHuc/+KlmR6/qypEDnqPhp4gZzd2xRzDPFUTSkYYKvoauhfUhnE19gTZV07Djzyd/1 9WH6ifMmtmCHQsSQvJo+yqUwAngPO7TcGjYTM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.9 with SMTP id k9mr11595881iby.127.1280290346790; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.12.136 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:12:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:42:26 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045013dcc546f4a048c6ad341 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --005045013dcc546f4a048c6ad341 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sameer, For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and hostname for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you will get the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry like: 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine and > starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException at > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop wordcount > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and server IP > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former > followed by a server restart) > > Any thoughts? > Thank you. > > > The output is given below > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets tests/out7 > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process > : > 1 > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201007270544_0001 > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > job_201007270544_0001 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > > -- > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > Senior computer scientist, > Serene Software. > --005045013dcc546f4a048c6ad341-- From general-return-1866-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 07:55:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76203 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 07:55:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 07:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 84156 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 07:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83852 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 07:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83840 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 07:55:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:55:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:55:44 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so1449416pvc.35 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AE36a3Ka7KEVwSax1G0Teh9BgcOH12eAHwFaAexEv4Q=; b=QBUMHlNQwPJdTyJ4QECaCXfD139Pe9WNWeFDK3FirAyHdnljj7rYDTvR7UiZIkkHkj l4HJ7guxdAM4RN/HUBKMqLvc1kmJwdh/2Yky9W4j9F5GhxKUNQo6AsT0CRoQLGCwpRc3 E4v42Hx7KIbUcCTQZgRSplrgf0xnaPcJ5wUeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j8m3iulbbmOBonY8EwcIMBEE9P+liKvxbRXAYUNAUMTv3cFG7t95WoqMr6W7WScEEV wziQir2MnNoHak2L/WfFSbZbLpAg2wZX4AzXqshGuZnWXpan7z0JmMgz8M2uwDqYMCxD FcElolrIgehI32aINy86XbkWQGvEt6d961MUY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.233.21 with SMTP id f21mr780238wfh.284.1280303722000; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.103.17 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:25:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop Cluster Configuration From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e04c8df273048c6df049 --000e0cd2e04c8df273048c6df049 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, While setting hadoop cluster, does configuration files (conf/core-site.xml, conf/mapred-site.xml,conf/hdfs-site.xml) in every node(name node and data nodes) needs to be configured in the same manner? How does configuration of name node differs from configuration of data nodes? Vaibhav Negi --000e0cd2e04c8df273048c6df049-- From general-return-1867-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 08:02:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77290 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 08:02:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 08:02:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 94484 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 08:02:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94353 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 08:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94345 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 08:02:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:02:23 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so4498579qyk.14 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2UqLgjNPZ2X4iWFt4TnZ0uL1iFm8wGUQ9Dv0RWxlliE=; b=b0Nhpic1TQ9F+bieG85MMkAvyQVO7MDXkzdstvZxtYwQT3r3RMfWvmLldMF0Nv7bPj lcg/CZeKiZs6ODqnrDuwYkLIzU+JI+T7hZm0dAgMqW6W/W6OQLccGQmC+I5kL0bkKhB4 3ZVq7TbGzLrOpK5fkEksYNZr9FxkcBpCdfkQY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=syfLIHmeRJc/FV+ZVWzXio/j8JFUXSM0wUmg4XYK23rn+7e9m7swnRUOqRUHJ0vV7l L5GuMho6z01cddGr2DJ2iBx+A2l5z+lOZc34VBLYnNn5H9isegEtHyuIvzcRBmSCNfu/ PiG52TRI+oXT2SHS3lAKg9D959cAIn0/PFcmU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.54.146 with SMTP id q18mr8234101qag.93.1280304122755; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.189.141 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:02:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:32:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Cluster Configuration From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vaibhav, > While setting hadoop cluster, does configuration files (conf/core-site.xm= l, > conf/mapred-site.xml,conf/hdfs-site.xml) in every node(name node and data > nodes) =A0needs to be configured in the same manner? This is a complicated question to answer :-). There are certain configuration variables that need to be defined to be the same between the master and the slaves and some that don't need to be. Pre Hadoop 0.21, there is no easy way other than documentation for the variables (hopefully) to determine if this is the case or not. I think in Hadoop 0.21 and since, we have tried to adopt a convention to include the daemon name to specify which variables are used by which daemons. And those that are cluster-wide, that need to be the same throughout all the nodes will have something like 'cluster' in the name. Your best bet in any case is possibly to sift through the documentation of the variables you are interested in. Or else to post a query here. > How does configuration of name node differs from configuration of data > nodes? Not sure about this one. Thanks hemanth From general-return-1868-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 08:44:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94272 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 08:44:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 08:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 31699 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 08:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31294 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 08:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31286 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 08:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:44:23 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so3541127pzk.35 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:44:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OAwVkAbi7pqIUHboPhG6B3s3SC99RwrmYCM8+jZWbyU=; b=w3FRENfSW+z0rJ+aKvRiG9YQ8GzDrZc1VwkP5qhMBdS+KJvL5DKjKmvipQxRoNEn+G czYyRc9Pgxd3l6W3sXLhZK0C+QkH94bCQjw/iChgHFpd3zUx+cG1T5bLdXjkn2O9B8SF kJ8Fr5aPL/09fp1WNz1OVbpWFYb9mmlAiUtvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rl3WXvScwcTAsRYm5Df0U25OBwqorQ8GonPyN6DKJV2Nsfu7vxP9HnA6iHFDvsTdpk eyQI7RxAC2oBdmBzveaF+1+Gad1TwDEALcS5eSc72btH2xjBIIG4CMfZR29mxbS3Stu/ LEfcCpQbV2BoMPPIcYV9q7Al3BBUY+AlNssS8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.155.13 with SMTP id c13mr820394wfe.288.1280306642689; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.103.17 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:44:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:14:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Cluster Configuration From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e458a41e52048c6e9ee6 --000e0cd2e458a41e52048c6e9ee6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am using hadoop versoion 0.20 . I am trying set up hadoop cluster. What are the configurations for name node? What are the configurations for data node? In documentation all configurations are given, but, it is not mentioned what needs to be configured for which node. Vaibhav Negi On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Vaibhav, > > > While setting hadoop cluster, does configuration files > (conf/core-site.xml, > > conf/mapred-site.xml,conf/hdfs-site.xml) in every node(name node and data > > nodes) needs to be configured in the same manner? > > This is a complicated question to answer :-). There are certain > configuration variables that need to be defined to be the same between > the master and the slaves and some that don't need to be. Pre Hadoop > 0.21, there is no easy way other than documentation for the variables > (hopefully) to determine if this is the case or not. I think in Hadoop > 0.21 and since, we have tried to adopt a convention to include the > daemon name to specify which variables are used by which daemons. And > those that are cluster-wide, that need to be the same throughout all > the nodes will have something like 'cluster' in the name. > > Your best bet in any case is possibly to sift through the > documentation of the variables you are interested in. Or else to post > a query here. > > > How does configuration of name node differs from configuration of data > > nodes? > > Not sure about this one. > > Thanks > hemanth > --000e0cd2e458a41e52048c6e9ee6-- From general-return-1869-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 17:09:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89081 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 17:09:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 17:09:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 81405 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:09:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81343 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:09:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81335 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 17:09:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:09:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.205] (HELO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:09:08 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.161.44]) by na3sys009aob111.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFBkHPCotnptxHtXyMKLNwNSzT2VEsSJ@postini.com; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:08:47 PDT Received: by mail-fx0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 1so1392474fxm.3 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:08:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.153.145 with SMTP id z17mr871958hbb.5.1280336922598; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.133.65 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:08:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sameer Joshi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7928676dd4e048c75ab53 --001485f7928676dd4e048c75ab53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sonal, Thank you for replying. I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the conf files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all Hadoop conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it locally, but still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as expected, it could not connect to server. Any thoughts? Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. Regards, Sameer On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal wrote: > Hi Sameer, > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and hostname > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you will get > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry like: > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > > Thanks and Regards, > Sonal > www.meghsoft.com > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine and > > starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException at > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop > wordcount > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and server > IP > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former > > followed by a server restart) > > > > Any thoughts? > > Thank you. > > > > > > The output is given below > > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets tests/out7 > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process > > : > > 1 > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > job_201007270544_0001 > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > > job_201007270544_0001 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > > > > -- > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > Senior computer scientist, > > Serene Software. > > > -- Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. Senior computer scientist, Serene Software. --001485f7928676dd4e048c75ab53-- From general-return-1870-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 28 17:21:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94576 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 17:21:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 17:21:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3327 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3217 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3209 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 17:21:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:21:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:21:03 +0000 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so4887485qyk.14 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IRRG5u9pVgI+RuCI1hPiaQDEoCibzOffFZhHsmZBikI=; b=TWEnn37YuxfR0yCjyO86FqcTl6jpuaEAF+Cl5vI3j+3n1QCPBzXXOWYcgTzjRs411M +AwurOdNZt24dUqLiTb+0KxwQErDeFUO6fpCcR8nXBKqRNgCD8zGv4gCz29tDqqK29Co Vy/O9kfM1h5BVqExnDJqVyyBDylg8Zy520V4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CjPpERWKjg1U8cJJFR12bCKi5oOEB7jAVsx/HFg1+qiVhaKYSy0W2TGswdyW0+T9jD V1DArVXNafeEdUDQdUsLOdfC+Ola2TJdv5eh1/HTpG4GvxEfiGiKDSw/Hhn4RjQAlQ3F dQptlYv/aobs4z++xkCYvx+Fd91IOyoDMHuJM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.56.195 with SMTP id z3mr4938108qag.41.1280337640488; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.232.67 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:20:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:50:40 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163613797d410028048c75d6df X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163613797d410028048c75d6df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sameer, Do you see all processes up? Can you check the logs and see what is going wrong? I suspect you will need to make the entries in /etc/hosts anyways. Somewhere in hadoop code, the ip hostname mapping is done, I forget the exact location. Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Joshi < sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > Hi Sonal, > Thank you for replying. > > I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the conf > files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all Hadoop > conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. > > I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it locally, but > still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as expected, it > could not connect to server. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. > > Regards, > Sameer > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal > wrote: > > > Hi Sameer, > > > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and > hostname > > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you will > get > > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry like: > > > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Sonal > > www.meghsoft.com > > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat > > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine > and > > > starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException at > > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop > > wordcount > > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > > > > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and > server > > IP > > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former > > > followed by a server restart) > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > The output is given below > > > > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets > tests/out7 > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process > > > : > > > 1 > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > > job_201007270544_0001 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > > > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > > > job_201007270544_0001 > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > > > > > > -- > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > > Senior computer scientist, > > > Serene Software. > > > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > Senior computer scientist, > Serene Software. > --00163613797d410028048c75d6df-- From general-return-1871-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 29 06:36:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93175 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2010 06:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2010 06:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 98761 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2010 06:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98399 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2010 06:36:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98391 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2010 06:36:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 74.125.82.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:36:15 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1246wyf.35 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.27.197 with SMTP id j5mr10852733wbc.111.1280385352651; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.135 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:35:52 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: OutOfMemoryError when writing a huge writable From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Yiftah Frechter Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022158bfd911ed5eb048c80f259 --0022158bfd911ed5eb048c80f259 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, My job uses 0.18 api (my cluster's hadoop version is 0.20.1), and I have my own set of nesting writables as input and output, some of them might be really big (memory wise). During the finishing steps of my reduce() function, When i call output.collect() on a particularly large writable, the task failes with a java heap space error: 2010-07-28 16:08:46,727 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Error running child : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2786) at java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream.write(ByteArrayOutputStream.java:94) at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeLong(DataOutputStream.java:207) at com.legolas.data.users.EntryWritable.write(EntryWritable.java:339) at com.legolas.data.users.UserWritable.write(UserWritable.java:1313) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableSerializer.serialize(WritableSerialization.java:90) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableSerializer.serialize(WritableSerialization.java:77) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Writer.append(SequenceFile.java:1006) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileOutputFormat$1.write(SequenceFileOutputFormat.java:75) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleOutputs$1.collect(MultipleOutputs.java:521) at com.legolas.data.users.UserReducer.reduce(UserReducer.java:267) at com.legolas.data.users.UserReducer.reduce(UserReducer.java:32) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.runOldReducer(ReduceTask.java:463) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:411) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) This failure was during writeLong(), but many other writes were made to the same stream before that call, on that specific instance of my object (it was a big one, i can tell because that specific output.collect only happens on very big objects). My first guess is that I should flush() the stream periodically during these big writes, and I want to know if hadoop's DataOutputStream supports flush(), as many other streams does not really pay attention to flush() calls (according to a java api on DataOutputStream's flush()) Does anyone know how can I outwit this problem and write by big writables without failure? Again, this only happens when I write() a perticularly large writable. Other write() operations ends without a problem. -- Oded --0022158bfd911ed5eb048c80f259-- From general-return-1872-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 30 18:55:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19166 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 72681 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2010 18:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72630 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2010 18:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72622 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2010 18:55:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:55:24 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so1144136pxi.35 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kMSckIhdygn41ppQTPbUjE+/huLNZSTU0+ErZQm9AD8=; b=HKYgTVi1uG9H+pyeDMPerSaWgb3xv8PcZaiKzplUr3/06MbYeeYoGRyLan3v0POln3 9LaQ9i8HvEqpPfkqIB1NJphuVCNLyZfb/mYLfjrBWZItcGQ9EO1Jag9bkUZ4MaCOo020 UpIGfykLww7dULXgPpPydxWnmtHIN/D9Nk9eQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=IJEQ7D4Hp11qBCR4PUbWLN6i8aNc49kscNSf31ISL6IwCHv+IMWWmgT4WxAT2IRIEN SGRSWjOxafEJAHVpwmeannaj5Wap73R0h3rSoja9mIXYxlEHBW+ucYVwDCprDj2EAPjx JgBWNRXQrHk58ie583OeWzJOJ7bfFCdH2Z2ow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.194.15 with SMTP id r15mr2084472wff.274.1280516104558; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.154.6 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:55:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kg3Kkqs5XjlTa1OLTuvujmcGifY Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.20.6 available for download From: Stack To: user@hbase.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HBase 0.20.6 is available for download: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/releases.html The Release Notes are available here: http://su.pr/2itvaW We recommend that all users, particularly those running 0.20.4, upgrade. Thanks to all who contributed to this release. Yours, The HBasistas From general-return-1873-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 31 07:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67210 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2010 07:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Jul 2010 07:38:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82598 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2010 07:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82008 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2010 07:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82000 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2010 07:38:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:38:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.199] (HELO na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:38:00 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.161.45]) by na3sys009aob108.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFPSwUBg7ElVmHhw7oratp4F9EUn1ulW@postini.com; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:37:39 PDT Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so441709fxm.18 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:37:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.165.9 with SMTP id v9mr165185hbd.93.1280561856222; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.156.195 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:37:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:37:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sameer Joshi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f794de8d9698048caa0a6e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f794de8d9698048caa0a6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sonal, Sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. The logs, unfortunately, did not yield too much information. I'll try some more configurations with etc/hosts edits, and see if I can't get it to behave. Thanks so much again for your help. Sameer On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Sonal Goyal wrote: > Hi Sameer, > > Do you see all processes up? Can you check the logs and see what is going > wrong? I suspect you will need to make the entries in /etc/hosts anyways. > Somewhere in hadoop code, the ip hostname mapping is done, I forget the > exact location. > > Thanks and Regards, > Sonal > www.meghsoft.com > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Joshi < > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi Sonal, > > Thank you for replying. > > > > I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the conf > > files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all > Hadoop > > conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. > > > > I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it locally, > but > > still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as expected, > it > > could not connect to server. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. > > > > Regards, > > Sameer > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Sameer, > > > > > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and > > hostname > > > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you will > > get > > > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry like: > > > > > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > Sonal > > > www.meghsoft.com > > > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < > > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat > > > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine > > and > > > > starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException > at > > > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop > > > wordcount > > > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > > > > > > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and > > server > > > IP > > > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > > > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former > > > > followed by a server restart) > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > The output is given below > > > > > > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets > > tests/out7 > > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > > process > > > > : > > > > 1 > > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > > > job_201007270544_0001 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > > > > > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > > > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > > > > job_201007270544_0001 > > > > > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 > > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > > > Senior computer scientist, > > > > Serene Software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > Senior computer scientist, > > Serene Software. > > > -- Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. Senior computer scientist, Serene Software. --001485f794de8d9698048caa0a6e-- From general-return-204-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 01 14:10:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60264 invoked from network); 1 May 2009 14:10:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2009 14:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 55523 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 14:10:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55466 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 14:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55456 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 14:10:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 14:10:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hadoop@anarres.org designates 62.49.9.82 as permitted sender) Received: from [62.49.9.82] (HELO pink.anarres.org) (62.49.9.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 14:10:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.3.16] by pink.anarres.org with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1LztR9-00060Y-Dd for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 01 May 2009 15:09:59 +0100 Subject: Re: Implementing compareTo in user-written keys where one extends the other is error prone From: Shevek To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49FA18B1.8090701@schor.com> References: <49FA18B1.8090701@schor.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 15:09:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1241186969.13412.27.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Karma: 999: Found in custom ip4 whitelist X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, I'll pull out the pertinent bits of your mail, please excuse the extreme trimming, and explain why this happened at the bottom. On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:31 -0400, Marshall Schor wrote: A superclass which sorts on a String field: > public class Super implements WritableComparable { A subclass: > public class Sub extends Super { > . . . > public int compareTo(Sub o) { > What actually happened, was that the sort on the boolean value was > skipped completely, and only the sort on the string was done. [SNIP] > ... they are passed via this code in > WritableComparator: > > public int compare(WritableComparable a, WritableComparable b) { > return a.compareTo(b); > } > > Java uses the interface spec for WritableComparable that was declared, > in this case WritableComparable, and infers that the arg type for > the compareTo is Super. So it "skips" calling the compareTo in Sub, and > just calls the one in Super. Right. > The workaround is to change the signature of Sub's compareTo method to > match the spec in the interface, namely it has to take the Super as an > argument, and then cast it to Sub. Right. (As you'll see in a minute, this is what the JVM does anyway, but starting from Object.) > This seems like a very error prone design. Am I doing something wrong, > or can this be improved so that this kind of error is avoided? Yes, you're doing something wrong. You are misunderstanding type erasure and its implementation in Java. At the simplest level, this class implements Comparable but never implements Comparable, and the method compare(Sub o) is NOT AN OVERRIDE. I haven't tested, but if you make Sub implement Comparable, it might work as you intend. If in doubt, and in any case where you believe a method to override another method, USE THE @Override ANNOTATION. In fact, if someone were to go through every Java 5 codebase in the world and add @Override everywhere pertinent, it would be an improvement. Even in C++, I don't think this method combination would be a dynamic override. You'd be relying on enough static type information to be available to let the compiler determine the Sub-call, which it probably wouldn't. With the rant over, let's look at why this particular confusion happens. Type erasure means that in the class file, Comparable drops its parameters. Java does not know whether it's a Comparable
or a Comparable, and if it all goes wrong, you'll get a runtime ClassCastException just as you would have in old-land. The actual method is still compareTo(Object), and so when we write a method compareTo(Super), how does it get called? The answer is that the Java compiler compiles an extra hidden method compareTo(Object) which forwards to compareTo(Super). I happen to have the following example lying around, so I'll use it: abstract class Functor { public abstract O eval(I x); } Remember this is really Object eval(Object x) since Object is the type bound for both I and O. class MyFunctor extends Functor { @Override public String eval(String in) { return in; } } Now, let's compile both classes and have a look: Method name:"eval" public Signature: (java.lang.String)java.lang.String Attribute "Code", length:26, max_stack:1, max_locals:2, code_length:2 0: aload_1 1: areturn That's our expected eval method. Method name:"eval" public volatile Signature: (java.lang.Object)java.lang.Object Attribute "Code", length:33, max_stack:2, max_locals:2, code_length:9 0: aload_0 1: aload_1 2: checkcast 5: invokevirtual 8: areturn This is an EXTRA method compiled by javac because the compile time type information tells it that eval(String) is an implementation of eval(Object) because of the relationship created by the type variables I and O. Note the extra checkcast, and that this method has an attribute of volatile (which is interestingly not documented as a valid method attribute in the JVM spec). In the case of Comparable, if you dump your class file, you will find that compareTo(Object) forwards to compareTo(Super), hence the a.compareTo(b) call calls compareTo(Super) and at no point does anything know to call compareTo(Sub). Either way, an @Override annotation will tell you at compile-time whether you got it right, and I'm a firm believer in knowing whether your code will work BEFORE deployment. S. From general-return-205-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 01 20:30:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57986 invoked from network); 1 May 2009 20:30:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2009 20:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1904 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1862 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65668 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 20:14:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of asachdeva@attributor.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:13:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Anshuman Sachdeva To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <376870849.6850791241208826390.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.mindcentric.com> Subject: du command hangs the machine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [99.35.134.13] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.6_GA_2313.RHEL4_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/5.0.6_GA_2313.RHEL4_64) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, My engineers have seen this issue. After every few days the node hangs. we are using xfs file system and when ever hadoop runs "du" command and the data on the file system is really high and it some how locks the directory and we end up rebooting the machine. A help or guidance from any one will be helpful Thanks From general-return-206-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 01 20:34:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58431 invoked from network); 1 May 2009 20:34:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2009 20:34:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 4263 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:34:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4197 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4186 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 20:34:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:34:14 +0000 Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mENt1b0040cZkys53LZmbt; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:33:46 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mLZl1b00E2SbwD53WLZoZU; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:33:52 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <376870849.6850791241208826390.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.mindcentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: du command hangs the machine Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:33:44 -0700 References: <376870849.6850791241208826390.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.mindcentric.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 1, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Anshuman Sachdeva wrote: > Hi All, > My engineers have seen this issue. After every few days the > node hangs. we are using xfs file system and when ever hadoop runs > "du" command and the data on the file system is really high and it > some how locks the directory and we end up rebooting the machine. > > A help or guidance from any one will be helpful Probably the best way to solve the problem is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4998 It would be great to have native libraries that provide the functionality we need without forking at all. -- Owen From general-return-207-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 01 20:38:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59591 invoked from network); 1 May 2009 20:38:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2009 20:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14044 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:38:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13981 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 20:38:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13956 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 20:38:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gtsafas.bb@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.243 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.243] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 20:38:38 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so1473329anc.29 for ; Fri, 01 May 2009 13:38:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id :return-receipt-to:message-id:reply-to:x-priority:sensitivity :importance:subject:to:from:date:content-type:mime-version; bh=7weXhHPFrfRF8u/NT1FoBb0VssXRYWleETVkdO93rGM=; b=ILTQNhFOUpyy6q2eK/F6cFkayyzqUDY8qtShtwae3lSie0Qqp3KnCq4BCf1MW/FtlY gize5gBt21hLacy8BXGs5yeqDMyM5zvXSQ7b6lFIR3RwZUmnfHPiTtW2eJgzUzI6kee5 YdnAdnNp7hB1lPnhU8e4W2mvbUuPIa3IGjuyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:return-receipt-to:message-id:reply-to :x-priority:sensitivity:importance:subject:to:from:date:content-type :mime-version; b=IkDtq73IBLOTyqqMtdnU5377qYpw7i4ofQpJQK2WhEQtGiZmMUbc1N0vjFR3JiEhw4 peWc+/1hHDbq3EBRUTbisr39YjeOQTTQ9MKZEvadVme7lHjx9Yy6t1V4J8KtGxWMuzOE pWBWbjFhdHLAkjhpEEzTzHllcimYMksZBQ+Fs= Received: by 10.100.171.7 with SMTP id t7mr262563ane.33.1241210297644; Fri, 01 May 2009 13:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bda739.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (e739.bda.bis.na.blackberry.com [67.223.79.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm371548anc.9.2009.05.01.13.38.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 May 2009 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT) X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:1997177994 Message-ID:<1997177994-1241210293-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-255471184-@bxe1026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Reply-To: gtsafas.bb@gmail.com X-Priority: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal Subject: Beginer To: general@hadoop.apache.org From: gtsafas.bb@gmail.com Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 20:40:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everyone, I am new to hadoop. My company is looking into using it. I am trying to get an idea of it but some of the literature is beyond my comprehension. If someone would not mind giving me an easier explanation I would appreciate it. Thank you. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From general-return-208-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 01 21:28:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79233 invoked from network); 1 May 2009 21:28:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2009 21:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 88840 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 21:28:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88774 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2009 21:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88764 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 21:28:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 21:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.225] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 21:28:19 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1653115rvb.29 for ; Fri, 01 May 2009 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jGPuiK+RLoBaJktWfLukBUdDocmAVvFI6RVDrZvB0sU=; b=Tl0cX1T29ZYpN0uajxhq47+yTMDplMpZW+5HOPFmcruEKaDx+U6MrMl5QNvlKGBV9Y 7odhXPTk28YHvlXYcNBs1Gbwo7oyXgz4O8z5RiMwUP+hXGZf/0BmctcX9Of2Q3i93wEy /aERc9j+tCtLqC1U5heLbXe2UrjFS7lG3li48= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Jxzo6gBt0AmJJu0NTRje7b7iG7TqNIINSu76P9T5wd4LB637BnlErJIhOWtRBOj2tR h7VQWD/a1OSx844UCZrjIYEjQ0Mn7y6cP4WQHI/xfJZ/aeEyekyL53TvT5ke39c0LwUb CgY1ryXBWXg//KcUQeavqBBl55adEQoDtQGdY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.147.1 with SMTP id u1mr2394098wad.115.1241213277859; Fri, 01 May 2009 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <376870849.6850791241208826390.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.mindcentric.com> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:27:57 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690905011427i5abcba80l65f633a7f49482c8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: du command hangs the machine From: jason hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c5baf8472970468e07c0e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364c5baf8472970468e07c0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is a particular problem with XFS that I have only seen on PAE kernels that can cause XFS deadlocks, on top of the long duration du issue. We never had a solution but it only seemed to happen on the machines with the PAE kernels (32 bit kernels with larger than 4gig of physical ram in the machine). On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On May 1, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Anshuman Sachdeva wrote: > > Hi All, >> My engineers have seen this issue. After every few days the node >> hangs. we are using xfs file system and when ever hadoop runs "du" command >> and the data on the file system is really high and it some how locks the >> directory and we end up rebooting the machine. >> >> A help or guidance from any one will be helpful >> > > Probably the best way to solve the problem is: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4998 > > It would be great to have native libraries that provide the functionality > we need without forking at all. > > -- Owen > -- Alpha Chapters of my book on Hadoop are available http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430219422 --0016364c5baf8472970468e07c0e-- From general-return-209-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 02 18:30:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84460 invoked from network); 2 May 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 15022 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2009 18:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14945 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2009 18:30:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82305 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2009 22:39:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vijay2win@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=TQGRypiqU7W7EW3U556BIHyuyTOLW/ZBvCwrV+L94Xo=; b=VztvMmZasyrrtLibo0BYp0ab2He6Ym85iIFWdTYe+gtVLgZizXENT7R8ms6DLclabq SSFLMcmlVC3p8l/nF2xKNcOpnRimXe7fT7kxGVwM1/RaWCIpmv9QXbYlacYsTZd5hTG8 97jSm5izr8UHcsrEsVHnR6/p76g90EjOgCXJk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=j3jwU2HKJk0HZ4JpgwW3cGQ4BeKRezqBqP9ijYkF962RnjKPn5M48WjDTaHEiecl5q rtxFkyzbxGvpX6gueYhgIT9hyr2XnDciKJB0rUMCbeTUxMam5hBj0klKxyr4e3btkmVS 3lUlmKJd1r8ImwIOozS4vwgeiojD85proHPvg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1997177994-1241210293-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-255471184-@bxe1026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <1997177994-1241210293-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-255471184-@bxe1026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> From: Vijay Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:38:49 -0700 Message-ID: <9b40bc2a0905011538x63342e9dm3cdea5b0ae74aacd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Beginer To: general@hadoop.apache.org, gtsafas.bb@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e645b83c1bda190468e17b02 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e645b83c1bda190468e17b02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Simple way to explain is..... Think abt it, if you have million things to do to complete a One JOB..... To get that done you will divide it to 10 * 100 K things.... Send it 100K server to do the job individually (Map Job) Get the data back from it and run a reduce job which will combine all the results and at the end you have the results of those million things.... Doing the same thing without any Loss of data or loss of processing time by redundancy etc.... What you gain? It is like your car with 4 Cyl or 6 Cyl or even 8 Cyl in it..... :) the above is Just a simple over view or a 1min summary :) Well this is my way of interpreting it. Regards, On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am new to hadoop. My company is looking into using it. I am trying to get > an idea of it but some of the literature is beyond my comprehension. If > someone would not mind giving me an easier explanation I would appreciate > it. > > Thank you. > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > --0016e645b83c1bda190468e17b02-- From general-return-210-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 05 21:15:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56641 invoked from network); 5 May 2009 21:15:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2009 21:15:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 1067 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2009 21:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 690 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2009 21:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 644 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2009 21:15:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 21:15:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 21:15:09 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n45LBSsC074162; Tue, 5 May 2009 14:11:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=AjRq4vAIB8m51XbGXqMJLch5g9NunMb0zUoAFSUTaOEQQh/2sMmJRNel0Rt2/yYU Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 5 May 2009 14:11:27 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9CDC5.EADEC5E7" Subject: Hadoop Summit 2009 - Open for registration Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:10:28 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop Summit 2009 - Open for registration Thread-Index: AcnNxepSpOFHRec4RX+Djty21JFqUg== From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2009 21:11:27.0991 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E0FE070:01C9CDC6] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9CDC5.EADEC5E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This year's Hadoop Summit (http://developer.yahoo.com/events/hadoopsummit09/) is confirmed for June 10th at the Santa Clara Marriott, and is now open for registration. =20 We have a packed agenda, with three tracks - for developers, administrators, and one focused on new and innovative applications using Hadoop. The presentations include talks from Amazon, IBM, Sun, Cloudera, Facebook, HP, Microsoft, and the Yahoo! team, as well as leading universities including UC Berkeley, CMU, Cornell, U of Maryland, U of Nebraska and SUNY. =20 >From our experience last year with the rush for seats, I would encourage people to register early at http://hadoopsummit09.eventbrite.com/ =20 Looking forward to seeing you at the summit! =20 Ajay ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9CDC5.EADEC5E7-- From general-return-211-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 06 01:42:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61437 invoked from network); 6 May 2009 01:42:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2009 01:42:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 64482 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 01:42:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64372 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 01:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54759 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2009 01:26:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:25:47 +0900 Message-ID: <69035570905051825m2dbb6ddejae7d9e5846c21214@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Free Training at 2009 Hadoop Summit From: Christophe Bisciglia To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64714c46ca856046934467d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64714c46ca856046934467d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just wanted to follow up on this and let everyone know that Cloudera and Y! are teaming up to offer two day-long training sessions for free on the day after the summit (June 11th). We'll cover Hadoop basics, Pig, Hive and some new tools Cloudera is releasing for importing data to Hadoop from existing databases. http://hadoopsummit09-training.eventbrite.com Each of these sessions normally runs about $1000 but were taking advantage of having so much of the Hadoop community in one place and offering this fo= r free at the 2009 Hadoop Summit. Basic training is appropriate for people just getting started with Hadoop, and the advanced training will focus on augmenting your existing infrastructure with Hadoop and taking advantage of Hadoop's advanced features and related projects. Space is limited, so sign up before time runs out. Hope to see you there! Christophe and the Cloduera Team On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Ajay Anand wrote: > This year=92s Hadoop Summit > (http://developer.yahoo.com/events/hadoopsummit09/) is confirmed for June > 10th at the Santa Clara Marriott, and is now open for registration. > > > > We have a packed agenda, with three tracks =96 for developers, administrators, > and one focused on new and innovative applications using Hadoop. The > presentations include talks from Amazon, IBM, Sun, Cloudera, Facebook, HP= , > Microsoft, and the Yahoo! team, as well as leading universities including UC > Berkeley, CMU, Cornell, U of Maryland, U of Nebraska and SUNY. > > > > From our experience last year with the rush for seats, I would encourage > people to register early at http://hadoopsummit09.eventbrite.com/ > > > > Looking forward to seeing you at the summit! > > > > Ajay --=20 get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera --0016e64714c46ca856046934467d-- From general-return-212-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 06 07:37:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73921 invoked from network); 6 May 2009 07:37:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2009 07:37:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 33823 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 07:37:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33697 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 07:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33678 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2009 07:37:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:37:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:37:13 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so2893240ywe.29 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 00:36:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Lqz8mCIcYDCj+GY43o/Vjwwh8331Pn3axggOfKqk33s=; b=ZEnMIN3d1RPPunkMusgcJn0lbJsJVZlzf/WLBymck+1pKLbASe3Yc4DAa5SSFTBkEe 649nEzbX4GpFgeoQvytkBFI2smeCo4QOBJLjfOf5gArOzR2Xh3JdwqkDK4dZSlV09pvw +Dxy8uMoJWO4qIX36HoM/Qtfa4o5baknAlCyE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dXqH5BHRR00hdEpsGHp6bTS7H4wj2hd2Q5eUlOTcEsYimfz2FULoAhkW7XmOYxZRo+ ACtsfFGqH2JkwavniJvnnsl/g4LriH4qUkBJhJtW5YPfypi2zIPV6Itz9JSxvdvRXM5m TmrC2pTe70LKLbJOtoclq1S+wm0EAcAgXSFgs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.69.2 with SMTP id w2mr190401ybk.190.1241595411928; Wed, 06 May 2009 00:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:36:51 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905060036u2f1f03aamd4d7cb532be8ec6b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: On usig Eclipse IDE From: George Pang To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f1a3c7b957104693975b8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f1a3c7b957104693975b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Users, I configure Eclipse Europa according to Yahoo tutorial on hadoop: http://public.yahoo.com/gogate/hadoop-tutorial/html/module3.html and in the instruction it goes about creating new DFS Location: =93=85..Next, click on the =93Advanced=94 tab. There are two settings here = which must be changed. Scroll down to hadoop.job.ugi. It contains your current Windows login credentials. Highlight the first comma-separated value in this list (your username) and replace it with hadoop-user.=94 I can=92t find this attribute(hadoop.job.ugi) in the advance list from =93D= efine Hadoop location=94 on Eclipse. Do you have an idea? My hadoop is installed on VM ware. Thank you, fast reply will be much appreciated. George --001e680f1a3c7b957104693975b8-- From general-return-213-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 06 17:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51375 invoked from network); 6 May 2009 17:07:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2009 17:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 69045 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 17:07:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68601 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 17:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68484 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2009 17:06:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 17:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.29] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 17:06:31 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so118199yxm.29 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QFrD38FW8rzRpw5ud8/z2iG/a+J21PGUhb+tRw8F1e4=; b=vcmp8ets6JugikdDe513Rv9KqSoyRBTR5C53VLC9XTydvZ1v+xN8eH6hbbGnHnVE6o aAvkeMJw+ULykrZhwtzSnzTK/T9iSWjQjYdrrClZmXf/y5uqr7NM8RRqT7IOiTXs1OA8 kyESoAs3q9bR/mLgcSa8c2xNKDGMa44moe0Do= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kfqrdhhSLemIeU2lXt5ja+rn/pkPN6Dnbok9pqFjTtlP+SfNtLhExkkV9RezM+WlIZ j3nqrJGwDgcm9TxiYNqZaE+N6uDHHzvJqG+kiRF/SlOZeWQqYwIMf/kUE5q5pKeQs9Wu OSEt0mkxtN3QapLIXjIRj01vGM1GhNNCFx0xM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.133.9 with SMTP id k9mr1290209ybn.51.1241629570558; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9c39bdeb0905060036u2f1f03aamd4d7cb532be8ec6b@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c39bdeb0905060036u2f1f03aamd4d7cb532be8ec6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:06:10 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905061006j1b315e0fkc91bbaaad50be5c7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: On usig Eclipse IDE From: George Pang To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f18047eecfa04694169b0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f18047eecfa04694169b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Or, is there a way to know who is the author of that tutorial from Yahoo on hadoop / Eclipse? Thanks George 2009/5/6 George Pang > Dear Users, > > I configure Eclipse Europa according to Yahoo tutorial on hadoop: > http://public.yahoo.com/gogate/hadoop-tutorial/html/module3.html > > and in the instruction it goes about creating new DFS Location: > > =93=85..Next, click on the =93Advanced=94 tab. There are two settings her= e which > must be changed. > > Scroll down to hadoop.job.ugi. It contains your current Windows login > credentials. Highlight the first comma-separated value in this list (your > username) and replace it with hadoop-user.=94 > > I can=92t find this attribute(hadoop.job.ugi) in the advance list from > =93Define Hadoop location=94 on Eclipse. Do you have an idea? > > My hadoop is installed on VM ware. > > Thank you, fast reply will be much appreciated. > > George > --001e680f18047eecfa04694169b0-- From general-return-214-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 08 07:40:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14181 invoked from network); 8 May 2009 07:40:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 May 2009 07:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 76671 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2009 07:40:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76187 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2009 07:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75919 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2009 07:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 07:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.31] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 07:40:34 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so731381ywe.29 for ; Fri, 08 May 2009 00:40:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nIR6jqU8qcbDg+OjE3CJaD0SAXb6587Kf/JXCCOaI6A=; b=Mc3JglebiQth3oEIU7/WwLBhuyJ224FK6yG+j55biJEgMY3yr2uTlvhSI2K51da5Qa OrW6Fic990uwVMOfpFVUs522muDNDQcoBRxatGIalwNfXAZrcHhLeSPtboWIe76g5gp8 HE1nwqq4hpV+965giZCDZmszABRp3SvHJFRu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DzmgAtVMXmr3n9JpWZ8+Z9nvoJ2i223l6ktVVUSelOPNwKcNR71ek/X469EUX7a7S4 0tDA/UustQpicxJenVX7ROxCqRV+fPXbKo3NdZnxYCX7EoVX2HuVFmba1Gq2AFOMAi0q rAaKdzkaQG7xDWjDhqsFaUX68CayaPDv//4cI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.129.8 with SMTP id g8mr6116450ybn.104.1241768413683; Fri, 08 May 2009 00:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:40:13 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905080040q6cc61652u6135eec4c63b3ff@mail.gmail.com> Subject: ClassNotFoundException From: George Pang To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f10f030e38b046961bd8e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f10f030e38b046961bd8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear users, I got "ClassNotFoundException" when run the WordCount example on hadoop using Eclipse. Does anyone know where is the problem? Thank you! George --001e680f10f030e38b046961bd8e-- From general-return-215-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 08 18:52:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22791 invoked from network); 8 May 2009 18:52:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 May 2009 18:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 92844 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2009 18:52:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92790 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2009 18:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92780 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2009 18:52:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 18:52:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vijay2win@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.229] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 18:52:36 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1211007rvb.29 for ; Fri, 08 May 2009 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=YIXa5alnnVr0fy8GKf+KevCEq55e4k5rrvSa7zv9dBA=; b=iqRSS41ux/ZiOIOzEuhk3nQNH/kuBoy21yC13bW1hgjYc0Vk8OlI9Gc2escJICNfE7 QwS+ExFk4aZTQAPAtwYcuhKajGdf7U3lC65dYxxAYeJUCC/XrHf2MwWAekaHjLbDGW4+ E1tVCT8u7OSlNpgrUvVjjSJIZvn5vfic2M0UA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=LgM1q8TaoSgRoDW6JsmssmS0r7vqfzpBhw1KdlyBeSG2N7gEp0ErI+cBt3dsK4dyso ITeVFz1k5BWFgAeUjuCBkrHFFXJ+j7RPKuJV1mBQldWEZTKP1wTshJKaTV+YH8XyOzY7 x/+6KGjnFNk+0dLB51qqi+nTW31+T2cLhBMc8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.131.11 with SMTP id e11mr3642095wad.75.1241808734342; Fri, 08 May 2009 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Vijay Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:51:54 -0700 Message-ID: <9b40bc2a0905081151r2a1fd1batdce5ed97f8d337e5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: File system filling with Logs - Hadoop+ Chukwa To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c5b2f7d4f3304696b2073 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364c5b2f7d4f3304696b2073 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am trying out Chukwa on HDFS and the filesystem is been filled up because of the amount of logs been generated by hadoop filesystem, Can anyone help me understand why this is happening and how can i reduce the speed atleast? awapisvr:qawapiall:root > df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 19234 7987 10270 44% / /dev/sda1 282 24 243 9% /boot none 3983 0 3983 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda3 38459 903 35604 3% /opt /dev/sda8 338395 43645 277561 14% /spare /dev/sda7 19234 77 18180 1% /tmp /dev/sda5 38459 1701 34805 5% /var 64.68.126.215:/vol/vol2/logarchive 286720 52678 234043 19% /backup awapisvr:qawapiall:root > df -m Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 19234 7987 10270 44% / /dev/sda1 282 24 243 9% /boot none 3983 0 3983 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda3 38459 903 35604 3% /opt /dev/sda8 338395 43648 277559 14% /spare /dev/sda7 19234 77 18180 1% /tmp /dev/sda5 38459 1701 34805 5% /var 64.68.126.215:/vol/vol2/logarchive 286720 52678 234043 19% /backup in matter of millisec i see the below in the logs... 2009-05-08 18:50:38,351 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null 2009-05-08 18:50:38,352 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null 2009-05-08 18:50:38,352 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null 2009-05-08 18:50:38,352 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null 2009-05-08 18:50:38,352 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null 2009-05-08 18:50:38,353 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=listStatus src=/chukwa/dataSinkArchives dst=nullperm=null and 28527974-127.0.0.1-50010-1241721203027, blockid: blk_-4466028835570444014_1290 2009-05-08 18:48:54,137 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: PacketResponder 0 for block blk_-4466028835570444014_1290 terminating 2009-05-08 18:50:33,139 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_-7272993078256778328_1291 src: /127.0.0.1:57067 dest: /127.0.0.1:50010 2009-05-08 18:50:34,222 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: / 127.0.0.1:57067, dest: /127.0.0.1:50010, bytes: 69046, op: HDFS_WRITE, cliID: DFSClient_-223712422, srvID: DS-2128527974-127.0.0.1-50010-1241721203027, blockid: blk_-7272993078256778328_1291 2009-05-08 18:50:34,223 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: PacketResponder 0 for block blk_-7272993078256778328_1291 terminating 2009-05-08 18:50:35,145 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_-2496183264937203840_1292 src: /127.0.0.1:57136 dest: /127.0.0.1:50010 2009-05-08 18:50:41,920 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_2625289997411230424_1240 Regards, --0016364c5b2f7d4f3304696b2073-- From general-return-216-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 09 07:43:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30986 invoked from network); 9 May 2009 07:43:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2009 07:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 35639 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2009 07:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35588 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2009 07:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35578 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2009 07:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 May 2009 07:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.191] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 May 2009 07:43:21 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so170810tif.9 for ; Sat, 09 May 2009 00:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=coYLSJcGj6IWBzKz0kxDSiHaYX6mnALU6o5TagV72lo=; b=F7H+/TmmJQ5Nd7yoUxlZ7GPIuVqab0BNHPFkwrp7/Ie9mhJzUMZWQAJI3ioPQ2lGDd 6ZAHIulk1oLuH6xrZlf1YeS9+ivfXYMTDKYHS+sb3p/YAN24tAfOj8srn2QcfNNczvMe wtzxCW7ZkNwEkYOKIhN6j9+SuxS6QieV7ovzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=oWcdlfSp7+VgznlguDYTqlbGS3LnTsl1HvaMlugVaVa4wHVThqK6741bdIncEd/uwZ a8cyIm+zXH9VNJVP3FKomRSXhWufF3cjyIh8s3K99gpcjT5eEhha4SMpbWD5IvRGHYTo fRTLI3T8Z0azhk6TORL6Oi3F5A8K0u9NEK38g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.47.17 with SMTP id u17mr312256tiu.41.1241854979532; Sat, 09 May 2009 00:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 13:12:59 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df20905090042g1050facfv9074f87799b97df0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Problem Configuring Hadoop Eclipse Plugin From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e652f56aeae882046975e411 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e652f56aeae882046975e411 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am trying to configure hadoop eclipse plugin 0.19.1 but getting the following exception An internal error occurred during: "Connecting to DFS Test". java.lang.IllegalStateException Please help -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, --0016e652f56aeae882046975e411-- From general-return-217-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 09 18:32:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43750 invoked from network); 9 May 2009 18:32:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2009 18:32:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12819 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2009 18:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12717 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2009 18:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12707 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2009 18:32:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 May 2009 18:32:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.199.177] (HELO web301.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.199.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 09 May 2009 18:31:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 76533 invoked by uid 60001); 9 May 2009 18:31:33 -0000 Message-ID: <672699.72731.qm@web301.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1cVt6gQVM1nxtMjzLo0K9awlLfcCRUe3jr6A5eLSlNBAOefQyT8n8wyHMWy14vJEdIuw4bomEM2nkSCpJ0EzbIyUyl2sBuAAuST2s.onMeO3_W7tnGeaamq5JHFwEVUwqZB6Qj4Hmu.F6O_5cx30.J_3dSOt821CULWtRPq7csnCYmaypl8kS.aBBeKTeJMfHphWGTeTg6UEpxokwlfMTF6A_zOC043637RdaFOnEZ9dLNn44lTtgvO_sBoHLocUqeVUI4.Bldr0VOAUnIYjdQqiuuxhpxKMlt7qFsiT7AZ_71IsolpTuQztF99RZiQnIW02cUmOze9jfVFEEmkKWu4.xo71CN5hZpju296D Received: from [216.103.210.17] by web301.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 09 May 2009 11:31:33 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10 Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 11:31:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Bonesata Subject: (event) How Hadoop Enables Big Data for Every Enterprise To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Registration: http://www.meetup.com/CIO-IT-Executives/calendar/10266376/ Do you have too much data? Do you find yourself discarding data due to performance and cost considerations? Have you heard about Hadoop, but find yourself wondering how it fits with the rest of your systems? Come here the answers to these questions and more at Cloudera's office on Tuesday May 19th. This talk will provide a high level, mildly technical overview of Hadoop and existing architectures for working with large volumes of data. We'll pay special attention to how to augment your existing systems with Hadoop so each can focus on what they do best. Working together, they can deliver a more powerful, scalable, and robust solution. Our speaker: Christophe Bisciglia, Founder, Cloudera Dinner will be served. From general-return-218-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 12 05:14:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56090 invoked from network); 12 May 2009 05:14:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2009 05:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27093 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:14:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27003 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:14:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25106 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2009 07:24:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mingzong.lyu@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.242 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ythkSnELKcv52qShYOV+YOijGX6oWMWdNH8e2jGtfeM=; b=f2vA5dij9ief3f8m4NVfbwTqh6eqfX+J92E/alFv1MSD1AEek/nITS4WSfMCX9MA5z 6mk/6C75nGceA3C4KhTeCRpSD/L7WhMOA1SBHdbcul6r29b8EjthpadDRwO73bx4yuTc XL0cTWJz+YHyfs6R6M4Wm/dWGREtSpErZxYik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uvOE2HsS7Bh2xUe/sDaoAbSRJIFQdc/ejZQXv4M0wtBoLaN+1sNv3TuavXJvelsgP5 j9hfABz30amQGq7Tx46qRlRNTL5VZ4kVYRR49+1I+2O8SoPktyLMT0GmH7UT0ynV68SH YfJzztmFrs0xWUw5PccfaMeI3b4InSUflVDHw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:24:15 +0800 Message-ID: <11bb374e0905090024r20492097x64fe81da4037bb2a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: A Question of Hadoop From: Dylan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6441f3aedc62b046975a154 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6441f3aedc62b046975a154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! My name is Ming-Zong.LYU. I have setup Hadoop some advanced question. first question: Settings where time of death datanode? Is dfs.heartbeat.interval? Second question: How to setup more than two namenode and how do I setup hfs? How can i do? Can you help me ? --0016e6441f3aedc62b046975a154-- From general-return-219-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 12 05:22:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59859 invoked from network); 12 May 2009 05:22:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2009 05:22:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 31966 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31881 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31871 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2009 05:22:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 05:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of starrysl@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.185] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 05:22:18 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so312716tif.9 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:21:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=inf1FNOdlnvCM36JGHfHGL+xQ+g7Amwe9WU3LIRYEZM=; b=NMLK6qAnnMa3vIwGBZEXDPSC9YO4H8VcAHDVOuhwUfKx4eA/qRSBWv3POjZx9qA/0P 2sb2GLOKwA/OnDBxkMon9/kGWXQdCI4nFD2Na4vbqmtxApQFOTTKGQ/6JQga24Aoqidm yRGVYkBOPjd3bW9dQ37lRiAW4ThbYqxcoMo5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uYfgWO8+SjrHdAZS8QFucBeIpZSynCxALs2cBt+Yk5BQGyre0qxS6VL2QdMg28MfYg eSHm1RvFoFAmtADHcq9nFl+xjleT7OaYTTwNvcDb0qE1IK9k46BTxkfRl0btAYGZA0iH uZcmJ+5q1h3DOYKm4ZDXXnUuJQl7Df2A685Sg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.95.11 with SMTP id s11mr512714tib.24.1242105716080; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:21:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11bb374e0905090024r20492097x64fe81da4037bb2a@mail.gmail.com> References: <11bb374e0905090024r20492097x64fe81da4037bb2a@mail.gmail.com> From: Starry SHI Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:21:36 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A Question of Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mingzong.lyu@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Dylan. About the second question, why do you need more than 2 namenode? I think one node for namenode is enough for processing, or the interaction and synchronization will be a big problem. Best regards, Starry /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 15:24, Dylan wrote: > Hi! My name is Ming-Zong.LYU. > I have setup Hadoop some advanced question. > > > first question: > Settings where time of death datanode? > Is dfs.heartbeat.interval? > Second question: > How to setup more than two namenode and how do I setup hfs? > How can i do? > > Can you help me ? > From general-return-220-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 12 05:27:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62569 invoked from network); 12 May 2009 05:27:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2009 05:27:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 34885 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:27:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34759 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 05:27:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34730 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2009 05:27:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 05:27:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of starrysl@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.190] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 05:27:45 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so313084tif.9 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:27:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jlHkLotgiKAwRo088u/nKQ8X0+gdCmAM2XoztEIkXb0=; b=w+vRPdJqAvTxtekuoU8arMgWfdMlHhUvoB5z2Xt8es8VyKPb8PD3eJ5LjQqImk5ehg edo5rGimEEV+Q8lATHj/5KXwg5wNZ39SWZqw/+8q19DkKdt5UZee4XsBeSOHOswP/kEz lExoifApVWYjIWbveOPWIASAz7pfYucN3EYOc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=w4FBvgTquLNfSHSwyxvkRz6HRfZHBHsHxx2rOv0iB8LfmLUwcoPrYxO84/3ym3rOnA J4as2xf+vSWDQuHHZz1ZYCdEe63ui0IwWF7f7JnGyUbEWvu1+I/qxrVfHhaSEKse2CXc GwiCfcYpgfaxx59nRFEB8+BhoVN7V3wYVltFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.95.3 with SMTP id s3mr521514tib.55.1242106043277; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:27:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Starry SHI Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:27:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: hadoop getProtocolVersion and getBuildVersion error To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, all. Today I noticed that my hadoop cluster (r0.20.0+jdk1.6) threw some errors in RPC handling. Below is part of the content of namenode log file: 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error register getProtocolVersion java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVersion at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error register getProtocolVersion java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVersion at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error register getProtocolVersion java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVersion at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) 2009-05-12 10:27:08,276 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error register getBuildVersion java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getBuildVersion at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) I noticed that the similar error appears on the log in every datanode. Can anybody tell me how to fix this? I have patched this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5139, but the error still exist. I really don't know what to do and am expecting for your help! Best regards, Starry /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ From general-return-221-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 13 20:14:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3493 invoked from network); 13 May 2009 20:14:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2009 20:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 54374 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 20:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53773 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 20:14:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53723 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2009 20:14:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 20:14:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 20:13:56 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n4DKBvL4096766; Wed, 13 May 2009 13:11:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:references:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=nf2SEWW+e8PJVemOi1nsfftEJ6dve9VnoupwJ9LDtsp273PC/QODAu4mny/v8pfR Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 13 May 2009 13:11:57 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9D407.10A6DC71" Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:11:56 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Thread-Index: AcnNxepSpOFHRec4RX+Djty21JFqUgGP/ssQ References: From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2009 20:11:57.0496 (UTC) FILETIME=[112F9380:01C9D407] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9D407.10A6DC71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 20th at Yahoo! 700 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, Building E, Class room 10 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Please note that the location has changed from our usual meeting place in Santa Clara.=20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2659418/ =20 Agenda: - Hadoop Summit 2009 preview (registration open at http://hadoopsummit09.eventbrite.com/ ) - Hadoop with GPFS - Prasenjit Sarkar, IBM - SQoop - Cloudera Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9D407.10A6DC71-- From general-return-222-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 14 12:49:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16700 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 12:49:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 12:49:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 43923 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 12:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43483 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 12:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43271 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 12:49:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:49:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of starrysl@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.186] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:49:02 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so139271tif.9 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:48:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jVTM/PcqEf6uDghPhf0kOKLpTVo4TeZL7B9t3N3O1jY=; b=J51rCwvqgNo6tNYZZxpsCfxbUJW3Od5QDw3vmE7fdkW8EuxuSEYrcgdrI3AfbXnpY1 6Z9R3jH1F/GB6XkDTl81914S1IXjsX6mUPFMutwTbYmRO7m5+/GNWxEV3Pze8D5Sj4Mo iD07u55ymhfAIQ+u+g8J8zNPE7JrE3LzadGgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SHldTbTVH6kSiwKFf67gm2gBJBTn9U0LxFnYB19zb0RIY85ZGpb2oKHFkwXK8jON9g CZyh63fvqQFZr3p8Y7Xr1sMZgdMHoZpDBc8ylXAzzKtsrSz8Wefq88Zf46YicQYtbQNU 7Qgsnbrq7MisIx+HWRMY6RP+b7+5UZEWJtbac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.57.6 with SMTP id f6mr159243tia.25.1242305321054; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:48:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Starry SHI Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:48:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop getProtocolVersion and getBuildVersion error To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nobody has encountered with these problems: "Error register getProtocolVersion" and "Error register getBuildVersion"? Starry /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 13:27, Starry SHI wrote: > Hi, all. Today I noticed that my hadoop cluster (r0.20.0+jdk1.6) threw > some errors in RPC handling. Below is part of the content of namenode > log file: > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > register getProtocolVersion > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVers= ion > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegis= try.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.j= ava:523) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:959) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:955) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged= (Native Method) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.ja= va:396) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Se= rver.java:953) > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > register getProtocolVersion > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVers= ion > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegis= try.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.j= ava:523) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:959) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:955) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged= (Native Method) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.ja= va:396) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Se= rver.java:953) > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > register getProtocolVersion > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getProtocolVers= ion > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegis= try.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.j= ava:523) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:959) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:955) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged= (Native Method) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.ja= va:396) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Se= rver.java:953) > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,276 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > register getBuildVersion > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getBuildVersion > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegis= try.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeV= aryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.j= ava:523) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:959) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(= Server.java:955) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged= (Native Method) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.ja= va:396) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Se= rver.java:953) > > I noticed that the similar error appears on the log in every datanode. > Can anybody tell me how to fix this? > > I have patched this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5139, but the error still > exist. I really don't know what to do and am expecting for your help! > > Best regards, > Starry > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > From general-return-223-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 14 12:55:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18574 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 12:55:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 12:55:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 60149 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 12:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60051 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 12:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60025 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 12:55:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.167 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.167] (HELO mail-gx0-f167.google.com) (209.85.217.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:55:14 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so2414072gxk.5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:54:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iJGysT0sohqUPGKg+Tr9vE+/0G1aaIYTpj3S+r46EI0=; b=W6ilKmQXJsMPYCtXJEZU1qLGf2FCrsiditOcghUVooIaKIVhER5NtqrK8s9KakyFsh zKjvbM5Mf9bWptxPjg5mUEunjiMZXOO1kR1l+R2Ung1TOYPn5j18DGU7W5WzA0+m+8Vy MHGugam2xKa9iLYqy4kexUrFD+ciV5CQoQpe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iECLtT+lSHmVz6CawrWnS9gs+5wL54JskBkpr+UuCSygVU4BkGH935ll00yu0RnKLg ChAgvwCWkyVL/7XoebQ8RlYVDHW8ZsfkLyz1pAZ9Lwn+8efd0WD5cOTJdgOXwy5fVM8H OO7i5+ybaKuG1XQ1SdZTCOaWXSBdfnFtfY5Xg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.135.4 with SMTP id m4mr3564395ybn.55.1242305692231; Thu, 14 May 2009 05:54:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:54:52 -0500 Message-ID: <3c682ecd0905140554q1b8c5897j703d31a3725198e7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop getProtocolVersion and getBuildVersion error From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f0f047cea7e0469ded5cb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f0f047cea7e0469ded5cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Starry, I noticed the same problem when I copied hadoop-metrics.properties from my old hadoop-0.19 conf along with the other files. Make sure you are using the right version of the conf files. Hope that helps. -Abhishek. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Starry SHI wrote: > Nobody has encountered with these problems: "Error > register getProtocolVersion" and "Error > register getBuildVersion"? > > Starry > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 13:27, Starry SHI wrote: > > Hi, all. Today I noticed that my hadoop cluster (r0.20.0+jdk1.6) threw > > some errors in RPC handling. Below is part of the content of namenode > > log file: > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > register getProtocolVersion > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > register getProtocolVersion > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > register getProtocolVersion > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,276 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > register getBuildVersion > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate metricsName:getBuildVersion > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > I noticed that the similar error appears on the log in every datanode. > > Can anybody tell me how to fix this? > > > > I have patched this: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5139, but the error still > > exist. I really don't know what to do and am expecting for your help! > > > > Best regards, > > Starry > > > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > --001e680f0f047cea7e0469ded5cb-- From general-return-224-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 14 14:39:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68971 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 14:39:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 14:39:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 73766 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 14:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73715 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 14:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73705 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 14:39:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.103] (HELO mail-px0-f103.google.com) (209.85.216.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:39:44 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so677325pxi.5 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ukq8KsscwiC25hoqk4aBhg8dcpTZQhuvTTYPBGtUN+c=; b=h8ubRQwdhIs3LbsGczY+zfqS9Q5XHjHt1iLwpRjEUcvsUp/NL5IucspsUSaKs6TLMz upNSePhoMEbaYHKdKxVBFEuf8k7J7k47Wl4xW9cDI/xQBsyyxXjdgIl2DIvtN2Cl0n7y alBIEQE7az6l1o0TBhT87Nwdc+g6M5jQoxsP0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KNYt/6dqjivIg+RTNeC/66AO2Iu5lMMg3G6cg04e54zf9iVCVAt6DtnuiL2nQNNEQU JxxiIgcqk42M2kaVVgMlp1OzLrMjKWSQXL+CnElUItNA8Ftrt+aBsFzTV+fieMDRahAD cCYV20js2Ma+4V2pr78t4lRmUrdZQwVaT96qQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr2215099wai.202.1242311964539; Thu, 14 May 2009 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd0905140554q1b8c5897j703d31a3725198e7@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c682ecd0905140554q1b8c5897j703d31a3725198e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:39:24 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690905140739y7004923fheb9cf53fd219b651@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop getProtocolVersion and getBuildVersion error From: jason hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649c0a658bd910469e04b03 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e649c0a658bd910469e04b03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Most likely someone has compiled in your production hadoop tree. The default is to include the build subdirectory in the classpath ahead of the jars, and the compile process changes the version number. I haven't looked at 0.20 but up through 0.19, src/saveVersion.sh handles this. On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > Hi Starry, > > I noticed the same problem when I copied hadoop-metrics.properties from my > old hadoop-0.19 conf along with the other files. Make sure you are using > the > right version of the conf files. > > Hope that helps. > > -Abhishek. > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Starry SHI wrote: > > > Nobody has encountered with these problems: "Error > > register getProtocolVersion" and "Error > > register getBuildVersion"? > > > > Starry > > > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 13:27, Starry SHI wrote: > > > Hi, all. Today I noticed that my hadoop cluster (r0.20.0+jdk1.6) threw > > > some errors in RPC handling. Below is part of the content of namenode > > > log file: > > > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,276 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > register getBuildVersion > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > metricsName:getBuildVersion > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > > > I noticed that the similar error appears on the log in every datanode. > > > Can anybody tell me how to fix this? > > > > > > I have patched this: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5139, but the error still > > > exist. I really don't know what to do and am expecting for your help! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Starry > > > > > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > > > > -- Alpha Chapters of my book on Hadoop are available http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430219422 www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --0016e649c0a658bd910469e04b03-- From general-return-225-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 14 17:00:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40354 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 17:00:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 17:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 51056 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:00:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50989 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:00:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50979 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 17:00:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:00:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of starrysl@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.186] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:00:14 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 28so151817tif.9 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K9jKMQrxQX+1eT/08ECAniit5AbZMOKWl4K4QFSR5ho=; b=MB2kC9nyEkfmu5HZ5e/1dYAL3RyYKCqugS8W4VKcEWMlBIDUV4O+CgnAw1ZqmJShAw y12LU3fC50XhMD/p4N9eFjvQobVn7cn8IApwb1DdWA2YRz263S6bwVq9SQtZR2ThltL8 Q+imtC5aDipzED6rIMt89w/AvQuLg9REDPO/Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MTdBhv3Tqsc6hf3W0xUrSLMHabPdc9sHC+VtYG3V5znQrzDLAl85PToUmhU6364GOJ u0cE9icPPDocn2IgK882PIa91rgnokhZDFXuHIKc1DR9bH7v6l43emgoh9cMD1LYLurp BpNV/tbq50ll6SVOXBVdwtiWeZZPJ95MKAlRA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.53.19 with SMTP id b19mr170693tia.34.1242320392361; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:59:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690905140739y7004923fheb9cf53fd219b651@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c682ecd0905140554q1b8c5897j703d31a3725198e7@mail.gmail.com> <314098690905140739y7004923fheb9cf53fd219b651@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:59:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop getProtocolVersion and getBuildVersion error From: Starry SHI To: general@hadoop.apache.org, jason.hadoop@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Jason. Your advice seems right, because there are several users in my hadoop cluster. It is possible for some user to re-compile some files in hadoop. Since I am new to hadoop, could you please tell me how to restore the version so as to get rid of the exceptions? Further, can you share with me how to avoid users to modify the hadoop base files? Eagering to hear your advice soon!!! Thank you again for your kind help! Best regards, Starry On 2009-05-14, jason hadoop wrote: > Most likely someone has compiled in your production hadoop tree. > The default is to include the build subdirectory in the classpath ahead of > the jars, and the compile process changes the version number. > > I haven't looked at 0.20 but up through 0.19, src/saveVersion.sh handles > this. > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > > > Hi Starry, > > > > I noticed the same problem when I copied hadoop-metrics.properties from my > > old hadoop-0.19 conf along with the other files. Make sure you are using > > the > > right version of the conf files. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > -Abhishek. > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Starry SHI wrote: > > > > > Nobody has encountered with these problems: "Error > > > register getProtocolVersion" and "Error > > > register getBuildVersion"? > > > > > > Starry > > > > > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 13:27, Starry SHI wrote: > > > > Hi, all. Today I noticed that my hadoop cluster (r0.20.0+jdk1.6) threw > > > > some errors in RPC handling. Below is part of the content of namenode > > > > log file: > > > > > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,200 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > > register getProtocolVersion > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > > metricsName:getProtocolVersion > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > 2009-05-12 10:27:08,276 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Error > > > > register getBuildVersion > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Duplicate > > metricsName:getBuildVersion > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsRegistry.add(MetricsRegistry.java:56) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:89) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.metrics.util.MetricsTimeVaryingRate.(MetricsTimeVaryingRate.java:99) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:523) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > > > > > I noticed that the similar error appears on the log in every datanode. > > > > Can anybody tell me how to fix this? > > > > > > > > I have patched this: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5139, but the error still > > > > exist. I really don't know what to do and am expecting for your help! > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Starry > > > > > > > > /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Alpha Chapters of my book on Hadoop are available > http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430219422 > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > -- Starry /* Tomorrow is another day. So is today. */ From general-return-226-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 17 08:46:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64138 invoked from network); 17 May 2009 08:46:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2009 08:46:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 71752 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2009 08:46:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71691 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2009 08:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71681 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2009 08:46:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 May 2009 08:46:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [86.36.128.10] (HELO idc-smtp2-meeza.meeza.com.qa) (86.36.128.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 May 2009 08:45:52 +0000 X-AuditID: 5624800a-0000131c00000580-7a-4a0fcea95ead From: Scott Mackenzie To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:35:57 +0300 Subject: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop Thread-Topic: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop Thread-Index: AcnWy8g6Ezdlwg7GSC2WSUzUUie4jA== Message-ID: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873IDCEXMB1MEEZA_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873IDCEXMB1MEEZA_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application logging= for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process run ev= ery 5 to 10 minutes. Any ideas would be appreciated? Warm Regards, Scott ________________________________ Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential and it = may contain information protected by intellectual Property Laws or otherwis= e legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s)= . If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediate= ly and delete this email and any attachments from your system and destroy a= ny printout thereof. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this email and i= ts attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. MEEZA QSTP-LLC (= MEEZA) does not certify that this email or any attachments are free of viru= ses or defects and recommends that you undertake your own virus checking pr= ocedures before opening this e-mail or any attachments. MEEZA does not acce= pt any liability for any loss or damage resulting from the use of this e-ma= il or any attachments. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments do n= ot necessarily represent the views or polices of MEEZA. As the integrity of= e-mails across the internet cannot be guaranteed, MEEZA does not accept an= y liability for any e-mails and attachments which may violate the relevant = applicable laws. --_000_288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873IDCEXMB1MEEZA_-- From general-return-227-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 18 02:34:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70324 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 02:34:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 02:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27360 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 02:34:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27267 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 02:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27257 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 02:34:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:34:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of leitao.guo@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.178] (HELO mail-qy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.221.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 02:34:33 +0000 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so7633772qyk.5 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 19:34:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8xyZWMsWXdzw/jQ614D4nNAFrsqB/wDXq1nBZBTWPm4=; b=XoW7XRuEjjjz2TDywLqUV/xNtod6tn4YlzqudUDqKyq6TeKHB9aks4OnydTUYnZmx/ jHL/QboCY7xJqRPyAbR5I08sONoDh22CVF2/ucvVXGIy1z17zPJaK/MIr0XWEFWFE+8b Q/CUpoq32vw3A32JqvWNgqtqsEDjNyAm60zTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KgrXaMHFs0yg5aF981mRkeFk5M8coTFFrz6NEH3qMQcOFjRPbCmHFyNtvyjF3EgJY/ 7fZ+K6s5zk+PB7K3lCHfwuv6lsbqJRGW/n/U5sttvqMXjFYkrfioraNHfElU3i0ymgsz aULY/TZ71FSjav2KNk1VKlPC/vQKeK3Idln3M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.95.194 with SMTP id e2mr6166774vcn.60.1242614052658; Sun, 17 May 2009 19:34:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> References: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:34:11 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop From: Guo Leitao To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646477e33b2b3046a26a15d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646477e33b2b3046a26a15d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit have you ever tried X-trace? http://research.yahoo.com/files/andy_konwinski_x-tracing_hadoop.pdf 2009/5/17 Scott Mackenzie > All, > > Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application logging > for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? > > We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process run > every 5 to 10 minutes. > > Any ideas would be appreciated? > > > > Warm Regards, > > > Scott > > ________________________________ > Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential and it > may contain information protected by intellectual Property Laws or otherwise > legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and delete this email and any attachments from your system and destroy any > printout thereof. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this email and its > attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. MEEZA QSTP-LLC > (MEEZA) does not certify that this email or any attachments are free of > viruses or defects and recommends that you undertake your own virus checking > procedures before opening this e-mail or any attachments. MEEZA does not > accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from the use of this > e-mail or any attachments. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments > do not necessarily represent the views or polices of MEEZA. As the integrity > of e-mails across the internet cannot be guaranteed, MEEZA does not accept > any liability for any e-mails and attachments which may violate the relevant > applicable laws. > > --0016e646477e33b2b3046a26a15d-- From general-return-228-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 18 07:22:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53773 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 07:22:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 07:22:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 36888 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36811 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36796 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 07:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.51.199.98] (HELO mail10.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:22:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 27270 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 07:21:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.100]) (68.183.71.37) by mail10.dslextreme.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:21:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4A110CB1.6000300@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:22:25 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop References: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> In-Reply-To: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MagicMail-UUID: 91943b18-437c-11de-9e8c-00188bf6df8c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scribe from Facebook: http://developers.facebook.com/scribe/ -- amr > All, > > Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application log= ging for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? > > We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process ru= n every 5 to 10 minutes. > > Any ideas would be appreciated? > > > > Warm Regards, > > > Scott > > ________________________________ > Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential and= it may contain information protected by intellectual Property Laws or ot= herwise legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addr= essee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender= immediately and delete this email and any attachments from your system a= nd destroy any printout thereof. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of th= is email and its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. = MEEZA QSTP-LLC (MEEZA) does not certify that this email or any attachment= s are free of viruses or defects and recommends that you undertake your o= wn virus checking procedures before opening this e-mail or any attachment= s. MEEZA does not accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting f= rom the use of this e-mail or any attachments. The contents of this e-mai= l and any attachments do not necessarily represent the views or polices o= f MEEZA. As the integrity of e-mails across the internet cannot be guaran= teed, MEEZA does not accept any liability for any e-mails and attachments= which may violate the relevant applicable laws. > > > =20 From general-return-229-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 18 07:40:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58073 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 07:40:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 07:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 56752 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56683 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56673 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 07:40:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:40:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn1-10-73-153-c10.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.153.10]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n4I7dTga036592 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=X5eEGIsBVRfYPIhgOlq3F0LdR9mN7iGLux/zv5MYznPRTNRu9oTWhR12h5jqsXo6 Message-Id: <44B831F7-F720-4B81-BF96-E7E02FBB3B6B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:39:29 -0700 References: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 17, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Scott Mackenzie wrote: > All, > > Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application > logging for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? > > We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process > run every 5 to 10 minutes. > > Any ideas would be appreciated? > > Not exactly 'real-time', but you might want to take a look at Chukwa (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/chukwa/ ). Unfortunately I can't seem to find documentation for it, I'll try and push the chukwa-devs. Arun > > Warm Regards, > > > Scott > > ________________________________ > Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential > and it may contain information protected by intellectual Property > Laws or otherwise legally privileged. It is intended solely for the > use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and any > attachments from your system and destroy any printout thereof. Any > unauthorized use or disclosure of this email and its attachments is > strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. MEEZA QSTP-LLC (MEEZA) does > not certify that this email or any attachments are free of viruses > or defects and recommends that you undertake your own virus checking > procedures before opening this e-mail or any attachments. MEEZA does > not accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from the > use of this e-mail or any attachments. The contents of this e-mail > and any attachments do not necessarily represent the views or > polices of MEEZA. As the integrity of e-mails across the internet > cannot be guaranteed, MEEZA does not accept any liability for any e- > mails and attachments which may violate the relevant applicable laws. > From general-return-230-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 18 07:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61761 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 07:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 07:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 70083 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:55:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69989 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 07:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69978 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 07:55:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:55:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 07:55:48 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1778611ywe.29 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nDoGUfq4dH0Ezt5WODYrZqk1sI0tmg+rYFiFgi9eOjQ=; b=SBVZjQEkaw2gsxSXcf6ClDfwapSiN8s8193dwkF9KY1FYqPb4fVNKy5QG4UUUCWVmo rND+3Nt7nMqDp04Hb5WXnOOSlUxqclZiUX27ILoU82YboPffSHc3yXpNk29YHe/QH+sn DTK7513KrFlJbZrNMEZ2fKvEYK45oIKHyN4lk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=as6fPrjMUpBgqsr1K8nEeLJT/EKWBIsv/yrMhpU5C3lIzAp2ZMxdTJ3MK68paMoiS5 T5DKmFJt6F53Y8B/XA5ZJpdOzIavvIWoRgPR5wjxwEN8g5MyrlzvtklcFmjXpf9aAO2U b4bkUUZUPlS4RO1MjDXNu9DO2mCY0N4UqFAiU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.98.17 with SMTP id a17mr11802583ybm.262.1242633327409; Mon, 18 May 2009 00:55:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A110CB1.6000300@cloudera.com> References: <288C701BB8D5334097F77987DD1397B70D6071A873@IDC-EXMB1-MEEZA.meeza.local> <4A110CB1.6000300@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:55:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70905180055x3f859a29lee171e5531133549@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517510b0e10fa22046a2b1e3e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517510b0e10fa22046a2b1e3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We have deployed a pilot for making scribe log directly into a hdfs 0.19 cluster. We will be pushing these changes to scribe to the open-source location this week. Also, there are a few changes to HDFS that were required to make this work smoothly, e.g. HADOOP-2757. These changes are being debated to figure out what will be pushed into hdfs trunk. Also, here are some of the configuration settings: ipc.client.idlethreshold 10000 Defines the threshold number of connections after which connections will be inspected for idleness. ipc.client.connection.maxidletime 10000 The maximum time in msec after which a client will bring down the connection to the server. ipc.client.connect.max.retries 2 Indicates the number of retries a client will make to establish a server connection. ipc.server.listen.queue.size 128 Indicates the length of the listen queue for servers accepting client connections. ipc.server.tcpnodelay true Turn on/off Nagle's algorithm for the TCP socket connection on the server. Setting to true disables the algorithm and may decrease latency with a cost of more/smaller packets. ipc.client.tcpnodelay true Turn on/off Nagle's algorithm for the TCP socket connection on the client. Setting to true disables the algorithm and may decrease latency with a cost of more/smaller packets. ipc.ping.interval 5000 The Client sends a ping message to server every period. This is helpful to detect socket connections that were idle and have been terminated by a failed server. ipc.client.connect.maxwaittime 5000 The Client waits for this much time for a socket connect call to be establised with the server. dfs.datanode.socket.write.timeout 20000 The dfs Client waits for this much time for a socket write call to the datanode. dfs.leaserenewal.timeout 10000 The dfs writer waits for this much time after the last successful lease renewal before aborting the write to the file. On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Amr Awadallah wrote: > Scribe from Facebook: > > http://developers.facebook.com/scribe/ > > -- amr > >> All, >> >> Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application >> logging for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? >> >> We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process run >> every 5 to 10 minutes. >> >> Any ideas would be appreciated? >> >> >> >> Warm Regards, >> >> >> Scott >> >> ________________________________ >> Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential and it >> may contain information protected by intellectual Property Laws or otherwise >> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). >> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately >> and delete this email and any attachments from your system and destroy any >> printout thereof. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this email and its >> attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. MEEZA QSTP-LLC >> (MEEZA) does not certify that this email or any attachments are free of >> viruses or defects and recommends that you undertake your own virus checking >> procedures before opening this e-mail or any attachments. MEEZA does not >> accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from the use of this >> e-mail or any attachments. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments >> do not necessarily represent the views or polices of MEEZA. As the integrity >> of e-mails across the internet cannot be guaranteed, MEEZA does not accept >> any liability for any e-mails and attachments which may violate the relevant >> applicable laws. >> >> >> >> > > > --001517510b0e10fa22046a2b1e3e-- From general-return-231-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 18 17:47:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12335 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 17:47:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2009 17:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1948 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 17:47:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1877 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2009 17:47:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1867 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2009 17:47:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:47:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:46:49 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n4IHj5bu033746 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:45:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=rWhEdKXVxPOvwSpQQih9OIgZkn+ccYSfSEHVSU3dPWl0xtoD55zyiJHg/3MoCPI1 Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Mon, 18 May 2009 10:45:09 -0700 From: Jerome Boulon To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:45:08 -0700 Subject: Re: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop Thread-Topic: Question - Remote Logging to Hadoop Thread-Index: AcnXjCMKQ8FzibUeR7ye/O+W1NrMRwAVD9X3 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44B831F7-F720-4B81-BF96-E7E02FBB3B6B@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C636ECB41BDA2jboulonyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C636ECB41BDA2jboulonyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The documentation for chukwa has not been released yet but you can access i= t here: http://people.apache.org/~eyang/docs/r0.1.2/index.html /Jerome. On 5/18/09 12:39 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: On May 17, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Scott Mackenzie wrote: > All, > > Does anyone have a working method to capture system and application > logging for remote servers directly into HDFS in real-time? > > We have tested a few methods but all seem reliant on a batch process > run every 5 to 10 minutes. > > Any ideas would be appreciated? > > Not exactly 'real-time', but you might want to take a look at Chukwa (http:= //svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/chukwa/ ). Unfortunately I can't seem to find documentation for it, I'll try and push the chukwa-devs. Arun > > Warm Regards, > > > Scott > > ________________________________ > Disclaimer: This email and any attachments thereto are confidential > and it may contain information protected by intellectual Property > Laws or otherwise legally privileged. It is intended solely for the > use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and any > attachments from your system and destroy any printout thereof. Any > unauthorized use or disclosure of this email and its attachments is > strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. MEEZA QSTP-LLC (MEEZA) does > not certify that this email or any attachments are free of viruses > or defects and recommends that you undertake your own virus checking > procedures before opening this e-mail or any attachments. MEEZA does > not accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from the > use of this e-mail or any attachments. The contents of this e-mail > and any attachments do not necessarily represent the views or > polices of MEEZA. As the integrity of e-mails across the internet > cannot be guaranteed, MEEZA does not accept any liability for any e- > mails and attachments which may violate the relevant applicable laws. > --_000_C636ECB41BDA2jboulonyahooinccom_-- From general-return-232-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 19 05:43:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51534 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 05:42:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 05:42:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 60875 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 05:42:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60814 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 05:42:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60804 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 05:42:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 05:42:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.142] (HELO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 05:42:47 +0000 Received: from d23relay01.au.ibm.com (d23relay01.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.243]) by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4J5E8Fa002105 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 01:14:08 -0400 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay01.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n4J5gIYw454974 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:24 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n4J5gIfH014945 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:18 +1000 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4J5gHQb014935 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:18 +1000 To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: avro-dev-subscribe X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Jie Qiu Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:42:23 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 05/19/2009 13:42:24, Serialize complete at 05/19/2009 13:42:24 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001F576E482575BB_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 001F576E482575BB_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" FYI... ================================================== True insight comes from within! Qiu Jie Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery IBM China Research Lab. Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 FAX: 8610-58748330 Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com ================================================== --=_alternative 001F576E482575BB_=-- From general-return-233-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 19 21:49:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40933 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 21:49:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 21:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 88010 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 21:50:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87923 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 21:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87905 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 21:50:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:50:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.167 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.167] (HELO mail-gx0-f167.google.com) (209.85.217.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:49:59 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so146294gxk.5 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vJW97xEkGFm05cXH0ZPM+ckjd25dTyn38osoBCHbk1k=; b=QkF5yw8RD7gXuj9durVArPFv4ohqLCqB8JBg5Wf1n7TfTCD4hpwi4G6ivyHGRBbN4A Gkd/uAFYTWgN2Bvi45KZLKKoSIOOCVPlHdzsfjIZKx3YzZZalh3WZabOxZNMLU2UzArN 6hzrdaODtchRWF09WVBD31ebTxyD6r3GABDKk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JOErOMiPMLRO9FP1ICWf/FBC9XuvBDHOoMl7PBOWHCHCsaf0Qj/LelbQXEotjgr+0d Rxr3IQhru0D8msKVayU0+CdzEf2uMQhDh7rcBy+4qk6P7aWOsZrbw85BLPuekZwazvhG nakThuHnjLEfNwFppEmU+n9wAfdHGTpC8pELE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.74.12 with SMTP id b12mr69424ybl.68.1242769762077; Tue, 19 May 2009 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:49:22 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905191449x256cb2f1pb6d40caee9459934@mail.gmail.com> Subject: DFS Access Error From: George Pang To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f182834d96f046a4ae27e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f182834d96f046a4ae27e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Users, When I tried to access the DFS, an error message apears: Error: java.io.IOException: Unknown protocol to job tracker: org.apache.hadoop.dfs.ClientProtocol at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobTracker.getProtocolVersion(JobTracker.java:163) at sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorimpl.java:39) at sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(DelegatingMethodAccessorimpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:481) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server:java:890) Hadoop version: 0.18.3 I'd appreciate your opinion! George --001e680f182834d96f046a4ae27e-- From general-return-234-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 19 22:34:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6789 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 22:34:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 22:34:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 73681 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 22:35:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73589 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 22:35:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73569 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 22:35:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:35:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.30] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:34:57 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so55641yxm.29 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nNKtyHdHmnsmVgvHH1E0pcmUqC4StC5Emmezqo01CrQ=; b=MrD52LCwJqdIg9secwU9eltC1NpOwN1YOvcOmKNoBaq+wT/9aTVTUDxykucx7s6qU3 IaqAHTfDO3N/szmr4zvXeIhS8mACqgMv35N2bCCJ3C99cZnLIwr2O3RJIYWSh8AJjuTw j3OwoSyCEKwRXcq4Qhw822wOVUC1A1QXGwxaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mKFdNJarlUqMkmpHDsfOUFsj9ExLb898m3gA22TqSRUiZjtaURGib9TSQcTk+D4/Nd ljopbTQMYr9jWQku8Mvdq66Xc5+83/6Sk9rKmg7PN1bfCwyeQ0bz3sR/5muAA37MpRSJ CVEVUnwccI5eKAxBqfHGc4lz+kdaPcm/CILuA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.134.9 with SMTP id l9mr1152208ybn.240.1242772476757; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9c39bdeb0905191449x256cb2f1pb6d40caee9459934@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c39bdeb0905191449x256cb2f1pb6d40caee9459934@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:36 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905191534q5e9234a0hbe388121357b2f7c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: DFS Access Error From: George Pang To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f10e00384f2046a4b84b5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f10e00384f2046a4b84b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I made a mistake on misplacing the port no. for MR master with HDFS master. After correcting that, it works. George 2009/5/19 George Pang > Dear Users, > > When I tried to access the DFS, an error message apears: > > Error: java.io.IOException: Unknown protocol to job tracker: > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.ClientProtocol > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobTracker.getProtocolVersion(JobTracker.java:163) > at sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorimpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflec.NativeMethodAccessorimpl.invoke0(DelegatingMethodAccessorimpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:481) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server:java:890) > > Hadoop version: 0.18.3 > > I'd appreciate your opinion! > > George > --001e680f10e00384f2046a4b84b5-- From general-return-235-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 20 16:35:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92904 invoked from network); 20 May 2009 16:35:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2009 16:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 46915 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2009 16:35:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46319 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2009 16:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45925 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2009 16:35:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 16:35:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 16:34:58 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n4KGSFq5019208; Wed, 20 May 2009 09:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:references:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=ZuQTc0R8qLfHxu/uMJRKzU/0Wzz/1Jn/XE2XTyQIsUrzDDMzA3L8GgO9QeLWmv1+ Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 20 May 2009 09:28:15 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9D967.F9169E3D" Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:28:13 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Thread-Index: AcnNxepSpOFHRec4RX+Djty21JFqUgGP/ssQAVhVC7A= References: From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2009 16:28:15.0303 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9D3B570:01C9D967] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9D967.F9169E3D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reminder: the Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is today at 6 pm at the Yahoo! Sunnyvale campus - http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2659418/ =20 ________________________________ From: Ajay Anand=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:12 PM To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'pig-user@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th =20 The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 20th at Yahoo! 700 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, Building E, Class room 10 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Please note that the location has changed from our usual meeting place in Santa Clara.=20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2659418/ =20 Agenda: - Hadoop Summit 2009 preview (registration open at http://hadoopsummit09.eventbrite.com/ ) - Hadoop with GPFS - Prasenjit Sarkar, IBM - SQoop - Cloudera Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9D967.F9169E3D-- From general-return-236-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 21 06:25:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58174 invoked from network); 21 May 2009 06:25:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 May 2009 06:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 99454 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2009 06:26:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98904 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2009 06:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98729 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2009 06:26:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 May 2009 06:26:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.30] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 May 2009 06:25:53 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so531979yxm.29 for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 23:25:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UkKMITEsylGfYU7OQ0jFzVwp3fpxzXdXzYNXwYMQGSA=; b=B+t/WxGctmpiBbGMfgDoTG8EXNmV93UXqrUDc7vlkQuVV063DrNu74k/arTZi/jg94 cj04OVcKlz9t/ut6po9fsZ7KvViCZxqB6XWdpFt0zSrMe9BghLqoxCWqxLGQ21OKV8QD OYZcov8tqkIiHFeUd6Eww3ZNLH82LzLKPNYGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SEKV3esOwLVEY/jL0bjvvBBCn0c8vXKxGYr//Bjm6Q4tncO021vSiITl/GFb3h0AtO tpmOdf1TBj7W1SiJ1yW1wyo1Msohf2Q7wD6M19w5SIivWd6pN1MtkD9E6A5kxjJwhlQ8 0+mGFvukVqCjOOFFs8Wg7/Tx/4hn/cEy70AP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.202.11 with SMTP id z11mr4492571ybf.129.1242887132799; Wed, 20 May 2009 23:25:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9c39bdeb0905202312u70dae466m108f2e063cb11ac8@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c39bdeb0905202312u70dae466m108f2e063cb11ac8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:25:32 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0905202325x5758d9aew11a9304ee6505761@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Error message for PigPen From: George Pang To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4d35c0be4d2046a6636ca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd4d35c0be4d2046a6636ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear users, When I try to use pig editor on Eclipse (with PigPen plugin), one error message appears on the console: "*org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem cannot be cast to org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem*" Does this have something to do with hadoop version? Thank you! George --000e0cd4d35c0be4d2046a6636ca-- From general-return-237-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 21 22:16:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56483 invoked from network); 21 May 2009 22:16:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 May 2009 22:16:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 2411 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2009 22:16:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2364 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2009 22:16:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63646 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2009 18:13:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saidtherobot@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.167 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uueuy8MPrXIdsO+fB5ZvDv8ou22+w0vTXoVWSXaG0+c=; b=r1Wg9COgbzf9jtzu4cB4/yHBHh2DgmpzdXDMGjYi8jKs73DkvUJvsdsHlX+VviQv4A mDu9+z4KGwmxFiJFtURbYu3mFcdPZYzk21PDLIdBfP0wEOMjKANHmJ+etJprHpG7M8YF 2wEVQDm/pZEsG0crZD6LCqYNLM0Bs3d3yJqOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=R8J9p4aagcS9h2d1mfqROE/V0JbXkeM5cuoIGmZqvf6dDRH2jVNbjtBqYQFkADDtRo 3xro3vW4wN/d+udOdElmWVtMzbAJZlMCp4y98a0EAvg1Gpkojdi8HuHQMuhThwLwc83d Id7fyzmKYPmGdzc9JgDBSOG1fW79oOECg3dic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saidtherobot@gmail.com Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:13:29 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5d95efc6a784d745 Message-ID: <2986c2f30905211113j28a657ffr96e2061334b10e85@mail.gmail.com> Subject: interface to HDFS From: Mike Anderson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f10acde5e02046a7019b4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f10acde5e02046a7019b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I'm working on a hadoop project where my data is comprised of many HTML files (websites). One aspect of the project involves traditional MapReduce analysis on the data set, but I would also like to use hadoop as a sort of "cache server," i.e, having the ability to retrieve the HTML for a website that I have already been to. My question is this: what is the best way to interact with HDFS to make simple existance queries and retrieve specific files for reading. Ideally I would like to do this at an application level, (most likely written in Ruby). So far I have explored the option of using one of the FUSE packages to mount it in the userspace, but, I ran into quite a bit of difficulty installing either of the two popular packages. My second option seems to be Hive, but I haven't been able to find any bindings for Ruby or Python, etc. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated! Cheers, Mike --001e680f10acde5e02046a7019b4-- From general-return-238-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 22 10:24:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2076 invoked from network); 22 May 2009 10:24:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 May 2009 10:24:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 83492 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2009 10:24:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83404 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2009 10:24:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83394 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2009 10:24:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 May 2009 10:24:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.198.236] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 May 2009 10:24:30 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so531661rvb.29 for ; Fri, 22 May 2009 03:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.162.19 with SMTP id p19mr1648883rvo.245.1242987849139; Fri, 22 May 2009 03:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm2009158rvb.4.2009.05.22.03.24.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 22 May 2009 03:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A167D42.5080209@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:24:02 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: interface to HDFS References: <2986c2f30905211113j28a657ffr96e2061334b10e85@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2986c2f30905211113j28a657ffr96e2061334b10e85@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mike, webdav should work for you, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-496 http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/Home/hdfs-over-webdav/webdav-server That said, note that HDFS is not optimized for handling lots of small files, it will store them fine, and diskspace will not be wasted, but the NameNode will not scale very well (the default block size is 64MB and HTML docs are way smaller than that). See this blog post for hints on how to work with many small files: http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/02/02/the-small-files-problem/ Cheers, -- amr Mike Anderson wrote: > Hello, I'm working on a hadoop project where my data is comprised of many > HTML files (websites). One aspect of the project involves traditional > MapReduce analysis on the data set, but I would also like to use hadoop as a > sort of "cache server," i.e, having the ability to retrieve the HTML for a > website that I have already been to. > > My question is this: what is the best way to interact with HDFS to make > simple existance queries and retrieve specific files for reading. Ideally I > would like to do this at an application level, (most likely written in > Ruby). So far I have explored the option of using one of the FUSE packages > to mount it in the userspace, but, I ran into quite a bit of difficulty > installing either of the two popular packages. My second option seems to be > Hive, but I haven't been able to find any bindings for Ruby or Python, etc. > > Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated! > > Cheers, > Mike > > From general-return-239-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 27 23:08:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78839 invoked from network); 27 May 2009 23:08:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 May 2009 23:08:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 71260 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2009 23:08:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70807 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2009 23:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70623 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2009 23:08:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:08:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.146.183] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 May 2009 23:08:00 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j32so878385waf.29 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.158.1 with SMTP id g1mr1025423wae.126.1243465659597; Wed, 27 May 2009 16:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:07:39 -0700 Message-ID: <69035570905271607u745eafd2lf1826ccafa6a3b18@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Annoucement: RFP Open - Hadoop Summit East - Oct 2, 2009 - NYC From: Christophe Bisciglia To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user , hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363ba868ee4c4d046aece87d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363ba868ee4c4d046aece87d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop Fans, Lately, we've been spending a lot of time on the East Coast, and one thing is clear: Hadoop is everywhere. Hadoop usage on the East Coast tends to be slightly different. There are still web companies with armies of tech gurus, but there are also many "regular" industries and enterprises using and exploring Hadoop. It's time to get together and learn a thing or two from one other. The Hadoop Summit East will take place on October 2nd, 2009 and focus on two areas of interest to enterprise users. We've opened requests for proposals at: http://hadoop-summit-east-rfp.eventbrite.com/ Development and Administration: * Core Hadoop: Areas for Development, Major Upcoming Contributions, Functional Deep Dives * Administration: Large Cluster Overviews, Performance Tips, Resource Management, High Availability * Developer: IDEs, QA Best Practices, Sharing Code / Data / Clusters, Higher Level Abstractions Hadoop Applications: * Lessons from the Web: What can traditional industries learn from companies with web scale data? * Industry Case Studies: Finance, Telecom / Utilities, Retail, Biotech, etc. * Integration with Existing Systems: Databases, BI Tools, Message Buses and other Infrastructure * New Ideas / Applications: Big Ideas for Hadoop * Hosted Solutions: Hadoop and the Cloud We'll close the RFP on July 31st and announce the schedule soon thereafter. More details including discounted / early registration and sponsorship info available at: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-summit-east Cheers, Christophe and the Cloudera Team -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera --0016363ba868ee4c4d046aece87d-- From general-return-1874-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 01 02:05:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98289 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2010 02:05:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 02:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 67100 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 02:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66964 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 02:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66956 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2010 02:05:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:05:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.75] (HELO na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:05:35 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.161.44]) by na3sys009aob105.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFTWVxDd40V/VKnDpOBWyNOFb6winrxb@postini.com; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:05:14 PDT Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so448633fxm.17 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:05:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.152.75 with SMTP id u11mr224391hbb.113.1280628310389; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.156.195 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:05:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sameer Joshi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ecf72c87b4c9048cb9836b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485ecf72c87b4c9048cb9836b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi again Sonal, Just checking, if I'm running a pseudo-cluster on one node, so the master and slaves are all localhost. What may the /etc/hosts look like in this case? Thanks, Sameer On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Sameer Joshi < sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > Hi Sonal, > Sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. The logs, unfortunately, did not > yield too much information. I'll try some more configurations with etc/hosts > edits, and see if I can't get it to behave. > Thanks so much again for your help. > Sameer > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Sonal Goyal wrote: > >> Hi Sameer, >> >> Do you see all processes up? Can you check the logs and see what is going >> wrong? I suspect you will need to make the entries in /etc/hosts anyways. >> Somewhere in hadoop code, the ip hostname mapping is done, I forget the >> exact location. >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Sonal >> www.meghsoft.com >> http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Joshi < >> sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Sonal, >> > Thank you for replying. >> > >> > I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the conf >> > files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all >> Hadoop >> > conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. >> > >> > I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it locally, >> but >> > still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as expected, >> it >> > could not connect to server. >> > >> > Any thoughts? >> > >> > Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Sameer >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Sameer, >> > > >> > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and >> > hostname >> > > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you will >> > get >> > > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry like: >> > > >> > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 >> > > >> > > Thanks and Regards, >> > > Sonal >> > > www.meghsoft.com >> > > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < >> > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat >> > > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed fine >> > and >> > > > starts fine, however I get an error (java.lang.NullPointerException >> at >> > > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop >> > > wordcount >> > > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. >> > > > >> > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and >> > server >> > > IP >> > > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf >> > > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh (former >> > > > followed by a server restart) >> > > > >> > > > Any thoughts? >> > > > Thank you. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The output is given below >> > > > >> > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets >> > tests/out7 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to >> > > process >> > > > : >> > > > 1 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: >> > > job_201007270544_0001 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED >> > > > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) >> > > > >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) >> > > > >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) >> > > > >> > > > at >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: >> > > > job_201007270544_0001 >> > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=934 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=2541 >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. >> > > > Senior computer scientist, >> > > > Serene Software. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. >> > Senior computer scientist, >> > Serene Software. >> > >> > > > > -- > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > Senior computer scientist, > Serene Software. > > -- Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. Senior computer scientist, Serene Software. --001485ecf72c87b4c9048cb9836b-- From general-return-1875-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 01 15:00:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96758 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2010 15:00:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 15:00:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1948 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 15:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1813 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 15:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1805 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2010 15:00:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:00:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sonalgoyal4@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:59:57 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so3016iwn.35 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c3iUYEWZ9GTbmDWd4aMIcUTpLRW5TWpisNJh7ILrlJE=; b=aGG8YVOsQbfLgYL+LUGdfvni9B7oTEB+PuamPQOZoQfHVTunytPSQuNj9ifDo4wIih 9nreYp88GMkvmRQCILJbeH66eFTc8TSlV+CeqbsaYoUPOgXfjHXJH7hcPJ5ZZTh+w5rU L3ua5RR9THOZgWwphUejgeWVa5qC94tlXWJcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bsQqEN1yqUfY64dxemqffAxBypm6Ey/cYNPfjmZ/Dxqvp/5M8pygmOhq6/h8I4LytW xUZnTsHWgxUBDKiMwkJ8t5srG3+JAZpVTGlh8yTW59OXpPUClGN5sPJnwbF0oW+EbAWq 71Rbk6kfpNezrNfJ4iFv9PKCuj4vlJ2I8KknQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.9 with SMTP id ca9mr5386415ibb.120.1280674776653; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.12.73 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:29:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sonal Goyal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee28a22a2e2048cc4552b --0016364ee28a22a2e2048cc4552b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 Change that to whatever your ips/hostnames are. Thanks and Regards, Sonal www.meghsoft.com http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Sameer Joshi < sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > Hi again Sonal, > Just checking, if I'm running a pseudo-cluster on one node, so the master > and slaves are all localhost. What may the /etc/hosts look like in this > case? > > Thanks, > Sameer > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Sameer Joshi < > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi Sonal, > > Sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. The logs, unfortunately, did > not > > yield too much information. I'll try some more configurations with > etc/hosts > > edits, and see if I can't get it to behave. > > Thanks so much again for your help. > > Sameer > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Sonal Goyal >wrote: > > > >> Hi Sameer, > >> > >> Do you see all processes up? Can you check the logs and see what is > going > >> wrong? I suspect you will need to make the entries in /etc/hosts > anyways. > >> Somewhere in hadoop code, the ip hostname mapping is done, I forget the > >> exact location. > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> Sonal > >> www.meghsoft.com > >> http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Joshi < > >> sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Sonal, > >> > Thank you for replying. > >> > > >> > I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the > conf > >> > files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all > >> Hadoop > >> > conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. > >> > > >> > I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it locally, > >> but > >> > still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as > expected, > >> it > >> > could not connect to server. > >> > > >> > Any thoughts? > >> > > >> > Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Sameer > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Sameer, > >> > > > >> > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and > >> > hostname > >> > > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you > will > >> > get > >> > > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry > like: > >> > > > >> > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > >> > > > >> > > Thanks and Regards, > >> > > Sonal > >> > > www.meghsoft.com > >> > > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < > >> > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red Hat > >> > > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed > fine > >> > and > >> > > > starts fine, however I get an error > (java.lang.NullPointerException > >> at > >> > > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop > >> > > wordcount > >> > > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > >> > > > > >> > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, and > >> > server > >> > > IP > >> > > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > >> > > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh > (former > >> > > > followed by a server restart) > >> > > > > >> > > > Any thoughts? > >> > > > Thank you. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > The output is given below > >> > > > > >> > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets > >> > tests/out7 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > >> > > process > >> > > > : > >> > > > 1 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > >> > > job_201007270544_0001 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > >> > > > > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > >> > > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > >> > > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > >> > > > > >> > > > at > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > >> > > > job_201007270544_0001 > >> > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output > records=934 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input > records=2541 > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > >> > > > Senior computer scientist, > >> > > > Serene Software. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > >> > Senior computer scientist, > >> > Serene Software. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > Senior computer scientist, > > Serene Software. > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > Senior computer scientist, > Serene Software. > --0016364ee28a22a2e2048cc4552b-- From general-return-1876-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 01 18:32:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72393 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2010 18:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 18:32:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 82722 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82607 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:32:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82599 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2010 18:32:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:32:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:32:25 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so3722830wwb.29 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.208 with SMTP id y58mr3998162wee.82.1280687523373; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.204 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:32:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fair Scheduler documentation? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e352e6223d048cc74cdc --0016e6d7e352e6223d048cc74cdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The fair scheduler docs are available at: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/fair_scheduler.html On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > > > > From: michael_segel@hotmail.com > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Fair Scheduler documentation? > > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:02:36 -0500 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Ok so we're setting up the fair scheduler on one of our clusters. > > > > The only documentation I could find is the wiki, and then one or two > power points... > > > > Is there any source that contains all of the possible options allowed in > the allocations.xml file? > > > > I came across something like somewhere the other day.. couldn't > find it. Not sure if its a valid > > option. > [SNIP] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-698 > (Found using Yahoo! as my search engine... ) > > Ok this explains why I can't implement maxMaps on my cloud where I'm > testing out the fair scheduler. > > Also is there a way to specify the pool to be used at the time the job is > launched? > > Thx > > -Mike > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with > Hotmail. > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4 > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0016e6d7e352e6223d048cc74cdc-- From general-return-1877-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 01 18:39:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72969 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2010 18:39:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 18:39:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 88506 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:39:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88440 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:39:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88432 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2010 18:39:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:39:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:39:40 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so3727147wwb.29 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.2.195 with SMTP id 45mr1853881wef.106.1280687958908; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.204 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:39:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Cluster Configuration From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7541dbe04b048cc766c8 --0016364c7541dbe04b048cc766c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Vaibhav: The configuration for Hadoop is such that the same configuration files can be distributed to all nodes. Normally, users configure Hadoop appropriate to their environment and then simply distribute the same configs to all nodes in the cluster. This is usually much easier than worrying about which config parameters apply to which daemons. That said, it is possible to have different configs for different machines, if necessary. There's currently no documentation that says which parameters are read by which daemons although it's (usually) possible to figure that out from the naming convention of the parameters. Parameters in core-site.xml apply to all daemons, hdfs-site to HDFS, and mapred-site.xml to the map reduce daemons. As for which parameters are used by which daemons, dfs.tasktracker.* is used by the task tracker, for instance. Some are harder to figure out just by their names. Again, I would recommend distributing the same configs everywhere to make things easier. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:44 AM, vaibhav negi wrote: > Hi, > > I am using hadoop versoion 0.20 . I am trying set up hadoop cluster. What > are the configurations for name node? What are the configurations for data > node? > > In documentation all configurations are given, but, it is not mentioned > what needs to be configured for which node. > > > Vaibhav Negi > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Hemanth Yamijala >wrote: > > > Vaibhav, > > > > > While setting hadoop cluster, does configuration files > > (conf/core-site.xml, > > > conf/mapred-site.xml,conf/hdfs-site.xml) in every node(name node and > data > > > nodes) needs to be configured in the same manner? > > > > This is a complicated question to answer :-). There are certain > > configuration variables that need to be defined to be the same between > > the master and the slaves and some that don't need to be. Pre Hadoop > > 0.21, there is no easy way other than documentation for the variables > > (hopefully) to determine if this is the case or not. I think in Hadoop > > 0.21 and since, we have tried to adopt a convention to include the > > daemon name to specify which variables are used by which daemons. And > > those that are cluster-wide, that need to be the same throughout all > > the nodes will have something like 'cluster' in the name. > > > > Your best bet in any case is possibly to sift through the > > documentation of the variables you are interested in. Or else to post > > a query here. > > > > > How does configuration of name node differs from configuration of data > > > nodes? > > > > Not sure about this one. > > > > Thanks > > hemanth > > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0016364c7541dbe04b048cc766c8-- From general-return-1878-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 01 18:41:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73167 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2010 18:41:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 18:41:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 90791 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90692 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2010 18:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90684 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2010 18:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:41:42 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so3728323wwb.29 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.167.205 with SMTP id i55mr1875024wel.17.1280688081840; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.204 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:41:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TaskTracker Error From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: pig user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649c80c2fabf9048cc76ee0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e649c80c2fabf9048cc76ee0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Syed: JDK u18 has significant known problems. You should definitely switch to either 1.6.0_16 (tried and true) or _20. These are most commonly the patch levels we see in production settings. Try that and see if the problem persists. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Syed Wasti wrote: > > Found this almost a year old discussion, on the same error code and it > looks like a JVM crash. > The discussion confirms the crash on JDK 14 and I am using JDK version 18. > > > > http://markmail.org/message/74yv7zyuq7ucm2z6 > > > From: mdwasti@hotmail.com > To: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: TaskTracker Error > Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:45:38 -0700 > > > > > > > > > Hi, > I am seeing the below two errors consistently while running my script. This > does not stop my script, but throws an error on datanode and successfully > completes the same task on a different datanode. The task could fail on any > datanode, there are no blacklisted datanodes. > Any thoughts on why this is and how can this be resolved ? > > This is the whole stack; > java.lang.Throwable: Child Error > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:472) > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of > 134. > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:459) > > Second Error: This is all it gives. > Error: null > > Third Error: > Error: (class: org/apache/pig/builtin/PigStorage, method: setLocation > signature: (Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/Job;)V) > > > Thanks for the support. > Regards > Syed Wasti > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0016e649c80c2fabf9048cc76ee0-- From general-return-1879-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 02 16:03:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11103 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 16:03:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 16:03:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 79647 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 16:03:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79538 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 16:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79530 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 16:03:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:03:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdixon@omniti.com designates 8.8.38.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [8.8.38.6] (HELO edge.omniti.com) (8.8.38.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:03:08 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=omniti.com; s=s1024; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@omniti.com; t=1280764967; h=From:Subject:Date:To; bh=ZBUdPoTkYjXTQ+PfVQi4OWGgYV50VdOXaTT+oMwJw5E=; b=BdLwgziwJlr1cQRTdMg1ucQCWV1ocrdeHmijwPuqKAQcH0HhFzWhn+hNJjjjfKbp wB/rU9HQ9gdRQqtUOeA+Ff2aHW/kpdy/4REifys0LH/OdGz7q3hTuQBxFJk2D/lZ K15RuRHjcMrEOPodNCDKVpNylfU4wSiU4KBV7FKK/Xg=; Authentication-Results: edge smtp.user=jdixon@omniti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [68.55.0.29] ([68.55.0.29:65314] helo=omniti.com) by edge (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r(37468M)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 78/D9-03560-72CE65C4; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:02:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:02:44 -0400 From: Jason Dixon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Register now for Surge 2010 Message-ID: <20100802160244.GV4578@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Registration for Surge Scalability Conference 2010 is open for all attendees! We have an awesome lineup of leaders from across the various communities that support highly scalable architectures, as well as the companies that implement them. Here's a small sampling from our list of speakers: John Allspaw, Etsy Theo Schlossnagle, OmniTI Rasmus Lerdorf, creator of PHP Tom Cook, Facebook Benjamin Black, fast_ip Artur Bergman, Wikia Christopher Brown, Opscode Bryan Cantrill, Joyent Baron Schwartz, Percona Paul Querna, Cloudkick Surge 2010 focuses on real case studies from production environments; the lessons learned from failure and how to re-engineer your way to a successful, highly scalable Internet architecture. The conference takes place at the Tremont Grand Historic Venue on Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Register now to enjoy the Early Bird discount and guarantee your seat to this year's event! http://omniti.com/surge/2010/register Thanks, -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdixon@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 From general-return-1880-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 02 16:53:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30418 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 16:53:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 16:53:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 57011 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 16:53:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56896 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 16:53:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56888 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 16:53:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:53:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:53:44 +0000 Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so2708203pwj.35 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.192.2 with SMTP id p2mr5501178wff.222.1280768001600; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.79 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:52:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [84.108.229.170] From: Maxim Veksler Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 19:52:51 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e094c67aed048cda09aa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2e094c67aed048cda09aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the configuration for such cluster? http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp Thank you, Maxim. --000e0cd2e094c67aed048cda09aa-- From general-return-1881-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 02 17:35:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49709 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 17:35:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 17:35:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9683 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 17:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9164 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 17:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8940 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 17:35:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:35:14 +0000 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so10730553wwf.5 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:34:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OFKq3l82QnN1h//6vMGKzmJvSUXmQWKaYZnnsAGZPsE=; b=J4sFGZl7R3WbYFcIae2gRPiyLHHaY2We+qNW7aZsErJKNKaLgyEDJTcYmKkMw6iY4Y UReSqWUbsSny3tXSQntqApSgtJXNaTntkQ9LypCykDtPuotv6HHG3ydT3UCbkNvVa5Vm st661/ZlAQKjnL1QhoJ9/Zw14vUyJGd1lQiUM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vv6fsa0nWouJ36PtxCQE38Btq0OkUdZfq8EFoWfUgup+qZOLWO0SAHyoSjieVLgNIH 0QbPzPGfyzdIrP10WV5HoE2IbScLL/rJcRIdhzbvpwMHAkdTXp91krLdaDW+8ydY6c38 PlYgNQctOkw9PbWbJbEJEIFIE3BnU4/u57JS0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.69 with SMTP id q5mr2120687wbt.202.1280770486025; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.144.205 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:34:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6498450dbc039048cda9d02 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6498450dbc039048cda9d02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Maxim, Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here : http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf and all the records and their information here : http://sortbenchmark.org/ -Abhishek. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the configuration for > such cluster? > > http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp > > > Thank you, > Maxim. > --0016e6498450dbc039048cda9d02-- From general-return-1882-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 02 18:49:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86261 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 18:49:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 18:49:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 29745 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 18:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29655 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 18:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29647 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 18:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:49:24 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o72IlDQY036000 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:47:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=O5/6TZMGYrh3iHhatDD/w0Zo04Bc9qUpG+Vjl7oXU82fvmTWKIu/m+o5NOHy86h2 Message-Id: <17C47A26-3B02-4BEA-B862-7849391A6D74@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:47:12 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) The UCSD results are very impressive, especially given their hardware budget. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there were no Hadoop based entries this year - I know we at Yahoo! didn't enter. Couple of points: # The Indy category is a benchmark to sort fixed length records, not a _general_ sort benchmark i.e. Daytona. # Our _best_ result missed the deadline by a whisker last year, but we eventually did 100Tb sort in 95 mins and a 1000TB (1PB) in 975 mins (16.25 hrs) - which worked out to be just over 1.0 TB/min, which was nearly twice as fast as the record attributed to us. (http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/05/hadoop_sorts_a_petabyte_in_162.html ) Arun On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here : > http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf > and all the records and their information here : http://sortbenchmark.org/ > > -Abhishek. > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the >> configuration for >> such cluster? >> >> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp >> >> >> Thank you, >> Maxim. >> From general-return-1883-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 02 20:51:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30527 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 20:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 20:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 6570 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 20:51:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6474 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 20:51:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6363 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 20:51:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:51:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.179] (HELO mail-wy0-f179.google.com) (74.125.82.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:51:13 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so3567570wyb.38 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:50:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1/VwaGHdj1Fo/3uBF5GvbDxdctUZk8+oPFBUJPd9OFw=; b=tSiMFCwjnpu8GLka8BE5wWJ3amr34vzMaEY2kK5d8Rf0jT9R4DP6Jd7zUf8L+NIxS9 MAvizR6yTmoQCGTZFdqIcEZLDp6cQIz0/axBk4ra3sVC+brL6DZUnVOwO5aKT5kRx3/i eqyDEpUMo5XfyxMWzv2JEk4K+cTTQaae5cXUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T59p9EYwdElfi8WSXyARpsJ7IOuS5HfWhvnZC7JY0CBLnnd/1ViZ3oNO7rLGWJhNwP cw/Py+RjFRA7ED7T7rjT1uS835TYKTkEgwBi7F+sLAJJ+1//QpwOsZey9VJYzm3DucQ+ Py8Ol6n3iZ7O6AwQ3oMuLX8n6Hpzbzoeqk81k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.69 with SMTP id q5mr2314061wbt.202.1280782252977; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.144.205 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:50:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17C47A26-3B02-4BEA-B862-7849391A6D74@yahoo-inc.com> References: <17C47A26-3B02-4BEA-B862-7849391A6D74@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 13:50:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64984503931c5048cdd5bf8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64984503931c5048cdd5bf8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It shows how further behind Hadoop is in terms of performance. Are there people working on finding the bottlenecks and making it more efficient? Are there any JIRA issues related to this? -Abhishek. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > The UCSD results are very impressive, especially given their hardware > budget. > > I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there were no Hadoop based entries this > year - I know we at Yahoo! didn't enter. > > Couple of points: > # The Indy category is a benchmark to sort fixed length records, not a > _general_ sort benchmark i.e. Daytona. > # Our _best_ result missed the deadline by a whisker last year, but we > eventually did 100Tb sort in 95 mins and a 1000TB (1PB) in 975 mins (16.25 > hrs) - which worked out to be just over 1.0 TB/min, which was nearly twice > as fast as the record attributed to us. ( > http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/05/hadoop_sorts_a_petabyte_in_162.html > ) > > Arun > > > On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > > Hi Maxim, >> >> Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here : >> http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf >> and all the records and their information here : >> http://sortbenchmark.org/ >> >> -Abhishek. >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the configuration >>> for >>> such cluster? >>> >>> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Maxim. >>> >>> > --0016e64984503931c5048cdd5bf8-- From general-return-1884-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 03 00:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23870 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 00:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 00:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31201 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 00:46:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31131 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 00:46:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31123 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 00:46:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:46:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.205] (HELO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:46:18 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.161.54]) by na3sys009aob111.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFdmwcCDz1iSg3Lc7UOyTyNsCa5qOTCB@postini.com; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:45:57 PDT Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so1948960fxm.13 for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:45:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.172.67 with SMTP id z3mr315745hbe.92.1280796352873; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.156.195 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 17:45:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:45:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap From: Sameer Joshi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364187e3a4873f048ce0a357 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364187e3a4873f048ce0a357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Sonal, I tried it, and seemed to make some progress as it hung instead of giving the error. How do you refer to it in the hadoop conf files? For example, in mapred-site.xml I have it as mapred.job.tracker 173.1.86.194.reverse.gogrid.com:54311 Am I doing this correctly? Thanks and regards, Sameer On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Sonal Goyal wrote: > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > > Change that to whatever your ips/hostnames are. > > Thanks and Regards, > Sonal > www.meghsoft.com > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Sameer Joshi < > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi again Sonal, > > Just checking, if I'm running a pseudo-cluster on one node, so the master > > and slaves are all localhost. What may the /etc/hosts look like in this > > case? > > > > Thanks, > > Sameer > > > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Sameer Joshi < > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Sonal, > > > Sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. The logs, unfortunately, did > > not > > > yield too much information. I'll try some more configurations with > > etc/hosts > > > edits, and see if I can't get it to behave. > > > Thanks so much again for your help. > > > Sameer > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Sonal Goyal > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Sameer, > > >> > > >> Do you see all processes up? Can you check the logs and see what is > > going > > >> wrong? I suspect you will need to make the entries in /etc/hosts > > anyways. > > >> Somewhere in hadoop code, the ip hostname mapping is done, I forget > the > > >> exact location. > > >> > > >> Thanks and Regards, > > >> Sonal > > >> www.meghsoft.com > > >> http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sameer Joshi < > > >> sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Sonal, > > >> > Thank you for replying. > > >> > > > >> > I'm trying to run it as single node, so I had localhost in all the > > conf > > >> > files and in /etc/hosts. I tried replacing it with 127.0.0.1 in all > > >> Hadoop > > >> > conf files (read to do that on some forum), but with no change. > > >> > > > >> > I figured I didn't need hostname since I was trying to run it > locally, > > >> but > > >> > still tried replacing localhost with 173.1.86.194. However, as > > expected, > > >> it > > >> > could not connect to server. > > >> > > > >> > Any thoughts? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks for your help, I'm new at this and feel much obliged. > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Sameer > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Sonal Goyal < > sonalgoyal4@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Sameer, > > >> > > > > >> > > For GoGrid, you will have to configure /etc/hosts with the ip and > > >> > hostname > > >> > > for master and slaves. If you run hostname and nslookup -sil, you > > will > > >> > get > > >> > > the details for your machines. Make sure /etc/hosts has an entry > > like: > > >> > > > > >> > > 173.1.45.202 173.1.45.202.reverse.gogrid.com 28684_1_85017_358406 > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks and Regards, > > >> > > Sonal > > >> > > www.meghsoft.com > > >> > > http://in.linkedin.com/in/sonalgoyal > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Sameer Joshi < > > >> > > sameer.joshi@serenesoftware.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > I installed Java and Hadoop on a GoGrid cloud server using Red > Hat > > >> > > > Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga). Hadoop installed > > fine > > >> > and > > >> > > > starts fine, however I get an error > > (java.lang.NullPointerException > > >> at > > >> > > > java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap) while running the Hadoop > > >> > > wordcount > > >> > > > example. My guess was that this was a localhost or IPv6 issue. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > * I have tested replacing 'localhost' with both the local IP, > and > > >> > server > > >> > > IP > > >> > > > addresses (when out of options) in Hadoop conf > > >> > > > * I have disabled IPv6 both in sysctl.conf and hadoop-env.sh > > (former > > >> > > > followed by a server restart) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Any thoughts? > > >> > > > Thank you. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The output is given below > > >> > > > > > >> > > > # bin/hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount datasets > > >> > tests/out7 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths > to > > >> > > process > > >> > > > : > > >> > > > 1 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:44:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > > >> > > job_201007270544_0001 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:12 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:17 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:24 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_1, Status : FAILED > > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:30 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > >> > > > attempt_201007270544_0001_r_000000_2, Status : FAILED > > >> > > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > > >> > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(Unknown Source) > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > at > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > > >> > > > job_201007270544_0001 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 12 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=4 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Failed reduce tasks=1 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=15319 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: > FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=12847 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output > > records=934 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=149 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=934 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=25346 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input > > records=2541 > > >> > > > 10/07/27 05:45:39 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=2541 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > >> > > > Senior computer scientist, > > >> > > > Serene Software. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > >> > Senior computer scientist, > > >> > Serene Software. > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > > Senior computer scientist, > > > Serene Software. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. > > Senior computer scientist, > > Serene Software. > > > -- Dr. Sameer Joshi, Ph.D. Senior computer scientist, Serene Software. --0016364187e3a4873f048ce0a357-- From general-return-1885-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 03 07:35:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67136 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 07:35:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 07:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 46219 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:35:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45598 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:35:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45586 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 07:35:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:35:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.209.230.21] (HELO n4c.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (203.209.230.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:35:38 +0000 Received: from [203.209.230.74] by n4.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:35:12 -0000 Received: from [202.165.102.47] by t4.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:35:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:35:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 282670.94265.bm@omp101.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 75274 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Aug 2010 07:35:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1280820909; bh=xl535HCVrioMk8ix98bBvf3R/zYznJL/AdV6+ATa9S4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=re6wQuqRUY11C11Q5HwATzvdV+NFAbeeBbl0wqyc555hJUDnaF1I6QWdTBdXEGRxkZxJ0XrDCnQpvUyDQ83yiklQxpF4gek9OMeJPerBHyInOgRmdfF8LI0BfOK2nh1c+HXNCb+qqd+xXcTds8BmuCBKU2/axmRk0vz0Z6wZ/8g= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HwApAoR18SjXR8RshRK29zdY1/gBJBGMQXLPCvkWI8m/1IEgLre7VAM1H9/bh/9tlGRvkwzkN7YolJU9Akd0p6/njEVRZS5GhKdp90aZ16zjwLLITS/B2DYFXTgI/rO9z5UCG6brkdFx3NQ+Mjz63m9ZFxn8qizJcqswDlzMn3o=; Message-ID: <158791.69815.qm@web15201.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: kGkf5RwVM1njI38iJpt2H7HEn0QfFwaXhqTNCohNMWyf4zj eO8rqlzuU7Pf.v6x_6_PkPruGO5i2eMEDkyTjEV6YUAMdxr.za6o6ecJSi6b 46zawTKpYAFLmR_6Yhdfi6yHT815zRiCfczqgAToVEevOgBGmaWbQ3stqK24 WfSExibp70H1018hyqOcux5WJAPkx3yZeKTVUuTtvceyUvYW1.pIF90IN0MB zy4e.fj0uG5O1X9KOWmrLTdXDDuIFFe6LUtl2NH8pJI0r7vxm88qj3pMLoZ9 hNcqv0Iu.lwzwVMQ- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15201.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:35:08 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:35:08 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: strange host ip To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-532221473-1280820908=:69815" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-532221473-1280820908=:69815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, all, I am trying to install "Pseudo-Distributed" "hadoop 0.20.2" on my Ubuntu 9.= 10. When I tried to "bin/hadoop namenode -format", it told me "STARTUP_MSG:= =A0=A0 host =3D cloud/192.168.0.199", while my ip was 192.168.3.167, and I = even could not ping 192.168.0.199. The following is the CLI. And I could no= t finish the installation. Any idea? Thanks Dennis cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ bin/hadoop namenode -format 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 host =3D cloud/192.168.0.199 STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 args =3D [-format] STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common= /branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:= 34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dcloud,cloud,adm,dia= lout,cdrom,plugdev,lpadmin,admin,sambashare 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO common.Storage: Image file of size 95 saved in 0 sec= onds. 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO common.Storage: Storage directory /home/cloud/Hadoop= Install/tmp/dfs/name has been successfully formatted. 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at cloud/192.168.0.199 ************************************************************/ cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ ping 192.168.0.199 PING 192.168.0.199 (192.168.0.199) 56(84) bytes of data. >From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=3D7 Destination Host Unreachable >From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=3D8 Destination Host Unreachable ^C --- 192.168.0.199 ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 7038ms cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ =0A=0A=0A --0-532221473-1280820908=:69815-- From general-return-1886-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 03 07:39:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68700 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 07:39:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 07:39:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 50196 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:39:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49886 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49849 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 07:39:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:39:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:39:08 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2406125iwn.35 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.9 with SMTP id ca9mr8483233ibb.120.1280821127216; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.79 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [80.179.214.229] In-Reply-To: <158791.69815.qm@web15201.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> References: <158791.69815.qm@web15201.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> From: Maxim Veksler Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:38:17 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: strange host ip To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee28a4efd9a048ce668dd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ee28a4efd9a048ce668dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can it be that your /etc/hosts is mis-configured ? Please post this file to the list. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dennis wrote: > Hi, all, > > I am trying to install "Pseudo-Distributed" "hadoop 0.20.2" on my Ubuntu > 9.10. When I tried to "bin/hadoop namenode -format", it told me > "STARTUP_MSG: host = cloud/192.168.0.199", while my ip was > 192.168.3.167, and I even could not ping 192.168.0.199. The following is the > CLI. And I could not finish the installation. > Any idea? > Thanks > Dennis > > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ bin/hadoop namenode -format > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host = cloud/192.168.0.199 > STARTUP_MSG: args = [-format] > STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build = > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: > fsOwner=cloud,cloud,adm,dialout,cdrom,plugdev,lpadmin,admin,sambashare > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO common.Storage: Image file of size 95 saved in 0 > seconds. > 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO common.Storage: Storage directory > /home/cloud/HadoopInstall/tmp/dfs/name has been successfully formatted. > 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at cloud/192.168.0.199 > ************************************************************/ > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ ping 192.168.0.199 > PING 192.168.0.199 (192.168.0.199) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=8 Destination Host Unreachable > ^C > --- 192.168.0.199 ping statistics --- > 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 7038ms > > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ > > > > --0016364ee28a4efd9a048ce668dd-- From general-return-1887-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 03 07:48:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71362 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 07:48:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 07:48:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 56747 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:48:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56478 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 07:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56470 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 07:48:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.209.230.24] (HELO n4f.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (203.209.230.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:48:18 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.36] by n4.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:47:56 -0000 Received: from [203.209.230.75] by t1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:47:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp104.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Aug 2010 07:47:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 879276.60215.bm@omp104.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 79310 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Aug 2010 07:47:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1280821675; bh=k+G1whznnx+qnfKEsi2Hncr5nVJ4axfGn6Us5dphJ5E=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1OCxDhk/wYmIKLAQFM7r3JaYzru7qseT0ZU3tKWEVSUIgTupqOZD/UYNFv11Xqlv/tS1sWBv96zaGW+yrCh7LyMIw2LGFf4hSX4rRr/uZew7TvEwrUe3318deHYZoHd/ZiaMaTW7GO/9Y8vTfikPEXG8sL+Yu2ryDpeDiK6/lTI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D5kCDHq2oKFsKZag8aQ0bHDAyUVZQ073S8Mz2J/+7pRBI5CIHcL+1HLrq6dOlUc6GJv+WVjnBpei6799Jg3zWf0GKbytqDDrYswEbuXXgyOE97nysPSKhRoiRFHruhDehkTmtgOPZzXblxhIArIv0mdFqU7k5DWT9mIf+r4jUak=; Message-ID: <774853.79040.qm@web15203.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: NyK5Ee4VM1l1.zDgfmG4ZFode4Tn8p_CoGzG5PaaroMCxwG XSPJOnK0Ct8vB.sta4lSw4ONMs2X84qZ0a6fKQ8EH5H3voIg3_oGzBctBsKN E12M9djeIH63sOY4.iYDSu57UjS0FlmalBmunahktTj88gnoS8OweTR5Imxl aeXHv0l65s5wzw8zrqpu4_BkWjn5CIwHZKIF9jMetukPQ3V1dSElr8IhnMb7 gvg7jNEM4E8nFaHjy45uBGw6CRNfWc.q08OjhKxjG9sz9eTDEwTXnMCRxONU dca1TcRwRlyeX6Z4- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15203.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:47:55 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:47:55 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: Re: strange host ip To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-138240386-1280821675=:79040" --0-138240386-1280821675=:79040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Maxim, You right. My studio is being decorated, and I moved to another room. But I= forgot the /etc/hosts. Many thanks. Dennis --- On Tue, 8/3/10, Maxim Veksler wrote: From: Maxim Veksler Subject: Re: strange host ip To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010, 3:38 PM Can it be that your /etc/hosts is mis-configured ? Please post this file to the list. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dennis wrote: > Hi, all, > > I am trying to install "Pseudo-Distributed" "hadoop 0.20.2" on my Ubuntu > 9.10. When I tried to "bin/hadoop namenode -format", it told me > "STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0host =3D cloud/192.168.0.199", while my ip was > 192.168.3.167, and I even could not ping 192.168.0.199. The following is = the > CLI. And I could not finish the installation. > Any idea? > Thanks > Dennis > > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ bin/hadoop namenode -format > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0host =3D cloud/192.168.0.199 > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0args =3D [-format] > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: > fsOwner=3Dcloud,cloud,adm,dialout,cdrom,plugdev,lpadmin,admin,sambashare > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue > 10/08/03 15:23:03 INFO common.Storage: Image file of size 95 saved in 0 > seconds. > 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO common.Storage: Storage directory > /home/cloud/HadoopInstall/tmp/dfs/name has been successfully formatted. > 10/08/03 15:23:04 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at cloud/192.168.0.199 > ************************************************************/ > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ ping 192.168.0.199 > PING 192.168.0.199 (192.168.0.199) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=3D7 Destination Host Unreachable > From 192.168.3.254 icmp_seq=3D8 Destination Host Unreachable > ^C > --- 192.168.0.199 ping statistics --- > 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 7038= ms > > cloud@cloud:~/HadoopInstall/hadoop-0.20.2$ > > > > =0A=0A=0A --0-138240386-1280821675=:79040-- From general-return-1888-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 03 11:38:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62266 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2010 11:38:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2010 11:38:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 17305 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 11:38:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16780 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2010 11:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16763 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2010 11:38:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:38:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sarah.kho@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:38:41 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so787164wyb.35 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:38:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PhOy1ncJPbqyocmbXjwIj9tbSI/PrCKyye44/vsoB1g=; b=ttPhFVYL4gFGd9WZ79oeZgbCRqkHYeLPlLvw079bx1CttfKKRSPXwsbzEPCweUG4+0 DQwunIrNizxZXo/U1dYl6Qu3h8J33orcI1uJzUGjPpHg81loT6k5Sjp31zinSuyM/vFQ 3VgJ/vUUdhbbTKaYjZ/0ylt6TAa2l1T2EvWXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OdRXHUDtiR3jfMTiVa46KLeDx2mpXijYKeG9nVOAAr6HzGZpW2AOs6u4n7B5BQo87w qkBDiZuFgnGkEbth+bXS+uCZMYU0csZK43kTT2f9Zt98ywjRZRHM5RC0zIbBuagEeBmw so3UpXFA6GvBxBlUljVg4++Z4C5nsckgK1Lrc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.68 with SMTP id 46mr662301wea.2.1280835501409; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.61.75 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 04:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:08:21 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: How to deploy Hadoop daemons web applications? From: Sarah kho To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6c90413ccf4048ce9c10c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6c90413ccf4048ce9c10c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Is there nay reference about how we can deploy hadoop daemons web applications? Thanks. --001485f6c90413ccf4048ce9c10c-- From general-return-1889-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 04 03:03:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43949 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2010 03:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Aug 2010 03:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1798 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2010 03:03:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1464 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2010 03:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1456 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2010 03:03:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:03:05 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so3933750qwd.35 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FWpiHvRN5XaUj/rY+PiEn/fx07lD1WMGeDbRkqUsMMM=; b=xs4DeOobuEF4pj0mQLcimMrhtLr8qf8OyHOXNgzWnP0WIQ6XRJczt3gWdCiJ4OhBXh qoZG1VmIl6EpzJgiXwfAK/2Lut8wC8xsTjOszHL3Uo5l2JS8kDQ1I8va4RA/MMyik3WP x9soo1CBaKBLnixDe/FIWzSVHCW3wzwMqqGu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=a7ygaziIMwmDA7fOxQEFdRvx5kNIchx/wiLEa4lPzZWIf87zosdQhCrWIT87sFkLvI B5Esj6EeqCEAH5UBInDbTb75JjFsWUeVV9bpqseIr8IVUwaptEdhd7eA7GAcke6r0cRE d/iTNB/zHFewEHxILMQKdtkcQVUQCVruOM824= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.52.5 with SMTP id f5mr1709923qcg.254.1280890964552; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.77 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:02:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <17C47A26-3B02-4BEA-B862-7849391A6D74@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:02:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364edcccf02c61048cf6aa16 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364edcccf02c61048cf6aa16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Maybe this would give us a little more incentive to resolve HDFS-347 Cheers On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > It shows how further behind Hadoop is in terms of performance. Are there > people working on finding the bottlenecks and making it more efficient? Are > there any JIRA issues related to this? > > -Abhishek. > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > The UCSD results are very impressive, especially given their hardware > > budget. > > > > I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there were no Hadoop based entries > this > > year - I know we at Yahoo! didn't enter. > > > > Couple of points: > > # The Indy category is a benchmark to sort fixed length records, not a > > _general_ sort benchmark i.e. Daytona. > > # Our _best_ result missed the deadline by a whisker last year, but we > > eventually did 100Tb sort in 95 mins and a 1000TB (1PB) in 975 mins > (16.25 > > hrs) - which worked out to be just over 1.0 TB/min, which was nearly > twice > > as fast as the record attributed to us. ( > > > http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/05/hadoop_sorts_a_petabyte_in_162.html > > ) > > > > Arun > > > > > > On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > > > > Hi Maxim, > >> > >> Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here : > >> http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf > >> and all the records and their information here : > >> http://sortbenchmark.org/ > >> > >> -Abhishek. > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >>> > >>> Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the configuration > >>> for > >>> such cluster? > >>> > >>> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp > >>> > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Maxim. > >>> > >>> > > > --0016364edcccf02c61048cf6aa16-- From general-return-1890-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 03:58:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29710 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 03:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 03:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 73437 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 03:58:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72978 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 03:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72964 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 03:58:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:58:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xuwenhao2008@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:58:42 +0000 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so3587569yxm.35 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=jr4vyj5U2CgU7vpKKbPVOLbkFq9Er3pGQk/CDd62M08=; b=AobjiHksTFt6UoyiJRij2FbsZtb3HUcvOkeDr4toSGYlxZqSlleSsfaPunCo6f6ELv y/NVk/iAZ1BD98q8ck8IY7nEbGCK3tJQ+gyd7casd1TdtaG8LuaVMqAtvGTIukWQrO1L n0AB9MyQNsmWU0IqL1qx0jinBcG6+L5D8gHZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Mh4A6RLVzDnsszExKDnuNBxFhyI0xejYcs1RfwrgOE92PXEOnybXcbsgukt+KB1GUR rxlZ0d9xqQMrwbQMweKeXef+ubO8ULRmxYGPM/Hj0tfpC5L2qqViho62jTQxUQBqHxk+ HV+6bSErqn/17xNtgh4x3OlA+AWUu0GZpt/i8= Received: by 10.231.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr11406214ibd.92.1280980701592; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.158.137 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 20:58:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Wenhao Xu Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 20:58:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: is it possible to use other file system/database rather than HDFS To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325572daaaebe40048d0b8f1a --000325572daaaebe40048d0b8f1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Is it possible to configure Hadoop to use other file system or database rather than HDFS? Thanks! regards, W. -- ~_~ --000325572daaaebe40048d0b8f1a-- From general-return-1891-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 04:11:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37206 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 04:11:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 04:11:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 81277 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 04:11:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80992 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 04:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80984 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 04:11:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:11:22 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so3961304wwb.29 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:11:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=38rfquImyYQpE/UroIyuIULmg+N7n7JCIxQWgc82edo=; b=ids50vKXOyymsGwI+NVilSgPxO3g0/WJNM7hb5dcqimUvosm1Z48e3qiBcrUIFG6Ni mc33Sb9yytJLrpSucqrO7Npwdo2HgX0O4bzZdWE2jf+UTPl64SW5wF/eV+9DXDCOiFSK yGR+rrrX641i3iq47GycTRlH+51Zc5zJo1a6k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ya82u3G2WU6+97t8kgsBx5zzGKa9eue8dAHhJQwG6rFzuauNg9cbKLVIdl7FO7QiQy gngQ2izmzJ0gwRqOrsi2Jstf6NBYK0aYoz4irY8prBQDw3dxxOPUMNrb+XdeRtvt2GMT eG8TrPDEWgtuGgRS3XUc8U1aZniR5xvXLFuxA= Received: by 10.216.50.18 with SMTP id y18mr2893007web.113.1280981462211; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:11:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.197 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:10:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:40:42 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: is it possible to use other file system/database rather than HDFS To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Filesystems - Yes. You can use NFS/Local FSes for MR. Check this link for an example of a non-HDFS FS in use: http://old.nabble.com/Hadoop-over-Lustre--td19092864.html (Solution's down the thread) DataBases - No. Not directly AFAIK. However you can write custom sources (and perhaps sinks) for it for use within MR jobs. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Wenhao Xu wrote: > Hi all, > =A0 Is it possible to configure Hadoop to use other file system or databa= se > rather than HDFS? Thanks! > > regards, > W. > > -- > ~_~ > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-1892-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 12:57:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52252 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 12:57:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 12:57:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 17017 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 12:57:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16600 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 12:57:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16589 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 12:57:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:57:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:57:08 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so4419309wwb.29 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:56:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wp3oJ0GENUT0RCs4RA6EiQZxBxqFD7Wmcz6GrPGEr/0=; b=PQmDzkCn2zQsuoF40NUVjFapVtFdZcKB4RMBU7EYp6rlvBXddTr3Q4L9OE1G5WFAWU 0OBOL3IR30LYWQdulLI6UI8aGYXu97HnDOBt7VhexjF3IzVZJl8zGVEIom3tc097RkNP Ex6tXlkUX32/YyFpNFBj+MULETsxnUdNb8DhY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u7C3Ms207xMYdBFDuYrHLJuSzUsif/4fHxx2sXV6zsM5PSzLwzZ2EB4/4nXg2KdKli GsAizGpMY4OLcsmsfdnhRpxzsTwxvmA1bwnjcWt/DsLG+P53a/9ERRQMjUChofre6CyT JtOFmYkNHAE2X/Ly7LSKAY94X6avRSqS3QzV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.128.8 with SMTP id i8mr9279519wbs.91.1281012982566; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.76 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:56:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636833ed4c74fab048d131384 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636833ed4c74fab048d131384 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi guys, how u doing? I am learning how to use hadoop and I got this problem: I set up a cluster with 5 nodes( 4 datanode n 1 namenode) and I used the same configuration for jobtracker n tasktracker. when I run a pig's script I get many map's( like 15) but just 1 reduce!!!!! this kills all the parallel processing. For example. I have a file that has 1 GB and when I run the pig's script in a cluster It takes about 50 minutes to process. =( So I really appreciate if someone could help with any tip. Thanks for your time. --001636833ed4c74fab048d131384-- From general-return-1893-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 13:38:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66449 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 13:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 13:38:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 59437 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 13:38:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58794 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 13:38:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58777 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 13:38:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:38:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.72] (HELO mailout03.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:38:27 +0000 Received: from mailint03 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03 (Postfix) with ESMTP id D073D116278 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:38:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint03 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C52441165B8 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:38:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:38:06 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03C38611@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task Thread-Index: Acs0ncAfmIYGHN6vSLiTb8Z1HC4GMQABXMTA References: From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2010 13:38:06.0063 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F3ACFF0:01CB34A3] Use the PARALLEL clause of course! PARALLEL n Increase the parallelism of a job by specifying the number of reduce tasks, n. The default value for n is 1 (one reduce task). Note the following: * Parallel only affects the number of reduce tasks. Map parallelism is determined by the input file, one map for each HDFS block. * If you don't specify parallel, you still get the same map parallelism but only one reduce task. For more information, see the Pig Cookbook.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Marcos Pinto [mailto:marcoscba@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 14:56 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task Hi guys, how u doing? I am learning how to use hadoop and I got this problem: I set up a cluster with 5 nodes( 4 datanode n 1 namenode) and I used the same configuration for jobtracker n tasktracker. when I run a pig's script I get many map's( like 15) but just 1 reduce!!!!! this kills all the parallel processing. For example. I have a file that has 1 GB and when I run the pig's script in a cluster It takes about 50 minutes to process. =3D( So I really appreciate if someone could help with any tip. Thanks for your time. From general-return-1894-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 14:28:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91525 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 14:28:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 14:28:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 33941 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 14:28:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33643 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 14:28:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33635 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 14:28:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:28:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcoscba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:28:42 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so4544123wwb.29 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=waEOB3PEg5ThO2JKD/y7ve71ctXGvfRfrvDxDtAe3f4=; b=mOR/wZGV6gxwg8H2PzR5UtUSoMK1dFANYVtVIrpRsN8buy/2f8VCnT7fW4UIuVjEdi 9XltNf6fQyWnW840nZ9UE1h6IOeViqBDVcxD18Ub3iStWDyF9kiIw84XDf4VoS8DmFhd PgEiqDIGP7QQB4dcS8cNbyQdpLYOZn2jFVGZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vZZypVXZ0WBlny2SLCgbAxl9UMcxTJQIaLc50zKqBTYm4ah6yDWvqQCGFfpB3VgsX4 BGMfCGkpZQpx75/7CzMVNde2McPxQhnEthXCbzhVKukiDqWvOdiZ6eDXE3Sp9pFD8Eu9 ev8G0pwuP/GFO/G6Wch9x8TjoDS5RKQ6UL/J4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.83 with SMTP id 61mr3602309weg.110.1281018502324; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.76 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03C38611@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> References: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03C38611@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:28:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task From: Marcos Pinto To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1e74c82274048d145c02 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64c1e74c82274048d145c02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh Man!!! Thanks, your tip comes in handy, =). I had tried to set some properties but It hadnt worked out but now when I use PARALLEL clause it works very well. thanks dude. Have nice day. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group < Robert.Gibbon@vodafone.com> wrote: > > Use the PARALLEL clause of course! > > PARALLEL n > > Increase the parallelism of a job by specifying the number of reduce > tasks, n. The default value for n is 1 (one reduce task). Note the > following: > > * Parallel only affects the number of reduce tasks. Map parallelism > is determined by the input file, one map for each HDFS block. > * If you don't specify parallel, you still get the same map > parallelism but only one reduce task. > > For more information, see the Pig Cookbook. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcos Pinto [mailto:marcoscba@gmail.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 5. August 2010 14:56 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Problem: when I run a pig's script I got one reduce task > > Hi guys, how u doing? > > I am learning how to use hadoop and I got this problem: > I set up a cluster with 5 nodes( 4 datanode n 1 namenode) and I used the > same configuration for jobtracker n tasktracker. > when I run a pig's script I get many map's( like 15) but just 1 > reduce!!!!! > this kills all the parallel processing. For example. > I have a file that has 1 GB and when I run the pig's script in a cluster > It takes about 50 minutes to process. =( > > So I really appreciate if someone could help with any tip. Thanks for > your time. > --0016e64c1e74c82274048d145c02-- From general-return-1895-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 05 22:29:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13200 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 22:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 22:29:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 57588 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 22:29:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57528 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 22:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57520 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 22:29:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:29:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:29:11 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so5076154wyb.35 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.212 with SMTP id x62mr9947093web.55.1281047330268; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.20.206 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <17C47A26-3B02-4BEA-B862-7849391A6D74@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:28:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Data World Record Falls as Computer Scientists Break Terabyte Sort Barrier From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f5ce5c0fa773048d1b13e4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f5ce5c0fa773048d1b13e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You might recognize the name of the person who filed HDFS-347 from the press release about the new sorting world record... On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Maybe this would give us a little more incentive to resolve HDFS-347 > > Cheers > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Abhishek Verma >wrote: > > > It shows how further behind Hadoop is in terms of performance. Are there > > people working on finding the bottlenecks and making it more efficient? > Are > > there any JIRA issues related to this? > > > > -Abhishek. > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > > > > > The UCSD results are very impressive, especially given their hardware > > > budget. > > > > > > I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there were no Hadoop based entries > > this > > > year - I know we at Yahoo! didn't enter. > > > > > > Couple of points: > > > # The Indy category is a benchmark to sort fixed length records, not a > > > _general_ sort benchmark i.e. Daytona. > > > # Our _best_ result missed the deadline by a whisker last year, but we > > > eventually did 100Tb sort in 95 mins and a 1000TB (1PB) in 975 mins > > (16.25 > > > hrs) - which worked out to be just over 1.0 TB/min, which was nearly > > twice > > > as fast as the record attributed to us. ( > > > > > > http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/05/hadoop_sorts_a_petabyte_in_162.html > > > ) > > > > > > Arun > > > > > > > > > On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > > > > > > Hi Maxim, > > >> > > >> Hadoop was not involved. You can find more details here : > > >> http://sortbenchmark.org/tritonsort_2010_May_15.pdf > > >> and all the records and their information here : > > >> http://sortbenchmark.org/ > > >> > > >> -Abhishek. > > >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Maxim Veksler > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Anyone knows if Hadoop is involved? And if so what is the > configuration > > >>> for > > >>> such cluster? > > >>> > > >>> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/07-27DataWorld.asp > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Thank you, > > >>> Maxim. > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > --001485f5ce5c0fa773048d1b13e4-- From general-return-1896-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 06 10:43:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5512 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2010 10:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2010 10:43:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 96307 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 10:43:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95929 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 10:43:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95921 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 10:43:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:43:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:43:41 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so5710106wyb.35 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:43:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sWjL9FW2ya6ZgDobNWArfZlgmvn4vpzBVSX3DVQ3ePM=; b=U2ZmHKGK6O7KpGr/1xhuBzw+FzQkcwcvh5r06KL03foLzobUdqV2XIQoZvMTiX+/pc BIzkrf20acdUcdGVd9cB7aZNltFu78nmrGF1O+MuMXajy+CQWpl2vc/obiTh6ISaJuAv aIE0YxFNPye8T1DQT8nI6x+Y5jEEARkisNhg0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NjpORJLcsW2rDKRaK8MduGWuM319gywvThuPZURiODJu55pyYfXkmbTMheTI0mtmBA kyAjNkzcQ/+DTE0V8gLH0bCtM+APDf7G54CbAIZdlJehG0zR4o+ZPoByA9iR7/GnhDPI m68U3Q3yn1133foUyXrGsaisc/sW4yKt1RqW0= Received: by 10.227.156.129 with SMTP id x1mr10407737wbw.178.1281091400132; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:43:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.197 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:43:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:13:00 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem starting cdh3b2 jobtracker To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in /data1/mapred/local This line points at the solution actually. In earlier versions of CDH if the list of local mapred directories had false ones (like say the jobtracker machine not having 2 disks like all the tasktracking machines and it not being in the slaves list either), it used to ignore it. Now it doesn't seem to and instead tries to operate things upon it? Looks like a major bug Cloudera folks! Encountered this using CDH3 +320. Not using my jobtracker machine to perform tasks as well. It gets resolved after you validate the mapred local directory list on the job tracker machine's config alone. However, this would lead to issues with conf-syncing between nodes if it acts this way forever. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > We installed cdh3b2 0.20.2+320 and saw some strange error in jobtracker l= og: > > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTrac= ker > up at: 9001 > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTrac= ker > webserver: 50030 > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,988 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Error > starting tracker: java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in > /data1/mapred/local > =A0 =A0at > org.apache.hadoop.util.MRAsyncDiskService.(MRAsyncDiskService.java:= 85) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1688= ) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.jav= a:199) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.jav= a:191) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) > > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,990 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Schedul= er > configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, > limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,991 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > java.net.BindException: Problem binding to > sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1.ciq.com/10.201.8.204:9001: > Address already in use > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:198) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:261) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:1043) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.(RPC.java:492) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getServer(RPC.java:454) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1628= ) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.jav= a:199) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.jav= a:191) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) > Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > =A0 =A0at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method) > =A0 =A0at > sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:119) > =A0 =A0at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59= ) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:196) > =A0 =A0... 8 more > > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,992 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > But 9001 wasn't used: > [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25618]netstat -nta | grep 9001 > [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25619]netstat -nta | grep 9000 > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 0= .0.0.0:* > LISTEN > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.214:4223 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.212:49074 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.206:11910 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.210:62611 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.213:1299 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.205:9756 > ESTABLISHED > tcp =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A00 10.201.8.204:9000 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1= 0.201.8.207:59207 > ESTABLISHED > > Here is output from ifconfig: > bond0 =A0 =A0 Link encap:Ethernet =A0HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet addr:10.201.8.204 =A0Bcast:10.201.8.255 =A0Mask:2= 55.255.255.0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST =A0MTU:1500 =A0M= etric:1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 = frame:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 car= rier:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) =A0TX bytes:12000212= 3131 (111.7 > GiB) > > eth0 =A0 =A0 =A0Link encap:Ethernet =A0HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST =A0MTU:1500 =A0Me= tric:1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 = frame:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 car= rier:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) =A0TX bytes:12000212= 3131 (111.7 > GiB) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Interrupt:161 > > eth1 =A0 =A0 =A0Link encap:Ethernet =A0HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UP BROADCAST SLAVE MULTICAST =A0MTU:1500 =A0Metric:1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) =A0TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Interrupt:169 > > Has anyone encountered similar issue ? > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-1897-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 06 17:19:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98894 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2010 17:19:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2010 17:19:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 17027 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 17:19:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16971 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 17:19:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16963 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 17:19:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:19:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:19:42 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so7809176qyk.14 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.127.65 with SMTP id f1mr8538770vcs.94.1281115159310; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:19:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.201.197 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:18:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:18:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem starting cdh3b2 jobtracker To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e1ee15fcb304048d2add83 --001636e1ee15fcb304048d2add83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The IOException in MRAsyncDiskService is being logged with severity level WARN; I believe that system operation continues normally despite being unable to clean some of the directories. Are you experiencing problems where a partial mis-match of mapred.local.dir configuration and available disks caused a daemon to fail to start? If so, can you post the configuration and log? I'm inclined to believe that the fact that the above warning appears in Ted's log immediately before the fatal problem (trying to bind to a port already in use) is a red herring. It would be quite surprising to me if the disk cleanup service affected the socket binding component of the jobtracker. - Aaron On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Harsh J wrote: > java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in /data1/mapred/local > > This line points at the solution actually. In earlier versions of CDH > if the list of local mapred directories had false ones (like say the > jobtracker machine not having 2 disks like all the tasktracking > machines and it not being in the slaves list either), it used to > ignore it. Now it doesn't seem to and instead tries to operate things > upon it? Looks like a major bug Cloudera folks! Encountered this using > CDH3 +320. Not using my jobtracker machine to perform tasks as well. > > It gets resolved after you validate the mapred local directory list on > the job tracker machine's config alone. However, this would lead to > issues with conf-syncing between nodes if it acts this way forever. > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > We installed cdh3b2 0.20.2+320 and saw some strange error in jobtracker > log: > > > > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker > > up at: 9001 > > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker > > webserver: 50030 > > 2010-07-02 01:49:31,988 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Error > > starting tracker: java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in > > /data1/mapred/local > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.util.MRAsyncDiskService.(MRAsyncDiskService.java:85) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1688) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) > > > > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,990 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > Scheduler > > configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, > > limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) > > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,991 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > > java.net.BindException: Problem binding to > > sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1.ciq.com/10.201.8.204:9001< > http://sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1.carrieriq.com/10.201.8.204:9001>: > > Address already in use > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:198) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:261) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:1043) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.(RPC.java:492) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getServer(RPC.java:454) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1628) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) > > Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > > at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method) > > at > > sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:119) > > at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:196) > > ... 8 more > > > > 2010-07-02 01:49:32,992 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > > > But 9001 wasn't used: > > [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25618]netstat -nta | grep 9001 > > [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25619]netstat -nta | grep 9000 > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 0.0.0.0:* > > LISTEN > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.214:4223 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.212:49074 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.206:11910 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.210:62611 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.213:1299 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.205:9756 > > ESTABLISHED > > tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.207:59207 > > ESTABLISHED > > > > Here is output from ifconfig: > > bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > > inet addr:10.201.8.204 Bcast:10.201.8.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > > RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 (111.7 > > GiB) > > > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 (111.7 > > GiB) > > Interrupt:161 > > > > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 > > UP BROADCAST SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > > Interrupt:169 > > > > Has anyone encountered similar issue ? > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --001636e1ee15fcb304048d2add83-- From general-return-1898-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 06 17:48:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9737 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2010 17:48:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2010 17:48:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 40282 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 17:48:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40192 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 17:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40184 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 17:48:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:48:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:48:29 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-247-130.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-snve-247-130.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.149.130]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o76HlBHB091658 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Mu5kWpLWQxV8Tm9lly5k05rIGSEc9RzgWZdEjXG4TyWFLE35I5hJ+o1VR7GsfV4p Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: problem starting cdh3b2 jobtracker Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:47:11 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Please keep discussions of CDH confined to Cloudera's email lists. On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:43 AM, Harsh J wrote: > java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in /data1/mapred/local > > This line points at the solution actually. In earlier versions of CDH > if the list of local mapred directories had false ones (like say the > jobtracker machine not having 2 disks like all the tasktracking > machines and it not being in the slaves list either), it used to > ignore it. Now it doesn't seem to and instead tries to operate things > upon it? Looks like a major bug Cloudera folks! Encountered this using > CDH3 +320. Not using my jobtracker machine to perform tasks as well. > > It gets resolved after you validate the mapred local directory list on > the job tracker machine's config alone. However, this would lead to > issues with conf-syncing between nodes if it acts this way forever. > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ted Yu wrote: >> We installed cdh3b2 0.20.2+320 and saw some strange error in >> jobtracker log: >> >> 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> JobTracker >> up at: 9001 >> 2010-07-02 01:49:31,977 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> JobTracker >> webserver: 50030 >> 2010-07-02 01:49:31,988 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> Error >> starting tracker: java.io.IOException: Cannot create toBeDeleted in >> /data1/mapred/local >> at >> org >> .apache >> .hadoop.util.MRAsyncDiskService.(MRAsyncDiskService.java:85) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java: >> 1688) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) >> >> 2010-07-02 01:49:32,990 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> Scheduler >> configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, >> limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) >> 2010-07-02 01:49:32,991 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> java.net.BindException: Problem binding to >> sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1.ciq.com/10.201.8.204:9001> >: >> Address already in use >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:198) >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:261) >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:1043) >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.(RPC.java:492) >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getServer(RPC.java:454) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java: >> 1628) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:199) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:191) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3765) >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method) >> at >> sun >> .nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java: >> 119) >> at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java: >> 59) >> at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:196) >> ... 8 more >> >> 2010-07-02 01:49:32,992 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> SHUTDOWN_MSG: >> >> But 9001 wasn't used: >> [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25618]netstat -nta | grep 9001 >> [sjc1-hadoop0.sjc1:hadoop 25619]netstat -nta | grep 9000 >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 0.0.0.0:* >> LISTEN >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.214:4223 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.212:49074 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.206:11910 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.210:62611 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.213:1299 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.205:9756 >> ESTABLISHED >> tcp 0 0 10.201.8.204:9000 10.201.8.207:59207 >> ESTABLISHED >> >> Here is output from ifconfig: >> bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 >> inet addr:10.201.8.204 Bcast:10.201.8.255 Mask: >> 255.255.255.0 >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 >> frame:0 >> TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 >> (111.7 >> GiB) >> >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:351496605 errors:0 dropped:1015 overruns:0 >> frame:0 >> TX packets:178144953 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:119420730164 (111.2 GiB) TX bytes:120002123131 >> (111.7 >> GiB) >> Interrupt:161 >> >> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:60:53:94 >> UP BROADCAST SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) >> Interrupt:169 >> >> Has anyone encountered similar issue ? >> > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com From general-return-1899-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 06 21:03:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97665 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2010 21:03:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2010 21:03:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 91789 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 21:03:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91544 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 21:03:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91535 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 21:03:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:03:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:03:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 97428 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 21:02:43 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:02:43 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2129601iwn.35 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.149.207 with SMTP id u15mr14822845ibv.13.1281128562600; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.144.135 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:02:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop developers tend to specialize in either HDFS or MapReduce, but given that: 0) Granting karma to Common is routine for a committer in either space; there are no Common-only committers 1) The majority of committers have been grandfathered into committer roles in all three projects 2) Many patches to Common require corresponding commits to both HDFS and MapReduce 3) Review-then-commit is usually sufficient notice for interested parties to comment 4) There have been few problems with committers pushing in patches without consulting someone more directly involved 5) Everyone on the PMC gets commit rights to all subprojects, anyway Perhaps it would make sense to give up on separate committer roles until the projects are separate TLPs. On the other hand: 0) Nobody has been independently added to both HDFS and MapReduce since the projects were separated 1) It could exacerbate the focus on MapReduce in HDFS, at the expense of other projects (like HBase). 2) HDFS and MapReduce are mostly independent communities and codebases; expertise in one does not imply fluency in the other 3) Granting veto power across projects can lead to deadlock despite consensus within that community 4) TLP status for either project may require untangling HDFS/MR roles that could be distinguished now Personally, I'm in favor of combining the roles. I trust all six of the committers made since the project split no less than those made earlier. Further, version control is sufficient for recovering from most, foreseeable issues. I have some concerns about "harmless" commits pushed through without an audit by the subproject's maintainers (a few in recent memory caused downtime in Y! clusters), but combining the roles seems like a worthwhile experiment. Thoughts? -C From general-return-1900-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 06 21:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14405 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2010 21:48:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2010 21:48:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 30721 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 21:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30649 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2010 21:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30641 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 21:48:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:48:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 14341 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2010 21:47:47 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.147]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:47:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:47:46 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/06/2010 02:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Thoughts? To my thinking, a single set of committers should manage a product. A product is something that's released. Currently, we still branch and release Common, HDFS and MapReduce together, so I regard them as a single product and hence believe they should have a single set of committers. If/when we start to release them separately then we can consider splitting committer lists. Even then, we don't have to split them, since a single set of committers can manage multiple products. In fact, I don't see a strong case for splitting committer lists until these become separate TLPs. (The other Hadoop subprojects with separate committer lists ought to become TLPs, but that's a separate discussion.) Doug From general-return-1901-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 07 04:45:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48123 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2010 04:45:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Aug 2010 04:45:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 95850 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2010 04:45:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95399 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2010 04:45:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95383 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2010 04:45:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:45:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:45:40 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so6936291wyb.35 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:45:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v9KS8l08mrHHRigMH8l8ORR434DLQa06xwP0zB88DJk=; b=IPtyewzd8B6HK3NEbIOknMNzkXQQlg6Rs1XaAaMa0z9WUYJLWyDP2JLTdCDhy4sbpj lBka5hBB+iQ5ocMBuzRpPoHk/12icauWe5ilI2MF2dW5J+Qjp9rKh4SwIHS2iIkLP6lW dRdXyY7HCgbI77Xk6uPPeSm310232VLXtGGl8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=iGwz9+veTwYgIDYxkoVkvbjCNCiCzzsJai/05MxAHM6bLtNWyDmDmgLosiE52SgmW2 o3j0weUFy732dgddfjFfwbf5k3TcVemLCudYOxLppak0jjmsLPDHBIqf0XMhd2RAx7IM bcJiFD8LeRGsrIcuOv/brIYVx+AG/BLPgBWbw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.40.206 with SMTP id l14mr11381914wbe.139.1281156320400; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.168.149 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:45:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:45:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Yuu5U46U6VwC70Wgn9YKF5XjGUw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 on committers getting access to common+hdfs+mr. Thanks for putting up the comprehensive pros and cons Chris. It makes it so I don't have to think. The only CON that gives me pause is item 3). but my guess is that its unlikely and that if it should ever happen, as a community, we'd figure some way around (over/under) the roadblock. For those who might be strong on HDFS but not on MR (or vice-versa), I think its OK having 'privileges' though you may not exercise them. In being nominated for committer status, a nominee has probably passed the baseline common sense test that has it that they'll NOT be applying patches in areas they do not well-understand. St.Ack From general-return-1902-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 07 18:41:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59542 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2010 18:41:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Aug 2010 18:41:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17225 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2010 18:41:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17055 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2010 18:41:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17047 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2010 18:41:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:41:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:41:16 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so777385iwn.35 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:40:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MP6IwDVMW/U2GGWpTpv8OWEBcLMe39qwXGvii2G7iAA=; b=vJHoATisPIQsAD2DpnlZ0epV2YuuHfbaIQQw/u27G31y+MdhrbeLZ1mVZeSAJBgggT 5AEHtYepXGSfmfaVhF2kk/WEQHHYcDIxkFNjUWJARuaHll2b+lYI5BDJ2uIneLf7Um9x GldBC/OCez1cikMDtqDvvxePb+totZELJnfvo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AAAhBf8EfMwC0ad0f4gS54Urwbi2gjp2o78J3sptQZ2FYTNbfSNCe6x3+mjLKt5LQE cE/o5WhLXqn3j/czGqcZARo4nVSedgykSHNIVlZ9R16Z4dQXFrfj3qswVvo7lGz+yfxW XRIynYOSP51Zf3H+dUiDwUnctTPj6ZeMiXti8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.29.33 with SMTP id o33mr15862033ibc.164.1281206454897; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.15.73 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 13:40:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop node's locality From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015177408fca0cd36048d401f40 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015177408fca0cd36048d401f40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone, Does anybody know if Hadoop can take scheduling decisions using nodes positions within network topology ? Or if there is any work being done on this? Thanks in advanced. Renato M. --0015177408fca0cd36048d401f40-- From general-return-1903-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 08 19:22:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46578 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2010 19:22:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Aug 2010 19:22:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 20104 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 19:22:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20031 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 19:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20023 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2010 19:22:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:22:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:22:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c36.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.36]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o78JLZbC038414 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=fxoDCNNat2wvUzZXrqYtSm3ZqqH9kuKjAWfpQVXFmRuh9HiOfeV7ME3i3zEHqaUo Message-Id: <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:21:40 -0700 References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/06/2010 02:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> Thoughts? > > To my thinking, a single set of committers should manage a product. A > product is something that's released. Currently, we still branch and > release Common, HDFS and MapReduce together, so I regard them as a > single product and hence believe they should have a single set of > committers. This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? Arun From general-return-1904-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 08 19:51:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53895 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2010 19:51:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Aug 2010 19:51:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 37979 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 19:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37903 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2010 19:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37895 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2010 19:51:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:51:00 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o78Jo85O039419; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:50:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic: thread-index:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=N7W7hnSTvtMP4GV6zxccUeKImvw0JLIFZ9++jl3YftzTebLpFa+AIcYYY7B2PTnN Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.136]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:50:08 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:50:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Thread-Index: Acs3Mubv0sxKgAZHSDiKTUumhCQpLw== Message-ID: <196D22F3-42CE-416F-AB88-33E197FF22ED@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent from my iPhone On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:23 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > > On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> On 08/06/2010 02:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >>> Thoughts? >> >> To my thinking, a single set of committers should manage a =20 >> product. A >> product is something that's released. Currently, we still branch and >> release Common, HDFS and MapReduce together, so I regard them as a >> single product and hence believe they should have a single set of >> committers. > > This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, > HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? Good point Arun. I am in support of this. > > Arun From general-return-1905-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 04:43:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70374 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 04:43:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 04:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 10342 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 04:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9935 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 04:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9927 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 04:43:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:43:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:43:20 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so9887019qwd.35 for ; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qEz3uD89HU3ZsfjA3+v9DKRnci3VBuQxgwEhWosuoGQ=; b=XB4EoRpK23SxEz05tBgNNt4LqAQIODpD7SXbPYj4IyhMnOc53Xum5pOnGAyAYl1+r+ pqDIEwYj3olSS+Se8eeqmyo8SI+3lCa47oPwKqw7YKsM6G2vs/RFYjtdMjnUFy8qAoYB +Atd5NA0+TRhI49+2ZGDrsAa/6bunfXakgAZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Plm36bSHl5FThBmY0MJeUFKpFeAv3cm2z5XxyVee6kCu8gYUVRa/1hRHg/0cRcycT2 phoDWGyvYmwYOybVcSTFU2XCTNNl16SCvHXKmo98+fzlcAsEBga9CnjQ9ctF/dnVYzZF LumTXxcmUlOaZgt84rSbMvQMByoq1sx+IrV6U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.163.10 with SMTP id y10mr9326988vcx.63.1281328979595; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.138 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:42:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:12:59 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> On 08/06/2010 02:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> To my thinking, a single set of committers should manage a product. =A0A >> product is something that's released. =A0Currently, we still branch and >> release Common, HDFS and MapReduce together, so I regard them as a >> single product and hence believe they should have a single set of >> committers. > > This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, HDFS= & > Map-Reduce together and be done with? I actually think that would simplify matters *smile* Thanks hemanth From general-return-1906-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 11:08:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24243 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 11:08:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 11:08:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 57700 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 11:08:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57311 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 11:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57303 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 11:08:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:08:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:08:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223AEB7CBF for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:07:47 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Irv5n5uI08cG for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:07:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52422B7CB5 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:07:46 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1281956854.4814@DroRhlhXNmD66w708lK8Dw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o79B7WHc026182 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:07:32 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C5FE174.5030702@apache.org> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:07:32 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o79B7WHc026182 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/08/10 05:42, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >> >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> >>> On 08/06/2010 02:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> To my thinking, a single set of committers should manage a product. A >>> product is something that's released. Currently, we still branch and >>> release Common, HDFS and MapReduce together, so I regard them as a >>> single product and hence believe they should have a single set of >>> committers. >> >> This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, HDFS& >> Map-Reduce together and be done with? > > I actually think that would simplify matters *smile* I seem to recall the original goal of the split was to make it easier for people to stay current with the dev of their particular bit, but I'm not sure that goal has been met -more dev mailing lists, all of which I'm behind on -more user lists, messages get sent to more of them or its not clear where -its very hard to push out manageability changes across everything -no clear push for a desynchronised release process -testing of everything is very convoluted common, hdfs and mapreduce are very tightly coupled, in code and in releases. I don't see the split as having helped, it just seems to have slowed the rate of release, and that's been bad for everyone. -steve From general-return-1907-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 12:35:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66395 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 12:35:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 12:35:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 67526 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 12:35:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66950 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 12:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66942 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 12:35:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:35:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:35:08 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1647502wwb.29 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:34:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OOaMKhhet+EbwIJGmziaHCRSVl3VeExQWPjoa9f9By8=; b=WKLntCSGObKQhIkmRQAkj/BgLMb68JZMdt3XXeJhdf/Cp1UPFgIRiZKsljxpHmgs2j +gEOXiMa1V2Rt2fvd+RSM76TLBqZKWHRlMe6cnx8SSiq/VyNP8z+0RR5iQ7ex9Dr5MJV OV3nMhLMI5i+mqm1CnotxU9iFkyK0EpZJfjb4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=C2qnxTSeXQPuG27zHOWSdrbJLwTP2KGNm89WqOZvDiBO29clrnQ9Ea6Yi5P/+ZRYKd jkd1dLhJVZyNwMgJIEocdLmdFc2beEp2ZeKcwI05+7ZgV9Zm6ZecbPLW34ZKV5iMxWbV 3JkJa7+QljZz5Ppa64dWb+UBCZSCsDCn2dBdk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.202 with SMTP id y10mr13498877wbw.48.1281357284460; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.139.13 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:34:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:04:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop node's locality From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9a58c548ce048d633dc2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b9a58c548ce048d633dc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , I am also a nebie to hadoop. But i think u should read about "rack aware" concept. It may solve your query. Vaibhav Negi On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Does anybody know if Hadoop can take scheduling decisions using nodes > positions > within network topology ? Or if there is any work being done on this? > Thanks in advanced. > > > Renato M. > --0016363b9a58c548ce048d633dc2-- From general-return-1908-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 12:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68793 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 12:41:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 12:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 71383 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 12:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71084 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 12:41:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71076 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 12:41:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:41:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [210.210.41.205] (HELO mail1.mkhoj.com) (210.210.41.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:41:06 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FAAOQX0wKDmQH/2dsb2JhbACTUI1lwReFOgSEJIUXgk4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,341,1278268200"; d="scan'208";a="898080" Received: from mk-exch-1.mkhoj.com ([10.14.100.7]) by mail1.mkhoj.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2010 18:10:41 +0530 Received: from [10.14.100.125] (10.14.100.125) by MK-EXCH-1.MKHOJ.COM (10.14.100.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:07:40 +0530 Message-ID: <4C5FF6C0.5000906@inmobi.com> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:08:24 +0530 From: Rohan Rai User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Hadoop 0.21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/hadoop-0.21.0-candidate-0/ Do we have any more candidate release after this. Thanking You Regards Rohan The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the = use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authoriz= ed to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged informa= tion. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that an= y disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the= contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. I= f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediate= ly by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. The fir= m is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the informa= tion contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. From general-return-1909-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 14:32:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39688 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 14:32:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 14:32:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 44602 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 14:32:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44031 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 14:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44023 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 14:32:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:32:21 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2072776bwz.35 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.49.22 with SMTP id t22mr10767045bkf.188.1281364319394; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 07:31:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C5FF6C0.5000906@inmobi.com> References: <4C5FF6C0.5000906@inmobi.com> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 07:31:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.21 From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Rohan, MAPREDUCE-1920 is blocking the next candidate. I'm going to create a new candidate once this JIRA is resolved. Cheers, Tom On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Rohan Rai wrote: > Hi > > http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/hadoop-0.21.0-candidate-0/ > > Do we have any more candidate release after this. > > Thanking You > Regards > Rohan > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. > The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt. > From general-return-1910-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 16:21:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26905 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 16:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 16:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 25865 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25807 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25799 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 16:21:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:21:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:21:29 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2189025bwz.35 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:21:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.82 with SMTP id b18mr3190902bks.124.1281370865763; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:21:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 to having a single committer list for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce. The projects are currently closely aligned and there have been cases where a committer couldn't commit what was logically a single patch because it was split between Common and MapReduce. I think we should make this change regardless of whether we ultimately split the projects into TLPs, we merge them back into a single project, or we keep them as three subprojects within the Hadoop TLP (as they are now). I would also suggest that the question of what to do about the project split, although related, probably deserves a separate discussion. Tom On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Hadoop developers tend to specialize in either HDFS or MapReduce, but > given that: > > 0) Granting karma to Common is routine for a committer in either > space; there are no Common-only committers > 1) The majority of committers have been grandfathered into committer > roles in all three projects > 2) Many patches to Common require corresponding commits to both HDFS > and MapReduce > 3) Review-then-commit is usually sufficient notice for interested > parties to comment > 4) There have been few problems with committers pushing in patches > without consulting someone more directly involved > 5) Everyone on the PMC gets commit rights to all subprojects, anyway > > Perhaps it would make sense to give up on separate committer roles > until the projects are separate TLPs. > > On the other hand: > > 0) Nobody has been independently added to both HDFS and MapReduce > since the projects were separated > 1) It could exacerbate the focus on MapReduce in HDFS, at the expense > of other projects (like HBase). > 2) HDFS and MapReduce are mostly independent communities and > codebases; expertise in one does not imply fluency in the other > 3) Granting veto power across projects can lead to deadlock despite > consensus within that community > 4) TLP status for either project may require untangling HDFS/MR roles > that could be distinguished now > > Personally, I'm in favor of combining the roles. I trust all six of > the committers made since the project split no less than those made > earlier. Further, version control is sufficient for recovering from > most, foreseeable issues. I have some concerns about "harmless" > commits pushed through without an audit by the subproject's > maintainers (a few in recent memory caused downtime in Y! clusters), > but combining the roles seems like a worthwhile experiment. > > Thoughts? -C > From general-return-1911-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 16:24:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29039 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 16:24:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 16:24:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31562 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31504 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31496 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 16:24:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:24:27 +0000 Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id sBkl1e0041c6gX858GQ7es; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:24:07 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id sGPy1e0052SbwD53jGQ1gS; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:24:05 +0000 Message-Id: <86CD5A62-7982-44DD-A03C-D4D1B5546088@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:23:56 -0700 References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, > HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? *Sigh* I wish we'd just split the mailing lists, source code, and artifacts (jars, documentation) and left it in a single project. Basically, we should have set it up as: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/trunk/{common,hdfs,mapreduce} It would certainly make it easier to deal with cross-project patches. But, that said, I'm not wild about going through another cutoff where we lose all of our history in git. (Subversion tracks through the split but the svn to git gateway views them as new files.) I really wish we could just move to git for commits as well as for reads. I'm also concerned about spinning for the sake of spinning. Doing more major code movement will cause more instability in trunk that I'm not sure is a good idea without clear goals and roadmaps. -- Owen From general-return-1912-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 16:26:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31260 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 16:26:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 16:26:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 38746 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38609 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 16:26:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38601 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 16:26:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:26:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:26:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 29894 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 16:26:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.103]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:26:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:26:15 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/08/2010 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, > HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? I think there's still a reasonable long-term goal to split MapReduce from HDFS, so that they can release separately and are maintained by separate teams. So I believe a strong division of these code trees and release artifacts should remain. I'd like to get rid of Common. It could either be merged into HDFS or gradually whittled away to nothing. I'd prefer the latter. If we move to different RPC and serialization systems (e.g., Avro) then Common's io, and ipc packages might be removed. Configuration might be replaced/merged with Jakarta Commons Configuration (http://commons.apache.org/configuration/). Similarly, the metrics and fs packages might be moved to Jakarta Commons. Such changes might be hard to do back-compatibly, however. I don't see that merging the Jira databases or mailing lists for HDFS and MapReduce offers big advantages. The redundant, coordinated Jira's tend to be between Common the others, no? Doug From general-return-1913-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 20:53:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52216 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 20:53:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 20:53:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 23046 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 20:53:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22937 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 20:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22780 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 20:53:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:53:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:53:13 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so9709468wyb.35 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z0GabpTuhekfwdeINznjkd1QLcQjc086TqIS2+Vi8cA=; b=lNbIkTiyT5S0wyqZoOvHVi1bSX32BFG+hbr/ikYNNv3EdLgxCtgILI9NBe8p0qFj/o q7cd2ZF1aziWaH2Pu+q8x0s7L5vbXMbb4OWwi0g1fuRkLirYxU472hNipGzVbB28qQ+P j60b+7SAQvdap6QMQtLxa46gTzvE1YVTUJ7t0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=evK5SNgcOEihRvDuSG+eeDp+4Ff4oD6bdtl7Qjgx3VoXevB7Jczkaese5zSTWZdi6/ n4+HBNcXyxqYSGvhav9e9h0wzhEcpZC0e/HVJ4JWZ8q64DhVyyjNFYKvxgc6romf7Qim ObzzWmnbm6DcguWnF68/QmloMTMk5lYw/ttW4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.5 with SMTP id y5mr14275734wbt.204.1281387170686; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.168.73 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:52:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9mkKDURgH6M7xQcAh2MO9MzcUOs Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.89.20100726, our second 'developer release', is now available for download From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The HBase Team would like to announce the availability of the second in our 'developer release' series, hbase-0.89.20100726. Source binary and source tar balls are available here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ You can browse the documentation here: http://hbase.apache.org/docs/r0.89.20100726/ Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80 including our first cut at a working replication: See http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list. Our 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its definitely not for production deploys. See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions for more on the new hbase versoning and our developer releases series. Thanks to all who contributed to this release. Yours, St.Ack From general-return-1914-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 21:33:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72339 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 21:33:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 21:33:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 75367 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 21:33:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75279 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 21:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75271 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 21:33:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 21:33:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 21:32:56 +0000 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so5521735yxm.35 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:32:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XkRa8C5SVF0XdIO1ufiAa8yWueGdNujTH5Wy/xJBRaQ=; b=t+csTQ6GavHva2d4RMUYtg6nAaAKV0Q5PORv/RbUeUo9EQEBztDLu0tAk5zfYwjeM5 B0CGE6mYJihrT9TW/7cIB8z8pYyOALqAlO/rzlGJflXtp7QK/IC2MXG5Aaha19YrPsU8 /iezG4byp60DmFdafHlP8Eiq/fR1DzcAfJgk0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=d9lI/3+cqxdmC6RBBT3Z4ckvokOHjLr0DuiKKs6TSnR+JLzCqwIObgBIbEQeBUwytN kYNTHMKvbBvI0w2WHZZ/7s+INjHYvL6fseP4yMqq6Y3Lmwp8+UTfYBhBbC0wtQhBzGQA 36vUf0fB9ajG5s5Nhf6hY/7KMS5pmodYlHuOs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.27.19 with SMTP id a19mr2389425aga.54.1281389555065; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.15.73 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:32:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop node's locality From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65096d63fa3a7048d6ac1f4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65096d63fa3a7048d6ac1f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, thanks for answering, but I did find the answer out. I knew Hadoop did it, but I needed a reference. I found it in "Data-intensive Text Processing with MapReduce" in the page 25. I quoted here: Data/code co-location: . . . "An important optimization here is to prefer nodes that are on the same rack in the datacenter as the node holding the relevant data block, since inter-rack bandwidth is significantly less than intra-rack bandwidth." Thanks again. Renato M. 2010/8/9 vaibhav negi > Hi , > > I am also a nebie to hadoop. But i think u should read about "rack aware" > concept. > It may solve your query. > > Vaibhav Negi > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Does anybody know if Hadoop can take scheduling decisions using nodes > > positions > > within network topology ? Or if there is any work being done on this? > > Thanks in advanced. > > > > > > Renato M. > > > --0016e65096d63fa3a7048d6ac1f4-- From general-return-1915-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 09 22:16:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85751 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 22:16:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 22:16:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 15786 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 22:16:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15538 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2010 22:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15530 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 22:16:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:16:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:16:09 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so9822031wyb.35 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:15:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Pn/GEe7v0kvsEorMuv6ohZKLPCRXaqFNY0mlfWy1DM=; b=I1krujtotzrE4wZuJ9ZUlOhMQnUoHe//clYQyJ3dOustr+XSBsF5vr0CElMENpP0PT AX5BDLX9Yd2IfdiI9jGwycgH3z+3pbCy/ADd1kjth7HETDGVxAvSpw7NDp3uN4CrumUC sg0GRlIVHVroI3ujdzo6kZbOd5QCavSFJvwnQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U7pvCpvnNrwV5Op0XNt66Exvui3fiqAJTUpHb67zuLYTkfqEfuvR9azVrotnyhTuCk rLRrz1wJ5RbkQ6Gzn6pxdph3b2l62VyB/06m5MvupSTMz/4yjwEoASDbxotJIdOMImsR 83vYxmq3EQOYLa8dI5wK3aJMFW5BfB2vEQoi8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.232.90 with SMTP id m68mr14376757weq.10.1281392148332; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.160.71 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:15:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:15:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop node's locality From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The map-reduce scheduling does take block placement into account and attempts to schedule map tasks accordingly. The system is flexible, and HBase uses it to put maps colocated with the regionservers they read from. -ryan On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo wrote: > Hi, thanks for answering, but I did find the answer out. I knew Hadoop di= d > it, but I needed a reference. > I found it in "Data-intensive Text Processing with MapReduce" in the page > 25. > I quoted here: > > Data/code co-location: . . . "An important optimization here is to prefer > nodes that are on the same rack in the datacenter as the node holding the > relevant data block, since inter-rack bandwidth is significantly less tha= n > intra-rack bandwidth." > > Thanks again. > > > Renato M. > > > 2010/8/9 vaibhav negi > >> Hi , >> >> I am also a nebie to hadoop. But i think u should read about "rack aware= " >> concept. >> It may solve your query. >> >> Vaibhav Negi >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < >> renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > Does anybody know if Hadoop can take scheduling decisions using nodes >> > positions >> > within network topology ? Or if there is any work being done on this? >> > Thanks in advanced. >> > >> > >> > Renato M. >> > >> > From general-return-1916-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 00:41:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43786 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 00:41:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 00:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 961 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 00:41:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 829 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 00:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 821 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 00:41:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:41:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:40:58 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7A0eFOC057012 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hYWUMeXmrCuUCfRdYYsqiklhGV1S8c3kl2FX7KYCCoL6IiwknhhkC4CiFP5dP7Dm Message-ID: <4C609FEE.1050209@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:40:14 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/9/2010 9:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/08/2010 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, >> HDFS& Map-Reduce together and be done with? > > I think there's still a reasonable long-term goal to split MapReduce > from HDFS, so that they can release separately and are maintained by > separate teams. So I believe a strong division of these code trees and > release artifacts should remain. I think that eventually when we solve the backward compatibility issue, with Avro, we can make MR and HDFS different products. Even though right now they are not, it would be a step back to merge them back. As we look forward to making two different products, shouldn't there be two separate sets of committers? Of course, as long as they are not really separated it makes sense to have single committers pool. > I'd like to get rid of Common. It could either be merged into HDFS or > gradually whittled away to nothing. I'd prefer the latter. If we move > to different RPC and serialization systems (e.g., Avro) then Common's > io, and ipc packages might be removed. Configuration might be > replaced/merged with Jakarta Commons Configuration > (http://commons.apache.org/configuration/). Similarly, the metrics and > fs packages might be moved to Jakarta Commons. Such changes might be > hard to do back-compatibly, however. Great idea. We should do this. > I don't see that merging the Jira databases or mailing lists for HDFS > and MapReduce offers big advantages. The redundant, coordinated Jira's > tend to be between Common the others, no? Yes. --Konstantin From general-return-1917-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 05:26:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6085 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 05:26:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 05:26:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 22788 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 05:26:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22354 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 05:26:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22346 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 05:26:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:26:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [119.226.208.33] (HELO mail1.inmobi.com) (119.226.208.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:26:07 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcGABh/YEwKDmQH/2dsb2JhbAChQQbCL4U6BIQkhRaCTg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,346,1278268200"; d="scan'208";a="900368" Received: from mk-exch-1.mkhoj.com ([10.14.100.7]) by mail1.mkhoj.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2010 10:55:42 +0530 Received: from [10.14.100.74] (10.14.100.74) by MK-EXCH-1.MKHOJ.COM (10.14.100.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:52:42 +0530 Message-ID: <4C60E24F.7000100@inmobi.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:53:27 +0530 From: Rohan Rai User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.21 References: <4C5FF6C0.5000906@inmobi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thank You Tom for the information. Any hints on possible stable release. Regards Rohan Tom White wrote: > Hi Rohan, > > MAPREDUCE-1920 is blocking the next candidate. I'm going to create a > new candidate once this JIRA is resolved. > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Rohan Rai wrote: > >> Hi >> >> http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/hadoop-0.21.0-candidate-0/ >> >> Do we have any more candidate release after this. >> >> Thanking You >> Regards >> Rohan >> >> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for t= he >> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others >> authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privile= ged >> information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notifi= ed >> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in relia= nce >> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be >> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notif= y us >> immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your sys= tem. >> The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of t= he >> information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its >> receipt. >> >> > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the = use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authoriz= ed to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged informa= tion. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that an= y disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the= contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. I= f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediate= ly by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. The fir= m is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the informa= tion contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. From general-return-1918-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 08:01:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63263 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 08:01:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 08:01:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 32626 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 08:01:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31906 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 08:01:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31892 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 08:01:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:01:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.43.216.211] (HELO n1b.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (202.43.216.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:01:45 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.36] by n1.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 08:01:21 -0000 Received: from [202.165.102.49] by t1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 08:01:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp103.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 08:01:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 921665.20330.bm@omp103.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 6579 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Aug 2010 08:01:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281427281; bh=NkFwKDbH9TBKDip5ry6xBNLbnRognzRIxiwjk4pBC18=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bgM4muMgd05KTqAJYy9+6DGcCOqhonl0ueorSX2blvbXSKaSUp64Jeo5ez0RPL3FOKEqx2UlWQkmtFtS3jCp4ywSDjXyye19IbrGXwZmJXCaaZ7zisJ2w4mjf/7s+pxKQ3+hu0C9Rl/oI2ZuIwa1sJ+hvLMEr1IgvPu1a23cdHo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=op3pkvoQzpUiB0oVdkNXT6sT/MSrfigU/6BkTG2pDgwP8ywgSx63TYQaGtJukFpeH4dzvOPeEi6MI1JIh5fc1aEqqFufrZBstQcOHodvYPw9j446IVu5Zhl1ZMaWe5mJXAA966PbUYAWKh8ywlj2aKwdQYSzSTMzK21/Xy0uiEg=; Message-ID: <213553.84377.qm@web15204.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: vuOueWgVM1mUaRaNsZEarnQyIPzJglCwrBoVHnjN1oVY3Nv HGHvoWor4 Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15204.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:01:20 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:01:20 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: RawComparator To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1336986452-1281427280=:84377" --0-1336986452-1281427280=:84377 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, guys, I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" exmapl= e. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I just cannot = figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, Integer.SIZE / 8, b= 2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few javadocs of this clas= s or=A0 this method. 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? =A0=A0=A0 public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 RawComparator { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] b2= , int s2, int l2) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int ret =3D WritableComparator.compareBytes(b= 1, s1, Integer.SIZE / 8, =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)= ; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return ret; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int l =3D o1.getFirst(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int r =3D o2.getFirst(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return l =3D=3D r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 } Thanks. Dennis =0A=0A=0A --0-1336986452-1281427280=:84377-- From general-return-1919-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 12:49:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70589 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 12:49:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 12:49:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 78821 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 12:49:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78423 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 12:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78414 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 12:49:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:49:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.209.230.21] (HELO n4c.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (203.209.230.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:49:07 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.102] by n4.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 12:48:43 -0000 Received: from [203.209.230.75] by t2.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 12:48:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp104.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2010 12:48:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 31034.4273.bm@omp104.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 35790 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Aug 2010 12:48:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281444522; bh=l/ch6peDsyMnax7NaDhAhcAPHz+x8VXu5YOPtTVMCps=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5quw8HWRE9kCY+JCO7Dul7DZ/oBStHQi9kFJpWIScmv9tcMc2DFP/4OMUF5ghIlAwTPpQ5l/S7xt/l1U09B/mosqX6YaK24Rwn+l+Si26ql/y6p3bwOK8XVcW4jCw+0xTikxdr8D+egbhJZNUVPruKeOXCqrmqVuf9KTJsWLGPM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hk/6wZ3y/JL5K+oEPxXKsYj1+MScnRZc4up39y4nOm+08qquWY7rgYlVcg1SB4FfqZoLIi6vVl+q5GS79yBjAsvO+u1qGlUR6yvL91ftZfvGcz9IJGqTv+5aK6daBcTCiXYKG6yyd65jXz9aLFXUZb7F0MAV8Wx3xydrR5zzt0Y=; Message-ID: <918137.34655.qm@web15207.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: .Ufyq4MVM1mPgIqHJhToQkI4qrr3mZJdgPmykRlM2YsKYoa 749SyONVW.rwPX6DS6npzqx9VYrJYMoiq6aoS10nXNLkeEfXY.6KDSGOaqBV HzJFvHX3jYkOHrj4tKS8php_A469E.JOdiZFo8f6R0h9vB3_EJILOBBWLiCE 6KaGlPXSrJJx6OfDZAevgNiHAHWecQJlso5JaLt2FU1iI1qCy3s4j9sU6irS 4qWBe1Y7.0Xr6dPIHahKp2u.94J.bctITTQAR0PjupQ-- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15207.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:48:42 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:48:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Dennis Subject: about "RawComparator" class To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-11938642-1281444522=:34655" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-11938642-1281444522=:34655 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, guys, I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" exmapl= e. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I just cannot = figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, Integer.SIZE / 8, b= 2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few javadocs of this clas= s or=A0 this method. 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? =A0=A0=A0 public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 RawComparator { =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] = b2, int s2, int l2) { =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 int ret =3D WritableComparator.compareByt= es(b1, s1, Integer.SIZE / 8, =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 b2, s2, Integer.S= IZE / 8); =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 return ret; =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 int l =3D o1.getFirst(); =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 int r =3D o2.getFirst(); =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 return l =3D=3D r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 } Thanks. Dennis=0A=0A=0A --0-11938642-1281444522=:34655-- From general-return-1920-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 16:45:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71297 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 16:45:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 16:45:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 66171 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 16:45:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66070 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 16:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66062 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 16:45:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:45:19 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so10955944wyb.35 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.27.69 with SMTP id h5mr15122932wbc.210.1281458699096; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.20.206 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C609FEE.1050209@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> <4C609FEE.1050209@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:44:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215b01d528dd29a048d7ada75 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --002215b01d528dd29a048d7ada75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I'd like to get rid of Common. It could either be merged into HDFS or > > gradually whittled away to nothing. I'd prefer the latter. If we move > > to different RPC and serialization systems (e.g., Avro) then Common's > > io, and ipc packages might be removed. Configuration might be > > replaced/merged with Jakarta Commons Configuration > > (http://commons.apache.org/configuration/). Similarly, the metrics and > > fs packages might be moved to Jakarta Commons. Such changes might be > > hard to do back-compatibly, however. > > Great idea. We should do this. > Cool, created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6909 to track. --002215b01d528dd29a048d7ada75-- From general-return-1921-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 17:25:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88654 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 17:25:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 17:25:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 37882 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 17:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37729 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 17:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37721 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 17:25:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:25:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:25:15 +0000 Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so2022813pvg.35 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.211.6 with SMTP id j6mr15026130wfg.126.1281461093689; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.179.20 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:24:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/08/2010 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >> This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, >> HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? > > I think there's still a reasonable long-term goal to split MapReduce from > HDFS, so that they can release separately and are maintained by separate > teams. =A0So I believe a strong division of these code trees and release > artifacts should remain. > > I'd like to get rid of Common. =A0It could either be merged into HDFS or > gradually whittled away to nothing. =A0I'd prefer the latter. =A0If we mo= ve to > different RPC and serialization systems (e.g., Avro) then Common's io, an= d > ipc packages might be removed. =A0Configuration might be replaced/merged = with > Jakarta Commons Configuration (http://commons.apache.org/configuration/). > =A0Similarly, the metrics and fs packages might be moved to Jakarta Commo= ns. > =A0Such changes might be hard to do back-compatibly, however. Merging the o.a.h.fs back into the hdfs repo would be helpful. It's a pain to develop a file system with client and server split into multiple repositories, and the other fs implementations probably do not want their own repository since they need to get updated when the clients change as well. Developing and releasing hadoop post-project split has been a pain, going back to two repos (merging common and hdfs) or a single repo would make the life of people developing and releasing easier. As you point out, users want to consume hadoop as a single project and not worry about common, mr and hdfs as separately released and versioned components, so I'm not sure which community the split is serving. Thanks, Eli > > I don't see that merging the Jira databases or mailing lists for HDFS and > MapReduce offers big advantages. =A0The redundant, coordinated Jira's ten= d to > be between Common the others, no? > > Doug > From general-return-1922-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 10 19:22:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35863 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 19:22:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 19:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 15068 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 19:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14724 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2010 19:22:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14709 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2010 19:22:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:22:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:22:21 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so12058057qwd.35 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:21:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.103.130 with SMTP id k2mr10033090qao.63.1281468110999; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.238.194 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <213553.84377.qm@web15204.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> References: <213553.84377.qm@web15204.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:21:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RawComparator From: Josh Patterson To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000feaeadea28d6e28048d7d0b1b --000feaeadea28d6e28048d7d0b1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dennis, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Dennis wrote: > Hi, guys, > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" > exmaple. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I just > cannot figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, > Integer.SIZE / 8, b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few > javadocs of this class or this method. > 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? > That says "take the size of the integer in bits on this system and divide it by 8" --- which in java on 32 and 64 bit systems should give you 32 / 8 == 4 as afaik the integer bit width doesnt change based on the architecture with java. So its saying here "compare the first 4 bytes of each byte array" (the width, in bytes, of the first integer in the composite key) ,whereas Integer.SIZE gives the number of bits in the datatype. WritableComparators are useful in the shuffle phase of hadoop; we are constantly comparing and sorting WritableComparables, and the secondary sorting mechanics allow us to have a group of data for a key arrive at the reducer in a certain order (example: time series data, where we want a range of timestamps in one group, but we also want them in order when they are processed inside the reducer) > 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? > > public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements > RawComparator { > @Override > public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] b2, int s2, > int l2) { > int ret = WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, Integer.SIZE > / 8, > b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8); > return ret; > } > > @Override > public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { > int l = o1.getFirst(); > int r = o2.getFirst(); > return l == r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); > } > } > In the case of the comparison of strings, lets say for example you have a "composite key" that has two String or Text object members (k1, k2); We "group by" the first part of the key k1 and we sort by this key as well (we block ranges together). This is very similar to the example above. Since with a RawComparator we are looking to only deserialize a portion of the data to do the comparison, you'll need a strategy for the compare() function that takes into account that the strings are variable length (which means we are unable to simply read 4 bytes as in the case of the integer). The challenge here is to only deserialize the portion of the composite key that contains the string/text that you want to compare against, which is going to be a variable number of bytes each time. A good place to start looking at for ideas would be the Text class in Hadoop and also WritableUtils. Josh Patterson Cloudera > Thanks. > Dennis > > --000feaeadea28d6e28048d7d0b1b-- From general-return-1923-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 01:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78351 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 01:07:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 01:07:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 65635 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 01:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65518 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 01:07:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65491 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 01:07:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:07:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.43.217.38] (HELO n1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com) (202.43.217.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:07:35 +0000 Received: from [203.209.230.73] by n1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 01:07:10 -0000 Received: from [202.165.102.49] by t3.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 01:07:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp103.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 01:07:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 656543.1568.bm@omp103.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 22847 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Aug 2010 01:07:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281488830; bh=XeQyBDp2gBSI5S2SwVI2YvjMsdYjLN7RgnEkSJDFJYc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EKuzV0yqBXqUOlTqenlrD/z8/nscWgpZYW1o0lJbwwGFf1G2d1RMR3KhDmyXBXQwumZKjhAaJVyElfZ8TV3uwiCKmiSYJ1OVcpGLVrUz/alZmGjTfrQoKIVnUtNh9EFF/mli0Ckf9S37PnfnTKMMhpRoetz/CF2xqj3zipWm2cQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=y5Pm04m+2YfwsgEYth4O+WT4GyUspmbibK3bMD26TizEC1m1lON1dPbJyCY841dSWzJiogE4A7bK/gpIbRd4XjTyglj7W/z5IwncpvSY4+/CZqKV6HICC/eHS8WKPSpaTXV8597sOuT/YXGaBBulptq1TZqnevWP52lBJLjQntw=; Message-ID: <502939.22759.qm@web15206.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: woCd9t0VM1lQkZ4mlJ0IdGj9jVocFLu9mOTpCunnRk9zKMh _2p.1wZpOZGhz7ihRehSJYw.EvkwW5lCcYZLv4Eakl67tFlmMqldPg3rcE2. ch5iFFyBuxjakscCHGK1lQU0xFz0ZelTeD1NoDbakMMhie.0gua5rSTQZlM3 n8DrIdG9YOCG7f60NfopdVfFPTai7di6.o6PEBBw_riDpkDHuqwCCYLiihnN WnTP5RR.pfDetwu6RCfhCNUF_N0P34_dG_MsaxDrLcTxT5JD3tCF6idRQ9JV fKiUn9b5b3K9qUIo- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15206.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:07:10 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:07:10 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: Re: RawComparator To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-435010945-1281488830=:22759" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-435010945-1281488830=:22759 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Josh, for your professional answers. The following is my "composite key" class. And in the Q1003InPairComparator= .compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] b2, int s2, int l2) method, I fi= gured out two ways of picking up original String values and comparing. The = first "using streams" one is using java.io.* package to deserialize the ori= ginal String values, and the comparision is easy to do. The second "using b= yte[]" one, I just try to deserialize the byte[] by myself, as it's not dif= ficult to do this, and I donnot have to "new" any stream classes in java.io= .*. So, 1. What do you say about the two methods? Or any better ones? 2. If I use the first "using streams" one, what do I deal with the IOExcept= ion? If an Exception is thrown, what value should I return?(In the followin= g code, I simply returned -1. I know it's not smart to do so.) =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPair implements WritableComparable { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String dateStr; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String str; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void set(String dateStr, String str) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.dateStr =3D dateStr; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.str =3D str; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getDateStr() { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.dateStr; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getStr() { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.str; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOException= { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 dateStr =3D in.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 str =3D in.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(dateStr); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(str); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int hashCode() { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final int prime =3D 31; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int result =3D 1; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 + ((dateStr =3D=3D null) = ? 0 : dateStr.hashCode()); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result + ((str =3D=3D null= ) ? 0 : str.hashCode()); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return result; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public boolean equals(Object obj) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (this =3D=3D obj) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (obj =3D=3D null) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (getClass() !=3D obj.getClass()) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final Q1003InPair other =3D (Q1003InPair) obj= ; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (dateStr =3D=3D null) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.dateStr !=3D null) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!dateStr.equals(other.dateStr)) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str =3D=3D null) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.str !=3D null) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!str.equals(other.str)) =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String toString() { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 StringBuffer sb =3D new StringBuffer(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getDateStr()); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(","); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getStr()); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return sb.toString(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPairComparator extends Writa= bleComparator { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public Q1003InPairComparator() { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 super(Q1003InPair.class); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1,= byte[] b2, int s2, =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int l2) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 1. using streams =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais1 =3D n= ull; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais2 =3D n= ull; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis1 =3D null; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis2 =3D null; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1 =3D new ByteArrayInputStre= am(b1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1 =3D new DataInputStream(bai= s1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.skip(s1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str1 =3D dis1.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str3 =3D dis1.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 //=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0= =A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=20 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2 =3D new ByteArrayInputStre= am(b2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2 =3D new DataInputStream(bai= s2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.skip(s2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str2 =3D dis2.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str4 =3D dis2.readUTF(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 //=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0= =A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=20 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // if (str1.equals(str2)) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str3.compareTo(str4); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } else { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str1.compareTo(str2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } finally { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.close(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.close(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1.close(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2.close(); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return -1; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 2. using byte[] =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength1 =3D ((int) b1[s1]) *= 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str1 =3D new String(b1, s1 += 2, strLength1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s1 +=3D strLength1 + 2; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength3 =3D ((int) b1[s1]) *= 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str3 =3D new String(b1, s1 += 2, strLength3); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength2 =3D ((int) b2[s2]) *= 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str2 =3D new String(b2, s2 += 2, strLength2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s2 +=3D strLength2 + 2; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength4 =3D ((int) b2[s2]) *= 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str4 =3D new String(b2, s2 += 2, strLength4); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str1.equals(str2)) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str3.compareTo(str= 4); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str1.compareTo(str= 2); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 static { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 WritableComparator.define(Q1003InPair.class, =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 new Q1003InPairComparator= ()); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compareTo(Q1003InPair o) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (!this.getDateStr().equals(o.getDateStr())= ) { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getDateStr().equals(o.g= etDateStr()) ? 0 : (this =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .getDateStr().c= ompareTo(o.getDateStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!this.getStr().equals(o.getStr()))= { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getStr().equals(o.getSt= r()) ? 0 : (this.getStr() =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .compareTo(o.ge= tStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return 0; =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } =A0=A0=A0 } Thanks again. Dennis --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Josh Patterson wrote: From: Josh Patterson Subject: Re: RawComparator To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 3:21 AM Dennis, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Dennis wrote: > Hi, guys, > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" > exmaple. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I just > cannot figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, > Integer.SIZE / 8, b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few > javadocs of this class or=A0 this method. > 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? > That says "take the size of the integer in bits on this system and divide i= t by 8" --- which in java on 32 and 64 bit systems should give you 32 / 8 =3D= =3D 4 as afaik the integer bit width doesnt change based on the architecture with java. So its saying here "compare the first 4 bytes of each byte array" (th= e width, in bytes, of the first integer in the composite key) ,whereas Integer.SIZE gives the number of bits in the datatype. WritableComparators are useful in the shuffle phase of hadoop; we are constantly comparing and sorting WritableComparables, and the secondary sorting mechanics allow us to have a group of data for a key arrive at the reducer in a certain order (example: time series data, where we want a rang= e of timestamps in one group, but we also want them in order when they are processed inside the reducer) > 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? > >=A0 =A0=A0=A0public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0RawComparator { >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] = b2, int s2, > int l2) { >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int ret =3D WritableComparator.compareBytes(b= 1, s1, Integer.SIZE > / 8, >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8); >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return ret; >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} > >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int l =3D o1.getFirst(); >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int r =3D o2.getFirst(); >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return l =3D=3D r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} >=A0 =A0=A0=A0} > In the case of the comparison of strings, lets say for example you have a "composite key" that has two String or Text object members (k1, k2); We "group by" the first part of the key k1 and we sort by this key as well (we block ranges together). This is very similar to the example above. Since with a RawComparator we are looking to only deserialize a portion of the data to do the comparison, you'll need a strategy for the compare() functio= n that takes into account that the strings are variable length (which means w= e are unable to simply read 4 bytes as in the case of the integer). The challenge here is to only deserialize the portion of the composite key that contains the string/text that you want to compare against, which is going t= o be a variable number of bytes each time. A good place to start looking at for ideas would be the Text class in Hadoop and also WritableUtils. Josh Patterson Cloudera > Thanks. > Dennis > > =0A=0A=0A --0-435010945-1281488830=:22759-- From general-return-1924-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 04:03:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33719 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 04:03:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 04:03:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63484 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 04:03:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63023 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 04:03:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63008 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 04:03:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:03:16 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.5] (S010600179a276713.ok.shawcable.net [24.71.145.57]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L6Y00CO5Z8U1D30@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008100266 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-11_02:2010-08-11,2010-08-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:02:54 -0700 Message-id: <5C1597A8-3413-4858-A036-0629FCE7D8E9@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) +1 on merging the committer lists for now. I think separating them was trying to solve for problems that we don't actually have in our community. We can always separate them again later if needed. n. On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Hadoop developers tend to specialize in either HDFS or MapReduce, but > given that: > > 0) Granting karma to Common is routine for a committer in either > space; there are no Common-only committers > 1) The majority of committers have been grandfathered into committer > roles in all three projects > 2) Many patches to Common require corresponding commits to both HDFS > and MapReduce > 3) Review-then-commit is usually sufficient notice for interested > parties to comment > 4) There have been few problems with committers pushing in patches > without consulting someone more directly involved > 5) Everyone on the PMC gets commit rights to all subprojects, anyway > > Perhaps it would make sense to give up on separate committer roles > until the projects are separate TLPs. > > On the other hand: > > 0) Nobody has been independently added to both HDFS and MapReduce > since the projects were separated > 1) It could exacerbate the focus on MapReduce in HDFS, at the expense > of other projects (like HBase). > 2) HDFS and MapReduce are mostly independent communities and > codebases; expertise in one does not imply fluency in the other > 3) Granting veto power across projects can lead to deadlock despite > consensus within that community > 4) TLP status for either project may require untangling HDFS/MR roles > that could be distinguished now > > Personally, I'm in favor of combining the roles. I trust all six of > the committers made since the project split no less than those made > earlier. Further, version control is sufficient for recovering from > most, foreseeable issues. I have some concerns about "harmless" > commits pushed through without an audit by the subproject's > maintainers (a few in recent memory caused downtime in Y! clusters), > but combining the roles seems like a worthwhile experiment. > > Thoughts? -C From general-return-1925-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 05:05:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50697 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 05:05:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:05:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 99030 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 05:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98872 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 05:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98864 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 05:05:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:05:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:05:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.73.152.253]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7B54p2X080337 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:04:51 -0700 References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/08/2010 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, >> HDFS & Map-Reduce together and be done with? > > I think there's still a reasonable long-term goal to split MapReduce > from HDFS, so that they can release separately and are maintained by > separate teams. So I believe a strong division of these code trees > and > release artifacts should remain. It is clear from the comments on this thread that the move to split HDFS and Map-Reduce into separate projects has been a mixed bag - maybe a net negative. It has caused issues we as a community haven't dealt well with. So, we need to make a decision - do we stick the course, get through the painful process and emerge stronger or do we take a step back and regress a decision we made back then? The current proposal to merge committer lists seems like a regression. Arun From general-return-1926-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 05:36:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57688 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 05:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 05:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 23743 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 05:36:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23362 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 05:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23354 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 05:36:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:36:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:36:35 +0000 Received: from [10.66.72.163] (sightbusy-lx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.72.163]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7B5ZQEW031435 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:35:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hxe/EcvTnOQNPB2sQwTbi3OVimVJrmSrxVzU8kgS/v3oHYw2QdYBiLoEbcSOfkCP Message-ID: <4C62369D.6000703@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:05:25 +0530 From: Vinod KV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I know of very few to nearly zero number of patches in mapreduce that touch HDFS also. And vice versa. The common case is of patches that touch both common and mapreduce or common and hdfs. I am one of those who has access to mapreduce project but not to common project and find more than 50% of the patches that fall into this category. (*) May be then we should simply knock off the separate list for common project and maintain separate lists for mapreduce and hdfs members of which will automatically have karma for the common project. As for the separation of the repositories, I personally felt separation of mapreduce from hdfs helped focusing on things a lot better. The last gasp work done for 0.21, mostly by Tom, did help a lot in decoupling the projects. Common is the hot point, sure, but as others noted, that is a separate discussion. My few cents. +vinod On Wednesday 11 August 2010 10:34 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > >> On 08/08/2010 12:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> This of course begs a larger question - should we just merge Common, >>> HDFS& Map-Reduce together and be done with? >>> >> I think there's still a reasonable long-term goal to split MapReduce >> from HDFS, so that they can release separately and are maintained by >> separate teams. So I believe a strong division of these code trees >> and >> release artifacts should remain. >> > It is clear from the comments on this thread that the move to split > HDFS and Map-Reduce into separate projects has been a mixed bag - > maybe a net negative. > > It has caused issues we as a community haven't dealt well with. > > So, we need to make a decision - do we stick the course, get through > the painful process and emerge stronger or do we take a step back and > regress a decision we made back then? The current proposal to merge > committer lists seems like a regression. > > Arun > > > > > From general-return-1927-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 15:07:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80080 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 15:07:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 15:07:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 53800 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:07:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53547 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:07:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53539 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 15:07:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:07:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:07:39 +0000 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so298210qyk.14 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.20.13 with SMTP id d13mr11016672qab.258.1281539238099; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.238.194 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <502939.22759.qm@web15206.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> References: <502939.22759.qm@web15206.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RawComparator From: Josh Patterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dennis, Well, in general, consider this: this method is getting called per K/V pair potentially billions or even trillions of times. We want to do the minimum amount of work that we can here and get the most results to get the best performance, right? If we think about the lower levels of memory and using the stack, we want to allocate as little memory as possible since at the rate we'd be creating new objects on the heap we'd really be tearing through some memory. Without doing testing myself (which you should do, this is easy to test, data always dominates these discussions), I'm going to bet that the byte[] manipulations are going to be more performant. If you can pull out the number of bytes (from the first byte or two, like Text does it) from the front of the byte array, then you can deserialize only the part of the composite key you are interested in. If you can do this without creating new objects on the heap, I'd say you are going to get better performance (just like as in the previous example where we deserialized the first 4 bytes of the integer, that made up the int pair). Josh Patterson Cloudera On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Dennis wrote: > Thanks, Josh, for your professional answers. > > The following is my "composite key" class. And in the Q1003InPairComparat= or.compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] b2, int s2, int l2) method, I = figured out two ways of picking up original String values and comparing. Th= e first "using streams" one is using java.io.* package to deserialize the o= riginal String values, and the comparision is easy to do. The second "using= byte[]" one, I just try to deserialize the byte[] by myself, as it's not d= ifficult to do this, and I donnot have to "new" any stream classes in java.= io.*. > So, > 1. What do you say about the two methods? Or any better ones? > 2. If I use the first "using streams" one, what do I deal with the IOExce= ption? If an Exception is thrown, what value should I return?(In the follow= ing code, I simply returned -1. I know it's not smart to do so.) > > > =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPair implements WritableComparable { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String str; > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void set(String dateStr, String str) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.dateStr =3D dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.str =3D str; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getDateStr() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getStr() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.str; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOExcepti= on { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 dateStr =3D in.readUTF(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 str =3D in.readUTF(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException = { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(dateStr); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(str); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int hashCode() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final int prime =3D 31; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int result =3D 1; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 + ((dateStr =3D=3D null= ) ? 0 : dateStr.hashCode()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result + ((str =3D=3D nu= ll) ? 0 : str.hashCode()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return result; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public boolean equals(Object obj) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (this =3D=3D obj) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (obj =3D=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (getClass() !=3D obj.getClass()) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final Q1003InPair other =3D (Q1003InPair) o= bj; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (dateStr =3D=3D null) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.dateStr !=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!dateStr.equals(other.dateStr)) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str =3D=3D null) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.str !=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!str.equals(other.str)) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String toString() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 StringBuffer sb =3D new StringBuffer(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getDateStr()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(","); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getStr()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return sb.toString(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPairComparator extends Wri= tableComparator { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public Q1003InPairComparator() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 super(Q1003InPair.class); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l= 1, byte[] b2, int s2, > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int l2) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 1. using streams > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais1 =3D= null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais2 =3D= null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis1 =3D null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis2 =3D null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1 =3D new ByteArrayInputSt= ream(b1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1 =3D new DataInputStream(b= ais1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.skip(s1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str1 =3D dis1.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str3 =3D dis1.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2 =3D new ByteArrayInputSt= ream(b2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2 =3D new DataInputStream(b= ais2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.skip(s2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str2 =3D dis2.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str4 =3D dis2.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // if (str1.equals(str2)) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str3.compareTo(str4); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str1.compareTo(str2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } finally { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return -1; > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 2. using byte[] > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength1 =3D ((int) b1[s1])= * 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str1 =3D new String(b1, s1= + 2, strLength1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s1 +=3D strLength1 + 2; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength3 =3D ((int) b1[s1])= * 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str3 =3D new String(b1, s1= + 2, strLength3); > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength2 =3D ((int) b2[s2])= * 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str2 =3D new String(b2, s2= + 2, strLength2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s2 +=3D strLength2 + 2; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength4 =3D ((int) b2[s2])= * 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str4 =3D new String(b2, s2= + 2, strLength4); > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str1.equals(str2)) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str3.compareTo(s= tr4); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str1.compareTo(s= tr2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 static { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 WritableComparator.define(Q1003InPair.class= , > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 new Q1003InPairComparat= or()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compareTo(Q1003InPair o) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (!this.getDateStr().equals(o.getDateStr(= ))) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getDateStr().equals(o= .getDateStr()) ? 0 : (this > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .getDateStr()= .compareTo(o.getDateStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!this.getStr().equals(o.getStr()= )) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getStr().equals(o.get= Str()) ? 0 : (this.getStr() > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .compareTo(o.= getStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return 0; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 } > > Thanks again. > Dennis > > > --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Josh Patterson wrote: > > From: Josh Patterson > Subject: Re: RawComparator > To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 3:21 AM > > Dennis, > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Dennis wrote: > >> Hi, guys, >> >> I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" >> exmaple. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I jus= t >> cannot figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, >> Integer.SIZE / 8, b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few >> javadocs of this class or=A0 this method. >> 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? >> > > That says "take the size of the integer in bits on this system and divide= it > by 8" --- which in java on 32 and 64 bit systems should give you 32 / 8 = =3D=3D 4 > as afaik the integer bit width doesnt change based on the architecture wi= th > java. So its saying here "compare the first 4 bytes of each byte array" (= the > width, in bytes, of the first integer in the composite key) ,whereas > Integer.SIZE gives the number of bits in the datatype. > > WritableComparators are useful in the shuffle phase of hadoop; we are > constantly comparing and sorting WritableComparables, and the secondary > sorting mechanics allow us to have a group of data for a key arrive at th= e > reducer in a certain order (example: time series data, where we want a ra= nge > of timestamps in one group, but we also want them in order when they are > processed inside the reducer) > > >> 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? >> >>=A0 =A0=A0=A0public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0RawComparator { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[]= b2, int s2, >> int l2) { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int ret =3D WritableComparator.compareBytes(= b1, s1, Integer.SIZE >> / 8, >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return ret; >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} >> >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int l =3D o1.getFirst(); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int r =3D o2.getFirst(); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return l =3D=3D r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} >>=A0 =A0=A0=A0} >> > > In the case of the comparison of strings, lets say for example you have a > "composite key" that has two String or Text object members (k1, k2); We > "group by" the first part of the key k1 and we sort by this key as well (= we > block ranges together). This is very similar to the example above. Since > with a RawComparator we are looking to only deserialize a portion of the > data to do the comparison, you'll need a strategy for the compare() funct= ion > that takes into account that the strings are variable length (which means= we > are unable to simply read 4 bytes as in the case of the integer). The > challenge here is to only deserialize the portion of the composite key th= at > contains the string/text that you want to compare against, which is going= to > be a variable number of bytes each time. A good place to start looking at > for ideas would be the Text class in Hadoop and also WritableUtils. > > Josh Patterson > Cloudera > > > >> Thanks. >> Dennis >> >> > > > > From general-return-1928-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 16:52:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7854 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 16:51:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 16:51:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 46388 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:51:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46313 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46305 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 15:51:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:51:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:51:49 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so316189bwz.35 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:51:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.114.5 with SMTP id c5mr4486447bkq.171.1281541887970; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:51:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C62369D.6000703@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> <4C62369D.6000703@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:51:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Vinod KV wrote: > > I am one of those who has access to > mapreduce project but not to common project This looks like an oversight to me, which we should remedy. Also, I did a little analysis, and there are only six committers out of a total of 30 that do not have commit privileges for all three subprojects. So, practically speaking, it would not be a big change to give all committers privileges across the projects. Tom From general-return-1929-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 16:56:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13066 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 16:56:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 16:56:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 53311 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:54:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53242 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 15:54:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53234 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 15:54:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:54:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swhitecross@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:54:26 +0000 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so123319gwj.35 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S9LjCD+T2etgW/zEAHTVoOxoUJj1FEbzvDgMe7btQs0=; b=q/YbtBlmYqYVZZdjei5BSGTxUg+wKLr4Wfs0M2hm0mQ1YMIVtxdeAkAdiAXNePyFT5 +Sh8uREBd+h059qXjsK7nBFbhECco45FgSg5VgAt5N7l05RLfAzSvjZJo6Nzr1J3HtmP 9JKUm0OWNw+YskoRrin36pEbeDQ1x5/YhJh34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iBRsz4LhunH9PXoIrBbLT9vGhkoIYCLiboJOl+LD4xTq88nhEpvYvogBSMOMOW/G/y U1Vj1sEjv6zFnBRJgHI/cF7CYD6rLqWdrWcSXm5+yZz06+gHpeANl2pbg3an5yIBGWHB jmr1wZtZ0rCgRhdkMzs7gfNH562gkzybZMPK8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.209.13 with SMTP id l13mr21725024anq.238.1281542045252; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.128.204 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:54:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Listing Hadoop Job History Statistics From: Scott Whitecross To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68bd3fe5f3cd5048d8e42c4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68bd3fe5f3cd5048d8e42c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi - What's the best way to list and query information on Hadoop job histories? For example, I'd like to see the job names from the past week against a Hadoop cluster I'm using. I don't see an API call or a way through the command line to pull the information. Is the best way writing a quick script to process the job history files? Thanks. Scott --0016e68bd3fe5f3cd5048d8e42c4-- From general-return-1930-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 17:13:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30881 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 17:13:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 17:13:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9465 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 17:13:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9383 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 17:13:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9375 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 17:13:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:13:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.43.216.213] (HELO n3b.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (202.43.216.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:13:05 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.36] by n3.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 17:12:42 -0000 Received: from [203.209.230.77] by t1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 17:12:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp106.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Aug 2010 17:12:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 999475.6109.bm@omp106.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 85034 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Aug 2010 17:12:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281546761; bh=mnjLnEhRl7t4b2CXWnAvoGv3/clio9xyTEGPiz9dl5s=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QLuyg71h9eehUYIAmog9GkdcOKrgYyrvZ765oe8WfT6RA8Xo8V/Ng+LVLgf/2l1EuR5zPfJSTZIXg7smoI7b1dQwyixtyr6NNvtYL5F3S8VaHoS5eaX4iV5vmNXih+DIsyivreqgBOk9g9q61KryIIS4so59brr/h/Eli+sQKKY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4BYl+yL4UvA80nzjimGk9GEa+0IP+fX4ZkMLn+z5A1SPtm76Yv44O/5CBLM/dSLQZbUYMZesG86YRLvV5YIS7xNBPk5sDuvdedf5RbQq/XtGkArJm0+gD+l0BoZ64q5U4kuR34Lxn6v9zhD2Wl7D5nHW/fnV77klgEnyHgDEr5Y=; Message-ID: <856580.84210.qm@web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: bQqPP7QVM1mKHimQykNhrTLZ9VUEBY0sZbz4JkLWnv3lKoa A_yi7Qs8O Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:12:41 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:12:41 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: Re: RawComparator To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-249652734-1281546761=:84210" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-249652734-1281546761=:84210 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Josh, Yes, you right. The byte[] manipulations is much faster, as it's not creati= ng new objects, just like you said. Thanks again, I've learned a lot from this example, and you've been very he= lpful. Dennis --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Josh Patterson wrote: From: Josh Patterson Subject: Re: RawComparator To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 11:07 PM Dennis, Well, in general, consider this: this method is getting called per K/V pair potentially billions or even trillions of times. We want to do the minimum amount of work that we can here and get the most results to get the best performance, right? If we think about the lower levels of memory and using the stack, we want to allocate as little memory as possible since at the rate we'd be creating new objects on the heap we'd really be tearing through some memory. Without doing testing myself (which you should do, this is easy to test, data always dominates these discussions), I'm going to bet that the byte[] manipulations are going to be more performant. If you can pull out the number of bytes (from the first byte or two, like Text does it) from the front of the byte array, then you can deserialize only the part of the composite key you are interested in. If you can do this without creating new objects on the heap, I'd say you are going to get better performance (just like as in the previous example where we deserialized the first 4 bytes of the integer, that made up the int pair). Josh Patterson Cloudera On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Dennis wrote: > Thanks, Josh, for your professional answers. > > The following is my "composite key" class. And in the Q1003InPairComparat= or.compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[] b2, int s2, int l2) method, I = figured out two ways of picking up original String values and comparing. Th= e first "using streams" one is using java.io.* package to deserialize the o= riginal String values, and the comparision is easy to do. The second "using= byte[]" one, I just try to deserialize the byte[] by myself, as it's not d= ifficult to do this, and I donnot have to "new" any stream classes in java.= io.*. > So, > 1. What do you say about the two methods? Or any better ones? > 2. If I use the first "using streams" one, what do I deal with the IOExce= ption? If an Exception is thrown, what value should I return?(In the follow= ing code, I simply returned -1. I know it's not smart to do so.) > > > =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPair implements WritableComparable { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 private String str; > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void set(String dateStr, String str) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.dateStr =3D dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 this.str =3D str; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getDateStr() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.dateStr; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String getStr() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.str; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOExcepti= on { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 dateStr =3D in.readUTF(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 str =3D in.readUTF(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException = { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(dateStr); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 out.writeUTF(str); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int hashCode() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final int prime =3D 31; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int result =3D 1; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 + ((dateStr =3D=3D null= ) ? 0 : dateStr.hashCode()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 result =3D prime * result + ((str =3D=3D nu= ll) ? 0 : str.hashCode()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return result; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public boolean equals(Object obj) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (this =3D=3D obj) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (obj =3D=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (getClass() !=3D obj.getClass()) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 final Q1003InPair other =3D (Q1003InPair) o= bj; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (dateStr =3D=3D null) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.dateStr !=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!dateStr.equals(other.dateStr)) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str =3D=3D null) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (other.str !=3D null) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!str.equals(other.str)) > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return false; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return true; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public String toString() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 StringBuffer sb =3D new StringBuffer(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getDateStr()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(","); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 sb.append(this.getStr()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return sb.toString(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public static class Q1003InPairComparator extends Wri= tableComparator { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public Q1003InPairComparator() { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 super(Q1003InPair.class); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l= 1, byte[] b2, int s2, > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int l2) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 1. using streams > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais1 =3D= null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // ByteArrayInputStream bais2 =3D= null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis1 =3D null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // DataInputStream dis2 =3D null; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1 =3D new ByteArrayInputSt= ream(b1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1 =3D new DataInputStream(b= ais1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.skip(s1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str1 =3D dis1.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str3 =3D dis1.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2 =3D new ByteArrayInputSt= ream(b2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2 =3D new DataInputStream(b= ais2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.skip(s2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str2 =3D dis2.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // String str4 =3D dis2.readUTF()= ; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // if (str1.equals(str2)) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str3.compareTo(str4); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return str1.compareTo(str2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } finally { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis1.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // dis2.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais1.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // try { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // bais2.close(); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } catch(Exception e) {} > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // return -1; > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 // 2. using byte[] > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength1 =3D ((int) b1[s1])= * 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str1 =3D new String(b1, s1= + 2, strLength1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s1 +=3D strLength1 + 2; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength3 =3D ((int) b1[s1])= * 256 + ((int) b1[s1 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str3 =3D new String(b1, s1= + 2, strLength3); > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength2 =3D ((int) b2[s2])= * 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str2 =3D new String(b2, s2= + 2, strLength2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 s2 +=3D strLength2 + 2; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 int strLength4 =3D ((int) b2[s2])= * 256 + ((int) b2[s2 + 1]); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 String str4 =3D new String(b2, s2= + 2, strLength4); > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (str1.equals(str2)) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str3.compareTo(s= tr4); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return str1.compareTo(s= tr2); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 static { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 WritableComparator.define(Q1003InPair.class= , > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 new Q1003InPairComparat= or()); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 @Override > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 public int compareTo(Q1003InPair o) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 if (!this.getDateStr().equals(o.getDateStr(= ))) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getDateStr().equals(o= .getDateStr()) ? 0 : (this > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .getDateStr()= .compareTo(o.getDateStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else if (!this.getStr().equals(o.getStr()= )) { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return this.getStr().equals(o.get= Str()) ? 0 : (this.getStr() > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 .compareTo(o.= getStr()) > 0 ? 1 : -1); > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } else { > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 return 0; > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 } > =A0=A0=A0 } > > Thanks again. > Dennis > > > --- On Wed, 8/11/10, Josh Patterson wrote: > > From: Josh Patterson > Subject: Re: RawComparator > To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 3:21 AM > > Dennis, > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Dennis wrote: > >> Hi, guys, >> >> I am using hadoop 0.20.2, and I am trying to run the "SecondarySort" >> exmaple. The following is the "FirstGroupingComparator" class, and I jus= t >> cannot figure out how "WritableComparator.compareBytes(b1, s1, >> Integer.SIZE / 8, b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8)" works. There are really few >> javadocs of this class or=A0 this method. >> 1. Why it is "Integer.SIZE / 8"? >> > > That says "take the size of the integer in bits on this system and divide= it > by 8" --- which in java on 32 and 64 bit systems should give you 32 / 8 = =3D=3D 4 > as afaik the integer bit width doesnt change based on the architecture wi= th > java. So its saying here "compare the first 4 bytes of each byte array" (= the > width, in bytes, of the first integer in the composite key) ,whereas > Integer.SIZE gives the number of bits in the datatype. > > WritableComparators are useful in the shuffle phase of hadoop; we are > constantly comparing and sorting WritableComparables, and the secondary > sorting mechanics allow us to have a group of data for a key arrive at th= e > reducer in a certain order (example: time series data, where we want a ra= nge > of timestamps in one group, but we also want them in order when they are > processed inside the reducer) > > >> 2. If I want to compare two "String" here, how should I write to code? >> >>=A0 =A0=A0=A0public static class FirstGroupingComparator implements >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0RawComparator { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(byte[] b1, int s1, int l1, byte[]= b2, int s2, >> int l2) { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int ret =3D WritableComparator.compareBytes(= b1, s1, Integer.SIZE >> / 8, >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0b2, s2, Integer.SIZE / 8); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return ret; >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} >> >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0@Override >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0public int compare(IntPair o1, IntPair o2) { >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int l =3D o1.getFirst(); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0int r =3D o2.getFirst(); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0return l =3D=3D r ? 0 : (l < r ? -1 : 1); >>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0=A0} >>=A0 =A0=A0=A0} >> > > In the case of the comparison of strings, lets say for example you have a > "composite key" that has two String or Text object members (k1, k2); We > "group by" the first part of the key k1 and we sort by this key as well (= we > block ranges together). This is very similar to the example above. Since > with a RawComparator we are looking to only deserialize a portion of the > data to do the comparison, you'll need a strategy for the compare() funct= ion > that takes into account that the strings are variable length (which means= we > are unable to simply read 4 bytes as in the case of the integer). The > challenge here is to only deserialize the portion of the composite key th= at > contains the string/text that you want to compare against, which is going= to > be a variable number of bytes each time. A good place to start looking at > for ideas would be the Text class in Hadoop and also WritableUtils. > > Josh Patterson > Cloudera > > > >> Thanks. >> Dennis >> >> > > > > =0A=0A=0A --0-249652734-1281546761=:84210-- From general-return-1931-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 11 20:57:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40223 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 20:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 20:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 47163 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 20:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47092 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 20:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47084 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 20:57:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:57:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:57:03 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7BKuGiT071358 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=2Q3cFU+FhWZ8HQkuXq0R5rc3oxnqAQ+eaOYzRLN2iCGlCrJzOplIjuvwJhQw4y8P Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.136]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:56:17 -0700 From: "Sanjay X. Jain" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:56:15 -0700 Subject: A log4jconfig.xml file Thread-Topic: A log4jconfig.xml file Thread-Index: Acs5l6MiKam7gyep+Ue6uWfWtUOLZg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C8885C7F2D99sanjayjayahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C8885C7F2D99sanjayjayahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a log4jconfig.xml file that is loaded in my hadoop job code as: DOMC= onfigurator.configure("log4jconfig.xml"); How should I pass this file to the job (and its mapper and reducer)? I have= tried to include it in CLASSPATH env variable, and by including the file i= n job's jar file, both don't seem to work. Purpose: want to control what is logged where in my hadoop job's classes/pa= ckages. Any clues will be really helpful. Thx! Sanjay --_000_C8885C7F2D99sanjayjayahooinccom_-- From general-return-1932-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 12 00:58:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36195 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 00:58:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 00:58:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 99677 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 00:58:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99599 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 00:58:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99591 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2010 00:58:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:58:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:57:53 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7C0vKSk028999 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=YEIb73VakZqbR5zYvKpLKDIZndKjImJRoADv3RkAw74i0VfFGmnMtImTX46qbi5c Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.136]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:57:20 -0700 From: "Sanjay X. Jain" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:57:19 -0700 Subject: Re: A log4jconfig.xml file Thread-Topic: A log4jconfig.xml file Thread-Index: Acs5l6MiKam7gyep+Ue6uWfWtUOLZgAIa05m Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C88894FF2DACsanjayjayahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C88894FF2DACsanjayjayahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Probably a better question is: In a hadoop job, how can I load my own log4j= .properties file instead of the default one? Thx! On 8/11/10 1:56 PM, "Sanjay Jain" wrote: I have a log4jconfig.xml file that is loaded in my hadoop job code as: DOMC= onfigurator.configure("log4jconfig.xml"); How should I pass this file to the job (and its mapper and reducer)? I have= tried to include it in CLASSPATH env variable, and by including the file i= n job's jar file, both don't seem to work. Purpose: want to control what is logged where in my hadoop job's classes/pa= ckages. Any clues will be really helpful. Thx! Sanjay --_000_C88894FF2DACsanjayjayahooinccom_-- From general-return-1933-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 12 04:23:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94418 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 04:23:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 04:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 15301 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 04:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14821 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 04:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14811 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2010 04:23:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:23:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [96.236.214.3] (HELO dugos.com) (96.236.214.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:23:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 18836 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 04:23:21 -0000 Received: from beast.dugos.com (HELO macpro.dugos.com) (96.236.214.4) by dugos.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 04:23:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Listing Hadoop Job History Statistics From: Doug Balog In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:23:21 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) I don't know if this is the best way, but this is how I do it. Configuration conf =3D new Configuration(); JobClient jobClient =3D new JobClient(new = InetSocketAddress("jobTracker",9001),conf); jobClient.setConf(conf); // Bug in constructor, doesn't set conf. for(JobStatus js: jobClient.getAllJobs()){ // We only care about completed jobs. if(!js.isJobComplete()){ continue; }=20 // Do stuff on jobStatus. : : } You can also scrape info from http://jobtracker:50030/jobhistory.jsp Or read it from the job's outputDir/_log/ directory. Cheers, Doug On Aug 11, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Scott Whitecross wrote: > Hi - >=20 > What's the best way to list and query information on Hadoop job = histories? > For example, I'd like to see the job names from the past week against = a > Hadoop cluster I'm using. I don't see an API call or a way through = the > command line to pull the information. Is the best way writing a quick > script to process the job history files? >=20 > Thanks. > Scott From general-return-1934-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 12 04:53:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1092 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 04:53:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 04:53:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26644 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 04:53:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25849 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 04:53:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25827 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2010 04:53:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:53:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:53:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.72.168.227]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7C4qNqH085193; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0F9D3E90-4F42-4DFC-B48A-F61A6B476F42@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Listing Hadoop Job History Statistics Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:52:24 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Moving to mapreduce-user@, bcc general@. There isn't a direct way. One possible option is just use the per-job job-history file which is on HDFS (See http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Job+Submission+and+Monitoring for info on job-history). Hope that helps. Arun On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Scott Whitecross wrote: > Hi - > > What's the best way to list and query information on Hadoop job > histories? > For example, I'd like to see the job names from the past week > against a > Hadoop cluster I'm using. I don't see an API call or a way through > the > command line to pull the information. Is the best way writing a quick > script to process the job history files? > > Thanks. > Scott From general-return-1935-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 12 11:43:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56951 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2010 11:43:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 11:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 1323 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 11:43:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 939 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2010 11:43:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 931 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2010 11:43:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:43:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:42:59 +0000 Received: from [10.66.72.163] (sightbusy-lx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.72.163]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7CBfscT062606; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VUNErwOK20ZIRwCLYfMf6/WYEHEgLxR/ZpB8ndjqTZMQy5q9+18LkwLyz/Fw6pr8 Message-ID: <4C63DE01.8080303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:11:53 +0530 From: Vinod KV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "Sanjay X. Jain" Subject: Re: A log4jconfig.xml file References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The earlier question is easier to answer given you are loading the file yourselves :) You have multiple solutions: (1) Put it in the lib folder inside the job.jar. It should be automatically available from the task's classpath. (2) Set it in distributed cache as a classpath file. See DistributedCache.addCacheFile(URI uri, Configuration conf). +vinod On Thursday 12 August 2010 06:27 AM, Sanjay X. Jain wrote: > Probably a better question is: In a hadoop job, how can I load my own log4j.properties file instead of the default one? > > Thx! > > > On 8/11/10 1:56 PM, "Sanjay Jain" wrote: > > I have a log4jconfig.xml file that is loaded in my hadoop job code as: DOMConfigurator.configure("log4jconfig.xml"); > How should I pass this file to the job (and its mapper and reducer)? I have tried to include it in CLASSPATH env variable, and by including the file in job's jar file, both don't seem to work. > Purpose: want to control what is logged where in my hadoop job's classes/packages. > > Any clues will be really helpful. > > Thx! > Sanjay > > > From general-return-1936-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 13 22:18:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21606 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2010 22:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 10713 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10442 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7574 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2010 15:49:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of oded.rotem.hd@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid; bh=wacNFlEhLyqSbJwAhiucVYmgj8KjGNmnvjErsv3Ifow=; b=X5SLfDXlGxG80ziU3sJiBj8ESoxskcqcceumezh4kibBFrfL4BI3WNZBtI2fiPTTR5 sMtog2IbKgISkXlzdE7KFjQ6XEXz2qm95zrbCbLapzxRweJsDTq+yGPl7mFRRZSYlL8s 824jZODvB3POFVb0x7uEk0cWJe2KG+QmrsI/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language:x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid; b=B1Pz0i0PCgPelDk2/F9LU2lD1yuDtn5AWUe16AVpJYmbpaqKapB5bGigdtjo1rMjx4 cXFJQOKfOHN+EjmbHF4o6rPgKsbQm5cv/Rf5N61IMb6pn441y7MS0z/zH6tzMGBxwkcX XPc+VXQ7qs0FBiq3ndKOCsyGHjXR6GX/NVw3c= From: "Oded Rotem" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Session analysis using Hadoop Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:51:03 +0300 Message-ID: <4c5ed1e7.1207e30a.3749.ffff8be0@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acs2YCVYTkkJnNi2TjSzpobMLjsqRAAsNbwQ Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: Auj2 AvwA CMRB C2DL DRGY Ecbq FG6d FxD2 Hk+d H+dG INia IsGL JxJS J7T+ KfOT MPXS;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{2D2ACB07-0761-4F97-8448-E8508979BD30};bwBkAGUAZAAuAHIAbwB0AGUAbQAuAGgAZABAAGcAbQBhAGkAbAAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:51:00 GMT;UwBlAHMAcwBpAG8AbgAgAGEAbgBhAGwAeQBzAGkAcwAgAHUAcwBpAG4AZwAgAEgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAA== x-cr-puzzleid: {2D2ACB07-0761-4F97-8448-E8508979BD30} Hi, Does anyone have any experience using Hadoop to do sessionizing / session analysis? I know eBay has something called MQL (Mobius Query Language) for this, but they have not (yet?...) made it open source. Any useful pointers here would be appreciated. Cheers, Oded From general-return-1937-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 13 22:18:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21715 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2010 22:18:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 11693 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11606 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 22:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9467 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2010 18:49:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:47:53 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Message-ID: <20100809184752.GA94111@goodenter-lm.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on combining the committer roles in one (as Doug has mentioned elsewhere, all three are feel like a single project and are released as such, therefore it doesn't make much sense to split committers). In effect, MR testing that pulls in "external" HDFS dependencies works as a poor-man integration testi= ng. -1 on combining the projects back together. While having them separated mig= ht cause an extra maintenance burden, the same separation forces more clean design decisions.=20 Cos On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:02PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Hadoop developers tend to specialize in either HDFS or MapReduce, but > given that: >=20 > 0) Granting karma to Common is routine for a committer in either > space; there are no Common-only committers > 1) The majority of committers have been grandfathered into committer > roles in all three projects > 2) Many patches to Common require corresponding commits to both HDFS > and MapReduce > 3) Review-then-commit is usually sufficient notice for interested > parties to comment > 4) There have been few problems with committers pushing in patches > without consulting someone more directly involved > 5) Everyone on the PMC gets commit rights to all subprojects, anyway >=20 > Perhaps it would make sense to give up on separate committer roles > until the projects are separate TLPs. >=20 > On the other hand: >=20 > 0) Nobody has been independently added to both HDFS and MapReduce > since the projects were separated > 1) It could exacerbate the focus on MapReduce in HDFS, at the expense > of other projects (like HBase). > 2) HDFS and MapReduce are mostly independent communities and > codebases; expertise in one does not imply fluency in the other > 3) Granting veto power across projects can lead to deadlock despite > consensus within that community > 4) TLP status for either project may require untangling HDFS/MR roles > that could be distinguished now >=20 > Personally, I'm in favor of combining the roles. I trust all six of > the committers made since the project split no less than those made > earlier. Further, version control is sufficient for recovering from > most, foreseeable issues. I have some concerns about "harmless" > commits pushed through without an audit by the subproject's > maintainers (a few in recent memory caused downtime in Y! clusters), > but combining the roles seems like a worthwhile experiment. >=20 > Thoughts? -C --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkxgTVgACgkQMqXifkwDoaEHNAD/bPBu1ElJJ537qf3UGKm3gOV6 sINlS+OC3O2fh/KizsQA/i3l6ltDfowz9iPbBW2/2VWu/dNaZu53px4oS9jEmqPH =z2/s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- From general-return-1938-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 14 01:53:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97190 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2010 01:53:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2010 01:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 38638 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 01:53:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38561 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 01:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38553 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2010 01:53:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:53:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:53:41 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so4454885wwb.29 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:53:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MtKOY+V7uZOLBNJZEIKl3zmkQnJAJLfvgxOi+52jYnY=; b=b2NAfpsXUtaVGxm8ELQk1qYTca8nPRuGMi3i90+mYJyoOfO9kR9QwsAgkretlw3sXc AULqg4jlZEFHMFKbLy9mEMv43CNnIvHJEFwxVznR0iSwbwQATy3wrtKpBRuKi4teixDF hdyHW/vCFHxD6rr+powUr+qa0WCsxkAeiw3WE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hGMSYbsE9xAsUoP0tjP0ffdcGXIMfYrhmHVA7+J3ncxm78hcbRP+k1aLWojDWjaCSA bzGWmYGOoq75ce4Qrly8mREFQ7QYzgn94qZMM0rqLfWCyB5R2D/DQwpyJ53bxM+GBDE3 lc/MR2I6U9xwM9/iNt8snwvg/k49ZITNWxZzg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.83 with SMTP id a61mr1953090wem.47.1281750799970; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.135.129 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:53:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100809184752.GA94111@goodenter-lm.local> References: <20100809184752.GA94111@goodenter-lm.local> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:53:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65aeed61f7236048dbedd22 --0016e65aeed61f7236048dbedd22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 on combining committers list for common + hdfs + mapreduce. It is mostly the same set of users who contribute to all three projects. thanks, dhruba On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > +1 on combining the committer roles in one (as Doug has mentioned > elsewhere, > all three are feel like a single project and are released as such, > therefore > it doesn't make much sense to split committers). In effect, MR testing that > pulls in "external" HDFS dependencies works as a poor-man integration > testing. > > -1 on combining the projects back together. While having them separated > might > cause an extra maintenance burden, the same separation forces more clean > design decisions. > > Cos > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:02PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > Hadoop developers tend to specialize in either HDFS or MapReduce, but > > given that: > > > > 0) Granting karma to Common is routine for a committer in either > > space; there are no Common-only committers > > 1) The majority of committers have been grandfathered into committer > > roles in all three projects > > 2) Many patches to Common require corresponding commits to both HDFS > > and MapReduce > > 3) Review-then-commit is usually sufficient notice for interested > > parties to comment > > 4) There have been few problems with committers pushing in patches > > without consulting someone more directly involved > > 5) Everyone on the PMC gets commit rights to all subprojects, anyway > > > > Perhaps it would make sense to give up on separate committer roles > > until the projects are separate TLPs. > > > > On the other hand: > > > > 0) Nobody has been independently added to both HDFS and MapReduce > > since the projects were separated > > 1) It could exacerbate the focus on MapReduce in HDFS, at the expense > > of other projects (like HBase). > > 2) HDFS and MapReduce are mostly independent communities and > > codebases; expertise in one does not imply fluency in the other > > 3) Granting veto power across projects can lead to deadlock despite > > consensus within that community > > 4) TLP status for either project may require untangling HDFS/MR roles > > that could be distinguished now > > > > Personally, I'm in favor of combining the roles. I trust all six of > > the committers made since the project split no less than those made > > earlier. Further, version control is sufficient for recovering from > > most, foreseeable issues. I have some concerns about "harmless" > > commits pushed through without an audit by the subproject's > > maintainers (a few in recent memory caused downtime in Y! clusters), > > but combining the roles seems like a worthwhile experiment. > > > > Thoughts? -C > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0016e65aeed61f7236048dbedd22-- From general-return-1939-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 14 02:41:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6266 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2010 02:41:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2010 02:41:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 52028 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 02:41:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51771 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 02:41:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51763 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2010 02:41:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:41:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:41:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 6239 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2010 02:41:20 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:41:20 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1747313gxk.35 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:41:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.157.207 with SMTP id c15mr2242117ibx.143.1281753679003; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.141.11 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:41:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C62369D.6000703@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> <4C62369D.6000703@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:41:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Vinod KV wrote: > > I know of very few to nearly zero number of patches in mapreduce that touch > HDFS also. And vice versa. The common case is of patches that touch both > common and mapreduce or common and hdfs. This is a good point, though changes in Common and HDFS interfaces do break MapReduce, particularly unit tests that take liberties with interface visibility. It would be convenient if HDFS committers could push in the fix with the original issue, to shrink the window where MR is broken, but in practice such changes are usually committed in short order. After all, most committers have commit access to all three projects... though this is one of the reasons why the constraint difficult to justify. > I am one of those who has access to > mapreduce project but not to common project and find more than 50% of the > patches that fall into this category. This *was* an oversight that should be corrected either through this vote or independently. > As for the separation of the repositories, I personally felt separation of > mapreduce from hdfs helped focusing on things a lot better. The last gasp > work done for 0.21, mostly by Tom, did help a lot in decoupling the > projects. Common is the hot point, sure, but as others noted, that is a > separate discussion. +1 ---- The discussion appears to be dying down. Quick summary of comments so far: * That all HDFS and MapReduce committers should have commit rights to Common appears to be undisputed. * The value of splitting the projects at all is disputed. Some have argued that it has complicated work without delivering the benefits to developers it promised, though others have experienced this as discipline rather than inconvenience. Most of these complaints reference patches that touch Common, particularly actively-developed packages like fs. The vote concerns a narrower question than the project split, though it's fair to assert a lack of unanimity on the premise of a split Hadoop, let alone the more limited question of whether to retain a split list of committers. * Not everyone agrees that combining HDFS and MapReduce committers is sound. While there is sufficient overlap today to branch all three together, patch releases could- and likely will- be cut independently. Not everyone thinks the two projects are developing independent communities, but none have difficulty imagining TLP status for both. Please feel free to amend this if I left out an important point. ----- I think we're ready to vote. Though we have no bylaws to amend, this would be a modification to them, I guess. The last-proposed set required a 2/3 majority of the PMC, IIRC. Since adding a committer requires consensus on the PMC, it's probably fair to require a 2/3 majority to cross-pollenate lists instead of a simple majority. Though the vote could be conducted on a huge cross-post to mapreduce-dev@, hdfs-dev@ and common-dev@, it'll be easier to count if it's run on general@; I'll start it here on Monday if nobody minds. -C From general-return-1940-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 14 08:26:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17826 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2010 08:26:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2010 08:26:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 53621 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 08:26:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53351 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 08:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53343 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2010 08:26:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:26:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.209.230.50] (HELO n6e.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (203.209.230.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:26:36 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.36] by n6.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 08:26:13 -0000 Received: from [202.165.102.48] by t1.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 08:26:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp102.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 08:26:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 961170.98851.bm@omp102.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 20530 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2010 08:26:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281774372; bh=d86D/SKXktLWwMhYs11CTX9A9mVXAxzEqocLDe7EqmQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QOc2f1I9HgFMLwsZb9chJqElTWdcGp+fDoJPlRcCOOMaiv0fWwVLAE25ueTddVG9+tJai513k6PQBaZH6XhIXQmHXIPUgoYqYR3vCQRx/9Q/StRPU+OF+KirH3XIz/HSfEnSE/TMLpO2qMCl4VBPBPzABu6ClaWDbm/j614z3t0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VDNfS8qgFnjc1AQ4crkFm3y/qi74zXcJA7D1KWudkRV/4jTKsn1G1H6UobkPUoeh/hBBoW5c6nux4ooQuE3slOXwWJgzrXsiMkX3bSofDYFhvZJJEskTpS2t8O0+Yo47xRQWs06yIK0rkRWLeY1upsuujKFVtMQI49Z3+iVcGpo=; Message-ID: <768926.9887.qm@web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: B0WHZcAVM1ntQBXGA2Y1lEIyCE3uatoCry4WmKBOE_E0cvm Eel2eTgd.1wAkvYJRfZsBFQPNXu9y984BX0DbVKoVLo7z3HlSdhFz59Uc.uA OFPQ0_VQMDEV1stkQeWQemy04vAmOB_Fz7I7N4oLixZjXYBNPo4KR5m5SKnx u2aTKuTLgxvGkL9M6Kx2RvrsQPRfoUYDJbwv_iAodbsDFlexmfzdpDfX6Fv4 fM8z07TIxrZk3s0pkiQMa1JYf0LIuyEZFU4Y2YMSomg-- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:26:12 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:26:12 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: Sort Input To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1923413541-1281774372=:9887" --0-1923413541-1281774372=:9887 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, there, There is a "Sort" example in hadoop-0.20.2 release. Can someone give an example of the "SequenceFile" example? Thanks, Dennis --0-1923413541-1281774372=:9887-- From general-return-1941-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 14 10:18:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45556 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2010 10:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2010 10:18:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 91895 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 10:18:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91428 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2010 10:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91420 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2010 10:18:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:18:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.43.216.212] (HELO n2b.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com) (202.43.216.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:18:17 +0000 Received: from [202.43.217.37] by n2.bullet.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 10:17:51 -0000 Received: from [203.209.230.76] by t2.bullet.cnmail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 10:17:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp105.mail.cnb.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2010 10:17:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 451237.43276.bm@omp105.mail.cnb.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 89896 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2010 10:17:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1281781071; bh=Oaw8fs8yPkCHh8SZ+gxGO5oE4YWgTudlMKeMRHHG0yM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eF8EcS0sEI/dQXdQjyDlKMVJlCfZo25cMNwZyFFQjCE5x/TATS4pdOZXqjOm7HMco/ZnKIcrXArhb5cSUYIbs1XZ6iHFmFsvuLSICypfcE4dozNrzA1XS81G6ytkX91y+Inj0IxNKxedGjsBI16BxP2ITfJURYeyD54xvY1HlYs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vhsQIt5ptZlsJAPERW9J5Gxua7Bp79LBSiHJ3jbGcOp3bPzDSqN24n+q72ODRJMHDyD8LBJ+rBUg46TIvwqWeLoSrDHxF0UeEz8V/Xu8XBg7/+krTnaNB8eXUEY3shBEZIyWPq4rQzZPyEuQur4P2QYYNPFk1HzOWjfGqx3R7+8=; Message-ID: <305491.89880.qm@web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: egEQcUEVM1lfy.E_naywkLvwD1anZFKi4ueXpNxzFTpaq0K KV4LjlfXN0Eb7MH51YHrJLeYy8QWCCwaXA1m629Ru17XlAdRhOwrKJGHPfHF F1o6MjUuqUK_mh.nAiSJanLKSEDsMjmxmIh5UkEPNmYdCAdTfea02mbrTXED TiHOJVtEJOAgbo4mQ10iCCpWqbkLhIoiA8KxMyD2Z8YMjgtiGqDZzwD.Jvpn z7A3p9hvWAKwyalErD9RH.dzllw6WM1yr.mL2z5a3xLnXbAL92UJCyrBkZKc AYvltV5YIJdshShk- Received: from [202.118.67.200] by web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:17:50 CST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:17:50 +0800 (CST) From: Dennis Subject: Re: Sort Input To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <768926.9887.qm@web15202.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1871874496-1281781070=:89880" --0-1871874496-1281781070=:89880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just figured that out. The "org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile" class. --- On Sat, 8/14/10, Dennis wrote: From: Dennis Subject: Sort Input To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Saturday, August 14, 2010, 4:26 PM Hi, there,=20 There is a "Sort" example in hadoop-0.20.2 release. Can someone give an exa= mple of the "SequenceFile" example? Thanks, Dennis =A0 =A0 =A0 =0A=0A=0A --0-1871874496-1281781070=:89880-- From general-return-1942-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 03:37:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47919 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 03:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 03:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24234 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:37:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23824 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23816 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 03:37:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:37:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:37:36 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5734006wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:37:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CzVIJIl4biK+DgDVpKHJ8rR7gDNDY6oJzUucaURMvPs=; b=gLp/qOjOhLQ9N5ITTCefLYyVtlonJQuI/o0om//h/KCfXA/1Yhd64KvKbpHk7i5m4e yHylvDOtDh1rtwmlYL3z/FT/20Mx4d/wBE8PQbz/bj6Wi/8VX6Gl1CMIBnkK/upNnqgf br8PkARTrii1AUsNHl6Iw4k2jQsma2KgtF7UM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nqDAg9gwzjvIc6wH5N7s+NeBFw278BR+FSe8XUFG7WcHFsNB4nn8OwK19UR+BKoJLf MIfpQwgg90FY2cQVJqQaVcZZz0xqjgIXHmO8Sv/PpWuIr8YuBZ6TMuzFQAI/cMW+BskY QsGF0+fAJsuP/8E8NhkKJJHIo4Brr87zauGM8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.178.200 with SMTP id f50mr2978251wem.62.1281843436067; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:37:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fabb1aa1b6d048dd46e79 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367fabb1aa1b6d048dd46e79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi! I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I want to do two things: 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example applications hadoop provides 2. Write an application on my own Those two things bring me following questions: a. debugger? I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if there is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, experienced experts, do? :) b. Where to run hadoop? Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on VM -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If my ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be better if I directly run it on linux? c. Single-node or multi-node? In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! Best, Rita :) P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let me apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) --0016367fabb1aa1b6d048dd46e79-- From general-return-1943-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 03:50:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49009 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 03:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 03:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 30714 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30561 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30553 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 03:49:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:49:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of thinke365@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:49:50 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5741951wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:49:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QkRD85raJYRUQ/rkLIRKESjB5usvrm6gqYr+F/aePgY=; b=uBywzI2DulDRFw1ldQyp/ymTzOe59M0Vedm1JPbL0di2SxkidM8V6b4f2N/MJAbZ35 uakgBN9VqbaYJSolkqCIzxWj4UaWupL9YjTtRo8jIIOtLovXb8jfY0f79NY87hvgSi/+ 25IFfjkNCFKNLPeraNlyP8UQxV0kuhohrYr0s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Cp7ISrzehndkSRLxTPuCNiQ56M2WDiF9fUraFzj31aUvX/3pAfXPE/AUGKMKIv0Qkx QFavPNyWsZfLskYrvMw4u+YoWEtBSqUfa30nbRV2llgvA5AnZudGJDzY89TJdQhIKXV+ dkRPVXVoqvcsVXI5yvlq3Pc71DetQYGXygNvk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.54.73 with SMTP id h51mr1156998wec.100.1281844170272; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.234.7 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:49:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:49:30 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: smith jack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org There is still a long way to go before you start debuging hadoop, the first point is that, you should run hadoop first! how to make this done. simple run bin/start-all, then hadoop can response to your request. you can use FsShell when you begin. hope you will enjoy it 2010/8/15 Rita Liu : > Hi! > > I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already > downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I want > to do two things: > > 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example applications > hadoop provides > 2. Write an application on my own > > Those two things bring me following questions: > > a. debugger? > I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace > through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if there > is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for > hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or > just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > experienced experts, do? :) > > b. Where to run hadoop? > Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on VM > -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If my > ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be > better if I directly run it on linux? > > c. Single-node or multi-node? > In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more > machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > > As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will be > greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > > Best, > Rita :) > > P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let me > apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? > Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > From general-return-1944-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 03:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49198 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 03:54:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 03:54:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 32253 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:54:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31895 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 03:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31887 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 03:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:54:37 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5744820wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:54:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FGT8EvZA/IUqf0n/vSBjAKohTepBm86rcng0h7r1Lwc=; b=czM+3sFfdYBGr64WeOgTcnhgETtogGgTqjK644vbmELP2RiV4THT9yW8h5bpuLbwrT zo3nRbmRsqTdcS750Vuwa+LXhbW/Nce/IwoXSGRFNHXzNkWdYK3lwlCVVxzlHS9X6D+K VXQJmWp9fuLNsMK0uSwnUx4gIYsR4ONap+7LM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tw1gBN4VKHSCqOjDNTsha7x1BGAgvBxKx7ZmAL6wA5ONQmM77ecH9HgSyPLG4laN7m YQ99WsXnn7S0qJSF8CoaBmbP4S1ulORKzLquxxmFWxnW+wTXDtYHNG3VczM5rFjF5uhw lHehS7qtdXTjdJd/vD3Dfclz5An5wnA4cJdzk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.74.82 with SMTP id w60mr1163728wed.106.1281844455461; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:54:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:54:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c8a46cd226048dd4ab4d --00504502c8a46cd226048dd4ab4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks so much! I did do that, and now I want to move to the next step. If possible, may I know more to move on? Thank you very much! -Rita :) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:49 PM, smith jack wrote: > There is still a long way to go before you start debuging hadoop, > the first point is that, you should run hadoop first! > how to make this done. > simple run bin/start-all, then hadoop can response to your request. > you can use FsShell when you begin. > hope you will enjoy it > > 2010/8/15 Rita Liu : > > Hi! > > > > I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already > > downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I > want > > to do two things: > > > > 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example > applications > > hadoop provides > > 2. Write an application on my own > > > > Those two things bring me following questions: > > > > a. debugger? > > I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace > > through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if > there > > is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for > > hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or > > just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > > experienced experts, do? :) > > > > b. Where to run hadoop? > > Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on > VM > > -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > > mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If > my > > ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be > > better if I directly run it on linux? > > > > c. Single-node or multi-node? > > In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > > single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more > > machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > > > > As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > > questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will > be > > greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > > > > Best, > > Rita :) > > > > P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let > me > > apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? > > Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > > > --00504502c8a46cd226048dd4ab4d-- From general-return-1945-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 04:42:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62291 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 04:42:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 04:42:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 42886 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 04:42:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42568 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 04:42:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42560 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 04:42:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of piyushgarg80@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:42:47 +0000 Received: by pxi3 with SMTP id 3so1985679pxi.35 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:42:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=2PHLa/TiIOVD3ORKM81PQoALH7Mhc2huMcBIl6Gh6Xg=; b=eXXB8uBe0RCvxfVBkFAzb97oqEAxrccPSXzkqhThzbQ57Dg9343pujxxKPTPMwdQZA 2dgQL0yoIccZ50p+Exl2FJF1Mk3l7e10ktHiNwPTx3+DhAgXCqeLMc56fyNT8nFZ0o28 lrxf2kmEVgMdkhUZQ6sipeS93Ui1smuk0TwYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=Q0zCCxUnuMqfxe5RBY9fk2wEHAjFz+NHSafXzuTa43zeDe/1+uIJlFbhYH7/0g6Zj+ JzFwpUkzJFrGZG/si9bgTwLznK5l/A7P8cynR1mjkEo0tpkuEw4NobW7G36z85QCt5+s 2Wng3ODZp3+q81Sz9qMBWbx1RVsCrdMsV7pmA= Received: by 10.114.175.14 with SMTP id x14mr4171406wae.152.1281847347226; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([115.99.74.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d38sm8752862wam.20.2010.08.14.21.42.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:12:16 +0530 From: Piyush Garg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop basics References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060201020506090909060301" --------------060201020506090909060301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rita, I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way to go. I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. Hadoop Tutorial - YDN excellent beginners tutorial and well organized. Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) The tutorial on the hadoop wiki is too much for a beginner. Debugger: I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very difficult to debug its apps. The only way to debug is to use traces. I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice session you can use single node setup. Lets see what the experts say. Thanks and Regards Piyush Garg On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > Hi! > > I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already > downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I want > to do two things: > > 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example applications > hadoop provides > 2. Write an application on my own > > Those two things bring me following questions: > > a. debugger? > I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace > through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if there > is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for > hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or > just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > experienced experts, do? :) > > b. Where to run hadoop? > Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on VM > -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If my > ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be > better if I directly run it on linux? > > c. Single-node or multi-node? > In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more > machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > > As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will be > greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > > Best, > Rita :) > > P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let me > apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? > Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > > --------------060201020506090909060301-- From general-return-1946-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 04:50:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62683 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 04:50:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 04:50:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 44140 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 04:50:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43978 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 04:50:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43970 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 04:50:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:50:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 04:50:28 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so6002092wyb.35 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:50:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MEkS1oaDT/G7TZ66u2RRt9bvKeKC3tHHz9bbQ0M4VE4=; b=TYZjm5IBr0h/dfXNSqpvCp4XcX30ySOhKnJXgyCn/uKlSIWuk/CfOJJfhpC+gfGug1 Yp8mDkAY4sr17I5eIX5SlOOrE+o7pNNrGCmoNcKng3R0Da84H4e/9Hpd1VEYAGMehv1y islagL9G7H39uwqZUe00buDCJgoKD9rG7tDIM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=g+0LIqljPqsOAYhs0YZMobg3XoPjXr1uE+czR5z5XBmrgRdXHOrpy+rwH9bThDSTnT p4lQlXqirCNLF6T/zOuSYAsi7/X1/BrNiBcFrfrXrAbr1StF5rZS1+yVU6RfPxe+A43z j0w2mt8x/5aTblKivzv0u7vBWI/oz09U5dNtE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.12.8 with SMTP id 8mr1184846wey.107.1281847807546; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:50:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:50:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1e00399609048dd573bf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64c1e00399609048dd573bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use "traces"? And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) Thanks a lot, -Rita :)) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg wrote: > Hi Rita, > > I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way > to go. > I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. > > Hadoop Tutorial - YDN > excellent > beginners tutorial and well organized. > Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll > < > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 > > > Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) > < > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 > > > The tutorial on the hadoop wiki > is > too much for a beginner. > > Debugger: > I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This > is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very > difficult to debug its apps. > The only way to debug is to use traces. > > I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice > session you can use single node setup. > > Lets see what the experts say. > > Thanks and Regards > Piyush Garg > > > On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already > > downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I > want > > to do two things: > > > > 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example > applications > > hadoop provides > > 2. Write an application on my own > > > > Those two things bring me following questions: > > > > a. debugger? > > I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace > > through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if > there > > is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for > > hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or > > just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > > experienced experts, do? :) > > > > b. Where to run hadoop? > > Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on > VM > > -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > > mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If > my > > ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be > > better if I directly run it on linux? > > > > c. Single-node or multi-node? > > In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > > single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more > > machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > > > > As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > > questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will > be > > greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > > > > Best, > > Rita :) > > > > P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let > me > > apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? > > Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > > > > > --0016e64c1e00399609048dd573bf-- From general-return-1947-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68742 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 46938 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46800 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46792 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:06:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:06:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of piyushgarg80@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:06:01 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so996203pwj.35 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=yIx5+WAJZMrJ6HEoXwHGu0w8S5PzMNeUzR+FWk5qIvE=; b=qUIANDasyi290dFzq2FjxiZWZyvh55PVmqJxYQruxrWwtUErx+YmuAj7AkBs6A5aSi 6/MEQxkD8pD5eBpgG/JK0h7YZA+ZpWA+22sF/H7TQhBkwWxl1tjwNFCZ4pqBd+1fVMDV hfz0rLJHMD3VhVvrMRd2FdRNrkhh1MI6ZQoXA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=uznYU18ZCOQTh++Oz+kGVx9IwGMJylmCu3rvNAXHLNmj8jUnuy5gj5YAxBLLqsItWP BeWmezJfdEBDYlgvBxkNx5y9O5CqHJvO1zGuqYUOdvnS8QG/EVRW2iIupTrvnyh0oFRw 2nPkMYX0rpEQOb039o+hOwsD2gfezgzla+NQk= Received: by 10.114.61.8 with SMTP id j8mr4165074waa.228.1281848739270; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([115.99.74.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q6sm8803568waj.10.2010.08.14.22.05.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:34:59 +0530 From: Piyush Garg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop basics References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070308090400000409070802" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070308090400000409070802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rita, You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs directory. Thanks and Regards Piyush Garg On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use "traces"? > > And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) > > Thanks a lot, > -Rita :)) > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg wrote: > > >> Hi Rita, >> >> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way >> to go. >> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >> >> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >> excellent >> beginners tutorial and well organized. >> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll >> < >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 >> >>> >> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >> < >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 >> >>> >> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >> is >> too much for a beginner. >> >> Debugger: >> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This >> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very >> difficult to debug its apps. >> The only way to debug is to use traces. >> >> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice >> session you can use single node setup. >> >> Lets see what the experts say. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Piyush Garg >> >> >> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already >>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I >>> >> want >> >>> to do two things: >>> >>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >>> >> applications >> >>> hadoop provides >>> 2. Write an application on my own >>> >>> Those two things bring me following questions: >>> >>> a. debugger? >>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace >>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if >>> >> there >> >>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for >>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or >>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >>> experienced experts, do? :) >>> >>> b. Where to run hadoop? >>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on >>> >> VM >> >>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing >>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If >>> >> my >> >>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be >>> better if I directly run it on linux? >>> >>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more >>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? >>> >>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will >>> >> be >> >>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >>> >>> Best, >>> Rita :) >>> >>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let >>> >> me >> >>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? >>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >>> >>> >>> >> > --------------070308090400000409070802-- From general-return-1948-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:09:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69511 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:09:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:09:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 49092 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:09:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48923 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48915 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:09:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:09:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thinke365@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:09:28 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5793614wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:09:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WbUwiXzpuUOH8vVp44SpPue0Z5AItaa69ApvwIcjFdI=; b=oT9bG9fHPf9bfMc9JU6pxGTIyhF//NU9vhky3gd/hFH+4bGvw0QfwSmAd7dtcppOuE YMlfS61+3YaKGckdnhFkJmtMIAPclod6vAsW/qvk3fFaAm51b2pivpIYiAAWduAL+qdd c8mqTSLGWbVyu2eHNoApiS8dqySgDJIwZ2h/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uIicOX8J2tsNvCmmgQbcxH5TvNT21d0sUSfoLAmevsQErTpD/BMAKklPruPhYAH3pp H96APxAQ3dzR1ajLrzPCKgd+Qe87gZiNMElmoxDHOznYwjR6fPSjwBoTPXyIkT/2jNKm 4RKjvpeGCA1E3/RNGYtE1DpoBSeO4RcgBG6TQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.10.145 with SMTP id 17mr3070804wev.27.1281848946224; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.234.7 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:09:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 13:09:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: smith jack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 that means you can only trace by log, and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing issues. 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg : > Hi Rita, > > You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is > part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in > hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs > directory. > > Thanks and Regards > Piyush Garg > > > On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use "traces"? >> >> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) >> >> Thanks a lot, >> -Rita :)) >> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Rita, >>> >>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way >>> to go. >>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >>> >>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >>> excellent >>> beginners tutorial and well organized. >>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll >>> < >>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 >>> >>>> >>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >>> < >>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 >>> >>>> >>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >>> is >>> too much for a beginner. >>> >>> Debugger: >>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This >>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very >>> difficult to debug its apps. >>> The only way to debug is to use traces. >>> >>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice >>> session you can use single node setup. >>> >>> Lets see what the experts say. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Piyush Garg >>> >>> >>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already >>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I >>>> >>> want >>> >>>> to do two things: >>>> >>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >>>> >>> applications >>> >>>> hadoop provides >>>> 2. Write an application on my own >>>> >>>> Those two things bring me following questions: >>>> >>>> a. debugger? >>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace >>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if >>>> >>> there >>> >>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for >>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or >>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >>>> experienced experts, do? :) >>>> >>>> b. Where to run hadoop? >>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on >>>> >>> VM >>> >>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing >>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If >>>> >>> my >>> >>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be >>>> better if I directly run it on linux? >>>> >>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more >>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? >>>> >>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will >>>> >>> be >>> >>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Rita :) >>>> >>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let >>>> >>> me >>> >>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? >>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1949-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:11:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70078 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:11:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:11:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 50408 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:11:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50208 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50200 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:11:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:11:13 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so6015391wyb.35 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:10:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=d7LmToOfPx4RdzPUV4hqka0t3sn5iAU369HADlrbVSk=; b=aH5id5+7m4mqeT5MglbMnnLjoKxYExoUxr6OjaeERMJ/r2j/gEUJrpTcWLxlYUV9nb CfqFSgqPln7NmDscIIaEo4lB4rD+1j+MQRJ58vYHtprPEBynL9VQsWDNa3f71RIhaE8V 8VsGPEsHaPLyzG5GFUyhNmyL2bQ23SkW9PFdg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eeN2/rJrY1ehOy3gbnCO894TBNLTZWbD/VXetIGSJljvL9D0Io3INF/FhJzzyOLVZm XL3/rfTsg0k8VO9awkJ7cCMT4g3AvYtyLVsGOORHfr1aAWWWPsSA6B7P8o7eA9ERGCHG TrJqVdU3PPx4+sy8uI1FxoF78ZhUAtv6hCP9s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.232.144 with SMTP id n16mr3031218weq.1.1281849052982; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:10:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:10:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758ae6c756e2a048dd5bd9e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151758ae6c756e2a048dd5bd9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you very much, Piyush! I'll do as you say :DD Thanks a lot!! Thanks Smith :) hmm ... I see. ok :) Please give me more guidance and suggestions if possible, dear experts! -Rita :)) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:09 PM, smith jack wrote: > that means you can only trace by log, > and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha > distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing issues. > > 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg : > > Hi Rita, > > > > You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is > > part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in > > hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs > > directory. > > > > Thanks and Regards > > Piyush Garg > > > > > > On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > >> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use > "traces"? > >> > >> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) > >> > >> Thanks a lot, > >> -Rita :)) > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hi Rita, > >>> > >>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way > >>> to go. > >>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. > >>> > >>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN > >>> excellent > >>> beginners tutorial and well organized. > >>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll > >>> < > >>> > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 > >>> > >>>> > >>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) > >>> < > >>> > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 > >>> > >>>> > >>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki > >>> is > >>> too much for a beginner. > >>> > >>> Debugger: > >>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This > >>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very > >>> difficult to debug its apps. > >>> The only way to debug is to use traces. > >>> > >>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice > >>> session you can use single node setup. > >>> > >>> Lets see what the experts say. > >>> > >>> Thanks and Regards > >>> Piyush Garg > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi! > >>>> > >>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've > already > >>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I > >>>> > >>> want > >>> > >>>> to do two things: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example > >>>> > >>> applications > >>> > >>>> hadoop provides > >>>> 2. Write an application on my own > >>>> > >>>> Those two things bring me following questions: > >>>> > >>>> a. debugger? > >>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace > >>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if > >>>> > >>> there > >>> > >>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for > >>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug > or > >>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > >>>> experienced experts, do? :) > >>>> > >>>> b. Where to run hadoop? > >>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or > on > >>>> > >>> VM > >>> > >>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > >>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? > If > >>>> > >>> my > >>> > >>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it > be > >>>> better if I directly run it on linux? > >>>> > >>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? > >>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > >>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more > >>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > >>>> > >>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > >>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice > will > >>>> > >>> be > >>> > >>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Rita :) > >>>> > >>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please > let > >>>> > >>> me > >>> > >>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other > mailing-lists? > >>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > --00151758ae6c756e2a048dd5bd9e-- From general-return-1950-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:15:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71267 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:15:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 51725 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51497 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51489 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:15:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:15:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:15:10 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5797598wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=K3TNgwzY4JL24uKKW073BuYW6dqIe57Sg7TQRHFgsj4=; b=CCuEC7Iqf+X7vB/QstZZ8QuP4JQVULIPe+th0Wiic5mJRmFeULJ2sm4fhxywNkK03c PD4PIZzlbRFn6c8DLGIR3yNt96qOQz2k0qeHgka96Yw63LJiQCoJpBqh7nv4qQvJh4K3 z51UKh3q6uX93lUuntAXI2XwG/8tAWryUs+ZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=mN4AkOXLk8RBxm9nNB+w8gEsmAa3FX9/+Sls+Iy8Fi+7XmU2q4X5ttxCf5xDxcQZKM K3qY4pGJ93HXkRacy6oTHzkVy61bYoJ/wRjnN6bJkThAOTq3vcVSvjxXEqjos1DOXCHY R9aRYKnBqnlSMbTiVKdUOhHZ4EdCDhD5+0Kwc= Received: by 10.216.210.206 with SMTP id u56mr1237107weo.23.1281849289124; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:14:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.197 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:14:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:44:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If you start your job in a single-node cluster with a "local" configuration (conf.set("mapred.job.tracker", "local") and conf.set("fs.default.name", "local")), you can _almost_ debug all the vital parts. I use this method (though its been deprecated) to debug my Map and Reduce functions locally. Remote debugging with multiple-nodes would still be cool to have though. On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > Thank you very much, Piyush! I'll do as you say :DD Thanks a lot!! > > Thanks Smith :) hmm ... I see. ok :) > > Please give me more guidance and suggestions if possible, dear experts! > -Rita :)) > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:09 PM, smith jack wrote: > >> that means you can only trace by log, >> and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha >> distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing issues. >> >> 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg : >> > Hi Rita, >> > >> > You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is >> > part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in >> > hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs >> > directory. >> > >> > Thanks and Regards >> > Piyush Garg >> > >> > >> > On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> >> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use >> "traces"? >> >> >> >> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> -Rita :)) >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi Rita, >> >>> >> >>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way >> >>> to go. >> >>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >> >>> >> >>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >> >>> excellent >> >>> beginners tutorial and well organized. >> >>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll >> >>> < >> >>> >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >> >>> < >> >>> >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >> >>> is >> >>> too much for a beginner. >> >>> >> >>> Debugger: >> >>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This >> >>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very >> >>> difficult to debug its apps. >> >>> The only way to debug is to use traces. >> >>> >> >>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice >> >>> session you can use single node setup. >> >>> >> >>> Lets see what the experts say. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks and Regards >> >>> Piyush Garg >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi! >> >>>> >> >>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've >> already >> >>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I >> >>>> >> >>> want >> >>> >> >>>> to do two things: >> >>>> >> >>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >> >>>> >> >>> applications >> >>> >> >>>> hadoop provides >> >>>> 2. Write an application on my own >> >>>> >> >>>> Those two things bring me following questions: >> >>>> >> >>>> a. debugger? >> >>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace >> >>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if >> >>>> >> >>> there >> >>> >> >>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for >> >>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug >> or >> >>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >> >>>> experienced experts, do? :) >> >>>> >> >>>> b. Where to run hadoop? >> >>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or >> on >> >>>> >> >>> VM >> >>> >> >>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing >> >>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? >> If >> >>>> >> >>> my >> >>> >> >>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it >> be >> >>>> better if I directly run it on linux? >> >>>> >> >>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >> >>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >> >>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more >> >>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? >> >>>> >> >>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >> >>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice >> will >> >>>> >> >>> be >> >>> >> >>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >> >>>> >> >>>> Best, >> >>>> Rita :) >> >>>> >> >>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please >> let >> >>>> >> >>> me >> >>> >> >>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other >> mailing-lists? >> >>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-1951-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:23:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73244 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:23:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:23:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 56056 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55852 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55844 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:23:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:23:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of piyushgarg80@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:23:08 +0000 Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so1995985pvg.35 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=raY7cP0FYFDk9S2FNCqxO92reORPI6ZYbYiDHdBDhR0=; b=cbdW9VLrlZqLUZzOZnXR1qm/KUF1CVq5wDh56o6NdjKuVueZxCepOEEKMCU4j1QyYR MzwR7ZTAyFfUbZ+18uLQasH6LxO4MCW6HbdDYbQ0eDXsvlEu/jd7b+DlA15TwY+40rnA nNOX6dDxO7qAkz2hqz0K1VStf6oebhdCNHrVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=Xpx5b7NdgNevZMyXpmpxXqsIe1yKgvlTWne3bk2eX0JWkzu89xFgNd2Pf8nX0U7Ecu MZSwdVJGutAr2NJfH/H9o6ro823sP2Snm3j71o/j3qpN7srkLJBYAkgJZInYw1d1g62o tEA/3JyiEM4rkWRpSO1IxdCF+1QjO+1KZFX2A= Received: by 10.114.103.6 with SMTP id a6mr4189885wac.213.1281849765918; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([115.99.74.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d35sm8830884waa.21.2010.08.14.22.22.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C67798F.4010701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:52:23 +0530 From: Piyush Garg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop basics References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070201060301050706070908" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070201060301050706070908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Smith, step debugging also works in hadoop as with other java applications. export HADOOP_OPTS="-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000" 'suspend=y' is to let the jvm suspend until the remote debugger is attached. Thanks and Regards Piyush Garg On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:39 AM, smith jack wrote: > that means you can only trace by log, > and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha > distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing issues. > > 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg : > >> Hi Rita, >> >> You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is >> part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in >> hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs >> directory. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Piyush Garg >> >> >> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> >>> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use "traces"? >>> >>> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) >>> >>> Thanks a lot, >>> -Rita :)) >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Rita, >>>> >>>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long way >>>> to go. >>>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >>>> >>>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >>>> excellent >>>> beginners tutorial and well organized. >>>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll >>>> < >>>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >>>> < >>>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >>>> is >>>> too much for a beginner. >>>> >>>> Debugger: >>>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This >>>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be very >>>> difficult to debug its apps. >>>> The only way to debug is to use traces. >>>> >>>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for practice >>>> session you can use single node setup. >>>> >>>> Lets see what the experts say. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Regards >>>> Piyush Garg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've already >>>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I >>>>> >>>>> >>>> want >>>> >>>> >>>>> to do two things: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >>>>> >>>>> >>>> applications >>>> >>>> >>>>> hadoop provides >>>>> 2. Write an application on my own >>>>> >>>>> Those two things bring me following questions: >>>>> >>>>> a. debugger? >>>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to trace >>>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if >>>>> >>>>> >>>> there >>>> >>>> >>>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary for >>>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either debug or >>>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >>>>> experienced experts, do? :) >>>>> >>>>> b. Where to run hadoop? >>>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or on >>>>> >>>>> >>>> VM >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing >>>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? If >>>>> >>>>> >>>> my >>>> >>>> >>>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it be >>>>> better if I directly run it on linux? >>>>> >>>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >>>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >>>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain more >>>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? >>>>> >>>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >>>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice will >>>>> >>>>> >>>> be >>>> >>>> >>>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Rita :) >>>>> >>>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please let >>>>> >>>>> >>>> me >>>> >>>> >>>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other mailing-lists? >>>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> --------------070201060301050706070908-- From general-return-1952-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 15 05:40:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75542 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 05:40:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 05:40:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 58547 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58236 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2010 05:40:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58228 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2010 05:40:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:40:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:40:26 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so5815018wwb.29 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:40:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3xtfYNN5s+KwRTx8qbTVNgScMjJgIx5738n3HljTBQU=; b=VgYmp9n5d2LR1KGIBHGm0K0ZitmYq18M9/V03LAjn4gnMFfZhjNuRJHSF4qxNpGGfE kFzueAjqVWwqjzglYWqODtFU9qB80b/LX3JdSadIvxgU2HtE18KZall/rgiSNesXMpSI a6asO2qixNnrFj2cunu6r+7Q0Icm5svo1eY98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PQfe5zMDtoBIF+tPxCHQGybjgAsAYhj+oqIE2W/wlbMvxGOxBVNC5pNsMyti14btd9 n2vGMmRqSv9YBfhwBcDQc6N0dI3H9bE1DK7Djmq+HSmI1qWgYf8GhmVEL0gEc7kQ342F 99FjKdl1DKwRAHMfkIWbciSSRF1u+vxRTXiMw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.211 with SMTP id a61mr1249503wen.15.1281850805920; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:40:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C67798F.4010701@gmail.com> References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> <4C67798F.4010701@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:40:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c26a4f12373048dd62522 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64c26a4f12373048dd62522 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Harsh and Piyush! Thank you very much. So it seems like it would be best if I use log4j to trace, and debugging with a debugger is still possible if I set "mapred.job.tracker" to be "local" and "fs.default.name" to be "local", in hadoop-site.xml. Plus: in hadoop-env.sh, I should specify HADOOP_OPTS to be: "-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000" (why 8000? also, what does "-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket" mean?) ... in order to use a debugger. Is my understanding correct? :) If so -- then which debugger do you use? May I know? Thanks a lot! I am also going to try log4j now! Many thanks, -Rita :)) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Piyush Garg wrote: > Hi Smith, > > step debugging also works in hadoop as with other java applications. > export > > HADOOP_OPTS="-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000" > 'suspend=y' is to let the jvm suspend until the remote debugger is > attached. > > Thanks and Regards > Piyush Garg > > > On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:39 AM, smith jack wrote: > > that means you can only trace by log, > > and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha > > distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing > issues. > > > > 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg : > > > >> Hi Rita, > >> > >> You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is > >> part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in > >> hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs > >> directory. > >> > >> Thanks and Regards > >> Piyush Garg > >> > >> > >> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > >> > >>> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use > "traces"? > >>> > >>> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot, > >>> -Rita :)) > >>> > >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi Rita, > >>>> > >>>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long > way > >>>> to go. > >>>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. > >>>> > >>>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN > >>>> excellent > >>>> beginners tutorial and well organized. > >>>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll > >>>> < > >>>> > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) > >>>> < > >>>> > http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki > >>>> > is > >>>> too much for a beginner. > >>>> > >>>> Debugger: > >>>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This > >>>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be > very > >>>> difficult to debug its apps. > >>>> The only way to debug is to use traces. > >>>> > >>>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for > practice > >>>> session you can use single node setup. > >>>> > >>>> Lets see what the experts say. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks and Regards > >>>> Piyush Garg > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've > already > >>>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> want > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> to do two things: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> applications > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> hadoop provides > >>>>> 2. Write an application on my own > >>>>> > >>>>> Those two things bring me following questions: > >>>>> > >>>>> a. debugger? > >>>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to > trace > >>>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> there > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary > for > >>>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either > debug or > >>>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, > >>>>> experienced experts, do? :) > >>>>> > >>>>> b. Where to run hadoop? > >>>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or > on > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> VM > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing > >>>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? > If > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> my > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it > be > >>>>> better if I directly run it on linux? > >>>>> > >>>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? > >>>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use > >>>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain > more > >>>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? > >>>>> > >>>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) > >>>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice > will > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> be > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Rita :) > >>>>> > >>>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please > let > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> me > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other > mailing-lists? > >>>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > --0016e64c26a4f12373048dd62522-- From general-return-1953-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 06:28:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91275 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 06:28:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 06:28:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 80524 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 06:28:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80163 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 06:28:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80155 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 06:28:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:28:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of v.amit@verchaska.com designates 203.123.141.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.123.141.155] (HELO mail.verchaska.com) (203.123.141.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 06:28:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE3B11DBBD7 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:56:24 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.verchaska.com Received: from mail.verchaska.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.verchaska.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9cnoWMjAGLN4 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:56:19 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (unknown [192.168.0.186]) by mail.verchaska.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB74D11DBBD3 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:56:19 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4C68DA5E.8080504@verchaska.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:57:42 +0530 From: amit kumar verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop basics References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> <4C67798F.4010701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Rita, If you reached a place where you need to use api like hahoop, forget about the debugging the code. Your code must be syntactically and logically error free, for rest of the things logging is enough. Try log4j only. Thanks, Amit Kumar Verma Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. On 08/15/2010 11:10 AM, Rita Liu wrote: > Hi Harsh and Piyush! Thank you very much. So it seems like it would be best > if I use log4j to trace, and debugging with a debugger is still possible if > I set "mapred.job.tracker" to be "local" and "fs.default.name" to be > "local", in hadoop-site.xml. Plus: in hadoop-env.sh, I should specify > HADOOP_OPTS to be: > > "-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000" (why > 8000? also, what does "-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket" mean?) > > ... in order to use a debugger. Is my understanding correct? :) > > If so -- then which debugger do you use? May I know? Thanks a lot! I am also > going to try log4j now! > > Many thanks, > -Rita :)) > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Piyush Gargwrote: > >> Hi Smith, >> >> step debugging also works in hadoop as with other java applications. >> export >> >> HADOOP_OPTS="-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000" >> 'suspend=y' is to let the jvm suspend until the remote debugger is >> attached. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Piyush Garg >> >> >> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:39 AM, smith jack wrote: >>> that means you can only trace by log, >>> and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha >>> distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing >> issues. >>> 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg: >>> >>>> Hi Rita, >>>> >>>> You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library is >>>> part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file in >>>> hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop logs >>>> directory. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Regards >>>> Piyush Garg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use >> "traces"? >>>>> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot, >>>>> -Rita :)) >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rita, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long >> way >>>>>> to go. >>>>>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >>>>>> excellent >>>>>> beginners tutorial and well organized. >>>>>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. Noll >>>>>> < >>>>>> >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Single-Node_Cluster%29 >>>>>> >>>>>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >>>>>> < >>>>>> >> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Multi-Node_Cluster%29 >>>>>> >>>>>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >>>>>> >> is >>>>>> too much for a beginner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Debugger: >>>>>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. This >>>>>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be >> very >>>>>> difficult to debug its apps. >>>>>> The only way to debug is to use traces. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for >> practice >>>>>> session you can use single node setup. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lets see what the experts say. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>> Piyush Garg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've >> already >>>>>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. Now I >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> want >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> to do two things: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> applications >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> hadoop provides >>>>>>> 2. Write an application on my own >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those two things bring me following questions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a. debugger? >>>>>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to >> trace >>>>>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know if >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> there >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary >> for >>>>>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either >> debug or >>>>>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >>>>>>> experienced experts, do? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> b. Where to run hadoop? >>>>>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux, or >> on >>>>>>> >>>>>> VM >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writing >>>>>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it true? >> If >>>>>>> >>>>>> my >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would it >> be >>>>>>> better if I directly run it on linux? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >>>>>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >>>>>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain >> more >>>>>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nodes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >>>>>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advice >> will >>>>>>> >>>>>> be >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Rita :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, please >> let >>>>>>> >>>>>> me >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other >> mailing-lists? >>>>>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From general-return-1954-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 09:57:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69456 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 09:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 09:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 86995 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 09:57:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86563 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 09:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86536 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 09:57:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:57:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:57:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C81B7CEC for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:56:44 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mSau-uj5F9zT for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:56:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F4BB7CEB for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:56:42 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1282557390.13827@aYcqjV5Y4bvFrfI3b9dp4w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7G9uSoC026108 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C690B4C.4070906@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> <4C609FEE.1050209@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7G9uSoC026108 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/08/10 17:44, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>> I'd like to get rid of Common. It could either be merged into HDFS or >>> gradually whittled away to nothing. I'd prefer the latter. If we move >>> to different RPC and serialization systems (e.g., Avro) then Common's >>> io, and ipc packages might be removed. Configuration might be >>> replaced/merged with Jakarta Commons Configuration >>> (http://commons.apache.org/configuration/). Similarly, the metrics and >>> fs packages might be moved to Jakarta Commons. Such changes might be >>> hard to do back-compatibly, however. >> >> Great idea. We should do this. >> > > Cool, created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6909 to track. > I'm actually against this. You push all your stuff upstream -your management foundations- and you are dependent on the other stuff release schedules, and you don't have one single place to do your own layers, your own indirection. This doesn't imply anything against commons-config, just that there is benefit from having some core stuff, and it's in management that it really wins, and in shared utility stuff like in-VM httpd servers From general-return-1955-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 14:28:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13171 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 14:28:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 14:28:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63019 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 14:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62648 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 14:28:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62639 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 14:28:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:28:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:28:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.72.244.128]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7GERPN2057711 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <2958FF70-4BBC-47E4-BFB7-656CA3594637@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4C690B4C.4070906@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-104-866451547 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Combine committer lists in Common/HDFS/MapReduce Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:27:25 -0700 References: <4C5C8302.3010008@apache.org> <97E2C026-0C44-4FDC-A569-63E218E03D59@yahoo-inc.com> <4C602C27.6060802@apache.org> <4C609FEE.1050209@yahoo-inc.com> <4C690B4C.4070906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-104-866451547 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 10/08/10 17:44, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> Cool, created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6909 to >> track. >> > > I'm actually against this. You push all your stuff upstream -your > management foundations- and you are dependent on the other stuff > release > schedules, and you don't have one single place to do your own layers, > your own indirection. > > This doesn't imply anything against commons-config, just that there is > benefit from having some core stuff, and it's in management that it > really wins, and in shared utility stuff like in-VM httpd servers Agreed. Please comment on HADOOP-6909/HADOOP-6910, let us continue the discussion on jira. There are several other reasons this is infeasible including features such as support for 'final' parameters, lack of serialization etc. Arun --Apple-Mail-104-866451547-- From general-return-1956-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 21:39:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67677 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 21:39:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 21:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28945 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:39:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28847 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:39:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28837 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 21:39:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:39:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:39:24 +0000 Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v8Uf1e00817UAYkAE9f2AP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:39:02 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id v9et1e0072SbwD58Z9evt7; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:39:00 +0000 Message-Id: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:38:53 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen From general-return-1957-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 21:44:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68473 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 21:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 21:44:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 36382 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36172 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36162 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 21:44:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:44:19 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-247-101.corp.yahoo.com ([172.21.149.101]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7GLhgT9003176 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:43:42 -0700 References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or > HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases > where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal > of simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common > committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce > committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-1958-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 21:59:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71414 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 21:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 21:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 52407 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:59:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52366 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 21:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52358 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 21:59:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:59:37 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.33] (wlanvpn-snve-246-33.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.33]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7GLwvfp005681 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yvcVNMBnKBkH3rwSqbYX+KB6NdyCsKtDBLhYhGm3G68BbYgEWuUu1TqIjceCSMYW Message-ID: <4C69B4A1.7060303@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:58:57 -0700 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Jakob Arun C Murthy wrote: > +1 > > Arun > > On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or >> HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases >> where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal >> of simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common >> committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce >> committers. >> >> Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> -- Owen > From general-return-1959-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 22:37:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88485 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 22:37:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 22:37:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 84563 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 22:37:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84523 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 22:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84515 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 22:37:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:37:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:37:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 88440 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 22:37:19 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.104]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:37:19 +0000 Message-ID: <4C69BD9E.9030802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:37:18 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 I believe that so long as we have synchronized releases then we're co-developing a single product and should be a single community. Doug On 08/16/2010 02:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or > HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases > where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of > simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common > committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce > committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-1960-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 16 23:51:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24482 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 23:51:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 23:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 51196 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 23:51:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51071 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2010 23:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51063 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2010 23:51:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:51:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:51:33 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.10.20.2] (166-205-142-204.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.142.204]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L79001A9RL44I50@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:51:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008160212 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-16_09:2010-08-17,2010-08-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <4C69BD9E.9030802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:51:03 -0700 Message-id: <48C487FD-C99E-461B-996E-4711C786D992@mac.com> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> <4C69BD9E.9030802@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug, I don't think that's what this vote is doing. It's not giving all committers access to HDFS + MR + Common. It seems to be just making committers for Common the union of HDFS and MR. I'm +1 on the vote. Nige On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +1 I believe that so long as we have synchronized releases then we're co-developing a single product and should be a single community. > > Doug > > On 08/16/2010 02:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or >> HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases >> where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of >> simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common >> committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce >> committers. >> >> Clearly, I'm +1. >> >> -- Owen From general-return-1961-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 02:06:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93529 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 02:06:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 02:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 65687 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 02:06:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65544 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 02:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65530 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 02:06:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:06:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of swhitecross@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:06:24 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so5458424vws.35 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XnSy1u1za9giTboE2LCeyg8UpCPvJqn+pjFJpLxL09I=; b=v9wbLmVHVxGb1KfNhXbvynDhyOIVbHiFXtFFVmVlBwcWB0mkjHIFiSjL+T9iLaaObf sd3wwcDZI0mUWz7IuZ3615VdEW2PaSC17lQDrePm8CRpz6yCdVctKMk5nC3l8NOMEu1X Y+T6/2dKsLuLrErMxx7r26B5+K97/76Ims+rM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eVZwLrjbcvuEJ+YF3+jhGO6A2Bw0eqLHg/qBjzD8FjvybrFQ/hadwWGGWGgoN7+VWQ 7aFGd5PyMBNS6+DYwfwON/vFxPqXzvqNC8jAF7CFYRKqtbkALOHZcw2E0FpQaEmDRYbD ei+VnhEB1cMDIWnXlph2ymJbzN6UT9zBKNPEg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.9 with SMTP id d9mr3603382vcx.249.1282010763363; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.128.204 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:06:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0F9D3E90-4F42-4DFC-B48A-F61A6B476F42@yahoo-inc.com> References: <0F9D3E90-4F42-4DFC-B48A-F61A6B476F42@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:06:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listing Hadoop Job History Statistics From: Scott Whitecross To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e8878e3260567048dfb6447 --e0cb4e8878e3260567048dfb6447 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the answers Doug and Arun. I'm assuming the job-history files mentioned are in ./hadoop-0.20/logs/history/done/. The files look like they were serialized by a class in Hadoop? (If I can read the files back into the appropriate class, and then dump them out into a custom format, that'd be great.) Thanks. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Moving to mapreduce-user@, bcc general@. > > There isn't a direct way. One possible option is just use the per-job > job-history file which is on HDFS (See > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Job+Submission+and+Monitoringfor info on job-history). > > Hope that helps. > > Arun > > > On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Scott Whitecross wrote: > > Hi - >> >> What's the best way to list and query information on Hadoop job histories? >> For example, I'd like to see the job names from the past week against a >> Hadoop cluster I'm using. I don't see an API call or a way through the >> command line to pull the information. Is the best way writing a quick >> script to process the job history files? >> >> Thanks. >> Scott >> > > --e0cb4e8878e3260567048dfb6447-- From general-return-1962-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 04:30:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47013 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 04:30:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 04:30:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 35502 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 04:30:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34668 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 04:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34653 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 04:30:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:30:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:30:13 +0000 Received: from dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com ([10.66.77.50]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7H4TgM1097810; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C6A1036.6080004@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:59:42 +0530 From: Ranjit Mathew Organization: Yahoo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Whitecross CC: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Listing Hadoop Job History Statistics References: <0F9D3E90-4F42-4DFC-B48A-F61A6B476F42@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [BCC-ing "general" - again.] On Tuesday 17 August 2010 07:36 AM, Scott Whitecross wrote: > Thanks for the answers Doug and Arun. I'm assuming the job-history files > mentioned are in ./hadoop-0.20/logs/history/done/. The files look like they > were serialized by a class in Hadoop? (If I can read the files back into > the appropriate class, and then dump them out into a custom format, that'd > be great.) Rumen (src/tools/org/apache/hadoop/tools/rumen/) parses Job History files and creates JSON files that can be either be loaded independently, or via the API provided by Rumen itself. As an added benefit, it abstracts away the differences between the 0.20.xx format and the Avro-based format used in trunk. There is not much documentation on Rumen right now, but MAPREDUCE-1918 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1918) attempts to fix that. HTH, Ranjit > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> Moving to mapreduce-user@, bcc general@. >> >> There isn't a direct way. One possible option is just use the per-job >> job-history file which is on HDFS (See >> http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Job+Submission+and+Monitoringfor info on job-history). >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> Arun >> >> >> On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Scott Whitecross wrote: >> >> Hi - >>> >>> What's the best way to list and query information on Hadoop job histories? >>> For example, I'd like to see the job names from the past week against a >>> Hadoop cluster I'm using. I don't see an API call or a way through the >>> command line to pull the information. Is the best way writing a quick >>> script to process the job history files? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Scott >>> >> >> From general-return-1963-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 06:15:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84158 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 06:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 06:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 97172 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 06:15:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96789 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 06:15:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96781 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 06:15:02 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:15:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:14:38 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so5642018vws.35 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DjOVFZC6SMlDrnUIjNj1zOn1c0wpCpPSxlF5Soq8p3w=; b=shCIpERAQ4546LLyYDv7a95Pb06W8rMatqEMW3JOPld9SfqkEInBrAyFT2PoASmqZs lFknfRI8k3ovtvixxPlJNOZX2PrQGeUsNvJiGHdfMxU95hZmRg0CkujsRBQbXBu/NuWT yUTa1xab+HY8YPm+b7cWckpB0N81s/3d5K444= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TC8jI2YV5HR3gVomSwuLk0gSPINGvK6eMIpFGtFOFE8L+Fram76iOPYJFcinnRcy5D ZBsCK7irH9Yg8Vk889fJS2YnN79qA9dpkDKp0uwvebzPJW4q0ScOPz/aZDXALLcNPiK0 aV6RznQO4ZaLndvN11t9sEALupWdoVzKaZJHo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.121.206 with SMTP id i14mr3701407vcr.1.1282025657782; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.135 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:14:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:44:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Thanks Hemanth On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1964-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 10:16:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84581 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 10:16:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 10:16:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 37419 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:16:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37139 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37131 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 10:16:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:16:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 84491 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 10:15:49 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:15:49 +0000 Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so3347713gwj.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:15:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.13 with SMTP id t13mr7248650ibx.160.1282040147936; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:15:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma in the other? If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common are unaffected. Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires consensus. ---- Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. As I'm reading it: A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual appointments to Common continue. A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C From general-return-1965-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 10:17:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84877 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 10:17:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 10:17:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 38912 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:17:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38814 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38792 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 10:17:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 84775 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 10:16:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:16:45 +0000 Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so3355361yxm.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:16:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.157.212 with SMTP id c20mr7238512ibx.186.1282040202723; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:16:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1966-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 10:27:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88442 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 10:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 10:27:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 56534 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:27:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56136 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 10:27:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56128 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 10:27:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:27:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bjoern@schiessle.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [78.46.69.5] (HELO zucker.schokokeks.org) (78.46.69.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:27:44 +0000 Received: from pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [::ffff:129.69.216.55]) (AUTH: LOGIN schiesbn@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by zucker.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:27:23 +0200 id 0000000000018010.000000004C6A640B.00003F69 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:27:19 +0200 From: Bjoern Schiessle To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Status of the Heart proposal? Message-ID: <20100817122719.1165533d@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I'm quite new to Hadoop and discover all the possibilities. I read about the Heart proposal[1] and it sounds really promising. But it looks a little bit outdated. The link to the subversion repository[2] is dead and the documentation[3] only links to some directories. What is the status of the proposal? Is it still active? Btw: Are there online archives for the mailing lists like heart-dev@incubator.apache.org and heart-user@incubator.apache.org? I couldn't find it. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeartProposal [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/heart [3] http://heart.korea.ac.kr/ best wishes, Bj=F6rn --=20 Bj=F6rn Schie=DFle Support Free Software, join FSFE's Fellowship (fellowship.fsfe.org) Buy books and support Free Software (wiki.fsfe.org/SupportPrograms) From general-return-1967-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:08:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46973 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:08:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 60720 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60567 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60559 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:08:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:08:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:08:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31452B7D14 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:51 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ungrqCT7fxCg for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABF3B7D13 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:49 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1282666057.38931@vkbqdBkLAHKXbfy4GLOH5w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7HG7bsg004692 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C6AB3C9.3050705@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:07:37 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7HG7bsg004692 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 16/08/10 22:38, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or > HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases > where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of > simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common > committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce > committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen +1 steve. Presumably this means I need to read the hdfs-dev and mapred-dev lists too ... From general-return-1968-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:10:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47958 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 62968 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62904 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62896 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:10:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:10:26 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so3562993bwz.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.103.199 with SMTP id l7mr4565557bko.18.1282061404888; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1969-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:11:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48218 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:11:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:11:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 64202 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:11:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64116 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:11:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64107 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:11:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:11:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 209.85.214.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tom@cloudera.com) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:11:01 +0000 Received: by mail-bw0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 14so3562993bwz.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.35.69 with SMTP id o5mr4536490bkd.87.1282061441356; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:10:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? +1 Tom From general-return-1970-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:13:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49458 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:13:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:13:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 72988 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:13:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72808 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72800 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:13:33 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:13:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:13:10 +0000 Received: by pvg3 with SMTP id 3so3380199pvg.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.128.12 with SMTP id a12mr6068853wfd.9.1282061569354; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.177.15 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:12:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Eli From general-return-1971-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 16:31:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57580 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 16:31:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 16:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 97400 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:31:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97282 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 16:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97274 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:31:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:31:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:31:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 57463 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 16:31:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.123]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:31:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4C6AB94F.8090405@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:31:11 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On 08/17/2010 03:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? > > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. > > Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a > reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires > consensus. > > ---- > > Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the > Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers > (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. > As I'm reading it: > > A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. > A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. > A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or > Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual > appointments to Common continue. > A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to > HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. > > In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to > either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C From general-return-1972-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 17:18:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80681 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 17:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 17:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 70341 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:17:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70223 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:17:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70206 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 17:17:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:17:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:17:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 80506 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 17:17:37 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:17:37 +0000 Received: by ywg4 with SMTP id 4so2176856ywg.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.191.147 with SMTP id dm19mr7903319ibb.6.1282065455708; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:17:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 -C On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1973-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 17:28:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86210 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 17:28:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 17:28:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 85336 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85269 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85261 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 17:28:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:28:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.56.20] (HELO n1.bullet.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (206.190.56.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:28:37 +0000 Received: from [68.142.237.90] by n1.bullet.re4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2010 17:28:16 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.153] by t6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2010 17:28:16 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp206.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2010 17:28:16 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 169820.31105.bm@omp206.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 27824 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Aug 2010 17:28:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282066096; bh=/rFJk6RRiO4ozDmufe7yRkC8423WAlQ/eqlQrnaN9VA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vo+iGk58092eQ/sdOfGqV7PuKjAbL32D+jNnDhXv4SJylj0r2WcSZig24/debzQrwm74q8b9dRlpuXvkgE0l5gnflFqmzKjJ57FCUw+L5ctpgY9ckz6H05Prxivcp5gGJi7MioO5rLbYx23dmDAXGqTKfxT7iyfhXeuAN9Abon0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YQi5rI2SsJjFbHtoWVOjm0iWpiEsgCq4vP7BpElt1HG0nX3EkgF3YRNtpArthUUM3xAxU3JCxB4T7aF2Oab3k4ObiXT7nC5HmjwkijMOQblXBay+ilH8vRaAiOyVYw4TQwaXjKRjgVzV1GlIQMLAq6NkOPTqA3ObObrNQlJaMYI=; Message-ID: <54087.26421.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: pauG06IVM1kyb6r13V74LdKbyZbWByTJqN8DzAZWWUMvUJX CaSLfL3WAFRH1N0UWNNCOTD1AYup0lhtPM4pXF8NEY528npDPFaS2cKVQOkC viBy91Srweo5ghEztUzvvPLsrPxKnXUH9gQpFSH_QmnJn9MReXawgw1u1Dko 81ObdeKMpoTwt5Ovy.rUkVWJZCQQ0DchoRvZAypUtBzgxWAEFP9jKpMJSQnN bi_lL139bqKNj.H67t_ok.pqcBjsftJg7rOcP5Pr80SD9i1bHOF.V_EqmMIV uYLt0Zkafi71drDlKiegUmxik4o7ZVxmc4rDqYAZC4QW4FIdlyW9fGAwWNX6 tXauq7LZsxun6uIde7aOP2t07YHB7zEjW72bukPZY8t16Troo Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:28:15 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:28:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii It is possibly to have contributors who are only interested in RPC, serialization, compression, etc. However, just as Owen mentioned, we don't have such cases yet. We might decide how to accommodate these contributors when we have such cases. +1 Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Owen O'Malley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:38:53 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce >committers? > > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS >committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we >wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying the >structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely the >union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1974-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 17:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91072 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 17:42:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 17:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3264 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3177 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 17:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3147 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 17:42:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:42:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of teamphy6@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:42:03 +0000 Received: by gyb13 with SMTP id 13so3651872gyb.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZwoNf4SrOQDhUDHiVBDtVUt/T5vjb7ajOZ/d95GuNsc=; b=F1d6xc54sLJShS8RKeD8gKJsKY9nhCxyycXfNCdZ4RwfPgIFtJe/597Hl4NXulWSZ8 RfGj055AMI1dBi7P6yGVrnJvJ5yojDclSrm+8F6KMF/MPmUTUe7WKS5aLSaZSF+UMWpg Ci7JVSG1193YSVV1EUIZrC6XFxdJTubTxXPzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ofZl8TOLJMGbPG/YWAfZgpkQhsJ036I4dlFClqaakNT0qLheZGZWVxDws6DLlA7/8E FGtSZpJsaczJEKMovShPqp8+/0lg6hvyaB70NY3U4Ny/Hk3sFZl/ZDvQDtfy61FJTL9y CZJ2KYpfIh0MuVpoDXEiHGl5+tNiLgGecxVy0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.131.18 with SMTP id e18mr7911335and.219.1282066902402; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.36.9 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54087.26421.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> <54087.26421.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:41:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Daniel Jue To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > It is possibly to have contributors who are only interested in RPC, > serialization, compression, etc. =A0However, just as Owen mentioned, we d= on't have > such cases yet. =A0We might decide how to accommodate these contributors = when we > have such cases. > > +1 > > Nicholas > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Owen O'Malley >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:38:53 PM >> Subject: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapRedu= ce >>committers? >> >> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDF= S >>committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where w= e >>wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifyin= g the >>structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely = the >>union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. >> >> Clearly, I'm =A0+1. >> >> -- Owen >> > > From general-return-1975-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 18:04:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1357 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 18:04:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 18:04:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 48880 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 18:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48787 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 18:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48779 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 18:04:44 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:04:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:04:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c110.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.110]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7HI3eJI083148 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-organization:user-agent; b=B/bEgi+esLd/CQN7vexmYZt3Cmx4p/2WwWewG40Zd5T6dXbS7KEWO3xsvzrEj6kH Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:03:39 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Message-ID: <20100817180338.GC89226@goodenter-lm.local> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1=20 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:16AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1 >=20 > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HD= FS > > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where= we > > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplify= ing > > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as prec= isely > > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > -- Owen > > --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkxqzvoACgkQMqXifkwDoaHX7AD/a8u7+gJf4E6NGLLQfVu3lYTJ 2IBr3TxYcc3vnvGuNQkA/3WsF8SOkc01mt4WAY2Dtgk9b4BjINWv8lHBbeaWUWm9 =TJr/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK-- From general-return-1976-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 18:24:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19763 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 18:24:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 18:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 71628 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 18:24:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71454 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 18:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71434 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 18:24:46 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:24:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:24:24 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so1067255qyk.14 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:24:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MSXoYpwQf58NR6YsUknwWZ/hYcp3pd91+V/dPYmQa3o=; b=QNRVYaafNKEuLK4/sqjgOzOlmNqchFFfq9SO8x0cGnfBwt7a6bxMnFGlukeol69U1o XzJt2zbJSuaHAAtWdrtg8BYuBeRxY9eV96RxUF0TpgyT7mPE04gKfecRk2cXChq0mJXW MxgsZrcAaCgu7jtMVy/ZpdfB4AYof6br+9CsY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=oAeVMi3E7OKCVpP4BJ4xSYqc9oHhzNWHgQ8xGD7mL1FUrMFIji189DADgi13jz+xSw lUoYHHd5SSoM4GN8Zl9hWyNZb9P4GyQ+cvdf1TcZrJ2D4imf4XsfMcuDOZJ/W/LyQw7c Gb3O0gWtSY+jbI6i3ZFTuZfPd4e38BF6kyPQM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.119.20 with SMTP id x20mr4548426qaq.249.1282069442945; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.236.82 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:24:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Chukwa mailing lists will be moved soon From: Bernd Fondermann To: chukwa-dev@hadoop.apache.org, chukwa-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi everyone, All mailing lists, chukwa-dev@, chukwa-user@ and chukwa-commits@hadoop.apache.org will be moved over to ...@incubator.apache.org, over the next days. As a subscriber, there is nothing you have to do. It will "just work", fingers crossed. But please be aware to adjust your mailing list filters, eventually. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2934 Thanks for your continued interest in Chukwa, Bernd From general-return-1977-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 19:08:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43842 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 19:08:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 19:08:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 37256 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 19:07:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36912 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 19:07:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36884 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 19:07:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:07:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:07:34 +0000 Received: from g225064220.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.64.220] helo=motokokusanagi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OlRVB-0003g3-PU; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:07:13 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: community@apache.org Subject: Apache Dinner DUS (co-located with FSFE fellowship meetup) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:06:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: java-user@lucene.apache.org, user@mahout.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3207924.hMO8L3MZZH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008172107.08117.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart3207924.hMO8L3MZZH Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, the evening after FrOSCon - that is on August 22nd 2010 at 7:30p.m. CEST - = a=20 combined "FSFE Fellowship meetup/ Apache dinner*" takes place in Tigges in= =20 D=FCsseldorf (Brunnenstra=DFe 1, at Bilker S-Bahnhof). Given it doesn't rai= n, we'll=20 be sitting outside. Would be great to meet you there for tasty food, interesting discussions on= =20 Apache in general, as well as projects like Lucene, Hadoop or Tomcat in=20 particular. Anyone interested in either the FSFE or Apache is welcome to jo= in=20 us. One personal request: Somehow, Rainer (Kersten, FSFE) talked me into prepar= ing a=20 talk on what the ASF is all about - would be really great to have more peop= le=20 around share their experience. See you in D=FCsseldorf, Isabel=20 * http://blog.isabel-drost.de/index.php/archives/category/events/apache-din= ner- berlin --nextPart3207924.hMO8L3MZZH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxq3dMACgkQPJpCBAwIhbTtLACgrGdZpWH6P5mYBJtsxwDSpiD/ B2gAnRbm4TVlceARdnUU/FfX6j5irkXk =HqWO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3207924.hMO8L3MZZH-- From general-return-1978-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 19:39:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63978 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 19:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 19:39:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 86145 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 19:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86045 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 19:39:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86035 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 19:39:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:39:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:39:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 63914 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 19:39:17 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:39:17 +0000 Received: by gyb13 with SMTP id 13so3756933gyb.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.174.65 with SMTP id s1mr8109815ibz.3.1282073956500; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.146.206 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C6AB94F.8090405@apache.org> References: <4C6AB94F.8090405@apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:39:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -1 I think it is clear that separate communities are developing for HDFS and MapReduce (unlike Common) and will further develop if we allow them to. There will continue to be significant overlap between those communities, but I think it is a useful distinction and matches the way that users think about the projects. -- Owen From general-return-1979-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 21:36:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14089 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 21:36:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 21:36:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 45821 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 21:36:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45673 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 21:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45665 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 21:36:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:36:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:36:29 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7HLZbx9088992 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=jm96TRIyA9XoCmpN79xVmTfNs5syOY2TRt5Ee7go8jSelYu4jg+rrkXSwHN2tXyA Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:35:37 -0700 References: <4C6AB94F.8090405@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) -1 I agree, we need to allow HDFS and Map-Reduce to further develop into coherent, independent communities. This seems like a step backwards. Arun On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > -1 > > I think it is clear that separate communities are developing for HDFS > and MapReduce (unlike Common) and will further develop if we allow > them to. There will continue to be significant overlap between those > communities, but I think it is a useful distinction and matches the > way that users think about the projects. > > -- Owen From general-return-1980-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 22:05:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22309 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 22:04:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 22:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 79986 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 22:04:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79927 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 22:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79919 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 22:04:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:04:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:04:48 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.10.20.2] (166-205-142-080.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.142.80]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7B00AFKHB4ZK70@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008170169 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-17_11:2010-08-17,2010-08-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:04:15 -0700 Message-id: <6ED46D65-0B00-4F9A-BC11-4FB4BA206466@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) +1 On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? > > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. > > Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a > reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires > consensus. > > ---- > > Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the > Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers > (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. > As I'm reading it: > > A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. > A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. > A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or > Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual > appointments to Common continue. > A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to > HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. > > In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to > either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C From general-return-1981-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 17 22:45:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44325 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 22:45:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 22:45:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 37770 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 22:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37592 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 22:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37584 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 22:45:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:45:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystaldoll06@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:45:07 +0000 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so10230650wyb.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=742xF8SSb2q8q4C6VomKZocNTpa3L/KnNm/hljE4I9g=; b=pjPgPQtu3wuvWxvnOz4LD268YZoLFPNKU7hoMraWett6+d4iQHmr3FWMuxmUH3occj Ue4uYOINpcLIfIKEnJioy/jsECnvjqzmXTmrqXOPDaZye8tJC9eimy18zXibAkcat3Nw XWsQ/ikseGEFaT+SfYpPHq3Oid6KI7XKMb2b4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bfewY3alN/QtoRbBHWKl1D1r5iVaj49m/4OftJdYJpQujEXQpxJtLKRY997YID/7Dr fKyy9m2etMSxr7HRUDapXC8+ktSUlB2VklKVr2FqylNIGsgf4iw6G9h68Lh8IL2lypkT aKDek0Z97lwLZ3MV6LwmB/dvgBEfW9JoF4VI8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.150.195 with SMTP id z45mr1327564wej.63.1282085087427; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.237.90 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:44:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C68DA5E.8080504@verchaska.com> References: <4C677028.8000502@gmail.com> <4C67757B.8050108@gmail.com> <4C67798F.4010701@gmail.com> <4C68DA5E.8080504@verchaska.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop basics From: Rita Liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Piyush and Amit: Thanks so much for your kind suggestions!! I am trying log4j now :)) Here is a beginner-level question -- where should I put the loggers? Say I start with a MapReduce application (say, WordCount.java), and I want to trace the code so that I could know which methods (from which classes) have been called and what have been done while they are being called, before hadoop finishes executing the application. In order to write log files to record those information, I have to know where (i.e. in which files) to put my loggers. However, without knowing which methods (from which classes) are called, how do I know where to put the loggers? If I just put my logger inside the main method of WordCount.java, it probably doesn't make too much sense ... Is there any way to trace the call stack so that I would know where to put my loggers (with log4j)? Or: there might be a smart way for me to create a logger so that I would get what I need? Also -- although I know debugging in a distributed system could be a pain, I wonder if I could just load the whole hadoop project into Eclipse, say, and trace the code locally without actually running the application on the cluster. There are many libs and consequent dependencies in hadoop -- how may I load hadoop so that I could locally trace it? If possible, please help me out ... Piyush, Amit, and all the experts here? Thank you very much! Best, Rita :)) On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, amit kumar verma w= rote: > > =A0Hi Rita, > > If you reached a place where you need to use api like hahoop, forget abou= t the debugging the code. Your code must be syntactically and logically err= or free, for rest of the things logging is enough. Try log4j only. > > Thanks, > Amit Kumar Verma > Verchaska Infotech Pvt. Ltd. > > > > On 08/15/2010 11:10 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >> >> Hi Harsh and Piyush! Thank you very much. So it seems like it would be b= est >> if I use log4j to trace, and debugging with a debugger is still possible= if >> I set "mapred.job.tracker" to be "local" and "fs.default.name" to be >> "local", in hadoop-site.xml. Plus: in hadoop-env.sh, I should specify >> HADOOP_OPTS to be: >> >> "-agentlib:jdwp=3Dtransport=3Ddt_socket,server=3Dy,suspend=3Dy,address= =3D8000" (why >> 8000? also, what does "-agentlib:jdwp=3Dtransport=3Ddt_socket" mean?) >> >> ... in order to use a debugger. Is my understanding correct? :) >> >> If so -- then which debugger do you use? May I know? Thanks a lot! I am = also >> going to try log4j now! >> >> Many thanks, >> -Rita :)) >> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Piyush Gargwro= te: >> >>> Hi Smith, >>> >>> step debugging also works in hadoop as with other java applications. >>> export >>> >>> HADOOP_OPTS=3D"-agentlib:jdwp=3Dtransport=3Ddt_socket,server=3Dy,suspen= d=3Dy,address=3D8000" >>> 'suspend=3Dy' is to let the jvm suspend until the remote debugger is >>> attached. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Piyush Garg >>> >>> >>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:39 AM, smith jack wrote: >>>> >>>> that means you can only trace by log, >>>> and not possible to debug hadoop using step debug, haha >>>> distributed system always introduce extra complexity and confusing >>> >>> issues. >>>> >>>> 2010/8/15 Piyush Garg: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rita, >>>>> >>>>> You can put log4j logger debug statements in the code. log4j library = is >>>>> part of hadoop framework and there is already a log4j.properties file= in >>>>> hadoop conf directory and all the output logs are saved in hadoop log= s >>>>> directory. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>> Piyush Garg >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 10:20 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much, Piyush! :) May I know more about how to use >>> >>> "traces"? >>>>>> >>>>>> And -- yes, please teach me if possible, experts! :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot, >>>>>> -Rita :)) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Piyush Garg >>> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rita, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have just started to learn hadoop as well, I know there is a long >>> >>> way >>>>>>> >>>>>>> to go. >>>>>>> I found some useful links which I am sharing with you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hadoop Tutorial - YDN >>>>>>> =A0excellen= t >>>>>>> beginners tutorial and well organized. >>>>>>> Running Hadoop On Ubuntu Linux (Single-Node Cluster) - Michael G. N= oll >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Sing= le-Node_Cluster%29 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Multi-Node_Cluster) >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>> http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_%28Mult= i-Node_Cluster%29 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The tutorial on the hadoop wiki >>>>>>> >>> >>> is >>>>>>> >>>>>>> too much for a beginner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Debugger: >>>>>>> I do not think you can easily do debugging using remote debugger. T= his >>>>>>> is natural since hadoop is not sequential programming, it would be >>> >>> very >>>>>>> >>>>>>> difficult to debug its apps. >>>>>>> The only way to debug is to use traces. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think you can learn how to setup multi-node cluster, but for >>> >>> practice >>>>>>> >>>>>>> session you can use single node setup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lets see what the experts say. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>>> Piyush Garg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sunday 15 August 2010 09:07 AM, Rita Liu wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am a total beginner, but I am very interested in hadoop. I've >>> >>> already >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> downloaded hadoop 0.19.2 and run on Ubuntu in single-node mode. No= w I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> want >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to do two things: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Explore how hadoop works internally with one of the example >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> applications >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hadoop provides >>>>>>>> 2. Write an application on my own >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those two things bring me following questions: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a. debugger? >>>>>>>> I am stuck since I don't know how to "explore" hadoop. I used to >>> >>> trace >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> through the code using a debugger, but in this case, I don't know = if >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> there >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is a good debugger to use; or -- maybe a debugger is not necessary >>> >>> for >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hadoop? If not, then how do you trace through the code to either >>> >>> debug or >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> just gain an understanding about the system? May I know what you, >>>>>>>> experienced experts, do? :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> b. Where to run hadoop? >>>>>>>> Also -- may I know where you run your hadoop? Do you run on linux,= or >>> >>> on >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> VM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- in particular, Cloudera? I heard that Cloudera is good for writ= ing >>>>>>>> mapreduce applications with hadoop itself as a blackbox; is it tru= e? >>> >>> If >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ultimate goal is to understand how hadoop works internally, would = it >>> >>> be >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> better if I directly run it on linux? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> c. Single-node or multi-node? >>>>>>>> In the beginning (just like my case :p) would it be better to use >>>>>>>> single-node or multi-node? If the latter is true, should I obtain >>> >>> more >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> machines, or should I use more virtual machines to create more nod= es? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a newbie, I am sorry for all those basic (and silly, I know :$) >>>>>>>> questions. If possible, please help me out? Any suggestion or advi= ce >>> >>> will >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> greatly appreciated. Thank you very much! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Rita :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> P.S. If my questions are not suitable for this mailing-list, pleas= e >>> >>> let >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> apologize, and then, could you please direct me to other >>> >>> mailing-lists? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, and thanks a lot! :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From general-return-1982-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 04:53:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88886 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 04:53:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 04:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 98985 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 04:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98483 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 04:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98475 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 04:53:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:01 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so255394vws.35 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:52:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wn6yxBx7/J5ykqgev2rMGQw9xgR5t0oJctd0eHMwyy0=; b=JijLVVkLJln8iyQ4i29B83syq1gDA1S1VlbdcxH1nioa9H278qI4T6UfPvKQzgrN3m 4yWP1mIfd9XB02sNx5Vk9Y5ePS7AWab9ZvWOVN0XVW7W2Qo/DtC1bEVkSS4mNbV0XGIu Ipfo46Ll5IlKcvwBrA53dEwrWK3iYMytYpWvY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lJxw15PVtW7oS4JjNzpKeV2sebAJHB3ySf+MHIfHNzPLB1CVzzSOS1VTsJhFNv6HUL BXpIY7GKxMs6gXu2TNjRZBdqJMkgCz2at5fHiy0xG+1d7Nu6vmQ5jYJ1hbeou0emwipY N26y5Sfrpfprdc5lmX8h8Vk8Xij6mfc08DtvM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.121.210 with SMTP id i18mr4444629vcr.8.1282107160812; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.135 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:52:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:22:40 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -1. After thinking through, I do feel that there is and will be a trend where more folks will focus on only one of the two projects. I certainly know of several Map/Reduce committers who are not active on HDFS and vice-versa, and therefore couldn't qualify to have commit rights on both projects. Thanks Hemanth On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? > > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. > > Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a > reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires > consensus. > > ---- > > Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the > Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers > (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. > As I'm reading it: > > A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. > A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. > A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or > Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual > appointments to Common continue. > A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to > HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. > > In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to > either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C > From general-return-1983-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 13:43:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20818 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 13:43:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 13:43:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 495 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 13:43:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99619 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 13:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99601 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 13:43:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:43:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:42:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417C8B7DCA for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:42:37 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NyUcomHUmsG2 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:42:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCCAB7DC2 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:42:36 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1282743744.06828@t+vKB6KzaEAvuDT+dYaFiw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7IDgNew000346 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:42:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C6BE33F.6000104@apache.org> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:42:23 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7IDgNew000346 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 17/08/10 11:15, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? 0 I don't know. A big driver for the split was the volume of emails, for a dev you had to track lots of jira issues across the board. Having the split has been bad for me in that I've got lazy about tracking everything, which is what you need to do to understand what's going on. Question is -how many people need to understand all that's going on? And of those people who are trying to do this, how do they get time for anything else? I do think having some separate user groups where hdfs and mapreduce issues can be discussed is good, so some separation there does seem to help, though it's not clear for new users which list to go to. -steve From general-return-1984-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 15:36:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87674 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 15:36:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39886 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39744 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39736 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:36:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.206.147] (HELO n20.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.206.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:35:57 +0000 Received: from [68.142.194.244] by n20.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:35:33 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.133] by t2.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:32:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp106.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2010 15:31:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 355642.23043.bm@omp106.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 19305 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Aug 2010 15:31:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282145460; bh=MDOIX0v9EKeoU4tUOPI16wO93GZsFhGpxC+A7zLT2O4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q7sahUiGhlhkhC7sKvNS8UcShN5J5pZ/eIzJc1VMgbwVGrBpDLjPIdpaDCbKb5pZ5LWa2a8YOuZkso5YP2/d8RNFeCzNiRi9py0DXYW3HzgGksS2CQ52qoJTXBOQ7xuGjO9rK99vOd0bawNRkF97IcxEGspmB9Li7r2jHCUpQwE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E9wVrwqXGjerxeuGGwUOgVPnvrMnOjgaw4gHapQjrohGiddDRSZp9Ul/wWj5OrjC3XUCGTzQNJFddypx3HVmBpIHQdMcRmtPsQGET11SqGqO7CwzZ0letNQWGJE25WUyBissOQMQTAhKu/rWwWvDml+a3ehas6g2HgtSEyeGUTE=; Message-ID: <264147.15518.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: zej5Q8gVM1mKt2XH_fbDLGj88SSgDvTm8HEgawgf3qjCFIm bzaYGCB2wtDMY3GE2ShbHMxLIl3gDQnDqo0ogLYBP_tRUSHVHEPVpxpcu7Xm EELCNPfBgAFPYERttLQMrZK3noZpfRRdsiDIRCydYILapjLdfT4uDM54Xk6w nEfWxyj5SezOB5hFcr..yPSBUU1LRrRQKr4c05imXArNuydj5WdR7ZXpdsLp QziavWcrAviopmH25rRKid5aiaJhNR_ub9pN41H7O7NqN.uh55SdCTBim5zg oC6bCTDh092J69aaFYMv7AzJV.OGZo6v4.gbUUxXomTqi0wVkfRZomLQluVP q6iNrFX60VlzRZcWlijtjlbtiJNB54uodCyI- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:31:00 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:31:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -1 Most committers work on either HDFS or MapReduce in general. For the cases that contributors may provide patches on both projects, those people will gain committer accesses on both projects. For the occasional cases that some issues may require patches to be committed on both projects, it totally makes sense to find a committer on each project reviewing and committing those patches. Nicholas ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chris Douglas > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 3:15:47 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers > > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? From general-return-1985-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 15:57:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94570 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 15:57:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 15:57:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 82596 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:57:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82484 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 15:57:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82476 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 15:57:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:57:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:57:39 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.10.20.5] (166-205-143-140.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.143.140]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7C00L5ZUZ31Q90@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008180100 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-18_07:2010-08-18,2010-08-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <264147.15518.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:57:04 -0700 Message-id: <2A843341-8207-40DA-96B8-192FAE05C3A2@mac.com> References: <264147.15518.qm@web56202.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) I have a technical question if this vote fails. Since we still release MR and HDFS together as Hadoop, does this mean that only committers who can commit to both projects can then make a release candidate of Hadoop? Do we end up with MR committers, HDFS committers, and Hadoop committers? Nige On Aug 18, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > -1 > > Most committers work on either HDFS or MapReduce in general. For the cases that > contributors may provide patches on both projects, those people will gain > committer accesses on both projects. For the occasional cases that some issues > may require patches to be committed on both projects, it totally makes sense to > find a committer on each project reviewing and committing those patches. > > Nicholas > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Chris Douglas >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 3:15:47 AM >> Subject: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers >> >> Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY >> >> Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all >> subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma >> in the other? > From general-return-1986-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 18:01:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65605 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 18:01:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 18:01:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 55220 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:01:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55130 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55122 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 18:01:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:01:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:01:00 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7IHxDQa031017 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:59:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xq85z/MNwv4ND8Ud59+bvnbDKub2b0YphA/ebbmaZZfO+MGJrG67ISwoK3VTEgYk Message-ID: <4C6C1F70.4000300@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:59:12 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 Do I understand correctly, with this proposal there will be no common only committers? That is, there will be no committers to common who are not either HDFS or MR committers. --Konstantin On 8/16/2010 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or > HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases > where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal > of simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common > committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce > committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1987-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 18:19:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76350 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 87321 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87195 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87182 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.96] (HELO qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:47 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id voAh1e0021uE5Es59uKTWV; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:27 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vuKH1e00D2SbwD53cuKL3V; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:19:25 +0000 Message-Id: <62188BE8-B003-4169-A0A5-C718241FD3A0@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4C6C1F70.4000300@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:19:16 -0700 References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> <4C6C1F70.4000300@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 18, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > +1 > > Do I understand correctly, with this proposal there will be no > common only committers? That is, there will be no committers to > common who are not either HDFS or MR committers. Correct. There haven't been any and there doesn't seem to be enough stand alone functionality in Common that it seems likely. (ie. a Commons only committer wouldn't be able to do enough to be interesting.) -- Owen From general-return-1988-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 18 18:32:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91213 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2010 18:32:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2010 18:32:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21472 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:32:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21415 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21407 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:32:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:32:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([10.72.168.47]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7IIV5mQ064016 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:31:05 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers Message-ID: <20100818183105.GA9985@goodenter-lm.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I tend to +1 on this because most of Hadoop committers wear both hats alrea= dy. Most of those who aren't should have for all I know. The argument about enforcing projects separation by the means of splitting = dev. communities doesn't hold the critique IMO. True separation would come from design independence and well defined contracts between components, not from the perception of the policies. Cos On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:15AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY >=20 > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? >=20 > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkxsJukACgkQMqXifkwDoaHkJAD/YyzOdi1eFd923j6cS9pVlxes 2HP4frd83MMvd6DnbvcA/RzZ5xTry5uUBRgO0H7KsfkQzOITwLIw8bNDcWiSieKa =5KXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From general-return-1989-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 19 13:41:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59267 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 13:41:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 13:41:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 58519 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 13:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58041 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57991 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 13:41:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:41:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:41:00 +0000 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so2086299wwb.29 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OPvohPKilTlNKQ0i6xTwbkvUHtgvWJLA/Gw9JmPL9rI=; b=OgSrqf2SAU1qmltWqGQXHi2XJqHhRCqyf/9azznu5ybWn6E8pMVkIQmQhnc2NafbUL jC1b34dGe4vSHToLfrDCzW4+ge18XnSU7yVTlHn25TegID+0jKaWtAked9KW0IhUxEdJ z4EJs2bTFsOWgwD7dWiSjrBC3SeAoapZqD+HM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gK/Hx/25vPexYP6TvX4m/gA7fZHXWvUAgQkD4WdLqwxVqazLiqrHZInDhj790HlYXJ k6aM/LZctAR5oAzBHxXgjrIHz7mjJPgIZIgUGIGMkTu5GX8j7PI/pAVE90sGYYGlZNrd 7RFIcpFcH/s7nLoy5CzM+MDzL1dmCBgaQXpOE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.141.77 with SMTP id l13mr8516248wbu.77.1282225237980; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.139.17 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:10:37 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Warning : Missing blocks From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f5e6d4f957048e2d531b --0016e659f5e6d4f957048e2d531b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I added a server to my pseudo distributed cluster. But still web viewer shows only 1 live node and disk space is still same. I am getting this message :- WARNING : There are about 18 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. Please help. Vaibhav Negi --0016e659f5e6d4f957048e2d531b-- From general-return-1990-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 19 18:41:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47880 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 18:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 18:41:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 66494 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 18:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66406 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 18:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66398 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 18:41:40 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:41:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:41:17 +0000 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so2471157wwb.29 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ZdEtOrZmc+kj69Ejgify9RHmVYEUGcU/0RJCnGsY5uI=; b=VGd07q5ORExf6caGEpKhjpXkPK4t0rIJ7WzIyUCGzsHZgWm7KBPyxxXnyhR7gOS2hP 3Vbo//HsKjKPwncU9OWEX+8Moe3d+ZS5VaygAyRrzgPry2A/X6wcBxyOm2HdWtraLIG9 F+lTCe8hvjiVvNE6SRWqp8fqcITIglt/QG/Ko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Bt74OiSuocLXShzRLB/SACQMkJ9FrHnootWKNL3VmhetmuX7Xj4O6+LHB+V0NJAc8j 2s7y/FzOFl5OzF8GQxNFOHQ7YurzYWmntkDhm3A5Uv9f1Luej0gt50Up/DlZDsGwkfJv 2EcdRGakEdVO0WgCyCvVPYkpeoFKkH0LHDMVI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.148 with SMTP id f20mr233709wbt.35.1282243257226; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.168.73 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:40:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YRKnS9um1C2B9-7LTbt5d3B0IL4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or HDFS > committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases where we > wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of simplifying > the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common committers as precisely > the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce committers. > > Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1991-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 19 19:49:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80401 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 19:49:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 19:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 82599 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 19:49:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82462 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 19:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82454 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 19:49:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:49:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:49:12 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so2099124eyd.35 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:48:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=gPrjar46S7c97uif0KKDDLDl2RUKsfeRXrPonzdtl18=; b=PnHnEqZwHOWzf0y3X984s2790lrqMu1eC3mU7Pv7GeyDd4KfK2N1lXv6wbqklpES8A T+tgSyt+3K2uSYPdO9fNDiIXGxCRd0ub4cBHY6WMjUx9KMOMSaMbiaUiZn6RYTr5YxMf RNLVsam0PyGjyRpvjRGqSVSQMfQYXKCKmVydE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GFm3PNui9xVyXqZ7rSk79aNZpdzMLtJcOyncTLrRGSt5G30v5eDZ6YRUqfSQMeZYPr 4ZKNjN0kBoVWUpcK5dcpwXzJlHLhg4YRaxK0kDrYCw4FBiiYJqnDOBnIAXWyndQWlHYf 1szsZcsNXnSoLKgvzA9ehq+6acgB0PKncNzl0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.48.146 with SMTP id v18mr245894web.56.1282247332047; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.168.73 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:48:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:48:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tNOhdq6VfBPvxklG7LaHUIzlwZc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 IMO, a combined committer list is less messy given how we currently release where common+mr+hdfs are all bundled and released together. Corner cases like the one postulated by Nigel above are the less likely if contributors have access to all hadoop. I do not see how a combined contributor list could act as friction on the ongoing break-up of the hadoop project -- something I'm in favor of -- nor get in the way of the development of distinct mr/hdfs user+dev communities; it seems to me that that project can progress independent of who can commit where. St.Ack On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? > > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. > > Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a > reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires > consensus. > > ---- > > Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the > Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers > (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. > As I'm reading it: > > A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. > A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. > A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or > Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual > appointments to Common continue. > A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to > HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. > > In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to > either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C > From general-return-1992-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 19 20:03:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84858 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 20:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 20:03:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 12519 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12463 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12455 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:03:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:03:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 84688 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 20:03:14 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.101]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:03:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:03:13 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/19/2010 12:48 PM, Stack wrote: > I do not see how a combined contributor list could act as friction on > the ongoing break-up of the hadoop project -- something I'm in favor > of -- nor get in the way of the development of distinct mr/hdfs > user+dev communities; it seems to me that that project can progress > independent of who can commit where. I agree. Many projects manage such things with trust, not with rigid ACLs. Some committers are trusted to commit just test code, some just documentation, and some deep implementation details in particular areas of the code. But should any committer wish to manage a release, or even commit a patch outside of their normal domain of expertise (if it's been reviewed by someone with expertise in that domain) they can. Over time they can gain trust in new areas of the project. In such projects, adding a committer merely implies that you trust someone not to overstep their abilities. If someone consistently suggests that patches are ready for commit which others feel are not, then they won't earn that trust and be invited to become a committer. Thus committership is not about deep technical abilities, but personal trust not to violate social contracts. Erecting walls within the community of trust via ACLs doesn't seem productive. Doug From general-return-1993-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 19 23:01:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66629 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 23:01:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 23:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 57651 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 23:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57575 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 23:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57567 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 23:01:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:01:06 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-67-180-80-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.80.11]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7F00IEJ98HDC00@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:00:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008190199 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-19_11:2010-08-19,2010-08-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:00:17 -0700 Message-id: <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/19/2010 12:48 PM, Stack wrote: >> I do not see how a combined contributor list could act as friction on >> the ongoing break-up of the hadoop project -- something I'm in favor >> of -- nor get in the way of the development of distinct mr/hdfs >> user+dev communities; it seems to me that that project can progress >> independent of who can commit where. > > I agree. > > Many projects manage such things with trust, not with rigid ACLs. Some committers are trusted to commit just test code, some just documentation, and some deep implementation details in particular areas of the code. But should any committer wish to manage a release, or even commit a patch outside of their normal domain of expertise (if it's been reviewed by someone with expertise in that domain) they can. Over time they can gain trust in new areas of the project. In such projects, adding a committer merely implies that you trust someone not to overstep their abilities. If someone consistently suggests that patches are ready for commit which others feel are not, then they won't earn that trust and be invited to become a committer. Thus committership is not about deep technical abilities, but personal trust not to violate social contracts. Erecting walls within the community of trust via ACLs doesn't seem productive. > > Doug Agreed. Anyone want to reconsider their vote? From general-return-1994-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 00:51:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12518 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 00:51:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 00:51:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 28364 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 00:51:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28293 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28285 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:51:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:50:50 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7K0o3Dj044358 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:50:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Og7/nO8pWf3YQ/EMdyMT1TWVOe87agW1AhCh7yKB4FrJGBDxJTgA9Durfb6PlABc Message-ID: <4C6DD13B.1060805@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:50:03 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 0 My thinking is that while MR and HDFS are the same product, we can have joint committership. If split happens there is no reason to have common committers, like nobody is raising a question to merge e.g. tomcat and subversion committers. I think nobody does, but I don't know for sure of course. --Konstantin On 8/17/2010 3:15 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Per the discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/XkY > > Should HDFS and MapReduce committers lists be combined and all > subsequent committers on either of these two projects be granted karma > in the other? > > If the vote passes, current and future committers to MapReduce and > HDFS will gain commit rights in both projects. Commit rights to Common > are unaffected. > > Without bylaws, a 2/3 majority for a committer import seems like a > reasonable bar, given that adding an individual committer requires > consensus. > > ---- > > Owen has started a separate voting thread, proposing to define the > Common committer list as the union of HDFS and MapReduce committers > (vote A), so I tried to write this (vote B) so it would not conflict. > As I'm reading it: > > A passes, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on HDFS, MR, and Common. > A passes, B fails: One can become a committer on HDFS or MapReduce. > Commit to either implies commit on Common, only. > A fails, B passes: One can become a committer on HDFS, MapReduce, or > Common. Commit to to HDFS/MR implies converse, but individual > appointments to Common continue. > A fails, B fails: Committers continue to be appointed individually to > HDFS, MapReduce, and Common. > > In no scheme would commit rights to Common imply commit rights to > either HDFS or MapReduce, I guess. -C > From general-return-1995-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 05:08:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87332 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 05:08:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 05:08:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 34960 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 05:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34606 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 05:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34598 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 05:07:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:07:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:07:35 +0000 Received: by pwj2 with SMTP id 2so1449645pwj.35 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:07:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer :subject:references:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc; bh=PBVa5iHwf64NTJgJRkXfed2bYxbJIKtl3A0YgxXjFmk=; b=rpsMpPKOHIosy9nDMsuwhgeYBpt1DMamUIFeJEnFYkiVdqjyZbHv+bKZ/lfwbnj0Yn Rdl3Nbbbi7R7inyO6MGw2dgdQuchWPV9kK2RPBkeMx19JrrMD0WCcuKGODxdMvRs+gkd h86yKYcRDn3GM8ueilUx04G50PkjiyT0mS/84= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer:subject:references:message-id :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc; b=ikQrLgiOnlY8N2Ei4AfjbUp6uZkn4YSvR4Er9Jsdi4tm8NIc1A6FVn52uYXCsX+Qoy npV743A6AxAYYm0YLdpjC5w5pJybcp5N2POhSsp5hAS7dXTSLzYKjJ7fsze7DIzP1H/m 8SDC5nyW4R9iUrarVF4CUUi85DAfn52qxx19A= Received: by 10.142.108.1 with SMTP id g1mr723684wfc.108.1282280833945; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.51.171.77] ([166.205.139.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w31sm2692916wfd.8.2010.08.19.22.07.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:07:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Dhruba Borthakur To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> Message-Id: <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:07:02 -0700 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For the records, I am +1 on having a single set of committers for hdfs , mr and common. For me, all committers do not need to be equally good, or have to reach a grand bar; but rather I should trust that person to be a team player. Dhruba Sent from my iPhone On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> On 08/19/2010 12:48 PM, Stack wrote: >>> I do not see how a combined contributor list could act as >>> friction on >>> the ongoing break-up of the hadoop project -- something I'm in favor >>> of -- nor get in the way of the development of distinct mr/hdfs >>> user+dev communities; it seems to me that that project can progress >>> independent of who can commit where. >> >> I agree. >> >> Many projects manage such things with trust, not with rigid ACLs. >> Some committers are trusted to commit just test code, some just >> documentation, and some deep implementation details in particular >> areas of the code. But should any committer wish to manage a >> release, or even commit a patch outside of their normal domain of >> expertise (if it's been reviewed by someone with expertise in that >> domain) they can. Over time they can gain trust in new areas of >> the project. In such projects, adding a committer merely implies >> that you trust someone not to overstep their abilities. If someone >> consistently suggests that patches are ready for commit which >> others feel are not, then they won't earn that trust and be invited >> to become a committer. Thus committership is not about deep >> technical abilities, but personal trust not to violate social >> contracts. Erecting walls within the community of trust via ACLs >> doesn't seem productive. >> >> Doug > > Agreed. Anyone want to reconsider their vote? > From general-return-1996-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 21:38:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3374 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 21:38:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 21:38:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 29959 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:38:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29693 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:38:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29685 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:38:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:38:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:38:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 3250 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:38:15 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:38:15 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so1236883iwn.35 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.30.193 with SMTP id v1mr2236748ibc.87.1282340294314; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:38:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1: Tom, Doug, Nigel, Stack, Dhruba, (Eli) -1: Owen, Arun, Hemanth, Nicholas +/-0: Konstantin, (Steve) The vote did not pass. Thanks to everyone who voted. -C From general-return-1997-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 21:43:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4195 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 21:43:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 21:43:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 39897 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:43:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39807 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39799 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:43:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:43:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:43:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 4138 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:42:47 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:42:47 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so1243023iwn.35 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.69 with SMTP id s5mr643914ibs.38.1282340566759; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:42:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry, I missed (Cos, +1) in my count, but the outcome is unchanged. -C On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > +1: Tom, Doug, Nigel, Stack, Dhruba, (Eli) > -1: Owen, Arun, Hemanth, Nicholas > +/-0: Konstantin, (Steve) > > The vote did not pass. > > Thanks to everyone who voted. -C > From general-return-1998-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 21:47:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6095 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 21:47:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 21:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 45434 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45335 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45327 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:47:22 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:47:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:47:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 6042 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:46:43 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:46:43 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so1247648iwn.35 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:46:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.204 with SMTP id cd12mr2225735ibb.101.1282340802834; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.171.75 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:46:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:46:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1: Owen, Arun, Doug, Nigel, Hemanth, Chris, Tom, Nicholas, Konstantin, Stack, (Jakob), (Cos), (Daniel) The vote passes. Thanks to everyone who voted. -C From general-return-1999-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 20 21:53:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7858 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 21:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 21:53:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 54021 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:53:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53973 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 21:53:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53965 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 21:53:23 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:53:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:53:00 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so3915475bwz.35 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.12 with SMTP id f12mr1114277bkg.212.1282341159855; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:52:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:52:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris, Didn't you vote +1 too? (If I recall correctly from the discussion.) Tom On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Sorry, I missed (Cos, +1) in my count, but the outcome is unchanged. -C > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> +1: Tom, Doug, Nigel, Stack, Dhruba, (Eli) >> -1: Owen, Arun, Hemanth, Nicholas >> +/-0: Konstantin, (Steve) >> >> The vote did not pass. >> >> Thanks to everyone who voted. -C >> > From general-return-2000-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 21 00:07:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53838 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2010 00:07:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2010 00:07:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 60283 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:07:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60159 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:07:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60151 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 00:07:52 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:07:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of athusoo@facebook.com designates 69.63.178.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.178.168] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.178.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:07:30 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.125] ([10.18.255.125:21884] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta008.snc1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id DD/76-01699-DA81F6C4; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:07:09 -0700 Received: from SC-MBX03.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.2.176]) by sc-hub03.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::1cfe:1f6b:8b35:cf7f%11]) with mapi; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:55 -0700 From: Ashish Thusoo To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [DISCUSS] Hive as TLP Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hive as TLP Thread-Index: ActAxJyTtS6qs0fBTd2lo41dVEUXsA== Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:05:49 +0000 Message-ID: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C1040379C139@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hive subproject has voted to become a TLP http://bit.ly/9nb4nN Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns on this? I will be= calling a more formal vote after this discussion. The Hive dev community is still dominated by Facebook but the community is = working hard to diversify the base and hopes to add committers from Yahoo a= nd Cloudera. We anticipate that we will have a more diversified base by the= end of the year modulo contributions from developers at these entities - a= nd there are a fair bit in the pipeline. Thanks, Ashish From general-return-2001-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 21 00:38:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68550 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2010 00:38:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2010 00:38:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 74802 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:38:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74739 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74731 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 00:38:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:38:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:37:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 68517 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 00:37:27 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:37:27 +0000 Received: by ywg4 with SMTP id 4so2054493ywg.35 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:37:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.202.6 with SMTP id z6mr1995202ybf.290.1282351044092; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.184.5 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:37:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:37:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Tom White wrote: > Chris, > > Didn't you vote +1 too? (If I recall correctly from the discussion.) At the start of the discussion I was leaning toward a +1, but elected to abstain from the vote as I read the responses. I didn't add an explicit +/-0, as I'd already added all the content I had in the discussion thread, and would only repeat myself. Since you ask: Vinod's point, i.e. "Where are the HDFS + MR issues?" gave me pause. There really aren't that many. The only exception I can think of are the RAID JIRAs, which aren't MR issues. Removing contrib is a better fix. The projects really are separating, and I expect this will become clearer as we cut more releases. If not, we should revisit this topic. After these votes, "Hadoop committers" are defined as PMC members, or contributors who independently earn commit status in both projects. Most members of the current PMC required about two years of full-time work in Hadoop before they were added. That's unusually steep, and the reason I didn't vote -1. There's a lack of data that makes this ambivalence hard to resolve. The arguments in favor are too abstract (trust, coherency, etc.) to make a definitive statements about the cost of separate lists. Examples of the form, "I tried to do X, but was prevented and it caused a costly, bureaucratic detour that took N days to resolve" (as Vinod provided for lacking access to Common) are persuasive to me. Hypothetical contributors that might be prevented from trying something are compelling, but less so. I'd like to get more experience working and releasing before I vote one way or the other. -C From general-return-2002-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 21 00:58:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70249 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2010 00:58:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2010 00:58:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 84576 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:58:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84527 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 00:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84496 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 00:58:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:58:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:58:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 70167 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 00:57:42 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:57:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4C6F2485.9000509@apache.org> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:57:41 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Ashish Thusoo , "hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hive as TLP References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C1040379C139@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C1040379C139@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hive seems a distinct developer community from Hadoop and thus deserves to be a separate project. It has made releases and appears to have met the requirements expected of a TLP. 3+ organizations are represented on its PMC, so while diversity is a concern, there seems to be a will to address this going forward, so I feel a detour through the Incubator is not required. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator Doug On 08/20/2010 05:05 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > The Hive subproject has voted to become a TLP > > http://bit.ly/9nb4nN > > Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns on this? I will be calling a more formal vote after this discussion. > > The Hive dev community is still dominated by Facebook but the community is working hard to diversify the base and hopes to add committers from Yahoo and Cloudera. We anticipate that we will have a more diversified base by the end of the year modulo contributions from developers at these entities - and there are a fair bit in the pipeline. > > Thanks, > Ashish From general-return-2003-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Aug 21 15:42:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43067 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2010 15:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2010 15:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 83450 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 15:42:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83289 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2010 15:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83270 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2010 15:42:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:42:08 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so4542558bwz.35 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:41:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.51.67 with SMTP id c3mr2074463bkg.69.1282405308341; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C6D8E01.6070005@apache.org> <40952204-AE73-4E5E-97CC-7BAAB3374C9D@mac.com> <32A3FA21-69A1-4B2F-9F7F-DBF0473BD1B5@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 08:41:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Combine MapReduce/HDFS Committers From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for sharing this, Chris. Cheers, Tom On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Tom White wrote: >> Chris, >> >> Didn't you vote +1 too? (If I recall correctly from the discussion.) > > At the start of the discussion I was leaning toward a +1, but elected > to abstain from the vote as I read the responses. I didn't add an > explicit +/-0, as I'd already added all the content I had in the > discussion thread, and would only repeat myself. Since you ask: > > Vinod's point, i.e. "Where are the HDFS + MR issues?" gave me pause. > There really aren't that many. The only exception I can think of are > the RAID JIRAs, which aren't MR issues. Removing contrib is a better > fix. The projects really are separating, and I expect this will become > clearer as we cut more releases. If not, we should revisit this topic. > > After these votes, "Hadoop committers" are defined as PMC members, or > contributors who independently earn commit status in both projects. > Most members of the current PMC required about two years of full-time > work in Hadoop before they were added. That's unusually steep, and the > reason I didn't vote -1. > > There's a lack of data that makes this ambivalence hard to resolve. > The arguments in favor are too abstract (trust, coherency, etc.) to > make a definitive statements about the cost of separate lists. > Examples of the form, "I tried to do X, but was prevented and it > caused a costly, bureaucratic detour that took N days to resolve" (as > Vinod provided for lacking access to Common) are persuasive to me. > Hypothetical contributors that might be prevented from trying > something are compelling, but less so. I'd like to get more experience > working and releasing before I vote one way or the other. -C > From general-return-2004-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 17:39:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36771 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 17:39:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 17:39:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 35500 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 17:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35389 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 17:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35247 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 17:39:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:38:58 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7NHcPif038227 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=dH7T1KYCeRkX2ZczbZuwE/c0UJuq7Awj8u3S/tC8M+Lkm1zs4UoAX4NNr9VBacXL Message-Id: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:38:12 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: Establish the Apache Pig Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to parallel analysis of large data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pig Project: * Benjamin Reed * Daniel Dai * Alan Gates * Giridharen Kesavan * Olga Natkovich * Pradeep Kamath * Santhosh Srinivasan * Yan Zhou * Jeff Zhang * Ashutosh Chauhan * Richard Ding * Dmitriy Ryaboy * Thejas Nair NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Pig Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-2005-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 21:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58896 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 21:41:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 21:41:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 23479 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 21:41:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23397 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23389 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:41:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:40:52 +0000 Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xuTY1e0021ZMdJ4ADxgWuG; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:40:30 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xxgM1e0082SbwD58cxgPgy; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:40:28 +0000 Message-Id: <635760BB-1E76-44D5-A363-71EBB1F0CF57@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers? Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:40:20 -0700 References: <7962BB4E-7176-44EB-A708-64881639E2AF@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 20, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > The vote passes. Ok, I've removed the common committer list and replaced it with the union of the HDFS and MapReduce committer lists. -- Owen From general-return-2006-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 22:19:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78166 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 22:19:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 22:19:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 65846 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65090 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65051 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:19:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:19:35 +0000 Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xp661e0031eYJf8ADyKFEk; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:19:15 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xyK61e0092SbwD501yK81p; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:19:13 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:19:06 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I'd like to get started testing 0.22. I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two weeks each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the mini-branches and every two weeks, the base of the branch will be moved to the head of trunk. This will allow QA to test a point in time (possibly with required bug fixes) with requiring development to continually maintain two branches. To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. Are there any concerns? -- Owen From general-return-2007-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 22:27:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82291 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 22:27:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 74909 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74643 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74635 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:27:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:27:14 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=ueaPg+TSWNqVAEVhUS+CXU99sTMVV5o+g/UDpnSiTOuso3dJPjSDh41W bdx8flBfOvBRxGHP4urUe+bE2vnUVklVDEt3M8X1XkJJuyb34O6k4W2Pz WNtuUikEOx2qxCh; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1282602434; x=1314138434; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Branching=20and=20testing=20strategy=20 for=200.22|Date:=20Mon,=2023=20Aug=202010=2022:26:53=20+0 000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<033b2c8e-989c-488f-bce2-21cc95ff0e59> |In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=Plm0ZBcRKz2HOmZeIn2kEhUhiyvMELOShf48w4FliLs=; b=fGX8y9IKqdlhK0ttQKDMxrBkaEvtn9p4NoeN8nJzQy8VFgHeOIi3a3Tr o+yT8BqBKIlrxGqmV483/4bvj8jiRIZLpaNZtHIJNyYbhAoLPC1FBXABz eP/zDsUBrhhMqSt; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,259,1280732400"; d="scan'208";a="14420384" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:26:54 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Thread-Topic: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Thread-Index: AQHLQxFL8Ew1bFLlK0iEzfCmE7PZ1ZLwE8iA Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:26:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <033b2c8e-989c-488f-bce2-21cc95ff0e59> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Are there any concerns? Just that 0.21 isn't even out of RC yet and that patches to fix it may get = missed. From general-return-2008-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 22:27:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82426 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 22:27:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 76980 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76903 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76895 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 22:27:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:27:25 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so8182101vws.35 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.124.211 with SMTP id v19mr3560424vcr.184.1282602424321; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.96.141 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:26:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:26:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed782ae3cf69048e8525ca --001636ed782ae3cf69048e8525ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Would it be worthwhile to give branches unique, persistent names? branch-0.22-qa1, branch-0.22-qa2, etc. Then problems in a later incarnation of the QA branch could be regression-tested against the previous one. Your point about automated builds is, however, noted. If this were git, branch-0.22 could be a "floating" branch which is aliased with the most recent qa branch name. Can we do something similar with svn? We could remove all the QA branches when we officially cut for RC, if you're concerned about clutter. - Aaron On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to get started testing 0.22. > > I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be > snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two weeks > each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the > mini-branches and every two weeks, the base of the branch will be moved to > the head of trunk. This will allow QA to test a point in time (possibly with > required bug fixes) with requiring development to continually maintain two > branches. > > To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of > "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. > > Are there any concerns? > > -- Owen > --001636ed782ae3cf69048e8525ca-- From general-return-2009-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 22:58:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87633 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 22:58:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 22:58:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 5325 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5259 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 22:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5238 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 22:58:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:58:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 87503 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.104]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:58:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4C72FD03.7070309@apache.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:58:11 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/23/2010 03:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of > "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. > > Are there any concerns? Since this will be used differently than what we've in the past named 'branch-${version}", perhaps we should name it differently too, e.g., "qa-0.22" or "test-0.22". Also, since this is branched from trunk, it might just be called 'trunk-checkpoint' or somesuch rather than any particular version. Doug From general-return-2010-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 23:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97777 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 23:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 23:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 27150 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 23:17:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26958 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 23:17:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26950 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 23:17:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:17:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:17:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c184.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.184]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7NNH51X058646 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:17:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-organization:user-agent; b=2JB/DvsyiDVoTTbC7quMuYz2gpFCgtaKJIqMtNbRTFFYJx1GkrWm+sEZj5Gehxjo Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:17:05 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Message-ID: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a sequential builds =66rom the trunk (as it usually done)? Say: - build qa1 is cut - QA works on it and finds issues - issues are reported against build qa1 - dev fixes some issues and mark them appropriately - build qa2 is cut - QA verifies that all issues from qa1 marked as 'fixed in qa2' are fixed = and keep going with their usual cycle. Is there anything wrong with that model? It also eliminates the need to maintain two branches at the same time. Cos On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to get started testing 0.22. >=20 > I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be =20 > snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two = =20 > weeks each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the = =20 > mini-branches and every two weeks, the base of the branch will be =20 > moved to the head of trunk. This will allow QA to test a point in time = =20 > (possibly with required bug fixes) with requiring development to =20 > continually maintain two branches. >=20 > To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of =20 > "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. >=20 > Are there any concerns? >=20 > -- Owen --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkxzAXEACgkQMqXifkwDoaF0jwD/Q2sLFVldm+crAiZKSMRAdwCW RSWC5c93paDMyi06w9oA/iwYo2YmOo45JQbBXHWubXrzBdPeO4yPENuiZ7x6RTVi =Nzff -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From general-return-2011-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 23 23:35:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4780 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2010 23:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2010 23:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 48144 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48078 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48070 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:35:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.16] (HELO qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:35:30 +0000 Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xskp1e0030vp7WLA1zb8bd; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:35:08 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xzaz1e0072SbwD58Rzb21A; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:35:06 +0000 Message-Id: <38F76180-6DC0-4E1C-88C7-2D4C54539D5B@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:34:59 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Would it be worthwhile to give branches unique, persistent names? I don't think so. Of course the old branches will always be there under the old revision. But it will be convenient to be able to do "svn up" on the given branch and have it track the current qa branch without worrying about what the "current" index is and doing a svn switch to the new url. > branch-0.22-qa1, branch-0.22-qa2, etc. Then problems in a later > incarnation > of the QA branch could be regression-tested against the previous one. These are not intended to be long lived. In particular, any comparison testing will be done with the generated artifacts, not the source repository. > Your point about automated builds is, however, noted. If this were > git, > branch-0.22 could be a "floating" branch which is aliased with the > most > recent qa branch name. Can we do something similar with svn? I don't think so, since branches in subversion act like copies rather than markers. -- Owen From general-return-2012-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 00:28:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29175 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 00:28:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 00:28:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 78135 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 00:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78065 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 00:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78057 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 00:28:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:28:08 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7O0REZn088557 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:27:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=gmuHD/T0G3zth/n4brO0w3BLIdkU4LJ1GqgTQcIOhIPmXTy9TtmmGidKU90fz8yr Message-Id: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:27:14 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Even with the work on hadoop-0.22 (trunk) starting in earnest it is fairly obvious, given our past history, that it will take a while for us to get it stable and deployable - for e.g. it took us nearly 6 months to deploy hadoop-0.20. In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security release off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop- common). This will ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for over 12 months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until hadoop-0.22 which has all of these patches. Some salient aspects: a) Full-fledged security implementation deployed at scale (4000 nodes) in production. b) Lots of work on the stabilizing and optimizing the NameNode and JobTracker for over 12 months. This has been critical in deploying Hadoop at scale i.e. clusters of 4000 nodes. For e.g. we have a 50% improvement in CPU utilization on the JobTracker vis-a-vis the hadoop-0.20.2 release. c) Several new features in the scheduler (CapacityScheduler), Map- Reduce framework, better support for multi-tenancy etc. d) Several performance and stability improvements to the system e.g. iterative ls, robustness against rogue clients/jobs/users etc. Also, given the huge number of features and enhancements I'd like to propose we create a new 0.20-security branch and commit the Yahoo patchset there for the release. This has been proposed earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concerns about the effect this would have on development on trunk. However, I believe, we have a case for demonstrable progress on trunk now, and it would be useful to have an interim, fully-tested Apache Hadoop release available to the community. Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release soon after. At this point a Hadoop Security release alone would add tremendous value for the reasons above. Presently we would like to get this release out quickly to focus the majority of our efforts on trunk. Thoughts? Arun From general-return-2013-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 03:54:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92610 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 03:54:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 03:54:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 97681 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 03:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97306 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 03:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97298 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 03:54:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:54:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:54:29 +0000 Received: from [10.66.72.163] (sightbusy-lx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.72.163]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7O3rkW7011104 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:53:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sovV/KcrJX6C1gZZAetjmcYOajwVTsBcmNkBeEr1wdzQ7b19O/+4wyaTesZeDBgR Message-ID: <4C734249.1060102@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:23:45 +0530 From: Vinod KV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 References: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> In-Reply-To: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My first thought was also inline with Cos's. Any background we are missing about this? +vinod On Tuesday 24 August 2010 04:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a sequential builds > from the trunk (as it usually done)? Say: > - build qa1 is cut > - QA works on it and finds issues > - issues are reported against build qa1 > - dev fixes some issues and mark them appropriately > - build qa2 is cut > - QA verifies that all issues from qa1 marked as 'fixed in qa2' are fixed and > keep going with their usual cycle. > > Is there anything wrong with that model? It also eliminates the need to > maintain two branches at the same time. > > Cos > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> I'd like to get started testing 0.22. >> >> I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be >> snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two >> weeks each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the >> mini-branches and every two weeks, the base of the branch will be >> moved to the head of trunk. This will allow QA to test a point in time >> (possibly with required bug fixes) with requiring development to >> continually maintain two branches. >> >> To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of >> "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. >> >> Are there any concerns? >> >> -- Owen >> From general-return-2014-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 07:08:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62954 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 07:08:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 07:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 21765 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 07:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21233 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 07:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21212 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 07:08:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:08:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.227] (HELO qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:08:29 +0000 Received: from omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id y72g1e0010QkzPwAC789zQ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:08:09 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id y7881e0011GAoR68N788wA; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:08:08 +0000 Message-Id: <115EFBD4-93A6-4388-9F72-D6E6E6693E0E@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:08:07 -0700 References: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a > sequential builds > from the trunk (as it usually done)? For QA to be effective, they can't handle a different artifact every day with a new set of features. So the plan is to take a snapshot and test that. However, if bugs are found that block testing they need precisely those bugs fixed with out any additional features. So you need branches to support that. So a sample cycle would look like: 1. create build-1 and test it, discovering bugs B1, B2, and B3. Only B1 is blocking further testing. 2. meanwhile, someone has checked in feature F1 into trunk 3. B1 is fixed in the branch and trunk. B2 and B3 are just fixed in trunk 4. when build-2 is built it only has B1's fix 5. at the end of the cycle, we rebase the branch to trunk and pickup B1, B2, B3 and F1 into build-3. If you don't have a branch, you would get F1 whether you want it or not. -- Owen From general-return-2015-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 09:45:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18300 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 09:45:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 09:45:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 4044 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 09:45:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3628 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 09:45:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3603 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 09:45:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:45:05 +0000 Received: from [84.72.85.88] (helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Onppv-0002IQ-Bg; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:30:31 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: apache commons configuration Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:43:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> Hi, just out of curiosity: Is there any particular reason, why Hadoop projects or ZooKeeper do not use apache commons configuration[1]? I'm just evaluating it for an internal project. Would you recommend it or not? I imagine, that it could help to make projects configurable either via XML or INI files. Some people may prefer one or the other. [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/ Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-2016-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 10:25:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34106 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 10:25:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 10:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 44910 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 10:25:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44517 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 10:25:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44509 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 10:25:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:25:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:24:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5321BA4E3 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:24:32 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gk2sjMpgmtCA for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:24:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897851BA4C1 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:24:31 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1283250258.54731@S/aHiNjA678sqbf6f7FTDg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7OAOHLh016998 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:24:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:24:16 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: apache commons configuration References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7OAOHLh016998 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 24/08/10 10:43, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > just out of curiosity: Is there any particular reason, why Hadoop projects or > ZooKeeper do not use apache commons configuration[1]? > I'm just evaluating it for an internal project. Would you recommend it or not? > I imagine, that it could help to make projects configurable either via XML or > INI files. Some people may prefer one or the other. > > [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/ Someone's discussed it, I'm against because (a) there's a lot of historical configuration stuff in there, (b) ini files are less flexible than XML, (c) neither of them are very dynamic. when the NN goes down and you want the DNs to reconnect to a different host, how do you do that when all data is read at start time? From general-return-2017-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 16:40:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5683 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 16:40:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 16:40:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 37376 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 16:40:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37275 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 16:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37267 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 16:40:49 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:40:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.138 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.138] (HELO e8.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:40:24 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7OGMBhX020205 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:22:11 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o7OGe235088334 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:40:03 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o7OGe04q002138 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:40:00 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o7OGdx5F002089 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:39:59 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: August Austin Hadoop User Group Meeting X-KeepSent: 3950A1AF:08B70263-86257789:005B515F; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:39:58 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP2|March 17, 2010) at 08/24/2010 10:39:59, Serialize complete at 08/24/2010 10:39:59 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005B8D5186257789_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 005B8D5186257789_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks For those in the Austin, Texas area we'll be meeting again this Thursday evening (8/26). Karmasphere and Pentaho will be presenting and I'll also be giving a quick introduction to Hadoop for all the new attendees before we begin. Full details are available here - http://austinhug.blogspot.com/2010/08/august-meeting-826.html Regards Steve Watt From: Steve Loughran To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: 08/24/2010 05:25 AM Subject: Re: apache commons configuration On 24/08/10 10:43, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > just out of curiosity: Is there any particular reason, why Hadoop projects or > ZooKeeper do not use apache commons configuration[1]? > I'm just evaluating it for an internal project. Would you recommend it or not? > I imagine, that it could help to make projects configurable either via XML or > INI files. Some people may prefer one or the other. > > [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/ Someone's discussed it, I'm against because (a) there's a lot of historical configuration stuff in there, (b) ini files are less flexible than XML, (c) neither of them are very dynamic. when the NN goes down and you want the DNs to reconnect to a different host, how do you do that when all data is read at start time? --=_alternative 005B8D5186257789_=-- From general-return-2018-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 16:50:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8036 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 16:50:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 16:50:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 51951 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 16:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51840 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 16:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51832 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 16:50:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.142] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:50:13 +0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7OGZZO8027048 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:35:35 -0400 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o7OGnq0D102508 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:49:52 -0400 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o7OGnpj8003693 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:49:51 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o7OGnpUr003661 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:49:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: SXSW Interactive Big Data Panel Session - Community Votes required X-KeepSent: 064977E9:D8D1A29F-86257789:005BBA3A; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:49:50 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP2|March 17, 2010) at 08/24/2010 10:49:50, Serialize complete at 08/24/2010 10:49:50 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005C743086257789_=" --=_alternative 005C743086257789_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks 15,000 people attended SXSW Interactive last year. As such, a couple of folks from the Apache Hadoop and Cassandra community have joined up to put together a "Big Data for everyone" panel at SXSW next year. The intent is to proselytize both the Online and Offline Big Data stack (incl. HBase, Pig, Hive, etc.) to the as yet uninformed. There are no agendas here other than getting the word out and educating the audience. Acceptance to SXSW is partially democratic and community votes for the session greatly affect the outcome. If you have a few minutes, please sign up and vote for our panel. We'd really appreciate it. Voting closes on Friday. http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/ideas/view/7475 Regards Steve Watt --=_alternative 005C743086257789_=-- From general-return-2019-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 18:36:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59671 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 18:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 18:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10343 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:36:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10291 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:36:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10283 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 18:36:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:36:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:36:11 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7OIYa0N033306 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:34:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=qRzTjYTGC+67mBqt0yJ1aski85Y81a+PxSKiR110eGXDuJKcfEKvyVswta/RAWuq Received: from SP2-EX07VS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:34:36 -0700 From: Olga Natkovich To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:34:35 -0700 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Index: ActDtzub1vRonnzOS9u8A3TUrZJWPAAA41TQ Message-ID: References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 > From: Alan Gates > Date: August 23, 2010 10:38:12 AM PDT > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > Subject: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > From general-return-2020-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 18:38:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60322 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 18:38:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 18:38:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16535 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:38:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16483 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16475 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 18:38:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:38:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:38:42 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-67-180-80-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.80.11]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7O00E1S6F7OKA0@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:38:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008240117 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-24_10:2010-08-24,2010-08-24,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:38:08 -0700 Message-id: <74F969A5-B987-49EB-8547-9A1EAD165599@mac.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > From general-return-2021-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 18:48:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65149 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 18:48:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 18:48:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 39811 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:48:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39751 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 18:48:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39742 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 18:48:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:48:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:48:34 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7OIlDbc094603 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=YhD3PEI8Xz2d05V7ehO4n4xyZL4AW0iCNNbZLsqnq3DcRmscOeopuLhTYDRSzW+H Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.32]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:47:14 -0700 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:47:12 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Index: ActDu7B1GRWe+ZaaTK6akDtuuABldAAARLfr Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <74F969A5-B987-49EB-8547-9A1EAD165599@mac.com> Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1=20 Thanks mahadev On 8/24/10 11:38 AM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > +1 >=20 > On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: >=20 >> I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. >>=20 >> The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this >> proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active commi= tters >> (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of August 18 = 2010 >> should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should be the PMC cha= ir. >> They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among the first tasks of= the >> new PMC. Full details of the vote can be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl >>=20 >> Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. >>=20 >> Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: >>=20 >> Establish the Apache Pig Project >>=20 >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to parallel analysis of large >> data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. >>=20 >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be >> it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Pig Project: >>=20 >> * Benjamin Reed >> * Daniel Dai >> * Alan Gates >> * Giridharen Kesavan >> * Olga Natkovich >> * Pradeep Kamath >> * Santhosh Srinivasan >> * Yan Zhou >> * Jeff Zhang >> * Ashutosh Chauhan >> * Richard Ding >> * Dmitriy Ryaboy >> * Thejas Nair >>=20 >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache Pig Project; and be it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further >>=20 >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-2022-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 19:02:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70355 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 19:02:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 19:02:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 65576 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65512 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:02:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65504 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 19:02:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:02:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:02:50 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7OJ1KgY043032 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=wGaT/IBk17xw/oy7F9Du/IZvELjZScrQBuijS2u5ZUxGAEeD1oZ9lEr0mWkFJDeg Message-Id: <4ABE6BD0-39E7-404D-B093-1955733D3811@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:59:47 -0700 References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 Arun On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > From general-return-2023-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 19:11:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77677 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 19:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 19:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 82599 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82531 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82521 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 19:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:11:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 77543 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 19:11:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.106]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:11:01 +0000 Message-ID: <4C741944.1020907@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:11:00 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 Doug On 08/23/2010 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of > August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should > be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among > the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can be seen at > http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > From general-return-2024-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 19:13:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78580 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 19:13:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 19:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 84916 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:13:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84870 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84862 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 19:13:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:13:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of teamphy6@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:13:39 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so5941068iwn.35 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RPw494Zcg4y4eyhaxvXaTYSivvJbtRsXTo8Ww+Alr4Y=; b=BlfWGXpPhJ6n6aSs+XPCx6LPSX6geF5f+s/T/mdagBheUZXu7HF0zjAXMFcEcKvmAm cTMVvVh4x6WTxFYJXbTypHvCpS+EDfnGZcZylbReUZmn1AsLKdSg9imkdgiFASOR15YO 9aAbYMfzLjiND2m7/HRTOWeSd9SEP4rfMwVA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tDKH4gkyhfAiX79BpqdS9jog5ioXiOlHhj+AkoBMdmz2I/51/maFZGYX9iu6kGrWSO XGpZBRG/LdUrHfmXB/DOL0MbqwfFhth6sG8qj9F0+HQStIomJX0hqBn/415nx+aU3QVm 0VB7yQg5OsMDhGqw9I9x3bIlvx6TaxeqWVWzg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.141 with SMTP id h13mr8780073ibv.1.1282677198483; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.36.9 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:13:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C741944.1020907@apache.org> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <4C741944.1020907@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:13:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Daniel Jue To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +1 > > Doug > > On 08/23/2010 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: >> >> I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. >> >> The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this >> proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active >> committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of >> August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should >> be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among >> the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can be seen at >> http://bit.ly/c3GDyl >> >> Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. >> >> Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: >> >> Establish the Apache Pig Project >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to parallel analysis of large >> data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be >> it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Pig Project: >> >> * Benjamin Reed >> * Daniel Dai >> * Alan Gates >> * Giridharen Kesavan >> * Olga Natkovich >> * Pradeep Kamath >> * Santhosh Srinivasan >> * Yan Zhou >> * Jeff Zhang >> * Ashutosh Chauhan >> * Richard Ding >> * Dmitriy Ryaboy >> * Thejas Nair >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache Pig Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> >> >> >> > From general-return-2025-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 19:19:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80714 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 19:19:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 19:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 95557 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95462 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 19:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95442 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 19:19:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:19:19 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so9653bwz.35 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.113.209 with SMTP id b17mr5068020bkq.19.1282677538727; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 0.21.0 released From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user , common-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi everyone, I am pleased to announce that Apache Hadoop 0.21.0 is available for download from http://hadoop.apache.org/common/releases.html. Over 1300 issues have been addressed since 0.20.2; you can find details at http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html Please note that this release has not undergone testing at scale and should not be considered stable or suitable for production. It is being classified as a minor release, which means that it should be API compatible with 0.20.2. Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Tom From general-return-2026-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 20:03:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94633 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 20:03:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 20:03:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 54592 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:03:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54522 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:03:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54514 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 20:03:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:03:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:03:45 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so57835bwz.35 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.27.20 with SMTP id g20mr5076305bkc.114.1282680203541; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Tom On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. =A0In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of > August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should = be > the PMC chair. =A0They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among t= he > first tasks of the new PMC. =A0Full details of the vote can be seen at > http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" = be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the ch= air > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it furthe= r > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Daniel Dai =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Alan Gates =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Giridharen Kesavan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Olga Natkovich =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Pradeep Kamath =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Santhosh Srinivasan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Yan Zhou =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jeff Zhang =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ashutosh Chauhan =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Richard Ding =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Dmitriy Ryaboy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Thejas Nair =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovic= h > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificatio= n, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Ap= ache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apac= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2027-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 20:32:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9507 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 20:32:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 20:32:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 88799 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:32:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88748 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:32:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88740 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 20:32:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:32:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:31:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (wlanvpn-snve-247-55.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.149.55]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7OKVDFv074503 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:31:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-organization:user-agent; b=LJw1hx6WikqBKGw15I1OJINgD5LX0wJ2A9fYBdMwyPTEddJtXRyPX0/KnrwmSyID Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:31:13 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 Message-ID: <20100824203112.GE27700@wlanvpn-snve-247-55.corp.yahoo.com> References: <20100823231705.GB26339@goodenter-lm.local> <115EFBD4-93A6-4388-9F72-D6E6E6693E0E@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <115EFBD4-93A6-4388-9F72-D6E6E6693E0E@apache.org> X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As we have briefly discussed off-line I'll try to reiterate the assumptions you have expressed: - testing cycle on a qa branch won't be reset after a blocker (B1) is fixe= d. The validation is continued from the point where the B1 has been discovered. In the real cluster test env. it means that only fresh deployment needs to be done. - in some cases a judgment call has to be made on whether or not testing cycle needs to be reset (e.g. in cases of massive fixes and so on). The chances are, however, that critical fixes are usually isolated and don't affect the rest of the code base. It isn't like I disagree with the assumptions above. They are valid... under two conditions: - a test harness in use (i.e. a team of test engineers running on manual testing errand or an automated solution similar to Herriot) supports the notion of interrupted test cycle - there's a sound regression tests suite which can guarantee the a fix B2 doesn't invalidate fix B1 from before. Cos On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:08AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >=20 > > If I may... why QA need source code branches rather than a =20 > > sequential builds > > from the trunk (as it usually done)? >=20 > For QA to be effective, they can't handle a different artifact every =20 > day with a new set of features. So the plan is to take a snapshot and =20 > test that. However, if bugs are found that block testing they need =20 > precisely those bugs fixed with out any additional features. So you =20 > need branches to support that. So a sample cycle would look like: >=20 > 1. create build-1 and test it, discovering bugs B1, B2, and B3. Only =20 > B1 is blocking further testing. > 2. meanwhile, someone has checked in feature F1 into trunk > 3. B1 is fixed in the branch and trunk. B2 and B3 are just fixed in =20 > trunk > 4. when build-2 is built it only has B1's fix > 5. at the end of the cycle, we rebase the branch to trunk and pickup =20 > B1, B2, B3 and F1 into build-3. >=20 > If you don't have a branch, you would get F1 whether you want it or not. >=20 > -- Owen --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkx0LBAACgkQMqXifkwDoaHNuAD8Cei/kjJXhW1IN15koGg044Tf UoKLsei+ydMpiyAYBRkA/iSzK9vrO0hkOgCsS4T6ZcbKs7BbdfC3I0Nq8aVyrx4n =Q8j3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- From general-return-2028-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 20:49:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14571 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 20:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 20:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 6894 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:49:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6827 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 20:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6819 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 20:49:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:49:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of athusoo@facebook.com designates 69.63.184.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.184.102] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.184.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:49:19 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.134] ([10.18.255.134:4219] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta003.ash1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id AD/18-20904-A30347C4; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:48:59 -0700 Received: from SC-MBX03.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.2.176]) by sc-hub04.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::8df5:7f90:d4a0:bb9%11]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:48:57 -0700 From: Ashish Thusoo To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Thread-Index: AQHLQuoVKzGr9GIS4k+nEBDJK0qH/JLxflSA//+XWeA= Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:48:56 +0000 Message-ID: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037A5C47@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1 Ashish=20 -----Original Message----- From: Tom White [mailto:tom@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:03 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP +1 Tom On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this=20 > proposal. =A0In summary, the community voted that all current active=20 > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as=20 > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich=20 > should be the PMC chair. =A0They also agreed that adopting bylaws should= =20 > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. =A0Full details of the vote can= =20 > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" = be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the ch= air > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it furthe= r > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Daniel Dai =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Alan Gates =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Giridharen Kesavan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Olga Natkovich =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Pradeep Kamath =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Santhosh Srinivasan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Yan Zhou =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jeff Zhang =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ashutosh Chauhan =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Richard Ding =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Dmitriy Ryaboy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Thejas Nair =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovic= h > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificatio= n, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Ap= ache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apac= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2029-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 21:04:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18029 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 21:04:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 21:04:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 22420 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 21:04:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22367 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 21:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22359 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 21:04:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:04:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:04:46 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7OL2xss093502 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:02:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=mikU34/rmIfn8ZD2AN7UfTuO9J3a9ipkYaa0XbrqaHhc6XBuuTqUVUSBqqMCj1Rj Message-Id: <9A06CFFB-56BD-4E1B-A6C3-13A35C6B9447@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C1040379C139@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hive as TLP Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:02:58 -0700 References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C1040379C139@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I think this is a reasonable direction. Hive clearly has a strong user- base and is a distinct community. +1 Arun On Aug 20, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > The Hive subproject has voted to become a TLP > > http://bit.ly/9nb4nN > > Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns on this? I > will be calling a more formal vote after this discussion. > > The Hive dev community is still dominated by Facebook but the > community is working hard to diversify the base and hopes to add > committers from Yahoo and Cloudera. We anticipate that we will have > a more diversified base by the end of the year modulo contributions > from developers at these entities - and there are a fair bit in the > pipeline. > > Thanks, > Ashish From general-return-2030-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 22:18:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62851 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 22:18:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 22:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11659 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 22:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11580 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 22:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11572 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 22:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:18:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 62707 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 22:18:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:18:33 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so6157615iwn.35 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.172.75 with SMTP id k11mr9376616ibz.4.1282688311786; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.144.198 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 -C On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. =A0In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of > August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should = be > the PMC chair. =A0They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among t= he > first tasks of the new PMC. =A0Full details of the vote can be seen at > http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" = be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the ch= air > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it furthe= r > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Daniel Dai =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Alan Gates =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Giridharen Kesavan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Olga Natkovich =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Pradeep Kamath =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Santhosh Srinivasan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Yan Zhou =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jeff Zhang =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ashutosh Chauhan =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Richard Ding =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Dmitriy Ryaboy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Thejas Nair =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovic= h > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificatio= n, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Ap= ache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apac= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2031-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 23:36:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93453 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 23:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 23:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 96911 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:36:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96781 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:36:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96773 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 23:36:19 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:36:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:35:58 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so28010wwc.29 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E7MzQV2FOEZrDOIdoKp4YuxkO0ckoykHbq+HjHZc6zU=; b=Bbyx+OvWWMBlJCqAJGLRi/nlekx7+cxLuJBuwJrElq1tZ+wueOPs2PHOm3DFc+QdKo KSWOA35XoeYp3jvtGXVl7GU0JTFVURYr4dDBB1sC3/d6eY9PkPWIO0b7hqvipCMBVM6+ Dx4uzNVJKhh9dvI/sh7T9EqD0pXiduGk008XU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=l9VKiOJpxOI93oOsQJijoFIv+Zg+LFyzOqcf2kFop3MU0s/Tii2G9m8nmRL1pGLEiI 6otf9qStOOQatfQcLUO4laHz90l3NSjTfeh/RogjbKFOLPg9DhA/3fHhDeWb+YmZg0i+ Sc0TkTZUtly8JkA8bm0vqA6LNpiBRIzSihyno= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.67 with SMTP id v3mr6471973wbw.147.1282692937604; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.131.24 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:35:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:35:37 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FJFDyuFotVqUbJpe_n4rrmSaeqw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Sounds like good idea to me. St.Ack On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. =A0In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of > August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should = be > the PMC chair. =A0They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among t= he > first tasks of the new PMC. =A0Full details of the vote can be seen at > http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" = be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the ch= air > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it furthe= r > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Daniel Dai =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Alan Gates =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Giridharen Kesavan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Olga Natkovich =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Pradeep Kamath =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Santhosh Srinivasan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Yan Zhou =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jeff Zhang =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ashutosh Chauhan =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Richard Ding =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Dmitriy Ryaboy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Thejas Nair =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovic= h > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificatio= n, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Ap= ache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apac= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2032-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 23:38:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94903 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 23:38:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 23:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 324 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 251 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 243 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 23:38:52 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:38:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daijyc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:38:31 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so259353bwz.35 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=igPJguAZLrVqVwYIZaoC75vxFva3qIsozzvY8/P/S6I=; b=Y2vQhx3MXp6+mxsOJmteTJCh3DIFOwvlPRu2qzWyxQUB2vPPyfY1JzkZppS5B0dUr0 qqNQ1BsUA0qsKz6T+0EbS2wTM1gGF/QeoXmB4HfOerVQuSVtKwOeY8vhmhRhRPwA03i9 K3ZiMzYYR9R+hqLzwIfWEi85webST3Mwx8DUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rIgOZZoJW4PKT2Yah24hwj6v78Owjz448AOfp4Q2vPL9jxAslUV7gCmhDAy1+HE+6R oIba6UHTQFrmYmWB9rBOb5djGZAWWJOxtlPPRT+mf/AwBe9ghPD6gChEuPOLQap0JDwN cUDOA77LpGe7zEu4LFGw0tXPkHhkz+20xsgng= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.57.9 with SMTP id a9mr5303311bkh.104.1282693090497; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.177.206 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Daniel Dai To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b0d703d349048e9a4276 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b0d703d349048e9a4276 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > +1 > > > From: Alan Gates > > Date: August 23, 2010 10:38:12 AM PDT > > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > Subject: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP > > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > > > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > Foundation; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > > it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Pig Project: > > > > * Benjamin Reed > > * Daniel Dai > > * Alan Gates > > * Giridharen Kesavan > > * Olga Natkovich > > * Pradeep Kamath > > * Santhosh Srinivasan > > * Yan Zhou > > * Jeff Zhang > > * Ashutosh Chauhan > > * Richard Ding > > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > > * Thejas Nair > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > > encourage open development and increased participation in the > > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > --001636c5b0d703d349048e9a4276-- From general-return-2033-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 24 23:40:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95072 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 23:40:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 23:40:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 2327 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2280 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2010 23:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2272 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2010 23:40:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:40:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:39:52 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7ONclm6095687 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=mIdwmcYdXsfBDw/CpNPzxSZmuWTGFjjlBekkPWUEuuLlLYEnbuzG7h/RPxQAO4BJ Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:08:47 +0530 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:08:46 +0530 Subject: hudson patch test jobs : hadoop pig and zookeeper Thread-Topic: hudson patch test jobs : hadoop pig and zookeeper Thread-Index: ActD5X9SSlsAmr/VSnWlyVrES9koHg== Message-ID: <155916E3-8F8D-4EF7-8992-4C6E3382D241@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, We have a new hudson master hudson.apache.org and hudson.zones.apache.org i= s retired. This means that we need to port all our patch test admin jobs for hadoop(co= mmon,hdfs,mapred), pig and zookeeper to the new hudson master. I'm working on configuring patch admin jobs with the new hudson master: hud= son.apache.org. (this is exactly the reason for why the patch test builds a= re not running at the moment) Thanks Giri = From general-return-2034-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 00:17:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9194 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 00:17:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 00:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 46265 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 00:17:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46166 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 00:17:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46158 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 00:17:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:17:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:17:11 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7P0G0ix065931 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=inGukrR+cUkSp8R0nFIOI8QH3unB/k6h+2bJBngMc2xIkAYNUzUn+JNdYgkFkh6o Message-ID: <4C7460C0.4010004@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:16:00 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 hereby pursuant to proposal --Konstantin On 8/23/2010 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2035-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 03:37:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72952 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 03:37:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 03:37:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 63706 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 03:37:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62954 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 03:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62924 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 03:37:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:37:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:37:15 +0000 Received: from [10.66.72.163] (sightbusy-lx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.72.163]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7P3ZYv3020015; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:35:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UJfmhOEVUG5J5xwASJKJzNnuzimw7aCZVtKN1uIqw4zQ3IpjwIjNXQd/yBle+Wzh Message-ID: <4C748F85.3000202@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:05:33 +0530 From: Vinod KV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Tom White , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , common-user Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 0.21.0 released References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the great work leading this effort, Tom! +Vinod On Wednesday 25 August 2010 12:48 AM, Tom White wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am pleased to announce that Apache Hadoop 0.21.0 is available for > download from http://hadoop.apache.org/common/releases.html. > > Over 1300 issues have been addressed since 0.20.2; you can find details at > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html > http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html > http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.21.0/releasenotes.html > > Please note that this release has not undergone testing at scale and > should not be considered stable or suitable for production. It is > being classified as a minor release, which means that it should be API > compatible with 0.20.2. > > Thanks to all who contributed to this release! > > Tom > > From general-return-2036-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 07:16:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42073 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 07:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 07:16:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 83405 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 07:16:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82918 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 07:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82910 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 07:16:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.237.91] (HELO n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com) (68.142.237.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:16:43 +0000 Received: from [68.142.237.87] by n6.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 07:16:21 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.152] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 07:16:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp205.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 07:16:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 848134.41578.bm@omp205.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57132 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Aug 2010 07:16:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282720581; bh=71hQJ796zWjYEC0c5CgvpfNLjePIE9QPvGksrL35V1M=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zkUGn6HYrBkMZe9ckmaJUUwo0qJdlSiVGL+M6vjqIRhs5o0qisNE7xyFJg6AL1rDSszMN427l9P+IplEl+kmfmieasEErylNWD08zQduzPxlZh4cY7UXZX3pughsMLEDl4U5ga4WgSysSqD99yOk7Ozwp0H7JsM300dFkeqETnM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TGX1dIGyrVS0IllNqoqn62ynJERMJParGlngK4ddRVi8rczh4EqLru0LmeRcxJ8Al7hOEeYrQJeferTGE3ZTiOgHwOgEs+tWQiEpOEQiCGX4YYkzBq0aembNUWV5MLK3RXRPkM8jOD5XZYtuwmApFPfEP59wngvE1UKYkyRIbc8=; Message-ID: <700422.56791.qm@web56604.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Ay3naMkVM1l_.hHM_V.Pq_GuLbR7rdQXWNpiRlOZSpJeXFZ CM1TJzqv2DWIz2mbp.p9UtkvOFN0wVfXZC593kSCi2m1emaTIJ41fAGovCJp 03OSFATvvLwnHpUU002FlBETp0P0AN.xscV2sXlREb2RUZ2qTyKfF_FSF2gh KnRIcfu3bhDqLXhyl64BBI3dSzxO3CoEuGS83L6UAXtLWHontxGSVlu_YuAp tR93D3rveE9BTcSEQeOWYWNjH79NxDU0wCTNdRcUt9vr2KJn88huzpZ.dD8k HX4CUZZ2uJ_o5jBGiCcg_pnY_4Ca0ttR3lsvxogKyipq3Dyck1BP2ViiArhE - Received: from [89.212.72.108] by web56604.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:16:21 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:16:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Oleg V. Zhylin" Subject: Documentation suggestion: Quick start To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All, The Quick Start page http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/quickstart.html contains a suggestion on how to ssh to localhost w/o a passphrase Now check that you can ssh to the localhost without a passphrase: $ ssh localhost If you cannot ssh to localhost without a passphrase, execute the following commands: $ ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa $ cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys I suggest adding a third command to to the snipped $ chmod 600 ~/.ssh/authorized_keys Otherwise the number of users who wants a quick start and run into an ssh issue like one described in http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/ssh-to-localhost-without-password-802067/ will grow on. WBR Oleg V. Zhylin ovz@yahoo.com From general-return-2037-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 08:35:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67407 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 08:35:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 08:35:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 55996 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 08:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55443 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 08:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55434 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 08:35:03 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:35:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:34:40 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so466838wyf.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:34:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.135 with SMTP id a7mr519731wen.39.1282725259226; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.166.4 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:34:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:34:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: apache commons configuration From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a09286bae0c048ea1bfe8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65a09286bae0c048ea1bfe8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For some recent discussion, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6910 On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 24/08/10 10:43, Thomas Koch wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just out of curiosity: Is there any particular reason, why Hadoop projects >> or >> ZooKeeper do not use apache commons configuration[1]? >> I'm just evaluating it for an internal project. Would you recommend it or >> not? >> I imagine, that it could help to make projects configurable either via XML >> or >> INI files. Some people may prefer one or the other. >> >> [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/ >> > > Someone's discussed it, I'm against because (a) there's a lot of historical > configuration stuff in there, (b) ini files are less flexible than XML, (c) > neither of them are very dynamic. when the NN goes down and you want the DNs > to reconnect to a different host, how do you do that when all data is read > at start time? > > > --0016e65a09286bae0c048ea1bfe8-- From general-return-2038-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 17:01:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78230 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 17:01:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 17:01:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 25549 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25318 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25310 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 17:00:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:00:53 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so592967eyd.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.1.17 with SMTP id 17mr1028629wec.99.1282755628245; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.4.72 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branching and testing strategy for 0.22 From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 Thanks for driving this, Owen. Tom On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to get started testing 0.22. > > I plan to start making mini-branches for QA. These branches will be > snapshots that QA can use for testing with an expected lifetime of two weeks > each. Only bug fixes that are blocking QA will be applied to the > mini-branches and every two weeks, the base of the branch will be moved to > the head of trunk. This will allow QA to test a point in time (possibly with > required bug fixes) with requiring development to continually maintain two > branches. > > To simplify automated builds, I'll call the branch the final name of > "branch-0.22." But it will be rebased every two weeks or so. > > Are there any concerns? > > -- Owen > From general-return-2039-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 17:02:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78666 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 17:02:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 17:02:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27607 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:02:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27452 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27444 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 17:02:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:02:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alex.baranov.v@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:01:59 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so6054184qyk.14 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l3NCWWNdmAkB9E2VEBonEiyV2gIkwwvltWcwfDZiwPw=; b=aeFz1NVztoiqkSK5Cffo//AkwnE6OhUWxq4/A4AyLQLxEjgmZ/vVqwD+s33b7C6q/I Kq9vK/3JWxKMOFoVgMR1naELtp+wJmdYKRm6QPr6dYPOp8d92UOOnTFQ9njq2PWB2wNU I/DBurmMukZLVWKTo0YRZENxzqZnoR+uYEjpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=R/eLA2bggYjr59euVOD0ajvto5WmLm4fEtBHA0cB0Rie5nLdldOrD7MLZd56JLZqaw wms1J4xAiebnA8D2hNL0MprEvF9tWHSJL53Gt81PQoC9JwYfWItrSnLZYBdARU40vK0e FYcjxxoj3kOiaOHbSo0HVBlVRXTL8+ver8TX8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.131.143 with SMTP id x15mr4799861qcs.198.1282755698844; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.51.137 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:01:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Searching Hadoop project(s) content From: Alex Baranau To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175747ecc3641e048ea8d5f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175747ecc3641e048ea8d5f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello guys, Over at http://search-hadoop.com we index Hadoop sub-project's mailing lists, wiki, web site, source code, javadoc, jira... Including general MLs for Hadoop TLP. Would the community be interested in a patch that replaces the Google-powered search with that from search-hadoop.com by default? We look into adding this search service for all Hadoop's sub-projects, so we think it will be good (and consistent) to use this it on Hadoop TLP main page as well. Assuming people are for this, any suggestions for how the search should function by default or any specific instructions for how the search box should be modified would be great! Thank you, Alex Baranau. P.S. HBase community already accepted our proposal (please refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2886) and new version (0.90) will include new search box. Also the patch is available for TIKA (we are in the process of discussing some details now): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-488. Hadoop's site looks much like Avro's for which we also created patch recently ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-626). --0015175747ecc3641e048ea8d5f9-- From general-return-2040-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 17:16:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89401 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 17:16:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 17:16:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 50547 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:16:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50347 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50339 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 17:16:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:16:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:16:37 +0000 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so594047ewy.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:16:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.174.67 with SMTP id w45mr1056844wel.78.1282756576255; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.4.72 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:16:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:16:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Arun, I think it would be good to have a shared 0.20 Apache security branch. Since security isn't in 0.21, and the 0.22 release is a some way off as you mention, this would be useful for folks who want the security features sooner (and want to use an Apache release). Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Even with the work on hadoop-0.22 (trunk) starting in earnest it is fairl= y > obvious, given our past history, that it will take a while for us to get = it > stable and deployable - for e.g. it took us nearly 6 months to deploy > hadoop-0.20. > > In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security release > off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common). This wil= l > ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for over 1= 2 > months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until hadoop-0.22 > which has all of these patches. > > Some salient aspects: > a) Full-fledged security implementation deployed at scale (4000 nodes) in > production. > b) Lots of work on the stabilizing and optimizing the NameNode and > JobTracker for over 12 months. This has been critical in deploying Hadoop= at > scale i.e. clusters of 4000 nodes. For e.g. we have a 50% improvement in = CPU > utilization on the JobTracker vis-a-vis the hadoop-0.20.2 release. > c) Several new features in the scheduler (CapacityScheduler), Map-Reduce > framework, better support for multi-tenancy etc. > d) Several performance and stability improvements to the system e.g. > iterative ls, robustness against rogue clients/jobs/users etc. > > Also, given the huge number of features and enhancements I'd like to prop= ose > we create a new 0.20-security branch and commit the Yahoo patchset there = for > the release. > > This has been proposed earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concern= s > about the effect this would have on development on trunk. However, I > believe, we have a case for demonstrable progress on trunk now, and it wo= uld > be useful to have an interim, fully-tested Apache Hadoop release availabl= e > to the community. > > =A0Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release soon > after. At this point a Hadoop Security release alone would add tremendous > value for the reasons above. Presently we would like to get this release = out > quickly to focus the majority of our efforts on trunk. > > Thoughts? > > Arun > > From general-return-2041-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 17:42:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96417 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 17:42:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 17:42:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 78415 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:42:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78244 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78236 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 17:42:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:42:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:42:01 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so1030312vws.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ScleatGM4wL6/gcazgCW04SZYvT2HgBnmLcJU0+nbQg=; b=xkpmziIEQZ+JIwnbuYQz0oQSsjamS/opWoUa6yY6pDSnxqJXqm1gAIUpQsw4RE8oYO OnFiBpO9ShzY26z+DXr6vbCj1SzbXFW+Vp0uAUvmyzNLWEnCM5siXhUFWH07D1vXahUx JEN4EiJOH/6onskHBFH3aSTFlPmDhIwnDq6po= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KeDcPILORqfguS6VWZH/Imf8Tr+GtrnOm5sQt5cD/lxRVJstNHfd861oulSFvY53dE iDnf9W5FdAUKAsdhuMehzyihv178oscxmbEUdaPRYmRbZ4k0i6d/ONUN/VMuRfT6KLg0 W5/wek1DEoqLuK1WLWISNhTYG2XBpCCCrv2fY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.62.72 with SMTP id w8mr5539477vch.60.1282758034918; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.135 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:10:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. =A0In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as of > August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich should = be > the PMC chair. =A0They also agreed that adopting bylaws should be among t= he > first tasks of the new PMC. =A0Full details of the vote can be seen at > http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" = be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the ch= air > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibil= ity > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it furthe= r > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Daniel Dai =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Alan Gates =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Giridharen Kesavan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Olga Natkovich =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Pradeep Kamath =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Santhosh Srinivasan =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Yan Zhou =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Jeff Zhang =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Ashutosh Chauhan =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Richard Ding =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Dmitriy Ryaboy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Thejas Nair =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovic= h > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificatio= n, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0encourage open development and increased participation in = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Ap= ache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apac= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > From general-return-2042-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 17:47:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97545 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 17:47:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 17:47:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 83379 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83339 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 17:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83331 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 17:47:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:47:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:47:05 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so1036649vws.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:46:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rER87QH20koP4iEqbdlFwkTuwTDA6ysztv+YcdjQebg=; b=cfZ/txCYu4z9lMf8HkVCrw6PIjFIYMpPZTE0HBNPvPufuokcykrMHZ7VurJCN0y/ag BoO+0+nBJ39d9VKsKSSdjA8EQQ1C7gP5Nol40082F35yhaVkjwhkSzNTjAeDnEdmRUb2 sflTtOgOYRGPKgI9QjogMQIQxqn0SgPdiHIqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cY4mhZavq16gGJrr+wpEglN5UCnf/qBZ9fY9ribD7DiGk8LjZMlxdliJpIWtRziPF/ YgMCJXryLyi4FENRA1byaAd6bJCevv5EcJgegJtnnutrbI2pCTtrxwJKXRZoRJ6RYZFM T1lDoMSQE+32h+A7P3vUY6RlRs3uuXHD4ioI8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.71.136 with SMTP id h8mr5506255vcj.135.1282758404318; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.178.135 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:46:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:16:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Arun, How much time do you think it would take to have a version of 0.20 with the security features in it ready ? In a different thread, Owen has started discussing plans around 0.22. Do you think this effort would affect 0.22 release ? I do agree that this would be very useful for folks who want security sooner. And the fact that Yahoo! have been running it at scale for a good while now is also assuring. Thanks hemanth On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Even with the work on hadoop-0.22 (trunk) starting in earnest it is fairl= y > obvious, given our past history, that it will take a while for us to get = it > stable and deployable - for e.g. it took us nearly 6 months to deploy > hadoop-0.20. > > In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security release > off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common). This wil= l > ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for over 1= 2 > months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until hadoop-0.22 > which has all of these patches. > > Some salient aspects: > a) Full-fledged security implementation deployed at scale (4000 nodes) in > production. > b) Lots of work on the stabilizing and optimizing the NameNode and > JobTracker for over 12 months. This has been critical in deploying Hadoop= at > scale i.e. clusters of 4000 nodes. For e.g. we have a 50% improvement in = CPU > utilization on the JobTracker vis-a-vis the hadoop-0.20.2 release. > c) Several new features in the scheduler (CapacityScheduler), Map-Reduce > framework, better support for multi-tenancy etc. > d) Several performance and stability improvements to the system e.g. > iterative ls, robustness against rogue clients/jobs/users etc. > > Also, given the huge number of features and enhancements I'd like to prop= ose > we create a new 0.20-security branch and commit the Yahoo patchset there = for > the release. > > This has been proposed earlier by Doug and did not get far due to concern= s > about the effect this would have on development on trunk. However, I > believe, we have a case for demonstrable progress on trunk now, and it wo= uld > be useful to have an interim, fully-tested Apache Hadoop release availabl= e > to the community. > > =A0Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release soon > after. At this point a Hadoop Security release alone would add tremendous > value for the reasons above. Presently we would like to get this release = out > quickly to focus the majority of our efforts on trunk. > > Thoughts? > > Arun > > From general-return-2043-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 18:00:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2004 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 18:00:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 18:00:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 98449 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 18:00:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98216 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 18:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98207 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 18:00:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:00:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:59:52 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-178.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-snve-246-178.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.178]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7PHxBAY007464 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=ZMSGqxMjgizsZThKUMeixo4ELIio3/WSMM+KX6prs3RASDh8K0D8AT5i2tF/uPKY Message-Id: <809E9407-FBA7-4414-90ED-D3AA166CE1D0@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:59:10 -0700 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Arun, > > How much time do you think it would take to have a version of 0.20 > with the security features in it ready ? In a different thread, Owen > has started discussing plans around 0.22. Do you think this effort > would affect 0.22 release ? > I think it should be fairly trivial to get this release out - most of the effort is just the mechanics of committing the patches to an Apache branch from the yahoo git repository, creating a release candidate and calling it a success! *smile* I think doing this quickly is critical in ensuring that we do not lose focus on 0.22, but I believe this will definitely help the community. > I do agree that this would be very useful for folks who want security > sooner. And the fact that Yahoo! have been running it at scale for a > good while now is also assuring. Just to clarify - this has security and a bunch of other enhancements (which are either in 0.21 or 0.22 or both). Arun From general-return-2044-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 18:24:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23371 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 18:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 18:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 48468 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 18:24:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48370 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 18:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48362 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 18:24:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:24:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:24:47 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.93.246.90] (166-205-136-044.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.136.44]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7Q002720GA0T60@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008250135 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-25_09:2010-08-25,2010-08-25,1970-01-01 signatures=0 References: In-reply-to: Message-id: <09945313-C4F5-49D4-9CB2-72E12F8D78A9@mac.com> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8A400) From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Searching Hadoop project(s) content Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:23:45 -0700 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Big +1. This is cool and gr8 that it uses Solr. Cheers, Nige On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Alex Baranau wrote: > Hello guys, > > Over at http://search-hadoop.com we index Hadoop sub-project's mailing > lists, wiki, web site, > source code, javadoc, jira... Including general MLs for Hadoop TLP. > > Would the community be interested in a patch that replaces the > Google-powered > search with that from search-hadoop.com by default? > > We look into adding this search service for all Hadoop's sub-projects, so we > think it will be good (and consistent) to use this it on Hadoop TLP main > page as well. > > Assuming people are for this, any suggestions for how the search should > function by default or any specific instructions for how the search box > should > be modified would be great! > > Thank you, > Alex Baranau. > > P.S. HBase community already accepted our proposal (please refer to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2886) and new version (0.90) > will include new search box. Also the patch is available for TIKA (we are in > the process of discussing some details now): > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-488. Hadoop's site looks much > like Avro's for which we also created patch recently ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-626). From general-return-2045-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 19:21:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49164 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 19:21:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 19:21:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 43606 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 19:21:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43427 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 19:21:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43419 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 19:21:19 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:21:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.9.86] (HELO n4-vm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.9.86) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:20:53 +0000 Received: from [67.195.9.81] by n4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 19:20:31 -0000 Received: from [98.137.27.209] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 19:20:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp119.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Aug 2010 19:20:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 929781.65458.bm@omp119.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78875 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Aug 2010 19:20:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282764030; bh=OxeF0tXhbKQAvXtqHRkjaXiczq+ov9kz+7CWOqIvKjc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SXopJGWpNXtC2g+JetFu9WQDXUmp9ugU2nnIhBnVhgYTHs4fEjz65izi/FvTUE/tIUzzhoc2yQx+TjNj8slnThuXQ/IC6G+2ye/AcB/MDdV4hAosByQOUS2Q3PvsMy4mO3K3LkVvGBR0KSzz5htoQCFViDO8c1P0aj4oDE/rztY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XMFWl05LGxWL1WnNoaAap3OKtYbRh7R+PIqDgbKBZ9hKCgyis/tIAcRfvvgiqXEAXhIS8RtrsnD5EaMQ2hsnd/0ZO8kyyPsqQUYItL/so5kzEqBeHU7f/qf9IRbvOuF2MzrMxMCa/rErkhXo+JrJtU4Y7FvEpNOmi0UWCPCbOTY=; Message-ID: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: QfsyK78VM1l5sc2rgCvIkgn6Y83rUTWCy_0VG4D5F55L00k w88n.PQt7M1n8XmHNERAhIcixVI3zNo4qMvAJqN3eKuvl5vz5ZsVdzY8Q2Rd 7I2QGdSKShy0FKEkh4boyvDsDSHSV5Qx058.g7IVraRVO0RJp5d6Ro0FlSTH uBshXYWDRfh7pdkrJ7tj1EYikOp48rNpDOvHoud44AyH0Ag_Ea498FB2TG.f eTHIGskZ4d_zoInoVvs.ninv.mDftcy8- Received: from [67.180.86.237] by web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:20:30 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:20:30 -0700 (PDT) From: C J Subject: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1998256419-1282764030=:78832" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1998256419-1282764030=:78832 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even though there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed attempts? Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? Thanks, Deepika --0-1998256419-1282764030=:78832-- From general-return-2046-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 20:25:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78683 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 20:25:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 20:25:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 33684 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 20:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33577 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 20:25:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33569 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 20:25:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:25:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:25:48 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=n/HLAkFTbvwdHaYWcARurcvXOMCCY8TTGwYu/i/WG+g11O7m3+y0b+IM dExR26DQlhsUm+1iZ4gHMchMn0NjS01siisnHA7uxP+CqS/kCy9k/D89J fddmaAoFx4GU0ZZ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1282767948; x=1314303948; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20Hadoop=20Security=20Release =20off=20Yahoo!=20patchset|Date:=20Wed,=2025=20Aug=202010 =2020:25:27=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<8750b3fa-93ee-4f42-a482-2ffcd83af88b> |In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20<516684F5-0052-4381 -805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=W7lXWo8hmOsN25N5+k6LftaRoIfZyClxTxFXCXRBiYE=; b=xnJyZ2voKHSWvtQs+aTIl4cd5m9eV+yFzEkpivJkqBg5+p8ARBG7bj10 yDHnHsCiyGu/cl5u0XyoItsc0Y5cxYpcIW9riC9KifWEjwnVE3u/YCKTZ VDLbvp7e+V9SLlF; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,270,1280732400"; d="scan'208";a="14472161" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:25:27 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AQHLQyNHDr2kMsQuFU+y4yuN2iEG2pLy6geAgAAsWoA= Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:25:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8750b3fa-93ee-4f42-a482-2ffcd83af88b> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > I do agree that this would be very useful for folks who want security > sooner. And the fact that Yahoo! have been running it at scale for a > good while now is also assuring. As has been mentioned a few times, part of the security features are depend= ent upon Yahoo!-type operations. Those would need to get replaced or a dec= ision would need to be made that we are removing/regressing certain feature= s (the cluster-wide start scripts).= From general-return-2047-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 21:14:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98562 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 21:14:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 21:14:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 99040 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 21:14:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98928 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 21:14:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98920 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 21:14:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:14:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:13:48 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7PLC0DZ013664 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:12:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=o9OHf6bPKMev3fNz2p4qN0tgqb0IaUcGtVbqkytibwy5yq1P4E20NBYchwb1aN9U Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:12:00 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:11:58 -0700 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AQHLQyNHDr2kMsQuFU+y4yuN2iEG2pLy6geAgAAsWoD//5emyw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C89AD52E24E2Cddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C89AD52E24E2Cddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >As has been mentioned a few times, part of the security features are depen= dent upon Yahoo!-type operations. Allen, could you please enlist them here again (for the benefit of the comm= unity)? Or, are you referring to only the cluster-wide start scripts? On 8/25/10 1:25 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > I do agree that this would be very useful for folks who want security > sooner. And the fact that Yahoo! have been running it at scale for a > good while now is also assuring. As has been mentioned a few times, part of the security features are depend= ent upon Yahoo!-type operations. Those would need to get replaced or a dec= ision would need to be made that we are removing/regressing certain feature= s (the cluster-wide start scripts). --_000_C89AD52E24E2Cddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2048-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Aug 25 23:18:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50129 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2010 23:18:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2010 23:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 33711 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 23:18:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33608 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2010 23:18:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33600 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 23:18:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:18:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:17:59 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1344880qyk.14 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:17:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=py7u67JSDPHIq750riOiV9y7FYKzRqjJ64hDP4rz5IY=; b=Jpe1ml32KmUHEt9Bl21IgckcQ7YjgTXpdn9Uy2gcAwGFfsWNE5FmGxEthzVKxWznbE ZDrmfufFV2H7RFkgEM17LlWSYEurZrrSKRGT0iySxCtWIrOBO0C6mHORAOhem3e2xCh+ Rb/0db1oDhUDh6mLrh6RdoBTWGhQl+nQdpw6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aIT1QTyfLqwpEVSpeqi6RVXs1EMWNs6Y76jWWRLPuQAAFPnl5ueorejU++WiRTyYdX SjnKObrRXOsjyjoG1TScaLTNX28ITJ+vmKTkWtXC0qcjr+MoUZ2hcr1AmUj2dicZo3AO 25P09OFr9ATinlhR0TImc0oBzLJKh6qOF8+8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.43.197 with SMTP id x5mr6070988qae.153.1282778258722; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:17:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:17:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88d3c26fcfa6048eae1655 --00c09f88d3c26fcfa6048eae1655 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Use jps to find out pid of the Child. Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: ps aux | grep On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > though > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > attempts? > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > --00c09f88d3c26fcfa6048eae1655-- From general-return-2049-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 02:29:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16898 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 02:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 02:29:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 34589 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34467 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34458 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:29:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.9.7] (HELO n4-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.9.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:28:48 +0000 Received: from [67.195.9.83] by n4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:28:26 -0000 Received: from [98.137.27.216] by t3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:28:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp126.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:28:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 301341.60641.bm@omp126.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 51981 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Aug 2010 02:28:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282789706; bh=leWTUQEOesPhm6BCfz1Tg54qvWqyFIgWTwqjBXtSMy8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OcVQUmiN+nv27QadlK/9p7hvLWQKRMtT5niOPsZp3ltykhwiTMOElFVSsoXChhbxsGZ3YchcslpHVE4j6TL1WSmuK369Wdc3JmZaDQpFPAjl3FJ1PkT7nDwOMz62JABqW3Nj/pTyMifKozs5iNvGNfGQc9o4SvxukO4vM5f0IAk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=spbhlwmfsDDz2iMeX+bh1K0ika+PPBi/bCgmgyX8XnOLrFm+WZTT+ZSB0HK0BYj+9WvumMfF8v4eIeL2Cu/cBjbtC/fKbKKfi5pBLBMQbz2IQVahhTNnl1FrJO4SLWHxd4viDR55Zpb39spvz5PP9OFFn+Xc/+AR1E/b7Vb0iIM=; Message-ID: <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: fqvKj6kVM1mQrdgvI1kXhdwO_f2N3krtPLnfzDXCgfKjvjp 9zeV9kDHUjc.x89eE7XxGKtwu5T9zd6aeGWQ77yVFYoLrK.tgJMkD6cjG0NA SIFow_Z6Pm.zLIRLyl0of5wG2kZaCmemuHtFRkY7lHrwQVVWD7rRt2Ahe8k4 3Dx_sm12aZvzmTqxGBmfy_jJcWa_jarPAt1BMZjWicLJjHTV5PaB869Bmk9B JIipliewNbYr7fCAMM5M3t8qUZIlUP8H0nr0bYwgfe7dT8tdPKVsYj0gDyt3 CCcE01kA9vYr1QYj4GAGy..sMDPbZ Received: from [67.180.86.237] by web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:28:26 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:28:26 -0700 (PDT) From: C J Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1202581762-1282789706=:50990" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1202581762-1282789706=:50990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks for your reply. Some of these child tasks belong to successful jobs. I am wondering why they are still hanging there for long finished jobs. ________________________________ From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 4:17:38 PM Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers Use jps to find out pid of the Child. Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: ps aux | grep On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > though > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > attempts? > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > --0-1202581762-1282789706=:50990-- From general-return-2050-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 02:35:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17906 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 02:35:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 02:35:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 42517 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 02:35:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42357 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 02:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42349 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 02:35:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:35:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:34:56 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1457440qwk.35 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1V3JZF+LRjRsF7V7SW7cpz1UElikjdheQvoeL/FmtXs=; b=Oe35mSjzjL4gigXBIrWHNkHePJRur9kIKepjSfAl33sMa0x/YCcwz8QdwZrx/aA7lj OaPz/Didd7BBmGSZQhjBPGai6Nt0ZireX6P2qdIPnhJAIvZ+5BDoqKvdTqsxS5gLskO8 013Uc3/9Pwq71lu7FH3OpMTdGv/Y0eKFkw2DQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qICnXR0QXwfdRoEX1Znj0v4TXbGDKpxxAJ0ZdRzlgZKfKbW+q+YXrnMlKFaC2kBLU1 IvTTurZ3FXXEq71yIg7QjSJRxkvK4tvHs57InhUQSSF+QgkjQXPXJAFFEshKo2FRC35K nGq2pvlJvL/ql0wIhMjxQfHlSOZXWVT9e2Dxg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.60.200 with SMTP id q8mr5380839qch.209.1282790075193; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:34:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:34:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517576cb6c0da8e048eb0d6d4 --001517576cb6c0da8e048eb0d6d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 After you obtain pid, you can use jstack to see what the Child process was doing. What hadoop version are you using ? On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:28 PM, C J wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Some of these child tasks belong to successful jobs. I am wondering why > they are > still hanging there for long finished jobs. > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 4:17:38 PM > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > Use jps to find out pid of the Child. > Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: > ps aux | grep > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > > though > > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > > attempts? > > > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > > > Thanks, > > Deepika > > > > > > > > > > > --001517576cb6c0da8e048eb0d6d4-- From general-return-2051-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 03:00:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25047 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 03:00:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 03:00:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 81998 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 03:00:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81626 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 03:00:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81618 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 03:00:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:00:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.37] (HELO n61.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:59:55 +0000 Received: from [216.252.122.216] by n61.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:59:35 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.83] by t1.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:59:35 -0000 Received: from [98.137.27.128] by t3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:59:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2010 02:59:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 918454.70232.bm@omp202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 46932 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Aug 2010 02:59:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282791574; bh=9gr90DBHrdb4z8wKC5dpYR576MeWk3aUHOdXOnKWl/g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LVUnd12kuAY5B0hj0lRzW9oFpbMVeC1QPPnbvSY5aQH1c8VRwAWKoMLGvBM+VOMSsRAqiGI8mvdksUclypvaDrEULmCdWhhv5WTrr2WT5WucyCN3rqU+jRTclnQEp7UIT+LOEm8SpcBfPux/yO+ftAP0AvYsQYd0lNebKiwRl5s= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=l37DNp0x7bnsABD+PWkPzOB7TqMMCK27srZdIm8yu0QJDKZHGOTROmr27H0mryQ9qj/3bpYDDbveSg2HoHM52CnkFCuMD+85mDqXKC/nM5nDZMTZfWRGyVk1QL+RogdpW/cChOoxAXKRgvE0M93vnf37yiJU7foif1flGJZQ/m8=; Message-ID: <698249.46749.qm@web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 43iyqEsVM1kRrmUktws.cMt68Shi9M87nNTBtR.IZ8PFMLC xsY1dBxrm8fTsNXB65T9wj7AJjve19dANalcU18NHWadzoSOgpDwROWIfgS7 OZA86gozLQEwdH5YKDq8bk6BNodTAOBvejPOwzeLPSP.P7nwN9uj3rCEM0fU dsx.Dn7u5aVmaaL20AEf9fXxitEz7h1Q7HJmLSeNT1oWCyO1a45BoEyf0Qf. tGf8Xh0ot0pZN3N.GfUWosnQBi14RRbKLtUPE.U2GAb_s4VuSmACqWkYV.W4 Ed8wo8D1RlIZ0ODFdsx1O6NqS4ETaF6oMtbyZLN26pzZ43iyG1bI2tJKz.yn TryAt0w-- Received: from [67.180.86.237] by web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:59:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:59:34 -0700 (PDT) From: C J Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-793388696-1282791574=:46749" --0-793388696-1282791574=:46749 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Ted! I did a jstack and it seems there is an issue with ehcache that I am using in the mapper task. "net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager@57ac3379" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0000000059180800 nid=0x379e in Object.wait() [0x0000000041506000] java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:509) - locked <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None . . . The hadoop version I am using is 0.20.2. Thanks. ________________________________ From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 7:34:35 PM Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers After you obtain pid, you can use jstack to see what the Child process was doing. What hadoop version are you using ? On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:28 PM, C J wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Some of these child tasks belong to successful jobs. I am wondering why > they are > still hanging there for long finished jobs. > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 4:17:38 PM > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > Use jps to find out pid of the Child. > Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: > ps aux | grep > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > > though > > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > > attempts? > > > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > > > Thanks, > > Deepika > > > > > > > > > > > --0-793388696-1282791574=:46749-- From general-return-2052-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 03:39:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39506 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 03:39:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 03:39:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 99047 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 03:39:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98740 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 03:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98732 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 03:39:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:39:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:39:22 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1545792qyk.14 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:39:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=whTTiuXx2recTIlCMLDII4FNHLMrvwk96blUQulimo4=; b=Xx8NiMh42df0AJERBgE2OyPt44QIkVsHSAcZ2zo1r/9Xw+AOB0cQC3R7JRv8D+V7xb pIgSoRT34ofqlf2i/CWrxZWepM83h7zWkHGT58lUWAPXtzx6Vp1tqhd0zwNJ0yJfZQLa PmIT81eYW7I5Rw4/X7tLJKXKVWjsEhaN19ZQI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=I0yntf+LRCDnsRD9eWGdUNImHyJ/5r43EGTioyjJwWTfUaNFqbvyRh8Lb2R7MGZ1sz jpK8xk2Ys0Otv+5mDZOei18TUo3jR11xOEgaqD10nbqg+pwmjFHtvgOfJpTFLdXs45mE +du5D3gdYAIIynih3xIOT1/VLet2B9u6KJpQA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.71.69 with SMTP id g5mr5536014qcj.176.1282793941909; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:39:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <698249.46749.qm@web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <698249.46749.qm@web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:39:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64bb8043a4317048eb1bd39 --0016e64bb8043a4317048eb1bd39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't use ehcache. Did you forget to close CacheManager at the end of your job by any chance ? On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:59 PM, C J wrote: > Thanks Ted! > > I did a jstack and it seems there is an issue with ehcache that I am using > in > the mapper task. > > > "net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager@57ac3379" daemon prio=10 > tid=0x0000000059180800 > nid=0x379e in Object.wait() [0x0000000041506000] > java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) > at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:509) > - locked <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) > at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462) > > Locked ownable synchronizers: > - None > . > . > . > > > The hadoop version I am using is 0.20.2. > > Thanks. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 7:34:35 PM > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > After you obtain pid, you can use jstack to see what the Child process was > doing. > > What hadoop version are you using ? > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:28 PM, C J wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > Some of these child tasks belong to successful jobs. I am wondering why > > they are > > still hanging there for long finished jobs. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ted Yu > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 4:17:38 PM > > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > > > Use jps to find out pid of the Child. > > Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: > > ps aux | grep > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > > > though > > > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > > > attempts? > > > > > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Deepika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e64bb8043a4317048eb1bd39-- From general-return-2053-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 09:41:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44990 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 09:41:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 09:41:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 67203 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 09:41:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66716 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 09:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66703 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 09:41:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616081BA524 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:41:00 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 98LMn3+kaKgl for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:41:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2EDB1BA4BC for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:40:59 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1283420447.3031@YJXMMmOsUySvf7rml80hxQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7Q9ekbC013022 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:40:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C76369E.5030702@apache.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:40:46 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7Q9ekbC013022 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 25/08/10 20:20, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even though > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed attempts? > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > could be a bug somewhere in Hadoop or your code. 1. jps -v gives you the process ids, 2. jstack -l gives you the stack dumps and locks for the given process, so you can see where the threads are -this will help you track down the problem 3. It is, sadly, going to be you who gets to track down the problem. But if you conclude that it is hadoop and not your code at fault, those stack traces should be attached to the JIRA issue you can create From general-return-2054-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 12:57:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7493 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 12:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 12:57:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 98603 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 12:57:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98180 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 12:57:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98172 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 12:57:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:57:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:56:58 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so1571008eyd.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:56:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jNxXetL+JBF06/zS72KD59S1SuqArtNOozNkZ01SFcA=; b=UONfuGbzbCCDfjyaCyA3GbZkfWSF5FvgAIViGMnFBpc1CRcXtTBV2L2Sx/vYUznGU0 kf0AyjVdtmsf3bF3bNy9BgArAnOA98aob0gCCw8JX/HfwueqoUSOpqsZMwyvexR9jJE1 +MSG5UANcC9Yl/egoR9je7ice8zq0/US/P4nI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=afNM/s8K9xxo4tDjyY1KE+aEDv3M4fvCMBaSmrb5gaSPGGxl6NDp9jenVMuZC/IDlC 4u5OtUapRO/v01/2gt8uTc5QsV7y0Y3ZlxvyYqDuKmXPoTzAnZuuw9Dd/ngTVoeOTweK Lfs6Vvk0z3ir4M6etBucH9qKHlBqfLclyZEDo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.54.202 with SMTP id i52mr8909179wec.40.1282827396940; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.132 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:26:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04c44d8472048eb987a9 --0016e6de04c44d8472048eb987a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi , I am using hadoop version : 0.20.2 . I am getting this error message. WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. What to do? Is there any problem in the cluster Thanks and Best Regards Vaibhav Negi --0016e6de04c44d8472048eb987a9-- From general-return-2055-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 14:12:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33292 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 14:12:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 14:12:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 89446 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 14:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89044 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 14:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89035 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 14:12:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:12:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:12:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307421BA4BC for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:12:06 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id id0SxtFBOGlb for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:12:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7E8A1BA4A7 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:12:05 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1283436713.07572@4JPVfvEwdszzcCQNQiPjwQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7QEBqjX020302 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:11:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C767628.7030803@apache.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:11:52 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <809E9407-FBA7-4414-90ED-D3AA166CE1D0@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <809E9407-FBA7-4414-90ED-D3AA166CE1D0@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7QEBqjX020302 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 25/08/10 18:59, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > >> Arun, >> >> How much time do you think it would take to have a version of 0.20 >> with the security features in it ready ? In a different thread, Owen >> has started discussing plans around 0.22. Do you think this effort >> would affect 0.22 release ? >> > > I think it should be fairly trivial to get this release out - most of > the effort is just the mechanics of committing the patches to an Apache > branch from the yahoo git repository, creating a release candidate and > calling it a success! *smile* oh, and testing it.. what scalability patches like HDFS-599 are in? From general-return-2056-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 16:10:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74811 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 16:10:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 16:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4455 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:10:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4290 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4282 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 16:10:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:10:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:10:44 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c206.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.206]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QG9biQ070318 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:09:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Kev8c3yDqqcd6oB6RCHfvFgFozfzqX4lXwsX9AO8QG+pPHdNdfXhrog6IjsYyJn/ Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4C767628.7030803@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:09:38 -0700 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <809E9407-FBA7-4414-90ED-D3AA166CE1D0@yahoo-inc.com> <4C767628.7030803@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 26, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 25/08/10 18:59, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >> >>> Arun, >>> >>> How much time do you think it would take to have a version of 0.20 >>> with the security features in it ready ? In a different thread, Owen >>> has started discussing plans around 0.22. Do you think this effort >>> would affect 0.22 release ? >>> >> >> I think it should be fairly trivial to get this release out - most of >> the effort is just the mechanics of committing the patches to an >> Apache >> branch from the yahoo git repository, creating a release candidate >> and >> calling it a success! *smile* > > oh, and testing it.. > Already is! *smile* It's running on 4k clusters in production at this point... From general-return-2057-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 16:41:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85947 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 16:41:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 16:41:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 49502 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:41:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49441 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49433 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 16:41:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:41:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:41:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518E1B7D73 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:41:05 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vkXuVUgRsRxk for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:41:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1D9B7D65 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:41:03 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1283445651.2027@sDp4v9RMaYVLsIFuYYPlEQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7QGenKV023687 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:40:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C769911.4050604@apache.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:40:49 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <809E9407-FBA7-4414-90ED-D3AA166CE1D0@yahoo-inc.com> <4C767628.7030803@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o7QGenKV023687 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 26/08/10 17:09, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> On 25/08/10 18:59, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: >>> >>>> Arun, >>>> >>>> How much time do you think it would take to have a version of 0.20 >>>> with the security features in it ready ? In a different thread, Owen >>>> has started discussing plans around 0.22. Do you think this effort >>>> would affect 0.22 release ? >>>> >>> >>> I think it should be fairly trivial to get this release out - most of >>> the effort is just the mechanics of committing the patches to an Apache >>> branch from the yahoo git repository, creating a release candidate and >>> calling it a success! *smile* >> >> oh, and testing it.. >> > > Already is! *smile* > It's running on 4k clusters in production at this point... > +1 then, ship it. From general-return-2058-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 16:42:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86530 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 16:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 16:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 51108 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:42:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51029 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 16:42:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51021 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 16:42:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:42:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:42:09 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so7438809qyk.14 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EHeoJNRe59gS9qxKoFXMjRXNX81fAtCgEXm1LfGr14Y=; b=HuwlJLFtxjlaRPXwb4VXcJGqaoEYVFbsR2JnQMTuoYZiicSedGZXY6m1lmDMbzC7yQ yU3nKtkfdoFxqOpgSAy3pfBOcWjnIjpQTZYL+t1w0UTJTCiJsnV32l+Vlk0wEpQd6hqV aCnb7ukNphWC2uD2XfEFde8t7GjjuPjZEpIck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wsATTI1DNFKnDN5p4Qzh2bbpR0WBXzHcUabw5NX9G/6A2lJoboKc0/A+4A6/59izOP B6pgTYGfKUbGUZLF+NZdbiB3io+e4rCp6whqhQjWGM/vpSGCtkcEauwXDnPwiQXb4p8T mwlZEhTCCDmR13Gnv7/Z6u5VCKGoxI0wELnBo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.119.18 with SMTP id x18mr6788833qaq.302.1282840908695; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.129 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:41:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000feae9a993aa89f6048ebcacc9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000feae9a993aa89f6048ebcacc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Run fsck. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:56 AM, vaibhav negi wrote: > Hi , > > I am using hadoop version : 0.20.2 . I am getting this error message. > > WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run > fsck. > > What to do? Is there any problem in the cluster > > Thanks and Best Regards > > Vaibhav Negi > --000feae9a993aa89f6048ebcacc9-- From general-return-2059-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 17:04:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93122 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 17:04:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 17:04:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 91584 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 17:04:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91527 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 17:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91516 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 17:04:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:04:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.24] (HELO qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:03:54 +0000 Received: from omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z51v1e0051afHeLA253aXX; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:03:34 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z53R1e00B2SbwD58d53Tcb; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:03:31 +0000 Message-Id: <232F87F7-2B71-43F3-8B6A-BBCC00106B0B@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:03:25 -0700 References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. +1 From general-return-2060-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 17:18:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1695 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 17:18:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 17:18:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 8157 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 17:18:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8069 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 17:18:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8058 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 17:18:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:18:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:18:11 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QHHbsL081750; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Zrxj419QDu383L/c2vFEJn1R/HytwsLsMiQsFvh4DgjVeauO3/cwVgYGWGUZGnIV Cc: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: From: Alan Gates To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:17:37 -0700 References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) With 15 +1 votes (14 from PMC members) the proposal passes. Thanks for voting. Owen, please push this to the Apache board for their consideration. Alan. On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > Foundation; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > it further > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Pig Project: > > * Benjamin Reed > * Daniel Dai > * Alan Gates > * Giridharen Kesavan > * Olga Natkovich > * Pradeep Kamath > * Santhosh Srinivasan > * Yan Zhou > * Jeff Zhang > * Ashutosh Chauhan > * Richard Ding > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > * Thejas Nair > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development and increased participation in the > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > From general-return-2061-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 18:32:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31439 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 18:32:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19152 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18931 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 257 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2010 04:46:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anant.bw@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VTIeQ1uMgj6xzSJ3h7QYZyDFgu7zq20NtfArjLAsOZI=; b=knuWVGZ9UzQ+NLRPRi+q6hhk0yHgmjVe7t7TZ+yx7ZbftjTLLWoEI2HK6fTYmrFJPe 6uJ23IwcBf+DBgjo+wMSXsaPXCj1fAYfVbYPLKBu7f/ietmqVNbtqHVf53sMH05fJviF 9OXtzpClmKMokxAKDxEMCvqgj0ZFC6g4KkEU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nvC9zxshnAAPFlYFsy0J6UERNYknNK7E2mOrpkQ4bSp+nxj19Zwz8rveAT/EstNQ4W n6y1s208qpK+1So6gYcOEvJPJ2gwjLN1r01oWdLqDivpWs8hwGJwfRSwlBkM4wD2wRje pZ84K4TEfIaqALmYDM5su/M8sCX55f28oJ8po= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:16:25 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: Anant Wadhokar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a6376b2383048e9e902e --001636c5a6376b2383048e9e902e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > +1 > > > From: Alan Gates > > Date: August 23, 2010 10:38:12 AM PDT > > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > Subject: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP > > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > > > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > Foundation; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > > it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Pig Project: > > > > * Benjamin Reed > > * Daniel Dai > > * Alan Gates > > * Giridharen Kesavan > > * Olga Natkovich > > * Pradeep Kamath > > * Santhosh Srinivasan > > * Yan Zhou > > * Jeff Zhang > > * Ashutosh Chauhan > > * Richard Ding > > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > > * Thejas Nair > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > > encourage open development and increased participation in the > > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > --001636c5a6376b2383048e9e902e-- From general-return-2062-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 18:32:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31832 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 18:32:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 20670 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20584 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58803 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 11:23:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vaibhav.negi@one97.net designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [125.63.68.99] Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:52:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. From: Vaibhav Negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215048fb75a8e9b048eb838af --002215048fb75a8e9b048eb838af Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , I am using hadoop version : 0.20.2 . I am getting this error message. WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. What to do? Is there any problem in the cluster Regards Vaibhav Negi Software Engineer=96 Engineering. One97 Communications Ltd P: +91 11 46500197 Extn:461 M: + 91 9582259332 Let=92s Get Talking! --002215048fb75a8e9b048eb838af-- From general-return-2063-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 18:56:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36614 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 18:56:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 18:56:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 60510 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:56:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60447 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 18:56:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60439 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 18:56:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:56:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gallowaymd@ornl.gov designates 160.91.4.119 as permitted sender) Received: from [160.91.4.119] (HELO emroute1.ornl.gov) (160.91.4.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:56:20 +0000 Received: from emroute1.ornl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by emroute1.ornl.gov (PMDF V6.5-x1 #31823) with ESMTP id <0L7R00G88WLBIE@emroute1.ornl.gov> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:55:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.emroute1.ornl.gov by emroute1.ornl.gov (PMDF V6.5-x1 #31823) id <0L7R00I01WLBCC@emroute1.ornl.gov> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:55:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from exchhub2.ornl.gov (exchhub2.ornl.gov [160.91.2.112]) by emroute1.ornl.gov (PMDF V6.5-x1 #31823) with ESMTPS id <0L7R00E3AWLBLR@emroute1.ornl.gov> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:55:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EXCHMB.ornl.gov ([160.91.2.201]) by exchhub2.ornl.gov ([160.91.2.112]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:55:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:55:58 -0400 From: "Galloway, Michael D." Subject: Re: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. In-reply-to: To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-language: en-US Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Thread-Topic: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. Thread-Index: ActFTRoYQvQRA0QuRma771CFEIEhogAAzf2u Accept-Language: en-US acceptlanguage: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org QXMgc2FpZCBlYXJsaWVyIHRyeToNCg0KaGFkb29wIGZzY2sgLw0KDQoNCg0KLS0tLS0gT3JpZ2lu YWwgTWVzc2FnZSAtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogVmFpYmhhdiBOZWdpIFttYWlsdG86dmFpYmhhdi5uZWdp QG9uZTk3Lm5ldF0NClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMjYsIDIwMTAgMDc6MjIgQU0KVG86 IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcgPGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc+DQpT dWJqZWN0OiBXQVJOSU5HIDogVGhlcmUgYXJlIGFib3V0IDEgbWlzc2luZyBibG9ja3MuIFBsZWFz ZSBjaGVjayB0aGUgbG9nIG9yIHJ1biBmc2NrLg0KDQpIaSAsDQoNCkkgYW0gdXNpbmcgaGFkb29w IHZlcnNpb24gOiAwLjIwLjIgLiBJIGFtIGdldHRpbmcgdGhpcyBlcnJvciBtZXNzYWdlLg0KDQpX QVJOSU5HIDogVGhlcmUgYXJlIGFib3V0IDEgbWlzc2luZyBibG9ja3MuIFBsZWFzZSBjaGVjayB0 aGUgbG9nIG9yIHJ1bg0KZnNjay4NCg0KV2hhdCB0byBkbz8gSXMgdGhlcmUgYW55IHByb2JsZW0g aW4gdGhlIGNsdXN0ZXINCg0KDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMNCg0KVmFpYmhhdiBOZWdpDQpTb2Z0d2FyZSBF bmdpbmVlcuKAkyBFbmdpbmVlcmluZy4NCk9uZTk3IENvbW11bmljYXRpb25zIEx0ZA0KUDogKzkx IDExIDQ2NTAwMTk3ICAgICAgRXh0bjo0NjENCk06ICsgOTEgOTU4MjI1OTMzMg0KDQpMZXTigJlz IEdldCBUYWxraW5nIQ0K From general-return-2064-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 19:09:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42837 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 19:09:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 19:09:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 82853 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 19:09:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82749 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 19:09:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82741 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 19:09:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:09:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:09:09 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so2049036eyd.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jUijN+3P0bhoadD+Hxrp8U/wYIgAIIcWu+jKY3pFo6Y=; b=f7rVni5ZNo0K6XNa39anpk3bTOJgljv8/A1q0ZV7fCYottGlfCa9y+TRSgGqIVR+ZI 9CNvwghzDtuAcPOIqOxoqLSZL32nL+FTz3eK0RmzxrNSWIJqajoKSscVLOFgJLY9fU4L N9m+LwZIuKnLVxweZsKKE46Q9xFSsPW6g4dWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=cWpG2uOZcROr6S2/91fovzgBE1rRzdqsa48AuySnkYM4NCePlTO0Vhsfi6ZxNw/o0Y M6TBfy14iNDIXIZAYeg/JBaqapqKtrr4xRwMw+7IaqPT/pImOovwhY3NELWLPFV8O3ak p0fAXoQSAa7yXLHZgUHHGGIeDnV3BOh3+J5MQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.232.90 with SMTP id m68mr9407875weq.10.1282849728056; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.131.24 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:08:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -q0VLy-3uT0GdofsRxE-5WQ9R-Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security release > off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common). This wil= l > ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for over 1= 2 > months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until hadoop-0.22 > which has all of these patches. > Sounds good to me. What will this release be called? hadoop-0.20.3-securi= ty? > =A0Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release soon > after. Well, it'd probably be better if we just did an append release first? A good few of us have been banging on the 0.20-append branch w/ a while now and its for sure doing append better than 0.20 did (smile). St.Ack From general-return-2065-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 20:03:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55932 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 20:03:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 20:03:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 58600 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 20:03:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58505 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 20:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58497 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 20:03:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:03:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of athusoo@facebook.com designates 69.63.178.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.178.170] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.178.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:03:46 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.134] ([10.18.255.134:8416] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta012.snc1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id E7/2B-27680-E88C67C4; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:03:26 -0700 Received: from SC-MBX03.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.2.176]) by sc-hub04.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::8df5:7f90:d4a0:bb9%11]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:01:20 -0700 From: Ashish Thusoo To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Index: ActFWXOffgxgalakRSm+ZBxRJ3CyBg== Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:01:20 +0000 Message-ID: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 The Hive development community voted and passed the following resolution. T= he details of the vote is at http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of 8/24/2010) w= ith Namit Jain being the chair. Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. Thanks, Ashish Draft Resolution to be sent to the Apache Board ----------------------------------------------- Establish the Apache Hive Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to parallel analysis of large data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hive Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hive" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Hive Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Hive Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hive Project: * Namit Jain (namit@apache.org) * John Sichi (jvs@apache.org) * Zheng Shao (zshao@apache.org) * Edward Capriolo (appodictic@apache.org) * Raghotham Murthy (rsm@apache.org) * Ning Zhang (nzhang@apache.org) * Paul Yang (pauly@apache.org) * He Yongqiang (he yongqiang@apache.org) * Prasad Chakka (prasadc@apache.org) * Joydeep Sen Sarma (jsensarma@apache.org) * Ashish Thusoo (athusoo@apache.org) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Namit Jain be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hive, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Hive PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Hive Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop Hive sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hive sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-2066-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 22:57:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13259 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 22:57:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 22:57:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 57673 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 22:57:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57440 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 22:57:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57432 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 22:57:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:57:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.227] (HELO qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:56:55 +0000 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z59E1e0070EZKEL5CAwbmy; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:56:35 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zAwS1e00F2SbwD53MAwVVv; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:56:33 +0000 Message-Id: <6E66BD35-8825-495B-8DA4-575766CADD46@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:56:25 -0700 References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > The Hive development community voted and passed the following > resolution. +1 -- Owen From general-return-2067-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:09:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19641 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:09:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:09:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 68839 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:09:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68720 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68712 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:09:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:09:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:09:04 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-72.corp.yahoo.com ([172.21.148.72]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QN8K5N024353 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5EB1D979-3F2A-41B2-BE2B-F3062B0CE75B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:08:19 -0700 References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > The Hive development community voted and passed the following > resolution. The details of the vote is at > > http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU > > The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of > 8/24/2010) with Namit Jain being the chair. > > Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. +1 Arun From general-return-2068-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20883 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:13:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 76450 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76389 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76376 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:13:37 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:13:15 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QNBht8043958 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:11:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=mO/JvCjE3OHWzCcMOC66cYBmJOTquA/RD5g0d/B2S8iTF0JAH0OW44IJC68ojC+Y Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:11:43 -0500 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:11:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Index: ActFc+FQgok0pATjQM+n8DJQ6VC1NAAACoX6 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5EB1D979-3F2A-41B2-BE2B-F3062B0CE75B@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On 8/26/10 4:08 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >=20 >> The Hive development community voted and passed the following >> resolution. The details of the vote is at >>=20 >> http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU >>=20 >> The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of >> 8/24/2010) with Namit Jain being the chair. >>=20 >> Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. >=20 > +1 >=20 > Arun >=20 From general-return-2069-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:24:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22644 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:24:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:24:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 83796 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83734 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83726 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:24:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:24:10 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-72.corp.yahoo.com ([172.21.148.72]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QNMcfG029851 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:22:38 -0700 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: >> In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security >> release >> off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common). >> This will >> ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for >> over 12 >> months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until >> hadoop-0.22 >> which has all of these patches. >> > > Sounds good to me. What will this release be called? hadoop-0.20.3- > security? hadoop-0.20-security. I want to ensure hadoop-0.20 be a separate line, so as to not confuse people. > >> Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release >> soon >> after. > > Well, it'd probably be better if we just did an append release first? > A good few of us have been banging on the 0.20-append branch w/ a > while now and its for sure doing append better than 0.20 did (smile). I think these are orthogonal and both can run their own course. Arun From general-return-2070-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:29:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24825 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:29:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 91248 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91161 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91153 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:28:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:28:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:28:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 23939 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:28:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:28:16 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so2613593iwn.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:28:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.183.81 with SMTP id cf17mr104856ibb.32.1282865288953; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.145.15 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:28:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:28:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote: > Sounds good to me. =C2=A0What will this release be called? =C2=A0hadoop-0= .20.3-security? It is a new branch, so the question is what is the branch name. I'd propose calling it 0.20-security and the releases would be 0.20-security.0, etc. > Well, it'd probably be better if we just did an append release first? I don't think the ordering maters. 0.20-security is a different branch that isn't comparable to 0.20-append. 0.20 < 0.20-security < 0.22 0.20 < 0.20-append < 0.21 < 0.22 It does make a bit of a mess. -- Owen From general-return-2071-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:30:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25553 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:30:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 95052 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94877 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:30:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94868 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:30:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:30:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:30:44 +0000 Received: by qyk12 with SMTP id 12so45509qyk.14 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:30:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ThlO/ZJqta+uvJMhmJWRIcNACWBTyPrSYsddUq1sT5A=; b=wT4imcuzkhp1IlWTteyI+eQKpubQNzbqfwzzYj9klBmog6WBGMhMKUvVwvzFyKybP+ gZQgnU7YLgMWVKdByWzJiWm24n9/Yw3D2qzI99J/+bRfsibNqUp+Mgge645AxAXb0F6A butpcCsKhkj6i6HhkNLFRm57Lsw47KuYwWnQs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JZAWp2F4l/b4HplB5NIBW+2yTI/vQtZdybjbHCBnV/7Tzo83so9v61oGBZMXpwYeyL /fjHhkkoa34EZW2nToAWT+BdSNr6AnRyfl/CLNs0JA4OjVr5SYe1xKqq77un24ghf8lR NbrY6oFMbLV3FSZFgMW6HopduqqOS38zbASNo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.10.198 with SMTP id q6mr7183882qaq.366.1282865423633; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.48.129 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:30:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:30:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce170dece54048ec261b6 --0015175ce170dece54048ec261b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This would imply hadoop-0.20-security-append or hadoop-0.20-append-security release be created which contains security and append features. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Stack wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security release >>> off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop-common). This >>> will >>> ensure the community benefits from all the work done at Yahoo! for over >>> 12 >>> months *now*, and ensures that we do not have to wait until hadoop-0.22 >>> which has all of these patches. >>> >>> >> Sounds good to me. What will this release be called? >> hadoop-0.20.3-security? >> > > hadoop-0.20-security. I want to ensure hadoop-0.20 be a separate line, so > as to not confuse people. > > > >> Conceivably, one could imagine a Hadoop Security + Append release soon >>> after. >>> >> >> Well, it'd probably be better if we just did an append release first? >> A good few of us have been banging on the 0.20-append branch w/ a >> while now and its for sure doing append better than 0.20 did (smile). >> > > I think these are orthogonal and both can run their own course. > > Arun > --0015175ce170dece54048ec261b6-- From general-return-2072-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:42:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28726 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:42:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:42:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 12296 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12225 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12217 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:42:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:42:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:42:40 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-72.corp.yahoo.com ([172.21.148.72]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7QNfpWr037120 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-465--383767883 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:41:49 -0700 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-465--383767883 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > This would imply hadoop-0.20-security-append or hadoop-0.20-append- > security > release be created which contains security and append features. As I mentioned in my initial proposal - it's conceivable, not imminent. The community might decide that it is a valuable direction and folks may work on integrating the two. At this point, I am signing up to shepherd hadoop-0.20-security. I'd like to do it quickly and move on to working on Hadoop trunk, others are welcome to take this and run further. Arun --Apple-Mail-465--383767883-- From general-return-2073-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Aug 26 23:47:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29690 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 23:47:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 23:47:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 14955 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:47:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14869 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 23:47:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14861 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:47:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 29668 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 23:47:17 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:17 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so2636924iwn.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.157.11 with SMTP id z11mr62647ibw.147.1282866436233; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.144.198 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:47:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 -C On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote= : > The Hive development community voted and passed the following resolution.= The details of the vote is at > > http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU > > The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of 8/24/2010)= with Namit Jain being the chair. > > Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. > > Thanks, > Ashish > > Draft Resolution to be sent to the Apache Board > ----------------------------------------------- > > Establish the Apache Hive Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the bes= t > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to parallel analysis of larg= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hive Project"= , > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hive= " be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the c= hair > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache Hive Project, and to have primary responsib= ility > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache Hive Project; and be it furt= her > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be an= d > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Namit Jain (namit@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * John Sichi (jvs@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Zheng Shao (zshao@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Edward Capriolo (appodictic@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Raghotham Murthy (rsm@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ning Zhang (nzhang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Paul Yang (pauly@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * He Yongqiang (he yongqiang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Prasad Chakka (prasadc@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Joydeep Sen Sarma (jsensarma@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ashish Thusoo (athusoo@apache.org) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Namit Jain > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hive= , to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificati= on, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Hive PMC be and hereby = is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in= the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the A= pache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop Hive sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apa= che > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hive sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2074-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 04:36:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99046 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 04:36:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 04:36:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 91186 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 04:36:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90732 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 04:36:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90721 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 04:36:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:36:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:36:25 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so3867048wyf.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:36:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=yubnqvOxH5wghrCpYkYGbKsY6Wx8HEC3NSs/FNvj738=; b=EB33TQQMJk3OmD8LvVxCcLashTf7H5zW9WTJ1uSxsGVM1X2xzK3j4FLT8y13qVzYT8 iThVljLOiCKF5pN9N5N+tap5qhD8o5CsobIb1Py02dwuDLqriYMcjAA54gc50LlA9KVJ 541ZJLQU2Aa8DnvCZrp7fhDzK17JDEe5eZy6A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=s0kxgdGVKoz/KsR0jnvzQXo/+kby4MpDE7MzcTnGKr4fEFAitN4uUFMlgt736znTif nfwKXCN8W4XIXDqO0rrTWNeKgHsNL4hFo2uEmJzVQe6s9p3N1Ox6Pp/bDNSuq/C9ff1A K0rspA8uflNaeccszPNCW3CYZ4AFl4FPVq8M8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.149 with SMTP id w21mr362510weq.65.1282883763984; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.131.24 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:36:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:36:03 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kMgnyV0mWk1EHF7ITuSXqcASimo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 From general-return-2075-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 04:57:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1860 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 04:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 04:57:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 98348 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 04:57:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98110 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 04:57:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98101 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 04:57:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:57:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.35] (HELO n62.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:57:31 +0000 Received: from [69.147.84.145] by n62.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Aug 2010 04:57:10 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.83] by t8.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Aug 2010 04:57:09 -0000 Received: from [98.137.27.213] by t3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Aug 2010 04:57:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp123.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Aug 2010 04:57:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 775245.97277.bm@omp123.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 4617 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Aug 2010 04:50:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282884628; bh=1yI+hc4XTnhJECggri8ntKXJVf6XIC+ITm0bxdV8epI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CjWv1B7dapG78ir8tLprDeE1XVWXiR3PiXzy96yTd2elA2506BaNkXLiq1MReg0sM3ne9icV2bMfm7lpD72DBN/VM7BOxf/GfRimz5ehE1qS1Q7uHDwFWdeRR1x/ouiRrhICLWZ/oN7aQc4ENnCJiYdQFBBT4NOb1tDtIs264js= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vRuxvJanBq/nfM3ky486G8b0ny8TGKLwegNm3uyElsU7dSc1VkHT991GU4tL4EChNxTHWlUe3K5DKHv7nTMbTqkWpXmHlqn4DBAAqj3O+ZsT5sMiUwC6M9WyFAcqWLgYNMxAEo2FPFkN4fJM9/jcjTJHojshMlVYZKzlyKzJQQs=; Message-ID: <350379.4590.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: btZMeHsVM1nIev0go_f7wKZUb.XBcrjIrPjREguYEbQVxgb G_j6XsWb_ Received: from [67.180.86.237] by web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:50:27 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <715590.78832.qm@web114505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <194169.50990.qm@web114512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <698249.46749.qm@web114510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:50:27 -0700 (PDT) From: C J Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1426679418-1282884627=:4590" --0-1426679418-1282884627=:4590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Ted. Yes, I forgot to shutdown the CacheManager. Appreciate your help. ________________________________ From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 8:39:01 PM Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers I don't use ehcache. Did you forget to close CacheManager at the end of your job by any chance ? On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:59 PM, C J wrote: > Thanks Ted! > > I did a jstack and it seems there is an issue with ehcache that I am using > in > the mapper task. > > > "net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager@57ac3379" daemon prio=10 > tid=0x0000000059180800 > nid=0x379e in Object.wait() [0x0000000041506000] > java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) > at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:509) > - locked <0x00002aaabb0b89a8> (a java.util.TaskQueue) > at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:462) > > Locked ownable synchronizers: > - None > . > . > . > > > The hadoop version I am using is 0.20.2. > > Thanks. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 7:34:35 PM > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > After you obtain pid, you can use jstack to see what the Child process was > doing. > > What hadoop version are you using ? > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:28 PM, C J wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > Some of these child tasks belong to successful jobs. I am wondering why > > they are > > still hanging there for long finished jobs. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ted Yu > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 4:17:38 PM > > Subject: Re: Child processes on datanodes/task trackers > > > > Use jps to find out pid of the Child. > > Then use this to find out which job the Child belongs to: > > ps aux | grep > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, C J wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wanted to know why I see running Child processes on my datanodes even > > > though > > > there is no job running at that time. Are these left over from failed > > > attempts? > > > > > > Is there anything I can do to keep these clean? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Deepika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0-1426679418-1282884627=:4590-- From general-return-2076-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 05:20:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8896 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 05:20:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 05:20:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 12721 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 05:20:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 05:19:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12401 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 05:19:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:19:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:19:49 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so2396730eyd.35 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:19:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yubnqvOxH5wghrCpYkYGbKsY6Wx8HEC3NSs/FNvj738=; b=QcoFSqzQg6z/IInaGr0yOKrk4k+dW6/diNdhd4yX4LvsgmFfW8lpBOs36W4g9Eg3iv ivOPwXsOysTIO6jMOj/Lt5GnUf76aA8rh/iLRHX6QukyU5vD0t0etV9zwXKNtbPkxxop kFjRqaK22U0Beo1Nc6IHXCva937mg7zyK8zCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hmfh+jC4nHk9/CqQWAp4Tvd74IzfwqI4hjztG+MoWSi5lIfA0AnGWxBgGnpnRf+ACU cUU9WR4Ub69UMxlCMoVtIaItvwfZOtD2PmeAO4aKO/mLwtfCaBxokFkuJLmYSk42TYF2 l91kHgivuNOUg0b/KVZSSh1UxcvlO4Nda7PKw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.109.9 with SMTP id h9mr462234ebp.33.1282886368497; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.18.68 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:19:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:19:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 From general-return-2077-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 06:47:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33534 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 06:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 06:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 71614 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 06:47:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71123 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 06:47:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71107 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 06:47:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:47:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:47:47 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1148845wwd.29 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ddKGJqDpLsb4Igbiv3u/FDIdt1iQD4WheSD2pSXi9rc=; b=EqygR/2kEN+5r9bhYDsWH+lOHVo+y01YfQXvBORhMX3IlLuQKfptotj9havtpIPsGx gbwXwgdc+nQNIR9UbuOsiT1B2b7MFLN8djzfldGJC0PdFIQ4blBeJ9CLYhwVnpfS3peZ yVlp5YoeDlKqxP4WH6EBeY3pybBFOpTyUj6VM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ITEsaK8d/sWhr2iMoYynlfG/SZoXtJwJZT6XWYuUF//g7ja0qj9ctiGelKG7ez03fi Xwur0fBJlMy2EkHu9DmC5kNOc9W9m/MY6ZOi+61fFW6P1ywyH3FqPRLnHwwWkkkDxtU8 4lR9nbv5efC8LrYptDtUxEHqfcb9AGaJUfrhY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.1.18 with SMTP id 18mr353588wec.24.1282891641880; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.132 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:47:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:17:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run fsck. From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d31739981e9048ec87cfb --0016364d31739981e9048ec87cfb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , thanks for reply. Msg says that "The filesystem under path '/' is CORRUPT" Whole msg is :- [hadoop@vmlinux3 bin]$ hadoop fsck / . /home/hadoop/mapred/system/jobtracker.info: CORRUPT block blk_-4797974583768874015 /home/hadoop/mapred/system/jobtracker.info: MISSING 1 blocks of total size = 4 B.Status: CORRUPT Total size: 4 B Total dirs: 8 Total files: 1 Total blocks (validated): 1 (avg. block size 4 B) ******************************** CORRUPT FILES: 1 MISSING BLOCKS: 1 MISSING SIZE: 4 B CORRUPT BLOCKS: 1 ******************************** Minimally replicated blocks: 0 (0.0 %) Over-replicated blocks: 0 (0.0 %) Under-replicated blocks: 0 (0.0 %) Mis-replicated blocks: 0 (0.0 %) Default replication factor: 1 Average block replication: 0.0 Corrupt blocks: 1 Missing replicas: 0 Number of data-nodes: 1 Number of racks: 1 The filesystem under path '/' is CORRUPT [hadoop@vmlinux3 bin]$ Vaibhav Negi On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Galloway, Michael D. wrote: > As said earlier try: > > hadoop fsck / > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Vaibhav Negi [mailto:vaibhav.negi@one97.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 07:22 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log > or run fsck. > > Hi , > > I am using hadoop version : 0.20.2 . I am getting this error message. > > WARNING : There are about 1 missing blocks. Please check the log or run > fsck. > > What to do? Is there any problem in the cluster > > > > Regards > > Vaibhav Negi > Software Engineer=96 Engineering. > One97 Communications Ltd > P: +91 11 46500197 Extn:461 > M: + 91 9582259332 > > Let=92s Get Talking! > --0016364d31739981e9048ec87cfb-- From general-return-2078-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 13:56:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55776 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 13:56:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 13:56:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 82528 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 13:56:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82094 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 13:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82086 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 13:56:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:56:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:56:29 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o7RDXOAq028971 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:33:24 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6054031CB6A6 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:56:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id S32JVvUbVRHZFGOc for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:56:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o7RDu7nB021643 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:56:08 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:56:07 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:56:07 -0500 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Index: ActFoXCxwz6pYLsJQfGVMca97f+FnwATiLfw Message-ID: References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 +1 The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2079-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 17:25:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15337 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 17:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 17:25:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 82168 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 17:25:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81938 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81929 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:25:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:24:40 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so2933719bwz.35 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.132 with SMTP id x4mr748037bks.50.1282929860210; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.179.74 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:24:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote= : > The Hive development community voted and passed the following resolution.= The details of the vote is at > > http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU > > The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of 8/24/2010)= with Namit Jain being the chair. > > Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. > > Thanks, > Ashish > > Draft Resolution to be sent to the Apache Board > ----------------------------------------------- > > Establish the Apache Hive Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the bes= t > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to parallel analysis of larg= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hive Project"= , > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hive= " be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the c= hair > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache Hive Project, and to have primary responsib= ility > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache Hive Project; and be it furt= her > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be an= d > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Namit Jain (namit@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * John Sichi (jvs@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Zheng Shao (zshao@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Edward Capriolo (appodictic@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Raghotham Murthy (rsm@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ning Zhang (nzhang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Paul Yang (pauly@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * He Yongqiang (he yongqiang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Prasad Chakka (prasadc@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Joydeep Sen Sarma (jsensarma@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ashish Thusoo (athusoo@apache.org) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Namit Jain > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hive= , to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificati= on, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Hive PMC be and hereby = is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in= the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the A= pache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop Hive sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apa= che > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hive sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2080-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Aug 27 19:32:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54102 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 19:32:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2010 19:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 45262 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 19:32:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45143 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2010 19:32:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45135 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2010 19:32:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:32:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdixon@omniti.com designates 8.8.38.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [8.8.38.6] (HELO edge.omniti.com) (8.8.38.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:32:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=omniti.com; s=s1024; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@omniti.com; t=1282937517; h=From:Subject:Date:To; bh=RMTKPw5KG9HiDTSd83mha4tbgbmrkkMMt+p2rtWdTiw=; b=GSPGPfILUnJxRpaU0OwTIzRVaznh3uLnaioM/tn10y/cSjuLyCMoG3sAi2lYWjH0 M73dFqCp8GOwxrTYdOku0u/U8AMGHvKz67PsluBfUziA7GX6EIDGFbBApTG60xZR IkKSrKiU/iFsArb2tn2t87G8OtGdCjMrvY1P14CAz0I=; Authentication-Results: edge smtp.user=jdixon@omniti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [68.55.0.29] ([68.55.0.29:61371] helo=omniti.com) by edge (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r(37468M)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 6B/37-03409-DA2187C4; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:31:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:31:53 -0400 From: Jason Dixon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Surge 2010 Early Registration ends Tuesday! Message-ID: <20100827193153.GW1736@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Early Bird Registration for Surge Scalability Conference 2010 ends next Tuesday, August 31. We have a killer lineup of speakers and architects from across the Internet. Listen to experts talk about the newest methods and technologies for scaling your Web presence. http://omniti.com/surge/2010/register This year's event is all about the challenges faced (and overcome) in real-life production architectures. Meet the engineering talent from some of the best and brightest throughout the Internet: John Allspaw, Etsy Theo Schlossnagle, OmniTI Bryan Cantrill, Joyent Rasmus Lerdorf, creator of PHP Tom Cook, Facebook Benjamin Black, fast_ip Christopher Brown, Opscode Artur Bergman, Wikia Baron Schwartz, Percona Paul Querna, Cloudkick Surge 2010 takes place at the Tremont Grand Historic Venue on Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Register NOW for the Early Bird discount and guarantee your seat to this year's event! -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdixon@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 From general-return-2081-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 29 00:38:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66033 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 91651 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 00:38:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91571 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 00:38:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91563 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 00:38:18 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:38:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:37:55 +0000 Received: from deimos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889EC382CA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by deimos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:37:34 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:37:32 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:37:36 -0400 Subject: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Topic: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Index: ActHEmC8HENHqb99T9qjQYtdk2eNqg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15062025E5AC2miranda_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15062025E5AC2miranda_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've always d= one that by doing the following - 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the clu= ster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) , but = if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I know I am = missing something. Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to cop= y it over all machines in the cluster? Thanks, Deepika --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15062025E5AC2miranda_-- From general-return-2082-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 29 05:40:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38789 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 05:40:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 05:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 72477 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 05:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71991 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 05:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71982 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 05:40:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:40:31 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so948391wwd.29 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iUUWNngbFZekY1WfiUr87lPjqKK5C1bk3fRuyD9HsiU=; b=dqhiIOfgbaBQHv9Lb9mSND02cOsBu6NNsn/DNhQONPUuuI0dAP1R2RlBkJ1S5PMhtG cjE40dnky7gOL8Gl/5POU344je9OHh/5goTsKM5/p8BDhmsd1ypDzJzW+1f4C/FfVfBT GSvK9+L6PW3ZkIiWjZzEuN3usLW6LA3miIp1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ic7+zyoI78Pb6Pk7M9qdn4C5JbABgFFT2p5PBJzdL+wB1J+PTbTpcq/tRpTJWjMnQk 7a8DBbM+t/a7Wlv7DXuF1ww1Cnxzu+1ZsEPMysYb9ZoLfP8hD83BtCr4FbEqiCknhE9M Oqv9KWATygqHa3u/e2R+8F8wTPibyxazkIQok= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.70 with SMTP id a6mr3014507wbx.163.1283060411453; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.0.66 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:40:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:10:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636416ae10cd1ba048eefc879 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636416ae10cd1ba048eefc879 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Deepika, You just have to run the following command on any of the cluster node HADOOP_HOME/bin/hadoop jar this command will automatically copy the jar on all the tasktrackers. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Deepika Khera wrote: > Hi, > > I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've always > done that by doing the following - > > 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes > 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. > > Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the > cluster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) , > but if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I know I > am missing something. > > Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to > copy it over all machines in the cluster? > > Thanks, > Deepika > -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. --001636416ae10cd1ba048eefc879-- From general-return-2083-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 29 06:16:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48705 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 06:16:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 06:16:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 86290 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 06:16:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85857 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 06:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85844 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 06:16:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:16:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:16:11 +0000 Received: from deimos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAA8382C7 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:15:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by deimos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:15:43 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:15:41 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:15:45 -0400 Subject: RE: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Topic: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Index: ActHPLsrt9GRUhcoQ0KmvjiQovbR+gABH7kg Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks. I had tried running the command as you suggested but got a ClassNot= FoundException exception(for the mapper class) in the task trackers. I did = a=20 bin/hadoop jar /root/myjob.jar (Already had the main class defined in manifest) There is probably something else that I am doing wrong. Appreciate your help. Thanks, Deepika -----Original Message----- From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani [mailto:cpbhagtani@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 10:40 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Deepika, You just have to run the following command on any of the cluster node HADOOP_HOME/bin/hadoop jar this command will automatically copy the jar on all the tasktrackers. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Deepika Khera wrote= : > Hi, > > I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've always > done that by doing the following - > > 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes > 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. > > Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the > cluster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) , > but if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I know= I > am missing something. > > Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to > copy it over all machines in the cluster? > > Thanks, > Deepika > --=20 Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. From general-return-2084-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Aug 29 07:50:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83768 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 07:50:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 07:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 22587 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 07:50:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22148 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 07:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22140 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 07:50:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:50:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:50:22 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1051054wwd.29 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=34fQlbAX2ijQ3KsMiCbyIOrU8zkoriSgWM+cLc1A/RY=; b=UPisZgbnHEfwqbjtMiaLQoBxp6kL1pbzU0YRj1Ejaw/puC8M7mu32v/pzjUDBOix+U 8Pytl0f7AG8chwxWsggOCCCZG2LMzeCcWfvodHj1+IJJ2qSs2V1gUuBi9yKJPmuHxN3q jMzS2jJGJ7ARHEBkyQjvmBz7UWmbg3uLXjbgo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Fd2UsGuR4/FIeU9N3d+Cr8/iqMAjMw9PH5J8ilfqCNFxaGNzMfXrdUTIT2WGWp2cEK pFMSmZNeia+CgEj25ZOyaFhcqnpzNIfSq0b3Z03zPTXkyCHIYF34VCL0HRc53aviXxGj HOlKi8FFGe2ipllZGJGMB4g6IHPlppWFTcx50= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.130 with SMTP id 2mr3248874wex.100.1283068198470; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.0.66 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:49:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:19:58 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d1da1314755048ef19871 --0016364d1da1314755048ef19871 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 check whether the user from which you are running the job has permissions on the jar or the jar is properly generated i.e. the class is present in the jar or not On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Deepika Khera wrote: > Thanks. I had tried running the command as you suggested but got a > ClassNotFoundException exception(for the mapper class) in the task trackers. > I did a > > bin/hadoop jar /root/myjob.jar > > (Already had the main class defined in manifest) > > There is probably something else that I am doing wrong. > > Appreciate your help. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani [mailto:cpbhagtani@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 10:40 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster > > Deepika, > > You just have to run the following command on any of the cluster node > > HADOOP_HOME/bin/hadoop jar > > this command will automatically copy the jar on all the tasktrackers. > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Deepika Khera >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've always > > done that by doing the following - > > > > 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes > > 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. > > > > Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the > > cluster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) , > > but if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I know > I > > am missing something. > > > > Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to > > copy it over all machines in the cluster? > > > > Thanks, > > Deepika > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. > -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. --0016364d1da1314755048ef19871-- From general-return-2085-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 06:52:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34663 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 06:52:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 06:52:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 81764 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 06:52:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81290 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 06:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81183 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 06:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:52:22 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so8064062wyf.35 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iG2/IzRQqw5Eeiqa+Mw44OIHc6k/qKlnn7KUdBkHs/8=; b=xIR/cZKauN7DVQ8sLta4OgV99S6wkJJ/JO7Sc3cmwYN+0edDSFQWFYwZL8a4i69kOO AWI0gJBja/9/fRg2SNfR+staaTu0xWB1M5ocImFWGUvupBVfBkdRRDIYEGLhV0PVEcMa ysfW92WKoTQ7LQ4TBCjIkZs1I3cnzCx+uWHUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dW06uN2IvJeTIs6zuBeO9WcRuVQ1sbtwnvaawB+KuHLXaTJTPA6NnRQMuSxs/Dg/bc M27Ns3rlbHl8ozzbdHoYWVKlVWya3Gz9sxeuvHRsd45JtszVmQPI50qV1Tgr0MzznqBW NlO+iszB3FNsCDA1OTgfOrTf/r8vIuzJHeKvU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.195 with SMTP id s45mr4493819wek.43.1283151121358; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.132 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:22:01 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop Shutdown Problems From: vaibhav negi To: user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b668ac83d2c048f04e6f0 --0016367b668ac83d2c048f04e6f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi , I am running hadoop 0.20.2 . with 2 node cluster. I executed script stop-all.sh . But still 2 line logs are getting created every hour in log directory of name node log directory. How to completely shutdown hadoop cluster. Below is the 1 line log. 2010-08-29 00:30:00,018 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server. namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel ip=/10.0.8.47 cmd=listStatus src=/user dst=null perm=null Vaibhav Negi --0016367b668ac83d2c048f04e6f0-- From general-return-2086-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 07:35:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50108 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 07:35:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 07:35:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 19607 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 07:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19119 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 07:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19098 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 07:35:46 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:35:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:35:23 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so3824760eyd.35 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:35:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L7rt3iLg+U91bWBWtUbTaJY5lORs60frxgUodmaIK9c=; b=BSuxG6+KLTVRDplIVU1WqpUJl18SpPAUuh8E28F1r9Vl4Ot4LX7m/UPPfKVjXErnlH Pn93yV09KI5ccOIL8YL51sYp6BYmmXoyV1gUs9vJEcz13ETxgyYGFS1ubrcuD0qRcs6E OSEqrQQn4UGlFeIh+9O53Z4PBUkPXX9vbboWk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jOnvKljAs7cxlDtkaYXAzojGCtje/1D27RcONP6TPIKtbhEzitnEIloeOFKtZ/rxZ9 wznFcR9nABEOSRd02RhuoUowUIZBqnKKjVnCrJrNUweBMyQFlWnNPpBxNla6O+6j/f+z pYjfiiTn1Qtk6baEd04OkucORTXWcNsFZzQks= Received: by 10.227.129.149 with SMTP id o21mr4333489wbs.176.1283153702231; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:35:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.197 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:34:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:04:42 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Shutdown Problems To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Maybe the user who issues stop-all.sh does not have permissions to terminate the process of NN (and some other, depending on who/what started it). Check jps listing after stopping and with some ps/top checks, switch to the proper user and issue a stop-all again? You can also issue it a SIGTERM I believe. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, vaibhav negi wr= ote: > Hi , > > I am running hadoop 0.20.2 . with 2 node cluster. > I executed script stop-all.sh . But still 2 line logs are getting created > every hour in log directory of name node log directory. > How to completely shutdown hadoop cluster. > Below is the 1 line log. > > > 2010-08-29 00:30:00,018 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server. > namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=3Droot,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,whee= l > ip=3D/10.0.8.47 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cmd=3DlistStatus =A0src=3D/user =A0 =A0 = =A0 dst=3Dnull > perm=3Dnull > > > Vaibhav Negi > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2087-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 08:42:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66140 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 08:42:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 08:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 70969 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 08:42:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70537 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 08:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70528 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 08:42:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:42:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of angushe@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:41:50 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so3898992eyd.35 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:41:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lxrnzaHVZhuC04Cyo8lCvre+l+Hljddiw+QWFGtv+fg=; b=dgA6kMy2PRJXPUE9J4888vGj6Y2ePtynP37lJ0SzMsyJQqEVOgg+cFsguWKvQyWoMM 7LWZPrbI4YAvtwYIlvAvdcY4eiU88dgwzD5Xz3aAXZODypJZrnzqlyrffzA5pVYoRTV+ Eq4S/L40j+i+gOm7TRqB9akUFjUkyCSSNYHc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vVPpeu0nMOtDM/uAoyjaofASRPzV135N55FP/pcmncl8E3PT7YwgmpqVdaOjwU8wuC wZFIShtnKv663ivRqaYJrNHZNVZCPXhnFrhMPP/c3zskAdzdu/wFq/ujRFw/RkCfCWfi M182YFJfpfFoglw+CitzdbjEJnTZRZ9Td2e4I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.146.142 with SMTP id h14mr4758181wbv.25.1283157689873; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.159.4 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:41:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:41:29 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster From: Angus He To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Did the Job.setJarByClass get called? If not, just add it and take another try. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Deepika Khera wrote: > Thanks. I had tried running the command as you suggested but got a ClassNotFoundException exception(for the mapper class) in the task trackers. I did a > > bin/hadoop jar /root/myjob.jar > > (Already had the main class defined in manifest) > > There is probably something else that I am doing wrong. > > Appreciate your help. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani [mailto:cpbhagtani@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 10:40 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster > > Deepika, > > You just have to run the following command on any of the cluster node > > HADOOP_HOME/bin/hadoop jar > > this command will automatically copy the jar on all the tasktrackers. > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Deepika Khera wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've always >> done that by doing the following - >> >> 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes >> 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. >> >> Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the >> cluster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) , >> but if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I know I >> am missing something. >> >> Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to >> copy it over all machines in the cluster? >> >> Thanks, >> Deepika >> > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. > -- Regards Angus From general-return-2088-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 09:54:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85787 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 09:54:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 09:54:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 24594 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 09:54:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24160 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 09:54:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24147 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 09:54:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:54:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:53:53 +0000 Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so3981327eyd.35 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:53:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ydi6qIvfKs+aWsCjVT+ytR84UIzGFgBsljFdAGr5TgQ=; b=xzei54uFGvCVxkH+qxfJy3OW61QOe8CvY8/VbVhQOp5H0yKM0MNlJ1fDOJAY7Ry6RT D/B/hbKRAqV3xLPzbVEKw0oQsYltM5SLOQaamqOVsTyFBsRn3rpGS4g4DrnB+5O2nE3S Ei/jHchp6f7gkRkfYDatIC9ZfxtnyaX9Y8I3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=m4u52H6WvJ6gOwbMhU5cmNH7ezm2kNZHT6MBK40HJrXIRqjz2xhWrmDXass+SZV9F0 aUPPYksE49An8FvXnsTqufdtk9M4wXLJv6eerzzJVHx/lWc/dnm5UiVX3XCDMjyyriKn 90DI9WLlX0QaMi/7KfMJySooUu2ltn0q4LwyY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.75 with SMTP id p11mr4729092wbu.27.1283162013604; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.132 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:53:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:23:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Shutdown Problems From: vaibhav negi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f7fe029d0c048f07704f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e659f7fe029d0c048f07704f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Harsh, thanks for reply. actually the problem was that hadoop was not started correctly but the port was bound. and after making corrections, as the port was not available, i was getting problems. Solved now Thanks and Regards Vaibhav Negi On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Maybe the user who issues stop-all.sh does not have permissions to > terminate the process of NN (and some other, depending on who/what > started it). Check jps listing after stopping and with some ps/top > checks, switch to the proper user and issue a stop-all again? > > You can also issue it a SIGTERM I believe. > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, vaibhav negi > wrote: > > Hi , > > > > I am running hadoop 0.20.2 . with 2 node cluster. > > I executed script stop-all.sh . But still 2 line logs are getting created > > every hour in log directory of name node log directory. > > How to completely shutdown hadoop cluster. > > Below is the 1 line log. > > > > > > 2010-08-29 00:30:00,018 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server. > > namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel > > ip=/10.0.8.47 cmd=listStatus src=/user dst=null > > perm=null > > > > > > Vaibhav Negi > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --0016e659f7fe029d0c048f07704f-- From general-return-2089-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 20:42:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24625 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 20:42:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 20:42:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 24569 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 20:42:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24507 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 20:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24499 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 20:42:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:42:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hc.busy@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:41:58 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so6502916qwk.35 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Sd7jYb8voezyKURgnoKI8siDaIiv3QodfH8LkVinfAM=; b=mLAM/yaL7UxELcsjN1xcjthefxYB1EU+kZut7HW/R5Lyi+41bvumPVpbSX5g12JiDQ rvlxQr57NljblNxk9ROKTLmEGxBSrSER5fgOLNPZEcYLPUSSqh22mX6v8V70RYp6VtwC wtHITIW62dTwbntktOzqIvP7AkaOLO3xk/pew= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jVSW3qTqIq41tbztP4EkkAjyIecHNrUZyxq+d7zNcihCnDDSNlt6zrKUmPZV3Lv68P oAR7F81WlXQQ/TdeGJpAtETYPDPDey8o147tEThKboxbJTf4ciaGE5P7iMiT+tN/9VER +Gor5wRYPdnMaqt8QXhFaax7lYKyRpyNaZevI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.44.144 with SMTP id a16mr3242622qaf.257.1283200891733; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.40.140 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:41:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:41:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: hc busy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9b09fb53caa9048f107d13 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f9b09fb53caa9048f107d13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1, Congrads on the near unanimous vote for progress. Btw, can somebody tell me what the change was from March when this was discussed and now? At that time, every one seem to have felt that Pig can only handle Hadoop as backend and doesn't make sense for it to become a TLP by itself. In fact, I remember a ticket to remove the possibility of a different backend. What did I miss? 1.) Technically, what developments/or future plans make it a separate project from Hadoop? (Other backend support?) 2.) What are the non-technical factors that changed since March that made this vote possible? (Donation from large company?) 3.) Can I make tax deductible contributions to the Apache Pig Project ? Alan Gates to pig-dev show details Mar 19 You have probably heard by now that there is a discussion going on in the Hadoop PMC as to whether a number of the subprojects (Hbase, Avro, Zookeeper, Hive, and Pig) should move out from under the Hadoop umbrella and become top level Apache projects (TLP). This discussion has picked up recently since the Apache board has clearly communicated to the Hadoop PMC that it is concerned that Hadoop is acting as an umbrella project with many disjoint subprojects underneath it. They are concerned that this gives Apache little insight into the health and happenings of the subproject communities which in turn means Apache cannot properly mentor those communities. The purpose of this email is to start a discussion within the Pig community about this topic. Let me cover first what becoming TLPwould mean for Pig, and then I'll go into what options I think we as a community have. Becoming a TLP would mean that Pig would itself have a PMC that would report directly to the Apache board. Who would be on the PMC would be something we as a community would need to decide. Common options would be to say all active committers are on the PMC, or all active committers who have been a committer for at least a year. We would also need to elect a chair of the PMC. This lucky person would have no additional power, but would have the additional responsibility of writing quarterly reports on Pig's status for Apache board meetings, as well as coordinating with Apache to get accounts for new committers, etc. For more information see http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles Becoming a TLP would not mean that we are ostracized from the Hadoop community. We would continue to be invited to Hadoop Summits, HUGs, etc. Since all Pig developers and users are by definition Hadoop users, we would continue to be a strong presence in the Hadoop community. I see three ways that we as a community can respond to this: 1) Say yes, we want to be a TLP now. 2) Say yes, we want to be a TLP, but not yet. We feel we need more time to mature. If we choose this option we need to be able to clearly articulate how much time we need and what we hope to see change in that time. 3) Say no, we feel the benefits for us staying with Hadoop outweigh the drawbacks of being a disjoint subproject. If we choose this, we need to be able to say exactly what those benefits are and why we feel they will be compromised by leaving the Hadoop project. There may other options that I haven't thought of. Please feel free to suggest any you think of. Questions? Thoughts? Let the discussion begin. Alan. Reply Forward Reply Alan Gates to pig-dev show details Mar 31 So far I haven't seen any feedback on this. Apache has asked the Hadoop PMC to submit input in April on whether some subprojects should be promoted to TLPs. We, the Pig community, need to give feedback to the Hadoop PMC on how we feel about this. Please make your voice heard. So now I'll head my own call and give my thoughts on it. The biggest advantage I see to being a TLP is a direct connection to Apache. Right now all of the Pig team's interaction with Apache is through the Hadoop PMC. Being directly connected to Apache would benefit Pig team members who would have a better view into Apache. It would also raise our profile in Apache and thus make other projects more aware of us. However, I am concerned about loosing Pig's explicit connection to Hadoop. This concern has a couple of dimensions. One, Hadoop and MapReduce are the current flavor of the month in computing. Given that Pig shares a name with the common farm animal, it's hard to be sure based on search statistics. But Google trends shows that "hadoop" is searched on much more frequently than "hadoop pig" or "apache pig" (see http://www.google.com/trends?q=hadoop%2Chadoop+pig). I am guessing that most Pig users come from Hadoop users who discover Pig via Hadoop's website. Loosing that subproject tab on Hadoop's front page may radically lower the number of users coming to Pig to check out our project. I would argue that this benefits Hadoop as well, since high level languages like Pig Latin have the potential to greatly extend the user base and usability of Hadoop. Two, being explicitly connected to Hadoop keeps our two communities aware of each others needs. There are features proposed for MR that would greatly help Pig. By staying in the Hadoop community Pig is better positioned to advocate for and help implement and test those features. The response to this will be that Pig developers can still subscribe to Hadoop mailing lists, submit patches, etc. That is, they can still be part of the Hadoop community. Which reinforces my point that it makes more sense to leave Pig in the Hadoop community since Pig developers will need to be part of that community anyway. Finally, philosophically it makes sense to me that projects that are tightly connected belong together. It strikes me as strange to have Pig as a TLP completely dependent on another TLP. Hadoop was originally a subproject of Lucene. It moved out to be a TLP when it became obvious that Hadoop had become independent of and useful apart from Lucene. Pig is not in that position relative to Hadoop. So, I'm -1 on Pig moving out. But this is a soft -1. I'm open to being persuaded that I'm wrong or my concerns can be addressed while still having Pig as a TLP. Alan. - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Dmitriy Ryaboy to pig-dev show details Mar 31 Over time, Pig is increasing its coupling to Hadoop (for good reasons), rather than decreasing it. If and when Pig becomes a viable entity without hadoop around, it might make sense as a TLP. As is, I think becoming a TLP will only introduce unnecessary administrative and bureaucratic headaches. So my vote is also -1. -Dmitriy - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Invite Dmitriy Ryaboy to chat Reply Thejas Nair to pig-dev, Dmitriy show details Apr 2 I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project of hadoop. -Thejas - Show quoted text - Reply Reply to all Forward Reply Santhosh Srinivasan to pig-dev, Dmitriy show details Apr 3 I see this as a multi-part question. Looking back at some of the significant roadmap/existential questions asked in the last 12 months, I see the following: 1. With the introduction of SQL, what is the philosophy of Pig (I sent an email about this approximately 9 months ago) 2. What is the approach to support backward compatibility in Pig (Alan had sent an email about this 3 months ago) 3. Should Pig be a TLP (the current email thread). Here is my take on answering the aforementioned questions. The initial philosophy of Pig was to be backend agnostic. It was designed as a data flow language. Whenever a new language is designed, the syntax and semantics of the language have to be laid out. The syntax is usually captured in the form of a BNF grammar. The semantics are defined by the language creators. Backward compatibility is then a question of holding true to the syntax and semantics. With Pig, in addition to the language, the Java APIs were exposed to customers to implement UDFs (load/store/filter/grouping/row transformation etc), provision looping since the language does not support looping constructs and also support a programmatic mode of access. Backward compatibility in this context is to support API versioning. Do we still intend to position as a data flow language that is backend agnostic? If the answer is yes, then there is a strong case for making Pig a TLP. Are we influenced by Hadoop? A big YES! The reason Pig chose to become a Hadoop sub-project was to ride the Hadoop popularity wave. As a consequence, we chose to be heavily influenced by the Hadoop roadmap. Like a good lawyer, I also have rebuttals to Alan's questions :) 1. Search engine popularity - We can discuss this with the Hadoop team and still retain links to TLP's that are coupled (loosely or tightly). 2. Explicit connection to Hadoop - I see this as logical connection v/s physical connection. Today, we are physically connected as a sub-project. Becoming a TLP, will not increase/decrease our influence on the Hadoop community (think Logical, Physical and MR Layers :) 3. Philosophy - I have already talked about this. The tight coupling is by choice. If Pig continues to be a data flow language with clear syntax and semantics then someone can implement Pig on top of a different backend. Do we intend to take this approach? I just wanted to offer a different opinion to this thread. I strongly believe that we should think about the original philosophy. Will we have a Pig standards committee that will decide on the changes to the language (think C/C++) if there are multiple backend implementations? I will reserve my vote based on the outcome of the philosophy and backward compatibility discussions. If we decide that Pig will be treated and maintained like a true language with clear syntax and semantics then we have a strong case to make it into a TLP. If not, we should retain our existing ties to Hadoop and make Pig into a data flow language for Hadoop. Santhosh - Show quoted text - Reply Reply to all Forward Reply Ashutosh Chauhan to pig-dev show details Apr 4 I concur with Santhosh here. I think main question we need to answer here is how close our ties are with Hadoop currently and how it will be in future ? When Pig was originally designed the intent was to keep it backend neutral, so much so that there was a reference backend implementation (also known as local engine) which had nothing to do with Hadoop. But things have changed since then. Hadoop's local mode is adopted in favor of Pig's own local mode. We have moved from being backend agnostic to hadoop favoring. And while this was happening, it seems we tried to keep Pig Latin language independent of hadoop backend while Pig runtime started to make use of hadoop concepts. Apart from design decisions, this move also has a practical impact on our codebase. Since we adopted Hadoop more closely, we got rid of an extra layer of abstraction and instead started using similar abstractions already existing in Hadoop. This has a positive impact that it simplified the codebase and provides tighter integration with Hadoop. So, if we are continuing in a direction where Hadoop is our only backend (or atleast a favored one), close ties to Hadoop are useful because of the reasons Alan and Dmitriy pointed out. if not, then I think moving out to TLP makes sense. Since, there is no efforts which I am aware of, is trying to plug in a different backend for Pig, I think maintaining close ties with Hadoop is useful for Pig. In future when there is a different distributed computing platform comes up which we want to use as backend, we can revisit our decision. So, as for things stand today I am -1 to move out of Hadoop. And I would also like to reiterate my point that though Pig runtime may continue to get closer to Hadoop, we shall keep Pig Latin completely backend agnostic. Ashutosh - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Invite Ashutosh Chauhan to chat Reply hc busy to pig-dev show details Apr 5 This is awesome!!! As much as I hate PJM's for wasting time at all the places that I've worked at, I think formalizing the management group(PMC) to openly and clearly determine feature roadmap and dev schedule is the best thing pig can have. I once commented to my co-worker (also heavy pig user) that pig's organization (with all due respect to all you hardworking people) is like a pigsty! documentations all over the place, javadocs from three versions ago, much of the documentation doesn't match actual features... links to the download page is broken. If you look at cascading's website... it's so much cleaner. (Of course... we still use pig because it works well) I think as TLP, pig will receive better marketing and better support in a way that will propel it both in popularity and in the amount of support it receives. As a user, that change will be good for me. - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Pradeep Kamath to pig-dev show details Apr 5 I agree with Ashutosh and Santhosh. Just based on the current direction of the project I think we are more closely tied with Hadoop now (with Pig 0.7, our load/store interfaces are very closely tied with Hadoop) - hence for now my vote would be a -1 to be a TLP - if there is change in that direction/philosophy to be really backend agnostic I think we should revisit this question. Pradeep -----Original Message----- From: Ashutosh Chauhan [mailto:ashutosh.chauhan@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:11 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Alan Gates to pig-dev show details Apr 5 I agree that Pig's code documentation is in sad shape. I think our user documentation for each release is good, of limited. I hope that our documents on wiki (such as PigJournal) help people understand our roadmap. Please let us know if you disagree so we can find ways to improve it. That said, it isn't clear to me how Pig being a TLP will solve that. The current committers or some subset thereof (see original message) would become the PMC. Other than having expanded powers to vote on releases and who becomes new committers, the role of these new PMC members would not change much. They won't have anymore time to address documentation and communication issues. We need to find a way to address those no matter what governance framework or community Pig is in. Alan. - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Alan Gates to pig-dev show details Apr 5 Prognostication is a difficult business. Of course I'd love it if someday there is an ISO Pig Latin committee (with meetings in cool exotic places) deciding the official standard for Pig Latin. But that seems like saying in your start up's business plan, "When we reach Google's size, then we'll do x". If there ever is an ISO Pig Latin standard it will be years off. As others have noted, staying tight to Hadoop now has many advantages, both in technical and adoption terms. Hence my advocacy of keeping Pig Latin Hadoop agnostic while tightly integrating the backend. Which is to say that in my view, Pig is Hadoop specific now, but there may come a day when that is no longer true. Whether Pig will ever move past just running on Hadoop to running in other parallel systems won't be known for years to come. Given that, do you think it makes sense to say that Pig stays a subproject for now, but if it someday grows beyond Hadoop only it becomes a TLP? I could agree to that stance. Alan. - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply hc busy to pig-dev show details Apr 5 I guess this is more of a suggestion for roadmap than TLP discussion, I think the PMC/committers can create a dedicate position what maintains the web/doc's. Somebody who yell and screams until the doc's are in sync with the implementation before the release. Because TLP is an elevation of status in addition to internal re-organization. I think it might to create the PR needed to attract the talents to fill in that job... - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply hc busy to pig-dev show details Apr 5 > Of course I'd love it if someday there is an ISO Pig Latin committee (with meetings in cool exotic places) deciding the official standard for Pig Latin. haha!!! Some exotic place like Yahoo's HQ in sunny Sunnyvale California? I guess it feels like it depends on the roadmap more than roadmap depends on it. In terms of positioning, a TLP would appear to potential users who are evaluating alternatives to consider it as _the_ choice as opposed to one of the choices. If the ambition is to take it there, then TLP, as useless as it may seem right now, might actually be worth the effort to attain. I mean, would you rather wait until Hive makes TLP and then play catch up? I mean, I can kinda see them doing that... - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Dmitriy Ryaboy to pig-dev show details Apr 5 The Twitter office is cushier and has more bars within stumbling distance. Just sayin'. To the subject at hand -- I don't think TLP standing has the PR value you think it does... feature set, velocity of development, adoption, flexibility, etc -- those are far more important. -Dmitriy - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Invite Dmitriy Ryaboy to chat Reply Santhosh Srinivasan to pig-dev show details Apr 5 "Given that, do you think it makes sense to say that Pig stays a subproject for now, but if it someday grows beyond Hadoop only it becomes a TLP? I could agree to that stance." Bingo! Santhosh -----Original Message----- From: Alan Gates [mailto:gates@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:37 AM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply hc busy to pig-dev show details Apr 5 >The Twitter office is cushier and has more bars within stumbling distance. Just sayin'. and strip clubs too, I gather there're a couple on Market... near civic bart stop ;-) oh... hey, you guys are at a nice place... lot's of night clubs near there too . > "Given that, do you think it makes sense to say that Pig stays a subproject for now, but if it someday grows beyond Hadoop only it becomes a TLP? I could agree to that stance." Oops, I didn't read your whole message... I think TLP could be part of the roadmap: Planned publicity, like planned pregnancy, is a good thing. And on the way there, we should add dedicated resource that updates documentation and links on the website... :-) - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Reply Daniel Dai to pig-dev show details Apr 5 I agree with the stance that we remain in Hadoop until we see more compelling reasons, such as Pig go beyond Hadoop happens. Currently I cannot fully weight the advantage and disadvantage of becoming a TLP. But provides this is a point of no return, I don't want to move unless we do have a strong motivation. We can always choose to become TLP later when we feel more convinced to that. Daniel -------------------------------------------------- From: "Santhosh Srinivasan" Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:22 PM To: Subject: RE: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project - Show quoted text - Reply Forward Invite Daniel Dai to chat On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Anant Wadhokar wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Olga Natkovich >wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > From: Alan Gates > > > Date: August 23, 2010 10:38:12 AM PDT > > > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > > Subject: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP > > > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > > > > > > I propose that Pig become a top level Apache project. > > > > > > The Pig development community has already voted on and approved this > > > proposal. In summary, the community voted that all current active > > > committers (listed at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html ) as > > > of August 18 2010 should become PMC members, and that Olga Natkovich > > > should be the PMC chair. They also agreed that adopting bylaws should > > > be among the first tasks of the new PMC. Full details of the vote can > > > be seen at http://bit.ly/c3GDyl > > > > > > Please vote on sending this proposal to the Apache Board. > > > > > > Below is a draft resolution to be sent to the Apache Board: > > > > > > Establish the Apache Pig Project > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > > > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > > > Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > > > Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > > > open-source software related to parallel analysis of large > > > data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Pig Project", > > > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > > Foundation; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby is > > > responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > > > related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > > > it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Pig" be > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > > of the Apache Pig Project, and to have primary responsibility > > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > > responsibility of the Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > > Apache Pig Project: > > > > > > * Benjamin Reed > > > * Daniel Dai > > > * Alan Gates > > > * Giridharen Kesavan > > > * Olga Natkovich > > > * Pradeep Kamath > > > * Santhosh Srinivasan > > > * Yan Zhou > > > * Jeff Zhang > > > * Ashutosh Chauhan > > > * Richard Ding > > > * Dmitriy Ryaboy > > > * Thejas Nair > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Olga Natkovich > > > be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Pig, to > > > serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > > > Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > > > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > > > or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Pig PMC be and hereby is > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the > > > Apache Pig Project; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pig Project be and hereby > > > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > > > Hadoop Pig sub-project; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > > > Hadoop Pig sub-project encumbered upon the > > > Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --00c09f9b09fb53caa9048f107d13-- From general-return-2090-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 21:15:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35006 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 21:15:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 21:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 61372 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 21:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61290 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 21:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61282 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 21:15:36 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:15:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:15:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 34468 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 21:14:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO wlan-snve-153-34.corp.yahoo.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username acmurthy, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:14:57 +0000 Message-Id: <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:14:54 -0700 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > In the interim I'd like to propose we push a hadoop-0.20-security > release off the Yahoo! patchset (http://github.com/yahoo/hadoop- > common). This will ensure the community benefits from all the work > done at Yahoo! for over 12 months *now*, and ensures that we do not > have to wait until hadoop-0.22 which has all of these patches. Since most people seemed to think of it as a reasonable idea, I'm going to create the hadoop-0.20-security branch and start the necessary work. thanks, Arun From general-return-2091-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Aug 30 22:30:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66606 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 22:30:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 22:30:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 40259 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 22:30:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40004 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 22:30:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39983 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 22:30:37 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:30:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of athusoo@facebook.com designates 69.63.178.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.178.179] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.178.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:30:15 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.179] ([10.18.255.179:57710] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta026.snc1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id 4D/C0-30338-1E03C7C4; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:29:54 -0700 Received: from SC-MBX03.TheFacebook.com ([169.254.2.176]) by sc-hub04.TheFacebook.com ([fe80::8df5:7f90:d4a0:bb9%11]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:27:47 -0700 From: Ashish Thusoo To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hive-user@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP Thread-Index: ActFWXOffgxgalakRSm+ZBxRJ3CyBgA7efAAAJK3yoA= Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:27:46 +0000 Message-ID: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037B4FA7@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> References: <09370B27F829314182C33A219530C104037ABC90@sc-mbx03.TheFacebook.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With 10 +1 votes this vote passes. Owen,=20 Please forward this to the Apache board. Thanks, Ashish=20 -----Original Message----- From: Tom White [mailto:tom@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:24 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hive as a TLP +1 Tom On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote= : > The Hive development community voted and passed the following=20 > resolution. The details of the vote is at > > http://www.bit.ly/aJogyU > > The PMC will comprise of the current committers on Hive (as of 8/24/2010)= with Namit Jain being the chair. > > Please vote on sending this resolution to the Apache Board. > > Thanks, > Ashish > > Draft Resolution to be sent to the Apache Board > ----------------------------------------------- > > Establish the Apache Hive Project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the bes= t > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to parallel analysis of larg= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 data sets for distribution at no charge to the public. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Hive Project"= , > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 related to parallel analysis of large data sets; and be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hive= " be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the c= hair > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache Hive Project, and to have primary responsib= ility > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache Hive Project; and be it furt= her > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be an= d > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of t= he > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Namit Jain (namit@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * John Sichi (jvs@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Zheng Shao (zshao@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Edward Capriolo (appodictic@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Raghotham Murthy (rsm@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ning Zhang (nzhang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Paul Yang (pauly@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * He Yongqiang (he yongqiang@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Prasad Chakka (prasadc@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Joydeep Sen Sarma (jsensarma@apache.org) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Ashish Thusoo (athusoo@apache.org) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Namit Jain > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Hive= , to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of = the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualificati= on, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Hive PMC be and hereby = is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in= the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hive Project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache Hive Project be and hereby > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the A= pache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop Hive sub-project; and be it further > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apa= che > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hive sub-project encumbered upon the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > From general-return-2092-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 31 21:42:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99206 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 21:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 21:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 64498 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 21:42:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64396 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 21:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64388 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2010 21:42:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:42:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.199] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c129.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.129]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7VLfMo7044787 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=AvRZ4tOwng33TO7G2pLgOB/P6Wb3zFLhZ1BGd6VRx+LQPi5t90t4tVLl3wD5i509 Message-Id: <351A8FBE-528C-4352-8D14-3AC913836336@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:41:22 -0700 References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:41 PM, hc busy wrote: > +1, Congrads on the near unanimous vote for progress. > > Btw, can somebody tell me what the change was from March when this was > discussed and now? At that time, every one seem to have felt that > Pig can > only handle Hadoop as backend and doesn't make sense for it to > become a TLP > by itself. In fact, I remember a ticket to remove the possibility of a > different backend. What did I miss? I can only speak for myself, but in the original discussion thread on pig-dev (http://bit.ly/byD7L8 ) I discussed why I changed my vote over the course of the last few months. > > > 1.) Technically, what developments/or future plans make it a separate > project from Hadoop? (Other backend support?) While we still want to design Pig and Pig Latin in such a way that there may be separate implementations that do not run on Hadoop, nothing in this regard has changed in the last few months. What did change is that I (and I think others) realized that being connected technically to Hadoop does not mean we need to be connected in our governance. > 2.) What are the non-technical factors that changed since March that > made > this vote possible? (Donation from large company?) Apache does not require that projects raise any finances. Pig is (as it has been) supported by the contributions of those choose to work on it and those who are paid to work on it. > 3.) Can I make tax deductible contributions to the Apache Pig > Project ? Wow, that's a huge vote of confidence. Thanks. But no. Contributions to Pig can be made (as before) in code, documentation, user feedback, etc. You can donate money to Apache itself, which goes to support the infrastructure for Pig and all Apache projects. For more info see http://apache.org/foundation/support-apache.html (I have no idea if that is tax deductible or not.) Alan. From general-return-2093-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 31 23:42:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39315 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 23:42:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 23:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 5536 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 23:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5464 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 23:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5456 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2010 23:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:42:14 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o7VNf0N0093844 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:41:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=DMzvZI+IcQ+P4kT3qOBNPZvZSTyf4vumLJFFN1iNqdOD+HIPAWykKd1+5tunr+YG Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:11:00 +0530 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:10:59 +0530 Subject: Re: hudson patch test jobs : hadoop pig and zookeeper Thread-Topic: hudson patch test jobs : hadoop pig and zookeeper Thread-Index: ActJZfd+kSBIfNKIRQqaJf8bsvbOmA== Message-ID: <2FFA136A-1495-4522-A29D-FA176722F94E@yahoo-inc.com> References: <155916E3-8F8D-4EF7-8992-4C6E3382D241@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <155916E3-8F8D-4EF7-8992-4C6E3382D241@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hudson patch test job is back UP and Running on the new hudson.apache.org m= achine. Thanks, Giri On Aug 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > We have a new hudson master hudson.apache.org and hudson.zones.apache.org= is retired. > This means that we need to port all our patch test admin jobs for hadoop(= common,hdfs,mapred), pig and zookeeper to the new hudson master. >=20 > I'm working on configuring patch admin jobs with the new hudson master: h= udson.apache.org. (this is exactly the reason for why the patch test builds= are not running at the moment) >=20 > Thanks > Giri From general-return-1597-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 04:18:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88010 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 04:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 04:18:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 9872 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 04:18:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7475 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 04:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7452 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 04:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:18:22 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o514HsKe037913; Mon, 31 May 2010 21:17:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:user-agent:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=hd77I8bcze5kghUyxPyfBDioCKCGOvfQ5uer9smerU51P0UV452G30KTqZRKBiRm Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Mon, 31 May 2010 21:16:41 -0700 From: Milind A Bhandarkar To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:16:38 -0700 Subject: First International Mapreduce Workshop 2010: Paper submission deadline July 15 , 2010 Thread-Topic: First International Mapreduce Workshop 2010: Paper submission deadline July 15 , 2010 Thread-Index: AcsBQTq6BX2rRUa9dkmwYCyERP5Z/Q== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.0.0.090609 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 First International Workshop on Theory and Practice of Mapreduce (MapRed 2010) Indianapolis, USA: Nov 30 - Dec 3, 2010 MapReduce is a programming model, introduced by Google in 2004, to simplify distributed processing of large datasets on clusters of commodity computers= . Currently, there exist several open-source implementations including Hadoop= . MapReduce became the model of choice for many web enterprises, very often being the enabler for cloud services. Recently, it also gained significant attention in scientific community for parallel data analysis e.g. Rhipe. Th= e purpose of the workshop is to discuss both theoretical and practical advances in MapReduce (or similar systems), identify open issues, present new related tools and report on scientific or industrial applications. Therefore, we are glad to invite contributions including, but not limited to: =80 Implementation/architecture of MapReduce programming model =80 Improvements and extensions =80 Optimizations e.g multi-core, GPU =80 Fault-tolerance =80 Security =80 Job scheduling =80 Environments and tools =80 Real-time extensions and applications =80 Data collection =80 Data- and Compute-intensive problems =80 MapReduce as a support for mobile services =80 Algorithms based on MapReduce paradigm =80 Applications and lessons learned =80 Scientific and industrial data analysis (including higher level languag= es based on MapReduce) =80 Cloud computing implementation and applications of MapReduce (e.g. on A= WS) Authors are invited to submit full papers of two types: - research papers at most 8 pages, - application papers at most 6 pages, including figures, tables and references using the IEEE format for conference proceedings. Accepted papers will appear in the main conference proceedings. The conference and workshop proceedings will be published by IEEE (pending). After the conference, extended and revised versions of distinguished papers will be invited for possible publication in a special issue of the Journals= : Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience Journal (Wiley, SCI-indexed) Computer Science and Technology Journal (Springer, SCI-indexed pending) Important dates =80 Submission deadline: July 15th , 2010 =80 Author notification: Aug. 10th, 2010 =80 Camera-ready manuscript: Sept. 1st, 2010 =80 Author registration: Sept. 1st, 2010 For more info: mapred2010@easychair.org Organized by the Indiana University, mapreduce.CloudCom.org Technically sponsored by the IEEE Computer Society First International Workshop on Theory and Practice of MapReduce (MAPRED'2010) Indianapolis, USA, Nov 30 =AD Dec 3, 20 Workshop/Program Chairs Milind A Bhandarkar, Yahoo!, USA Tomasz Wiktor Wlodarczyk, University of Stavanger, Norway Steering Chair Chunming Rong, University of Stavanger, Norway Technical Chair Rui Maximo Esteves, University of Stavanger, Norway Program Committee Abdulrahman Azab, University of Stavanger, Norway Aleksandar Bradic, Vast.com, USA Alexandre de Assis Bento Lima, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Chris K Wensel, Concurrent, USA Colin Evans, Metaweb Technologies, USA Eddy Caron, ENS de Lyon, France Gabriel Antoniu, INRIA, France Gilles Fedak, INRIA, France Hidemoto Nakada, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan Oleg Lodygensky, Universite Paris Sud 11, France Rui Maximo, University of Stavanger, Norway Scott Preece, Yahoo!, USA Teresa Wingfield, Datameer, USA Vadim Zaliva, Tristero Consulting, USA Xuanhua Shi, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China Zheng Shao, Facebook, USA --=20 Milind Bhandarkar Y!IM: GridSolutions Tel: 408-203-5213=20 (milindb@yahoo-inc.com) From general-return-1598-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 19:25:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84041 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 19:25:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 19:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 58855 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 19:25:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58627 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 19:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58437 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 19:25:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:25:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:25:29 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so694517pvc.35 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:25:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.237.21 with SMTP id k21mr5469623wah.141.1275420307486; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:25:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:25:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributor Meeting Minutes 05/28/2010 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I posted a link to the slides on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopContributorsMeeting20100528 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Slides attached. =A0Thanks for taking notes Chris! > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrot= e: >> This month, the MapReduce + HDFS contributor meeting was held at >> Cloudera Headquarters. >> >> Announcements for contributor meetings are here: >> http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/ >> >> Minutes follow. No decisions were made at this meeting, but the >> following issues were discussed and may presage future discussion and >> decisions on these lists. >> >> Eli, I think you have all the slides. Would you mind sending them out? -= C >> >> =3D=3D 0.21 release update =3D=3D >> * Continuing to close blockers, ping people for updates and suggestions >> * About 20 open blockers. Many are MapReduce documentation that may be >> pushed. Speak up if 0.21 is missing anything substantive. >> * Common/HDFS visibility and annotations are close to consensus; >> MapReduce annotations are committed to trunk and the 0.21 branch >> >> =3D=3D HEP proposal =3D=3D >> (what follows is the sketch presented at the meeting. A full proposal >> with concrete details will be circulated on the list) >> >> * Based on- and very similar to- the PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) P= rocess >> * Audience is HDFS and MapReduce; not necessarily adopted by other subpr= ojects >> =A0- Addresses the perception that there is friction between >> innovation/experimentation and stability >> * Not for small enhancements, features, and bug fixes. This should not >> slow down typical development or impede casual contribution to Hadoop >> * Primary mechanism for new features, collecting input, documenting >> design decisions >> * JIRA is good for details, but not for deciding on wide shifts in direc= tion >> * Purpose is for author to build consensus and gather dissenting opinion= s. >> =A0- All may comment, but Editors will review incoming HEP material >> =A0- Editors determine only whether the HEP is complete, not whether >> they believe it is a sound idea >> =A0- Editors are appointed by the PMC >> =A0- Mechanism for appointing Editors and term of service TBD >> =A0 =A0- Apache Board appoints Shepherds for projects somewhat randomly, >> to projects. A similar mechanism could work for incoming HEPs >> =A0- Proposal *may* come with code, but not necessarily. >> Drafting/baking of the HEP occurs in public on a list dedicated to >> that particular proposal. Once Editors certify the HEP as complete, it >> is sent to general@ for wider discussion. >> =A0 =A0- The discussion phase begins on general@. The mailing list exist= s >> to ensure the HEP is complete enough to present to the community. >> =A0- Some discussion on the difference between posting to general@ and >> posting to the HEP list. Completeness is, of course, subjective. If >> the Editor and Author disagree whether the proposal affects an aspect >> of the framework enough to merit special consideration, it is not >> entirely clear how to resolve the disagreement. >> =A0 =A0- In general, the role of the Editor in the community-driven >> process of Hadoop is not entirely clear. It may be possible to >> optimize it out. >> =A0- Once discussion ends, the HEP is passed (or fails to pass) by a >> vote of the PMC (mechanics undefined). In Python, the result is >> committed to the repository. A similar practice would make sense in >> Hadoop. >> * Which issues require HEPs? >> =A0- Discussion ranged. Append, backup namenode, edit log rewrite, et >> al. were examples of features substantial enough to merit a HEP. Pure >> Java CRC is an example of an enhancement that would not. Whether an >> explicit process must be in place to determine whether an issue >> requires a HEP is not clear. >> =A0- Viewing HEPs as a way of soliciting consensus for an approach >> might be more accurate. Going through the HEP process should always >> improve the chances of a successful proposal >> >> * Evaluation >> =A0- The proposal may be rejected if it is redundant with existing >> functionality, technically unsound, insufficiently motivated, no >> backwards compatibility story, etc. >> =A0- Implementation is not necessary, and is lightly discouraged. >> Feedback is less welcome once code is in hand. >> =A0- Purpose is to be clear about the acceptance criteria for that >> issue, e.g. concerns that the proposal may not scale or may harm >> performance >> =A0- Dissenting opinions must be recorded accurately. Quoting would be >> a safe practice for the Author to encourage HEP reviewers not to block >> the product of the proposal. >> >> * The testing burden and completion strategy may be ambiguous >> =A0- Whether the proposal affects scalability may not be testable by >> the implementer. Completing the proposal to address all use cases may >> require considerably more work than the Author is willing or motivated >> to invest. >> =A0- The HEP discussion on general@ should explore whether such >> objections are merited and reasonable. For example, a particularly >> obscure/esoteric use case could be included as a condition for >> acceptance if the dissenter is willing to invest the resources to >> test/validate it. The process is flexible in this regard. >> =A0 =A0- But it is not infinitely flexible. Backwards compatibility, >> performance regression, availability, and other considerations need >> not be called out in every HEP. >> =A0 =A0- Traditional concerns need to be documented. Acceptance criteria >> should ideally be automated and reproducible in different >> organizations >> >> =3D=3D Branching =3D=3D >> * A patch and a branch are isomorphic from a policy perspective. Of >> course, they are functionally distinct: branches are easier to >> collaborate on and are, generally, longer-lived than are patches. But >> special policies need not be derived to account for these differences, >> which concern the production of the code, not its review and >> acceptance. >> * Some developers find branches to be easier to review than very large >> patches and easier to merge, given a toolchain that supports this. >> =A0- Subversion currently is difficult to adapt to this model >> =A0- Could be done on a HEP-by-HEP basis, as a condition for acceptance >> * Eclipse Labs >> =A0- Branded version of Google Code (same functionality, w/ Eclipse bran= d) >> =A0- Not official Eclipse projects, but associated with Eclipse >> =A0- Apache/Hadoop may consider a similar strategy >> =A0- Distinct from Apache Labs, as one need not be a committer, follow >> its rules for releases, etc. >> >> =3D=3D Contrib =3D=3D >> * Modules (such as fuse-dfs) are not actively maintained in the main >> repository and would benefit from a release schedule decoupled from >> the rest of Hadoop >> * With few exceptions, the contrib modules have smaller, often >> discrete groups of maintainers. It may be worth exploring whether >> these projects could live elsewhere >> > From general-return-1599-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 20:19:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51417 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 20:19:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 20:19:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34992 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 20:19:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34949 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 20:19:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34941 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 20:19:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:19:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.37] (HELO n61.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:19:37 +0000 Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n61.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2010 20:19:15 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.83] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2010 20:19:15 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.110] by t3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2010 20:19:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2010 20:19:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 486020.86320.bm@omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 4714 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2010 20:19:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1275423555; bh=jG8SnY+4L3HFLpaeaAheXbEhctwP/+1jHrZJGhAMEhc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xX9J73V6jljF5FYF8HWP9itJN3kMyaLyfWtOUUz9vbGdcPOmpC4lshy/6S8xh+I5EaqEf6BvzHz+HZqFGf/U+mZbtU3o/uXi4j4iNVyBlALqKTrdQTRZrCE6izs8lebapX2NtSn2DfH3e85aBuN/RSvJ6rwbdZTuEkSLEiItwek= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ftPhDnZCdtgWZM8ZjkzNfchMXmM3u5SRgjBjNznJFnB0TAwj549DQIqqClFYraX+nHMEe40bxvMiZo5moMs9VecOtiyJL8fKjsBvv4ngTM3+we9qJUM1gD9pBXcDofgnRaj+FzE3EEYL3Uxt0lFQxvrRvKHAveJAlhtuVKoGl3U=; Message-ID: <394531.3151.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: PIUAY1IVM1lPuQvcuArOla28Ba0jFbCityJOhkh1935bxWD _GsP0YWUc78.Z8TUJenAS99Rid_Y0d3psOQ.BbRSioOhuNqGlKEpejQpuZoR tQpPeaDNASmIgONIS4ZA.cb4V_MNdlatvVhJBeO60Zi5uTdG06OtrOMIf.Mm 50HgVumkO29zAaeSSqc075PlkHbGEZIzWzp7sYncNdsgypdIdPErEsbjdf5Y b9ioNHg.dB7Emqsg8Lw6U4YJnMRGa2_OGJwjzeuXdQdAesG_PfDACEcL1iYx wP3OWoZH3rTO3hlIrCk8_gtEy5OStTrNoH3UC1cp932AfOHXNKsd16Ts1uuD qQbf605xrJ9VvHnZgkBScwGvtbDJ0mYrooL4uiKk9xCgwG7lVAONE7t5yv2K t7H2DS8HcjOzhzalwfBwFbJvoHA2giHoEjt24bk.9Efd63Zn7DBf3mN8ZMQJ ecywPWleuedccyi1JVUXA4__2.vtAmm3WfTqNl1t2UDYxnffF_ep5_KvXDcc 1RtnTf1ogyJsZEFo_0fFK8apqxyj60n_gDfeLBCRKosM_b_kT Received: from [209.116.62.98] by web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:19:15 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/374.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT) From: C J Subject: "No datanode to stop " message on stop-dfs.sh To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-421273419-1275423555=:3151" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-421273419-1275423555=:3151 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I have a brand new setup of hadoop machine cluster with 50 machines. I see some weird issues come up with the cluster with time....Things run just fine for a few days and then when I try to run stop-dfs.sh, it says no namenode to stop hadoop-07: no data node to stop hadoop-08: no data node to stop . . . hadoop-03: no secondarynamenode to stop When I go to these machines, the data node is actually running. Any idea what can cause issue like this? The last time it happened I killed all the running datanodes manually and then started the dfs. It started fine. After that even the stop-dfs.sh worked as expected. But now it got back to the same situation again. One more thing I see a lot of left over running "Child" tasks from task attempts on these machines. Appreciate any help. Thanks, C --0-421273419-1275423555=:3151-- From general-return-1600-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 21:28:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72040 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 21:28:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 21:28:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 22699 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 21:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22640 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 21:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22632 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 21:28:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:28:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:28:39 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so777973pvc.35 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:28:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.84.8 with SMTP id m8mr5724263wal.9.1275427698380; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:28:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:28:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Jeff, Blueprints (it's a launchpad thing) is more of an issue tracking system (launchpad doesn't put features/enhancements in their bug database), eg drizzle has lots of blueprints, and blueprints for cleaning up code, adding config flags, etc. We'll use jira for that kind of stuff, the HEP is for larger stuff that needs more upfront discussion. Thanks, Eli On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher w= rote: > A far more lightweight example of multi-issue feature planning in an open > source project comes from Drizzle and their "blueprints": > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/drizzle. > > Each "spec" has a drafter, an approver, and an assignee; declares the oth= er > specs on which it depends; points to the relevant branches in the source > tree and issues in the issue tracker; and has a priority, definition stat= e, > and implementation state. > > I don't know how it's working out for them in practice, but on paper it > looks quite nice. > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> > No, but I'd estimate the cost of merging at 1-2 days work a week just = to >> > pull in the code *and identify why the tests are failing*. Git may be >> better >> > at merging in changes, but if Hadoop doesn't work on my machine after = the >> > merge, I need to identify whether its my code, the merged code, some >> machine >> > quirk, etc. It's the testing that is the problem for me, not the >> > merge effort. That's the Hadoop own tests any my own functional test >> suites, >> > the ones that bring up clusters and push work through. Those are the >> > troublespots, as they do things that hadoop's own tests don't do, like= as >> > for all the JSP pages. >> >> I've lived off a git branch of common/hdfs for half a year with a big >> uncommitted patch, it's no where near 1-2 days of effort per week to >> merge in changes from trunk. If the tests are passing on trunk, and >> they fail after your merge then those are real test failures due to >> your change (and therefore should require effort). The issues with >> your internal tests failing due to changes on trunk is the same >> whether you merge or you just do an update - you have to update before >> checking in the patch anyway - so that issue is about the state of >> trunk when you merge or update, rather than about being on a branch. >> >> > >> >> Might find the >> >> following interesting: >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html >> > >> > There's a long story behind JDD's paper, I'm glad you have read it, it >> does >> > lay out what is effectively the ASF process for effecting significant >> change >> > -but it doesn't imply that's the only process for having changes. >> > >> >> Just to be clear I don't mean imply that branches are the only process >> for making changes. Interesting that this is considered the effective >> ASF process, it hasn't seemed to me that recent big features on hadoop >> have used it, only one I'm aware of that was done on a branch was >> append. >> >> > I think gradual evolution in trunk is good, it lets people play with >> what's >> > coming in. Having lots of separate branches and everyone's private >> release >> > being a merge of many patches that you choose is bad. >> >> Agreed. =A0Personally I don't think people should release from branches. >> And in practice I don't think you'll see lots of branches, people can >> and would still develop on trunk. Getting changes merged from a branch >> back to trunk before the whole branch is merged is a good thing, the >> whole branch may never be merged and that's OK too. Branches are a >> mechanism, releases are policy. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> > From general-return-1601-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 21:30:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72277 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 21:30:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 21:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 24145 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 21:30:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24084 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 21:30:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24075 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 21:30:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:30:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:29:57 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o51LTElv069777; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=rUTMKmt8VRspONtay7Lfj3Q1g3/C7E8758zXhVai3Nl3s+bCtoPjyMI9ycTGXTsf Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 14:29:14 -0700 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:28:53 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:28:53 -0700 Subject: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Bill Graham , Jiaqi Tan , Jerome Boulon , Ariel Rabkin Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? Thread-Index: AcsB0W7dgQlmbfPShEWXCOQcnrztAA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2010 21:29:14.0036 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B676F40:01CB01D1] Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should become a top-level Apache project. I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current active Chukwa committers as initial members of the project management committee (PMC) and myself, Eric Yang, as the initial chair. Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? regards, Eric ------------ X. Establish the Apache Chukwa Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to data serialization for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Chukwa Project", be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of software related to a distributed database; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Chukwa" be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Chukwa Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Chukwa Project: * Eric Yang * Ariel Rabkin * Jerome Boulon * Bill Graham * Jiaqi Tan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eric Yang be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Chukwa, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa PMC be and hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Hadoop Chukwa sub-project; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Hadoop Chukwa sub-project encumbered upon the Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. From general-return-1602-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 22:59:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93763 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 22:59:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 22:59:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 44779 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 22:59:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44741 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 22:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44733 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 22:59:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:59:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.212] (HELO qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:59:36 +0000 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id QacD1e0020bG4ec5EmzGuu; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:59:16 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Qmyy1e00F2SbwD53Pmz14E; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:59:14 +0000 Cc: Bill Graham , Jiaqi Tan , Jerome Boulon , Ariel Rabkin Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:58:57 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should become a top-level > Apache project. -1 In my opinion, the Chukwa PMC doesn't have enough experience with the Apache Way (ie. processes) to be a self-sustaining PMC. I'd be +1 for moving to Incubator. -- Owen From general-return-1603-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 23:34:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4221 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 23:34:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 23:34:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 76964 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:34:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76922 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76910 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 23:34:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:34:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:34:13 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] (tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.120.91]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o51NX52H073308; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:33:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=lbhqAenj/fPEMLT9MT8B2JmvQ7iNEA2Z+3SBm78njNqy9hBcK73kbeFIlhNugwU/ Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: From: "Owen O'Malley" To: "Owen O'Malley" In-Reply-To: <9DD2220F-023D-4E6B-88C5-F08B184B6102@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8-775241319 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Last call: ApacheCon TechTalks CFP closes today Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:33:04 -0700 References: <9DD2220F-023D-4E6B-88C5-F08B184B6102@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-8-775241319 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We've decided to extend the deadline a week to this Friday. As a =20 reminder, all speakers get two nights at the conference hotel and free =20= registration at ApacheCon. -- Owen On May 28, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > As a reminder the CFP for proposals closes today. The CFP is at = http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/date/20100428 > > -- Owen > > ApacheCon North America 2010 > 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta > > Technical Tracks: Call For Participation > All submissions must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 at midnight =20= > Pacific Time. > The official conference, trainings, and expo of The Apache Software =20= > Foundation (ASF) returns to Atlanta this November, with dozens of =20 > technical, business, and community-focused sessions at the beginner, =20= > intermediate, and advanced levels. > > Over the past decade, the ASF has gone from strength to strength, =20 > developing and shepherding nearly 150 Top-Level Projects and new =20 > initiatives in the Apache Incubator and Labs. This year's ApacheCon =20= > celebrates how Apache technologies have sparked creativity, =20 > challenged processes, streamlined development, improved =20 > collaboration, launched businesses, bolstered economies, and =20 > improved lives. > > We are proud of our achievements and recognize that the global =20 > Apache community --both developers and users-- are responsible for =20 > the success and popularity of our products. > > The ApacheCon Planning Team are soliciting 50-minute technical =20 > presentations for the next conference, which will focus on the theme =20= > =93Servers, the Cloud, and Innovation=94. > > We are particularly interested in highly-relevant, professionally-=20 > directed presentations that demonstrate specific probrlems and real-=20= > world solutions. Part of the technical program has already been =20 > planned; we welcome proposals based on the following Apache Projects =20= > and related technical areas: > > - Cassandra/NoSQL > - Content Technologies > - (Java) Enterprise Development > - Felix/OSGi > - Geronimo > - Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing > - Lucene, Mahout + friends/Search > - Tomcat > - Tuscany > Submissions are open to anyone with relevant expertise: ASF =20 > affiliation is not required to present at, attend, or otherwise =20 > participate in ApacheCon. > > Please keep in mind that whilst we encourage submissions that the =20 > highlight the use of specific Apache solutions, we are unable to =20 > accept marketing/commercially-oriented presentations. > > Other proposals, such as panels, or those longer than 50 minutes in =20= > duration have been considered in the past. You are welcome to submit =20= > an alternate presentation, however, such sessions are accepted under =20= > exceptional circumstances. Please be as descriptive as possible, =20 > including names/bios of proposed panelists and any related details. > > All accepted speakers (not co-presenters) qualify for general =20 > conference admission and a minimum of two nights lodging at the =20 > conference hotel. Additional hotel nights and travel assistance are =20= > possible, depending on the number of presentations given and type of =20= > assistance needed. > > To submit a presentation proposal, please send an email to =20 > submissions AT apachecon DOT com containing the following =20 > information in plaintext (no attachments, please): > > 1. Your full name, title, and organization > > 2. Contact information, including your address > > 3. The name of your proposed session (keep your title simple and =20 > relevant to the topic) > > 4. The technical category of the intended presentation (Cassandra/=20 > NoSQL; Content Technologies; (Java) Enterprise Development; Felix/=20 > OSGi; Geronimo; Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing; Lucene, Mahout + =20 > friends/Search; Tomcat; or Tuscany) > > 5. The classification for each presentation (Servers, Cloud, or =20 > Innovation) =96 some presentations may have more than one theme (e.g., = =20 > a next-generation server can be classified both as "Servers" and =20 > "Innovation" > > 6. The intended audience level (beginner, intermediate, advanced) > > 7. A 75-200 word overview of your presentation > > 8. A 100-200-word speaker bio that includes prior conference =20 > speaking or related experience > > 9. Feedback or references (with contact information) on =20 > presentations given within the last three years > > To be considered, proposals must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 =20= > at midnight Pacific Time. Please email any questions regarding =20 > proposal submissions to cfp AT apachecon DOT com. > > Technical Tracks Key Dates > > 23 April 2010: Call For Participation Open > 28 May 2010: Call For Participation Closes > 11 June 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection Notification > 1-5 November 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 > We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! > > For the ApacheCon Planning team, > Sally Khudairi, Program Lead --Apple-Mail-8-775241319-- From general-return-1604-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 23:41:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10202 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 23:41:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 23:41:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 89900 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:41:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89788 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:41:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89779 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 23:41:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:41:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:41:13 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:CC: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=jBJVm4qNC/V0emYD1aNcauFiZzbqgp+Lip3nney4ILa9CcpUl3/RQrGq MJboxscDohHNOh0104bT7YeuTshKStbkws3ARYtJNKVVIRVrc6p3e3AAv Im5oClIsHMlQhCc; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1275435673; x=1306971673; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Chukwa=20as=20TLP?|Date:=20Tue ,=201=20Jun=202010=2023:40:50=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20 |CC:=20Bill=20Graham=20,=20Jiaqi=20 Tan=20,=20Jerome=0D=0A=20Boulon=20,=20Ariel=20Rabkin=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20 |References:=20; bh=PNG3rY8nUJDvy8p9N5Xq8QiMHSsrXvZbChzJRap7X0A=; b=vocRsJdHsB/RYwBAxwEsRASe5Jkkoy0OWEKb/8v98A56ggVk8WQePHec ONNFuq2rvoEfUDpwU2Rp0qzc6240A4aTXrtxOih0O+KgQv1rDokiomEyQ hjoXNjRutp/p0BY; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,343,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="12823054" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:40:52 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:40:51 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:40:51 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" CC: Bill Graham , Jiaqi Tan , Jerome Boulon , Ariel Rabkin Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? Thread-Index: AcsB0W7dgQlmbfPShEWXCOQcnrztAAATRtEA Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:40:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2010 23:40:52.0348 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF2A33C0:01CB01E3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should become a top-level > Apache project. Wow. I thought Chukwa was basically dead, much less prepared to be a TLP.= =20 From general-return-1605-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 01 23:44:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13041 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 23:44:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 23:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 97571 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:44:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97520 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 23:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97508 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 23:44:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:44:02 +0000 Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so52841gwa.35 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:43:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=reY7CW5yC+MzFHxw9UTQ33s0R+74zrDDWZSsomgG1eI=; b=o/NZesOnVcFIGwY1ENLbwYZ8tkO7/OsEo9Bug1sn03jaYxGuOZO6rTDKEQedS2Ezez 98AedNM/40+eWfawifE/OBOb9rjC/s+R+XWF02q4HXyG8Y99HQWur/vwsSJlGapT+nCU lc5Vi74P5fU9nP5DP+S7Hx3tZgEWCUgr4wzV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WsA8eU4KHZrWytaLrksKTO3rhY3vDbVm4RtTrEnrZS+fWvXtjYts80iteDKpfMHs0s 6BVdqJ5NUXLF50PkhlbeKBcQJTnuKKpWj+75wtHuu6N9jKw5fENuX24o4fEZL4c7S1Xt qLI5bJPPRDA2WYccQkksrDOpJqIIkKG++4fjs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.96.78 with SMTP id g14mr2974039qan.117.1275435821347; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.100.131 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:43:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:43:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? From: Ariel Rabkin To: Allen Wittenauer Cc: "" , Bill Graham , Jiaqi Tan , Jerome Boulon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We're certainly far from dead. It's in use at several sites; we're getting significant code contributions from outside the original developer group; we've done several releases, and we're seeing steadily more user mailing list traffic. But I agree the jump to TLP is probably ill-advised, and would vote for incubation instead. --Ari On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should become a top-level >> Apache project. > > Wow. =A0I thought Chukwa was basically dead, much less prepared to be a T= LP. > --=20 Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com UC Berkeley Computer Science Department From general-return-1606-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 02 02:17:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58949 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2010 02:17:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jun 2010 02:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27306 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 02:17:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27183 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 02:17:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27175 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2010 02:17:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:17:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kiyoshi.mizumaru@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:17:26 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so5291763gyf.35 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Xt2C43j43UStle8VdpqAsXRsz3vFCxl6CKV3w4UYyBk=; b=AOXfRlb6RoPHQdzj9ODIfXNrPxp9TEbHE5ar30g7vffvyynNjQQktgnEL6CoPjd2Lb NpT0ff/xbAlOHd64pV0HXOl2NffQlOKnIJTXFEZbAHJRMfCJjzuC2k5dXJ3AXuDAEE5b q7GIEoLvWH8KHU3Qga9YvaKtWKx8SniC2b3jM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=k/a3H8SMYgwjm4GQd9V5g0qDi/DMOSzYkoPsTzNtdHQwFe1L6Dbot0lhMEhTf5Pds8 BMQg202EpY3+16244w4T2P2sFVVWdhn3mfMAEVZuJEIAk9aLhSirK59ipgQILIKyUPbC OIWaH9L878eoQL0TgOnDMfsR2IpR0EGiCKIII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.48.9 with SMTP id v9mr7614159ybv.288.1275445025567; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.142.18 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:17:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <394531.3151.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <394531.3151.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:17:05 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "No datanode to stop " message on stop-dfs.sh From: Kiyoshi Mizumaru To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Any idea what can cause issue like this? I saw this message when I forgot to switch a user to who had started the Hadoop/HDFS instance and invoked stop-dfs.sh from different user. # sorry for my poor English. On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:19 AM, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I have a brand new setup of hadoop machine cluster with 50 machines. I see some weird issues come up with the cluster with time....Things run just fine for a few days and then when I try to run stop-dfs.sh, it says > > no namenode to stop > hadoop-07: no data node to stop > hadoop-08: no data node to stop > . > . > . > hadoop-03: no secondarynamenode to stop > > When I go to these machines, the data node is actually running. > > Any idea what can cause issue like this? The last time it happened I killed all the running datanodes manually and then started the dfs. It started fine. After that even the stop-dfs.sh worked as expected. But now it got back to the same situation again. > > One more thing I see a lot of left over running "Child" tasks from task attempts on these machines. > > Appreciate any help. > > Thanks, > C > > > From general-return-1607-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 02 04:22:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85014 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2010 04:22:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jun 2010 04:22:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 93927 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 04:22:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93800 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 04:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30877 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2010 02:22:29 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tanjiaqi@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yS2rxoSdrkFdoQC79gG9jdm1ezGQL1Bi20maLHxWZ4=; b=ZDNWdRmk6T6PLUtT4v6tr/kSxPy8HA2CvyRhJ4AYHTwwC1wgwo9EVWu91YoVVDqqqJ cNlKe/HUyYsxlEVMPYDUKNS2megg+7RLKZT8AvaDsns5GL5hX0UOxmFJ9M4eDhKaXAbN cX88aoH7pAur6q/M6kPp7rsywTTo86NYc4bl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dbMzvZc+MX6Jg9RSyZzsWgWmSWdx1YEHSZFbXxVyNITUO8ERunI84hBJaHZ9sgIvvg mUOryyR9A1ABQK4hU2aKUE/HYEnk+8dwkCxOi4lTHLfMOX5v/b1pi9/+AruJErQMm+uq tOQWLpSN3bn7kSRnr17jYh8fqGbPho203AmRw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Jiaqi Tan Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:21:44 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as TLP? To: Ariel Rabkin Cc: Allen Wittenauer , "" , Bill Graham , Jerome Boulon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would also vote for incubation. Jiaqi On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Ariel Rabkin wrote: > We're certainly far from dead. =C2=A0It's in use at several sites; we're > getting significant code contributions from outside the original > developer group; we've done several releases, and we're seeing > steadily more user mailing list traffic. > > But I agree the jump to TLP is probably ill-advised, and would vote > for incubation instead. > > --Ari > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> >> On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> >>> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should become a top-level >>> Apache project. >> >> Wow. =C2=A0I thought Chukwa was basically dead, much less prepared to be= a TLP. >> > > > > -- > Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com > UC Berkeley Computer Science Department > From general-return-1608-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 02 08:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40236 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2010 08:03:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jun 2010 08:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 53214 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 08:03:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52982 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 08:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52974 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2010 08:03:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:03:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:03:48 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:03:27 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:01:44 -0700 Subject: Re: "No datanode to stop " message on stop-dfs.sh Thread-Topic: "No datanode to stop " message on stop-dfs.sh Thread-Index: AcsCKhSXtkNq3WHHT6+qA784W0OnKQ== Message-ID: <77207064-AAA9-49EF-AA16-D926139BFCC2@richrelevance.com> References: <394531.3151.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <394531.3151.qm@web114518.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hadoop by default places its .pid files in /tmp. On most linux distros, a script will come along and delete stuff from there= that hasn't been modified in a while. The startup / shutdown scripts are = merely looking for these pid files. The solution is to move the temp files= to somewhere sane. Maybe /var/run/hadoop/. On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:19 PM, C J wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a brand new setup of hadoop machine cluster with 50 machines. I se= e some weird issues come up with the cluster with time....Things run just f= ine for a few days and then when I try to run stop-dfs.sh, it says=20 >=20 > no namenode to stop > hadoop-07: no data node to stop > hadoop-08: no data node to stop > . > . > . > hadoop-03: no secondarynamenode to stop >=20 > When I go to these machines, the data node is actually running.=20 >=20 > Any idea what can cause issue like this? The last time it happened I kill= ed all the running datanodes manually and then started the dfs. It started = fine. After that even the stop-dfs.sh worked as expected. But now it got ba= ck to the same situation again. >=20 > One more thing I see a lot of left over running "Child" tasks from task a= ttempts on these machines. >=20 > Appreciate any help. >=20 > Thanks, > C >=20 >=20 From general-return-1609-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 02 17:00:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24733 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2010 17:00:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jun 2010 17:00:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 7499 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 17:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7431 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2010 17:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7418 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2010 17:00:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:00:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.180] (HELO mail-pz0-f180.google.com) (209.85.222.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:59:57 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so3339315pzk.20 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:59:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3gydMqd2oNT6hGFxmddmWPeNUCRVXzoFhQTsOXs0zxY=; b=qwEZzvlW4tuZWOwne3qZ9DXrtm2+geghpTTWqcbeA5e2PzcZs9APSLv6YP/iEhabw4 d9fzXufiB1fAoVZnNy1T2W26d2cfGQ8AoxXYw3izXpRQdN8JHvZy4Ixzk+ojQ04e5eyW p7Hn4EmXUTqIrIAsf8vPaUcMm9lCLQlISFCfI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nND27mUuAn4iOUCy/b7W5VmhbHqGEWg9M/PDSaMhWQjJsDh8ef5L8L8upKm9D8OX/8 AAu5bchVz7FITo3xpi3RzUqKL+JtpGhcWyg6wP9wvUPBdbTvw86YnQkgnYt0j+tR6kJw FxY4toe9maTMoapNPkFFA5dsdWxrSTCvELmh0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.74.8 with SMTP id w8mr5113530wfa.274.1275497972438; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.174.19 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:59:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e90bf78fb04f04880f0335 --001636e90bf78fb04f04880f0335 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello folks, I created a branch for doing the append/sync support for Hadoop 0.20. You can fetch the branch via http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/ If you feel that there are some JIRAS that need to go into this branch, please update the fix-version of those JIRAS with the tag "0.20-append ". thanks, dhruba On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > @Allen: we are definitely behind 0.21 release. Tom White is guiding that > release and most developers are committed to removing blockers for that > release. Todd rightly mentions that the work being done for 0.20 benefits > 0.21 as well. > > @Jay: Thanks for summing it up so well. I completely agree with your > viewpoint. > > thanks > dhruba > > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > >> Given that the 0.20-append branch pretty much already exists >> unofficially, via IRC, IM and email forwarded patchsets, it seems like >> giving it an official home is just recognizing the status quo. >> Especially since 0.21 probably won't be getting rolled out into >> production everywhere the first day it's officially released. If the >> work's going on anyways, I don't see how giving people a shared home >> hurts matters, if anything it gives them a better shared touchpoint >> for forward-porting bugfixes to 0.21. >> >> A case could be made that by making it more painful to run >> 0.20-append, more momentum is created towards 0.21 but since Tom is >> already on top of 21 and seemingly doing an excellent job, and since >> the HBase community will probably be some of the first people to move >> to 0.21 anyways, I don't see why having 0.20-append will damage 0.21's >> momentum at this point. >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Michael Segel >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> From: todd@cloudera.com >> >> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 >> >> Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase >> >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> >> >> > >> >> > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract >> >> > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 >> >> > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). >> >> >> >> For what it's worth, though, the majority of the size of the 0.20 >> >> append patch is made up of additional unit tests. I have started >> >> forward-porting these new tests to the trunk append and it's already >> >> exposed a number of bugs. So while it's tempting to say that the 0.20 >> >> append is "wasted effort", it really is benefiting the entire >> >> community and the 0.21 release as well. >> >> >> >> -Todd >> >> >> > >> > Sometimes you have to slow down to go faster. >> > >> > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________ >> > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from >> your inbox. >> > >> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --001636e90bf78fb04f04880f0335-- From general-return-1610-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 03 05:45:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97681 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2010 05:45:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2010 05:45:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 95694 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 05:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95506 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 05:45:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95492 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2010 05:45:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:45:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:45:29 +0000 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so3822223vws.35 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:45:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.79.133 with SMTP id p5mr4323156qak.220.1275543907918; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.94.203 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:45:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:45:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f97250086e2fa048819b520 --00c09f97250086e2fa048819b520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure, each project can choose to use the framework in the way they see fit on Launchpad. I wanted to call out their use of metadata as being particularly nice. We may want to consider similar fields and applications of those fields for HEPs. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > Blueprints (it's a launchpad thing) is more of an issue tracking > system (launchpad doesn't put features/enhancements in their bug > database), eg drizzle has lots of blueprints, and blueprints for > cleaning up code, adding config flags, etc. We'll use jira for that > kind of stuff, the HEP is for larger stuff that needs more upfront > discussion. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher > wrote: > > A far more lightweight example of multi-issue feature planning in an open > > source project comes from Drizzle and their "blueprints": > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/drizzle. > > > > Each "spec" has a drafter, an approver, and an assignee; declares the > other > > specs on which it depends; points to the relevant branches in the source > > tree and issues in the issue tracker; and has a priority, definition > state, > > and implementation state. > > > > I don't know how it's working out for them in practice, but on paper it > > looks quite nice. > > > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > >> > No, but I'd estimate the cost of merging at 1-2 days work a week just > to > >> > pull in the code *and identify why the tests are failing*. Git may be > >> better > >> > at merging in changes, but if Hadoop doesn't work on my machine after > the > >> > merge, I need to identify whether its my code, the merged code, some > >> machine > >> > quirk, etc. It's the testing that is the problem for me, not the > >> > merge effort. That's the Hadoop own tests any my own functional test > >> suites, > >> > the ones that bring up clusters and push work through. Those are the > >> > troublespots, as they do things that hadoop's own tests don't do, like > as > >> > for all the JSP pages. > >> > >> I've lived off a git branch of common/hdfs for half a year with a big > >> uncommitted patch, it's no where near 1-2 days of effort per week to > >> merge in changes from trunk. If the tests are passing on trunk, and > >> they fail after your merge then those are real test failures due to > >> your change (and therefore should require effort). The issues with > >> your internal tests failing due to changes on trunk is the same > >> whether you merge or you just do an update - you have to update before > >> checking in the patch anyway - so that issue is about the state of > >> trunk when you merge or update, rather than about being on a branch. > >> > >> > > >> >> Might find the > >> >> following interesting: > >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html > >> > > >> > There's a long story behind JDD's paper, I'm glad you have read it, it > >> does > >> > lay out what is effectively the ASF process for effecting significant > >> change > >> > -but it doesn't imply that's the only process for having changes. > >> > > >> > >> Just to be clear I don't mean imply that branches are the only process > >> for making changes. Interesting that this is considered the effective > >> ASF process, it hasn't seemed to me that recent big features on hadoop > >> have used it, only one I'm aware of that was done on a branch was > >> append. > >> > >> > I think gradual evolution in trunk is good, it lets people play with > >> what's > >> > coming in. Having lots of separate branches and everyone's private > >> release > >> > being a merge of many patches that you choose is bad. > >> > >> Agreed. Personally I don't think people should release from branches. > >> And in practice I don't think you'll see lots of branches, people can > >> and would still develop on trunk. Getting changes merged from a branch > >> back to trunk before the whole branch is merged is a good thing, the > >> whole branch may never be merged and that's OK too. Branches are a > >> mechanism, releases are policy. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Eli > >> > > > --00c09f97250086e2fa048819b520-- From general-return-1611-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 03 15:53:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96061 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2010 15:53:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2010 15:53:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 86741 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 15:53:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86656 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 15:53:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86648 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2010 15:53:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:53:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:53:13 +0000 Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so204941pwj.35 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/YxnAKp1z6jsOm5B4HMd+CQydzryCb2AmA5iE4Pxcfk=; b=wy9VVCqVHEvHbX28kNgkWWeamFyB+qoTMiTEh0iKO0UkqzwR0PhoINt/ECefwWPzGc IIOIA50LPN9cNOPIs/446ABlc/ipfidtUjvqYL8Vfwd4+m9SSTTD07XEWZ+7ba2q6HSt BCoCFI0mkcCJR9GGVQIBLFQ3J7TlIKIay4D3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=J6+DfTCnwPUgz5//t6UClR3aqnuXo1uFYY444pNQItNojCHJ1z8ooL6x7LCkJ1O3ux Aq2GwO7flDaHbu8Eo0a/6ehQTe1M0oz0Gz839MAInQThJRVe6cgpmMKpbMx0Z15Bzslv Ye3m6out6I/xUc0wd+p+601LRxuKMS/3ZvZNQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.8.13 with SMTP id 13mr6730754wfh.210.1275580371881; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.128.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:52:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: how I can do to configure/start a hadoop cluster(pseudo distributed) with the last hadoop trunk code(I have generated .jar file for common, hdfs and mapred) From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c09cf2d12d04882232a5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502c09cf2d12d04882232a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All, I have followed the instructions on http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment to download the latest trunk source code and build .jar for common, hdfs and mapred. but how should I proceed to configure and start a hadoop cluster(psudo distributed) with these latest .jar? I knew how to configured/start the hadoop cluster with formal hadoop package(hadoop-*.tar.gz with all stuff of common, hdfs and mapred there). I googled but didn't find the related information, most information I got after compile is to run unit test. Can anyone help? Thanks for the help. Best Regards, Fred --00504502c09cf2d12d04882232a5-- From general-return-1612-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 03 23:04:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47749 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2010 23:04:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2010 23:04:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 93451 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 23:04:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93394 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2010 23:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93383 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2010 23:04:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:04:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:04:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (wlanvpn-snve-246-61.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.61]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o53N3wfO033984 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-organization:user-agent; b=FSqfiqytk6SxLAQnZ04E/U7gXP2C0o2kCr54F84dUWYau+DP8zT/Ej+ceXLoi/gP Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:03:58 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Last call: ApacheCon TechTalks CFP closes today Message-ID: <20100603230358.GC47625@wlanvpn-snve-246-61.corp.yahoo.com> References: <9DD2220F-023D-4E6B-88C5-F08B184B6102@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dkEUBIird37B8yKS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: Yahoo! Hadoop (Grid computing) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Owen Do you think it'd be a good idea to submit Herriot (large scale testing framework we were working on for some time; see HADOOP-6332 for more info) = to this conference? Please advise, thanks. Cos On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:33PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We've decided to extend the deadline a week to this Friday. As a =20 > reminder, all speakers get two nights at the conference hotel and free = =20 > registration at ApacheCon. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 > On May 28, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > > All, > > As a reminder the CFP for proposals closes today. The CFP is at htt= p://blogs.apache.org/conferences/date/20100428 > > > > -- Owen > > > > ApacheCon North America 2010 > > 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta > > > > Technical Tracks: Call For Participation > > All submissions must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 at midnight =20 > > Pacific Time. > > The official conference, trainings, and expo of The Apache Software =20 > > Foundation (ASF) returns to Atlanta this November, with dozens of =20 > > technical, business, and community-focused sessions at the beginner, = =20 > > intermediate, and advanced levels. > > > > Over the past decade, the ASF has gone from strength to strength, =20 > > developing and shepherding nearly 150 Top-Level Projects and new =20 > > initiatives in the Apache Incubator and Labs. This year's ApacheCon =20 > > celebrates how Apache technologies have sparked creativity, =20 > > challenged processes, streamlined development, improved =20 > > collaboration, launched businesses, bolstered economies, and =20 > > improved lives. > > > > We are proud of our achievements and recognize that the global =20 > > Apache community --both developers and users-- are responsible for =20 > > the success and popularity of our products. > > > > The ApacheCon Planning Team are soliciting 50-minute technical =20 > > presentations for the next conference, which will focus on the theme = =20 > > ?Servers, the Cloud, and Innovation?. > > > > We are particularly interested in highly-relevant, professionally-=20 > > directed presentations that demonstrate specific probrlems and real-=20 > > world solutions. Part of the technical program has already been =20 > > planned; we welcome proposals based on the following Apache Projects = =20 > > and related technical areas: > > > > - Cassandra/NoSQL > > - Content Technologies > > - (Java) Enterprise Development > > - Felix/OSGi > > - Geronimo > > - Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing > > - Lucene, Mahout + friends/Search > > - Tomcat > > - Tuscany > > Submissions are open to anyone with relevant expertise: ASF =20 > > affiliation is not required to present at, attend, or otherwise =20 > > participate in ApacheCon. > > > > Please keep in mind that whilst we encourage submissions that the =20 > > highlight the use of specific Apache solutions, we are unable to =20 > > accept marketing/commercially-oriented presentations. > > > > Other proposals, such as panels, or those longer than 50 minutes in =20 > > duration have been considered in the past. You are welcome to submit = =20 > > an alternate presentation, however, such sessions are accepted under = =20 > > exceptional circumstances. Please be as descriptive as possible, =20 > > including names/bios of proposed panelists and any related details. > > > > All accepted speakers (not co-presenters) qualify for general =20 > > conference admission and a minimum of two nights lodging at the =20 > > conference hotel. Additional hotel nights and travel assistance are =20 > > possible, depending on the number of presentations given and type of = =20 > > assistance needed. > > > > To submit a presentation proposal, please send an email to =20 > > submissions AT apachecon DOT com containing the following =20 > > information in plaintext (no attachments, please): > > > > 1. Your full name, title, and organization > > > > 2. Contact information, including your address > > > > 3. The name of your proposed session (keep your title simple and =20 > > relevant to the topic) > > > > 4. The technical category of the intended presentation (Cassandra/=20 > > NoSQL; Content Technologies; (Java) Enterprise Development; Felix/=20 > > OSGi; Geronimo; Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing; Lucene, Mahout + =20 > > friends/Search; Tomcat; or Tuscany) > > > > 5. The classification for each presentation (Servers, Cloud, or =20 > > Innovation) ? some presentations may have more than one theme (e.g., = =20 > > a next-generation server can be classified both as "Servers" and =20 > > "Innovation" > > > > 6. The intended audience level (beginner, intermediate, advanced) > > > > 7. A 75-200 word overview of your presentation > > > > 8. A 100-200-word speaker bio that includes prior conference =20 > > speaking or related experience > > > > 9. Feedback or references (with contact information) on =20 > > presentations given within the last three years > > > > To be considered, proposals must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 =20 > > at midnight Pacific Time. Please email any questions regarding =20 > > proposal submissions to cfp AT apachecon DOT com. > > > > Technical Tracks Key Dates > > > > 23 April 2010: Call For Participation Open > > 28 May 2010: Call For Participation Closes > > 11 June 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection Notification > > 1-5 November 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 > > We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! > > > > For the ApacheCon Planning team, > > Sally Khudairi, Program Lead >=20 --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iF4EAREIAAYFAkwINN4ACgkQMqXifkwDoaF5WwD/azv9wuKPEL+vdydP9NiUI9/d RCrtdLv6FaIt6A93ivQA/i+Cre5xI/6Z2Rzy2VarEH1H4N9GNtldJbM3wZMZBFzr =2tqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dkEUBIird37B8yKS-- From general-return-1613-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 04 19:40:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 218 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2010 19:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Jun 2010 19:40:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 92409 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2010 19:40:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92361 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2010 19:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92349 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2010 19:40:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:40:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 74.125.82.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:40:47 +0000 Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so1625209wyb.35 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.194 with SMTP id u44mr10878wee.10.1275680422351; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.152.165 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:40:22 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Problematic disk in a datanode From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e7446d03020488397e67 --0016e6d7e7446d03020488397e67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, A while ago We've added a new disk (volume) to every datanode in our cluster. We have configured the disks in "data.dfs.dir" in hdfs-site both on the job tracker and on each machine. This went successfully for all of the machines except one, where the new disk was not recognized by hadoop. We can not find out what's wrong with it. We know that the new disk is not recognized because "http://namenode:50070/" shows smaller capacity to that machine. The mapred + hdfs directories on that drive exist, but they are not identical to the structure of directories in other disks: In the problematic drive there is no "local" directory under "mapred", and no "name", "namesecondary" directories under "hdfs". This problem was not so terrible until now, when the rest of the disks are full: The logs started containing errors such as "No space left on device" and "DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid local directory for taskTracker/jobcache/". Some Hadoop jobs fail with the same errors, and the datanode+tasktracker on that machine crash a lot. How do we install this disk properly? Thanks in advance. Technical info: hadoop-0.20, centos, each machine is datanode and tasktracker (another machine is jobtracker + namenode). -- Oded --0016e6d7e7446d03020488397e67-- From general-return-1614-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 05:34:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2559 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 05:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 05:34:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31567 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 05:34:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31479 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 05:34:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31469 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 05:34:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:34:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.180] (HELO mail-pz0-f180.google.com) (209.85.222.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:34:26 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so2253796pzk.20 for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vcWyk8KF0ASy1PqFw+Tx+6369eUSD3A5AeukGW4s5cM=; b=v8cSbSFN2SW0kN9JqoyHQ3M5TbqAMC4QPlEYAWg3GHNgmTb+yOcvWyDjSwejM5oams FneEbHeGJWryUa+2xjDaJDC6IrpAA7SoMg2lekSnetFnruhCT9K0jgLGkfNO9X2KnZ/M x/8VIhKWNbmaSUozIVUZnqkHdHIJlr2Kfl8jc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lmqgx9EgMEkxWMt9Jv/ZUrNglzvP93kdpurZ0dO/npK6kPIeqe4VT3Ge2tljzt4sR5 uX3q2s48hZSy6la9CiYIpSEGBtu00KjZ8FtGQzQ1ryKL9s/MF6qqRv9xexjR02+bu1NP y7HYmrrqViYGMGnXts6F2mR4CHouJiXz26M9o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.74.6 with SMTP id w6mr10534816wfa.249.1275888846033; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.215.20 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:34:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: How to force the replication ? From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all I change the replication of file by using command : bin/hadoop setrep But when I use fsck to check the status of the file, it always shows that the one replica of this file is missing. I know that setrep command only change the metadata of NameNode, so when will it affect the data node eventually ? And Can I force the procedure ? -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang From general-return-1615-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 07:37:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33002 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 07:37:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 07:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 22921 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 07:37:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22739 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 07:37:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22731 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 07:37:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:37:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1493.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:37:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 32893 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 07:36:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:36:45 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so934558iwn.35 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:36:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.210.19 with SMTP id gi19mr4085552ibb.140.1275896202181; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.148.65 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:36:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: New Common/MapReduce committer: Amareshwari Sriramadasu From: Chris Douglas To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Hadoop PMC has voted to make Amareshwari Sriramadasu a committer on the Common and MapReduce subprojects. Congratulations Amareshwari! Thanks for all your past and continued work on Hadoop. -C From general-return-1616-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 11:39:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96910 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 11:39:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 11:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 41247 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 11:39:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40336 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 11:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39975 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 11:39:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:39:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vidur@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:39:10 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1276515527.41327@n3j4OK4DHUmyeL6vUc2lFg Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o57BckSU032261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:08:46 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id o57BckCI032250; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:08:46 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to vidur@localhost using -f Received: from 125.16.17.152 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user vidur) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:08:46 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:08:46 +0530 (IST) Subject: HDFS Source Code From: "Vidur Goyal" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o57BckSU032261 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: vidur@students.iiit.ac.in X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5, No Hi, I am experimenting with HDFS API's . I was wondering if somebody could help me understand the source code of hdfs by providing any relevant documentation or could guide me how to start. Thanks, Vidur -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-1617-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 14:21:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53100 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 14:21:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 14:21:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 40280 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 14:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40195 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 14:21:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40187 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 14:21:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:21:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:21:02 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so308968wyb.35 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.138 with SMTP id c10mr3357246wbw.219.1275920441273; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.188.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:20:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> References: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:20:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS Source Code From: Josh Patterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641842da9ee76048871605a --00163641842da9ee76048871605a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Vidur, Probably a great place to get started would be: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs_design.html Then after reading that, you could take a look at the api docs: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/ and then a few ways to touch hdfs from other languages: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HDFS-APIs Beyond that, I'd download the source from SVN and take a look at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.java to get a feel for how most apps talk to HDFS. After that you could look at: * * *org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell* to get a feel for how the shell system as a java program talks to DFSClient. Beyond that, just reading more source code and compiling your own experiments reading and writing to HDFS is the best way to get a feel for whats going on under the hood. Josh Patterson Solutions Architect Cloudera On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Vidur Goyal wrote: > Hi, > > I am experimenting with HDFS API's . I was wondering if somebody could > help me understand the source code of hdfs by providing any relevant > documentation or could guide me how to start. > > Thanks, > Vidur > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > --00163641842da9ee76048871605a-- From general-return-1618-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 16:21:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4777 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 16:21:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 16:21:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7239 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 16:21:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7185 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 16:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7177 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 16:21:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:21:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ashahzad4@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:21:15 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so470707wyb.35 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:20:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tjp85BuTr2+6Qmhybq/tWObIMBiamYIuiSFFOiCK5i4=; b=Np4iHgOx4eR0PUIPUqbmASMYnie9hQFxMaqzBQSPQuxcm6cAFuxDitTV7wv+u2H0Cx UOBYLEmIBdAHNI2T7rKBRCQAAUN7vqroW7Osc7i4CPHtMNz2J/LHwp7h3aRxWJYCL6iS 9cvrnCEZPI1iygz4a5bRV0/REjFK+pKGvIoP4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BfAWrVzk+muHimJ/wnRmwawHaHXtktyIhw0qS1oszey1oBs2LCsy3nz4jjMj6eqY0s EDz/0T0Jl/pvMBt4/Ej7xmmBuSl3wFJprN7tkuec2rP5qmn8v6kTN5GBIgIOM5dkQzQc ETUcuLqNMb5O/eKT+JVl+DqPcY/jLsg3FmslE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.138 with SMTP id e10mr2558641wef.51.1275927652998; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.19 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:20:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:20:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS Source Code From: Ahmad Shahzad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99bed8423880488730e99 --0016e6d99bed8423880488730e99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am also interested in looking what is going on under the hood. Thanks for sharing this information. Could you please tell the same about Map Reduce. I mean, how to figure out that how job tracker and task trackers communicate with each other. Which classes in hadoop api are responsible for doing that. If i go in detail, i would like to know that how can i change the communication mechanism of hadoop map reduce to use my communication library instead of using regular sockets and http. Regards, Ahmad Shahzad --0016e6d99bed8423880488730e99-- From general-return-1619-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 19:47:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97853 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 19:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 19:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31449 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 19:47:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31400 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 19:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31392 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 19:47:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:47:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:47:46 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so715433wyb.35 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:47:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.147 with SMTP id h19mr2667063wem.81.1275940045540; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.188.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:47:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:47:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS Source Code From: Josh Patterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367faf132b5976048875f1e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367faf132b5976048875f1e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ahmad, A nice overview of Map Reduce is at: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html In terms of replacing the entire communication framework under Map Reduce, thats a considerably different and more complex task that simply talking to hdfs from java. You have a large number of interlocking classes based on the communication system of hadoop; replacing this would be like trying to replace the frame of an automobile --- in other words, you might try, but you run a high risk of not having a large percentage of the parts not work correctly with the new automobile frame. If you were to tackle such a large task, it would be less of "knowing a certain set of classes to work with" and more of knowing how a large degree of hadoop works. Josh On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Ahmad Shahzad wrote: > Hi, > I am also interested in looking what is going on under the hood. Thanks > for sharing this information. > > Could you please tell the same about Map Reduce. I mean, how to figure out > that how job tracker and task trackers communicate with each other. Which > classes in hadoop api are responsible for doing that. If i go in detail, i > would like to know that how can i change the communication mechanism of > hadoop map reduce to use my communication library instead of using regular > sockets and http. > > Regards, > Ahmad Shahzad > --0016367faf132b5976048875f1e1-- From general-return-1620-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 07 19:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98444 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 19:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 19:50:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 33946 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 19:50:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33777 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 19:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33769 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 19:50:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.228] (HELO qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:49:53 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id T7Yh1e0051swQuc5F7pZSr; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:49:33 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id T7pP1e00p2SbwD53b7pSvf; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:49:31 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HDFS Source Code Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:49:22 -0700 References: <55997.125.16.17.152.1275910726.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please move this discussion over to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org. Thanks, Owen From general-return-1621-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 05:28:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63976 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 05:28:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 05:28:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 59891 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 05:28:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59844 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 05:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59836 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 05:28:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:28:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of maheswaran@ikyaglobal.com does not designate 121.243.47.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.243.47.5] (HELO ikyaglobal.com) (121.243.47.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:27:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 26017 invoked by uid 109); 8 Jun 2010 05:26:55 -0000 Received: from 122.165.35.199 by mail (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (perlscan: 1.25st. dmf: ???. Clear:RC:1(122.165.35.199):. Processed in 0.288082 secs); 08 Jun 2010 05:26:55 -0000 Received: from abts-tn-static-199.35.165.122.airtelbroadband.in (HELO CHNDSK029) (Maheswaran@[122.165.35.199]) (envelope-sender ) by ikyaglobal.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jun 2010 05:26:55 -0000 From: "Maheswaran" To: Subject: Regarding Oppurtunity in Hadoop - Bangalore,INDIA Location Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:57:42 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0058_01CB06F9.6C023B20" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcsGyoS6U3a1Orc6QNu1nuZJzjd/xwAAMZ4Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CB06F9.6C023B20 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0059_01CB06F9.6C023B20" ------=_NextPart_001_0059_01CB06F9.6C023B20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Developers/Architect, This is Maheswaran from IKYA, Chennai. We have a Hadoop Architect positions open in Bangalore for one of our client. Kindly let us know if any one is interested. Will share more details about the position and the company. Thanks & Regards, Maheswaran A | Practice Lead-IT | Recruitment Solutions Ikya Human Capital Solutions Pvt. Ltd. No. 2, 5th Floor, Alsa Towers 186/187 Poonamalee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600010, India Direct: +91 44 6662 3008 | Mobile: +91 9840 348 330 | www.ikyaglobal.com ------=_NextPart_001_0059_01CB06F9.6C023B20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_001_0059_01CB06F9.6C023B20-- ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CB06F9.6C023B20-- From general-return-1622-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 11:30:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74515 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 11:30:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 11:30:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 13138 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 11:30:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12659 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 11:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12648 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 11:30:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:30:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ashahzad4@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:30:26 +0000 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so975458wwb.35 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:30:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bl9HunTbfiiaoIiaf6opqsynmvLLhS3RTqmlxHAZXk0=; b=JK0Ch4bUpgq3QcGK9jn79CnP6Y1EfNaNQs3gbQc+X+dso0h6rfROvEYbPzeHDc1n6Q BF4xl6FVn6hJcJbt81N3nzxmBU+erq84zAq46cgGZQtvR8hM5FWbprXwngWpjJFzsMDT k7LyU2XgrBKZYENVmeCUB1d9+WRsdfVz6u0G4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Muf/rih68KBl6JQZ0th/2Aw21RK7LPtAcak9+S1OhD93+r37oDll3Y+95aVoAQe2t8 o8BjYDB4Bwu0afx5vnvIK8XGtTCppcddY/w8q0Q4YccD4pZvXrVTsZDljbY0mCTIKWia ar42oMesOtWbxbwPjLJyD3JGIRSPlVjlHK1Y4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.137.1 with SMTP id u1mr7445493wbt.68.1275996604926; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.19 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:30:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Is it possible ....!!! From: Ahmad Shahzad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b55305f10630488831cab --0016e65b55305f10630488831cab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I wanted to ask if it is possible to intercept every communication that takes place between hadoop's map reduce task i.e between JobTracker and TaskTracker and make it pass through my own communication library. So, if JobTracker and TaskTracker talk through http or rpc, i would like to intercept the call and let it pass through my communication library. If it is possible can anyone tell me that which set of classes i need to look at hadoop's distribution. Similarly, for the hdfs, is it possible to let all the communication that is happening between namenode and datanode to pass through my communication library. Regards, Ahmad Shahzad --0016e65b55305f10630488831cab-- From general-return-1623-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 13:49:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18704 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 13:49:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 13:49:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 72265 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 13:49:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72200 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 13:49:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72192 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 13:49:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:49:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:49:00 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o58DTPJf029598 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:29:25 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7842A48B688D for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:48:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id 4hKFmfk37k8W2ciQ for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:48:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o58DmdgU008394 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:48:39 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%13]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:48:38 -0500 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:48:37 -0500 Subject: RE: Is it possible ....!!! Thread-Topic: Is it possible ....!!! Thread-Index: AcsG/hKLo973s1AeSay/G7JOILdSvgAEyjew Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it possible? Sure. But why? What's your use case? -----Original Message----- From: Ahmad Shahzad [mailto:ashahzad4@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:30 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Is it possible ....!!! Hi, I wanted to ask if it is possible to intercept every communication th= at takes place between hadoop's map reduce task i.e between JobTracker and TaskTracker and make it pass through my own communication library. So, if JobTracker and TaskTracker talk through http or rpc, i would like = to intercept the call and let it pass through my communication library. If i= t is possible can anyone tell me that which set of classes i need to look a= t hadoop's distribution. Similarly, for the hdfs, is it possible to let all the communication that= is happening between namenode and datanode to pass through my communication library. Regards, Ahmad Shahzad The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-1624-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 14:25:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32443 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 14:25:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 14:25:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 17033 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 14:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16963 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 14:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16955 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 14:25:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ashahzad4@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:25:02 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so1614168wyb.35 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w87NX+WX/hfrrosXE36ZFplFpLGzSWQZvUjKSk/mnRw=; b=iOEBQmWrXt1ipWf6np0LxbSj+gvLacll/kYJLoCdgoajFHUGzu6LuEnK/qFGhsou7I 4OgdFwGF7HA1gYPzYqgBaFMoAZCB0GPs7SbvK2y5B53aGdSlGOYLIjuAcPl1WxlXGA53 Gr75qnV3zSMgpqFyFU+T201fMcQBMbe0HN0cE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yk2c2iRPMSV1maAZl6fk4HCtOHyJxg9VWmU2JuRzzcHZi1ZU6Y2NmrNWTkMS5KT5j/ pYcVeBz0w6kbPKKU7qHsgb9H5vnscEy/JmTnLLsIXzQCTeqsWiwIrbARTbLja7wZrakR rzD9qBSO1g2KgAgpommaSeGEy2nQTcZJPz9Eg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.199 with SMTP id e49mr3560983wef.38.1276007080996; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.19 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:24:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:24:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it possible ....!!! From: Ahmad Shahzad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a0facb312e0488858c26 --0016e6d9a0facb312e0488858c26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Reason for doing that is that i want all the communication to happen through a communication library that resolves every communication problem that we can have e.g firewalls, NAT, non routed paths, multi homing etc etc. By using that library all the headache of communication will be gone. So, we will be able to use hadoop quite easily and there will be no communication problems. Thats my master's project. So, i want to know how to start and where to look for. Regards, Ahmad Shahzad On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Is it possible? > Sure. > > But why? What's your use case? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ahmad Shahzad [mailto:ashahzad4@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:30 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Is it possible ....!!! > > Hi, > I wanted to ask if it is possible to intercept every communication that > takes place between hadoop's map reduce task i.e between JobTracker and > TaskTracker and make it pass through my own communication library. > So, if JobTracker and TaskTracker talk through http or rpc, i would like to > intercept the call and let it pass through my communication library. If it > is possible can anyone tell me that which set of classes i need to look at > hadoop's distribution. > > Similarly, for the hdfs, is it possible to let all the communication that > is > happening between namenode and datanode to pass through my communication > library. > > Regards, > Ahmad Shahzad > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > --0016e6d9a0facb312e0488858c26-- From general-return-1625-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 16:49:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91262 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 16:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 16:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 33531 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 16:49:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33464 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 16:49:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33456 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 16:49:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:49:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.96] (HELO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:49:24 +0000 Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TSai1e0041vN32cA9Up2Q3; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:49:02 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TUot1e00R2SbwD58iUowtt; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:49:00 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Is it possible ....!!! Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:13:18 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Ahmad Shahzad wrote: > Hi, > I wanted to ask if it is possible to intercept every > communication that > takes place between hadoop's map reduce task i.e between JobTracker > and > TaskTracker and make it pass through my own communication library. It is possible to set up socket proxies for setting up rpc connections. Please take this thread over to common-user@hadoop.apache.org . -- Owen From general-return-1626-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 18:54:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54071 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 18:54:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 18:54:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 32164 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 18:54:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31676 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 18:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31658 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 18:54:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:54:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of n.atreju@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:54:28 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so1956345wyb.35 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XCqsVLbsmkGKIFejVv85bnR61R04W2QwbPgMKTfNb0o=; b=KhgljOFjvB7mLMubBMs2eQuQ2K+FFK1VMwvEALWTq8W/ZoZt7Yxr4LesNl/fTO4uM5 1qj//xUwtkeY7hg7tK1remjuYb6/Wyge5npzwoegkjOUrblDbF71asMBe8Btl5wFaeFb HMVoIemDSe0sHRzd+CS+wjrcCaRkhMM28gg5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Po4vbqguTeShaFssL5deuezSfuT/sUGqgReUIk5k2lcH5VfGh89z1JfPrM2Lsr7Mjy CB02iY9McaIFvjagiwmaSSiHAo6+M8UTzto+MSzYCbDHp4MyyFLEeVfKzeCbl073y5JU UwKdK3aTZyVM/qgr4jkITKGrKPUqo/FkejNpE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.19 with SMTP id v19mr3785250wee.89.1276023241572; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:54:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop From: atreju To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99bfe0a89d404888950bd --0016e6d99bfe0a89d404888950bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To generate smart output from base data we need to copy some base tables from relational database into Hadoop. Some of them are big. To dump the entire table into Hadoop everyday is not an option since there are like 30+ tables and each would take several hours. The methodology that we approached is to get the entire table dump first. Then each day or every 4-6 hours get only insert/update/delete since the last copy from RDBMS (based on a date field in the table). Using Hive do outer join + union the new data with existing data and write into a new file. For example, if there are a 100 rows in Hadoop, and in RDBMS 3 records inserted, 2 records updated and 1 deleted since the last Hadoop copy, then the Hive query will get 97 of the not changed data + 3 inserts + 2 updates and write into a new file. The other applications like Pig or Hive will pick the most recent file to use when selecting/loading data from those base table data files. This logic is working fine in lower environments for small size tables. With production data, for about 30GB size table, the incremental re-generation of the file in Hadoop is still taking several hours. I tried using zipped version and it took even longer time. I am not convinced that this is the best we can do to handle updates and deletes since we had to re-write 29GB unchanged data of the 30GB file again into a new file. ...and this is not the biggest table. I am thinking that this should be problem for many companies. What are the other approaches to apply updates and deletes on base tables to the Hadoop data files? We have 4 data nodes and using version 20.3. Thanks! --0016e6d99bfe0a89d404888950bd-- From general-return-1627-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 08 22:59:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43717 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2010 22:59:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jun 2010 22:59:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 80988 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 22:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80902 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2010 22:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80886 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2010 22:59:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:59:32 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so5568315gyf.35 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.224.66 with SMTP id in2mr3681898qcb.232.1276037950495; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:59:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.50.24 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:58:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:58:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b80dec25d8c04888cbc58 --0016363b80dec25d8c04888cbc58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think that this might be the way to go. In general, folding updates and deletes into datasets is a difficult problem due to the append-only nature of datasets. Something that might help you here is to partition your tables in Hive based on some well-distributed key. Then if you have a relatively small number of partitions affected by an incremental import (perhaps more recently-imported records are more likely to be updated? in this case, partition the tables by the month/week you imported them?) you can only perform the fold-in of the new deltas on the affected partitions. This should be much faster than a full table scan. Have you seen the Sqoop tool? It handles imports and exports between HDFS (and Hive) and RDBMS systems -- but currently can only import new records (and subsequent INSERTs); it can't handle updates/deletes. Sqoop is available at http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop -- it doesn't run on Apache 0.20.3, but works on CDH (Cloudera's Distribution for Hadoop) and Hadoop 0.21/trunk. This sort of capability is something I'm really interested in adding to Sqoop. If you've got a well-run process for doing this, I'd really appreciate your help adding this feature :) Send me an email off-list if you're interested. At the very least, I'd urge you to try out the tool. Cheers, - Aaron Kimball On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:54 PM, atreju wrote: > To generate smart output from base data we need to copy some base tables > from relational database into Hadoop. Some of them are big. To dump the > entire table into Hadoop everyday is not an option since there are like 30+ > tables and each would take several hours. > > The methodology that we approached is to get the entire table dump first. > Then each day or every 4-6 hours get only insert/update/delete since the > last copy from RDBMS (based on a date field in the table). Using Hive do > outer join + union the new data with existing data and write into a new > file. For example, if there are a 100 rows in Hadoop, and in RDBMS 3 records > inserted, 2 records updated and 1 deleted since the last Hadoop copy, then > the Hive query will get 97 of the not changed data + 3 inserts + 2 updates > and write into a new file. The other applications like Pig or Hive will pick > the most recent file to use when selecting/loading data from those base > table data files. > > This logic is working fine in lower environments for small size tables. > With production data, for about 30GB size table, the incremental > re-generation of the file in Hadoop is still taking several hours. I tried > using zipped version and it took even longer time. I am not convinced that > this is the best we can do to handle updates and deletes since we had to > re-write 29GB unchanged data of the 30GB file again into a new file. ...and > this is not the biggest table. > > I am thinking that this should be problem for many companies. What are the > other approaches to apply updates and deletes on base tables to the > Hadoop data files? > > We have 4 data nodes and using version 20.3. > > Thanks! > > --0016363b80dec25d8c04888cbc58-- From general-return-1628-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 09 10:41:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36092 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2010 10:41:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jun 2010 10:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 72887 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 10:41:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72520 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 10:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72512 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2010 10:41:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:41:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:41:17 +0000 Received: from pflip (pflip.crs4.it [156.148.70.62]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A4236BB9F for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:40:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pflip (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:40:55 +0200 Subject: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop Italy User Group From: Gianluigi Zanetti Reply-To: gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: CRS4 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:40:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1276080055.7601.41.camel@pflip> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here at CSR4 we are actively using Hadoop for multiple purposes, ranging from bioinformatics applications connected to the analysis of deep sequencing datasets and large scale Genome-Wide Association Studies to exotic applications such as using hdfs as a scalable file system to support the deployment and management of (large) HPC virtual clusters.=20 We would like to establish contacts with other group in Italy to be able to share experiences and ideas. A reasonable mechanism for this could be an Italian User group. Please e-mail me if you like the idea, so that we can assess whether there is enough interest in setting this up. Gianluigi Zanetti (gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it) From general-return-1629-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 09 16:06:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53956 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2010 16:06:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jun 2010 16:06:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 92156 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 16:06:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92075 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 16:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92067 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2010 16:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.141 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.141] (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:06:01 +0000 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o59FxibU010988 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:59:44 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o59G5cDU074364 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:05:39 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o59G5Xtb027863 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:05:33 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o59G5XND027802 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:05:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1276080055.7601.41.camel@pflip> References: <1276080055.7601.41.camel@pflip> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop Italy User Group X-KeepSent: 63D07D95:A1B5BC99-8625773D:005820BA; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:05:31 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 06/09/2010 10:05:32, Serialize complete at 06/09/2010 10:05:32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0058661B8625773D_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0058661B8625773D_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Gianluigi I'm glad to hear you are starting a new user group. Welcome to the fold. If you have any questions about running a group feel free to shoot me a note. Dekel Tankel who runs the Bay Area Group helped me out with my questions when we started ours. He's a great resource. Steve Watt - Austin Hadoop User Group Coordinator From: Gianluigi Zanetti To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: 06/09/2010 05:41 AM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop Italy User Group Here at CSR4 we are actively using Hadoop for multiple purposes, ranging from bioinformatics applications connected to the analysis of deep sequencing datasets and large scale Genome-Wide Association Studies to exotic applications such as using hdfs as a scalable file system to support the deployment and management of (large) HPC virtual clusters. We would like to establish contacts with other group in Italy to be able to share experiences and ideas. A reasonable mechanism for this could be an Italian User group. Please e-mail me if you like the idea, so that we can assess whether there is enough interest in setting this up. Gianluigi Zanetti (gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it) --=_alternative 0058661B8625773D_=-- From general-return-1630-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 09 22:33:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11989 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2010 22:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jun 2010 22:33:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 37764 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 22:33:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37452 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 22:33:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37224 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2010 22:33:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:33:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of n.atreju@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:32:59 +0000 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so1664263wwe.35 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:32:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Uht1AzCRNKuI8WwYXrUhG7oB6WRasK0Fb/jnmwkeSMM=; b=wsww5s+feyMi7uwAp2Yn/KaDgBwgTWJtDgNS8yl0F0rIYQLOJaK8TmHkNlatW0T/Qc fiOg1HWQeB2UBtQp0okCy5A8dl0x8huOLwLY40SZw28hjhLHvaY6WSnAIys90Xc8qcqw dp8SYPbqRhDd0bDstfAu0E+Omx7xbRsGqHTO0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=c0y9UPhs/x1lDW/9K9B8uErCZEAybtA/Xba0At8KvtJ9tklfZXZaiEwE8Iha0me6JR ylnjfC4iFkytwrtkvQQD2u5Cw2wmQOUoJpKQO2eqUL3lhsgeugNq4NHDvKrX+lrfgjKj gHi7GXabMIDFpFnxJuDqbggDrmx7q/DkqQQQY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.193 with SMTP id m1mr3377685wbv.23.1276122758639; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:32:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:32:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop From: atreju To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831762b7f3520488a07b75 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636831762b7f3520488a07b75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As an ideal solution, I have a suggestion to Hive contributors to make it look like Hive is doing insert/update/delete: This will require a special type of table creation syntax. I will call it as "UPDATABLE TABLE". The table will have 3 special columns that are defined in the create script: 1. The primary key column. (let's say: col_pk) 2. BIGINT type date column that shows the ms from Jan 1st, 1970 to actual data manipulation date/time in RDMBS. (dml_date) 3. TINYINT or BOOLEAN type column that will store 0 if the record is deleted and 1 if it is inserted or updated. (dml_action) This will require the RDBMS table to have PK and last update date column and deletes recorded in some other table by pk and date. On Day 1, the entire table is put into Hadoop, with addition of 2 extra columns: dml_date (bigint) and dml_action. On Day 2, we first find the max of dml_date from Hive table. Then we query from RDBMS inserts/updates/deletes since that date/time and write into a file with the correct dml_date/dml_action. The file goes to the same folder that our Hive table is in. Right now, if on Day 1 we had 100 rows and on Day 2, 10 rows a regular Hive table would show 110 rows. But, since this is a special table (UPDATABLE TABLE), every time this table is queried in Hive, Hive first run a map-reduce that would find the most recent (max(dml_date)) row per pk (group by col_pk) that is not deleted (dml_action!=0) and use that output in the user's query. That is the big idea!! Hive can have Insert/Update/Delete commands that would do nothing but create a file with rows of manipulated data with correct date and action. There can be a special "flush" kind of command that runs the MR and replaces all files in the table directory with single file. That can run weekly, monthly or may be after each time dml data received from RDBMS. Sqoop can have Hive interface that saves certain table attributes like pk column, RDBMS connection info,... and with one command from Hive, the Hive table gets updated from RDBMS.... What do you think? On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > I think that this might be the way to go. In general, folding updates and > deletes into datasets is a difficult problem due to the append-only nature > of datasets. > > Something that might help you here is to partition your tables in Hive > based on some well-distributed key. Then if you have a relatively small > number of partitions affected by an incremental import (perhaps more > recently-imported records are more likely to be updated? in this case, > partition the tables by the month/week you imported them?) you can only > perform the fold-in of the new deltas on the affected partitions. This > should be much faster than a full table scan. > > Have you seen the Sqoop tool? It handles imports and exports between HDFS > (and Hive) and RDBMS systems -- but currently can only import new records > (and subsequent INSERTs); it can't handle updates/deletes. Sqoop is > available at http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop -- it doesn't run on Apache > 0.20.3, but works on CDH (Cloudera's Distribution for Hadoop) and Hadoop > 0.21/trunk. > > This sort of capability is something I'm really interested in adding to > Sqoop. If you've got a well-run process for doing this, I'd really > appreciate your help adding this feature :) Send me an email off-list if > you're interested. At the very least, I'd urge you to try out the tool. > > Cheers, > - Aaron Kimball > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:54 PM, atreju wrote: > >> To generate smart output from base data we need to copy some base tables >> from relational database into Hadoop. Some of them are big. To dump the >> entire table into Hadoop everyday is not an option since there are like 30+ >> tables and each would take several hours. >> >> The methodology that we approached is to get the entire table dump first. >> Then each day or every 4-6 hours get only insert/update/delete since the >> last copy from RDBMS (based on a date field in the table). Using Hive do >> outer join + union the new data with existing data and write into a new >> file. For example, if there are a 100 rows in Hadoop, and in RDBMS 3 records >> inserted, 2 records updated and 1 deleted since the last Hadoop copy, then >> the Hive query will get 97 of the not changed data + 3 inserts + 2 updates >> and write into a new file. The other applications like Pig or Hive will pick >> the most recent file to use when selecting/loading data from those base >> table data files. >> >> This logic is working fine in lower environments for small size tables. >> With production data, for about 30GB size table, the incremental >> re-generation of the file in Hadoop is still taking several hours. I tried >> using zipped version and it took even longer time. I am not convinced that >> this is the best we can do to handle updates and deletes since we had to >> re-write 29GB unchanged data of the 30GB file again into a new file. ...and >> this is not the biggest table. >> >> I am thinking that this should be problem for many companies. What are the >> other approaches to apply updates and deletes on base tables to the >> Hadoop data files? >> >> We have 4 data nodes and using version 20.3. >> >> Thanks! >> >> > > --001636831762b7f3520488a07b75-- From general-return-1631-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 09 23:57:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39385 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2010 23:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Jun 2010 23:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 3002 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 23:57:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2955 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2010 23:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2945 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2010 23:57:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:57:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:57:12 +0000 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so5834315gwb.35 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:56:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KanpSzdNAIOs0U4BW9fK4LUNk9Z5f6nY7AdHtnGkAC0=; b=AF0i53Q96zAkDzC9C79ltiFhdptk0Bh2fmwClhsh4dftYYAt62I1mftIolnVe6/RRj D0N4BG1dIWqI7OG2Dk7QH4Ozw2+pZl49FjOfokQHVOcz3rX0f8XU8q99WULvCovu0lf2 43XuSYng82iReZqmhoJu+nuoRSbZ6Aj1lKeWA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Ak8w+X0kUb8P3MWsbpc8/3ejSvAw95y06P3amyb7YLlN9glke5uYi7tuUV075+Go7c 1587FsqUs6KoPejMqLQQ1PjdnFmtwoUZ6NTczf1QlLNXyhC4gYoNKCufEvzX7WGQDclA ZPgFvV+JMaqf1a1U7uTOdbMg47wY46dicacIE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.128.32 with SMTP id f32mr19067624ann.93.1276127811428; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.240.9 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:56:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:56:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5c05fe361910488a1a84c --001636c5c05fe361910488a1a84c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When hive is running the map-reduce job, how do we handle concurrent update/deletion/insertion ? On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:32 PM, atreju wrote: > As an ideal solution, I have a suggestion to Hive contributors to make it > look like Hive is doing insert/update/delete: > > > This will require a special type of table creation syntax. I will call it > as > "UPDATABLE TABLE". The table will have 3 special columns that are defined > in > the create script: > 1. The primary key column. (let's say: col_pk) > 2. BIGINT type date column that shows the ms from Jan 1st, 1970 to actual > data manipulation date/time in RDMBS. (dml_date) > 3. TINYINT or BOOLEAN type column that will store 0 if the record is > deleted > and 1 if it is inserted or updated. (dml_action) > > This will require the RDBMS table to have PK and last update date column > and > deletes recorded in some other table by pk and date. > > On Day 1, the entire table is put into Hadoop, with addition of 2 extra > columns: dml_date (bigint) and dml_action. > > On Day 2, we first find the max of dml_date from Hive table. Then we query > from RDBMS inserts/updates/deletes since that date/time and write into a > file with the correct dml_date/dml_action. The file goes to the same folder > that our Hive table is in. > > Right now, if on Day 1 we had 100 rows and on Day 2, 10 rows a regular Hive > table would show 110 rows. But, since this is a special table (UPDATABLE > TABLE), every time this table is queried in Hive, Hive first run a > map-reduce that would find the most recent (max(dml_date)) row per pk > (group > by col_pk) that is not deleted (dml_action!=0) and use that output in the > user's query. That is the big idea!! > > Hive can have Insert/Update/Delete commands that would do nothing but > create > a file with rows of manipulated data with correct date and action. > > There can be a special "flush" kind of command that runs the MR and > replaces > all files in the table directory with single file. That can run weekly, > monthly or may be after each time dml data received from RDBMS. > > Sqoop can have Hive interface that saves certain table attributes like pk > column, RDBMS connection info,... and with one command from Hive, the Hive > table gets updated from RDBMS.... > > What do you think? > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > > > I think that this might be the way to go. In general, folding updates and > > deletes into datasets is a difficult problem due to the append-only > nature > > of datasets. > > > > Something that might help you here is to partition your tables in Hive > > based on some well-distributed key. Then if you have a relatively small > > number of partitions affected by an incremental import (perhaps more > > recently-imported records are more likely to be updated? in this case, > > partition the tables by the month/week you imported them?) you can only > > perform the fold-in of the new deltas on the affected partitions. This > > should be much faster than a full table scan. > > > > Have you seen the Sqoop tool? It handles imports and exports between HDFS > > (and Hive) and RDBMS systems -- but currently can only import new > records > > (and subsequent INSERTs); it can't handle updates/deletes. Sqoop is > > available at http://github.com/cloudera/sqoop -- it doesn't run on > Apache > > 0.20.3, but works on CDH (Cloudera's Distribution for Hadoop) and Hadoop > > 0.21/trunk. > > > > This sort of capability is something I'm really interested in adding to > > Sqoop. If you've got a well-run process for doing this, I'd really > > appreciate your help adding this feature :) Send me an email off-list if > > you're interested. At the very least, I'd urge you to try out the tool. > > > > Cheers, > > - Aaron Kimball > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:54 PM, atreju wrote: > > > >> To generate smart output from base data we need to copy some base tables > >> from relational database into Hadoop. Some of them are big. To dump the > >> entire table into Hadoop everyday is not an option since there are like > 30+ > >> tables and each would take several hours. > >> > >> The methodology that we approached is to get the entire table dump > first. > >> Then each day or every 4-6 hours get only insert/update/delete since the > >> last copy from RDBMS (based on a date field in the table). Using Hive do > >> outer join + union the new data with existing data and write into a new > >> file. For example, if there are a 100 rows in Hadoop, and in RDBMS 3 > records > >> inserted, 2 records updated and 1 deleted since the last Hadoop copy, > then > >> the Hive query will get 97 of the not changed data + 3 inserts + 2 > updates > >> and write into a new file. The other applications like Pig or Hive will > pick > >> the most recent file to use when selecting/loading data from those base > >> table data files. > >> > >> This logic is working fine in lower environments for small size tables. > >> With production data, for about 30GB size table, the incremental > >> re-generation of the file in Hadoop is still taking several hours. I > tried > >> using zipped version and it took even longer time. I am not convinced > that > >> this is the best we can do to handle updates and deletes since we had to > >> re-write 29GB unchanged data of the 30GB file again into a new file. > ...and > >> this is not the biggest table. > >> > >> I am thinking that this should be problem for many companies. What are > the > >> other approaches to apply updates and deletes on base tables to the > >> Hadoop data files? > >> > >> We have 4 data nodes and using version 20.3. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > > > > > --001636c5c05fe361910488a1a84c-- From general-return-1632-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 10 00:30:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60734 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 00:30:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 00:30:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27558 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 00:30:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27472 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 00:30:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27456 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2010 00:30:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:30:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of n.atreju@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:29:58 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so3649164wyb.35 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:29:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K0keWim3Zx7GXNsbPKunmAWwQf0F/VrNuVPymgOsQrc=; b=mhaRULLwik3HP/N2ftN6RBPUZ468KZZlHCuVvTmUqFf5Du6Ogbs4WGQE34phiLm+Sr dNhFmNGz79M6P8D65B0IQVbnX9ZT3F31EYh2RkEEfZRWPJCemIjXSDgOhf4gwURu9vo5 CFRgJJhi1GW9juNTwocxFBne2wRDTpb5WXXwQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=r88xoasrydUy20NSwJ7l+w5YbFy338KKgKGUy+Ks7gy9v4F8mFY05My+Kft3Is6oO3 I/pVDr1uU6xw2zT91Cp7fpDGVGZ0ekMLvf8k+EkeXapSiERsiCvrjh0eIptQAMLM6lCe Qt+8IcQmM+waL+knOdvlJ8PYZ5FoUsIIeJ39M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.146.3 with SMTP id f3mr2665995wbv.211.1276129775600; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:29:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:29:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop From: atreju To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ef8cef646180488a21d86 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ef8cef646180488a21d86 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Insert/Update/Delete is nothing but "put" command for another file to the same directory. Only problem is during "flush" that would replace the files. I assume it would use the similar kind of logic of Hive's "insert overwrite" (create the file in a temporary space and replace the Hive file(s) when MR output is ready). Only for that "replace" (move command?) the flush has to talk to Namenode to wait for currently running MR jobs to finish and put others on hold until the file is replaced. That is of course the high level idea. I am not sure if it is practical. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > When hive is running the map-reduce job, how do we handle concurrent > update/deletion/insertion ? > > --0016364ef8cef646180488a21d86-- From general-return-1633-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 10 10:44:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95132 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 10:44:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 10:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6083 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 10:44:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5568 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 10:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5555 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2010 10:44:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:44:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ashahzad4@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:44:13 +0000 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so2130238wwe.35 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nwIAwtwy/IYRD2SYCD3usjmQhEYc7dztsnNnpzOY4JA=; b=fBj3ROLuWqh1E4HkS6EtfHY/qB2n1TyU8ARAjV7EZkA1IUXFMMd0uB5iZu4zytFlG0 bOkdfNyv5Dq70nXc1FzUk1IEgbSkwBPvt8JUN65ppgkjZzBD/V5VzxaXLG2FBHpmrLlf 5xsuv0lzNFfpqEyFABEG3p8z3LnuEyMGWjUxA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Jb5Z60bVMktY3jYRNhFr0W+9WPScgFM8Syi7IbYiAzAad8Tj4GuwRJmwAw3lK7yrKc n29JQJLXmzDKFMk434bqm87vlGQnObuxEPyEOR5xBPBNCpSjw5NleTQu/KKUCYmE3vhg s1K//hlVGRF/eiUnrED80nS1hxKIZXMI1UBAA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.151.143 with SMTP id c15mr4659050wbw.135.1276166631706; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.19 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:43:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:43:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it possible ....!!! From: Ahmad Shahzad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e657b216c1d80b0488aab2be X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e657b216c1d80b0488aab2be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi OWEN, Can you please explain it further. What do you mean by "set up socket proxies for setting up rpc connections." . I would really appreciate your reply Regards, Ahmad Shahzad On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Ahmad Shahzad wrote: > > Hi, >> I wanted to ask if it is possible to intercept every communication that >> takes place between hadoop's map reduce task i.e between JobTracker and >> TaskTracker and make it pass through my own communication library. >> > > It is possible to set up socket proxies for setting up rpc connections. > Please take this thread over to common-user@hadoop.apache.org. > > -- Owen > --0016e657b216c1d80b0488aab2be-- From general-return-1634-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 10 17:38:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35620 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 17:38:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 17:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 57658 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 17:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57530 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 17:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57522 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2010 17:38:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:38:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:38:51 +0000 Received: by yxd39 with SMTP id 39so83846yxd.35 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.142.19 with SMTP id p19mr2077372ybd.44.1276191510573; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.146.15 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:38:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [208.252.10.190] Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:38:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Using S3 native filesystem? (s3n://) From: Denis Haskin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd7547ea735a80488b07d22 --000e0cd7547ea735a80488b07d22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm having trouble getting the S3 native filesystem working, trying to use it from my local desktop. Following http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AmazonS3, I have my hdfs-site.xml as: dfs.replication 1 fs.default.name s3n://dwh-hdfs-test fs.s3n.awsAccessKeyId ..access key... fs.s3n.awsSecretAccessKey ...secret access key, with / encoded as %2F.. "bin/hadoop namenode -format" works; I end up with this structure (as seen by s3cmd): 2010-06-10 13:11 4 s3://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp/hadoop-dhaskin/mapred/system/jobtracker.info 2010-06-10 13:11 0 s3://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp/hadoop-dhaskin/mapred/system_$folder$ 2010-06-10 13:10 0 s3://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp/hadoop-dhaskin/mapred_$folder$ 2010-06-10 13:10 0 s3://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp/hadoop-dhaskin_$folder$ 2010-06-10 13:10 0 s3://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp_$folder$ but when I try something like "bin/hadoop fs -ls" I get various errors. Part of the problem is it's sort of unclear what the format of the parameter should be. See what I tried and the various errors down below, at [1] Also, when I started up the jobtracker, it fails with: 2010-06-10 13:34:08,521 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3Exception: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 HEAD request failed for '/tmp%2Fhadoop-dhaskin%2Fmapred%2Fsystem' - ResponseCode=403, ResponseMessage=Forbidden Suggestions? Thanks... [1] bin/hadoop fs -ls of various attempts: dwhsix:hadoop-0.20.2 dhaskin$ bin/hadoop fs -ls / ls: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 GET failed for '/' XML Error Message: SignatureDoesNotMatchThe request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your key and signing method.47 45 54 0a 0a 0a 54 68 75 2c 20 31 30 20 4a 75 6e 20 32 30 31 30 20 31 37 3a 33 30 3a 34 30 20 47 4d 54 0a 2f 64 77 68 2d 68 64 66 73 2d 74 65 73 74 2f098E7E853DB93FD9Y8w3ccqhj4VvWY6Ma17o5HF+8cWK3r1kiIywxAsrwSsuR2DqFpxx4+2+9Xgnn+9iw8vS4vJjm5MpkLpDbnuVcByruxw=GETThu, 10 Jun 2010 17:30:40 GMT/dwh-hdfs-test/AKIAI5UTNXFARAYFZAXQ dwhsix:hadoop-0.20.2 dhaskin$ bin/hadoop fs -ls s3n://dwh-hdfs-test ls: Path must be absolute: s3n://dwh-hdfs-test Usage: java FsShell [-ls ] dwhsix:hadoop-0.20.2 dhaskin$ bin/hadoop fs -ls s3n://dwh-hdfs-test/ ls: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 GET failed for '/' XML Error Message: SignatureDoesNotMatchThe request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided. Check your key and signing method.47 45 54 0a 0a 0a 54 68 75 2c 20 31 30 20 4a 75 6e 20 32 30 31 30 20 31 37 3a 33 30 3a 35 36 20 47 4d 54 0a 2f 64 77 68 2d 68 64 66 73 2d 74 65 73 74 2f2F7004189009A56AIQzsA5849ZnBaqGuAsFvTIt78u9oDRaBvrY5Xwg5exf85H+7/aAejxK33QPLXCueryv+zgWT3YXPbqPcMNr0F4dcWKM=GETThu, 10 Jun 2010 17:30:56 GMT/dwh-hdfs-test/AKIAI5UTNXFARAYFZAXQ dwhsix:hadoop-0.20.2 dhaskin$ bin/hadoop fs -ls s3n://dwh-hdfs-test/tmp ls: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 HEAD request failed for '/tmp' - ResponseCode=403, ResponseMessage=Forbidden dwhsix:hadoop-0.20.2 dhaskin$ bin/hadoop fs -ls /tmp ls: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 HEAD request failed for '/tmp' - ResponseCode=403, ResponseMessage=Forbidden --000e0cd7547ea735a80488b07d22-- From general-return-1635-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 10 18:45:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63048 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 18:45:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 18:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 28695 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 18:45:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28611 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2010 18:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28596 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2010 18:45:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:45:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of n.atreju@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:45:02 +0000 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so216770wwe.35 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QdlBue7x6nqIPDWMV34MalftuSISGqjfREwV4m4lmwA=; b=K8hU6s283OQWC4Tk7TPTJZPEl5uysAW1VQK1sT4AXKXEHScHM6JxcmGcexLiZqROQk l0184C9nufotTHqZiWg4Frdp8iWzRAhIx6MskL1aQ18+hJmEsc6HPNB2/aB//v01MEHX akLa3P6QvcjF3y+xudekM8ehGC9B3t8ASy/vI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nHb7CGBuSUTr24adkcdgBx2ua8i6yVGuZasPMuFX7r4et8Gxn84I3Vu98+HyrJjxMl oPAiRlB3xPXeODpWaOcHgH8qumCLizQBmZ1KtAstQNHaR6tzLEzAWNJe767uF9imi2oK MbuF5XD2pVG7F6aKnRy1H/wZ8YZpT7+G8O7Nc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.11 with SMTP id t11mr368724wee.55.1276195480313; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:44:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to apply RDBMS table updates and deletes into Hadoop From: atreju To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a25b44a1bd0488b16a95 --0016e6d9a25b44a1bd0488b16a95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you for your response. I understand... Just a few points before I accept that this is too complicated :) The main idea is to keep different versions of data under the same table, similar to HBase but this is row level and you don't have to make the other versions accessible from Hive but only the most recent one. You just need to create an access layer to work on the most recent version of the row. If you can think of a different way of uniquely identifying a row to know the versions of it and timestamp (or counter or version #??) to know the most recent one, it doesn't have to be the columns that I specified before. It can be a different file that you create in the background (which can also be the index file!!). Oracle has ROWID for physical location of the row and locks it before the data manipulation. Hadoop has advantage of storage and map-reduce. So why not use it and keep all versions of changed data and access it via map-reduce for the most recent one. Accessing the data can get slower over time when there are many versions. And that can be fixed with flush or full replication of data time to time in a maintenance window by the end user. Hive is a great tool to access and manipulate Hadoop files. You are doing an amazing job. I have no idea what are the complications you face each day. Just disregard if I am talking nonsense to you keep up the good work! Cheers! Atreju, > > Your work is great. Personally I would not get too tied up in the > transactional side of hive. Once you start dealing with locking and > concurrency the problem becomes tricky. > > We hivers have a long time tradition on 'punting' on complicated stuff we > do not want to deal with. :) Thus we only have 'Insert Overwrite' no 'insert > update' :) > > Again, I think you wrote a really cool application. It would make a great > use case, blog post, or a stand alone application. Call it HiveMysqlRsync or > something :). However you mention several requirements that are specific to > your application timestamp and primary key. If you can abstract all your > application specific logic it could make it's way into hive. But it might be > a stand alone program because hive to rdbms replication might be a little > out of scope. > > Edward > --0016e6d9a25b44a1bd0488b16a95-- From general-return-1636-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 13 17:50:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74475 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2010 17:50:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Jun 2010 17:50:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 85312 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2010 17:50:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85246 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2010 17:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85238 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2010 17:50:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:50:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:50:41 +0000 Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so2263656wwb.35 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.16 with SMTP id v16mr1508657wee.111.1276451420710; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.20 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:50:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: fbus project From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All: I just pushed an extremely early stage project called fbus[1] to github. This project is meant to facilitate moving complete files between various configurable end points including HDFS. Spring and Spring Integration are used as the underbelly and allow users to wire up channels and move files around. Current tested end point wiring: * Local -> HDFS * Local -> Local The plan is to extend this to be bidirectional and incorporate various other management features. Spring Integration was chosen so that additional end points may be used (FTP, SSH transports, etc.) and other nice messaging features can be used (wire tapping, transformation, content based routing, etc.). Warning: This is very early stage and not production quality. I wanted to throw this out there for those who are interested. Potential fun uses: * Fire events over JMS or AMQP as files arrive to update management UIs. * Monitor file movement. * Implement a standard for file queuing and configuration. * Batch and aggregate files on a schedule. This project is for fun. If people find it useful / interesting, I'll continue it. Feedback, bug reports, feature requests, and help are all welcome. [1] http://github.com/esammer/fbus -- Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1637-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 05:26:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26791 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 05:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 05:26:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 82527 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 03:37:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82152 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 03:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82137 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 03:36:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:36:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdixon@omniti.com designates 8.8.38.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [8.8.38.6] (HELO edge.omniti.com) (8.8.38.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 03:36:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=omniti.com; s=s1024; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@omniti.com; t=1276572991; h=From:Subject:Date:To; bh=fcTp9JvINuMjraDaL8IFq6pQtqaoHIjjqR3Loya4xLU=; b=MASlM50JolKvGqYHTVoGJmBVVyNZ9CN2wGx4hm8Cvc2t7mXHBwy7mvRO6LjKpTCv TKOGcGp4ci8bxadLJz+Yal0I8xbU7ex0g1aMFDdX/ZZOy7Dqx+TNYwc/0zbMnXtN WtcTyG7Gzfr/ClNHHmkXWQPlzEDxi1RGDlT94+PKrLM=; Authentication-Results: edge smtp.user=jdixon@omniti.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [68.55.0.29] ([68.55.0.29:53420] helo=omniti.com) by edge (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.35 r(26636M)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 9E/3C-17327-F35F61C4; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:36:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:36:27 -0400 From: Jason Dixon To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: CFP for Surge Scalability Conference 2010 Message-ID: <20100615033627.GA29381@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We're excited to announce Surge, the Scalability and Performance Conference, to be held in Baltimore on Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010. The event focuses on case studies that demonstrate successes (and failures) in Web applications and Internet architectures. Our Keynote speakers include John Allspaw and Theo Schlossnagle. We are currently accepting submissions for the Call For Papers through July 9th. You can find more information, including our current list of speakers, online: http://omniti.com/surge/2010 If you've been to Velocity, or wanted to but couldn't afford it, then Surge is just what you've been waiting for. For more information, including CFP, sponsorship of the event, or participating as an exhibitor, please contact us at surge@omniti.com. Thanks, -- Jason Dixon OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. jdixon@omniti.com 443.325.1357 x.241 From general-return-1638-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 12:32:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75936 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 12:32:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 12:32:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 81524 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 12:32:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81054 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 12:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81045 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 12:32:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:32:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.187] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:31:54 +0000 Received: from smarthost.q2web.local (pd95b3aaa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.58.170]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MeOiZ-1Obu7o12I3-00Q3fy; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:31:31 +0200 Received: from amidalasrv.q2web.local (amidalasrv.q2web.local [192.168.0.2]) by smarthost.q2web.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C80C6F4E8 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:06:58 +0200 (CEST) x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: HDFS file append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB0C86.AE8BFF30" Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:31:29 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HDFS file append Thread-Index: AcsMhq26Nayx56VkR/OCZWnlnUkiUw== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_St=F6cker?= To: X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19NEHJ8ZtuvCxDhhDIkQI18+8nhe/TNnhvrN5f MRmASLH/gt7o1G7TZqJLgH6y6abE7X7229wGLvDP1ppnfgllW7 mPDLwW/YBV7KkxrS4ycZw== ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0C86.AE8BFF30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, =20 in the hdfs-default.xml, I found the warning that the property "dfs.support.append" is false by default, because of the "append code" containing bugs. For our test case (which is not very complicated), I tried it out nevertheless (in a C program using libhdfs), and I did not encounter any problems yet. The only thing I noticed is that the modification date of the file to which I append is not changed. =20 Could someone indicate which other bugs may occur? And in which cases? Because the append could be quite useful for me, and I would like to know the risk. =20 Thanks in advance Jan ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0C86.AE8BFF30-- From general-return-1639-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 14:08:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12561 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 14:08:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 14:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 27023 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 14:08:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26936 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 14:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26928 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 14:07:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:07:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vidur@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:07:53 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1277215648.31262@+q2DNmYv3ZPAVSiB/GgbHA Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5FE7R6k014727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:37:27 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id o5FE7QTE014723; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to vidur@localhost using -f Received: from 122.169.128.82 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vidur) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <43519.122.169.128.82.1276610846.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: Hadoop error From: "Vidur Goyal" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5FE7R6k014727 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: vidur@students.iiit.ac.in X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5, No Hi, I am trying to set up a development cluster for hadoop 0.20.1 in eclipse. I used this url http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.2/ to check out the build. I compiled "compile , compile-core-test , and eclipse-files" using ant. Then when I build the project , I am getting errors in bin/benchmarks directory. I have followed the screencast from cloudera http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/04/configuring-eclipse-for-hadoop-development-a-screencast/. The error log is : Description Resource Path Location Type FileInputFormat cannot be resolved CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 84 Java Problem FileOutputFormat cannot be resolved CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 86 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 64 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 65 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 65 Java Problem Mapper cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 33 Java Problem MapReduceBase cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 32 Java Problem MapReduceBase cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 50 Java Problem OutputCollector cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 39 Java Problem OutputCollector cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 54 Java Problem Reducer cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 51 Java Problem Reporter cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 40 Java Problem Reporter cannot be resolved to a type CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 55 Java Problem The declared package "org.apache.hadoop.mapred" does not match the expected package "gridmix2.src.java.org.apache.hadoop.mapred" CombinerJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 19 Java Problem FileInputFormat cannot be resolved GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 52 Java Problem FileInputFormat cannot be resolved GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 69 Java Problem FileOutputFormat cannot be resolved GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 47 Java Problem JobClient cannot be resolved to a type GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 58 Java Problem JobClient cannot be resolved to a type GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 58 Java Problem The declared package "org.apache.hadoop.mapred" does not match the expected package "gridmix2.src.java.org.apache.hadoop.mapred" GenericMRLoadJobCreator.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 19 Java Problem Counters cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 496 Java Problem Counters cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 501 Java Problem Counters cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 503 Java Problem FileInputFormat cannot be resolved GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 160 Java Problem FileOutputFormat cannot be resolved GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 161 Java Problem JobClient cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 486 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 123 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 145 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 145 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 192 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 220 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 263 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 300 Java Problem JobConf cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 487 Java Problem JobID cannot be resolved GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 495 Java Problem JobID cannot be resolved GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 509 Java Problem JobID cannot be resolved GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 511 Java Problem TaskReport cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 509 Java Problem TaskReport cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 510 Java Problem TaskReport cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 522 Java Problem TaskReport cannot be resolved to a type GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 544 Java Problem The declared package "org.apache.hadoop.mapred" does not match the expected package "gridmix2.src.java.org.apache.hadoop.mapred" GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 19 Java Problem The method createJob(String[]) from the type CombinerJobCreator refers to the missing type JobConf GridMixRunner.java /hadoop-0.20.3/src/benchmarks/gridmix2/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred line 220 Java Problem I am using eclipse galileo. Thanks, Vidur -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-1640-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 15:25:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53917 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 15:25:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 15:25:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 69203 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 15:25:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69123 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 15:25:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69115 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 15:25:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:25:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_FRT_STOCK1,T_FRT_STOCK2 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:25:10 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so811118iwn.35 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.0.135 with SMTP id 7mr2611921icc.57.1276615489410; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.141 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:24:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 08:24:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS file append To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba180eb4c2d7ab04891334c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba180eb4c2d7ab04891334c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jan St=F6cker wrot= e: > Hello, > > > > in the hdfs-default.xml, I found the warning that the property > > "dfs.support.append" is false by default, because of the "append > > code" containing bugs. > > For our test case (which is not very complicated), I tried it out > > nevertheless (in a C program using libhdfs), and I did not > > encounter any problems yet. The only thing I noticed is that the > > modification date of the file to which I append is not changed. > > > > Could someone indicate which other bugs may occur? And in > > which cases? Because the append could be quite useful for me, > > and I would like to know the risk. > Mostly in failure handling cases, but not entirely. The result is usually truncated files, sometimes truncated as if your append didn't happen, sometimes the entire last block going missing. Look for the 0.20-append fix version on JIRA for a more significantly list. I'd recommend waiting a couple weeks and using the hadoop-0.20-append branc= h which will contain fixes for many of these bugs. -Todd --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba180eb4c2d7ab04891334c7-- From general-return-1641-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 16:53:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88858 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 16:53:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 16:53:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 97343 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 16:53:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97285 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 16:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97277 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 16:53:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:53:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_FRT_STOCK1,T_FRT_STOCK2,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.193] (HELO mail-yw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.211.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:53:43 +0000 Received: by ywh31 with SMTP id 31so4033648ywh.20 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:53:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6Gw/O5PHeqZ861mQUl+7RT3EgJUGsBmMLU+Ca6WoP98=; b=TThyIL7MbAuKFQ/JjE1oYh5E7x84ZUjYy9VGS8tCm5qNi+CpwRG//N92rZt/1YqAza d8PrfeEVoTrVo5dHbnpoySHv6NZ4N0iPB9UxS0C9UJKj3cysAPaITwZw6dV8cpgpJdvK n9mqltiMdmbJSfs6vd5kuFy34a3L60km4F4UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JCYZc2hdc8FzFK5QG1J4KKDHMZrwfhbC+sURRNG3nOfwF/DmX+mIWdatYRw/BSxVLB 76YPO3XMbaHFRuV05s7S270wlTcfqJjliNeLJsorqoNaHk3XNaOtDvqjhIZlq5M0+H2a wgm5iIrmaOROLWjiqQKEt5zI2QFU055Dd//Sc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.2.1 with SMTP id 1mr9254803ybb.65.1276620802610; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.145.16 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:53:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:53:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS file append From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4879074691204891471e2 --000e0cd4879074691204891471e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You can start downloading and using the code form the hadoop-0.20-append. thanks, dhruba On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jan St=F6cker > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > in the hdfs-default.xml, I found the warning that the property > > > > "dfs.support.append" is false by default, because of the "append > > > > code" containing bugs. > > > > For our test case (which is not very complicated), I tried it out > > > > nevertheless (in a C program using libhdfs), and I did not > > > > encounter any problems yet. The only thing I noticed is that the > > > > modification date of the file to which I append is not changed. > > > > > > > > Could someone indicate which other bugs may occur? And in > > > > which cases? Because the append could be quite useful for me, > > > > and I would like to know the risk. > > > > Mostly in failure handling cases, but not entirely. The result is usually > truncated files, sometimes truncated as if your append didn't happen, > sometimes the entire last block going missing. Look for the 0.20-append f= ix > version on JIRA for a more significantly list. > > I'd recommend waiting a couple weeks and using the hadoop-0.20-append > branch > which will contain fixes for many of these bugs. > > -Todd > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --=20 Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd4879074691204891471e2-- From general-return-1642-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 16:56:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89152 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 16:56:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 16:56:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 98932 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 16:56:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98878 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 16:56:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98868 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 16:56:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:56:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_FRT_STOCK1,T_FRT_STOCK2 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:56:00 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so943536iwn.35 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.193.93 with SMTP id dt29mr8760677ibb.71.1276620939350; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:55:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.141 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:55:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS file append To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c1af9a5bc204891479ea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502c1af9a5bc204891479ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > You can start downloading and using the code form the hadoop-0.20-append. > > Though it's still missing some patches, so I'd recommend SVN checkouts and watching the branch :) -Todd > thanks, > dhruba > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jan St=F6cker > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > in the hdfs-default.xml, I found the warning that the property > > > > > > "dfs.support.append" is false by default, because of the "append > > > > > > code" containing bugs. > > > > > > For our test case (which is not very complicated), I tried it out > > > > > > nevertheless (in a C program using libhdfs), and I did not > > > > > > encounter any problems yet. The only thing I noticed is that the > > > > > > modification date of the file to which I append is not changed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone indicate which other bugs may occur? And in > > > > > > which cases? Because the append could be quite useful for me, > > > > > > and I would like to know the risk. > > > > > > > Mostly in failure handling cases, but not entirely. The result is usual= ly > > truncated files, sometimes truncated as if your append didn't happen, > > sometimes the entire last block going missing. Look for the 0.20-append > fix > > version on JIRA for a more significantly list. > > > > I'd recommend waiting a couple weeks and using the hadoop-0.20-append > > branch > > which will contain fixes for many of these bugs. > > > > -Todd > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00504502c1af9a5bc204891479ea-- From general-return-1643-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 17:10:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99268 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 17:10:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 17:10:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 47526 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 17:10:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47488 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 17:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47480 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 17:10:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:10:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [137.100.120.43] (HELO mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com) (137.100.120.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:10:14 +0000 Received: from ([160.207.224.15]) by mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5202712.271944112; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:09:50 -0500 Received: from MAPF01-MAIL01.ad.gd-ais.com ([166.16.220.104]) by mnbm01-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:09:50 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB0CAD.8E2D6654" Subject: IPC connections failing Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:09:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IPC connections failing Thread-Index: AcsMrY4jFCWs2PEdSUOSR7UUsnezQA== From: "Kilbride, James P." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2010 17:09:50.0724 (UTC) FILETIME=[90BAFC40:01CB0CAD] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0CAD.8E2D6654 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've tried to move my system from pseudo distributed to full distributed(with it being the first node in the full cluster I'll be setting up) but the components don't seem to be talking to each other and I find logs filled with ipc.Client connection failures.=20 Here's the basic log info: DataNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:42,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:49,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:50,343 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:51,354 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:53,641 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:54,733 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:55,737 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:56,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:57,827 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:58,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,833 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... 2010-06-15 12:43:01,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,844 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,849 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:05,852 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:06,855 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,858 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:08,883 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:09,970 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... JobTracker: 2010-06-15 12:42:52,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting JobTracker STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:53,350 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Scheduler configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) 2010-06-15 12:42:53,815 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DJobTracker, port=3D54311 2010-06-15 12:42:53,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog 2010-06-15 12:42:55,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the listener on 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: listener.getLocalPort() returned 50030 webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound to port 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,402 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 2010-06-15 12:42:56,802 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50030 2010-06-15 12:42:56,805 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker up at: 54311 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker webserver: 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:58,076 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,080 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:00,083 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:01,086 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,089 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,095 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:05,174 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:06,177 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,180 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,185 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: problem cleaning system directory: null java.net.ConnectException: Call to /10.28.208.118:54310 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:207) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:170) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileS ystem.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1390) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:196) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1665) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:183) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3702) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.ja va:206) at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:860) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) ... 16 more NameNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:38,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:38,922 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DNameNode, port=3D54310 2010-06-15 12:42:38,932 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: centoshadoop/10.28.208.118:54310 2010-06-15 12:42:38,938 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull 2010-06-15 12:42:38,941 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-06-15 12:42:39,140 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dhadoop,users,hadoop 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue 2010-06-15 12:42:39,156 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-06-15 12:42:39,161 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2010-06-15 12:42:39,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files =3D 28 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under construction =3D 0 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 2780 loaded in 0 seconds. 2010-06-15 12:42:39,429 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "" at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav a:48) at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:431) at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.readLong(FSEditLog.java :1273) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.j ava:670) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java: 992) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java: 812) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSI mage.java:364) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirecto ry.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesys tem.java:311) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem. java:292) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java :201) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279 ) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode. java:956) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) SecondaryNameNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:53,227 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting SecondaryNameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:53,442 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DSecondaryNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull 2010-06-15 12:42:55,651 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:56,659 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:57,662 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:58,665 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,668 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:00,671 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:01,674 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,677 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,679 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,682 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,685 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... 2010-06-15 12:43:06,691 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,694 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:08,697 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:09,700 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,703 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:11,706 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:12,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:13,712 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:14,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:15,717 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:15,718 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... TaskTracker: 2010-06-15 12:42:57,270 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting TaskTracker STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:57,854 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog 2010-06-15 12:42:58,328 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the listener on 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: listener.getLocalPort() returned 50060 webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound to port 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,345 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 2010-06-15 12:42:58,852 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,860 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DTaskTracker, sessionId=3D 2010-06-15 12:42:58,882 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DTaskTracker, port=3D50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,960 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server Responder: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,962 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server listener on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 2 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 0 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: TaskTracker up at: localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Starting tracker tracker_centoshadoop:localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 3 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 1 on 50758: starting The config files are: core-site.xml: hadoop.tmp.dir /hadoop-0.20.2/tmp/dir/hadoop-${user.name} A base for the other temporary directories. true fs.default.name hdfs://10.28.208.118:54310 The name of the default file system. A URI whose scheme and auth ority determine the filesystem implementation. The uri's scheme determines the c onfig property (fs.SCHEME.impl) name the FileSystem implementation class. The ur i's authority is used to determine the host, port, etc for a filesystem true hadoop-env.sh # Set Hadoop-specific environment variables here. # The only required environment variable is JAVA_HOME. All others are # optional. When running a distributed configuration it is best to # set JAVA_HOME in this file, so that it is correctly defined on # remote nodes. # The java implementation to use. Required. export JAVA_HOME=3D/usr/java/default # The hadoop home directory export HADOOP_HOME=3D/hadoop-0.20.2 # Extra Java CLASSPATH elements. Optional. export HADOOP_CLASSPATH=3D/hbase-0.20.4/lib/zookeeper-3.2.2.jar:/habase-0.20.4/h= b ase-0.20.4-test.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/hbase-0.20.4.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/conf # The maximum amount of heap to use, in MB. Default is 1000. # export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D2000 # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. export HADOOP_OPTS=3D-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue # Command specific options appended to HADOOP_OPTS when specified export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS" export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS" # export HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS=3D # The following applies to multiple commands (fs, dfs, fsck, distcp etc) # export HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS # Extra ssh options. Empty by default. # export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"-o ConnectTimeout=3D1 -o SendEnv=3DHADOOP_CONF_DIR" # Where log files are stored. $HADOOP_HOME/logs by default. # export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs # File naming remote slave hosts. $HADOOP_HOME/conf/slaves by default. # export HADOOP_SLAVES=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/conf/slaves # host:path where hadoop code should be rsync'd from. Unset by default. # export HADOOP_MASTER=3Dmaster:/home/$USER/src/hadoop # Seconds to sleep between slave commands. Unset by default. This # can be useful in large clusters, where, e.g., slave rsyncs can # otherwise arrive faster than the master can service them. # export HADOOP_SLAVE_SLEEP=3D0.1 # The directory where pid files are stored. /tmp by default. # export HADOOP_PID_DIR=3D/var/hadoop/pids # A string representing this instance of hadoop. $USER by default. # export HADOOP_IDENT_STRING=3D$USER # The scheduling priority for daemon processes. See 'man nice'. # export HADOOP_NICENESS=3D10 hdfs-site.xml dfs.replication 22 Default block replication. The actual number of replications can be specified when the file is created. Default is used if not specified at creation time. true dfs.data.dir /hadoop-0.20.2/hadoopDataStore/data DFS Data Directory true masters: 10.28.208.118 slaves: 10.28.208.118 (And because I know it'll be asked) hosts: # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost=20 ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6=20 10.28.208.118 centoshadoop centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com Why is this failing to stand up? I'd like to get this one node working before I stand up any other data nodes.(Firewall, btw, is turned off) James Kilbride ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0CAD.8E2D6654-- From general-return-1644-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 17:11:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99794 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 17:11:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 17:11:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 52068 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 17:11:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51889 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 17:11:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51879 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 17:11:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:11:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:11:31 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.36087912; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:11:09 -0700 Received: from MAPF01-MAIL01.ad.gd-ais.com ([166.16.220.104]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:11:09 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: IPC connections failing Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IPC connections failing Thread-Index: AcsMrY4jFCWs2PEdSUOSR7UUsnezQAAACltA References: From: "Kilbride, James P." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2010 17:11:09.0072 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF6DF100:01CB0CAD] Forgot to add on mapred-site.xml: mapred.job.tracker hdfs://10.28.208.118:54311 The host and port that the MapReduce job tracker runs at. If "local", then the jobs are run in-process as a single map and reduce task. true -----Original Message----- From: Kilbride, James P. [mailto:James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:10 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: IPC connections failing I've tried to move my system from pseudo distributed to full distributed(with it being the first node in the full cluster I'll be setting up) but the components don't seem to be talking to each other and I find logs filled with ipc.Client connection failures.=20 Here's the basic log info: DataNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:42,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:49,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:50,343 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:51,354 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:53,641 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:54,733 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:55,737 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:56,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:57,827 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:58,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,833 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... 2010-06-15 12:43:01,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,844 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,849 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:05,852 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:06,855 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,858 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:08,883 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:09,970 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... JobTracker: 2010-06-15 12:42:52,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting JobTracker STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:53,350 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Scheduler configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, limitMaxMemForMapTasks, limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) 2010-06-15 12:42:53,815 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DJobTracker, port=3D54311 2010-06-15 12:42:53,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog 2010-06-15 12:42:55,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the listener on 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: listener.getLocalPort() returned 50030 webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound to port 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:55,402 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 2010-06-15 12:42:56,802 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50030 2010-06-15 12:42:56,805 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker up at: 54311 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: JobTracker webserver: 50030 2010-06-15 12:42:58,076 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,080 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:00,083 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:01,086 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,089 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,095 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:05,174 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:06,177 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,180 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,185 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: problem cleaning system directory: null java.net.ConnectException: Call to /10.28.208.118:54310 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:207) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:170) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileS ystem.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1390) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:196) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1665) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:183) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3702) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.ja va:206) at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:860) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) ... 16 more NameNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:38,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:38,922 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DNameNode, port=3D54310 2010-06-15 12:42:38,932 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: centoshadoop/10.28.208.118:54310 2010-06-15 12:42:38,938 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull 2010-06-15 12:42:38,941 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-06-15 12:42:39,140 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dhadoop,users,hadoop 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue 2010-06-15 12:42:39,156 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-06-15 12:42:39,161 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2010-06-15 12:42:39,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files =3D 28 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under construction =3D 0 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 2780 loaded in 0 seconds. 2010-06-15 12:42:39,429 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "" at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav a:48) at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:431) at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.readLong(FSEditLog.java :1273) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.j ava:670) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java: 992) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java: 812) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSI mage.java:364) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirecto ry.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesys tem.java:311) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem. java:292) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java :201) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279 ) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode. java:956) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) SecondaryNameNode: 2010-06-15 12:42:53,227 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting SecondaryNameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:53,442 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DSecondaryNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull 2010-06-15 12:42:55,651 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:56,659 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:57,662 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:58,665 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:42:59,668 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:00,671 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:01,674 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:02,677 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:03,679 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,682 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:04,685 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... 2010-06-15 12:43:06,691 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:07,694 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:08,697 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:09,700 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:10,703 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:11,706 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:12,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:13,712 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:14,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:15,717 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). 2010-06-15 12:43:15,718 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... TaskTracker: 2010-06-15 12:42:57,270 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting TaskTracker STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-06-15 12:42:57,854 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog 2010-06-15 12:42:58,328 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the listener on 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: listener.getLocalPort() returned 50060 webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound to port 50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,345 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 2010-06-15 12:42:58,852 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50060 2010-06-15 12:42:58,860 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DTaskTracker, sessionId=3D 2010-06-15 12:42:58,882 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DTaskTracker, port=3D50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,960 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server Responder: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,962 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server listener on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 2 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 0 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: TaskTracker up at: localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Starting tracker tracker_centoshadoop:localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 3 on 50758: starting 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 1 on 50758: starting The config files are: core-site.xml: hadoop.tmp.dir /hadoop-0.20.2/tmp/dir/hadoop-${user.name} A base for the other temporary directories. true fs.default.name hdfs://10.28.208.118:54310 The name of the default file system. A URI whose scheme and auth ority determine the filesystem implementation. The uri's scheme determines the c onfig property (fs.SCHEME.impl) name the FileSystem implementation class. The ur i's authority is used to determine the host, port, etc for a filesystem true hadoop-env.sh # Set Hadoop-specific environment variables here. # The only required environment variable is JAVA_HOME. All others are # optional. When running a distributed configuration it is best to # set JAVA_HOME in this file, so that it is correctly defined on # remote nodes. # The java implementation to use. Required. export JAVA_HOME=3D/usr/java/default # The hadoop home directory export HADOOP_HOME=3D/hadoop-0.20.2 # Extra Java CLASSPATH elements. Optional. export HADOOP_CLASSPATH=3D/hbase-0.20.4/lib/zookeeper-3.2.2.jar:/habase-0.20.4/h= b ase-0.20.4-test.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/hbase-0.20.4.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/conf # The maximum amount of heap to use, in MB. Default is 1000. # export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D2000 # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. export HADOOP_OPTS=3D-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue # Command specific options appended to HADOOP_OPTS when specified export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS" export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS" export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS" # export HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS=3D # The following applies to multiple commands (fs, dfs, fsck, distcp etc) # export HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS # Extra ssh options. Empty by default. # export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"-o ConnectTimeout=3D1 -o SendEnv=3DHADOOP_CONF_DIR" # Where log files are stored. $HADOOP_HOME/logs by default. # export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs # File naming remote slave hosts. $HADOOP_HOME/conf/slaves by default. # export HADOOP_SLAVES=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/conf/slaves # host:path where hadoop code should be rsync'd from. Unset by default. # export HADOOP_MASTER=3Dmaster:/home/$USER/src/hadoop # Seconds to sleep between slave commands. Unset by default. This # can be useful in large clusters, where, e.g., slave rsyncs can # otherwise arrive faster than the master can service them. # export HADOOP_SLAVE_SLEEP=3D0.1 # The directory where pid files are stored. /tmp by default. # export HADOOP_PID_DIR=3D/var/hadoop/pids # A string representing this instance of hadoop. $USER by default. # export HADOOP_IDENT_STRING=3D$USER # The scheduling priority for daemon processes. See 'man nice'. # export HADOOP_NICENESS=3D10 hdfs-site.xml dfs.replication 22 Default block replication. The actual number of replications can be specified when the file is created. Default is used if not specified at creation time. true dfs.data.dir /hadoop-0.20.2/hadoopDataStore/data DFS Data Directory true masters: 10.28.208.118 slaves: 10.28.208.118 (And because I know it'll be asked) hosts: # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost=20 ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6=20 10.28.208.118 centoshadoop centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com Why is this failing to stand up? I'd like to get this one node working before I stand up any other data nodes.(Firewall, btw, is turned off) James Kilbride From general-return-1645-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 19:00:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48068 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 19:00:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 19:00:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 55641 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 19:00:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55457 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 19:00:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55448 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 19:00:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:00:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dms@facebook.com designates 69.63.178.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.178.185] (HELO mx-out.facebook.com) (69.63.178.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:00:24 +0000 Received: from [10.18.255.133] ([10.18.255.133:25872] helo=mail.thefacebook.com) by mta005.snc1.facebook.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r(34067)) with ESMTP id 86/1B-23452-0BDC71C4; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:00:00 -0700 Received: from sc-hub06.TheFacebook.com (192.168.18.83) by sc-hub04.TheFacebook.com (192.168.18.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.694.1; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:00:00 -0700 Received: from SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.100]) by sc-hub06.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.83]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:00:00 -0700 From: Dmytro Molkov To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:59:59 -0700 Subject: Re: IPC connections failing Thread-Topic: IPC connections failing Thread-Index: AcsMvPQdWK0LvVs4T5ugXLeUE9GxOA== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Based on the log of the namenode I do not think it started successfully. Seems like your edits log is corrupted org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.java= :670) So all other parts of the system could not connect to the namenode because = it was down, not because of IPC problems. On Jun 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Kilbride, James P. wrote: > Forgot to add on mapred-site.xml: > > > > > > > > > mapred.job.tracker > hdfs://10.28.208.118:54311 > The host and port that the MapReduce job tracker runs > at. If "local", then the jobs are run in-process as a single map and > reduce task. > true > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kilbride, James P. [mailto:James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:10 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: IPC connections failing > > I've tried to move my system from pseudo distributed to full > distributed(with it being the first node in the full cluster I'll be > setting up) but the components don't seem to be talking to each other > and I find logs filled with ipc.Client connection failures. > > Here's the basic log info: > DataNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:42,824 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:49,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:50,343 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:51,354 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,641 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:54,733 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,737 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,827 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,833 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,844 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,849 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:05,852 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,855 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,858 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:08,883 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:09,970 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > > JobTracker: > 2010-06-15 12:42:52,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting JobTracker > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,350 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > Scheduler configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, > memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, limitMaxMemForMapTasks, > limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,815 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DJobTracker, port=3D54311 > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port > returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is > -1. Opening the listener on 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: > listener.getLocalPort() returned 50030 > webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty > bound to port 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,402 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,802 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started > SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,805 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker up at: 54311 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker webserver: 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,076 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,080 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:00,083 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,086 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,089 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,095 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:05,174 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,177 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,180 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,185 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > problem cleaning system directory: null > java.net.ConnectException: Call to /10.28.208.118:54310 failed on > connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:106) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:207) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:170) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileS > ystem.java:82) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1390) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:196) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1665) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:183) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:175) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3702) > Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) > at > org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.ja > va:206) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:860) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) > ... 16 more > > NameNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,714 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,922 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DNameNode, port=3D54310 > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,932 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: > centoshadoop/10.28.208.118:54310 > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,938 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,941 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: > Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,140 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > fsOwner=3Dhadoop,users,hadoop > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > supergroup=3Dsupergroup > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,156 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: > Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,161 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered > FSNamesystemStatusMBean > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,381 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files =3D 28 > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under > construction =3D 0 > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 2780 > loaded in 0 seconds. > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,429 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "" > at > java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav > a:48) > at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:431) > at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.readLong(FSEditLog.java > :1273) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.j > ava:670) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java: > 992) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java: > 812) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSI > mage.java:364) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirecto > ry.java:87) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesys > tem.java:311) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem. > java:292) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java > :201) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279 > ) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode. > java:956) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) > > SecondaryNameNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,227 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting SecondaryNameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,442 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DSecondaryNameNode, > sessionId=3Dnull > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,651 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,659 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,662 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,665 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,668 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:00,671 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,674 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,677 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,679 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,682 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,685 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,691 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,694 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:08,697 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:09,700 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,703 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:11,706 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:12,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:13,712 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:14,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:15,717 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:15,718 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > > TaskTracker: > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,270 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting TaskTracker > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,854 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,328 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port > returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is > -1. Opening the listener on 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: > listener.getLocalPort() returned 50060 > webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty > bound to port 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,345 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,852 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started > SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,860 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DTaskTracker, sessionId=3D > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,882 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DTaskTracker, port=3D50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,960 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > Responder: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,962 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > listener on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 2 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 0 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > TaskTracker up at: localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > Starting tracker > tracker_centoshadoop:localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 3 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 1 on 50758: starting > > The config files are: > core-site.xml: > > > > > > > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /hadoop-0.20.2/tmp/dir/hadoop-${user.name} > A base for the other temporary > directories. > true > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://10.28.208.118:54310 > The name of the default file system. A URI whose scheme > and auth > ority determine the filesystem implementation. The uri's scheme > determines the c > onfig property (fs.SCHEME.impl) name the FileSystem implementation > class. The ur > i's authority is used to determine the host, port, etc for a > filesystem > true > > > > > hadoop-env.sh > # Set Hadoop-specific environment variables here. > > # The only required environment variable is JAVA_HOME. All others are > # optional. When running a distributed configuration it is best to > # set JAVA_HOME in this file, so that it is correctly defined on > # remote nodes. > > # The java implementation to use. Required. > export JAVA_HOME=3D/usr/java/default > > # The hadoop home directory > export HADOOP_HOME=3D/hadoop-0.20.2 > > # Extra Java CLASSPATH elements. Optional. > export > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=3D/hbase-0.20.4/lib/zookeeper-3.2.2.jar:/habase-0.20.4/h= b > ase-0.20.4-test.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/hbase-0.20.4.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/conf > > # The maximum amount of heap to use, in MB. Default is 1000. > # export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D2000 > > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > export HADOOP_OPTS=3D-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue > > # Command specific options appended to HADOOP_OPTS when specified > export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS" > export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS" > # export HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS=3D > # The following applies to multiple commands (fs, dfs, fsck, distcp etc) > # export HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS > > # Extra ssh options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"-o ConnectTimeout=3D1 -o > SendEnv=3DHADOOP_CONF_DIR" > > # Where log files are stored. $HADOOP_HOME/logs by default. > # export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs > > # File naming remote slave hosts. $HADOOP_HOME/conf/slaves by default. > # export HADOOP_SLAVES=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/conf/slaves > > # host:path where hadoop code should be rsync'd from. Unset by default. > # export HADOOP_MASTER=3Dmaster:/home/$USER/src/hadoop > > # Seconds to sleep between slave commands. Unset by default. This > # can be useful in large clusters, where, e.g., slave rsyncs can > # otherwise arrive faster than the master can service them. > # export HADOOP_SLAVE_SLEEP=3D0.1 > > # The directory where pid files are stored. /tmp by default. > # export HADOOP_PID_DIR=3D/var/hadoop/pids > > # A string representing this instance of hadoop. $USER by default. > # export HADOOP_IDENT_STRING=3D$USER > > # The scheduling priority for daemon processes. See 'man nice'. > # export HADOOP_NICENESS=3D10 > > hdfs-site.xml > > > > > > > > dfs.replication > 22 > Default block replication. The actual number of > replications can be specified when the file is created. Default is used > if not specified at creation time. > true > > > dfs.data.dir > /hadoop-0.20.2/hadoopDataStore/data > DFS Data Directory > true > > > > > masters: > 10.28.208.118 > > slaves: > 10.28.208.118 > > (And because I know it'll be asked) > hosts: > # Do not remove the following line, or various programs > # that require network functionality will fail. > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 > 10.28.208.118 centoshadoop centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com > > Why is this failing to stand up? I'd like to get this one node working > before I stand up any other data nodes.(Firewall, btw, is turned off) > > James Kilbride From general-return-1646-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 15 19:47:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71255 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 19:47:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 19:47:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 20605 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 19:46:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20484 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 19:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20476 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 19:46:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:46:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.5.164.99] (HELO camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com) (192.5.164.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:46:50 +0000 Received: from ([10.73.100.22]) by camv02-relay2.casc.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5203374.36116650; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:46:25 -0700 Received: from MAPF01-MAIL01.ad.gd-ais.com ([166.16.220.104]) by camv02-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:46:25 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: IPC connections failing Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:46:23 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IPC connections failing Thread-Index: AcsMvPQdWK0LvVs4T5ugXLeUE9GxOAABl81Q References: From: "Kilbride, James P." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2010 19:46:25.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[704D47E0:01CB0CC3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How do I repair that and prevent it from happening again? James Kilbride -----Original Message----- From: Dmytro Molkov [mailto:dms@facebook.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:00 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: IPC connections failing Based on the log of the namenode I do not think it started successfully. Seems like your edits log is corrupted org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.j ava:670) So all other parts of the system could not connect to the namenode because it was down, not because of IPC problems. On Jun 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Kilbride, James P. wrote: > Forgot to add on mapred-site.xml: > > > > > > > > > mapred.job.tracker > hdfs://10.28.208.118:54311 > The host and port that the MapReduce job tracker runs > at. If "local", then the jobs are run in-process as a single map and > reduce task. > true > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kilbride, James P. [mailto:James.Kilbride@gd-ais.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:10 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: IPC connections failing > > I've tried to move my system from pseudo distributed to full > distributed(with it being the first node in the full cluster I'll be > setting up) but the components don't seem to be talking to each other > and I find logs filled with ipc.Client connection failures. > > Here's the basic log info: > DataNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:42,824 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:49,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:50,343 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:51,354 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,641 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:54,733 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,737 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,824 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,827 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,833 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,844 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,849 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:05,852 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,855 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,858 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:08,883 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:09,970 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,973 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > > JobTracker: > 2010-06-15 12:42:52,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting JobTracker > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,350 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > Scheduler configured with (memSizeForMapSlotOnJT, > memSizeForReduceSlotOnJT, limitMaxMemForMapTasks, > limitMaxMemForReduceTasks) (-1, -1, -1, -1) > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,815 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DJobTracker, port=3D54311 > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,381 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port > returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is > -1. Opening the listener on 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: > listener.getLocalPort() returned 50030 > webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,400 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty > bound to port 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,402 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,802 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started > SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,805 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker up at: 54311 > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,807 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > JobTracker webserver: 50030 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,076 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,080 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:00,083 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,086 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,089 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,095 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:05,174 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,177 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,180 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,185 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: > problem cleaning system directory: null > java.net.ConnectException: Call to /10.28.208.118:54310 failed on > connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:106) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:207) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:170) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileS > ystem.java:82) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1390) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:196) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1665) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:183) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:175) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3702) > Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574) > at > org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.ja > va:206) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:860) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) > ... 16 more > > NameNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,714 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,922 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DNameNode, port=3D54310 > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,932 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: > centoshadoop/10.28.208.118:54310 > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,938 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull > 2010-06-15 12:42:38,941 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: > Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,140 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > fsOwner=3Dhadoop,users,hadoop > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > supergroup=3Dsupergroup > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,141 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,156 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: > Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,161 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered > FSNamesystemStatusMBean > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,381 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files =3D 28 > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under > construction =3D 0 > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,404 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 2780 > loaded in 0 seconds. > 2010-06-15 12:42:39,429 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: > java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "" > at > java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav > a:48) > at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:431) > at java.lang.Long.parseLong(Long.java:468) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.readLong(FSEditLog.java > :1273) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.j > ava:670) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java: > 992) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java: > 812) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSI > mage.java:364) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirecto > ry.java:87) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesys > tem.java:311) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem. > java:292) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java > :201) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279 > ) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode. > java:956) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) > > SecondaryNameNode: > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,227 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting SecondaryNameNode > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:53,442 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DSecondaryNameNode, > sessionId=3Dnull > 2010-06-15 12:42:55,651 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:56,659 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,662 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,665 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:42:59,668 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:00,671 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:01,674 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:02,677 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:03,679 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,682 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:04,685 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > 2010-06-15 12:43:06,691 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:07,694 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:08,697 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:09,700 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:10,703 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:11,706 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:12,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:13,712 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:14,714 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:15,717 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect to server: /10.28.208.118:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-06-15 12:43:15,718 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at > /10.28.208.118:54310 not available yet, Zzzzz... > > TaskTracker: > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,270 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting TaskTracker > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com/10.28.208.118 > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-06-15 12:42:57,854 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,328 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port > returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is > -1. Opening the listener on 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: > listener.getLocalPort() returned 50060 > webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,344 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty > bound to port 50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,345 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,852 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started > SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50060 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,860 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DTaskTracker, sessionId=3D > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,882 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DTaskTracker, port=3D50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,960 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > Responder: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,962 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > listener on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 2 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 0 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > TaskTracker up at: localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,964 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > Starting tracker > tracker_centoshadoop:localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:50758 > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 3 on 50758: starting > 2010-06-15 12:42:58,969 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 1 on 50758: starting > > The config files are: > core-site.xml: > > > > > > > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /hadoop-0.20.2/tmp/dir/hadoop-${user.name} > A base for the other temporary > directories. > true > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://10.28.208.118:54310 > The name of the default file system. A URI whose scheme > and auth > ority determine the filesystem implementation. The uri's scheme > determines the c > onfig property (fs.SCHEME.impl) name the FileSystem implementation > class. The ur > i's authority is used to determine the host, port, etc for a > filesystem > true > > > > > hadoop-env.sh > # Set Hadoop-specific environment variables here. > > # The only required environment variable is JAVA_HOME. All others are > # optional. When running a distributed configuration it is best to > # set JAVA_HOME in this file, so that it is correctly defined on > # remote nodes. > > # The java implementation to use. Required. > export JAVA_HOME=3D/usr/java/default > > # The hadoop home directory > export HADOOP_HOME=3D/hadoop-0.20.2 > > # Extra Java CLASSPATH elements. Optional. > export > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=3D/hbase-0.20.4/lib/zookeeper-3.2.2.jar:/habase-0.20.4/h= b > ase-0.20.4-test.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/hbase-0.20.4.jar:/hbase-0.20.4/conf > > # The maximum amount of heap to use, in MB. Default is 1000. > # export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D2000 > > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > export HADOOP_OPTS=3D-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=3Dtrue > > # Command specific options appended to HADOOP_OPTS when specified > export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS" > export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS" > export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS" > # export HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS=3D > # The following applies to multiple commands (fs, dfs, fsck, distcp etc) > # export HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS > > # Extra ssh options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"-o ConnectTimeout=3D1 -o > SendEnv=3DHADOOP_CONF_DIR" > > # Where log files are stored. $HADOOP_HOME/logs by default. > # export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs > > # File naming remote slave hosts. $HADOOP_HOME/conf/slaves by default. > # export HADOOP_SLAVES=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/conf/slaves > > # host:path where hadoop code should be rsync'd from. Unset by default. > # export HADOOP_MASTER=3Dmaster:/home/$USER/src/hadoop > > # Seconds to sleep between slave commands. Unset by default. This > # can be useful in large clusters, where, e.g., slave rsyncs can > # otherwise arrive faster than the master can service them. > # export HADOOP_SLAVE_SLEEP=3D0.1 > > # The directory where pid files are stored. /tmp by default. > # export HADOOP_PID_DIR=3D/var/hadoop/pids > > # A string representing this instance of hadoop. $USER by default. > # export HADOOP_IDENT_STRING=3D$USER > > # The scheduling priority for daemon processes. See 'man nice'. > # export HADOOP_NICENESS=3D10 > > hdfs-site.xml > > > > > > > > dfs.replication > 22 > Default block replication. The actual number of > replications can be specified when the file is created. Default is used > if not specified at creation time. > true > > > dfs.data.dir > /hadoop-0.20.2/hadoopDataStore/data > DFS Data Directory > true > > > > > masters: > 10.28.208.118 > > slaves: > 10.28.208.118 > > (And because I know it'll be asked) > hosts: > # Do not remove the following line, or various programs > # that require network functionality will fail. > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 > 10.28.208.118 centoshadoop centoshadoop.soa.gd-ais.com > > Why is this failing to stand up? I'd like to get this one node working > before I stand up any other data nodes.(Firewall, btw, is turned off) > > James Kilbride From general-return-1647-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 06:57:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70253 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 06:57:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 06:57:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 73938 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 06:57:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73345 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 06:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73331 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 06:57:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:57:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_FRT_STOCK1,T_FRT_STOCK2 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.186] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:57:35 +0000 Received: from smarthost.q2web.local (pd95b3aaa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.58.170]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lmel1-1OywWX3v75-00aAD6; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:57:15 +0200 Received: from amidalasrv.q2web.local (amidalasrv.q2web.local [192.168.0.2]) by smarthost.q2web.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9C6F4E8 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:33:01 +0200 (CEST) x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: AW: HDFS file append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:57:11 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HDFS file append Thread-Index: AcsMq7FsvnETETDHTs2tISQPAxC1SwAdT8rQ References: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_St=F6cker?= To: X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18rNi1X51omnjl1w31ay/l10G64M6J648x9SZN lS/spebs2kMRFbXeGs40J+7MqQ15tzdc4OCvzmCkUUj3TL/Qyp tcXFD7nbfuw6GlPr2DQHRPewcjpJ9aJ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org O.k., thanks for the information & the suggestions! Jan -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com]=20 Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juni 2010 18:55 An: general@hadoop.apache.org Betreff: Re: HDFS file append On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dhruba Borthakur = wrote: > You can start downloading and using the code form the = hadoop-0.20-append. > > Though it's still missing some patches, so I'd recommend SVN checkouts = and watching the branch :) -Todd > thanks, > dhruba > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Todd Lipcon = wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Jan St=F6cker = > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > in the hdfs-default.xml, I found the warning that the property > > > > > > "dfs.support.append" is false by default, because of the "append > > > > > > code" containing bugs. > > > > > > For our test case (which is not very complicated), I tried it out > > > > > > nevertheless (in a C program using libhdfs), and I did not > > > > > > encounter any problems yet. The only thing I noticed is that the > > > > > > modification date of the file to which I append is not changed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Could someone indicate which other bugs may occur? And in > > > > > > which cases? Because the append could be quite useful for me, > > > > > > and I would like to know the risk. > > > > > > > Mostly in failure handling cases, but not entirely. The result is = usually > > truncated files, sometimes truncated as if your append didn't = happen, > > sometimes the entire last block going missing. Look for the = 0.20-append > fix > > version on JIRA for a more significantly list. > > > > I'd recommend waiting a couple weeks and using the = hadoop-0.20-append > > branch > > which will contain fixes for many of these bugs. > > > > -Todd > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-1648-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 17:05:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71532 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 12:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 12:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 54516 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 12:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54000 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 12:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53990 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 12:10:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:10:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of karan_jindal@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:10:30 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1277295005.80572@9fjgOk50klZ+5xQFbQScFg Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5GCA5IV001366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:40:05 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id o5GCA5Sp001349; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:40:05 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to karan_jindal@localhost using -f Received: from 125.16.17.151 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user karan_jindal) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:40:05 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <46220.125.16.17.151.1276690205.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:40:05 +0530 (IST) Subject: How many records will be passed to a map function?? From: "Karan Jindal" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5GCA5IV001366 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: karan_jindal@students.iiit.ac.in X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5, No Hi all, Given a scenario in which a input file contains total 1000 records (record in a line) of total size 12k and I set number of map tasks to 2. How many records will be passed to each map task? Is it the equal distribution? InputFormat = Text Block size = default block of hdfs Hoping for a reply.. Regards Karan -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-1649-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 17:15:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6456 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 15:29:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 15:29:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 25963 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 15:29:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25902 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 15:29:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25894 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 15:29:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:29:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:29:29 +0000 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so5771631gwb.35 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CNlk4BotftuUystZUkl7D6xNWqjydvWNuSrWQ7b9OBY=; b=cjd5Y3pdUQXoTp+fcxLgphJuSMR4o9tHxSMVZmjPgtg/tDm4vO/lOFoRcj2uRAovHm 4Z1SkHPaol+oiWyRyWmRdGgdLHkv7yfS9ynRMotz0DRhrJrDFHO0LZKs3NFj7+8hP5sk WtVgbNZZLIfJ+TDyTG82VDc2Bo6uc5p0OI+6Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k2nWtgNdzq1G9RXqOa/Ovecaw+kCXT12/DATbUObMm+TOtjXujlTus5EfdC2DIXbZd k6W25kjMKAqzr4vlijcZCq+9Co1wkslDuQe00Vq/Gs8tFiZjyHqYCmeBtvC0v7XqT9pQ RiIxb0y8MHu2F2v81YOVHoXUW1bAFsUCFk/es= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.10.8 with SMTP id n8mr7471363ani.30.1276702148605; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.46.17 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:29:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago area Hadoop User Group Meeting - June 22nd From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450293580d7add0489276249 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0050450293580d7add0489276249 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The next meeting of the Chicago area Hadoop User Group will be help on Tuesday June 22nd from 6:00-8:00PM. The meeting will be held at Orbitz Worldwide headquarters located in the Citigroup building at 500 West Madison in downtown Chicago. The agenda will include a talk on Hadoop and Hive usage at Orbitz, and an introduction to Sector/Sphere, a high performance DFS and parallel processing framework. Full details and RSVP here: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoop-User-Group-CHUG/ Thanks, and hope to see you there! Jonathan --0050450293580d7add0489276249-- From general-return-1650-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 17:27:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58803 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 17:27:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 17:27:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 44039 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 16:59:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43575 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 16:59:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43469 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 16:59:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:59:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:59:28 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5GGwiBM027895 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:58:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=XX7FH1g58TdJutE8PLliHBR7P6l84c8IwZ38gAlAsIYMxhB2LTh7dWdtiiJJTX5I Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:58:44 -0700 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:58:05 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:58:05 -0700 Subject: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Thread-Index: AcsNdRZ/YckvT2pHkE+yp3YT7q35yA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2010 16:58:44.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E41CCB0:01CB0D75] Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. The proposal is posted at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal Thanks Regards, Eric From general-return-1651-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 17:36:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64828 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 17:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 17:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 5230 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5156 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5148 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 17:36:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:36:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:36:18 +0000 Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Wc2s1e00317UAYkAEhbxFM; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:35:57 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Whbp1e0052SbwD58Zhbrwt; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:35:55 +0000 Message-Id: <46916273-1545-4D94-AC8F-93E97EC643B6@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:35:49 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache > incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal Since the goal of Chukwa's incubation is to make it a TLP, the sponsor needs to be the board instead of Hadoop. In the background and source submission plan you should mention that it is currently a subproject of Hadoop. Other than that, it looks good. -- Owen From general-return-1652-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 17:57:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76355 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 17:57:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 17:57:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 33304 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33237 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 17:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33229 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 17:57:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:57:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.24] (HELO qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:57:26 +0000 Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Wdd51e0021bwxycA2hx57m; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:57:05 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Whww1e0052SbwD58ehwyFA; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:57:02 +0000 Message-Id: <9BF08853-8D72-4A4B-95EA-36BAC20BE2BE@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Sanjay Radia joins the Hadoop PMC Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:56:56 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hadoop PMC has voted to add Sanjay Radia to itself. Congratulations, Sanjay! Thanks for all of the hard work on Hadoop. -- Owen From general-return-1653-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 18:20:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87760 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 18:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 18:20:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 72158 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 18:20:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72096 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 18:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72088 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 18:20:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:20:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-175.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:20:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 87687 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 18:20:13 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.205]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:20:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4C1915DC.9000506@apache.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:20:12 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Owen O'Malley Subject: Re: Sanjay Radia joins the Hadoop PMC References: <9BF08853-8D72-4A4B-95EA-36BAC20BE2BE@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <9BF08853-8D72-4A4B-95EA-36BAC20BE2BE@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Congratulations Sanjay! Patrick On 06/16/2010 10:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The Hadoop PMC has voted to add Sanjay Radia to itself. Congratulations, > Sanjay! Thanks for all of the hard work on Hadoop. > > -- Owen From general-return-1654-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 18:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95969 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 18:27:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 18:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 86194 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 18:27:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85786 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 18:27:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85773 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 18:27:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:27:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of CGartin@taos.com designates 12.238.9.132 as permitted sender) Received: from [12.238.9.132] (HELO relay.taos.com) (12.238.9.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:27:36 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,427,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="27499947" Received: from unknown (HELO mantaray.taos.local) ([172.20.100.18]) by relay.taos.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2010 11:27:34 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Sanjay Radia joins the Hadoop PMC Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:28:11 -0700 Message-ID: <853C65D5E3860D40BB05F5C627C796EE01A83420@mantaray.taos.local> In-Reply-To: <4C1915DC.9000506@apache.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Sanjay Radia joins the Hadoop PMC Thread-Index: AcsNgMDBWplPi1NCSnON6xJrnCG6hAAANc7g References: <9BF08853-8D72-4A4B-95EA-36BAC20BE2BE@apache.org> <4C1915DC.9000506@apache.org> From: "Courtney Gartin" To: Cc: "Owen O'Malley" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations Sanjay!!! Courtney -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:phunt@apache.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:20 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Owen O'Malley Subject: Re: Sanjay Radia joins the Hadoop PMC Congratulations Sanjay! Patrick On 06/16/2010 10:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The Hadoop PMC has voted to add Sanjay Radia to itself. Congratulations, > Sanjay! Thanks for all of the hard work on Hadoop. > > -- Owen From general-return-1655-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 19:39:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34556 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 19:39:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 19:39:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 99823 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 19:39:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99759 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 19:39:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99751 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 19:39:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:39:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [137.100.120.43] (HELO mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com) (137.100.120.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:39:43 +0000 Received: from ([160.207.224.15]) by mnbm01-relay1.mnb.gd-ais.com with SMTP id 5202712.272194510; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:34:57 -0500 Received: from MAPF01-MAIL01.ad.gd-ais.com ([166.16.220.104]) by mnbm01-fes01.ad.gd-ais.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:34:57 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D8A.FFCDF70A" x-cr-hashedpuzzle: cCE= Apj5 BA4z BXpu BYqw BfIP EP3V GBlL GRxJ HnSn HoM8 H7aA KXN9 Kx1B K7YT LNRM;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{BBDEA61D-7330-4029-B108-D303CD1B8FE1};agBhAG0AZQBzAC4AawBpAGwAYgByAGkAZABlAEAAZwBkAC0AYQBpAHMALgBjAG8AbQA=;Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:34:54 GMT;SABhAGQAbwBvAHAAIABpAG4AIABXAGUAYgAgAGEAcABwAGwAaQBjAGEAdABpAG8AbgBzAA== x-cr-puzzleid: {BBDEA61D-7330-4029-B108-D303CD1B8FE1} Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Hadoop in Web applications Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:34:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop in Web applications Thread-Index: AcsNiv7nHluf/7qmRsCjw9taX/TI/w== From: "Kilbride, James P." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2010 19:34:57.0056 (UTC) FILETIME=[00859200:01CB0D8B] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D8A.FFCDF70A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, What's the preferred way to use hadoop within java code running as a web service in something like tomcat? Would you edit the tomcat configuration to have access to the hadoop directory? Or simply include the hadoop jar and have the web service set some configuration somehow before calling submit(assuming the webservice implements the Tool interface)? James Kilbride ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB0D8A.FFCDF70A-- From general-return-1656-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 16 19:42:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35757 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 19:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 19:42:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5049 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 19:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4993 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 19:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4985 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 19:42:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:42:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:42:09 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5GJeXUx097765 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:40:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=G97zrBLaOTzIUAAzaOsaD2AKQRgl2VfJ9ZEpzCxoNYyUeYyP959fEsfMiEncbWWD Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:40:33 -0700 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:40:22 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:40:22 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Eric Yang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Thread-Index: AcsNi8I01RgleKehAEOydxb5Q+cRRQ== In-Reply-To: <46916273-1545-4D94-AC8F-93E97EC643B6@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2010 19:40:33.0307 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8F166B0:01CB0D8B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have updated the proposal per Owen's request. I put Incubator in Sponsoring Entity like other proposals. Regards, Eric On 6/16/10 10:35 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache >> incubator. >> >> The proposal is posted at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Since the goal of Chukwa's incubation is to make it a TLP, the sponsor > needs to be the board instead of Hadoop. In the background and source > submission plan you should mention that it is currently a subproject > of Hadoop. Other than that, it looks good. > > -- Owen From general-return-1658-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 17 12:01:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18084 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2010 12:01:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Jun 2010 12:01:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 60884 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 10:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60347 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 10:14:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60334 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2010 10:14:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:14:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:14:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AA91BA4DB for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:54 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VhNyKLbeNadj for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F911BA313 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:53 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1277374421.43511@qGuMqkM4p/JA3Dh1QHeisg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o5HADe9r004039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C19F556.2060207@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:13:42 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop in Web applications References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5HADe9r004039 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kilbride, James P. wrote: > All, > > What's the preferred way to use hadoop within java code running as a web > service in something like tomcat? Would you edit the tomcat > configuration to have access to the hadoop directory? Or simply include > the hadoop jar and have the web service set some configuration somehow > before calling submit(assuming the webservice implements the Tool > interface)? 1. run hadoop services outside of the web server process, 2. bring up the Hadoop client libraries passing in a jobconf that binds to the filesystem/JT in the cluster 3. talk to the things remotely as you desire there's no need to do the tool interface, just talk using the DfsClient and Filesystem client APIs. e.g to submit work, call JobClient.submitJob(jobConf) on a client you've created, to work with a dfs given its URI and a conf file: FileSystem dfs = FileSystem.newInstance(uri, conf); dfs.initialize(uri, conf); From general-return-1659-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 17 12:47:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94637 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2010 12:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Jun 2010 12:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 53773 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 12:47:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53289 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 12:47:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53280 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2010 12:47:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:47:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1508.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:47:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 94407 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2010 12:47:28 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:47:28 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so3821885iwn.35 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.0.68 with SMTP id 4mr3487015icb.98.1276769020753; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.144.11 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:03:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 -C On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Thanks > > Regards, > Eric > > From general-return-1657-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 17 12:59:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7374 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2010 12:59:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Jun 2010 12:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 76540 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 05:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76200 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2010 05:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76189 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2010 05:52:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:52:36 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5H5pXO2064761 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:51:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=pgNY17C8RaB38fjiBxGAnnc4iKerxtWMwqsDondGTke9SivSPICHcJASULDx1/Aw Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:21:33 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:21:06 +0530 Subject: Re: Hadoop in Web applications Thread-Topic: Hadoop in Web applications Thread-Index: AcsNiv7nHluf/7qmRsCjw9taX/TI/wAVhTRM Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C83FB5A239587svenkatyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C83FB5A239587svenkatyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Latter should work well. Venkatesh On 6/17/10 1:04 AM, "Kilbride, James P." wrote: All, What's the preferred way to use hadoop within java code running as a web service in something like tomcat? Would you edit the tomcat configuration to have access to the hadoop directory? Or simply include the hadoop jar and have the web service set some configuration somehow before calling submit(assuming the webservice implements the Tool interface)? James Kilbride --_000_C83FB5A239587svenkatyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1660-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 11:35:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83440 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 11:35:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 11:35:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 81297 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 11:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80367 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 11:35:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80351 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 11:35:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:35:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:35:46 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so981983wyb.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:35:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fMqbQ4/Zh94iQDCDPZOzKbsJKxWJgfe8LQQBeA/Mf2k=; b=Nf67e9G7z309cWJKYv3QNHam7rexl/nYLpSSTpaM+J9Mfoc4z1BJwH7e3LWYx2YEAX jk56RadvBNU4hlmuXh8NbrDDKVihdAq3SQBrzRjeuFXD4Jcb7ounyi6+xZZNL4N0XuEU dHodCQ+jNhHEy+2pyhp8g6MjGD5k5z2i7aN9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=We4gf8XS1Ses9n2BfqhZDgBthxeZrie2E1whYGJ/AY0SfQpKmevvyPuvD/LUtf+c2R 5XO3CgSd0/aSzR8oS/fz6UPdB8xWXbNXMkLGehMMm9+Fnp00Ac+3jSDAxW2fi0CUW98X GxRQcSP4yNzJl0wyXNKmZyuNh0/FrvL9HQua0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.6 with SMTP id z6mr686967wee.79.1276860925356; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.156.6 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:35:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46916273-1545-4D94-AC8F-93E97EC643B6@apache.org> References: <46916273-1545-4D94-AC8F-93E97EC643B6@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:35, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache >> incubator. >> >> The proposal is posted at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Since the goal of Chukwa's incubation is to make it a TLP, the sponsor needs > to be the board instead of Hadoop. Although the incubation docs say so, this has rarely - if ever - been executed. None of the current projects has the board as a sponsor, although most of them can be expected to become TLPs. I think, Hadoop should be the sponsor. This would be in line with previous incubations. But in the end, what's important are the mentors. Bernd From general-return-1661-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 17:45:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38419 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 17:45:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 17:45:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 77198 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 17:45:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77102 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 17:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77094 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 17:45:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:45:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.195] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c149.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.149]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5IHhKBw032027 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=ZxlZRGckauzUcPM85mtzlxje9Kp2og9JZnZJvYB0m5E78ZWAQ3YggmJ1rGw9E9Hv Message-Id: <7CF105CA-6D75-472B-A0F3-63D66513E575@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:43:20 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Alan. On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache > incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Thanks > > Regards, > Eric > From general-return-1662-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 17:52:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40207 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 17:52:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 17:52:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 93838 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 17:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93788 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 17:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93768 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 17:52:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:52:42 +0000 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XTuj1e0080cZkys51VsNom; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:52:23 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id XVsD1e0032SbwD53WVsFGQ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:52:20 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:52:11 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache > incubator. +1 From general-return-1663-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 18:01:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41854 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 18:01:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 18:01:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 99537 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 18:01:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99489 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 18:01:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99481 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 18:01:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:00:59 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5IHwY8w029914 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:58:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=hAd+Zm7cjBUMbJxQg6gsXBjfFEfzFUHN5AI7QtKtSaD43LTo1nvmemo3+gPLJMyZ Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:58:34 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 Arun On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache > incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Thanks > > Regards, > Eric > From general-return-1664-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 20:38:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91612 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 20:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 20:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 61035 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 20:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60976 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 20:38:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60968 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 20:38:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:38:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:38:28 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5IKbQNE052662 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:37:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=H4gvmfwtckagyjWD1/fr9z5AX8C/sIA/1w1FhTWbdk5TS7Tvwe/nKlcXjbZ5YHHb Received: from SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.89]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:37:26 -0700 Received: from 172.21.148.167 ([172.21.148.167]) by SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.103]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:37:25 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:37:25 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Amir Youssefi To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Thread-Index: AcsPJg9LALb3jC8aDkGo8wXGbjhsJQ== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2010 20:37:26.0234 (UTC) FILETIME=[10083BA0:01CB0F26] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Amir > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache >> incubator. From general-return-1665-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 20:49:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93129 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 20:49:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 20:49:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 75226 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 20:49:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75179 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 20:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75171 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 20:49:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:49:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:48:56 +0000 Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so677150bwz.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:48:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.85.70 with SMTP id n6mr1235910bkl.189.1276894115461; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.52.70 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:48:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:48:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Thanks > > Regards, > Eric > > From general-return-1666-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 21:42:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6627 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 21:42:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 21:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 22531 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 21:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22452 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 21:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22444 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 21:42:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:42:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:42:48 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5ILg5YK006360 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:42:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=uGiQwsHVEutiYpIyT3yf5pBBzFaFt4ypICegngRkPL1Ys04AtRLtUXGg0EfmOdEn Received: from SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.89]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:42:05 -0700 Received: from 10.72.105.112 ([10.72.105.112]) by SNV-EXVS10.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.103]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:42:04 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:42:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Amir Youssefi To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator Thread-Index: AcsPLxbDESfQIfHnoEezdIyYlDSjKw== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2010 21:42:05.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[185B5770:01CB0F2F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Amir > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache >> incubator. >> >> The proposal is posted at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal >> >> Thanks >> >> Regards, >> Eric >> > From general-return-1667-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 21:45:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6940 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 21:45:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 21:45:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 23797 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 21:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23721 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 21:45:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23713 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 21:45:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:45:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of babogorilla@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:45:21 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so1709948ywh.2 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=IzU1lydZjUvTip0uKp2IdGGy4WCFwymF6A9XOqRFifc=; b=OD72HuaMcwcEUZUXHRs3arOTNK5o4GTkPHzQ5l1lfey7uMBKnPYetGZDMpR6LWENXN NXhxcxG3/1Ix2N3qNfxzJA1TyXOkmr4Q8Q1cWzEtMfh4igkU1hpLotBR1PB62Vxg2dwH 52am3WDM8yyvfyT77mRDmh0RilDkh7qSvBJYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=pykD2MRwndQI4mZIFUg1OW3dqB+SbNzzF4PyCylt4zH2Mi20eQ0BMwiPk+CVHU6sRQ 2EFLjRbz2fsAc1FEeIYkOaUeykipSkS4DZEXNkTaUvoJfFp7148yfjdgcrfADLGMtqDu 03LgmxhEjuwegdKDAXKw5yEen0aeCfB1PabBU= Received: by 10.220.124.38 with SMTP id s38mr671429vcr.161.1276897500196; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:45:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: babogorilla@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.86.129 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:44:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tim Sanchez Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:44:40 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Enx7BL71J36vkyOntVhUVPQLzuo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34455e9f02b048954ddc5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636d34455e9f02b048954ddc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Amir Youssefi wrote: > +1 > > Amir > > > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > > > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache > >> incubator. > >> > >> The proposal is posted at: > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Regards, > >> Eric > >> > > > > --001636d34455e9f02b048954ddc5-- From general-return-1668-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 22:49:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22045 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 22:49:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76156 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75863 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72035 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 21:49:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) From: Steve Wooledge To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "hive-user@hadoop.apache.org" , hbase-user Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:49:24 -0700 Subject: Hadoop Summit Unconference: BigDataCamp - June 28th Thread-Topic: Hadoop Summit Unconference: BigDataCamp - June 28th Thread-Index: AcrxX5vzBTWhLG+KR4ip/RciMdDUXgcPTd4g Message-ID: <0B7A7A7AB36FC54D88B1B312F8209FEDFFB17591@pandora> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hadoop Fans, BigDataCamp is a free event the evening before Hadoop Summit. Great chance = to network and grab some food/drinks: www.bigdatacamp.org=20 It is an unconference for users of Hadoop and related technologies to excha= nge ideas in a loosely distributed format. Led by CloudCamp's Dave Nielsen,= attendees are encouraged to share thoughts in open discussions with pre-de= fined and majority-vote topics, including best practices in application dev= elopment and advanced analytics. The pre-defined topics will be presented = in a form of a workshop with free AWS credits for Amazon Elastic MapReduce. Data engineers, enterprise architects, developers, analysts, data mining an= d business intelligence professionals are encouraged to attend and mix with= other members of the community. Hope to see you there. Cheers, Steve Wooledge Aster Data www.asterdata.com=20 From general-return-1669-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 22:49:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22632 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 22:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 77840 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77760 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 22:49:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27990 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2010 04:39:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nige.daley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=bShBUN9oPzmL63JxmGwahaZKLQ0GyCzQN7tlCtBlZDU=; b=f2FaDoVCfdTYHEuxn/cDwHlogS7a0ePWdgofzYaKdQkMeRZnfgNpGj0mrLJs4tcypW ZyG7r4mpWApWRnoDC3FCSgc+1w1oMWBUZSN0o6K6N8uv8Rh8lQP5uGwrfp54IoMluMlj X2f3R59mb4++1cNIXDak0eBTYdoyFfg+708tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=N8/koMa70R2hLGKnlU0HWUhFMlHy/Dx3rGWWxVXkBd7vvxeRbzpx9NAWBzl2qp3QjD 37MTYwyU+cE1lZlb72hIB54Sgf1i6MCst6sQmvw61Kfxi6F+BaMUcjD67/KH+oXOSwWq pPOODeNuOiQajDLW4wG0AQKfJaQ2rQNCwEV5A= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Nigel Daley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:38:57 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. > > The proposal is posted at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Thanks > > Regards, > Eric > From general-return-1670-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 18 23:28:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34448 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2010 23:28:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2010 23:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7543 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 23:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7486 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2010 23:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7478 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2010 23:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:28:04 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so833412wwc.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:27:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.161.9 with SMTP id v9mr1346444wek.20.1276903663441; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.20 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:27:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46220.125.16.17.151.1276690205.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> References: <46220.125.16.17.151.1276690205.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:27:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How many records will be passed to a map function?? From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Karan: In general, you should let Hadoop pick the number of mappers to use. In the case of only 1000 records @ 12k, performance will be better with a single mapper for IO bound jobs. When you force the number of map tasks, Hadoop will do the following: (Assuming FileInputFormat#getSplits(conf, numSplits) gets called) totalSize is sum size of all input files in bytes goalSize is totalSize / numSplits minSplitSize is conf value mapred.min.split.size (default 1) For each input file: length =3D file.size() while isSplitable(file) and length !=3D 0 fileBlockSize is the block size of the file minOfGoalBlock is min(goalSize, fileBlockSize) realSplitSize is max(minSplitSize, minOfGoalBlock) length is length minus realSplitSize (give or take) Note that it's actually more confusing than this, but this is the general idea. Let's plug in some numbers: 1 file totalSize =3D 12k file size blockSize =3D 64MB block numSplits =3D 2 goalSize =3D 6k (12k / 2) minSplitSize =3D 1 (for FileInputFormat) minOfGoalBlock =3D 6k (6k < 64MB) realSplitSize =3D 6k (6k > 1) We end up with 2 splits, 6k each. RecordReaders then parse this into record= s. Note that this applies to the old APIs. The newer APIs work slightly different but I think the result is equivalent. (If anyone wants to double check my summation, I welcome it. This is some hairy code and these questions frequently come up.) Hope this helps. On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Karan Jindal wrote: > > Hi all, > > Given a scenario in which a input file contains total 1000 records (recor= d > in a line) of total size 12k and I set number of map tasks to 2. > How many records will be passed to each map task? Is it the equal > distribution? > > InputFormat =3D Text > Block size =A0=3D default block of hdfs > > Hoping for a reply.. > > Regards > Karan > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1671-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 19 00:14:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46982 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2010 00:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Jun 2010 00:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 32316 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2010 00:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32262 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2010 00:14:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32252 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2010 00:14:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:14:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:14:12 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so231303vws.35 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.89.166 with SMTP id e38mr675509vcm.247.1276906431129; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.18.15 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <46220.125.16.17.151.1276690205.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:13:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How many records will be passed to a map function?? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64766043d2a37048956f2d6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64766043d2a37048956f2d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Short answer: FileInputFormat & friends generate splits based on byte ranges. Assuming your records are all equally sized, you'll get half your records in each mapper. If your records have many different sizes represented, then your mileage may vary. - Aaron On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > Karan: > > In general, you should let Hadoop pick the number of mappers to use. > In the case of only 1000 records @ 12k, performance will be better > with a single mapper for IO bound jobs. When you force the number of > map tasks, Hadoop will do the following: > > (Assuming FileInputFormat#getSplits(conf, numSplits) gets called) > > totalSize is sum size of all input files in bytes > goalSize is totalSize / numSplits > minSplitSize is conf value mapred.min.split.size (default 1) > > For each input file: > length = file.size() > while isSplitable(file) and length != 0 > fileBlockSize is the block size of the file > minOfGoalBlock is min(goalSize, fileBlockSize) > realSplitSize is max(minSplitSize, minOfGoalBlock) > > length is length minus realSplitSize (give or take) > > Note that it's actually more confusing than this, but this is the > general idea. Let's plug in some numbers: > > 1 file > totalSize = 12k file size > blockSize = 64MB block > numSplits = 2 > goalSize = 6k (12k / 2) > minSplitSize = 1 (for FileInputFormat) > > minOfGoalBlock = 6k (6k < 64MB) > realSplitSize = 6k (6k > 1) > > We end up with 2 splits, 6k each. RecordReaders then parse this into > records. > > Note that this applies to the old APIs. The newer APIs work slightly > different but I think the result is equivalent. > > (If anyone wants to double check my summation, I welcome it. This is > some hairy code and these questions frequently come up.) > > Hope this helps. > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Karan Jindal > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Given a scenario in which a input file contains total 1000 records > (record > > in a line) of total size 12k and I set number of map tasks to 2. > > How many records will be passed to each map task? Is it the equal > > distribution? > > > > InputFormat = Text > > Block size = default block of hdfs > > > > Hoping for a reply.. > > > > Regards > > Karan > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > --0016e64766043d2a37048956f2d6-- From general-return-1672-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 21 09:30:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95872 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 09:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 09:30:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5624 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 09:30:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4763 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 09:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4749 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2010 09:30:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:30:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:30:45 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so3164044wyb.35 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ODOCGwghsuPFEc8qKgR8NOWwZhpb6p3o9baehV1osrs=; b=xj8MUAKI5m/q+y6hWs+FyK4a9wAjF1ipSgb1hwc4SmAgA0KSCShMhMifu9uD3GYVQF tcdBJaXPFrfvh0bbsL6UiDEaQJmQy/ebRL9cS3OK2hXcJrnm0LA4yIo+8Q0FkXbiNr1C iNLX1GtoPrc8Lu191BJRvQEpYC23MxhjeqnJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u6g5N0nJhAp+pxAv446sYLkbbbhydhqcEXfG7gKRKAmYJ+ixzTEk0WC7QSCEJMLUjU 0jKd8sc0Lb2nK2WEt7H4DQGwzD5Rte0qj/wpOdOWNesDXnFIX/wvkndn2zm6mDCxxjRH 5ySofrv/cIP57FyP/6oDSKxfEBu0pOSqQ0Dyg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.80 with SMTP id a58mr2494297wem.35.1277112623386; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.156.6 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:30:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Another mentor [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator] From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, anyone mind if I'd add myself as a mentor? Bernd On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 06:38, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1 > > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. >> >> The proposal is posted at: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal >> >> Thanks >> >> Regards, >> Eric >> > > From general-return-1673-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 21 16:18:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8874 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 16:18:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 16:18:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 55533 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 16:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55282 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2010 16:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55274 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2010 16:18:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.80] (HELO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:17:58 +0000 Received: from omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YbxY1e00516AWCUA8gHcG9; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:17:37 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YgHH1e0052SbwD58SgHVPG; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:17:34 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Another mentor [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator] Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:17:24 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Hi, > > anyone mind if I'd add myself as a mentor? That would be great. -- Owen From general-return-1674-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 23 16:06:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86743 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 16:06:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39045 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38671 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6948 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2010 15:50:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 846738.63928.bm@omp301.mail.re3.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1277308180; bh=4PSz+URDb/GzQePUmdFr0fScZHoi1xAiRcnigVP7ZaI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QAALIkJrE8Sj5HyX5cCznYAVKdSOAcRjK03VmmrLz0XqI7+4u1DWfbZdiMr95ZSV5+PZSImo5YK9cQad82UNQULr9BKhAMCERACuDNJrSYcIFoH/6eV9ORa4F31s/JZMzhqzw/U/eCPCdOufX9q8krSD9hj766NkjqfALVKW4y0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vV4LAI59+mPC8qVckY1eq2xkkg9za1YsCWDsNlyYl1StWCftmpuvTt/ubFKUhK7rsK2QyJPdJU8j2bBGIVzJIRnw2DEmTbD+durSBQizUbR+jWbskPV1zcGUbLGWPtw3xLqSZXi3AAlX6Ja1i8mqCIJLr5Eq0Nv//uXpurrAIp0=; Message-ID: <217002.5465.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Oxz_VcMVM1nwCgFLBeQR59XREtikzlMKIqOA.pKrdXbisDP .OnLfHWMZGWplpKRhCw1XBic1S24aEagP6HyT4cc2T6bjk7MQV_Vrlrnk_QA ZL4dw7ijp67AzeGxeKIrI6_1vvx1YiOqoR5zfMTuJkSeT0y1o9r1.4QHclc1 6jp5BAX5lVS8HipVLC8iX.5CNNSaIiEcapbBGob5o9RbMLyCWdnvG_rtSueO RQCLMlgYXIjjqQfrlgvESeZolKOfW11Dk5QKHOyNbBXN53q5o8US.P09asAO WfArL6gcpC06EbJw2T83kcp8WG.Qdq.6mdxCrk7RQS7zPmhLFDlzqVotg33r nVdaey6Kv0HH3fFsvwKuhfI4quO8YSP5ew0n8qZLfClbiq6EIUQ-- X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 References: <20100623153137.16141.23534@eos.apache.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: New attachment added to page download on Hadoop Wiki To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20100623153137.16141.23534@eos.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are getting more spams in the hadoop wiki page. How should we deal with it? Nicholas Sze ----- Original Message ---- > From: Apache Wiki > To: Apache Wiki > Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 8:31:37 AM > Subject: New attachment added to page download on Hadoop Wiki > > Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "download" for change > notification. An attachment has been added to that page by Eric Pridz. Following > detailed information is available: Attachment name: > download-mtv-movie-awards-2010 Attachment size: 3746 Attachment link: > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/download?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=download-mtv-movie-awards-2010 Page > link: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/download From general-return-1675-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 23 16:06:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86934 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 16:06:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 40887 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40820 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66062 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2010 12:34:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shujamughal@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6KpLHn0qcXABYf6K5taG5UMUPp+62cHSSZokHw0RUqE=; b=NAfU+I1ycOfrPmOQMYYAmM5mOZWz5sAoq32H2izeaxsjIl6jAaFY5vd/nqf8T5ppxA geuaO42lH1uhIfrVh1EuJcLFgUab3JBohCzhNGub3IRDC/ZBR8HyLpZdoIfSEbV/X1pR Uk26iZfwM3J4/AXfygItfecCQSbhSYMeP4S+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=o60n14Id0wWamqIa1jbmrhnCJxuYIAfRsaMMkMAQu7+uFanwFXTqyJWeDTI44o4voh DQVLHoVGzrjcxxFgpcVcXT8CrcMZRq2PI5Xd3wyJft/sWXQ3VPTeMfH4lY798JhsoFwB XpQbkKnlXJNu/dzUzorOhM5J+5dj5TgXdreDw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:34:27 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Configure Groovy for map/reduce jobs in hadoop From: Shuja Rehman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32f9662691804899da417 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd32f9662691804899da417 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi I have write a map/reduce job in groovy and run the job using hadoop streaming as follow. hadoop jar /usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.2+228-streaming.jar \ -inputformat StreamInputFormat \ -inputreader "StreamXmlRecordReader,begin=,end=" \ -input /user/root/telecom/ \ -jobconf mapred.map.tasks=1 \ -output q5 \ -mapper /home/ftpuser1/Nodemapper2.groovy \ -jobconf mapred.reduce.tasks=0 \ -file /home/ftpuser1/Nodemapper2.groovy The problem is that the output files has 0 byte size. I have checked the log file. The log file contains the following error. */usr/bin/env: groovy: No such file or directory* The groovy is installed on the system and i verify it by running with help of following command. *cat 1.xml | /root/Nodemapper2.groovy * This command runs fine and shows the output. The Mapper has the following line in the start. *#!/usr/bin/env groovy* Can anybody tell is there any special configurations required to run groovy map/reduce jobs with hadoop? -- Regards Shuja-ur-Rehman Baig _________________________________ MS CS - School of Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) Sector U, DHA, Lahore, 54792, Pakistan Cell: +92 3214207445 --000e0cd32f9662691804899da417-- From general-return-1676-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 23 16:31:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95661 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 16:30:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 16:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 87416 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:30:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87369 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 16:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87361 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2010 16:30:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:30:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.149] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:30:47 +0000 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o5NGJebG005514 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:19:40 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o5NGUCKW025468 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:30:17 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o5NGU8Ro005621 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:30:09 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o5NGU86v005534 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:30:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: The IBM Distribution of Apache Hadoop now available X-KeepSent: F68C4536:C7F1E4B5-8625774B:00558405; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:30:07 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 06/23/2010 10:30:08, Serialize complete at 06/23/2010 10:30:08 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005AA5CD8625774B_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 005AA5CD8625774B_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgRm9sa3MNCg0K4oCo4oCoSUJNIGhhcyBtYWRlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhIHByZXZpZXcgdmVyc2lv biBvZiB0aGUgSUJNIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZiANCkFwYWNoZSBIYWRvb3AuIFlvdSBjYW4gYWNj ZXNzIGl0IGhlcmUgLSANCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYWxwaGF3b3Jrcy5pYm0uY29tL3RlY2gvaWRhaC8g LiBUaGlzIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBjb250YWlucyANCkFwYWNoZSBIYWRvb3AgMC4yMC4yLCBhIDMy LWJpdCBMaW51eCB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIHRoZSBJQk0gU0RLIGZvciBKYXZhIDYgU1IgDQo4LCBhbmQg YW4gZWFzeSB0byB1c2Ugd2ViIGJhc2VkIHdpemFyZCBmb3IgdGhlIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiBhbmQg DQpjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIG9mIEhhZG9vcC7igKjigKgNCg0KVGhlIGJlc3QgcGxhY2UgZm9yIHF1 ZXN0aW9ucyBvbiB0aGlzIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBhcmUgdGhlIHRocmVhZHMgdW5kZXIgDQp0aGUg Zm9ydW0gdGFiLCBhY2Nlc3NpYmxlIGZyb20gdGhlIGxpbmsgcHJvdmlkZWQgYWJvdmUuIFdlJ2xs IGFsc28gYmUgYXQgDQp0aGUgSGFkb29wIFN1bW1pdC7igKjigKgNCg0KUmVnYXJkcw0K4oCoU3Rl dmUgV2F0dA0KDQoNCg== --=_alternative 005AA5CD8625774B_=-- From general-return-1677-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 24 20:10:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43828 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2010 20:10:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Jun 2010 20:10:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 94020 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 20:10:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93501 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 20:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93483 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2010 20:10:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:10:37 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so7271949gyf.35 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Xk6jofMRskNfUGhgwcuEtqR0hrA93R93s/PhGcZWmGA=; b=RGIMt7Tjsj67T8fk2c8CBRACWG19+Hvo6tl9OLjbN3NbvIDOubRl8pmG7xs3NfIkYz vQFv6KTdLE0jhP1cOHsO0miUQL6pgX0WsUSQJt1l8JUXxhC/G2N8pJ0WSbQFqkLYmAzi T1wNv9Iqx6AmWxBp+6WSd93NCROWrJ5bHGqkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=tiqyUb5cl5RBfZGYBjJhcw00CzaH5GbdibqeDcEfTusqwBsPShz1QvHMnWqihqB/bH m8JgNEqPBF86dFExEJfzOdM3co3IiDNZjnsBMjE7DbZJ9RF8kX8icxgb0cwZpX9TpLnE o/K10M7TCrllgqUGNDJ/5d4cnYOhx371JVgJY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.181.21 with SMTP id bw21mr5719269qcb.117.1277410216253; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.40.71 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:10:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OMSSk1a063uwOw8ptlfZpcJEwFA Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.20.5 availalble for download From: Stack To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HBase 0.20.5 is available for download: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/releases.html The Release Notes are available here: http://su.pr/1prW9y We recommend that all users, particularly those running 0.20.4, upgrade to this release. Thanks to all who contributed to this release Yours, The HBasistas From general-return-1678-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 25 09:30:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58301 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2010 09:30:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 09:30:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 86078 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 09:30:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85369 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 09:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85328 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 09:30:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:30:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:30:22 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OS54r-0004sj-U0; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:20:02 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@hbase.apache.org, java-dev@lucene.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Please get your gpg keys signed! Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:29:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006251129.56899.thomas@koch.ro> Hi, I just wanted to package the new HBase version and since I've just recently read about a malicious software tarball for some Linux IRC server[1], I got back to the habbit of checking signatures. (Yes, I was lazy recently. I'm ashamed.) But checking the signatures of apache software obviously is meaningless, since apache developers appears to not have their keys in the web-of-trust. From three signature files I had laying around on my hard disc, all three keys had zero signatures on the MIT keyserver: 30CD0996 2010-05-03 Michael Stack 68E327C1 2008-10-22 Patrick Hunt FE045966 2009-10-13 Grant Ingersoll So please, when you've your next Hadoop / HBase / Lucene / Apache meetings, take your time for a keysigning party[2]. Or just have some snippet with your keys fingerprint in your wallet and hand it to every other geek you meet. (And make sure he asks you for your ID card to check your identity!) It's also nice to have your gpg fingerprint on your business cards! [1] http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2010/06/12/linux-malware-rears-ugly- head/ [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_signing_party Thank you! Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1679-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 25 09:48:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64177 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2010 09:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 09:48:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 7967 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 09:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7443 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 09:48:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7424 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 09:48:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.78.25] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:48:18 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so40200eye.23 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:47:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.80.8 with SMTP id h8mr105877mul.90.1277459276357; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tcurdt@vafer.org Received: by 10.103.173.3 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:47:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201006251129.56899.thomas@koch.ro> References: <201006251129.56899.thomas@koch.ro> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:47:56 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EKBC1Tf-kObIqwFVtQ3qCfobMeI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please get your gpg keys signed! From: Torsten Curdt To: general@hadoop.apache.org, thomas@koch.ro Cc: dev@hbase.apache.org, java-dev@lucene.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > But checking the signatures of apache software obviously is meaningless, since > apache developers appears to not have their keys in the web-of-trust Many many do :) > So please, when you've your next Hadoop / HBase / Lucene / Apache meetings, > take your time for a keysigning party[2]. We should have done some key signing during the buzzwords conference. For people in Berlin: I am happy to exchange keys to get them into the web-of-trust. Will certainly suggest something like that for our Apache Dinners. cheers -- Torsten From general-return-1680-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 25 16:37:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7264 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2010 16:37:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 16:37:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 81075 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 16:37:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80956 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 16:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80945 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 16:37:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:37:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:37:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 7137 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 16:36:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.205]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:36:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4C24DB16.7090505@apache.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:36:38 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org CC: Thomas Koch , general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@hbase.apache.org, java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Please get your gpg keys signed! References: <201006251129.56899.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: <201006251129.56899.thomas@koch.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thomas, are you attending the summit? There are a number of contributor workshops the day after, all at (or around) the same location. If you feel strongly about this consider attending them, seems like great opportunity for a "key signing party". http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/calendar/13771414/ http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/calendar/13750403/ http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/calendar/13562846/ etc... Here's some detail on WOT at apache: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#web-of-trust Patrick On 06/25/2010 02:29 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to package the new HBase version and since I've just recently > read about a malicious software tarball for some Linux IRC server[1], I got > back to the habbit of checking signatures. (Yes, I was lazy recently. I'm > ashamed.) > > But checking the signatures of apache software obviously is meaningless, since > apache developers appears to not have their keys in the web-of-trust. From > three signature files I had laying around on my hard disc, all three keys had > zero signatures on the MIT keyserver: > > 30CD0996 2010-05-03 Michael Stack > 68E327C1 2008-10-22 Patrick Hunt > FE045966 2009-10-13 Grant Ingersoll > > So please, when you've your next Hadoop / HBase / Lucene / Apache meetings, > take your time for a keysigning party[2]. Or just have some snippet with your > keys fingerprint in your wallet and hand it to every other geek you meet. (And > make sure he asks you for your ID card to check your identity!) It's also nice > to have your gpg fingerprint on your business cards! > > [1] http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2010/06/12/linux-malware-rears-ugly- > head/ > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_signing_party > > Thank you! > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1681-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 26 06:01:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82239 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2010 06:01:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2010 06:01:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 87796 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2010 06:01:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87550 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2010 06:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87542 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2010 06:01:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 06:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 06:00:57 +0000 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so3778158iwn.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.140.99 with SMTP id h35mr1817757ibu.147.1277532037092; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:00:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.72 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:00:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:00:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.89.20100621 "development release" available for download To: user@hbase.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6464eea4296da0489e89b89 --0016e6464eea4296da0489e89b89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear HBase Community, The HBase team is pleased to announce the release of HBase 0.89.20100621. This release is the first of a series of "development releases" that will lead up to the release of HBase 0.90 later this year. To call out every new feature in this release would be too much, but a short list of highlights include fully durable edits, a preview of inter-cluster replication support, and a much-improved command line shell. As a development release series, we have not prepared formal release notes; interested users should inspect the CHANGES.txt and KNOWN-BUGS.txt files included in the distribution. For more information about the purpose and version numbering of the 0.89 development release series, as well as how it relates to the stable 0.20 release series, please refer to the following wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions The release artifacts may be downloaded from: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/hbase-0.89.20100621/ (the release is still propagating to mirrors, so please try again from a different mirror if the first you try does not work) Thanks to all who contributed to this release! We're looking forward to the community's feedback. -- The HBase Team -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6464eea4296da0489e89b89-- From general-return-1682-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 27 15:00:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84792 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2010 15:00:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2010 15:00:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 64723 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 15:00:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64622 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 15:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64614 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2010 15:00:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:00:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhangguoping96@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:00:07 +0000 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so545043fxm.35 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q8bOEDRkyXZuRiuY2P8iLfnbxaFiLj1FdFspM8gnO7k=; b=isIFEDvfMIDcYgeS7W+mOx0mgZsCVKHlYttiCoYRgI0Aw/aDuaTFuw0AALvNV7DQgQ O1raff5P8/yLUjQXDQrC81fwbxKo3kSPCpmhuG2+o/2NJd43bmQT9m+dMh1xoCytr5GO bnTRMgO7aBi2ztmKMH2oaOEkoOwnOiokVXcxc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZtRaUkY9RP7DCwYor+khXFfXkzqX9RzhX9Mj6g7PjhGhq/ZwmxxACv8otMNKl7tqzO 5bABmIHXaYXCWeHAjj7rzW2x9r4MC0PSie8WlOHt+OAxMW87iZITmczcDDEYL1nbo6Qi ogDq3mvcQ3qq9OU70Kiwein5YWA5OegvJfJro= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.141.65 with SMTP id b1mr217404hba.8.1277650786269; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.153.71 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:59:46 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: how to get the current input file in a Mapper From: zhangguoping zhangguoping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f20c5e433aa2048a044101 --001485f20c5e433aa2048a044101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, how to get the current input file in a Mapper in 0.20.2 ? Thanks, --001485f20c5e433aa2048a044101-- From general-return-1683-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 27 16:02:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94138 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2010 16:02:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2010 16:02:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 79351 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 16:02:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79186 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 16:02:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79082 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2010 16:02:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:02:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Dikran_Meliksetian@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.146 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.146] (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:02:07 +0000 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o5RG0TAo002138 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:00:29 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o5RG1j8B1573084 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:01:45 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o5RG1jVO024252 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:01:45 -0300 Received: from d01ml255.pok.ibm.com (d01ml255.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.128]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o5RG1jig024249 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:01:45 -0300 Subject: AUTO: Dikran S Meliksetian is out of the office (returning 07/12/2010) Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Dikran S Meliksetian To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:01:43 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML255/01/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 06/27/2010 12:01:44 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE98f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE9" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE98f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE9 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I am out of the office until 07/12/2010. Note: This is an automated response to your message "how to get the current input file in a Mapper" sent on 6/27/10 10:59:46. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is awa= y.= --0__=0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE98f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBFDDCDFCB8AE9-- From general-return-1684-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 27 18:18:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25458 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2010 18:18:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2010 18:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 71556 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 18:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71330 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 18:18:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71322 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2010 18:18:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:18:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:18:13 +0000 Received: by vws15 with SMTP id 15so5347142vws.35 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VGBgwuJ5DiTDTNPOCIW1qi0xhSlWqdsYsGnyj5e6v5o=; b=R4xBKrDtzy5I0UnbxZyJbKzaNh997feJXP0bZSe3Heb717wYK6fja2oyVWsFeM0FsB LKODubOWkt8dX3qUeBF6FMY+VIVwihZrXOF1IGwUPp3K4EnPJ2Ioz7hwdnvPYuKHgKFg 5vouPgatmu7YgNYtZ/oxoB+CdbskM3D/8cOlU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=C5bSM8YuJ9BNoiIjhK8kLzyBz9YmJKD7w31Ja9xH/0soX17M/uPm/CrY8lZr98mnGX zEREOOjvg04ZsU/Slb34fEB80GPxJfxNmORY9TABMB5o2yA09VAn++WkdMFtpZ/tqm/S gg9WXKKQtlz1ABruDgf91YcGpKgk+Qp87N6+U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.138 with SMTP id mk10mr1985810qcb.229.1277662672427; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.209 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:17:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to get the current input file in a Mapper From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d3017bb9abb048a07058b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364d3017bb9abb048a07058b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How about: FileSplit fileSplit = (FileSplit) context.getInputSplit(); String sFileName = fileSplit.getPath().getName(); On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, zhangguoping zhangguoping < zhangguoping96@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > how to get the current input file in a Mapper in 0.20.2 ? > > Thanks, > --0016364d3017bb9abb048a07058b-- From general-return-1685-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 06:54:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21513 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 06:54:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 06:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 74164 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 06:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73751 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 06:54:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73743 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 06:54:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:54:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zhangguoping96@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:54:27 +0000 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so792398fxm.35 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qSJ2ENodCPNgHTRiWkEoPbEPDFKBF9jaQZbJDsn+SkY=; b=F3uqEpkSh9K+MSQ72m1mEtp3H3s4BDnEku/VDQF2MUSKw0lW53fMGd99j63NxiGlmZ 2zcpeZrIP+H7HAJLpo6mir53nPiK04ph9mI8EORTHQOiCbNnJJhZRiohGkUlAXl7P5rC HeWCQYyj25uOucJHlnM/v82x/V4fVUcNS5UFM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vDwy/FLI5bXYevBoHPmKKtUsg72nMi6nL6+J9YQPakuGYtFyMJpm5LmJ0S5pSQVcdV KyH6FpXgODJyn85LoEPgC4tnJkqChwzCcjyxjtDZ3CJNKU+QuRqwlxbIpxqnJnUyhEV/ 4rSTZBhfHD6yu05h+xJtfY6rfZCgsfln1hoKs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.180.19 with SMTP id f19mr273042hbg.91.1277708045579; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.153.71 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:54:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: MultipleInputs.addInputPath throws Exception From: zhangguoping zhangguoping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f5b10e2ef5c7048a11964f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f5b10e2ef5c7048a11964f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, When I was calling following in hadoop 0.20.2, org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.MultipleInputs.addInputPath(); I got following IOException: "mapred.input.format.class is incompatible with new map API mode." But looks like InputFormat class is mandatory for MultipleInputs.addInputPath. How to correct it? Is there any alternatives? Thanks, --001485f5b10e2ef5c7048a11964f-- From general-return-1686-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 09:26:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68219 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 09:26:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 09:26:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 94112 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 09:26:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93703 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 09:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93692 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 09:25:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:25:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9867BB7DB8 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:25:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c93vDtJBW4qn for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:25:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0D0B7DB7 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:25:24 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1278321912.06161@Hij5j23TqksbSBoyG9JjGQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o5S9PAvr004691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:25:11 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C286A77.4090001@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:25:11 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: The IBM Distribution of Apache Hadoop now available References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5S9PAvr004691 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Stephen Watt wrote: > Hi Folks > > ??IBM has made available a preview version of the IBM Distribution of > Apache Hadoop. You can access it here - > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/idah/ . This distribution contains > Apache Hadoop 0.20.2, a 32-bit Linux version of the IBM SDK for Java 6 SR > 8, and an easy to use web based wizard for the installation and > configuration of Hadoop.?? What scale have you tested that JVM at? > > The best place for questions on this distribution are the threads under > the forum tab, accessible from the link provided above. We'll also be at > the Hadoop Summit.?? > > Regards > ?Steve Watt > > From general-return-1687-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 14:21:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98691 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 14:21:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 14:21:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 85887 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:21:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85775 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:21:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85767 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 14:21:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:21:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sarah.kho@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:21:27 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so4691000wyb.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rZxGMoEbbFpLVsBwdwkiCxm+xH2n/FXoMEtnSZqq0LY=; b=RfWUJJBJ/pv6gSSKkad1zO6sK3xEdIvDkeo4SOiqaXaQh8r7cNGxik+XYMyVY2Men2 +Qx9dxgWzvcVsWn/MaokcgYQNP1aH96kJ3CHAkvTcPdBqzJa+teR/US9iOwNUEcrwFfb M/JrJlmPQbGa+R2uNqO6g43TlOVZ/lhNJBTNg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gAOUhEMdbzChT4cus33BFED2Nyjzz74bxEMbyFJtu8kI1WscGWgMWjqHmRH1Um/C/F tBm5tBbdiLj+miahb9kByRgxVm7UihriDEH8SOW1kCbJmZ5lyggrZhClFJG4Xnxr0FCp JW4kEPRxU2xpRNkE7/jvZms5jyLqg2G3BOP+U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.12 with SMTP id g12mr3762860wef.78.1277734807055; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.55.141 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:50:07 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Does hadoop need a zookeeper installation to work? From: Sarah kho To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e32a4aadf6048a17d14f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7e32a4aadf6048a17d14f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am wondering whether hadoop depends on zookeeper or zookeeper need hadoop to work. When I download hadoop distribution from the website, does it have some zookeeper libraries included? thanks. --0016e6d7e32a4aadf6048a17d14f-- From general-return-1688-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 14:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6063 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 14:54:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 14:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 30642 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:54:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30588 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30580 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 14:54:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:54:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:54:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([10.72.244.235]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5SErS0g068360 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Does hadoop need a zookeeper installation to work? Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:53:28 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Currently, Hadoop (HDFS/Map-Reduce) doesn't depend on ZooKeeper. Arun On Jun 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Sarah kho wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering whether hadoop depends on zookeeper or zookeeper need > hadoop > to work. > When I download hadoop distribution from the website, does it have > some > zookeeper libraries included? > > > thanks. From general-return-1689-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 15:29:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21261 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 15:29:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 15:29:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 82285 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 15:29:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82195 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 15:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82186 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 15:29:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:29:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sarah.kho@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:29:45 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so4788432wyb.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:28:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qXlEdKVQ1Cl4ECdiGugVVt5I1gWVa1QJUvdkcJMhzV4=; b=x4ns/8fDT79CPy8EfaZA23EVqLGWvyK2tdB22OrCBTbQYHrCSO9nv+wqg+SYTFZO0B qJ0nZ4C74ScAC4yPmr/n5RSiQsbVzqucvqocHp8+1Y0BENdwJ1Ul1M6vZ+MUhJ/n4lfV ySMse7ucnmdV/rBrPTqCy0fowfSLGKVF1xCK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NDUQPauK04VCPSgAfreMPAda16vUXrhuue1t56lECRur7Lnp/YY1I1/hucS5zX+OOr ueRzmuqnbaSfRcS4atl6OFLmleu9VIpu2Wf/11NgBSpweKTJ3qWJPBW1t05nC4orepTX xM5dNfTT7cVKXpwQe9sw3y7XHKeD7fGMX+wzw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.199 with SMTP id c49mr3859857wef.29.1277738905351; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.55.141 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:28:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:58:25 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does hadoop need a zookeeper installation to work? From: Sarah kho To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64c5b91ba57048a18c58b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d64c5b91ba57048a18c58b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for your reply. What about ZooKeeper being depended on Hadoop? is there something like that or Hadoop and ZooKeeper are two independent projects? On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Currently, Hadoop (HDFS/Map-Reduce) doesn't depend on ZooKeeper. > > Arun > > > On Jun 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Sarah kho wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I am wondering whether hadoop depends on zookeeper or zookeeper need >> hadoop >> to work. >> When I download hadoop distribution from the website, does it have some >> zookeeper libraries included? >> >> >> thanks. >> > > --0016e6d64c5b91ba57048a18c58b-- From general-return-1690-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 15:58:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28534 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 15:58:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 15:58:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26558 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 15:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26498 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 15:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26490 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 15:58:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:58:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.22] (HELO col0-omc1-s12.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:58:25 +0000 Received: from COL117-W63 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s12.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:57:42 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_44a04635-987c-49cc-bff0-fcd4d656f70f_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: The IBM Distribution of Apache Hadoop now available Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:57:42 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4C286A77.4090001@apache.org> References: ,<4C286A77.4090001@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2010 15:57:42.0596 (UTC) FILETIME=[A455D040:01CB16DA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_44a04635-987c-49cc-bff0-fcd4d656f70f_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Date: Mon=2C 28 Jun 2010 10:25:11 +0100 > From: stevel@apache.org > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: The IBM Distribution of Apache Hadoop now available >=20 > Stephen Watt wrote: > > Hi Folks > >=20 > > ??IBM has made available a preview version of the IBM Distribution of=20 > > Apache Hadoop. You can access it here -=20 > > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/idah/ . This distribution contains=20 > > Apache Hadoop 0.20.2=2C a 32-bit Linux version of the IBM SDK for Java = 6 SR=20 > > 8=2C and an easy to use web based wizard for the installation and=20 > > configuration of Hadoop.?? >=20 > What scale have you tested that JVM at? >=20 My question is why 32-bit? Why not 64? > >=20 > > The best place for questions on this distribution are the threads under= =20 > > the forum tab=2C accessible from the link provided above. We'll also be= at=20 > > the Hadoop Summit.?? > >=20 Considering that there are no posts in the fourm and I posted the first... = :-( I guess today is a travel day to the Hadoop Summit. Unfortunately not all o= f us are in CA or can travel... =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your = inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2= --_44a04635-987c-49cc-bff0-fcd4d656f70f_-- From general-return-1691-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 28 16:35:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43842 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 16:35:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 16:35:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 75770 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 16:35:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75672 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 16:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75664 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 16:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:35:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 43683 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 16:35:06 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.0.164]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:35:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4C28CF3C.4050008@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:35:08 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Sarah kho Subject: Re: Does hadoop need a zookeeper installation to work? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hbase depends on ZK but it recently moved to TLP status. As of today there are no cross dependencies. Patrick On 06/28/2010 08:28 AM, Sarah kho wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > What about ZooKeeper being depended on Hadoop? is there something like that > or Hadoop and ZooKeeper are two independent projects? > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> Currently, Hadoop (HDFS/Map-Reduce) doesn't depend on ZooKeeper. >> >> Arun >> >> >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Sarah kho wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I am wondering whether hadoop depends on zookeeper or zookeeper need >>> hadoop >>> to work. >>> When I download hadoop distribution from the website, does it have some >>> zookeeper libraries included? >>> >>> >>> thanks. >>> >> >> > From general-return-1692-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 00:29:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53248 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 00:29:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 00:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 36345 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 00:29:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36259 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 00:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36250 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 00:29:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:29:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:29:39 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so1695989qwd.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=D2Ul31GMeqQC2v5Um464JdZBGwoU+YMdb92gUoRwVw0=; b=voqEANuOteVBne34qI/fFbZM5lCRT77gLKPgDUhU+Seydswv1L55Fb3MwHpjBEY99g YeIFeBUlq27ch2Ks2JLjkLT/FRa6fMOsixngbLlGEocP0N6dpBidFPYGxiYPEGR3zog5 Nwiz+9Q7OO4/o6Y1RjmyNFHsEiHk3OcCHPfGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SjvUSKLk5ztyLz22Sv4SMIIbsd73fmDMc0EqvFDGn6b8pcZQTJeNUgBGo7HiUA9f11 8W68foXbxTRts5xlvL7wIAiaRjnt0MfL0jQ9eruzZqEmT+5DvNqAzSYfy/nllGrG9jqi Jbn69hpRgHmb4NjKu3cbIXFsl4tcFJyjXS8zI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.61.69 with SMTP id s5mr3957723qah.189.1277771358504; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.67.6 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:29:18 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Can we modify files in HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485172205ed88bc048a205335 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485172205ed88bc048a205335 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hello everyone, After some research I found HDFS only support create new file and append to exiting file. What if I want to modify some parts of a, say 2 Petabyte, file. Do I have to remove it and create it again or we have some alternative way? --001485172205ed88bc048a205335-- From general-return-1693-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 00:53:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56427 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 00:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 00:53:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 56246 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 00:53:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56193 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 00:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56185 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 00:53:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:53:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:53:35 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5T0of82061006 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WYx7qkwgqsVLeVutyzM0NoGti/DnrMl4Sma152t44pwzb1zCd8ljSatu70fR3of5 Message-ID: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:50:41 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli, Just checking on the status of this proposal. In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. I now think we really need some mechanism for new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. For the reasons exactly as you describe in your email. Whether it is going to be HEP or something else, it is best if we adopt it soon. Thanks, --Konstantin On 5/21/2010 1:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > As HDFS and MapReduce have matured the cost and complexity of > introducing features has grown. Each new feature has to consider > interactions with a growing set of existing features, a growing user > base (upgrades, backwards compatibility) and additional use cases > (more and more projects now build on them). At the same time we don't > want the high bar for contribution to unnecessarily hinder new > development and releases. > > Many projects at a similar stage address this by adopting a more > formal way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to their > platforms. Today, new features are often discussed via an umbrella > jira, which may have an attached design document. There are a number > of issues with this approach. The design documents vary in format and > quality, and are often reviewed by a limited audience. They aren't > version controlled. Sometimes the proposal is only partially > specified. Jiras are often ignored. Understanding a proposal and it's > implications through a series of threads in the jira comments is > difficult. It's hard for contributors and users to find these > top-level jiras and follow their status. > > I'd like to propose that core Hadoop adopts something similar to > Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A "HEP" would be a > single primary mechanism for proposing new features, incorporating > community feedback, and recording decisions. The author of the HEP > would be responsible for building consensus and moving the feature > forward. Similarly, some subset of the community would be responsible > for reviewing HEPs in a timely manner and identifying missing pieces > in the proposal. Discussion would occur before patches showed up on > jira. People interested in the core Hadoop roadmap could keep an eye > on the HEPs without the overhead of following jira traffic. > > Why base this on the PEP? The format has proven useful to a > substantial existing project, and I think the workflow is not too > heavy-weight, and well-suited to a community such as ours. That being > said, we could discuss other models (eg Java's JSR). > > Before we get into specifics, is this something the community would > like to adopt in some form? Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to > our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? > > Thanks, > Eli > > 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 > From general-return-1694-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 01:52:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69408 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 01:52:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 01:52:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 87523 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 01:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87461 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 01:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87453 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 01:52:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:52:20 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so117772pwj.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dtNhndlspBaDFmyd0RO/NM+CfGPhwn3/tpf91eeoQUY=; b=I4+6Viy8C3DIOaJavV+0th58XrcqP2GGhpgWC8Q7RGsjC2NAKiiMESB4hGiecOm/Ko n46MWujW42h7fNW8fIMczw/Q1bzNsQfyhE9ouI2500o7hJBf2LKyEEZPwpXYAa6CoebC yTIKsonqTviWR1dmY7pIw41J+FuzBMjyBhB7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FBMB04xdhRArhnL+E28HHM1M8HZyT7fvIErP+XzWolAkwTMN2+7S2V5IgM+Q6/gwcN tPIa7gvIHFp2tmjT5e+psVE3YHLlSXmSHBoMrnMIpX3x1nWUASFuWg8bkma6rhl9RxEu +6VtsssdGMWM7d0fsZ2USShf81VR8LmLceaTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.7.13 with SMTP id 13mr6910264wfg.122.1277776259509; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.231.15 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:50:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:50:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we modify files in HDFS? From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You can not modify file in HDFS, HDFS is designed for write once, read many times. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:29 AM, elton sky wrote: > hello everyone, > > After some research I found HDFS only support create new file and append to > exiting file. What if I want to modify some parts of a, say 2 Petabyte, > file. > Do I have to remove it and create it again or we have some alternative way? > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang From general-return-1695-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 03:05:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94827 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 03:05:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 03:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 19511 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 03:05:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19224 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 03:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19216 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 03:05:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:05:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:05:18 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so932713pxi.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.201.15 with SMTP id y15mr6966095wff.247.1277780635288; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.110.10 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:03:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Konstantin, Apologies for the delay, busy with stuff for the summit. I'll get a concrete proposal to general based on our discussion at the contributor's meeting out this week. Thanks, Eli On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Eli, > > Just checking on the status of this proposal. > > In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. > I now think we really need some mechanism for > new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. > For the reasons exactly as you describe in your email. > Whether it is going to be HEP or something else, it is best > if we adopt it soon. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On 5/21/2010 1:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> As HDFS and MapReduce have matured the cost and complexity of >> introducing features has grown. Each new feature has to consider >> interactions with a growing set of existing features, a growing user >> base (upgrades, backwards compatibility) and additional use cases >> (more and more projects now build on them). At the same time we don't >> want the high bar for contribution to unnecessarily hinder new >> development and releases. >> >> Many projects at a similar stage address this by adopting a more >> formal way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to their >> platforms. Today, new features are often discussed via an umbrella >> jira, which may have an attached design document. There are a number >> of issues with this approach. The design documents vary in format and >> quality, and are often reviewed by a limited audience. They aren't >> version controlled. Sometimes the proposal is only partially >> specified. Jiras are often ignored. Understanding a proposal and it's >> implications through a series of threads in the jira comments is >> difficult. It's hard for contributors and users to find these >> top-level jiras and follow their status. >> >> I'd like to propose that core Hadoop adopts something similar to >> Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A "HEP" would be a >> single primary mechanism for proposing new features, incorporating >> community feedback, and recording decisions. The author of the HEP >> would be responsible for building consensus and moving the feature >> forward. Similarly, some subset of the community would be responsible >> for reviewing HEPs in a timely manner and identifying missing pieces >> in the proposal. Discussion would occur before patches showed up on >> jira. People interested in the core Hadoop roadmap could keep an eye >> on the HEPs without the overhead of following jira traffic. >> >> Why base this on the PEP? The format has proven useful to a >> substantial existing project, and I think the workflow is not too >> heavy-weight, and well-suited to a community such as ours. That being >> said, we could discuss other models (eg Java's JSR). >> >> Before we get into specifics, is this something the community would >> like to adopt in some form? Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to >> our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 >> > > From general-return-1696-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 04:50:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12121 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 04:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 04:50:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 76187 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 04:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75824 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 04:50:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75815 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 04:50:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:50:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.51] (HELO mail-qw0-f51.google.com) (209.85.216.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:50:05 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1571072qwk.38 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:48:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1jF6aHG1LSPkzWpAvC9cAbdCmQop/FlgSHOm4mbbV30=; b=tygV4VVFyW9PJTtS7yihJNsOcXdTJJd+wRCdtFJULOTjiPqHsEQUBBni0HpLsen59Q Ks+SS0HcoBn27i3BPgXR9Qeo25pDtthNpTHi/thfvaUNeMpgOP9VUWVfZN5TxycL3W8J 2gsP9AubgLPQ7GYSPtA5Bx+hzun53Z0rV97kE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fU58xmKHuK2vlOTADibJbgCHwDSE2BZn9DW/Gf58RO/lyjqgvTGSja0JN1IfwrdgfO CKKO5RXwfeZlvsnGE5gwQy5VL9fFhXdaaR97+igOZ+WCPdPaMEAh91sWsllgtYd18CWf Y+rvD0LME67spXYVUod9MiawniAF8YNX01n/Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.113.201 with SMTP id b9mr4083202qaq.66.1277786935310; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.67.6 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:48:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:48:55 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we modify files in HDFS? From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f99de4160b9b4048a23f471 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f99de4160b9b4048a23f471 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanx Jeff, So...it is a significant drawback. As a matter of fact, there are many cases we need to modify. I dont understand why Yahoo didn't provoid that functionality. And as I know no one else is working on this. Why is that? --00c09f99de4160b9b4048a23f471-- From general-return-1697-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 05:03:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14107 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 05:03:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 05:03:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 89678 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 05:03:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89433 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 05:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89425 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 05:03:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:03:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:03:38 +0000 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so7433609iwn.35 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.150.2 with SMTP id w2mr6210294ibv.37.1277787795268; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:03:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.72 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:02:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:02:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Can we modify files in HDFS? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed629fa2a6dd048a2427ad X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ed629fa2a6dd048a2427ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Elton, Typically, large data sets are of the sort that continuously grow, and are not edited or amended. For example, a common Hadoop use case is the analysis of log data or other instrumentation from web or application servers. In these cases, files are simply added, but there is no need to go back and change entries. For the ability to have a more table-like random access storage on top of Hadoop, I would encourage you to look into HBase. It supports random read/write access with low latency. -Todd On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:48 PM, elton sky wrote: > thanx Jeff, > > So...it is a significant drawback. > As a matter of fact, there are many cases we need to modify. > I dont understand why Yahoo didn't provoid that functionality. And as I > know > no one else is working on this. Why is that? > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001636ed629fa2a6dd048a2427ad-- From general-return-1698-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 09:57:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3023 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 09:57:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 09:57:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 65443 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 09:57:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65299 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 09:57:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65290 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 09:57:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:57:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:57:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E001BA657 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:15 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cJ8x+vrwV2J6 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406C71BA5EB for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:15 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1278410222.76672@HuA+Wxde/Ug9BQgu1COKkQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o5T9v1bw002567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:02 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C29C36D.2030806@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:57:01 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we modify files in HDFS? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5T9v1bw002567 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org elton sky wrote: > thanx Jeff, > > So...it is a significant drawback. > As a matter of fact, there are many cases we need to modify. When people say "Hadoop filesystems are not posix", this is what they mean. No locks, no read/write. seeking discouraged. Even append is something that is just stabilising. to be fair though, even NFS is quirky and that's been around since Ether-net was considered so cutting edge it had a hyphen in the title. HDFS delivers availability through redundant copies across multiple machines: you can read your data on or near any machine with a copy of the data. Think what you'd need for full seek and read/write actions * seek would kill bulk IO perf on classic rotating-disk HDDs, and nobody can afford to build a petabyte filestore out of SSDs yet. You should be streaming, not seeking. * to do writes, you'd need to lock out access to the files, which implies a distributed lock infrastructure (zookeeper?) or deal with conflicting writes. * if you want immediate update writes you'd need to push out the changes to the (existing) nodes, and deal with queueing up pending changes to machines that are currently offline in a way that I don't want to think about. * if you want slower-update writes (eventual consistency), then things may be slightly simpler -you'd need a lock on writing and each write would eventually be pushed out to the readers with a bit better bandwidth and CPU scheduling flexibility , but there's still that offline node problem. If a node that was down comes up, how does it know it's data is out of date and where does it get the data from? What will it do if all other nodes that have updated data are offline. > I dont understand why Yahoo didn't provoid that functionality. And as I know > no one else is working on this. Why is that? It's because it scares us and we are happier writing code to live in a world where you don't seek and patch files, but instead add new data and delete old stuff. I don't know what the Cassandra and HBase teams do here. -steve From general-return-1699-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 15:07:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10933 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 15:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 15:07:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 2149 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 15:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2102 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 15:07:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2094 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 15:07:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:07:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sarah.kho@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:07:25 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so5517741wwi.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nkvf2chIW6on2gyQG95S7/NMEmX7GVtHW0BcXvYjpkw=; b=muhYZpZNMYwoL4o86yUUIK/4NRR2IQsHBZUBvYP2uy81Asi811QC7+Jco4GTs0bqdT cdiY8x3H9NrG3su9mGTh6c9i72Po/mkMBUspj+e2TKQJKaQgltcEqGvfRtRiZxJW5x6t F9yoSFyQNx96ZeOsjhaYIuYLsyDoFtURoJ+nQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bY4jRFQSj/Wv1xaZRApLQt3V7mveJPJHy4ZPXIJrVPaGVfDoigpYva2DzkkbLrKgkT oP5HsSER/p6BK5JxbPmpdtOId0rEdo2cMEv8KZXbMa8duEkq36liPsXh7j9ATmHzoHcK W1QBWSHYz+PwPOlT2MB/fgG8nFijmxsgE176g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.170.83 with SMTP id o61mr5263312wel.37.1277824025356; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.55.141 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:37:05 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? From: Sarah kho To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f423d41de87a048a2c97ad X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f423d41de87a048a2c97ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Can you please let me know what are tasks that the taskTracker and JobTracker performs? Thanks. --001485f423d41de87a048a2c97ad-- From general-return-1700-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 15:30:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15341 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 15:30:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 15:30:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 46670 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 15:30:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46619 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 15:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46611 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 15:30:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:30:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:30:27 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so5551300wwi.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6OhOqlPY3cktGe0KlGrf9WzQArsDZpF/Rc4P3GtGqVE=; b=DKU58igQRVKxY9xD/bq8gvRgxchHkemMZbAjJyuYnxv2TaS83LYW3kYiYdnSOdEgHA 90HUkhwu3MKi8rZaxPckcMvreIzIS9HMvYOL8IbLMO7SDQZODKeHX7dd4aJ0zLYuslJd W5yskINSlDbyTEc2R9a0pjKHt+QrFyNrWJxt8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CarF/9kawWiRbaCwKJRcW66+7rRllUZ8lD09jplqrvFbpTs5hD/IvPrS7TzrqmFIrv D+P/wyoLNowZmOVxlvRcyqQlPXIcW+rmUzNxYH9jczaFVLYAskaOa1DEyJQsjXhu2Xpe Bzc9VAWOuexnboWzYAmgTTlMSsE5Nhtnbdnug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.141.137 with SMTP id m9mr5421312wbu.202.1277825346699; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.6 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:29:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:29:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:50, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Eli, > > Just checking on the status of this proposal. > > In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. > I now think we really need some mechanism for > new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. Making and tracking decisions at Apache is done via public ASF mailing lists, exclusively. Any other means of communication, including face-to-face, JIRA, IRC etc, is *not binding*. Every community member has equal say (only PMC members votes are binding though). Committers can veto commits and commit to svn. PMC members have special rights and duties, too, as described in our Bylaws. That's about it. If Hadoop has issues tracking and making decisions, you won't fix that by introducing any formalities. Bernd From general-return-1701-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 17:12:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47430 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 17:12:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 17:12:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 90037 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 17:12:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89927 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 17:12:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89916 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 17:12:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:12:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:12:14 +0000 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so1311836gyg.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5iZQNe8iaw5hTZmBxfUEecU3O5khckpdECxaXq10YE8=; b=mi3x6AHiA9ExbAudwhJkZL8o9fjPHmAFIUwEjN47cjVo85hp/Q+mcoPCG+jA6NWa8m JyfkSOqrspoOgkEnGkQrofQk1N9VADzRld+Lz4oMXszykSnJT/oR1mvpSsK2kEYIDD/u 7oKZOEO8UqJ40baceO9TjWbjn4vhU77ZoPYvo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Vrgam/HPYQ2TS25T+1IjiJhcUpSFPlN6GdZFJtJlAbiSHcB3x8balIYmXPHSw9ImNX jTPwddHDoJpXgUMubCWzj5wz45HPrkaLL0wuJ7h3wPyGdxxoaHRR45dBtt9962is21LP hkoXOcxtJkx3QgDUqMeAMWG0OjNXjsBc+n678= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.79.2 with SMTP id n2mr4693221qak.103.1277831498803; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.21.12 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:11:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, if people decide that some system more organized than email threads is better to keep track of major project proposals, it may help with some aspects of the project. Or it may not. The fact that a pro forma vote by email may also be required at some points to make something "official" shouldn't be a major reason against such a system, if it's otherwise a good idea. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:50, Konstantin Shvachko wr= ote: >> Eli, >> >> Just checking on the status of this proposal. >> >> In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. >> I now think we really need some mechanism for >> new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. > > Making and tracking decisions at Apache is done via public ASF mailing > lists, exclusively. > Any other means of communication, including face-to-face, JIRA, IRC > etc, is *not binding*. > Every community member has equal say (only PMC members votes are > binding though). > Committers can veto commits and commit to svn. PMC members have > special rights and duties, too, as described in our Bylaws. > > That's about it. > > If Hadoop has issues tracking and making decisions, you won't fix that > by introducing any formalities. > > =A0Bernd > From general-return-1702-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 17:51:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57716 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 17:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 17:51:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 29942 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 17:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29861 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 17:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29852 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 17:50:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:50:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:50:53 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=P5gLPY4fUgbbqCb4TqPb2emTbfdzYw5Nr+kk/3aO2bNTTBXj1IJJcbp3 h8GbIVTWj91UbnKHgb6hdtajE/fuxoTFM59B/1OpmIwhkp5YlKQWLEA5C RxlgMAXNz8qAXrn; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1277833853; x=1309369853; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20What=20are=20uses=20of=20taskTracker=20 and=20JobTracker=20services?|Date:=20Tue,=2029=20Jun=2020 10=2017:50:30=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201 .0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<138eef54-9b03-4394-b2dc-15aca04d3d20> |In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=Q0zBiuc+LXt7k9Yp1zqlt+N5NYHHsJJXAtHpLPb23io=; b=tMFhqvo7mOB75fRTDJQ7kDVtB7XEa3M5TFsBQo39RmMP3tWJ8CJKUBvp 42h3a8s9koY5LtIWgSLdg53vUXQfUrfYDL1Vke5JROX1kjL7nryYPFhW4 o6iY/RvO4O89iBC; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,506,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="13743469" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:50:32 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? Thread-Topic: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? Thread-Index: AQHLF5zOfCQ9ryMITkaP1GURVVAGdpKZrUAA Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:50:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <138eef54-9b03-4394-b2dc-15aca04d3d20> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Sarah kho wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Can you please let me know what are tasks that the taskTracker and > JobTracker performs? Pretty much the entirety of the MapReduce framework. You can think of it t= his way: HDFS <--> MR NameNode <--> JobTracker DataNode <--> TaskTracker= From general-return-1703-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 18:03:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60719 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 18:03:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 18:03:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 49522 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:03:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49455 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49447 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 18:03:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:03:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:03:46 +0000 Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so1460526pvh.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:02:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.2.22 with SMTP id 22mr8626960wfb.13.1277834539249; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.110.10 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:02:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:50, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> Eli, >> >> Just checking on the status of this proposal. >> >> In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. >> I now think we really need some mechanism for >> new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. > > Making and tracking decisions at Apache is done via public ASF mailing > lists, exclusively. All proposals will be discussed and voted on the public lists. Per the original mail the proposal must be compatible with current bylaws. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1704-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 18:05:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61137 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 18:05:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 18:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 50941 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:05:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50870 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50854 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 18:05:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:05:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:04:54 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so6247439wyb.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/LshnbYVTH4fxmUdeBiezxClbGoYdvEM8UJejBiXBc4=; b=NqlbpCqW2WbUF+NmG3xMiG61sqao6ULrngzhHN1snNSBervxxSgpiSx8bWD67Fu0m3 HOsLFll+/PwLO14pWCVnvKrgeVOdV9+qdXgMOmQ5OKP2+skzrY6wgHt7/Ci2P+gM3kXj rckmzcvQihopp2ztECa2W9c6qHBs2k5ZqbSJQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tPnI3nOtMWtVlHsTJo/hGFtPeb8Q/uOdRcNHq8s6+vwj5aJMfNTREyKzTq06rRsde3 uLT4ydNgSkS+xmE7ojjmKeAKB6MkiSXuPLsNx1Nw6/DKTLYXPeoXyQsymnwUEqaqK3aI 2YhHUAmbkoUgfrwB06Rk/VtyUpIptmerAPTcc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.160.15 with SMTP id t15mr5446863wek.17.1277834661390; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.6 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 19:11, Jay Booth wrote: > Well, if people decide that some system more organized than email > threads is better to keep track of major project proposals, it may > help with some aspects of the project. As long as this system is under the control of our infra team, this is ok. > Or it may not. =A0The fact that > a pro forma vote by email may also be required at some points to make > something "official" shouldn't be a major reason against such a > system, if it's otherwise a good idea. Discussions must also take place on-list. There is no such thing as "pro forma" on-list activity. Bernd From general-return-1705-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 18:11:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66219 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 18:11:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 18:11:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 58648 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:10:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58607 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:10:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58599 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 18:10:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:10:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:10:52 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so6252802wyb.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:10:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oP9z0lq30F6ve/gjTV0R8SkXnhaafFU6mK/qj1Elmq4=; b=rT87gGnrMkufBbEMZ/G+eok+4WyfInv5SL9xAKdjUnwXaNxF0FEmSIdMdyZoNzw/9L ahxPCly5sG8kgeZSla+lHBgPSlk9dsh5ogVWfB+g4HLJ2EpSGwT8EuS99aVBUUEbKMrY aFxCmUz+ffwm0Kx7uc7JPkMLse9irOVyBcUgQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jhPlL1WT84C2VFF4cdOlpOMLiJPo61TjoOXUwceBFZ6E4IW9D9JQmXZnc3JocJt+gY 1GEDF+Kr2J8GU7W3aS/7VgDNtRsms5VW8o2ga+5ScHxnnhM4RqQVx12H6WS/77OAdo7J xAEGFnh6oceOg+8E71yn4gkOxrBmQBiw4n9hU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.132 with SMTP id a4mr5564718wef.16.1277835031551; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.162.6 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C294361.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:10:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:02, Eli Collins wrote: > On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, Bernd Fondermann > wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:50, Konstantin Shvachko w= rote: >>> Eli, >>> >>> Just checking on the status of this proposal. >>> >>> In the past I was hesitant about introducing more formalities. >>> I now think we really need some mechanism for >>> new feature and project proposals, also tracking decisions. >> >> Making and tracking decisions at Apache is done via public ASF mailing >> lists, exclusively. > > All proposals will be discussed and voted on the public lists. =A0Per > the original mail the proposal must be compatible with current bylaws. Thanks for the clarification. Bernd From general-return-1706-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 18:55:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80053 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 18:55:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 18:55:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 26711 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26653 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26645 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:55:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sarah.kho@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:55:25 +0000 Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so6290576wyb.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dkGy2UIl6bLl504EFSkuhWNbsEFQQzdQmnsG+qecSmg=; b=uBkFZeXn/uNUFe+75P1Scqg6MmePMZOElUcJI1zbymDnB4UijkBHIRD9Cef66iNYWA 1jvpUR6XcSbjRIPnMBKhvue5cbdw220ufDE8f2GODRSHfJMRQO4yDAVLVTWyUgJARNka kLYLt+R83vJqXcY7yaqYQtKskzSBCjkH2aUGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UyXiwQLrpL0MJ3Ixb0apJmTqiUDL9jxBr8rJ5QR53TaBAtmbXqJAxRdZWRvOwBbuJV n//DuGUt58yEFb8UQyycQhP6kdpDUgGpS0RWUO6FZ10KS9Cx6N4ln8u7t5XrJTSpyS4l w7+ogVoJzOU+/GhSwqgQeqx2Sle7NL2O9KkIQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.147 with SMTP id q19mr5532990wek.11.1277837698256; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.55.141 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:54:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:24:58 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? From: Sarah kho To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fbb53164d82048a2fc6bc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367fbb53164d82048a2fc6bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for reply. But we have different services for each of them, for example a service for NameNode and a Service for JobTracker, are they doing separate things each one? On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Sarah kho wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please let me know what are tasks that the taskTracker and > > JobTracker performs? > > Pretty much the entirety of the MapReduce framework. You can think of it > this way: > > > HDFS <--> MR > NameNode <--> JobTracker > DataNode <--> TaskTracker --0016367fbb53164d82048a2fc6bc-- From general-return-1707-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 19:50:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93471 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 19:50:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 19:50:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 4034 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 19:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3961 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 19:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3951 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 19:50:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:50:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.18 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.18] (HELO col0-omc1-s8.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:50:31 +0000 Received: from COL117-W28 ([65.55.34.9]) by col0-omc1-s8.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:49:49 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_36322d3f-df02-421e-90c5-353c27f5151e_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:49:49 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2010 19:49:49.0051 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B8FF4B0:01CB17C4] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_36322d3f-df02-421e-90c5-353c27f5151e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that he was trying to explain that in HDFS=2C you have a name node = and then your data nodes. So you have the name node service on the name node and each data node has a= data node service. When you run a map reduce job=2C you have a Job tracker that resides on the= name node and controls the overall job. On each data node=2C where the jobs run in parallel=2C there exists a task = tracker. > Date: Tue=2C 29 Jun 2010 23:24:58 +0430 > Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? > From: sarah.kho@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > Thanks for reply. >=20 > But we have different services for each of them=2C for example a service = for > NameNode and a Service for JobTracker=2C are they doing separate things e= ach > one? >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Tue=2C Jun 29=2C 2010 at 10:20 PM=2C Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >=20 > > > > On Jun 29=2C 2010=2C at 8:07 AM=2C Sarah kho wrote: > > > > > Hi=2C > > > > > > Can you please let me know what are tasks that the taskTracker and > > > JobTracker performs? > > > > Pretty much the entirety of the MapReduce framework. You can think of = it > > this way: > > > > > > HDFS <--> MR > > NameNode <--> JobTracker > > DataNode <--> TaskTracker =20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search=2C chat and e-mail from your inbox= . http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3= --_36322d3f-df02-421e-90c5-353c27f5151e_-- From general-return-1708-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 29 20:13:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2395 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 20:13:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 20:13:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 32521 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 20:13:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32468 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 20:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32460 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 20:13:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:13:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.180.199.179] (HELO web46314.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (68.180.199.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:13:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 5429 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jun 2010 20:13:04 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1277842384; bh=fEz0ndjXwhJQY77o1S3L49O9Vs4ubskcT1gefIoDf5Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CEihizC5fEH1K8SkHIBGh0f+Eb6z6bZ2VJiaFX12//WZc8AMvDVZdYk+wrvIcTWyHLtAwNSmD+3K0EnebCKSWbEfuof6j72DpruBTby3HZlTD63BMDOduCndYU5HJOLoRKx0OKMqSE/vs9KMg/kWGsqP3UK1+SnfX6oaXTKv1r4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HPYiEUIONWHtVnaB2VFz3eAVCr5d81RfBEPcWY83NnXkV4sWU/LCp7Cd46D7sfGEijSimYEcwTNmU7sNQkcll/JDOlvHQFYM/k2g8uACFNTF4Wk5lBIl1hHowTwMS4wZdJ1rj4BRIZG5gf8TGeIVv8yBcx8OPBjQkzapNZEznxE=; Message-ID: <471613.3450.qm@web46314.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: io3jwcgVM1lzM0H76tzVdIB73mQQPib5D9n6hann.DJ1ynb jxIhSQxqs0d1rwxhBq2D6uQFRV_ZDXl6eqjyPy2NJ79FMrIv.otYLzOyy0uo uw9Iw9D_okDgJwWP4PkFlSKqEPYyd5WsS6Af2mVETfQtdNRPiWBuFJ_ar5n2 ULl1CyCA3zAbYkmKYfawKufrvSVIg2gMEzoAJyVqeukSCkWxX12qW3fD4WF3 pNBKDfjpjqyjrJ.opkbdOpz27pN3wflH3NjxtfXJf.iJ6rfeEkpQzg2j3Zlz PINs1rYuOASM8GJTaIcp8ycK6gfvJp0hRfF1KFxuHtMYoLK8we2opOl1CNBm THcxu0Tdlno85NCWSiWx4tPBJsBhB Received: from [188.74.76.201] by web46314.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:13:04 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Reduce-side join To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-527755146-1277842384=:3450" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-527755146-1277842384=:3450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello everyone, I am trying to use the hadoop's default reduce-side join. I want to use the TaggedMapOutput, DataJoinMapperBase, and DataJoinReducerBase classes. I have added the hadoop's datajoin jar file in my build path but still i get the following runtime error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/contrib/utils/join/TaggedMapOutput Where possibly is the error? Please guide me. Cheers --0-527755146-1277842384=:3450-- From general-return-1709-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 04:15:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33538 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 04:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 04:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 16496 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 04:15:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16196 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 04:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16183 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 04:15:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:15:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:15:37 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so187330pwj.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kqTxNFuB2x3Bsz3ApFZOX6swac6Z+lp/z7LztnXu1wo=; b=k6TBKTNabad7JekhNGZD7iatmZsAOVhLP/QPiYRznNwobcQTVYcPHaZ0zFsobUabIk MEtDsU73Q2wNWou1m/O8VziOoVNBCJqlxpJw2X8BRLIBtTpXA+6RRRiXoU6eZdXcPH37 0GQ6/ZA5L2BAmnhwcBwMH1hnktD/rKVjOBw78= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KbMy188/hOpgvH2b21x3BTN3uuXEowW8qFVuzCAjTgI5AN+dg+alhNQCnMklJdTgut N0qXIsxKQy5esJxa6fFhmk3UDQ4zJ5IsdK+qIDW8E0hJFdrNdgZFEtaeLxgyPBJaRoyd B4AIYbMt9vkGhNY+s0JXY55HaAzg1VShiC534= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.153.9 with SMTP id f9mr9295861wfo.29.1277871255018; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:14:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:44:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I think that he was trying to explain that in HDFS, you have a name node = and then your data nodes. > So you have the name node service on the name node and each data node has= a data node service. > When you run a map reduce job, you have a Job tracker that resides on the= name node and controls the overall job. May or may not be true. In general, for moderately complex cases, it is best to run the name node and jobtracker on different nodes so both masters don't fail where only one of them can. > On each data node, where the jobs run in parallel, there exists a task tr= acker. This is almost always true, of course - it helps Hadoop to achieve data locality by colocating where the task runs with where it has to read data from. Thanks Hemanth > > > >> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:24:58 +0430 >> Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? >> From: sarah.kho@gmail.com >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> >> Thanks for reply. >> >> But we have different services for each of them, for example a service f= or >> NameNode and a Service for JobTracker, are they doing separate things ea= ch >> one? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Allen Wittenauer > > wrote: >> >> > >> > On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Sarah kho wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Can you please let me know what are tasks that the taskTracker and >> > > JobTracker performs? >> > >> > Pretty much the entirety of the MapReduce framework. =A0You can think = of it >> > this way: >> > >> > >> > HDFS <--> MR >> > NameNode <--> JobTracker >> > DataNode <--> TaskTracker > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox= . > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL= :ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3 From general-return-1710-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 05:48:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50977 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 05:48:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 05:48:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 63318 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 05:48:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63071 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 05:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63061 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 05:48:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fariha.atta.pk@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:48:19 +0000 Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so224090fxm.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:46:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yvQPCxjb1SNFAb8VEueYYt9gTXOYoT6gY0a8W5rX5bU=; b=tHhd6raNyIOpNwKy9EIx9L0gWA8z+XKuehBOTCLcwuF93sgVmGk7Xambh+u3PfPYxr ZESgFdBIMv6IoEZi29VpZM5YW/iFWwt7osMv2cr0hj1J/WdfnT+KyS8lr9M6tcrgl5bK HKOimyYF/OTVxvA2aXf8KtCAA7DlH7e3CpE1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pfv3tMk92ADOa4H/0AS4pwXPFOEu3fbAu1L+Gk6DzV6yAeJ1OdwJ6pXjcnH9W44JWa nBomAajAfTCKYLC83WWwdsLWgYlTNxBRV/fImMlIKu8P7pVBR/oFV/N3JKusiUHI5bTL La6G8QvkWdWspjBNtVxx+Nv0L5wB3pxBQ/X5w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.50.193 with SMTP id a1mr6822581fag.34.1277876819346; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.19.5 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:46:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? From: Fariha Atta To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174479ece245ad048a38e194 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174479ece245ad048a38e194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 *Hi, NameNode* serves as a directory namespace manager. It keeps the directory tree of all files in the file system, and tracks where across the cluster the file data is kept. It does not store the data of these files itself. whereas a jobtracker manages job-related parameters. "The JobTracker is the service within Hadoop that farms out MapReducetasks to specific nodes in the cluster, ideally the nodes that have the data, or at least are in the same rack. 1. Client applications submit jobs to the Job tracker. 2. The JobTracker talks to the NameNodeto determine the location of the data 3. The JobTracker locates TaskTrackernodes with available slots at or near the data 4. The JobTracker submits the work to the chosen TaskTrackernodes." [source: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/JobTracker] Best, Jonna --0015174479ece245ad048a38e194-- From general-return-1711-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 06:34:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68791 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 06:34:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 06:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9959 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 06:34:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9669 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 06:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9661 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 06:34:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:34:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:34:35 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so198198qyk.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UEF+5lIMyAelAgpyVuf17EIGdDvLqiouuZNU4Q76gk0=; b=HHXWpVfI3ao4GBiRnBJSRH2nLx01eSALPePZsZF9k0RBimcGEYGetdhg6gu8AklGpP V4SLx5szq4aJMZKhqaoyVTMYiWl4Ke//wwA1l1D2HsBcm1LO3BXsvWOz3VedNreQB02L 9CIT+/22WiLuNTSazBoImlsnOGf2qRCfTOfpY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cswsZa5gMhyU9G6CjKF1S3GI1IPoUsR7xxXvbiEU2HVQNBd7P4x8fVcmhozQRNv4v3 xpwIhHb60263g7GFxaGrpGlU25MWB/Irmr8oLHF8t0hIGFT83uPQ16QENx+mn0wGrf4y sefztHwGS4nhndyVfJVLdROeQvL9Pn5QbAduE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.110.77 with SMTP id m13mr5428016qap.106.1277879653557; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.89.18 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:34:13 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: single thread read/write in HDFS From: elton sky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000feaed6430d0e8da048a398ab4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000feaed6430d0e8da048a398ab4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From my understanding, HDFS uses a single thread to do read and write. Why not using multi-thread? Since a file is composed of many blocks and each block is stored as a file in the underlying FS, we can do some parallelism among blocks. Is this right? Elton --000feaed6430d0e8da048a398ab4-- From general-return-1712-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 06:35:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68910 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 06:35:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 06:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10861 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 06:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10800 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 06:35:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10792 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 06:35:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:35:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zhangguoping96@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:35:23 +0000 Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so242113fxm.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:35:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i+S3jibIY5GvzqBkwU83BsJEdTI1pBq3UxB5owweaP4=; b=kfufaS2xQm5wXmPelmj4cHLRYwkFXcmFDGdL7zoHeo2SPbfxXFx1h59I5qjZ7LFUW9 wniWYxXmAwii6MWhJjvcgc885ceWQXSpv0+WQekfhieMISkGMfwXrDbXDFBOaqBrnNZi Jkkgj+jXALAA8JUhcoHYZkVuaNIaoACVBvT6Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rLcRba4k4Tckd86LafcMH3p/H5eYgAnLKFXsBqSa7HsJZEzpC4WRxAdTG/bpQdh+s7 BEgtVeipO8T6PYQAybgonitmLGMC6A85FuSJyVRZCqBdfMjuONm5+Mg1mEIu6E5ImA6L Ek/SIzlvxaPy0LElm0zi4u7NQ8VNpBMmUsOgo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.140.210 with SMTP id y18mr526619hby.196.1277879703334; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.153.71 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:35:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:35:00 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to get the current input file in a Mapper From: zhangguoping zhangguoping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f19ef4c86f3a048a398dd2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f19ef4c86f3a048a398dd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It works. Thanks. 2010/6/28 Ted Yu > How about: > FileSplit fileSplit = (FileSplit) context.getInputSplit(); > String sFileName = fileSplit.getPath().getName(); > > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, zhangguoping zhangguoping < > zhangguoping96@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > how to get the current input file in a Mapper in 0.20.2 ? > > > > Thanks, > > > --001485f19ef4c86f3a048a398dd2-- From general-return-1713-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 10:03:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22263 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 10:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 10:03:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2660 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 10:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2186 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 10:03:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2163 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 10:03:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:03:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:03:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD91C1BA77F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:03:04 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c2vatex3rTTf for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:03:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779021BA798 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:03:04 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1278496972.15263@+BY2U3TolAzUulr1Y+O8GQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o5UA2poc000713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:02:51 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C2B164B.20503@apache.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:02:51 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: What are uses of taskTracker and JobTracker services? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o5UA2poc000713 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Hi, > >> I think that he was trying to explain that in HDFS, you have a name node and then your data nodes. >> So you have the name node service on the name node and each data node has a data node service. >> When you run a map reduce job, you have a Job tracker that resides on the name node and controls the overall job. > > May or may not be true. In general, for moderately complex cases, it > is best to run the name node and jobtracker on different nodes so both > masters don't fail where only one of them can. More for scale than availability, was my belief; if the NN goes offline, your JT locks up until it comes back anyway >> On each data node, where the jobs run in parallel, there exists a task tracker. > > This is almost always true, of course - it helps Hadoop to achieve > data locality by colocating where the task runs with where it has to > read data from. If you have machines in the room which can come and go without warning -doing Hadoop work with spare cycles- then you can make them task-tracker only, so you don't store persistent data there, just temp files and when the machines get switched to other work you don't lose HDFS data. But you do increase network traffic... From general-return-1714-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 15:47:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39066 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 15:47:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 15:47:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 78483 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 15:47:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78268 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 15:47:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78260 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 15:47:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:47:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:46:58 +0000 Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1044394iwn.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7xuQ1fF46YZZtwQCiX4PCtkCK/Lpas24jNtwmHwyS+c=; b=tFGElXcyKDMlHAUNu8xu7ODgfGLUmifJ3Y+xaK+TAOQ8On3BtNMCpxps0GdlVVuMoa Oeqw3v3317hw6tIvFdRbiPtb9FlnHC7FyQQuBaAFiPhqfvnbPWIjuC7A4BtylXF1CmSj bBnoud73hwqbwk9e/pHGg3iP53R1wles9b7yw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MBti4BNYNByAIDOtOCk8KJZfXSfzVy77qc5JE0wFhTG6Sq/Ct3OmvSFDDUqRSfJgTU EyfPccRGUMvjNz4QHI9VoLRpjEpVs+4p2B6tJsOQdBhdjjWholj4BIFAUUXXZkJFLW2U KAsQgiv6yH/rroeUSImypWF48JKt++fBEopls= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.36.15 with SMTP id s15mr2037946icd.40.1277912797285; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.33.200 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:46:37 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop Platform From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba1ef92c560f43048a4142d7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba1ef92c560f43048a4142d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone, I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a "cloud" for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions materialised? or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test Hadoop jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but I don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to test them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: Thanks in advance. Renato M. --90e6ba1ef92c560f43048a4142d7-- From general-return-1715-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 16:44:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53847 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 16:44:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 16:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 67868 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 16:44:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67754 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 16:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67736 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 16:44:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:44:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:44:13 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o5UGhLk7046350; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:43:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=oA+2DS6NQwsAP864u/KIE5XYXL9bzIDAv8VMEixzWqRuG6jUufq7gLNEMph8gfuf Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:43:21 -0700 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:42:31 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:42:27 -0700 Subject: [Result][Vote] Move Chukwa to incubator From: Eric Yang To: "general@incubator.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Result][Vote] Move Chukwa to incubator Thread-Index: AcsYczkwPxLacQzrSUugc+uLsSrwSQ== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2010 16:43:21.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[598623E0:01CB1873] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Original incubator proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal Vote put forward to incubator: 1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc, 2. accept incubating with tlp resource naming, but -incubating release naming 3. accept incubating requiring all incubator naming conventions, that might help the incubator simplify this decision. Result of the vote: Option 1) Ant Elder, Eric Yang, William A. Rowe Jr. Option 2) Ari Rabkin, Jerome Boulon, Chris Douglas, Greg Reddin Option 3) Bernd Fondermann Owen O'Malley +1 on proposal I am not sure about Chris Mattmann=B9s position, but he raised the question about TLP. Is it ok to keep hadoop naming until we graduate to TLP, hence, we only rename once? =B3-incubating=B2 will be added to release artifacts. What is next? Regards, Eric From general-return-1716-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 17:08:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62529 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 17:08:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 17:08:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1540 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 17:08:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1426 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 17:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1416 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 17:08:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:08:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:07:53 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so745333pwj.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:06:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iNmpyg42ZTiE0JN3+r7d+xG23NUMoYy3fZBbcy9FDe8=; b=ugfd4aD6HIsnE5amSksWkB9LGs0NcVCmL7PY0F0sgnq833ZMPZy2b9PCyHDDMhHvWo 6YxZ3OFZtRxWq94w1XIMhT52MuGJQdeLL5IuhFfGb0HJpSgfw9AgPUbyByQtc2kxZveu mirkbXNN4Wt794Q2QI2H9IgrJ9bk2DciyOPPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=acNC2jYNlPIZjbn92cLTrzDVFBnpXOVwwMsc0A0jAefPMZIOaDzvwbPQuk8LLNaVPm 60jmrS5z35oQRDJqXBjI6cNhzVaOZzQQrvK49+ZkYefEXpLoCQXcBEKA6C+LhegeKX/e o2/OH180ck8WVcLmeSwazgCnFEHdE0ldoZUL8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.15 with SMTP id 15mr10462765wfi.235.1277917588171; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.188.19 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:06:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:36:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Platform From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Renato, > I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a "cloud" > for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions materialised? > or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test Hadoop > jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but I > don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to test > them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: > Thanks in advance. Can you check if OpenCirrus (https://opencirrus.org/) can fit your bill ? It seems like some one like a faculty member can request access by submitting a proposal. Hemanth From general-return-1717-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 17:55:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73653 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 17:55:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 17:55:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 47869 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 17:55:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47797 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 17:55:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47789 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 17:55:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:55:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.0.28] (HELO exprod5og114.obsmtp.com) (64.18.0.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:55:05 +0000 Received: from source ([4.78.218.129]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5ob114.postini.com ([64.18.4.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTCuEV51MeoVFO3RHpbX7miX1KKPmDCBE@postini.com; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:54:44 PDT Received: from unknown (HELO cinmlef09.e2k.ad.ge.com) ([3.159.213.56]) by Cinmlip04.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2010 13:52:21 -0400 Received: from CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com ([3.159.214.56]) by cinmlef09.e2k.ad.ge.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:52:19 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hadoop Platform Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:52:12 -0400 Message-ID: <30B5A69F3E33FE4C83F4C832F5D6E2CF0254F734@CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop Platform Thread-Index: AcsYa39L72UJQtVySXKLKuLoewGb0AAEUuVg References: From: "Yan, Weizhong (GE, Research)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2010 17:52:19.0909 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC5BFF50:01CB187C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Why don't you just simply try Amazon elastic MapReduce? = http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ -----Original Message----- From: Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo [mailto:renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:47 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop Platform Hi everyone, I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a = "cloud" for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions = materialised? or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test = Hadoop jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on = it, but I don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I = need to test them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: Thanks in advance. Renato M. From general-return-1718-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 18:24:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89438 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 18:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 18:24:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 65017 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64951 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64943 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 18:24:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:24:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:24:34 +0000 Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cJQC1e0010ldTLk57JQEiF; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:24:14 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-153-216.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cJPy1e00P2VBGtd3QJQ1HJ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:24:09 +0000 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Message-Id: <3424DED2-C285-477E-9FA5-80A09A9DA6CC@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [Result][Vote] Move Chukwa to incubator Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:23:57 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > On 6/30/10 9:42 AM, "Eric Yang" wrote: > > Original incubator proposal: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal > > Vote put forward to incubator: > > 1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc, > 2. accept incubating with tlp resource naming, but -incubating release > naming > 3. accept incubating requiring all incubator naming conventions, > that might > help the incubator simplify this decision. > > Result of the vote: > > Option 1) Ant Elder, Eric Yang, William A. Rowe Jr. > Option 2) Ari Rabkin, Jerome Boulon, Chris Douglas, Greg Reddin > Option 3) Bernd Fondermann > > Owen O'Malley +1 on proposal Sorry, I meant to vote for option 2. I think that it would be good to have more visibility in before they become a TLP. They also need to figure out how to add new committers to their project. -- Owen From general-return-1719-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 18:50:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98357 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 18:50:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 86167 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86085 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15873 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 17:41:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1277833182; bh=1D9XYMPw2dVBaz1T56ajpjM+Q9MSPjc3iD3OYmoJkuA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vw9+LRj7yj7t58JSHtPC5SilJMywHPTBaV6P+Jm3j5AbrHPhTntfgm4Y3d9fxSiB5x2mRrFj02Va7ITPn19d7hD928NSi1jmIDfl4LscmDi4bzEwUVyVrp/CCjPU/9H7iE+I35B0/Lek+3VKJ/3csHun1eAFXdX7jV/GPBUUf3A= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1jZw93qjA8LZsgPcVByr8VMbrtXyHr2kh8irasht2Pts8sluF3UrIl3zgeKtkkBWq3eRao8Ormzheu+nz4nvqdMe52tUSUDto/NuU/7qSaBC1yI9/wRDD2F+rRvKNJqfidPvUD4UhEkaCuKLI291cWZ5OtawIvDS2Mc/D85EEYg=; Message-ID: <529450.31780.qm@web46316.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: NijDUEAVM1nhBdydP82LbIWg89uIsjs06zXWtuErbIA11MG MQCTv4KLdCNRvCFHIzquPvlJuA8MI0HtZ8_HGVvsUz5yFtpS0sHZquzbzgmj Lsmno88T8b1mdb6HyCybkmlJ7tR29FNmi3T3K6C2J9tmF.D4AV69Lxeg2HDv VBXuSQnJnwXHXZooKhGI6_KME0WkOqycbIZT69VKvsUmpgeoffSaI1b_jUwB Jdzf5U1ycQkjSFW1azxRFK_gfILhaM8etiXVoCoYRdYh3i5QqBD81znRIz5p PUbVjBw3n8XgYtnh.iTyhx_YFDwkGCRLbvgxyBWB6AFLC2P8gEZ27FtoGB7K 6jl_PbyCr6TsFOMBh5Z1ad596cJiI X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Reduce-side join To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1728800411-1277833182=:31780" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1728800411-1277833182=:31780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello everyone, I am trying to use the hadoop's default reduce-side join. I want to use the TaggedMapOutput, DataJoinMapperBase, and DataJoinReducerBase classes. I have added the hadoop's datajoin jar file in my build path but still i get the following runtime error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/contrib/utils/join/TaggedMapOutput Where possibly is the error? Please guide me. Cheers --0-1728800411-1277833182=:31780-- From general-return-1720-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 18:50:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98428 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 18:50:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 87267 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87192 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 18:50:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20930 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 17:45:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1277833420; bh=Crb7VJEDBrOgPqQfc6+dzlxNwk4ROapDer2hjCgA9fI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xt28wBhFo5f7kYhPitPDDUZagw5c1a9HPZPaqsr5T702nVDV95On+T9RvSyKysWgYdlqNf0UYWMxUUqDANsavrMLn5xszzQ3Eiq9S2TUS6beOFTztxw1p9u4RhAkIo0AEScPFuMml12NyEKGUYQndEu2yxICj2rroAv5oHQEKqM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oVBgXX4KfgdGiy3c88yiCAOP3r2bLwcSQsiX4FKgzxJ3jl518W5eezb7SzJn8pe1SRAH3OmNo9Wr8vlyGzaqHJM17ChBBt/obdZ3U4oKq8ko6XX5iwb9l6GDiA0TMxnlFl4xeL19wBGX9b6Ur0Y9qb34DqtD/H0Y7axturzYOvM=; Message-ID: <608856.6167.qm@web46314.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9ZuV208VM1k4JT5Va6N3z21yW7_RxvzWvwS2hWpIZPkgY0P JWUiDZawS6agj.aiyUfBRvrbfXfVfbxDavZGbrjWNRENI3tJSN4gJOPBhLG_ QtD2gFP7e3vAYw_ZhO6dOirA386RT3vzbi.AlNKtojNQRIJVInhpwFNk5.xN jP2X5eunWZWlkz382ugpoUj7WZZGLa05dRSicESFjeVjbSwfihJOEXqGmyIu z65VgvAsnHCEIBV4nDuYYT2UOmP51kuDauFnZDO_e2c39wWnjb5TbLVvSzrA 69wtv7LHo30I1LBwzcGAFPfuX0JkMz3c.P0wgtSw_jtnljsJk40orcGoKcI7 qu97bVopIt1M_YHYHmAZsmGjHb.1q X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:43:40 -0700 (PDT) From: abc xyz Subject: Reduce-side join To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-745025091-1277833420=:6167" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-745025091-1277833420=:6167 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello everyone, I am trying to use the hadoop's default reduce-side join. I want to use the TaggedMapOutput, DataJoinMapperBase, and DataJoinReducerBase classes. I have added the hadoop's datajoin jar file in my build path but still i get the following runtime error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/contrib/utils/join/TaggedMapOutput Where possibly is the error? Please guide me. Cheers --0-745025091-1277833420=:6167-- From general-return-1721-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 30 23:40:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88713 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 23:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 23:40:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 37532 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 23:40:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37458 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2010 23:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37449 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2010 23:40:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:40:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:40:48 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so715833qwd.35 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:40:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.100 with SMTP id z36mr6824129qaa.84.1277941227040; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.234.3 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <30B5A69F3E33FE4C83F4C832F5D6E2CF0254F734@CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com> References: <30B5A69F3E33FE4C83F4C832F5D6E2CF0254F734@CINMLVEM12.e2k.ad.ge.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:40:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Platform From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8e5b59e1afa0048a47e0ab X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f8e5b59e1afa0048a47e0ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you want to use an open API and be cloud-provider agnostic, check out Whirr: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/whirr.html. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Yan, Weizhong (GE, Research) wrote: > Why don't you just simply try Amazon elastic MapReduce? > http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo [mailto:renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:47 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Hadoop Platform > > Hi everyone, > > I read a while ago that maybe IBM or Yahoo! were going to provide a "clou= d" > for academic purposes. Does anybody know if those intentions materialised= ? > or if there any other ( free or not so expensive ) platform to test Hadoo= p > jobs??? I mean, obviously there would be several limitations on it, but I > don't have access to a cluster and I have some Hadoop jobs I need to test > them, so I can prove to my people the power of it (: > Thanks in advance. > > > Renato M. > --00c09f8e5b59e1afa0048a47e0ab-- From general-return-857-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 01 06:57:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77732 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2010 06:57:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2010 06:57:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 92878 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2010 06:57:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92799 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2010 06:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92789 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2010 06:57:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:57:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.17] (HELO QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:57:08 +0000 Received: from OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Q6i61d0011GXsucAA6woeC; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:56:48 +0000 Received: from [10.108.25.199] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Q6wR1d0042VBGtd8T6wVW5; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:56:45 +0000 Message-Id: <677239CF-8546-4E94-9D6E-65AA472EF5C0@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <63C88D50-5DD1-4A39-80D0-596BF9FD7E89@noaa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: What is included in each download Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:56:23 -0800 References: <63C88D50-5DD1-4A39-80D0-596BF9FD7E89@noaa.gov> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: > Hi All: > > I am new to what is in this Apache Project. When I go t http://hadoop.apache.org/index.html > , a glaring omission, IMO, is any description of what contains > what, and what I get if I do a download. Does Hadoop common contain > hbase and mapreduce and hdfs, or do I need to install these > separately, or what. I skimmed several of the starting documents, > and they do not tell you that either. Same with the other > components listed on that page. > > Any information on that would be greatly appreciated, Ok, it goes like this. After 0.20 Core split into 3 subprojects (Common, HDFS, MapReduce). So if you are downloading Core 0.20.1, you'll get all 3 of them. HBase, Hive, Pig, and ZooKeeper are all separate sub-projects and you need to download them separately. -- Owen From general-return-858-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 01 15:25:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78165 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2010 15:25:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2010 15:25:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30644 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2010 15:25:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30601 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2010 15:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30591 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2010 15:25:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:25:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.249.95.37] (HELO mail.cruzio.com) (63.249.95.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:25:04 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.84] (dsl-68-170-179-94.dhcp.cruzio.com [68.170.179.94]) by mail.cruzio.com with ESMTP id o01FOfGI013625 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 07:24:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: What is included in each download From: Roy Mendelssohn In-Reply-To: <677239CF-8546-4E94-9D6E-65AA472EF5C0@apache.org> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 07:24:41 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B9B6C64-23C4-4D74-8030-5E055318D67C@noaa.gov> References: <63C88D50-5DD1-4A39-80D0-596BF9FD7E89@noaa.gov> <677239CF-8546-4E94-9D6E-65AA472EF5C0@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks! Happy new years, -Roy M. On Dec 31, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Roy Mendelssohn wrote: >=20 >> Hi All: >>=20 >> I am new to what is in this Apache Project. When I go t = http://hadoop.apache.org/index.html, a glaring omission, IMO, is any = description of what contains what, and what I get if I do a download. = Does Hadoop common contain hbase and mapreduce and hdfs, or do I need to = install these separately, or what. I skimmed several of the starting = documents, and they do not tell you that either. Same with the other = components listed on that page. >>=20 >> Any information on that would be greatly appreciated, >=20 > Ok, it goes like this. After 0.20 Core split into 3 subprojects = (Common, HDFS, MapReduce). So if you are downloading Core 0.20.1, you'll = get all 3 of them. HBase, Hive, Pig, and ZooKeeper are all separate = sub-projects and you need to download them separately. >=20 > -- Owen ********************** "The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. = Government or NOAA." ********************** Roy Mendelssohn Supervisory Operations Research Analyst NOAA/NMFS Environmental Research Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center 1352 Lighthouse Avenue Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097 e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@noaa.gov (Note new e-mail address) voice: (831)-648-9029 fax: (831)-648-8440 www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/ "Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill." "=46rom those who have been given much, much will be expected"=20 From general-return-859-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 16:05:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88638 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 16:05:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 16:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 33396 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:05:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33304 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:05:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33294 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 16:05:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:05:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.72] (HELO mailout03.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:05:34 +0000 Received: from mailint03 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5ED1165B2 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint03 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803C611659B for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:05:14 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA8E20.DDCE3774" Subject: Hadoop with SELinux? Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:05:14 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F033F8CFE@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop with SELinux? Thread-Index: AcqOIN2ppXfWnH3TTbWRjg2vdggfUg== From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2010 16:05:14.0709 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDF04850:01CA8E20] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA8E20.DDCE3774 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello list Can someone please tell me if it would be possible to run hadoop with = SELinux enabled across the cluster? Are there any known issues or = better, how2's I can be pointed at? Also interested in running iptables = on the nodes - easy to do? Many thanks in advance Robert Robert Gibbon Solutions Architect Integration Design & Solution Engineering Vodafone Group Service GmbH Mannesmannufer 2, D-40213 D=FCsseldorf, Germany Amtsgericht D=FCsseldorf, HRB 53554 Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung: Helmut Hoffmann, Dr. Joachim Peters ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA8E20.DDCE3774-- From general-return-860-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 16:48:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1747 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 16:48:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 16:48:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 91705 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91628 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91618 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 16:48:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:48:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:48:42 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o05Foiix025276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:50:44 -0800 Message-ID: <4B436D53.2030406@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:48:19 -0800 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop with SELinux? References: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F033F8CFE@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F033F8CFE@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060902080204030001040805" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------ms060902080204030001040805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have used selinux on our large cluster with HDFS (we don't use MR).=20 The only issue I've found is that the mount program does not have=20 permission to execute java, which prohibits you from mounting the fuse=20 filesystem from /etc/fstab. This is fixed with the policy file below. require { type mount_t; type shell_exec_t; type proc_net_t; type random_device_t; type java_exec_t; type fusefs_t; class process { execstack execmem getsched setrlimit }; class tcp_socket { accept listen }; class chr_file read; class file { execute read getattr execute_no_trans }; class dir { read getattr search }; } #=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D mount_t =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D allow mount_t fusefs_t:dir { read getattr }; allow mount_t java_exec_t:file { read getattr execute execute_no_trans };= allow mount_t proc_net_t:dir search; allow mount_t proc_net_t:file { read getattr }; allow mount_t random_device_t:chr_file read; allow mount_t self:process { execstack execmem getsched setrlimit }; allow mount_t self:tcp_socket { accept listen }; allow mount_t shell_exec_t:file { read execute getattr execute_no_trans }= ; --Mike On 01/05/2010 08:05 AM, Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group wrote: > Hello list > > Can someone please tell me if it would be possible to run hadoop with S= ELinux enabled across the cluster? Are there any known issues or better, = how2's I can be pointed at? Also interested in running iptables on the no= des - easy to do? > > Many thanks in advance > Robert > > Robert Gibbon > Solutions Architect > Integration Design& Solution Engineering > > Vodafone Group Service GmbH > Mannesmannufer 2, D-40213 D=FCsseldorf, Germany > Amtsgericht D=FCsseldorf, HRB 53554 > Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung: Helmut Hoffmann, Dr. Joachim Peters > > > --------------ms060902080204030001040805 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMEDCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBAYwggLu oAMCAQICAnbUMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMx FjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwHhcNMDkwMjAzMDUzMzA3WhcNMTAwMjAzMDUzMzA3 WjBgMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIZG9lZ3JpZHMxDzAN BgNVBAsTBlBlb3BsZTEeMBwGA1UEAxMVTWljaGFlbCBUaG9tYXMgNzI1Mzc0MIIBIjANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA3am27G7W/7Zw5ec/CirtaeSb7yy28gLko9rjSnll X1B9Yp3ecWlTVME6muVRtAelEnRtxkpFYM04spxwR0YL/0F8WwAOMAthwqIR4p5AA3PzdexY 3WNDvgk/+Z8FWON21NX2N+VMf/okhgR6UVvqhtf/hNcMWywbPpzwSWnSlXZatTpO/m35hlrY c3spPDz3u7StAd0aZuFZvIX4y+bHtmQ5efcvariWfs3NWC6o5AXNY0AxkrGNnowh/q4iAi7j kUK8W8/1w9ytZhkNgk/bXi090Yktku/CwWHoNTT+5lJ//2VH8EZVVzjBI0aLXwzeJu/Pdcps wjNZBZN9OxYFvQIDAQABo4HAMIG9MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIF4DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMC BPAwGAYDVR0gBBEwDzANBgsqhkiG90wDBwECCjA6BgNVHR8EMzAxMC+gLaArhilodHRwOi8v cGtpMS5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvQ1JMLzFjM2YyY2E4LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNA aGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZHRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCn6RiomxqyDr4lWvxWHtJgmn4B9eEVwlciFI3wkNzS+fRbhUS2W9sa u7BDeYWAnjDdBR/H2P5HDmtGyQ3FUEgIauPeltQgPZ0OvvjHaAmzqyaVJVCpiCXr9aXOMEil 9AcTZuLbgv8OcnBfZizEhpjO7dFmsv4bovDxx/9UK6WRCPEZRXXctRvo4EtbwmloYh3MGtpQ tSztL1VlbEhwczG8JXVEz2OUKiC8An9o5av+zTu9i+6lkXaqOLWun6y/weEXTvA+PvZEwBl4 jtXC/aiuWcQGp68VNhQQh1s7drRE+6StvqPWZolWPVRuhMOCDnRJJrB45rD6udgq2BjRpV4D MIIEBjCCAu6gAwIBAgICdtQwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29y ZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRo b3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0wOTAyMDMwNTMzMDdaFw0xMDAy MDMwNTMzMDdaMGAxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2Vn cmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVvcGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDdqbbsbtb/tnDl5z8KKu1p5JvvLLby AuSj2uNKeWVfUH1ind5xaVNUwTqa5VG0B6USdG3GSkVgzTiynHBHRgv/QXxbAA4wC2HCohHi nkADc/N17FjdY0O+CT/5nwVY43bU1fY35Ux/+iSGBHpRW+qG1/+E1wxbLBs+nPBJadKVdlq1 Ok7+bfmGWthzeyk8PPe7tK0B3Rpm4Vm8hfjL5se2ZDl59y9quJZ+zc1YLqjkBc1jQDGSsY2e jCH+riICLuORQrxbz/XD3K1mGQ2CT9teLT3RiS2S78LBYeg1NP7mUn//ZUfwRlVXOMEjRotf DN4m7891ymzCM1kFk307FgW9AgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1Ud DwEB/wQEAwIE8DAYBgNVHSAEETAPMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQIKMDoGA1UdHwQzMDEwL6AtoCuG KWh0dHA6Ly9wa2kxLmRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZy9DUkwvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiB FnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0X DV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAKfpGKibGrIOviVa/FYe0mCafgH14RXCVyIUjfCQ3NL5 9FuFRLZb2xq7sEN5hYCeMN0FH8fY/kcOa0bJDcVQSAhq496W1CA9nQ6++MdoCbOrJpUlUKmI Jev1pc4wSKX0BxNm4tuC/w5ycF9mLMSGmM7t0Way/hui8PHH/1QrpZEI8RlFddy1G+jgS1vC aWhiHcwa2lC1LO0vVWVsSHBzMbwldUTPY5QqILwCf2jlq/7NO72L7qWRdqo4ta6frL/B4RdO 8D4+9kTAGXiO1cL9qK5ZxAanrxU2FBCHWzt2tET7pK2+o9ZmiVY9VG6Ew4IOdEkmsHjmsPq5 2CrYGNGlXgMxggNbMIIDVwIBATBvMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJ k/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAU BgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDECAnbUMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggHBMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDEwNTE2NDgxOVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkE MRYEFKnQFh9pgfky+jikdrvLrfA9LQ0AMF8GCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFSMFAwCwYJYIZIAWUDBAEC MAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzAN BggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDB+BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxcTBvMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcx GDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXRpZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDECAnbUMIGABgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFxoG8w aTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYD VQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIC dtQwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEA0zbC3y7bJLUXK5C36vMXILilvPHvSLc7lwVkVBKvb54l xQ2G/UsOTR82hXTOeWMj0FHTLQDY8++D3uLlaZzhwN6NzUk/mrGW53nyoJ3y/zau7sigCye9 VKI5FTv8vLeCnPMLlajfGNFe/rmoRlGegE0cLtL2AXeW5Yu7sl8MzMOkfJgJjBcmpJr24X1u 1PyAN3XhzTxdcarhQmYK89HSOjCd4ti9qssbV6dFqYXsATAh9tRL4/a/Y0NSkRsXEApDZRoz x6nnQy6a4ygFrxPTLwY5kYqCKEblBcWEWM4i9iOcZ6aqbiWycTGT4h8aa/yQ/wxUw144o+56 4sRmZq5J3AAAAAAAAA== --------------ms060902080204030001040805-- From general-return-861-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 16:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3345 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 16:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 16:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1547 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1478 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 16:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1468 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 16:55:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:55:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of psdc1978@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:55:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so5273466fgg.11 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:54:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Dst4oUSpe+6eKv7P0GFo5sva/PX3DImtiFCGIUXPwNw=; b=l8Mc4FSw/K/7CSDadrAGI1irl3QfmxBiqbqc7selspnpxndxOxg17vFkZPsrPVUpfS kgEY7Jn8eTSqsHDtcEDkyKcflfbAheSX2DCEBHOy6uhuM+aQGJzDoD3xthaSEG/uQu8Y WX9R+zULuezsioblEFBCc4hNBFTGb1C7XiX8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XmGm+5LYrr3MXXcSkYvnVMVdft3aCHeZ7s2PiH5+HGxmyPvtXCjXIHOXhtRB49RGKU nvzQHBx0D2BfcJgEzpul6FcXtiBiMD2+LpnonOMR5alexAE2hYHRDlmn27+q29MDWlO6 tJEqtjKcI8Weiciit+NHHzq12M3Ez7uimJWpk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.170.28 with SMTP id q28mr811898hbe.149.1262710494700; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:54:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:54:54 +0000 Message-ID: <61fec3fc1001050854l7436b98ek4c632853e8473ac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: heck if I'm subscribed to this list From: psdc1978 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, It's just to check if I'm subscribed to this list, because I posted some questions and I haven't got yet a response. -- Pedro From general-return-862-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 18:29:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44931 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 18:29:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 18:29:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13442 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 18:29:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13347 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 18:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77610 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 09:42:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) From: "qin.wang" To: Subject: Three questions about Hadoop Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:42:08 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA8E2E.6842F9A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcqN60HMFYGT6hAZSHqDno6m9jMjMw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/10258/Tue Jan 5 03:21:01 2010 on mail.i-soft.com.cn X-Virus-Status: Clean ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA8E2E.6842F9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi team, =20 When I try to do some research on Hadoop, I have several high level questions, if any comments from you it will do great help for me: =20 1. Hadoop assumes the files are big files, but take Google as an = example, it seems the google result for user are small files, so how to understand = the big files=A3=BFAnd what=A1=AFs the file content for example? =20 2. Why are the files write-once and read-many times? =20 3. How to install other softwares on Hadoop, is there any special requirements for the software? Do they need to support the Map/Reduce = module and then can be installed?=20 =20 It will be very appreciated for your help. =20 =CD=F5 =C7=D9 Annie.Wang =20 =C9=CF=BA=A3=CA=D0=D0=EC=BB=E3=C7=F8=B9=F0=C1=D6=C2=B7418=BA=C57=BA=C5=C2= =A56=C2=A5 Zip code: 200 233 Tel: +86 21 5497 8666-8004 Fax: +86 21 5497 7986 Mobile: +86 137 6108 8369 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA8E2E.6842F9A0-- From general-return-863-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 18:38:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56380 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 18:38:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 18:38:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 27038 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 18:38:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26992 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 18:38:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26982 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 18:38:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:38:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.243] (HELO QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:38:26 +0000 Received: from OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43]) by QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Robp1d0020vyq2s5Due5NR; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:38:05 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Rudw1d0072SbwD53Rudzwq; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:38:03 +0000 Message-Id: <800C45C0-4738-4536-B9D9-DEDC03D9C33B@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <61fec3fc0911231410y23a02102xf52f7bed2f2afa1e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: How compile hadoop-0.20.1 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:37:54 -0800 References: <61fec3fc0911231410y23a02102xf52f7bed2f2afa1e@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:10 PM, psdc1978 wrote: > Hi all, > > 1 - I'm trying to compile hadoop-0.20.1 but I'm facing several errors. > Hadoop includes several subprojects, but these subprojects are all > compiled > in one file called hadoop-0.20.1-core.jar. If I just want to update > the code > in the MapReduce component, do I have to compile all the project? The project split happened after the 0.20 branch. Common, HDFS, and MapReduce were a single project named Core. > 3 - Is there any tutorial that helps how to compile Hadoop? http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > 4 - Should I try to compile hadoop in windows with Cygwin, or should I > compile inside Ubuntu? I'd strongly suggest Ubuntu. Very few organizations other than Microsoft run large Windows clusters. *smile* Of course compiling the jars can happen on any operating system, but the native parts (if you want them) need to be compiled on the deployment platform. -- Owen From general-return-864-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 19:30:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72768 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 19:30:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 19:30:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 14160 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 19:30:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14089 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 19:30:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14079 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 19:30:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:30:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:29:58 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so11206154pwi.29 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:29:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.154.2 with SMTP id g2mr3856424wfo.18.1262719776268; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:29:36 -0800 (PST) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:29:16 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0a6c0b72124047c6fdb7a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0a6c0b72124047c6fdb7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, In a recent discussion, we noticed that the 0.20.2 HDFS client will not be wire-compatible with 0.20.0 or 0.20.1 due to the inclusion of HDFS-793 (required for HDFS-101). This begs a few questions: 1) Although we certainly do not guarantee wire compatibility between minor versions (0.20 -> 0.21) have we previously implied wire compatibility between bugfix releases? 2) Is the above something we *should* be guaranteeing already? 3) If we haven't guaranteed the above, how many users think we have? (ie how do we correctly call out this fact in the 0.20.2 release notes in such a way that no one gets surprised). I can imagine plenty of organizations where a lockstep upgrade between client and server is difficult, and we should make sure that cluster operators know it will be necessary. Since it wasn't necessary between 0.20.0 and 0.20.1, or various 0.18 releases, people may have grown used to non-lockstep upgrades. 4) If the above are problems, would it be worth considering a patch for branch-20 that provides a client that is compatible with either, based on the datanode protocol version number of the server? It seems like a bit of scary complexity, but wanted to throw it out there. Thanks -Todd --001636e0a6c0b72124047c6fdb7a-- From general-return-865-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 20:06:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80678 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 20:06:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 20:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 60551 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 20:06:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60464 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 20:06:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60454 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 20:06:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:06:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:06:44 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=tf3kx6ZGMOQT8L/mngQ43pTO6EeH3p/UsW2IRDgEDUJKi+di/LxvawRZ 3dj4RHcDhyc7f9PKnU4yFlA95CZ1EAkIaKgMX/AZ63VrQFULbSyIQjTE2 1+DL7CDlfno89/g; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1262722004; x=1294258004; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=200.20.2=20HDFS=20incompatible=20with=200 .20.1|Date:=20Tue,=2005=20Jan=202010=2012:06:19=20-0800 |Message-ID:=20 |To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0 |Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<45f85f 71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com>; bh=DfXVbUqNWD1xy19uNVI71ZOJ891xDkSSZtFmvfFHquY=; b=kGqN3CXa1RertOQXjHN4TIgJGQFMKuy6jWgJPT7GI6BFJESHP4H6Eqqq RKf589MhM+x3hBDa5dbIXH/noJBr+LXDOvB27ENEmArKYuB3htztmvOkI GwM9lqYlEf0IGMz; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,224,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="10544516" Received: from 172.16.22.109 ([172.16.22.109]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:06:22 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:06:19 -0800 Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Thread-Index: AcqOQotTGyJBfoV1pU22ZYRNM8o24g== In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/5/10 11:29 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > 1) Although we certainly do not guarantee wire compatibility between minor > versions (0.20 -> 0.21) have we previously implied wire compatibility > between bugfix releases? IIRC, it has been implied and was a goal but not officially written anywhere public that I know of. > 2) Is the above something we *should* be guaranteeing already? A) From an ops perspective, the lack of compatibility between even minor releases is a pain. B) Most folks with even slightly complex environments are likely patching Hadoop. A good chunk of those are likely in ways that breaks compatibility. [For example, we're working on a TCP buffer patch for HDFS to fix what we suspect is a latency problem. Does it break compat? Maybe.] > 3) If we haven't guaranteed the above, how many users think we have? (ie how > do we correctly call out this fact in the 0.20.2 release notes in such a way > that no one gets surprised). I suspect most folks don't even know that micros are incompatible until they suddenly realize that distcp doesn't work. > I can imagine plenty of organizations where a > lockstep upgrade between client and server is difficult, and we should make > sure that cluster operators know it will be necessary. Since it wasn't > necessary between 0.20.0 and 0.20.1, or various 0.18 releases, people may > have grown used to non-lockstep upgrades. I can easily see many organizations only upgrading when it breaks due to the Hadoop binaries being spread far and wide and under the control of many different departments without any sort of centralized management. Despite the development model, I doubt few ever do just a mapred or hdfs upgrade, so any change in the stack will likely trigger a full Hadoop upgrade. > 4) If the above are problems, would it be worth considering a patch for > branch-20 that provides a client that is compatible with either, based on > the datanode protocol version number of the server? It seems like a bit of > scary complexity, but wanted to throw it out there. Everyone knows I don't mind playing devil's advocate :), so let me ask the obvious question: Bugs are bad, etc, etc, but is it so critical that it has to be in the 0.20 branch at all? I'd rather see the community spend cycles on 0.21 than worrying about 0.20 given that we're fast approaching the 1yr birthday of 0.20.0.... From general-return-866-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 22:07:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23126 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 22:07:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 22:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 27988 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 22:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27902 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 22:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27892 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 22:07:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:07:04 +0000 Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RoTJ1d0070cZkys53y6Zks; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:06:33 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ry6a1d00F2SbwD53Wy6dCR; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:06:42 +0000 Message-Id: <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:06:33 -0800 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 5, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > 1) Although we certainly do not guarantee wire compatibility between > minor > versions (0.20 -> 0.21) have we previously implied wire compatibility > between bugfix releases? Correction. Pre-1.0, the 0.N to 0.N+1 is a major upgrade. After 1.0, 1.N to 1.N+1 is a minor. In both cases, X.Y.z to X.Y.z+1 is a patch release. I thought we had it documented somewhere, but can't find it. There is some discussion of compatibility in HADOOP-5071 that should be pulled out into a wiki page. The standing rules are that you don't incompatibly break APIs or wire protocols in patch release. So, this patch violates the rule and should have had a vote called before it was applied to branch-0.20. (And arguably branch-0.21, although since it hasn't been released, it isn't nearly the same level or problem. > 2) Is the above something we *should* be guaranteeing already? Patch releases: 1. Must be backwards API compatible without a client recompile. 2. Must be on the wire compatible. Exceptions require a vote of the committers. We should also put a notice of any exceptions at the top of the release notes. > 4) If the above are problems, would it be worth considering a patch > for > branch-20 that provides a client that is compatible with either, > based on > the datanode protocol version number of the server? It seems like a > bit of > scary complexity, but wanted to throw it out there. I would like Hairong to consider if she could fix the issue in 0.20 without the incompatible change. If it can not be done (or no one wants to do the work), we should vote whether the change should be made. -- Owen From general-return-867-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 05 23:05:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46925 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 23:05:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 23:05:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 96620 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 23:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96540 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 23:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96522 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 23:05:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:05:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:04:58 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o05N3dnx073865; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:03:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=sM87bamRQ4dC13j8kDOGiuDV9+n4X9hJol9lKr4CbV9uCBCeSnGqU2hkMa9krPHn Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:03:39 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:03:38 -0800 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Jan 20th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Jan 20th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQGvMSDFA= Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDA099349@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, Happy new year! RSVP is now open for the first 2010 Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yahoo= ! Sunnyvale Campus, planed for Jan 20th. Registration is available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/12229988/ Agenda will be posted soon. Looking forward to seeing you there Dekel From general-return-868-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 00:40:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73973 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 00:40:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 00:40:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 66573 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 00:40:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66486 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 00:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66476 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 00:40:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:40:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:40:30 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o060dkGb048520 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:39:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=QGAdjRNH0pQL132e5/xptvaVVQP/WQZ3S6WGkxKbETpol/CrrkUjisECUvhKuGK7 Message-Id: <1E4D49F4-98E7-438C-8467-0FE88DCD4517@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-963344818 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:39:46 -0800 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-3-963344818 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jan 5, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > 1) Although we certainly do not guarantee wire compatibility between > > minor > > versions (0.20 -> 0.21) have we previously implied wire > compatibility > > between bugfix releases? > > Correction. Pre-1.0, the 0.N to 0.N+1 is a major upgrade. After 1.0, > 1.N to 1.N+1 is a minor. In both cases, X.Y.z to X.Y.z+1 is a patch > release. > > I thought we had it documented somewhere, but can't find it. There is > some discussion of compatibility in HADOOP-5071 that should be pulled > out into a wiki page. > Hadoop-5071 documents the *proposed* post 1.0 rules quite well. > > The standing rules are that you don't incompatibly break APIs or wire > protocols in patch release. So, this patch violates the rule and > should have had a vote called before it was applied to branch-0.20. > (And arguably branch-0.21, although since it hasn't been released, it > isn't nearly the same level or problem. > > > 2) Is the above something we *should* be guaranteeing already? > > Patch releases: > 1. Must be backwards API compatible without a client recompile. > 2. Must be on the wire compatible. > > Exceptions require a vote of the committers. We should also put a > notice of any exceptions at the top of the release notes. > This is also my understanding of the current rules. For patch releases, the current pre-1.0 rules and the *proposed* post-1.0 rules in Hadoop-5071 are the same - no breakage of APIs or wire protocol in a patch release. --Apple-Mail-3-963344818-- From general-return-869-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 01:24:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83389 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 01:24:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 01:24:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 2471 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2380 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2370 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 01:24:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.6] (HELO exprod7og117.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:24:33 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.184]) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKS0PmO8CAt6SqjgYcdNGEh+8wP8Y7askn@postini.com; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:24:13 PST Received: by mail-iw0-f184.google.com with SMTP id 14so215922iwn.18 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:24:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.167.65 with SMTP id p1mr718860iby.20.1262741051475; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:24:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:24:11 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d3448dd1069f047c74cf6c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636d3448dd1069f047c74cf6c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Todd: After finishing some tasks I finally get back to HDFS testing. One question for your last reply to this thread: Are there any code examples close to your second and third recommendations? Or what APIs I should start with for my testing? Thanks. Xueling On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > In that case, I would recommend the following: > > 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > basically a set of entries like this: > > > > where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > > Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > -Todd > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > Hi Todd: > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is > > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into 24 > > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up > the > > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > > > Cheers, > > Xueling > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Hi Xueling, > >> > >> One important question that can really change the answer: > >> > >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > >> randomly very often? > >> > >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, > or > >> 10ms? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu > >> wrote: > >> > Hi there: > >> > > >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need > for > >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > >> > > >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > record > >> is > >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the > data > >> set. > >> > > >> > > >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > U2 > >> 0 0 > >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > >> > > >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we > are > >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > "position > >> of > >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > >> > > >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > accomplish > >> the > >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > Xueling > >> > > >> > > > --001636d3448dd1069f047c74cf6c-- From general-return-870-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 01:26:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84360 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 01:26:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 01:26:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 4196 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4105 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4095 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 01:26:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:26:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.28] (HELO exprod7og125.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:26:45 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.182]) by exprod7ob125.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKS0PmwI36fdldOwl11C6OocnGIWPGWx9C@postini.com; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:26:25 PST Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so12149731iwn.27 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:26:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.24.142 with SMTP id v14mr654636ibb.55.1262741184399; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:26:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:26:24 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f871001051726i1dc69f9fof71ac19d534a70ac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517741884bd4b86047c74d784 --001517741884bd4b86047c74d784 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Rephrase the sentence "Or what APIs I should start with for my testing?": I mean "What HDFS APIs I should start to look into for my testing? Thanks, Xueling On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Xueling Shu wrote: > Hi Todd: > > After finishing some tasks I finally get back to HDFS testing. > > One question for your last reply to this thread: Are there any code > examples close to your second and third recommendations? Or what APIs I > should start with for my testing? > > Thanks. > Xueling > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi Xueling, >> >> In that case, I would recommend the following: >> >> 1) Put all of your data on HDFS >> 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match >> 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - >> basically a set of entries like this: >> >> >> >> where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If >> you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 >> index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so >> 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. >> (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with >> 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) >> >> Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your >> in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely >> included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of >> entries following" column. The start and finish block will be >> partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that >> file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. >> >> Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu >> wrote: >> > Hi Todd: >> > >> > Thank you for your reply. >> > >> > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is >> > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done >> > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into >> 24 >> > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 >> > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up >> the >> > search then the product is what we are looking for. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Xueling >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Xueling, >> >> >> >> One important question that can really change the answer: >> >> >> >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in >> >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them >> >> randomly very often? >> >> >> >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, >> or >> >> 10ms? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -Todd >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi there: >> >> > >> >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need >> for >> >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) >> >> > >> >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each >> record >> >> is >> >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the >> data >> >> set. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC >> U2 >> >> 0 0 >> >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C >> >> > >> >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we >> are >> >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this >> "position >> >> of >> >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and >> >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. >> >> > >> >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to >> accomplish >> >> the >> >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks! >> >> > >> >> > Xueling >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > --001517741884bd4b86047c74d784-- From general-return-871-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 01:51:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96946 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 01:51:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 01:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 24882 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:51:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24812 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 01:51:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24801 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 01:51:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:51:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.wang.1900@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:51:18 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so15994207ewy.29 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:50:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QQzOetzRQknVLMtPaQvaFwpm+RVBJvS0a3dpHVZJLFE=; b=Hp79pOfI48WsIUIwZ8dhhf2L00O03w+s3/mALuNgj+OEgXr2m/QfibzO3iRRxts4i3 fTkjEPbf1WPTzIWFu+aHLPHwvVVPsDTAPRTuoeV3T0LeAXh1IxlvD6ncaJhPJpEnIV0l /if1a8aMNacSMWQCOJhwiQmYZSGhXDbKnsJ+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iEoaY4zpCGQHsxfH3Oo4u7lwCGjY1pqPvpDMe2ms5tPqBnhV4qLigi8lLCiRlCaMV1 syjhj6AGISgZzNl80cnf0O1JDchg7tFNMPkO6B6sWl0vajD4Myi71JPra4/fn8B9BW5e 0UPGr90lGwlCBow0Bvy0yUAd5F2KyRnBAS/fQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.5 with SMTP id x5mr1050444wee.75.1262742657213; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:50:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:50:57 +0800 Message-ID: <995905631001051750x4c2a538cpbd048c2599462e3a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Three questions about Hadoop From: Andrew Wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2d7b86a438047c752f3b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6db2d7b86a438047c752f3b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Annie, 2010/1/5 qin.wang > Hi team, > > > > When I try to do some research on Hadoop, I have several high level > questions, if any comments from you it will do great help for me: > > > > 1. Hadoop assumes the files are big files, but take Google as an example, > it > seems the google result for user are small files, so how to understand th= e > big files=A3=BFAnd what=A1=AFs the file content for example? > > I think the "big files" means very large file (bigger than 64MB). Hadoop use the HDFS as Distributed filesystem, the user log & web log etc are stored in HDFS, The engineers can use Hadoop to do analysis on the logs. Anyway, i don't know whether Google puts it's web pags in the distributed filesystem like this. > > 2. Why are the files write-once and read-many times? > > > As mentioned in last section, the logs are stored in HDFS, these log are write-once and alway used by engineers for severl times. > > 3. How to install other softwares on Hadoop, is there any special > requirements for the software? Do they need to support the Map/Reduce > module > and then can be installed? > > I just don't know what you mean, maybe you would like add additional jar which used in your application, if so, "distributed cache" in hadoop will help you. Good Luck! > > It will be very appreciated for your help. > > > > =CD=F5 =C7=D9 Annie.Wang > > > > =C9=CF=BA=A3=CA=D0=D0=EC=BB=E3=C7=F8=B9=F0=C1=D6=C2=B7418=BA=C57=BA=C5=C2= =A56=C2=A5 > Zip code: 200 233 > Tel: +86 21 5497 8666-8004 > Fax: +86 21 5497 7986 > Mobile: +86 137 6108 8369 > > > > --=20 http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ --0016e6db2d7b86a438047c752f3b-- From general-return-872-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 02:13:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5507 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 02:13:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 02:13:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 40304 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 02:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40218 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 02:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40208 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 02:13:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dashengju@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:13:20 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so11489695pwi.29 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:12:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=1bN3OX7unrLmG6ah4nk7t3mQ+XZ/LmaUBQXZCTpz/7o=; b=tAjTgc1a33O7AD8VsGmBwmlwIGLRW5wf/K78h8Tq6goe/w26t2/Ec6V0i7enuWvcVr PFjrKMfxBexlIAbzZQJv5EC9vLVYHYbXPHqY2lG8X2rAJ5ElrbI+wGdVFtFZJ7nnemwz GOrbmnlkEuUT+1urp+3viTn6iGRodBXwQzw3w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Ox7P4jTbGdsM6FKq0yH5L9aBGyRjkkPn4GehWG641GeZx1SzGeuXD3iT8aKM8tTVRX vt6kBo6c6lWFsFrusWYVNW0fk4gfwH1xyIquwrjBedxKnojAMaJZ15E9XXOYF1al6m+R 680nJTe5+KHm3WmZkhc8FXRImXaETzjO7vKBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.209.20 with SMTP id h20mr924806wfg.130.1262743979639; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:12:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:12:59 +0800 Message-ID: <1e45bf881001051812h3907c6c0w52aeae27197c1c92@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re:Three questions about Hadoop From: =?UTF-8?B?6Z6g5aSn5Y2H?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32e2e594654047c757e76 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd32e2e594654047c757e76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1. At the client side, one user's files are small files; but at the server side, they will not put one user's file as a sperate file, usually they put the same type content together, like a database. For example, the webpages crawled from Internet are small pages, but they put them together as large webpage data warehouse. 2. "write-once and read-many times" is usually a charactor for data warehouse. The webpages crawled from Internet are written to hadoop data warehouse once, then they use those data to do many other analyse, read man= y times by different applications. Not all your data is "write-once and read-many times". 3. I do not know. ----------------------------------- dashengju +86 13810875910 dashengju@gmail.com ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "qin.wang"; Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2010 05:42 PM To: "general"; Subject: Three questions about Hadoop Hi team, When I try to do some research on Hadoop, I have several high level questions, if any comments from you it will do great help for me: 1. Hadoop assumes the files are big files, but take Google as an example, i= t seems the google result for user are small files, so how to understand the big files=A3=BFAnd what=A1=AFs the file content for example? 2. Why are the files write-once and read-many times? 3. How to install other softwares on Hadoop, is there any special requirements for the software? Do they need to support the Map/Reduce modul= e and then can be installed? It will be very appreciated for your help. =CD=F5 =C7=D9 Annie.Wang =C9=CF=BA=A3=CA=D0=D0=EC=BB=E3=C7=F8=B9=F0=C1=D6=C2=B7418=BA=C57=BA=C5=C2= =A56=C2=A5 Zip code: 200 233 Tel: +86 21 5497 8666-8004 Fax: +86 21 5497 7986 Mobile: +86 137 6108 8369 --000e0cd32e2e594654047c757e76-- From general-return-873-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 16:10:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74111 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 16:10:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 16:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 46399 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 16:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46313 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 16:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46303 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 16:10:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:10:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:10:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 73874 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 16:10:19 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.102]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:10:19 +0000 Message-ID: <4B44B5E9.3010004@apache.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:10:17 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > Correction. Pre-1.0, the 0.N to 0.N+1 is a major upgrade. After 1.0, 1.N > to 1.N+1 is a minor. In both cases, X.Y.z to X.Y.z+1 is a patch release. > > I thought we had it documented somewhere, but can't find it. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap Doug From general-return-874-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:23:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34147 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:23:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:23:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 75166 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:23:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75089 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75079 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:23:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:23:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:23:37 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so16005179yxe.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:23:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=du9/FpyPxgdYd2JhoWcBRgHjyd74OJMMeu3vs6gT0/o=; b=NMYvwXmkFe/OL/EEB0rDyNxk/Jfpq80aVnTIpuNHac8OHFNbGzKRv6MK9YT4TD2gjB 8b7T0dtpHGqHaorZfoU3n+2vfAFpZmofnKGXiQdt/9TfcNXWmD3D7mWPzr64rV9v8OvV J5hQfBlmPXe35jpXJIncW2EDqOChlRipYuvng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZmHFMCiaiC/UGtzBZ9wtQMWrr1SFxp5KRiT6i5iUZPJJu59Yio3VWaxvi8X25L744I YWZC5caMMm+B45YrzaUaOCNQ6j0P6EOFgNnMt53y5dxr2bNYrK+Di6W/J/yT6jtzymlh Xj+ZpBo9j4oBgGh9dW4WCu+lJfhJ9ryLT0UoM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.91.159.2 with SMTP id l2mr1187990ago.73.1262802196850; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:23:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B44B5E9.3010004@apache.org> References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <4B44B5E9.3010004@apache.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:23:16 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b0fc03bc8e5faa0e Message-ID: <31a243e71001061023t5ed5d245gb08c26dd51204c64@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From the HBase point of view, we would want to include hadoop 0.20.2-dev in hbase 0.20.3 specifically for HDFS-101 (127 would also be nice since we could stop patching the jar we distribute). We also share the same rules as hadoop and we don't want to break compatibility between point releases (we try). Our best case scenario would be to have a 0.20 backward compatible 0.20.2 release with HDFS-101 included. Else, we will just stick with 0.20.1 J-D On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> Correction. Pre-1.0, the 0.N to 0.N+1 is a major upgrade. After 1.0, 1.N >> to 1.N+1 is a minor. In both cases, X.Y.z to X.Y.z+1 is a patch release. >> >> I thought we had it documented somewhere, but can't find it. > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap > > Doug > From general-return-875-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:27:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36095 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:27:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:27:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 79913 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79860 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79850 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.16] (HELO QMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:27:01 +0000 Received: from OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by QMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SEc81d0051GXsucA1JSiGr; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:26:42 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SJSZ1d0092SbwD58TJSceS; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:26:40 +0000 Message-Id: <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-1027351070 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:26:32 -0800 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-1-1027351070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hairong was having difficulty getting this message through the spam filters. -- Owen ----------------Start of the message: > I would like Hairong to consider if she could fix the issue in 0.20 > without the incompatible change. It is possible that I fix the issue in 0.20 without breaking the compatibility. But I am worried about the code stability if we take this approach. The pipeline code is such a critical and fragile part of HDFS. Currently I depend on the extensive pipeline fault injection tests created in 0.21 to build the confidence that my change works. If the change in 0.20 differs from that in 0.21 and the trunk, it becomes harder for us to ensure the pipeline code stability. I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from 0.20. Hairong --Apple-Mail-1-1027351070-- From general-return-876-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42078 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 89895 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89809 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89798 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:31:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:48 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so16013008yxe.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VL0DhsR7LYkiPrDsHGeMbA4FbIZBysf8s53Oxs3JMnc=; b=BT6lBtlgwKvoFkiLg02pqnhdAB2RBr/ZAmMxVHlyC6rAjvjxnVefN4Xcl4ne8LxvCe Lvlaf2gIWCX8WR8b9nbO8VoFwCzNycVuRgkjYbn04XWk+RSmfk4r6miFRd42/6EOdXdG /vwLggHY9MNkDpM4WvMg0oyCZ7RI6fJvhBTwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lGu+TEPmKmcShOLP/lnvovKgzHTkWyE0C2ZiAvT8BcOmT5dHLDLBh46GqTrYE2r5s3 iQ3Hk8dfoWYUkxnhW4qQFuMH+FBrjeBl3W4fKezmggrKjBfRYv7Go/F1Y9mhcHdBoK4q 9hlhEEMxFtBM/acyK+rwl6o5uZ+KDP2yVcAaY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.17.37 with SMTP id 37mr40284665ybq.285.1262802687470; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:31:27 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944 --000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from 0.20. +1 to pulling it out. This code is very tricky and is dangerous to change in a minor release. thanks, dhruba --000e0cd757e29baca8047c832944-- From general-return-877-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:33:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42829 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:33:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:33:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 92126 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:33:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92031 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92016 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:33:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:33:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.17] (HELO QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:33:40 +0000 Received: from OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by QMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SDXC1d0050QkzPwAAJZLuj; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:33:20 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SJZA1d00H2SbwD58NJZD8w; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:33:17 +0000 Message-Id: <9D379087-F473-4D79-A6A0-B278DA04F9F7@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:33:09 -0800 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 6, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >> I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from >> 0.20. > > +1 to pulling it out. This code is very tricky and is dangerous to > change in > a minor release. +1 to pulling it out. -- Owen From general-return-878-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:42:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53736 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:42:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:42:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 10049 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9998 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9970 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.187] (HELO mail-yw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.211.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:42:44 +0000 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so19776674ywh.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:42:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hrUKsttG/QtaoBaGhEXvayTN+1m8/mxQKSPE/Ms2Xgo=; b=E0eNP3cYGY8ku91ReVC4UwtpCJlnYRih7gA2gzi72fsSJZiGorEvEool3AYkwAGmlX ZtYOAwXCiovSSeoIVn1VjAIx4uBJL6B0btA6aNYS3HIHWH51pWTaOUrPFUS7/158sv93 GFUKgpfYgan6Tea3JULFOZn7P24K7ubqJATCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=Z+d8SkPJJ4mPHHtl11D1OTf9Me/aDIMRRXIJoiQ5KtR6SFRNXzGGJiAQSp5J2WYS9e Wy7Bx3Jrbh+h0wAk2RViHFJUzXRVBPMpUVirTxM34r6IqHmiSGcDPwkRYMFDd0kGgNnU isWbh8gwXCeW4CbpllnG5x5KYxmDHYT6kMybo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.91.162.31 with SMTP id p31mr4707495ago.121.1262803343412; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:42:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:42:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fc42fb98a01010be Message-ID: <31a243e71001061042t5da19229ha9ce7ae52868a2d6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: SF HBase User Group Meetup Jan. 27th @ StumbleUpon From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, This year's first San Francisco HBase User Group meetup takes place on January 27th at StumbleUpon. The first talk will be about the upcoming versions, others to be announced. RSVP at: http://su.pr/6Cldz7 See you there! J-D From general-return-879-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 18:55:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57648 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 18:55:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 18:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28188 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:55:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28109 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 18:55:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28099 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 18:55:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:55:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:55:06 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so12735092pxi.5 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:54:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.8.34 with SMTP id 34mr16708186wfh.103.1262804082128; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:54:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> <4aa34eb71001061031m56cf9065q586380342b81a5d1@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:54:22 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001061054v5198e2f2haa766032e824ca48@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b146bc7682047c837c9c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502b146bc7682047c837c9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from 0.20. > > +1 to pulling it out. This code is very tricky and is dangerous to change > in > a minor release. > > -0 to pulling it out - I agree that it's very tricky, but I think HDFS-101 is a pretty big bug to knowingly leave in. In my experience this has been the singular cause behind a lot of HDFS write problems when a cluster has a couple of "bad egg" nodes. Given the number of times 0.21 has been pushed back, I think the majority of users will be on 0.20 for some time to come, so I'd love it to be free of known issues like this. As for testing, I'm happy to devote time to testing an alternate version of HDFS-101 that doesn't break compatibility - I can reproduce that bug reliably. That said, Hairong's opinion should carry a lot of weight, and if she thinks it's too risky, I'm totally willing to agree. -Todd --00504502b146bc7682047c837c9c-- From general-return-880-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 19:33:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67804 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 19:33:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 19:33:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 71443 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 19:33:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71371 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 19:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71361 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 19:33:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:33:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:33:18 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so12770809pxi.5 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:32:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.121.30 with SMTP id t30mr2082694wfc.283.1262806378146; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:32:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28902f871001051726i1dc69f9fof71ac19d534a70ac@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001051726i1dc69f9fof71ac19d534a70ac@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:32:38 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001061132p65fde705te5957d679075de3f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e904c696ec5c047c840569 --001636e904c696ec5c047c840569 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Xueling, Here's a general outline: My guess is that your "position of match" field is bounded (perhaps by the number of base pairs in the human genome?) Given this, you can probably write a very simple Partitioner implementation that divides this field into ranges, each with an approximately equal number of records. Next, write a simple MR job which takes in a line of data, and outputs the same line, but with the position-of-match as the key. This will get partitioned by the above function, so you end up with each reducer receiving all of the records in a given range. In the reducer, simply output every 1000th position into your "sparse" output file (along with the non-sparse output file offset), and every position into the non-sparse output file. In your realtime query server (not part of Hadoop), load the "sparse" file into RAM and perform binary search, etc - find the "bins" which the range endpoints land in, and then open the non-sparse output on HDFS to finish the count. Hope that helps. Thanks -Todd On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Xueling Shu wrote: > Rephrase the sentence "Or what APIs I should start with for my testing?": I > mean "What HDFS APIs I should start to look into for my testing? > > Thanks, > Xueling > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > > Hi Todd: > > > > After finishing some tasks I finally get back to HDFS testing. > > > > One question for your last reply to this thread: Are there any code > > examples close to your second and third recommendations? Or what APIs I > > should start with for my testing? > > > > Thanks. > > Xueling > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Hi Xueling, > >> > >> In that case, I would recommend the following: > >> > >> 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > >> 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > >> 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > >> basically a set of entries like this: > >> > >> > >> > >> where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > >> you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > >> index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > >> 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > >> (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > >> 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > >> > >> Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > >> in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > >> included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > >> entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > >> partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > >> file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > >> > >> Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Todd: > >> > > >> > Thank you for your reply. > >> > > >> > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set > is > >> > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > >> > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into > >> 24 > >> > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > >> > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed > up > >> the > >> > search then the product is what we are looking for. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Xueling > >> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Xueling, > >> >> > >> >> One important question that can really change the answer: > >> >> > >> >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > >> >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > >> >> randomly very often? > >> >> > >> >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 > second, > >> or > >> >> 10ms? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> -Todd > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu < > xshu@systemsbiology.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi there: > >> >> > > >> >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need > >> for > >> >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > >> >> > > >> >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > >> record > >> >> is > >> >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the > >> data > >> >> set. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 > TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > >> U2 > >> >> 0 0 > >> >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > >> >> > > >> >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query > we > >> are > >> >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > >> "position > >> >> of > >> >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > >> >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > >> >> > > >> >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > >> accomplish > >> >> the > >> >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks! > >> >> > > >> >> > Xueling > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > > --001636e904c696ec5c047c840569-- From general-return-881-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 19:41:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69874 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 19:41:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 19:41:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 81673 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 19:41:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81594 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 19:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81584 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 19:41:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:41:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.159] (HELO exprod7og103.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:41:25 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.195]) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKS0TnTw/d8jRVIf9E14QeueWJwZHvK6GR@postini.com; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:41:04 PST Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so4332234iwn.29 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:41:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.14 with SMTP id b14mr912623ibz.26.1262806862704; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:41:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001061132p65fde705te5957d679075de3f@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001051726i1dc69f9fof71ac19d534a70ac@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71001061132p65fde705te5957d679075de3f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:41:02 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f871001061141t28f26a37x120357eb90397fdb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34a9b78b021047c8422d8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636d34a9b78b021047c8422d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the information! I will start to try. Xueling On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > Here's a general outline: > > My guess is that your "position of match" field is bounded (perhaps by the > number of base pairs in the human genome?) Given this, you can probably > write a very simple Partitioner implementation that divides this field into > ranges, each with an approximately equal number of records. > > Next, write a simple MR job which takes in a line of data, and outputs the > same line, but with the position-of-match as the key. This will get > partitioned by the above function, so you end up with each reducer > receiving > all of the records in a given range. > > In the reducer, simply output every 1000th position into your "sparse" > output file (along with the non-sparse output file offset), and every > position into the non-sparse output file. > > In your realtime query server (not part of Hadoop), load the "sparse" file > into RAM and perform binary search, etc - find the "bins" which the range > endpoints land in, and then open the non-sparse output on HDFS to finish > the > count. > > Hope that helps. > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > > Rephrase the sentence "Or what APIs I should start with for my testing?": > I > > mean "What HDFS APIs I should start to look into for my testing? > > > > Thanks, > > Xueling > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Xueling Shu > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Todd: > > > > > > After finishing some tasks I finally get back to HDFS testing. > > > > > > One question for your last reply to this thread: Are there any code > > > examples close to your second and third recommendations? Or what APIs I > > > should start with for my testing? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Xueling > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Xueling, > > >> > > >> In that case, I would recommend the following: > > >> > > >> 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > > >> 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > > >> 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > > >> basically a set of entries like this: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > > >> you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > > >> index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > > >> 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > > >> (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > > >> 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > >> > > >> Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > > >> in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > > >> included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > > >> entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > > >> partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > > >> file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > > >> > > >> Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > >> > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu < > xshu@systemsbiology.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi Todd: > > >> > > > >> > Thank you for your reply. > > >> > > > >> > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set > > is > > >> > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have > done > > >> > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered > into > > >> 24 > > >> > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > > >> > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed > > up > > >> the > > >> > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Xueling > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi Xueling, > > >> >> > > >> >> One important question that can really change the answer: > > >> >> > > >> >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > > >> >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > > >> >> randomly very often? > > >> >> > > >> >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 > > second, > > >> or > > >> >> 10ms? > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks > > >> >> -Todd > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu < > > xshu@systemsbiology.org> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > Hi there: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our > need > > >> for > > >> >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per > set) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > > >> record > > >> >> is > > >> >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in > the > > >> data > > >> >> set. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 > > TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > > >> U2 > > >> >> 0 0 > > >> >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query > > we > > >> are > > >> >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > > >> "position > > >> >> of > > >> >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 > and > > >> >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > > >> accomplish > > >> >> the > > >> >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Thanks! > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Xueling > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --001636d34a9b78b021047c8422d8-- From general-return-882-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 20:00:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76131 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 20:00:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 20:00:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 7720 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 20:00:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7657 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 20:00:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7646 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 20:00:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:00:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:00:25 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=aI3ufoWcXueaEKJ3+7ytKSITDczEu2imcSiE/F/BwkDoXM8YaoUL+Lpq 4gfuRCH7ZqjXsXJM99f0w1mrWAjoONaod6I108pmefZ+DdLb365sAaeb6 umHtTWmni6FMTj7; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1262808025; x=1294344025; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=200.20.2=20HDFS=20incompatible=20with=200 .20.1|Date:=20Wed,=2006=20Jan=202010=2012:00:02=20-0800 |Message-ID:=20 |To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0 |Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<45f85f 71001061054v5198e2f2haa766032e824ca48@mail.gmail.com>; bh=iT8z53evzSavynSf3rMZEAT/Se5I6SZUiYafc3XpWww=; b=tdbuHRUFshQvObiODY5w5qv2bG4yf/MCRefYnd4e2nbJeRwKJfM2Dmvf i9dB2J4KNt5rBMMXPt7xvSihEyjlVVkBFkWSdrGGdb/Mq/xfCxU181p6x P4Qzl4M3wtY40sQ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,230,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="10562580" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:00:04 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:00:02 -0800 Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Thread-Index: AcqPCtUIWOGPlr6h70OtUNBEuKm57g== In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001061054v5198e2f2haa766032e824ca48@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/6/10 10:54 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > -0 to pulling it out - I agree that it's very tricky, but I think HDFS-101 > is a pretty big bug to knowingly leave in. In my experience this has been > the singular cause behind a lot of HDFS write problems when a cluster has a > couple of "bad egg" nodes. > > Given the number of times 0.21 has been pushed back, I think the majority of > users will be on 0.20 for some time to come, so I'd love it to be free of > known issues like this. Due to exactly this problem (0.21 taking 4-ev-er... I think we should hold a 1-yr old birthday party for 0.20 at the appropriate HUGs), I'd like to have a working 0.20. I'm sure I'm not the only one willing to forgo back-compat, but with a caveat: The fact that an upgrade requirement needs to be obvious. Can we change the message of "protocol violation" or whatever it is to add "Perhaps you need to upgrade your client?" or something? From general-return-883-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 20:04:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77084 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 20:04:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 20:04:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10988 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 20:04:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10904 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 20:04:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10894 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 20:04:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:04:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.72] (HELO mailout03.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:04:38 +0000 Received: from mailint03 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout03 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C4911643B for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:04:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint03 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F9511636F for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:04:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:04:18 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03469FCB@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? Thread-Index: AcqPCERS3vDThaXlTGSsLtgXKGtq4gAApBwn References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com><45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com><28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com><45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com><28902f871001051724q24d3b173r2a5977d0fa7ab43@mail.gmail.com><28902f871001051726i1dc69f9fof71ac19d534a70ac@mail.gmail.com><45f85f71001061132p65fde705te5957d679075de3f@mail.gmail.com> <28902f871001061141t28f26a37x120357eb90397fdb@mail.gmail.com> From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2010 20:04:18.0140 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DB3E9C0:01CA8F0B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Isn't this what Hadoop Hbase is supposed to do? The partioning M/R = implementation - "sharding" in street - is the sideways scaling that = Hbase is designed to excel at! Also the indexed hbase flavour could = allow very fast ad-hoc queries for Xueling using the new yet familiar = HBQL sql-dialect? Sorry, my 10 pence worth! -----Original Message----- From: Xueling Shu [mailto:xshu@systemsbiology.org] Sent: Wed 1/6/2010 8:41 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query = on a large data set? =20 Thanks for the information! I will start to try. Xueling On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > Here's a general outline: > > My guess is that your "position of match" field is bounded (perhaps by = the > number of base pairs in the human genome?) Given this, you can = probably > write a very simple Partitioner implementation that divides this field = into > ranges, each with an approximately equal number of records. > > Next, write a simple MR job which takes in a line of data, and outputs = the > same line, but with the position-of-match as the key. This will get > partitioned by the above function, so you end up with each reducer > receiving > all of the records in a given range. > > In the reducer, simply output every 1000th position into your "sparse" > output file (along with the non-sparse output file offset), and every > position into the non-sparse output file. > > In your realtime query server (not part of Hadoop), load the "sparse" = file > into RAM and perform binary search, etc - find the "bins" which the = range > endpoints land in, and then open the non-sparse output on HDFS to = finish > the > count. > > Hope that helps. > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > > Rephrase the sentence "Or what APIs I should start with for my = testing?": > I > > mean "What HDFS APIs I should start to look into for my testing? > > > > Thanks, > > Xueling > > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Xueling Shu = > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Todd: > > > > > > After finishing some tasks I finally get back to HDFS testing. > > > > > > One question for your last reply to this thread: Are there any = code > > > examples close to your second and third recommendations? Or what = APIs I > > > should start with for my testing? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Xueling > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Xueling, > > >> > > >> In that case, I would recommend the following: > > >> > > >> 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > > >> 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > > >> 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" = - > > >> basically a set of entries like this: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or = so. If > > >> you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean = 100,000 > > >> index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, = so > > >> 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into = memory. > > >> (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up = with > > >> 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > >> > > >> Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > > >> in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be = completely > > >> included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number = of > > >> entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > > >> partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load = that > > >> file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the = count. > > >> > > >> Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > >> > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu < > xshu@systemsbiology.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi Todd: > > >> > > > >> > Thank you for your reply. > > >> > > > >> > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a = data set > > is > > >> > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we = have > done > > >> > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly = scattered > into > > >> 24 > > >> > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table = (400,000,000 > > >> > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can = speed > > up > > >> the > > >> > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > Xueling > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon = > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Hi Xueling, > > >> >> > > >> >> One important question that can really change the answer: > > >> >> > > >> >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged = in in > > >> >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update = them > > >> >> randomly very often? > > >> >> > > >> >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 > > second, > > >> or > > >> >> 10ms? > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks > > >> >> -Todd > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu < > > xshu@systemsbiology.org> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > Hi there: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits = our > need > > >> for > > >> >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records = per > set) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. = Each > > >> record > > >> >> is > > >> >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record = in > the > > >> data > > >> >> set. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 > > TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > > >> U2 > > >> >> 0 0 > > >> >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the = query > > we > > >> are > > >> >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of = this > > >> "position > > >> >> of > > >> >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > = 200 > and > > >> >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > > >> accomplish > > >> >> the > > >> >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Thanks! > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Xueling > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > From general-return-884-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 06 21:38:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5011 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 21:38:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 21:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 38048 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37968 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37958 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:38:01 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o06Lap6x033526 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:36:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=iAQYdh2H4F1tYXai0KQLLrI+zcRR67Ui68taUOnoWzsyU+FCr0P8SlL99ESeByXN Message-Id: <58EECB55-3433-443A-A186-83B3E773C5DA@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.20.2 HDFS incompatible with 0.20.1 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:36:50 -0800 References: <45f85f71001051129i176c7638ud173ceb82e6b61b8@mail.gmail.com> <8C97CCB1-3EA9-4A8C-9887-2CF4108E347D@apache.org> <80AB0612-128B-4C3D-8873-3E7CA072FA81@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > > ----------------Start of the message: > > I would like Hairong to consider if she could fix the issue in 0.20 > > without the incompatible change. > > It is possible that I fix the issue in 0.20 without breaking the > compatibility. But I am worried about the code stability if we take > this approach. The pipeline code is such a critical and fragile part > of HDFS. Currently I depend on the extensive pipeline fault > injection tests created in 0.21 to build the confidence that my > change works. If the change in 0.20 differs from that in 0.21 and > the trunk, it becomes harder for us to ensure the pipeline code > stability. > > I would like to propose that we pull out HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 from > 0.20. > > Hairong +1 to pull it out. This part of the code is trick to get right and test. sanjay From general-return-885-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 07 16:59:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53819 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2010 16:59:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2010 16:59:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5254 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2010 16:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5194 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2010 16:59:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5818 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2010 13:46:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sriramc@ivycomptech.com designates 203.153.210.130 as permitted sender) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4073 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hbase loading error -- Trailer 'header' is wrong; does the trailer size match content Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:19:55 +0530 Message-ID: <49A7BA114AAC6A48B9C44CB06B7B987E089AFCD7@HYDSVWIN004X.ivycomptech.partygaming.local> In-Reply-To: <31a243e71001061042t5da19229ha9ce7ae52868a2d6@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hbase loading error -- Trailer 'header' is wrong; does the trailer size match content thread-index: AcqPACQoCNXoT5PcRse71LxjBUltEQAnpBjg References: <31a243e71001061042t5da19229ha9ce7ae52868a2d6@mail.gmail.com> From: "Sriram Muthuswamy Chittathoor" To: ,, CC: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2010 13:46:03.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[C142E840:01CA8F9F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi: I am trying to run a MR job to output HFiles directly containing 10 million records (very simple 1 column family and very small). The job completes with some mention about killed jobs (reduce Failed/Killed Task Attempts > 0) . Then I use the script loadtable.rb to load my hfiles into hbase and get the error stack given below.=20 I tried all combinations of settings in the mapred-site.xml. Also tried the suggestions given in this chain which talks about similar problem. http://www.mail-archive.com/hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg07668.html If I reduce the number of records it works. =20 Thanks for any help Sriram C org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFile.java:1335:in `deserialize': java.io.IOException: Trailer 'header' is wrong; does the trailer size match content? (NativeException) from org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFile.java:813:in `readTrailer' from org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/hfile/HFile.java:758:in `loadFileInfo' from sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2:in `invoke0' from sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39:in `invoke' from sun/reflect/DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25:in `invoke' from java/lang/reflect/Method.java:597:in `invoke' from org/jruby/javasupport/JavaMethod.java:298:in `invokeWithExceptionHandling' from org/jruby/javasupport/JavaMethod.java:259:in `invoke' ... 19 levels... from org/jruby/Main.java:94:in `main' from bin/loadtable.rb:83:in `each' from bin/loadtable.rb:83 Complete Java stackTrace java.io.IOException: Trailer 'header' is wrong; does the trailer size match content? at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$FixedFileTrailer.deserialize(HFil e.java:1335) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$Reader.readTrailer(HFile.java:813 ) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$Reader.loadFileInfo(HFile.java:75 8) This email is sent for and on behalf of Ivy Comptech Private Limited. = Ivy Comptech Private Limited is a limited liability company. =20 This email and any attachments are confidential, and may be legally = privileged and protected by copyright. If you are not the intended = recipient dissemination or copying of this email is prohibited. If you = have received this in error, please notify the sender by replying by = email and then delete the email completely from your system.=20 Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender. This = communication is not intended to form a binding contract on behalf of = Ivy Comptech Private Limited unless expressly indicated to the contrary = and properly authorised. Any actions taken on the basis of this email = are at the recipient's own risk. Registered office: Ivy Comptech Private Limited, Cyber Spazio, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, = Hyderabad 500 033, Andhra Pradesh, India. Registered number: 37994. = Registered in India. A list of members' names is available for = inspection at the registered office. From general-return-886-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 08 23:25:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76436 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2010 23:25:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2010 23:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17208 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:25:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:25:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17128 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2010 23:25:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:25:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:24:59 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so6506625fgg.11 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:24:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lUtaqKfujsX9rhVWnQnRL/tZKr9eyezC/39DqnhS7K8=; b=tJR1WFwuFSUfw8BrSCAt23wjVY/NDbnXPOb7af0x65dtLlVtA0ImK6gJJMJcz0496b 9JeYe1iDsKx9K7fbbuirfOJ3eE/rCYGCTyPNEZrrjNqjDQj8FsTuB2X0yXV+eoP+xyt3 eHwb7R26xQO4FmUerZZLtuHfQlTx2xPCos08A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NLJ1MytBYGD1fPuuy79F7qmmN13gnOSG7JWb5LwhyaUifbrDBZprDOXfksI4G5FUP2 SYP4AZV1eoGqKv3ZJ8vMquF58P69nkGHhdD8kIgFTlk6iF3LGVfQ37EsJE42tf9yKUTE QzO+MBltcvvBpKRPXJiSE/b+CIRe6CSMQMe7g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.126.21 with SMTP id d21mr4337265mun.24.1262993077641; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:24:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:24:37 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001081524t45faa45vf54640e503d67b5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: QUESTION ABOUT PARTITIONERS From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65c8d40bf22f9047caf7d54 --0016e65c8d40bf22f9047caf7d54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! First of all, happy new year to all community!. I=B4m actually developing an Map-Reduce approach to genetic algorithms, and I was questioning the use and effectivity of Partitioners in the Map-Reduce flow. I=B4ve been working in pseudo-distributed mode and didn=B4t find any exampl= e of usage of Partitioner classes. Does this mean that using another Partitioner -not the default one- have sense only on a Fully Distributed environment? Which Partitioner should I implement with my GA approach? Thanks a lot in advance! --=20 Alberto --0016e65c8d40bf22f9047caf7d54-- From general-return-887-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 08 23:28:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77190 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2010 23:28:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2010 23:28:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 20923 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:28:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20849 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20839 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2010 23:28:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:28:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:27:53 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so14509615pxi.5 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:27:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MLt0d1mMPVvy8DcY1ACgazbtYjcgGfxmOiLrgs6jk94=; b=EU4g9aeLFf0VZ62qnh8ySXnxMxi4czmsS8mhPaN2+0UjKmQG9OlTqwfN2uBxwsN1GW UFv7ENW6ECFkS/vIXlewf1HGfwXAjQ70LiJ911DJCKJvWfN2mFgJuWU2bDOdJrpSyTx8 EXE5pLs+Sk4pJox6aIHyb+ZBuiPIu2Ann91tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iKtwXr3mT17m1iXiKHS3dcRAZ4Y5xP6n6UWjMpOXIZO7FjkfPTN0hKGENvzLjg8V3/ x5iqe08MHhNj1wZ5DsEajPBwX7d60AhPJENuIQiaqUXeW5GpNQJgfltvtbtpre3r0nBQ +LtDkzPeTs3dUFFnete7p+A2DOp2shA/DNlmw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.20.36 with SMTP id x36mr1629804wfi.231.1262993251253; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:27:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:27:31 -0800 Message-ID: <17e273101001081527y67aaff5dj86da8478dbb78950@mail.gmail.com> Subject: last call to map() From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e1f95d184044047caf88f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e1f95d184044047caf88f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, My mapper calls remote client to retrieve certain result. I plan to introduce asynchronous client calls and buffer results in mapper before calling output.collect(). Is there a way to detect whether the current call to MapClass.map() is the last one ? Thanks --001636e1f95d184044047caf88f9-- From general-return-888-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 08 23:32:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78062 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2010 23:32:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2010 23:32:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 23008 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22922 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2010 23:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22898 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2010 23:32:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:32:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:31:59 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o08NVYZj043543; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:31:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=drnWe3feuVP/fOYVJ67RGeQ/pbOAoHJ3PCk0uuYyxgLplWwkG2nn6MfZ/0Ku7QMR Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <3B3421D1-AF67-405C-BC55-AAD79B45BA53@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <17e273101001081527y67aaff5dj86da8478dbb78950@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: last call to map() Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:31:34 -0800 References: <17e273101001081527y67aaff5dj86da8478dbb78950@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Moving to mapreduce-user@ Use the 'close' api. Arun On Jan 8, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Hi, > My mapper calls remote client to retrieve certain result. > > I plan to introduce asynchronous client calls and buffer results in > mapper > before calling output.collect(). > > Is there a way to detect whether the current call to MapClass.map() > is the > last one ? > > Thanks From general-return-889-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 09 00:47:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 645 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2010 00:47:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2010 00:47:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 69490 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 00:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69406 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 00:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69396 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2010 00:47:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:47:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:47:26 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so18227708fxm.29 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:47:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dLsTRTsxwyG+sNQnkhUTbXgy/u0UsqgFFqiIKfg7fkg=; b=Jsf7iy4ktCgCZ2vIvodGUOYbjUr5ofFC1QQIYtZGL3ldpEen9EPibE91Cj/MBEsLrc /mcAQYhLDjyhYoGA2FZ7yzqzLsJgEZ55DUwqmn//ICF4r2pAem9WpZ7T/RUdDcR1ClNU bTxT9PNLpuF2meVf2Lc+Quet6rof9h3y3GPus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=F75E2NQh6sIoj14woSlcEgd6Z8zSJ/HmjydDDjvk5olUTEAJY3nvKp4ok8k0wjQJ2L N3S6MKfCCDlQQRGJt3cL0E6AEEKUGVVjIeWXRDhKBc10ldTcsf+8XxOVQfCCVLVI2a/I XmICV8RAivquTlaTSwRP+nKiLvLl9LHUHEdUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.81 with SMTP id t17mr2000436hbg.24.1262998023978; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:47:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d01001081524t45faa45vf54640e503d67b5@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001081524t45faa45vf54640e503d67b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:47:03 -0600 Message-ID: <3c682ecd1001081647x14d68f76h9d4eda3ef3502d4c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: QUESTION ABOUT PARTITIONERS From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7c4c4923e28047cb0a4be --001485f7c4c4923e28047cb0a4be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alberto, You should be able to override the default partitioner class in pseudo distributed and the fully distributed mode. I used the same technique for the paper "Scaling Genetic Algorithms using MapReduce" [ http://verma7.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ISDA09_MR_GA.pdf] that you might find useful. -Abhishek. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas wrote: > Hi everyone! First of all, happy new year to all community!. I=B4m actual= ly > developing an Map-Reduce approach to genetic algorithms, and I was > questioning the use and effectivity of Partitioners in the Map-Reduce flo= w. > I=B4ve been working in pseudo-distributed mode and didn=B4t find any exam= ple of > usage of Partitioner classes. Does this mean that using another Partition= er > -not the default one- have sense only on a Fully Distributed environment? > Which Partitioner should I implement with my GA approach? > Thanks a lot in advance! > > -- > Alberto > --001485f7c4c4923e28047cb0a4be-- From general-return-890-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 09 19:34:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7257 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2010 19:34:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2010 19:34:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 36583 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 19:34:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36494 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 19:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36483 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2010 19:34:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.wang.1900@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.212] (HELO mail-ew0-f212.google.com) (209.85.219.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:34:29 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so21745833ewy.12 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:34:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MdnBbErf1gCsV2fOzM0ejhZf3k6b7BivT8Mn4SHUKuM=; b=mhWQ4nBFo7w6VoqMrsiyMtB1+zmuXQV/uPiJXl0hx4u4Z1kzJIJxfVVgBfCDdm3z+r shXSYcZwulp6EK4MOq+hAC/YwGvzKtffswKl6Q0Ioxezj6baX9n9vgkbROCfwWwhjA2X rCh7r9z5kxdiPeC7XpilYXiWs0nks9z9KKx8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hNn7nPdK/GsPBf0X4g1cNWM5MovoaEmJRt1OgrDtF4tADsnmNOraudGPmV9uYMkgAx GDRjci4xiQRg61W/pIMYLh3oEhdpqAl+t9DDPuvzv7e/zFb9nRWUfOxFuLNMHGVRVwVx sey89DfEvU9oj6dwOK++y3UaSATMJlKUl3hR8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.14 with SMTP id v14mr1062035wee.183.1263065648489; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:34:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:34:08 +0800 Message-ID: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Andrew Wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7eb684e6519047cc0638f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7eb684e6519047cc0638f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, you guys I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project. I find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to know what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translating one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and chapter6. The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think this job/work will be useful or helpful? I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! -- http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ --0016e6d7eb684e6519047cc0638f-- From general-return-891-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 09 21:46:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35454 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2010 21:46:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2010 21:46:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 18131 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 21:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18041 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2010 21:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18031 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2010 21:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:46:21 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so18678345fxm.29 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:46:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVZhZEgigDs0BuIZunDn3amHynMsewOd+aJjZ40VKlo=; b=Kci0015HNWoRrewSWRTb1Gr4w46FswNvAqKqXvsI7CzIuBeg9LiXvayAhxOwd+fMHe Gl1xsI4itkKWynewTjPV5IpbTkMgGZcj345vrP+GqORxkPkRd8XCm6JjV9cf5ZWqyUe4 lOm9c5kSOKSEcTa6foXjacDb6UGxNuXT5pmJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P+BHQ/tI9vVQH5EqHAcyQpHTxR7uvXtuco/VJjbhpwR1yn02I6EN4Ee3zy9ebz/iPB 5BlG9YBtJ78FJT7ymTW6Emu+ThgNzFvOz4lDc14Ffoh1YBQxiX/DqEV9B2X/IHnEwkxd +Ah9qx0PHOcwb7XNim5j8Z2k2mORNdzCg9n+s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.186.197 with SMTP id i5mr718370hbh.103.1263073559260; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:45:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> From: Andrey Kuzmin Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:45:39 +0300 Message-ID: <2a31deca1001091345u6d9c0f67h7ed57a605adce99@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Same question here with Russian translation. Regards, Andrey On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Andrew Wang w= rote: > Hi, you guys > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project. I > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to k= now > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translating > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > I am working on with my friend and just finish =A0for chapter1 and chapte= r6. > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think this > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > -- > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > From general-return-892-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 02:21:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5636 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 02:21:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 02:21:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 21140 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 02:21:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21065 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 02:21:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21055 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 02:21:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:21:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of tamagawa@osa.att.ne.jp does not designate 211.124.127.8 as permitted sender) Received: from [211.124.127.8] (HELO ougw02.zaq.ne.jp) (211.124.127.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:21:06 +0000 Received: from mlrc01.zaq.ne.jp (mlrc01.zaq-back.ne.jp [10.2.92.33]) by ougw02.zaq.ne.jp with ESMTP id 836141CC003 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:20:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from ouma02.zaq-back.ne.jp (HELO ouma02.zaq.ne.jp) ([10.2.80.34]) by mlrc01.zaq.ne.jp with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2010 11:20:45 +0900 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (zaqdb73c332.zaq.ne.jp [219.115.195.50]) by ouma02.zaq.ne.jp with ESMTP id 5CB20724147; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:20:43 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4B49397B.1050804@osa.att.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:20:43 +0900 From: tamagawa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Andrew Wang Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100109-1, 2010/01/09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I've done the Japanese translation and it will be available from Oreilly Japan soon. I believe it is 'Definitely' helpful. There is an Oreilly office in china: http://oreilly.com/contact.html I think you can contact them to see if there is a plan for the translation and/or you can work as a translator for the book. Regards, -- TAMAGAWA Ryuji (2010/01/10 4:34), Andrew Wang wrote: > Hi, you guys > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project. I > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to know > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translating > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and chapter6. > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think this > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > From general-return-893-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 06:16:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48502 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 06:16:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 06:16:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 87286 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87206 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87196 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 06:16:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:16:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:16:32 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so881705pwi.29 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:16:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gXR/gdfkMzU6cnHk/ZCeLRN0bToH1BV9Gw8+mc4c/Xc=; b=guJBQQ7u66pmLbSHWAACsiJTgzWH1j5a8WmCPZjm1mYn9gRYpUYyCrIDnw+RyN94Ye S5U/espfkpk2tdHMwdmaxy11PfuiJxU4ygJ1JsVFFVG+sVA7MUdoZP8zxV/rhWSS3nHQ s5v57lINlaqZXWAfQ64G+jnQNQ01GZw+ABu/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=WmerLVWKrN2fUIqNhVppq1rpSXdCQYcZsm9xE7/akqXw/wKIag+mYZuoxk5+wsyTOk jK/FjPVjuVW0ODSgDUQfvGbS5BE2sz5nL39NtfJTbpE4owxtDHkBpPp3o504gFxKVbaQ aDB16SH7Dxuhzt4kt/N58qZBoHMWJlQ6Z6DeE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.250.21 with SMTP id x21mr1830998wfh.169.1263104171675; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:16:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:16:11 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed657c778f48047cc95ba6 --001636ed657c778f48047cc95ba6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go deep into hadoop. Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang wr= ote: > Hi, you guys > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project. I > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to > know > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translating > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and chapter6= . > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think this > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > -- > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > --=20 Best Regards Jeff Zhang --001636ed657c778f48047cc95ba6-- From general-return-894-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 06:32:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54463 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 06:32:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 06:32:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 89952 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89867 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89849 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 06:32:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:32:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.wang.1900@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.212] (HELO mail-ew0-f212.google.com) (209.85.219.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:32:29 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so22014973ewy.12 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:32:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ujMbdsXIBSqksyIPzPVBqcaPH2KtQh2UFJv1+KS22Rs=; b=iPi39H5NDv4+OGKU5AgFE07q5g9cPNCb2HeDxRkvGXmh8pyg/SFTVBof6djYfWW22P GxAd9mx/NeUaAhykbQ1WlPq4X0FezcB/eOdPRSB7gSaKtBGnokVBUgincl8cZIkHxyL2 xuHMDGd0wJPemh2478hns3IdRaog4hD3PvUwE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jP/X57uWy5XqMWfjS7umjcxeFhs41/s1i++ejYHyAFK5i6TaMkWoAtle+hcUPN3zuY lyzCbJdDPaP0jqZn1hv/q3tGeVHKJpk9ZIi+WFZlG7xCtv9dgwarqLk322ThCAThCr/+ 15d6AJdabbuN6JThIbKf/V943fmBt3Qlzrv/8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.131 with SMTP id y3mr286190wee.9.1263105127997; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:32:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:32:07 +0800 Message-ID: <995905631001092232g7cdd1f0dwe20e09b70d7e1363@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Andrew Wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77e5e77e2df047cc99431 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d77e5e77e2df047cc99431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Zhang it's nice to meet you. I have seen you in this maillist for serval times. M= y friend and i are translating this book together. Glod to have you join us. However, i am not sure whether we can get the offical authoriation from Orelly. So, before we get it, we can share the transilated Chapters with each other. Is it OK? What is your opinion? On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C > > I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go de= ep > into hadoop. > Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. > > > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang >wrote: > > > Hi, you guys > > > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project.= I > > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical > > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to > > know > > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translati= ng > > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and > chapter6. > > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think thi= s > > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > --=20 http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ --0016e6d77e5e77e2df047cc99431-- From general-return-895-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 06:35:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54713 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 06:35:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 06:35:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 90900 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:35:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90811 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90801 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 06:35:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:35:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:35:48 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so5983482pzk.2 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:35:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z5GUZjCds0dU+6unOlXpYb9abgYbuQEc0+mmUe5sRJk=; b=ZnPsRfrCxw99Uhr3IhD1bn31SmpM4mXWfQgYR5mjfSNsi+G8L8W+9G++I7XCNN1J0+ 84TmzbUCxIVddjyKN2iUiFXsIb4AcP4eHz3e+mJJSrOBLtND45pW/Kl75PHC58Zzz96v SPQUQyvMa1iZvV79fWr8ACVWAjqj92HoaSlPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=duvSSXSoEG7rjqa0f/2YbbuiyNPEYzJEn8VVyo9FooTxnBUxXI5chNsHf0mVizFzbh ID0ARpwAgWHJZaMb59q6kj7ythB+FVN2+J2ahA+5dJjxINtu0Sw9KpLBudq8JK+Z6Vk3 ztK1IyceivPgYeHgR5mwlRlFNBVTI4U810laY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.8 with SMTP id i8mr2693727wfa.310.1263105328449; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:35:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <995905631001092232g7cdd1f0dwe20e09b70d7e1363@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> <995905631001092232g7cdd1f0dwe20e09b70d7e1363@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:35:28 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1321001092235w178fd066n9eb8953c7efbc50@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502af146a89ae047cc9a06b --00504502af146a89ae047cc9a06b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wang, This is good, I agree with the plan. And this is msn: zjfzju@hotmail.com We can talk using IM later. On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Andrew Wang wr= ote: > Hi, Zhang > > it's nice to meet you. I have seen you in this maillist for serval times. > My > friend and i are translating this book together. Glod to have you join us= . > > However, i am not sure whether we can get the offical authoriation from > Orelly. So, before we get it, we can share the transilated Chapters with > each other. Is it OK? > > What is your opinion? > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C > > > > I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go > deep > > into hadoop. > > Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, you guys > > > > > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current projec= t. > I > > > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practica= l > > > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > > > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like = to > > > know > > > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe > translating > > > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > > > > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and > > chapter6. > > > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think > this > > > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > > > > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > -- > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > --=20 Best Regards Jeff Zhang --00504502af146a89ae047cc9a06b-- From general-return-896-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 06:45:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61797 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 06:45:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 06:45:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 93920 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:45:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93861 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 06:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93851 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 06:45:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:45:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yeqian.zju@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.193] (HELO mail-iw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.223.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:45:48 +0000 Received: by iwn31 with SMTP id 31so14717821iwn.5 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:45:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cKzYvrUWlpeU9fZi/lUQsb0jCHf1U7HMNXhyXen+8l4=; b=pUAaCAZtZn1aCv1iSFKXXax3ivMgpmHCthIZx/l7tyJL1o+cTTG9F/GBQOJNk84uNg JiHqGCYbvJnlbJePb8IY8+TBtITUMjsPmtoheCIxptp231hVNkx1diYnND+7NElYrIhq CX+Pt2dLivNsK1rZSBAjONau70r9tA3VBKTOQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=H+Zk8mcJHEXVUYKRQxaghJakW/yHMxYNChh/pv2rHZJOWJvvcJ++45xUXiMw3yW47j emKwDK0rUCHKIt9YPmuTY41BW5Rv5n8n7/pkfS8ocp1XEOZhS4RqL0m8rlnOUt2/WwAU YoPNIiDY4UBkVNV3tuq3tm3/Jsh9myNgIRlvk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.120.136 with SMTP id d8mr2480017ibr.14.1263105928181; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:45:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:45:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Qian Ye To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e644c18e29bdf1047cc9c45f --0016e644c18e29bdf1047cc9c45f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So am I, although i'm just a novice to hadoop. I worked on a project based on the Zookeeper these monthes. I would like to make some help for the Chapter 13, if need. thx~ On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C > > I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go de= ep > into hadoop. > Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. > > > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang >wrote: > > > Hi, you guys > > > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project.= I > > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical > > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like to > > know > > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translati= ng > > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and > chapter6. > > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think thi= s > > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > --=20 With Regards! Ye, Qian Made in Zhejiang University --0016e644c18e29bdf1047cc9c45f-- From general-return-897-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 07:21:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66286 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 07:21:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 07:21:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 6402 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 07:21:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6322 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 07:21:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6312 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 07:21:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:21:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:21:08 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so5997102pzk.2 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.66.29 with SMTP id t29mr13810228wak.187.1263108043049; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pcpcpcda585799 ([168.115.119.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm20218285pzk.13.2010.01.09.23.20.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:20:42 -0800 (PST) From: "hadoop" To: References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: re about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:26:44 +0900 Message-ID: <010b01ca91c6$444c8ca0$cce5a5e0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: zh-cn Thread-Index: AcqRwI90yZSow5p5QY6+etYLGacCcwABVa3A X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, There is an unreleased Chinese version about this book Check it http://www.china-pub.com/196200 Best Regards Jimey Ren So am I, although i'm just a novice to hadoop. I worked on a project = based on the Zookeeper these monthes. I would like to make some help for the Chapter 13, if need. thx~ On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C > > I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go = deep > into hadoop. > Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. > > > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang = >wrote: > > > Hi, you guys > > > > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current = project. I > > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and = practical > > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many > > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like = to > > know > > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe = translating > > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. > > > > I am working on with my friend and just finish for chapter1 and > chapter6. > > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think = this > > job/work will be useful or helpful? > > > > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > --=20 With Regards! Ye, Qian Made in Zhejiang University From general-return-898-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 08:10:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70909 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 08:10:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 08:10:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 20924 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 08:10:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20859 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 08:10:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20849 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 08:10:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:10:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:09:53 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so6010739pzk.2 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:09:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vq2rSBVqemHN8thyY5ZLReZYp+ilCzdtJXFGDx3RHdE=; b=sC3j0paEgcnVsvBpiUkqsrqKNniGWhd7khqWQ/54CEb/kWMK4GmCLLKAZ4w+xS+UWr TytPAswrNzyeU6p/MzfQst3S6Og/gfNZ45mnrg25o0dYR9sIhpDg4/v/FCu3iO6gdFI7 J+3Z7RcHMK/W9Qv3CHk0cjPTx8pcSW8BjwwYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=smWqMG+QGyNgHtdQ2vk4oRfDb60wJBtkpjr2V8Guu2FsaMad/rDNcG/qv/eOI1rMhv pGBBbj0W4DyAgn2IzkfSUaGnWeBFTGFmuo+u8HbIa5OR+DKfHGOqrvpXvyf8h/vGhBuN X+R7+F4INT1MbbWS+NeKxP+ynTM0xqZL2jg/o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.55.16 with SMTP id d16mr5559294rva.279.1263110971997; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:09:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:09:31 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af21001100009g27cd859dw4aa80a99fac24d3b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We can create a project on Yeeyan (www.yeeyan.org). On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Qian Ye wrote: > So am I, although i'm just a novice to hadoop. I worked on a project base= d > on the Zookeeper these monthes. I would like to make some help for the > Chapter 13, if need. > > thx~ > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > >> Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C >> >> I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go d= eep >> into hadoop. >> Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang > >wrote: >> >> > Hi, you guys >> > >> > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current project= . I >> > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practical >> > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many >> > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like t= o >> > know >> > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe translat= ing >> > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. >> > >> > I am working on with my friend and just finish =C2=A0for chapter1 and >> chapter6. >> > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think th= is >> > job/work will be useful or helpful? >> > >> > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards >> >> Jeff Zhang >> > > > > -- > With Regards! > > Ye, Qian > Made in Zhejiang University > From general-return-899-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 17:30:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12610 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 17:30:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 17:30:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 76812 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 17:30:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76743 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 17:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76733 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 17:30:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:30:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:30:20 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so19055942fxm.29 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:29:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=7RIG254y2pRYsMRvA80GnIlTUFMBNlGr3O7NHttGtxQ=; b=heD2qk/LzurjojZZMRP/Y5rlpShVmxgj4RP6C+f6emgFDGFzqjDLwITSusSlCxNLE4 SWECxzdO/xfQBdVUAtW8gKwLFH+rrS+5gUtYYRI0NDBobTtudbIAuP6TjWkOoYwOajRD 8lQqbHxP92ezuDVDVwruwIyFmfGzx1v+JSfjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OKaFWteVkgQbJM8LGtiTIb0U1hIvWxkn1ToZMvZklaU+xcqDpcS45Kl0jPcqOPSasR BcuUb6k8WLKh4reJzRUh7e5RStquumH4lyFCm5KgCN8krBWx8DLL7Hf+tKqDNwCNew+m zxlWdM3g2MRuioiqhA5pZCWfjRKXgA8PcMOok= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.81.35 with SMTP id i35mr1467375mul.42.1263144599591; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:29:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:29:59 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001100929v25f9bce8sc7c788755ea8b55b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: MOVING FILES BETWEEN DIRS IN HDFS From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e656b6e4289d56047cd2c50b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e656b6e4289d56047cd2c50b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! I=B4m trying to move a file from a dir in HDFS to another via = API (more specifically, with *FileUtil* class). This is because I=B4m launching= a program within Eclipse against a remote HDFS. Is the "copy" method proper for what I want to do, or is another alternative (like copyTo-copyFrom sequence)? Thanks a lot in advance. --=20 Alberto --0016e656b6e4289d56047cd2c50b-- From general-return-900-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 20:20:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81254 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 20:20:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 20:20:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 9021 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 20:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8915 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 20:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8905 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 20:20:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:20:29 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-36-45.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.36.45]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B75DDC39C for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:20:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B4A3675.5080901@lifeless.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:20:05 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: MOVING FILES BETWEEN DIRS IN HDFS References: <309f76d01001100929v25f9bce8sc7c788755ea8b55b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <309f76d01001100929v25f9bce8sc7c788755ea8b55b@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/10/10 12:29 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas wrote: > Hi everyone! I´m trying to move a file from a dir in HDFS to another via API > (more specifically, with *FileUtil* class). This is because I´m launching a > program within Eclipse against a remote HDFS. Is the "copy" method proper > for what I want to do, or is another alternative (like copyTo-copyFrom > sequence)? > Thanks a lot in advance. > Alberto: There is no method for moving a file in FileUtil because it's already just a single simple method call. Use FileSystem#rename(Path, Path) instead to move files. The copy methods will leave you with two of the same file (which you probably don't want). Hope that helps. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-901-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 21:38:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2144 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 21:38:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 21:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 62525 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 21:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62432 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 21:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62422 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 21:38:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.152] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:38:32 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so351681fgg.11 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:38:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=frY0YvR7oqJGZ5nmO4g/+IJha9zzembt8is3FQpC4jE=; b=f71PytddnXewWai3bRwObgQ6b/npFEYt0T59NvC/F9yDpZWCEax21dsVEEdK6LitgE acexk2hFs/hFFh2Efrqlg0zFPYtTCINxtKrd9EuxUqUrMV9wSPspQ9eR3GJ3/fzkldks wOlvWcvvuGy9eKWP2i0QbOGAH/qzYL/1JF9Dg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jfcF548j1/i+OuZ67VBjV1HCqFESntZTGNBnxWYQsYWaAT890d5YdR/hP0QfThxcOc Vo8GLvzJtoLpoIvwyT21OSsfgG4imJIXfLg+gOU40051tjtAfINgB54oz7b2XXmIWH3t sn7S7H1cRCon/Fat9Tu+yagykrrRmUc7fDdEs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.161.7 with SMTP id j7mr6657878mue.111.1263159491121; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:38:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4A3675.5080901@lifeless.net> References: <309f76d01001100929v25f9bce8sc7c788755ea8b55b@mail.gmail.com> <4B4A3675.5080901@lifeless.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001101338s21f0f3eel828c28addde3bf97@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: MOVING FILES BETWEEN DIRS IN HDFS From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c78fdc3543b047cd63c1e --0016364c78fdc3543b047cd63c1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks a lot for the reply Eric. I=B4ll give it a try. 2010/1/10 Eric Sammer > On 1/10/10 12:29 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas wrote: > > Hi everyone! I=B4m trying to move a file from a dir in HDFS to another = via > API > > (more specifically, with *FileUtil* class). This is because I=B4m launc= hing > a > > program within Eclipse against a remote HDFS. Is the "copy" method prop= er > > for what I want to do, or is another alternative (like copyTo-copyFrom > > sequence)? > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > > Alberto: > > There is no method for moving a file in FileUtil because it's already > just a single simple method call. Use FileSystem#rename(Path, Path) > instead to move files. The copy methods will leave you with two of the > same file (which you probably don't want). > > Hope that helps. > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifeless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > --=20 Alberto --0016364c78fdc3543b047cd63c1e-- From general-return-902-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 10 23:23:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33526 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 23:23:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 23:23:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 30878 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30802 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30792 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:23:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.212] (HELO mail-fx0-f212.google.com) (209.85.220.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:22:52 +0000 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so17465972fxm.12 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:22:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tkEE890sE2cuXkkPsbIFtI265us/3ZpCZbUr+pXICjw=; b=YAEVAAwMjM7BsJPQLHWdjtsszLd8Hp28TtPGA/YLgY18vKPRGFuBw+d5xcxk325z+Z Ys20UDX4JfvuNRs8bdOXY5wQSEkWHXP7WFvr5J2KDAvDpAv+JDyAsO2LzCypjiv+8mxg 2dbYgG4V9syHtP5DopM6H7//D7zILK1pGXTRQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mPt46mh38Z6h5OgR74jY5Dz2Zl6uSfg1LTnE0TGul2BV44f730KsYp4NoWXzIL3Vtu qaSqeOA/YL3yyFokGE5Rb8p+N3+68zdQNobZr+A7OcAzsyUff2ndeLZBz32xxPo//75y mHISi5UfcB6w4PXCQlt9LsVNPwvaJCJC3GFuw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.14.13 with SMTP id 13mr1257905mun.32.1263165752105; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:22:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd1001081647x14d68f76h9d4eda3ef3502d4c@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001081524t45faa45vf54640e503d67b5@mail.gmail.com> <3c682ecd1001081647x14d68f76h9d4eda3ef3502d4c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:22:32 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001101522y56852912s85975efb8b3cbc58@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: QUESTION ABOUT PARTITIONERS From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b954af25a0c047cd7b1ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b954af25a0c047cd7b1ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Abrishek. Thanks for the quick reply. I=B4ve already read twice your pap= er and I find it fantastic. I=B4m working on a similar project for my final wo= rk at studies and your work gave me a bunch of ideas. I=B4ll try your approach and feedback results. 2010/1/9 Abhishek Verma > Hi Alberto, > > You should be able to override the default partitioner class in pseudo > distributed and the fully distributed mode. I used the same technique for > the paper "Scaling Genetic Algorithms using MapReduce" [ > http://verma7.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ISDA09_MR_GA.pdf] that yo= u > might find useful. > > -Abhishek. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone! First of all, happy new year to all community!. I=B4m actu= ally > > developing an Map-Reduce approach to genetic algorithms, and I was > > questioning the use and effectivity of Partitioners in the Map-Reduce > flow. > > I=B4ve been working in pseudo-distributed mode and didn=B4t find any ex= ample > of > > usage of Partitioner classes. Does this mean that using another > Partitioner > > -not the default one- have sense only on a Fully Distributed environmen= t? > > Which Partitioner should I implement with my GA approach? > > Thanks a lot in advance! > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > --=20 Alberto --0016363b954af25a0c047cd7b1ec-- From general-return-903-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 11 10:58:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47850 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 10:58:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 10:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 67397 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 10:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67313 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 10:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67300 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 10:58:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:58:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.mailing@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:58:05 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so13772313bwz.29 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:57:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nPoa3lw5UwAdDTpzenEIIEI+pJbOwu+woWm1zsGIS38=; b=iHeP6ce8gHMx5yzDRk7/I/3Ocy++Pd32UY/ekfKWTkcZjzC+EfXc/ccHuVFk2U3VgE LHNOMEKQQthUTrF1wTdO4DGOWmIY0cg8N37RboR+Iu68ofX+1KrAdpyNSR8CxHRD9E5Y So1QujDKV34jil4VmWnrlKr7wM2aa9C5whX6Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kLef5YOjfHOB3+h6Pnu3f2XmE9JXnrqO6ob+UlVkwkDpKY0oo6KmCyTSvsfxz/pCNi P398g6o9lPbLqccg8vNzz6is7DNgvq6Dy8z+vguflbb7d87UkJ/9j82H2gkO//50HdU8 ASmXi5f1OqsK6Oo5weA8uxyuctCn6w6yh5XdQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.69 with SMTP id n5mr1642553bkw.43.1263207464752; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:57:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:57:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Maven repository ? From: Antonio Goncalves To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cfbca36d923047ce1681d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cfbca36d923047ce1681d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I'm new to Hadoop and I'm starting with some Hello Worlds. I'm used to use Maven so I've automatically created a pom.xml.... but I could not find any dependecies. In MvnRepository I found the following : http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jvnet.hudson.hadoop/hadoop-core *http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.mahout.hadoop/hadoop-core* But I don't know if there is a problem with the pom.xml or not, but it doesn't download the hadoop dependencies. I've also read in older mails that there was not an official Hadoop Maven repository. Do you know if things have changed ? Is there a repository ? If yes, what is the groupId and artifactId ? Thanks, Antonio --0015175cfbca36d923047ce1681d-- From general-return-904-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 11 11:10:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50415 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 11:10:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 11:10:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 73948 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 11:10:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73871 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 11:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73861 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 11:10:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:10:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antonio.mailing@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:10:37 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so13779490bwz.29 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:10:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=owQMYHEeiw9JxXEkXbT60kSsv4eSnX48X9XQzYc4xUc=; b=UKpDG+6B2hUn1iNR7puLRobOCefMCF1e+Bwze1Hz7e36Szjaod/npWOBr5+cEdAfpg pxVxXFBFYrIax54QdadZedyVTz5Z77s8RGT2n9l9YnlKdKrYZce8fQscgVWlrNbiimmf bPMKNG4RbyTZ+9ku5kcgbbwgdziKGSKRUfVuM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KzPiQDaSeDsr3CyyLn7qT6vz0u/Q2RIPNuV2iaBoMSYptfPWoXr6x/4mOMJp8La1sL XRTN/2TeQnywHXeXvCGmWDv+C4FfnWWuHADe88DXz6mKEfLo/KzWIVvHw2D0+i18GJ4z yMQgFnZJPyQi2cxQU0E64fwkSRGFDbzS4bHj8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.157.2 with SMTP id z2mr3061339bkw.211.1263208216594; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:10:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:10:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Running Hadoop across data centers From: Antonio Goncalves To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cf8ca0708fa047ce195c1 --0015175cf8ca0708fa047ce195c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I'm reading the excellent Tom White Hadoop guide and there is this sentence written : "At the time of this writing, Hadoop is not suited for running across data centers" Do you know if it's still the case ? Do you know what are the technical reasons behind that ? We are planning to test MapReduce in several scenarios, one being multiple data centers (one in France and the other one in Germany with special network lines). Wouldn't that be possible ? Thanks, Antonio --0015175cf8ca0708fa047ce195c1-- From general-return-905-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 11 17:59:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50846 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 17:59:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 17:59:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 16331 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 17:58:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16268 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 17:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16258 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 17:58:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:58:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:58:49 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so20958564yxe.5 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.134.13 with SMTP id l13mr13961997ann.191.1263232708019; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:06 -0800 Message-ID: <15da8a101001110958n18ba6322jcbe41d3247bad386@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Maven repository ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5c0ded48689047ce748ee --001636c5c0ded48689047ce748ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cloudera publishes a repository for its distribution. See http://repository.cloudera.com/artifactory/repo/com.cloudera/ . You mayalso want to take a look at http://github.com/cloudera/repository-example, which is an example of building wordcount, using Ivy, against the snapshot repository. -- Philip On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Antonio Goncalves < antonio.mailing@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to Hadoop and I'm starting with some Hello Worlds. I'm used to use > Maven so I've automatically created a pom.xml.... but I could not find any > dependecies. In MvnRepository I found the following : > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jvnet.hudson.hadoop/hadoop-core > > *http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.mahout.hadoop/hadoop-core* > But I don't know if there is a problem with the pom.xml or not, but it > doesn't download the hadoop dependencies. I've also read in older mails > that > there was not an official Hadoop Maven repository. Do you know if things > have changed ? Is there a repository ? If yes, what is the groupId and > artifactId ? > > Thanks, > Antonio > --001636c5c0ded48689047ce748ee-- From general-return-906-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 11 18:16:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63362 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 18:16:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 18:16:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 48050 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 18:16:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47968 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 18:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47958 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 18:16:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:16:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:15:59 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (pool-96-246-67-178.nycmny.east.verizon.net [96.246.67.178]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2F9DC39C for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:15:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:15:35 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/11/10 6:10 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm reading the excellent Tom White Hadoop guide and there is this sentence > written : > > "At the time of this writing, Hadoop is not suited for running across data > centers" > > Do you know if it's still the case ? Do you know what are the technical > reasons behind that ? We are planning to test MapReduce in several > scenarios, one being multiple data centers (one in France and the other one > in Germany with special network lines). Wouldn't that be possible ? If the network connection between said data centers is low latency enough to not prevent the heartbeat connections, it should work, but performance will almost definitely not be good. There are few (major) concerns with doing this. The performance reason is that the intermediary files produced by mappers could be potentially shuffled between data centers. If this is a lot of data (likely) you'll be killing your connections between facilities. This is one of the primary reasons it's recommended against. Also, you'll (potentially) have Hadoop (specifically HDFS) making data block replicas across data centers which is going to be a lot of traffic. >From a security perspective, Hadoop is assumed to be running in a trusted environment. It's not hardened or designed to be exposed to untrusted networks *at all*. If you did over a public network of any kind, it would absolutely have to be over a VPN which is going to further exacerbate the performance issues. You'll undoubtedly also want to encrypt this communication if your data is remotely sensitive... Another significant reason not to do this (right now) has to do with the block assignment scheduling and the potential for getting yourself into a situation where the VPN or inter-data center connection becomes a significant scaling issue as well as a single point of failure for the cluster. I'm sure one could attempt to address these issues with very fancy network topology scripts for HDFS, redundant data center interconnects, and a ton of money for high speed connections, but I can't see it being feasible in terms of cost or maintenance. ...but that's just my opinion. ;) I'm certainly interested to hear if anyone is actually brave enough to do this in production, though. Hope this helps. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-907-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 11 18:36:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73791 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2010 18:36:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2010 18:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 74934 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 18:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74853 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2010 18:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74843 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2010 18:36:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [15.193.32.61] (HELO g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com) (15.193.32.61) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:36:16 +0000 Received: from G3W0630.americas.hpqcorp.net (g3w0630.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.233.58.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA04C39F for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G5W0602.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.228.9.185) by G3W0630.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.233.58.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:34:56 +0000 Received: from GVW1114EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.228.24.170]) by G5W0602.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.228.9.185]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:34:56 +0000 From: "Day, Phil" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:34:53 +0000 Subject: RE: Running Hadoop across data centers Thread-Topic: Running Hadoop across data centers Thread-Index: AcqS6ichbAIwdaDhR/OjUA1RVkb6TwAAfE9g Message-ID: References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> In-Reply-To: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Aside from the "Because it might be possible" - I'm curious as to why would= you want to do this ? With no real namenode resilience until 0.21 (and even then you'd have to be= quiet smart with the data placement) I can't see a good availability reaso= n for wanting to do this. Is it because you want/need a cluster that you can't physically fit into on= e data centre ? I'd of thought that you might do better to split your data set into two, ru= n identical jobs in each DC and then process the combined results on one of= the clusters. Phil -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:eric@lifeless.net]=20 Sent: 11 January 2010 18:16 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers On 1/11/10 6:10 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I'm reading the excellent Tom White Hadoop guide and there is this senten= ce > written : >=20 > "At the time of this writing, Hadoop is not suited for running across dat= a > centers" >=20 > Do you know if it's still the case ? Do you know what are the technical > reasons behind that ? We are planning to test MapReduce in several > scenarios, one being multiple data centers (one in France and the other o= ne > in Germany with special network lines). Wouldn't that be possible ? If the network connection between said data centers is low latency enough to not prevent the heartbeat connections, it should work, but performance will almost definitely not be good. There are few (major) concerns with doing this. The performance reason is that the intermediary files produced by mappers could be potentially shuffled between data centers. If this is a lot of data (likely) you'll be killing your connections between facilities. This is one of the primary reasons it's recommended against. Also, you'll (potentially) have Hadoop (specifically HDFS) making data block replicas across data centers which is going to be a lot of traffic. >From a security perspective, Hadoop is assumed to be running in a trusted environment. It's not hardened or designed to be exposed to untrusted networks *at all*. If you did over a public network of any kind, it would absolutely have to be over a VPN which is going to further exacerbate the performance issues. You'll undoubtedly also want to encrypt this communication if your data is remotely sensitive... Another significant reason not to do this (right now) has to do with the block assignment scheduling and the potential for getting yourself into a situation where the VPN or inter-data center connection becomes a significant scaling issue as well as a single point of failure for the cluster. I'm sure one could attempt to address these issues with very fancy network topology scripts for HDFS, redundant data center interconnects, and a ton of money for high speed connections, but I can't see it being feasible in terms of cost or maintenance. ...but that's just my opinion. ;) I'm certainly interested to hear if anyone is actually brave enough to do this in production, though. Hope this helps. --=20 Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-908-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 01:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39824 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 01:10:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 01:10:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 20489 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 01:10:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20411 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 01:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20401 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 01:10:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:10:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.133.104.83] (HELO www83.your-server.de) (213.133.104.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:10:39 +0000 Received: from [85.178.192.242] (helo=[192.168.178.47]) by www83.your-server.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUVH1-0002EG-7z; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:10:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4B4BAFD4.9030507@swe-blog.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:10:12 +0100 From: Oliver Fischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Reviewer wanted for german articel on Hadoop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: dialog@sw-blog.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.95.1/10284/Tue Jan 12 00:20:00 2010) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I am currently writing an small introductive articel for a german online magazine. To ensure the correctness of my article I would like to know if someone from Berlin (Germany) here around who is willing to review the articel? Best regards, Oliver -- Oliver B. Fischer, Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin Tel. +49 30 44793251, Mobil: +49 178 7903538 Mail: o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net Blog: http://www.swe-blog.net From general-return-909-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 01:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41107 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 01:17:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 01:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 27624 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 01:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27541 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 01:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27531 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 01:17:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:17:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.208.4.195] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (74.208.4.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:17:11 +0000 Received: from Ralf-Schreijers-MacBook-Pro.local (i59F5365E.versanet.de [89.245.54.94]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LwK2Q-1NxUIr2cEI-018F3K; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:16:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4BCD7D.3040502@sensenetworks.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:16:45 -0500 From: Ralf Schreijer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Reviewer wanted for german articel on Hadoop References: <4B4BAFD4.9030507@swe-blog.net> In-Reply-To: <4B4BAFD4.9030507@swe-blog.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+VT4otH1oDEZAtKB1ZgjgoZgpa3Tq+L7zCd+y 0w0Zq2oKvJ+vGCZgW8gMFgX7Jo2/qtqAXcpfyi0t9DFzsIzSKt Aa8jMHUjqbjsKNaWs7jqrvWYatLlDCz I am not from Berlin but native in German (if you are looking for that), send it over! --Ralf Oliver Fischer wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently writing an small introductive articel for a german online > magazine. To ensure the correctness of my article I would like to know > if someone from Berlin (Germany) here around who is willing to review > the articel? > > Best regards, > > Oliver > From general-return-910-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 11:02:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50677 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 11:02:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 11:02:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 25753 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 11:02:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25660 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 11:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25650 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 11:02:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:02:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antonio.mailing@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:02:12 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so14638722bwz.29 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:01:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+wLcDkvpTjnNPTjsPXc1mLDN7s2miTEkGvym+/3xJ2U=; b=oJPPMNi3R7Wgq2fKOz2G5702S0TDYSJL1MXsdhdzyyNkYj7a16knF/fdXHAvav8DqS U0/FP75sn4Z7KJuB/EinlPdIiN2RUNOnDAdyn9seCxBguLDNr8aLU1g4e8MlXHaGWHG3 0y9F+IdCxGDuV0aNDzK/IYWeipBp1dApF+wpc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dTL7AHfehHXUfShO+Gn0GBA0mdpKxAk+NO5gf2gwPqE2VahaACRUpao5ndJ14EAu7n lSxokNGgYJTw7LQ1IZZ6px+RGqx1Qgg8QjDvOa3PRTX6edUQ9krLBxfUIQ09RYIRKpJF vFxH6JMFM9hCcBI47aiJS7gXlI5TJJEu2X46o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.131 with SMTP id h3mr2553766bkd.53.1263294110729; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:01:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:01:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers From: Antonio Goncalves To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325559a92b78a04047cf59438 --000325559a92b78a04047cf59438 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but the rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm (such as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one datacenter. For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second datacenter based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I guess that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the 20% it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked on yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that big (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation based on archived data). Antonio 2010/1/11 Day, Phil > Aside from the "Because it might be possible" - I'm curious as to why would > you want to do this ? > > With no real namenode resilience until 0.21 (and even then you'd have to be > quiet smart with the data placement) I can't see a good availability reason > for wanting to do this. > > Is it because you want/need a cluster that you can't physically fit into > one data centre ? > > I'd of thought that you might do better to split your data set into two, > run identical jobs in each DC and then process the combined results on one > of the clusters. > > Phil > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Sammer [mailto:eric@lifeless.net] > Sent: 11 January 2010 18:16 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers > > On 1/11/10 6:10 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm reading the excellent Tom White Hadoop guide and there is this > sentence > > written : > > > > "At the time of this writing, Hadoop is not suited for running across > data > > centers" > > > > Do you know if it's still the case ? Do you know what are the technical > > reasons behind that ? We are planning to test MapReduce in several > > scenarios, one being multiple data centers (one in France and the other > one > > in Germany with special network lines). Wouldn't that be possible ? > > If the network connection between said data centers is low latency > enough to not prevent the heartbeat connections, it should work, but > performance will almost definitely not be good. > > There are few (major) concerns with doing this. The performance reason > is that the intermediary files produced by mappers could be potentially > shuffled between data centers. If this is a lot of data (likely) you'll > be killing your connections between facilities. This is one of the > primary reasons it's recommended against. Also, you'll (potentially) > have Hadoop (specifically HDFS) making data block replicas across data > centers which is going to be a lot of traffic. > > From a security perspective, Hadoop is assumed to be running in a > trusted environment. It's not hardened or designed to be exposed to > untrusted networks *at all*. If you did over a public network of any > kind, it would absolutely have to be over a VPN which is going to > further exacerbate the performance issues. You'll undoubtedly also want > to encrypt this communication if your data is remotely sensitive... > > Another significant reason not to do this (right now) has to do with the > block assignment scheduling and the potential for getting yourself into > a situation where the VPN or inter-data center connection becomes a > significant scaling issue as well as a single point of failure for the > cluster. > > I'm sure one could attempt to address these issues with very fancy > network topology scripts for HDFS, redundant data center interconnects, > and a ton of money for high speed connections, but I can't see it being > feasible in terms of cost or maintenance. > > ...but that's just my opinion. ;) > > I'm certainly interested to hear if anyone is actually brave enough to > do this in production, though. > > Hope this helps. > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifeless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > -- -- Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves@gmail.com) Software architect Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org Blog: agoncal.wordpress.com Feed: feeds2.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal --000325559a92b78a04047cf59438-- From general-return-911-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 15:55:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78487 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 15:55:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 15:55:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 74623 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 15:55:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74524 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 15:55:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74512 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 15:55:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:55:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.mailing@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:55:03 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so14876050bwz.29 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:54:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yWd4SQCrTb/Z5gQMt3ygmjOXJxclz9guHdMcDbJTne0=; b=F6wHA/aqOyWSnmu1HaUUXF/vSYm6MbT+tgJXalVndgMziCepBeAu/Q7Gh8wFMj867C 6o/bIRdn3CBqJxoEVI9UfuLrwhZHfT9gD+M4LSOQj5WCBphNtLOYrdQHrhLWoQwqT+yw vum1bh/v0nVyF/2vRTJSilIJiavNcpsiUlLuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fpvnfZ6bdq+WWcziugmjMx5dUN+UO9+8UzbFF2hp6DSPrmallc6l70YiwpkWRZBVO4 0aVlj7R/O99co3WFModvmoD+Jwk1RSATI8bMjrcBtQlttrvEQsKblkNXyaCKCf021lvq 6JK53Qw6t/WBYccq5r8NgkPabgD+gdkF7/QSQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.148.85 with SMTP id o21mr2720175bkv.134.1263311682747; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:54:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <15da8a101001110958n18ba6322jcbe41d3247bad386@mail.gmail.com> References: <15da8a101001110958n18ba6322jcbe41d3247bad386@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:54:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maven repository ? From: Antonio Goncalves To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd962173cfd047cf9acb6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cd962173cfd047cf9acb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Philip, I've tryied using the Cloudera Maven repository but I can't make it work. I'm using Maven 2.1 and when I add : cloudera libs-releases http://repository.cloudera.com/artifactory/libs-releases Maven looks for : http://repository.cloudera.com/artifactory/libs-releases/com/cloudera/hadoop-core/0.20.1+152/hadoop-core-0.20.1+152.pom(see the com/cloudera (slash) instead of the com.cloudera (dot). (note that the pom.xml is missing in the Cloudera repository) I thought it was a Maven 1 repository so I've added legacy but it doesn't work either. Any idea ? Thanks Antonio 2010/1/11 Philip Zeyliger > Cloudera publishes a repository for its distribution. See > http://repository.cloudera.com/artifactory/repo/com.cloudera/ . > > You mayalso want to take a look at > http://github.com/cloudera/repository-example, which is an example of > building wordcount, using Ivy, against the snapshot repository. > > -- Philip > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Antonio Goncalves < > antonio.mailing@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm new to Hadoop and I'm starting with some Hello Worlds. I'm used to > use > > Maven so I've automatically created a pom.xml.... but I could not find > any > > dependecies. In MvnRepository I found the following : > > > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jvnet.hudson.hadoop/hadoop-core > > > > *http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.mahout.hadoop/hadoop-core* > > But I don't know if there is a problem with the pom.xml or not, but it > > doesn't download the hadoop dependencies. I've also read in older mails > > that > > there was not an official Hadoop Maven repository. Do you know if things > > have changed ? Is there a repository ? If yes, what is the groupId and > > artifactId ? > > > > Thanks, > > Antonio > > > -- -- Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves@gmail.com) Software architect Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org Blog: agoncal.wordpress.com Feed: feeds2.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal --0015175cd962173cfd047cf9acb6-- From general-return-912-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 16:03:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81238 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 16:03:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 16:03:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 89208 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 16:03:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89152 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 16:03:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89142 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 16:03:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:03:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:03:47 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (pool-96-246-67-178.nycmny.east.verizon.net [96.246.67.178]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5405DDC39C for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:25 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/12/10 6:01 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: > Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. > > We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but the > rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm (such > as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one datacenter. > For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second datacenter > based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I guess > that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the 20% > it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked on > yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that big > (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation based > on archived data). Antonio: The point here is that if you build one logical Hadoop cluster across two data centers, then Hadoop will consider all nodes as candidates for receiving work regardless of which data center the job is started in. This means that there's no guarantees about how much data will be shuffled between data centers (during the shuffle phase). The same is true for the HDFS layer - there's no promise that data won't be shuffling between data centers for replication; in fact, it's likely it will. If you want to make sure compute intensive jobs run in data center A you'll probably have better luck creating two logical Hadoop clusters, each confined to a data center, and then simply making sure the proper data sets are available in each Hadoop cluster. This way, there will be no unbounded, uncontrolled data transfer between data centers and job performance will not suffer. The down side is that you may have to copy data from one data center to another if the data for job running in data center A is produced in data center B. I would definitely watch the Cloudera Hadoop MapReduce and HDFS training video[1] and look over the information on the Hadoop wiki and web site prior to doing anything at all. It may clear a few things up. Also, I highly recommend the book Hadoop: The Definitive Guide by Tom White / O'Reilly[2] if you haven't read it. It has tons of excellent information about the map reduce process and how it works under the hood. [1] - http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training-mapreduce-hdfs [2] - http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-913-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 17:05:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4341 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 17:05:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 17:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 99487 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 17:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99436 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 17:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99425 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 17:05:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:05:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antonio.mailing@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:05:10 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so14952959bwz.29 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:04:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c2kv/wDryHvqfRykhzN9Sc310pW+Emj2CcUnjz8cWAk=; b=CMjAYSpniBwqPAJMGfaKER7GQvL1+YExYS5ycN1kqPFSm1rX1o6BUtaB6yukrk/LNf d0hT1amksiTEm5f+NCDMUQ7yOKO6r/Mw1Af9zYj0G/3NBf3aoNJZD6D7u5uZ+hSNhfRB pE3J4juD2fQhFbK2VYCSJCprvewwFX8gB9HNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XI/PjfsKAfhGdDH/xqxdvZPZhhYiEVnSib699zZsDWrvJVXP8msfvfuTtZWKBA71fD rbHIk+p3CKzyzyuwNradxAx7oXMyvZefTfx+/DKLEeGd4451WXrhOvCPhl9muYwujk4V 6n9g54XdRqGGC7tJywLyVakdliaJPOxLsTXQw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.220 with SMTP id i28mr163664bki.143.1263315888903; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:04:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:04:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers From: Antonio Goncalves To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758a57acc158c047cfaa65f --00151758a57acc158c047cfaa65f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Eric. That's really usefull information. I've started reading the Hadoop Guide book and I'll watch the video. Antonio 2010/1/12 Eric Sammer > On 1/12/10 6:01 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: > > Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. > > > > We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but > the > > rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm > (such > > as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one > datacenter. > > For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second > datacenter > > based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I > guess > > that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the > 20% > > it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked > on > > yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that > big > > (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation > based > > on archived data). > > Antonio: > > The point here is that if you build one logical Hadoop cluster across > two data centers, then Hadoop will consider all nodes as candidates for > receiving work regardless of which data center the job is started in. > This means that there's no guarantees about how much data will be > shuffled between data centers (during the shuffle phase). The same is > true for the HDFS layer - there's no promise that data won't be > shuffling between data centers for replication; in fact, it's likely it > will. > > If you want to make sure compute intensive jobs run in data center A > you'll probably have better luck creating two logical Hadoop clusters, > each confined to a data center, and then simply making sure the proper > data sets are available in each Hadoop cluster. This way, there will be > no unbounded, uncontrolled data transfer between data centers and job > performance will not suffer. > > The down side is that you may have to copy data from one data center to > another if the data for job running in data center A is produced in data > center B. > > I would definitely watch the Cloudera Hadoop MapReduce and HDFS training > video[1] and look over the information on the Hadoop wiki and web site > prior to doing anything at all. It may clear a few things up. > > Also, I highly recommend the book Hadoop: The Definitive Guide by Tom > White / O'Reilly[2] if you haven't read it. It has tons of excellent > information about the map reduce process and how it works under the hood. > > [1] - http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training-mapreduce-hdfs > [2] - http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 > > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifeless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > -- -- Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves@gmail.com) Software architect Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org Blog: agoncal.wordpress.com Feed: feeds2.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal --00151758a57acc158c047cfaa65f-- From general-return-914-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 12 20:41:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3748 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2010 20:41:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2010 20:41:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 39696 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 20:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39540 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2010 20:41:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39471 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2010 20:41:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:41:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:41:30 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so16946922pxi.5 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:41:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.214.34 with SMTP id m34mr2327443wag.88.1263328868364; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:41:08 -0800 (PST) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:48 -0800 Message-ID: <69035571001121240l3e1c2275x6b739f9195e8ea57@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Announcement: Hadoop Training in February (Bay Area) and March (NYC) To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64b0bce6ef3ee047cfdac54 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64b0bce6ef3ee047cfdac54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop Fans, We're looking forward to a full house at our upcoming sessions in January (Bay Area) and February (NYC). For those of you who have inquired recently, we're sorry we sold out so early this month! It's amazing to see the community growing so quickly. To that end, we're happy to announce two additional sessions: February 22-24 (SF Bay Area): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/527260049 March 10-12 (NYC): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/534680243 You can get 10% off either session by registering at least 30 days in advance. February's Bay Area Hadoop Training session will again be led by Tom White (author of O'Reilly's "Hadoop: The Definitive Guide") and will be sponsored by Yahoo! this time. You'll get to hear from Owen O'Malley, Yahoo! Architect and Apache VP for Hadoop, about running Hadoop on some of the largest clusters in the world. We're really excited about the interest we've had from major technology leaders in sharing their experiences with new Hadoop users, and we hope to continue taking advantage of this to share that perspective with the community. For those of you hoping to spend more time working on web scale data problems, this is a great chance to get certified and learn more about job opportunities at Yahoo! - and it's not just Yahoo! that's hiring for Hadoop. Obtaining your certification is a great way to stand out for all those Hadoop jobs out there. Here's a great graph showing how interest is rising rapidly amongst employers: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=hadoop&l=&relative=1 Christophe and the Cloudera Team -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera --0016e64b0bce6ef3ee047cfdac54-- From general-return-915-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 19:09:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17606 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 19:09:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 19:09:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 23066 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:09:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22993 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22983 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 19:09:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:09:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:09:46 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so184380fgg.11 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:09:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tgKULljTGy+vTS7khE9a1642bhr2Inlmpnr5k3sgWSw=; b=H7JGxK+v8IJ3VJYTc8zkjSfK+AppFPGy55GnnYemUm5XHlYMjIkdAg9RMc5NC+6Bcd 5jif2+FWqEZtzQwwJRFaK6IjESJe7WAwyhUUHk9HOQ8qZDw5rv/dI5Uz2fBAwqkfaQu+ l1qYEoZLntDD6hbz3j+ldxE+4VqK8rXGbvsJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=RwO3IwyFB97I3IW0JFxTqIuEdAVY0hgcSYcpQXlToZI14H4cj2jTAFWT57EEyhnnhs baLKM5kKx7CNyINySjl+r0tGPnT4w4+mynfanfczwP1e5VnBj0xdmLpi28LHiPTzZroc Rpi77AddZfb7WnCNReuybyAQ+IpHQhXryeG+Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.170.147 with SMTP id s19mr29766hbe.133.1263409765111; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:09:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> From: Andrey Kuzmin Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:09:05 +0300 Message-ID: <2a31deca1001131109s3386916ne4c8f6a45b02ad96@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > On 1/12/10 6:01 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: >> Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. >> >> We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but the >> rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm (such >> as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one datacenter. >> For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second datacenter >> based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I guess >> that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the 20% >> it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked on >> yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that big >> (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation based >> on archived data). > > Antonio: > > The point here is that if you build one logical Hadoop cluster across > two data centers, then Hadoop will consider all nodes as candidates for > receiving work regardless of which data center the job is started in. Is Hadoop's job scheduler totally NUMA-unaware? The question holds for both cross-data center scenario being discussed and or single data center as well: just imagine the usual within-rack or between-racks scheduling decision. Regards, Andrey > This means that there's no guarantees about how much data will be > shuffled between data centers (during the shuffle phase). The same is > true for the HDFS layer - there's no promise that data won't be > shuffling between data centers for replication; in fact, it's likely it > will. > > If you want to make sure compute intensive jobs run in data center A > you'll probably have better luck creating two logical Hadoop clusters, > each confined to a data center, and then simply making sure the proper > data sets are available in each Hadoop cluster. This way, there will be > no unbounded, uncontrolled data transfer between data centers and job > performance will not suffer. > > The down side is that you may have to copy data from one data center to > another if the data for job running in data center A is produced in data > center B. > > I would definitely watch the Cloudera Hadoop MapReduce and HDFS training > video[1] and look over the information on the Hadoop wiki and web site > prior to doing anything at all. It may clear a few things up. > > Also, I highly recommend the book Hadoop: The Definitive Guide by Tom > White / O'Reilly[2] if you haven't read it. It has tons of excellent > information about the map reduce process and how it works under the hood. > > [1] - http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training-mapreduce-hdfs > [2] - http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 > > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifeless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > From general-return-916-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 19:31:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24080 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 19:31:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 19:31:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 66367 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:31:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66306 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:31:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66296 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 19:31:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:31:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:31:30 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (pool-96-246-67-178.nycmny.east.verizon.net [96.246.67.178]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D048DDC380 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:31:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B4E1F7A.5060306@lifeless.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:31:06 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> <2a31deca1001131109s3386916ne4c8f6a45b02ad96@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a31deca1001131109s3386916ne4c8f6a45b02ad96@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/13/10 2:09 PM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: >> On 1/12/10 6:01 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: >>> Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. >>> >>> We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but the >>> rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm (such >>> as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one datacenter. >>> For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second datacenter >>> based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I guess >>> that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the 20% >>> it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked on >>> yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that big >>> (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation based >>> on archived data). >> >> Antonio: >> >> The point here is that if you build one logical Hadoop cluster across >> two data centers, then Hadoop will consider all nodes as candidates for >> receiving work regardless of which data center the job is started in. > > Is Hadoop's job scheduler totally NUMA-unaware? The question holds for > both cross-data center scenario being discussed and or single data > center as well: just imagine the usual within-rack or between-racks > scheduling decision. Andrey: Take a look at how replicas are assigned to data nodes[1] to see how blocks are distributed. During M/R the job tracker will assign a map task to a tracker where the input split is "as close to the data as possible." Close is either data local (where the task tracker is running on the same machine as the data), rack local (task tracker on a machine in the same rack as the data), or not local at all. What I was saying is that the third case is always possible (and undesirable). [1] http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs_design.html#Replica+Placement%3A+The+First+Baby+Steps -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-917-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 19:35:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24937 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 19:35:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 19:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 72079 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:35:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72020 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:35:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72010 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 19:35:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:35:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:34:56 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (pool-96-246-67-178.nycmny.east.verizon.net [96.246.67.178]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876A7DC380 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:34:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B4E204A.2090306@lifeless.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:34:34 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> <2a31deca1001131109s3386916ne4c8f6a45b02ad96@mail.gmail.com> <4B4E1F7A.5060306@lifeless.net> In-Reply-To: <4B4E1F7A.5060306@lifeless.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/13/10 2:31 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > During M/R the job tracker will assign a map > task to a tracker where the input split is "as close to the data as > possible." That should be: During M/R the job tracker will assign a map task to a tracker where the data as possible." Sorry. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-918-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 19:44:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27916 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 19:44:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 19:44:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 86195 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:44:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86118 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 19:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86108 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 19:44:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:44:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrey.v.kuzmin@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.213] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (209.85.220.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:44:48 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2185601fxm.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:44:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=n77ixxCB84twK0oxg/NyJ1w1I2mBQ/s3qRpV865LvO4=; b=gCKy6wO7YEoIN7qQvI5cfjk57l0nqdy6gog1lmT4uuPj7E8bKK1Mikjthopr67h76c q9hVjnsq8UASA5LaeZTTGS+3nKENyFPwZb7k9RYuiF5L2/R3+I45XTpUEfLTOoYdygZm BUYsALyxf93d3GUEQ2cGivHs4dYpbZg7j5Iyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=TVf8i+r90Tb2dFNb1ZC3FtLXQOywcoS9heb3s51WW7lyT1paHSU71jSbiFut027iEQ rFqAR6RVwaCi7RmCnSp0sjTG2zqVSmY2r47F0G0+om+M+/5WA+WcahmFIf3LpsLmkfve BQRpsuQ1oZ9/VU0KBdOm20uThQTyDmUks8q+4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.165.9 with SMTP id v9mr127048hbd.77.1263411868105; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:44:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4E1F7A.5060306@lifeless.net> References: <4B4B6AC7.6020801@lifeless.net> <4B4C9D4D.4030208@lifeless.net> <2a31deca1001131109s3386916ne4c8f6a45b02ad96@mail.gmail.com> <4B4E1F7A.5060306@lifeless.net> From: Andrey Kuzmin Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:44:08 +0300 Message-ID: <2a31deca1001131144x22b02c91s924da03543bc5995@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Running Hadoop across data centers To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regards, Andrey On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > On 1/13/10 2:09 PM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>> On 1/12/10 6:01 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote: >>>> Thanks Eric and Phil for your inputs. >>>> >>>> We have 80% of our calculation that can be done in one datacenter, but the >>>> rest is heavy calculation. We are using some time consuming algorithm (such >>>> as Monte Carlo for example) that would take too much time in one datacenter. >>>> For this kind of computation we are thinking of using the second datacenter >>>> based in Germany. We haven't done all the study about the data, but I guess >>>> that for the 80% the data will be local to one datacenter, and for the 20% >>>> it would have to be distributed across datacenter. What we haven't worked on >>>> yet, is the size of this distributed data. If looks it would not be that big >>>> (maybe less than a 1Tb but it could grow when doing some calculation based >>>> on archived data). >>> >>> Antonio: >>> >>> The point here is that if you build one logical Hadoop cluster across >>> two data centers, then Hadoop will consider all nodes as candidates for >>> receiving work regardless of which data center the job is started in. >> >> Is Hadoop's job scheduler totally NUMA-unaware? The question holds for >> both cross-data center scenario being discussed and or single data >> center as well: just imagine the usual within-rack or between-racks >> scheduling decision. > > Andrey: > > Take a look at how replicas are assigned to data nodes[1] to see how > blocks are distributed. During M/R the job tracker will assign a map > task to a tracker where the input split is "as close to the data as > possible." Close is either data local (where the task tracker is running > on the same machine as the data), rack local (task tracker on a machine > in the same rack as the data), or not local at all. What I was saying is > that the third case is always possible (and undesirable). Right, but this also means that, with NUMA-aware scheduler, a job distributed between data centers will run as good as it can be achieve wrt locality. Hence, theoretically there could be computation models where cross-data center jobs are feasible (disregarding singe name-node issue) rather than "undesirable". Regards, Andrey > > [1] > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs_design.html#Replica+Placement%3A+The+First+Baby+Steps > > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifeless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > From general-return-919-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 20:25:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39607 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 20:25:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 20:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 54581 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 20:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54531 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 20:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54521 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 20:25:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:25:06 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so15913146pzk.5 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:24:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.3.4 with SMTP id 4mr384514wfc.74.1263414285133; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:24:45 -0800 (PST) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:24:25 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001131224id806220j8100c7fd7c9c1d25@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Revote: HDFS 0.20.1/HDFS-0.20.2 compatibility To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2be27ab66b9047d118fed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636b2be27ab66b9047d118fed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Last week we had a vote regarding the compatibility problem introduced in branch-0.20 by the backport of HDFS-793, necessary for HDFS-101, which fixes a large bug in the write pipeline recovery code. The majority of people seemed to indicate that this incompatibility was unacceptable, and thus we should pull it out. However, I think everyone agrees that the bug itself is pretty critical, and it would be good to have it fixed - Hairong indicated that it's likely going to go to Yahoo's internal customers, and Cloudera would like to include it as well. In our experience we've run into it several times - whenever there are a few "bad apple" nodes in a cluster that haven't failed hard, it causes a lot of write pipeline failures (particularly, any pipeline that picks a bad node as the first node will not recover). For MapReduce it's not a huge deal, since the tasks will rerun elsewhere and usually succeed, but for applications like HBase or continuous logging to HDFS, it's a big problem. I have taken the time to develop and test a patch for branch-0.20 which goes on top of HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 but maintains compatibility with 0.20.1. I've posted this patch and a summary of my testing to HDFS-872. Although this code is tricky to get right, the hardest parts are with the thread communication and understanding the correct semantics, which I've not touched at all. I think as long as there's a good review of my patch, we should feel comfortable introducing it into branch-0.20. Thanks -Todd --001636b2be27ab66b9047d118fed-- From general-return-920-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 20:42:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44781 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 20:42:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 20:42:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 75352 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 20:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75231 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 20:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75170 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 20:42:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:42:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:42:10 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so3400744pwi.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:41:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.20 with SMTP id d20mr477882wfa.322.1263415310215; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:41:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001131224id806220j8100c7fd7c9c1d25@mail.gmail.com> References: <45f85f71001131224id806220j8100c7fd7c9c1d25@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:41:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Revote: HDFS 0.20.1/HDFS-0.20.2 compatibility From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Last week we had a vote regarding the compatibility problem introduced in > branch-0.20 by the backport of HDFS-793, necessary for HDFS-101, which fixes > a large bug in the write pipeline recovery code. The majority of people > seemed to indicate that this incompatibility was unacceptable, and thus we > should pull it out. > > However, I think everyone agrees that the bug itself is pretty critical, and > it would be good to have it fixed - Hairong indicated that it's likely going > to go to Yahoo's internal customers, and Cloudera would like to include it > as well. In our experience we've run into it several times - whenever there > are a few "bad apple" nodes in a cluster that haven't failed hard, it causes > a lot of write pipeline failures (particularly, any pipeline that picks a > bad node as the first node will not recover). For MapReduce it's not a huge > deal, since the tasks will rerun elsewhere and usually succeed, but for > applications like HBase or continuous logging to HDFS, it's a big problem. > > I have taken the time to develop and test a patch for branch-0.20 which goes > on top of HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 but maintains compatibility with 0.20.1. > I've posted this patch and a summary of my testing to HDFS-872. Although > this code is tricky to get right, the hardest parts are with the thread > communication and understanding the correct semantics, which I've not > touched at all. I think as long as there's a good review of my patch, we > should feel comfortable introducing it into branch-0.20. > > Thanks > -Todd > +1 This is a critical bug, it would have been a blocker for 20 had we known about it. Assuming your change that resolves the protocol incompatibility is reviewed and tested to people's liking I think we should put it in 20. Thanks, Eli From general-return-921-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 21:59:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85588 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 21:59:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 21:59:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23378 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 21:59:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23313 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 21:59:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23295 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 21:59:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:59:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:59:28 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o0DLwuKd062855; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:58:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=TfFTPnLbV1kXYjR2gMEt93go4EsUqGqlDUU6V7VtjBSFJAoDxr/f5FhzHes5bzPe Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:58:56 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:58:55 -0800 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Jan 20th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Jan 20th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQGvMSDFABkB1/QA== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDA1C5F26@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <73DDD9AE0462F94091EB137F8F89948956B5ABD1FE@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <73DDD9AE0462F94091EB137F8F89948956B5ABD1FE@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi=20 Agenda is now posted for next week's HUG http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/12229988/ hope to see you all there. dekel -----Original Message----- From: Dekel Tankel=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:04 PM To: 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; 'common-user@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Jan 20th at Yahoo! Hi all, Happy new year! RSVP is now open for the first 2010 Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yahoo= ! Sunnyvale Campus, planed for Jan 20th. Registration is available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/12229988/ Agenda will be posted soon. Looking forward to seeing you there Dekel From general-return-922-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 23:36:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33468 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 23:36:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 23:36:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 18211 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 23:36:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18158 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 23:36:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18147 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 23:36:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.213] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (209.85.220.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:36:25 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2406847fxm.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:36:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=z4zXGZ9luw6+eF7TXa+s+cG5ly8j2+aTcjgJ69T3wGQ=; b=hux2MOIUPC3E+B99Oon+/bXncvTNsGxNbe/cCiDAKf2RWqIEiTEakcMthfyOCaZJTM /UZ3XBtQ5XiKeZt67f8BKov7sT3aLN0bgsllxgv10S9fQ1NgsYAKqjglFR8FX/NuypPm qd0m5KiOoI2NU3hhNF7NQBY2/SOv3larcDrv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XNxaBBf8mWLDRedoV18bch11IUtFL40wQFMI38yr8FUA6HTumrtfC8rFYDavnWn+pn A095Du4io/6lV3QJSdI2uIkSl3oH8rL1CfYakx1RqWDGIcPQWBXZizKFZsWd+w8E5tE7 HTVsO1zkmCXTHauF4TlfN7c9F6gWz44f1gU34= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.85.28 with SMTP id n28mr386075mul.121.1263425763719; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:36:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b62a6d8bc98047d143b09 --0016e65b62a6d8bc98047d143b09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being focused in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic Algorithms Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; but I have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be useful for community: Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It only talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and so) talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppose is used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) and CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the process?. Have you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. Thanks a lot in advance. -- Alberto --0016e65b62a6d8bc98047d143b09-- From general-return-923-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 13 23:44:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37337 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 23:44:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 23:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 31958 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 23:44:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31895 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 23:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31885 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 23:44:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:44:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.213] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (209.85.220.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:44:48 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2412203fxm.29 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:44:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xSJ9i07NDs/8S2dmIgDEFwgtr0Yz01xhULsR3jaQTnE=; b=L8wHvuy58yMmlZ/FDwIJJ86WYuFAfV74Ky2BQKiUXRwNYHQ4BWcOTLaF2tuZhSfQ8p BcD9W3+anXHwKqbr47qtz20PRyU88bEwB/0VRW5h1NAC2GcS3O6aBlqhySdoH4L8oCq7 Wq6oBFLLMGs8si69QtG2MwlJTp2iUyQ1Mm/2g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PTP5vlO+8zxiFU4pszWDhI1/mQMyJQnZBoLEzma5ShAeUDuWUocZMu+FAchl/Y3HO1 YdxzuGIW86WvoL5Wz/t177rVTvbaxWvbqNAnyv5YJvZEN5mIoK0P2TCaeS52rpl5MIal mKKBiE/2HtMnKWnr4/pNK8WU5rDUFgFW4zIfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.186.199 with SMTP id i7mr777665hbh.44.1263426265597; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:44:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:25 -0600 Message-ID: <3c682ecd1001131544x43180d70i1992a0ab237dd8f1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f92230c2feed047d145985 --001485f92230c2feed047d145985 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Alberto, The paper considers only selecto-recombinative genetic algorithms as mentioned in Section III.A. The mutation operators could be done on the reduce after the crossover or before it as required. Elitism can be implemented by emitting the individual with a different value in the map and then directly writing it to context in the reduce. If you are up for it, we could collaborate together to work on your problem. Hope this helps. -Abhishek. On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being focused > in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic > Algorithms > Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; but I > have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be useful > for community: > > Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It only > talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and so) > talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppose is > used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its > representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) and > CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. > > How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the process?. > Have > you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > -- > Alberto > --001485f92230c2feed047d145985-- From general-return-924-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 14 00:30:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56511 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2010 00:30:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 00:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7782 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 00:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7699 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 00:30:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7679 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2010 00:30:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:30:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:29:59 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o0E0T4jn092298 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:29:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=ULtCP7mLjk0+K2dkzoQKqSV/NSepdTZgakP+3bqb2nNMH0c/+NcxnK6sFrfHgKOF Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.86]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:29:04 -0800 Received: from 10.72.112.100 ([10.72.112.100]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:28:49 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:28:47 -0800 Subject: Re: Revote: HDFS 0.20.1/HDFS-0.20.2 compatibility From: Hairong Kuang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Revote: HDFS 0.20.1/HDFS-0.20.2 compatibility Thread-Index: AcqUsIks2tQGzoCHOkC4T6rEj1F2/w== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2010 00:29:04.0434 (UTC) FILETIME=[93904120:01CA94B0] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Todd for taking the initiative to get the compatibility issue resolved. I will review the patch. +1 Todd's proposal on the condition that HDFS-101, 793, and the compatibility fix are well tested. Hairong On 1/13/10 12:41 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Last week we had a vote regarding the compatibility problem introduced in >> branch-0.20 by the backport of HDFS-793, necessary for HDFS-101, which fixes >> a large bug in the write pipeline recovery code. The majority of people >> seemed to indicate that this incompatibility was unacceptable, and thus we >> should pull it out. >> >> However, I think everyone agrees that the bug itself is pretty critical, and >> it would be good to have it fixed - Hairong indicated that it's likely going >> to go to Yahoo's internal customers, and Cloudera would like to include it >> as well. In our experience we've run into it several times - whenever there >> are a few "bad apple" nodes in a cluster that haven't failed hard, it causes >> a lot of write pipeline failures (particularly, any pipeline that picks a >> bad node as the first node will not recover). For MapReduce it's not a huge >> deal, since the tasks will rerun elsewhere and usually succeed, but for >> applications like HBase or continuous logging to HDFS, it's a big problem. >> >> I have taken the time to develop and test a patch for branch-0.20 which goes >> on top of HDFS-793 and HDFS-101 but maintains compatibility with 0.20.1. >> I've posted this patch and a summary of my testing to HDFS-872. Although >> this code is tricky to get right, the hardest parts are with the thread >> communication and understanding the correct semantics, which I've not >> touched at all. I think as long as there's a good review of my patch, we >> should feel comfortable introducing it into branch-0.20. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> > > +1 > > This is a critical bug, it would have been a blocker for 20 had we > known about it. Assuming your change that resolves the protocol > incompatibility is reviewed and tested to people's liking I think we > should put it in 20. > > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-925-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 14 05:16:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37977 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2010 05:16:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 05:16:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 3020 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 05:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2942 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 05:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2932 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2010 05:16:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:16:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.217] (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:16:26 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so7994653ewy.11 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:16:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.14 with SMTP id z14mr111922wee.25.1263446163308; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:16:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5a921af21001100009g27cd859dw4aa80a99fac24d3b@mail.gmail.com> References: <995905631001091134h39a703a6u1f962d551f7025a@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001092216l58ff0226he5d4047d2bd9538@mail.gmail.com> <5a921af21001100009g27cd859dw4aa80a99fac24d3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:16:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: about translating Hadoop:The Definitive Guide into chinese one From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks everyone for the interest in translations of the book. There is a Chinese translation coming out very soon. Cheers, Tom On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:09 AM, xiao yang wrote: > We can create a project on Yeeyan (www.yeeyan.org). > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Qian Ye wrote: >> So am I, although i'm just a novice to hadoop. I worked on a project bas= ed >> on the Zookeeper these monthes. I would like to make some help for the >> Chapter 13, if need. >> >> thx~ >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: >> >>> Hi Wang=EF=BC=8C >>> >>> I am very interested in this. This book really help me a lot when I go = deep >>> into hadoop. >>> Maybe I can help with chapter 11 Pig. I am now pig's committer. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Wang >> >wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, you guys >>> > >>> > I am interested in Hadoop very much and using it in my current projec= t. I >>> > find this book, Hadoop:The Definitive Guide, is a useful and practica= l >>> > introduction for new coming Hadoop users. As, there are also many >>> > applications using hadoop here in china, many more people would like = to >>> > know >>> > what hadoop is and what it can do and how it works. So, maybe transla= ting >>> > one technical book about it into chinese will be helpful. >>> > >>> > I am working on with my friend and just finish =C2=A0for chapter1 and >>> chapter6. >>> > The most important thing i'd like to know is whether you guys think t= his >>> > job/work will be useful or helpful? >>> > >>> > I will appreciate your suggestions very much! Thanks! >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards >>> >>> Jeff Zhang >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With Regards! >> >> Ye, Qian >> Made in Zhejiang University >> > From general-return-926-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 16 10:48:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45540 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2010 10:48:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2010 10:48:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5517 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2010 10:48:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2010 10:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5411 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2010 10:48:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:48:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.213] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (209.85.220.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:48:39 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so901029fxm.29 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:48:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+W5ZvZr/fZm5mFcHg9QpO9RJkgJC7WhfFg0u21VsYNQ=; b=n+vR/Gbpzw9yVe+B+xRwN1+moLy3LP/3z4rdrzOwLwLPUt1iH5YaOVaEAgPkhWq1rB k2REwIqJqSFpYKHljyimWkM+DKPrsIOS6mOrRNE/E4vOaSFOrf1xE58pZUNPXs4sJdMj aj8SMQmorwqximXAuWYMtmEd66lVGmY8avaNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uM1cZ/5hKkh+I3zGnMCof81xiPPbgrzuTkm01Sa5nVzGJgTeNUi4kkFqXy4UxwWzrE ESqUDZ8dHKOug84I2Iho0cNrLzCtZ7QH3ufsEsuSz+R87BmbIpXKxyoGYAlvzgrnZkLQ CYaUCltCSnkUFDTITK6U1yMPSh6c9EBQPvluI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.84.27 with SMTP id m27mr1690447mul.19.1263638899096; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:48:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd1001131544x43180d70i1992a0ab237dd8f1@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> <3c682ecd1001131544x43180d70i1992a0ab237dd8f1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:48:19 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01001160248y7a2a605fua4009c7af1ad8932@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65aee2ab47da9047d45db14 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65aee2ab47da9047d45db14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Abhishek Verma. Your help would be very appreciated. I=B4ll try to implement your suggestions and feed them back if successful. Regards. 2010/1/14 Abhishek Verma > Hi Alberto, > > The paper considers only selecto-recombinative genetic algorithms as > mentioned in Section III.A. The mutation operators could be done on the > reduce after the crossover or before it as required. Elitism can be > implemented by emitting the individual with a different value in the map > and > then directly writing it to context in the reduce. > > If you are up for it, we could collaborate together to work on your > problem. > > Hope this helps. > -Abhishek. > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being > focused > > in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic > > Algorithms > > Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; but= I > > have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be usef= ul > > for community: > > > > Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It on= ly > > talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and so) > > talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppose = is > > used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its > > representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) and > > CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. > > > > How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the process?. > > Have > > you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. > > > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > --=20 Alberto --0016e65aee2ab47da9047d45db14-- From general-return-927-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 17 08:58:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53145 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2010 08:58:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2010 08:58:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 74522 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 08:58:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74448 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 08:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74438 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2010 08:58:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:58:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alex.baranov.v@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.216] (HELO mail-gx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.217.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:57:55 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1878400gxk.11 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/+yOIIrIVkCVH9TxSrksinAUPMtDXDdmdqnB6iFc37Y=; b=uzBlWH9ZQEd/LnxrDtfcCVjwil+K1/9By1S4OQZDrNFgrV3dq4kbiuu7FrqJf2axP4 s1BOgXHIwkSDIGhWZGaiInY40s2SgPQmQu773T0ihyTPPMWmexxW7JhT5yND1uxA6r0f MyqA0OqxfRWCfIH1pJaJLtSNN36k6o+rWrtE4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XWeYbpRoXv6UaI62yTH5FJ5bA2n6Uckh712YPsKicV8ylc+roP+6qpfT03MIMP75i9 DvmdMoDXSP4orB9k4GygkDjBQD8YH3yjcHJgguHEnFWzCMNHURayh3XFnPNLFoAb8SFF LMWxx5yZ545+JokZBxkI9fAONx7ig++wapIB0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.147.27 with SMTP id z27mr7521729ann.62.1263718654356; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:57:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <35dbe9101001170057l4e3fb0f8yc1ca9ebf4f1c7c7c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Alex Baranov To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68debd67d2dbb047d586dc0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68debd67d2dbb047d586dc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I've read the paper and here is my question: Why not just produce pairs (random int, individual with fitness) from Map function? Thus individuals will be shuffled randomly after Map phase and there won't be the need to override the partitioner. Alex. P.S. Mentioning GFS in "An accompanying distributed file system like GFS [8] makes the data management scalable and fault tolerant." can confuse some readers because the paper is based on Hadoop family (and further HDFS name used). On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being focused > in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic > Algorithms > Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; but I > have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be useful > for community: > > Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It only > talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and so) > talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppose is > used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its > representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) and > CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. > > How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the process?. > Have > you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > -- > Alberto > --0016e68debd67d2dbb047d586dc0-- From general-return-928-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 06:03:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57770 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 06:03:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 06:03:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 6307 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 06:03:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6138 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 06:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6128 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 06:03:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:03:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhangyf14@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:02:57 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1997268pzk.2 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:02:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nXYd/zztNGa4XkoiuEtntzcQ82ys9L4BDRx0RPqlDHk=; b=WA/ZNlNriyuyZHyVJEypDvkQnrxM2UGefJOvnqY8xp1QhdBCHcGqpSyqGkuKnCMX78 /1ghkPLqUvNOeoAgd7FVGghE5dIAtP6gnJsKI8BxXm7KSUPeFeuVMU53WLGjCSiM0rKP lY8c0DovECPAcPbIkBAKILvFPEm7mipCRNcoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rDEZ3WTTFafZWCE2qV87AaNxUD54ojSsjcN1AU+w+T25WZI946MP3l+Jq09Ff1qkCl 4mGwcSSih21wCLq046RLI0809uN5JvjdJXpxBJ5+uYhxQBKZVfXm/x8pa8Boio0H9chO iDEX2c6yqGB8Uyc0K0n2fDisoY1cOrij6cZvg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.133.4 with SMTP id k4mr433540wan.4.1263794557113; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:02:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:02:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: add worker nodes when job is running From: Yanfeng Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e648be3aa5557a047d6a191c --0016e648be3aa5557a047d6a191c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, all I want to implement this. 1. In a 10-nodes cluster, there is a job J1 running on 5 nodes, at the same time there is another job J2 running on the other 5 nodes. 2. Then J1 finishes earlier and J1's 5 nodes join to work on job J2, so we have 10 nodes working for J2. Could anyone tell me how to implement it? Thank you very much! Regards, --0016e648be3aa5557a047d6a191c-- From general-return-929-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 06:10:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59895 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 06:10:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 06:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11939 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 06:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11829 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 06:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11819 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 06:10:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:10:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:10:11 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2000819pzk.2 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:09:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vh0jlCe90fehbKy83TH3/iyye+WdWUH2Ou80+Bla59E=; b=hkCpisgoH66wa7rMgRZ4LhbmfFa5H8FAIYOFX3xgiK1EQ2qDB/2HPYeudj0Y7K89wa iN5OJ9/E0AIvVJo03Eo3aA5PHVQbAHO1FGVAq62t78dSoIBpX+VQ1D86bkBPUdWrCGrM sAxVjOEYcyBqPh0UcRxqc/GhXKU/na8Y6frn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J7OlGHyasC+cBV3GgB3TaprKOCmBaUjDSjIiyGv3CLwjHUZtdnEscH0iOwR4Yd6x6N lGeXmJw+DPcgKE/GubvFmPx6oneaT5eyMmgdoF/v/qX0DfoYU1T+AYac2GBUGAe0CVLD +pq06Rhm/Ltn9PRYCaGFlJpLLXKkQV+TaudFk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.209.20 with SMTP id h20mr3874861wfg.130.1263794990419; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:09:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:09:50 +0800 Message-ID: <8211a1321001172209x45d46cc2k4c1b9895cd0ac3e6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: add worker nodes when job is running From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32e2e790df9047d6a338d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd32e2e790df9047d6a338d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't think you need to do extra anything, the Sheduler on JT will do it for you. When there's node becoming free, Scheduler will assign new task to these nodes. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Yanfeng Zhang wrote: > Hello, all > > I want to implement this. > 1. In a 10-nodes cluster, there is a job J1 running on 5 nodes, at the same > time there is another job J2 running on the other 5 nodes. > 2. Then J1 finishes earlier and J1's 5 nodes join to work on job J2, so we > have 10 nodes working for J2. > > Could anyone tell me how to implement it? > > Thank you very much! > > > Regards, > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang --000e0cd32e2e790df9047d6a338d-- From general-return-930-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 07:21:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88278 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 07:21:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 07:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 50450 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49816 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49797 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 07:21:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:21:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:21:33 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so3138364ewy.29 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:21:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YX8XZz07ujvTypACOrE7l4kNtibbv+Gf5vF3JPggM/Y=; b=SpgSTkviDJX0ztMWQQ0JXkDH0E+7uHDfafooTmMex9yv7qZb5bvM+2ZRbodB1P1Ymo u1rY19VjUoV+ieUkvj7nCpoz4EkyDTdQ8wzto5IH2+DtYsI78kjPI3jAMKpcXkE+K76Y uWkzPJ5Eot8HzRgjbeT4x3qLdw+qyI8VU+FM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WCnlqgd3cpqY2RF+m8wXnSDDHLkIYkfoVKD8d1VeBE+UlEgxdzkH/Ec+pYSjfg+RRo ei7vsu0LzlWx4quG1EAK+I2sPvCUDcQdEuL9dBuStlx6dpygRpO9aMQj9EI2DlAWXYiy HCCrJHFC+3V2DT0wEqy/DKzs/4vrYyFW6IOFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.141 with SMTP id e13mr1749916wef.166.1263799273090; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:21:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:21:13 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001172321m5a444625vdf13937e12a23552@mail.gmail.com> Subject: How do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2d81bd6eb7047d6b3258 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6db2d81bd6eb7047d6b3258 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I read the documentation about running multiple Mapper tasks, but I can't get multiple Mappers to work. I am running under EC2 with 10 nodes. Here's what I know: 1) I guess, by default, No. of Mapper tasks will be decided by DFS block size, but I would like to override that. My file is small, but each line triggers fairly long running complicated calculations that should be run in parallel. 2) I tried setting the following property in the mapred-site.xml (only on Master), but that doesn't seem to help: mapred.map.tasks 10 I still see the following message: 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 (Also, I know for fact that multiple mappers are not running!) 3) I read somewhere that JobConf has a method called setNumMapTasks, but this class has been deprecated, and as such I am not using. Besides this method just provides a hint to Hadoop, I heard. So how do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Please let me know. Thanks. --0016e6db2d81bd6eb7047d6b3258-- From general-return-931-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 07:30:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89694 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 07:30:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 07:30:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 57259 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57169 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57151 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 07:30:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:30:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:30:10 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so1678447pwi.29 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:29:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4pPMypGVKg3h9ai2DLOyu4nODciTuQFMxEULUhVp7Uc=; b=xcrRBdukcEJLywS295U169oKmrieeI2qB1bAvZF34polsq+q73z/VPgbvD19YZpoh0 e65d7Kz1Bx2Zn2l6OJYjScQU8Nnq9ur8CJOCmk17JdY/fHU4xUjyCNd6Y3cfYS6broNv 5F6GBI/HFeOKeYPPAqCyOx4XWhj4WARR+B9mc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ovXvdNXcxmiQAubQlGjNTS0z4XbWAHoCbesRuoaYCP409TB+EPZpMEFci2zCGTK9Nq Ezn1VdfMr9pb4PMFMy9TGdWlxYK/DA+1tdd/SCunpg4bDueg28fK2tn2wBWa4ToTLyEu WnswrnRbv9/OfurHUDcBxCUX8lGHgTlXtS8Z0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.5.30 with SMTP id 30mr3873444wfe.115.1263799789821; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:29:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001172321m5a444625vdf13937e12a23552@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001172321m5a444625vdf13937e12a23552@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:59:49 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df21001172329l4242810ag2a278fd02d01a59@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b09c8a1e30047d6b51b6 --00504502b09c8a1e30047d6b51b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 you can set *mapred.max.split.size* property in mapred-site.xml to create more splits and map tasks. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I read the documentation about running multiple Mapper tasks, but I can't > get multiple Mappers to work. I am running under EC2 with 10 nodes. > > Here's what I know: > > 1) I guess, by default, No. of Mapper tasks will be decided by DFS block > size, but I would like to override that. My file is small, but each line > triggers fairly long running complicated calculations that should be run in > parallel. > > 2) I tried setting the following property in the mapred-site.xml (only on > Master), but that doesn't seem to help: > > > mapred.map.tasks > 10 > > > I still see the following message: > > 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > (Also, I know for fact that multiple mappers are not running!) > > > 3) I read somewhere that JobConf has a method called setNumMapTasks, but > this class has been deprecated, and as such I am not using. Besides this > method just provides a hint to Hadoop, I heard. > > So how do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Please let me know. Thanks. > -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, Impetus Infotech (india) Pvt Ltd. --00504502b09c8a1e30047d6b51b6-- From general-return-932-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 07:46:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92486 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 07:46:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 07:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 67988 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:46:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67876 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 07:46:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67853 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 07:46:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:46:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 07:46:23 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o0I7joG7028263; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:45:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic: thread-index:message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:mime-version; b=GYarWCAzIQHs0sBukN+TfbuXPpN0X0X2xTvLFnCV2F4dMB3WMyE7ltbmm0uvTATd Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:15:49 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:15:48 +0530 Subject: Re: How do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Thread-Topic: How do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Thread-Index: AcqYDvS+z4IR3NCwRwm8GkvzEEqB8QAA0sFm Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001172321m5a444625vdf13937e12a23552@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C77A0F84FA43amarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C77A0F84FA43amarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Changing the audience to mapreduce-user. Setting the number of map tasks (mapred.map.tasks or JobConf.setNumMapTasks= ()) does not guarantee that number of maps in the job will be set to that. = It will only be used as a hint. Number of maps is decided by your InputForm= at. You should implement InputFormat.getSplits() to define how the input sh= ould be split. The fact is "number of splits is equal to the number of maps= ". If you are using default InputFormat (i.e. TextInputFormat), number of maps= is decided by DFS block size. If you use NLineInputFormat with mapred.line= .input.format.linespermap=3D1, number of maps will be number of lines in th= e file. More details @ http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/J= obConf.html#setNumMapTasks%28int%29 Thanks Amareshwari On 1/18/10 12:51 PM, "Something Something" wrote= : Hello, I read the documentation about running multiple Mapper tasks, but I can't get multiple Mappers to work. I am running under EC2 with 10 nodes. Here's what I know: 1) I guess, by default, No. of Mapper tasks will be decided by DFS block size, but I would like to override that. My file is small, but each line triggers fairly long running complicated calculations that should be run in parallel. 2) I tried setting the following property in the mapred-site.xml (only on Master), but that doesn't seem to help: mapred.map.tasks 10 I still see the following message: 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=3D1 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=3D1 (Also, I know for fact that multiple mappers are not running!) 3) I read somewhere that JobConf has a method called setNumMapTasks, but this class has been deprecated, and as such I am not using. Besides this method just provides a hint to Hadoop, I heard. So how do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Please let me know. Thanks. --_000_C77A0F84FA43amarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-933-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 13:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11418 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 13:56:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 13:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 26045 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 13:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25964 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 13:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25954 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 13:56:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:56:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [15.193.32.62] (HELO g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com) (15.193.32.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:56:25 +0000 Received: from G6W0640.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w0640.atlanta.hp.com [16.230.34.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g6t0185.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D3E241A8 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G5W0325.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.228.8.67) by G6W0640.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.34.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:55:30 +0000 Received: from GVW1114EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.228.24.170]) by G5W0325.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.228.8.67]) with mapi; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:55:30 +0000 From: "Day, Phil" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:55:29 +0000 Subject: DFS Recovery with fsck Thread-Topic: DFS Recovery with fsck Thread-Index: AcqYA+hoCHROLS2nRlKZiHU1Zl5jWAAQNjpg Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, Can anyone help me with the following please: I have a 20.1 cluster where I've been doing some testing on recovering from= various namenode failure scenarios. The current problem I've managed to create is where some directories and th= e files within them were deleted, the cluster then stopped, and the edits f= ile lost. On restart dfs stays in safemode as there are blocks missing (the image kno= ws about the directories, the datanodes don't have the blocks for them). = Fsck correctly identifies the missing blocks. I then take dfs out of safe mode and run "fsck -delete" (to get rid of the = corrupt files). After that a further fsck run reports the filesystem as h= ealth (and a ls shows the directories as empty). However if I now stop the cluster and restart it, it comes back into the sa= me state. It's as if the results of the "fsck -delete" aren't persisted. Any thought on what's happening, and what I need to do to tidy up, would be= very welcome. Thanks, Phil From general-return-934-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 18 17:27:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89337 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 17:27:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 17:27:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 57205 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 17:27:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57064 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 17:27:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57038 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 17:27:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:27:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:27:42 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so488981eye.23 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:27:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xBz4Gl1mgusFDqSmkEP/730U5I85/K4dU2jCNakybjE=; b=UeSzryuQO0C04zpD1CzpPat+fnj31tWckmIXXksY+JElk7LTsC4JcJIupRg/tyMgnB JAnco/2zO5+c7kI+TR4FRMHlRbrGmjEStlxNqr04uzMg6AvvV+ZSO/03/1N57yhtyEZk B28nJli2kD2G1sUkZ+oHTwP64Qo5VR5+65unk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ffDZXAIsmO0r0e/B4CPciz+hbGB04yKwyUqx69OYgk6AzCfbpwMdpTtwI7vIcN5nKJ 0cHu7qNVsqgobosCBR4YiXzJ4qHSqKYaJrlKsVx7ELP+/zo7FBv1bKGthv3q3Kk1corR 1erBQPHmP6w/RtfuzhpUGgQhXjrbG5utOxQtE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.16 with SMTP id v16mr80336wee.162.1263835639993; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:27:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1eabbac31001172321m5a444625vdf13937e12a23552@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:27:19 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001180927y73a1a8c9n8ef7058023bfc48a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d588b960561a047d73aa17 --0016e6d588b960561a047d73aa17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the replies. The NLineInputFormat uses JobConf which has been deprecated so I would rather not use that class. But I looked at the FileInputFormat which has the following method: FileInputFormat.setMinInputSplitSize(job, 100); I thought if I set InputSplitSize to 100, for every 100 lines in the input file a Mapper would be triggered. My input file has 500 lines, so I was expecting to see 5 Mappers, but only one Mapper is triggered. Please help. Thanks. On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu < amarsri@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > > Changing the audience to mapreduce-user. > > Setting the number of map tasks (mapred.map.tasks or > JobConf.setNumMapTasks()) does not guarantee that number of maps in the job > will be set to that. It will only be used as a hint. Number of maps is > decided by your InputFormat. You should implement InputFormat.getSplits() to > define how the input should be split. The fact is "number of splits is equal > to the number of maps". > If you are using default InputFormat (i.e. TextInputFormat), number of maps > is decided by DFS block size. If you use NLineInputFormat with > mapred.line.input.format.linespermap=1, number of maps will be number of > lines in the file. > More details @ > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobConf.html#setNumMapTasks%28int%29 > > Thanks > Amareshwari > On 1/18/10 12:51 PM, "Something Something" > wrote: > > Hello, > > I read the documentation about running multiple Mapper tasks, but I can't > get multiple Mappers to work. I am running under EC2 with 10 nodes. > > Here's what I know: > > 1) I guess, by default, No. of Mapper tasks will be decided by DFS block > size, but I would like to override that. My file is small, but each line > triggers fairly long running complicated calculations that should be run in > parallel. > > 2) I tried setting the following property in the mapred-site.xml (only on > Master), but that doesn't seem to help: > > > mapred.map.tasks > 10 > > > I still see the following message: > > 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > 10/01/18 01:56:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > > (Also, I know for fact that multiple mappers are not running!) > > > 3) I read somewhere that JobConf has a method called setNumMapTasks, but > this class has been deprecated, and as such I am not using. Besides this > method just provides a hint to Hadoop, I heard. > > So how do I trigger multiple Mapper tasks? Please let me know. Thanks. > > --0016e6d588b960561a047d73aa17-- From general-return-935-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 12:35:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9218 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 12:35:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 12:35:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 77398 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 12:35:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77307 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 12:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77297 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 12:35:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.179.145] (HELO web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.179.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:35:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 25362 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Jan 2010 12:34:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1263904490; bh=Y2rD6bbWywQ6hQby+6ac3s6aa3xLq8oBeQOQxDbHHZk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Cal5EfZWI0Krvz/fFExAjnX4u2Mr814DvGwPanNBZjBlFkDhe2IYvVKxaNAiLGAz1NYlD2zerMfIDzGh6OW9XkCjz1EKuE/EU1+K1YotllZxSaNT0A8XBUmaEU3PcefiVUB1wv7TTwk7A9flG3z3PqlqJfZJ6JbKsNfnbzl9K78= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N+hdVbxRekbFavSu+3I6p/3wPCOhntXQksirmY1JByMTO2O90StivIkR9LbBwv7/cGPLW1wYBtuHaSBV5JiiebYAFQi4dY3C2zKxh9u3UZENdD5kdFT+KIykHSZeboOTgJ+swFdGpOuoBbIagcvTu43fNNOIji5Uc11BGJg3I1Q=; Message-ID: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: TskDoGwVM1lK1lklfZmGerwXJ8u2101Dh3hcEv5GKGxYhJOf3INLX7ptY7EAfoe.soBHxDJOKeNPG2eV3GYyGKWCkjTNykNMNU_XOPMlLPSd2wv6l4Lb6yksuTxN_vqJLJpYA9KGv7PbHjLi3nMiiafUk_nyGp51BkA7iDq9g9o2kTtE1zATLiLGGrRS8Ln23EUqC2ZoHF0ktNCJ.Av5HaGjiY.60ZzkokrmCrc2f7f3UiUb6xYCeirlR_YImOXjNBT2bEpaSGXUAQU5NvDGLW4MCu8qjBL1frD63AFJn0B0bhDae4.UwBtaYrizi96G8aZD_kj8K6vKgeS9vBI0jULbob5yGOpamOW6nEtsOjnmFjFhneqz8fxyHQ8F0WoO8_PFBuN.Ou0DBfB26zXYBJr9fFJbxkMplRoblvrQE1Kw_BaO9NmhF6v0YVEZMzywxiEZTEyfxgwj5MnCH8BuVC_qDhjViPlDDxRFxkYxjhBP9VGGXBcJsn023M73HO_M_Epb76pU8jpEoBnc2cyFHQtI3F1rgS3KQP2QlJhobP._W9zf5tVWUhyor9xoUnyMdAMdxo0d4J8Uk1fhFRABn2.ciA8YREgVYSKZN.z9 Received: from [115.186.16.168] by web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:34:50 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:34:50 -0800 (PST) From: ZUBAIR MIAN Subject: Problem with datanode(slave machine) To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-754832029-1263904490=:25346" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-754832029-1263904490=:25346 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all=0A=0AI=A0am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave). In the log = file of slave i am getting following message: =0A=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0= =A0 "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: java.net.N= oRouteToHostException: =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 No route to host=A0at = org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException"=0AI am currently working on two= node cluster. The network is working fine. Both machines can ping each oth= er.=0A=0AAnd Following is the log file of datanode.=0A=0A=0A=A0STARTUP_MSG:= Starting DataNode=0ASTARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 host =3D slave/192.168.0.2=0ASTARTU= P_MSG:=A0=A0 args =3D []=0ASTARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0 version =3D 0.20.1=0ASTARTUP_= MSG:=A0=A0 build =3D http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/rel= ease-0.20.1-rc1 -r 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep=A0 1 20:55:56 UTC 2= 009=0A************************************************************/=0A2010-= 01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to s= erver: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:5= 0:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: mas= ter/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 I= NFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: master/192.16= 8.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.ap= ache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: master/192.168.0.1:5431= 0. Already tried 3 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoo= p.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already= tried 4 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Clie= nt: Retrying connect to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 5 t= ime(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retryi= ng connect to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s).=0A= 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect= to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s).=0A2010-01-15= 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server= : master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:51:05,= 445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: master/1= 92.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s).=0A2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException: Call = to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: java.net.NoRouteToHo= stException: No route to host=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapExce= ption(Client.java:774)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.jav= a:742)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220)=0A=A0= at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc= .RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.= java:346)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383)=0A=A0at = org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:314)=0A=A0at org.apache.had= oop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:291)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.serve= r.datanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269)=0A=A0at org.apache.had= oop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216)=0A=A0at org.apa= che.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283)= =0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNod= e(DataNode.java:1238)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNo= de.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server= .datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368)=0ACaused by: java.net.NoRouteTo= HostException: No route to host=0A=A0at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkC= onnect(Native Method)=0A=A0at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(So= cketChannelImpl.java:592)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout= .connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUti= ls.connect(NetUtils.java:404)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connecti= on.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Con= nection.access$1700(Client.java:176)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.g= etConnection(Client.java:859)=0A=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Cli= ent.java:719)=0A=A0... 13 more=0A2010-01-15 18:51:05,451 INFO org.apache.ha= doop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: =0A/*********************= ***************************************=0ASHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataN= ode at slave/192.168.0.2=0A************************************************= ************/=0A=0APlease help me asap.=0A=0Aregards=0Amaria=0A=0A=0A=0A = --0-754832029-1263904490=:25346-- From general-return-936-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 13:10:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24737 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 13:10:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 13:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 18763 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 13:10:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18701 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 13:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18691 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 13:10:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:10:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:10:19 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so4911264pxi.5 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:09:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uDuH40U90U/mMuPOo+Fhjm58vgVyV5qeNwy71ziPESE=; b=AxpSq2JxnrHxierBFAudBE+LBAEvzdR+JTL/atCL4pMuJlayQCil7HqZjYrxLru2Ou bEUh3+YjWFyJWnObaqvAO4zVJyqK3j+8+JEPSPtxfRfZgu7TCi9GkGXrZP7eX+OHKvCv kocagz+obtjWL3sQdBSgzaihzh0jNFa5FFPRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=am9Zxl25ywjfLHQ6IqQ+KpPQ96fJa5rbqfBPYmYMpuLQe0z7AR50DJHRsduO+qN66A 8My4eKttjXLdyqIteZ6ixFLZUC+QQdnHdHUe8vS25ryE2CPQsD4hgCXACmiQplF/x32S fctim/edgABrE0Fnnmr/mYbTtmK19pXLZWceM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.107.3 with SMTP id j3mr2130902rvm.271.1263906597783; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:09:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:09:57 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd137beca4b43047d842fa9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd137beca4b43047d842fa9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts. It may work. On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN wrote: > Dear all > > I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave). In the log file of slave i > am getting following message: > "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException" > I am currently working on two node cluster. The network is working fine. > Both machines can ping each other. > > And Following is the log file of datanode. > > > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > STARTUP_MSG: host = slave/192.168.0.2 > STARTUP_MSG: args = [] > STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.1 > STARTUP_MSG: build = > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc1 -r > 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException: Call > to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:314) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:291) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:592) > at > org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719) > ... 13 more > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,451 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2 > ************************************************************/ > > Please help me asap. > > regards > maria > > > > --000e0cd137beca4b43047d842fa9-- From general-return-937-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 14:18:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59536 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 14:18:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 14:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12386 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 14:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12301 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 14:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12291 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 14:18:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.179.141] (HELO web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.179.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:18:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 17289 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Jan 2010 14:17:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1263910679; bh=DdXwBaqdI+Cu1tG+33dodwpYNrmhnh07XZ2lh572YW0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w/vW7K50caddags3Q+IoA1iw6FvHJPq12swcxO6QbGSWxStVWaJvfuYYWkkFyhmehEt7spk+XJZkbXF68OmoB9Y/BKGXt0U5Zqhl6ad3KySoPy1K0alKvqjpt6W3s352AQujYmMq2sW4EKVlt0tV8XhCzO3cuNAMPqNvze09uS8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=51SjLEWGkT9aSuqIzyMmfafC+7C2BCjcGTqEFmCia40J3btGQcOU2O9jDHLmRnwk93Tq9EK8Dk9H8HzhCLFG7MR8Ahkyh2y2jEqWCOGn3jnCKINr0Ml8/HQGijVzoKmNqSejU6SVpNyzq+D5SKdlpE7v4+UJ5SoI441V83bCeXM=; Message-ID: <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: g5MbopsVM1m4Ms58SeHuIH2XEgokFz73yVv0zQo5D2buyF2muAu3LyEx3G2MWRdKsWPz1i5jIfMpAx0_uRxEIC0nt.6EwhqkggqmHOjxgChHDeXR.pJHdEdF1v853rSCJmeS1i9dIzutICIQ_Ie_0ssealwcgBQRVue7xJsTUuhiU3iz9JEfvfXdkeqSAyGJhpz8i9fmhcgQSCoV08jOUpelpYktL0iKDLWKiTgxF3ViPPzTj38YBSpZUxBk7sF8JkMrcPLtZ0c4lRLZCMQoF.wdb0b98p9N5dW8d3WzUTjst40tuTyC1CDi3eb36R.7G7AsmxVly8GNrXqqijwLbYcWy7FSjZbmzRXL1cDWxnhoT2zSRNkXUeQpT4nN.BbQ4xFKiZzxDjeP7yLCtrU1nknKTWnH_MlPXukglwzMV581NpPxxnaI6xgvbKGdJqdOyJWxmX5xYQj9OrpH6t7XWgM5bdLmcC5OcUhJgwWVmPnRbbBfyW2VJQnPqRMZmlYPZJgeAx6Lqyx5cJFa2wbDdvSG_lOgUKuKUhtjahP9z75fF19oJBNfvv.xPZIHBcgDc._2TatmFOMF.5U4GmoGB6isGRfuDLT1lWdS.GKw9nhA.ElYRnJkLV13E0ImjgVZGdgMTX9bwyBLOmjde14xS82NavKZjF4EvZSjQO1rI2aq07SY_ykSM1ONoAfUGzVH9TJjGLNekYhCRpo.vmqW8ZEoCUHREUDAcyFSxiFFaMwihEeY_gekJnSxTAaYEzqan9hpePy4GRvF65vYxX.bGtcBTGaWS7Jue2GTqAI2OjJtDpkumM6ZLN0_LYBFY0JShyhdjiffbBqB02bEiTZ5YB97nLmk_AGmiuEAjshaTHVpr0uay5oOr03xAtlWgr6pzLTAWpvpDa2UFavYh1Pu.piNwkHSZgGDMot_TS9o1LmkfauUuxkudOvzlfIJ_qJ2gqo.yHdzl9JQiiKkH x95NWHybBT1JO_ZBrg- Received: from [115.186.13.188] by web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:17:59 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:17:59 -0800 (PST) From: ZUBAIR MIAN Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-902127744-1263910679=:16459" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-902127744-1263910679=:16459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have already done that.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFr= om: xiao yang =0ATo: general@hadoop.apache.org=0ASe= nt: Tue, January 19, 2010 6:09:57 PM=0ASubject: Re: Problem with datanode(s= lave machine)=0A=0AAdd hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts.=0AIt may work.= =0A=0AOn Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN = wrote:=0A=0A> Dear all=0A>=0A> I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slav= e). In the log file of slave i=0A> am getting following message:=0A>=A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exceptio= n:=0A> java.net.NoRouteToHostException:=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 No route to = host at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException"=0A> I am currently = working on two node cluster. The network is working fine.=0A> Both machines= can ping each other.=0A>=0A> And Following is the log file of datanode.=0A= >=0A>=0A>=A0 STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode=0A> STARTUP_MSG:=A0 host =3D sl= ave/192.168.0.2=0A> STARTUP_MSG:=A0 args =3D []=0A> STARTUP_MSG:=A0 version= =3D 0.20.1=0A> STARTUP_MSG:=A0 build =3D=0A> http://svn.apache.org/repos/a= sf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc1 -r=0A> 810220; compiled by 'oom' o= n Tue Sep=A0 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009=0A> **************************************= **********************/=0A> 2010-01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.= ipc.Client: Retrying connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Alrea= dy tried 0 time(s).=0A> 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.= Client: Retrying connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already t= ried 1 time(s).=0A> 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Clie= nt: Retrying connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried= 2 time(s).=0A> 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: = Retrying connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 t= ime(s).=0A> 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retr= ying connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4 time(= s).=0A> 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying= connect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 5 time(s).= =0A> 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying co= nnect=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s).=0A>= 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connec= t=0A> to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s).=0A> 201= 0-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect=0A= > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s).=0A> 2010-01= -15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect=0A> to= server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s).=0A> 2010-01-15 = 18:51:05,449 ERROR=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: jav= a.io.IOException: Call=0A> to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exce= ption:=0A> java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=0A>=A0 at org.= apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774)=0A>=A0 at org.apach= e.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.R= PC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220)=0A>=A0 at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknow= n Source)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)=0A>=A0= at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.h= adoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.wa= itForProxy(RPC.java:314)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(R= PC.java:291)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.= startDataNode(DataNode.java:269)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.serve= r.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hado= op.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283)=0A>=A0 at= =0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(Da= taNode.java:1238)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Data= Node.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdf= s.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368)=0A> Caused by: java.net= .NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=0A>=A0 at sun.nio.ch.SocketChanne= lImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)=0A>=A0 at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.fi= nishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:592)=0A>=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.net= .SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206)=0A>=A0 at org.ap= ache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404)=0A>=A0 at org.apache.ha= doop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304)=0A>=A0 at org.ap= ache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176)=0A>=A0 at or= g.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859)=0A>=A0 at org.apa= che.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)=0A>=A0 ... 13 more=0A> 2010-01-= 15 18:51:05,451 INFO=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: S= HUTDOWN_MSG:=0A> /*********************************************************= ***=0A> SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2=0A> *****= *******************************************************/=0A>=0A> Please hel= p me asap.=0A>=0A> regards=0A> maria=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-902127744-1263910679=:16459-- From general-return-938-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 18:41:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5967 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 18:41:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 18:41:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 13764 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 18:41:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13703 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 18:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13693 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 18:41:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:41:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:41:44 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so5400318pxi.5 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:41:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.10 with SMTP id y10mr964622wfi.114.1263926484095; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:41:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:41:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DFS Recovery with fsck From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > Hi All, > > Can anyone help me with the following please: > > I have a 20.1 cluster where I've been doing some testing on recovering fr= om various namenode failure scenarios. > > The current problem I've managed to create is where some directories and = the files within them were deleted, the cluster then stopped, and the edits= file lost. > > On restart dfs stays in safemode as there are blocks missing (the image k= nows about the directories, the datanodes don't have the blocks for them). = =A0 Fsck correctly identifies the missing blocks. > > I then take dfs out of safe mode and run "fsck -delete" (to get rid of th= e corrupt files). =A0 After that a further fsck run reports the filesystem = as health (and a ls shows the directories as empty). > > However if I now stop the cluster and restart it, it comes back into the = same state. =A0 It's as if the results of the "fsck -delete" aren't persist= ed. > > Any thought on what's happening, and what I need to do to tidy up, would = be very welcome. Hey Phil, Just to confirm, after restarting after the fsck -delete you can hadoop fs -ls the directory you deleted and the files have returned? It sounds like the edits generated by fsck -delete are getting lost. When you shutdown after the fsck -delete are all copes of the fsimage and edits the same (assuming you've got multiple fs.name.dirs)? Seeing the namenode edit log before/during the fsck -delete and on restart would be helpful. Thanks, Eli From general-return-939-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 18:43:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6738 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 18:43:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 18:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15639 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 18:43:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15553 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 18:43:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15536 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 18:43:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:43:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:43:04 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so2789756pwi.29 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.4.22 with SMTP id 22mr2096068wfd.127.1263926562443; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DFS Recovery with fsck From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Seeing the namenode edit log before/during the fsck -delete and on > restart would be helpful. Sorry, meant to say "namenode log" not "namenode edit log" Thanks, Eli From general-return-940-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 19:39:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21852 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 19:39:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 19:39:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 82636 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 19:39:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82564 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 19:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82554 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 19:39:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:39:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:39:11 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so2830130pwi.29 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:38:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=UfWacV5H52JSp0hNAO3dmeiYZa73+RTyrt6cWBhZG/U=; b=qyO0drBBMCz2XEf+05dlbufffpd0jpZfMJSxxL+cZ3qf234ehFEsZqoILhxO6Dw0Sw UPTEo7uT5K+4HHfFO460Neera5NKRp8jPmd8SgJr0tgPMJFaTGzwgaf6xFXmisctDCah Mjhn/wv1OzllSB1BZKxRRTAj57yIxK9mDVknU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hvDADJ6DgrtvYg9rNxvGUtPC8AehFAgWgAUPTGkcgW/XU4h/hDS7rDTkYacYnSeT1i OEfDisZmUeBmk1ku2vAbwwCTfAGQ5p5+q+euTZUGcBlGPMfuHlWbnxlRpWk8/TTkNeio Q00sf6yo48180dMmqw1Bo4QflnLLHGt0mGmDU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.33 with SMTP id u33mr4903663wfh.113.1263929930055; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:38:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:38:50 -0800 Message-ID: <17e273101001191138w4e358d1cja26bc20793d30e26@mail.gmail.com> Subject: splittable encrypted compressed files From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cc62808096047d899e17 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502cc62808096047d899e17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I experimented with hadoop-lzo and liked it. Our requirement is changing and we may need to encrypt data files. Does anyone know of splittable encrypted compression scheme that map task can use ? Thanks --00504502cc62808096047d899e17-- From general-return-941-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 19:55:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25433 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 19:55:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 19:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1571 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 19:55:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1493 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 19:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1483 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 19:55:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:55:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Joseph.Travaglini@fmr.com designates 192.223.198.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [192.223.198.27] (HELO maillnx-us112.fmr.com) (192.223.198.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:55:43 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fmr.com; i=Joseph.Travaglini@fmr.com; l=5734; q=dns/txt; s=2009-03-17; t=1263930942; x=1295466942; h=x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version:content-type: subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to: return-path:x-originalarrivaltime:x-filenames; z=x-mimeole:=20Produced=20By=20Microsoft=20Exchange=20V6.0 .6619.12|content-class:=20urn:content-classes:message |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20multipart/alternativ e=3B=0D=0A=09boundary=3D"----_=3D_NextPart_001_01CA9941.5 4388090"|Subject:=20Google=20Patent=20on=20MapReduce |Date:=20Tue,=2019=20Jan=202010=2014:55:19=20-0500 |Message-ID:=20|X-MS-Has-Attach:=20 |X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:=20|Thread-Topic:=20Google=20Patent =20on=20MapReduce|Thread-Index:=20AcqZQVUvwewdiv0KTKGANU9 yX2ox5A=3D=3D|From:=20"Travaglini,=20Joseph"=20|To:=20 |Return-Path:=20Joseph.Travaglini@FMR.com |X-OriginalArrivalTime:=2019=20Jan=202010=2019:55:19.0953 =20(UTC)=20FILETIME=3D[5449D810:01CA9941]|X-filenames:=20 None; bh=j60EYsfLgkcAePWFORvvHjlga2UBpgpjSYCwr5FGYHU=; b=qT/OZOpktZfg49TR/79giElFUj5TB1AXUcazMTEE6wwjTH/UFyM02NWA C2G8aLQpQk4iqki9Ppxa8bgNKInaZ0smkxCOMdA1A8rEhEc9Tu1kQfS+R zWzLqu7/3EQsqmk1JCawj++htC3EWIPlQXiEZv7SBhCxwJoRMlnw+CM7J Q=; X-filenames: None Received: from msgmrosm01win.dmn1.fmr.com ([172.26.7.127]) by maillnx-us112.fmr.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from MSGMROIV01WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM (172.26.31.106) by MSGMROSM01WIN.dmn1.fmr.com (Sigaba Gateway v4.1) with ESMTP id 302009737; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from MSGMMKIM01WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM ([172.25.108.46]) by MSGMROIV01WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM with SMTP_server; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:20 -0500 Received: from msgmrocln2win.DMN1.FMR.COM ([10.37.181.15]) by MSGMMKIM01WIN.DMN1.FMR.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:19 -0500 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6619.12 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA9941.54388090" Subject: Google Patent on MapReduce Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:55:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Index: AcqZQVUvwewdiv0KTKGANU9yX2ox5A== From: "Travaglini, Joseph" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2010 19:55:19.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[5449D810:01CA9941] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9941.54388090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=3DPTO1&Sect2=3DHITOFF&d=3D= PALL &p=3D1&u=3D%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=3D1&f=3DG&l=3D50&s1=3D7,650,= 331.PN.&OS=3D PN/7,650,331&RS=3DPN/7,650,331 =20 The USPTO granted a patent to Google today for MapReduce, after several rejections. I'm no patent expert; how does this affect Hadoop? ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9941.54388090-- From general-return-942-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 20:43:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39284 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 20:43:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 20:43:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 81621 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 20:43:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81542 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 20:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81532 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 20:43:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:43:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 209.85.216.204 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of peter@motally.com) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:43:46 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so5583302pxi.5 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.124.7 with SMTP id b7mr5723556rvn.8.1263933804465; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:43:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:43:24 -0800 Message-ID: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce From: Peter Sankauskas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325564d6a6f4f0f047d8a8591 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325564d6a6f4f0f047d8a8591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have heard that Google generally get patents to protect themselves rather than to enforce them. Google don't have any publicly available way to make money off of map-reduce (even Google App Engine does not map-reduce capability yet) so I would imagine they would be fine with Hadoop. Fingers crossed. Kind regards, Peter Sankauskas Motally, Inc Office: +1 (415) 932-6898 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Travaglini, Joseph < Joseph.Travaglini@fmr.com> wrote: > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL > &p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,650,331.PN.&OS= > PN/7,650,331&RS=PN/7,650,331 > > > > The USPTO granted a patent to Google today for MapReduce, after several > rejections. I'm no patent expert; how does this affect Hadoop? > > --000325564d6a6f4f0f047d8a8591-- From general-return-943-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 22:58:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 738 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 22:58:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 22:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 56482 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 22:58:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56399 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 22:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56389 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 22:58:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:58:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:58:38 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so866791eye.5 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:58:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NzUowKAOVU4/AK/8TEvjnKImpgCtXuGj18BM8a5ugxk=; b=X/CbL4IppUJS0oC3KHlztG9lKsyU4WjDnDvu1gOxRhF/osHGy6M/B7rZaBu56KghYi G2F9+rt2vG9rkLmbH8BmnmrF9Ck3mqGeSm1DUX5naC4h/QqK4dFAXKbbIkosTRLBnzzE CHZJzXYoAckazJxwlL3sUQp+6XKqXpT0l0tKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=g2JLJYq17weUor1BO6DTV7lQgRnEUMtBdsL/wtaFoiqDO2d/F5KSskRwL6qtUv+6mr MUNeoX9UQQ6uiWF6r86Kdn+wyOirYoz/0qy+Py4rjnB0wtlo/3GBtA2aeaibjL+uKna4 +iEBv6XUsEkrWy2JWA62G9PdKnZDtXnHo9ex8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.107.13 with SMTP id z13mr2677951ebo.68.1263941897453; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:58:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d01001160248y7a2a605fua4009c7af1ad8932@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> <3c682ecd1001131544x43180d70i1992a0ab237dd8f1@mail.gmail.com> <309f76d01001160248y7a2a605fua4009c7af1ad8932@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:58:17 -0600 Message-ID: <3c682ecd1001191458w1299b99bhe68acbd57e2c268e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d2a1d082ae047d8c67c9 --00504502d2a1d082ae047d8c67c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alberto, If you need it, I can send you the source code that I used for the paper I wrote. Do you have any conference in mind for this idea? Thanks, -Abhishek. On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Abhishek Verma. Your help would be very appreciated. I=B4ll try to > implement your suggestions and feed them back if successful. > Regards. > > 2010/1/14 Abhishek Verma > > > Hi Alberto, > > > > The paper considers only selecto-recombinative genetic algorithms as > > mentioned in Section III.A. The mutation operators could be done on the > > reduce after the crossover or before it as required. Elitism can be > > implemented by emitting the individual with a different value in the ma= p > > and > > then directly writing it to context in the reduce. > > > > If you are up for it, we could collaborate together to work on your > > problem. > > > > Hope this helps. > > -Abhishek. > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being > > focused > > > in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic > > > Algorithms > > > Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; b= ut > I > > > have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be > useful > > > for community: > > > > > > Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It > only > > > talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and s= o) > > > talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppos= e > is > > > used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its > > > representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) and > > > CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. > > > > > > How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the process= ?. > > > Have > > > you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. > > > > > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alberto > > > > > > > > > -- > Alberto > --00504502d2a1d082ae047d8c67c9-- From general-return-944-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 23:00:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1349 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 23:00:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 23:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 58826 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 23:00:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58756 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 23:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58746 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 23:00:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:00:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.27] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:00:24 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so807501eye.23 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g67DCjd/KjloQEyDDeQJWLZBHfu3GymVrxafnLfl4zI=; b=xImC56nCVpnLgJsXt607FYNcEJFqbBodMVf8rfePNjbwkxM2NQuuBENSg9ztRiPjEf WiQHwz/4h2fdcQs/RGsZqVgwas922zYhGkhJ9W3JXHNYCKdm7lbAWXZw8OBSRz9QE73L ylhBjMyKfdEWMEWDgqvOaJg/6fnDqRRjKNIW4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PCTq7xozWuMR5O9JljES9F+//F5fmYTtQOetDHIwjj1v3ePJZ+dQ98pAkB5JtDXfQl Hfg1ei4h1JIJhDIyHPv0Lw1opDiYbpXnsae/AH+6NFmYxywbKzwb4ofImIF68hpR2o1l FwmtQq/LKXUoA7lyatC5e1xZ/Mdgt95kYEHfs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.97.83 with SMTP id k19mr105738ebn.29.1263942002437; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd1001191458w1299b99bhe68acbd57e2c268e@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> <3c682ecd1001131544x43180d70i1992a0ab237dd8f1@mail.gmail.com> <309f76d01001160248y7a2a605fua4009c7af1ad8932@mail.gmail.com> <3c682ecd1001191458w1299b99bhe68acbd57e2c268e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:00:02 -0600 Message-ID: <3c682ecd1001191500u205b529ekfe34a7b329420b4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce00482126cdf047d8c6eb0 --000e0ce00482126cdf047d8c6eb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apologies for spamming everybody. -Abhishek. On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Abhishek Verma w= rote: > Hi Alberto, > > If you need it, I can send you the source code that I used for the paper = I > wrote. Do you have any conference in mind for this idea? > > Thanks, > -Abhishek. > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Abhishek Verma. Your help would be very appreciated. I=B4ll try to >> implement your suggestions and feed them back if successful. >> Regards. >> >> 2010/1/14 Abhishek Verma >> >> > Hi Alberto, >> > >> > The paper considers only selecto-recombinative genetic algorithms as >> > mentioned in Section III.A. The mutation operators could be done on th= e >> > reduce after the crossover or before it as required. Elitism can be >> > implemented by emitting the individual with a different value in the m= ap >> > and >> > then directly writing it to context in the reduce. >> > >> > If you are up for it, we could collaborate together to work on your >> > problem. >> > >> > Hope this helps. >> > -Abhishek. >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < >> > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi everyone! For the last six months. my work with Hadoop is being >> > focused >> > > in developing a stable MRPGA. Last paper I read ("Scaling Genetic >> > > Algorithms >> > > Using MapReduce") was a fantastic job and gave me a bunch of ideas; >> but I >> > > have some questions relative to this paper and I think they may be >> useful >> > > for community: >> > > >> > > Anywhere in the paper talks about elitism rate nor mutation rate. It >> only >> > > talks about selection and crossover. In fact, this part (page 3 and >> so) >> > > talks about an INDIVIDUALREPRESENTATION(key) function, which I suppo= se >> is >> > > used to represent the key part of the par (i.e., if it is Text, its >> > > representation is a String). Also there are TOURN(tournArray) (?) an= d >> > > CROSSOVER(crossArray), which I think is related to mutation. >> > > >> > > How it is supposed to be implemented the mutation part in the >> process?. >> > > Have >> > > you considered some kind of elitism rate for chossing population?. >> > > >> > > Thanks a lot in advance. >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Alberto >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Alberto >> > > --000e0ce00482126cdf047d8c6eb0-- From general-return-945-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 19 23:12:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3748 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2010 23:12:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2010 23:12:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68071 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 23:12:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67988 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2010 23:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67978 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2010 23:12:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:12:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:12:06 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so809826eye.23 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:11:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8uylb579N+7VYqn6gI1M2fKgJDnsq/mVDc5FaGdtlxA=; b=rrGB968GyxApjTV70KmbCCwQJCXgRYVMqEzTLVTG0tljYl3DwwXzsHt7Uvk/INtyH0 NlnF5jHPEwxABfvto4c7PNb+C0hRomc/ItW7P7jjWRbev1aFFQ39LuWPcmRbnTzUomrB ncXbAFHG25jckXOxLTo8KblR27SP8DnIfqD48= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=G8wzNZaradw+zZ4/0hJfoiU9YBvfh5YJL3xozd8TaWOfKkJWvQOa2+LUf+TwU8b4z5 jWyONzWRSI+E7pOOCOFmWAZh80cphEfQjsWdlnbaJNPGKDwEziCKsatyik3SB7Pj5yfE UHn0DeBjHCq0TJBJmunPpid9iPUqdxHmrpM7E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.100.153 with SMTP id y25mr148172ebn.76.1263942705646; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:11:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <35dbe9101001170057l4e3fb0f8yc1ca9ebf4f1c7c7c@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d01001131536x5c4d3e66xa9a67457719967ac@mail.gmail.com> <35dbe9101001170057l4e3fb0f8yc1ca9ebf4f1c7c7c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:11:45 -0600 Message-ID: <3c682ecd1001191511w271e08e4x3cad9f73cbbe61e3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SCALING GENETIC ALGORITHMS USING MAPREDUCE From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b640fc8d68047d8c973a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b640fc8d68047d8c973a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Alex, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Alex Baranov wrote: > Hello, > > I've read the paper and here is my question: > > Why not just produce pairs (random int, individual with fitness) from Map > function? Thus individuals will be shuffled randomly after Map phase and > there won't be the need to override the partitioner. > That is a neat trick and would work. P.S. Mentioning GFS in "An accompanying distributed file system like GFS [8] > makes the data management scalable and fault tolerant." can confuse some > readers because the paper is based on Hadoop family (and further HDFS name > used). I tend to use MapReduce and GFS through out the paper and then mention Hadoop and HDFS in the implementation section as a concrete example. I apologize if the paper didn't make that clear. -- -Abhishek. http://verma7.com --001636c5b640fc8d68047d8c973a-- From general-return-946-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 08:51:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80523 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 08:51:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 08:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 15471 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 08:51:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15385 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 08:51:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15375 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 08:51:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:51:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.175] (HELO mail-pz0-f175.google.com) (209.85.222.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:51:26 +0000 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so387454pzk.30 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:51:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RlqJBdgXRztWyHHTPrkry40UUYGU+zBh4fmPE6XP8W0=; b=dTR9EcXWtS6gAbN5Pa/BtjKflHR1hJA39f3LF51akY9tMTANcgTW/KWh30Yu/QAU6O Une9hUJWrSbAF/Wveyqmgvw+P0tC7vEltvWZp4XEk2TzRkcsfjbFr2A33pg9SdbqgOkl OuBPt4XUeN15Aw0FRDlmvoUmqqy8KkgwY1gPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DpxHDlgcC1xfl8Wq317xWPdxedcqSId/zOVlMATBRa8aQqRcolhpTpowDoV1wNbcjy jnaCwIlJnyuwbwMOkMXsfN2sBZDagynWyFuSF4qdb+SVEGK2+PkmriJxa6uiZY9hQEyD OK7IRSWGuBoUaN+Td83Ew4l+pcMXsum9xvgCI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.101.21 with SMTP id d21mr2642362rvm.41.1263977464033; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:51:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:51:04 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1383ebf729a047d94af10 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1383ebf729a047d94af10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Maybe the firewall blocked this port. Try: $telnet 192.168.0.1 54310 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN wrote: > Have already done that. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: xiao yang > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 6:09:57 PM > Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) > > Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts. > It may work. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN > wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave). In the log file of slave > i > > am getting following message: > > "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host at > > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException" > > I am currently working on two node cluster. The network is working fine. > > Both machines can ping each other. > > > > And Following is the log file of datanode. > > > > > > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > > STARTUP_MSG: host = slave/192.168.0.2 > > STARTUP_MSG: args = [] > > STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.1 > > STARTUP_MSG: build = > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc1 -r > > 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009 > > ************************************************************/ > > 2010-01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > connect > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException: > Call > > to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > > at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:314) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:291) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368) > > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > > at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:592) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206) > > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719) > > ... 13 more > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,451 INFO > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > /************************************************************ > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2 > > ************************************************************/ > > > > Please help me asap. > > > > regards > > maria > > > > > > > > > > > > > --000e0cd1383ebf729a047d94af10-- From general-return-947-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 09:06:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85028 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 09:06:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 09:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29618 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 09:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29540 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 09:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29530 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 09:06:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.66 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.66] (HELO szxga03-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:06:27 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWJ009QNFWG2M@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:05:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWJ00LKMFWFAF@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:05:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWJ004Z4FWFLH@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:05:03 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:35:02 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: debug MapReduce task running on a cluster To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <002901ca99af$a73cb2e0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_fuIU1XZiO0UTndWMWvaoPw)" Thread-index: AcqZr6ZeddEW+lU+QFO7l6MAv9phhA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_fuIU1XZiO0UTndWMWvaoPw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi All, I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. I was trying to find ways to debug a MapReduce task running on a cluster. However, I was not able to get something concrete and precise. It would be great if anyone can help me on the same. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! --Boundary_(ID_fuIU1XZiO0UTndWMWvaoPw)-- From general-return-948-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 14:36:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16549 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 14:36:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 14:36:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 42268 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 14:36:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42164 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 14:36:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42154 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 14:36:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:36:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:36:06 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o0KEYdai040886; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:34:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=jHsIXx8Aw8XVHboDtIbOBVVYmQKmuOPcCTGu9NapSsktAZw02JsnHzl/P4L9Do+M Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:04:38 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "naveenkumarp@huawei.com" Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:04:35 +0530 Subject: Re: debug MapReduce task running on a cluster Thread-Topic: debug MapReduce task running on a cluster Thread-Index: AcqZr6ZeddEW+lU+QFO7l6MAv9phhAALglzb Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002901ca99af$a73cb2e0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C77D1253FC17amarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C77D1253FC17amarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToDebugMapReducePrograms http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Isolation= Runner and http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Debugging Thanks Amareshwari On 1/20/10 2:35 PM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" wrote: Hi All, I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. I was trying to find ways to debug a MapReduce task running on a cluster. However, I was not able to get something concrete and precise. It would be great if anyone can help me on the same. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= - ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender b= y phone or email immediately and delete it! --_000_C77D1253FC17amarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-949-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 17:52:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96962 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 17:52:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 17:52:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 24398 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 17:52:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24356 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 17:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24346 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 17:52:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:52:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.179.140] (HELO web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.179.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:52:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 28953 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2010 17:52:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264009942; bh=fmnUpNAfCeKdtclWPfQPYm6VgQJ58gRpjYpCE9N9gaM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k0JXp1HHUCZsGJsmI23wIrLEGm4i298loXja06YDnqw0qnlH0xw/tuVpN2/+FZBsoX2iFJl+q0dhr9eKtlQepc/+QGYxxDepaNVJzi4w+bwVlXEmM8h4Gj2CUM/+CSuo9DsSXnvfaDfcN7Egdg/CP4dXaN4AnNK4WOD6c1ppbiM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3vWePvizn+zmF9PaBOR0HRMN9laJ+94m3iU10PilhaH58CRihtbae7hzEnHL80dA5Mg70nf2BCgqhbQnm3MhTv0vIHckywCdHNsMVZY3rbEydAsKUVq5Kf3oCiDH/ROKZBWHpCjpbO3D0anGoh7uVY4F+oiZq3TGeSkNd4403sI=; Message-ID: <987434.28638.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: lpozDKYVM1n9fsdYMW8iQLPlsxlSyTyUU9zcKIRV7HY2NQ12QvexlBivazFPHKDl4Avbz9wPbCWWV19jQA3KtalC9MS_z7rzYIt3PPEf1p8TdNXRAhBAD.Ge4UX5GhHtcxL2ByL3QUsNpTbmv3aunL45JaHMko2t59ef3OoFqZtAccprQBEJKbOHlah4oseWOhkhDRulBilC1H1hoM8H80u2tgCBV8Tdr2FSYIfPLo_pwX__CPXxrBGMyupX.bjWmbCbl4OuicJ5YXPrE4h4RyBxmqJ4poLMN70Fm5pVNDiHAGhhM3WNoGnKPbywVGrmbY6eS5PRFnponRj.xZUp1Sujr0NrX.79_3vsJoEMnkkUYGRFVBMLhzlsPsvuiWlo2v12ChQmRCWXLPbIX9KQgU.EOTXB3a1Sk4LdwoOtIhYwAj7jyCMvVRKiL9d0TDoZYAWAICZHqMdatWLRTlXajN.uwS1gd.ww75ka6ljznWDYM.otuRUoVFEBMfWx_8viGaXqbyluDauNJnzs3BmCcXSM79KQAwUzZWkLZ4ZnRTtWlLzuYIv.1HRlD.n1eymCQ4GRqsKm172m0wetomkdXZ9JMQdr_Ax.wjIGp8aFWpv.rO0KgHYHhTJ0MmQ8jruP2S0ushiAqmXhfH90DnF9NzI_9jsQ5hR9Eu620iusaKeKvwsxBDJkYY8CpYtOH6TF8xX7hSlXtTm4gEo6y.QDmaud3m3sxTaf5E77qgT9lOFP6qSGw4x0mzboluTqf.v4KwsAfJ9VlA5UDYhyvRCn_C3.6GNLFOfWY_0VlVC77RudA2SrLm7tvCEyj0fCR7lHZ0NR7s.RpMoFSChXV4e9XrvZaBv8mbarK.LIpUdaX3PkAuPg7sP3JWmeBpgEzBOZAeIJkVdYuRybIXs3Rh6.otJ66FIQ224k1rDdHXEUXbfSF3tRpISwn9n67LY45tWh0t1vSPk9_72ObOxrC LTmoXGYk3JqG0MVQ7A- Received: from [115.186.6.43] by web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:52:22 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:52:22 -0800 (PST) From: ZUBAIR MIAN Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-28795546-1264009942=:28638" --0-28795546-1264009942=:28638 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Still giving me the same error=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A______________________________= __=0AFrom: xiao yang =0ATo: general@hadoop.apache.o= rg=0ASent: Wed, January 20, 2010 1:51:04 PM=0ASubject: Re: Problem with dat= anode(slave machine)=0A=0AMaybe the firewall blocked this port.=0ATry:=0A$t= elnet 192.168.0.1 54310=0A=0AOn Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN = wrote:=0A=0A> Have already done that.=0A>=0A>=0A>= =0A>=0A> ________________________________=0A> From: xiao yang =0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Sent: Tue, January 19, 20= 10 6:09:57 PM=0A> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine)=0A>=0A>= Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts.=0A> It may work.=0A>=0A> On Tue, J= an 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN =0A> wrote:=0A>= =0A> > Dear all=0A> >=0A> > I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave).= In the log file of slave=0A> i=0A> > am getting following message:=0A> >= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local e= xception:=0A> > java.net.NoRouteToHostException:=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 No = route to host at=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException"=0A> > I = am currently working on two node cluster. The network is working fine.=0A> = > Both machines can ping each other.=0A> >=0A> > And Following is the log f= ile of datanode.=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=A0 STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode=0A> > = STARTUP_MSG:=A0 host =3D slave/192.168.0.2=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 args =3D [= ]=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 version =3D 0.20.1=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 build =3D= =0A> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc= 1 -r=0A> > 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep=A0 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009=0A> = > ************************************************************/=0A> > 2010-= 01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect= =0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s).=0A> > = 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> con= nect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s).=0A= > > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A>= connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s)= .=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying= =0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 tim= e(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retr= ying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4= time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: = Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tri= ed 5 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Clie= nt: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already= tried 6 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.= Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Alr= eady tried 7 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.= ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310.= Already tried 8 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.had= oop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54= 310. Already tried 9 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR=0A> > org= .apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException:=0A> Call= =0A> > to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception:=0A> > java.ne= t.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ip= c.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.C= lient.call(Client.java:742)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.i= nvoke(RPC.java:220)=0A> >=A0 at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)= =0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)=0A> >=A0 at o= rg.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hado= op.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.wai= tForProxy(RPC.java:314)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(= RPC.java:291)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.= DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> > org.apache.hado= op.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> = >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode= .java:1283)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Da= taNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.ap= ache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246= )=0A> >=A0 at=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(Da= taNode.java:1368)=0A> > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No rout= e to host=0A> >=A0 at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Meth= od)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChanne= lImpl.java:592)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTim= eout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ne= t.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc= .Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.h= adoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176)=0A> >=A0 at org.ap= ache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859)=0A> >=A0 at org.apach= e.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)=0A> >=A0 ... 13 more=0A> > 2010-0= 1-15 18:51:05,451 INFO=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: SHUTDOWN_MSG:=0A> > /***************************************************= *********=0A> > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2= =0A> > ************************************************************/=0A> >= =0A> > Please help me asap.=0A> >=0A> > regards=0A> > maria=0A> >=0A> >=0A>= >=0A> >=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-28795546-1264009942=:28638-- From general-return-950-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 17:54:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98541 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 17:54:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 17:54:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 29253 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 17:54:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29176 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 17:54:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29166 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 17:54:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:54:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.179.140] (HELO web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.179.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:54:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 29723 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2010 17:53:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264010020; bh=+Ib424HlhcFFDM5QCCIQJnVR2hAzqYqIqcm5pmGeFRM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vzjHxOzOAQDchpR3QFKWVlLYe/Ym6sqwRJVtFCC5bglVdlwenpFuVA0D16qQQ80WjnKRersaSL53bSVGhry5XUFcbeJvR187Bif1P9Vqu3mqE6WNMeaPCjERpdTLFCMja7MNx2HjyuRyfDsmAE5t0mcY2mcIFwH5NBsbPYbB720= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f6LsXsZbhHmYD/8bMixl4g5Dp8AW0ZHuoto5piuhq10eH6hA2IyffQUMxfXueDvaHsfvIpnx8PsO1r/ezvDZIrr7xtoz/HpkJpmFX+Ehg7qlqxr+Vy1gmw4I3zPaCB0n9XTvf51JNshB0DzHr5aYvcQRW+hfgoBVRPu0lExEZqU=; Message-ID: <586024.28687.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Z_XcLREVM1lEQfjL1JXEPg08A2K4YYduabmLZdlHCVwjm8qWUsAb9Oly6a95lI8VV1dRY3muY3h3Dy4Ao2C8VYD3.nRVPjPO_lKIIs1YtMgoAjng45PFj5n5LHbnRlRLnA5s4ugc9u85We3P1xyZ9h30hjFC1u_2mJ9Z4IeS.Pj3SsI.h_t9w1bpWILcfy2TE6C5254aM1ZrSbuyml02FcbEEXMlAxqOInvBQBhvAOqX3LqlyjxEFMYt8yrTm34G8iezSQEga.aLT0P8eau2Nu1jLPMCbtDjVdpMfXHcjRMA4eSrFRBgUC7IIHLnZMzgKLrxUHaVVt.qH7cPiIOAZ3Ocp9qwgY8mwB6JIrY0tLRZHMUC91GSTEhacz3iqhfo8hfxZ37dzsYZhzWBsDasMxojmE3oBuE8RVS8NuotQP4lkoZgMCPlxW1Tb6hWMMZIxUUMGpzYPzRVfyz1sbOtLaYXos9moNPGkiJGdjSRYDDTofSL2mxyZQgRUfHH5SK80fjH9IBDc6RFz6K76v2XYC.LERj4epmvTuDQo_xa8I9M_c0fwGCTQ7fDVQY1uYdIhpKh0WxHfEOTi5ayb0mP4aiuzuVuLBVe.6qaXroaSy805Cb8k9aHhF3DN5FaxuMd8CglZbOSTsZA7_IQ94J_VBCzRKm.TJGnaTuxfUavs94PVptxHizdX.WwA2xEvU3uR9J2Ijg3lQd_2eJ1l3PRCI9v7I4UHz5hIgTGR.0BGGqzndnL07NQ0NIcE_FsCIEpkOa6aA7XS05ElG8ihaYxn53SlL3zT2GLVsxufHRSbBAw4vu73DjOUEN0aF0c1MY3KjdHUhJKHLcLbxzw.EAEaiq3g3muA7m.Jw_Rx0AOIn1QVAr7WpV_hiq7tOVfvLtLEtcehLIiWHMJqPN.hqGUMChWyA8lmqO8B6lyzUjl830LWi3OovVaa8T_KgDDX1FZ407WthIC Received: from [115.186.6.43] by web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:53:40 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:53:40 -0800 (PST) From: ZUBAIR MIAN Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-993381238-1264010020=:28687" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-993381238-1264010020=:28687 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Still giving me the same error=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A______________________________= __=0AFrom: xiao yang =0ATo: general@hadoop.apache.o= rg=0ASent: Wed, January 20, 2010 1:51:04 PM=0ASubject: Re: Problem with dat= anode(slave machine)=0A=0AMaybe the firewall blocked this port.=0ATry:=0A$t= elnet 192.168.0.1 54310=0A=0AOn Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN = wrote:=0A=0A> Have already done that.=0A>=0A>=0A>= =0A>=0A> ________________________________=0A> From: xiao yang =0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Sent: Tue, January 19, 20= 10 6:09:57 PM=0A> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine)=0A>=0A>= Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts.=0A> It may work.=0A>=0A> On Tue, J= an 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN =0A> wrote:=0A>= =0A> > Dear all=0A> >=0A> > I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave).= In the log file of slave=0A> i=0A> > am getting following message:=0A> >= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local e= xception:=0A> > java.net.NoRouteToHostException:=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 No = route to host at=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException"=0A> > I = am currently working on two node cluster. The network is working fine.=0A> = > Both machines can ping each other.=0A> >=0A> > And Following is the log f= ile of datanode.=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=A0 STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode=0A> > = STARTUP_MSG:=A0 host =3D slave/192.168.0.2=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 args =3D [= ]=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 version =3D 0.20.1=0A> > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 build =3D= =0A> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc= 1 -r=0A> > 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep=A0 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009=0A> = > ************************************************************/=0A> > 2010-= 01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect= =0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s).=0A> > = 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> con= nect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s).=0A= > > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A>= connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s)= .=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying= =0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 tim= e(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retr= ying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4= time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: = Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tri= ed 5 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Clie= nt: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already= tried 6 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.= Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Alr= eady tried 7 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.= ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310.= Already tried 8 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.had= oop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> connect=0A> > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54= 310. Already tried 9 time(s).=0A> > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR=0A> > org= .apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException:=0A> Call= =0A> > to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception:=0A> > java.ne= t.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ip= c.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.C= lient.call(Client.java:742)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.i= nvoke(RPC.java:220)=0A> >=A0 at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)= =0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)=0A> >=A0 at o= rg.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hado= op.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.wai= tForProxy(RPC.java:314)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(= RPC.java:291)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.= DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> > org.apache.hado= op.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> = >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode= .java:1283)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Da= taNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.ap= ache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246= )=0A> >=A0 at=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(Da= taNode.java:1368)=0A> > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No rout= e to host=0A> >=A0 at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Meth= od)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChanne= lImpl.java:592)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTim= eout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ne= t.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404)=0A> >=A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc= .Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304)=0A> >=A0 at org.apache.h= adoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176)=0A> >=A0 at org.ap= ache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859)=0A> >=A0 at org.apach= e.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)=0A> >=A0 ... 13 more=0A> > 2010-0= 1-15 18:51:05,451 INFO=0A> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNod= e: SHUTDOWN_MSG:=0A> > /***************************************************= *********=0A> > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2= =0A> > ************************************************************/=0A> >= =0A> > Please help me asap.=0A> >=0A> > regards=0A> > maria=0A> >=0A> >=0A>= >=0A> >=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-993381238-1264010020=:28687-- From general-return-951-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 20:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70286 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 20:07:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 20:07:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 66576 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 20:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66524 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 20:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66513 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 20:07:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:07:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.25] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:07:35 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so1027432eye.23 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:07:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=68nCk0QJnIcVQt/J0VixyUDx/kksPfGk777+SI8pUhI=; b=Q20RZWQAf9jiMBqwj/Ny6dAp0PBb86TAlR0Wk+yEjcKhMVE9iCKMbsLwGj0UaPD4HM zl9LdYjVoM9m6Lw3H4NPL4rQM7NuUARu6MFTs8NRdiujLUw/zxMVh/UEjyMENYPm3RMg QRyo0CSBU0iyQwm2Gu1fE8u6libPPlaPKiNoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=INqql4n5+bO+EKb4zkHZXmRtQj+DvSdN0F5ef6pv4WVyyrMDOSzkaZ0QX1PTdccKXg iHjSIWO+ls7S/VgUVBUd0EbFtw21d3kSsvOzlvZOV3+pYtnviNcfrQj/fiQ+lMDv/A7u VTWUDfqmK/5Y+FHTw/hFZI727c0UNNVhUb4lE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.203 with SMTP id w53mr165157wee.58.1264018035364; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:07:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:07:15 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7f07afce09a047d9e2114 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7f07afce09a047d9e2114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here's some more info: http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce-patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache Hadoop team regarding future of Hadoop. - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Peter Sankauskas wrote: > I have heard that Google generally get patents to protect themselves rather > than to enforce them. Google don't have any publicly available way to make > money off of map-reduce (even Google App Engine does not map-reduce > capability yet) so I would imagine they would be fine with Hadoop. Fingers > crossed. > > Kind regards, > Peter Sankauskas > > Motally, Inc > Office: +1 (415) 932-6898 > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Travaglini, Joseph < > Joseph.Travaglini@fmr.com> wrote: > > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL > > &p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,650,331.PN.&OS= > > PN/7,650,331&RS=PN/7,650,331< > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL%0A&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,650,331.PN.&OS=%0APN/7,650,331&RS=PN/7,650,331 > > > > > > > > > > The USPTO granted a patent to Google today for MapReduce, after several > > rejections. I'm no patent expert; how does this affect Hadoop? > > > > > --0016e6d7f07afce09a047d9e2114-- From general-return-952-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 22:07:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26105 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 22:07:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 22:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 42453 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:07:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42369 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42359 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 22:07:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:07:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.220] (HELO mail-bw0-f220.google.com) (209.85.218.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:07:09 +0000 Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so4838711bwz.34 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:06:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IqVwpFTJ2+Y8rgivFJgdrc4KWH0nj6rcGkPDTLSYStQ=; b=MaIV+nJiTcqxGXxBkauphZHk6/yh+sAz5QdEt88Z0ZzgkFZryWDfJgPZXzgC0V3pu3 /9tnfygT8re+u+cySh1tzdW6s5K2AYNmpOS8G6rnKA9jGY+/+RCvqJfXXJb1fSo6lBrW iuLXFhyIqR1MILPHe11mW+DpjqfUXk51c4uqA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CXDe/r+gf+tZ53f2CyzV5V0jKEAqiUEE5j6o3E4KaFmB11jQXboO69wo7y7SnWIhXB jEG7WtWdZEQD185FgrO9/yuA4T4vjBQ4yd22vZX/XI3cmsk+v4VgQ3QDed2NGSvnnmI+ akN6HNBBnJs1nYOi57F5ZlIN/+KD+p6dPKiw8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.209 with SMTP id u17mr297940bkd.189.1264025208544; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:06:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:06:48 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce From: Robert Burrell Donkin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something wrote: > Here's some more info: > > http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce-patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars > > It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache Hadoop team > regarding future of Hadoop. > > - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( don't worry every substantial application has a very large probability of patent infringement sooner or later, software patents will have to be abolished - robert From general-return-953-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 22:10:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28929 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 22:10:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 22:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 52906 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52825 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 22:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.220] (HELO mail-bw0-f220.google.com) (209.85.218.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:10:35 +0000 Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so4841917bwz.34 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:10:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3wFE4TtVrDlbnbtGakseYqaFJdcJrZLwN3eV671uuk0=; b=AXDMVUUQ4J8WIunhrJapNKwI6EoOxWj3PsKdPG3n4Poiiu18q9AYRhNLyI1CaaenWU AQHzCqs22DDg9FKIipbOt3qj9WL8fRypDdTy80ihv+H+4zpQ6Doy4ADW1AycBZ5AAQJf /iabM5b1xak2vKG3z22iH7rytV5pRGFot1qk0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oWL19PEjA32XfOUa0nv0N7IdnOZjLDppa3NaykPnayWKx/dKbVcoV7ONbmJ1wCRYsU KzroR1CyKdtyrp1ttAIu5JAf4BHqB3+jdcJsmUhyjzRNDTHauycqqbCf24mo5eYZXNJn NqWOMELy1oZd6ypbqKRaawRyOTKVyy07JfRjU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.24.130 with SMTP id v2mr317718bkb.120.1264025414060; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:10:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:10:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce From: Robert Burrell Donkin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something > wrote: >> Here's some more info: >> >> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce-patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars >> >> It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache Hadoop team >> regarding future of Hadoop. >> >> - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( > > don't worry > > every substantial application has a very large probability of patent > infringement basically, no company that uses software can enforce a software patent against any tech major due to mutually-assured destruction through software patent armageddon. lots of tech majors use hadoop ergo google would be MAD to use the patent. - robert From general-return-954-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 20 22:13:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30458 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 22:13:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 22:13:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 56916 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:13:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56824 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 22:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56778 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 22:13:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:13:08 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:12:48 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:11:53 +0100 Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Topic: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Index: AcqaHW612ILTQXq4T5uL4UKdQqCpPgAACPyB Message-ID: References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tend to second that - nothing to worry about: http://gigaom.com/2010/01/1= 9/why-hadoop-users-shouldnt-fear-googles-new-mapreduce-patent/. Evert Lammerts ________________________________________ From: Robert Burrell Donkin [robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something > wrote: >> Here's some more info: >> >> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce-patent= -what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars >> >> It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache Hadoop tea= m >> regarding future of Hadoop. >> >> - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( > > don't worry > > every substantial application has a very large probability of patent > infringement basically, no company that uses software can enforce a software patent against any tech major due to mutually-assured destruction through software patent armageddon. lots of tech majors use hadoop ergo google would be MAD to use the patent. - robert From general-return-955-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 21 04:30:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73016 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 04:30:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2010 04:30:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 93836 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 04:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93543 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 04:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93533 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2010 04:30:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:30:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:30:11 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so3951261pwi.29 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:29:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WGxielrfR26jpzKTnm/YIQnAynOBgNyFSyYva1goM/8=; b=QoEgqHRXj4PcMgQniQI585do4blT+VrL7KL7ARy4W7aCBPdP5bctKOdaImUjdM4NuT qxtvy49ker7dbnQcBebwzLzfkM95Fd00Mq0pfv2h+GYJB8PAL4m2quYoylA8dM+/f50g Z4h9jZfMeiaYRJD7xUSUA2PukppMCu+R/TA8Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=u8qmPHX2KwUCsqVi6a1L2GDmvcWCmyMfw3iOtacES2u4y/he258swuedtqSkYPoPrH EbUMgIPWPx/YgGnbgApZ7i2OS+SxT5UTwqmkXKf94RWJopQRqjMEcaW/iqfFOU1IlYsa 7zcg2jmXg/Be/eJ5fZAh0o/p5Pfa40gbR9zMI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.248.8 with SMTP id v8mr644544rvh.228.1264048190554; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:29:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <586024.28687.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> <586024.28687.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:29:50 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af21001202029r14b7ae8ew7d1ba0ca4a91c613@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd116ba60852c047da5272a --000e0cd116ba60852c047da5272a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What's the error message of telnet? On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:53 AM, ZUBAIR MIAN wrote: > Still giving me the same error > > > > > ________________________________ > From: xiao yang > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 1:51:04 PM > Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) > > Maybe the firewall blocked this port. > Try: > $telnet 192.168.0.1 54310 > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN > wrote: > > > Have already done that. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: xiao yang > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 6:09:57 PM > > Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) > > > > Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts. > > It may work. > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN > > wrote: > > > > > Dear all > > > > > > I am facing problem wrt the datanode(at slave). In the log file of > slave > > i > > > am getting following message: > > > "Call to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local > exception: > > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host at > > > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException" > > > I am currently working on two node cluster. The network is working > fine. > > > Both machines can ping each other. > > > > > > And Following is the log file of datanode. > > > > > > > > > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > > > STARTUP_MSG: host = slave/192.168.0.2 > > > STARTUP_MSG: args = [] > > > STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.1 > > > STARTUP_MSG: build = > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc1-r > > > 810220; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009 > > > ************************************************************/ > > > 2010-01-15 18:50:56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 3 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 4 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 5 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,443 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying > > connect > > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s). > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException: > > Call > > > to master/192.168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception: > > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > > > at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:314) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RPC.java:291) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269) > > > at > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246) > > > at > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368) > > > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host > > > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method) > > > at > > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:592) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404) > > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304) > > > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719) > > > ... 13 more > > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,451 INFO > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > > /************************************************************ > > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at slave/192.168.0.2 > > > ************************************************************/ > > > > > > Please help me asap. > > > > > > regards > > > maria > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --000e0cd116ba60852c047da5272a-- From general-return-956-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 21 10:21:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95290 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 10:21:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2010 10:21:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8550 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 10:21:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8476 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 10:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8466 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2010 10:21:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:21:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.163.179.142] (HELO web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.163.179.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:20:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 2248 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jan 2010 10:20:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264069231; bh=ZdClqcKwTKjAKwf+gdJjwc4G7Lv5SjGAHfgNjTUBWF4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i2gIg2MeCMLBZrUWvkujResn2IJi8Y2H0OnwagVzxGVAsqe3owZ4fu1fMt7ibqgXlErlK9+5c8j09hqhyz5p/AKRbbdtQGrnO89X1lW/cMcAjN2cX11IfL0WCH9nbBUvxWRyLCHwO33gjAkSsXwPF2aGso42ICwLFFzJnUo2/vA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bAr7lJ5L0aqtJBTIQSxDRry6HFdumrBkbTNWsgcaJbTbtrQMC7pVJkQOMSEbqAkvv+6siQRwrv0wLWnfgXWyGpzv5eqnrD4MwqsjWxqYUvvHZkHbymq8ZBML2e7wGdG8Tl0SmCQquXSEGQV3p10jgrSb8vDhUnK934rhUMliibE=; Message-ID: <82033.1447.qm@web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: w9p9EDYVM1nt__mTzQfj_BkNdCCFBOW617AFVjagw.RnnLKIJv8RyCuCVDQtv.KK..NuOr5mYjDKqky_pt5qsFLnoKtHqbu27NgjanTJnuOs5seeG9pjBsNDh_HRz.EKaPkFJlnQc6chKzx.9F2B5kdFlEj0tRgA30UrF1CvLQOg0D1D7I8bZhmTYPTFFKSGLFUw2uzJcUTSDH_UmhvNLIk673ltV42BonEtmJS.z39Mu699goYkUZHg.a4E4t_8cfExhvDlu6MGuo7Dq8hrMHqgLZrMMD020d703YZHXSFG_kZ7NyvEV.XLCF8.n4p1WS2aoZC.tGYf54LPOmR5NT4VIcB4UiSbKorvWd288qdli4hvMnxKT8CJnTG0bgLYeqaaFS4c.jIOWtmC.giU7LVEbPPmVvdCP.eaCWG5HKLWhJrby.vFaSv0WcwOzyAx89PF_ebChDc9Spjro083a3UQX8WjWvZq4TRry6wda.unl4yjoLGSzHLbSfqsih2ThFlJ5B5PpQgV5rYhKCKk8GfN1oic4YzerNIAuV.PCVpU5Ga.ApCHaHSZ.7AVEEQ06wIIqW_dcJ0wtPcpNjHj2bBInpRwKl7283NKy9toZSGyIat9wSVXHU1.IjPgvJhS873D6ARvyWbiggYTt.9rs1E4PDB4l4wT0N19IfyDDFeMbGpAxJpI0RGYEDdnnPEQO6.Hq8CQTKKVuwERhWN2cTvHOQuDGwuEg5.jkQY6lGmNfGjRHoQqxR9j6d6BCnFHvd8o3ZihuKvV8r8pZJ8UpQM5n1RmuebAt8lF9C9uGRFsWttB9DUOo1i.PryADieUMJd6A7pMz.MqHh0L.eVQrcyGIt66uHRjWhxXF.kE1RNlYMWY4ko9hJRrrVb4bAhK3OrLaIngXIWVipqf8zPnClaepBrOEGOEUWe1dH5bx1kQicCBbFRKQfFfgLwyKdm1.4DL6bUigy58Lx_QF h8lBGMrQcNioDXXWYOtSfNClQ1SHsYain8xw_.hSQ4pcIxsXIYGbpBRzAo_e01eT5RBJ9b1MoWn.yVQaR4iG1sHNQcgS_eMOFWzrA-- Received: from [115.186.10.32] by web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:20:30 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> <586024.28687.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001202029r14b7ae8ew7d1ba0ca4a91c613@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:20:30 -0800 (PST) From: ZUBAIR MIAN Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5a921af21001202029r14b7ae8ew7d1ba0ca4a91c613@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-762101944-1264069230=:1447" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-762101944-1264069230=:1447 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable the error msg is "no route to host" if i do "telnet 192.168.0.2 54311" and = "Connection failed" with "telnet 192.168.0.1 54310"=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_________= _______________________=0AFrom: xiao yang =0ATo: ge= neral@hadoop.apache.org=0ASent: Thu, January 21, 2010 9:29:50 AM=0ASubject:= Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine)=0A=0AWhat's the error message of = telnet?=0A=0AOn Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:53 AM, ZUBAIR MIAN wrote:=0A=0A> Still giving me the same error=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> ___= _____________________________=0A> From: xiao yang = =0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 1:51:04 = PM=0A> Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine)=0A>=0A> Maybe the = firewall blocked this port.=0A> Try:=0A> $telnet 192.168.0.1 54310=0A>=0A> = On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN =0A> w= rote:=0A>=0A> > Have already done that.=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > _____= ___________________________=0A> > From: xiao yang = =0A> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> > Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 6:09= :57 PM=0A> > Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine)=0A> >=0A> > = Add hosts and ip address in /etc/hosts.=0A> > It may work.=0A> >=0A> > On T= ue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM, ZUBAIR MIAN =0A> > wrot= e:=0A> >=0A> > > Dear all=0A> > >=0A> > > I am facing problem wrt the datan= ode(at slave). In the log file of=0A> slave=0A> > i=0A> > > am getting foll= owing message:=0A> > >=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "Call to master/192.168.0.1:5= 4310 failed on local=0A> exception:=0A> > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException= :=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 No route to host at=0A> > > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.= Client.wrapException"=0A> > > I am currently working on two node cluster. T= he network is working=0A> fine.=0A> > > Both machines can ping each other.= =0A> > >=0A> > > And Following is the log file of datanode.=0A> > >=0A> > >= =0A> > >=A0 STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode=0A> > > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 host =3D= slave/192.168.0.2=0A> > > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 args =3D []=0A> > > STARTUP_MSG:= =A0 version =3D 0.20.1=0A> > > STARTUP_MSG:=A0 build =3D=0A> > > http://svn= .apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.1-rc1-r=0A> > > 81022= 0; compiled by 'oom' on Tue Sep=A0 1 20:55:56 UTC 2009=0A> > > ************= ************************************************/=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:50:= 56,435 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to= server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 0 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01= -15 18:50:57,436 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect= =0A> > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 1 time(s).=0A> = > > 2010-01-15 18:50:58,437 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A>= > connect=0A> > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 2 tim= e(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:50:59,438 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Re= trying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already t= ried 3 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:00,439 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.= Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310.= Already tried 4 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:01,440 INFO org.apache.h= adoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to server: master/192.168.= 0.1:54310. Already tried 5 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:02,441 INFO or= g.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to server: maste= r/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 6 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:03,4= 43 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> > > to ser= ver: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 7 time(s).=0A> > > 2010-01-15 = 18:51:04,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > connect=0A> = > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 8 time(s).=0A> > > 2= 010-01-15 18:51:05,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying=0A> > co= nnect=0A> > > to server: master/192.168.0.1:54310. Already tried 9 time(s).= =0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,449 ERROR=0A> > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.serve= r.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException:=0A> > Call=0A> > > to master/192.= 168.0.1:54310 failed on local exception:=0A> > > java.net.NoRouteToHostExce= ption: No route to host=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapExce= ption(Client.java:774)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Clie= nt.java:742)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.jav= a:220)=0A> > >=A0 at $Proxy4.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)=0A> > >=A0 = at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apach= e.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:346)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc= .RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:383)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitFor= Proxy(RPC.java:314)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.waitForProxy(RP= C.java:291)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.d= atanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:269)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A>= org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216)= =0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.Dat= aNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> org.= apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.ja= va:1238)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.data= node.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368)=0A= > > > Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host=0A> > >= =A0 at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)=0A> > >=A0 = at=0A> > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:= 592)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTime= out.connect(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:206)=0A> > >=A0 at org.apache.hadoop.n= et.NetUtils.connect(NetUtils.java:404)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> > org.apache.hadoo= p.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:304)=0A> > >=A0 at=0A> o= rg.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:176)=0A> > >= =A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:859)=0A> > >= =A0 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)=0A> > >=A0 ... 13= more=0A> > > 2010-01-15 18:51:05,451 INFO=0A> > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.s= erver.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG:=0A> > > /***************************= *********************************=0A> > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataN= ode at slave/192.168.0.2=0A> > > ******************************************= ******************/=0A> > >=0A> > > Please help me asap.=0A> > >=0A> > > re= gards=0A> > > maria=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >= =0A> >=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-762101944-1264069230=:1447-- From general-return-957-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 21 10:47:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8303 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2010 10:47:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2010 10:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 38533 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 10:47:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38466 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2010 10:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38456 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2010 10:47:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:47:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:47:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0088B7F03 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:47:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7qJy6J5XCb-I for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DF7B7EE8 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:47:08 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1264675617.93711@v62GQe6TCwtk11UymIQ+tA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o0LAkuoK019582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:46:57 GMT Message-ID: <4B5830A0.1020801@apache.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:46:56 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with datanode(slave machine) References: <573443.25346.qm@web35606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001190509hec85921u5d8be7f84b9cbe@mail.gmail.com> <364995.16459.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001200051p509b27f0jce1a11663f795154@mail.gmail.com> <586024.28687.qm@web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5a921af21001202029r14b7ae8ew7d1ba0ca4a91c613@mail.gmail.com> <82033.1447.qm@web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <82033.1447.qm@web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o0LAkuoK019582 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ZUBAIR MIAN wrote: > the error msg is "no route to host" if i do "telnet 192.168.0.2 54311" and "Connection failed" with "telnet 192.168.0.1 54310" > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/NoRouteToHost From general-return-958-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 03:52:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72892 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 03:52:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 03:52:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 80771 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 03:52:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80621 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 03:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80602 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 03:52:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.66 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.66] (HELO szxga03-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:52:48 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM00M4EQRE16@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:52:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM00D92QRET0@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:52:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWM00K7PQRE49@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:52:26 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:22:24 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: RE: debug MapReduce task running on a cluster In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <000b01ca9b16$4f79f960$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcqZr6ZeddEW+lU+QFO7l6MAv9phhAALglzbAE4muyA= Thanks.. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -----Original Message----- From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu [mailto:amarsri@YAHOO-INC.COM] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:05 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; naveenkumarp@huawei.com Subject: Re: debug MapReduce task running on a cluster See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToDebugMapReducePrograms http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#IsolationR unner and http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/mapred_tutorial.html#Debugging Thanks Amareshwari On 1/20/10 2:35 PM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" wrote: Hi All, I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. I was trying to find ways to debug a MapReduce task running on a cluster. However, I was not able to get something concrete and precise. It would be great if anyone can help me on the same. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! From general-return-959-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 03:54:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73350 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 03:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 03:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 82582 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 03:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82433 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 03:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82423 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 03:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.67] (HELO szxga04-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:54:34 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM00HD7QU9DW@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:54:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM001WSQU948@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:54:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWM002RKQU893@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:54:09 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:24:07 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: encoding types supported by Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <000c01ca9b16$8cb5f040$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_dhFYSgxhEFHkMcPN0BLErQ)" Thread-index: AcqbFowrx2zkXZwmTZWgQo2llOJyOA== --Boundary_(ID_dhFYSgxhEFHkMcPN0BLErQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi All, I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. Can anyone tell me how to write a simple MapReduce implementation to just read some files from the directory and write to directory. Also I wanted to know which all encoding types are supported by Hadoop and how to configure and use various encoding types. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! --Boundary_(ID_dhFYSgxhEFHkMcPN0BLErQ)-- From general-return-960-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 04:46:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84204 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 04:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 15186 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 04:46:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 04:46:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15005 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 04:46:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:46:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:46:36 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so526605pxi.2 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:46:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.6 with SMTP id d6mr1626821wfa.303.1264135576189; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:46:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <000c01ca9b16$8cb5f040$2401120a@china.huawei.com> References: <000c01ca9b16$8cb5f040$2401120a@china.huawei.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:45:56 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001212045k49edcd4fhd2ebee0fac798a9b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: encoding types supported by Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org, naveenkumarp@huawei.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e2729f77aed047db97f46 --0016368e2729f77aed047db97f46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Naveen, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Naveen Kumar Prasad < naveenkumarp@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. > > Can anyone tell me how to write a simple MapReduce implementation to just > read some files from the directory > and write to directory. > It sounds like what you want is the distcp job. Just run "hadoop distcp" and it will print some usage information for you. > > Also I wanted to know which all encoding types are supported by Hadoop and > how to configure and use various encoding types. > > I'm not sure what you mean here by encoding. Could you elaborate on this question, please? Thanks -Todd --0016368e2729f77aed047db97f46-- From general-return-961-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 05:02:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87274 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 05:02:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 05:02:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23600 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 05:02:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23481 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 05:02:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23470 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 05:02:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:02:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.64 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.64] (HELO szxga01-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:01:53 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM004TPTYJMB@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:01:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWM00I37TYJGB@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:01:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWM00L7DTYHOI@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:01:31 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:31:27 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: RE: encoding types supported by Hadoop In-reply-to: <45f85f71001212045k49edcd4fhd2ebee0fac798a9b@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: todd@cloudera.com Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <002201ca9b1f$f5b82d20$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcqbHeffaDmIaxFdSuaRfWNb5zhZaAAAS7og X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Todd, To elaborate more on the encoding query : Actually the input file we use while working with Hadoop, may have different encoding types, Like : encoding="UTF-8" (UTF-16, GBK, etc) So I want to know which all encoding types are supported by Hadoop. User Scenario : I want to read from a input text file (suppose file01.txt) which has chinese characters And write it to a output text file (suppose fileo2.txt) and verify whether the chinese characters are coming properly in the output file (and not as junk characters). { It would be appreciable if u cud tell me how to verify this. ) Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -----Original Message----- From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:16 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; naveenkumarp@huawei.com Subject: Re: encoding types supported by Hadoop Hi Naveen, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Naveen Kumar Prasad < naveenkumarp@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. > > Can anyone tell me how to write a simple MapReduce implementation to > just read some files from the directory and write to > directory. > It sounds like what you want is the distcp job. Just run "hadoop distcp" and it will print some usage information for you. > > Also I wanted to know which all encoding types are supported by Hadoop > and how to configure and use various encoding types. > > I'm not sure what you mean here by encoding. Could you elaborate on this question, please? Thanks -Todd From general-return-962-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 05:37:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 279 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 05:37:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 05:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 56493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 05:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56394 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 05:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56384 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 05:37:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:37:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.wang.1900@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.27] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:37:05 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so192854eye.23 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:36:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g9E/Ki5afAAI9gE39FMAZ1O4BwGnOxToIsnpSjHeWpY=; b=BL0qAzeMXoyJcux8qnAusLENxeI/3LBohe1JNZHphnge1+yNldjzjjzLGTSE7pbMoj l9x/3hOvPyCLifZggoNiwyrg8DstVi0IcqrDUv2XcBhmrj1vLLPtEuv6Pm4zBHN109lT APnVzDiV0UuJy8kKBQiaJRFIt/g9ohhg0RaRU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uuyyv4yOjZD994d2VnLiTFR3fDOVhTNys3xUhu7rQ4Ph5VME+0adpO22twPjFzMKZt dvxiIO/VLJqCJIn/PjUtyXJc8qz9BfmGxPRykVZZAGkeUAkdT2z580OdVwZdZ0lmub4Z ktiqibW6iNdzZ0+bLf475NS2ZnjN5Ve9zJ3M4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.65 with SMTP id v43mr950437wee.118.1264138603802; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:36:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <000c01ca9b16$8cb5f040$2401120a@china.huawei.com> References: <000c01ca9b16$8cb5f040$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:36:43 +0800 Message-ID: <995905631001212136r4e723601i7e80234adcc3196c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: encoding types supported by Hadoop From: Andrew Wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org, naveenkumarp@huawei.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d784ee6d31ac047dba3467 --0016e6d784ee6d31ac047dba3467 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi,Naveen The default encoding type supported by Hadoop is UTF-8, so, if you'd like to use other types, you have to custom the FileInputFormat and FileOutPutFormat. For me, i like to convert the input content to some special encoding type, etc: String line = new String(value.getBytes(), 0, value.getLength(),"GBK"); At same time, i implement one custom FileOutputFormat, namely,GbkOutputFormat, to support output with GBK type. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Naveen Kumar Prasad < naveenkumarp@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new to hadoop/Mapreduce usage. > > Can anyone tell me how to write a simple MapReduce implementation to just > read some files from the directory > and write to directory. > > Also I wanted to know which all encoding types are supported by Hadoop and > how to configure and use various encoding types. > > Regards, > Naveen Kumar > HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo > > @21052009-015A> > > > Address: Huawei Industrial Base > Bantian Longgang > Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China > www.huawei.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------- > This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from > HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is > listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way > (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, > or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender > by > phone or email immediately and delete it! > > -- http://anqiang1900.blog.163.com/ --0016e6d784ee6d31ac047dba3467-- From general-return-963-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 07:49:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45543 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 07:49:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 07:49:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 37367 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 07:49:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37285 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 07:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37271 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 07:49:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:49:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.195] (HELO mail-iw0-f195.google.com) (209.85.223.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:48:55 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so789979iwn.29 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:48:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mrl7arPJEbtvUjjG9PP0vweZbT+NwSWPS4sySN5Ji/Y=; b=fNV5Zx6nq+JzIfzR1OmFLXcbWrJpd/oz424NxfLbrPjPUYjn2eA16wRW5AgmArnWQs fWzIDnHKFbXuCVaaHMSi6T+/J2nmN/5YR8bO/zQ4jQirBgmRPVxRuLcnz0stfu5K0XXM yCSDmdj3QXc4kOcY6LqWjaHHv8TR7B/h/EC8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=hSnX8NTbrxuY2nm4JaxKC3dv0uZXFPFfcjnR/l+ipn+ofRercFr5JzvJpJmM6LfxzQ qsqwnfYW56mcwtAGTAnOHuXIsJULdDGtBsrsVGEjq9vJXGVqoj8hx5ZYPvmHn69b5Ciw 4mmV8Buz74CNR4GpHkL8l6BVRtDZYd73JqMD0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.145.1 with SMTP id b1mr1734358ibv.62.1264146515096; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:48:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:48:35 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0, Status : FAILED java.io.FileNotFoundException: From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485eba798f9f53f047dbc0be4 --001485eba798f9f53f047dbc0be4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi I will appreciate if someone can help resolve the following error. i am going nuts over this. $ bin/hadoop jar sparqlcloud.jar org.bike.MainClass 10/01/22 16:38:27 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 10/01/22 16:38:27 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/01/22 16:38:28 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201001221636_0001 10/01/22 16:38:29 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 10/01/22 16:38:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0, Status : FAILED *java.io.FileNotFoundException: File C:/tmp/hadoop-SYSTEM/mapred/local/taskTracker/jobcache/job_201001221636_0001/attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0/work/tmp does not exist.* at org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.java:420) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:244) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.setupWorkDir(TaskRunner.java:520) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:143) =============== working under CYGWIN and using hadoop-0.19.2 I have tried the following solutions, 1. bin/hadoop fsck / - output - The file system under / is healthy 2. formatted the hdfs bin/hadoop namenode -format - but error does not go. 3. change the value tmp.dir property in conf/hadoop-default.xml to some other directory but still the error doesnot go. I will appreciate if some one can help resolve the error. Thanks H. Kumar --001485eba798f9f53f047dbc0be4-- From general-return-964-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 08:49:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60512 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 08:49:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 08:49:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 6150 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 08:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6082 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 08:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6072 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 08:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.195] (HELO mail-iw0-f195.google.com) (209.85.223.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:49:20 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so820147iwn.29 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XD+Ux/jpmydDgFy4dxyOT8yY4Vk9Z/Go8lJWRnb8l9I=; b=D8vXsAc9cU7gyKLMslfiiz6w5vQvQZLCO77KEgPxCZtTPS0f8nxsGvcnR14vPD3zJy BO39sR5Z8FWM4JHzywZG1i5AcT5u2NSFqbsPOOxJO030KzYuZ2G6HbOqMdTTcEftRvJa t4NciMGYmw6Q2yQOjwDS9XnnBPpJrzXyPCXCQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bjo7wcyMZV2zJI1zIp+mZEXE1pRA/cGfdI+/hc9e6E2fFB6nSFj743EexV5zblr1Pt 7f/c2t+WD9SbtJektwQVHktauZ3HCxL/tMBFOqf7j51vkyzlVpa5gUnNdLAyQ2HAl8nP JwItR1nTnjj0E6M8s6GGMu/6QRLa98ujR5tuw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.148.13 with SMTP id n13mr4114068ibv.67.1264150139074; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:48:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:48:59 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0, Status : FAILED java.io.FileNotFoundException: From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64079aefb7b91047dbce3fa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64079aefb7b91047dbce3fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have just updated to cygwin 1.7 and if I try to format the namenode, i get the following warning by cygwin. $ bin/hadoop namenode -format cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\cygwin\home\bike\HADOOP~1.2\/build/native Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /home/bike/HADOOP~1.2/build/native CYGWIN environment variable option "nodosfilewarning" turns off this warning. Consult the user's guide for more details about POSIX paths: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames 10/01/22 17:40:59 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = bike-3da7ab8ed1/147.46.166.184 STARTUP_MSG: args = [-format] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.19.2 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.19 -r 789657; compiled by 'root' on Tue Jun 30 12:40:50 EDT 2009 ************************************************************/ Re-format filesystem in \tmp\hadoop-bike\dfs\name ? (Y or N) --------------------------- Just wondering, is it possible that the error is because namenode format it according to windows namespace so hadoop cannot find /work/temp folder? would like to hear some feedback from the community thanks H. Kumar 2010/1/22 Harshit Kumar > Hi > > I will appreciate if someone can help resolve the following error. i am > going nuts over this. > > $ bin/hadoop jar sparqlcloud.jar org.bike.MainClass > 10/01/22 16:38:27 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > 10/01/22 16:38:27 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process > : 1 > 10/01/22 16:38:28 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201001221636_0001 > 10/01/22 16:38:29 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > 10/01/22 16:38:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0, Status : FAILED > *java.io.FileNotFoundException: File > C:/tmp/hadoop-SYSTEM/mapred/local/taskTracker/jobcache/job_201001221636_0001/attempt_201001221636_0001_m_000003_0/work/tmp > does not exist.* > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.java:420) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:244) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.setupWorkDir(TaskRunner.java:520) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:143) > > > =============== > working under CYGWIN and using hadoop-0.19.2 > > I have tried the following solutions, > 1. bin/hadoop fsck / - output - The file system under / is healthy > 2. formatted the hdfs bin/hadoop namenode -format - but error does not go. > 3. change the value tmp.dir property in conf/hadoop-default.xml to some > other directory but still the error doesnot go. > > I will appreciate if some one can help resolve the error. > > > Thanks > H. Kumar > > --0016e64079aefb7b91047dbce3fa-- From general-return-965-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 19:30:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54467 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 19:30:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 19:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 72347 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 19:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72255 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 19:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72245 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 19:30:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:30:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.70 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.70] (HELO amrmr1001.accenture.com) (170.252.248.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:30:11 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1003.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.63]) by amrmr1001.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0MJTExu012360 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:29:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3002.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.24]) by AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:28:02 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.16]) by AMRXH3002.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.24]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:28:02 -0500 From: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 To: Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:27:51 -0500 Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Topic: Google Patent on MapReduce thread-index: AcqaHW612ILTQXq4T5uL4UKdQqCpPgAACPyBAF6zPgA= Message-ID: References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: 09adAobbHVBoiwi/p+E32w== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2010 19:28:02.0436 (UTC) FILETIME=[037DD440:01CA9B99] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The patent covers only the implementation, but not the programming = model. If Google enforces, Hadoop could change its implementation to get = around. The independent claims 1 and 9 have too many "wherein" clauses = that, if Hadoop just changes one aspect, it can get around the claim = language.=20 http://huanliu.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/googles-mapreduce-patent-and-its-= impact-on-hadoop-and-cloud-mapreduce/ -Huan > -----Original Message----- > From: Evert Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:12 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > I tend to second that - nothing to worry about: > http://gigaom.com/2010/01/19/why-hadoop-users-shouldnt-fear-googles- > new-mapreduce-patent/. >=20 > Evert Lammerts > ________________________________________ > From: Robert Burrell Donkin [robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something > > wrote: > >> Here's some more info: > >> > >> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce- > patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars > >> > >> It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache = Hadoop > team > >> regarding future of Hadoop. > >> > >> - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( > > > > don't worry > > > > every substantial application has a very large probability of patent > > infringement >=20 > basically, no company that uses software can enforce a software patent > against any tech major due to mutually-assured destruction through > software patent armageddon. lots of tech majors use hadoop ergo google > would be MAD to use the patent. >=20 > - robert This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-966-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 19:32:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54909 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 19:32:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 74508 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 19:32:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74446 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 19:32:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74436 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 19:32:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:32:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.59.59.114] (HELO trironport1.altair.com) (67.59.59.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:31:51 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,325,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="10005944" Received: from unknown (HELO TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com) ([204.235.24.175]) by trironport1.altair.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2010 14:31:30 -0500 Received: from TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) by TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:32:13 -0500 From: Lori Ann Martin To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:31:27 -0500 Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Topic: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Index: AcqaHW612ILTQXq4T5uL4UKdQqCpPgAACPyBAF6zPgAAAEYNEA== Message-ID: <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112D153D857@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Are you in Los Angeles? -----Original Message----- From: huan.liu@accenture.com [mailto:huan.liu@accenture.com]=20 Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:28 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce The patent covers only the implementation, but not the programming model. I= f Google enforces, Hadoop could change its implementation to get around. Th= e independent claims 1 and 9 have too many "wherein" clauses that, if Hadoo= p just changes one aspect, it can get around the claim language.=20 http://huanliu.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/googles-mapreduce-patent-and-its-im= pact-on-hadoop-and-cloud-mapreduce/ -Huan > -----Original Message----- > From: Evert Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:12 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > I tend to second that - nothing to worry about: > http://gigaom.com/2010/01/19/why-hadoop-users-shouldnt-fear-googles- > new-mapreduce-patent/. >=20 > Evert Lammerts > ________________________________________ > From: Robert Burrell Donkin [robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something > > wrote: > >> Here's some more info: > >> > >> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce- > patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars > >> > >> It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache Hadoop > team > >> regarding future of Hadoop. > >> > >> - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( > > > > don't worry > > > > every substantial application has a very large probability of patent > > infringement >=20 > basically, no company that uses software can enforce a software patent > against any tech major due to mutually-assured destruction through > software patent armageddon. lots of tech majors use hadoop ergo google > would be MAD to use the patent. >=20 > - robert This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privilege= d, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it = in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. An= y other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-967-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 22 21:26:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86751 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 21:26:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 21:26:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 1887 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 21:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1817 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 21:26:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1807 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 21:26:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:26:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.70] (HELO mailout01.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:26:30 +0000 Received: from mailint01 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout01 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41674432A for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:26:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint01 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32765428D for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:26:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.25]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:26:08 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA9BA9.834D7604" Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:25:53 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03469FDA@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F03469FDA@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Thread-Topic: Google Patent on MapReduce Thread-Index: AcqaHW612ILTQXq4T5uL4UKdQqCpPgAACPyBAF6zPgAAAEYNEAAEAKf3 References: <2c44f6691001191243t418989cav28e1d072e59e6e21@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001201207s7e2c67d7w99f9598c8868f4df@mail.gmail.com> , <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112D153D857@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2010 21:26:08.0638 (UTC) FILETIME=[833271E0:01CA9BA9] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9BA9.834D7604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software patents are not recognised nor enforcable in European Union = member states (UK, France, Germany, Belgium etc.). The Apache license = v.2.0 states: "This License shall be governed by the law of the jurisdiction specified = in a notice contained within the Original Software..." Do you know which jurisdiction you chose for the Hadoop MapReduce = implementation - seems to me to be relevant? I don't find a reference to = a jurisdiction in release 0.20.1? -----Original Message----- From: Lori Ann Martin [mailto:lmartin@altair.com] Sent: Fri 1/22/2010 8:31 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce =20 Are you in Los Angeles? -----Original Message----- From: huan.liu@accenture.com [mailto:huan.liu@accenture.com]=20 Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:28 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce The patent covers only the implementation, but not the programming = model. If Google enforces, Hadoop could change its implementation to get = around. The independent claims 1 and 9 have too many "wherein" clauses = that, if Hadoop just changes one aspect, it can get around the claim = language.=20 http://huanliu.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/googles-mapreduce-patent-and-its-= impact-on-hadoop-and-cloud-mapreduce/ -Huan > -----Original Message----- > From: Evert Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:12 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: RE: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > I tend to second that - nothing to worry about: > http://gigaom.com/2010/01/19/why-hadoop-users-shouldnt-fear-googles- > new-mapreduce-patent/. >=20 > Evert Lammerts > ________________________________________ > From: Robert Burrell Donkin [robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:10 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Google Patent on MapReduce >=20 > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Something Something > > wrote: > >> Here's some more info: > >> > >> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/googles-mapreduce- > patent-what-does-it-mean-for-hadoop.ars > >> > >> It will be nice to get some official announcement from Apache = Hadoop > team > >> regarding future of Hadoop. > >> > >> - A very scared Hadoop Fan :( > > > > don't worry > > > > every substantial application has a very large probability of patent > > infringement >=20 > basically, no company that uses software can enforce a software patent > against any tech major due to mutually-assured destruction through > software patent armageddon. lots of tech majors use hadoop ergo google > would be MAD to use the patent. >=20 > - robert This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA9BA9.834D7604-- From general-return-968-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 24 22:35:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52042 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2010 22:35:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 22:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12618 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2010 22:35:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12552 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2010 22:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12542 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2010 22:35:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.187] (HELO mail-yw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.211.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:35:24 +0000 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so2584483ywh.2 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:35:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qoYXyDRk+Z5B2deuUhMimwAhXWzzNmWMi69aBXa2IFA=; b=hgCD0Vy0PFeCRpJSwqlKxTCQC+sQRcvIg+47IS+cDumYi5OynZsIclfCD0iR3d9JRp dFC5Z8WWWHKCHOSdMLxsBWE+32Ar03gU4nfWfVyLCvKZlXGH/J0Jr64JS3tbbZ3Kvdw/ 7rgS210nd2k9oQvbCRFDY4DHNRbTgTwjwBZfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=U9OfPNjdcJy2QIr21FEEgKBHanUaGI32J6x/gkxdwYOhLav6SIDiZzoaTSRCR/IHgd MovE2qWR/qCpqFNFq80l/ejn8mz5xY4gIosVqkVCt3ermFluB8qNp8f5EHS1/S7VEBcL jpaVSsKuJ6jnAZsZOxx8OUPRhEYyq8Km8PDoY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.130.36 with SMTP id c36mr7513615ybd.34.1264372499547; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:34:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <17e273101001191138w4e358d1cja26bc20793d30e26@mail.gmail.com> References: <17e273101001191138w4e358d1cja26bc20793d30e26@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:34:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: splittable encrypted compressed files From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A encryption/decryption mechanism requires the secret key to be securely distributed. As far as moving data on the wire is concerned, SSH is already being used. I am wondering about the performance hit when encryption and then again decryption is applied to the data and what value that might add. --- Gautam On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Hi, > I experimented with hadoop-lzo and liked it. > > Our requirement is changing and we may need to encrypt data files. Does > anyone know of splittable encrypted compression scheme that map task can use > ? > > Thanks > From general-return-969-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 24 22:49:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53677 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2010 22:49:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2010 22:49:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 16727 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2010 22:49:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16643 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2010 22:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16633 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2010 22:49:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:49:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.175] (HELO mail-pz0-f175.google.com) (209.85.222.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:49:28 +0000 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so393700pzk.30 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ez2mQ3mu+ULUMFKCivmKiCJb1qTVLpvyQiwz0r4wWCk=; b=sxP/IHABgFAYTl8erk668z2f24UbWQE1SUCy5jdlYhDlyegn9EUlqs0/54TwM/ACzd qQfOHO9wtxxZVFbeUaLzYvyx3xze8ZapmFKa65KVpZmVsKxVAiq1ePAcJw6WgvPvZVaY h2g3jybGvRDxoCAtWZCYIuqHX8+qvSZhFWU4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=j8YXS8vyYDDnkiSYSs6PEaxsg4fSPL4wwuY+FxaUtHDKjKn22aVSB7lK1UTNh9KvYJ sunMslFktrHoZes9f69E/L+MxIPzi1Z7eNFrKfvQKF4wICBX3NNE/o6RJFvdwezinJgc RHD21VDlFNhuMnH6Izcs3+HWElsSSJv+A5Ysk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.9.10 with SMTP id 10mr4008086wfi.177.1264373347652; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:49:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <17e273101001191138w4e358d1cja26bc20793d30e26@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:49:07 -0800 Message-ID: <17e273101001241449u37fe9607ya1576324a2cb5f09@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: splittable encrypted compressed files From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b49840158c047df0dca5 --00504502b49840158c047df0dca5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A bit more background: the encryption is required by third party. Data coming from third party may come in encrypted .gz format. Cheers On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Gautam Singaraju < gautam.singaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > A encryption/decryption mechanism requires the secret key to be > securely distributed. As far as moving data on the wire is concerned, > SSH is already being used. I am wondering about the performance hit > when encryption and then again decryption is applied to the data and > what value that might add. > > --- > Gautam > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > I experimented with hadoop-lzo and liked it. > > > > Our requirement is changing and we may need to encrypt data files. Does > > anyone know of splittable encrypted compression scheme that map task can > use > > ? > > > > Thanks > > > --00504502b49840158c047df0dca5-- From general-return-970-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 06:34:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85346 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 06:34:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 06:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 51066 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 06:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50915 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 06:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50902 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 06:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.64 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.64] (HELO szxga01-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:33:59 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWS00BTHI816C@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:33:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWS00MBWI81MN@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:33:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWS00LX4I7W0B@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:33:37 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:03:32 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <001801ca9d88$5371f210$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_iuwFz3VudlX6PZbkHOlUsg)" Thread-index: AcqdiFBj+hDr2AfOQVCJLWla69wqZg== --Boundary_(ID_iuwFz3VudlX6PZbkHOlUsg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi All, If many jobs are running concurrently in Hadoop, how can we set CPU usage for individual tasks. The purpose here is to avoid one job affecting the main job's execution. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! --Boundary_(ID_iuwFz3VudlX6PZbkHOlUsg)-- From general-return-971-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 07:14:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98895 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 07:14:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 07:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 77565 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 07:14:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77465 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 07:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77455 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 07:14:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:14:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:14:28 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=r7y+XZcE5OsZr21Fb7fLLCLCYe4cbO75SGCE4eZb3BfsTd8BheMHMioN ST+uyqK9mfpAhVjcF4V91YbhDGEVaaxie7ByfYI6HeiRkHhA2A2tu6K3T oq19wfhGM/nYJRX; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1264403668; x=1295939668; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20set=20how=20much=20CPU=20to=20be=20util ised=20by=20a=20MapReduce=20job|Date:=20Sun,=2024=20Jan =202010=2023:14:06=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit |In-Reply-To:=20<001801ca9d88$5371f210$2401120a@china.hua wei.com>; bh=OFBXWesa4kSR1ypLFGx/ZDsNDHteOlivIiVKiadBDFY=; b=ZPaEPXKx2ZVihfNZN82Vd5R89a2QFjbahjL3nR0pq5s1/pvJrWplXlZa CKxD3w9whYjnzu4mkrkl5JHUG7PaggI88FFxpv4mu4MrCgCuoRE0mBxMh j0ycoSsgdRK1LV2; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,337,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="10523408" Received: from 172.18.36.37 ([172.18.36.37]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:14:07 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:14:06 -0800 Subject: Re: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job Thread-Index: AcqdiFBj+hDr2AfOQVCJLWla69wqZgABaqU/ In-Reply-To: <001801ca9d88$5371f210$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 1/24/10 10:33 PM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" wrote: > If many jobs are running concurrently in Hadoop, how can we set CPU usage > for individual tasks. That functionality does not exist. From general-return-972-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 08:23:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10088 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 08:23:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 08:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18761 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 08:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18684 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 08:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18674 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 08:23:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:23:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of naveenkumarp@huawei.com designates 119.145.14.66 as permitted sender) Received: from [119.145.14.66] (HELO szxga03-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:23:47 +0000 Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWS009EDNAZ08@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:23:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWS00HT3NAZSU@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:23:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from BLRNSHTIPL6NC ([10.18.1.36]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWS003EDNAYJ5@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:23:23 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:53:21 +0530 From: Naveen Kumar Prasad Subject: RE: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Reply-to: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Message-id: <002001ca9d97$a8ba13b0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> Organization: Htipl MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcqdiFBj+hDr2AfOQVCJLWla69wqZgABaqU/AAJPoCA= This functionality may not be readily available with Hadoop. But it would be appreciable if anyone can help me in understanding how to go about developing this feature. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto:awittenauer@linkedin.com] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 12:44 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job On 1/24/10 10:33 PM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" wrote: > If many jobs are running concurrently in Hadoop, how can we set CPU > usage for individual tasks. That functionality does not exist. From general-return-973-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 09:13:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21742 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 09:13:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 09:13:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 61710 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 09:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61630 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 09:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61620 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 09:13:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:13:41 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2609314pzk.2 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:13:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LFbbyInGPQ212PZx5TUEEK1WARpG6SQH5rpzWIuaLl8=; b=kDcy8BKwjNx4FlGQD0G6KG1iRI9vY5nTDkZlLCpm9gkzNr38ebjh1p9MXPxOgc4ikG dJFlu4mGoGRw1eFR4PaDtKpJQT3oNdyyUFiTiTeQF8xZERtQBVwSTp+Zwk8oBGU8eGZH aJ79PMO80BwWBfe6698yWJBNZX+CrUxmjZRM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pK65GKvP9MFfj7GIl8o04X0+m/vfIC96bOCG1nMA8mL2HkNgVTC1VxJn4HHgnPJ8ou 6Ciu75GEA07Rzv6iSvdtofu0Nmb4UfuX4rk/cb2l3CJ+OLpvld6Pv6exxbXIdkhu7zDR sQDCQTVueQDUPOJ1jOrDblHMHoIhRQf3eNjTw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.65.6 with SMTP id s6mr4362884wak.53.1264410799473; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:13:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <78568af11001250112v3b610478w49703d72306d4a2f@mail.gmail.com> References: <002001ca9d97$a8ba13b0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> <78568af11001250112v3b610478w49703d72306d4a2f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:13:19 -0800 Message-ID: <78568af11001250113k41f303ffq8d0eb4ea5bc33523@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: RE: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org, naveenkumarp@huawei.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ce5848d8791047df994a7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64ce5848d8791047df994a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The only thing you could do is to have the tasktracker nice the child when its exceeding its reservation. Aside from that, its hard to limit without killing a process. On Jan 25, 2010 12:23 AM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" wrote: This functionality may not be readily available with Hadoop. But it would be appreciable if anyone can help me in understanding how to go about developing this feature. Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China www.huawei.com ---------... -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto: awittenauer@linkedin.com] Sent: Monday, J... --0016e64ce5848d8791047df994a7-- From general-return-974-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 16:39:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78470 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 16:39:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 16:39:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 66726 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 16:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66654 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 16:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66636 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 16:39:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:26 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so2551501pwi.29 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:39:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.4.41 with SMTP id 41mr580085wfd.123.1264437544942; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:39:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <78568af11001250113k41f303ffq8d0eb4ea5bc33523@mail.gmail.com> References: <002001ca9d97$a8ba13b0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> <78568af11001250112v3b610478w49703d72306d4a2f@mail.gmail.com> <78568af11001250113k41f303ffq8d0eb4ea5bc33523@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:38:43 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71001250838s35572132jc84b220379549092@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: RE: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b443b4ff64047dffce97 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502b443b4ff64047dffce97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If you can require a recent kernel, you could use cgroups: http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/06/manage-your-performance-with-cgroups-and-projects.html No one has integrated this with hadoop yet as it's still pretty new, and Hadoop clusters are meant to be run on unshared hardware. -Todd On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > The only thing you could do is to have the tasktracker nice the child when > its exceeding its reservation. Aside from that, its hard to limit without > killing a process. > > On Jan 25, 2010 12:23 AM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" > wrote: > > > This functionality may not be readily available with Hadoop. > > But it would be appreciable if anyone can help me in understanding how to > go > about developing this feature. > > Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo > > Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China > www.huawei.com ---------... > > -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto: > awittenauer@linkedin.com] Sent: Monday, J... > --00504502b443b4ff64047dffce97-- From general-return-975-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 19:57:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69433 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 19:57:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 19:57:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 4410 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 19:56:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4281 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 19:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4247 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:56:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=PLING_QUERY,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:56:46 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so2704682pwi.29 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:56:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.248.39 with SMTP id v39mr4833221wah.39.1264449386130; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:56:26 -0800 (PST) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:56:06 -0800 Message-ID: <69035571001251156m17c0fcd5k9c0b4ba86fbcae2a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Interested in Hadoop Training outside the US? Let us know! To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 NOTE: Please forward this message to local use groups, especially those that might be less active on the core Apache mailing lists. Feel free to translate into local languages. Hadoop Fans, Over the next year, you'll see new options for Hadoop training and certification from Cloudera. One of the first things you'll see will be live sessions outside the US, tentatively planned for the April / May time frame. We've seen strong interest in Hadoop on all of our international trips, so we'd like to ask for community input as we decide exactly which cities to visit next. For cities we come to, we'll offer our 3 day developer training + certification, and with sufficient interest, we may also include a 1 day training + certification program for system administrators. If you are interested in attending one or both of these sessions, please fill out a brief survey (link below). If you're using Hadoop at work, and it's time to train more of your team, you can let us know how large of a group you have. Survey responses aren't a commitment to attend, but we may reach out to respondents before we schedule a session to get a better understanding of actual attendance. You can fill out survey here: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MKGZHG9 If you have any trouble with the survey, or are interested in a private training session, please don't hesitate to reach out directly. Cheers, Christophe -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera From general-return-976-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 25 23:23:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70171 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 63300 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 23:23:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63199 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2010 23:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63098 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2010 23:22:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:22:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.216] (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:22:52 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so4812668ewy.29 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=UILOZnKiYISJoYySYqAB7jgRcwmwi2ZjcveCvFOV2LI=; b=vUdPlVG56gNwwDE4yZ2BEOwYCyzdi/9RU0j6Hr0P5ZmUEOU1Zv9Le18ey1Wk03NzLI iY69jT2CUd2cvebCre2WRzxRVV7xWF/v6w2vhZrFgXhy42GyxMxIygKnuOa27Qyc7gVC VWKJK0WyVLfxt3zm7+DRhVGtLr7PbdLgw+bAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IVhClKHqw6trpySxwluFPZmsWL2+oKlRJdgWOYDRJNonBP/9A+6OCwUU+9e18bxwJt fthkfuT57jnSVJSue+kn+pw3ETev6WdG4+eIRxH+RsKCQXlal1W+QZEZlzCFKFcLqq/5 FTYKhlwWxRwdwelJ/r2gXvCJa7wiicGSqGSkk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.194 with SMTP id c44mr1429533wef.199.1264461750831; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22:30 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: setNumReduceTasks(1) From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a3ac7d8cbd047e05713d --0016e6d9a3ac7d8cbd047e05713d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the class be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster of say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed to be instantiated only on 1 machine? If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do this? Please let me know. Thanks. --0016e6d9a3ac7d8cbd047e05713d-- From general-return-977-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 00:10:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82886 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 00:10:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 00:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 9052 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 00:10:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8972 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 00:10:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8953 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 00:10:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:10:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:10:15 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so2863656pwi.29 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:09:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0BK6F5oAvmezgjLtf2pjYfqCAvvLw5/iRv153tW4xyQ=; b=OcjgDWSms3X/5Nkwn16an571OOXRblWL4/azb97oL+XgDygIb8iH3qeOhNOP/gAJO+ c6cgIN03kEM6AeiRmREh7A0LrS6/6S6vCwEzRrl5lKIddVYmxMz9FWqQTEUcjlc7cEFG gh1dO6uriy98oF51xsQVCIEwObpPTrK8HLdts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mVSYGzgyS7CBo2beMi01g1MH21jx+j5wMZUlvhJ4ID7CDxDW0YRSIQfTV4IEf9wOXg 2mguDl3x54A/xXMX6BNGwxc/ajAbhSKroAtYwZ+vy/9c9BWECYA1K3YetDVDZ64QTEqj s3D9vQavQLsnVfxQwyHZX+CR7MsHh2QRtp+5o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.1.22 with SMTP id 22mr4954652wfa.331.1264464594964; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:09:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:09:54 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1321001251609r19e737e2s2fdd27f379aeea53@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: setNumReduceTasks(1) From: Jeff Zhang To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b672039198047e061b16 --00504502b672039198047e061b16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 *See my comments below* On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the class > be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster > of > say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed to > be instantiated only on 1 machine? > > *--Yes* > If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how > may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want > to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do > this? Please let me know. Thanks. > *--Maybe you can use Counter to track the number of rows you add to HBase, then you do not need to limit the reduce task as 1* -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang --00504502b672039198047e061b16-- From general-return-978-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 05:03:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66432 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 05:03:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 05:03:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 84724 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 05:03:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84542 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 05:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84532 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 05:03:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:03:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.187] (HELO mail-yw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.211.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:03:44 +0000 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so3778491ywh.2 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:03:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oRku0ZSVTXDikzJVW1Y2JBe/04c22IH1TKR6u4W449U=; b=MBFe0K2yM8PPQmtnF9SN+JAtjUVxlHgwlizAe+RSphtGlAQdOPhshRSjr9A22SO4Et mAvtCSbrpzbomMoQ6VsebqKz4LxxHiPp27HBFFukWq+gZMEwcQ1UI6mWBhQ/fYDeH9kg npJjyeKsqLyLc0cn4TemOtupJC3f5N9Pxt/IY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FQvPXfRPYfc+feIey+63PFxWRg5XIk5aTfA8MUzaPzIjhmbX9wF9/a8l0wrgd+YAvo Onspib3AP00ih0f7pHbDy/L8iwAsjlMiekR9hVhH5h7smlbm6deg1dMOrXshrKU4cI+8 kTxbB3jPwlpCjK5U5DbtC5vBfqgQZIqlR9Pu0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.243.12 with SMTP id q12mr9777239ybh.233.1264482203207; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:03:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71001250838s35572132jc84b220379549092@mail.gmail.com> References: <002001ca9d97$a8ba13b0$2401120a@china.huawei.com> <78568af11001250112v3b610478w49703d72306d4a2f@mail.gmail.com> <78568af11001250113k41f303ffq8d0eb4ea5bc33523@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71001250838s35572132jc84b220379549092@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:03:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RE: set how much CPU to be utilised by a MapReduce job From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: naveenkumarp@huawei.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One thing that you might want to consider is to increase the replication factor. This might take a lot of disk space, but also might increase the performance. You might also want to check out: Sun Grid Engine Hadoop Integration http://blogs.sun.com/templedf/entry/beta_testing_the_sun_grid --- Gautam On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > If you can require a recent kernel, you could use cgroups: > > http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/06/manage-your-performance-with-cgroups-and-projects.html > > No one has integrated this with hadoop yet as it's still pretty new, and > Hadoop clusters are meant to be run on unshared hardware. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > >> The only thing you could do is to have the tasktracker nice the child when >> its exceeding its reservation. Aside from that, its hard to limit without >> killing a process. >> >> On Jan 25, 2010 12:23 AM, "Naveen Kumar Prasad" >> wrote: >> >> >> This functionality may not be readily available with Hadoop. >> >> But it would be appreciable if anyone can help me in understanding how to >> go >> about developing this feature. >> >> Regards, Naveen Kumar HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo >> >> Address: Huawei Industrial Base Bantian Longgang Shenzhen 518129, P.R.China >> www.huawei.com ---------... >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Allen Wittenauer [mailto: >> awittenauer@linkedin.com] Sent: Monday, J... >> > From general-return-979-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 16:48:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39245 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 16:48:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 16:48:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69803 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 16:48:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69082 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 16:48:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69007 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 16:48:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:48:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.213] (HELO mail-ew0-f213.google.com) (209.85.219.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:48:18 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so5618159ewy.12 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:47:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TJd2g1WXOWQtpWIRLwje33fy/S/7l9tkTpaPMP5pv3o=; b=AvfShjRtDjGWokbqvLXyRRS8UzgGrtxf4ojxeZ568W7hgR6v/b9j5ASBdRp/uPOkMs N+6Re0705OY6uTwfUBqAjbNWGUdVMN/pn1FLyWfGmdpfwFzFO1+AfLCrtAPcPCA9ZzZX EMoAmRXuSbyLQDqHDn+RvO5Vr8lCFOpgnACKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=V4EM9bJhM8xEA50J4dKYyDqnd0gtEXscUgOR/bPR2kcQclaROpIG9+vlUw/cS8o/u2 H2LcNeCaJo8pdsXSrc5Wpwrg8jUGzy/Xzvt+NWydwFfhLbd0Sw46FuOUON7zw7XHdYQ5 bP8/4VZRZHakU01AJbV+Hy6tV3kT9B6YzRDfc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.80 with SMTP id b58mr472883wef.73.1264524477092; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:47:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:47:57 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Performance of EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab03444533c047e140c76 --0016e6dab03444533c047e140c76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can give me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. Here are the details: I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper (*c1.medium*) with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* seconds. 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* seconds. 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances with *20 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* seconds! Two main questions: 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers it runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with fewer reducers.. 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance improvement doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the machine power, but I don't know how to do that. Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt from this mailing list in the past that I am using: 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for all jobs. 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); table.setAutoFlush(false); table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); 3) For every Put I do this: Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); put.setWriteToWAL(false); 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the formula is: # of workers * 1.75. Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. --0016e6dab03444533c047e140c76-- From general-return-980-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 18:04:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80801 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 18:04:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 18:04:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 97881 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97350 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97200 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:04:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:04:46 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2774131qyk.5 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:04:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a3bnVL2qcTNkjdX2GLerdV4MIMVeBj1Iru1cyXIvba0=; b=vCMCuAav2CHqPHKAVXmcdmeSD261Il4w8WBIO0AQEgkXtoyFUzSKz326niJg8oTmQ6 XXz8DlgLlxBX9sICRg8we4MS4dw9SOIFdW5TG/RQvNrD8axSNotRma+bz2mrTpVDmMap KsptcAELurRbn50WTArnVtGnL32CbTf9pRoKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=pWSA2dasxwUnbo72Qb2+tYZRVCU6uPyUJVK9JBPhGJjdsKgYIkiqDMmqxgM4R9b2VC rLvnCJqQc0deLEL4u8GsG1grl0GIYqdF06MyaPoZeX0GuZCsw9Aecvo2KdmVaRusLqL8 B8aMYvduoQPi8cGWc8i0lws7PObwHuYlI7lHg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.59.203 with SMTP id m11mr4591548qch.94.1264529062607; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:04:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:04:22 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0345e7bfa062f0d1 Message-ID: <7c962aed1001261004j22bd5af4vf937f3dd970d0c94@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 From: Stack To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something wrote: > I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. =A0If someone can= give > me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. > =A0Here are the details: > > I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase > 0.20.2 =A0I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: > > 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper (*c1.medium= *) > with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *849= * > =A0seconds. How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? > > 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper =A0*ALL m1.small* instances with *8 > Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *906* second= s. > > 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers =A0*ALL m1.small* instances wi= th *20 > Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *984* second= s! > How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase, in particular the time spent inserting into hbase? (Starts at 66% IIRC) > > Two main questions: > > 1) =A0It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducer= s it > runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with few= er > reducers.. Yes. My guess is that on the small instances, that if you ran the job multiple times that there would be large variance in how long it takes to complete. > 2) =A0As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance improv= ement > doesn't justify the high cost difference. =A0I must not be utilizing the > machine power, but I don't know how to do that. > The main reason for xlarge is that the platform is more predictable in its performance profile than small sized instances. I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your jobs completed. I'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs are spending their time? Is it all doing hbase inserts? Are inserts to a new table? > Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt f= rom > this mailing list in the past that I am using: > > 1) =A0conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); =A0 I have this for= all > jobs FYI, you can set this on the Scan instance rather than globally in the conf. Just FYI. > > 2) =A0Using the following code every time I open a HTable: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0this.table =3D new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "table= nameXYZ"); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0table.setAutoFlush(false); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? > > 4) =A0Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. =A0I believe = the > formula is: =A0# of workers * 1.75. You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that tasktrackers and datanodes running on the same node can impinge upon each other, often to the regionservers detriment. Thats enough for now. I'm sure others on list have opinions on the above. St.Ack From general-return-981-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 18:15:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88818 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 18:15:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 18:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17596 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:15:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17533 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17523 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 18:15:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:15:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:15:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 88530 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 18:15:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [172.16.61.34]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:15:01 +0000 Message-ID: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:15:00 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: avro in mapreduce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would like to call folks attention to MAPREDUCE-1126. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1126 This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in Mapreduce. Aaron proposed a design in early December, building on the design Tom developed last summer and committed in September in HADOOP-6165. Aaron's design was approved, and, after several rounds of reviews, I committed Aaron's patch on 11 January. On 15 January Owen reverted this commit without warning. It seems that Owen objects to the path initiated last July in HADOOP-6165. Aaron has also contributed MAPREDUCE-815, which permits one to use Avro for all phases of Mapreduce. When that issue is committed, the primary chain of Avro integration into Mapreduce will be complete. Can others please take the time to read this issue and express their opinions? Thank you, Doug From general-return-982-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 18:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1468 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 18:33:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 18:33:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 46824 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:33:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46753 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:33:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46743 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 18:33:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:33:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:33:34 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so4124806gxk.9 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:33:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K0hKScuw2+Otq1EG24yZYxpbE5XNL6aVDekv9nA3g34=; b=Lkk4cf9PRfYoiC93JEnqIRmqQUHy0hgf4FmZzCuBitfBPyckRs7c4Yq0I6Nv2WMWA0 FzEcFwHeyYrMbYrrL6rBNNdTvQAPbrTOWvr486HyONG5pfz2eLQcH2bNGhngvM9xVcyP TYHO0FwiVPz2wAojzqP3UaMDC8WvGZm6FHx3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=aFw21AvAlu39ACG7nwZPEVRSWXJtyS0Rqui1XRvo7nyD9WfdGiMjzOYj/unF2eqpTh S0JFHiXirtlxfv14OGnmT5fyzsY2alLMfOKMAV+Q2VcuKOa0tKeNHPhKhDRzWzO+puiN 4vHVBHCYukK3Q+hFM4d8AWDOzC0zXhurKXmuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.91.142.16 with SMTP id u16mr948491agn.11.1264530792497; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:33:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <31a243e71001261026v3de25f31i2ef741d430787279@mail.gmail.com> References: <31a243e71001261026v3de25f31i2ef741d430787279@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:33:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2d6182eee9871b01 Message-ID: <31a243e71001261033qcd76c5ahf69ddcb32e1d3fbd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: ANN: hbase 0.20.3 is available for download From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! We are proud to announce that hbase 0.20.3 is available for download: http://hbase.org/releases.html. Eighty four issues have been addressed since hbase 0.20.2. =A0The release notes are available here: http://su.pr/16X1Cr.=A0Please upgrade at your convenience. A rolling upgrade is possible from 0.20.1 and 0.20.2 but not from 0.20.0. This is the third bug fix release in the 0.20 branch and it also contains new EC2 scripts, a new indexation contribution called IHBase, better JMX metrics and much more. Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Yours, The HBase Team From general-return-983-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 18:37:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9918 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 18:37:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 18:37:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 53469 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:37:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53370 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 18:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53349 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 18:37:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:37:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:37:10 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so4128174gxk.9 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:36:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SHgQNBDqqSGLj7S4fPMYNbav4hVeBPeBnQbAE0QjwHg=; b=uc3FWUXLUZTTjDFyDP1VV189ypCj2ALwzoLdBJok7ZHHN19zaqJnsrUDB5/Q3PacqO HSSRx8I8TiBO/sA93MbtBrSpGHRo5RrDXmpw1poqrCbs8jRqHyXZ+jK/1zpWu92hy2Oi UR9zNX/57Kf/ufacKJMCJX/eNqnHZ2xUYAFUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YhyeJDL76iG8fhacHvzQCBcGyQDAk9SqvDvSMa8hT8Vwx5bnA8LbDlSrQdrN7N04zN ZuCMG0JRL9osoTR3Q9dQRcr0AXQVJ+fdVXYz4BB6TjMIOcKCfwaau6WEQ2tj7H0Kct+W h5Tl+cNNCYG9GFtqj5Fkl3QjT0lvjoJ9BVrMU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.13.27 with SMTP id 27mr1789212agm.28.1264531000746; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:36:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:36:40 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 863795c5d95ea82e Message-ID: <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How big is your dataset? J-D On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something wrote: > I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. =A0If someone can= give > me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. > =A0Here are the details: > > I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase > 0.20.2 =A0I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: > > 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper (*c1.medium= *) > with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *849= * > =A0seconds. > > 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper =A0*ALL m1.small* instances with *8 > Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *906* second= s. > > 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers =A0*ALL m1.small* instances wi= th *20 > Reducers *for every Reduce task. =A0The process completed in *984* second= s! > > > Two main questions: > > 1) =A0It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducer= s it > runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with few= er > reducers.. > 2) =A0As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance improv= ement > doesn't justify the high cost difference. =A0I must not be utilizing the > machine power, but I don't know how to do that. > > Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt f= rom > this mailing list in the past that I am using: > > 1) =A0conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); =A0 I have this for= all > jobs. > > 2) =A0Using the following code every time I open a HTable: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0this.table =3D new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "table= nameXYZ"); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0table.setAutoFlush(false); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); > > 3) =A0For every Put I do this: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Put put =3D new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0put.setWriteToWAL(false); > > 4) =A0Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. =A0I believe = the > formula is: =A0# of workers * 1.75. > > Any other hints? =A0As always, greatly appreciate the help. =A0Thanks. > From general-return-984-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 19:20:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25686 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 19:20:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 19:20:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 39748 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39630 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 19:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39611 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:20:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.221] (HELO mail-fx0-f221.google.com) (209.85.220.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:20:32 +0000 Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so901466fxm.29 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:20:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VFytQRjpRzI3V/rj5unGfz+04mz0/xgNeOD45JTOGSU=; b=AYI66ly4dpgm9YOsb2ZR2Jhc6xdSkZvGIbW7y+eShG4Gg9C/B/jTpjKmepnBFngjA1 USVaL5Go6Tb2GBUwyLr7UlOBlLxolvIqxGFaVTOojoweWAcrK6A2DDB0voWbjwXbpYn5 dR3uBWsd7OZfGsoTe1LtEkTDZ2lA89PqTRe9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tIwBhQUAK9+D/EL00rgYE2oEDV7ZbRhcz8n3JXkeyMMYxv8GfhHYpvgR0yubfptVA+ 3P9xs4/vHHARjTsznva7rn6NURbkqMmdJZAD2aYPIESwmZDxViZFbDrbBfYLfbnCQyzw 0rBYM4J5h9ieBs3Vk9Ms+MG1et6QmXumuY0bI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.205 with SMTP id c55mr1434407wef.186.1264533603897; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:20:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:20:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d56652445117047e162cf9 --0016e6d56652445117047e162cf9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here are some of the answers: >> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could be a problem. Please let me know. >>'d suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs are spending their time? I agree. Will do some more research :) >>How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of the critical code is. >>Are inserts to a new table? Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? >>I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your jobs completed. But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! >>Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close table in the 'cleanup' method. >>You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... I will try a few combinations. >>How big is your dataset? This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. Here's approximately how many rows get processed: Phase 1: 300 rows Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) Thanks for the help. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > How big is your dataset? > > J-D > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something > wrote: > > I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can > give > > me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. > > Here are the details: > > > > I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase > > 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: > > > > 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper > (*c1.medium*) > > with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* > > seconds. > > > > 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 > > Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* seconds. > > > > 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances with > *20 > > Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* seconds! > > > > > > Two main questions: > > > > 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers > it > > runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with > fewer > > reducers.. > > 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance > improvement > > doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the > > machine power, but I don't know how to do that. > > > > Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt > from > > this mailing list in the past that I am using: > > > > 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for all > > jobs. > > > > 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: > > this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); > > table.setAutoFlush(false); > > table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); > > > > 3) For every Put I do this: > > Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); > > put.setWriteToWAL(false); > > > > 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the > > formula is: # of workers * 1.75. > > > > Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. > > > --0016e6d56652445117047e162cf9-- From general-return-985-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 19:44:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31960 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 19:44:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 19:44:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 79047 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 19:44:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78955 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 19:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78932 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 19:44:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:44:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:44:39 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.243] (wifi-e-135-243.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.243]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o0QJiF9W060174; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:44:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:44:16 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Re "Amazon predictability", did you guys see this recent paper: http://people.csail.mit.edu/tromer/cloudsec/ Also some addl background on "noisy neighbor effects": http://bit.ly/4O7dHx http://bit.ly/8zPvQd Some interesting bits of information in there. Patrick Something Something wrote: > Here are some of the answers: > >>> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? > I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could be a > problem. Please let me know. > >>> 'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs > are spending their time? > I agree. Will do some more research :) > >>> How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? > Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of the > critical code is. > >>> Are inserts to a new table? > Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop > HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? > >>> I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your > jobs completed. > But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am > paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! > >>> Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? > I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close table > in the 'cleanup' method. > >>> You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... > I will try a few combinations. > >>> How big is your dataset? > This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. > Here's approximately how many rows get processed: > Phase 1: 300 rows > Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. > (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) > > Thanks for the help. > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > >> How big is your dataset? >> >> J-D >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something >> wrote: >>> I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can >> give >>> me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. >>> Here are the details: >>> >>> I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase >>> 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: >>> >>> 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper >> (*c1.medium*) >>> with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* >>> seconds. >>> >>> 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 >>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* seconds. >>> >>> 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances with >> *20 >>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* seconds! >>> >>> >>> Two main questions: >>> >>> 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers >> it >>> runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with >> fewer >>> reducers.. >>> 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance >> improvement >>> doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the >>> machine power, but I don't know how to do that. >>> >>> Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt >> from >>> this mailing list in the past that I am using: >>> >>> 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for all >>> jobs. >>> >>> 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: >>> this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); >>> table.setAutoFlush(false); >>> table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); >>> >>> 3) For every Put I do this: >>> Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); >>> put.setWriteToWAL(false); >>> >>> 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the >>> formula is: # of workers * 1.75. >>> >>> Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. >>> > From general-return-986-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 26 20:50:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53849 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 20:50:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 20:50:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 65548 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 20:50:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65466 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 20:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65447 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 20:50:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:50:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.216] (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:49:54 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so5929674ewy.29 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:49:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xdAiVdUApHFyU5LjF180+W7VLlx8csugxApFVC6Jly8=; b=SiJZFDDMcvu86jReDl86Nt1b4AykCUpwB1s5bROFqN/4uvdeCqqPDaFV9+UDV05kv/ WJGvHo+ESENP3KU/TGSmdn3SiZxGLz3OjMpdylLLYOAYR+We/VqaeVL54yvU/J0au5AL R3g6x6WtLFXw/fxLbjroc/TXdn6ckh2S6Wm2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=WDrfgaGsqtfZNu6nmp10Iw6YrblkyK5h/qTQfJUMM/CMOg2wjsz0HnFRRhlfjUo4Kr HhHb41GYRSVuH1lBfqeHly1CEjBKuk+hCLRkKMDGQjerBGsiMSJMSzrWR19sGNyFeX5d 5ZndL0GNCja+x0EyYO7qqzeIT9RBGjNXE89ug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.11 with SMTP id x11mr166527wee.16.1264538971642; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:49:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:49:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6453a359a7a047e176c6d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d6453a359a7a047e176c6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Wow.. how naive I am to think that I could trust Amazon. Thanks for forwarding the links, Patrick. Seems like Amazon's reliability has gone down considerably over the past few months. (Occasionally my instances fail on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to think I was doing something dumb!) But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to indicate otherwise. I guess, I will have to look for alternatives to Amazon EC2. Any one has any recommendations? Thanks again. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Re "Amazon predictability", did you guys see this recent paper: > http://people.csail.mit.edu/tromer/cloudsec/ > > Also some addl background on "noisy neighbor effects": > http://bit.ly/4O7dHx > http://bit.ly/8zPvQd > > Some interesting bits of information in there. > > Patrick > > > Something Something wrote: > >> Here are some of the answers: >> >> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? >>>> >>> I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could >> be a >> problem. Please let me know. >> >> 'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs >>>> >>> are spending their time? >> I agree. Will do some more research :) >> >> How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? >>>> >>> Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of >> the >> critical code is. >> >> Are inserts to a new table? >>>> >>> Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop >> HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? >> >> I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your >>>> >>> jobs completed. >> But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am >> paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! >> >> Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? >>>> >>> I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close >> table >> in the 'cleanup' method. >> >> You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... >>>> >>> I will try a few combinations. >> >> How big is your dataset? >>>> >>> This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. >> Here's approximately how many rows get processed: >> Phase 1: 300 rows >> Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. >> (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans > >wrote: >> >> How big is your dataset? >>> >>> J-D >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can >>>> >>> give >>> >>>> me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. >>>> Here are the details: >>>> >>>> I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase >>>> 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: >>>> >>>> 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper >>>> >>> (*c1.medium*) >>> >>>> with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* >>>> seconds. >>>> >>>> 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 >>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* >>>> seconds. >>>> >>>> 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances >>>> with >>>> >>> *20 >>> >>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* >>>> seconds! >>>> >>>> >>>> Two main questions: >>>> >>>> 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers >>>> >>> it >>> >>>> runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with >>>> >>> fewer >>> >>>> reducers.. >>>> 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance >>>> >>> improvement >>> >>>> doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the >>>> machine power, but I don't know how to do that. >>>> >>>> Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt >>>> >>> from >>> >>>> this mailing list in the past that I am using: >>>> >>>> 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for >>>> all >>>> jobs. >>>> >>>> 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: >>>> this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); >>>> table.setAutoFlush(false); >>>> table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); >>>> >>>> 3) For every Put I do this: >>>> Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); >>>> put.setWriteToWAL(false); >>>> >>>> 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the >>>> formula is: # of workers * 1.75. >>>> >>>> Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. >>>> >>>> >> --0016e6d6453a359a7a047e176c6d-- From general-return-987-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 27 22:13:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25910 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 22:13:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 22:13:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 55532 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 22:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55448 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 22:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55438 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2010 22:12:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:12:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:12:49 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so45023fga.11 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.87.55.18 with SMTP id h18mr2085691fgk.65.1264630342362; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from wlan-snve-152-48.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip11.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm1068216fgb.10.2010.01.27.14.12.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:21 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:17 -0800 References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating > Avro in > Mapreduce. Getting Avro types passing through MapReduce is a good goal. I apologize for not seeing the issue before it was committed. I accept some of the blame for that because I've buried in Hadoop emails. That said, it is important to realize that with changes that radically change the user's interaction with the framework require a lot of discussion. This jira, as you've admitted, had a very unrepresentative subject and description, which means that very few people were following it. Additionally, there has been no design document on the change to the MapReduce framework's paradigm, so it wasn't clear what you were doing until this patch was committed. Such a large change should have been highlighted on the public dev lists. In the future, I would strongly suggest all developers planning on making massive incompatible changes to post a design document on the public dev lists outside of Jira to ensure the discussion happens before instead of after the patch has been committed. In terms of reverting the patch, I had fundamental issues with the changes and felt that we needed more time to discuss them. Allowing the patch to stay in trunk would bake it further and further in and make reverting it much harder. I've listed my issues on the jira, but at a high level my concerns are: 1. Changing API compatibility is very expensive. 2. Changing the semantics is even more expensive. 3. We are discussing several alternatives on the jira. Unlike Python and Linux, Apache has a democratic process and we have to work together to build consensus. The Apache rules are that a single -1 from a committer blocks the change from being made. Occasionally that has cost us a lot of time. For example, a single -1 from a committer on an implementation detail of the symlink patch blocked it for more than a year. We need to work together to find a solution that everyone can live with. -- Owen From general-return-988-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 27 23:23:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50287 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 23:23:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 23:23:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 34085 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 23:23:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34020 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 23:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34009 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2010 23:23:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:17 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so66694pwi.29 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.87.23 with SMTP id k23mr7049215rvb.292.1264634577316; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.32.99.70? ([166.205.139.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm280250pzk.7.2010.01.27.15.22.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:22:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <25503BF5-32A5-4A0D-BB0A-5CD34D5F163A@apache.org> From: Doug Cutting To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7D11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11) Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:22:48 -0800 References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> Since you raise it, my veto on the symlink patch was to one aspect for which implemented alternatives existed that no one vetoed. My understanding is that the reason this was delayed a year was primarily the absence of good tests. The issue was rapidly revived once Eli started addressing the tests. A compromise to the vetoed issue was rapidly found. So I don't see that my veto was the primary source of delay on that issue. Also, that veto was of one point in a large patch that had not yet been committed that I had been actively involved in the design of. Plus Dhruba, its primary author, while he did not veto, did agree with my view, so I was not alone in it. [Sent from mobile] On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating >> Avro in >> Mapreduce. > > Getting Avro types passing through MapReduce is a good goal. > > I apologize for not seeing the issue before it was committed. I > accept some of the blame for that because I've buried in Hadoop > emails. That said, it is important to realize that with changes that > radically change the user's interaction with the framework require a > lot of discussion. This jira, as you've admitted, had a very > unrepresentative subject and description, which means that very few > people were following it. Additionally, there has been no design > document on the change to the MapReduce framework's paradigm, so it > wasn't clear what you were doing until this patch was committed. > Such a large change should have been highlighted on the public dev > lists. In the future, I would strongly suggest all developers > planning on making massive incompatible changes to post a design > document on the public dev lists outside of Jira to ensure the > discussion happens before instead of after the patch has been > committed. > > In terms of reverting the patch, I had fundamental issues with the > changes and felt that we needed more time to discuss them. Allowing > the patch to stay in trunk would bake it further and further in and > make reverting it much harder. > > I've listed my issues on the jira, but at a high level my concerns > are: > > 1. Changing API compatibility is very expensive. > 2. Changing the semantics is even more expensive. > 3. We are discussing several alternatives on the jira. > > Unlike Python and Linux, Apache has a democratic process and we have > to work together to build consensus. The Apache rules are that a > single -1 from a committer blocks the change from being made. > Occasionally that has cost us a lot of time. For example, a single > -1 from a committer on an implementation detail of the symlink patch > blocked it for more than a year. We need to work together to find a > solution that everyone can live with. > > -- Owen From general-return-989-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 06:04:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83111 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 06:04:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 06:04:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 2348 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 06:04:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2149 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 06:04:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2120 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 06:04:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:04:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alex.baranov.v@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.199] (HELO mail-yx0-f199.google.com) (209.85.210.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:04:45 +0000 Received: by yxe37 with SMTP id 37so330738yxe.31 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:04:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gz5H5r0WkNRc+0LxJn3eaNuB0XSWPrLCGPbECcHWjr8=; b=qWB1qT1JnSjSvJWvyFC5ZrXL0pc/SvOytIzUwEPikxFgnk7BmTvbNxpnuu3WH65vL0 s53/+ItUiTA2NPnDtT0FoyISPogkDcjo5zq+y678TzY4ygj8PUz9KF3DgMLC13Jykyg/ ZuWBmcyG67qxtxaxlDs97DJrmXospS573bYB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FJbxRDnI5MF1+lQd7R/5CcDtIX5c9DVWoioE5TZ1ZAcVeQX+lJbN8uPz+Eox0e76GM s4ecF3AtZUTKAT6z3xa3LVyw0umY+Ebj5oQkITv/53RNVtSMfUiYhwFMgMiGXSevv8Uw QGkwv3snnm9C0EBZ28EfdU10/I6/dHA4uYh5Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.11.40 with SMTP id o40mr6091634ani.143.1264658664093; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:04:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:04:24 +0200 Message-ID: <35dbe9101001272204x2df5c911xcd5d75703866f56@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: setNumReduceTasks(1) From: Alex Baranov To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045029fe06f7756047e334a5d --005045029fe06f7756047e334a5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Since MapReduce programming model defines only one "communication" point between jobs - the one that occurs after all Map tasks are done and before Reduce tasks begin I believe that anyway the solution to your problem will come at a price of lower performance. Although I don't think that while having 10 workers you should use "setNumReduceTasks(1)" tactics since the performance will be very degraded. Of course this depends on N number a lot: if N is quite small and everything you're going to output from your reduce task is going to lay down in one datanode then *may be* your strategy can be considered. If N is really very big and there is lot of work to do before Reducers should stop, then I'd consider communication throught storing the info about a progress in DFS (implementation will not be straightforward though, since we don't want to affect performance a lot). Alex. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the class > be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster > of > say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed to > be instantiated only on 1 machine? > > If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how > may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want > to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do > this? Please let me know. Thanks. > --005045029fe06f7756047e334a5d-- From general-return-990-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 07:27:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12341 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 07:27:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 07:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 59064 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58976 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74308 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 07:09:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=zJSpUPD1Y498S5YIcPwQw3vu7ka3avy65E0TWn9Sl6D0MNEWW6uE6glv8ABzNLuH Message-ID: <4B5E950A.1040306@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:38:58 +0530 From: Mridul Muralidharan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: setNumReduceTasks(1) References: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1321001251609r19e737e2s2fdd27f379aeea53@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8211a1321001251609r19e737e2s2fdd27f379aeea53@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jeff Zhang wrote: > *See my comments below* > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the class >> be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster >> of >> say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed to >> be instantiated only on 1 machine? >> >> *--Yes* > > >> If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how >> may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want >> to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do >> this? Please let me know. Thanks. >> > > *--Maybe you can use Counter to track the number of rows you add to HBase, > then you do not need to limit the reduce task as 1* > > Counter's are not synchronized in 'real-time' : so you cant use that to limit at addition time imo. It is more for aggregation, not realtime messaging. - Mridul From general-return-991-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 07:28:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12424 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 07:28:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59963 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59903 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66150 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2010 01:02:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 221941.18932.bm@omp124.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Message-ID: <973807.67980.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ZbwDR64VM1lwZu04CK.ug_58pfnXjqcfC7_.bmAsCygu_0_kRBLvlIgKEXX5hlENTPbMX44wDL0JG7f7TgK5Wx1IiTMUoX6j2ZlRqq2XT_YTVW5ip3hGkxy4iVlu6M0sBgQ_pxqMg5RDUN.gFzuMpKfUMwp75ho33GBTWllyr2eC99Pc1KHleYrnIBY8wQMQQ06wex2_qBYfipa75_QHdEdYB7fBk0imimEFFnbnr5AHGQkx3Q_9CbbqUdHxf7yqmdz8rASbrEcLHcp1EAXm7Xfu4.KUjjEGf54wGJNi8L2YwjwGFKpYHPfd8ECb03yR.TQFsb4KftFvuFIWTGXEqt0RctoetSMikXxOE7piRtndgcjCjiLVc0LkTrys7BOXJJth.fizbuDWXRcq65KKjUpWCK.kOMkdIv9niYX8qqnEV7351nJ7S7_7sJBDTUmVvBm6L0bIZvoSWXI- X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:01:36 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have observed "noisy neighbor" effects. If you are using HBase EC2 scripts, which run HBase region servers on all of the slaves colocated with tasktrackers and user tasks, I do not recommend using other than c1.xlarge instances. Our scripts use c1.medium instances for the separate Zookeeper quorum ensemble as they need fewer resources in terms of RAM but are still sensitive to io and cpu scheduling latencies. - Andy ----- Original Message ---- > From: Patrick Hunt > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:44:16 AM > Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 > > Re "Amazon predictability", did you guys see this recent paper: > http://people.csail.mit.edu/tromer/cloudsec/ > > Also some addl background on "noisy neighbor effects": > http://bit.ly/4O7dHx > http://bit.ly/8zPvQd > > Some interesting bits of information in there. > > Patrick > > Something Something wrote: > > Here are some of the answers: > > > >>> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? > > I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could be a > > problem. Please let me know. > > > >>> 'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs > > are spending their time? > > I agree. Will do some more research :) > > > >>> How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? > > Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of the > > critical code is. > > > >>> Are inserts to a new table? > > Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop > > HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? > > > >>> I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your > > jobs completed. > > But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am > > paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! > > > >>> Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? > > I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close table > > in the 'cleanup' method. > > > >>> You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... > > I will try a few combinations. > > > >>> How big is your dataset? > > This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. > > Here's approximately how many rows get processed: > > Phase 1: 300 rows > > Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. > > (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) > > > > Thanks for the help. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans > wrote: > > > >> How big is your dataset? > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something > >> wrote: > >>> I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can > >> give > >>> me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. > >>> Here are the details: > >>> > >>> I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase > >>> 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: > >>> > >>> 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper > >> (*c1.medium*) > >>> with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* > >>> seconds. > >>> > >>> 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 > >>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* seconds. > >>> > >>> 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances with > >> *20 > >>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* seconds! > >>> > >>> > >>> Two main questions: > >>> > >>> 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers > >> it > >>> runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with > >> fewer > >>> reducers.. > >>> 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance > >> improvement > >>> doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the > >>> machine power, but I don't know how to do that. > >>> > >>> Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt > >> from > >>> this mailing list in the past that I am using: > >>> > >>> 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for all > >>> jobs. > >>> > >>> 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: > >>> this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); > >>> table.setAutoFlush(false); > >>> table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); > >>> > >>> 3) For every Put I do this: > >>> Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); > >>> put.setWriteToWAL(false); > >>> > >>> 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the > >>> formula is: # of workers * 1.75. > >>> > >>> Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. > >>> > > From general-return-992-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 07:28:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12493 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 07:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 60820 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60772 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 07:28:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47671 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 07:09:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yDglIuIi0FHTucntkt8aGMnH4AakCWkzoLeK6OE4NnfoLrMJJ5EpduIZK7Ifm8G0 Message-ID: <4B61381E.6010805@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:39:18 +0530 From: Mridul Muralidharan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: setNumReduceTasks(1) References: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A possible solution is to emit only N rows from each mapper and then use 1 reduce task [*] - if value of N is not very high. So you end up with utmost m * N rows on reducer instead of full inputset - and so the limit can be done easier. If you ok with some sort of variance in the number of rows inserted (and if value of N is very high), you can do more interesting things like N/m' rows per mapper - and multiple reducers (r) : with assumtion that each reducer will see atleast N/r rows - and so you can limit to N/r per reducer : ofcourse, there is a possible error that gets introduced here ... Regards, Mridul [*] Assuming you just want simple limit - nothing else. Also note, each mapper might want to emit N rows instead of 'tweaks' like N/m rows, since it is possible that multiple mappers might have less than N/m rows to emit to begin with ! Something Something wrote: > If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the class > be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster of > say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed to > be instantiated only on 1 machine? > > If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how > may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want > to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do > this? Please let me know. Thanks. From general-return-993-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 08:30:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26231 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 08:30:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 08:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 34800 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 08:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34709 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 08:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34563 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 08:30:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:30:35 +0000 Received: from [10.72.168.35] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c35.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.35]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o0S8Tc0S012795; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:29:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B614AF2.2040401@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:29:38 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI, just noticed this one: Rackspace Cloud Servers versus Amazon EC2: Performance Analysis http://bit.ly/bkG1AB Patrick Something Something wrote: > Wow.. how naive I am to think that I could trust Amazon. Thanks for > forwarding the links, Patrick. Seems like Amazon's reliability has gone > down considerably over the past few months. (Occasionally my instances fail > on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to think > I was doing something dumb!) > > But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I > wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to indicate > otherwise. > > I guess, I will have to look for alternatives to Amazon EC2. Any one has > any recommendations? Thanks again. > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Re "Amazon predictability", did you guys see this recent paper: >> http://people.csail.mit.edu/tromer/cloudsec/ >> >> Also some addl background on "noisy neighbor effects": >> http://bit.ly/4O7dHx >> http://bit.ly/8zPvQd >> >> Some interesting bits of information in there. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> Something Something wrote: >> >>> Here are some of the answers: >>> >>> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? >>>> I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could >>> be a >>> problem. Please let me know. >>> >>> 'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs >>>> are spending their time? >>> I agree. Will do some more research :) >>> >>> How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? >>>> Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of >>> the >>> critical code is. >>> >>> Are inserts to a new table? >>>> Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop >>> HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? >>> >>> I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your >>>> jobs completed. >>> But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am >>> paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! >>> >>> Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? >>>> I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close >>> table >>> in the 'cleanup' method. >>> >>> You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... >>>> I will try a few combinations. >>> How big is your dataset? >>>> This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. >>> Here's approximately how many rows get processed: >>> Phase 1: 300 rows >>> Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. >>> (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) >>> >>> Thanks for the help. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans >>> wrote: >>> How big is your dataset? >>>> J-D >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can >>>>> >>>> give >>>> >>>>> me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. >>>>> Here are the details: >>>>> >>>>> I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase >>>>> 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: >>>>> >>>>> 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper >>>>> >>>> (*c1.medium*) >>>> >>>>> with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* >>>>> seconds. >>>>> >>>>> 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 >>>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* >>>>> seconds. >>>>> >>>>> 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances >>>>> with >>>>> >>>> *20 >>>> >>>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* >>>>> seconds! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Two main questions: >>>>> >>>>> 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers >>>>> >>>> it >>>> >>>>> runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with >>>>> >>>> fewer >>>> >>>>> reducers.. >>>>> 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance >>>>> >>>> improvement >>>> >>>>> doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the >>>>> machine power, but I don't know how to do that. >>>>> >>>>> Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt >>>>> >>>> from >>>> >>>>> this mailing list in the past that I am using: >>>>> >>>>> 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for >>>>> all >>>>> jobs. >>>>> >>>>> 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: >>>>> this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); >>>>> table.setAutoFlush(false); >>>>> table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); >>>>> >>>>> 3) For every Put I do this: >>>>> Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); >>>>> put.setWriteToWAL(false); >>>>> >>>>> 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the >>>>> formula is: # of workers * 1.75. >>>>> >>>>> Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> > From general-return-994-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 08:45:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30670 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 08:45:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 08:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 61914 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 08:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61836 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 08:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61826 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 08:45:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:45:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.73] (HELO n3b.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:45:05 +0000 Received: from [76.13.13.25] by n3.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2010 08:44:43 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.163] by t4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2010 08:44:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp104.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2010 08:44:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 797261.72291.bm@omp104.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 71464 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jan 2010 08:44:43 -0000 Message-ID: <547544.70925.qm@web65512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xyT17zMVM1npPUZbaFJYDK2kxNHAPwQ7TkFhZ61B6CXIsNqNahX5wYSEzWp3TpxQf2FKvl.TLQWWBrYRrLfXQJb0lpq1N4m009MSb.F6STU5_sgwWOMRMHT8pJ9aqu2vQHkcXVzNJ.FGajqmv5PiqxvZyIs838JQGQtcG2wHqNs6VZ8mRe4R4CB2HwEE0_t3LibuDiDn7THzJxOChR8Pm9QtyzgU0_gYDwh78SMckz0JkJvYK.Uanq_kqX9tyxnhjQyt7CyhjgzOFfKEZ8trduoFEKgYpW3buu0jdV6_FX.EUEGYNPLo9ILDKfQV.RMvVPabGYLCpx3XAeDHj3pJcW6iluczVLjriwP3QQ-- Received: from [66.135.63.56] by web65512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:44:43 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> <4B614AF2.2040401@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:44:43 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B614AF2.2040401@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I > > wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to indicate > > otherwise. No, that is not how EC2 and similar cloud infrastructure platforms work. You are given a virtual machine. The hypervisor multiplexes many virtual machines on a single physical server. The instance types purport to guarantee a certain level of performance measured in virtual CPU units. The EC2 website describes in detail how Amazon defines a virtual CPU unit. > > (Occasionally my instances fail > > on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to think > > I was doing something dumb!) That is also a misunderstanding of how to use cloud infrastructure. No single instance is reliable. The platform is a commodity, cheap, with basic usability. Durable services are built on top of these building blocks with service architecture that does not rely on the stability of any single instance. - Andy From general-return-995-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 12:05:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13172 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 12:05:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 12:05:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 39121 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 12:05:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39040 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 12:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39030 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 12:05:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.216] (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:05:08 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so649156ewy.29 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:04:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8nOB84QY2/SBebWDGAof07SnNJf82imO19g61M3kXcU=; b=EdryEgXHeHVxhpPO4RalI2d2eL+m3ZSZA8MviGdei503s2+3aKmBmq3y+6FsTLcejl E69hWhungRnbxR6/RoNt3ZiX93fRYxbBy4BgbtjAn1KKox4a9if8DpxfEhRcCVsSSCXQ 4oYNMbdIokD0atOZZQ1hxT+KME0W34eKJBejk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Q/JG6rgt8cAvkLQQVojJqY4MxOe0i+dWCcTd/GDodiLHFVBxWvUIb4sdveHm+tHw3c NUYdSy/FF94PnK6io2oKezeC8fYJFSSp89CT0TMZaJ/xfCLod8xCvAXMq4nhsnTSj2yd EZ+OWUAUBMG46zj/llpBkh496NOrDoM4qARSs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.0.148 with SMTP id 20mr2425191ebb.51.1264680286827; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:04:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:04:46 +0100 Message-ID: <61770b881001280404j28496d90s9aba0e617e13d62a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: 2nd Munich OpenHUG Meeting From: Lars George To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2nd Munich OpenHUG Meeting At the end of last year we had a first meeting in Munich to allow everyone interested in all things Hadoop and related technologies to gather, get to know each other and exchange their knowledge, experiences and information. We would like to invite for the second Munich OpenHUG Meeting and hope to see you all again and meet even more new enthusiasts there. We would also be thrilled if those attending would be willing to share their story so that we can learn about other projects and how people are using the exciting NoSQL related technologies. No pressure though, come along and simply listen if you prefer, we welcome anyone and everybody! When: Thursday February 25, 2009 at 5:30pm open end Where: eCircle AG, Nymphenburger Stra=DFe 86, 80636 M=FCnchen ["Bruckmann" Building, "U1 Mailinger Str", map http://www.ecircle.com/de/kontakt/anfahrt.html (in German) and look for the signs] Thanks again to Bob Schulze from eCircle to provide the location and projector. So far we have a talk scheduled by Christoph Rupp about HamsterDB (http://hamsterdb.com/). We are still looking for volunteers who would like to present on any related topic (please contact me at info@larsgeorge.com)! Otherwise we will have an open discussion about whatever is brought up by the attendees. Last but not least there will be something to drink and we will get pizzas in. Since we do not know how many of you will come we simply stay at the events location and continue our chats over food. Looking forward to seeing you there! Please RSVP here: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/5279322/BY/Mnchen/2nd-Munich-OpenHUG-Meetin= g/eCircle-AG https://www.xing.com/events/2nd-munich-openhug-meeting-458852 Best regards, Lars George From general-return-996-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 28 12:56:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34800 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 12:56:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 12:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 98870 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 12:56:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98775 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2010 12:56:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98756 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2010 12:56:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:56:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.216] (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:56:01 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so703277ewy.29 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:55:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dV7cqSXmRseUNTlTQjd4XVJ17tO3CEzARaQQFulCfzM=; b=BQiN86vTFCraVlKk3kZD4yfrl1HTbbk+58HT4fs87zDQdg0kkd/XERdYy0nKon0y7W iV9hr7Sreoj3ZdOlYW2HYz3LMmH9s54OH+r4DWKnUFWNYLAp/G3HIuhUpBz/OFRIprtM 9iCF51HmdWFXFDwT5fUem62ZYscNREPOOwpjE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MO5Nvm15m4Uu8VyL4KhomxSfr3PNASgHxNb3XKSZlYr94RFcHyCOUBpSmuQkoVErhW Y0IcG4oRsevQDHhgS65Vi6fmxOwIZxjL1vFu/dZt4esm5EtbA/52RrZvhlNmmJwPN2yZ fPnLnReelQ7ntHPE3WNUypGG9x7jiFbbHNTFk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.25.67 with SMTP id y3mr7936995ebb.73.1264683339676; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:55:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <61770b881001280403i59c6b60bs972a041c276acdd0@mail.gmail.com> References: <61770b881001280403i59c6b60bs972a041c276acdd0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:55:39 +0100 Message-ID: <61770b881001280455s1069ad0w24304f0d06ccb2d2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ANN] 2nd Munich OpenHUG Meeting From: Lars George To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, nosql-discussion@googlegroups.com, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Sorry, the year should of course say 2010, so the meeting is Feb 25th 2010. Sorry for the typo. Lars On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Lars George wrote: > 2nd Munich OpenHUG Meeting > > At the end of last year we had a first meeting in Munich to allow > everyone interested in all things Hadoop and related technologies to > gather, get to know each other and exchange their knowledge, > experiences and information. We would like to invite for the second > Munich OpenHUG Meeting and hope to see you all again and meet even > more new enthusiasts there. We would also be thrilled if those > attending would be willing to share their story so that we can learn > about other projects and how people are using the exciting NoSQL > related technologies. No pressure though, come along and simply listen > if you prefer, we welcome anyone and everybody! > > When: Thursday February 25, 2009 at 5:30pm open end > Where: eCircle AG, Nymphenburger Stra=DFe 86, 80636 M=FCnchen ["Bruckmann= " > Building, "U1 Mailinger Str", map > http://www.ecircle.com/de/kontakt/anfahrt.html (in German) and look > for the signs] > > Thanks again to Bob Schulze from eCircle to provide the location and > projector. So far we have a talk scheduled by Christoph Rupp about > HamsterDB (http://hamsterdb.com/). We are still looking for volunteers > who would like to present on any related topic (please contact me at > info@larsgeorge.com)! Otherwise we will have an open discussion about > whatever is brought up by the attendees. > > Last but not least there will be something to drink and we will get > pizzas in. Since we do not know how many of you will come we simply > stay at the events location and continue our chats over food. > > Looking forward to seeing you there! > > Please RSVP here: > > http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/5279322/BY/Mnchen/2nd-Munich-OpenHUG-Meet= ing/eCircle-AG > https://www.xing.com/events/2nd-munich-openhug-meeting-458852 > > Best regards, > > Lars George > From general-return-997-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 06:12:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53508 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 06:12:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 82531 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82367 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12569 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 02:35:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264732522; bh=BnB+aO7jYFe07bMKbBAtCkZ6YsBHIR2V3Uq4DYkum3k=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MplwP024rvGoRx6dOThC03YOjqtwVsp3c/WOI8+TM3qnGCls7kD5a2FhO5IkwZ8Y2YWT18Y3oiI449V6dYOludSU5EfJqY+h0BGSrgi2jCdE5/vpzpyxrH4OFdDm27c1nWgRyxHfQZAwFGmFDas9eKG7ZW39Nqbz+yzY1Jt4MMQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3XePBE9kgcNgaYtqhFdiLpPgo/V8SdSWQHCBTf09mw64GcUqCc/49d/ti6ARRNoC7qKcwXQsm5Nqe7CYrg2A3UPzLhByqEdz4lvUFezVoJ2vW4IN0SSahnuC3AGVMCQYfjtL+NdJvAZqIO6gcpRAOe5tC1uyVzC9mUUoZRSZhJE=; Message-ID: <397063.76800.qm@web50302.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: WvBJAOQVM1kd8w7hAeEyuX1KXvZK6TxQtp3LH76kSunZqD0F.Zpb0big1gcwN.LLlP6N8RMPQupKI_0Rdop3G_74LDDC7a5lQ8ewPVsPA9ztHQUCJ9ftwzCnoj4.ksZIf.6FYOuKJ7fu0sWMx6AmAvda8tfOPFnrGRQB0hH6cTP4lkIyjncYaJqvorCqN6K4hM0SN7EfSj0y3yvB1B6c.zKa32A9TfKXxK0ivl3e5Y4oDXnUnFOZjyCdGy_44FuNlVIbMSH9r6kb2abSkTXVjZUdplEprF1WzdUfEZ2NBojIj70vijJcQOPXGdJxo9Ie0h5YsWQPH4MhzR0VYunL4cTsG5qy6jyn4zGKHkd.C08yF6V_SHNt5QgYKRaDXtU_zX0YuFX.uvHylcva2bzacFJ8r9ZHq4KhK2miGpt_woIcFW17xQ8haU3c0UvFsqENAJvA6y7iWXMmwwb_elO1CNyit9z3kgZ_J2LvHVDMUcKMizB3NisHiWAoa9xC61WrCe0ga.LFQQ8bamTgIfeNN34klRqirX4uIHNboR6f395pzXWvmI4Zu6DJK6BAWjTCagimuW2BGWjji5xMkNA- X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:35:22 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the reserved EC2 instances just give you a better deal price-wise in exchange for an advanced payment and, essentially, a contract. I didn't see any mentions of reserved instances mean no sharing. If AWS did that, they'd be nothing more than a regular hosting service. Otis ---- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: Something Something > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, January 26, 2010 3:49:31 PM > Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 > > Wow.. how naive I am to think that I could trust Amazon. Thanks for > forwarding the links, Patrick. Seems like Amazon's reliability has gone > down considerably over the past few months. (Occasionally my instances fail > on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to think > I was doing something dumb!) > > But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I > wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to indicate > otherwise. > > I guess, I will have to look for alternatives to Amazon EC2. Any one has > any recommendations? Thanks again. > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Re "Amazon predictability", did you guys see this recent paper: > > http://people.csail.mit.edu/tromer/cloudsec/ > > > > Also some addl background on "noisy neighbor effects": > > http://bit.ly/4O7dHx > > http://bit.ly/8zPvQd > > > > Some interesting bits of information in there. > > > > Patrick > > > > > > Something Something wrote: > > > >> Here are some of the answers: > >> > >> How many concurrent reducers run on each node? Default two? > >>>> > >>> I was assuming 2 on each node would be the default. If not, this could > >> be a > >> problem. Please let me know. > >> > >> 'd suggest you spend a bit of time figuring where your MR jobs > >>>> > >>> are spending their time? > >> I agree. Will do some more research :) > >> > >> How much of this overall time is spent in reduce phase? > >>>> > >>> Mostly time is spent in the Reduce phases, because that's where most of > >> the > >> critical code is. > >> > >> Are inserts to a new table? > >>>> > >>> Yes, all inserts will always be in a new table. In fact, I disable/drop > >> HTables during this process. Not using any special indexes, should I be? > >> > >> I'm a little surprised that all worked on the small instances, that your > >>>> > >>> jobs completed. > >> But, really, shouldn't Amazon guarantee predictability :) After all I am > >> paying for these instances.. albeit a small amount! > >> > >> Are you opening a new table inside each task or once up in the config? > >>>> > >>> I open HTable in the 'setup' method for each mapper/reducer, and close > >> table > >> in the 'cleanup' method. > >> > >> You have to temper the above general rule with the fact that... > >>>> > >>> I will try a few combinations. > >> > >> How big is your dataset? > >>>> > >>> This one in particular is not big, but the real production ones will be. > >> Here's approximately how many rows get processed: > >> Phase 1: 300 rows > >> Phase 2 thru 8: 100 rows. > >> (Note: Each phase does complex calculations on the row.) > >> > >> Thanks for the help. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans > >> >wrote: > >> > >> How big is your dataset? > >>> > >>> J-D > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Something Something > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have noticed some strange performance numbers on EC2. If someone can > >>>> > >>> give > >>> > >>>> me some hints to improve performance that would be greatly appreciated. > >>>> Here are the details: > >>>> > >>>> I have a process that runs a series of Jobs under Hadoop 0.20.1 & Hbase > >>>> 0.20.2 I ran the *exact* same process with following configurations: > >>>> > >>>> 1) 1 Master & 4 Workers (*c1.xlarge* instances) & 1 Zookeeper > >>>> > >>> (*c1.medium*) > >>> > >>>> with *8 Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *849* > >>>> seconds. > >>>> > >>>> 2) 1 Master, 4 Workers & 1 Zookeeper *ALL m1.small* instances with *8 > >>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *906* > >>>> seconds. > >>>> > >>>> 3) 1 Master, *11* Workers & *3* Zookeepers *ALL m1.small* instances > >>>> with > >>>> > >>> *20 > >>> > >>>> Reducers *for every Reduce task. The process completed in *984* > >>>> seconds! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Two main questions: > >>>> > >>>> 1) It's totally surprising that when I have 11 workers with 20 Reducers > >>>> > >>> it > >>> > >>>> runs slower than when I have exactly same type of fewer machines with > >>>> > >>> fewer > >>> > >>>> reducers.. > >>>> 2) As expected it runs faster on c1.xlarge, but the performance > >>>> > >>> improvement > >>> > >>>> doesn't justify the high cost difference. I must not be utilizing the > >>>> machine power, but I don't know how to do that. > >>>> > >>>> Here are some of the performance improvements tricks that I have learnt > >>>> > >>> from > >>> > >>>> this mailing list in the past that I am using: > >>>> > >>>> 1) conf.set("hbase.client.scanner.caching", "30"); I have this for > >>>> all > >>>> jobs. > >>>> > >>>> 2) Using the following code every time I open a HTable: > >>>> this.table = new HTable(new HBaseConfiguration(), "tablenameXYZ"); > >>>> table.setAutoFlush(false); > >>>> table.setWriteBufferSize(1024 * 1024 * 12); > >>>> > >>>> 3) For every Put I do this: > >>>> Put put = new Put(Bytes.toBytes(out)); > >>>> put.setWriteToWAL(false); > >>>> > >>>> 4) Change the No. of Reducers as per the No. of Workers. I believe the > >>>> formula is: # of workers * 1.75. > >>>> > >>>> Any other hints? As always, greatly appreciate the help. Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> > >> From general-return-998-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 06:12:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53632 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 06:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 83292 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83229 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 06:12:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26469 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 05:05:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of arya_14@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Message-ID: <31ca9cdc8c4fa7a3328c796fbc105e60.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:34:59 +0530 Subject: How to obtain dynamic bandwidth From: "Arya" To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Old-Spam-Status: No hi all, Is there any way to obtain the dynamic bandwidth?. Is any command available to get the dynamic bandwidth?. Regards, Arya ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-999-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 08:33:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94926 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 08:33:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 08:33:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5670 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 08:33:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5568 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 08:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5558 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 08:33:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:43 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so1234061pwi.29 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LqRtrwl1iaP27du5eqMAcFwHA93x6MTllaYQf7Qy1R8=; b=BB4Qf2Fd6wn1+jeNRoWKSO8AwavNPLVua0kztpUJ0ONF5QeZ9I7Yy/mE0mpGj+qim2 c31HkWprIvJfM8CgJLJo13kiy/3W+ZNKne+hC0be0YHBVQ4Qvft5UiglyzLFLnjg7CCR IidvzlCSNcs6mRPMx73i8c6unlHRx5DeyvlLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pDKA45wUtdmxXBTEUjKVNhzZppfC18lEXOqfyJ8xkIS9x8I+R4sJsuFuNc8RmN3Psr 5nTaCPsSA/lt0NS/lMSBn65nkTulGCqbHG/IetaN58ekAjgcU1ORiAEpqvwT8fLm4zpI Vn4Ew9HVapxAzEQ0zezJtz3YyqWYFKVJL17Ys= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.17 with SMTP id c17mr404883wfj.13.1264754002402; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:33:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: <88f6e29a1001290033w3082734an480417a5bc53d45f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 23:12, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in >> Mapreduce. > > Getting Avro types passing through MapReduce is a good goal. > > I apologize for not seeing the issue before it was committed. I accept so= me > of the blame for that because I've buried in Hadoop emails. That said, it= is > important to realize that with changes that radically change the user's > interaction with the framework require a lot of discussion. This jira, as > you've admitted, had a very unrepresentative subject and description, whi= ch > means that very few people were following it. Additionally, there has bee= n > no design document on the change to the MapReduce framework's paradigm, s= o > it wasn't clear what you were doing until this patch was committed. =A0Su= ch a > large change should have been highlighted on the public dev lists. In the > future, I would strongly suggest all developers planning on making massiv= e > incompatible changes to post a design document on the public dev lists > outside of Jira to ensure the discussion happens before instead of after = the > patch has been committed. > > In terms of reverting the patch, I had fundamental issues with the change= s > and felt that we needed more time to discuss them. Allowing the patch to > stay in trunk would bake it further and further in and make reverting it > much harder. > > I've listed my issues on the jira, but at a high level my concerns are: > > 1. Changing API compatibility is very expensive. > 2. Changing the semantics is even more expensive. > 3. We are discussing several alternatives on the jira. > > Unlike Python and Linux, Apache has a democratic process Democratic? Not exactly. Some people have more rights than other's (committers have more rights than users, PMC members more rights than committers, PMC chairs have more rights than... oh wait, no - PMC chairs are just plain-old PMC members.). That's an important difference to make. Meriocratic would be the right term. > and we have to work > together to build consensus. The Apache rules are that a single -1 from a > committer blocks the change from being made. Occasionally that has cost u= s a > lot of time. For example, a single -1 from a committer on an implementati= on > detail of the symlink patch blocked it for more than a year. Vetos are very undemocratic. They exist to help the minority to not be overruled by the majority. But vetos have to be formally cast and justified. Simply reverting a patch is not vetoing. BTW, I cannot find the MAPREDUCE-1126 related discussion on any public ML - what am I missing? Which list do MAPREDUCE JIRA comments go to? Bernd > We need to work > together to find a solution that everyone can live with. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1000-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 12:01:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68815 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 12:01:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 12:01:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27789 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 12:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27741 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 12:01:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27731 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 12:01:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:01:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:01:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3D4B7DE9 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:59 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1GmY3q268hmH for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB8DB7DE2 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:52 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1265371242.38932@Yco8vohyeaXfvn362/yGFw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o0TC0e2D020896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:41 GMT Message-ID: <4B62CDE7.3050508@apache.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:00:39 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o0TC0e2D020896 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Something Something wrote: > Wow.. how naive I am to think that I could trust Amazon. Thanks for > forwarding the links, Patrick. Seems like Amazon's reliability has gone > down considerably over the past few months. (Occasionally my instances fail > on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to think > I was doing something dumb!) That's unfair. Large datacentres are inherently unreliable, because we build out them out of "normal availability" stuff rather than HA hardware. This then pushes the problem of availability down to the applications, to you. * Most of the problems people have been discussing are bandwidth issues; it may be that AWS is coming under some massive DDoS attack and you are seeing the fringes of it. It could be that your neighbours are noisy -but if you are running big Hadoop jobs, you are the noisy neighbour. * A more likely problem for you is where your machines are placed. If they all share a single switch, very high bandwidth. But if they are on different racks, the network becomes the bottleneck. > But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I > wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to indicate > otherwise. I think you only get exclusive use of a CPU when you rent an XL node. Reservations are a form of capacity planning, may or may not help with scheduling at all. From general-return-1001-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 16:56:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68597 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 16:56:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 16:56:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 90057 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 16:56:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90005 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 16:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6777 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 15:21:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Subject: Re: How to obtain dynamic bandwidth Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-281-855929077; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 From: Brian Bockelman X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <31ca9cdc8c4fa7a3328c796fbc105e60.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:20:54 -0600 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <7B8AEBB3-549C-41E2-9AD4-61C3FBFAC4AF@cse.unl.edu> References: <31ca9cdc8c4fa7a3328c796fbc105e60.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-281-855929077 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hey Arya, Try running Ganglia on your cluster: http://ganglia.sourceforge.net/ One of the statistics it collects is the network I/O rate. Also - for the future, you probably want to use the = common-user@hadoop.apache.org mailing list for these sort of general = questions. Brian On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:04 PM, Arya wrote: >=20 > hi all, >=20 > Is there any way to obtain the dynamic bandwidth?. Is any = command > available to get the dynamic bandwidth?. >=20 >=20 > Regards, > Arya >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ----------------------------------------- > This email was sent using TCEMail Service. > Thiagarajar College of Engineering > Madurai-625 015, India --Apple-Mail-281-855929077 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIICjCCA/gw ggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDESMBAGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAwMDBaFw0xMzAxMjUw ODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEg MB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYjYaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKC FciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3KlwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdL VG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0 yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4Vd Gy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNlaroPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3 rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4E FgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeow DwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLm ph5DBghZUVF8Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4v tQO1KDxgZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3Qghgk FIhmE1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBAowggLyoAMC AQICAwCB+zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPy LGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQD Ew1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTA5MDYwMjE5NDExM1oXDTEwMDYwMjE5NDExM1owYTETMBEGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUx HzAdBgNVBAMTFkJyaWFuIEJvY2tlbG1hbiA1MDQzMDcwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAw ggEKAoIBAQDPWEl7hBiuFRVBSY4SwvG0HpkCZi74a0BeD0tNARgxoQVJ7jhJjR3G4y8ino0/5axt 2EEfIWUE+DVpV37IWOQl8q/wdvicnhbfjByxBbq4sfWPLepU7+Kd8k1FKHRHermARn9VxEkFLrLB Gp7O5EX4mFHDaQy+Vv0thtA+m4qKoM+DA/8cOkJA5Rn6ZS/v/vtBzJh9HimVnhBx4+rw2cvKN+7r lKsm7qTn9TCZmrQ97CvBEXSkHS11m8vYF6ZwcTgSCJM0M9nnX5JilupQO1vDICXSUZeWX2xpsqeL x1PFGWgDaYXxFGtTRt2Qc9EPwf9Dr72xGPbKN8u5HylpOMDnAgMBAAGjgcIwgb8wEQYJYIZIAYb4 QgEBBAQDAgWgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBTKGR0Sjm6kOF1C1DEOCNvZjRcN XTAYBgNVHSAEETAPMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMAMD4GA1UdHwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwu ZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4LmNybDAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRiYm9ja2VsbUBj c2UudW5sLmVkdTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAp6KjcWnfnH/MGlUkUWstE9gtPeymHp+2r4zI w8JXigncJh/8qpSZqBcVhD24WFowI95otblrKYNZKW9f2G/hWwDSxZFqHhCDxFO12vDthrzOc3EH CwypJPvIlZPt/E/x93XruzPxJwPz84DKKuPoJAMeNlADbd+92YtRr2y+VuMpgZaebMAoeCdWH8Cq Y8xheNMajf8uiImBbatDuCu7qRvhwgxsMNLHEt4h853K1Zc181RlFGXG1+uL/Q/8VeKiASiCu+7L 1zpfLg7OCr6rJHb5S7wU+CeAvzSqmyy0fd2mwPeiX7huK+Cw4UjaB3yGKItzWT+KQJnV//wcSrzZ dTGCAv0wggL5AgEBMHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERP RUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3Jp ZHMgQ0EgMQIDAIH7MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFiMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJ KoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDEyOTE1MjA1NFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFNOxhbv1AtTrpifP64i9 M3Q17jSJMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT 8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAIH7MIGBBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBB dXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAIH7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIB AMTiLQPK00js1Z3nIuflBWs2ZQYF42srrBJ2/2snZzXKn1VM1YusCn/aC70pXew2m8JsmRC4dwcw 3973KeCjLH7cABpr+xWWFhdRvZfQjr4ZeNVOcIIBJaLkIIP2NhWjqrVMdVxqc6eTMgOJQenczCHf Et+sIFgdLQuk6/8aoW9p0euPFtyNUulIOdSrHFgGZs4EyHkIbxrlAIBsAcNe5PzkdtC+Ty+DkDOZ 4GkdzddKYOm4WQ/EwWQoU6RHBGWaVnfwSjJAWIQkampMbZ2Aw8ZUAfRA4859N7iFVxLvrB9u5EFW espLriL3waVHCSZwd58pIBGO6MtetclDS6W+W7cAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-281-855929077-- From general-return-1002-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 17:27:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80222 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 17:27:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 17:27:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 40650 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:27:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40560 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40550 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 17:27:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:27:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:27:10 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so173992wwb.35 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:26:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ck7GI3m8PlQxULfynx5EvOE2a/m3eJTqPZP61lTC2u8=; b=dJr8mdP391bJfsbQ+uXiztIy13DW64joL7JK7T9bW7lygwYMHxSHugtmQ8TabLrjn2 IubK1GQYB9CwF7EebEMF3tGkGsLpfw9Fe6Xow5yja/8+dQONhKYEUTnVfafrQ7P9QyIS QS+GUK1nvAE7X8GnytVANjlNGYfkqFZvSQPZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RwU/JQgZYelU9a80xx34D7YXI63D4cP07LF6AaETft9XlHmBoOgytZ30skwZpceW0o uKVNyFMcamky1wbmCtLDrgf9pPWfImsJP7yUuEoffZxqzu3s7Ofae3VNeqLskyHNvYLf uLgNQWw5dcT3qEmezw9t1Y3KrJsjifoe9fjpo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.73 with SMTP id g51mr609496wef.68.1264786009318; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:26:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B62CDE7.3050508@apache.org> References: <1eabbac31001260847g3a726f62o3a89ee2d74096e6e@mail.gmail.com> <31a243e71001261036t7d47bb7fo387e079cc8ed0974@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31001261120m74ee4817x3751592c930fd98b@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F4610.8050803@apache.org> <1eabbac31001261249s4b09fbdfyb886927b36c2953e@mail.gmail.com> <4B62CDE7.3050508@apache.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:26:49 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001290926u6166d9dck69303906e6227b62@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance of EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d58cb2cd6633047e50f024 --0016e6d58cb2cd6633047e50f024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks everyone for the replies. I agree I was being a bit unfair to Amazon. I apologize. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Something Something wrote: > >> Wow.. how naive I am to think that I could trust Amazon. Thanks for >> forwarding the links, Patrick. Seems like Amazon's reliability has gone >> down considerably over the past few months. (Occasionally my instances >> fail >> on startup or die in the middle for no apparent reason, and I used to >> think >> I was doing something dumb!) >> > > That's unfair. Large datacentres are inherently unreliable, because we > build out them out of "normal availability" stuff rather than HA hardware. > This then pushes the problem of availability down to the applications, to > you. > > > * Most of the problems people have been discussing are bandwidth issues; it > may be that AWS is coming under some massive DDoS attack and you are seeing > the fringes of it. It could be that your neighbours are noisy -but if you > are running big Hadoop jobs, you are the noisy neighbour. > > * A more likely problem for you is where your machines are placed. If they > all share a single switch, very high bandwidth. But if they are on different > racks, the network becomes the bottleneck. > > > > But what I don't understand is this... if I *reserve* an instance then I >> wouldn't be sharing its CPU with anyone, right? The blog seems to >> indicate >> otherwise. >> > > I think you only get exclusive use of a CPU when you rent an XL node. > Reservations are a form of capacity planning, may or may not help with > scheduling at all. > > > --0016e6d58cb2cd6633047e50f024-- From general-return-1003-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 17:36:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84772 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 17:36:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 52645 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52546 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52526 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:36:22 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so117967fgg.11 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=k7WYJGL8Q2qbBlqQzD9Uulzpg5GYb6F6dsjKi4QFSHg=; b=UQHlHAVpnGpHf45MHHr53oOXjzQF0G8R2HeS5FAYttFK7eGO25ulB6CWjMWrGGSJ3n Frc6enq3+Vbh6sU5iDpzxlIMpjOgAQjVqE3RZJFIaqQadPOgb++kR5RZTyuuy0cU7Ndr ENxJIHIZsjx94g/3qC9f1h5GI06D6T5uboyeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UiCKgWcPVcrD4BBGgu2ZYOntp5fJBU0PFWF/3zziYwSQvos0BjdbniJtkXIkPmb99O R8vSfs6za24qWFwPeuPZYIEtgMgb0mXVolbpQHkgIAzVScw1SYtcd2Lb54TRwqdydscz R8SRBXwG26AzrQ4TQGJQI83hYAOPLJ118tYSk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.81 with SMTP id d59mr686280wef.29.1264786560730; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B61381E.6010805@yahoo-inc.com> References: <1eabbac31001251522s2301f263rb959c768c2ee4d1@mail.gmail.com> <4B61381E.6010805@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:00 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac31001290936n17c8336eqa1b9b9c4d0ba2b76@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: setNumReduceTasks(1) From: Something Something To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7df76ab473a047e5111ff X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7df76ab473a047e5111ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am sorry, but I forgot to add one important piece of information. I don't want to write any random N rows to the table. I want to write the *top* N rows - meaning - I want to write the "key" values of the Reducer in descending order. Does this make sense? Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > A possible solution is to emit only N rows from each mapper and then use 1 > reduce task [*] - if value of N is not very high. > So you end up with utmost m * N rows on reducer instead of full inputset - > and so the limit can be done easier. > > > If you ok with some sort of variance in the number of rows inserted (and if > value of N is very high), you can do more interesting things like N/m' rows > per mapper - and multiple reducers (r) : with assumtion that each reducer > will see atleast N/r rows - and so you can limit to N/r per reducer : > ofcourse, there is a possible error that gets introduced here ... > > > Regards, > Mridul > > [*] Assuming you just want simple limit - nothing else. > Also note, each mapper might want to emit N rows instead of 'tweaks' like > N/m rows, since it is possible that multiple mappers might have less than > N/m rows to emit to begin with ! > > > > Something Something wrote: > >> If I set # of reduce tasks to 1 using setNumReduceTasks(1), would the >> class >> be instantiated only on one machine.. always? I mean if I have a cluster >> of >> say 1 master, 10 workers & 3 zookeepers, is the Reducer class guaranteed >> to >> be instantiated only on 1 machine? >> >> If answer is yes, then I will use static variable as a counter to see how >> may rows have been added to my HBase table so far. In my use case, I want >> to write only N number of rows to a table. Is there a better way to do >> this? Please let me know. Thanks. >> > > --0016e6d7df76ab473a047e5111ff-- From general-return-1004-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 17:36:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84980 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 17:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 54253 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54185 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54174 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 17:36:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:36:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.199] (HELO mail-yx0-f199.google.com) (209.85.210.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:36:34 +0000 Received: by yxe37 with SMTP id 37so1930648yxe.31 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.80.9 with SMTP id h9mr1489219anl.23.1264786572104; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:36:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1001290033w3082734an480417a5bc53d45f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> <88f6e29a1001290033w3082734an480417a5bc53d45f@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:35:52 -0800 Message-ID: <15da8a101001290935s3aff835bn1833f435a59cc27b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed718758d562047e5112f2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ed718758d562047e5112f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > Which list do MAPREDUCE JIRA comments go to? > mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org Some web sites archive it: http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org&q=mapreduce-1126 --001636ed718758d562047e5112f2-- From general-return-1005-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 18:07:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 958 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 18:07:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 18:07:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7075 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 18:07:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7004 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 18:07:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6994 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 18:07:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:07:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:07:41 +0000 Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bQX71d00617UAYkADW7ME2; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:07:21 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bW7C1d00G2SbwD58ZW7FbY; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:07:19 +0000 Message-Id: <62ADCD97-4476-4C7F-8915-8E442299FAB6@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1001290033w3082734an480417a5bc53d45f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:07:11 -0800 References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> <109E2151-6161-45C3-972F-2FA857CF8AA6@apache.org> <88f6e29a1001290033w3082734an480417a5bc53d45f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Democratic? Not exactly. It is completely democratic within the group that gets to vote. Python and Linux let the person who started the project have an absolutely final say, which is a very different model. > PMC chairs have more rights than. Actually, PMC chairs do have more rights, but they aren't very interesting rights. *smile* They are things like granting subversion karma to new committers that have been voted in by the PMC and writing the quarterly report on the state of the project for the Apache board. > But vetos have to be formally cast and justified. Simply reverting a > patch is not vetoing. I did veto the patch and gave my justification before I reverted it. For better or worse, the Apache rules say that -1 votes on code changes are binding. Trust me, I've been on the wrong side of a -1 and we had to work through to a compromise. It takes time, but the hope is that it leads to better software, which is the real goal. -- Owen From general-return-1006-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 29 18:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7559 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2010 18:21:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2010 18:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 29939 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 18:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29881 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2010 18:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29871 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2010 18:21:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:21:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:21:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18455DC3B8 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:20:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from vc136.vc.panix.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vc136.vc.panix.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PHREbpZesMjO for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:20:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (pool-96-246-67-178.nycmny.east.verizon.net [96.246.67.178]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCCFDC0A6 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:20:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B6326F5.4050307@lifeless.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:20:37 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: avro in mapreduce References: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B5F3124.4090004@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 1/26/10 1:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I would like to call folks attention to MAPREDUCE-1126. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1126 > > This is a key link in a series of issues involved in integrating Avro in > Mapreduce. Aaron proposed a design in early December, building on the > design Tom developed last summer and committed in September in > HADOOP-6165. Aaron's design was approved, and, after several rounds of > reviews, I committed Aaron's patch on 11 January. > > On 15 January Owen reverted this commit without warning. It seems that > Owen objects to the path initiated last July in HADOOP-6165. > > Aaron has also contributed MAPREDUCE-815, which permits one to use Avro > for all phases of Mapreduce. When that issue is committed, the primary > chain of Avro integration into Mapreduce will be complete. > > Can others please take the time to read this issue and express their > opinions? I'm coming at this from a place of far less information and commitment to the APIs but as it stands, the existing relationship between formats and types they support strikes me as odd. Currently mappers and reducers are written to a contract of a particular K/V type pair. Input and Output formats are currently aware of those types directly and are not sanity checked until runtime given the way format classes are specified to the job configuration. This means that a given Mapper / Reducer implementation can be used with any format of a particular "family" (i.e. Writable vs. Avro vs. etc.) although this is not strongly enforced. It seems to me that if we already have this dependency relationship that M / R implementations would, instead, be parameterized by a serialization input / output pair rather than four individual types and i/o formats would / could be parameterized with serialization types. i.e. public class MyMapper extends Mapper, WritableWriter> { public void map(AvroReader reader, Context> context) { String key = reader.getKey(); context.write( new LongWritable(Long.valueOf(key)), new Text(reader.getValue().toString()) ); } (I actually don't really like the way I'm using Context here, but you get the idea. It would be nice if the Reader / Writer thing was represented symmetrically.) This means we have a tangible single entity that encapsulates the relationship between a type and how it is serialized and allows for nicer parameterization of shared types between serialization formats. Maybe Avro{Reader,Writer} and Writable{Reader,Writer} extend or implement a common Serialization{Reader,Writer} that formats can reference and to which they can defer the process of actual serialization. This decouples formats from specific serialization schemes and makes map / reduce implementation far more explicit (as well as deals with Doug's case of a type that implements multiple serialization schemes as well as the case where a serializable type need not implement any known interface such as standard Java types). Of course, it's a huge API change, comparatively, so I don't think this does much for Owen's concerns. How best this is conveyed during Configuration is unclear to me. This is why I'm raising this on list rather than in the JIRA issue. I don't know that this solves the core concerns and could be tangential and intractable given the internals / effect on user facing APIs. Just my $0.02USD (subject to market fluctuation). Flame away. Regards. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-809-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 01 08:35:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11015 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 08:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 08:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 44590 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 08:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44259 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 08:35:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44249 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2009 08:35:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:35:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of schukanov@rbc.ru designates 80.68.240.91 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.68.240.91] (HELO hermes.hw.ru) (80.68.240.91) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:35:14 +0000 Received: from [80.68.253.76] (HELO chukanovs) by hermes.hw.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTP id 406399458 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:34:53 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?/tXLwc7P1yDzxdLHxco=?= To: Subject: FSNamesystem initialization failed. Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:34:53 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FC_01CA727A.4CEC4690" Thread-Index: AcpyYSeam8FeFz5wR+GvfHO+KeCdVw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01CA727A.4CEC4690 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_00FD_01CA727A.4CEC4690" ------=_NextPart_001_00FD_01CA727A.4CEC4690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, suddenly I've got problem with starting Namenode: [hadoop@hadoop1 hadoop]$ bin/hadoop namenode 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.19.2-dev STARTUP_MSG: build = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/bran ch-0.19 -r 755955; compiled by 'maksim07' on Sun Mar 22 14:29:37 MSK 2009 ************************************************************/ 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=NameNode, port=9000 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18:9000 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=NameNode, sessionId=null 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=hadoop,hadoop,dba 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMet rics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO common.Storage: Number of files = 30079 09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Number of files under construction = 0 09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Image file of size 4451066 loaded in 1 seconds. 09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed. java.io.IOException: Incorrect data format. logVersion is -18 but writables.length is 0. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.java: 542) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:973) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:793) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage .java:352) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.j ava:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem. java:309) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java :288) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:163 ) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:208) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java :859) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868) 09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO ipc.Server: Stopping server on 9000 09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Incorrect data f ormat. logVersion is -18 but writables.length is 0. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.java: 542) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:973) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:793) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage .java:352) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.j ava:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem. java:309) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java :288) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:163 ) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:208) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java :859) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868) 09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18 ************************************************************/ Any ideas? Thanks! ------=_NextPart_001_00FD_01CA727A.4CEC4690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, suddenly I’ve got problem with = starting Namenode:

 

[hadoop@hadoop1 hadoop]$ bin/hadoop = namenode

09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG:

/**********************************************= **************

STARTUP_MSG: Starting = NameNode

STARTUP_MSG:=9A=9A host =3D = hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18

STARTUP_MSG:=9A=9A args =3D = []

STARTUP_MSG:=9A=9A version =3D = 0.19.2-dev

STARTUP_MSG:=9A=9A build =3D http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/bran

ch-0.19 -r 755955; compiled by 'maksim07' on = Sun Mar 22 14:29:37 MSK 2009

***********************************************= *************/

09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=3DNameNode, = port=3D9000

09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: = Namenode up at: hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18:9000

09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: = Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, = sessionId=3Dnull

09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO = metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext=

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dhadoop,hadoop,dba

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO = metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMet

rics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext=

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean

09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO common.Storage: Number = of files =3D 30079

09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Number = of files under construction =3D 0

09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Image = file of size 4451066 loaded in 1 seconds.

09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed.

java.io.IOException: Incorrect data format. logVersion is -18 but writables.length is = 0.

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.ja= va:542)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:9= 73)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:7= 93)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSIm= age.java:352)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirector= y.java:87)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesyst= em.java:309)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.<init>(FSNamesy= stem.java:288)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:= 163)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.jav= a:208)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.jav= a:194)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:859)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868)

09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO ipc.Server: Stopping = server on 9000

09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Incorrect data f

ormat. logVersion is -18 but writables.length = is 0.

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.ja= va:542)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:9= 73)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:7= 93)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSIm= age.java:352)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirector= y.java:87)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesyst= em.java:309)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.<init>(FSNamesy= stem.java:288)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:= 163)

=9A =9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9Aat org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.jav= a:208)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.<init>(NameNode.jav= a:194)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:859)

=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A=9A at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868)

09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG:

/**********************************************= **************

SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at = hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18

***********************************************= *************/

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks!

 

------=_NextPart_001_00FD_01CA727A.4CEC4690-- ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01CA727A.4CEC4690 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPRTCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGKjCCBRKgAwIBAgIR AKpB7AqwvGMRYk72IFbTyEUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMDkxMTExMDAwMDAwWhcN MTAxMTExMjM1OTU5WjCB2zE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxGDAWBgNVBAMTD1NlcmdleSBDaHVrYW5vdjEfMB0GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYQc2NodWthbm92 QHJiYy5ydTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBANDwTpcVhe3t+xMpzHVvHUOh ebcMtACt/oNu0GkYpZuJ+kT9zwsbF8fGlGOX5bvF4smKI6J/ciifGjj8p/Rl6+IS0zWHAmNXPv3Z RuNLbuT5Xb741nmg5X7/LprdNeLLmomqJo3LPQgpME6qG6ro9npnPSIS80hiu4FI8npqTyZzYBQK B9SZUrXVkDkjnHlbtt0clV+/E2LhA5xCE42ljhEFK9c9EhJsIo3xrINl0cPw26kObIbmlxljSfMO 5qHzcLPG5cz1RRSHXl1woGNBfZP/7IxePj2+pC5hRTz9+VOhMlYxEtGwD4kD5unmgKWmhRQexsyi bkXK8Dn8YZWEHDsCAwEAAaOCAhIwggIOMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFImCZ33EnSZwAEu0UEh83j2uBG59 MB0GA1UdDgQWBBT/ENNZ/NAHgMOvMGYarhadXD2zDjAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADAgBgNVHSUEGTAXBggrBgEFBQcDBAYLKwYBBAGyMQEDBQIwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgUg MEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQEBMCswKQYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJl LmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMIGlBgNVHR8EgZ0wgZowTKBKoEiGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2Eu Y29tL1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwSqBIoEaG RGh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kRW1haWwuY3JsMGwGCCsGAQUFBwEBBGAwXjA2BggrBgEFBQcwAoYqaHR0cDovL2NydC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROQUFBQ2xpZW50Q0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20wGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQc2NodWthbm92QHJiYy5ydTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEA BlpMmvXGu2lQxIgsoCQKxof39m0s4oKtyDhrAijZRxFrgcF+e7SFqqHiLMYdSvolF462oB37lHu0 KYzuQ2xftB8Mt+Ve0KAMNUksnC0VizcAWBjuo1FLmtwRPVBmvrX3wtrHdW4y1CP+FFMJa/j2XGtN NE91ymab0XjENjCKR/E2iGSdS9cP/SSnsKD7KhW9O5yqu8qHbLZ8SMOYdnK5FuQdlbYNu5Utm+zj WJuH6n/MFecuzi00VcELkK/HhL7YcGkR8bfWwEduHxJwINnhtcacxDl6M+lTVquc0n4rUjKwtT68 MxKc1c036Muwr5GWHZLB5ytdOMtuQJlbNI0v5zGCBGgwggRkAgEBMIHEMIGuMQswCQYDVQQGEwJV UzELMAkGA1UECBMCVVQxFzAVBgNVBAcTDlNhbHQgTGFrZSBDaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQKExVUaGUgVVNF UlRSVVNUIE5ldHdvcmsxITAfBgNVBAsTGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbTE2MDQGA1UE AxMtVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIEVtYWlsAhEAqkHsCrC8 YxFiTvYgVtPIRTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICeDAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wOTEyMDEwODM0NTNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRZ5Png6bSSmkao+dQNEDEv cDrjtjBnBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xWjBYMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG 9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAHBgUrDgMCGjAKBggqhkiG9w0CBTCB1QYJ KwYBBAGCNxAEMYHHMIHEMIGuMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkGA1UECBMCVVQxFzAVBgNVBAcTDlNh bHQgTGFrZSBDaXR5MR4wHAYDVQQKExVUaGUgVVNFUlRSVVNUIE5ldHdvcmsxITAfBgNVBAsTGGh0 dHA6Ly93d3cudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbTE2MDQGA1UEAxMtVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnQgQXV0 aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIEVtYWlsAhEAqkHsCrC8YxFiTvYgVtPIRTCB1wYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsx gceggcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENp dHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51 c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv biBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQCqQewKsLxjEWJO9iBW08hFMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAMiOZKXBaUMT AieGJp5Fk/efh2NFF9pkqTHIrLIBRyh6qK7HNZbRDpB6+q5RGhPpz9hkeQ/Y2VsyEz4WnJiBIMfG 9UMNBbt1cO8rHpCZqpW7GZCU6LuAjfJtNZSL/x7mdxVRNoI0l3Ma3Qq8ly2DWpPSr1V1LKfAN8TR 7mw2Jev6v03WyOeHOouObGvFSDuu3idpTHjQRw+IXgvPK0Sxno6tjiUFYO6/aPMQy2Jj2k9GkoFq yePT7NDTdljqXL9Xa3A5L3sCoQ71phfzLFilR4UsEeEvXv4Kybmt8oW0SIdSUIWHiXSyAjJxdHoo pEfEOoUx3oawmE0QD2l7+wTBPkYAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_00FC_01CA727A.4CEC4690-- From general-return-810-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 01 18:38:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65169 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 18:38:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 18:38:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 29133 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 18:38:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29033 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 18:38:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29023 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2009 18:38:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:38:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of benjamin.cotton@lehman.com does not designate 69.147.102.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.147.102.67] (HELO smtp104.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.102.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:38:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 43181 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 18:37:44 -0000 Received: from dsl027-139-111.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net (benjamin.cotton@216.27.139.111 with plain) by smtp104.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Dec 2009 10:37:44 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: Fl3kciCswBCpO0rt4AQpoUBtfUKa8rc- X-YMail-OSG: Gbb1JfUVM1nNhYqOKhZGigbka_fWHJnpIJUxXkT9eZK0g5XAiX2dmQsC4hKvlXJPkeXjebMnhTxPZWemVNQM0K2MpSZYD8fxpF1xet8G_QcfkiNi14U5tgKMy8szqaPKjXvqLjgDjGJuvGU4HQVjQ8pv0JjRfnWEIO25i1RNciCNsU5PsZk1X2nA7_AIs9ORDTWgkeA6GI3Pah1JrsBiIin.0GKOMQrSnTmAOX8JVAzQInisZREEzeIil.NgwoirS8O1D8SYrf.6yRriZ71VIXCaEKB2gBQLmfbaa8Nb4YBYQrk7wh9IhR8uJucAJHiHmzC48PuG7WNr07.vUj9xIEUYQUruP4mmRlHEZ7ON21kb1C4l7gxxhWXbUW.pVdvbddpkrk1cOVGJdLnrc.d_2yQRAzIWjp1DJdoqwfSM2Xr1_jEfwLKw.5Y- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4B156277.20404@lehman.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:37:43 -0500 From: "ben.cotton@lehman.com" Reply-To: ben.cotton@lehman.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: How to configure read/write/execute ACLs ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040007070207050107020904" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------040007070207050107020904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How do I configure Hadoop ACLs to specify a uid's read/write/execute privileges? --------------040007070207050107020904-- From general-return-811-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 01 18:51:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69310 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 18:51:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 18:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 59500 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 18:51:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59402 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 18:51:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59392 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2009 18:51:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:51:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:51:31 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so4069578pxi.2 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:51:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.6 with SMTP id u6mr699636wfh.181.1259693469304; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:51:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70912011050r79e9c494j6eb8c8f05ae09b09@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: FSNamesystem initialization failed. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c5fcc386ac0479af3dc9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502c5fcc386ac0479af3dc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sergey, I replied to your post in common-user - please don't double-post in the future - just makes the threads harder to follow for others who might have the same problem. Thanks -Todd 2009/12/1 =D0=A7=D1=83=D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2 =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0= =B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 > Hi, suddenly I=E2=80=99ve got problem with starting Namenode: > > > > [hadoop@hadoop1 hadoop]$ bin/hadoop namenode > > 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > > /************************************************************ > > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18 > > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.19.2-dev > > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/bran > > ch-0.19 -r 755955; compiled by 'maksim07' on Sun Mar 22 14:29:37 MSK 2009 > > ************************************************************/ > > 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with > hostName=3DNameNode, port=3D9000 > > 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: > hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18:9000 > > 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with > processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull > > 09/12/01 11:26:51 INFO metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing > NameNodeMeterics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dhadoop,hadoop,dba > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing > FSNamesystemMet > > rics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered > FSNamesystemStatusMBean > > 09/12/01 11:26:52 INFO common.Storage: Number of files =3D 30079 > > 09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Number of files under construction= =3D > 0 > > 09/12/01 11:26:53 INFO common.Storage: Image file of size 4451066 loaded = in > 1 seconds. > > 09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initializatio= n > failed. > > java.io.IOException: Incorrect data format. logVersion is -18 but > writables.length is 0. > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.ja= va:542) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:9= 73) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:7= 93) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSIm= age.java:352) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirector= y.java:87) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesyst= em.java:309) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.j= ava:288) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:= 163) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:208) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:194) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:859) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868) > > 09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO ipc.Server: Stopping server on 9000 > > 09/12/01 11:27:11 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Incorrect > data f > > ormat. logVersion is -18 but writables.length is 0. > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.ja= va:542) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:9= 73) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:7= 93) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSIm= age.java:352) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirector= y.java:87) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesyst= em.java:309) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.j= ava:288) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:= 163) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:208) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:194) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:859) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868) > > 09/12/01 11:27:11 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > /************************************************************ > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at hadoop1.bcr.ru/81.68.243.18 > > ************************************************************/ > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks! > > > --00504502c5fcc386ac0479af3dc9-- From general-return-812-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 01 22:18:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45864 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 22:18:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 22:18:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 65815 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 22:18:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65733 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 22:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65723 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2009 22:18:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:18:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:18:14 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=V7wYNfPa7Ac44pM4qFdF52X1rdVj/QpbIjOmBFhWHdU1nLg0u7RH8cvr M3mrBXPA7ft8ATSp4PtG6FYrsw20VoWc5Zq0au/W8/zYvhxs0DUblweun 67ACZYqRlI8T06x; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1259705894; x=1291241894; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20How=20to=20configure=20read/write/execu te=20ACLs=20?|Date:=20Tue,=2001=20Dec=202009=2014:17:40 =20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=20 1.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<4B1 56277.20404@lehman.com>; bh=NEQd0SClfNXJIqqqvksTd6Rz+SpmTyXpG1t1ZhKBkfs=; b=ZYmaHMuPzfkxVoh9oEYsZSRywqITfUFAAZE0Yr+WCl1ENdS3S+11z99Z 46Ar63A0GWbk9ofjEH+A8ApGdKj42dUWZNE9by4vGk0bnJeGgo7Ehprva ch/8CkEWjHnzv9J; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,323,1257148800"; d="scan'208";a="9759504" Received: from 172.16.19.135 ([172.16.19.135]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:17:43 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:40 -0800 Subject: Re: How to configure read/write/execute ACLs ? From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to configure read/write/execute ACLs ? Thread-Index: Acpy1BhP+rsxKr0PR0e+1vtdldXPfg== In-Reply-To: <4B156277.20404@lehman.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/1/09 10:37 AM, "ben.cotton@lehman.com" wrote: > How do I configure Hadoop ACLs to specify a uid's read/write/execute > privileges? If I parse your question correctly, you want to limit certain uids to have only be able to read or write certain data? That functionality doesn't exist. The permission system is mainly to prevent accidents; it is not real security. [Uids are trivial to forge. See my "Hadoop 24/7" slide deck from Apachecon EU for more on Hadoop's busted security model.] From general-return-813-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 01 23:14:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66068 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2009 23:14:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2009 23:14:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 38254 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 23:14:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38169 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2009 23:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38159 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2009 23:14:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:14:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vogt7@llnl.gov designates 128.115.41.81 as permitted sender) Received: from [128.115.41.81] (HELO nspiron-1.llnl.gov) (128.115.41.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:14:43 +0000 X-Attachments: None Received: from poisonivy.llnl.gov (HELO [128.115.210.109]) ([128.115.210.109]) by nspiron-1.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2009 15:14:22 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:14:22 -0800 Subject: Re: Scribe vs. Chukwa From: Kim Vogt To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Scribe vs. Chukwa Thread-Index: Acpx9u50+HtKxaEtHUuAzUfAGnnRsgAEPdkXADUHjZE= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, Thanks for the info. It doesn't look like Scribe comes with a log file viewer, but I could be wrong? I'm attempting to install Scribe now, and hopefully if I have time, do the same with Chukwa to get a better feel for both. I'm interested in checking out the reporting tools Chukwa offers. -Kim On 11/30/09 1:55 PM, "Eric Yang" wrote: > Hi Kim, >=20 > Scribe works well for simple deployment. The complexity increases when > "central scribe server" is multi-machines deployment. Basically, it > requires a reverse proxy to load balance the data collection. ( > http://*www.*cloudera.com/blog/2008/11/02/configuring-and-using-scribe-fo= r-had > oop-log-collection/ ) I have not used scribe personally, therefore someo= ne > else could fill in the experience. >=20 > Chukwa was designed to be fault tolerant log collection/analytics platfor= m. > Each chukwa agent automatically creates it's own routing table to chukwa > collectors. Therefore, Chukwa does not require a reverse proxy. However= , > Chukwa Agent requires knowledge of all collector addresses, hence the > initial deployment complexity may be a little higher than scribe. The > largest test for Chukwa deployment was 50 Chukwa collectors running on to= p > of 100 dedicated hadoop nodes to process log files from a data center. > (Which was decommissioned due to lack of log files) Base on my experienc= e, > a single collector with 8GB allocated RAM could handle all log files from > 2000 hadoop nodes + System Metrics (top, df, sar, iostat, netstat, vmstat > output). =20 >=20 > Chukwa does not have a direct log file viewer, instead, it has an analyti= cs > engine which computes various facts and provide reports. There are frequ= ent > requests about log file viewer but it hasn't been implemented. We only h= ave > command line utility to dump the log files because it is difficult to vie= w > terabytes of log file. At some point in the future, when a full body ind= ex > engine is implemented, then we will provide log file search. >=20 > In essence, it depends on what you are looking for. If you are looking f= or > simple log collection and viewer, Scribe is probably a good tool. If you > are looking for log collection and reporting platform, Chukwa is a good > solution. >=20 > Regards, > Eric >=20 > On 11/30/09 11:54 AM, "Kim Vogt" wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> My team is looking into using Scribe or Chukwa for hadoop log collection= . I >> was wondering if anyone had any opinions about one vs. the other? I >> apologize if this topic was covered before, but I don=B9t see a link to th= e >> archives for this mailing list. >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Kim >=20 >=20 From general-return-814-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 02 07:40:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12345 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 07:40:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 07:40:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 81370 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 07:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81283 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 07:40:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81273 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 07:40:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.24] (HELO QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:40:14 +0000 Received: from OMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.12]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id C7Pi1d0060FhH24A27fvXz; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:39:55 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by OMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id C7fu1d0011GAoR68U7fu4k; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:39:54 +0000 Message-Id: <57989512-60C3-4AD7-8AD5-3A3F0DCD4F91@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Introducing Cloud MapReduce Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:39:52 -0800 References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > 1) It is faster than other implementations (e.g., 60 times faster than > Hadoop in one case. Speedup depends on the application and data.). Based on your report, it looks like your comparison was done using 1.2GB of data in 92,000 files. If you took the default configuration, you'll end up with 92,000 maps, each of them processing a very small input. You either need to use MultiFileInputFormat or use Hadoop Archives to bundle your tiny files into reasonable size. For input data that small you should not have more than 8 maps unless each map is doing a lot of CPU work. In your reduce push iterator model, you give up a lot of determinism in your application. Many applications that run in Hadoop depend on the reduces getting keys in sorted order. Getting keys in a random order won't work. Furthermore, I don't see any way that you can scale up your approach. You effectively need to hold open all of the reduce states for the keys you've seen and can't close them until it is done. Again, that will quickly exhaust memory. So the push model will work for something like word count, but fail on large problems. When you add types in, you should add them in as: K1, V1 -> map -> K2,V2 -> reduce -> K3,V3 with the combiner taking: K2,V2 -> combiner -> K2,V2 Of course the types are often not primitives and using something like Avro is a good thing. -- Owen From general-return-815-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 02 08:46:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27363 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 08:46:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 08:46:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60488 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 08:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60407 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 08:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60397 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 08:46:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:09 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4306411pzk.2 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:45:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Fz+x9Erk0PtJEnepfHCb8q9QE87/eXpNMD+IzOin/HY=; b=wBxrKJ41xA6o0nkY+VdVvfGkwjsW7I8ioAVhqKzN/nccgfVDdFHyANZO9kRRiFuYT4 3g5k+r/MTmSFUTW/ax7RAOW0h6jNVJbWW8LAvjWOLgAwCqP1sIVj0ipOGGW7abROb5eW cx2AX+vTIMV7xxoszY0LWQ5hjYbQRfCZZI/ZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QCLsAIBsfjs8nUDLM7JnOvt185edwttu2US8nG/LlELyfXroL3qSNXXA/9Qr0H7Kfo EKbLs1/rFtVYNoTCLaSXcfr5IV3hF4T6oy7bftYdz6DISlQ9oHg4dwuDXBEA+yIN1c+M 2WsxstCa3tk9g+7LqvJR0usr+4OiiFpeEHtbQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr407624rve.239.1259743549720; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:45:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:45:49 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af20912020045q72334148qeeee55e601961343@mail.gmail.com> Subject: What if I want do random write in Hadoop? From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FSDataInputStream is seekable, but FSDataOutputStream is not? Why? What are the difficulties to support random write? Thanks! Xiao From general-return-816-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 02 09:48:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53614 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 09:48:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 09:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 61414 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 09:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61332 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 09:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61321 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 09:48:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:48:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.174] (HELO mail-vw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.212.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:48:12 +0000 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so5722vws.2 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u1BLMQ+WDVLc+68jkh3c8OM8ShtAoATtdxneNBUnpls=; b=jEJf/03WHa+epXFOK0WcStSI+9n0nafZrFhiEaK7JmkilR2THocvDVwIYMiFV28Clx f3sWHcexaelT59ayJpoNFLZQy0C0rjA8O3BwfqLLPy8nE7XGtVW/bZP9xPbYPqAatsiL 3mDNE6J13jsqAitFX9cfVclZLT0p+XSXeb/nU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jXQhUXIrlAuQfn3MDvRdOavcemVPErZ2QhqNtf485G9meIQ3rfR8hd3Z3VodWhqx5X F9wKK1NS4tFnHsL730v6N+9YTeJozSVOYixSP7XJEOKe7EU6Rc4ajggxyZ5TiS/pYr4u hdOoNOQMzkuMQlRql6neqcGPfPtYnoJhDz0iw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.127.36 with SMTP id e36mr8518749vcs.4.1259747271883; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:47:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5a921af20912020045q72334148qeeee55e601961343@mail.gmail.com> References: <5a921af20912020045q72334148qeeee55e601961343@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:47:51 +0100 Message-ID: <88f6e29a0912020147med0be70ka7ecd1c242d5bc86@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: What if I want do random write in Hadoop? From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 09:45, xiao yang wrote: > FSDataInputStream is seekable, but FSDataOutputStream is not? > Why? What are the difficulties to support random write? From http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/hdfs_design.html#Assumptions+and+Goals >>>> Simple Coherency Model HDFS applications need a write-once-read-many access model for files. A file once created, written, and closed need not be changed. This assumption simplifies data coherency issues and enables high throughput data access. A Map/Reduce application or a web crawler application fits perfectly with this model. There is a plan to support appending-writes to files in the future. <<<< Data in HDFS is replicated (potentially across data center boundaries). While changing a file, old copies of the data remain. This results in consistency problems when massively reading in parallel, one of the strength of HDFS. To avoid these complications, changing written data is not possible. Other distributed systems, like for example Apache CouchDB, have different consistency models. Bernd From general-return-817-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 02 13:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15007 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 13:07:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 13:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 3738 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 13:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3636 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 13:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3625 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 13:07:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:07:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:06:52 +0000 Received: by pwi19 with SMTP id 19so110610pwi.29 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:06:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=iEhnjiaEOSK4Z3uOOfYjCyH55uuifYeDDhnBoNsbp8g=; b=mOvb1UqMb8r+FIi/iC8gocVb5+xYaR2hzuMNDfWwHRHTRRZq60naaOHfMmjmfc3r+t LNsTCdNn0X6y5KjXQjethF6uvHe6jQboXccXmeMT0A6X8p5XNHWIucoyHkfc84iCZ/4g 7sjlZz1K8k+8LF9ugv0iiuXQ6vOhRNCfHq5gQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DDunLjjKxP4Q099AQQ1MT8kbgpVLtEH0GxnMrm3PxtG/XkMr6h2IivE0SZqTA8Zfk9 Q1GVQxN2sGINd0gUlqdgxKO83X2pa0HNZD73XubuhdWRpoiC5/+9BEvBQ3k74XbsWPhi JTC/06tlWHqL54tPW4/jQeOhrYwpoDXjCdWo0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.137.2 with SMTP id p2mr8404wfn.136.1259759191351; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:06:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:06:31 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350912020506q49c66b0brf459a875df3a21a1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: help needed: mapred Taskrunner(hadoop 0.20.1) was marked as successful but with commuication error at random From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4ce921a63880479be8b03 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd4ce921a63880479be8b03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It occures in our hadoop cluster)(0.20.1 version) from time to time(the log is below). Anyone could help? what hadoop is doing in the course of(after) committing before the map task is done? joWhat kind of reasons could make communication error. The job is still regarded as succeed even with this communication error. Thanks for the help. 2009-11-25 01:21:30,476 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:30,541 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=MAP, sessionId= 2009-11-25 01:21:30,559 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. ... 2009-11-25 01:21:31,616 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 27 2009-11-25 01:21:31,624 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:31,627 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 2009-11-25 01:21:31,799 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 2009-11-25 01:21:31,799 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 2009-11-25 01:21:33,266 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output 2009-11-25 01:21:33,277 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:37,187 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: Finished spill 0 2009-11-25 01:21:37,236 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:37,271 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Task:attempt_200911171829_0181_m_000008_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting 2009-11-25 01:22:37,323 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Communication exception: java.io.IOException: Call to /127.0.0.1:53674failed on local exception: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.$Proxy0.statusUpdate(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$TaskReporter.run(Task.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:184) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.write(SocketChannelImpl.java:341) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream$Writer.performIO(SocketOutputStream.java:55) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:142) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:146) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:107) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:65) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:123) at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.sendParam(Client.java:480) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) ... 4 more 2009-11-25 01:22:37,338 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Task 'attempt_200911171829_0181_m_000008_0' done. --000e0cd4ce921a63880479be8b03-- From general-return-818-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 02 14:47:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60157 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 14:47:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2009 14:47:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 28452 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 14:47:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28381 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2009 14:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28371 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2009 14:47:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:47:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of benjamin.cotton@lehman.com does not designate 69.147.102.75 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.147.102.75] (HELO smtp112.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.102.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:47:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 25639 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2009 14:47:22 -0000 Received: from dsl027-139-111.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net (benjamin.cotton@216.27.139.111 with plain) by smtp112.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 Dec 2009 06:47:21 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: Fl3kciCswBCpO0rt4AQpoUBtfUKa8rc- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4B167DF8.6090800@lehman.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:47:20 -0500 From: "ben.cotton@lehman.com" Reply-To: ben.cotton@lehman.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: How to configure read/write/execute ACLs ? References: <4D22359F6247DA4D8672EDA1CC864E6C6B521B@dnpcor1exum001.aur.alservices.com> In-Reply-To: <4D22359F6247DA4D8672EDA1CC864E6C6B521B@dnpcor1exum001.aur.alservices.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010006020004060609020704" --------------010006020004060609020704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for this response, and the reference to your ApacheCon presentation on Hadoop Security (lack of). It would seem that the conventions being used in conf/hadoop-policy.xml might be a basis to provide a user/role level ACL capability in Hadoop. In the meantime, we will follow your suggested strategy to provision users only on grids with data they can use. > >> How do I configure Hadoop ACLs to specify a uid's read/write/execute >> privileges? >> > > If I parse your question correctly, you want to limit certain uids to > have only be able to read or write certain data? That functionality doesn't exist. The permission system is mainly to prevent accidents; it is not real security. [Uids are trivial to forge. See my "Hadoop 24/7" slide deck from Apachecon EU for more on Hadoop's busted security model.] > > > --------------010006020004060609020704-- From general-return-819-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 03 17:41:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92635 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 17:41:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 17:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27842 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 17:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27775 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 17:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27765 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 17:41:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.71 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.71] (HELO amrmr1002.accenture.com) (170.252.248.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:41:28 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1003.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.63]) by amrmr1002.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB3Hex5s018431 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:41:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3001.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.23]) by AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:40:21 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.14]) by AMRXH3001.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.23]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:40:21 -0500 From: To: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:39:41 -0500 Subject: RE: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? Thread-Topic: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? thread-index: Acpx2TCCt6fgMYqwSBaHD9D34V0K+ACZOx1A Message-ID: References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911300815q2e86c64r92e28654af38840d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45f85f70911300815q2e86c64r92e28654af38840d@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {4102CD52-8C8F-484B-8B0C-9AE980C13122} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BTyG B4EY CQkL CQsI C5d3 DJfi DX9a Em1C FUD9 FVOi F7y5 Ger/ Gew0 H/0F IKdM IvOJ;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{4102CD52-8C8F-484B-8B0C-9AE980C13122};aAB1AGEAbgAuAGwAaQB1AEAAYQBjAGMAZQBuAHQAdQByAGUALgBjAG8AbQA=;Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:39:41 GMT;UgBFADoAIAB3AGgAYQB0ACAAaQBzACAAdABoAGUAIABtAGEAagBvAHIAIABkAGkAZgBmAGUAcgBlAG4AYwBlACAAYgBlAHQAdwBlAGUAbgAgAEgAYQBkAG8AbwBwACAAYQBuAGQAIABjAGwAbwB1AGQATQBhAHAAUgBlAGQAdQBjAGUAPwA= acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: 6Fmx78oxJnUgeanTthCC0Q== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2009 17:40:21.0466 (UTC) FILETIME=[AFCC8BA0:01CA743F] > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:15 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > cloudMapReduce? >=20 > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:48 AM, wrote: >=20 > > Todd, > > > > We do not keep all values for a key in memory. Instead, we only keep > the > > partial reduce result in memory, but throw away the value as soon as > it is > > used. The point you raised is still very valid if the reduce state > > maintained per key is large, which I hope is a very rare case. If = you > have > > some concrete workload examples, it will help us prioritize the > development > > effort. I can definitely see the benefits of introducing a paging > mechanism > > to spill partial reduce results to the output SQS queue in the = future. > > Thanks. > > >=20 > Hi Huan, >=20 > I guess I misremembered or misread the paper. >=20 > Given this technique, doesn't it mean that reducers can only work when > commutative and associative? >=20 > -Todd Todd,=20 I do not see how it is different from Hadoop's iterator interface, = unless the reduce function relies on the fact that the values are sorted = in a particular order when fed by the iterator one at a time.=20 If there is no assumption on the value ordering, or the ordering = expected is different from what the iterator presents, the reduce = function has to read in all values from the iterator first (page to disk = if necessary), rearrange them as necessary, then process based on that = new ordering. This will be the same as what we will do in our iterator = interface. In the next() function, our reduce function can read in all = values from the iterator (page to disk if necessary), then in the = finish() function, our reduce function rearranges the ordering and = process based on the new ordering.=20 Apologies for the late reply. Traveling in china with no reliable = network connection this week. Thanks. -Huan This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-820-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 03 17:46:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97563 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 17:46:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 17:46:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 36430 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 17:46:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36347 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 17:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36337 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 17:46:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:46:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.204] (HELO mail-pz0-f204.google.com) (209.85.222.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:46:02 +0000 Received: by pzk42 with SMTP id 42so1623843pzk.31 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:45:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.20 with SMTP id d20mr209492wfa.322.1259862340165; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:45:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911300815q2e86c64r92e28654af38840d@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:45:20 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70912030945r9613e95p26832cab954e7300@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450296254062460479d68fd4 --0050450296254062460479d68fd4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:15 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > > cloudMapReduce? > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:48 AM, wrote: > > > > > Todd, > > > > > > We do not keep all values for a key in memory. Instead, we only keep > > the > > > partial reduce result in memory, but throw away the value as soon as > > it is > > > used. The point you raised is still very valid if the reduce state > > > maintained per key is large, which I hope is a very rare case. If you > > have > > > some concrete workload examples, it will help us prioritize the > > development > > > effort. I can definitely see the benefits of introducing a paging > > mechanism > > > to spill partial reduce results to the output SQS queue in the future. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > Hi Huan, > > > > I guess I misremembered or misread the paper. > > > > Given this technique, doesn't it mean that reducers can only work when > > commutative and associative? > > > > -Todd > > Todd, > > I do not see how it is different from Hadoop's iterator interface, unless > the reduce function relies on the fact that the values are sorted in a > particular order when fed by the iterator one at a time. > > If there is no assumption on the value ordering, or the ordering expected > is different from what the iterator presents, the reduce function has to > read in all values from the iterator first (page to disk if necessary), > rearrange them as necessary, then process based on that new ordering. This > will be the same as what we will do in our iterator interface. In the next() > function, our reduce function can read in all values from the iterator (page > to disk if necessary), then in the finish() function, our reduce function > rearranges the ordering and process based on the new ordering. > > If you want sorted values, you can get that in Hadoop, though it's not on by default. Also, the reducer only needs to keep all the values for a single key in RAM in this case. In your case, since the keys come in any order, the reducer would have to keep all the values for every key in that partition in RAM. I guess you're suggesting that you could have enough partitions that "every key in that partition" is only one or two, but for large datasets this just doesn't soudn feasible (can you get millions of SQS queues?) Sure, you can implement your own paging to disk, and then an external sort, and then read them back in the more convenient sorted order. But then you're just implementing what Hadoop already does for you :) -Todd > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the > original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > --0050450296254062460479d68fd4-- From general-return-821-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 03 18:00:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6876 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 18:00:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 18:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 64054 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 18:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63994 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 18:00:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63984 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 18:00:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:00:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.70 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.70] (HELO amrmr1001.accenture.com) (170.252.248.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:00:17 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1001.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1001.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.61]) by amrmr1001.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB3HxdCv019254 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:59:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3004.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.26]) by AMRXV1001.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:59:45 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.14]) by AMRXH3004.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.26]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:59:45 -0500 From: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 To: Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:59:09 -0500 Subject: RE: Introducing Cloud MapReduce Thread-Topic: Introducing Cloud MapReduce thread-index: AcpzIrYNIrY9CQ7MSD+m/y/SKs8qdABHSygQ Message-ID: References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> <57989512-60C3-4AD7-8AD5-3A3F0DCD4F91@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <57989512-60C3-4AD7-8AD5-3A3F0DCD4F91@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: 8lW225mj7W/AjgdadZmXTg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2009 17:59:45.0801 (UTC) FILETIME=[65CBF790:01CA7442] Owen,=20 Great questions. You are hitting some key points, answers are inline. > > 1) It is faster than other implementations (e.g., 60 times faster > than > > Hadoop in one case. Speedup depends on the application and data.). >=20 > Based on your report, it looks like your comparison was done using > 1.2GB of data in 92,000 files. If you took the default configuration, > you'll end up with 92,000 maps, each of them processing a very small > input. You either need to use MultiFileInputFormat or use Hadoop > Archives to bundle your tiny files into reasonable size. For input > data that small you should not have more than 8 maps unless each map > is doing a lot of CPU work. We used default because we were not sure how to optimize it. We can = certainly rerun the test with your suggestion. The point is not about = the 60x speedup, it is about a potential bottleneck in the master/slave = architecture. When you scale up the number of slaves nodes and the = number of tasks, you will run into the same problem even if you use = larger chunk size. Due to the lack of access to a large cluster, we are = not able to run an experiment to show that the master node will choke at = some point. This is essentially a scaled-down version of the same = large-scale test. > In your reduce push iterator model, you give up a lot of determinism > in your application. Many applications that run in Hadoop depend on > the reduces getting keys in sorted order. Getting keys in a random > order won't work.=20 Sorting at the end after the values have been reduced is much cheaper = than sorting the whole set of intermediate key-value pairs. We will add = a function in our implementation to sort at the end, for those = applications requiring ordered output.=20 > Furthermore, I don't see any way that you can scale > up your approach. You effectively need to hold open all of the reduce > states for the keys you've seen and can't close them until it is done. > Again, that will quickly exhaust memory. So the push model will work > for something like word count, but fail on large problems. Our strategy is to have a large number of partitions to limit the number = of keys in each partition. Having a large number of partitions would not = overload our system, so it is easy for us. As I expressed in a related = thread answering Todd's question, I believe the state each key holds is = small for most applications. Loved to be proved wrong, so that we have = real motivations to refine the architecture to handle that case. > When you add types in, you should add them in as: >=20 > K1, V1 -> map -> K2,V2 -> reduce -> K3,V3 >=20 > with the combiner taking: >=20 > K2,V2 -> combiner -> K2,V2 >=20 > Of course the types are often not primitives and using something like > Avro is a good thing. Thanks for clarifying. Adding types is in the roadmap now.=20 Regards. -Huan This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-822-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 03 19:29:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86089 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2009 19:29:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2009 19:29:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 86793 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 19:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86033 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2009 19:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85640 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2009 19:29:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:29:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:29:23 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so1486227gxk.9 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:29:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GaxEhyVsjZBHAkAM1HOIH66CcjsKkZujpNE1LwbpqAM=; b=g6x22rMcUufIVA9QmyIn6sC4XNg26uO8Q06gfPCj6ryBcvmDno4wQG5Hy754mYM/6q 88D7/dIhvIJonjKfnidAWqaMgIOtx526tbTsqlj5Ek2PMoPpxl6oW8lMvvlhKHocOW/a UfXvpBBaHyQBg4aBhXpHIN1sOFWzB5w+KM5n4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=QWnZJi7YQsNzoJiCSLGUSoolgtMgcDg3GR3FnHHBk7Fl4tDbTtbJH55GlOEwyGG9vM nRp1nDpXHUuMevm7x4t3iRq+jk3AAI/IF6tQHVKYgI2IhH0jTgJgwRcsEoIM4uYfPqoZ xraFvHinxuxwCh/PsIwMRGzzMizTP9Z2gRMUg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.29.20 with SMTP id g20mr3582522ybj.189.1259868542163; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:29:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> <57989512-60C3-4AD7-8AD5-3A3F0DCD4F91@apache.org> From: goutham patnaik Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:28:42 -0800 Message-ID: <1b3669280912031128i273a3ee5p6f4ccfd793f60e2a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Introducing Cloud MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd23bb8eb5c310479d80064 --000e0cd23bb8eb5c310479d80064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 see inline On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:59 AM, wrote: > Owen, > > Great questions. You are hitting some key points, answers are inline. > > > > 1) It is faster than other implementations (e.g., 60 times faster > > than > > > Hadoop in one case. Speedup depends on the application and data.). > > > > Based on your report, it looks like your comparison was done using > > 1.2GB of data in 92,000 files. If you took the default configuration, > > you'll end up with 92,000 maps, each of them processing a very small > > input. You either need to use MultiFileInputFormat or use Hadoop > > Archives to bundle your tiny files into reasonable size. For input > > data that small you should not have more than 8 maps unless each map > > is doing a lot of CPU work. > > We used default because we were not sure how to optimize it. We can > certainly rerun the test with your suggestion. The point is not about the > 60x speedup, it is about a potential bottleneck in the master/slave > architecture. When you scale up the number of slaves nodes and the number of > tasks, you will run into the same problem even if you use larger chunk size. > Due to the lack of access to a large cluster, we are not able to run an > experiment to show that the master node will choke at some point. This is > essentially a scaled-down version of the same large-scale test. > > > In your reduce push iterator model, you give up a lot of determinism > > in your application. Many applications that run in Hadoop depend on > > the reduces getting keys in sorted order. Getting keys in a random > > order won't work. > > Sorting at the end after the values have been reduced is much cheaper than > sorting the whole set of intermediate key-value pairs. We will add a > function in our implementation to sort at the end, for those applications > requiring ordered output. > Owen is right though - there are some applications that require the keys to be sorted when they reach a reducer - secondary sorting is one such example > > > Furthermore, I don't see any way that you can scale > > up your approach. You effectively need to hold open all of the reduce > > states for the keys you've seen and can't close them until it is done. > > Again, that will quickly exhaust memory. So the push model will work > > for something like word count, but fail on large problems. > > Our strategy is to have a large number of partitions to limit the number of > keys in each partition. Having a large number of partitions would not > overload our system, so it is easy for us. As I expressed in a related > thread answering Todd's question, I believe the state each key holds is > small for most applications. Loved to be proved wrong, so that we have real > motivations to refine the architecture to handle that case. > > > When you add types in, you should add them in as: > > > > K1, V1 -> map -> K2,V2 -> reduce -> K3,V3 > > > > with the combiner taking: > > > > K2,V2 -> combiner -> K2,V2 > > > > Of course the types are often not primitives and using something like > > Avro is a good thing. > > Thanks for clarifying. Adding types is in the roadmap now. > > Regards. > > -Huan > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the > original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > --000e0cd23bb8eb5c310479d80064-- From general-return-823-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 04 01:21:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28897 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 01:21:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 01:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 87883 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 01:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87704 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 01:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87694 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 01:21:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.72] (HELO amrmr1003.accenture.com) (170.252.248.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:21:32 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1003.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.63]) by amrmr1003.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB41L9dX027356 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:21:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3001.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.23]) by AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:20:33 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.14]) by AMRXH3001.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.23]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:20:33 -0500 From: To: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:19:54 -0500 Subject: RE: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? Thread-Topic: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? thread-index: Acp0QIQp2KJG00HnR3q82VQWCh9lYAAPmlMA Message-ID: References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911300815q2e86c64r92e28654af38840d@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912030945r9613e95p26832cab954e7300@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45f85f70912030945r9613e95p26832cab954e7300@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {53011AAE-0023-42F9-BD79-04951CEB315C} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BW+d Bibm BzWt CPDH Chr5 FTsR FUU2 FVBu FViZ Fvei IDiP I/Ol JDmw Jzjb KjFq KsPH;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{53011AAE-0023-42F9-BD79-04951CEB315C};aAB1AGEAbgAuAGwAaQB1AEAAYQBjAGMAZQBuAHQAdQByAGUALgBjAG8AbQA=;Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:19:54 GMT;UgBFADoAIAB3AGgAYQB0ACAAaQBzACAAdABoAGUAIABtAGEAagBvAHIAIABkAGkAZgBmAGUAcgBlAG4AYwBlACAAYgBlAHQAdwBlAGUAbgAgAEgAYQBkAG8AbwBwACAAYQBuAGQAIABjAGwAbwB1AGQATQBhAHAAUgBlAGQAdQBjAGUAPwA= acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: TVunI3HmpiPt4bm1WpVhxA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2009 01:20:33.0300 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9BC0D40:01CA747F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd, Yes, the difference is that, if special ordering is required, we hold a = few keys' worth of values in memory v.s. Hadoop holding one key's worth = of values.=20 SQS has no limit on the number of queues you can create and the number = of messages you can put in a queue. In practice, we have run an = experiment in which we created 4,000 queues with 100 threads, and it = finished successfully in a few seconds. Have not tried to stress test to = millions of queues though. But even if the test fails with millions of = queues, it will be a bug with SQS to be fixed since Amazon advertises = that there is no limit. Thanks. -Huan > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:45 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > cloudMapReduce? >=20 > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, wrote: >=20 > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:15 AM > > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > > > cloudMapReduce? > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:48 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > Todd, > > > > > > > > We do not keep all values for a key in memory. Instead, we only > keep > > > the > > > > partial reduce result in memory, but throw away the value as = soon > as > > > it is > > > > used. The point you raised is still very valid if the reduce > state > > > > maintained per key is large, which I hope is a very rare case. = If > you > > > have > > > > some concrete workload examples, it will help us prioritize the > > > development > > > > effort. I can definitely see the benefits of introducing a = paging > > > mechanism > > > > to spill partial reduce results to the output SQS queue in the > future. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Huan, > > > > > > I guess I misremembered or misread the paper. > > > > > > Given this technique, doesn't it mean that reducers can only work > when > > > commutative and associative? > > > > > > -Todd > > > > Todd, > > > > I do not see how it is different from Hadoop's iterator interface, > unless > > the reduce function relies on the fact that the values are sorted in > a > > particular order when fed by the iterator one at a time. > > > > If there is no assumption on the value ordering, or the ordering > expected > > is different from what the iterator presents, the reduce function = has > to > > read in all values from the iterator first (page to disk if > necessary), > > rearrange them as necessary, then process based on that new = ordering. > This > > will be the same as what we will do in our iterator interface. In = the > next() > > function, our reduce function can read in all values from the > iterator (page > > to disk if necessary), then in the finish() function, our reduce > function > > rearranges the ordering and process based on the new ordering. > > > > > If you want sorted values, you can get that in Hadoop, though it's not > on by > default. >=20 > Also, the reducer only needs to keep all the values for a single key = in > RAM > in this case. In your case, since the keys come in any order, the > reducer > would have to keep all the values for every key in that partition in > RAM. I > guess you're suggesting that you could have enough partitions that > "every > key in that partition" is only one or two, but for large datasets this > just > doesn't soudn feasible (can you get millions of SQS queues?) >=20 > Sure, you can implement your own paging to disk, and then an external > sort, > and then read them back in the more convenient sorted order. But then > you're > just implementing what Hadoop already does for you :) >=20 > -Todd >=20 >=20 > > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you > have > > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and = delete > the > > original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-824-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 04 22:10:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75590 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 22:10:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 22:10:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 23937 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 22:10:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23728 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 22:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23700 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 22:10:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:10:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:10:33 +0000 Received: from [10.73.152.131] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c131.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.131]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nB4M9tgS059470; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:09:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1988B3.1050407@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:09:55 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , Henry Robinson Subject: Welcome Henry as ZooKeeper committer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The ZooKeeper team and the Hadoop PMC would like to welcome Henry Robinson as the newest committer on ZooKeeper! Henry, please add yourself to the ZooKeeper website's list of committers. Thanks for your hard work on behalf of ZooKeeper, Hadoop and the ASF, Patrick From general-return-825-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 06 11:33:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53947 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2009 11:33:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2009 11:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 68372 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2009 11:33:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68264 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2009 11:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68254 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2009 11:33:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:33:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:33:03 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so652484pwi.29 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:32:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=sJwMK7R82CzRVWL/PKrldmJuVbmNJJUf7jGeo6oF68k=; b=tWxiiZqrXbVAnsfVli1v7+34ilBt1nvfLl2KeZm4h7LW5NK2bky9Pvx55ddA5pGe2p jkeaCuIFsuthBqFSqhcZqaQGXmjGV3mXZzEYm6HxxA6k8PK+22iBjZAqyr8Aw7mcb33S ORFCTNj32V9K/NR4kP5DzJyRimxxj8SsccTeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=yDuVCm0JpNva4lLjmy+8ObDBZwgstmK/TMXKJyk47ieuvs/bvfeDOHFDAz9Ay+p/Wh uNr/CK+tgujMH+1cbeBE1ILYgMdS+Ir0ibboe4aELWaLiiK3j/onNJ1lG3iypqwvZrwn aFjTAUqmSYLoMUc63yRUvdTi5NpgOQaf4+Geo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.164.1 with SMTP id m1mr309636rve.134.1260099162425; Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:32:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:32:42 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af20912060332k9ddacf1u48d14d0449a68444@mail.gmail.com> Subject: How to pause a job? From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, all I'm running a job on a 10-nodes cluster. Now I want to add another node. I have to reconfigure the dfs, and restart it, but I don't want to stop the running job. It run for 1 week already. What should I do? Is there a way to pause a job, and resume it after dfs restart. Thanks! Xiao From general-return-826-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 07 03:37:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6685 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2009 03:37:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2009 03:37:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 25131 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2009 03:37:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24948 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2009 03:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24938 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2009 03:37:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:37:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:37:41 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nB73b5pv022358 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:37:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=tjjyzcNoPwFUMd1tsUS1WpKjJ7N3vrmkVONvwgdC7macGb203KxUYW9o3Rr/jJrj Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:37:04 -0800 From: Rekha Joshi To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:36:54 -0800 Subject: Re: How to pause a job? Thread-Topic: How to pause a job? Thread-Index: Acp2Z+nE1DecgjAsTBaVOz06zpmPQQAhptKt Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5a921af20912060332k9ddacf1u48d14d0449a68444@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C742762E52E1rekhajosyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C742762E52E1rekhajosyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you have workflow engine around your job, that can take care of restarti= ng the jobs. For direct hadoop execution, please refer MAPREDUCE-227/ MAPR= EDUCE-828 Not sure if it would work, you might try (effectively) blocking this job ru= n by -set-priority on this job to very low and have other VHP jobs running.= . Thanks! On 12/6/09 5:02 PM, "xiao yang" wrote: Hi, all I'm running a job on a 10-nodes cluster. Now I want to add another node. I have to reconfigure the dfs, and restart it, but I don't want to stop the running job. It run for 1 week already. What should I do? Is there a way to pause a job, and resume it after dfs restart. Thanks! Xiao --_000_C742762E52E1rekhajosyahooinccom_-- From general-return-827-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 08 05:53:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5880 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 05:53:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 05:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 69799 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 05:53:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69722 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 05:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69709 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2009 05:53:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:53:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.58] (HELO web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:52:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 18729 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2009 05:52:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1260251551; bh=lhqgTuIaKshn89fDQEll2T3TdTafsRSJJOHI8NJltCQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cWSERQi3VAW22zD2jQPicXJMvrZi0L0tVX+EESIW7xvqAktOUBsH71lZ4KjQIs7XzBAgBdK7gFv0fLpoSQYSaCS/Ngeb4iGLpQSXsBxviEhNN2lwyb9pxCud26l2FplWlOArzEDpLHqUO1TGcGPRDsrRzDi5nXI+YVN7W3aSsU8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OMUu9C5tMag8dvtvn7vbjfaNRaAE5Bx5MxJqdaHXkt3ejoYm7EguyrWpd0B4TvDG03MBnz2JxoupcfwyGo+qTLcwAoFdxEdVylvzJejUn2zITS9EAda6aJBJbD/ttjQ7+VzLHdncJxvjzMboFx3uu3gghnmcHVwHpMf5r578CB8=; Message-ID: <544693.18554.qm@web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 7tJaE8UVM1lRik8n6_8cR8EeGzCjUrQDy3UeWXBPQ8cUe2E3o.wKsxMvP80X9sP_xsdJ16uoOLi6t336lbA2mQDPi9C4vl_WcDlyljO60w3vGfi4_rqfuAnxqF4SYRdaFY5JVGV1mXf4beR8gJywuvV2Z00vSeqZn1gO9He3a1.7hWBf3cLbG5vtnBelwuOLHXiz5kvnwHNJrCHbfjY9dyAn1yr1IZHhRzVEkVTKLVzVO3RKLyF58N8lA.xa1ji_jAjj4_NFNSuEpsJdC8zBvVsIi4q.HEIdCSKV1VX5esdASev79Jt2i8eNP5QP1Ii4iNg3oE_JYdSr1c8auNRes2r081Lvx8EJ01oHmvSwQsRMeAu53zUvi_svunhxnnSSN2.5CCA2rh3cDKX7OH6YkAFf5lC22FNkbXDS7VqHequU4_PpuidMZDqRkCcGJLCjNdDSMDgg Received: from [74.73.1.126] by web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:52:31 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/240.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:52:31 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Subproject for core-user/-dev ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I was hoping somebody could help me understand where core-user/-dev lists belong in Hadoop-land. Each Hadoop subproject has its own -user and -dev list. There is no "Core" subproject listed on hadoop.apache.org, yet we have core-user and core-dev. Moreover, there is a problem with core-user/-dev archives over on: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ . Short version: core-user/-dev are not being archived. I described this problem the other day: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2363 Thanks, Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch From general-return-828-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 08 06:22:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53894 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 06:22:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 06:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 97686 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 06:22:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97588 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 06:22:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97578 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2009 06:22:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:22:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.199] (HELO mail-px0-f199.google.com) (209.85.216.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:22:05 +0000 Received: by pxi37 with SMTP id 37so1784835pxi.20 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:21:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DDGvQd9mBPJN8hILl7qrgHI6fS2GKNeqN8CGxK7CkDc=; b=DJlSWyfNqdo6tZGrjfjaw/9XWfdQCDry+Y/fmT1C/CWGhTd0tU5d/TKNjEeXnqjJyj uGJLbRQDTVB4/JoSKj1mPt+U6e29sPj/8fgobl2eJqn4UajOtddN/7oKRukEiRvdHJHY GCcrA7xtQDcinVkL7qx+H53OO2m2oOwZJ77U8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wUZeOUzUmflNcq5RM9Tew1UIfcqxPryrMYVS5pRzSgtNYfdg94d5saikvZU1nBMzp4 hisq3MMztCfU9qpoEQhvhfUO87hZQJoK6wjdnnvk4AlgPYn2Yh0XRilh2fXJryeG6WGW +UoUlwMPxKUISX6HVryQA+83JapqmMe6wH2js= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.35.18 with SMTP id n18mr448904rvj.245.1260253304523; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:21:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5a921af20912060332k9ddacf1u48d14d0449a68444@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:21:44 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af20912072221g75207fd8yc3086763ecbfb87a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to pause a job? From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for reply. The job finally failed. It seems that I should make sure the job won't take too long next time. On 12/7/09, Rekha Joshi wrote: > > If you have workflow engine around your job, that can take care of > restarting the jobs. For direct hadoop execution, please refer > MAPREDUCE-227/ MAPREDUCE-828 > > Not sure if it would work, you might try (effectively) blocking this job run > by -set-priority on this job to very low and have other VHP jobs running.. > Thanks! > > On 12/6/09 5:02 PM, "xiao yang" wrote: > > Hi, all > > I'm running a job on a 10-nodes cluster. > Now I want to add another node. > I have to reconfigure the dfs, and restart it, but I don't want to > stop the running job. It run for 1 week already. > What should I do? Is there a way to pause a job, and resume it after > dfs restart. > > Thanks! > Xiao > > From general-return-829-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 08 07:06:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74420 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 07:06:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 07:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 52174 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 07:06:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52092 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 07:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52082 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2009 07:06:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:06:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.199] (HELO mail-px0-f199.google.com) (209.85.216.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:06:01 +0000 Received: by pxi37 with SMTP id 37so1811091pxi.20 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:05:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wbm2KFAMa876OnZKJhF29FIxExTbrvT3x3mqwDJpgB0=; b=aaaaMNGA68KyelGmdalTe/xf7etK+ZEfFSPBCPD/eN/Lku3F+TPJrbxhw/Cbs7bnG1 pVae2WgFerQTR+lwzPwNTLul6yH9+oZvlebjddCdUuA1jhAWGWYP3D0/+3ihbv3rYDnI 9TAiiq3pWfS58yuyGV/2LuS3VE0kHDFwfKuWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GHqqVuwQfL4cN0UUYobQxz0hO1tiwfB0IIAWAbHxNoJ5R4NkJTaNtCB0Sm24Q1w/d2 qqnU57HyDrlb00gFc00jwDT1MqNv7EWOj6bZeZjPetrZiYGz1WKwJDGb813G8bdS+L1Y dcZ3IPRi09sw2Dd+1fovRpmhiSSzYs8COahXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.128.9 with SMTP id a9mr470884rvd.146.1260255940725; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:05:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <544693.18554.qm@web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <544693.18554.qm@web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:05:40 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0912072305kca01557q63a7ceced6e60821@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Subproject for core-user/-dev ? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd29600ac4a9a047a3233c0 --000e0cd29600ac4a9a047a3233c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Core became Common when we moved out HDFS and MapReduce. So core-dev == common-dev, core-user == common-user, and so on. -- Owen --000e0cd29600ac4a9a047a3233c0-- From general-return-830-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 08 07:48:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81853 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 07:48:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 07:48:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 83610 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 07:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83524 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 07:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83514 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2009 07:48:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chillycreator@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:48:40 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so1789321pwi.29 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:48:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=jU79l1HztZtRyaNNle4rMVGoXq5A3vRiSHgvKHcmpg0=; b=kQ+IdwVDTae/+jF4vbr/HXlwfeHWXOnIQ4+bBKHtrTrjaLe29BYQhMXhkKZqf32Z8R LxLl8xteRSNit2y9X375C6rAgNWuDtbuRhtLf7v/lYvQr7Wqgr/ijr8bA2ReAoZ9YMn5 8b8OCzGsHDj41kezfJwhdMxrWKr7IR9cgFxzg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JR99Nq0vrlK+6wieCxKpmFLfuWqfCY4B75fdqT1GNQ3tZRPH+eP73toSfW2BCjaqV8 /6n1htE9pDiIawyL6EBZE9zExUtg6MLHKp+8PvxqwFMbMFBMBK33RLPgbimc2xAlbDaD JHaMxi9/n9dY/brWNY6SfHOtXTh/ji2WE62GE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.62.35 with SMTP id k35mr862099wfa.129.1260258499214; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:48:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:48:19 +0800 Message-ID: <50e3be80912072348s1ee86294h83425bd64fea5b31@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hbase & BigTable & RDBMS From: chico CHEN To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0a9be2bc039047a32ccb4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0a9be2bc039047a32ccb4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi guys, I am a newer here. Recently, I am thinking about the data model of Bigtable-like and that of RDBMS. I feel confused about the difference of the two. Take the blog-comment relation as the example. If we use RDBMS, there will be three tables: one is blogs; one is comments; and the last one is blog-comments relational table. If we use HBase or Bigtable, there will be one table like: blogID timer blog:content blog:comments. If our tables in RDBMS is denormal, we can put comments into blogs and combine them as one table. Is there something wrong in my example or my thoughts? Or else, where are the differences in the two data models? And why did somebody say "RDBMS is not suitable for cloud computing"? Thank you for taking some minutes to answer my questions. -chico CHEN --001636e0a9be2bc039047a32ccb4-- From general-return-831-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 08 18:30:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47789 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2009 18:30:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2009 18:30:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 34792 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 18:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34668 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2009 18:30:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34658 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2009 18:30:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:30:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.61] (HELO web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.61) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:30:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 80536 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2009 18:29:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1260296985; bh=7hHoAK339WKi+EuTvwz6BjUfijMoguBWwJTkYD/g/tQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rtryGvagUSv/g55wnpQ9MgxYWDrC2nbyDQJ7lUsNsi2d1jmhOLpRCW5qOcClmsElnerHndDMqlD/DjnKNF1p+nnmcr2vE49e8lAc2joVf0fSeNeHhkpslnHir75F9QPZGEoZ13ZMdzdOngNpEs0AD1uTnykYJT+nq6jwsbOdedY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P6G8bzYFWYIppeM+S2FLxEj4UwFs0i8GxQMSN9ZY5AOW7a+oMClGA2UV+uEJEoFq0z5ziS/I2Rko4lHo64OEXFPQzDu/4Fur7INPQ7ixyGAC5WqLh4XteD68YSjQjPh58p67kejzlWjgNETw5eWoaoI7e4eKk/dXt1siP0CkAhY=; Message-ID: <906133.80299.qm@web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: a2tcveIVM1lr_EmNfeSMwUPLz4g6DmEuduZlkyVmTIxTfzAwkT6JnzeAYelXyu5BrA8DemzDcdCn2ugTw9fNM9lPheMd1L_u7HgbuH_YJcTzYeHxmDRSr_lzFel7N4r_Bqq59SzK4QaMY7Xmhk4uAZstKZxDQAiZkHcjst5nrP69b662iA8tziWtJC46lwh8gg._tx.gys5VWD7mrsS2mz2g_jK9sts4vrYRRyqb6sucW9nESy_qafHi..RXsxueTreSNrvmR0WWDtnfkQFKCNgoT.mq3xlLd64znfu5vNosjSibhzags0TZnE.qOEP8LXkmq.Cc3OZqyt3ZBDvp3KjthPOiGptN1L_6tAC8yzNrwFGuoEuCuqgKufRJn6r4st9hJfnsyo_zr4l.FIpLvWEKlCdnSnubQSG7k5j5yL_eBWC8eBA3 Received: from [167.206.188.3] by web50307.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:29:45 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/240.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <544693.18554.qm@web50304.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <5f7f740b0912072305kca01557q63a7ceced6e60821@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:29:45 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Subproject for core-user/-dev ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b0912072305kca01557q63a7ceced6e60821@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Aha, I see: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-core-user/ Became: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/ So https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2363 could really be closed as "Won't Fix", ha? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Owen O'Malley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 2:05:40 AM > Subject: Re: Subproject for core-user/-dev ? > > Core became Common when we moved out HDFS and MapReduce. So core-dev == > common-dev, core-user == common-user, and so on. > > -- Owen From general-return-832-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 11 15:32:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34382 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2009 15:32:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2009 15:32:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70127 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 15:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69090 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2009 15:32:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69075 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2009 15:32:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:32:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:32:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 34051 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2009 15:31:44 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ew0-f212.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username edwardyoon, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:31:44 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so1211345ewy.12 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:31:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.195 with SMTP id a45mr600348wef.63.1260545502693; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:31:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:31:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Announcement of the BSP (Bulk Synchronous Parallel) package on Hadoop From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: hama-user@incubator.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, mahout-user@lucene.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello communities, Now I'm happy to announce that we've developed new computing model called BSP (Bulk Synchronous Parallel) on top of Hadoop. Here are the slides for the topic "Apache HAMA: An Introduction to Bulk Synchronization Parallel on Hadoop": Download a PDF file: http://wiki.apache.org/hama/BulkSynchronizationParallel?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Apache_HAMA_BSP.pdf or Google Docs: http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dc8qtchr_1f44rjccd Any advices and questions are welcome. Thanks, Hama Team -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardyoon@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org From general-return-833-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 03:19:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42244 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 03:19:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 03:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 32426 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 03:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32218 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 03:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32208 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 03:19:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:19:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.24] (HELO exprod7og123.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:19:42 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.172]) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSyMLuBq84GJSiUnEXU/SqY051vaR1tSy@postini.com; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:19:21 PST Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1014451iwn.16 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:19:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.10.23 with SMTP id n23mr2151517ibn.4.1260587955020; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:19:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:19:14 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325579eb2446235047a7f81fd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325579eb2446235047a7f81fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi there: I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need for quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each record is one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the data set. one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC U2 0 0 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we are interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this "position of match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to accomplish the task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? Thanks! Xueling --000325579eb2446235047a7f81fd-- From general-return-834-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 03:35:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49771 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 03:35:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 03:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 40675 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 03:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40478 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 03:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40468 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 03:35:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:35:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:35:23 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1102457pxi.5 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:35:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.9 with SMTP id c9mr1325962wfj.7.1260588901365; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:35:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:34:41 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Xueling, One important question that can really change the answer: How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them randomly very often? Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, or 1= 0ms? Thanks -Todd On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu wrot= e: > =A0Hi there: > > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need for > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each record i= s > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the data s= et. > > > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC U2 = 0 0 > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we are > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this "position = of > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to accomplish t= he > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > > Thanks! > > Xueling > From general-return-835-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 18:38:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39286 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 18:38:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 18:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 21413 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 18:38:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21325 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 18:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21315 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 18:38:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.215] (HELO exprod7og114.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:38:23 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.199]) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSyPjCtTzYta+I3eRYssybrCtsjGurlvU@postini.com; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:38:03 PST Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so1381994iwn.30 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:38:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.5.23 with SMTP id 23mr2957598ibt.45.1260643081744; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:38:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:38:01 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773da30137215047a8c57a7 --00151773da30137215047a8c57a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Todd: Thank you for your reply. The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into 24 tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up the search then the product is what we are looking for. Cheers, Xueling On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > One important question that can really change the answer: > > How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > randomly very often? > > Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, or > 10ms? > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > Hi there: > > > > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need for > > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > > > > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each record > is > > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the data > set. > > > > > > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC U2 > 0 0 > > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > > > > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we are > > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this "position > of > > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > > > > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to accomplish > the > > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Xueling > > > --00151773da30137215047a8c57a7-- From general-return-836-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 21:02:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63791 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 21:02:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 21:02:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3556 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 21:02:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3464 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 21:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3453 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 21:02:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:02:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:02:19 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so1365929pwi.29 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:01:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.3.37 with SMTP id 37mr1842060wfc.146.1260651719142; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:01:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:01:39 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Xueling, In that case, I would recommend the following: 1) Put all of your data on HDFS 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - basically a set of entries like this: where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of entries following" column. The start and finish block will be partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. -Todd On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu wro= te: > Hi Todd: > > Thank you for your reply. > > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into 24 > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up t= he > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > Cheers, > Xueling > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi Xueling, >> >> One important question that can really change the answer: >> >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them >> randomly very often? >> >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, o= r >> 10ms? >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu >> wrote: >> > =A0Hi there: >> > >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need fo= r >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) >> > >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each recor= d >> is >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the dat= a >> set. >> > >> > >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC = U2 >> 0 0 >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C >> > >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we a= re >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this "positi= on >> of >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. >> > >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to accomplis= h >> the >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > Xueling >> > >> > From general-return-837-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 22:51:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3945 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 22:51:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 22:51:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 66494 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 22:51:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66399 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 22:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66389 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 22:51:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:51:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:51:15 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so1048786qyk.5 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:50:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O0gIwrAbfhoo3fF28mWQn7cV4cQx/FCwD++ElnuLxvk=; b=Ja6ozZY36oCRJLYF7aFF3URPjxnfRUvEnOrqYqWFWyo65RIBFaoBPBJHYQF9VEdaeF dBytv2pd6/79+CVaMEVHuG6BEgRfCQdtOLLcgmL5pT5yPhfGUYU99WAKGuamIBt0oskv fvJ0g6162EUf2vEeJEDvkuD7bNang8EocS/jg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mmVtcSO5rRBksEpksqzfIIZIiYQ2oYOCZ9Ca0maKPaZhz+g/G8j3+eULXnSIwFYmXn TjUhxYlyGkdIwFqpjJfBYJdsIXQmMX/jpRHY9UVhPmGypXKapyiK5om7phVnfqbr1zjU hs/elCLhc3EfbfcypeOUT68fhhcPRbXPCI5sw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.28.16 with SMTP id k16mr1595250qcc.70.1260658253899; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:50:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:50:53 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cbcf129e23be6231 Message-ID: <7c962aed0912121450y30f8b86cm54e652002bd14d6f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636426bef682ad2047a8fdf5c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636426bef682ad2047a8fdf5c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You might also consider hbase, particularly If you find that your data is being updated with some regularity, particularly if the updates are randomly distributed over the data set. See http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/r0.20.2/api/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/package-summary.html#bulkfor how to do a fast bulk load of your billiions of rows of data. Yours, St.Ack On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > In that case, I would recommend the following: > > 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > basically a set of entries like this: > > > > where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > > Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > -Todd > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > Hi Todd: > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is > > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into 24 > > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up > the > > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > > > Cheers, > > Xueling > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Hi Xueling, > >> > >> One important question that can really change the answer: > >> > >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > >> randomly very often? > >> > >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, > or > >> 10ms? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu > >> wrote: > >> > Hi there: > >> > > >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need > for > >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > >> > > >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > record > >> is > >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the > data > >> set. > >> > > >> > > >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > U2 > >> 0 0 > >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > >> > > >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we > are > >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > "position > >> of > >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > >> > > >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > accomplish > >> the > >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > Xueling > >> > > >> > > > --001636426bef682ad2047a8fdf5c-- From general-return-838-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 22:56:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4677 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 22:56:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 22:56:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69606 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 22:56:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69519 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 22:56:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69509 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 22:56:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:56:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xshu@systemsbiology.org designates 64.18.2.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.217] (HELO exprod7og115.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:56:24 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.182]) by exprod7ob115.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSyQfglSNwpnNQymIUG+njpl9H+ooTW19@postini.com; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:56:04 PST Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so1479766iwn.27 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:56:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.123.216 with SMTP id q24mr1851003ibr.43.1260658562277; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:56:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:56:02 -0800 Message-ID: <28902f870912121456g116054b3re1e42d317b12e083@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Xueling Shu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64698e4c9b02b047a8ff15e --0016e64698e4c9b02b047a8ff15e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Great information! Thank you for your help, Todd. Xueling On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Xueling, > > In that case, I would recommend the following: > > 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > basically a set of entries like this: > > > > where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > > Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > -Todd > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu > wrote: > > Hi Todd: > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is > > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into 24 > > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up > the > > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > > > Cheers, > > Xueling > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> Hi Xueling, > >> > >> One important question that can really change the answer: > >> > >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > >> randomly very often? > >> > >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, > or > >> 10ms? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu > >> wrote: > >> > Hi there: > >> > > >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need > for > >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > >> > > >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > record > >> is > >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the > data > >> set. > >> > > >> > > >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > U2 > >> 0 0 > >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > >> > > >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we > are > >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > "position > >> of > >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > >> > > >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > accomplish > >> the > >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > Xueling > >> > > >> > > > --0016e64698e4c9b02b047a8ff15e-- From general-return-839-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 12 23:31:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11864 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 23:31:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 23:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 91037 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 23:31:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90943 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 23:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90933 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 23:31:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:31:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fzappert@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:31:41 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so1057011qyk.5 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:31:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=he9TQqttFeHkrsUsM/yknLg5kLomPymjuD2bsXI4tlk=; b=P0nyVqne0ETfWKBrNRtBvFsvn2U71rd7l+9CYbJxa89RC5h1716goJMyKfQRUVs8As aIOgEvxd1njC7Dpc5JVd+hGvFReFCLw+hFYutXPlZedZkIR7RzXC5rVFdL9x+j7gkmMm 0HbyrWymGvyg49b0ABKPosztptCphyN7Kohy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jGJ3683T0vRPrJt6RCPbQNFY5VTzjAVlEgA2YuXtz2wQXE3B2jr1lz5C8GG7QXf5AO 2MT3cwssKo6gc29Dchw0OC5zrNK5yNG1jrubPPDPlkm8fs1DRBVy9uaXI+ULOwdSimiE yCayEJ0IcLYPW7a9YlqQgjpXcPp/oKFrfREO4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.101.165 with SMTP id c37mr1694312qco.5.1260660679551; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:31:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28902f870912121456g116054b3re1e42d317b12e083@mail.gmail.com> References: <28902f870912111919s3f1a86adp75635e8c23d15d69@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912111934v2960fb36s1922507c9bc61675@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121038g644b72b0vc832ec1343c16687@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70912121301x353192du44becd5c16dce181@mail.gmail.com> <28902f870912121456g116054b3re1e42d317b12e083@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:31:19 -0800 Message-ID: <14048aeb0912121531p78d02705vf4402a041658c668@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which Hadoop product is more appropriate for a quick query on a large data set? From: Fred Zappert To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee4c8fcacfb047a906fb0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ee4c8fcacfb047a906fb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 for hbase On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Xueling Shu wrote: > Great information! Thank you for your help, Todd. > > Xueling > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi Xueling, > > > > In that case, I would recommend the following: > > > > 1) Put all of your data on HDFS > > 2) Write a MapReduce job that sorts the data by position of match > > 3) As a second output of this job, you can write a "sparse index" - > > basically a set of entries like this: > > > > > > > > where you're basically giving offsets into every 10K records or so. If > > you index every 10K records, then 5 billion total will mean 100,000 > > index entries. Each index entry shouldn't be more than 20 bytes, so > > 100,000 entries will be 2MB. This is super easy to fit into memory. > > (you could probably index every 100th record instead and end up with > > 200MB, still easy to fit in memory) > > > > Then to satisfy your count-range query, you can simply scan your > > in-memory sparse index. Some of the indexed blocks will be completely > > included in the range, in which case you just add up the "number of > > entries following" column. The start and finish block will be > > partially covered, so you can use the file offset info to load that > > file off HDFS, start reading at that offset, and finish the count. > > > > Total time per query should be <100ms no problem. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Xueling Shu > > wrote: > > > Hi Todd: > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > > > The datasets wont be updated often. But the query against a data set is > > > frequent. The quicker the query, the better. For example we have done > > > testing on a Mysql database (5 billion records randomly scattered into > 24 > > > tables) and the slowest query against the biggest table (400,000,000 > > > records) is around 12 mins. So if using any Hadoop product can speed up > > the > > > search then the product is what we are looking for. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Xueling > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Xueling, > > >> > > >> One important question that can really change the answer: > > >> > > >> How often does the dataset change? Can the changes be merged in in > > >> bulk every once in a while, or do you need to actually update them > > >> randomly very often? > > >> > > >> Also, how fast is "quick"? Do you mean 1 minute, 10 seconds, 1 second, > > or > > >> 10ms? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Xueling Shu > > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi there: > > >> > > > >> > I am researching Hadoop to see which of its products suits our need > > for > > >> > quick queries against large data sets (billions of records per set) > > >> > > > >> > The queries will be performed against chip sequencing data. Each > > record > > >> is > > >> > one line in a file. To be clear below shows a sample record in the > > data > > >> set. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > one line (record) looks like: 1-1-174-418 > TGTGTCCCTTTGTAATGAATCACTATC > > U2 > > >> 0 0 > > >> > 1 4 *103570835* F .. 23G 24C > > >> > > > >> > The highlighted field is called "position of match" and the query we > > are > > >> > interested in is the # of sequences in a certain range of this > > "position > > >> of > > >> > match". For instance the range can be "position of match" > 200 and > > >> > "position of match" + 36 < 200,000. > > >> > > > >> > Any suggestions on the Hadoop product I should start with to > > accomplish > > >> the > > >> > task? HBase,Pig,Hive, or ...? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > > > >> > Xueling > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --0016364ee4c8fcacfb047a906fb0-- From general-return-840-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 14 21:34:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97457 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 21:34:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 21:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 78861 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 21:34:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78485 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 21:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78435 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2009 21:34:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:34:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:34:43 +0000 Received: from [10.72.168.6] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c6.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.6]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nBELYBmR057375; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:34:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B26AF53.9070604@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:34:11 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.1.2. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. If you are upgrading from version 2.2.1 on SourceForge be sure to review the 3.0.1 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.1.2 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.1.2/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-841-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 14 21:35:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97786 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 21:35:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 21:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 80055 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 21:35:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79875 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2009 21:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79822 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2009 21:35:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:35:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:35:12 +0000 Received: from [10.72.168.6] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c6.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.6]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nBELYj3O057690; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:34:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B26AF74.7020509@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:34:44 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.2.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.2.2. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. If you are upgrading from version 2.2.1 on SourceForge be sure to review the 3.0.1 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.2.2 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.2.2/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-842-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 15 18:06:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40982 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 18:06:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 18:06:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 1757 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 18:06:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1565 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 18:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1545 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2009 18:06:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:06:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:05:51 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nBFI4u5X009971; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:04:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=QULAQWy2LXfZf38tOhcf2imB6pTraKqGM6mJYsN3Sc4FPSOmIAxxHv8tO8Qf2ZoG Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:04:55 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:04:47 -0800 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Video recording available for Nov 18th meeting Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Video recording available for Nov 18th meeting Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCpfO4pAMMLNs0A== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD9A702CE@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: +E4= AN5+ ByUA DNB7 FWe6 J/2l Kx2W M17g M/Eh Q+SY RVD9 TiBh VfXU WaPd WfHj Xkg3;2;YwBvAG0AbQBvAG4ALQB1AHMAZQByAEAAaABhAGQAbwBvAHAALgBhAHAAYQBjAGgAZQAuAG8AcgBnADsAZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{382AC0F7-E38B-4AE9-9007-0657061F41C1};ZABlAGsAZQBsAEAAeQBhAGgAbwBvAC0AaQBuAGMALgBjAG8AbQA=;Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:04:47 GMT;SABhAGQAbwBvAHAAIABVAHMAZQByACAARwByAG8AdQBwACAAKABCAGEAeQAgAEEAcgBlAGEAKQAgAC0AIABWAGkAZABlAG8AIAByAGUAYwBvAHIAZABpAG4AZwAgAGEAdgBhAGkAbABhAGIAbABlACAAZgBvAHIAIABOAG8AdgAgACAAMQA4AHQAaAAgAG0AZQBlAHQAaQBuAGcA x-cr-puzzleid: {382AC0F7-E38B-4AE9-9007-0657061F41C1} acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, For those of you who were not able to join us in person for the Nov 18th me= eting at Yahoo!, please see the blog post below for video recording and sli= de-share of the interesting presentations held in this event. http://feeds.developer.yahoo.net/~r/YDNHadoop/~3/_7yYod3aht4/1118_hadoop_ba= y_area_user_grou.html Happy holidays Dekel From general-return-843-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 16 15:25:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19878 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2009 15:25:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2009 15:25:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11532 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2009 15:25:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11368 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2009 15:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11350 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2009 15:25:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:25:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:25:33 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99D66BBAA for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:24:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B28FBD8.5020001@crs4.it> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:25:12 +0100 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: First Italian HUG Meeting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We are wondering whether there is interest in a Hadoop User Group meeting in Italy. Our main area of interest is bioinformatics applications, specifically deep sequencing data analysis, but anything MapReduce-related would be great for sharing ideas. The event could be hosted, let's say this upcoming Spring, by us at CRS4 -- Distributed Computing (http://dc.crs4.it). It could be a "birds of a feather" meeting where people discuss what they are doing with Hadoop and how, in an informal fashion, and maybe give some tutorial presentations. For instance, we could talk about our experience in Python MapReduce programming and integration with scheduling systems (Sun Grid Engine). Please e-mail me if you like the idea, so that we can assess whether there is enough interest in having the meeting. -- Simone Leo Distributed Computing group Advanced Computing and Communications program CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simleo@crs4.it http://dc.crs4.it From general-return-844-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 16 21:26:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86068 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 30123 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2009 21:26:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29996 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2009 21:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29977 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2009 21:26:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of psdc1978@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:26:27 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so1410444fxm.29 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:26:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=jtby23HK6ipaX9zrX8s0MCPNs8U83I/O1D8hVa38DT4=; b=FfTaDtEo6wWZzKZZ+DOX54U8Q0c2nfxUxwIKOXqbWpy69m/v4NZWLsoX4SP2Z6lE30 eBIScj1zLjiBTXSX+LYXPWWXykAULAozCL/OGJ8I3L9EVDSHsXZvqOQukAtMBjG9Hj9h e5Y8WrsmRtqw4j+Wjhi6ATjbEHn1mSXI95Fzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pKZnhKtLIU2b50eQprY1zuTqgpcSwaQdotdtiA3LCUumUPsh9uEZavybXAUBC5TBtQ /zbtMQZ/fEUoR3PVIj6MOKq3akEUmj1MAv+epGBDfZtwDzJ/Cd8PUsZNN9jxY/WkEf7t SNokbufXPYBzs76sfbl+oLIhVzZq747hSrbzk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.130.31 with SMTP id 31mr159163hbh.134.1260998764067; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:26:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:26:04 +0000 Message-ID: <61fec3fc0912161326k63debf43me9361c3b30182d03@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Defining the number of map tasks From: psdc1978 To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I would like to have several Map tasks that execute the same tasks. For example, I've 3 map tasks (M1, M2 and M3) and a 1Gb of input data to be read by each map. Each map should read the same input data and send the result to the same Reduce. At the end, the reduce should produce the same 3 results. Put in conf/slaves file 3 instances of the same machine localhost localhost localhost does it solve the problem? How I define the number of map tasks to run? Best regards, -- xeon From general-return-845-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 18 13:43:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25205 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2009 13:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Dec 2009 13:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69641 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2009 13:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69562 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2009 13:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69552 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2009 13:43:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:43:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of admin@jobomix.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:43:15 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so2200686bwz.29 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.68 with SMTP id n4mr2377655bkw.54.1261143774719; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:42:54 +0000 Message-ID: <9bb662ec0912180542o3753e927t48c64eb4cfed282a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Encoding Hell From: Bruno Abitbol To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d0064b3f18b047b00eac1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175d0064b3f18b047b00eac1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I have been playing around for two days trying to figure out an issue related to the default charset: - When I run a very dummy job which just displays the default charset on hadoop using the pseudo connected mode, I obtain US-ASCII. When I display the java property file.encoding I obtain ANSI_X3.4-1968 - When I run the same job under Eclipse in locale mode I obtain UTF-8 (which is the one I expect). I use a Linux Gentoo distribution, the locale env variables are the following: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_GB.UTF-8" LC_ALL=en_GB.UTF-8 I have tried to set the file.encoding property to UTF-8 but it doesn't work. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. -- Bruno Abitbol bruno.abitbol@jobomix.com http://www.jobomix.fr --0015175d0064b3f18b047b00eac1-- From general-return-846-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 21 17:43:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10134 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2009 17:43:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2009 17:43:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 98039 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 17:43:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97938 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 17:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97928 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2009 17:43:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:43:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:43:10 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1911913fgg.11 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:42:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OxX9qiGu93v7HHDcNexvZG9T7IjeSihByWT2LX5uaqs=; b=LPvelHHc8DdqEFA3THNA1i7EiidGW5/txdRyuqGh/pQ/JKyx6ft6ysrMW50erVRZHL W/hHqDslnYMA0caiboCThyDBlKaPyu5f7CX8bZs4EIVD1XCF9VXs/3xZAzjA4WIycAQM pHVkJ8gaf44263y517/gucWFjTWgRBI2zBWEE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Plt1O/GVmdV2ACR2U311PxlmbT6pdpZ/ksAV+erpkhBjU+WOxda8aafOvysIAnyAeE T19TnHSV7juSkIrzBXq6UCpw5KPvLXqicdUhLt7g33xuyov5ZUzmI2lJHphQSMZdyG1l aV+29lQyaxn7mQT6xbeTQu/nT9E3eD37hAaQQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.133 with SMTP id e5mr2606832wef.23.1261417369362; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:42:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:42:49 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30912210942w714b1ab7x3aa4b1d4207f667f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: InputFormat related question... From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab05236e25d047b409e92 --0016e6dab05236e25d047b409e92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In my application I have a file in this format: The first line of the file contains the data to be processed, and *each* of the remaining lines contain parameters that will be used to slice & dice the data in various ways. In other words, each mapper needs two lines - the 1st line from this file that contains data and another line that contains parameters. I looked at NLineInputFormat which can be used for "parameter sweeps", but it's not quite what I want. I believe this format returns N no. of consecutive lines to the mapper, correct? What's the best way to handle this case? Do I have to write a special InputFormat class? Please help. Thanks. --0016e6dab05236e25d047b409e92-- From general-return-847-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 21 21:07:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93741 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2009 21:07:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2009 21:07:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 67974 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 21:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67524 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2009 21:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67488 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2009 21:07:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:07:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:07:08 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so5614083yxe.5 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:06:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.129.20 with SMTP id g20mr222575agn.7.1261429606731; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:06:46 -0800 (PST) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:06:22 -0800 Message-ID: <69035570912211306k1eccbf79rcc02d5b6ecc4104c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Announcement: Cloudera Hadoop Training - Featuring Tom White and the Facebook Data Team To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Fans, it's been a few weeks since we've hosted public training sessions, and now we're happy to announce three sessions in three cities over the next three months. These sessions are all targeted at developers, and we'll be adding more sessions in the coming weeks based on demand. You can always find a full list at http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training January 19-21, Bay Area, CA - http://www.eventbrite.com/event/511080656 February 3-5, New York, NY - http://www.eventbrite.com/event/511180956 March 10-12, Washington DC Area - http://www.eventbrite.com/event/517223028 All of these sessions offer a 10% discount for booking in advance (timeframe varies by session), so if you register before the holidays, you'll save a few bucks. As some of you may have heard, Tom White, author of O'Reilly's "Hadoop: The Definitive Guide," has recently relocated to the Bay Area. We couldn't be happier to have him in the Cloudera office more, and are excited to have him leading more of our local training sessions. Tom will be leading the January 19-21 session, so if you've found his book helpful, this is a great chance to learn more from the source. We're also thrilled to be working with Facebook. Many of our customers have asked us for more exposure to how Hadoop and related technologies are used in the "real world." As one of the largest Hadoop users, and surely the largest Hive user, Facebook offers a unique perspective on how to leverage huge volumes of data across an organization. During next month's session in the Bay Area, Facebook will give a tech talk (over lunch) on how they use Hadoop and Hive, and go into detail about some of the cool things their data team does with the technology. Lastly, if you're interested in working at Facebook, this is a great chance to get more information, meet some of their most avid Hadoop users and demonstrate you skills by taking the Cloudera Certified Hadoop Developer exam. Cheers, Christophe -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera From general-return-848-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 22 04:33:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55936 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 04:33:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 04:33:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 58066 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 04:32:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58013 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 04:32:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58003 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 04:32:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:32:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:32:32 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nBM4VrEV018253 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:31:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=1y5HrgROHPxKhdKv/SIMby5c+FL+Q36MBhPeK0t/uBT4oInBTFqqwNPjFhvHXAdM Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:01:52 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:01:52 +0530 Subject: Re: InputFormat related question... Thread-Topic: InputFormat related question... Thread-Index: AcqCZTE+Kk7yIDiHRs+vcGmey7IrsgAWn3E1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30912210942w714b1ab7x3aa4b1d4207f667f@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7564990EA0Bamarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7564990EA0Bamarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, If you want map task to process two lines at a time, you need to write a Re= cordReader which constructs two lines per record. LineRecordReader makes on= e line as one record. You can extend NLineInputFormat for generating splits and return your new R= ecordReader for reading records from split. Hope this helps you. Thanks Amareshwari On 12/21/09 11:12 PM, "Something Something" wrot= e: In my application I have a file in this format: The first line of the file contains the data to be processed, and *each* of the remaining lines contain parameters that will be used to slice & dice th= e data in various ways. In other words, each mapper needs two lines - the 1s= t line from this file that contains data and another line that contains parameters. I looked at NLineInputFormat which can be used for "parameter sweeps", but it's not quite what I want. I believe this format returns N no. of consecutive lines to the mapper, correct? What's the best way to handle this case? Do I have to write a special InputFormat class? Please help. Thanks. --_000_C7564990EA0Bamarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-849-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 24 00:22:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83705 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 00:22:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2009 00:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 52865 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 00:22:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52781 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 00:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52771 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2009 00:22:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:22:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:22:38 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 25so559110eya.23 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:22:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Qm9vLphRCDt8yVIhJ9QW7//mzdoST2QrREMHxRxXPKg=; b=XxozsfNiGT7cBsv5cdxJ9FXtfbKrEZMzPPfvxGRwrwQSKVUK1IRwaYeMGSm7R6dtW2 7mgBf5wYmILhTUUTlXT3NVjeqURWa8/NlMEG49f9I1fCSenyLyod0wX9VywIWDiyCNIM 3g6oDPquzHZvPjMo4nWEQojmMlH4zef1W5XUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=xFB/mm1bRzmjthpjZxjHTQjNfx0HT45jSJdXkMYTP9IKmDFdeNpVnlCNBZG0N5RgPI glJJw0KN5cAywFqDo77sP0Cy73Cx2YK2QRtLc7wMHqSDAo4SjOX7h1c0PJ9ZkrqDSLsQ 97A7fy1/EusMeNEdUED1OqR4Xsz3rHpLapKWs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.69 with SMTP id k47mr3383570wef.179.1261614137812; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:22:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:22:17 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Type mismatch in key from map From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d78423872e92047b6e6e17 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d78423872e92047b6e6e17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would like to feed a file created by one job as an input to the next job. When I do that, I get: java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:807) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.write(MapTask.java:504) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskInputOutputContext.write(TaskInputOutputContext.java:80) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:124) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:583) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) The first job does: context.write(key, value) - in a loop. This creates a file (/part-r-00000) that contains something like this... 1 1,2,4*6*,1** 1 2,2,6*,4** 2 1,6,2*3*5*6*7*8*,1** 2 2,6,3*5*6*7*8*,2** & so on... Now in my second job I do: FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(inFile)); Where inFile is set to the one created above (/part-r-00000) What am I doing wrong? Please help. Thanks. --0016e6d78423872e92047b6e6e17-- From general-return-850-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 24 02:16:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33176 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 02:16:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2009 02:16:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 8423 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 02:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8332 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 02:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8322 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2009 02:16:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:16:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:16:31 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so5654310pxi.2 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:16:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=D09udwOA1c4Lib02feHvDJxFMBBj8YJJ1SHUofsAr18=; b=wvRFIBQAxSVbtQ+KqOeUiATkiMDa5YyiHEBIH4LBnbn8uTRrHsGrStvV9en0GoEv83 ZFpyzkLVwNUiVQLRlevSHeCyExLxXnoIyws7ZTqo0agzryDvfEjLOH+/EOylqHDSOLWj C7FX2n5QCtUOWWi93xzgA+uNb2FdMTdnegrgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Iw4AFkJZWu51YZd0orgzk4R2fHo+QXzE8502bg41l+EyJv/hFqNbTKD/pmt2xBxcen INFANVkw6yrIbX9nDiVvpvOl4vUd+n8wcl/ogptf9mfyjlviSZSLZ8KBBWT/T7c9or8r 56of3BufGws+mb7m90iCspyxCqWA3me5dNP7Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.2.24 with SMTP id 24mr7201081wfb.139.1261620969942; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:16:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:16:09 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320912231816s58cb3f94l6b2927e82cb48cd4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Type mismatch in key from map From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502a31cc13072047b700565 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502a31cc13072047b700565 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It seems the value type of your first job's output is Text, but I guess your second job's InputFormat is TextInputFormat, the key type of TextInputFormat is LongWritable. So you will get the Type mismatch error message. I suggest you use KeyValueInputFormat as your second job's InputFormat. Jeff Zhang On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to feed a file created by one job as an input to the next job. > When I do that, I get: > > java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected > org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:807) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.write(MapTask.java:504) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskInputOutputContext.write(TaskInputOutputContext.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:124) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:583) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > > > The first job does: context.write(key, value) - in a loop. This creates a > file (/part-r-00000) that contains something like this... > > 1 1,2,4*6*,1** > 1 2,2,6*,4** > 2 1,6,2*3*5*6*7*8*,1** > 2 2,6,3*5*6*7*8*,2** > & so on... > > Now in my second job I do: > > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(inFile)); > > Where inFile is set to the one created above (/part-r-00000) > > > What am I doing wrong? Please help. Thanks. > --00504502a31cc13072047b700565-- From general-return-851-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 24 03:31:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55571 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 03:31:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2009 03:31:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 33531 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 03:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33367 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 03:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33357 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2009 03:31:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:31:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:31:30 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so5933098ewy.29 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:31:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kxAkGucRUUzi68+1sauZ+l4Cj7Tg+qvyVdx07dX+3wM=; b=hcJ2pWW5S/V+2aKxPK9qTY7kUz4X19O3ubqgbGXGG99O8ce3a0sPiw83rGwFbK6va4 zKjfXISpm3lgEu2R+ZDe0Y+GWYlUsSzn2qIqdKAnbcfKZC7dAWDT89Dy3oTCmN1QuZJ1 +B4jpdw38v55So91znS7oiYZXIvM6tazgR9rQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DJP+IEMGDsgCa0fwiWPMsl862ZGoD7WIuK7Jm9gpwPlFHD0rHtLM/sKAvgYGfbBRWa oHxUYrTuHsVmOekiE3f/jApD9sjMwBX2XmPeVYpckCH3qCZnFZ2XvFYJjJbplK2O3Z1R 5bDsgqhVrkkznAIduDsrEDjvTEYeWiVs7OQ1E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.137 with SMTP id e9mr3851494wef.141.1261625470200; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:31:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320912231816s58cb3f94l6b2927e82cb48cd4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320912231816s58cb3f94l6b2927e82cb48cd4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:31:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30912231931m19ef267bk7f5442637f9b6fe2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Type mismatch in key from map From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99cd7fdad23047b71119b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d99cd7fdad23047b71119b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think you meant.. KeyValueTextInputFormat. This is in a deprecated package. It even uses JobConf that's been deprecated. Is there an equivalent new class that's not deprecated? Otherwise, I will have to create the JobConf object just to use this class. In any case, I tried using it as follows (also a few other variations...) JobConf jobConf = new JobConf(); jobConf.setWorkingDirectory(new Path("myapp/output")); KeyValueTextInputFormat.addInputPath(jobConf, new Path("./part-r-00000")); But it keeps throwing this exception... Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: No input paths specified in job at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:186) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:241) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.writeNewSplits(JobClient.java:885) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:779) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:432) What's the right way to use this class? Thanks for your help. On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > It seems the value type of your first job's output is Text, but I guess > your > second job's InputFormat is TextInputFormat, the key type of > TextInputFormat > is LongWritable. So you will get the Type mismatch error message. I suggest > you use KeyValueInputFormat as your second job's InputFormat. > > > Jeff Zhang > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would like to feed a file created by one job as an input to the next > job. > > When I do that, I get: > > > > java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected > > org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:807) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.write(MapTask.java:504) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskInputOutputContext.write(TaskInputOutputContext.java:80) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:124) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:583) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > > > > > > The first job does: context.write(key, value) - in a loop. This creates > a > > file (/part-r-00000) that contains something like this... > > > > 1 1,2,4*6*,1** > > 1 2,2,6*,4** > > 2 1,6,2*3*5*6*7*8*,1** > > 2 2,6,3*5*6*7*8*,2** > > & so on... > > > > Now in my second job I do: > > > > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(inFile)); > > > > Where inFile is set to the one created above (/part-r-00000) > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? Please help. Thanks. > > > --0016e6d99cd7fdad23047b71119b-- From general-return-852-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 24 04:01:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58513 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 04:01:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2009 04:01:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 40270 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 04:01:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40181 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2009 04:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40171 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2009 04:01:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:01:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:01:47 +0000 Received: by pwi20 with SMTP id 20so5208983pwi.29 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:01:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/7PrIn7pw4nSdVX7cKRi9o24DOa0zm/Y+05jnw3OsQw=; b=pkGLjMtL19p//NvUij4wBF5vUjCDPOVOeUzyl+NmQLjoEozWbxphtnpdqWAyG1b8VJ ZWYZGzErnP86bkdfgizKljcfw2X9bjpmdLYKub2RGUKgV3cHn5Q+VUmFRPUAL5YMGKlq tMLQlIDd0Scg5JrnvaYK54eLvqkld7HK4bzZg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eVnM3kMuE9hWyXiqx15+z+EE9XJjOcdnIcLkBM9kntrcXHkl7glWYcHfp6f5FqkCwS VrG6auafTPw2Cu2s0QwWDUzCJLLY8xzgRP33IpCswug69perHdK9RmxxsSjDpWi2xSmy NWm43tPKeTzjJmEGmfvZR31eB2Z4Hb++2j+zQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.61.33 with SMTP id j33mr6825136wfa.236.1261627285826; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:01:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30912231931m19ef267bk7f5442637f9b6fe2@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320912231816s58cb3f94l6b2927e82cb48cd4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30912231931m19ef267bk7f5442637f9b6fe2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:01:25 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320912232001s39bd8bc1t920358d6dd9c439b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Type mismatch in key from map From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e1f93d35f08f047b717e04 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e1f93d35f08f047b717e04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The KeyValueTextInputFormat is deprecated in hadoop 0.20.1, and there's a new one in trunk for new api. I think you should use part-00000 rather than part-r-00000, then you will get no IOException, there's output file name change between different hadoop versions. Jeff Zhang On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you meant.. KeyValueTextInputFormat. This is in a deprecated > package. It even uses JobConf that's been deprecated. Is there an > equivalent new class that's not deprecated? Otherwise, I will have to > create the JobConf object just to use this class. > > In any case, I tried using it as follows (also a few other variations...) > > JobConf jobConf = new JobConf(); > jobConf.setWorkingDirectory(new Path("myapp/output")); > KeyValueTextInputFormat.addInputPath(jobConf, new > Path("./part-r-00000")); > > But it keeps throwing this exception... > > Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: No input paths specified in > job > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:186) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:241) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.writeNewSplits(JobClient.java:885) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:779) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:432) > > > What's the right way to use this class? Thanks for your help. > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > It seems the value type of your first job's output is Text, but I guess > > your > > second job's InputFormat is TextInputFormat, the key type of > > TextInputFormat > > is LongWritable. So you will get the Type mismatch error message. I > suggest > > you use KeyValueInputFormat as your second job's InputFormat. > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I would like to feed a file created by one job as an input to the next > > job. > > > When I do that, I get: > > > > > > java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected > > > org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:807) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.write(MapTask.java:504) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskInputOutputContext.write(TaskInputOutputContext.java:80) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:124) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:583) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > > > > > > > > > The first job does: context.write(key, value) - in a loop. This > creates > > a > > > file (/part-r-00000) that contains something like this... > > > > > > 1 1,2,4*6*,1** > > > 1 2,2,6*,4** > > > 2 1,6,2*3*5*6*7*8*,1** > > > 2 2,6,3*5*6*7*8*,2** > > > & so on... > > > > > > Now in my second job I do: > > > > > > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(inFile)); > > > > > > Where inFile is set to the one created above ( dir>/part-r-00000) > > > > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > --001636e1f93d35f08f047b717e04-- From general-return-853-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 28 07:34:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9925 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2009 07:34:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Dec 2009 07:34:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 63651 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2009 07:34:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63547 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2009 07:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12832 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2009 05:31:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40,MIME_BASE64_TEXT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhaohui821106@qq.com designates 119.147.10.235 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s0907; t=1261978234; bh=hvDP5vrsbk/HuEaRYeBAznQzxEcMZBASwCu9BCMyWxo=; h=X-QQ-ThreadID:X-Originating-IP:X-QQ-mid:X-QQ-STYLE:From:To:Sender: Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date: X-Priority:Message-ID:X-QQ-MIME:X-Mailer:X-QQ-Mailer; b=hbiCikVLUkGnwRZPMdcqA41bNtrr+QYi3f83sd0Lod6+DM/zNJwr/JYRIapAFmiY3 Y3qgZyAKj0b4flXrxLn26Uv2j4a/5a41ftjskm4Zq0GNN6t6v+n13MqsvYjqJxD X-QQ-ThreadID:WZR33xsnvE,0 X-Originating-IP: 61.187.225.243 X-QQ-mid:webmail374t1261978233t9717 X-QQ-STYLE: From: "=?gbk?B?z/LI1b/7?=" To: "=?gbk?B?Z2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw==?=" Sender: zhaohui821106@qq.com Subject: about the big file! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_4B384279_09602518_0FA400AC" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:30:33 +0800 X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x ------=_NextPart_4B384279_09602518_0FA400AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tINStyrzTyrz+IC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0KICC3orz+ yMs6ICLP8sjVv/siPDI2ODYyNjE1QHFxLmNvbT47DQogt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMDnE6jEy1MIy OMjVKNDHxtrSuykg1tDO5zE6MjgNCiDK1bz+yMs6ICJnZW5lcmFsIjxnZW5lcmFsQGhhZG9v cC5hcGFjaGUub3JnPjsgDQogDQog1vfM4jogYWJvdXQgdGhlIGJpZyBmaWxlIQ0KDQogIA0K IGhlbGxvLGkgaGF2ZSBhIHF1ZXN0aW9uIGFib3V0IHRoZSBiaWcgZmlsZXMhDQogaGRmcyBp cyBhaW1lZCBhdCBwcm9jZXNzaW5nIGJpZyBmaWxlIUJ1dCBtb3N0IHdlYiBmaWxlIGlzIHNt YWxsLG9mZmVuIGxlc3MgdGhhbiBhIHR5cGljYWwgYmxvY2sgc2l6ZSB3aGljaCBpcyA2NE1C LHNvIGkgd2FudCB0byBrbm93IHdoZXJlIGRvIHRoZSBiaWcgZmlsZXMgY29tZSBmcm9tIUlm IHRoZXkgYXJlIG1lcmdlZCBmcm9tIG1hbnkgc21hbGwgZmlsZXMgb3IgdGhlIGFjaGl2ZWQg ZmlsZXM/DQogSSB3aXNoIHRvIGdldCB5b3VyIHJlcGx5IGFzIHNvb24gYXMgcG9zc2libGUh ICAgVGhhbmtzIHZlcnkgbXVjaCE= ------=_NextPart_4B384279_09602518_0FA400AC-- From general-return-854-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 28 07:36:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10150 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2009 07:36:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Dec 2009 07:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 66235 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2009 07:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66174 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2009 07:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66164 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2009 07:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:36:21 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so7577708pxi.2 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:36:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gp9VH4kRKBvSNGhPE+YxwjX7r2+aGvxyi+q84HBevuw=; b=QR0gYQSrzMuPpx96kBgxs/uDM+9VF9xnbOcisSJGIkd1j7/HdtPheuAsIxaannu9a9 H3ymhP3dMg3ZjyimohNadN0jLoTISWDsn1UktSbC6YHgf5TXmpxN3XQ0lK1bWUb2n5Wi SjoPHb9xleB5Z4oUGNxzNDTh3+qhU+tI/wpBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T3HRszMWr1cS0tS12aJa/do9/+P+uzaxIax62kTI72v1XxjwyPX2fkVWFJhSMf4SdZ h6dBbcZoerd02kf2YLHIZtKOvnxV0wUH98VFdOcsY741DI9WPm+39jdqznakLpCxAsPR Q7PAP0m4P9ouzbYRLBG8xpERNMfhKLfSotJCM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.112.5 with SMTP id p5mr9636511wam.223.1261985760458; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:36:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:36:00 -0800 Message-ID: <78568af10912272336w514c1c12n7f95efc28179bc9c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about the big file! From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Think... logfiles. 2009/12/27 =CF=F2=C8=D5=BF=FB : > ------------------ =D4=AD=CA=BC=D3=CA=BC=FE ------------------ > =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: "=CF=F2=C8=D5=BF=FB"<26862615@qq.com>; > =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2009=C4=EA12=D4=C228=C8=D5(=D0=C7=C6=DA=D2=BB)= =D6=D0=CE=E71:28 > =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: "general"; > > =D6=F7=CC=E2: about the big file! > > > hello,i have a question about the big files! > hdfs is aimed at processing big file!But most web file is small,offen le= ss than a typical block size which is 64MB,so i want to know where do the b= ig files come from!If they are merged from many small files or the achived = files? > I wish to get your reply as soon as possible! Thanks very much! From general-return-855-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 30 23:21:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92630 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2009 23:21:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Dec 2009 23:21:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24153 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2009 23:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23873 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2009 23:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23856 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2009 23:21:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:21:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [137.110.142.3] (HELO stonefish.nmfs.noaa.gov) (137.110.142.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:21:05 +0000 Received: from [161.55.17.81] by stonefish.nmfs.noaa.gov (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTPSA id <0KVH00D1SNIKHL30@stonefish.nmfs.noaa.gov> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:20:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:20:43 -0800 From: Roy Mendelssohn Subject: What is included in each download To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <63C88D50-5DD1-4A39-80D0-596BF9FD7E89@noaa.gov> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi All: I am new to what is in this Apache Project. When I go t http://hadoop.apache.org/index.html, a glaring omission, IMO, is any description of what contains what, and what I get if I do a download. Does Hadoop common contain hbase and mapreduce and hdfs, or do I need to install these separately, or what. I skimmed several of the starting documents, and they do not tell you that either. Same with the other components listed on that page. Any information on that would be greatly appreciated, -Roy M. ********************** "The contents of this message do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government or NOAA." ********************** Roy Mendelssohn Supervisory Operations Research Analyst NOAA/NMFS Environmental Research Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center 1352 Lighthouse Avenue Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097 e-mail: Roy.Mendelssohn@noaa.gov (Note new e-mail address) voice: (831)-648-9029 fax: (831)-648-8440 www: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov/ "Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill." "From those who have been given much, much will be expected" From general-return-856-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 31 19:18:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18405 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2009 19:18:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 2009 19:18:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 19310 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2009 19:18:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2009 19:18:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19216 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2009 19:18:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:18:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:18:25 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 25so1749807eya.23 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:18:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3Z3Gjq/FYnCom1vI5IJJz7jiFiPzO+e+FcVXdcuLlXo=; b=btJqjgnYoRxztbEDhKqDiPABhCkrpfQV9K3KoSf4CHPzahaJ3194xuW4L0aU/da4Gw fvhnj80NP8ANBN5wa5IhzrQRCdyfYupuYgze9+aOupUsyIcsRXdvjs/PscBNziZYYdyC WKuq+DoJ0Y3FFCLP0+TLgmGEEmUd+NZbzgq/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=holbw8H6SoS8s2FuP4ySXpivvQahjcz1jmFFvIxEPJVnjX6LH/OBizBJJlji/veUsn vERLD/1R4Iut+uYlSQd7+eepcpu16qqu4aqzxdaeK984RjdjwSyM38EWjUUtw1RYyT3y TzjJYm2D/Ekyt/iTMELMC0taoYuUxlm/D0zQ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.7 with SMTP id t7mr128618wee.122.1262287084025; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:18:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320912232001s39bd8bc1t920358d6dd9c439b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30912231622v3c40e2b6kbf1de21d7755b67b@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320912231816s58cb3f94l6b2927e82cb48cd4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30912231931m19ef267bk7f5442637f9b6fe2@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320912232001s39bd8bc1t920358d6dd9c439b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:18:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30912311118n484c1e73xf6139dace6f3ee27@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Type mismatch in key from map From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77cce3f7a82047c0b1d16 --0016e6d77cce3f7a82047c0b1d16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I tried using KeyValueTextInputFormat from the 'trunk' but I am getting the same error message (Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable) Not sure what you mean by "use part-00000". There's no file called part-00000. Anyway, for now I will just workaround this issue. New plan is this.... the first job will write to a new table in HBase and the 2nd job will use TableMapper to go thru each row. I was trying to avoid this because something tells me that this might be a bit slower than just using HDFS directly, but we shall see. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > The KeyValueTextInputFormat is deprecated in hadoop 0.20.1, and there's a > new one in trunk for new api. > I think you should use part-00000 rather than part-r-00000, then you will > get no IOException, there's output file name change between different > hadoop > versions. > > > Jeff Zhang > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think you meant.. KeyValueTextInputFormat. This is in a deprecated > > package. It even uses JobConf that's been deprecated. Is there an > > equivalent new class that's not deprecated? Otherwise, I will have to > > create the JobConf object just to use this class. > > > > In any case, I tried using it as follows (also a few other variations...) > > > > JobConf jobConf = new JobConf(); > > jobConf.setWorkingDirectory(new Path("myapp/output")); > > KeyValueTextInputFormat.addInputPath(jobConf, new > > Path("./part-r-00000")); > > > > But it keeps throwing this exception... > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: No input paths specified > in > > job > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:186) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:241) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.writeNewSplits(JobClient.java:885) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:779) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:432) > > > > > > What's the right way to use this class? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > It seems the value type of your first job's output is Text, but I guess > > > your > > > second job's InputFormat is TextInputFormat, the key type of > > > TextInputFormat > > > is LongWritable. So you will get the Type mismatch error message. I > > suggest > > > you use KeyValueInputFormat as your second job's InputFormat. > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to feed a file created by one job as an input to the > next > > > job. > > > > When I do that, I get: > > > > > > > > java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected > > > > org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:807) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.write(MapTask.java:504) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.TaskInputOutputContext.write(TaskInputOutputContext.java:80) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.map(Mapper.java:124) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:144) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:583) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > > > > > > > > > > > > The first job does: context.write(key, value) - in a loop. This > > creates > > > a > > > > file (/part-r-00000) that contains something like this... > > > > > > > > 1 1,2,4*6*,1** > > > > 1 2,2,6*,4** > > > > 2 1,6,2*3*5*6*7*8*,1** > > > > 2 2,6,3*5*6*7*8*,2** > > > > & so on... > > > > > > > > Now in my second job I do: > > > > > > > > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path(inFile)); > > > > > > > > Where inFile is set to the one created above ( > dir>/part-r-00000) > > > > > > > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d77cce3f7a82047c0b1d16-- From general-return-2094-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 01 00:05:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71580 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 00:05:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 00:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 36314 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 00:05:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36173 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 00:05:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36165 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2010 00:05:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:05:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hc.busy@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:05:22 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so7196943qwk.35 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:05:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=53xkH/W1LHy8bL9hJxGiOdIDWbcXUj8Y+/2WwRDWRQ8=; b=l4lzgVZKUVmlYZxR+cjzIdnJSvH7CDkH4+NKw2m5l0YVrr9RS1Pk/be69NclNkIBl9 FZ/BpgqCxMmsBaMe7so46ejPaTq3gwqV0VND+7xfegQoDFnUyhLKebn8q8PY1ILVy0s8 z2LVLRcj1z49MfOANiMXlcoAmyEoiz0AIu59c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cHwvu04fdXHpGcNFnVEu3yTLeD6RVRrGgqV0xvJHOt9YP7Jreg/7eEp0SawwSyv5sJ uGsswaCPHi3XD1XyD33Ip5pgysEnjNNynAC3WjHhun9GR/oXCTkgu/bMcALx8axvDk+Z Y9tQqGOyYVfn/q8KT6yHEUQh552W1EcyD01g8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.223.198 with SMTP id il6mr4789379qcb.50.1283299501241; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.40.140 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:05:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <351A8FBE-528C-4352-8D14-3AC913836336@yahoo-inc.com> References: <71D87762-A95B-434D-9FF6-8627AF65790A@yahoo-inc.com> <71E1E01A-5389-48C2-9A43-9A8BD6B87A2A@yahoo-inc.com> <351A8FBE-528C-4352-8D14-3AC913836336@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:05:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pig to become a TLP From: hc busy To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630eb25e97b8c048f2772e3 --00163630eb25e97b8c048f2772e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Neat! Congratulations, again, on the solidarity ! I feel that Pig is one of the more reliable and mature ways to program Hadoop. I look forward to seeing more a$$ kicking of all the other systems. :-) On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:41 PM, hc busy wrote: > > +1, Congrads on the near unanimous vote for progress. >> >> Btw, can somebody tell me what the change was from March when this was >> discussed and now? At that time, every one seem to have felt that Pig can >> only handle Hadoop as backend and doesn't make sense for it to become a >> TLP >> by itself. In fact, I remember a ticket to remove the possibility of a >> different backend. What did I miss? >> > > I can only speak for myself, but in the original discussion thread on > pig-dev (http://bit.ly/byD7L8 ) I discussed why I changed my vote over the > course of the last few months. > > > >> >> 1.) Technically, what developments/or future plans make it a separate >> project from Hadoop? (Other backend support?) >> > > While we still want to design Pig and Pig Latin in such a way that there > may be separate implementations that do not run on Hadoop, nothing in this > regard has changed in the last few months. What did change is that I (and I > think others) realized that being connected technically to Hadoop does not > mean we need to be connected in our governance. > > > 2.) What are the non-technical factors that changed since March that made >> this vote possible? (Donation from large company?) >> > > Apache does not require that projects raise any finances. Pig is (as it > has been) supported by the contributions of those choose to work on it and > those who are paid to work on it. > > > 3.) Can I make tax deductible contributions to the Apache Pig Project ? >> > > Wow, that's a huge vote of confidence. Thanks. But no. Contributions to > Pig can be made (as before) in code, documentation, user feedback, etc. You > can donate money to Apache itself, which goes to support the infrastructure > for Pig and all Apache projects. For more info see > http://apache.org/foundation/support-apache.html (I have no idea if that > is tax deductible or not.) > > Alan. > > --00163630eb25e97b8c048f2772e3-- From general-return-2095-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 01 02:17:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15510 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 02:17:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 02:17:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 18871 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 02:17:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18761 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 02:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18751 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2010 02:17:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:17:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:17:48 +0000 Received: from deimos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66F382C8 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:17:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by deimos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:17:27 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:17:25 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:17:26 -0400 Subject: RE: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Topic: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Thread-Index: ActIH0J+vIZx/8HOQvuTgGChZ4b1ZABXHc2w Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks! Added the line and it worked :) -----Original Message----- From: Angus He [mailto:angushe@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:41 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster Did the Job.setJarByClass get called? If not, just add it and take another try. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Thanks. I had tried running the command as you suggested but got a ClassN= otFoundException exception(for the mapper class) in the task trackers. I di= d a > > bin/hadoop jar /root/myjob.jar > > (Already had the main class defined in manifest) > > There is probably something else that I am doing wrong. > > Appreciate your help. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani [mailto:cpbhagtani@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 10:40 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Deploying my job jar on hadoop cluster > > Deepika, > > You just have to run the following command on any of the cluster node > > HADOOP_HOME/bin/hadoop jar > > this command will automatically copy the jar on all the tasktrackers. > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Deepika Khera wro= te: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to deploy my map reduce job jar on the Hadoop cluster. I've alway= s >> done that by doing the following - >> >> 1. Copying the job jar to all datanodes >> 2. Having the job jar on the hadoop classpath on all machines. >> >> Isn't hadoop capable of copying over the job jar to all machines in the >> cluster? This is what I read (that job tracker copies the job jar, etc) = , >> but if I don't do the above the task trackers cannot find the job. I kno= w I >> am missing something. >> >> Could someone please let me know how I can run my job without having to >> copy it over all machines in the cluster? >> >> Thanks, >> Deepika >> > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. > --=20 Regards Angus From general-return-2096-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 02 18:54:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16141 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 18:54:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 18:54:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 3038 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 18:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2932 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 18:54:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2924 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2010 18:54:26 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:54:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of palobob@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:54:04 +0000 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so449163pzk.35 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:53:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BsbMVB+GzVw7JnDS76/ZLXPznNj924W9ufiGl05LG8s=; b=ZHxZ0fdUYlN/qI9eixqyvrqA2M7VE4CirBW4X3FoJ2BSKvokI802jvsB/PL/kpeZdF KQ3g5E2bFShp2uU4tPn2YKPZiebyaydAW/cZJauCK5Fa7qaiXMz3cBnenCrFRsxv1eEL c2QUQNWlHcbKz5qbeI0Y41h48WNlGGbD/Yj3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cAFcKNWddzXUvqZjLjaVHEBTL66cxxCc419pGh8u0YfY29EIBeWzki3MJrZUw790mP tTiIhSEZBifrza/KpRRB5UjYH0nilku8XtVOB4/+sEyLlUwlaN8wZjS4ZAkjR6cOhbi4 8n8ssVX7+QgoXcerRgaBrMDphYFWgk6ykGq7k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.131.6 with SMTP id e6mr85664wad.90.1283453610502; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.106.7 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 11:53:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:53:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: apache commons configuration From: Bob Li To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c5c0d8afffe048f4b5407 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364c5c0d8afffe048f4b5407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi experts, For hadoop 0.20.2, we have following task tracker configuration mapred.local.dir /data/mapred/local It seems not what I expected -- the directory /tmp/hadoop-user/mapred/local was used. Any suggestion? Thanks, Bob On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > For some recent discussion, see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6910 > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 24/08/10 10:43, Thomas Koch wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> just out of curiosity: Is there any particular reason, why Hadoop > projects > >> or > >> ZooKeeper do not use apache commons configuration[1]? > >> I'm just evaluating it for an internal project. Would you recommend it > or > >> not? > >> I imagine, that it could help to make projects configurable either via > XML > >> or > >> INI files. Some people may prefer one or the other. > >> > >> [1] http://commons.apache.org/configuration/ > >> > > > > Someone's discussed it, I'm against because (a) there's a lot of > historical > > configuration stuff in there, (b) ini files are less flexible than XML, > (c) > > neither of them are very dynamic. when the NN goes down and you want the > DNs > > to reconnect to a different host, how do you do that when all data is > read > > at start time? > > > > > > > --0016364c5c0d8afffe048f4b5407-- From general-return-2097-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 02 19:03:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18274 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 19:03:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 19:03:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13085 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 19:03:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13027 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 19:03:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13017 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2010 19:03:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:03:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:03:22 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=QWlVDSxM5NrbKFRB9vuSGD637/HQChPMGJ+v8toiRmrFq7eAOv9PzX6V B9wns6vnGy0/pOxvKK/LwcEX4df+SoppPuFRT6VOVUMpO5+f4XTghQxyq 4TVGLZeWhxDTW6c; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1283454202; x=1314990202; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20apache=20commons=20configuration|Date: =20Thu,=202=20Sep=202010=2019:03:00=20+0000|Message-ID: =20 |To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding: =20quoted-printable|Content-ID:=20<523ae60e-5eb4-44b4-bd8 2-691f62891255>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20<2 01008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro>=0D=0A=20<4C739DD0.80505 02@apache.org>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=zjbU8KKqcb+aeGJ4qNZUAJBdhPfGZb1ckt+V8UlRSQc=; b=r2YJwvKThcv6qOMwQCPsr0iSKpsziLtNvH4GUcTovi+VDtTh7fETD1it RXwe7GudHPmbQfjhj+oc6OrvVFtPkIDGPVrRftCmDWJ3iFBJC4ozICJpp wva3uJcBMQjgSEP; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,309,1280732400"; d="scan'208";a="15106475" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:03:01 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: apache commons configuration Thread-Topic: apache commons configuration Thread-Index: AQHLQ3EZ+5DRkOEu4Uyw2bXTXlOm8JLw23gAgAFznYCADT+mAIAAAqcA Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 19:03:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <201008241143.46918.thomas@koch.ro> <4C739DD0.8050502@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <523ae60e-5eb4-44b4-bd82-691f62891255> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sep 2, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Bob Li wrote: > Hi experts, >=20 > For hadoop 0.20.2, we have following task tracker configuration > > mapred.local.dir > /data/mapred/local > >=20 > It seems not what I expected -- the directory /tmp/hadoop-user/mapred/loc= al > was used. >=20 > Any suggestion? Config problems like this seem to usually be traced back to broken XML form= atting prior to this entry or the property being in the wrong file (in this= case, it should be in mapred-site.xml). From general-return-2098-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 07 13:53:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76254 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2010 13:53:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2010 13:53:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 68830 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 13:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68459 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 13:53:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68451 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2010 13:53:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:53:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:53:45 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A74F6BB9F for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C86433A.6020703@crs4.it> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:50:50 +0200 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100727 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Pydoop 0.3.6 released Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everybody, We are pleased to announce that Pydoop (http://pydoop.sourceforge.net) 0.3.6 is out. Pydoop is a Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop, built upon the C++ Pipes and the C libhdfs APIs, that allows to write full-fledged MapReduce applications with HDFS access. The main changes with respect to 0.3.6_rc2 are the following: * Pydoop is now released under the Apache License, Version 2.0 * A "Pydoop for Dumbo Users" section has been added to the docs * Several bugs have been fixed Links: * download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydoop/files * full release notes: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pydoop/index.php?title=Release_Notes Happy pydooping, Simone -- Simone Leo Distributed Computing group Advanced Computing and Communications program CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simleo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-2099-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 08 21:49:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65748 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2010 21:49:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2010 21:49:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 43680 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 21:49:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43526 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 21:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43518 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2010 21:49:34 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:49:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.122.43.183] (HELO metis.rz1.connectline.net) (212.122.43.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:49:10 +0000 Received: from metis.rz1.connectline.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by metis.rz1.connectline.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536ECE128 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:48:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zeus.rz1.connectline.net (zeus.rz1.connectline.net [212.122.43.181]) by metis.rz1.connectline.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:48:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.connectline.de (mail.connectline.de [212.122.43.178]) by zeus.rz1.connectline.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E432380014 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:48:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Teresa Wingfield Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-19-732647816 Subject: Support Engineer Job Opening at Datameer Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:48:45 -0700 Message-Id: <8FB856F1-B447-41E0-9C3C-E3C67EDBA553@datameer.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-19-732647816 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Datameer, a provider of big data analytics built on Apache Hadoop, is = looking for a Support Engineer to provide technical assistance to = customers and to help diagnose and resolve customer support requests. If = you're interested in big data analytics and Hadoop, have strong = technical, communication and troubleshooting skills, and are passionate = about making customers successful, we would like to talk to you. This position is located in San Mateo, CA. If interested, please visit = http://www.datameer.com/about/careers.html to obtain a detailed job = description and application information.=20 Sincerely, Teresa Wingfield Vice President, Marketing Datameer 650-286-9100= --Apple-Mail-19-732647816-- From general-return-2100-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 14:07:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1220 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 14:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 14:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 81524 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 14:07:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81026 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 14:07:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81005 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 14:07:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:07:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:07:26 +0000 Received: from crt-01-tr.neofonie.de ([91.213.91.28] helo=essen.neofonie.priv) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ov9gX-0003Bd-Ap for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:07:05 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:01:49 +0200 From: Isabel Drost To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Support Engineer Job Opening at Datameer Message-ID: <20100913160149.77251ea3@essen.neofonie.priv> In-Reply-To: <8FB856F1-B447-41E0-9C3C-E3C67EDBA553@datameer.com> References: <8FB856F1-B447-41E0-9C3C-E3C67EDBA553@datameer.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.14.4; x86_64-http://packman.links2linux.de-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Teresa, On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 Teresa Wingfield wrote: > Datameer, a provider of big data analytics built on Apache Hadoop, is > looking for a Support Engineer to provide technical assistance to > customers and to help diagnose and resolve customer support requests. > If you're interested in big data analytics and Hadoop, have strong > technical, communication and troubleshooting skills, and are > passionate about making customers successful, we would like to talk > to you. Just a hint - are you aware of the jobs@apache.org mailing list? Maybe it makes sense to post the job offer there as well? Cheers, Isabel From general-return-2101-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 14:25:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5933 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 14:25:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 14:25:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 13008 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 14:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12558 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 14:25:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12550 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 14:25:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:25:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of david.g.boney@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:25:15 +0000 Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so2749076ywf.35 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=rUZjowNgaLm8zU+pAemgQ9km+HnbrGFVJQVFq6Ix4rg=; b=TXkJiNk0n9OgtDvouXAhxWYuhhajdXpw/ULf7khWQmLDoropp75uIrGgMF5Ui7cgx5 5vHEUSPTUXLPqB7nK4BnbzgeKhVLJDyZ1RTPR9QzN7mAheNtCD/U+S6P+oGgYF0m035c d5zHYLB4NywWgbooQ/WVaDCeCpn/XEq1UQdz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=mJZRZekJaH8GwyICfm+Z4Tr3l8U8PR6PY/MiDkCFtBCAGECmLmsTrCpJ0oENZoMaYg T8vz1GYiKuDKrYfhKC31/E/VOGJCXGa0ZE6uEz1XD65NvbyCSs00W2oz5EmiP06iD554 WprFZLTCkSwxAx979hhdLdNALb9fFd0d/iPDg= Received: by 10.151.148.18 with SMTP id a18mr1299276ybo.299.1284387894054; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.230] ([64.129.157.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w24sm3429250ybk.1.2010.09.13.07.24.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Support Engineer Job Opening at Datameer From: "David G. Boney" In-Reply-To: <20100913160149.77251ea3@essen.neofonie.priv> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:24:50 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8FB856F1-B447-41E0-9C3C-E3C67EDBA553@datameer.com> <20100913160149.77251ea3@essen.neofonie.priv> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Would it be possible to have a mailing list for hadoop jobs, a = jobs@hadoop.apache.org? My observation is that the skills for using = Hadoop for big data analysis are more specialized, particularly in math, = stat, and machine learning. ------------- Sincerely, David G. Boney david.g.boney@gmail.com http://www.sonicartifacts.com On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Isabel Drost wrote: >=20 > Hello Teresa, >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 Teresa Wingfield wrote: >> Datameer, a provider of big data analytics built on Apache Hadoop, is >> looking for a Support Engineer to provide technical assistance to >> customers and to help diagnose and resolve customer support requests. >> If you're interested in big data analytics and Hadoop, have strong >> technical, communication and troubleshooting skills, and are >> passionate about making customers successful, we would like to talk >> to you. >=20 > Just a hint - are you aware of the jobs@apache.org mailing list? Maybe > it makes sense to post the job offer there as well? >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Isabel From general-return-2102-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 16:09:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53940 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 16:09:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 16:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 88582 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 16:09:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88503 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 16:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88495 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 16:09:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:09:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:08:55 +0000 Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so2799945yxn.35 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.232.1 with SMTP id e1mr4585033anh.15.1284394113857; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:08:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.156.212 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:08:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:08:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: hadoop.job.ugi backwards compatibility To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1f63e877560490264e59 --0016368e1f63e877560490264e59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I wanted to start a (hopefully short) discussion around the treatment of the hadoop.job.ugi configuration in Hadoop 0.22 and beyond (as well as the secure 0.20 branch). In the current security implementation, the following incompatible changes have been made even for users who are sticking with "simple" security. 1) Groups resolution happens on the server side, where it used to happen on the client. Thus, all Hadoop users must exist on the NN/JT machines in order for group mapping to succeed (or the user must write a custom group mapper). 2) The hadoop.job.ugi parameter is ignored - instead the user has to use the new UGI.createRemoteUser("foo").doAs() API, even in simple security. I'm curious whether the general user community feels these are acceptable breaking changes. The potential solutions I can see are: For 1) Add a configuration like hadoop.security.simple.groupmappinglocation -> "client" or "server". If it's set to "client", the group mapping would continue to happen as it does in prior versions on the client side. For 2) If security is "simple", we can have the FileSystem and JobClient constructors check for this parameter. If it's set, and there is no Subject object associated with the current AccessControlContext, wrap the creation of the RPC proxy with the correct doAs() call. Although security is obviously an absolute necessity for many organizations, I know of a lot of people who have small clusters and small teams who don't have any plans to deploy it. For these people, I imagine the above backward-compatibility layer may be very helpful as they adopt the next releases of Hadoop. If we don't want to support these options going forward, we can of course emit deprecation warnings when they are in effect and remove the compatibility layer in the next major release. Any thoughts here? Do people often make use of the hadoop.job.ugi variable to such an extent that this breaking change would block your organization from upgrading? Thanks -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016368e1f63e877560490264e59-- From general-return-2103-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 16:32:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61092 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 16:32:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 16:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 23442 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 16:32:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23146 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 16:32:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23138 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 16:32:22 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:32:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:31:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 60870 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 16:31:37 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:31:37 +0000 Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so2343035pvc.35 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr209305wad.43.1284395496654; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.147.2 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:31:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:31:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop.job.ugi backwards compatibility From: "Owen O'Malley" To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Moving the discussion over to the more appropriate mapreduce-dev. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > 1) Groups resolution happens on the server side, where it used to happen on > the client. Thus, all Hadoop users must exist on the NN/JT machines in order > for group mapping to succeed (or the user must write a custom group mapper). There is a plugin that performs the group lookup. See HADOOP-4656. There is no requirement for having the user accounts on the NN/JT although that is the easiest approach. It is not recommended that the users be allowed to login. I think it is important that turning security on and off doesn't drastically change the semantics or protocols. That will become much much harder to support downstream. > 2) The hadoop.job.ugi parameter is ignored - instead the user has to use the > new UGI.createRemoteUser("foo").doAs() API, even in simple security. User code that counts on hadoop.job.ugi working will be horribly broken once you turn on security. Turning on and off security should not involve testing all of your applications. It is unfortunate that we ever used the configuration value as the user, but continuing to support it will make our user's code much much more brittle. -- Owen From general-return-2104-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 21:33:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73635 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 21:33:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 21:33:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 38875 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 21:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38791 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 21:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38777 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 21:33:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.23] (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:33:22 +0000 Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A81AF325F7 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:33:02 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7b43ae00000547d-61-4c8e988ebd7a Received: from isdevmars002.apple.com (isdevmars002.apple.com [17.216.20.69]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id BA.0F.21629.E889E8C4; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:33:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Rahul Malviya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Multiples Jobs Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:33:02 -0700 Message-Id: <5CE1636B-E0F6-4B43-B9E4-FEA435B78F9B@apple.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Hi, I am running Pig jobs on Hadoop cluster. I just wanted to know whether I can run multiple jobs on hadoop cluster = simultaneously. Currently when i start two jobs on hadoop they run in a serial fashion. Is there a way to run N jobs simultaneously on hadoop ? Thanks, Rahul= From general-return-2105-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 13 22:51:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97399 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 22:51:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 22:51:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 57834 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 22:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57742 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2010 22:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57734 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2010 22:51:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:51:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:51:16 +0000 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4736456fxm.35 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=qiOyA7tfOlYikcfsRuX8+KjdZIKjsLkCUVt8ZEZOsAI=; b=JJKdE7dfJzKhl7aLnO8LFZZKlC7OFG4gCUDLSonk9kq/xBImnNQjPzvOwKTzva09kB ffwhYn971y6eX1z4/vAIPbC0w0Kn6UwMmndqS39qgaqnumYsff7bCcGxngp9uH/ERgbA 8L8F4F7sYXLnLS3tCVHicbKo0iysvUcLny6KM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uETrnsGehY+Fv+4XOjT+3DuZ3+460U7OpPXPrO1c4yX6wuYuEmtXho0ZyGstMNk/uF gG+eD6cliP0WfHjWcHgbqUxZ2E1xQMCrwsJ/X8vwUi+EK8Lk1l3F5vwXOPL2c9vnBGpH ZXX0tA0V0PvJGoTlz4tMikoKrGioehiAFxnwo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.126.79 with SMTP id b15mr3414130fas.88.1284418255600; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: anthony.urso@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.103.83 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5CE1636B-E0F6-4B43-B9E4-FEA435B78F9B@apple.com> References: <5CE1636B-E0F6-4B43-B9E4-FEA435B78F9B@apple.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pWdLnGaPJWfJ03BEppy719POhQU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiples Jobs From: Anthony Urso To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Try the fair scheduler, it will seem more simultaneous than the default scheduler. http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.21.0/fair_scheduler.html On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Rahul Malviya wrote: > Hi, > > I am running Pig jobs on Hadoop cluster. > > I just wanted to know whether I can run multiple jobs on hadoop cluster simultaneously. > > Currently when i start two jobs on hadoop they run in a serial fashion. > > Is there a way to run N jobs simultaneously on hadoop ? > > Thanks, > Rahul From general-return-2106-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 14 17:25:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13937 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 17:25:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 17:25:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 89540 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 17:25:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89394 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 17:25:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89386 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2010 17:25:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmalviya@apple.com designates 17.254.13.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.254.13.22] (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:25:00 +0000 Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BF1A88E49F for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:24:40 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7b8eae0000035ac-40-4c8fafd8df63 Received: from isdevmars002.apple.com (isdevmars002.apple.com [17.216.20.69]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id BB.E5.13740.8DFAF8C4; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:24:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Rahul Malviya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Number of Mappers Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:24:39 -0700 Message-Id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Hi=20 I am using Pig jobs to run on Hadoop but always it runs 4 mappers = simultaneously.=20 How can I increase the number of simultaneous mappers to run ? What config do I have to change ? Thanks, Rahul= From general-return-2107-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 14 19:34:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64371 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 19:34:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 19:34:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 59489 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 19:34:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59357 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 19:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59349 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2010 19:34:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:34:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter_raeth@juno.com designates 64.136.55.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.136.55.15] (HELO outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com) (64.136.55.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:34:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juno.com; s=alpha; t=1284492828; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0; h=From:Date:To:Subject:Message-Id:Content-Type; b=f5OndazxxCBXjHh+cUpXlWL/VcbGSRz30jBm2tc9nUU45lpTGUb7CknBYJykJSTy5 OHaAqYvBTKdX0ShFECyLmueQ7aFH4xhutGA7BmSsw5Nw4g2IQoaCA7r508s01kJFxV /KbGD20YrEHFbXLJ0lObFvyNYRDSJTJ6YFVKqMrE= X-UOL-TAGLINE: true Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (webmail05.vgs.untd.com [10.181.12.145]) by smtpout03.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABGJ9VRTAEAKU7A for (sender ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:33:05 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: IXkAfFukJf2tQJaX29ekrgrTDOH9knyenCwaJABJqMo9jwVrxl5+4Q== Received: (from peter_raeth@juno.com) by webmail05.vgs.untd.com (jqueuemail) id QPTJT496; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:32:59 PDT Received: from [140.31.142.102] by webmail05.vgs.untd.com with HTTP: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:31:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [140.31.142.102] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "peter_raeth@juno.com" Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:31:45 GMT To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: C++ Record Readers and Writers X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Message-Id: <20100914.153145.10299.1@webmail05.vgs.untd.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-UNTD-BodySize: 228 X-ContentStamp: 2:1:1458885665 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.12.145|webmail05.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|peter_raeth@juno.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am searching for guidance on writing record readers and writers in C++. = All the books and Googled examples that I can find write examples in Jav= a. Can anyone give me a link to documentation on this topic? Thanks, Peter. ____________________________________________________________ Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25% If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4c8fcdf133f4ebb5618st03vuc From general-return-2108-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 15 01:22:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70485 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 01:22:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 01:22:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 41367 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 01:22:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41299 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 01:22:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41291 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2010 01:22:49 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:22:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:22:42 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so350400wwc.29 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LOx82NW9o3UM0hB7kbS16e0cUWxVSahsmZ3QbE87FYY=; b=wY65RwEihmnXm1g0cTgzcP/7iK82GIXk6yhnbvj0E1kgaOAWfGOfltns6XSik4Qce+ rD5R00w9K8fNPGw17+/cRPDbZSL/mZnO0mYzQaR6o0NfFi9YEISKiNF1KL0F6ynZV4rj gYHA+AXNci2NhI2DOX2W0bGKa5JAdXV/a2hmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yg5Z5it08nVimFD2CPKXTkbtOEGWi/dVz7jgDCQT+/zahQQRiX2XPuOstzLtzcChl0 9OJtcJIsOfsyuPwLPEGe8S1E1jKgK7euxRzmCY22307El367rVdKdxRNf83a9heZZiGq ReNgxnYd6jEQ4xnbeJ5mpW2QnF+zIZGXmlZOA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.235.104 with SMTP id t82mr4568473weq.103.1284513742078; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.163.5 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:22:22 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Number of Mappers From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Rahul, You can not determined set the mapper number as reducer number. The mapper number is determined by the your InputFormat. If you are using PigStorage, then the InputFormat is PigTextInputFormat which is a subclass of TextInputFormat. You can refer TextInputFormat.getSplits() to see how it split the input. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Rahul Malviya wrote: > Hi > > I am using Pig jobs to run on Hadoop but always it runs 4 mappers simultaneously. > > How can I increase the number of simultaneous mappers to run ? > > What config do I have to change ? > > Thanks, > Rahul -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang From general-return-2109-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 15 07:50:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82867 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 07:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 07:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 50437 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 07:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49967 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 07:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49937 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2010 07:50:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:50:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:50:35 +0000 Received: from crt-01-tr.neofonie.de ([91.213.91.28] helo=essen.neofonie.priv) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ovmks-00032h-FG; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:50:10 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:44:45 +0200 From: Isabel Drost To: hadoopberlin@isabel-drost.de, user@mahout.apache.org, java-user@lucene.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, katta-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Martin Schmidt Subject: Apache Hadoop Get Together Berlin October 2010 - this time with a huge Mahout focus Message-ID: <20100915094445.58115636@essen.neofonie.priv> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.14.4; x86_64-http://packman.links2linux.de-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, this is to announce the next Apache Hadoop Get Together sponsored by JTeam (http://www.jteam.nl) that will take place in newthinking store in Berlin. When: October 7th, 5p.m. Where: Newthinking store Berlin As always there will be slots of 30min each for talks on your Hadoop topic. After each talk there will be a lot time to discuss. You can order drinks directly at the bar in the newthinking store. If you like, you can order pizza. We will go to Cafe Aufsturz after the event for some beer and something to eat. Talks scheduled so far: Max Heimel: "Hidden Markov Models for Apache Mahout" Abstract: In this talk I will present and discuss an implementation of a powerful statistical tool called Hidden Markov Models for the Apache Mahout project. Hidden Markov models allow to mathematically deduce the structure of an underlying - and unobservable - process based on the structure of the produced data. Hidden Markov Models are thus frequently applied in pattern recognition to deduce structures that are not directly observable. Examples for applications of Hidden Markov Models include the recognition of syllables in speech recordings, handwritten letter recognition and part-of-speech tagging. Sebastian Schelter: Distributed Itembased Collaborative Filtering with Apache Mahout" Abstract: Recommendation Mining helps users find items they like. A very popular way to implement this is by using Collaborative Filtering. This talk will give an introduction to an approach called Itembased Collaborative Filtering and explain Mahout's Map/Reduce based implementation of it. Please do indicate on Upcoming or on Xing if you are coming so we can more safely plan capacities. Updates to the event, a brief summary and videos will be posted on http://isabel-drost.de/hadoop JTeam is looking for Java developers and search enthusiasts. Check out their jobs page (http://www.jteam.nl/Jobs/Jobs.html) for more info! As always a big Thank You goes to newthinking store for providing the venue for free for our event. Looking forward to seeing you in Berlin as well, Isabel From general-return-2110-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 16 07:34:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60645 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 07:34:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 07:34:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 82226 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 07:34:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81765 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 07:34:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81755 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2010 07:34:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:34:31 +0000 Received: from 246-0.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.79.0.246] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ow8yq-0003MA-Ud; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:34:05 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: hadoopworld@cloudera.com, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Keysigning party at Hadoop World Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:33:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2334805.d7GfjuynQE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009160934.01127.thomas@koch.ro> --nextPart2334805.d7GfjuynQE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I'm the Debian maintainer of Hadoop, HBase and ZooKeeper. It's an issue for= =20 me, that the gpg keys used to sign the releases of these projects are norma= lly=20 not signed by anyone. So it is the same as if the releases would not be signed at all. Therefor I'd kindly like to ask you to offer a key signing party[1] at Hado= op=20 World. Unfortunately I'm from Switzerland and can't come to Hadoop World,=20 otherwise I'd have offered my assistance. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_signing_party Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro --nextPart2334805.d7GfjuynQE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJMkchfAAoJEAf8SJEEK6ZabQoP+gJddx8qZ9CGLiPi75s39Yz2 iRT9BaIjgo3V3DW8R8teUgGdFiiGmaG0IIBwPf1s0cbC7sqmVVONGVS8GD49zGNT q0dNMZePwBucybiOlVb65GJz/GBfLyTPLsfmS6LDWi05B1bYGmjZuVQ+6gB9268N 0Mung+fN5ShzX4CGx6Ptf7qd87/mUsOWQc47O9iAKomp4suiM+l8GkOGpCr2ciS2 /64F1IKHaHEafqq0bTnyU7ijnuTta2Y8kqPkN6adjb2d/B/yIIAUtieNbUS42/gp BYweyfI7DDfvUZlAuCNmfdnGjFE2/hA76zWHscbBLxfyjvSxDi4R73CeL4xMEd7l qvSJbLNoEw6k2j9ubGCxsA5z73QhelWnD9A9YMqMHQzEKufWkMHcpplPaYvFEfqn yMkN2Tty3eOZe3uOR2E9nDNWhp+ro2zjws+DUHu77IJoXjM5N8Q0pAgt2RQSGnKm e+VT4CFIQuhncWDWujXRb8dFRDeLAFZADY600e+w7VZ0vlAnmxqvgQUlpNlRepb5 zpcfazr6uKAlb9QH6IcIcoxI6gdRRt/UTX9UGnFxDTh73nVTgOScok+U09kjX7Gi ga50R1OgLu6ygQNY7W9JUCQhOt/HXYge9bYG3mZFRcExBSmuzjKZSIuVcoe4jz2g IWQm0I5ruwR1Qj99203h =j13B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2334805.d7GfjuynQE-- From general-return-2111-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 16 07:51:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63890 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 07:51:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 07:51:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4289 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 07:51:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3945 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 07:51:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3937 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2010 07:51:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:51:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clb991917@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:51:45 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1235608qyk.14 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hwHVl1mKv7o+LU1QCktLD23fwa+T2/uqafUOsp0+RY4=; b=gDNxQDkenPn7avyXQEGU++7Yc98/kvV2bNxQcH5BOEFSQzLTnSJ5CHgDmwvMpJ3kZ7 1BbR1bOoDDJepJAFN1bYCNjmRjVSldq8Q3EnwR9zcg+lmoCp10T0yz0OT2UWhbO9NBBn BgdtFe1JGtpi6F+EMaSBplpScjbvKxScOxyKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vWgDiLgjc/AaPUQ/c9ha/vnojJODUKzgk8o3teyUgwuu+ecoZ5l95oaM5SA1YsQ7Me xfUiQRH7iaYajFO9U0Etp9SO3sHO2fVL3YnmQPrbQ+jmz0SwqoCw5XRoPa4w4GMQ/4rO Mp1N3e2+De9PjTj8qK1Ia0jWJSbWzAf+tgPq8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.11.20 with SMTP id r20mr1959352qar.29.1284623484771; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.74.18 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:51:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: question about zip and extract jobs on hadoop From: vincent cai To: hadoopworld@cloudera.com, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdd647adec004905bb696 --0015175cdd647adec004905bb696 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all I'm just thinking about the elt extract jobs. is it possible to deploy that on hadoop cluster? if zip or unzip command can be run on hadoop datanodes , the network bandwidth will be the only bottleneck. Millions of zip files distributed to datanodes and zip or unzip. if possible make the super datanode by VM and SAN. That could be a "Super fast SAN" looks like the FileUtil class is containing some methods calling the linux gzip or untar command, but the hadoop fs manual is not providing that pls let me know if you have any comments . I'm just thinking about the possibility. thanks Best Regards Vincent Skype , cailibing1 --0015175cdd647adec004905bb696-- From general-return-2112-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 16 15:38:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27051 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 15:38:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 15:38:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 45938 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 15:38:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45574 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 15:38:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45566 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2010 15:38:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:38:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:38:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 26833 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2010 15:38:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:38:11 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so653577gxk.35 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:38:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.153.11 with SMTP id a11mr3814373ane.200.1284651490525; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.147.2 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:38:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009160934.01127.thomas@koch.ro> References: <201009160934.01127.thomas@koch.ro> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:38:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Keysigning party at Hadoop World From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org, thomas@koch.ro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > I'm the Debian maintainer of Hadoop, HBase and ZooKeeper. It's an issue for > me, that the gpg keys used to sign the releases of these projects are normally > not signed by anyone. > So it is the same as if the releases would not be signed at all. That has bothered me too. Since all of the developers who have rolled the releases are all in the Bay Area we should just use the upcoming HDFS & MapReduce contributor meeting to do this. That will at least show we trust each other. *grin* If there is a key signing party at Apache World, we can get into the larger Apache web of trust. In terms of getting into your web of trust, I'll contact you off list so that you can sign my key. For the record, my key is 3D0C92B9, which is visible in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS and the MIT key servers. > Therefor I'd kindly like to ask you to offer a key signing party[1] at Hadoop > World. Unfortunately I'm from Switzerland and can't come to Hadoop World, > otherwise I'd have offered my assistance. Let's get it done before then. -- Owen From general-return-2113-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 16 19:03:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4375 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 19:03:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 19:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 33735 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 19:02:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33461 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2010 19:02:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33444 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2010 19:02:56 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:02:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vicaya@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:02:33 +0000 Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so754875ywf.35 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=blHpcP5sjRCmWvktvmgvzx+sLPRji8hwOmikWsRPsWQ=; b=ow/r+ca1gYE7z2AwKcKtOXJ3ny6NjcbGJYaP0yfTQJsrH6ejQ80HyKIXkGzJhuvnz+ u2DEmR2A9ib0jlx8LvDlivCzai2TSx/qUtRoLg5YpT74eZNhvtj0w8e6GCtlMEu27xvB +pyiNSUE+NkLr+qNefe/6cPqx58EdaeSsXWbg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=TMAiJxu1n/aFwStM1x/L1A7pP3pSs3QpfXEQ+QQs5APsYcfYlyVN83tWd9qqWG1IYR 09X4SRlEqpd3nIAhq77bz416dbs5Wsjsdrnt/1+t69xIAtq87dqEjcVMMQOhCi+wca29 4jU0b1NYZ18ZmaqhTvWA26kZLQHndTtlGev5Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.251.7 with SMTP id d7mr312234mus.80.1284663731342; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.92.81 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:02:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Paths of evolution for Hadoop metrics From: Luke To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Working on the new metrics framework (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 and its sub-tasks), I'd like to invite some feedback from the community on how to evolve Hadoop metrics. Here is a quick summary of changes: 1. Simplified metrics instrumentation - Declarative annotations for common use cases - Narrower interfaces for advanced use cases - Automatic JMX access to all metrics - User code reduction in all cases 2. Extensive configuration and filtering options 3. Fix broken design/implementation for parallel/multi-backend use cases 4. More efficient (both space and time) design and implementation These benefits come with a necessity to break backward compatibility in both end-user (ops) visible config file changes and API changes for plugin developers. It seems to me that we have the following paths (targeting 0.22) to transition to the new metrics framework (no major issues found in Y's scale (a few thousand nodes) testing and being deployed to production.) 1. Remove the current o.a.h.metrics package completely and upgrade all metrics in Hadoop to use the new framework. - The current metrics APIs are marked as "Public/Evolving". - There are a few uses (notably HBase) outside Hadoop core (common, hdfs, mapreduce) - Upgrade/fix needs will be immediately apparent. - A simple band-aid would be an old hadoop metrics jar for external projects 2. Deprecate the current metrics package and upgrade all metrics in Hadoop to use the new framework. - Hadoop core would need to use new config files - External packages that depend on the old metrics framework continue working with old config files; without the benefits of the new framework - Potential config/api confusions and support issues 3. Depreciate the current metrics package and make all metrics work with both frameworks. - Framework switchable via config variable at startup time - External dependencies can work without modification - More dev work to support dual framework setup - More potential config/api confusions and support issues 3a. Same as 3. except with an option to run both framework at the same time with obviously more runtime overhead. I prefer the first path, obviously. OTOH, we could be convinced for other paths if there are real compelling reasons as well. __Luke From general-return-2114-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 17 06:44:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26420 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 06:44:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 06:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 54533 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 06:44:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52423 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 06:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52409 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 06:44:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [211.103.157.132] (HELO mail.oraro.net) (211.103.157.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:44:20 +0000 Received: from WangssPC ([222.182.25.188]) (authenticated user wangshisen@oraro.net) by mail.oraro.net; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:43:06 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?zfXKwMmt?= To: Cc: Subject: how to view the result of kmeans Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:42:31 +0800 Message-ID: <000301cb5633$94ae68d0$be0b3a70$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CB5676.A2D1A8D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: ActWM38X7d60YnG8SY6kWVFG2qA7pQ== Content-Language: zh-cn ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CB5676.A2D1A8D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi, I install the mahout and hadoop on SUSE Linux, and it works. I run the kmeans sample use command: hadoop fs -put synthetic_control.data testdata mahout org.apache.mahout.clustering.syntheticcontrol.kmeans.Job it run successfully here is the output files drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17229 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_2010091 71055_0002_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9165 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_2010091 71055_0002_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5749 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/canopies/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-0 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/clusters-0/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/clusters-0/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17479 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/clusters-0/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0003_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9283 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/clusters-0/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0003_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-0/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0004_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9283 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0004_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-1/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-2 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-2/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-2/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-2/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0005_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:00 /user/root/output/clusters-2/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0005_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-2/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0006_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0006_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-3/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-4 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-4/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-4/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-4/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0007_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:01 /user/root/output/clusters-4/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0007_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-4/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0008_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0008_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-5/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-6 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-6/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-6/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-6/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0009_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:02 /user/root/output/clusters-6/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0009_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-6/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0010_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0010_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-7/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-8 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-8/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-8/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-8/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0011_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-8/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0011_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:03 /user/root/output/clusters-8/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17481 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0012_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 9496 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100 9171055_0012_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 5757 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/clusters-9/part-00000 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/data drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:58 /user/root/output/data/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 10:58 /user/root/output/data/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 16671 2010-09-17 10:58 /user/root/output/data/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100917105 5_0001_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 6148 2010-09-17 10:58 /user/root/output/data/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_20100917105 5_0001_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 240672 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/data/part-00000 -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 242288 2010-09-17 10:59 /user/root/output/data/part-00001 drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/_logs drwxr-xr-x - root supergroup 0 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/_logs/history -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 17109 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_201009171 055_0013_conf.xml -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 6124 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/_logs/history/localhost_1284692116007_job_201009171 055_0013_root_mahout-examples-0.3.job -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 515948 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/part-00000 -rw-r--r-- 1 root supergroup 512632 2010-09-17 11:04 /user/root/output/points/part-00001 Then i download the output file to local use "hadoop fs -get output output" but when i view the result that kmeans created used the command: mahout clusterdump -s output/clusters-9 -p output/points it throws a exception: running on hadoop, using HADOOP_HOME=/usr/hadoop-0.20.2 and HADOOP_CONF_DIR=/usr/hadoop-0.20.2/conf 10/09/17 14:33:29 ERROR driver.MahoutDriver: MahoutDriver failed with args: [-s, output/clusters-9, -p, output/points, null] File does not exist: /usr/mahout-0.3/output/points/part-00000 Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: File does not exist: /usr/mahout-0.3/output/points/part-00000 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.getFileStatus(DistributedFileSy stem.java:457) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.getLength(FileSystem.java:676) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.(SequenceFile.java:1417) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.(SequenceFile.java:1412) at org.apache.mahout.utils.clustering.ClusterDumper.readPoints(ClusterDumper.ja va:330) at org.apache.mahout.utils.clustering.ClusterDumper.init(ClusterDumper.java:85) at org.apache.mahout.utils.clustering.ClusterDumper.(ClusterDumper.java:7 8) at org.apache.mahout.utils.clustering.ClusterDumper.main(ClusterDumper.java:276 ) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39 ) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ProgramDriver$ProgramDescription.invoke(ProgramDriver .java:68) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ProgramDriver.driver(ProgramDriver.java:139) at org.apache.mahout.driver.MahoutDriver.main(MahoutDriver.java:172) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39 ) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:156) so, how to view the result of kmeans? Best Wishes Wangss ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CB5676.A2D1A8D0-- From general-return-2115-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 17 21:20:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24983 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 21:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 21:20:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 33298 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 21:20:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33050 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 21:20:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33042 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 21:20:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:20:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:20:30 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so2843232qwk.35 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.126.222 with SMTP id d30mr3196641qcs.223.1284758409938; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.71.197 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:20:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: What's Happening Around Hadoop World? From: Jon Zuanich To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd66eaca5867204907b203f --000e0cd66eaca5867204907b203f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If anyone knows of other events happening around Hadoop World please let us know and we will include them in our calendar. These are items Cloudera has happening around Hadoop World: *Oct 11:* Training - Intro to Hadoop Training - Hadoop Essentials for Managers Training - Cloudera HUE SDK 6: Customer Appreciation Dinner *Oct 12:* 6 - 7:30: Networking Reception *Oct 13:* Training - Developer Training & Certification Training - Administrator Training & Certification Training - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig *Oct 14:* Training(cont.) - Developer Training & Certification Training(cont.) - Administrator Training & Certification Training(cont.) - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig *Oct 15:* Training - HBase Regards, Jon -- Jon Zuanich Marketing Intern Cloudera jon.zuanich@cloudera.com blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera web: www.cloudera.com *Hadoop World 2010 -- October 12 | New York -- *Register today! --000e0cd66eaca5867204907b203f-- From general-return-2116-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 17 21:22:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25419 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 21:22:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 21:22:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 35945 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 21:22:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35583 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 21:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35528 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 21:22:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:22:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:22:18 +0000 Received: by gxk7 with SMTP id 7so1327503gxk.35 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:21:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+THS3DEhq4WvYqckKURvgdok8YjSdxZMT1gMsUSIyOo=; b=yEGfcu28swY2SvQTnkvYsPS28yv8guMQSSsQx8eM8uGPEHS6m7/MOFZI7oJPy1/1Gi gpvnzdKGm1Zwy9EoQpTuBLGd3JBIcPiiU5sqJIXtbeuBNfVSPJEKLZQJ4JHyipgoiVwu j5foyLhIgvqlhqJs4KnCtC8KID5+fUvqfE8N8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lm3/cbJbdfaNn64ryU/Sw5apw/V9RkrXwPT5aUXTg7eu/aRWl1SxlffqdcJcG+7op8 2ftXNfOoK8YTmPxbCDIjteAMObuzBAfTKYyZX498nEzTgGWDU/GVwA4FxmfLP4WzeIFI uMoBjC49iOmkAxfBFNmuH75RJjN8G12pO2gzI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.51.2 with SMTP id y2mr3852226agy.107.1284758518019; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.199.138 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:21:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:21:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What's Happening Around Hadoop World? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is this HUG for HBase the night before: http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/calendar/14606174/ -ryan On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Jon Zuanich wrote: > If anyone knows of other events happening around Hadoop World please let us > know and we will include them in our calendar. > > These are items Cloudera has happening around Hadoop World: > > *Oct 11:* > Training - Intro to Hadoop > Training - Hadoop Essentials for Managers > Training - Cloudera HUE SDK > 6: Customer Appreciation Dinner > *Oct 12:* > 6 - 7:30: Networking Reception > *Oct 13:* > Training - Developer Training & Certification > Training - Administrator Training & Certification > Training - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig > *Oct 14:* > Training(cont.) - Developer Training & Certification > Training(cont.) - Administrator Training & Certification > Training(cont.) - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig > *Oct 15:* > Training - HBase > > Regards, > Jon > > -- > Jon Zuanich > Marketing Intern > Cloudera > jon.zuanich@cloudera.com > blog: cloudera.com/blog > twitter: twitter.com/cloudera > web: www.cloudera.com > > *Hadoop World 2010 -- October 12 | New York -- *Register > today! > From general-return-2117-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 17 22:10:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39741 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 22:10:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 22:10:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 97864 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 22:10:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97800 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 22:10:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97792 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 22:10:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:10:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:09:55 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3649100qyk.14 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:09:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.246.194 with SMTP id lz2mr3959820qcb.216.1284761372477; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.71.197 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:09:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:09:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What's Happening Around Hadoop World? From: Jon Zuanich To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64f92003a497504907bd1c1 --0016e64f92003a497504907bd1c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Ryan, I'll be sure to include it. -Jon On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > There is this HUG for HBase the night before: > > http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/calendar/14606174/ > > -ryan > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Jon Zuanich > wrote: > > If anyone knows of other events happening around Hadoop World please let > us > > know and we will include them in our calendar. > > > > These are items Cloudera has happening around Hadoop World: > > > > *Oct 11:* > > Training - Intro to Hadoop > > Training - Hadoop Essentials for Managers > > Training - Cloudera HUE SDK > > 6: Customer Appreciation Dinner > > *Oct 12:* > > 6 - 7:30: Networking Reception > > *Oct 13:* > > Training - Developer Training & Certification > > Training - Administrator Training & Certification > > Training - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig > > *Oct 14:* > > Training(cont.) - Developer Training & Certification > > Training(cont.) - Administrator Training & Certification > > Training(cont.) - Analyzing Data with Hive and Pig > > *Oct 15:* > > Training - HBase > > > > Regards, > > Jon > > > > -- > > Jon Zuanich > > Marketing Intern > > Cloudera > > jon.zuanich@cloudera.com > > blog: cloudera.com/blog > > twitter: twitter.com/cloudera > > web: www.cloudera.com > > > > *Hadoop World 2010 -- October 12 | New York -- *Register > > today! > > > -- Jon Zuanich Marketing Intern Cloudera jon.zuanich@cloudera.com blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera web: www.cloudera.com *Hadoop World 2010 -- October 12 | New York -- *Register today! --0016e64f92003a497504907bd1c1-- From general-return-2118-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 17 22:37:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45313 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2010 22:37:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 22:37:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20280 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 22:37:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20234 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2010 22:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20218 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2010 22:37:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:37:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ghelmling@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:37:43 +0000 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so1246178pzk.35 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Iw3daIibIIaQXCiQg4j/dJ2RldYzfjl78CH0fPLlNeE=; b=Tu4V6Bz45S3PdJYS15ge91z1xTr+2j4D3uIZZzq+iGLHIL6It9XM4w4DtH4NkIECos /Um2NCJI0z6XFXGHPixOduEj/dVaTtm82CsVfDYv2S8WjXrpoQNMV2My/Q64lDN4q+bd ha0aOrVnxYQcOKfbtU0Wlp3v2nT0OkzSBbc3E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ILlDAGQSn4SgG84zSjK70Pw5xPGnhOJRWk6tegkGfIU4amcarKMOUa/7wJhM6JEVXG tA/ktJaCR9eJa4R8BmiNj20BFuvf6ShoIgrp45ByNzzDom482TkhbmkURHnO8O4IzJ5T J+SzpjpdiOBmTfuBJznZOOyBxKYFl1QJnAkVY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.118.9 with SMTP id q9mr823260wfc.87.1284763042181; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.160.4 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:37:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Paths of evolution for Hadoop metrics From: Gary Helmling To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b854bff17504907c3451 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0b854bff17504907c3451 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From the HBase perspective, life is complicated by the need to support running on multiple Hadoop versions. Current HBase trunk is really targeted at 0.20-append, but I'm also working to add 0.20-security (or 0.20-append-security) to that. And there have been questions (though I'm not sure a clear decision) on support for 0.21 now that it's released. And obviously I can't predict where things will stand in the 0.22 timeframe. Sounds like the new framework will have some great stuff allowing us to strip out some of the HBase code we've added for metrics (built-on JMX support), which would be great to make use of. But until HBase is targeting only 0.22+ I don't think we'll fully be able to convert to it. So I'd vote for option #2 to allow us to make a phased transition. --gh --001636e0b854bff17504907c3451-- From general-return-2119-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 19 17:12:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94629 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2010 17:12:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 17:12:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 19047 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 17:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18918 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 17:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18910 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2010 17:12:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:12:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of raks.mail@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:12:15 +0000 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so2693372qyk.14 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:11:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E3fELYS2j7fTmdTSVg2GZBlr8sK/XukRKm69DoQzDnA=; b=Jv1A5NiqSjHleZpsoiIm7WXGdRg1IZvyUiHTrUVwm9pXMZk4+V97fvOmSZUcdtmrfn Sj2YJrePTvQkFcYtXxh/TBAxGx0nyLxPBB8/Ie6yPklvU3VfTkgRxX0SjIoyqUBHxwLw r55mCFS+2v3nh5MkoI0rlE6TOyiUTfbeW7rX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=a6+iiONCBtIsSictHL1WznxcktYr28FYi8VL6YS69A4ZkYV5h9zd6fJEyUus3kG2Be oJ6v8xqmFzz5TUDF+vD2JcQAffrBDFD0IQ0oRmwDzCD+UmHtufKWGjbKvAVcgTLulXQX c9q5vxeTl39Ov6Epmogb2YMknCMIvmhwwh55k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.2.19 with SMTP id 19mr5038027qch.283.1284916313847; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.182.69 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:11:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: readFields() throws a NullPointerException From: Rakesh Ramakrishnan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00148539257a73f74b04909fe465 --00148539257a73f74b04909fe465 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have a simple map-reduce program in which my map and reduce primitives look like this map(K,V) = (Text, OutputAggregator) reduce(Text, OutputAggregator) = (Text,Text) The important point is that from my map function I emit an object of type OutputAggregator which is a custom class that implements the Writable interface. However, my reduce fails with the following exception. More specifically, the readFieds() function is throwing an exception. Any clue why ? I use hadoop 0.18.3 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=JobTracker, sessionId= 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0001 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 Length = 10 10 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: bufstart = 0; bufend = 231; bufvoid = 99614720 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: kvstart = 0; kvend = 10; length = 327680 gl_books 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001 java.lang.NullPointerException at org.myorg.OutputAggregator.readFields(OutputAggregator.java:46) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializer.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:67) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializer.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:40) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.readNextValue(Task.java:751) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.next(Task.java:691) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$CombineValuesIterator.next(Task.java:770) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:117) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:1) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.combineAndSpill(MapTask.java:904) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.sortAndSpill(MapTask.java:785) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:698) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:228) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:157) java.io.IOException: Job failed! at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1113) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer.main(xxxParallelizer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) --00148539257a73f74b04909fe465-- From general-return-2120-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 19 17:23:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97268 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2010 17:23:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 17:23:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 26105 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 17:23:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26038 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 17:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26030 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2010 17:23:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:23:02 +0000 Received: from mail41-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.241) by TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.9.40.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:22:40 +0000 Received: from mail41-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail41-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948E4B06FB for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:22:40 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -25 X-BigFish: VPS-25(zzbb2dKbb2cK542N328cM9371Pzz1202hzz8275dhz2dh2a8h43h) Received: from mail41-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail41-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 128491696075281_24431; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.241]) by mail41-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C715D004F for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-voo-smtp05.internal.sungard.corp (216.83.166.46) by TX2EHSMHS017.bigfish.com (10.9.99.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.44; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:22:39 +0000 Received: from us-voo-smtp12.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.54]) by us-voo-smtp05.internal.sungard.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:22:38 -0400 Received: from VOO-EXCHANGE07.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.66]) by us-voo-smtp12.internal.sungard.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:22:38 -0400 Received: from VOO-EXCHANGE04.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.74]) by VOO-EXCHANGE07.internal.sungard.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:22:38 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: readFields() throws a NullPointerException Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:21:56 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: readFields() throws a NullPointerException Thread-Index: ActYHdTtKb3orSj+T+aMbast0ZsLvAAADZ/g References: From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2010 17:22:38.0648 (UTC) FILETIME=[421AE380:01CB581F] X-Reverse-DNS: unknown How are you constructing your WritableDeserializer? The reason that I ask is that on the line you are seeing an error: writable.readFields(dataIn); The only thing that could throw a null pointer exception is if writable was null. Writable is constructed thusly: public Writable deserialize(Writable w) throws IOException { Writable writable; if (w =3D=3D null) { writable=20 =3D (Writable) ReflectionUtils.newInstance(writableClass, getConf()); } else { writable =3D w; } writable.readFields(dataIn); return writable; } So I suspect that you are passing null as the argument to Deserialize and when constructing your WritableDeserializer, you are passing null as the second argument (Class c). This would result in writable being null, and you'd see that error. In one of these two cases you must define your Writable class. Hope this helps, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Rakesh Ramakrishnan [mailto:raks.mail@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 1:12 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: readFields() throws a NullPointerException I have a simple map-reduce program in which my map and reduce primitives look like this map(K,V) =3D (Text, OutputAggregator) reduce(Text, OutputAggregator) =3D (Text,Text) The important point is that from my map function I emit an object of type OutputAggregator which is a custom class that implements the Writable interface. However, my reduce fails with the following exception. More specifically, the readFieds() function is throwing an exception. Any clue why ? I use hadoop 0.18.3 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0001 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 1 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb =3D 100 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer =3D 79691776/99614720 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer =3D 262144/327680 Length =3D 10 10 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: bufstart =3D 0; bufend =3D 231; bufvoid =3D 99614720 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: kvstart =3D 0; kvend =3D 10; = length =3D 327680 gl_books 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001 java.lang.NullPointerException at org.myorg.OutputAggregator.readFields(OutputAggregator.java:46) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:67) at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:40) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.readNextValue(Task.java:751 ) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.next(Task.java:691) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$CombineValuesIterator.next(Task.java:770) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:117) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:1) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.combineAndSpill(MapTask .java:904) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.sortAndSpill(MapTask.ja va:785) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:698) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:228) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:157) java.io.IOException: Job failed! at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1113) at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer.main(xxxParallelizer.java:145) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) From general-return-2121-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 19 21:04:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72201 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2010 21:04:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 21:04:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 55801 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 21:04:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55707 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 21:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55699 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2010 21:04:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:04:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:04:29 +0000 Received: from [188.106.135.35] (helo=motokokusanagi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxR3Q-0004kD-P7 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:04:08 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Keysigning party at Hadoop World Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:04:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201009160934.01127.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1830513.mhGV8cDS4x"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009192304.00817.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart1830513.mhGV8cDS4x Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16.09.2010 Owen O'Malley wrote: > show we trust each other. *grin* If there is a key signing party at > Apache World, we can get into the larger Apache web of trust. Apache World? Do you mean Hadoop World or Apache Con NA? As for the latter = one,=20 there usually is a key signing party at Apache Cons, so getting the Hadoop = devs'=20 keys signed by other Apache committers shouldn't be a huge problem. Isabel --nextPart1830513.mhGV8cDS4x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEUEABECAAYFAkyWesAACgkQPJpCBAwIhbSb+gCePnDgh+Cp14oGTA1RwKY48nF4 oZ4AmKYMN2zisYyynf0s534iuPxVaQs= =DrFv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1830513.mhGV8cDS4x-- From general-return-2122-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 19 21:28:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79320 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2010 21:28:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Sep 2010 21:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68040 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 21:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67811 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67803 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:28:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:27:51 +0000 Received: by pxi3 with SMTP id 3so1816473pxi.35 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:27:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc :x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=sz7jmxPT+EFdOwEZd6ZdQoTiGFcTeMaKmMY2NXKg9Qo=; b=qkf4DISWFxT2dsLEeigS/r4tqPCSxC9m5n80uIeXqq017Lv5LuiUfeZ5SH0lq48HxZ eEg2Iu+h2LlmWcvwh4DQ5JKvdekSY+OL33tIwBhoclTGw7qrpq61KOYpAcCVEO5dNfRv kXlgJm5gCcYsCWsrm15AxhXpx8NW5ecSe4V3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=aHwLAsS6na2v1C3FEqN3iB3S6vDZE01bjxH00Lt/9y1J4YHpPVGMWcKyqBc8T4Veik pJmHiAXGt4UkQqCjACCu8YBFBcCfv8Vn+U6mdyc3zvgTtXGLOrgNjZdHswbB8eIYAfsv 8SSsvtL8Vt8noUil9XXaG8eZmSmrWv8zT6bxU= Received: by 10.142.218.2 with SMTP id q2mr6825958wfg.246.1284931650420; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.8.190.144] ([166.205.137.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm7643138wff.5.2010.09.19.14.27.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:27:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <201009160934.01127.thomas@koch.ro> <201009192304.00817.isabel@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <201009192304.00817.isabel@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A306) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <9BA8FD19-6CA7-46AC-8C71-F30F92222006@gmail.com> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8A306) From: Owen O'Malley Subject: Re: Keysigning party at Hadoop World Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:27:31 -0700 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I meant ApacheCon, which with a few key signatures will tie us into the Apac= he web of trust. I got my key signed by a Debian committer last week and man= y of us will cross sign our keys at the Hadoop contributors meeting this wee= k.=20 -- Owen= From general-return-2123-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 20 01:34:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40550 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2010 01:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2010 01:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 56946 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 01:34:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56865 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 01:34:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56857 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2010 01:34:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:34:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:34:29 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so5682145wyf.35 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ha6LF3O2GorIQR9E/DE0txiNtZBELVgA/01t8w58QT0=; b=I6XStFg0QFn0N0i3xEvpy8BwPjPWQ9zYdyX9onQoowDUHoN1ko9cdB0eO08KxSvIWQ ku7LT2cForfneliqM2WO70MsPr5Ohd15Zpg23XqXIIfB3c97In+c9xxhkXD+ibK2Te/l x5/hYvhq2FsYws5jOqaRwy/gxl8rSfNek4g+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LlE8q72hVm+USLxxbi+0JkWLmo4E8xTOzmeK96gHSs24IhfYzYwNjlAIVTM/grQTQT +oQ+HPLIljuI550FgcgeEKmFjLXFyuFkAhqmMhkzQ3+sYV8b6SvHLSFy8p1DX7aflxW1 x6AF0ckoezIm72MCDHeiZkdY+wGCe6gbJFvSw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.23.199 with SMTP id v49mr3737687wev.43.1284946448006; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.175.70 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:34:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:34:07 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: readFields() throws a NullPointerException From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you have a no-argument constructor for your customer class and in the constructor do you do initialize the members ? Otherwise these members in your customer class will be null. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:21 AM, wrote: > How are you constructing your WritableDeserializer? =C2=A0The reason that= I > ask is that on the line you are seeing an error: > > writable.readFields(dataIn); > > The only thing that could throw a null pointer exception is if writable > was null. =C2=A0Writable is constructed thusly: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0public Writable deserialize(Writable w) throws IOException { > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Writable writable; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0if (w =3D=3D null) { > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0writable > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=3D (Writable) ReflectionUtils.newInsta= nce(writableClass, > getConf()); > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0} else { > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0writable =3D w; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0} > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0writable.readFields(dataIn); > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0return writable; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0} > > So I suspect that you are passing null as the argument to Deserialize > and when constructing your WritableDeserializer, you are passing null as > the second argument (Class c). =C2=A0This would result in writable bei= ng > null, and you'd see that error. > > In one of these two cases you must define your Writable class. > > Hope this helps, > > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rakesh Ramakrishnan [mailto:raks.mail@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 1:12 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: readFields() throws a NullPointerException > > I have a simple map-reduce program in which my map and reduce primitives > look like this > > map(K,V) =3D (Text, OutputAggregator) > reduce(Text, OutputAggregator) =3D (Text,Text) > > The important point is that from my map function I emit an object of > type > OutputAggregator which is a custom class that implements the Writable > interface. However, my reduce fails with the following exception. More > specifically, the readFieds() function is throwing an exception. Any > clue > why ? I use hadoop 0.18.3 > > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with > processName=3DJobTracker, sessionId=3D > 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the > same. > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process : 1 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process : 1 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process : 1 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process : 1 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0001 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 1 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb =3D 100 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer =3D 79691776/99614720 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer =3D 262144/327680 > Length =3D 10 > 10 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: bufstart =3D 0; bufend =3D 231; > bufvoid =3D 99614720 > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: kvstart =3D 0; kvend =3D 10; lengt= h =3D > 327680 > gl_books > 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001 > java.lang.NullPointerException > =C2=A0at org.myorg.OutputAggregator.readFields(OutputAggregator.java:46) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ > er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:67) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ > er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:40) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.readNextValue(Task.java:751 > ) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.next(Task.java:691) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$CombineValuesIterator.next(Task.java:770) > =C2=A0at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:117= ) > =C2=A0at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:1) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.combineAndSpill(MapTask > .java:904) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.sortAndSpill(MapTask.ja > va:785) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:698) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:228) > =C2=A0at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:157) > java.io.IOException: Job failed! > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1113) > =C2=A0at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer.main(xxxParallelizer.java:145) > =C2=A0at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > =C2=A0at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) > =C2=A0at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) > =C2=A0at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) > =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) > > --=20 Best Regards Jeff Zhang From general-return-2124-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 20 01:37:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41125 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2010 01:37:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2010 01:37:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 59088 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 01:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59023 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 01:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59015 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2010 01:37:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:37:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of raks.mail@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:37:10 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so3943743qwk.35 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:36:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W5g2ypvSEjjCYZ3qtfNoshZml6nkbVg8PglxksaUvxs=; b=x6N3Cvu/bWusuoG8ejv1L5s26dgyHlwi9dafFxeDeoA8dcX3klSpMR8G1DRKF84ez0 GZ28JMQPMHnAf5rUVO2CnPBjpR4L0wSZWeWrRUjG8Oh66tkxuRkeeNupI6cVPvEYLRLy Z0iv4rE85XUF8DwOnBjZWd8gDBx1hZL33ka40= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nFgsXa/KQotEXGjAl2csOauuQj7LYqfAxJNFkt2x7bYczLOO09/8P7tPaHSDvI1u5M nQNxP47McdbsO0YaS7XEtBBVMQ3n8iroeEGyd+p110T1S5ScXmEK6B2vh/2+Wdx909eI /Ax6yzOLtkyomEkx8xV3qKp12VYGNQSqzVTp8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.28.139 with SMTP id m11mr3937756qac.350.1284946609614; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.182.69 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:36:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:36:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: readFields() throws a NullPointerException From: Rakesh Ramakrishnan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdfac38ae640490a6f261 --0015175cdfac38ae640490a6f261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Jeff. Yes, I was not initializing the members. It works fine now. On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Do you have a no-argument constructor for your customer class and in > the constructor do you do initialize the members ? Otherwise these > members in your customer class will be null. > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:21 AM, wrote: > > How are you constructing your WritableDeserializer? The reason that I > > ask is that on the line you are seeing an error: > > > > writable.readFields(dataIn); > > > > The only thing that could throw a null pointer exception is if writable > > was null. Writable is constructed thusly: > > > > public Writable deserialize(Writable w) throws IOException { > > Writable writable; > > if (w == null) { > > writable > > = (Writable) ReflectionUtils.newInstance(writableClass, > > getConf()); > > } else { > > writable = w; > > } > > writable.readFields(dataIn); > > return writable; > > } > > > > So I suspect that you are passing null as the argument to Deserialize > > and when constructing your WritableDeserializer, you are passing null as > > the second argument (Class c). This would result in writable being > > null, and you'd see that error. > > > > In one of these two cases you must define your Writable class. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Chris > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rakesh Ramakrishnan [mailto:raks.mail@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 1:12 PM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: readFields() throws a NullPointerException > > > > I have a simple map-reduce program in which my map and reduce primitives > > look like this > > > > map(K,V) = (Text, OutputAggregator) > > reduce(Text, OutputAggregator) = (Text,Text) > > > > The important point is that from my map function I emit an object of > > type > > OutputAggregator which is a custom class that implements the Writable > > interface. However, my reduce fails with the following exception. More > > specifically, the readFieds() function is throwing an exception. Any > > clue > > why ? I use hadoop 0.18.3 > > > > > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with > > processName=JobTracker, sessionId= > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the > > same. > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process : 1 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process : 1 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process : 1 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process : 1 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0001 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 1 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 > > Length = 10 > > 10 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: bufstart = 0; bufend = 231; > > bufvoid = 99614720 > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 INFO mapred.MapTask: kvstart = 0; kvend = 10; length = > > 327680 > > gl_books > > 10/09/19 04:04:59 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001 > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > at org.myorg.OutputAggregator.readFields(OutputAggregator.java:46) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ > > er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:67) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization$WritableDeserializ > > er.deserialize(WritableSerialization.java:40) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.readNextValue(Task.java:751 > > ) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$ValuesIterator.next(Task.java:691) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$CombineValuesIterator.next(Task.java:770) > > at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:117) > > at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer$Reduce.reduce(xxxParallelizer.java:1) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.combineAndSpill(MapTask > > .java:904) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.sortAndSpill(MapTask.ja > > va:785) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:698) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:228) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:157) > > java.io.IOException: Job failed! > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1113) > > at org.myorg.xxxParallelizer.main(xxxParallelizer.java:145) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) > > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > --0015175cdfac38ae640490a6f261-- From general-return-2125-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 20 03:05:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74558 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2010 03:05:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2010 03:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 13766 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 03:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13420 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 03:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13407 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2010 03:05:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:05:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kengoou@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:05:14 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so3985325qwk.35 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=h04NWuAhZjmGfoLLP39GrB7Y/GlHmbgekYQVx/qdCyg=; b=Nn1dbH6dJ4o4JWBSDNcO+qqNOerIXMw7I7BR5SYZcSCesSRSYzJ0Kw1IyLHOyoxZtg Q9GgXumlIq77RRRfyRxskvwK6qSq9n7dWdPi1mwtCxXeDteEeY+WbmP7nRV3MwYS+I3m Gt18caMUYnjcDbrhFu7iTCs1SLnFOHDIKzUB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=ZcG1ABp8D677ZXWEzqWbH3alkdKGbUUyCOxhHvsu7UScRUqB0tWSuNLOJGp6XNkDAV NMCaD6dqXH+x8OQn7OMyab7cmED/7uSylEEZN5bo8iJdJ+whAM2kMyJd39Q0AYLD3Ffd bznWR4KsEDy6Qx5l0gRw/dVZsZyyNaH+H7M8E= Received: by 10.229.79.76 with SMTP id o12mr5784325qck.40.1284951892989; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com (mail-qy0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm7072348qcr.29.2010.09.19.20.04.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so2986269qyk.14 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=h04NWuAhZjmGfoLLP39GrB7Y/GlHmbgekYQVx/qdCyg=; b=UYIQCocxGLVTKW3jF4Y71GHDHvDV/hx0TJXDyvQJcft8mZzeuMrGfb3C2TIS/y7Txq IQtn0b+he8QhPhJQ91gzZ9WLjmyQVDHnNAbruP5c6UI1miv28eM8cJvomwaQouIMOlAq 220nTfEBWkklnOw0EVBcchdHI133dLhBMhs3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=k3TwTaBM+W9s+OynWgS5wyff3Tn6Vqx5hgnS1dK8JZn3XKy4mg/i7VgChGH591TToX +ksBREaNlVnWL+EW7JU4BKgZlzXQJ3K/sxkaWPPfV3eH4FrEbwgp9xtDpfLNfuRYbmxX AYmPqJo0CFveEqeTR0h5A3WgeDdq/JvW3tVds= Received: by 10.224.69.14 with SMTP id x14mr5415131qai.212.1284951891113; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.232.144 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:04:31 -0700 (PDT) From: KENGOOU Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:04:31 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: about "Hadoop in Action" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nice to meet you. I am KENGOOU. Hadoop is researched in Japan. Recently, it began to read "Hadoop in Action". It wants to make this book a Japanese translation and to publish it in Japan. I am embarrassed because there is no report method though I want to take the permission of a Japanese translation in author's Dr.Chuck Lam. The answer was not able to be gotten though it E-mailed to Manning of the publisher. Could you teach if there is something a good method to publish a Japanese translation? Please my best regards. KENGOOOU From general-return-2126-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 20 13:23:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95783 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2010 13:23:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Sep 2010 13:23:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 67606 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 13:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67156 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2010 13:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67145 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2010 13:23:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:23:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:23:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04425B7D9A for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:22:41 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oqalsHxN2OKh for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:22:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C15AB7D97 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:22:41 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1285593747.47099@9gkL+qoW2zQ4t2fokcL8pw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o8KDMQte024039 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:22:26 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C976012.1070806@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:22:26 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100826 Thunderbird/3.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: about "Hadoop in Action" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o8KDMQte024039 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 20/09/10 04:04, KENGOOU wrote: > Nice to meet you. > I am KENGOOU. > > Hadoop is researched in Japan. > Recently, it began to read "Hadoop in Action". > It wants to make this book a Japanese translation and to publish it in > Japan. I am embarrassed because there is no report method though I > want to take the permission of a Japanese translation in author's > Dr.Chuck Lam. > > The answer was not able to be gotten though it E-mailed to Manning of > the publisher. > > Could you teach if there is something a good method to publish a > Japanese translation? > > Please my best regards. > > KENGOOOU Hi, I'll put you in touch with the publisher, you can talk to them From general-return-2127-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 23 16:45:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24503 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2010 16:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 16:45:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 74793 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 16:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74651 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 16:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74642 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2010 16:45:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:45:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of swhitecross@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:44:59 +0000 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so842371pwj.35 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y0owZQIlHYMQ1nBobXrT1o4Wl3XcX7sRFI/PToPlmKw=; b=lebQ6edJ6Vr3HcxaLmtfgpSv6HwpXmEmC/CoCpEDN3CCSaodhwsK7kXhm34bC2rBHB 0WhJUQV9nUSkxHFvsP8Q+jlJ/lwLRvqbLDxwkrFhqqeojCB24jR9uqJEgEiyirQWTCw+ en4f28Ew8icX/UtrgF7ibXbq9ybcN1qtIMHF8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TgqsYMVLRMAIi57J2lNm3pbjlcruM54678BUzMo+GyAAuVvTQnycSrafLfj27fM218 vzpVKYDMKgwsnlOwEx+Bg+o7Zi2eLoxlJnBvVTLoRLuBCGKPrrLteNgg/9nw3Ha+VrT1 kulTb8eoKtX9+dD1jA9KNdPLSd0enG7P8TeZ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.27.4 with SMTP id a4mr2134411waa.44.1285260279437; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.12.138 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:44:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Common EOFException Causes? From: Scott Whitecross To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636417f7d665bae0490effa43 --001636417f7d665bae0490effa43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all - What are the typical causes for EOFExceptions during a Hadoop job? I've seen references to not enough xcievers, but I can't find any logs complaining explicitly about this case. Thanks. --001636417f7d665bae0490effa43-- From general-return-2128-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 23 21:52:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55300 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2010 21:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2010 21:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 33198 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 21:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32965 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2010 21:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32957 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2010 21:52:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kengoou@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:52:08 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1806922qwk.35 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=P/x1jG45FyuoPakgZr9Vl41MJQrXoPWobLK8b3WaU/8=; b=GmNP+H+UygZQOyn0GH33lSynBdejJW2utHXp66+tjGvxVc9nV0ZRGUGkZGBzXIOBnx J3f28Lv3hWjTuNKUBxtb37TEEMz2lazt3ZqabkaytPcLJwjgxajJlm+sg0Yc1hvHs168 0kE+9FQwMSha8QX6pCOyBgHTLvgs2q2vYXQSw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Eu+/wKS5NnI/cv78ti007NdzqsvnQdoy/FUSHg3ECkT28doOZ46KyCM7uM7aiuvIDc 3w0NeVFS8PidBW4jc3fpjNrHulHni+OybktEAuadzfuNBO5jB9tVwqQP91SN4fVmvkhi are0A7rxjQGsnQ1k6Dd/2O9KnKV7Evjfs4b+o= Received: by 10.224.71.143 with SMTP id h15mr1735248qaj.217.1285278706919; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f48.google.com (mail-qw0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm1449234qcs.9.2010.09.23.14.51.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1806900qwk.35 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=P/x1jG45FyuoPakgZr9Vl41MJQrXoPWobLK8b3WaU/8=; b=h3WG/eLaINEh1sIigSlvPKdZffAyF+d/e93b8msQcqB83dE6yWQHdNzDTsz6YvGoyd uVozf/DjZNlseOPFx13Qv2gP4HMbL+Cg1SSn98X/ipH2gupQtH63ghV6c32wdl8+YWOz glEBaBwBhKxVTOl1zcHPCSBRGwABrbX8/4MK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=KNZdgagtxbzDzRkNcVfiTK8BGl3PWYErb7bS3U2nHXDmFTqtehX1Th7FBkiv12H2Ms bsK/C8mL52/91MrYxKC0Uze5Nzife8OwHEJ/TqKPdCZWjkz70dJwpdYoKsP1M0tbyKGM Ywl4d9hYGcRtr9ku1LNLQ2MHjA1c9QzoBo1jE= Received: by 10.224.28.207 with SMTP id n15mr1811534qac.48.1285278705029; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.222.130 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:51:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C976012.1070806@apache.org> References: <4C976012.1070806@apache.org> From: KENGOOU Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:51:24 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: about "Hadoop in Action" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you Mr,Steve KENGOOU > > Hi, I'll put you in touch with the publisher, you can talk to them > From general-return-2129-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 28 14:38:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90734 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2010 14:38:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2010 14:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 68465 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 14:38:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67924 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2010 14:38:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67908 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2010 14:38:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:38:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:52 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so177462wwi.5 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4zebXU42Kgy8uM02TF8Ncl7uUMLDbxDGqgr7SLEeKAM=; b=pEpF2owki0RM9sMoIIxoBOzPSz3G6QWhBrG0hmBRpAdVkwodxsglsnYd5tanQpNoiE cWr/VrtIp4LTZDiKGQChb0rJBmwwrsFy9Z95EQOpFbSfzWkrwW7+qjVsBACxO4lqIn2P H8JOsGgVaunaC8SiIAxsGS+mUYG7KXsb+7bn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=J01BB5YWsCYzyFXM8+tj7WMqyk/qcoc0XKAjRKmeo8rwpd5DCscKq6kLbuPKTRlZtE aVjC4Zf33qRAMf1q4V5lw1O0ELL6aGPT6siI8D28xnAkz3rIDwMeRa0MJTCcwAtTzHyg KONTBka2yur3a/5t+EtW990ubYN2gkS4fWIIA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.6 with SMTP id r6mr1153706wek.55.1285684651770; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:07:31 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Hive Error: while executing select count(*) From: vaibhav negi To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44d18f64330049152c8df X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44d18f64330049152c8df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am using hadoop version 0.20.2 While running query "select count(*) from table;" on Hive,i am getting this error FAILED: Execution Error, return code 2 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.MapRedTask Error in task tracker logs says :- Error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(ConcurrentHashMap.java:768) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) On debugging i found that ReduceTask.java:2683 line is using host which is coming null ReduceTask.java:2683 --- List loc = mapLocations.get(host); One user in Hadoop Forum says HADOOP-4744 should be included in hadoop. Is this patch required for hadoop 0.20.2 ? How to add patch? Is this an issue with /etc/hosts file? Please help Regards Vaibhav Negi --001485f44d18f64330049152c8df-- From general-return-2130-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 29 12:01:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28653 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2010 12:01:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 12:01:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 54906 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 12:01:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54107 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 12:01:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54091 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2010 12:01:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:01:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:01:10 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so771888wyg.35 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/e58WF9lh6AUjUfYRO7O+X/19CJqK6+fipZ2ZDDpWZU=; b=V8ysTnCkZ2WtISLzvCX7R3HyJwJOTlUHVaxLtNktbbO4MEwQLxxEC0FQR5adUHW3py oWHnjwL2KyUpNDTha/lyMxTIeh2r9nliFW/Ll/rolwRGeGYhX857SsuVEofZN6xoKIxz qj8h4JTuSlT0j1OkyBS0jQ+dHVl1dFrNkFZ0s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=drR6rDxY5NNUcAJOqzHr03/ghZdQ9aqsfSmjgYz1pR/ixQi1gRuvMkcJCwIK0+Sf71 Nx3eHWWtil8QrkkyMIc94mkET/qCoN1ExhU0XEBCxvHmZ7G0FyMn3ve3JxZdAwwWt5mz 35D7QVhZzGdSRFxtV9qm4N/qSkZBv5ir8Ng4A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.234.93 with SMTP id r71mr2393631weq.104.1285761649354; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:30:49 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Error: java.lang.NullPointerException From: vaibhav negi To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758a95e6028a6049164b610 --00151758a95e6028a6049164b610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am using hadoop version 0.20.2 While running query "select count(*) from table;" on Hive,i am getting this error FAILED: Execution Error, return code 2 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql. exec.MapRedTask Error in task tracker logs says :- Error: java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(ConcurrentHashMap.java:768) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) How to debug and correct it?? Vaibhav Negi --00151758a95e6028a6049164b610-- From general-return-2131-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 30 11:54:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85719 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2010 11:54:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2010 11:54:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 81954 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2010 11:54:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80987 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2010 11:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80952 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2010 11:53:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sssssssenator@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:53:50 +0000 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so1230988wwb.29 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dYKgdJibQj/QG4bEbvTrHC8MchG+lP/v1vKqvX7pDHE=; b=bWE44+uODDRw+468WGq1kl7iXZ88UopwM3VGL4hbpJcDkMf8Gmz32t8W5oEVCKvI+8 N3JHFv3p13k+11JRSPeG60j5/LEV8YFXoFN3zfw/jrTEyGXMg1ucgtZ6ZK8/CGEOYcaP +4Q8R9stvjHD8lnhfcC28IE3AzdELzj3wG95E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gHQj+EW/qsleTe/QJ/+xF0rXWc1Er/7euGOfKum4pkaBLBzsuT7M2ppf9w8ErFNzTf eoLxAkbkg1pg4gIdcHs5H8msvYIUXpjP5FEfHtBndoOpdrVDSVhCLHpHdYvn5qrEoQ+w hOV6iIFEYdTFJ3AUxeLNfDsato2ToPlJvDB6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.16 with SMTP id g16mr2848306wef.78.1285847114804; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.170.202 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:45:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:15:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error: java.lang.NullPointerException From: vaibhav negi To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ec6c836df70491789cb0 --0016e6d7ec6c836df70491789cb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I am stuck at it. Please help Regards Vaibhav Negi On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, vaibhav negi wrote: > Hi, > > I am using hadoop version 0.20.2 > > While running query "select count(*) from table;" on Hive,i am getting this > error > > FAILED: Execution Error, return code 2 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql. > exec.MapRedTask > > Error in task tracker logs says :- > > Error: java.lang.NullPointerException > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.get(ConcurrentHashMap.java:768) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.getMapCompletionEvents(ReduceTask.java:2683) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask$ReduceCopier$GetMapEventsThread.run(ReduceTask.java:2605) > > > How to debug and correct it?? > > > Vaibhav Negi > --0016e6d7ec6c836df70491789cb0-- From general-return-2132-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 30 20:14:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75242 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2010 20:14:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2010 20:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 33976 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2010 20:14:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33920 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2010 20:14:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33912 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2010 20:14:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:14:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:14:09 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so2678397qyk.14 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.89.80 with SMTP id d16mr2940966qam.169.1285877622726; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.62.140 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:13:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: New Content Added @ Hadoop World From: Jon Zuanich To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb29aed5fac04917fb628 --0015175cb29aed5fac04917fb628 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We would like to inform you that the program guide for Hadoop World was released this morning. Feel free to browse and plan the path you would like take at the conference. We have received so much great content from interesting companies within the Hadoop community that we decided to add 5 new breakout sessions to the Hadoop World Agenda . Looking forward to seeing you on October 12th in New York City! Cheers, Jon -- Reminder: Hadoop World Hash Tag>> #hw2010 Jon Zuanich Marketing Intern Cloudera jon.zuanich@cloudera.com blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera web: www.cloudera.com *Hadoop World 2010 -- October 12 | New York -- *Register today! --0015175cb29aed5fac04917fb628-- From general-return-672-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 01 16:56:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55948 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2009 16:56:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2009 16:56:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 46182 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2009 16:56:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46095 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2009 16:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46085 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2009 16:56:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:56:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.156] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:56:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so139674fgg.11 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:55:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OUwVrJyuT44K79VOwoKfhMj92Yti8GMRvRZ2ksFjB3k=; b=Vdv0lqjSBYZT4Ac70KdUNCx1dkE+FN7HXFIMDh/2squ5eNVk6ji2J8S+yUJu4Qrj1n NX0yHsRmM7AVEfTfbvkC/ZUQtDEkMSZUkFz0wjdV8OHN+S3FzGfIyD2jEMKFchpJo5XP HOfPpubc+yVcYPugCr2EvJuE4BsRtyeB8lX8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vdYc1GlxL0UTqYPcfaS346BuxzkV0mprWABVgpGgcv1BF3Gp2G9yfPMJVLGZWP8WoM npQ81yBQLjm2TdBYaHBjSAKgWiNxbrXosLYWHx6F4VO8X0lczLVM6bxzKSluSip08qXj VYqBcMZMVVsYSaNuVHX9MtbgxyQcZmr6KtFUM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.48.19 with SMTP id a19mr1657915muk.136.1257094553854; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:55:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:55:53 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> Subject: TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGS & DEBUGGING IN HADOOP From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f40454e43a0477522252 --0016e659f40454e43a0477522252 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! In a project involving Hadoop (0.20.1) I=B4m working, I=B4d ne= ed to know if I=B4m reading properly the content of a file located in the HDFS. Beside the try...catch block, is there any other option for printing values in the console (in a similar way standard IO Java mechanisms do, like System.out.println("the variable is ", var))? Another thing, is there a simply way to debug Hadoop applications? (actuall= y I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode, for developing purposes). Thanks a lot in advance. --=20 Alberto --0016e659f40454e43a0477522252-- From general-return-673-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 02 14:25:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32397 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2009 14:25:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2009 14:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 48178 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 14:25:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47659 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 14:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47549 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 14:25:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:25:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:25:20 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tce.edu) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N4xpu-00051L-5k for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:54:46 +0530 Received: from 59.92.125.114 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tce.edu with HTTP; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:54:46 +0530 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:54:46 +0530 Subject: Http 404 Error while viewing tasktracker in Browser From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi all, I have downloaded hadoop and configured it in my local system.I have run the wordcount program with some files as dataset .It run successfully but when I opened the browser to see GUI for tasktracker and job tracker , it shows me the following error: HTTP ERROR: 404 /jobtracker.jsp RequestURI=/jobtracker.jsp Powered by Jetty:// Can anyone please help me and tell how to see results in GUI? Thank you in advance, R.Abhilaash. -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-674-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 02 19:52:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74219 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2009 19:52:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2009 19:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 84256 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 19:52:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84168 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 19:52:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84156 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 19:52:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:52:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO QMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:52:34 +0000 Received: from OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by QMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0Jkj1d00d0S2fkCADKsDre; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:52:13 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0Ks41d0082SbwD58VKs6Sl; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:52:10 +0000 Message-Id: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-11--288551153 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:52:02 -0800 References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-11--288551153 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-11--288551153 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bylaws.xml Content-Type: text/xml; x-unix-mode=0644; name="bylaws.xml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Project Bylaws Apache Hadoop PMC

This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc.

Hadoop is a project of the Apache Software Foundation. The foundation holds the copyright on Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The foundation FAQ explains the operation and background of the foundation.

Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If you are new to Apache development, please refer to the Incubator project for more information on how Apache projects operate.

Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following sections

The most important participants in the project are people who use our software. The majority of our developers start out as users and guide their development efforts from the user's perspective.

Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache community by helping other users on mailing lists and user support forums.

All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A developer that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of such invitations depends on many factors.

The project's Committers are responsible for the project's technical management. Committers have access to a specified set of subproject's subversion repositories. Committers on subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion regarding that subproject.

Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of active PMC members.

Commit access can be revoked by a unanimous vote of all the active PMC members (except the committer in question if they are also a PMC member).

All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software Foundation. There is a Committer FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for Committers

A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, etc.

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The responsibilities of the PMC include

  • Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop project. In particular all releases must be approved by the PMC
  • Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the codebase repository, mailing lists, websites.
  • Speaking on behalf of the project.
  • Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project
  • Nominating new PMC members and committers
  • Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project

Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC member is considered "emeritus" by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus member may request reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of the active PMC members. Membership of the PMC can be revoked by an unanimous vote of all the active PMC members other than the member in question.

The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to the board for the management of the projects within the scope of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on developments within the Hadoop project.

When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision must be ratified by the Apache board.

Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require different forms of approval. For example, the previous section describes several decisions which require "lazy consensus" approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the types of approvals, and which types of decision require which type of approval.

Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes may contain multiple items for approval and these should be clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the vote mail. Voting may take four flavours

+1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be performed." In general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen"
+0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not be able to help.
-0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in general, agree with the proposed action but is not concerned enough to prevent the action going ahead.
-1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes must contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a -1 vote to include an alternative course of action.

All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to show their agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For technical decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. Non binding votes are still useful for those with binding votes to understand the perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For PMC decisions, only the votes of PMC members are binding.

Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop codebase. These typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the commit message sent when the commit is made.

These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions require different types of approvals

A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is valid.

If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, the action that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner.

This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and those who have binding votes over the action.

Consensus For this to pass, all voters with binding votes must vote and there can be no binding vetoes (-1). Consensus votes are rarely required due to the impracticality of getting all eligible voters to cast a vote.
Lazy Consensus Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes.
Lazy Majority A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes that -1 votes.
Lazy Approval An action with lazy approval is implicitly allowed unless a -1 vote is received, at which time, depending on the type of action, either lazy majority or lazy consensus approval must be obtained.
2/3 Majority Some actions require a 2/3 majority of active committers or PMC members to pass. Such actions typically affect the foundation of the project (e.g. adopting a new codebase to replace an existing product). The higher threshold is designed to ensure such changes are strongly supported. To pass this vote requires at least 2/3 of binding vote holders to vote +1
Action Description Approval Binding Votes
Code Change A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc. Lazy approval and then lazy consensus. Active committers.
Release Plan Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also nominates a Release Manager. Lazy majority Active committers
Product Release When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is required to accept the release as an official release of the project. Lazy Majority Active PMC members
Adoption of New Codebase

When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to gain approval, the existing code base will continue.

This also covers the creation of new sub-projects within the project

2/3 majority Active committers
New Committer When a new committer is proposed for the project Lazy consensus Active PMC members
New PMC Member When a committer is proposed for the PMC Lazy consensus Active PMC members
Committer Removal

When removal of commit privileges is sought.

Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair

Consensus Active PMC members (excluding the committer in question if a member of the PMC).
PMC Member Removal

When removal of a PMC member is sought.

Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair

Consensus Active PMC members (excluding the member in question).
Modifying Bylaws

Modifying this document.

2/3 majority Active PMC members

Votes are open for a period of 3 work days to allow all active voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be made as timely as possible.

--Apple-Mail-11--288551153 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Apple-Mail-11--288551153-- From general-return-675-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 02 20:41:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1557 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2009 20:41:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2009 20:41:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 69130 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 20:41:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69025 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 20:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69015 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 20:41:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 1417 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 20:41:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:41:23 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org These look good to me. +1 A few minor changes I'd prefer but not insist on: - Replace the term "developer" with "contributor". This seems more precise and consistent with our wiki documentation. - Emeritus timeout should be 12 months instead of 6. Perhaps this doesn't matter, since we're not bound to make someone emeritus after six months, but events might reasonably keep someone away for six, and I think we've generally not bothered to make anyone emeritus until they've been idle for 12 months, so 12 months seems more descriptive of our actual practice. Thanks for proposing this! Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in > Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked > around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly > complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them > over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve > these bylaws. > > -- Owen > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > From general-return-676-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 02 21:06:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11138 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2009 21:06:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2009 21:06:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 9404 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 21:06:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9319 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 21:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9309 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 21:06:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:06:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:06:33 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so3869940iwn.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:06:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.69 with SMTP id j5mr777019ibw.33.1257195971155; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:06:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:05:51 -0800 Message-ID: <15da8a100911021305x7201ae99gf2098768c8ea5cf2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d33c7c464b4f047769bfcf --001636d33c7c464b4f047769bfcf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1. (I'm not a committer, so not to be counted in the final vote count) The following quoted section felt a bit inexact. Vetoes often come in before the action is "done", so there's nothing to reverse. The spirit is clear, of course, but one could change it to something like "If a veto is not withdrawn but the action has been done, the vetoed action must be reversed in a timely manner." If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, the action that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. -- Philip --001636d33c7c464b4f047769bfcf-- From general-return-677-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 02 21:17:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16215 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2009 21:17:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2009 21:17:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 29517 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 21:17:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29440 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2009 21:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29430 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 21:17:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:17:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:17:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 16154 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 21:17:12 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:17:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4AEF4C57.1070109@apache.org> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:17:11 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <15da8a100911021305x7201ae99gf2098768c8ea5cf2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <15da8a100911021305x7201ae99gf2098768c8ea5cf2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Philip Zeyliger wrote: > If a veto is not withdrawn, the action that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. A simple change might be to say "any action" instead of "the action". Doug From general-return-678-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 01:11:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5890 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 01:11:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 01:11:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 87956 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 01:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87851 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 01:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87840 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 01:11:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:11:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:11:45 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-247-5.corp.yahoo.com (socks2.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.54.7]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nA31ADMN043963 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:10:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=fb/5K3ecrNequQK28urjJASBRmtlqGQouG5beUjkvYaExtYaEnVhP7k0OKFtlwv/ Message-Id: <9033CE01-58E7-4753-85ED-E6DA34FF9D50@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:10:13 -0800 References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for adoption, and +1 for the two minor changes Doug proposes. Alan. On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > These look good to me. +1 > > A few minor changes I'd prefer but not insist on: > > - Replace the term "developer" with "contributor". This seems more > precise and consistent with our wiki documentation. > > - Emeritus timeout should be 12 months instead of 6. Perhaps this > doesn't matter, since we're not bound to make someone emeritus after > six months, but events might reasonably keep someone away for six, > and I think we've generally not bothered to make anyone emeritus > until they've been idle for 12 months, so 12 months seems more > descriptive of our actual practice. > > Thanks for proposing this! > > Doug > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC >> back in Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define >> them. I looked around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both >> clear and fairly complete. I made some minor edits to match what we >> do. Please look them over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use >> 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. >> -- Owen >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From general-return-679-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 02:15:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41839 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 02:15:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 02:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 46554 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 02:15:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46473 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 02:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46463 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 02:15:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:15:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:15:15 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so4056813iwn.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:14:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jIJ5ittZtZKDrjOv01iLZv7tReQVP3QrErCSDPCDB7o=; b=Lr9C+z/bZftybAXJiRKPMNKCKpoPI8LypcZ3m/XXGTOY12r4P58/C5QVkSjeVAEBI/ tcUGRGJ3llrkbu9MsUK6L4Bpn+5HVhLHcM3tFKycij3tYgyFAsWDs5rAKGu5FlUyon1R m5go0zI5TmntfSwHR6ineRd2iA44NOblaslzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ebpbtU2nMkQiIT3c61d5E7cwfya4ejaHehrvyrpIEA0qxTebvu1ixGMs48mLB4NW6E 685MHggS7i42EiqeCfJfKuFqy0OsU0+8wA6YLzfMrHR3iSgfyZIo0EXsoR2phYVOUv2N SqnKtvvTLoz16KeeAvaKCyLqXUu/1w41mEDRg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.5.23 with SMTP id 23mr7249494ibt.45.1257214494882; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:14:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:14:54 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Http 404 Error while viewing tasktracker in Browser From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773da305fc77804776e0fab --00151773da305fc77804776e0fab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can you please share the URL that you typed. Also, may be the port is blocked by the firewall, check the open ports on your system. Cheers H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/11/2 Abhilaash > > Hi all, > > I have downloaded hadoop and configured it in my local system.I have > run the wordcount program with some files as dataset .It run > successfully but when I opened the browser to see GUI for > tasktracker and job tracker , it shows me the following error: > > HTTP ERROR: 404 > > /jobtracker.jsp > > RequestURI=/jobtracker.jsp > > Powered by Jetty:// > > > Can anyone please help me and tell how to see results in GUI? > > > Thank you in advance, > > R.Abhilaash. > > > -- > Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... > > > ----------------------------------------- > This email was sent using TCEMail Service. > Thiagarajar College of Engineering > Madurai-625 015, India > > --00151773da305fc77804776e0fab-- From general-return-680-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 03:21:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58953 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 03:21:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 03:21:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 91137 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 03:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90904 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 03:21:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90894 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 03:21:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:21:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:21:31 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so6763175ywh.5 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:21:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VdSHMgLq4bu478AYbdAfmeLMKkVcr74lfpKcAwKFnMY=; b=Avz4j+eXxzNyfl+yB3s/COGh1sNT8UHUwg9kAOBsICkHlqCC6w5w+K4mOUwyQ/npry yMG81UV0Mgf+ojZxdB35w9EXbfA9xcAZLoZOxsy0/tkDKz/8bR5m3JQlIcMkWg2ntLju pMU0WtqfY3taA5gyATr8FbgRENF4HjniNQolU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=sCAvggpbTP66odEVeFpZJ2bu2RTb0YXwwC1b718jGrrN+seSIgjdAkHHFIhgrXUUZP U3MXKR1+lPcXlFt8p9zGT5j6U7KH+Xinwc4G7XeiBaNkq2eJgj/ijoGRP18bGhRccSfT gsclXGnRQD8GS78U7EptODMifWIeni7SgRKXg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.94.1 with SMTP id w1mr9410174ybl.214.1257218470362; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:21:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> From: goutham patnaik Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:20:50 -0800 Message-ID: <1b3669280911021920o3b2d61c6y9bda8b69ee11f406@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGS & DEBUGGING IN HADOOP To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6b2ec54bfab04776efc4c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd6b2ec54bfab04776efc4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alberto, Are you looking to write some java code that prints the contents of a file in HDFS ? If so, take a look at IOUtils.copyBytes (IOUtils is in the packag= e hadoop.io.IOUtils) As an output stream, you could just use System.out heres documentation on IOUtils: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/IOUti= ls.html hope that helps Goutham You can print the content of a file On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas wrote: > Hi everyone! In a project involving Hadoop (0.20.1) I=B4m working, I=B4d = need > to > know if I=B4m reading properly the content of a file located in the HDFS. > Beside the try...catch block, is there any other option for printing valu= es > in the console (in a similar way standard IO Java mechanisms do, like > System.out.println("the variable is ", var))? > Another thing, is there a simply way to debug Hadoop applications? > (actually > I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode, for developing purposes). > Thanks a lot in advance. > > -- > Alberto > --000e0cd6b2ec54bfab04776efc4c-- From general-return-681-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 08:21:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29648 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 08:21:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 08:21:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 95634 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 08:21:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95544 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 08:21:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95533 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 08:21:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:21:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nA38KT4b052710 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:20:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=quHtDxZQbr6sfkQUhmRdZgYhbK9/r/qUY3KIlWMxc0McZ0zptNqTpHOBWpEOAvvr Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.233]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:20:29 -0800 Received: from 10.66.79.68 ([10.66.79.68]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server egl-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.208]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:12:48 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:42:47 +0530 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: Hemanth Yamijala To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project Thread-Index: AcpcXW1cFG35dvR8o02FITQhxy4e3Q== In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2009 08:20:29.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[8112E1E0:01CA5C5E] Owen Some clarifications: In the section on "Code Change" when you mention approval as "Lazy approval and then lazy consensus", did you mean the consensus will need to come into play if a veto is received ? Also, very, very minor nit: In the section describing "Lazy Majority" " A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes that -1 votes." "that" must be "than" In general, +1, including Doug's suggested changes. Thanks hemanth On 11/3/09 1:22 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back > in Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I > looked around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and > fairly complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please > look them over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority > to approve these bylaws. > > -- Owen > > From general-return-682-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 10:05:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81818 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 10:05:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 10:05:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 47637 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 10:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47548 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 10:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47538 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 10:05:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:05:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tcenet) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N5GFm-0003p7-F4 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:34:48 +0530 Received: from 10.2.1.250 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tcenet with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:34:42 +0530 Message-ID: <98b459018b7877975c9f42e0d05dc1ab.squirrel@mail.tcenet> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:34:42 +0530 Subject: Re: Http 404 Error while viewing tasktracker in Browser From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi, The URL I typed was http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp and I'll check for the open ports. Thank you, Abhilaash. > Can you please share the URL that you typed. Also, may be the port is > blocked by the firewall, check the open ports on your system. > > Cheers > H. Kumar > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > 2009/11/2 Abhilaash > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have downloaded hadoop and configured it in my local system.I >> have >> run the wordcount program with some files as dataset .It run >> successfully but when I opened the browser to see GUI for >> tasktracker and job tracker , it shows me the following error: >> >> HTTP ERROR: 404 >> >> /jobtracker.jsp >> >> RequestURI=/jobtracker.jsp >> >> Powered by Jetty:// >> >> >> Can anyone please help me and tell how to see results in GUI? >> >> >> Thank you in advance, >> >> R.Abhilaash. >> >> >> -- >> Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> This email was sent using TCEMail Service. >> Thiagarajar College of Engineering >> Madurai-625 015, India >> >> > -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-683-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 11:04:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18069 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 11:04:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 11:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 62567 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 11:04:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62483 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 11:04:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62472 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 11:04:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:04:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:04:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAE8B7EB3 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:03:52 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Lf5YLxyrUIPT for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:03:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2964B7EB0 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:03:46 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1257851016.27367@hzejjECqm+URG7gonP+zPg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nA3B3ZKK014185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:03:35 GMT Message-ID: <4AF00E07.8050701@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:03:35 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nA3B3ZKK014185 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in > Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked > around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly > complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them > over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve > these bylaws. > silly Q, but what are "work days" in this context? Were I to propose something on, say thankgsiviing thursday day, with all the US off work until monday, we in rest of the world would leave you US folk with only monday to veto our attempts to vote something through. -steve From general-return-684-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 14:39:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81430 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 14:39:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 14:39:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 44659 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 14:39:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44560 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 14:39:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44550 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 14:39:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:39:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:38:52 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so7255855yxe.5 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:38:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LB5/KkkzfmcbQ461cngkLyNZhaLYJM5faI9L+sLa+us=; b=Uv6YC1zBBeRTUOCINJhwXf8TcDUef/w8L+UYPVOegfzhjHtqw0vZCqL2NY89rQjTyK QeG2EP6wtAu++75X3Vp8S0RMSyNrdqwXnSG5l/mK/YT5P/9nOY7Iy9vieT8qmhFbbu7C fHSCwHn7Ax0CIA5pgZMNSWKPm2JeputSPLT3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YgNgpQfGlB5CzUjvbyhXTcrJPsgUY6N8yGocBvLvsQYpa7an2poByB5cZtgKDJNouV lQcR7ir2B9a5llzXszjQXsMSjyg3YgrV8jgkFHV1ZRslXPhDu+o0cH9wW+HHvk56AxHa zh+gVvF13Y3lLYWm3msY7tE+1eFydcu+IN/RY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.81.20 with SMTP id i20mr10646mul.127.1257259110818; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:38:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1b3669280911021920o3b2d61c6y9bda8b69ee11f406@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> <1b3669280911021920o3b2d61c6y9bda8b69ee11f406@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:38:30 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d00911030638y4d9c7b5dxe737f4f13952fd34@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGS & DEBUGGING IN HADOOP From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b60a8b0e4b004777872f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b60a8b0e4b004777872f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the reply,. I=B4ll try your solution. 2009/11/3 goutham patnaik > Alberto, > > Are you looking to write some java code that prints the contents of a fil= e > in HDFS ? If so, take a look at IOUtils.copyBytes (IOUtils is in the > package > hadoop.io.IOUtils) As an output stream, you could just use System.out > > heres documentation on IOUtils: > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/IOU= tils.html > > > hope that helps > > Goutham > > You can print the content of a file > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone! In a project involving Hadoop (0.20.1) I=B4m working, I=B4= d need > > to > > know if I=B4m reading properly the content of a file located in the HDF= S. > > Beside the try...catch block, is there any other option for printing > values > > in the console (in a similar way standard IO Java mechanisms do, like > > System.out.println("the variable is ", var))? > > Another thing, is there a simply way to debug Hadoop applications? > > (actually > > I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode, for developing purposes). > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > --=20 Alberto --0016e65b60a8b0e4b004777872f0-- From general-return-685-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:02:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4365 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:02:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:02:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 77138 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:02:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77059 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:02:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77049 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 16:02:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:02:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:02:30 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4319202pzk.2 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:02:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=smiTmVKcnDeMXzrwH26nA0rrG00T83gP6cWR+kX9T2w=; b=KWtNYSRoyam6GuSyPKgPxv+Sg3z4745DjwPoP11OtRfJEhTqEQP/sfm62oJz8IPLNT 5KHh4FqiDpTEXou/AT0VOZm4wR7oEzV2v/5CokikLEK7IJMlIVzNXlYOfPA7QhKXbckE 4vBIlOXQbo5LCGWJg6zTsGEKByiUlOBLrOmok= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SswJd3JjunB+DINcH7F/Vni2J71jspwXXitH38xFddDm6hxckgSqESVkeewRQ90iDE 0AxJQEpznfosEcZtfaQdfR9aGij6KFVBFy2BOfo8KiQrk4snPf7d92nWI8Jc8UF1XGz5 Nb+QThD9kd1c6uqA6ZWIx4GgDum0F63dluS8E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.22.21 with SMTP id z21mr9151rvi.170.1257264129362; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:02:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:02:09 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0911030802l46d227bal606266ccee4a2888@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1b430d1ce6f0477799d05 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1b430d1ce6f0477799d05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > - Replace the term "developer" with "contributor". This seems more > precise and consistent with our wiki documentation. > +1 > - Emeritus timeout should be 12 months instead of 6. I considered it, but since we are setting up rules that require actual majorities, I think that if someone hasn't been responding on the list for 6 months, it is reasonable to make them emeritus if we need to. -- Owen --000e0cd1b430d1ce6f0477799d05-- From general-return-686-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:08:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6628 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:08:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 87166 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87112 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87102 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 16:08:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:08:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:08:34 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so2736794pwi.29 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:08:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CLsZLUXFgHqE6kn0OfARSISWLrNSslrbU/rPmocNLKc=; b=SmIsKYnGFiDW7+hfAECfEj4tm7q+bxC1LnS2W6lirvCmJ5lMYTFCIx5p9WJupVVjA8 VdejFYXHgj4n4RgZKuzYmG618uuKxLUUeoYEDmMOmuazTndSKqZpYlJlSS/BXCPm020I DX7U+3n9XL2bAXq6N0+n3/Vcj/5D+XGeKvhy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ilO0884RHS6bQeG/6wsUpFikqj/WvaQ/us1n1Un5MDByQDxcr7iABf2zrJY8Yi9x1s n6UMEUUuNTBVsonvCJQqQAwTvUad9ByyXo3Ciz/KGtR+51my839MI9y9PEolToNRqFj/ C5qmOU0CiMq3LX2q+DZdIYwpZ6DAD+UzHSf9A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.170.13 with SMTP id s13mr9366rve.117.1257264493142; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:08:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:08:13 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0911030808m3ac21126h1271b39d7ae30cac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2999e80a294047779b33b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2999e80a294047779b33b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > Owen > > Some clarifications: > > In the section on "Code Change" when you mention approval as "Lazy approval > and then lazy consensus", did you mean the consensus will need to come into > play if a veto is received ? > Hmm... I copied that section from Ant's bylaws. Our current practice is probably actually lazy consensus since we require a +1 before it can be committed. -- Owen --000e0cd2999e80a294047779b33b-- From general-return-687-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:10:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6930 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:10:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:10:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 91578 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:10:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91518 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91508 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 16:10:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:10:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:10:19 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so2737954pwi.29 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:09:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WiR1exqWNH32WMutiGmcxZfWMumMk+0foJxbLxA/2SM=; b=mr5ONmovvpgoHXjTd7D0wVGwLPaoyCFW4iyZm4HJLIPD9JvvFzeN6UL1T/yoJ++jAc ofqxgl1+Ycq3eaeknur/PDc33/gw6QP9744kMY4e95D6XAkjdxgo16A9nbzVcBVUKh+O 26yOjJ6qOTX8wTPzd2aB53BOdo2DeDepnOx/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DmydP8MXqqmNGz3r6ljzluoDTg48jogd6CLMqnYFM792v3md+PY4Ein0HevMkxdxxk eNeloq18gt+7Gh/5n/ZXXeukrcEyvVqn3ighfIkJ/KyT1SNcHTMa7twRfENFZpRDryMP zVAtQHwzWll1C3Yvuc9FdPW8yhNob2Peoiulo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.194.12 with SMTP id r12mr9842rvf.65.1257264599590; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:09:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AF00E07.8050701@apache.org> References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AF00E07.8050701@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:09:59 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0911030809s2e57cd57gb9e91ecb30e28cab@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2114ad8ea13047779b986 --000e0cd2114ad8ea13047779b986 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > silly Q, but what are "work days" in this context? Were I to propose > something on, say thankgsiviing thursday day, with all the US off work until > monday, we in rest of the world would leave you US folk with only monday to > veto our attempts to vote something through. > Good point! It is what we've done. The Ant bylaws actually use a week. Let's change it to a week, since that is roughly equivalent and handles all of the special cases of holidays. -- Owen --000e0cd2114ad8ea13047779b986-- From general-return-688-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:55:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22404 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:55:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 81792 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81695 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60145 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2009 17:30:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harsh.107@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KFMA4b4WMNKruxNHu08mlFu8qWFzgGJkgdCtTkNcJS8=; b=syEz6JYbKug/IJ8SBvG4TjzCsLxEuut50Ttme5vO4WsaoOxZqVlH77lsAymsiUSlMn xtM5IEyskKYq7IH473QLV1QgsNq8a3PkJFuPGXKITx3lqa5FO7DGc2EnTI0tiBJi4lIj 7Umbz0m/EQ34pMbFvT2X+jO1d/4EI8i3fSHfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AcWW0jhaiEURGVY2WiiaNfyWGy/muvVGz+d5SlwT6NRx2EZ0lPhs8gCkM9obdc1wbv vxgEAh0yOcW2C6URRYs/4Ks28ys5OL15yW/ZanOJqYnN3XNvMP15bwKG3maySKv71KpT H3H4bC49YiyYyxhJNMGzW511NyQL6WbLat8MA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:00:03 +0530 Message-ID: <2e63a6a90911010930l794e04aag7e006d7caaf1077f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGS & DEBUGGING IN HADOOP From: Harshad Shrikhande To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf195280ea0f0477529ce5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cdf195280ea0f0477529ce5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, You can read the content of a file in Hadoop Distributed File System using bin/hadoop dfs -cat file name What else do you want to do . It's simple Bye Harshad Shrikhande On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! In a project involving Hadoop (0.20.1) I=B4m working, I=B4d = need > to > know if I=B4m reading properly the content of a file located in the HDFS. > Beside the try...catch block, is there any other option for printing valu= es > in the console (in a similar way standard IO Java mechanisms do, like > System.out.println("the variable is ", var))? > Another thing, is there a simply way to debug Hadoop applications? > (actually > I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode, for developing purposes). > Thanks a lot in advance. > > -- > Alberto > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > --000e0cdf195280ea0f0477529ce5-- From general-return-689-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:55:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22511 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:55:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 82731 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82661 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68606 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2009 03:26:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=lLnYQJxbBHHUIRtZ2+8HJrrTRdM=; b=XllNyfQT4H8WwnJPIeClluVzQSkzQQMGX0engNP5cwZgUfKceAGA8Hgw27LJe916IpCobBFfelmm0ngrgdLSM8TZ/d98KPMgTlyNI0rbhheUxm/w73pSnwO6l9AGTgfjRlX3HAsK6/jUL7nq105b9RrXq+rSxKrR/T8fe2ptqJo= X-Sasl-enc: PjGho2UXsAmJnKcY3tqvkhwtaYJQNgpCLtgshU9oSPDh 1257132340 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:25:37 +1100 From: David Crossley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: assistance with Apache Forrest Message-ID: <20091102032537.GD15843@igg.indexgeo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I did some research to find the ASF projects that manage their websites with Apache Forrest, and am sending similar email to each project's dev mail list. Sent this to your general list, hoping that it will reach sub-project people too. The purposes of this email are to remind people about some of the useful facilities of Forrest, and also alert them to discussion about the status and future directions of Forrest, and to appeal for people to assist Forrest. --- oOo --- These are useful facilities to assist with developing and managing a Forrest solution for your project's website. "How to deploy documentation with the Forrestbot svn workstage" This explains how the Forrest project manages our own documentation. http://forrest.apache.org/howto-forrestbot-svn.html "Generate an ASF mirrors page using interactive web form" http://forrest.apache.org/docs/dev/howto/howto-asf-mirror.html "ForrestBar - Firefox toolbar to ease navigation and search of Forrest resources" http://forrest.apache.org/tools/forrestbar.html "How to do development with Apache Forrest" http://forrest.apache.org/howto-dev.html "Frequently Asked Questions" http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html "The Anakia output plugin" This was developed to assist the old Incubator website to stop using Forrest and export all content to an Anakia "xdoc" format. From there it could used by an Anakia-based build system, or be further transformed. http://forrest.apache.org/pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.Anakia/ As usual, if you need further assistance with anything then please ask on the Forrest mail lists. --- oOo --- There is discussion currently underway on the Forrest dev mail list about the current status and future direction of Forrest. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.forrest.devel/27325 If anyone can assist Forrest, in any capacity, then please do. -David From general-return-690-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 16:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22647 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 83534 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83447 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51386 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 05:05:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chris.douglas@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ahQrwEdTsUcZ8T4L4/UDg+9Y1rnMfRlGhAb4mupTPp4=; b=l4iG64K6jXsahGAgrHSNtK7y8PmdfC/9EPTknbGkRDeNOV2RsCIM11PjTfuCS/Nqvx PkoJWnloVQO6gRABeWlzE3hA+7WeRv+zoZfpe6chrZfwiYwFuNmdPeb02YYtofVPXtDT Bnw8W6EfX1P7sFq6bbcT/khxJB6fRkzLv4cg8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XbeHGwBMxC43vKldfh5et8HA24v5qMwR6lXqMvl+ne4bhtWF3+adChKnXFud/Gdt0B UToK6z8CBvxicXu2+RlWpsVPSfsk4mhuNhJoT9uaUto65XFFjfozwW2Fn0aGxL+9y32B M5knpWx/SovcSnqbG/NHgDCybiQcxmyQ9IK6c= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9033CE01-58E7-4753-85ED-E6DA34FF9D50@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <9033CE01-58E7-4753-85ED-E6DA34FF9D50@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:05:03 -0700 Message-ID: <1267dd3b0911022105ibc7c765r58bbf5dfb7b3ceaf@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This will be helpful. Random questions/thoughts: * The intro should also mention that Apache owns the trademark for "Hadoop", in addition to the copyright for its source. * What does it mean for code changes to have "Lazy approval and then lazy consensus"? * Most votes- particularly on releases- take longer than 3 days in practice. Late votes are usually permitted, as are vetos. Perhaps no vote can pass in fewer than 3 full business days? * Does a vetoed proposal require a new vote, or does a vote pass when all vetos are recanted? Can new objections/vetos be raised during that debate? * With consensus and 2/3 majorities, a 6 month emeritus period seems reasonable to me. However, the actions requiring them in the current document are rare (I hope), so arguing over these details may not be worthwhile. Surely we wouldn't move someone into that category without first asking them if they plan to become more active in the near term. It's important that this not be used to push people out, particularly since the 2/3 and consensus votes may be swayed by "noticing" inactive members. -C On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1 for adoption, and +1 for the two minor changes Doug proposes. > > Alan. > > On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> These look good to me. =A0+1 >> >> A few minor changes I'd prefer but not insist on: >> >> - Replace the term "developer" with "contributor". =A0This seems more >> precise and consistent with our wiki documentation. >> >> - Emeritus timeout should be 12 months instead of 6. =A0Perhaps this doe= sn't >> matter, since we're not bound to make someone emeritus after six months,= but >> events might reasonably keep someone away for six, and I think we've >> generally not bothered to make anyone emeritus until they've been idle f= or >> 12 months, so 12 months seems more descriptive of our actual practice. >> >> Thanks for proposing this! >> >> Doug >> >> Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in >>> Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked >>> around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly >>> complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them= over >>> and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these >>> bylaws. >>> -- Owen >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------= - > > From general-return-691-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 17:29:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33548 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 17:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 26766 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 17:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26681 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 17:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26671 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 17:29:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:29:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:29:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 33523 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 17:29:22 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [198.18.166.176]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:29:22 +0000 Message-ID: <4AF06870.7060102@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:29:20 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <9033CE01-58E7-4753-85ED-E6DA34FF9D50@yahoo-inc.com> <1267dd3b0911022105ibc7c765r58bbf5dfb7b3ceaf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b0911022105ibc7c765r58bbf5dfb7b3ceaf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Douglas wrote: > * Does a vetoed proposal require a new vote, or does a vote pass when > all vetos are recanted? It passes when all vetoes are recanted, in my experience. I don't see advantages to restarting the vote. > Can new objections/vetos be raised during that > debate? I think that as long as a veto is outstanding and discussion continues, the vote should be open and folks can change their votes. Once both a week has passed since voting was started and there are no outstanding vetos, the vote passes. A vote can be cancelled at any time. If there are outstanding vetoes, and a week has passed since the vote was called, and discussion has stalled, then the vote should be declared as failed. Should we be more precise about what constitutes ongoing discussion? Should we say, e.g., that, if there are no messages on the voting thread for a week and the vote has not passed, then the vote implicitly fails, and voting must be restarted if this issue is to be pursued further? > * With consensus and 2/3 majorities, a 6 month emeritus period seems > reasonable to me. However, the actions requiring them in the current > document are rare (I hope), so arguing over these details may not be > worthwhile. Surely we wouldn't move someone into that category without > first asking them if they plan to become more active in the near term. > It's important that this not be used to push people out, particularly > since the 2/3 and consensus votes may be swayed by "noticing" inactive > members. +1 I'm okay with 6 months in the bylaws. 12 months seems to be what we do in practice, and we can continue to do that even if our rules say 6 months. Doug From general-return-692-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 19:50:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93413 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 19:50:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 19:50:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 29027 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 19:49:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28947 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 19:49:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28937 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 19:49:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:49:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:49:48 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so6065725ewy.29 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=73w2vGxYu8CSzIjC2yOyw5eo8ijOj1Sdka4IL22pr60=; b=IKxpu8sbvhUGXCwXqsXf9YGzcNQqqCHvWM1ZlQSc1Y3O0S9cQz6RbWGmYYKDtZNLrD zOzbpQvwKNm7KdXpfzjqKqiCQ1yYv0USORAVua0Ep0tElsnAlVbYhDCNSLrKhu6Eutrj Xmt0smm4MhSiBkUQO2yTPdtizABLQAGHY2HyI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PPtJFD7TwBmoUc1ta0hEcNY3uRuKbhTlqGtZn0tS8DxVfQfscBwRL2aDFPe5LoAIcH qvLIVsK9sJp330cStFIeT85XYWfbUi+YwVt5+nBKNDBzDcQpX6ioBMDSbYE6De9pkTew P343QhN4K+/f60irXo2/9jLb+ROsAkhU5x6lM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.208 with SMTP id e58mr151638wef.57.1257277768058; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:49:27 +0100 Message-ID: <88f6e29a0911031149x5543cc6el7f8cce9bdf1212f0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 20:52, Owen O'Malley wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in Jan > 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked around > and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly complete. I > made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them over and vote. > In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. A VOTE thread without having a discussion thread first is unlikely to not be hijacked by detailed discussion. I think it will be more successful to collect input first and then vote on something where all important input is featured in. As soon as discussions start to evolve on a VOTE thread, nobody knows what he is/has been voting for, really. Bernd From general-return-693-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 22:45:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51427 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 22:45:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 22:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 60490 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 22:45:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60422 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 22:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60412 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 22:45:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:45:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:45:40 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nA3MipIE086365 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:44:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pa/Fxf3hIe3o12TV64onXgLVn2uLXd+goxpdzL79JpsAHxbptKgjkc9WA4BhiXJ+ Message-ID: <4AF0B263.5000204@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:44:51 -0800 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Good idea. +1 for this as a draft version. 1. Seems that Doug's corrections are more in line with the Apache Way, and current hadoop practices +1. 2. I like the definition and phrasing for emeritus in here: http://portals.apache.org/roles.html "Emeritus Committers" which says - "Any committer that has not participated in the sub-project in the last year (ie not committed anything in the sub-project repository and not posted anything in the mailing-lists) will automatically be converted to Emeritus Committer of this sub-project." - "Any Emeritus Committer of a subproject can ask to become full Committer on the sub-project development list. He or she will automatically be accepted as Committer without vote." I propose to use this exact phrasing in Hadoop bylaws. 3. Propose to add "testing" here - users on the mailing lists, documentation, etc. + users on the mailing lists, documentation, testing, etc. 4. Adoption of New Codebase: 2/3 majority; Active committers This will make very hard to create sub-projects. Should we replace it with Lazy Consensus; Active PMC members? Maintaining codebase is the 1st responsibility of PMC. --Konstantin Doug Cutting wrote: > These look good to me. +1 > > A few minor changes I'd prefer but not insist on: > > - Replace the term "developer" with "contributor". This seems more > precise and consistent with our wiki documentation. > > - Emeritus timeout should be 12 months instead of 6. Perhaps this > doesn't matter, since we're not bound to make someone emeritus after six > months, but events might reasonably keep someone away for six, and I > think we've generally not bothered to make anyone emeritus until they've > been idle for 12 months, so 12 months seems more descriptive of our > actual practice. > > Thanks for proposing this! > > Doug > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back >> in Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I >> looked around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and >> fairly complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please >> look them over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority >> to approve these bylaws. >> >> -- Owen >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> > From general-return-694-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 23:13:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60891 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 23:13:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 23:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 95576 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 23:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95506 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 23:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95496 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 23:13:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:13:35 +0000 Received: from [10.35.1.231] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c90.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.90]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nA3NCnE6033024 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:12:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=pctZz5Vq8hNHRcD2kgPTb6rU6Il244wtsd147iMTTRj8M6cpNsEQdKfK6fOb6ufn Message-Id: <2E38916E-FB50-4AD5-908A-27AD79B4E189@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b0911030809s2e57cd57gb9e91ecb30e28cab@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:12:48 -0800 References: <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AF00E07.8050701@apache.org> <5f7f740b0911030809s2e57cd57gb9e91ecb30e28cab@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:09 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Steve Loughran > wrote: > >> >> silly Q, but what are "work days" in this context? Were I to propose >> something on, say thankgsiviing thursday day, with all the US off >> work until >> monday, we in rest of the world would leave you US folk with only >> monday to >> veto our attempts to vote something through. >> > > Good point! It is what we've done. The Ant bylaws actually use a > week. Let's > change it to a week, since that is roughly equivalent and handles > all of the > special cases of holidays. Does this mean release votes will now take 1 week too? Nige From general-return-695-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 03 23:34:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69278 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 23:34:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 23:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 19636 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 23:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19532 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 23:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19522 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 23:34:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:34:21 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so8248826bwz.29 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:34:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TJQDxMvy9kkP5UhP/QA9br18SElic83ee9KQwIRUxdA=; b=UGlKnS/E/4e4waP4bypEvz+/F6iAMNlcO49Ir2sWOBeme3auqIRd6vu2wU+fsPZUxJ 1g6SS7891tJY55lLbkA5yWBMZO9mjXjgNuqhqI7pnwdfAwxf2Iiucs2Aq7nHMyR7Ud1t 2I03LATKQeUcAeT2yl3vRztJRs7eEIpoEwzD0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fUf2tW0ydodOheg3Dzz87/yrgb2dcUjwjyTOE++WDYdqWNk2GMtq/8M23SgbIOIWF4 Dav2IKQi2A4uRtrSILOv4cvVAckcUu3jmzJTZmmzYe/xgvlBRJF0lyMECOjeoK7jl1pk hAUnK1qogLm4pVEjOpJKTlokPtdIe5An1O0Ao= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr246892muf.129.1257291240034; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:34:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2e63a6a90911010930l794e04aag7e006d7caaf1077f@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00911010855q155d8efdw12eab526feac9432@mail.gmail.com> <2e63a6a90911010930l794e04aag7e006d7caaf1077f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:33:59 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d00911031533x67ee3e3fs32ff854a16ff4c2f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGS & DEBUGGING IN HADOOP From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641797dbdd2e104777fedd2 --00163641797dbdd2e104777fedd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Harshad, the point is that I want to read the content of a file in HDFS from inside my Java code to use the information (i.e. I have some file that has one number per line, so the first one is the number of iterations, the second is a loop limit, etc, and I need to read them to store them in a variable). goutham suggested "IOUtils"...I=B4ll take a look. Thanks for the reply. 2009/11/1 Harshad Shrikhande > Hi, > You can read the content of a file in Hadoop Distributed File System > using > bin/hadoop dfs -cat file name > > What else do you want to do . It's simple > > Bye > Harshad Shrikhande > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone! In a project involving Hadoop (0.20.1) I=B4m working, I=B4= d need > > to > > know if I=B4m reading properly the content of a file located in the HDF= S. > > Beside the try...catch block, is there any other option for printing > values > > in the console (in a similar way standard IO Java mechanisms do, like > > System.out.println("the variable is ", var))? > > Another thing, is there a simply way to debug Hadoop applications? > > (actually > > I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode, for developing purposes). > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > > --=20 Alberto --00163641797dbdd2e104777fedd2-- From general-return-696-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 01:54:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52364 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 01:54:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 01:54:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76450 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 01:54:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76372 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 01:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76362 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 01:54:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:54:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:54:20 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so4884546iwn.2 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:53:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VTwCCw6Bkkb927IOFcn2NPC92fK3+T5SmhQAiByEVYw=; b=OaQYoE6XMISRJdyJl5LoxJKyGjdikOYCZSJURwNehT7Xy4R4Nhqa+9kv3uOvxaQ8Tr 3FM+f8nEQUp26F30JhixciQAyHHgpz4FpYGp9aKlx+NCCp1LnPaJvVpLuiMkSvRvULUB RjIjsbjfRUfbdQUs8uY5x0+ZFUy4EjMD4Nr2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=DjELgyvBLdWoc9Tm1TMCeE/EDaR++MjJ2G7c6VMX/O3H9ec3MfeHaNJoHgMHjxj1mU DCJNzuvbbeNfalnJpmKV2l0O1+ZyszVwudtnjgwxk+HWGYLymbc2N9BreAWYMJ/uJLpP +Wep7qRq3S0YbsTxeYg/fdLdp1HSvvNIECzPY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.201 with SMTP id e9mr1337905ibz.17.1257299639671; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:53:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <98b459018b7877975c9f42e0d05dc1ab.squirrel@mail.tcenet> References: <98b459018b7877975c9f42e0d05dc1ab.squirrel@mail.tcenet> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:53:59 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Http 404 Error while viewing tasktracker in Browser From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045018102661f17047781e2a3 --005045018102661f17047781e2a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Other reasons can be hadoop jobtracker failed to start, check if namenode, secondarynamenode, task tracker, job tracker are all up or not. Cheers H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/11/3 Abhilaash > > > > Hi, > > > The URL I typed was http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp and I'll check > for the open ports. > > > Thank you, > Abhilaash. > > > > Can you please share the URL that you typed. Also, may be the port is > > blocked by the firewall, check the open ports on your system. > > > > Cheers > > H. Kumar > > skype: harshit900 > > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > > > > 2009/11/2 Abhilaash > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have downloaded hadoop and configured it in my local system.I > >> have > >> run the wordcount program with some files as dataset .It run > >> successfully but when I opened the browser to see GUI for > >> tasktracker and job tracker , it shows me the following error: > >> > >> HTTP ERROR: 404 > >> > >> /jobtracker.jsp > >> > >> RequestURI=/jobtracker.jsp > >> > >> Powered by Jetty:// > >> > >> > >> Can anyone please help me and tell how to see results in GUI? > >> > >> > >> Thank you in advance, > >> > >> R.Abhilaash. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... > >> > >> > >> ----------------------------------------- > >> This email was sent using TCEMail Service. > >> Thiagarajar College of Engineering > >> Madurai-625 015, India > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... > > > ----------------------------------------- > This email was sent using TCEMail Service. > Thiagarajar College of Engineering > Madurai-625 015, India > > --005045018102661f17047781e2a3-- From general-return-697-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 04:51:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90851 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 04:51:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 04:51:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 78052 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 04:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77740 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 04:51:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77727 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 04:51:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:51:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harshad@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:51:18 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1257915022.6916@M8YWMux39yo3ILIRx3F3pA Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA44oBA2011677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:20:21 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id nA44nwdR011567; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:58 +0530 From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to harshad@localhost using -f Received: from 172.17.11.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user harshad) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:58 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:19:58 +0530 (IST) Subject: General doubts about Google App Engine To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nA44oBA2011677 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5, No Hi, Is there any possibility of Google app Engine running Map Reduce behind its framework?. I am doing a project on Google App Engine which has to expose it into different nodes i.e into TaskTrackers, Jobtrackers. Basically I have to balance the load which exists while running any application behind the scenes. I have to assign different TaskTrackers on different machines. Does Google App Engine provide support for this? Thank You. Harshad Shrikhande -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-698-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 05:04:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93139 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 05:04:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 05:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 86816 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 05:04:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86682 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 05:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86672 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 05:04:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:04:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu designates 169.229.60.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [169.229.60.87] (HELO gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.60.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:04:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-69-181-219-249.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [69.181.219.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.3/8.13.5) with ESMTP id nA454OOa025050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:04:25 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: General doubts about Google App Engine Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Matei Zaharia X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:04:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Harshad, Is there any reason you're using App Engine instead of EC2? App Engine is designed for web sites, so in general, I think you'd have to do a lot of work to make it run MapReduce, and it wouldn't be particularly good at it. On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:49 PM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: > Hi, > Is there any possibility of Google app Engine running Map Reduce > behind > its framework?. I am doing a project on Google App Engine which has to > expose it into different nodes i.e into TaskTrackers, Jobtrackers. > Basically I have to balance the load which exists while running any > application behind the scenes. I have to assign different TaskTrackers > on different machines. Does Google App Engine provide support for > this? > > Thank You. > Harshad Shrikhande > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > From general-return-699-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 05:19:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8687 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 05:19:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 05:19:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 99455 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 05:19:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99389 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 05:19:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99379 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 05:19:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:19:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harshad@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:19:05 +0000 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1257916710.27959@KAqVIuMKThiIR5kpDPgS9w Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA45ITRv021644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:48:29 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id nA45ITdS021643; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:48:29 +0530 From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to harshad@localhost using -f Received: from 172.17.11.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user harshad) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:48:29 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <55737.172.17.11.61.1257311909.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> In-Reply-To: References: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:48:29 +0530 (IST) Subject: Re: General doubts about Google App Engine To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the IIIT Server Room for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nA45ITRv021644 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: harshad@students.iiit.ac.in X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5, No Hi, It's the sole reason I am using App Engine. I have to deploy a Web application on it using Java. The whole point is that I have to make the running of application look like it's being run on a single TaskTracker but actually, it runs on many. Thus , in short I have to expose Google App Engine into many nodes. Thank You. Harshad > Hi Harshad, > > Is there any reason you're using App Engine instead of EC2? App Engine > is designed for web sites, so in general, I think you'd have to do a > lot of work to make it run MapReduce, and it wouldn't be particularly > good at it. > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:49 PM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: > >> Hi, >> Is there any possibility of Google app Engine running Map Reduce >> behind >> its framework?. I am doing a project on Google App Engine which has to >> expose it into different nodes i.e into TaskTrackers, Jobtrackers. >> Basically I have to balance the load which exists while running any >> application behind the scenes. I have to assign different TaskTrackers >> on different machines. Does Google App Engine provide support for >> this? >> >> Thank You. >> Harshad Shrikhande >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From general-return-700-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 08:50:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58578 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 08:50:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 08:50:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 52690 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 08:50:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52602 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 08:50:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52592 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 08:50:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:50:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of avsrit2005@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.198] (HELO mail-px0-f198.google.com) (209.85.216.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:50:14 +0000 Received: by pxi36 with SMTP id 36so585086pxi.2 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:49:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=xqDtmMvWZQcgDhWkTdQ2wINfq0f5BFnCyKf3z4LKVUw=; b=EkZ/sfAzgkQggDkgpm1GNazNqyIQshnHBTEjmxg0ey401/JXhkhOcKGuTW2b1NAKIm HBg8F3x5xnDTD4Kr/BkSYIe0N/bqPdMOTRbUVlLcbv0YMpO4d7u/kGgSsq8KiZyvNys4 ePPd4g7WRVlZiHp9QvskXhmGCjhS0qcBTGFC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=l+RMacbQYC2jWqEjLGH+yETgPel9i6np47xIpGxYkNPOSe2d94Cb5TDGask3mF5erj DRXtr9XCYObSIGT7SwhrFB0R/YI7X6x7waInXV5cDOhzFhHx4WcjHUR4mOODemRSy7I7 p45qxHJ42MUuvYoFUstsjFpNDCMxIAweHD+0g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.148.11 with SMTP id v11mr67349rvd.58.1257324594734; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:49:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:19:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Too many fetch failures From: venkata subbarayudu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd22936d626a9047787b1c3 --000e0cd22936d626a9047787b1c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, I was setup a single node hadoop (hadoop-0.20.0) and is able to run that have only Map Tasks, but If a task have Map & Reduce tasks, then MapTask is thorwing exceptions saying "Too many fetch failures" and the reduceTask is not starting at all. can some one please guide whats the error is, and how to resolve this.. One thing I noted is eventhough I setup hadoop as localhost (in config files), I am seeing the IP of the machine on tasktracker,namenode logs saying TaskTracker starting on server : , instead of localhost or 127.0.0.1. and so I am understanding from where hadoop is picking up the IP of the machine. Thanks for you help in advance, Thanks, Rayudu. --000e0cd22936d626a9047787b1c3-- From general-return-701-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 10:55:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87418 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 10:55:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 10:55:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 88994 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 10:55:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88938 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 10:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88928 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 10:55:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:55:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:55:03 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4918838pzk.2 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:54:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2VMWqj2R/pKIfj37kHjSKhOBf2qCH+tYOy5O3XtB56o=; b=Dh210Mh7xb8lEfg4baWDLiRmgM9hy3dQdtKdYvN0WkySHo/RieYhYhCUUl8D7MkZxr 6H6yPcgfJy+Y9zC6HG/viadJQmSF3NmB09B6Yy2Ep5KDzFost9lYYKMqfU5WE68HXb2Y EpkE1RjGABu9Fv2afl5R6+jcBSUlvDvqACyHc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E35SnTq3KPsYlpYez45hAkUvuLUPpVEnLOIWnUPPT3uvTG6YI3uc7Me7U8wp0MAEjZ QbsbhEqbVtpq/avUJgAw+3d+Gm8qNVIvXrPneXO5uOIBZNsBNdZf1pdTheESSt2hL5TM c3NG5O87hiwU4LSL6LAO2UqmoTUYOHGh95O2g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.3.29 with SMTP id 29mr1747142wac.208.1257332083461; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:54:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <55737.172.17.11.61.1257311909.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> References: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> <55737.172.17.11.61.1257311909.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:54:43 -0800 Message-ID: <78568af10911040254h10f4cb31yd22ddb10ce85c65f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: General doubts about Google App Engine From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Google app engine has the model whereby all computation is done in the context of a HTTP request, with fairly hard limits on CPU, memory and thread resources. There is no way to create a 'daemon', or long running thread. That would defeat the horizontal scalability benefits of a system like GAE. Like the other requester said, EC2 might be more your thing. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, wrote: > Hi, > =A0 It's the sole reason I am using App Engine. I have to deploy a Web > application on it using Java. The whole point is that I have to make > the running of application look like it's being run on a single > TaskTracker but actually, it runs on many. Thus , in short I have to > expose Google App Engine into many nodes. > > > Thank You. > Harshad > >> Hi Harshad, >> >> Is there any reason you're using App Engine instead of EC2? App Engine >> is designed for web sites, so in general, I think you'd have to do a >> lot of work to make it run MapReduce, and it wouldn't be particularly >> good at it. >> >> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:49 PM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> =A0 Is there any possibility of Google app Engine running Map Reduce >>> behind >>> its framework?. I am doing a project on Google App Engine which has to >>> expose it into different nodes i.e into TaskTrackers, Jobtrackers. >>> =A0 Basically I have to balance the load which exists while running any >>> application behind the scenes. I have to assign different TaskTrackers >>> on different machines. Does Google App Engine provide support for >>> this? >>> >>> Thank You. >>> Harshad Shrikhande >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >>> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > From general-return-702-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 14:38:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52539 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 14:38:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 14:38:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 28863 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 14:38:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28789 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 14:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28778 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 14:38:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:38:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fzappert@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:38:40 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so5028900pzk.2 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=MLav0GMBu6KLzm39aVblxngZ/PVZR4ASS+Br0cy3gJ8=; b=ZicDYyi1GN2MGGHLTC7nglnY+iLigtMbJdZ6BTiSLIci2p6OEKneMslj4Ms5b1RNOe AvUom+B31hx7qf4nKe3WH71E3XXT00C1h8BSNIPRG1OgEAi510OuFMXgdZTnaNfeeNB/ WFvF2rSYiTKdm5On7tGGWkTx87rDVjCqWwnRw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date :references; b=BfK8d0ZhdLzKmYAIskDyNaocfKn9mhWIXWcj+Df9yjeeQP+A4bJN8eT+TlgtzpJcXP uWHGPa30VdQ3YO8rAC94r0OBRxFNny9ibI/HniBzfJlkX0rQmD4yxyMzV+XT4v6uENgu CqMO8UOyOU7M11B4nDtXXfPewsR1mhwuFYK+U= Received: by 10.115.115.14 with SMTP id s14mr2128487wam.189.1257345499991; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.164.88.93? ([166.205.130.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm648550pxi.5.2009.11.04.06.38.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:38:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Fred Zappert To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <55737.172.17.11.61.1257311909.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7D11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11) Subject: Re: General doubts about Google App Engine Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:38:11 -0800 References: <36701.172.17.11.61.1257310198.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> <55737.172.17.11.61.1257311909.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Hi, You can run any Java app server you like on EC2, such as Tomcat or Resin, and also take advantage of the AWS MapReduce framework. HTH, Fred Sent from my iPhone On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:18 PM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: > Hi, > It's the sole reason I am using App Engine. I have to deploy a Web > application on it using Java. The whole point is that I have to make > the running of application look like it's being run on a single > TaskTracker but actually, it runs on many. Thus , in short I have to > expose Google App Engine into many nodes. > > > Thank You. > Harshad > >> Hi Harshad, >> >> Is there any reason you're using App Engine instead of EC2? App >> Engine >> is designed for web sites, so in general, I think you'd have to do a >> lot of work to make it run MapReduce, and it wouldn't be particularly >> good at it. >> >> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:49 PM, harshad@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there any possibility of Google app Engine running Map Reduce >>> behind >>> its framework?. I am doing a project on Google App Engine which >>> has to >>> expose it into different nodes i.e into TaskTrackers, Jobtrackers. >>> Basically I have to balance the load which exists while running any >>> application behind the scenes. I have to assign different >>> TaskTrackers >>> on different machines. Does Google App Engine provide support for >>> this? >>> >>> Thank You. >>> Harshad Shrikhande >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >>> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > From general-return-703-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 15:40:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73415 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 15:40:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 15:40:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45040 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 15:40:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44977 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 15:40:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44967 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 15:40:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:40:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:40:44 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tce.edu) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N5hxa-0006Op-3s for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:09:58 +0530 Received: from 59.92.117.60 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tce.edu with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:09:46 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <98b459018b7877975c9f42e0d05dc1ab.squirrel@mail.tcenet> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:09:46 +0530 Subject: Re: Http 404 Error while viewing tasktracker in Browser From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi, The Jobtracker has failed to start so only I had that error.Now it is working and I can view the GUI. Thank you, R.Abhilaash. > Hi > > Other reasons can be hadoop jobtracker failed to start, check if namenode, > secondarynamenode, task tracker, job tracker are all up or not. > > Cheers > H. Kumar > Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 > Phone(Office): +82-31- > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > 2009/11/3 Abhilaash > >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> The URL I typed was http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp and I'll >> check >> for the open ports. >> >> >> Thank you, >> Abhilaash. >> >> >> > Can you please share the URL that you typed. Also, may be the port is >> > blocked by the firewall, check the open ports on your system. >> > >> > Cheers >> > H. Kumar >> > skype: harshit900 >> > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com >> > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com >> > >> > >> > 2009/11/2 Abhilaash >> > >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I have downloaded hadoop and configured it in my local system.I >> >> have >> >> run the wordcount program with some files as dataset .It run >> >> successfully but when I opened the browser to see GUI for >> >> tasktracker and job tracker , it shows me the following error: >> >> >> >> HTTP ERROR: 404 >> >> >> >> /jobtracker.jsp >> >> >> >> RequestURI=/jobtracker.jsp >> >> >> >> Powered by Jetty:// >> >> >> >> >> >> Can anyone please help me and tell how to see results in GUI? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you in advance, >> >> >> >> R.Abhilaash. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... >> >> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> >> This email was sent using TCEMail Service. >> >> Thiagarajar College of Engineering >> >> Madurai-625 015, India >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> This email was sent using TCEMail Service. >> Thiagarajar College of Engineering >> Madurai-625 015, India >> >> > -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-704-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 04 23:28:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9232 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 22:40:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2009 22:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 92466 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 22:40:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92373 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2009 22:40:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68335 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2009 20:08:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ptarjan@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cUpVM+eHOa22BxEBFFOjKzh+0+FSCbA/+yk38Gca644=; b=RXe36AIsziXwwGQquO43Wi6HxGx9SoYMJ2AL+u3EYNwLWELy7fefVZvnSvXmtjRPjc 5VM3MNkKqpvTFznEhZgXx57zyhkHJDvKu8PvmqW47QiHvL2H+v5vCmPcJbgxMS5zeCcW 5wSAbWobJoX9QIF+vHInzf+PS8B9YPuzPDaac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=rW/o30ODs/2Rw2udml6Cr3qx8K92gX0mqVnYwo1WYpWsOj8b2S7INqn+EiHYVQZUcy ek6FybgCt0BrE+o8vVcvdAF8CFrqG4ecQPHZp9/KYa2ej2yQx7Qay5CcisAmB3cD9NNc RWVVoBrAoJaVYvEAtxVNip2at2tt1MgySwdYg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ptarjan@gmail.com Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:07:53 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1075ee41898a28bb Message-ID: <815c8c330911041207p1689d6b2u378d52c0142afe84@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Python CSV record reader From: Paul Tarjan To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I wrote a CSV Jute record parser in python, and thought some people on the list might also be interested. http://github.com/ptarjan/hadoop_record You can use it in your streaming jobs with -inputformat SequenceFileAsTextInputFormat -file hadoop_record.mod And just showing some features: >>> from hadoop_record import csv >>> csv("T") True >>> csv(";-1234") -1234 >>> csv("1.0E-10") 1e-10 >>> csv("s{T,F}") [True, False] >>> csv("v{T,F}") [True, False] >>> csv("v{s{T,F}}") [[True, False]] >>> csv("m{'don't,#73746f70}") {LazyString("don't"): LazyString('stop')} >>> csv("'\xe2\x98\x83") LazyString('\xe2\x98\x83') >>> str(csv("'\xe2\x98\x83")) '\xe2\x98\x83' >>> unicode(csv("'\xe2\x98\x83")) u'\u2603' >>> csv("'%00%0a%25%2c") LazyString('\x00\n%,') The LazyString was needed because I was spending most of my CPU just decoding data from the Jute record that I didn't care about. It shouldn't get in your way too much, as long as you cast it to a str first. So let me know what you think. For bugs, fork, fix, and then send me a pull request (or use the issues tracker). Paul From general-return-705-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 05 10:48:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17274 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 10:48:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 10:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 713 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 10:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 10:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 622 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 10:48:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:48:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:48:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B140B7F9D for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:47:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id K5V69-IJq7tY for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:47:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84DAB7F9A for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:47:46 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1258022856.62668@yp6pJuZeicLvwGZHqPVGRA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nA5AlZdL026346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <4AF2AD47.40908@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:47:35 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <4AF0B263.5000204@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF0B263.5000204@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nA5AlZdL026346 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > 3. Propose to add "testing" here > - users on the mailing lists, documentation, etc. > + users on the mailing lists, documentation, testing, etc. and bugreps > > 4. Adoption of New Codebase: 2/3 majority; Active committers > This will make very hard to create sub-projects. > Should we replace it with Lazy Consensus; Active PMC members? > Maintaining codebase is the 1st responsibility of PMC. > good point, this is probably PMC level issues, maybe 2/3 PMC -it's a fairly big decision and assuming the PMC is small enough, majority isn't that hard to organise. It's harder with committers, who can come and go based on personal whim/work committments From general-return-706-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 05 11:07:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21631 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 11:07:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 11:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 28065 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 11:07:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28015 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 11:07:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28005 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 11:07:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:07:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:07:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020FAB7F9F for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:07:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vGV3WSPFSxa0 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:07:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257DDB7FA0 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:07:15 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1258024025.84772@wPRGB82aTRlReyrwSUgAGw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nA5B73LT026872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:07:03 GMT Message-ID: <4AF2B1D7.7090907@apache.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:07:03 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <5f7f740b0911030808m3ac21126h1271b39d7ae30cac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b0911030808m3ac21126h1271b39d7ae30cac@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nA5B73LT026872 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wrote: > >> Owen >> >> Some clarifications: >> >> In the section on "Code Change" when you mention approval as "Lazy approval >> and then lazy consensus", did you mean the consensus will need to come into >> play if a veto is received ? >> > > Hmm... I copied that section from Ant's bylaws. Our current practice is > probably actually lazy consensus since we require a +1 before it can be > committed. > Ant works with commit-then-discuss, nobody works on it for a living, it's all voluntary, and the rate of change of the codebase is fairly low. There's little bureaucracy overhead to encourage code contribs -and every deverloper is expected to look at the commit log to see what is going on. what's not spelled out in Ant's docs are that the architecture of the system is very compartmentalised, where it's obvious from the source files what's going to break, so just by looking at the source filenames you can guess what the issues will be -optional obscure SCM tasks: any changes here are welcome -other optional stuff: those classes and subclasses may break, if they are used a lot review carefully -junit : all the CI servers, lots of hate mail -java, exec, : how code runs, lots of CI builds fail, many complaints, the IDE teams stop sending you xmas cards. - et al. complex, discuss first, tread carefully and worry about memory consumption -IntrospectionHelper, TaskAdapter, the code that maps from XML to java; you have to really know what you are doing before going near this code, and unless the rest of the team trusts you, you won't get a lookin. Nobody touches this stuff without lots of discussion, more tests etc as it breaks everything -Classpath work. Everyone worries about this, nobody really understands it. Anyone who says they do is probably misguided. Because of that hierarchy, you can get a vague idea of where trouble will be without even reading the diffs, just looking at the subject lines, and if you get people with problems on optional tasks to start providing tests then patches, you get them fixing the problem and sucked into the task of codebase maintenance. -steve From general-return-707-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 05 12:28:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36913 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16329 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16249 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16233 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of avsrit2005@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:28:19 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so4093158pwi.29 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:27:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eRPjAChzi/CdxkJ6KyYvPBChrx3MdMLXYnE4WZFuZVU=; b=Skao9BxXNUL2vMYhP90o3AV8uNEdmKjoOSqyrG3ZtDvKJRvrKUSlrBvUe4CS/97opW rGWR/suboqUsVu78Rj4mVS5Ro6nBQf2Y+vhzH3SCkgUnYKmnieOhNGuoRdy5bidYSbbG aUCu/sjf09TrXcYMLajw00EC9sl02NgFEN/X8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HLX1eJOILeqf6UB96msgU8QVJTVypPXXCxFUG9TO1RQdfO3JU5PmKk3aXQlUxSw8Wx XxvcyFKsDVEFTLR7xADMoMjeOXwcy4S6Zcx8Pv9PHg0jx+/sB4SlLQ/NvFd0IUqNjLNs zjoHizRbxDzMqboxhlwJ/cnPuUx+3YOhtBxOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.3.4 with SMTP id f4mr164506rvi.104.1257424077440; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:27:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:57:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop : Too many fetch failures -- Reducer doesn't start From: venkata subbarayudu To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1136277c71604779edbef X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1136277c71604779edbef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All - I have setup a 'single node hadoop' (hadoop-version 0.20.0) one localhost by following the instructions from ' http://www.michael-noll.com/wiki/Running_Hadoop_On_Ubuntu_Linux_(Single-Node_Cluster)' . (i.e. master&slave nodes are 'localhost'.) I was able to run MapReduce tasks with no problems in a standalone system, and now I am trying to setup the same on a different system, and this system has two IP addresses, the new setup looks fine (because all the hadoop processes like datanode, namenode, secondarynamenode, tasktracker, jobtracker were started). and I'm able to run Hadoop Jobs that have only Mapper Tasks. but for Jobs that have Map&Reduce tasks, Hadoop Map Task is throwing '*Too Many fetch failures*', exception. Can Somebody please suggest and give any insights on how the problem can be resolved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think, the reason for this exception is that, some how the Reducer task is not able to read o/p of MapperTask, and this communication happens over a dns that was specified by the following properties in hadoop-spec [Please see the config file below]. *hdfs-site.xml* dfs.datanode.dns.interface default The name of the Network Interface from which a data node should report its IP address. dfs.datanode.dns.nameserver default The host name or IP address of the name server (DNS) which a DataNode should use to determine the host name used by the NameNode for communication and display purposes. *mapred-site.xml* mapred.tasktracker.dns.interface default The name of the Network Interface from which a task tracker should report its IP address. mapred.tasktracker.dns.nameserver default The host name or IP address of the name server (DNS) which a TaskTracker should use to determine the host name used by the JobTracker for communication and display purposes. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our Server has 2 IP addresses and the hadoop-user can access the system using 2nd IP. I believe, As the value specified above is "default" --> hadoop gets the localhost hostname and uses this(IP1) for further communication.As the hadoop-user is not allowed to access the system using the IP1, the communication fails, and the Map/Reduce Task is not able to report/read the hdfs-data. which caused Hadoop to throw 'Too Many Fetch failures' exception. please correct me If the above explanation is incorrect, quick reply is much appreciated. Thanks, Rayudu. --000e0cd1136277c71604779edbef-- From general-return-708-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 05 20:31:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19858 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 20:31:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 20:31:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 1703 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 20:31:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1615 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 20:31:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1605 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 20:31:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:31:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:31:37 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so406885yxe.5 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:31:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cs460NudNuCQJBgyf/4s/iV2GvavoCEhykKj0/fg+S8=; b=S1LHFOYLb2jTLzK0hrvfKIRDazP7GdsW89q+ufYT5afwEY0d2wR/ivQs3PeSjtirxW WNYBtIveF37zGtHfT8JUSkf5YKiaWHC2QZVBz69tl/gI5tO/cyreN0EV9VZrm1BLqEWO yUv/jGmfjXPRCDSUzitMDXVKt5YpRYsq9hr8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Rnz+a5MCGIbmGmuFQ9R0awT0sc+j1Z867KwdecZFqeT8t3h2f63mb51evvmh3XzG1B 9Mao+13OFxSMWhiEQ0d6f0RIsuHIuxLA1AJgYnB99osYkLjWJsUMYZCyQqjKd1C9uExU GBMry/NTBDiwghmnjLa3GXvoYrbsYKB3uyPAw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.88.18 with SMTP id q18mr6001405ybl.307.1257453073696; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:31:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AF2AD47.40908@apache.org> References: <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <4AF0B263.5000204@yahoo-inc.com> <4AF2AD47.40908@apache.org> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:31:13 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70911051231h620d2e82od0b4fd5f23306916@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd648ccc78b0e0477a59b2a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd648ccc78b0e0477a59b2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From my understanding, the section related to "Adoption of a new CodeBase" refer to wholesale replacement of existing codebase with a new one. For that operation, this document proposes to have a 2/3 majority. It does not apply to creating new "contrib" modules inside an existing project. Creating new contrib modules within an existing project has the same requirements as needed by any bug-fix (i.e. "Lazy approval") Just for fun (no offense to anybody), does anybody know the procedure to impeach the Chair of the PMC :-)? thanks, dhruba > >> 4. Adoption of New Codebase: 2/3 majority; Active committers >> This will make very hard to create sub-projects. >> Should we replace it with Lazy Consensus; Active PMC members? >> Maintaining codebase is the 1st responsibility of PMC. >> >> > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd648ccc78b0e0477a59b2a-- From general-return-709-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 05 23:25:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89567 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2009 23:25:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2009 23:25:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 90232 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 23:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90151 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2009 23:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90141 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2009 23:25:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:25:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.243] (HELO QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:25:09 +0000 Received: from OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43]) by QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1WJv1d0060vyq2s5DbQppL; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:24:49 +0000 Received: from [10.12.10.255] ([216.75.233.114]) by OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1bQg1d0062UlRY83RbQj2E; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:24:47 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70911051231h620d2e82od0b4fd5f23306916@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:24:37 -0800 References: <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> <4AEF43F3.5070703@apache.org> <4AF0B263.5000204@yahoo-inc.com> <4AF2AD47.40908@apache.org> <4aa34eb70911051231h620d2e82od0b4fd5f23306916@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 5, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > Just for fun (no offense to anybody), does anybody know the > procedure to > impeach the Chair of the PMC :-)? The same way we remove any uppity PMC members. *smile* (Consensus - 1) -- Owen From general-return-710-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 02:04:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39682 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 02:04:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 02:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 67287 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 02:04:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67217 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 02:04:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67207 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 02:04:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:04:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:04:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 39588 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 02:04:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:04:33 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so697418bwz.29 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:04:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.203 with SMTP id p11mr3874583bkw.180.1257473071578; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:04:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:04:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b0911051804jc8d915bqba0b2d235a8e289e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project (was: [VOTE]) From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think Bernd's prediction has come true: it's no longer clear what form of the bylaws we're voting on. Quick summary: Proposed, uncontroversial (or at least seconded) modifications to the origi= nal: * Change "3 business days" to "1 week" for votes * Change "Developer" to "Contributor" * Change "Lazy approval then lazy consensus" to simply "Lazy consensus" for source modifications * Add "testing" and "bug reports" to explicit forms of contributions from U= sers Still open/vague: * State changes to/from emeritus status for committers and PMC members * Inactive status for 6 months vs 1 year * Vote of the PMC required to restore status to a) Committer b) PMC * Definition of "adopt a new codebase" * When to close a vote that has been vetoed --- I agree with Dhruba's definition of "new codebase" as it concerns contrib and second Konstantin's interpretation requiring a 2/3 vote of the PMC for new subprojects. Concerning vetoes: the advantages to restarting the vote would be to explicitly reassert its content (as in this thread) or to notify those who withheld their objections because they were redundant for the outcome. I don't know if it needs to be written into the bylaws, but a few days after a veto has been recanted (assuming its premise wasn't mistaken) seems appropriate to me. The context matters a great deal, so I hope we can trust in the discretion of the person who called the vote. Restoring a committer/PMC member from emeritus should always require a vote, with the same rules as those new to the role. Asking the person after an unexplained, idle 6 months and- on request- extending the grace period to 12 before automatically moving them sounds fair. That leaves "no response" as a reasonable criterion for moving an inactive member, so decisions are not blocked for lapses in participation. -C On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 20:52, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in = Jan >> 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked arou= nd >> and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly complete.= I >> made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them over and vot= e. >> In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. > > A VOTE thread without having a discussion thread first is unlikely to > not be hijacked by detailed discussion. > I think it will be more successful to collect input first and then > vote on something where all important input is featured in. > As soon as discussions start to evolve on a VOTE thread, nobody knows > what he is/has been voting for, really. > > =A0Bernd > From general-return-711-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 18:43:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40125 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 18:43:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 18:43:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 52662 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 18:43:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52263 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 18:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28098 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 17:21:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <4AF45AE4.7090506@crs4.it> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:20:36 +0100 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: pydoop -- Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everybody, we recently released pydoop, a Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop: http://pydoop.sourceforge.net It is implemented as a Boost.Python wrapper around the C++ code (pipes and libhdfs). It allows you to write complete MapReduce application in CPython, with the same capabilities as the C++ API. Here is a minimal wordcount example: from pydoop.pipes import Mapper, Reducer, Factory, runTask class WordCountMapper(Mapper): def __init__(self, context): super(WordCountMapper, self).__init__(context) def map(self, context): words = context.getInputValue().split() for w in words: context.emit(w, "1") class WordCountReducer(Reducer): def __init__(self, context): super(WordCountReducer, self).__init__(context) def reduce(self, context): s = 0 while context.nextValue(): s += int(context.getInputValue()) context.emit(context.getInputKey(), str(s)) runTask(Factory(WordCountMapper, WordCountReducer)) Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. -- Simone Leo Distributed Computing group Advanced Computing and Communications program CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simleo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-712-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 18:57:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52729 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 18:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 18:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 84213 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 18:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84140 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 18:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84130 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 18:57:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:57:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 52675 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 18:57:20 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:57:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4AF4717D.4090106@apache.org> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:57:01 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project References: <4ACCBEE7.3070105@apache.org> <4ACE1292.6000702@apache.org> <4ADE4055.3020002@yahoo-inc.com> <5764186A-DA78-412B-ADD4-5A9F50866732@yahoo-inc.com> <4AEB7728.3000008@yahoo-inc.com> <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <284E0999-F935-47A2-B051-7241BF8A4B39@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm concerned about the use of majority voting. For example, we've always conducted release votes as if by consensus: 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes are required. This proposes to change this to "Lazy majority". Changing anything from consensus to majority risks a tyranny of the majority. Currently about 2/3 of the Hadoop PMC share an employer. Issues that I believe we've previously handled with consensus that would move to some kind of majority are: - Release Plan - Release - Adoption of New Codebase (e.g. subprojects) - Modifying Bylaws I'd prefer we keep these consensus or consensus-but-one. As long as we maintain sufficient PMC diversity (at least three legally independent parties) consensus-but-one would prevent any single entity from controlling a vote. As long as we keep PMC removal consensus-but-one, everything else could be consensus: if an individual is consistently blocking project progress with vetos, then they can be removed from the PMC, unless their removal would create a PMC with fewer than three legally independent entities. Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in > Jan 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked > around and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly > complete. I made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them > over and vote. In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve > these bylaws. > > -- Owen > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > From general-return-713-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 19:17:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63083 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 19:17:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 19:17:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19525 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 19:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19438 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 19:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19428 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 19:17:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:17:12 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nA6JG5Ce001050 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:16:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=L7tkSsYbFEJafd76Hmnu88ZVZ2u85Ajxq+JrcrywsSL3G9C+8OKoZfgo92Lt13ca Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.185]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:16:07 -0800 Received: from 10.72.106.176 ([10.72.106.176]) by SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.166]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.248]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:15:10 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:15:04 -0800 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Kan Zhang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpfFXGzHDDYZuExJk2eFgwdaqI7ag== In-Reply-To: <4AD5FE4E.4040100@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2009 19:16:07.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[978B4840:01CA5F15] On 10/14/09 9:37 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Kan Zhang wrote: >> One problem I see with using HTTP is that it's expensive to provide data >> encryption. We're currently adding 2 authentication mechanisms (Kerberos and >> DIGEST-MD5) to our existing RPC. Both of them can provide data encryption >> for subsequent communication over the authenticated channel. However, when >> similar authentication mechanisms are specified for HTTP (SPNEGO and HTTP >> DIGEST, respectively), they don't provide data encryption (correct me if I'm >> wrong). For data encryption over HTTP, one has to use SSL, which is >> expensive. > > Java supports using Kerberos-based encryption for TLS (nee SSL): > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jsse/JSSERefGuide.html#KRB > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2712 > Thanks for pointing this out. I did a little testing on it. It seems that when you use Kerberos cipher suites with SSL, the Kerberos service name for a TLS server has to be literally "host." For example, a TLS server running on the machine mach1.imc.org in the Kerberos realm IMC.ORG must use host/mach1.imc.org@IMC.ORG as its Kerberos principal name. I couldn't find a way to specify a different service name. Can someone confirm this? This can be a limitation since we typically run DN and TT on the same set of nodes. Kan From general-return-714-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 19:55:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78681 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 19:55:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 19:55:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 96993 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 19:55:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96916 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 19:55:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96906 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 19:55:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:55:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ptarjan@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.153] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:55:40 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so390313fga.11 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:55:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:user-agent:date:subject:from :to:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O7s8IDrsujK3rKIcaSDgqZzQWMQiDmBtRwhAoohGfBI=; b=YG6PdfycOmCBp48n1zZxkrwCch2JuU/bZEFcLIN5V3vFmsyczKt78CqTeBxdX35O88 I1tkOU2BlRWvO2L4coPUgdGPUtI4zi6R48KrY+7+XKCX279QJCaBtmvnUiJ1RXkIDMtO SaZWGOffekjgGMxaDkE1OdwkwW2PzlGMgytP4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Yzo3lizFsqlHurgmNh7yZaSdeYopaopH3khhsGb304f1QYWp+B7+iuUpTRqt4LXESp YkCcH8Alxz+7YvHCoz88Pya2B4ZJDPDNAjumuZyzke6v1uvV3tWfKeN4Xlt3bX2YpOvw q1K4FqPcSqzwoOK9pMiK2Z8+U5A0BL9kw9HtY= Received: by 10.86.106.21 with SMTP id e21mr6010683fgc.67.1257537319767; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.72.115.102? (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm1026309fgb.2.2009.11.06.11.55.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:55:18 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:55:13 -0800 Subject: Re: pydoop -- Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop From: Paul Tarjan To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: pydoop -- Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop Thread-Index: AcpfGw2TGX7xA0ocXU+hQj7Pt0UGNg== In-Reply-To: <4AF45AE4.7090506@crs4.it> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cool. Try reading a CSV Jute record with http://github.com/ptarjan/hadoop_record And let me know if it works in CPython in your framework. Paul On 11/6/09 9:20 AM, "Simone Leo" wrote: > Hello everybody, > > we recently released pydoop, a Python MapReduce and HDFS API for Hadoop: > > http://pydoop.sourceforge.net > > It is implemented as a Boost.Python wrapper around the C++ code (pipes > and libhdfs). It allows you to write complete MapReduce application in > CPython, with the same capabilities as the C++ API. Here is a minimal > wordcount example: > > > from pydoop.pipes import Mapper, Reducer, Factory, runTask > > class WordCountMapper(Mapper): > > def __init__(self, context): > super(WordCountMapper, self).__init__(context) > > def map(self, context): > words = context.getInputValue().split() > for w in words: > context.emit(w, "1") > > class WordCountReducer(Reducer): > > def __init__(self, context): > super(WordCountReducer, self).__init__(context) > > def reduce(self, context): > s = 0 > while context.nextValue(): > s += int(context.getInputValue()) > context.emit(context.getInputKey(), str(s)) > > runTask(Factory(WordCountMapper, WordCountReducer)) > > > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. From general-return-715-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 21:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12140 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 21:07:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 21:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 85776 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 21:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85670 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 21:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85660 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 21:07:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:07:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:06:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 11977 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 21:06:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:06:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4AF48FD5.6070307@apache.org> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:06:29 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kan Zhang wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. I did a little testing on it. It seems that > when you use Kerberos cipher suites with SSL, the Kerberos service name for > a TLS server has to be literally "host." For example, a TLS server running > on the machine mach1.imc.org in the Kerberos realm IMC.ORG must use > host/mach1.imc.org@IMC.ORG as its Kerberos principal name. I couldn't find a > way to specify a different service name. Can someone confirm this? This can > be a limitation since we typically run DN and TT on the same set of nodes. This is unfortunate. It looks to be part of the specification. BTW, I found an approach to Kerberos over HTTP bypassing SPNEGO: http://beamdocs.fnal.gov/DocDB/0019/001987/001/KMJ3_1-guide.pdf Starting on page 13, he suggests having an applet that the browser loads to create a ticket. The ticket is created by the user's browser talking directly to Kerberos. Then the ticket can be used in subsequent requests to identify the user. An application using HTTP could similarly contact Kerberos directly to create tickets that are sent with requests. No multi-step HTTP handshake is thus required. Doug From general-return-716-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 06 21:26:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17815 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2009 21:26:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2009 21:26:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 8986 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 21:26:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8908 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2009 21:26:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8898 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 21:26:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:26:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:26:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 17762 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2009 21:26:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:26:16 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1650642bwz.29 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:26:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.25 with SMTP id u25mr5147785bkw.129.1257542774071; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:26:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b0911051804jc8d915bqba0b2d235a8e289e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b0911051804jc8d915bqba0b2d235a8e289e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:26:14 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b0911061326h32448ff6r28e383be345264a4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project (was: [VOTE]) From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sent from the wrong address. -C ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chris Douglas Date: Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:04 PM Subject: Re: Proposed bylaws for the Hadoop project (was: [VOTE]) To: general@hadoop.apache.org I think Bernd's prediction has come true: it's no longer clear what form of the bylaws we're voting on. Quick summary: Proposed, uncontroversial (or at least seconded) modifications to the origi= nal: * Change "3 business days" to "1 week" for votes * Change "Developer" to "Contributor" * Change "Lazy approval then lazy consensus" to simply "Lazy consensus" for source modifications * Add "testing" and "bug reports" to explicit forms of contributions from U= sers Still open/vague: * State changes to/from emeritus status for committers and PMC members =A0* Inactive status for 6 months vs 1 year =A0* Vote of the PMC required to restore status to a) Committer b) PMC * Definition of "adopt a new codebase" * When to close a vote that has been vetoed --- I agree with Dhruba's definition of "new codebase" as it concerns contrib and second Konstantin's interpretation requiring a 2/3 vote of the PMC for new subprojects. Concerning vetoes: the advantages to restarting the vote would be to explicitly reassert its content (as in this thread) or to notify those who withheld their objections because they were redundant for the outcome. I don't know if it needs to be written into the bylaws, but a few days after a veto has been recanted (assuming its premise wasn't mistaken) seems appropriate to me. The context matters a great deal, so I hope we can trust in the discretion of the person who called the vote. Restoring a committer/PMC member from emeritus should always require a vote, with the same rules as those new to the role. Asking the person after an unexplained, idle 6 months and- on request- extending the grace period to 12 before automatically moving them sounds fair. That leaves "no response" as a reasonable criterion for moving an inactive member, so decisions are not blocked for lapses in participation. -C On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 20:52, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> We should have created bylaws when we were established as a PMC back in = Jan >> 2008, but it has become clear that we need to define them. I looked arou= nd >> and the Ant project had bylaws that were both clear and fairly complete.= I >> made some minor edits to match what we do. Please look them over and vot= e. >> In a recursive usage, let's use 2/3 majority to approve these bylaws. > > A VOTE thread without having a discussion thread first is unlikely to > not be hijacked by detailed discussion. > I think it will be more successful to collect input first and then > vote on something where all important input is featured in. > As soon as discussions start to evolve on a VOTE thread, nobody knows > what he is/has been voting for, really. > > =A0Bernd > From general-return-717-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 07 14:50:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18670 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2009 14:50:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2009 14:50:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 34899 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2009 14:50:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34826 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2009 14:50:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34816 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2009 14:50:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:50:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:50:31 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1253070pxi.5 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:50:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=JlH21olt6GvdwAUUSjvACFm5hFnKWGDq/k10uaRDJAs=; b=KdMvjjmTSDX0GkiGe1gKvr0Eg/hjuMxr7btOUdqupYhc4XurHU8oSWkPMTtP/+wjBp oAyHetptcUi715V/DwAh13YqlNrVC1nTHxQeHtb+t+Aj0pBfmj4wDyu8RN4o+UK8dEgy gEHQG3WkjOKOWkn3fy8Ab27qLBusn3FqIttYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=tBwVOKitsgi9idJNPNXB1+YrAujIV4rloyx1Y5iXhYMiZHHxXrgam5y00A6b0jdqdo r309sLq4GIEhAxi6/TcKH1Xd2pmiEId3bDA9zPz781mcBmr+CIjsDd1YwJIpLyiEFNuw T9fL6F/pgOHkYGbERF5dyLQkDd9A0oRbd9tfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.249.19 with SMTP id w19mr594140wfh.199.1257605411383; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:50:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:50:11 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350911070650p37e7e878jf4205c307ac296fb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: PiEstimator example in my env.(pseudo distributed) run jar works; .class works for local, but doesn't work for non-local(couldn't find class), Need help! From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ce82d029510477c913ed --00504502ce82d029510477c913ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (1)I copied PiEstimator in my env. and build a runnable jar, run the hadoop jar , it works with correct result (2) I generated .class in the direcotry ../bin PiEstimator.class PiEstimator$HaltonSequence.class PiEstimator$PiMapper.class PiEstimator$PiReducer.class (3) when I add the ../bin path into the -classpath and try to run (I use pseudo distributed config) with following error information java.lang.RuntimeException: Error in configuring object at org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils.setJobConf(ReflectionUtils.java:93) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils.setConf(ReflectionUtils.java:64) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils.newInstance(ReflectionUtils.java:117) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:354) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:307) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils.setJobConf(ReflectionUtils.java:88) ... 5 more Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: mypackage.examples.PiEstimator$PiMapper (4) I run . class with additional options: -fs file:/// -jt local , the result is correct . I guess the -classpath doesn't be included in the map or reduce task, which make .class couldn't be found. Not sure how I could make it found. Thanks in advance --00504502ce82d029510477c913ed-- From general-return-718-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 09 17:39:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32639 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2009 17:39:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2009 17:39:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 56047 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2009 17:39:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55981 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2009 17:39:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55971 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2009 17:39:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.149] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:14 +0000 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nA9HVoCp009230 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:31:51 -0700 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nA9HcNjI088194 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:38:27 -0700 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nA9HcNXn030203 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:38:23 -0700 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id nA9Hc96K029790 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:38:22 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Hadoop Release Schedule X-KeepSent: 027C9CF7:0E8714C6-86257669:005DFCE0; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:36:49 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 11/09/2009 10:38:22, Serialize complete at 11/09/2009 10:38:22 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0060C04986257669_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0060C04986257669_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" If one goes to the Hadoop-Common JIRA and clicks on the RoadMap Option and selects "All Versions" as the scope, one is able to see the different releases being worked on. In some cases in the past, I've seen what I construe to be release dates next the Release Heading. For example, Hadoop 0.21.0 has 05/June/09 next to it. Are these dates effectively a stake in the ground for the community to work towards ? Is this report the definitive location to identify how close a particular tagged release is to being made generally available ? The way it appears to me is that once all the issues tagged for a particular release are closed and the release appears to work well in system testing (done independently by the community), a vote is taken and the release is made available. i.e. a release date that is driven more by the closure of open issues and features than a particular date the community is working towards. Is that correct ? It seems in the past that there has been a release about every 3 months. Lastly, what about releases that appear to have been passed by, such as 0.18.4 ? Kind regards Steve Watt --=_alternative 0060C04986257669_=-- From general-return-719-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 05:27:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29104 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 05:27:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 05:27:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 42227 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 05:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42148 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 05:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42138 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 05:27:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:27:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:27:19 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so879247pwi.29 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:26:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=laJfCckYhbCGLNdzmAu6mr6Btzf1x5UylUY85LycPsE=; b=A5haiL2dCzyyEuXUcVoAGWxuClAbnLxAwxLG1Gbn8UJoxT/wg64Bp2hfM5ADoDS90J N2VNneB5G5w4cS4LfCvcvZuQpAIOL3wBPWs0N53f1kLOijH9oM+B64dEepeYQ8V9+asa tLFxvDHIKbLHoR84TxLYsko7kJK515PknZ3Cc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SfcHdWU5gMH7t7fJ2x+siCU1MHvSrPQtjDYYbUHCUhU0od1ExwMGw+N6KI935JUU0H JFVNTnhFtQ8BweuUC9KbJVC0LL70rjkA1eKtOTpUieb6nWuYIpdiD3XAxPDkXMWRlJGv lJ6jxzxBm2fdLMqrFIUVNQWRTsfFxu4DU1vrk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.20.42 with SMTP id x42mr891109wfi.225.1257830818554; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:26:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:26:58 -0800 Message-ID: <39b0afc00911092126k5a77ed1dw5a30adbf9cae3407@mail.gmail.com> Subject: ANNOUNCE: Chukwa 0.3 released From: Ariel Rabkin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Howdy all. The Chukwa development team is very pleased to announce our first public release, Chukwa 0.3. Chukwa is a log collection framework designed to facilitate large-scale log storage and processing with Hadoop. Chukwa has been tested at scale and used in several production settings, and is reasonably robust and well behaved. See http://hadoop.apache.org/chukwa/docs/r0.3.0/ for an overview of Chukwa and http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/chukwa/ for download links. And feel free to email chukwa-user@hadoop.apache.org with any questions or concerns. --Ari -- Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com UC Berkeley Computer Science Department From general-return-720-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 06:20:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48834 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 06:20:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 06:20:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 70052 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 06:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69887 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 06:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69802 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 06:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.199.18.82] (HELO mail1.impetus.co.in) (203.199.18.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:20:24 +0000 Received: from mail1.impetus.co.in ([192.168.100.28]) by mail1.impetus.co.in ([192.168.100.28]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:50:02 +0530 From: Sanjay Sharma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:49:45 +0530 Subject: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Topic: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Index: Acphzcv/uxYtGsd9Rv2nKtqHmoWfSw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 We are planning to hold first Hadoop India user group meet up on 28th Novem= ber 2009 in Noida. We would be talking about our experiences with Apache Hadoop/Hbase/Hive/PIG= /Nutch/etc. The agenda would be: - Introductions - Sharing experiences on Hadoop and related technologies - Establishing agenda for the next few meetings - Information exchange: tips, tricks, problems and open discussion - Possible speaker TBD (invitations open!!) {we do have something to share= on "Hadoop for newbie" & "Hadoop Advanced Tuning"} My company (Impetus) would be providing the meeting room and we should be a= ble to accommodate around 40-60 friendly people. Coffee, Tea, and some snac= ks will be provided. Please join the linked-in Hadoop India User Group (http://www.linkedin.com/= groups?home=3D&gid=3D2258445&trk=3Danet_ug_hm) OR Yahoo group (http://tech.= groups.yahoo.com/group/hadoopind/) and confirm your attendance. Regards, Sanjay Sharma Follow our updates on www.twitter.com/impetuscalling. * Impetus Technologies is exhibiting it capabilities in Mobile and Wireless= in the GSMA Mobile Asia Congress, Hong Kong from November 16-18, 2009. Vis= it http://www.impetus.com/mlabs/GSMA_events.html for details. NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietar= y, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely= for the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify t= he sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impe= tus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of thi= s communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of e= rrors, virus, interception or interference. From general-return-721-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 09:59:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22144 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 09:59:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 09:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13108 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 09:59:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13028 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 09:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13018 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 09:59:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nipen.mark@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:19 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2865293pzk.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TSkw1Wt8FzjqYjgPSj2vhmBqCx+ijHuHMJbz8WPQEwc=; b=AU8IUjQZrAg2BnnqrRytwjvBuXFmftx2Z/PsExGNfbpgXUZwNM2PIArOEqk5rTjD8p 1LkIsQ4dkzjGVvNuCAI3QmsXiDlQob5KCcex0hYcPUs0m4TPbQMhT+a0sF7T7hHiIncc 5DBt+TBxaPp2Yb78ZUTThCmM/DwNcCEhwEYFs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sqxHuA72wiQxkqptlxnQYG7LSVJf4rYIqcu1Ttj1zMpA2EFmjlOEi08gXJ81gPMtq7 g0ghC1afGOIt/vKShETRu2Y0Qc26dLLCKdRNNBT+Rp7cm9bTvcGNXTHFian63s+L4jMf qHRFzsPtGaL7vH8z8+5dFoR6itOc+DgKN83bw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.7.12 with SMTP id 12mr964613wfg.328.1257847139197; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:58:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:43:59 +0545 Message-ID: Subject: Showing hadoop status From: Mark N To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bc63e9e29c0478015b9a --00504502bc63e9e29c0478015b9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Currently I was trying to read the log files generated by hadoop so that I could show the status of map/reduce jobs in user interfaces (consider that UI is a separate application ) I was looking at JobTracker APIs and was trying use following APIs 1. jobtracker.getAllJobs() which returns array of jobstatus objects 2. Then for each jobStatus we can call mapProgress() , isJobCompleted() methods The problem is how do I link existing jobTracker ( which is already running ) with my code ? i am trying to built something like " hadoop UI ." should I use jobClient APIs ? Also is this a proper approach ? thanks in advance . N mark. --00504502bc63e9e29c0478015b9a-- From general-return-722-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 11:41:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54600 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 11:41:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 11:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 27862 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 11:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27789 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 11:41:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27779 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 11:41:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:41:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luis.junges@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.207] (HELO mail-ew0-f207.google.com) (209.85.219.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:41:08 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so4110986ewy.37 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:40:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=fU7p5J0GGvgnmFoK/Ca51bdDmZWTlYhY+NSbGlhe0iU=; b=rE3xyzSgq0wXhaxZ/SsIqe7TCFja91ep7o2gq6PyRc7Qo3m597KYni81flGYDLNIvC WY5O9XyY3WVu1Ol1LGYX+resePV+ZYduoq7X4zwPXI2UjB6zHc2Rz3ID6Q4lX2DdHUjQ XGYO31a9TLqG9S8xkRfOWfE3rlnXGkNkkNwVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UHWlb88xG3G6uv+UepqHUriHD/wLyZy8Ljm5n0C+rqIGVeSr/PFndP4nk9BJnasYhv DbaCgFo2V2lOmnQmbWb+NxlcyZy5Ib26my18dlx+B8nKhwmelhq6WgHVON/ZDafmi/lG Fs4snrQuKXLnCYcGiMlwvDP1fnda8bZNuHFlo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.23.203 with SMTP id s11mr4637311ebb.60.1257853247910; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:40:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:40:47 -0200 Message-ID: <752a037e0911100340u619ae830i807b718009e3efbc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: version 0.20.2 release? From: Luis Carlos Junges To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf75940572d0047802c851 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cdf75940572d0047802c851 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, i would like to know when would be the release of the version 0.20.2? i found the bug HBASE-1327 on it and i can start my hbase cluster because o= f it. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1327 is anyway to get a pre-release without this bug? --=20 "A realidade de cada lugar e de cada =E9poca =E9 uma alucina=E7=E3o coletiv= a." Bloom, Howardh --000e0cdf75940572d0047802c851-- From general-return-723-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 17:21:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10873 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 17:21:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 17:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28121 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 17:21:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27583 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 17:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27537 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 17:21:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:21:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:21:41 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nAAHKHr0082180; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:20:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=apNfqxijudhAXjZlWJ62XDsd6g7Ya28Ff4QDknkslbgAxyQONu9hNqB0LXkJ7HpI Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:20:17 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:20:15 -0800 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCpfO4pAFTtKFYA== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B2D55@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, We are one week away from the next Bay Area Hadoop User Group - Yahoo! Sun= nyvale Campus, next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at 6PM We have an exciting evening planed: *Katta, Solr, Lucene and Hadoop - Searching at scale, Jason Rutherglen and = Jason Venner *Walking through the New File system API, Sanjay Radia, Yahoo! *Keep your data in Jute but still use it in python, Paul Tarjan, Yahoo! Please RSVP here: http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11724002/ Please note that this is the last HUG for 2009, as we will not have a meeti= ng on December (due to the holidays). We will open 2010 with a HUG on Jan 20th. Looking forward to seeing you next week! Dekel From general-return-724-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 17:25:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12608 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 17:25:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 17:25:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 37957 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 17:25:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37907 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 17:25:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4594 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 11:09:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=tJWUiKQGodT9XZK7s0lLBN8D20gSn/Z/XawsEoQsvpejcBDih+McPplHJpK2wMVk From: Amogh Vasekar To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:38:44 +0530 Subject: Re: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Topic: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Index: Acphzcv/uxYtGsd9Rv2nKtqHmoWfSwAKF640 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C71F47943940amoghyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C71F47943940amoghyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is it Nov 28th or Dec 28th? Conflict in dates in mail and on site :) Amogh On 11/10/09 11:49 AM, "Sanjay Sharma" wrote: We are planning to hold first Hadoop India user group meet up on 28th Novem= ber 2009 in Noida. We would be talking about our experiences with Apache Hadoop/Hbase/Hive/PIG= /Nutch/etc. The agenda would be: - Introductions - Sharing experiences on Hadoop and related technologies - Establishing agenda for the next few meetings - Information exchange: tips, tricks, problems and open discussion - Possible speaker TBD (invitations open!!) {we do have something to share= on "Hadoop for newbie" & "Hadoop Advanced Tuning"} My company (Impetus) would be providing the meeting room and we should be a= ble to accommodate around 40-60 friendly people. Coffee, Tea, and some snac= ks will be provided. Please join the linked-in Hadoop India User Group (http://www.linkedin.com/= groups?home=3D&gid=3D2258445&trk=3Danet_ug_hm) OR Yahoo group (http://tech.= groups.yahoo.com/group/hadoopind/) and confirm your attendance. Regards, Sanjay Sharma Follow our updates on www.twitter.com/impetuscalling. * Impetus Technologies is exhibiting it capabilities in Mobile and Wireless= in the GSMA Mobile Asia Congress, Hong Kong from November 16-18, 2009. Vis= it http://www.impetus.com/mlabs/GSMA_events.html for details. NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietar= y, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely= for the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify t= he sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impe= tus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of thi= s communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of e= rrors, virus, interception or interference. --_000_C71F47943940amoghyahooinccom_-- From general-return-725-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 18:45:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75055 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 18:45:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 18:45:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 1913 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 18:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1851 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 18:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1841 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 18:45:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.78 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.78] (HELO mx3.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:45:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx3.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id nAAIiurt027594; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:44:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.46] (pool-72-81-183-12.bltmmd.east.verizon.net [72.81.183.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx3-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id nAAIitZB027577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:44:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Showing hadoop status Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Tejas Lagvankar In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:44:55 -0500 Cc: Mark N Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2951B209-6D73-42FD-B84F-CCFBFCF1A6AE@umbc.edu> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1258008296:933ceef8950cacee6c467bee0057a757 X-ClamAV: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Why would you want to read the status and write some other application when Hadoop provides cluster monitoring webapps at ports 50030, 50060 and 50070 ? On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Mark N wrote: > Currently I was trying to read the log files generated by hadoop so > that I > could show the status of map/reduce jobs in user interfaces > (consider that UI is a separate application ) > > I was looking at JobTracker APIs and was trying use following APIs > 1. jobtracker.getAllJobs() which returns array of jobstatus objects > > 2. Then for each jobStatus we can call > mapProgress() , isJobCompleted() methods > > The problem is how do I link existing jobTracker ( which is already > running > ) with my code ? i am trying to built something like " hadoop UI ." > > should I use jobClient APIs ? Also is this a proper approach ? > > thanks in advance . N mark. Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 From general-return-726-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 10 22:22:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68468 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 22:22:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 22:22:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 65632 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 22:22:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65554 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 22:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65544 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 22:22:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:22:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.188] (HELO mail-iw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.223.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:22:20 +0000 Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so464421iwn.5 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:21:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ssMADpe0XDbl2Si7SRDWw5aVDCkkyLCIm+rwWs1O+3c=; b=IuySMDjEZhSe0oRTLfwgzPSkTT1l4L9pMAhCI6pHclvoIqJ3/M3xCH9wYkWlh80NUM iD2BKwevpoaQPKwCuzcHzJVzLpXLHR1mFy/64rSheEYcaL249jTDhQXAvUg4tJezx/OI dOo5VYQBTW9bGBxkM6+VMCmv6cOA2rTfrY1cI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AQp8mBqsYwT+SpubgD5gLLEXoKX/+mgFmyZAcLjX/VmSp9/TAIimyfg5BkN5Vk+oww tolIWBBBj1KoM9XWByCNOb3DwK4IJG0UEd9bnCWbhgFhwLnNm9VqNe3lU6Um084ai2oS gHsTuzjESxNv1pIfJWIsy9Mnj8s2kUu9CMRJc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.201 with SMTP id e9mr1140982ibz.15.1257891719265; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:21:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B2D55@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B2D55@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:21:59 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501810217bf2804780bbdef X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504501810217bf2804780bbdef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Any consideration of making this event available for global members of hadoop community, say for instance, streaming it live. Or at least record the event and upload on youtube. Regards H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/11/11 Dekel Tankel > Hi all, > > We are one week away from the next Bay Area Hadoop User Group - Yahoo! > Sunnyvale Campus, next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at 6PM > > We have an exciting evening planed: > > *Katta, Solr, Lucene and Hadoop - Searching at scale, Jason Rutherglen and > Jason Venner > > *Walking through the New File system API, Sanjay Radia, Yahoo! > > *Keep your data in Jute but still use it in python, Paul Tarjan, Yahoo! > > > Please RSVP here: > http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11724002/ > > > Please note that this is the last HUG for 2009, as we will not have a > meeting on December (due to the holidays). > We will open 2010 with a HUG on Jan 20th. > > Looking forward to seeing you next week! > > Dekel > > --00504501810217bf2804780bbdef-- From general-return-727-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 00:50:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34479 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 00:50:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 00:50:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 97499 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 00:50:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97430 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 00:50:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97387 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 00:50:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:50:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of abhishek.vit@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:50:29 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so622258fxm.29 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zVe8DRXxMwBKiz+Oald9vg7fGnoMqpZLvLzeOffK2i8=; b=PWcOewIAE8ItsM7jqHYQ2fjBQ98YmKZZXPNsC5GkMHg5tYNK8v+TMoyGvx9PBz5OR/ B6Wul0Hj/lQO6nfYvnm9VMeC2tCFIbbXprCjsSoxzrsxTXGjI6XTys6G/KNlfj4j7l9x Kueb8wOEi/ef2eKk+J0Brc+lRvnnqIwaMz/kE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tGNjqA3XSGl8VXOOROXJ7zUWPNzru4WGaxC4HmR8xMBbJWXdk2P1kqGefN9pxPfeey bM9dy7ayVlWqbQMf5ri31TdNvO6X1qozZhkXLAA1rpRhgVkA10zzCrUahVkdAJ7DvQUp W5cm0LF2zT15PWzyRx4lGFI0VeaJzvkWRwvpQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.9.11 with SMTP id j11mr801880bkj.115.1257900607482; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B2D55@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:50:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! From: Abhishek Pratap To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758f422df2be904780dce31 --00151758f422df2be904780dce31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Harshit I second your idea. Since it is development under rapid progress, streaming live/recording will help reach out to lot of interested folks. I would be one of them. Cheers, -Abhi On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Harshit Kumar wrote: > Hi > > Any consideration of making this event available for global members of > hadoop community, say for instance, streaming it live. > > Or at least record the event and upload on youtube. > > Regards > H. Kumar > Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 > Phone(Office): +82-31- > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > 2009/11/11 Dekel Tankel > > > Hi all, > > > > We are one week away from the next Bay Area Hadoop User Group - Yahoo! > > Sunnyvale Campus, next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at 6PM > > > > We have an exciting evening planed: > > > > *Katta, Solr, Lucene and Hadoop - Searching at scale, Jason Rutherglen > and > > Jason Venner > > > > *Walking through the New File system API, Sanjay Radia, Yahoo! > > > > *Keep your data in Jute but still use it in python, Paul Tarjan, Yahoo! > > > > > > Please RSVP here: > > http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11724002/ > > > > > > Please note that this is the last HUG for 2009, as we will not have a > > meeting on December (due to the holidays). > > We will open 2010 with a HUG on Jan 20th. > > > > Looking forward to seeing you next week! > > > > Dekel > > > > > --00151758f422df2be904780dce31-- From general-return-728-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 01:20:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47927 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 01:20:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 01:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 26147 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 01:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26053 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 01:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26043 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 01:20:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:20:30 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so423331pzk.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:20:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=TZwPQ+3NRvRpLNFd9Jp13RjF2CxaDeJDTsOwtpjgkvs=; b=rhUNSmxWSEZoE6ifJZIaw8ri93uo5obnsOgRwhz71EOF1TC6eA6jDFBY4IEud7VZL2 r2KerhtTO8ZkdMrnsWS8j0ZOfhCjHGaXM7oLfKgADteDd4YWbjasXopYefSRyw3Mzmo7 5ERVsfqyLWgFIDrXpdDKLbpK+igiopcuGCDKE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=cNn+tCf+G5OSnNMmQ/MtmFoPoe9mH8+FCIteMk0PnKQx3BYCPcs1jbD/ycizvpy7Xs gGoBdoQ28PjE/cvjsqutC/DDPc4zZot71E0SWIV3rjlaCdKC2kYCQA0GXvgyqOz3PqlR /zZINdb/cvYwu3XFeRlB6Un+ZAhTF3/J82BlQ= Received: by 10.115.24.10 with SMTP id b10mr1667864waj.127.1257902409517; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.252.20.158? ([166.205.131.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm719482pxi.0.2009.11.10.17.20.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:20:08 -0800 (PST) References: <752a037e0911100340u619ae830i807b718009e3efbc@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <225FE2E8-7D96-4788-BBF5-197AF5816A14@gmail.com> From: Stack To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <752a037e0911100340u619ae830i807b718009e3efbc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7D11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11) Subject: Re: version 0.20.2 release? Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:20:13 -0800 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" An hbase release candidate for 0.20.2 was posted today. FYI hbase =20 questions will get a faster reponse asked on hbase mailing list. Yours Stack On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:40 AM, Luis Carlos Junges =20 wrote: > Hi, > > i would like to know when would be the release of the version 0.20.2? > > i found the bug HBASE-1327 on it and i can start my hbase cluster =20 > because of > it. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1327 > > is anyway to get a pre-release without this bug? > > --=20 > "A realidade de cada lugar e de cada =C3=A9poca =C3=A9 uma = alucina=C3=A7=C3=A3o =20 > coletiva." > > > Bloom, Howardh From general-return-729-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 04:03:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4181 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 04:03:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 04:03:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 71357 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 04:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71085 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 04:03:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71075 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 04:03:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:03:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nipen.mark@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:02:55 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so495289pwi.29 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:02:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IpsQCX4MXxcGDCivWm94grp8e86HLeTo4S0qU85HNqM=; b=MMNvfR5juIhWInKlhpHHNZxJ5akBzpOMywBqgGCJDiAqnw4IuCaxR+q64wXoC31Rl0 G8GBa/HjGP+QxbHC2Wcbs8xw1Oh1lAWzkhK6cywWcEPJUefHEv9nQGndiBwD5TEbWbNd SUyXovAOMkgUOjKa4MNOujs5NQ2lzewpHJ/mk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=EAgy4tE5nhaqyKzXl9HnLvB7JJ64CwI5L0AaL+LMy5ySEzmgDx828LJ4ap0ldQkFIg xBBOas5nhMCzxXFtjMmSEATLhTxM18LXWONWVnFtFpG86aXcZnW/LKNdGxmgVRUCX0i4 eS/tP15Wy7DcOHzMPrMgyGyIiZD1NuEaWJSLw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.195.4 with SMTP id s4mr107950wff.264.1257912154340; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:02:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2951B209-6D73-42FD-B84F-CCFBFCF1A6AE@umbc.edu> References: <2951B209-6D73-42FD-B84F-CCFBFCF1A6AE@umbc.edu> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:47:34 +0545 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Showing hadoop status From: Mark N To: Tejas Lagvankar Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1449c1e3d1d0478107f2b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1449c1e3d1d0478107f2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Am trying to invoke hadoop process from seperate user interface where user can see some kind of status. has anyone tried on this approach? thanks On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > Why would you want to read the status and write some other application when > Hadoop provides cluster monitoring webapps at ports 50030, 50060 and 50070 ? > > > On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Mark N wrote: > > Currently I was trying to read the log files generated by hadoop so that >> I >> could show the status of map/reduce jobs in user interfaces >> (consider that UI is a separate application ) >> >> I was looking at JobTracker APIs and was trying use following APIs >> 1. jobtracker.getAllJobs() which returns array of jobstatus objects >> >> 2. Then for each jobStatus we can call >> mapProgress() , isJobCompleted() methods >> >> The problem is how do I link existing jobTracker ( which is already >> running >> ) with my code ? i am trying to built something like " hadoop UI ." >> >> should I use jobClient APIs ? Also is this a proper approach ? >> >> thanks in advance . N mark. >> > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > --000e0cd1449c1e3d1d0478107f2b-- From general-return-730-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 10:43:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78359 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 10:43:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 10:43:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13869 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 10:43:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13790 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 10:43:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13778 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 10:43:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:43:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:43:20 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:42:57 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'users@lists.opennebula.org'" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:42:56 +0100 Subject: Hadoop on Opennebula Thread-Topic: Hadoop on Opennebula Thread-Index: Acpiu7hZJPp+aKVJSbKkqn9GFSreZQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA62C4.1A657810" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA62C4.1A657810 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_01CA62C4.1A657810" ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CA62C4.1A657810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi list, We have a cluster with 44 cores on which we are evaluating OpenNebula. All nodes run Ubuntu server 64bit. I'm trying to get Hadoop 0.20.1 to work, so I'm following the cluster setup steps on hadoop.apache.org. As a start I created three VM's running Ubuntu 9.10 32bit desktop edition. After installing Sun's 1.6 JRE I put Hadoop into my homedir. I configured the three installations of Hadoop as follows: == conf/hadoop-env.sh == Set JAVA_HOME to the appropriate directory == conf/core-site.xml == Set fs.default.name to the ip address of the designated namenode, on port 9000: fs.default.name hdfs://XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9000/ == conf/hdfs-site.xml == Set dfs.name.dir to a directory in my homedir: dfs.name.dir /home/cloud/var/log/hadoop/ == conf/mapred-site.xml == Set mapred.job.tracker to the ip address of the designated jobtracker, on port 9001: mapred.job.tracker XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9001 Apart from Hadoop configuration I manually set the hostname for the namenode, jobtracker and slave (datanode & tasktracker) to respectively hadoop-namenode, hadoop-jobtracker and hadoop-slave01. I'm able to start the hdfs with bin/start-dfs.sh, and mapreduce with bin/start-mapred.sh without any exceptions. However, when I now try to copy files onto hdfs, I'm getting the following exception: $ bin/hadoop fs -put conf input 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: DataStreamer Exception: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: File /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNam esystem.java:1267) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:422) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:739) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39 ) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl .java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocati onHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHand ler.java:59) at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.locateFollowingBlock(DFSCli ent.java:2904) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DFSCl ient.java:2786) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2000(DFSClient.java: 2076) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient. java:2262) 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Error Recovery for block null bad datanode[0] nodes == null 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Could not get block locations. Source file "/user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml" - Aborting... put: java.io.IOException: File /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 Can anybody shed light on this? I'm guessing it's a configuration issue, so that's the direction I'm looking at. Another question I have is more generally about getting Hadoop to work on a cloud. The issue I foresee is about the ip addresses of the masters and slaves. How do I dynamically configure the hadoop instances during start-up of the images to end up with a namenode, a jobtracker and a number of slaves? I'll need the ip addresses of all machines and all machines need a unique hostname. Does anybody have any experience with this? Thanks in advance! Evert Lammerts Adviseur SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization eScience Support Group Phone: +31 20 888 4101 Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CA62C4.1A657810 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi list,

 

We have a cluster with 44 cores on which we are = evaluating OpenNebula. All nodes run Ubuntu server 64bit. I’m trying to get Hadoop 0.20.1 = to work, so I’m following the cluster setup steps on = hadoop.apache.org.

 

As a start I created three VM’s running = Ubuntu 9.10 32bit desktop edition. After installing Sun’s 1.6 JRE I put Hadoop into = my homedir. I configured the three installations of Hadoop as = follows:

 

=3D=3D conf/hadoop-env.sh =3D=3D

Set JAVA_HOME to the appropriate = directory

 

=3D=3D conf/core-site.xml =3D=3D

Set fs.default.name to the ip address of the = designated namenode, on port 9000:

<property>

   = <name>fs.default.name</name>

   = <value>hdfs://XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9000/</value>

 </property>

 

=3D=3D conf/hdfs-site.xml =3D=3D

Set dfs.name.dir to a directory in my = homedir:

<property>

  = <name>dfs.name.dir</name>

  = <value>/home/cloud/var/log/hadoop/</value>

</property>

 

=3D=3D conf/mapred-site.xml =3D=3D

Set mapred.job.tracker to the ip address of the = designated jobtracker, on port 9001:

<property>

  = <name>mapred.job.tracker</name>

  = <value>XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9001</value>

<property>

 

Apart from Hadoop configuration I manually set the = hostname for the namenode, jobtracker and slave (datanode & tasktracker) to = respectively hadoop-namenode, hadoop-jobtracker and hadoop-slave01.

 

I’m able to start the hdfs with = bin/start-dfs.sh, and mapreduce with bin/start-mapred.sh without any exceptions. However, when = I now try to copy files onto hdfs, I’m getting the following = exception:

 

$ bin/hadoop fs -put conf input

09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: DataStreamer Exception: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: = File /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml could only be replicated to 0 = nodes, instead of 1

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FS= Namesystem.java:1267)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:42= 2)

         &= nbsp;      at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown = Source)

         &= nbsp;      at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25)

         &= nbsp;      at = java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955)

         &= nbsp;      at = java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

         &= nbsp;      at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953)

 

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:739)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220)

         &= nbsp;      at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown = Source)

         &= nbsp;      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native = Method)

         &= nbsp;      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java= :39)

         &= nbsp;      at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25)

         &= nbsp;      at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvoc= ationHandler.java:82)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationH= andler.java:59)

         &= nbsp;      at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown = Source)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.locateFollowingBlock(DFS= Client.java:2904)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DF= SClient.java:2786)

         &= nbsp;      at = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2000(DFSClient.ja= va:2076)

         &= nbsp;      at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClie= nt.java:2262)

 

09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Error = Recovery for block null bad datanode[0] nodes =3D=3D null

09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Could not = get block locations. Source file = "/user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml" - Aborting...

put: java.io.IOException: File /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml could only be replicated to 0 = nodes, instead of 1

 

Can anybody shed light on this? I’m guessing = it’s a configuration issue, so that’s the direction I’m looking = at.

 

Another question I have is more generally about = getting Hadoop to work on a cloud. The issue I foresee is about the ip addresses of the masters and slaves. How do I dynamically configure the hadoop instances = during start-up of the images to end up with a namenode, a jobtracker and a = number of slaves? I’ll need the ip addresses of all machines and all = machines need a unique hostname… Does anybody have any experience with = this?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Evert Lammerts

Adviseur

SARA Computing & Network Services

High Performance Computing & Visualization

eScience Support Group

 

Phone: +31 20 888 4101

Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl

 

------=_NextPart_001_0001_01CA62C4.1A657810-- ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA62C4.1A657810 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII9TCCAn0w ggHmoAMCAQICEFiofjswHrxbxE7M/zOuXB8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA5MDEyOTA5NTgyOFoXDTEwMDEyOTA5NTgy OFowYzERMA8GA1UEBBMITGFtbWVydHMxDjAMBgNVBCoTBUV2ZXJ0MRcwFQYDVQQDEw5FdmVydCBM YW1tZXJ0czElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWZXZlcnQubGFtbWVydHNAc2FyYS5ubDCBnzANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA6W7oHcE2VEPAb895157nhumm7Wnd8R1UVcsoT7BQpUSvWLPuyo70 KSI3JHAqprbWIQTDtHJ5eR+f4CktFclrf0vygCGtBIPBtsW9UO+NRxEYxtkBLEu2p/DXlnCQ04EB auypiyGBL7an5HGPMU8B6F/UABjJbJ698G4ufdiuWOMCAwEAAaMzMDEwIQYDVR0RBBowGIEWZXZl cnQubGFtbWVydHNAc2FyYS5ubDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAHzlG2fG eJqSMAjBvpTN1y8tlbvl0vZ5Cxu0jYYc92aFVdhkina+JjD53dw204bdl+U9zbGHSLqlVoh92p+E 53yBRlEh9uJ/K6HcdBe/s2KEjZHfCGi756sP5M9z6txyxYOBtSv7EHKOL+HJMCCHbrVAICjOpxJY QWwb5waKfaeUMIIDLTCCApagAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx FTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3 dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEk MCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJz b25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTk2MDEwMTAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMTIzMTIzNTk1OVow gdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93 bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2Vy dmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEF AAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA1GnX1LCUZFtx6UfYDFG26nKRsIRefS0Nj3sS34UldSh0OkIsYyeflXtL734Z hx2G6qPduc6WZBrCFG5ErHzmj+hND3EfQDimAKOHePb5lIZererAXnbr2RSjXW56fAylS1V/Bhkp f56aJtVquzgkCGqYx7Hao5iR/Xnb5VrEHLkCAwEAAaMTMBEwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQDH7JJ+Tvj1lqVnYiqk8E0RYNBvjWBYYawmu1I1XAjPMPuoSpaKH2JCI4wX D/S6ZJwXrEcp352YXtJsYHFcoqzceePnbgBHH7UNKOgCneSa/RP0ptl8sfjcXyMmCZGAc9AUG95D qYMl8uacLxXK/qarigd1iwzdUYRr5PjRzneigTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEF BQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUg VG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24g U2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTEr MCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAw MDBaFw0xMzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3Vs dGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWlu ZyBDQTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me 7L3N9VvyGna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r 1fOCdz0Dviv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCB kTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3Rl LmNvbS9UaGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAg pB4wHDEaMBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPq Cy7MDaNmrGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUa C4J0niVQlGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx 0x1G/11fZU8xggL4MIIC9AIBATB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNz dWluZyBDQQIQWKh+OzAevFvETsz/M65cHzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIB2DAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJ KoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wOTExMTExMDQyNTJaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQU iu7Jm2MP3BZM1knitY3MCdyEgzBnBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xWjBYMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAHBgUrDgMCGjAK BggqhkiG9w0CBTCBhQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMXgwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEFiofjswHrxbxE7M/zOuXB8wgYcGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMXigdjBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEFiofjswHrxbxE7M/zOuXB8w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYBkhKlhriqcJTu/Jf0Hgka/9yyvUe5ZrB2vbYbzeyQGynB3RDNPpR6N HG04HuW36N4ETHq/G1ibOdoNRNmUTX5SFIHJ+Rd/gAdUPAGe7VLPo3vR029LZQ5UZ4rv8JdsIzCg 7a541jR5i+r+RX4MhydnFd47loFpoWtaTyXpdveNdQAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CA62C4.1A657810-- From general-return-731-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 10:51:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81958 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 10:51:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 10:51:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 23840 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 10:51:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23755 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 10:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23745 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 10:51:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5C3B7F54 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:35 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Xnmq8NMyRVkl for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9773B7F3C for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:27 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1258541417.30303@KuBFpZeCXHwOzsDVTOy2ZQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nABAoGSM021146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:17 GMT Message-ID: <4AFA96E8.2030303@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:50:16 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Showing hadoop status References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nABAoGSM021146 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mark N wrote: > Currently I was trying to read the log files generated by hadoop so that I > could show the status of map/reduce jobs in user interfaces > (consider that UI is a separate application ) > > I was looking at JobTracker APIs and was trying use following APIs > 1. jobtracker.getAllJobs() which returns array of jobstatus objects > > 2. Then for each jobStatus we can call > mapProgress() , isJobCompleted() methods > > The problem is how do I link existing jobTracker ( which is already running > ) with my code ? i am trying to built something like " hadoop UI ." > > should I use jobClient APIs ? Also is this a proper approach ? > > thanks in advance . N mark. > jobclient API is full featured, but brittle against versions. If you look at Hadoop Studio, they apparently have added a plug-in layer so they can work with different versions of hadoop more gracefully -you may want to use their code: http://www.hadoopstudio.org/ Some of the JSP pages have status, there's a new one that pushes some XML content out, but nobody has yet sat down and written a stable, secure long-haul interface to the job tracker. I've talked about it, got some ideas, but not started coding a proper RESTful front end http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/long-haul-hadoop -steve From general-return-732-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 11 12:00:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 809 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 12:00:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 12:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 94775 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 12:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94687 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 12:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94677 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 12:00:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:00:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:00:08 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421276BB9F for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:59:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4AFAA731.1000504@crs4.it> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:59:45 +0100 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091007) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: SGE patch for HOD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi everybody, At CRS4, Distributed Computing Group (http://dc.crs4.it), we developed and tested a simple patch that adds Grid Engine support to HOD. Since porting HOD to SGE is listed in the Project Suggestions page at: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSuggestions we decided to share the patch with the community. The patch is available as an attachment to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6369 After patching, HOD passes all unit tests at our site, and we tested the SGE driver on a production cluster consisting of about 400 nodes. The patch should preserve Torque functionality, although we were not able to test this on production. *NOTE*: the patch is for the official hadoop-0.20.1 HOD release. It should be easy, however, to generate patches for other versions. To patch, simply download the patch from the above JIRA link and run: cd ${HADOOP_HOME}/src/contrib && patch -p0 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53004 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 17:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3794 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 17:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3705 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 17:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3695 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 17:33:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:33:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:33:19 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nABHWM6E096054 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:32:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=RpUusPonQZkEdB/i07TN0V2Q3aHvFoz05k/8kg4fK/v/IpYK8x60Cd66q5dYQ8bq Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:32:26 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:32:25 -0800 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcpiaSnGH0jGsppyTpC/BN2d+8rrxAAi7NPQ Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B3072@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD60B2D55@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I like this. Great idea. Let me check our options... Dekel -----Original Message----- From: Abhishek Pratap [mailto:abhishek.vit@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:50 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at Ya= hoo! Hi Harshit I second your idea. Since it is development under rapid progress, streaming live/recording will help reach out to lot of interested folks. I would be one of them. Cheers, -Abhi On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Harshit Kumar wrot= e: > Hi > > Any consideration of making this event available for global members of > hadoop community, say for instance, streaming it live. > > Or at least record the event and upload on youtube. > > Regards > H. Kumar > Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 > Phone(Office): +82-31- > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > 2009/11/11 Dekel Tankel > > > Hi all, > > > > We are one week away from the next Bay Area Hadoop User Group - Yahoo! > > Sunnyvale Campus, next Wednesday (Nov 18th) at 6PM > > > > We have an exciting evening planed: > > > > *Katta, Solr, Lucene and Hadoop - Searching at scale, Jason Rutherglen > and > > Jason Venner > > > > *Walking through the New File system API, Sanjay Radia, Yahoo! > > > > *Keep your data in Jute but still use it in python, Paul Tarjan, Yahoo! > > > > > > Please RSVP here: > > http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11724002/ > > > > > > Please note that this is the last HUG for 2009, as we will not have a > > meeting on December (due to the holidays). > > We will open 2010 with a HUG on Jan 20th. > > > > Looking forward to seeing you next week! > > > > Dekel > > > > > From general-return-734-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 12 12:17:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74441 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2009 12:17:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 12:17:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 50922 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 12:17:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50827 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 12:17:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50817 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2009 12:17:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:17:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nipen.mark@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:17:28 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1428207pzk.5 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:17:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=9if/nwBXxlS8J9f/4rB1Z4Zlsbql4yjhGYB3LMb6Fr4=; b=cxLbMPpQVi/lbL98D13/malqU/N2GA62pGdpa6b1Uegpqy0+loDuQcMVuLZ1LbhyDW LtSMf8WaEFSaxYAaKKCEDYyHp+U/aifuC8f1Wm8E9sn/URcScmznLZyg6Xin3VmdHquS 5RqTIWBwRbpIWoJ+XWST2ingHdZqmnQfpI3x8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k28FcMI8/T8AGbGEV54wlLYCabQ/J7LDDiaZxfnnan2mpsmi6B+sl+sOj4T3yIwc5z QIKA6TwEfoubJ9jiOWuHKHBfRJD4mdMlFTHd1H8uJ13ua3ZeNu4kgXoYeqmqsmkWTwx1 ctm+SdxLDa50PsB4QMwRoyrWvr7g8Wr2NvdxM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.151.9 with SMTP id y9mr306398wfd.337.1258028226843; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:17:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:02:06 +0545 Message-ID: Subject: configuring hadoop cluster From: Mark N To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd311ec9414fb04782b85fa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd311ec9414fb04782b85fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 is it possible to use local file system ( or NFS) with a distributed cluster configuration ? If its possible what are the configuration that I need to change Currently we are trying to process documents from local file system instead of HDFS. thanks Mark N --000e0cd311ec9414fb04782b85fa-- From general-return-735-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 12 22:23:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11978 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2009 22:23:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2009 22:23:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 17744 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 22:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17660 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2009 22:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17646 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2009 22:23:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:23:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:23:07 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.247] (wifi-e-135-247.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.247]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nACMMhXt002333; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:22:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AFC8AB2.2010400@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:22:42 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One additional benefit of using HTTP is that people are always working to improve performance, and not only optimizing servers -- Google's SPDY: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spdy_google_wants_to_speed_up_the_web.php Multiplexed requests, compressed headers, etc... Patrick Doug Cutting wrote: > I'm considering an HTTP-based transport for Avro as the preferred, > high-performance option. > > HTTP has lots of advantages. In particular, it already has > - lots of authentication, authorization and encryption support; > - highly optimized servers; > - monitoring, logging, etc. > > Tomcat and other servlet containers support async NIO, where a thread is > not required per connection. A servlet can process bulk data with a > single copy to and from the socket (bypassing stream buffers). Calls > can be multiplexed over a single HTTP connection using Comet events. > > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/aio.html > > Zero copy is not an option for servlets that generate arbitrary data, > but one can specify a file/start/length tuple and Tomcat will use > sendfile to write the response. That means that while HDFS datanode > file reads could not be done via RPC, they could be done via HTTP with > zero-copy. If authentication and authorization are already done in the > HTTP server, this may not be a big loss. The HDFS client might make two > HTTP requests, one to read a files data, and another to read its > checksums. The server would then stream the entire block to the client > using sendfile, using TCP flow control as today. > > Thoughts? > > Doug From general-return-736-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 13 08:04:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29812 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2009 08:04:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2009 08:04:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87729 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2009 08:04:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87648 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2009 08:04:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48636 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 18:02:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tinova79@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=5qJtPPDCo8oWa1CbIbSw1/9kBs+paZ+jJCQSpe09DvY=; b=J6dvYrPx7D0nzcdJb1GK4htETk00DDw10lazayjnhO6yFCO+NFbwjMIm26lF7joWoR FKS2Ts66X9bYutpwpvITRJRhCgZg5EEZtw2gCGo8c5i92t9ZqmlkwSUr5xXCYDXPG+mL ITPKqIF+xWKgEUzx1B7mlJCBzS8Dc2uhZTvRM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=KH4ZpYHek+WKYsPvjWtx18QDTPlMiQMekv++54By8HZqSkzJfPwzGszL3rfk50kw3Q ZeUfk+mhfv7wbK4wpBMeIKWjiyDcWSbdebg2MULwQkypn5QxKcqCn4QDvEyJE6GjUOLX c1xg4qmNAHQYcSNRRpIYKRh9lJVgEKHTbZy3I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tinova79@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: From: Tino Vazquez Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:02:13 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bdbed9b66d03e4c0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [one-users] Hadoop on Opennebula To: Evert Lammerts Cc: "users@lists.opennebula.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747868e2d9bcf04781c3bfb --00151747868e2d9bcf04781c3bfb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Evert, We are not Hadoop experts, so we will appreciate if you could redirect the Hadoop file copying problem to the relevant mailing list. About the execution of Hadoop in a cloud, OpenNebula can provide your Hadoo= p VMs with contextualization information. This means that the VM can have its hostname and IP set, and this can be accessed by other VMs. So, for instance, your master node can be given an IP address (or you can have this IP to be fixed) and then the worker nodes will be able to access this information (IP and/or hostname of the master), inside an attached ISO. Mor= e information on contextualization in OpenNebula can be found in [1]. I think you have a very interesting use case, we are happy to provide support for any contextualization related issue. Hope it helps, -Tino [1] http://opennebula.org/doku.php?id=3Ddocumentation:rel1.4:cong -- Constantino V=E1zquez, Grid Technology Engineer/Researcher: http://www.dsa-research.org/tinova DSA Research Group: http://dsa-research.org Globus GridWay Metascheduler: http://www.GridWay.org OpenNebula Virtual Infrastructure Engine: http://www.OpenNebula.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Evert Lammerts wr= ote: > Hi list, > > > > We have a cluster with 44 cores on which we are evaluating OpenNebula. Al= l > nodes run Ubuntu server 64bit. I=92m trying to get Hadoop 0.20.1 to work,= so > I=92m following the cluster setup steps on hadoop.apache.org. > > > > As a start I created three VM=92s running Ubuntu 9.10 32bit desktop editi= on. > After installing Sun=92s 1.6 JRE I put Hadoop into my homedir. I configur= ed > the three installations of Hadoop as follows: > > > > =3D=3D conf/hadoop-env.sh =3D=3D > > Set JAVA_HOME to the appropriate directory > > > > =3D=3D conf/core-site.xml =3D=3D > > Set fs.default.name to the ip address of the designated namenode, on port > 9000: > > > > fs.default.name > > hdfs://XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9000/ > > > > > > =3D=3D conf/hdfs-site.xml =3D=3D > > Set dfs.name.dir to a directory in my homedir: > > > > dfs.name.dir > > /home/cloud/var/log/hadoop/ > > > > > > =3D=3D conf/mapred-site.xml =3D=3D > > Set mapred.job.tracker to the ip address of the designated jobtracker, on > port 9001: > > > > mapred.job.tracker > > XXX.XXX.X.XXX:9001 > > > > > > Apart from Hadoop configuration I manually set the hostname for the > namenode, jobtracker and slave (datanode & tasktracker) to respectively > hadoop-namenode, hadoop-jobtracker and hadoop-slave01. > > > > I=92m able to start the hdfs with bin/start-dfs.sh, and mapreduce with > bin/start-mapred.sh without any exceptions. However, when I now try to co= py > files onto hdfs, I=92m getting the following exception: > > > > $ bin/hadoop fs -put conf input > > 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: DataStreamer Exception: > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: File > /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml could only be replicated to 0 > nodes, instead of 1 > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FS= Namesystem.java:1267) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:42= 2) > > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor20.invoke(Unknown > Source) > > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native > Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:739) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) > > at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > Method) > > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java= :39) > > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvoc= ationHandler.java:82) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationH= andler.java:59) > > at $Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.locateFollowingBlock(DFS= Client.java:2904) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DF= SClient.java:2786) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2000(DFSClient.ja= va:2076) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClie= nt.java:2262) > > > > 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Error Recovery for block null bad > datanode[0] nodes =3D=3D null > > 09/11/11 05:24:47 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: Could not get block locations. > Source file "/user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml" - Aborting... > > put: java.io.IOException: File /user/cloud/input/capacity-scheduler.xml > could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 > > > > Can anybody shed light on this? I=92m guessing it=92s a configuration iss= ue, so > that=92s the direction I=92m looking at. > > > > Another question I have is more generally about getting Hadoop to work on= a > cloud. The issue I foresee is about the ip addresses of the masters and > slaves. How do I dynamically configure the hadoop instances during start-= up > of the images to end up with a namenode, a jobtracker and a number of > slaves? I=92ll need the ip addresses of all machines and all machines nee= d a > unique hostname=85 Does anybody have any experience with this? > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Evert Lammerts > > Adviseur > > SARA Computing & Network Services > > High Performance Computing & Visualization > > eScience Support Group > > > > Phone: +31 20 888 4101 > > Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > --00151747868e2d9bcf04781c3bfb-- From general-return-737-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 07:10:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79927 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 07:10:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 07:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 93449 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 07:10:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93367 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 07:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93357 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 07:10:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:10:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of apurba@pramati.com designates 196.12.47.8 as permitted sender) Received: from [196.12.47.8] (HELO mail.pramati.com) (196.12.47.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:10:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.pramati.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47FC7781EA for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:06:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pramati.com Received: from mail.pramati.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.pramati.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGJXqUOueGvx for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:36:24 +0530 (IST) Received: from [192.168.2.197] (unknown [192.168.2.197]) by mail.pramati.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080717781CC for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:36:24 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4B00FAD7.40202@pramati.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:40:15 +0530 From: Apurba Kumar Nath User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: smart serialization for WordCount example Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was wondering if we could introduce a template to let the end user add strings and ints to the context and the template could convert them to the appropriate serializable type. I am suggesting that the current context.write(word, one); where word is Text and one is IntWritable, use something like context.write(itr.nextToken, 1); now either the context is smart enough to convert itr.nextToken which is string into Text and 1 which is int into IntWritable or the map method is worked on by some method in the template to do the same. The advantage is that for beginners they can still talk in ints and strings and other such classes and may not have to get exposed to IntWritable and other such more easily serializable wrappers. I can commit the patch if the idea seems ok. -- Thanks Apurba Share interests with friends with just a click. Try it! http://tellafriend.socialtwist.com From general-return-738-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 17:13:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95880 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 17:13:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 17:13:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 80723 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 17:13:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80647 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80637 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.139] (HELO web32208.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:13:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 2999 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Nov 2009 17:13:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258391586; bh=ZIST+Bdsj6WG75dJ1qK39q6Qk5sXLo5V64iBUgt4Cks=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qeiH0Tc8WeurtUZ4F6lfBRgqy/GCsfZzBMpggQNfR8cnWCzIbLVWHJBbl0BCIAf0LtPXXtXYse/8rk1/cejfw4iC6WRWP4/2iT3mErV4dXZPuLH8xyhl2XEF/yXbh25WJqm6A1CfaAQ9O3qzkjx+sIklENQo+NOOTDxZ4ussIEQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Yj/+44NCfok0DWRxwMMMQ+PaZaEmIJSwEA1UWwDuLz6ltZU82HBygcmMQL7IqZfn11aaJeko654CBsIWM+6F7YQ5DMA0E/vwiMNNYrJUiT2gj/8nIMkd1i8UBpguRNAVzFRHVORUyr9SVQoCyq0EJoBkfpdIYFYw4/xkdkKw43Y=; Message-ID: <654001.2236.qm@web32208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: l9c6254VM1lqnzgRLy95l9f15.zpzGji4lzbHH5AKSltuDPjKKBVD9VKksbM_c1jNmO.qFOGTa6v3ct16xMpdCPmYNKcwxqzhURROlJgJczp5EJcETSJZqdlGVsgDlF3giDWopOuwHgR1KFwGzGscv4Lg9MRJnmzBDxNfLOI3ENE_EZ2y8DIzpCXKLv0.74XQfvqM4EEndolvheiz.GRUxiZ.6wC3WGa9WjCMmXs6h.1FG.xf.X2Y3I.d0Mnx5zuMODd9kYsDG9wORddIAGhF4p.M4BFboroixXV4MyRm4hUxEcnpWvKrG5l5eeniAcxcgOEZKoUwwqbtb4Z_p2utA-- Received: from [69.143.207.68] by web32208.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:13:06 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:13:06 -0800 (PST) From: Rajiv Maheshwari Subject: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: Hadoop Mail-list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-219672166-1258391586=:2236" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-219672166-1258391586=:2236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone, I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on k= ey1, then on key2. Example: key1=A0 key2=A0=A0 values ------------------------- 0001=A0 0001=A0 values... 0001=A0 0002=A0 values... 0002=A0 0001=A0 values... 0002=A0 0005=A0 values... I am thinking of the following solution approach: Define KEY =3D key1, key2=A0=A0 /* concatenate keys */. Override default Ha= shPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { public void configure(JobConf job) {} public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { =A0=A0=A0 return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % numPartit= ions; =A0=A0=A0 } } Would this work? Does anyone have any better ideas? Thanks much, Rajiv =0A=0A=0A --0-219672166-1258391586=:2236-- From general-return-739-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 19:08:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44293 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 19:08:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 19:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5921 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:08:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5830 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5820 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 19:08:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:08:50 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so3758795yxe.5 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:08:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SpfdfREIA5MUrEcEJ2koeAtFbzB4A5QPU5BJfcSVC9A=; b=Pjlbj48b0prM+CGq55XiuS+smbMQqW5yMHJcuOBV7AS89UyhilOTMjmt8R8/mOv3Ab Qayar22hV9pAuNr11bJPu9rZV05HAkcd8vMGURTFWMZ3fR4C3aUIhq/dLUtZhyd7Pjnu vdEPeIXvsyeB+I7FGwMC8OVylbVffdE38zRIU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=K0nu5Kki3wjA9xh8jmvg6+JjiPx7jkIt5gsdOIb1qL9aD4jMv4oiALE4zrnfh2d1QF 0ht2QaKc967FC7MQ12P9+6HqXNyXcwLWA13lhtH2Pr862IWIwydVKQbb1Q+jMYr3pnQT Czm/01pTzpnizxDYXyfICxtvIsqk5kEkWCwbc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.43.17 with SMTP id q17mr14222048ybq.197.1258398509050; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:08:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <654001.2236.qm@web32208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <654001.2236.qm@web32208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: goutham patnaik Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:08:09 -0800 Message-ID: <1b3669280911161108p4fbe9d20i12dd564a121aecac@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd330581e2c5e047881bcfa --000e0cd330581e2c5e047881bcfa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Rajiv, You could write your own class which implements the WritableComparable interface and use this as your key class - all u need to do is implement the write, readFields and compareTo methods - the map will then sort your keys using this method : public class TupleKey implements WritableComparable { IntWritable k1; IntWritable k2; ....... } On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on > key1, then on key2. > > Example: > key1 key2 values > ------------------------- > 0001 0001 values... > 0001 0002 values... > 0002 0001 values... > 0002 0005 values... > > > I am thinking of the following solution approach: > > Define KEY = key1, key2 /* concatenate keys */. Override default > HashPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. > > > public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { > > public void configure(JobConf job) {} > > public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { > > return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % numPartitions; > } > } > > Would this work? > > Does anyone have any better ideas? > > Thanks much, > Rajiv > > > > > --000e0cd330581e2c5e047881bcfa-- From general-return-740-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 19:17:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46885 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 19:17:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 19:17:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 27229 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:17:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27172 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27162 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 19:17:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:17:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.134] (HELO web32203.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:17:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 52228 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Nov 2009 19:16:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258399001; bh=eYAnehySQF66DBDcMe75Rsq9oiTKhvv3T/3teerWE18=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Tm2Pv2Iw+CfYQEnYLne5dq6ju4gy1xIrWsT2jYBoDh0sZvJoVOaua1rXQp05J8ehCSrbE999p1jDWLlkxkIz1tz6pl9YrKiZlAW3DxG1uY+2vsHNs5hHAJFbQ34a7MosMeAsQaT4i3NTTCP8ZHkPbOy9p1SNMmdMjA7b9oRIpVI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yp0TFZ5aV7GWdjug91zEwdT5iGAiwlH7S9pJ3ZzPOwBQFVZJM6LoorUZWz0E6j/i9sYTMyKdlFyOx3qP3+oR47k7s0L2Em74B3TjRMHeRRu/Gw8fiNHAT2DHQ2kcGU3jKDD4Pum4lTFuhCNYO7Y6J3fUOSRd8DvyAs6lxV+fGL0=; Message-ID: <895334.52215.qm@web32203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: DyoHoQsVM1msu2fXeWZeEhEI6hERW1LLNjgKeOOMH5.sl5bO7q8x116KaZ_UF3IYMW7UCtmIoBxeU9_e6jPb2YfegMliHVU4Q2DtrhVIfScEW8RU5udOL9Wvb3StNMSXPzTA4yTyS1R5gXuUmtvXoOYFn3UVD_OabBZ0EXlVi5gc2mtw.VC7Q.PncKjqiijeE5qWur.x1VE5oLA8mekzkIr0Vg2FKXi0HXZZe.oosTkk4sNXp1GnIe0ZRUlucY4XyVgunR8Y7eHiUQOqRy7IZ0mlHs86D9HlB7N6em93jfLnPvutv_ye3JjOduOHM9sRN3jC1NMPRb8V7mCD.Q.n4PVa630- Received: from [69.143.207.68] by web32203.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:16:41 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Rajiv Maheshwari Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1b3669280911161108p4fbe9d20i12dd564a121aecac@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1676722562-1258399001=:52215" --0-1676722562-1258399001=:52215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, appreciate it. Rajiv --- On Mon, 11/16/09, goutham patnaik wrote: From: goutham patnaik Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 11:08 AM Rajiv, You could write your own class which implements the WritableComparable interface and use this as your key class -=A0 all u need to do is implement the write, readFields and compareTo methods - the map will then sort your keys using this method : public class TupleKey implements WritableComparable { IntWritable k1; IntWritable k2; ....... } On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote= : > Hi everyone, > > I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on > key1, then on key2. > > Example: > key1=A0 key2=A0=A0=A0values > ------------------------- > 0001=A0 0001=A0 values... > 0001=A0 0002=A0 values... > 0002=A0 0001=A0 values... > 0002=A0 0005=A0 values... > > > I am thinking of the following solution approach: > > Define KEY =3D key1, key2=A0=A0=A0/* concatenate keys */. Override defaul= t > HashPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. > > > public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { > > public void configure(JobConf job) {} > > public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { > >=A0 =A0=A0=A0return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % numPa= rtitions; >=A0 =A0=A0=A0} > } > > Would this work? > > Does anyone have any better ideas? > > Thanks much, > Rajiv > > > > > =0A=0A=0A --0-1676722562-1258399001=:52215-- From general-return-741-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 19:24:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48878 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 19:24:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 19:24:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 47000 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:24:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46933 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46923 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 19:24:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.215] (HELO mail-fx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.220.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:24:42 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so6124531fxm.29 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:24:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cppSxDfCGKyzolbaWLuilFXRWl6ApPql/bgMsQpxl8A=; b=U4eFBTY7VMKYUynieoH4qUcZLh3goErs9MNic0ChxDfVjM2QlUhc9rYTOwDt7omPyc ENSppmEoz9pae7gSojCpK3NI8CioI9t5EGLlr/VEC02RSkxZfo2tmP6rgpoabAPdsRjT QF0Zya25ulH6WNfT3X3ULTu8ZoAPVIQnZKJKk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iCLC88jPyUFOGYcoq6OTCNHYYrVPpBRoWH7Gd2Lb8HXyXgwuNXtLK6VNiz5m2OVCdK 803p6YIt652tNTAkCrD3UjE5wcX80XrXrWLuMsDN4bWuait9WyDTnkIyp5gjT5JivH4L X9yDMcB5FPDvHYzvt49w3VLBXnNiUfxk6iw5Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.5 with SMTP id t5mr1128490wee.142.1258399460612; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:24:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911141443l4943be00q45111aec0b67bfcc@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911141443l4943be00q45111aec0b67bfcc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:24:20 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911161124p73a2a631u665ee28a765e332@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Custom Writable not working... From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64861d5dc4d047881f448 --0016e6d64861d5dc4d047881f448 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Something Something Date: Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:43 PM Subject: Custom Writable not working... To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Hello, I created a custom writable class called, TextPair, that's identical to the one in Tom White's O'Reilly book (page 97). The only difference is that the compare function works differently. In my case I want (1, 6) to compare equally to (6,1), so I have something like this... @Override public int compareTo(TextPair tp) { int cmpFirst = first.compareTo(tp.first); int cmpSecond = second.compareTo(tp.second); if (cmpFirst == 0 && cmpSecond == 0) { System.out.println("Equal: (" + this.toString() + ") and " + "(" + tp.toString() + ")"); return 0; } else { int cmpFirstSecond = first.compareTo(tp.second); int cmpSecondFirst = second.compareTo(tp.first); if (cmpFirstSecond == 0 && cmpSecondFirst == 0) { System.out.println("Equal: (" + this.toString() + ") and " + "(" + tp.toString() + ")"); return 0; } } System.out.println("!!NOT Equal: (" + this.toString() + ") and " + "(" + tp.toString() + ")"); return -1; } In my Mapper class I am emitting... context.write(new TextPair(first, second), new IntWritable(1)); So I am expecting that when my Reducer is called the keys: (1,4) & (4,1) would get combined. This is NOT happening. In fact, even (1,4) are not getting combined. In other words, the reducer is getting called multiple times with keys (1,4) (Makes sense?) What am I doing wrong? Also, I noticed that even after Reducer gets called the TextPair.compareTo method keeps getting called. By the way, my Reducer is very simple. It just adds counts (like the Word count program in the tutorial.) Please help. Thanks. --0016e6d64861d5dc4d047881f448-- From general-return-742-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 19:26:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51395 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 19:26:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 19:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 52778 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:26:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52692 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:26:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52682 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 19:26:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:26:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.152] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:26:10 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2328588fga.11 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:25:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CvNPTg5YNMj6gFTv1o5/I15mewxqbdYibDZkBB+Rw4A=; b=FPIq1wCKFd5Io8PbXwz2Pdxu0yKtLYHystI09AeCBH8L8dxfzbX4CX9bmAd55QSsbL ddyUwIukEC/du8AEZdX7E5m46R9UgPn7rB61+YwxDW1nJ5XD3BLWDhM3xfZOs6kmPuYr PCXUWSGC48iYN3YzkbeW5JuWhNgipbvGTr3ik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=H/2SyvcdHmzXGwBL/pYIWKw5G74cz4Sv36vrXeq3VNxPhdjbQsWVOYyIvrtZXCstCO OdpRpRJ+dTT4IdHrb50FQSEhAnuSeAEKpRDx3dH7WrSZ8YqFnqfAoupGASaSFBTO97s7 0K944TJzDW0dwUAyFJh0HoMFLlk7u4vBYZaFQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.194 with SMTP id u44mr485638wee.65.1258399548605; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:25:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <895334.52215.qm@web32203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1b3669280911161108p4fbe9d20i12dd564a121aecac@mail.gmail.com> <895334.52215.qm@web32203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:25:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911161125y32715fceub0d52fe98e68dd7e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e744148457047881fae3 --0016e6d7e744148457047881fae3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Goutham, Can you please take a look at my email titled.. "Custom Writable not working"? (I just sent it a few minutes ago.) It's similar to this one. The only difference is, instead of IntWritable I am using Text. But the sort in Map is not working as expected. Can you tell me why? Thanks. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote: > Thanks, appreciate it. > > Rajiv > > --- On Mon, 11/16/09, goutham patnaik wrote: > > From: goutham patnaik > Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 11:08 AM > > Rajiv, > > You could write your own class which implements the WritableComparable > interface and use this as your key class - all u need to do is implement > the write, readFields and compareTo methods - the map will then sort your > keys using this method : > > public class TupleKey implements WritableComparable { > IntWritable k1; > IntWritable k2; > ....... > } > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari >wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on > > key1, then on key2. > > > > Example: > > key1 key2 values > > ------------------------- > > 0001 0001 values... > > 0001 0002 values... > > 0002 0001 values... > > 0002 0005 values... > > > > > > I am thinking of the following solution approach: > > > > Define KEY = key1, key2 /* concatenate keys */. Override default > > HashPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. > > > > > > public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { > > > > public void configure(JobConf job) {} > > > > public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { > > > > return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % > numPartitions; > > } > > } > > > > Would this work? > > > > Does anyone have any better ideas? > > > > Thanks much, > > Rajiv > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d7e744148457047881fae3-- From general-return-743-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 19:44:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60440 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 19:44:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 19:44:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2916 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:44:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2832 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 19:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2808 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 19:44:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:44:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:44:02 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so6141616bwz.29 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:43:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=jholVNvDeXLnJKBAHNEDrHwlWAtqquZ5x6bUhHoxb7k=; b=GsLU9ZM32bWKqhEB+312xJX9L1Rb1Zm/on1dR63JjwQj9bxfrqrudU8MIGlXuLmDu+ XMRYSQV5CYirCQnGmydPmkCmqyto9dFK73r3LPQS8fI5OSXv6bpLqnVBe/zQJ9k01JlB VQw/YTcEl5YLTUkU/yP3U7SRQijfDqf+Yt/MY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Khvtif9k37Nha1QRUpyWDh/f1ZlKZE3YzMAV10C6KIsqb/vLsiUkAkQS5Y7uoS9LkY B9OZJ7RVQdTSfVtrupCWViZy9nv7lZm0OjKWlk41jGdX9ItUrYnad3d0a8SWkU5FX9OO 3TltFONPz8Hyt1Zh9zG169w2V3MNY8LgQtqF4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.5 with SMTP id t5mr1135783wee.142.1258400621958; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:43:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Values returned by Map to Reducer From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d648610e97d20478823a97 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d648610e97d20478823a97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Does Hadoop Mapreduce guarantee that the *values* returned by Mapper to the Reducer are sorted? Can I safely assume that? Would it always be true - at least for 'Text' type? public void reduce(Text key, *Iterable values*, Context context --0016e6d648610e97d20478823a97-- From general-return-744-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 20:17:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71033 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 20:17:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 20:17:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83474 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 20:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83387 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 20:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83377 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 20:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.136] (HELO web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:17:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 86190 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Nov 2009 20:17:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258402627; bh=iYgbiD7No/Du9mMVKVmMR3aDOaF7zXcOUWN1/TGkEfs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FcB/H0BaBd/PtGybnG31NlSuYy8KBwUnZRoCGt0oDjj6I5LVg0px3AGxAU91HElnHjCUmNhR7lhnFqfd8Ky1K8an0ZGWHcMnjTnlkkGA61fDASrwWdMf5klr+MnRdKewI536fBvc8R+R847MgZgwtxV50/De7CjAF4WCSTQHZSk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HZ+7dI9eXehRQgXF5w/nL9vfYdtpTplL1H72zdlLKogwqqjA/aiuik5vHIYIU+L+6dgllZuQhELc17bib/kqXaF6NeL1SshHsCpSCpH589Ew2CGGqbdayZMbQlw6avDbVilhmcKCyEW330S1dNfFJ5k2XadvWQ2R6+4kaRh39hg=; Message-ID: <937882.86142.qm@web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Us17y.AVM1m9.7ZNK38cHjc.Q1B0YEmgfXf0dU4I61UvlG5BFHluGGpFyxyswTs4LIY2uJx9vTSv9XNXDePS7Ysu63.7GCYObhujPagvYnt4f_5ZJ_p7uABVgltye0mAzr8vD3fV0ARCIpotEZws8boHAxVz8fNvxrqlNaWJQzjBNTXYc_Ja5KW4zvPcoq6IB7m44ilVSOw9E7OQMaAQrvfFay7jufmAmuJgGvN479t_.Tx_W0a_7ZKz_4D_9uAMoPNno22wBXlSQ.pTMlGaL3dciDi_K._9.Pt5R2M.hXXmoEEBmTO0wcCFcuAALoBsT1QgECvj8eYC8YP68STSTE5YoWo- Received: from [69.143.207.68] by web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:17:07 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:17:07 -0800 (PST) From: Rajiv Maheshwari Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1b3669280911161108p4fbe9d20i12dd564a121aecac@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1584925627-1258402627=:86142" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1584925627-1258402627=:86142 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On a second thought implementing WritableComparable will not help in my cas= e. I forgot to mention that I want to use multiple reducers. Records with s= ame key1 splitting across multiple reducers will break the logic. If only 1 reducer is being used, I guess sorting on multiple keys can be ac= complished just by concatenating the keys, unless one has the need to chang= e the compare method. Thanks, Rajiv --- On Mon, 11/16/09, goutham patnaik wrote: From: goutham patnaik Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 11:08 AM Rajiv, You could write your own class which implements the WritableComparable interface and use this as your key class -=A0 all u need to do is implement the write, readFields and compareTo methods - the map will then sort your keys using this method : public class TupleKey implements WritableComparable { IntWritable k1; IntWritable k2; ....... } On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote= : > Hi everyone, > > I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on > key1, then on key2. > > Example: > key1=A0 key2=A0=A0=A0values > ------------------------- > 0001=A0 0001=A0 values... > 0001=A0 0002=A0 values... > 0002=A0 0001=A0 values... > 0002=A0 0005=A0 values... > > > I am thinking of the following solution approach: > > Define KEY =3D key1, key2=A0=A0=A0/* concatenate keys */. Override defaul= t > HashPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. > > > public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { > > public void configure(JobConf job) {} > > public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { > >=A0 =A0=A0=A0return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % numPa= rtitions; >=A0 =A0=A0=A0} > } > > Would this work? > > Does anyone have any better ideas? > > Thanks much, > Rajiv > > > > > =0A=0A=0A --0-1584925627-1258402627=:86142-- From general-return-745-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 20:46:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82104 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 20:46:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 20:46:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 47995 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 20:46:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47930 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 20:46:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47920 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 20:46:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:46:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.22.98] (HELO web112120.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.22.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:46:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 76856 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Nov 2009 20:45:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258404356; bh=/gYgTc33rpUIXgZ27hp5LHxz1sHznJMVjJYIp9EOrwE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Wcz9/RqHfrmC4q4LFecNDF52f3/AhLRP3EwNcEjvUh85rSynUZzjyhivHKTDtidTXXPepiusBlYszmYhVDc9S+XZ5cQ2vjB0ddbRMGSxgwCqC0xiYUGu5f5OpOr5bvbkAowG0dv/9/0y9QQW5KqRDZAdVC+gtrIqZJ39Yya+mhg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nD6Jjuk/UNKKIPFmZsGVTVveIK+CkJ46LFArUHD6O8c7vRSPZ/av5JSW8XMpL0c/dB7JVx/0/zisGzF3FeBo/RhbK+gvR1bvJtiPfeAFSmMKDJMrVQrhmKt5qeIOWrvX97G4a/gvYEcKPJuYhDiUugup1V8dmd0XwB/1vskFQ0U=; Message-ID: <240158.76395.qm@web112120.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hp8Siq8VM1kEpcvoYdcdQSMbfBspM5zUo2tWbh0C46TjELxtuZDmXrxuzWFW3azIxp3IlwhJJLO_rPMa0luBFDRAJOCf2ZBfkXhECTyt6C2Y04uwXG5JxWtELrAoCRb0Dd_LV36J9F_zNgIA0X9m9IE29lRCWYOojllPjkHsyfr37Hb8hF3FxbgBL2p5_nRlljsjpDvapO627EiVrl7ULppl0Mlkp6iOd_v0Qy8_y6Qoc0J5Aa4HG6X52kTHaqxkug-- Received: from [64.172.17.3] by web112120.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:45:56 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:45:56 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Gao Subject: What's different of 1)namenode metadata 2)image and 3)edit logs? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, core-dev@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1555827857-1258404356=:76395" --0-1555827857-1258404356=:76395 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii What are the differences between the 3 concepts: (1) namenode metadata, (2) namenode image, and (3) edit logs? BTW,I know the secondary namenode backups namenode data. I was told that there is another daemon which also backups meta data . Is that true? What is the daemon? Thanks. --0-1555827857-1258404356=:76395-- From general-return-746-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 16 22:40:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33494 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 22:40:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 22:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 85368 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 22:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85280 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 22:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49966 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 22:22:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=PqSkAbMKpPLzN4r52FHYA+VCUpNckBJpodeRmr11/YH1IwP6uQv5kmVhTM49SX4t User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:20:49 -0800 Subject: Re: What's different of 1)namenode metadata 2)image and 3)edit logs? From: Boris Shkolnik To: , CC: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: What's different of 1)namenode metadata 2)image and 3)edit logs? Thread-Index: AcpnCwzEjk9fEIVvN0y9SnaYYe7Kag== In-Reply-To: <240158.76395.qm@web112120.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2009 22:21:24.0138 (UTC) FILETIME=[21B658A0:01CA670B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org NameNode metadata - is in memory data structures describing file system structure (directories, files, and file's blocks). NameNode image is on-disk representation of the metadata. (fsimage file). Edit logs - is a journal that keeps all the events that cause changes in the metadata and allows restoration in case of NameNode failure. Secondary Namenode - runs checkpoints from time to time. During a checkpoint edit logs are merged into metadata and saved to fsimage, which is pushed to the NameNode. Boris. On 11/16/09 12:45 PM, "Steve Gao" wrote: > What are the differences between the 3 concepts: (1) namenode metadata, (2) > namenode image, and (3) edit logs? > > BTW,I know the secondary namenode backups namenode data. > > I was told that there is another daemon which also backups meta data . Is that > true? What is the daemon? Thanks. > > > > > > From general-return-747-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 03:29:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43824 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 03:29:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 03:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 44439 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 03:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44294 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 03:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44284 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 03:29:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:29:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.188] (HELO mail-iw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.223.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:29:32 +0000 Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so4904976iwn.5 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SFi1yYg5EDjOebU96xzuCF4BUcUo+CJ2fW15IhvVMBE=; b=t2HwNRUIZr0yqMeYDwsiXIMxpFNfYzV9+RjBD/lM1akBqXtfsQxH1pi2j85dGVXx8h zbNmcGgrWZ5z89Udq3IRDvd/CxDm8VNTG9V2XoHMvLMCUitNtWZ5WWp9M8tPgyj9wgo0 V7GjcGuclwlCcKcevMOtDoXtaFRHVwiplmc2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QorCiLUmsxghQs2HhGf2/gR02w3kTzyXFbW8SxLv+nWVw9SSY+lbuN3rJ0QAVVSk8M oELi1uaUNa5ojEDohRemBZCgg5GztzoFeC8oe1Eu95swtPxTpaDJ1nLAl4OLyYACx5HT xsLxrfD5HjaiMzdUmgyn1KPkUzN/rNqVxtfO0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.6.79 with SMTP id 15mr4858896iby.36.1258428551664; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:29:11 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Values returned by Map to Reducer From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151774123ecc1770047888ba87 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151774123ecc1770047888ba87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes. H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/11/17 Something Something > Does Hadoop Mapreduce guarantee that the *values* returned by Mapper to the > Reducer are sorted? Can I safely assume that? Would it always be true - > at > least for 'Text' type? > > public void reduce(Text key, *Iterable values*, Context context > --00151774123ecc1770047888ba87-- From general-return-748-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 03:48:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48628 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 03:48:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 03:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 51328 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 03:48:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51198 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 03:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51188 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 03:48:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:48:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:48:05 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so3990753pwi.29 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+pxlUJN08x3Nw84eBlPq3a9hyDJY1SMMplEdrhU3rX4=; b=ZKe4NXXCIUNO9B92j0SjEvRmJkISHwFIPZpEzD28k3IfH8Ju28fy+JYs1hL9sFb+5T e7aI0vL2PXNP5uGIkm6sHFqSdImbyNYF8ztiZbVsPMfwCsLdKDHOZJhE8ufjaWwBfSRQ U2dhA2CRGwLQItibjZxFLW+HqeAWojakBhoEE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W5gZVFS+Ky4h9b4joLtwE+pl91xGVfcm9Anh7vYKG+JwIz4F/nBdsic/qlebqswaff C4q9xyu4mqwTzr0eSocnP8+bPsmMkv9bTTl+aydJv1e1EPhoJ9dHn2ZDvmhXAAQLpBt1 TvHwHOVsnLL04hF8As4fXsgWlnuQ6ErwG9c28= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.199.14 with SMTP id w14mr487314rvf.63.1258429663877; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:47:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:47:43 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0911161947h5e001e15q9a15816f972aa08e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Values returned by Map to Reducer From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd250c2171bb0047888fdcd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd250c2171bb0047888fdcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Does Hadoop Mapreduce guarantee that the *values* returned by Mapper to the > Reducer are sorted? Can I safely assume that? Would it always be true - > at > least for 'Text' type? > > public void reduce(Text key, *Iterable values*, Context context > No, the values will *not* be sorted. In fact, it will be non-deterministic between multiple runs of the job with the same input. The keys will always be sorted. If you want the values to be sorted, you need to take additional steps. Please look at the SecondarySort example. It shows exactly how to get the values sorted in the order you desire. -- Owen --000e0cd250c2171bb0047888fdcd-- From general-return-749-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 04:11:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57253 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 04:11:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 04:11:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 62437 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 04:11:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62329 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 04:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62319 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 04:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.188] (HELO mail-iw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.223.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:11:19 +0000 Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so4925518iwn.5 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FUME7HjkGUZtAnSh/GSypixY2+01H1yyEXXrGAtbFFY=; b=Ik3lfkGokZ47c7uvA/CRftYdiLC85niarf2XtSbuwWtGUFNjzfbsEdNcp2AAnbvHz9 xtyfVFTrLIdigKCkackOFKDMfRpoMxyIFY+o7Z/m7DztQx6sTFUs9qxsNCNDxxL9Oi8C tzW+bwVi/yV8H9nli04hB4b+jd5eUHCkA3IGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J0WQbkDG1SF4FvdySmEvzQNQ/4RViuSo5d7ItqOu2kDxjiFoH7nNJJb2jHBxWIsZ0J 04I4aoQyjk+uUUwkgmHHJ88JwpTeiOQ3bSqFK8RUjWzAQeAvsol9W8xQOOVFvwe1beLO HKa76nLvz547hvjcQcgdf2Azt8pUyFKUw5tQQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.158.205 with SMTP id g13mr960199ibx.30.1258431058069; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b0911161947h5e001e15q9a15816f972aa08e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911161143t4102be0brd0555eed21dd8572@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b0911161947h5e001e15q9a15816f972aa08e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:10:58 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Values returned by Map to Reducer From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501416d30c7680478895009 --00504501416d30c7680478895009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Oh Yes, you are right, i replied to this mail, saying yes. However, that yes was for the keys which are sorted. sorry for the confusion. H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com 2009/11/17 Owen O'Malley > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Does Hadoop Mapreduce guarantee that the *values* returned by Mapper to > the > > Reducer are sorted? Can I safely assume that? Would it always be true - > > at > > least for 'Text' type? > > > > public void reduce(Text key, *Iterable values*, Context context > > > > No, the values will *not* be sorted. In fact, it will be non-deterministic > between multiple runs of the job with the same input. The keys will always > be sorted. If you want the values to be sorted, you need to take additional > steps. Please look at the SecondarySort example. It shows exactly how to > get > the values sorted in the order you desire. > > -- Owen > --00504501416d30c7680478895009-- From general-return-750-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 07:38:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28370 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 07:38:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 07:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 56694 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 07:38:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56615 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 07:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56604 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 07:38:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:38:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of prashantsethia007@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:38:34 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1255281pxi.5 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:38:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=0RLSxxuJoipEiwmZvTCjMOf2n2PFadQLtieYgxL+pH0=; b=cfTUeEUmO3j1aNZJtx/0bos9cFCORpQcxEtyhyf2fnjtrEydE8eI1SoD6BWczpMbYM xRE4+zAhiJwiPBu1G8w7JIcSPvePzMbaMo8c6rqx+KqCgUVzGCnBAyPZ7nMu9EG145st xItd2lM8FnpRPYdmXzvjKYxIjSTeAx3ChXHvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=l5nM9L3pDzlq1Ayqd0dyuaEtraa2Hhyrq9rwCEzOnwkyLOS/DovZDNsQnLedD07Sz1 foCrUdWlKQW4Ey7L5CIE8ET8DLBQLOJvjPaOiHN+uq8QCD++5gBhXyotGirHqr0qU/cE 2acyFy4KZljKm5W1P3zT6vAtM6I32HuTjSWbc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.100.4 with SMTP id c4mr17536292wam.13.1258443492846; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:38:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:08:12 +0530 Message-ID: <1eb371370911162338i1875ae15wefd5711eeb70ed8d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Release of Hadoop 0.21 From: prashant sethia To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64dde645c6e0504788c3536 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64dde645c6e0504788c3536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-385 Has anyone any idea about the new release of Hadoop (0.21) ? Regards, Prashant. --0016e64dde645c6e0504788c3536-- From general-return-751-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 11:29:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92175 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 11:29:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 11:29:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 77643 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 11:29:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77558 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 11:29:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77548 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 11:29:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:29:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goutham.patnaik@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:29:33 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so4376718yxe.5 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=MsdBcCohGZ5DNm7H6TbCcP177O0J4CTaPM9IOxE897A=; b=O9gJh9CmzRJBm5maA8rYeaURbZ7ZS4Y0h/2i9YkZPuX+WFnlMI6Z2iy3fjabjUKlxh Dc6BxXNzu26xgxRbT3lJuGw8fOf+6V7r3ielFWRvypusLi7TBfHQMug+wc/XEfESvLSx 9b1T3i7YPLi5Kr1d1qp8Aed65+5wOI0FAlQS8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=J4D7+EEC2SHm6VUfMyR33lkwHnrFaoIKreOMQ/014XI0wryIpjDAS1U46g7FrJGlNA lITAs+MWxCUmmwr7Jqu8vW8zCOtOqRAjY8Me+sayqRYGot5Et1YbEFGYlPp1XNE3waFp q72tfFPlbPgfQLaMmMSSXKGQX6JtT30d3dEfQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.28.27 with SMTP id b27mr5108497ybb.59.1258457352355; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <937882.86142.qm@web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1b3669280911161108p4fbe9d20i12dd564a121aecac@mail.gmail.com> <937882.86142.qm@web32205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: goutham patnaik Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:28:52 -0800 Message-ID: <1b3669280911170328t23a2ac7ck300c8bf2b9df5fa1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd756cc73e51304788f6f84 --000e0cd756cc73e51304788f6f84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 you want tuple keys (key1, key2) that have the same values for key1 to go to the same reducer ? You can do this by writing your own partition function as you mentioned in your previous email - the partition function can simply use key1 to determine how to partition the data to make sure that the data that reaches a reducer is sorted the way you want it (first by key1 and then by key2), you can write your own key class that implements WritableComparable does that answer your question ? Goutham On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote: > On a second thought implementing WritableComparable will not help in my > case. I forgot to mention that I want to use multiple reducers. Records with > same key1 splitting across multiple reducers will break the logic. > > If only 1 reducer is being used, I guess sorting on multiple keys can be > accomplished just by concatenating the keys, unless one has the need to > change the compare method. > > Thanks, > Rajiv > > --- On Mon, 11/16/09, goutham patnaik wrote: > > From: goutham patnaik > Subject: Re: Map-reduce sorting on multiple keys > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 11:08 AM > > Rajiv, > > You could write your own class which implements the WritableComparable > interface and use this as your key class - all u need to do is implement > the write, readFields and compareTo methods - the map will then sort your > keys using this method : > > public class TupleKey implements WritableComparable { > IntWritable k1; > IntWritable k2; > ....... > } > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Rajiv Maheshwari >wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have a need to sort the output of map on 2 keys (key1, key2) - first on > > key1, then on key2. > > > > Example: > > key1 key2 values > > ------------------------- > > 0001 0001 values... > > 0001 0002 values... > > 0002 0001 values... > > 0002 0005 values... > > > > > > I am thinking of the following solution approach: > > > > Define KEY = key1, key2 /* concatenate keys */. Override default > > HashPartitioner and use only key1 in hashCode computation. > > > > > > public class HashPartitioner implements Partitioner { > > > > public void configure(JobConf job) {} > > > > public int getPartition(K2 key, V2 value, int numPartitions) { > > > > return (key.getKey1().hashCode() & Integer.MAX_VALUE) % > numPartitions; > > } > > } > > > > Would this work? > > > > Does anyone have any better ideas? > > > > Thanks much, > > Rajiv > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --000e0cd756cc73e51304788f6f84-- From general-return-752-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 17 12:08:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1715 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2009 12:08:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2009 12:08:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8111 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 12:08:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8035 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2009 12:08:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8023 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2009 12:08:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:08:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:08:54 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2997646qyk.5 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:08:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.39.69 with SMTP id f5mr1201079qce.107.1258459713609; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:08:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eb371370911162338i1875ae15wefd5711eeb70ed8d@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eb371370911162338i1875ae15wefd5711eeb70ed8d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:08:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release of Hadoop 0.21 From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364275f731a04404788ffc83 --0016364275f731a04404788ffc83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Prashant, There are 24 outstanding issues before 0.21 can be released: * 23 from 0.21 branch: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS/fixforversion/12314046 * 1 from the Append branch: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS/fixforversion/12314142 If you see an issue you think you can tackle, please submit a patch! Regards, Jeff On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:38 PM, prashant sethia < prashantsethia007@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-385 > > Has anyone any idea about the new release of Hadoop (0.21) ? > > Regards, > Prashant. > --0016364275f731a04404788ffc83-- From general-return-753-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 18 23:25:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39266 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2009 23:25:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2009 23:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 96229 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2009 23:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96000 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2009 23:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95971 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2009 23:25:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:25:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.241.231.239] (HELO mail.archive.org) (207.241.231.239) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:25:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.archive.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F022ADDC4 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.archive.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.archive.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id TqOYsdYW92q0 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:38:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.30.0.149] (unknown [208.70.28.201]) by mail.archive.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83EB52ADDC3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:38:01 -0800 (PST) From: Alexis Rossi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-224--1040846191 Subject: Internet Archive hiring web crawl Tech Lead Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:25:11 -0800 Message-Id: <9814EB55-7BF3-4E76-8833-EEA64C147D71@archive.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-224--1040846191 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes ...and someone with hadoop experience would be very welcome! We're hiring for a web crawling engineer to be the tech lead on a new project to crawl and archive the entire Internet. The non-profit Internet Archive is a really fun, collaborative place to work, and has just relocated to a beautiful old converted church in the inner Richmond district of San Francisco. We're looking for people who are interested in crawling, analysis, and working on big open source projects. Here's the job description: http://www.archive.org/about/webjobs.php#wwcengineer Thanks, Alexis Rossi alexis@archive.org --Apple-Mail-224--1040846191-- From general-return-754-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 19 03:42:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6107 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2009 03:42:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2009 03:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 80775 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 03:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80627 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 03:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80615 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2009 03:42:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:42:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.23.23.233] (HELO mail.osdbzine.net) (67.23.23.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:42:00 +0000 Received: from www.osdbzine.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.osdbzine.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCED21EC15A for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:42:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from 67.191.167.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user editor@osdbzine.net) by www.osdbzine.net with HTTP; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:42:29 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:42:29 -0600 (CST) Subject: Nov/Dec 2009 Open Source Database Magazine Released! From: "Keith Murphy" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Exciting news! The next issue of Open Source Database Magazine (http://www.osdbzine.net) is now available. This information-packed issue has over 60 pages of information including: * Firebird’s Road Trip and What’s New with 2.5 * Coding Corner: Trees – Where’s the Performance? * PostgreSQL’s tsvector: Secret Sauce for Search Engines * The Lab: The XtraBackup Program for MySQL – Part Two * Drizzle – A Lightweight Database for the Web * Kontrollbase: Enterprise grade MySQL monitoring and analytics * Creating a Twitter Mashup with MongoDB * Introducing LucidDB Plus the usual news and views. All of this for $4.95. It is simply the biggest and the best issue we have ever released. Ready to sign up? Head over to http://www.osdbzine.net/signup.html to register and then you can download the new issue. Curious as to what this is all about? I just posted an online addendum to the Drizzle article in our free content section (http://www.osdbzine.net/free.html) that will give you a taste of what you can expect. Thanks to the contributors. You all did a great job and I appreciate it! Sorry the website isn’t currently as polished as the magazine. While it doesn’t look pretty, it is functioning. And now that the magazine is out I can turn my attention to it again. If you experience any problems let me know at editor AT osdbzine.net. thanks, keith -- Editor Open Source Database Magazine http://www.osdbzine.net editor@osdbzine.net From general-return-755-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 19 06:53:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49213 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2009 06:53:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 602 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 510 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51242 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2009 09:47:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Subject: FW: how to run the mapreduce job from localfilesystem but in hadoop cluster(fully distributed mode) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA6834.7F385CCE" Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:39:46 +0545 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <325521DDB16A1F4B90085DCCE3FFD12B5AD63C@mailsrv.nepasoft.com.np> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: how to run the mapreduce job from localfilesystem but in hadoop cluster(fully distributed mode) Thread-Index: AcpoNFli17vyzowCQAySd/Spww0KqgAAHhoQ From: "Roshan Karki" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA6834.7F385CCE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 From: Roshan Karki=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:34 PM To: 'common-user@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: how to run the mapreduce job from localfilesystem but in hadoop cluster(fully distributed mode) =20 Hi , I have setup hadoop in a fully distributed mode(hadoop cluster). The default file sytem is hdfs.I have two nodes cluster. The map reduce job works fine when I give inputfile from hdfs location and output is also generated in hdfs when running WordCount example. My hadoop-site.xml looks like this: =20 fs.default.name hdfs://server1.example.com mapred.job.tracker server1.example.com:9001 dfs.data.dir /home/admin/hadoop/dfs/data dfs.name.dir /home/admin/hadoop/dfs/name hadoop.tmp.dir /tmp/hadoop mapred.system.dir /hadoop/mapred/system dfs.replication 2 =20 The problem is that I don't want to give hdfs location for fileinput and want to generated output in localfilesystem also giving the inputfile from local but I want to do this in hadoop fully distributed mode configuration(keeping the hadoop cluster alive). Giving default filesystem other than hdfs doesn't run cluster.so Is there any way to achieve this? I also have nfs server running. All the nodes in hadoop cluster are also the client of nfs,so they can share the exported /home/admin directory. Does nfs help in this regard? Do I have to change my hadoop-site.xml.If so what would it looks like? Any help will be heartly appreciated. I am looking forward for the kind response. =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA6834.7F385CCE-- From general-return-756-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 19 06:53:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49314 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2009 06:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 1923 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1839 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 06:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34995 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2009 00:50:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Message-Id: <8F1CCF11-3A9E-40FB-9399-A643C45CBCC6@schwartz-omalley.com> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Welcome to Zheng Shao to the Hadoop PMC Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:49:28 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hadoop PMC would like to welcome Zheng Shao as the newest member. Zheng started on MapReduce, but has spent a lot of time helping the Hive subproject. Zheng, please add yourself to the Hadoop TLP website's list of the PMC. Thanks for your hard work on behalf of Hadoop, Owen From general-return-757-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 19 11:19:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9540 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2009 11:19:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2009 11:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 75360 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 11:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75294 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2009 11:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75284 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2009 11:19:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:19:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2C51BA5F9 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:35 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sezNhB5ZE24p for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0531BA563 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:35 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1259234304.95484@2WvvJ/O+eIy7Qsd8ZpmkQw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nAJBINwD001243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:24 GMT Message-ID: <4B05297F.4070305@apache.org> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:18:23 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: how to run the mapreduce job from localfilesystem but in hadoop cluster(fully distributed mode) References: <325521DDB16A1F4B90085DCCE3FFD12B5AD63C@mailsrv.nepasoft.com.np> In-Reply-To: <325521DDB16A1F4B90085DCCE3FFD12B5AD63C@mailsrv.nepasoft.com.np> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nAJBINwD001243 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roshan Karki wrote: > > > > The problem is that I don't want to give hdfs location for fileinput and > want to generated output in localfilesystem also giving the inputfile > from local but I want to do this in hadoop fully distributed mode > configuration(keeping the hadoop cluster alive). > Either upload the data files to the HDFS filestore before the run , or use file: URLs and make sure that your files are visible on every task tracker by mounting the same network drive on the same path, such as file:/mount/nfs/server1/work/data From general-return-758-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 20 06:20:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12517 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2009 06:20:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2009 06:20:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 63292 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2009 06:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63217 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2009 06:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63207 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2009 06:20:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:20:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:20:35 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so2131925pzk.5 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:20:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ySycgGayCOAT3hdz16dTejZsD3p9zKlHycjiQ67RN7M=; b=iCISKduTLoZUkFwmUaMk9GXSllitfKLe8qgaeqxPJRMmIcjJ+x2h75osPQxQnJluud W2XoenG0W69E7/4R/i84z52TtFBi0gb4lxG9p+BcKs/v5dLMQ7lrPJZ0klBZJi7qQLHq wWXo12dYvjCMojJF+7Nri0BbutSe9BCgw0PZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aPRklRqwW8cS66kk4wvGjXrb8hGh9RwdgQ7TaTl842Aixl6+dNFQxEQfc1m6U0rLUY aURR1cM3vGFdtIwy9y9qvWcjzwFrAiFav738DgLZoRjiLmvQD/NcwHJYFz10bPlajdSk drVw24/M3cQoYufGUjN6Zda1fIZXaWuHrg474= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.141.4 with SMTP id o4mr68644rvd.257.1258698014785; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:20:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:20:14 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af20911192220q65188c86o3eda579da6943da2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Error when putting too large folder into Hadoop From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, all I'm using hadoop-0.19.1, which is included in nutch 1.0. The HDFS is deployed on 12 nodes, and they work fine. Now I want to put a folder which is about 100GB large into hadoop. Here is the command: bin/hadoop fs -put /srcfolder /pub When the source folder is less than 10GB, everything is OK. But if the folder is too large (How large I haven't figured out yet). It will fail in the process. What's the problem? How can I fix it? Following are the error messages on the screen: 2009-11-20 11:31:09,170 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.140:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:09,282 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_4524254776889347494_31880 2009-11-20 11:31:15,298 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.141:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:15,298 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_-6096773602253771497_31884 2009-11-20 11:31:22,105 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.141:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:22,106 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_7476142191552180978_31895 2009-11-20 11:31:28,109 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.145:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:28,109 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_1702775959905886525_31903 2009-11-20 11:31:34,114 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Could not read from stream 2009-11-20 11:31:34,114 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_-6529348247759206930_31906 2009-11-20 11:31:47,507 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.144:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:47,508 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_8773438940339692415_32051 2009-11-20 11:31:53,511 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.139:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:53,511 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_-2934984271889679562_32063 2009-11-20 11:31:59,515 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.145:50010 2009-11-20 11:31:59,515 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_-9114974684513095559_32065 2009-11-20 11:32:05,519 INFO DFSClient - Exception in createBlockOutputStream java.io.IOException: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.145:50010 2009-11-20 11:32:05,519 INFO DFSClient - Abandoning block blk_8604459663942116813_32071 2009-11-20 11:32:11,580 WARN DFSClient - DataStreamer Exception: java.io.IOException: Unable to create new block. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DFSClient.java:2722) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2000(DFSClient.java:1996) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient.java:2183) 2009-11-20 11:32:11,580 WARN DFSClient - Error Recovery for block blk_8604459663942116813_32071 bad datanode[1] nodes == null 2009-11-20 11:32:11,580 WARN DFSClient - Could not get block locations. Source file "/pub/comic/_Incoming_/1.wma" - Aborting... put: Bad connect ack with firstBadLink 10.214.10.145:50010 From general-return-759-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 21 07:06:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99945 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2009 07:06:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2009 07:06:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 88258 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2009 07:06:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88174 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2009 07:06:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88162 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2009 07:06:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:06:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.34] (HELO web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:05:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 72558 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Nov 2009 07:05:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258787134; bh=WXqKcB2ouaRNHIRTbEBArAHJcgMROYZtFmjoCneC8kA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yKKIahB1OTh+Ib1tTPpiaJ4k1g5jCCNvJmc9MIXiHfzIOjyPUY8ugu3LshTsFZJUzfJdfvDqjF1U7SFROWJZ0B7mNTAXGYnREpAw3fGQIKVgXjeTRO4o436GTnKaosduy4qrHUOc5VbswSU53r4zqAhoJG0Agigow+OmSxmS6u0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3l35LyPNMtXNuzF2fR06ZjI7/iBOv3wJp8orD4p2B1dBmxsX6wN7mvWpY1BJPTvazdiDVYb0fqIN7k/RFfPFEedrnsTG4V+99fSFk6teNe1H8Z5O+peTYur8z0JxiXTnzYVAy+76tYsYJDE0OluELVXsLGoSxvNfed/hlboYFG0=; Message-ID: <235810.71840.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: _XYKaSQVM1ltiyq7LD0Jmtr3w4r0t8zNmPo9arXG_SD1zEEFhgKgXJZRDsrObCbmENh1s1W17RElVYeKtfUwb9p06XaOWlePVzyGxvlhwpQc.KEiywsICo27GRhkcRZMoBeDIbBW4hwhGBjfFsr6eGQHM_46X_afb4yM9AxsJWRYKFXyrUt9D7ER3a6yDIUYHnfMzaOci6abyldaKmCjgTthiOSmxLJVFVi3X.x.q5_aYcFKzaA9MGm2.qfowXQe1qYnak.sgWQIfW_heHlRlWjEaK4vuRfq1wAFCwkV_0rl3_OjCBAdwfot.sg- Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:05:33 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/211.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:05:33 -0800 (PST) From: himanshu chandola Subject: reduce copier failed To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I have a reduce copier that dies away everytime my 10 iterations of map and reduce pass through: java.io.IOException: attempt_200910061342_0139_r_000001_0The reduce copier failed at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:255) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) Finally the job dies due to this. I thought that it could happen due to low diskspace, but I've estimated the disk space required by the reduce output and the current free disk space is enough to accomodate this. If anyone could point out to anything it'll be great! I'm running cloudera's build :Version: 0.18.3-14. Thanks Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-760-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 00:58:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91799 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 00:58:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 00:58:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 54890 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 00:57:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54797 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 00:57:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54787 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 00:57:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:57:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:57:56 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so790948ewy.29 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:57:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=LK/A2khQuQzgQ05JoQCu8gBXqcCVA/BWStzmlDFyEmE=; b=P2tIf01/jQYDTokAgUejwYWdKxAbzSCIiIPdQqv4Mz6Q820gGN/W5Y5LqDqGsSypy5 rf9adXS8edQUIbQ0Lh4AQiLJlwjpUKR6dZeWn4/1LRfasnp9M/i/FrYJ6YY7GuyYoY41 dvBgc5puGGoDpcqqX2azsRryhjTFhjGO5HYeM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LBxv9Rjia0xXLciRf3v2FH7FSznSulzQ3zGztQtDkhaJ/Ud5tFntGBDBmHAAMzQJG7 4XkV1S/FFkKJC+7/6bF2K4BA1ROmdNLy+eqqyDBRRGU4u63ledY8hFAyzHhXCql89TtI tlee1ngonajZI7f6ZHRtPkObOk/yQmyMTmErc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.12 with SMTP id b12mr983975wef.93.1258851454993; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:57:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:57:34 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6da2e7eccc7150478eb3156 --0016e6da2e7eccc7150478eb3156 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's happening behind the scene.) I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a message saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP address of the slave. Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 instance to the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need the "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, but how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I am dumb :) Should I FTP it? Please help. Thanks. --0016e6da2e7eccc7150478eb3156-- From general-return-761-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 01:30:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96194 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 01:30:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 01:30:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 60874 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 01:30:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60777 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 01:30:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60767 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 01:30:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:30:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.48] (HELO smtp2.4emm.com) (69.18.222.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:30:51 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB02.4emm.local ([192.168.161.133]) with mapi; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:29:55 -0500 From: Jason Lotz To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:30:28 -0500 Subject: Re: reduce copier failed Thread-Topic: reduce copier failed Thread-Index: AcprE0sVcF4emhi4SYqdDdP4J3hCDQ== Message-ID: <117E5534-0D2C-4B7B-880F-71BBCEB08C68@explorysmedical.com> References: <235810.71840.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <235810.71840.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Are you writing to /tmp? Depending on your OS and configuration, you =20 might be dealing with an issue where the folder does not have the =20 capability of growing to the full size of the available disk space. =20 This is a common default config for various Linux distros for the /tmp =20 directory. Jason On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:05 AM, himanshu chandola wrote: > Hi, > I have a reduce copier that dies away everytime my 10 iterations of =20 > map and reduce pass through: > java.io.IOException: attempt_200910061342_0139_r_000001_0The reduce =20 > copier failed > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:255) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main=20 > (TaskTracker.java:2210) > > > Finally the job dies due to this. I thought that it could happen due =20 > to low diskspace, but I've estimated the disk space required by the =20 > reduce output and the current free disk space is enough to =20 > accomodate this. > > If anyone could point out to anything it'll be great! I'm running =20 > cloudera's build :Version: 0.18.3-14. > > > Thanks > > > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > From general-return-762-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 02:12:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2145 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 02:12:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 02:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 74179 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 02:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74097 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 02:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74087 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 02:12:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:12:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:12:38 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so3082696pxi.2 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:12:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B6deWrktnt7jbMPbJCovdCoewzDId1coR39o/Bo7YSs=; b=tUDgPMl27jg8Ncimi6NGHf0KWmc5LVmdQVUyqQ9JTraEGBp3oKGPrKYDS+F5HZOpZT VcWYzc7IvL5WS5Mb9u7uXBkjJnzdIkbZPowep2bvjcvP4AwyVahtLBLwXw0O1IUFchs6 oA90xYLZGcay1qfZXnsiIH6jUeMLMZM93tKEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ITR2vmvzKmKZ7B5fAytHpT6MUMnBK/oZxTKpnqLKtef7iMCJ5aTVeKkwZ0gJZR/oVv lfaLkPEuvCYoRU2yA3Sq/Duc69CO/KXNrHn/RdKUMC4JnWkFzKBh/zbhGdtFVcqr95Cr K4m7b4YQX/BoVXXEWZZDenf2ySvSkskXiEZJs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.3 with SMTP id i3mr336302wfa.147.1258855937551; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:12:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:12:17 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ad14fb2e510478ec3cdd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502ad14fb2e510478ec3cdd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine Jeff Zhang On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's happening > behind the scene.) > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > message > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP address of > the slave. > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 instance to > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need the > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, but > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I am > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > Please help. Thanks. > --00504502ad14fb2e510478ec3cdd-- From general-return-763-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 03:12:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10892 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 03:12:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 03:12:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 94475 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 03:12:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94339 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 03:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94326 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 03:12:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:12:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.38] (HELO web38407.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:11:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 14088 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2009 03:11:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1258859496; bh=kOAZuAXw9at3K2MXhinE+PEaRe+umwLlCc8LlXnr3RU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SbS89G9Qonp9OE3EcD8ViNSkwr6BQ8R72XtOHVZYjoKjyqP+txnfIHOqUCVTcAOdMzwlk1upi7SREYc8pUKjE7nEq9Fmbs1ikVebvE8IcSsejd9uU48kwZnMzCFhk0p/vDjfqB/SoS9xIgNtJgQlv8X16qAeLEtChalECO46Q7U= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LSFlaQAQmyO9cjMKsVzwPHzSigFzXZDoILlPhbzTRbg4gOyXcPQRkqIvXY0R/pCtUBSo9aEmnjCGtK1/H2TAJVFpMdbBQPdur2FxY7a5jpgULrMRaerEKbJSfPlYramQjAyYiHkSqAs5cxvTn3C7L6CmkywwdAJtZ+wM3ch1QQ4=; Message-ID: <172592.13790.qm@web38407.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: AzNYOMQVM1mi721khBZrSh41OKMviyfSXqkE4YrWa1RU1KWHmrOb6aZ9AKcXzM0ZcZ_L9eh2X9V5.PXTC5d8QDby.qdkqv4M1dvD6fZ1SbpmK.KPY.75LcKqo8BP9GRRN1gJS7YT5TZWbJNygU055yQP_E2I_PgCVyG3LtS12G7Zx2O0xirof8rBnb4Q38Gw0hYR0YQH2uV3EApr_DLYWcUSc3WQAUS4pOOkG4m4fz0CU46tEET37Pws_pgExVzxhIpp89AjeIIDwtPrZCswqAao.RLujNy1YU0RxGMKantSUQwml2SWwhmyA3MYWqG6ztwu5g5w_2lH1IOwo78GVpLp6OLL7ZdLJa.Ovx6D2OSI1S9cChKOOudq Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38407.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:11:36 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/211.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <235810.71840.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <117E5534-0D2C-4B7B-880F-71BBCEB08C68@explorysmedical.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:11:36 -0800 (PST) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: reduce copier failed To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <117E5534-0D2C-4B7B-880F-71BBCEB08C68@explorysmedical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am writing to a particular partition in the nodes of my cluster. Is that the only reason that this could happen ? Or does anyone know of any other cases ? Thanks. Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: Jason Lotz To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 8:30:28 PM Subject: Re: reduce copier failed Are you writing to /tmp? Depending on your OS and configuration, you might be dealing with an issue where the folder does not have the capability of growing to the full size of the available disk space. This is a common default config for various Linux distros for the /tmp directory. Jason On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:05 AM, himanshu chandola wrote: > Hi, > I have a reduce copier that dies away everytime my 10 iterations of > map and reduce pass through: > java.io.IOException: attempt_200910061342_0139_r_000001_0The reduce > copier failed > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:255) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main > (TaskTracker.java:2210) > > > Finally the job dies due to this. I thought that it could happen due > to low diskspace, but I've estimated the disk space required by the > reduce output and the current free disk space is enough to > accomodate this. > > If anyone could point out to anything it'll be great! I'm running > cloudera's build :Version: 0.18.3-14. > > > Thanks > > > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > From general-return-764-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 05:39:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26458 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 05:39:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 05:39:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 26445 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 05:39:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26356 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 05:38:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26346 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 05:38:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:38:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:38:51 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so3198758pzk.5 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Jcsk7OnYZzPQZLyK9hVBO/pFUVoSEBRtHc/sDHPHVYo=; b=SpdyjZr07iep0WBZ/QujZ9ZZDbdPg5p51eLUhVys6v63XSL5UQEy8xmIAqp53gVpDt sJJ0MJhTxRKIiLKk7GXIhhB9Xz7/iFQNtRsSmoodqn8tAocz0FZgLhxXSO3CuwvQiUkL 6G9wdfdZXSK0brd6015BLbiLjK36mwMxwMxFg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qV77TZW7LlwzWAQD0YVrDjAvEyRJ3bunVpdnaD/vL2Gcr2Ki/TpkE1rCsfC0phFEM8 pdBr7wWxUfFcMPggxWlwmBcMLGjrCJ5KafTAijIBGD6IbEjuHWGoldwg5v1hH2tN2SES ovrtwiG1U15MmwWCUa18zwRIWcoYQBAO33uHY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.66.21 with SMTP id o21mr359909wfa.47.1258868310029; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:38:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:38:30 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320911212138i3956dc19k5ce39ce399afec62@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e908a17037750478ef1e6b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e908a17037750478ef1e6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You can scp key-pair to ec2 machine Jeff Zhang On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's happening > behind the scene.) > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > message > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP address of > the slave. > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 instance to > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need the > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, but > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I am > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > Please help. Thanks. > --001636e908a17037750478ef1e6b-- From general-return-765-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 10:07:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61101 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 10:07:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 10:07:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 95494 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 10:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95405 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 10:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95395 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 10:07:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:07:05 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so3091985pwi.29 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pfoCzhZPNJ2+AG1CXwK055WrO4VkSRlVVPwW3U3L5IA=; b=ivZIdqn3pzuvycZb809flFXkWY2AiT3KmdCPEEl8wJt80UAGKrbVdR7asy/jphMv4q LSpM9pA/afDxZXF0CcuEWI2aYHTA4OjrZ1ueY8dHcNwoqOQxtXzbvx9txDClkl9mguTt 9PYTUWeMs5nEk6VvyU653CU7f1yjAeNTWGhUM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hN2buprf3oF2gaPqp5cgw2vdZ4p4H2DRRnvuXZMxRA+oiIF8P3hJTcoqe9ApUJGdAu nUFNWWR3XdYRQx5yM6W9+lNqhiYBNKhdsAqxCmisQyuRjCvF5BUaDy/SAS1itS1z04Bq mAGcqO9y27vC70jrze4BwFNdxH5dB0TWuyco0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.3 with SMTP id i3mr367643wfa.147.1258884404187; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:06:44 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320911220206k3f7c45d2k8b27c10e37e5b9c8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ad14b991f90478f2dd5a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502ad14b991f90478f2dd5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You can scp key-pair to ec2 machine Jeff Zhang On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's happening > behind the scene.) > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > message > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP address of > the slave. > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 instance to > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need the > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, but > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I am > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > Please help. Thanks. > --00504502ad14b991f90478f2dd5a-- From general-return-766-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 16:09:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18184 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 16:09:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 16:09:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 89472 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:09:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89386 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:09:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89376 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 16:09:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:09:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:09:40 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1104860ewy.29 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:09:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l3ccVqnhcboX/gW0n7IWuvUpdKuEohzVCxOkIVepJVY=; b=ZbOANPhyuowNfY6YnP8y91qxtXL+iAPZYpbGPXl/SS+dpJDQ/FACrhb6ol3rjdSLH5 xS+7ZXy2iaWKCOB4IW/jmPfpFREqyzXiHro/Y3nmMzLQQU22/JGOP770v/NCU0x1QEsn lJAg76wz+bSygZ7hkzti5cXXTNwRVGJlpTPEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=M+WKe/li7doc6VR85skg3+UbqRH6TzXokiXifNUkZYF1jGoBBRjX2J8ZntcZLXSXyD Erj8GArtSDI4X9w9a4QxvkBqUM7F/tGV565aOPGCD9hFIckJoZz/TL1jcX4qXG+Mn3fc HxlV4OuD9t2nXbMnDqVr/vyDKpaDUZFg27Ahg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.73 with SMTP id g51mr1252807wef.68.1258906158366; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:09:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:09:18 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d58cb260616d0478f7ee0d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d58cb260616d0478f7ee0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It does so by connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server (scp)". So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried to scp but getting "Permission denied (public key)". Any other ideas? Thanks. On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > Jeff Zhang > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's happening > > behind the scene.) > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > > message > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP address > of > > the slave. > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 instance > to > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need > the > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, but > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I am > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > --0016e6d58cb260616d0478f7ee0d-- From general-return-767-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 16:19:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19506 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 16:19:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 16:19:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 97660 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:19:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97575 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97565 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 16:19:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:19:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:19:35 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so3181360pwi.29 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:19:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fNU+xgrwGjK1TRLF5UyetrxoS12QZH8j5vrDZxandpQ=; b=XJ3n8Kkeb/Fa9Wq2pNdtZ8EKqUf6/94TbzGe+1xpuxmaGOdCYdDjSMgk83S30PF6W7 bNHEcY0HbVs+Zq3NiyJQlavddhl8Rwi5YqntRe8u3wHwxjt2LIRcr49B8fm/LVtGRTsZ SHzLXvUlwbBZySh13dK5D0q1PcI+eUtTz+svA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hm7RbLHlOtjRMl6CVEz/d8cWsiSxmcjbarbs5rYnlqQtWR4yg9Y2X6HpZIf4mn+IgG lPfX2YSBVo5k8pckd4bw9Y8vxzSExLyqaFnX8v3GQlSRI2ynTJGf60iDOA09cf+QwSt2 uIN3/rGHC0Z5OG5JB4Y4/eCd8kzvVwiik/cAE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.3 with SMTP id i3mr393057wfa.147.1258906754128; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:19:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:19:14 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ad14e29a890478f811c2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502ad14e29a890478f811c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way to login to ec2 Jeff Zhang On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It does so > by > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server (scp)". > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried to scp > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's distribution > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's > happening > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > > > message > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP > address > > of > > > the slave. > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 > instance > > to > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I need > > the > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, > but > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. I > am > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > --00504502ad14e29a890478f811c2-- From general-return-768-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 16:37:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22235 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 16:37:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 16:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 13634 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13560 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13550 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 16:37:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:37:09 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1119973ewy.29 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:36:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=b24i5osrV0RO+zS5FfrLBNLi/pq3z0dpvQp0Pl7kHMo=; b=npb6KOsdokML7pCBvsrITmdMlrxYEuImF9AAKbdOxtbwn2qq8pr1mKC6AApZXWYcHT 0x48dkwKKClzlVWHkHFWzFWfQEnSBIV6JdqK3UlymUq4SumUy/GStXwW4Y4YJpuMAcFP coMa7XKzbhBAYtSch6pyBV49RFQqxP4RO3AKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J8LmgdMlHwdJ0sH52XgjiIfEtt6GFWlAqRCbPhbLQw/RN1spBR7U0LsKKVL9NQHxc2 mjQ1N7un54nh5OV3GjgP/+LlBnj7lhq92HTW1AnF891SQlqGLR17aIvpWA2ENK5TPYLQ c8RAip/Q/IrsdTPOE2AYhXWyACdwr2Cy9j+mo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.9 with SMTP id x9mr1170865wee.0.1258907808102; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:36:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:36:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2996b4f9e20478f85074 --0016e6db2996b4f9e20478f85074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp firewall. As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at work to 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine to the ec2 instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 machine but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking into those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me know. Thanks once again for your help. On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way to login > to ec2 > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It does so > > by > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server (scp)". > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried to > scp > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > distribution > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's > > happening > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get a > > > > message > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP > > address > > > of > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 > > instance > > > to > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I > need > > > the > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local machine, > > but > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I agree.. > I > > am > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6db2996b4f9e20478f85074-- From general-return-769-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 16:42:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23597 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 16:42:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 16:42:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 27986 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27634 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 16:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27513 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 16:41:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:41:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.199.18.82] (HELO mail1.impetus.co.in) (203.199.18.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:41:46 +0000 Received: from mail1.impetus.co.in ([192.168.100.28]) by mail1.impetus.co.in ([192.168.100.28]) with mapi; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:21 +0530 From: Sanjay Sharma To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:14 +0530 Subject: RE: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Topic: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet Thread-Index: Acphzcv/uxYtGsd9Rv2nKtqHmoWfSwJwoEJQ Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here is the updated agenda for Hadoop India User Group meet up on 28th Nove= mber 2009 in Noida- - Introductions - Sessions- - "Enterprise perspective of Hadoop" - by Rajeev Gupta, IBM Researc= h Lab, IBM - "Apache Zookeeper" - by Aby Abraham, Yahoo! Bangalore - "Advanced Hadoop Tuning and Optimizations"- by Sanjay Sharma, Imp= etus - Establishing agenda for the next few meetings - Information exchange: tips, tricks, problems and open discussion, sharing= experiences on Hadoop and related technologies The registrations are still open at http://hug-india.eventbrite.com/ Regards, Sanjay Sharma Impetus t: +91-120-4363300 Extn 2761 m: +91-9958790163 -----Original Message----- From: Sanjay Sharma Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:50 AM To: 'general@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: 1st Hadoop India User Group meet We are planning to hold first Hadoop India user group meet up on 28th Novem= ber 2009 in Noida. We would be talking about our experiences with Apache Hadoop/Hbase/Hive/PIG= /Nutch/etc. The agenda would be: - Introductions - Sharing experiences on Hadoop and related technologies - Establishing agenda for the next few meetings - Information exchange: tips, tricks, problems and open discussion - Possible speaker TBD (invitations open!!) {we do have something to share= on "Hadoop for newbie" & "Hadoop Advanced Tuning"} My company (Impetus) would be providing the meeting room and we should be a= ble to accommodate around 40-60 friendly people. Coffee, Tea, and some snac= ks will be provided. Please join the linked-in Hadoop India User Group (http://www.linkedin.com/= groups?home=3D&gid=3D2258445&trk=3Danet_ug_hm) OR Yahoo group (http://tech.= groups.yahoo.com/group/hadoopind/) and confirm your attendance. Regards, Sanjay Sharma Follow our updates on www.twitter.com/impetuscalling. * Impetus Technologies is exhibiting it capabilities in Mobile and Wireless= in the GSMA Mobile Asia Congress, Hong Kong from November 16-18, 2009. Vis= it http://www.impetus.com/mlabs/GSMA_events.html for details. NOTE: This message may contain information that is confidential, proprietar= y, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The message is intended solely= for the named addressee. If received in error, please destroy and notify t= he sender. Any use of this email is prohibited when received in error. Impe= tus does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee, that the integrity of thi= s communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of e= rrors, virus, interception or interference. From general-return-770-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 22 19:45:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70342 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2009 19:45:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2009 19:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 90100 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 19:45:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90036 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2009 19:45:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90026 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2009 19:45:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:45:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:45:39 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so2086522fxm.11 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nI4i1K03RRWFzU5cIwxki8LrohtWcjEFd1z4Tuem99A=; b=x87Kzr19eS+7Dl8qnEfVy6oVJXJNDGlfb9dYzwIxkzkZ9bn+MHUNL8Ggmd2U2qBrxJ WV1NYbFCvQtZaORJt+a5MfA7/9zhfbiCbHM5RPlTT9u8J4gJxTDEELt5NIoN9TsVG6ZG /w2VMaA3LnWpWkvGiBsMJIQq8DseG/gS4QA+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sc7xFxLdLe/y95zj6EcS6v3DXL7lI9g3uuyaLjmbPy4JKwiTT5zcQTm/2qc7KZcoPF hCdw8cdde+/zsLmgLjbmo01ijinSF1j/AjZD/1XauEfGDdhlgFa48/5kLqC/QaAQBSbL xAoz3WwQKF8+EC552ErSE9kbtp4ig8IxZefbI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.84.2 with SMTP id m2mr1837826mul.107.1258919117635; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:45:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:45:17 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d00911221145g4b1ba10cx57888f06020c9ade@mail.gmail.com> Subject: WRITING DEBUGGING MESSAGES TO STANDARD OUTPUT IN HADOOP 0.20.1 From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6550dcecec26c0478faf25c --0016e6550dcecec26c0478faf25c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! I=B4m developing a Hadoop project using Cywin, Eclipse and VMW= are (running a Hadoop 0.20.1 distribution, similar to Cloudera=B4s one). The problem I=B4m facing now is that from inside Eclipse=B4s console I can see = all the messages launched by the jobtracker (i.e "09/11/22 20:28:02 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=3D200") and the System.out.println insert= ed in my code (like "***ENTERING PRIVATE FUNCTION****), but I can=B4t see any message if I insert -by example- a System.out.println("INSIDE MAP FUNCTION"). I also tried with context.setStatus("INSIDE MAP FUNCTION"), but I didn=B4t obtain any results. Is there any way to archive what I=B4m trying to do? Thanks in advance. --=20 Alberto --0016e6550dcecec26c0478faf25c-- From general-return-771-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 23 02:31:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90110 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 02:31:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 02:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 9754 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 02:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9600 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 02:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9589 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 02:31:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:31:01 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so3573746pzk.5 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:30:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2prB6eP8UwSl2zWdebNvlCUTP6p4rdqepV4/5sehoag=; b=RQuxQ+d6QuU+L6H9ODFHTouQ62C+ErORuBo3uyDVEoIcYOeDkfxzaIHrYhGa1qzNyv Tbd7CmdXHugNP5PuS58Lzm5Mncg/RlHqE39KFBo0T9EfMPh4KAYUhNVkCW5cJUjqU0QB pSY2ZogBya6T76SkMXSOAEmMTesQ39v7cPe+M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=smkIFWCo9Ijx/U0Mf1b8cOxEBGDxKCwQdS8hr2gCTcnxVedmG9pgriskkCKLuyDpDb SqlbeGtgbdT6bNyo4rLzLOZn9GNVOVMiTogi/SnmpQIZ3DGuVwMpiYLAUItWOHByY6Zh rgyH0MqIBg/gPe22zxuaDmDm2IRA9lJSEQIkw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.134.14 with SMTP id h14mr263968rvd.297.1258943440558; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:30:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <309f76d00911221145g4b1ba10cx57888f06020c9ade@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00911221145g4b1ba10cx57888f06020c9ade@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:30:40 -0800 Message-ID: <314098690911221830t459434dft5411dddb11e50725@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: WRITING DEBUGGING MESSAGES TO STANDARD OUTPUT IN HADOOP 0.20.1 From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1728c911b860479009c1e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1728c911b860479009c1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In general the stdout, stderr and syslog output for map and reduce tasks go into the logs/userlogs directory on the task tracker node that ran the task= . The log file data is available vai the jobtracker web interface if you clic= k through the per task information enough times. On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! I=B4m developing a Hadoop project using Cywin, Eclipse and > VMWare > (running a Hadoop 0.20.1 distribution, similar to Cloudera=B4s one). The > problem I=B4m facing now is that from inside Eclipse=B4s console I can se= e all > the messages launched by the jobtracker (i.e "09/11/22 20:28:02 INFO > mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=3D200") and the System.out.println inse= rted > in my code (like "***ENTERING PRIVATE FUNCTION****), but I can=B4t see an= y > message if I insert -by example- a System.out.println("INSIDE MAP > FUNCTION"). I also tried with context.setStatus("INSIDE MAP FUNCTION"), b= ut > I didn=B4t obtain any results. > Is there any way to archive what I=B4m trying to do? > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Alberto > --=20 Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --000e0cd1728c911b860479009c1e-- From general-return-772-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 23 11:15:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5558 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 11:15:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 11:15:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 72018 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 11:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71924 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 11:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71913 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 11:15:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:15:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:15:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEE0B7EA5 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:14:54 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aWHD6HM24Taq for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:14:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA57B7E7F for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:14:47 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1259579677.33733@87lmY9v4rj7eawtAGTzlZw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nANBEac2017511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:14:37 GMT Message-ID: <4B0A6E9C.7060108@apache.org> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:14:36 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nANBEac2017511 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Something Something wrote: > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It does so by > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server (scp)". > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried to scp > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > when you create a VM on EC2 you give it the public key you want to SCP/SSH in on. From general-return-773-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 23 16:11:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14935 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 16:11:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 16:11:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 45447 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 16:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45382 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 16:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45371 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 16:11:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:11:27 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so3918806pxi.2 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:11:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SAdz9Z12rJIlXS/xznp9kNT0sNLEbpPl5qKxQqM9M2E=; b=e8tQtDoRgKnFY+UAcQCjQIl6BlpN1FXbR/T/7WkiB540qCTOInBJy2PNGsmZ2u8p3x Zr4J7VIInTUQA+0lDBb4T/8CMIkMqM9j3XZBEcHPLqH7p81dLJFO1Yj6hkEb2yqXbA2f aJ/+fCA96sO9Y07ZMO0Z86/h80P2+j/xJw2/Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dJyCuKR7MFBxd8R2jlEe4enocvjhrXfD5t11hcRsEmzRqBORXKAzRCWrMozjXj73am ry9LFj6SY7A+OA1WFXaSfm1vk/ugx+lRSNplyFGrhJNdMD5Nei8Krf9/IoWgHK1HPGSl 7P2gUImcpGPQvhh2Hw118gk8SpvLjDN2oOL9k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.250.10 with SMTP id x10mr9236472wah.196.1258992659901; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:10:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:10:59 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367f929844afab04790c1261 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367f929844afab04790c1261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need to use scp -i and give it the path of your keypair. scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need to make a security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to hadoop. You can read more about security groups here - http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to master without specifying password. Regards, Vaibhav Puranik GumGum On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp firewall. > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at work to > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine to the > ec2 > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 machine > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking into > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me know. > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way to > login > > to ec2 > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It does > so > > > by > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server > (scp)". > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried to > > scp > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > > distribution > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's > > > happening > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I get > a > > > > > message > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP > > > address > > > > of > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 > > > instance > > > > to > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think I > > need > > > > the > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local > machine, > > > but > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I > agree.. > > I > > > am > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016367f929844afab04790c1261-- From general-return-774-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 23 22:10:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64968 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 22:10:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 22:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 86850 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 22:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86771 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 22:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86761 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 22:10:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:10:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of psdc1978@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:10:39 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2335268fga.11 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:10:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YlzLf5ppk/YmRpmSW5ieu4QWFTeAsVN4bMXu8LAR4ao=; b=XzwV1Vo40G380pVDdiFo6L1FcTUBDyzmsujzRISzHK807iHlxO0OYZLvIChT4DdNCr DfiDNPkXkUISX/yD04Yg+pUhO7/bSMx/S9b204rNmng/sfDCh5aQSJbMoy4BjJk0C9S1 UpHTn5uIIDLVduPV9g6KWnnsqS+NqXsy8wIcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YSZOVWO7xOmy+wmO8KevOxxu1+AkFEFEAm0tJRjbPioBi4hFfj+NCZjSHFjOvJTLdK Ms524i+4EN7QxPr6Dk67iVwxGigAdqfzS3n9Zvhx93YejSZFfhSdrUgIEcI9Okie6OIs ztxTRel8KizoHiYL9V5wXT6t6vupgkHF/fES0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.130.160 with SMTP id 32mr535895hbj.58.1259014216903; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:10:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:10:16 +0000 Message-ID: <61fec3fc0911231410y23a02102xf52f7bed2f2afa1e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: How compile hadoop-0.20.1 From: psdc1978 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f78c422a6e79047911178b --001485f78c422a6e79047911178b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, 1 - I'm trying to compile hadoop-0.20.1 but I'm facing several errors. Hadoop includes several subprojects, but these subprojects are all compiled in one file called hadoop-0.20.1-core.jar. If I just want to update the code in the MapReduce component, do I have to compile all the project? 2 - Why Hadoop only have one jar for all the project? For example, MapReduce subcomponent could be inside mapreduce.jar, Common subcomponent could be inside common.jar, HDFS subcomponent could be inside hdfs.jar, etc. 3 - Is there any tutorial that helps how to compile Hadoop? 4 - Should I try to compile hadoop in windows with Cygwin, or should I compile inside Ubuntu? Thanks, -- Pedro --001485f78c422a6e79047911178b-- From general-return-775-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 23 23:46:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95535 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2009 23:46:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2009 23:46:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 10464 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 23:46:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10379 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2009 23:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10369 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2009 23:46:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.39] (HELO web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:46:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 23378 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2009 23:46:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1259019960; bh=XgvPyWXksNrXV+zgxWv9taB+BfA6iHOq2lhigN8pYeU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=X1eSxLy8ThkEYCNjwYtEgWMY0lhSQ53EOxP/SMJlDvKovFEpdaPO2WYqlhXuhgJgRn0Cxo+bbkcvAmZ2l/RiEbINSul3aY3isicU3rzMWdAXZ19ekQQT/qcUohGviKtTmSOVbXaHRmBVfm2uCDBQuLlf3Y7wT2z6piO73ruc1bQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2LisUGCucoigqblj5T6SXZ4aPUj5AOAV2/OwGu2iMQbzauZdfmYfLWbNT3b7Wrk3+o7vhCh3ZqQFqCb5lu6BwuHZJlkrYrHmj7Ho3egGNPeanWEY5IcKmIB4AzolrOJexmBdtJZoeu080haBj18syGtw/V9as/WXfSasg0+BA+I=; Message-ID: <38943.23289.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: TVmsMr8VM1korGUJUipoJIO46_NvrnwF1hsZ11OYkO._kL0uZ9di96pKWhWAwxfYoid_HiudBH5dP6N1RoK._L0dE3bEjbuOk_vTvuFRWrfGtA9DOuzI0J.9QPYqp2lSx50kN0SjXbiS.ZNoppF23y_XoQH4NKCddnfaznKmo7TCFFR90baerODcWHRf9C6JPEWQC8ZCiLxIjggjcXw74el.9zIXv5RmBQAkYArTqzlW5TT8ICJmTAKOpFhBrmFxwCeW5PvUxX.XzLmZG.vdK_0O2Lmnv1zodl5VNtBPM8kYoK20fIqE_Npeb1gJcsmNDDBIVhfCkpuLi2ju0cw0.Q-- Received: from [129.170.212.188] by web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:46:00 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/211.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:46:00 -0800 (PST) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Size of BytesWritable To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, I am writing binary files using SequenceFile.Writer and what I am seeing is that the resulting file is much greater than what it should be. Here's my calculation, if someone can point out what is wrong in this it would be great: A Sequence File should have its own header : some constant bytes. Every BytesWritable written to the sequence file should be : number of bytes in the byte array for the BytesWritable plus an object header (probably 4 bytes for the header). The total size of the file should be the sum of the above two. Is this fine ? Thanks Himanshu Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-776-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 10:33:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48516 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 10:33:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 10:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 50957 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 10:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50870 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 10:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50860 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 10:33:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:33:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:33:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8CCB7CF0 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:49 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0Ziv8fs0t9Fy for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEFCB7F28 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:41 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1259663551.8537@M1xOBSXSe6Nu3gvSI/cmXA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nAOAWUKi020510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:30 GMT Message-ID: <4B0BB63E.4070306@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:30 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: How compile hadoop-0.20.1 References: <61fec3fc0911231410y23a02102xf52f7bed2f2afa1e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <61fec3fc0911231410y23a02102xf52f7bed2f2afa1e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: nAOAWUKi020510 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org psdc1978 wrote: > Hi all, > > 1 - I'm trying to compile hadoop-0.20.1 but I'm facing several errors. > Hadoop includes several subprojects, but these subprojects are all compiled > in one file called hadoop-0.20.1-core.jar. If I just want to update the code > in the MapReduce component, do I have to compile all the project? yes > > 2 - Why Hadoop only have one jar for all the project? For example, MapReduce > subcomponent could be inside mapreduce.jar, Common subcomponent could be > inside common.jar, HDFS subcomponent could be inside hdfs.jar, etc. in SVN_HEAD Hadoop it is split up. That will give you a version synchronisation problem that didn't exist before, of course > 3 - Is there any tutorial that helps how to compile Hadoop? Check out SVN, run "ant -p" to list the targets > > 4 - Should I try to compile hadoop in windows with Cygwin, or should I > compile inside Ubuntu? If you have linux, I would go for that. It does build under cygwin, and on OS/X, but there's a lot to be said for working in Linux on your desktop so that the problems you encounter are the same as you'd see in the cluster From general-return-777-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 14:24:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49850 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 14:24:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 14:24:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 60075 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 14:24:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59529 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 14:24:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59410 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 14:24:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:24:14 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tce.edu) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NCwJ3-0003gj-J0 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:53:52 +0530 Received: from 59.96.24.33 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tce.edu with HTTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:53:49 +0530 Message-ID: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:53:49 +0530 Subject: Doubts Regarding Capacity Scheduler's Function From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi, I have installed hadoop and configured capacity scheduler with three queues and run three jobs simultaneously,but i found that the jobs are scheduled only to the default queue and the jobs were not scheduled to the other queues configured by me.Is there any more configuration to be done for scheduling of jobs to the user defined queues? I have a basic doubt, whether Capacity scheduler schedules the job as a whole(say wordcount) or schedules the tasks(maps and reduces of the job) to the available nodes in the cluster. It would be very helpful if someone helps me to clearly understand the working of the capacity scheduler. Thanks in Advance. Regards, Abhilaash. -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-778-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 16:24:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98452 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 16:24:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 16:24:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 78035 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 16:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77948 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 16:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77936 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 16:24:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:24:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c154.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.154]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nAOGNo6l011197 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:x-priority:date:references:x-mailer; b=UY1vlsZumJjdOhB+b8REtPoRsNVAWrz9brg2bV+U9dkRzpgDYjwzQqebx/uzKU61 Message-Id: <9FD0B40E-F7BA-4CFC-9BE9-3D52758E4EC8@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-156--547727165 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Doubts Regarding Capacity Scheduler's Function X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:23:50 -0800 References: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-156--547727165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Abhilaash wrote: > I have installed hadoop and configured capacity scheduler with > three queues and run three jobs simultaneously,but i found that > the jobs are scheduled only to the default queue and the jobs were > not scheduled to the other queues configured by me.Is there any > more configuration to be done for scheduling of jobs to the user > defined queues? Each job needs to have the mapred.job.queue.name set to the right queue for the CS. It defaults to "default" queue. > I have a basic doubt, whether Capacity scheduler schedules > the job > as a whole(say wordcount) or schedules the tasks(maps and reduces > of the job) to the available nodes in the cluster. Every Map-Reduce scheduler: DefaultScheduler, CapacityScheduler, FairScheduler, schedules one task at a time. > It would be very helpful if someone helps me to clearly > understand > the working of the capacity scheduler. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/capacity_scheduler.html - hope this helps. Arun --Apple-Mail-156--547727165-- From general-return-779-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 18:54:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69920 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 18:54:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 18:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2557 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 18:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2470 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 18:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2460 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 18:54:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:54:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.217] (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:54:52 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so855554ewy.11 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:54:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z/kk8HatPF7H34inWRZ995DzrKnn3mewHycieXr1bmI=; b=DVhEaEMfNs7E3sM8ZT3mSkRMQ9/vCJxePfsvCEKhZN7dMxuxbDv3uwqXcD9MiYTvcO j5XLkzF9qTTZ/fjQxDthaPswiOCCygdQJZ2CN47QfEHTNLt+2qFFEDIYzfYVZw7cs04W zfEIjJdkJ+c8G66ub2gRzMVx95ZO318RojFSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JVvxGXuoRWr8dFSVDQT9oqe/RaCRDBeXLe2RdjYmQWiA8oNu8roXC+6GKrVnguMsmI RtXJW/tVnSNUpaQ5EMttB0MypUuSXUXNyWcZSivIg/VeH6wJfwLI/hgqosnAKvWFNmtT v41VDKQkif/vXunCR+bcb+yJV8AfFA+ZfDLL8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.133 with SMTP id y5mr2130418wee.139.1259088870311; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:54:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:54:30 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a2c7db061904792278a0 --0016e6d9a2c7db061904792278a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local machine after I opened port 22 under my security group. But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my Master when I run: ./start-all.sh I get messages saying... 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: ssh -i .pem Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote: > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need to use > scp > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need to make > a > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to hadoop. > > You can read more about security groups here - > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to master > without specifying password. > > Regards, > Vaibhav Puranik > GumGum > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp > firewall. > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at work > to > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine to the > > ec2 > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 > machine > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking into > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me know. > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way to > > login > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It > does > > so > > > > by > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I tried > to > > > scp > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang > wrote: > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > > > distribution > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's > > > > happening > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I > get > > a > > > > > > message > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is IP > > > > address > > > > > of > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 > > > > instance > > > > > to > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I think > I > > > need > > > > > the > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local > > machine, > > > > but > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I > > agree.. > > > I > > > > am > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d9a2c7db061904792278a0-- From general-return-780-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 19:00:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71534 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 19:00:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 19:00:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 13676 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:00:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13596 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:00:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13586 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 19:00:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:36 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nAOIwq3P065292 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:58:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=qJrWdpmAO5dwnZEH47tkFE5wvxc+1vtsVI/AjOpzyUrd9TC1gtvCQORrUEYM+KyY Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Hadoop Team Openings at Yahoo! Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:58:52 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks, where' looking for a number of great software engineers, quality engineers, performance engineers, and managers to join the Sunnyvale, USA and Bangalore, India Hadoop Teams at Yahoo! Please spread the word. Job descriptions and details on how to apply are here: US: http://tinyurl.com/hadoop-jobs India: http://tinyurl.com/hadoop-india-jobs Cheers, Nigel From general-return-781-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 19:17:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76587 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 19:17:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 19:17:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 42593 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42514 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:17:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42504 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 19:17:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:17:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:17:17 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so4711780pwi.29 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:16:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KY6JkzQwk+gxV+P7D/utaOhTNKpUUS1j2qbNKryUo1g=; b=sQQfiM3pu3gHqhJwb7UOuETNnVydsPrJckVYeS4QnUx73/rRbjrSdEYYiCcj+6/RXY e4cbnH0sgbem/aWE8gdt7ULgfh5LPTqWQmlcSj2X0Zy+JxUDx6PCVuAzVQC/bBMflT1a bLB/vOXIuj4MOENV2uF3X2pjzFPs+IhX61CTw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=EeDMKm9k1YnfwmyNeSqac6L1lWwCjBCr5Wx/ElQ7RQftFZV2b2pf8PdY2B7TbxvELA WHuGqwpvNENKanyNycpzQI6PbHRaPFOT0g2ToKZwseLsOU0EkxkJac/Q3mRCg/2Gb7A3 GQ11QSz8jsWZYFsl4z9l7f8Na7O4AG+lOGbc0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.112.5 with SMTP id p5mr12805998wam.223.1259090217618; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:16:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:16:57 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649bc5e294f0b047922c900 --0016e649bc5e294f0b047922c900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a slave to master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using to your auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. Furthrmore, after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it asks you the following message - say yes: The authenticity of host 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' can't be established. RSA key fingerprint is 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' (RSA) to the list of known hosts. In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are trying to ssh is in your known_hosts file. Regards, Vaibhav On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local machine > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my Master > when I run: > > ./start-all.sh > > I get messages saying... > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > ssh -i .pem > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > wrote: > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need to use > > scp > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need to > make > > a > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to hadoop. > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to master > > without specifying password. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav Puranik > > GumGum > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp > > firewall. > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at > work > > to > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine to > the > > > ec2 > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 > > machine > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking into > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me > know. > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way to > > > login > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It > > does > > > so > > > > > by > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I > tried > > to > > > > scp > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > > > > distribution > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn what's > > > > > happening > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, I > > get > > > a > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is > IP > > > > > address > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master EC2 > > > > > instance > > > > > > to > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I > think > > I > > > > need > > > > > > the > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local > > > machine, > > > > > but > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I > > > agree.. > > > > I > > > > > am > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e649bc5e294f0b047922c900-- From general-return-782-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 19:36:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82786 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 19:36:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 19:36:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 75305 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75216 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 19:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75206 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 19:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:36:19 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tce.edu) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ND1B3-0006To-Be for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:05:56 +0530 Received: from 59.96.24.33 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tce.edu with HTTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:05:53 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9FD0B40E-F7BA-4CFC-9BE9-3D52758E4EC8@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> <9FD0B40E-F7BA-4CFC-9BE9-3D52758E4EC8@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:05:53 +0530 Subject: Re: Doubts Regarding Capacity Scheduler's Function From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi, >> defined queues? > > Each job needs to have the mapred.job.queue.name set to the right > queue for the CS. It defaults to "default" queue. > I have set that property to a user defined queue Queue1 and now my submitted jobs are scheduled to Queue1,but I want to know the configuration example to schedule job1 to default ,then job2 to Queue2,etc., whether this can be done? > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/capacity_scheduler.html - > hope this helps. Thanks,it helped me a lot. Regards, Abhilaash. -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-783-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 21:38:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22590 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 21:38:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 21:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 82654 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 21:38:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82556 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 21:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82546 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 21:38:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:38:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:38:47 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so4141392fxm.11 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pIkFXzbhwq3Adgw0YVYyenXakBSXU3DRlshjJZUNyGE=; b=dzVPJMG7VhG9tyVvq+YDWb9XddA+YuG1Dlj+yQpL1I4rfFWQf2iWR7CsAs6ZL61ZrA TECBkZXTc+pG6L2H+RktCSkrFQJ8CqEMdI19KRar1Xy8QOLJtqRO+rDLlMVFRdJjJxEJ BNIWBA8yfueS5tEDj7mxbAMVsWD1EWu7Hkh44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=v7qTkQZkykA5PmE2xF4Vx0flfwtraINhyA4KuUaurWgApvx/WKz3hg+EvMN5UYD6Xk ShvESFCR8zo1Hbk7OkIP36k/7V9YJJmKOwBKcXYC//6EORy+fBjZMRNRWq4jZvW7/E1/ zzJazg58an2yGZmyOCa523m9ZrE4UdPaXXNwU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.82 with SMTP id g60mr2156872wef.98.1259098704224; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:38:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:38:24 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7858e00a10b047924c37f --0016e6d7858e00a10b047924c37f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using to your auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." I tried this.... cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission denied (publickey). Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. Thanks for your patience. It's greatly appreciated. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote: > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a slave to > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using to your > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. Furthrmore, > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it asks you > the following message - say yes: > > The authenticity of host > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' can't > be established. > RSA key fingerprint is 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > Warning: Permanently added > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are trying to > ssh > is in your known_hosts file. > > Regards, > Vaibhav > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local > machine > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my Master > > when I run: > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > wrote: > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need to > use > > > scp > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need to > > make > > > a > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to hadoop. > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to > master > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > GumGum > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp > > > firewall. > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at > > work > > > to > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine to > > the > > > > ec2 > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 > > > machine > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking > into > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me > > know. > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang > wrote: > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way > to > > > > login > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) "It > > > does > > > > so > > > > > > by > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP server > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I > > tried > > > to > > > > > scp > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn > what's > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the master, > I > > > get > > > > a > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx is > > IP > > > > > > address > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master > EC2 > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I > > think > > > I > > > > > need > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my local > > > > machine, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, I > > > > agree.. > > > > > I > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d7858e00a10b047924c37f-- From general-return-784-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 21:44:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25065 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 21:44:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 21:44:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 96267 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 21:44:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96173 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 21:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96163 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 21:44:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:44:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:44:32 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so4806912pwi.29 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:44:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JDTjYXJhl2gBqjLjhMXxipSNMs9WohilB5f3Px6QPQs=; b=dG6vy3g4yPeSoJPlt7Ng4cwsVIiJqq2RVNvCGrt2B4U7CiHhwc0eErVZqO8EJFPHAC APQWiS5OA03HvztRqmSKjbH9PGyhzAozAKbMAe2ZjiSU6CCPq7Q5hgKMW8ZmEZfA6n+M ZWQ2JcJLUctFARMvbdYjuKC+yrW35cwFL48wc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UfgdRoLl/HiBGy7seeuxgpOJgJhzfIs1Dh3zzCd8f3m5TVTtFVube1T+/kI/8Bb1hH JtuDtz3/Fe+D53ndEIjxxMosJcfR6smRSDwSMprzMXnDABo/XyLuHD+OE5uRfE+3cxAt M/uCElhQ1TAKb+mZsDVJKDpQoWNmfZ5qp5mnQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.214.22 with SMTP id m22mr13276236wag.218.1259099050829; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:44:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:44:10 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64aee68a966d4047924d7b9 --0016e64aee68a966d4047924d7b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, I pretty much meant that. Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. Regards, Vaibhav On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that you need > to add the keypair you are using to your > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > I tried this.... > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission denied > (publickey). > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. Thanks for > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik >wrote: > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a slave to > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using to > your > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. Furthrmore, > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it asks > you > > the following message - say yes: > > > > The authenticity of host > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' can't > > be established. > > RSA key fingerprint is 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > Warning: Permanently added > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are trying to > > ssh > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local > > machine > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my > Master > > > when I run: > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need to > > use > > > > scp > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need to > > > make > > > > a > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to > hadoop. > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to > > master > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp > > > > firewall. > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine at > > > work > > > > to > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine > to > > > the > > > > > ec2 > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the ec2 > > > > machine > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am looking > > into > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let me > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no way > > to > > > > > login > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) > "It > > > > does > > > > > so > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP > server > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case I > > > tried > > > > to > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, Cloudera's > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn > > what's > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the > master, > > I > > > > get > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where 10.xxx > is > > > IP > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the master > > EC2 > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? I > > > think > > > > I > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my > local > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I know, > I > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e64aee68a966d4047924d7b9-- From general-return-785-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 22:07:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32434 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 22:07:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 22:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31784 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 22:07:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31703 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 22:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31693 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 22:07:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:07:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.217] (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:07:21 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1072403ewy.11 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:06:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HzlV3Cjj434bhw5hYB/+gDVXVbotu78M4g1iwPyMhqk=; b=vaf6cgSOjsEnARjRNi0/aD71JTH5f6Z4TR9SYvsZvLxDstAwZ1lUwTp/Xyf2I0MrSe 3zeCBYhsa5ZxkhS5pLW7DCmGX62JIt3yDpEt6JGif/MH+hzedXt7Uc1EU0O6NZoZE/+n vhIEcJPaGhXEfXitVR5Yfe9tpMGb8xITIsBXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oyWoz+VEsrmaX77rV6lo4eTIH+FIKPVLvOpxHbteKewagbmd0GlX9udsstGcayW+KH XpcHk+nHx4D8wdGFovhpagdvLFrspLKpmchY/CK04UJOwAkl8xFaFZX0OPcRGPJgF5Ar BXbzZYE2cCP5dvGVqgC5pguZfSbCDsqzRcD0E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.13 with SMTP id d13mr2225499wef.130.1259100418187; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:06:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911211812q64a7fb85jcdcda10be650d4ef@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:06:58 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7dff529a0c50479252953 --0016e6d7dff529a0c50479252953 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages from ./all-start.sh I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. Question: On the slave, when I do: ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for Datanode and the other for TaskTracker? Please let me know. Thanks again. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote: > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > Regards, > Vaibhav > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that you > need > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission denied > > (publickey). > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. Thanks > for > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > >wrote: > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a slave > to > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using to > > your > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. Furthrmore, > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it asks > > you > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' can't > > > be established. > > > RSA key fingerprint is 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are trying > to > > > ssh > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local > > > machine > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my > > Master > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need > to > > > use > > > > > scp > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you need > to > > > > make > > > > > a > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves to > > > master > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a corp > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local machine > at > > > > work > > > > > to > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my machine > > to > > > > the > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the > ec2 > > > > > machine > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am > looking > > > into > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let > me > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no > way > > > to > > > > > > login > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy) > > "It > > > > > does > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP > > server > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any case > I > > > > tried > > > > > to > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, > Cloudera's > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn > > > what's > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the > > master, > > > I > > > > > get > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where > 10.xxx > > is > > > > IP > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the > master > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? > I > > > > think > > > > > I > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my > > local > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I > know, > > I > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d7dff529a0c50479252953-- From general-return-786-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 24 22:59:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49109 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2009 22:59:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 22:59:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 5094 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 22:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5010 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2009 22:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4996 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2009 22:59:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:59:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:58:59 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so459096pzk.5 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:58:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IC6rt/R4Ju/knc3aRbEhsaTzmbLkZVHigpnaS2mxzns=; b=qSptq+SNuvJVbWS9CS+bUew6BsQQL145p+sim1RVIBtn4eqswCtU437sIkTWPy1hKF UQns5HdTjQ11Ej46dTTw8rmgCaeNX6xqI+6DJLxPngxlVUhs/k+MKDCO2TDSfAgsVIVb Y273h6xZn7kj+UsrHAIENqcyvdHDwz7nyVjho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tg1/WKPVWYsY3JqeY9fzzZs2BMLLNu5oENLaKaRUr6w8/5vTx9l2B2rGDT2Oy15mjQ FJgeGJZafiGkeu9AZUwLfTXoyG/EvMsihYnUe+GAXqOpWGsKgLt9PYFHZ5ZhQTVBtOvZ ojOe9tjYF5EWn1SuMHOxOKGuo22b67e30PT6E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.119.6 with SMTP id r6mr13669894wac.45.1259103517598; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:58:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220809l2b923866u4c79e4a37e2d9ad4@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:58:37 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369208c4e6e5f6047925e139 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016369208c4e6e5f6047925e139 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Install a program called Jps. It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the processes (if they are running). Also make sure you check your logs. Regards, Vaibhav On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages from > ./all-start.sh > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for Datanode > and the other for TaskTracker? > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > wrote: > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that you > > need > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission denied > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. Thanks > > for > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > >wrote: > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a > slave > > to > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using > to > > > your > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. > Furthrmore, > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it > asks > > > you > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' can't > > > > be established. > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are trying > > to > > > > ssh > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my local > > > > machine > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on my > > > Master > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you need > > to > > > > use > > > > > > scp > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you > need > > to > > > > > make > > > > > > a > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves > to > > > > master > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a > corp > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local > machine > > at > > > > > work > > > > > > to > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my > machine > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to the > > ec2 > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am > > looking > > > > into > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please let > > me > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have no > > way > > > > to > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > ) > > > "It > > > > > > does > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an SCP > > > server > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any > case > > I > > > > > tried > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can learn > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the > > > master, > > > > I > > > > > > get > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where > > 10.xxx > > > is > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the > > master > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix it? > > I > > > > > think > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on my > > > local > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I > > know, > > > I > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016369208c4e6e5f6047925e139-- From general-return-787-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 00:11:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69351 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 00:11:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 00:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 85797 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 00:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85769 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 00:11:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85753 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 00:11:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:11:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:11:45 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-246-217.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-217.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.217]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nAP0ABiS056742; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:10:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:x-priority:references: message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=AHyDs0/TxbYRG1U0DrwHJo73NmZgiqxAdRPwAt8Xw2TIrv0Y0AZindm/kdBYHIAc From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Doubts Regarding Capacity Scheduler's Function X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> <9FD0B40E-F7BA-4CFC-9BE9-3D52758E4EC8@yahoo-inc.com> Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:10:11 -0800 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) (moving to mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org) > I have set that property to a user defined queue Queue1 and now my > submitted jobs are scheduled to Queue1,but I want to know the > configuration example to schedule job1 to default ,then job2 to > Queue2,etc., Use one of the several ways to pass the queue name as a config variable: JobConf j = new JobConf(); j.setQueueName("myqueue"); or cmd line: hadoop jar myjob.jar -Dmapred.job.queue.name=myqueue Arun From general-return-788-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 15:13:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10738 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 15:13:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 15:13:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 61832 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 15:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61224 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 15:13:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61124 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 15:13:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:13:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhilaash_cse@tce.edu designates 210.212.252.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [210.212.252.72] (HELO tce.edu) (210.212.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:13:41 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mail.tce.edu) by tce.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NDJYA-00074a-9L for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:42:58 +0530 Received: from 59.92.122.90 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abhilaash_cse) by mail.tce.edu with HTTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:42:58 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <6efd398094dc482ed37a662080836354.squirrel@mail.tce.edu> <9FD0B40E-F7BA-4CFC-9BE9-3D52758E4EC8@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:42:58 +0530 Subject: Re: Doubts Regarding Capacity Scheduler's Function From: "Abhilaash" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-XheaderVersion: 1.1 X-UserAgent: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No Hi, > JobConf j = new JobConf(); > > j.setQueueName("myqueue"); > > or cmd line: > hadoop jar myjob.jar -Dmapred.job.queue.name=myqueue > > Arun > Thanks,It works now. Regards, Abhilaash. -- Nothing is impossible because impossible says i'm possible... ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using TCEMail Service. Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai-625 015, India From general-return-789-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 16:38:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39454 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 16:38:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 16:38:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 40058 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 16:38:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39962 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 16:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39952 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 16:38:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:38:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.153] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:38:33 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so66952fgb.11 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:38:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OUGYz/Ly4ELjr2x6dREUUWPkl9q1WCCmV2b1L1qbctg=; b=tJYWLRpxIA1ps8Rma1tDkrJi/0+DrchvLnhS+I1IPgrQpOyBjkRKbUGP2n6SCFH4vj OD/9g8gpsDH7uknHvCdBuCj2frQnWMLzPbrCTHDR1wEsdvARRYkQs9AinpDiGAbcsOOW oeBHW+3Yn429fRG9N/wDtjWL3NyWITvlCX/KI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J6PvSydfv7ri2GxLxIp92lx6liRRF9D31ZBnG3vKenpeL/LeK+eZXz5GJfb/uemIIh o55sgpzv9UIANzXyIjuBB5lgmD6lr6BuqoLVltgDABqDFB/APUBiuTYUX5Rd8upViq25 a1Ww4FJXpqtehmlA7Z+stJPmxWU4x/ReatqII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.129 with SMTP id w1mr2538383wee.145.1259167090999; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:38:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320911220819j8d33c10te498c18362e825e0@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:38:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d785452c0369047934af77 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d785452c0369047934af77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Me again :( I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but now I can't even go further than I did before :( Please let me know what step I am missing: 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for Slave. 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') This is my "Master" window. 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') This is my "Slave" window. 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my local machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slave: ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got Permission denied (public key) ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering KeyPair), copied the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' file to Master's 'authoried_key' file. Now, every time I try (from Master): ssh I get - "Permission denied (publickey). But, when I type: ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem It works. I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doing wrong? I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able to 'ssh' to slave without using key pair, correct? Thanks for your help. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote: > Install a program called Jps. > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the processes (if > they are running). > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > Regards, > Vaibhav > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages from > > ./all-start.sh > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for > Datanode > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that > you > > > need > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission > denied > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. > Thanks > > > for > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a > > slave > > > to > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are using > > to > > > > your > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. > > Furthrmore, > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it > > asks > > > > you > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' > can't > > > > > be established. > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are > trying > > > to > > > > > ssh > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my > local > > > > > machine > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on > my > > > > Master > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you > need > > > to > > > > > use > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you > > need > > > to > > > > > > make > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access to > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the slaves > > to > > > > > master > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a > > corp > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local > > machine > > > at > > > > > > work > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my > > machine > > > > to > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to > the > > > ec2 > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am > > > looking > > > > > into > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please > let > > > me > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you have > no > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > ) > > > > "It > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an > SCP > > > > server > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any > > case > > > I > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can > learn > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on the > > > > master, > > > > > I > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where > > > 10.xxx > > > > is > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from the > > > master > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix > it? > > > I > > > > > > think > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on > my > > > > local > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, I > > > know, > > > > I > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d785452c0369047934af77-- From general-return-790-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 17:22:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55709 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 17:22:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 17:22:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 34553 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 17:22:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34455 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 17:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34445 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 17:22:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:22:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:21:57 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so5061747pxi.5 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:21:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZlzbZ7jTtw9QaQMc7t5S0W1VKrLY0TSAaUtL6npYbGc=; b=ddFRyC6cowVVSKjQ2WHn5K/IEaWswioUVi2Vk3pKqweOC3aebqe5BmMe3Gge1m/QRm 9E0tGr7GM9WTdDmp76NFWWvKAwfKZyv3OW0jWjOroI1oDd0DWwKBX1GUp2efIpOWI5H/ xtGAHV3kb7EsRCWjvHvBH9alTCQ2wBWHW/uOw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uF6M6kd3urxFMsw6fj102wDiWvF0nY/djuzCSu4UcuTi2TpwbZtshQhUsOazbW0cO1 9kEXtvjqlWx6eT8/Vb0+JpjD428VkOw8qtqqHNpKrc5C5+bg1M15k16p7j6ujN60o8sC SbIAzLL2tfGWr2qUA9mQjkUFdZAn8SL38v6Y4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.100.30 with SMTP id c30mr2741496wam.211.1259169693804; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:21:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911220836t76895c04x6f7973d759c60c18@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:21:33 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64b90464fab830479354a5d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64b90464fab830479354a5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Actually I was wrong about adding keypair. It should be resolved by adding master's public key to slave's authorized_keys. Amazon puts your keypair in authroized_keys automatically. I missed that part. Regards, Vaibhav On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Me again :( > > I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but now I can't > even go further than I did before :( > > Please let me know what step I am missing: > > 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for Slave. > > 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > This is my "Master" window. > > 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > This is my "Slave" window. > > 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my local > machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' > > cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slave: > ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got Permission > denied (public key) > ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering KeyPair), copied > the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' file to > Master's 'authoried_key' file. > > Now, every time I try (from Master): > > ssh > > I get - "Permission denied (publickey). > > But, when I type: > > ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem > > It works. > > I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doing wrong? > I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able to 'ssh' > to slave without using key pair, correct? > > > Thanks for your help. > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > wrote: > > > Install a program called Jps. > > > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the processes > (if > > they are running). > > > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages from > > > ./all-start.sh > > > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for > > Datanode > > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve that > > you > > > > need > > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission > > denied > > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. > > Thanks > > > > for > > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair from a > > > slave > > > > to > > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are > using > > > to > > > > > your > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. > > > Furthrmore, > > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and if it > > > asks > > > > > you > > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)' > > can't > > > > > > be established. > > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you are > > trying > > > > to > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from my > > local > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean... on > > my > > > > > Master > > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance you > > need > > > > to > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, you > > > need > > > > to > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop access > to > > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature-of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the > slaves > > > to > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behind a > > > corp > > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my local > > > machine > > > > at > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from my > > > machine > > > > > to > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work) to > > the > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I am > > > > looking > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, please > > let > > > > me > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you > have > > no > > > > way > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > > ) > > > > > "It > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes an > > SCP > > > > > server > > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In any > > > case > > > > I > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something Something > < > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, > > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I can > > learn > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS on > the > > > > > master, > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - where > > > > 10.xxx > > > > > is > > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh from > the > > > > master > > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to fix > > it? > > > > I > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pair on > > my > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I know, > I > > > > know, > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e64b90464fab830479354a5d-- From general-return-791-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 17:45:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68064 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 17:45:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 17:45:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 96792 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 17:45:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96701 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 17:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96691 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 17:45:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:45:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.214] (HELO mail-ew0-f214.google.com) (209.85.219.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:45:53 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4660906ewy.29 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:45:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hDGLG3B6Dhb59H3PWcRFVtyFupF3YeMa70DKs5QxDsQ=; b=LsJ3DZ6hF2wsFW8jvMSr+GN9/eCBiyYKhMZzwssH+Hvlp4XsASH74wVzwMFA28hYku H9apfOP0XKlVUVf9ttPIxTM1eGX4VNn1lEIB09OLpNt7S/L+MM6tb5GIusnguqdADwZ/ SBR0yFB09PVy9b/HjfOklrsOlAbcRhBVYexl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NzhLakidQpjfZ32fKgGabhNFLbB3KOH5IoafjE+WGsHn2AuMpCJ4SE8doKrLVPnYUa kguzG0iUA43UWC+PwKWwKz1mmQj/5drsk1lMEF8dLKSxmKRzv9L9btDUiUNxBP+fPYlB 8+bQn71XZebjs6kk3zFfHEE/tYUKf2NWaGHAY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.85 with SMTP id b63mr2532129wef.175.1259171128560; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:45:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911230810l690624a1vd4fe8c208279293c@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:45:28 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911250945i49684a5am6510cc6ffb7f86c8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d97076d44cd50479359f93 --0016e6d97076d44cd50479359f93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can you please explain what you mean by "add master's public key to slave's authorized_keys"? I have a feeling I am not doing this correctly. What I did is this: 1) On Master, opened ~/.ssh/authorized_key and copied lines that look like this... ssh-dss AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAKJOife8p+6vjJ/jODSWaBgyawN7XWmasasasb0cVqhe1WOpnJQpXuJ= eqsaBaZYHYxj8P74m1rOIdN9lSPAz6gEjHo4ft8UM7ZVExRC6HDM7JdfdferhwRgQSVI9ruTLls= sO9i1D17mBnLotsgy92CyS7bsanM25nRqhmvqkX7tuKp66nlAAAAFQCnbwPn3v+ttorRZ4OijkA= KoJaVFQAAAIAGVyZGwkm5DwYvige0VYhXZns8qSvW15dwSrS1a6k41q3C91AQZylvJYDnBjNGnW= wUHfyWpyruzVCOskavEmsl6FcouU5Av1zLRT1sk4llUzZxXFtv6gzRBq2+aiCcoex3O+RRJbHa8= 9cMLy6jeZOCFahwVz6IyHcQ0b7gZjQgFQAAAIBA4vzSDy5oN27Ji3mF9ZklsSmlJJrrJxGJfOn6= /BK5tyvBijLy6tEJHrH3dY8TEJUp2V9RINKwcsy5LdqyI5gJRWoM8WdNzmUoIOLAW0HIVl2MldK= KqP/ctQwGI94EjykSUYVt/IAvUcjFuIrtiGrMDjsqfm7h1Gi2ZtDQ=3D=3D root@domU-12-31-38-00-39-C8 to the end of ~/.ssh/authorized_key on Slave. Something tells me there's a better way to do this. Is there? On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote= : > Actually I was wrong about adding keypair. It should be resolved by addin= g > master's public key to slave's authorized_keys. Amazon puts your keypair = in > authroized_keys automatically. I missed that part. > > Regards, > Vaibhav > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Me again :( > > > > I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but now I > can't > > even go further than I did before :( > > > > Please let me know what step I am missing: > > > > 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for Slave= . > > > > 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > This is my "Master" window. > > > > 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > This is my "Slave" window. > > > > 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my local > > machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' > > > > cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slave: > > ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got Permissio= n > > denied (public key) > > ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > > cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering KeyPair), > copied > > the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' file = to > > Master's 'authoried_key' file. > > > > Now, every time I try (from Master): > > > > ssh > > > > I get - "Permission denied (publickey). > > > > But, when I type: > > > > ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem > > > > It works. > > > > I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doing > wrong? > > I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able to > 'ssh' > > to slave without using key pair, correct? > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > wrote: > > > > > Install a program called Jps. > > > > > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the process= es > > (if > > > they are running). > > > > > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages from > > > > ./all-start.sh > > > > > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for > > > Datanode > > > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve > that > > > you > > > > > need > > > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys"? > > > > > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permission > > > denied > > > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues. > > > Thanks > > > > > for > > > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair fro= m > a > > > > slave > > > > > to > > > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you are > > using > > > > to > > > > > > your > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. > > > > Furthrmore, > > > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and i= f > it > > > > asks > > > > > > you > > > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com(147.127.186.243)= ' > > > can't > > > > > > > be established. > > > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com,147.127.186.243' > > > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you ar= e > > > trying > > > > > to > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp from = my > > > local > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I mean..= . > on > > > my > > > > > > Master > > > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instance > you > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoop, > you > > > > need > > > > > to > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop > access > > to > > > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature= -of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all the > > slaves > > > > to > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is behi= nd > a > > > > corp > > > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my loca= l > > > > machine > > > > > at > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file from = my > > > > machine > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at work= ) > to > > > the > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. I > am > > > > > looking > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, > please > > > let > > > > > me > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise you > > have > > > no > > > > > way > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Something = < > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > > > ) > > > > > > "It > > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there executes > an > > > SCP > > > > > > server > > > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. In > any > > > > case > > > > > I > > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something > Something > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Yes, > > > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I c= an > > > learn > > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS o= n > > the > > > > > > master, > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - > where > > > > > 10.xxx > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh fro= m > > the > > > > > master > > > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way to > fix > > > it? > > > > > I > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key pai= r > on > > > my > > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I > know, > > I > > > > > know, > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d97076d44cd50479359f93-- From general-return-792-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 25 18:25:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82479 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 18:25:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 18:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 93930 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 18:25:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93819 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 18:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93809 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 18:25:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:25:42 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so5104006pxi.5 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:25:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2BcNO2lEyDRDjrPRqJM8kLuHGhgjO3N8RSnLV+hbx+g=; b=qvrStNQmtyTFQl9BEukmJsxoE9V6z8fZSiWF7uaxJDWCTUkz03nI2Sl6lHpUjukRJV myGnXxc2yO6P0U2eWWgxadaxYOZqAekWDC1Q/5J3gLlNubORW0x9cMjcTOZcmgUR9eNe 1sG3EurYewrGpg8DzORjzs0e7EoD36FL8KSGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dxI+31Pbb0jIB+D5XkvnpQ0wZZzEixPFnBxpvH6G7LQdjOEGrKFvwF1q9r4jQRQgRd riIf79mAJYma31wlsyUr2QbObGRT2SvRp5wZfe/ClWRD35jnsT3bqfaDpUzYJRlYTt5Q q0/JZscwLEU0J4aMfgrgpTrbdi6djAu28F05M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.164.38 with SMTP id m38mr8275780wae.219.1259173518483; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:25:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911250945i49684a5am6510cc6ffb7f86c8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241054w6ef4852n41ddf93198c27acd@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250945i49684a5am6510cc6ffb7f86c8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:25:18 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911251025s73655a79ned5f6418caba81fb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367f934f47a03a0479362e2d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367f934f47a03a0479362e2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On master, in .ssh folder, there should be a file id_dsa.pub. This is master's public key. Contents of this file should be copied to slave's authorized_keys file. Regards, Vaibhav On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you please explain what you mean by "add master's public key to slave= 's > authorized_keys"? I have a feeling I am not doing this correctly. What = I > did is this: > > 1) On Master, opened ~/.ssh/authorized_key and copied lines that look li= ke > this... > > ssh-dss > > AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAKJOife8p+6vjJ/jODSWaBgyawN7XWmasasasb0cVqhe1WOpnJQpX= uJeqsaBaZYHYxj8P74m1rOIdN9lSPAz6gEjHo4ft8UM7ZVExRC6HDM7JdfdferhwRgQSVI9ruTL= lssO9i1D17mBnLotsgy92CyS7bsanM25nRqhmvqkX7tuKp66nlAAAAFQCnbwPn3v+ttorRZ4Oij= kAKoJaVFQAAAIAGVyZGwkm5DwYvige0VYhXZns8qSvW15dwSrS1a6k41q3C91AQZylvJYDnBjNG= nWwUHfyWpyruzVCOskavEmsl6FcouU5Av1zLRT1sk4llUzZxXFtv6gzRBq2+aiCcoex3O+RRJbH= a89cMLy6jeZOCFahwVz6IyHcQ0b7gZjQgFQAAAIBA4vzSDy5oN27Ji3mF9ZklsSmlJJrrJxGJfO= n6/BK5tyvBijLy6tEJHrH3dY8TEJUp2V9RINKwcsy5LdqyI5gJRWoM8WdNzmUoIOLAW0HIVl2Ml= dKKqP/ctQwGI94EjykSUYVt/IAvUcjFuIrtiGrMDjsqfm7h1Gi2ZtDQ=3D=3D > root@domU-12-31-38-00-39-C8 > > > to the end of ~/.ssh/authorized_key on Slave. > > Something tells me there's a better way to do this. Is there? > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > wrote: > > > Actually I was wrong about adding keypair. It should be resolved by > adding > > master's public key to slave's authorized_keys. Amazon puts your keypai= r > in > > authroized_keys automatically. I missed that part. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Me again :( > > > > > > I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but now I > > can't > > > even go further than I did before :( > > > > > > Please let me know what step I am missing: > > > > > > 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for > Slave. > > > > > > 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > This is my "Master" window. > > > > > > 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > This is my "Slave" window. > > > > > > 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my loca= l > > > machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > > > 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' > > > > > > cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slave: > > > ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got > Permission > > > denied (public key) > > > ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > > > cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering KeyPair), > > copied > > > the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' fil= e > to > > > Master's 'authoried_key' file. > > > > > > Now, every time I try (from Master): > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > I get - "Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > But, when I type: > > > > > > ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem > > > > > > It works. > > > > > > I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doing > > wrong? > > > I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able to > > 'ssh' > > > to slave without using key pair, correct? > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Install a program called Jps. > > > > > > > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the > processes > > > (if > > > > they are running). > > > > > > > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages fro= m > > > > > ./all-start.sh > > > > > > > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > > > > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > > > > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one for > > > > Datanode > > > > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik < > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achieve > > that > > > > you > > > > > > need > > > > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to authorized_keys= "? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... Permissi= on > > > > denied > > > > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment issues= . > > > > Thanks > > > > > > for > > > > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair > from > > a > > > > > slave > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you a= re > > > using > > > > > to > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start working. > > > > > Furthrmore, > > > > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) and > if > > it > > > > > asks > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > (147.127.186.243)' > > > > can't > > > > > > > > be established. > > > > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > > > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes > > > > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > ,147.127.186.243' > > > > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine you > are > > > > trying > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp fro= m > my > > > > local > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I > mean... > > on > > > > my > > > > > > > Master > > > > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 instanc= e > > you > > > > need > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for Hadoo= p, > > you > > > > > need > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop > > access > > > to > > > > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature= -of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all th= e > > > slaves > > > > > to > > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is > behind > > a > > > > > corp > > > > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my > local > > > > > machine > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file fro= m > my > > > > > machine > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at > work) > > to > > > > the > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make sens= e? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2. = I > > am > > > > > > looking > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way, > > please > > > > let > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise y= ou > > > have > > > > no > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something Somethin= g > < > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > > > > ) > > > > > > > "It > > > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there execut= es > > an > > > > SCP > > > > > > > server > > > > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. = In > > any > > > > > case > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something > > Something > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. (Ye= s, > > > > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so I > can > > > > learn > > > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HDFS > on > > > the > > > > > > > master, > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)" - > > where > > > > > > 10.xxx > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh > from > > > the > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best way = to > > fix > > > > it? > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key > pair > > on > > > > my > > > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (I > > know, > > > I > > > > > > know, > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016367f934f47a03a0479362e2d-- From general-return-793-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 27 17:42:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4095 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2009 17:42:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 77075 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76987 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76977 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:03 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so1510966fxm.11 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:41:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=2lRaDA3Mi/RGEXc9bbY1aMlzwYMYnfH0ZAAfLjhih8U=; b=Qu9oLtSoYatDdwdnDidhSo6bf6/8C40FsQu+OteFpN16islQ7ML9a3ZJjufgYBN3OK flxkk5OmkL56tMNHCrv4rK5fJZ90E9udJqrOylDMdygCG4p6c9X2ULtfIre4gKXrfcXQ rIfoaiUWy/tjNEi4xXlPBQOZggWkh0h19um+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=AkJjE9RR00hnGXN5VBKGlGm21+7stOzDFdy1GabU7uE+lEPGC5J7MQPFTQRyqhh7D3 /xRPKJyASXCCiLff6J8Jim3laX/vddtOyD5vM8RuI1wOLkcAtGy8sbKYNs3GcAXiYpKJ 6ltkFCd0NOB6HQ78qDzb+PcKtwM0ezl/WuazI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.137 with SMTP id 9mr194332far.95.1259343701759; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:41:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:41:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Introducing Cloud MapReduce From: Bruce Snyder To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Given that Hadoop is the dominant project at the ASF for cloud-oriented Java applications, I'd like to introduce a new project in the open source world named Cloud MapReduce. Below are the pertinent details for the project followed by some info describing why I'm posting on this list. What: Created by Huan Liu and Dan Orban at Accenture Labs, Cloud MapReduce is a MapReduce framework built on top of the Amazon Infrastructure services. It utilizes these services (Amazon EC2, Amazon S3, Amazon SQS and Amazon SimpleDB) to create a unique MapReduce framework with some distinct advantages. Cloud MapReduce utilizes the Apache License 2.0. Where: The code base currently lives in a GoogleCode project so it is available for download by anyone: http://code.google.com/p/cloudmapreduce/ There is also more information about Cloud MapReduce at the website, including a detailed technical report. Why: Cloud MapReduce offers three primary advantages over other cloud frameworks: 1) It is faster than other implementations (e.g., 60 times faster than Hadoop in one case. Speedup depends on the application and data.). 2) It is more scalable and more failure resistant because it has no single point of bottleneck. 3) It is dramatically simpler with only 3,000 lines of code (e.g., two orders of magnitude simpler than Hadoop). Cloud MapReduce is a new framework that is seeking a good home. Creator Huan Liu came to me because, in his words, he 'wants to build a community around Cloud MapReduce.' What better place to do this than the ASF! In speaking with Doug Cutting and others at ApacheCon US a few weeks ago, we agreed that the best approach to begin would be via this list in order to get the best breadth possible across the Apache cloud-related community. In finding a home at the ASF for Cloud MapReduce, we are aware that it does not complement Hadoop really, so making it a subproject of Hadoop is not necessarily the best approach. Another approach would be to take it through the Incubator in order to eventually graduate as a top level project. Exposure to a wider audience is always the best way to grow an idea and to explore corners that we may have overlooked. The intent of this message is to start a conversation around Cloud MapReduce, ask question, discuss its future and generally figure out how best to bring it to the ASF. Hopefully the information here is enough for folks to begin asking questions. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4399 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2009 17:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 77904 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77814 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77804 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2009 17:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fredwang222@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:42:18 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so1208600pxi.2 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:41:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eE9zjKdxkC9NuM2+oK9rCAIllkEqlefPkm2iCNPWT34=; b=WKESHcKwWgEiTBTnBDQimbPI7fOJB9LQ+sm3HtwtIBdc5eya7/ASoifrQBnkTVv5zg 6rAUS9GrezDdQ8SKFeL+BBM7ZNlIAgxDkmyYk6NIcCOap953hZaG/YG+Oo7tMm3q86v3 SeKYMSB/4BOwevJdVF4TYv71U9W/kAJqUFEqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=fNCIgPPzF53IK7Fvqxi/KHbG5ZSGzJxCEKkhrI1HwlXLX5voZw2TcJyqOECIi95uDU +z3e+MK5S2CdCQ2V9KieRIrp1Iz/QwSn7rCL0my8tjJtGZbHgrOin5s5FfybkzSIy/hi 2U02PeNGlU+2oNEbCXSBLTDYj4v687Cwb5h2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.61.25 with SMTP id j25mr122798wfa.320.1259343718281; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:41:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:41:58 +0800 Message-ID: <702261350911270941h26165071i19415b71fe58b171@mail.gmail.com> Subject: "org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Communication exception: java.io.IOException: Call to /127.0.0.1:" from time to time From: fred wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b604fa73c004795dce22 --001636e0b604fa73c004795dce22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It occures in our hadoop cluster from time to time(the log is below). Anyone could help? I would like to know what are in the process of(after) committing? What kind of reasons could make communication error? I think the tasknode is alive. Thanks for the help. 2009-11-25 01:21:30,476 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:30,541 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=MAP, sessionId= 2009-11-25 01:21:30,559 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:31,584 INFO com.ibm.jaql.io.AdapterStore: instantiating empty AdapterStore 2009-11-25 01:21:31,616 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 27 2009-11-25 01:21:31,624 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:31,627 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 2009-11-25 01:21:31,799 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 2009-11-25 01:21:31,799 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 2009-11-25 01:21:33,266 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output 2009-11-25 01:21:33,277 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:37,187 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask: Finished spill 0 2009-11-25 01:21:37,236 WARN org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem: "master1:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://master1:9000/" instead. 2009-11-25 01:21:37,271 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Task:attempt_200911171829_0181_m_000008_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting 2009-11-25 01:22:37,323 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Communication exception: java.io.IOException: Call to /127.0.0.1:53674failed on local exception: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:774) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:742) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.$Proxy0.statusUpdate(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task$TaskReporter.run(Task.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException at java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:184) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.write(SocketChannelImpl.java:341) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream$Writer.performIO(SocketOutputStream.java:55) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:142) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:146) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:107) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:65) at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:123) at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.sendParam(Client.java:480) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:720) ... 4 more 2009-11-25 01:22:37,338 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner: Task 'attempt_200911171829_0181_m_000008_0' done. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --001636e0b604fa73c004795dce22-- From general-return-795-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 27 18:35:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16347 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2009 18:35:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 41422 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41349 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41339 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:35:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:34:55 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so431316eyf.23 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:34:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZrnP2JrysKozyUJrN585O8fdWlixKiXynrrr+MRH7fM=; b=fyTMK6TwuRlyOhtaCiaW1DIN9EX7ZW2U9NlU06SsSpZHBu3FKGQsoQ673H+KB/DLyr +aBi6019FpohCddju8pPsVrX3x/ZTTqMzZSiILtHkvaFEFwqWmfHV7aF7ZTNMX2yRokU ZEH/CkG+8Cywo1NNnx535uUguAOBYUx2T3cNU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T21cgEeJgTERo7U4PXezKIos6ovlI6sy2F7EcizRTHpTgsL9kFcDRoSfxspMn2MYKh zmSfCaT3bmjKNlb07gCqzuwvo5HN/zcLLMV0gcrOMOTv2YdMUxmvwhybd6PL4Gyw/GsV ylscuzh5bQQDVunR7KkegU6grTsw0QmECoTbA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.82 with SMTP id g60mr439135wef.98.1259346875348; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:34:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <32120a6a0911271034i150078b6s8d0b23b882c6079@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Introducing Cloud MapReduce From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Bruce, Interesting stuff. It looks like it only works with String Keys and Values (possibly a reason you see large performance gains with simpler serialization requirements) - have you any plans to support other types in the roadmap? Perhaps with Protobufs or Avro serialization? Have you considered using the same Mapper and Reducer class and method signatures so that a MR job could be written and launched against CloudMR or Hadoop? [The reason I ask is I am hacking an implementation of a single JVM, multithreaded MR framework that does this, so I can ship the same analysis I run on large datasets to people to run on small datasets also (much lighter than Hadoop but compatible). I am putting it on google code mapreduce4j. It might be nice if there was a standard MR API that people coded against and launched in various frameworks - just a thought]. Cheers, Tim On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Given that Hadoop is the dominant project at the ASF for > cloud-oriented Java applications, I'd like to introduce a new project > in the open source world named Cloud MapReduce. Below are the > pertinent details for the project followed by some info describing why > I'm posting on this list. > > What: Created by Huan Liu and Dan Orban at Accenture Labs, Cloud > MapReduce is a MapReduce framework built on top of the Amazon > Infrastructure services. It utilizes these services (Amazon EC2, > Amazon S3, Amazon SQS and Amazon SimpleDB) to create a unique > MapReduce framework with some distinct advantages. Cloud MapReduce > utilizes the Apache License 2.0. > > Where: The code base currently lives in a GoogleCode project so it is > available for download by anyone: > > http://code.google.com/p/cloudmapreduce/ > > There is also more information about Cloud MapReduce at the website, > including a detailed technical report. > > Why: Cloud MapReduce offers three primary advantages over other cloud > frameworks: > > 1) It is faster than other implementations (e.g., 60 times faster than > Hadoop in one case. Speedup depends on the application and data.). > 2) It is more scalable and more failure resistant because it has no > single point of bottleneck. > 3) It is dramatically simpler with only 3,000 lines of code (e.g., two > orders of magnitude simpler than Hadoop). > > > Cloud MapReduce is a new framework that is seeking a good home. > Creator Huan Liu came to me because, in his words, he 'wants to build > a community around Cloud MapReduce.' What better place to do this than > the ASF! In speaking with Doug Cutting and others at ApacheCon US a > few weeks ago, we agreed that the best approach to begin would be via > this list in order to get the best breadth possible across the Apache > cloud-related community. > > In finding a home at the ASF for Cloud MapReduce, we are aware that it > does not complement Hadoop really, so making it a subproject of Hadoop > is not necessarily the best approach. Another approach would be to > take it through the Incubator in order to eventually graduate as a top > level project. > > Exposure to a wider audience is always the best way to grow an idea > and to explore corners that we may have overlooked. The intent of this > message is to start a conversation around Cloud MapReduce, ask > question, discuss its future and generally figure out how best to > bring it to the ASF. Hopefully the information here is enough for > folks to begin asking questions. > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > From general-return-796-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 27 21:19:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54950 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2009 21:19:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2009 21:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 91059 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 21:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90974 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 21:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90964 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2009 21:19:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:19:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:18:55 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so1630021fxm.11 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:18:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4zVDQwe69tbByz07LbdIq4L/mXnm2Pf6PozBkuekyuY=; b=CecbGPctf+vY5+Q6emHjEbAx5PaicAUaZ7VDru/FudrmYDZk/czeHIDbPIAYLFboQy N830WpsDKBp/01wg18K//Y37L4tFXhHW0ky4wUZFjAkxBmFn1QlxlFwU9xJkHmYe3NGs IAMjH1QGrTHfU6qFPjMw/t5eP8GIrkQpkzLcs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CVKO6fHYwdyBmXDpenADn975gjbzBAmL9AUNnBbmKaDjLCLR9REF87j2la6ZX85O+r HvHpl8d2AROVBUbjYsY2qz1gZD+X+1h+PHuWdp3FLLWyo7FAWV7UlKqVT0KpP7+7667+ HRVUzXswL0n4yeU7272YOLgk+kJH0+gz4C9EU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.20.210 with SMTP id g18mr232280fab.9.1259356715548; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:18:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0911271034i150078b6s8d0b23b882c6079@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911271034i150078b6s8d0b23b882c6079@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:18:35 -0700 Message-ID: <7b3355cb0911271318u4797fc2br51a241bd0fa95465@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Introducing Cloud MapReduce From: Bruce Snyder To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Tim Robertson wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Interesting stuff. =A0It looks like it only works with String Keys and > Values (possibly a reason you see large performance gains with simpler > serialization requirements) - have you any plans to support other > types in the roadmap? Perhaps with Protobufs or Avro serialization? I can definitely see the need for supporting more than one type of key/value. We'll need to add this to the roadmap, thanks. > Have you considered using the same Mapper and Reducer class and method > signatures so that a MR job could be written and launched against > CloudMR or Hadoop? > [The reason I ask is I am hacking an implementation of a single JVM, > multithreaded MR framework that does this, so I can ship the same > analysis I run on large datasets to people to run on small datasets > also (much lighter than Hadoop but compatible). =A0I am putting it on > google code mapreduce4j. =A0It might be nice if there was a standard MR > API that people coded against and launched in various frameworks - > just a thought]. Excellent points, Tim. A point that I raised was trying to determine a standard sort of API that would work across implementations. So far I'm not sure if this means that we match what is already out there or if we provide interfaces for many languages or what. I like the idea, but I'll let Huan chime in here. Bruce --=20 perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96162 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2009 03:56:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2009 03:56:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 15970 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 03:56:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15866 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 03:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15856 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2009 03:56:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zs68j2ee@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:56:12 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1794521pzk.5 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:55:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zl1Lzc3o7wMJAXKjX5Ev9M0rZelg/K57WbCvulo5UpA=; b=IaVKYEJgYO5zfVxt0e1FBmRkHfhdoazApFM7ogPrzGI6KYeb6pC0CCzOQ90vfKQZut XOKR0ebX+IFPwj3pESCB8/pXlSL7oNzL2/5ylMqxyPTFYp0g95M94xOucS2smaJw1hLh TJO9G0po6nxitiztvvbLN5a9uK5ODO19C3r1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QNs5saExfZQKM9sC+tB7CwGKsqleXUx+zdMQKysC22Dq8K07IoeEJpdafmLWcPnOAi MJWaZm7JKyCWHir9CS9fRJLLxWS8ZWZ7qVhduzsTR6zNPLc5RiCNxcc7iATSBySRoF2B GV+9db0Qeyp1cXwHFBLRf1x+I/6HY32oXSCRs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.49.12 with SMTP id b12mr178113rvk.64.1259466951453; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:55:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:55:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? From: tom To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, =C2=A0I know Hadoop is a suite of software service for the cluster computing, including mapreduce implementation, distributed database, distributed file system, etc. =C2=A0the confusion to me is If cloudMapReduce just is focused on Cloud Computing Infrastructure and must be depend on overall distributed service provided and=C2=A0hidden by Cloud Computing Infrastructure? And, cloudMapReduce just can be a alternate implementation of MapReduce? Is it right? =C2=A0Best regards =C2=A0 =C2=A0Tom From general-return-798-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 29 04:37:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2308 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2009 04:37:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2009 04:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 28445 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 04:37:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28263 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 04:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28253 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2009 04:37:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:37:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.223] (HELO mail-bw0-f223.google.com) (209.85.218.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:37:24 +0000 Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1920654bwz.29 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:36:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fOltpQOFzw/nnksecVuTK/hnWw+OIUDgdjpfsAQ9RQI=; b=cMyjkWS2XuXNlY8+4daRydySnVzb5Dt/IxvimwIZV0X+aPvE1RTg0hPO7dzPY01iyZ EdBKoxWWEdzRh+D/w/lcWKUm4YnCQDlsD8LJ2Lg/FCTn1dmxaDSaHNax1i1m66+kQKde TVqcLmVpGEVTe4xXVcDB8s+vJjinnPwyn7dAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wpFTcVwEnxc1Fvd9EZYjpymzMZCRG7KUYGpBTXDxsVHOeC21+hW8YbAaQ317Fo84UO UdQiuMutP/t9btWtY/usSLk/6ZkdHZ+CAp8yiANa6NN5Cn47bjPQZOTCC9r5PXZ9y2+f nWt4LwDByIq3Ewt9MOhZc1/IPR1kJbKA6rUV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.13 with SMTP id j13mr2972770bkd.32.1259469419765; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:36:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:36:59 -0700 Message-ID: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? From: Bruce Snyder To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM, tom wrote: > Hi, > > =A0I know Hadoop is a suite of software service for the cluster > computing, including mapreduce implementation, distributed database, > distributed file system, etc. > =A0the confusion to me is If cloudMapReduce just is focused on Cloud > Computing Infrastructure and must be depend on overall distributed > service provided and=A0hidden by Cloud Computing Infrastructure? > > =A0And, cloudMapReduce just can be a alternate implementation of MapReduc= e? > =A0Is it right? Yes, Cloud MapReduce is an alternate implementation of MapReduce. The difference between Cloud MapReduce and Hadoop is that Cloud MapReduce depends upon the infrastructure services provided by Amazon (e.g., AMIs, S3, SQS and SimpleDB) instead of providing it's own implementation of each. On a side note, I find it interesting that Amazon is now offering a product based on Hadoop named Amazon Elastic MapReduce: http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ Bruce --=20 perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93217 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2009 10:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2009 10:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 7782 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 10:13:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7686 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 10:13:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7672 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2009 10:13:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:13:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.217] (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:13:24 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so165834ewy.11 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:13:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ygEU+JFBqWJMV4kDuorUGIf8VImZ9lrSy2ld/3SQyhE=; b=rZ4fVbe7OLOyLG2X3VaBc4dvNZtxNWAfyFb+zT2CMczONuxMeuvO4kZACSE4wFnhul FXW6WNdq1Y7ISEdKz/v9azWb4HEVRK2Qc4xH/zvQcA1E3OMTwYlo8n/HHEpXa8DdW0XN kGV2XX3YBV7XCHkMZnozDJdbgxziFiWhywIn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TP8H7ZxRKbJWPz1xiRkM7OhXsdc7lkeTY5Km5R0PvMtxDhOn/i66EvCYEBT+9MmHoH mv/vLLstSk5Jz0GhzOH3FWr5hDgh1G/2RMkz4bUDlKNaQTuCwvFUavbVJ6+HYzjBm5th ongurIXf6IeN/cfn9FC7+3KCp+NvtkqfJpQyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.7 with SMTP id x7mr946480wee.53.1259489583271; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:13:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:13:03 +0100 Message-ID: <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tom, One major difference is that Hadoop allows working with any object that you can serialize, rather than only Strings so it is applicable for use with (e.g) image processing, or rendering to images or PDFs on the output format. Cheers Tim On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Bruce Snyder wrot= e: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM, tom wrote: >> Hi, >> >> =A0I know Hadoop is a suite of software service for the cluster >> computing, including mapreduce implementation, distributed database, >> distributed file system, etc. >> =A0the confusion to me is If cloudMapReduce just is focused on Cloud >> Computing Infrastructure and must be depend on overall distributed >> service provided and=A0hidden by Cloud Computing Infrastructure? >> >> =A0And, cloudMapReduce just can be a alternate implementation of MapRedu= ce? >> =A0Is it right? > > Yes, Cloud MapReduce is an alternate implementation of MapReduce. The > difference between Cloud MapReduce and Hadoop is that Cloud MapReduce > depends upon the infrastructure services provided by Amazon (e.g., > AMIs, S3, SQS and SimpleDB) instead of providing it's own > implementation of each. > > On a side note, I find it interesting that Amazon is now offering a > product based on Hadoop named Amazon Elastic MapReduce: > > http://aws.amazon.com/elasticmapreduce/ > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > From general-return-800-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 29 16:16:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65606 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2009 16:16:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2009 16:16:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 23419 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 16:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 16:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23316 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2009 16:16:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:16:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:16:22 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so2392924fxm.11 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:16:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rmsVzmWHuTqPFj2vcWx1FRpfeTmnHIe1J0marxAcVuA=; b=RTEeS6doGry+6EmFnsUKJqU5gZQ7oXM9dX/573MjgT80ObzFpFfTM3O3n9jf/mssme i5uJQQC/ohokvbKCJWMJWxSzi3tmIj+V099RknXWkuI2pulmACrErFxa78x2p4Vzgw+9 66ZE4KGakRPQx9aJXKEYmEIR+n2Y5ICTbbdLA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rtT5MCj5Rl7sCpr+FJrDCE3hwGKgfmT52mSaj+yS9RrNUGaOzCp6icHlh0yhCH2L7X vB7Vgu+lNklZEA0Y1wcYL1QEL6M2wE7usdDdYC5Od/bnMebXEFUkFyScpeB8j7cecoPI ze4ABuHCmIj8FDBs4R0Q2Kuf7bTT5Ts1yZ1Xk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.144.85 with SMTP id y21mr520153fau.1.1259511361242; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:16:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:16:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? From: Bruce Snyder To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tim Robertson wrote: > Hi Tom, > > One major difference is that Hadoop allows working with any object > that you can serialize, rather than only Strings so it is applicable > for use with (e.g) image processing, or rendering to images or PDFs on > the output format. Yes, you noted this on the general@hadoop list. I think your suggestion to expand this to support other types is a good one. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97999 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2009 18:15:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2009 18:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 76085 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 18:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76001 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2009 18:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75991 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2009 18:15:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:15:41 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1992875pzk.5 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:15:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.61.35 with SMTP id j35mr357386wfa.52.1259518521105; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:15:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:15:01 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b62009dd5b0479868282 --001636e0b62009dd5b0479868282 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another difference is that Cloud Mapreduce doesn't scale well when there are a large number of values for the same key. They collect in a single SQS queue per partition, and in the reducer reads that into a hashtable that never spills to disk. So, if you have more values for a key than fit in RAM, you can't run a job. Hadoop on the other hand spills reduce input to disk when it's too large to sort in memory. The paper says to add more partitions if you have a lot of data, but it doesn't help in the case of skewed reduce input (very common in a lot of workloads) -Todd On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tim Robertson > wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > One major difference is that Hadoop allows working with any object > > that you can serialize, rather than only Strings so it is applicable > > for use with (e.g) image processing, or rendering to images or PDFs on > > the output format. > > Yes, you noted this on the general@hadoop list. I think your > suggestion to expand this to support other types is a good one. > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > --001636e0b62009dd5b0479868282-- From general-return-802-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 07:52:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47183 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 07:52:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 07:52:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 91435 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 07:52:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91341 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 07:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91331 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 07:52:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:52:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.217] (HELO mail-ew0-f217.google.com) (209.85.219.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:52:29 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so856675ewy.11 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:52:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GPgxUE3VdyUyR7gucPILdMTDoDD8aWQP/tqsMnq+np8=; b=Aa778vmzktaCfDT7lMkggmQqPG5Q+dJi7uXu/WlUTwNwIwhqkai7o56bRjkrRQuT8Q p6U0EyROUief6hBLzAeWY6hIV7fQRQRDWA0pbbZMpPvTUy1+RgqUy5oD47xJJlSMX8V/ 02migRdhEppmdUgxXnvgo0Z4W75GdxSNw7A+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZQsGruDjfqJYkzFhk7yvs8MAcgO9W/o1yy+YcpGhcllP0nFpk5ksXwowENjHcrS+Aq ypK6xl+rMgmm3aa+k4TjwS8+7iUQsQ4jbgg2ybgJNRzsOwjXIk+EGny/GPInNvGBQWbq jgD8oIid6G7YmwXVxdeH5PfXIjQnuo3JxTSvo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.212 with SMTP id w62mr1367782wee.131.1259567525760; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:52:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2eef7bd70911251025s73655a79ned5f6418caba81fb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241116n6f81550fpfeec6b88c382e0b4@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250945i49684a5am6510cc6ffb7f86c8@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911251025s73655a79ned5f6418caba81fb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:52:05 -0800 Message-ID: <1eabbac30911292352k4f912452j52cab4b532460f05@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a3a2f18ee6047991ea68 --0016e6d9a3a2f18ee6047991ea68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Everything started working after I added the following line to hadoop-env.s= h export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"$HADOOP_SSH_OPTS -i /mnt/myVol/KeyPairName.pem " Thanks for your help. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Vaibhav Puranik wrote= : > On master, in .ssh folder, there should be a file id_dsa.pub. This is > master's public key. > > Contents of this file should be copied to slave's authorized_keys file. > > Regards, > Vaibhav > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can you please explain what you mean by "add master's public key to > slave's > > authorized_keys"? I have a feeling I am not doing this correctly. Wha= t > I > > did is this: > > > > 1) On Master, opened ~/.ssh/authorized_key and copied lines that look > like > > this... > > > > ssh-dss > > > > > AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAKJOife8p+6vjJ/jODSWaBgyawN7XWmasasasb0cVqhe1WOpnJQpX= uJeqsaBaZYHYxj8P74m1rOIdN9lSPAz6gEjHo4ft8UM7ZVExRC6HDM7JdfdferhwRgQSVI9ruTL= lssO9i1D17mBnLotsgy92CyS7bsanM25nRqhmvqkX7tuKp66nlAAAAFQCnbwPn3v+ttorRZ4Oij= kAKoJaVFQAAAIAGVyZGwkm5DwYvige0VYhXZns8qSvW15dwSrS1a6k41q3C91AQZylvJYDnBjNG= nWwUHfyWpyruzVCOskavEmsl6FcouU5Av1zLRT1sk4llUzZxXFtv6gzRBq2+aiCcoex3O+RRJbH= a89cMLy6jeZOCFahwVz6IyHcQ0b7gZjQgFQAAAIBA4vzSDy5oN27Ji3mF9ZklsSmlJJrrJxGJfO= n6/BK5tyvBijLy6tEJHrH3dY8TEJUp2V9RINKwcsy5LdqyI5gJRWoM8WdNzmUoIOLAW0HIVl2Ml= dKKqP/ctQwGI94EjykSUYVt/IAvUcjFuIrtiGrMDjsqfm7h1Gi2ZtDQ=3D=3D > > root@domU-12-31-38-00-39-C8 > > > > > > to the end of ~/.ssh/authorized_key on Slave. > > > > Something tells me there's a better way to do this. Is there? > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > wrote: > > > > > Actually I was wrong about adding keypair. It should be resolved by > > adding > > > master's public key to slave's authorized_keys. Amazon puts your > keypair > > in > > > authroized_keys automatically. I missed that part. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Something Something < > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Me again :( > > > > > > > > I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but now = I > > > can't > > > > even go further than I did before :( > > > > > > > > Please let me know what step I am missing: > > > > > > > > 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for > > Slave. > > > > > > > > 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: > > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > > > This is my "Master" window. > > > > > > > > 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: > > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > > > This is my "Slave" window. > > > > > > > > 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my > local > > > > machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. > > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > > > > > 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' > > > > > > > > cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slave: > > > > ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got > > Permission > > > > denied (public key) > > > > ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > > > > cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering KeyPair)= , > > > copied > > > > the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' > file > > to > > > > Master's 'authoried_key' file. > > > > > > > > Now, every time I try (from Master): > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > I get - "Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > But, when I type: > > > > > > > > ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem > > > > > > > > It works. > > > > > > > > I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doing > > > wrong? > > > > I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able t= o > > > 'ssh' > > > > to slave without using key pair, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Install a program called Jps. > > > > > > > > > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the > > processes > > > > (if > > > > > they are running). > > > > > > > > > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages > from > > > > > > ./all-start.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > > > > > > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one f= or > > > > > Datanode > > > > > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves too= . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to achie= ve > > > that > > > > > you > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to > authorized_keys"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... > Permission > > > > > denied > > > > > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment > issues. > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypair > > from > > > a > > > > > > slave > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair you > are > > > > using > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start workin= g. > > > > > > Furthrmore, > > > > > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) a= nd > > if > > > it > > > > > > asks > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > > (147.127.186.243)' > > > > > can't > > > > > > > > > be established. > > > > > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > > > > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? ye= s > > > > > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > > ,147.127.186.243' > > > > > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine yo= u > > are > > > > > trying > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp > from > > my > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I > > mean... > > > on > > > > > my > > > > > > > > Master > > > > > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 > instance > > > you > > > > > need > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for > Hadoop, > > > you > > > > > > need > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hadoop > > > access > > > > to > > > > > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature= -of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from all > the > > > > slaves > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Something = < > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem correctly= . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which is > > behind > > > a > > > > > > corp > > > > > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to my > > local > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file > from > > my > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine at > > work) > > > to > > > > > the > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make > sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for EC2= . > I > > > am > > > > > > > looking > > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier way= , > > > please > > > > > let > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwise > you > > > > have > > > > > no > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something > Something > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > "It > > > > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there > executes > > > an > > > > > SCP > > > > > > > > server > > > > > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, either. > In > > > any > > > > > > case > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something > > > Something > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. > (Yes, > > > > > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself so= I > > can > > > > > learn > > > > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start HD= FS > > on > > > > the > > > > > > > > master, > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied)"= - > > > where > > > > > > > 10.xxx > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't ssh > > from > > > > the > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best wa= y > to > > > fix > > > > > it? > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a key > > pair > > > on > > > > > my > > > > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? (= I > > > know, > > > > I > > > > > > > know, > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d9a3a2f18ee6047991ea68-- From general-return-803-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 09:36:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73397 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 09:36:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 09:36:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 87222 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 09:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87118 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 09:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87108 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 09:36:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:36:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.72] (HELO amrmr1003.accenture.com) (170.252.248.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:36:17 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1003.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.63]) by amrmr1003.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAU9ZkwY002063 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:35:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3002.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.24]) by AMRXV1003.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:35:53 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.14]) by AMRXH3002.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.24]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:35:52 -0500 From: To: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:35:20 -0500 Subject: RE: Introducing Cloud MapReduce Thread-Topic: Introducing Cloud MapReduce thread-index: Acpvp0TKSUz6VIBZSEyA06CquAPzPwB961SQ Message-ID: References: <7b3355cb0911270941s219c492w63d8ce6c83eeb96b@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911271034i150078b6s8d0b23b882c6079@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911271318u4797fc2br51a241bd0fa95465@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0911271318u4797fc2br51a241bd0fa95465@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: etMPdlPBeLL1MrCNXtYgQA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 09:35:53.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[82AC33B0:01CA71A0] > From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:bruce.snyder@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 1:19 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Introducing Cloud MapReduce >=20 > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Tim Robertson > wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Interesting stuff. It looks like it only works with String Keys and > > Values (possibly a reason you see large performance gains with > simpler > > serialization requirements) - have you any plans to support other > > types in the roadmap? Perhaps with Protobufs or Avro serialization? >=20 > I can definitely see the need for supporting more than one type of > key/value. We'll need to add this to the roadmap, thanks. Added to the roadmap. Thanks for the suggestion. =20 > > Have you considered using the same Mapper and Reducer class and > method > > signatures so that a MR job could be written and launched against > > CloudMR or Hadoop? > > [The reason I ask is I am hacking an implementation of a single JVM, > > multithreaded MR framework that does this, so I can ship the same > > analysis I run on large datasets to people to run on small datasets > > also (much lighter than Hadoop but compatible). I am putting it on > > google code mapreduce4j. It might be nice if there was a standard = MR > > API that people coded against and launched in various frameworks - > > just a thought]. >=20 > Excellent points, Tim. A point that I raised was trying to determine a > standard sort of API that would work across implementations. So far > I'm not sure if this means that we match what is already out there or > if we provide interfaces for many languages or what. I like the idea, > but I'll let Huan chime in here. The eventual goal is to be able to run a Hadoop job as it is in Cloud = MapReduce, so that one can easily port his/her application to a = different platform, but we are some distance away from that. To be fully = compatible, it requires us to implement/fake a lot of interfaces in = Hadoop, such as the different input readers and the configuration = mechanism (many parameters are not needed in CMR). We will look into the = mapreduce4j implementation to see what we can leverage. Thanks for the = excellent suggestion. -Huan This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-804-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 09:49:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81150 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 09:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 09:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 18378 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 09:49:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18278 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 09:49:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18158 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 09:49:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:49:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of huan.liu@accenture.com designates 170.252.248.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [170.252.248.72] (HELO amrmr1003.accenture.com) (170.252.248.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:49:16 +0000 Received: from AMRXV1004.dir.svc.accenture.com (amrxv1004.dir.svc.accenture.com [10.10.160.64]) by amrmr1003.accenture.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAU9mZYP013289 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:48:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMRXH3003.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.25]) by AMRXV1004.dir.svc.accenture.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:48:51 -0600 Received: from AMRXM3124.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.14]) by AMRXH3003.dir.svc.accenture.com ([10.63.34.25]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:48:51 -0500 From: Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.3168 Priority: normal To: Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:48:18 -0500 Subject: RE: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? Thread-Topic: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? thread-index: AcpxH/2sedDYMy4sQW68WFU69/WGTgAgH1gA Message-ID: References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {F495B747-5C01-4E04-B23E-3471B59521E1} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: Wjo= AnVH BDJm BkiM B/BN ERCE Egep EsIr FOv1 GYTO HQwU Hffy Hv7b JJzA JNvh KQdv;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{F495B747-5C01-4E04-B23E-3471B59521E1};aAB1AGEAbgAuAGwAaQB1AEAAYQBjAGMAZQBuAHQAdQByAGUALgBjAG8AbQA=;Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:48:18 GMT;UgBFADoAIAB3AGgAYQB0ACAAaQBzACAAdABoAGUAIABtAGEAagBvAHIAIABkAGkAZgBmAGUAcgBlAG4AYwBlACAAYgBlAHQAdwBlAGUAbgAgAEgAYQBkAG8AbwBwACAAYQBuAGQAIABjAGwAbwB1AGQATQBhAHAAUgBlAGQAdQBjAGUAPwA= acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: vrAiQuOOcsXVFhS7ec6D4A== x-ems-stamp: 5AoCVe+HDnU0sosatIXf7g== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 09:48:51.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[52B38DA0:01CA71A2] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd,=20 We do not keep all values for a key in memory. Instead, we only keep the = partial reduce result in memory, but throw away the value as soon as it = is used. The point you raised is still very valid if the reduce state = maintained per key is large, which I hope is a very rare case. If you = have some concrete workload examples, it will help us prioritize the = development effort. I can definitely see the benefits of introducing a = paging mechanism to spill partial reduce results to the output SQS queue = in the future. Thanks. -Huan > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:15 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > cloudMapReduce? >=20 > Another difference is that Cloud Mapreduce doesn't scale well when > there are > a large number of values for the same key. They collect in a single = SQS > queue per partition, and in the reducer reads that into a hashtable > that > never spills to disk. So, if you have more values for a key than fit = in > RAM, > you can't run a job. Hadoop on the other hand spills reduce input to > disk > when it's too large to sort in memory. The paper says to add more > partitions > if you have a lot of data, but it doesn't help in the case of skewed > reduce > input (very common in a lot of workloads) >=20 > -Todd >=20 > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Bruce Snyder > wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tim Robertson > > wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > One major difference is that Hadoop allows working with any object > > > that you can serialize, rather than only Strings so it is > applicable > > > for use with (e.g) image processing, or rendering to images or = PDFs > on > > > the output format. > > > > Yes, you noted this on the general@hadoop list. I think your > > suggestion to expand this to support other types is a good one. > > > > Bruce > > -- > > perl -e 'print > > = unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E > );' > > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain = privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have = received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete = the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. From general-return-805-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 16:07:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27843 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 16:07:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 16:07:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7096 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7031 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 16:07:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7020 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 16:07:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:07:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vpuranik@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.187] (HELO mail-px0-f187.google.com) (209.85.216.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:07:07 +0000 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so4462962pxi.30 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rsGRkhOb6RBeznZFerGBjUHiLkJ3RSutvS7v1vMIZBo=; b=lvy2jw7iOv/jNovjQ01iuypGYcLu9327Z3N/riyOf3gZ44OH7CwAttBLO1zc78jTbn 8Pyi8j69e31fMaGJ5fh6GTEoGgTM8fOwZrQ8+TsYU+cHZobt8nSHMmb5jDkbOA5oz/V5 Mcrw6RBv0wo01l0fJtwCk0Mi0Nxxb3Nc5g3Qo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ox0aBZfmOx2/5Upu9iPxVK7dnY8mgUpVwTapW792AYll8COOM1DyViHHsj2s0l8WL9 Plf4rB+hYgQ3On59PZwvMUf86AMchqFhjjCcILLW/XHQ/wfSGV03f9UAsdPpFiDkGM8U pefcY01C5Hp29NPOkzdm2pW2uqAutlpqBtRNc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.55.34 with SMTP id d34mr7939920waa.225.1259597205307; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac30911292352k4f912452j52cab4b532460f05@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac30911211657i7812c67bs3a1565b0537b418f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241338g1067b99dra633f21f2d0cfd10@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241344p4225190fkaaafc160a5c9bb80@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911241406v1a684661va156ab6a856819c3@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911241458x6e2de4dfx60ef8e68b636f78e@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250838w3d4b089ascb2e0b21245a60ae@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911250921p5d2558fq8766748c47dbfb3f@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911250945i49684a5am6510cc6ffb7f86c8@mail.gmail.com> <2eef7bd70911251025s73655a79ned5f6418caba81fb@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac30911292352k4f912452j52cab4b532460f05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:06:45 -0800 Message-ID: <2eef7bd70911300806n274a3819oe06cd2b3d488fc0e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Starting Hadoop cluster on EC2 From: Vaibhav Puranik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369204c7fb8356047998d3da X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016369204c7fb8356047998d3da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. I didn't know that you could do that. Regards, Vaibhav On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Everything started working after I added the following line to > hadoop-env.sh > > export HADOOP_SSH_OPTS=3D"$HADOOP_SSH_OPTS -i /mnt/myVol/KeyPairName.pem = " > > Thanks for your help. > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Vaibhav Puranik >wrote: > > > On master, in .ssh folder, there should be a file id_dsa.pub. This is > > master's public key. > > > > Contents of this file should be copied to slave's authorized_keys file. > > > > Regards, > > Vaibhav > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Something Something < > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Can you please explain what you mean by "add master's public key to > > slave's > > > authorized_keys"? I have a feeling I am not doing this correctly. > What > > I > > > did is this: > > > > > > 1) On Master, opened ~/.ssh/authorized_key and copied lines that loo= k > > like > > > this... > > > > > > ssh-dss > > > > > > > > > AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAKJOife8p+6vjJ/jODSWaBgyawN7XWmasasasb0cVqhe1WOpnJQpX= uJeqsaBaZYHYxj8P74m1rOIdN9lSPAz6gEjHo4ft8UM7ZVExRC6HDM7JdfdferhwRgQSVI9ruTL= lssO9i1D17mBnLotsgy92CyS7bsanM25nRqhmvqkX7tuKp66nlAAAAFQCnbwPn3v+ttorRZ4Oij= kAKoJaVFQAAAIAGVyZGwkm5DwYvige0VYhXZns8qSvW15dwSrS1a6k41q3C91AQZylvJYDnBjNG= nWwUHfyWpyruzVCOskavEmsl6FcouU5Av1zLRT1sk4llUzZxXFtv6gzRBq2+aiCcoex3O+RRJbH= a89cMLy6jeZOCFahwVz6IyHcQ0b7gZjQgFQAAAIBA4vzSDy5oN27Ji3mF9ZklsSmlJJrrJxGJfO= n6/BK5tyvBijLy6tEJHrH3dY8TEJUp2V9RINKwcsy5LdqyI5gJRWoM8WdNzmUoIOLAW0HIVl2Ml= dKKqP/ctQwGI94EjykSUYVt/IAvUcjFuIrtiGrMDjsqfm7h1Gi2ZtDQ=3D=3D > > > root@domU-12-31-38-00-39-C8 > > > > > > > > > to the end of ~/.ssh/authorized_key on Slave. > > > > > > Something tells me there's a better way to do this. Is there? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Vaibhav Puranik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Actually I was wrong about adding keypair. It should be resolved by > > > adding > > > > master's public key to slave's authorized_keys. Amazon puts your > > keypair > > > in > > > > authroized_keys automatically. I missed that part. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Something Something < > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Me again :( > > > > > > > > > > I decided to start fresh so that I can document the steps, but no= w > I > > > > can't > > > > > even go further than I did before :( > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know what step I am missing: > > > > > > > > > > 1) Launched 2 instances on AWS console - one for Master, one for > > > Slave. > > > > > > > > > > 2) In one command window, connected to instance 1: > > > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > > > > > This is my "Master" window. > > > > > > > > > > 3) Opened another command window & connected to instance 2: > > > > > ssh -i MyKeyPair.pem > > > > > (Got 'authenticity' warning.. typed 'yes') > > > > > > > > > > This is my "Slave" window. > > > > > > > > > > 4) Opened another command window and 'scp' the key pair (from my > > local > > > > > machine) to instance 1 & instance 2. > > > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > > scp -i MyKeyPair.pem MyKeyPair.pem :/tmp > > > > > > > > > > 5) On BOTH (Master & Slave) added Key Pair to 'authorized_key' > > > > > > > > > > cat /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > 6) To setup passphraseless ssh ran these on BOTH - Master & Slav= e: > > > > > ssh localhost (Got 'authenticiy' message. Typed 'yes'. Got > > > Permission > > > > > denied (public key) > > > > > ssh-keygen -t dsa -P '' -f ~/.ssh/id_dsa > > > > > cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > 7) In order to ssh from Master to Slave (without entering > KeyPair), > > > > copied > > > > > the key (that starts with 'sh-dss') from Slave's 'authorized_key' > > file > > > to > > > > > Master's 'authoried_key' file. > > > > > > > > > > Now, every time I try (from Master): > > > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > > > I get - "Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > But, when I type: > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i /tmp/MyKeyPair.pem > > > > > > > > > > It works. > > > > > > > > > > I thought step #5 above should have resolved this. What am I doi= ng > > > > wrong? > > > > > I believe, in order for me to start the cluster, I should be able > to > > > > 'ssh' > > > > > to slave without using key pair, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vaibhav Puranik < > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Install a program called Jps. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a ps for java processes. execute jps, you should see the > > > processes > > > > > (if > > > > > > they are running). > > > > > > > > > > > > Also make sure you check your logs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Awesome. Thanks, Vaibhav. Made progress. No error messages > > from > > > > > > > ./all-start.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will test to see if the cluster is deployed properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: On the slave, when I do: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps -eaf | grep 'hadoop' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't see any processes. Shouldn't I see 2 processes - one > for > > > > > > Datanode > > > > > > > and the other for TaskTracker? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know. Thanks again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I pretty much meant that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add your master's public key to authorized_keys on slaves > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. but not sure what you mean by... "In order to > achieve > > > > that > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > to add the keypair you are using to your > > > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cat KeyPair.pem >> /root/.ssh/authorized_keys > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you meant by "add the keypair to > > authorized_keys"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Still can't ssh from Slave to Master. It says..... > > Permission > > > > > > denied > > > > > > > > > (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am a newbie when it comes to such environment > > issues. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > your patience. It's greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to be able to SSH without specifying the keypa= ir > > > from > > > > a > > > > > > > slave > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > master (I think reverse it true too, but I am not sure)= . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to achieve that you need to add the keypair y= ou > > are > > > > > using > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > auhtorized_keys file in the home dir/.ssh folder. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once you setup passphraseless ssh, it should start > working. > > > > > > > Furthrmore, > > > > > > > > > > after you set this up, try to ssh manully (without key) > and > > > if > > > > it > > > > > > > asks > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > the following message - say yes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The authenticity of host > > > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > > > (147.127.186.243)' > > > > > > can't > > > > > > > > > > be established. > > > > > > > > > > RSA key fingerprint is > > > > > > > 4b:63:e2:23:16:6f:b6:99:de:34:f6:9b:f5:55:73:8b. > > > > > > > > > > Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? > yes > > > > > > > > > > Warning: Permanently added > > > > > > > > > > 'ec2-147-127-186-243.compute-1.amazonaws.com > > > ,147.127.186.243' > > > > > > > > > > (RSA) to the list of known hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you have to make sure that the machine > you > > > are > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > > > is in your known_hosts file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Something Something < > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vaibhav. That was helpful. I am able to scp > > from > > > my > > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > > after I opened port 22 under my security group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But my cluster is still not starting as expected. I > > > mean... > > > > on > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > Master > > > > > > > > > > > when I run: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./start-all.sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get messages saying... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10.252.xxx.xxx: Permission denied (publickey). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where 10.252.xxx.xxx is the ip address of my Slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can ssh from my Slave to master if I do this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh -i .pem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Vaibhav Puranik < > > > > > > > vpuranik@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to use scp from your machine to an ec2 > > instance > > > > you > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > > -i and give it the path of your keypair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp -i /path/my/ec2/keypair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly in order to configure an ec2 cluster for > > Hadoop, > > > > you > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > security group (let's call it hadoop) and give hado= op > > > > access > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > hadoop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can read more about security groups here - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://somic.org/2009/09/21/security-groups-most-underappreciated-feature= -of-amazon-ec2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You also need to make sure that you can ssh from al= l > > the > > > > > slaves > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > > > > without specifying password. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Vaibhav Puranik > > > > > > > > > > > > GumGum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Something Somethin= g > < > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like I am not explaining my problem > correctly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Key Pair file is on my machine at work which i= s > > > behind > > > > a > > > > > > > corp > > > > > > > > > > > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > > > > > As such I can't 'scp' from the ec2 instance to m= y > > > local > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'get' the file. So I need a way to 'send' a file > > from > > > my > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > instance. I tried using 'scp' (from my machine a= t > > > work) > > > > to > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > but it says "Permission denied". Does this make > > sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May be I need to use the command line tools for > EC2. > > I > > > > am > > > > > > > > looking > > > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > > those right now, but if there's a better/easier > way, > > > > please > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > > know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks once again for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ssh is installed on ec2 by default, otherwi= se > > you > > > > > have > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > login > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to ec2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Something > > Something > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As per Wikipedia ( > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_copy > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > "It > > > > > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connecting to the host using SSH and there > > executes > > > > an > > > > > > SCP > > > > > > > > > server > > > > > > > > > > > > > (scp)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if SSH isn't working SCP won't work, eithe= r. > > In > > > > any > > > > > > > case > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > tried > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but getting "Permission denied (public key)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Jeff Zhang < > > > > > > > > zjffdu@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You should scp the key-pair to EC2 machine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Something > > > > Something > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying to start a Hadoop cluster on EC2. > > (Yes, > > > > > > > > Cloudera's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > works well, but trying to do this myself = so > I > > > can > > > > > > learn > > > > > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behind the scene.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a Master & a Slave. When I start > HDFS > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > master, > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying "10.xxx.xxx.xxx (Permission denied= )" > - > > > > where > > > > > > > > 10.xxx > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > address > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the slave. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basic problem (I think) is that I can't s= sh > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > > > master > > > > > > > > > > EC2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Slave EC2 instance. What's the best > way > > to > > > > fix > > > > > > it? > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Key Pair" file on my master. I have a k= ey > > > pair > > > > on > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > local > > > > > > > > > > > > > machine, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do I transfer it to the EC2 machine? > (I > > > > know, > > > > > I > > > > > > > > know, > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > agree.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dumb :) Should I FTP it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016369204c7fb8356047998d3da-- From general-return-806-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 16:16:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37029 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 16:16:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 16:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 25241 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 16:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25160 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 16:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25150 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 16:16:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.187] (HELO mail-px0-f187.google.com) (209.85.216.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:08 +0000 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so4474330pxi.30 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.5 with SMTP id i5mr466924wfa.102.1259597747410; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7b3355cb0911282036x394f0acft21da05803b16a01@mail.gmail.com> <32120a6a0911290213m5563e1fge8bcc4413909a505@mail.gmail.com> <7b3355cb0911290816h1dc160e4ua30054c438702215@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f70911291015m5165421fsf75f28bc698f28ed@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:27 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f70911300815q2e86c64r92e28654af38840d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and cloudMapReduce? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ad3b4b57f8047998f466 --00504502ad3b4b57f8047998f466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:48 AM, wrote: > Todd, > > We do not keep all values for a key in memory. Instead, we only keep the > partial reduce result in memory, but throw away the value as soon as it is > used. The point you raised is still very valid if the reduce state > maintained per key is large, which I hope is a very rare case. If you have > some concrete workload examples, it will help us prioritize the development > effort. I can definitely see the benefits of introducing a paging mechanism > to spill partial reduce results to the output SQS queue in the future. > Thanks. > Hi Huan, I guess I misremembered or misread the paper. Given this technique, doesn't it mean that reducers can only work when commutative and associative? -Todd > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:todd@cloudera.com] > > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:15 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: what is the major difference between Hadoop and > > cloudMapReduce? > > > > Another difference is that Cloud Mapreduce doesn't scale well when > > there are > > a large number of values for the same key. They collect in a single SQS > > queue per partition, and in the reducer reads that into a hashtable > > that > > never spills to disk. So, if you have more values for a key than fit in > > RAM, > > you can't run a job. Hadoop on the other hand spills reduce input to > > disk > > when it's too large to sort in memory. The paper says to add more > > partitions > > if you have a lot of data, but it doesn't help in the case of skewed > > reduce > > input (very common in a lot of workloads) > > > > -Todd > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Bruce Snyder > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tim Robertson > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > One major difference is that Hadoop allows working with any object > > > > that you can serialize, rather than only Strings so it is > > applicable > > > > for use with (e.g) image processing, or rendering to images or PDFs > > on > > > > the output format. > > > > > > Yes, you noted this on the general@hadoop list. I think your > > > suggestion to expand this to support other types is a good one. > > > > > > Bruce > > > -- > > > perl -e 'print > > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > > );' > > > > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > > > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > > > > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the > original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > --00504502ad3b4b57f8047998f466-- From general-return-807-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 19:55:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55846 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 19:55:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 19:55:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 48134 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 19:55:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48079 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 19:55:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48069 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 19:55:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:55:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vogt7@llnl.gov designates 128.115.41.83 as permitted sender) Received: from [128.115.41.83] (HELO smtp.llnl.gov) (128.115.41.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:54:54 +0000 X-Attachments: None Received: from poisonivy.llnl.gov (HELO [128.115.210.109]) ([128.115.210.109]) by smtp.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2009 11:54:32 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:54:31 -0800 Subject: Scribe vs. Chukwa From: Kim Vogt To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Scribe vs. Chukwa Thread-Index: Acpx9u50+HtKxaEtHUuAzUfAGnnRsg== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3342426872_847723" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --B_3342426872_847723 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hi, My team is looking into using Scribe or Chukwa for hadoop log collection. = I was wondering if anyone had any opinions about one vs. the other? I apologize if this topic was covered before, but I don=B9t see a link to the archives for this mailing list. Thanks, Kim --B_3342426872_847723-- From general-return-808-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 30 21:57:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24137 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 21:57:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 21:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 61757 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 21:57:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61678 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 21:57:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61668 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 21:57:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:57:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:57:09 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id nAULuJuG088202 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:56:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=uULhc4EAQ4jZu2BnyIftLZGaWcqgVDODOWmzVMfmJrDaV/mJGzczfRxx5iiDkT4N Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:56:19 -0800 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:55:58 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:55:58 -0800 Subject: Re: Scribe vs. Chukwa From: Eric Yang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Scribe vs. Chukwa Thread-Index: Acpx9u50+HtKxaEtHUuAzUfAGnnRsgAEPdkX In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2009 21:56:19.0658 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2C16AA0:01CA7207] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Kim, Scribe works well for simple deployment. The complexity increases when "central scribe server" is multi-machines deployment. Basically, it requires a reverse proxy to load balance the data collection. ( http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2008/11/02/configuring-and-using-scribe-for-ha= d oop-log-collection/ ) I have not used scribe personally, therefore someone else could fill in the experience. Chukwa was designed to be fault tolerant log collection/analytics platform. Each chukwa agent automatically creates it's own routing table to chukwa collectors. Therefore, Chukwa does not require a reverse proxy. However, Chukwa Agent requires knowledge of all collector addresses, hence the initial deployment complexity may be a little higher than scribe. The largest test for Chukwa deployment was 50 Chukwa collectors running on top of 100 dedicated hadoop nodes to process log files from a data center. (Which was decommissioned due to lack of log files) Base on my experience, a single collector with 8GB allocated RAM could handle all log files from 2000 hadoop nodes + System Metrics (top, df, sar, iostat, netstat, vmstat output). =20 Chukwa does not have a direct log file viewer, instead, it has an analytics engine which computes various facts and provide reports. There are frequen= t requests about log file viewer but it hasn't been implemented. We only hav= e command line utility to dump the log files because it is difficult to view terabytes of log file. At some point in the future, when a full body index engine is implemented, then we will provide log file search. In essence, it depends on what you are looking for. If you are looking for simple log collection and viewer, Scribe is probably a good tool. If you are looking for log collection and reporting platform, Chukwa is a good solution. Regards, Eric On 11/30/09 11:54 AM, "Kim Vogt" wrote: > Hi, >=20 > My team is looking into using Scribe or Chukwa for hadoop log collection.= I > was wondering if anyone had any opinions about one vs. the other? I > apologize if this topic was covered before, but I don=B9t see a link to the > archives for this mailing list. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Kim From general-return-2465-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 01:58:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91363 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 01:58:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 01:58:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 46168 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 01:58:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46088 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 01:58:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46070 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 01:58:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:58:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:58:12 +0000 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so121569ywo.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:57:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iSPS4pbfI/YMu26oZPgekqKJJyLAJPlttSSQ0r5WRBs=; b=wr5AMMGQ7lN54sMx22sA0oJqgVh85/u/KugvQOsur5y7CjG6JRq/xDmIM/E+Putp8i 0oXHDtQvH5d+whFunQJTsbyasNWGnyFB11MYKxReICbgzJ1PbbQ79jptfnELJAfB5Wfd mAmiZtwFky5AqkEe/MM3wlkrtEGc09HOtAjE8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QNIIKUj0YGg+KAT8Q7q6skKdLymR8ugJMwoW/0tK2HrzhdLhT5N36DB8lA7C8ReLy6 OmZaWWA1lshwIrf6gaUPj98aVILOxdzf0CMqRwecOyyoKHU+f7j4+hJm1yPbXhYLZxKy spMI63QPF4+Ti8gGKtc4iRnj+pOb8XDQnYLc8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.158.2 with SMTP id g2mr13839477ybe.187.1291168670744; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.180 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:57:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:57:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd59e76f7033b04964fa1c3 --000e0cd59e76f7033b04964fa1c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This sounds like an important issue. But I personally don't understand what exactly the controversy is, and therefore what is this vote about, and what are the choices, if any. What I understand is that the issue spans over at least two (long) issues and different discussion threads. Could somebody knowledgeable make an independent digest of what is going on and how it stands. I am probably not alone who struggles with this. Is there a simple answer, like "you vetoed yesterday - now it's my turn" or "Avro should/not hold the monopoly for Hadoop serialization"? These were just humorous examples. Thanks, --Konstantin On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Based on the discussion on HADOOP-6685, there is a pretty fundamental > difference of opinion about how Hadoop should evolve. We need to figure out > how the majority of the PMC wants the project to evolve to understand which > patches move us forward. Please vote whether you approve of the following > direction. Clearly as the author, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > > Hadoop has always included library code so that users had a strong > foundation to build their applications on without needing to continually > reinvent the wheel. This combination of framework and powerful library code > is a common pattern for successful projects, such as Java, Lucene, etc. > Toward that end, we need to continue to extend the Hadoop library code and > actively maintain it as the framework evolves. Continuing support for > SequenceFile and TFile, which are both widely used is mandatory. The > opposite pattern of implementing the framework and letting each distribution > add the required libraries will lead to increased community fragmentation > and vendor lock in. > > Hadoop's generic serialization framework had a lot of promise when it was > introduced, but has been hampered by a lack of plugins other than Writables > and Java serialization. Supporting a wide range of serializations natively > in Hadoop will give the users new capabilities. Currently, to support Avro > or ProtoBuf objects mutually incompatible third party solutions are > required. It benefits Hadoop to support them with a common framework that > will support all of them. In particular, having easy, out of the box support > for Thrift, ProtoBufs, Avro, and our legacy serializations is a desired > state. > > As a distributed system, there are many instances where Hadoop needs to > serialize data. Many of those applications need a lightweight, versioned > serialization framework like ProtocolBuffers or Thrift and using them is > appropriate. Adding dependences on Thrift and ProtocolBuffers to the > previous dependence on Avro is acceptable. --000e0cd59e76f7033b04964fa1c3-- From general-return-2466-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 12:26:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75276 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 12:26:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 12:26:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 31939 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 12:26:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31702 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 12:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31694 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 12:26:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF72B7E0A for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:26:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rIJjh+Io2+lA for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:26:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8032CB7E09 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:26:11 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1291811157.3476@CsvElZUJOaIralffvs9nOQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oB1CPu1A006711 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:25:56 GMT Message-ID: <4CF63ED4.2000802@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:25:56 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oB1CPu1A006711 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 29/11/10 22:30, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Based on the discussion on HADOOP-6685, there is a pretty fundamental > difference of opinion about how Hadoop should evolve. We need to figure > out how the majority of the PMC wants the project to evolve to > understand which patches move us forward. Please vote whether you > approve of the following direction. Clearly as the author, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > > Hadoop has always included library code so that users had a strong > foundation to build their applications on without needing to continually > reinvent the wheel. This combination of framework and powerful library > code is a common pattern for successful projects, such as Java, Lucene, > etc. Toward that end, we need to continue to extend the Hadoop library > code and actively maintain it as the framework evolves. Continuing > support for SequenceFile and TFile, which are both widely used is > mandatory. The opposite pattern of implementing the framework and > letting each distribution add the required libraries will lead to > increased community fragmentation and vendor lock in. > > Hadoop's generic serialization framework had a lot of promise when it > was introduced, but has been hampered by a lack of plugins other than > Writables and Java serialization. Supporting a wide range of > serializations natively in Hadoop will give the users new capabilities. > Currently, to support Avro or ProtoBuf objects mutually incompatible > third party solutions are required. It benefits Hadoop to support them > with a common framework that will support all of them. In particular, > having easy, out of the box support for Thrift, ProtoBufs, Avro, and our > legacy serializations is a desired state. > > As a distributed system, there are many instances where Hadoop needs to > serialize data. Many of those applications need a lightweight, versioned > serialization framework like ProtocolBuffers or Thrift and using them is > appropriate. Adding dependences on Thrift and ProtocolBuffers to the > previous dependence on Avro is acceptable. I'm happy with new build-time dependencies on these libraries, with one big warning. Until an official, non-incubation release of Thrift comes out (and thrift moves from incubation), the Apache Management will veto any redistribution of the thrift JARs; they aren't signed off as for public use. I'm not so sure about more runtime depencencies that go all the way into the classpath of the things working with HDFS, or files created in it, because that leads to version problems in private code. [Inevitably Hadoop will end up adopting for some OSGi-like classpath setup, but I'm not pushing for that as it has its own interesting issues]. At the same time -you can't add features without adding dependencies except by playing rebasing tricks, and I have mixed feelings about those tricks: good: lets the hadoop team push things out on their schedule bad: impossible to push out security bug fixes to dependent libraries without rebuilding and re-releasing things. Your ops team will hate you. For the bad reason, and because it's extra work, I avoid playing rebasing games, just try and do classpaths right in the first place -which is easier said than done. One part of the HADOOP-6685 discussion raised was JSON as a format for things. Adopting JSON -and deciding which JSON parser to use- is trouble. Ignoring the ongoing discussion of serialization formats, the question "should we use JSON?" really leads back to "which external JSON parser do we want to use?", which is a separate -and significant problem. I say this as someone who has three separate json parsers on the runtime classpath of something whose functional tests are failing in a hudson window blinking at me alongside this email application. gson: http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.code.gson/gson/1.4 com.google.code.gson/gson-1.5.1; no runtime dependencies -some people like the seamless binding to java objects, which I view as repeating the same mistakes as WS-*. json-lib: http://json-lib.sourceforge.net/ http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/net.sf.json-lib/json-lib/2.3 at runtime tends to need the usual commons-logging back end and net.sf.json-lib/json-lib-2.3 net.sf.ezmorph/ezmorph-1.06 commons-lang-2.4 commons-collections-3.2.1 -low level, DOM-ish, could be improved to be more Java-5-intuitive Jackson: http://jackson.codehaus.org org.codehaus.jackson/jackson-core-asl-1.6.2 org.codehaus.jackson/jackson-asl/0.9.5 Now, before someone points out that three JSON parsers is too many, this same code has log4J, SLF4J (with a back end to JSCL), a patched back end logger for Jetty to avoid SLF4J where possible, and a custom JCL back-end. XML side there's xerces and xalan instead of the JVM versions, and hibernate pulling in dom4j alongside. Test runs add htlmunit to the classpath, which pulls in the older httpclient libs, along with the http-core stuff I've switched to. Java library versions -while more manageable than native library versions- are a pain. Regardless of the ugliness of XML or the mediocrity of DOM, running over to JSON just because DOM is unwieldy is replacing one source of trouble for another. If Hadoop is going to use JSON in places, then the discussion/decision about which JSON parser to stick on the classpath is worthy of a JIRA issue all of its own. -steve (returning to his failing tests) From general-return-2467-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 15:22:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48679 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 15:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 15:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 37981 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 15:22:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37624 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 15:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37614 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 15:22:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:22:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:22:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 48569 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 15:21:58 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.43.54]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:21:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:21:54 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/29/2010 04:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >Using a vote to > decide on project direction is far better than vetoing patches based on > disjoint visions of how to move forward. If the project votes for a > direction, a veto that is based on an opposing direction is clearly invalid. This is unfortunately not the way Apache projects operate. Vetos are not overridden by a majority votes. > For example, in your last MapReduce (MAPREDUCE-980) patch you > added avro and paranamer as dependences. If I'm not mistaken, that only adds a dependency to the JobTracker. We don't create specific classpaths for daemons than for user code, but we probably should, so that things that only the daemon uses are not also placed on the users classpath. Doug From general-return-2468-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 15:40:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54114 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 15:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 15:40:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 74592 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 15:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74503 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 15:40:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74492 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 15:40:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:40:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:40:25 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id do0m1f0031swQuc57rg66N; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:40:06 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id drg41f00P1GAoR63brg5hw; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:40:05 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:40:03 -0800 References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 1, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 11/29/2010 04:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Using a vote to >> decide on project direction is far better than vetoing patches >> based on >> disjoint visions of how to move forward. If the project votes for a >> direction, a veto that is based on an opposing direction is clearly >> invalid. > > This is unfortunately not the way Apache projects operate. Vetos > are not overridden by a majority votes. This isn't overriding the veto. You've based your veto on changes in project plan that have never been discussed or agreed to. At Ian's suggestion, I wrote my statement to clarify what the project wanted to do. It is completely appropriate for the PMC to vote about what the project should do going forward. I would hope that if the PMC votes for my proposal that you'd withdraw your veto since the basis for your veto would have been rejected. -- Owen From general-return-2469-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 16:29:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78992 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 16:29:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 16:29:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 82856 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 16:29:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82585 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 16:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82572 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 16:29:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:29:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:29:30 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1743529qwj.35 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5CSCbJKJUXA8hvAIl7t/DP61jX//njBTOE1a5gyW7dM=; b=m7fpcS0BP1gIc9RgM3lZAS+3AjHRdq4KQx8kGsOKYwCJkj0UqncVWYMOzsGSCibsLZ fUq1aRIB9e9cpJuWzKCFOclZwCU1/iWfjWKqmNq+i4Zx8hDwTgF//xwX+2QTzlnDvZEQ XzztVehFU4hF07uVHlSVHrcvJaCQ3tLies60w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CaDlanL1C94ClWf4e3Wpn/s3ZN28alyddB+JiWYwGHnvm13SjYgzNvETUlnxP6prkY wBC3N6Pj9uoUQEoLnCdI1UNXhHs5qbRaRWy0LSGdYZm/aaTy8UZFSfH5Q1PaKFdMlvlG DPCSXt1ZzBi2oGy5IGYloz1hNFlhOmS2E3Nys= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.2.70 with SMTP id 6mr1749532qai.83.1291220949582; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.159.136 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:29:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:29:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175caaae06c50904965bcea0 --0015175caaae06c50904965bcea0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > For example, in your last MapReduce (MAPREDUCE-980) patch you >> added avro and paranamer as dependences. >> > > If I'm not mistaken, that only adds a dependency to the JobTracker. We > don't create specific classpaths for daemons than for user code, but we > probably should, so that things that only the daemon uses are not also > placed on the users classpath. > > +1 to separate classpaths for daemons as an eventual goal. As a user, I've definitely lost an afternoon to commons-lang version mismatches. If we can add fewer things to the Task classpath, that's fewer potential future lost afternoons. I'm not a PMC member, but I suspect I spend more time doing user-level grunt work than many PMC members, so from that perspective: On internal-to-hadoop serialization: I'm going to spend 99% of my time not caring about these formats and the other 1% of the time needing to know what's going on with them *immediately*. Right now I know nothing about protobuf.. learning new things is always great but "while my production job is broken and I'm trying to debug it" isn't really going to be the best time and place for it. JSON on the other hand is human readable and never going to change. I feel a lot safer with JSON than with any binary format, especially considering that we could all be using NewHawtUnforeseenLibrary or IncompatibleWithPreviousReleaseLibrary for our binary serialization in a couple years. On packaging serialization lib dependencies: Again, additional versioned dependencies on the Task classpath scare me, and that goes double for serialization. I could see a couple ways around it that fall prey to the inner-framework antipattern, and for what it's worth, I'd be willing to accept that additional kludginess if it meant that I wasn't strictly dependent on avro x.x or thrift y.y. What if I'm reading a file that was encoded with an incompatible version? This gets way out of scope from the immediate issue but if I could ship my own serialization library in an assembly jar, and maybe override an additional method or supply a MapOutputEncoder or something, I'd take that tradeoff over being bound to a particular version until the next version of Hadoop comes out. If there were sensible defaults in place, it might not even mean more complexity for the average job. --0015175caaae06c50904965bcea0-- From general-return-2470-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 17:35:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16471 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 17:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 17:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 45400 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 17:35:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45343 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 17:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45335 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 17:35:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:35:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:35:51 +0000 Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so293058wwb.29 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wLGqONK9Cufc6eS7IgWKWqcqTvqG4UwPcJzEyyJli2Y=; b=xL3ZckRKdxtCMdRllDg5lW4GLEVEAzBt6iUPCW4LrZIFr9owO9+iHuPxRz7UTTiyGM ObH97aSp//BqL4RdlgQYEHhTqyRXYQ33CXmjyX4ogls6Ok6lsUpxkZMzeJbx2ZsBCq0B TfZEMnGB4b8Nbzyj5wiF58H3vST5CPFZAhcVg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j9pfOW3cTJvg+mlFVn52INqrLbfJWkfzdrJgo1Nt9fhidQJ2qqYoCd8rt8Uz71sSGd 6IKZQ3RqeB1zRtEZuun7Ysz7vH5HpsktQ4eOMEvHGwIkMxmLXg9tKSEp7EVjJdyShcLe xpSzrj09DOswncPkC63uV/JKSesF/Zo/EOywc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.144.65 with SMTP id y1mr9746419wbu.199.1291224929297; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.196.135 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:35:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:35:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago Hadoop User Group December Meetup - Intro to HBase From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831b923cb0e504965cbbd2 --001636831b923cb0e504965cbbd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The next meeting of the Chicago area Hadoop User Group will be help next Wednesday, December 8th from 5:30-7:30PM, and will feature an introduction to HBase by Lars George of Cloudera. The meeting will be hosted by Navteq, located in the Boeing building at 425 W. Randolph Street in downtown Chicago. Slots are limited, so RSVP now. More details and RSVP here: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoop-User-Group-CHUG/calendar/15500107/ Hope to see you there! Jonathan --001636831b923cb0e504965cbbd2-- From general-return-2471-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 19:12:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73237 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 19:12:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 19:12:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 41028 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 19:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40800 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 19:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40792 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 19:12:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:12:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:12:15 +0000 Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dmuB1f0010Fqzac57vBvWD; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:11:55 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dvBj1f0052SbwD53UvBnwM; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:11:52 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-48--609110743 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:11:41 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-48--609110743 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > This sounds like an important issue. But I personally don't > understand what > exactly the controversy is, and therefore what is this vote about, > and what > are the choices, if any. The question is how the Hadoop project wants to move forward. It was motivated by Doug's veto of HADOOP-6685, which was based on his personal decisions about how the project should go forward and not on anything that had been decided by the PMC. These decisions are much more important to MapReduce, which is a framework, than HDFS which is a client/server model. 1. Should Hadoop include a user-facing library of useful code? There has been a suggestion that user-facing library code, such as SequenceFile, TFile, DistCp, etc. should be deprecated and that Hadoop should allow third party projects like Avro to supply the user-facing library code that makes Hadoop usable. I think it is critical that we keep those components as part of Hadoop and extend them as the framework evolves. Users depend heavily on SequenceFile for storing their data in Hadoop and they should not be deprecated as Doug has suggested. 2. Should MapReduce support non-Writables through the pipeline out of the box? There has also been a discussion about whether we should support non- Writables natively. There is already library code in Avro that lets users use Avro types in a custom MapReduce API. A general MapReduce API that encompasses all of the serialization frameworks and does not lock users into a particular one is much more powerful. Furthermore, making it convenient for the users, by including the plugins in the default configuration and class path, will enable the use of Avro, Thrift and ProtoBuf objects by people who would rather not focus on serialization. Avro and Writables should not be the only first class serializations that Hadoop supports by default. 3. Should a framework dependency on ProtoBuf be allowed? Doug has added several framework dependences on Avro. The question is whether it is acceptable to use the ProtoBuf library in the framework. Avro is good for uses where there are a lot of objects of the same type. ProtoBuf is better for small number of objects. The question is whether Avro, JSON, and XML should be the only serialization libraries that are acceptable to use in the framework. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-48--609110743-- From general-return-2472-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 01 22:38:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61758 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 22:38:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 22:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 31142 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 22:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31075 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 22:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31067 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 22:38:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:38:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:38:15 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so7312696bwz.35 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:37:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DrSsH9RiROEHc/qEVL8ZjdgRvMt2FosCpqBtP1mDhu4=; b=Eq0lblg8Jyt+RwfqLxEPk5YWLmcFiIYuxIsC+QQz8vm7eM9U/4Uomkc/mNR2q9V+Df CLnRa58QdHJHNGJcD/t5MATQnArb5w2eUS7EB/iBoPyJrzBdDkRuXADYhWCxUV9tNPFE 8/v8OUIjqIuaNXiT0GYACGOW+KKLZoWWkwdKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xiv6JxYF9SZEzNhk/jQj5Kx8fzbJ0OGBPapD3qL1+frQj3GOlAKn1vn8EDjjDlQ6lE iL261wQAl0emlbE9f4RWMSA8bKZpnw9alcMRuXiygSLOr9z3fa7OtkufKpfEb5fn0Zwf lyOTeLKBWZkhazMxquj8T4xqKHF+KjzQxiZi8= Received: by 10.204.118.7 with SMTP id t7mr1872690bkq.97.1291243074764; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:37:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.99.69 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:37:34 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:37:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Announcing the first San Francisco Hadoop meetup -- Jan 12, 2011 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop fans, Earlier in the month I proposed a San Francisco-based Hadoop meetup. We are pleased to announce that we will be holding this event on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 from 6pm to 8pm. Rapleaf has graciously offered to host the event in their SF office at 3rd and Mission (667 Mission St., 4th Floor). We are=A0also thankful to Cloudera, who will be helping to sponsor the event. As mentioned in the initial proposal, the format of this event will be different than the presentation-based HUG; there will not be prepared lectures. Instead, all participants are asked to discuss their usage of, or questions about Hadoop. =A0Please come prepared to introduce yourself and provide a one--two minute summary of=A0what you're working on with=A0Hadoop, areas you're interested in learning more about, and/or challenges that you're facing that might be addressed by a larger Hadoop community.=A0All are welcome (developers, users, or=A0managers; experienced or newbies). Based on the common themes that arise, we will break into smaller groups to discuss these in greater depth. Several experienced Hadoopers will be on hand to help moderate small group discussions. Agenda: 6pm - Socializing 6:30pm - Introductions, overview 7pm - Breakout sessions begin 8pm - Conclusion I hope to see many of you there! The space available has a limit of 40 participants; please RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/calendar/15601471/. The meeting invitation is hosted at=A0http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf=A0-- please sign up for this meetup group to get information about future meetups. Based on the success of the initial event, we hope to hold more of these in the future. Regards, - Aaron Kimball From general-return-2473-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 02 05:24:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33226 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2010 05:24:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Dec 2010 05:24:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 64545 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 05:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64346 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 05:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64338 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2010 05:24:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of prashantsethia007@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:24:28 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2427402qwj.35 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ime1372bSJDY3esQRaOpss4slFTqZPiPP95CeWlg8A0=; b=U66q9K8iNlZYjpMlJ5D+q6HJmU4l+TxGee87rkxuEWV6QhEQOFMj1oZXaSwOALRzsH dYZiMYVvqz37OBfwYWUTAYI88MD8WdRo7tarRCp8mB3PSrxtCwBBeWGLrNjHKQ0dgsWB Vr3G/csRmB/ZMM12TpVrnmNIMQzuYs5RXk+7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aK5LQ/i3Seo/l7FTGIt7QSDztHlfwwb+azrwxwZY3t+m2A1CFDkZ0Y31N6mdfGxDlZ YbpnBfWmxb6sz9uU57NF7SAXef0BvgXuWBPb8I977oAMj9dNkAcllIlVa4xNQVVaM35z OgJxzQV6MnKNm1a+BIpjQC/qGr+wqAVM9etaQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.250.130 with SMTP id mo2mr8151712qcb.126.1291267447180; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.44.74 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:24:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:24:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Shuffle Error: Exceeded MAX_FAILED_UNIQUE_FETCHES; bailing-out. From: prashant sethia To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b804c7fcd85049666a18d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b804c7fcd85049666a18d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I have installed Hadoop 0.20.2 on a cluster of 6 computers. Everything runs fine when I run an application on Hadoop with one system in the cluster. But as soon as I include more than one system and then run a job, I get the following error after completion of the map task: Shuffle Error: Exceeded MAX_FAILED_UNIQUE_FETCHES; bailing-out. The value of "ulimit -n" is set to 35000. I am not using any DNS names, so no DNS resolution problems. What can be the problem then? Same happens with Hadoop 0.21.0 version. Thanks, Prashant. --0016363b804c7fcd85049666a18d-- From general-return-2474-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 02 11:44:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79540 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2010 11:44:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Dec 2010 11:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 32956 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 11:44:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32537 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2010 11:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32529 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2010 11:44:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:44:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:44:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A001BA47A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:44:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id F+kX8ZFnfn-T for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:44:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8C21BA688 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:44:01 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1291895027.3617@awpVYkG7iL7tBMwjMAjQGw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oB2BhkTp002824 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:43:46 GMT Message-ID: <4CF78672.30800@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:43:46 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Shuffle Error: Exceeded MAX_FAILED_UNIQUE_FETCHES; bailing-out. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oB2BhkTp002824 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 02/12/10 05:24, prashant sethia wrote: > Shuffle Error: Exceeded MAX_FAILED_UNIQUE_FETCHES I don't know about other people's causes of this message, but searching for it throws up the only time I've seen it http://jira.smartfrog.org/jira/browse/SFOS-121 the mapred.task.tracker.http.address address was wrong. If your route cause is the same as mine, look at networking and hostname settings, both /etc/hosts and the config files of the services From general-return-2475-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 17:16:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20770 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 17:16:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 17:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 93522 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 17:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93411 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 17:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93403 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 17:16:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:16:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:16:37 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] (tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.120.91]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id oB6HG08l066451 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:16:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291655760; bh=pjSOqvfUNNkdgWOcoPhfV5afu25vNGjaw98LrDoGDoE=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=sLUdOB/TKwAarTkU/l7yd+i/BHx+/tjTbtGNyTrr56QDuYuSQw3saEVx7C3ArB9f9 MAZKp6qNmal/zWENTuK+FmszjxNXm6ah4UftH6mfu9YTZ0swphEYu+uFedTwM880My cdP1ZlRmMQ1WtrWNFyQsa6HOiMnZIQlZOCJwkIf8= Message-Id: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-56--184051914 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:16:00 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-56--184051914 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: All, We really need some guidance on the general direction for the project. Please comment and/or vote. If no one cares, then I'll probably commit it to Yahoo's internal branch. -- Owen > The question is how the Hadoop project wants to move forward. > > It was motivated by Doug's veto of HADOOP-6685, which was based on > his personal decisions about how the project should go forward and > not on anything that had been decided by the PMC. > > These decisions are much more important to MapReduce, which is a > framework, than HDFS which is a client/server model. > > 1. Should Hadoop include a user-facing library of useful code? > > There has been a suggestion that user-facing library code, such as > SequenceFile, TFile, DistCp, etc. should be deprecated and that > Hadoop should allow third party projects like Avro to supply the > user-facing library code that makes Hadoop usable. I think it is > critical that we keep those components as part of Hadoop and extend > them as the framework evolves. Users depend heavily on SequenceFile > for storing their data in Hadoop and they should not be deprecated > as Doug has suggested. > > 2. Should MapReduce support non-Writables through the pipeline out > of the box? > > There has also been a discussion about whether we should support non- > Writables natively. There is already library code in Avro that lets > users use Avro types in a custom MapReduce API. A general MapReduce > API that encompasses all of the serialization frameworks and does > not lock users into a particular one is much more powerful. > > Furthermore, making it convenient for the users, by including the > plugins in the default configuration and class path, will enable the > use of Avro, Thrift and ProtoBuf objects by people who would rather > not focus on serialization. Avro and Writables should not be the > only first class serializations that Hadoop supports by default. > > 3. Should a framework dependency on ProtoBuf be allowed? > > Doug has added several framework dependences on Avro. The question > is whether it is acceptable to use the ProtoBuf library in the > framework. Avro is good for uses where there are a lot of objects of > the same type. ProtoBuf is better for small number of objects. The > question is whether Avro, JSON, and XML should be the only > serialization libraries that are acceptable to use in the framework. --Apple-Mail-56--184051914-- From general-return-2476-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 17:51:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31266 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 17:51:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 17:51:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 42801 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 17:51:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42433 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 17:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42418 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 17:51:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:51:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:50:55 +0000 Received: from phobos.cz.avg.com (phobos.cz.avg.com [192.168.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFFF38969; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:50:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by phobos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:50:33 +0100 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:50:31 -0500 From: Deepika Khera To: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:50:30 -0500 Subject: distcp fails with ConnectException Thread-Topic: distcp fails with ConnectException Thread-Index: AcuVbhL0oXWtRiapTAGklUVhrb6WIw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD1506207CABCB0miranda_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD1506207CABCB0miranda_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am trying to run distcp between 2 hdfs clusters and I am getting a Conne= ctException . The Command I am trying to run is of the form (considering clusters hadoop-= A & hadoop-B): ./hadoop distcp -update hdfs://hadoop-A:8020/dira/part-r-00000 hdfs://hadoo= p-B:8020/dirb/ and I am running it on the destination cluster (hadoop-B). The stacktrace for the exception is : Copy failed: java.net.ConnectException: Call to hadoop-A/10.0.173.11:8020 f= ailed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refuse= d at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.jav= a:113) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:214) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:177) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(Distribu= tedFileSystem.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java= :1378) I have tried ping and ssh in between these clusters and it is working fine.= On both clusters namenode is running as the same user. The strange part is if I try the command on a single cluster (both source &= destination are on same DFS- so its a simple copy), it still fails with t= he same exception. So I mean I run the command below on cluster A. ./hadoop distcp -update hdfs://hadoop-A:8020/dir1/part-r-00000 hdfs://hadoo= p-A:8020/dir2/ Is there anything else I need to have to get the distcp working? Any hints= on what I could check will be helpful. Thanks, Deepika --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD1506207CABCB0miranda_-- From general-return-2477-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 18:41:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66805 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 18:41:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 18:41:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27208 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 18:41:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27158 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 18:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27150 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 18:41:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:41:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:41:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 66714 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 18:40:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:40:39 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so7220333gyf.35 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:40:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.34.139 with SMTP id l11mr6276932ibd.141.1291660837452; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:40:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:40:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org SequenceFile is an experimental file format; as long as it continues to support existing data, I see no reason to block its continued evolution. TFile is also part of the common project. The project could support still more, provided the tools and documentation were available to help users select the one that fits their use case. This question is backwards. If the assertion is that a part of the framework's development should be arrested, that claim requires a discussion and vote. The PMC should not have to weigh in on allowing code to change. -C On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > =A0 We really need some guidance on the general direction for the project= . > Please comment and/or vote. If no one cares, then I'll probably commit it= to > Yahoo's internal branch. > > -- Owen > >> The question is how the Hadoop project wants to move forward. >> >> It was motivated by Doug's veto of HADOOP-6685, which was based on his >> personal decisions about how the project should go forward and not on >> anything that had been decided by the PMC. >> >> These decisions are much more important to MapReduce, which is a >> framework, than HDFS which is a client/server model. >> >> 1. Should Hadoop include a user-facing library of useful code? >> >> There has been a suggestion that user-facing library code, such as >> SequenceFile, TFile, DistCp, etc. should be deprecated and that Hadoop >> should allow third party projects like Avro to supply the user-facing >> library code that makes Hadoop usable. I think it is critical that we ke= ep >> those components as part of Hadoop and extend them as the framework evol= ves. >> Users depend heavily on SequenceFile for storing their data in Hadoop an= d >> they should not =A0be deprecated as Doug has suggested. >> >> 2. Should MapReduce support non-Writables through the pipeline out of th= e >> box? >> >> There has also been a discussion about whether we should support >> non-Writables natively. There is already library code in Avro that lets >> users use Avro types in a custom MapReduce API. A general MapReduce API = that >> encompasses all of the serialization frameworks and does not lock users = into >> a particular one is much more powerful. >> >> Furthermore, making it convenient for the users, by including the plugin= s >> in the default configuration and class path, will enable the use of Avro= , >> Thrift and ProtoBuf objects by people who would rather not focus on >> serialization. Avro and Writables should not be the only first class >> serializations that Hadoop supports by default. >> >> 3. Should a framework dependency on ProtoBuf be allowed? >> >> Doug has added several framework dependences on Avro. The question is >> whether it is acceptable to use the ProtoBuf library in the framework. A= vro >> is good for uses where there are a lot of objects of the same type. Prot= oBuf >> is better for small number of objects. The question is whether Avro, JSO= N, >> and XML should be the only serialization libraries that are acceptable t= o >> use in the framework. > > From general-return-2478-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 18:47:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69569 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 18:47:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 18:47:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 39523 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39472 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39464 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:47:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:47:52 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oB6IkXaR046827 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:46:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291661193; bh=0L7t0PEJ25c4CLNB2+yBGgQ10FKOQww0w55e7XNdAuk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=XHRdz3Usmi7YesNkh2gq7vRUQaN6EpPK2l8/iSi4o0bKWHp4jg5bRzPFsbAJY9TaK but5KzVShttsvNUeWrqri3pVi1odr0STjttxq4soef/HqziOpim1GqcXeFcC3E109J nB+TvuTRlA5Po3TO3MwyPAqHarHVTMXD4/IqHfec= Message-Id: <797F5D37-68A4-43DE-89CA-70C1A38B258B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-308--178619512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:46:32 -0800 References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-308--178619512 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > This question is backwards. If the assertion is that a part of the > framework's development should be arrested, that claim requires a > discussion and vote. The PMC should not have to weigh in on allowing > code to change. -C > Agreed. Arresting development on SequenceFile is preposterous. There are several petabytes of data sitting on it all over for several reasons, including legacy. Stopping development on it is unreasonable. Apache Hadoop is volunteer driven, volunteers should be allowed to contribute as they see fit. +1 Arun > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: >> >> On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> All, >> We really need some guidance on the general direction for the >> project. >> Please comment and/or vote. If no one cares, then I'll probably >> commit it to >> Yahoo's internal branch. >> >> -- Owen >> >>> The question is how the Hadoop project wants to move forward. >>> >>> It was motivated by Doug's veto of HADOOP-6685, which was based on >>> his >>> personal decisions about how the project should go forward and not >>> on >>> anything that had been decided by the PMC. >>> >>> These decisions are much more important to MapReduce, which is a >>> framework, than HDFS which is a client/server model. >>> >>> 1. Should Hadoop include a user-facing library of useful code? >>> >>> There has been a suggestion that user-facing library code, such as >>> SequenceFile, TFile, DistCp, etc. should be deprecated and that >>> Hadoop >>> should allow third party projects like Avro to supply the user- >>> facing >>> library code that makes Hadoop usable. I think it is critical that >>> we keep >>> those components as part of Hadoop and extend them as the >>> framework evolves. >>> Users depend heavily on SequenceFile for storing their data in >>> Hadoop and >>> they should not be deprecated as Doug has suggested. >>> >>> 2. Should MapReduce support non-Writables through the pipeline out >>> of the >>> box? >>> >>> There has also been a discussion about whether we should support >>> non-Writables natively. There is already library code in Avro that >>> lets >>> users use Avro types in a custom MapReduce API. A general >>> MapReduce API that >>> encompasses all of the serialization frameworks and does not lock >>> users into >>> a particular one is much more powerful. >>> >>> Furthermore, making it convenient for the users, by including the >>> plugins >>> in the default configuration and class path, will enable the use >>> of Avro, >>> Thrift and ProtoBuf objects by people who would rather not focus on >>> serialization. Avro and Writables should not be the only first class >>> serializations that Hadoop supports by default. >>> >>> 3. Should a framework dependency on ProtoBuf be allowed? >>> >>> Doug has added several framework dependences on Avro. The question >>> is >>> whether it is acceptable to use the ProtoBuf library in the >>> framework. Avro >>> is good for uses where there are a lot of objects of the same >>> type. ProtoBuf >>> is better for small number of objects. The question is whether >>> Avro, JSON, >>> and XML should be the only serialization libraries that are >>> acceptable to >>> use in the framework. >> >> --Apple-Mail-308--178619512-- From general-return-2479-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 19:30:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93101 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 19:30:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 19:30:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 7269 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 19:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7204 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 19:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7158 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 19:30:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:30:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 92766 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 19:30:05 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:30:05 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:30:04 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/01/2010 07:40 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> This is unfortunately not the way Apache projects operate. Vetos are >> not overridden by a majority votes. > > This isn't overriding the veto. You've based your veto on changes in > project plan that have never been discussed or agreed to. Apache projects don't have project plans that are created by majority votes. Have a look at, e.g.: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html Majority votes are only used for releases. Plans are announced to get feedback, to aid in consensus building. Doug From general-return-2480-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 21:15:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41600 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 21:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 21:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 91191 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 21:15:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91123 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 21:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91115 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 21:15:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.43] (HELO mail-ew0-f43.google.com) (209.85.215.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:15:08 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so8362704ewy.2 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:14:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FjjavxEiEKtbCRdIK1c5nqAvYQkxMSJhTLX5PoxNJQg=; b=gbBKvsQU0f5dCIDyEg9g91OWMg300uZtEpJkryigwTJ42NTdndzjXCcGWi05glUeUw 5ttxDEOHN2O06Kl8HNYV3OOV0B/p7z1iLMr4PleicD1Pv/ngbFXyL1kJyUMV44ZPjMjk Zmyqr6ISuV3X1sKcMbjc0vqxjFDQd2A2gEChE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZBDPzRcxitpqhuxU2Le0bZ5QS7mGzMGiGzxTrZRPcane+MWJwTBSbviC2cXL6c3moi CDCZYzkb9+qINPm5/gb3LBM3RAXP6pcvonBsRvlnDO1pvDLTklbQVK4l9McWeD8MzA6q tX//cMkRA4kpkZbn+QKIOaEDc2meaP4lRv8Ks= Received: by 10.216.208.230 with SMTP id q80mr518964weo.103.1291670087617; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:14:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.19.193 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:14:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> From: Tom White Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:14:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > =A0 We really need some guidance on the general direction for the project= . > Please comment and/or vote. If no one cares, then I'll probably commit it= to > Yahoo's internal branch. > An alternative to this would be to create a project for serializations. Other projects have successfully provided external libraries for Hadoop, e.g. Pig, Hive, Elephant Bird, Plume, Cascading, Mahout etc. This would make it possible for users to choose which library they wanted to use, and allows updates to the library to be driven by the library's release schedule, not Hadoop's. Tom From general-return-2481-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 22:41:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80452 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 22:41:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 22:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 34743 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 22:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34612 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 22:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34604 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 22:41:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:41:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:41:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 80335 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 22:40:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:40:55 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so176206ywo.35 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:40:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.206.143 with SMTP id fu15mr541048ibb.191.1291675254454; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:40:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:40:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/01/2010 07:40 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> This is unfortunately not the way Apache projects operate. Vetos are >>> not overridden by a majority votes. >> >> This isn't overriding the veto. You've based your veto on changes in >> project plan that have never been discussed or agreed to. > > Apache projects don't have project plans that are created by majority votes. This reasoning is exactly opposite the facts at issue. The veto of HADOOP-6685 was based, in part, on a component that the patch proposed to modify. Due to an individual's project plan- one that "does not support" extending that component- that change was not allowed to go forward. Asserting that the PMC does not create project plans by majority vote is correct in some ways; the PMC does not plan out every feature and pre-approve all work contributed in a release. This does not require that its members remain collectively mute on the project's direction. It is nonsense to assert that every PMC member has the right to block work because it conflicts with their personal vision for Hadoop. That doesn't scale. Instead, it makes authority so ambiguous and diffuse that project direction defaults to the agenda of bullies. This has been turned on its head. The procedural question is whether individual votes establish project plans, not majority votes. To avoid a pedantic, lawyerly debate on whether this aspect of the veto was valid, its premise was raised as an issue for the community, so it could reach consensus and define the scope of its project. This approach was supposed to incite more constructive debate on an obvious difference in how participants see Hadoop development over the long term. So do you want to have that discussion, or do you want to bicker about whether you'll be forced to accept the result? -C On the vote: I'm +1 on supporting library/platform code in the Hadoop project, particularly in MapReduce. Reducing MR to a distributed sort implementation is not a direction I'm interested in. From general-return-2482-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 23:44:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13622 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 23:44:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 23:44:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 15656 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 23:44:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15608 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 23:44:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15600 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 23:44:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:44:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.69.21] (HELO web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.69.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:44:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 14576 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Dec 2010 23:44:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291679057; bh=cVId71CVy3v0qRubjPXTyl8HU3OKNhfIWnSDqegbQVo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ChQ2sXvIfqnjqLgs++2AoSi1yQHS5nRacmR9v9hVZt04Jff74OkqnPE2rJip5THpvVVOGqTgEf0J+h7O0Fe9+TML/XSrz+vXGPf+zF1OAEGzoyS+2oW6Il7DflNNpLjZSppG2AtarK8fKDoF7VzVib2wGVUkBvFGgVgJQFDn3YQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fGREJZVVqLXhpKNkiYiPDoso5ktZOHru4YdOWnut5pqAco0rjWsASGMySm9vgu1j15cDB1nEMXCzSeD5NvhEzHyv1W/Sqzfrwc2JUMHVy12gbOFR++rrI4P1VUOWGCEMc0vQKivSsmzsykNXPQ/Wfo+TLESS8/f1lKTyy8tijx0=; Message-ID: <940252.13484.qm@web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: JdOkZpAVM1k7SU6P4gJFQEmaQNraaEp0HdOVG8TxFs2H4dG hN9jw0POY_5o5D_QOpBB6xA602JEJ3OUUGxzL6XDoZZS5hhptVnU3oj3DQqu RTnlLteFY35LQCPcPvDCiIzrgDtyNE7tb82v2.grFS56XpbY0jHQO158a9aS GQK6zI2aXS0vmHSAXqMybuM6LgdwR6HV8JipxkUVuWWrOZKB68DdPrh.CicV 3e3yXfPKlZBwAeZIHe8yUd5xn2qYyltdVJ78B6WX5QOS_LG1F2Ax857z5GKg hl6ZC3UgH2YvK9j6xzdPztb6f35E51KCbUYWPL.YkHL7kJn7Q4SsgvR9IGjd 2ZEUl8f3c8yWM_LUFrX_AjmYMu34GJvIosFjMWRz0QrYc.BnRegEngVYIBSW vG00- Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:44:17 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:44:17 -0800 (PST) From: Debabrata Biswas Subject: Re: distcp fails with ConnectException To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [I use 'gridops' : you could use any valid queue name]. =0APlease try with = this.=0Ahadoop distcp -Dmapred.job.queue.name=3Dgridops -m 3 -i -ppgu hdfs= ://hadoop-A:8020/dir1/part-r-00000 hdfs://hadoop-A:8020/dir2/=0A=0AThanks,= =0A-Deb=0A=0A--- On Mon, 12/6/10, Deepika Khera wro= te:=0A=0A> From: Deepika Khera =0A> Subject: distcp = fails with ConnectException=0A> To: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" =0A> Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 9:50 AM=0A> I am trying to= run distcp between=0A> 2=A0 hdfs clusters and I am getting a ConnectExcept= ion .=0A> =0A> The Command I am trying to run is of the form (considering= =0A> clusters hadoop-A & hadoop-B):=0A> =0A> ./hadoop distcp -update=0A> hd= fs://hadoop-A:8020/dira/part-r-00000=0A> hdfs://hadoop-B:8020/dirb/=0A> =0A= > and I am running it on the destination cluster (hadoop-B).=0A> =0A> The s= tacktrace for the exception is :=0A> =0A> Copy failed: java.net.ConnectExce= ption: Call to=0A> hadoop-A/10.0.173.11:8020 failed on connection exception= :=0A> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at= =0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:767)=0A> =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:743)=0A> = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:22= 0)=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> $Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)=0A= > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:359)= =0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamen= ode(DFSClient.java:113)=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.D= FSClient.(DFSClient.java:214)=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.h= adoop.hdfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:177)=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> = org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSyst= em.java:82)=0A> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at=0A> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.crea= teFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1378)=0A> =0A> =0A> I have tried ping and ssh = in between these clusters and it=0A> is working fine. On both clusters name= node is running as the=0A> same user.=0A> =0A> The strange part is if I try= the command on a single=0A> cluster (both source & destination are on same= =0A> DFS-=A0 so its a simple copy), it still fails with the=0A> same except= ion. So I mean I run the command below on cluster=0A> A.=0A> =0A> ./hadoop = distcp -update=0A> hdfs://hadoop-A:8020/dir1/part-r-00000=0A> hdfs://hadoop= -A:8020/dir2/=0A> =0A> Is there anything else I need to have to get the dis= tcp=0A> working?=A0 Any hints on what I could check will be=0A> helpful.=0A= > =0A> Thanks,=0A> Deepika=0A> =0A> =0A=0A=0A From general-return-2483-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 06 23:45:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14140 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 23:45:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2010 23:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 18559 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 23:45:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18483 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2010 23:45:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18444 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 23:45:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:45:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:45:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 13821 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2010 23:45:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:45:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:45:09 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/06/2010 02:40 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > It is nonsense to assert that every PMC member has the right to block > work because it conflicts with their personal vision [ ... ] This is the way Apache projects operate. It requires that folks listen to criticism and potentially accept compromises if they wish to make progress. If folks cannot reach consensus in an area then that area will not make progress. > On the vote: I'm +1 on supporting library/platform code in the Hadoop > project, particularly in MapReduce. Reducing MR to a distributed sort > implementation is not a direction I'm interested in. I am interested in having this project primarily deliver a reliable, efficient MapReduce kernel implementation. That's the core functionality that folks seek to not recreate. The project should focus on a minimal, low-level MapReduce API for this kernel and permit other projects to build higher-level abstractions. Doug From general-return-2484-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 01:10:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67226 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 01:10:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 01:10:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 99076 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 01:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98908 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 01:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98900 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 01:10:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.119] (HELO homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:10:02 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14B96D406D for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:09:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=Zjuq4Gh5SlqxDtsUt4zpjV/hLwT93WmNKxiAFqjzr21+BrIB/F/M +2brXXB8LZAJjIYUPxd/BIiPs1R7pJw/yXOiJdP+0oC3R3T0BV+M+SNJE50a+Oqj yyrj10DoJmha1HeG09IMNV30d0mvq5L3NxMoWutMg27O2aR8IrERuoo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=LgIkuB11d0FzrFSdRgOt1jimh9o=; b=CWuY41Zv84c3IfE97eSQel8IKTYG qW+wcEoaxdVWd0sNC3UXaUm8cwklcRr3ZKkMRHm9CfBCM+I9SaNt0MGen08NIsdb y2PnJ6wtyVv3zro5f0MkqadPBPZadtHh/GxMc6X00VczvCSLK6Fygcu7WiwnVPNw JW2WKbAlqbJqJXQ= Received: from di-524.corp.day.com (wsip-98-189-13-228.oc.oc.cox.net [98.189.13.228]) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7BCD16D405E for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:09:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:09:41 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/06/2010 02:40 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> It is nonsense to assert that every PMC member has the right to block >> work because it conflicts with their personal vision [ ... ] >=20 > This is the way Apache projects operate. It requires that folks = listen to criticism and potentially accept compromises if they wish to = make progress. If folks cannot reach consensus in an area then that = area will not make progress. Generally speaking, vetoing extension interfaces without a compelling technical reason is not the way Apache operates. We make extensions modular so that diverse collaborators can specialize according to their own needs, not just your needs. The compelling reason would be a measured performance impact or some other objective degradation of the existing product that can be evaluated by others as a cost/benefit tradeoff and perhaps compensated by modifying the implementation. >> On the vote: I'm +1 on supporting library/platform code in the Hadoop >> project, particularly in MapReduce. Reducing MR to a distributed sort >> implementation is not a direction I'm interested in. >=20 > I am interested in having this project primarily deliver a reliable, = efficient MapReduce kernel implementation. That's the core = functionality that folks seek to not recreate. The project should focus = on a minimal, low-level MapReduce API for this kernel and permit other = projects to build higher-level abstractions. That is something people can vote on. Changes to the existing products, including plans like the one Owen described, are subject to vote if = anyone disagrees with them. They are also subject to veto if and only if they are to be applied to the current release branch (or a released branch). If a PMC member insists on making design opinion the sole basis of their vetoes, then they are not collaborating with the rest of the PMC. The board will recommend that such a person be removed from the PMC so that the majority can continue to develop the product in peace. If there is enough interest in a parallel line of development, then the board will recommend splitting the PMC into two or more projects that can compete on the merits of their own designs, with the existing product name remaining with the majority. Both recommendations are based on our experience with Tomcat (which quickly solved the disagreement on its own, once the choices were laid out, by allowing divergent designs on separate major versions of the same product). ....Roy From general-return-2485-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 02:11:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86130 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 02:11:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 02:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 34800 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:11:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34749 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:11:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34741 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 02:11:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:11:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amp@opendns.com designates 67.215.68.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.215.68.163] (HELO mail.opendns.com) (67.215.68.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:11:19 +0000 Received: from Adams-Desktop.local ([67.215.69.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.opendns.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id oB72Av6L009749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:10:57 GMT Message-ID: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:10:57 -0800 From: Adam Phelps User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Several problems after CDB3b2 to CDB3b3 upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm testing a hadoop version upgrade on a prototype EC2 cluster, but while I've now gotten most of it up and running (well, HDFS and HBase at least) I'm hitting some odd problems getting our M/R jobs to run. (I followed all the instructions at https://wiki.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Hadoop+Upgrade+from+CDH2+or+CDH3b2+to+CDH3b3 as well as fixing a number of problems that came up in that process.) They current problem I'm stuck on appears to be a classpath issue, but one I can't figure out. When running a job I hit this error: 10/12/07 02:01:05 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201012062243_0009_m_000182_0, Status : FAILED java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.HFileOutputFormat at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:973) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.JobContext.getOutputFormatClass(JobContext.java:236) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.initialize(Task.java:484) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:298) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1063) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:211) We do use HFileOutputFormat in our M/R job, however as far as I can tell that should be handled by out existing classpath: 10/12/07 02:07:25 INFO zookeeper.ZooKeeper: Client environment:java.class.path=/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/conf:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/lib/tools.jar:/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20:/usr/lib hadoop-0.20/hadoop- ... /jsp-2.1.jar:/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/lib/jsp-2.1/jsp-api-2.1.jar::/usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar:/usr/lib/hbase/conf:/usr/lib/zookeeper/zookeeper.jar /usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar:/usr/lib/hbase/conf:/usr/lib/zookeeper/zookeeper.jar It looks to me like HFileOutputFormat should be covered by that class path: # jar tf /usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar | grep HFileOutputFormat org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat$WriterLength.class org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat.class org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat$1.class Any ideas here? I have another similar issue, although with this one I have to assume that some package that was previously included with the base cloudera packages is no longer included: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/common/base/Function at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableMapReduceUtil.addDependencyJars(TableMapReduceUtil.java:247) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob(TableMapReduceUtil.java:81) Thanks - Adam From general-return-2486-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 02:19:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87783 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 02:19:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 02:19:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 39508 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39455 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39447 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 02:19:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.145] (HELO homiemail-a66.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:19:34 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81B1350075 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:19:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=q56rJCuzhoYCdUzPIKg0peMGYdLU+ls0SkatKUY2kYEbJSfz9wPL NTcF+uy83zRvybpVvnX01JWZqsDNnEQ6cx42aAnfeBGnIzHAu/hiAeoaIfWAJVxs 285S/f9sj+kfDbAJgyi9oKq38jDamf4ql/m/U/q+EnnFsv6EtigBT3c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=pbnmyRweemZ1iGoRvBZHtZODhMQ=; b=5BzqxXD0n0ufY6BX9EqVIrshfwAl qViUioEliu80nVdFbvzlmO7GEmf7n+0NrAtKXvSc5Vp4jhNAPeSyPZMw/fPT8T1N msCUDDfqfz/FQX1oTtL70X+gbiRhoft2dPhN6iRbnCRmHbR1X4pykgY40XbPQavP 3YkUJzUwlCL9caI= Received: from di-524.corp.day.com (wsip-98-189-13-228.oc.oc.cox.net [98.189.13.228]) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a66.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 89D89350063 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:19:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Several problems after CDB3b2 to CDB3b3 upgrade From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:19:12 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Questions about CDH are not appropriate for this mailing list. ....Roy From general-return-2487-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 02:21:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87979 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 02:21:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 02:21:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 41303 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:21:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41039 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41031 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 02:21:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:21:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:21:19 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so506812iwn.35 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.35.11 with SMTP id n11mr6786586ibd.168.1291688458802; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:20:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.154.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:20:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> References: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:20:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Several problems after CDB3b2 to CDB3b3 upgrade To: CDH Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325576e32bf57480496c8a759 --000325576e32bf57480496c8a759 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Adam, Please use the cdh-user list for Cloudera specific questions. (general now BCC) It seems to me that you aren't getting the hbase or guava jars on the classpath of the Hadoop task. That's independent of whether they're on the classpath of the program that submits the job. You can likely use TableMapReduceUtil.addDependencyJars(job) to fix this. Thanks -Todd On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Adam Phelps wrote: > I'm testing a hadoop version upgrade on a prototype EC2 cluster, but while > I've now gotten most of it up and running (well, HDFS and HBase at least) > I'm hitting some odd problems getting our M/R jobs to run. > > (I followed all the instructions at > https://wiki.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Hadoop+Upgrade+from+CDH2+or+CDH3b2+to+CDH3b3as well as fixing a number of problems that came up in that process.) > > They current problem I'm stuck on appears to be a classpath issue, but one > I can't figure out. When running a job I hit this error: > > 10/12/07 02:01:05 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_201012062243_0009_m_000182_0, Status : FAILED > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.HFileOutputFormat > at > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:973) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.JobContext.getOutputFormatClass(JobContext.java:236) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.initialize(Task.java:484) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:298) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child$4.run(Child.java:217) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at > org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(UserGroupInformation.java:1063) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:211) > > We do use HFileOutputFormat in our M/R job, however as far as I can tell > that should be handled by out existing classpath: > > 10/12/07 02:07:25 INFO zookeeper.ZooKeeper: Client > environment:java.class.path=/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/conf:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/lib/tools.jar:/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20:/usr/lib > hadoop-0.20/hadoop- > ... > /jsp-2.1.jar:/usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/lib/jsp-2.1/jsp-api-2.1.jar::/usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar:/usr/lib/hbase/conf:/usr/lib/zookeeper/zookeeper.jar > /usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar:/usr/lib/hbase/conf:/usr/lib/zookeeper/zookeeper.jar > > It looks to me like HFileOutputFormat should be covered by that class path: > > # jar tf /usr/lib/hbase/hbase.jar | grep HFileOutputFormat > org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat$WriterLength.class > org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat.class > org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/HFileOutputFormat$1.class > > Any ideas here? > > I have another similar issue, although with this one I have to assume that > some package that was previously included with the base cloudera packages is > no longer included: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > com/google/common/base/Function > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableMapReduceUtil.addDependencyJars(TableMapReduceUtil.java:247) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob(TableMapReduceUtil.java:81) > > Thanks > - Adam > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --000325576e32bf57480496c8a759-- From general-return-2488-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 02:38:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92540 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 02:38:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 02:38:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 58827 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:38:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58510 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 02:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58502 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 02:38:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:38:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of amp@opendns.com designates 67.215.68.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.215.68.163] (HELO mail.opendns.com) (67.215.68.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:38:11 +0000 Received: from Adams-Desktop.local ([67.215.69.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.opendns.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id oB72bnvI014169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:37:49 GMT Message-ID: <4CFD9DFD.8070107@opendns.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:37:49 -0800 From: Adam Phelps User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Todd Lipcon , CDH Users Subject: Re: Several problems after CDB3b2 to CDB3b3 upgrade References: <4CFD97B1.5030607@opendns.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/6/10 6:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Please use the cdh-user list for Cloudera specific questions. (general now > BCC) Ah, I'll get on that list now. Sorry for posting to the wrong list. > It seems to me that you aren't getting the hbase or guava jars on the > classpath of the Hadoop task. That's independent of whether they're on the > classpath of the program that submits the job. Thanks, I'll take a look to see where those are specified. - Adam From general-return-2489-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 03:37:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13148 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 03:37:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 03:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 4351 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 03:37:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4058 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 03:37:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4050 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 03:37:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:37:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.179] (HELO mail-gx0-f179.google.com) (209.85.161.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:37:20 +0000 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so7874915gxk.38 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:36:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.201.8 with SMTP id y8mr4530291anf.169.1291693018697; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.129 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:36:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:36:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm going to rather purposefully ignore larger questions like how the ASF works or doesn't, veto usage, etc. I'm not well versed enough in the Apache way to weigh in. As someone who sees a lot of Hadoop clusters at many different companies, I would like to see Hadoop's serialization system(s) change. I think Hadoop should support interfaces to control serialization plugin lifecycle and element serialization to / from an abstract notion of a datum and bytes only. I would like to not mention a serialization implementation by name in Hadoop proper, at all. A single implementation to serve as a reference implementation makes sense. To preserve backward compatibility and existing investment, it makes sense for that to be Writable (whether we like it or not). Additional implementations should be either "contrib" status (if that's still an option) or externally managed (probably preferred due to release cycle synchronization / update issues). The default classpath should remain as free of mandatory external dependencies as possible; library conflicts are still an extremely sore spot in Java development at many sites I visit and forcing a large commercial entity to use version X o something like Avro, Thrift, PB is almost a non-starter for many. If a PB / Thrift / Avro serialization implementation is part of contrib or externally managed, it requires the user to understand this dependency exists and manage the classpath. The precedent in my mind is the scheduler situation; most folks run with either the cap or fair schedulers but FIFO provides a default. If you opt to use one and it comes with dependencies, that's your business. I think we can simplify serialization plugin configuration via a classpath include system by using something like run-parts or similar and the current configuration system, but that's another issue. In absence of an "opt in" serialization configuration pattern, we must at least provide an "opt out." If a user uses thrift for their own MR jobs internally, we shouldn't throw a monkey wrench into their life by demanding it for core Hadoop. Provide them a means to de-configure built in serialization impls and remove thrift from the classpath. I'm a bit confused as to how this equates with sequence files being deprecated or arrested. I tried to read HADOOP-6685 but there's a lot of internal references and context I feel like I'm missing. Suffice it to say, sequence files can *not* be broken for existing data for the reasons everyone has stated. If we choose to focus development elsewhere ("soft deprecate") or actively encourage users elsewhere ("@Deprecated") is an issue I think we can sever from this discussion. tl;dr version: - Don't break existing SequenceFiles. - Serialization should be a richer interface to support plugin lifecycle, serialize / deserialize only and be retrofitted using PB, Avro, and Thrift as immediate consumer use cases. Serialization APIs should be promoted to a(n officially) public, documented, API suited to deal with modern serialization lib requirements. - Common, HDFS, MR should contain as few mandatory external deps as humanly possible because Java classloader semantics and a lack of internal dep isolation is just kookoo for cocoa puffs. (Simplify it and bring on our OSGI overlords.) - We (non-committers / users / casual contributors) want only for Hadoop to mature in features and stability, be an inviting community to new potential contributors and users, and to be around for a long time. Regards, respect, and thanks to all. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 Based on the discussion on HADOOP-6685, there is a pretty fundamental > difference of opinion about how Hadoop should evolve. We need to figure o= ut > how the majority of the PMC wants the project to evolve to understand whi= ch > patches move us forward. Please vote whether you approve of the following > direction. Clearly as the author, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > > Hadoop has always included library code so that users had a strong > foundation to build their applications on without needing to continually > reinvent the wheel. This combination of framework and powerful library co= de > is a common pattern for successful projects, such as Java, Lucene, etc. > Toward that end, we need to continue to extend the Hadoop library code an= d > actively maintain it as the framework evolves. Continuing support for > SequenceFile and TFile, which are both widely used is mandatory. The > opposite pattern of implementing the framework and letting each distribut= ion > add the required libraries will lead to increased community fragmentation > and vendor lock in. > > Hadoop's generic serialization framework had a lot of promise when it was > introduced, but has been hampered by a lack of plugins other than Writabl= es > and Java serialization. Supporting a wide range of serializations nativel= y > in Hadoop will give the users new capabilities. Currently, to support Avr= o > or ProtoBuf objects mutually incompatible third party solutions are > required. It benefits Hadoop to support them with a common framework that > will support all of them. In particular, having easy, out of the box supp= ort > for Thrift, ProtoBufs, Avro, and our legacy serializations is a desired > state. > > As a distributed system, there are many instances where Hadoop needs to > serialize data. Many of those applications need a lightweight, versioned > serialization framework like ProtocolBuffers or Thrift and using them is > appropriate. Adding dependences on Thrift and ProtocolBuffers to the > previous dependence on Avro is acceptable. --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2490-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 08:14:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42784 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 08:14:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 08:14:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 78600 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 08:14:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78198 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 08:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78190 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 08:14:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:14:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:14:27 +0000 Received: from omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id g8CG1f0010QkzPwA48E7bY; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:14:07 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id g8Dy1f0052VBGtd8N8E1y5; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:14:05 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:13:58 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: Eric, Since this is mostly technical, it probably should be on the h-6685 jira instead of general@hadoop. > I think Hadoop should support interfaces to control > serialization plugin lifecycle and element serialization to / from an > abstract notion of a datum and bytes only. The core of my h-6685 patch updates the API to replace the typename with a serialization name and serialization specific metadata. That metadata is a set of bytes that are defined by the serialization. The typename alone is insufficient for Avro and having additional metadata will be useful for the other serializations as well. Doug suggested that I add a user-friendly pair of methods and I did. While they are redundant, the set of serializations isn't expected to be large and therefore the extra code isn't much. > I would like to not mention > a serialization implementation by name in Hadoop proper, at all. My patch removes some of the lingering references to Writables in SequenceFile, MapFile, etc. and moves them over the generic serialization API. The framework will likely continue depend on whichever serialization is used for RPC. Currently that is Writables, but will likely transition to either Avro or ProtoBuf in the coming year. > A > single implementation to serve as a reference implementation makes > sense. A critical part of Hadoop's usability comes from its framework combined with library code that allows users to get the desired functionality without writing it themselves. Sure, it is easy to write a hash table yourself, but it is far easier to use the one bundled with Java. > The default > classpath should remain as free of mandatory external dependencies as > possible; library conflicts are still an extremely sore spot in Java > development at many sites I visit and forcing a large commercial > entity to use version X o something like Avro, Thrift, PB is almost a > non-starter for many. I discussed this problem in the jira, but either the MapReduce user is using the X library or doesn't care the version of X. If they are using it, it is far more convenient to have the serialization on the classpath. There is a missing feature that we need to address to put the user's files ahead of the system ones. I'll file a jira for that. It might also make sense for us to shade some of our dependencies, but that is a much bigger issue and is far from clear cut. > If a PB / Thrift / Avro serialization implementation is part of > contrib or externally managed, it requires the user to understand this > dependency exists and manage the classpath. The goal is to make Hadoop useful out of the box. If we make it so that Hadoop is only useful once it is bundled with 15 other projects, that is good for people who sell distributions that include Hadoop, but not for the project. > I think we can simplify > serialization plugin configuration via a classpath include system by > using something like run-parts or similar and the current > configuration system, but that's another issue. The current patch loads the serialization plugins based on the configuration. If you don't want to support thrift, don't configure it. The same holds true of the other serializations, even writable. > I'm a bit confused as to how this equates with sequence files being > deprecated or arrested. Doug vetoed my patch partially based on his assertion that SequenceFiles should be deprecated and that Hadoop should just be the framework with no library code. > If we choose to focus development > elsewhere ("soft deprecate") or actively encourage users elsewhere > ("@Deprecated") is an issue I think we can sever from this discussion. At this point the PMC has supported continuing to invest in developing SequenceFiles. > - Don't break existing SequenceFiles. That goes without saying, everyone has petabytes of data in them. > - Common, HDFS, MR should contain as few mandatory external deps as > humanly possible because Java classloader semantics and a lack of > internal dep isolation is just kookoo for cocoa puffs. (Simplify it > and bring on our OSGI overlords.) That is a much bigger discussion that we should probably have. There are costs on both sides in terms of debugging and understandability. In particular, in most cases we are much better off using a library that has the right functionality that re-implementing it ourselves. > - We (non-committers / users / casual contributors) want only for > Hadoop to mature in features and stability, be an inviting community > to new potential contributors and users, and to be around for a long > time. I want that too. -- Owen From general-return-2491-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 10:24:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94672 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 10:24:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 10:24:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 15137 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 10:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14870 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 10:24:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14862 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 10:24:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:24:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:24:01 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so7697363yxm.35 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:23:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.73.136 with SMTP id s8mr1213822icj.449.1291717419631; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:23:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.169.10 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:23:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:23:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e867ef283010496cf65de --90e6ba6e867ef283010496cf65de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > A critical part of Hadoop's usability comes from its framework combined > with library code that allows users to get the desired functionality without > writing it themselves. > > The goal is to make Hadoop useful out of the box. > To the best of my knowledge, Owen, your organization requires users to petition a committee before writing MapReduce jobs. At Facebook, the vast majority of jobs are submitted via Hive. Our customers at Cloudera primarily consume MapReduce through Pig, Hive, and other high-level tools. Users of Hadoop have moved beyond MapReduce. The community would be far better served by a compact, reliable, and efficient kernel. That's the project direction Doug has suggested for MapReduce, and it's one that Eric and Tom have supported. I also support this direction for the project. We're clearly having a hard time, as a community, agreeing on standards for library code. We've also shipped updates to the framework without updating the library code, seriously damaging the usability of the project. In this discussion, we're prioritizing the rapidly shrinking proportion of users of MapReduce library code in favor of the far larger community of consumers of the framework. Arun recently asked on Quora about issues that users face with Hadoop MapReduce: http://qr.ae/pPNK. There are currently five issues brought up there, with 19 votes for those issues; none of them are addressed directly by this extended debate. I'd be ecstatic to see this discussion result in moving the file formats, input and output formats, and other library code out to a separate Apache project or Github where they can evolve rapidly based on user needs, so that the MapReduce project can begin to address some of the outstanding issues with the framework itself. HDFS, HBase, Hive, Pig, Oozie, and other Hadoop-related projects continue to make forward progress at a remarkable rate; I'd like to see MapReduce return to health as well. Clearing away these major sources of conflict seems like one promising path forward. So, I'm not on the PMC, but I'm -1 on the proposed vote. --90e6ba6e867ef283010496cf65de-- From general-return-2492-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 11:28:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23180 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 11:28:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 11:28:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 26409 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 11:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26105 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 11:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26097 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 11:28:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:28:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:28:02 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so7753971gyf.35 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:27:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XMWalalq89tb7GeePxLAVN/aCdc2klD6jAtpnhf/6jg=; b=WS8ciy1aVSx31qn9nZEmDq8iRSFnJHPfW3F/g5OKaJvHFQubOto7ZdZ8qXKBpdgtk/ JWW6oFaEpkZ51GYiAZgXRk8ORPonZi0H5Za/jHsjEGRRpiuvz6evjQ/HZcPgDxPqJfUK 6OosMmCR3PyC+xOwlV4Lq/R+BQvg4OvzuLmyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VmysPttS27jxQh4iqDIvwzf1E0NKP0pxPnuW7DTFiDm/aOGZiKkDLjvEV2qPaFywup Iwplyhfp52GkWLF2zKWMONapd8kX+PGPbsHwx7hY2SP3PC0e7cm6ibUAwby6aYl83meX IEy6hq+2s+/xUWBBwRG8S2mc//m8kIKW874NE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.203.15 with SMTP id a15mr1634959ybg.136.1291721261626; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:27:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 03:27:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 03:27:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3755af2b48e0496d04a85 --000e0cd3755af2b48e0496d04a85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It really takes time to understand the issue. I will spend more time reading through it. So far I feel that we need to distinguish between a) issues that define the general direction for the project, and b) the specifics of the implementation proposed by Owen, including decisions induced by that implementation. The main contradictory issue on which Owen and Doug disagree (other people as well) is whether Hadoop should support multiple serializations or be based on one designated serialization. This is a defining general direction a-issue. I believe this is vote-able. The question of introducing dependency on ProtoBuf is a b-issue, as it can be implemented differently. Say with "pluggable" APIs as Tom proposed. This is probably a consensus-type issue. Looks to me if we decide on multiple vs designated serializations, some b-issues may be automatically ruled out or in. Thanks, --Konstantin P.S. We used to have a tradition of presenting design documents before introducing such big changes. I believe a discussion of a design doc would have reduced tensions we face now. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > All, > We really need some guidance on the general direction for the project. > Please comment and/or vote. If no one cares, then I'll probably commit it to > Yahoo's internal branch. > > -- Owen > > The question is how the Hadoop project wants to move forward. >> >> It was motivated by Doug's veto of HADOOP-6685, which was based on his >> personal decisions about how the project should go forward and not on >> anything that had been decided by the PMC. >> >> These decisions are much more important to MapReduce, which is a >> framework, than HDFS which is a client/server model. >> >> 1. Should Hadoop include a user-facing library of useful code? >> >> There has been a suggestion that user-facing library code, such as >> SequenceFile, TFile, DistCp, etc. should be deprecated and that Hadoop >> should allow third party projects like Avro to supply the user-facing >> library code that makes Hadoop usable. I think it is critical that we keep >> those components as part of Hadoop and extend them as the framework evolves. >> Users depend heavily on SequenceFile for storing their data in Hadoop and >> they should not be deprecated as Doug has suggested. >> >> 2. Should MapReduce support non-Writables through the pipeline out of the >> box? >> >> There has also been a discussion about whether we should support >> non-Writables natively. There is already library code in Avro that lets >> users use Avro types in a custom MapReduce API. A general MapReduce API that >> encompasses all of the serialization frameworks and does not lock users into >> a particular one is much more powerful. >> >> Furthermore, making it convenient for the users, by including the plugins >> in the default configuration and class path, will enable the use of Avro, >> Thrift and ProtoBuf objects by people who would rather not focus on >> serialization. Avro and Writables should not be the only first class >> serializations that Hadoop supports by default. >> >> 3. Should a framework dependency on ProtoBuf be allowed? >> >> Doug has added several framework dependences on Avro. The question is >> whether it is acceptable to use the ProtoBuf library in the framework. Avro >> is good for uses where there are a lot of objects of the same type. ProtoBuf >> is better for small number of objects. The question is whether Avro, JSON, >> and XML should be the only serialization libraries that are acceptable to >> use in the framework. >> > > --000e0cd3755af2b48e0496d04a85-- From general-return-2493-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 15:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29620 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 15:56:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 15:56:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 90546 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 15:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90291 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 15:56:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90282 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 15:56:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:56:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:56:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c36.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.36]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oB7FtXn0048762 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:55:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291737333; bh=uZk5t0oHFwQR59LYpm+uF4vz2p/xLDnq6p87Rm1fcLo=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=Rd8XYnYWwTGT5PXlWBTxXy+o0U7FSmVU+7Blyh6xHPZM8IyRGFf/8p35fqd5Ixyth Jy7OB/cqpLIHtDLlnApfesKrHIMvfUDgzmeL0aTJZSW7QQ4vmXhNLvZytlNE6giJ7m SLknrQ/dHrSVIu/zaI2Z+A3Q+79eG5OsVu77swSM= Message-Id: <3DADA469-AC41-4D4C-97F1-FA13077A3B24@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-323--102479568 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:55:32 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-323--102479568 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > I'm a bit confused as to how this equates with sequence files being > deprecated or arrested. I tried to read HADOOP-6685 but there's a lot > of internal references and context I feel like I'm missing. Suffice it > to say, sequence files can *not* be broken for existing data for the > reasons everyone has stated. If we choose to focus development > elsewhere ("soft deprecate") or actively encourage users elsewhere > ("@Deprecated") is an issue I think we can sever from this discussion. I'm surprised that your are confused. http://s.apache.org/h6685-veto Doug is very clear that he is vetoing the patch based on 2 reasons: a) dependency on PB b) extension to SequenceFile a) is technical, and we can debate about it. b) isn't. It's his 'vision' for the project, a vision which hasn't been ratified by the PMC. Arun --Apple-Mail-323--102479568-- From general-return-2494-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 16:07:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43498 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 16:07:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 16:07:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 10133 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:07:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9960 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9952 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 16:07:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:07:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:06:57 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so68438qyk.14 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:06:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=U6KuneBJIdd1WSiwgRI7Trk4K9KpxJAaRfdINclZyBk=; b=XKpmwkSOXYF4emc4PKP+9wEXHh4GCkqgqQh7ZxkvN1XcceMeo5FMnRC4YkHveZwM23 CCvtXgpd7Cy33qXuXRG8YYsG7UdZABv2BOiBAaPBI380ICmsPaKtImQVnp5jj7Cxf/I0 pk9Srj8rMjohzpRi7adH9e+XlyiZdhMOIjEqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rRGXcXHg03vWK6gWBdoa4UY9tzyk3N5qn02xYN05ZtreGahgqQL+vj0TcpbrECRCSj zYdEqRJfnPUxZhj39Zt0lM4ubbS5l+PhZFoGEabBRme1O3ocso8gf6iKmFSpDci5l5N6 rg2M+vxu4Nx6hg0d7rbtnJfEoQNYVFzAMfseA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.183.66 with SMTP id cf2mr5935705qcb.57.1291737996725; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.159.136 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:06:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3DADA469-AC41-4D4C-97F1-FA13077A3B24@yahoo-inc.com> References: <3DADA469-AC41-4D4C-97F1-FA13077A3B24@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:06:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646dace700ef70496d430de --00163646dace700ef70496d430de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 a) On the PB dependency.. can't we just use JSON and call it a day? I mean, we're gonna have a new dependency so that we can encode a single tuple? That doesn't even make engineering sense, let alone that the choice of PB looks like a deliberate decision to try and tweak Doug's nose, whether that was the intention or not. Even if you could make a case for some very minor benefit of using PB instead of one of the 3 serialization methods already on the classpath, it's hard to see why it's worth going to the mat over it. And again, as a user, every additional classpath element in Hadoop is a potential future conflict that I'll have to sort out for some non-exciting business process I'm writing. b) Agreeing with Eric.. backwards compatibility is essential for sequence file. It seems to me that past a certain point, it's easier to just make a new file format rather than cramming further functionality and backwards-compatibility layers into the SequenceFile class, but as long as it's backward compatible then I'm sure people will be fine. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > I'm a bit confused as to how this equates with sequence files being >> deprecated or arrested. I tried to read HADOOP-6685 but there's a lot >> of internal references and context I feel like I'm missing. Suffice it >> to say, sequence files can *not* be broken for existing data for the >> reasons everyone has stated. If we choose to focus development >> elsewhere ("soft deprecate") or actively encourage users elsewhere >> ("@Deprecated") is an issue I think we can sever from this discussion. >> > > I'm surprised that your are confused. > > http://s.apache.org/h6685-veto > > Doug is very clear that he is vetoing the patch based on 2 reasons: > a) dependency on PB > b) extension to SequenceFile > > a) is technical, and we can debate about it. > > b) isn't. It's his 'vision' for the project, a vision which hasn't been > ratified by the PMC. > > Arun --00163646dace700ef70496d430de-- From general-return-2495-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 16:13:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46049 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 16:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 23078 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22242 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21929 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 16:13:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c36.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.36]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oB7GCYWX053966 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:12:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291738354; bh=rmzsgHpVNcX2fRJ/6OpmPNIC3E88FMtFftM8Xmk3XHk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=skmNsckJf9xT2vNBEUEOC6qUUOJwgWE3hdYBim5Y24s0nxX6cpLesP3eZdShKtDcM 2d4orBA5UmZNmwdotsdlrvr8cBTsKN46tvuP2RLe+UMRUdEhV2FTsWvua8/OKKaGU3 BNQxciX17bFBOLicmnLNoN7G7hp3uZ2mh1pqb/rg= Message-Id: <2E0EE1F3-F322-4EDA-95D3-47FE97B34383@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:12:33 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > To the best of my knowledge, Owen, your organization requires users to > petition a committee before writing MapReduce jobs. I'd appreciate if we could keep the discussion technical and did not resort to snide comments. Thank you. > Users of Hadoop have moved beyond MapReduce. The community would be > far > better served by a compact, reliable, and efficient kernel. That's the > project direction Doug has suggested for MapReduce, and it's one > that Eric > and Tom have supported. I also support this direction for the project. > This is a great discussion to have, if Doug could start it, rather than put forward his word as the law. However, this is not germane to the discussion at hand. The discussion at hand is simple: Doug has vetoed this patch for 2 reasons: a) dependency on PB b) extension to SequenceFile a) is technical, b) isn't. This discussion is about b). > I'd be ecstatic to see this discussion result in moving the file > formats, > input and output formats, and other library code out to a separate > Apache > project or Github where they can evolve rapidly based on user needs, > so that > the MapReduce project can begin to address some of the outstanding > issues > with the framework itself. Again, no one is proposing new file formats here. SequenceFile is an important file format for several reasons: > - It's been bundled with Hadoop for nearly 5 years now - Several users store petabytes of data on it Blocking extensions to SequenceFile is unreasonable as has been noted by several folks, there is no *technical* reason to do that. People are welcome to start any number of file-formats and input/ output libraries either in Apache or outside, no one is proposing otherwise. Arun From general-return-2496-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 16:47:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60683 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 16:47:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 16:47:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 79219 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:46:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78860 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 16:46:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78845 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 16:46:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:46:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:46:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c36.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.36]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oB7GjX2j057786 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:45:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291740333; bh=rGeZfZ60myqjHn+5D/9wc8L11wR8XTeSKM6Im2FPaEo=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=YAoKJ93cdnjlAzjpiWVWfZv6j8OFygDiOU2CyVMrehzpOL96cf3eD+FUDKtPIzzU4 Leb2YU7PeYe3w0nmPcYpT5FU6TYwJaD6Cy+nH9bJl7J6eUBpbpSDF9IrlLU+irUZwc sd5+x9fzMUINhWW4xFzyyXq/6FmjkVIV8iosUHds= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:45:32 -0800 References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> On 12/06/2010 02:40 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >>> It is nonsense to assert that every PMC member has the right to >>> block >>> work because it conflicts with their personal vision [ ... ] >> >> This is the way Apache projects operate. It requires that folks >> listen to criticism and potentially accept compromises if they wish >> to make progress. If folks cannot reach consensus in an area then >> that area will not make progress. > > Generally speaking, vetoing extension interfaces without a compelling > technical reason is not the way Apache operates. We make extensions > modular so that diverse collaborators can specialize according to > their own needs, not just your needs. Thanks for the clarifications Roy. Doug, do you wish to retract your veto on extensions to SequenceFile? We can continue discussions on the rest of the technical merits of the jira. thanks, Arun From general-return-2497-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 17:18:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80383 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 17:18:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 17:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27977 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27892 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27884 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:18:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 80115 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:18:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:18:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:18:32 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/06/2010 05:09 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Generally speaking, vetoing extension interfaces without a compelling > technical reason is not the way Apache operates. We make extensions > modular so that diverse collaborators can specialize according to > their own needs, not just your needs. Roy, thanks for your thoughts here. I have not intended to veto an extension mechanism. In this case, we already have an extension mechanism. The proposal is to change the extension mechanism incompatibly with unclear benefits, add implementations of several extensions to the kernel, and incompatibly change a widely-used file format. In general I support improving extension mechanisms, but oppose gratuitous changes to file formats and the inclusion of new user-level functionality in the kernel. I'd like the issue to focus solely on the extension mechanism to clarify the discussion, not on adding extensions to the kernel or file formats. Tom long ago provided patches showing how the existing configuration system can provide equivalent extension implementations outside of the kernel with no incompatible changes. (MAPREDUCE-376 and MAPREDUCE-377) > Changes to the existing products, > including plans like the one Owen described, are subject to vote if anyone > disagrees with them. Is this described somewhere? The HTTPD page says, "Long term plans are simply announcements that group members are working on particular issues related to the Apache software. These are not voted on [...]." > They are also subject to veto if and only if they > are to be applied to the current release branch (or a released branch). Owen intends to merge this patch to a release branch. > The compelling reason would be a measured performance impact or some > other objective degradation of the existing product that can be > evaluated by others as a cost/benefit tradeoff and perhaps compensated > by modifying the implementation. Files written by the proposed new version would not be readable by older versions of Hadoop. An unaltered application that upgrades to the newer version would begin creating files that could not be interchanged with folks running the older version. > If a PMC member insists on making design opinion the sole basis of their > vetoes, then they are not collaborating with the rest of the PMC. The > board will recommend that such a person be removed from the PMC so that > the majority can continue to develop the product in peace. I am not the sole PMC member to express these opinions. Doug From general-return-2498-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 17:22:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81811 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 17:22:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 17:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 35017 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:22:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34971 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34963 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:22:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:22:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:22:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 81424 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:22:13 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:22:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFE6D41.3050809@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:22:09 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/07/2010 03:27 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > The main contradictory issue on which Owen and Doug disagree (other people > as well) is whether > Hadoop should support multiple serializations or be based on one designated > serialization. > This is a defining general direction a-issue. I believe this is vote-able. I no longer think we should add any new serialization implementations to the kernel. We might provide implementations as separate libraries that folks choose to use, but we should work to make sure that user code is well distinguished from the kernel and also try not to pollute the users classpath with particular versions of popular libraries. Doug From general-return-2499-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 17:26:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83648 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 17:26:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 17:26:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 44778 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:26:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44641 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 17:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44633 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:26:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:26:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:26:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 83586 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 17:26:21 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:26:21 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFE6E3C.7010401@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:26:20 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <2E0EE1F3-F322-4EDA-95D3-47FE97B34383@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <2E0EE1F3-F322-4EDA-95D3-47FE97B34383@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Blocking extensions to SequenceFile is unreasonable as has been noted by > several folks, there is no *technical* reason to do that. The change to SequenceFile is incompatible with older versions of Hadoop. It changes the file's version number so that older versions will not be able to read data written by newer versions. This is a technical issue. Doug From general-return-2500-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 18:08:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19687 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 18:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 18:08:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 94617 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:08:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94533 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:08:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94525 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 18:08:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:08:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.46] (HELO mail-gw0-f46.google.com) (74.125.83.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:08:50 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so190254gwj.33 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:08:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.49.1 with SMTP id w1mr2333491ybw.210.1291745309897; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.129 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:08:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:08:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for your response Owen. I'll common on the JIRA with my opinion. I didn't want to muddy the existing conversation, but if it helps to have user level input, I'm happy to throw my hat in the ring. Just the summary version this time: Non-technical: - I believe we need to temper our goals of stability with the need for growth and improvement. The project should be free to innovate. We all agree on this. How we do that is the question to me. We should take a (brief) step back to make a decision on that. - We should reevaluate how most people view and are using Hadoop to help us make these decisions. For instance, do people see Hadoop as a turn key system that includes everything required or do they view it as a framework for building custom data systems? What I've seen and believe is that it's more the latter and having some "after market" customization is normal. The community / ASF spinning off projects like Pig, Hive, ZK, Chukwa, and others reinforce this in my mind; these are not bits of Hadoop proper, but natural extensions with their own development path and release schedules. - No one benefits from Hadoop being difficult for people to use including those of us at Cloudera[1]. I don't want anyone to see us as wanting to create complexity. We all benefit from a healthy Hadoop community. Technical: - Any modification to SequenceFile (and friends) worry me as so much is tightly bound to them. This is something I think is an artifact of people coding to the implementation rather than the interface, so to speak. - Generally, I agree with a lot of Owen's motivation (e.g. codifying the serialization system, using multiple libs to prove it's proper) but some of the implementation can be more forgiving of some usage patterns in the wild (e.g. the conflicting dep version issues, whether future dev on some these file formats should be extracted from the Hadoop proper). Proposal: - Codify (by vote) whether design plans are required or if an informal email indicating intent is sufficient, and under what circumstances. Provide examples to clarify circumstances. Solves the long term but not HADOOP-6685. - Focus the discussion on evaluation of proposals for remedying the process for conflict resolution. I know some exist, but they're drastic (removal of PMC members, for instance). - After consensus on above, focus the conversation (in another thread or on JIRA, whatever is most appropriate) on HADOOP-6685 so no one is blocked. - Put the community of users first in all areas of development and interact= ion. [1] I am officially speaking out of school. I am not an official spokesperson for Cloudera. This is my opinion and I happen to work at Cloudera. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > Eric, > =A0 Since this is mostly technical, it probably should be on the h-6685 j= ira > instead of general@hadoop. > >> I think Hadoop should support interfaces to control >> serialization plugin lifecycle and element serialization to / from an >> abstract notion of a datum and bytes only. > > The core of my h-6685 patch updates the API to replace the typename with = a > serialization name and serialization specific metadata. That metadata is = a > set of bytes that are defined by the serialization. The typename alone is > insufficient for Avro and having additional metadata will be useful for t= he > other serializations as well. > > Doug suggested that I add a user-friendly pair of methods and I did. Whil= e > they are redundant, the set of serializations isn't expected to be large = and > therefore the extra code isn't much. > >> I would like to not mention >> a serialization implementation by name in Hadoop proper, at all. > > My patch removes some of the lingering references to Writables in > SequenceFile, MapFile, etc. and moves them over the generic serialization > API. The framework will likely continue depend on whichever serialization= is > used for RPC. Currently that is Writables, but will likely transition to > either Avro or ProtoBuf in the coming year. > >> A >> single implementation to serve as a reference implementation makes >> sense. > > A critical part of Hadoop's usability comes from its framework combined w= ith > library code that allows users to get the desired functionality without > writing it themselves. Sure, it is easy to write a hash table yourself, b= ut > it is far easier to use the one bundled with Java. > >> The default >> classpath should remain as free of mandatory external dependencies as >> possible; library conflicts are still an extremely sore spot in Java >> development at many sites I visit and forcing a large commercial >> entity to use version X o something like Avro, Thrift, PB is almost a >> non-starter for many. > > I discussed this problem in the jira, but either the MapReduce user is us= ing > the X library or doesn't care the version of X. If they are using it, it = is > far more convenient to have the serialization on the classpath. There is = a > missing feature that we need to address to put the user's files ahead of = the > system ones. I'll file a jira for that. > > It might also make sense for us to shade some of our dependencies, but th= at > is a much bigger issue and is far from clear cut. > >> If a PB / Thrift / Avro serialization implementation is part of >> contrib or externally managed, it requires the user to understand this >> dependency exists and manage the classpath. > > The goal is to make Hadoop useful out of the box. If we make it so that > Hadoop is only useful once it is bundled with 15 other projects, that is > good for people who sell distributions that include Hadoop, but not for t= he > project. > >> I think we can simplify >> serialization plugin configuration via a classpath include system by >> using something like run-parts or similar and the current >> configuration system, but that's another issue. > > The current patch loads the serialization plugins based on the > configuration. If you don't want to support thrift, don't configure it. T= he > same holds true of the other serializations, even writable. > >> I'm a bit confused as to how this equates with sequence files being >> deprecated or arrested. > > Doug vetoed my patch partially based on his assertion that SequenceFiles > should be deprecated and that Hadoop should just be the framework with no > library code. > >> =A0If we choose to focus development >> elsewhere ("soft deprecate") or actively encourage users elsewhere >> ("@Deprecated") is an issue I think we can sever from this discussion. > > At this point the PMC has supported continuing to invest in developing > SequenceFiles. > >> - Don't break existing SequenceFiles. > > That goes without saying, everyone has petabytes of data in them. > >> - Common, HDFS, MR should contain as few mandatory external deps as >> humanly possible because Java classloader semantics and a lack of >> internal dep isolation is just kookoo for cocoa puffs. (Simplify it >> and bring on our OSGI overlords.) > > That is a much bigger discussion that we should probably have. There are > costs on both sides in terms of debugging and understandability. In > particular, in most cases we are much better off using a library that has > the right functionality that re-implementing it ourselves. > >> - We (non-committers / users / casual contributors) want only for >> Hadoop to mature in features and stability, be an inviting community >> to new potential contributors and users, and to be around for a long >> time. > > I want that too. > > -- Owen > > > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2501-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 18:25:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26582 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 18:25:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 18:25:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 26226 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:25:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26154 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:25:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26146 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 18:25:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:25:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.228] (HELO qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:25:36 +0000 Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gJ9L1f0080lTkoCAFJRGLt; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:25:16 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gJR71f00A2SbwD58QJR9hJ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:25:14 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4CFE6E3C.7010401@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:25:05 -0800 References: <2E0EE1F3-F322-4EDA-95D3-47FE97B34383@yahoo-inc.com> <4CFE6E3C.7010401@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/07/2010 08:12 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> Blocking extensions to SequenceFile is unreasonable as has been >> noted by >> several folks, there is no *technical* reason to do that. > > The change to SequenceFile is incompatible with older versions of > Hadoop. It changes the file's version number so that older versions > will not be able to read data written by newer versions. This is a > technical issue. The new code reads the new or old versions of SequenceFile seamlessly using auto-detection of the version. The old code fails with an explicit message saying that it can't read this version. This is the only mechanism available when upgrading a file format with a single version number and is the mechanism that we've used 6 times in the past. If we'd used ProtocolBuffers for the SequenceFile header, we'd have more options for backwards compatibility, but we didn't. -- Owen From general-return-2502-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 18:27:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28595 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 18:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 18:27:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 35087 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34945 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34937 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 18:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.46] (HELO mail-gw0-f46.google.com) (74.125.83.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:27:06 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so204607gwj.33 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lAMQtnNtXp/qb03RX4onCTGyRM0gMnw0akkbJsTna94=; b=CEsVwA0kdzgPomeWUAMtXqFeJyPSG2NAAaQUKYHtXYDrssShDXMysQuwCeMgllE6qe 7dr56y7gcZl9SNI3h+OBV397G8kvEWzfhNp8hKl5KYqUKHAGvbGQZg7MXCyaxL82lBxj JvMWnhIdpCpx5nzL3po2ZDn3W3BcmiEr2CUwk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RVGAJgLcQ2IdELzqGF/e3jaZeLX6OOaWQwnWFGZcaXVA9l6JE89mMM5HHkkM16PgZX 7CmvHs41mOc0sQ7tsSapoYDW2I6qhGxi1Wck43/Ta6BNePXxexBOjqWMtvDFsprCz5mQ UoAzeZs+QSQd9SLdwMd1xjzyU/QoM7XabZ4MM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.203.15 with SMTP id a15mr2415730ybg.136.1291746405187; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:26:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CFE6D41.3050809@apache.org> References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> <4CFE6D41.3050809@apache.org> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:26:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3755a9f00b80496d625f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3755a9f00b80496d625f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I no longer think we should add any new serialization implementations to the kernel. Not clear. Do you propose to keep current serialization(s) and not add new ones? Or do you propose to replace current serialization by abstract interfaces and move implementations to libraries? --Konstantin On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/07/2010 03:27 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> The main contradictory issue on which Owen and Doug disagree (other people >> as well) is whether >> Hadoop should support multiple serializations or be based on one >> designated >> serialization. >> This is a defining general direction a-issue. I believe this is vote-able. >> > > I no longer think we should add any new serialization implementations to > the kernel. We might provide implementations as separate libraries that > folks choose to use, but we should work to make sure that user code is well > distinguished from the kernel and also try not to pollute the users > classpath with particular versions of popular libraries. > > Doug > --000e0cd3755a9f00b80496d625f0-- From general-return-2503-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 07 22:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44219 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 22:38:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 22:38:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 11042 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 22:38:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10951 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 22:38:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10943 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 22:38:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:38:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.202] (HELO homiemail-a27.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:38:03 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C767598088 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:37:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=Q4dEr7A0rfqoI1OlKA3nPEWbAN+PCDqUjveV3otCf5KhlDfGO5iu kuu/CZ12OoF3vwpUtBNkTpeUqDlYTxra30NDOokFQe2wSw/6imgtUCDiEcXZhOrJ nI18uzx1wFyE4W6gLkzD8aJitLRQi0TZNWWVCazYNNz5e840wR9rrdI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=Qs6/KSTZ2RZp+Z8oUZsqZUS9Qx4=; b=PFI4V3yytO3EXzjgmBHp056SJO1P uzetmcXOgnYhGLkvL+1Rzy8GkXID4Uqf6ZXj/nilSpsBlQFzy68Bk2v7/If3oqec uTjbeFi9vsZZ5YjC4ovFjhW8xwSjN2Y2lQTo2yaW660BgKsVUYLyQhy+tIAD6fTS 54zgdOXNc/vX2EE= Received: from [192.168.1.66] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E83E2598087 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:37:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 14:37:42 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/06/2010 05:09 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> Generally speaking, vetoing extension interfaces without a compelling >> technical reason is not the way Apache operates. We make extensions >> modular so that diverse collaborators can specialize according to >> their own needs, not just your needs. >=20 > Roy, thanks for your thoughts here. >=20 > I have not intended to veto an extension mechanism. In this case, we = already have an extension mechanism. It is my understanding that the existing extension mechanism did not support the desired extensions, so improving it makes sense. > The proposal is to change the extension mechanism incompatibly with = unclear benefits, Good, these are technical reasons. The benefits can be cleared by docs. By incompatible, I assume you mean forward-compatibility of old versions of Hadoop reading newer files. Can we fix that by having the new implementation use the old file format by default until it is configured to use one of the new interfaces for writing? > add implementations of several extensions to the kernel, and = incompatibly change a widely-used file format. You keep referring to the kernel as if it were a product. I don't see a kernel product in the list of things released by Apache Hadoop. If there were such a product, then it would make sense for Apache Hadoop to also release ancillary products for common libraries, test = frameworks, and modular storage interfaces. Rearchitecting the Hadoop product suite into such a logical arrangement would make sense, and after such an architecture is put into place then "keeping the kernel simple" would be a reason to veto a change to the kernel. > In general I support improving extension mechanisms, but oppose = gratuitous changes to file formats and the inclusion of new user-level = functionality in the kernel. Persistence is not usually considered user-level functionality, nor do the proposed changes seem gratuitous. Owen said the reason was to support type-safety, which may well be a desirable feature for some users. I think it makes sense to find a way to modularize the feature such that this functionality is only brought in when configured by the user. > I'd like the issue to focus solely on the extension mechanism to = clarify the discussion, not on adding extensions to the kernel or file = formats. That is irrelevant. Doing development via jira discussion is inherently dysfunctional because it promotes such bureaucratic nonsense instead of working towards a common solution via iterative development. My goal here is to fix this goofy behavior, not reinforce it. > Tom long ago provided patches showing how the existing configuration = system can provide equivalent extension implementations outside of the = kernel with no incompatible changes. (MAPREDUCE-376 and MAPREDUCE-377) They both seem to be active and unfinished. If they are equivalent = fixes to the same problem, then I suggest applying them to a branch, = documenting how they work, and then agreeing to have a bake-off. A bake-off is a decision made by performance and feature-completeness as an objective way to resolve an impasse due to mutually exclusive vetoes. All sides = agree to drop the veto and accept whichever performs best, by majority = decision. >> Changes to the existing products, >> including plans like the one Owen described, are subject to vote if = anyone >> disagrees with them. >=20 > Is this described somewhere? The HTTPD page says, "Long term plans = are simply announcements that group members are working on particular = issues related to the Apache software. These are not voted on [...]." All action items can be voted on. What we are talking about here is a short term plan, and it is listed as a type of action item under changes to products. >> They are also subject to veto if and only if they >> are to be applied to the current release branch (or a released = branch). >=20 > Owen intends to merge this patch to a release branch. Right. >> The compelling reason would be a measured performance impact or some >> other objective degradation of the existing product that can be >> evaluated by others as a cost/benefit tradeoff and perhaps = compensated >> by modifying the implementation. >=20 > Files written by the proposed new version would not be readable by = older versions of Hadoop. An unaltered application that upgrades to the = newer version would begin creating files that could not be interchanged = with folks running the older version. Good reason, so let's fix that. Note, however, that one valid solution = is to simply release it as a new major version of the product. >> If a PMC member insists on making design opinion the sole basis of = their >> vetoes, then they are not collaborating with the rest of the PMC. = The >> board will recommend that such a person be removed from the PMC so = that >> the majority can continue to develop the product in peace. >=20 > I am not the sole PMC member to express these opinions. No, but the other objections seem to be suffering from a lack of = independent thought and are predicated on the theory that outside organizations will satisfy the needs of our users instead of an Apache project solving them directly. That is extremely annoying to me, since the only reason I am = here is to deal with some folks' failure to think independently of their = employer. ....Roy From general-return-2504-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 03:32:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68898 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 03:32:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 03:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 82166 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 03:32:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81887 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 03:32:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81879 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 03:32:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:32:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.16] (HELO EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:32:15 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.16]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:31:54 -0800 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:33:35 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Thread-Index: AcuWiHTQceIcGmOYTT6DRRdx+DlGNQ== Message-ID: References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I do not support adding new dependencies to the classpath of MapReduce us= er >> tasks. >=20 >=20 > That isn't reasonable. As Hadoop evolves, we have and will continue to ad= d > dependences. For example, in your last MapReduce (MAPREDUCE-980) patch yo= u > added avro and paranamer as dependences. >=20 As a non PMC member: Hadoop has already put enough stuff on the classpath to force me to make a = custom build to use (in 0.19 was the start, and now no distribution can wor= k without modification). This is because of it stuffing more and more thin= gs on the classpath. It is completely reaonable to ask that the environment that user code runs = in not be polluted with libraries that are not exposed in the Hadoop API, a= nd debate the merits of a patch based on the inclusion of an additional jar= on that classpath. Webapp containers, OSGi, other classloader systems, or dependency rebasing = (jarjar links, maven shade, etc) help solve this sort of mess.Even more cru= dely, the user's lib directory doesn't have to be Hadoop's full lib directo= ry, and the order of inclusion of jars can help. Either way, if Hadoop wants to be an application execution framework, it ca= n't just throw whatever it wants on the classpath forever. If one wants to provide lots of tools as part of a rich environment for use= rs, the user has to either be able to easily _opt in_ to having those tools= available on their class path or _opt out_ of having them there. Now, this is really a tangent to other issues at hand.=20 I'd like to suggest that rather than point fingers at who added what to wha= t classpath and when, it is just noted that classpath management is a probl= em that Hadoop needs to solve and not ignore. I'm pretty sure there's a JI= RA on it somewhere already. Until it is solved to some degree (since on a scale of 1 to 10 dealing with= classpath collisions, Hadoop is currently somewhere between 0 and 1), its = going to limit what can be built without causing user applications to break= on an upgrade. Whether those new features are good or bad on its own mer= its is being conflated with classpath problems that it introduces for users= . > -- Owen From general-return-2505-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 05:27:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8816 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 05:26:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 05:26:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 31974 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 05:26:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31616 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 05:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31606 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 05:26:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:26:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:26:49 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LD300AE4GFP1P40@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:26:15 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012070253 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-08_03:2010-12-08,2010-12-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] clarifying the bylaws From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <159E99C4-B71C-437E-9640-AA24C50D636E@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:26:13 -0800 Message-id: <77BB1207-9DB3-4B5F-A67B-6222D34D52B2@mac.com> References: <159E99C4-B71C-437E-9640-AA24C50D636E@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) +1, this fixes the issues I raised. N. On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > As Nigel pointed out, the bylaws didn't match the discussion. > > Here is a proposed patch. > > *** bylaws.txt 2010-11-29 11:26:53.000000000 -0800 > --- bylaws2.txt 2010-11-29 11:20:05.000000000 -0800 > *************** > *** 207,214 **** > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website > content, etc. > > ! Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of > ! one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1. > > * Release Plan > > --- 207,213 ---- > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website > content, etc. > > ! Lazy consensus of active committers. > > * Release Plan > > *************** > *** 269,275 **** > > Modifying this document. > > ! Lazy majority of active PMC members > > * Voting Timeframes > > --- 268,274 ---- > > Modifying this document. > > ! Majority of active PMC members > > * Voting Timeframes From general-return-2506-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 18:12:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21134 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 18:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 18:12:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 91145 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 18:12:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90997 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 18:12:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90989 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 18:12:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:12:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:12:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 21051 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 18:12:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:12:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFFCA79.3090901@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:12:09 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/07/2010 02:37 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Good, these are technical reasons. The benefits can be cleared by docs. > By incompatible, I assume you mean forward-compatibility of old versions > of Hadoop reading newer files. Can we fix that by having the new > implementation use the old file format by default until it is configured > to use one of the new interfaces for writing? +1 > You keep referring to the kernel as if it were a product. I don't see > a kernel product in the list of things released by Apache Hadoop. The line is fairly clear. The kernel is the daemons plus the framework code that invokes user code. The set of pluggable user implementations is fairly small: InputFormat, OutputFormat, Mapper, Reducer, RawComparator. SequenceFile was originally part of the kernel but is now only used by user-level InputFormats and OutputFormats. > If there were such a product, then it would make sense for Apache Hadoop > to also release ancillary products for common libraries, test frameworks, > and modular storage interfaces. Rearchitecting the Hadoop product suite > into such a logical arrangement would make sense, and after such an > architecture is put into place then "keeping the kernel simple" would > be a reason to veto a change to the kernel. Such a re-arrangement has been proposed but not completed. Relevant issues are MAPREDUCE-1638, MAPREDUCE-1453, and MAPREDUCE-1700. It mostly involves build issues; the architecture already largely supports the distinction. >> Tom long ago provided patches showing how the existing >> configuration system can provide equivalent extension >> implementations outside of the kernel with no incompatible changes. >> (MAPREDUCE-376 and MAPREDUCE-377) > They both seem to be active and unfinished. If they are equivalent fixes > to the same problem, then I suggest applying them to a branch, documenting > how they work, and then agreeing to have a bake-off. A bake-off is a > decision made by performance and feature-completeness as an objective > way to resolve an impasse due to mutually exclusive vetoes. All sides agree > to drop the veto and accept whichever performs best, by majority decision. A bake-off could be a good way to resolve this. Performance differences would not likely be measurable, but folks might examine user programs and consider compatibility and support implications and vote accordingly. > All action items can be voted on. What we are talking about here is a > short term plan, and it is listed as a type of action item under > changes to products. Then voting on specific short-term actions might be a good way to resolve this. Some specific short-term questions we might vote on: 1. Should we add specific versions of Protocol Buffers and Thrift to the classpath of every MapReduce program? 2. Should SequenceFile be forward-compatible, i.e., if an existing program that stores Writables in a SequenceFile is run against the new version, should the old version still be able to read the output of the new version? 3. Should we continue support a specified interchange format and/or data model for configuration data, or should configurations rather be opaque binary data? An interchange format might be JSON. An interchange data model might Map where values can be strings, booleans, numbers, bytes or nested configuration data, defined by a standard API that all configurable items would support. A specified format or model would permit things like using -D to set configuration options and permit generic interaction with external configuration systems. With opaque binary configurations, each configurable item would provide its own API and would require specific new code that calls this API for each parameter that could be set with -D or from an external configuration system. >>> They are also subject to veto if and only if they >>> are to be applied to the current release branch (or a released branch). >> >> Owen intends to merge this patch to a release branch. > > Right. So votes on action items would be simple majority if they're not intended to be merged to a release branch, and vetoable if they are? Is that right? Doug From general-return-2507-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 18:56:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49831 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 18:56:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 18:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 69227 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 18:56:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69146 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 18:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69137 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 18:56:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:56:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:56:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 49756 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 18:55:59 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:55:59 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFFD4BE.9050704@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:55:58 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <0E66662F-E044-4738-8C46-EA0EBCE674E0@yahoo-inc.com> <4CFE6D41.3050809@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/07/2010 10:26 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> I no longer think we should add any new serialization implementations to > the kernel. > > Not clear. Do you propose to keep current serialization(s) and not add new > ones? > Or do you propose to replace current serialization by abstract interfaces > and move implementations to libraries? We can't move existing serialization implementations to an optional library without breaking compatibility. Long-term that might be nice, but I am not proposing that short-term. Short-term I propose we avoid adding new serialization implementations to the default classpath, especially those that add new dependencies to every task. Long-term we might split library code into perhaps a few categories: - mandatory: this might include, e.g., IdentityMapper and IdentityReducer, the default implementations. - back-compatible: the collection of library components that were provided on the default classpath and can be enabled for back-compatible behavior. - optional: components that jobs can optionally depend on. This is where new components that are not mandatory would be added. Doug From general-return-2508-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 19:21:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66066 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 19:21:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 19:21:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3192 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 19:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3120 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 19:21:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3112 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 19:21:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:21:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:21:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 66002 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 19:20:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:20:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4CFFDA8C.2000306@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:20:44 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: <2E0EE1F3-F322-4EDA-95D3-47FE97B34383@yahoo-inc.com> <4CFE6E3C.7010401@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/07/2010 10:25 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The new code reads the new or old versions of SequenceFile seamlessly > using auto-detection of the version. The old code fails with an explicit > message saying that it can't read this version. This is the only > mechanism available when upgrading a file format with a single version > number and is the mechanism that we've used 6 times in the past. The last such change was nearly four years ago, in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-732 The quantity of data stored in SequenceFiles has greatly increased over the past four years. The project's concern for compatibility has also correspondingly increased over that time. The new format version might not be written when folks are using Writable or some other serialization currently supported by SequenceFile. The only situation in your patch where the new version is required is for Avro. You might simply drop support for Avro and leave the file version number alone since Avro already includes a container file format. Or you might only use the new format version for non-class-determined serializations like Avro. Or you might use SequenceFile's existing metadata for non-class-determined serializations like Avro and leave the file version number alone. Doug From general-return-2509-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 20:41:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2076 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 20:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 20:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 51931 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 20:41:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51872 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 20:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51863 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 20:41:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:41:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:41:18 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1073150gyf.35 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:40:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ApcLufbkF0fH4AYULe26zVuFJrrend8SrFHXtxuED2g=; b=bsv3o3DkA45Y7wO05w0NTpt+OfCFNHKHrT1aVcOng2iqhdLugHdUEFlgFQHQ7pu6BV w+Wc4TC45VzmW2t0aBOEaGtc92ELpcVxEd4PlGicuR5cGeTmJJKY7a28Zww21ubsqx8f 6gOyXG0LVi3CIxhbRloEKv2rsnWEpVQVKMZ6U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bTNniZSxTiGBBpMKb/5bPeq5tvLzlPLC9iy45m5+eT8qaycHk7ke1BOczv5y/H8tqZ JPfLH2fFgWlkiNHnXshlP0bwK9iB6uEaxLO9miW2kjlRrZMyMPSTFB1cJr4vktcB7M3R 4Q4QCQMN99Ff/M74MNAJJnyUf0ytmFwjZ7q30= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.75.18 with SMTP id x18mr12270795aga.5.1291840857807; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.78.20 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:40:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:40:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper From: Anthony Urso To: user@zookeeper.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a computing cluster. More information here: https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki and all code is available from: https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via github issues or this email address. Cheers, Anthony From general-return-2510-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 23:16:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78582 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 23:16:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 23:16:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19341 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:16:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19129 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19121 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:16:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:16:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:16:12 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1742907wye.35 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:15:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DjJapUrjBx0PMpz5Ce5I02Sec1CZdIGJJ6yJ2ghBN8o=; b=ifboN63UpXQNBKhHqhTgEUHQIxOk1RfKH9rmVvRbpBKSkhFadR5DRYmSm4Net/qCTH KCZ14hrf9u6MBp+5xiWT5BYsmo36K8V4g5faIT0Gv5g0NvyR0LA0Gh0lnz5+HHWiKFOD gUZljaBC5eTKF0212j3VLUpWp4v6+u+W3dGz4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=DXaiYDN2URM7KYxW1chonDltsVCqoqgHsLHvANCb8DMZoxNkIhBuiafP3jmfr14DhV EoSqCL7hXHBsZExBvNs0rk7U+kPRFoqH12es9tzAntva7wf9tqtkA6IFUgi8xa4lCl2L S9VsfD5EvBv3VFHlYLtlg5spfse023Zpi6tGg= Received: by 10.216.169.6 with SMTP id m6mr1211794wel.49.1291850150712; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:15:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.68 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:15:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:15:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b67c65614980496ee4d84 --0016367b67c65614980496ee4d84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This looks very useful and looks like nice work. I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you are just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a > library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use > Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. > > KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write > distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of > ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. > > The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to > any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes > within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a > computing cluster. > > More information here: > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki > > and all code is available from: > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections > > Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via > github issues or this email address. > > Cheers, > Anthony > --0016367b67c65614980496ee4d84-- From general-return-2511-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 23:41:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89512 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 23:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 23:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 66775 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:41:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66650 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63875 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:37:38 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ewhauser@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KTSKBCB/ag+CLhIKbgaG+wyE2nfjGyu2FG6tfwCY8fI=; b=w03iVAoDVu1dE2dy94UJFzkov1onePX6w7Tl6TNLOos8sbSQAx7PZwS2s2+W0KmT4F ID8nuAbTa2V6MUIaWMGVkrLfcVMRoPAWfOVcbSOGDFw6NsY/b7fkW7PzzidpPrm/soVP UAmU8hiFmTQ6ybTy028SGcZXGU6EIDuTxBF0c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=BZ6BxQowu3m9fKAv0c/ZPkuzMuLWar7y7UcoFJjtv7ziIgegQOAia6I3ETS+pMHA4c hfx7W8dG+gi08dX8Ouq0oICJfYamDjYojh4D/n8ATJtLnmnCAZmnjKDyvf3OKUNXgmXz fhdVjfYJVCWlK5Du4XR08xINYIYQE3AOf/6LQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Eric Hauser Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:33:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: user@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Out of curiosity, why not just use Redis for this? On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > This looks very useful and looks like nice work. > > I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you are > just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a >> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use >> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. >> >> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write >> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of >> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. >> >> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to >> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes >> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a >> computing cluster. >> >> More information here: >> >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki >> >> and all code is available from: >> >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections >> >> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via >> github issues or this email address. >> >> Cheers, >> Anthony >> > From general-return-2512-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 23:44:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90390 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 23:44:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 23:44:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 69859 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:44:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69804 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69796 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:44:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:44:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:44:45 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so1184184yxm.35 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:44:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gqWYB4zuDV6/Fw9WqngMbQmIi8qeC1wvib3Oj9hP3NA=; b=LpuSM/ow3J9HRDM0/5Fm7MZVvW1wteFteR58Bl90sDudR/ezdNc+D8ScxUTZC8J1i2 Fo0fjgkXYtWWAFaPMdi59Kw0Ntq8EKxwB9R8lJC/4G0zhRzEC6wkjmJXXKvhYmRaZ+3I PO3zwNe0ka9BMtL5wn3UOo9gSBOeNOW57GbdU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=U/lJBM2f3+9RqzXVY2LVrRPkNcngzY9C+Y1uaS+GLENnehBVFpQBuhKlJj/nxKZGP+ I3FahXpVlQMmuVBuIdXG/DlLaySJ7/UlcEZeLyETGaynhD4F6mAB5xqnV+fI1MhMf8cc XcF78EmwtIPhqf8GQFN+wxY4DopNv0oHmOjjs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.4.34 with SMTP id 34mr12309616agd.140.1291851864742; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:44:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: anthony.urso@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.78.20 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:44:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:44:24 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vPMA-CzqhH2CIW5f56sFgTi7mSY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper From: Anthony Urso To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: user@zookeeper.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh, thanks for the heads up on the race conditions. I'd like to eliminate them all, so let me know specifics and I will work on them, or just send a patch if you see an obvious solution. Thanks for the feedback! Anthony On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > This looks very useful and looks like nice work. > > I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you are > just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a >> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use >> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. >> >> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write >> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of >> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. >> >> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to >> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes >> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a >> computing cluster. >> >> More information here: >> >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki >> >> and all code is available from: >> >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections >> >> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via >> github issues or this email address. >> >> Cheers, >> Anthony >> > From general-return-2513-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 23:48:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91734 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 23:48:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 23:48:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 76191 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76113 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76080 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:48:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:48:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:48:45 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1191643gyf.35 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:48:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C2oPoXSpY7deqMAeC5iW0S8ul4peUFfktkKLuSZozjE=; b=LXdytWI26oqZAHVtRXSgipYV7WbjRrJP5tgfln/A/XsPKksS1ER2wMKG97roJogUsG IA0Emeex7/ZQanr2GOYEzJJzxA/didx79uVrcKYh1nd2GLt8rzf4o/XNvLZWggs1vVln RqBLKJcbrjU2zpYcrOe4RTlqNmnGXPmvLIf4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=rbH6EXcZCUAlhNMka5ZJdqRh2uyNfynKSs6szerTJZvMnO7npukEd5hE2MroOBDIY3 Q6p4NDvd0clxYBYqf60RpIyknn5it8DnBjVEq117EAt0hpbi7Z2Bnvud4fn+OrkYgENL JQEXNnDAGn5qnTtBRjjabrwjvY1c1QLuaoxj4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.75.18 with SMTP id x18mr12510390aga.5.1291852104030; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:48:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: anthony.urso@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.78.20 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:48:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:48:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QRohcojWjjc0MrwyRM9Ns5RTBYE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper From: Anthony Urso To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: user@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eric: This is pretty different from redis, but a Java Collections interface to redis would be awesome, too. Cheers, Anthony On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eric Hauser wrote: > Out of curiosity, why not just use Redis for this? > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> This looks very useful and looks like nice work. >> >> I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you are >> just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: >> >>> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a >>> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use >>> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. >>> >>> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write >>> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of >>> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. >>> >>> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to >>> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes >>> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a >>> computing cluster. >>> >>> More information here: >>> >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki >>> >>> and all code is available from: >>> >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections >>> >>> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via >>> github issues or this email address. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Anthony >>> >> > From general-return-2514-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 08 23:56:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95545 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2010 23:56:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2010 23:56:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 90016 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:56:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89814 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2010 23:56:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89806 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:56:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:56:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:56:32 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1557019wwd.29 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dghyyqBdacr+oHV7ROzA3x/eRM4kS586dawMzsAtIKc=; b=kA5Qu2QMqD6rb8NwY1g+G2D7R3J24zJjwZWK+ep8LjC+0+v8Cr5fUCqYLcjimdsa6F 7Dynus+/sz/XLSE7jKJmhWJoxGsFRUDUth8DDsMn+qm7UEq6qrR6oDXc5bMUJjJFuX7y lElrgwOl6M3hjUJ1vHC+kcdg8SubzY0tfXZxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=aeZ3kkmkbVMT1YGN7b9S033aC0HjeDRuUTEwWK+uQwgxoGt6yFiWUTq56hjlfG5w+5 5PsEH1l9Zurb47ZVc0UzP/KBx9qqq+AXv7ls11nOgBtxC6YAHEA77SAihS83O5K/UJEQ gJnnWGYp7s86Dg59zAYkNNDmZAD4zqxnEfSTw= Received: by 10.216.162.70 with SMTP id x48mr2649647wek.4.1291852571698; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:56:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.68 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:55:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:55:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44f32a367770496eedd62 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44f32a367770496eedd62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I filed an issue with a description and a suggested alternative. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > Oh, thanks for the heads up on the race conditions. I'd like to > eliminate them all, so let me know specifics and I will work on them, > or just send a patch if you see an obvious solution. > > Thanks for the feedback! > Anthony > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > This looks very useful and looks like nice work. > > > > I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you are > > just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso >wrote: > > > >> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a > >> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use > >> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. > >> > >> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write > >> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of > >> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. > >> > >> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to > >> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes > >> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes > in a > >> computing cluster. > >> > >> More information here: > >> > >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki > >> > >> and all code is available from: > >> > >> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections > >> > >> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via > >> github issues or this email address. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Anthony > >> > > > --001485f44f32a367770496eedd62-- From general-return-2515-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 00:00:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97590 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 00:00:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 00:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1628 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 00:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1482 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 00:00:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98409 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2010 23:58:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gaurav.gs.sharma@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gJ1gyLpI8FQyvvDb5AfYZ8IV4LD70kReLwrGT15TKQM=; b=scvuqPGIqdS11QMLPKgQXJv2z4zGKn4LQnMHqMGBRHowTjgWMldMH15Xm910ctG+M7 dnp2v0l1d2FYW1znawFkfeeTnUOFg+oWdm+4qOrmySsRDDwFv1uwNdoKjQwkOzYaRCuk AVT+cW4rzqIZBoKv54TYpdG8FwLDm5vYjNt2s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=i4YJA08Mbhuu8sfleQRYqKT3FTRTNQWl+uv53GmPZbdbvHRjCg7stI5stwYM7FYfXi 50eHcnCw6y4yvcGkD50lg2MdBtQx0jv4eLwh70C+/rsGObRoaBVPotX7hVRVn8cFtD4h e8/BTeRdA/wmfnvndZVyos0VLGXHu9GWsbukY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Gaurav Sharma Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:58:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364efa26f1fc140496eee514 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364efa26f1fc140496eee514 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For those interested in a Redis Collections implementation, please take a look here: https://github.com/gsharma/johm/tree/master/src/main/java/redis/clients/johm specifically the CollectionMap, CollectionSet, CollectionSortedSet, CollectionList classes. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > Eric: > > This is pretty different from redis, but a Java Collections interface > to redis would be awesome, too. > > Cheers, > Anthony > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eric Hauser wrote: > > Out of curiosity, why not just use Redis for this? > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > >> This looks very useful and looks like nice work. > >> > >> I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you > are > >> just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso >wrote: > >> > >>> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a > >>> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use > >>> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. > >>> > >>> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write > >>> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of > >>> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. > >>> > >>> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to > >>> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes > >>> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes > in a > >>> computing cluster. > >>> > >>> More information here: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki > >>> > >>> and all code is available from: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections > >>> > >>> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via > >>> github issues or this email address. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Anthony > >>> > >> > > > --0016364efa26f1fc140496eee514-- From general-return-2516-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 00:01:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97828 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 00:01:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 00:01:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 3314 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 00:01:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2995 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 00:01:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 00:01:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:01:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gaurav.gs.sharma@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:59 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1560489wwd.29 for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VCEtBDnCv/bl6AVleaFJRD2Q39Rk5ez/q6KR1gYAlOc=; b=Iiu4PAojoVjBj+rBNXrCfGLCbFB3HmDHH59RKuDjOYoSbC21U/K5EDCwWSms5uUFs8 mDdsBfuXn8Y00403aRvNoUOsNd/NQFFq9K9KF47WzdK7lVQ+08MBg+N7qWl8stnd5OWE E6D3LwIRnlw3JyH2owqB1dqE2PsPIQisNse88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AQYVPSjClrjnah5eKJYDyK/AcXcdIW1xIX8Z1hWR/hpgSqsPN1ZbRrlITUrouoOXV0 8N59nkfQakkpUfrvUXiY5EZ6lw32SCLD3R3rCxBgG2ifIiX4nMbl90T9XALpT5oxaufG PFpmXob/OsE9YpmDhjWNemsXoLrKcTWaT22hs= Received: by 10.216.162.84 with SMTP id x62mr120029wek.106.1291852839525; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.62.74 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:00:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gaurav Sharma Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:00:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364580109a1f370496eeed08 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364580109a1f370496eeed08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Forgot to mention that the backing implementations are here: https://github.com/gsharma/johm/tree/master/src/main/java/redis/clients/johm/collections and you can try our JOhm from the latest jar here: https://github.com/downloads/xetorthio/johm/johm-0.4.0.jar On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Gaurav Sharma wrote: > For those interested in a Redis Collections implementation, please take a > look here: > > https://github.com/gsharma/johm/tree/master/src/main/java/redis/clients/johm > > specifically the CollectionMap, CollectionSet, CollectionSortedSet, > CollectionList classes. > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > >> Eric: >> >> This is pretty different from redis, but a Java Collections interface >> to redis would be awesome, too. >> >> Cheers, >> Anthony >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eric Hauser wrote: >> > Out of curiosity, why not just use Redis for this? >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >> >> This looks very useful and looks like nice work. >> >> >> >> I note that the methods used are prone to race conditions, but if you >> are >> >> just thinking about shared maps, this probably isn't important. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso > >wrote: >> >> >> >>> I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a >> >>> library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use >> >>> Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. >> >>> >> >>> KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write >> >>> distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of >> >>> ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. >> >>> >> >>> The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to >> >>> any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes >> >>> within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes >> in a >> >>> computing cluster. >> >>> >> >>> More information here: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki >> >>> >> >>> and all code is available from: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections >> >>> >> >>> Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via >> >>> github issues or this email address. >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Anthony >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > > --0016364580109a1f370496eeed08-- From general-return-2517-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 21:42:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90043 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 21:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 21:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 56001 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 21:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55750 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 21:42:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34678 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 21:27:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of adam.rosien@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/cSIWXYBkfRF7NPIZyxDkCB+iuWMVqnPEikjYlkBNG0=; b=mYHbHn9R7TqY95GTHsIjLIbZR07emSWh6TddvhkTi3j8JMiWYFHmpcj5Fq7mjqAcm4 H2QEdZj8qRzeeIRUN20siuu1KdCIfu3bZ/Gde+dtRpjeiVUpOXk8LYlQUusT25a7CjKH fSVb4n/V/HP8LxiumAraBb1AH4sioNQs7pRVY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=AU135+ZVZhC1AySwcT7/BAQt3sDJb9B4qJO/Qy8FYEjuxx5KC56CoW3TLrc0V4QL9E 2XSOud6eyYXgjMUcSzFldXAFeXJ8SGy2t/6ZVDFpg9PV8bNZbzIe0ZyHXLQDe0YyUvIk IY6oASstGn/uS1OoV4bpqsLPg0TSzKcaGbkEQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam.rosien@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:27:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AaCCglpm6J0tt0RVw3r0qDQjWQM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper From: Adam Rosien To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Making a distributed system look like a collection is a very dubious proposition in my opinion. They are fundamentally different abstractions and reminds me of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_Distributed_Computing. .. Adam On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso wrote: > I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a > library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use > Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. > > KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write > distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of > ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. > > The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to > any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes > within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in a > computing cluster. > > More information here: > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki > > and all code is available from: > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections > > Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via > github issues or this email address. > > Cheers, > Anthony > From general-return-2518-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 22:20:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10521 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 22:20:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 22:20:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18509 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 22:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18453 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 22:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18445 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 22:20:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:20:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.90.71] (HELO nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.90.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:20:36 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 22:20:15 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.160] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 22:20:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 22:20:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 653981.69420.bm@omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 96553 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Dec 2010 22:20:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291933215; bh=T5nHlJM8oH0uqQPTHKU22Z+ImgqkbgjLnoUj8PYZkx0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OF4zJrq10vcqyxxcOEjvkm3bjBMAcarELr1MVSkW30RPX2xEo1kUYLGdv+hu7LwrYBMCCxRCJr0VSiFuMfjkA6Pf5X216u7F5fAmRnYXc9vddXqiQh2G2e4N4icruYwagMXyUSRLopjEO/a/V8kEIlaILWy6G1PuFQlbKZytwVY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BryY8ZNFYoX3S2SpmaEYvLIyMK07dckpy/E8Lt285fy4nSQlU5qJL+QLjVIP4AxbNkWgKPczuNKsz/0IFRT8gz4P8WNXSZELcXKF2rKBoNStCL9GBOr7zMqwUIJdlj1imHRFaQTkcbiaOfiq/vjBnnZv2+u5xA/+9Yj9BorqGkU=; Message-ID: <288424.95491.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xRnNJ6EVM1kJXhShYC8P9dT5QDcUOS3cF85WWaj3fs4sQfe kMZKBjSV_LkcqRqErMudt0sjfWHNN_4kPk1Uyg_vZiureAOv9lyOqbnsNuzv 50yXbu0ESVzM0qfKBwka_MEysigKyjgCvBYXoljoNwC7Bp7E_Ul8ro7o898l iBdZ1P80xhGt0jTTcBGsO19SYSuUbC_b.0Px3HX_P.sJAHIeKIdTkT7T9C28 44GGNlTPXCOXMyi3X8UQbR5P.jG.NQYVYHCcflLDPF6Y.le52uYap52G193t i1ByxNvrwpv4nIQMaKOfm5RGMxTEs0Su9PIlnY.76ezdGXocUwQ-- Received: from [67.180.84.177] by web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:20:14 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:20:14 -0800 (PST) From: C J Subject: Multiple hadoop configurations To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1172938479-1291933214=:95491" --0-1172938479-1291933214=:95491 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of jobs running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one cluster to another. I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one scheduler (so I can coordinate the jobs). I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can I send to one of the 2 clusters. 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a handle to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or something? Will appreciate any help or clues. Thanks. --0-1172938479-1291933214=:95491-- From general-return-2519-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 22:25:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11405 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 22:25:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 22:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 27087 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 22:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27044 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 22:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27036 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 22:25:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:25:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:25:18 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2963321wye.35 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:24:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr2312242wel.104.1291933494879; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:24:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.21.83 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:24:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <288424.95491.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <288424.95491.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:24:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CzotEMnsB4SBYBaHbIPfGpd8Fr4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I believe the answer you are looking for is Oozie coordinator, but I am not which version of it supports multiple clusters. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:20, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of jobs > running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one cluster to > another. > > I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one scheduler > (so I can coordinate the jobs). > > I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can I send > to one of the 2 clusters. > > > 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a handle > to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or > something? > > Will appreciate any help or clues. > > Thanks. > > > > From general-return-2520-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 23:02:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54870 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 23:02:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 23:02:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 78791 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 23:02:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78747 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 23:02:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78737 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 23:02:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:02:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.209] (HELO nm15-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:01:55 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.65] by nm15.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 23:01:34 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.13] by tm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 23:01:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Dec 2010 23:01:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 952989.40101.bm@omp1013.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12566 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Dec 2010 23:01:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291935693; bh=nz6x81XnKXJK/7+DF+j8NnLYeeiRYodIUcqlo9rfMU8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0hlWBDg/m9OaBb1b0GBLbjpUXTSh72SKV8EW+mIEGPtMEhH0OITCFOSXpPAlmdxrFe6HII4IOy0pvdbdStBJSVH4qz1KB9vI9B//kzKX8r0edzNZhElED8kq3e9OaoTqbY9wizIEmpaw7DRE8T7kQ767aZfu4gqhbZhR6bgEqJ8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N6GUYbeYwjLaNNg2zvRSkHXgdp+MITJjPAIyXklS8mbRoZl3g+/u4BhhzWQxSTX6CTS/JFLavtlCPNCSp0q2eZYPz+SvnWVIPtf460+FzAFASA8W/BIszIhzd9s3PV1j7i79meR5dEhBaJSQKi8go7QJc6OmE5R+OmCosIVp7eg=; Message-ID: <422363.10927.qm@web114517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3uGcZL0VM1mAfgiki69fPYVrRXELfs.9mQhOEjGmDq5PWQ_ liE_7WyelZrmsG51Rub5yHdk5_gY.NWxzDMLjbl9jt.OqVZTP5rxRaYkOqYq y2OKCJ5C57K.4XIrxAgdYGdPcYarWBb4gB0jqMLthATp6Zg7dge9FmSflf8S EHH0O.ojsIlpU9Nh4pJK6WBRggGtwOWLN94kH6jfZpJnSCvkAVRGM4xr.Jpu _ddp.9rTf97FxX3_4ws22oRHQ5fuORAIBh4vSLqYobGJNPl0YmQAWnNxvut1 cQps2tiAx4pR6bIewaPL9eEJv0Pq3QL_nbFOke.J.YD1JEsAoHg-- Received: from [67.180.84.177] by web114517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:01:32 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <288424.95491.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:01:32 -0800 (PST) From: C J Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1403983603-1291935692=:10927" --0-1403983603-1291935692=:10927 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Konstantin. My issue is more with supporting the multiple clusters . I am using quartz for scheduling the jobs (currently it is 2 separate schedulers for the 2 clusters). If while submitting a job I am able to specify which cluster it should trigger the job on (by giving the handle to the appropriate cluster), I think I will be able to manage it. Thanks, Deepika ________________________________ From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 2:24:34 PM Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations I believe the answer you are looking for is Oozie coordinator, but I am not which version of it supports multiple clusters. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:20, C J wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of jobs > running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one cluster to > another. > > I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one >scheduler > (so I can coordinate the jobs). > > I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can I send > to one of the 2 clusters. > > > 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a handle > to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or > something? > > Will appreciate any help or clues. > > Thanks. > > > > --0-1403983603-1291935692=:10927-- From general-return-2521-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 09 23:23:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68595 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 23:23:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 23:23:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 99090 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99014 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98878 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:23:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:22:55 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2781626wwd.29 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:22:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=2ROuq9G0xn1CaeK2Uo30djgc8U9MHT5JSLGECcaX/Kc=; b=Bz+YuC9duXFBUKjdXxVLPVGYgwF3pTc2Zi3ng6ZRsvJWf0XiBHCzyQ+HktyhjQr4fh AvkWYCMjzrrnMsoe3MH8LoMg4RJn0WytUo+d/qUWJJVVUBENtguT4CJdWmgC3RCpM0b3 HuYcWchqM6RGaRSy4BR/Vj1svzC/xjtcQx0Is= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AwDhVWDqK1h0ya5ldiowFw+BHQTXoscvbh8GmjiWIAFm6tYblCccK9XrKabDgNd3xa H63r/BKQ7x2npJpJfsgGRTR0V0XzEQxi6R7INnQnTSB8I2Ywlf53VQywIOsGn71mAaei +RxE9l2xvZRNGYjvp48uXkS+4hBpnkSvWhd6w= Received: by 10.216.162.70 with SMTP id x48mr1273070wek.4.1291936955467; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:22:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.158.68 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:22:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:22:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44f324d87f7049702830a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44f324d87f7049702830a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It definitely can go that way. But some things are pretty nicely viewed that way. For instance, wouldn't it be nice to have a "live processes" set in different programs? Of course, you have to want watch for race conditions and you can't really believe it is the same from moment to moment. But with those caveats, it would be *really* nice. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Adam Rosien wrote: > Making a distributed system look like a collection is a very dubious > proposition in my opinion. They are fundamentally different > abstractions and reminds me of > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_Distributed_Computing. > > .. Adam > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso > wrote: > > I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a > > library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use > > Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. > > > > KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write > > distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of > > ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. > > > > The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to > > any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes > > within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes in > a > > computing cluster. > > > > More information here: > > > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki > > > > and all code is available from: > > > > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections > > > > Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via > > github issues or this email address. > > > > Cheers, > > Anthony > > > --001485f44f324d87f7049702830a-- From general-return-2522-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 10 01:10:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25806 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 01:10:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 01:10:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 55542 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 01:10:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55387 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 01:10:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25719 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 00:46:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of adam.rosien@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=avAZwt0uH05asaEft3RyOseWxefCRgK/3AGnQom6OY0=; b=bpUzezYw4BdnZIeXrkeSIZBsfvySTo2Voqp+6KmI9Y/Y/xCmcgDf3L0eA8gHBjxKiv aTtU/n1nQSY7gX/62T5a9JM1RKrI3pVAb8fF1Uvyz4O3+H7qVUcluLBDkilKUv1Bv4J6 YMXqDdPbQWZKluj4aDSEYYDK+GYOGj9s0thpc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ThhBI+5Dp2cGb4Y12fKgSxELveSK/1C9Zkpi8NchA/feeG+OL+tCfirc3WgoSBkfpG syqKRRI8H9Tmtmc95zmqNJu6tbbY5/bkx4h03nZgT8rR6lN0tKW0boiwipQlWuyWJgHf PEymLiJ9DQyAwEz0tDeTQCPsC19IsbwvExmus= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam.rosien@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:46:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uyVFESgqo3kd6X-b8v7duHbTTXc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Announcing KeptCollections, distributed Java Collections for ZooKeeper From: Adam Rosien To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Cc: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, perhaps I was a bit harsh. In my own systems I specifically create new types that hold zk-managed data structures, e.g. ZkSynced, to inform clients that the semantics are different. You can get copies of the current value which lets clients know the value may change at any point. .. Adam On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > It definitely can go that way. > > But some things are pretty nicely viewed that way. =A0For instance, would= n't > it be nice to have a "live processes" set in different programs? =A0Of co= urse, > you have to want watch for race conditions and you can't really believe i= t > is the same from moment to moment. =A0But with those caveats, it would be > *really* nice. > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Adam Rosien wrote: > >> Making a distributed system look like a collection is a very dubious >> proposition in my opinion. They are fundamentally different >> abstractions and reminds me of >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_Distributed_Computing. >> >> .. Adam >> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Urso >> wrote: >> > I am pleased to announce the initial release of KeptCollections, a >> > library of drop-in replacements for standard Java Collections that use >> > Apache ZooKeeper as a backing store. >> > >> > KeptCollections are designed to make it easy for anyone to write >> > distributed applications without having to learn the intricacies of >> > ZooKeeper, or distributed programming in general. >> > >> > The collections use the well-known JDK APIs, yet any changes made to >> > any of these collections by one node are seen by all other nodes >> > within milliseconds, allowing for easy communication between processes= in >> a >> > computing cluster. >> > >> > More information here: >> > >> > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections/wiki >> > >> > and all code is available from: >> > >> > https://github.com/anthonyu/KeptCollections >> > >> > Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via >> > github issues or this email address. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Anthony >> > >> > From general-return-2523-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 10 01:17:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27181 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 01:17:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 01:17:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 64105 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 01:17:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63978 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 01:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63970 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 01:17:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:17:23 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so2065674eyz.35 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:17:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.7.2 with SMTP id b2mr44660ebb.38.1291943823148; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:17:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.145 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:16:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <422363.10927.qm@web114517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <288424.95491.qm@web114514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <422363.10927.qm@web114517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:16:31 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Deepika, If both of your clusters run the same version of Hadoop, then -as Konstantin suggested- you could use Oozie. Oozie does not rely on local Hadoop configuration files to determine the JT/NN to use, you specify them in the Oozie workflow application XML for each job. Cheers. Alejandro On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, C J wrote: > Thanks Konstantin. My issue is more with supporting the multiple clusters . I am > using quartz for scheduling the jobs (currently it is 2 separate schedulers for > the 2 clusters). > > > If while submitting a job I am able to specify which cluster it should trigger > the job on (by giving the handle to the appropriate cluster), I think I will be > able to manage it. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Konstantin Boudnik > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 2:24:34 PM > Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations > > I believe the answer you are looking for is Oozie coordinator, but I > am not which version of it supports multiple clusters. > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:20, C J wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of jobs >> running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one cluster to >> another. >> >> I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one >>scheduler >> (so I can coordinate the jobs). >> >> I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can I > send >> to one of the 2 clusters. >> >> >> 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a > handle >> to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or >> something? >> >> Will appreciate any help or clues. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> > > > > From general-return-2524-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 10 04:37:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84656 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 04:37:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (::) by ::ffff:140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 04:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 94469 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 04:37:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94239 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 04:37:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94229 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 04:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:37:22 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oBA4adBH046536 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:36:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291955800; bh=7t+cDH0I6Q4NzChw2nRzMPKwkYqSg+IpYixNwdAGJkc=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=jhgz64+5k+rBysmq1mfpwtWLvEmenzD4j1zlPBhqp5eI83kgfebbju3c089ncJrmb 2v9Pi0wYrOoAwVnuEr6c3zNwtKgSpAddvZRNoLIoTjr8PWlYM/0LLFFcrTGojOSFAx iWSLQ0sc3EMOvhNQK3KBVCT5jV2mhoOFuDoNtGx0= Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:06:39 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:06:29 +0530 Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations Thread-Topic: Multiple hadoop configurations Thread-Index: AcuYCBpsaHt3cv0IQwOPsFTDgRClxAAG7WDM Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C927AC254939Csvenkatyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C927AC254939Csvenkatyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you are not running the same version, you could use Reverse Class Loader= trick to be able to launch jobs to multiple clusters. -Venkatesh On 12/10/10 6:46 AM, "Alejandro Abdelnur" wrote: Deepika, If both of your clusters run the same version of Hadoop, then -as Konstantin suggested- you could use Oozie. Oozie does not rely on local Hadoop configuration files to determine the JT/NN to use, you specify them in the Oozie workflow application XML for each job. Cheers. Alejandro On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, C J wrote: > Thanks Konstantin. My issue is more with supporting the multiple clusters= . I am > using quartz for scheduling the jobs (currently it is 2 separate schedule= rs for > the 2 clusters). > > > If while submitting a job I am able to specify which cluster it should tr= igger > the job on (by giving the handle to the appropriate cluster), I think I w= ill be > able to manage it. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Konstantin Boudnik > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 2:24:34 PM > Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations > > I believe the answer you are looking for is Oozie coordinator, but I > am not which version of it supports multiple clusters. > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:20, C J wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of job= s >> running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one clus= ter to >> another. >> >> I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one >>scheduler >> (so I can coordinate the jobs). >> >> I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can= I > send >> to one of the 2 clusters. >> >> >> 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a > handle >> to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or >> something? >> >> Will appreciate any help or clues. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> > > > > --_000_C927AC254939Csvenkatyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2525-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 10 08:05:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72052 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 08:05:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 08:05:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 31404 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 08:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31095 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 08:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31077 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 08:05:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:05:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.86] (HELO nm16.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.86) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:05:01 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm16.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2010 08:04:39 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.54] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2010 08:04:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1054.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2010 08:04:39 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 443446.55936.bm@omp1054.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57095 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2010 08:04:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1291968279; bh=F3CSm+4C0g0IVQsUmiIqzvaAkrPlqoZQhvBZYvZSszs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yiwSahq9nBgErwh7bCabzSqkprZ5JhiMNaFQ09uEvhrtaSnY2e2QXB5x0vOD/9KYTuNEtQlh312AeuPe4LuN3gR5D5bO+jyNYoJlx9CCoQyR4AryX+YpvzNlfgaEdRbYFEQs9dV8tBoLZwClBDXgv+Il6uz5GOcnASWZ7LVCEns= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yDdOK17z9ejDfZ9omhfdM30JyXERp9PfGMIJZOQgFoDrYELi7QwWR3MIiEp1vNdZrH+9t3e2H5M2adacUSgiUHr3SvPA2mL/WK+pWiZHUUaCb/wOVtGqckw8mvhfID5yaqoCE24Lz6p7oPXIAD3Iuf364ZtO12PojlUpvQiEyg4=; Message-ID: <29834.55843.qm@web114506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 8NLKPxQVM1lxhkpWhKIJSS._pVORbMJpRJewhl07RtteMVO BFwMSTk8voJ5TStTj4yx1bS44o4AaOd.7vFwO4BO_EW9ecbGSYC23irIAg96 tc9lSm1DbVQ7QD9SsUYFd5D5mOqBVpa_6MWJGruxiTSQH2TufL_Vq2iW79ON SGpP0NvlXYbUbyQaEcYFZs.zj98VZTWwiPVXF95nYVNQEz6W9lh4Cb1rEbFd afkJm0LQna6RH13ZHnnp1SKvDSRNY2uiAYD5_2zliKHMo6fLWb97MQhIfADN HLTdwz_Uw8YoAwEv8wUQ7OQ303MipbYK4TIqe_Uw1LwJPb2RDVw-- Received: from [67.180.84.177] by web114506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:04:38 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:04:38 -0800 (PST) From: C J Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-163395178-1291968278=:55843" --0-163395178-1291968278=:55843 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks everyone. I do have the same version of hadoop on both clusters. And oozie does seem to be the best option to get what I need. - C ________________________________ From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 8:36:29 PM Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations If you are not running the same version, you could use Reverse Class Loader trick to be able to launch jobs to multiple clusters. -Venkatesh On 12/10/10 6:46 AM, "Alejandro Abdelnur" wrote: Deepika, If both of your clusters run the same version of Hadoop, then -as Konstantin suggested- you could use Oozie. Oozie does not rely on local Hadoop configuration files to determine the JT/NN to use, you specify them in the Oozie workflow application XML for each job. Cheers. Alejandro On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, C J wrote: > Thanks Konstantin. My issue is more with supporting the multiple clusters . I >am > using quartz for scheduling the jobs (currently it is 2 separate schedulers for > the 2 clusters). > > > If while submitting a job I am able to specify which cluster it should trigger > the job on (by giving the handle to the appropriate cluster), I think I will be > able to manage it. > > Thanks, > Deepika > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Konstantin Boudnik > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 2:24:34 PM > Subject: Re: Multiple hadoop configurations > > I believe the answer you are looking for is Oozie coordinator, but I > am not which version of it supports multiple clusters. > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:20, C J wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have 2 hadoop clusters . Both these clusters have their own set of jobs >> running. I also have some distcp jobs which copy over data from one cluster to >> another. >> >> I want to be able to control the jobs on both the clusters through one >>scheduler >> (so I can coordinate the jobs). >> >> I am wondering when I need to trigger a job through a scheduler, how can I > send >> to one of the 2 clusters. >> >> >> 2 clusters means 2 sets of configuration files.Is there any way to get a > handle >> to one of these clusters, by specifying the configuration file name or >> something? >> >> Will appreciate any help or clues. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> > > > > --0-163395178-1291968278=:55843-- From general-return-2526-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 12 12:00:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16690 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2010 11:59:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Dec 2010 11:59:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 17379 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2010 11:59:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17064 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2010 11:59:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2010 11:59:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:59:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tu219717@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.178] (HELO mail-px0-f178.google.com) (209.85.212.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:59:47 +0000 Received: by pxi9 with SMTP id 9so1779044pxi.37 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rBWbv7SmlQFjldsffHsuRfijjPPNPHVtL+iyKWb7JsE=; b=NO3gDV5/kj7jQpeHCuT2PpgFHK2Mhog+R5Yn1zDEATzMEeWhUcM9xH8+5cYNWyaiXG I6t5PoCYGaF9Myw+eaNGDjcwqSDmCz/f/T9ESsXesZihT2uy0RfYAw/M9w0sC7wI+aGG tdN756TdFYo3WaKamW5ApQ1WzizAnIaQzww9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Gf27cpgXgS8QeG8nP3Or1DlS0BImpDepvCOke8vyPcmk7o2tzJN1O1IIpbEnSceWw2 sdYr+I+k862oCgV1n12GgmkucnXGrDJkOoIJqPM2E88nBcHVMLYgBoqBxB39jD7Px7i5 K1v49g3vP5HCDOxzoJpLguimxIdIZczZckIM4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.50.3 with SMTP id x3mr1738909wfx.120.1292155164549; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.3.18 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:59:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:59:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Problem with links to "Read-only default configuration" From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Tomasz_Uli=F1ski?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I am browsing default configurations of past releases and there is a problem with links to "read-only default configuration" files. E.g. On the page: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/cluster_setup.html#Configuration+Files the following links: src/core/core-default.xml src/hdfs/hdfs-default.xml src/mapred/mapred-default.xml point to the "current" version, not r0.20.2 It is not only problem with r0.20.2 release, but also with others. Could you fix it? Best Regards, Tomek From general-return-2527-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 13 17:29:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10562 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2010 17:29:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Dec 2010 17:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 29638 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2010 17:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29544 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2010 17:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29536 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2010 17:29:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:29:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of billmcn@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:29:38 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so6793768qwh.35 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=75XCDyxrEKcSUQVH5hJHMbiYGJ8Z+2ZTDYNc0tYrRHs=; b=GPUEH75kPEU1z+iR2qWQKS1mPVxMIK62ChA3YMhxfWgXVX4Wv9AJvq+f6a4z4Bq70q ekzjWdsKlUITUrTo1Fk5ZQmhKXxdzpP1ljps/p4vz0DPCirS6doF9evXXymwAzsuFDSP L0P1VRjYjF2oOjosC8D2kvNkQ/zmHF7rDyjTU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=INFjrWPvz8x8qfOEclm+sAlJEeY7bLcr8cFWAKD5xxI9dhMhgP3VBf2cA286zAZ5ZK 2N+M+vmk9gj4k9yixIHIRZJMWKpmZI011DNinVgkOD5SAwcFs5SkJwYs9Ddk0ZBRVGiG LkeKmZ9djv2WRaoVl0dbYV9cWc3DAXnGz6+ls= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.80.135 with SMTP id t7mr4318972qak.11.1292261357307; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.102.193 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: How do I log from my map/reduce application? From: "W.P. McNeill" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb05228c9a504974e0b74 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cb05228c9a504974e0b74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would like to use Hadoop's Log4j infrastructure to do logging from my map/reduce application. I think I've got everything set up correctly, but I am still unable to specify the logging level I want. By default Hadoop is set up to log at level INFO. The first line of its log4j.properties file looks like this: hadoop.root.logger=INFO,console I have an application whose reducer looks like this: package com.me; public class MyReducer<...> extends Reducer<...> { private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(MyReducer.class.getName()); ... protected void reduce(...) { logger.debug("My message"); ... } } I've added the following line to the Hadoop log4j.properties file: log4j.logger.com.me.MyReducer=DEBUG I expect the Hadoop system to log at level INFO, but my application to log at level DEBUG, so that I see "My message" in the logs for the reducer task. However, my application does not produce any log4j output. If I change the line in my reducer to read logger.info("My message") the message does get logged, so somehow I'm failing to specify that log level for this class. I've also tried changing the log4j line for my app to read log4j.logger.com.me.MyReducer=DEBUG,console and get the same result. I've been through the Hadoop and log4j documentation and I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Any suggestions? Thanks. --0015175cb05228c9a504974e0b74-- From general-return-2528-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 03:09:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14828 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 03:09:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 03:09:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 57395 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 03:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56915 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 03:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56899 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 03:09:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:09:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:09:19 +0000 Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ipye1f0151zF43QA4r8yoM; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:08:58 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ir8w1f00g1GAoR68kr8xPG; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:08:57 +0000 Message-Id: <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:08:56 -0800 References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> The proposal is to change the extension mechanism incompatibly with >> unclear benefits, > > Good, these are technical reasons. The benefits can be cleared by > docs. > By incompatible, I assume you mean forward-compatibility of old > versions > of Hadoop reading newer files. Can we fix that by having the new > implementation use the old file format by default until it is > configured > to use one of the new interfaces for writing? There are two goals here. The first is to extend the serialization plugin interface. The current patch does things completely compatibly including a shim that will use the previous plugins to satisfy the new API. The benefits are also clear. Avro serialization is possible when it wasn't previously. It also provides a wide range of opportunities that weren't previously possible. The file format was changed as a demonstration that the serialization interface was useful and complete. The file change is also backwards compatible and will automatically read old versions of the file. Old versions of the code will complain with an error message if they are given a new version. This is exactly the pattern we have used in the past. So, no there are no technical issues with the patch as it stands. > You keep referring to the kernel as if it were a product. I don't see > a kernel product in the list of things released by Apache Hadoop. The kernel is a very loosely defined concept. Utilities that are currently used by the framework are "kernel" others are just used by the users. Some classes are clearly kernel and some are clearly library, but there are some such as BooleanWritable that aren't obvious. It would take a fair amount of work and likely some duplication to segregate out the library code. I also worry that creating such a project would make Hadoop less useful out of the box and decrease the value of the Apache release of Hadoop. But back to the original point. Doug's (and Tom's) veto was based on: 1. Modification to SequenceFile. 2. It introduces a dependence on Protocol Buffers. There was strong consensus that SequenceFile was required and should be updated as the framework evolves. The second is not a technical reason. I believe that the entire veto should be considered invalid. -- Owen From general-return-2529-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 04:49:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39064 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 04:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 04:49:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 19509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 04:49:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19128 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 04:49:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19116 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 04:49:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:49:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:49:38 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so135024ywo.35 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:49:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.110.162 with SMTP id u22mr10140796yhg.51.1292302157359; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.111.45 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:49:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:49:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c9b082a0a0497578bc1 --0023547c8c9b082a0a0497578bc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > The proposal is to change the extension mechanism incompatibly with >>> unclear benefits, >>> >> >> Good, these are technical reasons. The benefits can be cleared by docs. >> By incompatible, I assume you mean forward-compatibility of old versions >> of Hadoop reading newer files. Can we fix that by having the new >> implementation use the old file format by default until it is configured >> to use one of the new interfaces for writing? >> > > > There are two goals here. The first is to extend the serialization plugin > interface. The current patch does things completely compatibly including a > shim that will use the previous plugins to satisfy the new API. The benefits > are also clear. Avro serialization is possible when it wasn't previously. It > also provides a wide range of opportunities that weren't previously > possible. > > The file format was changed as a demonstration that the serialization > interface was useful and complete. The file change is also backwards > compatible and will automatically read old versions of the file. Old > versions of the code will complain with an error message if they are given a > new version. This is exactly the pattern we have used in the past. > > So, no there are no technical issues with the patch as it stands. One of the technical issues is the fact that this precludes users from using PB (or thrift or avro) in their jobs if the version required conflicts with what Hadoop proper has on the classpath. We've already seen these kinds of conflicts with other libraries in the wild and I would like to minimize this possibility in the future. Was there something in the patch that addressed this (I may have missed it; only did a cursory scan through)? Jumping back to the "non-technical" issue, I really think it would help to develop a course of action for resolution similar to what I suggested earlier. It doesn't need to be specifically what I suggested, but I do think that consensus building and conflict resolution are in the best interest of the community. I feel like we could debate what people said, did, meant, or the specifics of this issue for a long time. Thanks and regards. -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0023547c8c9b082a0a0497578bc1-- From general-return-2530-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 05:25:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53291 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 05:25:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 05:25:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 37265 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36793 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36223 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 05:23:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:23:01 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Mesos Project From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e89aab1eb9804975803e5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e89aab1eb9804975803e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thought this may be of interest to people on this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matei Zaharia Date: Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:08 AM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Mesos Project To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Benjamin Hindman , Andy Konwinski < andyk@berkeley.edu>, Ali Ghodsi We would like to propose Mesos as an incubator proposal. Mesos is a resource manager for clusters that provides resource sharing and isolation across distributed applications like Apache Hadoop, MPI, or web applications. It started as a research project at UC Berkeley, but is now being used both by other Berkeley groups and at Twitter. We open sourced Mesos in August and would like to grow a broader community around it. Our proposal is included below and available on the wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MesosProposal. We look forward to hearing feedback and questions on the proposal. Also, let us know if you're interested in being a mentor. Thanks, Matei Zaharia, Benjamin Hindman, Andy Konwinski, and Ali Ghodsi = Abstract = Mesos is a cluster manager that provides resource sharing and isolation across cluster applications. = Proposal = Mesos is system for sharing resources between cluster applications such as Hadoop MapReduce, HBase, MPI, and web applications. It is motivated by three use cases. First, organizations that use several of these applications can use Mesos to share nodes between them, increasing utilization and simplifying management. Second, inspired by MapReduce, a wide array of new cluster programming frameworks are being proposed, such as Apache Hama, Microsoft Dryad, and Google's Pregel and Caffeine. Mesos provides a common interface for such frameworks to share resources, allowing organizations to use multiple frameworks in the same cluster. Third, Mesos allows users of a framework such as Hadoop to have multiple instances of the framework on the same cluster, facilitating workload isolation and incremental deployment of upgrades. = Background = Mesos was inspired by operational issues experienced in large Apache Hadoop deployments as well as a desire to provide a management system for a wider range of cluster applications. The Apache Hadoop community has long realized that the current model of having one instance of MapReduce control a whole cluster leads to problems with isolation (one job may cause the master to crash, killing all the other jobs), scalability, and software upgrades (an upgrade must be deployed on the whole cluster). Statically partitioning resources into multiple fixed-size MapReduce clusters is unattractive because it lowers both utilization and data locality. The community has discussed a two-level scheduling model where a simple, robust low-level layer enables multiple applications to launch tasks (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279). Mesos is such a layer, with the additional goal of supporting non-Hadoop applications as well. Mesos started as a research project at UC Berkeley, but is now being tested at several companies (including Twitter and Facebook), and has attracted interest from other industry users and researchers as well. We are therefore proposing to place Mesos in the Apache incubator and build an open source community around it. = Rationale = Although a variety of cluster schedulers (e.g. Torque, Sun Grid Engine) already exist in the scientific computing community, they are not well suited for today's data center environment. These schedulers generally give jobs coarse-grained static allocations of the cluster (e.g. X nodes for the full duration of the job). This is problematic because many cluster applications are elastic (can scale up and down), so utilization is not optimal under static partitioning, and because data-intensive applications such as MapReduce need to run a few tasks on every node of the cluster to read data locally. To address these challenges, Mesos is designed around two principles: * Fine-grained sharing: Mesos allocates resources at the level of "tasks" within a job, allowing applications to scale up and down over time and to take turns accessing data on cluster nodes. * Application-controlled scheduling: Applications control which nodes their tasks run on, allowing them to achieve placement goals such as data locality. In addition to these principles, Mesos is designed to be simple, scalable and robust, becuase a cluster manager must be highly available to support applications and should not become a bottleneck. Application-controlled scheduling already simplifies our design by pushing much of the complex logic of tracking job state to applications. In addition, Mesos employs an optimized C++ message-passing library to achieve scalability and supports master failover using Apache ZooKeeper. Mesos already supports running Hadoop and MPI. We plan to add support for other systems as requested (and contributed) by the community. = Current Status = == Meritocracy == Our intent with this incubator proposal is to start building a diverse developer community around Mesos following the Apache meritocracy model. We have wanted to make the project open source and encourage contributors from multiple organizations from the start. We plan to provide plenty of support to new developers and to quickly recruit those who make solid contributions to committer status. == Community == Mesos is currently being used by developers at Twitter and researchers in computer science and civil engineering at Berkeley. We hope to extend the user and developer base further in the future. The current developers and users are all interested in building a solid open source community around Mesos. To work towards an open source community, we have been using the GitHub issue tracker and mailing lists at Berkeley for development discussions within our group for several months now. == Core Developers == Mesos was started by three graduate students at UC Berkeley (Benjamin Hindman, Andy Konwinski and Matei Zaharia), who were soon joined by a postdoc from the Swedish Institute of Computer Science (Ali Ghodsi). Although started as a research project, Mesos was always intended to solve operational issues with large clusters and to become an open-source project, building on our successful experience doing research that has been incorporated into Apache Hadoop (several scheduling algorithms). == Alignment == The ASF is a natural host for Mesos given that it is already the home of Hadoop, HBase, Cassandra, and other emerging cloud software projects. Mesos was designed to support Hadoop from the beginning in order to solve operational challenges in Hadoop clusters, and it aims to support a wide range of applications beyond Hadoop as well. Mesos complements the existing Apache cloud computing projects by providing a unified way to manage these systems and to share resources and data between them. = Known Risks = == Orphaned Products == With the current core developers of Mesos being graduate students, there is a risk that these developers will eventually move on to other projects. However, because of the broad scope of Mesos, we all plan to continue working on projects related to it in the next several years. We are also actively working with developers at other organizations, such as Twitter, who are good candidates to become contributors. == Inexperience with Open Source == All of the core developers are active users and followers of open source. Matei Zaharia is a Hadoop committer and has experience with the Apache infrastructure and development process. Andy Konwinski has contributed patches to Hadoop through the Apache infrastructure as well. Ali Ghodsi has released open source software as part of his PhD work that was adopted by a Swedish company. == Homogeneous Developers == The current core developers are all researchers (graduate students and a young professor). However, we hope to establish a developer community that includes contributors from several corporations, and we are already working towards this with Twitter and Facebook. == Reliance on Salaried Developers == Given that the project started in an academic research environment, the core developers are all interested in it primarily for its own sake rather than for the sake of employment. We all intend to continue working on Mesos as volunteers. == Relationships with Other Apache Products == Mesos needs to work well with Hadoop, HBase, and other cloud software projects. Being hosted on the same infrastructure will facilitate this and ultimately help out both Mesos and the projects that can now be managed using it. There is, however, a risk that new projects will be built to run solely on Mesos, introducing a dependency. == An Excessive Fascination with the Apache Brand == While we respect the reputation of the Apache brand and have no doubts that it will attract contributors and users, our interest is primarily to give Mesos a solid home as an open source project following an established development model. Locating the project in Apache will also facilitate collaboration with Hadoop, HBase, and other Apache cluster computing projects, as discussed in the Alignment section. = Documentation = Information about Mesos can be found at http://mesos.berkeley.edu. The following sources may be useful to start with: * Documentation for GitHub release: http://github.com/mesos/mesos/wiki * Presentation at Hadoop User Group: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~matei/talks/2010/hug_mesos.pdf * Tech report on system design and current features: http://mesos.berkeley.edu/mesos_tech_report.pdf (paper to appear at NSDI 2011 conference) = Initial Source = Mesos has been under development since spring 2009 by a team of graduate students and researchers. It is currently hosted on GitHub under a BSD license at http://github.com/mesos/mesos. = External Dependencies = The dependencies all have Apache compatible licenses, including BSD, MIT, Boost, and Apache 2.0. = Cryptography = Not applicable. = Required Resources = == Mailing Lists == * mesos-private for private PMC discussions (with moderated subscriptions) * mesos-dev * mesos-commits * mesos-user == Subversion Directory == https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos == Issue Tracking == JIRA Mesos (MESOS) == Other Resources == The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added after project creation. = Initial Committers = * Ali Ghodsi (ali at sics dot se) * Benjamin Hindman (benh at eecs dot berkeley dot edu) * Andy Konwinski (andyk at eecs dot berkeley dot edu) * Matei Zaharia (matei at apache dot org) A CLA is already on file for Matei Zaharia. = Affiliations = * Ali Ghodsi (UC Berkeley / Swedish Institute of Computer Science) * Benjamin Hindman (UC Berkeley) * Andy Konwinski (UC Berkeley) * Matei Zaharia (UC Berkeley) = Sponsors = == Champion == Tom White == Nominated Mentors == * Dhruba Borthakur * Brian McCallister * Tom White == Sponsoring Entity == Incubator PMC --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org --90e6ba6e89aab1eb9804975803e5-- From general-return-2531-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 05:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53918 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 05:27:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 05:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 41532 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:27:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41434 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:27:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36281 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 05:24:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sangee.sha@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=k7FH+TfQWezheg0LGFdzmxfLzneBzBMI4okrUUZCQLs=; b=IxYCasIjDrCYO2J7/Xh3TywjWx8vfdn/YTHSfpTSpKw6LcgXwmLWsVMbkfqhcIDKTA zQLF4Rva+EUqjQPXAMNehMqlXLcomURXCwCU/EUIj0lXnIl8SITezC5N7AcRsrukhEWU ujNcZ6wdqwlcXu9FiJcR4pAa02aqznKBBx2vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wh1wP35JndLLTVcCBSVIfOLTaSAJOwgtxNVhWlsYP1grQxtLWXRx/ucKe+u2kgY1P6 Ca4yxuxMR8QcqmBr26pQmPLf4J4hP3hvX0f2UMtp4juichwDJCbLkz3ETQtDL7TxY429 wLtxHyzTsTxB/bHHKSLZzfPKvOOUAG7rfwTjE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:53:53 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Using Sqoop with Hive From: sangeetha s To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5baf9cd7905049758066b --001636c5baf9cd7905049758066b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Currently I am working with hadoop+ hive from apache distribution. Since I am in need to transfer data from myql to hive , I wish to use sqoop with hadoop. While doing so I was instructed to use cloud era's distribution of Hadoop.But I don't want to switch from Apache distribution to CDH. Is there any other way to download sqoop,I wish to stay with the existing setup (Hadoop+Hive).? Kindly tell me your suggestions. Thank you, -- Regards, Sangita S. --001636c5baf9cd7905049758066b-- From general-return-2532-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 05:44:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70047 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 05:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 05:44:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 53763 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:44:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53481 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53460 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 05:44:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:44:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.211] (HELO QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:44:10 +0000 Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id itdX1f00227AodY5Btjqsb; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:43:50 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([98.234.216.58]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id itjp1f0021GAoR63ftjqVw; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:43:50 +0000 Message-Id: <6974FEB1-0E72-4FBF-8196-BF4B4E4D77BC@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:43:47 -0800 References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > One of the technical issues is the fact that this precludes users > from using > PB (or thrift or avro) in their jobs if the version required > conflicts with > what Hadoop proper has on the classpath. This is currently true of all of our libraries and is addressed by MAPREDUCE-1938. After that is committed, users who want to override to a newer version just need to configure their job to do so. Using a new library, just because it is a serialization library other than Avro, is not an acceptable reason to veto a patch. -- Owen From general-return-2533-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 05:50:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70777 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 05:50:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 05:50:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 58256 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:50:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57893 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 05:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57884 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 05:50:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:49:57 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so312306qyk.14 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:49:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.238.16 with SMTP id kq16mr4460318qcb.134.1292305775943; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:49:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:49:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:49:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using Sqoop with Hive From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: sqoop-user@cloudera.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Sangita, You can download a release tarball from the Sqoop github page: https://github.com/cloudera/sqoop/downloads If you hit any snags send mail to sqoop-user@cloudera.org https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/sqoop-user/topics Thanks, Eli On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:23 PM, sangeetha s wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently I am working with hadoop+ hive from apache distribution. Since I > am in need to transfer data from myql to hive , I wish to use sqoop with > hadoop. While doing so I was instructed to use cloud era's distribution of > Hadoop.But I don't want to switch from Apache distribution to CDH. > > Is there any other way to download sqoop,I wish to stay with the existing > setup (Hadoop+Hive).? > > > Kindly tell me your suggestions. > > Thank you, > > > -- > Regards, > Sangita S. > From general-return-2534-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 07:15:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7056 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 07:15:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (::) by ::ffff:140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 07:15:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17706 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 07:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17367 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 07:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17359 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 07:15:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:15:13 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so185389gyf.35 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:14:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.145 with SMTP id f17mr10403827yhg.12.1292310891008; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.111.45 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:14:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6974FEB1-0E72-4FBF-8196-BF4B4E4D77BC@apache.org> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> <6974FEB1-0E72-4FBF-8196-BF4B4E4D77BC@apache.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:14:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c902399175a049759933c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023547c902399175a049759933c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > One of the technical issues is the fact that this precludes users from >> using >> PB (or thrift or avro) in their jobs if the version required conflicts >> with >> what Hadoop proper has on the classpath. >> > > This is currently true of all of our libraries and is addressed by > MAPREDUCE-1938. After that is committed, users who want to override to a > newer version just need to configure their job to do so. That's definitely nice. I hadn't seen that one. Using a new library, just because it is a serialization library other than > Avro, is not an acceptable reason to veto a patch. > That I'm not really qualified to say. I don't really know the rules on vetoes. But again, I'm more interested in the larger issue you raised (the subject of the thread). Part of direction for Hadoop, to me, is to get to a point where we're spending time working together. Again, I propose: - Codify (by vote) whether design plans are required or if an informal email indicating intent is sufficient, and under what circumstances. Provide examples to clarify circumstances. Solves the long term but not HADOOP-6685. - Focus the discussion on evaluation of proposals for remedying the process for conflict resolution. I know some exist, but they're drastic (removal of PMC members, for instance). - After consensus on above, focus the conversation (in another thread or on JIRA, whatever is most appropriate) on HADOOP-6685 so no one is blocked. - Put the community of users first in all areas of development and interaction. To the last point: I understand there's contention from past issues. I genuinely believe everyone has the users' interests at heart. I'm saying this as a user: this kind of contention is not in anyone's interest. We need true resolution to past issues, consensus on what the goals are and generally how to get there including how to resolve further disagreement, and only then can we jump back into the immediate issue where there is disagreement. I no longer care how corny I sound about this (and it's about to get corny). I implore all parties involved to take a long look at how we interact and to approach this with renewed respect for each other, the project, and the users. Decide to let previous cruft go and start anew. Do that by building consensus on getting out of a veto stalemate and coming up with a long term plan that makes sense to everyone. To the specific issue: Owen, would you be amenable to working to find a way to remove the PB dep in support of HADOOP-6685 and handling bootstrapping with either one of the existing deps or simple hard coded length, type, value serialization / deserialization similar to Writables? I understand your points about PB being solid, but Hadoop is already thick with deps (some of which do handle this, even if not in the preferred / most optimal format) and MR-1938 is still a ways off. Doug, is there any way to get past the objection to the SequenceFile update? It is a widely used format and is currently in Hadoop core. While I agree Hadoop should be a "kernel" as one artifact and libs as another, I think it would be less friction and cleaner to come up with a plan on how to get to that state independent of pending issues right now. It seems like maintaining backwards compat is critical to Owen et al as well and I'm sure we can come up with modifications to the patch to make it forward compat as well (if it's not already; I'm unclear on / don't remember this point). This, to me, looks like an achievable goal that doesn't compromise the functionality of HADOOP-6685 and leaves the door open to discussion of a stronger kernel / lib separation. Regards, respect, and no longer afraid of being corny on general@, -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0023547c902399175a049759933c-- From general-return-2535-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 19:09:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27903 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 19:09:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 19:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 82768 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 19:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82650 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 19:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82642 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 19:09:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.40] (HELO qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:09:22 +0000 Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id izLS1f00B1ap0As54792Yf; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:09:02 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id j78s1f00P2SbwD53i78vUj; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:09:00 +0000 Message-Id: <2C407569-EA1B-4CE9-B584-F81B2DE1D88E@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:08:51 -0800 References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> <4CF66812.4080602@apache.org> <4CFD39BC.1080005@apache.org> <4CFD7585.70803@apache.org> <5A920FAB-F76B-4EF7-8740-5698F99A1EC2@gbiv.com> <4CFE6C68.7000503@apache.org> <62FFAEB9-C6E7-4A82-BE1F-5DBB6C0A2CFF@apache.org> <6974FEB1-0E72-4FBF-8196-BF4B4E4D77BC@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 13, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > - Codify (by vote) whether design plans are required or if an > informal email > indicating intent is sufficient, and under what circumstances. Provide > examples to clarify circumstances. Solves the long term but not > HADOOP-6685. We had a presentation about my plans for this jira in June and both Tom and Doug attended and asked questions. It wasn't a lack of communication. At that time, they didn't like the proposal but didn't plan to block it. In general code changes shouldn't require a vote. The goal is to work together as a community to produce code, not make everything a lawyerly argument. > Owen, would you be amenable to working to find a way to remove the > PB dep in > support of HADOOP-6685 and handling bootstrapping with either one of > the > existing deps or simple hard coded length, type, value serialization / > deserialization similar to Writables? Of course it is possible, but it is a far worse engineering solution. ProtocolBuffers do exactly what I need, it is foolish to implement an hand-crafted replacement. My point is that a dependence on Avro was accepted without issue. No one had an issue when I added snakeyaml. All of the objections are fundamentally based in a dislike of serializations other than Yarn. -- Owen From general-return-2536-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 14 20:21:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56675 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 20:21:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 20:21:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 80743 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 20:21:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80691 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2010 20:21:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80678 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2010 20:21:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:21:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:21:17 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanagi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSbMj-0005fP-TJ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:20:53 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: hadoopberlin@isabel-drost.de Subject: Apache Mahout Hackathon - Berlin - Feb 2011 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:20:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: user@mahout.apache.org, general@lucene.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1421423.Zk8J7MEp3j"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012142120.21130.isabel@apache.org> --nextPart1421423.Zk8J7MEp3j Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, early 2011 - on February 19th/20th to be more precise - the first Apache Ma= hout=20 Hackathon is scheduled to take place at c-base in Berlin. The Hackathon wil= l=20 take one weekend. There will be plenty of time to hack on your favourite Ma= hout=20 issue, to get in touch with local Mahout committers, get your machine learn= ing=20 project off the ground. The venue features a bar that sells drinks (includi= ng=20 Club Mate) so no need to bring those. Please register at https://www.xing.com/events/apache-mahout-hackathon-6476= 03 if=20 you are planning to attend this event so we can plan for enough space for=20 everyone. If you have not registered for the event there is no guarantee yo= u=20 will be admitted. If you'd like to support the event: We'd love to provide pizza and drinks f= or=20 free. If you are interested in sponsoring, please contact me at=20 isabel@apache.org A special Thank You to c-base for providing the location free of charge. =46eel free to forward this information to anyone who might be interested, = tweet=20 the event, include information on your blog if you are attending. Check the= =20 above link to learn of potential changes. Looking forward to a fun and productive weekend, Isabel --nextPart1421423.Zk8J7MEp3j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk0H0X8ACgkQPJpCBAwIhbT3qQCfQ1ZzcXwIxMhh/jeQBgT+wibt edYAn2dvD37VVLoNF+QtfCwFJOpCCWkj =3/8D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1421423.Zk8J7MEp3j-- From general-return-2537-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 15 12:21:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29574 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2010 12:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2010 12:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 43723 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2010 12:21:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43261 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2010 12:21:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43253 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2010 12:21:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:21:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:21:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1607B7DD4 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:21:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T+Opg2sSOopE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:21:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9160FB7DD3 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:21:13 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1293020459.66333@GXdB3OxgiaxCNDGjcM7/UA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oBFCKvvV010028 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:57 GMT Message-ID: <4D08B2A9.5010304@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:57 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: How do I log from my map/reduce application? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oBFCKvvV010028 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 13/12/10 17:29, W.P. McNeill wrote: > I would like to use Hadoop's Log4j infrastructure to do logging from my > map/reduce application. I think I've got everything set up correctly, but I > am still unable to specify the logging level I want. > > By default Hadoop is set up to log at level INFO. The first line of its > log4j.properties file looks like this: > > hadoop.root.logger=INFO,console > > > I have an application whose reducer looks like this: > > package com.me; > > public class MyReducer<...> extends Reducer<...> { > private static Logger logger = > Logger.getLogger(MyReducer.class.getName()); > > ... > protected void reduce(...) { > logger.debug("My message"); > ... > } > } > > > I've added the following line to the Hadoop log4j.properties file: > > log4j.logger.com.me.MyReducer=DEBUG > > > I expect the Hadoop system to log at level INFO, but my application to log > at level DEBUG, so that I see "My message" in the logs for the reducer task. > However, my application does not produce any log4j output. If I change the > line in my reducer to read logger.info("My message") the message does get > logged, so somehow I'm failing to specify that log level for this class. > > I've also tried changing the log4j line for my app to > read log4j.logger.com.me.MyReducer=DEBUG,console and get the same result. > > I've been through the Hadoop and log4j documentation and I can't figure out > what I'm doing wrong. Any suggestions? I'd start with your logger logging @info level which log4j.properties file it's finding on the classpath. The code I use to find a resource looks like this: public URL findResource(String resource) { return getClass().getClassLoader().getResource(resource); } Once you know which log4j file is being used to drive your code, then you can start tweaking it... From general-return-2538-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 18:55:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29861 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 18:55:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 18:55:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 39360 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 18:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39247 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 18:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39239 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 18:55:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:55:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:55:19 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1503854vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.192.193 with SMTP id dr1mr2180449vcb.100.1292525698767; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.226] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm118816vch.36.2010.12.16.10.54.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:57 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Plans for the 0.22 Release Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:54:55 +1100 Message-Id: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Guys. how are we going with the 0.22 release. -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman We are not afraid of the truth, in fact we plan on taking the truth out = for a nice meal while we persuade it to adopt our views From general-return-2539-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 19:16:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47530 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 19:16:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 19:16:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 76305 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 19:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76264 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 19:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76256 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 19:16:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:16:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:16:17 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jugq1f0081swQuc51vFxod; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:15:57 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jvFn1f00A2SbwD53bvFrDL; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:15:55 +0000 Message-Id: <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:15:38 -0800 References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > how are we going with the 0.22 release. Progress has been blocked because HADOOP-6685 is still blocked. I feel that HADOOP-6685 is critical for Hadoop and don't see much point in working on a 0.22 release without it. In particular, HADOOP-6685 removes the need for third party serialization libraries that work around the current limitations of the MapReduce framework, but splinter the user community. If someone else wants to take over as release manager for 0.22 while we find a solution to make forward progress on HADOOP-6685, that would be fine. -- Owen From general-return-2540-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 20:27:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89716 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 20:27:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 20:27:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19446 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 20:27:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19362 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 20:27:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19354 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 20:27:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:27:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:26:52 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1557027vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.185.204 with SMTP id cp12mr2134948vcb.235.1292531191201; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.226] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r11sm195732vbx.11.2010.12.16.12.26.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:26:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:26:23 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 17, 2010, at 6:15 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >> how are we going with the 0.22 release. >=20 > Progress has been blocked because HADOOP-6685 is still blocked. I feel = that HADOOP-6685 is critical for Hadoop and don't see much point in = working on a 0.22 release without it. While it may be critical, I still don't understand why we couldn't = release without it, and carry on the discussion.=20 Putting so much emphasis and pressure on this issue is unwarranted.=20 Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to = hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring.=20 There are now 4 separate companies who have released their own 0.20 = version because of the delay on our releasing... Delaying this release another 2-3 months for a single patch seems a bit = extreme to me. =20 > In particular, HADOOP-6685 removes the need for third party = serialization libraries that work around the current limitations of the = MapReduce framework, but splinter the user community. >=20 > If someone else wants to take over as release manager for 0.22 while = we find a solution to make forward progress on HADOOP-6685, that would = be fine. >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-2541-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 22:01:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40624 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 22:01:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 22:01:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 77345 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 22:01:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77231 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 22:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77222 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 22:01:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:01:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:54 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so10068vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.181.133 with SMTP id by5mr2318375vcb.182.1292536833801; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.72.120.91] (nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bq5sm190621vcb.32.2010.12.16.14.00.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:29 -0800 References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > While it may be critical, I still don't understand why we couldn't > release without it, and carry on the discussion. > Putting so much emphasis and pressure on this issue is unwarranted. It took months to stabilize 0.21 and it took a lot of Tom's time. H-6685 is important to me and needs to be addressed to move the project forward. > Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to > hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't have the features that I think it needs. -- Owen From general-return-2542-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 22:38:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63531 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 22:38:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 22:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21644 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 22:37:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21599 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 22:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21591 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 22:37:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:37:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kengoou@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:37:53 +0000 Received: by pvb32 with SMTP id 32so8968pvb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:37:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=gRVyPVgWgtG2oDcKnxZebRgXcJbEYY96xf8ukeWrhIw=; b=Tcnqarwmjca00Lt/wKaG8Z/8+n50nE/Y1APxYTBzLClSGNY/Q44HAT0GxmLHczJjsx lKK+YgTI6OpIClGmsD2B71snHjk2C9Zc6PoHyNnFb3IALA7sq14VgaqZoTsGS7WtJN8o teSTSceWvQhXGBsYtUUs2NoYH36Mon/El2KsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=dhB9qSK3ejRzGmLXF05KoSMkedQ1iVUU83S1/X9FU5fOYe01WoYFBtsVp6cvMj8qL6 66vukAZN+zKrXxIcRskHpscglBzxZYzs9aYnywIAgKBbUbsh7y2x+vMOCCqJnK8TvAjU 7fnp9MsWo74FjaxWEuXIBg8XduffWSW9yW4cU= Received: by 10.142.166.20 with SMTP id o20mr96739wfe.382.1292539053006; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:37:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.43.15 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:37:12 -0800 (PST) From: kengoou Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:37:12 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: I may translate and publish the content of ML in blog in Japanese? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is kengoou that researches hadoop in Japan. It is thought that the content of this ML is translated and will be published in blog in Japanese by it , because Japanese hadoop information is a little. Are there any problems after related to the right for this matter? Thank you and best regards. http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kengoou/searchdiary?word=*[hadoop] kengoou@twitter From general-return-2543-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 16 23:11:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86086 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 23:11:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 23:11:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70424 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 23:11:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70358 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 23:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70349 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 23:11:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:11:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:11:00 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so29746vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.198.196 with SMTP id ep4mr10917vcb.110.1292541039063; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.226] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm218126vcr.15.2010.12.16.15.10.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:10:38 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:10:33 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to = hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >=20 > I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up = 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it = doesn't have the features that I think it needs. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 = with 6685? From general-return-2544-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 05:16:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25705 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 05:16:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 05:16:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 98890 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 05:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98576 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 05:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98563 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 05:16:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:16:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.46] (HELO mail-gw0-f46.google.com) (74.125.83.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:16:36 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so164674gwj.33 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.27.10 with SMTP id e10mr2097234ybj.225.1292562975126; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 72sm616720yhl.38.2010.12.16.21.16.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:16:10 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release Message-ID: <20101217051610.GC19072@tp> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:10AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 > On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > >> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to ha= doop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. > >=20 > > I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.2= 2. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't = have the features that I think it needs. > >=20 > > -- Owen > >=20 >=20 > That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. > Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 w= ith 6685? You meant to say "...to be the release manager for 22 without 6685?", didn'= t you? Cos --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk0K8hkACgkQenyFlstYjhK6xwEA4yMihNnyX24JAvx+h1clYYV2 oaf3FKrX6SCWtOOUTh4BAOHH0ulnfc5oJR3XuFzHZk5GztNvQPxAjZVKJaEkapb2 =5J7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB-- From general-return-2545-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 05:37:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41397 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 05:37:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 05:37:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 9497 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 05:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9295 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 05:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9285 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 05:37:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:37:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:37:30 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so113038vws.35 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.198.196 with SMTP id ep4mr103020vcb.110.1292564229756; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.226] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e18sm388005vbm.15.2010.12.16.21.37.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:37:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <20101217051610.GC19072@tp> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:37:03 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <20101217051610.GC19072@tp> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Dec 17, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >=20 >=20 > You meant to say "...to be the release manager for 22 without 6685?", = didn't you? Yes..=20 It's been a long day ;-( >=20 > Cos >=20 From general-return-2546-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 22:34:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91284 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 22:34:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 22:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17820 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 22:34:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17763 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 22:34:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17754 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 22:34:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:34:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:34:42 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so618157yxm.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:34:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ykieK1Rs8dhjByt1ga6fULTqqL9D2u3zjZXQUTJ8uQQ=; b=UefKviDVRYTqrG45fr6HfYmyFLUF+M38DPn5mkkFnNB/H+/JeeizP2MtjQQ4/lndsN AmtdZcncm5qaz9aHxYrxBt210+rIGcMYO3Xgn6In2ae7ORvjkdauCPmpIoRd+4FTrd1W hD+aPIwzWbUH9uIPcbz+EQBytmS9s1Xw/PZVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gubR1KiyjIsHgU4psqDmKSkgvvTuM2H0DJW/vRqM8pxV5aAuQPn3Etw1Z74mNYVXq1 d+Gupa98U5slWcZzNMY89Iyor31uSlzvNY7aLyeSNfRbTe9zcYxV0dTwS6PSdXiSXKeu Bmr74MSIQb+DscotnFTk7SYFvo9V4KgH1meU4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.108.177 with SMTP id q37mr2637914yhg.50.1292625261939; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:34:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:34:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bca2d90cdd30497a2c50e --90e6ba5bca2d90cdd30497a2c50e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Owen, Doug, Tom Could you please formulate and reply to this email separately what would be an *ACCEPTABLE *resolution of HADOOP-6685 for *YOU *to move *0.22* forward. Just trying to get something to work with to get us beyond the stagnation point. It could be "I want this patch in/out as is, final answer". Then we are stuck. But at least we will know there is no resolution to hope for anymore. And we have to find other ways based on that fact. It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro and ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. Or something else. Let's see if there is any common ground. If there is we can further talk about implementation and in the mean time declare the 0.22 freeze contingent on the completion of H-6685. Thanks, --Konstantin On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > >> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to > hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. > > > > I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.22. > I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't have > the features that I think it needs. > > > > -- Owen > > > > That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. > Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 > with 6685? > > --90e6ba5bca2d90cdd30497a2c50e-- From general-return-2547-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 22:52:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95055 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 22:52:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 22:52:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 29264 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 22:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29217 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 22:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29209 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 22:52:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:52:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 94762 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 22:52:05 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:52:05 +0000 Message-ID: <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:52:04 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/17/2010 02:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro and > ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. I'd be fine with removing Avro from the mapreduce user's classpath. It's currently an unused option for RPC, and is used server-side on the jobtracker. It could be removed from the user classpath today without loss of critical functionality. Doug From general-return-2548-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:20:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12716 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:20:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:20:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 53321 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53261 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53244 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:20:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:20:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:20:01 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1353886iwn.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lm1jxK7U94xDzJKHLPqTOY+pM8fIbj427H6Cbi+1YzU=; b=EWDFXV/iIBlK9crIard3i9FAZzbQdebauECaQrDiTmVEGVD7osEYQ5M8NnvpUL885H wABzdtrLtlV1o+1IMf609zVGZb9IEwnnepceGOo+OWQZk+FzGFIpqMYrAJ/n2y5yxtGf 1nD9lhPppRqtELvK7/Z+L5cJ7OqOi22chbnPI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wmdxl+oIh1LX7WDJYwL2celm6lGaSBJ6eihRZ+n2xb2dmNeemTugOn8bJa+QZj/4Am 0na5Kvm6qxX9jgog07Xq6nPlQp4wT70DAy5hsHvkYFxENxQKRkdxEns3fx8j+ywZuEZX UloZMDyP1cfrkd9qXiYpP5gAuV5MyHEvytqAs= Received: by 10.231.15.202 with SMTP id l10mr1387685iba.19.1292627980615; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering the "yeah, we know" category. Thanks, jg On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's still = quite > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and > test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of pat= ches > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. =A0Th= e > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease erro= rs > we may make. > -jg > > Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both these = projects >>>> currently have test failures. >>> >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to devel= opers >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0We d= idn't >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now = is the >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0This= is >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve test= s >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >> >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Currently, = that >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in >> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixe= d or >> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS a= s >> well) before I turn this on. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige > > From general-return-2549-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:24:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14591 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:24:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:24:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 58133 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57857 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:24:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57849 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:24:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:24:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:24:00 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so1273423qwh.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.211 with SMTP id o19mr1269358qcm.286.1292628219024; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:23:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I think all the known failing tests should block the release as well. Thanks, Eli On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the > developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all > known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS > and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering > the "yeah, we know" category. > > Thanks, > jg > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote= : >> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list >> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's still= quite >> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of pa= tches >> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. =A0T= he >> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease err= ors >> we may make. >> -jg >> >> Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> >>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both these= projects >>>>> currently have test failures. >>>> >>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to >>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to deve= lopers >>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0We = didn't >>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now= is the >>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0Thi= s is >>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve tes= ts >>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>> >>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Currently,= that >>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in >>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fix= ed or >>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS = as >>> well) before I turn this on. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >> >> > From general-return-2550-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:26:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14907 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:26:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:26:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 59754 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59566 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59558 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:26:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:26:25 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so871820iyb.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:26:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r/sIADtBxWtNXazDNIHo1V7cNCLc6cO6aLUgdRu8ieE=; b=wc8dPz542L5RUuyFomp+PzRthiQr9ycCevul6WeeDbRdz8RDuuyknejA+yt1ZMYwBj BFi6Kzzu7X/6I5IkHul4G5O19sQTU3ROpGjJ+Snq2UH6OaKKuZP8jmkgzUMDmhINnYOV psM+xQPPZBY5KApJPLkr1Xe3eHYQmA0N6IrRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZYNmAua021hCz2r9FyVzx9oOj2yayy0KPquCXCTxFzDBaYYSzJM2BBbTVVwK148INV Vf5dSI5bYMKFeN/c14lULw5/3ZKmfEPSczI21/BX6FVydJMPHqjGJRINoUiP/EUqtARp 2HPqfYEN2rf66pTbuXwRL0eOOQSawXchlMLpE= Received: by 10.231.182.85 with SMTP id cb21mr1377250ibb.44.1292628364792; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:26:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:25:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:25:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doh. Forgot to include a shout-out to Nigel for adding the failing-tests-list to test-patch. Thanks! On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > +1 > > I think all the known failing tests should block the release as well. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >> the "yeah, we know" category. >> >> Thanks, >> jg >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrot= e: >>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could lis= t >>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's stil= l quite >>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of p= atches >>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. =A0= The >>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease er= rors >>> we may make. >>> -jg >>> >>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> >>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both thes= e projects >>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>> >>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason t= o >>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to dev= elopers >>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0We= didn't >>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests no= w is the >>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0Th= is is >>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve te= sts >>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>> >>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Currently= , that >>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are i= n >>>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fi= xed or >>>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS= as >>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>> >>> >> > From general-return-2551-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:46:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19704 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:46:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:46:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 77498 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:46:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77361 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77353 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:46:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:46:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:46:51 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1273792wwd.29 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.63.15 with SMTP id z15mr1745142wec.74.1292629590352; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:46:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:46:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:46:10 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NnlyVHrpatNusZAgFe64D2XBGI8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I do believe that it makes sense to wait a bit longer before doing this. If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. Number of failing tests has been reduced from 16 down to 4. Of those for 1 is a real bug (reviled by HDFS-903) and other three (all of the same nature) are needed to be investigated more. I'm for fixing the trunk first. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:19, Jakob Homan wrote: > So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the > developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all > known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS > and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering > the "yeah, we know" category. > > Thanks, > jg > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote= : >> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list >> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's still= quite >> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of pa= tches >> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. =A0T= he >> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease err= ors >> we may make. >> -jg >> >> Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> >>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both these= projects >>>>> currently have test failures. >>>> >>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to >>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to deve= lopers >>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0We = didn't >>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now= is the >>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0Thi= s is >>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve tes= ts >>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>> >>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Currently,= that >>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in >>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fix= ed or >>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS = as >>> well) before I turn this on. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >> >> > From general-return-2552-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:48:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19899 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:48:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:48:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 78910 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:48:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78841 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78833 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:48:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:48:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:48:30 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1274659wwd.29 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:48:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AQENCSYq86SH550hVPpOhuNGPQJl15/5ks0pkzbRbxI=; b=aUl4NGQhfiwlWTYjzaEJDA+vLpXc/LSwLVxmY1qqWcg4EhToYmO0F3uRAvkf2n/pmA GIrNULQafPbS1rdg+FdXy1tsel+Qp4vi+dnEsasYaFtX2ZYVMwJAbJWeD5m1VxBj7UFa y9ilpU7xGT4t/9T/WqYqXRcHr65GUaImbNPl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QhT52kRYHZafGMeftsC+R9GolgcL8pugQw3bZmf+jFjuqRT/4HuWPDseeNl0jcjVMD nQutUVqiTbgt1e8NUHXJzKN7Ec9zQIz5gmtqoSrXNGoevLF7odGHqBhtTqb43PJ1T+p9 rxEl/zQQSfsS12C7c2P9dD2gd5XrkxNQXHJWk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.144 with SMTP id h16mr1745760wem.64.1292629688674; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.242.205 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:48:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:48:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c1e766b6ab60497a3cd88 --0016e64c1e766b6ab60497a3cd88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1, thanks for doing this. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the > developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all > known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS > and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering > the "yeah, we know" category. > > Thanks, > jg > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be > > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list > > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's still > quite > > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and > > test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of > patches > > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. The > > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease > errors > > we may make. > > -jg > > > > Nigel Daley wrote: > >> > >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> > >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on > >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these > projects > >>>> currently have test failures. > >>> > >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to > >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to > developers > >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We > didn't > >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known > >>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is > the > >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This > is > >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve > tests > >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > >> > >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. Currently, > that > >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in > >> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixed > or > >> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS as > >> well) before I turn this on. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > > > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0016e64c1e766b6ab60497a3cd88-- From general-return-2553-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 17 23:56:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22058 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 23:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 23:56:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 84556 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:56:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84505 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 23:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84497 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 23:56:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:56:16 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1381383iwn.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:55:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x+nNr6xqtG9loIpGt5nqYzIRoG2bJieHoyPM9QXMj4U=; b=SDyaVUWGzukdGVxK3lLXAwC2mMUhJvqiKZ8hkMZxiBRFcVBNP+757e7n6E/tHvC+Re Gq/5zQ7gQe0PCCpCXy7QeO6myJY2pQN5k5xI0aK7dh1TGWmHpJOpj6lgQOGanSFZD67/ 8pmnh2OzMEtO3KYUQI6wcIseu/f28l0fkDDVE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YplcG9x4xpxsjWI3FQtG7bMUS9RvMAtfXACAOWJKchEw2iKzBKroYVe51VQQYA4HY7 PSQb5mAWU/4jLwkXlEmOBYctG84Eqq9dL0U8w3TkmnYoQC1f1zQU0AjUoV+dUblvrsGV 4opWPaQBiKCZQ4KtoNB+ZwitxPAzlVvsdW2zo= Received: by 10.42.176.129 with SMTP id be1mr1491731icb.48.1292630156090; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:55:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:55:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:55:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that the developer doesn't have to. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > +1, thanks for doing this. > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >> the "yeah, we know" category. >> >> Thanks, >> jg >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrot= e: >> > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >> > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could li= st >> > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's sti= ll >> quite >> > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >> > test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of >> patches >> > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. = =A0The >> > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >> errors >> > we may make. >> > -jg >> > >> > Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> >> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >> >> >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it o= n >> >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both the= se >> projects >> >>>> currently have test failures. >> >>> >> >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason = to >> >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >> developers >> >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0W= e >> didn't >> >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >> >>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests n= ow is >> the >> >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0T= his >> is >> >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >> tests >> >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >> >> >> >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Currentl= y, >> that >> >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are = in >> >> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests f= ixed >> or >> >> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDF= S as >> >> well) before I turn this on. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nige >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > From general-return-2554-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 00:17:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34963 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 00:17:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 00:17:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 96499 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 00:17:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96444 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 00:17:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96436 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 00:17:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:17:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:17:45 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1285232wye.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:17:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr1747962wel.104.1292631443841; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:17:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:17:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:17:03 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6_KCzhU1-4D5v-tB8j253kms5mM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 > isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running > (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that > the developer doesn't have to. > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrot= e: >> +1, thanks for doing this. >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> jg >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wro= te: >>> > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to b= e >>> > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could l= ist >>> > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's st= ill >>> quite >>> > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>> > test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of >>> patches >>> > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. = =A0The >>> > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >>> errors >>> > we may make. >>> > -jg >>> > >>> > Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it = on >>> >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both th= ese >>> projects >>> >>>> currently have test failures. >>> >>> >>> >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason= to >>> >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>> developers >>> >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0= We >>> didn't >>> >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>> >>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests = now is >>> the >>> >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0= This >>> is >>> >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >>> tests >>> >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>> >> >>> >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Current= ly, >>> that >>> >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are= in >>> >> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests = fixed >>> or >>> >> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HD= FS as >>> >> well) before I turn this on. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Nige >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >> > From general-return-2555-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 03:02:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91534 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 03:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 03:02:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 82568 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:02:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82513 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82504 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 03:02:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:02:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:01:46 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so1358895wwd.29 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:01:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.186.76 with SMTP id v54mr4592185wem.74.1292641285456; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:01:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:01:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:01:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _NgXICKG3sWtdhV9XvoAuS8jtDg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HDFS is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be > -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment > why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier > IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. > > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 >> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that >> the developer doesn't have to. >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wro= te: >>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> >>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> jg >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wr= ote: >>>> > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to = be >>>> > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could = list >>>> > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's s= till >>>> quite >>>> > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>>> > test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot o= f >>>> patches >>>> > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. = =A0The >>>> > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >>>> errors >>>> > we may make. >>>> > -jg >>>> > >>>> > Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it= on >>>> >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both t= hese >>>> projects >>>> >>>> currently have test failures. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reaso= n to >>>> >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>>> developers >>>> >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. = =A0We >>>> didn't >>>> >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were know= n >>>> >>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests= now is >>>> the >>>> >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). = =A0This >>>> is >>>> >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >>>> tests >>>> >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>> >> >>>> >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Curren= tly, >>>> that >>>> >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that ar= e in >>>> >> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests= fixed >>>> or >>>> >> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to H= DFS as >>>> >> well) before I turn this on. >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Nige >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>> >> > From general-return-2556-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 03:17:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1821 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 03:17:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 03:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 91284 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:17:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91132 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91124 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 03:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:17:23 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1505244iwn.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:17:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.16.131 with SMTP id o3mr1539073iba.5.1292642223113; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:17:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.102 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:16:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:16:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 > isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running > (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that > the developer doesn't have to. > I agree with Jakob. I've had to run and re-run the test-patch and unit tests probably 30 times over the last two weeks, and it takes a lot of effort, since my own infrastructure for doing this is a bit messy. I'd much rather just reply to the Hudson comments saying "these are known issues" than have to run the tests, check the results, copy and paste them and *then* say "these are known issues" anyway! > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrot= e: >> +1, thanks for doing this. >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> jg >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wro= te: >>> > True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to b= e >>> > verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could l= ist >>> > which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's st= ill >>> quite >>> > a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>> > test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of >>> patches >>> > up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. = =A0The >>> > more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >>> errors >>> > we may make. >>> > -jg >>> > >>> > Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it = on >>> >>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both th= ese >>> projects >>> >>>> currently have test failures. >>> >>> >>> >>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason= to >>> >>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>> developers >>> >>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. =A0= We >>> didn't >>> >>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>> >>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests = now is >>> the >>> >>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). =A0= This >>> is >>> >>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >>> tests >>> >>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>> >> >>> >> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Current= ly, >>> that >>> >> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are= in >>> >> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests = fixed >>> or >>> >> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HD= FS as >>> >> well) before I turn this on. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Nige >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >> > --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-2557-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 03:22:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2322 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 03:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 03:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 94273 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:22:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94070 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94062 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 03:22:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:22:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:22:51 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.101.150.89] ([166.205.136.43]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDL00LK3TDFQF80@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:22:30 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-17_08:2010-12-17,2010-12-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012170219 References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> In-reply-to: Message-id: <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:22:22 -0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll enable hdfs patch testing. Cheers, Nige Sent from my iPhone4 On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HDFS is > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment >> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier >> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >> >> -- >> Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 >>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that >>> the developer doesn't have to. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> jg >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list >>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's still >>>>> quite >>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of >>>>> patches >>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. The >>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >>>>> errors >>>>>> we may make. >>>>>> -jg >>>>>> >>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these >>>>> projects >>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to >>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>>>> developers >>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We >>>>> didn't >>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is >>>>> the >>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This >>>>> is >>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >>>>> tests >>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. Currently, >>>>> that >>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in >>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixed >>>>> or >>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS as >>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Nige >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>> >>> >> From general-return-2558-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 03:42:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6662 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 03:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 03:42:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 10206 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:42:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9911 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 03:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9903 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 03:42:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:42:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:42:21 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1518980iwn.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:42:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mq0cf3TYVtYEu1+xF8Gruo/B9rXmNV/J5q1U8nEyBcI=; b=bqrmLhnjYyCYtVpqbU31knoQoJgrlvQFudHkvcqbkYLawyXs7z0AoWbRNgwKk6B3x1 PKS1c9YZP0YCSZ9l3mf9h8kAzCpn0Tgi3NTOgogNelxbucHjHDJtJdT9OQIqZ8iqfZ/C QfvYoN2mPNlN+CW2ZC9M8JmmOuCjwlK0foKCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZZU7i9QRUSWDpQkYTOiuLCaW7LYkgKQ7RCyM+PnWBq0VoFUJe1eoDMKDT3mC++vmPS 9SjS3hSs4lLK68Bu9/xd1DAXHbClF0X3xQGOD/MnL2HHP3LpUyt3OD+9WyY7nsszcevB +KHJLo/Uwfbb/oEs3hreTC+mxuaS7Cr3sbxmQ= Received: by 10.231.16.68 with SMTP id n4mr1549175iba.94.1292643720997; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:42:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:41:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:41:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to whip one up tonight. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll enable= hdfs patch testing. > > Cheers, > Nige > > Sent from my iPhone4 > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HDFS= is >> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >> -- >> =A0 Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote= : >>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment >>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier >>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>> >>> -- >>> =A0 Take care, >>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 >>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that >>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur w= rote: >>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrot= e: >>>>> >>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>>>>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from enteri= ng >>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> jg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan = wrote: >>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to= be >>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could= list >>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's = still >>>>>> quite >>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests an= d >>>>>>> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot = of >>>>>> patches >>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches.= =A0The >>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decreas= e >>>>>> errors >>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn i= t on >>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both = these >>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reas= on to >>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. = =A0We >>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were kno= wn >>>>>>>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing test= s now is >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). = =A0This >>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involv= e >>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Curre= ntly, >>>>>> that >>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that a= re in >>>>>>>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these test= s fixed >>>>>> or >>>>>>>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to = HDFS as >>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>> >>>> >>> > From general-return-2559-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 18 04:32:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21850 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 04:32:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 04:32:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 34656 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 04:32:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34500 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2010 04:32:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34492 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2010 04:32:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:32:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:32:15 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1395222wye.35 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.46.19 with SMTP id q19mr1707835web.0.1292646713422; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:31:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:31:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:31:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JO3p-aEIzkBcdA3g4w6PwqxPyb4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, unless it is done earlier. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: > Ok. =A0I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to > whip one up tonight. > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll enabl= e hdfs patch testing. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> Sent from my iPhone4 >> >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HDF= S is >>> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>> -- >>> =A0 Take care, >>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrot= e: >>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment >>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier >>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> =A0 Take care, >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 >>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so tha= t >>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur = wrote: >>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wro= te: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDF= S >>>>>>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from enter= ing >>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> jg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan = wrote: >>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need t= o be >>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson coul= d list >>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that's= still >>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests a= nd >>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot= of >>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches= . =A0The >>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrea= se >>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn = it on >>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like both= these >>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a rea= son to >>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable t= o >>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. = =A0We >>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were kn= own >>>>>>>>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing tes= ts now is >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). = =A0This >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests invol= ve >>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Curr= ently, >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that = are in >>>>>>>>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these tes= ts fixed >>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to= HDFS as >>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> > From general-return-2560-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 20 07:28:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23958 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 07:28:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 07:28:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 28257 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 07:28:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27919 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 07:28:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27910 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 07:28:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:27:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 23915 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 07:27:36 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f43.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:27:36 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so3656655bwz.2 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:27:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.122.17 with SMTP id j17mr677635bkr.4.1292830053842; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.76.14 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:27:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:27:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04bf1d3d990497d27411 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6de04bf1d3d990497d27411 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 12/17/2010 02:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro and >> ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. >> > > I'd be fine with removing Avro from the mapreduce user's classpath. It's > currently an unused option for RPC, and is used server-side on the > jobtracker. It could be removed from the user classpath today without loss > of critical functionality. That would be non-trivial and no one has requested that. You haven't answered Konstantin's question. What do you consider the technical reasons for rejecting the patch as is? -- Owen --0016e6de04bf1d3d990497d27411-- From general-return-2561-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 20 19:39:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73891 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 19:39:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 19:39:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 90824 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 19:39:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90768 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 19:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90760 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 19:39:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:39:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:39:45 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so1736189ywo.35 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:39:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5Q2U1tLrrwvqUC7+RZpRl1cY0F0DidZUeHuRXth+Ors=; b=HYfcYpA/c9IrTsm61kGFbFOEqPOk+A36wG3KlzITbl2SXbymnpepvpF4oqXcGdLoRj tVP8AZlZqtQwkhICH2yT6yeXF4t179oFZw53LF12UlXJ+HgrFbwNlpo8RTfK6qJLViy1 4anRvJv0dRvTHLqp6xJO1BpjVandNSIdNWofg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GJxha1ig7JdMUy/ig7skAhJmopv+JeAmy4WrKUsEnRx1tho5lsv+A0wDGOBWFJ6Ohj U0nAa3arhGCIc9LSzcoASAFULyT4J8fv8ErVPa4mGPRxZucR495neqmsdI8IHXlPck+W gGwZV63b8PnS8sBnbtNoEtYsxG2hlhYpWbXzs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.95.144 with SMTP id p16mr8444846yhf.11.1292873964975; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:39:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:39:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354435d106bf7200497dcad80 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --002354435d106bf7200497dcad80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My question is What would be an *ACCEPTABLE *resolution of HADOOP-6685 for *YOU *to move *0.22* forward? Asking Owen as the author of the patch, Doug and Tom as they vetoed it. If I am asking the wrong question please let me know. I am not proposing a particular solution, just trying to understand 1. if there is any 2. What is it if there is. If, say removing dependency for Avro and updating the patch symmetrically removing PB dependency is a solution, if there is a solution to SequenceFile and byte array issues, then lets do it. If not then lets face it. Thanks, --Konstantin On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > On 12/17/2010 02:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > >> It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro and > >> ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. > >> > > > > I'd be fine with removing Avro from the mapreduce user's classpath. It's > > currently an unused option for RPC, and is used server-side on the > > jobtracker. It could be removed from the user classpath today without > loss > > of critical functionality. > > > That would be non-trivial and no one has requested that. You haven't > answered Konstantin's question. > > What do you consider the technical reasons for rejecting the patch as is? > > -- Owen > --002354435d106bf7200497dcad80-- From general-return-2562-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 20 20:13:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90037 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 20:13:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 20:13:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32343 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32292 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32284 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 20:13:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:13:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:12:55 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so3462533wye.35 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:12:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=S4T+PcX1wz8RYTN7rKTZFRvVBA8hUasbD1WBt0B6SJE=; b=YTkSXlW+mXDIuppAtW5ndymAKml474aB9KXSQ4st+h5eUtrxyHSFr+lH+fRuPknvsC wweIEbExZaD4Ns3KiDW/KQbotA1+sxnP/C8+X4KpZPJ73c9Vk4XbuKtr/1tyO5RSfO5s JLZf5mGjv1hgzNUD2hSKvxX08MO7vInZQ2XJw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lLMXRVBV+q8fs2uM4HzLBSg3Qvj4bg2chf8HOk58pGk13CGxfAyY8ZnZeGLMlqQP1o 5JiycRdyKImfMX2lqTFGDYJJx0DVOjex3yE0NMeqj/QKC6Yo4J/gYhdweb9iayYQj5+D 8ZdYn0HU2kn0eyR+uFxTzd5nmexDBsDxmRBes= Received: by 10.216.160.129 with SMTP id u1mr7778133wek.88.1292875954039; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:12:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.19.193 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:12:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:12:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Sending this again as my original post didn't make it to the list for some reason. Can't see it in the moderation queue either.] I don't personally see HADOOP-6685 as a blocker for a 0.22 release, since there is a lot of value in there already that has not been released yet, such as security. However, to get HADOOP-6685 resolved, from my point of view the main thing to sort out are the modularity concerns that I and others have raised, so that serializations are pluggable and don't add potentially incompatible libraries onto the user's classpath. Thanks, Tom On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > My question is > =A0 =A0What would be an *ACCEPTABLE *resolution of HADOOP-6685 for *YOU *= to > move *0.22* forward? > Asking Owen as the author of the patch, Doug and Tom as they vetoed it. > > If I am asking the wrong question please let me know. > I am not proposing a particular solution, just trying to understand > 1. if there is any > 2. What is it if there is. > > If, say removing dependency for Avro and updating the patch symmetrically > removing PB dependency is a solution, if there is a solution to SequenceF= ile > and byte array issues, then lets do it. > If not then lets face it. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote= : >> >> > On 12/17/2010 02:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> > >> >> It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro an= d >> >> ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. >> >> >> > >> > I'd be fine with removing Avro from the mapreduce user's classpath. It= 's >> > currently an unused option for RPC, and is used server-side on the >> > jobtracker. =A0It could be removed from the user classpath today witho= ut >> loss >> > of critical functionality. >> >> >> That would be non-trivial and no one has requested that. You haven't >> answered Konstantin's question. >> >> What do you consider the technical reasons for rejecting the patch as is= ? >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-2563-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 20 20:43:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97611 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 20:43:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 20:43:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 70283 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70201 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:43:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70193 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 20:43:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:43:46 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so3008705iyb.35 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6yd4d8yjDAgk9q8YuTAo61yBFjjJRrSpAZ83W9hquNA=; b=Mx5Ew0PFoSshdaYbeKdSO10eFX1vyi4SmLwEeekQEgQg8QyJFeqEppJe8p7WNAPiFP zkQhdhCpj8BYhWvqdQrYxSOVjOEyuHMPGZwyNSYyADHbt29gVwCnRrZ58bCVWHQ9MIsL 3IsAhHQRtNixBLry+Z44rlKqJgUpOVyFK/i/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lZhfvJsxhTbFd07dVDCk1sNiWRjXo6oc9VG64j2Y1GzSTUdIM8PLRT4TkB3C6qqDge wM7ZXSrmF7Z7SLs6Jxfcy/ewztqOiVNs5FkpyCftflsn8d12mT11swbbD+tYOPLBtVsI LQL4hVZQqKZOAKcJ1Q2411THKs8O5LZT2/DKo= Received: by 10.231.30.73 with SMTP id t9mr4544027ibc.144.1292877805801; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can haz snooty robot butler? On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, > unless it is done earlier. > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: >> Ok. =A0I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to >> whip one up tonight. >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll enab= le hdfs patch testing. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HD= FS is >>>> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>> -- >>>> =A0 Take care, >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wro= te: >>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment >>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier >>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> =A0 Take care, >>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. =A0The -1 >>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so th= at >>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur = wrote: >>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wr= ote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HD= FS >>>>>>>> and mapred? =A0I think it'll help prevent any more tests from ente= ring >>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need = to be >>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson cou= ld list >>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). =A0But that'= s still >>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests = and >>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. =A0Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lo= t of >>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patche= s. =A0The >>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decre= ase >>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn= it on >>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Looks like bot= h these >>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a re= ason to >>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable = to >>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves.= =A0We >>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were k= nown >>>>>>>>>>> failures. =A0I think one of the reasons we have more failing te= sts now is >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know).= =A0This >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests invo= lve >>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. =A0Cur= rently, >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that= are in >>>>>>>>>> patch available state. =A0Shouldn't we focus on getting these te= sts fixed >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>> removed/? =A0Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies t= o HDFS as >>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > From general-return-2564-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 21 19:25:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42092 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 19:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 19:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 66242 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 19:25:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66177 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 19:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66169 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 19:25:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:25:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:25:38 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDS00C8YLXL13B0@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:24:58 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-21_07:2010-12-21,2010-12-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012210096 Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:24:57 -0800 Message-id: <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track, so I'll volunteer to do it. Its been a while since I was the release manager so I'll need help. Looks like in Jira we currently have: 26 MR blockers: http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg 17 HDFS blockers: http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl 6 HADOOP blockers: http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2 Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of these are truly blockers. I'll start cleaning up the list and ping folks after the holidays. Cheers, Nige On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >> >> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't have the features that I think it needs. >> >> -- Owen >> > > That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. > Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 with 6685? > From general-return-2565-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 21 21:08:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2565 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 21:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 21:08:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 20889 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:08:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20832 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20824 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 21:08:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:08:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:08:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 21:08:24 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f43.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:08:24 +0000 Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so6041360bwz.2 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:08:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.20 with SMTP id f20mr5169954bkj.139.1292965701623; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.76.14 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:08:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <4D0BE994.4020207@apache.org> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:08:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04215a1ea20497f20936 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6de04215a1ea20497f20936 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Tom White wrote: > However, to get HADOOP-6685 resolved, > from my point of view the main thing to sort out are the modularity > concerns that I and others have raised, so that serializations are > pluggable and don't add potentially incompatible libraries onto the > user's classpath. > The serializers are already completely pluggable. If you want to propose a plan for reducing the number of jars on the user's task classpath that might be interesting. Clearly, it would be a separate jira, since it has nothing to do with the serialization interface. -- Owen --0016e6de04215a1ea20497f20936-- From general-return-2566-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 21 21:18:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7150 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 21:18:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 21:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 33548 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33479 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33471 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 21:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:18:47 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1843009vws.35 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:18:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.171.9 with SMTP id f9mr1542653vcz.275.1292966305976; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.0.49] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm1171678vch.35.2010.12.21.13.18.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:18:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:18:19 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2262BB4D-4D8B-4122-A498-493306860AAF@Holsman.NET> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Thanks Nige. On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track, so = I'll volunteer to do it. Its been a while since I was the release = manager so I'll need help. >=20 > Looks like in Jira we currently have: > 26 MR blockers: http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg > 17 HDFS blockers: http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl > 6 HADOOP blockers: http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2 > Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of = these are truly blockers. I'll start cleaning up the list and ping = folks after the holidays. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>=20 >>>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to = hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >>>=20 >>> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up = 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it = doesn't have the features that I think it needs. >>>=20 >>> -- Owen >>>=20 >>=20 >> That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. >> Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for = 22 with 6685? >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2567-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 21 21:34:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13046 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 21:34:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 21:34:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 68200 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:34:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68091 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 21:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68083 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 21:34:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:34:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:34:24 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDS00ECLRW2VF70@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:33:39 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012210124 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-21_07:2010-12-21,2010-12-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:33:37 -0800 Message-id: <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on the ~30 Patch Available HDFS issues. Nige On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can > haz snooty robot butler? > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >> unless it is done earlier. >> -- >> Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: >>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to >>> whip one up tonight. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll enable hdfs patch testing. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>> >>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>> >>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on HDFS is >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>> -- >>>>> Take care, >>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a comment >>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but messier >>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Take care, >>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 >>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so that >>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are all >>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for HDFS >>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from entering >>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be >>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list >>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's still >>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and >>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of >>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. The >>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease >>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these >>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to >>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to >>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We >>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known >>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve >>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. Currently, >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in >>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixed >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> From general-return-2568-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 21 23:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57149 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 23:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 23:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82448 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 23:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82402 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2010 23:00:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82394 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2010 23:00:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:00:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:00:00 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4689179wwd.29 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.133 with SMTP id p5mr6646683wel.89.1292972379839; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:59:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:59:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:59:19 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ux8gwzaXvL4IUem1UBp1v9m1cxY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:24, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track, so I'= ll volunteer to do it. =A0Its been a while since I was the release manager = so I'll need help. > > Looks like in Jira we currently have: > =A026 MR blockers: http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg > =A017 HDFS blockers: http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl > =A06 HADOOP blockers: http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2 > Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of th= ese are truly blockers. =A0I'll start cleaning up the list and ping folks a= fter the holidays. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >>>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to ha= doop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >>> >>> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.2= 2. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't = have the features that I think it needs. >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >> >> That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. >> Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 = with 6685? >> > > From general-return-2569-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 00:33:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10944 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 00:33:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 00:33:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 80785 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 00:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80709 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 00:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80701 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 00:33:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:33:26 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4750835wwd.29 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7c9t+RzFDW6Lpz2wadTMQ7SjqG4tAFtvvTVopKDs18c=; b=RlPZkp6SNT9dYXYCSM0zioL4Xc9+yo1k/M/Ncf4cSeLWAV9JqyCgds7tFXhGwdK6QC 5fh6Bq9AKVYM02lmt3n8yrlFK4wvpxZVSpyEwR8Pcdqn6WleiSAxASRGiuGQZ5XBNJY3 e4aA9KOWomOAMl5PaE7+NArjq+SF6GuJ4P6nA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eG0lb4tVoUI3dKz2c+rThs524vPfoEqmKdMkLe+Ge6OkH2x5bWccYKua9E2ss+KO9X 7BwaSuk3SqVzobncrth5APth427zUcRU0iv0UXa1xj2MbywQCnvt+pL/0N5wtd3YF6iQ MH+xQ0vqj/as+Z9zlsyFOi2X12TVQcUVujsJs= Received: by 10.216.28.19 with SMTP id f19mr6719324wea.88.1292977985217; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:33:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.19.193 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:17:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:17:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Owen, Doug, Tom > > Could you please formulate and reply to this email separately > =A0 =A0 what would be an *ACCEPTABLE *resolution of > =A0 =A0 HADOOP-6685 for *YOU *to move *0.22* forward. > Just trying to get something to work with to get us beyond the stagnation > point. > > It could be "I want this patch in/out as is, final answer". Then we are > stuck. > But at least we will know there is no resolution to hope for anymore. > And we have to find other ways based on that fact. > > It could be a zero-option plan - remove dependencies both for Avro and > ProtocolBuffers out into libraries, similar to schedulers. > Or something else. > Let's see if there is any common ground. If there is > we can further talk about implementation and in the mean time declare > the 0.22 freeze contingent on the completion of H-6685. I don't personally see HADOOP-6685 as a blocker for a 0.22 release, since there is a lot of value in there already that has not been released yet, such as security. However, to get HADOOP-6685 resolved, from my point of view the main thing to sort out are the modularity concerns that I and others have raised, so that serializations are pluggable and don't add potentially incompatible libraries onto the user's classpath. Thanks, Tom > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> >> On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> >> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to >> hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >> > >> > I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.= 22. >> I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't = have >> the features that I think it needs. >> > >> > -- Owen >> > >> >> That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. >> Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 >> with 6685? >> >> > From general-return-2570-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 07:57:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90740 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 07:57:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 07:57:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 52636 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 07:57:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51830 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 07:56:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51773 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 07:56:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:56:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:56:53 +0000 Received: from 46-127-147-3.dclient.hispeed.ch ([46.127.147.3] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVJYl-0005is-Ix; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:56:31 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, infrastructure-dev@apache.org, Jukka Zitting , dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Test instance of Gerrit? Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:56:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012220856.27550.thomas@koch.ro> Hi, the topic of official GIT repos for apache projects has been raised again a few weeks ago on infrastructure-dev@a.o.[1] However I can't see who is doing what in which direction over there, if anything is moving at all. [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.infrastructure.devel/1151 I proposed a draft for a requirements document for the GIT setup and suggested to give Gerrit a try. There hasn't been a reply however since more than two weeks. Gerrit is a repository manager developed for the android project and also used by the repository foundation. It includes patch review, workflow and CLA-tracking. [2] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ Now my question is, whether there's some interest from developers to give Gerrit a try? In this case, I'd setup a private toy instance and import your project. I don't want to shoot anybody from infrastructure-dev@a.o in the back. I just think it would help to have some hands-on experience so that people can make better judgements. Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-2571-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 15:04:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25338 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 15:04:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 15:04:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 45336 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 15:04:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45165 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 15:04:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45157 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 15:04:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:04:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bjoern@schiessle.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [78.46.69.5] (HELO zucker.schokokeks.org) (78.46.69.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:04:43 +0000 Received: from laptop (infedyn152.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [::ffff:129.69.220.152]) (AUTH: LOGIN schiesbn@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by zucker.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:04:20 +0100 id 000000000001C006.000000004D121375.00004D28 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:03:11 +0100 From: Bjoern Schiessle To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: namenode doesn't start after reboot Message-ID: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, After a Kernel update and a reboot the namenode doesn't start. I run the Cloudera cdh3 Hadoop distribution. I have already searched for a solution. It looks like I'm not the only one with such a problem. Sadly I could only find descriptions of similar problems, but no solutions... This is the error message from the namenode log file: 2010-12-22 16:13:04,830 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNod= e: STARTUP_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D pcube/129.69.216.24 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2+737 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D -r 98c55c28258aa6f42250569bd7fa431ac657bdbd; comp= iled by 'root' on Mon Oct 11 17:21:30 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-12-22 16:13:05,001 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Init= ializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull 2010-12-22 16:13:05,007 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics= .NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.ap= ache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNames= ystem: fsOwner=3Dhdfs 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNames= ystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNames= ystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dfalse 2010-12-22 16:13:05,040 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNames= ystem: isAccessTokenEnabled=3Dfalse accessKeyUpdateInterval=3D0 min(s), acc= essTokenLifetime=3D0 min(s) 2010-12-22 16:13:05,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics= .FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context object= :org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2010-12-22 16:13:05,336 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNames= ystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2010-12-22 16:13:05,361 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: = Number of files =3D 72 2010-12-22 16:13:05,374 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: = Number of files under construction =3D 3 2010-12-22 16:13:05,375 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: = Image file of size 8822 loaded in 0 seconds. 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNo= de: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addChild(FSDirectory= .java:1088) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addChild(FSDirectory= .java:1100) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addNode(FSDirectory.= java:1003) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.unprotectedAddFile(F= SDirectory.java:206) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.= java:637) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java= :1034) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java= :845) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FS= Image.java:379) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirect= ory.java:99) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesy= stem.java:343) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem= .java:317) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.jav= a:214) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:39= 4) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode= .java:1148) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1157) 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNod= e: SHUTDOWN_MSG:=20 /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at pcube/129.69.216.24 ************************************************************/ Any idea what could be wrong and how I can get my namenode up running again? Thanks a lot! Bj=F6rn From general-return-2572-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 17:44:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9757 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 17:44:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 17:44:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 52530 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 17:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52203 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 17:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52077 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 17:44:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:44:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Ken_Walker@ca.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.144 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.144] (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:44:15 +0000 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.56]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBMHQE28017721 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:26:26 -0500 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4B4728051 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:43:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oBMHhnXB373898 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:43:49 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oBMHhnAu010023 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:43:49 -0500 Received: from d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.105]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id oBMHhnOc009959 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:43:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release X-KeepSent: 7374242E:2BE4BD82-85257801:00613180; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP1 January 05, 2010 Message-ID: From: Ken Walker Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:43:47 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 8.0.2FP5|April 13, 2010) at 12/22/2010 12:43:48 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/related; Boundary="0__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710" X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER --0__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="1__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710" --1__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Not sure what state this issue is in, would be nice for 0.22 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 I don't see it in the lists below. It's a bit of a blocker running on non-Sun (Oracle) JREs. = = = = = Ken (K.N.) 2670 Queensview = Walker Drive = = J9 Java Ottawa, Ontario K2B = Class 8K1 = Libraries = Lead = = Java Canada = Technology = Centre = = IBM = Software = Group = = Phone: +1-613-356-5021 = = e-mail: ken_walker@ca.ibm.com = = = = = = |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |Nigel Daley = = | >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |general@hadoop.apache.org = = | >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |2010/12/21 02:26 PM = = | >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| |Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release = = | >--------------------------------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------| I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track, so = I'll volunteer to do it. Its been a while since I was the release manager s= o I'll need help. Looks like in Jira we currently have: 26 MR blockers: http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg 17 HDFS blockers: http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl 6 HADOOP blockers: http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2 Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of these are truly blockers. I'll start cleaning up the list and ping fol= ks after the holidays. Cheers, Nige On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to= hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. >> >> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it doesn't have the features that I think it needs. >> >> -- Owen >> > > That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. > Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for = 22 with 6685? > = --1__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Not sure what state this issue is in, would be nice for 0.22

https://i= ssues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941

I don't see it in the lists below. It's a bit of a blocker running on = non-Sun (Oracle) JREs.

<= td width=3D"171" valign=3D"middle"> =
Ken (K.N.) Walker 2670 Queensview Drive
J9 Java Class Libraries Lead Ottawa, Ontario K2B 8K1
Java Technology Centre Can= ada
IBM Software Group = 3D""
Phone:+1-613-356-5021 3D""
e-mail:ken_walker@ca.ibm.com3D""



3D"InactiveNigel Daley ---2010/= 12/21 02:26:32 PM---I think it's important we get more frequent release= s back on track, so I'll volunteer to do it. Its

=
3D=
From:
= 3D""
Nigel Daley <ndaley@mac.com>
3D=
To:

general@hadoop.apache.org
3D=
Date:
= 3D""
2010/12/21 02:26 PM
3D=
Subject:
3D""
Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release





I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track,= so I'll volunteer to do it.  Its been a while since I was the rel= ease manager so I'll need help.

Looks like in Jira we currently have:
 26 MR blockers:
= http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg
 17 HDFS blockers:
http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl
 6 HADOOP blockers:
http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2
Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of = these are truly blockers.  I'll start cleaning up the list and pin= g folks after the holidays.

Cheers,
Nige

On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:

>
> On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't cr= itical to hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to = bring.
>>
>> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holdi= ng up 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, i= f it doesn't have the features that I think it needs.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>
> That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort.
> Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager f= or 22 with 6685?
>



= --1__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710-- --0__=0ABBF292DFF2B7108f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBF292DFF2B710-- From general-return-2573-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 18:02:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15467 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 18:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 18:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 95446 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 18:02:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95362 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 18:02:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95343 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 18:02:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:02:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dsikar@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:02:03 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so2771035ywo.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:01:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SFoWc6OZIL0gZ67myRS20YS/7PU80v8mao+mjxKZKEU=; b=VjzpHPs9RL6YExfEWIeH9d33MKlYRXLfYV95I4LMROMqUWWq2IO613WuGdbt2tjR46 TkLRwVhwNlhxe7KUWi2qi/bSNsIm1jsnfnT6b/klQRe4Ab+y4+EBHSvcW+thBmkWy15k Wwa3cbnofJV046VfpIgQnA0suliLRc8DnZ1C0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EsWZchD49SZAnRDhzEaj1F6GaYDGQ4rUPZNrDduHNPmCIOq1Dr7pudI/LMPaxNmGBg bb1h752QDB/5Cpk3hfC/63jPzJTEnysA8uQV+9z5sVa2SDFKIvkIHUe2a9uhxDtciZHT 3UEogXA8VOEUwNBfQakSADnUWIRzwxSWn9llo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.49.7 with SMTP id w7mr4950839agw.55.1293040902832; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.62.15 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:01:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:01:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot From: daniel sikar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I can't help but with hindsight - it's advisable to snapshot your namenodes as HDFS dies with them. On 22 December 2010 15:03, Bjoern Schiessle wrote: > Hi, > > After a Kernel update and a reboot the namenode doesn't start. I run the > Cloudera cdh3 Hadoop distribution. I have already searched for a solution= . > It looks like I'm not the only one with such a problem. Sadly I could onl= y > find descriptions of similar problems, but no solutions... > > This is the error message from the namenode log file: > > > 2010-12-22 16:13:04,830 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameN= ode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG: =A0 host =3D pcube/129.69.216.24 > STARTUP_MSG: =A0 args =3D [] > STARTUP_MSG: =A0 version =3D 0.20.2+737 > STARTUP_MSG: =A0 build =3D =A0-r 98c55c28258aa6f42250569bd7fa431ac657bdbd= ; compiled by 'root' on Mon Oct 11 17:21:30 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,001 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: In= itializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,007 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metri= cs.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.= apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNam= esystem: fsOwner=3Dhdfs > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNam= esystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNam= esystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dfalse > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,040 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNam= esystem: isAccessTokenEnabled=3Dfalse accessKeyUpdateInterval=3D0 min(s), a= ccessTokenLifetime=3D0 min(s) > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metri= cs.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context obje= ct:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,336 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNam= esystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,361 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage= : Number of files =3D 72 > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,374 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage= : Number of files under construction =3D 3 > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,375 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage= : Image file of size 8822 loaded in 0 seconds. > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.Name= Node: java.lang.NullPointerException > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addC= hild(FSDirectory.java:1088) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addC= hild(FSDirectory.java:1100) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addN= ode(FSDirectory.java:1003) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.unpr= otectedAddFile(FSDirectory.java:206) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFS= Edits(FSEditLog.java:637) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEd= its(FSImage.java:1034) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSIm= age(FSImage.java:845) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverT= ransitionRead(FSImage.java:379) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.load= FSImage(FSDirectory.java:99) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.ini= tialize(FSNamesystem.java:343) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:317) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initial= ize(NameNode.java:214) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(= NameNode.java:394) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createN= ameNode(NameNode.java:1148) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(Na= meNode.java:1157) > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameN= ode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at pcube/129.69.216.24 > ************************************************************/ > > Any idea what could be wrong and how I can get my namenode up running aga= in? > > Thanks a lot! > Bj=F6rn > From general-return-2574-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 19:50:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65880 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 41843 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 19:50:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41622 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 19:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41614 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 19:50:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:50:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:50:05 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2806997yxm.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:49:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JCAAtuDU1ib2S1Gm36HnVjIUHyJwWOzYb/SyTyvSr+0=; b=McQ904JRZvLdsOG1Fg460Fg6kHo11Xf6wtXyjKmAh9p0abTJdAEsO3Q/0MAM4dcYgT I8OdI63IVS3RrJmeFA88XLcvy1xhdCwsg+2nokWc/EuOFEVSJpzzu3L1zBB7Edt91cq2 sOnA7xQCHOO8u2OYpizH3Pa7vTEX+9eUulF+U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=j6SgOYA/APflULnYdZVQ83pKAqnBlMyaAisXIgfDqex/r3mYnWOaguvcXlSnNvfOaq W8ya+9tSrupKCpAuA634ak2wjJ1VmcRnFs+KmhQ+yREC0P/YBKqFdVYuZjOzWRdo2Aap aiOe0DEl4MQtuReF/wuEg/ACkKpgR8qEbFLk0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.44 with SMTP id e32mr3821030yhg.37.1293047384288; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:49:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> References: <27F4E872-C226-4386-9148-077F0044B6E9@Holsman.net> <05ED6FF7-6236-47F4-B5DD-8E927971C72D@apache.org> <39694716-7EF6-41B8-8862-D2DE03A4560C@Holsman.NET> <9FC0DEC0-524A-4A35-88A6-17473DD74929@apache.org> <2DE2238D-DDFF-4CE3-B50C-39D617AA13E8@mac.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:49:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plans for the 0.22 Release From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c0104ade90498050e3e --0023547c8c0104ade90498050e3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is great! Thanks, Nigel. I haven't seen the feature freeze for 0.22 formally announced. May be it worth confirming it now by setting the start day, as of yesterday? --Konstantin On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think it's important we get more frequent releases back on track, so I'll > volunteer to do it. Its been a while since I was the release manager so > I'll need help. > > Looks like in Jira we currently have: > 26 MR blockers: http://tinyurl.com/23s5vzg > 17 HDFS blockers: http://tinyurl.com/27w82vl > 6 HADOOP blockers: http://tinyurl.com/2bmycl2 > Now that we are past feature freeze (i.e. branch creation), not all of > these are truly blockers. I'll start cleaning up the list and ping folks > after the holidays. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > >>> Everyone who has discussed this patch has said it isn't critical to > hadoop, and It's holding up everything else 0.22 is going to bring. > >> > >> I disagree that it isn't critical to Hadoop, but I'm not holding up > 0.22. I'm just not volunteering to spend my time working on it, if it > doesn't have the features that I think it needs. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > > > > That's a fair point.. and this is a volunteer effort. > > Do we have anybody else who is willing to be the release manager for 22 > with 6685? > > > > --0023547c8c0104ade90498050e3e-- From general-return-2575-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 22 23:31:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76790 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 23:31:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 23:31:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 18470 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 23:31:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18423 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2010 23:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18415 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2010 23:31:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:31:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:31:12 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5634991fxm.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:30:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=imA9QrMy5kUTBeq2u5lK4S6Dw5hC+M/zi+6sAteDIsQ=; b=BBcPUgTH36sNRbG8Pz1btAvwurFNkLwOulANVLclKLF4XeQ7F9tRF0wObz0s7oG/+t RJkJ1lbNTCTXvTLWpwxWHsS2xHoBxPd+gPtZ70l0+NRiEYBjzMlYd7HEIPeb/SDWzEwq 8d4/qYSb/f7ImGpPBP70oK0d3w0k8M7x5Wsj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=JoTCgyglMxhUNyOqBmz0VDGi7eWEtyJf4GCJZcVcjgXDamEgBIrGWpmL5dLgj+kcqu DvilQWnzT6HlcCZX6X4ndglUJ90UgTheO2NzWjM0SxbLSorHcxZDblp1ExMlvV8GbQK3 BHRTCFQrpD53HVx4ZQcdYAvqecz+Renvdyq7M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.198 with SMTP id i6mr238233fan.10.1293060650966; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:30:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:30:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:30:50 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gvYS9bVclohJtuG6LlZ7-1IkCQA Message-ID: Subject: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I propose cutting a release from the tip of the branch-0.20-append branch [1]. I suggest the release be called hadoop-0.20.0-append. I volunteer to run the release process. Are folks OK with this? Here's some background. The branch-0.20-append was forked from branch-0.20 a few months ago by Dhruba to add an append/sync to 0.20.x era HDFS. The added append facility is made of the patches attached to HDFS-200 and then a bunch of fixup patches done by Dhruba, Hairong, Nicolas, Todd, and others. For a complete list of differences from the tip of the Hadoop branch-0.20, see the CHANGE.txt file in branch-0.20-append [2]. The HDFS-200 append/sync is not the same as the append/sync implementation that is in hadoop 0.21.x and hadoop TRUNK. The branch-0.20-append is a relatively small deviation from hadoop 0.20.x for those who want an append/sync in an (Apache) hadoop 0.20.x [3]. Its for those unwilling to upgrade their clusters to hadoop 0.21.0 and for those who can't wait on the coming hadoop 0.22.0. For applications like HBase [4], an application that runs on HDFS and "loses data" if no working append/sync, its critical that there is an Apache release with a working append/sync. A few of us have been playing with this branch with a while and it seems to do the right thing. Its fairly close to what FB runs internally (correct me if I'm wrong in this last statement Dhruba). Thanks, St.Ack 1. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/ 2. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/CHANGES.txt?view=markup 3. Cloudera's CDH3Beta2/3 already include an append/sync based off the HDFS-200++ work. There is no 'official' Apache hadoop 0.20.x with a working append/sync. 4. http://hbase.apache.org From general-return-2576-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 00:06:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57431 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 00:06:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 00:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 53807 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 00:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53769 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 00:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53761 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 00:06:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:06:28 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so2222978vws.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.188.141 with SMTP id da13mr2057014vcb.76.1293062765490; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.0.49] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm1537330vch.44.2010.12.22.16.06.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:06:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:05:57 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi St.Ack. In general I'm opposed to such a thing. There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out there, I don't think there = is a need for another. (personal opinion, not a veto or speaking as the = chair) Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that = has this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been = applied since 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? Would this be too much effort for = you to RM?..=20 I understand there is a large QA effort you would be taking on if you = do. does the Append/Sync semantics break/deviate too much from 0.20.2 ? I really don't want to come to a^h^h^h^hget out of the situation where = we have multiple releases of 0.20 each with a unique feature. On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Stack wrote: > I propose cutting a release from the tip of the branch-0.20-append > branch [1]. I suggest the release be called hadoop-0.20.0-append. I > volunteer to run the release process. Are folks OK with this? >=20 > Here's some background. >=20 > The branch-0.20-append was forked from branch-0.20 a few months ago by > Dhruba to add an append/sync to 0.20.x era HDFS. The added append > facility is made of the patches attached to HDFS-200 and then a bunch > of fixup patches done by Dhruba, Hairong, Nicolas, Todd, and others. > For a complete list of differences from the tip of the Hadoop > branch-0.20, see the CHANGE.txt file in branch-0.20-append [2]. The > HDFS-200 append/sync is not the same as the append/sync implementation > that is in hadoop 0.21.x and hadoop TRUNK. >=20 > The branch-0.20-append is a relatively small deviation from hadoop > 0.20.x for those who want an append/sync in an (Apache) hadoop 0.20.x > [3]. Its for those unwilling to upgrade their clusters to hadoop > 0.21.0 and for those who can't wait on the coming hadoop 0.22.0. For > applications like HBase [4], an application that runs on HDFS and > "loses data" if no working append/sync, its critical that there is an > Apache release with a working append/sync. >=20 > A few of us have been playing with this branch with a while and it > seems to do the right thing. Its fairly close to what FB runs > internally (correct me if I'm wrong in this last statement Dhruba). >=20 > Thanks, > St.Ack >=20 > 1. = http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/ > 2. = http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/CHA= NGES.txt?view=3Dmarkup > 3. Cloudera's CDH3Beta2/3 already include an append/sync based off the > HDFS-200++ work. There is no 'official' Apache hadoop 0.20.x with a > working append/sync. > 4. http://hbase.apache.org From general-return-2577-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 00:33:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70488 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 00:33:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 00:33:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 72453 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 00:33:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72328 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 00:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72320 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 00:33:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:33:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:33:43 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5669196fxm.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=0jAw9WC0GYgza4DcxR4FttGwrZSFQ5VlY83PjD/nWnQ=; b=fw8IOAyjOQfeGwumItExNrNv364p3ktY5d0x/8fH+Dv2UglOiBK/ry/5lqpMlaUsws MpdR5Gpl5CzaLflpgHUkHuYs/QoQYWelpvKxchOYOFWfCfFR/LWQ2/n14W8INTEe4+Ev roaNGH63sMm5hAw8J+Gny/DuLzr1msD3f9Wj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ir4bNJVfSQImb+lI+iJGKTRlabBZcAIE3G/hYc4ZtWAiCQBrMWn9r5DrXkxtgCQtLb DhPXMiQdMWUFwpt3OGHoM0MOPAPY/mQski1n8QNdDamQV/iOpm5whS41RBySJXuoeVyj ZyODA6I4HbtkefwZ9GCMhxbvBijiEc0qlEYyI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.146 with SMTP id l18mr3308711far.67.1293064402188; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:33:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:33:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:33:22 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5bY_mIY4tdPi9UYF3RmdTPjIqMc Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out there, I don't think there is a need for another. (personal opinion, not a veto or speaking as the chair) > Are you counting other than Apache releases? (I see only 4 here, two of which probably should be removed: http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.) > Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that has this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been applied since 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? Would this be too much effort for you to RM?.. > I'd like that but my sense is the general populace of hadoopers would think the append/sync suite of patches destabilizing -- append/sync has a long 'history' in hadoop -- and a violation of the general principal that bug fixes only are added on a branch. > I really don't want to come to a^h^h^h^hget out of the situation where we have multiple releases of 0.20 each with a unique feature. > Sure. The notion has been broached before up on these lists -- e.g. there was talk of a 0.20 Apache release that had security in it -- and at the time folks seemed amenable. Thanks for getting the discussion off the ground, St.Ack From general-return-2578-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 01:04:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84912 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 01:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 01:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 94699 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94553 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94544 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 01:04:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:04:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:04:29 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so2238624vws.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.186.200 with SMTP id ct8mr1786540vcb.256.1293066247400; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.0.49] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bq5sm1540948vcb.32.2010.12.22.17.04.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:04:06 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:03:59 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Stack wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >> There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out there, I don't think = there is a need for another. (personal opinion, not a veto or speaking = as the chair) >>=20 >=20 > Are you counting other than Apache releases? (I see only 4 here, two > of which probably should be removed: > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.) yes.. I was referring to the external companies who have decided to = release their own version, for their own business purposes. (please = don't take that as a negative). >=20 >> Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that = has this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been = applied since 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? Would this be too much effort for = you to RM?.. >>=20 >=20 > I'd like that but my sense is the general populace of hadoopers would > think the append/sync suite of patches destabilizing -- append/sync > has a long 'history' in hadoop -- and a violation of the general > principal that bug fixes only are added on a branch. I'm open with adding it, as lack of append/sync could be seen as a bug = to some. (yes i'm playing with words) >=20 >=20 >> I really don't want to come to a^h^h^h^hget out of the situation = where we have multiple releases of 0.20 each with a unique feature. >>=20 >=20 > Sure. The notion has been broached before up on these lists -- e.g. > there was talk of a 0.20 Apache release that had security in it -- and > at the time folks seemed amenable. I think that approach encourages groups of individuals/companies to = huddle up together to build large features without taking the larger = group into account and then 'drop' the feature off and wait for others = to thank them & port it to their releases. We then become multiple = communities instead of a single one.=20 We will end up with Apache+Security release vs Apache+Append release vs = Apache+Avatar release, with various bug-fixes sprinkled into each. And I'm not sure which release Pig or Hbase would target to develop = against. Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get companies to build = their new features on trunk against that. >=20 > Thanks for getting the discussion off the ground, > St.Ack From general-return-2579-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 01:30:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3400 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 01:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 01:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 14616 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:30:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14565 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14557 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 01:30:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of li.j2ee@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:30:39 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6042872bwz.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:30:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FHXZPPydYZmlzo3TfpVOy8m/ycgBhxHiIASOqyVo0dg=; b=pKMZVBoyouTNmMMBitF69Y3TnEeRw7lYg+lKmmEUBQS5dBF6pe68ceTCwnCzxrgg3q G3Q8tv4ljz24vGW9/35HHscUzszueytOb2+rlp4et9Q2hhW182mVVeQAq4bGzgyqf79j Ldrxxlh0iUPyEoLMcSVHg6izfMuk7lt3Ynk2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Z7WzM8Wl0Ll8qfceOchdafDLlryRtAd61muoLb9a8Fc+sop0qBfgkDX7XS04/pdQYl OumCOTZ3tcePqhia9qK317EW73C/OpI9m39sAzLJpRNQP54jA2ILcU1qsQsLtQo7q3ug ptN+P65VUsN8nu+DXsTFlyRzfPW5vtDaETD/A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.102.146 with SMTP id g18mr2605390bko.163.1293067817964; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:30:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.138.67 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:30:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot From: li ping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d6456ff5d387049809cfe1 --0016e6d6456ff5d387049809cfe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It seems the exception occurs during NameNode loads the editlog. make sure the editlog file exists. or you can debug the application to see what's wrong. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:01 AM, daniel sikar wrote: > I can't help but with hindsight - it's advisable to snapshot your > namenodes as HDFS dies with them. > > On 22 December 2010 15:03, Bjoern Schiessle wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After a Kernel update and a reboot the namenode doesn't start. I run th= e > > Cloudera cdh3 Hadoop distribution. I have already searched for a > solution. > > It looks like I'm not the only one with such a problem. Sadly I could > only > > find descriptions of similar problems, but no solutions... > > > > This is the error message from the namenode log file: > > > > > > 2010-12-22 16:13:04,830 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > > /************************************************************ > > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > > STARTUP_MSG: host =3D pcube/129.69.216.24 > > STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [] > > STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2+737 > > STARTUP_MSG: build =3D -r 98c55c28258aa6f42250569bd7fa431ac657bdbd; > compiled by 'root' on Mon Oct 11 17:21:30 UTC 2010 > > ************************************************************/ > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,001 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=3DNameNode, sessionId=3Dnull > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,007 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializ= ing > NameNodeMeterics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Dhdfs > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergr= oup > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,036 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > isPermissionEnabled=3Dfalse > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,040 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > isAccessTokenEnabled=3Dfalse accessKeyUpdateInterval=3D0 min(s), > accessTokenLifetime=3D0 min(s) > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,335 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: > Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context > object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,336 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered > FSNamesystemStatusMBean > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,361 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files =3D 72 > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,374 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under > construction =3D 3 > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,375 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 8822 loa= ded > in 0 seconds. > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: > java.lang.NullPointerException > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addChild(FSDirectory.j= ava:1088) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addChild(FSDirectory.j= ava:1100) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addNode(FSDirectory.ja= va:1003) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.unprotectedAddFile(FSD= irectory.java:206) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.ja= va:637) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:1= 034) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:8= 45) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSIm= age.java:379) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirector= y.java:99) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesyst= em.java:343) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.j= ava:317) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:= 214) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:394) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:1148) > > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1157) > > > > 2010-12-22 16:13:05,377 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > > /************************************************************ > > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at pcube/129.69.216.24 > > ************************************************************/ > > > > Any idea what could be wrong and how I can get my namenode up running > again? > > > > Thanks a lot! > > Bj=C3=B6rn > > > --=20 -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 --0016e6d6456ff5d387049809cfe1-- From general-return-2580-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 01:47:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9176 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 01:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 30241 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30128 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30120 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:47:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:47:05 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5707604fxm.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:46:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3iqluXAPJ7Tq6CCcNkHaoS7R6Sg+ckZOMOa3q9vM7Dw=; b=ncKBpmOPUMryyyTyIig5vODGq9IlCy0BK2oNkRFx5lwrChx0XTFvpOHiOTLOImapS5 4l6/d40mc4w/ELkFQmHIZydpEMg1Ox/mnInsLY+YMNa8yCG002Z2dOFteqdCDZJDexVG D8QV8SZ5yRacf+cCBiEwMI5r1d09CfnMctp4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rpsfgi4tXmIvjmLxM/hcV5o/PL+S/odKxuduAOROUE1F91PnGh9Ihwez1iU9FW4lrr ArDQ2VfvfNXTt9QiQUyfQgWL5Oq0je8NumM1laTfW4G1PUHPJ5tOHC1cnppyIo94LRNu siZVN9qdx4J0LEZyLpmnU0F+/bibQ6EYh0heg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.72.14 with SMTP id k14mr802414faj.45.1293068803364; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.83.200 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:46:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:46:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a203b1d70004980a0a93 --20cf3054a203b1d70004980a0a93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get companies to build their new features on trunk against that. There was a thread in Nov - 'Caution using Hadoop 0.21' It would be helpful to see response to 0.22 > > > > Thanks for getting the discussion off the ground, > > St.Ack > > --20cf3054a203b1d70004980a0a93-- From general-return-2581-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 01:47:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9422 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 01:47:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 31924 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31880 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31870 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:47:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.219] (HELO nm22.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:47:28 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.195] by nm22.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2010 01:47:07 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.158] by tm8.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2010 01:47:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1041.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2010 01:47:07 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 236839.75870.bm@omp1041.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99646 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Dec 2010 01:47:07 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293068827; bh=b3KHOrGnZ+wYUYHZ3FxBRzUz/RDQ+CiHx0oPTNbbTes=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QD7ZlGNAbLjZC4H6ohEyoaVXdVhOL3fgERc0qfZx7hILRmQf1xhKUVa7CFzxIc2Y4oOwnAYQTc7eQYHeN1nm3sFHEdw335bL0Dltg/pk2z2DizyStdFqNm7MQLV8ii/mduyOikNIvPeCwzMno/jfea5MURGtmQVfErmW+Y0Vx0I= Message-ID: <70915.86754.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3W9NZLkVM1kwPm8ayxSj845GAohnkPcUtuQb6WYQaMUF7Ih agUaLS4s3ee6Q2_lz15bnFrxIULeKV6NKp1fYfyxDYeRh86HAlzOaPSRRZoD Bo4yJ3YX37_yX3CyA9ueSsTSCuKAnUTw.FTD9u5idfumVDcNuL7WKJuFr.QU PPbIuNXXlAjrvuAPPVRVTmwW4WcuFd8KZAjrlA3BLLB.7R_sReTFPQrt4_lX h88j_sKCK8LGf2_GJK9pd2zEqe4IVyP8EhHgCYwoxf9YlupbI8.HOq7mKPo_ IKTZnY4l8LAoZ9_f5lpvlxcJzkneS7l25eRxwav1sLhQIPpxg5un1UqYkASk rzTiEuBKF2.hWti4NX6rmFBHQTORfX6I9G7AnuQGpBKG850xAfBjTBJl3RdE jgv7cpJFzw6Is Received: from [69.111.79.82] by web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:47:06 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:47:06 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm on the HBase PMC.=0A=0A> We will end up with Apache+Security release vs= =0A> Apache+Append release vs Apache+Avatar release,=0A=0AThe current situa= tion is pretty close to this. =0A=0AHBase has no suitable binary ASF Hadoop= release to work against, currently. Vanilla version 0.20 does not have syn= c/append support. We recommend users adopt Cloudera's CDH3 beta 2, or compi= le the 0.20-append branch from source. Version 0.21 is marked as unstable, = was not tested at scale by Yahoo (unlike 0.20), and has been panned by many= would be adopters, if the various tweets and blog posts I have seen in tha= t regard are any indication.=0A=0A> Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 = ASAP and get=0A> companies to build their new features on trunk against=0A>= that.=0A=0AIf Hadoop 0.22 is not vetted at high scale as was 0.20 -- this = is the current situation with 0.21 -- then I fear the current situation wil= l not change and HBase will still to refer would be users to a non-ASF rele= ase or a source-only branch. =0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0AProbl= ems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.=0A - Piet Hein (vi= a Tom White)=0A=0A=0A--- On Wed, 12/22/10, Ian Holsman = wrote:=0A=0A> From: Ian Holsman =0A> Subject: Re: DISC= USSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-appe= nd branch?=0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Wednesday, December = 22, 2010, 5:03 PM=0A> =0A> On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Stack wrote:=0A> = =0A> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Holsman =0A= > wrote:=0A> >> There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out=0A> there, I d= on't think there is a need for another. (personal=0A> opinion, not a veto o= r speaking as the chair)=0A> >> =0A> > =0A> > Are you counting other than A= pache releases?=A0 (I=0A> see only 4 here, two=0A> > of which probably shou= ld be removed:=0A> > http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.)= =0A> =0A> =0A> yes.. I was referring to the external companies who have=0A>= decided to release their own version, for their own business=0A> purposes.= (please don't take that as a negative).=0A> =0A> > =0A> >> Is there a reas= on why we couldn't create a hadoop=0A> 0.20.3 release that has this patch i= nside of it, as well as=0A> other fixes that have been applied since 0.20.2= (~26=0A> patches)? Would this be too much effort for you to RM?..=0A> >> = =0A> > =0A> > I'd like that but my sense is the general populace of=0A> had= oopers would=0A> > think the append/sync suite of patches destabilizing=0A>= -- append/sync=0A> > has a long 'history' in hadoop -- and a violation of= =0A> the general=0A> > principal that bug fixes only are added on a branch.= =0A> =0A> I'm open with adding it, as lack of append/sync could be=0A> seen= as a bug to some. (yes i'm playing with words)=0A> > =0A> > =0A> >> I real= ly don't want to come to a^h^h^h^hget out of=0A> the situation where we hav= e multiple releases of 0.20 each=0A> with a unique feature.=0A> >> =0A> > = =0A> > Sure.=A0 The notion has been broached before up on=0A> these lists -= - e.g.=0A> > there was talk of a 0.20 Apache release that had=0A> security = in it -- and=0A> > at the time folks seemed amenable.=0A> =0A> I think that= approach encourages groups of=0A> individuals/companies to huddle up toget= her to build large=0A> features without taking the larger group into accoun= t and=0A> then 'drop' the feature off and wait for others to thank=0A> them= & port it to their releases. We then become=0A> multiple communities inste= ad of a single one. =0A> =0A> We will end up with Apache+Security release v= s=0A> Apache+Append release vs Apache+Avatar release, with various=0A> bug-= fixes sprinkled into each.=0A> And I'm not sure which release Pig or Hbase = would target to=0A> develop against.=0A> =0A> Thats why I think we should g= o to 0.22 ASAP and get=0A> companies to build their new features on trunk a= gainst=0A> that.=0A> =0A> > =0A> > Thanks for getting the discussion off th= e ground,=0A> > St.Ack=0A> =0A> =0A=0A=0A From general-return-2582-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 03:32:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48734 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 03:32:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 03:32:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 86406 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 03:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86209 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 03:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86196 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 03:32:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:32:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:31:55 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so2274169vws.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:31:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.98.208 with SMTP id r16mr2013865vcn.135.1293075092599; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.0.49] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s9sm1567945vcr.46.2010.12.22.19.31.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:31:32 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <70915.86754.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:31:22 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <772F419F-1B2F-4BDA-870A-EB66FC4218DB@Holsman.NET> References: <70915.86754.qm@web65513.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 23, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I'm on the HBase PMC. >=20 >> We will end up with Apache+Security release vs >> Apache+Append release vs Apache+Avatar release, >=20 > The current situation is pretty close to this.=20 agreed. and I would like to make it better >=20 > HBase has no suitable binary ASF Hadoop release to work against, = currently. Vanilla version 0.20 does not have sync/append support. We = recommend users adopt Cloudera's CDH3 beta 2, or compile the 0.20-append = branch from source. Version 0.21 is marked as unstable, was not tested = at scale by Yahoo (unlike 0.20), and has been panned by many would be = adopters, if the various tweets and blog posts I have seen in that = regard are any indication. >=20 I'd like to make two points here: 1. There is no substitute for your own QA team. You can never rely on a single company to do your testing for you. While = it was great Yahoo tested the initial releases, you can see by their own = distribution that what they were/are running is different to what other = people are running.=20 It is better for people to not blindly trust that just because company X = is claiming that the are running something that it will work for them, = and we cannot just rely on a individual or single company to provide = that service going forward. Communities don't work that way. And = reliance on a single company to provide your core infrastructure for = gratis isn't really going to end up well either. =20 Saying that, we are very lucky that Yahoo has chosen to openly = contribute as much as they have, and I look forward to them and other = large installation's contributions and participation going forward. 2. Hadoop is only one piece of the puzzle for most installations. One of the other issues with 0.21 (and with future releases going = forward) is that 3rd parties did not port/upgrade their software to run = with our new APIs. Without major software like Hbase, Pig, Hive being = able to run on the platform, major installations won't even bother = looking at it. I don't expect people to immediately upgrade to 0.22 when we release it. = I expect it will take a good 3-6 months until people have the software = they run available on it, and possibly a point release with some of = problems people have found in their own testing fixed in our and other = software.=20 Like I said, I don't mind getting 0.20.3 released with the append/sync = patch applied to it (with the other 20 or so patches), but I don't think = the Hadoop team is large enough to support all the different releases = as-is, let alone another one. --Ian >> Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get >> companies to build their new features on trunk against >> that. >=20 > If Hadoop 0.22 is not vetted at high scale as was 0.20 -- this is the = current situation with 0.21 -- then I fear the current situation will = not change and HBase will still to refer would be users to a non-ASF = release or a source-only branch.=20 >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > - Andy >=20 > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. > - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >=20 >=20 > --- On Wed, 12/22/10, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >> From: Ian Holsman >> Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the = tip of branch-0.20-append branch? >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2010, 5:03 PM >>=20 >> On Dec 23, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Stack wrote: >>=20 >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Holsman >> wrote: >>>> There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out >> there, I don't think there is a need for another. (personal >> opinion, not a veto or speaking as the chair) >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Are you counting other than Apache releases? (I >> see only 4 here, two >>> of which probably should be removed: >>> http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.) >>=20 >>=20 >> yes.. I was referring to the external companies who have >> decided to release their own version, for their own business >> purposes. (please don't take that as a negative). >>=20 >>>=20 >>>> Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop >> 0.20.3 release that has this patch inside of it, as well as >> other fixes that have been applied since 0.20.2 (~26 >> patches)? Would this be too much effort for you to RM?.. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I'd like that but my sense is the general populace of >> hadoopers would >>> think the append/sync suite of patches destabilizing >> -- append/sync >>> has a long 'history' in hadoop -- and a violation of >> the general >>> principal that bug fixes only are added on a branch. >>=20 >> I'm open with adding it, as lack of append/sync could be >> seen as a bug to some. (yes i'm playing with words) >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> I really don't want to come to a^h^h^h^hget out of >> the situation where we have multiple releases of 0.20 each >> with a unique feature. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Sure. The notion has been broached before up on >> these lists -- e.g. >>> there was talk of a 0.20 Apache release that had >> security in it -- and >>> at the time folks seemed amenable. >>=20 >> I think that approach encourages groups of >> individuals/companies to huddle up together to build large >> features without taking the larger group into account and >> then 'drop' the feature off and wait for others to thank >> them & port it to their releases. We then become >> multiple communities instead of a single one.=20 >>=20 >> We will end up with Apache+Security release vs >> Apache+Append release vs Apache+Avatar release, with various >> bug-fixes sprinkled into each. >> And I'm not sure which release Pig or Hbase would target to >> develop against. >>=20 >> Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get >> companies to build their new features on trunk against >> that. >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Thanks for getting the discussion off the ground, >>> St.Ack >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-2583-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 05:32:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87985 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 05:32:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 05:32:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 49683 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 05:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49347 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 05:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49333 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 05:32:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:32:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:32:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 87934 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 05:31:54 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:31:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6157892bwz.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:31:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.122.17 with SMTP id j17mr4203940bkr.4.1293082312538; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.76.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:31:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:31:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de04bfe77afc04980d2fec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6de04bfe77afc04980d2fec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi St.Ack. > > In general I'm opposed to such a thing. > > There are already 5 Hadoop 20.x releases out there, I don't think there is > a need for another. > Stack is trying to get an Apache version of Hadoop that solves his problem. He's been asking for it for a year now. If the 20-append branch is stable, we should release it. > > Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that has > this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been applied since > 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? It is of course possible, but no one has done the work to build the version and test it out. As to what to call it, I'm a little hesitant to call it 0.20.3 at this point, since the last time I asked it was considered a fairly risky change. If it goes badly, it would mean an incompatible revert onto a branch that has been stable for 1.5 years. I'd much rather call it 0.20-append.0 and use 0.20.3 for straight bugfixes. -- Owen --0016e6de04bfe77afc04980d2fec-- From general-return-2584-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 06:16:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3842 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 06:16:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 06:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 76579 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 06:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76293 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 06:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76284 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 06:16:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:16:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:16:20 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5831390fxm.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:16:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLl0cY8olPKnJudpcgBTWxu/naJakzMk2sPtIYHsPVw=; b=o0ey5fSTVaKVHBqfDbrtAj9UKv+B3v5fzHBA+NB0gzPG/CQd3W1IQoimms9fTtwY/9 Riw3Xu6p6oc6jIm2d8Ub3OeXeWJ0qFrhyUh6zvh2JdnFWr3sloT+KPtauFVrlAPO/jJu Huj06ocF7zUtsPdh7kJ+OVRGkMjNXSjZ/HhBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nbT+zzzMHQ5+oUYq1oBEifwaMRgPN8gQTlqUwCxLNoFpyZJBlw+eD/5kqtibSc7/Mt BU7254uVC3Gaa+zIo4OmaR/gFmhQiz8/O+dDaHTccz4T8CkrovRLmZjdVaqTnotzggVn lUTl1FB2C/5Od8yZHt3s50zWHyIHLi4k4h0HY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.125.196 with SMTP id z4mr3814747far.124.1293084960499; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:16:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:16:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:16:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vsVNaYLZGUfR28ZI8DlUiZbjmMs Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:> >> Are you counting other than Apache releases? =A0(I see only 4 here, two >> of which probably should be removed: >> http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.) > > > yes.. I was referring to the external companies who have decided to relea= se their own version, for their own business purposes. (please don't take t= hat as a negative). > Oh. I was not counting those at all. Currently, over in HBase we tell users build and 'trust' your own Hadoop binary from the tip of what to them probably looks like some random Hadoop branch OR go get the slick Cloudera pre-builts since Cloudera's CDH3s have append/sync. By offering to release a hadoop-0.20.0-append, I was just trying to make some remiss for a gaping hole in the Apache Hadoop offering. >>> Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that h= as this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been applied s= ince 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? Would this be too much effort for you to RM?.. >>> >> ... > > I'm open with adding it, as lack of append/sync could be seen as a bug to= some. (yes i'm playing with words) My guess is that few would see it the way you do. Append/sync has had a long torturous history. HADOOP-1700, the original append issue, was originally opened in August 2007. There have been two implementations. The one in branch-0.20-append is the 'deprecated' implementation; i.e. its not the append that is in Hadoop TRUNK (though IIUC the 'deprecated' append runs on the largest 'known' HDFS cluster). At least once, append was part of a release and then pulled because it was 'destabilizing'. It might be hard getting such a storied, scarred feature in as a 'bug fix'. If it did go in, the append/sync is of such a reputation that it might sully the current good standing hadoop 0.20 branch releases hold. That said, I'm cavalier and if others are game, I'd be up for running a 0.20.3 release that included it. > Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get companies to build th= eir new features on trunk against that. > Waiting on 0.22 and its adoption is not going to work for HBase. The HBase project would be long dead if waiting on 0.22 were the only option available to us. In fact we'd be dead already if it wasn't for the lifeline thrown us by the folks who hooked us up with branch-0.20-append. St.Ack From general-return-2585-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 06:25:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4463 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 06:25:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 06:25:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 80860 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 06:25:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80722 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 06:25:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80714 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 06:25:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:25:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:25:10 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2726756gxk.35 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.52.9 with SMTP id z9mr11657350ybz.335.1293085488046; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:24:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [49.194.41.124] ([49.194.41.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r24sm9519004yba.18.2010.12.22.22.24.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:24:47 -0800 (PST) References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:24:38 +1100 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In that case, I'm +1 on releasing a 20+append branch, but am nervous on how m= uch effort will be put into testing it. But this option is better than the c= urrent apache alternative out there as you and Owen mentioned.=20 --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangel= o On 23/12/2010, at 5:16 PM, Stack wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:> >>> Are you counting other than Apache releases? (I see only 4 here, two >>> of which probably should be removed: >>> http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/apache//hadoop/core/.) >>=20 >>=20 >> yes.. I was referring to the external companies who have decided to relea= se their own version, for their own business purposes. (please don't take th= at as a negative). >>=20 >=20 > Oh. I was not counting those at all. >=20 > Currently, over in HBase we tell users build and 'trust' your own > Hadoop binary from the tip of what to them probably looks like some > random Hadoop branch OR go get the slick Cloudera pre-builts since > Cloudera's CDH3s have append/sync. By offering to release a > hadoop-0.20.0-append, I was just trying to make some remiss for a > gaping hole in the Apache Hadoop offering. >=20 >=20 >>>> Is there a reason why we couldn't create a hadoop 0.20.3 release that h= as this patch inside of it, as well as other fixes that have been applied si= nce 0.20.2 (~26 patches)? Would this be too much effort for you to RM?.. >>>>=20 >>> ... >>=20 >> I'm open with adding it, as lack of append/sync could be seen as a bug to= some. (yes i'm playing with words) >=20 > My guess is that few would see it the way you do. Append/sync has had > a long torturous history. HADOOP-1700, the original append issue, was > originally opened in August 2007. There have been two > implementations. The one in branch-0.20-append is the 'deprecated' > implementation; i.e. its not the append that is in Hadoop TRUNK > (though IIUC the 'deprecated' append runs on the largest 'known' HDFS > cluster). At least once, append was part of a release and then pulled > because it was 'destabilizing'. It might be hard getting such a > storied, scarred feature in as a 'bug fix'. If it did go in, the > append/sync is of such a reputation that it might sully the current > good standing hadoop 0.20 branch releases hold. >=20 > That said, I'm cavalier and if others are game, I'd be up for running > a 0.20.3 release that included it. >=20 >> Thats why I think we should go to 0.22 ASAP and get companies to build th= eir new features on trunk against that. >>=20 >=20 > Waiting on 0.22 and its adoption is not going to work for HBase. The > HBase project would be long dead if waiting on 0.22 were the only > option available to us. In fact we'd be dead already if it wasn't for > the lifeline thrown us by the folks who hooked us up with > branch-0.20-append. >=20 > St.Ack From general-return-2586-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 07:08:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29438 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 07:08:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 07:08:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 15098 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 07:08:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15024 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 07:08:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 07:08:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:08:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.126] (HELO homiemail-a65.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.126) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:08:19 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a65.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a65.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301B07E406F for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=vS3z1kMwY4RlRC0JERFvEuI9eQyCU3Lp4nqMWPlz3j8WtvjEe2fk 7IQXteDO2/2NauW5/hOggjc7AlYXIEfH8ot02R4us4T+Ggf4EbTUPf3r72Ye4F98 E4F/BGHWW06Dfu0dV9GsJbL8aiLxEKqIsUATXABS0nxyYxw4snGzijo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=3YoFaZ65ZHMtd9n2gIrzdCzd2Lg=; b=O9D9xJG84mXcaactzHw29xdt0rWb y3txUqJvzRiPNO/vVfQTY7yy/HPXlYyPTIzhRhtxpegRlEYZ/KBlLZTpL/iYCCtP hp+eq7oUHg1MmujbOvFBtRootKLR8mIGQf7WQDXp0adDDaW18F1drY9YkMiYP3ae vCNBnPuUSStz6O0= Received: from [192.168.1.66] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a65.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0DE3D7E4065 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:07:58 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > In that case, I'm +1 on releasing a 20+append branch, but am nervous = on how much effort will be put into testing it. But this option is = better than the current apache alternative out there as you and Owen = mentioned.=20 Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug found then we would have to release a new version of the append version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. If someone builds the source package and there are enough votes to release it, then the version number is one of 0.22.0 (assuming trunk hasn't been released yet), 0.23.0 (if 0.22.x is already published), or 1.0.0. That is, unless the PMC decides to make it a separate product, in which case it would be hadoopend-0.20.0 (or something like that) and will either die a slow and painful death or someone else will pick it up and fork the project. ....Roy From general-return-2587-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 08:01:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40384 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 08:01:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 08:01:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 58556 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 08:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58239 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 08:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58226 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 08:00:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:00:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 40279 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 08:00:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:00:33 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6235305bwz.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr2967687bki.85.1293091230961; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.76.14 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b5ae7bd0ac04980f4392 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b5ae7bd0ac04980f4392 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug > found then we would have to release a new version of the append > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. > Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag, but the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 and 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed in the append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a way to bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string like 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering and suggest a version jump. If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append branch, which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.20 branch. -- Owen --001636c5b5ae7bd0ac04980f4392-- From general-return-2588-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 10:53:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 877 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 10:53:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 10:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 18284 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 10:53:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18092 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 10:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18080 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 10:53:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:53:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bjoern@schiessle.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [78.46.69.5] (HELO zucker.schokokeks.org) (78.46.69.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:53:34 +0000 Received: from pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [::ffff:129.69.216.55]) (AUTH: LOGIN schiesbn@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by zucker.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:53:11 +0100 id 0000000000018010.000000004D132A17.00007FD1 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:50:04 +0100 From: Bjoern Schiessle To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot Message-ID: <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0800 li ping wrote: > It seems the exception occurs during NameNode loads the editlog. > make sure the editlog file exists. or you can debug the application to > see what's wrong. last night I tried to fix the problem and did a big mistake. Instead of copying /var/lib/hadoop-0.20/cache/hadoop/dfs/name/current/edits and edits.new to a backup I moved them and later delete the only version hence I thought I have a copy. The good thing: The namenode starts again. The bad thing: My file system is now in an inconsistent state. Probably the only solution is to reformat the hdfs and start from scratch. Thankfully there wasn't that much data stored at the hdfs until now but I definitely have to make sure that this doesn't happens again: 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another computer (mounted by sshfs) 2. I will install a backup script similar to: http://blog.milford.io/2010/10/simple-hadoop-namenode-backup-script Do you think this should be enough to overcome such situations in the future? Any additional ideas how to make it more safe? I'm still a little bit afraid if I think about the next time I will have to reboot the server. Shouldn't a reboot safely stop and restart all Hadoop services? Is there any thing I can do to make sure that the next reboot will not cause the same problems? Thanks a lot! Bj=F6rn From general-return-2589-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 12:46:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47745 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 12:46:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 12:46:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 97759 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 12:46:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97618 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 12:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97610 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 12:46:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:46:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of li.j2ee@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:46:09 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6433695bwz.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:45:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RV7+mxD4rTwposdnJWoNBoIhaXbdJLkdh+m7TMHp96M=; b=HbrzkcY6pICvWjPSW2qDluR8KjvcKNZ4xhm9KzaIzH4V+3zkgGAEsnnKQyt3YShEuF l4rrdnphu4mDtg57xo2iJL831kTb6tUbiVk+YQ3aLq9Zk3LWzTSrvP4aXvTGUKBba2PT A8qcgSDE518iLpBZfQBctivTadUW8G9E6ED28= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dLE06yiXNUtNyHgczq0EFu4jTMZkYl0GWVN/TxZN4kSjkaxZqD2cXLV/awT4o/VW9c WxRAsEWMcPcg5SFJr3aKO3ZPVpUCYSjiETEKOorwd3+kwmQ9auyY/bilU37ZfLSBU/o1 N8XdYZZz1Me8vBvLM7tulDupQ6rFuIODsGZAs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.99.145 with SMTP id u17mr7078505bkn.1.1293108347647; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:45:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.138.67 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:45:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:45:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot From: li ping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636457ce4b7b9100498133f2e --001636457ce4b7b9100498133f2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As far as I know, setup a backup namenode dir is enough. I haven't use the hadoop in a production environment. So, I can't tell you what would be right way to reboot the server. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Bjoern Schiessle wro= te: > Hi, > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0800 li ping wrote: > > It seems the exception occurs during NameNode loads the editlog. > > make sure the editlog file exists. or you can debug the application to > > see what's wrong. > > last night I tried to fix the problem and did a big mistake. Instead of > copying /var/lib/hadoop-0.20/cache/hadoop/dfs/name/current/edits and > edits.new to a backup I moved them and later delete the only version > hence I thought I have a copy. > > The good thing: The namenode starts again. > The bad thing: My file system is now in an inconsistent state. > > Probably the only solution is to reformat the hdfs and start from > scratch. Thankfully there wasn't that much data stored at the hdfs until > now but I definitely have to make sure that this doesn't happens again: > > 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > computer (mounted by sshfs) > 2. I will install a backup script similar to: > http://blog.milford.io/2010/10/simple-hadoop-namenode-backup-script > > Do you think this should be enough to overcome such situations in the > future? Any additional ideas how to make it more safe? > > I'm still a little bit afraid if I think about the next time I will have > to reboot the server. Shouldn't a reboot safely stop and restart all > Hadoop services? Is there any thing I can do to make sure that the next > reboot will not cause the same problems? > > Thanks a lot! > Bj=C3=B6rn > > > --=20 -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 --001636457ce4b7b9100498133f2e-- From general-return-2590-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 15:29:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43018 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 15:29:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 15:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 57390 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 15:29:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57138 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 15:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57130 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 15:29:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:29:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of patodirahul@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:29:41 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so6547561wye.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:29:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pKBotC9L9+dtzrXItTYgcyTDEyMgv0V7kratpnOlKvk=; b=d2XDqWnLvOEpVY96A974l04IomFWjQj+jLeio6T9u+z7FcOvj/u8SE9+5vGRFXDaVF ui6J4uvrCDr86a1gF2b4lTscQ5LrFuNdBmUVWhgwMsV7e6JSouLpoLiLGTJl1Upfgl0V bbwl89SL4Jz4imxNXGd/W0KpTDB1A0FeaPGD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BerdVfXysBQgFexK5SR7vgJZluDmdUPpKrZsfvwtIM21HF4VBjfHWWy0qZhiydBZlU iKKpudypvjzK2ITe4C2boMBtOhU7QIMvWViunjwZg5gLYHZVKUuc9eMfV3ZOrtuGtGca +Ugp9jArAgMMKFR+/Pc78u24p94j/cJ/6lue8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.68.4 with SMTP id k4mr8953240wed.63.1293118159926; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.16.131 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:29:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:59:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot From: rahul patodi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0b8fa9339fb04981588e7 --000e0ce0b8fa9339fb04981588e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, If you want to reboot the server: 1. stop mapred 2. stop dfs the reboot when you again want to restart hadoop firstly start dfs then mepred. --=20 *Regards*, Rahul Patodi Software Engineer, Impetus Infotech (India) Pvt Ltd, www.impetus.com Mob:09907074413 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:15 PM, li ping wrote: > As far as I know, setup a backup namenode dir is enough. > > I haven't use the hadoop in a production environment. So, I can't tell yo= u > what would be right way to reboot the server. > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Bjoern Schiessle >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0800 li ping wrote: > > > It seems the exception occurs during NameNode loads the editlog. > > > make sure the editlog file exists. or you can debug the application t= o > > > see what's wrong. > > > > last night I tried to fix the problem and did a big mistake. Instead of > > copying /var/lib/hadoop-0.20/cache/hadoop/dfs/name/current/edits and > > edits.new to a backup I moved them and later delete the only version > > hence I thought I have a copy. > > > > The good thing: The namenode starts again. > > The bad thing: My file system is now in an inconsistent state. > > > > Probably the only solution is to reformat the hdfs and start from > > scratch. Thankfully there wasn't that much data stored at the hdfs unti= l > > now but I definitely have to make sure that this doesn't happens again: > > > > 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > > computer (mounted by sshfs) > > 2. I will install a backup script similar to: > > http://blog.milford.io/2010/10/simple-hadoop-namenode-backup-script > > > > Do you think this should be enough to overcome such situations in the > > future? Any additional ideas how to make it more safe? > > > > I'm still a little bit afraid if I think about the next time I will hav= e > > to reboot the server. Shouldn't a reboot safely stop and restart all > > Hadoop services? Is there any thing I can do to make sure that the next > > reboot will not cause the same problems? > > > > Thanks a lot! > > Bj=C3=B6rn > > > > > > > > > -- > -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 > --000e0ce0b8fa9339fb04981588e7-- From general-return-2591-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 17:16:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19205 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 17:16:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 17:16:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 86615 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86509 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86501 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 17:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:16:24 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so6501281qyk.14 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.133 with SMTP id is5mr7285164qcb.280.1293124561856; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:16:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.17 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:15:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:15:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630f20928e97d0498170632 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163630f20928e97d0498170632 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All this aside, you really shouldn't have to "safely" stop all the Hadoop services when you reboot any of your servers. Hadoop should be able to survive a crash of any of the daemons. Any circumstance in which Hadoop currently corrupts the edits log or fsimage is a serious bug, and should be reported via JIRA. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:29 AM, rahul patodi wrote= : > Hi, > If you want to reboot the server: > 1. stop mapred > 2. stop dfs > the reboot > when you again want to restart hadoop > firstly start dfs then mepred. > > -- > *Regards*, > Rahul Patodi > Software Engineer, > Impetus Infotech (India) Pvt Ltd, > www.impetus.com > Mob:09907074413 > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:15 PM, li ping wrote: > > > As far as I know, setup a backup namenode dir is enough. > > > > I haven't use the hadoop in a production environment. So, I can't tell > you > > what would be right way to reboot the server. > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Bjoern Schiessle > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:17 +0800 li ping wrote: > > > > It seems the exception occurs during NameNode loads the editlog. > > > > make sure the editlog file exists. or you can debug the application > to > > > > see what's wrong. > > > > > > last night I tried to fix the problem and did a big mistake. Instead = of > > > copying /var/lib/hadoop-0.20/cache/hadoop/dfs/name/current/edits and > > > edits.new to a backup I moved them and later delete the only version > > > hence I thought I have a copy. > > > > > > The good thing: The namenode starts again. > > > The bad thing: My file system is now in an inconsistent state. > > > > > > Probably the only solution is to reformat the hdfs and start from > > > scratch. Thankfully there wasn't that much data stored at the hdfs > until > > > now but I definitely have to make sure that this doesn't happens agai= n: > > > > > > 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > > > computer (mounted by sshfs) > > > 2. I will install a backup script similar to: > > > http://blog.milford.io/2010/10/simple-hadoop-namenode-backup-script > > > > > > Do you think this should be enough to overcome such situations in the > > > future? Any additional ideas how to make it more safe? > > > > > > I'm still a little bit afraid if I think about the next time I will > have > > > to reboot the server. Shouldn't a reboot safely stop and restart all > > > Hadoop services? Is there any thing I can do to make sure that the ne= xt > > > reboot will not cause the same problems? > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > Bj=C3=B6rn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 > > > --00163630f20928e97d0498170632-- From general-return-2592-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 17:27:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22416 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 17:27:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 17:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 97631 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:27:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97591 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97583 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:27:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:27:36 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so6335036fxm.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:27:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=O6J9VtLS7yzra/OilAAEloxAY6KI8fvlr0vGY/T1yJA=; b=hiAa6mYqMYaMFFUbNQFqOJmRpnw3kNujieodHi/MU5BIR18uIB97fq1opSIOwvh7q+ NOXL9s2UMbu+c68ZP+mXEi2LkMdFkX/OWGc3ifTyvbV7kpEhedgvIlq5BYUBQKi+/zJl gxpsvsL8KsWrbKgOu9pP3Dsnx7gMmKgDB2hrY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LfmkXer5lVdaOe3L4OUVMevWPN6VqAJ5qfbQCtxGL/ltZsVdx60XhAC+rQj+X3uISF O039bDxwlZBAKUx9RATEaRVlguptytIg3TIT1yKlbEh4VJngYnA4B3agJi9FMBwjoI3s YoLojP+mBSnK01UbiSaX1SoDHCnu+glj6yMcI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.198 with SMTP id i6mr1285645fan.10.1293125234907; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:27:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:27:14 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9VpLeav-Md8HRdFsYnezAuOeFh0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append branch, > which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.20 > branch. > That is indeed the case Owen. St.Ack From general-return-2593-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 17:33:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26878 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 17:33:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 17:33:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8868 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:33:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8728 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:33:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8720 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 17:33:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:33:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mcsrivas@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:33:29 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so7238800qyk.14 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:33:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qzMFRUosJeEoHGphnbIab9KVKPP5P0/OT5okoOceZIM=; b=BkgT0Ty3oRAm2NPbT8AM7a61EuCJkYbBrMGc0cF6RhHN0cFAJQjBNPebz2fQW1yhrC InwDYTtMT5aPSG1d478asO0WWwAFtieLxyRVkg4f1ZcbG+fsaR2F4rNnjC9UITTGtvZu +c0BFR9kOzMB/4TrAPAuyXzRM9oJXkbXpPCX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=diDWkDanokl1b33NVo9XY56kiQ8avxMkvGqpRSTN8YlP4cbDhNcbWALZMT/sbf1U/m GC3bZhebaSZyR8WIRpAzcH3BTM0FhalMoOxk7E7Lf7Q+SX0JLYcUrLi9TkmhYKRUgHvf QdjlKP9FrETw0bhue44gbFOKw4Y/h5jkHCCjU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.141 with SMTP id x13mr8099233qad.76.1293125589074; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:33:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.87.20 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:33:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:33:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: "M. C. Srivas" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cddbe6303c40498174363 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cddbe6303c40498174363 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] There are two append solutions floating around, and they are incompatible with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain incompatible with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, 0.23, 0.20.3, e.t.c.) Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to "use HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoop into two. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding > wrote: > > > Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug > > found then we would have to release a new version of the append > > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. > > > > Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag, but > the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 and > 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed in > the > append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. > > If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a way > to > bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string like > 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering and > suggest a version jump. > > If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append branch, > which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.20 > branch. > > -- Owen > --0015175cddbe6303c40498174363-- From general-return-2594-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 17:39:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28458 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 17:39:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 17:39:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19499 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19272 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 17:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19263 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 17:39:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:39:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:38:57 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6145943iyb.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JJJaIreut9JqTr5AlCX9cay7izu+9zAKfFHp7/3e36s=; b=tiQVRDtGiwX9fvQBHf5qQMDHGKqGHw6TBnY8lL7ma3XWylw4spMZ3Bnb5nVFlMj+PJ aw6Qh1MQ19wUjHq4OEesTlkfqltJCltxRS+A2zmKWP9XzKucIoodHSvzx6oGiq2Tx0u2 H83+OX0HQ3EIQNGBRhGtardoqelIYgFRn6yKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sceWFbnarh68+OhzSGUJLd+8DI4zsnXikULUlq/RcyX5TaBJDJgLhkunZrO6qjLnDS Dp65PDkDop7jZ+2fyf9Q9ttqQUVQUWJCrp/i6mJYPtoppiq2P7jB60jbzaF9tDbArufK boGZBdT97FRlLmLRPJsFF34E+dm5uxyoOliP4= Received: by 10.231.14.74 with SMTP id f10mr8437120iba.119.1293125916178; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:38:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:38:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. I believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us closer to that goal. I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has placed HBase into. However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's stop digging this hole. -jakob On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] > > There are two append solutions floating around, and they are incompatible > with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain incompatibl= e > with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, =A00.23, =A00= .20.3, > e.t.c.) > > Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to =A0"use > HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoop i= nto > two. > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: > >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding >> wrote: >> >> > Features are not release version tags. =A0If there is a security bug >> > found then we would have to release a new version of the append >> > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. >> > >> >> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag, = but >> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 an= d >> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed in >> the >> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. >> >> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a wa= y >> to >> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string l= ike >> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering and >> suggest a version jump. >> >> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append bran= ch, >> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.20 >> branch. >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-2595-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 18:16:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46357 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 18:16:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 18:16:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 64442 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 18:16:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64269 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 18:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64261 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 18:16:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:16:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcsrivas@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:15:59 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so6704677qwh.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:15:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yvC4UyM80c2HltvjtGXWGIruqXWJYH3jNZz8VG3IS+o=; b=kLQo5gr3k8UGOT8muGqDMDvadykgsSFvj7qa5a+nICx4F3ostjrYv48ejeJalAG2pq TvHn9rabRhnSBid+fPFWKRAQZVbpt5BXLXwhriwWRsdk72pnbmjVLAwS8aCUXt7KJ6JO lJKPol6zemNc2nQmqC48/FGjFWhqH64eioZ8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kuYCWcsh3rmH2MjtwcGqRxpG0u7lhOesEMvyp60FDhC946IPPFIYBHGMhj1tFrUNsV WjE171WuyF8hYXf/x93RO6+jgZp2KEzdTKU7Td64r0X0lDDL/IRcIuMNwVYULOvves2p NtcMHIvvqvvuPQ0KS0VMuPfnhLl+6FqnleJcg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.6.141 with SMTP id 13mr8136548qaz.26.1293128138269; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.87.20 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:15:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:15:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: "M. C. Srivas" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb71a54a5a5049817dbb6 --0015175cb71a54a5a5049817dbb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be > spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and > continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. I > believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 > (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). > Regardless, there will still be 2 incompatible "branches". And that is only the beginning. Some future features will be done only on branch 1 (since company 1 uses that), and other features on branch 2 (by company 2, since they prefer branch 2), thereby further separating the two branches. If the goal is to avoid the split, then there are only 2 choices: (a) merge both (b) abandon one or the other. Which one is one willing to stomach? > > The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of > new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria > discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation > where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void > such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us > closer to that goal. > > I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has > placed HBase into. However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to > help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's stop digging this hole. -jakob > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > > [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] > > > > There are two append solutions floating around, and they are incompatible > > with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain > incompatible > > with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, 0.23, > 0.20.3, > > e.t.c.) > > > > Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to "use > > HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoop > into > > two. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug > >> > found then we would have to release a new version of the append > >> > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. > >> > > >> > >> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag, > but > >> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 > and > >> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed in > >> the > >> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. > >> > >> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a > way > >> to > >> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string > like > >> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering and > >> suggest a version jump. > >> > >> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append > branch, > >> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.20 > >> branch. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > > > --0015175cb71a54a5a5049817dbb6-- From general-return-2596-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 19:40:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77900 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 19:40:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 19:40:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 57330 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 19:40:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57290 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 19:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57279 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 19:40:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:40:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:40:35 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6248420iyb.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:40:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zOheWhwMJSMzOwUbmfS63Mbvr2yid4OtKiaodsAiXzQ=; b=hXx/dP22DbdTf3vW/u+wbesliCHcXpO2qzrJIxZCMhP0EWoFK2QIv44zUtcEnpES9j Z+rK80sQHUzIBXJj27DWMn4lh4cMMAbWNRrsoEPGyq4OLhlO1yRACuGQdHqW+NW2jPIs 70Dbs7xC3Uq0rVAhGZ//lAFfRj1KUXXWZeZzg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lDo/u54rota1v4YiXsdAygn68bLHXZPWz2RrKzflApzRdeY5tEF3E2IlwFZO2tqjK/ t+NE2c4SOMPMLTpqJFmu71jtrhGcSqAWTHUlw9NTmyUR+RSo9Opxi0qPM7+FbpCKqhjw 6PgHeg52Vg9VVe5Mc33YuvPFRHdV6eRiCsxEo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.66 with SMTP id fx2mr8460685ibb.108.1293133214465; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.38.3 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:40:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:40:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring to was supposed to be out 13-15 months ago. Pardon if I look for solutions that deploy 4 months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly helping HDFS either. -ryan On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be > spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and > continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. =A0I > believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 > (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). > > The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of > new versions of Apache Hadoop. =A0Missing out any one of those criteria > discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation > where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void > such a release should. =A0The effort to maintain this offical branch and > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us > closer to that goal. > > I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has > placed HBase into. =A0However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to > help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. =A0Let's stop digging this hole. > -jakob > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: >> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] >> >> There are two append solutions floating around, and they are incompatibl= e >> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain incompatib= le >> with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, =A00.23, =A0= 0.20.3, >> e.t.c.) >> >> Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to =A0"use >> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoop = into >> two. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wro= te: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Features are not release version tags. =A0If there is a security bug >>> > found then we would have to release a new version of the append >>> > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. >>> > >>> >>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag,= but >>> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 a= nd >>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed i= n >>> the >>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. >>> >>> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a w= ay >>> to >>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string = like >>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering an= d >>> suggest a version jump. >>> >>> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append bra= nch, >>> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the 0.2= 0 >>> branch. >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >> > From general-return-2597-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 20:01:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81425 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 20:01:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 20:01:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 75072 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:01:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75028 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75020 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 20:01:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:01:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:01:28 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7408596iwn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.144.21 with SMTP id x21mr8478181ibu.30.1293134465546; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:01:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.102 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:00:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:00:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64761da7738690498195418 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64761da7738690498195418 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:15 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > Regardless, there will still be 2 incompatible "branches". And that is only > the beginning. > > Some future features will be done only on branch 1 (since company 1 uses > that), and other features on branch 2 (by company 2, since they prefer > branch 2), thereby further separating the two branches. > > If the goal is to avoid the split, then there are only 2 choices: > (a) merge both > (b) abandon one or the other. > > The 0.20 append solution has never been seen as a fork. It's a stop-gap fixup of the 0.20 append feature, but we don't intend to forward-port that append implementation into trunk. From an API perspective it's very close to the 0.22 version, and I think everyone fully intends to abandon the 0.20-append work once 0.22 append has been heavily tested for HBase workloads. > > > > > The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, > > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of > > new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria > > discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation > > where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void > > such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and > > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us > > closer to that goal. > > > +1. Interestingly, the work on 0.20-append uncovered a number of bugs that also will apply to 0.22's implementation. So it wasn't all a wasted effort ;-) -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e64761da7738690498195418-- From general-return-2598-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 20:03:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81807 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 20:03:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 20:03:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 78203 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78108 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78100 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 20:03:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:03:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:03:33 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6265879iyb.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:03:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.33.202 with SMTP id i10mr8430354ibd.55.1293134592481; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:03:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.102 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:02:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:02:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215048dc7081c9a0498195cb3 --002215048dc7081c9a0498195cb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Bjoern Schiessle wrote: > > 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > computer (mounted by sshfs) > I would strongly discourage the use of sshfs for the name dir. For one, it's slow, and for two, I've sen it have some really weird semantics where it's doing write-back caching. Just take a look at its manpage and you should get scared about using it for a critical mount point like this. A soft interruptable NFS mount is a much safer bet. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --002215048dc7081c9a0498195cb3-- From general-return-2599-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 20:48:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96775 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 20:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 20:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 21061 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20982 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 20:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20974 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 20:48:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:48:17 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so322769ewy.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:47:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=7HSVmee+ZY0YkaXp8No5Qstmr7HWaawz6TYDVjIfu5o=; b=DaXu7wnO3+yQaeSlsPHtqUd5JrqViZGPOMC0WPjSQqJAn6YfOWG9FT0x2m+2NojBZm p2tN570DPbqIc5K4BUP+65C9mCvn7qWzS0oIRBmS6Dwab9pGAxC7O57Lf8qdW9ZgMAnd 3fuqHmWwEr27xrLvCgoyKgYzbyZdP4Bxomoxo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=ku0QwiHFKm25XH1HchWLOKMTUyO/D7WY17TaFHlDUa1Z3axF1Qf+AVLWLQNTNHtC2g tn3Z/DWrvX0qDTOuXcJieGTZ5MSFjow5BFKUbHn5WXd6Xcprt/o9vt3KxgjJYISppPVH RrcS9WZpEH8QnMMye3wMAqoZYtG0TS5G6pqkY= Received: by 10.213.15.11 with SMTP id i11mr6973816eba.98.1293137277648; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:47:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.26.15 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:47:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> From: Jakob Homan Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:47:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please move discussions of CDH issues to Cloudera's lists. Thanks. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Bjoern Schiessle wrote: > >> >> 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another >> computer (mounted by sshfs) >> > > I would strongly discourage the use of sshfs for the name dir. For one, it's > slow, and for two, I've sen it have some really weird semantics where it's > doing write-back caching. > > Just take a look at its manpage and you should get scared about using it for > a critical mount point like this. > > A soft interruptable NFS mount is a much safer bet. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-2600-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 21:08:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9314 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 21:08:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 21:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 39569 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 21:08:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39489 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 21:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39481 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 21:08:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:08:47 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6313911iyb.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.77 with SMTP id er13mr4083278ibb.105.1293138506868; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:08:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.102 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:08:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:08:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba47682b58e8bc04981a4502 --90e6ba47682b58e8bc04981a4502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > Please move discussions of CDH issues to Cloudera's lists. Thanks. > Hi Jakob, These bugs are clearly not CDH-specific. NameNode corruption bugs, and best practices with regard to the storage of NN metadata, are clearly applicable to any version of Hadoop that users may run, be it Apache, Yahoo, Facebook, 0.20, 0.21, or trunk. If you have reason to believe my suggestion you quoted below is somehow not relevant to the larger community I would love to hear it. My understanding of the ASF goals is that we should encourage a cohesive community. Asking users of CDH to move general Hadoop questions off of ASF mailing lists just because of their choice in distros encourages a fractured community rather than a cohesive one. Clearly. if a user has a question specifically about Cloudera packaging they should be directed to the CDH lists so as not to clutter non-CDH users' inboxes with irrelevant questions. I think if you browse the archives you'll find that Cloudera employees have been consistent about doing this since we started the cdh-user list several months ago. But if an issue is a bug that is likely to occur in trunk, it makes sense to me to leave it on the list associated with the core project. Personally I do my best to answer questions on the ASF lists regardless of which distro the person is using - though our distros have some divergence in backported patch sets, it's rare that a bug in one distro doesn't allow us to fix a bug in trunk. I can readily pull up several recent examples of this, and I'm surprised that there isn't more concern in the general community about bugs that may result in NN metadata corruption. Thanks, -Todd > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Bjoern Schiessle >wrote: > > > >> > >> 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > >> computer (mounted by sshfs) > >> > > > > I would strongly discourage the use of sshfs for the name dir. For one, > it's > > slow, and for two, I've sen it have some really weird semantics where > it's > > doing write-back caching. > > > > Just take a look at its manpage and you should get scared about using it > for > > a critical mount point like this. > > > > A soft interruptable NFS mount is a much safer bet. > > > > -Todd > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba47682b58e8bc04981a4502-- From general-return-2601-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 22:05:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29646 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 22:05:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 22:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87505 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:05:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87297 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:05:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87289 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 22:05:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:05:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bjoern@schiessle.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [78.46.69.5] (HELO zucker.schokokeks.org) (78.46.69.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:05:05 +0000 Received: from woody.localdomain (HSI-KBW-095-208-083-064.hsi5.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [::ffff:95.208.83.64]) (AUTH: PLAIN schiesbn@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zucker.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:04:43 +0100 id 0000000000018019.000000004D13C77B.00001EE5 Received: from woody (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woody.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E487DDD; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:05:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:05:05 +0100 From: Bjoern Schiessle To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot Message-ID: <20101223230505.1f4105f3@woody> In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:15:41 -0800 Aaron T. Myers wrote: > All this aside, you really shouldn't have to "safely" stop all the > Hadoop services when you reboot any of your servers. Hadoop should be > able to survive a crash of any of the daemons. Any circumstance in > which Hadoop currently corrupts the edits log or fsimage is a serious > bug, and should be reported via JIRA. this is also what I would expect. Nevertheless the last reboot caused the problem described at the beginning of the thread. During the tests today I always stopped the Datanode and Namenode by my own which works flawlessly. To be a little bit more safe I wrote my own stop-script which stops the datanode and the namenode before shutdown. best wishes, Bj=C3=B6rn From general-return-2602-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 22:06:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31413 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 22:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 22:06:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 89444 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89401 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89393 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 22:06:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bjoern@schiessle.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [78.46.69.5] (HELO zucker.schokokeks.org) (78.46.69.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:06:18 +0000 Received: from woody.localdomain (HSI-KBW-095-208-083-064.hsi5.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [::ffff:95.208.83.64]) (AUTH: PLAIN schiesbn@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zucker.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:05:57 +0100 id 000000000001802A.000000004D13C7C5.00002047 Received: from woody (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woody.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDA687DDD; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:06:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:06:20 +0100 From: Bjoern Schiessle To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot Message-ID: <20101223230620.6aa117d3@woody> In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:02:51 -0800 Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Bjoern Schiessle > wrote: >=20 > > > > 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another > > computer (mounted by sshfs) > > >=20 > I would strongly discourage the use of sshfs for the name dir. For one, > it's slow, and for two, I've sen it have some really weird semantics > where it's doing write-back caching. Thanks for this insights. I now switched to NFS. Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn From general-return-2603-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 22:19:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33984 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 22:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 22:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1028 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:18:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 758 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:18:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 749 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 22:18:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:18:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:18:54 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so3369386yxm.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:18:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=I7F4rgIFKt5pfDmfqDzlGHhNG57ftYXH85/61BXmczE=; b=dBjBp/+AHefy4SD9+mIkjAvbAw+RtsuCmuXnbkKhWSQRydwxl/FKdgDLl6bSBe2+P+ 9cc9QHmHtf25WSFH8q1IGYmMVszJKU+dCRiCyioTakAFTu4hr1B9MYJKBkdMc4MfGhda Phv+plSACWZKIkyKFMLrP50W3QmYWrM0CZHQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pKeI50rTpvo4CLcg1TdV5ktSaZQTeBgZdwpd7cUAvaLT1vzo4686gSg0dQhNbivVkP HqkotDmQ2nTGeWY8OVH7zZUx/P+oHF82lw6xgQ6rlD6rSV6AlZJ+p6ZwspWar/pY73CP BcJSFIH/kmVRagiYmFWTu0UjpEjQHdlQXUh4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.44 with SMTP id e32mr6761101yhg.37.1293142713244; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:18:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.15 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:18:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:18:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8c01111adc04981b4006 --0023547c8c01111adc04981b4006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I also think building 0.20-append will be a major distraction from moving 0.22 forward with all the great new features, including the new append implementation, sitting on the bench because we are delaying the release. It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to focus on 0.22 rather than chasing both birds. I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale testing as was the case with 0.21. I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale resources, as I can grasp, into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of course. This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months rather than "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even faster/better if others could join the effort. I see > 100 companies claiming they are powered by Apache Hadoop. I also hope with this effort HBase will be able to start moving to the new append implementation in the next 2-3 months, which in turn will help 0.22 HDFS rather than divert resources from it as it would have be with 0.20-append. Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival? One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in control of external releases and distributions, but we should not fork our own releases by introducing competing apis. If we can keep the dev line relatively straight the external releases will follow. Thanks, --Konstantin On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring to was supposed to > be out 13-15 months ago. Pardon if I look for solutions that deploy 4 > months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). > > Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly helping HDFS either. > > -ryan > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be > > spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and > > continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. I > > believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 > > (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). > > > > The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, > > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of > > new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria > > discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation > > where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void > > such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and > > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us > > closer to that goal. > > > > I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has > > placed HBase into. However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to > > help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, > > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify > > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's stop digging this hole. > > -jakob > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas > wrote: > >> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] > >> > >> There are two append solutions floating around, and they are > incompatible > >> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain > incompatible > >> with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, 0.23, > 0.20.3, > >> e.t.c.) > >> > >> Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to "use > >> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoop > into > >> two. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug > >>> > found then we would have to release a new version of the append > >>> > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. > >>> > > >>> > >>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second tag, > but > >>> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20 > and > >>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed > in > >>> the > >>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. > >>> > >>> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a > way > >>> to > >>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version string > like > >>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering > and > >>> suggest a version jump. > >>> > >>> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append > branch, > >>> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the > 0.20 > >>> branch. > >>> > >>> -- Owen > >>> > >> > > > --0023547c8c01111adc04981b4006-- From general-return-2604-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 22:39:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38353 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 22:39:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 22:39:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17376 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:39:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17329 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:39:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17321 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 22:39:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:39:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:39:28 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7524948iwn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4hou5W2I6qjMWb2nLtNqeTUaggvgFNRboKoxRHWzWi0=; b=dwKQVW2cAsKsMVkXigzvcYjfFbl6AcX0Z5ko7ApCGU2CDUMzOSLzKjYYwqvVJWelZD QpAn8uKq+19FJ4iVmN6cLSD933V4AswA+VF+d30VGbenAs8F9dylMDr1yx6pfnGEjzfi TKEjVJppnJmJbR8oS2ZxWNsXLi5MjrFagBhfk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R6racP4QUSAaISYHMJ0k/bXq47cdl68WbR+cS7dXmEP3F7cwgCY3U87XMEGRQ/tgF7 5GU6xT5ekt+JrrNPIY9U27mQwLnIITaaj0QyrjQ4dRJsljwpnNB5mIjhObvRhz/eAZoA iv8qgBGmsYmMWmjkCnbry9kGVMsmxe98EpI1k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.38.6 with SMTP id z6mr8739406ibd.8.1293143947338; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.38.3 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:39:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How does stack volunteering his time to release an existing branch divert resources? Without an ASF release of 0.20-append I will keep having to recommend an external vendor's release of Hadoop. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I also think building 0.20-append will be a major distraction from moving > 0.22 forward with all the great new features, including the new append > implementation, sitting on the bench because we are delaying the release. > It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to focus on 0.22 rathe= r > than chasing both birds. > > I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale testing as was the case > with 0.21. > I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale resources, as I can gras= p, > into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of course. > This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months rather than > "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even faster/better if others > could join the effort. I see > 100 companies claiming they are powered by > Apache Hadoop. > > I also hope with this effort HBase will be able to start moving to the ne= w > append implementation in the next 2-3 months, which in turn will help 0.2= 2 > HDFS > rather than divert resources from it as it would have be with 0.20-append= . > > Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival? > > One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in control of external > releases and distributions, but we should not fork our own releases by > introducing > competing apis. If we can keep the dev line relatively straight the exter= nal > releases > will follow. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > >> The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring to was supposed to >> be out 13-15 months ago. =A0Pardon if I look for solutions that deploy 4 >> months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). >> >> Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly helping HDFS either. >> >> -ryan >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> > It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be >> > spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and >> > continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. =A0I >> > believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 >> > (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). >> > >> > The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, >> > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of >> > new versions of Apache Hadoop. =A0Missing out any one of those criteri= a >> > discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation >> > where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void >> > such a release should. =A0The effort to maintain this offical branch a= nd >> > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us >> > closer to that goal. >> > >> > I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has >> > placed HBase into. =A0However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to >> > help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, >> > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify >> > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. =A0Let's stop digging this hole. >> > -jakob >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas >> wrote: >> >> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] >> >> >> >> There are two append solutions floating around, and they are >> incompatible >> >> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain >> incompatible >> >> with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, =A00.23, >> =A00.20.3, >> >> e.t.c.) >> >> >> >> Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to =A0"= use >> >> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hado= op >> into >> >> two. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Features are not release version tags. =A0If there is a security b= ug >> >>> > found then we would have to release a new version of the append >> >>> > version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second t= ag, >> but >> >>> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.2= 0 >> and >> >>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixe= d >> in >> >>> the >> >>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. >> >>> >> >>> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves = a >> way >> >>> to >> >>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version stri= ng >> like >> >>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering >> and >> >>> suggest a version jump. >> >>> >> >>> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append >> branch, >> >>> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the >> 0.20 >> >>> branch. >> >>> >> >>> -- Owen >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > From general-return-2605-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 22:46:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39618 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 22:46:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 22:46:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 25899 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:46:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25802 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 22:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25794 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 22:46:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:46:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:46:52 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7529692iwn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:46:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nfgsvZVEwCnxYs/nOS0+wUg/HY4sbxCb8M7apb/99Ac=; b=Ci/sMICy7iHrNHUxrm9nIBc++5X/BQnb66KnLHM5l0TjSIJ4rEtsQYKS+CY5B47QU0 a09PAYHv9QKBT6XtH313KOdiw/MIH/LrCo+9rOrb0lNpgrPwSLnuov6UCaXgBaz6TTw2 8Hgy59WnFY7TwTjf+4VTkm3pwv4nCQpeq97Uk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qEJQJqIJc6RquELUa1/SiXLZIZ4Sl4J2m8U6h/HulRrMGZ57y2rFZEe+FnOyJIb1VL sc9IxE37HsZkBdSM1scEZLNrW0zSv9IAQj2I7kBDYhG+GZByhZQy+dwdms1Kl5+LpEo1 H+7WNEWFVYKItU3LkE0Vh0BnQ7WKT2B9ViZFc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.205 with SMTP id n13mr484494iby.58.1293144392115; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.38.3 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:46:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101222160311.7ffb9b6d@laptop> <20101223115004.7f8dc48c@pcmoholynagy.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:46:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: namenode doesn't start after reboot From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the bug might be related to this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-686 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1002 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > Please move discussions of CDH issues to Cloudera's lists. =A0Thanks. > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Bjoern Schiessle = wrote: >> >>> >>> 1. I have set up a second dfs.name.dir which is stored at another >>> computer (mounted by sshfs) >>> >> >> I would strongly discourage the use of sshfs for the name dir. For one, = it's >> slow, and for two, I've sen it have some really weird semantics where it= 's >> doing write-back caching. >> >> Just take a look at its manpage and you should get scared about using it= for >> a critical mount point like this. >> >> A soft interruptable NFS mount is a much safer bet. >> >> -Todd >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > From general-return-2606-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 23:34:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56052 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 23:34:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 23:34:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 54043 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 23:34:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53999 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 23:34:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53991 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 23:34:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:34:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:34:11 +0000 Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so1414576pxi.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.50.3 with SMTP id x3mr6944022wfx.120.1293147230466; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [49.194.41.124] ([49.194.41.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p8sm11387953wff.16.2010.12.23.15.33.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:33:49 -0800 (PST) References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:33:33 +1100 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" The release is one issue, but ongoing maintenance of it is another, which is= the point roy raised.=20 It's a concern if we have a security issue, and who will patch it (and test i= t) going forward.=20 --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangel= o On 24/12/2010, at 9:39 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > How does stack volunteering his time to release an existing branch > divert resources? >=20 > Without an ASF release of 0.20-append I will keep having to recommend > an external vendor's release of Hadoop. >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: >> I also think building 0.20-append will be a major distraction from moving= >> 0.22 forward with all the great new features, including the new append >> implementation, sitting on the bench because we are delaying the release.= >> It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to focus on 0.22 rathe= r >> than chasing both birds. >>=20 >> I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale testing as was the case >> with 0.21. >> I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale resources, as I can gras= p, >> into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of course. >> This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months rather than >> "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even faster/better if others >> could join the effort. I see > 100 companies claiming they are powered by= >> Apache Hadoop. >>=20 >> I also hope with this effort HBase will be able to start moving to the ne= w >> append implementation in the next 2-3 months, which in turn will help 0.2= 2 >> HDFS >> rather than divert resources from it as it would have be with 0.20-append= . >>=20 >> Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival? >>=20 >> One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in control of external >> releases and distributions, but we should not fork our own releases by >> introducing >> competing apis. If we can keep the dev line relatively straight the exter= nal >> releases >> will follow. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> --Konstantin >>=20 >>=20 >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote:= >>=20 >>> The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring to was supposed to >>> be out 13-15 months ago. Pardon if I look for solutions that deploy 4 >>> months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). >>>=20 >>> Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly helping HDFS either. >>>=20 >>> -ryan >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be >>>> spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and >>>> continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. I >>>> believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 >>>> (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). >>>>=20 >>>> The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, >>>> timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of >>>> new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria >>>> discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation >>>> where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void >>>> such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and >>>> fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us >>>> closer to that goal. >>>>=20 >>>> I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has >>>> placed HBase into. However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to >>>> help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, >>>> is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify >>>> the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's stop digging this hole. >>>> -jakob >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas >>> wrote: >>>>> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] >>>>>=20 >>>>> There are two append solutions floating around, and they are >>> incompatible >>>>> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain >>> incompatible >>>>> with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, 0.23, >>> 0.20.3, >>>>> e.t.c.) >>>>>=20 >>>>> Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to "use= >>>>> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split Hadoo= p >>> into >>>>> two. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley >>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding = >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug >>>>>>> found then we would have to release a new version of the append >>>>>>> version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second ta= g, >>> but >>>>>> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between 0.20= >>> and >>>>>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be fixed= >>> in >>>>>> the >>>>>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves a= >>> way >>>>>> to >>>>>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version strin= g >>> like >>>>>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering >>> and >>>>>> suggest a version jump. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append >>> branch, >>>>>> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the >>> 0.20 >>>>>> branch. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> -- Owen >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2607-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Dec 23 23:53:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59270 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 23:53:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2010 23:53:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 67741 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 23:53:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67673 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2010 23:53:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67665 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2010 23:53:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:53:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:53:18 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7569914iwn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.17.205 with SMTP id t13mr8554348iba.80.1293148376916; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:52:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.188.102 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:52:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:52:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325575a1aa5e53b04981c91e8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325575a1aa5e53b04981c91e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > The release is one issue, but ongoing maintenance of it is another, which > is the point roy raised. > > It's a concern if we have a security issue, and who will patch it (and test > it) going forward. > The nice thing is that Hadoop 0.20.x (without security patches) has no guarantees as to security. So, I can't imagine any security issue that could possibly exist that would be worth addressing. It doesn't run as root so root escalation is only possible with a JVM bug, and it's trivially possible to read anyone's data since 0.20 has no strong authentication. Thanks -Todd > > --- > Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 > > I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- > Michelangelo > > On 24/12/2010, at 9:39 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > > > How does stack volunteering his time to release an existing branch > > divert resources? > > > > Without an ASF release of 0.20-append I will keep having to recommend > > an external vendor's release of Hadoop. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > >> I also think building 0.20-append will be a major distraction from > moving > >> 0.22 forward with all the great new features, including the new append > >> implementation, sitting on the bench because we are delaying the > release. > >> It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to focus on 0.22 > rather > >> than chasing both birds. > >> > >> I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale testing as was the case > >> with 0.21. > >> I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale resources, as I can > grasp, > >> into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of course. > >> This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months rather than > >> "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even faster/better if others > >> could join the effort. I see > 100 companies claiming they are powered > by > >> Apache Hadoop. > >> > >> I also hope with this effort HBase will be able to start moving to the > new > >> append implementation in the next 2-3 months, which in turn will help > 0.22 > >> HDFS > >> rather than divert resources from it as it would have be with > 0.20-append. > >> > >> Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival? > >> > >> One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in control of external > >> releases and distributions, but we should not fork our own releases by > >> introducing > >> competing apis. If we can keep the dev line relatively straight the > external > >> releases > >> will follow. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> --Konstantin > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson > wrote: > >> > >>> The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring to was supposed to > >>> be out 13-15 months ago. Pardon if I look for solutions that deploy 4 > >>> months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). > >>> > >>> Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly helping HDFS either. > >>> > >>> -ryan > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan > wrote: > >>>> It's difficult to support this proposal knowing how much time would be > >>>> spent preparing an official release, continuing to support it and > >>>> continuing to two support two separate implementations of append. I > >>>> believe that effort would be better spent getting out a kick-ass 22 > >>>> (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). > >>>> > >>>> The Promised Land that we say we're all trying to get to is regular, > >>>> timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative but stable releases of > >>>> new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out any one of those criteria > >>>> discovered will continue (and has continued) the current situation > >>>> where quasi-official branches and outside distributions fill the void > >>>> such a release should. The effort to maintain this offical branch and > >>>> fix the bugs that will be discovered could be better spent moving us > >>>> closer to that goal. > >>>> > >>>> I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult position our quagmire has > >>>> placed HBase into. However, the current proposal would hurt HDFS to > >>>> help HBase. The best solution for that project, as well as for HDFS, > >>>> is to get HDFS back to a healthy release cycle; not prolong or codify > >>>> the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's stop digging this hole. > >>>> -jakob > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas > >>> wrote: > >>>>> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the obvious ] > >>>>> > >>>>> There are two append solutions floating around, and they are > >>> incompatible > >>>>> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" will forever remain > >>> incompatible > >>>>> with each other, regardless of how they are numbered (0.22, 0.23, > >>> 0.20.3, > >>>>> e.t.c.) > >>>>> > >>>>> Unless both are merged into one branch, and a switch provided to > "use > >>>>> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we have effectively split > Hadoop > >>> into > >>>>> two. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen O'Malley > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding < > fielding@gbiv.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Features are not release version tags. If there is a security bug > >>>>>>> found then we would have to release a new version of the append > >>>>>>> version, and a round of severe trout slapping would result. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and it doesn't scale to a second > tag, > >>> but > >>>>>> the problem is that this is effectively a release branch between > 0.20 > >>> and > >>>>>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any critical bugs would need to be > fixed > >>> in > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you want to stick to pure numbers and we want to leave ourselves > a > >>> way > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without append, we'd could use a version > string > >>> like > >>>>>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it does preserve the numeric ordering > >>> and > >>>>>> suggest a version jump. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If I remember right, there were also protocol changes in the append > >>> branch, > >>>>>> which was another reason we didn't want to put it directly into the > >>> 0.20 > >>>>>> branch. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- Owen > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --000325575a1aa5e53b04981c91e8-- From general-return-2608-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 00:37:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82650 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 00:37:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 00:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 11760 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 00:37:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11678 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 00:37:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11663 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 00:37:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:37:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.228] (HELO nm7-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:37:16 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Dec 2010 00:36:55 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.170] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Dec 2010 00:36:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1053.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Dec 2010 00:36:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 319196.28018.bm@omp1053.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91934 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Dec 2010 00:36:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293151015; bh=ZZY5UBDt/mqudcMKpFvVOt0T2bsKPJgAIrY6HQfdA4A=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=49J+Wgd5ZqX3TlpOCOkxph/2JSPvef30oFxWuFitM4q0ihv8PK9n7X9Rb0hH/dLl7ciZtI2bFSuYJEl2XQ3B74gVqZA8ljHt6Gi8Qye1u6WHdSwiBjl1T4wg0Bv5MbHRbE4NqAyit1R6QnUI0EjjFKSQdjsAHd1hx1TDg3VuDrI= Message-ID: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: b.IrugcVM1nGo09EAG.tlZrjOk7vguTdA2NWKosoA_UtoFD SLSid7kdMNJIELGDccNWBpaKFiNfb4NZ.Wh1eU6vkbOkTyDmF68GP8hg_gfG fjm51.hDkZMqEZyPAgSgbcRxUPgd._43pSlk5LkSrNaYh4sKeVPc0WZn8moF WWkXqhngfq.kZAbudb0W7qEhnupQIvh6SGXu3lHRT9XG2PvFZOSJRxILv8h4 QyoMdJFi53CQz9382NBp5w2W8KS6yCthCuRFvuXIC1DmGqQbZDgJv9bD8mT8 7IMhRXi7pN7PHE6QE91vSptvJnHwjwq1R2gblZ7umR50heH0pq.QlZDpiTxm bE6EJng.8Us2N72QPLmimnCCeRe0zRK_3XwZtc4R_HBw.HJH68NPcOJSkr63 iyJAvAz3luIs- Received: from [166.190.158.37] by web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:36:54 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:36:54 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I hope that 22 will be an answer. I think I would be more comfortable with = that answer if Hadoop Core were not so obviously internally conflicted and = sclerotic. Potential HBase/Hadoop adopters have confidence in 20 seeing the= production deployments of it. 21 was to all indications I have seen a dud.= There is no reasonable basis as of yet to presume 22 will be "kick ass". = =0A=0AI, at least, was hoping that promoting 0.20-append from its de-facto = status to something official could be a fig leaf for HBase while Hadoop Cor= e gets its house in order.=0A=0ABest regards,=0A=0A - Andy=0A=0AProblems= worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.=0A - Piet Hein (via T= om White)=0A=0A=0A--- On Thu, 12/23/10, Ryan Rawson wr= ote:=0A=0A> From: Ryan Rawson =0A> Subject: Re: DISCUSS= ION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append = branch?=0A> To: general@hadoop.apache.org=0A> Date: Thursday, December 23, = 2010, 2:39 PM=0A> How does stack volunteering his time=0A> to release an ex= isting branch=0A> divert resources?=0A> =0A> Without an ASF release of 0.20= -append I will keep having to=0A> recommend an external vendor's release of= Hadoop.=0A> =0A> =0A> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko= =0A> =0A> wrote:=0A> > I also think building 0.20-app= end will be a major=0A> distraction from moving=0A> > 0.22 forward with all= the great new features,=0A> including the new append=0A> > implementation,= sitting on the bench because we are=0A> delaying the release.=0A> > It see= ms to be beneficial for the entire community to=0A> focus on 0.22 rather=0A= > > than chasing both birds.=0A> >=0A> > I hear a concern that 0.22 will la= ck large scale=0A> testing as was the case=0A> > with 0.21.=0A> > I'd like = to volunteer to put as many large scale=0A> resources, as I can grasp,=0A> = > into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of=0A> course.=0A> > T= his should get us to production quality in 3-6 months=0A> rather than=0A> >= "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even=0A> faster/better if others=0A= > > could join the effort. I see > 100 companies=0A> claiming they are powe= red by=0A> > Apache Hadoop.=0A> >=0A> > I also hope with this effort HBase = will be able to=0A> start moving to the new=0A> > append implementation in = the next 2-3 months, which in=0A> turn will help 0.22=0A> > HDFS=0A> > rath= er than divert resources from it as it would have=0A> be with 0.20-append.= =0A> >=0A> > Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival?=0A> >=0A> = > One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in=0A> control of exter= nal=0A> > releases and distributions, but we should not fork our=0A> own re= leases by=0A> > introducing=0A> > competing apis. If we can keep the dev li= ne relatively=0A> straight the external=0A> > releases=0A> > will follow.= =0A> >=0A> > Thanks,=0A> > --Konstantin=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2= 010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson =0A> wrote:=0A> >=0A> >> T= he append solution in 0.22 that you are referring=0A> to was supposed to=0A= > >> be out 13-15 months ago. =A0Pardon if I look for=0A> solutions that de= ploy 4=0A> >> months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did).=0A> >>=0A> >> Ano= ther 12-15 months of delay is not exactly=0A> helping HDFS either.=0A> >>= =0A> >> -ryan=0A> >>=0A> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan=0A= > =0A> wrote:=0A> >> > It's difficult to support this pr= oposal=0A> knowing how much time would be=0A> >> > spent preparing an offic= ial release,=0A> continuing to support it and=0A> >> > continuing to two su= pport two separate=0A> implementations of append. =A0I=0A> >> > believe tha= t effort would be better spent=0A> getting out a kick-ass 22=0A> >> > (or, = barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23).=0A> >> >=0A> >> > The Promised Land = that we say we're all=0A> trying to get to is regular,=0A> >> > timely, fea= ture-complete, tested, innovative=0A> but stable releases of=0A> >> > new v= ersions of Apache Hadoop. =A0Missing out=0A> any one of those criteria=0A> = >> > discovered will continue (and has continued)=0A> the current situation= =0A> >> > where quasi-official branches and outside=0A> distributions fill = the void=0A> >> > such a release should. =A0The effort to=0A> maintain this= offical branch and=0A> >> > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be= =0A> better spent moving us=0A> >> > closer to that goal.=0A> >> >=0A> >> >= I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult=0A> position our quagmire has= =0A> >> > placed HBase into. =A0However, the current=0A> proposal would hur= t HDFS to=0A> >> > help HBase. The best solution for that=0A> project, as w= ell as for HDFS,=0A> >> > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release=0A> cycl= e; not prolong or codify=0A> >> > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. =A0L= et's=0A> stop digging this hole.=0A> >> > -jakob=0A> >> >=0A> >> > On Thu, = Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas=0A> =0A> >> wrote= :=0A> >> >> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the=0A> obvious ]=0A> >> >>=0A> = >> >> There are two append solutions floating=0A> around, and they are=0A> = >> incompatible=0A> >> >> with each other. Thus, the two "branches"=0A> wil= l forever remain=0A> >> incompatible=0A> >> >> with each other, regardless = of how they=0A> are numbered (0.22, =A00.23,=0A> >> =A00.20.3,=0A> >> >> e.= t.c.)=0A> >> >>=0A> >> >> Unless both are merged into one branch,=0A> and a= switch provided to =A0"use=0A> >> >> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append"= , we=0A> have effectively split Hadoop=0A> >> into=0A> >> >> two.=0A> >> >>= =0A> >> >>=0A> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen=0A> O'Malley =0A> >> wrote:=0A> >> >>=0A> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 = at 11:07 PM, Roy=0A> T. Fielding =0A> >> >>> wrote:=0A> = >> >>>=0A> >> >>> > Features are not release version=0A> tags. =A0If there = is a security bug=0A> >> >>> > found then we would have to=0A> release a ne= w version of the append=0A> >> >>> > version, and a round of severe=0A> tro= ut slapping would result.=0A> >> >>> >=0A> >> >>>=0A> >> >>> Yeah, it isn't= a perfect solution and=0A> it doesn't scale to a second tag,=0A> >> but=0A= > >> >>> the problem is that this is=0A> effectively a release branch betwe= en 0.20=0A> >> and=0A> >> >>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any=0A> critical= bugs would need to be fixed=0A> >> in=0A> >> >>> the=0A> >> >>> append bra= nch as well as the 0.20 and=0A> 0.21 branches.=0A> >> >>>=0A> >> >>> If you= want to stick to pure numbers=0A> and we want to leave ourselves a=0A> >> = way=0A> >> >>> to=0A> >> >>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without=0A> append, we'= d could use a version string=0A> >> like=0A> >> >>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pret= ty, but it=0A> does preserve the numeric ordering=0A> >> and=0A> >> >>> sug= gest a version jump.=0A> >> >>>=0A> >> >>> If I remember right, there were = also=0A> protocol changes in the append=0A> >> branch,=0A> >> >>> which was= another reason we didn't=0A> want to put it directly into the=0A> >> 0.20= =0A> >> >>> branch.=0A> >> >>>=0A> >> >>> -- Owen=0A> >> >>>=0A> >> >>=0A> = >> >=0A> >>=0A> >=0A> =0A=0A=0A From general-return-2609-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 01:32:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4077 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 01:32:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 01:32:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 57584 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57524 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57511 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:32:25 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7627857iwn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:32:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.225.202 with SMTP id it10mr8987993icb.496.1293154324822; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:32:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.178.193 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:32:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:32:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org, apurtell@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30549e612bba3604981df444 --20cf30549e612bba3604981df444 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 After reading through the reasoning on both sides of this issue, I agree with Ian, Konstantin, and Jakob. Nigel has already volunteered to run the 0.22 release process; let's put our energy there. Stack, the energy you would have put into the 0.20-append release could help ensure the 0.22 release makes it out in short order. That way HBase will be able to take advantage of both append (don't lose data) and security (don't give it away), and we won't derail the Hadoop Core release process, which has actually been regaining some momentum over the past several months: we got 0.21 out the door! we have a release manager for 0.22! As Roy points out, the Apache Hadoop release train has already passed 0.20; for those that require a 0.20-based HDFS with append, there are multiple places in the open source world to retrieve such bits, including the 0.20-append branch of the HDFS project. If the HBase community requires an ASF project to release such an artifact, as Roy points out, it can certainly done as a new project separate from HDFS. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I hope that 22 will be an answer. I think I would be more comfortable with > that answer if Hadoop Core were not so obviously internally conflicted and > sclerotic. Potential HBase/Hadoop adopters have confidence in 20 seeing the > production deployments of it. 21 was to all indications I have seen a dud. > There is no reasonable basis as of yet to presume 22 will be "kick ass". > > I, at least, was hoping that promoting 0.20-append from its de-facto status > to something official could be a fig leaf for HBase while Hadoop Core gets > its house in order. > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. > - Piet Hein (via Tom White) > > > --- On Thu, 12/23/10, Ryan Rawson wrote: > > > From: Ryan Rawson > > Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip > of branch-0.20-append branch? > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 2:39 PM > > How does stack volunteering his time > > to release an existing branch > > divert resources? > > > > Without an ASF release of 0.20-append I will keep having to > > recommend an external vendor's release of Hadoop. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > > wrote: > > > I also think building 0.20-append will be a major > > distraction from moving > > > 0.22 forward with all the great new features, > > including the new append > > > implementation, sitting on the bench because we are > > delaying the release. > > > It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to > > focus on 0.22 rather > > > than chasing both birds. > > > > > > I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale > > testing as was the case > > > with 0.21. > > > I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale > > resources, as I can grasp, > > > into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of > > course. > > > This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months > > rather than > > > "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even > > faster/better if others > > > could join the effort. I see > 100 companies > > claiming they are powered by > > > Apache Hadoop. > > > > > > I also hope with this effort HBase will be able to > > start moving to the new > > > append implementation in the next 2-3 months, which in > > turn will help 0.22 > > > HDFS > > > rather than divert resources from it as it would have > > be with 0.20-append. > > > > > > Stack, will this plan will work for HBase survival? > > > > > > One other thought. Apache Hadoop community is not in > > control of external > > > releases and distributions, but we should not fork our > > own releases by > > > introducing > > > competing apis. If we can keep the dev line relatively > > straight the external > > > releases > > > will follow. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Rawson > > wrote: > > > > > >> The append solution in 0.22 that you are referring > > to was supposed to > > >> be out 13-15 months ago. Pardon if I look for > > solutions that deploy 4 > > >> months ago (as the 0.20 append branch did). > > >> > > >> Another 12-15 months of delay is not exactly > > helping HDFS either. > > >> > > >> -ryan > > >> > > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jakob Homan > > > > wrote: > > >> > It's difficult to support this proposal > > knowing how much time would be > > >> > spent preparing an official release, > > continuing to support it and > > >> > continuing to two support two separate > > implementations of append. I > > >> > believe that effort would be better spent > > getting out a kick-ass 22 > > >> > (or, barring that, a *really* kick-ass 23). > > >> > > > >> > The Promised Land that we say we're all > > trying to get to is regular, > > >> > timely, feature-complete, tested, innovative > > but stable releases of > > >> > new versions of Apache Hadoop. Missing out > > any one of those criteria > > >> > discovered will continue (and has continued) > > the current situation > > >> > where quasi-official branches and outside > > distributions fill the void > > >> > such a release should. The effort to > > maintain this offical branch and > > >> > fix the bugs that will be discovered could be > > better spent moving us > > >> > closer to that goal. > > >> > > > >> > I'm certainly sympathetic to the difficult > > position our quagmire has > > >> > placed HBase into. However, the current > > proposal would hurt HDFS to > > >> > help HBase. The best solution for that > > project, as well as for HDFS, > > >> > is to get HDFS back to a healthy release > > cycle; not prolong or codify > > >> > the current ad-hoc state of affairs. Let's > > stop digging this hole. > > >> > -jakob > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, M. C. Srivas > > > > >> wrote: > > >> >> [ Sorry if this is be-laboring the > > obvious ] > > >> >> > > >> >> There are two append solutions floating > > around, and they are > > >> incompatible > > >> >> with each other. Thus, the two "branches" > > will forever remain > > >> incompatible > > >> >> with each other, regardless of how they > > are numbered (0.22, 0.23, > > >> 0.20.3, > > >> >> e.t.c.) > > >> >> > > >> >> Unless both are merged into one branch, > > and a switch provided to "use > > >> >> HDFS-200 append" or "use 0.22 append", we > > have effectively split Hadoop > > >> into > > >> >> two. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Owen > > O'Malley > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Roy > > T. Fielding > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Features are not release version > > tags. If there is a security bug > > >> >>> > found then we would have to > > release a new version of the append > > >> >>> > version, and a round of severe > > trout slapping would result. > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Yeah, it isn't a perfect solution and > > it doesn't scale to a second tag, > > >> but > > >> >>> the problem is that this is > > effectively a release branch between 0.20 > > >> and > > >> >>> 0.21. Of course I agree that any > > critical bugs would need to be fixed > > >> in > > >> >>> the > > >> >>> append branch as well as the 0.20 and > > 0.21 branches. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If you want to stick to pure numbers > > and we want to leave ourselves a > > >> way > > >> >>> to > > >> >>> bugfix the 0.20 branch without > > append, we'd could use a version string > > >> like > > >> >>> 0.20.100, etc. Not pretty, but it > > does preserve the numeric ordering > > >> and > > >> >>> suggest a version jump. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> If I remember right, there were also > > protocol changes in the append > > >> branch, > > >> >>> which was another reason we didn't > > want to put it directly into the > > >> 0.20 > > >> >>> branch. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -- Owen > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --20cf30549e612bba3604981df444-- From general-return-2610-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 05:18:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82404 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 05:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 05:18:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 66093 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 05:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65970 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 05:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65962 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 05:18:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:18:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:18:15 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so7097561wye.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.63.15 with SMTP id z15mr9737392wec.74.1293167873526; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:17:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:17:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7277DB0B-9B56-4B57-A574-F2764C11FC10@Holsman.NET> <21FEBF88-2D56-48E0-B86C-334E94F04188@gbiv.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:17:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hA5yv3PqOqEMdLSqBOmyh-xQeXo Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 14:18, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I also think building 0.20-append will be a major distraction from moving > 0.22 forward with all the great new features, including the new append > implementation, sitting on the bench because we are delaying the release. > It seems to be beneficial for the entire community to focus on 0.22 rather > than chasing both birds. > > I hear a concern that 0.22 will lack large scale testing as was the case > with 0.21. > I'd like to volunteer to put as many large scale resources, as I can grasp, > into stabilizing of 0.22. Under Nigel's management of course. > This should get us to production quality in 3-6 months rather than > "another 12-15". I also hope it can go even faster/better if others > could join the effort. I see > 100 companies claiming they are powered by > Apache Hadoop. On the similar note I's like to emphasize that a significant part of my time is going to be devoted to building system & scale testing infrastructure which would usable out of the box by any of those 100+ companies if they are willing to put any effort into testing of 0.22. Cos From general-return-2611-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 07:53:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50568 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 07:53:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 07:53:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 29599 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 07:53:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 07:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29481 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 07:53:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:53:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:53:10 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so6793448fxm.35 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KF0Zhy31hX971ynuZfGyZkIOmkUiFiT0a7EBMbfvkZQ=; b=xzLHD3xu1Qd2qTvty/zXo9eBNp86aQd3CR2vh6wTqRb220Wfcky2zuvvQL3QB/MIIn ls/ygblbBG2ATqQ+vphzDzIJwaCBg6sxPOHpODhE9Wby3lbQ6jK+Vl7mSPygS+xORgqP e7iaYpwEkqcyolwSFUrqdUhQLKUpAPjjawcOM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=o7k+YuAwU4Cl4gSYKBF4/xVFcOZmG3ngUj1drEcvQXKO0ysUOG6AiA95MOdqI+bOtW 6FFAO8QFx11Q5JUal64MfGD3/CldKIjMrTX+D4ma8qY+Ivf3Tq04FTQ4UnehrN2cME9I FcNbNNaurz3pzd5x8mH5cQLGVJCXf3sl17g7I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.125.196 with SMTP id z4mr5250335far.124.1293177170034; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: elmGw7W-THiDmJorBtbKYpFNU9c Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The intent of the proposed release off the branch-0.20-append was never to derail, =93hurt=94, or distract from the Hadoop 0.22 effort. The HBase crew are up for helping out testing and debugging and the intent is to run atop the 0.22 version of append as well as 0.20=92s append. A release off the branch-0.20-append branch was more about a =91stop-gap=92, see Todd=92s explication above, or a =91fig-leaf=92 as Andrew describes it while 0.22 is stabilizing. Suggestions that projects like HBase hibernate until 0.22 don=92t help (See Ryan=92s comments for a sense of why). We can just keep on with what we=92ve been doing up to this if the feeling is that an append release could somehow jeopardize the 0.22 effort. Its kinda hokey having to point users at some random looking branch [1] telling them build their own but thankfully this is not their only option. I=92ve enjoyed the healthy back and forth, St.Ack 1. To be clear, 'random looking branch' is fruit of a bunch of hardwork by Facebookers and Clouderians. From general-return-2612-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 18:57:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21467 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 18:57:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 18:57:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 84466 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 18:57:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84415 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 18:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84407 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 18:57:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 21340 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 18:57:13 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:57:13 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so7132536iyb.35 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:57:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.17.203 with SMTP id t11mr9446803iba.141.1293217032350; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:57:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:57:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anything go wrong if HBase were to release the 0.20-append branch as its own product? Even if it were short-lived, it sounds like that would give HBase users a working append, the HBase project could decide when to retire that work (and support it concurrently with post-0.20 append), and it sidesteps the versioning issue. -C On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Stack wrote: > The intent of the proposed release off the branch-0.20-append was > never to derail, =93hurt=94, or distract from the Hadoop 0.22 effort. =A0= The > HBase crew are up for helping out testing and debugging and the intent > is to run atop the 0.22 version of append as well as 0.20=92s append. =A0= A > release off the branch-0.20-append branch was more about a =91stop-gap=92= , > see Todd=92s explication above, or a =91fig-leaf=92 as Andrew describes i= t > while 0.22 is stabilizing. > > Suggestions that projects like HBase hibernate until 0.22 don=92t help > (See Ryan=92s comments for a sense of why). We can just keep on with > what we=92ve been doing up to this if the feeling is that an append > release could somehow jeopardize the 0.22 effort. =A0Its kinda hokey > having to point users at some random looking branch [1] telling them > build their own but thankfully this is not their only option. > > I=92ve enjoyed the healthy back and forth, > > St.Ack > 1. To be clear, 'random looking branch' is fruit of a bunch of > hardwork by Facebookers and Clouderians. > From general-return-2613-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 19:07:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31063 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 19:07:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 19:07:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 88460 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88363 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:07:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88355 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 19:07:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:07:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:07:26 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so7172634fxm.35 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zTturMsdH2ELtWhfVnwXgKQeqhvX1wK+IYhiMaV4QS8=; b=KT7wmtGLjxRsMFqFsv/O1Z++7ZVgk5KbmaOBbIbHUePjpqupJUn2y59EOLqNW1UggB 4w1BR5sZ0OoTvQ8w+tvANluDVanr1xSH47BugqTF1PRbGWfyn1Fi+k9jnnd1HPxTzuoh s6LnY3KrPuKHP1g0XAXh27BKRbGYstI73obnU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qMNbyWzzUYYrXELEsXWGLF+REGyV3jYFzDzuL2EGexkz7Lf9IO5fSapYDtBrX1I6Eb Egd1xgMYOe4YHpjxPmZpxb1VHR962ZUoSfMDkhHfYG7ByXPmiulT2PMiLR4F4RX+JeLJ p5uUO2Ivy6p1xwmQOpumM1ywgHGsqwijp0LgM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.125.196 with SMTP id z4mr10934far.124.1293217604011; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:06:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:06:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:06:43 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qr8xhjbSNrOlFOyOOx6b5yzRsrM Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Does anything go wrong if HBase were to release the 0.20-append branch > as its own product? > This is an interesting notion. We'd host it at hbase.apache.org alongside our download? Would that be OK with others? St.Ack From general-return-2614-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 19:29:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34650 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 19:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 19:29:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 99789 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99720 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99710 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 19:29:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:29:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:29:20 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so7150315iyb.35 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:28:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.213.200 with SMTP id gx8mr9800792icb.362.1293218938001; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:28:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.178.193 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:28:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:28:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354477c6e6a998004982cff1b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --002354477c6e6a998004982cff1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That sounds like a reasonable solution to me: the HBase team bears the burden of cutting an maintaining the release, while Hadoop Core can proceed with 0.22. HBase had its own version of ZooKeeper in there for a while, if I recall correctly, so it's not without precedent. No funky version numbers have to be floating around Hadoop-land, and hopefully HBase can move back to HDFS when 0.22 is released. It's not ideal, but potentially the best solution given the current constraints. On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Chris Douglas > wrote: > > Does anything go wrong if HBase were to release the 0.20-append branch > > as its own product? > > > > This is an interesting notion. We'd host it at hbase.apache.org > alongside our download? Would that be OK with others? > St.Ack > --002354477c6e6a998004982cff1b-- From general-return-2615-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Dec 24 19:32:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35484 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 19:32:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 19:32:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 2618 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2566 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 19:32:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2558 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 19:32:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:32:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:32:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 35284 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 19:31:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:31:39 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so7151839iyb.35 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:31:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.77 with SMTP id z13mr9419855iba.166.1293219098269; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:31:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:31:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 11:31:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Calling it something other than Hadoop would avoid confusing users (and HBase could then release bug fixes, etc. on its own schedule), but from how it's been described: this is acknowledging the reality of the situation, not proposing something radical. HBase can be backed by the HBase FooFS and HDFS. If the former can be retired as a legacy platform that'd be ideal, but Hadoop will have to earn it. -C On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Chris Douglas wro= te: >> Does anything go wrong if HBase were to release the 0.20-append branch >> as its own product? >> > > This is an interesting notion. =A0We'd host it at hbase.apache.org > alongside our download? =A0Would that be OK with others? > St.Ack > From general-return-2616-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Dec 25 21:21:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12648 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2010 21:21:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Dec 2010 21:21:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31714 invoked by uid 500); 25 Dec 2010 21:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31547 invoked by uid 500); 25 Dec 2010 21:21:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73077 invoked by uid 99); 25 Dec 2010 06:43:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:41:13 -0800 Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? Thread-Topic: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? Thread-Index: Acuj/tK5zWUIRp8ZT8636FkVxtLG1Q== Message-ID: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I have a feeling we are thinking too much here.=20 The reality is that the Hadoop community was in favor of porting append (fi= xes?) back to a branch based off hadoop-0.20 a while ago (Dhruba proposed t= he branch). I see no reason we can't release it now, under a reasonable release name. As Stack and Ryan have pointed out, we have severely hampered HBase so far.= It behooves us to facilitate users of the entire stack to easily access Ap= ache releases. Plus, Stack and co. are volunteering their own time (thanks!= ). Arun Sent from my iPhone On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:33 AM, "Chris Douglas" wrote: > Calling it something other than Hadoop would avoid confusing users > (and HBase could then release bug fixes, etc. on its own schedule), > but from how it's been described: this is acknowledging the reality of > the situation, not proposing something radical. >=20 > HBase can be backed by the HBase FooFS and HDFS. If the former can be > retired as a legacy platform that'd be ideal, but Hadoop will have to > earn it. -C >=20 > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Stack wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Chris Douglas wr= ote: >>> Does anything go wrong if HBase were to release the 0.20-append branch >>> as its own product? >>>=20 >>=20 >> This is an interesting notion. We'd host it at hbase.apache.org >> alongside our download? Would that be OK with others? >> St.Ack >>=20 From general-return-2617-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 26 06:03:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57931 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2010 06:03:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Dec 2010 06:03:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 16570 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 06:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16435 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 06:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16427 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2010 06:03:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 06:03:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 06:03:26 +0000 Received: by yib17 with SMTP id 17so1679936yib.35 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:03:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gER+zBeC+fow005Hoe1FSACsuKtuXWRWJeYSNkW+OfI=; b=Wpnf0PPaq8AXfoP5ZlFMWl4M0xUXmb/GyjKGGBkSXbgLUIFNfYcTzpYXv0RVF2CHNY DJwJPJgAaEGALSBJIeSg+C1t1HqfyNXVd+Idj6D5jlJV8BpkhmkgJMNuWvOD868tZhVT ml8nfPFrTSVBF83+ZQxHxiiFBi5cuwfd9Q6ic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=xtkp2Y3+uDoFZuNYxqa5/1TI4xKMSS2n8ZvwnrZCtUK+jL6u/mlNH+GHwtINhpMqEH 6zPehTPu/EPp/hVuhamISX9F8Xr0FmWLH9ovEhHbli8BatIDHWA7OunKha/Boiq+Y72e NWX6bqRbzbtUFYgK8iHdj9inEwq2I99tU6Nfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.147.8 with SMTP id z8mr15584831ybn.101.1293343385089; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:03:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.38.17 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:03:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:03:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: how does hadoop handle the counter of the failed task and speculative task From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517511b040a75e2049849f9ff --001517511b040a75e2049849f9ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I define the counter to count the bad records, there is below code in map task; reporter.incrCounter("bad',"records', 1), When the job is completed, the pritnt the result to use below code: long total = counters.findCounter("bad","records").getCounter(); But I have two questions about the counter: 1. If the map task is retried 4 times, and the last map task is successful, I think the counter of the other three map tasks should be not included in ultima result, is that right? 2. If there are speculative tasks, I think the counter of speculative tasks should be not included in ultima result, is that right? Thanks, LiuLei --001517511b040a75e2049849f9ff-- From general-return-2618-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 26 09:59:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23827 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2010 09:59:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Dec 2010 09:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 81357 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 09:59:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81146 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 09:59:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81138 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2010 09:59:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:59:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:58:59 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so7807832fxm.35 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:58:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m6S2XFBjCNMeyleowQwICW2HIMXBKeNCPgalCGfoNeo=; b=VUdD0t7efJo/AyFlcmm4HyAtS1ZHkToQEvawcRoAHZxwiorekqJUcXEJJGOBAl1Zw7 CCocvOuRV8lVpowx5U+U+4RAoc8BO5gRtfF5+3gpq95t08yxUbDHRnqQZOpTAZ3LfULr Rs33LB1LoAuer0x93MqwFEjbprWUK/m4LX7xY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J9d2uqdGyT5V5Ljw0NBJ4oPIU9Au++dz3jjGiGpz5mVZ6P9288CSPu8lDaw7RSTFTG f4sk8WclBDb8piytSltIQraAiheC+5VHIw8L81N57lJDLenTquPODW/PCzQGn2+RqxbP OVgSSw8+uz0ZY5VFBNAk+jy+NVemX6VfZuYDU= Received: by 10.223.114.65 with SMTP id d1mr1817216faq.36.1293357518524; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:58:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:58:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:28:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how does hadoop handle the counter of the failed task and speculative task To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, lei liu wrote: > But I have two questions about the counter: > 1. If the map task is retried 4 times, and the last map task is successfu= l, > I think the counter of the other three map tasks should be not included i= n > ultima result, is that right? Yes. > 2. If there are speculative tasks, =A0I think the counter of speculative = tasks > should be not included in ultima result, is that right? Yes. A Job's counters are calculated via the sum of all TaskInProgress-es (TIPs) under it ("It" being the JIP - JobInProgress). So the end result would be only the successful ones as the counters are recomputed for all changes in the TIP's status. During execution, it would project the best available counter (as in, from the task attempt that has the best overall progress compared to others). --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2619-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 26 10:52:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38712 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2010 10:52:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Dec 2010 10:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 382 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 10:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 177 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 10:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 169 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2010 10:52:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:52:22 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so4089532yxm.35 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:52:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CvScoQZLHIVtGcnHSor21Ef5095lh7Oz3hamAZkZaOg=; b=LOvdmFvh1fssRwTVtHDUkB4cHQPzhM93LnWTeRoeIGzeJ6dcJxkTKxNyhtuSOxvF2i Xhr9LXDwuKQfcdetX2HPiWSyrvDIyHhIkUGGTzUDT7EaXUHsARiUxZUEUEOIQUSkPyvX DJ+Yt3cQrMSQahY8HzQOsNmMT8qngidYYt/4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=fWMJmDPWdT/Oy35VL2kLWYTrjqBY+zGZIf61Sab7Yt7k9UxE9WLn+c3uuLVgK6+0Ja i4WTUUgYKlvDeCwcn4yS8cVvX9HrjLVbWGCGxP3ih0rjY+pcb+HQT2HebxM+2LBanJab nECFIfoxAfqqqOerX6g9rZCRM/ZA6jxxUgXNg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.200.16 with SMTP id x16mr15569166ybf.215.1293360721812; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.38.17 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:52:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:52:01 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: use hadoop to create solr index From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd348ac63dba504984e02a4 --000e0cd348ac63dba504984e02a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I want to use hadoop to create solr index, I need to add solr.jar,lucene.jar and other many jars to job classpath, I know the Jobconf.setJar(String jar) method can add one jar to job classpath, I use the method to add the jar which include map/reduce classes to job classpath, how can I add other jars to job classpath? Thanks, LiuLei --000e0cd348ac63dba504984e02a4-- From general-return-2620-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Dec 26 11:29:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50904 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2010 11:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Dec 2010 11:29:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 10479 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 11:29:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10135 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2010 11:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10127 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2010 11:29:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:29:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:29:26 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so7831072fxm.35 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 03:29:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CpvamFyzTXzn++pFTyO9PiS7wQeGvnc5TY4XY01nMl4=; b=f7S9YJKqbKNKky7IKsvuTkejR27bmgMh8PWN8/rZiBFwl10SvgSNR20Kb/TPeEcDyb fMRgZYfTzcjK1z/EdyhDaao6dNwV/ybaGsLg2MwQGOWf0RT4zehQN7SOoWUBtrcfheZq HmItLSokn5WnZCmEkK7rimZwWmpwkK+MSbxaY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Wo/Nr4qUBAYQlGcR1NYNFfXl4H8YoAJ27M4sVZy8kL/3ppD0Wldm/IBEF5Jv0zsQPU wINxjUK0sNURL9nZWG7fNJsG2L8v3tl0bkLRELQ3J2HApfBdopR1/dTUGb1UGxfmjR25 /VNHpOY2ALh6ZI7yXZarh8vTTmDdrUZg0iezk= Received: by 10.223.87.3 with SMTP id u3mr1810923fal.131.1293362944870; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 03:29:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 03:28:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:58:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: use hadoop to create solr index To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Use the DistributedCache. Load your jars to HDFS and then use DC to add it to your job driver program. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/api/org/apache/hadoop/filecache/DistributedCache.html [Look at addFileToClassPath(...)] Or use the GenericOption "-libjars" from command-line while triggering the job, as documented here: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/commands_manual.html#Generic+Options. -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2621-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 27 15:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31199 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2010 15:05:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2010 15:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 66455 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 15:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66302 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 15:04:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66294 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 15:04:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:04:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:04:51 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so8916756qwh.35 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:04:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wjNdJqxCkLyNmFY9m6lgH66e52QMDl9rvpe8ZBpddxM=; b=M17i9HXsxmgC5RceiFKwZFVWzNtAM0ar48WT1Hff+I+g8LCHd+A0FppTDj+dbfLesl DtGlyvK3X1O+X4NZHZv8gZ02P4gD80zELUU1AYuJbrm8C6sEzYkVZEoZigk0HlbOgF+8 b4gdSsnnZOpPo6wFRM+30zlixvTSnQ6kpd5N0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=o7ypPFNSsFfnABZ9qHQkv33O/s+Xuj7B+VcAbuNjpOdtGqjgkRRta3nApeDayI5uhl 2SnCpZ9YMjXGJ+9bj/lm7/pdShrW1eCk6HEjStlhFGicPZGxfZPywTxdFXFslr41QO1V JtJ19ojJ5q0pKNCLJcreUtDd45qE5DbIHb150= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.199.6 with SMTP id eq6mr11671805qab.272.1293462270046; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:04:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:04:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Namenode failover From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was wondering if anyone has the procedure for Namenode failover for 0.21? I have seen the instructions for 0.20 (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/NameNodeFailover) but it seems 0.21 has new features such as a backup node. Would a backup node make the failover transparent? TIA From general-return-2622-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 27 15:33:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48548 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2010 15:33:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2010 15:33:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 94099 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 15:33:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93920 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 15:33:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93912 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 15:33:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:33:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:33:30 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so8415065fxm.35 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:33:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ZyJyWZkR5/AaBMMwmzcj9kX/alp4YjLFyyzn4pJTQzI=; b=pluuFdkqHh9/LempQu8fnKGgsUgpKFcDiRXp1VyIPZ9ozxAFn4gK87HV8JZDnlDu// ynkfQ9UWf6m8TYIB6Y94/9VznC3KWmGSk5MNFeHkpiPxkseVYC3gQ6QWpmQaSYisoZ7q EE8S79a3xDIGlPbLif0U/QFLvXMdQMl5aQbMU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=tFC1m/za9wjMh33Uc3bO7P4JiWDvzRtY1P6Oarc4GuJztUez6a0ZnirCbqVFMxtMc9 lbJ/goPgdXioQsxl8uHkeFUniaMepLSXMCMUq/7fFcepO2F55675iD01NvA30auII2v6 DtF+LD7B+/c8LsbEi7y9MJ7IRnN4Fm9NSP8+Y= Received: by 10.223.114.65 with SMTP id d1mr3059590faq.36.1293463988602; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:33:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:32:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:02:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Namenode failover To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think AvatarNode is what you're looking for. The BN will not take over AFAIK. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has the procedure for Namenode failover for > 0.21? I have seen the instructions for 0.20 > (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/NameNodeFailover) but it seems 0.21 has > new features such as a backup node. Would a backup node make the > failover transparent? > > TIA > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2623-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 27 17:12:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88179 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2010 17:12:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2010 17:12:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 86307 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 17:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86074 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 17:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86066 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 17:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:12:41 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so8482291fxm.35 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=A+w/fCBDNojqj5N8Efyb0nATBOwHedVP9zaKEYlHM5c=; b=fe+3o0d+KRbfeGbrd++WbMNec41FrS5ehO4aB5vNlVlGg7ods6UgkLknGxXzqkJO0S mdsEjF90prr4WRpmnnhUGJfkRsZ9fL9eQkbqfar6cphNLnWwjJVmopdZw2Qmbcem9zRk yeMs+5LNx/D/VzaJpexx5yWBotCDuZoqfV5Rk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wGx/3hPPbHmQ/SAjc+2tOKRt4/O6Myq2dpycGwuLmBExusiFA6M4WxP4Ibt6Vz84Qb A6/mmqDjasxLKbIKjpWTP3ekV+aOKzE86gtgFKOy1wx5YWfpOpIAs712DeWzEgBQvRoF 4rFTqsiQNqxt12XscUgMGDMksWBr+QT7RXdP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.86.199 with SMTP id t7mr6226797fal.29.1293469940848; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:12:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:12:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:12:20 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tg2wYt7DCEQNOHuj4_Yz_HVbho4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Calling it something other than Hadoop would avoid confusing users > (and HBase could then release bug fixes, etc. on its own schedule), > but from how it's been described: this is acknowledging the reality of > the situation, not proposing something radical. > Calling it other than Hadoop would only confuse the situation even more; "Trust all your data to fooFS!". It'd also reeks of HDFS 'fork' (HBase is not yet up for taking on such a burden). I liked my original reading of your suggestion Chris -- even if it was perhaps not what you intended -- where HBase would host hadoop-0.20-append. Thats not on? St.Ack P.S. Arun, I agree. From general-return-2624-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Dec 27 19:20:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37737 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2010 19:20:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2010 19:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 3191 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 19:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3117 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 19:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3109 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 19:20:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:20:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 37705 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 19:20:07 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:20:07 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so9162185iyb.35 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:20:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.7 with SMTP id a7mr12659372ibd.16.1293477606582; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:20:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:20:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:20:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Chris Douglas wro= te: > Calling it other than Hadoop would only confuse the situation even > more; "Trust all your data to fooFS!". =A0It'd also reeks of HDFS 'fork' > (HBase is not yet up for taking on such a burden). Unless I'm missing something, it is a fork. It's a temporary, friendly fork, but it's what the HBase project has been using and supporting for months. It hasn't had a label assigned to it, but it's a product (a feature with a mostly-shared implementation across other forks, at any rate). > I liked my original reading of your suggestion Chris -- even if it was > perhaps not what you intended -- where HBase would host > hadoop-0.20-append. =A0Thats not on? Your original reading was what I intended. The obstacle to releasing a variant of Hadoop from the HBase project is the name. I'd be surprised if TLPs were permitted to release under another project's name, even if the other endorsed it. If that assumption is not a real constraint, then I agree that there's no point in calling it something else. -C From general-return-2625-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 28 17:09:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18535 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2010 17:09:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2010 17:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 79581 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 17:09:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79216 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 17:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79206 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 17:09:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:09:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:09:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 18262 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 17:09:31 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:09:31 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so9819927bwz.35 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.113.65 with SMTP id z1mr11390451bkp.58.1293556169159; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.76.14 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012220856.27550.thomas@koch.ro> References: <201012220856.27550.thomas@koch.ro> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:09:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test instance of Gerrit? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, thomas@koch.ro, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cd8ff5b50b04987b83e5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502cd8ff5b50b04987b83e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: Now my question is, whether there's some interest from developers to give > Gerrit a try? In this case, I'd setup a private toy instance and import > your > project. > I'll give it a try. Could you import hadoop common, hdfs, and mapreduce? -- Owen --00504502cd8ff5b50b04987b83e5-- From general-return-2626-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 28 22:05:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26369 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2010 22:05:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2010 22:05:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 85636 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85555 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85547 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 22:05:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:05:10 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,241,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35761421" Received: from emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Dec 2010 14:04:49 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.69]) by emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:04:48 -0800 From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: "'user@hbase.apache.org'" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" CC: "Taylor, Ronald C" , "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:04:48 -0800 Subject: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acul2gQhGBzjuFTiQL2qQO67SCiwKwA/gmuw Message-ID: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> In-Reply-To: <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Folks, We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop= cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the o= rder of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the = uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system in= to HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range.=20 Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Ja= va MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file= listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and = then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program.=20 Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copy= FromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with th= e Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file= upload across the nodes. Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods?= Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would v= ery much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed migh= t become a bottleneck. - Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov From general-return-2627-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 28 22:27:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33821 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2010 22:27:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2010 22:27:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8955 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:27:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8879 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:27:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8824 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 22:27:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:27:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of patrickangeles@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:27:14 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so4285752eyz.35 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:26:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ot9wrs+lB/C7R3jZNp6+9iHipDUp6lVxgiet6/ySjmY=; b=QPBRiCNDOx400S9RKlGSzd/wH/yTI7ptyutHswz7GWECi1vMBRBISQ6ksXQknbXJTl SjGWsHAiIHuaAEOrPJgvHMgboDZsUT7dTrDx8tIxW7qeuSaaiblA2xK+1Vx25Foip/Lk rITOgkPhCMj2/oly7r6Z9s4ZqyBsskGpf3phc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=GONJUhNSi4WlLbZ45QZX00lTYstknkakHoyVaGSPbJ6WZyCgIFCG/bmRy3TOqDnIzA yW1EPS4L10HISjxoLi0GhrS8VDRqRDp2Be5+yZ2ddJvslrzomfc14GcGkj8D9ZVdFqKa W6EECj3teinxY0meu4oXDoyX6ih++yHutMUvY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.26.74 with SMTP id d10mr12381052ebc.61.1293575214266; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:26:54 -0800 (PST) Sender: patrickangeles@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.108.147 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:26:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:26:54 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IbSbpCBlG5eBbtBpr8OTHzRo-Ag Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Patrick Angeles To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "Taylor, Ronald C" , "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bdc9c22f88304987ff38c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174bdc9c22f88304987ff38c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ron, While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through your network and finally onto HDFS. The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. Regards, - Patrick On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop > cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the > order of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the > uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system > into HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a > Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a > file listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, > and then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs > -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, > with the Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out > the file upload across the nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods? > Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would > very much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed > might become a bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > > --0015174bdc9c22f88304987ff38c-- From general-return-2628-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Dec 28 22:48:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38946 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2010 22:48:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2010 22:48:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 33475 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:48:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33392 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2010 22:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33376 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 22:48:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:48:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:48:13 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,241,1291622400"; d="scan'208,217";a="35763781" Received: from emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Dec 2010 14:47:53 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.69]) by emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:47:52 -0800 From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: 'Patrick Angeles' , "'user@hbase.apache.org'" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" CC: "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" , "Taylor, Ronald C" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:47:51 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acum3lXvlgdunCAPQK+rrVcPxbnXKgAAF6jw Message-ID: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010822D50028EMAIL05pnlg_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010822D50028EMAIL05pnlg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick, Thanks for the info (and quick reply). I want to make sure I understand: Pr= esuming that the data files are coming off a set of disk drives attached to= a single Linux file server, you say I need two things to optimize the tran= sfer: 1) a fat network pipe 2) some way of parallelizing the reads So - I will check into network hardware, in regard to (1). But for (2), is = the MapReduce method that I was think of, a way that uses "hadoop fs -copyF= romLocal" in each Mapper, a good way to go at the destination end? I believ= e that you were saying that it is indeed OK, but I want to double-check, si= nce this will be a critical piece of our work flow. Ron ________________________________ From: patrickangeles@gmail.com [mailto:patrickangeles@gmail.com] On Behalf = Of Patrick Angeles Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 2:27 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Fox, Kevin M; Brown, David M J= R Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the= Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Ron, While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely bottle= neck is the source system (where the files come from). If the files are com= ing from a single server, then parallelizing the load won't gain you much p= ast a certain point. You have to figure in how fast you can read the file(s= ) off disk(s) and push the bits through your network and finally onto HDFS. The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat networ= k pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. Regards, - Patrick On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C > wrote: Folks, We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop= cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the o= rder of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the = uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system in= to HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Ja= va MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file= listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and = then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program. Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copy= FromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with th= e Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file= upload across the nodes. Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods?= Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would v= ery much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed migh= t become a bottleneck. - Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov --_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010822D50028EMAIL05pnlg_-- From general-return-2629-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 29 00:05:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65448 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2010 00:05:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2010 00:05:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 16879 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 00:05:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16761 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 00:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16753 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 00:05:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:05:02 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,242,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35767280" Received: from emailhub01.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.61]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Dec 2010 16:04:42 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.69]) by emailhub01.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.61]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:04:41 -0800 From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: "Fox, Kevin M" , Patrick Angeles CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "Brown, David M JR" , "Taylor, Ronald C" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:04:41 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acum6GiB7w6BPDa9Qom2VCQHANgdsgAApZCw Message-ID: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> In-Reply-To: <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 =20 Hi Kevin, So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the best w= ay to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a parallelized pul= l through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you ask about below is o= n parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Kevin M=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM To: Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Bro= wn, David M JR Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the= Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, >=20 >=20 > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely=20 > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the=20 > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load=20 > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how=20 > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through=20 > your network and finally onto HDFS. >=20 >=20 > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat=20 > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the= hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the had= oop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core swi= tch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, = we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified ex= ample): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data bel= ongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reduci= ng bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin >=20 >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > - Patrick >=20 > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C=20 > wrote: > =20 > Folks, > =20 > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > =20 > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > =20 > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > =20 > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > =20 > - Ron Taylor > =20 > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > =20 > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-2630-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 29 06:32:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8515 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2010 06:32:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2010 06:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 62348 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 06:32:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62159 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 06:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62148 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 06:32:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 06:32:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 06:32:26 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so9550723fxm.35 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:32:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TXrXepWiglW3ToPJfXdWOYh93FwudsEgfpzQxzdoTDg=; b=UVktc0PRtTnO0PdegcpTA1wPyMBGh31Cb2q013iCJiKRryWEqxyhWgQRAnR5Lkda9j 0IBpzoLEKvYqRB1tM5aJYSnyK+e107NrpGIFSqlZq+SsgMQh9NI5KHfoi7jcOnfX1rzW 9FG/mOJweaQoyajPA/aR+y13DDl+5UHEFPomI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uaokLBDy1TFe0G6U8FYhAB7dpNoZUpg8UW6CK4KGbrgyYSHtcfFZcjiA4R9UvrpjY9 51LoZIH4LvbCFMi/HKGKM7kzxA9F8N/kItqoDu3NgVcVN2Y29DHUCC8j6h4BENm9wOV/ dM8Kmn/PIahkGiaIbVTTAQGy494vJyaazi0HI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.110.77 with SMTP id m13mr558691fap.86.1293604326129; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:32:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.9 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:32:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61840.91458.qm@web65503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:32:06 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a4XvLoqfwEJyiRVsLcpsCMR7fRg Message-ID: Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: Cut a hadoop-0.20.0-append release from the tip of branch-0.20-append branch? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris: What you say seems sensible enough but its not what I want (smile). My sense is that for HBase, unless the package we host at hbase.apache.org is called hadoop-0.20.0-append -- so its clear its an untainted bundle made from the tip of the append branch -- then we're only going to confuse; we'll be spending our time quelling queries about the "hbase version" of hadoop. I'm going to pass on trying to offer an append release bundle off the branch-0.20-append branch. For the next HBase (imminent) release, we'll just keep on with telling folks build their own hadoop from the append branch or go get CDH3 (The HBase release after that will be about getting us up on hadoop 0.22). Thanks all, St.Ack On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Chris Douglas wrote= : >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Chris Douglas wr= ote: >> Calling it other than Hadoop would only confuse the situation even >> more; "Trust all your data to fooFS!". =A0It'd also reeks of HDFS 'fork' >> (HBase is not yet up for taking on such a burden). > > Unless I'm missing something, it is a fork. It's a temporary, friendly > fork, but it's what the HBase project has been using and supporting > for months. It hasn't had a label assigned to it, but it's a product > (a feature with a mostly-shared implementation across other forks, at > any rate). > >> I liked my original reading of your suggestion Chris -- even if it was >> perhaps not what you intended -- where HBase would host >> hadoop-0.20-append. =A0Thats not on? > > Your original reading was what I intended. The obstacle to releasing a > variant of Hadoop from the HBase project is the name. I'd be surprised > if TLPs were permitted to release under another project's name, even > if the other endorsed it. If that assumption is not a real constraint, > then I agree that there's no point in calling it something else. -C > From general-return-2631-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 29 21:17:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53197 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2010 21:17:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2010 21:17:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 52145 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:17:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52024 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:17:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52016 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 21:17:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:17:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dean.hiller@broadridge.com designates 64.18.2.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.157] (HELO exprod7og102.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:16:53 +0000 Received: from source ([167.212.2.180]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTRulKw74Bi5yQmVdEorNYCAdA+YjfArT@postini.com; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:16:33 PST Received: from JOSQHUBA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com (josqhuba01 [149.83.60.74]) by mail.broadridge.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBTLGQte5414978; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:16:26 -0500 Received: from DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com ([206.88.42.250]) by JOSQHUBA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:16:26 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:16:22 -0700 Message-ID: <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acum6GiB7w6BPDa9Qom2VCQHANgdsgAApZCwACycgrA= References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> From: "Hiller, Dean (Contractor)" To: , "Fox, Kevin M" , "Patrick Angeles" Cc: , "Brown, David M JR" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2010 21:16:26.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[A75A7B20:01CBA79D] I wonder if having linux mount hdfs would help here so as people put the file on your linux /hdfs directory, it was actually writing to hdfs and not linux ;) (yeah, you still have that one machine bottle neck as the files come in unless that can be clustered too somehow). Just google mounting hdfs from linux....something that sounds pretty cool that we may be using later. =20 Later, Dean -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:05 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR; Taylor, Ronald C Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? =20 Hi Kevin, So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Kevin M=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM To: Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Brown, David M JR Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, >=20 >=20 > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely=20 > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the=20 > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load=20 > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how=20 > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through=20 > your network and finally onto HDFS. >=20 >=20 > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat=20 > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin >=20 >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > - Patrick >=20 > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C=20 > wrote: > =20 > Folks, > =20 > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > =20 > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > =20 > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > =20 > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > =20 > - Ron Taylor > =20 > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > =20 > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the add= ressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reade= r of the = message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of thi= s communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communica= tion in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and = any attachments from your system. =0D From general-return-2632-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 29 21:21:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54011 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2010 21:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2010 21:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 58804 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58646 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58638 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 21:21:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:21:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:21:28 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,246,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35813809" Received: from emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 29 Dec 2010 13:21:06 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.69]) by emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:21:05 -0800 From: "Fox, Kevin M" To: "'Hiller, Dean (Contractor)'" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Patrick Angeles CC: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "Brown, David M JR" Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:21:04 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acum6GiB7w6BPDa9Qom2VCQHANgdsgAApZCwACycgrAAACopMA== Message-ID: <81A22C12505EF7419E792D791BC28B3CFC78FB2C0D@EMAIL05.pnl.gov> References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> In-Reply-To: <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MountableHDFS Under Known Issues: 2. Writes are approximately 33% slower than the DFSClient. TBD how to optim= ize this. see: HADOOP-3805 - try using -obig_writes if on a >2.6.26 kernel= , should perform much better since bigger writes implies less context switc= hing. 3. Reads are ~20-30% slower even with the read buffering. Sounds like just pushing it in would be better. Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Hiller, Dean (Contractor) [mailto:dean.hiller@broadridge.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1:16 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles Cc: user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the= Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? I wonder if having linux mount hdfs would help here so as people put the file on your linux /hdfs directory, it was actually writing to hdfs and not linux ;) (yeah, you still have that one machine bottle neck as the files come in unless that can be clustered too somehow). Just google mounting hdfs from linux....something that sounds pretty cool that we may be using later. =20 Later, Dean -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:05 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR; Taylor, Ronald C Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? =20 Hi Kevin, So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Kevin M=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM To: Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Brown, David M JR Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, >=20 >=20 > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely=20 > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the=20 > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load=20 > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how=20 > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through=20 > your network and finally onto HDFS. >=20 >=20 > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat=20 > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin >=20 >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > - Patrick >=20 > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C=20 > wrote: > =20 > Folks, > =20 > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > =20 > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > =20 > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > =20 > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > =20 > - Ron Taylor > =20 > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > =20 > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addre= ssee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader = of the=20 message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of th= e intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communicati= on in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and an= y attachments from your system. From general-return-2633-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Dec 29 21:29:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55385 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2010 21:29:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Dec 2010 21:29:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 65396 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65279 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2010 21:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65030 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 21:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:29:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dean.hiller@broadridge.com designates 64.18.2.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.215] (HELO exprod7og114.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:29:29 +0000 Received: from source ([167.212.2.180]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTRuoDY+Jd64U6no7r74PwrSBNcqZyBey@postini.com; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:29:09 PST Received: from JOSQHUBA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com (josqhuba01 [149.83.60.74]) by mail.broadridge.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBTLSgJL7721120; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:28:43 -0500 Received: from DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com ([206.88.42.250]) by JOSQHUBA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:28:43 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:28:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0B18@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> In-Reply-To: <81A22C12505EF7419E792D791BC28B3CFC78FB2C0D@EMAIL05.pnl.gov> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acum6GiB7w6BPDa9Qom2VCQHANgdsgAApZCwACycgrAAACopMAAATrjA References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> <81A22C12505EF7419E792D791BC28B3CFC78FB2C0D@EMAIL05.pnl.gov> From: "Hiller, Dean (Contractor)" To: "Fox, Kevin M" , , "Patrick Angeles" Cc: , "Brown, David M JR" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2010 21:28:43.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[5E4A08E0:01CBA79F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks of the info, missed that at the bottom of that page. Dean -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin.fox@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:21 PM To: Hiller, Dean (Contractor); general@hadoop.apache.org; Patrick Angeles Cc: user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MountableHDFS Under Known Issues: 2. Writes are approximately 33% slower than the DFSClient. TBD how to optimize this. see: HADOOP-3805 - try using -obig_writes if on a >2.6.26 kernel, should perform much better since bigger writes implies less context switching. 3. Reads are ~20-30% slower even with the read buffering. Sounds like just pushing it in would be better. Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Hiller, Dean (Contractor) [mailto:dean.hiller@broadridge.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1:16 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles Cc: user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? I wonder if having linux mount hdfs would help here so as people put the file on your linux /hdfs directory, it was actually writing to hdfs and not linux ;) (yeah, you still have that one machine bottle neck as the files come in unless that can be clustered too somehow). Just google mounting hdfs from linux....something that sounds pretty cool that we may be using later. =20 Later, Dean -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:05 PM To: Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR; Taylor, Ronald C Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? =20 Hi Kevin, So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Kevin M=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM To: Patrick Angeles Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Brown, David M JR Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, >=20 >=20 > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely=20 > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the=20 > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load=20 > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how=20 > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through=20 > your network and finally onto HDFS. >=20 >=20 > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat=20 > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin >=20 >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > - Patrick >=20 > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C=20 > wrote: > =20 > Folks, > =20 > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > =20 > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > =20 > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > =20 > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > =20 > - Ron Taylor > =20 > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > =20 > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the=20 message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the add= ressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reade= r of the = message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of = the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of thi= s communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communica= tion in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and = any attachments from your system. =0D From general-return-2643-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 17:12:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17725 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 17:12:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 17:12:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 70594 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 16:02:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70383 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 16:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70374 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2010 16:02:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:02:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:02:24 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so12533372qwh.35 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u+SpjDaHlCf7iaP7RCk1QqaBDHI8bkpWDDZm0MyvrAo=; b=lOvxgEF/mgyK0yrlFl2oz5OSZbhmwHvuOXqBnQyGrtqgCfk/4+DUX6MJv4lVsMUeMW prNUh1myscVjI2/gJh1ODnDgJoiZ0L6+EhbGDQ1sVtBEX8Qm3uYwgVPmogAVVL/0ESyP JZ99Lgq32kNROlpKggjXggzaiUi28TiINTVSk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WQPRt5rVGHBPFUE67nwJ4BxlTqPVMPKVNO6Mhv0EUtUBGhsyS6SqXaVRzJ0c2pHyx2 Aj3Z+5UG+PeEAWW1ZbBOi8bi9Y8L/acs53Ji9yKpvbf5sO7x+gEZ3TdGnjO4Eh0EAH4O Yr2UphkQ35YSbrgXK1Z13zLxeymn1ncLQo8ZM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.67.72 with SMTP id q8mr3987630qai.222.1293811323718; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:02:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:02:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: dfs.datanode.du.pct question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% usage? TIA From general-return-2644-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 17:52:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62241 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 17:52:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 17:52:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 682 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 22:57:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 606 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 598 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:57:09 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so11484191fxm.35 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:56:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8BUbopKnV40GXAIwaI3WB5FfjKlPYp6G4el82bwi8mI=; b=F9O6HQBDjsYUnZELe+X5va/0Jz7VjvF3vLC7vMEtlubhGdZcTzCuFRFcCi6TxyxmdG BojYOqu4fkZtBMUkwpOenw5n25gFCDW561L+y+p5K0lqoZB3InWf3o3Vlw2HbFZzh57W +Z8NZ82FA7emEmcUKNgCOsPExbrP9xTE8sYZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=gchK1Dr5jkf6ZHwYhW/xKqlbUH1xFx2ZW+DtU02j/kYVhwZ3/QyT9u0fvS8ggkiKNY /o5YxaMrbfalo4Cql1oe5ctZEaKCEkUH3QaVRG5w+o3vBuiecchaKhwwo/HcBY/UiPLb ov6/vxh5uR9t+PMsv8DXiK1nAxKaxLxaAQvII= Received: by 10.223.79.68 with SMTP id o4mr646741fak.0.1293836207576; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:56:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:56:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 04:26:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it > possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% > usage? According to the release's code: No. (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not recommended.) -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2645-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 19:15:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52838 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 19:15:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 19:15:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 67099 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2011 05:41:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66784 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2011 05:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66772 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2011 05:41:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:41:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:41:18 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so12785108wye.35 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.63.15 with SMTP id z15mr18274173wec.74.1293860457139; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:40:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:40:37 -0800 (PST) From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:40:37 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DscZFy4B220wNeHv3_I3mBwCucU Message-ID: Subject: Happy New Year, Hadoop! To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Best wishes and warmest regards to everyone who was part of fast-growing Hadoop ecosystem the last year! 2011 promises to be an amazing time for ever increasing Hadoop's popularity, robustness and success! Happy New Year everyone! -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik From general-return-2646-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 19:22:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57737 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 19:22:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 19:22:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 70945 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2011 05:55:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70594 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2011 05:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70586 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2011 05:55:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of maheswaran@ikyaglobal.com does not designate 121.243.47.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.243.47.5] (HELO ikyaglobal.com) (121.243.47.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 05:55:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 25476 invoked by uid 109); 1 Jan 2011 05:52:30 -0000 Received: from 14.99.3.27 by mail (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (perlscan: 1.25st. dmf: ???. Clear:RC:1(14.99.3.27):. Processed in 0.236487 secs); 01 Jan 2011 05:52:30 -0000 Received: from static-27.3.99.14.tataidc.co.in (HELO ikyahp530) (maheswaran@[14.99.3.27]) (envelope-sender ) by ikyaglobal.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Jan 2011 05:52:29 -0000 From: "maheswaran" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Happy New Year, Hadoop! Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:25:21 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcupdiV3c8N/e7EnRTCAQ8/+j2JmagAAjGvQ Content-Language: en-us Thanks for the wishes and wish you the same for the entire HADOOP = Family. Regards, Maheswaran A +91 98403 48330 -----Original Message----- From: cos@boudnik.org [mailto:cos@boudnik.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Boudnik Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:11 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Happy New Year, Hadoop! Best wishes and warmest regards to everyone who was part of fast-growing Hadoop ecosystem the last year! 2011 promises to be an amazing time for ever increasing Hadoop's popularity, robustness and success! Happy New Year everyone! -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik From general-return-2642-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:27:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96661 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:27:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 32654 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 12:09:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32463 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 12:09:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32443 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2010 12:09:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:09:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chenqibj@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.148 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.148] (HELO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:09:36 +0000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.247]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBVC8wnT005664 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:08:58 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oBVC9EEE1802330 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:09:15 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oBVC9ERb025599 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:09:14 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id oBVC9DF2025591 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:09:14 +1100 Subject: Keith is out of office Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Qi BJ Chen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:09:13 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 12/31/2010 20:09:13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBF299DFD1458C8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF299DFD1458C" Content-Disposition: inline --0__=C7BBF299DFD1458C8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF299DFD1458C Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2010-12-31 and will not return until 2011-01-06. --0__=C7BBF299DFD1458C8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF299DFD1458C-- From general-return-2634-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:42:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 492 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:42:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28565 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28213 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63214 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 23:08:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:07:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: Patrick Angeles , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" , "Taylor, Ronald C" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fbd9c98ea48049880857d --90e6ba4fbd9c98ea48049880857d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 if the data is coming off of a single machine then simply running multiple threads on that machine spraying the data into the cluster is likely to be faster than a map-reduce program. The reason is that you can run the spraying process continuously and can tune it to carefully saturate your outbound link toward the cluster. With a map-reduce program it will be very easy to flatten the link. Another issue is that it is easy to push data to the cluster from a local disk rather than to pull it from nodes in the cluster because most network file protocols aren't as efficient as you might like. On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > 2) some way of parallelizing the reads > > So - I will check into network hardware, in regard to (1). But for (2), is > the MapReduce method that I was think of, a way that uses "hadoop fs > -copyFromLocal" in each Mapper, a good way to go at the destination end? I > believe that you were saying that it is indeed OK, but I want to > double-check, since this will be a critical piece of our work flow. > --90e6ba4fbd9c98ea48049880857d-- From general-return-2635-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:54:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2499 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29674 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29593 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75472 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 23:16:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:15:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Patrick Angeles To: Ted Dunning Cc: user@hbase.apache.org, "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" , "Taylor, Ronald C" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636832e8a5d3c57049880a193 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636832e8a5d3c57049880a193 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To add to what Ted says, "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal" assumes that the file is present locally on the datanode. That means the file would have to have been transfered to the node, copied to local disk, and only after that is it written to HDFS, so there's an extra trip to disk that you could have avoided. You might have avoided that using a direct pull from the MapReduce task that writes directly to HDFS. But, as Ted mentions, that is not as efficient as a source-based push and is also more complex. On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > if the data is coming off of a single machine then simply running multiple > threads on that machine spraying the data into the cluster is likely to be > faster than a map-reduce program. The reason is that you can run the > spraying process continuously and can tune it to carefully saturate your > outbound link toward the cluster. With a map-reduce program it will be very > easy to flatten the link. > > Another issue is that it is easy to push data to the cluster from a local > disk rather than to pull it from nodes in the cluster because most network > file protocols aren't as efficient as you might like. > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > >> 2) some way of parallelizing the reads >> >> So - I will check into network hardware, in regard to (1). But for (2), is >> the MapReduce method that I was think of, a way that uses "hadoop fs >> -copyFromLocal" in each Mapper, a good way to go at the destination end? I >> believe that you were saying that it is indeed OK, but I want to >> double-check, since this will be a critical piece of our work flow. >> > > --001636832e8a5d3c57049880a193-- From general-return-2636-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:54:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2579 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:54:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:54:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 31022 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30978 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86456 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 23:29:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,241,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35765936" Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: "Taylor, Ronald C" Cc: "'user@hbase.apache.org'" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" , "Brown, David M JR" , kevin.glass@pnl.gov In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:29:20 -0800 Message-ID: <1293578960.5455.141.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As I understand it, and please correct me if I'm wrong, a map/reduce job has an instance of a FileSystem object on either side. One that the data is read out of on the map side, and one the data is fed into on the reduce side. Can't you run the map reduce job on the storage cluster that stores the archival data, feeding the map side with http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/fs/RawLocalFileSystem.html from the mounted, posix parallel file system, and feed it into the hadoop cluster on the reduce side. That would mean, the network in the middle would only see the reduced data set cross the wire and you could parallelize the data reduction as close to the archive as possible. Thanks, Kevin On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:04 -0800, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed might become a bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > From general-return-2637-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:54:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2692 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:54:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 32409 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32355 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3081 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2010 23:39:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,241,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35766339" Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: Patrick Angeles Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "Taylor, Ronald C" , "Brown, David M JR" In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:39:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, > > > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through > your network and finally onto HDFS. > > > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin > > > Regards, > > > - Patrick > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C > wrote: > > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > > > From general-return-2638-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:54:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2829 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:54:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 33808 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33764 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19526 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 00:06:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,242,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35767312" Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:05:36 -0800 Message-ID: <1293581136.5455.156.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As I understand it, and please correct me if I'm wrong, a map/reduce job has an instance of a FileSystem object on either side. One that the data is read out of on the map side, and one the data is fed into on the reduce side. Can't you run the map reduce job on the storage cluster that stores the archival data, feeding the map side with http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/fs/RawLocalFileSystem.html from the mounted, posix parallel file system, and feed it into the hadoop cluster on the reduce side. That would mean, the network in the middle would only see the reduced data set cross the wire and you could parallelize the data reduction as close to the archive as possible. Thanks, Kevin On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:04 -0800, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed might become a bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > From general-return-2639-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:55:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2963 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:55:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 35662 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35604 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19672 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 00:06:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,242,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="54803483" Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:05:46 -0800 Message-ID: <1293581146.5455.157.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > Ron, > > > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through > your network and finally onto HDFS. > > > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. > We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): a0 --\ /-- h0 a1 --+ +-- h1 a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 a3 --/ \-- h3 I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. Thanks, Kevin > > Regards, > > > - Patrick > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C > wrote: > > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > > > From general-return-2640-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:55:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3054 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:55:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:55:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 37055 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36986 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22451 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 00:11:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,242,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35767460" Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: "Taylor, Ronald C" Cc: Patrick Angeles , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "Brown, David M JR" , kevin.glass@pnl.gov In-Reply-To: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:11:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1293581491.5455.163.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 16:04 -0800, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. > Ron Hi Ron, I think there are merits for both approaches, a depending on the type of data it is. If you only ever need a subset of the data for reprocessing, map/reducing then transfer might be better. If you want all the raw data of a particular set, push transfer may make more sense. So we'd need solutions to both: *parallel map reduce on non hdfs storage cluster, push to hdfs reprocessing cluster. *parallel push data from non hdfs storage cluster, into hdfs reprocessing cluster. Thanks, Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fox, Kevin M > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM > To: Patrick Angeles > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; Brown, David M JR > Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? > > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > > Ron, > > > > > > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely > > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the > > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load > > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how > > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through > > your network and finally onto HDFS. > > > > > > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat > > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. > > > We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to the hadoop storage cluster. > > Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, just a simplified example): > > a0 --\ /-- h0 > a1 --+ +-- h1 > a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 > a3 --/ \-- h3 > > I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly reducing bandwidth. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > - Patrick > > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C > > wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > > nodes. > > > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > > bottleneck. > > > > - Ron Taylor > > > > ___________________________________________ > > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > > 902 Battelle Boulevard > > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > > Richland, WA 99352 USA > > Office: 509-372-6568 > > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > > > > > > > > > From general-return-2641-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 01 20:55:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3178 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2011 20:55:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2011 20:55:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 38611 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38406 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2010 08:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57229 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2010 21:19:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <1293579543.5455.150.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> <7CA0D5FE7FA83048893E9230C1E9C0280B8C0AF0@DNVREMSA01.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:19:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? To: user@hbase.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, "Fox, Kevin M" , Patrick Angeles , "Brown, David M JR" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30050ec05687570498931fcd --20cf30050ec05687570498931fcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The problem there is that HDFS isn't a first class file system. That means that the nice and easy ways of mounting will lead to problems (notably NFS which maintains no state will require random write capabilities). On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Hiller, Dean (Contractor) < dean.hiller@broadridge.com> wrote: > I wonder if having linux mount hdfs would help here so as people put the > file on your linux /hdfs directory, it was actually writing to hdfs and > not linux ;) (yeah, you still have that one machine bottle neck as the > files come in unless that can be clustered too somehow). Just google > mounting hdfs from linux....something that sounds pretty cool that we > may be using later. > > Later, > Dean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:05 PM > To: Fox, Kevin M; Patrick Angeles > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Brown, David M JR; > Taylor, Ronald C > Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into > the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? > > > Hi Kevin, > > So - from what Patrick and Ted are saying it sounds like we want the > best way to parallelize a source-based push, rather than doing a > parallelized pull through a MapReduce program. And I see that what you > ask about below is on parallelizing a push, so we are on the same page. > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fox, Kevin M > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:39 PM > To: Patrick Angeles > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org; Taylor, Ronald C; > Brown, David M JR > Subject: Re: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into > the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? > > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 14:26 -0800, Patrick Angeles wrote: > > Ron, > > > > > > While MapReduce can help to parallelize the load effort, your likely > > bottleneck is the source system (where the files come from). If the > > files are coming from a single server, then parallelizing the load > > won't gain you much past a certain point. You have to figure in how > > fast you can read the file(s) off disk(s) and push the bits through > > your network and finally onto HDFS. > > > > > > The best scenario is if you can parallelize the reads and have a fat > > network pipe (10GbE or more) going into your Hadoop cluster. > > > We have a way to parallelize a push from the archive storage cluster to > the hadoop storage cluster. > > Is there a way to target a particular storage node with a push into the > hadoop file system? The hadoop cluster nodes are 1gig attached to its > core switch and we have a 10 gig uplink to the core from the storage > archive. Say, we have 4 nodes in each storage cluster (we have more, > just a simplified example): > > a0 --\ /-- h0 > a1 --+ +-- h1 > a2 --+ (A switch) -10gige- (h switch) +-- h2 > a3 --/ \-- h3 > > I want to be able to have a0 talk to h0 and not have h0 decide the data > belongs on h3, slowing down a3's ability to write data into h3, greatly > reducing bandwidth. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > - Patrick > > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Taylor, Ronald C > > wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis > > onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. > > Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. > > So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as > > fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. > > Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in > > parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So > > my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files > > (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that > > listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using > > "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with > > all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the > > nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the > > nodes. > > > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there > > better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated > > upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in > > this area, since we believe upload speed might become a > > bottleneck. > > > > - Ron Taylor > > > > ___________________________________________ > > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > > 902 Battelle Boulevard > > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > > Richland, WA 99352 USA > > Office: 509-372-6568 > > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > > > > > > > > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the > addressee and > may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader > of the > message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of > the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in > error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and > any > attachments from your system. > > --20cf30050ec05687570498931fcd-- From general-return-3213-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 08:20:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79553 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 08:20:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 08:20:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 74928 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74160 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74152 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 08:20:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:20:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:19:56 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2740412qwj.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.200.105 with SMTP id ev41mr3139348qcb.0.1301645975157; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:19:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.142.15 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:19:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:19:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ef0437f8fb9f049fd711f2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ef0437f8fb9f049fd711f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Hadoop Community, Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next step and further separate the existing projects. I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Map" and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease out the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist today, to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should speed releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given high priority. Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new projects concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be able to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community regarding "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has largely stagnated of late. If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, then we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My gut instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects, and simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the details of what exactly these project splits mean later. Please let me know what you think. Best, Aaron --001636ef0437f8fb9f049fd711f2-- From general-return-3214-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 08:26:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1212 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 08:26:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 08:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 86099 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85964 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85956 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 08:26:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:26:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:26:03 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so4736547iwr.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.75.66 with SMTP id z2mr4679982icj.235.1301646342537; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.220.194 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:25:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:25:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e84fedec331049fd7279c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e84fedec331049fd7279c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +4.01. This is a terrific idea. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > Hello Hadoop Community, > > Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, > MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next > step and further separate the existing projects. > > I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Map" > and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease > out > the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist today, > to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should speed > releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or > reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given > high > priority. > > Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a > great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new projects > concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be able > to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, > given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community > regarding > "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has largely > stagnated of late. > > If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, then > we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My > gut > instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects, > and > simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the > details of what exactly these project splits mean later. > > Please let me know what you think. > > Best, > Aaron > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba6e84fedec331049fd7279c-- From general-return-3215-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 08:57:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93231 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 08:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 08:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22077 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:57:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21999 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 08:57:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21991 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 08:57:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:57:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:57:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 93170 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 08:57:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:57:01 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so4755372iym.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.150.205 with SMTP id z13mr3614888ibv.177.1301648220710; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.59.135 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:57:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to be written). Of course, not all of these subprojects will succeed. When one fails (or is too slow with its project reports), the project scheduler will be responsible for respawning it in the Incubator. The project scheduler will, of course, be pluggable. -C On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > Hello Hadoop Community, > > Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, > MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next > step and further separate the existing projects. > > I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Map" > and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease out > the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist today, > to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should speed > releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or > reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given high > priority. > > Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a > great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new projects > concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be able > to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, > given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community regarding > "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has largely > stagnated of late. > > If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, then > we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My gut > instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects, and > simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the > details of what exactly these project splits mean later. > > Please let me know what you think. > > Best, > Aaron > From general-return-3216-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 15:27:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91534 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 15:27:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 15:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27219 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 15:27:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27146 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 15:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27136 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 15:27:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:27:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.94 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.94] (HELO asmtpout019.mac.com) (17.148.16.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:27:46 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.31] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp019.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LIZ002ZLC8W3N10@asmtp019.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-01_07:2011-04-01,2011-04-01,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=2 spamscore=2 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104010057 Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:26:57 -0700 Message-id: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -1+2. This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop for our build and test infrastructure. That would be awesome! n. On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to > partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should > explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project > should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition > the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a > subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically > accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should > combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to > be written). > > Of course, not all of these subprojects will succeed. When one fails > (or is too slow with its project reports), the project scheduler will > be responsible for respawning it in the Incubator. > > The project scheduler will, of course, be pluggable. -C > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: >> Hello Hadoop Community, >> >> Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, >> MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next >> step and further separate the existing projects. >> >> I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Map" >> and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease out >> the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist today, >> to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should speed >> releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or >> reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given high >> priority. >> >> Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a >> great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new projects >> concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be able >> to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, >> given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community regarding >> "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has largely >> stagnated of late. >> >> If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, then >> we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My gut >> instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects, and >> simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the >> details of what exactly these project splits mean later. >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> >> Best, >> Aaron >> From general-return-3217-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 16:13:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48470 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 16:13:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 16:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17901 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 16:13:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17850 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 16:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17842 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 16:13:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:13:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of patrickangeles@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:13:34 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5318406iwr.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GhX+5bF0tP4w1nfrl2QU1tfQ58oC2INWaU1LkDkMWuw=; b=bq2T3UMqu28AoWd4IbhokyvK3qStmVdFOA6axPdF5d/2swIOdNIEAZXwCyJ0Yddvsl ODXVprRdrKz/WbRiQ+JvKEs2v9A1OpFmff2TpdMsMLOUNdXZy3AXS6qLolmgEwg9Txyf duW2W7LWEfdyu7auSqjAsNPry3XsMU51/wVNc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=MOt80yWE9sDg04mTNlALxvgTVhcaK9bI0J0UodyRbPcymIgmgoEXKmhacV28Z2b+Hg LcMWVWZSlJ1L2TpTbs1y+k86IJQQhu0TlWWDWTTmUGnoBBX4TBHkWgmxbyEA/+pDS8Fz IXY+kcPql05XcBgYrSthro+DJAjz6VMx8ZX4s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.136.138 with SMTP id u10mr1639466ict.104.1301674393208; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: patrickangeles@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.2.82 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> References: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:13:13 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fd6Vjs7NK3a1UfViK-nPsJB-fTk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) From: Patrick Angeles To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Nigel Daley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba1eff48d20901049fddaf26 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba1eff48d20901049fddaf26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 This will allow Hadoop to better compete with GoDaddy's "Hadoop Killer" skunkworks project. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > -1+2. This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop for > our build and test infrastructure. That would be awesome! > > n. > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to > > partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should > > explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project > > should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition > > the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a > > subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically > > accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should > > combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to > > be written). > > > > Of course, not all of these subprojects will succeed. When one fails > > (or is too slow with its project reports), the project scheduler will > > be responsible for respawning it in the Incubator. > > > > The project scheduler will, of course, be pluggable. -C > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > >> Hello Hadoop Community, > >> > >> Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, > >> MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the > next > >> step and further separate the existing projects. > >> > >> I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate > "Map" > >> and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease > out > >> the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist > today, > >> to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should > speed > >> releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or > >> reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given > high > >> priority. > >> > >> Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a > >> great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new > projects > >> concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be > able > >> to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, > >> given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community > regarding > >> "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has > largely > >> stagnated of late. > >> > >> If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, > then > >> we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My > gut > >> instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects, > and > >> simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the > >> details of what exactly these project splits mean later. > >> > >> Please let me know what you think. > >> > >> Best, > >> Aaron > >> > > --90e6ba1eff48d20901049fddaf26-- From general-return-3218-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 17:07:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49220 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 17:07:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 17:07:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 34890 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 17:07:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34843 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 17:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34835 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 17:07:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:07:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.109] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:07:24 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p31H6xfr001531 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:07:02 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:07:00 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:06:51 -0700 Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) Thread-Topic: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) Thread-Index: AcvwjzYIw9lpNvzvTmCVhsoVnU62ow== Message-ID: <2305C49F-5920-4837-8A38-31EB1023955A@jpl.nasa.gov> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org LOL@Chris!!! On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to > partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should > explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project > should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition > the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a > subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically > accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should > combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to > be written). >=20 > Of course, not all of these subprojects will succeed. When one fails > (or is too slow with its project reports), the project scheduler will > be responsible for respawning it in the Incubator. >=20 > The project scheduler will, of course, be pluggable. -C >=20 > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: >> Hello Hadoop Community, >>=20 >> Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, >> MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the nex= t >> step and further separate the existing projects. >>=20 >> I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Map= " >> and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to tease= out >> the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist toda= y, >> to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should sp= eed >> releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or >> reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given = high >> priority. >>=20 >> Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a >> great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new project= s >> concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be a= ble >> to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me, >> given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community regar= ding >> "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has large= ly >> stagnated of late. >>=20 >> If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, th= en >> we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. My= gut >> instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects,= and >> simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the >> details of what exactly these project splits mean later. >>=20 >> Please let me know what you think. >>=20 >> Best, >> Aaron >>=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3219-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 18:03:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32755 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 18:03:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 18:03:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 21908 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:03:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21833 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:03:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81987 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 17:38:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=O3Ws5pG5DvFzOUDqWRD3WN0Fa1DfQN1OPMwTON/AbHLFPMVA6KpAKlx0 RY38Te8EmdwZxly0AvhFBO++DBbTPApxpAGlwUWHkWxxOG6bKptMsslMV iplabzH+v1MMLbz; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1301679497; x=1333215497; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Proposal:=20Further=20Project=20Split(s )|Date:=20Fri,=201=20Apr=202011=2017:40:32=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<5B2C46534FDF8F4293A617DAD471BC49@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A =20; bh=i3blXvL/Qyz/vWu5m2pp5ukYb+RV9EMnD3UObLsVtwk=; b=bB2RsqyFqpnLwJTm69hwv1bL/YaxZbepIzdU1UJEBY+zxKHmniIra1oG OvAiLRLYx007bGeXopAyenW0FJZcqEFcP6f+dsmYv6NDlIy4aVrZVx+yf TN5Uy5TP9+c1T/Y; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,283,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="21753120" From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) Thread-Topic: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) Thread-Index: AQHL8EX7jHElUjWn+kiKhYleqOdIq5RJKlIAgACRjoA= Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:40:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5B2C46534FDF8F4293A617DAD471BC49@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to > partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should > explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project > should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition > the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a > subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically > accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should > combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to > be written). -1, until it supports eclipse. From general-return-3220-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 18:30:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3555 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 18:30:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 18:30:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 59301 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59181 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59173 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 18:30:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:30:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.93.165.11] (HELO cse-mail.unl.edu) (129.93.165.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:30:10 +0000 Received: from cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu (cse-barracuda.unl.edu [129.93.164.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse-mail.unl.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p31ITjYf024646 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:29:50 -0500 (CDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1301682584-4b5c35b48ff1-IjwG86 Received: from cse.unl.edu (cse.unl.edu [129.93.165.2]) by cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu with ESMTP id QNRrSxc9n9Ij6eGg for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:29:44 -0500 (CDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bbockelm@cse.unl.edu X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 129.93.165.2 Received: from pcp088890pcs.unl.edu (pcp088890pcs.unl.edu [129.93.158.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse.unl.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p31ITiO4010352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:29:44 -0500 From: Brian Bockelman X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 129.93.158.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-447--894646415; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:29:44 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) In-Reply-To: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Barracuda-Connect: cse.unl.edu[129.93.165.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1301682584 X-Barracuda-URL: http://cse-barracuda.unl.edu:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at cse-mail X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.59622 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (cse-mail.unl.edu [129.93.165.11]); Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:29:50 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean --Apple-Mail-447--894646415 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > >> Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to >> partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should >> explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project >> should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition >> the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a >> subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically >> accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should >> combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to >> be written). > > > -1, until it supports eclipse. > -1, until it supports emacs --Apple-Mail-447--894646415 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIIKDCCA/gw ggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDESMBAGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAwMDBaFw0xMzAxMjUw ODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEg MB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYjYaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKC FciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3KlwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdL VG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0 yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4Vd Gy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNlaroPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3 rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4E FgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeow DwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLm ph5DBghZUVF8Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4v tQO1KDxgZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3Qghgk FIhmE1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCgwggMQoAMC AQICAwCvNzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPy LGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQD Ew1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDUyNDE4MTg0OVoXDTExMDUyNDE4MTg0OVowYTETMBEGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUx HzAdBgNVBAMTFkJyaWFuIEJvY2tlbG1hbiA1MDQzMDcwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAw ggEKAoIBAQCwiNKRMFRMWG+AJyo/G5bYisPndrH+44JqRHdxDzMaQP59gxrBO2koRwg/13gINe3e J8QL6bX4ANz/y1uglsytmoJwK5J9fxNYgJgbja83kO0j0HNL6oIyBhGStluaNTbiHrk8GA95M9VR XRqpYiwKvT1F0KS2r7sZ+PWevbAek787eTqg51yuvUUlIBPgTm1kV3vZs21oeIZUuw7wPGXBKN49 XqIDsamUIqiFARwPgqKR9eo6itlYy2NrHo0hHLXew37rEOcKv/0g4pI4J/y4+1qB7fN3nMkIMack FWfAQTngcnH/JpKmh8fmXdkeVv8EKYUXIgkUI5pb+Ak105olAgMBAAGjgeAwgd0wEQYJYIZIAYb4 QgEBBAQDAgWgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DA2BgNVHSAELzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqG SIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1UdHwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9l Z3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4LmNybDAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRiYm9ja2VsbUBjc2Uu dW5sLmVkdTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBTKGR0Sjm6kOF1C1DEOCNvZjRcNXTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOC AQEAlQSD+8Cvb0GxWqD4xhXd8Sl5MJRr1uJxMeGoMA4RZAJuyvVlBUx8v5moqY0XHMfNI+FulyMx wgOoNfvF3dluz3J4C/u5NvzfNqikLj++sL4XDaZoxSHLo9cJxVTcM15Gogct+kvIF1+msEsqLlNR /lqUVE/o8ANdD6PVx/044f/Dzi6s+6jZmBz/vWPI77ymT1EHaAkaHDqoNIlItPQrAHdkJWY67v1z s6mDrKaspF/2ThDdYax208o1oLFd8wY8kQUdTBlMmUAbchQnjOC9vH17w6meDc8VxD+pEL3vAiG2 JN2vzQ3IJCYTCTmagUyiLWHFEudH8Brn43NY0/HwKTGCAv0wggL5AgEBMHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT 8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFi MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTExMDQwMTE4Mjk0NFow IwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFDjel99x2uZrfuDiTrTtPtO2dkunMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTET MBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MIGBBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERP RUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3Jp ZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAEUYdgWEAyJQURu7+ZqFXzTAka2Zo8r/k5me 5BRekF7WmfR8Qf+24hqH+lm50CVTwcLAHZSo8otr8Q39DW/VsqAj6VKJbuQZTzOFzZ7jGpvgYAQF CmwSRPYRLhApY3yk/0iu8209nZ6EiANMZ1rojSNccILn20gbGuos85jq4yS6h4J5Rcj/+rhL1PQ6 7YkYAlCSNwj6eAWC3c/YHOCAnRlbSNwEMkol73pNoVNcmalVROZBtCfWnzqP5Sy/goixZLhskKI+ LZ2mTt7swDa6PuJLi7MdN1/HMGo3NhVU8Gpm91l6KuI/1uKUBYWW+4NRrNot3KpX5syQ2bTE7CIp fQEAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-447--894646415-- From general-return-3221-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 18:36:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53207 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 18:36:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 18:36:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 71231 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:36:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71165 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71157 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 18:36:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:36:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:36:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 49861 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 18:35:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:35:45 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so4913490wyb.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.220.194 with SMTP id o44mr1131196wep.105.1301682943386; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.153.196 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:35:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:35:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Brian Bockelman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Brilliant idea! >> On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> >>> Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to >>> partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should >>> explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project >>> should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition >>> the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a >>> subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically >>> accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should >>> combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to >>> be written). >> >> >> -1, until it supports eclipse. >> > > -1, until it supports emacs -- thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar From general-return-3222-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 18:37:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53984 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 18:37:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 18:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 74436 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:37:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74375 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:37:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74367 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 18:37:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:37:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aaa@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:37:41 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so4544615vws.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.0.205 with SMTP id 13mr5717016vdg.58.1301683040599; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.160.68 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> References: <1A2A2DF1-E442-418D-A6A4-AC214C36F213@linkedin.com> From: Amr Awadallah Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:30:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Allen Wittenauer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf304346e43ec077049fdfb395 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf304346e43ec077049fdfb395 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Strong -1 from me, this *idiotic* since we first need to split the NN and DN into separate projects. -- amr On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to > > partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should > > explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project > > should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition > > the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a > > subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically > > accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should > > combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to > > be written). > > > -1, until it supports eclipse. > > > --20cf304346e43ec077049fdfb395-- From general-return-3223-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 18:42:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55355 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 18:42:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 18:42:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 84666 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:42:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84608 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 18:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84583 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 18:42:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:42:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.178] (HELO mail-px0-f178.google.com) (209.85.212.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:42:34 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so1348650pxi.37 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.142.4 with SMTP id p4mr3560267wfd.43.1301683334055; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.44.35 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> References: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:41:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d6P3_8JD1TLevqRK-GLnTGDY_2U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 08:26, Nigel Daley wrote: > -1+2. =A0This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop f= or our build and test infrastructure. =A0That would be awesome! Has anyone checked a calendar lately? > On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > >> Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to >> partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should >> explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project >> should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition >> the Hadoop subprojects, possibly running a second version of a >> subproject in parallel. Downstream subprojects and TLPs automatically >> accept whichever releases first as a dependency. Implementation should >> combine ant, ivy, maven, and at least one legacy Hadoop build tool (to >> be written). >> >> Of course, not all of these subprojects will succeed. When one fails >> (or is too slow with its project reports), the project scheduler will >> be responsible for respawning it in the Incubator. >> >> The project scheduler will, of course, be pluggable. -C >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: >>> Hello Hadoop Community, >>> >>> Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS= , >>> MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the ne= xt >>> step and further separate the existing projects. >>> >>> I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate "Ma= p" >>> and "Reduce" sub-projects. This will provide us the opportunity to teas= e out >>> the complex interdependencies between "map" and "reduce" that exist tod= ay, >>> to encourage us to write more modular and isolated code, which should s= peed >>> releases. This will also aid our users who exclusively run map-only or >>> reduce-only jobs. These are important use-cases, and so should be given= high >>> priority. >>> >>> Given that these two portions of the existing MapReduce project share a >>> great deal of code, we will likely need to release these two new projec= ts >>> concurrently at first, but the eventual goal should certainly be to be = able >>> to release "Map" and "Reduce" independently. This seems intuitive to me= , >>> given the remarkable recent advancements in the academic community rega= rding >>> "reduce," while the research coming out of the "map" academics has larg= ely >>> stagnated of late. >>> >>> If this proposal is accepted, and it has the success I think it will, t= hen >>> we should strongly consider splitting the other two projects as well. M= y gut >>> instinct is that we should split "HDFS" into "HD" and "FS" sub-projects= , and >>> simply rename the "Common" project to "C'Mon." We can think about the >>> details of what exactly these project splits mean later. >>> >>> Please let me know what you think. >>> >>> Best, >>> Aaron >>> > > From general-return-3224-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 19:35:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48702 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 19:35:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 19:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 53544 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 19:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53500 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 19:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53492 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 19:35:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:35:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:35:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 44897 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 19:35:04 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.100.72]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:35:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:35:00 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <717BAFAB-5D9E-4462-9414-9A7F553748BE@apache.org> References: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 08:26, Nigel Daley wrote: >> -1+2. This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop = for our build and test infrastructure. That would be awesome! >=20 > Has anyone checked a calendar lately? No. My calendar application's map tasks are stuck behind our = PYMK workflow. From general-return-3225-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 01 19:46:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68764 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 19:46:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 19:46:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 68388 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 19:46:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68338 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2011 19:46:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68330 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2011 19:46:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:46:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:46:45 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1059603pzk.35 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.44.13 with SMTP id r13mr3476224wfr.328.1301687185060; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.44.35 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:46:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <717BAFAB-5D9E-4462-9414-9A7F553748BE@apache.org> References: <57B22EAA-4A53-46CF-AD73-51D251F72E6E@mac.com> <717BAFAB-5D9E-4462-9414-9A7F553748BE@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:46:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hCOuQjo-oI1DPtiskceCUGCAkVM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Allen Wittenauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And I tend to believe to all sort of stuff on this particular day because this happens to be my birthday ;( On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:35, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 08:26, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> -1+2. =A0This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop= for our build and test infrastructure. =A0That would be awesome! >> >> Has anyone checked a calendar lately? > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0No. =A0My calendar application's map tasks are stuck behin= d our PYMK workflow. > > From general-return-3226-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 04 19:20:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26867 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2011 19:20:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2011 19:20:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13117 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2011 19:20:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13030 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2011 19:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13022 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2011 19:20:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:20:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:20:08 +0000 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so2143333wwk.5 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.1.151 with SMTP id 23mr4409783wbf.175.1301944788156; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.129.141 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:19:27 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022159751aa9d82fe04a01ca40f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022159751aa9d82fe04a01ca40f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Could those of you who -1ed the removal of HDFS Proxy please look into the test that has been failing our Hudson build for the last several months: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1666 It is one thing to say that we "should" maintain a piece of code, but it's another to actually maintain it. In my mind, part of maintaining a project involves addressing consistent test failures as high priority items. -Todd On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > For closure, this vote fails due to a couple binding -1 votes. > > Nige > > On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > > > Hi Bernd, > > > > Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but > Hadoop is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and > cluster sizes. > > > > There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People > select Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / problem > grows, Hadoop can grow with it. > > > > --- > > E14 - via iPhone > > > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" < > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: > >>> Hi Bernd. > >>> > >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > >>>> > >>>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache > >>>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. > >>>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in > >>>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. > >>> > >>> This has been the situation in the past, > >>> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. > >>> > >>> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main > code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 > branch, > >>> and their recent commits to trunk. > >>> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and > sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your > concerns. > >>> > >>> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see > the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in > MAPREDUCE-279. > >>> > >>> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand > there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. > >> > >> I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. > >> Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think > >> that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into > >> the right direction. > >> > >>>> This is open source development upside down. > >>>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code > >>>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every > >>>> line of code changed. > >>>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP > clearance process. > >>>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open > >>>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. > >>>> > >>>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. > >>>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained > here. > >>>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. > >>>> Release branches stagnate. > >>> > >>> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being > extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. > >>> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least > 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for > someone to verify. > >> > >> It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get > >> there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this > >> size. > >> > >>>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. > >>>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. > >>>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate > doors. > >>>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( > >>>> > http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ > >>>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. > >>>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. > >>>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is > >>>> an improvement. > >>>> > >>>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from > >>>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer > >>>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. > >>>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, > >>>> well, so be it. > >>> > >>>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high > >>>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then > >>>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized > >>>> cluster instead. > >>> > >>> > >>> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there > who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to > see hadoop become something that only runs well on > >>> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. > >> > >> But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. > >> > >> Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase > >> into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized > >> clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month > >> time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open > >> source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without > >> becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on > >> the low-end and medium sized users. > >> > >> I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end > >> users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* > >> obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and > >> developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't > >> need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, > >> they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. > >> All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't > >> have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. > >> > >> Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to > >> the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big > >> companies either. > >> Focus on all the users. > >> > >> Bernd > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0022159751aa9d82fe04a01ca40f-- From general-return-3227-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 05 20:01:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90738 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 20:01:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 20:01:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30569 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 20:01:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30485 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 20:01:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30477 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 20:01:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:01:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:01:13 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so434290pve.35 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:00:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=A3vf6ccBRudTYB1aX8L/xhsNNTKfLVHhg+5XTu9YYTo=; b=HR4YlQvj0QyBwwGRpyXwkqYj8OcQ1VthRHGuEe8vvQH/gsQ6XYhRP9X3uVurcX7jCO YXCUeA0FBJ8vjXQgxb5GyT8voupznt78jpo5tElaWtoyYq6HKzcqpwRvBGv/7RkDPKMI FRqAtCasdLxBi8bwJaMQ/nz4zPSV9oQB37j0Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=pSDUJoaZ1sz9KaReOWlCjN0e0HHIgOxUgMSgTkow6kJMZubB2c+B2cGztAnZEl4L47 spU023Wl2X31MKR5edEHM4Gg105KTJfd0320hHBvuMxQbeqQME1eE0x3im9WPDbCpEY+ LGbstpskMJt6AVrQTRxRZQnYz1GFNw8/VZgiM= Received: by 10.142.233.15 with SMTP id f15mr57157wfh.394.1302033653148; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:00:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.47.68 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:00:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:00:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm not currently planning on doing a 0.21.1 release. I agree with Todd that it would be better to spend time getting 0.22 ready for a release. Cheers, Tom On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Some recent discussion on HDFS-1786 has raised an interesting question: does > anyone plan on maintaining the 0.21 branch and eventually releasing an > 0.21.1? Should we bother to commit bug fixes to this branch? > > It seems to me that our time would be better spent getting 0.22 and trunk > back to a green state so we can talk about releasing them, rather than > applying patches to a branch with no releases planned. > > Of course a decision now doesn't preclude anyone from stepping up later, > backporting patches to 0.21, and releasing an 0.21.1. > > Thanks > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-3228-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 06 20:19:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56182 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2011 20:19:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2011 20:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 18279 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 20:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17877 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 20:18:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17793 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2011 20:18:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:18:39 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so1043375pve.35 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.76.16 with SMTP id y16mr47277wfa.157.1302121098149; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.68.52.97 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:17:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LHUTyWKSFTgO78JKXPBBgWRMfGg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have submitted for enabling Sonar analysis on HDFS code. Would appreciate if someone takes a look so we can move forward with it (HDFS-1741). -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:30, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have looked around Apache's Sonar server and it seems to be > sufficient to just have a correct pom.xml in place. I have opened > =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1741 > Will attend to it shortly. > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:06, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> Hi Ian. >> >> yes, Sonar needs to have a pom'ed project. In case of an ant build >> such a pom can be created to 'wrap' around build.xml and is usually >> quite simple to manufacture. I have done it in the past for some HDFS >> experiments without much of a hassle. >> >> Here's the example: >> =A0http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Analyse+with+Maven >> in "Analyze projects which are not built with Maven" section. >> >> There's one more caveat though: handling of unit tests reports. It can >> be done with some new features Sonar has. See here: >> =A0http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/ant/ >> >> I can quickly provide a working fixture to add say HDFS into Sonar as >> a starter. Pl. let me know where it needs to be put (perhaps a JIRA >> with a patch would do to?). >> >> Thanks for looking into this, >> =A0Cos >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 06:10, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> Hi Cos. >>> apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. >>> I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. >>> >>> On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> Ian, >>>> >>>> Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late >>>> 2009, I believe. =A0I had asked =A0INFRA folks on a few occasions abou= t >>>> adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything >>>> back. >>>> >>>> I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen even= tually. >>>> -- >>>> =A0 Thanks in advance, >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>> I just discovered this Apache site, >>>>> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it l= ooks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>>>> >>>>> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put t= he hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Ian >>>>> -- >>>>> Ian Holsman >>>>> Ian@Holsman.net >>>>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>>>> >>>>> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > From general-return-3229-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 07 20:21:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88470 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2011 20:21:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2011 20:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 1941 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 20:21:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1813 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 20:21:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25916 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2011 17:44:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302198205; bh=w+eKsQcGSouHJG55RVY/3KOqP2Ekp5cfa8NJjh6fBaA=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=TDxi0wEAw1Jc1FrSOK3WfFSqAz7nMGZy+W6XJwvS7QBRkg3RSZomoqLAhzKBHA721 8SoCkLbcap2HSg3rl//h1I92ydP5h89uKgmfeqljGGw96z/awsvFVbRI1pbCY94HmV FZRcOUYpLhPpxf6W1thppHNovvzsKvxi/21TWS5M= From: Avik Dey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:43:23 -0700 Subject: [hadoop] Hadoop Summit 2011 by Yahoo!: June 29th, Santa Clara Convention Center. Register and submit abstract for presentation: www.hadoopsummit.org Thread-Topic: [hadoop] Hadoop Summit 2011 by Yahoo!: June 29th, Santa Clara Convention Center. Register and submit abstract for presentation: www.hadoopsummit.org Thread-Index: Acv00YctyjaYKtraRSmrGT2TejdLtw== Message-ID: <2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330982C0E5D@SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330982C0E5DSP1EX07VS02ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330982C0E5DSP1EX07VS02ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Yahoo! is proud to host the 4th annual Hadoop Summit 2011: June 29th, Santa= Clara Convention Center, California. Registration and Call for Presentations are now open at: http://www.hadoops= ummit.org This year, we have less keynotes and more tech talks, even in the morning s= ession. The afternoon session is tech talks only, followed by a panel discu= ssion, and wrapping up with an evening reception. Details to be posted soon= . For the afternoon session we still have three tracks. However, based on int= erest from the community we have tuned their focus a bit. The three tracks now are: * Community: Presentations and discussions about Hadoop roadmap, co= ntribution and best practices. * Operations and Management: Presentations and discussions about op= erations and management of Hadoop clusters and best practices. * Applications and Research: Case studies about innovative applicat= ions and Hadoop technologies based research studies. This is a terrific opportunity for you to share your experience with thousa= nds of Hadoop users by submitting a session abstract for one of the tracks= above. Submission deadline is May 6th, here is the URL to submit your abstract: http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=3Dhs-2011 Track Co-Chairs this year who will be reviewing your abstracts are: * Andreas Neumann - Yahoo! * Benjamin Reed - Yahoo! * Dhruba Borthakur - Facebook * Michael Stack - StumbleUpon * Milind Bhandarkar - Linkedin * Owen O'Malley - Yahoo! With a great, diverse team of track co-chairs, we are looking forward to ev= en more interesting presentations and discussions this year! Register now, space is limited! Looking forward to meeting you at the Summit. Avik --_000_2931D8EDF4B12743B93584669F76353330982C0E5DSP1EX07VS02ds_-- From general-return-3230-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 07 22:54:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6027 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2011 22:54:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2011 22:54:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 42736 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 22:54:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42696 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 22:54:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42687 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2011 22:54:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:54:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:54:07 +0000 Received: from l2tp-8-240.corp.yahoo.com (l2tp-8-240.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.8.240]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p37MqixH040056 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302216765; bh=rBfUPF8k3rzc+pMxDZJIxwQG5PkW/RfytJExQymYC2c=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=auJThgfRl847XfeRjYH8mUDV3rmFVuE4kcdj48jRiRpZnS8HZKRjECIl19bn5mmiJ xTpRrJh8KSFbJSBIRClme/uXaPY/s4PJeA1eMFcjo2h6M1Ijg5sziuYEvAiKj7YGBe /UqOTPDaTjfY9hC1WNgsYqJ+OkRWjQjp4GMg4onk= Message-Id: <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-25--360465881 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:52:44 -0700 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-25--360465881 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > As the final installment in this process, I've started a discussion on > us contributing a re-factor of Map-Reduce in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279 > . Hi Folks, We wanted to share our thoughts around the co-development of the NextGen MapReduce branch (Jira MR-279), maintaining the branch-0.20- security and merging the work on the security branch with trunk. We've concluded that it does not make sense for us to port a very small subset of the work from the branch-0.20-security to the Hadoop mainline. The JIRAs we don't plan to port all effect areas of the mainline that are going to be replaced by work in the NextGen MapReduce branch (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/mapreduce/branches/MR-279/ ). We've been working on the NextGen MapReduce branch (MAPREDUCE-279) within Apache for a while now and are excited about it's progress. We think that this branch will be a huge improvement in scalability, performance and functionality. We are now confident that we can get it ready for release in in the next few months. We believe that the next major release of Apache Hadoop we will test at Yahoo will include the work in this branch and we are committed to merging the NextGen branch into the mainline after the PMC approves the merge. Meanwhile, we have continued to find and fix bugs on branch-0.20- security and have been working to port that work into the Hadoop mainline. Most of this work is done and we've also brought all the patches in from our github branch into apache subversion, so that it is easy for everyone to see the work remaining. What we've found is that some of the work in branch-0.20-security is in code sections that have been completely replaced / refactored in the NextGen MapReduce branch. Since we are committed to the NextGen branch, we don't think there is any upside in porting this code into portions of mainline we expect to discard. All of these JIRAs will be fixed in the NextGen MapReduce branch and through there ultimately in trunk (assuming the PMC approves the merge). So at this point it is our intent to not port the JIRAs listed above to trunk, but to wait until we merge NextGen into trunk to resolve these issues there. If you are interested in seeing these issues ported to mainline, let us know. We are happy to help review your patches and explain context to anyone who is interested in doing this work. Arun and Eric --Apple-Mail-25--360465881-- From general-return-3231-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 07 23:23:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86835 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2011 23:23:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2011 23:23:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 61816 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 23:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61745 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2011 23:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61736 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2011 23:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 23:23:32 +0000 Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1260357ewy.35 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.157 with SMTP id p29mr672176eeb.245.1302218592191; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:23:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.119.199 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 16:22:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 16:22:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Arun C Murthy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e656850e9b84d804a05c64f4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e656850e9b84d804a05c64f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there a list available of which patches you've made this decision about? I'm curious, for example, about MAPREDUCE-2178 -- as of today, the MR security in trunk has a serious vulnerability. Do we plan on fixing it, or will the answer be that, if anyone needs security, they must update to "MR Next Gen"? -Todd On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> >> As the final installment in this process, I've started a discussion on >> us contributing a re-factor of Map-Reduce in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279 >> . >> > > > > Hi Folks, > > We wanted to share our thoughts around the co-development of the NextGen > MapReduce branch (Jira MR-279), maintaining the branch-0.20-security and > merging the work on the security branch with trunk. We've concluded that it > does not make sense for us to port a very small subset of the work from the > branch-0.20-security to the Hadoop mainline. The JIRAs we don't plan to > port all effect areas of the mainline that are going to be replaced by work > in the NextGen MapReduce branch ( > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/mapreduce/branches/MR-279/). > > We've been working on the NextGen MapReduce branch (MAPREDUCE-279) within > Apache for a while now and are excited about it's progress. We think that > this branch will be a huge improvement in scalability, performance and > functionality. We are now confident that we can get it ready for release in > in the next few months. We believe that the next major release of Apache > Hadoop we will test at Yahoo will include the work in this branch and we are > committed to merging the NextGen branch into the mainline after the PMC > approves the merge. > > Meanwhile, we have continued to find and fix bugs on branch-0.20-security > and have been working to port that work into the Hadoop mainline. Most of > this work is done and we've also brought all the patches in from our github > branch into apache subversion, so that it is easy for everyone to see the > work remaining. What we've found is that some of the work in > branch-0.20-security is in code sections that have been completely replaced > / refactored in the NextGen MapReduce branch. Since we are committed to the > NextGen branch, we don't think there is any upside in porting this code into > portions of mainline we expect to discard. All of these JIRAs will be fixed > in the NextGen MapReduce branch and through there ultimately in trunk > (assuming the PMC approves the merge). > > So at this point it is our intent to not port the JIRAs listed above to > trunk, but to wait until we merge NextGen into trunk to resolve these issues > there. If you are interested in seeing these issues ported to mainline, let > us know. We are happy to help review your patches and explain context to > anyone who is interested in doing this work. > > Arun and Eric > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e656850e9b84d804a05c64f4-- From general-return-3232-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 14:45:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86402 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 14:45:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 14:45:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 85848 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 14:44:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85782 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 14:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85774 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 14:44:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:44:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of krjeschke@omniti.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:44:52 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so4748586wwi.29 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:44:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.145.134 with SMTP id p6mr1956466wej.112.1302273872250; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.242.141 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:44:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Surge 2011 CFP Deadline Extended From: Katherine Jeschke To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d647f08e486604a0694319 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d647f08e486604a0694319 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OmniTI is pleased to announce that the CFP deadline for Surge 2011, the Scalability and Performance Conference, (Baltimore: Sept 28-30, 2011) has been extended to 23:59:59 EDT, April 17, 2011. The event focuses upon case studies that demonstrate successes (and failures) in Web applications and Internet architectures. New this year: Hack Day and Unconference on September 28th. For information about topics: http://omniti.com/surge/2011. Get inspired by the 2010 sessions, now online at (http://omniti.com/surge/2010). 2010 attendees compared Surge to the early days of Velocity, and our speakers received 3.5-4 out of 4 stars for quality of presentation and quality of content! Nearly 90% of first-year attendees are planning to come again in 2011. For more information about the CFP or sponsorship of the event, please contact us: surge (AT) omniti (DOT) com. -- Katherine Jeschke Marketing Director OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. 7070 Samuel Morse Drive, Ste.150 Columbia, MD 21046 O: 410/872-4910, 222 C: 443/643-6140 omniti.com circonus.com --0016e6d647f08e486604a0694319-- From general-return-3233-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 17:35:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76901 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 17:35:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 17:35:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 69161 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 17:35:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69096 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 17:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69088 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 17:35:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:35:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:35:13 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p38HYKPJ029943 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:34:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302284060; bh=SXmjn18mHO2/NY5iDO3SZiGCgdNdWsMMqaQUykRrJC0=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=Pz22z4OvPFgBW5nYRI8UbfLlTSWlzIPDZxma31cEC3jMPTIuwu0qTPXO0L0mSPov7 RO7hTMbvsybUKalrl51b+u+iPvEQ9KT1WaGrwV5f4zOLQdK6/Btenlg8Wzxq/QJDnx dTYtI+nfa7monGqT47NQyWDtGcF1Z97LVhdpCPYE= Message-Id: <7CCF44E2-EE8D-4A5E-BE5B-5163B37D2342@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:34:22 -0700 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Todd, On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Is there a list available of which patches you've made this decision > about? I'm curious, for example, about MAPREDUCE-2178 -- as of > today, the MR security in trunk has a serious vulnerability. Do we > plan on fixing it, or will the answer be that, if anyone needs > security, they must update to "MR Next Gen"? Apologies if my original message was abstruse - I want to ensure that there is no confusion between 'forward-port' and 'merge from yahoo- merge branch'. Let me try to explain again: there are several forward ports from the hadoop-0.20-2xx (branch-0.20-security) which are complete, including MAPREDUCE-2178. They are currently part of the 'yahoo-merge' branch in MapReduce. These are awaiting a merge into trunk. Trunk (with a few merges from yahoo-merge) will have a complete security implementation. My message was intended to highlight some small number of features/ bugs which are/will-be in hadoop-0.20.2xx. Here is a nearly complete list of such jiras: MAPREDUCE-517, MAPREDUCE-1872, MAPREDUCE-291, MAPREDUCE-2418, MAPREDUCE-2409, MAPREDUCE-2411. I'll check to ensure there aren't others. Hope that makes sense. Again, apologies for any confusion I've caused. thanks, Arun From general-return-3234-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 17:40:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83938 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 17:40:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 17:40:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 76004 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 17:40:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75867 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 17:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75850 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 17:40:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:40:04 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4136995fxm.35 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=j+RmhaJHdjjNqxQIfv1qkIAsEkhYaiUl1ForBbA//qM=; b=h0WXcDDQ0J6OJwmRY6C7ZFWqrINvbwZI/7azUIVQZEMrXj3p89DwTCdDbSCjfY/bFG psy6rsk3cJLZqyi0AwLHDlLkLxbc240YlrSDa77H9bve2LStgMc8rev6wKS7XgkTXtL0 +sezgRNxUMhI5JmWrBXvA3Nv10XZM+s+jmP5c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=IXEdAc0EMihyYMqn2RT1aHDw1BYQjhb3d7ScbfjdSfUTd/V27REUDJKjMz2Cozhhzi CKJZUuvDD8HGhIN90MxHGRas/R9eazEhSMQe88X3LyzW9OXs1cSaQJkkJTRVQ8BH2ntc Q4py0g2PyR5aSNFjFmLBDXL7Z/8u5EgDgMS58= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.25.197 with SMTP id a5mr2604004fac.29.1302284382757; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.96.135 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:39:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yobYcmI-1EYGL1tEjvPawRQnJVI Message-ID: Subject: ANN: HBase 0.90.2 is available for download From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Hbase-User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Apache HBase team is happy to announce the general availability of HBase 0.90.2, available from your Apache mirror of choice: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ HBase 0.90.2 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs since version 0.90.1, while retaining API and data compatibility. The release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: http://su.pr/1F6omq Users upgrading from HBase 0.90.0 or 0.90.1 may upgrade clients and servers separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompanying that release: http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! -The HBase Team From general-return-3235-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 18:09:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87790 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 18:09:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 18:09:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 19561 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 18:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19515 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 18:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19506 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 18:09:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:09:18 +0000 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1557375eya.35 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.32.13 with SMTP id n13mr1164601eea.21.1302286137188; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:08:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.119.199 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:08:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7CCF44E2-EE8D-4A5E-BE5B-5163B37D2342@yahoo-inc.com> References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> <7CCF44E2-EE8D-4A5E-BE5B-5163B37D2342@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:08:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Arun C Murthy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235445b9509a603b04a06c1e1b --00235445b9509a603b04a06c1e1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Is there a list available of which patches you've made this decision >> about? I'm curious, for example, about MAPREDUCE-2178 -- as of today, the MR >> security in trunk has a serious vulnerability. Do we plan on fixing it, or >> will the answer be that, if anyone needs security, they must update to "MR >> Next Gen"? >> > > Apologies if my original message was abstruse - I want to ensure that there > is no confusion between 'forward-port' and 'merge from yahoo-merge branch'. > > Let me try to explain again: there are several forward ports from the > hadoop-0.20-2xx (branch-0.20-security) which are complete, including > MAPREDUCE-2178. They are currently part of the 'yahoo-merge' branch in > MapReduce. These are awaiting a merge into trunk. Trunk (with a few merges > from yahoo-merge) will have a complete security implementation. > Ah, OK, I see. That makes sense. > > My message was intended to highlight some small number of features/bugs > which are/will-be in hadoop-0.20.2xx. Here is a nearly complete list of such > jiras: MAPREDUCE-517, MAPREDUCE-1872, MAPREDUCE-291, MAPREDUCE-2418, > MAPREDUCE-2409, MAPREDUCE-2411. I'll check to ensure there aren't others. > > > Looking briefly at those, it seems that the ones that are clear bugs (with small fixes) should be put in the current MR implementation: MAPREDUCE-2411 MAPREDUCE-2409 MAPREDUCE-2418 (maybe) These all have patches that are pretty small, and I'd imagine would apply pretty easily to trunk. Let me know if you'd like any help forward-porting. The other ones, as new features/improvements, I'd agree it makes sense not to waste effort re-implementing them for trunk MR, but rather to make sure they're incorporated in next-gen. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00235445b9509a603b04a06c1e1b-- From general-return-3236-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 21:21:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5194 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 21:21:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 21:21:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 21491 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 21:21:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21418 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 21:21:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21410 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 21:21:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:21:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:21:09 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p38LKPbI002073 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:20:25 -0700 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:20:15 -0700 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Thread-Index: Acv2MsYpxOy5hhjfRnav21625sQrFQ== Message-ID: <64807CFA-0C26-4B8E-A81F-5922DF6D6E39@yahoo-inc.com> References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> <7CCF44E2-EE8D-4A5E-BE5B-5163B37D2342@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Todd, your help with the jiras you IDed would be welcome! --- E14 - typing on glass On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:09 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>=20 >> Is there a list available of which patches you've made this decision >>> about? I'm curious, for example, about MAPREDUCE-2178 -- as of today, t= he MR >>> security in trunk has a serious vulnerability. Do we plan on fixing it,= or >>> will the answer be that, if anyone needs security, they must update to = "MR >>> Next Gen"? >>>=20 >>=20 >> Apologies if my original message was abstruse - I want to ensure that th= ere >> is no confusion between 'forward-port' and 'merge from yahoo-merge branc= h'. >>=20 >> Let me try to explain again: there are several forward ports from the >> hadoop-0.20-2xx (branch-0.20-security) which are complete, including >> MAPREDUCE-2178. They are currently part of the 'yahoo-merge' branch in >> MapReduce. These are awaiting a merge into trunk. Trunk (with a few merg= es >> from yahoo-merge) will have a complete security implementation. >>=20 >=20 > Ah, OK, I see. That makes sense. >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> My message was intended to highlight some small number of features/bugs >> which are/will-be in hadoop-0.20.2xx. Here is a nearly complete list of = such >> jiras: MAPREDUCE-517, MAPREDUCE-1872, MAPREDUCE-291, MAPREDUCE-2418, >> MAPREDUCE-2409, MAPREDUCE-2411. I'll check to ensure there aren't others= . >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 > Looking briefly at those, it seems that the ones that are clear bugs (wit= h > small fixes) should be put in the current MR implementation: > MAPREDUCE-2411 > MAPREDUCE-2409 > MAPREDUCE-2418 (maybe) >=20 > These all have patches that are pretty small, and I'd imagine would apply > pretty easily to trunk. Let me know if you'd like any help forward-portin= g. >=20 > The other ones, as new features/improvements, I'd agree it makes sense no= t > to waste effort re-implementing them for trunk MR, but rather to make sur= e > they're incorporated in next-gen. >=20 > -Todd > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3237-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 08 21:41:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82571 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 21:41:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 21:41:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 57005 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 21:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56947 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 21:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56939 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 21:41:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:41:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:40:56 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p38LeJpJ084563 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302298819; bh=gMauk1+TuP8VJ/T8JWQ3lFGEXBDK+vlitGND0dx5WW8=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=ogXX03WAflAL0jVP+Y/Wlt7fZyOEPBcGUN0kl91DmF37IIZNm7lXJiNx8QoaOXE// eaLc/m2iXOGjkKcAZXcqK53PLgepCelsIJDnv9t+rARl3Ql26jGmAR+wwOI6sOxB/I 1X2om24BIFYNA8sM3syqPh6pm8StU0Aoh4cqfFgA= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:40:19 -0700 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> <41978952-FE14-4CD9-8C39-BB3B0E458D55@yahoo-inc.com> <7CCF44E2-EE8D-4A5E-BE5B-5163B37D2342@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > These all have patches that are pretty small, and I'd imagine would > apply pretty easily to trunk. Let me know if you'd like any help > forward-porting. > Thanks Todd, I'm happy to help review etc. > The other ones, as new features/improvements, I'd agree it makes > sense not to waste effort re-implementing them for trunk MR, but > rather to make sure they're incorporated in next-gen. Yep, exactly. Glad to know it makes sense. thanks, Arun From general-return-3238-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 04:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73191 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 04:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 04:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9070 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 04:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8344 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 04:53:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8336 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 04:53:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:53:24 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_jHg2v1w4fa7q8uNB1GNaEw)" Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJF001WC6WEKR20@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:53:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-10_02:2011-04-09,2011-04-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090149 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:53:02 -0700 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Boundary_(ID_jHg2v1w4fa7q8uNB1GNaEw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I'm fine w/ abandoning but that needs to be clearly communicated with changes to the website. This is complicated by the fact that it looks like 0.21 docs are the only ones on the website for hdfs and mapreduce (which seems like a bug): http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/ http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/ Common has a bunch of back revs: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/ Nige On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Tom White wrote: > I'm not currently planning on doing a 0.21.1 release. I agree with > Todd that it would be better to spend time getting 0.22 ready for a > release. > > Cheers, > Tom > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Some recent discussion on HDFS-1786 has raised an interesting question: does >> anyone plan on maintaining the 0.21 branch and eventually releasing an >> 0.21.1? Should we bother to commit bug fixes to this branch? >> >> It seems to me that our time would be better spent getting 0.22 and trunk >> back to a green state so we can talk about releasing them, rather than >> applying patches to a branch with no releases planned. >> >> Of course a decision now doesn't preclude anyone from stepping up later, >> backporting patches to 0.21, and releasing an 0.21.1. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> --Boundary_(ID_jHg2v1w4fa7q8uNB1GNaEw)-- From general-return-3239-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 05:01:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86280 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 05:01:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 05:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14535 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14318 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:01:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14308 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 05:01:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:01:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:01:34 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJF00AMY79ZLU10@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:01:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-10_02:2011-04-09,2011-04-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090150 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:01:11 -0700 Message-id: <31722744-6C23-4AB0-BB5C-86CE3D2A3522@mac.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org AFAICT, Owen was the one to -1 removal of HDFS Proxy. Owen, are you guys maintaining this? Cheers, Nige On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Could those of you who -1ed the removal of HDFS Proxy please look into the > test that has been failing our Hudson build for the last several months: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1666 > > It is one thing to say that > we "should" maintain a piece of code, but it's another to actually maintain > it. In my mind, part of maintaining a project involves addressing consistent > test failures as high priority items. > > -Todd > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> For closure, this vote fails due to a couple binding -1 votes. >> >> Nige >> >> On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> >>> Hi Bernd, >>> >>> Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but >> Hadoop is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and >> cluster sizes. >>> >>> There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People >> select Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / problem >> grows, Hadoop can grow with it. >>> >>> --- >>> E14 - via iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" < >> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>> Hi Bernd. >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>>>>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>>>>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >>>>>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>>>> >>>>> This has been the situation in the past, >>>>> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>>>> >>>>> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main >> code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 >> branch, >>>>> and their recent commits to trunk. >>>>> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and >> sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your >> concerns. >>>>> >>>>> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see >> the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in >> MAPREDUCE-279. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand >> there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >>>> >>>> I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. >>>> Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think >>>> that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into >>>> the right direction. >>>> >>>>>> This is open source development upside down. >>>>>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >>>>>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >>>>>> line of code changed. >>>>>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP >> clearance process. >>>>>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >>>>>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >>>>>> >>>>>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >>>>>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained >> here. >>>>>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >>>>>> Release branches stagnate. >>>>> >>>>> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being >> extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. >>>>> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least >> 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for >> someone to verify. >>>> >>>> It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get >>>> there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this >>>> size. >>>> >>>>>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >>>>>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >>>>>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate >> doors. >>>>>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( >>>>>> >> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ >>>>>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >>>>>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >>>>>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is >>>>>> an improvement. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >>>>>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >>>>>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >>>>>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, >>>>>> well, so be it. >>>>> >>>>>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >>>>>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >>>>>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized >>>>>> cluster instead. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there >> who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to >> see hadoop become something that only runs well on >>>>> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. >>>> >>>> But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. >>>> >>>> Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase >>>> into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized >>>> clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month >>>> time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open >>>> source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without >>>> becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on >>>> the low-end and medium sized users. >>>> >>>> I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end >>>> users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* >>>> obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and >>>> developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't >>>> need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, >>>> they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. >>>> All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't >>>> have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. >>>> >>>> Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to >>>> the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big >>>> companies either. >>>> Focus on all the users. >>>> >>>> Bernd >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3240-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 05:14:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28530 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 05:14:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 05:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 23227 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:14:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23182 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23174 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 05:14:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:14:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:14:28 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJF004027UQL570@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:13:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-10_02:2011-04-09,2011-04-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090152 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <7F080B69-E0AE-4A38-9928-048377E73E72@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:13:38 -0700 Message-id: References: <5E398D0F-ABCC-497B-939A-9213A5B3C7C4@mac.com> <7F080B69-E0AE-4A38-9928-048377E73E72@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 5, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > I liked your previous plan. Could you summarize your current plan? I basically gave up. Most everyone I talked to at various meetups was enthusiastically supportive of removing contrib components. When put to a vote on list, however, most were vetoed by 1 or 2 people. > Are we now planning to leave inactive projects in place? I guess so. HDFS Proxy seems like an example of this. > Ship them as source? I would support that as a fallback. > Seems like this still sends a confusing message. I'm all for removing them from trunk in SVN, leaving a wiki link to their most recent state and letting their contributors make a case to revive them in whatever place they choose. > > Keeping projects with small constituencies in our tree seems counter productive. Agreed, but we couldn't reach consensus. Cheers, Nige > On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> +1. And only include them as source in releases. >> >> Nige >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Tom White wrote: >> >>> For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we >>> remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib >>> component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what >>> ZooKeeper does, for example. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann >>> wrote: >>>> -1. >>>> >>>> Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better >>>> (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within >>>> the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop >>>> community, which would be good. >>>> If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, >>>> it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. >>>> >>>> AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the >>>> related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own >>>> premises. >>>> >>>> Bernd >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. >>>>> >>>>> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >>>>> >>>>> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). >>>>> >>>>> Common Contrib: >>>>> failmon >>>>> hod >>>>> test >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MapReduce Contrib: >>>>> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >>>>> data_join >>>>> dynamic-scheduler >>>>> eclipse-plugin >>>>> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >>>>> gridmix >>>>> index >>>>> mrunit >>>>> mumak >>>>> raid >>>>> sqoop >>>>> streaming -- move to MR core? >>>>> vaidya >>>>> vertica >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> HDFS Contrib: >>>>> fuse-dfs >>>>> hdfsproxy >>>>> thriftfs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>>>> >>>> >> > From general-return-3241-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 05:52:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79875 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 05:52:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 05:52:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 34055 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:52:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33464 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 05:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33453 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 05:52:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:52:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:52:00 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_83DnkAv8KvVdNItvfTDWdQ)" Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJF00FWG9KLF270@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:50:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-10_02:2011-04-09,2011-04-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090157 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:50:45 -0700 In-reply-to: <33A12FDB-820A-4CCC-9AB7-0521B41952B1@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> <33A12FDB-820A-4CCC-9AB7-0521B41952B1@mac.com> Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_83DnkAv8KvVdNItvfTDWdQ) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT mrunit has been moved to the incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/ I'll file an issue to remove the code from Hadoop SVN. Nige On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > This is great! So we'll leave mrunit in contrib until it can be moved to incubator. > > Nige > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> Just to add to the option of going to incubator, I'm fine with that as well. >> Github was an easy thing to get started and I was under the impression we >> needed some greater degree of committer diversity and, frankly, a bigger >> project. If mrunit is a candidate, keeping this under the ASF umbrella is >> more than fine with me. >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: >> >>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I >>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in the >>> best interest of its users. >>> >>> MRUnit is valuable to users of several different versions of Hadoop. But >>> MRUnit has only ever been committed to version 0.21 and above -- even >>> though >>> in practice, the majority (dare I say--all) of its users are running on >>> 0.20. The only place today to get a version of MRUnit compatible with 0.20 >>> has been through a Cloudera release, which backported the entire MRUnit >>> patchset. >>> >>> My thoughts on MRUnit in 0.20.100 resonate with Eric's. There will be >>> further fixes to MRUnit and its lightweight codebase can be released far >>> more rapidly than whenever the next 0.20.1xx release of Hadoop would occur. >>> Given that MRUnit has already been in the repository since April 2009 (see >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5518) and has yet to see an >>> Apache 0.20-based release, I do not think it is in the best interest of the >>> library's userbase to couple MRUnit's release cycle to that of Hadoop >>> itself. >>> >>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not >>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client library >>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >>> >>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can >>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this >>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I >>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and >>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >>> >>> Regards, >>> - Aaron >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < >>> chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >>> >>>> Awesome Patrick, we'd probably need one more active mentor. Any takers? >>>> >>>> After we get that, then we cook up a proposal on the Incubator wiki here >>>> [1], and follow the process here [2] to get started... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal >>>> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html >>>> >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for >>>> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >>>>> >>>>> I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >>>>> also be happy to be a mentor. >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the >>>> most >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> important. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion >>> in >>>> the >>>>>>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). >>>> Independent of >>>>>>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to >>>> facilitate >>>>>>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public >>>> facing >>>>>>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this >>>> with the >>>>>>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or >>>> touch >>>>>>> non-public APIs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave >>>> this >>>>>>>>> within the ASF. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting >>> system >>>> for >>>>>>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >>>>>>> suggested it to me initially. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>>>>>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support >>>> read-write >>>>>>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier >>>> at >>>>>>>> Apache than at github. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Owen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Eric Sammer >>>>>>> twitter: esammer >>>>>>> data: www.cloudera.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>>>> Senior Computer Scientist >>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>> Senior Computer Scientist >>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > --Boundary_(ID_83DnkAv8KvVdNItvfTDWdQ)-- From general-return-3242-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 06:10:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34192 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 06:10:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 06:10:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 44241 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 06:10:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43734 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 06:10:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43565 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 06:09:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:09:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:09:49 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_kQNMshv4ySB0L5RxZHdg5w)" Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJF003OEAFRQB20@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:09:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-10_02:2011-04-09,2011-04-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090160 From: Nigel Daley Subject: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:09:27 -0700 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: Message-id: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_kQNMshv4ySB0L5RxZHdg5w) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing the re-organization of our svn layout: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday April 21 at 11am PDT. - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. - I will run the script to make the changes. - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users are taken care of at the same time? (what are these) More info on this change is at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_kQNMshv4ySB0L5RxZHdg5w)-- From general-return-3243-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 10:13:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90494 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 10:13:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 10:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 89198 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 10:06:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88843 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 10:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54586 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 06:57:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 09:57:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.2 is available for download From: Lior Schachter To: Stack , general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f32e04db1e204a08af8ed --20cf307f32e04db1e204a08af8ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Stack, We already have version 0.90.1 installed on our production cluster and we want to upgrade to 0.90.2. Obviously we should upgrade the hbase-0.90.1.jar with the new jar. Should we upgrade other libraries/configuration files ? Is there a maven repository with the new version ? Thanks, Lior On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Stack wrote: > The Apache HBase team is happy to announce the general availability of > HBase > 0.90.2, available from your Apache mirror of choice: > > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ > > HBase 0.90.2 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs > since version 0.90.1, while retaining API and data compatibility. The > release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: > > http://su.pr/1F6omq > > Users upgrading from HBase 0.90.0 or 0.90.1 may upgrade clients and servers > separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading > from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompanying > that release: > > http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html > > As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! > > -The HBase Team > --20cf307f32e04db1e204a08af8ed-- From general-return-3244-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 12:37:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57305 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 12:37:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 12:37:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59504 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 12:37:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59427 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 12:37:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59418 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 12:37:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:37:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:36:58 +0000 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so2470962yia.35 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6qPZqQtzRh/5+SiFNJR8YOvj4avSEbGClQgmWP5WVhc=; b=XBiMqsG1lRknFd7NiLdIeZlcYd/eUe7YCcML0AL7dYRwZfXOD0yqpUMMG9sT63vp9X TkVAbwpAEEkEzlC7E8I5j3J6fr5eg4zixyF6IJyjxO/ckQOMUl0kkcTCYhu5RoC03Fwo 3bLKMuidyFKRV0in1IBWr+GdtjWFfRhW1cHTk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OYv+ARCV4hkRK4q9Ofa4dfuEmtwTsslu+MI8z+59vUnK1K8uU6wMKCxioc+dyM4ZF/ dyB/nOIKi1DrxsZWI3LO8ZPsQg0udOtso0/cSK3Xy3iPXujxJSSSQYvzYnZU7Co2nSEr 52tqstxujr93a45aR7EbvKBXnZxKVTMGBmBik= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.161.163 with SMTP id w23mr5451323yhk.245.1302438997181; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.111.34 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:36:37 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: hbase From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just curious, does hbase require mapreduce? Basically, I have several terabytes of data and I would like to query it similar to sql fashion. Was wondering if mapreduce was required. From general-return-3245-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 13:57:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1668 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 13:57:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 13:57:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 81781 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 13:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81712 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 13:57:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81704 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 13:57:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:57:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.178] (HELO mail-px0-f178.google.com) (209.85.212.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:56:55 +0000 Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so3193055pxi.37 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Bitt5HtiUa7Ms3ccW7/1K+zyN99Ko7Sv/WIeVOCTIug=; b=NsB2NO80InIlmpj1cAdCBMSdEcpq2hkYsaTLUTtwD8g4AHPJqVpLTIVBtEMAaY/iZP DhwK5N0sYa8dS1UiOZWWgkT9qHe8iuS7MbJm00JvfHDCh0jIUsGojR/2qemEMhSreVyn X53BYbw1KmiomuDccWj6eJKjZxTxJpePjhFM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ssEPG7y1hOnd+B81QllRIcSW8p9krRpXk9dwlSg2MdPUUiP9VREL23PB4oz9lR6xQC clPHtIoEoP0p+TqSV0eeopwEk8g2UWm5aXZs3ZFR+E1BkiR/RgdeLlo1+LEkFCYOM53/ DX4qulfmYSQUkL476oaj0eIgYMd8R05r3Xlgs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.47.6 with SMTP id z6mr4042494wfj.227.1302443794033; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.62.166 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:56:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 06:56:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hbase From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd480ecaeee7204a090d3f2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd480ecaeee7204a090d3f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mapreduce isn't required. For your query, Hive would be a better fit. On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Just curious, does hbase require mapreduce? Basically, I have several > terabytes of data and I would like to query it similar to sql fashion. > Was wondering if mapreduce was required. > --000e0cd480ecaeee7204a090d3f2-- From general-return-3246-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 10 15:37:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40155 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 15:37:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 15:37:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 40191 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 15:37:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40121 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 15:37:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40113 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 15:37:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:37:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:37:02 +0000 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so2503159yia.35 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:36:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FPt3cKYqf80RrE2AqsESxb/bMmgHruekmdkjZJG5vz8=; b=NnGihRG11z0NVgQohfDNloS3GHmrQtvnAz+5U40xRzESm3E+UIvpQlGmZyWm+N2cnL ganeydcI3gLCK6JM8WFd3fRxIu4zYqwfeanMsbmK1luj46JYbikMNx8XXEG0cIR5kjIV AgMhLaTMCg90GGWM1En4OT67CkAd1pMhZn22k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eGQ8u4lcDIg4YE0uNmzKEvLayfEmaRtM7ZVAvT9tmwYfcp3i+rjtQqkdc08MoIdwe2 EqMy3dyBH+ewvDl92rgW/s4I1I/G9SO+pCVpNTd1htrGQ3lEy3vyeqaPBQikWeBnb9Cw 4a81Hdu/aqo166gEDv2KMnvIPzFkzfVEJ2sd0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.176.227 with SMTP id b63mr5172422yhm.494.1302449801858; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.111.34 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:36:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:36:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hbase From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Ted Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It seems with HIVE is a large latency. Is there anything else out there which has less latencies? On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Mapreduce isn't required. > For your query, Hive would be a better fit. > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> Just curious, does hbase require mapreduce? Basically, I have several >> terabytes of data and I would like to query it similar to sql fashion. >> Was wondering if mapreduce was required. >> > From general-return-3247-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 12:19:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6659 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 12:19:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 12:19:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 52504 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 12:19:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52136 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 12:19:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52092 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 12:19:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:19:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:19:12 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanaghi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9G4u-0006f9-Ea; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:18:48 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: isabel@apache.org Subject: Berlin Buzzwords - Schedule published/ Call for Hackathons Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:18:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2864944.n8WrOiHzbG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104111418.46016.isabel@apache.org> --nextPart2864944.n8WrOiHzbG Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, as of today the schedule of Berlin Buzzwords is available online at: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/program We are amazed by the amount and quality of the submissions we got. As a res= ult=20 this year we have added one more track to the main conference. If you haven= 't=20 done so already, make sure to book your ticket now - early bird tickets are= =20 already sold out. As we would like to give visitors of our main conference a reason to stay i= n=20 town for the whole week, we have been talking to local co-working spaces an= d=20 companies asking them for free space and WiFi to host Hackathons right afte= r the=20 main conference - that is on June 8th through 10th. If you would like to gather with fellow developers and users of your projec= t,=20 fix bugs together, hack on new features or give users a hands-on introducti= on to=20 your tools, please submit your workshop proposal to our wiki: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/node/428 Please note that slots are assigned on a first come first serve basis. We a= re=20 doing our best to get you connected, however space is limited. The deal is simple: We get you in touch with a conference room provider. Yo= ur=20 event gets promoted in our schedule. Co-Ordination however is completely up= to=20 you: Make sure to provide an interesting abstract, provide a Hackathon=20 registration area - see the Barcamp page for a good example: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/wiki/barcamp Attending Hackathons requires a Berlin Buzzwords ticket and (then free)=20 registration at the Hackathon in question. Looking forward to meeting you in Berlin, The Berlin Buzzwords team. --nextPart2864944.n8WrOiHzbG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk2i8aUACgkQPJpCBAwIhbT59ACgkWxk/rb74ijF4tCTPvnpg3YB LckAoKjdSDg++xmEUIvvfTLGESsEM09Y =r5Fb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2864944.n8WrOiHzbG-- From general-return-3248-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 15:25:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25560 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 15:25:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 15:25:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 37554 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 15:25:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37510 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 15:25:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37502 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 15:25:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:25:40 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4483931qwj.35 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:25:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BaGwmCiLaKCNZrv2gqNJq7lJVFh3XSoB714khRACLa0=; b=EkdJcDzW3/DEQ8FtXiyMhAXZwU0G7/lQIHfvOsaKg3e/jwGIyE34YzOCY1kLpSEFyY Eyv08RPQB2u89lPK8E+71vfD5OMqkJfMzN6/X/4O8yjuNRVtoe/if25qKCtxuK20DQw4 yoauGHaxvwI9yFwxOZnDwMQoSqIR9W/rOp1UM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mkSWGUh+Rok0ncibp8SOZJCths3QoVXsq9XNsaPsALFPfQ20WlDuThfQ4FAj5DhdSw W3K6deorPADq3Gh/6zaLKh81K2zUE0LF0FJqcE5jpL8knwD61t+5u7l0c+ywrsU2ej4U +Q9Gntgjw5+utE+5cf6OECOZpG3JGSe5DW0fw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.186.166 with SMTP id fl6mr3676736vdc.179.1302535519398; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.166.198 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:25:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:25:19 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7gSNQXoukW1a-guEZr4YMJrf7N4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.2 is available for download From: Stack To: Lior Schachter Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Lior and Joe: Sorry for the mvn lag. The mvn deploy system is smarter than me. The deploy requires four full builds of HBase running all tests. I inevitably get distracted and forget the process or else I am demented and answer one of the questions just off and then I have to start over. I'm not sure how it all works either and should take the time to figure it (but again, distraction, dementia take over...). It should be up soon. I'm on it. St.Ack On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Lior Schachter wrote= : > Hi Stack, > > We already have version 0.90.1 installed on our production cluster and we > want to upgrade to 0.90.2. > Obviously we should upgrade the hbase-0.90.1.jar with the new jar. > Should we upgrade other libraries/configuration files ? > Is there a maven repository with the new version ? > > Thanks, > Lior > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Stack wrote: >> >> The Apache HBase team is happy to announce the general availability of >> HBase >> 0.90.2, available from your Apache mirror of choice: >> >> =A0http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ >> >> HBase 0.90.2 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs >> since version 0.90.1, while retaining API and data compatibility. The >> release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: >> >> =A0http://su.pr/1F6omq >> >> Users upgrading from HBase 0.90.0 or 0.90.1 may upgrade clients and >> servers >> separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading >> from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes >> accompanying >> that release: >> >> =A0http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html >> >> As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! >> >> -The HBase Team > > From general-return-3249-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 15:54:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33601 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 15:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 15:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 82675 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 15:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 15:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82604 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 15:54:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:54:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 21442 invoked by uid 507); 11 Apr 2011 15:53:37 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.022846 secs); 11 Apr 2011 15:53:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 15:53:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DC61324682 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:53:37 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LGudfuTEVDmj; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:53:37 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.29] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.29]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F5613246B6 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:53:36 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DA32452.90804@uci.cu> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:54:58 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Where I can find all info about the next ApacheCon References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regards to all the Apache colleagues. I had the completed information about the next ApacheCon on a message, but I lost it. Where I can find it? If the completed information is on one email, please send to me. Thanks a lot for your time -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 From general-return-3250-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 16:00:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37568 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 16:00:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 16:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 91838 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 16:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91790 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 16:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91782 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 16:00:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:00:22 +0000 Received: by pwi14 with SMTP id 14so3073508pwi.35 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=19a5BMLSvVZq9fp5gEcm2Ad+TddEgUvYoA9rCmXJbUw=; b=kOT9LydxgN4Wx2/ZX84DdeuWXcQLxrsarW7A0I0hDvbBtHsyuGAxvk6fPySzTRIHfi VgHG2xg4iUDJI85hyvIyRrKCiRJjQRA6zKRKXPlKhtv/CW0DwPSklEMOZzWrVe84SBcW cx/RS1twq8ZlTabxaSYcrs1GQl48tIEWk/HSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eUd0q0RqhjRpONy0t11G6Hdfa7QFjgVvzzV8vRDWYsep+5+UMxyy9WCN7wUb2m3Mqr NCbDgiYNrFmCv7zmi1TT0dGyPNN3MPvQEuiAe6z4ZusOHDpqbDB7ytET0bY0emb0K5Xr 9ZcOUkWE4JSXelP2kcY97V2J8gq86jjc0bDmA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.67.30 with SMTP id p30mr5490645wfa.112.1302537601188; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.48.168 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DA32452.90804@uci.cu> References: <4DA32452.90804@uci.cu> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:00:01 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GOsSmsWx4mhfGQFBsr0T4OfaTMo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Where I can find all info about the next ApacheCon From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org http://www.apachecon.com You're welcome. J-D On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > > Regards to all the Apache colleagues. > I had the completed information about the next ApacheCon on a message, bu= t I > lost it. > Where I can find it? > If the completed information is on one email, please send to me. > > Thanks a =A0lot for your time > > -- > Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > =A0Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) > =A0University of Information Sciences, > =A0La Habana, Cuba > =A0Linux User # 418229 > > > From general-return-3251-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 16:12:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90321 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 16:12:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 16:12:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 9230 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9178 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9170 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:12:50 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so3053992pzk.35 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+mbfjcTWnVOlCPk5hJhyDybBemRwKCje/a3NjBo6tt4=; b=Bc9tykpq7zNVxov1Kt3kpBh2AUxDpQJMPQ7XJmdbxvlS/2K2jC+SxFeRQ2BmztWeY/ oGMi7ENuAvFclGGSMeA5sqp8fm+4ivhofUPk2YfecIbVE7W6RjEhSrjktrCtA3t20YZr YzGVnn1ZAYyM+Xh4zJAMhjXdCi5l7owju0Hsw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ctu9sB1b/7NOYkspYrl5DwSWMhtZx20tSG7yGjMhY4ppWGelq9wPqqq9bh0YYoCPL3 950xeeNarOVZe5Z336jrvpyzgTsECaJoN3n+Rd23/UqwI6Q3pawrb6DKhHRKUoccR6ia HvZajwxrqMMdo7J5ZgV9lJaLtnSNhZ3Tu18f4= Received: by 10.142.144.20 with SMTP id r20mr786833wfd.76.1302538350052; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.56.233 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:12:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maintenance of Hadoop 0.21 branch? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Nigel Daley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm fine w/ abandoning but that needs to be clearly communicated with cha= nges to the website. =A0This is complicated by the fact that it looks like = 0.21 docs are the only ones on the website for hdfs and mapreduce (which se= ems like a bug): > http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/ > http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/ > Common has a bunch of back revs: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/ This is an artifact of the project split, since there were no separate HDFS and MapReduce projects before release 0.21.0. The documentation for HDFS and MapReduce was all in Common/Core for 0.20.2 and lower. The websites (http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/, http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/) link to previous versions, but do we need to add links under http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs and http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/ too? Tom > > Nige > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Tom White wrote: > >> I'm not currently planning on doing a 0.21.1 release. I agree with >> Todd that it would be better to spend time getting 0.22 ready for a >> release. >> >> Cheers, >> Tom >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Some recent discussion on HDFS-1786 has raised an interesting question:= does >>> anyone plan on maintaining the 0.21 branch and eventually releasing an >>> 0.21.1? Should we bother to commit bug fixes to this branch? >>> >>> It seems to me that our time would be better spent getting 0.22 and tru= nk >>> back to a green state so we can talk about releasing them, rather than >>> applying patches to a branch with no releases planned. >>> >>> Of course a decision now doesn't preclude anyone from stepping up later= , >>> backporting patches to 0.21, and releasing an 0.21.1. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> > > From general-return-3252-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 11 19:28:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44340 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 19:28:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 19:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 27364 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 19:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27299 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 19:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27291 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 19:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 11864 invoked by uid 507); 11 Apr 2011 19:27:39 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.024092 secs); 11 Apr 2011 19:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 19:27:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DC313246F7 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:27:38 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55kKK3ZTumo7; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:27:35 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.36.18.29] (skynet2010.uci.cu [10.36.18.29]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3B1324687 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:27:34 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DA3567A.8080608@uci.cu> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:28:58 -0400 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Mailing list of the Apache Mahout Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Regards to all I´m trying to subscribe to the mailing list of the Apache Mahout project but it fails. Which is the right list? I tried with with mahout-user-subscribe@mahout.apache.org and it failed. Thanks a lot -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 From general-return-3253-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 12 17:49:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66061 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2011 17:49:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2011 17:49:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 79023 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 17:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78872 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 17:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78753 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2011 17:49:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:49:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:49:16 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so8182378vws.35 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ZcFcDbwZbWMX+6++q16Pvqa+trHvLMScIb8iktvVU0=; b=B0brrWsqmf/PEozUXBd1dJnK+fAFshZHSD56Ch8p9RPAQUXtjmso2+/mMeCdH6motD T/noAou1ozQojOfsf2VAwURfrTlUB2Hh3/3GLJvirkZpWxXoTBlMCE9Gzr7G7sBDKpsx ayQfQ40v7WIXmJqCGJJyKOltsbJ4ctJVEVFVw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=p76/FNXzXe8gkXcty1AxyuHcIwuyuJyy1ZzAI0k/Tw1tHI9eG+i/2obVEcFx/lCJlO 0xZgEYoWbeRIxeTsCG6pgy70sy9b1Qwe200Czb8XEX6GS8fPFqbaFFaj3fdcFpW6Gfyd H39zwW7s5iepPMzGg9Lie7z6ESzxlzcZwN7Gk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.82 with SMTP id bm18mr4351185vdb.99.1302630535306; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.166.198 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tCedyd0Fo5aPHTOgIUN2EI2Lp6s Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: HBase 0.90.2 is available for download From: Stack To: Lior Schachter Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Its up in the release repository now. Let me know if any issue with it (I'm still not sure how I made it happen -- I need to do this process again soon). Thanks for your patience, St.Ack On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Stack wrote: > Lior and Joe: > > Sorry for the mvn lag. =A0The mvn deploy system is smarter than me. =A0Th= e > deploy requires four full builds of HBase running all tests. =A0I > inevitably get distracted and forget the process or else I am demented > and answer one of the questions just off and then I have to start > over. =A0I'm not sure how it all works either and should take the time > to figure it (but again, distraction, dementia take over...). > > It should be up soon. =A0I'm on it. > > St.Ack > > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Lior Schachter wro= te: >> Hi Stack, >> >> We already have version 0.90.1 installed on our production cluster and w= e >> want to upgrade to 0.90.2. >> Obviously we should upgrade the hbase-0.90.1.jar with the new jar. >> Should we upgrade other libraries/configuration files ? >> Is there a maven repository with the new version ? >> >> Thanks, >> Lior >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Stack wrote: >>> >>> The Apache HBase team is happy to announce the general availability of >>> HBase >>> 0.90.2, available from your Apache mirror of choice: >>> >>> =A0http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ >>> >>> HBase 0.90.2 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs >>> since version 0.90.1, while retaining API and data compatibility. The >>> release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: >>> >>> =A0http://su.pr/1F6omq >>> >>> Users upgrading from HBase 0.90.0 or 0.90.1 may upgrade clients and >>> servers >>> separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgradin= g >>> from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes >>> accompanying >>> that release: >>> >>> =A0http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html >>> >>> As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! >>> >>> -The HBase Team >> >> > From general-return-3254-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 13 23:17:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55145 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 23:17:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 23:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 81926 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:17:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81856 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81848 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 23:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.86.194] (HELO web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.136.86.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:17:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 76800 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Apr 2011 23:16:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1302736619; bh=nZ8onj60b78UBtoksa9KtVF2eRM+Nafsvqd2TQ1n4lQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sIvYDlUEzt9WM7XV8K0JzcGSolYspzLf3kPstV0Sq8hKDF3pvK1vQRNs/Kdoaf4cJO4XntyoRZZoiRmevcx82VBT5nfC17+4ijVXVdwdhygot3WRJzL8BUX0kYV4DloEfYfrsa38od1tUHjM12o99U26PdEyY3hB4OvXRPKEibU= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NNZUSgLY0+BAQ2zlDrU5bHHO9dlbBpvigYP0yWEj/I+DLQK/HiY2HiSS7mH/FzScsFjEhzUWr8DdVLTGDbxsjK3ccUPQaB0fKiVA9dv3FMBlF9ckmVeTDRsuCNk3xG8P4tCHZfrUdSx/6Xuf07nQ0bg65/DDdYUFSwk+2PHBf+k=; Message-ID: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 6xJKUiwVM1mLyvrgdOW08xj59YmxozjaObqBTK2hBpYFauM dxNv04wBKTOzwP9wMWGKJ8CJK7SVrHjAQEeq_oBTEpeDcdxCd6GSsmRJ1TsV RvR1Ngqyf4hS2diFF2rw_MFHrS87Ui4dRj_2K5fnstblY85OeVG0Nh8rPr0f wIfsu67Xb87gNyUxSQpPNewpvuT4iT.YWSqSoNxUVI0oSRtVSV5UcSZ_Fxw6 l45UpUavKsBsZwt2UL_xsS24XbVHSTqzWr6wYYAn8GNSn55TWBqukX30OxzV m3y3cu7PEq37pYso.8ui_Bwy36dfkV_UR_T1sSwGpTbfh0Y.KzzbI__BgTwG z78UB5nUFVJM3BBxaJ4pN36LoCvFXImBjc0riov9WyPBnjSnDW7B_CgskDBS Bf7qRCILfFbG_nyaL8ZSkbsTR6tojk4Ry Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:16:59 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:16:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1884554487-1302736619=:72891" --0-1884554487-1302736619=:72891 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! Thanks. Tsz-Wo (Nicholas) Sze --0-1884554487-1302736619=:72891-- From general-return-3255-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 13 23:38:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39251 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 23:38:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 23:38:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 97839 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:38:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97788 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97780 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 23:38:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:38:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:38:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 36576 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 23:37:38 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO awittena-mn.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:37:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <66E52B80-612A-431B-A556-F78693070040@apache.org> References: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop=20 > Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! Yay! Congrats! Now there are even more people who Nicolas can attack about how = they aren't as awesome as he is. From general-return-3256-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 13 23:52:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85173 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 23:52:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 14451 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14401 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14393 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mlortiz@uci.cu designates 200.55.140.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.55.140.180] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (200.55.140.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:52:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 6740 invoked by uid 507); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:19 -0000 Received: from 10.0.0.185 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from , uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 5.0.2.0. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(10.0.0.185):. Processed in 0.025387 secs); 13 Apr 2011 23:52:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (10.0.0.185) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 23:52:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DF81324957; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:19 -0400 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uci.cu Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmPgYTw57Nk7; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:19 -0400 (CDT) Received: from [10.8.46.154] (unknown [10.8.46.154]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB7D1324954; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:52:19 -0400 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DA63E8F.4030600@uci.cu> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:53:43 -0430 From: Marcos Ortiz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi References: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 04/13/2011 06:46 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi all, > > The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop > Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! > > Thanks. > Tsz-Wo (Nicholas) Sze > Well, congratulations, Koji. That's one of my dreams. Regards -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) University of Information Sciences, La Habana, Cuba Linux User # 418229 From general-return-3257-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 13 23:55:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85818 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 23:55:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 23:55:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16314 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:55:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16258 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 23:55:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16250 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 23:55:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:55:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:55:17 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p3DNscI4043726 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:54:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302738878; bh=3HtETb3z61zrqpnfXMnWvR/EYX1cLhnPwk7dSbkws1k=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=wOSaQjQ+q41al+LN9PqfbgABTi0crme45J/w1mzh3hYuDSo9BpxfUKJYY6s/fWbab XCXpAFA1n4qVYcGwmkOVSNuJp5ULHqi2fgv1UtsTkRcuBWpmcOyLqBPEe5fYEYvQSm uuqhqa4VDtQDSSfXblT2bK8PAm1pylwzk0np/F3w= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:54:37 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:54:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Index: Acv6M93DEZaDcUSeQ8uCB8lmxGfFyAAAkbe8 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <66E52B80-612A-431B-A556-F78693070040@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I am sure Koji is reasonable and has a way about him that will not drive Nicolas to that :-) Welcome Koji!=20 On 4/13/11 4:37 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >=20 > On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >=20 >> Hi all, >>=20 >> The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop >> Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! >=20 >=20 > Yay! Congrats! >=20 > Now there are even more people who Nicolas can attack about how they aren= 't as > awesome as he is. >=20 >=20 From general-return-3258-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 14 02:51:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65107 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 02:51:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 02:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 24728 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 02:51:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24465 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 02:51:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24457 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 02:51:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:51:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.69.25] (HELO web30008.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.69.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:51:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 60681 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Apr 2011 02:50:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1302749452; bh=DZ4Gi3LoESJanXs5Y8kwTQz3QuWLZwJEZYX3/j4aHGc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=u+RmQnqquq+t3lfzZFF0uFV7rAOyZDaWGtA2cCMNPHjc2Cm2FFoUZWQiWiOsGwluJZHiFSGgcHUFepw2JdiBNAH7+R9QBn/FWirHor2AOqVKlzV5VsfXBhzHXX/QdQF/O9jI0v0A1/A2hp7csOVVVJqX3XuI/Ss5/Tsgv9SF/sw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=e3xGAV8rViBoyDK7z1Lh88gqXF8R/JcwIFgPaLhL52BJk3GpM8gDXlkYt1Tr5Cdv1r38VzYVu7bj/r/l9zm0shc6GnbimDW3edO60eVeGc5s2WGxE1HfMayjvZ/ukBKfkN5M85mYy2L6Dt3IRb0O+oSAYvDNHyOjj5SsE/FIwJ4=; Message-ID: <861360.49994.qm@web30008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2DbY.54VM1lU3msrPlte53_tqTKbSXZfz88V9j512p15iWU 42w_7ruPdag4ZOmiweA68CrlD2Kkhs1vHcxfy1Crt4Nnm4AC.FCYRVd93oVU mjLqb6GVjjGNwywuQSn_e2R.nHXh6TrDccenxwzPZB2ZYP.zu_yfoYP153Fq t92jD772YIMJJkLJRS8R_NL.8Mlz4eR5wuth1Tn_A1k45C64F28bmTDVpMzM G5Ob3zRVacVm0xIFpHI2YgqZCgDm6oMZqd5Y2Dzhht7moUo6pRyYrKpgagZX HB.C8ml_.UvBilBV__uzkzZYijZWR8cgC04AaeaPPeT2Sb0NBf_eRgyYLpWw Xh.x7WZ7yRmpyKg5XlPx9F7jrRjZYrmJxGlBf_rS_DZDea3gQpx.ItQXGQ85 MpxsptHQrRV1d Received: from [24.6.189.183] by web30008.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:50:52 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 References: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4DA63E8F.4030600@uci.cu> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:50:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Debabrata Biswas Reply-To: Debabrata Biswas Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4DA63E8F.4030600@uci.cu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations=A0Koji Noguchi. It's a great accolade.=0ABest Regards,=0A-D= eb=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom: Marcos Ortiz =0ATo: general@hadoop.apache.org=0ACc: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" =0ASent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 5:23 PM=0ASubj= ect: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi=0A= =0AOn 04/13/2011 06:46 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:=0A> Hi all,=0A> = =0A> The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop=0A> C= ommon/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted.=A0 Welcome aboard Koji!=0A> =0A> = Thanks.=0A> Tsz-Wo (Nicholas) Sze=0A> =0AWell, congratulations, Koji.=0ATha= t's one of my dreams.=0ARegards=0A=0A-- Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda=0AS= oftware Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems)=0AUniversity of Informa= tion Sciences,=0ALa Habana, Cuba=0ALinux User # 418229 From general-return-3259-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 14 07:04:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85119 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 07:04:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 07:04:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 63925 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 07:04:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63871 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 07:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63848 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 07:04:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:04:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:04:30 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p3E73cqY040842 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:03:37 -0700 From: Koji Noguchi To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:03:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Index: Acv6M93DEZaDcUSeQ8uCB8lmxGfFyAAAkbe8AA77Q0M= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Everyone! =20 Koji On 4/13/11 4:54 PM, "Suresh Srinivas" wrote: > I am sure Koji is reasonable and has a way about him that will not drive > Nicolas to that :-) >=20 > Welcome Koji!=20 >=20 >=20 > On 4/13/11 4:37 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi all, >>>=20 >>> The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop >>> Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! >>=20 >>=20 >> Yay! Congrats! >>=20 >> Now there are even more people who Nicolas can attack about how they are= n't >> as >> awesome as he is. >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3260-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 14 15:04:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71436 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 15:04:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 15:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 23713 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 15:04:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23612 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 15:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23604 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 15:04:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:04:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:04:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c84.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.84]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p3EF3x1W083638 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302793440; bh=IG/tHaxk/nC2eTr3OgQn01Nyf34dgYfhHVFc17dU0Tg=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=fqWwubtsxrBpVdrDAJe7u/n9Ik9+oKb4DaYnxh7uQw+NJrUR5O0x92e0JTfOMIlHi i6vazrCKtfpR9Y29BjopDJqFmUrH3N7KSnayYFYymRL8nSCZmY1f4kTBxRSMgfpL7W ef/Sc+ggz7Gm8VKjKikfaNQGCwwh1AqIO1xwfCA4= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:03:59 -0700 References: <834460.72891.qm@web65903.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi all, > > The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop > Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! > Congratulations Koji! Thanks for all your efforts, we look forward to your continued involvement, especially as the voice of the user. Arun From general-return-3261-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 14 19:54:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62705 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 19:54:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 19:54:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 97659 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 19:54:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97598 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 19:54:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97590 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 19:54:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:54:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:54:19 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=hL2n4UQEOynRaCrNK4op/fICVVSuXTcbcXHn7z6fZ+5QX1FsHyUm8nh2 PnjL9lF4oYufLN26ALeMFCZzMy9j7SY/RCCKqO8ct4fu3UyinOOOciW5g oSDi5VdvsZg+y8x; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1302810859; x=1334346859; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Milind=20Bhandarkar=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[ANNOUNCE]=20Hadoop=20Common/HDFS/MapRe duce=20Committer:=20Koji=20Noguchi|Date:=20Thu,=2014=20Ap r=202011=2019:56:53=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"general@hadoop.apache.or g"=20|CC:=20"Tsz=20Wo=20(Nicho las),=20Sze"=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<78A03EA91EBD444F80574FB11CC3E954 @linkedin.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4DA63E8F.4030600@uci.cu>; bh=j0M42xzT61oqvrNoNHILBYOE0s7A7Yb3i6fr4/ZZMqE=; b=Ez0CK016U0Q84frFCY/7zGxkCC4Hm44HepUqvYM6fDoSe0cMAxTH/Vef DAqBBRjWOAtytjnnajREfA0GcN0vgzJHrgI0Qm9kAWCg/9eF9EpLUIK2m GCjaXRaGguRd/RZ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,213,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22176927" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:56:53 -0700 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Index: AQHL+jFdPG6mfGGvm0iJtKGz5+/GfZRc9WGAgADRm4A= Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:56:53 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4DA63E8F.4030600@uci.cu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <78A03EA91EBD444F80574FB11CC3E954@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations Koji ! - milind --=20 Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 4/13/11 5:23 PM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: >On 04/13/2011 06:46 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop >> Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! >> >> Thanks. >> Tsz-Wo (Nicholas) Sze >> >Well, congratulations, Koji. >That's one of my dreams. >Regards > >--=20 >Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) > University of Information Sciences, > La Habana, Cuba > Linux User # 418229 > From general-return-3262-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 15 04:54:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17312 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2011 04:54:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2011 04:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 90076 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 04:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90029 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 04:54:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90021 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 04:54:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 04:54:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 04:54:28 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p3F4rhGB052711 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:53:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1302843224; bh=vAGOUsNor+ji7Kf6T4cpuD6iqrlO5VhQ0cYpP7WmoxE=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=tsCAxiw+5FpE4HlA4vprx5GC1PUrPZgNdgjVZAcSLKUH/S56djxPtFb1h2LEtIi9t Mxx4Dn+sdL2NhRaXWDviH0krrLzD6x8fe9sa73+RKJfWbmzUJzoXiaZi1h9xCYMaQ3 v54L19bBR/26tQ16lX68n/eV7Tq1iMg3EaUqtVIE= Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:23:42 +0530 From: "Ankur C. Goel" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:23:41 +0530 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Common/HDFS/MapReduce Committer: Koji Noguchi Thread-Index: AQHL+jFdPG6mfGGvm0iJtKGz5+/GfZRc9WGAgADRm4CAAJbPOQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9CDCD2D102ADgankuryahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C9CDCD2D102ADgankuryahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Congratulations Koji ! Regards -@nkur On 4/15/11 1:26 AM, "Milind Bhandarkar" wrote: Congratulations Koji ! - milind -- Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com +1-650-776-3167 On 4/13/11 5:23 PM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: >On 04/13/2011 06:46 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Hadoop PMC has elected Koji Noguchi as a committer of Hadoop >> Common/HDFS/MapReduce and he has accepted. Welcome aboard Koji! >> >> Thanks. >> Tsz-Wo (Nicholas) Sze >> >Well, congratulations, Koji. >That's one of my dreams. >Regards > >-- >Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer (Large-Scaled Distributed Systems) > University of Information Sciences, > La Habana, Cuba > Linux User # 418229 > --_000_C9CDCD2D102ADgankuryahooinccom_-- From general-return-3263-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 15 12:11:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60510 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2011 12:11:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2011 12:11:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 70710 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 12:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70626 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 12:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70617 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 12:11:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:11:30 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2045050qwj.35 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=5j5Hrlko9sCHp8SOlAtgaJGruDl2Ipg/SwRID79LCr0=; b=WOhC7/lwbIXCzP16m689hYDplEIU0LvYLCelh/x+URXFZ5EaSP2dBpouC5xn/oyO5H ChfhriAarNQs8tITSaMLb1JFbBAYX66sW6efj7brpgNlRaKGjKcTt3WNv0NgKwLZK4DE jgSuhXNgW9ttDZ5mdTkv9k3x43qk7oXFwck8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=TpTIMp9iBjJYj0ZMjQbxDNiUh6vZe+vpGhlq0wCulrWDJZIeud8mYgEZyn9lgez6wA gS8HA0jwpHwhZJlLWWGyROPiVTQcFHvNRyQr+nn2kynvpSM9+8JkiwE16jgrXC8a854l QVBWrED/V+8YmMEd7pLargjNMMSzyKNCGGSeo= Received: by 10.229.118.195 with SMTP id w3mr1366562qcq.203.1302869469674; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.180.150.19] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s9sm1901054qco.36.2011.04.15.05.11.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:11:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hadoop 0.20.100 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:11:06 -0400 Message-Id: <13A19700-AAB7-4F87-AA51-FEB5A4E2781E@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hey guys. are we still planning to build a release for this version? or have we = skipped it and moved to 0.20.20x ? TIA Ian= From general-return-3264-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 15 15:54:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98722 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2011 15:54:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2011 15:54:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 67328 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 15:54:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67232 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 15:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67220 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 15:54:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:54:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:54:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 98347 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 15:54:27 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:54:27 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so4915344qyk.14 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:54:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.149 with SMTP id hy21mr1633252qcb.51.1302882866669; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.250.147 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:54:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop security branch releases (was Hadoop 0.20.100) From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630fac373a87c04a0f70ea1 --00163630fac373a87c04a0f70ea1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I've been doing a bit of travelling, but I'm back now. (Just buried in email, even more than normal.) The general strategy is that the branch (branch-0.20-security) has the current work on the branch. The releases off of the security branch are labelled with numbers in the 200 range. We originally planned on using the 100 range, but I'd like to bring it into sync with the Yahoo numbering. (The intent was to reduce confusion. The github push I did last summer, which was the basis for CDH3, was labelled 104. I really don't want inconsistent versions with the same number.) So the megapatch that Arun pushed was 202. I'm in the last stages of fixing the contrib unit tests for 203 and hope to be able to call a vote shortly. I would expect a 204 release next month branching off of branch-0.20-security. -- Owen --00163630fac373a87c04a0f70ea1-- From general-return-3265-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 15 17:19:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73128 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2011 17:19:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2011 17:19:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 98560 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 17:19:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98507 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 17:19:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98499 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 17:19:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:19:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:19:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 71252 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 17:19:19 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.42.176]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:19:19 +0000 Message-ID: <4DA87E14.8000600@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:19:16 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop security branch releases (was Hadoop 0.20.100) References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is the intent for these branches to do anything but mirror Y!'s internal branches? Doug On 04/15/2011 08:54 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Hi all, > I've been doing a bit of travelling, but I'm back now. (Just buried in > email, even more than normal.) The general strategy is that the branch > (branch-0.20-security) has the current work on the branch. The releases off > of the security branch are labelled with numbers in the 200 range. We > originally planned on using the 100 range, but I'd like to bring it into > sync with the Yahoo numbering. (The intent was to reduce confusion. The > github push I did last summer, which was the basis for CDH3, was labelled > 104. I really don't want inconsistent versions with the same number.) So the > megapatch that Arun pushed was 202. I'm in the last stages of fixing the > contrib unit tests for 203 and hope to be able to call a vote shortly. I > would expect a 204 release next month branching off of branch-0.20-security. > > -- Owen > From general-return-3266-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 15 18:19:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70534 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2011 18:19:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2011 18:19:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 35759 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 18:19:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35696 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2011 18:19:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35688 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 18:19:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:19:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:19:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 68769 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2011 18:19:14 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:19:14 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so3667950iwr.35 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:19:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.140.34 with SMTP id g34mr1782914ibu.195.1302891553762; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.166.76 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:19:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DA87E14.8000600@apache.org> References: <4DA87E14.8000600@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:19:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop security branch releases (was Hadoop 0.20.100) From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The branches are Apache branches. They are intended to be developed here, as was discussed on general@. For all effects and purposes, Y! retired its internal branches. If you missed the discussion, it's in the archives. This message is about version numbers, and version numbers only. The branch version numbering follows what Y! has been using internally. It also does not conflict with the version numbers pushed to github and absorbed by other consumers of that branch, e.g. CDH and Facebook. The intent is to reduce confusion among users and release engineers in organizations that were pulling from the retired repositories. The intent is to ease their transition (back) to Apache. -C On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Is the intent for these branches to do anything but mirror Y!'s internal > branches? > > Doug > > On 04/15/2011 08:54 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> Hi all, >> =A0 =A0I've been doing a bit of travelling, but I'm back now. (Just buri= ed in >> email, even more than normal.) The general strategy is that the branch >> (branch-0.20-security) has the current work on the branch. The releases = off >> of the security branch are labelled with numbers in the 200 range. We >> originally planned on using the 100 range, but I'd like to bring it into >> sync with the Yahoo numbering. (The intent was to reduce confusion. The >> github push I did last summer, which was the basis for CDH3, was labelle= d >> 104. I really don't want inconsistent versions with the same number.) So= the >> megapatch that Arun pushed was 202. I'm in the last stages of fixing the >> contrib unit tests for 203 and hope to be able to call a vote shortly. I >> would expect a 204 release next month branching off of branch-0.20-secur= ity. >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-3267-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 19 13:37:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 132901DC6 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92772 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 02:24:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91935 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 02:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91797 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2011 02:24:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:24:31 +0000 Received: by pwi14 with SMTP id 14so3875475pwi.35 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:24:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ca76R1+hGhfP/8q4gClmmuuiILLM8hWuD2Dw9/Lz3As=; b=gGDm310GxSSqHGKkH/0A3bQX+jyp43RddFpul9KveR28IBHgmdI6WGlqrMuREkkz6n 7YaES0PRyKnnmzz16HCAKqCiquDAXPFpQzLPeTSRRSVSRli5uI3EgYSzrMMBbFPyYyPX aoE/klNn5F3gtZJFAaQllmDAvDm9pIVTUSCRo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=JEDdWihgEQSroyGKigwDFR85nTwbIP0xevPtRkedRP5B0vdSDExFZwOW3RA/5G/5hn GMsw3zGZBFPHedJY6QgFtExeUVCOoZedTAdX9cZDo+vVCaR6grVRdE289bDBlU6XsS8b aeJI1bNciqQoe6yWSpqVCvkkLA8weEN3R3K7c= Received: by 10.68.49.103 with SMTP id t7mr7626293pbn.330.1303179851067; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:24:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.62.6 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:23:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:23:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: April SFHUG recap, May SFHUG meetup announcement To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec544eee219efe604a13c3460 --bcaec544eee219efe604a13c3460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Hadoop fans, This last week we had a very successful meetup of the SF Hadoop User Group, hosted by Twitter. Breakout topics included: * Log analysis * Cluster resource management * FlumeBase * Reusable MapReduce scripts * Languages for MapReduce programming * Hadoop Roadmap * Oozie Best Practices * HBase how-to * NameNode SPOF best practices * Dirty Data Notes for some of these breakout sessions are posted on the meetup group's message board at: http://bit.ly/hIpU7G I am also pleased to announce that the May Hadoop meetup will be held on Wednesday, May 11, from 6pm to 8pm. This meetup will be hosted by our friends at Cloudera, in their new SF office. As usual, we will use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All Hadoop-related topics are encouraged, and all members of the Hadoop community are welcome. Event schedule: 6pm - Welcome 6:30pm - Introductions; start creating agenda Breakout sessions begin as soon as we're ready 8pm - Conclusion Food and refreshments will be provided, courtesy of Cloudera. Please RSVP at http://bit.ly/hwMCI2 Looking forward to seeing you there! Regards, - Aaron Kimball --bcaec544eee219efe604a13c3460-- From general-return-3268-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 19 15:28:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAFE61A3E for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8882 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 15:27:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8790 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 15:27:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8780 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2011 15:27:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:27:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.83.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of james@tynt.com) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:27:51 +0000 Received: by pve37 with SMTP id 37so4042766pve.35 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.171.4 with SMTP id t4mr3660487wfe.434.1303226849752; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.15.238] ([68.144.33.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm5824wfa.5.2011.04.19.08.27.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Hadoop in Canada From: James Seigel In-Reply-To: <20110331094236.5335a912@essen.neofonie.priv> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:27:27 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <84410BE7-0385-45C5-A915-8518860C8762@tynt.com> References: <46ED7CAE-5DE6-4453-8E04-802055EBE379@tynt.com> <20110331094236.5335a912@essen.neofonie.priv> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey thanks for the heads up..I am going to try and get there! Are you in Vancouver? J On 2011-03-31, at 1:42 AM, Isabel Drost wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 11 Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: >> I would actually love to see something getting organized and I'd be on >> the first plane to Y** > > Not exactly a meetup but Apache Con () is > to take place in Vancouver, includes a "cloud computing" track focused > on Hadoop and friends, call for participation is open. > > Isabel From general-return-3269-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 19 16:08:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A253184B for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74048 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 16:08:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73989 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2011 16:08:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73981 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2011 16:08:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:08:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.12] (HELO col0-omc1-s2.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:08:17 +0000 Received: from COL117-W28 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s2.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:07:56 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: Would being able to track the time a task was active? Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:07:55 -0500 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Apr 2011 16:07:56.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1E2DAB0:01CBFEAB] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok=2C=20 Maybe I'm missing something=2C but when I look at my jobs running=2C I see = the job start time and then the end time of the specific task running.=20 Wouldn't it make sense to know the time it took for the task to run=2C rath= er than count from the launch of the job? So if I have a task that has to wait for other tasks ahead of it in the que= ue to run=2C I'd like to see if the task took 20 mins to run like the other= s=2C rather than 2 hours and some minutes because the job had so many tasks= and fair scheduler put some tasks on hold? Just a thought. -Mike = From general-return-3270-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 05:03:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D52F280D for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18434 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:03:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18370 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:03:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18362 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 05:03:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:03:16 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_ft1ZFsw2HIiAU3NwCzPjAw)" Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJX00I61Q0TK020@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-20_01:2011-04-20,2011-04-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104190130 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:02:53 -0700 In-reply-to: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Ian Holsman , Todd Lipcon , Owen O'Malley References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> Message-id: <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Boundary_(ID_ft1ZFsw2HIiAU3NwCzPjAw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I'm still planning to make this SVN change on Thursday this week. Ian, Owen, Todd, note the questions I ask you below. Can you help with these on Thursday? Thanks, Nige On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > All, > > As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing the re-organization of our svn layout: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday April 21 at 11am PDT. > > - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. > - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. > - I will run the script to make the changes. > - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? > - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users are taken care of at the same time? (what are these?) > > More info on this change is at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit > > Cheers, > Nige --Boundary_(ID_ft1ZFsw2HIiAU3NwCzPjAw)-- From general-return-3271-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 05:21:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 798008A4 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28786 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:21:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28745 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:21:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28737 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 05:21:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:21:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:21:02 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so597949bwz.35 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.39.68 with SMTP id f4mr5959775bke.17.1303276842155; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:20:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.38.14 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:20:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:20:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: Nigel Daley Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Ian Holsman , "Owen O'Malley" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec555571238816e04a152c93d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec555571238816e04a152c93d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm still planning to make this SVN change on Thursday this week. > > Ian, Owen, Todd, note the questions I ask you below. Can you help with > these on Thursday? > Unfortunately I'm out of the office most of the day on Thursday with a customer. I'll be available Thursday evening, though, to help with any cleanup/etc. I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-land. My guess is that there will be some disturbance to developers on Thurs afternoon / Friday as this gets sorted out, even if we try to plan as much as possible. Would it be better to do this on Friday so that we have the weekend to fix up broken pieces before people get to work on Monday? -Todd > On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > All, > > As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing the > re-organization of our svn layout: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday > April 21 at 11am PDT. > > - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. > - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. > - I will run the script to make the changes. > - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the > asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? > - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users are > taken care of at the same time? (what are these?) > > More info on this change is at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit > > Cheers, > Nige > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec555571238816e04a152c93d-- From general-return-3272-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 05:30:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D15E0EF2 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33150 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:30:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33105 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:30:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33097 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 05:30:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.94 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.94] (HELO asmtpout019.mac.com) (17.148.16.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:30:39 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.31] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp019.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJX0085URAGIR90@asmtp019.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:30:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-20_01:2011-04-20,2011-04-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104190133 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:30:16 -0700 Cc: Ian Holsman , Owen O'Malley Message-id: <2BA11C0A-DA91-4672-A558-B08F8275D100@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Todd Lipcon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I could start this at 2pm on Friday if that suited folks better. Nige On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I'm still planning to make this SVN change on Thursday this week. >> >> Ian, Owen, Todd, note the questions I ask you below. Can you help with >> these on Thursday? >> > > Unfortunately I'm out of the office most of the day on Thursday with a > customer. I'll be available Thursday evening, though, to help with any > cleanup/etc. > > I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-land. > > My guess is that there will be some disturbance to developers on Thurs > afternoon / Friday as this gets sorted out, even if we try to plan as much > as possible. Would it be better to do this on Friday so that we have the > weekend to fix up broken pieces before people get to work on Monday? > > -Todd > > >> On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> All, >> >> As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing the >> re-organization of our svn layout: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday >> April 21 at 11am PDT. >> >> - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. >> - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. >> - I will run the script to make the changes. >> - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the >> asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? >> - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users are >> taken care of at the same time? (what are these?) >> >> More info on this change is at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-3273-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 05:59:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A20429D for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63983 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63934 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 05:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63926 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 05:59:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:59:25 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so620086bwz.35 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.16.140 with SMTP id o12mr1448821bka.125.1303279144270; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:59:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.38.14 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:58:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:58:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: Nigel Daley Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Ian Holsman , "Owen O'Malley" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a16e6ffd7a04a15352e0 --00032555a16e6ffd7a04a15352e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-land. > Git-wise, I think we have two options: Option 1) - Create a new git mirror for the new hadoop/ tree. This will have no history. - On the Apache side, fetch the split-project git mirrors into the combined git mirror as branches - eg hadoop-hdfs.git:trunk becomes a branch named something like pre-HADOOP-7106/hdfs/trunk. Thus, when any user fetches, he'll get all the git objects from "prehistory" as well without having to add separate remotes. - Add a script or README file explaining how to set up git grafts on the combined hadoop.git so that the new combination branch "foo" looks like a merge of pre-HADOOP-7106/{hdfs,common,mapred}/foo. Since git grafts are local constructs, each git user would have to run this script once after checking out the git tree, after which the history would be "healed" Pros: - all existing sha1s stay the same. - Any local branches people might have for works in progress should continue to refer to proper SHA1s and should rebase relatively easily onto the combined trunk - Should be reasonably simple to implement Cons: - users have to run a script upon checkout in order to graft back together history Option 2) - Use git-filter-branch on the split repos to rewrite them as if they always took place in their new subdirectories. - Fetch these repos into the merged repo - Set up grafts in the merged repo - Run git-filter-branch --all in the merged repo, which will make the grafts permanent - May have to run git-filter-branch to rewrite some of the git-svn-info: commit messages to trick git-svn. This option basically rewrites history so that it looks like the original project split did what we're planning to do now. Pros: - we have a single cohesive git repo with no need to have users set up grafts Cons: - all of our SHA1s between the original split and now would change (making it harder to rebase local branches for example) - way more opportunity for error, I think. I'm leaning towards option 1 above, and happy to write the script which installs the grafts into the user's local repo. -Todd > >> On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> All, >> >> As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing the >> re-organization of our svn layout: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday >> April 21 at 11am PDT. >> >> - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. >> - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. >> - I will run the script to make the changes. >> - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the >> asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? >> - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users are >> taken care of at the same time? (what are these?) >> >> More info on this change is at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00032555a16e6ffd7a04a15352e0-- From general-return-3274-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 08:34:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61CEC11FC for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89096 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 08:07:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88490 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 08:07:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88469 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 08:07:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:07:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:07:35 +0000 Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so383846pzk.35 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.50.161 with SMTP id d1mr10440677pbo.439.1303286835022; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.59] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t9sm483677pbq.31.2011.04.20.01.07.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:07:11 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing = the re-organization of our svn layout: = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday = April 21 at 11am PDT. This is still premature. Your patch is out of date with respect to the current branches. Please = update it and upload a new version. What changes do we want to make to the asf-authorization file? Clearly = that needs to be decided before anything is done. What changes are we making to the notifications? That also hasn't been = discussed at all. Again, has anyone talked to Jukka and the rest of the infrastructure-dev = to see if there is anything that we need to do to minimize transition = pain? Clearly, the notifications for git.apache.org need to be = maintained, but I don't know if there are other actions that would help = minimize the data loss. Clearly any change where all of the git hashes change is massively = disruptive. I suspect there is some magic you can do to keep more of the = history, but I don't know the subversion-git bridge very well. -- Owen From general-return-3275-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 13:07:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1A33E02 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93545 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 13:07:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93480 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 13:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93468 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 13:07:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:07:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:07:31 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so836798vws.35 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:07:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=vIenxH9hYRPcicsYJxDnMS09yCkQahkMdkvcX3t8kvo=; b=Ufbzp0hHwCbjIVuD+fQIhw85Dm4yKtYKwTVAcK484NmmHNs8gwzu4eoTLdg3LSRYGg 6mIM9qUBP1RbRULOmGJeG0JoNOA897wigkuG5bPQ7AtOny6hSf36OWPrtcpGttXZrDVS kuiYj2jhXRUvrVJDVM5aeTf72IChfk16/tpAQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=F/aGzXGd/fy/OUTqle2f8IsqVQQt75ug+MDWZbMvOhCH8CFEE19oVr15Ro9UPUwlsO cAYliCkTpe4YQDV0s9MSLdiZrPM7m/WuL6K8lAxY76l+TRaLPSnQmDqyXrSrcgh7pbnW EuUyqbSF7scrtc+1KHC6eZQaJlTVlQlpUjxHU= Received: by 10.52.0.66 with SMTP id 2mr1415520vdc.308.1303304828687; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.111] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm503876vbz.8.2011.04.20.06.07.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:07:04 +0100 Cc: Nigel Daley , general@hadoop.apache.org, "Owen O'Malley" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> To: Todd Lipcon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm traveling at the moment (when am I not), and probably won't have = access until monday. I'll look at the files, and see if I can do some stuff today without = impacting anything. On Apr 20, 2011, at 6:58 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon = wrote: >=20 > I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in = Apache-land. >=20 > Git-wise, I think we have two options: >=20 > Option 1) > - Create a new git mirror for the new hadoop/ tree. This will have no = history. > - On the Apache side, fetch the split-project git mirrors into the = combined git mirror as branches - eg hadoop-hdfs.git:trunk becomes a = branch named something like pre-HADOOP-7106/hdfs/trunk. Thus, when any = user fetches, he'll get all the git objects from "prehistory" as well = without having to add separate remotes. > - Add a script or README file explaining how to set up git grafts on = the combined hadoop.git so that the new combination branch "foo" looks = like a merge of pre-HADOOP-7106/{hdfs,common,mapred}/foo. Since git = grafts are local constructs, each git user would have to run this script = once after checking out the git tree, after which the history would be = "healed" >=20 > Pros: > - all existing sha1s stay the same. > - Any local branches people might have for works in progress should = continue to refer to proper SHA1s and should rebase relatively easily = onto the combined trunk > - Should be reasonably simple to implement >=20 > Cons: > - users have to run a script upon checkout in order to graft back = together history >=20 > Option 2) > - Use git-filter-branch on the split repos to rewrite them as if they = always took place in their new subdirectories. > - Fetch these repos into the merged repo > - Set up grafts in the merged repo > - Run git-filter-branch --all in the merged repo, which will make the = grafts permanent > - May have to run git-filter-branch to rewrite some of the = git-svn-info: commit messages to trick git-svn. >=20 > This option basically rewrites history so that it looks like the = original project split did what we're planning to do now. >=20 > Pros: > - we have a single cohesive git repo with no need to have users set = up grafts >=20 > Cons: > - all of our SHA1s between the original split and now would change = (making it harder to rebase local branches for example) > - way more opportunity for error, I think. >=20 > I'm leaning towards option 1 above, and happy to write the script = which installs the grafts into the user's local repo. >=20 > -Todd >=20 > =20 > On Apr 9, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> All,=20 >>=20 >> As discussed in Jan/Feb, I'd like to coordinate a date for committing = the re-organization of our svn layout: = https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106. I propose Thursday = April 21 at 11am PDT. >>=20 >> - I will send out reminders leading up to that date. >> - I will announce on IRC when I'm about to start the changes. >> - I will run the script to make the changes. >> - Ian, can you update the asf-authorization-template file and the = asf-mailer.conf files at the same time? >> - Owen/Todd/Jukka, can you make sure that actions needed by git users = are taken care of at the same time? (what are these?) >>=20 >> More info on this change is at = http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman To know recursion, you must first know recursion. From general-return-3276-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 15:00:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8070E179A for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51574 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 15:00:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51495 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 15:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51485 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 15:00:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:00:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:00:41 +0000 Received: by pwi14 with SMTP id 14so615734pwi.35 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.41.67 with SMTP id d3mr9973231pbl.287.1303311620580; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.59] (c-98-234-216-58.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7sm678039pbc.36.2011.04.20.08.00.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Owen O'Malley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:00:16 -0700 Cc: Nigel Daley , Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in = Apache-land. Uh, why isn't infra-dev on this thread? For those on infra-dev, the context is that Nigel is trying to merge = together the source trees of the Hadoop sub-projects that were split = apart 2 years ago. So he is taking: prefix =3D http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/ $prefix/common/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/common $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/hdfs $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/mapreduce and play similar games with the rest of the branches and tags. For more = details look at HADOOP-7106. =46rom the project split, subversion was able to track the history = across the subversion moves between projects, but not git. Four questions: 1. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? 2. Are we going to be able to preserve our sha's or are they going to = change again? 3. What changes do we need to make to the subversion notification file? 4. Are there any other changes that need to be coordinated? After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive = move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce = back in: $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 = branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for = hdfs and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git = clone. -- Owen From general-return-3277-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 15:52:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D510F177E for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49370 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 15:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49298 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 15:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17697 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 15:33:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I8s326SR6mXUNVlt21aRlXViK2id+e7xuzy924DMA4s=; b=F+iYXMtk7vNw2/mvVg7pA0V0yV2V1VTZNoaZE8Vyqild+4UYpISw2hPBwneEOv5UrF AoHVGLzoKzxdORRGok8dZPVY1tjV9dT/PxX7YWweFcvUmlywdHdX+DVYEhYlYbC5hH6Z 5+o5u+F6EXZb5XGdHTxz+ZDYjAOt5UOPBZw+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lvhYDszeo9CAvwD3L3OajJmfuS8ozB3muwsc/cXFFh7+dAxnJkRcf+8H9CCn28YAOH FET75zg+uZLAe9olRUHL2HmSAavZ0Bt+DEZtzdHPJU4/IBFpZ0MINHhPok5CsrlNT9f3 OCHnHqzyV8EfywwmdA24ABUnhWMAYaekhEo1Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> From: Paul Davis Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:32:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Nigel Daley , Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From the project split, subversion was able to track the history across t= he subversion moves between projects, but not git. > > Four questions: > =A01. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? Glancing at the Git history on GitHub for Hadoop HDFS my guess is that the mirror script is just pulling from $prefix/hdfs. I'm not entirely certain how promiscuous it'll look for movements from elsewhere in the svn repo for history outside the root URL. If you're really wanting to make sure to keep the history in Git intact my suggestion would be to setup a temporary svn server locally and test our mirroring scripts against the commands you intend to run. Paul Davis From general-return-3278-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 20 19:27:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B012E108A for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81319 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 19:27:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81266 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2011 19:27:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81258 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2011 19:27:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:27:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:27:02 +0000 Received: by pwi14 with SMTP id 14so794027pwi.35 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.38.226 with SMTP id j2mr4657455pbk.471.1303327601144; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.51.136 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:26:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:26:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "Owen O'Malley" , Nigel Daley , Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:00, Owen O'Malley wrote: > After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce back in: > > $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* > $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs > $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce This seems like adding an insult to injury by creating an artificial SVN layout and moving what deemed to be an unrelated components into common's namespace. The original proposal seems much more straight forward. Cos > This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for hdfs and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git clone. > > -- Owen > From general-return-3279-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 21 04:43:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 406972D8E for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35856 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 04:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34982 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 04:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34965 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2011 04:43:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:43:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:43:12 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.8] ([71.198.193.36]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJZ00C3CJQQK930@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:42:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-20_09:2011-04-21,2011-04-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104200162 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:42:26 -0700 Cc: Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Message-id: <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Owen, I'll admit I'm not familiar with all the git details/issues in your proposal, but I think the layout change you propose is fine and seems to solve the git issues with very minimal impact on the layout. Let's shoot for doing this next Friday, April 29 at 2pm PDT. I'll update the patch and send out a reminder about this later next week. Thanks, Nige On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-land. > > Uh, why isn't infra-dev on this thread? > > For those on infra-dev, the context is that Nigel is trying to merge together the source trees of the Hadoop sub-projects that were split apart 2 years ago. So he is taking: > > prefix = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/ > > $prefix/common/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/common > $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/hdfs > $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/mapreduce > > and play similar games with the rest of the branches and tags. For more details look at HADOOP-7106. > > From the project split, subversion was able to track the history across the subversion moves between projects, but not git. > > Four questions: > 1. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? > 2. Are we going to be able to preserve our sha's or are they going to change again? > 3. What changes do we need to make to the subversion notification file? > 4. Are there any other changes that need to be coordinated? > > After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce back in: > > $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* > $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs > $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce > > This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for hdfs and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git clone. > > -- Owen > > From general-return-3280-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 21 10:34:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D071A2F3E for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81091 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 10:34:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81024 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 10:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81015 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2011 10:33:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:33:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:33:53 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1178960qwj.35 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:33:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=F83oq1QZq+AYowDgmu9CGckdqvBZ1D+p+R3rOy5YZck=; b=XREqemGO7FE+PfDe8VEGYD/0HWEzI4uOsv/aHyq45y8esbmZQk4q0ODEs/a6BEq5SL pt97V1dfyzN0gHWpdtwtbvuR0w5SW4qzOxFxCeytz7AfDTYO2yRG8xZzA46a7onPzkTQ vMKnBcsPZI9zy18OWsUXI5WTESrT3tVzIOTYQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=ZeBrDwQbMqvm6ii+YWoZ3mNKnWZ3FL9pKlnt5lOdfwi9NysJ9ubI08id93ZNVy825P FASO8n5/dnkP4mel+eWjl/YhXH8ySLTxEEFGUdfo7d3eZhf5uAweda3wO9pJkQqF4I2r bcLBedNeOhWR7T/P2JJdly2KfozhdjTFRit4s= Received: by 10.229.74.206 with SMTP id v14mr6181434qcj.69.1303382012050; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.172.0.111] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm1285978qco.25.2011.04.21.03.33.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:33:27 +0100 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, "Owen O'Malley" , Nigel Daley , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2F4D07A8-7934-4B89-BB04-E81BE588E657@holsman.net> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> To: Konstantin Boudnik X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) the other issue is when you create a branch, as you would need to update = the SVN/mail configs to add each branch independently.. unless you can = do wildcard matching in the config files.. infra??? can you do this? On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:00, Owen O'Malley = wrote: >> After considering it this morning, I believe that the least = disruptive move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and = mapreduce back in: >>=20 >> $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* >> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs >> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce >=20 > This seems like adding an insult to injury by creating an artificial > SVN layout and moving what deemed to be an unrelated components into > common's namespace. >=20 > The original proposal seems much more straight forward. >=20 > Cos >=20 >> This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 = branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for = hdfs and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git = clone. >>=20 >> -- Owen >=20 >>=20 -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman =93If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called = research, would it?=94 =96 Albert Einstein From general-return-3281-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 21 16:53:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABEA922BE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57574 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 16:53:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57528 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2011 16:53:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57520 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2011 16:53:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:53:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:52:54 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Tt4YJAWE8XG9YpsnbcUAt2p6J73gIRqFgmNTcWyip8Gg3gODje9LtW+c t4h6cBMGp647kRJNkexC8VNW+GxpbDbVH72Ebkz4pwPEXbaHV15ZgIsd7 7WlRJV+Dh9K8pkl; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1303404774; x=1334940774; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20hod=20Common=20contr ib|Date:=20Thu,=2021=20Apr=202011=2016:55:37=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<0DCCF5A1-48A5-42B5-B609-BCB81E3D8948@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<3683620D169183489F4FA6EB4984EC35@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20<84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063 E@linkedin.com>|References:=20=0D=0A=20<84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBF CE3D063E@linkedin.com>; bh=MJyYxoy7rDizGslq3mw1Y23ec0SaFCw0T8CXMoijj24=; b=yn40LySsgh8+8LQ3BAhjZ3bGMLs8tjj/xcmgxg+KH8iRbE3AqjfSAMNm 0witzcSTovKMq2Ah7/RUQ+twrCsotJbZh9p+H/g8Tti07U66hTyeJHHlS 9fmlH3IGN8Z/ST6; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,252,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="22420310" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:55:38 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyZbt98XqvxdoQkW+Mjf3xnP4gZP9GkiAgGxQ6YA= Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:55:37 +0000 Message-ID: <0DCCF5A1-48A5-42B5-B609-BCB81E3D8948@linkedin.com> References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3683620D169183489F4FA6EB4984EC35@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 > On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's l= ast meaningful contribution was February 2009: >>=20 >> HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop servic= es provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. >>=20 >> There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Avai= lable since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). >=20 > -1 I'm removing my -1 to make this a +/-0.=20 Do what you want. From general-return-3282-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 27 12:20:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 356332669 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75497 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 12:20:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75417 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 12:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75408 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2011 12:20:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:20:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:20:17 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1008306qwj.35 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:references:to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=oPpsU/UJv+GLB7/bQr4mqUYISHTCX+caNc+8G5oc4UY=; b=d2IVoX3JYVvnEOOZd7qt8R6bbpbr0xe+AlVVhKW6qOHFkJfNeYKPaM43Fput5Ww2cY kLCsbH7WblkjowVt9vT5StG+kkmTjN+C8g2j4zRzVF+sxnAp6BnFwtZWqNS9sBncpu0T aGvZ7mlcQ6Fz6+On13yqiikIL3ACws8/Xa+/M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=J1vulXWObnMkx22j3KPnMR0mMDWXxP8x7qAPf+gJtUynJnhYibZfxmWE0vbKGkUwzC 3ugQ7FE+TQ7TBA6jDKJ+Q9rN6W3izfBmCadFsBVBYqAQSkIRiNyWuur86vfBM/AXstfq Ci3mqTv7p/Cm6IWIdwoUTl2O/OSFwbKcuO+1g= Received: by 10.229.56.148 with SMTP id y20mr1630610qcg.283.1303906796515; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from malinux.office.aol.com (h-64-236-128-42.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm536193qco.37.2011.04.27.05.19.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:19:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: removing old releases Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:19:54 -0400 References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) I've had a look at hadoop's dist area = (http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/ )=20 and was wondering which of these people think we should do here. If no one objects within a week, I will remove everything except the = hadoop-0.20.2,=20 hadoop-21.0, and stable directories there. Thanks Ian Begin forwarded message: > From: Mark Thomas > Date: April 27, 2011 8:07:53 AM EDT > Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] www.apache.org/dist/ housekeeping >=20 > PMC members, >=20 > Six weeks ago, the infrastructure team sent you the e-mail below. To = the > projects that were already following the release guidelines and to = those > projects that have since cleaned up their /dist area - thank you. The > infrastructure team really does appreciate you doing this. >=20 > Regrettably, a large number of PMCs have chosen to ignore the message > below. To those PMCs, you have one month (until 31 May 2011) to clean = up > your dist area or the infrastructure team will simply remove all files > that are more than twelve months old. >=20 > Mark > on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >=20 > On 10/03/2011 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >> PMC members, >>=20 >> As the ASF grows in size, so does the total size of the distribution >> artefacts we ask our mirror community to support for us. The larger = this >> total size, the greater the strain on both ASF infrastructure and on = the >> mirroring system. >>=20 >> As per the release guidelines [1], only current releases should be >> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/. Monitoring of >> http://www.apache.org/dist/ [2] shows that some projects are not >> removing old releases. This is placing an unnecessary strain on both = ASF >> infrastructure and on our mirror volunteers. >>=20 >> Thanks to those PMCs that have been removing old releases from their >> distribution directory. The infrastructure appreciates you keeping on >> top of this. >>=20 >> PMCs that have not been removing old releases are required to review >> their current distribution directory and remove any old releases. >> - PMCs using svnpubsub should remove old releases via svn. >> - PMCs not using svnpubsub should remove old releases directly from >> /www/www.apache.org/dist/ on people.apache.org at. Note that any >> deletions may take up to 24 hours to replicate to = http://www.apache.org/dist >> In both cases it may take longer for changes to replicate to mirrors. >>=20 >> Old releases removed from http://www.apache.org/dist/ are not lost. >> Release are automatically copied to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ = and >> are never deleted. >>=20 >> This inevitably raises the question what is a current release and = what >> is an old release. To some extent, this varies from project to = project >> but typically it amounts to the following: >> a) latest release of the current branch >> b) latest stable release of the current branch >> c) latest stable release of previous branches >>=20 >> It is hard to give concrete examples that apply to all projects since >> each project is free to use its own release numbering scheme. = However, a >> project that includes versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in its release >> directory almost certainly has some cleaning up to do. A project that >> includes 1.0.6, 1.1.5 and 2.0.7 probably doesn't. >>=20 >> If you have any questions about how to manage your distribution >> directory please contact the infrastructure team. >>=20 >> Thanks in advance, >>=20 >> Mark >> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>=20 >>=20 >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/tlps/ >=20 >=20 >=20 -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not = believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard From general-return-3283-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 27 20:37:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F63A66A for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31877 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 20:37:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31811 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 20:37:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31803 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2011 20:37:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:37:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:37:41 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1383444qyk.14 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:37:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=yl1MWs1cNBec+cPIML2gAA6bhS+JVk/CpoHL91ezeWQ=; b=XLnAKRE3sFubWBhgHXdlst+FuysHXOiM3wsbMCmMHqqTnAzr1xZmp8ztONKaR1yctq 6bkh+bJuv3h3/WFLV7BR58Tt+ukfyUbl9WzBui07Bi+LbokvQsClDm1pG8NQX1QdcVrp HTflQHk8z8XV1cwf6ZgZvIEBVn7x321cPSvSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=RelWsTBAZCBFNic2765X9avXUIscBZ4FCw2JM13o23chj2TYtqRSHSq8kUXJWUsf3I 3BhzMYOQmfIozTzEJYs97FU2U9tHgNmTYcMYvlTrVrZVc/yWCunEWG+pgV8F3JwFWvgI eH/5Z8xwJf6OTN/AFWDseLf0pSO1hu6cU4Mt0= Received: by 10.229.20.77 with SMTP id e13mr2143512qcb.193.1303936638047; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.180.150.116] (h-64-236-128-40.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm817114qck.32.2011.04.27.13.37.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: removing old releases From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:37:15 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1BF00F04-E81D-4A10-93CE-2F2E29973DD1@Holsman.NET> References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org just to clarify.. there is a archive area - = http://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/core/ where old releases are kept, = so we are not deleting anything forever, just not having it available = via the mirrors and taking up valuable diskspace etc etc. On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I've had a look at hadoop's dist area = (http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/ )=20 > and was wondering which of these people think we should do here. >=20 > If no one objects within a week, I will remove everything except the = hadoop-0.20.2,=20 > hadoop-21.0, and stable directories there. >=20 > Thanks > Ian >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 >> From: Mark Thomas >> Date: April 27, 2011 8:07:53 AM EDT >> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] www.apache.org/dist/ housekeeping >>=20 >=20 >> PMC members, >>=20 >> Six weeks ago, the infrastructure team sent you the e-mail below. To = the >> projects that were already following the release guidelines and to = those >> projects that have since cleaned up their /dist area - thank you. The >> infrastructure team really does appreciate you doing this. >>=20 >> Regrettably, a large number of PMCs have chosen to ignore the message >> below. To those PMCs, you have one month (until 31 May 2011) to clean = up >> your dist area or the infrastructure team will simply remove all = files >> that are more than twelve months old. >>=20 >> Mark >> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>=20 >> On 10/03/2011 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> PMC members, >>>=20 >>> As the ASF grows in size, so does the total size of the distribution >>> artefacts we ask our mirror community to support for us. The larger = this >>> total size, the greater the strain on both ASF infrastructure and on = the >>> mirroring system. >>>=20 >>> As per the release guidelines [1], only current releases should be >>> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/. Monitoring of >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/ [2] shows that some projects are not >>> removing old releases. This is placing an unnecessary strain on both = ASF >>> infrastructure and on our mirror volunteers. >>>=20 >>> Thanks to those PMCs that have been removing old releases from their >>> distribution directory. The infrastructure appreciates you keeping = on >>> top of this. >>>=20 >>> PMCs that have not been removing old releases are required to review >>> their current distribution directory and remove any old releases. >>> - PMCs using svnpubsub should remove old releases via svn. >>> - PMCs not using svnpubsub should remove old releases directly from >>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/ on people.apache.org at. Note that = any >>> deletions may take up to 24 hours to replicate to = http://www.apache.org/dist >>> In both cases it may take longer for changes to replicate to = mirrors. >>>=20 >>> Old releases removed from http://www.apache.org/dist/ are not lost. >>> Release are automatically copied to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ = and >>> are never deleted. >>>=20 >>> This inevitably raises the question what is a current release and = what >>> is an old release. To some extent, this varies from project to = project >>> but typically it amounts to the following: >>> a) latest release of the current branch >>> b) latest stable release of the current branch >>> c) latest stable release of previous branches >>>=20 >>> It is hard to give concrete examples that apply to all projects = since >>> each project is free to use its own release numbering scheme. = However, a >>> project that includes versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in its release >>> directory almost certainly has some cleaning up to do. A project = that >>> includes 1.0.6, 1.1.5 and 2.0.7 probably doesn't. >>>=20 >>> If you have any questions about how to manage your distribution >>> directory please contact the infrastructure team. >>>=20 >>> Thanks in advance, >>>=20 >>> Mark >>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/tlps/ >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > -- > Ian Holsman > Ian@Holsman.net > PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >=20 > Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not = believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3284-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 27 21:01:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59CF5EE2 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77534 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 21:01:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77470 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 21:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77462 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2011 21:01:02 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:01:02 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so2678907iwr.35 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.61.65 with SMTP id s1mr2025083ibh.120.1303938061837; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.166.76 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:01:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing old releases From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No need to wait a week, if you have time to clear it out. Thanks for taking care of this, Ian. -C On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I've had a look at hadoop's dist area (http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/ ) > and was wondering which of these people think we should do here. > > If no one objects within a week, I will remove everything except the hadoop-0.20.2, > hadoop-21.0, and stable directories there. > > Thanks > Ian > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Mark Thomas >> Date: April 27, 2011 8:07:53 AM EDT >> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] www.apache.org/dist/ housekeeping >> > >> PMC members, >> >> Six weeks ago, the infrastructure team sent you the e-mail below. To the >> projects that were already following the release guidelines and to those >> projects that have since cleaned up their /dist area - thank you. The >> infrastructure team really does appreciate you doing this. >> >> Regrettably, a large number of PMCs have chosen to ignore the message >> below. To those PMCs, you have one month (until 31 May 2011) to clean up >> your dist area or the infrastructure team will simply remove all files >> that are more than twelve months old. >> >> Mark >> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >> >> On 10/03/2011 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> PMC members, >>> >>> As the ASF grows in size, so does the total size of the distribution >>> artefacts we ask our mirror community to support for us. The larger this >>> total size, the greater the strain on both ASF infrastructure and on the >>> mirroring system. >>> >>> As per the release guidelines [1], only current releases should be >>> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/. Monitoring of >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/ [2] shows that some projects are not >>> removing old releases. This is placing an unnecessary strain on both ASF >>> infrastructure and on our mirror volunteers. >>> >>> Thanks to those PMCs that have been removing old releases from their >>> distribution directory. The infrastructure appreciates you keeping on >>> top of this. >>> >>> PMCs that have not been removing old releases are required to review >>> their current distribution directory and remove any old releases. >>> - PMCs using svnpubsub should remove old releases via svn. >>> - PMCs not using svnpubsub should remove old releases directly from >>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/ on people.apache.org at. Note that any >>> deletions may take up to 24 hours to replicate to http://www.apache.org/dist >>> In both cases it may take longer for changes to replicate to mirrors. >>> >>> Old releases removed from http://www.apache.org/dist/ are not lost. >>> Release are automatically copied to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ and >>> are never deleted. >>> >>> This inevitably raises the question what is a current release and what >>> is an old release. To some extent, this varies from project to project >>> but typically it amounts to the following: >>> a) latest release of the current branch >>> b) latest stable release of the current branch >>> c) latest stable release of previous branches >>> >>> It is hard to give concrete examples that apply to all projects since >>> each project is free to use its own release numbering scheme. However, a >>> project that includes versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in its release >>> directory almost certainly has some cleaning up to do. A project that >>> includes 1.0.6, 1.1.5 and 2.0.7 probably doesn't. >>> >>> If you have any questions about how to manage your distribution >>> directory please contact the infrastructure team. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Mark >>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/tlps/ >> >> >> > > -- > Ian Holsman > Ian@Holsman.net > PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman > > Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard > > > > > From general-return-3285-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 27 22:06:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DED52335 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74218 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 22:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74167 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2011 22:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74159 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2011 22:06:25 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:06:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:06:25 +0000 Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1433058qyk.14 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.106.214 with SMTP id y22mr2136340qco.105.1303941984235; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.131 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:06:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing old releases From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002354470558c732ff04a1eda6ae --002354470558c732ff04a1eda6ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > No need to wait a week, if you have time to clear it out. Thanks for > taking care of this, Ian. +1 on cleaning it up now. I doubt that there would be any debate that the "current" releases are 0.20.2 and 0.21.0. Also removing the ex-subprojects can proceed immediately as none of those releases are current either. --002354470558c732ff04a1eda6ae-- From general-return-3286-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 28 06:02:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B19F9976 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3522 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 06:02:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3467 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 06:02:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3437 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2011 06:02:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:02:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:02:35 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.8] ([71.198.193.36]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LKC00IZ9M3PCV10@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:02:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-28_03:2011-04-27,2011-04-28,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104270211 Subject: Re: removing old releases From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:02:13 -0700 Message-id: <678B57E6-0F3E-4081-B92E-CCF4ADC10B7F@mac.com> References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Thanks Ian. n. On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > No need to wait a week, if you have time to clear it out. Thanks for > taking care of this, Ian. -C > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> I've had a look at hadoop's dist area (http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/ ) >> and was wondering which of these people think we should do here. >> >> If no one objects within a week, I will remove everything except the hadoop-0.20.2, >> hadoop-21.0, and stable directories there. >> >> Thanks >> Ian >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Mark Thomas >>> Date: April 27, 2011 8:07:53 AM EDT >>> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] www.apache.org/dist/ housekeeping >>> >> >>> PMC members, >>> >>> Six weeks ago, the infrastructure team sent you the e-mail below. To the >>> projects that were already following the release guidelines and to those >>> projects that have since cleaned up their /dist area - thank you. The >>> infrastructure team really does appreciate you doing this. >>> >>> Regrettably, a large number of PMCs have chosen to ignore the message >>> below. To those PMCs, you have one month (until 31 May 2011) to clean up >>> your dist area or the infrastructure team will simply remove all files >>> that are more than twelve months old. >>> >>> Mark >>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>> >>> On 10/03/2011 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >>>> PMC members, >>>> >>>> As the ASF grows in size, so does the total size of the distribution >>>> artefacts we ask our mirror community to support for us. The larger this >>>> total size, the greater the strain on both ASF infrastructure and on the >>>> mirroring system. >>>> >>>> As per the release guidelines [1], only current releases should be >>>> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/. Monitoring of >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/ [2] shows that some projects are not >>>> removing old releases. This is placing an unnecessary strain on both ASF >>>> infrastructure and on our mirror volunteers. >>>> >>>> Thanks to those PMCs that have been removing old releases from their >>>> distribution directory. The infrastructure appreciates you keeping on >>>> top of this. >>>> >>>> PMCs that have not been removing old releases are required to review >>>> their current distribution directory and remove any old releases. >>>> - PMCs using svnpubsub should remove old releases via svn. >>>> - PMCs not using svnpubsub should remove old releases directly from >>>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/ on people.apache.org at. Note that any >>>> deletions may take up to 24 hours to replicate to http://www.apache.org/dist >>>> In both cases it may take longer for changes to replicate to mirrors. >>>> >>>> Old releases removed from http://www.apache.org/dist/ are not lost. >>>> Release are automatically copied to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ and >>>> are never deleted. >>>> >>>> This inevitably raises the question what is a current release and what >>>> is an old release. To some extent, this varies from project to project >>>> but typically it amounts to the following: >>>> a) latest release of the current branch >>>> b) latest stable release of the current branch >>>> c) latest stable release of previous branches >>>> >>>> It is hard to give concrete examples that apply to all projects since >>>> each project is free to use its own release numbering scheme. However, a >>>> project that includes versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in its release >>>> directory almost certainly has some cleaning up to do. A project that >>>> includes 1.0.6, 1.1.5 and 2.0.7 probably doesn't. >>>> >>>> If you have any questions about how to manage your distribution >>>> directory please contact the infrastructure team. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/tlps/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ian Holsman >> Ian@Holsman.net >> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >> >> Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard >> >> >> >> >> From general-return-3287-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 28 13:46:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F405E3E9D for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32398 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 13:46:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32316 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 13:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32308 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2011 13:46:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:46:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:46:02 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3179189vws.35 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.70.171 with SMTP id n11mr4882490vdu.53.1303998340750; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.52.156.163 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:45:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:45:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HfItWbIDet90hGiTcHNMnTRsK_g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Any one is willing to take a look at the patch? Pretty straightforward... -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 13:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have submitted for enabling Sonar analysis on HDFS code. Would > appreciate if someone takes a look so we can move forward with it > (HDFS-1741). > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:30, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> I have looked around Apache's Sonar server and it seems to be >> sufficient to just have a correct pom.xml in place. I have opened >> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1741 >> Will attend to it shortly. >> -- >> =A0 Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:06, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> Hi Ian. >>> >>> yes, Sonar needs to have a pom'ed project. In case of an ant build >>> such a pom can be created to 'wrap' around build.xml and is usually >>> quite simple to manufacture. I have done it in the past for some HDFS >>> experiments without much of a hassle. >>> >>> Here's the example: >>> =A0http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Analyse+with+Maven >>> in "Analyze projects which are not built with Maven" section. >>> >>> There's one more caveat though: handling of unit tests reports. It can >>> be done with some new features Sonar has. See here: >>> =A0http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/ant/ >>> >>> I can quickly provide a working fixture to add say HDFS into Sonar as >>> a starter. Pl. let me know where it needs to be put (perhaps a JIRA >>> with a patch would do to?). >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this, >>> =A0Cos >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 06:10, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>> Hi Cos. >>>> apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. >>>> I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. >>>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ian, >>>>> >>>>> Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late >>>>> 2009, I believe. =A0I had asked =A0INFRA folks on a few occasions abo= ut >>>>> adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything >>>>> back. >>>>> >>>>> I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen eve= ntually. >>>>> -- >>>>> =A0 Thanks in advance, >>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>>> I just discovered this Apache site, >>>>>> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it = looks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>>>>> >>>>>> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put = the hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Ian >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ian Holsman >>>>>> Ian@Holsman.net >>>>>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>>>>> >>>>>> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-3288-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 28 13:49:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A185D3C1F for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34882 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 13:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34819 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 13:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34811 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2011 13:49:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:23 +0000 Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1799225qwj.35 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=BE+kHZqBYtKF0dd4XbppdN02XXwtBfRVMdbfLYPWaVA=; b=vLoVlki3l0PR8K4L2ErpJblwiU6oaqEPu36R+G1JBIBKOzvkupLvKDt5rujdRdtZZS HfTwMbvW2PaXbsYdtgzkkUUNzAihsgt8p2uTOl+6JMcTdyOrewD9ZVtZ+upsTCS4WhxB 9FplEmPVCeHHYDBeqBo/XDvT2ejaNqhYqqGZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=MfPxTYjVBHCVrKibsI1/l5vOlEOs9Ws71kBY3FT3A00e0trL2sX5to/l2Gt5EnYQTB xLNqcO2xDZne7DI+WB+xduCgEb/2r+yLRnfNuD18hK2yoab0zJYa/9oNqdf+PmsbtbJS jRVcweKjSSazl5hqcBQxhfEAXuXOaoiWxhD7A= Received: by 10.224.126.221 with SMTP id d29mr2763378qas.201.1303998542495; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.180.150.116] (h-64-236-128-40.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm1310637qck.32.2011.04.28.06.49.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: removing old releases From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <678B57E6-0F3E-4081-B92E-CCF4ADC10B7F@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:49:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4DB80719.10903@apache.org> <7CD77ED8-72DC-4A09-BA34-B08B74B9D592@Holsman.net> <678B57E6-0F3E-4081-B92E-CCF4ADC10B7F@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org and done. I left chukwa 0.4.0 there as they are currently pointing to it on their = release page. On Apr 28, 2011, at 2:02 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. Thanks Ian. >=20 > n. >=20 > On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >=20 >> No need to wait a week, if you have time to clear it out. Thanks for >> taking care of this, Ian. -C >>=20 >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> I've had a look at hadoop's dist area = (http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/ ) >>> and was wondering which of these people think we should do here. >>>=20 >>> If no one objects within a week, I will remove everything except the = hadoop-0.20.2, >>> hadoop-21.0, and stable directories there. >>>=20 >>> Thanks >>> Ian >>>=20 >>> Begin forwarded message: >>>=20 >>>> From: Mark Thomas >>>> Date: April 27, 2011 8:07:53 AM EDT >>>> Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] www.apache.org/dist/ = housekeeping >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> PMC members, >>>>=20 >>>> Six weeks ago, the infrastructure team sent you the e-mail below. = To the >>>> projects that were already following the release guidelines and to = those >>>> projects that have since cleaned up their /dist area - thank you. = The >>>> infrastructure team really does appreciate you doing this. >>>>=20 >>>> Regrettably, a large number of PMCs have chosen to ignore the = message >>>> below. To those PMCs, you have one month (until 31 May 2011) to = clean up >>>> your dist area or the infrastructure team will simply remove all = files >>>> that are more than twelve months old. >>>>=20 >>>> Mark >>>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>>>=20 >>>> On 10/03/2011 08:16, Mark Thomas wrote: >>>>> PMC members, >>>>>=20 >>>>> As the ASF grows in size, so does the total size of the = distribution >>>>> artefacts we ask our mirror community to support for us. The = larger this >>>>> total size, the greater the strain on both ASF infrastructure and = on the >>>>> mirroring system. >>>>>=20 >>>>> As per the release guidelines [1], only current releases should be >>>>> available at http://www.apache.org/dist/. Monitoring of >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/ [2] shows that some projects are not >>>>> removing old releases. This is placing an unnecessary strain on = both ASF >>>>> infrastructure and on our mirror volunteers. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks to those PMCs that have been removing old releases from = their >>>>> distribution directory. The infrastructure appreciates you keeping = on >>>>> top of this. >>>>>=20 >>>>> PMCs that have not been removing old releases are required to = review >>>>> their current distribution directory and remove any old releases. >>>>> - PMCs using svnpubsub should remove old releases via svn. >>>>> - PMCs not using svnpubsub should remove old releases directly = from >>>>> /www/www.apache.org/dist/ on people.apache.org at. Note that = any >>>>> deletions may take up to 24 hours to replicate to = http://www.apache.org/dist >>>>> In both cases it may take longer for changes to replicate to = mirrors. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Old releases removed from http://www.apache.org/dist/ are not = lost. >>>>> Release are automatically copied to = http://archive.apache.org/dist/ and >>>>> are never deleted. >>>>>=20 >>>>> This inevitably raises the question what is a current release and = what >>>>> is an old release. To some extent, this varies from project to = project >>>>> but typically it amounts to the following: >>>>> a) latest release of the current branch >>>>> b) latest stable release of the current branch >>>>> c) latest stable release of previous branches >>>>>=20 >>>>> It is hard to give concrete examples that apply to all projects = since >>>>> each project is free to use its own release numbering scheme. = However, a >>>>> project that includes versions 2.1.0, 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 in its = release >>>>> directory almost certainly has some cleaning up to do. A project = that >>>>> includes 1.0.6, 1.1.5 and 2.0.7 probably doesn't. >>>>>=20 >>>>> If you have any questions about how to manage your distribution >>>>> directory please contact the infrastructure team. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Mark >>>>> on behalf of the ASF Infrastructure Team >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/tlps/ >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Ian Holsman >>> Ian@Holsman.net >>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>>=20 >>> Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will = not believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-3289-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 28 22:50:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E444F3B90 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16171 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 22:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16113 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2011 22:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16105 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2011 22:50:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:50:16 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so3808198vxa.35 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:49:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.184.98 with SMTP id et2mr446559vdc.285.1304030995397; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.111.131 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:49:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <597116E4-1991-43A6-B35B-BAA9F577897E@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:49:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Sonar - http://analysis.apache.org/ does anyone want hadoop in there? From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I replied on jira. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Any one is willing to take a look at the patch? Pretty straightforward... > -- > =A0 Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 13:17, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> I have submitted for enabling Sonar analysis on HDFS code. Would >> appreciate if someone takes a look so we can move forward with it >> (HDFS-1741). >> -- >> =A0 Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:30, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> I have looked around Apache's Sonar server and it seems to be >>> sufficient to just have a correct pom.xml in place. I have opened >>> =A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1741 >>> Will attend to it shortly. >>> -- >>> =A0 Take care, >>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 08:06, Konstantin Boudnik wrote= : >>>> Hi Ian. >>>> >>>> yes, Sonar needs to have a pom'ed project. In case of an ant build >>>> such a pom can be created to 'wrap' around build.xml and is usually >>>> quite simple to manufacture. I have done it in the past for some HDFS >>>> experiments without much of a hassle. >>>> >>>> Here's the example: >>>> =A0http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Analyse+with+Maven >>>> in "Analyze projects which are not built with Maven" section. >>>> >>>> There's one more caveat though: handling of unit tests reports. It can >>>> be done with some new features Sonar has. See here: >>>> =A0http://www.sonarsource.org/tag/ant/ >>>> >>>> I can quickly provide a working fixture to add say HDFS into Sonar as >>>> a starter. Pl. let me know where it needs to be put (perhaps a JIRA >>>> with a patch would do to?). >>>> >>>> Thanks for looking into this, >>>> =A0Cos >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 06:10, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>> Hi Cos. >>>>> apparently they can't build from ant in the current version. >>>>> I'll need to have a look at it.. they sent me some info. >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 3, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ian, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sonar was around for a while and Apache has this setup since late >>>>>> 2009, I believe. =A0I had asked =A0INFRA folks on a few occasions ab= out >>>>>> adding Hadoop repos to their installation, but never heard anything >>>>>> back. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd be awesome if you can talk to the right people so it'd happen ev= entually. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> =A0 Thanks in advance, >>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 05:59, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>>>> I just discovered this Apache site, >>>>>>> Apache Sonar performs source code analysis on the java code, and it= looks pretty, and I'm sure some people would find it useful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If people are interested I can start putting finding out how to put= the hadoop code in there, so we can get stats on our own code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Ian >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Ian Holsman >>>>>>> Ian@Holsman.net >>>>>>> PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To know recursion, you must first know recursion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-3290-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 05:08:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89DB628A3 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19880 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 05:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19697 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 05:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19684 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 05:08:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:08:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:07:54 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.8] ([71.198.193.36]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LKE001H6E7J0340@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:06:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-29_03:2011-04-28,2011-04-29,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104280218 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:06:55 -0700 Cc: Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Message-id: <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Owen O'Malley , Todd Lipcon , Suresh Srinivas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) As announced last week, I'm planning to do this at 2pm PDT tomorrow (Friday) April 29. Suresh, when do you plan to commit HFS-1052? That should be done first. Owen or Todd, did you want to follow Paul's advice: > If you're really wanting to make sure to keep the history in Git > intact my suggestion would be to setup a temporary svn server locally > and test our mirroring scripts against the commands you intend to run. If so, how much more time do you need? Cheers, Nige On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Owen, I'll admit I'm not familiar with all the git details/issues in your proposal, but I think the layout change you propose is fine and seems to solve the git issues with very minimal impact on the layout. > > Let's shoot for doing this next Friday, April 29 at 2pm PDT. I'll update the patch and send out a reminder about this later next week. > > Thanks, > Nige > > On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> >> On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-land. >> >> Uh, why isn't infra-dev on this thread? >> >> For those on infra-dev, the context is that Nigel is trying to merge together the source trees of the Hadoop sub-projects that were split apart 2 years ago. So he is taking: >> >> prefix = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/ >> >> $prefix/common/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/common >> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/hdfs >> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/mapreduce >> >> and play similar games with the rest of the branches and tags. For more details look at HADOOP-7106. >> >> From the project split, subversion was able to track the history across the subversion moves between projects, but not git. >> >> Four questions: >> 1. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? >> 2. Are we going to be able to preserve our sha's or are they going to change again? >> 3. What changes do we need to make to the subversion notification file? >> 4. Are there any other changes that need to be coordinated? >> >> After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce back in: >> >> $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* >> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs >> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce >> >> This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for hdfs and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git clone. >> >> -- Owen >> >> > From general-return-3291-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 06:25:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E2A215B for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82797 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 06:25:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82584 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 06:25:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82569 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 06:25:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:25:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:25:23 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4897517bwz.35 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.39.68 with SMTP id f4mr416716bke.17.1304058303184; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:25:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.70 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:24:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:24:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout To: Nigel Daley Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, "Owen O'Malley" , Suresh Srinivas , Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5555712ed806104a208bb3a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5555712ed806104a208bb3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > As announced last week, I'm planning to do this at 2pm PDT tomorrow > (Friday) April 29. > > Suresh, when do you plan to commit HFS-1052? That should be done first. > > Owen or Todd, did you want to follow Paul's advice: > > If you're really wanting to make sure to keep the history in Git > > intact my suggestion would be to setup a temporary svn server locally > > and test our mirroring scripts against the commands you intend to run. > If so, how much more time do you need? > Wasn't sure how to go about doing that. I guess we need to talk to infra about it? Do you know how we might clone the SVN repos themselves to test with? -Todd On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > Owen, I'll admit I'm not familiar with all the git details/issues in your > proposal, but I think the layout change you propose is fine and seems to > solve the git issues with very minimal impact on the layout. > > > > Let's shoot for doing this next Friday, April 29 at 2pm PDT. I'll update > the patch and send out a reminder about this later next week. > > > > Thanks, > > Nige > > > > On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > >> > >> On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon > wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in > Apache-land. > >> > >> Uh, why isn't infra-dev on this thread? > >> > >> For those on infra-dev, the context is that Nigel is trying to merge > together the source trees of the Hadoop sub-projects that were split apart 2 > years ago. So he is taking: > >> > >> prefix = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/ > >> > >> $prefix/common/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/common > >> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/hdfs > >> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/mapreduce > >> > >> and play similar games with the rest of the branches and tags. For more > details look at HADOOP-7106. > >> > >> From the project split, subversion was able to track the history across > the subversion moves between projects, but not git. > >> > >> Four questions: > >> 1. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? > >> 2. Are we going to be able to preserve our sha's or are they going to > change again? > >> 3. What changes do we need to make to the subversion notification file? > >> 4. Are there any other changes that need to be coordinated? > >> > >> After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive > move is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce back > in: > >> > >> $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* > >> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs > >> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce > >> > >> This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 > branches). We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for hdfs > and mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git clone. > >> > >> -- Owen > >> > >> > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --bcaec5555712ed806104a208bb3a-- From general-return-3292-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 12:03:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400312F2C for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2947 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 12:03:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2839 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 12:03:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2824 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 12:03:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:03:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:02:57 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so4449234wyb.35 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:02:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h7/uyrCEKhd6TLMmphLKlg5GwDAU+hhwcZV9oVLKhx0=; b=t85Nc+xevW48ef6J/ZzHQ3I4+GoRLHXi58BPrL6iWF8tonlt3/dKLwiwKGiY5eW/Dh +OR0mURMCIKIFvE14am8M7D86rsmp3jpEi7T3+Q0Me6gkcXZRICYOjmnQV4LL6x+weHv 5A+4og0Q9Twy9DfJT4sHsc6eOLkuR89hnpdMw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ccTBoTIhyPREuQNNWMdpn5ASDmCNaGVlKWo/5s6BqOYH01VB7Sr34uE8kcnTdEiowM uqCIbrYe83hyUZy0l27sNZJbzwLkYud0gf0+9c8cUaAHbKMeiW9hDLMQqeqhinYgeiJv oj1G2QUKbUgdLJxJVx7pQ+XwXKkDYkKW/IQZQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.100.219 with SMTP id z27mr782271wbn.45.1304078557698; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.42.75 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:02:37 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Applications creates bigger output than input? From: elton sky To: common-user , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd308ac30d96c04a20d73a5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd308ac30d96c04a20d73a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 One of assumptions map reduce made, I think, is that size of map's output is smaller than input. Although we can see many applications have the same size of output with input, like, sort, merge,etc. For my benchmark purpose, I am looking for some non-trivial, real life applications which creates *bigger* output than its input. Trivial example I can think about is cross join... I really appreciate if you share your knowledge with me. --000e0cd308ac30d96c04a20d73a5-- From general-return-3293-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 13:13:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 164ADA23 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10215 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 13:13:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9980 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 13:13:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9965 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 13:13:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:13:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of john.meagher@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:12:54 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4327672fxm.35 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:12:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Yi8KgAjJt9uCMrhw6rcacPHzYg1Kcs8wJJG0ROUqc7A=; b=UfUSNgJD3tPY7ag9jdj0wVz2fYGFEfXWethfCTewxb2tYTcNyajEciJvEUJzD2c526 wke2RjVpTa5ugaYgfq5nZSP5j6F+Uz8tDXN7rDhT3Ut0EmqSgX6joHDxaBVeriGP5kpx Msnil7vY0+oS0iFuLupylwqXFeqcKNWCIpLKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=jXDxMLFoWIZ4sPn1QFW1lVqW80ITJs3sIUVYWd17lvESp+rw+60X/EVaRpxrrT6jDQ bmjYdTyIJpdhUgpQWnR3D/iry1KI4e7f6EU9fON4HWY/jStxzL6kGLQeAUBaaqmYBJkb AAdT6uQjQnKN0Tu3eALJte9/E1/xR6K5nGaBg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.6.11 with SMTP id 11mr1573416fax.101.1304082754273; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.122.11 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:12:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Applications creates bigger output than input? From: John Meagher To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Another case is augmenting data. This is sometimes done outside of MR in an ETL flow, but can be done as an MR job. Doing something like this is using Hadoop to handle the scaling issues, but really isn't what MR is intended for. A real example of this is: * Input: standard apache weblog * Data added... - Geolocation of IP - Decoding URL - Adding information based on visited URL / Ref URL ... - Adding information based on the user * Output complex binary object to a sequence file On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:02, elton sky wrote: > One of assumptions map reduce made, I think, is that size of map's output is > smaller than input. Although we can see many applications have the same size > of output with input, like, sort, merge,etc. > For my benchmark purpose, I am looking for some non-trivial, real life > applications which creates *bigger* output than its input. Trivial example I > can think about is cross join... > > I really appreciate if you share your knowledge with me. > From general-return-3294-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 14:52:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30DF7205B for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56112 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 14:51:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56031 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 14:51:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56015 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 14:51:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:51:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [167.206.4.197] (HELO mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:51:46 +0000 Received: from wm2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (wm2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.10.8]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPA id <0LKF009HC59N7E10@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [38.122.12.254] by webtop.webmail.optimum.net with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:51:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:51:23 -0400 (EDT) From: MATTHEW DOERING Subject: RE: Applications creates bigger output than input? X-Originating-IP: [38.122.12.254] To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <26107912.1798433.1304088684090.JavaMail.doering@mail.srv.smfrct.cv.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-SID: 8 X-Authuserid: doering@optonline.net User-Agent: Laszlo Mail 3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If you are looking for exponential output volumes then run a market basket test. You will need only a few thousand baskets with 100 items or so. Set min support very low (5%) and confidence at 80% and you should get a flood of data. Any FIS algorythm should do the job. On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:02 AM, elton sky wrote: > One of assumptions map reduce made, I think, is that size of map's > output is > smaller than input. Although we can see many applications have the > same size > of output with input, like, sort, merge,etc. > For my benchmark purpose, I am looking for some non-trivial, real life > applications which creates *bigger* output than its input. Trivial > example I > can think about is cross join... > > I really appreciate if you share your knowledge with me. From general-return-3295-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 18:19:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7758E27AC for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23910 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 18:19:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23862 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 18:19:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23854 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 18:19:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:19:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 69.147.107.20 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sureshms@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:19:11 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p3TIHtYT040814; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304101075; bh=0cfjSL1g/171SczPzUFh51AYPTOmfgWejQdr+Pjqwys=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=mK0YqQFtu9DOVULh7J2BxAFjNihoNkg4+7zq/XpHBOJ5qSQuGHSxnn7ZOOtpW2Wz4 an4Ah60xlyvgQDGWybFv8SBDsmFF8jZBs2d2PeFEtiugeUvckT5g/ZIxf9KeEN2fCV x7+Y1lOclufzZgUxnSe/nUXQgREGE0qO1Ai+x3/s= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:54 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: Nigel Daley , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "Owen O'Malley" , Todd Lipcon CC: Ian Holsman , "infrastructure-dev@apache.org" Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:53 -0700 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Thread-Topic: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Thread-Index: AcwGK2XMVLqB9tLiRfSZFSVfV0bQcgAbluGe Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.8.0.101117 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Nigel, I have committed federation merge into trunk. Thank you for waiting for it to be done. Regards, Suresh On 4/28/11 10:06 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > As announced last week, I'm planning to do this at 2pm PDT tomorrow (Frid= ay) > April 29. =20 >=20 > Suresh, when do you plan to commit HFS-1052? That should be done first. >=20 > Owen or Todd, did you want to follow Paul's advice: >> If you're really wanting to make sure to keep the history in Git >> intact my suggestion would be to setup a temporary svn server locally >> and test our mirroring scripts against the commands you intend to run. > If so, how much more time do you need? >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> Owen, I'll admit I'm not familiar with all the git details/issues in you= r >> proposal, but I think the layout change you propose is fine and seems to >> solve the git issues with very minimal impact on the layout. >>=20 >> Let's shoot for doing this next Friday, April 29 at 2pm PDT. I'll updat= e the >> patch and send out a reminder about this later next week. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Nige >>=20 >> On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrot= e: >>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I'm currently looking into how the git mirrors are setup in Apache-la= nd. >>>=20 >>> Uh, why isn't infra-dev on this thread? >>>=20 >>> For those on infra-dev, the context is that Nigel is trying to merge >>> together the source trees of the Hadoop sub-projects that were split ap= art 2 >>> years ago. So he is taking: >>>=20 >>> prefix =3D http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/ >>>=20 >>> $prefix/common/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/common >>> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/hdfs >>> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/trunk/mapreduce >>>=20 >>> and play similar games with the rest of the branches and tags. For more >>> details look at HADOOP-7106. >>>=20 >>> From the project split, subversion was able to track the history across= the >>> subversion moves between projects, but not git. >>>=20 >>> Four questions: >>> 1. Is there anything we can do to minimize the history loss in git? >>> 2. Are we going to be able to preserve our sha's or are they going to c= hange >>> again? >>> 3. What changes do we need to make to the subversion notification file? >>> 4. Are there any other changes that need to be coordinated? >>>=20 >>> After considering it this morning, I believe that the least disruptive = move >>> is to leave common at the same url and merge hdfs and mapreduce back in= : >>>=20 >>> $prefix/common/trunk/* -> $prefix/common/trunk/common/* >>> $prefix/hdfs/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/hdfs >>> $prefix/mapreduce/trunk -> $prefix/common/trunk/mapreduce >>>=20 >>> This will preserve the hashes and history for common (and the 20 branch= es). >>> We'll still need to play git voodoo to get git history for hdfs and >>> mapreduce, but it is far better than starting a brand new git clone. >>>=20 >>> -- Owen >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3296-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 18:37:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2E72519 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41279 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41230 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41221 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:37:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:37:24 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.123.81]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p3TIaPKd076807; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1304102185; bh=t/Kfd5j7vEoOl8GINQ4jeHepURS0EnO9Wjv8SBG8D8g=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=IpruIabfQ/FQrLihnfEmlzdXLM74bQipaah4UNRVuCXELr4x7CuIF6jAdhxcy+xnb p1hqxd8SKky5il6R+ro2WNPM1cinDSQfc6PdTKh59/8pM+zYZu1FdwpDF7uU29IFf/ H4S5tgXVbJ7Hf9MN5kzcfClAZHLyYC/LZumuzzxE= Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--622529222 From: "Owen O'Malley" In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:36:25 -0700 Cc: Nigel Daley , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , Suresh Srinivas , Ian Holsman , "infrastructure-dev@apache.org" Message-Id: References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> To: Todd Lipcon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-1--622529222 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Wasn't sure how to go about doing that. I guess we need to talk to = infra about it? Do you know how we might clone the SVN repos themselves = to test with? It looks like there are svn dumps at http://svn-master.apache.org/dump/ = from 2 april 2011. You should be able to use those to setup a local = subversion. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-1--622529222-- From general-return-3297-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 29 20:18:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C002B2EFE for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49751 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 20:18:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49697 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 20:18:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49689 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 20:18:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:18:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:18:06 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from lt-a3-110073.jiveland.com ([67.136.90.250]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LKF00M1DKC1SX30@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:16:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-29_07:2011-04-29,2011-04-29,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104290139 Subject: Re: HADOOP-7106: Re-organize hadoop subversion layout From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:16:49 -0700 Cc: Ian Holsman , infrastructure-dev@apache.org Message-id: <4EB044AB-A4F8-4530-AB68-0A675D96BCF8@mac.com> References: <4112B27D-7DCF-4C8E-AD61-6884BA7E738C@mac.com> <844F39DC-0A5D-4AAE-AF8D-EFD4CC83C18A@mac.com> <9B529359-B589-4229-BA96-188C762A8E31@apache.org> <522E7C8B-C159-4520-A758-6E994195D0DC@mac.com> <83FF361E-EA96-4E82-9084-19D91BCEB608@mac.com> To: Todd Lipcon , general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I can't do this at 2pm now. Todd, I suspect you want more time to try out the svn/git test anyways. Let's shoot for next Wednesday at 2pm. Ian should be back by then too. Any objections? Cheers, Nige On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Wasn't sure how to go about doing that. I guess we need to talk to infra about it? Do you know how we might clone the SVN repos themselves to test with? > > It looks like there are svn dumps at http://svn-master.apache.org/dump/ from 2 april 2011. You should be able to use those to setup a local subversion. > > -- Owen > From general-return-3298-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 30 07:19:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45E6737EA for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88433 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 07:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87930 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 07:19:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87913 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2011 07:19:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:19:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eltonsky9404@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:18:55 +0000 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so5238346wyb.35 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gtaDLoCD5IGUFLtKLhXAM/H1FJH2zLHQaLMtKr/iQuI=; b=X74LpE9EYjK4TjQtS/IrOVPvIQB/MtrRYjVtq1gcL96gZN2xc2ojQvZDwPe7kvXX28 yZNjCEawlST5EtDnRi5N93GDu7xsJ9T8Rfwh8Q42bqGcYEhpwDuBoMWpQuTtDWF7jutB GnsYWCe1ajVVO6JDoMXpBe64ueIBThOWZgF9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZWd2vr5ezHFlHe7NLq9gUZNwBqpP3yUNMQ2bwYYKZDZHz7yox67JYqtTL18g54Zt/Q 6OkZ94rxJ0TgeD84rCshqpXpIw8G22iRiIXoIpZdxAzT9Seg5lRuF3qx/Xuhuy5GYJjm 09BZUdZbPJ9sbUgLeAivbjWNH5tsFvBIImSZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.100.219 with SMTP id z27mr1764308wbn.45.1304147914066; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.42.75 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:18:34 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: questions about hadoop map reduce and compute intensive related applications From: elton sky To: common-user , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd308ac270b9104a21d9917 --000e0cd308ac270b9104a21d9917 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I got 2 questions: 1. I am wondering how hadoop MR performs when it runs compute intensive applications, e.g. Monte carlo method compute PI. There's a example in 0.21, QuasiMonteCarlo, but that example doesn't use random number and it generates psudo input upfront. If we use distributed random number generation, then I guess the performance of hadoop should be similar with some message passing framework, like MPI. So my guess is by using proper method hadoop would be good in compute intensive applications compared with MPI. 2. I am looking for some applications, which has large data sets and requires intensive computation. An application can be divided into a workflow, including either map reduce operations, and message passing like operations. For example, in step 1 I use hadoop MR processes 10TB of data and generates small output, say, 10GB. This 10GB can be fit into memory and they are better be processed with some interprocess communication, which will boost the performance. So in step 2 I will use MPI, etc. Is there any application has this property, perhaps in some scientific research area? Or it's just alright to use map reduce itself? Regards, Elton --000e0cd308ac270b9104a21d9917-- From general-return-3299-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 30 20:31:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5C5312E for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9903 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 20:31:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9377 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2011 20:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8907 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2011 20:31:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:31:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:31:33 +0000 Received: by vxa37 with SMTP id 37so5546249vxa.35 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.243 with SMTP id bv19mr2303953vdc.93.1304195472146; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.160.194 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:30:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.160.196.149] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:30:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: questions about hadoop map reduce and compute intensive related applications To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a8e0cd5c0a504a228ab30 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51a8e0cd5c0a504a228ab30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:18 AM, elton sky wrote: > I got 2 questions: > > 1. I am wondering how hadoop MR performs when it runs compute intensive > applications, e.g. Monte carlo method compute PI. There's a example in > 0.21, > QuasiMonteCarlo, but that example doesn't use random number and it > generates > psudo input upfront. If we use distributed random number generation, then I > guess the performance of hadoop should be similar with some message passing > framework, like MPI. So my guess is by using proper method hadoop would be > good in compute intensive applications compared with MPI. > Not quite sure what algorithms you mean here, but for trivial parallelism, map-reduce is a fine way to go. MPI supports node-to-node communications in ways that map-reduce does not, however, which requires that you iterate map-reduce steps for many algorithms. With Hadoop's current implementation, this is horrendously slow (minimum 20-30 seconds per iteration). Sometimes you can avoid this by clever tricks. For instance, random projection can compute the key step in an SVD decomposition with one map-reduce while the comparable Lanczos algorithm requires more than one step per eigenvector (and we often want 100 of them!). Sometimes, however, there are no known algorithms that avoid the need for repeated communication. For these problems, Hadoop as it stands may be a poor fit. Help is on the way, however, with the MapReduce 2.0 work because that will allow much more flexible models of computation. > 2. I am looking for some applications, which has large data sets and > requires intensive computation. An application can be divided into a > workflow, including either map reduce operations, and message passing like > operations. For example, in step 1 I use hadoop MR processes 10TB of data > and generates small output, say, 10GB. This 10GB can be fit into memory and > they are better be processed with some interprocess communication, which > will boost the performance. So in step 2 I will use MPI, etc. > Some machine learning algorithms require features that are much smaller than the original input. This leads to exactly the pattern you describe. Integrating MPI with map-reduce is currently difficult and/or very ugly, however. Not impossible and there are hackish ways to do the job, but they are hacks. --bcaec51a8e0cd5c0a504a228ab30-- From general-return-2311-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 01 17:54:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86950 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2010 17:54:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2010 17:54:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9481 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2010 17:54:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9419 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2010 17:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9411 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2010 17:54:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:54:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:54:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 86916 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2010 17:53:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:53:45 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so172556wwb.5 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.66 with SMTP id r2mr15655379wbw.116.1288634054818; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.152.139 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:54:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Patrick Hunt To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hadoop@holsman.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The vote passes, with 23 +1 votes and no -1 votes. Ian, can you please add this resolution to the agenda for the week board meeting? Thanks, Patrick On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Hemanth Yamijala wro= te: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a >> top-level Apache project. >> >> The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved >> ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It >> lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who >> has not been active on the project since it's inception >> http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management >> committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. >> >> >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the >> Hadoop PMC? >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >> >> ------------ >> >> =A0 =A0X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> =A0 =A0 =A0 interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 open-source software related to distributed system coordinat= ion >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for distribution at no charge to the public. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Projec= t", >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Foundation; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> =A0 =A0 =A0 related to distributed system coordination; and be it furthe= r >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er" be >> =A0 =A0 =A0 and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chai= r >> =A0 =A0 =A0 of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary respons= ibility >> =A0 =A0 =A0 for management of the projects within the scope of >> =A0 =A0 =A0 responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it fu= rther >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> =A0 =A0 =A0 hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Patrick Hunt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Flavio Junqueira =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Mahadev Konar =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Benjamin Reed =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Henry Robinson =A0 =A0 =A0 >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt >> =A0 =A0 =A0 be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeep= er, to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> =A0 =A0 =A0 death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereb= y is >> =A0 =A0 =A0 tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> =A0 =A0 =A0 encourage open development and increased participation in th= e >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby >> =A0 =A0 =A0 is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apac= he >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. >> > From general-return-2312-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 02 00:40:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74953 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 00:40:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 00:40:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3551 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 00:40:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3488 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 00:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3480 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 00:40:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:40:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:40:44 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so6515416wyg.35 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:40:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.53.4 with SMTP id f4mr377170wec.4.1288658422559; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.78 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 17:40:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:40:22 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP? From: Ian Holsman Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6da86628374ff0494072bd5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6da86628374ff0494072bd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 sure.. I'll be glad too. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The vote passes, with 23 +1 votes and no -1 votes. > > Ian, can you please add this resolution to the agenda for the week > board meeting? > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Hemanth Yamijala > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a > >> top-level Apache project. > >> > >> The ZooKeeper development community has already voted on and approved > >> ( http://bit.ly/9VCoTi ) the following draft board resolution. It > >> lists all current active ZooKeeper committers (sans one committer who > >> has not been active on the project since it's inception > >> http://bit.ly/9wLkVV) as initial members of the project management > >> committee (PMC) and myself, Patrick Hunt, as the initial chair. > >> > >> > >> Do the good people of Hadoop support sending this request on to the > >> Hadoop PMC? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> ------------ > >> > >> X. Establish the Apache ZooKeeper Project > >> > >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best > >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the > >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management > >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of > >> open-source software related to distributed system coordination > >> for distribution at no charge to the public. > >> > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ZooKeeper Project", > >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > >> Foundation; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby is > >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software > >> related to distributed system coordination; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper" be > >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to > >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > >> of the Apache ZooKeeper Project, and to have primary > responsibility > >> for management of the projects within the scope of > >> responsibility of the Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > >> Apache ZooKeeper Project: > >> > >> * Patrick Hunt > >> * Flavio Junqueira > >> * Mahadev Konar > >> * Benjamin Reed > >> * Henry Robinson > >> > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Patrick Hunt > >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache ZooKeeper, to > >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the > >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until > >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, > >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ZooKeeper PMC be and hereby is > >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > >> encourage open development and increased participation in the > >> Apache ZooKeeper Project; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that the Apache ZooKeeper Project be and hereby > >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache > >> Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project; and be it further > >> > >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache > >> Hadoop ZooKeeper sub-project encumbered upon the > >> Apache Hadoop Project are hereafter discharged. > >> > > > --0016e6da86628374ff0494072bd5-- From general-return-2313-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 02 18:25:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76207 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 18:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 18:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 65890 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 18:26:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65828 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 18:26:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65820 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 18:26:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:26:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.186.241.227] (HELO sri01.semanticresearch.local) (64.186.241.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:26:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) by sri01.semanticresearch.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DE93060002 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sri01.semanticresearch.local Received: from sri01.semanticresearch.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMGnd6WrcC8H for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sri01.semanticresearch.local (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) by sri01.semanticresearch.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0503060001 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark Laffoon" To: Subject: web-based file transfer Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_033F_01CB7A80.B5DCA550" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.13_GA_2791.RHEL5 (ZimbraConnectorForOutlook/5.0.2893.13) Thread-Index: Act6u2HNx5BSRl6vQtil6xKpsp646g== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [172.27.16.186] ------=_NextPart_000_033F_01CB7A80.B5DCA550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). Thanks, Mark ------=_NextPart_000_033F_01CB7A80.B5DCA550-- From general-return-2314-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 02 18:43:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89392 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 18:43:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 18:43:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 13838 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 18:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13681 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 18:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13664 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 18:44:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:44:22 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so7397793wyg.35 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr10660038wem.14.1288723441164; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.201 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:44:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: web-based file transfer From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like this for a few reasons. 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public network; you don't want to do this. 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS which isn't its strong point. >From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple boxes and distribute the work. Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with the fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats their contents as individual events, etc. http://github.com/cloudera/flume. Hope that helps. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon wrote: > We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, > whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious > simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I > was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where > the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration > information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. > > > > Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting > point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2315-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 05:23:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77952 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 05:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 05:23:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30597 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 05:23:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30164 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 05:23:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30155 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 05:23:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:23:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:23:37 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so288820iwn.35 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.22.140 with SMTP id o12mr5152041icb.466.1288761795297; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [110.22.134.89] ([110.22.134.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fw4sm355270ibb.13.2010.11.02.22.23.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:23:14 -0700 (PDT) References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: web-based file transfer Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:22:02 +1100 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Doesn't chukwa do something like this? --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangelo On 03/11/2010, at 5:44 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like > this for a few reasons. > > 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public > network; you don't want to do this. > 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS which > isn't its strong point. > > From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing > system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can > throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate > the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single > writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple > competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to > operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while > being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is > to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple > boxes and distribute the work. > > Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with the > fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats > their contents as individual events, etc. > http://github.com/cloudera/flume. > > Hope that helps. > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon > wrote: >> We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, >> whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious >> simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I >> was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where >> the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration >> information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. >> >> >> >> Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting >> point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mark >> >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2316-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 05:43:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81825 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 05:43:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 05:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 45001 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 05:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44721 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 05:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44711 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 05:43:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:43:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:43:50 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so121585pwj.35 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wSUTujQblbKCGJaIQavHB8eusF9QkX9rQqcXzokgi80=; b=c0YlbedyJzPUEE4Ra7dRkvFq7KQd6SOudgdC1zR6SRiMKTt/jP+SRgeviZZ1vGzQHO K7wxTHus6jlb1jjGfC2ADBDQQ2aKvQpChtv4IyuZ+lvBWrvLjwMoiyAV9mRowJiguvwP CSwOuO3YgsrRQFS0gqH9ku+5ChL36zbGjg0dE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gNoRXfZs8QJH5bclyN6uWla0qCBrY4qy7ERBuVnrq2vkeyEia2TEA5MD8xjlxqnucw yTYZskJeUSxPQeym1KW/JIBlIyTlwa5z60cWktSzQHfpAyYdEFTMKOopvY0w3WghvMQY u+QeO9n2mA7OgX+kTOKGRfwrF3PdI2IlB30YM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.161.12 with SMTP id j12mr64435wfe.201.1288763010071; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 22:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.114.20 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:43:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:43:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd14fae6a3e5a04941f850d --000e0cd14fae6a3e5a04941f850d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It looks very hard to follow. I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. Especially when they interleave. Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? --Konstantin On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > +1 > > On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance >> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the >> >> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review >> Hadoop JIRAS. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 >> >> thanks, >> dhruba >> > > --000e0cd14fae6a3e5a04941f850d-- From general-return-2317-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 11:35:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98452 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 11:35:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 11:35:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 55792 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 11:36:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55418 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 11:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55410 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 11:36:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_OBFU_WWW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:36:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB29C1BA5FA for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:35:43 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SQAnj0m2Cp1V for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1641D1BA59D for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:35:42 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1289388922.05139@hixvR3Ol+0/CudDeblngsA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oA3BZLw9010972 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:35:21 GMT Message-ID: <4CD148F9.8080600@apache.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:35:21 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: web-based file transfer References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> In-Reply-To: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oA3BZLw9010972 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 02/11/10 18:25, Mark Laffoon wrote: > We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, > whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious > simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I > was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where > the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration > information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. I recall some work done with webdav https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-225 -but I don't think it's progressed I've done things like this in the past with servlets and forms; the webapp you deploy has the hadoop configuration (and the network rights to talk to HDFS in the datacentre), the clients PUT/POST up content http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/long-haul-hadoop However, you are limited to 2GB worth of upload/download in most web clients, some (chrome) go up to 4GB but you are pushing the limit there. Even all the Java servlet APIs assume that the content-length header fits into a signed 32 bit integer and gets unhappy once you go over 2GB (something I worry about in http://jira.smartfrog.org/jira/browse/SFOS-1476 ) Because Hadoop really likes large files -tens to hundreds of GB in a big cluster- I don't think the current web infrastructure is up to working with it. that said, looking at hudson for the nightly runs of my bulk IO tests , jetty will serve up 4GB in 5 minutes (loopback if), and I can POST or PUT up 4GB, but I have to get/set content length headers myself rather than rely on the java.net client and servlet implementations to handle it: http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/components/www/src/org/smartfrog/services/www/bulkio/client/SunJavaBulkIOClient.java?revision=8430&view=markup If you can control the client, then maybe you would be able to do >4GB uploads, but otherwise you are stuck with data <2GB in size, which is, -what- 4-8 blocks in a production cluster? -steve From general-return-2318-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 16:05:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26258 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 16:05:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 16:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 31704 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:05:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31420 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:05:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31412 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 16:05:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:05:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:05:43 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so354406eyz.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.206 with SMTP id r56mr793182wed.29.1288800320135; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.201 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:05:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: web-based file transfer From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Something like it, but Chukwa is more similar to Flume. For *files* one may want something slightly different. For a stream of (data) events, Chukwa, Flume, or Scribe are appropriate. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Doesn't chukwa do something like this? > > --- > Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 > > I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangelo > > On 03/11/2010, at 5:44 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like >> this for a few reasons. >> >> 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public >> network; you don't want to do this. >> 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS which >> isn't its strong point. >> >> From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing >> system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can >> throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate >> the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single >> writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple >> competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to >> operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while >> being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is >> to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple >> boxes and distribute the work. >> >> Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with the >> fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats >> their contents as individual events, etc. >> http://github.com/cloudera/flume. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon >> wrote: >>> We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, >>> whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious >>> simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I >>> was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where >>> the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration >>> information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting >>> point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2319-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 16:13:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38565 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 16:13:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 16:13:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 44854 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:14:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44676 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44664 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 16:13:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:13:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:13:53 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:13:29 +0100 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:13:08 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: Evert Lammerts Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:13:08 +0100 Subject: Hadoop workshop at SARA, December 7 Thread-Topic: Hadoop workshop at SARA, December 7 Thread-Index: Act7cgFN0DF7es6wRtSfJfyOQQ/Gtg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0139_01CB7B7A.631D6B10" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_0139_01CB7B7A.631D6B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What: SARA Apache Hadoop computing workshop When: Tuesday, December 7th Where: SARA, Science Park 121 Amsterdam, room TBA Dear readers, You are all invited to participate in the first Apache Hadoop "hackathon" in The Netherlands on Tuesday, December 7th. This event is also the kick-off of the SARA Proof-of-Concept Hadoop service. More information on the event and the technology can be found below. If you are interested in participating, please register as soon as possible, and not later than December 1st by sending an email to evert.lammerts@sara.nl. Best regards, Evert Lammerts =================================================== SARA Apache Hadoop "Hackathon" Back in 2004, driven by the need to process extreme amounts of data, Google developed a system that exists of the Google File System and MapReduce. Based on two papers that Google published on the topic[1,2], Doug Cutting[3] created what is now the Apache Hadoop software stack. Apache Hadoop is used in several capacities by a number of internet giants (e.g. Yahoo!, IBM, eBay, Facebook, Last.fm, LinkedIn, Twitter and many more[4]). It's ability to store and process extremely large datasets makes it particularly beneficial for sciences as Natural Language Processing, BioInformatics, Social Sciences and Humanities. SARA provides a Proof-of-Concept Apache Hadoop storage and computing service for scientific use[5]. The "hackathon" will be a hands-on introduction to Hadoop. You are invited to come spend a day at SARA to play with the system, with the support of two experienced users, Edgar Meij (UvA) and Djoerd Hiemstra (UT). You can work on your own or in groups and analyze your own dataset or play with for example the Wikipedia, ENRON or White House access records datasets. Programming skills will be assumed, and you need to take your own laptops. Coffee and soft drinks will be provided throughout the day, and lunch will be served at 12.00 AM. Program: 09:30 - 09:35 Introduction to the day 09:35 - 10:15 Examples of data analysis with Hadoop 10:30 - 17:00 Hackathon 17:00 - end Presentation of results [1] http://labs.google.com/papers/gfs.html [2] http://labs.google.com/papers/mapreduce.html [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Cutting [4] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PoweredBy [5] http://www.sara.nl/news/recent/20101103/Hadoop_proof-of-concept.html Evert Lammerts Consultant eScience Support SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization Phone: +31 20 888 4101 Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl http://www.sara.nl ------=_NextPart_000_0139_01CB7B7A.631D6B10 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMTEwMzE2MTMwOFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFKyK7Ikj RKZ1uh9vzwl/DzPa32hxMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAPjom3mRPlZJT4yngjjuquKsdV89HNOBF6Ee/w+sv3917I15eAAW8u0qw7OqJz9A+h9vNvYwk IcnOtvViTHInL1Yip/Oa4taYiEO/zA1iPdpA3q6hrE54mfVglzH0OO7PRJvq68qZCtWhDiPS+ZeI ayBKX+jqOweiX9I5zb0aKBS3zYk5ERW5gqEF0PBQvEd7Tha6zRwSverHPSfd7qDSKJMqMW2rSZff 83b/WvSX5t+UpdrqlmWR21whYTmVt2XWPQs1XboOD4jQqtiIq2r63gzPD0JDbKbMBKb88hbJswOh IYQbSqQI3VAOp5G93n/XlXCynbomSvY938ebK1EaggAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0139_01CB7B7A.631D6B10-- From general-return-2320-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 16:32:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49333 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 16:32:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 16:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 84174 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83645 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:32:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83299 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 16:32:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:32:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.81] (HELO nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:32:25 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm11.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 16:32:03 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.60] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 16:32:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 16:32:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 428270.13035.bm@omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 71679 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Nov 2010 16:32:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1288801922; bh=2QHeBIOLiOpUfa0IELYExLPQkHy4ewd2GePqHPEKAqo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lGY6HNKI13Ze5bXg3eN4uSUmGrseV29VyVO+4gSw4RWcWeuKCchjtuntviw12jKZBhbqs3oCQw34lSx1mPLo4QgtqAgf0O8S0+T8sTfk13TUGbYgpRjtS2epKv2HGesZV9Gph3d9kuuaHx2B0ghvKDsw+eiPovz71MFUO/EEa1M= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CFBzdNoir46FWApBXYiE1GdQo1PhHteQUTrfqp06/cQhgkkv4dfgVRhhklFypQqMztdXExuDtxXNMO12Hs3gwQlqiRPYXf1xXTcnHRitgFh/Gujzm5bS/KnJfkVe5xnGBzamLPQXf3tbOnsGHlHUJA7ycqpP2iVX3z0ZpyC9u5s=; Message-ID: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: h.m.I8UVM1kCuRnQnHD.f_FalhZXUTzgc6_HjcYoh3enww8 pHqfatBdfhc0JS22s.xth9VZ_rFy36i5lHWU3AnOxSEOnKZWcRiTLVbFO0X2 HWKzu8xkh24Rd0xBgaKPcwNKt2ZRaYmPDMY9fbHKzjdMDMaLnpgWSvpUnnmx 73mailjG4akxnEMnLrD0cefDiFvzp8jRiIBNe67UQnuJoC7mJqz93PZpiCxq LL6jxvSuU1_.8E24lk2zjwFCWdl.sE.VHvXOU20zKGmFTK_Z5vx11.wFKmsh w9IUphH84EBKbFWwFyeIA_W6c0V.utx0eo26QJoleS4mv_NM.60z.vA-- Received: from [82.130.74.71] by web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:32:02 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-68915803-1288801922=:64007" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-68915803-1288801922=:64007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I am trying to set up Hadoop=A0 on PlanetLab nodes. However, as far as I seen I need password less SSH login between master and= slave nodes in Hadoop.=20 My=0Amain problem is for planet lab nodes I have a privatekey I always use= =0Awhen connect to planet lab nodes. I am using=A0 ssh -i ~/.ssh/privatekey= =0Auser@planet_lab_node Also, the username on planet lab nodes is different from the user name I ha= ve on my local cluster.=20 Is there any possibility to use hadoop on planet lab nodes ? Any hints, suggestions or links will be valuable for me. Thanks, Robert=0A=0A=0A --0-68915803-1288801922=:64007-- From general-return-2321-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 16:54:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63689 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 16:54:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 16:54:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 37960 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:54:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37752 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 16:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37738 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 16:54:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:54:26 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so699448fxm.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=S3f9OHIgmaqVVi4/ke6ihvNA1/6b6R+hMcotLrViFj0=; b=atXGNDDZSzxst5tb16XxSNVHykV+7oJeQud2mi70HLg0SwGyunedg9vq9ZZ4QNaOvy OuVKtllj6F/a3zoqUDQ9OkfF2nIOzZnbZHhig/dfLArQfwAvS4b4WzEEqLS52o4tiK0W uvsAwIZxbhn4On73jVTCcdJMiiL6kW0STxg3g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fACEIGFHXMcRPaDETC49YCPWTqgLDYZRKcXAHV83miLwNqjulf/H10AIAcrgwIYnyQ ZXxPMmAOR9lXUyviAi2yjsTWo2zmvg1331cxi+7hKOWZ+Tq/C7oFcw99+QYxrw9FC5y9 0EuxO4I0V3KuL45lpS8j4Qr6TEiwIXei5Ti94= Received: by 10.223.100.9 with SMTP id w9mr5278856fan.12.1288803245076; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:54:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.80 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:53:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 22:23:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to set up Hadoop=A0 on PlanetLab nodes. > > However, as far as I seen I need password less SSH login between master a= nd slave nodes in Hadoop. This is "needed" for ease of setup, but you can as well start all nodes manually yourselves without requiring SSH as a dependency. Just for your information (won't be the right way out, perhaps). For instance, you can ssh manually and issue "hadoop tasktracker" and "hadoop datanode" commands in the nodes to start those daemons. > My > main problem is for planet lab nodes I have a privatekey I always use > when connect to planet lab nodes. I am using=A0 ssh -i ~/.ssh/privatekey > user@planet_lab_node > > Also, the username on planet lab nodes is different from the user name I = have on my local cluster. > > Is there any possibility to use hadoop on planet lab nodes ? > > Any hints, suggestions or links will be valuable for me. > > Thanks, > Robert > > > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2322-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 17:03:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68556 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 17:03:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 17:03:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 56786 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:03:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56508 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56495 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 17:03:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:03:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:03:49 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so854247wyg.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:03:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.20 with SMTP id a20mr11863327wem.14.1288803807505; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.161.201 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:03:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:03:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Better than passwordless ssh is to use ssh-agent and load your key (providing the passphrase once). See 'man ssh-agent' for details, although it's pretty straight forward. Short version: # See if ssh-agent is already running for your user by trying to list # keys it knows about. That's a "dash-ell." ssh-add -l # Load an ssh key. ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_rsa If your public key is already on all the nodes, watch as magically start-all/stop-all work without requiring a password. WARNING: When working with authentication, remote login, and anything security related, *never* blindly take advice. Always take the time to understand the ramifications. See man pages for ssh, ssh-agent, ssh-add, and ssh_config. Hope that helps. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to set up Hadoop=A0 on PlanetLab nodes. >> >> However, as far as I seen I need password less SSH login between master = and slave nodes in Hadoop. > > This is "needed" for ease of setup, but you can as well start all > nodes manually yourselves without requiring SSH as a dependency. Just > for your information (won't be the right way out, perhaps). > > For instance, you can ssh manually and issue "hadoop tasktracker" and > "hadoop datanode" commands in the nodes to start those daemons. > >> My >> main problem is for planet lab nodes I have a privatekey I always use >> when connect to planet lab nodes. I am using=A0 ssh -i ~/.ssh/privatekey >> user@planet_lab_node >> >> Also, the username on planet lab nodes is different from the user name I= have on my local cluster. >> >> Is there any possibility to use hadoop on planet lab nodes ? >> >> Any hints, suggestions or links will be valuable for me. >> >> Thanks, >> Robert >> >> >> > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2323-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 17:16:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84090 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 17:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 17:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 76935 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76709 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76701 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 17:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:16:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEE3B7E0D for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:16:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PdSUQ3npOVaL for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F9BB7E08 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:16:13 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1289409341.49953@lu5lrlSFtNqY/RZEb+E3rg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oA3HFeCB000533 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:15:40 GMT Message-ID: <4CD198BC.1060304@apache.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:15:40 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes References: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oA3HFeCB000533 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/11/10 16:32, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to set up Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes. > > However, as far as I seen I need password less SSH login between master and slave nodes in Hadoop. > My > main problem is for planet lab nodes I have a privatekey I always use > when connect to planet lab nodes. I am using ssh -i ~/.ssh/privatekey > user@planet_lab_node > > Also, the username on planet lab nodes is different from the user name I have on my local cluster. > > Is there any possibility to use hadoop on planet lab nodes ? > I wouldn't rush to do it as their nodes are distributed with odd networking -you get a wide cluster, not a fast one. Better to try for cluster time on OpenCirrus, which does run Hadoop. From general-return-2324-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 17:56:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 507 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 17:56:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 17:56:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 47983 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47865 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 17:56:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47857 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 17:56:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:56:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:56:39 +0000 Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so219679qyk.14 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:56:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.238.16 with SMTP id kq16mr2303574qcb.134.1288806978599; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:56:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:56:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Cos, I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the jira which makes it easier to follow. RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. Thanks, Eli On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > It looks very hard to follow. > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > Especially when they interleave. > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > --Konstantin > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >> >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. >>> >>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the >>> >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review >>> Hadoop JIRAS. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 >>> >>> thanks, >>> dhruba >>> >> >> > From general-return-2325-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 18:28:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31650 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 18:28:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 18:28:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 91970 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 18:29:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91795 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 18:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91787 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 18:29:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:29:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:29:14 +0000 Received: by ywp4 with SMTP id 4so796307ywp.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.114.82 with SMTP id d18mr809175faq.66.1288808932215; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm3852680fax.42.2010.11.03.11.28.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:28:47 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? Message-ID: <20101103182846.GD7137@tp> References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7DO5AaGCk89r4vaK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --7DO5AaGCk89r4vaK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Eli. the explanation is right on the money except that other Konstantin was aski= ng ;) Cos On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:56AM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Cos, >=20 > I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the > jira which makes it easier to follow. >=20 > RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review > system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have > issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > It looks very hard to follow. > > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > > Especially when they interleave. > > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > > --Konstantin > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy wrot= e: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > >> > >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > >>> > >>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_= the > >>> > >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review > >>> Hadoop JIRAS. > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> dhruba > >>> > >> > >> > > --7DO5AaGCk89r4vaK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAkzRqd4ACgkQenyFlstYjhIEigEAu8B02SVMMrxEPfSBS+GO6Eep yovFJ9NabIiN8fIL+N0A/0+oVIYEvrZj/tJ8ACjhZwp515cOwIGAueq1zgkqtGny =meaK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7DO5AaGCk89r4vaK-- From general-return-2326-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 03 23:19:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63829 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 23:19:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 23:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 51798 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 23:20:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51736 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 23:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51728 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 23:20:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:20:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.71] (HELO mailout02.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:19:53 +0000 Received: from mailint02 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C8F214480 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:19:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs02.internal.vodafone.com (unknown [145.230.4.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint02 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791AE2144AB for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:19:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs02.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:19:33 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:19:32 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A152@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: web-based file transfer Thread-Index: Act7cP6h/AoLuUpGTa+NPpITyj0u4wAOt7oD References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2010 23:19:33.0790 (UTC) FILETIME=[931CFBE0:01CB7BAD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Check out HDFS over WebDAV - http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/Home/hdfs-over-webdav WebDAV is an HTTP based protocol for accessing remote filesystems. I'm running an adapted version of this. It runs under Jetty which is = pretty industry standard and is built on Apache JackRabbit which is = pretty production stable too. I lashed together a custom JAAS = authentication module to authenticate it against our user database. You can mount WebDAV on Linux using FUSE and WDFS, or script sessions = with cadaver on Solaris/Unix without mounting WebDav. It works pretty = sweet on Windows and Apple, too.=20 Recent versions of Jetty have built in traffic shaping and QoS features, = although you might get more mileage from HAProxy or a hardware = loadbalancer. It works pretty sweet as it enforces HDFS permissions (if you have them = enabled). To get Hadoop permission integrity enforced on MapReduce jobs = check out Oozie - it's a job submission proxy which runs under Tomcat = (might work with Jetty too - haven't tried) and can use a custom = ServletFilter for authentication which you can also patch onto your own = user database/directory.=20 Then you just need to seal the perimeter of your cluster with Firewall = rules and you're good to go No more Kerberos! R -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com] Sent: Wed 11/3/2010 5:05 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: web-based file transfer =20 Something like it, but Chukwa is more similar to Flume. For *files* one may want something slightly different. For a stream of (data) events, Chukwa, Flume, or Scribe are appropriate. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Doesn't chukwa do something like this? > > --- > Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 > > I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- = Michelangelo > > On 03/11/2010, at 5:44 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like >> this for a few reasons. >> >> 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public >> network; you don't want to do this. >> 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS = which >> isn't its strong point. >> >> From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing >> system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can >> throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate >> the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single >> writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple >> competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to >> operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while >> being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is >> to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple >> boxes and distribute the work. >> >> Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with = the >> fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats >> their contents as individual events, etc. >> http://github.com/cloudera/flume. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon >> wrote: >>> We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java = applet, >>> whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The = obvious >>> simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to = hdfs. I >>> was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet = where >>> the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration >>> information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into = hdfs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a = starting >>> point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get = ideas). >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2327-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 03:43:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88754 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 03:43:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 03:43:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 60162 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 03:44:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59752 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 03:44:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59744 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 03:44:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:44:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:43:58 +0000 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1457711wyg.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:43:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.132.137 with SMTP id b9mr149215wbt.48.1288842215921; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.239.200 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:43:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <975551.64007.qm@web112101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:43:35 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646bc4873976e049431f689 --00163646bc4873976e049431f689 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 to answer the 2nd part of your question.. how do I log on with a different userID. you can create a file called .ssh/config and in that you can specify the userID to use as a default, as well as other parameters for example: I have the following set up for all hosts on example.com 33 Host *.example.com 34 Port 22 35 Protocol 2 36 Compression no 38 User xyz man ssh_config has more details. Regards Ian On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > Better than passwordless ssh is to use ssh-agent and load your key > (providing the passphrase once). See 'man ssh-agent' for details, > although it's pretty straight forward. > > Short version: > > # See if ssh-agent is already running for your user by trying to list > # keys it knows about. That's a "dash-ell." > ssh-add -l > > # Load an ssh key. > ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_rsa > > > If your public key is already on all the nodes, watch as magically > start-all/stop-all work without requiring a password. > > WARNING: When working with authentication, remote login, and anything > security related, *never* blindly take advice. Always take the time to > understand the ramifications. See man pages for ssh, ssh-agent, > ssh-add, and ssh_config. > > Hope that helps. > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Harsh J wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am trying to set up Hadoop on PlanetLab nodes. > >> > >> However, as far as I seen I need password less SSH login between master > and slave nodes in Hadoop. > > > > This is "needed" for ease of setup, but you can as well start all > > nodes manually yourselves without requiring SSH as a dependency. Just > > for your information (won't be the right way out, perhaps). > > > > For instance, you can ssh manually and issue "hadoop tasktracker" and > > "hadoop datanode" commands in the nodes to start those daemons. > > > >> My > >> main problem is for planet lab nodes I have a privatekey I always use > >> when connect to planet lab nodes. I am using ssh -i ~/.ssh/privatekey > >> user@planet_lab_node > >> > >> Also, the username on planet lab nodes is different from the user name I > have on my local cluster. > >> > >> Is there any possibility to use hadoop on planet lab nodes ? > >> > >> Any hints, suggestions or links will be valuable for me. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Robert > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Harsh J > > www.harshj.com > > > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > --00163646bc4873976e049431f689-- From general-return-2328-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 06:15:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44804 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 06:15:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 06:15:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 60366 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60273 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60265 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 06:15:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:15:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:15:44 +0000 Received: by pvg16 with SMTP id 16so568872pvg.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:15:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wOdyzM8AJENA36kfE4TRjEztMcioWUBsL5JpLIbR2+8=; b=iJ2hfA6oRmNlMycZZOdfgrHnYcN8HgvKo1IwgIB7jXhMxhnMgLAB7h9qUGtTl57i9J jMVf7iI92JAr+hxWy1QXiR1Bz9vWg/r3se1rKFR1sNSszbqZyIK2y9sd6CdRsiLf/4zK 9kqOidta5gofjQBvIKNaNlUsQMbC39yXdBm6Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RRNZGxUEg2MzjdjloDhN30v2S2gZCKF/CN8/Aekph+TCiKCInaEGVpdqnTnqJP0m/9 AQ8V5kHFJIxL0PBOEWaXwIlprE7ajm9aEf4TKMp/yBrRBUmvL/YsFhKXX/4TU2Mf5NqO e30NlE6g8Vy8KlxjcId3DmPYvPIv/li8Qh1pk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.213.15 with SMTP id l15mr250888wfg.87.1288851322477; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.114.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:15:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:15:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2296e3e9e150494341566 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2296e3e9e150494341566 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same discussion? Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice versa. Why not choose one and stick with it? Thanks, --Konst On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Cos, > > I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the > jira which makes it easier to follow. > > RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review > system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have > issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > It looks very hard to follow. > > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > > Especially when they interleave. > > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > > --Konstantin > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > >> > >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > >>> > >>> > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the > >>> > >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to review > >>> Hadoop JIRAS. > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> dhruba > >>> > >> > >> > > > --000e0cd2296e3e9e150494341566-- From general-return-2329-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 06:20:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45568 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 06:20:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 64744 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64597 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64589 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 06:20:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:20:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:20:46 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so801995ewy.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.16.72 with SMTP id n8mr315455eba.38.1288851625055; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.78 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:19:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:19:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Konstantin, have you seen how you can comment on patches and see side by side the changes in RB? It is quite handy. Alejandro On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and > code-level discussion on RB. > > This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same > discussion? > Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice > versa. > Why not choose one and stick with it? > > Thanks, > --Konst > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > Hey Cos, > > > > I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the > > jira which makes it easier to follow. > > > > RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review > > system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have > > issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > > > It looks very hard to follow. > > > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > > > Especially when they interleave. > > > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > >> > > >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > > >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > > >>> > > >>> > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the > > >>> > > >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to > review > > >>> Hadoop JIRAS. > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > > >>> > > >>> thanks, > > >>> dhruba > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --0015174c3fce47c79d0494342737-- From general-return-2330-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 06:49:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56833 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 06:49:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 06:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 79481 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:50:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79145 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79137 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 06:50:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:50:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:50:18 +0000 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so998890qyk.14 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.214.5 with SMTP id gy5mr268795qab.215.1288853397866; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:49:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > =A0> I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira an= d > code-level discussion on RB. > > This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same > discussion? > Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice ver= sa. > Why not choose one and stick with it? For a lot of jiras issue level discussion (what's the problem? how should we solve it?) is very different from code level discussion (does this code do what we claim it should? Is it sufficient to be checked in?). Thanks, Eli > > Thanks, > --Konst > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Hey Cos, >> >> I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the >> jira which makes it easier to follow. >> >> RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review >> system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have >> issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> wrote: >> > It looks very hard to follow. >> > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. >> > Especially when they interleave. >> > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? >> > --Konstantin >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy >> wrote: >> > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >> >> >> >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance >> >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. >> >>> >> >>> >> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the >> >>> >> >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to revi= ew >> >>> Hadoop JIRAS. >> >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 >> >>> >> >>> thanks, >> >>> dhruba >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > From general-return-2331-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 06:58:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57549 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 06:58:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 06:58:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 82219 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:59:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82160 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 06:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82149 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 06:59:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:59:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:59:13 +0000 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so136884pzk.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GXoST9EyMwE+wUWTvq6uSCIH4ng2krRnTxycs/HWNrI=; b=kC01LmYmLZrk8/me+hUNoKJTYx/M5GDbYalcBQqYAbuCps5tO/vODD+HODA2cdhIY5 t3Zdrm7mSukWgSjVArPs8uL1qs6H0VEIPKjTbyfzeBYl1G4zH8dkMTCopbMg4J0YD86Q lwKv19PT5z3pGrPnrqS4FL+XiDQK5GZri6wD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=omJwDYli5Dp1bWps+jFPauClGzKOAnrWBb6rsEO4Ll+h9krnKvOAHNs47Pd4I88cg9 SELsC59bzC5Bpl68yIX8xXrp8BKOxamksKD1Di3S2J0UlRKbe8x0SULAmReYKssKCLsC +wGX524yOgtvOinldxHtKgoixBkxKGwTwHOic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.144.7 with SMTP id r7mr256682wfd.258.1288853931149; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.114.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:58:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:58:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd328e8bbc7c6049434b0a8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd328e8bbc7c6049434b0a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, it is pretty handy. It would be really cool to have it integrated with Jira. But having comments in two different places is extremely distracting. Is it only me who finds it hard to match jira messages with RB ones, and duplicating the descriptions, affected versions, etc. in both systems? --Konstantin On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Hey Konstantin, > > have you seen how you can comment on patches and see side by side the > changes in RB? > > It is quite handy. > > Alejandro > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >wrote: > > > > I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira and > > code-level discussion on RB. > > > > This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the same > > discussion? > > Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or vice > > versa. > > Why not choose one and stick with it? > > > > Thanks, > > --Konst > > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > > > Hey Cos, > > > > > > I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments to the > > > jira which makes it easier to follow. > > > > > > RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code review > > > system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have > > > issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion on RB. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eli > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > wrote: > > > > It looks very hard to follow. > > > > I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. > > > > Especially when they interleave. > > > > Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? > > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board instance > > > >>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the > > > >>> > > > >>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to > > review > > > >>> Hadoop JIRAS. > > > >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 > > > >>> > > > >>> thanks, > > > >>> dhruba > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --000e0cd328e8bbc7c6049434b0a8-- From general-return-2332-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 07:02:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58450 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 07:02:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 07:02:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 84494 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 07:02:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84371 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 07:02:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84363 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 07:02:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:02:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:02:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c52.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.52]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oA470w4J041268 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:00:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1288854059; bh=pHN/z6eVpsDkxIIa+pGt/QENkQPO84VXana3AJQcXFE=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=hcEPgdqSCgqqY32oZVRCOUlbGIhtpeYrHK2GbcMQLzqeOFfO5q1Jkx9wBz8a2xi0r IFuacgMz3h+VLbVj89Mq3WHvAxnllVOjGfyAlxibk2WaL/kEXZqCw4gWt8pUJfUyui X4ofed8NutdvJxQsOo2RHyhI9voOL+u0wC32r6jg= Message-Id: <7767ED1D-124C-4976-99A3-99530CA9C605@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop code reviews on ReviewBoard? Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:00:58 -0700 References: <33C92F80-1C08-48D0-AF52-162FF6BB0379@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Konst, Todd has volunteered to get RB to send msgs directly to jira, that should help... Arun On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Yes, it is pretty handy. It would be really cool to have it > integrated with > Jira. > But having comments in two different places is extremely distracting. > > Is it only me who finds it hard to match jira messages with RB ones, > and duplicating the descriptions, affected versions, etc. in both > systems? > > --Konstantin > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur > wrote: > >> Hey Konstantin, >> >> have you seen how you can comment on patches and see side by side the >> changes in RB? >> >> It is quite handy. >> >> Alejandro >> >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> wrote: >> >>>> I think the idea is to have issue/design-level discussion on jira >>>> and >>> code-level discussion on RB. >>> >>> This is exactly my question. Why do we need two places to have the >>> same >>> discussion? >>> Even if the comments are automatically replicated in jira and/or >>> vice >>> versa. >>> Why not choose one and stick with it? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --Konst >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eli Collins >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Cos, >>>> >>>> I think the setup used for Hive and HBase posts the RB comments >>>> to the >>>> jira which makes it easier to follow. >>>> >>>> RB isn't a second system for tracking issues, jira isn't a code >>>> review >>>> system, and RB isn't an issue tracker. I think the idea is to have >>>> issue/design-level discussion on jira and code-level discussion >>>> on RB. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eli >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>> wrote: >>>>> It looks very hard to follow. >>>>> I have really hard time matching jira and review board comments. >>>>> Especially when they interleave. >>>>> Why again do we need a second system for tracking issues? >>>>> --Konstantin >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Arun C Murthy >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw an ASF announcement that there's now a review board >>>>>> instance >>>>>>> available, it will be nice if we can try it out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I filed the following JIRA to see if we can use review board to >>> review >>>>>>> Hadoop JIRAS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3108 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> dhruba >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> From general-return-2333-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 11:58:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65334 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 11:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 11:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 31691 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 11:59:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31461 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 11:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31450 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 11:59:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:59:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:59:14 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oA4BwQlf025502 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 04:58:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1288871907; bh=OBbtINSufch1Y10Pt8oDxRKG6mI528JMC97GV8gbRWg=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=A8bAjudRqGdqZc2LySuezpGU44xNgbcU7S9QJ742CXc8/sd6K4FXS09vIAVDIOYrP AyARdD6rzDdP+Gn5l33g6wO/3Lrxjyg0/aOCNcMScvFs7iKSKgRM09W2b3/5Y1LzgG 3IsKKqoAFizpl1vFwZsC1Lm4bffFxPOX2FXWyxto= Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:28:26 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:28:11 +0530 Subject: Re: web-based file transfer Thread-Topic: web-based file transfer Thread-Index: Act6u2HNx5BSRl6vQtil6xKpsp646gBXCutS Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C8F89DAB477AAsvenkatyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C8F89DAB477AAsvenkatyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is also HDFS Proxy in the contrib that only does Listing & Stream fil= e now over HTTP. But we are very close to getting the next version of Prox= y with R+W (full FS access). Venkatesh On 11/2/10 11:55 PM, "Mark Laffoon" wrote: We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). Thanks, Mark --_000_C8F89DAB477AAsvenkatyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2334-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 04 19:39:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34279 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 19:39:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 19:39:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 45421 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 19:40:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44227 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 19:40:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44208 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 19:40:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:40:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:39:56 +0000 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so2097257bwz.35 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:39:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VlD7+xAGT5ar4WTjV/KBElxfXiO8Z1KuYhKtvUCplnI=; b=fpOeZI01JnV2Tp1gaDF7ECMDkPniZQ/8LQrXTM+TM+coAITlkEYagTmz3rJCPPXQ+P Q0zva0KcLKkjLDoYxwfPkoN4UZFVXDE/wtRtjM8aNsChBGz8cdrppSxGQyhl2T0fccOG ATkwcIIchyje4Tg9sk41oc9iBQgazzWhPAZoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=hF99Kt08wlDZC5h9IJspMty0EPctKOhN6kkGZXHsOeoa18hCCpKXrHGD57mqCIqdAy esH9jT/aIas/UJAP5sl2bzk1Gm85t5z7SJhBRQSp54LMmkZGb3YE+DdlL1z/Ek13VBEB Rq2uu3GJR/uNQncYmMrC5xFbuzAmFh8O3grtU= Received: by 10.204.104.5 with SMTP id m5mr1034385bko.47.1288899576449; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:39:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.76.193 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:39:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: San Francisco Hadoop meetup To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e13d67cce004943f5111 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7e13d67cce004943f5111 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Hadoop fans, The Bay Area Hadoop User Group meetups are a long hike for those of us who come from San Francisco. I'd like to gauge interest in SF-centric Hadoop gatherings. In contrast to the presentation-based format of the usual HUG meetings, I'm interested in holding events that are more discussion-based: an environment facilitating people who are working on similar problems to share tips for handling common scenarios and identify common goals for development. Of course, if you have a relevant presentation that would benefit the group as a whole, such offers are gladly accepted. All industries welcome. If you'd like to come, I'd encourage you to think of a two minute summary about what you're working on with Hadoop, areas you're interested in learning more about, and/or challenges that you're facing that might be addressed by a larger Hadoop community. We can build the discussion from there, and may break into smaller groups. All are welcome (developers, users, or managers; experienced or newbies). Though I'd like to hold this in San Francisco, folks from outside the city are of course welcome too. If you're interested in joining us, please fill out the following: * I've created a short survey to help understand days / times that would work for the most people: http://bit.ly/ajK26U * Please also join the meetup group at http://meetup.com/hadoopsf -- We'll use this to plan the event, RSVP information, etc. I'm looking forward to meeting more of you! - Aaron Kimball --0016e6d7e13d67cce004943f5111-- From general-return-2335-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 01:47:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41992 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 01:47:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 01:47:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10679 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 01:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10602 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 01:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10594 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 01:48:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:48:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeba.ride@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:48:17 +0000 Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so2193687iwn.35 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:47:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=k+RlUtzy4Jly086BCX0iJZ4UKT783vuN0PYtSSqGtZQ=; b=VmBLTnm93GjzCfU0OMkppK9y+cABKmnjj9+9rZKl1Ow0pdCzUehjl6/hqlv91LBs7v /P1OFKmaOxacIJoaJlr9qGcYGHkIUbQwsVK5hi8Gb7i7yuRMMrU1DsT8317qsHTfGwkY O2Hja4pnuy/U0152yLpdtP9Xg4ToV/MpByTSk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PQb7SXOukCvpH8LGutAr2mNNjv60dQ1M+PS38uVf8c2rBlD/GMtbTrU+jdBqYrk6ck 1fC6QbiO9Tdc3bd1UWrY8WoiV3537UhHrH24wNdkJj88eEfa8ejM1wGoygQDaOu5icDc v9ViR772qn4po4rjvr4RdapetKc4wemh5OHa4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.204.67 with SMTP id fl3mr943522icb.406.1288921677464; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.30.70 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 18:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:17:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Keeping Different folders for Different Hadoop Datanodes From: Clement Jebakumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303ea25eba82e004944476ca --20cf303ea25eba82e004944476ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, Is there a way to specify different folder paths to different datanode instances in Hadoop? I need to attach a another harddisk to a PC and want to use it for hadoop. Is it possible? *Clement Jebakumar,* 111/27 Keelamutharamman Kovil Street, Tenkasi, 627 811 http://www.declum.com/clement.html --20cf303ea25eba82e004944476ca-- From general-return-2336-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 04:39:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5037 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 04:39:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 04:39:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 4349 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 04:39:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4183 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 04:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4175 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 04:39:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:39:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:39:32 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2159303fxm.35 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=RyvQqmm1s3QhMvEt/37tbTGaWOSYnFjiPDgUcGJ5Z3k=; b=JcO4SvYh8jlni4CgtRRMIXbC8MmjlIuMee52SozyFn5MX63JhbyHs99ZqfYy5KDD0w KVopHCvhNTRWzPCaLRn0GdCKfHIdTm1yARrdCb5HQDV0+LNun/VHVHfeB5yg7ETHupwW rcQi9USRTjjnxL5gDnHR0a5HT2ZcTcrkBWRz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=DGkmlPliKGBoj4amr+G81Ld5P2yKZ4CT4o6dwiOo7Wo3Q2NexFY2BN2XulM9Se0uTs ldrVOYiqQfRhrWE9Pirl4VfbKBrSK02aRNfuzyNql90uD9zu5m9a27nXH5xdsmcktWFT HAeisPhXmlzH2nYWdBMkdXFA6U98W5Bzg+H6A= Received: by 10.223.119.132 with SMTP id z4mr521976faq.31.1288931951072; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:39:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.80 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:38:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:08:50 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Keeping Different folders for Different Hadoop Datanodes To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Clement Jebakumar wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to specify different folder paths to different datanode > instances in Hadoop? The property "dfs.data.dir" can be a comma separated list of paths, enabling a DataNode to use more than one mount point for itself. To run multiple DataNode instances itself on a single machine (which isn't a good idea in production), see this discussion: http://search-hadoop.com/m/sApJY1zWgQV > I need to attach a another harddisk to a PC and want to use it for hadoop. > Is it possible? Yes, just modify the "dfs.data.dir" property to reflect the new mount point location and restart your DataNode. Copy a selection of data already residing on your HDFS, to balance things between the disks (you can delete the older copy of those files after the operation). > > *Clement Jebakumar,* > 111/27 Keelamutharamman Kovil Street, > Tenkasi, 627 811 > http://www.declum.com/clement.html > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2337-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 14:29:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43111 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 14:29:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 14:29:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16834 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 14:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15251 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 14:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15223 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 14:30:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:30:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.24] (HELO qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:29:57 +0000 Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TNxT1f0090mv7h052SVdUP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:29:37 +0000 Received: from [10.20.90.238] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id TSVM1f0012VBGtd3XSVRx8; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:29:35 +0000 Message-Id: <4E8C27CF-9715-453C-A17F-EA7ED2C19DF2@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4--724969474 Subject: A discussion of a new Powered By Hadoop logo Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:29:19 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-4--724969474 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, There is a discussion about creating a new "Powered by Hadoop" logo that is happening on Jira at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 if anyone has any graphical talent. I prefer a version based on Apache's logo. Here is an example from the Tomcat project. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/sandbox/comet/webapps/ROOT/tomcat-power.gif http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat.gif -- Owen --Apple-Mail-4--724969474-- From general-return-2338-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 18:34:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14272 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 18:34:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 18:34:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 33762 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 18:35:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33264 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 18:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32957 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 18:35:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:35:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:35:12 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so1092011gxk.35 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Co4SpVNYeKbAxswhrkN2tEqFggVraoBzG2NmcBbYmTk=; b=BbTV8R7mYXszV5XzXfjVrdlKIBMy/vqka6MV8ojOQbjnzQH0DOluWsQfpBrB9PnsyX PMVaTSOqPB3jjMh1Qjm5bfoBzLzRRZHTZpl22H8Ta2wHv1L7iH+q6bD3OhG69fQrj8Kd Y7w8sKZJhSvZgdA/B0Ct0qXVvVz5eewZgIuck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PCobxXsxTwJ7CmVdLHgO70QqVoutxfkK1bIi9O3pr2qz8geKui1NyPnFVgR1uQkGT1 LqOFxOfqm2MxUqdpkCZ4r8mNIxMEJPhuQH2uvCAFm7GMIlRqqOhapqGFSKK3wVEcgJOz YZxlsM2qVgsSGfdKvHkux1QNNzmetwtDGvqwc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.27.26 with SMTP id e26mr1727427agj.19.1288982091098; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.89.7 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:34:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Announcing Sizzle, a compiler and runtime for the Sawzall language From: Anthony Urso To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am pleased to announce the v0.0 release of Sizzle, a compiler and runtime for the Sawzall language. Sizzle targets Hadoop directly, by compiling Sawzall programs into Hadoop job jars that can be run anywhere Hadoop is installed, without requiring a Sawzall interpreter to also be present. Although the current release should be considered developer preview release, it is currently possible to run non-trivial Sawzall programs on a 0.21 Hadoop cluster or your local desktop. More information here: https://github.com/anthonyu/Sizzle/wiki and all code is available from: https://github.com/anthonyu/Sizzle Please try it out, and let me know any problems you experience via github issues, @SizzleLanguage, or this email address. Cheers, Anthony From general-return-2339-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 20:08:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85965 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 20:08:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 20:08:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 42563 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 20:09:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42498 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 20:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42490 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 20:09:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:09:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:09:17 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so1605055wwb.29 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:08:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.161.17 with SMTP id v17mr1605437wek.1.1288987736752; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.239.200 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:08:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E8C27CF-9715-453C-A17F-EA7ED2C19DF2@apache.org> References: <4E8C27CF-9715-453C-A17F-EA7ED2C19DF2@apache.org> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:08:56 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A discussion of a new Powered By Hadoop logo From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb44f2b8492049453d8b9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367fb44f2b8492049453d8b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What other projects usually do is announce a contest, and let the user base decide. shall we start one up? On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > There is a discussion about creating a new "Powered by Hadoop" logo that > is happening on Jira at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020if anyone has any graphical talent. I prefer a version based on Apache's > logo. Here is an example from the Tomcat project. > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/sandbox/comet/webapps/ROOT/tomcat-power.gif > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat.gif > > -- Owen --0016367fb44f2b8492049453d8b9-- From general-return-2340-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 20:15:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89373 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 20:15:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 20:15:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 53362 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53295 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53287 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:15:53 +0000 Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so2885716qyk.14 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:15:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IxWy9mjFGnR4XCqrB+WOx7JOiL7KG0QedcBupB1EIlI=; b=ZjaiP6cQHZx6+Dy6b+JKRMZTztQlqsdmwPFFFtC+Mm8dt8cHh8zDUafOPQv0buM7Dh rBZRM3ScRc8b8psS0L7WzZM8tduxur97AFogOPzlPnaN1yIjzO6fQtcLO/Adgl+LqQ+p Ryp75jgE75yh1B0ntV2j5H/NpPR8gDru6cMjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jyGVvUdsNsIoJw/psEypcggUvWEU8XO6IQ8PN4hKJoL0QnOCD1YhtetMQtdY8D00Sl m6Q/9nFFUEFxrQnRh8u1yEE0fGbRap7foJDaOaL9BxzT5dChmj/ZQQsgpfbWbRFYAa4z XlrRVjOW02okTHAVlA8r7AZu2hXki0K3IF5XM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.173.26 with SMTP id n26mr1321181qaz.360.1288988132852; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E8C27CF-9715-453C-A17F-EA7ED2C19DF2@apache.org> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A discussion of a new Powered By Hadoop logo From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325573576c7456e049453efcc --000325573576c7456e049453efcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think Logo that has been suggested/posted somehow doesn't mean or seem more like the hadoop elephant, the helmet is overpowerering. Again, that is my perception. So a contest would be a good idea, with so much discussion already happening. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > What other projects usually do is announce a contest, and let the user base > decide. > shall we start one up? > > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > All, > > There is a discussion about creating a new "Powered by Hadoop" logo > that > > is happening on Jira at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020if anyone has any > graphical talent. I prefer a version based on Apache's > > logo. Here is an example from the Tomcat project. > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/sandbox/comet/webapps/ROOT/tomcat-power.gif > > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat.gif > > > > -- Owen > --000325573576c7456e049453efcc-- From general-return-2341-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 21:34:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34832 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 21:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 21:34:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 93427 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 21:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93345 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 21:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93337 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 21:35:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:35:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.186.241.227] (HELO sri01.semanticresearch.local) (64.186.241.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:35:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) by sri01.semanticresearch.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CB13060002 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:34:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sri01.semanticresearch.local Received: from sri01.semanticresearch.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mG8r+jge9ILL for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sri01.semanticresearch.local (sri01.semanticresearch.local [127.0.0.1]) by sri01.semanticresearch.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE2E3060001 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark Laffoon" To: References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A152@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A152@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <056e01cb7d31$3f54e970$bdfebc50$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.13_GA_2791.RHEL5 (ZimbraConnectorForOutlook/5.0.2893.13) Thread-Index: Act7cP6h/AoLuUpGTa+NPpITyj0u4wAOt7oDAGE/eeA= Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [172.27.16.186] Robert, What are the performance characteristics like for the webdav solution? I ask for two reasons: since it is implemented over tcp it probably isn't much faster than http fileupload; I've had previous experience with webdav (on top of object stores) and we found the protocol to be very "chatty". Since our use-case is fairly simple (just need to transfer lots of files from lots of clients; navigating the results isn't necessary), will the webdav solution be too much? Comments? Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group [mailto:Robert.Gibbon@vodafone.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:20 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Check out HDFS over WebDAV - http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/Home/hdfs-over-webdav WebDAV is an HTTP based protocol for accessing remote filesystems. I'm running an adapted version of this. It runs under Jetty which is pretty industry standard and is built on Apache JackRabbit which is pretty production stable too. I lashed together a custom JAAS authentication module to authenticate it against our user database. You can mount WebDAV on Linux using FUSE and WDFS, or script sessions with cadaver on Solaris/Unix without mounting WebDav. It works pretty sweet on Windows and Apple, too. Recent versions of Jetty have built in traffic shaping and QoS features, although you might get more mileage from HAProxy or a hardware loadbalancer. It works pretty sweet as it enforces HDFS permissions (if you have them enabled). To get Hadoop permission integrity enforced on MapReduce jobs check out Oozie - it's a job submission proxy which runs under Tomcat (might work with Jetty too - haven't tried) and can use a custom ServletFilter for authentication which you can also patch onto your own user database/directory. Then you just need to seal the perimeter of your cluster with Firewall rules and you're good to go No more Kerberos! R -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com] Sent: Wed 11/3/2010 5:05 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: web-based file transfer Something like it, but Chukwa is more similar to Flume. For *files* one may want something slightly different. For a stream of (data) events, Chukwa, Flume, or Scribe are appropriate. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Doesn't chukwa do something like this? > > --- > Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 > > I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangelo > > On 03/11/2010, at 5:44 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like >> this for a few reasons. >> >> 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public >> network; you don't want to do this. >> 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS which >> isn't its strong point. >> >> From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing >> system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can >> throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate >> the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single >> writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple >> competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to >> operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while >> being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is >> to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple >> boxes and distribute the work. >> >> Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with the >> fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats >> their contents as individual events, etc. >> http://github.com/cloudera/flume. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon >> wrote: >>> We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, >>> whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious >>> simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I >>> was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where >>> the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration >>> information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a starting >>> point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-2342-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 21:44:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38767 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 21:44:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 21:44:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 6405 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 21:45:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6338 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 21:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6328 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 21:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:45:05 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2833508fxm.35 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IvRnTBlRHrq8cx6rut6gn/HDcMDvfmgaLjihxZVP8hs=; b=uq2PK85akoarU6xVKpvWtDBfeWa9sAbJJFm9qytBOoFYpI2Mor41my2tEd9Z6kY1vB 6gEWUVJteDa/dYjJbS8UbeirWY/s6x60QWFzKAsYrtmvF1PgjqlWNdpPG/XSSGWR18Tp u+gLWH4sHsErOnAMpZnxTvV47JR5FocmfW7ow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NBQHq0UjphPHIuVN9GruGTxa1UoxOdqtsUf4BlaQr+6KChB2AB86iMuOyM8BOQKGHR ty6BDFOxfGxs2+KdX7zevQovvAQTPIaUzpecb9g5lx3/O3eCDTX0xIiOAOvmGj16uL2S x3NHmyhKeD9aB/nvvuRROvHNwp89xqDx+Fqwg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.133 with SMTP id l5mr1419888far.52.1288993484096; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.114.74 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] Next Munich OpenHUG Meeting From: Lars George To: nosql-discussion@googlegroups.com, general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Next Munich OpenHUG Meeting I am pleased to invite you to our next Munich Open Hadoop User Group Meetin= g! Like always we are looking forward to see everyone again and are welcoming new attendees to join our group. We are enthusiast about all things related to scalable, distributed storage system. We are not limiting us to a particular system but appreciate anyone who would like to share about their experiences. Please note the change in location for this meeting. When: Thursday November 25th, 2010 at 4:30pm (open end) Where: SKYTEC AG, Keltenring 11, D-82041 Oberhaching, M=FCnchen (map can be found here: http://www.skytecag.com/unternehmen/ueber-uns/locations/anfa= hrtsplan-muenchen/) Thanks to Paul Rogalinski and Skytec AG (http://www.skytecag.com/) for helping organize the event and for providing the infrastructure. We have quite a few very interesting talks scheduled: - "Map/Reduce Einf=FChrung mit HelloWorld Beispielen in Java und stdin/out (Shell-Skripte)" by Paul Rogalinski - "CouchDB und MongoDB - Pitfalls und Gr=FCnde f=FCr Einsatz im Enterprise / J2EE Umfeld" by Marc Weinberger - "SOLR: Prototypen mit Velocity, dynamischer Index." by Chantal Ackermann - "Datenmodellierung und Architektur beim Einsatz von Semantik-Web-Technologien in der Praxis" by Sacha Berger - "Hadoop and HBase - Ein =DCberblick" by Lars George As usual this is followed by an open discussion at a nearby pub/restaurant so that we can also enjoy some food and beers. We do have a sponsor for that, thanks to Sistrix (http://www.sistrix.de/)! Please RSVP here: Xing: http://www.xing.com/events/munich-openhug-meeting-593962 Yahoo Upcoming: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/7279395/BY/Oberhaching/Munich-OpenHUG-Meeti= ng/Skytec-AG LinkedIn: http://events.linkedin.com/Munich-OpenHUG-Meeting/pub/477768 Looking forward to seeing you there! Best regards, Lars From general-return-2343-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 05 23:20:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81220 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 23:20:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2010 23:20:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8449 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 23:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8398 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2010 23:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8390 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2010 23:20:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.74] (HELO mailout05.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:20:25 +0000 Received: from mailint05 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout05 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853E41469E5 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:20:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs02.internal.vodafone.com (unknown [145.230.4.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint05 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A8411463F7 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:20:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs02.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:20:03 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB7D3F.F934D29A" Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 00:19:09 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A159@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A159@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Thread-Topic: web-based file transfer Thread-Index: Act7cP6h/AoLuUpGTa+NPpITyj0u4wAOt7oDAGE/eeAAA79+3A== References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A152@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> <056e01cb7d31$3f54e970$bdfebc50$@com> From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2010 23:20:03.0903 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9E35CF0:01CB7D3F] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7D3F.F934D29A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > What are the performance characteristics like for the webdav solution? The HDFS over WebDAV setup is horizontally scalable, just keep adding = Jettys and put a round-robin VIP on the front. It is stateless so = there's no need for sticky session. It is not especially chatty unless doing complex directory traversals - = HTTP/Put & HTTP/Get - much the same as most REST implementations in = fact. For us, it's more than good enough. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Laffoon [mailto:mlaffoon@semanticresearch.com] Sent: Fri 11/5/2010 10:34 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: web-based file transfer =20 Robert, What are the performance characteristics like for the webdav solution? I ask for two reasons: since it is implemented over tcp it probably isn't much faster than http fileupload; I've had previous experience with = webdav (on top of object stores) and we found the protocol to be very "chatty". Since our use-case is fairly simple (just need to transfer lots of files from lots of clients; navigating the results isn't necessary), will the webdav solution be too much? Comments? Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group [mailto:Robert.Gibbon@vodafone.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:20 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Check out HDFS over WebDAV - http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/Home/hdfs-over-webdav WebDAV is an HTTP based protocol for accessing remote filesystems. I'm running an adapted version of this. It runs under Jetty which is pretty industry standard and is built on Apache JackRabbit which is = pretty production stable too. I lashed together a custom JAAS authentication module to authenticate it against our user database. You can mount WebDAV on Linux using FUSE and WDFS, or script sessions = with cadaver on Solaris/Unix without mounting WebDav. It works pretty sweet = on Windows and Apple, too.=20 Recent versions of Jetty have built in traffic shaping and QoS features, although you might get more mileage from HAProxy or a hardware loadbalancer. It works pretty sweet as it enforces HDFS permissions (if you have them enabled). To get Hadoop permission integrity enforced on MapReduce jobs check out Oozie - it's a job submission proxy which runs under Tomcat (might work with Jetty too - haven't tried) and can use a custom ServletFilter for authentication which you can also patch onto your own user database/directory.=20 Then you just need to seal the perimeter of your cluster with Firewall rules and you're good to go No more Kerberos! R -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com] Sent: Wed 11/3/2010 5:05 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: web-based file transfer =20 Something like it, but Chukwa is more similar to Flume. For *files* one may want something slightly different. For a stream of (data) events, Chukwa, Flume, or Scribe are appropriate. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Doesn't chukwa do something like this? > > --- > Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 > > I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangelo > > On 03/11/2010, at 5:44 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> I would recommend against clients pushing data directly to hdfs like >> this for a few reasons. >> >> 1. The HDFS cluster would need to be directly exposed to a public >> network; you don't want to do this. >> 2. You'd be applying (presumably) a high concurrent load to HDFS = which >> isn't its strong point. >> >> From an architecture point of view, it's much nicer to have a queuing >> system between the upload and ingestion into HDFS that you can >> throttle and control, if necessary. This also allows you to isolate >> the cluster from the outside world. As to not bottleneck on a single >> writer, you can have uploaded files land in a queue and have multiple >> competing consumers popping files (or file names upon which to >> operate) out of the queue and handling the writing in parallel while >> being able to control the number of workers. If the initial upload is >> to a shared device like NFS, you can have writers live on multiple >> boxes and distribute the work. >> >> Another option is to consider Flume, but only if you can deal with = the >> fact that it effectively throws away the notion of files and treats >> their contents as individual events, etc. >> http://github.com/cloudera/flume. >> >> Hope that helps. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mark Laffoon >> wrote: >>> We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java applet, >>> whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The = obvious >>> simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to hdfs. I >>> was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet where >>> the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration >>> information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into = hdfs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Has anybody done this or something similar? Can you give me a = starting >>> point (I'm about to go wander through the hadoop CLI code to get ideas). >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > --=20 Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7D3F.F934D29A-- From general-return-2344-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 14:34:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38522 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 14:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 14:34:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 50936 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:34:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48993 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48964 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 14:34:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:34:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shujamughal@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:34:46 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2442367wyf.35 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:34:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LBQ7BlwLMdf/CVK9k+9XM7smV287ZNw65bRFG/e+BeE=; b=NemdiTGkCiBYGPgu6kw1YJWMXZHfSFxVvGUqH0wt7Y5yuXAnxUmKNhOtB7nWo67hD9 TI6Lq1/QDKZgm5Ry47aLDxxWTIPm92tYQTR5K3VsleeGcK+CwjJJA+apoywdgHyqqL/s Jht7KzcJkRRCznk0drAO3Y7CwyoUdtZFTXTR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YOQOVE9kWTm+9aUY1aLIfuiYsFlgdwNbeqOHoAnHUd+agiOnpJ8O+UHNLDqxXkugrj Oz3FVLVeWi32HGKdo1UtksBsZFrt85u6giXS3OwfNm8k/JaJDHiEGhsTOnqtzxMQpKyo /uk2rLkrFRehwuwMUNykYZk4Eo+uW3X70Q/cE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.68.21 with SMTP id k21mr75718wed.107.1289226865374; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.10.69 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:34:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:34:25 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop From: Shuja Rehman To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0f7a858779004948b851c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0ce0f7a858779004948b851c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi I have cluster of 4 machines and want to configure ganglia for monitoring purpose. I have read the wiki and add the following lines to hadoop-metrics.properties on each machine. dfs.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext dfs.period=10 dfs.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 mapred.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext mapred.period=10 mapred.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 jvm.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext jvm.period=10 jvm.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 rpc.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext rpc.period=10 rpc.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 where 10.10.10.2 is the machine where i am running gmeated and web front end. Will I need to same ip in all machine as i do here or need to give machine own ip in each file? and is there anything more to do to setup it with hadoop? -- Regards Shuja-ur-Rehman Baig --000e0ce0f7a858779004948b851c-- From general-return-2345-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 14:42:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42030 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 14:42:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 14:42:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 65432 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:42:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64790 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64753 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 14:42:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:42:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 65.55.88.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:42:27 +0000 Received: from mail17-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.250) by TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.9.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:42:06 +0000 Received: from mail17-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail17-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E1014D84B6; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -19 X-BigFish: VPS-19(zz1432N98dN9371Pzz1202hzz8275bhz2ei2a8h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB045.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail17-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail17-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1289227326300734_18469; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.251]) by mail17-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B9920051; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB045.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (10.9.99.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:42:05 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.17]) by VA3DIAHUB045.RED001.local ([10.32.21.119]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:41:53 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:41:43 -0800 Subject: Re: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Topic: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Index: Act/UxVeIDr0ooh7R0uJqxJI0ECXiQ== Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com SWYgSSByZW1lbWJlciBjb3JyZWN0bHkgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgY29uZmlnIHVzZXMgbXVsdGljYXN0 IHNvIHlvdSBzaG9pbGQgY29uZmlndXJlIHRoZW0gYWxsIHdpdGggdGhlIHNhbWUNCm11bHRpY2Fz dCBpcC4gU29tZSBndWlkZXMgaGF2ZSB5b3Ugc3dhcCB0aGF0IG91dCB3aXRoIFVEUCBzbyBpZiB5 b3UgZGlkIHRoYXQgdGhlbiB5b3Ugc2hvdWxkIGhhdmUgdGhlIGlwIHlvdSBoYXZlIGluIHRoZXJl LiBUaGlzIGlzIGluIHRoZSAnTGlzdGVuZXInIGFuZCAnU2VuZGVyJyBwYXJ0IG9mIHRoZSBHYW5n bGlhIGNvbmZpZy4NCg0KVGhlcmUgYXJlIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgcGFyYW1ldGVycyB3aGljaCBnbyBp biB0aGUgaGRmcyBjb25maWcgd2hpY2ggdGVsbCBpdCB0byBzZW5kIGRhdGEgdG8gR2FuZ2xpYSB3 aGljaCB3aGlsZSBub3QgcmVxdWlyZWQgd2lsbCBnaXZlIHlvdSBIYWRvb3Agc3BlY2lmaWMgbWV0 cmljcy4NCg0KSSB3b3VsZCBiZSBoYXBweSB0byBzZW5kIG1vcmUgZGV0YWlsIHdoZW4gSSBhcnJp dmUgYXQgbXkgb2ZmaWNlIGlmIG5vIG9uZSBlbHNlIGhhcyBhbnN3ZXJlZC4NCg0KDQoNCk9uIE5v diA4LCAyMDEwLCBhdCA4OjM2IEFNLCAiU2h1amEgUmVobWFuIiA8c2h1amFtdWdoYWxAZ21haWwu Y29tPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPiBIaQ0KPiBJIGhhdmUgY2x1c3RlciBvZiA0IG1hY2hpbmVzIGFuZCB3 YW50IHRvIGNvbmZpZ3VyZSBnYW5nbGlhIGZvciBtb25pdG9yaW5nDQo+IHB1cnBvc2UuIEkgaGF2 ZSByZWFkIHRoZSB3aWtpIGFuZCBhZGQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBsaW5lcyB0bw0KPiBoYWRvb3At bWV0cmljcy5wcm9wZXJ0aWVzIG9uIGVhY2ggbWFjaGluZS4NCj4gDQo+IGRmcy5jbGFzcz1vcmcu YXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2FuZ2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCj4gZGZzLnBlcmlv ZD0xMA0KPiBkZnMuc2VydmVycz0xMC4xMC4xMC4yOjg2NDkNCj4gDQo+IG1hcHJlZC5jbGFzcz1v cmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2FuZ2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCj4gbWFwcmVk LnBlcmlvZD0xMA0KPiBtYXByZWQuc2VydmVycz0xMC4xMC4xMC4yOjg2NDkNCj4gDQo+IGp2bS5j bGFzcz1vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2FuZ2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCj4g anZtLnBlcmlvZD0xMA0KPiBqdm0uc2VydmVycz0xMC4xMC4xMC4yOjg2NDkNCj4gDQo+IHJwYy5j bGFzcz1vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2FuZ2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCj4g cnBjLnBlcmlvZD0xMA0KPiBycGMuc2VydmVycz0xMC4xMC4xMC4yOjg2NDkNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiB3 aGVyZSAxMC4xMC4xMC4yIGlzIHRoZSBtYWNoaW5lIHdoZXJlIGkgYW0gcnVubmluZyBnbWVhdGVk IGFuZCB3ZWIgZnJvbnQNCj4gZW5kLiBXaWxsICBJIG5lZWQgdG8gc2FtZSBpcCBpbiBhbGwgbWFj aGluZSBhcyBpIGRvIGhlcmUgb3IgbmVlZCB0byBnaXZlDQo+IG1hY2hpbmUgb3duIGlwIGluIGVh Y2ggZmlsZT8gYW5kIGlzIHRoZXJlIGFueXRoaW5nIG1vcmUgdG8gZG8gdG8gc2V0dXAgaXQNCj4g d2l0aCBoYWRvb3A/DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IC0tIA0KPiBSZWdhcmRzDQo+IFNodWphLXVyLVJl aG1hbiBCYWlnDQo+IDxodHRwOi8vcGsubGlua2VkaW4uY29tL2luL3NodWphbXVnaGFsPg0K From general-return-2346-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 14:43:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42561 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 14:43:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 14:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 69874 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69494 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 14:43:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69470 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 14:43:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:43:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.32.180.11 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [216.32.180.11] (HELO VA3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com) (216.32.180.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:43:35 +0000 Received: from mail94-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.249) by VA3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.7.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:43:13 +0000 Received: from mail94-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail94-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747D0968484; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:43:13 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -19 X-BigFish: VPS-19(zz1432N98dN9371Pzz1202hzz8275bhz2ei2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB008.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail94-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail94-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 128922739372695_5581; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS030.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.235]) by mail94-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53547E004F; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB008.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by VA3EHSMHS030.bigfish.com (10.7.99.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:43:11 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.17]) by VA3DIAHUB008.RED001.local ([10.32.16.179]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:42:54 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:42:44 -0800 Subject: Re: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Topic: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Index: Act/Uzlr1Wly6DUrRFm63+OE0ZTFlA== Message-ID: <2025C303-04A3-4041-BCCD-ADE71ED6B178@Announcemedia.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org QW5kIGluIG15IHplYWwgdG8gYmUgaGVscGZ1bCBJIGRpZG4ndCBwcm9wZXJseSByZWFkIHlvdXIg cXVlc3Rpb24gc28gbXkgcmVzcG9uc2UgaXMgbW9zdGx5IHVzZWxlc3MuIDopDQoNCg0KDQpPbiBO b3YgOCwgMjAxMCwgYXQgODozNiBBTSwgIlNodWphIFJlaG1hbiIgPHNodWphbXVnaGFsQGdtYWls LmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4gSGkNCj4gSSBoYXZlIGNsdXN0ZXIgb2YgNCBtYWNoaW5lcyBhbmQg d2FudCB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgZ2FuZ2xpYSBmb3IgbW9uaXRvcmluZw0KPiBwdXJwb3NlLiBJIGhh dmUgcmVhZCB0aGUgd2lraSBhbmQgYWRkIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgbGluZXMgdG8NCj4gaGFkb29w LW1ldHJpY3MucHJvcGVydGllcyBvbiBlYWNoIG1hY2hpbmUuDQo+IA0KPiBkZnMuY2xhc3M9b3Jn LmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+IGRmcy5wZXJp b2Q9MTANCj4gZGZzLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBtYXByZWQuY2xhc3M9 b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+IG1hcHJl ZC5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4gbWFwcmVkLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBqdm0u Y2xhc3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+ IGp2bS5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4ganZtLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBycGMu Y2xhc3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+ IHJwYy5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4gcnBjLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiANCj4g d2hlcmUgMTAuMTAuMTAuMiBpcyB0aGUgbWFjaGluZSB3aGVyZSBpIGFtIHJ1bm5pbmcgZ21lYXRl ZCBhbmQgd2ViIGZyb250DQo+IGVuZC4gV2lsbCAgSSBuZWVkIHRvIHNhbWUgaXAgaW4gYWxsIG1h Y2hpbmUgYXMgaSBkbyBoZXJlIG9yIG5lZWQgdG8gZ2l2ZQ0KPiBtYWNoaW5lIG93biBpcCBpbiBl YWNoIGZpbGU/IGFuZCBpcyB0aGVyZSBhbnl0aGluZyBtb3JlIHRvIGRvIHRvIHNldHVwIGl0DQo+ IHdpdGggaGFkb29wPw0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAtLSANCj4gUmVnYXJkcw0KPiBTaHVqYS11ci1S ZWhtYW4gQmFpZw0KPiA8aHR0cDovL3BrLmxpbmtlZGluLmNvbS9pbi9zaHVqYW11Z2hhbD4NCg== From general-return-2347-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 15:31:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76350 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 15:31:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 15:31:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 90119 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 15:32:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89800 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 15:31:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89778 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 15:31:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:31:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.32.180.16 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [216.32.180.16] (HELO VA3EHSOBE009.bigfish.com) (216.32.180.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:31:52 +0000 Received: from mail24-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.240) by VA3EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.7.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:31:31 +0000 Received: from mail24-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5651128489; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:30:04 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -19 X-BigFish: VPS-19(zz1432N98dN9371Pzz1202hzz8275bhz2ei2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB044.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail24-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1289230203392322_18397; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.248]) by mail24-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C071C8804F; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB044.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by VA3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.7.99.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:31:27 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.17]) by VA3DIAHUB044.RED001.local ([10.32.21.118]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:31:27 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@hbase.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:31:06 -0800 Subject: Re: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Topic: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Index: Act/WgGnIlB9CTglQhqoWQnr57y9vw== Message-ID: <8280F561-1AE3-459E-8A94-C20B4CDD739A@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com VGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgY29ycmVjdCBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uLCBhbmQgdGhlcmUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIG5v dGhpbmcgbW9yZSBuZWVkZWQuIEkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCB0aGVzZSBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9u IGNoYW5nZXMgd2lsbCB0YWtlIGFmZmVjdCBvbiB0aGUgZmx5IHNvIHlvdSB3b3VsZCBuZWVkIHRv IHJlc3RhcnQgdGhlIGRhdGFub2RlIGFuZCBuYW1lbm9kZSBwcm9jZXNzZXMgaWYgSSB1bmRlcnN0 YW5kIGNvcnJlY3RseS4gDQoNCldoZW4geW91IGJyb3dzZSB5b3VyIHlvdSB3aWxsIHNlZSBzb21l IG1vcmUgbWV0cmljczoNCg0KZGZzLkZTRGlyZWN0b3J5LmZpbGVzX2RlbGV0ZWQNCmRmcy5GU05h bWVzeXN0ZW0uQmxvY2tDYXBhY2l0eQ0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5CbG9ja3NUb3RhbA0KZGZz LkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5DYXBhY2l0eVJlbWFpbmluZ0dCDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLkNhcGFj aXR5VG90YWxHQg0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5DYXBhY2l0eVVzZWRHQg0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5 c3RlbS5Db3JydXB0QmxvY2tzDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLkV4Y2Vzc0Jsb2Nrcw0KZGZzLkZT TmFtZXN5c3RlbS5GaWxlc1RvdGFsDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLk1pc3NpbmdCbG9ja3MNCmRm cy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uUGVuZGluZ0RlbGV0aW9uQmxvY2tzDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLlBl bmRpbmdSZXBsaWNhdGlvbkJsb2Nrcw0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5TY2hlZHVsZWRSZXBsaWNh dGlvbkJsb2Nrcw0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5Ub3RhbExvYWQNCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0u VW5kZXJSZXBsaWNhdGVkQmxvY2tzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tDaGVja3N1bU9wX2F2Z190 aW1lDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tDaGVja3N1bU9wX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5i bG9ja1JlcG9ydHNfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ibG9ja1JlcG9ydHNfbnVtX29wcw0K ZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJsb2NrX3ZlcmlmaWNhdGlvbl9mYWlsdXJlcw0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJs b2Nrc19yZWFkDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tzX3JlbW92ZWQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ibG9j a3NfcmVwbGljYXRlZA0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJsb2Nrc192ZXJpZmllZA0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2Rl LmJsb2Nrc193cml0dGVuDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYnl0ZXNfcmVhZA0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJ5 dGVzX3dyaXR0ZW4NCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5jb3B5QmxvY2tPcF9hdmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLmRhdGFu b2RlLmNvcHlCbG9ja09wX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5oZWFydEJlYXRzX2F2Z190aW1l DQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuaGVhcnRCZWF0c19udW1fb3BzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUucmVhZEJsb2Nr T3BfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5yZWFkQmxvY2tPcF9udW1fb3BzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5v ZGUucmVhZE1ldGFkYXRhT3BfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5yZWFkTWV0YWRhdGFPcF9u dW1fb3BzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUucmVhZHNfZnJvbV9sb2NhbF9jbGllbnQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9k ZS5yZWFkc19mcm9tX3JlbW90ZV9jbGllbnQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5yZXBsYWNlQmxvY2tPcF9h dmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLnJlcGxhY2VCbG9ja09wX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9k ZS53cml0ZUJsb2NrT3BfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS53cml0ZUJsb2NrT3BfbnVtX29w cw0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLndyaXRlc19mcm9tX2xvY2FsX2NsaWVudA0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLndy aXRlc19mcm9tX3JlbW90ZV9jbGllbnQNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5BZGRCbG9ja09wcw0KZGZzLm5h bWVub2RlLkNyZWF0ZUZpbGVPcHMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5EZWxldGVGaWxlT3BzDQpkZnMubmFt ZW5vZGUuRmlsZUluZm9PcHMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5GaWxlc0FwcGVuZGVkDQpkZnMubmFtZW5v ZGUuRmlsZXNDcmVhdGVkDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuRmlsZXNSZW5hbWVkDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUu R2V0QmxvY2tMb2NhdGlvbnMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5HZXRMaXN0aW5nT3BzDQpkZnMubmFtZW5v ZGUuSm91cm5hbFRyYW5zYWN0aW9uc0JhdGNoZWRJblN5bmMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5TYWZlbW9k ZVRpbWUNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5TeW5jc19hdmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLlN5bmNzX251 bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5UcmFuc2FjdGlvbnNfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5U cmFuc2FjdGlvbnNfbnVtX29wcw0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLmJsb2NrUmVwb3J0X2F2Z190aW1lDQpk ZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuYmxvY2tSZXBvcnRfbnVtX29wcw0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLmZzSW1hZ2VMb2Fk VGltZQ0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MuZ2NDb3VudA0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MuZ2NUaW1lTWlsbGlzDQpqdm0u bWV0cmljcy5sb2dFcnJvcg0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MubG9nRmF0YWwNCmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLmxvZ0lu Zm8NCmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLmxvZ1dhcm4NCmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLm1heE1lbW9yeU0NCmp2bS5tZXRy aWNzLm1lbUhlYXBDb21taXR0ZWRNDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5tZW1IZWFwVXNlZE0NCmp2bS5tZXRy aWNzLm1lbU5vbkhlYXBDb21taXR0ZWRNDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5tZW1Ob25IZWFwVXNlZE0NCmp2 bS5tZXRyaWNzLnRocmVhZHNCbG9ja2VkDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy50aHJlYWRzTmV3DQpqdm0ubWV0 cmljcy50aHJlYWRzUnVubmFibGUNCmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLnRocmVhZHNUZXJtaW5hdGVkDQpqdm0u bWV0cmljcy50aHJlYWRzVGltZWRXYWl0aW5nDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy50aHJlYWRzV2FpdGluZw0K cnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuTnVtT3BlbkNvbm5lY3Rpb25zDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5ScGNQcm9jZXNzaW5n VGltZV9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuUnBjUHJvY2Vzc2luZ1RpbWVfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBj Lm1ldHJpY3MuUnBjUXVldWVUaW1lX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5ScGNRdWV1ZVRpbWVf bnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuYWJhbmRvbkJsb2NrX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5h YmFuZG9uQmxvY2tfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuYWRkQmxvY2tfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5t ZXRyaWNzLmFkZEJsb2NrX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmJsb2NrUmVjZWl2ZWRfYXZnX3Rp bWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmJsb2NrUmVjZWl2ZWRfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuYmxvY2tS ZXBvcnRfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmJsb2NrUmVwb3J0X251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRy aWNzLmNhbGxRdWV1ZUxlbg0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuY29tcGxldGVfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRy aWNzLmNvbXBsZXRlX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmNyZWF0ZV9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1l dHJpY3MuY3JlYXRlX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmdldEVkaXRMb2dTaXplX2F2Z190aW1l DQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5nZXRFZGl0TG9nU2l6ZV9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5nZXRQcm90 b2NvbFZlcnNpb25fYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmdldFByb3RvY29sVmVyc2lvbl9udW1f b3BzDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5yZWdpc3Rlcl9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVnaXN0ZXJf bnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVuYW1lX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5yZW5hbWVf bnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVuZXdMZWFzZV9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVu ZXdMZWFzZV9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5yb2xsRWRpdExvZ19hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1l dHJpY3Mucm9sbEVkaXRMb2dfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3Mucm9sbEZzSW1hZ2VfYXZnX3Rp bWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJvbGxGc0ltYWdlX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnNlbmRIZWFy dGJlYXRfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnNlbmRIZWFydGJlYXRfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1l dHJpY3MudmVyc2lvblJlcXVlc3RfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnZlcnNpb25SZXF1ZXN0 X251bV9vcHMNCg0KLUpvbmF0aGFuDQoNCk9uIE5vdiA4LCAyMDEwLCBhdCA4OjM0IEFNLCBTaHVq YSBSZWhtYW4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4gSGkNCj4gSSBoYXZlIGNsdXN0ZXIgb2YgNCBtYWNoaW5lcyBh bmQgd2FudCB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgZ2FuZ2xpYSBmb3IgbW9uaXRvcmluZw0KPiBwdXJwb3NlLiBJ IGhhdmUgcmVhZCB0aGUgd2lraSBhbmQgYWRkIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgbGluZXMgdG8NCj4gaGFk b29wLW1ldHJpY3MucHJvcGVydGllcyBvbiBlYWNoIG1hY2hpbmUuDQo+IA0KPiBkZnMuY2xhc3M9 b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+IGRmcy5w ZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4gZGZzLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBtYXByZWQuY2xh c3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0DQo+IG1h cHJlZC5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4gbWFwcmVkLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBq dm0uY2xhc3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0 DQo+IGp2bS5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4ganZtLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiBy cGMuY2xhc3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFDb250ZXh0 DQo+IHJwYy5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCj4gcnBjLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQo+IA0KPiAN Cj4gd2hlcmUgMTAuMTAuMTAuMiBpcyB0aGUgbWFjaGluZSB3aGVyZSBpIGFtIHJ1bm5pbmcgZ21l YXRlZCBhbmQgd2ViIGZyb250DQo+IGVuZC4gV2lsbCAgSSBuZWVkIHRvIHNhbWUgaXAgaW4gYWxs IG1hY2hpbmUgYXMgaSBkbyBoZXJlIG9yIG5lZWQgdG8gZ2l2ZQ0KPiBtYWNoaW5lIG93biBpcCBp biBlYWNoIGZpbGU/IGFuZCBpcyB0aGVyZSBhbnl0aGluZyBtb3JlIHRvIGRvIHRvIHNldHVwIGl0 DQo+IHdpdGggaGFkb29wPw0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAtLSANCj4gUmVnYXJkcw0KPiBTaHVqYS11 ci1SZWhtYW4gQmFpZw0KPiA8aHR0cDovL3BrLmxpbmtlZGluLmNvbS9pbi9zaHVqYW11Z2hhbD4N Cg0K From general-return-2348-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 16:39:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22917 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 16:39:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 16:39:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 41124 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 16:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41072 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 16:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41055 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 16:39:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:39:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:39:27 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2572221wyf.35 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:39:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+qnQlVqqr2//8dPAxQztQdlkvOcUIcXmOGDXAPVxAl0=; b=VerCSdWq74Y/wGK3VvbE6JfX+GmdY+sFXpDi3AhjLYAWO1FAc8HzgbfQgadrLgmCh8 CJ+oYuCrJxlhzcMHg1HzmCPbSMNOotsu7Px1R2YA+gYK41nxzzRD50mzmFqow6fS+uAW G9tIxO6Em8mXRz6CcMKlVvfM2xE3KEIlnGfCw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GwbAP64fTv0rd91U5/CYL//YMp98Ft86JUwxORRICetYgZ5vF+m2vGhSsmIm9yTHkA 8Ir3hWKoAzIyzTkANBfOaRjlsm6YPQ7qbil/XObRY225ZbSBsIkCIDPA5hGx4TuNMbyk BPn5KzLnqVxQ4TvOBQOBa+mTBU2T55OAPOlC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.134.206 with SMTP id k14mr5498033wbt.160.1289234344281; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:39:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.86.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:39:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:39:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Two Talks by Jeff Hammerbacher on Nov. 11th at Orbitz Worldwide HQ in Chicago From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636831b201f959d04948d4302 --001636831b201f959d04948d4302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Orbitz is pleased to welcome Jeff Hammerbacher, Vice President, Products at Cloudera Inc. for two talks at Orbitz Worldwide headquarters in Chicago on Thursday, November 11th. Both talks are open to the public: At 11:30 Jeff will speak on "Experiences Evolving a New Analytical Platform" as part of the Orbitz IDEAS series. RSVP here: http:/... /www.meetup.com/orbitzideas/calendar/15258988 In the evening Jeff will be speaking to the Chicago Hadoop User Group. RSVP for the meeting here: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoo p-User-Group-CHUG/calendar/15203244/ Thanks! Hope t see you there. Jonathan --001636831b201f959d04948d4302-- From general-return-2349-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 18:40:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95682 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 18:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 18:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 67313 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 18:40:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67225 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 18:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67211 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 18:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shujamughal@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:40:38 +0000 Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so4189267yxn.35 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:40:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fgpaQZV6HVjOMDNiR+huQPaAzCaeYKzQjGMV8BcQdbY=; b=kx57pzVN8zB615+5RUAy0op/Jzdy06q50iN6Rr4zgRvQGX2ZNcnmHusceFDd9d2/nM 1enI1gCqyUSroWoDPS7HahdvKSq8hsLwXENwTQCIb0qbEutxaU7PBG4Ro/xYbjAIHjtY q3zdFORsuZ2stsYwBXzweDbx3XoRPenCQdgPc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QliA1BQszD0PizE7RWEyxzO8URaEALZW9s+Z1jDJ7sJqmMOx2yt249ZpfWBPBGNqlK RcLecdzLzgj63e1p4z26BKNGAtSLzc70PMYOlRfDL/EYSUgUwv4GZTTn+MHHphwD+IWT mF9MiYZ6fDfPuSEYupGoK98U0PP0pmrW/ZExo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.131 with SMTP id 3mr371827wex.92.1289241615528; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:40:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.10.69 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:40:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8280F561-1AE3-459E-8A94-C20B4CDD739A@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:40:14 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop From: Shuja Rehman To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7d9985f67e04948ef40f --0016364c7d9985f67e04948ef40f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi I have follow the article, i have one confusion do i need to change gmond.config file on each node?? host { location = "unspecified" } /* Feel free to specify as many udp_send_channels as you like. Gmond used to only support having a single channel */ udp_send_channel { mcast_join = 239.2.11.71 port = 8649 ttl = 1 } /* You can specify as many udp_recv_channels as you like as well. */ udp_recv_channel { mcast_join = 239.2.11.71 port = 8649 bind = 239.2.11.71 } /* You can specify as many tcp_accept_channels as you like to share an xml description of the state of the cluster */ tcp_accept_channel { port = 8649 } and i need to replace the 239.2.11.71 with that specific machine ip e.g 10.10.10.2 in 1st machine case and 10.10.10.3 for 2nd machine and so on? On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Abhinay Mehta wrote: > Me and a colleague of mine (Ryan Greenhall) setup Ganglia on our hadoop > cluster, he has written a summary of what we did to get it to work, you > might find it useful: > > http://forwardtechnology.co.uk/blog/4cc841609f4e6a021100004f > > Regards, > Abhinay Mehta > > > On 8 November 2010 15:31, Jonathan Creasy >wrote: > > > This is the correct configuration, and there should be nothing more > needed. > > I don't think that these configuration changes will take affect on the > fly > > so you would need to restart the datanode and namenode processes if I > > understand correctly. > > > > When you browse your you will see some more metrics: > > > > dfs.FSDirectory.files_deleted > > dfs.FSNamesystem.BlockCapacity > > dfs.FSNamesystem.BlocksTotal > > dfs.FSNamesystem.CapacityRemainingGB > > dfs.FSNamesystem.CapacityTotalGB > > dfs.FSNamesystem.CapacityUsedGB > > dfs.FSNamesystem.CorruptBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.ExcessBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.FilesTotal > > dfs.FSNamesystem.MissingBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.PendingDeletionBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.PendingReplicationBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.ScheduledReplicationBlocks > > dfs.FSNamesystem.TotalLoad > > dfs.FSNamesystem.UnderReplicatedBlocks > > dfs.datanode.blockChecksumOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.blockChecksumOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.blockReports_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.blockReports_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.block_verification_failures > > dfs.datanode.blocks_read > > dfs.datanode.blocks_removed > > dfs.datanode.blocks_replicated > > dfs.datanode.blocks_verified > > dfs.datanode.blocks_written > > dfs.datanode.bytes_read > > dfs.datanode.bytes_written > > dfs.datanode.copyBlockOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.copyBlockOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.heartBeats_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.heartBeats_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.readBlockOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.readBlockOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.readMetadataOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.readMetadataOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.reads_from_local_client > > dfs.datanode.reads_from_remote_client > > dfs.datanode.replaceBlockOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.replaceBlockOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.writeBlockOp_avg_time > > dfs.datanode.writeBlockOp_num_ops > > dfs.datanode.writes_from_local_client > > dfs.datanode.writes_from_remote_client > > dfs.namenode.AddBlockOps > > dfs.namenode.CreateFileOps > > dfs.namenode.DeleteFileOps > > dfs.namenode.FileInfoOps > > dfs.namenode.FilesAppended > > dfs.namenode.FilesCreated > > dfs.namenode.FilesRenamed > > dfs.namenode.GetBlockLocations > > dfs.namenode.GetListingOps > > dfs.namenode.JournalTransactionsBatchedInSync > > dfs.namenode.SafemodeTime > > dfs.namenode.Syncs_avg_time > > dfs.namenode.Syncs_num_ops > > dfs.namenode.Transactions_avg_time > > dfs.namenode.Transactions_num_ops > > dfs.namenode.blockReport_avg_time > > dfs.namenode.blockReport_num_ops > > dfs.namenode.fsImageLoadTime > > jvm.metrics.gcCount > > jvm.metrics.gcTimeMillis > > jvm.metrics.logError > > jvm.metrics.logFatal > > jvm.metrics.logInfo > > jvm.metrics.logWarn > > jvm.metrics.maxMemoryM > > jvm.metrics.memHeapCommittedM > > jvm.metrics.memHeapUsedM > > jvm.metrics.memNonHeapCommittedM > > jvm.metrics.memNonHeapUsedM > > jvm.metrics.threadsBlocked > > jvm.metrics.threadsNew > > jvm.metrics.threadsRunnable > > jvm.metrics.threadsTerminated > > jvm.metrics.threadsTimedWaiting > > jvm.metrics.threadsWaiting > > rpc.metrics.NumOpenConnections > > rpc.metrics.RpcProcessingTime_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.RpcProcessingTime_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.RpcQueueTime_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.RpcQueueTime_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.abandonBlock_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.abandonBlock_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.addBlock_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.addBlock_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.blockReceived_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.blockReceived_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.blockReport_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.blockReport_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.callQueueLen > > rpc.metrics.complete_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.complete_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.create_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.create_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.getEditLogSize_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.getEditLogSize_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.getProtocolVersion_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.getProtocolVersion_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.register_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.register_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.rename_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.rename_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.renewLease_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.renewLease_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.rollEditLog_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.rollEditLog_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.rollFsImage_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.rollFsImage_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.sendHeartbeat_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.sendHeartbeat_num_ops > > rpc.metrics.versionRequest_avg_time > > rpc.metrics.versionRequest_num_ops > > > > -Jonathan > > > > On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Shuja Rehman wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > I have cluster of 4 machines and want to configure ganglia for > monitoring > > > purpose. I have read the wiki and add the following lines to > > > hadoop-metrics.properties on each machine. > > > > > > dfs.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > > > dfs.period=10 > > > dfs.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 > > > > > > mapred.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > > > mapred.period=10 > > > mapred.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 > > > > > > jvm.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > > > jvm.period=10 > > > jvm.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 > > > > > > rpc.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > > > rpc.period=10 > > > rpc.servers=10.10.10.2:8649 > > > > > > > > > where 10.10.10.2 is the machine where i am running gmeated and web > front > > > end. Will I need to same ip in all machine as i do here or need to > give > > > machine own ip in each file? and is there anything more to do to setup > it > > > with hadoop? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards > > > Shuja-ur-Rehman Baig > > > > > > > > -- Regards Shuja-ur-Rehman Baig --0016364c7d9985f67e04948ef40f-- From general-return-2350-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 18:51:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99465 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 18:51:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 18:51:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 82620 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 18:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82546 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 18:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82532 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 18:52:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 65.55.88.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:52:08 +0000 Received: from mail173-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.244) by TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.9.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:51:46 +0000 Received: from mail173-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail173-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11F818B82F7; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:51:45 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -20 X-BigFish: VPS-20(zz1454K9370J98dN168aJ9371Pzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2ei2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB010.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail173-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail173-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 128924230476465_10326; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.241]) by mail173-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8D920804F; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB010.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.9.99.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:51:42 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.17]) by VA3DIAHUB010.RED001.local ([10.32.16.181]) with mapi; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:51:34 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:51:28 -0800 Subject: Re: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Topic: Configure Ganglia with Hadoop Thread-Index: Act/dfY/NgyQBBsyQDuBHaVYFjXn5A== Message-ID: References: <8280F561-1AE3-459E-8A94-C20B4CDD739A@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FCFFA9CAEE3C4FA4BFEA95532F0BA3A2announcemediamicrosofto_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_FCFFA9CAEE3C4FA4BFEA95532F0BA3A2announcemediamicrosofto_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpJZiB5b3VyIG5ldHdvcmsgc3VwcG9ydHMgbXVsdGljYXN0IHRoZW4gdGhhdCBzaG91bGQgd29y ayBmaW5lLg0KDQpPdXJzPGh0dHA6Ly9ibG9nLnN0bGhhZG9vcC5vcmc+IGRvZXNuJ3Qgc28gd2Ug aGFkIHRvIHVzZSBVRFAsIHRoaXMgbWVhbnMgcHV0dGluZyB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGluIGFsbCBv ZiB0aGUgZ21vbmQuY29uZiBmaWxlcy4NCg0KdWRwX3NlbmRfY2hhbm5lbCB7DQpob3N0ID0gZ2Fu Z2xpYW5vZGUNCnBvcnQgPSA4NjAxDQp9DQoNCnVkcF9yZWN2X2NoYW5uZWwgew0KcG9ydCA9IDg2 MDENCmZhbWlseSA9IGluZXQ0DQp9DQoNCg0KT24gTm92IDgsIDIwMTAsIGF0IDEyOjQwIFBNLCBT aHVqYSBSZWhtYW4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCkhpDQpJIGhhdmUgZm9sbG93IHRoZSBhcnRpY2xlLCBpIGhh dmUgb25lIGNvbmZ1c2lvbiBkbyBpIG5lZWQgdG8gY2hhbmdlDQpnbW9uZC5jb25maWcgZmlsZSBv biBlYWNoIG5vZGU/Pw0KDQpob3N0IHsNCiBsb2NhdGlvbiA9ICJ1bnNwZWNpZmllZCINCn0NCg0K LyogRmVlbCBmcmVlIHRvIHNwZWNpZnkgYXMgbWFueSB1ZHBfc2VuZF9jaGFubmVscyBhcyB5b3Ug bGlrZS4gIEdtb25kDQogIHVzZWQgdG8gb25seSBzdXBwb3J0IGhhdmluZyBhIHNpbmdsZSBjaGFu bmVsICovDQp1ZHBfc2VuZF9jaGFubmVsIHsNCiBtY2FzdF9qb2luID0gMjM5LjIuMTEuNzENCiBw b3J0ID0gODY0OQ0KIHR0bCA9IDENCn0NCg0KLyogWW91IGNhbiBzcGVjaWZ5IGFzIG1hbnkgdWRw X3JlY3ZfY2hhbm5lbHMgYXMgeW91IGxpa2UgYXMgd2VsbC4gKi8NCnVkcF9yZWN2X2NoYW5uZWwg ew0KIG1jYXN0X2pvaW4gPSAyMzkuMi4xMS43MQ0KIHBvcnQgPSA4NjQ5DQogYmluZCA9IDIzOS4y LjExLjcxDQp9DQoNCi8qIFlvdSBjYW4gc3BlY2lmeSBhcyBtYW55IHRjcF9hY2NlcHRfY2hhbm5l bHMgYXMgeW91IGxpa2UgdG8gc2hhcmUNCiAgYW4geG1sIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBzdGF0 ZSBvZiB0aGUgY2x1c3RlciAqLw0KdGNwX2FjY2VwdF9jaGFubmVsIHsNCiBwb3J0ID0gODY0OQ0K fQ0KDQoNCmFuZCBpIG5lZWQgdG8gcmVwbGFjZSB0aGUgMjM5LjIuMTEuNzEgd2l0aCB0aGF0IHNw ZWNpZmljIG1hY2hpbmUgaXAgZS5nDQoxMC4xMC4xMC4yIGluIDFzdCBtYWNoaW5lIGNhc2UgYW5k IDEwLjEwLjEwLjMgZm9yIDJuZCBtYWNoaW5lIGFuZCBzbyBvbj8NCg0KT24gTW9uLCBOb3YgOCwg MjAxMCBhdCAxMDowNyBQTSwgQWJoaW5heSBNZWh0YSA8YWJoaW5heS5tZWh0YUBnbWFpbC5jb208 bWFpbHRvOmFiaGluYXkubWVodGFAZ21haWwuY29tPj53cm90ZToNCg0KTWUgYW5kIGEgY29sbGVh Z3VlIG9mIG1pbmUgKFJ5YW4gR3JlZW5oYWxsKSBzZXR1cCBHYW5nbGlhIG9uIG91ciBoYWRvb3AN CmNsdXN0ZXIsIGhlIGhhcyB3cml0dGVuIGEgc3VtbWFyeSBvZiB3aGF0IHdlIGRpZCB0byBnZXQg aXQgdG8gd29yaywgeW91DQptaWdodCBmaW5kIGl0IHVzZWZ1bDoNCg0KaHR0cDovL2ZvcndhcmR0 ZWNobm9sb2d5LmNvLnVrL2Jsb2cvNGNjODQxNjA5ZjRlNmEwMjExMDAwMDRmDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMs DQpBYmhpbmF5IE1laHRhDQoNCg0KT24gOCBOb3ZlbWJlciAyMDEwIDE1OjMxLCBKb25hdGhhbiBD cmVhc3kgPGpvbi5jcmVhc3lAYW5ub3VuY2VtZWRpYS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmpvbi5jcmVhc3lAYW5u b3VuY2VtZWRpYS5jb20+DQp3cm90ZToNCg0KVGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgY29ycmVjdCBjb25maWd1cmF0 aW9uLCBhbmQgdGhlcmUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIG5vdGhpbmcgbW9yZQ0KbmVlZGVkLg0KSSBkb24ndCB0 aGluayB0aGF0IHRoZXNlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gY2hhbmdlcyB3aWxsIHRha2UgYWZmZWN0IG9u IHRoZQ0KZmx5DQpzbyB5b3Ugd291bGQgbmVlZCB0byByZXN0YXJ0IHRoZSBkYXRhbm9kZSBhbmQg bmFtZW5vZGUgcHJvY2Vzc2VzIGlmIEkNCnVuZGVyc3RhbmQgY29ycmVjdGx5Lg0KDQpXaGVuIHlv dSBicm93c2UgeW91ciB5b3Ugd2lsbCBzZWUgc29tZSBtb3JlIG1ldHJpY3M6DQoNCmRmcy5GU0Rp cmVjdG9yeS5maWxlc19kZWxldGVkDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLkJsb2NrQ2FwYWNpdHkNCmRm cy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uQmxvY2tzVG90YWwNCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uQ2FwYWNpdHlSZW1h aW5pbmdHQg0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5DYXBhY2l0eVRvdGFsR0INCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0 ZW0uQ2FwYWNpdHlVc2VkR0INCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uQ29ycnVwdEJsb2Nrcw0KZGZzLkZT TmFtZXN5c3RlbS5FeGNlc3NCbG9ja3MNCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uRmlsZXNUb3RhbA0KZGZz LkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5NaXNzaW5nQmxvY2tzDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLlBlbmRpbmdEZWxl dGlvbkJsb2Nrcw0KZGZzLkZTTmFtZXN5c3RlbS5QZW5kaW5nUmVwbGljYXRpb25CbG9ja3MNCmRm cy5GU05hbWVzeXN0ZW0uU2NoZWR1bGVkUmVwbGljYXRpb25CbG9ja3MNCmRmcy5GU05hbWVzeXN0 ZW0uVG90YWxMb2FkDQpkZnMuRlNOYW1lc3lzdGVtLlVuZGVyUmVwbGljYXRlZEJsb2Nrcw0KZGZz LmRhdGFub2RlLmJsb2NrQ2hlY2tzdW1PcF9hdmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJsb2NrQ2hl Y2tzdW1PcF9udW1fb3BzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tSZXBvcnRzX2F2Z190aW1lDQpkZnMu ZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tSZXBvcnRzX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ibG9ja192ZXJpZmlj YXRpb25fZmFpbHVyZXMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ibG9ja3NfcmVhZA0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmJs b2Nrc19yZW1vdmVkDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuYmxvY2tzX3JlcGxpY2F0ZWQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9k ZS5ibG9ja3NfdmVyaWZpZWQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ibG9ja3Nfd3JpdHRlbg0KZGZzLmRhdGFu b2RlLmJ5dGVzX3JlYWQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5ieXRlc193cml0dGVuDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUu Y29weUJsb2NrT3BfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5jb3B5QmxvY2tPcF9udW1fb3BzDQpk ZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUuaGVhcnRCZWF0c19hdmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLmhlYXJ0QmVhdHNf bnVtX29wcw0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLnJlYWRCbG9ja09wX2F2Z190aW1lDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUu cmVhZEJsb2NrT3BfbnVtX29wcw0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLnJlYWRNZXRhZGF0YU9wX2F2Z190aW1l DQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUucmVhZE1ldGFkYXRhT3BfbnVtX29wcw0KZGZzLmRhdGFub2RlLnJlYWRz X2Zyb21fbG9jYWxfY2xpZW50DQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUucmVhZHNfZnJvbV9yZW1vdGVfY2xpZW50 DQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUucmVwbGFjZUJsb2NrT3BfYXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS5yZXBs YWNlQmxvY2tPcF9udW1fb3BzDQpkZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUud3JpdGVCbG9ja09wX2F2Z190aW1lDQpk ZnMuZGF0YW5vZGUud3JpdGVCbG9ja09wX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS53cml0ZXNfZnJv bV9sb2NhbF9jbGllbnQNCmRmcy5kYXRhbm9kZS53cml0ZXNfZnJvbV9yZW1vdGVfY2xpZW50DQpk ZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuQWRkQmxvY2tPcHMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5DcmVhdGVGaWxlT3BzDQpkZnMu bmFtZW5vZGUuRGVsZXRlRmlsZU9wcw0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLkZpbGVJbmZvT3BzDQpkZnMubmFt ZW5vZGUuRmlsZXNBcHBlbmRlZA0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLkZpbGVzQ3JlYXRlZA0KZGZzLm5hbWVu b2RlLkZpbGVzUmVuYW1lZA0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLkdldEJsb2NrTG9jYXRpb25zDQpkZnMubmFt ZW5vZGUuR2V0TGlzdGluZ09wcw0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLkpvdXJuYWxUcmFuc2FjdGlvbnNCYXRj aGVkSW5TeW5jDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuU2FmZW1vZGVUaW1lDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuU3luY3Nf YXZnX3RpbWUNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5TeW5jc19udW1fb3BzDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuVHJhbnNh Y3Rpb25zX2F2Z190aW1lDQpkZnMubmFtZW5vZGUuVHJhbnNhY3Rpb25zX251bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5u YW1lbm9kZS5ibG9ja1JlcG9ydF9hdmdfdGltZQ0KZGZzLm5hbWVub2RlLmJsb2NrUmVwb3J0X251 bV9vcHMNCmRmcy5uYW1lbm9kZS5mc0ltYWdlTG9hZFRpbWUNCmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLmdjQ291bnQN Cmp2bS5tZXRyaWNzLmdjVGltZU1pbGxpcw0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MubG9nRXJyb3INCmp2bS5tZXRy aWNzLmxvZ0ZhdGFsDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5sb2dJbmZvDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5sb2dXYXJuDQpq dm0ubWV0cmljcy5tYXhNZW1vcnlNDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5tZW1IZWFwQ29tbWl0dGVkTQ0KanZt Lm1ldHJpY3MubWVtSGVhcFVzZWRNDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy5tZW1Ob25IZWFwQ29tbWl0dGVkTQ0K anZtLm1ldHJpY3MubWVtTm9uSGVhcFVzZWRNDQpqdm0ubWV0cmljcy50aHJlYWRzQmxvY2tlZA0K anZtLm1ldHJpY3MudGhyZWFkc05ldw0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MudGhyZWFkc1J1bm5hYmxlDQpqdm0u bWV0cmljcy50aHJlYWRzVGVybWluYXRlZA0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MudGhyZWFkc1RpbWVkV2FpdGlu Zw0KanZtLm1ldHJpY3MudGhyZWFkc1dhaXRpbmcNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLk51bU9wZW5Db25uZWN0 aW9ucw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuUnBjUHJvY2Vzc2luZ1RpbWVfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNz LlJwY1Byb2Nlc3NpbmdUaW1lX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLlJwY1F1ZXVlVGltZV9hdmdf dGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuUnBjUXVldWVUaW1lX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmFiYW5k b25CbG9ja19hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuYWJhbmRvbkJsb2NrX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5t ZXRyaWNzLmFkZEJsb2NrX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5hZGRCbG9ja19udW1fb3BzDQpy cGMubWV0cmljcy5ibG9ja1JlY2VpdmVkX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5ibG9ja1JlY2Vp dmVkX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmJsb2NrUmVwb3J0X2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmlj cy5ibG9ja1JlcG9ydF9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5jYWxsUXVldWVMZW4NCnJwYy5tZXRy aWNzLmNvbXBsZXRlX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5jb21wbGV0ZV9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMu bWV0cmljcy5jcmVhdGVfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLmNyZWF0ZV9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMu bWV0cmljcy5nZXRFZGl0TG9nU2l6ZV9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuZ2V0RWRpdExvZ1Np emVfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MuZ2V0UHJvdG9jb2xWZXJzaW9uX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMu bWV0cmljcy5nZXRQcm90b2NvbFZlcnNpb25fbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVnaXN0ZXJf YXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJlZ2lzdGVyX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJlbmFt ZV9hdmdfdGltZQ0KcnBjLm1ldHJpY3MucmVuYW1lX251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJlbmV3 TGVhc2VfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJlbmV3TGVhc2VfbnVtX29wcw0KcnBjLm1ldHJp Y3Mucm9sbEVkaXRMb2dfYXZnX3RpbWUNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJvbGxFZGl0TG9nX251bV9vcHMN CnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnJvbGxGc0ltYWdlX2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5yb2xsRnNJbWFn ZV9udW1fb3BzDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy5zZW5kSGVhcnRiZWF0X2F2Z190aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmlj cy5zZW5kSGVhcnRiZWF0X251bV9vcHMNCnJwYy5tZXRyaWNzLnZlcnNpb25SZXF1ZXN0X2F2Z190 aW1lDQpycGMubWV0cmljcy52ZXJzaW9uUmVxdWVzdF9udW1fb3BzDQoNCi1Kb25hdGhhbg0KDQpP biBOb3YgOCwgMjAxMCwgYXQgODozNCBBTSwgU2h1amEgUmVobWFuIHdyb3RlOg0KDQpIaQ0KSSBo YXZlIGNsdXN0ZXIgb2YgNCBtYWNoaW5lcyBhbmQgd2FudCB0byBjb25maWd1cmUgZ2FuZ2xpYSBm b3INCm1vbml0b3JpbmcNCnB1cnBvc2UuIEkgaGF2ZSByZWFkIHRoZSB3aWtpIGFuZCBhZGQgdGhl IGZvbGxvd2luZyBsaW5lcyB0bw0KaGFkb29wLW1ldHJpY3MucHJvcGVydGllcyBvbiBlYWNoIG1h Y2hpbmUuDQoNCmRmcy5jbGFzcz1vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2Fu Z2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCmRmcy5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCmRmcy5zZXJ2ZXJzPTEwLjEwLjEwLjI6ODY0OQ0K DQptYXByZWQuY2xhc3M9b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AubWV0cmljcy5nYW5nbGlhLkdhbmdsaWFD b250ZXh0DQptYXByZWQucGVyaW9kPTEwDQptYXByZWQuc2VydmVycz0xMC4xMC4xMC4yOjg2NDkN Cg0KanZtLmNsYXNzPW9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLm1ldHJpY3MuZ2FuZ2xpYS5HYW5nbGlhQ29u dGV4dA0KanZtLnBlcmlvZD0xMA0KanZtLnNlcnZlcnM9MTAuMTAuMTAuMjo4NjQ5DQoNCnJwYy5j bGFzcz1vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5tZXRyaWNzLmdhbmdsaWEuR2FuZ2xpYUNvbnRleHQNCnJw Yy5wZXJpb2Q9MTANCnJwYy5zZXJ2ZXJzPTEwLjEwLjEwLjI6ODY0OQ0KDQoNCndoZXJlIDEwLjEw LjEwLjIgaXMgdGhlIG1hY2hpbmUgd2hlcmUgaSBhbSBydW5uaW5nIGdtZWF0ZWQgYW5kIHdlYg0K ZnJvbnQNCmVuZC4gV2lsbCAgSSBuZWVkIHRvIHNhbWUgaXAgaW4gYWxsIG1hY2hpbmUgYXMgaSBk byBoZXJlIG9yIG5lZWQgdG8NCmdpdmUNCm1hY2hpbmUgb3duIGlwIGluIGVhY2ggZmlsZT8gYW5k IGlzIHRoZXJlIGFueXRoaW5nIG1vcmUgdG8gZG8gdG8gc2V0dXANCml0DQp3aXRoIGhhZG9vcD8N Cg0KDQoNCi0tDQpSZWdhcmRzDQpTaHVqYS11ci1SZWhtYW4gQmFpZw0KPGh0dHA6Ly9way5saW5r ZWRpbi5jb20vaW4vc2h1amFtdWdoYWw+DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQotLQ0KUmVnYXJkcw0KU2h1amEt dXItUmVobWFuIEJhaWcNCjxodHRwOi8vcGsubGlua2VkaW4uY29tL2luL3NodWphbXVnaGFsPg0K DQo= --_000_FCFFA9CAEE3C4FA4BFEA95532F0BA3A2announcemediamicrosofto_-- From general-return-2351-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 08 19:34:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21401 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 19:34:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 19:34:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 39457 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 19:34:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39401 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 19:34:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39393 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 19:34:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:34:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:34:43 +0000 Received: by ywp4 with SMTP id 4so4236052ywp.35 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:34:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MK8B+/V6c3Agv4qFZYedjUXLG0/8c/bA/pUDrkxiYqE=; b=peWnjCvedvWXvPoo+PsDGkdT2l1WpBtxTsrMohvz1e3D3fZU2oS4JJFrpPtm4ctc11 iD1JU5xtPcRte936iQ3/IVv2K/EJA+oKYnN2X+vT/JX5l3A5NTeJ76xafSIvPS8xlAaD GVpTMMHKnoPwqFH6lUoFDxVPFsMM9tCNUxAzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ql/Xw2IcC0dXpSXIBUvp6pYYy8FhKXye4jbpgMbi/qdviAEKyyLSYwGjO6UwU44C1P Bz5s5umrL2jtZ1Ji7zC9fkUj/DDTwoLkwvQw9Pl68BARmKP3S4ILvrPR/Va+ZRCIumlR 315Q0jVAEBG5wg4UhEj/4tgz4UhP8kUv4E/l4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.30.2 with SMTP id j2mr7585577wea.33.1289244861916; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:34:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.86.9 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:34:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:34:21 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Two Talks by Jeff Hammerbacher on Nov. 11th at Orbitz Worldwide HQ in Chicago From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8e7605e47c04948fb6d6 --0016e6dd8e7605e47c04948fb6d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here's a correct URL for the IDEAS talk: http://www.meetup.com/orbitzideas/calendar/15258988/ On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Jonathan Seidman < jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > Orbitz is pleased to welcome Jeff Hammerbacher, Vice President, Products at > Cloudera Inc. for two talks at Orbitz Worldwide headquarters in Chicago on > Thursday, November 11th. Both talks are open to the public: > > At 11:30 Jeff will speak on "Experiences Evolving a New Analytical > Platform" as part of the Orbitz IDEAS series. RSVP here: http:/... > /www.meetup.com/orbitzideas/calendar/15258988 > > In the evening Jeff will be speaking to the Chicago Hadoop User Group. RSVP > for the meeting here: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoo > p-User-Group-CHUG/calendar/15203244/ > > Thanks! Hope t see you there. > > Jonathan > --0016e6dd8e7605e47c04948fb6d6-- From general-return-2352-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 03:12:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51506 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 03:12:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 03:12:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 18555 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 03:13:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18400 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 03:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18391 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 03:12:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:12:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:12:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 51084 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 03:12:02 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:12:02 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so830355bwz.35 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:12:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.53.9 with SMTP id k9mr5862231bkg.102.1289272352086; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.29.18 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:12:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:12:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Making release branch for 0.22 From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d9ff9099250494961ca5 --00504502d9ff9099250494961ca5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All, I plan on making the release branch for 0.22 next week (11/15). After that point, only critical bug fixes or jiras that I've approved as release manager can be applied to it. -- Owen --00504502d9ff9099250494961ca5-- From general-return-2353-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 12:39:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6785 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 12:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 12:39:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 39707 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39367 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:39:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39359 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 12:39:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:39:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:39:48 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4952022fxm.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:39:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RZGN16Of/xTROtLZ3DzniXcXRV5oidUFBoFznfs3XFo=; b=v0KaMCojwZSI2+tyVJmjeJfRs/FVTVZ9v5AMFzDLnrAjL+czYFOe2lpUVkH4poATl2 U4GRGhMCvum4MQAHFTViJ9L9GTI0vV1vL1TGRa1iClVsaJWll+XmozdO7EYibDQNQ8os eFiP1qHtiCpi36vQs5aJD6pUyiNu4Fsf3qUDo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cK5WhvU9GJZHjS4qsshIOrlzRrg/Z/VAzpMF2JG66WP7XUTt6kdGdQv/ZHApu7vVuR 3ie67E5u4Ig3PNFABcFKgoYXCvoJxTXxTAsGKy9v1b8L3wJCjcJNn4SkdNog/l+fVlAj D5tvNz7ildP7JYqn314c3k7pl1wGXmYXJTr44= Received: by 10.223.97.75 with SMTP id k11mr4997909fan.85.1289306367823; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.69] ([195.88.186.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z2sm621042fam.15.2010.11.09.04.39.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:39:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:39:24 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I have a problem with my tmp dir. Right now it exceeded 4TB on every of my 4 machines, so it has 16TB in total. I'm running out of space on servers, so I would like to know if it is safe to clean this directory completly, or if there is configuration option that would do this for me. Any help will be appreciated. -- Wojciech Langiewicz From general-return-2354-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 13:46:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40178 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 13:46:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 13:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 43061 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 13:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42862 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 13:47:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42854 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 13:47:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:47:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:47:17 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oA9DJX8h007429 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:19:33 -0600 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 75EC842E8960 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:46:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id tLEoUbd6F3F8LG2l for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:46:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id oA9Dkutf003380 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:46:56 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:45:30 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:46:55 -0600 Subject: RE: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Topic: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Index: AcuACzs3ZPjZt1pHSqWS0qHcCQR4wQACSzuA Message-ID: References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Assuming you didn't change anything with the job history and you don't have jobs that run for more than 24 hours... You should be able to remove anything that hasn't been touched for the past 24 hours. So you could create a cron job to remove the files. HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Wojciech Langiewicz [mailto:wlangiewicz@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:39 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Hello, I have a problem with my tmp dir. Right now it exceeded 4TB on every of my 4 machines, so it has 16TB in total. I'm running out of space on servers, so I would like to know if it is safe to clean this directory completly, or if there is configuration option that would do this for me. Any help will be appreciated. -- Wojciech Langiewicz The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2355-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 14:04:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46292 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 14:04:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 14:04:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 75239 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74760 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74752 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:04:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:04:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:04:24 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so5026285fxm.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:04:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q9C3xUcnGynskZ9HODC4W/mtUVO3qs0rwQyx8GlxEik=; b=jly4ymq5eWOIwLAh6ALmuaCyMrUl99nx/giA/sRuH+mcxX9NB1O417aZVIxkXzGg47 VAx28Z90vnDxPkte84xUyvN4PVJ0srdnkHPUrFDjU74xqgpQQnR8cb3gpn4500mReDDc DbgxBY9JuY6OcaaBG55ROC0dhTGqQw4L+vtOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NtIFeITOsRFEe4yMvJtwmnUU5orxnm8S8DtRf/RPYwz/Q11W+iGpbTkveSrr6vlbha Kaj/8bBT80rL99yFTqcqR2HRJEsp1zBDi1+iik6pD0sFgYkmsj+3tx3QLWmrGHl5XTEB rIy0CrHzm3Ok67w5ixk1EQEuxUdAV0FEoZk/c= Received: by 10.223.116.9 with SMTP id k9mr5076986faq.124.1289311444273; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.19.30.231] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm677641fal.0.2010.11.09.06.04.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:04:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:04:01 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the answer, but what about HDFS data? In tmp dir I have another 2: dfs and mapred Directory 'dfs' seems to contain block from the HDFS, is it safe to delete them? W dniu 09.11.2010 14:46, Segel, Mike wrote: > Assuming you didn't change anything with the job history and you don't have jobs that run for more than 24 hours... > You should be able to remove anything that hasn't been touched for the past 24 hours. > > So you could create a cron job to remove the files. > > HTH > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wojciech Langiewicz [mailto:wlangiewicz@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:39 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? > > Hello, > I have a problem with my tmp dir. Right now it exceeded 4TB on every of > my 4 machines, so it has 16TB in total. > > I'm running out of space on servers, so I would like to know if it is > safe to clean this directory completly, or if there is configuration > option that would do this for me. > > Any help will be appreciated. > > -- > Wojciech Langiewicz > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2356-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 14:19:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60045 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 14:19:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 14:19:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 10477 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:19:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10195 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10186 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:19:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:19:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:19:24 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so5041277fxm.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:19:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=dpyoWLHP6d9V2gM1etzoyBSOtmRrrAPdI5P3qiaP2xU=; b=gd6kphVoW7/x5ftujUClTPQLBlMJA5xIXld1ema+U3xS4FL6o2KF3Q/XkumyXkozZT pdsXf8JmL5hcGPt2CtyIHRDsi6+w9Z2DZWCqAtLogvuPMZAACyoOc5UCZ2Y/TBr/pvle oMS6Y1NTJ+vEcn91kxhiwO82/+8iiOkfAtGf4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=rFX6Pc+QNLGK1lSQHK1FBHdWifUyRvf2LYtR+TsKSE3BWjMEkmPuQzj8lCy4Aqke8b 8vWwzGZNIA2Z9drLHlg7dg+GffOcKj7xPl0EVNQ/Eqa6lxm2/4cNzsD6tfg7Wc7IXlLw UZLqNFuT7780zJUEOKrIVU3gYUIdVwLiYxJDw= Received: by 10.223.89.142 with SMTP id e14mr5141362fam.143.1289312344010; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:19:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 06:18:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:48:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey, On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Thanks for the answer, but what about HDFS data? > > In tmp dir I have another 2: dfs and mapred > Directory 'dfs' seems to contain block from the HDFS, is it safe to delete > them? > NO! You'll lose your blocks if you delete that dfs/data directory (If it is in use and I suppose that's what is taking up much space). In production, the dfs.data.dir property should not point any of its directories to a /tmp subdir which may be wiped upon boot. -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2357-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 14:19:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60273 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 14:19:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 14:19:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11946 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11862 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11854 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:20:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:20:08 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oA9DqOHn008471 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:52:24 -0600 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C252A42E93B8 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:19:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id a6NFXDDLrlO1S3Sv for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:19:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id oA9EJktf009504 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:19:46 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:19:46 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:19:45 -0600 Subject: RE: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Topic: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Index: AcuAFw1LJTOHPxDVRKaiceCvpsk7VwAAJ7IA Message-ID: References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 SSdtIG5vdCBzdXJlIGlmIHlvdSBtZWFudCBzb21ldGhpbmcgb24gdGhlIGhhZG9vcCBIREZTLCBv ciBzb21ldGhpbmcgaW4gdGhlIHVuaXggL3RtcCBkaXJlY3RvcnkgdGhhdOKAmXMgaW4gYSBzdWJk aXJlY3RvcnkuDQoNCkFnYWluLCB0aGUgZ2VuZXJhbCBydWxlIG9mIHRodW1iIGlzIHRoYXQgaWYg YSBmaWxlIGhhc24ndCBiZWVuIHRvdWNoZWQgb3IgYWNjZXNzZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBwYXN0IDI0IGhv dXJzLCBpdCBzaG91bGQgYmUgb2sgdG8gZGVsZXRlLg0KTm90ZTogSWYgeW91J3JlIHBhcmFub2lk IGFuZCB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhIGxvdCBvZiBmaWxlcyB0aGF0IGFyZSBtdWNoIG9sZGVyLCB5b3UgbWF5 IHdhbnQgdG8gY29uc2lkZXIgZGVsZXRpbmcgYW55dGhpbmcgdGhhdCBoYXNuJ3QgYmVlbiB0b3Vj aGVkIGluIHRoZSBwYXN0IHdlZWsuIEFuZCBieSB0b3VjaGVkLCBJIG1lYW4gbGFzdCBhY2Nlc3Mg dGltZSwgbm90IGxhc3QgbW9kaWZpZWQgdGltZS4NCg0KSFRIDQoNCi1NaWtlDQoNCg0KLS0tLS1P cmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IFdvamNpZWNoIExhbmdpZXdpY3ogW21haWx0bzp3 bGFuZ2lld2ljekBnbWFpbC5jb21dIA0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMDksIDIwMTAg ODowNCBBTQ0KVG86IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBjbGVh bmluZyB1cCAnaGFkb29wLnRtcC5kaXInID8NCg0KVGhhbmtzIGZvciB0aGUgYW5zd2VyLCBidXQg d2hhdCBhYm91dCBIREZTIGRhdGE/DQoNCkluIHRtcCBkaXIgSSBoYXZlIGFub3RoZXIgMjogZGZz IGFuZCBtYXByZWQNCkRpcmVjdG9yeSAnZGZzJyBzZWVtcyB0byBjb250YWluIGJsb2NrIGZyb20g dGhlIEhERlMsIGlzIGl0IHNhZmUgdG8gDQpkZWxldGUgdGhlbT8NCg0KVyBkbml1IDA5LjExLjIw MTAgMTQ6NDYsIFNlZ2VsLCBNaWtlIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBBc3N1bWluZyB5b3UgZGlkbid0IGNoYW5n ZSBhbnl0aGluZyB3aXRoIHRoZSBqb2IgaGlzdG9yeSBhbmQgeW91IGRvbid0IGhhdmUgam9icyB0 aGF0IHJ1biBmb3IgbW9yZSB0aGFuIDI0IGhvdXJzLi4uDQo+IFlvdSBzaG91bGQgYmUgYWJsZSB0 byByZW1vdmUgYW55dGhpbmcgdGhhdCBoYXNuJ3QgYmVlbiB0b3VjaGVkIGZvciB0aGUgcGFzdCAy NCBob3Vycy4NCj4NCj4gU28geW91IGNvdWxkIGNyZWF0ZSBhIGNyb24gam9iIHRvIHJlbW92ZSB0 aGUgZmlsZXMuDQo+DQo+IEhUSA0KPg0KPiAtTWlrZQ0KPg0KPg0KPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1l c3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBXb2pjaWVjaCBMYW5naWV3aWN6IFttYWlsdG86d2xhbmdpZXdp Y3pAZ21haWwuY29tXQ0KPiBTZW50OiBUdWVzZGF5LCBOb3ZlbWJlciAwOSwgMjAxMCA2OjM5IEFN DQo+IFRvOiBnZW5lcmFsQGhhZG9vcC5hcGFjaGUub3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IGNsZWFuaW5nIHVw ICdoYWRvb3AudG1wLmRpcicgPw0KPg0KPiBIZWxsbywNCj4gSSBoYXZlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSB3aXRo IG15IHRtcCBkaXIuIFJpZ2h0IG5vdyBpdCBleGNlZWRlZCA0VEIgb24gZXZlcnkgb2YNCj4gbXkg NCBtYWNoaW5lcywgc28gaXQgaGFzIDE2VEIgaW4gdG90YWwuDQo+DQo+IEknbSBydW5uaW5nIG91 dCBvZiBzcGFjZSBvbiBzZXJ2ZXJzLCBzbyBJIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBpZiBpdCBpcw0K PiBzYWZlIHRvIGNsZWFuIHRoaXMgZGlyZWN0b3J5IGNvbXBsZXRseSwgb3IgaWYgdGhlcmUgaXMg Y29uZmlndXJhdGlvbg0KPiBvcHRpb24gdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBkbyB0aGlzIGZvciBtZS4NCj4NCj4g QW55IGhlbHAgd2lsbCBiZSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZC4NCj4NCj4gLS0NCj4gV29qY2llY2ggTGFuZ2ll d2ljeg0KPg0KPg0KPiBUaGUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY29udGFpbmVkIGluIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNh dGlvbiBtYXkgYmUgQ09ORklERU5USUFMIGFuZCBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgdXNl IG9mIHRoZSByZWNpcGllbnQocykgbmFtZWQgYWJvdmUuICBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50 ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LCB5b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBub3RpZmllZCB0aGF0IGFueSBkaXNzZW1p bmF0aW9uLCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24sIG9yIGNvcHlpbmcgb2YgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uLCBv ciBhbnkgb2YgaXRzIGNvbnRlbnRzLCBpcyBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9oaWJpdGVkLiAgSWYgeW91IGhh dmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRo ZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZS9kZXN0cm95IHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBhbnkg Y29weSBvZiBpdCBmcm9tIHlvdXIgY29tcHV0ZXIgb3IgcGFwZXIgZmlsZXMuDQoNCg0KDQpUaGUg aW5mb3JtYXRpb24gY29udGFpbmVkIGluIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBtYXkgYmUgQ09ORklE RU5USUFMIGFuZCBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWNpcGllbnQo cykgbmFtZWQgYWJvdmUuICBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50LCB5 b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBub3RpZmllZCB0aGF0IGFueSBkaXNzZW1pbmF0aW9uLCBkaXN0cmlidXRp b24sIG9yIGNvcHlpbmcgb2YgdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uLCBvciBhbnkgb2YgaXRzIGNvbnRl bnRzLCBpcyBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9oaWJpdGVkLiAgSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBj b21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgYW5kIGRlbGV0 ZS9kZXN0cm95IHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIGFuZCBhbnkgY29weSBvZiBpdCBmcm9tIHlv dXIgY29tcHV0ZXIgb3IgcGFwZXIgZmlsZXMuDQo= From general-return-2358-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 14:21:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60807 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 14:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 14:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17623 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17523 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17515 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:22:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:22:04 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oA9DsK2L008521 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:54:20 -0600 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id AEC2942E946C for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:21:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id Zlih37dckpcsEXCg for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:21:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id oA9ELgtf009779 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:21:42 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:21:42 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:21:41 -0600 Subject: RE: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Topic: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Thread-Index: AcuAGSUSA/aN7Y3MQDWfsU813PA66wAAA7EQ Message-ID: References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's actually a good point. I'm looking at it from the Unix admin point of view. Anything in /tmp is = just that... a temp file that you don't care about. (Although I think in Cloudera's CDH3 they store the PIDs in /tmp??? (Goin= g from memory and I'm still on my first cup of coffee.)) -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Harsh J [mailto:qwertymaniac@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:19 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? Hey, On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > Thanks for the answer, but what about HDFS data? > > In tmp dir I have another 2: dfs and mapred > Directory 'dfs' seems to contain block from the HDFS, is it safe to del= ete > them? > NO! You'll lose your blocks if you delete that dfs/data directory (If it is in use and I suppose that's what is taking up much space). In production, the dfs.data.dir property should not point any of its directories to a /tmp subdir which may be wiped upon boot. --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2359-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 14:29:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62668 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 14:29:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 14:29:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29411 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29031 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 14:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29022 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:29:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:29:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:29:49 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so5052050fxm.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:29:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s9mxAqQychn6yA7JXWzEggLZefyXSrP2c68thEJItIg=; b=NGxFJ3kGur/1P1juU6ZYdS00ixxVsm7ojw+YTsGBc1K0sslaKbGjTvddeZnCVoQ8R2 GHyTLh+IDaRnOND/BgxxUOKb7AChXdTLIUhKcyLDD+Z695se40qme9aN4NFbzve+PaK/ 1FHJRgetTr9OqeR0cPxAh0DMoPAHLna2KwMww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rnXhrY7HavSxOZ1YPV1Y1VixE5sBKpjJjL34XbuZAf9axPn6HMNU9SrnXy5rF2hTef JO9guUK4yba9F8mh052t6xmjJQ6U2uXaNf+mr2EQruEG0ulFqp7yQ3P45VSXdCyTiHtp GXyq30TJseyP7XXVSzTN/X7aHUO/hbE64gUQ8= Received: by 10.223.86.16 with SMTP id q16mr5184793fal.58.1289312968322; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:29:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.19.30.231] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y19sm690510fau.41.2010.11.09.06.29.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:29:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:29:25 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 09.11.2010 15:18, Harsh J wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Wojciech Langiewicz > wrote: >> In tmp dir I have another 2: dfs and mapred >> Directory 'dfs' seems to contain block from the HDFS, is it safe to delete >> them? >> > > NO! You'll lose your blocks if you delete that dfs/data directory (If > it is in use and I suppose that's what is taking up much space). > > In production, the dfs.data.dir property should not point any of its > directories to a /tmp subdir which may be wiped upon boot. > Thank you very much for answer, this was as I suspected. So in fact those files are real data inside HDFS ? What might be causing situation where I have about 5TB in HDFS and hadoop tmp dirs have about 16TB in total? -- Wojciech Langiewicz From general-return-2360-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 15:06:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93564 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 15:06:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 15:06:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 29608 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 15:06:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29368 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 15:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29359 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 15:06:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:06:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:06:36 +0000 Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so4945719gyf.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:06:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+H4JXcWqJcgezoJi/TTKJVPBsU/byGNdx1R4FP05cAY=; b=AKoWFJcoWn5KiIopb6IW6++euE1lEw3SnMmPE37VXW33zh+afqzBkcbLMjV4fnvBVf 5vtfLH9SvYzFbZUGRdO3BGMnPg8GdJA3SlFtD0fStWFhKHzeW3KIvjihj72lZnSlXzNs 5fies2vboB0dkGWSkVEAGruDUMkS2Mbb/zPZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=a9dUkHdqYJtHrQLyjhYal38Fj2VqeH2/28B+lJrAuYRQ6hSytxSaQQQ7K2ZWIUCbvt 6Bvfhno/QhcMGMATtVnYz0oXjseuVoqbfTjzNVmAljW0lztjazDPhq0rLl3I/zMgiq99 X5Mx7FR4qIsWljkVi0zNFsFWqFvYsvRIw+cHk= Received: by 10.204.102.76 with SMTP id f12mr6673650bko.57.1289315175607; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:06:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:05:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:35:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Segel, Mike wrote: > That's actually a good point. > > I'm looking at it from the Unix admin point of view. Anything in /tmp is just that... a temp file that you don't care about. > (Although I think in Cloudera's CDH3 they store the PIDs in /tmp??? (Going from memory and I'm still on my first cup of coffee.)) > If am right, they set hadoop.tmp.dir to /var/lib/hadoop/cache-something in their bundled configuration. This is sufficient in moving all files that otherwise would go to /tmp, as all defaults (like name dir, data dir, mapred/local, mapred/io, etc.) use ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/ as their prefix. -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2361-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 16:24:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54956 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 16:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 16:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 29317 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:24:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29233 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29219 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 16:24:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:24:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:24:35 +0000 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so4911856qwk.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:24:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.205.200 with SMTP id fr8mr5445827qab.198.1289319854616; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:24:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.114.209 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:23:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> From: Aaron Myers Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:23:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300faae5efb3b10494a12b47 --20cf300faae5efb3b10494a12b47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > > What might be causing situation where I have about 5TB in HDFS and hadoop > tmp dirs have about 16TB in total? > If indeed this is the block data of your HDFS files, then this makes perfect sense. HDFS by default replicates every block 3 times, so ~5TB used in HDFS is ~15TB raw on disk. Aaron --20cf300faae5efb3b10494a12b47-- From general-return-2362-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 16:28:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57069 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 16:28:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 16:28:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 46317 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:29:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46158 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46150 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 16:28:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:28:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wlangiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:28:52 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so5196399fxm.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:28:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3wvCa421ZThAd++csvNm4XLN+Bnc7ynPJsW4DaYloOI=; b=fB4zVGftLDFLim481Z0SQoNg+cnKDmSz8PYg14eU566LhPylOmPUgOoWFy8MVd7nCY 65Pq9Lgr8nrVOlDL5k9pBCBtJynDYQCPA6+XDhi1MTTZCw4Sz+I0BSjv+TKi0jk9Wvuz DtDr99eN+bXrI3KOlzOl7RYiX6g1BSprRjX9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FlKMXwbNIX2S7kgCL8zIfbR3npOqBRJNJGkDnHnPm6H1yuypXXORVjrLfndvo3JCZF azEe3oTc5vJeZI3LWw062baTJqVc6JiJcq31TkZj903v4Ffp8PIfhN2d7JndoA6nwiFV Xj2qi9/rYJ4h/1JSORlowU8v2aHBsBX2eSdu4= Received: by 10.223.83.133 with SMTP id f5mr5336156fal.29.1289320110659; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.19.30.231] (static.nk-net.pl [195.88.186.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm776230fal.22.2010.11.09.08.28.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:28:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD976AC.6030203@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:28:28 +0100 From: Wojciech Langiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 09.11.2010 17:23, Aaron Myers pisze: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Wojciech Langiewicz > wrote: > >> >> What might be causing situation where I have about 5TB in HDFS and hadoop >> tmp dirs have about 16TB in total? >> > > If indeed this is the block data of your HDFS files, then this makes perfect > sense. HDFS by default replicates every block 3 times, so ~5TB used in HDFS > is ~15TB raw on disk. You are right, I wonder why didn't I though about it before. Thanks for all the answers:) But name of this option 'hadoop.tmp.dir' is at least a little confusing. -- Wojciech Langiewicz From general-return-2363-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 16:48:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64639 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 16:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 16:48:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 2244 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 16:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2173 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 16:48:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:48:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,URI_OBFU_WWW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.74] (HELO mailout05.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:48:28 +0000 Received: from mailint05 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout05 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4685146834 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:48:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint05 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5D714650C for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:48:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:48:06 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB802D.E296B520" Subject: RE: web-based file transfer Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:48:07 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A15F@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F0346A15F@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> Thread-Topic: web-based file transfer Thread-Index: Act7S1n8eBK7QP69Rtiun5Wkz5WaWQE35FUV References: <033e01cb7abb$623b7d50$26b277f0$@com> <4CD148F9.8080600@apache.org> From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2010 16:48:06.0788 (UTC) FILETIME=[E23F6440:01CB802D] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB802D.E296B520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >Even all the Java servlet APIs assume that the content-length header=20 >fits into a signed 32 bit integer and gets unhappy once you go over 2GB = >(something I worry about in >http://jira.smartfrog.org/jira/browse/SFOS-1476 ) I built my HDFS webDAV implementation to reference the JackRabbit 1.6.4 = library - AFAIK it uses a long for the content-length header since = release 1.5.5, not a 32bit int: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2009 That means any large file limitations are going to be on the client = side, especially for 32bit OSs, so yes, might be worth thinking about = leveraging HAR archives to keep the file count down if you do choose to = go down the same route. R On 02/11/10 18:25, Mark Laffoon wrote: > We want to enable our web-based client (i.e. browser client, java = applet, > whatever?) to transfer files into a system backed by hdfs. The obvious > simple solution is to do http file uploads, then copy the file to = hdfs. I > was wondering if there is a way to do it with an hdfs-enabled applet = where > the server gives the client the necessary hadoop configuration > information, and the client applet pushes the data directly into hdfs. I recall some work done with webdav https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-225 -but I don't think it's progressed I've done things like this in the past with servlets and forms; the=20 webapp you deploy has the hadoop configuration (and the network rights=20 to talk to HDFS in the datacentre), the clients PUT/POST up content http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/long-haul-hadoop However, you are limited to 2GB worth of upload/download in most web=20 clients, some (chrome) go up to 4GB but you are pushing the limit there. = Even all the Java servlet APIs assume that the content-length header=20 fits into a signed 32 bit integer and gets unhappy once you go over 2GB=20 (something I worry about in=20 http://jira.smartfrog.org/jira/browse/SFOS-1476 ) Because Hadoop really likes large files -tens to hundreds of GB in a big = cluster- I don't think the current web infrastructure is up to working=20 with it. that said, looking at hudson for the nightly runs of my bulk IO tests ,=20 jetty will serve up 4GB in 5 minutes (loopback if), and I can POST or=20 PUT up 4GB, but I have to get/set content length headers myself rather=20 than rely on the java.net client and servlet implementations to handle = it: http://smartfrog.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smartfrog/trunk/core/componen= ts/www/src/org/smartfrog/services/www/bulkio/client/SunJavaBulkIOClient.j= ava?revision=3D8430&view=3Dmarkup If you can control the client, then maybe you would be able to do >4GB=20 uploads, but otherwise you are stuck with data <2GB in size, which is,=20 -what- 4-8 blocks in a production cluster? -steve ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB802D.E296B520-- From general-return-2364-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 18:16:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33222 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 18:16:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 18:16:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 36111 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 18:16:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35970 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 18:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35962 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 18:16:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:16:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:16:46 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1736498vws.35 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:16:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.249.203 with SMTP id ml11mr3966944qcb.266.1289326584514; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:16:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.114.209 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:16:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CD976AC.6030203@gmail.com> References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> <4CD976AC.6030203@gmail.com> From: Aaron Myers Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:16:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64caa7e11c9550494a2bda6 --0016e64caa7e11c9550494a2bda6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Wojciech Langiewicz, On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > But name of this option 'hadoop.tmp.dir' is at least a little confusing. > You can set the dfs.data.dir config value to a separate directory from the hadoop.tmp.dir. By default, the value of this variable is set to "file://${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/data", which is why the HDFS data blocks were put there as a subdirectory of the hadoop.tmp.dir. See these for more details: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/core-default.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/hdfs-default.html Hope that helps, Aaron --0016e64caa7e11c9550494a2bda6-- From general-return-2365-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 09 18:42:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50199 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 18:42:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 18:42:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 80588 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 18:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80352 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 18:42:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44848 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 14:35:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-Id: <4CD95C0E.107@tum.de> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:34:54 +0100 From: Benjamin Gufler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Lightning/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: cleaning up 'hadoop.tmp.dir' ? References: <4CD940FC.5000306@gmail.com> <4CD954D1.1080403@gmail.com> <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD95AC5.2010609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2010-11-09 15:29, Wojciech Langiewicz wrote: > What might be causing situation where I have about 5TB in HDFS and > hadoop tmp dirs have about 16TB in total? Have you turned on replication? A replication factor of 3 would explain the size difference. Ben From general-return-2366-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 09:45:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40273 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 09:45:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 09:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 76195 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 09:45:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76044 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 09:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76036 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 09:45:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:45:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:45:32 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:45:08 +0100 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:44:48 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:42:46 +0100 Subject: CDH3 / 0.20 config Thread-Topic: CDH3 / 0.20 config Thread-Index: AcuBhMuYvBqHcNNAQYa/y4cfC3nxSw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005E_01CB818D.2D9432D0" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01CB818D.2D9432D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Can I use these pages as a reference for configuration? Are they not outdated for / ahead of version 0.20? core-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html hdfs-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/hdfs-default.html mapred-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/current/mapred-default.html Are there any such pages for other config files? (fair- / capacity-scheduler, hadoop-policy, mapred-queue-acls) A good configuration overview is lacking at the moment, as far as I can see. If time permits, I might provide one for 0.20. Cheers, Evert Lammerts Consultant eScience Support SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization Phone: +31 20 888 4101 Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl http://www.sara.nl ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01CB818D.2D9432D0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMTExMTA5NDI0NlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFBrbr6W/ gARVijjOYgei2/QB8mCxMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAV0MRMdGx1k4G4InyB+SsgkbNBEQI95qX98GucAwmdS6rbw9XQEd7cBh/gqaftMGgPoTv6Unk mI/SWCow1DSFsNCOnijm+Ej4TWI35cm9qMEFj3EiupGfJq/IOaBrB5oJHt5nG5yggZxPgjcK0bT7 VsxwOd/rSMvqx12Y946Mb+HUJHCDWTVFCkzROmnwYht25Sw0wXKwKZHY68udbwu0Om49lzdlYjBz d/pLSEYHpJQBX3yGCHE9A+Iqw8TLLj+aeRfPMpvcHu8Ix0oByv7D114bU6Use7hcrNdkly55ZPeQ Xl4xGsAKKghG09zBKmYnaQQ1SZczDx7AYvbyGZRpEwAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_005E_01CB818D.2D9432D0-- From general-return-2367-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 10:00:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45392 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 10:00:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 10:00:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 89868 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:01:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89572 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89558 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 10:01:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:01:09 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so795027fxm.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:00:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=RMZkmaZxl7scEe0rbsoaQeCF0KskpFBV8KWLaOxzDGM=; b=Kj32OAg1wNFpvwl5uUcAGHQ1D9J54aXDDRW4b6KeuATb+1nIBFh34rlLcZrPqLmHbs Tgsr36mSUAv+Clu67mWFgVB5ez0pPaedPclUhXxL+2VYpe20NLDb4B9bi+JN3jz4Xegl 5qQCUyrB8/TqnSOKQgSyapqz/22A+lcwnNB9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=HoliqwT9gpVdTbbmvUpqVDN0+dUfcfQf8Pt364+ShliDRF+Kj0JgLXHNBxFfucxozg SzC+yFKHPIHmM9hMEPWKC24MFbwQb/9jTYdSNnpNBvf0Zp8LpycZ8iTHidvSOtmVYhkU 3e4SbdAppW26V0Yjegk030/l/uw7ZF/ivd+8o= Received: by 10.223.89.142 with SMTP id e14mr104658fam.143.1289469649390; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:00:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:00:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:30:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CDH3 / 0.20 config To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I use these pages as a reference for configuration? Are they not > outdated for / ahead of version 0.20? > > core-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > hdfs-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/hdfs-default.html > mapred-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/current/mapred-default.html For 0.20.2, see these specific urls: core-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/core-default.html hdfs-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.20.2/hdfs-default.html mapred-site.xml: http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.20.0/mapred-default.html In trunk, many of these properties have been renamed, and their former counterparts deprecated. -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2368-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 10:16:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58075 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 10:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 10:16:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12714 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:17:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12415 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:17:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12407 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 10:17:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:17:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:17:16 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:16:53 +0100 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:16:53 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:14:52 +0100 Subject: RE: CDH3 / 0.20 config Thread-Topic: CDH3 / 0.20 config Thread-Index: AcuBh2pfifx3QHosTS+luxq8X56VrAAAaX/A Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CB8191.A9C3BED0" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CB8191.A9C3BED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > hdfs-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.20.2/hdfs-default.html > mapred-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.20.0/mapred-default.html These two don't exist. With r0.21 the URLs do work, but is that info valid for 0.20? Cheers, Evert ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CB8191.A9C3BED0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMTExMTEwMTQ1MlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFP5aWskt YA8915Wc7Q8l15YJj5OCMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAPS4AUfTon2nU3kENbNOEejBKbL+ziYi0HvkClm2Osgb1FQDrXFVjHtABqeuqn9ylGxGitPuv 5CPzb+TpO5qhkIqx3GJEO62nIlPGt632rYTxcPR395moYK+iUKRlMvlHA1zK6dQWRvU2BI/ujJKD TaAbjxeL1Du7A3l/WD3EiOWCdjaIm7MkV8KxXq5ZvLpsj+0FID63wmT/zG9QrUuPDQ0J9+4F3Ena +YPhV/nd/4JzRzC6VMnx+vJZdO+G01MS+Gs0ns5oea1WkFpd2i0znYNzkAB/fbMGitxbfLC+EIKH Kk49h0RTRqF71bnA7FSMD4ycT8m6RWkn0Row0ts86gAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CB8191.A9C3BED0-- From general-return-2369-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 10:41:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69650 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 45695 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:42:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45511 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45499 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 10:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.98] (HELO nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:42:14 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.33] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1033.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 772645.31588.bm@omp1033.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91219 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Nov 2010 10:41:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1289472113; bh=pYhbeCIWNO/Z3aCZEMC1ycY2aQCZrOwS/4lF+Y3vprk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NeczgIVjwZMrjb/cHldcFHn4lvs9WaN1FUEVOJ1tacg4m6UmmhKhb12RMPTNUjiUkFAzHokQ9tnmrx0iQ4UZ2OOXW39MQLbSkYgmCnW7E3MwkHWzwgsmT+dKbVMChpT0QGPDR1xEAYwfGWauoAj0HEgnuTIPETfkhlbInb7P1dk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KThyA7Yg5YA9d4KuSIUnHgV0l05phHStn2LrvCVRQP25z71profwwLM1UC6tCvkobrAfEL9gwBF1DtykGJ+POfs+XHl+X3j+6A/Lakp91Su0ck7vyi91QfofUsLvfVjbEWwPOZMlkmroeIHdKANi3Z/Nv46fm8apzdaDRZiqNCE=; Message-ID: <365982.91127.qm@web112117.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: deVw.mAVM1nsRYjzQhdygWg9lx8OcP2QxXg5j0pbaKvZaHV T3CIs0OGR Received: from [129.132.85.169] by web112117.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:41:52 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:41:52 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Hadoop - stop-dfs.sh, stop-mapred.sh does not stop all instances To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1855586541-1289472112=:91127" --0-1855586541-1289472112=:91127 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, Probably is a stupid question but I don't figure out what happens. For example I start on master, start-dfs.sh, start-mapred.sh However, when I want to stop: stop-mapred, stop-dfs, only one slave instance is killed. For example in on the master I am doing something like that: rgrandl@ikq01:~/hadoop/hadoop-0.21.0$ bin/stop-mapred.sh stopping jobtracker ikq02.rrr: no tasktracker to stop ikq03.rrr: stopping tasktracker But I have a tasktracker on ikq02 as well which is not stopped anyway. rgrandl@ikq02:~$ jps 2462 Jps 2211 TaskTracker 2109 DataNode Same thing for stop-dfs.sh Always the tasktracker, datanode instances are killed only on one slave node, even if I have maybe 20 slaves or more. Thanks for any clue, Robert --0-1855586541-1289472112=:91127-- From general-return-2370-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 10:45:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72437 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 10:45:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 10:45:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 50351 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:45:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50149 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 10:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50141 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 10:45:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:45:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:45:48 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so817974fxm.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:45:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=lchiolcccRzt1813Qy5vhNwd4Er3q7PCgjQyc9l/3/g=; b=ejX+3N0kfnHZh76nt1J8EsqIaAFdK7+WZegd4SmTFznBOYBlKVnH14291BYdfhOoym /n1m/ESZQsu2PZopDsB7OCalasRTn86B3DTJvoK3jfEl0bJ8qrCiIXBZ/8wUalGf2Ks+ Yo9cb1wWHtFuFAtRhHa2EttMdni3jrdm5v7TU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=W0Kbv+mLWu0cmJyC1TaOejwvjOPH5lvh8cNDNABs+B/Y5cWbKyqcho4QUXTNo5db0u hz6c/0VcQw5Df94n6sjN+oQF6GpDl2X3qQ9kwh+sU+am27reYOC+BqGSviEBq9y1Kgvk QhOfwNIaNqwJmKJVLyUIR007Hyt2cneXZX7tU= Received: by 10.223.86.76 with SMTP id r12mr115610fal.86.1289472328554; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:45:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:45:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:15:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CDH3 / 0.20 config To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Evert Lammerts wrote: >> hdfs-site.xml: >> http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.20.2/hdfs-default.html >> mapred-site.xml: >> http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/r0.20.0/mapred-default.html > > These two don't exist. With r0.21 the URLs do work, but is that info valid > for 0.20? Oops, forgot that the split happened later. These should work fine, and apply properly to 0.20.2: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/hdfs-default.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/mapred-default.html r0.21 is a minor release, so using their config page should be okay too. I do not know how many new props have been added though. > > Cheers, Evert > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2371-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 17:20:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5942 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 17:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 17:20:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 91668 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 17:21:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91566 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 17:21:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91558 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 17:21:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:21:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:21:00 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so455123vws.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.9 with SMTP id k9mr931112qcm.248.1289496038746; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:38 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CDH3 / 0.20 config From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636164a2b542c8d0494ca312a --001636164a2b542c8d0494ca312a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi all, > > Can I use these pages as a reference for configuration? Are they not > outdated for / ahead of version 0.20? > > core-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > hdfs-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/hdfs-default.html > mapred-site.xml: > http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/current/mapred-default.html > > Are there any such pages for other config files? (fair- / > capacity-scheduler, hadoop-policy, mapred-queue-acls) > > These are in the docs, eg http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/service_level_auth.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/fair_scheduler.html http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/capacity_scheduler.html A good configuration overview is lacking at the moment, as far as I can see. > If time permits, I might provide one for 0.20. > That would be great. Thanks, Eli > > Cheers, > > Evert Lammerts > Consultant eScience Support > SARA Computing & Network Services > High Performance Computing & Visualization > > Phone: +31 20 888 4101 > Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl > http://www.sara.nl > > > --001636164a2b542c8d0494ca312a-- From general-return-2372-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 11 20:28:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7268 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2010 20:28:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2010 20:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 22486 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 20:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22371 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2010 20:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22362 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2010 20:29:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:29:04 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so1667946gxk.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.136.8 with SMTP id r8mr1422434ict.84.1289507322010; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:28:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm2807080iba.16.2010.11.11.12.28.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:28:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:28:38 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop - stop-dfs.sh, stop-mapred.sh does not stop all instances Message-ID: <20101111202838.GA18696@linspire.com> References: <365982.91127.qm@web112117.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <365982.91127.qm@web112117.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Without much details I only can offer to check if your master hosts (NN, JT) have passwordless access to all slaves Cos On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:41AM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Probably is a stupid question but I don't figure out what happens. >=20 > For example I start on master, start-dfs.sh, start-mapred.sh >=20 > However, when I want to stop: stop-mapred, stop-dfs, only one slave insta= nce is killed.=20 >=20 > For example in on the master I am doing something like that: >=20 > rgrandl@ikq01:~/hadoop/hadoop-0.21.0$ bin/stop-mapred.sh=20 > stopping jobtracker > ikq02.rrr: no tasktracker to stop > ikq03.rrr: stopping tasktracker >=20 > But I have a tasktracker on ikq02 as well which is not stopped anyway. > rgrandl@ikq02:~$ jps > 2462 Jps > 2211 TaskTracker > 2109 DataNode >=20 > Same thing for stop-dfs.sh >=20 >=20 > Always the tasktracker, datanode instances are killed only on one slave n= ode, even if I have maybe 20 slaves or more.=20 >=20 > Thanks for any clue, > Robert >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > =20 From general-return-2373-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 02:17:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70814 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 02:17:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 02:17:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 37315 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:17:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37231 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37223 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 02:17:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:17:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:17:50 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so617034qwf.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:17:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pV+prLxQck9H59aSl7hJNNgv1vbKPgCXhrCRtE++ACU=; b=b8ZzzsP6Xp90z0I7aJtPskzqO60hORSsG00sxXFXirxI0ZJ7BonZ8NPh7kwen6Dj8k yvn3/PT8rHXKS+YtsL3eXUDNExDSykHOF4Rw4W1Dv6yKLbOGzrLnO3LCOdnGAOCyOZ8e +5t3dpBe6RfZKHB9n4QCftBAKDHZJw7VCQSAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WUfH51aRgpLZGJBr54MboWAByzvrMyQBr0jCJ9m/FnmGCxsJoPGcxpzr6cnk05iBME vAbUAUoug8IPuS15Ol6USEzeyr2iG8c2diryLGyiMvmzcY2BS8B4VzCkvQADW99sdgBO iNAQ5gRRSFN3ys0hoSG0G9iToSd7G4U9LHUmU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.90.196 with SMTP id j4mr1341740qcm.270.1289528250079; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:17:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:17:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: running hadoop jobs from within a program From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636310649461a5d0494d1b1ef --001636310649461a5d0494d1b1ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Currently I run my sample hadoop job from a bash script using the following command ... [code] tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-$i/ /user/vadmin/output/output-$i/ $tmp [/code] However, I would want to write a timer that would do some cleanup after the jobs are complete and restart the jobs after x hours. What I am looking for is the ability to invoke job from within a program and not the jar command thing. -Mac --001636310649461a5d0494d1b1ef-- From general-return-2374-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 02:18:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71270 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 02:18:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 02:18:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39488 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:19:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39410 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:19:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39359 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 02:19:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:19:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:19:06 +0000 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so103364qyk.14 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:18:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QIJA6xzCLDDJAw31peRMOcyqezI6M3vC0ZdjhXktOXg=; b=NN9hLKli716fh2LNqPfR/8ri39JZiBdbKnV5Ay0ZVzkeQVFk8rNZAEQs+MIFZzVEDw 6G6NndeM7GivedO6CY4KF7GMn4SVOOX7Bi/+zlEsnog74DTUqG9/A2HzWcbEFfdqm3ad qETX1pPYHfgSKlou4fC+P4REVf395wregWMw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LJ/aIYnwD1Y4+ZDq25GX8QCB4d1Wu0mQ41e96kzfsbelLCq0VN9QzH99GvJraeq68x KZhPXie31j6GDMO59qzRdR112InDqGCXxc1dIGhKE9g/7Ip28XzR15lGL9U0rRn55UJZ 4Zj9GYumhCa/hIRZsjRSl+Acloqx+V4kmdbUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.6 with SMTP id m6mr1365479qcl.80.1289528325593; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:18:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:18:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:18:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: browsing mailing list From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163642752dc65af90494d1b5c1 --00163642752dc65af90494d1b5c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This might be silly question, but how is the mailing list supposed to be searched/browsed ? Is there any client to download all the messages ? What do you guys do ? -Mac --00163642752dc65af90494d1b5c1-- From general-return-2375-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 02:26:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72809 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 02:26:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 02:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 50218 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:27:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50162 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50154 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 02:27:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:27:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:26:58 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so1580466fxm.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:26:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.114.202 with SMTP id f10mr893117faq.67.1289528795952; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.98.204 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:26:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:26:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: browsing mailing list From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ...because you asked, what do you guys do... I do http://www.search-hadoop.com/ -Shrijeet On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:18 PM, web service wrote: > This might be silly question, but how is the mailing list supposed to be > searched/browsed ? Is there any client to download all the messages ? What > do you guys do ? > > -Mac > From general-return-2376-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 02:28:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73285 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 02:28:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 02:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 53174 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53086 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53075 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:29:09 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so625920qwf.35 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:28:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hlNoEvPFQFSFQQMIHoAtH6AYPMabhw+VLokBMg+3nGs=; b=m4lOEPeboeEWH7mAyfDwKDv/Otp9pDvM7be0VaznkQzT0CwEODvuhM1HTGLrDp9bUb tJHNDKy/U/RnCZ9LrtuWuCSfrhDvAirXl3kIHC0RaTvpdR8ImfGstzxSNx8d+Jo9fCUO OlYSDWJxVTvy1Ba8QPQhgennjn3bm27/LvL/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=l/6RAnCHsOXm7GPCnCVdhZoU2gFv5f/2J8fe0J2V4EzzfiG6S/8NWFxuzFsEmRUXOl q1rw2JvorFqXZIy6/kSUWzG27Kym8SGnjnhmn9sziof6RPCpMzJ/GbXtIa/HEVT9b15Y Jgt60d8+WcsuHDU+a2H9LkP2W09phTky2YbuM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.6 with SMTP id m6mr1373813qcl.80.1289528925969; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:28:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:28:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: browsing mailing list From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163642752d8fb7c50494d1d96e --00163642752d8fb7c50494d1d96e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanks. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > ...because you asked, what do you guys do... > > I do http://www.search-hadoop.com/ > > -Shrijeet > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:18 PM, web service wrote: > > This might be silly question, but how is the mailing list supposed to be > > searched/browsed ? Is there any client to download all the messages ? > What > > do you guys do ? > > > > -Mac > > > --00163642752d8fb7c50494d1d96e-- From general-return-2377-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 03:16:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94220 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 03:16:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 03:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 94954 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 03:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94844 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 03:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94836 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 03:17:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:17:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:17:04 +0000 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so148783qyk.14 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:16:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mO/7S9JreUWjl+rGsNgthmTDoSJa7VPVIXaHuTIUp9I=; b=DI02iXXTKZd92r8YiE1oZXw2/AtKnmP1kVYmDCfrYFkXqYYJnHgBMf7ozkOku0kSD+ cuFYXS0SJbTXS/gjOUzk+7AfvlkYYoLBMsX25g4QRFpDwG1NuL8tzDHt5YMJfPeAqqba E0p/srNxWra7UgznI28hqHfCrqHRlFcZsrhlg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wlz9Pt8o7oIYLyM1yMi1mzmvu2r5koHwXspLkPkKT0zGn9EcLOxFu5vzx45C/OQA6b IMYTvDPvHvUOGvF1KTxBhaH4YCqzywEgUa7f8dJb5X0rGYbrjOtL9EYtidXnAy6a00nT LCtgImP+CZO5wcGwxjhVp3vEwIsFAzfvNxBa4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.90.196 with SMTP id j4mr1393166qcm.270.1289531803616; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:16:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163631064914c5d80494d2851b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163631064914c5d80494d2851b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 would submitting, say for example 3 jobs from a jobclient be different than invoking the below command 3 times ? On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:17 PM, web service wrote: > Hi, > Currently I run my sample hadoop job from a bash script using the > following command ... > > [code] > tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-$i/ > /user/vadmin/output/output-$i/ > $tmp > [/code] > > However, I would want to write a timer that would do some cleanup after the > jobs are complete and restart the jobs after x hours. What I am looking for > is > the ability to invoke job from within a program and not the jar command > thing. > > -Mac > --00163631064914c5d80494d2851b-- From general-return-2378-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 08:55:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30337 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 08:55:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 08:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19796 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 08:55:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19649 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 08:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19630 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 08:55:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dsikar@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:38 +0000 Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so1961178gyf.35 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v5/QimbCOTOPuMVj45f91RzxtD/d15o+KNkvwzsvi+k=; b=i4oKCbt2LNQ1zgcD7BuSCzKR7Yn6JvAX0MW7z/xOq7O+K1q/wJfXGBLRfgjgU0bLSL 4vURQSsc4SEZuJadeBKpR/MKMiB4m6kpDtRM3xamrZYkNjwKMxP8O/natmCV2pVN1EcS PaVFdeWabt/0EcnFSlLNI0ex0fLdBCKhmTKqA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=huFXRxusytLdnfyRhnA1ZlieL6aeyTbPCCWpIdbgOyAAY8W7oXGIFXdcqAjLM4CrgH ekKJKHBpytcILIzqjPRxFrifWy99/tyTHH0nO/iTtqLbM8DgImRl3U1IxHyphSdTY3Db t+rBKAyS1mKa7Xi1tnNj5B8OmXshQ+ojtfVY8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.11.24 with SMTP id o24mr2830058agi.55.1289552117664; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.78.5 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:55:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:17 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program From: daniel sikar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I suggest you write a loop in your bash script, grepping for finished, then take it from there. Also, you can submit the same job as many times as you like. On 12 November 2010 02:17, web service wrote: > Hi, > =A0Currently I run my sample hadoop job from a bash script using the > following command ... > > [code] > tmp=3D"$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC =A0$MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-$i/ > /user/vadmin/output/output-$i/ > $tmp > [/code] > > However, I would want to write a timer that would do some cleanup after t= he > jobs are =A0complete and restart the jobs after x hours. What I am lookin= g for > is > the ability to invoke job from within a program and not the jar command > thing. > > -Mac > From general-return-2379-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 09:31:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48667 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 09:31:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 09:31:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 51391 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 09:31:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51266 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 09:31:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51258 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 09:31:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:31:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:31:34 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so1692493eyz.35 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.8.67 with SMTP id g3mr1614167ebg.38.1289554272928; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:31:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.78 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:30:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alejandro Abdelnur Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:30:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mac, You should a look at Oozie, it will allow you to do what you describe. You can either build Oozie from https://github.com/yahoo/oozie or download CDH3b3 distribution from http://www.cloudera.com/downloads/ (Oozie is preconfigured to work with CHD3b3 Hadoop). Hope this helps. Alejandro On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, daniel sikar wrote: > I suggest you write a loop in your bash script, grepping for finished, > then take it from there. > Also, you can submit the same job as many times as you like. > > On 12 November 2010 02:17, web service wrote: >> Hi, >> =A0Currently I run my sample hadoop job from a bash script using the >> following command ... >> >> [code] >> tmp=3D"$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC =A0$MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-$i/ >> /user/vadmin/output/output-$i/ >> $tmp >> [/code] >> >> However, I would want to write a timer that would do some cleanup after = the >> jobs are =A0complete and restart the jobs after x hours. What I am looki= ng for >> is >> the ability to invoke job from within a program and not the jar command >> thing. >> >> -Mac >> > From general-return-2380-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 16:55:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69788 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 16:55:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 16:55:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 80144 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 16:55:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79954 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 16:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79946 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 16:55:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:55:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:55:33 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so169800vws.35 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Mxd+HM2VnBSlvOQOrmOm1PK0nML5kKgFakroI3TWJNM=; b=rRVR8h6ePlV1OyjsH9T1/3kb/S/kshL4UlrQzJuzsk2EzDsCVETUF/pQiOA1llau1E ly/B00ksSGwPV65NUyMrKsCLAZfoDP+chprcEUBQpnxNdlBwApbf96SfxxsdGv4ostO1 nv7l5a02ols9h3waHsUbGK+pyb/Rt3/t1Tc4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MfiqczTv8NFdQ6e8U370xwYA87l9nQlFu+GYwVKEa5J+TpOYvNO7Nq/wfWSVcwiQSz 5V4iQIXGs2h9fOg0qJQEHcepUE0Oih4HKROA5wcIF9K7uty7rjTtP2xeuS+y/pqRCe4N r8/7ow1gB9FS/+RJNgfPqpV7Ul9RqCEXTWUUU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.242.66 with SMTP id lh2mr2043464qcb.118.1289580912164; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362843d62dc0850494ddf41f --0016362843d62dc0850494ddf41f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, but submitting three different jobs say using JobClient.submitjob(jobconf1); JobClient.submitjob(jobconf2); JobClient.submitjob(jobconf3) different from running - tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-1/ /user/vadmin/output/output-1/ tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-2/ /user/vadmin/output/output-2/ tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-3/ /user/vadmin/output/output-3/ I guess every job can have specific jvm options. and I hope that every submitted job runs in a separate jvm, No ? On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, daniel sikar wrote: > I suggest you write a loop in your bash script, grepping for finished, > then take it from there. > Also, you can submit the same job as many times as you like. > > On 12 November 2010 02:17, web service wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently I run my sample hadoop job from a bash script using the > > following command ... > > > > [code] > > tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-$i/ > > /user/vadmin/output/output-$i/ > > $tmp > > [/code] > > > > However, I would want to write a timer that would do some cleanup after > the > > jobs are complete and restart the jobs after x hours. What I am looking > for > > is > > the ability to invoke job from within a program and not the jar command > > thing. > > > > -Mac > > > --0016362843d62dc0850494ddf41f-- From general-return-2381-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 17:52:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10133 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 17:52:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 17:52:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 70638 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 17:53:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70571 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 17:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70525 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 17:53:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:53:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:53:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 10018 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 17:52:24 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:52:24 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so302130wwd.5 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.196 with SMTP id m4mr2744878wbv.57.1289584373191; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.152.139 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:52:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.2 From: Patrick Hunt To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3.2 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.3.2 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.3.2/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-2382-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 19:06:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63105 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 19:06:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 19:06:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 99275 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 19:06:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99236 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 19:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99223 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 19:06:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:06:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com designates 64.41.141.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.41.141.19] (HELO barracuda.mygazoo.com) (64.41.141.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:06:35 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1289588769-3095aa900001-IjwG86 Received: from sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com (sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com [10.38.20.8]) by barracuda.mygazoo.com with ESMTP id uaF0cZhsZbQ3wGWq for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:06:09 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Minearo@Reardencommerce.com Received: from sccorpmail02.mygazoo.com ([10.38.20.9]) by sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:06:09 -0800 Received: from sccorpmail03.mygazoo.com (10.38.20.15) by sccorpmail02.mygazoo.com (10.38.20.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:06:08 -0800 X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: 10.38.20.9 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 10.38.20.9 Received: from fccorpmail03.mygazoo.com ([fe80::6116:1dc:5867:46dc]) by sccorpmail03.mygazoo.com ([fe80::5cfd:f627:680f:3e2a%18]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:06:08 -0800 From: Peter Minearo X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: fe80::6116:1dc:5867:46dc To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) Thread-Topic: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) Thread-Index: AcuCnA2hU9lcsVVcQBSDXhBCkmHiqg== Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:06:08 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [63.81.0.20] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2010 19:06:09.0182 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA2DABE0:01CB829C] X-Barracuda-Connect: sccorpmail01.mygazoo.com[10.38.20.8] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1289588769 X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.38.16.13:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mygazoo.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.46444 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Not sure who or where to send this to, but this is for the Cloudera distrib= ution of Hadoop: I just tried to install CDH3 on my Ubuntu machine > more /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=3DUbuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=3D10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=3Dlucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=3D"Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" I got the following error: > sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: hadoop-0.20: Depends: sun-java6-jre but it is not installable Depends: sun-java6-bin but it is not installable E: Broken packages I have Jave 1.6 installed: > java -version java version "1.6.0_22" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode) What I found was, in order to get the install to work properly; you have to= do an extra step. In Step #4 on https://docs.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Ha= doop+Installation+%28CDH3%29 there is: > apt-cache search hadoop > sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 Between these 2 commands there are 2 other commands that are needed: > echo "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner" | sudo tee /etc/ap= t/sources.list.d/partner.list > apt-get update So, until Cloudera fixes the install (or documentation) in order to install= the CDH3 on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) the steps should look like: > apt-cache search hadoop > echo "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner" | sudo tee /etc/ap= t/sources.list.d/partner.list > apt-get update > sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 Does anyone know, if this is being looked at? Thanks, Peter From general-return-2383-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 19:48:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83556 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 19:48:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 19:48:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 70572 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 19:49:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70524 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 19:49:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70516 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 19:49:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:49:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:48:57 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oACJmFZu058973 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:48:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:48:15 -0800 From: Alfred Thompson To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:48:14 -0800 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.2 Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.2 Thread-Index: AcuCkpMB4jnzGb7BRCeRD1Atgp8ONAAD/d8X Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C902D9FD1280Datxyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C902D9FD1280Datxyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well done. On 11/12/10 10:52 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote: The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3= .2 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.3.2 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.3.2/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team --_000_C902D9FD1280Datxyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2384-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 22:04:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50186 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 22:04:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 22:04:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 38680 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 22:04:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38606 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 22:04:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38598 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 22:04:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:04:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:04:50 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so414813qyk.14 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.233.74 with SMTP id jx10mr2325012qcb.96.1289599469102; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) From: Eli Collins To: Peter.Minearo@reardencommerce.com, CDH Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Peter, Moving this thread to the CDH user mailing list (BCC general@). This step is covered in the JDK installation page which is linked to in the red "Important" section at the top of the installation page you were looking at. https://docs.cloudera.com/display/DOC/Java+Development+Kit+Installation Thanks, Eli On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Peter Minearo wrote: > Not sure who or where to send this to, but this is for the Cloudera distr= ibution of Hadoop: > > I just tried to install CDH3 on my Ubuntu machine > >> more /etc/lsb-release > DISTRIB_ID=3DUbuntu > DISTRIB_RELEASE=3D10.04 > DISTRIB_CODENAME=3Dlucid > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=3D"Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" > > I got the following error: >> sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > =A0hadoop-0.20: Depends: sun-java6-jre but it is not installable > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Depends: sun-java6-bin but it is not installa= ble > E: Broken packages > > I have Jave 1.6 installed: >> java -version > java version "1.6.0_22" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode) > > What I found was, in order to get the install to work properly; you have = to do an extra step. =A0 In Step #4 on https://docs.cloudera.com/display/DO= C/Hadoop+Installation+%28CDH3%29 =A0there is: > >> apt-cache search hadoop >> sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 > > Between these 2 commands there are 2 other commands that are needed: >> echo "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner" | sudo tee /etc/a= pt/sources.list.d/partner.list >> apt-get update > > So, until Cloudera fixes the install (or documentation) in order to insta= ll the CDH3 on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) the steps should look like: > >> apt-cache search hadoop >> echo "deb http://archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner" | sudo tee /etc/a= pt/sources.list.d/partner.list >> apt-get update >> sudo apt-get install hadoop-0.20 > > Does anyone know, if this is being looked at? > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > From general-return-2385-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 12 23:49:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95922 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2010 23:49:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2010 23:49:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 6657 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 23:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6587 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2010 23:49:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6579 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2010 23:49:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:49:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amp@opendns.com designates 67.215.68.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.215.68.163] (HELO mail.opendns.com) (67.215.68.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:49:30 +0000 Received: from Adams-Desktop.local ([67.215.69.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.opendns.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id oACNn9s8001920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:49:09 GMT Message-ID: <4CDDD275.9020901@opendns.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:49:09 -0800 From: Adam Phelps User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Starting hadoop services at boot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm sure there is some detail I'm missing, but I've been testing node failures and noticed that the various services (datanode, tasktracker, regionserver in my case) don't automatically restart on boot (I'm running on Ubuntu on EC2). Its currently hiding from me, however I assume there is a configuration setting somewhere that enables this? I noticed that there various start scripts in /etc/init.d: root@ip-10-123-1-151:~/control# ls /etc/init.d/hadoop* /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-datanode /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-namenode /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-tasktracker /etc/init.d/hadoop-hbase-regionserver /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-jobtracker /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-secondarynamenode /etc/init.d/hadoop-hbase-master /etc/init.d/hadoop-hbase-thrift However these don't actually appear to work in this setup: root@ip-10-123-1-151:~/control# /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-namenode stop Stopping Hadoop namenode daemon: no namenode to stop ERROR root@ip-10-123-1-151:~/control# /etc/init.d/hadoop-0.20-namenode start Starting Hadoop namenode daemon: starting namenode, logging to /usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/bin/../logs/hadoop-root-namenode-ip-10-123-1-151.out /usr/lib/hadoop-0.20/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh: line 114: /var/run/hadoop/hadoop-root-namenode.pid: Permission denied nice: cannot set niceness: Permission denied ERROR. I'm currently starting services using "hadoop-daemon.sh start XXX". Thanks - Adam From general-return-2386-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 14 02:54:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60075 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2010 02:54:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2010 02:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 39550 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 02:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39307 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 02:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39299 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2010 02:54:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:54:23 +0000 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so1518216qyk.14 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:54:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dBVsMpk3BSCCEaV7yD8tRs7Tp9tq6LOiU9Hb+KspOW8=; b=WKWFAEnToH2m8LgJju/VeECKRBwhXPar6pwnqYLAZqOCsUo9tmi+jHLySVl+U1Yzi5 Ok1VJcndfQDuBr7tsPHArHtytDWgeW5wTXpg6AJOI9muvyn8A1X0wQBE6DfuUr8LE23l Kpar7xpkx+UPJjVpf8pZGEo36+UHzWV5zeFsc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mDzHbl7MmqgjG6fcDw2L2FMTc2fzKta9ETZYdE8IAJIsbcG2lx2RM7A40kYqmuXc6h wwyOWhJQ8pTlXpXvwDhcXgbyabGD2Ha08DPZ/xRZkXgRNYloucVhoziFP5dH21ppBl86 H8DpYmieLY+BiaMCjPjGRWES07LvQSD5wxwgM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.242.66 with SMTP id lh2mr3493314qcb.118.1289703242633; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:54:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:54:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Accessing hdfs from a program not run with bin/hadoop From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362843d6a4907c0494fa6f39 --0016362843d6a4907c0494fa6f39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am running a program with the following code. [code] ............ conf.addResource(new Path("file:///home/mac/software/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/conf/core-site.xml")); fs = FileSystem.get(conf); fs.delete(new Path("hdfs://localhost:9000/user/mac/output/output-1"), true); ............ [/code] but I get the following exception, not sure what else configuration I would want to add. [code] Exception -- ....... Wrong FS: hdfs://localhost:9000/user/mac/output/output-1, expected: file:/// ....... [/code] --0016362843d6a4907c0494fa6f39-- From general-return-2387-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 14 05:18:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11604 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2010 05:18:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2010 05:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 72538 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 05:19:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72334 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 05:18:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72326 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2010 05:18:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:18:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:18:52 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so1320620qyk.14 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:18:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=c9pxumRkLomYw5TMyed2rcKCVm5vEeA+ALRtdIbrB2g=; b=vjz2I1t85ZgvEDs5gru+Yv28iXtCi1NpImhWMvK7fYEXc7xik5gaZoTsRQU0Nd0OVA syz3/Crw3AsNSRPFdVriAsOpA3xuqv/0aDMlvtrd7pr+CekVE2l4yFA70TqAKyHKyDJn XGgApqI8WyXUbvS7eHSuP9GSYsaLs0163gUsw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aVzXpd7PAOF/LpBwmc2D2kr3zLMM/8jDdNW/FHTSQ4n78poGjruz/jqpsIJnrizkRE AzN8L7R51Q3+UeNgPyb4G/Uw6nRC69lSvcV5NtLLcBSjktgJrnxeAAnLlQ5QBe/MHBVF 07adhjw+kzY8Cy/Lhkq556rQkYMPa3ek0xAAc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.90.196 with SMTP id j4mr3595330qcm.270.1289711911282; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:18:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:18:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Accessing hdfs from a program not run with bin/hadoop From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163631064955a8970494fc74e9 --00163631064955a8970494fc74e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ok, I need to access file system appropriately. This works. hdfs = FileSystem.get(new URI(HDFS_PATH),conf); On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:54 PM, web service wrote: > I am running a program with the following code. > > [code] > ............ > conf.addResource(new > Path("file:///home/mac/software/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/conf/core-site.xml")); > fs = FileSystem.get(conf); > fs.delete(new > Path("hdfs://localhost:9000/user/mac/output/output-1"), true); > ............ > [/code] > > but I get the following exception, not sure what else configuration I would > want to add. > > > [code] > Exception -- > ....... > Wrong FS: hdfs://localhost:9000/user/mac/output/output-1, expected: > file:/// > ....... > > [/code] > --00163631064955a8970494fc74e9-- From general-return-2388-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 14 12:23:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76671 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2010 12:23:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2010 12:23:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 50563 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 12:23:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50317 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 12:23:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50309 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2010 12:23:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:23:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:23:31 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so3045433fxm.35 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:23:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PIHqZIRH1RBWI4QpUUEICtQSqvYFIVJKdeilWdRdMEc=; b=AOggxWE8JiSSp9wslJoB2PXMD6N8euNv8evtwioU3datLfp/27PEjsgjKJdTJCi1/W lRPBMM+va/Y6b0zBF7Sh/L6DQmh4m/DZO+RtrSofjUcet3XoW342hsAjlPftpfg+Jr1q yCqDTTfM6eWfLHLcLo25QOAAIwwgDUet1ytPg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=THY+/xjNKNmhy7wnQHOPFlidWdKSH+J9RNVtzvzN7lkd9btQol1IVLzyiZbouCCO8c gFuYSypQYpvs+7tuo1TyngkWGXosl0yns1nlMYyAQkeHR0aj56Eitm68FpgpRDtPUszs oeO1Y0fp+iirAtPAVcfXU4WPWkl/QYAzLwMkA= Received: by 10.223.110.148 with SMTP id n20mr1866472fap.48.1289737389497; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:23:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:22:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:52:49 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:25 PM, web service wrote: > Thanks, but submitting three different jobs say using > > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf1); > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf2); > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf3) > > different from running - > tmp=3D"$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC =A0$MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-1/ > /user/vadmin/output/output-1/ > tmp=3D"$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC =A0$MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-2/ > /user/vadmin/output/output-2/ > tmp=3D"$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC =A0$MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-3/ > /user/vadmin/output/output-3/ It isn't different. In both cases a new JobID is assigned for each job created and its specific configuration is associated to it upon submission. > > I guess every job can have specific jvm options. and I hope that every > submitted job runs in a separate jvm, No ? Yes, each Task (Map or Reduce, under the Job) runs in a separate JVM (although JVMs can be reused using a tweak). --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2389-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 14 22:40:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15904 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2010 22:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2010 22:40:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 14643 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 22:41:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14600 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2010 22:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14592 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2010 22:41:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:41:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wbsrvc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:40:59 +0000 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so2059413qyk.14 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ifFgTI3TXXBpZAVWA/ZnscC8SDHuf8V4xqoWm2XwY0A=; b=dYGcmHvle5AC2YjQF79HKs1HpkER+WrmOXD289lcxegs880nuiTCXFj4BS0fmu/BMj mZU3rYdD2w5zPCBDjTZi7OL0GL95hWpYZvncD1leL8Gzr+sDIwPtERw0fuHPelKpmyL7 tF6cjNM8YwdeNd1luFXLDDbWpLZ/dcyNO3gsY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rKCnT/W+3N6yP61tT7Z1tyyo55GICiR4E7noMhtwD6i5fG9OrSFNlMjMcW4JGX6Iu3 i31/QIBsAprRTmG43rRVOF9hiw95wtimPIjFEC3fJXq3C9fqL1IiO415pnXbQ8YgGAsB snQKGz9SOHuvlmg+PREXQ5y3i5D/g0kfCcMK4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.85.208 with SMTP id p16mr4263509qcl.4.1289774437920; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.33.83 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:40:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: running hadoop jobs from within a program From: web service To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368322d436712804950b0334 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016368322d436712804950b0334 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, had figured it out. It is fun to figure out how things work :) On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Harsh J wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:25 PM, web service wrote: > > Thanks, but submitting three different jobs say using > > > > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf1); > > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf2); > > JobClient.submitjob(jobconf3) > > > > different from running - > > tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-1/ > > /user/vadmin/output/output-1/ > > tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-2/ > > /user/vadmin/output/output-2/ > > tmp="$HADOOP_BIN jar $JAR_LOC $MAIN_CLASS /user/joe/input/input-3/ > > /user/vadmin/output/output-3/ > > It isn't different. In both cases a new JobID is assigned for each job > created and its specific configuration is associated to it upon > submission. > > > > > I guess every job can have specific jvm options. and I hope that every > > submitted job runs in a separate jvm, No ? > > Yes, each Task (Map or Reduce, under the Job) runs in a separate JVM > (although JVMs can be reused using a tweak). > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --0016368322d436712804950b0334-- From general-return-2390-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 16 11:00:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11832 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 11:00:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 11:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 97967 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 11:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97765 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 11:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97757 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2010 11:00:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:00:52 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FF36BBA1 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:57:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CE2644D.6010606@crs4.it> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:00:29 +0100 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Announcing Pydoop 0.3.7_rc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everybody, The new Pydoop release with support for Hadoop 0.21 is out: Support for 0.20.2 is still there: you decide which version you want to use at compile time, by defining the HADOOP_HOME environment variable. As usual, we appreciate everyone's feedback. Links: * download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydoop/files * release notes: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pydoop/index.php?title=Release_Notes -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-2391-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 16 15:25:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42209 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 15:25:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 15:25:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17934 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 15:25:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17834 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 15:25:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4491 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2010 20:52:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cornelio.inigof@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C3zpUQpG3i6mxcj1ZQsy5LewjTYNpEUdvhwnjAjqbtQ=; b=RNalcgsSCfOfMEplmcEOWWtFuVAvfAtfphP3ntQhX+eWoy3ldul+W7tMR3QXh6JJde zC/Xpm4udSwIwyQ50m+0LhH0TVMP6vaHrSaNa6wcjma9ZB8128Qhr3Lhktr9NLsoJ/rk NsWF26Csi3XNnm7SsxskkfXC9NcKty0LhsH2U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=E3XNmwboGnSzMKGb7xg/BsoO3inpbPqo7kg9q8sxOtlI3fhypYPNOoLfLH9GYQu8z7 NdRvCtZdTIvpfVbgWeUzrsngKpNp7xvuWnzGcbU1BflOeMU8KLNsKIXlkW1KhNJwrCqE sUamzE2/+kzbRYNZsW4Vd5SsCkeKKFthrL6N8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:52:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: hadoop application to pig? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cornelio_I=F1igo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d1ca5ef5fbb04951d9d9b --0016364d1ca5ef5fbb04951d9d9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi My name is Cornelio I=F1igo and I=B4m a developer just beginning with this = of hadoop and pig. I have a doubt about developing an application on pig, I already have my program on hadoop, this program gets just a column from a dataset (csv file= ) and process this data with some functions (like language analisis, analysis of the content) note that in the process of the file I dont use FILTERS COUNTS or any buil= t in function of Pig, I think that all the fucntions have to be User Defined Functions so Is a good idea (has sense ) to develop this program in Pig? Thanks in advice --=20 *Cornelio* --0016364d1ca5ef5fbb04951d9d9b-- From general-return-2392-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 16 15:46:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49550 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 15:46:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 15:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 53614 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 15:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53500 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 15:47:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53491 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2010 15:47:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:47:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dgisrael@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:46:57 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so174246pwj.35 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:46:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YrhwB/U3g0VQNPM/Ipr61kjGLeDw4hoO8CO5K03TLco=; b=ElbBoVV9ixOw6nk41Plt19dyJ1tZtgbgydr1QNjQxgGK6fJxjoSDJHQiExjl50OuSx l6jEy/la9LBi3Rub7r/wzIBtVQ8PFRpSWK+lG5BfUCR2OgN/XvIiLlpFu1hJROkLCyzn faahWjJRS47KEyba59BAGq2j76Owqriq+GA3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MoI1P8iswpUM2QS1RDZKSnZTHCKlJYm5KktYrRrbfYRoRWu2Zr4eOecSTC+OArI+Um 7kuAtLcdp0J0MpRh5xUd/oO8pbWo7Y+aK6Layi9bxEt2zXq0VQViuxyAoUxRLFezruEh N+7XrqRHLxyq5XRuMRUHzBjW0WQG7zoOTPG+0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.87.67 with SMTP id v3mr4746124fal.130.1289922395138; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.13.68 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:46:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:46:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hadoop application to pig? From: David Gruzman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30434548266d7404952d76c8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30434548266d7404952d76c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am developing the similar application using vanilla map-reduce jobs. I think that any specific processing can be developed using MapReduce and probabbly will be more efficient. Higher level services like Pig or Hive should be used if you need to issue "ad hoc" queries to the data. With best regards, David On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Cornelio I=F1igo wrote: > Hi > > My name is Cornelio I=F1igo and I=B4m a developer just beginning with thi= s of > hadoop and pig. > I have a doubt about developing an application on pig, I already have my > program on hadoop, this program gets just a column from a dataset (csv > file) > and process this data with some functions (like language analisis, analys= is > of the content) > note that in the process of the file I dont use FILTERS COUNTS or any > built > in function of Pig, I think that all the fucntions have to be User Define= d > Functions > > so Is a good idea (has sense ) to develop this program in Pig? > > Thanks in advice > > -- > *Cornelio* > --20cf30434548266d7404952d76c8-- From general-return-2393-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 16 18:07:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28680 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 18:07:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 18:07:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5559 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 18:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5254 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 18:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5194 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2010 18:07:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:07:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gcabrer@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.149] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:07:35 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oAGHrusD007176 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:53:56 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id oAGI72Uf178642 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:07:04 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oAGI70kR028471 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:07:00 -0700 Received: from d03nm119.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm119.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.145]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id oAGI6wRf028220 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:59 -0700 Subject: Resources on building Hadoop with Apache Harmony Select X-KeepSent: 2847073D:085BCB36-862577DD:0063032E; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V852_06012010 June 01, 2010 Message-ID: From: Guillermo Cabrera Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:06:56 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM119/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP2|March 17, 2010) at 11/16/2010 11:06:58 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=09BBFD4EDFF085BE8f9e8a93df938690918c09BBFD4EDFF085BE" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=09BBFD4EDFF085BE8f9e8a93df938690918c09BBFD4EDFF085BE Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hello: For the past few months, we have been working on getting Hadoop (common= , hdfs and mapreduce) working on Apache Harmony Select. We have documente= d the steps we followed, issues we encountered and scripts we used in thi= s process. Please refer to the following link for further information. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopOnHarmony Regards, Guillermo ---------------------------------------------- IBM Emerging Internet Technology Group= --0__=09BBFD4EDFF085BE8f9e8a93df938690918c09BBFD4EDFF085BE-- From general-return-2394-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 16 22:33:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77761 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2010 22:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 22:32:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 22558 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 22:33:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22466 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2010 22:33:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22457 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2010 22:33:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:33:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:33:20 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so873103yxm.35 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.13.20 with SMTP id q20mr12786305ybi.434.1289946778981; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.139.42.54] ([166.137.8.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i64sm1095508yha.10.2010.11.16.14.32.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:32:58 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: hadoop application to pig? Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:47 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think it comes down to if you can translate your existing jobs into udfs a= nd custom steps which can run inside of a pig script, and how much effort th= at will take.=20 Writing pig scripts is much easier than writing m-r ones in my experience.=20= --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangel= o On 16/11/2010, at 10:46 AM, David Gruzman wrote: > I am developing the similar application using vanilla map-reduce jobs. I > think that any specific processing > can be developed using MapReduce and probabbly will be more efficient. > Higher level services like Pig or Hive should be used if you need to issue= > "ad hoc" queries to the data. > With best regards, > David >=20 > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Cornelio I=C3=B1igo > wrote: >=20 >> Hi >>=20 >> My name is Cornelio I=C3=B1igo and I=C2=B4m a developer just beginning wi= th this of >> hadoop and pig. >> I have a doubt about developing an application on pig, I already have my >> program on hadoop, this program gets just a column from a dataset (csv >> file) >> and process this data with some functions (like language analisis, analys= is >> of the content) >> note that in the process of the file I dont use FILTERS COUNTS or any >> built >> in function of Pig, I think that all the fucntions have to be User Define= d >> Functions >>=20 >> so Is a good idea (has sense ) to develop this program in Pig? >>=20 >> Thanks in advice >>=20 >> -- >> *Cornelio* >>=20 From general-return-2395-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 17 06:46:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19209 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 06:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 06:46:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 16747 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 06:47:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16526 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 06:47:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16518 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2010 06:47:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:47:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 06:47:18 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_yJJ6TMWsPcbnXv8ticquWQ)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LC0006P7O54MA60@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:46:17 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011160287 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-16_12:2010-11-16,2010-11-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:46:16 -0800 In-reply-to: <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> Message-id: <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_yJJ6TMWsPcbnXv8ticquWQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Just to follow up, the pre-commit patch testing is functioning again on Zookeeper and Hadoop Common. It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these projects currently have test failures. Are there Jira's to fix these tests? New instructions for re-trigger testing of a patch are at https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Admin/ Cheers, Nige On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Thanks Giri. > >> Longterm solution: >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly from jira. > > Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine. Any open Jira's for this work? If not, I'll open one. > >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart from the current status called "patch-available" > > Not sure that's necessary. I think if we change the patch testing model a little, we can keep the current workflow. Also, given some recent advances in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin job covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able to drastically improve utilization of the slaves we have. Let's move this discussion to a ticket. LMK if I need to open one. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > >> >> Old times: >> The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine hudson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira and create the patch queue for testing. >> >> Current situation: >> hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new machine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine. >> >> This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch queue. >> Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the new aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin job on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. >> >> Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Instead they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. >> >> I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. >> >> The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule builds. >> >> Longterm solution: >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly from jira. >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart from the current status called "patch-available" >> >> Thanks, >> Giri >> >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows to keep >>> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. >>> >>> There were at least two slightly different sources of information about what's >>> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about the >>> situation so comments can be more substantial? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cos >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS, >>>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from >>>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I >>>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit >>>> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let me >>>> know. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >> > --Boundary_(ID_yJJ6TMWsPcbnXv8ticquWQ)-- From general-return-2396-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 17 07:24:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36548 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 07:24:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 07:24:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 48651 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 07:25:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48446 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 07:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48433 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2010 07:25:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:25:09 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so1070157yxm.35 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:24:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.208.12 with SMTP id f12mr5973384ang.38.1289978686364; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:24:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g29sm6069658anh.16.2010.11.16.23.24.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:24:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:24:38 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch testing Message-ID: <20101117072437.GF6649@tp> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:46PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Just to follow up, the pre-commit patch testing is functioning again on > Zookeeper and Hadoop Common. It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS > but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. Loo= ks > like both these projects currently have test failures. Are there Jira's = to > fix these tests? In HDFS some of the tests are covered by JIRAs for sure. I haven't checked = MR lately but it should be the same there. > New instructions for re-trigger testing of a patch are at https://hudson.= apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Admin/ >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > > Thanks Giri. > >=20 > >> Longterm solution:=20 > >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term = solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly f= rom jira.=20 > >=20 > > Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine. Any open Jira's= for this work? If not, I'll open one. > >=20 > >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart= from the current status called "patch-available" > >=20 > > Not sure that's necessary. I think if we change the patch testing mode= l a little, we can keep the current workflow. Also, given some recent adva= nces in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin jo= b covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able to= drastically improve utilization of the slaves we have. Let's move this di= scussion to a ticket. LMK if I need to open one. > >=20 > > Cheers, > > Nige > >=20 > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > >=20 > >>=20 > >> Old times: > >> The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine h= udson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira a= nd create the patch queue for testing. > >>=20 > >> Current situation:=20 > >> hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new = machine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine.=20 > >>=20 > >> This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch q= ueue. > >> Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the = new aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin = job on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. =20 > >>=20 > >> Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Ins= tead they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. =20 > >>=20 > >> I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.gr= id.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. =20 > >>=20 > >> The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule= builds. > >>=20 > >> Longterm solution:=20 > >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term = solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly f= rom jira.=20 > >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart= from the current status called "patch-available" > >>=20 > >> Thanks, > >> Giri > >>=20 > >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >>=20 > >>> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows= to keep > >>> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. > >>>=20 > >>> There were at least two slightly different sources of information abo= ut what's > >>> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief abou= t the > >>> situation so comments can be more substantial? > >>>=20 > >>> Thanks, > >>> Cos > >>>=20 > >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>> Folks,=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HD= FS, > >>>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus= from > >>>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new jo= b), I > >>>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit > >>>> testing useful. Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. Let= me > >>>> know. =20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Nige > >>=20 > >=20 >=20 --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAkzjgzUACgkQenyFlstYjhJhuQEAwwpXfmmrtFTIZ5YjBdiCO3iU rK25hNjJScI8Y45uXcMA/A7a+nkshsvf7OJ/XRhpAKh5wvwdzYzDK6UNlgmVBwoA =8PGM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WK3l2KTTmXPVedZ6-- From general-return-2397-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 17 13:54:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20486 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 13:54:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 13:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 80759 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 13:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80410 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 13:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17437 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2010 23:58:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=10.0 tests=ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adamgray@amazon.com designates 72.21.196.25 as permitted sender) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,208,1288569600"; d="scan'208,217";a="662725872" From: "Gray, Adam" To: "nosql-discussion@googlegroups.com" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:57:57 -0800 Subject: Announcing HPC Instances on Amazon Elastic MapReduce Thread-Topic: Announcing HPC Instances on Amazon Elastic MapReduce Thread-Index: AcuETZfUv5NRD+ycS8GZuMD9RncnagBnB/fw Message-ID: <2ACA5D24A0D78040A739A36B5EE9F4B3091ADBB9@EX-SEA19-A.ant.amazon.com> References: <11956009.3016591289774702373.JavaMail.em-build@massmail-sender-na-5001.iad5.amazon.com> In-Reply-To: <11956009.3016591289774702373.JavaMail.em-build@massmail-sender-na-5001.iad5.amazon.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2ACA5D24A0D78040A739A36B5EE9F4B3091ADBB9EXSEA19Aantamaz_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_2ACA5D24A0D78040A739A36B5EE9F4B3091ADBB9EXSEA19Aantamaz_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 V2UgYXJlIGV4Y2l0ZWQgdG8gYW5ub3VuY2UgdGhhdCBBbWF6b24gRWxhc3RpYyBNYXBSZWR1Y2U8 aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY29tL2dwL3IuaHRtbD9SPTNRODlTOVdQWVFLRTEmQz0zNFM0WEtU QVhHTUpWJkg9TlhLWTJVOFBMTUFVR004UUFBQTlXTUoxRTdXQSZUPVRDJlU9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUy RmF3cy5hbWF6b24uY29tJTJGZWxhc3RpY21hcHJlZHVjZSUyRiUzRnJlZl8lM0RwZV8yMTcwXzE3 NTg3NzEwPiBjYW4gbm93IHRha2UgYWR2YW50YWdlIG9mIENsdXN0ZXIgQ29tcHV0ZSAoY2MxKSBh bmQgQ2x1c3RlciBHUFUgKGNnMSkgaW5zdGFuY2VzLCBnaXZpbmcgeW91IHRoZSBhYmlsaXR5IHRv IGNvbWJpbmUgSGFkb29wJ3MgbWFzc2l2ZWx5IHBhcmFsbGVsaXplZCBhcmNoaXRlY3R1cmUgd2l0 aCBoaWdoIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGNvbXB1dGluZy4gWW91IGNhbiBmb2N1cyBvbiBkZXZlbG9waW5n IEhQQyBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbnMgYW5kIEVsYXN0aWMgTWFwUmVkdWNlIHdpbGwgaGFuZGxlIHdvcmts b2FkIHBhcmFsbGVsaXphdGlvbiwgbm9kZSBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGFuZCBzY2FsaW5nLCBhbmQg Y2x1c3RlciBtYW5hZ2VtZW50LiBGdXJ0aGVyLCBFbGFzdGljIE1hcFJlZHVjZSBhcHBsaWNhdGlv bnMgdGhhdCBhcmUgSS9PIGludGVuc2l2ZSBoYXZlIHRoZSBvcHBvcnR1bml0eSB0byByZWFsaXpl IHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGltcHJvdmVtZW50IGJ5IGxldmVyYWdpbmcgdGhlIGxvdyBsYXRlbmN5LCBm dWxsIGJpc2VjdGlvbiBiYW5kd2lkdGggMTAgR2JwcyBFdGhlcm5ldCBuZXR3b3JrIGJldHdlZW4g dGhlIGluc3RhbmNlcyBpbiB0aGUgY2x1c3Rlci4NCg0KQ2x1c3RlciBDb21wdXRlIFF1YWRydXBs ZSBFeHRyYSBMYXJnZSAoY2MxLjR4bGFyZ2UpIGluc3RhbmNlcyBoYXZlIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcg Y29uZmlndXJhdGlvbjoNCg0KICogICBBIHBhaXIgb2YgcXVhZC1jb3JlIEludGVsICJOZWhhbGVt IjxodHRwOi8vd3d3LmFtYXpvbi5jb20vZ3Avci5odG1sP1I9M1E4OVM5V1BZUUtFMSZDPTM0UzRY S1RBWEdNSlYmSD1CVVYwRkFBQ1FORTJPT0g2RzNTRDFXMEhFV0lBJlQ9VEMmVT1odHRwJTNBJTJG JTJGZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZyUyRndpa2klMkZOZWhhbGVtXyUyNTI4bWljcm9hcmNoaXRlY3R1 cmUlMjUyOT4gWDU1NzA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY29tL2dwL3IuaHRtbD9SPTNRODlTOVdQ WVFLRTEmQz0zNFM0WEtUQVhHTUpWJkg9VFdFVFdaTkhWRFhXTlNQSkJQS05aSkw0Q1lTQSZUPVRD JlU9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmFyay5pbnRlbC5jb20lMkZQcm9kdWN0LmFzcHglM0ZpZCUzRDM3MTEx PiBwcm9jZXNzb3JzIHdpdGggYSB0b3RhbCBvZiAzMy41IEVDVSAoRUMyIENvbXB1dGUgVW5pdHMp DQogKiAgIDIzIEdCIG9mIFJBTQ0KICogICAxNjkwIEdCIG9mIGxvY2FsIGluc3RhbmNlIHN0b3Jh Z2UNCiAqICAgMTAgR2JwcyBuZXR3b3JraW5nIHdpdGggbmV0d29yayBsb2NhbGl0eSBiZXR3ZWVu IG5vZGVzDQoNCkNsdXN0ZXIgR1BVIFF1YWRydXBsZSBFeHRyYSBMYXJnZSAoY2cxLjR4bGFyZ2Up IGluc3RhbmNlcyBhZGQgYSBwYWlyIG9mIE5WSURJQSBUZXNsYcKuIE0yMDUwIEdQVXM8aHR0cDov L3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY29tL2dwL3IuaHRtbD9SPTNRODlTOVdQWVFLRTEmQz0zNFM0WEtUQVhHTUpW Jkg9MUlYWjRWWFdLT1cyTUlVWlZFRUZHWFdHR1RHQSZUPVRDJlU9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRnd3dy5u dmlkaWEuY29tJTJGb2JqZWN0JTJGcHJvZHVjdF90ZXNsYV9NMjA1MF9NMjA3MF91cy5odG1sPiBh bmQgd2hlbiBsYXVuY2hlZCB3aXRoIEVsYXN0aWMgTWFwUmVkdWNlIGhhdmUgdGhlIE5WSURJQSBH UFUgZHJpdmVyIGFuZCBDVURBPGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYW1hem9uLmNvbS9ncC9yLmh0bWw/Uj0zUTg5 UzlXUFlRS0UxJkM9MzRTNFhLVEFYR01KViZIPUpFTEdSVFNUR0NWQU9HVEhaRVBXVkpPWU1TVUEm VD1UQyZVPWh0dHAlM0ElMkYlMkZ3d3cubnZpZGlhLmNvbSUyRm9iamVjdCUyRndoYXRfaXNfY3Vk YV9uZXcuaHRtbD4gcnVudGltZSBpbnN0YWxsZWQuDQoNClBsZWFzZSByZWZlciB0byB0aGUgSGln aCBQZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBDb21wdXRpbmc8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5hbWF6b24uY29tL2dwL3IuaHRtbD9S PTNRODlTOVdQWVFLRTEmQz0zNFM0WEtUQVhHTUpWJkg9M1E4SU85QU1XMkdUWThCVFpCUFRBWEhW QVhTQSZUPVRDJlU9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmF3cy5hbWF6b24uY29tJTJGaHBjLWFwcGxpY2F0aW9u cyUyRiUzRnJlZl8lM0RwZV8yMTcwXzE3NTg3NzEwPiBBV1MgU29sdXRpb25zIHBhZ2UgZm9yIG1v cmUgZGV0YWlscyBvbiBob3cgSFBDIGluc3RhbmNlcyBjYW4gYmUgbGV2ZXJhZ2VkLg0KDQpTaW5j ZXJlbHksDQoNClRoZSBBbWF6b24gRWxhc3RpYyBNYXBSZWR1Y2UgVGVhbQ0KDQpBbWF6b24gV2Vi IFNlcnZpY2VzIExMQyBpcyBhIHN1YnNpZGlhcnkgb2YgQW1hem9uLmNvbSwgSW5jLiBBbWF6b24u Y29tIGlzIGEgcmVnaXN0ZXJlZCB0cmFkZW1hcmsgb2YgQW1hem9uLmNvbSwgSW5jLiBUaGlzIG1l c3NhZ2UgcHJvZHVjZWQgYW5kIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGVkIGJ5IEFtYXpvbiBXZWIgU2VydmljZXMsIExM QywgMTIwMCAxMnRoIEF2ZSBTb3V0aCwgU2VhdHRsZSwgV0EgOTgxNDQuDQpbaHR0cDovL3d3dy5h bWF6b24uY29tL2dwL3IuaHRtbD9SPTNRODlTOVdQWVFLRTEmQz0zNFM0WEtUQVhHTUpWJkg9R1BW QkREUUJZWkFCWlhYV1MyTEJNQkhBMkZTQSZUPVRFJlU9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmltYWdlcy5hbWF6 b24uY29tJTJGaW1hZ2VzJTJGRyUyRjAxJTJGbmF2JTJGdHJhbnNwLmdpZl0NCg== --_000_2ACA5D24A0D78040A739A36B5EE9F4B3091ADBB9EXSEA19Aantamaz_-- From general-return-2398-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 17 19:51:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21437 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 19:51:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 19:51:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 58276 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 19:51:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58171 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 19:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58163 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2010 19:51:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:51:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:51:44 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so389554qyk.14 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:51:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.98.135 with SMTP id q7mr4617453qcn.286.1290023482816; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:51:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:51:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:51:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here are the jiras for hdfs test failures on trunk: HDFS-1306 TestFileAppend4 fails HDFS-1503 TestSaveNamespace fails when FI is enabled HDFS-1206 TestFiHFlush fails intermittently HDFS-1496 TestStorageRestore is failing after HDFS-903 fix HDFS-1502 TestBlockRecovery triggers NPE in assert HDFS-613 TestBalancer and TestBlockTokenWithDFS fail Balancer assert On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Just to follow up, the pre-commit patch testing is functioning again on Z= ookeeper and Hadoop Common. =A0It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS= but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. =A0Lo= oks like both these projects currently have test failures. =A0Are there Jir= a's to fix these tests? > > New instructions for re-trigger testing of a patch are at https://hudson.= apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Admin/ > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Thanks Giri. >> >>> Longterm solution: >>> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term s= olution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly fr= om jira. >> >> Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine. =A0Any open Jira'= s for this work? =A0If not, I'll open one. >> >>> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart = from the current status called "patch-available" >> >> Not sure that's necessary. =A0I think if we change the patch testing mod= el a little, we can keep the current workflow. =A0Also, given some recent a= dvances in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin= job covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able= to drastically improve utilization of the slaves we have. =A0Let's move th= is discussion to a ticket. =A0LMK if I need to open one. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >> >>> >>> Old times: >>> The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine hu= dson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira an= d create the patch queue for testing. >>> >>> Current situation: >>> hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new m= achine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine. >>> >>> This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch qu= eue. =A0 >>> Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the n= ew aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin j= ob on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup. >>> >>> Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Inst= ead they want all the builds to run on the slave machine. >>> >>> I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave h1.gri= d.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. >>> >>> The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule = builds. =A0 >>> >>> Longterm solution: >>> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term s= olution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly fr= om jira. >>> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart = from the current status called "patch-available" >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Giri >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows = to keep >>>> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree. >>>> >>>> There were at least two slightly different sources of information abou= t what's >>>> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about= the >>>> situation so comments can be more substantial? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDF= S, >>>>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. =A0Since I've been on a bit of a hiatu= s from >>>>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job= ), I >>>>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit >>>>> testing useful. =A0Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement. =A0= Let me >>>>> know. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>> >> > > From general-return-2399-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 17 23:11:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55185 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2010 23:11:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2010 23:11:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 25269 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 23:12:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25202 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2010 23:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25194 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2010 23:12:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:12:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:12:02 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.196] (wlanvpn-snve-246-196.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.196]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oAHNBLZ4015724 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:11:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1290035482; bh=3gnglGsl67vB9QcWNNOPfm7F3h/WKsakIToD2yFzz/4=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cP6wIIZ3pAoh72e/RyhjUQU3l1u1lZ/pkzQ+S3ZZ6PFRKB+7VRwlcTb96bEKVIook Lb/Cz9l4EZLfxn/StrSaoUCNtqEypo0W9XnKpLhHyNzGK0Ju6LZ6lWjd/ejlf1gAFv Qf6f2FDmWJtoARsA2oFe3wFL3Un2oHnFMcaXIZzE= Message-ID: <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:11:21 -0800 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Patch testing References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these projects currently have test failures. Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to developers who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We didn't turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is the higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This is particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve tests timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. -Jakob From general-return-2400-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 18 00:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1583 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2010 00:31:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Nov 2010 00:31:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20804 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 00:32:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20656 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 00:32:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20648 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2010 00:32:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:32:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:32:18 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LC200DH91GRA680@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:31:39 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011170242 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-17_08:2010-11-17,2010-11-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:31:38 -0800 Message-id: <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these projects currently have test failures. > > Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to developers who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We didn't turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is the higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This is particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve tests timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. Currently, that would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixed or removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS as well) before I turn this on. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2401-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 18 01:08:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18793 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2010 01:08:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Nov 2010 01:08:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 48922 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 01:09:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48841 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 01:09:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48833 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2010 01:09:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:09:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:09:01 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.196] (wlanvpn-snve-246-196.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.196]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oAI18OxR057830 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:08:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1290042505; bh=WD/zQX4BCybVIV8W5JOzst0eHQ2J5Puhmn/0utuVNrg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y+zpk9lmMe9bL45O4ojxSjk+tyuxqp4SkQ7XFYXVu41QR6yFc+uoEqBcu6iGG6063 eU4pSEm1J/w5IlxpvnHP/jeb2+D3/ayj5xVpmcZUigZzUHzK0aFdSq5y8qP8Hf9THQ hFj2CzMRQoxCxD8zwRlYzl6cYBRwJeWEgrrDclp4= Message-ID: <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:08:24 -0800 From: Jakob Homan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Patch testing References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need to be verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson could list which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's still quite a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests and test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot of patches up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple patches. The more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will decrease errors we may make. -jg Nigel Daley wrote: > On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both these projects currently have test failures. >> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a reason to not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable to developers who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch themselves. We didn't turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were known failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing tests now is the higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I know). This is particularly true now because several of the failing tests involve tests timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > > Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. Currently, that would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues that are in patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these tests fixed or removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to HDFS as well) before I turn this on. > > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-2402-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 18 14:54:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79775 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2010 14:54:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Nov 2010 14:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 56492 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 14:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56355 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 14:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15273 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2010 00:22:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Sridhar.Yalamanchili@prosum.com designates 207.105.115.217 as permitted sender) From: Sridhar Yalamanchili To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:21:53 -0800 Subject: Hadoop Developers Needed; Los Angeles, CA Thread-Topic: Hadoop Developers Needed; Los Angeles, CA Thread-Index: AcuGtpnVcmzBGyXzRLeM2lJNO5Heaw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E7ABF95661A337488ECCB8A1CF717278A3A5EF67E6Pomegranatepr_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_E7ABF95661A337488ECCB8A1CF717278A3A5EF67E6Pomegranatepr_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To All Hadoop Developers: I'm a Managing Partner in a Technology Staffing and Consulting firm in Los = Angeles, CA. We've been engaged by a well funded start-up in Los Angeles, C= A to find Hadoop Developers for permanent roles within this company. If you= are interested, I would love to have a conversation with you about the rol= es. If you'd like to forward a resume to be reviewed, please feel free to d= o so. Thanks! I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Sridhar Yalamanchili Managing Partner Prosum Staffing 2321 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 4225 El Segundo, CA 90245 Ph.: (310) 426-0688 FAX: (310) 426-0690 Email: sridhar.yalamanchili@prosum.com Web: www.prosum.com --_000_E7ABF95661A337488ECCB8A1CF717278A3A5EF67E6Pomegranatepr_-- From general-return-2403-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 18 15:59:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25388 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2010 15:59:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Nov 2010 15:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 84634 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 15:59:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84427 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2010 15:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84419 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2010 15:59:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:59:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:59:46 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2066527ewy.35 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Nqybb6u2NOY/cEg0W/POPJ2Kpc6UZox6R4b2fOJMe5I=; b=BHqOIU4C5xsZeynmAv1dNMGJfQwXOLBl7HUWvyvghFd2AWOdKKupEcGiC+sBeIGeB1 YbaxnM918zCjGL0lyv6Vu2C17BxB1GbcRG2bWW/einqznvFDuvRrpvxFRrVj5DMrC8aS /J6CMrSgK4lTWMTTVrATLoVYeZciTh2hnMHNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=atvVGMOuOcIl6ywDlbz/IJwCxEQcUFhILoJdFuKkRAkM16WsqCgk9Ck1yjZPNjqBf6 BAMZpY108EqADHWqHskHlJ8h8X/lp9GpBtTfhHRhTqGMLZSKRJzAGUhwtPtPb8zsq755 8oRNf4agt9c8l7/FXsvxY1uK0X4XaC8LfGgOw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.35.7 with SMTP id n7mr628951ebd.40.1290095965966; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.32.139 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:59:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: browsing mailing list From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 03:28, web service wrote: > thanks. > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: > >> ...because you asked, what do you guys do... >> >> I do http://www.search-hadoop.com/ Alternatively: http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Ahadoop The "official" and only authoritative site for browsing the list would be http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/ Bernd From general-return-2404-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 19 00:36:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16723 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2010 00:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Nov 2010 00:36:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 74582 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2010 00:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74498 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2010 00:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74490 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2010 00:37:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:37:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 16631 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2010 00:36:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.134]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:36:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4CE5C6B0.8050301@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:37:04 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Zookeeper is now a TLP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org At yesterday's board meeting, the resolution passed to create a Top-Level project for Zookeper. Congratulations! Doug From general-return-2405-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 19 00:46:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20677 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2010 00:46:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Nov 2010 00:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 86338 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2010 00:47:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86291 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2010 00:47:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86283 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2010 00:47:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:47:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:47:07 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so4049435wwb.29 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:46:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.140.37 with SMTP id d37mr223001wej.31.1290127604994; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:46:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.239.200 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:46:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:46:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: hadoop-6685 From: Ian Holsman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a2669c557104955d3df7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d9a2669c557104955d3df7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Guys, It seems like there is a lot of discussion on this patch by a couple of people, and I'd be interested to hear what other people think of it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685 --0016e6d9a2669c557104955d3df7-- From general-return-2406-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 20 06:45:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41786 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2010 06:45:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2010 06:45:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 70787 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 06:45:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70548 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 06:45:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70540 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2010 06:45:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:45:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.32] (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:45:34 +0000 Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZJju1f0021wfjNsA3JlEax; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:45:14 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZJl41f0012VBGtd8jJl7p2; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:45:12 +0000 Message-Id: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:45:04 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) All, I've updated the proposed bylaws that I sent out a few weeks ago as suggested by making the vote for removal be a lazy 2/3, so now all of the votes are lazy. As before, by a recursive application of the bylaws let's let the vote last 7 days (11/26) and require a lazy majority of PMC members to pass. -- Owen Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. Hadoop is a project of the Apache Software Foundation. The foundation holds the trademark on the name "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The foundation FAQ explains the operation and background of the foundation. Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If you are new to Apache development, please refer to the Incubator project for more information on how Apache projects operate. Roles and Responsibilities Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following sections * Users The most important participants in the project are people who use our software. The majority of our developers start out as users and guide their development efforts from the user's perspective. Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback to developers in the form of bug reports and feature suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache community by helping other users on mailing lists and user support forums. * Contributors All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A contributor that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of such invitations depends on many factors. * Committers The project's Committers are responsible for the project's technical management. Committers have access to a specified set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion regarding that subproject. Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of active PMC members. All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software Foundation. There is a Committer FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for Committers A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, testing, etc. * Project Management Committee The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The responsibilities of the PMC include * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop project. In particular all releases must be approved by the PMC * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the codebase repository, mailing lists, websites. * Speaking on behalf of the project. * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project * Nominating new PMC members and committers * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC member is considered "emeritus" by their own declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project for over six months. An emeritus member may request reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to lazy consensus of the active PMC members. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to the board for the management of the projects within the scope of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on developments within the Hadoop project. When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision must be ratified by the Apache board. Decision Making Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require different forms of approval. For example, the previous section describes several decisions which require "lazy consensus" approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the types of approvals, and which types of decision require which type of approval. * Voting Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes may contain multiple items for approval and these should be clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the vote mail. Voting may take four flavors * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action should be performed." In general, this vote also indicates a willingness on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not be able to help. * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in general, agree with the proposed action but is not concerned enough to prevent the action going ahead. * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is required, this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes must contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetoes with no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a -1 vote to include an alternative course of action. All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to show their agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For technical decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. Non binding votes are still useful for those with binding votes to understand the perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For PMC decisions, only the votes of PMC members are binding. Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop codebase. These typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the commit message sent when the commit is made. * Approvals These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions require different types of approvals * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. * Vetoes A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that the veto is valid. If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person casting the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, any action that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. * Actions This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and those who have binding votes over the action. * Code Change A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc. Lazy consensus of active committers. * Release Plan Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan also nominates a Release Manager. Lazy majority of active committers * Product Release When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is required to accept the release as an official release of the project. Lazy Majority of active PMC members * Adoption of New Codebase When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to gain approval, the existing code base will continue. This also covers the creation of new sub-projects within the project Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members * New Committer When a new committer is proposed for the project Lazy consensus of active PMC members * New PMC Member When a committer is proposed for the PMC Lazy consensus of active PMC members * Committer Removal When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding the committer in question if a member of the PMC). * PMC Member Removal When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC chair. Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding the member in question) * Modifying Bylaws Modifying this document. Majority of active PMC members * Voting Timeframes Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be made as timely as possible. From general-return-2407-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 20 15:29:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32834 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2010 15:29:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2010 15:29:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 4009 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 15:29:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3847 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 15:29:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81510 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2010 14:42:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awakenrz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=AOW2HxphHhb204iMb8gaznjGf+4k099wdkdMuksGDWs=; b=nHq+ISkDkauNK6Ks1J2gqWDPYAFDX7z19Uw81OjR8WPGclZjasQSmZ9eQMCjxx2E1k mQ5CVnjyvNo6YNPcWSGAJnPDNQjQy0wvyNt36PZ0oucU6OHEalun3aWCmz8tZlJZcAWb LEfzjr5A1lTp3PTsUyjGLKR6+W/M6/jnmPZJQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=li658r9UDKbj4ef0H2egdJrBUZPqxhIMPdR8OUlVPGcEjyXe15ZKqh5Syfgm7ClvD/ gPIKMmzpBYlV9C6sxS7nihejmHh9FHUueWoN4Ydhh3QvyXIvwSJTVCVTzy8bHAVkgkbG kL69CDxpOEv7knA3Eyf9acigItXgc5JwqGDzI= From: Ren Zuocheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: The documentation for startup is out of date. Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:41:21 +0800 Message-Id: <7866CBAB-0B74-4250-A890-D634BB0D1D14@gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear all, I'm new to hadoop and following the documentation for startup users to = set up my first WordCounter in hadoop. However, I find out that there = are some flaws in the documentation An example is the hadoop-core-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar has been renamed to = hadoop-common-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar. There are much more minor errors = like this, which may cause a novice to feel confused or misled. And I really want to write an update for that. Can I? If I can, how can = I do that?= From general-return-2408-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 20 18:43:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17274 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2010 18:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2010 18:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 53877 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 18:44:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53821 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2010 18:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53813 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2010 18:44:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:44:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:44:13 +0000 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so409339qwh.35 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:43:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.233.74 with SMTP id jx10mr3211753qcb.96.1290278632128; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.225.137 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:43:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7866CBAB-0B74-4250-A890-D634BB0D1D14@gmail.com> References: <7866CBAB-0B74-4250-A890-D634BB0D1D14@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:43:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: The documentation for startup is out of date. From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Ren, Assume you're referring to pages like http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html The current release is 21, so to update those docs checkout the branch-0.21 branch from the common, mapreduce, and hdfs repository. The docs live in src/docs (eg this page is src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/mapred_tutorial.xml in the mapreduce repo). First check if the change has already been made on trunk, if not make it there and we can backport it to the branch-0.21 branches. Please file a jira (one for each project) for the docs bugs you find. No need to put every individual bug in it's own jira. Thanks for contributing! Eli On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Ren Zuocheng wrote: > Dear all, > I'm new to hadoop and following the documentation for startup users to set up my first WordCounter in hadoop. However, I find out that there are some flaws in the documentation > An example is the hadoop-core-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar has been renamed to hadoop-common-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar. There are much more minor errors like this, which may cause a novice to feel confused or misled. > And I really want to write an update for that. Can I? If I can, how can I do that? From general-return-2409-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 21 02:47:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90017 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2010 02:47:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Nov 2010 02:47:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 82527 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 02:47:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82404 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 02:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82396 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2010 02:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awakenrz@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.194] (HELO mail-gx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.161.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 02:47:21 +0000 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so1919895gxk.5 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:47:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:resent-from:date:content-transfer-encoding :resent-date:resent-to:message-id:to:x-mailer; bh=CuVCM5VTMfsWinnxL+NvmJd9BYsl3RM7rnfbG4WhExc=; b=km0Zk8nr/8ilMmkxGmCo71dayhR5QQ04ypWEaTtIWgMtJvbNb0LKT4i87ngaMeuRhV J7KqYqb/fNP5tEcAB2U82ASg73iiivMyL8Mb27T7FbyVkjpa783HSFpLfbwDTALoXY8b QQDhj4ylx6a88W9iujpz0XzhCeaKQ23ipmgDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:resent-from:date :content-transfer-encoding:resent-date:resent-to:message-id:to :x-mailer; b=lyZoeGJ02xLK2RiEw5RNP2WYb0n9Tg2tMCAV9awukJMvJKn3e6wOY1/S8qmO+oSJb+ 5NscHom8W40469qT5hFHblSTnZsDVm0V6S01Ghc1cZo5zemWHfYPQ3Bjdw1CqrjIpElV qw6uZZW0KYYGfXmSTGGA+s5ggmArotlVUE2fQ= Received: by 10.150.181.20 with SMTP id d20mr6453742ybf.126.1290307620431; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([219.224.168.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm983405ybe.6.2010.11.20.18.46.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:46:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: The documentation for startup is out of date. Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ren Zuocheng Resent-From: Ren Zuocheng Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:41:21 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:46:52 +0800 Resent-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <7866CBAB-0B74-4250-A890-D634BB0D1D14@gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Resent-Message-Id: <20101121024728.CDE73816043@nike.apache.org> Dear all, (I've sent this email, but I forgot to subscribe to the maillist and did = not receive any reply... So I resent the message. Sorry about this.) I'm new to hadoop and following the documentation for startup users to = set up my first WordCounter in hadoop. However, I find out that there = are some flaws in the documentation An example is the hadoop-core-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar has been renamed to = hadoop-common-${HADOOP_VERSION}.jar. There are much more minor errors = like this, which may cause a novice to feel confused or misled. And I really want to write an update for that. Can I? If I can, how can = I do that?= From general-return-2410-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 21 09:21:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32883 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2010 09:21:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Nov 2010 09:21:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77880 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 09:21:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77677 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 09:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77668 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2010 09:21:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:21:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.162] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:21:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1290331284; l=332; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=1Qwz39x1jRJLo60yBcq66tDtGmQ=; b=wsDEnJBE6J4R4cNIBNS5eJAJYGsLPeSL1djQ9xvfJ/zOR+QRr34nyRIzKq2BBE3ZrRh SxvD1FsKNsviChMfePsNDGHups+1AW0IDunr/B6wPybncclxY9t08BJTUA1BByFRXX+/J XGKU7wuJQC1INj0zc29QBJ56J/Kj+mclQkQ= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjf2AKg+TcRtFaNcoY+nN7sOdsXpAGV4qjhwQA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin-2.local (e180150126.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.150.126]) by post.strato.de (jimi mo63) (RZmta 24.6) with ESMTP id 20579amAL8LOAs for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:21:23 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4CE8E493.7000307@brainlounge.de> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:21:23 +0100 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12.11.10 20:06, Peter Minearo wrote: > Not sure who or where to send this to, but this is for the Cloudera distribution of Hadoop: Unfortunately, as CDH is not supported by Apache Hadoop, you'd have to contact the vendor directly. The vendor has a support forum reachable from his website if you dig little bit. Bernd From general-return-2411-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 21 14:21:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61451 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2010 14:21:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Nov 2010 14:21:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 25333 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 14:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25146 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 14:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25138 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2010 14:21:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:21:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of guosxu@163.com designates 220.181.13.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [220.181.13.102] (HELO m13-102.163.com) (220.181.13.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:21:41 +0000 Received: from guosxu ( [116.237.46.177] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr102 (Coremail) ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:21:09 +0800 (CST) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:21:09 +0800 (CST) From: =?GBK?B?ufnLs9Dx?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <173adea.55a5.12c6ecf51da.Coremail.guosxu@163.com> In-Reply-To: <4CE5C6B0.8050301@apache.org> References: <4CE5C6B0.8050301@apache.org> Subject: Re:Zookeeper is now a TLP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [116.237.46.177] X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 101020(12106.3506.3507) Copyright (c) 2002-2010 www.mailtech.cn 163com X-CM-TRANSID:ZsGowLD7T_PVKulMxk0KAA--.12064W X-CM-SenderInfo: pjxr25rx6rljoofrz/1tbiFBqQd0zBuStGggAAsy X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== oh,yee! Congratulations!!! At 2010-11-19 08:37:04=A3=AC"Doug Cutting" wrote: >At yesterday's board meeting, the resolution passed to create a=20 >Top-Level project for Zookeper. Congratulations! > >Doug From general-return-2412-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Nov 21 17:12:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34417 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2010 17:12:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Nov 2010 17:12:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 25406 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 17:12:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25305 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2010 17:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25297 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2010 17:12:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:12:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of patodirahul@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:12:35 +0000 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so6548181wwb.29 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:12:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+Leq37+dt0K6fO6nPjCQexkZpy0iowZYclhj4gXRUZE=; b=aX5ORWt4IQV1/8SSS6mkg7gGvh5Tbe5ThNcy4OICj0Njl35KNVD3NBF+G/sPy6Ur6z ccYZMmZW9LLLcOJM9CPSe12esdZLzR1cyTM5fDXF2Qyo21rQq/cbFBids1JWpcSjsASM YCyl8mcOgNAci03w5RtyU8mKzRSTtXYOEzbrM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=n5hGpsZCIKUIm1bZL+YSXQlaxuoRiBlEqvEo0A3QxCT0Mecig6MuPvmuQBlUjJAg/b rUqfX0CqsKwjgmZTE11LJQFOkJDHBgdgX87qZPRx4lTsY+8TWKZAMuFyHxXnNKUd0PfX 9l+x7haFytin+Jcl42bYGIHtQlZJ+cfDOmp0E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.141 with SMTP id w13mr790040wem.91.1290359533250; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.197 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 09:12:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CE8E493.7000307@brainlounge.de> References: <4CE8E493.7000307@brainlounge.de> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:42:13 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cloudera CDH3 install on Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) From: rahul patodi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a6bf9cacea0495933da7 --00163649a6bf9cacea0495933da7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have installed cloudera distribution for hadoop CDH3 on ubuntu successfully in following 3 modes: 1. standalone mode ( http://cloudera-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-cloudera-in-standalone-mode.html ) 2. pseudo distributed mode ( http://cloudera-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-cloudera-in-pseudo-distributed.html ) 3. distributed mode ( http://cloudera-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-cloudera-in-distributed-mode.html ) please follow respective links regards Rahul Patodi http://cloudera-tutorial.blogspot.com Impetus Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On 12.11.10 20:06, Peter Minearo wrote: > >> Not sure who or where to send this to, but this is for the Cloudera >> distribution of Hadoop: >> > > Unfortunately, as CDH is not supported by Apache Hadoop, you'd have to > contact the vendor directly. The vendor has a support forum reachable from > his website if you dig little bit. > > Bernd > -- -Thanks and Regards, Rahul Patodi Associate Software Engineer, Impetus Infotech (India) Private Limited, www.impetus.com Mob:09907074413 --00163649a6bf9cacea0495933da7-- From general-return-2413-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 16:32:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56744 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 16:32:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 16:32:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 14203 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14091 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14083 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 16:32:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:32:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.74] (HELO nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:32:34 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 16:32:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.40] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 16:32:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 16:32:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 606122.70480.bm@omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 9516 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2010 16:32:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290443532; bh=CAfgP8rvkh73AFTo6fEp919UyaGyWQ2RpIswaNJURxg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3jqbGIg0RsW4av89LHHZsw88MLBFi8AG+u81Dbi2trZVT5zAhL8d1an0S/b/bBODDSlSvLjHZdC3aSauUtILb9WZGbpNe0ZQRUVn1a4wCdCFsO/HLTMPEi4XFhM4NvUznnJ7rFUPL0MGn5tyjC6gI+nf7ZS/o27J7y/d1UbO1GQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ADgT8IGBlnB2BcwNX1l2IYh5mqJ9Js8aQKI+mfXK3SPZ4CDRRYHhWGu2b6uEexO5P/7zRLQEU0HqXmw0177oj9MU+pidfKmtd00YQO2ZeXVjF9Jh4zyNI5DBWQ2rUBBRoi/AbQMV+PpQHwvKYxgQWaiudHVjzG1wkVH8OljwvAU=; Message-ID: <126335.8536.qm@web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0KLBxmoVM1nyi8.bQpT7kLkaLlgPF2VHwvwq.rBJvmyCRVJ AptW_G2S12XLa7Um3jd5129o117hedkzpptoWTCUBXsZM6QTrwqlP89chuzg AVW8Xxj4tB4TLGgVh0FZIqGTHZ3BomG7RvhrG7vJ374NzArG8ttiCg.oHDqx lndfhdXHbo.b82uCBk2BATM35VXn2Vs8e6VU7oBFMYSXXtBAFQjbA8ksPZ54 YgNIQWA1vuZTXEST4nz7LEW2QNPJwuSJlTY.0N0o3C0nOs90g2leLtQti979 NqlcubHFpZVtGHf0dqsL5kQRcaXQlU7LFP43BvKdVi4uIZoZO.5KuU.xwG1p r_LsN Received: from [129.132.85.169] by web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:32:12 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:32:12 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1891580573-1290443532=:8536" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1891580573-1290443532=:8536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are talk= ing about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exactl= y a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well as= with some computation power.=20 However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of res= ources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physical= resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in th= e Hadoop=A0 where it may should be ? Thanks a lot, Robert =0A=0A --0-1891580573-1290443532=:8536-- From general-return-2414-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 16:42:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61335 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 16:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 24443 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:42:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24382 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:42:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24374 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 16:42:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:42:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.245.208.176] (HELO dm-mail02.mozilla.org) (63.245.208.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:42:51 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org Received: from joubert.local (v74-nslb.mozilla.org [10.2.74.4]) (Authenticated sender: xstevens@mozilla.com) by dm-mail02.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD6B824126 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:41:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CEA9D44.2090600@mozilla.com> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:41:40 -0800 From: Xavier Stevens User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined References: <126335.8536.qm@web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <126335.8536.qm@web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Robert, Task slots are a way of constraining the amount of resources that will be used on a given physical machine. I believe the defaults set map task slots to 2 and reduce task slots to 1. Many of us use numbers higher than this depending on our applications. When picking a number you want to keep in mind how many CPU cores and memory you have on a physical machine. If you set the child java opts to use 512MB of memory; that number is per task. So lets say you have 4 map task slots and 2 reduce task slots. Conceivably at some point all 6 slots would be running tasks at some point which means you need at least 6 x 512MB of memory plus a little extra for other processes (TaskTracker, DataNode, etc.) and the OS. A good starting point is to work backwards from how much physical memory you have a decide how much you would like for tasks to have available. Or if you aren't worried about being memory heavy then you pick the number of task slots to be close to the number of cores. Hope this helps! Cheers, -Xavier On 11/22/10 8:32 AM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are talking about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exactly a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well as with some computation power. > > However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of resources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physical resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in the Hadoop where it may should be ? > > Thanks a lot, > Robert > > > From general-return-2415-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 16:52:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8418 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 16:52:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 16:52:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 41080 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:52:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41039 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 16:52:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41031 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 16:52:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:52:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:52:49 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so1986408pwj.35 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:52:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QrMKIUMO0PYIkUWKABUiURvEvB9qHXrYgN92RdxRmyU=; b=qF68Js2BS0VP88WRJ0QJesnAkPaByQWfLNejN7R23OSW5wMMSTXeffpgaJSDbFR/Cy 85lLBV9HwFHFeaKhrLWrad4YcZ2lbuY2xybpFXr+T5nLS/OkXKyQkkaAzpcwC8gD4jph k0XNqVJP89dR5F7d7rQ7j6G7flNE2SHdGAKeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DjgFDP9OLz9REkS5LbJEsVNhCCmvzuAyDNaGIq84/lXTuyswJM7fL+V/B5lXetAxbo 574D1prwrNzP60N8ddz2koPsPUU8iTobZlEavf07OsHr4+0k5RorCqZq3Sgcw/FHb7kK QDt6QwqfSAnLsi9GOVmAx5XGS07Sy3bnOkEsY= Received: by 10.223.110.148 with SMTP id n20mr4362989fap.48.1290444746328; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:52:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:52:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <126335.8536.qm@web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <126335.8536.qm@web112111.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:22:06 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are ta= lking about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exac= tly a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well = as with some computation power. > > However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of r= esources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physic= al resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in = the Hadoop=A0 where it may should be ? A slot is of two types -- Map slot and Reduce slot. A slot represents an ability to run one of these "Tasks" (map/reduce tasks) individually at a point of time. Therefore, multiple slots on a TaskTracker means multiple "Tasks" may execute in parallel. Right now total slots in a TaskTracker is =3D=3D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum for Maps and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum for Reduces. Hadoop is indeed trying to go towards the dynamic slot concept, which could rely on the current resources available on a system, but work for this is still in conceptual phases. TaskTrackers emit system status (like CPU load, utilization, memory available/user, load averages) in their heartbeats today (and is utilized by certain schedulers, I think Capacity Scheduler uses it to determine stuff), but the concept of slots is still fixed as a maximum to the above two configurations on each TaskTracker. For code on how slots are checked/utilized, see any Scheduler plugin's code -- LimitTasksPerJobTaskScheduler, CapacityTaskScheduler for example. > > Thanks a lot, > Robert > > > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2416-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 17:38:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44370 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 17:38:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 17:38:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 23586 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 17:38:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23518 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 17:38:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23507 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 17:38:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:38:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.97] (HELO nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:38:44 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 17:38:23 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.26] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 17:38:23 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2010 17:38:23 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 812477.55270.bm@omp1026.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 93485 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2010 17:38:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290447503; bh=AJbzeQHd5SGYEJJbEWaz/HvIV+5/xG9ZpVb4WtS2Y0o=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gaQ2a20BAdqrc2DpRK8rZpF4AfVx6kM2OPKDL1wc+IFl474XB+/mF/hORKDntkRzctzLsDUJzytMHtOVAQu2coQry1kZ6QVTMvKTvGPiLDNRzJmNPUOZB+R1s04isKLrJ9/7R/XGuvyYj5HZHPNpcZ4LxFtZg3d+Pnpxk4pgJq0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VLhC6F6HPY+AN3i512BwUShnsUxXyK7MMx/oP7jcQhOpaEcZ414qOMZOp2F7kC+y481uAFU2Gu/OWunn0pazUYmz/AjoAIJRoazGHteUxLwHLmcy0LwivQU7eh1hJ9iY/eBOs1zHxU9h4qVAK+CmgEo4b6mC/4Qy9PZBRZbKcT4=; Message-ID: <405329.93459.qm@web112118.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: iN9r6MoVM1mhnog6wyg3STJyx3zmZO6lGKuVhJQqwFnosDf IbtJbftOQ2i0LYM.9CzcSSwLb9Sj5231egEg3r3BWTIMwIwpxInkUXTDVape MU3vI.akhdCIoB19XpKPx5HrDt90S5sTuuOk69YxeFtRZH4GW0JZCiM1t0r1 .amAVg0u2ChoXEWjble8lwNmzjo6eiyG4iGgkUOOzsOq.eK7QSbMUCOVd.Ip 9a5xLz1mT8P5LPJY2I_fD4yEv87bOsatma9IjEFQh7wPO2hbK84bh1lZkoec CX0hUiylg_ZG8pTnXWtIObRVJkBXNLJ_zeTktBD_apl38U6F.YKa6Cex3LxM x0WKphsWwyo3Q1LaDXQSBal686SkUWvEOm8DSB6o5xpU1 Received: from [129.132.85.169] by web112118.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:38:22 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:38:22 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-288647005-1290447502=:93459" --0-288647005-1290447502=:93459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks all for your comments. However, I still have some doubts.=20 Basically I can control the number of map/reduce slots with mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum=20 but, it is possible to set different number of map/reduce slots for differe= nt slaves ? For example If I am running in a heterogeneous environment, where each slav= e have different configuration, it is possible to set different number of s= lots based on the specific machine configurations ?=20 For the moment I observed that I can modify only on the master this paramet= ers, therefore all the nodes will run with same number of map/reduce slots = careless of whatever resources(CPU,MEMORY) offer each other.=20 Thanks for any clue. Robert --- On Mon, 11/22/10, Harsh J wrote: From: Harsh J Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 6:52 PM Hi, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are ta= lking about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exac= tly a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well = as with some computation power. > > However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of r= esources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physic= al resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in = the Hadoop=A0 where it may should be ? A slot is of two types -- Map slot and Reduce slot. A slot represents an ability to run one of these "Tasks" (map/reduce tasks) individually at a point of time. Therefore, multiple slots on a TaskTracker means multiple "Tasks" may execute in parallel. Right now total slots in a TaskTracker is =3D=3D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum for Maps and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum for Reduces. Hadoop is indeed trying to go towards the dynamic slot concept, which could rely on the current resources available on a system, but work for this is still in conceptual phases. TaskTrackers emit system status (like CPU load, utilization, memory available/user, load averages) in their heartbeats today (and is utilized by certain schedulers, I think Capacity Scheduler uses it to determine stuff), but the concept of slots is still fixed as a maximum to the above two configurations on each TaskTracker. For code on how slots are checked/utilized, see any Scheduler plugin's code -- LimitTasksPerJobTaskScheduler, CapacityTaskScheduler for example. > > Thanks a lot, > Robert > > > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com =0A=0A=0A --0-288647005-1290447502=:93459-- From general-return-2417-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 18:11:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72382 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 18:11:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 18:11:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 81291 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:12:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81056 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81048 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 18:12:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:12:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:12:02 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2998363fxm.35 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:11:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YDytVvJenH5avP0FXCqOPWKZICh4YYw6Ub0wUHQngpk=; b=EEVOlO4y7ohp0L3TIRO4JdHsrZTFy8YjjHZsgdSit8mVYAtJxODXxRm5P+QbvaISof atM3E7py6P1FPm9OJOBpOjrczvpLenkx9XQGw9RE0RpVcKefcKm8b5FmAnpOBvyA/lBZ iizEog3mm1kruen0jSJmJ7oerq3LggE2K3Ic0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=E3BIuh205hpjeZSgeyNdkAElMNqO6FEqSBR3nzLmnWD9O4y7iT8QDN11aC+fqcSVez uZ0wy93Oc9U0scn1MHFTcPNYiRVHkvYdQ5uIcHAYp9Y0NFPXfVWLgFw01YapuAITxFfT cU8Sl0zISOx+bJ6mW9vPzZau3ZJPnb9y0tKt8= Received: by 10.223.83.133 with SMTP id f5mr3616962fal.29.1290449502262; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:11:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:11:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <405329.93459.qm@web112118.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <405329.93459.qm@web112118.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:41:22 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Answers inline. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Thanks all for your comments. > > However, I still have some doubts. > > Basically I can control the number of map/reduce slots with > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum > > but, it is possible to set different number of map/reduce slots for different slaves ? Yes, this setting is 'tasktracker' specific, as the property name goes. Each TaskTracker can have a different config to load from. > > For example If I am running in a heterogeneous environment, where each slave have different configuration, it is possible to set different number of slots based on the specific machine configurations ? Yes, give each machine a unique value via its local copy of mapred-site.xml > For the moment I observed that I can modify only on the master this parameters, therefore all the nodes will run with same number of map/reduce slots careless of whatever resources(CPU,MEMORY) offer each other. Not really, your slave machine's config file (conf/mapred-site.xml) needs to reflect the proper settings you need it to use for its TaskTracker (DataNodes have specific configuration as well). -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2418-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 18:27:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92391 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 18:27:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 18:27:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 10382 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10303 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10295 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 18:27:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:27:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:27:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 92328 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 18:27:02 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:27:02 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2069720pwj.35 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.13 with SMTP id ca13mr7216759ibb.16.1290450453186; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> References: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:27:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 -C --- Summary of protocol for major votes: Adding code: Lazy consensus (committers) Release plan: Lazy majority (committers) Releasing code: Lazy majority (PMC) New codebase/subproject: Lazy 2/3 majority (PMC) Adding contributor: Lazy consensus (PMC) Removing contributor: Lazy 2/3 majority (PMC) Change bylaws: Majority (PMC) 7 day voting period On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > =A0 I've updated the proposed bylaws that I sent out a few weeks ago as > suggested by making the vote for removal be a lazy 2/3, so now all of the > votes are lazy. As before, by a recursive application of the bylaws let's > let the vote last 7 days (11/26) and require a lazy majority of PMC membe= rs > to pass. > > -- Owen > > Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws > > This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project > operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, > who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. > > Hadoop is a project of the href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/">Apache Software > Foundation. =A0The foundation holds the trademark on the name > "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code > including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The href=3D"http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html">foundation FAQ > explains the operation and background of the foundation. > > Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set > of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If > you are new to Apache development, please refer to the href=3D"http://incubator.apache.org">Incubator project for more > information on how Apache projects operate. > > Roles and Responsibilities > > Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and > responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may > perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following > sections > > =A0 * Users > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The most important participants in the project are people = who > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0use our software. The majority of our developers start out= as > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0users and guide their development efforts from the user's > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0perspective. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to developers in the form of bug reports and feature > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0community by helping other users on mailing lists and user > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0support forums. > > =A0 * Contributors > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A contr= ibutor > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project= may > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing = of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0such invitations depends on many factors. > > =A0 =A0* Committers > > =A0 =A0 =A0 The project's Committers are responsible for the project's > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0technical management. Committers have access to a specifie= d > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discus= sion > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0regarding that subproject. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved b= y > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0contributing in any form to the project for over six > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject = to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0lazy consensus of active PMC members. > > =A0 =A0 =A0All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributo= r > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Foundation. There is a =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0href=3D"http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html">Committ= er > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0FAQ which provides more details on the requirements fo= r > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Committers > > =A0 =A0 =A0 A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0contribution is not limited to code. It can also include c= ode > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentat= ion, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0testing, etc. > > =A0 * Project Management Committee > > =A0 =A0 =A0 The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop mo= ved > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. Th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the manage= ment > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0responsibilities of the PMC include > > =A0 =A0 =A0 * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hado= op > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0project. =A0In particular all releases must be approved by= the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PMC > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Maintaining the project's shared resources, including th= e codebase > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0repository, mailing lists, websites. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Speaking on behalf of the project. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the projec= t > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Nominating new PMC members and committers > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the pro= ject > > =A0 =A0 =A0 Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0member is considered "emeritus" by their own > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0declaration or by not contributing in any form to the proj= ect > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0for over six months. An emeritus member may request > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0lazy consensus of the active PMC members. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vic= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility t= o > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the board for the management of the projects within the sc= ope > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterl= y on > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0developments within the Hadoop project. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes t= o > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decisi= on > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0must be ratified by the Apache board. > > Decision Making > > =A0 =A0 =A0Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions requir= e > =A0 =A0 =A0different forms of approval. For example, the =A0 =A0 =A0and Responsibilities">previous section describes several > =A0 =A0 =A0decisions which require "lazy consensus" > =A0 =A0 =A0approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the > =A0 =A0 =A0types of approvals, and which types of decision require which > =A0 =A0 =A0type of approval. > > =A0 =A0* Voting > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0primary project development mailing list > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(general@hadoop.apache.org). =A0Where necessary, PMC votin= g may > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. =A0Vote= s are > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. = =A0Votes > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0may contain multiple items for approval and these should b= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to th= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0vote mail. Voting may take four flavors > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the acti= on should > be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0performed." In general, this vote also indica= tes a > willingness > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0on the behalf of the voter in "making it happ= en" > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action und= er > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will= not be able > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to help. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in gene= ral, agree > with > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the proposed action but is not concerned enough to= prevent the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0action going ahead. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensu= s is > required, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0this vote counts as a veto. All v= etoes must > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0contain an explanation of why the veto is appropri= ate. Vetoes > with > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0no explanation are void. It may also be appropriat= e for a -1 vote > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to include an alternative course of action. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to s= how their > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0agreement with or against a particular action by voting. F= or > technical > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding= . Non > binding > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0votes are still useful for those with binding votes to und= erstand the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For= PMC > decisions, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0only the votes of PMC members are binding. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop code= base. > These > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the com= mit message > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0sent when the commit is made. > > =A0 =A0* Approvals > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Diffe= rent > actions > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0require different types of approvals > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 vo= tes > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 and no binding vetoes. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding= +1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. > > =A0 =A0* Vetoes > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is ca= st, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenge= d, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This do= es > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely t= hat > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the veto is valid. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person = casting > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdraw= n, any > action > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. > > =A0 =A0* Actions > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This section describes the various actions which are under= taken > within > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the project, the corresponding approval required for that = action and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0those who have binding votes over the action. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Code Change > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0A change made to a codebase of the project and com= mitted > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0by a committer. This includes source code, documen= tation, website > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0content, etc. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy consensus of active committers. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Release Plan > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Defines the timetable and actions for a release. T= he plan also > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0nominates a Release Manager. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy majority of active committers > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 * Product Release > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When a release of one of the project's products is= ready, a vote > is > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0required to accept the release as an official rele= ase of the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0project. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy Majority of active PMC members > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Adoption of New Codebase > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When the codebase for an existing, released produc= t is to be > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a v= ote fails to > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0gain approval, the existing code base will continu= e. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 This also covers the creation of new sub-projects > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0within the project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* New Committer > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When a new committer is proposed for the project > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* New PMC Member > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When a committer is proposed for the PMC > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Committer Removal > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 When removal of commit privileges is sought. =A0Note:= Such > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the= PMC > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 chair > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding= the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0committer in question if a member of the PMC). > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* PMC Member Removal > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When removal of a PMC member is sought. =A0Note: S= uch > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0actions will also be referred to the ASF board by = the PMC > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0chair. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding= the member in > question) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* Modifying Bylaws > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Modifying this document. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Majority of active PMC members > > =A0 * Voting Timeframes > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should b= e > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0made as timely as possible. > > From general-return-2419-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 22 18:33:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96278 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 18:33:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 18:33:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 21855 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:33:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21704 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 18:33:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21695 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 18:33:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:33:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:33:42 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oAMIWpFb026971 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:32:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1290450772; bh=vwQoGe/eT54UkhIzBMX+K0ZgGwnf+UdFacATwep9FSg=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=ONmQUKAf0wo/HQq47P1bBAITcMgcATm/eFlXgokeJPr/BVaS7bM8q0BtH3n1yvn9j dg9f1x73XAKnzpQLSRW1tMqdgBCk98Yuq+oKwECaW6u5dgZgX9xOGAWpxzMspc/uDw niqFwOzwRECWPg9zdOk0Z2NCDdN6rMlJ0ewpiuOU= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:32:51 -0800 References: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1, especially given the modifications to incorporate 2/3 Lazy Consensus for removals. Arun On Nov 19, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > I've updated the proposed bylaws that I sent out a few weeks ago > as suggested by making the vote for removal be a lazy 2/3, so now all > of the votes are lazy. As before, by a recursive application of the > bylaws let's let the vote last 7 days (11/26) and require a lazy > majority of PMC members to pass. > > -- Owen > > Apache Hadoop Project Bylaws > > This document defines the bylaws under which the Apache Hadoop project > operates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the project, > who may vote, how voting works, how conflicts are resolved, etc. > > Hadoop is a project of the href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/">Apache Software > Foundation. The foundation holds the trademark on the name > "Hadoop" and copyright on Apache code > including the code in the Hadoop codebase. The href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html">foundation FAQ > explains the operation and background of the foundation. > > Hadoop is typical of Apache projects in that it operates under a set > of principles, known collectively as the "Apache Way". If > you are new to Apache development, please refer to the href="http://incubator.apache.org">Incubator project for more > information on how Apache projects operate. > > Roles and Responsibilities > > Apache projects define a set of roles with associated rights and > responsibilities. These roles govern what tasks an individual may > perform within the project. The roles are defined in the following > sections > > * Users > > The most important participants in the project are people who > use our software. The majority of our developers start out as > users and guide their development efforts from the user's > perspective. > > Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing feedback > to developers in the form of bug reports and feature > suggestions. As well, users participate in the Apache > community by helping other users on mailing lists and user > support forums. > > * Contributors > > All of the volunteers who are contributing time, code, > documentation, or resources to the Hadoop Project. A > contributor > that makes sustained, welcome contributions to the project may > be invited to become a Committer, though the exact timing of > such invitations depends on many factors. > > * Committers > > The project's Committers are responsible for the project's > technical management. Committers have access to a specified > set of subprojects' subversion repositories. Committers on > subprojects may cast binding votes on any technical discussion > regarding that subproject. > > Committer access is by invitation only and must be approved by > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. A Committer is > considered emeritus by their own declaration or by not > contributing in any form to the project for over six > months. An emeritus committer may request reinstatement of > commit access from the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of active PMC members. > > All Apache committers are required to have a signed Contributor > License Agreement (CLA) on file with the Apache Software > Foundation. There is a href="http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html">Committer > FAQ which provides more details on the requirements for > Committers > > A committer who makes a sustained contribution to the project > may be invited to become a member of the PMC. The form of > contribution is not limited to code. It can also include code > review, helping out users on the mailing lists, documentation, > testing, etc. > > * Project Management Committee > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Hadoop was > created by the Apache Board in January 2008 when Hadoop moved > out of Lucene and became a top level project at Apache. The > PMC is responsible to the board and the ASF for the management > and oversight of the Apache Hadoop codebase. The > responsibilities of the PMC include > > * Deciding what is distributed as products of the Apache Hadoop > project. In particular all releases must be approved by the > PMC > > * Maintaining the project's shared resources, including the > codebase > repository, mailing lists, websites. > > * Speaking on behalf of the project. > > * Resolving license disputes regarding products of the project > > * Nominating new PMC members and committers > > * Maintaining these bylaws and other guidelines of the project > > Membership of the PMC is by invitation only and must be > approved by a lazy consensus of active PMC members. A PMC > member is considered "emeritus" by their own > declaration or by not contributing in any form to the project > for over six months. An emeritus member may request > reinstatement to the PMC. Such reinstatement is subject to > lazy consensus of the active PMC members. > > The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair > is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice > President, Apache Hadoop) and has primary responsibility to > the board for the management of the projects within the scope > of the Hadoop PMC. The chair reports to the board quarterly on > developments within the Hadoop project. > > When the current chair of the PMC resigns, the PMC votes to > recommend a new chair using lazy consensus, but the decision > must be ratified by the Apache board. > > Decision Making > > Within the Hadoop project, different types of decisions require > different forms of approval. For example, the previous section describes several > decisions which require "lazy consensus" > approval. This section defines how voting is performed, the > types of approvals, and which types of decision require which > type of approval. > > * Voting > > Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the > primary project development mailing list > (general@hadoop.apache.org). Where necessary, PMC voting may > take place on the private Hadoop PMC mailing list. Votes are > clearly indicated by subject line starting with [VOTE]. Votes > may contain multiple items for approval and these should be > clearly separated. Voting is carried out by replying to the > vote mail. Voting may take four flavors > > * +1 "Yes," "Agree," or "the action > should be > performed." In general, this vote also indicates a > willingness > on the behalf of the voter in "making it happen" > > * +0 This vote indicates a willingness for the action under > consideration to go ahead. The voter, however will not be > able > to help. > > * -0 This vote indicates that the voter does not, in > general, agree with > the proposed action but is not concerned enough to > prevent the > action going ahead. > > * -1 This is a negative vote. On issues where consensus is > required, > this vote counts as a veto. All vetoes > must > contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. > Vetoes with > no explanation are void. It may also be appropriate for a > -1 vote > to include an alternative course of action. > > All participants in the Hadoop project are encouraged to show > their > agreement with or against a particular action by voting. For > technical > decisions, only the votes of active committers are binding. > Non binding > votes are still useful for those with binding votes to > understand the > perception of an action in the wider Hadoop community. For > PMC decisions, > only the votes of PMC members are binding. > > Voting can also be applied to changes made to the Hadoop > codebase. These > typically take the form of a veto (-1) in reply to the commit > message > sent when the commit is made. > > * Approvals > > These are the types of approvals that can be sought. > Different actions > require different types of approvals > > * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes > and no binding vetoes. > > * Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 > votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > > * Lazy 2/3 Majority - Lazy 2/3 majority votes requires at > least 3 votes and twice as many +1 votes as -1 votes. > > * Vetoes > > A valid, binding veto cannot be overruled. If a veto is cast, > it must be accompanied by a valid reason explaining the > reasons for the veto. The validity of a veto, if challenged, > can be confirmed by anyone who has a binding vote. This does > not necessarily signify agreement with the veto - merely that > the veto is valid. > > If you disagree with a valid veto, you must lobby the person > casting > the veto to withdraw their veto. If a veto is not withdrawn, > any action > that has been vetoed must be reversed in a timely manner. > > * Actions > > This section describes the various actions which are > undertaken within > the project, the corresponding approval required for that > action and > those who have binding votes over the action. > > * Code Change > > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, > website > content, etc. > > Lazy consensus of active committers. > > * Release Plan > > Defines the timetable and actions for a release. The plan > also > nominates a Release Manager. > > Lazy majority of active committers > > * Product Release > > When a release of one of the project's products is ready, > a vote is > required to accept the release as an official release of > the > project. > > Lazy Majority of active PMC members > > * Adoption of New Codebase > > When the codebase for an existing, released product is to > be > replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote > fails to > gain approval, the existing code base will continue. > > This also covers the creation of new sub-projects > within the project > > Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members > > * New Committer > > When a new committer is proposed for the project > > Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > * New PMC Member > > When a committer is proposed for the PMC > > Lazy consensus of active PMC members > > * Committer Removal > > When removal of commit privileges is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair > > Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding the > committer in question if a member of the PMC). > > * PMC Member Removal > > When removal of a PMC member is sought. Note: Such > actions will also be referred to the ASF board by the PMC > chair. > > Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members (excluding the > member in question) > > * Modifying Bylaws > > Modifying this document. > > Majority of active PMC members > > * Voting Timeframes > > Votes are open for a period of 7 days to allow all active > voters time to consider the vote. Votes relating to code > changes are not subject to a strict timetable but should be > made as timely as possible. > From general-return-2420-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 03:32:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95944 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 03:32:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 03:32:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 26788 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26521 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 03:32:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26513 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 03:32:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:32:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awakenrz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:32:45 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so2230959pwj.35 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:32:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:content-type :x-mailer:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=n5biZ05/6ECVWbk3SM4SP+7oYjc9hxWMABN3pK+VZSc=; b=CFwAtEp9pPQCdIteAKoBTyMweYds40j655tevbk/o0D9JCi4tR49Imc/IK++jg5XkK 6Gyd4AxbEHKP8Q5mEbSEbKeE1abjj7Uba4m+888rEPJMv1NsdUGkXvcmoYMgReDlRcjb u9aqNlW19SwFxRYaJv79dGsACG2gWHICyIsWU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:content-type:x-mailer:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=bQOhiR6KUx6D0zD3ZFbKQTbKOO7YJEeyTczRF7+jXVqxYZmzn6HXv5CresWPFwlW2R lnTA5bgL+YX+hmJuO2p335BASlJqKRzwxkDvaGnldBDVY9m7lib0a7s384EnoVCxhtM0 0u8hGUbrH4F7r8DZvZ7QlL60jyQ2C1URo1JPQ= Received: by 10.142.166.20 with SMTP id o20mr5863959wfe.382.1290483145216; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.138] ([219.224.168.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w14sm7286628wfd.6.2010.11.22.19.32.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:32:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: How does Hadoop do sort(shuffle) after map exactly? From: Ren Zuocheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) Message-Id: <5E602823-3C67-425D-AE84-F141C5EBDBD8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:29:59 +0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Hi,=20 I'm new to Hadoop and I want to know its implementation better. I was always= wondering after mapping, how each reduce task get its input. It is said in g= oogle's paper and hadoop's documentation that a sort is done to aggregate th= e same key of the map output. But there is no detailed explanation of how it= is implemented and my intuition is that perhaps a global hashing will work b= etter than sorting. So I really want to know the details and see whether my i= ntuition is right. If I can find out that in the source code, where should I= start with? Sent from my iPhone= From general-return-2421-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 06:28:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81907 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 06:28:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 06:28:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 26973 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 06:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26645 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 06:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26629 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 06:28:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:28:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:28:35 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3668788fxm.35 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:28:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y54CurQJ82iqVwMCvkYysISKlQqBNNZK18Fl0GUWshk=; b=gJfSw5OQsIcubenm+nbH1aF/jN0+5juXNpD/TkgXjoUzjAMIMTdI+ltWu99YD7GPcI mlfbFKorfQ0OzoCazLOYQSr3WtTjaZgq/LBA4XNp7qtpMBny9AlJ/MWhGedofEmeZQnZ Sr/Xuts3VNFK1YLRuOq+dYqvggU+EFM0Z4hf4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SoqH83wdeZJUhWbBks1/OZHmTv+mLAUvVTKn27vxm+RY7oME88eVRRDA4rxEjmQauX evl1T3+i9e7CK51mDXo72UuKgMmBHvrLO+F3xu3/N6/a5At2iXvC31AjcHrFZNpNLVya P4SWfUu8Jdb3jL4ggsbDqtOnGhj9+eCdsgbkk= Received: by 10.223.83.133 with SMTP id f5mr4319639fal.29.1290493695191; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:28:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:27:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5E602823-3C67-425D-AE84-F141C5EBDBD8@gmail.com> References: <5E602823-3C67-425D-AE84-F141C5EBDBD8@gmail.com> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:57:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How does Hadoop do sort(shuffle) after map exactly? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ren Zuocheng wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to Hadoop and I want to know its implementation better. I was alw= ays wondering after mapping, how each reduce task get its input. It is said= in google's paper and hadoop's documentation that a sort is done to aggreg= ate the same key of the map output. But there is no detailed explanation of= how it is implemented and my intuition is that perhaps a global hashing wi= ll work better than sorting. So I really want to know the details and see w= hether my intuition is right. If I can find out that in the source code, wh= ere should I start with? > Read the MapTask and ReduceTask classes, and you'll find how the Shuffle is implemented within. The whole process is like this if am right: MapTask || ReduceTa= sk Map Emit -> Partition -> (Combine) Sort -> Spill || Shuffle (Combine) -> Merge -> Reduce --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2422-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 12:18:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54128 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 12:18:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 12:18:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 83343 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82537 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:19:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82525 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 12:19:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:19:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of agrawalprachi88@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:56 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so16655wyi.35 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:18:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9cQieWjYvyZWZpcmU463c94Zz+pmBh4kCVNNp3sOdfA=; b=w/QEZRscD3zVCmYVXHVPcrhHWRQtsi0ng8wejuoofXi6QP8KN6i/5KfirBrRaD2qH2 /wFypU3N4aae+r7XP85szyUvSwp7KSNUrAKYl8MlymDdMhXfTlyo1ZJhHnFfsx2MBIkc F2wrEYjAiwuEabyiGrSu/4USDL4YrsDQbdNyI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AMrCMJ55t4irkqfU9mXV4MCSYTEPNHZtuRNUGGZFck0FxCzIMj/M+DoCWLHt8p2IVQ lnuH6oVqmdbmZMoD4J4eOdCsaAtLTye+NxaXb3xhRMZ5oN/pAecbW0LlDwOM/h3hNWz2 KduoZTiVsAhMx39Db037KGARSByQYjxJpxONs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.79 with SMTP id a15mr7553430wbx.208.1290514714489; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:18:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.145.207 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:18:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:48:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: how to upgrade hadoop From: prachi agrawal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636458f4e2273e10495b75fe8 --001636458f4e2273e10495b75fe8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 how can we upgrade hadoop without any exception also describe upgrade procedure concept i tried to upgrade but got lots of exceptions like: inconsistance state exception, org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed. org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.InconsistentFSStateException org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed --001636458f4e2273e10495b75fe8-- From general-return-2423-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 12:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63308 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 12:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 12:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 93945 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:31:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93786 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93778 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 12:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of patodirahul@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:31:24 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so28244wyi.35 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:31:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jSE08K8RVM6EeAUAaAyoW+dXCfv0yoTnntKWfsIx8qg=; b=O4mzsnk3hKLpAg4EQpltRNKJ7SuX7/o3FFyd0xP5rGycOuZ5tCxQLwOP1hRLWzM+pF pxU20tfIZz89N9J1twwRgqQkROrnK6OctdoSTXvk4/2rIhEpX9367pjNbDwjs1Au8VcJ YHt3AabYK+O6XmeAMk+ZLRCla9LGX7hzxyhvI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gqtZ2IHxavLHWQiZPB+tEPHRCHeuiD3zxEM0LAFvRSyARHWGoWEQGB3L2eZAAY/H83 vzmZXKrEqBtTvF0rnQvtId7FAc5A1ilc3UvLtux8PZ0rID8RjJZ40VkrQbxpMV+2ELCz UtzIYumMliCkTl3Wlyw1g7HXi2cG7pIiHsfFo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.141 with SMTP id w13mr811320wem.91.1290515463388; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.197 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:31:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:01:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to upgrade hadoop From: rahul patodi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a6bfc5bde10495b78b31 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163649a6bfc5bde10495b78b31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have upgraded hadoop from 0.18.X to 0.19.X then to 0.20.X successfully please follow this link: http://hadoop-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/upgrade-hadoop.html If you get any error please leave a comment -Thanks and Regards, Rahul Patodi Associate Software Engineer, Impetus Infotech (India) Private Limited, www.impetus.com Mob:09907074413 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:48 PM, prachi agrawal wrote: > how can we upgrade hadoop without any exception also describe upgrade > procedure concept > i tried to upgrade but got lots of exceptions > like: > inconsistance state exception, > org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem > initialization failed. > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.InconsistentFSStateException > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem > initialization failed > -- --00163649a6bfc5bde10495b78b31-- From general-return-2424-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 12:54:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72719 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 12:53:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 12:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14038 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13743 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 12:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46669 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 10:31:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of agrawalprachi88@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lMYQXVbtK30dE4gPIb5wntweVZwd1/DpGDP+zcJuYVw=; b=lIRlrqL/cVDOc8nuVqaCyfguMXwvZBBQgyXizEp769IOVYxDUdMefgT2d3EtNV2dow N3tnWes91ROrryn5Oqbb/vmaMvRC6SqV62iPoo2Vp5LxLs41EfaI75iOJP68vA67/1C0 GaIcFbXLNv6e+hcsMB+L5mw168ExacjTonYoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=T7GKDZlr70cg9Vri0mqSV8JVyUiyFjJ67KmjlNbCe4/sLkEahCUKR0lZx01Qg5J1e+ YsYwogNafV8ESyeqkkwE+hUDXPcftufl7HVTsfEriItNVk1yOah/KtYsXNANfx0O5bi0 woxlK/oDlzQ1PWokrBoAWvv/+o7ISJwlD9kIY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:01:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: how to upgrade hadoop From: prachi agrawal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636458f4ef122b40495b5de19 --001636458f4ef122b40495b5de19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 how can we upgrade hadoop without any exception also describe upgrade procedure concept i tried to upgrade but got lots of exceptions like: inconsistance state exception, org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed. org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.InconsistentFSStateException org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed --001636458f4ef122b40495b5de19-- From general-return-2425-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 23 16:31:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92258 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2010 16:31:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2010 16:31:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 64440 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 16:32:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64263 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2010 16:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64255 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:31:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:31:50 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:32:08 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:31:28 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:31:28 -0800 Subject: ClassNotFoundException Thread-Topic: ClassNotFoundException Thread-Index: AcuI4vJ0EOl4rWscSaCG1uOPJHhAIwCRpcxg Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AE2C@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <7866CBAB-0B74-4250-A890-D634BB0D1D14@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, I just installed hadoop .21 (linux) and am trying to use the new API so I= copied the example code from the Job.java source... final Job job =3D new Job(new Configuration(true)); job.setJarByClass(SearchLogSorter.class); job.setJobName("Search Log Sort"); when I compile and jar this and run it I get a=20 [hadoop@cala3stgiss01 hadoop]$ hadoop -jar jars/SearchLogSorter.jar a s Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoo= p/mapreduce/Job at com.local.ctr.importer.SearchLogSorter.main(SearchLogSorter.java= :96) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Jo= b at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 1 more I executed 'hadoop classpath' and the 'hadoop-mapred-0.21.0.jar' is in the = path. Any ideas? Also, will the jar be renamed to 'hadoop-mapreduce.*.jar in the future? Thanks -Pete From general-return-2426-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 16:53:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81992 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 16:53:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 16:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 78393 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 16:53:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78197 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 16:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78182 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 16:53:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:53:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.220] (HELO nm21-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:53:35 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Nov 2010 16:53:14 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.33] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Nov 2010 16:53:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1033.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Nov 2010 16:53:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 32177.46383.bm@omp1033.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78860 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Nov 2010 16:53:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290617582; bh=h+Q3rK/nTGKbEk8kNOuYWI8A4vuFjzRzw3ov56LmaS4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C8XexSHgPvEBZkxeLdcDothzDDGVUFXuqCt6nSjr+jacn9NSY6BzxpxsNZOHMufm3FaA/4A3msv08z4t3ry2x6DkilWgC8n8eRGEFtj1LR3dR+OnTmDW7ZLkNXcG7fOp2HrETbFgIS/MdG2SK/nbOnXXhorKI9+7E9DDgfWwZek= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EVVHXjfOnTx5TVR0niI9EDaD18eRufMkhdnK3NN3lQuzykvzhBV648RBMcqtV7Qx5SZ1HfFSgxC8KnrdkVnz3rlmVOYNx3W/pt8vi+q/7+JYk3sV5GzdawaPEoj+UvMtLEyfGH5maxbutX2oTxr+GqsCD7DXmcXWOf+E/oFgNT0=; Message-ID: <636142.67622.qm@web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3dS6KukVM1mbwqOSMTS37QnVACAtj5BAK8LKVBdZbzf.VGr fP78vCP4TMkofH_Vb8x_ZYzlPwSNw43ZaazJZRKsB0Uc2FoFPRmkFI5zX5yV QdEqkXf6knzCcZx5ggzPRklGRRmGbVUm8ym_3wJ5ZRla6RkPqmVMib.LYwKp kIFuFWcHeoLnR47zY.CxzF1AJWn_ij0xpPAMb1ulD.hzBslg.1uMgVmoaIJ5 rmJmQ.RBvqlHJu.EmJhSBP6K3i3KBAEMFw4.azaieGgf23zsHdptqV_vQbCn x91fMb_2iPwPLsrt62TSRijrOLWWTV4QJ3HNWZMro4A8FH.IL0KkCKX4Svo_ z.Z2lEAigVyM.ufMsyiDrOsO73KFqNC7vBDEszQFJc1eg Received: from [85.1.185.210] by web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:53:01 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:53:01 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1656217391-1290617581=:67622" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1656217391-1290617581=:67622 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am sorry bothering again about this subject, but still I am not very conv= inced what Hadoop assumes a slot is. I understood it represent smth in term= s of CPU/Memory, so you have to allocate corresponding numbers of map/reduc= e slots based on your configurations. BUT, I cannot understand yet, if Hadoop make any mapping between the concep= t of slot and physical resources itself, or are just some numbers and you c= an go over only with this numbers.=A0 I looked on the code, but I am not able to figure out if Hadoop really did = some checking between number of slots and physical resources, or just is li= mited by the 2 numbers(for maximum number of map slots and reduce slots) an= d play with this numbers only. That means, the user should give more interp= retation of what a slot really may be: (Only one slot per core, one slot pe= r 512 MB, etc) when configure the number of map/reduce slots on his machine= s. Thanks in advance for any clue. Cheers,Robert --- On Mon, 11/22/10, Harsh J wrote: From: Harsh J Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 6:52 PM Hi, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are ta= lking about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exac= tly a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well = as with some computation power. > > However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of r= esources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physic= al resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in = the Hadoop=A0 where it may should be ? A slot is of two types -- Map slot and Reduce slot. A slot represents an ability to run one of these "Tasks" (map/reduce tasks) individually at a point of time. Therefore, multiple slots on a TaskTracker means multiple "Tasks" may execute in parallel. Right now total slots in a TaskTracker is =3D=3D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum for Maps and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum for Reduces. Hadoop is indeed trying to go towards the dynamic slot concept, which could rely on the current resources available on a system, but work for this is still in conceptual phases. TaskTrackers emit system status (like CPU load, utilization, memory available/user, load averages) in their heartbeats today (and is utilized by certain schedulers, I think Capacity Scheduler uses it to determine stuff), but the concept of slots is still fixed as a maximum to the above two configurations on each TaskTracker. For code on how slots are checked/utilized, see any Scheduler plugin's code -- LimitTasksPerJobTaskScheduler, CapacityTaskScheduler for example. > > Thanks a lot, > Robert > > > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com =0A=0A=0A --0-1656217391-1290617581=:67622-- From general-return-2427-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:04:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90080 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:04:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:04:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1217 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:04:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1135 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1127 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:04:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 65.55.88.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:50 +0000 Received: from mail181-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.251) by TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.9.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:29 +0000 Received: from mail181-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail181-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BED1C1849A for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -36 X-BigFish: VPS-36(zzbb2dK1411I1432N98dN14ffO1443N9371Pzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2ei2a8h691h668h67dh685h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB009.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail181-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail181-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1290618268760859_24393; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.251]) by mail181-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CC2144004F for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB009.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (10.9.99.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:04:25 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.16]) by VA3DIAHUB009.RED001.local ([10.32.16.180]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:04:22 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:04:20 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined Thread-Topic: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined Thread-Index: AcuL+aOoZAv9esjaQomPBeLjodDRCA== Message-ID: <9A758C50-80BB-4AA9-819A-EB4756E8BF45@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> References: <636142.67622.qm@web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <636142.67622.qm@web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com Um9iZXJ0LCANCg0KSGFkb29wIGlzIG5vdCBjdXJyZW50bHkgZG9pbmcgYW55IGR5bmFtaWMgZGV0 ZWN0aW9uIG9mIHJlc291cmNlcyB0byBkZXRlcm1pbmUgdGhlIG51bWJlciBvZiBzbG90cy4gSWYg SSB0b2xkIEhhZG9vcCBpdCBjb3VsZCBydW4gMyw1ODcgbWFwIHRhc2tzLCBpdCBtaWdodCB3ZWxs IHRyeSB0byBkbyBpdC4gDQoNCldlIHVzZSBzdGFuZGFyZHMgdG8gZGV0ZXJtaW5lIGhvdyBtYW55 IG1hcCBhbmQgcmVkdWNlIHRhc2tzIGEgbm9kZSBpcyBhbGxvd2VkOg0KDQpFYWNoIE1hcC9SZWR1 Y2UgVGFzayBpcyBnaXZlbjoNCjJHQiBvZiBSYW0NCjEgQ29yZQ0KNTBHQiBvZiB0bXAgZGlzayBz cGFjZQ0KDQpUaGUgZm9ybXVsYSBmb3IgbWFwL3JlZHVjZSBzbG90cyBsb29rcyBzb21ldGhpbmcg bGlrZSB0aGlzIGluIG91ciBlbnZpcm9ubWVudDoNCg0KRyA9IEdCIG9mIFJhbQ0KRCA9IERpc2sg c3BhY2UgaW4gL3RtcA0KQyA9IGNvdW50IG9mIENQVSBjb3Jlcw0KDQpUaGUgbWluaW11bSBvZjog DQooRy0yKS8yDQpELzUwDQpDLTENCg0KVGhlc2UgbnVtYmVycyBhcmVuJ3QgcHVibGlzaGVkIGFu eXdoZXJlIGFuZCBtYXkgY29tcGxldGVseSBmbHkgaW4gdGhlIGZhY2Ugb2YgY29udmVudGlvbmFs IHdpc2RvbSBidXQgaXQncyB3aGF0IHdlIGFyZSB1c2luZyBhbmQgc28gZmFyLCBzZWVtcyB0byB3 b3JrIGZvciB1cy4gDQoNCi1Kb25hdGhhbg0KDQoNCk9uIE5vdiAyNCwgMjAxMCwgYXQgMTA6NTMg QU0sIEdyYW5kbCBSb2JlcnQgd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4gSGksDQo+IEkgYW0gc29ycnkgYm90aGVyaW5n IGFnYWluIGFib3V0IHRoaXMgc3ViamVjdCwgYnV0IHN0aWxsIEkgYW0gbm90IHZlcnkgY29udmlu Y2VkIHdoYXQgSGFkb29wIGFzc3VtZXMgYSBzbG90IGlzLiBJIHVuZGVyc3Rvb2QgaXQgcmVwcmVz ZW50IHNtdGggaW4gdGVybXMgb2YgQ1BVL01lbW9yeSwgc28geW91IGhhdmUgdG8gYWxsb2NhdGUg Y29ycmVzcG9uZGluZyBudW1iZXJzIG9mIG1hcC9yZWR1Y2Ugc2xvdHMgYmFzZWQgb24geW91ciBj b25maWd1cmF0aW9ucy4NCj4gQlVULCBJIGNhbm5vdCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHlldCwgaWYgSGFkb29w IG1ha2UgYW55IG1hcHBpbmcgYmV0d2VlbiB0aGUgY29uY2VwdCBvZiBzbG90IGFuZCBwaHlzaWNh bCByZXNvdXJjZXMgaXRzZWxmLCBvciBhcmUganVzdCBzb21lIG51bWJlcnMgYW5kIHlvdSBjYW4g Z28gb3ZlciBvbmx5IHdpdGggdGhpcyBudW1iZXJzLiANCj4gSSBsb29rZWQgb24gdGhlIGNvZGUs IGJ1dCBJIGFtIG5vdCBhYmxlIHRvIGZpZ3VyZSBvdXQgaWYgSGFkb29wIHJlYWxseSBkaWQgc29t ZSBjaGVja2luZyBiZXR3ZWVuIG51bWJlciBvZiBzbG90cyBhbmQgcGh5c2ljYWwgcmVzb3VyY2Vz LCBvciBqdXN0IGlzIGxpbWl0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIDIgbnVtYmVycyhmb3IgbWF4aW11bSBudW1iZXIg b2YgbWFwIHNsb3RzIGFuZCByZWR1Y2Ugc2xvdHMpIGFuZCBwbGF5IHdpdGggdGhpcyBudW1iZXJz IG9ubHkuIFRoYXQgbWVhbnMsIHRoZSB1c2VyIHNob3VsZCBnaXZlIG1vcmUgaW50ZXJwcmV0YXRp b24gb2Ygd2hhdCBhIHNsb3QgcmVhbGx5IG1heSBiZTogKE9ubHkgb25lIHNsb3QgcGVyIGNvcmUs IG9uZSBzbG90IHBlciA1MTIgTUIsIGV0Yykgd2hlbiBjb25maWd1cmUgdGhlIG51bWJlciBvZiBt YXAvcmVkdWNlIHNsb3RzIG9uIGhpcyBtYWNoaW5lcy4NCj4gVGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFuY2UgZm9y IGFueSBjbHVlLg0KPiBDaGVlcnMsUm9iZXJ0DQo+IA0KPiAtLS0gT24gTW9uLCAxMS8yMi8xMCwg SGFyc2ggSiA8cXdlcnR5bWFuaWFjQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiBGcm9tOiBIYXJz aCBKIDxxd2VydHltYW5pYWNAZ21haWwuY29tPg0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogSGFkb29wIC0gaG93 IGV4YWN0bHkgaXMgYSBzbG90IGRlZmluZWQNCj4gVG86IGdlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5v cmcNCj4gRGF0ZTogTW9uZGF5LCBOb3ZlbWJlciAyMiwgMjAxMCwgNjo1MiBQTQ0KPiANCj4gSGks DQo+IA0KPiBPbiBNb24sIE5vdiAyMiwgMjAxMCBhdCAxMDowMiBQTSwgR3JhbmRsIFJvYmVydCA8 cmdyYW5kbEB5YWhvby5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gSGkgYWxsLA0KPj4gDQo+PiBJIGhhdmUgdHJv dWJsZXMgaW4gdW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZyB3aGF0IGV4YWN0bHkgYSBzbG90IGlzLiBBbHdheXMgd2Ug YXJlIHRhbGtpbmcgYWJvdXQgdGFza3MgYXNzaWduZWQgdG8gc2xvdHMsIGJ1dCBJIGRpZCBub3Qg Zm91bmQgYW55d2hlcmUgd2hhdCBleGFjdGx5IGEgc2xvdCBpcy4gSSBhc3N1bWUgaXQgcmVwcmVz ZW50IHNvbWUgYWxsb2NhdGlvbiBvZiBSQU0gbWVtb3J5IGFzIHdlbGwgYXMgd2l0aCBzb21lIGNv bXB1dGF0aW9uIHBvd2VyLg0KPj4gDQo+PiBIb3dldmVyLCBjYW4gc29tZWJvZHkgZXhwbGFpbiBt ZSB3aGF0IGV4YWN0bHkgYSBzbG90IG1lYW5zIChpbiB0ZXJtcyBvZiByZXNvdXJjZXMgYWxsb2Nh dGVkIGZvciBhIHNsb3QpIGFuZCBob3cgdGhpcyBtYXBwaW5nKGJldHdlZW4gc2xvdCBhbmQgcGh5 c2ljYWwgcmVzb3VyY2VzKSBpcyBkb25lIGluIEhhZG9vcCA/IE9yIGdpdmUgbWUgc29tZSBoaW50 cyBhYm91dCB0aGUgZmlsZXMgaW4gdGhlIEhhZG9vcCAgd2hlcmUgaXQgbWF5IHNob3VsZCBiZSA/ DQo+IA0KPiBBIHNsb3QgaXMgb2YgdHdvIHR5cGVzIC0tIE1hcCBzbG90IGFuZCBSZWR1Y2Ugc2xv dC4gQSBzbG90IHJlcHJlc2VudHMNCj4gYW4gYWJpbGl0eSB0byBydW4gb25lIG9mIHRoZXNlICJU YXNrcyIgKG1hcC9yZWR1Y2UgdGFza3MpIGluZGl2aWR1YWxseQ0KPiBhdCBhIHBvaW50IG9mIHRp bWUuIFRoZXJlZm9yZSwgbXVsdGlwbGUgc2xvdHMgb24gYSBUYXNrVHJhY2tlciBtZWFucw0KPiBt dWx0aXBsZSAiVGFza3MiIG1heSBleGVjdXRlIGluIHBhcmFsbGVsLg0KPiANCj4gUmlnaHQgbm93 IHRvdGFsIHNsb3RzIGluIGEgVGFza1RyYWNrZXIgaXMgPT0NCj4gbWFwcmVkLnRhc2t0cmFja2Vy Lm1hcC50YXNrcy5tYXhpbXVtIGZvciBNYXBzIGFuZA0KPiBtYXByZWQudGFza3RyYWNrZXIucmVk dWNlLnRhc2tzLm1heGltdW0gZm9yIFJlZHVjZXMuDQo+IA0KPiBIYWRvb3AgaXMgaW5kZWVkIHRy eWluZyB0byBnbyB0b3dhcmRzIHRoZSBkeW5hbWljIHNsb3QgY29uY2VwdCwgd2hpY2gNCj4gY291 bGQgcmVseSBvbiB0aGUgY3VycmVudCByZXNvdXJjZXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIG9uIGEgc3lzdGVtLCBi dXQgd29yaw0KPiBmb3IgdGhpcyBpcyBzdGlsbCBpbiBjb25jZXB0dWFsIHBoYXNlcy4gVGFza1Ry YWNrZXJzIGVtaXQgc3lzdGVtDQo+IHN0YXR1cyAobGlrZSBDUFUgbG9hZCwgdXRpbGl6YXRpb24s IG1lbW9yeSBhdmFpbGFibGUvdXNlciwgbG9hZA0KPiBhdmVyYWdlcykgaW4gdGhlaXIgaGVhcnRi ZWF0cyB0b2RheSAoYW5kIGlzIHV0aWxpemVkIGJ5IGNlcnRhaW4NCj4gc2NoZWR1bGVycywgSSB0 aGluayBDYXBhY2l0eSBTY2hlZHVsZXIgdXNlcyBpdCB0byBkZXRlcm1pbmUgc3R1ZmYpLA0KPiBi dXQgdGhlIGNvbmNlcHQgb2Ygc2xvdHMgaXMgc3RpbGwgZml4ZWQgYXMgYSBtYXhpbXVtIHRvIHRo ZSBhYm92ZSB0d28NCj4gY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbnMgb24gZWFjaCBUYXNrVHJhY2tlci4NCj4gDQo+ IEZvciBjb2RlIG9uIGhvdyBzbG90cyBhcmUgY2hlY2tlZC91dGlsaXplZCwgc2VlIGFueSBTY2hl ZHVsZXIgcGx1Z2luJ3MNCj4gY29kZSAtLSBMaW1pdFRhc2tzUGVySm9iVGFza1NjaGVkdWxlciwg Q2FwYWNpdHlUYXNrU2NoZWR1bGVyIGZvcg0KPiBleGFtcGxlLg0KPiANCj4+IA0KPj4gVGhhbmtz IGEgbG90LA0KPj4gUm9iZXJ0DQo+PiANCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IC0tIA0KPiBI YXJzaCBKDQo+IHd3dy5oYXJzaGouY29tDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQoNCg== From general-return-2428-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:22:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10151 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 41814 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:22:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41747 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41739 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:22:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:22:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:22:36 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:22:52 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:22:14 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:22:13 -0800 Subject: Setting up a three node cluster Thread-Topic: Setting up a three node cluster Thread-Index: AcuL/CJZ4kepYGaOTb6cR2v2br1bwg== Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9IRV1EXMB01eLibe_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9IRV1EXMB01eLibe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just inherited three Linux boxes and I need to setup a three node clus= ter. I've been Googling around looking for a 'Best Practice' on setting up= a three node cluster without success. Could one of y'all have suggestions = (with configuration file setting) on how to do this? Thanks -Pete --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9IRV1EXMB01eLibe_-- From general-return-2429-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:33:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17199 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:33:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 62783 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62680 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62672 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:33:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:33:29 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5371792fxm.35 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:33:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3QAvTEQakhFMKAgqNj327Y5GAcgjuCEyl5bgmy4da7k=; b=V1tt88yh8bTm7rnHhCsUQ4S6KKbTtJFQ1BWmNSHCB/XVQCtqSc3D2rOALUdgjzlyED E36otG7w1IG94/eN1/+ipt4Ts5y1NNhHjoLiJYemsquqTLb402Ya6H+Fsz/d6XLSIf+3 bHOWgQCiVL9aGSmDrHo/zCsm9RQ6JbYkENJy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XgrsJ8lXDxuS5hwHudVx+Oc6ZqYioRZujXpK2Ohunz3SKPHlOJEe+EItj9V+33Lcu+ TgkYbQS2vu+TpdOGiHIlxias82tiSTOQfOIac0OKNkfEQ63GqHedOGb/HKhg1+VQIT3X J0Rr1YuAy7isa1veSBsOzXKdG16wDsUTtdhdc= Received: by 10.223.89.142 with SMTP id e14mr7499948fam.143.1290619987645; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:33:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.113.145 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:32:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <636142.67622.qm@web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <636142.67622.qm@web112113.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:02:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi, > I am sorry bothering again about this subject, but still I am not very co= nvinced what Hadoop assumes a slot is. I understood it represent smth in te= rms of CPU/Memory, so you have to allocate corresponding numbers of map/red= uce slots based on your configurations. > BUT, I cannot understand yet, if Hadoop make any mapping between the conc= ept of slot and physical resources itself, or are just some numbers and you= can go over only with this numbers. The slot amount is the user's homework for now. > I looked on the code, but I am not able to figure out if Hadoop really di= d some checking between number of slots and physical resources, or just is = limited by the 2 numbers(for maximum number of map slots and reduce slots) = and play with this numbers only. That means, the user should give more inte= rpretation of what a slot really may be: (Only one slot per core, one slot = per 512 MB, etc) when configure the number of map/reduce slots on his machi= nes. Yes, Hadoop does not dynamically detect any such thing yet. The setup is ignorant to a machine's hardware and blindly relies on the configurations passed at start up. I usually set M =3D No. of CPUs + 1, and R =3D Prime nearest No. of CPUs. But needs may vary depending on the nature of jobs it is going to perform; sometimes you may need lesser CPU but more Memory/Task, so configure based on your application knowledge. --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2430-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:33:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17328 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:33:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 64055 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64007 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63999 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:33:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:33:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,MIME_BASE64_TEXT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 65.55.88.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jon.creasy@announcemedia.com) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:33:37 +0000 Received: from mail152-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.243) by TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.9.40.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:33:01 +0000 Received: from mail152-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail152-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A8C30824C for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -19 X-BigFish: VPS-19(zz1432N98dN9371Pzz1202hzz8275bhz2ei2a8h691h668h67dh685h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:VA3DIAHUB031.RED001.local;RD:smtp801.microsoftonline.com;EFVD:NLI Received: from mail152-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail152-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1290619965164516_26052; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.252]) by mail152-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2655117D8054 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3DIAHUB031.RED001.local (65.55.171.153) by TX2EHSMHS027.bigfish.com (10.9.99.127) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:32:32 +0000 Received: from VA3DIAXVS401.RED001.local ([10.32.57.16]) by VA3DIAHUB031.RED001.local ([10.32.21.31]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:32:07 -0800 From: Jonathan Creasy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:31:22 -0800 Subject: Re: Setting up a three node cluster Thread-Topic: Setting up a three node cluster Thread-Index: AcuL/YQHVVdS9GAhShiBIX7DtK8Y5A== Message-ID: <11ED1E76-C613-4C3C-A0AF-80CAFFE5D1B7@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> In-Reply-To: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: announcemedia.com T24gTm92IDI0LCAyMDEwLCBhdCAxMToyMiBBTSwgUGV0ZXIgSGFpZGlueWFrIHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+ IEhpLA0KPiAgIEkganVzdCBpbmhlcml0ZWQgdGhyZWUgTGludXggYm94ZXMgYW5kIEkgbmVlZCB0 byBzZXR1cCBhIHRocmVlIG5vZGUgY2x1c3Rlci4gSSd2ZSAgYmVlbiBHb29nbGluZyBhcm91bmQg bG9va2luZyBmb3IgYSAnQmVzdCBQcmFjdGljZScgb24gc2V0dGluZyB1cCBhIHRocmVlIG5vZGUg Y2x1c3RlciB3aXRob3V0IHN1Y2Nlc3MuIENvdWxkIG9uZSBvZiB5J2FsbCBoYXZlIHN1Z2dlc3Rp b25zICh3aXRoIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gZmlsZSBzZXR0aW5nKSBvbiBob3cgdG8gZG8gdGhpcz8N Cj4gDQo+IFRoYW5rcw0KPiANCj4gLVBldGUNCg0KDQpZb3Ugc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFibGUgdG8gZm9s bG93IHRoZSBkaXJlY3Rpb25zIGhlcmU6DQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vd2lraS5jbG91ZGVyYS5jb20vZGlz cGxheS9ET0MvSGFkb29wK0RlcGxveW1lbnQrJTI4Q0RIMyUyOStvbithK0NsdXN0ZXINCg0KSSB3 b3VsZCBzZXR1cCBvbmUgbm9kZSBhcyBhIG5hbWVub2RlL2pvYnRyYWNrZXIvc2Vjb25kYXJ5bmFt ZW5vZGUgYW5kIHRoZSBvdGhlciB0d28gYXMgdGFza3RyYWNrZXIvZGF0YW5vZGVzLg0KDQpPYnZp b3VzbHkgYXMgdGhlIG51bWJlciBvZiBub2RlcyBhcHByb2FjaGVkIGFib3V0IGZpdmUsIEkgd291 bGQgc3BsaXQgdGhlIGZpcnN0IGJveCB0byBuYW1lbm9kZSBhbmQgam9idHJhY2tlcitzbm4uIA0K DQotSm9uYXRoYW4= From general-return-2431-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:36:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18662 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:36:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 68720 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:36:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68641 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:36:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68633 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:36:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of patodirahul@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:36:26 +0000 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so445459wyf.35 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:36:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bu3i25ToIExklkvwF4PD1jME+DsqueLHK6gAEp6RziA=; b=PGWnFAKG3R9tKKC8v6iUuyU3ZD2MHA2D+cpXAikRcLIMcSNcYkhR06iyoe1JUP+zfE 1haaGdqQBDSq1yDOm3dRo3JNxlf+23yRh+YEUKnQ381BdqC0fJC6MUKvcuNESwXrznw8 PS/lyYE+y/wyphbFhtdRhRX1/fz7awsKFMUXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qdBBkl36CrkMOmed9NDmraBX02givW7mPcLgcBPc5stlY0dTVQeu8wBC85wt9aqXF8 6iXiLlecn1NtE33jxptNmFJqQgMKnuOB2SX/P1KD7pkqwoP+3ParpY3Y7SSKzlkoWQ4N vrE3IwCE/wjyqUYQsNbPvv81QcpmtM3q3ksfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.71 with SMTP id s49mr2649670web.106.1290620164222; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:36:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.197 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:36:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:06:04 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting up a three node cluster From: rahul patodi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f19a0e6dba790495cfec79 --001485f19a0e6dba790495cfec79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi peter, I have created a blog for this, you can refer it: http://hadoop-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-hadoop-in-distributed-mode.html in this blog all the steps are well tested, in case if you get any problem you can post comment, i would love to solve all the problems. -- -Thanks and Regards, Rahul Patodi Associate Software Engineer, Impetus Infotech (India) Private Limited, www.impetus.com Mob:09907074413 On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Peter Haidinyak wrote: > Hi, > I just inherited three Linux boxes and I need to setup a three node > cluster. I've been Googling around looking for a 'Best Practice' on setting > up a three node cluster without success. Could one of y'all have suggestions > (with configuration file setting) on how to do this? > > Thanks > > -Pete > --001485f19a0e6dba790495cfec79-- From general-return-2432-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 17:38:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19567 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 17:38:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 17:38:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 71795 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:39:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71611 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 17:39:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71603 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 17:39:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:39:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of patodirahul@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:38:54 +0000 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so447595wyf.35 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LH/gtpE8ZWSaB17knKTOCI7rj/4Vyv/6hMOFSCR40So=; b=o+5QGbjF+IHvhzFDiHb5JVuKes3sb+J/KfDNlCznhd55KgxiHPGN3OUCBFYHKmmrYh RL5xXJobKYY2ltfCrA+lOx9w70grBapoaBog11pqfxboWDhxOuaNVo02dCqXmaBfQbjg pCdjxA3gzG7O904RLkewMqWNy8hYgguZDMtwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lQxDC0/6b8vcUE5NL9yj3mwV0m2XksUUalu2ROG0Ze1OhFxevWRljvsOoTjobzmR19 yPvlGxQbvFUUMheIQO+CKZ+WpfL1gMzBN9Yyogv2RwdYrxW0OkkCK7QEic0yn0QL/J/5 +SF5mSnzG7iLgg/LvHBGwy2i710SF3i2GUHlE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.186.141 with SMTP id w13mr2642831wem.91.1290620313413; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.131.197 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AED9@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:08:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setting up a three node cluster From: rahul patodi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a6bf52298e0495cff55f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163649a6bf52298e0495cff55f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 if you want to setup cloudera hadoop bundle, you can refer http://cloudera-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-cloudera-in-distributed-mode.html On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:06 PM, rahul patodi wrote: > Hi peter, > I have created a blog for this, you can refer it: > > http://hadoop-tutorial.blogspot.com/2010/11/running-hadoop-in-distributed-mode.html > in this blog all the steps are well tested, > in case if you get any problem you can post comment, i would love to solve > all the problems. > > -- > -Thanks and Regards, > Rahul Patodi > Associate Software Engineer, > Impetus Infotech (India) Private Limited, > www.impetus.com > Mob:09907074413 > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Peter Haidinyak wrote: > >> Hi, >> I just inherited three Linux boxes and I need to setup a three node >> cluster. I've been Googling around looking for a 'Best Practice' on setting >> up a three node cluster without success. Could one of y'all have suggestions >> (with configuration file setting) on how to do this? >> >> Thanks >> >> -Pete >> > > > > > -- -Thanks and Regards, Rahul Patodi Associate Software Engineer, Impetus Infotech (India) Private Limited, www.impetus.com Mob:09907074413 --00163649a6bf52298e0495cff55f-- From general-return-2433-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Nov 24 19:17:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95379 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 19:17:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Nov 2010 19:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 49705 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 19:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49492 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2010 19:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49484 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 19:18:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:18:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:18:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 95324 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2010 19:17:07 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:17:07 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so157992bwz.35 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:17:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.122.8 with SMTP id j8mr9313159bkr.135.1290626256770; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.48.25 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:17:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:17:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: FYI: ZooKeeper has changed mailing list names From: Patrick Hunt To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org, user@zookeeper.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Please note, as part of the move to TLP ZooKeeper's mailing lists have changed. If you were a subscriber to one of the old lists you have been migrated automatically to the new (no changes needed on your part, please start using the new names when sending emails). The developer and user lists are now respectively: dev@zookeeper.apache.org user@zookeeper.apache.org Let me know if there are any questions, Patrick From general-return-2434-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 25 00:00:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30520 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 97491 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 00:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97415 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 00:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97407 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2010 00:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:23 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:00:34 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:59:57 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:59:55 -0800 Subject: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file Thread-Topic: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file Thread-Index: AcuMM7F9YvAys4GFSjuC7+MitDKC9g== Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF57@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF57IRV1EXMB01eLibe_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF57IRV1EXMB01eLibe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Well, I got my three servers up running hadoop version 0.20.2 with one of= the servers being the NameNode/JobTracker and the other two being data nod= es. The problems is when I try to run the wordcount example I get the follo= wing exception. I hit c after a second since it takes awhile to timeo= ut. Does anyone have an idea on this? Thanks -Pete [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount /= input_logs/output.txt /tmp/result.out 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process = : 1 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201011241548_0004 10/11/24 15:58:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 10/11/24 15:58:13 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_0, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.jav= a:815) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.ja= va:1664) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.jav= a:97) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracke= r.java:1629) 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstdout 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstderr 10/11/24 15:58:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_1, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.jav= a:815) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.ja= va:1664) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.jav= a:97) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracke= r.java:1629) 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstdout 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstderr [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF57IRV1EXMB01eLibe_-- From general-return-2435-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 25 12:50:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39362 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 12:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 12:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 6229 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 12:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5974 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 12:50:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5960 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2010 12:50:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:50:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.232] (HELO nm27-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:49:53 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2010 12:49:32 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.40] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2010 12:49:32 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2010 12:49:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 298863.58551.bm@omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 76672 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Nov 2010 12:42:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1290688971; bh=htP/cJLNHXIonInB8WulHo3L/ZV5jE+1OJqGxuo74A8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r/1dFwiVqFRa4c58Whnr/Ftis6sb44L897K2F3j7VETsv2j1qii1qifSrsIWbdLVDqMAegfWVO7GhWNb+nEEaFYCfUiP08vp/63sSv48DCjFtT3Y3RmoRYO/oOJueMQnUixEwp+zX95Ch5Ep6f1mCuTMqCqdviQJMe1NVGPg4qk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gntrQriX83asXH9pJ0aQBp/rAnEkXtZEHRgdPxFU3koSnS3qDLRco8YqZsL1S1EH2wCfq+dAx+CBE9zaMOCY6d+lnu9NKeD6Xv9AnUM0keTZxxH3omkXYl4H0VsE9tESyjmectLzMMgzJNV9lVDmYDJJsRRRyzquYyqM52AXZXk=; Message-ID: <349178.76184.qm@web112116.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: wc1T8PUVM1mixOPHBiUZ8CY16ibVLA7qyfOEbId2OW5cZmT 9kJdOwHpfZDLONnUKr93Vb1jzCDe51oxJjoOn3L.IeU8ta02j2x7DXemJakr yHZJk4VxRHXKrgBTjVOew80SOAaBZbQ1THYI1Ea1wa0TnDnKlKT.7m4B3qZs yeICjxjz8DzUgPtbg4SAG5U2P2jHJziQlTb6GY1oaIZy2S2AU6nFZ0w0g5bZ sVgcgFiNrGrtqNJxSHkUJiZM2nCwI2rC3AQDaKAlJWGKI7RMC3QKRupu2kiS .lMr6hEEOUCUf8lrefbnCryDcXjF6nUm7M7NCu9J4f_fWt.JEZIrW0HoXmnd tlVGAzJ2NFiAtgoEvognfRFOIzivoG6xMKgdkJLpdVWcl Received: from [83.79.69.169] by web112116.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:42:50 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:42:50 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9A758C50-80BB-4AA9-819A-EB4756E8BF45@announcemedia.microsoftonline.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1315008215-1290688970=:76184" --0-1315008215-1290688970=:76184 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks to you all for the explanations. So, as far as I understand, if I configure 4 map slots per node(let's say -= 512 MB RAM per slot as my node has 2 GB in total) the hadoop will always t= ry to allocate 4 slots ? =A0Does the node report on the hearbteat that it h= as 4 free slots ?=A0 But then, my question comes: what if another workload contend with hadoop w= orkload at a moment, that means few resources available now for hadoop. Did= hadoop still report he has 4 slots free and implicitly try to allocate tas= ks for these 4 slots ? Thank you again for your promptly answers. Cheers,Robert --- On Wed, 11/24/10, Jonathan Creasy wrote: From: Jonathan Creasy Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 7:04 PM Robert,=20 Hadoop is not currently doing any dynamic detection of resources to determi= ne the number of slots. If I told Hadoop it could run 3,587 map tasks, it m= ight well try to do it.=20 We use standards to determine how many map and reduce tasks a node is allow= ed: Each Map/Reduce Task is given: 2GB of Ram 1 Core 50GB of tmp disk space The formula for map/reduce slots looks something like this in our environme= nt: G =3D GB of Ram D =3D Disk space in /tmp C =3D count of CPU cores The minimum of:=20 (G-2)/2 D/50 C-1 These numbers aren't published anywhere and may completely fly in the face = of conventional wisdom but it's what we are using and so far, seems to work= for us.=20 -Jonathan On Nov 24, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi, > I am sorry bothering again about this subject, but still I am not very co= nvinced what Hadoop assumes a slot is. I understood it represent smth in te= rms of CPU/Memory, so you have to allocate corresponding numbers of map/red= uce slots based on your configurations. > BUT, I cannot understand yet, if Hadoop make any mapping between the conc= ept of slot and physical resources itself, or are just some numbers and you= can go over only with this numbers.=20 > I looked on the code, but I am not able to figure out if Hadoop really di= d some checking between number of slots and physical resources, or just is = limited by the 2 numbers(for maximum number of map slots and reduce slots) = and play with this numbers only. That means, the user should give more inte= rpretation of what a slot really may be: (Only one slot per core, one slot = per 512 MB, etc) when configure the number of map/reduce slots on his machi= nes. > Thanks in advance for any clue. > Cheers,Robert >=20 > --- On Mon, 11/22/10, Harsh J wrote: >=20 > From: Harsh J > Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 6:52 PM >=20 > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Grandl Robert wrote= : >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I have troubles in understanding what exactly a slot is. Always we are t= alking about tasks assigned to slots, but I did not found anywhere what exa= ctly a slot is. I assume it represent some allocation of RAM memory as well= as with some computation power. >>=20 >> However, can somebody explain me what exactly a slot means (in terms of = resources allocated for a slot) and how this mapping(between slot and physi= cal resources) is done in Hadoop ? Or give me some hints about the files in= the Hadoop=A0 where it may should be ? >=20 > A slot is of two types -- Map slot and Reduce slot. A slot represents > an ability to run one of these "Tasks" (map/reduce tasks) individually > at a point of time. Therefore, multiple slots on a TaskTracker means > multiple "Tasks" may execute in parallel. >=20 > Right now total slots in a TaskTracker is =3D=3D > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum for Maps and > mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum for Reduces. >=20 > Hadoop is indeed trying to go towards the dynamic slot concept, which > could rely on the current resources available on a system, but work > for this is still in conceptual phases. TaskTrackers emit system > status (like CPU load, utilization, memory available/user, load > averages) in their heartbeats today (and is utilized by certain > schedulers, I think Capacity Scheduler uses it to determine stuff), > but the concept of slots is still fixed as a maximum to the above two > configurations on each TaskTracker. >=20 > For code on how slots are checked/utilized, see any Scheduler plugin's > code -- LimitTasksPerJobTaskScheduler, CapacityTaskScheduler for > example. >=20 >>=20 >> Thanks a lot, >> Robert >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Harsh J > www.harshj.com >=20 >=20 >=20 =0A=0A=0A --0-1315008215-1290688970=:76184-- From general-return-2436-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 25 13:00:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41650 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 13:00:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 13:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 16038 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 13:00:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15793 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 13:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15785 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2010 13:00:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:00:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:00:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812B9B7DFB for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:00:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r9gGaF+0qO3Y for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:00:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79533B7DFA for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:00:05 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1291294791.38448@i61CsaN1lv/5BGDE3gPDJw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id oAPCxoND005905 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:59:50 GMT Message-ID: <4CEE5DC6.3080505@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:59:50 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop - how exactly is a slot defined References: <349178.76184.qm@web112116.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <349178.76184.qm@web112116.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: oAPCxoND005905 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 25/11/10 12:42, Grandl Robert wrote: > Thanks to you all for the explanations. > So, as far as I understand, if I configure 4 map slots per node(let's say - 512 MB RAM per slot as my node has 2 GB in total) the hadoop will always try to allocate 4 slots ? Does the node report on the hearbteat that it has 4 free slots ? > But then, my question comes: what if another workload contend with hadoop workload at a moment, that means few resources available now for hadoop. Did hadoop still report he has 4 slots free and implicitly try to allocate tasks for these 4 slots ? Do you mean other system workload? Are your machines accepting work from other places? The JobTracker will push out work to the nodes, and remember which machines it has given work to -so won't overcommit them. If you are doing other work on the same machine, it won't know about that, and still push out jobs that will now take longer. -steve From general-return-2437-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Nov 25 19:18:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25075 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2010 19:18:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Nov 2010 19:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24976 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 19:18:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24883 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2010 19:18:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24868 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2010 19:18:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:18:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:18:35 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:18:11 +0100 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:18:11 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" , "'hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:16:10 +0100 Subject: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Topic: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Index: AcuM1Tff1f0m01iZSCSfczKa4w4r/Q== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018F_01CB8CDD.99FC9740" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01CB8CDD.99FC9740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi list, We're considering to provide our users with FTP and WebDAV interfaces (with software provided here: http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/). These both support user accounts, so we'll be able to deal with authentication. We're evaluating Cloudera's Hue, which we have coupled to our LDAP service for authentication, as an interface to MapReduce. These solutions are not the most beautiful in terms of authentication. We'd much prefer to use Kerberos as provided by Y!. But if we do so, how will we enable users to get data from the outside world onto HDFS? How do others provide secure but easy interfaces to HDFS? Kind regards, Evert Lammerts ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01CB8CDD.99FC9740 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMTEyNTE5MTYxMFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFI+tI3hl uUblaAZpEQaMey3TLc5YMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAoO1lO2+SGUgAoI//eyUw/oEJoOGbM18AnABBP2dSDpKkc+qE5MI37S1BOcUIQYD53Nh5+Qxg kR+xy1++bAkXtroGiQoPGMfeasApYmLV/sGAFCOMfV8DNwQQM2PR8RMC+qakeqx1S5Qq75rHrZYi tVgkmv7aEYXVzNSKff7FNt2y+n+2GQlZFvYCTkj+VMGuZPK1aXqdGGM8nWo/64wuUE+/V2cbfioj c+d/DPCNZm3LseUBFJWntqk4n37Dli7iTdlSuf4ylEfkxPhZrInKHuAbSG+Io38R1mlT734cqMpH bA8rRnUt5hIesCLWeyaAC4ld3qkm4mPelVqaGiQW1wAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01CB8CDD.99FC9740-- From general-return-2438-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 26 05:52:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84903 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 05:52:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 05:52:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 37276 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 05:52:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37061 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 05:52:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37053 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 05:52:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:52:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kiddlee1989@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:52:09 +0000 Received: by qwd7 with SMTP id 7so415488qwd.35 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Yig7OkVP0Z4qKKo3GowmURx+2cxO2uvCFQjJsoG4CmI=; b=eyW0P7NbRkeGOx9aYTxoHCqC6rXSH73+SAP2tRneVmv4kRDqMW5l8OTOb2zOHeihgZ /CzWvFzcSXpYe/Mo69149jjvOblAOkSiVvKU9w5P/mFjcKVZcgvSrrWCzcWe7UTwZ803 Vta/XUVdra6S0vrw3XOKcN50Wb3wQi8/O6UGs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=f0Yt6Fk3irP7zcZ5NLspz8CC2EuSwMYpyv9R80RW02uYAqN4YwOMk8s64cU9gGqlOh k2h984wJrkEZXNOyD71+vEGgstoOpucEOaCtepVucOgLP+9XU8j/7ruzCUNvwu3BfWq3 /97LdoUg28kcxTV8aLy1TLLx3FKKkdI7faZZI= Received: by 10.229.246.145 with SMTP id ly17mr1511460qcb.11.1290750708544; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:51:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.128.136 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:51:28 -0800 (PST) From: kiddlee Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:51:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: test To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f80ea479f74c0495ee5122 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f80ea479f74c0495ee5122 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 test -- yours sincerely, kiddlee --001485f80ea479f74c0495ee5122-- From general-return-2439-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Nov 26 21:13:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44939 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 21:13:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 21:13:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29201 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 21:13:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28715 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 21:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28701 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 21:13:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:13:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:13:48 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so190689iwn.35 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.144.21 with SMTP id x21mr2041407ibu.126.1290806005359; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:13:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.58.205 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:12:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Vinithra Varadharajan Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:12:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos To: general@hadoop.apache.org, Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl Cc: "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" , Hue-Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64761da6c648f0495fb3188 --0016e64761da6c648f0495fb3188 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 + Hue-user mailing list Hi Evert, Which version of Hue and CDH are you using? CDH3b3 includes Yahoo's security patches, which provide Kerberos authentication. In CDH3b3, we have made changes to Hue's filebrowser application, which provides an interface to upload data into HDFS, so that it works with Hadoop's authentication. Is this similar to what you're looking for? Thanks, Vinithra On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > Hi list, > > We're considering to provide our users with FTP and WebDAV interfaces (with > software provided here: http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/). These both > support > user accounts, so we'll be able to deal with authentication. We're > evaluating Cloudera's Hue, which we have coupled to our LDAP service for > authentication, as an interface to MapReduce. > > These solutions are not the most beautiful in terms of authentication. We'd > much prefer to use Kerberos as provided by Y!. But if we do so, how will we > enable users to get data from the outside world onto HDFS? How do others > provide secure but easy interfaces to HDFS? > > Kind regards, > Evert Lammerts > > --0016e64761da6c648f0495fb3188-- From general-return-2440-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 27 05:58:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15306 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 05:58:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 05:58:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 56754 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 05:58:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56484 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 05:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56475 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2010 05:58:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:58:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:58:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 15279 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2010 05:57:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:57:55 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2673661bwz.35 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:57:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.113.131 with SMTP id a3mr2647363bkq.123.1290837473203; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.162.196 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:57:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> References: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:57:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d785980d985c049602852e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d785980d985c049602852e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The bylaws pass with 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes. -- Owen --0016e6d785980d985c049602852e-- From general-return-2441-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 27 06:24:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31704 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 06:24:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 06:24:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 64089 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 06:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63815 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 06:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63807 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2010 06:24:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 06:24:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 06:24:32 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.20.10.2] ([166.205.138.154]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LCJ006MW5RRI500@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:23:54 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1011260191 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-11-26_11:2010-11-26,2010-11-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:23:51 -0800 Message-id: References: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Finally got some time to review this in detail. I don't understand these 2: 1) [snip] > * Approvals > > These are the types of approvals that can be sought. Different actions > require different types of approvals > > * Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes > and no binding vetoes. [snip] > * Actions > > This section describes the various actions which are undertaken within > the project, the corresponding approval required for that action and > those who have binding votes over the action. > > * Code Change > > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed > by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website > content, etc. > > Lazy consensus of active committers. Is the intention then that all code changes need an explicit +1 from 3 committers? That's what this bylaw says. 2) > * Modifying Bylaws > > Modifying this document. > > Majority of active PMC members Was this intended to be lazy majority? You stated that 'all votes are lazy' but this one is not. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2442-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Nov 27 11:30:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13601 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2010 11:30:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2010 11:30:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 58407 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 11:30:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58205 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2010 11:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58190 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2010 11:30:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:30:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.49] (HELO smtp.sara.nl) (145.100.8.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:29:54 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.32) by sara-exch-fe1.ka.sara.nl (145.100.8.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:29:33 +0100 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:29:12 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: Vinithra Varadharajan , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" , Hue-Users Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:29:11 +0100 Subject: RE: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Topic: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Index: AcuNrsrXyhcorlqwRB2lpoaN711T7gAdELnb Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Vinithra, others, We are using CDH3b3 (which works amazingly well!!). And it's nice see Y!'s = Kerberos solution coupled to HDFS. But I wouldn't use Hue to upload a set o= f files accumulating to 100's of GBs or a number of TB's. Browser-based app= lications are not suitable for that, in my experience. Do you have differen= t experiences with Hue? (To be fair, we haven't tested its performance yet.= ) We are setting up a cluster that will be shared by people from a number of = different institutes, all working on different cases with different data. T= heir work and data should be protected, also from each other. At the same t= ime they need to be able to transfer their data onto HDFS (with a high enou= gh throughput) from their local clusters / machines. Is there a standard th= at others are using and that works for shared clusters? How are Y! people g= etting their data onto HDFS? Right now we are using SFTP. We handle authentication a bit 'hacky', but it= works: we've coupled our LDAP server to Hue through an Auth*Handler, which= also allows for executing a script that updates authentication tokens for = our FTP. So far the throughput is far from high enough though - 1.5 MB/s - = with data going over the line unencrypted. Unless we can get that up signif= icantly, while providing the option to encrypt the data on the wire, that w= ill probably not be a long term solution. If anybody can share experiences on transparently and securely getting data= onto HDFS from external locations, that would be much appreciated! Cheers, Evert ________________________________________ From: Vinithra Varadharajan [vinithra@cloudera.com] Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:12 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; Evert Lammerts Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hue-Users Subject: Re: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos + Hue-user mailing list Hi Evert, Which version of Hue and CDH are you using? CDH3b3 includes Yahoo's securit= y patches, which provide Kerberos authentication. In CDH3b3, we have made c= hanges to Hue's filebrowser application, which provides an interface to upl= oad data into HDFS, so that it works with Hadoop's authentication. Is this = similar to what you're looking for? Thanks, Vinithra On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Evert Lammerts > wrote: Hi list, We're considering to provide our users with FTP and WebDAV interfaces (with software provided here: http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/). These both support user accounts, so we'll be able to deal with authentication. We're evaluating Cloudera's Hue, which we have coupled to our LDAP service for authentication, as an interface to MapReduce. These solutions are not the most beautiful in terms of authentication. We'd much prefer to use Kerberos as provided by Y!. But if we do so, how will we enable users to get data from the outside world onto HDFS? How do others provide secure but easy interfaces to HDFS? Kind regards, Evert Lammerts From general-return-2443-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 05:04:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4824 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 05:04:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 05:04:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 80696 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 05:03:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80393 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 05:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80367 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 05:03:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:03:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:03:48 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id oAT52sdF045731; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:02:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291006975; bh=mhfwvQQd7pUnlMenK+J5lttDIx05eOJhW3LGXhBEyl0=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=acCSP0XLlQamRrwYCVYKT+5UWi3QJCcnXVilsxaGvqyps+50Ugjm3vrd0f4aSx9TJ 9s4c0OmRA+KoeKE8mQm/YEV80+3tVhFMQKn6ZpOnP7Zlu9wSB1WAy7xsIj4nHgFyi+ n8TWrPFPBE/pgeDc3vl2yvIyoaRknQcsoBev16JM= Received: from EGL-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.206]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:32:54 +0530 From: Venkatesh S To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:32:46 +0530 Subject: Re: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Topic: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Index: AcuM1Tff1f0m01iZSCSfczKa4w4r/QCrXF5L Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We use HDFS Proxy which is part of contrib. The new version yet to be released has both R+W and supports SPNEGO (Kerberos over HTTP). Its been working well for us. Thanks, Venkatesh On 11/26/10 12:46 AM, "Evert Lammerts" wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > We're considering to provide our users with FTP and WebDAV interfaces (wi= th > software provided here: http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/). These both suppo= rt > user accounts, so we'll be able to deal with authentication. We're > evaluating Cloudera's Hue, which we have coupled to our LDAP service for > authentication, as an interface to MapReduce. >=20 > These solutions are not the most beautiful in terms of authentication. We= 'd > much prefer to use Kerberos as provided by Y!. But if we do so, how will = we > enable users to get data from the outside world onto HDFS? How do others > provide secure but easy interfaces to HDFS? >=20 > Kind regards, > Evert Lammerts >=20 From general-return-2444-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 16:16:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26172 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 16:16:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 16:16:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 17779 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 16:16:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17513 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 16:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17501 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 16:16:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:16:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:15:56 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:16:06 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:15:34 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:15:34 -0800 Subject: HELP PLEASE - java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file Thread-Topic: HELP PLEASE - java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file Thread-Index: AcuP4KbC8OPZtJ1PR0WyZFENNIYUGA== Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86IRV1EXMB01eLibe_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86IRV1EXMB01eLibe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Well, I got my three servers up running hadoop version 0.20.2 with one of= the servers being the NameNode/JobTracker and the other two being data nod= es. The problems is when I try to run the wordcount example I get the follo= wing exception. I hit c after a second since it takes awhile to timeo= ut. Does anyone have an idea on this? Thanks -Pete [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount /= input_logs/output.txt /tmp/result.out 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process = : 1 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201011241548_0004 10/11/24 15:58:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 10/11/24 15:58:13 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_0, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_0004_= m_000009_0: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.jav= a:815) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.ja= va:1664) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.jav= a:97) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracke= r.java:1629) 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstdout 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstderr 10/11/24 15:58:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_1, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_0004_= m_000009_1: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.jav= a:815) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.ja= va:1664) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.jav= a:97) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracke= r.java:1629) 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstdout 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://ca= iss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid=3Da= ttempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstderr [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ --_000_321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86IRV1EXMB01eLibe_-- From general-return-2445-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 17:58:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12696 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 17:58:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 17:58:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 73741 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 17:58:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73545 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 17:58:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73537 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 17:58:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:58:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dsikar@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:57:56 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2624736yxm.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:57:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KYR4ja8Mm4Lv/sLyPzTN4z10zUKFe1M5fQGDVLEh++Y=; b=RfmRuUM17Y8VVg1RSSSqdgri7kZ5PK0MnsrzHWPQrKdDEvGY/5zvSRX+H7D2neq/H2 0T7s1sA8SEbPEfSEUlHypHGorj26wykzSvpoqLF/H1w6eaqUsMD+J6xQyJOJeUdis0n4 kQShnhUyyj/9C0LWM0FZXWxPjYil7h0xYwzGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Odrulrgczw8fwMnRZKSNzFKdMt5YztuGSL4n5APMLNitOZ1S2mUCsaTPZo5nOltRtM N1sY+6sO5mSlPJylmnPafiyEDPhUlrDRBZnmsaev1e/ka7ELrIWlA9Wt6skiTM6zC3XL S/NcplzbIZ66nsuruu+AvUmTN+CsuTVfHFO8U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.98.12 with SMTP id v12mr6088860agb.109.1291053455625; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.62.15 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:57:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCB2AF86@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:57:35 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HELP PLEASE - java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file From: daniel sikar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have you checked if the output folder /tmp was created in HDFS? If yes, that could be at least one issue. Make sure the output folder does not exist in HDFS before running the job. On 29 November 2010 16:15, Peter Haidinyak wrote: > Hi, > > =A0Well, I got my three servers up running hadoop version 0.20.2 with one= of the servers being the NameNode/JobTracker and the other two being data = nodes. The problems is when I try to run the wordcount example I get the fo= llowing exception. I hit c after a second since it takes awhile to ti= meout. > > Does anyone have an idea on this? > > > > Thanks > > > > -Pete > > > > [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ hadoop jar hadoop-0.20.2-examples.jar wordcount= /input_logs/output.txt /tmp/result.out > > 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO input.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to proces= s : 1 > > 10/11/24 15:58:09 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201011241548_00= 04 > > 10/11/24 15:58:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0map 0% reduce 0% > > 10/11/24 15:58:13 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_0= 004_m_000009_0, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_0: > > java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTr= acker.java:815) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskT= racker.java:1664) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTr= acker.java:97) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(T= askTracker.java:1629) > > > > 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://= caiss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid= =3Dattempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstdout > > 10/11/24 15:58:13 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://= caiss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid= =3Dattempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_0&filter=3Dstderr > > 10/11/24 15:58:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201011241548_0= 004_m_000009_1, Status : FAILED Error initializing attempt_201011241548_000= 4_m_000009_1: > > java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:133) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.util.jar.JarFile.(JarFile.java:97) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.unJar(RunJar.java:36) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTr= acker.java:815) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskT= racker.java:1664) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTr= acker.java:97) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(T= askTracker.java:1629) > > > > 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://= caiss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid= =3Dattempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstdout > > 10/11/24 15:58:16 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp://= caiss01b.epilotcolo.eliberation.com:50060/tasklog?plaintext=3Dtrue&taskid= =3Dattempt_201011241548_0004_m_000009_1&filter=3Dstderr > > [hadoop@caiss01a hadoop]$ > > From general-return-2446-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 19:20:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80307 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 19:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 19:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 14858 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:20:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14785 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14777 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 19:20:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:20:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:20:15 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id d0FA1f0021swQuc567KuZx; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:19:54 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id d7Kl1f00K2SbwD53b7KoPZ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:19:52 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop Bylaws Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:19:44 -0800 References: <270521A0-A54F-4482-8A36-ABD6FB5ECD96@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Is the intention then that all code changes need an explicit +1 from > 3 committers? That's what this bylaw says. You're right. That slipped through. I'll start a vote to amend it. > Was this intended to be lazy majority? You stated that 'all votes > are lazy' but this one is not. You're right again. I'll include that too. -- Owen From general-return-2447-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 19:32:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84426 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 19:32:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 19:32:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 33441 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:32:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33338 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:32:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33330 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 19:32:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:26 +0000 Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id d58x1f0020mv7h0537Y6cU; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:06 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id d7Xu1f00B2SbwD53X7XxRp; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:01 +0000 Message-Id: <159E99C4-B71C-437E-9640-AA24C50D636E@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [DISCUSS] clarifying the bylaws Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:31:52 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) As Nigel pointed out, the bylaws didn't match the discussion. Here is a proposed patch. *** bylaws.txt 2010-11-29 11:26:53.000000000 -0800 --- bylaws2.txt 2010-11-29 11:20:05.000000000 -0800 *************** *** 207,214 **** by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc. ! Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of ! one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1. * Release Plan --- 207,213 ---- by a committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc. ! Lazy consensus of active committers. * Release Plan *************** *** 269,275 **** Modifying this document. ! Lazy majority of active PMC members * Voting Timeframes --- 268,274 ---- Modifying this document. ! Majority of active PMC members * Voting Timeframes From general-return-2448-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 19:57:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98799 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 19:57:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 19:57:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 74538 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74484 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 19:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74476 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 19:57:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:57:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of b.aravinth@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:56:56 +0000 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so5188916wyf.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:56:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9aGaNugrxXnUiLLGYYiRhJU5JO7cbV+fluD97iyYDEw=; b=YAu0vDBYo0SX1XrH1UruMAy9oGLOd6m3jtC3nPUnQiKWLvoMNM1tnSSaI1okp8h+dV 5WIIn/+2cBQNZnUdwEjYqGDfWjtL0Pb+02BVtIwDAHgtWw7V403VZM+Iul/ArBei9H6e iihcUY7NNdvkhIreiZgES3wfKAfmfVbsIK2qI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JndS3eEszbKtLqhGnFyaZoyrLNHKlxzYG3imawk91WhM252knzD/DFB68qrHMHV9nC ix+jUd4ZJdnacdzx5yOHw1yFNevQk/thF+NBurn/FoNP1hdfcGeGjBpfykl9UQiSrVfD TVH6e4c7FTaP6MLdEWQqsKDhnkadaLw7r/3Wc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.164.194 with SMTP id c44mr5808443wel.107.1291060595574; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:56:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.86.203 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:56:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop From: Aravinth Bheemaraj To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364267352ecf810496367818 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364267352ecf810496367818 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am a beginner to Hadoop and I am looking for some help in implementing the Mapper with an image as input. Is there any predefined Writable class for processing image? If so, how do I use it? Also I have read somewhere that compressed formats cannot be processed in Hadoop. If this is true, am I making any sense in saying that the JPEG images (which are also compressed format) cannot be processed by Hadoop? Please correct me if I have misunderstood this concept. Thanks, -- Aravinth --0016364267352ecf810496367818-- From general-return-2449-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 21:09:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51611 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 21:09:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 21:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 74022 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 21:09:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73979 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 21:09:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73971 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 21:09:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:09:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.15] (HELO col0-omc1-s5.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:08:57 +0000 Received: from COL117-W39 ([65.55.34.7]) by col0-omc1-s5.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:08:37 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_2daace45-fdbb-4bec-a74d-ab6511a6837d_" X-Originating-IP: [173.15.87.33] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:08:37 -0600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2010 21:08:37.0532 (UTC) FILETIME=[9728A5C0:01CB9009] --_2daace45-fdbb-4bec-a74d-ab6511a6837d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi=2C The short answer is yes you can process images in Hadoop. Think of the image as a multi-line byte stream. As to an existing class=2C I don't believe that it exists=2C but shouldn't = be too difficult to cobble.=20 (If you can read in XML records for processing you should be able to read i= n a file containing a series of images.) Note: I'm assuming that you're either reading in a directory w multiple ima= ge files=2C or an image file w multiple images. Otherwise you probably don'= t want to use Hadoop. > Date: Mon=2C 29 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 > Subject: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop > From: b.aravinth@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > Hi=2C >=20 > I am a beginner to Hadoop and I am looking for some help in implementing = the > Mapper with an image as input. Is there any predefined Writable class for > processing image? If so=2C how do I use it? >=20 > Also I have read somewhere that compressed formats cannot be processed in > Hadoop. If this is true=2C am I making any sense in saying that the JPEG > images (which are also compressed format) cannot be processed by Hadoop? > Please correct me if I have misunderstood this concept. >=20 > Thanks=2C > --=20 > Aravinth = --_2daace45-fdbb-4bec-a74d-ab6511a6837d_-- From general-return-2450-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 22:14:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83902 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 22:14:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:14:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 66511 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66468 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66460 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 22:14:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:14:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of b.aravinth@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:14:00 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2481988ewy.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:13:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f4UYZkAg3iDdMai5EUJMxAM0vsDuiiwQI6Aj2NCZrGo=; b=b4k3pJ0IQoqCkIph9LcoTxJu1zuQau3w8tX3GJvwBkMLghHnsg9UI0JonoA1tr3o/O Kyo60ZMEHytgHWrhhUT6uXD5dyFiLy8e3goucWjcna4VpD9qDCIkQY8qNslLssks5ZDe AWzj7MHzd+vJDxgtXudtOF+6fore9frDXnM9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=v7H36Sazu+zY8QKJfAnA5mDwvHT8FdN9hRBECWmqXr99dtSuCXMbf48kY63ebT4qIJ x5G98lsD6t1zdjupyqD3dFiMNGmu/468ViGCl7Ut2UzOQVtWaeNN6S6efUIZiDSc+Stc GfuI2PwLp/16yrf+7dw/SNevOh+FdFwFv4P94= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.155.68 with SMTP id i46mr6012264wek.92.1291068818973; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.86.203 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:13:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:13:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop From: Aravinth Bheemaraj To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b48fa55f2e304963862d2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b48fa55f2e304963862d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Michael, thanks a lot for your reply. I got to compare the images based on pixels. So is it possible to process the image based on Pixel values rather than XML records? I have read somewhere that the class "InputFormat" can be customized to handle images by extending "InputSplit" and "RecordReader". But I am unsure of the methods which are to be overridden so that I can access pixels of the image. Is there anyway you can help me with this? Regarding the note, I am reading in a directory with multiple image files. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > > Hi, > The short answer is yes you can process images in Hadoop. > Think of the image as a multi-line byte stream. > > As to an existing class, I don't believe that it exists, but shouldn't be > too difficult to cobble. > (If you can read in XML records for processing you should be able to read > in a file containing a series of images.) > > Note: I'm assuming that you're either reading in a directory w multiple > image files, or an image file w multiple images. Otherwise you probably > don't want to use Hadoop. > > > > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 > > Subject: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop > > From: b.aravinth@gmail.com > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > Hi, > > > > I am a beginner to Hadoop and I am looking for some help in implementing > the > > Mapper with an image as input. Is there any predefined Writable class for > > processing image? If so, how do I use it? > > > > Also I have read somewhere that compressed formats cannot be processed in > > Hadoop. If this is true, am I making any sense in saying that the JPEG > > images (which are also compressed format) cannot be processed by Hadoop? > > Please correct me if I have misunderstood this concept. > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Aravinth > > -- Aravinth Bheemaraj University of Florida --0016e65b48fa55f2e304963862d2-- From general-return-2451-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 22:31:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89321 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 22:31:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:31:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 97257 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97214 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97206 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 22:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:31:15 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] (tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.120.91]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id oATMUfFT076001 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1291069841; bh=GlcBIiq45lImNwqzVGBbQ0W1HUqYy16vv6GpmVSV3QM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date; b=Nir8a2iKJ6n1AO0fFv1oozrbLomkX4Nr+Y/er3jhcsv2lEHacm2YsP6wfjAcGCErm gzM6Yq0+EHLJmFw629JtVZwXJDBQ75PfmMRUtg94uR0OKy3CVgWRD6g7ab2B40n7oU Ut80jWHRWTmBah6DNuL+iejLwOndZqi0dEAWLC7Q= Message-Id: From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-39--769971144 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:41 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-39--769971144 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, Based on the discussion on HADOOP-6685, there is a pretty fundamental difference of opinion about how Hadoop should evolve. We need to figure out how the majority of the PMC wants the project to evolve to understand which patches move us forward. Please vote whether you approve of the following direction. Clearly as the author, I'm +1. -- Owen Hadoop has always included library code so that users had a strong foundation to build their applications on without needing to continually reinvent the wheel. This combination of framework and powerful library code is a common pattern for successful projects, such as Java, Lucene, etc. Toward that end, we need to continue to extend the Hadoop library code and actively maintain it as the framework evolves. Continuing support for SequenceFile and TFile, which are both widely used is mandatory. The opposite pattern of implementing the framework and letting each distribution add the required libraries will lead to increased community fragmentation and vendor lock in. Hadoop's generic serialization framework had a lot of promise when it was introduced, but has been hampered by a lack of plugins other than Writables and Java serialization. Supporting a wide range of serializations natively in Hadoop will give the users new capabilities. Currently, to support Avro or ProtoBuf objects mutually incompatible third party solutions are required. It benefits Hadoop to support them with a common framework that will support all of them. In particular, having easy, out of the box support for Thrift, ProtoBufs, Avro, and our legacy serializations is a desired state. As a distributed system, there are many instances where Hadoop needs to serialize data. Many of those applications need a lightweight, versioned serialization framework like ProtocolBuffers or Thrift and using them is appropriate. Adding dependences on Thrift and ProtocolBuffers to the previous dependence on Avro is acceptable. --Apple-Mail-39--769971144-- From general-return-2452-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 22:50:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94101 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 22:50:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:50:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 25337 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:50:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25114 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 22:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25102 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 22:50:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:50:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shrijeet@rocketfuelinc.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:49:58 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3978538fxm.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:49:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.83.133 with SMTP id f5mr6019465fal.29.1291070976980; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.96.131 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:49:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:49:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop From: Shrijeet Paliwal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This gentleman here (see below) is doing a hadoop streaming magic and seems to be playing with the image features in map reducy way. Its not using hadoop's java api though, so no help there. Still you can check and see if the articles gives you some clues, http://techportal.ibuildings.com/2009/11/02/precision-color-searching-with-gmagick-and-amazon-elastic-mapreduce/ PS: Pardon if the motivation in the article is orthogonal to yours. -Shrijeet On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Aravinth Bheemaraj wrote: > Michael, thanks a lot for your reply. > > I got to compare the images based on pixels. So is it possible to process > the image based on Pixel values rather than XML records? > > I have read somewhere that the class "InputFormat" can be customized to > handle images by extending "InputSplit" and "RecordReader". But I am unsure > of the methods which are to be overridden so that I can access pixels of the > image. Is there anyway you can help me with this? > > Regarding the note, I am reading in a directory with multiple image files. > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> The short answer is yes you can process images in Hadoop. >> Think of the image as a multi-line byte stream. >> >> As to an existing class, I don't believe that it exists, but shouldn't be >> too difficult to cobble. >> (If you can read in XML records for processing you should be able to read >> in a file containing a series of images.) >> >> Note: I'm assuming that you're either reading in a directory w multiple >> image files, or an image file w multiple images. Otherwise you probably >> don't want to use Hadoop. >> >> >> > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 >> > Subject: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop >> > From: b.aravinth@gmail.com >> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am a beginner to Hadoop and I am looking for some help in implementing >> the >> > Mapper with an image as input. Is there any predefined Writable class for >> > processing image? If so, how do I use it? >> > >> > Also I have read somewhere that compressed formats cannot be processed in >> > Hadoop. If this is true, am I making any sense in saying that the JPEG >> > images (which are also compressed format) cannot be processed by Hadoop? >> > Please correct me if I have misunderstood this concept. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > Aravinth >> >> > > > > -- > Aravinth Bheemaraj > University of Florida > From general-return-2453-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 23:06:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6681 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 23:06:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 23:06:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 36826 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 23:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36737 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 23:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36553 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 23:06:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:06:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of Greg.Troyan@zecco.net does not designate 64.18.0.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.0.184] (HELO exprod5og107.obsmtp.com) (64.18.0.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:06:07 +0000 Received: from source ([38.102.132.228]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5ob107.postini.com ([64.18.4.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTPQxyikE3FC6CXEgKTQQFFJcxPpp3tZm@postini.com; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:05:47 PST Received: from mx1bg.zecco.local ([10.3.30.16]) by mx1bg.zecco.local ([10.3.30.16]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:04:55 -0800 From: Greg Troyan To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:04:55 -0800 Subject: Help with "Hadoop common not found" and bug HADOOP-6953 Thread-Topic: Help with "Hadoop common not found" and bug HADOOP-6953 Thread-Index: AcuQGdUr5H3+zBcFSxSt0s1x5DEUTw== Message-ID: <1766D7881BAA7C4386198E998D962F7F3713336537@mx1bg.zecco.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-8.6.0.1386-6.500.1024-17796.005 x-tm-as-result: No--53.694800-5.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1766D7881BAA7C4386198E998D962F7F3713336537mx1bgzeccoloc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_1766D7881BAA7C4386198E998D962F7F3713336537mx1bgzeccoloc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Like others, I am experiencing the Hadoop common not found" error when star= ting hadoop using start-dfs.sh under Hadoop v0.21. I have found this link that shows how to edit hdfs-config.sh and mapred-con= fig.sh: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953 But it's still not working for me. I've added the code from that link to both files to no effect. To start with the most obvious: Could it be that I've pasted the code in th= e wrong place in the files? (I basically plopped the code at the beginning = of the file.) Here's what my hdsf-config.sh looks like: this=3D"${BASH_SOURCE-$0}" while [ -h "$this" ]; do ls=3D`ls -ld "$this"` link=3D`expr "$ls" : '.-> (.)$'` if expr "$link" : './.' > /dev/null; then this=3D"$link" else this=3D`dirname "$this"`/"$link" fi done # convert relative path to absolute path common_bin=3D`dirname "$this"` script=3D`basename "$this"` common_bin=3D`cd "$common_bin"; pwd` this=3D"$common_bin/$script" # the root of the Hadoop installation #TODO: change the env variable when dir structure is changed export HADOOP_HOME=3D`dirname "$this"`/.. export HADOOP_COMMON_HOME=3D"${HADOOP_HOME}" bin=3D`dirname "$0"` bin=3D`cd "$bin"; pwd` export HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=3D"${HADOOP_HDFS_HOME:-$bin/..}" if [ -d "${HADOOP_COMMON_HOME}" ]; then . "$HADOOP_COMMON_HOME"/bin/hadoop-config.sh elif [ -d "${HADOOP_HOME}" ]; then . "$HADOOP_HOME"/bin/hadoop-config.sh else echo "Hadoop common not found." exit fi ________________________________ Zecco.com is a financial portal of Zecco Holdings, Inc. Zecco Holdings, Inc= . is not a securities broker/dealer. Securities offered through Zecco Tradi= ng, Inc. The content of this message and its attachments is intended only f= or the use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privi= leged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination= , distribution, or copying of this message or its attachments is prohibited= . If you received this message in error, please notify the sender by replyi= ng to this email immediately and delete this message and its attachments fr= om your computer. --_000_1766D7881BAA7C4386198E998D962F7F3713336537mx1bgzeccoloc_-- From general-return-2454-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Nov 29 23:14:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10121 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 23:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 23:14:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 49479 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 23:14:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49397 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 23:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49386 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 23:14:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:14:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:14:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 9877 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 23:14:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:14:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:14:28 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen, First, I don't see the yes/no issue that you'd like us to vote on here. We vote on patches. We vote on releases. We vote on committers. We don't vote on a project direction statement. Rather folks present plans, others may present their conflicting concerns, and we need to get these to meet in order to make progress on a particular issue. I too support continuing support for SequenceFile. I too support adding flexible serialization APIs to MapReduce. I do not support extending SequenceFile's format in substantial ways. A proliferation of expressively equivalent yet incompatible file formats hinders the interoperable evolution of the Hadoop ecosystem. I do not support adding new dependencies to the classpath of MapReduce user tasks. We want to provide as much flexibility to user code as possible. The more libraries the system includes the greater the potential for version conflicts. As the Hadoop ecosystem expands, MapReduce should seek primarily to be an efficient, reliable kernel, not an extensive library of tools. So I agree with some of your points, but not with others. Cheers, Doug On 11/29/2010 02:30 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, > Based on the discussion on HADOOP-6685, there is a pretty fundamental > difference of opinion about how Hadoop should evolve. We need to figure > out how the majority of the PMC wants the project to evolve to > understand which patches move us forward. Please vote whether you > approve of the following direction. Clearly as the author, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > > Hadoop has always included library code so that users had a strong > foundation to build their applications on without needing to continually > reinvent the wheel. This combination of framework and powerful library > code is a common pattern for successful projects, such as Java, Lucene, > etc. Toward that end, we need to continue to extend the Hadoop library > code and actively maintain it as the framework evolves. Continuing > support for SequenceFile and TFile, which are both widely used is > mandatory. The opposite pattern of implementing the framework and > letting each distribution add the required libraries will lead to > increased community fragmentation and vendor lock in. > > Hadoop's generic serialization framework had a lot of promise when it > was introduced, but has been hampered by a lack of plugins other than > Writables and Java serialization. Supporting a wide range of > serializations natively in Hadoop will give the users new capabilities. > Currently, to support Avro or ProtoBuf objects mutually incompatible > third party solutions are required. It benefits Hadoop to support them > with a common framework that will support all of them. In particular, > having easy, out of the box support for Thrift, ProtoBufs, Avro, and our > legacy serializations is a desired state. > > As a distributed system, there are many instances where Hadoop needs to > serialize data. Many of those applications need a lightweight, versioned > serialization framework like ProtocolBuffers or Thrift and using them is > appropriate. Adding dependences on Thrift and ProtocolBuffers to the > previous dependence on Avro is acceptable. From general-return-2455-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 00:22:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37412 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 00:22:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 00:22:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12241 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 00:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12197 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12189 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 00:22:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:22:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:22:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 37352 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 00:22:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:22:11 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4999737bwz.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:22:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.147 with SMTP id q19mr5908896bkg.69.1291076529306; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.57.75 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:22:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> References: <4CF433D4.6090407@apache.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:22:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Direction for Hadoop development From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a938e83d8004963a2d24 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a938e83d8004963a2d24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: We don't vote on a project direction statement. Rather folks present plans, > others may present their conflicting concerns, and we need to get these to > meet in order to make progress on a particular issue. > We haven't in the past, but clearly there is currently disagreement on the direction for Hadoop that is blocking forward progress. Using a vote to decide on project direction is far better than vetoing patches based on disjoint visions of how to move forward. If the project votes for a direction, a veto that is based on an opposing direction is clearly invalid. I too support continuing support for SequenceFile. > I said far more than that. I said that it should be actively maintained as the framework evolves. Clearly the generic serialization changes are far more useful if they include a file format that uses them. Extending SequenceFile and TFile is a good thing. I do not support extending SequenceFile's format in substantial ways. A > proliferation of expressively equivalent yet incompatible file formats > hinders the interoperable evolution of the Hadoop ecosystem. > There is no equivalent functionality and even if there was, it would still be worthwhile extending SequenceFile since they are so heavily used. Making SequenceFile support the new serialization API increases their value with minimal disruption to users. I do not support adding new dependencies to the classpath of MapReduce user > tasks. That isn't reasonable. As Hadoop evolves, we have and will continue to add dependences. For example, in your last MapReduce (MAPREDUCE-980) patch you added avro and paranamer as dependences. -- Owen --001636c5a938e83d8004963a2d24-- From general-return-2456-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 00:53:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52548 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 00:53:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 00:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 37475 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 00:53:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37292 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 00:53:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37283 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 00:53:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:53:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dsikar@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:52:59 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2871390gxk.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rUPZiQr/YQs4j7MJk7wWnR+CU6KL+2Z6F7VlRHvVjkg=; b=S/AweoyN6naELuSjozShtC514HUytdaTJjBnJPn3H137LsTAh6LLJaL/8hZ1Qb0puX TqFXqnYkb/DtVzw+IyFsE/Idul3fc8oY+WVW6dHkTNJG0God9zAdnqZqqF/3Qs3ulTtM 41pM+NlT4Er0fE+tnEPJvOrcKY7aexuYKBjG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YrDtfICOAFr97ZCvXR8Pd23Gcs1Qm2gkBUutm8RYZ3VLQRX6fGXFr5lI8sYLLd/Uqj vgxOKJuWO2IVWx4nkuey4wWLvaMCMmT/RvBDyD5TaYvEc6FjVuu0S25zfRS/Pc60G8mQ vpoca6uDHwbrJqzg3xjexMKPjf9sGZ+ZdmYwo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.121.20 with SMTP id y20mr10069188agm.28.1291078358105; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.62.15 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:52:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:52:38 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop From: daniel sikar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Aravinth This is probably do-able with Hadoop Streaming. Imagine you have copied a bunch of image files to HDFS and now you want to point them to say, an executable. Odds are that executable already exists with some command line options that would take amongst other things, the file path of the image you would like to process. Hadoop Streaming makes a number of environment variables available at runtime, for instance "map_input_file" which gives you the file name of the file being processed, and so forth. My guess is that there is also an environment variable that will give you the filepath in the local filesystem. You need to code that in plus add a -file parameter to specify your executable. If you are using Amazon's EMR, you will need to put your code and executable into an S3 bucket, then specify the bucket name to Hadoop Streaming. Good luck Daniel On 29 November 2010 22:49, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > This gentleman here (see below) is doing a hadoop streaming magic and > seems to be playing with the image features in map reducy way. Its not > using hadoop's java api though, so no help there. > Still you can check and see if the articles gives you some clues, > http://techportal.ibuildings.com/2009/11/02/precision-color-searching-with-gmagick-and-amazon-elastic-mapreduce/ > > PS: Pardon if the motivation in the article is orthogonal to yours. > > -Shrijeet > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Aravinth Bheemaraj > wrote: >> Michael, thanks a lot for your reply. >> >> I got to compare the images based on pixels. So is it possible to process >> the image based on Pixel values rather than XML records? >> >> I have read somewhere that the class "InputFormat" can be customized to >> handle images by extending "InputSplit" and "RecordReader". But I am unsure >> of the methods which are to be overridden so that I can access pixels of the >> image. Is there anyway you can help me with this? >> >> Regarding the note, I am reading in a directory with multiple image files. >> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Michael Segel wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> The short answer is yes you can process images in Hadoop. >>> Think of the image as a multi-line byte stream. >>> >>> As to an existing class, I don't believe that it exists, but shouldn't be >>> too difficult to cobble. >>> (If you can read in XML records for processing you should be able to read >>> in a file containing a series of images.) >>> >>> Note: I'm assuming that you're either reading in a directory w multiple >>> image files, or an image file w multiple images. Otherwise you probably >>> don't want to use Hadoop. >>> >>> >>> > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:35 -0500 >>> > Subject: Image as input to M-R in Hadoop >>> > From: b.aravinth@gmail.com >>> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I am a beginner to Hadoop and I am looking for some help in implementing >>> the >>> > Mapper with an image as input. Is there any predefined Writable class for >>> > processing image? If so, how do I use it? >>> > >>> > Also I have read somewhere that compressed formats cannot be processed in >>> > Hadoop. If this is true, am I making any sense in saying that the JPEG >>> > images (which are also compressed format) cannot be processed by Hadoop? >>> > Please correct me if I have misunderstood this concept. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -- >>> > Aravinth >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Aravinth Bheemaraj >> University of Florida >> > From general-return-2457-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 12:33:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59239 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 12:33:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 12:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 4938 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 12:33:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4688 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 12:33:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4671 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 12:33:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:33:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.70] (HELO mailout01.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:33:27 +0000 Received: from mailint01 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout01 (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF48C4DE5 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint01 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF7B4DD8; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.24]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:08 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:33:04 +0100 Message-ID: <219D8244D980254ABF28AB469AD4E98F04013AEE@VF-MBX13.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Thread-Index: AcuNrsrXyhcorlqwRB2lpoaN711T7gAdELnbAJmzDhA= References: , From: "Gibbon, Robert, VF-Group" To: , "Vinithra Varadharajan" Cc: , "Hue-Users" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2010 12:33:08.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE2C4510:01CB908A] Hi Evert, We use the WebDAV tool integrated with HUE for authenticated ad-hoc read/write access but for full throttle inbound data, our implementation uses Flume. With that said, the WebDAV solution is horizontally scalable - it is a stateless web app - so a software or hardware loadbalancer could be your friend here to get the throughput up. FTP is a session based protocol - and I have not looked in detail at the HDFS-FTP implementation so it might not be so easy to scale it sideways. HTH Robert -----Original Message----- From: Evert Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl]=20 Sent: Samstag, 27. November 2010 12:29 To: Vinithra Varadharajan; general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hue-Users Subject: RE: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos Hi Vinithra, others, We are using CDH3b3 (which works amazingly well!!). And it's nice see Y!'s Kerberos solution coupled to HDFS. But I wouldn't use Hue to upload a set of files accumulating to 100's of GBs or a number of TB's. Browser-based applications are not suitable for that, in my experience. Do you have different experiences with Hue? (To be fair, we haven't tested its performance yet.) We are setting up a cluster that will be shared by people from a number of different institutes, all working on different cases with different data. Their work and data should be protected, also from each other. At the same time they need to be able to transfer their data onto HDFS (with a high enough throughput) from their local clusters / machines. Is there a standard that others are using and that works for shared clusters? How are Y! people getting their data onto HDFS? Right now we are using SFTP. We handle authentication a bit 'hacky', but it works: we've coupled our LDAP server to Hue through an Auth*Handler, which also allows for executing a script that updates authentication tokens for our FTP. So far the throughput is far from high enough though - 1.5 MB/s - with data going over the line unencrypted. Unless we can get that up significantly, while providing the option to encrypt the data on the wire, that will probably not be a long term solution. If anybody can share experiences on transparently and securely getting data onto HDFS from external locations, that would be much appreciated! Cheers, Evert ________________________________________ From: Vinithra Varadharajan [vinithra@cloudera.com] Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 10:12 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; Evert Lammerts Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hue-Users Subject: Re: interfaces to HDFS icw Kerberos + Hue-user mailing list Hi Evert, Which version of Hue and CDH are you using? CDH3b3 includes Yahoo's security patches, which provide Kerberos authentication. In CDH3b3, we have made changes to Hue's filebrowser application, which provides an interface to upload data into HDFS, so that it works with Hadoop's authentication. Is this similar to what you're looking for? Thanks, Vinithra On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Evert Lammerts > wrote: Hi list, We're considering to provide our users with FTP and WebDAV interfaces (with software provided here: http://www.hadoop.iponweb.net/). These both support user accounts, so we'll be able to deal with authentication. We're evaluating Cloudera's Hue, which we have coupled to our LDAP service for authentication, as an interface to MapReduce. These solutions are not the most beautiful in terms of authentication. We'd much prefer to use Kerberos as provided by Y!. But if we do so, how will we enable users to get data from the outside world onto HDFS? How do others provide secure but easy interfaces to HDFS? Kind regards, Evert Lammerts From general-return-2458-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 15:27:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61201 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 15:27:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 15:27:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 94649 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:27:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94371 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94340 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 15:27:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:27:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of agrawalprachi88@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:26:58 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2954100wwb.29 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CcoS/j4JC9z53i/eXfyh6NRwt53kBeTG3tCBPbzZFRs=; b=Z8iRRwV/LwC84BGx+Dp1UvCDbmc4fEg7quQ1rn9RvJITlQ6p+C+iytxdgHmebWy99P FxqhWm+DmB5XdYxSzCaJahfTrlEITwxIQpW0STt0B3Iumn8NdPXk2fHExGp+IKgChjgN SczKOCA0LzzlSLFOntjxMkFq666lfAFvw17G4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kL/PommenkNH86j5fehg0zY66mq7zV51l5lk0e1/jmjyFGB7HGefl/K8HRYXJ/Z3tB Xwi9viJHiqvxt/Lo0/iJe067upsrH0FjQbjBOO3/RXYLZtbeh2Zrqds3wkdYucoZVM5W cZs32vICy/8C3wKYKGMucNt0PXjIoo3z+RzdU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.142.85 with SMTP id p21mr7921092wbu.150.1291130795025; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.145.207 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:26:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:56:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: how to uninstall hue From: prachi agrawal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649c71a658714049646d026 --0016e649c71a658714049646d026 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i have installed hue using apt-get install hue it is installed on cloudera running in pseudo distributed mode thanx in advance --0016e649c71a658714049646d026-- From general-return-2459-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 15:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67161 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 15:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 15:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 23989 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:42:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23787 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23779 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 15:42:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:42:05 +0000 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2900238ewy.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:41:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Hu2oRVAFMHtTe+tNHk1/H8r5wN3sr2CEHNu4TorVzTk=; b=QqIgw+//ad+tiw7V6Jj3INB3sdKZeU00Oerm+q8F5gr0FAZ/tCK8ByKnU5Or6tL6Ag fL36J9SQeuy+mpROeU700VvZb2CZ2X/idIqgW5MENp16MxJK0qbOx9Wu8PG9VtZFKy2C 1aIdmVKPk5GlXLMnOJms8/9fbAEa09CsKv3EY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bdk2sh57TRnqL9X2rxrA03a2WcO+vbe+dqfhM6tRvhGCKvZAq0bGfOS+wm1wPvYIyZ c0AQrxtD0JHNnAlUt6dWxUt/3+dTUYU+d0jMz3uHKCuQBVaOOdezzpz+5wPVfXaxDfMC Ovy6+S8qv04Aq6lADxYDHHaCC/tWEjZBOuu5w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.78 with SMTP id x14mr2635417ebc.1.1291131703131; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:41:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.105.83 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:41:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to uninstall hue From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Please contact the vendor of this product for any support. Bernd On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 16:26, prachi agrawal wrote: > i have installed hue using > > apt-get install hue > > it is installed on cloudera running in pseudo distributed mode > > thanx in advance > From general-return-2460-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 15:45:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67905 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 15:45:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 15:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29331 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29282 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 15:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29274 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 15:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:45:24 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oAUFGhZ5012250 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:16:43 -0600 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 180C243B5136 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:45:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id BLXHHPIRtPs5KEii for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:45:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.172]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id oAUFixtf024044 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:44:59 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:43:20 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:44:58 -0600 Subject: RE: how to uninstall hue Thread-Topic: how to uninstall hue Thread-Index: AcuQpSiwh3p6Vi17S76E7Vp8OUqsOQAABu/A Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The first thing you want to do is to edit the configuration files and rem= ove references to the hue plug in. Then after you restart, Hue won't work= and you don't have to worry about the classes going away when you remove= the product. Just did a quick google and here's the top result from the search: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/how-do-i-get-apt-get-to= -completely-uninstall-a-package-237772/ That should help you get started.... -----Original Message----- From: Bernd Fondermann [mailto:bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:42 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: how to uninstall hue Hi, Please contact the vendor of this product for any support. Bernd On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 16:26, prachi agrawal = wrote: > i have installed hue using > > apt-get install hue > > it is installed on cloudera running in pseudo distributed mode > > thanx in advance > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2461-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 16:06:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81800 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 16:06:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 16:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 72673 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:06:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72450 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72201 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 16:06:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:06:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jcoveney@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:06:07 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so5717318bwz.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:05:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SycUCF+tUxWij62uVW/wJyJ/83gStdTYpz99VJ+/prw=; b=bY5dVQvRoAOlJd6t+6j5MbkcnosfEMx/hSm5fvNhGC/xS3gQIqKCD/fJfnNXh5hqQQ 60c35rGBxpGHZqgG8bwIGBrT8Y0IKr2IuidKA81jTcLuT8x7XH6Jgw28Z1EcdXu9rTHU oHsZLgb7M1RS1M23E0IKB1sxm3/hwK/OzrIRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=oLJC9z07NqBswvPsnNykfyQojONhmzWvtubb8TpxO6dVq8qq614pBg5U6xZZbvp0Z2 Mk4ck3srjCgkDk734Lhbyft6NyH2dE86J59kCFdSbeW1CGUkrE9qaSTrTch0a1n/2iYW 5o8oQNXbl/hWNIoXtoGTZjE3Sh9QWgfxAeeEc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.101.11 with SMTP id a11mr6762342bko.159.1291133146860; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.64.199 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:05:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:05:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Help: frustration with types and whatnot while trying to do a conditional sum From: Jonathan Coveney To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd98b89391a60496475ca3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dd98b89391a60496475ca3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I appreciate any help you can give. I've searched around and haven't found anything directly related... I've gone through documentation but can't find a real reason why this doesn't work. Here is the jist of my code (n1 is arbitrary, just to group by, n2 is either null or a large integer): table = LOAD stuff AS (n1:chararray, n2:chararray, other irrelevant stuff); pared = foreach table generate n1, n2; grouped = group pared by n1; counted = foreach grouped generate group, (double)SUM((IsEmpty(pared.n2) ? 0:1))/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; ordered = order counted by ratio desc; limited = limit ordered 200; dump limited; This gets this error: ERROR 1045: Could not infer the matching function for org.apache.pig.builtin.SUM as multiple or none of them fit. Please use an explicit cast. If I take out the double parenthesis in the counted sum ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: SUM in {group: chararray,pared: {n1: chararray,n2: chararray}} I THINK the error is that sum wants the column of a bag as an input, not actual integers...so I thought I'd try and make that happen by making the input take the form I want. So in order to try and get around this, I thought this might work (changing only these lines) pared = foreach beacon_fact generate n1, (IsEmpty(n2) ? 0 : 1) as ooz:int; grouped = group pared by n1; counted = foreach grouped generate group, (double)SUM(pared.n1)/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; But this gives this error: ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: n2 in {n1: chararray,ooz: int} I have no real clue why this fails... I tried breaking it up into two steps and it doesn't matter. I'd ideally like to do this without making a UDF, as I feel the base functionality should support it. Not sure. Either way, I'd appreciate any help or pointers, as well as any rationale as to why it does or doesn't work within the pig framework. The whole bag system is still somewhat counterintuitive. Thank you for your time --0016e6dd98b89391a60496475ca3-- From general-return-2462-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 16:14:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85273 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 16:14:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 16:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 92692 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:14:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92530 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:14:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92509 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 16:14:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:14:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:14:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 85162 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 16:14:18 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:14:18 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so5725066bwz.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:14:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.5 with SMTP id a5mr6946529bks.177.1291133654953; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:14:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.57.75 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:14:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:14:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help: frustration with types and whatnot while trying to do a conditional sum From: "Owen O'Malley" To: user@pig.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d625f8dd941a0496477a77 --0016e6d625f8dd941a0496477a77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Pig has moved to its own mailing lists. Please follow up over there. -- Owen On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > I appreciate any help you can give. I've searched around and haven't found > anything directly related... I've gone through documentation but can't find > a real reason why this doesn't work. > > Here is the jist of my code (n1 is arbitrary, just to group by, n2 is > either > null or a large integer): > > table = LOAD stuff AS (n1:chararray, n2:chararray, other irrelevant stuff); > pared = foreach table generate n1, n2; > grouped = group pared by n1; > counted = foreach grouped generate group, (double)SUM((IsEmpty(pared.n2) ? > 0:1))/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; > ordered = order counted by ratio desc; > limited = limit ordered 200; > dump limited; > > This gets this error: > > ERROR 1045: Could not infer the matching function for > org.apache.pig.builtin.SUM as multiple or none of them fit. Please use an > explicit cast. > > If I take out the double parenthesis in the counted sum > > ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: SUM in {group: > chararray,pared: {n1: chararray,n2: chararray}} > > I THINK the error is that sum wants the column of a bag as an input, not > actual integers...so I thought I'd try and make that happen by making the > input take the form I want. > > So in order to try and get around this, I thought this might work (changing > only these lines) > > pared = foreach beacon_fact generate n1, (IsEmpty(n2) ? 0 : 1) as ooz:int; > grouped = group pared by n1; > counted = foreach grouped generate group, > (double)SUM(pared.n1)/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; > > But this gives this error: > ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: n2 in {n1: chararray,ooz: > int} > > I have no real clue why this fails... I tried breaking it up into two steps > and it doesn't matter. > > I'd ideally like to do this without making a UDF, as I feel the base > functionality should support it. Not sure. > > Either way, I'd appreciate any help or pointers, as well as any rationale > as > to why it does or doesn't work within the pig framework. The whole bag > system is still somewhat counterintuitive. > > Thank you for your time > --0016e6d625f8dd941a0496477a77-- From general-return-2463-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 16:16:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86140 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 16:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 16:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 99593 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99450 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99441 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 16:16:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:16:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcoveney@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:16:39 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so5727023bwz.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:16:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iJQ1AoYW3/0ZODeSwO/sJkuku4tsd1hAzQDJJqFaquk=; b=jb6pCs8xLCTsTDZqsf7M5bysd4b33OIGHv3iY67B9ivJf/ZfCAoc4f9Ar4j5nbFNLZ E2pd8DxtRnRY5vsaPK4ftKQodoM3ftiA89x/ovx0nREy4RLlPJUOuiTG21QpfQhXzWH4 6kln7D4c80zdyySon0EbzrR658MGkRsQ223/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pDlRPd10rHyaqRlEdrNwNoHyM516tyckr9bFnUemChJlDfRb1fi9sX0EpN8zuzJVIO eKTBuV0ZH68aD1Zz9dksRUlnj4dA24AyPL1hb6G+ePtezDNld3gcHgSSdVD39TopW8Qw b+CuqBXN5S5lbPtHDHEM2yQWTKkKYtz+gg8K4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.75.194 with SMTP id z2mr6916777bkj.132.1291133774991; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.64.199 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:16:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:16:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help: frustration with types and whatnot while trying to do a conditional sum From: Jonathan Coveney To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7d7d20414fc04964782e3 --001485f7d7d20414fc04964782e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am sorry, I got confused. I will do that. 2010/11/30 Owen O'Malley > Pig has moved to its own mailing lists. Please follow up over there. > -- Owen > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Jonathan Coveney >wrote: > > > I appreciate any help you can give. I've searched around and haven't > found > > anything directly related... I've gone through documentation but can't > find > > a real reason why this doesn't work. > > > > Here is the jist of my code (n1 is arbitrary, just to group by, n2 is > > either > > null or a large integer): > > > > table = LOAD stuff AS (n1:chararray, n2:chararray, other irrelevant > stuff); > > pared = foreach table generate n1, n2; > > grouped = group pared by n1; > > counted = foreach grouped generate group, (double)SUM((IsEmpty(pared.n2) > ? > > 0:1))/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; > > ordered = order counted by ratio desc; > > limited = limit ordered 200; > > dump limited; > > > > This gets this error: > > > > ERROR 1045: Could not infer the matching function for > > org.apache.pig.builtin.SUM as multiple or none of them fit. Please use an > > explicit cast. > > > > If I take out the double parenthesis in the counted sum > > > > ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: SUM in {group: > > chararray,pared: {n1: chararray,n2: chararray}} > > > > I THINK the error is that sum wants the column of a bag as an input, not > > actual integers...so I thought I'd try and make that happen by making the > > input take the form I want. > > > > So in order to try and get around this, I thought this might work > (changing > > only these lines) > > > > pared = foreach beacon_fact generate n1, (IsEmpty(n2) ? 0 : 1) as > ooz:int; > > grouped = group pared by n1; > > counted = foreach grouped generate group, > > (double)SUM(pared.n1)/(double)COUNT(pared.n2) as ratio:double; > > > > But this gives this error: > > ERROR 1000: Error during parsing. Invalid alias: n2 in {n1: > chararray,ooz: > > int} > > > > I have no real clue why this fails... I tried breaking it up into two > steps > > and it doesn't matter. > > > > I'd ideally like to do this without making a UDF, as I feel the base > > functionality should support it. Not sure. > > > > Either way, I'd appreciate any help or pointers, as well as any rationale > > as > > to why it does or doesn't work within the pig framework. The whole bag > > system is still somewhat counterintuitive. > > > > Thank you for your time > > > --001485f7d7d20414fc04964782e3-- From general-return-2464-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Nov 30 16:32:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92179 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2010 16:32:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2010 16:32:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 24979 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:32:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23674 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2010 16:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23312 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2010 16:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:32:24 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so3318828gxk.35 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.91.194 with SMTP id o2mr6231944qcm.250.1291134722418; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:32:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.251.205 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:31:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:31:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to uninstall hue To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bernd is referring to the mailing list at https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/hue-user/topics, which is the right place for discussions of Hue. -- Philip On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Hi, > > Please contact the vendor of this product for any support. > > =A0Bernd > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 16:26, prachi agrawal = wrote: >> i have installed hue using >> >> apt-get install hue >> >> it is installed on cloudera running in pseudo distributed mode >> >> thanx in advance >> > From general-return-148-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 02 22:05:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85684 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2009 22:05:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2009 22:05:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25537 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2009 22:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25478 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2009 22:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25468 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2009 22:05:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:05:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.175] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:05:33 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so786625wfg.2 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=15CxOtfQuEu3JISIDNL6t7h7J0fZqffuVDdvbDeZHHY=; b=IO0Co4YcuxDe4V5rmYWhrzqQgB0kAdMOE1jejCgGvFMAENhTKVgTiIrdjVwlnGW6Sr OxSXaXjtsjaujgxMHvUKaElZia12Tqwsgjpc5ZMZMXVGDQyMbIOVkOZOFHwz9zyeFgKy S3jQAaHGnFP/PkV+pwykOyNa6C2tp3HQrutSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eCTmycRqveuFrYTkIaVfW51kZSCjkk1Nfz0GW6aYAv0DfIq0lDiJdgW9z5CSQ73/IP cd24ddjtOvDukP03jLWHbrorLMvhu6zaNDW9jaGob4ewI6a21ryV3qcucDFwNnmq4ipE JRzWzKZGXkmx4gr28rTZNUjtyL/+wNjT+1H4c= Received: by 10.142.156.19 with SMTP id d19mr115506wfe.6.1238709912371; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm2202336wfc.57.2009.04.02.15.05.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:08 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. The code is currently at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ To learn more: git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro cat avro/README.txt Comments? Questions? Doug From general-return-149-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 02 22:20:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95062 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2009 22:20:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2009 22:20:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 42241 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2009 22:20:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42164 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2009 22:20:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42154 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2009 22:20:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:20:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:20:33 +0000 Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aaKW1b0030QuhwU58mL1Jz; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:20:01 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id amL31b00N2SbwD53NmL6xa; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:20:10 +0000 Message-Id: <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:20:01 -0700 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. +1. Even if Justin comes after me for allowing another Jakarta. *smile* -- Owen From general-return-150-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 00:12:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22381 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 00:12:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 00:12:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 44559 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 00:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44484 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 00:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44474 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 00:12:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:12:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.164 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.164] (HELO mail-gx0-f164.google.com) (209.85.217.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:11:59 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1871316gxk.5 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PgcczehY2Rt6G/XEOxX4gG0AOUnDBJ+bouPt2FOZSJI=; b=So51eUsB0IhBQn5YPNHJfH00GsysqPgISnF2PthRMewY4xoeoPrNkKouYex2USECSh CNw9qhi6saSTYZSzIs/dQhlk9R/P2VKEOPOFYuRpOFYUHeKTYx5PGcY71yVP95LnsE2m 0vLErtswVYcmJVRSAZpdXrOfPVxJmIeQEJSS0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yat3+nZXYg4sMhH70f/g1YmOtxrvkOppi1HSshQBRWmUxOn4QG7rHZdXD0LJBCMab7 fuQVe4QY/Z9Hf2flv7b3QzmpH2Sduiz71ngUFLO1iWWbFsvZObpio9MQWrnnqn5YVejK oVvaky5CAat0AiymwEDrUatO7RMQ6LTo4sXQc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.9.17 with SMTP id m17mr1067760ybi.173.1238717498192; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:11:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd47b067505ac04669b647c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd47b067505ac04669b647c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am a newbie here. Why not use something existing like protocol buffers : http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ which is open source and works amazingly well. On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. >> > > +1. Even if Justin comes after me for allowing another Jakarta. *smile* > > -- Owen > --000e0cd47b067505ac04669b647c-- From general-return-151-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 04:29:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96586 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 04:29:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 04:29:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 29016 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 04:29:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28925 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 04:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28912 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 04:29:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:29:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:29:25 +0000 Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id arrU1b0070SCNGk53sUyiw; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:28:58 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.13] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id asUv1b0072VBGtd3VsUy6x; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:29:03 +0000 Message-Id: <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:28:53 -0700 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 2, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Abhishek Verma wrote: > I am a newbie here. Why not use something existing like protocol > buffers : > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ which is open source and works > amazingly > well. There are two blockers for protocol buffers that make them suboptimal for Hadoop. They are: 1. Protocol buffers are open source, but the community isn't open. Google doesn't seem interested in getting patches from outside of itself. If we needed something changed in protocol buffers, we'd end up needing to fork the project to make any progress. 2. Protocol buffers (and thrift) encode the field names as id numbers. That means that if you read them into dynamic language like Python that it has to use the field numbers instead of the field names. In Avro, the field names are saved and there are no field ids. A final point is that since the schema isn't inlined in Avro, the binary representation is much tighter than protocol buffers. -- Owen From general-return-152-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 16:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68108 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 66183 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66120 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66110 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 16:07:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:07:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.236] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:07:11 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1031527rvb.29 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z99Eb/dwtmLhbuyCDLGb0vEm/xEfREuGws/ngueGBuk=; b=T0Wqb6/9YekUYzSrtUUFNtGrEhW6jblA77WwcrAQB1Izkk0850vRoMQgM7L2K+bDAu C4SPCgOcaeKuh1q+v7jUFRH0Z7v5rkOP20E/+gt0fqMKs3Ni/gvKZ2amwkcNGUOuiL7t vqA8RI4Y4jgITN/tWvh6FHn1oezPdyyJSX1KA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oM1y737FvMRKTw08+BfDLikiWQ+DWi5q6SzjCIWJDGKn05RMJVGH02gMF8QP0xmUYD is8W/mDvjuj/wNP0tRh24RftqE0qhYfE6nVTTHd5f+Ag9HUDDx3Vl/a+YvbNn1ZL26DB B+mQr4Ct1X1VYZPhno4mTvkxAssZdQAcv7UrA= Received: by 10.142.179.2 with SMTP id b2mr365670wff.308.1238774810498; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm3195874wfc.37.2009.04.03.09.06.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:06:45 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > 2. Protocol buffers (and thrift) encode the field names as id numbers. > That means that if you read them into dynamic language like Python that > it has to use the field numbers instead of the field names. In Avro, the > field names are saved and there are no field ids. This hints at a related problem with Thrift and Protocol Buffers, which is that they require one to generate code for each datatype one processes. This is awkward in dynamic environments, where one would like to write a script (Pig, Python, Perl, Hive, whatever) to process input data and generate output data, without having to locate the IDL for each input file, run an IDL compiler, load the generated code, generate an IDL file for the output, run the compiler again, load the output code and finally write your output. Avro rather lets you simply open your inputs, examine their datatypes, specify output types and write them. Avro's Java implementation currently includes three different data representations: - a "generic" representation uses a standard set of datastructures for all datatypes: records are represented as Map, arrays as List, longs as Long, etc. - a "reflect" representation uses Java reflection to permit one to read and write existing Java classes with Avro. - a "specific" representation generates Java classes that are compiled and loaded, much like Thrift and Protocol Buffers. We don't expect most scripting languages to use more than a single representation. Implementing Avro is quite simple, by design. We have a Python implementation, and hope to add more soon. Doug From general-return-153-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 16:24:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76470 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 16:24:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 16:24:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3726 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 16:24:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3641 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 16:24:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3590 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 16:24:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:24:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bryan@rapleaf.com designates 216.74.32.93 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.74.32.93] (HELO mail.rapleaf.com) (216.74.32.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:24:48 +0000 Received: from mail.rapleaf.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E9712502F9; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:24:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=rapleaf.com; q=dns; s=m1; b=D8xvc 47iI34hHj2SOZqehAYdXYfMuRImdbUMWXuFkRomWeR/EURGu+AoEG6b3q90uChQy RzPpOK0N7Q9NOB6qAqh6p0Qyv5FcdIKnIi18CQJPBPHxWanBydu+qLYGnHCvLnuD FqSWx2diCKiYK9oHcwxBy8i726dmSkjKWzTTk0= Received: from [10.100.18.119] (unknown [10.100.18.119]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98201125016F; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> Cc: thrift-user@incubator.apache.org, thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bryan Duxbury Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:24:26 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It sounds like what you want is the option avoid pre-generated classes. If that's the only thing you need, it seems like we could bolt that on to Thrift with almost no work. I assume you'd have the schema stored in metadata or file header or something, right? (You wouldn't want to store the field names in the binary encoding as strings, since that would probably very quickly dwarf the size of the actual data in a lot of cases.) If my assumptions are correct, it seems like it'd be a lot smarter to leverage existing Thrift infrastructure and encoding work rather than duplicating it for this lone feature. -Bryan On Apr 3, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> 2. Protocol buffers (and thrift) encode the field names as id >> numbers. That means that if you read them into dynamic language >> like Python that it has to use the field numbers instead of the >> field names. In Avro, the field names are saved and there are no >> field ids. > > This hints at a related problem with Thrift and Protocol Buffers, > which is that they require one to generate code for each datatype > one processes. This is awkward in dynamic environments, where one > would like to write a script (Pig, Python, Perl, Hive, whatever) to > process input data and generate output data, without having to > locate the IDL for each input file, run an IDL compiler, load the > generated code, generate an IDL file for the output, run the > compiler again, load the output code and finally write your > output. Avro rather lets you simply open your inputs, examine > their datatypes, specify output types and write them. > > Avro's Java implementation currently includes three different data > representations: > > - a "generic" representation uses a standard set of datastructures > for all datatypes: records are represented as Map, > arrays as List, longs as Long, etc. > > - a "reflect" representation uses Java reflection to permit one to > read and write existing Java classes with Avro. > > - a "specific" representation generates Java classes that are > compiled and loaded, much like Thrift and Protocol Buffers. > > We don't expect most scripting languages to use more than a single > representation. Implementing Avro is quite simple, by design. We > have a Python implementation, and hope to add more soon. > > Doug From general-return-154-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 17:28:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4307 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 17:28:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 17:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7492 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:28:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7428 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7418 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 17:28:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:28:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.228] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:28:30 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so355220rvb.5 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QW4DS5cIAXcGDwZbGEamNeba4kNDHYONTcZ8kRoUt7A=; b=EOlOA1+WmS8pFjrLflHUvp5mvDGDxQD3X/d4HtMFayrBeB9BcsXtVbgd/dFYIMMi8C CxKF/aELd0UFM/3aNLEOJ6sowQjkUBD4jGa1TZHJikv9f4003RbuWVCvfn8C0BWnw8Ml Sdjl1ij6Y89T6PAxxAFtigDfM3D6/PsQis4Ks= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=G4Alt/bWe1XOEYmFHHB9ZOGR1eygzqPkuvJyxrkr88Z70y1ZdEXtHhlIen+MEYQlLU MEiWBI8F6K53JuPCdS+tVf7kqvrSNwNHOch7p+Tvnw+sa2sj5jB/f7XZyVZi/VnzI0Dl 92nnwIlgH3ufQEKvnu2x2P2W0ou2EZYTX2J+c= Received: by 10.142.88.4 with SMTP id l4mr389155wfb.117.1238779688900; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm3288987wff.2.2009.04.03.10.28.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:28:03 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> In-Reply-To: <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bryan Duxbury wrote: > It sounds like what you want is the option avoid pre-generated classes. That's part of it. But, once you have the schema, you might as well take advantage of it. With the schema in hand, you don't need to tag data with field numbers or types, since that's all there in the schema. So, having the schema, you can use a simpler data format. Also, with the schema, resolving version differences is simplified. Developers don't need to assign field numbers, but can just use names. For performance, one can internally use field numbers while reading, to avoid string comparisons, but developers need no longer specify these, but can use names, as in most software. Here having the schema means we can simplify the IDL and its versioning semantics. > If that's the only thing you need, it seems like we could bolt that on > to Thrift with almost no work. Would you write parsers for Thrift's IDL in every language? Or would you use JSON, as Avro does, to avoid that? Once you're using a different IDL and a different data format, what's shared with Thrift? Fundamentally, those two things define a serialization system, no? > I assume you'd have the schema stored in > metadata or file header or something, right? (You wouldn't want to store > the field names in the binary encoding as strings, since that would > probably very quickly dwarf the size of the actual data in a lot of cases.) Yes, in data files the schema is typically stored in the metadata. > If my assumptions are correct, it seems like it'd be a lot smarter to > leverage existing Thrift infrastructure and encoding work rather than > duplicating it for this lone feature. What specific shared infrastructure would be leveraged? For Hadoop's RPC, I hope to adapt Hadoop's client and server implementations as a transport, as these have been highly tuned for Hadoop's performance requirements. Doug From general-return-155-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 17:40:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12353 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 17:40:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 17:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25051 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25004 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24994 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 17:40:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:40:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.174] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:40:07 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1185626wfg.2 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mS9Sf2Kind2oOvEjaxytM4RdNV/Dm6zIg9QZ9wh1PFw=; b=Sh/PxfKuICwdRQW78cKB7gi4tszb8cIZmq87pgiL5E4bA6O0sZ/pUJQMptMGS2tNji hcrGletGRvB6DhhNuuz2zl8DjxYHHX1MevUFDd2K7Qgy2EcUhs9eDAMMH/xY2AiuWrJT lzeLZjA8ZdGzXw3hAG3e7KkHA+YJxvQCByrqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wDVAeTUwTgfQThiu0mjO00uL1FnEtdGF1XNmHFsu6dph46kYJqX0i5ZnnGxICXiwbK ppces00Zj2X4j/Tw0AgqPaG8laPODgLmQPtf0HRPk9TcIsOWG0GjFPBb2scxn7s0TXtX 8W0i02IaFghxnxD9LlKIiHzkPs3fNsPq63ans= Received: by 10.143.31.4 with SMTP id i4mr385094wfj.247.1238780386805; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm3308068wfg.11.2009.04.03.10.39.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D649DE.9070709@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:39:42 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt I've posted the generated documentation. The specification is at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro/spec.html and the javadoc is at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro/api/index.html Doug From general-return-156-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 17:44:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14538 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 17:44:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 17:44:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 27237 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:44:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27173 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:44:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27163 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 17:44:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:44:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:43:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.199] (snvvpn1-10-72-245-c238.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.245.238]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n33HhABT077943 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:43:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Em1RErvmX2CPKuOF3CEcRmLNgSOQ1MUg7mAHOTUPiMxnxb3vM4/DS2sI/k4ixV58 Message-Id: <711F0681-940A-4470-9816-931B5B146620@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:43:10 -0700 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Pig would be happy to use a cross language serialization package that did not require pre-compilation to read and write. Alan. On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to > be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing > Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug From general-return-157-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 18:05:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20560 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 18:05:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 18:05:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 31989 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31967 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 17:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31956 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 17:50:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bryan@rapleaf.com designates 216.74.32.93 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.74.32.93] (HELO mail.rapleaf.com) (216.74.32.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:50:37 +0000 Received: from mail.rapleaf.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF012502EE for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:50:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=rapleaf.com; q=dns; s=m1; b=DIn5X cjLT5KTGDMYlP0HO3o7/V0eLC2777KowoPCPpCK1VPbPKL/ExoW4N61AR6fO20yF r8ufFp+BJBQPahYko5KQ6vcXITtxxMnpFiL6EwC5VaFIGsmN+bWpzSfEud68XZZ1 yzNBdfk0WhL3IheOnrfoX+xhTP63FZop+p5dKE= Received: from [10.100.18.119] (unknown [10.100.18.119]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AA3125016F for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bryan Duxbury Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:50:14 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > With the schema in hand, you don't need to tag data with field > numbers or types, since that's all there in the schema. So, having > the schema, you can use a simpler data format. To a degree, we already have that in Thrift - we call it the DenseProtocol. > Would you write parsers for Thrift's IDL in every language? Or > would you use JSON, as Avro does, to avoid that? When it comes to having a code-usable IDL for the schema, I'm totally pro-JSON. > Once you're using a different IDL and a different data format, > what's shared with Thrift? Fundamentally, those two things define > a serialization system, no? It's not actually a different data format, is it? You're saying that the user wouldn't specify the field IDs, but you'd fundamentally still use field ids for compactness and the like. You may not use actual Thrift generated objects, but you could certainly use Binary or Compact protocol from Thrift to do all the writing to the wire. You might also be able to use (or contribute to) Thrift's RPC-level stuff like server implementations. We have some respectable Java servers written, and if those aren't enough for your uses, I'd actually be really interested in seeing if we could generalize some of the Hadoop stuff to be useful within Thrift. The bottom line is that I would love to see greater cooperation between Hadoop and Thrift. Unless it's impossible or impractical for Thrift to be useful here, I think we'd be willing to work towards Hadoop's needs. -Bryan From general-return-158-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 18:52:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45707 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 18:52:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 18:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 84265 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 18:38:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84243 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 18:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84232 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 18:38:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:38:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.226] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:38:17 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1081284rvb.29 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J+BmWUtmICOfcWQebHNOFKM43BV2Rx8aK36Kt2egw7A=; b=wXAArA87okR7tuPhGiRlpLehsPBIDwnmEc0u6Zbvp6oV5bOgQR/8FVVYHJsJIGwgv/ yyantRsKepCTYeZxVkb+bflLiDUBo30tN3VrR2WQfb1iG2YSCUnBYo2V0MfzMjKkmVbM xLi3JWdi5jfwzACWtZvtEJiwHmolTTaMpGzMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i9UI7jIkUeAvCgO11gMie6I5w1eqrzg4FLOZ8CyRi4a08P2fZDNJ1l0ZbvkqKmGguH vqRhkbpGdTyyvjArdUM27a63ODUyxdWrjcSeywjUkJudRvQC90OSl2azMWBgXknrIjUP e/PFKU5wXDomkXPl8WrwetJCkBei6ottrTpbw= Received: by 10.142.88.3 with SMTP id l3mr395071wfb.339.1238783875897; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm425355wfd.26.2009.04.03.11.37.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:37:51 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bryan Duxbury wrote: > It's not actually a different data format, is it? You're saying that the > user wouldn't specify the field IDs, but you'd fundamentally still use > field ids for compactness and the like. Field ids are not present in Avro data except in the schema. A record's fields are serialized in the order that the fields occur in the records schema, with no per-field annotations whatsoever. For example, a record that contains a string and an int is serialized simply as a string followed by an int, nothing before, nothing between and nothing after. So, yes, it is a different data format. > The bottom line is that I would love to see greater cooperation between > Hadoop and Thrift. Unless it's impossible or impractical for Thrift to > be useful here, I think we'd be willing to work towards Hadoop's needs. Perhaps Thrift could be augmented to support Avro's JSON schemas and serialization. Then it could interoperate with other Avro-based systems. But then Thrift would have yet another serialization format, that every language would need to implement for it to be useful... Avro will only ever have one serialization format. Thrift fundamentally standardizes an API, not a data format. Avro fundamentally is a data format specification, like XML. Thrift could implement this specification. The Avro project includes reference implementations, but the format is intended to be simple enough and the specification stable enough that others might reasonably develop alternate, independent implementations. Doug From general-return-159-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 19:04:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55959 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 19:04:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 19:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29341 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:04:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29290 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:04:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29279 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 19:04:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:04:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.133] (HELO sca-es-mail-2.sun.com) (192.18.43.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:04:08 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n33J3aLo024950 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:03:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KHJ00500GIC1E00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [42.132.180.78] (wireless-am10.ucsd.edu [128.54.48.14]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHJ00HPEGXZA8B0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:03:35 -0700 From: George Porter Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro In-reply-to: <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> Sender: George.Porter@Sun.COM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 3, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> > > Field ids are not present in Avro data except in the schema. A > record's fields are serialized in the order that the fields occur in > the records schema, with no per-field annotations whatsoever. For > example, a record that contains a string and an int is serialized > simply as a string followed by an int, nothing before, nothing > between and nothing after. So, yes, it is a different data format. While this representation would certainly be as compact as possible, wouldn't it prevent evolving the data structure over time? One of the nice features of Google Protocol Buffers and Thrift is that you can evolve the set of fields over time, and older/newer clients can talk to older/newer services. If the proposed Avro is evolvable, then perhaps I'm misunderstanding your statement about the lack of IDs in the serialized data. I also agree with Bryan, in that it would be unfortunate to have two different Apache projects with overlapping goals. Regardless of features, both protocol buffers and thrift have the advantage of being debugged in mission-critical production environments. -George From general-return-160-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 19:50:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71615 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 19:50:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 19:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 84447 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:50:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84391 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:50:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84381 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 19:50:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:50:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:49:52 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:49:31 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:49:29 -0700 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Index: Acm0jv948NH3v2V3QM+326WbEtDlVQABk1vG Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/3/09 12:03 PM, "George Porter" wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Apr 3, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >>>=20 >>=20 >> Field ids are not present in Avro data except in the schema. A >> record's fields are serialized in the order that the fields occur in >> the records schema, with no per-field annotations whatsoever. For >> example, a record that contains a string and an int is serialized >> simply as a string followed by an int, nothing before, nothing >> between and nothing after. So, yes, it is a different data format. >=20 > While this representation would certainly be as compact as possible, > wouldn't it prevent evolving the data structure over time? One of the > nice features of Google Protocol Buffers and Thrift is that you can > evolve the set of fields over time, and older/newer clients can talk > to older/newer services. If the proposed Avro is evolvable, then > perhaps I'm misunderstanding your statement about the lack of IDs in > the serialized data. >From a quick perusal of the serialization format -- it contains headers wit= h type/schema information, and other metadata blocks. The types can be inferred from this, and if this is done right then older/newer clients will be able to read things just fine. What can't be done is mixing two different formats in the same stream if headers define the format of the whole stream. I have not looked much deeper than that, but it looks like schema evolution is feasible. >=20 > I also agree with Bryan, in that it would be unfortunate to have two > different Apache projects with overlapping goals. Regardless of > features, both protocol buffers and thrift have the advantage of being > debugged in mission-critical production environments. >=20 > -George >=20 From general-return-161-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 19:59:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74446 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 19:59:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 19:59:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 95300 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:59:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95216 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 19:59:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95204 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 19:59:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:59:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bryan@rapleaf.com designates 216.74.32.93 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.74.32.93] (HELO mail.rapleaf.com) (216.74.32.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:59:38 +0000 Received: from mail.rapleaf.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7031612502F9 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=rapleaf.com; q=dns; s=m1; b=DLaXP JGPJYVjXM8Dj38/hVXyHWyfW0sTjlafqf2KqcbF899tIc9GBpegor3qotTOp/qQl 1MUizEF/zVTTNs9m/0cGfwcV3wWYGURaKrIiE2yRKRXe+D4mA+E1xCfFbZOucnd4 CMbp03xjGwVQjcS3dkdM0EAMja0Bc/hquDqZrU= Received: from [10.100.18.119] (unknown [10.100.18.119]) by mail.rapleaf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB8712502EE for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bryan Duxbury Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:59:15 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Field ids are not present in Avro data except in the schema. A > record's fields are serialized in the order that the fields occur > in the records schema, with no per-field annotations whatsoever. > For example, a record that contains a string and an int is > serialized simply as a string followed by an int, nothing before, > nothing between and nothing after. So, yes, it is a different data > format. So you can't serialize nulls? It also seems like this would make forward/backward compatibility a little more complex. Thrift solves this problem by using tags to indicate what kind of field you're working with. -Bryan From general-return-162-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 20:03:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76294 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 20:03:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 20:03:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 98887 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:03:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98803 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98793 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 20:03:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.175] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:03:02 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1239066wfg.2 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0wrte25rKZ80+aEA93U7ChcBHYp4e8aklH+uJCUhxv8=; b=r1nQe84ao/72FItl/kY3EEKg0Pko5xpi9gC6TJgbONUzX5f2cJKDsoYsFbcdhkzSsB 5usapylOh14DWaN5B1dQJlmgoNPoFU99TkBvjt1LYvayABXePUgYSveVloWuIISXCQPY hIOBP7mj24pZdQcyJIBFCCgohGGIL67TLfAw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aLi06On5Rzdyeb+0G1QPigbOX5O2oJLs71WzeiC1rINrCwMuXHFYAL3LtuHK3QtYzc WvYes+NIbNifHajdBrJah2bkg/7XqVXmAQSAyrbq05Trlw1pViI9hKjfWJBFBtlVsX1f LpPJTkOUOtcnlBnCS+GvCorxiy06wBEVqnvN8= Received: by 10.142.52.7 with SMTP id z7mr414122wfz.267.1238788962322; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm3454385wfg.3.2009.04.03.13.02.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D66B40.5070509@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:08 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org George Porter wrote: > While this representation would certainly be as compact as possible, > wouldn't it prevent evolving the data structure over time? One of the > nice features of Google Protocol Buffers and Thrift is that you can > evolve the set of fields over time, and older/newer clients can talk to > older/newer services. If the proposed Avro is evolvable, then perhaps > I'm misunderstanding your statement about the lack of IDs in the > serialized data. Avro supports schema evolution. In Avro, the schema used to write the data must be available when the data is read. (In files, it is typically stored in the file metadata.) If you have the schema that was used to write the data, and you're expecting a slightly different schema, then you simply keep those fields that are in both schemas and skip those not. This is equivalent to Thrift and Protocol Buffer's support for schema evolution, but does not require manually assigning numeric field ids. This feature can also be used to support projection. If you have records with many large fields, but only need a single field in a particular computation, then you can specify an expected schema with only that field, and the runtime will efficiently skip all of the other fields, returning a record with just the single, expected field. > I also agree with Bryan, in that it would be unfortunate to have two > different Apache projects with overlapping goals. We already have both Thrift and Etch in the incubator, which have similar goals. Apache does not attempt to mandate that projects have disjoint goals. There are many ways to slice things, and Apache prefers to rely on survival of the fittest rather than forcing things together. > Regardless of > features, both protocol buffers and thrift have the advantage of being > debugged in mission-critical production environments. Yes, but, as I've argued in other messages in this thread, they do not support the dynamic features we need. Adding those features would add new code that would share little with existing code in those projects. So, while the projects are conceptually similar, the implementations are necessarily different, and, without significant code overlap, separate projects seem more natural. Doug From general-return-163-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 20:36:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85447 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 20:36:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 20:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 26198 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:24:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26175 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:24:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26165 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 20:24:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:24:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.132] (HELO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.43.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:24:26 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n33KO5gA005504 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KHJ00J00KMNHQ00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [42.132.180.78] (wireless-am10.ucsd.edu [128.54.48.14]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHJ00GRAKO5XH90@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:24:05 -0700 From: George Porter Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro In-reply-to: <49D66B40.5070509@apache.org> Sender: George.Porter@Sun.COM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <68F2489F-05D7-4D8F-924B-EBF740579355@Sun.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <4CB9034E-05FB-4200-AF55-FFD78B2EEFCE@apache.org> <3c682ecd0904021711x41fe4dd2j291f2077284d5558@mail.gmail.com> <8BBAB2C9-FCF9-4261-9E4B-282CD4196FA2@apache.org> <49D63415.8060004@apache.org> <718F2DEF-B305-49C9-B62F-155D2F4CE12F@rapleaf.com> <49D64723.7020706@apache.org> <49D6577F.4080307@apache.org> <49D66B40.5070509@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 3, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > George Porter wrote: >> While this representation would certainly be as compact as >> possible, wouldn't it prevent evolving the data structure over >> time? One of the nice features of Google Protocol Buffers and >> Thrift is that you can evolve the set of fields over time, and >> older/newer clients can talk to older/newer services. If the >> proposed Avro is evolvable, then perhaps I'm misunderstanding your >> statement about the lack of IDs in the serialized data. > > Avro supports schema evolution. In Avro, the schema used to write > the data must be available when the data is read. (In files, it is > typically stored in the file metadata.) > > If you have the schema that was used to write the data, and you're > expecting a slightly different schema, then you simply keep those > fields that are in both schemas and skip those not. This is > equivalent to Thrift and Protocol Buffer's support for schema > evolution, but does not require manually assigning numeric field ids. > > This feature can also be used to support projection. If you have > records with many large fields, but only need a single field in a > particular computation, then you can specify an expected schema with > only that field, and the runtime will efficiently skip all of the > other fields, returning a record with just the single, expected field. Thanks for the clarification--I better understand the schema relationship. The projection feature is a nice feature, especially since it seems like it would be able to support "sparse files" where you want to just peek at large structs without invoking a lot of disk- io (for data serialized on-disk). > > >> I also agree with Bryan, in that it would be unfortunate to have >> two different Apache projects with overlapping goals. > > We already have both Thrift and Etch in the incubator, which have > similar goals. Apache does not attempt to mandate that projects > have disjoint goals. There are many ways to slice things, and > Apache prefers to rely on survival of the fittest rather than > forcing things together. > >> Regardless of features, both protocol buffers and thrift have the >> advantage of being debugged in mission-critical production >> environments. > > Yes, but, as I've argued in other messages in this thread, they do > not support the dynamic features we need. Adding those features > would add new code that would share little with existing code in > those projects. So, while the projects are conceptually similar, the > implementations are necessarily different, and, without significant > code overlap, separate projects seem more natural. > > Doug Makes sense. Thanks, George From general-return-164-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 20:37:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86129 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 20:36:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 20:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27474 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:27:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27453 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27443 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 20:27:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:27:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.38.122] (HELO web50902.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:27:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 59825 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Apr 2009 20:27:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1238790430; bh=6RkKtHoVGczPss7hcsS6Bkp5TtUnqxv4WkrEUXnjzTY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cQVjlqVlUPFAQKirT/+StiQxU2PtETbp5KSJ+nc/OCT59fVQo9Hm8HV2ataIYczOPdCCbus5XHtHy/cibXmJpeWCycK4IOGzTO2lFkf7LrBvur/3v+ROUsCkvqaCrLlIFJmyfJXPD8jkOGH7T9vp53HX+VjXrzyNbJAmAcrqRKM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FeZIgb9QjYIKdqKnRTQ+JA+R7kEbHY+xHXjQeKJ4m47Zb8cgfxrfb//NUG388kHAqPf20ZT/CEQsYQMviaFPkCHvhW8UhvxAcO8CEO8rvgLLfaR5Rgy3dBOrz+C9w72CSuM9lOpbNsN2NQOT8wpTdXTkGZE+5VvVUBATscQP/V0=; Message-ID: <758794.58891.qm@web50902.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: IBoK20YVM1kU2cS64He7SnIo.b4AHA4nWYa9h.NRdYL6C0mrTCd8mEJgABMMtyinw5YGnH1u73MFpsNemBK21J7E_Su.zyV610s1H.rePQxICnGeF8IvPfyDCZvqFuEnGBYMZAXNo0vS1EOgbDeaHLeFMHVcUwZ4U_tcNUX68CwNJtnnxy7Gh4vJvPJhW6B7b6dSgBDDW3oKh6OsH3cj_Xc1RCprEZAG_njp8pQidmaCjtCmNNDaxJX5yoX8EDyiQ0BeghK8eM9kQ48eO_SK9Y0IOJOxofjo1vpTGy15dw23Nn.u.0T9BaHshn0UfQVJMYI3feaTHSJhWNWyyoGA Received: from [98.234.219.2] by web50902.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:27:10 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:27:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Sameer Paranjpye Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 While protocol buffers and thrift have similar goals. Avro takes a different approach to schema evolution and reconciliation. I feel that Avros tighter layout of data and schema management is better suited for many of Hadoop and Pigs use cases for large data sets/tables on HDFS. Field ids start to matter when milions of objects have hundreds of fields each. There is, of course, the storage overhead. Schema management becomes hard especially if there are cases where field ids need to be assigned manually. ----- Original Message ---- From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 3:05:08 PM Subject: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. The code is currently at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ To learn more: git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro cat avro/README.txt Comments? Questions? Doug From general-return-165-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 20:49:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95461 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 20:49:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 58746 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58671 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58661 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 20:49:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:49:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:49:14 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.196] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c99.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.99]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n33Kl5Gk088088 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Ur4Gr3HPLbvFwe7nHqELRHAVszIh8Oh/WgLPzowd90MnUlTiphFbwD5IHLHU0SUn Message-Id: <3DBB0E23-7B6D-4541-A0D6-3687DF02C397@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:47:04 -0700 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to > be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing > Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug From general-return-166-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 21:00:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98540 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 21:00:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 21:00:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 69106 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 21:00:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69035 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 21:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69025 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 21:00:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:00:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:00:31 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n33KxuxA053324 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:59:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=anVY80lL0Ls8JrEZgIAZVFs10cs0XrA9R9B0n+42zIMISXd45nkLPo9cGN59nTh0 Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:59:56 -0700 From: Jerome Boulon To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:59:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Index: Acmz32qJXRwwUeKUTougg4PRElvdIAAv7irY Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C5FBC6DA198B7jboulonyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C5FBC6DA198B7jboulonyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chukwa needs a cross language serialization/RPC framework. During demux, being able to create dynamically the schema based on the reco= rdType will be a big plus instead of using an hardcoded one, The projection feature will also be useful. +1 /Jerome. On 4/2/09 3:05 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. The code is currently at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ To learn more: git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro cat avro/README.txt Comments? Questions? Doug --_000_C5FBC6DA198B7jboulonyahooinccom_-- From general-return-167-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 22:10:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24148 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 22:10:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 22:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 62632 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 22:10:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62551 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 22:10:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62518 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 22:10:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [131.107.115.212] (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) (131.107.115.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:10:40 +0000 Received: from TK5-EXHUB-C102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.18.53) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:10:19 -0700 Received: from NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.110.52]) by TK5-EXHUB-C102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.53]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:10:12 -0700 From: "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:10:17 -0700 Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Index: Acm0nbcWMxtRL47oQNeZ3l2aOazQIgACX2CQ Message-ID: References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <3DBB0E23-7B6D-4541-A0D6-3687DF02C397@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <3DBB0E23-7B6D-4541-A0D6-3687DF02C397@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -----Original Message----- > On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >=20 > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to > be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing > Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug After reading all the messages about Avro, I'm still not sure I understand why we should invent "yet another wheel". There are a number of people in the community who have significant investments in Thrift, and I have yet to see a compelling argument for Avro over Thrift. My understanding is that Thrift already supports multi-language bindings, something the HBase community has been asking for, for some time. It is also my understanding (based on the email thread) that Avro only supports Java and python. That is a step backwards from Thrift. It appears that Avro uses introspection heavily, which is expensive in applications that require a high message rate. So I guess my question is why Avro? I may be thick, but it seems to me as if it is just another wheel of a different color. If I could see a point by point comparison between Avro and Thrift I could be convinced that Avro is the way to go. So far, I have not seen any compelling reason to re-invent the wheel. +-0 --- Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation) From general-return-168-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 03 22:45:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39641 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 22:45:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 22:45:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 96134 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 22:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96069 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 22:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96059 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 22:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.169] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:45:21 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1290931wfg.2 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ib2/8KzQBziNAPkQCTR/6OxJEJ2tuAfAtBHqIOUa/9U=; b=stmy7YR/6v7Rv9yHK0eT5OWPhdoaMsHCv5oSXH9YVlAseFBUU64D09A3vhH39y/w4P n4RS8zmKpyAOcMrww4u0dGLm7SxqgxF8h4+ONpNh2FZH5EUxfcr2JXANfghzViHi052X bvx2QrZwE3PAfCH7IjpQ2q3p7FTDIL1x532M0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xesD/Z+zpov+46IHu6ghit5Fn2em7JeuFYVGlhTrT89us/xrtufs7b1BNiz//MVRXW 0Jwnr1ccZNXRM2ZaUMYB2t+QoooAolOE9rfg11ui1LyBSbp+2W/XKdhJ9zDniSlHu0em KjCYxIKVedkwQsYP5U0BBnpyHQ/x6OKYVZDT0= Received: by 10.142.186.9 with SMTP id j9mr457102wff.5.1238798700423; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm3569952wff.42.2009.04.03.15.44.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49D69169.2070208@apache.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:44:57 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <3DBB0E23-7B6D-4541-A0D6-3687DF02C397@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) wrote: > It is also my understanding (based on the email thread) that Avro only > supports Java and python. That is a step backwards from Thrift. We intend to add support for more languages. Avro is not complete. > It appears that Avro uses introspection heavily, which is expensive in > applications that require a high message rate. It only uses introspection if you wish to use your existing Java classes to represent Avro data. There are three representations in Java: generic (uses Map for records, List for arrays), specific (generates a java class for each Avro record, like Thrift) and reflect (uses reflection to access existing classes). So introspection is optional. And, while introspection is indeed slow for processing file-based data, it would probably not a bottleneck for most RPC protocols and might be a useful tool to migrate existing code to Avro. > So I guess my question is why Avro? The compelling case is dynamic data types. Pig, Hive, Python, Perl etc. scripts should not have to generate a Thrift IDL file each time they wish to write a data file with a new schema, nor should they need to run the Thrift compiler for each data file they wish to read. For production applications, code-generation is not an imposition and may offer increased opportunities for optimization and error checking, but for exploration and experimentation, a very common use case for Hadoop, one would like to be able to browse datasets and build mapreduce programs more interactively. Doug From general-return-169-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 05:34:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58094 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 05:34:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 05:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 66419 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 05:34:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66328 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 05:34:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66318 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 05:34:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:34:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:34:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c109.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.109]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n365XrDd098512 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 22:33:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Z4Q6iq5gMTH5ez4rdiLhswILv32YQpYcMozFAIigeESdr56Mj5C5VeLAN2MZisI2 Message-Id: <9645918B-C037-4219-8629-05686401793B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-843315381 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 22:33:56 -0700 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-2-843315381 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to > be > used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing > Hadoop > committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug > +1 sanjay --Apple-Mail-2-843315381-- From general-return-170-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 05:43:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63571 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 05:43:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 05:43:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 70000 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 05:43:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69922 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 05:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69912 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 05:43:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 05:43:16 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so1243743ywt.29 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:42:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iTyphvajyxON0ASIjdk5Mq5uTGByNbAumwfhoWx0BLs=; b=Z4R67wuByruh0FuMgWhPjbPkRrxve2p13pCFkzliA9LgQ208AldlQ6YJU6ON2Q3BKa i+yD9yX5UQiFjasI0aD6Hy9b6xlUwpv/FD9iDzknumwcWgDNSwvX/2JrvcogFhlwk3vr MXB8sI9g7Qw1gJXFic/HSi6hKomDZdpsXZpG0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QV8H2vuq0BnoBnyjHFBinUmFQl+KCfjFMTpZ7fEG/wrXFqx49wtA+NnVMpsjBDlDou d8T087meEfHgUaAheiqTKH52wmPNQb+Kcoew6UbCMtSryQTj8AqwKtQbJKCNvDioLfW4 N1BlE16+Jx18lB/OBLp9pXfcclvLjfshXk29U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.103.11 with SMTP id f11mr7743340ybm.80.1238996575139; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:42:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9645918B-C037-4219-8629-05686401793B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <9645918B-C037-4219-8629-05686401793B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 22:42:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70904052242s2fe92931n1d3963a671b9cbce@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750e7f0bd3a690466dc5e2d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151750e7f0bd3a690466dc5e2d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1. Awesome! -dhruba On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization >> system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be >> used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. >> >> Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop >> committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. >> >> The code is currently at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ >> >> To learn more: >> >> git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/avro >> cat avro/README.txt >> >> Comments? Questions? >> >> Doug >> >> +1 > > sanjay --00151750e7f0bd3a690466dc5e2d-- From general-return-171-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 07:23:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14039 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 07:23:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 07:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 40253 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 07:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40200 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 07:23:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40190 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 07:23:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:23:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.9.53] (HELO web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.9.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:23:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 23889 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2009 07:23:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1239002598; bh=UGhBDEehlvVQay2BUkN0BmTxhG+AMwJ5Ox/HOXZAQs0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XpVKLzjReDdpa0mQbenUumKspV1kQzUJJG0YfgbjIW8IjIBUiyahtEPWkudPg/2TPfTh3DOelDp7VLAveyo8DArAOyRapxl5ADypMJd5nj2Ae7iYBvE4mXXiYePYkygW4nxyAnZ4j+Oyjlaf+eWedMuPI6JyLTmWDIDWQcipl3g= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YSbahDhUCzdclcd7rSFgdRBL2Si1B3js8GN983B8+B5zr0i8PuzADjD5DLCW4xWjFqjvXG7hStTmuxYZ5+3eMsxVIu+25ItxbiilItGUt69t7lizf9hQdm7yhs6xVBCVNEDNS0c3h45VF9oNHxFRpqGXLNZnrgMqYplOcxqMHgk=; Message-ID: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: nrCQCcAVM1msVeYNEdnj5WkU3AKnH8UgVyR7zLkK7fBnvVeUWrPhhx1_2oeqa5PQs8fpuMKUwhrhUaOuDkeaqvtqAiwCu2fG4mJf.jgGxebHcFJfBDeRbUl27YJhJHl8OpXnH8YaxKeBNOotVdPfkq17gfJlh4jizdKClYMqQTz.FBvX6wdRdZQoFszhzLtEirf3wqimRQKf9G_yCCR7V4fOFVtWwozaelrOvSaA89ax5qiPOOEbXUWtdLVvkC9r1hYiQ7cT6kYBwgLefb.m.GN8r767jFnNEcAkSySy6mDew7SB2UEBHm.p8efczoWBpkDvaOkuEUslnc4XL0Y- Received: from [75.0.178.207] by web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:23:18 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:23:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Chad Walters Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: thrift-user@incubator.apache.org, thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cross-posting to the Thrift dev and user lists since folks there may be interested in this. It appears that my attempts to subscribe to general@hadoop.apache.org from my work email were silently failing somewhere along the line -- I'll try not to take it personally. ;) Some others have experienced this too -- so if you didn't get a subscription confirmation message, then it failed. Try from a different address, I guess. You can view the thread here without being subscribed: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/200904.mbox/browser Doug, First, let me say that I think Avro has a lot of useful features -- features that I would like to see fully supported in Thrift. At a minimum, I would like for us to be able to hash out the details to guarantee that there can really be full interoperability between Avro and Thrift. I am really interested in working cooperatively and collaboratively on this and I am willing to put in significant time on design and communication to help make full interoperability possible (I am unfortunately not able to contribute code directly at this time). Second, I think all of this decision about where Avro should live requires more thought and more discussion. I'd love to hear from more folks outside of Yahoo on this topic: so far all of the +1 votes have come from Yahoo employees. I'd also love to hear from other folks who have significant investments in both Thrift and Hadoop. Some points to think about: -- You suggest that there is not a lot in Thrift that Avro can leverage. I think you may be overlooking the fact that Thrift has a user base and a community of developers who are very interested in issues of cross-language data serialization and interoperability. Thrift has committers with expertise in a pretty big set of languages and leveraging this could get Avro's functionality onto more languages faster than the current path. Also, there is in fact significant overlap between Hadoop users and Thrift users at this point, as well as significant use of Thrift in more than one Hadoop sub-project. At the code level, Thrift contains a transport abstraction and multiple different transport and server implementations in many different target languages. If there were closer collaboration, Avro could certainly benefit from leveraging the existing ones and any additional contributions in this area would benefit both projects. -- You also suggest that the two are largely disjoint from a technical perspective: "Thrift fundamentally standardizes an API, not a data format. Avro fundamentally is a data format specification, like XML." I agree with the fundamental part but I think that doesn't bring to light enough of what is in common and what is different for purposes of this discussion. Thrift specifies a type system, an API for data formats and transport mechanisms, a schema resolution algorithm, and provides implementations of several distinct data formats and transports. Avro specifies a single data format but it also brings along several other things as well, including a type system, specific RPC mechanism and a schema resolution algorithm. The most significant issue is that both of them specify a type system. At a very minimum I would like to see Avro and Thrift make agreements on that type system. The fact that there is significant existing investment in the Thrift type system by the Thrift community should weigh somewhere in this discussion. Obviously, the technical needs of Avro will also have weight there, but where there is room for choice, the Thrift choices should be respected. Arbitrary changes here will make it unnecessarily painful, perhaps impossible, for Thrift to directly adopt Avro and instead Thrift will be forced to make an "Avro-like" data specification, hampering interoperability for everyone. There may be pitfalls in the other areas of overlap as well that would prevent real interoperability -- let's elucidate them in further discussions. -- Avro appears to have 3 primary features that Thrift does not currently support sufficiently: 1. Schema serialization allowing for compact representation of files containing large numbers of records of identical types 2. Dynamic interpretation of schemas, which improves ease-of-use in dynamic languages (like the Python Hadoop Streaming use case) 3. Lazy partial deserialization to support "projection" Note that features 1 and 3 are independent of whether schemas are dynamicly interpreted or compiled into static bindings. WRT #1: Thrift's DenseProtocol goes some distance towards this although it doesn't go the whole way. Thrift can easily be extended to further compact the DenseProtocol's wire format for special cases where all fields are required. We have had significant discussions on the Thrift list about doing more in this area previously but we couldn't get folks from Hadoop who cared most about this use case to participate with us on capturing a complete set of requirements and so there was no strong driver for it. WRT #2: I totally understand the case you make for dynamic interpretation in ad hoc data processing. I would love to see Thrift enhanced to do this kind of thing. WRT #3: Partial deserialization seems like a really useful feature for several use cases, not just for "projection". I think Thrift could and should be extended to support this functionality, and it should be available for both static bindings and dynamic schema interpretation via field names and field IDs where possible. -- You state: "Perhaps Thrift could be augmented to support Avro's JSON schemas and serialization. Then it could interoperate with other Avro-based systems. But then Thrift would have yet another serialization format, that every language would need to implement for it to be useful..." First, that "Perhaps" hides a lot of complexity and unless that is hashed out ahead of time I am pretty sure the real answer will be "Thrift cannot be augmented to support Avro directly but instead could be augmented to support something that looks quite a bit like Avro but differs in mostly unimportant ways." To me that seems like a shame. Furthermore, you say that last part ("Thrift would have yet another serialization format...") like it is a bad thing... Note that it is an explicit design goal of Thrift to allow for multiple different serialization formats so that lots of different use cases can be supported by the same fundamental framework. This is a clear recognition that there is no one-size-fits-all answer for data serialization (fast RPC vs compact archival record data vs human readability, to name a few salient use cases). For a compelling enough use case, there is no reason not to port new protocols across multiple languages (generally done on an as-needed basis by someone who wants that functionality in that language). Another great feature of the protocol abstraction is that it allows data to be seamlessly moved from one serialization format to another as, say, it is read out of archival storage and sent on as RPC. Also, doesn't Avro essentially contain "another serialization format that every language would need to implement for it to be useful"? Seems like the same basic set of work to me, whether it is in Avro or Thrift. -- You state: "Avro fundamentally is a data format specification, like XML. Thrift could implement this specification. The Avro project includes reference implementations, but the format is intended to be simple enough and the specification stable enough that others might reasonably develop alternate, independent implementations." I think this is a bit inaccurate. First there is the issue of type system compatibility that I raised above and the plausibility of satisfying that "could" without refinement and collaboration on Avro's specification. Furthermore, stated goal of the subproject is "for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files". This will bring in quite a bit beyond a reference implementation of a data format specification, especially depending on how many languages you intend to build RPC support for (Java, Python, C++ all mentioned at some point -- others?). I don't think it is unreasonable that the significant proportion of folks in the Hadoop community who are also using Thrift are puzzled about why there isn't more consideration being given to convergence between Avro and Thrift. -- You state: "Also, with the schema, resolving version differences is simplified. Developers don't need to assign field numbers, but can just use names. For performance, one can internally use field numbers while reading, to avoid string comparisons, but developers need no longer specify these, but can use names, as in most software. Here having the schema means we can simplify the IDL and its versioning semantics." The simplification comes simply not having the field IDs in the IDL? I am not sure why having sequential id numbers after each field is considered to be so onerous. I honestly have never heard a single Thrift user complain about this. Anyone doing more than just that is doing something advanced that wouldn't be possible without the field IDs (like renaming a field). I think having to deal with JSON syntax in the Avro IDL is actually more annoying for humans than the application of field IDs, both with the added syntactic punctuation and the increased verbosity. If the field IDs are really so objectionable, Thrift could allow them to be optional for purely dynamic usages. I also don't see why matching names is considered easier than matching numbers, which is essentially what the versioning semantics come down to in the end. Am I missing something here? -- You state: "Would you write parsers for Thrift's IDL in every language? Or would you use JSON, as Avro does, to avoid that?" Here I totally agree with you: a JSON IDL is better for machine parsing than Thrift's current IDL, which is targeted more at human parsing. And given that I agree that some form of dynamic interpretation is a useful feature, I don't see any reason why a JSON version of the IDL couldn't become part of the picture. Furthermore, the Thrift IDL compiler could easily be extended to take this JSON format as both an input (in addition to the current Thrift IDL) and output. An alternative is would just be to have the other languages bind to the Thrift IDL parser directly -- most languages bind to C (granted for some it is easier than others) -- and get back the parsed data structure to interpret off of. -- By making Avro a sub-project of Hadoop, I believe you will succeed in producing an improved version of Hadoop Record IO and a better RPC mechanism than the current Hadoop RPC. However, I don't think that this will result in better general RPC than Thrift and it will certainly be much less performant for RPC in a wide range of applications. Consider an alternative: making Avro more like a sub-project of Thrift or just implementing it directly in Thrift. In that case, I think the end result will be a powerful and flexible "one-stop shop" for data serialization for RPC and archival purposes with the ability to bring both static and dynamic capabilities as needed for particular application purposes. To me this seems like a bigger win for both Hadoop and for Thrift. Thanks for reading through to this point. I look forward to further discussion. Chad From general-return-172-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 17:37:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40012 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 17:37:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 17:37:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 76829 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 17:37:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76760 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 17:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23852 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 06:51:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Chad.Walters@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.214 as permitted sender) From: Chad Walters To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:51:27 -0700 Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Index: Acm2eIiMha+SR8YIcEuSMApUfi2fXgAC5Lx/ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug, First, let me say that I think Avro has a lot of useful features -- feature= s that I would like to see fully supported in Thrift. At a minimum, I would like for us to be able to hash out the details to guarantee that there can really be full interoperability between Avro and Thrift. I am really interested in working cooperatively and collaboratively on this and I am willing to put in significant time on design and communication to help make full interoperability possible (I am unfortunately not able to contribute code directly at this time). Second, I think all of this decision about where Avro should live requires more thought and more discussion. I'd love to hear from more folks outside of Yahoo on this topic: so far all of the +1 votes have come from Yahoo employees. I'd also love to hear from other folks who have significant investments in both Thrift and Hadoop. Some points to think about: -- You suggest that there is not a lot in Thrift that Avro can leverage. I think you may be overlooking the fact that Thrift has a user base and a community of developers who are very interested in issues of cross-language data serialization and interoperability. Thrift has committers with expertise in a pretty big set of languages and leveraging this could get Avro's functionality onto more languages faster than the current path. Also= , there is in fact significant overlap between Hadoop users and Thrift users at this point, as well as significant use of Thrift in more than one Hadoop sub-project. At the code level, Thrift contains a transport abstraction and multiple different transport and server implementations in many different target languages. If there were closer collaboration, Avro could certainly benefit from leveraging the existing ones and any additional contributions in this area would benefit both projects. -- You also suggest that the two are largely disjoint from a technical perspective: "Thrift fundamentally standardizes an API, not a data format. Avro fundamentally is a data format specification, like XML." I agree with the fundamental part but I think that doesn't bring to light enough of what is in common and what is different for purposes of this discussion. Thrift specifies a type system, an API for data formats and transport mechanisms, a schema resolution algorithm, and provides implementations of several distinct data formats and transports. Avro specifies a single data format but it also brings along several other things as well, including a type system, specific RPC mechanism and a schem= a resolution algorithm. The most significant issue is that both of them specify a type system. At a very minimum I would like to see Avro and Thrift make agreements on that type system. The fact that there is significant existing investment in the Thrift type system by the Thrift community should weigh somewhere in this discussion. Obviously, the technical needs of Avro will also have weight there, but where there is room for choice, the Thrift choices should be respected. Arbitrary changes here will make it unnecessarily painful, perhaps impossible, for Thrift to directly adopt Avro and instead Thrift will be forced to make an "Avro-like" data specification, hampering interoperability for everyone. There may be pitfalls in the other areas of overlap as well that would prevent real interoperability -- let's elucidate them in further discussions. -- Avro appears to have 3 primary features that Thrift does not currently support sufficiently: 1. Schema serialization allowing for compact representation of files containing large numbers of records of identical types 2. Dynamic interpretation of schemas, which improves ease-of-use in dynamic languages (like the Python Hadoop Streaming use case) 3. Lazy partial deserialization to support "projection" Note that features 1 and 3 are independent of whether schemas are dynamicly interpreted or compiled into static bindings. WRT #1: Thrift's DenseProtocol goes some distance towards this although it doesn't go the whole way. Thrift can easily be extended to further compact the DenseProtocol's wire format for special cases where all fields are required. We have had significant discussions on the Thrift list about doin= g more in this area previously but we couldn't get folks from Hadoop who care= d most about this use case to participate with us on capturing a complete set of requirements and so there was no strong driver for it. WRT #2: I totally understand the case you make for dynamic interpretation i= n ad hoc data processing. I would love to see Thrift enhanced to do this kind of thing. WRT #3: Partial deserialization seems like a really useful feature for several use cases, not just for "projection". I think Thrift could and should be extended to support this functionality, and it should be availabl= e for both static bindings and dynamic schema interpretation via field names and field IDs where possible. -- You state: "Perhaps Thrift could be augmented to support Avro's JSON schemas and serialization. Then it could interoperate with other Avro-based systems. But then Thrift would have yet another serialization format, that every language would need to implement for it to be useful..." First, that "Perhaps" hides a lot of complexity and unless that is hashed out ahead of time I am pretty sure the real answer will be "Thrift cannot b= e augmented to support Avro directly but instead could be augmented to suppor= t something that looks quite a bit like Avro but differs in mostly unimportan= t ways." To me that seems like a shame. Furthermore, you say that last part ("Thrift would have yet another serialization format...") like it is a bad thing... Note that it is an explicit design goal of Thrift to allow for multiple different serializatio= n formats so that lots of different use cases can be supported by the same fundamental framework. This is a clear recognition that there is no one-size-fits-all answer for data serialization (fast RPC vs compact archival record data vs human readability, to name a few salient use cases)= . For a compelling enough use case, there is no reason not to port new protocols across multiple languages (generally done on an as-needed basis b= y someone who wants that functionality in that language). Another great feature of the protocol abstraction is that it allows data to be seamlessly moved from one serialization format to another as, say, it is read out of archival storage and sent on as RPC. Also, doesn't Avro essentially contain "another serialization format that every language would need to implement for it to be useful"? Seems like the same basic set of work to me, whether it is in Avro or Thrift. -- You state: "Avro fundamentally is a data format specification, like XML. Thrift could implement this specification. The Avro project includes reference implementations, but the format is intended to be simple enough and the specification stable enough that others might reasonably develop alternate, independent implementations." I think this is a bit inaccurate. First there is the issue of type system compatibility that I raised above and the plausibility of satisfying that "could" without refinement and collaboration on Avro's specification. Furthermore, stated goal of the subproject is "for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files". This will bring in quite a bit beyond a reference implementation of a data format specification, especially depending on how many languages you intend to build RPC support for (Java, Python, C++ all mentioned at some point -- others?). I don't think it is unreasonable that the significant proportion of folks in the Hadoop community who are also using Thrift are puzzled abou= t why there isn't more consideration being given to convergence between Avro and Thrift. -- You state: "Also, with the schema, resolving version differences is simplified. Developers don't need to assign field numbers, but can just use names. For performance, one can internally use field numbers while reading, to avoid string comparisons, but developers need no longer specify these, but can use names, as in most software. Here having the schema means we can simplify the IDL and its versioning semantics." The simplification comes simply not having the field IDs in the IDL? I am not sure why having sequential id numbers after each field is considered to be so onerous. I honestly have never heard a single Thrift user complain about this. Anyone doing more than just that is doing something advanced that wouldn't be possible without the field IDs (like renaming a field). I think having to deal with JSON syntax in the Avro IDL is actually more annoying for humans than the application of field IDs, both with the added syntactic punctuation and the increased verbosity. If the field IDs are really so objectionable, Thrift could allow them to be optional for purely dynamic usages. I also don't see why matching names is considered easier than matching numbers, which is essentially what the versioning semantics come down to in the end. Am I missing something here? -- You state: "Would you write parsers for Thrift's IDL in every language? Or would you use JSON, as Avro does, to avoid that?" Here I totally agree with you: a JSON IDL is better for machine parsing tha= n Thrift's current IDL, which is targeted more at human parsing. And given that I agree that some form of dynamic interpretation is a useful feature, = I don't see any reason why a JSON version of the IDL couldn't become part of the picture. Furthermore, the Thrift IDL compiler could easily be extended to take this JSON format as both an input (in addition to the current Thrif= t IDL) and output. An alternative is would just be to have the other languages bind to the Thrift IDL parser directly -- most languages bind to C (granted for some it is easier than others) -- and get back the parsed data structure to interpret off of. -- By making Avro a sub-project of Hadoop, I believe you will succeed in producing an improved version of Hadoop Record IO and a better RPC mechanis= m than the current Hadoop RPC. However, I don't think that this will result i= n better general RPC than Thrift and it will certainly be much less performan= t for RPC in a wide range of applications. Consider an alternative: making Avro more like a sub-project of Thrift or just implementing it directly in Thrift. In that case, I think the end result will be a powerful and flexible "one-stop shop" for data serialization for RPC and archival purposes with the ability to bring both static and dynamic capabilities as needed for particular application purposes. To me this seems like a bigger win for both Hadoop and for Thrift= . Thanks for reading through to this point. I look forward to further discussion. Chad From general-return-173-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 19:13:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89172 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 19:13:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 19:13:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23016 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 19:13:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22937 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 19:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22927 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 19:13:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:13:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.170] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:12:56 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so2217131wfg.2 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:12:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jpyo13yTdEPxVyrj7win3rutTiQyQanhNXbSHrbUmnw=; b=KN6x0SAZuJABIca3BrIFmeGy9Q4aazr2khJGgE+EJZnX/4uKT3t3NTw5OTr7Fcje7F ylTMfkYCIh1BxyzZ0qzoSf0pD7vjYMbplIQsS5bbrZNDfsDPxUoal2bp/z9/7pjb6OwP 45fqmhrm0lCFCzKvIiuYnhcncTpmZhiT/tpKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vXYgfn9f+5YXhIhFIqMmqMCaRJuaveAP02xG3LrZR4ZuFzdoUlFyaWyMjSxNpd2tX/ xS8H0dJi2oxuj6RM2kQrRYOJsiacVMsj3zUeZJgrnLBPrUqslYKu2+jkce2HDCF9PX86 ZhlBjda8Wqbm+LeCrSIWnILeItP+dtGO9edHE= Received: by 10.142.174.13 with SMTP id w13mr1372145wfe.156.1239045155856; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm954963wfc.0.2009.04.06.12.12.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:12:32 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chad Walters wrote: > -- You suggest that there is not a lot in Thrift that Avro can > leverage. I think you may be overlooking the fact that Thrift has a > user base and a community of developers who are very interested in > issues of cross-language data serialization and interoperability. I meant that in terms of common code, not coders. Coders can belong to more than one community but code should generally not. Hadoop Core has become a sprawling community that we're trying to split. It's more productive to have have more, small communities than few large ones. A project needs a handful of active developers, but too many and it becomes ungainly. So, if it's technically possible for a codebase to be distinct, and it can attract enough active developers to sustain itself, that is a preferable structure. > At the code level, Thrift contains a transport abstraction and > multiple different transport and server implementations in many > different target languages. If there were closer collaboration, Avro > could certainly benefit from leveraging the existing ones and any > additional contributions in this area would benefit both projects. The transport and server implementations are indeed an area where code could potentially be shared between Avro and Thrift. Perhaps someone could start a separate project with reusable transport and server implementations to support RPC? In any case, Avro primarily specifies a binary message format, not a full transport. We hope to piggyback off other transport implementations, like HTTP servers, etc. Full transports involve authentication, authorization, encryption, etc., which are outside of the scope of Avro. > The most significant issue is that both of them specify a type > system. At a very minimum I would like to see Avro and Thrift make > agreements on that type system. This makes good sense. It would be good if these were interoperable. Thrift has byte and i16, which Avro does not currently. I'd like to add a fixed primitive type to Avro, where n is the number of bytes and is specified in the schema, so that one could, e.g., define a byte as fixed<1>, i16 as a fixed<2> and md5 as a fixed<16>. Thrift has both lists and sets, Avro has just arrays, which are equivalent to lists (they're ordered). Perhaps Avro could add sets. Are they leveraged heavily in Thrift? I've not heard much call for them in Avro yet. Avro has single-float, Thrift does not. Avro could perhaps lose this. Avro distinguishes UTF-8 text strings from byte strings, while Thrift does not. I am reluctant to lose this distinction. Avro has unions and a null type, while Thrift does not. Does Thrift support recursive data structures? > Furthermore, you say that last part ("Thrift would have yet another > serialization format...") like it is a bad thing... When faced with multiple programming and scripting languages, multiple serialization formats should be discouraged, or one ends up with multiplicative compatibility problems. A single, primary data format would vastly simplify the Hadoop ecosystem. Yes, folks need to be able to easily import and export data, but expecting scripts in arbitrary languages to be able to process data in arbitrary formats seems unwise. > Note that it is > an explicit design goal of Thrift to allow for multiple different > serialization formats so that lots of different use cases can be > supported by the same fundamental framework. That's not a design goal of Avro, which intends to provide a single, well-specified, easy to implement serialization format. This is not in conflict with Thrift, it's just a different goal. > Also, doesn't Avro essentially contain "another serialization format > that every language would need to implement for it to be useful"? > Seems like the same basic set of work to me, whether it is in Avro or > Thrift. None of Thrift's existing formats solve the problems Avro seeks to. Thrift may be able to incorporate Avro's format, if it has good format generalizations, ideally using Avro's code. So there should be little duplication of effort in such an approach. > The simplification comes simply not having the field IDs in the IDL? > I am not sure why having sequential id numbers after each field is > considered to be so onerous. I didn't say it was onerous, I said that, like in most data structure languages (e.g., programming languages), Avro permits folks to name fields with symbolic names alone. In human-authored software, symbolic naming is generally preferable to numeric naming. Is that really a matter of dispute? > If the field IDs are really so > objectionable, Thrift could allow them to be optional for purely > dynamic usages. Optional features increase compatibility complexity and are harder to maintain and test. A Thrift IDL without numbers would not provide versioning features to non-dynamic languages. > I also don't see why matching names is considered easier than > matching numbers, which is essentially what the versioning semantics > come down to in the end. Am I missing something here? They are formally equivalent. For machines, matching numbers is easier, but people usually prefer to operate on names, and names can be automatically mapped to numbers. > Consider an alternative: making Avro more like a sub-project of > Thrift or just implementing it directly in Thrift. I looked into changing Thrift to support Avro's features, and it was very messy. Perhaps someone else could do this more easily. Building Avro as a part of Thrift would take considerably more effort for me and I think offer little more than it does separately. If you feel differently, you are free to fork Avro, start a competitor, provide patches that integrate it into Thrift, or whatever. > In that case, I > think the end result will be a powerful and flexible "one-stop shop" > for data serialization for RPC and archival purposes with the ability > to bring both static and dynamic capabilities as needed for > particular application purposes. To me this seems like a bigger win > for both Hadoop and for Thrift. It could be a floor wax and a dessert topping! Doug From general-return-174-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 20:09:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4697 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 20:09:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 20:09:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 15853 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15776 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15766 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 20:09:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.235] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:09:15 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1932092rvb.29 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:08:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4WOiax8QCDai2E03Wx+qh8VOP12Rr1U371dXILalhJo=; b=W4YxsiTUx6fw5joLSJsRNRnMrl/WeNv2B/hTdlB8aPb+RS92qgIYiVoculL1JCgPTZ s07LpkX94fdKlfZ9R+DgbRtoRuAS3dHv6qr5syBmIrVzuVk52UWte62YOGbrOhqKGltZ TksPIyVRDJ10FGYLoiIlLmK+7KaWkbjdCfRYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wvatToVTtd3GvLogk3kuUwhr5tqO4cvS/Ug0BVsuGW9aJE3XS/2KTfltpA7irgBoDj xlDZLkuKeeIOfoai15DUZcNk4NRvqEd9ckqZQZMceH1AZJyKFwT29edu1rlDBMi3sFKR CaRRbL3UFjiUtH89jrEzOVyYr18Mfr4gdvPgM= Received: by 10.142.178.9 with SMTP id a9mr1384373wff.73.1239048535171; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm7991961wfg.11.2009.04.06.13.08.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:08:52 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chad Walters wrote: > so far all of the +1 votes have come from Yahoo employees. Not quite. Jeff Hammerbacher is with Cloudera. Sameer Paranjpye is with Mechanical Zoo. Dhruba Borthakur is with Facebook. Doug From general-return-175-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 20:26:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9309 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 20:26:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 20:26:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 38854 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38770 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38760 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 20:26:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.133] (HELO sca-es-mail-2.sun.com) (192.18.43.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:26:30 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n36KPvtJ009124 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:26:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KHP00F004L0AK00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.40] ([unknown] [129.150.20.106]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHP005F04R7W880@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:25:54 -0700 From: George Porter Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro In-reply-to: <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> Sender: George.Porter@Sun.COM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <1D314A78-E219-41DC-9900-CABEEE26AC55@Sun.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One thing that you might consider is adding the ability to add path state to the serialization to better support tracing and instrumentation of the RPC layer with Avro. I did something like this with Thrift, where I simply added a "hidden" parameter with a well known, but unused parameter. If the receiver understood the tracing format, it could pull metadata from that parameter, and if not, than it would just ignore it. Based on your description of the "projection" feature, it seems like that would apply here as well. Thanks, -George On Apr 6, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Chad Walters wrote: >> so far all of the +1 votes have come from Yahoo employees. > > Not quite. Jeff Hammerbacher is with Cloudera. Sameer Paranjpye is > with Mechanical Zoo. Dhruba Borthakur is with Facebook. > > Doug > From general-return-176-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 20:39:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12464 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 20:39:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 20:39:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 55374 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:39:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55300 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55290 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 20:39:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:39:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.245.171.18] (HELO EXCHANGE1.agiliti.net) (216.245.171.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:39:23 +0000 Received: from 209.98.197.77 ([209.98.197.77]) by EXCHANGE1.agiliti.net ([216.245.171.17]) via Exchange Front-End Server exchange.digitalnorth.net ([216.245.171.30]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:38:54 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:38:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro From: Brian Forney To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Thread-Index: Acm297LR8XKgmiLqEd6TrwAbY724hg== In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/2/09 5:05 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be > used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop > committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug > +1 From general-return-177-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 20:49:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15151 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 20:49:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 20:49:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 67402 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67317 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 20:49:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67276 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 20:49:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:49:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:49:02 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so2253244wfg.2 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qjciQXmwnBcEXKk+wH2x1Mz3WaY1BW+YumOy6rwVKzc=; b=m9hbx5tyZB+PwGVq+7iR4/ByESKhMPcNojN9N1UPEv79nCoLGlAZ6ykKT8OaPIElfI Y9fhnFH2p5z8vLgF5X6QJJXNkoS8pqU2QSNyhYtIoxgzvtEtivR9+SV3bacRyIdMLjJ6 e/6q9ztHMhSjVwP5x3fbPDn0PY5WlwHkb3ibI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JGtvHR9YcV+8rILB/XtvJzZaqOESazk63zPoTmeCHsRVxl5QmhQHrNxZaATfoC/bWn VmP+VtAoyn1oYYGi4cZGJ5yDhM4tfU+muDvtuO9mqsYEEolKy9enXI/p4nCYADh1hArW 0ej39wIsD2HZVOFxxz4qCWIqJSzBQ1VuTy1Ks= Received: by 10.142.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr1386068wfb.256.1239050921642; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm4865057wff.22.2009.04.06.13.48.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DA6AA6.8010307@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:48:38 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> <1D314A78-E219-41DC-9900-CABEEE26AC55@Sun.com> In-Reply-To: <1D314A78-E219-41DC-9900-CABEEE26AC55@Sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org George Porter wrote: > One thing that you might consider is adding the ability to add path > state to the serialization to better support tracing and instrumentation > of the RPC layer with Avro. Such cross-system tracing would be great, but I think this might best be done as part of request and response metadata, rather than made part of the user's request and response data. You and I worked this nearly through for Hadoop's existing RPC: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4049 Unfortunately, that patch stalled awaiting benchmarks, and now is stale. Avro currently specifies a request and response payload format, but does not say much about metadata. In an HTTP-based transport, tracing might be done through headers. As we adapt Hadoop's optimized RPC transport to support Avro messages we should probably insert a generic metadata layer, analogous to HTTP's headers, to support features such as this. Doug From general-return-178-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 21:03:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19954 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 21:03:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 21:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89413 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 21:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89325 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 21:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89315 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 21:02:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:02:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.132] (HELO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.43.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:02:50 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n36L2Uek015980 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:02:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KHP008005U8ON00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.40] ([unknown] [129.150.20.106]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHP005T36G4W8A0@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:02:28 -0700 From: George Porter Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro In-reply-to: <49DA6AA6.8010307@apache.org> Sender: George.Porter@Sun.COM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: <51A0963D-4522-4D16-95AF-125AFEC150E2@Sun.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> <1D314A78-E219-41DC-9900-CABEEE26AC55@Sun.com> <49DA6AA6.8010307@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > Unfortunately, that patch stalled awaiting benchmarks, and now is > stale. Avro currently specifies a request and response payload > format, but does not say much about metadata. In an HTTP-based > transport, tracing might be done through headers. As we adapt > Hadoop's optimized RPC transport to support Avro messages we should > probably insert a generic metadata layer, analogous to HTTP's > headers, to support features such as this. > > Doug Doug, This would be great. While it is always possible to add extension data to the payload itself, having such support in the transport itself can be quite useful, in my opinion. Especially if there are a variety of different payloads, you don't have to extend each one. -George From general-return-179-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 21:06:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20702 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 21:06:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 21:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 91453 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 21:06:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91383 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 21:06:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91373 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 21:06:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:06:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.9.45] (HELO web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.9.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:06:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 47829 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2009 21:05:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1239051951; bh=x7euSOU1KR6Ls6jEWGoPETDkU/EqCTd7x7QuvN7W+2Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vNC8LkgunDAqIRco9GAY+xDWcSn5ngZo9icwYa4DSZVkdYjn+IbbOFq6fGrx4hjLfbkEBNnnRZ3yBPP3ePi7TL6Ube+2J+cBKqWQdLgfz7ByoIw84a6XNda7o54ASat7h9FmCjkr0AgPRd2LkdXHswwx4htAycvwJuF82+9XVic= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=30yaLiuoNCWrLuPB/ASG5rYml/wRseC7UPgdo9Nc+1xaySAwTtYSCxS2CB4CZ7Gom5Q49JD3vFSUNPe+6PkdoMwVRItCDR9j/Q6CUFUvIoiU59rRi4CCYRQvaTEzx8xqmxGLVgO31dNf5cHWP8fJbYacICuY4lpBQRGs+EIv0D0=; Message-ID: <951605.46755.qm@web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Hzs6qXsVM1k9PaeQIPlKin1DtASR8WJhmFSbqzTKIhYtVDmG5LBbAqFMRWXs6p38_2oxO0x02PLTE7YsedvjtQfzdKolyDuVhd2pMEDtNWR5PYEv8lAkMUWJItvDv33JbUh1fG3X07bXI36M7Uj4hzdgD0jcIi85.ua4LLtDZ9bPYgpxM0gH0FDDHm7ySNTtY.JXi.ACazsP1Q.nRKaHXXmugG87D6RdyMIyUVtyrYvwiV78t6wUCcLHCq1HbAnChPwwD9holwDCNbIft_p3oMYsjBs0WZz0tWAJpwZz6A2IsQ6mC9x3OGw- Received: from [208.84.6.194] by web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:05:51 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Chad Walters Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not to get too technical on you, but: -- I don't see any message from Jeff on this topic -- Sameer has either just left or is still in the process of leaving Yahoo -- Dhruba's message was posted after my message was composed and while I was still having trouble getting my email to be recognized by the subscription system Chad ----- Original Message ---- From: Doug Cutting Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 6, 2009 1:08:52 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Chad Walters wrote: > so far all of the +1 votes have come from Yahoo employees. Not quite. Jeff Hammerbacher is with Cloudera. Sameer Paranjpye is with Mechanical Zoo. Dhruba Borthakur is with Facebook. Doug From general-return-180-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 06 22:18:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59189 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 22:18:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 22:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17159 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 22:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17088 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 22:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17078 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 22:18:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:18:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.226] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:17:51 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1453855rvb.5 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kNuneQmyFMqpE4Ep+60gaXxEuPYZoFpbFI5yg/QK1mo=; b=AniYTR7ZS+Z0t3xf4z2Sgv1/nh95VjKIfcJIRDBsnooJhTiwaovMJe2FrXGs+8UgjS Pu5QULynqagSNTfPA9+bDAPnIBB0Hovpu1E7vbCw3YxruEQQtJUSTRyzIjsaVXJyfcLc 92f6EL1ySxSRKSZf7SgVaT/unInKjnfJj0Cx0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FPG6N4vqpDg5yDo7Y1LTEKHVEVHECPVnL2KWFHP0KAA10bvgHeThGEmSzA/vCFVSUh Yz867SXDL9nJyZ52Cg4sMxEm1x+jEjOj8Kkg1c7d326t9cigePun+bucmi0VKywfPJI4 Texa9PCJdBZJg1EgAMHSkteAvSBteFDI4RDSs= Received: by 10.142.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr1403968wfl.119.1239056250132; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm8158278wff.2.2009.04.06.15.17.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DA7F77.4030107@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:17:27 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA6154.3040006@apache.org> <951605.46755.qm@web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <951605.46755.qm@web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chad Walters wrote: > Not to get too technical on you, but: -- I don't see any message from > Jeff on this topic Sorry, you're right. I inadvertently counted a private response. I'll let Jeff speak in public for himself from now on! Doug From general-return-181-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 00:18:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96281 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 00:18:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 00:18:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 55040 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 00:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54964 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 00:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54954 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 00:18:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:18:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevin.clark@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.29] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:18:29 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1495808yxj.29 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2tKFzS/GnyDEhhNCO5K6GdZ4lKZppze5rnDfte0xidQ=; b=e9aFDGUyNgH63NlibqiN228ThW6t1jxwRg0FhQS1bSX3KKcnUwf5pH7afR+R1iqJjd OyPUSVSc4XDR1ikpdvcpyVRE8513xccH9TV3duQaO3gD25ZrDABIjURbhuJr00rPbc7K 67N/X3hXv2vd00ov/yiixzYJjQrQeJ5WOmoeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SXXkBS519RfG7Ea82MF6N5JEn1NLXzP2R/c5T/FyR1avQI+hljetwqOOZCUHrvHBov QBoHIxRxlv7537oaovNOWT3fo5s6I3a4I2QawLh39I1eDocEf1Q1mToyfEj16T432wzQ 0mzEUKPXYc0noiCYdUD+jZe1FR6sLETfox2Gs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.78.15 with SMTP id f15mr9441564ybl.62.1239063477677; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:17:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro From: Kevin Clark To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Doug, On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Chad Walters wrote: >> >> -- You suggest that there is not a lot in Thrift that Avro can >> leverage. I think you may be overlooking the fact that Thrift has a >> user base and a community of developers who are very interested in >> issues of cross-language data serialization and interoperability. > > I meant that in terms of common code, not coders. =A0Coders can belong to= more > than one community but code should generally not. =A0Hadoop Core has beco= me a > sprawling community that we're trying to split. =A0It's more productive t= o > have have more, small communities than few large ones. =A0A project needs= a > handful of active developers, but too many and it becomes ungainly. =A0So= , if > it's technically possible for a codebase to be distinct, and it can attra= ct > enough active developers to sustain itself, that is a preferable structur= e. I agree with you in general, but cross language libraries require larger communities than other projects. It's non-trivial to gather groups of coders to support each language the project chooses to include. Right now Thrift has some level of support for a dozen languages. We've been really very active in the last several months, and devs have come out of the woodwork to extend their favorite language(s) binding(s). The overhead for those people (or some equivalent group) to pay attention to another mailing list, another bug tracker, another irc channel, and another community isn't trivial. I understand that developing the code itself may be more convenient for some, but I think that the community that supports the code is what really counts. If we can share that, and still achieve our goals, I think we'll be better off. Of course, this assumes that one of the primary goals of Avro is to be cross language. Is that the case, or have I misunderstood? > Avro has unions and a null type, while Thrift does not. =A0Does Thrift su= pport > recursive data structures? We don't support recursive data structures. We do, however, have a ticket open where we're discussing union support (THRIFT-409). In your post you talk about the problems associated with supporting multiple serialization formats. One of the things I like about Thrift is that even though Thrift supports many different things, application developers aren't at all obligated to. In fact, I don't expect anyone does. It would be perfectly reasonable for Hadoop to specify that they use the Avro data format for transmissions, and the cross language library to provide the API could be Thrift. I think you said something similar in your post, but if not please do clarify. On the "names vs field ids" issue: I know that the Ruby and Java Thrift libraries provide name-based access to this information, and know of no restriction that would keep the others from doing the same. It's just a matter of a little code. >> Consider an alternative: making Avro more like a sub-project of >> Thrift or just implementing it directly in Thrift. > > I looked into changing Thrift to support Avro's features, and it was very > messy. =A0Perhaps someone else could do this more easily. > > Building Avro as a part of Thrift would take considerably more effort for= me > and I think offer little more than it does separately. =A0If you feel > differently, you are free to fork Avro, start a competitor, provide patch= es > that integrate it into Thrift, or whatever. I'd again like to appeal to you that it's the community that's harder to develop than the code, and we've got one already. I also don't see the implementation being especially difficult, but maybe we're looking at different information. I'd be happy to talk with you about it if you're open to the idea. The goals of Avro seem to be consistent with the goals of each of Thrift's contributors who have developed a new protocol. We can already offer the things you've stated you don't want to develop, and I think we've got a lot more to gain working together than we do working separately. That being said, I'm fairly confident we'll be providing an Avro protocol on our own at some point if you're not interested in working together. But I think if we go down that path we're doing a disservice to users of both Thrift and Avro. --=20 Kevin Clark http://glu.ttono.us From general-return-182-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 04:15:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68740 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 04:15:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 04:15:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 93125 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 04:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93037 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 04:15:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93027 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 04:15:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:15:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.238] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:15:25 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2067914rvb.29 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:15:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5P8kAufLI82N0hLu1QYfEvNw0yflNVX0F0xyDIzfClE=; b=ZERc0HU32H6LBEloYk/buicSIIIiU0C9NYd6Y90eMXcGKCu4VNAp0tfwnlURidkVWv RdjKtVIPRUvacQn3pe8AWW55FaBotXvFg9qYXzzWbwLunOELgYmkAy5E3MjRggL7f9/0 Wgm/2jzVz4KRYhwYkoYL1NQlS1Ko8EVW6TG/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LjH9s4wdhHMYrhRMI+7MiSV/0UUkLO2g9ESahqG13KwlsTW1krF++iZF0F6+Iv4S92 sPBibpulmQUR6tXroPFi2ySUYo3YGqAXZHwgnhtEwUhLenHMd8fwyfr43C6OQ1y4sLXv X9jK0NwMIvjhv3rXwZCsBIE7taHYEFm8JUvuI= Received: by 10.143.2.19 with SMTP id e19mr1488764wfi.96.1239077703806; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.106? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm5828488wfa.38.2009.04.06.21.15.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DAD345.9070801@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:15:01 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kevin Clark wrote: > The overhead for those people (or some > equivalent group) to pay attention to another mailing list, another > bug tracker, another irc channel, and another community isn't trivial. Communities form around code, and, if Avro's code is largely disjoint from Thrift's, we should not assume that everyone in the Thrift community cares about Avro or vice versa. > Of course, this assumes that one of the primary goals of Avro is to be > cross language. Is that the case, or have I misunderstood? Yes, that is a goal. > It would be perfectly reasonable for Hadoop to specify that they > use the Avro data format for transmissions, and the cross language > library to provide the API could be Thrift. I think you said something > similar in your post, but if not please do clarify. Yes, perhaps this could be done. I am not convinced that TProtocol is an ideal API for reading and writing Avro data, but it could perhaps be made to work reasonably well. > That being said, I'm fairly confident we'll be providing an Avro > protocol on our own at some point if you're not interested in working > together. But I think if we go down that path we're doing a disservice > to users of both Thrift and Avro. I have never said I was not interested in working together. I've said that I think Avro is fundamentally different from Thrift. Avro is a specific format, Thrift is a generic API for various formats, none like Avro. They might be made to work together. But at this point I see no point in forcing them together. If TProtocol's API is a good match for Avro's format and features, then it should be easy for folks to implement TProtocol using Avro's code and include Avro in Thrift. If the match is not good then perhaps we can adjust Thrift and/or Avro to improve it. Doug From general-return-183-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 08:57:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88445 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 08:57:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 08:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12824 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 08:57:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12741 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 08:57:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 08:57:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:57:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.9.54] (HELO web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.9.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:57:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 90468 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Apr 2009 08:56:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1239094619; bh=gYqu5Mivh89JtXzVs0G6i8TLiLe7hdceQfTJ1PVCLNs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mAftWTIhdmW7rBdGHGPmVYYBRI/0AA1eMKXCl5Heos4N/skMO35o9hvr0U7/FHMse7VUTD7jQjE1t6n82RpTVato3ZGliEVeXSl7P7+lrHmNZS+TPr1qZ84yYnj7ocTC9K/OtJN6OE5UmygbpUXKmY/kFrMh6nQJvyHrRIyQEF4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C711e1b5W3VoJYC3+rHGDugcSeBiqy3iPyzs0cB5h9M9g88mvWnTGVPEOXnF93te4kkCPxe2MXj25QMHS6oKr+QowaR1sm9p3Vqrjty5wB28KOOXophideeYzlRfPmYejJSoTwT/LMRaSqyja3rSmz7qBW7hiHkjfYyKptJVfGM=; Message-ID: <771249.90372.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 660pxz0VM1nXqVL_vWCTlN9V7K7gsFDGOIxEAuQJp3FUMq.DOW5LNxPYPyqabNN5bluoMo.rLNZsmwzJEZdZJaYINcPNisyM4m7BHfKebUixhlP8Wr4FQvhJRxxxDwihkuG4S7CWjNu81uSQ7FK2dABw.lUMsYez3a_2sW2R9fMdr2QBdOgihl.HAiJjq7Uz446WIX3Q0.XnDeaG2oZq_q9DfXkUuHoW99M1KTWgfoDP_r7JhE2qZgYH5GLcSVYVYwTWNfBGpGlVOgsY6.A_at0o9aGEkcBsr2lK5sxsc0nENon3DlwMNyM- Received: from [75.0.178.207] by web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:56:59 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> <49DAD345.9070801@apache.org> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 01:56:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Chad Walters Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49DAD345.9070801@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug, > I have never said I was not interested in working together. That's great -- glad to hear that you are open to collaboration. My concern is that by making a separate (sub)project, however, it may be difficult for us to work together in practice, and in particular it may be difficult for Thrift to leverage Avro's source code. > I've said that I think Avro is fundamentally different from Thrift. > Avro is a specific format, Thrift is a generic API for various formats, none like Avro > They might be made to work together. But at this point I see no point in forcing > them together. I don't think that they are as far apart as you are making it sound with this statement. I do think, however, that it will be very difficult for them to work together properly if the goal of code reuse by Thrift is not an explicit goal of Avro. The easiest way I can come up with to guarantee this is simply to incorporate Avro's feature set into Thrift. If you have other mechanisms for doing this, I'd love to hear them. > If TProtocol's API is a good match for Avro's format and features, > then it should be easy for folks to implement TProtocol using Avro's code and > include Avro in Thrift. If the match is not good then perhaps we can adjust Thrift > and/or Avro to improve it. Absolutely. And right now, there are sufficient differences in the type system and other areas that do require some adjustments, likely some on both sides (although, as I said in my previous email, we need to account for the fact that Thrift has current users to support so backwards-compatibility will need to be a consideration). > Communities form around code, and, if Avro's code is largely disjoint > from Thrift's, we should not assume that everyone in the Thrift > community cares about Avro or vice versa. IMO communities form around shared goals and purposes. Code and designs are created to achieve those purposes; they are also malleable and can be bent to achieve new goals and purposes. If we can find common cause, then we form a common community. You have some features that you want to satisfy for Hadoop's purposes: compact serialization of large files containing many records of identical structure; partial deserialization in support of projection; dynamic interpretation of object schemas; better/more efficient RPC -- all delivered across multiple languages. The first three are also use cases that are of interest to some portion of the Thrift community and the fourth is something that Thrift already provides. Avro at this point is fairly nascent -- you have a design, some code, a couple of developers, and a target group of future users who seem very receptive to what you are working on. You do not have current users, however, and that should mean that you have some degree of flexibility to your design where it doesn't make a material difference to the use cases you are trying to solve. If you are willing to make some modifications to that design and code, the work on Avro could also work directly towards extending Thrift's functionality. I am pretty certain that the Thrift community would be willing to make some reasonable modifications and extensions to Thrift to smooth the way for this as well. I think that by working closely with the Thrift community directly in the Thrift code base, you will get several significant benefits. You will be able to directly leverage the transport and server implementations in Thrift today and any future work in this area is also beneficial. You will have a built-in set of developers and committers across many languages who are already familiar with issues in cross-language serialization (and I agree with Kevin that this is not as portable as you seem to think it is). You will be able to avoid writing lots of parts of an RPC framework in multiple languages that you would need to write to make Avro a stand-alone solution for Hadoop. You would have a significant role in shaping the direction of Thrift to make sure that it remains a strong solution for Hadoop. > I've said that I think Avro is fundamentally different from Thrift. Avro > is a specific format, Thrift is a generic API for various formats, none like Avro. It is clear to me that a slightly modified version of Avro's data format should fit just fine as a Thrift TProtocol implementation. Out of the box this would, of course, only provide for statically generated bindings, but this is enough to satisfy the first of the desired features I described above. The second feature, partial deserialization, is a feature that I would like to see in Thrift for a variety of use cases, not just your projection use case -- for example, message routing where only a message header is deserialized to determine where to pass along an otherwise uninterpreted block of data. This feature is not tightly coupled to the Avro data format in any way. As you have stated, this is possible to do when you have the schema in hand. Note that he static bindings in Thrift are another way that the schema can be transmitted -- in fact, the whole schema could just be retrievable from the bindings directly and fed into whatever mechanism is availabe for dynamic interpretation. But we wouldn't have to go so far as that for field look up by name -- as Kevin pointed out, the Java and Ruby Thrift libraries already have mechanisms for sufficient introspection to accomplish the right kind of lookups, I believe, and the other libraries could be extended to do the same quite easily. So partial deserialization can be supported via either dynamic interpretation and/or via introspection features of the static bindings. To support the second use case, dynamic schema interpretation, there is definitely significant new code to be written. Note that this code is essentially the same code wherever you are writing it. Whatever work you are doing in Avro to be able to dynamically interpret JSON IDL could just be directly implemented in Thrift -- we would just define a JSON version of the Thrift IDL which would look a lot like Avro's IDL. To help further with interoperability we could make the Thrift compiler generate the JSON IDL from the Thrift IDL as another output target. The basic upshot of the above is that it is not that hard to see how Avro could be directly integrated into Thrift if you were willing to entertain that option and I believe that you would see significant benefits that would more than offset the impact to your own ease of development about which you expressed concerns. To touch on a couple specific responses from your previous email to me: >> If the field IDs are really so >> objectionable, Thrift could allow them to be optional for purely >> dynamic usages. > > Optional features increase compatibility complexity and are harder > to maintain and test. A Thrift IDL without numbers would not provide > versioning features to non-dynamic languages. Let me rephrase my suggestion because I think I may not have put it across as clearly as I could have. I am proposing that the IDL would only allow for field IDs to be omitted in the case where the schema was being interpreted dynamically -- no static bindings could be generated from IDL without fully specified field IDs. So if you are only interested in dynamic interpretation, you never have to look at or even think about field IDs. Does that in any way alter your stance here? > It could be a floor wax and a dessert topping! Love the SNL reference, but I don't think it is really appropos. My vision for Thrft with Avro's features folded in as a unified framework for cross-language serialization, covering a variety of use cases, is not jamming two completely heterogeneous things together. I can easily see wanting to take structures represented in one serialization format from disk and send them out over RPC. Thrift provides the means to do this kind of thing seemlessly, with formats appropriate to both use cases, rather than selecting a format that is good for one use case and so-so for the other. Chad ----- Original Message ---- From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 6, 2009 9:15:01 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Kevin Clark wrote: > The overhead for those people (or some > equivalent group) to pay attention to another mailing list, another > bug tracker, another irc channel, and another community isn't trivial. Communities form around code, and, if Avro's code is largely disjoint from Thrift's, we should not assume that everyone in the Thrift community cares about Avro or vice versa. > Of course, this assumes that one of the primary goals of Avro is to be > cross language. Is that the case, or have I misunderstood? Yes, that is a goal. > It would be perfectly reasonable for Hadoop to specify that they > use the Avro data format for transmissions, and the cross language > library to provide the API could be Thrift. I think you said something > similar in your post, but if not please do clarify. Yes, perhaps this could be done. I am not convinced that TProtocol is an ideal API for reading and writing Avro data, but it could perhaps be made to work reasonably well. > That being said, I'm fairly confident we'll be providing an Avro > protocol on our own at some point if you're not interested in working > together. But I think if we go down that path we're doing a disservice > to users of both Thrift and Avro. I have never said I was not interested in working together. I've said that I think Avro is fundamentally different from Thrift. Avro is a specific format, Thrift is a generic API for various formats, none like Avro. They might be made to work together. But at this point I see no point in forcing them together. If TProtocol's API is a good match for Avro's format and features, then it should be easy for folks to implement TProtocol using Avro's code and include Avro in Thrift. If the match is not good then perhaps we can adjust Thrift and/or Avro to improve it. Doug From general-return-184-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 16:17:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57578 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 16:17:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 16:17:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 60604 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 16:17:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60546 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 16:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60536 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 16:17:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:17:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.169] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:17:03 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so2633851wfg.2 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zu0x/iB9s8j2nhAdOQvJ3Brd8/4jB1iFVLA6cKBDVGk=; b=AYDE/Us2hemkPQICNe6WYg5RWtLA8Mj9w2pDoiat+s+4SoTlcRezIjeEXPbVIIa1Y1 Ld3cfarvGZPHIHXiA6Z8EH2hOtNK1N8lMSky8oIjtdrX7GXJIXazh0/eD/912e0pk+tj LuuaEuEgJ4LjHpaKmBVM/daEq+Jq0VW6KSNkM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JGMT8Q5cYaahjaiN16UhHx+7dCLmk/WVRlUqW22FY/KEOJPu1QU2bijDwbrW4N8DNq 6Tyctmg3kICwYOOAmuUVQjEnuwgw+96NGrjXkVWEZ/O8vtDWvMaL6IfYsaayWazs7ZDc SHtKnXPy/PqZYtG5docbPIkOA2vHQ6gT8KIRY= Received: by 10.142.77.11 with SMTP id z11mr72299wfa.277.1239121002031; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm539299wfg.23.2009.04.07.09.16.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DB7C67.3070405@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:16:39 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <417838.23294.qm@web65509.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <49DA5420.4030208@apache.org> <49DAD345.9070801@apache.org> <771249.90372.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <771249.90372.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chad Walters wrote: > I do think, however, that it will be very > difficult for them to work together properly if the goal of code > reuse by Thrift is not an explicit goal of Avro. Code reuse is an explicit goal of Avro. It's an open source project with public APIs intended to expose all of its functionality. > I think that by working closely with the Thrift community directly in > the Thrift code base, you will get several significant benefits. It's not like I did not consider this approach, evolving Thrift to better support my needs. In fact, I considered it for months before abandoning it. I am very familiar with these arguments. I am starting a new serialization project fully aware of the hazards. I feel that, on balance, it is considerably simpler for Avro to be developed separately and that this will not adversely affect its users or its developer community. You may disagree. As volunteers here, we are both free to do as we choose. > To support the second use case, dynamic schema interpretation, there > is definitely significant new code to be written. Note that this code > is essentially the same code wherever you are writing it. This is a primary case for Avro. Without it, Avro's a non-starter. And, as you note, this is new code that must be written for each platform. That's primarily what Avro is. Fitting this code into Thrift would only make it more complicated. > Whatever > work you are doing in Avro to be able to dynamically interpret JSON > IDL could just be directly implemented in Thrift -- we would just > define a JSON version of the Thrift IDL which would look a lot like > Avro's IDL. To help further with interoperability we could make the > Thrift compiler generate the JSON IDL from the Thrift IDL as another > output target. Sure, we could bolt Avro's features onto the side of Thrift, but that doesn't make it easier for me to deliver Avro's features nor any easier for folks to use them. And Thrift doesn't need a second IDL format. It already suffers from too many formats. I seek a single format, not a multitude. > The basic upshot of the above is that it is not that hard to see how > Avro could be directly integrated into Thrift if you were willing to > entertain that option and I believe that you would see significant > benefits that would more than offset the impact to your own ease of > development about which you expressed concerns. I am unlikely to implement it myself, as it does not address my needs. > I am proposing that the IDL would > only allow for field IDs to be omitted in the case where the schema > was being interpreted dynamically -- no static bindings could be > generated from IDL without fully specified field IDs. So if you are > only interested in dynamic interpretation, you never have to look at > or even think about field IDs. Does that in any way alter your stance > here? Not really. It adds an "except on Tuesday" clause in the specification, which is not ideal. In Avro we can generate static bindings without using field ids. >> It could be a floor wax and a dessert topping! > > Love the SNL reference, but I don't think it is really appropos. My > vision for Thrft with Avro's features folded in as a unified > framework for cross-language serialization, covering a variety of use > cases, is not jamming two completely heterogeneous things together. I > can easily see wanting to take structures represented in one > serialization format from disk and send them out over RPC. Thrift > provides the means to do this kind of thing seemlessly, with formats > appropriate to both use cases, rather than selecting a format that is > good for one use case and so-so for the other. I believe that the cost of supporting multiple formats is too high. We differ on that point. I don't think one-stop-shopping is appropriate here, but prefer to provide an ala-carte format. Doug From general-return-185-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 17:27:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90087 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 17:27:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 17:27:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 96757 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 17:27:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96699 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 17:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96689 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 17:27:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:27:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.134 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.134] (HELO mail-qy0-f134.google.com) (209.85.221.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:26:55 +0000 Received: by qyk40 with SMTP id 40so6886215qyk.5 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ND+9QuOAKNQMYfnqxV5Twa47nSlEQ8lvGcmtpVliAo4=; b=MA7hETHwnEk6z+jXieMqjwZGW8qsozMvLmE82v22zeCIwq9sHCh5kDU1tzUgL8kenX WGoslWhJ91/2H+XAS++9F5QOY6oanRE5oj2jP1pv6iBc1tgS2JjAapRXsn3IEBtKTmuE wXaMMeO77VT7s603ePKs+YKXg3yGmLYY2+EiI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vOBCEMQmPy+zbFU8X7veXDuxzycjNsUHzpPSMwv/3rm+4qqIacOivpF6Mn3jHzAyK0 wS4BAB+ZUGIsgBjGqxK0p3IAmJxUuBsq8KQOBpgJzekhongDjLYLGw35FGS/MTmfy9uJ 8lyBAVwiXKhJaF59Pch1/6gKLjdVLItM5em6I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.202 with SMTP id l10mr129193iba.35.1239125194279; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:26:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system= . +1 Tom > =A0My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used fo= r > most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop > committers. =A0We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? =A0Questions? > > Doug > From general-return-186-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 07 20:08:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62334 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 20:08:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 20:08:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83023 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 20:08:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82882 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2009 20:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82858 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2009 20:08:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:08:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.5] (HELO spunkymail-a14.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:08:28 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.3] (adsl-065-013-152-164.sip.rdu.bellsouth.net [65.13.152.164]) by spunkymail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE257190E2C; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <7EDF8CB8-388C-4A44-974E-6977E7AEB396@apache.org> From: Grant Ingersoll To: mahout-user@lucene.apache.org, announce@apache.org, general@lucene.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-9-982163751 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mahout 0.1 Released Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:08:05 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-9-982163751 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache Lucene project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Mahout 0.1. Apache Mahout is a subproject of Apache Lucene with the goal of delivering scalable machine learning algorithm implementations under the Apache license. The first public release includes implementations for clustering, classification, collaborative filtering and evolutionary programming. Highlights include: 1. Taste Collaborative Filtering 2. Several distributed clustering implementations: k-Means, Fuzzy k- Means, Dirchlet, Mean-Shift and Canopy 3. Distributed Naive Bayes and Complementary Naive Bayes classification implementations 4. Distributed fitness function implementation for the Watchmaker evolutionary programming library 5. Most implementations are built on top of Apache Hadoop (http://hadoop.apache.org ) for scalability The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache release site and the m2 ibiblio sync repository. Apache Mahout 0.1 is the project's first release and is focused on establishing a baseline release while attracting more contributors. Details can be found in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310751&styleName=Html&version=12312976 Apache Mahout is available in source form from the following download page: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout/0.1/mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz Apache Mahout is also available for Maven 2 users via the Central Maven Repositories: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/mahout/ http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/mahout/ When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the downloads using signatures found on the Apache site: http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/mahout/KEYS For more information on Apache Mahout, visit the project home page: http://lucene.apache.org/mahout --Apple-Mail-9-982163751-- From general-return-187-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 08 03:34:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33583 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 03:34:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 03:34:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 70656 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 03:34:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70566 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 03:34:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70556 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 03:34:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:34:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:33:55 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so2875924wfg.2 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:33:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NggndcqBnrs7PKxDD35xchQ0ucCZWURMWs1F/ZjT7ho=; b=cN3rhe/qRHZLp6KRArIk7RQI4W3oNF5jSDimDT4pxIzZXFP7tHdlcd/8ZhvtEd0o5x Kye3uQ+x2SAjERGB4XNsrE2rpe3CPCKJWrGuerTLj1bkgO2lpGXooLVsvH3u4uKZhOPX pRmlfhCz5qv6f+phHmTpwg32OZGHr1f7+xKes= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MYMc9XCsZnq7665Lhzzdg4AwGcNjGvAy9Tplf/DICYPWW6Gp42ywZuFhEiKHz1qmFX qyKEL5hfnloV4KxLnbt61l3QlfRBYQ1Odez3sH91d6cxtgejLDlpgFsVRmbtp1imVzTz yqsXsSvleb2sGU4yZ3mrmHekIm9iIoMz4g/qY= Received: by 10.143.6.19 with SMTP id j19mr267875wfi.128.1239161615189; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.106? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm1737305wff.27.2009.04.07.20.33.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:33:32 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To be clear, since a few folks have missed this point: Avro is not complete. At some point in the future, before people start using it as a format for persistent data, we'll need to stop altering its specification, or at least do so much more cautiously. But before then, my immediate goal to move development from private to open so that we have a chance to incorporate feedback before we lock down the specification. For example, several folks have raised the issue of compatibility with Thrift. We certainly want to avoid gratuitous incompatibilities. There are also features clearly missing from Avro that we expect to add before we make a release, like default values, a more efficient RPC handshake, etc. And some features that we might consider removing, if they're not broadly useful and inhibit interoperability, like single-float, which isn't in Thrift, Python, etc. And I expect there will be more such issues raised in the coming weeks and months. But before we can discuss and resolve such issues we need a forum in which to do so. That's all I am after at this point: mailing lists, a bug database, a public source code repository, etc., so that we can start accepting patches, adding committers, etc. Three days have now passed since I initially proposed this, the nominal time for an Apache vote. Is there anyone who strongly opposes taking the development of Avro public as a Hadoop subproject? Only PMC votes are binding, but I would vastly prefer that the broader community also supports this step in the process. Thanks, Doug Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization > system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be > used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop > committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug From general-return-188-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 08 07:04:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27016 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 07:04:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 07:04:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 66434 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 07:04:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66346 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 07:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66336 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 07:04:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:04:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.9.54] (HELO web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.9.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:03:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 87956 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2009 07:03:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1239174214; bh=w35QaqTH0nG8qYndnWWgk38ujKnXmB6REZL3xm1ZX4I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=duW0IJR/u8m9oeQ9cnNdc9K0vka6uxUf8KoWW4ssHmFm52S4W9IjsHVfRh52dlyUss3H9DSSbVNpr8WgjgBTkjs5m38ha6mJuP6xsvalOSID6g5afTJXrkWJ2FuG0RbNkFeUtqWqwT75DotyQLWc/rPiH5zAyLh6JaCRZbYZ4KE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JeT7JgQo1PQKl9JIM69XmAhUjJT4ubiBM79c0NN1P4jiBjsDjVbFPFVANBgdHOJTtyZ7lW88uJEihB1QxQa6qH8NTvAyshJvb37MGL0NpLrgP3uA4ONMBpXXRvqfQ9v42Nxq2rdCGJc0dcPe7OaGVEt1STNazMTaQ5NWKLa9Akg=; Message-ID: <727470.75806.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: P9YkSAgVM1mvUtpVZxLoylItzO99imGhNd0ux0tq6lB1dI_C.p0.LCk3Y5wHeoBzZQKusnt1gzqMIEH5BRYAiFCX5gAT4LcxSSoZGBlVFdNWR8c._.mshB2tGJksTXVGC1wRkJcJJ1o5RH4xmCjruYOT5iqFFyyKYNUSIyIGms2li7h51gnc3OCYrsBMOA1.wPfr4OvQu2N9g11VKoaQLGH.sg_jbANnSYOOvhkPFezbJAOT1lZCR3v7jMNUFQeIO.yS1_gzAB_MXNEf_h99exQzLMZWu6QGmY5O0z3Ct49XM2IIMBsZugqTWqIQmj99okRPCj1TBBOwtmBZ9c8- Received: from [75.0.178.207] by web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:03:33 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:03:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Chad Walters Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug, After our off-list chat, and given that you have indicated that the design is still in flux and that you are open to discussing changes that would permit interoperability, I am not as concerned as I was. My urgency came from concern that once the design was put in place as part of an Apache subproject, rather than open sourced in some other less prominent forum, it would increase the barrier to interoperability; in particular, I was concerned that people would assume the design of the data format was fully-baked and start persisting large amounts of data in some early version of the format, potentially prematurely ossifying the design in a state unsuited for compatibility with Thrift. Given your clarifications around this, my fears clearly were not well-founded. Please accept my apology if I came across as obstructionist. I was honestly advocating on behalf of what I believe is in the best interest our shared user base. Clearly we have some disagreements about the value of some of Thrift's design choices and what those mean for various use cases. I think we also have some differences of opinion about the relative difficulty of implementation versus the value of interoperability. Hopefully, the next few months will afford an opportunity to examine the sources of those disagreements and see if they can be resolved. Sincerely, Chad ----- Original Message ---- From: Doug Cutting To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2009 8:33:32 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro To be clear, since a few folks have missed this point: Avro is not complete. At some point in the future, before people start using it as a format for persistent data, we'll need to stop altering its specification, or at least do so much more cautiously. But before then, my immediate goal to move development from private to open so that we have a chance to incorporate feedback before we lock down the specification. For example, several folks have raised the issue of compatibility with Thrift. We certainly want to avoid gratuitous incompatibilities. There are also features clearly missing from Avro that we expect to add before we make a release, like default values, a more efficient RPC handshake, etc. And some features that we might consider removing, if they're not broadly useful and inhibit interoperability, like single-float, which isn't in Thrift, Python, etc. And I expect there will be more such issues raised in the coming weeks and months. But before we can discuss and resolve such issues we need a forum in which to do so. That's all I am after at this point: mailing lists, a bug database, a public source code repository, etc., so that we can start accepting patches, adding committers, etc. Three days have now passed since I initially proposed this, the nominal time for an Apache vote. Is there anyone who strongly opposes taking the development of Avro public as a Hadoop subproject? Only PMC votes are binding, but I would vastly prefer that the broader community also supports this step in the process. Thanks, Doug Doug Cutting wrote: > I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. > > Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. > > The code is currently at: > > http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ > > To learn more: > > git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro > cat avro/README.txt > > Comments? Questions? > > Doug From general-return-189-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 08 18:04:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92436 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 18:04:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 18:04:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 79800 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 18:04:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79731 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 18:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79721 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 18:04:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:04:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.238] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:03:59 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so202112rvb.29 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nnHohUKjYmz+ZH46AYPhGrWjU7R6JU7nd5QDjMkvXEU=; b=l8viWOBwrw9jAa5S0FFBkPSDazEbAQREkOE1A5PqoHTbHjcLd4+4RNzr/HV/PD5F7B NCIj2XfdxJNRd+tkCULYUcIlV3eseL/Dah3SYZEz6tfR0IaCr3J+/711sGzFlVRUvmnv stQ49mqnOi20qGMU0GSoCUUPdM7NuLLINnojQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NGvtmzHvBK/+qnfHDzHUDt3v+xD/8xgW5w8px9l9vqq9BJzUYaELfESPAfeK2dr2// veJbDZJpW65iunZS5e8mXJ3nsRkPxTl6nN1ybLbE96fkgPacDDS/5lGmgVBDlZ1nVJGF 3FMiLArg8exTwT4v0Qaq+y1yVl5t6yQ1NVCow= Received: by 10.141.4.20 with SMTP id g20mr626692rvi.173.1239213818123; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.21.202.185? (nat-dip5.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm25929643rvb.5.2009.04.08.11.03.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DCE6F7.9050803@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:03:35 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [RESULT] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > Three days have now passed since I initially proposed this, the nominal > time for an Apache vote. Is there anyone who strongly opposes taking > the development of Avro public as a Hadoop subproject? With 6 +1 votes from the PMC (Alan, Dhruba, Nigel, Owen, Tom & me) and no -1 votes, this has passed. I will now ask infrastructure to create the mailing lists, and create the Jira instance, svn repo, website & wiki myself. I'll send a message to this list once this is complete and the project is open for business. Thanks, Doug From general-return-190-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 09 22:33:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2967 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2009 22:33:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Apr 2009 22:33:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 26993 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2009 22:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26909 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2009 22:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26899 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2009 22:33:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.230] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:33:37 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so724306rvb.29 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9J824bGMEJey47JRRTKvbADsL+qZACZK6VC5k8AM99k=; b=LlW8y3vJqpI/Chv3oqlfekikf3xH4fSSDPbTK+b1sTKKMVPaZWOmM+nywdzlhUdFMr Lm2NPIw56sbvT2ZHApzz1rg9P9dhQiGtMasbUCU9pkY2eUn+HuweRW1iW3+mkzui00+A qjVrQvUK08RbK88SEsDc/U9F0zSJiZf3JQkWM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pSAxjK3out5+P+SQtZJsq+x4AJBNaKpGdRIP1AA2HVoeFUniUuP4oNqLv4b3Xb1MsV ypKsSTCVm0mgOT0AdLCaO+rZ3XOU8ZOV5zWDp4aDGS/30PkFxZE27BNo2p1GW78DebZD lKTjpaYtyU+/vf9NC/7ENIiabgEr/bKa7l9hk= Received: by 10.142.157.9 with SMTP id f9mr1029476wfe.341.1239316396061; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm1194825wff.15.2009.04.09.15.33.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49DE77A9.6030804@apache.org> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:33:13 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT] new subproject: Avro References: <49D53694.1050906@apache.org> <49DC1B0C.4000805@apache.org> <49DCE6F7.9050803@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49DCE6F7.9050803@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The mailing lists are now created. If you are interested you may subscribe by sending messages to: avro-dev-subscribe at hadoop.apache.org avro-user-subscribe at hadoop.apache.org avro-commits-subscribe at hadoop.apache.org Please join one or more of these lists if you are interested in Avro. I do not intend to send more messages to general@ about Avro in the near future. I've also uploaded the code to subversion, at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/avro/trunk/ A Jira bug database is at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO I will create a website and Wiki ASAP. Doug Doug Cutting wrote: > Doug Cutting wrote: >> Three days have now passed since I initially proposed this, the >> nominal time for an Apache vote. Is there anyone who strongly opposes >> taking the development of Avro public as a Hadoop subproject? > > With 6 +1 votes from the PMC (Alan, Dhruba, Nigel, Owen, Tom & me) and > no -1 votes, this has passed. I will now ask infrastructure to create > the mailing lists, and create the Jira instance, svn repo, website & > wiki myself. > > I'll send a message to this list once this is complete and the project > is open for business. > > Thanks, > > Doug From general-return-191-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 11 00:29:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26833 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2009 00:29:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2009 00:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 65431 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 00:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65347 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 00:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65337 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2009 00:29:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:29:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sethladd@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.237] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:29:04 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1149182rvb.29 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:28:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iBOJic3sSzLnw3dzY/CdW1GWn15lPhycPXZPss5tU2E=; b=d92n3njc8EeJsppkhhLVGzMTy6wfeY4MefeIyJtto7ITJkjvgPdrbxSvG7cMMgW6pG hVdCdV4Yxg/vmM++IAS0KClveDrVXWcCFtxG/bXtQe79bZKBPllACrGR4y1e88gPWf6s dE7NT3Tlr9jwVGH4XGg0+31VY5yx8pAoezUwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZIyfaBTyToIfK2Mz1KgVxh8IxAn/TZ6vVhoXV4og+BMQdO8uDlt+lJYPrpASBx9eS9 V7VbVCUaM9P977oi8jbCLLJ8TRmo0lyl38CDVYzNzfmVZSZLAxJn9fLDKBiPnBf7aANH H+rYjXrtty20ukNYgDTI+bNpSIsP7Wbh9if8w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.58.20 with SMTP id g20mr1552667wfa.191.1239409724117; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:28:44 -1000 Message-ID: <64f07e2c0904101728g7dfcfeeesc8fd7253b1f409c3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Error initializing attempt From: Seth Ladd To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I am using Hadoop 0.18.3 and Pig 0.2.0 across a small cluster of 4 machines. I am using start-all.sh to boot up the cluster. The HDFS system appears to be working really well. I am able to copy files in and out of the filesystem. However, when I try to submit a Pig job, I am greeted by this exception: 2009-04-10 14:17:27,145 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Starting tracker tracker_sdi-kenglish:localhost/127.0.0.1:37109 2009-04-10 14:17:27,249 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Starting thread: Map-events fetcher for all reduce tasks on tracker_sdi-kenglish:localhost/127.0.0.1:37109 2009-04-10 14:18:07,361 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: LaunchTaskAction: attempt_200904101417_0001_m_000002_0 2009-04-10 14:18:10,353 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Error initializing attempt_200904101417_0001_m_000002_0: java.io.IOException: Call to sladd/208.67.216.132:8020 failed on local exception: java.io.EOFException at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:751) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy5.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:67) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.getFileSystem(Path.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.java:638) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.java:1297) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:937) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.run(TaskTracker.java:1334) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.main(TaskTracker.java:2343) Caused by: java.io.EOFException at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:180) at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:152) at org.apache.hadoop.io.WritableUtils.readString(WritableUtils.java:115) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.receiveResponse(Client.java:509) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:442) What's VERY odd about this, is I don't have a 208.67.216.132 node in my system at all. Where is hadoop getting this IP from? My hadoop-site.xml is below: fs.default.name hdfs://10.0.6.110/ true mapred.job.tracker 10.0.6.110:8012 true hadoop.tmp.dir /opt/cluster/hadoop-tmp true I've confirmed SSH works just fine, ping works, etc. HDFS works as well. Does the above exception have any clues as to why I can't run a Pig MapReduce job? Your help or tips are much appreciated, Seth From general-return-192-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 11 00:52:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31685 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2009 00:52:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2009 00:52:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75096 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 00:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75029 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2009 00:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75019 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2009 00:52:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sethladd@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.168] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:52:06 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1126573wfg.2 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f8FXU3q+BGVRzSzBlkHc7/64F1zicAve2IqPFxXPEhM=; b=j32gOrOElq27UIb3QdIxEKSrgpI9jpRozolxwufl1RZIUvOwI0q7Q3i9Hcs4vVmOCE o1IkRYepkH/H5RxeS/LQKEDo20IYyoeuGQU8B0CwYH/xPTQHvXNr+66Y0EiXDs0Ms0VA s+jxQYjSOiXQmoJXVHxqhEF7cASG8c2CJaQBc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KlB7jd74j5ml6dpdGR9Ag4EO0BAfXnz5LJCXb5/Wf6Xn64Gg9EDj3VPYL7q8qMCCkU NXHnZaG5pdGzfWPn8eXmlmNd+eDWmGTP6FrfzDFi8HzQFAYnqgP0c1Ky51hCMv2e5tX0 No8icpwe6TCi9xKEBCmoZGOLsCDcIBswp4Jso= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.29.17 with SMTP id g17mr1565061wfj.109.1239411105458; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64f07e2c0904101728g7dfcfeeesc8fd7253b1f409c3@mail.gmail.com> References: <64f07e2c0904101728g7dfcfeeesc8fd7253b1f409c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:51:45 -1000 Message-ID: <64f07e2c0904101751x658e3abdke40274eda037015e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Error initializing attempt From: Seth Ladd To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To answer my own question, I added explicit entries for my hosts in the cluster to each /etc/hosts file. Apparently, our DNS was mucking up the name resolution (even though I had specified the IP address in the config files) Lession learned: ensure there's a solid entry for your master node in each slave node's /etc/hosts file. I hope this saves someone else next time it happens. On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Seth Ladd wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Hadoop 0.18.3 and Pig 0.2.0 across a small cluster of 4 > machines. =C2=A0I am using start-all.sh to boot up the cluster. =C2=A0The= HDFS > system appears to be working really well. =C2=A0I am able to copy files i= n > and out of the filesystem. > > However, when I try to submit a Pig job, I am greeted by this exception: > > 2009-04-10 14:17:27,145 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > Starting tracker tracker_sdi-kenglish:localhost/127.0.0.1:37109 > 2009-04-10 14:17:27,249 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > Starting thread: Map-events fetcher for all reduce tasks on > tracker_sdi-kenglish:localhost/127.0.0.1:37109 > 2009-04-10 14:18:07,361 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > LaunchTaskAction: attempt_200904101417_0001_m_000002_0 > 2009-04-10 14:18:10,353 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: > Error initializing attempt_200904101417_0001_m_000002_0: > java.io.IOException: Call to sladd/208.67.216.132:8020 failed on local > exception: java.io.EOFException > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(= Client.java:751) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.ja= va:719) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RP= C.java:216) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy5.getProtocolVe= rsion(Unknown Source) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java= :348) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNa= menode(DFSClient.java:103) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSC= lient.java:172) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem= .initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:67) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileS= ystem(FileSystem.java:1339) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(= FileSystem.java:56) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(F= ileSystem.java:1351) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSys= tem.java:213) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.getFileSystem(Pat= h.java:175) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.locali= zeJob(TaskTracker.java:638) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startN= ewTask(TaskTracker.java:1297) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerS= ervice(TaskTracker.java:937) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.run(Ta= skTracker.java:1334) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.main(T= askTracker.java:2343) > Caused by: java.io.EOFException > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInput= Stream.java:180) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInput= Stream.java:152) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.io.WritableUtils.readStri= ng(WritableUtils.java:115) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.rec= eiveResponse(Client.java:509) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run= (Client.java:442) > > What's VERY odd about this, is I don't have a 208.67.216.132 node in > my system at all. =C2=A0Where is hadoop getting this IP from? > > My hadoop-site.xml is below: > > > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0fs.default.name > =C2=A0 =C2=A0hdfs://10.0.6.110/ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0true > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0mapred.job.tracker > =C2=A0 =C2=A010.0.6.110:8012 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0true > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0hadoop.tmp.dir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0/opt/cluster/hadoop-tmp > =C2=A0 =C2=A0true > =C2=A0 > > > I've confirmed SSH works just fine, ping works, etc. =C2=A0HDFS works as = well. > > Does the above exception have any clues as to why I can't run a Pig > MapReduce job? > > Your help or tips are much appreciated, > Seth > From general-return-193-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 13 17:02:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51517 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2009 17:02:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2009 17:02:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 1133 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2009 17:02:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98917 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2009 17:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87899 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2009 11:28:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ankur.goel@corp.aol.com designates 64.12.143.146 as permitted sender) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:57:26 +0530 (IST) From: Ankur Goel To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <19580353.281239622042153.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <10963932.261239621910111.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Apr 2009 11:27:31.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[D564A140:01C9BC2A] X-AOL-IP: 10.178.121.20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How fast do we expect the new serialization system to be when it replaces existing serialization mechanism in Hadoop RPC? A clear description of the existing bottlenecks and the performance goals for this system would help developers interested in contributing. -Ankur -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:08 -0700 From: Doug Cutting Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org I propose we add a new Hadoop subproject for Avro, a serialization system. My ambition is for Avro to replace both Hadoop's RPC and to be used for most Hadoop data files, e.g., by Pig, Hive, etc. Initial committers would be Sharad Agarwal and me, both existing Hadoop committers. We are the sole authors of this software to date. The code is currently at: http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ To learn more: git clone http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro.git/ avro cat avro/README.txt Comments? Questions? Doug From general-return-194-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 13 17:54:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86923 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 83337 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83310 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83300 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:54:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.164 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.164] (HELO mail-gx0-f164.google.com) (209.85.217.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:54:44 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so4481759gxk.5 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4mayAX8Hz98Jau2OhXnLT4YJd0ilBN98HWcJxkR7Cg0=; b=C8++NyTvq5HHIaXaJlOxYHRRGW6By5+z+iiv6GMRsXBbbUh2VeNUlm9js52rTvsC4/ 2iEPkAu2NCXqNzejMHDLqkMTOTC54j/+/20A3lSWkKjM982eVcsV3nGXmYnnQJwq7Liu 6Ir+RNFvnKXVjFNhIe22XKN7WxpTJvTFyranQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vNQg6LRrLJ9sDHwoloAAlpYyJba73Sa9IGLV7hpJYbrXax2RHRdm4BSD9usYsTHcuk 181qVKAfLeVq7/l5ti6Pv6toJaKd5n+e1H1o5k+8AXmwKMmiXiMYBkJBynASh+xtsMtY K/Mx9uLIwNBwmoxlmtLC4kPcQdGfdp0CQQ+w0= Received: by 10.143.31.4 with SMTP id i4mr2712061wfj.102.1239645262405; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-155-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.155.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 29sm18448746wfg.33.2009.04.13.10.54.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <49E37C4A.4030904@apache.org> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:54:18 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new subproject: Avro References: <19580353.281239622042153.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <19580353.281239622042153.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ankur Goel wrote: > How fast do we expect the new serialization system to be when it > replaces existing serialization mechanism in Hadoop RPC? I hope that Avro will make its first release this summer. Sometime soon after, I hope that we can start moving Hadoop Core's trunk RPC onto Avro. We may start developing an experimental version of Hadoop Core that uses Avro in a branch before Avro is released. This is all speculative, of course. Any detailed discussion of Hadoop Core's future belongs on the core-dev@ and of Avro's future on avro-dev@. > A clear description of the existing bottlenecks and the performance > goals for this system would help developers interested in > contributing. Adding Avro to Hadoop Core is not primarily about performance but rather about compatibility and security. Hadoop's existing RPC is not a performance bottleneck, nor is HDFS's data transfer protocol. However, currently, Hadoop requires that clients and servers must run the exact same version of code, since the existing RPC is not tolerant of protocol changes. We'd like to change that, so that one can run older clients against newer servers and vice versa. Longer term, we'd also like to permit clients in languages other than Java. We intend Avro to provide a change-tolerant, cross-platform RPC solution. We'd also like Hadoop to become more secure. Currently Hadoop uses three different communications mechanisms: RPC, HTTP (for shuffle) and a raw socket-based protocol for HDFS data transfers. It would be best not to have to re-implement security features for each of these. So we hope that we can make Avro perform well enough to replace not only Hadoop's RPC, but also HTTP in the shuffle and the HDFS data transfer protocol. If you're interested in discussing Avro further, I encourage you to join the Avro mailing lists. http://hadoop.apache.org/avro/mailing_lists.html Doug From general-return-195-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 22 21:53:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23123 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2009 21:53:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Apr 2009 21:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 89559 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2009 21:53:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89126 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2009 21:53:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88761 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2009 21:53:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:53:46 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-153-226.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c103.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.103]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n3MLr3DL038643; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=FNEIB6lE71Sj4jtPY07gYcpw0jAD02Oc/YxzwSvfuaTHKvEYbzA3FjowZsexfdjD Message-Id: <0D44727A-01E3-4305-9199-809A68361592@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.20.0 available Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:53:03 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.20.0 contains many improvements, new features, bug fixes and optimizations. For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Hadoop 0.20.0 Release Notes are at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.20.0/releasenotes.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From general-return-196-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 25 00:28:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26016 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2009 00:28:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2009 00:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 15377 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2009 00:28:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15306 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2009 00:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15296 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2009 00:28:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ddbrodsky@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.171] (HELO mail-ew0-f171.google.com) (209.85.219.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:28:03 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1363047ewy.29 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=/LqKsCUBq5U/lExdH2fWve9LaZhDMgUK8ZJ6L+tXzrk=; b=i2u0oMO9h0e+VFCmzD1ladk2c+oNlBEp30zkkUl9Jyq1pLlQ83mHPBGLix6d/NVddj dZ5aiUxDtWjXhUHVbb+Y1WXLWZE6EN8QuesDEDQgPosQL0iNtD7TwpZsGqLJYbE3iaaQ GsdpbDEzwSaYcuCTaUb35j8UOZxrm6hvlvYCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=LB/laiCK3VHmN2UqWgk339KokQiT+PiclTKLQlT7wAFZuntZrq+7I2uEaTi919aw7+ vp6X8Q+lrLBPyxpYdzZjRoEhz57Iu/P4TZBBfNG/r/rjFsC1yuLDr+ntk7PX1NMXr2KL nUMlIWUIXTzDCW17GvqP/H1RZGUhsJ/XBW9jw= Received: by 10.210.56.7 with SMTP id e7mr3014790eba.40.1240619263207; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.141? ([96.49.149.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2561761eyb.15.2009.04.24.17.27.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Dmitry Brodsky To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: problems compiling libhdfs Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:27:38 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I am trying to compile libhdfs on hadoop 0.20 and it's in a number of ways. This is on Fedora Core 10 (64bit). First the configure scripts are saying that fcntl.h is present but are not compileable. Also, all the -m switches are generated without either a 32 or 64 bit designation. Has anybody else has had trouble compiling libhdfs? Thanks! ttyl Dima From general-return-197-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 26 16:31:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66132 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2009 16:31:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2009 16:31:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 51759 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2009 16:31:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51660 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2009 16:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36484 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2009 16:01:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <376978.92484.qm@web306.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: QXryDk0VM1lYxDJXidWKleQd_dOVFgRmP7VDQ8EwtHoOhgWNOOCX._9a4mmevbFux1ol1BbVq6iyXhDUHXi5XdddpYoRP8BKGy8XcxH21nk8bQgm9qORprNEHwhhcrn4_8OrUP4if0Jqm0V2O0viKXGI7TsLXgpwggE6eVEq..lnkaXkGHHQV.AIaE14WDV.JfqXf4KVd81fNS0_IuJFkygZ90ix6uuYMVthJAzLmy4GM1oCB4DXzeG8fV2iipOo8moYbsOEAHgUhM.SqqjLNSCvPjWY0UwIT4HKRu1pJDoJrEdcF.THUqQZirAWzmGst6ra5HdWtbtlfLmR6XWfug-- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.20 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Bonesata Subject: (event) 5/19 How Hadoop Enables Big Data for Every Enterprise >> Christopher Bisciglia To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For registration and more information: http://www.meetup.com/CIO-IT-Executives/calendar/10266376/ Do you have too much data? Do you find yourself discarding data due to performance and cost considerations? Have you heard about Hadoop, but find yourself wondering how it fits with the rest of your systems? Come here the answers to these questions and more at Cloudera's office on Tuesday May 19th. This talk will provide a high level, mildly technical overview of Hadoop and existing architectures for working with large volumes of data. We'll pay special attention to how to augment your existing systems with Hadoop so each can focus on what they do best. Working together, they can deliver a more powerful, scalable, and robust solution. Our speaker: Christophe Bisciglia, Founder, Cloudera From general-return-198-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 28 10:47:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5181 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2009 10:47:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2009 10:47:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 47674 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 10:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47203 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 10:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46987 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2009 10:47:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:47:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown p4:64.236.200.131 (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of ankur.goel@corp.aol.com) Received: from [205.188.249.133] (HELO omr-d35.mx.aol.com) (205.188.249.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:47:26 +0000 Received: from AOLDTCMEH01.ad.office.aol.com (aoldtcmeh01.office.aol.com [10.180.121.20]) by omr-d35.mx.aol.com (v117.7) with ESMTP id MAILOMRD353-7ecf49f6dea571; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:47:01 -0400 Received: from AOLMTCMEI01.ad.office.aol.com ([10.178.3.18]) by AOLDTCMEH01.ad.office.aol.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:47:01 -0400 Received: from localhost ([10.178.3.10]) by AOLMTCMEI01.ad.office.aol.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:46:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:16:51 +0530 (IST) From: Ankur Goel To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <14627742.451240915608268.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <6416040.431240915475918.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Hadoop / MySQL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14_13944117.1240915608267" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2009 10:47:00.0409 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8C05290:01C9C7EE] X-AOL-IP: 10.180.121.20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_14_13944117.1240915608267 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hello hadoop users, Recently I had a chance to lead a team building a log-processing system that uses Hadoop and MySQL. The system's goal was to process the incoming information as quickly as possible (real time or near real time), and make it available for querying in MySQL. I thought it would be good to share the experience and the challenges with the community. Couldn't think of a better place than these mailing lists as I am not much of a blogger :-) The information flow in the system looks something like [Apache-Servers] -> [Hadoop] -> [MySQL-shards] -> [Query-Tools] Transferring from Apache-Servers to Hadoop was quite easy as we just had to organize the data in timely buckets (directories). Once that was running smooth we had to make sure that map-reduce jobs are fired at regular intervals and they pick up the right data. The jobs would then process/aggregate the date and dump the info into MySQL shards from the reducers [we have our own DB partioning set up]. This is where we hit major bottlenecks [any surprises? :-)] The table engine used was InnoDB as there was a need for fast replication and writes but only moderate reads (should eventually support high read rates). The data would take up quite a while to load completely far away from being near-real time. And so our optimization journey begin. 1. We tried to optimize/tune InnoDB parameters like increasing the buffer pool size to 75 % of available RAM. This helped but only till the time DBs were lightly loaded i.e. innoDB had sufficient buffer pool to host the data and indexes. 2. We also realized that InnoDB has considerable locking overhead because of which write concurrency is really bad when you have a large number of concurrent threads doing writes. The default thread concurrency for us was set to no_of_cpu * 2 = 8 which is what the official documentation advises as the optimal limit. So we limited the number of reduce tasks and consequently the number of concurrent writes and boy the performance improved 4x. We were almost there :-) 3. Next thing we tried is the standard DB optimzation techniques like de-normalizing the schema and dropping constraints. This gave only a minor performance improvement, nothing earth shattering. Note that we were already caching connections in reducers to each MySQL shard and partionining logic was embedded into reducers. 4. Falling still short of our performance objectives, we finally we decided to get rid of JDBC writes from reducers and work on an alternative that uses MySQLs LOAD utility. - The processing would partition the data into MySQL shard specific files resident in HDFS. - A script would then spawn processes via ssh on different physical machines to download this data. - Each spawned process just downloads the data for the shard it should upload to. - All the processes then start uploading data in parallel into their respective MySQL shards using LOAD DATA infile. This proved to be the fastest approach, even in the wake of increasing data loads. The enitre processing/loading would complete in less than 6 min. The system has been holding up quite well so far, even though we've had to limit the number of days for which we keep the data or else the MySQLs get overwhelmed. Hope this is helpful to people. Regards -Ankur ------=_Part_14_13944117.1240915608267-- From general-return-199-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 28 14:21:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3227 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2009 14:21:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2009 14:21:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 61882 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 14:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61793 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 14:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61772 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2009 14:21:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.skomoroch@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:21:17 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so1059170gxk.5 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=R+EV03M2ZfQbEO5h8TwYQD280NkAtzKNHcj7Pll7lgk=; b=b/4u2EIMuYJiMTi54hvRt+1jdYZCPcjUuztba8eIprcWFIt9xiaN14AP0WIK5BD0KK wlg6v/nTsXBXTwzIscIOT36epGX5H02Ivv0wQCDWK3RsE6hVLybfT8+JB7hPWvNpUqrb YEb43JtylbFwiDOrKwINwE3reehgrTU1UVXWc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QZiNEmDYod9wn8qJkJbxzz8ExkR5EfHLJACz/xaXWHFRuVS5BXW92tUIz4sOWr64wU Z8T6cXIAa5m6evBH+qkTLh7YMUPvhtFPG4haBfAt5bFGPGxVzrTN1S2/6pu90+vHGguS i335brfMFR2ZaKZgaSxmmnjUZhT+O/XsgfAIg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.146.14 with SMTP id t14mr12354134ybd.85.1240928456036; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14627742.451240915608268.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> References: <6416040.431240915475918.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> <14627742.451240915608268.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop / MySQL From: Peter Skomoroch To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3beb2d0508204689e2b98 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3beb2d0508204689e2b98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for sharing sounds like a nice system - I always advise people to avoid direct SQL inserts for batch jobs / large amounts of data and use MySQL's optimized LOAD utility like you did. Same goes for Oracle... Nothing brings a DB server to its knees like a ton of individual inserts on indexed tables.. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ankur Goel wrote: > > hello hadoop users, > Recently I had a chance to lead a team building a log-processing system > that uses Hadoop and MySQL. The system's goal was to process the incoming > information as quickly as possible (real time or near real time), and make > it available for querying in MySQL. I thought it would be good to share the > experience and the challenges with the community. Couldn't think of a better > place than these mailing lists as I am not much of a blogger :-) > > The information flow in the system looks something like > > [Apache-Servers] -> [Hadoop] -> [MySQL-shards] -> [Query-Tools] > > Transferring from Apache-Servers to Hadoop was quite easy as we just had to > organize the data in timely buckets (directories). Once that was running > smooth we had to make sure that map-reduce jobs are fired at regular > intervals and they pick up the right data. The jobs would then > process/aggregate the date and dump the info into MySQL shards from the > reducers [we have our own DB partioning set up]. This is where we hit major > bottlenecks [any surprises? :-)] > > The table engine used was InnoDB as there was a need for fast replication > and writes but only moderate reads (should eventually support high read > rates). The data would take up quite a while to load completely far away > from being near-real time. And so our optimization journey begin. > > 1. We tried to optimize/tune InnoDB parameters like increasing the buffer > pool size to 75 % of available RAM. This helped but only till the time DBs > were lightly loaded i.e. innoDB had sufficient buffer pool to host the data > and indexes. > > 2. We also realized that InnoDB has considerable locking overhead because > of which write concurrency is really bad when you have a large number of > concurrent threads doing writes. The default thread concurrency for us was > set to no_of_cpu * 2 = 8 which is what the official documentation advises as > the optimal limit. So we limited the number of reduce tasks and consequently > the number of concurrent writes and boy the performance improved 4x. We were > almost there :-) > > 3. Next thing we tried is the standard DB optimzation techniques like > de-normalizing the schema and dropping constraints. This gave only a minor > performance improvement, nothing earth shattering. Note that we were already > caching connections in reducers to each MySQL shard and partionining logic > was embedded into reducers. > > 4. Falling still short of our performance objectives, we finally we decided > to get rid of JDBC writes from reducers and work on an alternative that uses > MySQLs LOAD utility. > - The processing would partition the data into MySQL shard specific files > resident in HDFS. > - A script would then spawn processes via ssh on different physical > machines to download this data. > - Each spawned process just downloads the data for the shard it should > upload to. > - All the processes then start uploading data in parallel into their > respective MySQL shards using LOAD DATA infile. > > This proved to be the fastest approach, even in the wake of increasing data > loads. The enitre processing/loading would complete in less than 6 min. The > system has been holding up quite well so far, even though we've had to limit > the number of days for which we keep the data or else the MySQLs get > overwhelmed. > > Hope this is helpful to people. > > Regards > -Ankur > -- Peter N. Skomoroch 617.285.8348 http://www.datawrangling.com http://delicious.com/pskomoroch http://twitter.com/peteskomoroch --000e0cd3beb2d0508204689e2b98-- From general-return-200-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 28 16:29:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68072 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2009 16:29:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2009 16:29:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 10167 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 16:29:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10128 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 16:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39800 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2009 11:47:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ai/2DDu1tCXIJaNuNmK/87TCHQ/OFf1gO7f6Zrt7lVtj3bdAnP2Xoz00h3QhmJkG Message-ID: <49F6EC77.8040209@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:45:59 +0800 From: Yi-Kai Tsai User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: Hadoop / MySQL References: <14627742.451240915608268.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <14627742.451240915608268.JavaMail.ankur@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ankur Nice share , btw whats your query behavior ? I'm asking because if the query is simple or could be transform/normalized , you could try output to HBase directly? Yi-Kai > hello hadoop users, > Recently I had a chance to lead a team building a log-processing system that uses Hadoop and MySQL. The system's goal was to process the incoming information as quickly as possible (real time or near real time), and make it available for querying in MySQL. I thought it would be good to share the experience and the challenges with the community. Couldn't think of a better place than these mailing lists as I am not much of a blogger :-) > > The information flow in the system looks something like > > [Apache-Servers] -> [Hadoop] -> [MySQL-shards] -> [Query-Tools] > > Transferring from Apache-Servers to Hadoop was quite easy as we just had to organize the data in timely buckets (directories). Once that was running smooth we had to make sure that map-reduce jobs are fired at regular intervals and they pick up the right data. The jobs would then process/aggregate the date and dump the info into MySQL shards from the reducers [we have our own DB partioning set up]. This is where we hit major bottlenecks [any surprises? :-)] > > The table engine used was InnoDB as there was a need for fast replication and writes but only moderate reads (should eventually support high read rates). The data would take up quite a while to load completely far away from being near-real time. And so our optimization journey begin. > > 1. We tried to optimize/tune InnoDB parameters like increasing the buffer pool size to 75 % of available RAM. This helped but only till the time DBs were lightly loaded i.e. innoDB had sufficient buffer pool to host the data and indexes. > > 2. We also realized that InnoDB has considerable locking overhead because of which write concurrency is really bad when you have a large number of concurrent threads doing writes. The default thread concurrency for us was set to no_of_cpu * 2 = 8 which is what the official documentation advises as the optimal limit. So we limited the number of reduce tasks and consequently the number of concurrent writes and boy the performance improved 4x. We were almost there :-) > > 3. Next thing we tried is the standard DB optimzation techniques like de-normalizing the schema and dropping constraints. This gave only a minor performance improvement, nothing earth shattering. Note that we were already caching connections in reducers to each MySQL shard and partionining logic was embedded into reducers. > > 4. Falling still short of our performance objectives, we finally we decided to get rid of JDBC writes from reducers and work on an alternative that uses MySQLs LOAD utility. > - The processing would partition the data into MySQL shard specific files resident in HDFS. > - A script would then spawn processes via ssh on different physical machines to download this data. > - Each spawned process just downloads the data for the shard it should upload to. > - All the processes then start uploading data in parallel into their respective MySQL shards using LOAD DATA infile. > > This proved to be the fastest approach, even in the wake of increasing data loads. The enitre processing/loading would complete in less than 6 min. The system has been holding up quite well so far, even though we've had to limit the number of days for which we keep the data or else the MySQLs get overwhelmed. > > Hope this is helpful to people. > > Regards > -Ankur > -- Yi-Kai Tsai (cuma) , Asia Search Engineering. From general-return-201-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 28 18:45:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54400 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2009 18:45:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2009 18:45:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 22418 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 18:45:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22348 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2009 18:45:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22330 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2009 18:45:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:45:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p0941p@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.167 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.167] (HELO mail-gx0-f167.google.com) (209.85.217.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:45:07 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so1363922gxk.5 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:44:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=hwrkGfIYj89FUz2DtXwcW0Zi1+Xn2m77kGknkBaata8=; b=K74eXcIlYtr+/WffmulQnbpsnAIiOq9Uet9gh61m+eIkEcP5H+lyGPgSNQpszJBVSi U6Y73fhXGZiirmlFlzyj8Aqo21vSwEmxQAMzO8oaKROZDv8wh1j6L3lOkiNzeB46BvOh jgm1oRsuY0NjK9IPrxBHMO4pLT4kXnJ2gt9EE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=lSbybRieHjFTrdvKWfmV7GE+HoD3zlkPQ7NzcycZVBJ8mV6XnlJildFp5rDokB9rdY MwkEr0bXdQxealiVlDBQq/aH3KO6ERr3USr+IKilefgA83zgt7K/BmQMfifALiica4ob qK9yvlZv1EmTBoeYph5A7Kk4p2ZtVh/+Uxz18= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.73.3 with SMTP id a3mr11472903ybl.126.1240944286121; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:44:46 -0700 Message-ID: <9c39bdeb0904281144n7267a25ap6526e537fe52b1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: programming java ee and hadoop at the same time From: George Pang To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f1a4c5c3f0d0468a1db40 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f1a4c5c3f0d0468a1db40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello users, I am trying to program a hadoop powered web application with Eclipse as IDE. Now I have both hadoop perspective and java ee perspective. I wonder if I can have these two together, that I can use the mapper and producers in my servlet. Anyone has experience about this? I will appreciate it. George --001e680f1a4c5c3f0d0468a1db40-- From general-return-202-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 30 21:59:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21206 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 21:59:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 21:59:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 38194 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 21:32:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38140 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 21:32:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38130 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2009 21:32:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:32:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msa@schor.com designates 70.85.130.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.85.130.16] (HELO gateway14.websitewelcome.com) (70.85.130.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:31:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 24578 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 21:35:51 -0000 Received: from gator74.hostgator.com (67.18.27.130) by gateway14.websitewelcome.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 21:35:51 -0000 Received: from [129.34.20.19] (port=40096 helo=[9.2.34.89]) by gator74.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lzdqn-0003qu-RQ for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:31:26 -0500 Message-ID: <49FA18B1.8090701@schor.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:31:29 -0400 From: Marshall Schor User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Implementing compareTo in user-written keys where one extends the other is error prone X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator74.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - hadoop.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schor.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi. It took me a good part of a day to figure out what was going wrong, so I'm sharing this in hopes of learning something from the community or getting hadoop improved to avoid this kind of error for future users. I have 2 key classes, one holds a String, the other one extends that, and adds a boolean. I implemented the first key class (let's call it Super) public class Super implements WritableComparable { . . . public int compareTo(Super o) { // sort on string value . . . } I implemented the 2nd key class (let's call it Sub) public class Sub extends Super { . . . public int compareTo(Sub o) { // sort on boolean value . . . // if equal, use the super: ... else return super.compareTo(o); } With this setup, I used the "Sub" class as a mapper output key, and expected the sort on the boolean value to happen first, then for equal values there, the sort on the string values. What actually happened, was that the sort on the boolean value was skipped completely, and only the sort on the string was done. The reason for this is that (in 0.19.1 release) the WritableCompator instance that is created (using the defaults - no custom Comparator) knows the class is "Sub", and calls from the key value it created, and calls the compareTo method, passing it the other key. Both of these keys are of type Sub. However, they are passed via this code in WritableComparator: public int compare(WritableComparable a, WritableComparable b) { return a.compareTo(b); } Java uses the interface spec for WritableComparable that was declared, in this case WritableComparable, and infers that the arg type for the compareTo is Super. So it "skips" calling the compareTo in Sub, and just calls the one in Super. The workaround is to change the signature of Sub's compareTo method to match the spec in the interface, namely it has to take the Super as an argument, and then cast it to Sub. This seems like a very error prone design. Am I doing something wrong, or can this be improved so that this kind of error is avoided? -Marshall Schor From general-return-203-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 30 22:22:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26112 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 93554 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93468 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93458 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:22:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msa@schor.com designates 69.56.142.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.56.142.19] (HELO gateway01.websitewelcome.com) (69.56.142.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:22:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 31211 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 22:24:03 -0000 Received: from gator74.hostgator.com (67.18.27.130) by gateway01.websitewelcome.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 22:24:03 -0000 Received: from [129.34.20.19] (port=16946 helo=[9.2.34.89]) by gator74.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lzee5-0002N1-Jq for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:22:21 -0500 Message-ID: <49FA249E.3030106@schor.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:22:22 -0400 From: Marshall Schor User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: classpath for finding Key classes X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator74.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - hadoop.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schor.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In hadoop, one can define the classes to be used for Keys and Values. I do this. When I make my giant Jar file holding everything needed for running my application, I include these classes. However, I've discovered that that is not enough it seems (in 0.19.1 version - in case that matters :-) ). The job start up processes is reading the configuration and finding the names of my Key classes, and tries to load them. But it is not using the giant Jar for my job, (yet), so it doesn't find them. A work-around that I've found is to include my giant Jar as the argument to -libjars - that seems to get the class path set up so the startup / validation code can find my classes. This seems wasteful - having the giant jar in two places... Is there a best practices way to do this that's better than this? Thanks. -Marshall Schor From general-return-32-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 05 21:38:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 62619 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2008 21:38:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2008 21:38:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 74971 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:38:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74948 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69968 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2008 21:34:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer:sender; bh=FYA58+Wd1LqYUjreKqfSqjdu/veVhy4O7x06s7DSC9Q=; b=mLRch1lQwf11J+90Yb2GPuPLw2LdZS9euEus2VN3BFWbyM1scCU98Ipb/RcKhdqPkP +duJXVpT7LbKcgs2SnHaLFtvf2bni+Nn7OD/W+wRC0fcVddqQO2x+FZ5ZVFw7DySj8ha aKJrNKsWgYDmawRBFov2OdlKbQI7pjFdvdkvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer:sender; b=plEU8+f4M8APcbaY3wtXt72mO4ero51HrxkD1QGYSDaixqXU7On2aVr10GN24us68c NLrB5Z/Ept65N96IHay1CfNfteFFIt75NiXO3rOOJ99W3feXsKy+8f/1M0bJHFkAVkau Wh4zGuf3VyFNZyB9IvMHqHPwwhWn0Qkt9aoHw= Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: [VOTE] Changing email notifications Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:34:01 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Sender: Owen O'Malley X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, core-dev is pretty overwhelming. I'd like to change the jira notifications so that: jira created -> core-dev other jira traffic -> a new list core-jira@hadoop.apache.org. Most of us have filters like that anyways, and it would make it a lot less intimidating for developers getting started. I'm obviously +1. Thoughts? -- Owen From general-return-33-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 05 21:48:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 66015 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2008 21:48:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2008 21:48:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 88103 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88085 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88070 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2008 21:48:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:48:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:47:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so819530fgb.35 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=q86MPN001ag/mxak0oYdGDLi7G8VdbYml6OvwbfrQUw=; b=vGZU9MIhaL7VODevnJ7W4wmtaOySUP4LceRFFUbtqtk2q2BeUgndzkO9fD3ic/pX6s Dry5M0FR4ay23+svA6045Etdt1nei0FU0oBXPGfkMhlKIQ33bDZF7/+EqGrkMrEC7EPa p4tdHbSwR4g6a0awJxPTJHlZdaYYkfQC+YR3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=EMY+0EdSMA25LKh8Kzlv9TlS+y7wYE4AIHVkah4QEbdJUbQZ+X8dcwIlnsPk8I/nN9 jydkpdrcGoBVxNComhaFXqodmpM6xOhO2FLRyAdJxOI6x+Xi6jR44MyAfFjlzcq2AzwF Mnrvh3E0RFMcJiL3smTnJ2lBausfzfwTKFbnE= Received: by 10.187.175.6 with SMTP id c6mr2607834fap.89.1220651263508; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.235.3 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70809051447x1cd04446pbee68b55764edd0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:47:43 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Changing email notifications In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I like this idea. As long as I listen to core-dev, I can watch JIRAs that I am interested in. All other jira traffic that goes to core-jira@hadoop.apache.org I can safely ignore. +1. dhruba On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, core-dev is pretty overwhelming. I'd like to change the jira > notifications so that: > > jira created -> core-dev > other jira traffic -> a new list core-jira@hadoop.apache.org. > > Most of us have filters like that anyways, and it would make it a lot less > intimidating for developers getting started. I'm obviously +1. Thoughts? > > -- Owen > From general-return-34-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 05 21:51:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 67436 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2008 21:51:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2008 21:51:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 93876 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93854 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2008 21:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93843 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2008 21:51:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:51:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.170] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:50:01 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so635256wfg.2 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=1L88Gup4bNXNZGuMS4sU8sBLDmmKBNyvVwATC3Pd5hg=; b=G6qMLOmKLRt5kUtFmGP7r2vmOL9Olb5TpKnsJp/v7iuhm4+MmSZ+BguzOrPcUZN9x/ Y6dYENKTCKEnLN8NXyy/DcQ02J22h+N53SPzkiTDzJZppZuucQ12emzmPcSSAwNLQVeQ KprH9V3Q/PVRJWrWTrKo2gzX8osBb8zdE8z5U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=PSPbMrNvkY0/8+uxgDktmSEh2NojnbucUp6GrRNeqI2cZRT6Tj6BzfjxxEjB6WCyjs fc8H51+Q+y0waZDixUkMlF+PMAnqQKJyAJUViXLApudfsTth+dF7JrVQrlui1ltWxkVx l9K/VRfG/MBJDcM1VWCTtRllcA1Y0PGuA1vP4= Received: by 10.142.88.4 with SMTP id l4mr4240748wfb.238.1220651422530; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? ( [76.103.191.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1143404wfi.14.2008.09.05.14.50.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48C1A99D.2010505@apache.org> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:50:21 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Changing email notifications References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +0 We really need to split hadoop-core into two or more subprojects Keeping HDFS, MapReduce, Hive, HOD, etc. in a single project is not scalable. Nigel vetoed this because he thinks it will complicate QA, but I think (a) it will simplify so many other people's lives that it is well worth any such cost and (b) the net change in QA effort will be quite moderate. Yes, there will be more projects to QA, but they'll be simpler projects. Modifying the mailing lists is a band aid. It will help those who're not already doing similar things with filters already, but it will cause everyone who does have filters to have to re-jigger their filters. There will be some confusion and time wasted explaining it to folks. So I'm fine with this change being made, but it doesn't really address the glaring problem that we have too much happening under a single roof. Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, core-dev is pretty overwhelming. I'd like to change the jira > notifications so that: > > jira created -> core-dev > other jira traffic -> a new list core-jira@hadoop.apache.org. > > Most of us have filters like that anyways, and it would make it a lot > less intimidating for developers getting started. I'm obviously +1. > Thoughts? > > -- Owen From general-return-35-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 06 00:23:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 52783 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2008 00:23:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2008 00:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 14559 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2008 00:21:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14534 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2008 00:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14493 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2008 00:21:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:21:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:20:45 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m860Iv6d099748 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=HT09FtzqN3VN2rrK+s9Qv3rX7c7xvVr7pMxVEVJ4ihdkXnmVxXXyWBOlpRY3v3KC Message-Id: <09791C7C-1B85-4E89-AFA6-CDD3470EEFDD@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <48C1A99D.2010505@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Changing email notifications Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:18:56 -0700 References: <48C1A99D.2010505@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm coming around on splitting up HDFS and Mapred etc. I'll reply to that thread with a new shinny +1. So that leaves me -1 on this proposal of splitting up the core/jira traffic. Nige On Sep 5, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +0 > > We really need to split hadoop-core into two or more subprojects > Keeping HDFS, MapReduce, Hive, HOD, etc. in a single project is not > scalable. Nigel vetoed this because he thinks it will complicate > QA, but I think (a) it will simplify so many other people's lives > that it is well worth any such cost and (b) the net change in QA > effort will be quite moderate. Yes, there will be more projects to > QA, but they'll be simpler projects. > > Modifying the mailing lists is a band aid. It will help those > who're not already doing similar things with filters already, but it > will cause everyone who does have filters to have to re-jigger their > filters. There will be some confusion and time wasted explaining it > to folks. > > So I'm fine with this change being made, but it doesn't really > address the glaring problem that we have too much happening under a > single roof. > > Doug > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> All, core-dev is pretty overwhelming. I'd like to change the jira >> notifications so that: >> jira created -> core-dev >> other jira traffic -> a new list core-jira@hadoop.apache.org. >> Most of us have filters like that anyways, and it would make it a >> lot less intimidating for developers getting started. I'm obviously >> +1. Thoughts? >> -- Owen From general-return-36-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 06 00:23:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 54370 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2008 00:23:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2008 00:23:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 17519 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2008 00:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17501 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2008 00:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17490 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2008 00:23:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:23:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:22:55 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m860LtV7000928 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:21:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=XMyvUrXTVYlRYEvvNymYVdmGKe0184iy8SNTk2Tq1VjdQcfPGPHr04ltFmMM6YAa Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:21:55 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 15, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> Another benefit is that it would increase the separation of these >> technologies, so that, e.g., folks could more easily run different >> versions of mapreduce on top of different versions of HDFS. >> Currently we make no such guarantees. Folks would be able to >> upgrade to, e.g., the next release of mapreduce on a subset of >> their cluster without upgrading their HDFS. That's not currently >> supported. As we move towards splitting mapreduce into a scheduler >> and runtime, where folks can specify a different runtime per job, >> this will be even more critical. > > Sounds like we simply need to create separate jar files for these > different components. This can be done in the current project. > > Wouldn't the amount of effort to make this split and get it right be > better spent on getting all components of Hadoop to 1.0 (API > stability)? The proposal feels like a distraction to me at this > point in the project. > > Nige I'd like to retract the -1 vote that I gave this proposal earlier. One compelling reason (for me) to split HDFS and Map/Reduce into separate sub-projects is that (hopefully) the *configs* for each layer will be clearer and simpler. So I'm now +1 on this proposal. Nige From general-return-37-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 14 04:42:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 81217 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2008 04:42:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2008 04:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 65290 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2008 04:42:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65262 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2008 04:42:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65251 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2008 04:42:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:42:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.227] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:41:19 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1422102rvb.29 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:41:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer:sender; bh=H0TAVAi8qcOh5Jv71Dkm5hejyCO1k7H+jCmEb6AAe2w=; b=u26+rAYgWdfiKYyEfxGbz+VBGnmxzfXIbpit51Hm8XNnPAuH71cQSvra1BYHLAMvXy szEpNOSgSJACHw9XWaY8BWIxj1GGOfSuoQ13NuWp1wxI8EeqCUIxonliXg0uxjdvn7Af VPSIpv2maMcaYVoSGIAvmhdW7s3/HVn2pBqho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer:sender; b=bushHh4win8GWF1x5J6w3gjN4z0PUyGnkhE8Wli3EcanTi/lSP82nc+xLZInr2oMJ4 nCBqb+TTqmoJqyTE8xjU2UORJL19N9aYxX8O3Hmh+nPrMLQUNdSHND55XTh1HeWci49/ iFs0IFewIrLXN3Twqw42yZmFUGJK5wQBPhLPs= Received: by 10.140.125.1 with SMTP id x1mr3787296rvc.217.1221367310519; Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.65.111.22? ( [209.131.62.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm19633575rvf.3.2008.09.13.21.41.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <7A76F46E-F2B3-406F-8B20-4E0109A003EE@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Hadoop Git repositories available for cloning Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:41:48 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Sender: Owen O'Malley X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, Jukka Zitting has made git repositories that track Apache subversion of all 3 Hadoop subprojects, Core, HBase, and Zookeeper. http://jukka.zitting.name/git/ -- Owen From general-return-38-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:03:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 73706 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:03:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:03:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 67745 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:03:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67723 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67712 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:03:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.191] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:02:34 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so2139326fkx.13 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qjw2js3FcbRWWkpT0QRWD6+Jmd9HSsuvkkpjbEd0O3I=; b=TNw+OWqHbMFV6z/aIz+Y9pZVerkte3NvxmYFGyp0/2VLfUadJl47QJ4vV6rNoiS6qx fwshJr2scnTKjXjesZgQ4NhEmqLhJZjptatYghcS+Ked50MPadgh0QX3W6QR288Qkv8b knmferHq8KWvYmQgCgHMldNSzMXC+J3H/PuWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=t3BeJEqACtGnSocScfILVZLQaA9mBAnMPjTrFhhELoV92TFFUj6qsHO5nCLHNiTFYs U583MKOBTV6GIBpXMFeEOv7M/PF84URGcSV6T/Di2sHJOwlGAh/rNrF4N9HU9pQsr73V 0LY++4IW4THQh0jAL3YywO3LsnbFWWaDcseYY= Received: by 10.187.161.10 with SMTP id n10mr19055fao.43.1221516186413; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.235.3 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70809151503k2cf48770qd6d85d4007eb3196@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:06 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 I would prefer to keep hdfs and mapreduce together because I believe that this arrangement catches incompatability sooner that later. But with the coming of age of both these modules separately, I guess it is time to grow them on their own individual turf! thanks, dhruba On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Aug 15, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> Another benefit is that it would increase the separation of these >>> technologies, so that, e.g., folks could more easily run different versions >>> of mapreduce on top of different versions of HDFS. Currently we make no >>> such guarantees. Folks would be able to upgrade to, e.g., the next release >>> of mapreduce on a subset of their cluster without upgrading their HDFS. >>> That's not currently supported. As we move towards splitting mapreduce >>> into a scheduler and runtime, where folks can specify a different runtime >>> per job, this will be even more critical. >> >> Sounds like we simply need to create separate jar files for these >> different components. This can be done in the current project. >> >> Wouldn't the amount of effort to make this split and get it right be >> better spent on getting all components of Hadoop to 1.0 (API stability)? >> The proposal feels like a distraction to me at this point in the project. >> >> Nige > > I'd like to retract the -1 vote that I gave this proposal earlier. One > compelling reason (for me) to split HDFS and Map/Reduce into separate > sub-projects is that (hopefully) the *configs* for each layer will be > clearer and simpler. > > So I'm now +1 on this proposal. > > Nige > From general-return-39-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:10:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 77716 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:10:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 77428 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:10:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77407 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77396 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:10:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:10:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.64] (HELO QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:09:19 +0000 Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id F5xS1a00K0b6N64A7A9jEP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:09:43 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FA9N1a00Z2SbwD58PA9T2U; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:09:38 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=YC1Ora_X4Q4A:10 a=SLclp5Jn_4gA:10 a=rwkqtkcKwTFGcIoYXY8A:9 a=fwJqHX_d6-LChCBWTrEVw8a1M1QA:4 a=0HbQqGD8AL8A:10 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:09:22 -0700 References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, so in very protracted voting, the results are: PMC +1's: Arun, Dhruba, Doug, Nigel, Owen, Tom So the vote passes. -- Owen From general-return-40-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:21:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 86099 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:21:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:21:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 88238 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:21:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88220 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88209 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:21:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:21:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.96] (HELO QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:20:26 +0000 Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id F8rn1a00l0ldTLk59ALy9D; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:20:58 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FALd1a0042SbwD53QALi2A; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:20:53 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=gz-5--JcPi5Fb0raVxIA:9 a=PKxEtFZ-xcYhgslnY8691zLjSuMA:4 a=MInBT2ynV54A:10 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:20:36 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out Hive into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and seems to be picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. -- Owen From general-return-41-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:39:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 159 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:39:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:39:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4112 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:39:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4091 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4080 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:39:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:39:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.182] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:38:12 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f47so1900044pye.8 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:38:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=/nvUGJhsziXAq8j2hYKH74OwksNShAbH7ozxtqyl0TI=; b=UVAIl/6KF43cXEqzA5rZeUtmmu+7wMokpwzWy3WXpLlN/A+9EiSKXu3ZRDdAWAyAqT 5xpVBekNw0bxkXLVKyZ8cIa0/xaEWhkGnOOMqabJ8qrs5Bj/PNNxN2gfHVgt36NG0Z25 8bbXezFyFHWVYow+02AooOECyJg6jG8jA/qmY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=fKduHgKPNxVm4afiadPWMh6DbjTKgmKiGqHSXLNDszTGcZNQk/4Q9W02OwVkj4X3ot jUJONo2KDfG6SZhC1tl/SjXdA6GlQd40qS9we8F3uS0WGHWxAjqvm4M7KhhCxC5EuG94 kfd+yWelx/hKMJ2y4sFlJN3upJ1ptILK4yXCY= Received: by 10.142.211.1 with SMTP id j1mr59774wfg.313.1221518307176; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? ( [76.103.191.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm22711127wfc.12.2008.09.15.15.38.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48CEE3E2.8030802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:38:26 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Doug Cutting X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1, but is anyone who works on Hive on the PMC? Once we agree to all these splits, scheduling and planning them will sure be fun! Doug Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out > Hive into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and seems > to be picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-42-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:47:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 7995 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:47:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 11673 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:47:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11647 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11636 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:47:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:47:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:46:43 +0000 Received: from OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id F7bi1a0010cQ2SLA6AnFcC; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:47:15 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FAmu1a0082SbwD58WAmzGx; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:47:10 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=E8KE17LsI4cA:10 a=1YF0TBQqt31x0LhLTo8A:9 a=dFMkrW1ZqXQDF1H8UbUA21hy8QsA:4 a=WuK_CZDBSqoA:10 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <48CEE3E2.8030802@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:46:54 -0700 References: <48CEE3E2.8030802@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > +1, but is anyone who works on Hive on the PMC? Dhruba is on the PMC and has been doing most of their commits, so he would be a reasonable proxy. -- Owen From general-return-43-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 22:49:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 9644 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 22:49:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 22:49:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 16267 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:48:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16249 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 22:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16238 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 22:48:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:48:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.154] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:48:01 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1486664fgb.35 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:48:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Cqvbwi5HqyI2ZWPX93Y2SDKjsqOPfPXsh1UxzdouU0c=; b=icOCryUM8/nHGWHo0T+//hUE3om9vkHdHlkdqM1gL6P4YkZLvipirFedZ9t82SYKmJ y+cTUk9UQrT/gpC7OSW8fqQOjVqhjNFzMN5RjZ1nchHIhjDa8F2cQQUBLM0C7Al649L1 v6Ii8WEswVg+YUkayTvi8KHyB2ya8eCiQ4XkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=EMYbO6yFB8Ri7rPwzRkpt4m2IP7SaiU/9nR2JJe59OfjajnPXxkR8w8+Op5NehIxC+ 6rxTh/LMArAsFeCVhVKBSUchcWVYkFZChaFkAagkD12e3s0Nj74npg7D7BKE/ah0illN v6/SDA8WwtCRhBvSS77zfkjGFeK3u3oPLu2Z0= Received: by 10.187.190.6 with SMTP id s6mr23260fap.51.1221518895713; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.187.235.3 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70809151548q19161967mf8c4c215eade2c1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:48:15 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48CEE3E2.8030802@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. This will allow us to have an independent release schedule for Hive. -dhruba On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> +1, but is anyone who works on Hive on the PMC? > > Dhruba is on the PMC and has been doing most of their commits, so he would > be a reasonable proxy. > > -- Owen > From general-return-44-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 23:05:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 25173 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 23:05:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 23:05:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 38170 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 23:05:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38067 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 23:05:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38056 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 23:05:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:05:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:04:13 +0000 Received: from wlan-mc2-145-249.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-73-c69.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.73.69]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id m8FN2Cvp011804 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=t1Ue0w70asphly79JOy5VZ6kvKeN2qVORrg97/OO/YxP46jGZw6doVgk5gVTB6Iz Message-Id: <5D47BCE4-3701-4E4C-BEDA-6871ECDA7A60@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:02:12 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out > Hive into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and > seems to be picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen From general-return-45-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 15 23:18:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 32428 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 23:18:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 23:18:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 46982 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 23:18:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46962 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 23:18:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46951 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 23:18:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:18:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:17:01 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m8FNGBGA049644 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=qg5iisEUg/9ml+6NeSHpIXu8XOtnFYrDaDHEKidzdC6f/5pZleE7Cx1rgz93hJyj Message-Id: <457F4921-353D-479D-B383-378DF7BCA3B5@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:16:11 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sep 15, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out > Hive into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and > seems to be picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > +1 It might be a tad early, but I am reasonably comfortable that Hive will have a healthy community for itself. Arun From general-return-46-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 16 07:54:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 19560 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2008 07:54:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2008 07:54:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77561 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2008 07:54:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77532 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2008 07:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77521 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2008 07:54:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:54:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF processing of domain of enis.soz.nutch@gmail.com) Received: from [66.206.198.176] (HELO Generic33.powerdnn.com) (66.206.198.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:53:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.15] ([85.105.135.220]) by Generic33.powerdnn.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:55:47 -0700 Message-ID: <48CF65F1.4060404@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:53:21 +0300 From: Enis Soztutar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1, Hive already generates lots of traffic, that we were initially concerned about. Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out > Hive into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and > seems to be picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-47-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 17 07:05:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 29193 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2008 07:05:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2008 07:05:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 52628 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 07:05:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52606 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 07:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52590 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2008 07:05:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:05:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.13] (HELO mail-gx0-f13.google.com) (209.85.217.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:04:06 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so19918380gxk.5 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:03:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=iLyDQ/u+4uxeCv8WmHrQrhge/uOy2dytzc+tjXnAFuc=; b=mBI6zovAk7FSyHn5MKBbyasLmhAaD6GeelMHkQXQoU3t2ykCWSCN/VcNfA/NdX97Ir 1ebn5n3NUbYQiQv0g+lJ67XFsjBi89BcWw4O1P+kfPNBuHXOT3xAhKfplZM1HYv6KNdq n0huC92Z2DIY6WDhg7QLHEx6dn2yvjp1kdOS8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=m8x2OGYSivRZbmvRH1pwxs3N4d0EtN1ibgyE0syUeLQofdSmmr1X/DJKdJaQHENnVe UxtmqxunCOJXyxdLyTdMg73aJ4oecc9icLgCwTiH4L7/wDw6yRSelngguD1LXj0G88OY 5ZWFsM9XQ2Jz2XVPwJxM8TP6vUoJBG4a24CTA= Received: by 10.64.88.5 with SMTP id l5mr305303qbb.61.1221635018414; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.81.20 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3bb44c6e0809170003yfe0b1cdv7ba7b13b286f6759@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:03:38 +0200 From: "bryan rasmussen" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: suggestions for using Hadoop/HBase to make a delicious type bookmarking service MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm starting the initial design phase of a service that is similar to the various bookmarking services out there and am thinking about maybe using Hadoop/Hbase. Does anyone here have some suggestions, pointers (aside from the normal faq, documentation) about using Hadoop and/or HBase for building such a solution? Since I am just in the design phase I have to decide what technologies I should use, and their suitability for the tasks at hand. Best Regards, Bryan Rasmussen From general-return-48-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 17 09:43:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 17030 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2008 09:43:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2008 09:43:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 38373 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 09:43:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38262 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 09:43:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38251 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2008 09:43:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:43:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.232] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:42:53 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2837000rvb.29 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aRIlesE5VaDe/pEgCFDXl2pbIR7Ac/1lucla6w5CcwE=; b=VHF5ZJ6KnKdGppG6uWR3M6zsKF8TC903joDdIlEwCKpB4dZHbqJLF83MCyTsDrb87T n12/MeWWn/uw8o71QPhkxkVmSpOwRSMIFpP6f0GJoHJCPerX/oGFN4XmiQ0JA77omNms 4ZkCD9g5mmzMUSwj+Afw8i31jqwoxFw9JsQn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=SE4GHdnntEzGwysaaxeimwxC4oJbwFiG2HyvjKu1vcprqwUR24s7BA3fvabxbopxR/ /HJ/Lzf0cBu0GsK3/dS3R5IJb+jfyqeDV9ScTVae0/Id6uuppTbOlOF8C44Nq76H/j44 u/p+POZ8EEfLu+S9HdkTbCb3FlWg7nO5fVz6Y= Received: by 10.140.170.12 with SMTP id s12mr6399191rve.101.1221644605900; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.188.16 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:43:25 +0100 From: "Tom White" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we create sub-projects for HDFS and Map/Reduce? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <688CEB2A-13EF-4C38-855A-3D6D4C3485B3@yahoo-inc.com> <2DA5A7B1-0CC0-4C4F-BE80-AE1E3C7B47A3@yahoo-inc.com> <489CA74F.8000901@apache.org> <175CD9D8-34A3-4A66-87B0-359EA5E22169@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BTW The initial work to sort out the module dependencies (but not actually split the projects) is being carried out in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3750. Tom On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, so in very protracted voting, the results are: > > PMC +1's: Arun, Dhruba, Doug, Nigel, Owen, Tom > > So the vote passes. > > -- Owen > From general-return-49-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 17 09:45:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 18241 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2008 09:45:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2008 09:45:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 39809 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 09:45:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39783 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 09:45:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39772 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2008 09:45:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:45:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.238] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:44:02 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2837410rvb.29 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:44:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UBJBmg1hf8GsuJ9GVO/+NDuKvQVAWAISZxW7f6Iey3U=; b=eO2Fzbqm2RszyZQPpGspNs4y3NxPrviXxbnoH2CAy0usqoe0o46WslyHN2WsYI24cl aaxossB05ISVLQ8cehQ4bFy5SzTHdGDIfztaC7IoUmtIWjnStU87jMnSmlefs2OqAB99 LR1U/ilJFbuW7PyEXq4/RBmjGPeM9DiZlGwhk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=g7gsU/jQRwIt1lNOudhyqgDxhJ2rCvQAD2WTHWpAyrB6BInGxXRfSkr4I1wxrqDDk9 g897rfV5389kvXQedfW+XwEMJyIKCtOlovL1VCoGFxVGk0t9GH2WcjIFzTf4oqCttAaF Y+U1T6Vr5OhOBhG0bwBsTp0flp/I4zAQDvOgY= Received: by 10.141.53.20 with SMTP id f20mr6396147rvk.128.1221644674978; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.188.16 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:44:34 +0100 From: "Tom White" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out Hive > into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and seems to be > picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > From general-return-50-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 17 12:32:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 14874 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2008 12:32:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2008 12:32:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 60052 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 12:32:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59994 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2008 12:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59973 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2008 12:32:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:32:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tang9527@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.191] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:31:06 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1980391tid.9 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=eIr9ox16pG60mXGA63VFeJmZZt42DQaPF7IlJ0ZCUOE=; b=foz+Y5pLIC9HrOhlmgLpvXwIJifg1DUiE+e5cBAQ0ZIEG9Ja/0vxaeGm5dTqIZ5zc6 4RBJnPYxeqz3aF9R3b8anCGzi4WntJNNeWYnVBNr76Q659TWIqE2csa2JhZXUtcm3Xy3 HzwENF1fWLqjJetYnarPbk3khgcY5O73TDG08= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=q/j5/L60MATk7OK5yLYd3+OISn0QWfbfGzg96fKX8RVgXstl6nUQViTAQjB6UrvKaX AkHDq83d9MUB0E2ZqxOEzML5y1e6bws/2L3V0IcPBQN+/ln4dAMdavvvPldluCuxIaVd YbcdtjrAdSo8byv0/uXloSDxFQRnz26IkMJIs= Received: by 10.110.109.12 with SMTP id h12mr3166104tic.51.1221654697722; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.57.13 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98fa49780809170531s2257c86cj783d28f873ed9d48@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:31:37 +0800 From: tang9527@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_37665_27244116.1221654697709" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_37665_27244116.1221654697709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +1 2008/9/17 Tom White > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out Hive > > into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and seems to be > > picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. > > > > -- Owen > > > -- jim ------=_Part_37665_27244116.1221654697709-- From general-return-51-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 18 01:43:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 51947 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 01:43:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 01:43:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 75530 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 01:43:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75511 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 01:43:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75500 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 01:43:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:43:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RHS_DOB,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of conorharty@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.190] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:42:43 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so3187161fkx.13 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=uetWFyRotXxhYMkVuOC90wJ9G8l7Fd2Cd8sa7Q6keBk=; b=Q7yYPmPTnEjAKA/e0dn74RANoO0r4nfDchQmGeY2s9RHzWw4Tur9wjAcl6DsLB3HqK mEvbmRqwNRFiGvfSTl13U/MY8/j6o3ggZ2ilnK+x05+Bql3rvYh8s1bPPPI6rTWKmpkp vV4nwJ/bRI7rdO5JTldJtsOsKKbGPAygel4+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CRBBy8gWyy2BUzCA3TaMm7lrgx/4WpJgMr0DMxHoMZe8pOpWntNrW0FAZJ3dsJImhk qHp6giAlBEFofJs4rUAjJo3b4o+oVtIoJit90Q1qFaqXv4FlDweY6cK+rqW1hEVeXRFI M4HKWjMEAbtCEqeU19UlnCiMtS3MGhnEj/+CE= Received: by 10.180.214.13 with SMTP id m13mr2408448bkg.75.1221702185345; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.181.32.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <861511ca0809171843y39afc45fie5781e0777c09d44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:43:05 +1100 From: "Conor Harty" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: HBase master does not start MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_842_15776858.1221702185354" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_842_15776858.1221702185354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The problem we have is, if we stop hbase and hadoop and then start hadoop again and try to start hbase, hbase master doesnt start up. Here is the error we get: ERROR master.HMaster: Can not start master java.net.BindException: Problem binding to /127.0.0.1:60000 at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:234) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:960) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HbaseRPC$Server.(HbaseRPC.java:457) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HbaseRPC.getServer(HbaseRPC.java:419) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.(HMaster.java:220) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.(HMaster.java:148) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.LocalHBaseCluster.(LocalHBaseCluster.java:94) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.LocalHBaseCluster.(LocalHBaseCluster.java:77) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.doMain(HMaster.java:794) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.main(HMaster.java:832) ------=_Part_842_15776858.1221702185354-- From general-return-52-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 18 17:56:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 80874 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 17:56:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 17:56:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9265 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 17:56:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9119 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 17:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9097 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 17:56:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:56:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:55:38 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.3] (snvvpn1-10-72-73-c38.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.73.38]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id m8IHsKjP032114; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=nmnXdC8bkz2NI9perKDfYgGpyzOzypHTfh8s1CJAERWR7zkUqTEsrYPRmHtU5OhR Message-Id: <531E543B-B733-4405-B95C-B0C5D3E83974@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.18.1 available Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:54:20 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.18.1 fixes 9 critical bugs in 0.18.0. For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Hadoop 0.18.1 Release Notes are at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.18.1/releasenotes.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From general-return-53-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 20 23:29:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 69189 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2008 23:29:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2008 23:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 72186 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72156 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72145 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2008 23:29:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:29:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.13] (HELO mail-gx0-f13.google.com) (209.85.217.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:28:41 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so1828540gxk.5 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:28:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=soz0G3k1DnjIUVC/y21o0s2ceh6mTjm5Si4NtOKRa3s=; b=xa8aG3tc7acqz3XRFhcuWwRHqDSi/hfoVZvBmKcv6sN1tU5wZeL4UdMjLTJq2gPuzI 3v1dSOcn3jVCHb7Yo1gMMsgn8wIwuasCYdJXksI8o3XoYu1JYK43xtTLt8/4XvOHFbNt czjZRwHN+YhYRbN3Gn3X4QHfUNCmjcJP1bqBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=N7fETNX4B3U8lLT18OcrlR+XOOX5CLd7TR2GbMvp0Qm5f5nTXQGblwQzEKf0xrVVja +2ZAfJFdDqM5frNPhmZUkJXbbxoYXXEuwvFLKA03tX69k+T61BQINZUpqsyE/rffe0Ih DgW1kaQpDzTYqKMDVzeAk6c+KWiREZZk47f5Q= Received: by 10.151.9.1 with SMTP id m1mr2218974ybi.223.1221953293570; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.84.6 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f7f740b0809201628r5c5f8d22re9dcfd101557d1ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:28:13 -0700 From: "Owen O'Malley" Sender: owen.omalley@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Hive into a sub-project In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_62953_29054220.1221953293567" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: c57489c3ab44534b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_62953_29054220.1221953293567 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > With Map/Reduce and HDFS being split up, I think we should split out Hive > into a sub-project also. It is already a large code-base and seems to be > picking up external users. Clearly, I'm +1. With 7 +1 votes from PMC members and no -1 votes, the vote passes. ------=_Part_62953_29054220.1221953293567-- From general-return-54-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 22 17:54:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 58152 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2008 17:54:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2008 17:54:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 30280 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 17:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30264 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 17:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30253 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2008 17:54:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:54:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.203.238.117] (HELO dns.duboce.net) (63.203.238.117) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:53:07 +0000 Received: by dns.duboce.net (Postfix, from userid 1008) id F2D4DC51B; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-26) on dns.duboce.net X-Spam-Level: Received: from durruti.local (durruti.desk.hq.powerset.com [208.84.6.91]) by dns.duboce.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD64C256 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48D7DB79.20509@duboce.net> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:52:57 -0700 From: stack User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HBase master does not start References: <861511ca0809171843y39afc45fie5781e0777c09d44@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <861511ca0809171843y39afc45fie5781e0777c09d44@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Conor: Something must already be running on port 60000 on localhost -- probably an old instance of hbase. It probably wasn't shut down properly. Kill it if you have to. St.Ack P.S. A better place for these questions is the hbase mailing lists. Conor Harty wrote: > The problem we have is, if we stop hbase and hadoop and then start hadoop > again and try to start hbase, hbase master doesnt start up. Here is the > error we get: > > > ERROR master.HMaster: Can not start master > java.net.BindException: Problem binding to /127.0.0.1:60000 > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.bind(Server.java:175) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.(Server.java:234) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.(Server.java:960) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HbaseRPC$Server.(HbaseRPC.java:457) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HbaseRPC.getServer(HbaseRPC.java:419) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.(HMaster.java:220) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.(HMaster.java:148) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.LocalHBaseCluster.(LocalHBaseCluster.java:94) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.LocalHBaseCluster.(LocalHBaseCluster.java:77) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.doMain(HMaster.java:794) > at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.main(HMaster.java:832) > > From general-return-472-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 01 16:47:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41142 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 16:47:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 51466 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51312 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51288 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:47:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:47:42 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.25] (nat-dip10.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n81GlD46022051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A9D5011.3050206@apache.org> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:47:13 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070002090205000206020800" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070002090205000206020800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop PMC, Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. Thanks, Patrick --------------070002090205000206020800 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0).eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0).eml" Message-ID: <4A982047.9070206@apache.org> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:21:59 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Wednesday, September 2.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.2.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick --------------070002090205000206020800-- From general-return-473-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 02 22:04:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40990 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2009 22:04:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2009 22:04:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 34291 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2009 22:04:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34228 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2009 22:04:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34218 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2009 22:04:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.174] (HELO mail-iw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.223.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:04:38 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so517224iwn.3 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TxlX7oqsVHVueWhLsuj3uQh1YN+mkcYZRGWyI9ar/R8=; b=kWrsReAXysoGFJS5MtW2ANi82u1mqX8AXcka+K+IzgmzVpe1IQobup+5BX1ZbZjQEs Zz4/KUdFqXRjbhq94ooT39pKyTDp/ZKw+2NaOykORfIjk/LGSmFA1uvpKVGc9Brjddi8 0qhHmYlcTkn4Hotiv4tquKoF1g6Wday/CeQ4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nJvg24HXnyhOLI8tg+snh/EMP8soV7nn+4TtG/x7ohVgSAtFVBWhkvUptCSS+kI/7J K1jgU6tEf6EmiEN/65rqhmA0f/2rwXpxh51tlnA3Ym5ZBQT+w3N4aQXbXFEFdPdb4Tkr cpmZvhVGm2Oz1uM498RGNBbMNRkUjZLSwd1YY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.40.227 with SMTP id l35mr8736536ibe.28.1251929058037; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 07:04:15 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop executing a custom WRITABLE type From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdf50c9e9eb04729f727d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cdf50c9e9eb04729f727d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi I am executing a custom writable type called as Duo. It is a class that implement the Writable Interface. input is a text file, in which each record consist of 3 words. for ex: hello come here Where are you How are you In the Driver class, Mapper makes the first word as key, and create an object of type Duo from the rest of 2 words. Here is the code below import java.io.IOException; import java.util.*; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSDataOutputStream; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; import org.apache.hadoop.conf.*; import org.apache.hadoop.io.*; import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.*; import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.NullOutputFormat; public class WordCount { public static class Map extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { private Text word = new Text(); public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { String line = value.toString(); StringTokenizer tokenizer = new StringTokenizer(line); while (tokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) { word.set(tokenizer.nextToken()); output.collect(word, new Duo("kumar","kumar")); } } } public static class Reduce extends MapReduceBase implements Reducer { public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { Configuration conf = new Configuration(); FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); Path subjectFile = new Path(key.toString()); FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(subjectFile); while (values.hasNext()) { out.writeChars(key.toString()); Duo d = values.next(); out.writeChars(d.getProperty()); out.writeChars(d.getObject()); } } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { System.out.println("1"); JobConf conf = new JobConf(WordCount.class); conf.setJobName("wordcount"); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(Duo.class); conf.setMapperClass(Map.class); conf.setCombinerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setReducerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(NullOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path(args[0])); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path(args[1])); System.out.println("2"); JobClient.runJob(conf); } } ----------------------------------- code for Duo class is as follows import org.apache.hadoop.io.*; import java.io.*; //public class Duo implements WritableComparable{ public class Duo implements Writable{ public String property; public String object; public Duo(){ set(new String(),new String()); } public Duo(String p, String o){ set(p,o); } public void set(String p, String o){ property=p; object=o; } public String getProperty(){ return property; } public String getObject(){ return object; } public void write(DataOutput out) throws IOException { out.writeChars(property); out.writeChars(object); } public void readFields(DataInput in) throws IOException { property = in.readLine(); object = in.readLine(); } public int hashCode(){ return property.hashCode()* 163 +object.hashCode(); } public boolean equals(Object other){ if (other instanceof Duo){ Duo od = (Duo) other; return property.equals(od.property) && object.equals(od); } return false; } public String toString(){ return property + "\t" + object; } public int compareTo(Duo other){ if (property.compareTo(other.property)==0) return object.compareTo(other.object); else return property.compareTo(other.property); } } When I execute the driver program, the following error is displayed. Please help me explain this problem and if possible suggest some solution also. 1 2 09/09/03 06:40:41 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 09/09/03 06:40:42 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 09/09/03 06:40:42 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 09/09/03 06:40:43 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_200909021822_0046 09/09/03 06:40:44 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 09/09/03 06:40:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_200909021822_0046_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Duo at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:680) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getOutputValueClass(JobConf.java:681) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getMapOutputValueClass(JobConf.java:567) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.(MapTask.java:383) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:193) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2198) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Duo at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:648) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:672) ... 5 more Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Duo at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320) at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClassByName(Configuration.java:628) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:646) ... 6 more I appreciate your efforts to read this message Thanks H. Kumar --0015175cdf50c9e9eb04729f727d-- From general-return-474-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 03 02:53:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8914 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2009 02:53:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2009 02:53:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 37962 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 02:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37870 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 02:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37860 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2009 02:53:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepak.halale@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com) (209.85.219.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:30 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so1443833ewy.36 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:53:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=pXuahYOcbfIynxQQTqY9leit5A2fvZ9JWrVorrtnowg=; b=j+O2IfDnpBvc69Y3GRgcjpPxOjf7Qm85G/Wvks8Dg0pXgRA3iR0NXODpl+2XWTUDhI h+p7GnZr79Y+ic+v5nU6OLdy12saxxIzVpVVIF1c3qlUUD+z8EMAcRAnHdGRlMepb5YW PAUH26+T5QAGwRLsDWfWAGm0AYI60X0zJbFW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=blr72X6cGPXqvRO+WaHpLJOKu2nJzub/TEDNrHewXpRMcXUQp4Ks7ttLd/x38WJNY4 lK+2yUpHkJlmqsC/LhYLYgrCWbBWZ2sEoBo/qMhGnwW4MviCSbBdHm8TmjwpcVVwwOzw Oq0xnFec5thZpCzXjBMk1JCjFw1el7GWfVERA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.3 with SMTP id z3mr1618288wee.94.1251946389312; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:53:09 -0400 Message-ID: <15678300909021953j37a386d8v1e1eec3dfc06f80e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: hadoop configuration help From: Deepak Halale To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2c95d017170472a37b60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6db2c95d017170472a37b60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am trying to configure Hadoop distributed environment . I downloaded hadoop RPM from cloudera, installed it on MACHINE1 (Ubuntu Linux) and MACHINE2 (Fedora Linux) Installed Hadoop RPM on MACHINE2 and Debian Packages on MACHINE1 edited etc/hadoop/conf.pseudo/masters file on MACHINE1 with MACHINE2 name in masters file added MACHINE name in salves file of MACHINE2 under etc/hadoop/conf.my_cluster/slaves (conf.my_cluster is the alternatives on MACHINE2) was able to SSN from MACHINE2 to MACHINE1 I am missing something? getting the following error while running mapreduce job from MACHINE2 09/09/02 22:42:15 INFO dfs.DFSClient: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: File /var/lib/hadoop/cache/hadoop/mapred/system/job_200909021816_0003/job.jar could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1123) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:330) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:481) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:890) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:716) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.addBlock(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.locateFollowingBlock(DFSClient.java:2450) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DFSClient.java:2333) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$1800(DFSClient.java:1745) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient.java:1922) Thanks Deepak --0016e6db2c95d017170472a37b60-- From general-return-475-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 03 04:02:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27107 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2009 04:02:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2009 04:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 91958 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 04:02:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91820 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 04:02:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91796 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2009 04:02:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:02:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 04:02:27 +0000 Received: from [10.72.168.254] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c254.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.254]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n83420aw019767; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A9F3FB8.8070807@apache.org> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:02:00 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040207050502080009000106" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------040207050502080009000106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop PMC, Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. Patrick --------------040207050502080009000106 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="[Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)].eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="[Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)].eml" Delivered-To: phunt1@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.196.16 with SMTP id t16cs156791anf; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.101.10 with SMTP id d10mr4779768wam.61.1251823673533; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from minotaur.apache.org (minotaur.apache.org [140.211.11.9]) by mx.google.com with SMTP id 41si17521378pzk.4.2009.09.01.09.47.53; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of phunt@apache.org designates 140.211.11.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.11.9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of phunt@apache.org designates 140.211.11.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=phunt@apache.org Received: (qmail 41049 invoked by uid 2923); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Delivered-To: phunt@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41044 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 51295 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-phunt@apache.org Received: (qmail 51288 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 16:47:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:47:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:47:42 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.25] (nat-dip10.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n81GlD46022051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A9D5011.3050206@apache.org> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:47:13 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070002090205000206020800" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070002090205000206020800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hadoop PMC, Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. Thanks, Patrick --------------070002090205000206020800 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0).eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0).eml" Message-ID: <4A982047.9070206@apache.org> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:21:59 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Wednesday, September 2.*** http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.2.1-candidate-0/ Should we release this? Patrick --------------070002090205000206020800-- --------------040207050502080009000106-- From general-return-476-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 03 20:34:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28959 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2009 20:34:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2009 20:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 69252 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 20:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69119 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2009 20:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69097 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2009 20:34:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.204] (HELO mail-qy0-f204.google.com) (209.85.221.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:34:47 +0000 Received: by qyk42 with SMTP id 42so327886qyk.10 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:34:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=zLsdp+3OXluzOFPROHBb246fx/suNDVcSxRAx6/aqJw=; b=WyTWDeSNR1i77vTDHF4HZxXaGpy6ahQtuP9SucPLKfS2XKuHEodu5udMogWWSWXqN3 il0sybeOUG/cFxKKUhb2p42IFv5NWX0qCS64I3XjPo79QpEH9NWzUzTdShwTYpbW6efU nMsGae9FqczLHfSUVn0WkTMpJXwhzyTHk96zI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=J3mOFKpD0MUOEw6howYLtD8HZrGzEezm83vL/c+/nJZ20TQOrmPAzJLiU6LjPAti8U zUSCKilryfY6if6rv81pRcDzUGbxKENHYGiZVslxNHf6BRyXYPjW3J5RQKdINy5yuAfK RoQjRj4h/wRhmc/tTV/07ingqqASIK+0nPzuY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.116.140 with SMTP id m12mr3136179qcq.54.1252010064428; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:34:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A9F3FB8.8070807@apache.org> References: <4A9F3FB8.8070807@apache.org> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:34:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aec4bdbffc7e20e6 Message-ID: <7c962aed0909031334x1796077cq97ce52c0202d5523@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]] From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09fa216fe253f940472b24fd2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09fa216fe253f940472b24fd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 I downloaded it, reviewed documentation and then put it in place of the patched ZK in hbase (This candidate includes the patch that made us patch our ZK in the first place). I put up a load on a small cluster with a quorum of three servers. This candidate runs as good/bad as the patched ZK we ship with. St.Ack On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hadoop PMC, > > Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. > > Patrick > > Hadoop PMC, > > Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix > release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release notes > for details. > > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the > *** vote closes EOD on Wednesday, September 2.*** > > http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.2.1-candidate-0/ > > Should we release this? > > Patrick > > > > --00c09fa216fe253f940472b24fd2-- From general-return-477-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 04 16:17:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16454 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2009 16:17:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2009 16:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 79717 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 16:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79646 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 16:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79636 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2009 16:17:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of benjamin.cotton@lehman.com does not designate 68.142.237.108 as permitted sender) Received: from [68.142.237.108] (HELO n1.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (68.142.237.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:17:19 +0000 Received: from [68.142.237.89] by n1.bullet.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2009 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.145] by t5.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2009 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp203.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2009 16:16:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 538781.30740.bm@omp203.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32061 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2009 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.116?) (Benjamin.Cotton@216.27.139.111 with plain) by smtp104.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2009 16:16:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-SMTP: Hfpa_R6swBDM9C7.Z6BBpwK7KXuKR3g- X-YMail-OSG: 2FkPHiYVM1lyL2QuIcm_tjMyZGiCl6P3Y9gRreY91GNj6sM5j0AxUFnN7gfKimfqS.dYE.ckZ_hnxapC5xk_9C7S13BoOvnBlRx.1k2Hgm3szKng6aIMwLzZngKOplSTTpkpjdm8GjHExUsQicEfPcJSe1NYjzUR.S4uiUe4TXSv6G3lSs9ICvEX2i7PAS_Mc_qe6o4YKyOs8vnB3gYqPAu7TYvFqL23_1EIgxBl5_XXHFzEwuePg3vFPI_CDh8QzmVkrrneuviUEb62lTsPU808mMXq4vGRc9ZanaxPi1xNjfAaRfWnJ6bd_efC9IiuHOSGng-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4AA13D78.30304@lehman.com> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:16:56 -0400 From: "benjamin.cotton@lehman.com" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: drivers to bridge familiar SQL queries to Hadoop MapReduce internals? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050208040208000706070501" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------050208040208000706070501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am brand new to Hadoop and have a very newbie question: Is it a Hadoop community priority to build drivers (or layers of drivers) that will help bridge simple, familiar SQL queries to Hadoop MapReduce internals - liberating the application query developer from having to necessarily learn Hadoop-specific technologies, APIs, and tactics? E.g. in the "Hadoop - The Definitive Guide" initial example, I would like to STILL just be able to write Select avg(weatherStationTable.airTemp), max(weatherStationTable.airTemp) from weatherStationTable group by weatherStationTable.year and depend on some Driver (or layer of Drivers) to bridge that familiar SQL relational query to a Hadoop MapReduce job that is deployed across the HDFS (or other Hadoop-specific data hostng layer) to execute in Hadoop and return my result. is the notion of this potential capability off-the mark re: current Hadoop community development priorities? --------------050208040208000706070501-- From general-return-478-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 04 16:35:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23150 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2009 16:35:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2009 16:35:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22067 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 16:35:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22014 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 16:35:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22004 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2009 16:35:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:35:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.225] (HELO mail-fx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.220.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:35:31 +0000 Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so407819fxm.29 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.249.22 with SMTP id w22mr5173625fgh.1.1252082109736; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:35:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AA13D78.30304@lehman.com> References: <4AA13D78.30304@lehman.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:34:49 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100909040934l6fd1ad66uee2ce3f12cadf92@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: drivers to bridge familiar SQL queries to Hadoop MapReduce internals? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Benjamin, This is actually very much on the mark. Take a look at the Hive project -- http://hadoop.apache.org/hive/ , also video at http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training-hive-introduction. Hive is a SQL-like interface developed initially at Facebook for exactly that. Pig is also working on something similar -- see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-824. Cheers, -- Philip On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:16 AM, benjamin.cotton@lehman.com wrote: > > I am brand new to Hadoop and have a very newbie question: =A0Is it a Hado= op > community priority to =A0build drivers (or layers of drivers) that will h= elp > bridge simple, familiar SQL queries to Hadoop MapReduce internals =A0- > liberating the application query developer from having to necessarily lea= rn > Hadoop-specific technologies, APIs, and tactics? > > E.g. in =A0 the "Hadoop - The Definitive Guide" initial example, I would = like > to STILL just be able to write > > Select avg(weatherStationTable.airTemp), max(weatherStationTable.airTemp) > from =A0 weatherStationTable > group by =A0weatherStationTable.year > > and depend on some Driver (or layer of Drivers) to bridge that familiar S= QL > relational query to a Hadoop MapReduce job that is deployed across the HD= FS > (or other =A0Hadoop-specific data hostng layer) to =A0execute in Hadoop a= nd > return my result. > > is the notion of this potential capability off-the mark re: current Hadoo= p > community development priorities? > From general-return-479-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 04 17:29:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54658 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2009 17:29:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2009 17:29:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 78693 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 17:29:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78607 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 17:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78578 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2009 17:29:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:29:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:29:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 54510 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2009 17:28:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.101]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:28:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA14E51.2020409@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 0)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI, I just started a release vote on avro-dev. If you have time, please evaluate the candidate and vote there. Thanks, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 0) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:18:48 -0700 From: Doug Cutting To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a candidate build for Avro release 1.1.0. This fixes bugs in release 1.0.0 and adds a few new features, including comparators and a json encoding. Please download, test and vote by 9 September. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.1.0-candidate-0/ Thanks! Doug From general-return-480-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 05 22:51:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72181 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2009 22:51:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2009 22:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 59506 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 22:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59329 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 22:51:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59176 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2009 22:51:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:51:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:51:41 +0000 Received: from [10.73.152.20] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c20.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.20]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n85MnDth008049; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA2EAE9.5090809@apache.org> Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:49:13 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.2.1. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. If you are upgrading from version 2.2.1 on SourceForge be sure to review the 3.0.1 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.2.1 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.2.1/releasenotes.html Detailed JIRA changlog can be viewed here: http://tinyurl.com/lxltfh Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-481-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 05 22:53:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72421 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2009 22:53:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2009 22:53:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 60485 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 22:53:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60389 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 22:53:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60379 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2009 22:53:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:53:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.34] (HELO web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:53:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 29596 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Sep 2009 22:53:17 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252191197; bh=JNo0D3td3t9oScqMQI+SiYRuhocQlYodi+ptu7UvmXM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ocUpsSn+UmPdHugJJmwxjv7pX8//FkzmmJhqG4Segtj+GRy0JOKXSkidTEGzP60lWEryn+M2Yyaoiy7psBVe54u4Ny8wI2VRHfJAuAn05hAPE65EupnJRUr7SpoLnIIQSaTQEiZsWVOXNgbP0/8tNa18BbGNOeiBy7Yen481x9M= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3FtHIIsEn8DAz9r0prZmSiLHmkeEO8nW/eKz9u0izPbpIjOAAY7oQmtx0NbAXxPAb3q/OXLwKXFjdLTJsbHMmpff51QF+jOi4xoOpZHq13caj7YJW1W7nw1XEX8f0Rgwiqp5DkTk5s+p/E/tJ23zE39PwTh/So0W6HhO4riHVb4=; Message-ID: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ClY7MUYVM1njPl1LBYlkrSollJWPHWAUHzSqiCsgnZoO5l4U.u.ptprY_rT2FMMXv7cj7nFovz6d46g5hm6GPH_RvSH6PpEFYiv377JLBpQmLHfy0N.C.i1hqYsV6JZwYTaQb_WWBS5ezStFkumDijS7eI1hg6DzyYDLuejtCPC_S.QgcqGPpJNGYXlk4ibyMfYePfwzP.5TfxkhZ124KAx4hTzWep9q5BDo359KhDotFDNJunCXK3euUSpyvkF17n2bZSa.JdEl5X2kdeuGyWECL1aKjZFf12NaKyfKD0cL_9k- Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:53:17 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1358.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:53:17 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, I'm a new bie to hadoop and had this question. Normally hadoop spits output data in files in the form : key value If i would like it to only write the value and not the key, what do I have to do ? thanks a lot in advance, Himanshu Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-482-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 05 23:08:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74680 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2009 23:08:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2009 23:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 77713 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 23:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77639 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 23:08:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77629 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2009 23:08:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:08:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stuart.white1@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.185] (HELO mail-px0-f185.google.com) (209.85.216.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:08:19 +0000 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so1535116pxi.23 for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:07:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4i6zioyNGYBUfuSNAmt5is58WjcwLrFwnlm3rLIkvaI=; b=ZVPLXe6scvurc0Ji7XjmoJVlDfEDCd/+v0kgSmvLvZlRR33FPC6h8626rp8tZ4EuZF LTnau+3bX3J7O2T3OH6TNdVv/4bjb3RCe+MtLnXJaXH52w7WOyxR+wSRG2OWjAXf6eJe 965MMg7hkB5hkb9uh97PL6Ukb2hpBxm+Y8KIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ajkI4FU0iWnZajEmrOk3wU8nsvMmZB2rjWgf34pYfUxEjD+fRtCNmUKpnSssw89eMM fPInLzQF1S4D4lv9iF3hm9Xniz52/QxirgW+xHd8bDXP0qKm+VNXct2YxrSh1CIHZ40x 7baoZtcws4jK3Sj+VRtp8GP95jXPrNqs71WjA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.26.42 with SMTP id d42mr421434wfj.219.1252192077915; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:07:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:07:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4af5cd780909051607j2da2c9dci899039ba1ceb56fe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files From: Stuart White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b180fea8a40472dcaf2b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0b180fea8a40472dcaf2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Assuming you're writing plain-text output files using TextOutputFormat, which normally outputs key/value pairs delimited with a Tab, you can emit a null for your key, and neither a key nor the Tab delimiter will get written to the output file. (At least, I'm pretty sure that's right... I'm not where I can run a quick test to verify...) On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I'm a new bie to hadoop and had this question. > Normally hadoop spits output data in files in the form : > key value > > If i would like it to only write the value and not the key, what do I have > to do ? > > > > thanks a lot in advance, > > Himanshu > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > --001636e0b180fea8a40472dcaf2b-- From general-return-483-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 05 23:48:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78491 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2009 23:48:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2009 23:48:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 89416 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 23:48:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89351 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2009 23:48:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89341 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2009 23:48:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:48:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.35] (HELO web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:48:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 13812 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Sep 2009 23:47:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252194479; bh=AKQH4BRi6M6I82PUvtoWt83uBwKByY7crsT2xMVf8vI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R3HXt8TaGoTzZMc2B1taUPFgBjTBrZgyaUpVe1xtqGfRHeDrrD2mKDq9lc860OCh6iT/qzNWXfFE5wuHCn6iKc/WeBtOgBPbmjTW8EC3xG3aTWo6M46zHktItBiPawsaguDtAiW0pWFTCUJmsz8j6/hPE0ipuh0bmsbFeU65sEw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Iq4BeqPhWXQFXZ8FccAa3ndQ837NZsBfvdX7wiurM5Oe4bpZiZi9G95S33Oz4sakX/8ny0qAdVigZQyZlixDf88uIsDo9lNOrtQkaC4vG+QNlIpQjQT6Cni/LdcQi3L4x0E8zC2ubr43Dpiz0YmvK303UpfDF6kcefB0nzjMWOk=; Message-ID: <220039.13746.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Q6r7QlkVM1nKdDv7NSVpwcmmRTXPVDHUf5Y4z1cg0KV0isurpRPhPgjyMpWbDZrjcbnhqX9XVtN12DfRSOuEMDfVCduyO6QwoMjrD_ongSw6KuKNmkzRG.0BDUgaAhUFn6hzaxWouDAyAa_3DDEbIQTMcwIvWeJjPj7rWFgdAIMk7_AGnBeZcYyRQBRDu1K9GPSwV0pVXbpUsDfWKNThyNuJ9qpFyX0KASVJuoYzEQk8dVZRsUJ7bSxPFsbbKvxqONcxq4sDFNd1jbV..vue3z0B6vD07MdAhw3XLjVOwcMghntEWj0UCP4BEI1ebiaPJholZ8Zhoz5cizDAkUIQV2nb9AEzruLLVZKJUhZflvSTVPzBnJHt_JoFFMFMStUlwyXZ Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:47:58 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1358.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 References: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4af5cd780909051607j2da2c9dci899039ba1ceb56fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:47:58 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4af5cd780909051607j2da2c9dci899039ba1ceb56fe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the suggestion. I am using TextOutputFormat and I think that should work. But I use MultipleOutputFormat to output key,value pairs with certain key values to a file with a given name while others to a file with a different name. So if I output null for my keys after the reducer, I guess it would create problems. Any other way you could think of ? Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: Stuart White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:07:57 PM Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files Assuming you're writing plain-text output files using TextOutputFormat, which normally outputs key/value pairs delimited with a Tab, you can emit a null for your key, and neither a key nor the Tab delimiter will get written to the output file. (At least, I'm pretty sure that's right... I'm not where I can run a quick test to verify...) On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I'm a new bie to hadoop and had this question. > Normally hadoop spits output data in files in the form : > key value > > If i would like it to only write the value and not the key, what do I have > to do ? > > > > thanks a lot in advance, > > Himanshu > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > From general-return-484-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 06 19:49:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85580 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2009 19:49:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2009 19:49:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 83605 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:49:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83515 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:49:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83505 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2009 19:49:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:49:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.39] (HELO web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:49:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 25785 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Sep 2009 19:48:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252266519; bh=umNQSJBRKjg82SoTNHTjHnP9yIi5t3ihj/VtehJn5TY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ufZJSvj4zIBUsomoVfKYhp9pD66LVAk+9X2xluOqOqZsoGFiCpwFTna+NYRgbJdlqLOGiol/joNNII9iNXR895+j43Q9WGPwudilzeUpCM73Kg+D9TJKVqvp83XFqlB6jOrdyshSSXgo8+bMtqo/KCTbNzxoHbN293p9+neyj9I= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aJjRLipEFjOGje48hh3Add0vKCF2/ipkqEkOejYG9p3ax4EugcH9A4vVIY2xleT5/FsQuNq4YrmbLDg16YQ9kvFqAO0H7z08IHLX+cVt9Xcc1do2yvfa7R1JJn2tYlvL9rOBRiYYPN+PjyH3zZTcZtMYBkraMzVeGXM9lAgf+ww=; Message-ID: <950772.25530.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: TD35CG8VM1lCxDVC7gffxX3D9qBCdbU1mtRD1LoyhdNRGX1ipi6ezNQCIBH2QJdtdjTYPi0CXwxK1wTw3HNlJ_bed8E2gmCFyoFrPt8E0kuJT4BxTJ01CVmR6nEXcsQeslKBmj11QVQL2f0XeMPCa7HlM0e6TCkiD_HspeR9etR5PspnzbDo7NxDuiZAjla3hYMqzSGIVsSjJmaDhy0JOqKWEt0J218yglAg9zrQDtKRhFBslBJ4tFnrk0eU6lUVh6t1BvL8vL_h8LIGMrpKo8nkdC0QHp_hFhnwYbB54yahJ3ml8FlJpbciOLA.RMnJ0h69jqO2wZCb1jFm9xDvn6GQ5rNW3JS5YtIXWKxCizqLQNvI4cpPJdHi6adxtddRXEBH Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:48:39 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1358.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 References: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4af5cd780909051607j2da2c9dci899039ba1ceb56fe@mail.gmail.com> <220039.13746.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:48:39 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <220039.13746.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I actually fixed that by overriding generateActualKey in MultipleOutputFormat which I use to return null. thanks Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: himanshu chandola To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:47:58 PM Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files Thanks for the suggestion. I am using TextOutputFormat and I think that should work. But I use MultipleOutputFormat to output key,value pairs with certain key values to a file with a given name while others to a file with a different name. So if I output null for my keys after the reducer, I guess it would create problems. Any other way you could think of ? Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: Stuart White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:07:57 PM Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files Assuming you're writing plain-text output files using TextOutputFormat, which normally outputs key/value pairs delimited with a Tab, you can emit a null for your key, and neither a key nor the Tab delimiter will get written to the output file. (At least, I'm pretty sure that's right... I'm not where I can run a quick test to verify...) On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I'm a new bie to hadoop and had this question. > Normally hadoop spits output data in files in the form : > key value > > If i would like it to only write the value and not the key, what do I have > to do ? > > > > thanks a lot in advance, > > Himanshu > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > From general-return-485-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 06 19:53:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85962 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2009 19:53:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 85945 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85864 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85854 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:53:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.34] (HELO web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:53:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 48787 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Sep 2009 19:52:49 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252266769; bh=LaMooYY7fk0rBqqCbL16QrQ+ExaMSzYXoTiHzdXgei4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=re4ewXmSZABcqlFkVPYrP1IFm6Fmbe4eILg1hHjMFMoBbkBHAZSBmUwOmescB2MqzflTmcjYsP5BGzZyJjpiMjqXmsXbub3R1sZvA1oxEm03fBV+mx9vNEvwwXVoHm9LCAEbIAAzv1Xh2vK/URrryfZesv6EeysvgudbmK6WzFI= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LnXnjbibP54MvrTSWYL5eFr+zTNDmPdtjzskZiroaZxLA6awAKSe1dt2i177D6PFA/79yI/2RutTZq+XTnYJYdIBx6jMhSEjTcixJ1wrmHEeO7GbCKBnB8jJTFVky4vjSU8ZHJo/7mgj7gJGK0ruERvWmjam6HJLPCBqou6TwNo=; Message-ID: <805475.48507.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: c9k1u6YVM1k3rwIJpYMMjZyRl.3nfQi9yBLtRN9QZ0sdLPPwj9P2296fscbhKOBtNVup.0hkQ8yyiaKGa320JB3WLuFmbR1pX1NtxG28BOx8h3ZkuyI6Amc7ApXeblbW4tL2BAk0vR3coLH96mPhrELTduFXHXNDX2XBRN_UQAKFoHHufyvCRQGprOVvWPkTeZvjG2ysNckNrpNt2dOrrEwWfnlUW7cBzZYmICXF96yPafMvnY6lo33OAU3hsDvtFFLyN.FwiYqP0lV4vA0jaC0rc46gH2Ugp5twRIpQft1vkiFadS6gsM4bocImmYhGJXA29UFd8rH7KA6Uvpea4Wo9FhpUx4BhJ0LV Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:52:49 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1358.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:52:49 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: questions on map and reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, What would be the best way to get map to output values in different formats (reduce needs to add the integer ones) . I realize that writing an ObjectWritable (not of the primitive type that comes with hadoop) might be the best. I basically am worried that if I output integers to Text and convert them back to IntWritable, it would be a performance overhead. Would it be significant enough to worry about ? And can you think of anything other than ObjectWritable or having everything as Text to do this ? And another question was is there a way to get reduce to set values in JobConf or do I just flush that into disk and let the sequential job to read that. Basically , am I reading too much into the performance overhead thing ? Thanks Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-486-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 06 19:53:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86021 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2009 19:53:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 86530 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86454 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86444 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2009 19:53:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:53:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of monika.m.moser@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:53:15 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so505270fga.11 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8PZ5ZvoRxL7YOFzmuDF9u/erJuoA+9+L8Liyl1EPhPw=; b=G8Y30ThMRGNY/J3+py41y9dyfKuGUYwW0w0OKFvT0jiQbcsGWlCq1oo5IMP1HVvN6P MlyY2LPPmDAhKBpI5yWEFnXPNuDdXiVYBbHDnNQDW7PDAKU8QCI2jUnrNuwSV9Wf8IKe InCH5+mhkZyw1XlX7XjTptpDHYYsyXQAFDJ/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ohNjWQQHo56h8EkuM19HLNLvBjYzPtGYZbLAPSDUOUk+8zxIP97DxxBQ8/S/d1Yf3l OqBpX3SyOgwrjFiBG/KgYIpIreUa345pGU26FN0WnLT+cG4rz8L3HE+S4Gk3tjaQGZOq eGkS0lWBj0NCSSwgbdaJfXnRtZnY4HiCUbHoY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.210.32 with SMTP id i32mr7161845fgg.60.1252266773738; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:52:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <950772.25530.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <372864.29057.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4af5cd780909051607j2da2c9dci899039ba1ceb56fe@mail.gmail.com> <220039.13746.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <950772.25530.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 21:52:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files From: Monika Moser To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09ffb54783677b00472ee1490 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09ffb54783677b00472ee1490 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You can use the NullWritable Class in the output format in order to suppress output either for the key or for the value. Also in this case there will be no separator written. Monika 2009/9/6 himanshu chandola > I actually fixed that by overriding generateActualKey in > MultipleOutputFormat which I use to return null. > > thanks > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: himanshu chandola > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:47:58 PM > Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > I am using TextOutputFormat and I think that should work. But I use > MultipleOutputFormat to output key,value pairs with certain key values to a > file with a given name while others to a file with a different name. So if I > output null for my keys after the reducer, I guess it would create problems. > > > Any other way you could think of ? > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Stuart White > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 7:07:57 PM > Subject: Re: printing only values and not keys in hadoop output files > > Assuming you're writing plain-text output files using TextOutputFormat, > which normally outputs key/value pairs delimited with a Tab, you can emit a > null for your key, and neither a key nor the Tab delimiter will get written > to the output file. (At least, I'm pretty sure that's right... I'm not > where I can run a quick test to verify...) > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM, himanshu chandola < > himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > I'm a new bie to hadoop and had this question. > > Normally hadoop spits output data in files in the form : > > key value > > > > If i would like it to only write the value and not the key, what do I > have > > to do ? > > > > > > > > thanks a lot in advance, > > > > Himanshu > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > > Neo: No. > > Morpheus: Why Not? > > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --00c09ffb54783677b00472ee1490-- From general-return-487-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 06 23:05:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19776 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2009 23:05:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2009 23:05:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 90555 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 23:05:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90469 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2009 23:05:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90437 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2009 23:05:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:05:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=ASF_LIST_OPS,HEAD_LONG,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of digvijaysinghshaktawat@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.202] (HELO mail-pz0-f202.google.com) (209.85.222.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:05:35 +0000 Received: by pzk40 with SMTP id 40so604782pzk.30 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:05:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kmh4qIw+gv9BRLTmDebrM5f82TRIbbPxNLsRlkQlhHA=; b=EioHjwYJBasFShe00FdHrW7f3yVSE70Ziw99fVqlkNMLVOpgR02BWI5vjMT04lc6Ms VY8aAwBmsmP+tRKB0ZQ1xJknKIhqRua4Wdc3eBvvulbI9wsLfsb2aYJgxGkfk7KZimDg ckYuhAnn04zYKY/8LrWqdJaR6RuyXtsQrVMIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=N6V78ui1TlNrKsqbVmpdx7JsUO7KuEPx2maKnGIUTHv7P4OzEwltOKjnUCsV8e+b3z 5oNIwek6QTuusqeg47g3ffaDlWDpmJAjcb8eflIMGMS62RCn7yzIcavds+MzZaXuNx8o WLvxjdzfG/5+nAKK185hQvr66YdLDUC+3c1+s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.8.12 with SMTP id 12mr457826wfh.70.1252276316327; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:31:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8e0e69ea0909061502x6df82175y91f642dd8882e895@mail.gmail.com> References: <8e0e69ea0909061502x6df82175y91f642dd8882e895@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:01:56 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: MUST READ - we can all use a little luck in our lives... From: digvijay singh shaktawat To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?rUFycGl0IEpvc2hpIH4uLi4uLml0cyBhIG5ldyBzdGFydA==?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=ADRishitosh_=AD_Bhatia?= , =?UTF-8?B?J+KAoCBBZlRlUmdsT3cg4oCgJyAn?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBM=DFR=AB_=D8PTIMIST_kunal_sanghvi?= , "@bH!$HEk Vy@$" , "//eht@ ." , "/0te fr t/j... www.new7wonders.com" , "<<>> Can't Get U Out Of My Head.." , =?UTF-8?B?4pa6IMOFz4DOmM6Yz4Hil4QtIC3CpC0tXl0gQCBIb21lIFteLS3CpC0gLQ==?= , =?UTF-8?B?4piF4peP4pWg4pWjxJA54oSi4pS84oSi4peP4pSM4oip4pSQKOKXo+KXoiDilojilZHkuYLQs86YY2s=?= =?UTF-8?B?xaHPhM6x4pWR4paIKOKXoyDil6IpR+C4hOCusEfguKPRgsSD?= , =?UTF-8?B?4pmlIOC4hOC5ktGS4LmA4Lij0ZLRlNC6IOKZpQ==?= , =?UTF-8?B?4pmlUmFodWzimaUgamFpbuKZpeKZpQ==?= , "Ab Pappu saala nachega..." , Abhijay Sisodia , abhijay sisodia , Abhishek Gupta , "ABHISHEK... I PLAY TO WIN!!!" , ADITYA PAREEK , "ADITYA...... PAREEK DIU ROXXXXXXX!!!!" , afhaam qureshi , "Akash...I M LOST IN ORKUT" , akshat oswal , akshat oswal , algorythmus2008@gmail.com, "analprakhar\"best of THE BEAST\"........." , "anchit (bhanu).......back from home" , "anchit(bhanu) ...........tech time" , Anil Kishore , "ANKIT ##K^^OW ME```## K^^OW =@LIFE" , "Ankit anubhav $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" , "Ankit....... @VIT" , "ankur .......missing home" , ankur mittal , "ankur mittal bvp I.T ki jai ho!!" , =?windows-1252?B?QW5rdXIgmSAuLi4uLi4=?= , "aNshuL ....\" in crow'th dimension\"" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5zaHVsIMKrz4ZlYWNlZnVswqvPiWFycmnimLxywqs=?= , anshulika singh , Anurag Garg , Anurag Garg , "arjun Singhal...vote for taj" , Arpit maru , ARPIT-A DAY DREAMMER , Arti Krishnawat , Ashish Aeran , Atishay , "avi.... New Hair Style..." , "avi....new no. 9993794257" , "AVINASH.. 9723895020!!!" , Ayush Modi , "ayush modi..." , "Being AbHimaNyu ...ThinKi|| DifferentlY..." , bharath@vmukti.com, bhumika.planet@gmail.com, "check my album.. web-site updated" , chitbhav bhatjiwale , "chitbhav<>" , common-user@hadoop.apache.org, Dhaval Sanghvi , digvijay singh shaktawat , digvijay.shaktawat@gmail.com, Divyendra Chauhan , dorav kumar , Ehtesham Hazarika , Ehtesham Hazarika , "Every thin U can imagine is REAL!!!...." , fren list full join on s rajora2 , Gaurav Singh , general-sc.1250981800.ndbmfpfinodhoijpmloj-digvijaysinghshaktawat=gmail.com@hadoop.apache.org, general-subscribe@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, Himanshu gupta , himanshu gupta , "hnkuprai.. m so messd up rite nw.!" , "I hate HOLIDAYS.........." , "Ishan - Rare Orkutting 4m now on ...." , "Jackson Life is ful of fun!!!!!!!!!!" , "jigyasa.. njoin at home...." , "kamakhya ..lifes so cul wid CrIcKeT.." , kamakhya pratap , kartik kudada , lebinitiz , "M@dDy~~If U W@Nt SoMe~~ CoMe GeT SoMe" , "Marlo Group .... Ankit Agarwal" , "miles to go..tnt the king of agraba......." , "mohit @ 9608339390" , mohit agarwal , mohit mittal , "moving towards the correct side ....." , "Nakul raavviiing visit www.iitr.ac.in/rave" , Naman Patni , navneet singh , Neha Garg , "No orkuting till 3 dec......................." , "pankhuri.. ." , "parth patel (satyameva jayate)" , Pawan garg , pawan garg , pk girpade , PRABHAT PRATAP RAO , PRABHAT RAO , Prateek Agarwal , "praveen it$ begining of new er@" , "Praveen..... GOOD ol' days are over..." , PrAvIr JhA , "puneet... ALIGATOR BREAKS FREE" , Rahul Ladhania , Rahul Sharma , rahulsharma.bitsg@gmail.com, Rajeev Gupta , rakesh kumar , "Rakesh More........." , ravi agrawal , "Rishika ~ in Bbay now...!!! missin Pune.." , "Rohan - \"BUTRU\" -..........In GOA..........." , rohan --- hoping fr brighter sunshine in life , "Rohit09376910288 ..!!" , romit pandey , romit PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN , saleema omar , sameer khan , "sameer khan ** sacred 4 all times++" , Sarah Lal , Saurabh Arora , SEEMANT GUPTA , shivraj singh rathore , "Shrenik:-TrUsT A PoIsEn snake BuT NeVr GIrL" , shweta.svnit@gmail.com, shweta@vmukti.com, "SIDDHARTH:- HAPPY AND NJOYING" , Siddhartha Lal , Sky Dots Systems , somya garg , "Sonali ..." , sopan.shewale@gmail.com, "Sourabh...raped in this sem" , suman_dongre , sumanmdongre@gmail.com, "SUMIT.......... ." , support@salesforce.com, suresh remember moments not days , "swasti ." , sweta@vmukti.com, TANMAY D Party Starter , Taru Sardana , Tejas der Bonbon , The Darker side of LIGHT , Trusha Dave , urmi patel , urmi patel , "vaibhav jindal ." , Vanshvardhan Singh Hada , "varun : mob. no. changed" , varun gupta , Vasistha Chowdhary , "Vibhor Tulsyan on -**---TOUR---**-" , "vijit....HurRaY :D ItS TimE 2 ----->HOme" , Vikas Gupta , "Vikas..... HP 7 too gud" , "www.moodi.org -mauly" , =?UTF-8?B?0YLQvdGUINC90ZTOsdGP0YIg0L3OsdGVIM6xINC8zrnQuOKIgiDPg2YgzrnRgtGVIM+Dz4nQuCDOsQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?4bmJw7jDuM+B?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502be98fed6ad0472f04c4b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502be98fed6ad0472f04c4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sameer Khan Date: Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:32 AM Subject: MUST READ - we can all use a little luck in our lives... To: "desparate 2 make .....undeterred progress...." < lovin_johnny@hotmail.com> Good advice! Believe! *This is without a doubt one of the nicest good luck forwards I have received. Hope it works for you -- and me! * *Lotus Touts: You have 6 minutes* *There's some mighty fine advice in these words, even if you're not superstitious. This Lotus Touts has been sent to you for good luck from the Anthony Robbins organization. It has been sent around the world ten times so far. * *Do not keep this message..* *The Lotus Touts must leave your hands in 6 MINUTES. Otherwise you will get a very unpleasant surprise. This is true, even if you are not superstitious, agnostic, or otherwise faith impaired. * *ONE. Give people more than they expect and do it cheerfully.* *TWO. Marry a man/woman you love to talk to. As you get older, their conversational skills will be as important as any other. * *THREE. Don't believe all you hear, spend all you have or sleep all you want. * *FOUR.. When you say, 'I love you,' mean it.** * *FIVE. When you say, 'I'm sorry,' look the person in the eye. * *SIX. Be engaged at least six months before you get married. * *SEVEN. **Believe in love at first sight.** * *EIGHT. Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. * *NINE. Love deeply and passionately. You might get hurt but it's the only way to live life completely. * *TEN.. In disagreements, fight fairly. No name calling. * *ELEVEN.** **Don't judge people by their relatives.** * *TWELVE. Talk slowly but think quickly. * *THIRTEEN! .. When someone asks you a question you don't want to answer, smile and ask, 'Why do you want to know?' * *FOURTEEN. Remember that great love and great achievements involve great risk. * *FIFTEEN. Say 'bless you' when you hear someone sneeze. * *SIXTEEN. When you lose, don't lose the lesson.* *SEVENTEEN. **Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; and Responsibility for all your actions. * *EIGHTEEN. Don't let a little dispute injure a great friendship. * *NINETEEN. When you realize you've made a mistake, take immediate steps to correct it.** * *TWENTY. Smile when picking up the phone. The caller will hear it in your voice * *TWENTY- ONE.. Spend some time alone. * *Now, here's the FUN part! * *Send this to at least 5 people and your life will improve. * * * *1-4 people: Your life will improve slightly. * * * *5-9 people: Your life will improve to your liking.* * * *9-14 people: You will have at least 5 surprises in the next 3 weeks * *15 and above: Your life will improve drastically and everything you ever dreamed of will begin to take shape. * *A true friend is someone who reaches for your hand and touches your heart.* * Do not keep this message.* ------------------------------ -- Sameer khan's BLOG - http://sameerkhansblog.blogspot.com/ Follow @ Twitter - http://twitter.com/Sameer_Khan Facebook Page - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sameer-Khans-BLOG/73173892290 Friend Feed - http://friendfeed.com/spectrojin --00504502be98fed6ad0472f04c4b-- From general-return-488-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 07 09:48:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63357 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 09:48:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 09:48:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 56578 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 09:48:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56497 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 09:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56487 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2009 09:48:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:48:35 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so173000iwn.2 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vD7T+pNUCt8z1nBc1wrjATE9EeBcSRJq3LBwa7up4Nw=; b=pMrybZLbPHmHklh0+qRpVNpk+HmeyjS/nl8NelIpLTpLfcV0um2hT+adLPLWHi4iiS POWc977oOxSPhS9xRhCiJ/hdN5hEfhoOf50k85yEp5uzBvhRT0oiV2i+Y+I5/7zqqSBe E7BgA1An2gV0VvLPDCakST/zyXfBEQ2jtXpG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=B95uQ6FMEafTy1kwYQG5lx2LKFexpor0OJjn1CN78fE9nrXxdxpe6cOp7n0YAD4GAI A+kXB+FccHllTRf/S9+dQJFCkHE830uWcTv3LVoKwjgVnQVTOVl4yuu33inO9lMEBtJd qPqjHXPRlXX0f3xRO++LTIlrKQI/k6URDeRHI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.6.164 with SMTP id 36mr11348380ibz.39.1252316893569; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 02:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:48:13 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Type mismatch in value from map: expected org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.IntWritable From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce0689663980472f9bf46 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175ce0689663980472f9bf46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I get this error on WordCount program, originally copied from the examples folder in Hadoop-0.19.2. I dont understand why I get this error. Everything is set right. Please see the code and give feedback. import java.io.IOException; import java.util.*; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; import org.apache.hadoop.conf.*; import org.apache.hadoop.io.*; import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.*; import org.apache.hadoop.util.*; public class WordCount { public static class Map extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { private Text word = new Text(); private Text upperWord = new Text(); public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { String line = value.toString(); StringTokenizer tokenizer = new StringTokenizer(line); while (tokenizer.hasMoreTokens()) { String temp =tokenizer.nextToken(); word.set(temp); upperWord.set(temp.toUpperCase()); output.collect(word, upperWord); } } } public static class Reduce extends MapReduceBase implements Reducer { public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { String sum = new String(); boolean flag=true; while (values.hasNext()) { if(!flag) sum = sum.concat(", "+values.next().toString()); else sum = values.next().toString(); flag=false; } output.collect(key, new Text(sum)); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { JobConf conf = new JobConf(WordCount.class); conf.setJobName("wordcount"); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); conf.setMapOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setMapOutputValueClass(Text.class); conf.setMapperClass(Map.class); //conf.setCombinerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setReducerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path("In")); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path("Outer")); JobClient.runJob(conf); } } Thanks H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --0015175ce0689663980472f9bf46-- From general-return-489-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 07 10:41:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76092 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 10:41:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 10:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18607 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 10:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18468 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 10:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18440 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2009 10:41:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:41:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:40:52 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so179010iwn.2 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FlQO013bEp/UozZbSk3ESR5cEMRyY6BvXtMxHVcEaNA=; b=Pyour4WbNS7lwDmI1SqNU5UBHUoEN7LoXy4bkmGoBRYqf0iMZguTZDMTV0Nfls4JZk TAChETgqVZ5cEDD4gdU8l+/SAoyB+KehGORCZy3W1kK9hn508OZCrtd7YVF7o4QBy2ig K6fRAKxYR0IiB1eXuRE6yLWyVGWbbghsnF7hc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=uzZcKPPs/WH28Ng5snLQ38plzzHrBngGAp5XocQdfNGwfJuUFu2XhZqZBrrYL46rtf DTsAfFuYTCrF+9KYJIqyBZGnhYVnszOsOUpWxyUkCZPoLRBBC2rSsZWkST33vYGN2x62 zKb9Dey+iLxCc6A/nh4G8MAF86xQcoQv2tTfA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.26.78 with SMTP id d14mr11342557ibc.30.1252320031750; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:40:29 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Please interpret the output -please help - going mad From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517740c1aa34a710472fa7a44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517740c1aa34a710472fa7a44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi I am going mad, pulling my hairs now, past 2 days, trying to figure out the output by this map-reduce program. Please help or you can find me in asylum. in the map function below, output.collect(Text,Duo) - Duo is a custom input format, map functions trasnfers "hello, duo("hello,hello")" key-value pair to the reducer. The reducer ouptuts "" as the key-value pair, however, the output is actually different. The input file is I love you you love me we love eachother The output is I I love you we we love eachother you you love me Please make me understand, why the output is not . --------------------------- Here is the code public class SplitFile { public static class Map extends MapReduceBase implements Mapper { public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { String property=new String(); String object = new String(); String line = value.toString(); StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(line); Text subject = new Text(st.nextToken()); property = st.nextToken(); object = st.nextToken(); Duo d = new Duo(property,object); output.collect(new Text("hello"),new Duo("hello","hello")); } } public static class Reduce extends MapReduceBase implements Reducer { public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { /* String finalString=null; System.out.println("key"+key); Duo d = new Duo(); while (values.hasNext()) { d = values.next(); System.out.println("duo object received is = "+d.toString()); finalString = d.getProperty()+ " " + d.getObject(); //System.out.println("final String ="+finalString); }*/ output.collect(new Text("hello"), new IntWritable(2)); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { JobConf conf = new JobConf(SplitFile.class); conf.setJobName("SplitFile"); conf.setMapOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setMapOutputValueClass(Duo.class); conf.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); conf.setOutputValueClass(IntWritable.class); conf.setMapperClass(Map.class); //conf.setCombinerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setReducerClass(Reduce.class); conf.setInputFormat(TextInputFormat.class); conf.setOutputFormat(TextOutputFormat.class); FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(conf, new Path("In")); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(conf, new Path("Out")); //System.out.println("2"); JobClient.runJob(conf); } } Thanks and Regards H. Kumar --001517740c1aa34a710472fa7a44-- From general-return-490-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 08 20:30:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80403 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2009 20:30:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2009 20:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 62866 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2009 20:30:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62807 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2009 20:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62797 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2009 20:30:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:30:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:30:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 80193 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2009 20:30:14 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:30:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA6BED4.9050007@apache.org> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:30:12 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 1)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI, I have started a new release vote on avro-dev. If you have time, please evaluate the candidate and vote there. Thanks, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 1) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:28:23 -0700 From: Doug Cutting To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a second candidate build for Avro release 1.1.0. This fixes AVRO-112. Please download, test and vote by 11 September. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.1.0-candidate-1/ Thanks! Doug From general-return-491-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 09 00:09:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16010 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 00:09:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 00:09:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 45687 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 00:09:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45551 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 00:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45459 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 00:09:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:09:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.171] (HELO mail-qy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.221.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:09:10 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so2973882qyk.22 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IZdTJuFHN8E9bH3bf+p67dw0/og8Xu6AqXZx/5oxExg=; b=APpeRqDfCtN9TUYupwqvIYHsj7ThFY3hKCVvA7yotlcek2ce3/wiE1qhxpxiP2blj3 fZbf1kib5jwLTlvajJVsreU4XFvzMKFPWiDoiBv3x3hxINjLI38K4E3RsIOhW0mUX4U5 uXSh8RxFaVNDZqUnHgk6+um4qsEMnZ2oG/brg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=diir3tC5NBHdpZ4BvgCSrEm4soCmr+4YHfhZO0vMi2b083oEA6VWR0SIJNsEgNUYz4 cQ8LWENaNO1mvMlJIPAPBWfLAAMutHkD2XDInet/o9KnZr1FARpbiSjNydt6yxErYUSY hMYgpFxRUIUWZMsGedbFmEVPFYJ1tRSWl93Kc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.1.65 with SMTP id 1mr4399812qce.20.1252454926276; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:08:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 52c4c7969d7363e3 Message-ID: <7c962aed0909081708u530477c8m44f223ed04d9df83@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [ANN] HBase 0.20.0 available for download From: stack To: HBase Dev List , hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646c98afa58b4047319e2a1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163646c98afa58b4047319e2a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HBase 0.20.0 is available for download: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/releases.html The Release Notes are available here: http://su.pr/2sjrkf This HBase is faster, slimmer, sweeter smelling, and more robust than previous versions. We recommend that all upgrade to this release. HBase 0.20.0 runs on Hadoop 0.20.0. A lot has changed since 0.19.x including configuration fundamentals. Be sure to read the 'Getting Started' documentation: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/r0.20.0/api/overview-summary.html#overview_description If you wish to bring your 0.19.x hbase data forward to 0.20.0, you will need to run a migration. See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToMigrate. First read the overview and then go to the section, 'From 0.19.x to 0.20.x'. Thanks to all who contributed to this release Yours, The HBasistas P.S. 0.20.0 Highlights include: + Much improved performance + Master is no longer SPOF + Rolling restarts -- no need to take down whole cluster updating config. or making minor upgrades + A new, more comprehensive API (The old API is still present but deprecated) + Improved mapreduce connectors updated to suit Hadoop 0.20.0 new mapreduce API + New contrib package with updated Transactional HBase (THBase) and Indexed HBase (ITHBase) as well as a new REST gateway called stargate + And, as they say on the radio, "much, much more". --00163646c98afa58b4047319e2a1-- From general-return-492-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 09 17:15:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18864 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 17:15:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 17:15:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 79697 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 17:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79598 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 17:15:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79588 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 17:15:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:15:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.37] (HELO web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:15:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 99889 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Sep 2009 17:15:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252516502; bh=bbvl3oXfTwIRJStYCXWxKPCuaxZUyj2ANM5MQmRbZ50=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XxYZ+L5mxWmtt5VACfR/QBkZUJ26g9LKGlQa15+55XTUR5rvQNn50yj9WdYMcRW724tLhsaYozwBMNjBdCLbcuVJ+tcZEPZsjP2rJlYo5u2t4en8wN0RnyRMmfshMk5IVW26U/SOrFK+pZBXi6b3wJtLrFJFxbk7bSjnHYQWLxE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O/Mhvqmb+B+Rx0cd5siV6Ejuae3c+kwFtQDIMWNT1amuKHpkw/rW07hs2wEd637DhaHKQe+XubZNq3CK0kJFW+W0dQkcuzCCBHv7qBNjaBJu6WL3EmjjNMDYL/cggQlPFV1tmyEnD5GKIyiL+abQSWlRpRcTYTAOJ1myEOnUPDU=; Message-ID: <14015.97592.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: G39EPv8VM1ldhcyUqRXXoUaiwCYGaDmsDJ0HDNqKnh4_jkgHCV9CECfVCg5M.0z3GWVEty0..1H6zFjXtXayNoZGI3fNR.CCEelUR6AZGleEccEjCk.u66loDUHqeMt4hV0qyCxvc_6IDZobKOpFVpeg5kdJw_AzdBJYTuzvd0CJxeD1UphmCDOF0nSHrBXHuhxrmRq8RnD7SSQOKx2cR6p8G0uqNPHnMGZNa.R0cYLt783nWZ9tiJEId8wiuoRfjSL7yJOHt2u59tfCQmkKpeX1x3armPeBG6NgAZYk1Q3D.5fP1urMpTv_9kgn3Pa5JzUgzl1CskjYR_F8Zd20dd6khbmKt2r7AMVsylk- Received: from [129.170.212.235] by web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:15:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.15 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:15:01 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: multicore node clusters To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I've a cluster where every node is a multicore. From doing internet searches I've figured out that I definitely need to change mapred.tasktracker.tasks.maximum according to the number of clusters. But there are definitely other things that I would like to change for example mapred.map.tasks. Can someone point me out the list of things I should change to get the best performance out of my cluster ? thanks Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-493-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 09 23:24:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27242 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 23:24:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2009 23:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 71702 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 23:24:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71628 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2009 23:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71618 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2009 23:24:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:24:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:24:39 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n89NOBwx015056 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:24:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id n89NOA85015055 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:24:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Perceus and Hadoop Date: 09 Sep 2009 19:24:10 -0400 X-Mailer: Prayer v1.0.16 X-Originating-IP: [192.12.184.2] Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=6.0 tests=FH_RELAY_NODNS,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Has anyone experimented with using the perceus provisioning system and hadoop? I am presently trying to get the hadoop cluster up with this system and I am getting really weird results. sometimes the dfs will start properly and then other times it will not, and I never change the config files. all of the hadoop components are running stateless, and the dfs is pointed to the two local disks on each node. I don't believe it is my config files, because when I do manage to get the dfs up, it works appropriately, from being able to store files to it and all of the dfsadmin commands. any ideas? thanks much all -- -- Grant Mackey PhD student Computer Engineering University of Central Florida From general-return-494-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 10 02:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85999 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 02:37:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 02:37:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 66339 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 02:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66246 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 02:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66236 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2009 02:37:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:37:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthew.kelcey@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.27] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:37:20 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so1274775eye.23 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:36:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kaNh4hicnq3WtrYQdauhfmj+E1bM1V5n+WW051UK1DQ=; b=Ogw8lUkiry6brRJHyz2ga21N58A5DnNEbRYQ686NGqTTlesbDdG55i5f0V8a/mIRB9 d4HwAOVUzRA3eHYyzfsQGsjBmOcLwtTjng4ARq5ybyRXa5epVY0KC61N3lcHbVf5/O35 ltslzrRZoe+jzfqYseKeicHTB63zUbld2B00U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QpZwhkKRpXIlpZkRm8JkL6FTuLzqJyGjRLkH9r3SW036j4rhSIokTjt9lS0ttrTMJY FMCxxfiMqbWPD3wY0TCw5EPUhctarqeDby8IxivmrJuugZGHq5q+Uv4YKpr5NcwcDN2B l2jmhmjh+37eK67GDIPZedQsTkzzyIRZYgaEc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.129.20 with SMTP id g20mr301842ebn.14.1252550218761; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:36:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14015.97592.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <14015.97592.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:36:58 +1000 Message-ID: <93d501de0909091936r5e234e69k80f849fb6a5ed345@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: multicore node clusters From: Mat Kelcey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I've a cluster where every node is a multicore. From doing internet searc= hes I've figured out that I definitely need to change mapred.tasktracker.ta= sks.maximum according to the number of clusters. But there are definitely o= ther things that I would like to change for example mapred.map.tasks. Can s= omeone point me out the list of things I should change to get the best perf= ormance out of my cluster ? nothing will give you better results than benchmarking with some jobs indicative to your domain! From general-return-495-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 10 13:32:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72741 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 13:32:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 13:32:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 71315 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 13:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71245 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2009 13:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71230 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2009 13:32:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:32:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.183] (HELO mail-px0-f183.google.com) (209.85.216.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:31:51 +0000 Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so91420pxi.13 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:31:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WTPDTWWZp7Na9Sc+F6oBBAavPv7ukKNP5mhJzkTBkAE=; b=Q6ueKA291/XdxN8Nmv+RWkeVeeOBKpvyDdQreS7QoK5GjyOQEMyYPVYz5pZziAZrVo ys02E5psxCBE4/+sPAQh5KGvTXLB0kwUtu29GV/aJd5dPHwvVXZ8OyHQ9SW0BN/3mVb+ PPV5pyehl1l9lxdrcrb1fkAXZDat/VMHLAr7Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Ua8r+zESnEkh7tTFY6GT2JZ6IzD/OxD7KECTf6B6OWGnbeT6rUTOQL+vgmp2PJVbL5 TZJbzViB3Y/I73HdHCkReefT1icZU0gksQm/CR5++BWvJJOZZbg9Vs6+CJ3P3Hf4p+wt 8x3euCUBKNsML/oM2yIsrn8O/LDdU0e2ESH24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.149.4 with SMTP id b4mr2929946wao.18.1252589489698; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:31:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <93d501de0909091936r5e234e69k80f849fb6a5ed345@mail.gmail.com> References: <14015.97592.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <93d501de0909091936r5e234e69k80f849fb6a5ed345@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:01:29 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df20909100631g5b6b52eeh90a3af5d3b9549ef@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: multicore node clusters From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646a49a953a250473393790 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646a49a953a250473393790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, You should definitely change mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum. If your tasks are more CPU bound then you should run the tasks equal to the number of CPU cores otherwise you can run more tasks than cores. You can determine CPU and memory usage by running "top" command on datanodes. You should also take care of following configuration parameters to achieve best performance *mapred.compress.map.output:* Faster data transfer (from mapper to reducers), saves disk space, faster disk writing. Extra time in compression and decompression *io.sort.mb: *If you have idle physical memory after running all tasks you can increase this value. But swap space should not be used since it makes it slow.* **io.sort.factor: *If your map tasks have large number of spills* *then you should increase this value.It also helps in merging at reducers. *mapred.job.reuse.jvm.num.tasks: *The overhead of JVM creation for each task is around 1 second. So for the tasks which live for seconds or a few minutes and have lengthy initialization, this value can be increased to gain performance. *mapred.reduce.parallel.copies: *For Large jobs (the jobs in which map output is very large), value of this property can be increased keeping in mind that it will increase the total CPU usage.* **mapred.map/reduce.tasks.speculative.execution: *set to false to gain high throughput. *dfs.block.size* or *mapred.min.split.size* or *mapred.max.split.size* : to control the number of maps On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Mat Kelcey wrote: > > I've a cluster where every node is a multicore. From doing internet > searches I've figured out that I definitely need to change > mapred.tasktracker.tasks.maximum according to the number of clusters. But > there are definitely other things that I would like to change for example > mapred.map.tasks. Can someone point me out the list of things I should > change to get the best performance out of my cluster ? > > nothing will give you better results than benchmarking with some jobs > indicative to your domain! > -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, --0016e646a49a953a250473393790-- From general-return-496-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 11 16:26:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11677 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2009 16:26:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2009 16:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 50562 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 16:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49893 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 16:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49718 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2009 16:26:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:26:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:26:12 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n8BGP64T099316; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=CrpfHne5u0w6clG27M6Qp8bfnrko9UG93nT7tbuAfQf+NaSf/KDVkW3iYBKERxB4 Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:06 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:25:05 -0700 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Sep 23rd at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Sep 23rd at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLggyrkMg Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD3462851@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I'd like to remind everyone that RSVP is open for the next monthly Bay Area= Hadoop user group organized by Yahoo!. Agenda and registration available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11166700/ Looking forward to seeing you at September 23rd. Dekel From general-return-497-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 11 17:34:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38524 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2009 17:34:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2009 17:34:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 81758 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 17:34:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81684 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 17:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81674 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2009 17:34:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:34:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:34:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 38357 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2009 17:34:26 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:34:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4AAA8A21.7040202@apache.org> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:34:25 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 1)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI, I have started a new release vote on avro-dev. If you have time, please evaluate the candidate and vote there. Thanks, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.1.0 (candidate 1) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:31:55 -0700 From: Doug Cutting To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a third candidate build for Avro release 1.1.0. This fixes AVRO-114. Please download, test and vote by 15 September. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.1.0-candidate-2/ Thanks! Doug From general-return-498-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 11 21:41:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34150 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 37124 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37039 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2009 21:41:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37029 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2009 21:41:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:41:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:41:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 33644 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2009 21:41:24 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:41:24 +0000 Message-ID: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:41:23 -0700 From: Doug Cutting Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: HTTP transport? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm considering an HTTP-based transport for Avro as the preferred, high-performance option. HTTP has lots of advantages. In particular, it already has - lots of authentication, authorization and encryption support; - highly optimized servers; - monitoring, logging, etc. Tomcat and other servlet containers support async NIO, where a thread is not required per connection. A servlet can process bulk data with a single copy to and from the socket (bypassing stream buffers). Calls can be multiplexed over a single HTTP connection using Comet events. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/aio.html Zero copy is not an option for servlets that generate arbitrary data, but one can specify a file/start/length tuple and Tomcat will use sendfile to write the response. That means that while HDFS datanode file reads could not be done via RPC, they could be done via HTTP with zero-copy. If authentication and authorization are already done in the HTTP server, this may not be a big loss. The HDFS client might make two HTTP requests, one to read a files data, and another to read its checksums. The server would then stream the entire block to the client using sendfile, using TCP flow control as today. Thoughts? Doug From general-return-499-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 03:49:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24640 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 03:49:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 03:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 97570 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 03:48:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97421 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 03:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97411 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 03:48:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:48:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.32] (HELO web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:48:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 72400 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Sep 2009 03:48:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252727305; bh=y2IB/blseocl/BTpwByicTPpR0oOcoFndk/eS7L8qfI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HlvCOHmfMnYsYUJTjsyDtzm7pKi6Ms8CQEw6vQ0E+nU7C1266iTHmBQmo/dLAWKmbvFJP7SiTwYEm/uzRolaE2/CSa8sbUBInuHN4EnIRPwt2BkommcHPEFVjuRO8nmVI7KA9MXyXfVzv0SsiRNRDiF0pU7mxlFQKOY1/hFfqXs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MQeJpqXPu2n7xuw6ekpRwKRGRSBjOm1h4EUqPC0lwpw5qWlTJSfsJlZtHgxjYvAutTyp3AEth9a4Jt3/izVEFeul39D5/xHiXuN1lf4e+0h02vVonrfmhtz4nvugcJbJAhafip5HSkefYEAJZJteoiF8eTGi7QbJzdQYAKCT/I4=; Message-ID: <699968.68276.qm@web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: VSNAUmIVM1maBMB70H9VQPicGHLLqo3TnBIAd6NL2r7ADCw3diJnj_c3qIjXAXyP4mk04J8Lzp7Qi33pQUgOsWyk0AdhiB1NY4PAJpxNVaRIqe44pzYLJ6jmWZZS0YH9GN2ugsYBDR1vaJG0qJBnYK_VaLG66eNMgSByWKTPhqoGd0nZvmsoia_hrjBKZDDq8psx1p678XtuzyzFb30veAeuNCbU8wX3wf6B_Zb3NGr.kX3xcaVlaX_chFWlR7MGxqhyk5nUwHFlTJgut1PvbEpGDwMntb5Xp54byBa92fs28jc- Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:48:25 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:48:25 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: changing map and reduce model To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ppl, What would Ive to do to make the following model work for the word count application: The input is a text file . What I would like to do is that every map task gets a list of lines equal to number of lines/ number of map tasks allowed. I think its better for the performance of the app, that a map task get a list of records rather than just one record ., so that you save time on starting jvm and the functional overheads. It seems to me that given that we Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-500-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 05:02:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36379 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 05:02:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 05:02:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 35644 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 05:02:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35554 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 05:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35544 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 05:02:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:02:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.37] (HELO web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:02:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 59071 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Sep 2009 05:01:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252731703; bh=yILGDXczNQyOE7b2K9T9EwbnkI3RJ6wK1VowupsFHcQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a9EyPphafd6PKKlYUX44pOmSoChKS/sOt1kzm3evmPoEuGEJoZkWOMATS98KSXgyVdwJpR3T6kzX85StMEDZ0REAXp6LXLNKrt+4txWhgTxTQQiwaR/7vP4xfIdv0XTYFtX8oJ1Upv7cdI5vQJn7F+cnkDC7S+qJMi5/SLCZl0k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ze1Yb54746gJTKnzUN9RoKVOCIlSGtD8iX2OQFCjO+5cNwwxnDcLwvPl3xHsvxrtkmHRSEqHCzCdzXtdN1DC9jw9ZS1ZlhCBsSCwveDsTyX2pXeDp4C/ZmAibD8R8rWKEMovBjo2cvnpNBf2Bd+4iSMp7R+lEFjK746gxPs/X/g=; Message-ID: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: IrgAUE8VM1nnZH9OdNP1f.7QJa3o7.nla9MJ3C0qXQ9p7fCh2qP44bcJw6sjVMbryzkuWiYZajDLzeMAbqtJC7y7R.mE8AmaTmXgCfrFwoCkQIHoBx30VDw6RUaDPQAjVXW.UNLzWeNqNVJT9bXYhhLWaspzQe.n.yk3fl6zxPjMb8LhJWyzctTXXVKGYzdp8bsfe0puqs3Wi6r07VRAlWFpOpJM16Kb3XZhW5m3PIKDUtJ65SZvz_dYGDYkqAt3EbMChIlcsbZlGjtVZaZ2GxHKYfiG53UIbCg8NP6yQW4ELHb7ILHA8.EDYc_zXeJW3LQSlAGVmAGAWpxFggU6BQTTmncihvWcaGP_ Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:01:42 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:01:42 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: nodes lying idle To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi everyone, Ive a cluster of 40 nodes. The input file has 2^18 lines and every line is an input to a map job. Every node is a quad core and hence I've set mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum to a value greater than 4. The first 20 nodes are showing hadoop jobs taking 100% but with only one process running while since its a quad core I would've liked to see 4 java processes taking 100% (there are 5 java processes on this system but 4 are idle and only one is taking 100% or 1 cpu). For the last half of the nodes, the cpu usage of hadoop processes is 0. This is really strange since my map tasks are processing in a very slow way and I wouldve liked to use all nodes and all the cores. What could possibly be wrong ? It would really help if anyone could suggest . thanks H Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-501-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 05:50:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43153 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 05:50:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 05:50:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 56322 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 05:50:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56232 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 05:50:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56221 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 05:50:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:50:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:50:04 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1404555pxi.20 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:49:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TzSgSukWm4ThPOdWuqFOeF4yztmSVJVQBjNWUZkV7O0=; b=xfzOWNxKvtFaxnU1b0Wx9MzNKKsFJx9x4HVSQmxnyb6aoXRJNGXM3wQFQavKZrYoX4 BmrG4SDMJmqNKS5xXCcMXMIzIfTZz4qh5ZXiCol+/CEYTk6bzW8LpNvdb8Cn0nNPex62 YgaI1MXbJzQj3tWtLBfvLPRpul7rMTqvG7G4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wmn49+9Js4xTGgjWBHO8Si3dgwEwx8L27Pca0l/4pWx58FWiIzubYCrRsT2eomOYn4 wBHKs1FQJUiPUrUvcbXkohBs9+gr1vl4FIl0IU8tnwv+E078pjrEnA9Kd07MZJQIXeiG f+0ZlL+odtwXWq6J8MUrGFGjODbADyd2TUxJs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.116.12 with SMTP id o12mr6975576wac.83.1252734581975; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:49:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:19:41 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df20909112249l1aa9a5cdifa91ebbfd6e3a7e6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: nodes lying idle From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b14b3bc1ab4004735aff2e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636b14b3bc1ab4004735aff2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You need to check your cluster's Map/Reduce task capacity. i.e. how many Map/Reduce task can run on cluster at once. You can check it on http://JobtrackerServerIP:50030. You should also check total number of map tasks in your job. It should be greater than map task capacity of the cluster. Intially reduce tasks will be idle till first batch of map task complete. -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Ive a cluster of 40 nodes. The input file has 2^18 lines and every line is > an input to a map job. Every node is a quad core and hence I've set > mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum to a value greater than 4. The > first 20 nodes are showing hadoop jobs taking 100% but with only one process > running while since its a quad core I would've liked to see 4 java processes > taking 100% (there are 5 java processes on this system but 4 are idle and > only one is taking 100% or 1 cpu). For the last half of the nodes, the cpu > usage of hadoop processes is 0. This is really strange since my map tasks > are processing in a very slow way and I wouldve liked to use all nodes and > all the cores. > > What could possibly be wrong ? It would really help if anyone could suggest > . > > thanks > > H > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > --001636b14b3bc1ab4004735aff2e-- From general-return-502-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 06:55:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94644 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 06:55:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 06:55:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 76168 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 06:55:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76099 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 06:55:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76089 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 06:55:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:55:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.39] (HELO web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:55:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 50117 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Sep 2009 06:55:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252738516; bh=Ik9BBY8fVnB5BAjG3aq5rjP4G0mxyscER42ZasQ3ZUI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1524owITrXlcPbEz/YYbI0Pf1OskCj4x1368RilNFbXaQ1Wf89ks9g9Cd3oB1H3QD4DLpyOfKLjV6214Zj5Fje3ImnruhGSZszy7MFxYdYS2Y6YIvTgyzeHUgczFejVoE7VV5ShFgajENOZmHx60TN04L2V3i8UAGHWnP4zqC24= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1pUR7uLNFxZJVYVi+mhlSRipcE6dy6dkvShnJIfaK4ITkZ002H8kTiCgzMTzoaUQxm+auDqVHXKxOEcqYQDwB8JOijkxo6eNtiB5h/VS8oaSYwcPtRTpHE+SgPlJUCmxnHHT8TD07lHcE+MDD30pEHeIrFUPi9JLyrdbbxkcPCw=; Message-ID: <442272.48575.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2iyMPTcVM1kBRCcQzYPyqbAPXoTxkTgHES67oBvzr_NPmQDeIY1qL_nVxmNHUwxXNJ9ON0LCTsOO.MoWlNpQAS2cjucVMmXyNI_KtyN5_KPxjox0bgzuRdALYz2AGUv6.V329UUWyzVnQOpJPTjmSoX8w1Kna0hqe6.9.TfOyPdP2lYrs5vQcKOkm7ZV8CDoREPo0slQPg5QwQFSMv2PmrhggbPreBUhATSrwRT320G1UQOft1ChSs4oU_mkBJiTTfIDNL2DrNx6oAn_JfWTprWEKQA8MERUYerJvqrlF9YQEGxubDAFyS4gyM6ElFAjf65o0afr3LdVvqJalhei.bde0A0o8L0JSWka3xPzWvR_zjp5rLOPhEvPu4sLvN6vPigf Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:55:16 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 References: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4061df20909112249l1aa9a5cdifa91ebbfd6e3a7e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:55:16 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: nodes lying idle To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4061df20909112249l1aa9a5cdifa91ebbfd6e3a7e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the tip. So is the value mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum for the entire cluster ? I had set the map.tasks.maximum to 6 and hitting the web interface it shows up that total map tasks for my job is just 6. My tasks are cpu intensive and hence I would like each of my quad core nodes to be running 4 hadoop map tasks atleast . The whole cluster is running just 6 and each of these 6 nodes is running 1 each. Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:49:41 AM Subject: Re: nodes lying idle You need to check your cluster's Map/Reduce task capacity. i.e. how many Map/Reduce task can run on cluster at once. You can check it on http://JobtrackerServerIP:50030. You should also check total number of map tasks in your job. It should be greater than map task capacity of the cluster. Intially reduce tasks will be idle till first batch of map task complete. -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Ive a cluster of 40 nodes. The input file has 2^18 lines and every line is > an input to a map job. Every node is a quad core and hence I've set > mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum to a value greater than 4. The > first 20 nodes are showing hadoop jobs taking 100% but with only one process > running while since its a quad core I would've liked to see 4 java processes > taking 100% (there are 5 java processes on this system but 4 are idle and > only one is taking 100% or 1 cpu). For the last half of the nodes, the cpu > usage of hadoop processes is 0. This is really strange since my map tasks > are processing in a very slow way and I wouldve liked to use all nodes and > all the cores. > > What could possibly be wrong ? It would really help if anyone could suggest > . > > thanks > > H > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > From general-return-503-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 12:22:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48879 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 12:22:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 12:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 5944 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 12:22:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5881 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 12:22:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5871 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 12:22:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:22:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.204] (HELO mail-pz0-f204.google.com) (209.85.222.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:22:33 +0000 Received: by pzk42 with SMTP id 42so1541279pzk.31 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bLbsPG/0hj0g8dTOSaNCDM1A5l9ZK0/Kk1btxDf1oBQ=; b=TEY0Iti17sMM8nM2xYMcCubV3ZOgeVnsvKNsKQhn5qcsWMrj8onpS2SvUGPTGxvqMz ARLjoikAB25Bv+yGPg/WQqRLVlin2N/KTj1VZOKSn4ureq6v2dZ9JX4CHjZoBp20QbLN paKwk4iU7Pl5vIw76jfrD39w1PrPtVUBbdo+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KCTmIMR6k0uNHBzwAKUQZ549tyDB/5kF7+Y8MscMx9SLVz4Lwf3h6J7zgKVXBVpFR8 ygTzt4NM9O5obdJaF8YolmdL+7nQbXKSN9B9+j93tK2nzl8QOz7mBk7Nf1Bfe97U35Nx knJKO4hXu2e2+XiCvyYEhMbigOWhaRud5OFaw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.113.4 with SMTP id q4mr7532416wam.54.1252758133077; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <442272.48575.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4061df20909112249l1aa9a5cdifa91ebbfd6e3a7e6@mail.gmail.com> <442272.48575.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:52:13 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df20909120522w437e0953g1e1524281bf275af@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: nodes lying idle From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64be86282fb970473607b44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64be86282fb970473607b44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 no *mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum* value is for single datanode. i.e. this many mappers and reducers will run on single datanode. for example if you have set *mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum = 4 **mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum = 4* and no. of datanodes = 40 then entire cluster's map task capacity = 4*40 = 160 *map.tasks.maximum* = 6 means only 6 maps will run for your job which will definitely not use all of your cluster resources. what is the size of your data? and what is your cluster specifications? -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks for the tip. > So is the value mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum for the entire > cluster ? I had set the map.tasks.maximum to 6 and hitting the web interface > it shows up that total map tasks for my job is just 6. My tasks are cpu > intensive and hence I would like each of my quad core nodes to be running 4 > hadoop map tasks atleast . The whole cluster is running just 6 and each of > these 6 nodes is running 1 each. > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:49:41 AM > Subject: Re: nodes lying idle > > You need to check your cluster's Map/Reduce task capacity. i.e. how many > Map/Reduce task can run on cluster at once. You can check it on > http://JobtrackerServerIP:50030. You should also check total number of map > tasks in your job. It should be greater than map task capacity of the > cluster. > > Intially reduce tasks will be idle till first batch of map task complete. > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM, himanshu chandola < > himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Ive a cluster of 40 nodes. The input file has 2^18 lines and every line > is > > an input to a map job. Every node is a quad core and hence I've set > > mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum to a value greater than 4. > The > > first 20 nodes are showing hadoop jobs taking 100% but with only one > process > > running while since its a quad core I would've liked to see 4 java > processes > > taking 100% (there are 5 java processes on this system but 4 are idle and > > only one is taking 100% or 1 cpu). For the last half of the nodes, the > cpu > > usage of hadoop processes is 0. This is really strange since my map tasks > > are processing in a very slow way and I wouldve liked to use all nodes > and > > all the cores. > > > > What could possibly be wrong ? It would really help if anyone could > suggest > > . > > > > thanks > > > > H > > > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > > Neo: No. > > Morpheus: Why Not? > > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e64be86282fb970473607b44-- From general-return-504-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 12 23:28:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60286 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2009 23:28:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2009 23:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 80622 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 23:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80553 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2009 23:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80543 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2009 23:28:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:28:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of deepak.halale@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:28:21 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1765138pxi.20 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=wSKZxT+M4UYIMdHC0zdv2bWUfCidMcISBc3YitU3Uks=; b=feg0ajYOaEb856ihVo13W/9nnpn/HLx5R2+ueBI9unNdZkUziYHyo9FsCd3Wj9FCR3 HvrHKNt1KpaLFrjB1rvbKLvhV7oLz46ZXTzmZnQjahD7DKOCpoOZ2BNabXEk08QW51wR lZ8K5yVqoZVP/A1qZJYhXabXtRI+8zR+OZZLA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=knFO3UmCvcrrH6ls9FWaLD6qWmf5lxuaX0b7hXvVEFbPR4R5XBS2J5Oh6Ec86Yidd7 Ew5S2cqJyKzJukyIS09cznpUEAy9ItX+tKLCbmx4QpkoO1AEqh5BHSfVUQzyC8h17xFd D8zdnjpVY2k6rpGnshPcKEibqDjlZN+3L3Bmw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.115.14 with SMTP id s14mr8297604wam.189.1252798079673; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:27:59 -0400 Message-ID: <15678300909121627w7a9c2244rc10c60e8bdbdd468@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop Map/Reduce and Hive clarification From: Deepak Halale To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e648f5de83a775047369c817 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e648f5de83a775047369c817 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am new to Hadoop , need some clarifications a) how to automate executing Map/Reduce jobs and also automating loading data in Hive, do I need to create a cron job or is there a better way. b) I have 2 tables as the source for M/R jobs 1) Order Master and Order detail OrderMaster has order header columns (OrderId,CustId,PaymentMethod,DeliveryMethod etc) OrderDetail has orders' item level information (viz. OrderId,ItemId,Quantity,SalesPrice,CostPrice,DeliveryAddress, Delivery State,DeliveryZip,DeliveryCountry) The relation between Master and Detail is 1 to many and OrderId is the key. If I generate a tab delimited file from each table, how does Reduce is going to aggregate the data from OrderDetail example If I have to sum the OrderRevenue by Order. Thanks Deepak --0016e648f5de83a775047369c817-- From general-return-505-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Sep 13 04:30:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2733 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2009 04:30:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Sep 2009 04:30:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 76146 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2009 04:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76065 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2009 04:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76055 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2009 04:30:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:30:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.32] (HELO web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:30:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 60614 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Sep 2009 04:30:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252816226; bh=kVQe3mvehjks9CTqYtkSAaqnky96GX8PF76Ub1PB83M=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BZFIeicgCY0zvO271P3vdBfcfWC7vIPTre/yyDjdGqR8QUpdXTnG2mh+DJykZCrEojxHUKVvjPE1YpXVjgkvh7eZwi0dO0la8HiIDvbqS4IJoPuaDN2PPTdJsaGxEx7XoMnkK7IFRPWU9LbX1FzM4fxu3+ZWco+SxhdDQSrr2CM= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=K+ZixPQwmXE6f75/ZwrDBJgUrEh+cEf8/Zywzi6SmdeXV474R2XLxTgyh+M8uxaZxUIzk1QRiyFF0TPbnrQHMigyG1Qyltf8fXlAhx8VE76BDZ9xV61MxpCbag6QtwNv9lQIu/56xUZZcEV2Cn9pRfmdG3/uLh9uEUDGWiW9CVs=; Message-ID: <285037.58660.qm@web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: R79w06IVM1lrZIwC05dg4f_HSaJNRV41t5bn5e6AiAAcq07EBIm3dYonAkInvo0qeknRSIPy5DRB_w92uAkpYMQflue4w1Ec_Sx7.ozjeE9vBrOPQl6pnOd.W1hBUD7cXgETTOgaCtufudylBM3eMB7R2c_Z3YX.F72OShRK0wBJaT5ycVqW56EvDdWY9X5M1PitnhGBNNJAxgJ9DqFs__y4w5XmwSRw22DzUJgnhN3HFAw6Nt_9bDuBOBDQit9ca7opIS91k2KcGbHIRo8uW2nn.wJriu4iHBfCek239DeGYd3gdcOqYF6QEyMy5A5O4G906Hdq9n_mGhwrUPuqvJUFMjg80f.dOeTdUSbSFvr8EgsMkUZJbjn8VzY1T9afWmdP Received: from [75.69.131.160] by web38401.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:30:26 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 References: <17178.56716.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4061df20909112249l1aa9a5cdifa91ebbfd6e3a7e6@mail.gmail.com> <442272.48575.qm@web38408.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4061df20909120522w437e0953g1e1524281bf275af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:30:26 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: nodes lying idle To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4061df20909120522w437e0953g1e1524281bf275af@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, I used JobConf.setNumMapTasks and it worked. I used setNumMapTasks(40) and I ended up with 100 maps rather than the 6 I had initially. The size of my data is 32 mb but every line is converted into an object and the computations are cpu intensive so I would like to have as many map jobs as there are cores. There is no xml entry of the type map.tasks.maximum. I'm using cloudera's distribution 0.18.3-14. Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 8:22:13 AM Subject: Re: nodes lying idle no *mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum* value is for single datanode. i.e. this many mappers and reducers will run on single datanode. for example if you have set *mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum = 4 **mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum = 4* and no. of datanodes = 40 then entire cluster's map task capacity = 4*40 = 160 *map.tasks.maximum* = 6 means only 6 maps will run for your job which will definitely not use all of your cluster resources. what is the size of your data? and what is your cluster specifications? -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, himanshu chandola < himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks for the tip. > So is the value mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum for the entire > cluster ? I had set the map.tasks.maximum to 6 and hitting the web interface > it shows up that total map tasks for my job is just 6. My tasks are cpu > intensive and hence I would like each of my quad core nodes to be running 4 > hadoop map tasks atleast . The whole cluster is running just 6 and each of > these 6 nodes is running 1 each. > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > Neo: No. > Morpheus: Why Not? > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 1:49:41 AM > Subject: Re: nodes lying idle > > You need to check your cluster's Map/Reduce task capacity. i.e. how many > Map/Reduce task can run on cluster at once. You can check it on > http://JobtrackerServerIP:50030. You should also check total number of map > tasks in your job. It should be greater than map task capacity of the > cluster. > > Intially reduce tasks will be idle till first batch of map task complete. > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM, himanshu chandola < > himanshu_coolguy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Ive a cluster of 40 nodes. The input file has 2^18 lines and every line > is > > an input to a map job. Every node is a quad core and hence I've set > > mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum to a value greater than 4. > The > > first 20 nodes are showing hadoop jobs taking 100% but with only one > process > > running while since its a quad core I would've liked to see 4 java > processes > > taking 100% (there are 5 java processes on this system but 4 are idle and > > only one is taking 100% or 1 cpu). For the last half of the nodes, the > cpu > > usage of hadoop processes is 0. This is really strange since my map tasks > > are processing in a very slow way and I wouldve liked to use all nodes > and > > all the cores. > > > > What could possibly be wrong ? It would really help if anyone could > suggest > > . > > > > thanks > > > > H > > > > Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? > > Neo: No. > > Morpheus: Why Not? > > Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From general-return-506-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 02:27:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1548 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 02:27:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 02:27:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 37909 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 02:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37839 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 02:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37829 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 02:27:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:27:19 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so795982qwb.35 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: edward@udanax.org Received: by 10.224.13.205 with SMTP id d13mr4753281qaa.217.1252895218333; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:26:58 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 16ac46d4d8fd0eea Message-ID: Subject: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hama-dev@incubator.apache.org, hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Paolo Castagna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello communities, I'm the one of the Hamburg (provisional name), which is the graph computing framework on Hadoop sponsor. Now we're working on the perfection of our prototype project, and we'll propose the Hamburg project soon. - http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hamburg, a wiki page - http://throb.googlecode.com/, a prototype project BTW, before we decide to propose, we need time just to consider where it belongs to. Since it aims to create a "general graph computing framework" on Hadoop, I'd like to propose it as a sub-project of Hadoop. On the other hand, since the matrix and graph are both in the domain of scientific computing and BSP model could be used for matrix computation areas, I think this project also can be integrated with the Hama project. WDYT? Any advices are welcome. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardyoon@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org From general-return-507-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 04:10:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33061 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 04:10:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 04:10:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 99870 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 04:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99682 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 04:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99657 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 04:10:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:10:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.35] (HELO emailgw04.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:09:54 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,381,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="12136164" Received: from emailbh02.pnl.gov ([130.20.128.50]) by emailgw04.pnl.gov with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2009 21:09:32 -0700 Received: from EMAIL02.pnl.gov ([130.20.128.221]) by emailbh02.pnl.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:09:32 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:09:31 -0700 Message-ID: <12A8FC4D0563D1468AD23AAAED861A3EDE081D@EMAIL02.pnl.gov> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing Thread-Index: Aco04uzokcSvL0NYTm2SCXEpGPryPQABCFUA References: From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: , , Cc: "Paolo Castagna" , "Taylor, Ronald C" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2009 04:09:32.0370 (UTC) FILETIME=[29A19B20:01CA34F1] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Mr. Yoon, I was delighted to hear of your proposed Hamburg project. I am a new user of Hadoop (and Hbase). It looks like that I will be spending a substantial amount of time working in this environment over the next couple years, for both DOE bioinformatics work (my primary field) and for work funded by DoD. I am enthusiastic about using Hadoop, Hive, Hbase. Also am quite interested in the Mahout project. While I cannot offer advice as to where to place your new project within the Apache framework, I did want to offer my support. I believe that it could well be of value in the coming years both to me, for my bioinformatics research, and to other researchers here at PNNL working in the areas of social networks (in our national security directorate) and in a set of projects directed toward making the electrical grid "smarter". I would not be able to contribute any code until I found funding from current or new projects for my time. But if Hamburg moves forward and can demonstrate its usefulness, that might be a real possibility.=20 And in regards to funding for getting you some help: if you can find a collaborator based at a university or non-profit, said collaborator could well apply for a grant from the US National Science Foundation for open source Hadoop-based development of graph computing / mining algorithms. The NSF Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate is awarding grants specifically devoted to the area of graph mining (at least this year - hopefully will continue next year - anyway, NSF gives money for algorithm and tool development in general - friendly to that). I can't apply (at least not directly) - NSF does not like to give money to other US government labs. But I would think you could find someone in academia - perhaps someone already working with the Mahout group. It would appear a natural fit. I presume there are a number of people associated with the Apache org who know something about the NSF and could offer further advice in that direction. I look forward to hearing more about Hamburg, as it progresses. Best, Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, MSIN K7-90 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov www.pnl.gov -----Original Message----- From: edward@udanax.org [mailto:edward@udanax.org] On Behalf Of Edward J. Yoon Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:27 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hama-dev@incubator.apache.org; hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Paolo Castagna Subject: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing Hello communities, I'm the one of the Hamburg (provisional name), which is the graph computing framework on Hadoop sponsor. Now we're working on the perfection of our prototype project, and we'll propose the Hamburg project soon. - http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hamburg, a wiki page - http://throb.googlecode.com/, a prototype project BTW, before we decide to propose, we need time just to consider where it belongs to. Since it aims to create a "general graph computing framework" on Hadoop, I'd like to propose it as a sub-project of Hadoop. On the other hand, since the matrix and graph are both in the domain of scientific computing and BSP model could be used for matrix computation areas, I think this project also can be integrated with the Hama project. WDYT? Any advices are welcome. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardyoon@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org From general-return-508-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 17:07:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90055 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 17:07:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 17:07:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 90649 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 17:07:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90575 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 17:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90562 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 17:07:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:07:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.218] (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.220.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:06:59 +0000 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so2350752fxm.29 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Y7ThtrYUcMNZqp4jDmVuXSvbX+uGkrydHRL7aPlZm/s=; b=ntgARpIBaB7M+8Pn/6wQ/JJdoi9FC73ZA4rr8FWpJ5xijcNIYklZrFyXOlZQVYmbDc pLnceY8FhjhMEqXEOSSjazCjk4FVOtje9KDqZn5XMaIbfvMfsrPfJJw5PVeL1p5p0VhF gHqDgxmLqO9a8Sq5ZdbcLvKYfdyboBYLa3k6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ayuMMoxbeX9myunyy4gtof+MeeFzGELDx/sTH2KLuF8qYaArc7r+naoxnZpwNLi3Lt E9UNlwsgJMQfN1Ib/9Ywg4nPr5ygQ+YXA/iaJRVKUaazrDExg3OQf4/3/NSdYrWyAZFP nxtsDlOdJlPlI8dHWKVi1kgxPyvJ1SkBF+cME= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.48.20 with SMTP id a20mr2753493muk.121.1252947998093; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:06:38 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00909141006i2afea592mbca25fa6605ecf73@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Problems with hadoop 0.18.0 plugin and Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo) From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6546f3e59327104738cb0d3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6546f3e59327104738cb0d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi people! I=B4m a newbie of Hadoop and I=B4d like to have an integrated environment for Hadoop and Pig in the same Eclipse Galileo distribution. Th= e Pig plugin (PigPen) works properly but the Hadoop plugin only lets me brows= e the DFS server location (in a remote Virtual Machine) and not sending jobs. Could anyone help me with this problem? Thanks a lot. --=20 Alberto --0016e6546f3e59327104738cb0d3-- From general-return-509-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 17:34:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1265 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 17:34:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 17:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 34773 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 17:34:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34719 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 17:34:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34709 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 17:34:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.holloway@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.204] (HELO mail-yx0-f204.google.com) (209.85.210.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:57 +0000 Received: by yxe42 with SMTP id 42so4346975yxe.31 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6l+KsVjmliGvaTmW2EVXUDlim9Vd8hC8zTLjTqmiAYQ=; b=iVdXeDjQHa4kj+3IodG8Cpwr9kBpNm6ejQ+ARzoyhXuNZLa9Q/1+ZR3pZ4amYmE9Qb cAiMJpE8HLVx5n/oAHF1q9FN+PL9ilKhE/JiTwMVWqkdvZd64Zl302qMpAgmyKvPswaV RxM5ffmoWWXGhy3OLxf4jqUDaoNNfgMV8p19g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k1nVXVe0w4tBUB3KL/k+LS+qBZUaEoEYPgOegJEbaUupgCfuKQHe73Pt+NZbA0kwuW JHb8WFnYi8N+rV5oxeZt2ZjCkHftF/B0q5VaNy17awGsIKJaV/NyxffYVCHJjm1Gi6eo eVuteIUiOzv+CDGmSf4TR02MeUhMlO+2qdyc8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.209.23 with SMTP id l23mr6403513anq.173.1252949616059; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:36 -0700 Message-ID: <11c4fb4d0909141033n2491565dt9128b86e35ae1cf2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop and Small Files From: Jonathan Holloway To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d3cf14c966f104738d10a0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d3cf14c966f104738d10a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I'm new to Hadoop and currently looking at it for a project where there is around a few TB of data that needs to be stored in a format suitable for MapReduce functions. The problem is that I'm dealing with small text files (including metadata) of 10Kb in size (and upwards to a few MB) that need to be stored in some format. The files need to be accessed randomly with very low latency. I've been through the docs and previous posts on the mailing list, and looked at the following options: * HDFS - not suitable "as is" because of the 64MB block size * HAR (Hadoop Archives) - not sure about random access to files within format * Sequence Files - slow to convert into this format, can't randomly access the files * CombineFileInputFormat - assuming you still can't access the files randomly https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565 * MapFile - looks good... but not sure about latency http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/MapFile.html * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, has this improved with the 0.20 release? Please correct if I'm wrong re: the assumptions above. Which is the most appropriate option here? Many thanks... Jon. --0016e6d3cf14c966f104738d10a0-- From general-return-510-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 19:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39030 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 19:10:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 19:10:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 98789 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 19:10:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98734 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 19:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98724 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 19:10:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:10:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.218] (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.220.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:10:24 +0000 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so2435015fxm.29 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.163.5 with SMTP id l5mr5358965fge.3.1252955404094; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <309f76d00909141006i2afea592mbca25fa6605ecf73@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00909141006i2afea592mbca25fa6605ecf73@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:09:44 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100909141209y6f10fc02y9f75378cffeaacc1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with hadoop 0.18.0 plugin and Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo) To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636025e9ac7cc1904738e6943 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636025e9ac7cc1904738e6943 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You might want to chime in at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3744 . People have seen that patch fix it for them. -- Philip On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi people! I=B4m a newbie of Hadoop and I=B4d like to have an integrated > environment for Hadoop and Pig in the same Eclipse Galileo distribution. > The > Pig plugin (PigPen) works properly but the Hadoop plugin only lets me > browse > the DFS server location (in a remote Virtual Machine) and not sending job= s. > Could anyone help me with this problem? > Thanks a lot. > > -- > Alberto > --001636025e9ac7cc1904738e6943-- From general-return-511-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 19:16:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40263 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 19:16:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 19:16:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 5464 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 19:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5376 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 19:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5366 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 19:16:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:16:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.214] (HELO mail-bw0-f214.google.com) (209.85.218.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:16:01 +0000 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so2424184bwz.29 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uzvbpEWYuxLXeMlC8JKeYhajOUCy5Qo7qUrhY8wkw38=; b=gVuFcuiWSXciuMJEPjiLQIPggTmkt4QVS7DD5FqclJy4BXg2EpS7UU6WVr/xvYyxpO dK6qo61Qu5MZ6x+/AiK0hpmE/c44bKgyRwDMlAWV6c9pIHfas2s+Yd2GgEfGuVEYedGQ 1VE/dPZLcoqWo2HP4lcFqI/uYwB2irJQ/RuKk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=REf7SSuAdLAKQRAJNLPKeIZNVvlEcRPDLq47I9fh68AA8EjyZvNwNMsQuB1E1pATwA /gnKhvcklkeyssFXRAssALz0iobj+Wj2Lz7uakfjQ3ddWyhJQAmhlLuxMT4RmRK/1jYh 2MKNOsSu3BuC4BhP4qQ6EO4jQ2YFev65ZlPAc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.226.17 with SMTP id y17mr2844161mug.67.1252955737815; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100909141209y6f10fc02y9f75378cffeaacc1@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00909141006i2afea592mbca25fa6605ecf73@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100909141209y6f10fc02y9f75378cffeaacc1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:15:37 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00909141215g4917ac1fg1468ba473348611e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with hadoop 0.18.0 plugin and Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo) From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d205babfb7c04738e7d60 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364d205babfb7c04738e7d60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks a lot for the quick reply. I=B4ll take a look. 2009/9/14 Philip Zeyliger > You might want to chime in at > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3744 . People have seen that > patch fix it for them. > > -- Philip > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi people! I=B4m a newbie of Hadoop and I=B4d like to have an integrate= d > > environment for Hadoop and Pig in the same Eclipse Galileo distribution= . > > The > > Pig plugin (PigPen) works properly but the Hadoop plugin only lets me > > browse > > the DFS server location (in a remote Virtual Machine) and not sending > jobs. > > Could anyone help me with this problem? > > Thanks a lot. > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > --=20 Alberto --0016364d205babfb7c04738e7d60-- From general-return-512-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 14 20:19:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64642 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 20:19:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 20:19:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 15335 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 20:19:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15260 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 20:19:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15250 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 20:19:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:19:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.46.182.51] (HELO relay.ihostexchange.net) (66.46.182.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:19:25 +0000 Received: from VMBX115.ihostexchange.net ([192.168.30.15]) by HUB101.ihostexchange.net ([66.46.182.51]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:19:03 -0400 From: Sam Baskinger To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:19:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Hadoop and Small Files Thread-Topic: Hadoop and Small Files Thread-Index: Aco1YZOTp2CN7GQcQ7q9ULm5KVTNpwAFwSpS Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <11c4fb4d0909141033n2491565dt9128b86e35ae1cf2@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6D40F6412CFsambaskingernetworkedinsightscom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6D40F6412CFsambaskingernetworkedinsightscom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Jon, I don't know how many seconds would constitute low latency for your applica= tion, but I would guess that Hadoop simply will not cut it. I would recomme= nd something closer to Grid-SQL. If you absolutely must process all the files using MapReduce, perhaps you c= an split them all up into 1GB files and process them as a fraction of the l= arger problem? Just a thought. Sam On 9/14/09 12:33 PM, "Jonathan Holloway" wrot= e: Hi all, I'm new to Hadoop and currently looking at it for a project where there is around a few TB of data that needs to be stored in a format suitable for MapReduce functions. The problem is that I'm dealing with small text files (including metadata) of 10Kb in size (and upwards to a few MB) that need to be stored in some format. The files need to be accessed randomly with very low latency. I've been through the docs and previous posts on th= e mailing list, and looked at the following options: * HDFS - not suitable "as is" because of the 64MB block size * HAR (Hadoop Archives) - not sure about random access to files within format * Sequence Files - slow to convert into this format, can't randomly access the files * CombineFileInputFormat - assuming you still can't access the files randomly https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565 * MapFile - looks good... but not sure about latency http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/MapFi= le.html * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, has this improved with the 0.20 release? Please correct if I'm wrong re: the assumptions above. Which is the most appropriate option here? Many thanks... Jon. Sam Baskinger Software Engineer Networked Insights, Inc. This e-mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intende= d recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. An= y unauthorized review, use, disclosure, duplication or distribution is proh= ibited. If you received this message in error, please notify me by phone o= r return email, do not forward to any other person and permanently delete t= he foregoing message, all attachments and all copies immediately. --_000_C6D40F6412CFsambaskingernetworkedinsightscom_-- From general-return-513-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 01:16:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60775 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 01:16:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 01:16:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 6573 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 01:16:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6507 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 01:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6497 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 01:16:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:16:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matthew.kelcey@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com) (209.85.219.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:15:55 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so3626743ewy.36 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=S8fMgrlgFuWNPj8yI82ifni/RD4Ba7BweSbA3KRj0tY=; b=RpaxG3bQrtctXPVbirxfc2pVle4KzKCqpWCfsJ7fbYX+rEo5QqY3FX9ES0dOtlO/3a 9f5aMIaq6wMF+SL7lXvqFraLGgLUVjE6qYtMZckckFr6/NAzATD4KFF2IYeO0MyXtAaf pckG0qUtjHP4C8oPWqHwT9XE5nOw6CHZPSu8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vVdP/vmJjlVOCOzbhqbFtFkQTkOCb1bEzll0EH3RmdV90iW+mzjAmAbS2c2CruIl2B C+FzuQorYsuztQswzurbe2uzpLlv5b9C9lm5cyCZR4rJJWXY3Y5FPySkQXw8xMX2F+b1 /HixJSp1vcS0VFGdgZhVOn9OnPRW7yDaHoIAw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.131.39 with SMTP id i39mr7685597ebn.98.1252977274426; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:14:34 +1000 Message-ID: <93d501de0909141814vaa8c9c0wc5a47ee05baae7de@mail.gmail.com> Subject: hadoop scales but is not performant? From: Mat Kelcey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi all, recently i've started playing with hadoop and my first learning experiment has surprised me i'm implementing a a text problem; trying to extract infrequent phrases using a mixture of probabilistic models. it's a bit of toy problem so the algorithm details aren't super important, though the implementation might be.... this problem ended up being represented by a dozen or so map reduce jobs of various types including some aggregate steps and some manual joins. (see the bottom of this page for details http://matpalm.com/sip/take3_markov_chains.html) i've implemented each step using ruby / streaming, the code is at http://github.com/matpalm/sip if anyone cares. i ran some tests using 10 ec2 medium cpu instance across a small 100mb's of gzipped text. for validation of the results i also reimplemented the entire algorithm as a single threaded ruby app my surprise comes from finding that the ruby implementation outperforms the 10 ec2 instances on this data size... i ran a few samples of different sizes with the graph at the bottom of http://matpalm.com/sip/part4_but_does_it_scale.html so why is this? here are my explanations in order of how confident i am... a) 100mb is peanuts and hadoop was made for 1000x this size so the test is invalid. b) there is a better representation of this problem that uses fewer map/reduce passes. c) streaming is too slow and rewriting in java (and making use of techniques like chaining mappers) would speed things up d) doing these steps, particularly the joins, in pig would be faster my next steps are to rewrite some of the steps in pig to sample the difference does anyone have any high level comments on this? cheers, mat From general-return-514-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 05:15:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4503 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 05:15:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 05:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 49324 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 05:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49241 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 05:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49231 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 05:15:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:15:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.204] (HELO mail-pz0-f204.google.com) (209.85.222.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:15:26 +0000 Received: by pzk42 with SMTP id 42so3186946pzk.31 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.165.12 with SMTP id n12mr13032833wae.107.1252991644291; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm627308pzk.10.2009.09.14.22.13.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AAF2286.4050105@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:13:42 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop and Small Files References: <11c4fb4d0909141033n2491565dt9128b86e35ae1cf2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11c4fb4d0909141033n2491565dt9128b86e35ae1cf2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > The files need to be accessed randomly with very low latency Then use: * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, has this improved with the 0.20 release? Yes, latency is significantly better with 0.20, see preso from hadoop summit on results: http://devblog.streamy.com/2009/07/24/streamy-hadoop-summit-hbase-goes-realtime/ -- amr Jonathan Holloway wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to Hadoop and currently looking at it for a project where there is > around a few TB of data that needs to be stored > in a format suitable for MapReduce functions. The problem is that I'm > dealing with small text files (including metadata) > of 10Kb in size (and upwards to a few MB) that need to be stored in some > format. The files need to be accessed randomly > with very low latency. I've been through the docs and previous posts on the > mailing list, and looked at the following options: > > * HDFS - not suitable "as is" because of the 64MB block size > * HAR (Hadoop Archives) - not sure about random access to files within > format > * Sequence Files - slow to convert into this format, can't randomly access > the files > * CombineFileInputFormat - assuming you still can't access the files > randomly https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565 > * MapFile - looks good... but not sure about latency > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/MapFile.html > * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, > has this improved with the 0.20 release? > > Please correct if I'm wrong re: the assumptions above. Which is the most > appropriate option here? > > Many thanks... > Jon. > > From general-return-515-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 05:23:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7337 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 05:23:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 05:23:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 55824 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 05:23:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55753 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 05:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55743 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 05:23:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.holloway@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.204] (HELO mail-yx0-f204.google.com) (209.85.210.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:23:00 +0000 Received: by yxe42 with SMTP id 42so5030362yxe.31 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:21:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WPyf6rq4jJgKDgZKqTRMplZUiymgv7OJdzhcdkpmUUo=; b=k7fJtXS0q2O89oa28x+yCXRu5OJY1HvuH8adtY+wGxhQ8JessI5ptDi/wp/2wGu3vO fBNvA/NOB4ihPKvSORHyB+GjSSYikaNGdm5W5NDU9fp7BDc+tLI7bnKSp2JKbpgonG1f iLn1s92NNdVNxOabvDf1k+Y5YGZhDOXiMuBfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MP+psXgwDLmnFvRLI+amgCkQ48wPg9P4fjJnUUuDb+ES3ZhuG5wtFhYOxQAgQfw3Sr HkP7lJvlDoX1RCJ/xDptpPo/MJ02ncIRYJsSjvXrQ6YObDPrq6wg6+urLqSK7kDsmdD1 XRrK0bGxUwsX6n6Q+fHHQIUvfFNDDPK7fOeE0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.129.9 with SMTP id g9mr7038331ann.115.1252992097830; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:21:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AAF2286.4050105@cloudera.com> References: <11c4fb4d0909141033n2491565dt9128b86e35ae1cf2@mail.gmail.com> <4AAF2286.4050105@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:21:37 -0700 Message-ID: <11c4fb4d0909142221j6a94f19eu7cfe5a41279b868b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop and Small Files From: Jonathan Holloway To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e2b7ce5c7c4047396f4eb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016368e2b7ce5c7c4047396f4eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all... Many thanks for your help and the responses, currently investigating HBase 0.20 as a potential option... 2009/9/14 Amr Awadallah > > The files need to be accessed randomly with very low latency > > Then use: > > * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, > has this improved with the 0.20 release? > > Yes, latency is significantly better with 0.20, see preso from hadoop > summit on results: > > > http://devblog.streamy.com/2009/07/24/streamy-hadoop-summit-hbase-goes-realtime/ > > -- amr > > > Jonathan Holloway wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm new to Hadoop and currently looking at it for a project where there is >> around a few TB of data that needs to be stored >> in a format suitable for MapReduce functions. The problem is that I'm >> dealing with small text files (including metadata) >> of 10Kb in size (and upwards to a few MB) that need to be stored in some >> format. The files need to be accessed randomly >> with very low latency. I've been through the docs and previous posts on >> the >> mailing list, and looked at the following options: >> >> * HDFS - not suitable "as is" because of the 64MB block size >> * HAR (Hadoop Archives) - not sure about random access to files within >> format >> * Sequence Files - slow to convert into this format, can't randomly access >> the files >> * CombineFileInputFormat - assuming you still can't access the files >> randomly https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565 >> * MapFile - looks good... but not sure about latency >> >> http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/MapFile.html >> * HBase (or similar distributed key-value store) - not sure about latency, >> has this improved with the 0.20 release? >> >> Please correct if I'm wrong re: the assumptions above. Which is the most >> appropriate option here? >> >> Many thanks... >> Jon. >> >> >> > -- Design and Tech-noogly Web: http://www.oogly.co.uk Mail: jonathan.holloway@oogly.co.uk IM:jonathan_philip_holloway@hotmail.com --0016368e2b7ce5c7c4047396f4eb-- From general-return-516-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 08:33:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83395 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 08:33:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 08:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 40813 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 08:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40731 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 08:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40721 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 08:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:33:18 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1123973qwb.35 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:31:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: edward@udanax.org Received: by 10.224.12.141 with SMTP id x13mr5924774qax.337.1253003156829; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:25:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12A8FC4D0563D1468AD23AAAED861A3EDE081D@EMAIL02.pnl.gov> References: <12A8FC4D0563D1468AD23AAAED861A3EDE081D@EMAIL02.pnl.gov> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:25:56 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 40b425b73b1cf80a Message-ID: Subject: Re: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org, hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com, Paolo Castagna , "Taylor, Ronald C" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for interesting information. With hindsight, IMO, the Hama project is a best to incubate Hamburg project. and, we can consider again when prepare to graduate from incubator. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Taylor, Ronald C w= rote: > Hello Mr. Yoon, > > I was delighted to hear of your proposed Hamburg project. I am a new > user of Hadoop (and Hbase). It looks like that I will be spending a > substantial amount of time working in this environment over the next > couple years, for both DOE bioinformatics work (my primary field) and > for work funded by DoD. I am enthusiastic about using Hadoop, Hive, > Hbase. Also am quite interested in the Mahout project. > > While I cannot offer advice as to where to place your new project within > the Apache framework, I did want to offer my support. I believe that it > could well be of value in the coming years both to me, for my > bioinformatics research, and to other researchers here at PNNL working > in the areas of social networks (in our national security directorate) > and in a set of projects directed toward making the electrical grid > "smarter". I would not be able to contribute any code until I found > funding from current or new projects for my time. But if Hamburg moves > forward and can demonstrate its usefulness, that might be a real > possibility. > > And in regards to funding for getting you some help: if you can find a > collaborator based at a university or non-profit, said collaborator > could well apply for a grant from the US National Science Foundation for > open source Hadoop-based development of graph computing / mining > algorithms. The NSF Computer and Information Science and Engineering > Directorate is awarding grants specifically devoted to the area of graph > mining (at least this year - hopefully will continue next year - anyway, > NSF gives money for algorithm and tool development in general - friendly > to that). I can't apply (at least not directly) - NSF does not like to > give money to other US government labs. But I would think you could find > someone in academia - perhaps someone already working with the Mahout > group. It would appear a natural fit. I presume there are a number of > people associated with the Apache org who know something about the NSF > and could offer further advice in that direction. > > I look forward to hearing more about Hamburg, as it progresses. > > =C2=A0Best, > =C2=A0Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, MSIN K7-90 > Richland, WA =C2=A099352 USA > Office: =C2=A0509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > www.pnl.gov > > > -----Original Message----- > From: edward@udanax.org [mailto:edward@udanax.org] On Behalf Of Edward > J. Yoon > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:27 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hama-dev@incubator.apache.org; > hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com > Cc: Paolo Castagna > Subject: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing > > Hello communities, > > I'm the one of the Hamburg (provisional name), which is the graph > computing framework on Hadoop sponsor. Now we're working on the > perfection of our prototype project, and we'll propose the Hamburg > project soon. > > - http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hamburg, a wiki page > - http://throb.googlecode.com/, a prototype project > > BTW, before we decide to propose, we need time just to consider where it > belongs to. > > Since it aims to create a "general graph computing framework" on Hadoop, > I'd like to propose it as a sub-project of Hadoop. On the other hand, > since the matrix and graph are both in the domain of scientific > computing and BSP model could be used for matrix computation areas, I > think this project also can be integrated with the Hama project. > > WDYT? Any advices are welcome. > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. > edwardyoon@apache.org > http://blog.udanax.org > --=20 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardyoon@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org From general-return-517-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 13:01:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69949 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 12102 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12028 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12018 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:01:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:00:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BEFB7D67 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:00:27 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QL8k8uc3ZyDH for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:00:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53EAB7CE4 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:00:20 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1253624407.58742@mdYF2cbz0rs/TrYdxfiVFw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n8FD06Ca018869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:00:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4AAF8FD6.7010703@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:00:06 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop and universities/research Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n8FD06Ca018869 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've stuck up a little slideset with some thoughts on what we could be doing to get tighter engagement between universities and the Hadoop codebase http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/hadoop-and-universities There are various levels of engagement - teaching MapReduce and other datacentre-scale coding techiques. This could be done by getting involved with the undergrad/grad teachers, helping with the lectures and the coursework. Remember , most universities do welcome outside lecturers giving guest talks to the students. - encourage scientific computation to be done on top of Hadoop. There's a small problem there, cluster time, which means that people with access to datacentres with CPU and storage to spare need to lift a hand here. Or we help get Hadoop up on the existing clusters the physicists run. [ see http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/hadoop-hep for some plans here] - encourage people doing maths and CS work to do it on Hadoop. The plugins for scheduling and placement are a good low-risk place we can get people involved, the other area of interest is stuff on top, such as graphs and other leading-edge stuff. - get some of the people doing work in this area to talk at apachecon. Come on, you want to know how do debug a particle accelerator experiment that generates 1PB/month of data but which only 50 events/year are actually interesting. Term-time is rushing up, so now might be a good time for Apache to get ready to bring the universities on board. I'm going to start by proposing we create a hadoop-research list, for people doing more researchy stuff on top of and inside hadoop. we can then start identifying who is interested in this area, which academic and industrial people are involved, where they are, start meeting up. We had a good little workshop at Bristol University last month http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/BristolHadoopWorkshop ; it was good to get together the different groups. Thoughts? -steve From general-return-518-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 16:22:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51142 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 16:22:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 16:22:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 46388 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 16:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46324 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 16:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46314 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 16:22:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:22:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:21:58 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.197] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c143.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.143]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n8FGIdHq057237 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:18:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Jb3H9gzMhyfauF3zfqWDRmvWvOaPX8YEz4pyUa0hKgbdpxmFvv9KFsQiCIPBLZYa Message-Id: <216DCE46-71A1-4FFA-B7AA-1028EB6EBEF5@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <93d501de0909141814vaa8c9c0wc5a47ee05baae7de@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:18:39 -0700 References: <93d501de0909141814vaa8c9c0wc5a47ee05baae7de@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Some thoughts, inlined. Alan. On Sep 14, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Mat Kelcey wrote: > hi all, > > recently i've started playing with hadoop and my first learning > experiment has surprised me > > i'm implementing a a text problem; trying to extract infrequent > phrases using a mixture of probabilistic models. > it's a bit of toy problem so the algorithm details aren't super > important, though the implementation might be.... > > this problem ended up being represented by a dozen or so map reduce > jobs of various types including some aggregate steps and some manual > joins. > (see the bottom of this page for details > http://matpalm.com/sip/take3_markov_chains.html) > > i've implemented each step using ruby / streaming, the code is at > http://github.com/matpalm/sip if anyone cares. > > i ran some tests using 10 ec2 medium cpu instance across a small > 100mb's of gzipped text. > for validation of the results i also reimplemented the entire > algorithm as a single threaded ruby app > > my surprise comes from finding that the ruby implementation > outperforms the 10 ec2 instances on this data size... > i ran a few samples of different sizes with the graph at the bottom of > http://matpalm.com/sip/part4_but_does_it_scale.html > > so why is this? here are my explanations in order of how confident i > am... > > a) 100mb is peanuts and hadoop was made for 1000x this size so the > test is invalid. Definitely the case. At this size your start costs will swamp any performance benefits of parallelism. > b) there is a better representation of this problem that uses fewer > map/reduce passes. > c) streaming is too slow and rewriting in java (and making use of > techniques like chaining mappers) would speed things up Maybe. Streaming itself is a little slower than using java. I don't know what the penalty of using java versus ruby is. > d) doing these steps, particularly the joins, in pig would be faster Writing your joins in Pig will definitely be faster to code. They won't be faster to execute unless you are able to use one of Pig's specialized join algorithms (fragment-replicate, merge, skew). At 100mb its hard to see that any of those will make a big difference. > > my next steps are to rewrite some of the steps in pig to sample the > difference > > does anyone have any high level comments on this? > > cheers, > mat From general-return-519-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 21:06:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64449 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 21:06:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 21:06:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 75525 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 21:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75486 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 21:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75476 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 21:06:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:06:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthew.kelcey@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:06:00 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 22so814245eye.23 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MhOTplPqJIsl8etc468PU7J6yQISHH4ihEVqV8IVvhI=; b=ql4Eam3E59MgVrwlMu5wW3SRxYLruxIS0Kvk+Ne8Emig5qXeJY+nTe3rtUSmhJNifh EAaLw2eyd4n5Os3GlTdTz9y3m7NzIkPH1/T2laQoP9aKLnhnqMT0qByiw5mZaWEIYWLA jntKg+Ciw7TahusR+uiDRu61qpwtyk9RZ0QbM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TkCeRExQD1tN80/oTtsDknPMD7bNhUI0WDlWB0qN5hkOm8Spr75zxLQ5ksR/C1a7v+ 7dX9H2QCM5Xl6+aMQ0/qdEB5CmlfFJv4p+cOwu1PIrwOc+e6j7XYgDP0ovU5F/Kt4mnI Htr/5G8Wip4dhWyLp3447n9OoiK0UaE8xTLeM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.147.26 with SMTP id z26mr1355300ebn.73.1253048739568; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:05:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <216DCE46-71A1-4FFA-B7AA-1028EB6EBEF5@yahoo-inc.com> References: <93d501de0909141814vaa8c9c0wc5a47ee05baae7de@mail.gmail.com> <216DCE46-71A1-4FFA-B7AA-1028EB6EBEF5@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:39 +1000 Message-ID: <93d501de0909151405t39c1f919h1629d373fa033466@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? From: Mat Kelcey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >>[me] >> a) 100mb is peanuts and hadoop was made for 1000x this size so the >> test is invalid. >[Alan] > Definitely the case. =A0At this size your start costs will swamp any > performance benefits of parallelism. cheers, thanks alan was pretty sure this was the case. mat From general-return-520-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 21:41:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76522 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 21:41:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 21:41:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19434 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 21:41:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19314 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 21:41:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19211 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 21:41:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:41:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.204] (HELO mail-yx0-f204.google.com) (209.85.210.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:41:41 +0000 Received: by yxe42 with SMTP id 42so5976979yxe.31 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:41:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.76.5 with SMTP id d5mr4870203agl.68.1253050879535; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:41:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:40:59 -0700 Message-ID: <69035570909151440i4f3c78baxfb78ba730212ba68@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop World: NYC - Speakers and Schedule Up - New: Lightning Talks at Welcome Reception! To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user , zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Fans, we're getting down to the wire for Hadoop World. We couldn't be happier with how the schedule has come together. For a full list of speakers and registration details, see http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-world-nyc - and if you plan to attend, register this week, as prices go up $100 after September 21st. We received nearly 50 submissions, and it was hard to trim this down, even after creating a 3rd track. To provide more speaking opportunities and time for the community to share their personal experiences, Cloudera engineering is hosting a welcome reception with lightning talks, an open bar, and live entertainment between talks. There will be no sales or marketing from Cloudera or anyone else, and talks are limited to 5 minutes to keep things lively. You'll find the welcome reception in the Roosevelt Grill on the main floor, just off the hotel lobby. We'll get started at 6PM on October 1st. We'll also let you pre-register for the conference so you can skip the line in the morning. At the main event, we're particularly excited to hear from Yahoo! about upcoming API enhancements and security work. The whole team over there is doing great stuff in this department, and it's features like this that will help pave the way for serious enterprise adoption of Hadoop. Facebook is also going to do a deep dive into HDFS improvements and Hive - other key features for delivering a scalable platform for a wide variety of data intensive applications. You'll also hear from leading techologists at traditional enterprises using Hadoop to solve real business problems today. Of particular note are VISA on Large Scale Transaction Analysis, IBM on Ad-hoc Web Scale Analytics, JP Morgan Chase on applications in Financial Services, Booz Allen on Protein Alignment and Amazon Web Services on Bioinformatics. These are in addition to all the usual suspects crunching big data in the web space, and demonstrate how much closer we are to the beginning of the Hadoop upswing than a plateau. These are exciting times, and we hope you can all join us. Cheers, Christophe and the Cloudera Team -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera From general-return-521-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 15 23:03:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6456 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 23:03:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 23:03:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 37852 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 23:03:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37762 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 23:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37752 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 23:03:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:03:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.16] (HELO EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:03:05 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.16]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:02:43 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:02:40 -0700 Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? Thread-Topic: hadoop scales but is not performant? Thread-Index: Aco1ohy4R0PEAxULTzSBNeEZ+4RQ7AAtoMcS Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <93d501de0909141814vaa8c9c0wc5a47ee05baae7de@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6D56B201180Bscottrichrelevancecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6D56B201180Bscottrichrelevancecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Its not entirely invalid at this scale, though the dataset generally should= be (in memory) closer to the size of the available RAM of the cluster or m= ore to be a better test. Hadoop should still do well at this size relative to a single process. If = it is taking 45 minutes on a 10 machine cluster, it should be faster than a= ny single process. If this was limited primarily by startup costs, then in= creasing the data size wouldn't almost linearly increase the time. It can probably be significantly tuned. Some tips for jobs this size: Watch the CPU / RAM / IO on a node while it is running. Is it being well u= tilized? Watch the jobs in the HTML UI on the jobtracker. Are the total number of s= lots configured being used most of the time? Or is it spending a lot of c= lock time with a lot of empty slots? If so, which slots? Are Maps or Redu= ces taking the most time? Hadoop currently is a slow scheduler for tasks (can schecule at most 1 task= per second or two per node). Using the Fair Scheduler and enabling some o= ptions can turn this up to 1 map and 1 reduce to schedule per 'tick'. Ther= e are some big changes in the schedulers due out in 0.21 that will signific= antly help here. For smaller low latency jobs this can make a big differen= ce. Hadoop also has some flaws in the shuffle phase that affect clusters of all= sizes, but can hurt small clusters with many small map jobs. Look at the= log file output of your reduce jobs (in the jobtracker UI) and see how lon= g the shuffle phase is taking. There is a big change due for 0.21 that makes this a LOT faster for some ca= ses, and low latency smaller jobs will benefit a lot too. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-318 See my comment in that ticket from the 10th of June in relation to shuffle = times. A one line change in 0.19.x and 0.20.x cut times on smaller low lat= ency jobs on smaller clusters in half when limited by shuffle inefficiencie= s (specifically, fetching no more than one map output from one host every f= ew seconds for no good reason). Tuning several hadoop parameters might help a great deal as well. Clouder= a's configuration wizard is a good starting point to help you find which kn= obs are more important. You probably also want to do some work to figure out what is taking time on= your local tests. There might be something wrong there. It seems suspici= ous to me, even at the one document size, that it would take 2 + minutes ve= rsus less than one second. Startup costs aren't that big for 2 maps and 2 = reduces - on the order of a few seconds not minutes. A few seconds times a= few jobs is still not that much. On 9/14/09 6:14 PM, "Mat Kelcey" wrote: hi all, recently i've started playing with hadoop and my first learning experiment has surprised me i'm implementing a a text problem; trying to extract infrequent phrases using a mixture of probabilistic models. it's a bit of toy problem so the algorithm details aren't super important, though the implementation might be.... this problem ended up being represented by a dozen or so map reduce jobs of various types including some aggregate steps and some manual joins. (see the bottom of this page for details http://matpalm.com/sip/take3_markov_chains.html) i've implemented each step using ruby / streaming, the code is at http://github.com/matpalm/sip if anyone cares. i ran some tests using 10 ec2 medium cpu instance across a small 100mb's of gzipped text. for validation of the results i also reimplemented the entire algorithm as a single threaded ruby app my surprise comes from finding that the ruby implementation outperforms the 10 ec2 instances on this data size... i ran a few samples of different sizes with the graph at the bottom of http://matpalm.com/sip/part4_but_does_it_scale.html so why is this? here are my explanations in order of how confident i am... a) 100mb is peanuts and hadoop was made for 1000x this size so the test is invalid. b) there is a better representation of this problem that uses fewer map/reduce passes. c) streaming is too slow and rewriting in java (and making use of techniques like chaining mappers) would speed things up d) doing these steps, particularly the joins, in pig would be faster my next steps are to rewrite some of the steps in pig to sample the differe= nce does anyone have any high level comments on this? cheers, mat --_000_C6D56B201180Bscottrichrelevancecom_-- From general-return-522-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 00:01:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23478 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 00:01:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 00:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 82018 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 00:01:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81950 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 00:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81940 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 00:01:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:01:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:01:22 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:59:51 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:59:45 -0700 Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? Thread-Topic: hadoop scales but is not performant? Thread-Index: Aco1ohy4R0PEAxULTzSBNeEZ+4RQ7AAtoMcSAAH+XeQ= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6D5788111824scottrichrelevancecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6D5788111824scottrichrelevancecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Some more comments: How are you controlling your graph of different map reduce dependencies? D= oing this linearly will leave the cluster rather underutilized. Using Pig = or Cascading or the job control interface to schedule this all (which can s= ubmit parallel independent jobs), combined with the Fair Scheduler, will us= ually have very good results on smaller clusters in reducing overall batch = latency and increasing cluster utilization. This often allows setting the = number of reduces for each job more optimally as well. Although Pig will be a bit less performant than an optimized M/R, for tasks= like yours it can possibly go much faster with a lot less code by optimizi= ng your M/R passes, scheduling, and providing some alternate join strategie= s out of the box if used right. On 9/15/09 4:02 PM, "Scott Carey" wrote: Its not entirely invalid at this scale, though the dataset generally should= be (in memory) closer to the size of the available RAM of the cluster or m= ore to be a better test. Hadoop should still do well at this size relative to a single process. If = it is taking 45 minutes on a 10 machine cluster, it should be faster than a= ny single process. If this was limited primarily by startup costs, then in= creasing the data size wouldn't almost linearly increase the time. It can probably be significantly tuned. Some tips for jobs this size: Watch the CPU / RAM / IO on a node while it is running. Is it being well u= tilized? Watch the jobs in the HTML UI on the jobtracker. Are the total number of s= lots configured being used most of the time? Or is it spending a lot of c= lock time with a lot of empty slots? If so, which slots? Are Maps or Redu= ces taking the most time? Hadoop currently is a slow scheduler for tasks (can schecule at most 1 task= per second or two per node). Using the Fair Scheduler and enabling some o= ptions can turn this up to 1 map and 1 reduce to schedule per 'tick'. Ther= e are some big changes in the schedulers due out in 0.21 that will signific= antly help here. For smaller low latency jobs this can make a big differen= ce. Hadoop also has some flaws in the shuffle phase that affect clusters of all= sizes, but can hurt small clusters with many small map jobs. Look at the= log file output of your reduce jobs (in the jobtracker UI) and see how lon= g the shuffle phase is taking. There is a big change due for 0.21 that makes this a LOT faster for some ca= ses, and low latency smaller jobs will benefit a lot too. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-318 See my comment in that ticket from the 10th of June in relation to shuffle = times. A one line change in 0.19.x and 0.20.x cut times on smaller low lat= ency jobs on smaller clusters in half when limited by shuffle inefficiencie= s (specifically, fetching no more than one map output from one host every f= ew seconds for no good reason). Tuning several hadoop parameters might help a great deal as well. Clouder= a's configuration wizard is a good starting point to help you find which kn= obs are more important. You probably also want to do some work to figure out what is taking time on= your local tests. There might be something wrong there. It seems suspici= ous to me, even at the one document size, that it would take 2 + minutes ve= rsus less than one second. Startup costs aren't that big for 2 maps and 2 = reduces - on the order of a few seconds not minutes. A few seconds times a= few jobs is still not that much. On 9/14/09 6:14 PM, "Mat Kelcey" wrote: hi all, recently i've started playing with hadoop and my first learning experiment has surprised me i'm implementing a a text problem; trying to extract infrequent phrases using a mixture of probabilistic models. it's a bit of toy problem so the algorithm details aren't super important, though the implementation might be.... this problem ended up being represented by a dozen or so map reduce jobs of various types including some aggregate steps and some manual joins. (see the bottom of this page for details http://matpalm.com/sip/take3_markov_chains.html) i've implemented each step using ruby / streaming, the code is at http://github.com/matpalm/sip if anyone cares. i ran some tests using 10 ec2 medium cpu instance across a small 100mb's of gzipped text. for validation of the results i also reimplemented the entire algorithm as a single threaded ruby app my surprise comes from finding that the ruby implementation outperforms the 10 ec2 instances on this data size... i ran a few samples of different sizes with the graph at the bottom of http://matpalm.com/sip/part4_but_does_it_scale.html so why is this? here are my explanations in order of how confident i am... a) 100mb is peanuts and hadoop was made for 1000x this size so the test is invalid. b) there is a better representation of this problem that uses fewer map/reduce passes. c) streaming is too slow and rewriting in java (and making use of techniques like chaining mappers) would speed things up d) doing these steps, particularly the joins, in pig would be faster my next steps are to rewrite some of the steps in pig to sample the differe= nce does anyone have any high level comments on this? cheers, mat --_000_C6D5788111824scottrichrelevancecom_-- From general-return-523-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 02:11:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55500 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 02:11:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 02:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68138 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 02:11:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68090 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 02:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68080 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 02:11:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:11:00 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1364153qwb.35 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:10:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: edward@udanax.org Received: by 10.224.58.15 with SMTP id e15mr6773757qah.221.1253067037452; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:10:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4b2c7b610909150210q7ff32de2s664079275f89fe2a@mail.gmail.com> References: <12A8FC4D0563D1468AD23AAAED861A3EDE081D@EMAIL02.pnl.gov> <4b2c7b610909150210q7ff32de2s664079275f89fe2a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:10:37 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6931b21f6accd5c2 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, hama-dev@incubator.apache.org, Paolo Castagna , "Taylor, Ronald C" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hyunsik, I would suggest, we are to independently library-ize BSP component so that we can commonly use it for an bulk-synchronous algorithms in a matrix computational package, and development of BSP based graph computing framework. Then, IMO, the top-level package, roughly, could be as described below: org.apache.hama.bsp org.apache.hama.matrix org.apache.hama.graph org.apache.hama.examples Let's discuss more details in the hama-dev@ and hamburg-dev@. Thanks. ;) On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > > Hi, > > As you know, graph is a very useful data model. Matrix is the great > tool to store graph data and process them. Therefore, I think that > they will give many benefits each other. I agree with your opinion. > > If we do so, how can we integrate them? What do you think about that? > > Best regards, > -- > Hyunsik Choi > Database & Information Systems Group, Korea University > http://diveintodata.org > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon w= rote: >> >> Thanks for interesting information. >> >> With hindsight, IMO, the Hama project is a best to incubate Hamburg >> project. and, we can consider again when prepare to graduate from >> incubator. >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Taylor, Ronald C wrote: >>> Hello Mr. Yoon, >>> >>> I was delighted to hear of your proposed Hamburg project. I am a new >>> user of Hadoop (and Hbase). It looks like that I will be spending a >>> substantial amount of time working in this environment over the next >>> couple years, for both DOE bioinformatics work (my primary field) and >>> for work funded by DoD. I am enthusiastic about using Hadoop, Hive, >>> Hbase. Also am quite interested in the Mahout project. >>> >>> While I cannot offer advice as to where to place your new project withi= n >>> the Apache framework, I did want to offer my support. I believe that it >>> could well be of value in the coming years both to me, for my >>> bioinformatics research, and to other researchers here at PNNL working >>> in the areas of social networks (in our national security directorate) >>> and in a set of projects directed toward making the electrical grid >>> "smarter". I would not be able to contribute any code until I found >>> funding from current or new projects for my time. But if Hamburg moves >>> forward and can demonstrate its usefulness, that might be a real >>> possibility. >>> >>> And in regards to funding for getting you some help: if you can find a >>> collaborator based at a university or non-profit, said collaborator >>> could well apply for a grant from the US National Science Foundation fo= r >>> open source Hadoop-based development of graph computing / mining >>> algorithms. The NSF Computer and Information Science and Engineering >>> Directorate is awarding grants specifically devoted to the area of grap= h >>> mining (at least this year - hopefully will continue next year - anyway= , >>> NSF gives money for algorithm and tool development in general - friendl= y >>> to that). I can't apply (at least not directly) - NSF does not like to >>> give money to other US government labs. But I would think you could fin= d >>> someone in academia - perhaps someone already working with the Mahout >>> group. It would appear a natural fit. I presume there are a number of >>> people associated with the Apache org who know something about the NSF >>> and could offer further advice in that direction. >>> >>> I look forward to hearing more about Hamburg, as it progresses. >>> >>> =C2=A0Best, >>> =C2=A0Ron Taylor >>> >>> ___________________________________________ >>> Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. >>> Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group >>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory >>> 902 Battelle Boulevard >>> P.O. Box 999, MSIN K7-90 >>> Richland, WA =C2=A099352 USA >>> Office: =C2=A0509-372-6568 >>> Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov >>> www.pnl.gov >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: edward@udanax.org [mailto:edward@udanax.org] On Behalf Of Edward >>> J. Yoon >>> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:27 PM >>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hama-dev@incubator.apache.org; >>> hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com >>> Cc: Paolo Castagna >>> Subject: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing >>> >>> Hello communities, >>> >>> I'm the one of the Hamburg (provisional name), which is the graph >>> computing framework on Hadoop sponsor. Now we're working on the >>> perfection of our prototype project, and we'll propose the Hamburg >>> project soon. >>> >>> - http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hamburg, a wiki page >>> - http://throb.googlecode.com/, a prototype project >>> >>> BTW, before we decide to propose, we need time just to consider where i= t >>> belongs to. >>> >>> Since it aims to create a "general graph computing framework" on Hadoop= , >>> I'd like to propose it as a sub-project of Hadoop. On the other hand, >>> since the matrix and graph are both in the domain of scientific >>> computing and BSP model could be used for matrix computation areas, I >>> think this project also can be integrated with the Hama project. >>> >>> WDYT? Any advices are welcome. >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. >>> edwardyoon@apache.org >>> http://blog.udanax.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. >> edwardyoon@apache.org >> http://blog.udanax.org >> > --=20 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardyoon@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org From general-return-524-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 03:38:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74359 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 03:38:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 03:38:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 15601 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 03:38:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15463 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 03:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15453 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 03:38:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matthew.kelcey@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com) (209.85.219.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:38:16 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4702939ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:37:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FtQjYUM/nWaDFHXle2KG904d1zTMmu5nGPOz2/W1DCE=; b=ow37oHlOT21wfZWS1dFCSbRnRm+Drdj+Qme1XsHpiEFI7b+Z+BSYHzZuRFR4B3exac xFhoU2nXasTejUIrnEVenZK74tkgkep9yhhIGiwZqD1+kDN7FSnqGX4tF9/2QZjnAU2q 2OhFCbD7ONaiN1Jsm++uqXS8rw5YuYcERjbpk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yw6fyiQgvyPReZhCVbHO+Qs3O9qoUhFbYwecJcjymzl3fojMkeiqDnAY06zOUKYOeb 11vQXbEoSLDsUkFoNCcXD4KLZIhdWLI2ZGgcjDNa5pfRlvlALPxGVqa1q5kZkE2Z5m+t rm0Y6DEFTvsz3S8JIruQ4g2BOEx5JL7toNKnk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.128.9 with SMTP id f9mr9217582ebn.93.1253072275607; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:37:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:37:55 +1000 Message-ID: <93d501de0909152037j4e6a53b8t4f2e972cf7783813@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? From: Mat Kelcey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org thanks scott, some great things to think about! the only "tuning" i did was to set mapred.reduce.tasks and mapred.map.tasks to 30 to correspond to the capability specified by the html ui. i admit i did this without a deep understanding what it meant, i do know that when i did not specify these then only a few mappers would be utilised (due to the same input data size) in relation to scheduling i was taking the simple approach of running the streaming jobs sequentially with the default scheduler. even from watching output scroll past it is obvious that a _lot_ of time is being taken up in setup related activities. this is most apparent in the single document case. something is just not right... i had read in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2721 "Use job control for tasks (and therefore for pipes and streaming)" that jobcontrol (specifically representing job dependencies) was not yet available for streaming. as such i dismissed any scheduling changes. i'll revisit this to make sure i understand what i can and can't do in streaming. if nothing else i can try fairscheduling with my own rolled version of dependencies. i'm orchestrating the job runs from rake and i've got my own homebrew libraries for this type of dependency management, though i'm also loath to roll my own versions of things. so lots of ideas and things to check, i'll rerun trying some of the things you've mentioned. thanks again for the feedback! mat From general-return-525-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 03:41:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74764 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 03:41:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 03:41:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 03:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16470 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 03:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16460 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 03:41:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:41:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matthew.kelcey@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com) (209.85.219.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:41:05 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so4704173ewy.36 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bgWv35SkaiucEFU3JI7sQD6AaDq2OqFdQN7xkph+X9U=; b=efLy6CnwHwFQgrf78ayxXbAqlnbO2ZOabJ3vlGeOLhmut5SQz2G25mJe2HMGIa0/dB Lc/DGoc3h1ZJgbvwW/RoVRtxjt13QDR1SdIUcBriYqUyk7WPjPyQ9cmrNmzoO7zimrpw BOro0ybkQtnmz+4lauXr1qCePAqqM2ya3wWd0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BSDcqhEcZUALkxbIwORxCcXHrz6tZwSKEab/py3NIo9CFkzCUV7t+jG1MYaCpBoItY BJXi7dsK/HDrz34Fwr1VSgdXvg6MWXlea8UgEEOYVnVz6/hTNxIK8aqNjLZYjsPMoIXc WNEtIIau3KkR+NvJADj/AjWZqxN3RXtGrVPLk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.129.8 with SMTP id g8mr9302657ebn.71.1253072444645; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:40:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <93d501de0909152037j4e6a53b8t4f2e972cf7783813@mail.gmail.com> References: <93d501de0909152037j4e6a53b8t4f2e972cf7783813@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:40:44 +1000 Message-ID: <93d501de0909152040w1de486bw55a8138709d452e0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop scales but is not performant? From: Mat Kelcey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > mappers would be utilised (due to the same input data size) whoops, i mean "small input data size" From general-return-526-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 17:51:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28962 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 17:51:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 17:51:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 63326 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 17:51:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63251 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 17:51:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63241 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 17:51:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.48] (HELO QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:27 +0000 Received: from OMTA17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hUz81c0041afHeLA5Vr6nG; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:06 +0000 Received: from wlan-guest-112.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.144]) by OMTA17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hVqw1c00336jmhM8dVqyGr; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop Core 0.20.1 is released Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:50:54 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Core 0.20.1 has been released and the website is now published. Get them while they are hot! Hadoop 0.20.1 is now considered the stable release and is recommended for new installations. There are a lot of important fixes that have been made over 0.20.0. Download the new release from: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/core/ The list of bug fixes that were addressed in the release are: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/releasenotes.html -- Owen From general-return-527-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 16 18:08:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36131 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2009 18:08:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2009 18:08:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 88013 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 18:08:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87931 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2009 18:08:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87921 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2009 18:08:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:08:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.218] (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.220.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:08:25 +0000 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so3872954fxm.29 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TtIMgGhh4TbN38eD06eTPRXneNGz1ZO4D4I6Kzh1Kts=; b=WdFre/ND/J34nylao92OH4tRj+lpTVfOqW36FcgC2eEmFpJ/LZfwsaBNo7Z9ASpcrI bBxn7CgwzPEbBAyznHEIh31P5JH+H+t08GisIAKqXgxD9uxRXD6lCgKu0h3GM5Yi1L5+ cRbefWuJavFpqMabh06i50U3j+qhv7+58wXeY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RkeQgLOg/cFpliNy/PSPdtpqI/5VDVmT1gN38jZBzZSbr2v6MEH75i8svCm6hg7A65 fBrfc9SF4tJkf6kIcssFXhL2A34bvSVWJj/Qv6nQhDvNcfzgV04KhOZUEcC60Br5QEJ+ a2gyVTFwcoP3hn5vLrvesMclcBZG6tleUeT2M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.76.12 with SMTP id d12mr3978487mul.25.1253124485693; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:08:05 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00909161108t4de1bf2fvd771ae76cdff3bbd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Question about Eclipse plugin 0.18.0 and latest stable release 0.20.1 From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b611cd441540473b5c766 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65b611cd441540473b5c766 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all! 20 minutes ago, the latest stable version of Hadoop core has been released, and that made me think about a clean reinstallation of my old Hadoop 0.18.0 core (running in a VMWare image). The question is that I access to that cor= e through the Eclipse plugin (in its 0.18.1 version) and if I "upgrade" the HDFS to this latest version, how would the plugin for Eclipse work?. I=B4d like to know if anyone upgraded the core, but left the old plugin working a= s usual (or with some workaround)... Thanks a lot. --=20 Alberto --0016e65b611cd441540473b5c766-- From general-return-528-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Sep 17 21:08:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84098 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 21:08:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 21:08:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 74976 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 21:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74917 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 21:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74900 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2009 21:08:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:08:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.35] (HELO web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:08:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 93979 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Sep 2009 21:08:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1253221685; bh=9sJDHh5f4YP8Eq5Jo07KwO3ARUQao6gMKU9VMZKh9EE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IY8S2f7bIuk2LCPQtVWyxQzBz2JVvPuZVakJOj2a2A4JqK118UWurGyKHiek9PxDbJb9F5govQnRF6xLl2yLbqPogolPDv7EG4BXEFvw6OfVZHjOBgpfXe2gOfFvpRnlrtdeUJ2Mgdt4lVMFS+2qUnXFGTjSMDpFoM8m8zzKKNw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZSF8vBSo3P6pm5HvXbdJSx8fkyxi0meDoEWJOqG+FGAG6qlRr6ya0aPVAP743UnJYVMpprY/QAc3yrKXFekSmCMYTlADdJR9ajyK8jTZrtxFCjQE9oRb/79Eh0njMBf7QrE3IQMW5RxnZUHO0g+rjUjH1+xBUqGFtZQjOaOym+I=; Message-ID: <904767.92694.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2sT5kSIVM1n9IlnBgBx2GU_xfPPdV9fkYxCZrm29KXKdEGXmEIrl5YvtkYBt7hiIVGnWFsmAJ93IKHxXUocHR4_JZTmX_v3TnlcHJdhH26nNORDz3eyuyda7Noegyv7d4n7IyPkaX_OryUNiv9mUeRHeHV5EtgdX..ntlEodtZ2mPYFSo83ThiAdUin.QyVriUjNTi8xAXvnUq4oQ9a0yXX9yg575E05t5pE7AUnleK_ReJjvmXTz9wmQiqfenm7fnvOOcROC2yYMWJ9ttqxQGOCWGRfuTPn1XfALg931Ity7sQaxePOFi17KFmUI2XaBgQ7ejspvbf0hi7pYUn155wqgZuGaoEiMhT_Jp6ihpLfCVc0_dPHt2VXl0buyQboXtm47EYMA5VPhm70ykTep4zD Received: from [129.170.212.235] by web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:08:05 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:08:05 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: hadoop hangs on reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Has anyone seen hadoop getting stuck on reduces? I'm using a compiled version of hadoop from cloudera: Hadoop 0.18.3-14.cloudera.CH0_3 Subversion -r HEAD Compiled by root on Mon Jul 6 15:02:31 EDT 2009 I've a map reduce job and hadoop gets stuck at 96.49% with no progress since the last 1 hour. I've tried to look into the logs and there isn't anything interesting there. Here's the log from the last 1 hour: >>>> 2009-09-17 14:51:47,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.42.1.1:50010, storageID=DS-1052225239-129.170.192.42-50010-1252112893659, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 480000 millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for write. ch : java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.42.1.1:50010 remote=/10.42.255.247:41915] at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.waitForIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:246) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.waitForWritable(SocketOutputStream.java:159) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.transferToFully(SocketOutputStream.java:198) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$BlockSender.sendChunks(DataNode.java:1938) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$BlockSender.sendBlock(DataNode.java:2032) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.readBlock(DataNode.java:1159) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.run(DataNode.java:1087) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2009-09-17 14:52:29,916 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 7 msecs 2009-09-17 15:15:06,586 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_4472685249728744796_2145 2009-09-17 15:52:28,686 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 8 msecs 2009-09-17 16:52:30,397 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 8 msecs >>>> while the hadoop reduce is stuck at 96.49 for the last 1 hr: 09/09/17 15:49:49 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 96% This is the second time I've tried to run this code and both of the times I've seen it hitting a barrier on reduce. My reduce step is just aggregating all of the keys and dumping them into files using MultipleTextOutputFormat. I've run a problem of similar size before where the input to reduce was of the same size as this one. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I can't seem to find any reason why this is happening. Thanks Himanshu Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-529-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 18 03:51:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92280 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11106 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11009 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80318 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 09:11:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of c0d3h4ck@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rAFWTxBueXT1iJNI7czdWCWD6I2tqSCjBvYJHMTZMyQ=; b=CpIf1cSGCEhAJo6m3PR30cbtGl3+w2nS7+ulWui359gnGpKYKANvfK073W2j6nLHJ3 O8+C4HP2oCrvlBqtEoTXmtWUkPqMYtikVnQGrOrccktKM5JtiOGJnJKqVkRQwBqqSLAZ UwkxAueahKxDC7LSey0fWU3sKZGrRX+il8DYc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dPzrpbUXAJydNZlp+XlL+IoySaFzl30oqH6ft8gdee38G3pX+aU5x2ABSWKzmzYvT+ G2MEq6PS11yVYzf+c584EHpR2QVPGbRDbfqkIPnKb30c7AgrWFDg3TWVe+HL3dnOgDXV gubyQt2tF4hhmOXGJKudnI/vzJsDgGGcgolJE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <12A8FC4D0563D1468AD23AAAED861A3EDE081D@EMAIL02.pnl.gov> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:10:19 +0900 Message-ID: <4b2c7b610909150210q7ff32de2s664079275f89fe2a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing From: Hyunsik Choi To: hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, hama-dev@incubator.apache.org, Paolo Castagna , "Taylor, Ronald C" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, As you know, graph is a very useful data model. Matrix is the great tool to store graph data and process them. Therefore, I think that they will give many benefits each other. I agree with your opinion. If we do so, how can we integrate them? What do you think about that? Best regards, -- Hyunsik Choi Database & Information Systems Group, Korea University http://diveintodata.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon wro= te: > > Thanks for interesting information. > > With hindsight, IMO, the Hama project is a best to incubate Hamburg > project. and, we can consider again when prepare to graduate from > incubator. > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Taylor, Ronald C = wrote: >> Hello Mr. Yoon, >> >> I was delighted to hear of your proposed Hamburg project. I am a new >> user of Hadoop (and Hbase). It looks like that I will be spending a >> substantial amount of time working in this environment over the next >> couple years, for both DOE bioinformatics work (my primary field) and >> for work funded by DoD. I am enthusiastic about using Hadoop, Hive, >> Hbase. Also am quite interested in the Mahout project. >> >> While I cannot offer advice as to where to place your new project within >> the Apache framework, I did want to offer my support. I believe that it >> could well be of value in the coming years both to me, for my >> bioinformatics research, and to other researchers here at PNNL working >> in the areas of social networks (in our national security directorate) >> and in a set of projects directed toward making the electrical grid >> "smarter". I would not be able to contribute any code until I found >> funding from current or new projects for my time. But if Hamburg moves >> forward and can demonstrate its usefulness, that might be a real >> possibility. >> >> And in regards to funding for getting you some help: if you can find a >> collaborator based at a university or non-profit, said collaborator >> could well apply for a grant from the US National Science Foundation for >> open source Hadoop-based development of graph computing / mining >> algorithms. The NSF Computer and Information Science and Engineering >> Directorate is awarding grants specifically devoted to the area of graph >> mining (at least this year - hopefully will continue next year - anyway, >> NSF gives money for algorithm and tool development in general - friendly >> to that). I can't apply (at least not directly) - NSF does not like to >> give money to other US government labs. But I would think you could find >> someone in academia - perhaps someone already working with the Mahout >> group. It would appear a natural fit. I presume there are a number of >> people associated with the Apache org who know something about the NSF >> and could offer further advice in that direction. >> >> I look forward to hearing more about Hamburg, as it progresses. >> >> =A0Best, >> =A0Ron Taylor >> >> ___________________________________________ >> Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. >> Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group >> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory >> 902 Battelle Boulevard >> P.O. Box 999, MSIN K7-90 >> Richland, WA =A099352 USA >> Office: =A0509-372-6568 >> Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov >> www.pnl.gov >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: edward@udanax.org [mailto:edward@udanax.org] On Behalf Of Edward >> J. Yoon >> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:27 PM >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hama-dev@incubator.apache.org; >> hamburg-dev@googlegroups.com >> Cc: Paolo Castagna >> Subject: Discussion about Hamburg (provisional name) open sourcing >> >> Hello communities, >> >> I'm the one of the Hamburg (provisional name), which is the graph >> computing framework on Hadoop sponsor. Now we're working on the >> perfection of our prototype project, and we'll propose the Hamburg >> project soon. >> >> - http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hamburg, a wiki page >> - http://throb.googlecode.com/, a prototype project >> >> BTW, before we decide to propose, we need time just to consider where it >> belongs to. >> >> Since it aims to create a "general graph computing framework" on Hadoop, >> I'd like to propose it as a sub-project of Hadoop. On the other hand, >> since the matrix and graph are both in the domain of scientific >> computing and BSP model could be used for matrix computation areas, I >> think this project also can be integrated with the Hama project. >> >> WDYT? Any advices are welcome. >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. >> edwardyoon@apache.org >> http://blog.udanax.org >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. > edwardyoon@apache.org > http://blog.udanax.org > From general-return-530-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 18 18:35:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82798 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 18:35:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2009 18:35:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 73651 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73566 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73555 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2009 18:35:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:35:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.125.36] (HELO web38405.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.125.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:34:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 12267 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Sep 2009 18:34:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1253298874; bh=60ed4Ds68Mj2XZ8ZLO7sphamlvxRbkuHDyQCj8TMJ48=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JpxguBpY8YESBOjmjK8/aheEq/SnaA1eZQtDPsSwtiItbfTh1MZxsVcHes8y2W1OjMHPEVrUAPLPYdAppV760HTo0Px+1CBc5Dzz7ADWj5QX2mkdQM0N5VOfu2pHVU16T9d6bB+dwMh2/cQOmJnn/sNyvctQx9yjbPD70muwMqA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VwxfQBYxOfkT6P+M0U6Hvnazodf1VeSHVHmWz2AYtDHLHJZAtbckYUp7TTJPlWZ1DJjl4SUGLlWH32XhB7IAoGXWLZzt2qU32lCpPhDojlB8PRHrHi2/mJBFg8wCBPBoi1ripZxXPzQHTJg/aoIa+CJJkmX7Hucx4KIROhCs7rw=; Message-ID: <232426.10791.qm@web38405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: t6L1P04VM1lX_O5.XrxxJpx6vPn1VuLqOu3zZJCyAYMcvFwr1Ye5RMh0EXHj7ZCPLKL0VCa9rVTi5rEpEj5N_pTJ3ebeJpZ7Vh861ZZWcvxhq4kAcOrDQaPVuUNdheu9X2U68aAYytCpUksSjgcI60jugcpU6mgwail7PhjzoFNRfFDmnWwFCm4LflYRKZeGZhJFP62vSSzlF1JqKAMIFuw_TM0MxI7nc..AHvtm4OgpMVQ7YQL4IkjaeeYmsG_pNAZV6qX8hmcQ8dS1WX6UnjE3tZ4ySr4dBJMrQcKnqSeyX.zIq3qz1JzOWiFKhrY5zdYm8Td9OxujVVNZmk6gxlIBEy5Y0ddPYTZx8VXKBTR37IS0nzix9Xt9FgSHmfStcOmVZYM- Received: from [129.170.212.235] by web38405.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 References: <904767.92694.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT) From: himanshu chandola Subject: Re: hadoop hangs on reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <904767.92694.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just as an update. I made a dummy map job so that the map outputs a unique key for every input and hence the input to reduce is unique too. Still my reduce jobs hang at 76.02 % now (I've added a few nodes into my cluster so I suspect what was earlier 96.49 is 76.02). So this is definitely not a memory or io issue. Do I restart my task trackers ? (ive tried once but didnt help) thanks Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. ----- Original Message ---- From: himanshu chandola To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:08:05 PM Subject: hadoop hangs on reduce Hi, Has anyone seen hadoop getting stuck on reduces? I'm using a compiled version of hadoop from cloudera: Hadoop 0.18.3-14.cloudera.CH0_3 Subversion -r HEAD Compiled by root on Mon Jul 6 15:02:31 EDT 2009 I've a map reduce job and hadoop gets stuck at 96.49% with no progress since the last 1 hour. I've tried to look into the logs and there isn't anything interesting there. Here's the log from the last 1 hour: >>>> 2009-09-17 14:51:47,033 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.42.1.1:50010, storageID=DS-1052225239-129.170.192.42-50010-1252112893659, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 480000 millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for write. ch : java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.42.1.1:50010 remote=/10.42.255.247:41915] at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.waitForIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:246) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.waitForWritable(SocketOutputStream.java:159) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketOutputStream.transferToFully(SocketOutputStream.java:198) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$BlockSender.sendChunks(DataNode.java:1938) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$BlockSender.sendBlock(DataNode.java:2032) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.readBlock(DataNode.java:1159) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.run(DataNode.java:1087) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2009-09-17 14:52:29,916 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 7 msecs 2009-09-17 15:15:06,586 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_4472685249728744796_2145 2009-09-17 15:52:28,686 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 8 msecs 2009-09-17 16:52:30,397 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: BlockReport of 40 blocks got processed in 8 msecs >>>> while the hadoop reduce is stuck at 96.49 for the last 1 hr: 09/09/17 15:49:49 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 96% This is the second time I've tried to run this code and both of the times I've seen it hitting a barrier on reduce. My reduce step is just aggregating all of the keys and dumping them into files using MultipleTextOutputFormat. I've run a problem of similar size before where the input to reduce was of the same size as this one. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I can't seem to find any reason why this is happening. Thanks Himanshu Morpheus: Do you believe in fate, Neo? Neo: No. Morpheus: Why Not? Neo: Because I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life. From general-return-531-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 21 10:10:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91844 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2009 10:10:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2009 10:10:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 82773 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2009 10:10:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82686 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2009 10:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82676 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2009 10:10:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDB7B7CD1 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id A4Hv+x6LImDF for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF78B7CCF for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:53 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1254132580.76735@ZTxUz5Q6IUlaVMRp/KAQgg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n8LA9eHH008689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:40 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4AB750E4.70300@apache.org> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:40 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: hadoop hangs on reduce References: <904767.92694.qm@web38404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <232426.10791.qm@web38405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <232426.10791.qm@web38405.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n8LA9eHH008689 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org himanshu chandola wrote: > Just as an update. I made a dummy map job so that the map outputs a unique key for every input and hence the input to reduce is unique too. Still my reduce jobs hang at 76.02 % now (I've added a few nodes into my cluster so I suspect what was earlier 96.49 is 76.02). So this is definitely not a memory or io issue. > > Do I restart my task trackers ? (ive tried once but didnt help) > I see reduce hangs when the TT's cant talk to each other, when they can't get data from the other TTs check the value of mapred.task.tracker.report.address , that it is on an external address (not 127.0.0.1) and that the port in use is open on all the machines. -steve From general-return-532-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 22 23:22:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68106 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2009 23:22:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2009 23:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20560 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2009 23:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20512 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2009 23:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20502 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2009 23:22:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:22:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.214] (HELO mail-bw0-f214.google.com) (209.85.218.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:22:01 +0000 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so178101bwz.29 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:21:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=KS4QdGaioB8NQYWiPSSTT7mCgEt9WkpBS3muKA17Sp4=; b=vodjWrP+pTzL7ob3SYH0aaEHYLMowrg94xttRPWx/75w6H9ycFEjEpfKxImN0LqbZZ FgmdGCVwkAW0JSj9rekYUI55gWTKqgFtEf6sUhg2aiPSXzZa9cMd1HgJaDTXoolWr6M8 lBGDKP8QGgrTLyPbzA/zcsyh5z0pY8zl+ELpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=b1motqY3q6G1KFgyOTXdo5xh772a6RHH435LotKMaxR6REFXMq5L8pi+1kDWHDQgAF k4j4KvEqqV1YT3afbakc3Vhct4uTGhJWwg9vZHZ6IkbHcdtoHUEifArIkkdKevvMb8IL Wp66/2nFxF0nV9yHrbD6t6t2ulifnrK3Dc42U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.211.35 with SMTP id j35mr686076mug.35.1253661700993; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:21:40 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00909221621x603129dch2c026b61c7373dde@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Question about remote execution with Hadoop From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641781f5b34d2047432dcee X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163641781f5b34d2047432dcee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! I=B4m actually working on a project involving Map-Reduce and genetics algorithms (with an iterative approach). I=B4m developing this project with Eclipse 3.5 (with PigPen and Hadoop 0.18.1 plugins integrated). There=B4s a class called "Client" which is actually the entry point to the MapReduce Runtime System (user data introduction, etc). There=B4s also a "MRPGAMaster= " file, which works as the Driver for the Hadoop framework. In this class there=B4s a "main" method where I declare the job to submit to Map-Reduce (= as usual) so as the Mapper, Reducer, etc, but I=B4m having problems finding a = way to call this "main" method from the "main" method in the "Client" class. I=B4ve tried this: MRPGAMaster master =3D new MRPGAMaster(); master.main(); but the job in MRPGAMaster is executed locally and not in the HDFS (which i= s running in a Virtual Machine). What I=B4m trying to do is possible? Does anyone have any idea?. Thanks a lot! --=20 Alberto --00163641781f5b34d2047432dcee-- From general-return-533-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Sep 25 08:14:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83727 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2009 08:14:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2009 08:14:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 81697 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2009 08:14:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81622 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2009 08:14:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81612 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2009 08:14:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:14:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:14:11 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so3008105ywh.5 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.144.10 with SMTP id r10mr580030agd.70.1253866427646; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nsf264fa356e37 ([202.51.92.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1303109agc.47.2009.09.25.01.13.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:13:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chandan Tamrakar" To: Subject: Integrating Lucene in Hadoop Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:58:41 +0545 Message-ID: <4abc7bbb.05035a0a.55c7.ffffd84c@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0030_01CA3DE8.4C675D70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Aco9uBewVT+JU953TmSoQkzEl1fo6Q== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01CA3DE8.4C675D70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was doing few R&D on integrating hadoop and Lucene . I could create lucene indexes into HDFS using index contribution provided for Hadoop Is this a proper way to create Lucene index how much it is different from a project KATTA ? Please suggest what would be the better approach to create distributed lucene indexes Thanks in advance ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01CA3DE8.4C675D70-- From general-return-534-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Sep 26 00:37:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81938 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2009 00:37:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2009 00:37:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 18066 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2009 00:37:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17977 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2009 00:37:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17967 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2009 00:37:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:37:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.19] (HELO EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:36:57 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.19]) with mapi; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:36:35 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:36:25 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcozKK1fBLyodrspRxSIuJsYqlOv9QLGLNZL Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6E2B019127CCscottrichrelevancecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6E2B019127CCscottrichrelevancecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, I have some thoughts on this. I might be misinterpreting some use case= s here however. HTTP is very useful and typically performs very well. It has lots of thing= s built-in too. In addition to what you mention, it has a caching mechani= sm built-in, range queries, and all sorts of ways to tag along state if nee= ded. To top it off there are a lot of testing and debugging tools availabl= e for it. So from that front using it is very attractive. However, In my experience zero-copy is not going to be much of a gain perfo= rmance-wise for this sort of application, and will limit what can be done. = As long as a servlet doesn't transcode data and mostly copies, it will be = very fast - many multiples of gigabit ethernet speed per CPU - far more tha= n most disk setups will handle for a while. Furthermore, it is easier to o= ptimize disk requests to be 'sequentially chunky' if it goes through the JV= M. And I suspect that for many use cases, optimizing disk I/O is more valu= able than a little bit of extra CPU spent copying data into and out of the = process. Additionally, I'm not sure CRC checking should occur on the client. TCP/IP= already checksums packets, so network data corruption over HTTP is not a p= rimary concern. The big concern is silent data corruption on the disk. F= or the DataNode use case, it should find such errors as early as possible, = and not rely on clients discovering errors. Then it can coordinate with th= e NameNode on fixing the block or discarding it. So if it has to check the= file integrity anyway, there is no reason to worry about zero-copy. Avoid= ing the extra request for the CRC data at least partially counters the loss= of zero-copy. Additionally, embedding Tomcat tends to be more tricky than Jetty, though t= hat can be overcome. One might argue that we don't even want a servlet con= tainer, we just want an HTTP connector. The Servlet API is familiar, but f= or a high performance transport it might just be overhead and restrictive. = Direct access to Tomcat's NIO connector might be significantly lighter-wei= ght and more flexible. Tomcat's NIO connector implementation works great and I have had great succ= ess with up to 10K connections with the pure Java connector using ordinary = byte buffers and about 20 servlet threads. But if a large number of open c= onnections are not needed (less than about 5x the number of CPU core thread= s) then thread-per-connection servlet containers work ok too. These sort o= f implementation details can evolve over time however. Just my 2c -Scott On 9/11/09 2:41 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: I'm considering an HTTP-based transport for Avro as the preferred, high-performance option. HTTP has lots of advantages. In particular, it already has - lots of authentication, authorization and encryption support; - highly optimized servers; - monitoring, logging, etc. Tomcat and other servlet containers support async NIO, where a thread is not required per connection. A servlet can process bulk data with a single copy to and from the socket (bypassing stream buffers). Calls can be multiplexed over a single HTTP connection using Comet events. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/aio.html Zero copy is not an option for servlets that generate arbitrary data, but one can specify a file/start/length tuple and Tomcat will use sendfile to write the response. That means that while HDFS datanode file reads could not be done via RPC, they could be done via HTTP with zero-copy. If authentication and authorization are already done in the HTTP server, this may not be a big loss. The HDFS client might make two HTTP requests, one to read a files data, and another to read its checksums. The server would then stream the entire block to the client using sendfile, using TCP flow control as today. Thoughts? Doug --_000_C6E2B019127CCscottrichrelevancecom_-- From general-return-535-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 04:30:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25481 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 04:30:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 04:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 60783 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 04:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60688 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 04:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60678 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 04:30:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:30:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.186] (HELO mail-vw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.212.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:30:35 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so2764439vws.2 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:30:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1TFhVdpQ2gfU7AvDMBs/yK+xCXuUMmAbUQtwu3qJCTw=; b=EaQ0WkSViSJX9E23QaRrxnETWqc1y0hDtHsdN/mWXy4xFXkKJ2IwLLIPQHQr5qX5Im rSQwnGT1Gfg+hpsPRi8YP7XihEg1jkyAARPbBQaTu5Go0bBTTbs1tezXm1WHk6yrgiwz FSRCIKhZJhXlG7tImQ7RsC/VJlsgTRcWwzBic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cQotK9z7F3bmLBEoj3EC/aKTbrAofYJZ/zJ0CEyckvKgTTTI5Ellx+3j9YJ8S/tDVA Xg5VmllJTloxwXIsdZsp9e+v8JLY11gDBRG5pz3SkvI7ZBZ/zHk8qgSeafHbhzre/Kvh 8dC3vx6jmCdyV9V4caCsCSUMMMFk/noE2XiRg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.11.9 with SMTP id r9mr5067241vcr.58.1254112213723; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:30:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4abc7bbb.05035a0a.55c7.ffffd84c@mx.google.com> References: <4abc7bbb.05035a0a.55c7.ffffd84c@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:30:13 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690909272130n4f22e636re90a067e47caffa2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Integrating Lucene in Hadoop From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e7ca2001eaa304749bc1b9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485e7ca2001eaa304749bc1b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Katta is a tool for managing distributed search, which happens by default to use lucene as it' search engine. Katta is able to read indexes from hdfs, or s3, that katta then deploys onto the local disk of the katta nodes. The contrib directory of the hadoop installation contains a tool for building lucene indexes, and patch solr-1395, provides an integration of solr with katta, and patch solr-1301 provides a simple way of building solr indexes in hadoop (as a parallel to the contrib lucene index build tool). On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > I was doing few R&D on integrating hadoop and Lucene . I could create > lucene indexes into HDFS using index contribution provided for Hadoop > > > > Is this a proper way to create Lucene index how much it is different from a > project KATTA ? > > > > Please suggest what would be the better approach to create distributed > lucene indexes > > > > Thanks in advance > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --001485e7ca2001eaa304749bc1b9-- From general-return-536-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 14:36:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75288 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 14:36:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 14:36:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27859 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 14:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27761 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 14:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27751 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 14:36:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:36:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.222] (HELO mail-fx0-f222.google.com) (209.85.220.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:35:53 +0000 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so36807fxm.36 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dDcpDeH1x4wBc8+o5ia3CeoR4GHC3+OqwhiaVa6YLco=; b=tKXsPGOsc+ZCWw0EUbnPdL7krPa+Ho3ADwldiMT6O25F1EvykrmdWBmU9GQ8s22/Ii aQg32geTeIDvO3+X3btAxd3c6cTZMYPg3W0UX1yssMReIrMe30wDIygLChdt3xTXjvvD jIdXaVDX4zZuj8sNN6EsA7bt4i8UtBBtoRYEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OfG40bQG3kKxDyq4Rvxbu8VkQ55BQ6AmWZc2SMMGUrvdZr1V/8eDEIhyIehL4jbM2A U8X5/10fsjXrnE4vt+gYdSpmr10XaysSmbwvCDz/vrQBZ1wdTbDOS+8QZB2B3L1QqSag 4x2uJySRX/rMm/LJQ3ylmZy3RhAJSVDVElJBQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.122.5 with SMTP id z5mr1292237mum.11.1254148533304; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:35:33 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00909280735m5f23442bvf699256b343f085f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: ECLIPSE PLUGIN FOR HADOOP 0.20.1 From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659faeed2bd260474a435d9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e659faeed2bd260474a435d9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone! Does anyone managed to generate the Eclipse plugin JAR file with the latest Hadoop stable version (0.20.1) under Windows? Could anyone help me? Thanks in advance. -- Alberto --0016e659faeed2bd260474a435d9-- From general-return-537-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 17:01:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22230 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 17:01:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 17:01:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16023 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 17:01:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15943 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 17:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15933 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 17:01:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:01:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:01:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 21139 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 17:01:18 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:01:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC0EBDD.9070207@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:01:17 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott Carey wrote: > HTTP is very useful and typically performs very well. It has lots of > things built-in too. In addition to what you mention, it has a > caching mechanism built-in, range queries, and all sorts of ways to > tag along state if needed. To top it off there are a lot of testing > and debugging tools available for it. So from that front using it is > very attractive. Glad you agree! > However, In my experience zero-copy is not going to be much of a gain > performance-wise for this sort of application, and will limit what > can be done. As long as a servlet doesn't transcode data and mostly > copies, it will be very fast - many multiples of gigabit ethernet > speed per CPU - far more than most disk setups will handle for a > while. In MapReduce, datanodes are also running map and reduce tasks, so we'd like it if datanodes not only keep up with disks and networks, but also use minimal CPU to do so. Zerocopy on the datanode has been shown to help significantly MapReduce benchmarks. That said, zero copy may or may not be significantly better than one-copy. I intend to benchmark that. But the important thing to measure is not just throughput but also idle CPU. > Additionally, I'm not sure CRC checking should occur on the > client. TCP/IP already checksums packets, so network data corruption > over HTTP is not a primary concern. The big concern is silent data > corruption on the disk. I believe that disks are the largest source of data corruption, but I am not confident they are the only source. HDFS uses end-to-end checksums. As data is written to HDFS it is immediately checksummed on the client. This checksum then lives with the data and is validated on the client immediately before the data is returned to the application. The goal is to catch corruption wherever it may occur, on disks, on the network, or while buffered in memory. In addition, the checksum is validated after data is transmitted to datanodes but before before blocks are stored, so that initial network and memory corruptions are caught early and the writing process fails, rather than permitting an application to write corrupt data. Finally, datanodes periodically scan for corrupt blocks on disks, replacing them with non-corrupt replicas, decreasing the chance that over time all replicas become corrupt. > Additionally, embedding Tomcat tends to be more tricky than Jetty, > though that can be overcome. One might argue that we don't even want > a servlet container, we just want an HTTP connector. The Servlet API > is familiar, but for a high performance transport it might just be > overhead and restrictive. Direct access to Tomcat's NIO connector > might be significantly lighter-weight and more flexible. Tomcat's NIO > connector implementation works great and I have had great success > with up to 10K connections with the pure Java connector using > ordinary byte buffers and about 20 servlet threads. I hope to start benchmarking bulk data RPC over the next few weeks. I'll probably start with a servlet using Jetty, then see if I can increase throughput and decrease CPU utilization through the use of things like Tomcat's NIO connector, Grizzly, etc. Doug From general-return-538-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 18:00:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45135 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 17:59:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 17:59:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 99467 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 17:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99423 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 17:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99345 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 17:59:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:59:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:59:47 +0000 Received: from OMTA19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by QMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mD8P1c0041eYJf8A6HzU24; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:59:28 +0000 Received: from wlan-guest-114.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.144]) by OMTA19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id mHzK1c00A36jmhM01HzMX2; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:59:25 +0000 Message-Id: <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:59:17 -0700 References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I'm considering an HTTP-based transport for Avro as the preferred, > high-performance option. I've got concerns about this. Both tactical and strategic. The tactical problem is that I need to get security (both Kerberos and token) in to 0.22. I'd really like to get Avro RPC into 0.22. I'd like both to be done roughly in 5 months. If you switch off of the current RPC code base to a completely new RPC code base, I don't see that happening. > HTTP has lots of advantages. In particular, it already has > - lots of authentication, authorization and encryption support; > - highly optimized servers; > - monitoring, logging, etc. It also has a couple of disadvantages: - poor integration with kerberos - very expensive on the wire encryption (ssl) > Tomcat and other servlet containers support async NIO, where a > thread is not required per connection. I'm also concerned about the weight of Tomcat. Everything I've read about it says that it take a lot more memory and cpu than Jetty. I think a solution that requires Tomcat may be problematic... -- Owen From general-return-539-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 20:14:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95734 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 20:14:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 20:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 12104 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 20:14:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12026 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 20:14:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12016 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 20:14:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:14:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:14:27 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n8SKD42o001720 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=yFWMrq/7IUlyqH+eKsPNrVGcYXZTWKD+Hf4YqY7QydmSuyr9UKICLBGE4Wo50Ilr Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-36-983677215 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:13:04 -0700 References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-36-983677215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sep 11, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I'm considering an HTTP-based transport for Avro as the preferred, > high-performance option. > > HTTP has lots of advantages. In particular, it already has > - lots of authentication, authorization and encryption support; > - highly optimized servers; > - monitoring, logging, etc. > Q. Is this to replace the client-DN data-transfer protocol or for ALL Hadoop rpc? Q. Was authentication one of your main motivation? The current plans for authentication is centered around kerberos. HTTP does not fit in too well in that picture. sanjay > > Tomcat and other servlet containers support async NIO, where a > thread is > not required per connection. A servlet can process bulk data with a > single copy to and from the socket (bypassing stream buffers). Calls > can be multiplexed over a single HTTP connection using Comet events. > > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/aio.html > > Zero copy is not an option for servlets that generate arbitrary data, > but one can specify a file/start/length tuple and Tomcat will use > sendfile to write the response. That means that while HDFS datanode > file reads could not be done via RPC, they could be done via HTTP with > zero-copy. If authentication and authorization are already done in > the > HTTP server, this may not be a big loss. The HDFS client might make > two > HTTP requests, one to read a files data, and another to read its > checksums. The server would then stream the entire block to the > client > using sendfile, using TCP flow control as today. > > Thoughts? > > Doug > --Apple-Mail-36-983677215-- From general-return-540-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 22:31:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35456 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 69525 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69453 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69443 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com designates 167.1.158.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [167.1.158.29] (HELO cvgmx2.convergys.com) (167.1.158.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:31:02 +0000 Received: from CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com (CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com [155.90.28.181]) by cvgmx2.convergys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73054D049 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Anubhav Hanjura is out of the office. From: anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:00:35 +0530 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 6.5.5FP3|March 22, 2007) at 09/28/2009 06:30:40 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=EABBFCACDFE8201F8f9e8a93df938690918cEABBFCACDFE8201F" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=EABBFCACDFE8201F8f9e8a93df938690918cEABBFCACDFE8201F Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I will be out of the office starting 09/29/2009 and will not return un= til 10/05/2009. -- "NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmissio= n is intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual o= r entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this electr= onic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply e= mail or by telephone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be corrected."= --0__=EABBFCACDFE8201F8f9e8a93df938690918cEABBFCACDFE8201F-- From general-return-541-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Sep 28 22:42:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37364 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 22:42:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 22:42:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 75861 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 22:42:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75788 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 22:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75778 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 22:42:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:42:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:42:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 37330 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 22:42:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:42:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:42:15 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > I've got concerns about this. Both tactical and strategic. The tactical > problem is that I need to get security (both Kerberos and token) in to > 0.22. I'd really like to get Avro RPC into 0.22. I'd like both to be > done roughly in 5 months. If you switch off of the current RPC code base > to a completely new RPC code base, I don't see that happening. What transport do you expect to use with Avro? If wire-compatibility is a goal, and that includes access from languages besides Java, then we must use a transport that's well-specified and Java-independent. HTTP is both of these. The existing Hadoop RPC protocol is not. We could adapting Hadoop's existing RPC transport to be well-specified and language independent. This is perhaps not a huge task, but it feels to me a bit like re-inventing much of what's already in HTTP clients and servers these days: connection-pooling, async servers, etc. Plus we take on the onus of fully specifying the transport, so that it may be implemented in other languages, and we need to provide some alternate implementations to demonstrate this. Do you feel our existing RPC framework's transport is actually more scalable and reliable than, say, Jetty? Do you think it would be substantially harder to add, e.g., token-based security to Jetty than to a homegrown server? > [ HTTP ] also has a couple of disadvantages: > - poor integration with kerberos Do you think it would be substantially harder to integrate Kerberos with Jetty than with a homegrown protocol and server? > - very expensive on the wire encryption (ssl) If we don't use HTTP, will we be providing on-wire encryption? If not, this is moot. Finally, need to have secure HTTP-based access anyway, right? If we use HTTP as our RPC transport mightn't we reuse most of that effort? Doug From general-return-542-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 05:12:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30019 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 05:12:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 05:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 30185 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 05:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30107 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 05:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30097 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 05:12:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:27 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so4228557qyk.5 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:12:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DNjcdieNS1XjTe8gdSru14wqFZjGrmMj0pLJrdsY9LE=; b=BS4F3Aw8Nu1m4qhLGqgnV1iLxEP65+kVKzWBj2NWZ0hzFDgSY1DnHhC4HbiszepBAr j2Ip17RGEmawLlosm4A6I9UxhvvUW62jBgM3IaQg9s0aeyakUwqwlcGTZVidHr5TXycv 7+FyMZ84QtkAXui62cPfllIeCvxdpRxKGxB0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GBbeS4NOhsHzWgMOYZeX7ug6otDO5u0Y/G5kkW38zCrmQzlOQkn2YOnJsZ9VCXyIzq Up2I3Ss28qBNATadbxtoa6W+3GKK48IAOrOdy2ZpNqFar9IRLh52COppEOZ9jz1DWPwi II0OCqRu30xuEBpp00pgzxF5nnnboVSZmvS/U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.45.19 with SMTP id c19mr503938qcf.0.1254201126613; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:12:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> References: <2B8EEA26-46D4-4D77-997A-A3394790613F@apache.org> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:12:06 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 85cc9fb4d4a197ad Message-ID: <7c962aed0909282212p77dbc9cex80923e08cb7f837@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create hbase-issues email list From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363ba12ea0f40d0474b074c5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363ba12ea0f40d0474b074c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Owen for running the vote. It looks like infrastructure created the list (it seems to work -- I can subscribe). I do not seem to be able to change hbase jira to send email notifications via the new mailing list According to the JIRA manual there is supposed to be a "Edit Configuration" for the "Mail Configuration" entry in the project detail list but I don't have such an option. Is this something you have privileges for? Thanks boss, St.Ack On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think we should create an hbase-issues lists to track that detailed jira > traffic and reduce the traffic on hbase-dev. It will replicate the structure > that we have in common, hdfs, and mapreduce. Clearly, I'm +1. > > -- Owen > --0016363ba12ea0f40d0474b074c5-- From general-return-543-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 18:52:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8145 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 18:52:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 18:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 96537 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 18:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96442 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 18:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96415 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 18:52:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:52:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:52:44 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n8TIq91Z011458 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=GHmsbPVLkQWwomtSK1yYoF7pFzYjLazX82GrdfOZ8Nq2A25JijOqlPUSJJ6TbrjJ Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-42-1065222992 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:52:09 -0700 References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-42-1065222992 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: > > I've got concerns about this. Both tactical and strategic. The > tactical > > problem is that I need to get security (both Kerberos and token) > in to > > 0.22. I'd really like to get Avro RPC into 0.22. I'd like both to be > > done roughly in 5 months. If you switch off of the current RPC > code base > > to a completely new RPC code base, I don't see that happening. > > What transport do you expect to use with Avro? If wire- > compatibility is > a goal, and that includes access from languages besides Java, then we > must use a transport that's well-specified and Java-independent. HTTP > is both of these. The existing Hadoop RPC protocol is not. > > We could adapting Hadoop's existing RPC transport to be well-specified > and language independent. This is perhaps not a huge task, but it > feels > to me a bit like re-inventing much of what's already in HTTP clients > and > servers these days: connection-pooling, async servers, etc. > Wrt connection pooling/async servers: Can't we use the same libraries that Jetty and Tomcat use? Grizzly? > grate Kerberos with > Jetty than with a homegrown protocol and server? > > > > - very expensive on the wire encryption (ssl) > > If we don't use HTTP, will we be providing on-wire encryption? If > not, > this is moot. > Yes we are expecting to use encryption down the road. > > Finally, need to have secure HTTP-based access anyway, right? If we > use > HTTP as our RPC transport mightn't we reuse most of that effort? > > Doug > --Apple-Mail-42-1065222992-- From general-return-544-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 19:43:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33690 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 19:43:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 19:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 73166 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 19:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73103 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 19:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73093 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 19:43:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:43:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:43:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 33604 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 19:43:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:43:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:43:24 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sanjay Radia wrote: > Wrt connection pooling/async servers: Can't we use the same libraries > that Jetty and Tomcat use? > Grizzly? Grizzly also supports HTTP. Choosing Grizzly is independent of choosing HTTP as a wire transport or choosing a server. The question I'm asking now is about the wire format, whether we wish to precede each RPC request with something like "GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.NameNode HTTP/1.1\n" and each response with "HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n", plus a couple of other headers in each case (e.g., Content-Type and Content-Length). I think there are great benefits to using a single, standard protocol on the wire. Which server and client implementations we use will be determined by performance, features, etc. But using a standard wire format will greatly simplify things as we attempt to support multiple languages. Since we want to provide browser access, we're compelled to support HTTP. So the question is, are there compelling reasons why HTTP should not be used for other, non-browser, access? > Yes we are expecting to use encryption down the road. Do we expect to use something different from TLS? With its 'resume' feature, is TLS performance unacceptable? Would we implement some other encryption protocol, or use a non-standards-based encryption protocol? Doug From general-return-545-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 20:39:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46455 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 20:39:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 20:39:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 36373 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 20:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36309 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 20:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36299 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 20:39:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:39:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:39:19 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1859937qwd.35 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GbpIaegajObWsSreHVIu5f3NdJq2hziMUixOYSBV0VU=; b=hRtvXYHN6bPn6fYEbfCqYDOe9Q8J5t/aeQB1hpidPU1J105bqsfLFN0FcfFSvoDlBX /srBnc7B5mHYwdJx1xBD9Mk/OQkNTLlGBHF/dpGIS3bab3X4mhN7bosvR9MKxtE2ojGK hsJOCLOq8SFkkkVvM7sNR9b5XnANTZNJjamvg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=m020aSYEewQLmi9njIJ4LQ9c4r12UHGOZnhxOaRDo+ZrrqmnqE9GLh2aw76mVcrboU y41zldvyhYBILeb2LfPMIBVrEuQ9uaMsObHRUSJZsMiM1in5in2LJJiaTTm2J8fomrTj U+A9qnfjg70eWnFLrI6lUsw1v2LVD2oHFdEbI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.69.83 with SMTP id y19mr2335603qci.50.1254256738954; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a9124d647c5ac91c Message-ID: <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032557f4ba61ecc90474bd677d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032557f4ba61ecc90474bd677d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > The question I'm asking now is about the wire format, whether we wish to > precede each RPC request with something like "GET > /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.NameNode HTTP/1.1\n" and each response with > "HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n", plus a couple of other headers in each case (e.g., > Content-Type and Content-Length). I think there are great benefits to using > a single, standard protocol on the wire. Which server and client > implementations we use will be determined by performance, features, etc. > But using a standard wire format will greatly simplify things as we attempt > to support multiple languages. Since we want to provide browser access, > we're compelled to support HTTP. So the question is, are there compelling > reasons why HTTP should not be used for other, non-browser, access? I like the idea of using a proven transport. The HTTP request and response header verbiage seems profligate if whats being passed is small. What do you think the path on the first line look like? Will it be a method name or will it be customizable? (In hbase, it might be nice to have path be /tablename/row/family/qualifier etc). St.Ack --00032557f4ba61ecc90474bd677d-- From general-return-546-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 21:09:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55389 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 21:09:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 21:09:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 72302 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 21:09:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72239 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 21:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72229 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 21:09:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:09:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:09:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 55301 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 21:08:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:08:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:08:44 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org stack wrote: > What do you think the path on the first line look like? Will it be a method > name or will it be customizable? Avro RPC currently includes the message name in the payload, so, unless that changes, for Avro RPC, we'd probably use a different URL per protocol. As a convention we might use the namespace-qualified protocol name as the URL path. Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and pull stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. The downside of that would be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, we'd end up with duplicated logic. If we fully embraced HTTP as Avro's primary RPC transport then it might make sense to move the message name to the URL and to use the HTTP return code to determine whether the response is an error or not. Avro's RPC payload also currently includes request and response metadata, which are functionally redundant with HTTP headers. > (In hbase, it might be nice to have path be /tablename/row/family/qualifier etc). It sounds like you'd perhaps like to be able to put RPC request parameters into the URL? I don't see that being done automatically in a general way for arbitrary parameter types without the URLs getting really ugly and adding a lot of complexity. For this it might be better to write a servlet filter that constructs the appropriate Avro-format request and forwards it to the RPC url. Doug From general-return-547-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 21:58:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77021 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 21:58:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 21:58:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 51895 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 21:58:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51836 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 21:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51826 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 21:58:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:58:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:57:54 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so4816693qyk.5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Uc9uXoakxbsrBA3Fa+qz+ZqZuvDXqoKBlGQlmmOnhOM=; b=wDMEzE+ZC5j1Os9J+Gy7t4KWwY5jc3BwzIkQFkLebEahqpc3RrGwGZHkKbQlmBRrQ4 kCzgydJUnEOKFvom6S/PysLDJ3orRm/F3YiQ7ZgU306oxXnLZpDUssdMULZbRa2JzCN/ NVLT3zJ1RjScNhnLqA7kA1RTtJTsrOnkLNBI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OtNGKYEAOL+bDhcnbiXYoMefv9QNT2wXsz5Q2R13p5qV3MD7eQ0DS7qj+15ayLzi5j zLrDEGBAsZhgy60z31xYfQhQvVBAovTEZWcc9AcekGv5XI4pTcIzHGPapZmQ0cuqHYuE bvEhJqWS6jYVrGwoXBJeE2gFe4kDQz6qRVW4g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.43.68 with SMTP id v4mr2423141qce.95.1254261453147; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:33 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ad395697f8c8bd10 Message-ID: <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f6c3605ecfec0474be8070 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f6c3605ecfec0474be8070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and pull > stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. The downside of that would > be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, we'd end up with > duplicated logic. > There would be loads of upside I'd imagine if there was a natural mapping of avro payload specifiers and metadata up into http headers in terms of visibility So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a request/response: GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 438 Connection: close Content-Type: X-avro/binary ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? St.Ack --001485f6c3605ecfec0474be8070-- From general-return-548-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 22:02:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78385 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 22:02:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 22:02:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 57804 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 22:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57748 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 22:02:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57738 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 22:02:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:02:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.168] (HELO web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:02:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 74931 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2009 22:02:01 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1254261720; bh=FEGSooHVNSpN7SPwfYMSgGb+ARXO8RgWvmtWqamudP4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gkdsJLisxdUKbvfJthtob23VXYkTYL6h1JzY6eHBFS65DISiz+mUsN/IAXY3V4Mi2wyB33bSAYM3CIWzo8G1gaC7HZqqO3w81H1FPMtfb4MqMRm18EMP7D/jBxWB96gMrCbXBtf+kig79SnbGGxJ9CgHcz/2ETylrcsWHD6jCaw= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wzNQQ+eZLMFQAJ2zie/Xq/6Z7rKiRzuG3hcir/qVJJCt1l0vd49TnvLNmLwe8HqTtSIqXUb+X8wTuVrh/TKpvVlgUyCafXTSQA19p7zJchw/Pp7S5FHb+gqCaWEqsbH1jDzd19n/QG01kNBiCju3t8+wG/lMtnCZgsiQlreh5Tg=; Message-ID: <931352.74710.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: nUEvM3IVM1mPuTfSRuq7QEXk8cDLJIjLL4lGEElwQuxC7b3QE3h.QuLysvg5g.ts3.DQAPGVYBdworgF29lcKNt1LUFfK.1BT7LflpEgUQjtUqIs56AQuVCVlLcK8SQPNpJ38iyQaLTNyhhG07mqanQFwU7NqEGKvjz_SJqRY50h6jwRiiutXAAjDqVI2qG.BIX.RNnOX0e5kTbF9AbgnkOXCvZjkIvJveg9x_JwAokVzRfzRhl.tWIeZQViWi0MfL2uEREQG3avcloAGkjx9rI6Asvie7Zo5BYsQ.cRM2orHUCali41abDL7JpOZQv80PF8 Received: from [216.239.45.4] by web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:02:00 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.3 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: ArrayList as a column value? To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-794499716-1254261720=:74710" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-794499716-1254261720=:74710 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, =0A =0AHow do I add values from an ArrayList to a column in a HTable? =0A =0ALet's say I have a "Product" table with columns:=A0 name, desc.=A0 Now I= =0Awant to add to each row a list of categories that a product belongs=0Ato= .=A0 I tried the following: =0A =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 for (String category : categories) { =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 put.add(Bytes.toBytes("info"), Bytes.toBytes= ("categories"), Bytes.toBytes(category)); =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 } =0A =0AThis doesn't work as expected.=A0 It only keeps one (last) category.=A0 = The=0Arest get overwritten.=A0 I tried using 'version', but that didn't wor= k=0Aeither.=A0 There's a put(KeyValue) method.=A0 Is that the one I am supp= osed=0Ato use? =0A =0AAny help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.=A0 Thanks. =0A =0A=0A=0A --0-794499716-1254261720=:74710-- From general-return-549-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 22:12:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80774 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 22:12:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 22:12:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 72888 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 22:12:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72812 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 22:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72799 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 22:12:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:12:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:12:41 +0000 Received: from [10.72.114.189] (specialwarm-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.114.189]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n8TMBRhE074133 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=1kWttednZqneThxfyy3tbRA/LcdFPoXhy5e/Nr/GoR9x5mwRKsOmokCsBUHoGrK1 Message-ID: <4AC2860F.1030801@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:11:27 -0700 From: Raghu Angadi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > stack wrote: >> What do you think the path on the first line look like? Will it be a >> method >> name or will it be customizable? > > Avro RPC currently includes the message name in the payload, so, unless > that changes, for Avro RPC, we'd probably use a different URL per > protocol. As a convention we might use the namespace-qualified protocol > name as the URL path. > > Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and > pull stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. The downside of > that would be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, > we'd end up with duplicated logic. Keeping Avro payload independent of transport seems pretty useful, at least for now. As understand Avro payload is Avro 'proper' (i.e. it issupported in all the languages supported by Avro... and other goodies). I just noticed AVRO-129 and it seems like a great example of using HTTP transport. Does this mean current Avro RPC transport (an improved version of Hadoop RPC) can still exist as long as it supported by developers? Where does security lie : Avro or Transport layer? If it is part of Avro : transport layer does not matter for security. If it is part of transport : How does an app get hold of required information (e.g. user identity). May be 'transceiver' can have an interface that can transfer security information between transport layer and Avro. Raghu. > If we fully embraced HTTP as Avro's primary RPC transport then it might > make sense to move the message name to the URL and to use the HTTP > return code to determine whether the response is an error or not. Avro's > RPC payload also currently includes request and response metadata, which > are functionally redundant with HTTP headers. > >> (In hbase, it might be nice to have path be >> /tablename/row/family/qualifier etc). > > It sounds like you'd perhaps like to be able to put RPC request > parameters into the URL? I don't see that being done automatically in a > general way for arbitrary parameter types without the URLs getting > really ugly and adding a lot of complexity. For this it might be better > to write a servlet filter that constructs the appropriate Avro-format > request and forwards it to the RPC url. > > Doug From general-return-550-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 23:17:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98698 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 23:17:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 23:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 54666 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:17:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54579 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54569 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 23:17:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:17:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:17:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 98620 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 23:17:04 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:17:04 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:17:03 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org stack wrote: > So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a > request/response: > > GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.example.com > > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT > Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) > Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT > Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 438 > Connection: close > Content-Type: X-avro/binary > > > ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit most of those response headers except Content-Length. Are any others strictly required? I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-129 In some simple benchmarks I am able to make over 5000 sequential RPCs/second, each with ~100 bytes of response payload. Increasing response payloads to 100kB slows this to around 2500 RPCs/second, giving throughput of 250MB/second, or 2.5Gbit/s. This is with both client and server running on my laptop. The client is java.net.URLConnection and the server is Jetty with its default configuration. Doug From general-return-551-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 23:35:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5679 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 23:35:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 23:35:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 70741 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70662 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70652 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:35:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 5621 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 23:35:15 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:35:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4AC299B2.8050400@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:35:14 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <4AC2860F.1030801@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4AC2860F.1030801@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Raghu Angadi wrote: > Does this mean current Avro RPC transport (an improved version of Hadoop > RPC) can still exist as long as it supported by developers? Sure, folks can create new transports for Avro. There is, for example, in Hadoop Common some code that tunnels Avro RPCs inside Hadoop RPCs. > Where does security lie : Avro or Transport layer? That's not yet clear. If we settle on HTTP as the preferred transport, then the transport should probably handle security, since many security standards already exist for HTTP and many HTTP servers and clients already support adding new security mechanisms. I'd rather not re-invent all this in Avro if we can avoid it. > If it is part of transport : How does an app get hold of required > information (e.g. user identity). Perhaps the way we currently do this in the RPC server, with thread locals? For example, the Avro RPC servlet could have a static method that returns that returns the value of HttpServletRequest#getUserPrincipal(). > May be 'transceiver' can have an interface that can transfer security > information between transport layer and Avro. Yes, we could add methods like getPrincipal() to Transciever, but we'd still probably need to use a thread local accessed by a static method to get the Transciever if we continue to use reflection for server implementations. Or we could stray from reflection, and make services implement an interface through which we can pass them things like the principal. Doug From general-return-552-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Sep 29 23:58:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11756 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2009 23:58:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2009 23:58:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 86239 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:58:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86137 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2009 23:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86127 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2009 23:58:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:58:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:58:41 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n8TNvYcx021942 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:57:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=xnK6zAWp8In3PbZakCVUYO5X2dG3Js/PvF0mjJLdx0TTrXxSvg1knw+uh9BI8p5X Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:57:33 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:57:31 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpBWywlZmAutc7dTNSnntYSTy7nawABW8OE Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6E7ECFBD5F0ddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6E7ECFBD5F0ddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of curiosity, do we have such numbers for the current hadoop RPC? On 9/29/09 4:17 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: stack wrote: > So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a > request/response: > > GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.example.com > > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT > Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) > Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT > Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 438 > Connection: close > Content-Type: X-avro/binary > > > ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit most of those response headers except Content-Length. Are any others strictly required? I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-129 In some simple benchmarks I am able to make over 5000 sequential RPCs/second, each with ~100 bytes of response payload. Increasing response payloads to 100kB slows this to around 2500 RPCs/second, giving throughput of 250MB/second, or 2.5Gbit/s. This is with both client and server running on my laptop. The client is java.net.URLConnection and the server is Jetty with its default configuration. Doug --_000_C6E7ECFBD5F0ddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-553-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 01:38:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51650 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 01:38:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 01:38:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 55262 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 01:38:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55189 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 01:38:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55171 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 01:38:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:38:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.16] (HELO EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:38:06 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.16]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:37:45 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:37:35 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpBWwSLrypcEXd4TlmQxIIxaVoQUgAE5FS/ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C6E8046F12C6Ascottrichrelevancecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C6E8046F12C6Ascottrichrelevancecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable BTW, java.net.UrlConnection is the likely bottleneck there - it stinks perf= ormance-wise. The Apache commons http client is much faster. Try out usin= g Jmeter and switch from one connector to the other for an example. On 9/29/09 4:17 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: stack wrote: > So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a > request/response: > > GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.example.com > > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT > Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) > Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT > Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 438 > Connection: close > Content-Type: X-avro/binary > > > ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit most of those response headers except Content-Length. Are any others strictly required? I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-129 In some simple benchmarks I am able to make over 5000 sequential RPCs/second, each with ~100 bytes of response payload. Increasing response payloads to 100kB slows this to around 2500 RPCs/second, giving throughput of 250MB/second, or 2.5Gbit/s. This is with both client and server running on my laptop. The client is java.net.URLConnection and the server is Jetty with its default configuration. Doug --_000_C6E8046F12C6Ascottrichrelevancecom_-- From general-return-554-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 03:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76964 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 03:07:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 03:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 99962 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 03:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99826 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 03:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99816 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 03:07:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:07:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:06:53 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:06:33 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:06:22 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpBT+192SUEA7aMSymjKr7qp00t4AAKw+Fi Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 9/29/09 2:57 PM, "stack" wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and pul= l >> stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. The downside of that wou= ld >> be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, we'd end up wi= th >> duplicated logic. >>=20 >=20 >=20 > There would be loads of upside I'd imagine if there was a natural mapping= of > avro payload specifiers and metadata up into http headers in terms of > visibility >=20 There are some very serious disadvantages to headers if overused. I highly advise keeping what goes into the URL and headers very specific to support well defined features for this specific transport type. Otherwise, put it in the data payload for all transports. A couple header disadvantages: * Limited character set allowed. You can't put any data in there you want, and you can end up with an inefficient encoding mess that is not easy to read. * Headers don't take advantage of other transport features. For example, Content-Encoding:gzip provides gzip compression support for the data payload, but you can't compress the headers in HTTP. On the other hand, Custom headers can be handy ways to implement transport specific handshakes or advertize capabilities (which helps build in cross-version compatibility). But browsers only work with the standard ones, so whatever 'browser requirement' is out there is going to be a limited subset no matter how you do it. This thread brings up the security features. Payload encryption does not seem to be a transport feature -- but it could be done via something like Content-Encoding (X-Avro-Content-Encrypted?). It seems to fit better IMO within the payload itself, or at the socket / network level via SSH or a secure tunnel. Authentication is a better fit for the transport layer -- but as mentioned elsewhere if it has to be done for all transports, could it fit in the payload somehow?=20 >=20 > So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a > request/response: >=20 > GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.example.com >=20 >=20 > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT > Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) > Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT > Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 438 > Connection: close > Content-Type: X-avro/binary >=20 Its acceptable to drop a lot of the headers above. Some of them are useful to implement extended functionality -- the Etag can be used for caching if that were desired, for example. Keep-Alive connections and chunked responses are nice built-ins too. >=20 > ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? >=20 > St.Ack >=20 From general-return-555-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 03:21:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81897 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 03:21:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 03:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10122 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 03:21:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10024 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 03:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10014 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 03:21:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:21:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.186] (HELO mail-vw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.212.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:21:04 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so3859189vws.2 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:20:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/nNEJPLJn7szlBU0LWThtLVBIDJyBjsK2MPYypEhss=; b=bGBAyxFH6AKCdkb1diP94s2f7eoXOowz+Y97J7AMUxjKrjm+bRUMMIuUOvTflC9HcA mEgyJ68gs+jQg87k/zh00+sb70ULGVhSCDNwfQLlfsVTXbdhheq8b3TWu9J5Hgfno10r SGqS3DrbSv8Lj66xeJWQQJmWC4Y98lzhxSfho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kZHhLAQsZK+su7Jmu8v8xn7+saCYgdFX1ubGDwzCXokDaSxif5BGpsDjZHQ4oyuCdE GIgLWHgnw6Xu5kgElrNM0wNearDh7cqSmzudGUso+/HeE7dcr+DFgDRkhqH8ctUloCyR amWcjqJzqHMMXYCSuPQaXVWAnNRqiTvuAZyOs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.69.21 with SMTP id x21mr9512569vci.9.1254280843184; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:20:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:20:43 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10909292020r21f2c765jbe091941d5003355@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I wanted to chime in on a few things, since avro is a candidate for the HBase RPC. I am not sure that "browser compatibility" is a legitimate requirement for this kind of thing. It is at odds with high performance in a number of areas, and isn't the driving factor for using HTTP anyways. Security - you can get the advantage of security standards, such as the X.509 SSL cert, without actually using HTTPS. Headers - I don't really think providing a caching mechanism built into the RPC layer is a top requirement. We'd then have to build in a GET/POST idempotent flag into the Avro IDL, and everyone would have to get it right, etc. Considering my top requirement is "make bulk data access and RPC rate/sec as high as possible", I'm not sure caching fits in here and can work against that. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Scott Carey wrot= e: > > > > On 9/29/09 2:57 PM, "stack" wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote= : >> >>> >>> Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and pu= ll >>> stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. =A0The downside of that = would >>> be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, we'd end up w= ith >>> duplicated logic. >>> >> >> >> There would be loads of upside I'd imagine if there was a natural mappin= g of >> avro payload specifiers and metadata up into http headers in terms of >> visibility >> > > There are some very serious disadvantages to headers if overused. > > I highly advise keeping what goes into the URL and headers very specific = to > support well defined features for this specific transport type. =A0Otherw= ise, > put it in the data payload for all transports. > > A couple header disadvantages: > * Limited character set allowed. =A0You can't put any data in there you w= ant, > and you can end up with an inefficient encoding mess that is not easy to > read. > * Headers don't take advantage of other transport features. =A0For exampl= e, > Content-Encoding:gzip provides gzip compression support for the data > payload, but you can't compress the headers in HTTP. > > On the other hand, Custom headers can be handy ways to implement transpor= t > specific handshakes or advertize capabilities (which helps build in > cross-version compatibility). > But browsers only work with the standard ones, so whatever 'browser > requirement' is out there is going to be a limited subset no matter how y= ou > do it. > > This thread brings up the security features. =A0Payload encryption does n= ot > seem to be a transport feature -- but it could be done via something like > Content-Encoding (X-Avro-Content-Encrypted?). =A0It seems to fit better I= MO > within the payload itself, or at the socket / network level via SSH or a > secure tunnel. > > Authentication is a better fit for the transport layer -- but as mentione= d > elsewhere if it has to be done for all transports, could it fit in the > payload somehow? > >> >> So, are we're talking about doing something like following for a >> request/response: >> >> =A0GET /avro/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.RegionServer HTTP/1.1 >> =A0Host: www.example.com >> >> >> =A0HTTP/1.1 200 OK >> =A0Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:38:34 GMT >> =A0Server: Apache/1.3.3.7 (Unix) =A0(Red-Hat/Linux) >> =A0Last-Modified: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:11:55 GMT >> =A0Etag: "3f80f-1b6-3e1cb03b" >> =A0Accept-Ranges: bytes >> =A0Content-Length: 438 >> =A0Connection: close >> =A0Content-Type: X-avro/binary >> > > Its acceptable to drop a lot of the headers above. =A0Some of them are us= eful > to implement extended functionality -- the Etag can be used for caching i= f > that were desired, for example. =A0Keep-Alive connections and chunked > responses are nice built-ins too. > >> >> ... or some variation on above on each and every RPC? >> >> St.Ack >> > > From general-return-556-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 16:22:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27452 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 16:22:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 16:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 98131 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 16:22:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98087 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 16:22:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98077 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 16:22:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:22:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.204] (HELO web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:22:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 65192 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2009 16:22:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1254327729; bh=dIBJ4FouLfHPyOJ/OB3C53vrkZtezcccRK100EKufIA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MyJ62+WSc4KD7N/wpOmSZfUugyh0Lx+kOAy9EHAidnjhNHmqGsP6m6Jm46kh7v+L84DhiIymA0VYyvEF0de7rDVvDazp9bJNRdVb3e2u+1zqArnRsq7gkrV13FKdJbns8MJfClOu/BrB5xBEHURAyAAjYRiBhd6G+36nDHR/cj4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SAztRV58DV1m8tdVIMNooPyQ10lMwdzRaQOZoUGjSzApGG6iGJWZuQlVcP9j6NmNmNIuAvetY/woFWPhgAVmnwFMHZODRjT1unGtndDLyuPQ9rbHDqAQb6g2RKlN3UqR3oRMCNeiMaKvVmfh3zpoxU+pOkUj0QJLEkOZ0waauws=; Message-ID: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: _aEegsQVM1ksqeAznsVzVZno2EN3UTuI0Z.0Jk4XHteTVFDhKZ76cfmKElYz0iavAqAqnj4Kwalz.2mKZqYkjCFNeu5ZZRv9GQw1VYKVJ0Jb7ayfOKgTYizt8c6hdZZdMk9fhDOaNdNqbHgFfEHG7KCDj8jLLTKme6s.pZ_LOtVlU86p_v2wsqU7.pMYM2cwTp9hfbTh7XJsWWOHdvTlgfXmUJxMgFk1HCDdfIW11R_Ea8japz2HtaAvJeDba9q6Tpvegyy8LbISNBOmIOQeE2TPrho7Z6G1RQ8G.THrXNe68FxtIwBXwm52niS2.3XNB732 Received: from [216.239.45.4] by web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:22:09 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.3 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:22:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: HBase configuration... To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-113412847-1254327729=:64930" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-113412847-1254327729=:64930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I noticed that if I start HBase in "standalone" mode it creates a table in = memory.=A0 In other words, after rebooting the machine, the table goes away= .=A0 I would like to persist the table to a local file system.=A0 How can I= do that?=A0 Do I have to use "Psuedo Distribution" mode for this? Please help.=A0 Thanks. =0A=0A=0A --0-113412847-1254327729=:64930-- From general-return-557-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 21:43:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99819 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 21:43:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 21:43:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8838 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 21:42:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8739 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 21:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8729 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 21:42:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:42:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.188] (HELO mail-qy0-f188.google.com) (209.85.221.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:42:48 +0000 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so5748058qyk.5 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xHTtXMuWiIrxCo4G0Dp0Z43UXxKC888lC66OIn83Dxw=; b=pVSIZt03/uXhjZytRcTJHg2C5JVfmaC4UBk3nBAqVrmBuXkdoLOgiDC+Q1EZ/Gdh4p 22S2S0UyYRoEsH45rMfbuSsFju10p5b3Qo4w4L6qz9cISl5VyA15K9hOF/MPDoDdJ9B0 bYxNwRuuw8Sq5XrFzgBXn6gfjlohz8u6/pgKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XC+mj0gcwSY06AUFwq0zEchjBR0Ldvtf42rlvszU2ZpZha6qxRE9cOX1Y6yVhjpilF CbY5EjD01nDKgcpm8el4IHraH6r6BKkBiRJh80S3WdEku2BNLPtYr0Akqm0k03WEzHNs 6cQ1RwQ+rfLlogBk41S0IHpjtGe1ruStZu15Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.31.211 with SMTP id z19mr254437qcc.24.1254346945616; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:42:25 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4410559c9aa9cec5 Message-ID: <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HBase configuration... From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364eeba81e5b8d0474d268c8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364eeba81e5b8d0474d268c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Shut it down cleanly (./bin/stop-hbase.sh). My guess is that you are killing it before it has chance to flush its in-memory state. HBase questions will get more timely response if posted to the hbase lists (see hbase.org). Yours, St.Ack St.Ack On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Something Something wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that if I start HBase in "standalone" mode it creates a table in > memory. In other words, after rebooting the machine, the table goes away. > I would like to persist the table to a local file system. How can I do > that? Do I have to use "Psuedo Distribution" mode for this? > > Please help. Thanks. > > > > > --0016364eeba81e5b8d0474d268c8-- From general-return-558-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 22:33:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16541 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 22:33:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 22:33:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 69132 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 22:33:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69056 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 22:33:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69046 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 22:33:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:33:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.210] (HELO web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:33:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 69337 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2009 22:33:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1254349980; bh=MFBzsm/EQiUOkwMmKVpnwZon9uBn8ustxLzTAyFLjeA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MHn+Ctvf/B9EKcd8IyELtP3xA9WKGmKRZSzM5uav7m+AROYHYFBJV7dMeNn2PLjDlrdF4JZyM0oteQBW591LHME4sJZP8hR4QrsEcPQzVc/+n91PBJH5sRkp7OBBMoDv9l5i60qCGvCn/ZFb7x0DxVNNSd/DApLOzR2KwCgy75c= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4hV1ExUYq7eIvpMFv7IUk4f15MXsSvKezMfNqHizDTdPSmKkzEAXJTwm7ZgqyQrFWPxjECXW7wj2hIDlK9D22wP34NjekmA5EF8PbpFvPQqRuBs3QMekPzf7Ulz4HrUXLB4cyg7ThEAJeKQXVArhVsdQq/1c57DVdnPOcBHoIQE=; Message-ID: <231420.69323.qm@web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: lQqNL0AVM1nKwMJZWYihByPDrp4g6ukHdAiiArzvmvEDi1e5fsBKCkBYQCxB63uPobKtjj2wTyVTTLID0LmliEAc5YDB7Jg2IefXAD_qLmc62CkflI21yZxsAPpq.cUVoezkr34I5GvmqWAyhyCPAoYUSyKlps0mghoKx3hzRQWv3Ze1tF5iyaPk4nHZH2BbeGIwj6M3nXoH7y0vF9cvEQcRL7rDF9qkMcsecIzW6Aol7v6X6i4ilEm.Vyx5QsUZWMJ_EKh8UBmNK8i6rjh.pxVYpM3hVKpV5GTHmxQVaSXVKw-- Received: from [75.54.226.161] by web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:33:00 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.2 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:33:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: HBase configuration... To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1358326848-1254349980=:69323" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1358326848-1254349980=:69323 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hmmm.. Interesting... I could swear the 2nd time around I had run stop-hbas= e.sh before rebooting. =A0But may be I didn't wait long enough. =A0My job a= dds over 100 million rows to a table. =A0I have plenty of free space on my = hard drive, so I am assuming this will all work in "standalone" mode, corre= ct? =A0(Just doing a proof of concept for now.) In any case, thanks for the reply. =A0It sounds like the tables should get = persisted to disk. =A0Will try once again. =A0Thanks. --- On Wed, 9/30/09, stack wrote: From: stack Subject: Re: HBase configuration... To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 2:42 PM Shut it down cleanly (./bin/stop-hbase.sh).=A0 My guess is that you are killing it before it has chance to flush its in-memory state. HBase questions will get more timely response if posted to the hbase lists (see hbase.org). Yours, St.Ack St.Ack On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Something Something wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that if I start HBase in "standalone" mode it creates a table i= n > memory.=A0 In other words, after rebooting the machine, the table goes aw= ay. > I would like to persist the table to a local file system.=A0 How can I do > that?=A0 Do I have to use "Psuedo Distribution" mode for this? > > Please help.=A0 Thanks. > > > > > =0A=0A=0A --0-1358326848-1254349980=:69323-- From general-return-559-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 23:05:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25583 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 23:05:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 23:05:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12097 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 23:05:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12019 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 23:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12009 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 23:05:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:05:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:05:30 +0000 Received: from [172.16.132.152] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c195.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.195]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n8UN3FkM018908 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:04:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=KeWgJR/B8xqV1Wi6aRN/kox0R3DCYtKj2ejN7sfBQcUZi4yyeW7COs8a8sUALpMr Message-Id: <076526D4-2D47-4841-99E0-9D3678ED7F99@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-45--980739934 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:04:10 -0700 References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-45--980739934 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > ... > > Alternately, we could try to make Avro's RPC more HTTP-friendly, and > pull stuff out of Avro's payload into HTTP headers. The downside of > that would be that, if we still wish to support non-HTTP transports, > we'd end up with duplicated logic. > I would prefer to retain layer independence so that we can use other transports. (I am still not sold on HTTP as a transport so far but am listening with an open mind). > > --Apple-Mail-45--980739934-- From general-return-560-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Sep 30 23:08:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25970 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 23:08:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 23:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 13716 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 23:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13633 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2009 23:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13623 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2009 23:08:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:08:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 209.85.222.198 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kpeterson@biz360.com) Received: from [209.85.222.198] (HELO mail-pz0-f198.google.com) (209.85.222.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:08:32 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so2566872pzk.5 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:08:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.210.17 with SMTP id i17mr33077wfg.29.1254352090705; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:08:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <231420.69323.qm@web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> <231420.69323.qm@web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:08:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBase configuration... From: Kevin Peterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32ed6ca30620474d39a5e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd32ed6ca30620474d39a5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Something Something wrote: > Hmmm.. Interesting... I could swear the 2nd time around I had run > stop-hbase.sh before rebooting. But may be I didn't wait long enough. My > job adds over 100 million rows to a table. I have plenty of free space on > my hard drive, so I am assuming this will all work in "standalone" mode, > correct? (Just doing a proof of concept for now.) > > By default it gets saved into /tmp, which on many machines gets cleared out every night or after every boot. Set hbase.rootdir to something else (writable) to ensure it isn't cleared on reboot. --000e0cd32ed6ca30620474d39a5e-- From general-return-2920-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 00:28:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42222 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 00:28:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 00:28:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 96786 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:28:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96694 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:28:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96686 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 00:28:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:28:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:27:56 +0000 Received: by yib17 with SMTP id 17so2450891yib.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:27:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VzFaMlzInQpReSO5S0QQ8mOsn8V99RQqAacg1bLWkwk=; b=Bf0/zdX42B06K/PXsW5QqBrWaxmtYdubCqYJR8NiMfa99aUS1vCeUsCyW8nr2ULUo8 aPZHWsq1Z5Kw1ZkkRaoqDLeafFDRlag0AfyxFm2RRdx6CWXvQeDd9C68Y+46AdshQCq/ pCeJbmyFmVpj0co0153PI5qzYgHLde4WngIv8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aTXtJB4PBUkqjXPJr2adAD8vjtVbW0DqtjstMaRHJ350ZA7eV190jYpovH9U2BcMvP 8CNbe8lFhAAX6uTTs0cJgFORPu6z4ZWy8MEuXEDs6Ix7Jb87WiTx27WtAOY1cwZriQia 142rO9QQyrkVN09FeYq4QPf7MhWeWyegfZos4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.108.43 with SMTP id p31mr14127738yhg.22.1296520054330; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:27:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:27:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:27:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fbe2e4865ea049b2d99c4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba4fbe2e4865ea049b2d99c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Giri looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. Any thoughts on what's going on? Thanks, --Konstantin On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven > repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. > > For settings.xml template pls look at > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > > I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. > > -Giri > > > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > > By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile > > trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are > > there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel > > and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past > > them. > > -Jakob > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > >> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. > Try to > >> build trunk. > >> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by > HADOOP-6904 > >> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. > >> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. > >> > >> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > >> build is broken. See here. > >> > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > >> > >> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated > >> HADOOP-6864. > >> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be > digested > >> by Hudson since then. > >> > >> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caused > by > >> HADOOP-6864. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> --Konstantin > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > >> > >>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the > one > >>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the > >>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tale > I > >>> heard from infra. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey Konstantin, > >>>> > >>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > >>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > >>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream > >>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Eli > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > >>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > >>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > >>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think > >>> those > >>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > >>>>> restored promptly. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > >>> emails. > >>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > >>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > >>>> mapreduce > >>>>>> both not compiling. > >>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. > >>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>> > >>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>> > >>> > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > >>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > >>>> > >>> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > >>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > >>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... > a.out > >>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting > >>>>>> Build was aborted > >>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > >>>>>> Publishing Javadoc > >>>>>> Archiving artifacts > >>>>>> Recording test results > >>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Recording fingerprints > >>>>>> [exec] Terminated > >>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... > >>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > >>>>>> No emails were triggered. > >>>>>> Finished: ABORTED > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --90e6ba4fbe2e4865ea049b2d99c4-- From general-return-2921-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 00:41:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46822 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 00:41:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 00:41:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 11262 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11201 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11193 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:41:04 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p110eT6i054994 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:40:29 -0800 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:40:28 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Topic: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Index: AcvBqJ/6VhKWdNn+RhyDr1/eI3M8aA== Message-ID: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Konstantin, I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For = now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. Thanks, Giri On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Giri > looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. > Any thoughts on what's going on? > Thanks, > --Konstantin >=20 > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > wrote: >=20 >> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven >> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>=20 >> For settings.xml template pls look at >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>=20 >> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>=20 >> -Giri >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>=20 >>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile >>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are >>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel >>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past >>> them. >>> -Jakob >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>> wrote: >>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. >> Try to >>>> build trunk. >>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >> HADOOP-6904 >>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>=20 >>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because Hadoop-Common-trunk-Comm= it >>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>=20 >> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-= trunk-Commit/ >>>>=20 >>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be >> digested >>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>=20 >>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caus= ed >> by >>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> --Konstantin >>>>=20 >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is th= e >> one >>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that t= he >>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tal= e >> I >>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote= : >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstre= am >>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Eli >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >>>>> those >>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>>>> emails. >>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.= class)] >>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_= security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >> a.out >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2922-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 00:58:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51889 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 00:58:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 00:58:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 28562 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28508 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28500 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 00:58:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:58:24 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2451823yxm.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:58:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cyljU9HljYwCm1QQiAyVIs9t6E0lMU68UJjak0gcQVs=; b=NGAavLJ8azmcSB8YF+h/7VseJWQ9r7yTBEZcS1gx8Js91VRJm79gVHGUbfJABspb2p hh7MvT8xkn2Pdhcej2eXYPeJ2pQzF0zEWGYRi+vJYwaim1XmQeaOh6v8deXN+swgkRe6 Mfxw8ZOHw1U6RAoxPjOypUwN4ANgemZERKJnk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QSC3xBdSrnWbF7UzQpZ+KGrn1suwmc3g62BID8dpizx++4wdNuX9w0fPdm4j6Z/d8x EHiKt8CCG4XSIYQpoByzypW1gJkV+7J6T5onsDQRO1tYYfS8AwCBJtOaI3OHG/pPI73a 61Cpn1mNsQSYypYLP7Zr6+Z/69IcEKJB2Bm9w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.105.161 with SMTP id k21mr14018670yhg.87.1296521883101; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:58:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:58:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:58:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba25e53b492bbd049b2e060c --90e6ba25e53b492bbd049b2e060c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, Giri. --Konst On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Konstantin, > > I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For > now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. > > Thanks, > Giri > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > Giri > > looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. > > Any thoughts on what's going on? > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > > wrote: > > > >> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven > >> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. > >> > >> For settings.xml template pls look at > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > >> > >> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. > >> > >> -Giri > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> > >>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile > >>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are > >>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel > >>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past > >>> them. > >>> -Jakob > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>> wrote: > >>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. > >> Try to > >>>> build trunk. > >>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by > >> HADOOP-6904 > >>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. > >>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. > >>>> > >>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because > Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > >>>> build is broken. See here. > >>>> > >> > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > >>>> > >>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated > >>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be > >> digested > >>>> by Hudson since then. > >>>> > >>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is > caused > >> by > >>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> --Konstantin > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is > the > >> one > >>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that > the > >>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the > tale > >> I > >>>>> heard from infra. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Konstantin, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > >>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > >>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the > upstream > >>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Eli > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > >>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > >>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > >>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think > >>>>> those > >>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > >>>>>>> restored promptly. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > >>>>> emails. > >>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > >>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > >>>>>> mapreduce > >>>>>>>> both not compiling. > >>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. > >>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... > >> a.out > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting > >>>>>>>> Build was aborted > >>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > >>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc > >>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts > >>>>>>>> Recording test results > >>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints > >>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated > >>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... > >>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > >>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. > >>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > --90e6ba25e53b492bbd049b2e060c-- From general-return-2923-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 03:28:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22010 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 03:28:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 03:28:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 22900 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 03:28:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22406 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 03:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22397 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 03:28:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:28:22 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p113RmAM075650 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:27:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.73.152.246) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:27:47 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:27:45 -0800 Message-ID: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> To: MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Folks, I'm pleased to announce that after some reflection, Yahoo! has decided = to discontinue the "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" and focus on = Apache Hadoop. We plan to remove all references to a Yahoo distribution = from our website (developer.yahoo.com/hadoop), close our github repo = (yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common) and focus on working more closely with = the Apache community. Our intent is to return to helping Apache produce = binary releases of Apache Hadoop that are so bullet proof that Yahoo and = other production Hadoop users can run them unpatched on their clusters. Until Hadoop 0.20, Yahoo committers worked as release masters to produce = binary Apache Hadoop releases that the entire community used on their = clusters. As the community grew, we have experiment with using the = "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" as the vehicle to share our work. = Unfortunately, Apache is no longer the obvious place to go for Hadoop = releases. The Yahoo! team wants to return to a world where anyone can = download and directly use releases of Hadoop from Apache. We want to = contribute to the stabilization and testing of those releases. We also = want to share our regular program of sustaining engineering that = backports minor feature enhancements into new dot releases on a regular = basis, so that the world sees regular improvements coming from Apache = every few months, not years. Recently the Apache Hadoop community has been very turbulent. Over the = last few months we have been developing Hadoop enhancements in our = internal git repository while doing a complete review of our options. = Our commitment to open sourcing our work was never in doubt (see = http://yhoo.it/e8p3Dd), but the future of the "Yahoo distribution of = Hadoop" was far from clear. We've concluded that focusing on Apache = Hadoop is the way forward. We believe that more focus on communicating = our goals to the Apache Hadoop community, and more willingness to = compromise on how we get to those goals, will help us get back to making = Hadoop even better. Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several = person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git = repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our = sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. = Hadoop-0.20-sustaining is the stable version of Hadoop we currently run = on Yahoo's 40,000 nodes. It contains a series of fixes and enhancements = that are all backwards compatible with our "Hadoop 0.20 with security". = It is our most stable and high performance release of Hadoop ever. = We've expended a lot of energy finding and fixing bugs in it this year. = We have initiated the process of contributing this work to Apache in the = branch: hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security. We've proposed = calling this the 20.100 release. Once folks have had a chance to try = this out and we've had a chance to respond to their feedback, we plan to = create 20.100 release candidates and ask the community to vote on making = them Apache releases.=20 Hadoop-future is our new feature branch. We are working on a set of new = features for Hadoop to improve its availability, scalability and = interoperability to make Hadoop more usable in mission critical = deployments. You're going to see another burst of email activity from us = as we work to get hadoop-future patches socialized, reviewed and checked = in. These bulk checkins are exceptional. They are the result of us = striving to be more transparent. Once we've merged our hadoop-future = and hadoop-0.20-sustaining work back into Apache, folks can expect us to = return to our regular development cadence. Looking forward, we plan to = socialize our roadmaps regularly, actively synchronize our work with = other active Hadoop contributors and develop our code collaboratively, = directly in Apache. In summary, our decision to discontinue the "Yahoo! Distribution of = Hadoop" is a commitment to working more effectively with the Apache = Hadoop community. Our goal is to make Apache Hadoop THE open source = platform for big data. Thanks, E14 -- PS Here is a draft list of key features in hadoop-future: * HDFS-1052 - Federation, the ability to support much more storage per = Hadoop cluster. * HADOOP-6728 - A the new metrics framework * MAPREDUCE-1220 - Optimizations for small jobs --- PPS This is cross-posted on our blog: http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W= From general-return-2924-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 03:44:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26996 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 03:44:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 03:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 33729 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 03:44:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33285 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 03:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33270 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 03:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 03:44:24 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2532287gxk.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:44:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.57.20 with SMTP id f20mr1876178yba.446.1296531842749; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.83.9 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:44:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:44:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd307c6ed54e3049b3057f6 --000e0cd307c6ed54e3049b3057f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Excellent news! Will you also make Howl, Oozie, and Yarn Apache projects as well? On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm pleased to announce that after some reflection, Yahoo! has decided to > discontinue the "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" and focus on Apache > Hadoop. We plan to remove all references to a Yahoo distribution from our > website (developer.yahoo.com/hadoop), close our github repo ( > yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common) and focus on working more closely with the > Apache community. Our intent is to return to helping Apache produce binary > releases of Apache Hadoop that are so bullet proof that Yahoo and other > production Hadoop users can run them unpatched on their clusters. > > Until Hadoop 0.20, Yahoo committers worked as release masters to produce > binary Apache Hadoop releases that the entire community used on their > clusters. As the community grew, we have experiment with using the > "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" as the vehicle to share our work. > Unfortunately, Apache is no longer the obvious place to go for Hadoop > releases. The Yahoo! team wants to return to a world where anyone can > download and directly use releases of Hadoop from Apache. We want to > contribute to the stabilization and testing of those releases. We also want > to share our regular program of sustaining engineering that backports minor > feature enhancements into new dot releases on a regular basis, so that the > world sees regular improvements coming from Apache every few months, not > years. > > Recently the Apache Hadoop community has been very turbulent. Over the > last few months we have been developing Hadoop enhancements in our internal > git repository while doing a complete review of our options. Our commitment > to open sourcing our work was never in doubt (see http://yhoo.it/e8p3Dd), > but the future of the "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop" was far from clear. > We've concluded that focusing on Apache Hadoop is the way forward. We > believe that more focus on communicating our goals to the Apache Hadoop > community, and more willingness to compromise on how we get to those goals, > will help us get back to making Hadoop even better. > > Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several > person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git > repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our > sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. > Hadoop-0.20-sustaining is the stable version of Hadoop we currently run on > Yahoo's 40,000 nodes. It contains a series of fixes and enhancements that > are all backwards compatible with our "Hadoop 0.20 with security". It is > our most stable and high performance release of Hadoop ever. We've expended > a lot of energy finding and fixing bugs in it this year. We have initiated > the process of contributing this work to Apache in the branch: > hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security. We've proposed calling this > the 20.100 release. Once folks have had a chance to try this out and we've > had a chance to respond to their feedback, we plan to create 20.100 release > candidates and ask the community to vote on making them Apache releases. > > Hadoop-future is our new feature branch. We are working on a set of new > features for Hadoop to improve its availability, scalability and > interoperability to make Hadoop more usable in mission critical deployments. > You're going to see another burst of email activity from us as we work to > get hadoop-future patches socialized, reviewed and checked in. These bulk > checkins are exceptional. They are the result of us striving to be more > transparent. Once we've merged our hadoop-future and hadoop-0.20-sustaining > work back into Apache, folks can expect us to return to our regular > development cadence. Looking forward, we plan to socialize our roadmaps > regularly, actively synchronize our work with other active Hadoop > contributors and develop our code collaboratively, directly in Apache. > > In summary, our decision to discontinue the "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" > is a commitment to working more effectively with the Apache Hadoop > community. Our goal is to make Apache Hadoop THE open source platform for > big data. > > Thanks, > > E14 > > -- > > PS Here is a draft list of key features in hadoop-future: > > * HDFS-1052 - Federation, the ability to support much more storage per > Hadoop cluster. > > * HADOOP-6728 - A the new metrics framework > > * MAPREDUCE-1220 - Optimizations for small jobs > > --- > PPS This is cross-posted on our blog: http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W --000e0cd307c6ed54e3049b3057f6-- From general-return-2925-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 05:37:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84253 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 05:37:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 05:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14830 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 05:37:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14348 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 05:37:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14340 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 05:37:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:37:23 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6739279bwz.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:37:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Fk1dd4RHSmAiGwYYf5UlbUexJBaQpdJPHdJTobfJfZQ=; b=ZWmeV1R3bNU8nLEIGNuJV8djp1CjFuATVI0XpeLamqdEG7kqXSo/tQWS2Aln6H134M mraPkp2hUL/V6rfkXNP+05gKI7Dscy3PO+bxX+LJOfyvsU5BTuuB6ed1AnhTpHYa39t8 ZM01MpBtv+uxriEEZIMlka6r+1r5Mff8fonT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=sVRQNQCjZ8EFOwJe/psIhuI0tKNZKimdGRL9tUkFRP4RNvOe1aODfz0wKNY2GgCyYi nq+tdFQh/A8F7Zgze9Pga8B70ms6A+J1tTuSXzt98lmMxYEWujXq7G0yLTCN/eslp3No 5SkS6f7x/XD/wYBZZ/YQrUaoRloLiMvl3tP/s= Received: by 10.204.117.77 with SMTP id p13mr6302927bkq.19.1296538622086; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:37:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:36:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com> References: <5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:36:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MRUnit To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d647db01cf22049b31eca9 --0016e6d647db01cf22049b31eca9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 - thanks for taking the initiative to clean this up! You should file a JIRA with a patch that removes src/contrib/mrunit and removes it from src/contrib/build.xml. - Aaron On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. I just started a thread on moving all components out of contrib. > > nige > > On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > > >> > >> I think it makes sense to remove mrunit from contrib (after a > >> deprecation period) but I'm curious to hear others' opinions. > > > > > > Oh please do take things out of contrib. I'd love to see all of it move > to > > Github. Thanks for putting in the time for MRUnit. > > --0016e6d647db01cf22049b31eca9-- From general-return-2926-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 05:42:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88962 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 05:42:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 05:42:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16325 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 05:42:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16120 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 05:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16110 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 05:42:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:42:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:42:29 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so6741486bwz.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:42:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=P/GBWX/OGYVgWqEw3AEGi0c/7Es2H9hQlnAmSwxMLH0=; b=LBTA4U/hg3yYqNBEZMz8xCrvMVYLYruJdaGqz66b1RwpAlOesj3CnL1r1d5xpLHAvx Xj5YmLI/H2fG1nsoy80nGY/KHvYJVPvZrpXyoeZRmpvE60HPDhOzDzLVlkZYoUf/axhm jy7uG/VZTvE2ypvMPUy+2Svw/d1ZcglSWnZaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=EoS/8UKnZg+G8S5uUeLm1lBHUIksZXqyAQtvgoKE3Yf6xgFoKJqz39RqIelfkfz2uW w9tZas24WlyZMuJKvqrRZjY4TFS2EQd82KFUAoL1e5KcuEWi2opQTbwF9piZ3c4jfkFr MhgoJjBh9MKGAijNWw3HxIxpOeaxBk569DtBk= Received: by 10.204.84.32 with SMTP id h32mr6294281bkl.181.1296538927072; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:42:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:41:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:41:46 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7df5d2f869a049b31fe15 --0016e6d7df5d2f869a049b31fe15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 to this process in general. In particular, tools like MRUnit can benefit from having an independent release due to where they are used in a project's lifecycle. MRUnit should be specified as a test dependency, whereas Hadoop itself is a compile/runtime dependency. As it stands, there isn't an easy way to manage this. This would increase flexibility for this tool, probably for others as well. - Aaron On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > > > Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at > > least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of > > confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure > out > > which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of > > Hadoop they installed. > > > > > Indeed it creates confusion, but in my opinion it has been very successful > modulo that confusion. > > In particular, Kevin and I (who each have a repo on github but basically > co-maintain a branch) have done about 8 bugfix releases of LZO in the last > year. The ability to take a bug and turn it around into a release within a > few days has been very beneficial to the users. If it were part of core > Hadoop, people would be forced to live with these blocker bugs for months > at > a time between dot releases. > > IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate > release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also is > easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for a > wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core > components. I think this will also help the situation where people have set > up shop on branches -- a lot of the value of these branches comes from the > frequency of backports and bugfixes to "non-core" components. If the > non-core stuff were on a faster timeline upstream, we could maintain core > stability while also offering people the latest and greatest libraries, > tools, codecs, etc. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --0016e6d7df5d2f869a049b31fe15-- From general-return-2927-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 08:41:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60459 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 08:41:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 08:41:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 63834 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 08:41:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63488 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 08:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63480 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 08:41:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:41:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.48] (HELO mail-yi0-f48.google.com) (209.85.218.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:41:15 +0000 Received: by yib17 with SMTP id 17so2592407yib.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:40:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9dHFuPsOIcZT68Yl587Q+j6GhEJXr1Csct8J0qRp4QA=; b=OsCfTFLVOwWRaBf9BmatLJBVrSonhnuRf+3yIk5SQbACAnjANNiLFwc6GJTs75gKBb mb3ceqYBdUsy7aH/Cy8IPFNLiJI1KrOHYFAWLXBb4or/PhSc1tmNtU1Kqy30KXhgl04r uDvmgQWaN7WfgbSc5FnJPOPT5OsWrdrwtbevg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=A/1KaPcQJ+4f3AqKefTOklxHA3Ud1APCfbrkYPE75ljhOKGngapFgmis008uD5QXgI UIXRVZKLAD+dwaKx7hbzvZFy/lo6kaRb7nWDN7MQd9gcfDY80CeOxuOQ+BpGJ116uEni oJNQoRqFd7vCEa+nK2Jb/n0Gc1cpe2vzJd/J8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.109.168 with SMTP id s28mr14991203yhg.74.1296549654483; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:40:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:40:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8b4396d647049b347d88 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023547c8b4396d647049b347d88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Giri, Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. It is complaining that 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? --Konstantin On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Konstantin, > > I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For > now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. > > Thanks, > Giri > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > Giri > > looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. > > Any thoughts on what's going on? > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > > wrote: > > > >> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven > >> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. > >> > >> For settings.xml template pls look at > >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > >> > >> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. > >> > >> -Giri > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> > >>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile > >>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are > >>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel > >>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past > >>> them. > >>> -Jakob > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>> wrote: > >>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. > >> Try to > >>>> build trunk. > >>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by > >> HADOOP-6904 > >>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. > >>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. > >>>> > >>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because > Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > >>>> build is broken. See here. > >>>> > >> > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > >>>> > >>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated > >>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be > >> digested > >>>> by Hudson since then. > >>>> > >>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is > caused > >> by > >>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> --Konstantin > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is > the > >> one > >>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that > the > >>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the > tale > >> I > >>>>> heard from infra. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey Konstantin, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > >>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > >>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the > upstream > >>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Eli > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > >>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > >>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > >>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think > >>>>> those > >>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > >>>>>>> restored promptly. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > >>>>> emails. > >>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > >>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > >>>>>> mapreduce > >>>>>>>> both not compiling. > >>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. > >>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > >>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... > >> a.out > >>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting > >>>>>>>> Build was aborted > >>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > >>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc > >>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts > >>>>>>>> Recording test results > >>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints > >>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated > >>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... > >>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > >>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. > >>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > --0023547c8b4396d647049b347d88-- From general-return-2928-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 09:01:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65540 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 09:01:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 09:01:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 85652 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 09:01:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85262 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 09:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85254 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 09:01:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:01:37 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=YbTTAQxtLaRem/4VmZulRSeCgGpm3gspfZyOjse++LZvDGZeqaJ4nft9 mLBUgybtpO7vGo0aAXkyZ/R/A0nnufPdPCsfzozQxXqPNhZ/cH+inwfV9 16NWxAJVSgaWfSw; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1296550895; x=1328086895; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20Move=20common,=20hdfs,=20ma preduce=20contrib=20components=20to=0D=0A=20apache-extras .org=20or=20elsewhere|Date:=20Tue,=201=20Feb=202011=2009: 02:26=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20" "=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=+r1zeD3otkmm9dy7ZBv2AXeM0MKaW1CmgeNnibBPH+w=; b=kDIn/QwQEXeU2PVamhS7AUfFcLy6muenQwV+WZRhKYq9ZaPC1DrG4dPm mLWgtKZ0pfZJbpqR6qobOzkLPmBvPeho420G0J7/kA9mrOnAvU5BvynBr pzy0c/NHv7tvwph; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,409,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="19688688" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 01:02:27 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Index: AQHLwPkf34Q5Zjm8NkummeRbbY5xTJPrMnYAgAENWQCAAKGEgA== Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:02:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >=20 >>=20 >> Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at >> least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of >> confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure o= ut >> which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of >> Hadoop they installed. >>=20 >>=20 > Indeed it creates confusion, but in my opinion it has been very successfu= l > modulo that confusion. I'm not sure how the above works with what you wrote below: > In particular, Kevin and I (who each have a repo on github but basically > co-maintain a branch) have done about 8 bugfix releases of LZO in the las= t > year. The ability to take a bug and turn it around into a release within = a > few days has been very beneficial to the users. If it were part of core > Hadoop, people would be forced to live with these blocker bugs for months= at > a time between dot releases. So is the expectation that users would have to follow bread crumbs to the = github dumping ground, then try to figure out which repo is the 'better' ch= oice for their usage? Using LZO as an example, it appears we have a choic= e of kevin's, your's, or the master without even taking into consideration = any tags. That sounds like a recipe for disaster that's even worse than wha= t we have today. > IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate > release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also i= s > easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for = a > wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core > components. I'd agree except for one thing: even when users do provide patches to con= trib components we ignore them. How long have those patches for HOD been s= itting there in the patch queue? So of course they wait months/years--beca= use we seemingly ignore anything that isn't important to us. Unfortunately= , that covers a large chunk of contrib. :( From general-return-2929-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 09:15:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77804 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 09:15:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 09:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4919 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 09:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4529 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 09:15:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4521 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 09:15:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:15:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.128.214.242] (HELO magdalenammc.nazwa.pl) (85.128.214.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:15:01 +0000 Received: from Pavilionl (unknown [62.233.208.194]) by magdalenammc.nazwa.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A00A30CA4F6 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:14:40 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Magdalena_Moll-Musia=B3?= To: Subject: Job opportunities - 2 roles with Hadoop Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:14:39 +0100 Message-ID: <003d01cbc1f0$7436eea0$5ca4cbe0$@com.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003E_01CBC1F8.D5FB56A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcvB8HQDJHO3GhBXRj2MhndJcoGyRQ== Content-Language: pl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01CBC1F8.D5FB56A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, =20 I am looking for experienced candidates to join Nokia in Berlin. =20 Please follow the links to read the descriptions of the roles: =20 http://www.mm-consulting.com.pl/senior-software-engineer---machine-learni= ng. html http://www.mm-consulting.com.pl/analitics.html =20 Your CVs are more than welcome J=20 Pease provide me with your CV in English and please suggest when I could call you to discuss the opportunity (15 minutes conversation). =20 In case of questions, please let me know. =20 Best regards, Magda=20 =20 ______________________________________ mmConsulting Magdalena Moll-Musia=B3 recruitment partner=20 +48 516 340 127 office@mm-consulting.com.pl www.mm-consulting.com.pl =20 ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01CBC1F8.D5FB56A0-- From general-return-2930-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 14:04:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51888 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 14:04:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 14:04:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 15979 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 14:04:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15539 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 14:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15531 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 14:04:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:04:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:04:38 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so6935947qwe.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:04:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=mMpmDxE3BDd70BDsoNLHZRtdbNJTzqxhMfUqDe0K01o=; b=Ig/HW01BmxYbAf+N2fC+stTdnAeXZHHT3GfZ8zPT5MLPkqlf21FB3xvTYPPcigF24q ag6nJNsrYhfPonaU0TRl63K3cLIkrF+OmRxBAGSZsYNkLWCErtTfEr/Wo6P7SCpJ/aBA HaQZ492tcbSVUGkVCMmqGhSNKg7wFXNMIjQA4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=TBaku7Fq0bEQf0AL+GIggHGyF3DISikm3fbLgDzlx1fQHYFdacyZViLBej9iroWIrs pqlNacPXkrZdkQrfjwfn/MpHj0N6ZclW7hYfUvhm6G/vbGra/rfMAlVH7ByDPt9KxMxe C7zjS4gy8dZ389Sq72NcwKRFwQMLVmxwYcl3c= Received: by 10.229.235.202 with SMTP id kh10mr5429976qcb.194.1296569057426; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:04:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.9] (h-64-236-128-41.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p13sm15615108qcu.17.2011.02.01.06.04.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:04:16 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:04:15 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0C3025FB-DDCF-4572-B90B-6AD07A134293@Holsman.NET> References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Congratulations Eric. this is fantastic news. On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Folks, >=20 > I'm pleased to announce that after some reflection, Yahoo! has decided = to discontinue the "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" and focus on = Apache Hadoop. We plan to remove all references to a Yahoo distribution = from our website (developer.yahoo.com/hadoop), close our github repo = (yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common) and focus on working more closely with = the Apache community. Our intent is to return to helping Apache produce = binary releases of Apache Hadoop that are so bullet proof that Yahoo and = other production Hadoop users can run them unpatched on their clusters. >=20 > Until Hadoop 0.20, Yahoo committers worked as release masters to = produce binary Apache Hadoop releases that the entire community used on = their clusters. As the community grew, we have experiment with using = the "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" as the vehicle to share our work. = Unfortunately, Apache is no longer the obvious place to go for Hadoop = releases. The Yahoo! team wants to return to a world where anyone can = download and directly use releases of Hadoop from Apache. We want to = contribute to the stabilization and testing of those releases. We also = want to share our regular program of sustaining engineering that = backports minor feature enhancements into new dot releases on a regular = basis, so that the world sees regular improvements coming from Apache = every few months, not years. >=20 > Recently the Apache Hadoop community has been very turbulent. Over = the last few months we have been developing Hadoop enhancements in our = internal git repository while doing a complete review of our options. = Our commitment to open sourcing our work was never in doubt (see = http://yhoo.it/e8p3Dd), but the future of the "Yahoo distribution of = Hadoop" was far from clear. We've concluded that focusing on Apache = Hadoop is the way forward. We believe that more focus on communicating = our goals to the Apache Hadoop community, and more willingness to = compromise on how we get to those goals, will help us get back to making = Hadoop even better. >=20 > Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several = person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git = repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our = sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. = Hadoop-0.20-sustaining is the stable version of Hadoop we currently run = on Yahoo's 40,000 nodes. It contains a series of fixes and enhancements = that are all backwards compatible with our "Hadoop 0.20 with security". = It is our most stable and high performance release of Hadoop ever. = We've expended a lot of energy finding and fixing bugs in it this year. = We have initiated the process of contributing this work to Apache in the = branch: hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security. We've proposed = calling this the 20.100 release. Once folks have had a chance to try = this out and we've had a chance to respond to their feedback, we plan to = create 20.100 release candidates and ask the community to vote on making = them Apache releases.=20 >=20 > Hadoop-future is our new feature branch. We are working on a set of = new features for Hadoop to improve its availability, scalability and = interoperability to make Hadoop more usable in mission critical = deployments. You're going to see another burst of email activity from us = as we work to get hadoop-future patches socialized, reviewed and checked = in. These bulk checkins are exceptional. They are the result of us = striving to be more transparent. Once we've merged our hadoop-future = and hadoop-0.20-sustaining work back into Apache, folks can expect us to = return to our regular development cadence. Looking forward, we plan to = socialize our roadmaps regularly, actively synchronize our work with = other active Hadoop contributors and develop our code collaboratively, = directly in Apache. >=20 > In summary, our decision to discontinue the "Yahoo! Distribution of = Hadoop" is a commitment to working more effectively with the Apache = Hadoop community. Our goal is to make Apache Hadoop THE open source = platform for big data. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > E14 >=20 > -- >=20 > PS Here is a draft list of key features in hadoop-future: >=20 > * HDFS-1052 - Federation, the ability to support much more storage per = Hadoop cluster. >=20 > * HADOOP-6728 - A the new metrics framework >=20 > * MAPREDUCE-1220 - Optimizations for small jobs >=20 > --- > PPS This is cross-posted on our blog: http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W From general-return-2931-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 16:07:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38498 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 16:07:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 16:07:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 32460 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32019 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32011 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 16:07:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:07:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:07:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.199] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c156.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.156]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p11G6M4R084229 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:06:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1296576390; bh=kEKjDdHb/78L6bwya9E00YaPq/pBIxGokz52rkQ/Ey0=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=sZYnuaQtQhO9Cy2/zQ712N7ImqducHMldTcf+sLCELYhfNmaqe+4O0msluS42UoBR zYl8uhFfJwAn3GY34rrAs74m5lIKxU0Iny45oY6aY/ww3Z1S3aYBSfE3VrCOcca2XE xcBB2fhX+t+WTufIT07ZdRJ4aWNLIqyLpjoyetPo= Message-Id: From: Alan Gates To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:06:22 -0800 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We will be proposing Howl as an Incubator project soon. Alan. On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Excellent news! Will you also make Howl, Oozie, and Yarn Apache > projects as > well? > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm pleased to announce that after some reflection, Yahoo! has >> decided to >> discontinue the "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" and focus on >> Apache >> Hadoop. We plan to remove all references to a Yahoo distribution >> from our >> website (developer.yahoo.com/hadoop), close our github repo ( >> yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common) and focus on working more closely >> with the >> Apache community. Our intent is to return to helping Apache >> produce binary >> releases of Apache Hadoop that are so bullet proof that Yahoo and >> other >> production Hadoop users can run them unpatched on their clusters. >> >> Until Hadoop 0.20, Yahoo committers worked as release masters to >> produce >> binary Apache Hadoop releases that the entire community used on their >> clusters. As the community grew, we have experiment with using the >> "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" as the vehicle to share our work. >> Unfortunately, Apache is no longer the obvious place to go for Hadoop >> releases. The Yahoo! team wants to return to a world where anyone >> can >> download and directly use releases of Hadoop from Apache. We want to >> contribute to the stabilization and testing of those releases. We >> also want >> to share our regular program of sustaining engineering that >> backports minor >> feature enhancements into new dot releases on a regular basis, so >> that the >> world sees regular improvements coming from Apache every few >> months, not >> years. >> >> Recently the Apache Hadoop community has been very turbulent. Over >> the >> last few months we have been developing Hadoop enhancements in our >> internal >> git repository while doing a complete review of our options. Our >> commitment >> to open sourcing our work was never in doubt (see http://yhoo.it/e8p3Dd) >> , >> but the future of the "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop" was far from >> clear. >> We've concluded that focusing on Apache Hadoop is the way forward. >> We >> believe that more focus on communicating our goals to the Apache >> Hadoop >> community, and more willingness to compromise on how we get to >> those goals, >> will help us get back to making Hadoop even better. >> >> Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several >> person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git >> repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our >> sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. >> Hadoop-0.20-sustaining is the stable version of Hadoop we currently >> run on >> Yahoo's 40,000 nodes. It contains a series of fixes and >> enhancements that >> are all backwards compatible with our "Hadoop 0.20 with security". >> It is >> our most stable and high performance release of Hadoop ever. We've >> expended >> a lot of energy finding and fixing bugs in it this year. We have >> initiated >> the process of contributing this work to Apache in the branch: >> hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security. We've proposed >> calling this >> the 20.100 release. Once folks have had a chance to try this out >> and we've >> had a chance to respond to their feedback, we plan to create 20.100 >> release >> candidates and ask the community to vote on making them Apache >> releases. >> >> Hadoop-future is our new feature branch. We are working on a set >> of new >> features for Hadoop to improve its availability, scalability and >> interoperability to make Hadoop more usable in mission critical >> deployments. >> You're going to see another burst of email activity from us as we >> work to >> get hadoop-future patches socialized, reviewed and checked in. >> These bulk >> checkins are exceptional. They are the result of us striving to be >> more >> transparent. Once we've merged our hadoop-future and hadoop-0.20- >> sustaining >> work back into Apache, folks can expect us to return to our regular >> development cadence. Looking forward, we plan to socialize our >> roadmaps >> regularly, actively synchronize our work with other active Hadoop >> contributors and develop our code collaboratively, directly in >> Apache. >> >> In summary, our decision to discontinue the "Yahoo! Distribution of >> Hadoop" >> is a commitment to working more effectively with the Apache Hadoop >> community. Our goal is to make Apache Hadoop THE open source >> platform for >> big data. >> >> Thanks, >> >> E14 >> >> -- >> >> PS Here is a draft list of key features in hadoop-future: >> >> * HDFS-1052 - Federation, the ability to support much more storage >> per >> Hadoop cluster. >> >> * HADOOP-6728 - A the new metrics framework >> >> * MAPREDUCE-1220 - Optimizations for small jobs >> >> --- >> PPS This is cross-posted on our blog: http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W From general-return-2932-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 16:11:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39772 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 16:11:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 16:11:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 43237 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42966 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42953 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 16:11:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:11:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.17.10] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.17.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:11:25 +0000 Received: from office1.lan.sumadev.de (dslb-084-059-076-183.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.59.76.183]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LkknQ-1QKk203v76-00aRdN; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:10:57 +0100 Received: from [192.168.5.106] (dslb-084-059-076-183.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.59.76.183]) by office1.lan.sumadev.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BDF455F701 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:10:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: [ANN] Plasma MapReduce, PlasmaFS, version 0.3 From: Gerd Stolpmann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:10:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1296576655.24058.101.camel@thinkpad> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:VzzLd84NUSy8Aze4b5btkGPUdU/ffsbaAcE+ELYn2XG 2sIauN9WiGoUCGUCZWmNWXjyidpHKAkAtXQGQUY5YrHJmerTgq RnJqDo+dx6lQscw2vQ1exh1fv7o3qr/uZeJvWMpWMQSoHBkSIa ME1QJhUzh9qgyPpG1OhPxPm2By/kT7OwZmsnH6/4W3oEaGppN0 vVm2G2cobAmKkY1+G9ubQ== Hi, This is about the release of Plasma-0.3, an alternate and independent implementation of map/reduce with its own dfs. This might also be interesting for Hadoop users and developers, because this project incorporates a number of new ideas. So far, Plasma works on smaller clusters and shows good signs of being scalable. HA support is still very incomplete. -- Plasma consists of two parts (for now), namely Plasma MapReduce, a map/reduce compute framework, and PlasmaFS, the underlying distributed filesystem. Major changes in version 0.3 : * Optimized blocklist representation (extent-based) * Improved block allocator to minimize disk seeks * Allocating datanode access tickets in advance * Sophisticated RAM management * The command-line utility "plasma" supports wildcards Of course, there are also numerous bug fixes and performance improvements. Plasma MapReduce is a distributed implementation of the map/reduce algorithm scheme written in Ocaml. PlasmaFS is the underlying distributed filesystem, also written in Ocaml. Especially the PlasmaFS approach has numerous differences compared to HDFS: * Data blocks are preallocated, and PlasmaFS takes care of block placement * Blocklists are extent-based * Metadata is stored in a PostgreSQL db * 2-phase commit is used to distribute the metadata db * the full set of file access functions is supported, including random writes * file accesses can be transaction-based * shared memory can be used for speeding up the data path to locally stored data blocks * we _think_ it is not possible to corrupt the namenode by accident or by crashes * PlasmaFS volumes can be directly mounted via NFS * PlasmaFS uses ONCRPC as protocol and not home-grown protocols (and one of the next releases will add security via GSS-API) * We got rid of multi-threading There is no need that user programs are written in Ocaml, as Plasma also support a streaming mode. Both pieces of software are bundled together in one download. The project page with further links is http://projects.camlcity.org/projects/plasma.html There is now also a homepage at http://plasma.camlcity.org This is an early alpha release (0.3). A lot of things work already, and you can already run distributed map/reduce jobs. However, it is in no way complete. Plasma is installable via GODI for Ocaml 3.12. For discussions on specifics of Plasma there is a separate mailing list: https://godirepo.camlcity.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-list Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann, Bad Nauheimer Str.3, 64289 Darmstadt,Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Phone: +49-6151-153855 Fax: +49-6151-997714 ------------------------------------------------------------ From general-return-2933-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 16:29:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48322 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 16:29:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 16:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 88098 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:29:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87736 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 16:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87727 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 16:29:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:29:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.202] (HELO nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:29:35 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.191] by nm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2011 16:29:13 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.138] by tm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2011 16:29:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2011 16:29:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 755594.7991.bm@omp1021.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 23456 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Feb 2011 16:29:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296577753; bh=Kj4O3evh0hKXzIH7ESZ0SJbY2vL8QXqylDiuoekSMK0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zLKnpqceNnIc9fzlREmzpZ7RvIF/mYAZDIgAZIYw24eQw0+0KIE90viEsqG5ZWNcWijMymv5k8JtFHegTrPggEI9zZ76wr6wTNBeRMSZ1UCfMr7XpPTqFueTB4251ebmLeEgJ+jrbiF9HtrG6rJ4+WRgyFwhxVc5w+Cl27tMnsA= Message-ID: <446576.23201.qm@web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1xPbKKkVM1mVeGod0XAJs.VqZQ.sZYHKZJkjOMo5QMYt25I rAhVgqkuvoT2SFWDcSojKMB9sVGam.90GNhRA8k6eIh9BwaC409Jg33AmlWw snjfj2GEBzt8qwWVP7qagdK66IfnlJxItqH4TPDKlQa.q4Nf6P56oAOpP7OV FY5.uEf8AiK8tAnx_cqxPE2UlpBHaFNyIJSwxbmPmHe6UbRfn.irCUiafUXd xUgVFKp4Fm46mZkw1KxxNAOT7utKSX.KA0BKFY63rxHuEpSMOjYf3YZ7OKQg WEibBucq87CNFUnKE__jywxAsz3qkFFVbE62uWb3cGlK5Uvb0tL1LaABW7Lh By36ANpGsse_jhpj_0tu0BxjTsRqf9VaR._L2KZJ70x8i.X3mx7nxWbon8fm MlbcCfcUAvnc- Received: from [68.123.236.97] by web65501.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:29:12 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:29:12 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Alan Gates > > We will be proposing Howl as an Incubator project soon. That would be excellent. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) From general-return-2934-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 17:37:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83485 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 17:37:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 17:37:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 21814 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21400 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 17:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21382 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 17:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom@cloudera.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:37:33 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so7246211wye.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:37:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.19.139 with SMTP id n11mr5973052wen.78.1296581831258; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:37:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.38.16 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:37:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:37:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for the reasons already cited: independent release cycles, testing/build problems, lack of maintenance, etc. I think we should strongly discourage new contrib components in favour of Apache Extras or github, remove inactive contrib components, and also allow maintainers to move components out if they volunteer to. HBase moved all its contrib components out of the main tree a few months back - can anyone comment how that worked out? I agree that we should move streaming (MAPREDUCE-602) and the schedulers to the main codebase. With work like MAPREDUCE-1478 we can put these components into a library tree so that the libraries can depend on core, but core doesn't depend on the libraries. Milind: Record IO is in Common (in the main tree, not a contrib component), and was deprecated in 0.21.0. We could remove it in a future release. Cheers, Tom On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wro= te: >> >>> >>> Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at >>> least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of >>> confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure = out >>> which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version o= f >>> Hadoop they installed. >>> >>> >> Indeed it creates confusion, but in my opinion it has been very successf= ul >> modulo that confusion. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I'm not sure how the above works with what you wrote below= : > >> In particular, Kevin and I (who each have a repo on github but basically >> co-maintain a branch) have done about 8 bugfix releases of LZO in the la= st >> year. The ability to take a bug and turn it around into a release within= a >> few days has been very beneficial to the users. If it were part of core >> Hadoop, people would be forced to live with these blocker bugs for month= s at >> a time between dot releases. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0So is the expectation that users would have to follow brea= d crumbs to the github dumping ground, then try to figure out which repo is= the 'better' choice for their usage? =A0 Using LZO as an example, it appea= rs we have a choice of kevin's, your's, or the master without even taking i= nto consideration any tags. That sounds like a recipe for disaster that's e= ven worse than what we have today. > > >> IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate >> release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also = is >> easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for= a >> wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core >> components. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I'd agree except for one thing: =A0even when users do prov= ide patches to contrib components we ignore them. =A0How long have those pa= tches for HOD been sitting there in the patch queue? =A0So of course they w= ait months/years--because we seemingly ignore anything that isn't important= to us. =A0Unfortunately, that covers a large chunk of contrib. :( > > > From general-return-2935-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 17:51:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89218 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 17:50:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 17:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 60244 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 17:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59970 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59959 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 17:50:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:50:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom@cloudera.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:50:49 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so3241693ewy.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:50:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.25.136 with SMTP id z8mr909866wez.93.1296582627660; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.38.16 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:50:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D46DC4A.7040700@apache.org> References: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> <4D46DC4A.7040700@apache.org> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:50:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Compatibility From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 FWIW the FileSystemContractBaseTest class and the FileContext*BaseTest classes (and their concrete subclasses) are probably the closest thing we have to compatibility tests for FileSystem and FileContext implementations in Hadoop. Tom On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 31/01/11 14:32, Chris Douglas wrote: >> >> Steve- >> >> It's hard to answer without more concrete criteria. Is this a >> trademark question affecting the marketing of a product? A >> cross-compatibility taxonomy for users? The minimum criteria to >> publish a paper/release a product without eye-rolling? The particular >> compatibility claims made by a system will be nuanced and specific; a >> runtime that executes MapReduce jobs as they would run in Hadoop can >> simply make that claim, whether it uses parts of MapReduce, HDFS, or >> neither. > > No, I'm thinking more about what large scale tests are needed to be run > against the codebase before you can say "it works", and then how to say some > changes means that it still works. > >> >> For the various distributions "Powered by Apache Hadoop," one would >> assume that compatibility will vary depending on the featureset and >> the audience. A distribution that runs MapReduce applications >> as-written for Apache Hadoop may be incompatible with a user's >> deployed metrics/monitoring system. Some random script to scrape the >> UI may not work. The product may only scale to 20 nodes. Whether these >> are "compatible with Apache Hadoop" is awkward to answer generally, >> unless we want to define the semantics of that phrase by policy. >> >> To put it bluntly, why would we bother to define such a policy? One >> could assert that a fully-compatible system would implement all the >> public/stable APIs as defined in HADOOP-5073, but who would that help? >> And though interoperability is certainly relevant to systems built on >> top of Hadoop, is there a reason the Apache project needs to be >> involved in defining the standards for compatibility among them? > > Agreed, I'm just thinking about namings and definitions. Even with the > stable/unstable internal/external split, there's still the question as to > what the semantics of operations are, both explicit (this operation does X) > and implicit (and it takes less than Y seconds to do it). It's those > implicit things that always catch you out (indeed, they are the argument > points in things like Java and Java EE compatibility test kits) > From general-return-2936-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 19:28:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65661 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 19:28:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 19:28:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 80685 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:28:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80578 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:28:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80566 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 19:28:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:28:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:27:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p11JRR0U082137 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:27:27 -0800 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:27:25 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Topic: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Index: AcvCRg7fOtFpj/qCSJa4hg5ZsiYl7g== Message-ID: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Konstantin, trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target are succ= essful. The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time config= uration. It was set to 30mins. I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on fine=20 https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-tru= nk-Commit Thanks, Giri On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Giri, >=20 > Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. > It is complaining that > 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' > Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? >=20 > --Konstantin >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > wrote: >=20 >> Konstantin, >>=20 >> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. F= or >> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Giri >>=20 >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>=20 >>> Giri >>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous one= s. >>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>> Thanks, >>> --Konstantin >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven >>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xm= l. >>>>=20 >>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>=20 >>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>=20 >>>> -Giri >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile >>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are >>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel >>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past >>>>> them. >>>>> -Jakob >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment= . >>>> Try to >>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-= trunk-Commit/ >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be >>>> digested >>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is >> caused >>>> by >>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning >>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is >> the >>>> one >>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that >> the >>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the >> tale >>>> I >>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins >> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each othe= r >>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the >> upstream >>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I thin= k >>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs an= d >>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.= class)] >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_= security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2937-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 19:45:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72138 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 19:45:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 19:45:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 7128 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6921 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:45:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6913 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 19:45:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:45:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:44:54 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so2922579gwj.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=disa3L/y0GzF+xVYZS25feS1FoOwvSkblGulAvTcWzY=; b=bVICb4r6ypazY3KSzikg6wGwseQ+aAUzUrSORAuUumqwA61bXSD6Ilb9ftva7cz9Fw VGRXapxhaGk4Hzixve0Q51jaJjwh8YmtRUrIQjWU+luQySP/vfkisqocFdXprAnaXjVT KmpENiOw83O+ka7q8KujYSQpubu0b4ndABlSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=a85oki+hbp1QhMdQDv4gWAETq93adW/GzrnLVpGIIYXLRzCmsrPuJFcnZI9LvPgOE1 RlShyfDbYVwhmGJhUsrYvvpjOImAGCmdwnMVC7qTcENjHpFAVwELh/lEJeqJN7++cAnW zJ+MknmFCxk5avMnN0FzZDL/FKdxysjgi2kSs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.180 with SMTP id f40mr16748733yhg.0.1296589473385; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:44:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:44:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023543a2748fb173f049b3dc226 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023543a2748fb173f049b3dc226 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Giri, Thanks a lot for fixing this. I see it is working now. --Konstantin On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Konstantin, > > trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target are > successful. > > The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time > configuration. It was set to 30mins. > I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on fine > > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > > > Thanks, > Giri > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > Giri, > > > > Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > > There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. > > It is complaining that > > 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' > > Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? > > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > > wrote: > > > >> Konstantin, > >> > >> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. > For > >> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Giri > >> > >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> > >>> Giri > >>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous > ones. > >>> Any thoughts on what's going on? > >>> Thanks, > >>> --Konstantin > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven > >>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in > ~/.m2/settings.xml. > >>>> > >>>> For settings.xml template pls look at > >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > >>>> > >>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. > >>>> > >>>> -Giri > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile > >>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are > >>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel > >>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past > >>>>> them. > >>>>> -Jakob > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the > moment. > >>>> Try to > >>>>>> build trunk. > >>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by > >>>> HADOOP-6904 > >>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. > >>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because > >> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > >>>>>> build is broken. See here. > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated > >>>>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be > >>>> digested > >>>>>> by Hudson since then. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is > >> caused > >>>> by > >>>>>> HADOOP-6864. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning > > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is > >> the > >>>> one > >>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that > >> the > >>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the > >> tale > >>>> I > >>>>>>> heard from infra. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > >>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each > other > >>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the > >> upstream > >>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Eli > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > >>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > >>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > >>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I > think > >>>>>>> those > >>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > >>>>>>>>> restored promptly. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > >>>>>>> emails. > >>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > >>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs > and > >>>>>>>> mapreduce > >>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. > >>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. > >>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > >>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... > >>>> a.out > >>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting > >>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted > >>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > >>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc > >>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts > >>>>>>>>>> Recording test results > >>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints > >>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated > >>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... > >>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > >>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. > >>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > --0023543a2748fb173f049b3dc226-- From general-return-2938-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 19:47:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72941 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 19:47:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 19:47:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 11642 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11587 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11579 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 19:47:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:47:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:47:17 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so7048815iyb.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:46:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.84 with SMTP id fx20mr8736689ibb.62.1296589616524; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:46:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.19 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:46:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:46:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fc514832ec9049b3dcb5a --90e6ba4fc514832ec9049b3dcb5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > So is the expectation that users would have to follow bread crumbs > to the github dumping ground, then try to figure out which repo is the > 'better' choice for their usage? Using LZO as an example, it appears we > have a choice of kevin's, your's, or the master without even taking into > consideration any tags. That sounds like a recipe for disaster that's even > worse than what we have today. > > Kevin's and mine are currently identical (0e7005136e4160ed4cc157c4ddd7f4f1c6e11ffa) Not sure who "the master" is -- maybe you're referring to the Google Code repo? The reason we started working on github over a year ago is that the bugs we reported (and provided diffs for) in the Google Code project were ignored. For example: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/issues/detail?id=17 In fact this repo hasn't been updated since Sep '09: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/source/list Github provided an excellent place to collaborate on the project, make progress, fix bugs, and provide a better product for the users. As for "dumping ground," I don't quite follow your point - we develop in the open, accept pull requests from users, and code review each others' changes. Since October every commit has either been contributed by or fixes a bug reported by a user completely outside of the organizations where Kevin and I work. I agree that it's a bit of "breadcrumb following" to find the repo, though. We do at least have a link on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/UsingLzoCompression which points to Kevin's repo. Perhaps the best solution here is to add a page to the official Hadoop site (not just the wiki) with links to actively maintained contrib projects? > > > IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate > > release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also > is > > easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for > a > > wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core > > components. > > I'd agree except for one thing: even when users do provide patches > to contrib components we ignore them. How long have those patches for HOD > been sitting there in the patch queue? So of course they wait > months/years--because we seemingly ignore anything that isn't important to > us. Unfortunately, that covers a large chunk of contrib. :( > True - we ignore them because the core contributors generally have little clue about the contrib components, so don't feel qualified to review. I'll happily admit that I've never run failmon, index, dynamic-scheduler, eclipse-plugin, data_join, mumak, or vertica contribs. Wouldn't you rather these components lived on github so the people who wrote them could update them as they wished without having to wait on committers who have little to no clue about how to evaluate the changes? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba4fc514832ec9049b3dcb5a-- From general-return-2939-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 19:54:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75726 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 19:54:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 19:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21408 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21160 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 19:54:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21147 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 19:54:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:54:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:54:50 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7604866iwn.35 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.84 with SMTP id fx20mr8746499ibb.62.1296590068666; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:54:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.19 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:54:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:54:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fc514765287049b3de63b --90e6ba4fc514765287049b3de63b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom White wrote: > > HBase moved all its contrib components out of the main tree a few > months back - can anyone comment how that worked out? > > Sure. For each contrib: ec2: no longer exists, and now has been integrated into Whirr and much improved. Whirr has made several releases in the time that HBase has made one. The whirr contributors know way more about cloud deployment than the HBase contributors (except where they happen to overlap). Strong net positive. mdc_replication: pulled into core since it's developed by core committers and also needs a fair amount of tight integration with core components stargate: pulled into core - it was only in contrib as a sort of staging ground - it's really an improved/new version of the "rest" interface we already had in core. transactional: moved to github - this has languished a bit on github because only one person was actively maintaining it. However, it had already been "languishing" as part of contrib - even though it compiled, it never really worked very well in HBase trunk. So, moving it to a place where it's languished has just made it more obvious what was already true - that it isn't a well supported component (yet). Recently it's been taken back up by the author of it - if it develops a large user base it can move quickly and evolve without waiting on our release. Net: probably a wash So, overall, I'd say it was a good decision. Though we never had the same number of contribs that Hadoop seems to have sprouted. -Todd > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at > >>> least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of > >>> confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure > out > >>> which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version > of > >>> Hadoop they installed. > >>> > >>> > >> Indeed it creates confusion, but in my opinion it has been very > successful > >> modulo that confusion. > > > > I'm not sure how the above works with what you wrote below: > > > >> In particular, Kevin and I (who each have a repo on github but basically > >> co-maintain a branch) have done about 8 bugfix releases of LZO in the > last > >> year. The ability to take a bug and turn it around into a release within > a > >> few days has been very beneficial to the users. If it were part of core > >> Hadoop, people would be forced to live with these blocker bugs for > months at > >> a time between dot releases. > > > > So is the expectation that users would have to follow bread crumbs > to the github dumping ground, then try to figure out which repo is the > 'better' choice for their usage? Using LZO as an example, it appears we > have a choice of kevin's, your's, or the master without even taking into > consideration any tags. That sounds like a recipe for disaster that's even > worse than what we have today. > > > > > >> IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate > >> release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also > is > >> easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for > a > >> wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core > >> components. > > > > I'd agree except for one thing: even when users do provide > patches to contrib components we ignore them. How long have those patches > for HOD been sitting there in the patch queue? So of course they wait > months/years--because we seemingly ignore anything that isn't important to > us. Unfortunately, that covers a large chunk of contrib. :( > > > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba4fc514765287049b3de63b-- From general-return-2940-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 01 22:03:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53033 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 22:03:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 22:03:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 96756 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 22:03:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96632 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 22:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96624 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 22:03:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:03:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:03:31 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p11M2sPg032056 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:02:54 -0800 From: Todd Papaioannou To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:02:51 -0800 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Thread-Index: AcvCW8aSawLxVZd6Q4i7ZYySA7QPOQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C96DC125467Ctoddpyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C96DC125467Ctoddpyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes. We have been and continue to be firm believers in Apache and the value= of Open Source software, as you can see from our track record to date of c= ontributing heavily to Hadoop and donating Pig, ZooKeeper, Avro, etc. We ar= e excited about their potential and we hope others will find them useful to= o. ToddP On 1/31/11 7:44 PM, "Jeff Hammerbacher" > wrote: Excellent news! Will you also make Howl, Oozie, and Yarn Apache projects as well? On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >wrote: Hi Folks, I'm pleased to announce that after some reflection, Yahoo! has decided to discontinue the "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" and focus on Apache Hadoop. We plan to remove all references to a Yahoo distribution from our website (developer.yahoo.com/hadoop), close our github repo ( yahoo.github.com/hadoop-common) and focus on working more closely with the Apache community. Our intent is to return to helping Apache produce binary releases of Apache Hadoop that are so bullet proof that Yahoo and other production Hadoop users can run them unpatched on their clusters. Until Hadoop 0.20, Yahoo committers worked as release masters to produce binary Apache Hadoop releases that the entire community used on their clusters. As the community grew, we have experiment with using the "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" as the vehicle to share our work. Unfortunately, Apache is no longer the obvious place to go for Hadoop releases. The Yahoo! team wants to return to a world where anyone can download and directly use releases of Hadoop from Apache. We want to contribute to the stabilization and testing of those releases. We also wan= t to share our regular program of sustaining engineering that backports minor feature enhancements into new dot releases on a regular basis, so that the world sees regular improvements coming from Apache every few months, not years. Recently the Apache Hadoop community has been very turbulent. Over the last few months we have been developing Hadoop enhancements in our internal git repository while doing a complete review of our options. Our commitment to open sourcing our work was never in doubt (see http://yhoo.it/e8p3Dd), but the future of the "Yahoo distribution of Hadoop" was far from clear. We've concluded that focusing on Apache Hadoop is the way forward. We believe that more focus on communicating our goals to the Apache Hadoop community, and more willingness to compromise on how we get to those goals, will help us get back to making Hadoop even better. Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. Hadoop-0.20-sustaining is the stable version of Hadoop we currently run o= n Yahoo's 40,000 nodes. It contains a series of fixes and enhancements that are all backwards compatible with our "Hadoop 0.20 with security". It is our most stable and high performance release of Hadoop ever. We've expende= d a lot of energy finding and fixing bugs in it this year. We have initiated the process of contributing this work to Apache in the branch: hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security. We've proposed calling this the 20.100 release. Once folks have had a chance to try this out and we've had a chance to respond to their feedback, we plan to create 20.100 release candidates and ask the community to vote on making them Apache releases. Hadoop-future is our new feature branch. We are working on a set of new features for Hadoop to improve its availability, scalability and interoperability to make Hadoop more usable in mission critical deployments= . You're going to see another burst of email activity from us as we work to get hadoop-future patches socialized, reviewed and checked in. These bulk checkins are exceptional. They are the result of us striving to be more transparent. Once we've merged our hadoop-future and hadoop-0.20-sustainin= g work back into Apache, folks can expect us to return to our regular development cadence. Looking forward, we plan to socialize our roadmaps regularly, actively synchronize our work with other active Hadoop contributors and develop our code collaboratively, directly in Apache. In summary, our decision to discontinue the "Yahoo! Distribution of Hadoop" is a commitment to working more effectively with the Apache Hadoop community. Our goal is to make Apache Hadoop THE open source platform for big data. Thanks, E14 -- PS Here is a draft list of key features in hadoop-future: * HDFS-1052 - Federation, the ability to support much more storage per Hadoop cluster. * HADOOP-6728 - A the new metrics framework * MAPREDUCE-1220 - Optimizations for small jobs --- PPS This is cross-posted on our blog: http://yhoo.it/i9Ww8W --_000_C96DC125467Ctoddpyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2941-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 02 03:26:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 114 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 03:26:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 03:26:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 38244 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 03:26:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37929 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 03:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37917 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 03:25:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:25:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chenqibj@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.142] (HELO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:25:49 +0000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.247]) by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p123PPjr031028 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:25:25 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p123PPoD2523156 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:25:25 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p123PPao022778 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:25:25 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p123POnl022769 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:25:25 +1100 Subject: Keith Chen is out of office for Spring Festival holiday Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Qi BJ Chen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:25:23 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 02/02/2011 11:25:23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBF2B8DF814B2F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2B8DF814B2F" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=C7BBF2B8DF814B2F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2B8DF814B2F Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2011-02-02 and will not return until 2011-02-09. --0__=C7BBF2B8DF814B2F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF2B8DF814B2F-- From general-return-2942-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 02 13:44:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73264 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 13:44:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 13:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 15490 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 13:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15083 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 13:44:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15069 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 13:44:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:44:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erlfilho@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:44:33 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so8635071fxm.35 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:44:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fBjvU2yGi682FisbJ7Un0/AAByHkcT6sjGtxJw6kKzM=; b=cW53EpJw6i+x66jn7SGRtMG80MIZK2FCzI27J3oHwIp8YrmjccXK8V7vS7/R7uT4VQ q58z8KUrqTK3DM/mJbjH7FC2Vi27WpP6e2RZ/+Q5vXZE1gxPSzbX/i7yZQbpooAvvXJQ ZNTVFapSUCpXALjIO2vs+s/BrS9hxYqFZWyY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=A6l6FwNAEjdR0BG6bIDFgMJTOdVszaHu39Renccr1cmBoB40yuGplLlojwegv3Ujms K3u5xMRNl4c6wbf37bGs3LNTSLllVRfCh0uTFmZg3GEEsm7tZgo5Y+FM0NNVpo+m/fgC gwPX0U2hp4oSh+6uNGN5x+zo3y7GqP6kr8PyQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.83.144 with SMTP id f16mr4983797fal.4.1296654250546; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:44:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.78.134 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:44:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:44:10 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: MRUnit and Herriot From: Edson Ramiro To: Hadoop General Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a73700156c049b4cd82d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054a73700156c049b4cd82d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Plz, could you explain me the difference between MRUnit and Herriot? I've read the documentation of both and they seem very similar to me. Is Herriot an evolution of MRUnit? What can Herriot do that MRUnit can't? Thanks in Advance -- Edson Ramiro Lucas Filho {skype, twitter, gtalk}: erlfilho http://www.inf.ufpr.br/erlf07/ --20cf3054a73700156c049b4cd82d-- From general-return-2943-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 02 16:47:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68413 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 16:47:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 16:47:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 99038 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 16:47:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98507 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 16:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98494 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 16:47:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:47:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:47:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 68258 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 16:46:54 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:46:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so772202bwz.35 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:46:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.119.133 with SMTP id z5mr8462721bkq.72.1296665204755; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:46:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.100.134 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:46:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:46:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MRUnit and Herriot From: "Owen O'Malley" To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a81cec0d74049b4f645d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a81cec0d74049b4f645d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please keep user questions off of general and use the user lists instead. This is defined here . MRUnit is for testing user's MapReduce applications. Herriot is for testing the framework in the presence of failures. -- Owen On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Edson Ramiro wrote: > Hi all, > > Plz, could you explain me the difference between MRUnit and Herriot? > > I've read the documentation of both and they seem very similar to me. > > Is Herriot an evolution of MRUnit? > > What can Herriot do that MRUnit can't? > > Thanks in Advance > > -- > Edson Ramiro Lucas Filho > {skype, twitter, gtalk}: erlfilho > http://www.inf.ufpr.br/erlf07/ > --001636c5a81cec0d74049b4f645d-- From general-return-2944-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 04 16:59:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7516 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2011 16:59:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2011 16:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 98801 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 16:59:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98236 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 16:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98222 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2011 16:59:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.21] (HELO col0-omc1-s11.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:59:21 +0000 Received: from COL117-W56 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s11.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:59:00 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_94f9c8d2-c36d-47c6-abb2-1537c19d907b_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: Next CHUG (Chicago Hadoop User Group) meeting is Feb 16th @ Jefferson Tap Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:59:00 -0600 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2011 16:59:00.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1CCB330:01CBC48C] --_94f9c8d2-c36d-47c6-abb2-1537c19d907b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At our last meeting we had a great turnout for Chris Cooper's talk on Avro! The next CHUG meeting will be a departure from our normal routine. Instead = of having a speaker=2C we're meeting at Jefferson Tap (upstairs) in a more = informal 'networking' session.=20 There is no set agenda and the meeting is a way for people to ask others qu= estions about what they are doing or how to do things in the Hadoop environ= ment. (Pig=2C Hive=2C EC2=2C HBase schema design=2C hardware choices=2C mis= c scripts=2C etc...) So if you're in Chicago and didn't know that we had a meetup group=2C now's= the time to come downtown and meet your fellow Hadoopers. :-) For more information check out our meetup page: http://www.meetup.com/Chica= go-area-Hadoop-User-Group-CHUG/#calendar Please join the group and RSVP so I can get some sort of a head count.=20 Thx=20 -Mike PS. For those who aren't in Chicago=2C you're really missing out on some be= autiful weather. If you're planning a trip to Chicago=2C check out our meet= ing dates and times.=20 = --_94f9c8d2-c36d-47c6-abb2-1537c19d907b_-- From general-return-2945-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 05 01:57:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54573 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 01:57:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 01:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 84208 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 01:57:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84152 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 01:57:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84144 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 01:57:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:57:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:57:00 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=vo8Ugbbap/pb6xd6XM1Lsn6iOP+7XEMcH0a+y99NgqaBmO+SFf475fMZ KMT9zU8w6jmS8sGlAQJ/igcYwswtJibgmy1OqrKWkasB13zTi1WnMsDFX KNx2Nd/2UCD/+ek; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1296871015; x=1328407015; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Milind=20Bhandarkar=20 |Subject:=20blog.hadoop.com|Date:=20Sat,=205=20Feb=202011 =2001:57:53=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"general@hadoop.apache .org"=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<3DC9FB43EDD7FA41A763B97517EB8DE0@linkedin .com>; bh=Wi70zs7AVoX0BE6zJHWk8J+J2JtnZITe+IuW8BdeFh4=; b=mvQiTOb/QOX/ZwxPfZUywtMNZBjOxg+p1pdROurJ3JH/9fy3SQm1L+JR n6+mKtUnfeEi9e3yzFUS7YCaWJdK2UL9T1B1Zb8+Nb2CfilbBV+bNxcAd Omw4ku+YRi8Ik8K; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,429,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20431390" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:57:53 -0800 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: blog.hadoop.com Thread-Topic: blog.hadoop.com Thread-Index: AQHLxNgZ20aoUO0cUE2q49XSbf1HsQ== Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:57:53 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3DC9FB43EDD7FA41A763B97517EB8DE0@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Folks, Back in 2007, when I was part of the Hadoop team at Yahoo, and Hadoop usage= had not yet exploded, I had created hadoop.wordpress.com. Also, the subdom= ain blog.hadoop.com points to hadoop.wordpress.com. Despite initial enthusiasm of the small hadoop community (i.e. 8-9 cubicles= around my cubicle :-) then, there were no posts on that blog. Does anyone want to take it over and create something useful ? Please let me know. If you have an account on wordpress.com, I can transfer= it to you easily. Or does one need permission from Apache legal folks to do this ? - milind P.S. Whois indicates that some one called "Cutting, Doug dns@lucene.com" o= wns hadoop.com, and so blog.hadoop.com pointing to hadoop.wordpress.com is = Doug's doing. You will have to negotiate with him whether after the admin c= hange, the cname still remains :-) --- Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com From general-return-2946-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 05 03:07:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88641 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 03:07:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 03:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 62377 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 03:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61982 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 03:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61974 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 03:07:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:07:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:07:25 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1536rFZ016648 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:06:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1296875213; bh=bxR3SLaModcsdVHabvS7gxax+MgEZKBE5Nfq3IOBVXo=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=sZzkEkhuXKX395i4mV+T8ap2YJATZhc1rlrD0iYmH4HZe0WJindmny+2WqjpDb7FT dk2s1CBROAmM9V2lhwwQuKa1ljZY20XudzrCklR51I/0+JhRVpkqyXDsLLW5UiB/yL 0pH1wdMTKUPZQWnZ6qsq6C2AakVOIDbntvQOYzLo= Message-Id: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:06:53 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, I'd be interested assuming the legal stuff doesn't bite me. :) On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > Hey Folks, > > Back in 2007, when I was part of the Hadoop team at Yahoo, and > Hadoop usage had not yet exploded, I had created > hadoop.wordpress.com. Also, the subdomain blog.hadoop.com points to > hadoop.wordpress.com. > > Despite initial enthusiasm of the small hadoop community (i.e. 8-9 > cubicles around my cubicle :-) then, there were no posts on that blog. > > Does anyone want to take it over and create something useful ? > > Please let me know. If you have an account on wordpress.com, I can > transfer it to you easily. > > Or does one need permission from Apache legal folks to do this ? > > - milind > > > P.S. Whois indicates that some one called "Cutting, Doug dns@lucene.com > " owns hadoop.com, and so blog.hadoop.com pointing to > hadoop.wordpress.com is Doug's doing. You will have to negotiate > with him whether after the admin change, the cname still remains :-) > > --- > Milind Bhandarkar > mbhandarkar@linkedin.com > > > From general-return-2947-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 05 03:15:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89970 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 03:15:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 03:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 68878 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 03:15:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68689 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 03:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68681 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 03:15:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:15:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gaur.vbagga@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:14:55 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2967758wwd.29 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:14:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Z5A9P3iX7C14fprHdJUPTgEZNDK7UYRMckNY7fWPkA=; b=EaoEkWYyObkmDMeRQykbqjIZWSJFKL5+Q/bx7lHDYHkXRUhby8XKqWxtwN9xczUsVR gJyCoGOxnHq6yRyiIaw8XIQK15DuE3oOoq8AhNxHBD1K0maU5WFuwhYkLIf3AkCFvW5V tGoVUypLBcZB696dZ+Bbb2L2l+AWUhg6hWp5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yHwOLJq+ZCsUKCbuI+mRa6uZ86RxEhRYfGRuKFnOre0Xyh8c38JmvvXYRtoQO/vRCW xtaZ8eNVX9BgNTmuRyZTlEBMMEnMCQy92zbagpQtF3mrYSIiM78iqXPoSBAFPKm/QpTb Vf3aLsS2PNjKfMpKE837TsOWduRBT7THsxO6c= Received: by 10.216.62.212 with SMTP id y62mr13541408wec.9.1296875674428; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:14:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.9.68 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:14:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> From: gaurav bagga Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:14:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Arun I can help you with proof reading and other stuff if you want. secondary help to who ever takes on to the blog. Gaurav On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Yes, I'd be interested assuming the legal stuff doesn't bite me. :) > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > >> Hey Folks, >> >> Back in 2007, when I was part of the Hadoop team at Yahoo, and Hadoop >> usage had not yet exploded, I had created hadoop.wordpress.com. Also, th= e >> subdomain blog.hadoop.com points to hadoop.wordpress.com. >> >> Despite initial enthusiasm of the small hadoop community (i.e. 8-9 >> cubicles around my cubicle :-) then, there were no posts on that blog. >> >> Does anyone want to take it over and create something useful ? >> >> Please let me know. If you have an account on wordpress.com, I can >> transfer it to you easily. >> >> Or does one need permission from Apache legal folks to do this ? >> >> - milind >> >> >> P.S. Whois indicates that some one called "Cutting, Doug =A0dns@lucene.c= om" >> owns hadoop.com, and so blog.hadoop.com pointing to hadoop.wordpress.com= is >> Doug's doing. You will have to negotiate with him whether after the admi= n >> change, the cname still remains :-) >> >> --- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> >> >> > > From general-return-2948-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 05 13:53:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 442 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 13:53:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 13:53:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 71898 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 13:53:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71451 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 13:53:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71443 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 13:53:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:53:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.88] (HELO nm18.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.88) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:53:24 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.66] by nm18.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2011 13:53:02 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.8] by tm6.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2011 13:53:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2011 13:53:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 660368.29497.bm@omp1008.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 89507 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Feb 2011 13:53:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296913982; bh=Om7yTqDWWC/7qnTX8au1tReBoWQ2we5KRKOv/2ZxJeY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xdk7WGZMotxOFa/aCqWRNHOkaMYnHcH1KyzZoCAq97l2cyOy3SJdyMueWBBXUibc8R95HjWnXhfiVu2hHtJ5PWItksKAir45eOLS395UMPh8mKEISyR7HYzCjgvvEt6evDqLvdON6B/lkuAFSywUiq+xoEh973jw0ECXDaZHMIc= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GQUyRyc5XqpOnHU+HD2uKRMwM/3ODf2F8wTCBBaFANiyRs6/HMaTqNHqmduTVvPyVk6dpQBbRsTysCtEuJEymNyr1xb1bwU3bA4OAVUiVFb6X8M+p7DXRsOtvmd7ctB+oN6WDSkFhIKXebUy3yES3YRfZ3+wDlB3ktmQYa4hkHc=; Message-ID: <329811.88501.qm@web112114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: JQKuTbEVM1mGGOHgkIdg1er4eH5LWOLeYUi4W0sAfl3Dflf UMS2TyXYH3xmsQ7.7uxlc9I_d.JhsC9Ad3rhYeCjNPR9PUgLvWlE1PiEjIuJ 6ZsgjDQwqDzxOfCSqXB9nza1.GAPmzwDTYArqLzXZjSqgehwRUIKhVu9VwmT tRwd2QWET0NItVONvRDb2.6N4G2ZSCb6VbtF3v9UmOEe9mDIZlK0XPO3bQp1 2kaF72ELpKthPt2v8MAH9eM.PglDvi1bBNjeEhvWcKsEODGvH5xj5s2qqc4m UAg4XHfyLpJmy0DL0XM7vZqY.alGfbCnqkgKV57RFVjouz5avlwWzzcZ5YYO wXSOe23XQyIiEiLMyOtZ_N4w7DKJL3FBPP3_7iLQoLv9x0Fptw5mCTEWh_lX b1AY6lzjMaIo- Received: from [129.132.85.169] by web112114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:53:02 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.108.291010 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:53:02 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Multiple Queue question To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-179121995-1296913982=:88501" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-179121995-1296913982=:88501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, I am trying to submit jobs to different queues in hadoop-0.20.2 I configured conf/mapred-site.xml mapred.queue.names queue1, queue2 Then I was starting wordcount job with following configuration: mapred.job.queue.name queue1 I am trying to run Hadoop with default FIFO scheduler. However the wordcount job appears on http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp that is was submitted to both queue1 and queue2. Did I forgot to configure something ? Thank you very much, Robert --0-179121995-1296913982=:88501-- From general-return-2949-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 05 15:36:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36023 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 15:36:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 15:36:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 37587 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 15:36:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36679 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2011 15:36:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36663 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2011 15:36:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:36:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c61.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.61]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p15FZleZ026124; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:35:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1296920147; bh=pYptUOIAC9MotsnzGq5J+8jDMGKCuanPp/9GVLfzPX0=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:Mime-Version:Date:References; b=NqBaM5vf1LqoAMpBlfnVHTRJWottjBWDrSdU6uoDgNJwLwu7LeLobTxSSHvmbx1Cd hLRwaYp3j/4CMOotaaIO0+M0yDqcuqFqTsvbKy2XG7mijcrnU/EJ/t4jtveMtqLpla PXoKYXBqipIxd6zJmzmdAA8mTVVCPWvTCsskRFlc= Message-Id: <574B3B67-3B40-4279-A8F0-75CD808ED7C9@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <329811.88501.qm@web112114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Multiple Queue question Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:35:47 -0800 References: <329811.88501.qm@web112114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Moving to mapreduce-user@, bcc general@. Please use project-specific lists. The default FIFO scheduler doesn't support queues. You'll need to use the CapacityScheduler. Some details: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/capacity_scheduler.html Arun On Feb 5, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Grandl Robert wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to submit jobs to different queues in hadoop-0.20.2 > > I configured conf/mapred-site.xml > > mapred.queue.names > queue1, queue2 > > > Then I was starting wordcount job with following configuration: > > > > mapred.job.queue.name > queue1 > > > > I am trying to run Hadoop with default FIFO scheduler. > > However the wordcount job appears on > http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp that is was submitted > to both queue1 and queue2. > > Did I forgot to configure something ? > > Thank you very much, > Robert > > > > > From general-return-2950-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 16:26:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75994 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 16:26:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 16:26:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 14917 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 16:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14462 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 16:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14454 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 16:25:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_20_30,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:25:45 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2972130wwi.5 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:25:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HvHzB3H7HrfX5sH30VF6Xz3CpDpWwEdkmDTbOqAz/xo=; b=lG2OluEJpMTgR7SORhKTjGrl16CvYbDaDxw6Dw7dUV0l1EXhW582n91+SA8ZKL7fU2 NK0P5lLIOiZXwxM8oQGwRJVOnL9DlQME1iVBoA5i9axP9BVT6wFmHx8noWtNDLv9ubW+ GqE/1oZeVUjjPOwjtJvDECz793yTZrOpg+34g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZPSNid9CiXyY8Az5OWMUvEfLaW95gITBdbXYHlXC5sV06M7ZBfIc7XIHc3sIJW+LYj unqhLhQhNqdl20shoCNOnn3vTfGKfZM1FiPDPHftJvJ95tVrucph3vy0ULPNDfrOed/P dGYzl10X70qWVw7kpVtryGa4apqpz3aCAAQyc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.220.219 with SMTP id o69mr137929wep.57.1297095924791; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:25:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:25:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:25:24 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Programming book to mapreduce with hadoop From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7b91d63ad6049bb3adf9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364c7b91d63ad6049bb3adf9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hello all ... I need a indication of books for MapReduce programming with Hadoop .. thank s --0016364c7b91d63ad6049bb3adf9-- From general-return-2951-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 16:53:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86303 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 16:53:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 16:53:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 53583 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 16:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53217 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 16:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53208 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 16:53:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:53:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:53:01 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so5278239fxm.35 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/Ph46ynNhUqMiRUNHlmToZ3lQ0DzwKHIZnLDFkvTwIc=; b=PSkO+p83pS2hLcfKXUeIuEjTb7BM8i+sl/6eWlFtE7RqUMjUGYzp0JhGGij7xLl8s3 LxMijBk0cupzgObbeZBZP3Lss9yizYClQUISRsrcwilqcVXz11hDt+i4269/HNOfDxdJ dmuVCPOTYAOTwqfJojJqi4mSqLBULWCjqNSN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=FRJwwj0Ur4gNm/ufUeayLwGf3r+javpDH3/Y+u0MWVmQtfAcRH5ACdpz9YB6jQSNcT GfX2O3RggKqcCGzeJZ7mjYweUfml/nnUl90ZEeeJJROia7ZLjOg8dFLMBUm9LkJ65Mzx 07dot6L9ZtUy5vrxVXY4L3kHMpt/EG3P+GSJI= Received: by 10.223.116.1 with SMTP id k1mr4820961faq.51.1297097561054; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.200 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:52:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:22:20 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Programming book to mapreduce with hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A list is available on Hadoop's wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Books On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > hello all ... > > I need a indication of books for MapReduce programming with Hadoop .. > thank s > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2952-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 18:28:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35183 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 18:28:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 18:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 7437 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 18:28:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7030 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 18:28:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7021 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 18:28:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:28:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:28:18 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:27:50 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:27:58 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:27:54 -0800 Subject: Errors in the log Thread-Topic: Errors in the log Thread-Index: AcvG54IypxqBJFAwRY6G8o57/s6m5AACd4aQ Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCD945F6@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 HBase 0.89.20100924+28 Hadoop 0.20.2+737 During my import process I'm starting to see various warning and errors in = my Hadoop logs. This just started to happen, the import process has been wo= rking for awhile. I tried to put some of the errors from the logs on variou= s machines here to see if this is a know problem. Thanks -Pete Datanode log ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration= (172.16.2.224:50010, storageID=3DDS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626= 750, infoPort=3D50075,=20 ipcPort=3D50020):DataXceiver java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 65557 bytes ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration= (172.16.2.224:50010, storageID=3DDS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626= 750, infoPort=3D50075,=20 ipcPort=3D50020):DataXceiver java.io.IOException: Interrupted receiveBlock WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.InterDatanodeProtocol: Failed t= o getBlockMetaDataInfo for block (=3Dblk_2012842016347254862_70849) from da= tanode (=3D172.16.2.224 :50010) java.io.IOException: Block blk_2012842016347254862_70849 length is 16906240= does not match block file length 16971264 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in BlockR= eceiver.run():=20 java.io.IOException: Broken pipe WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: checkDiskError: excep= tion:=20 java.io.IOException: Broken pipe WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in BlockR= eceiver.run():=20 java.io.IOException: The stream is closed Namenode log WARN org.mortbay.log: /getimage: java.io.IOException: GetImage failed. java= .io.IOException: Content-Length header is not provided by the namenode when= trying to fetch http://0.0.0.0:50090/getimage?getimage=3D1 Secondary name node log ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: Exception i= n doCheckpoint:=20 2011-02-07 08:51:15,062=20 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: java.io.Fil= eNotFoundException: http://caiss01a:50070/getimage?putimage=3D1&port=3D5009= 0&machine=3D0.0.0.0&token=3D-19:84946961:0:1297097472 000:1297097169213 From general-return-2953-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 19:42:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67254 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 19:42:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 19:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27181 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 19:42:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27083 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 19:42:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27017 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 19:42:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:42:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:42:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 66982 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 19:41:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.110]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:41:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:41:58 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Should we instead just blog things at http://blogs.apache.org/? Lots of projects have a blog there. It should be easy to get one that permits, e.g., any PMC member to blog on behalf of the project. Doug On 02/04/2011 07:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Yes, I'd be interested assuming the legal stuff doesn't bite me. :) > > On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Milind Bhandarkar wrote: > >> Hey Folks, >> >> Back in 2007, when I was part of the Hadoop team at Yahoo, and Hadoop >> usage had not yet exploded, I had created hadoop.wordpress.com. Also, >> the subdomain blog.hadoop.com points to hadoop.wordpress.com. >> >> Despite initial enthusiasm of the small hadoop community (i.e. 8-9 >> cubicles around my cubicle :-) then, there were no posts on that blog. >> >> Does anyone want to take it over and create something useful ? >> >> Please let me know. If you have an account on wordpress.com, I can >> transfer it to you easily. >> >> Or does one need permission from Apache legal folks to do this ? >> >> - milind >> >> >> P.S. Whois indicates that some one called "Cutting, Doug >> dns@lucene.com" owns hadoop.com, and so blog.hadoop.com pointing to >> hadoop.wordpress.com is Doug's doing. You will have to negotiate with >> him whether after the admin change, the cname still remains :-) >> >> --- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> mbhandarkar@linkedin.com >> >> >> > From general-return-2954-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 20:37:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95954 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 20:37:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 20:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16645 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 20:37:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16585 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 20:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16577 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 20:37:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:37:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:37:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 95716 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 20:37:32 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:37:32 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so5441480iyb.35 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.31.196 with SMTP id z4mr17636538ibc.199.1297111051494; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.148.82 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:37:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Should we instead just blog things at http://blogs.apache.org/? =A0Lots o= f > projects have a blog there. =A0It should be easy to get one that permits, > e.g., any PMC member to blog on behalf of the project. +1 for adding a project blog at Apache. Is the implication that blog.hadoop.com would point there? -C From general-return-2955-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 21:06:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19777 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 21:06:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 21:06:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 74521 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74449 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74441 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 21:06:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:06:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:06:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 19512 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 21:06:18 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.110]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:06:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4D505ECB.3070802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:06:19 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/07/2011 12:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Is the implication that blog.hadoop.com would point there? -C Sure, I'd be happy to redirect that CNAME. The other redirects for hadoop.com already point to hadoop.apache.org. I grabbed the domain long ago so that squatters wouldn't abuse it as happened with nutch.com. Doug From general-return-2956-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 21:19:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24719 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 21:19:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 21:19:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 96108 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96050 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:19:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96042 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 21:19:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:19:34 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p17LJ615006930 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:19:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297113546; bh=Ca82b9LGX1fYH0UNyEhkQejWMhwsYsVEQocoE8jYElI=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=QJRwcmfM5n8QdNPv6TTMiXG+Sz3MVxPVgdVlHtsvovO+K61kBTkM1/8mpGulbDyD1 jfC4cllannVmbJZSwvsOEnjo8jpWpWdvrOF0g2lW2eUJB1N9/RBhyVXyQlEUEFOMp1 /MbUYkmdRlzvNf/u6N6pHjLHDJME03PGZ1ga0bQo= Message-Id: <34F0EE58-557D-4131-AB0E-78128E9CBFF9@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:19:06 -0800 References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 7, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Should we instead just blog things at http://blogs.apache.org/? > Lots of > projects have a blog there. It should be easy to get one that > permits, > e.g., any PMC member to blog on behalf of the project. > +1 Arun From general-return-2957-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 21:29:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27078 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 21:29:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 21:29:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7162 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:29:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7084 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7076 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 21:29:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:29:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:29:11 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=XEtbEWl7vDCmK/iIj4J9vVzbM7eCGl1/LjpwZaZYLNngk1Q5GvP0u3QS DhTt2E5EyGDaeRpir+dNHWjxOHvSDZayWD3eLfSvl99+F3c0SIfuZStHb Kc3PHZjkBCY+QaU; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297114146; x=1328650146; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20blog.hadoop.com|Date:=20Mon,=207=20Feb =202011=2021:30:09=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<79DED3D5-2F6C-4 942-964D-669F9DCC61FE@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20<4D505ECB.3070802@apache.or g>|References:=20=0D=0A=09<33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70 @yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=09<4D504B06.8090200@apache.org>=0D =0A=20=0D=0A=20<4D505ECB.3070802@apache.org>; bh=5V8gXvZv2swQwiPNVgka0W+RN4jiytfGcDGnG844qMo=; b=GPXWWT1DQxiZQ/J3B1AGiVKBptUPAvf+oGfMHSqJNl0TGsxOqRyYThlf ci83qehZ2cPLMMQRHcoiC8n0y7jEN/AQnHcHs15lF3NW/8QwC2imL0CyC lY1mzebPonoj7Mu; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,438,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20487558" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:30:09 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: blog.hadoop.com Thread-Topic: blog.hadoop.com Thread-Index: AQHLxNgZ20aoUO0cUE2q49XSbf1HsZPyv+aAgAQ6rwCAAA+GgIAACAyAgAAGSYA= Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:30:09 +0000 Message-ID: <79DED3D5-2F6C-4942-964D-669F9DCC61FE@linkedin.com> References: <33F071FF-D0D0-40D1-9767-F16D44A29B70@yahoo-inc.com> <4D504B06.8090200@apache.org> <4D505ECB.3070802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4D505ECB.3070802@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 02/07/2011 12:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> Is the implication that blog.hadoop.com would point there? -C >=20 > Sure, I'd be happy to redirect that CNAME. The other redirects for hadoo= p.com already point to hadoop.apache.org. I grabbed the domain long ago so= that squatters wouldn't abuse it as happened with nutch.com. Too bad about mapreduce.org. ;) From general-return-2958-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 21:59:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37461 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 21:59:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 21:59:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 62290 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:59:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62180 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 21:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62172 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 21:59:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:59:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:58:55 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so2113514gwj.35 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.51.8 with SMTP id y8mr4122852yby.213.1297115605246; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:53:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.57.13 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:53:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCD945F6@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCD945F6@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:53:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Errors in the log To: cdh-user@cloudera.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6a850e224a5049bb842ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd6a850e224a5049bb842ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +cdh-user@cloudera.org bcc: general@hadoop.apache.org Hey Pete, The general@hadoop.apache.org list is for high-level discussion of the Apache Hadoop community (usually votes and governance issues.) A question like this is more appropriate for a *-user list, and since judging by the version numbers you're using CDH3b3, I've added cdh-user@cloudera.org. Though I can't comment on the errors you're seeing in the DN log, I do recognize both errors in your 2NN and NN logs. Those are due to a known bug in CDH3b3 wherein the 2NN incorrectly determines its own host name during a checkpoint, and so tells the NN it can be found at 0.0.0.0. (The "&machine=0.0.0.0" is the giveaway.) This bug will be fixed in the next release of CDH, but in the mean time the solution is just to configure the "dfs.secondary.http.address" to a valid machine name or IP address which will resolve to your 2NN. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Peter Haidinyak wrote: > HBase 0.89.20100924+28 > Hadoop 0.20.2+737 > > During my import process I'm starting to see various warning and errors in > my Hadoop logs. This just started to happen, the import process has been > working for awhile. I tried to put some of the errors from the logs on > various machines here to see if this is a know problem. > > Thanks > > -Pete > > Datanode log > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: > DatanodeRegistration(172.16.2.224:50010, > storageID=DS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626750, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 65557 bytes > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: > DatanodeRegistration(172.16.2.224:50010, > storageID=DS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626750, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Interrupted receiveBlock > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.InterDatanodeProtocol: Failed > to getBlockMetaDataInfo for block (=blk_2012842016347254862_70849) from > datanode (=172.16.2.224 > :50010) > java.io.IOException: Block blk_2012842016347254862_70849 length is 16906240 > does not match block file length 16971264 > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in > BlockReceiver.run(): > java.io.IOException: Broken pipe > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: checkDiskError: > exception: > java.io.IOException: Broken pipe > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in > BlockReceiver.run(): > java.io.IOException: The stream is closed > > > > Namenode log > > WARN org.mortbay.log: /getimage: java.io.IOException: GetImage failed. > java.io.IOException: Content-Length header is not provided by the namenode > when trying to fetch http://0.0.0.0:50090/getimage?getimage=1 > > > Secondary name node log > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: Exception > in doCheckpoint: > 2011-02-07 08:51:15,062 > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: > java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://caiss01a:50070/getimage?putimage=1&port=50090&machine=0.0.0.0&token=-19:84946961:0:1297097472 > 000:1297097169213 > --000e0cd6a850e224a5049bb842ec-- From general-return-2959-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 07 22:01:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39336 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 22:01:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 22:01:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 66457 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 22:01:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66390 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 22:01:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66382 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 22:01:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:01:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phaidinyak@local.com designates 70.183.28.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.183.28.5] (HELO mail11.local.com) (70.183.28.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:00:57 +0000 Received: from IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com (10.1.190.40) by mail11.local.com (10.1.230.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:00:28 -0800 Received: from IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::895:3aed:8948:77ab]) by IRV1HUBCAS01.eLiberation.com ([fe80::7853:3c40:9449:94df%13]) with mapi; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:00:35 -0800 From: Peter Haidinyak To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:00:34 -0800 Subject: RE: Errors in the log Thread-Topic: Errors in the log Thread-Index: AcvHEjvY23gxAHvQRSif2NDrAAonoQAACnmw Message-ID: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCD9466E@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> References: <321C2E54215EEB41A581FDD9DAECBC5DFCD945F6@IRV1EXMB01.eLiberation.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks, I'll change lists in the future. -Pete -----Original Message----- From: Aaron T. Myers [mailto:atm@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:53 PM To: cdh-user@cloudera.org Subject: Re: Errors in the log +cdh-user@cloudera.org bcc: general@hadoop.apache.org Hey Pete, The general@hadoop.apache.org list is for high-level discussion of the Apache Hadoop community (usually votes and governance issues.) A question like this is more appropriate for a *-user list, and since judging by the version numbers you're using CDH3b3, I've added cdh-user@cloudera.org. Though I can't comment on the errors you're seeing in the DN log, I do recognize both errors in your 2NN and NN logs. Those are due to a known bug in CDH3b3 wherein the 2NN incorrectly determines its own host name during a checkpoint, and so tells the NN it can be found at 0.0.0.0. (The "&machine=3D0.0.0.0" is the giveaway.) This bug will be fixed in the next release of CDH, but in the mean time the solution is just to configure the "dfs.secondary.http.address" to a valid machine name or IP address which will resolve to your 2NN. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Peter Haidinyak wrot= e: > HBase 0.89.20100924+28 > Hadoop 0.20.2+737 > > During my import process I'm starting to see various warning and errors i= n > my Hadoop logs. This just started to happen, the import process has been > working for awhile. I tried to put some of the errors from the logs on > various machines here to see if this is a know problem. > > Thanks > > -Pete > > Datanode log > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: > DatanodeRegistration(172.16.2.224:50010, > storageID=3DDS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626750, infoPort=3D500= 75, > ipcPort=3D50020):DataXceiver > java.io.EOFException: while trying to read 65557 bytes > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: > DatanodeRegistration(172.16.2.224:50010, > storageID=3DDS-118625752-172.16.2.224-50010-1294851626750, infoPort=3D500= 75, > ipcPort=3D50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Interrupted receiveBlock > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.InterDatanodeProtocol: Failed > to getBlockMetaDataInfo for block (=3Dblk_2012842016347254862_70849) from > datanode (=3D172.16.2.224 > :50010) > java.io.IOException: Block blk_2012842016347254862_70849 length is 169062= 40 > does not match block file length 16971264 > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in > BlockReceiver.run(): > java.io.IOException: Broken pipe > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: checkDiskError: > exception: > java.io.IOException: Broken pipe > > WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: IOException in > BlockReceiver.run(): > java.io.IOException: The stream is closed > > > > Namenode log > > WARN org.mortbay.log: /getimage: java.io.IOException: GetImage failed. > java.io.IOException: Content-Length header is not provided by the namenod= e > when trying to fetch http://0.0.0.0:50090/getimage?getimage=3D1 > > > Secondary name node log > > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: Exception > in doCheckpoint: > 2011-02-07 08:51:15,062 > ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SecondaryNameNode: > java.io.FileNotFoundException: > http://caiss01a:50070/getimage?putimage=3D1&port=3D50090&machine=3D0.0.0.= 0&token=3D-19:84946961:0:1297097472 > 000:1297097169213 > From general-return-2960-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 08 16:33:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84938 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2011 16:33:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2011 16:33:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 67523 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 16:33:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67039 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 16:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67019 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2011 16:33:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:32:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:32:54 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGB00KKQ4M91C50@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:32:34 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-08_05:2011-02-08,2011-02-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102080075 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:32:29 -0800 Message-id: <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hmm, haven't seen Hudson post build failures to the common-dev list lately. Ian, can you check that hudson@hudson.apache.org is still subscribed to common-dev@. If not, please add it. Thx, Nige On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: > Konstantin, > > trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target are successful. > > The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time configuration. It was set to 30mins. > I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on fine > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > > > Thanks, > Giri > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> Giri, >> >> Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >> There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. >> It is complaining that >> 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' >> Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? >> >> --Konstantin >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >> wrote: >> >>> Konstantin, >>> >>> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For >>> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Giri >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>> >>>> Giri >>>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. >>>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>>> Thanks, >>>> --Konstantin >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven >>>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>>>> >>>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>> >>>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>> >>>>> -Giri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile >>>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are >>>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel >>>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past >>>>>> them. >>>>>> -Jakob >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. >>>>> Try to >>>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >>>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >>> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be >>>>> digested >>>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is >>> caused >>>>> by >>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is >>> the >>>>> one >>>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that >>> the >>>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the >>> tale >>>>> I >>>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >>>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the >>> upstream >>>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >>>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] >>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >>>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > From general-return-2961-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 08 19:31:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70716 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2011 19:31:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2011 19:31:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 95404 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 19:31:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95039 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 19:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95030 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2011 19:31:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:31:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:31:47 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so4566693qwe.35 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:31:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=hfg+F9bGXn0H/kRL7zeuN/EGT70NITI0oO//POnImSk=; b=PxVwIlZ/43KwSJMxQmNxJgCo3hH6JSZ/LmfkexxC/5hBz+FIJ6i7YMxwWOQQnW18oP tDz6NJAcT56aJaZw9WAHqrx/FLwWfy573umpPk4HdfaNtbm9RMuTNoQj859v6bArR+ct NwJ6Wb5LX31+5neHIPMSmBg8pQQPfg322wRqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=bOWbnxtNqKTWjqQPNkT9TaB+omEcyboYxUkaqlkqgK4QoVlX353Ng2VtESlATyBps5 RJkYVfLbGgQbsKuDFI4iQEhgWDqIsRHWS+YA1WG7a9QSoOwmK52WC6Q82VuI2CcPRilU K+bQVgah09Jnu0ACr1M0Lw2rgxoDNSuMZgG2U= Received: by 10.224.37.81 with SMTP id w17mr16028964qad.132.1297193485223; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.87] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p13sm3859797qcu.17.2011.02.08.11.31.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:31:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:31:12 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E13A2FF-8D87-4319-8751-B1884B6B934F@Holsman.NET> References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Nige. I've subscribed it now. as it's wasn't on the subscriber list. we do = have hudson@lucene.zones.apache.org. but I haven't seen any moderation notices for it either... so I'm not = sure it is generating emails. On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Hmm, haven't seen Hudson post build failures to the common-dev list = lately. =20 >=20 > Ian, can you check that hudson@hudson.apache.org is still subscribed = to common-dev@. If not, please add it. >=20 > Thx, > Nige >=20 >=20 > On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >=20 >> Konstantin, >>=20 >> trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target = are successful. >>=20 >> The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time = configuration. It was set to 30mins. >> I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on = fine=20 >> = https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-tr= unk-Commit >>=20 >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Giri >>=20 >> On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>=20 >>> Giri, >>>=20 >>> Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>> There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. >>> It is complaining that >>> 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' >>> Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? >>>=20 >>> --Konstantin >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Konstantin, >>>>=20 >>>> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit = build. For >>>> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Giri >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Giri >>>>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as = previous ones. >>>>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache = maven >>>>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in = ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> -Giri >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can = compile >>>>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. = Are >>>>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know = Nigel >>>>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused = past >>>>>>> them. >>>>>>> -Jakob >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the = moment. >>>>>> Try to >>>>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >>>>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >>>> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>> = https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-tr= unk-Commit/ >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which = integrated >>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot = be >>>>>> digested >>>>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem = is >>>> caused >>>>>> by >>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning = >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing = (Mahout is >>>> the >>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant = that >>>> the >>>>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is = the >>>> tale >>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins = >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is = MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each = other >>>>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the >>>> upstream >>>>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I = think >>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build = cannot be >>>>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending = any >>>>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to = hdfs and >>>>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>> = /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/bui= ld/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>> = /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.cl= ass)] >>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>> = /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/bui= ld/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_s= ecurity_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >>>>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2962-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 08 19:36:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72126 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1166 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 19:36:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1109 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 19:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1101 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2011 19:36:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:36:16 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [172.29.12.221] ([38.102.147.105]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGB009PJD3K3PE0@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:35:47 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-08_05:2011-02-08,2011-02-08,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102080099 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <2E13A2FF-8D87-4319-8751-B1884B6B934F@Holsman.NET> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:35:44 -0800 Message-id: <23956D01-5586-4FE2-95C6-4AAD78A1F6BB@mac.com> References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> <2E13A2FF-8D87-4319-8751-B1884B6B934F@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) ah, that's the old address. I wonder how many of our lists have the old one... nige On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi Nige. > I've subscribed it now. as it's wasn't on the subscriber list. we do have hudson@lucene.zones.apache.org. > > but I haven't seen any moderation notices for it either... so I'm not sure it is generating emails. > > On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Hmm, haven't seen Hudson post build failures to the common-dev list lately. >> >> Ian, can you check that hudson@hudson.apache.org is still subscribed to common-dev@. If not, please add it. >> >> Thx, >> Nige >> >> >> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >> >>> Konstantin, >>> >>> trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target are successful. >>> >>> The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time configuration. It was set to 30mins. >>> I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on fine >>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Giri >>> >>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>> >>>> Giri, >>>> >>>> Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>> There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. >>>> It is complaining that >>>> 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' >>>> Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? >>>> >>>> --Konstantin >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Konstantin, >>>>> >>>>> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For >>>>> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Giri >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Giri >>>>>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. >>>>>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven >>>>>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Giri >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile >>>>>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are >>>>>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel >>>>>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>> -Jakob >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. >>>>>>> Try to >>>>>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >>>>> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be >>>>>>> digested >>>>>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is >>>>> caused >>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is >>>>> the >>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the >>>>> tale >>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >>>>>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the >>>>> upstream >>>>>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>>>>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >>>>>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] >>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >>>>>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > From general-return-2963-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 08 23:21:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75304 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2011 23:21:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2011 23:21:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 17533 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 23:21:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17431 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2011 23:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17423 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2011 23:21:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:21:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:21:45 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so4743415qwe.35 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:21:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=yGEHQEPCdmIypZHtCemcRfYMLkB2ayjQsN3Cc0bUXCo=; b=XZGL5y5zo6MBRVJQjE1W0Ahzi6OeB61wWFHueOHyFjqZ8SrmWH3juXaDgyVPKiNt0O Fg2qiZ9HcymgTvCP8HCcdZ75IxgakEH7CqR3lcIK8AvnqnZ36ET8fDPIVVTfic0XCZga OF6majKxOUnq+jlWlUPOh2U7LNKGnicGqJZts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=bfOCWcFPQ/dHto0eQrBuzuADGJy1wUTltC0IF7WCed+bV6GILcve4NxaOdpZMly7ug 23Abkt1Rh/t9uGjcEaVmA1R7ji3z8s2hJltefyIpEht+7DLsIFlUWBNEOOCm//dpoJjL dG0MsuwdwTv11gdGrCIpd/rEKsJh97cE8Zzh4= Received: by 10.224.10.195 with SMTP id q3mr15837560qaq.35.1297207282386; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:21:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.87] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm5745qco.11.2011.02.08.15.21.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:21:21 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <23956D01-5586-4FE2-95C6-4AAD78A1F6BB@mac.com> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:21:09 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <229E1339-4B9E-4FBD-B6A6-EF9EFAA8FFD0@Holsman.NET> References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> <2E13A2FF-8D87-4319-8751-B1884B6B934F@Holsman.NET> <23956D01-5586-4FE2-95C6-4AAD78A1F6BB@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I'll check it out later on today. even if it is sending from the wrong email address, I should be able to = moderate them through regardless. (I haven't seen any recently) can you see if hudson is working on common-dev first? regards Ian On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > ah, that's the old address. I wonder how many of our lists have the = old one... >=20 > nige >=20 > On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >> Hi Nige. >> I've subscribed it now. as it's wasn't on the subscriber list. we do = have hudson@lucene.zones.apache.org. >>=20 >> but I haven't seen any moderation notices for it either... so I'm not = sure it is generating emails. >>=20 >> On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> Hmm, haven't seen Hudson post build failures to the common-dev list = lately. =20 >>>=20 >>> Ian, can you check that hudson@hudson.apache.org is still subscribed = to common-dev@. If not, please add it. >>>=20 >>> Thx, >>> Nige >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Konstantin, >>>>=20 >>>> trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target = are successful. >>>>=20 >>>> The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort = time configuration. It was set to 30mins. >>>> I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on = fine=20 >>>> = https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-tr= unk-Commit >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Giri >>>>=20 >>>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Giri, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>>> There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. >>>>> It is complaining that >>>>> 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' >>>>> Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of = failures? >>>>>=20 >>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Konstantin, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit = build. For >>>>>> now I have published the common artifact manually from = commandline. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Giri >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Giri >>>>>>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as = previous ones. >>>>>>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache = maven >>>>>>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in = ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> -Giri >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can = compile >>>>>>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. = Are >>>>>>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I = know Nigel >>>>>>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is = diffused past >>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>> -Jakob >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the = moment. >>>>>>>> Try to >>>>>>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced = by >>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >>>>>> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>> = https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-tr= unk-Commit/ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which = integrated >>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which = cannot be >>>>>>>> digested >>>>>>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the = problem is >>>>>> caused >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning = >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing = (Mahout is >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which = meant that >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that = is the >>>>>> tale >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins = >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is = MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against = each other >>>>>>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps = the >>>>>> upstream >>>>>>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were = committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but = I think >>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build = cannot be >>>>>>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not = sending any >>>>>>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to = hdfs and >>>>>>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>> = /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/bui= ld/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>> = /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.cl= ass)] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>> = /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/bui= ld/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_s= ecurity_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file = name... >>>>>>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is = ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2964-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 09 17:12:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89230 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 17:12:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 17:12:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 15612 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 17:12:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15290 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 17:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15280 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 17:12:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:12:06 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGD007N513K36A0@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:11:45 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-09_06:2011-02-09,2011-02-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102090095 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:11:43 -0800 Message-id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org After considering the feedback, I will move forward with calling a separate vote for each contrib (or small groups of contribs). The vote will ask the PMC to abandon the given contrib or move it to core. For those we agree to abandon, I will setup an Attic wiki that will point to the last SVN revision of the contrib. I will also start a Related Projects wiki (if we don't already have one) with pointers to the contrib modules that folks have volunteered to keep developing elsewhere. Cheers, Nige On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > failmon > hod > test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > data_join > dynamic-scheduler > eclipse-plugin > fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > gridmix > index > mrunit > mumak > raid > sqoop > streaming -- move to MR core? > vaidya > vertica > > > HDFS Contrib: > fuse-dfs > hdfsproxy > thriftfs > > > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-2965-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 09 17:19:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91687 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 17:19:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 17:19:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 35178 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 17:19:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34674 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 17:19:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34665 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 17:19:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:19:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:18:51 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGD004FH1EG5R00@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:18:18 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-09_06:2011-02-09,2011-02-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102090096 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:18:16 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2966-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 09 19:31:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77057 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 19:31:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 19:31:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 96504 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 19:31:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96122 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 19:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96114 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 19:30:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:30:51 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so410044qwe.35 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:30:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.239.142 with SMTP id kw14mr16440794qcb.38.1297279830640; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:30:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:30:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. =A0I= t's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008= : > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis= of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-2967-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 09 19:50:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84684 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 19:50:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 19:50:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 39246 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 19:50:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38793 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 19:50:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38784 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 19:50:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:50:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:50:05 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p19JnOLb010794 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297280965; bh=fcplp8q3NvLfEkOxBp6IQjTzCnt3S3RFx4hKua4dYCk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=uMTdNFa5FDcduVHyEz5Kp70NoDUNrCUmVx1kT3gI1LwaU5FXuNCpPbBIBSbzAc/8z tjL5JA9qkmYuuW18hkpkCsGHC/fTQvCxxt4HsIOJVux7m6in7E2EjblYJqJnEJofey AdTBXrIEzXHf2NO5rmc1FlwQ4aTNdsrvMxP/rDkY= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:49:24 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 Arun On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib > component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original > commit in August of 2008: > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and > analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > Here is my +1. > > Nige From general-return-2968-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 01:55:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86357 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 01:55:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 01:55:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 89278 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 01:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89192 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 01:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89184 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 01:55:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:55:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:55:40 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2481772wwi.5 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:55:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLuMGaMxcFBpOMYWfTOkHTgKct8yESOsRH8ExCyKjV0=; b=jsR5pM1Eepvqwkszvx/gCJDUPE05rySwFkpzEzmrUvLdiWMnunIUCQbmROe6n1qDPj +UymwyopkkPvmcGsnlqPlyiVhkUYE/qBpE/VJ2vI6IGptLxszMaXVTi1e7y+TC9ADETd uZnGil3pJIQfZNcKOq35XX1q3jvWOhod6rN+A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HkhAKzMWxxV/TmhLhU8mkuSYggIJjRqW1hfqXfKIpI/dkxLxvfWd1QvfrXfQ3Ru+af VS56p1gA3diX0mac8/gFfEYoe/nPsLThd1rDv2X4/h9SFQ+k8C+fJrNgjSo14fArf6Wv aAt+/x8LXaqu7dOCdG9fIRRDmgaAiy0AMAc/E= Received: by 10.216.173.147 with SMTP id v19mr18938757wel.102.1297302751640; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:52:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.193 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:23:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:23:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. =A0I= t's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008= : > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis= of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-2969-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 02:46:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6843 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 02:46:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 02:46:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22480 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 02:46:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22148 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 02:46:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22140 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 02:46:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:46:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:46:11 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=rqg51Cb/R0I+HjD+ceJa7jWz7J/WKQgxn9BDMIufnnTd6zVliqq35mNs 9uMXaluFR+vbgD4VySxSqM2/kxlYEmCYfSDSuXFew7YvXAZCkJOOoNp4p Idg0NzNQ3AHoreD; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297305967; x=1328841967; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20failmon=20Common=20c ontrib|Date:=20Thu,=2010=20Feb=202011=2002:47:12=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<04D296EB-2D0B-4C1E-B094-2881508AFD42@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<1C5D17072608F443979915D41C0D080B@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=wJHOj/h+m9GU9O1+c/+hAYpbD17Ms9HvXpMeqE3JDWc=; b=sKFZHqRfJm68wANLWHQgIZ9YU640VphnIyPy5be2oKJQ0hlmBgBqrsmG Gq7a1CiT4oPzhiqsLSXf5S/lasbJIDVVdN2EenlEffpDAm6p3lppOj94k CzeKBvUle8he0jb; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,449,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20594044" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:47:12 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyH2mCiwdAds8qkuATBAp8rE3DJP6jmEA Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:47:12 +0000 Message-ID: <04D296EB-2D0B-4C1E-B094-2881508AFD42@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1C5D17072608F443979915D41C0D080B@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It'= s last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: Are there any patches in the patch queue? When it comes to contrib, last commit is pretty useless IMO.= From general-return-2970-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 03:38:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31566 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 03:38:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 03:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 60256 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 03:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59979 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 03:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59971 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 03:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.105] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:38:03 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1A3bfUF029499 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:37:42 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:37:41 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:37:40 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Index: AcvI0961R/NdGOFIRWyT5DZTUjL0nw== Message-ID: <84E62479-A4EE-4AB5-8148-F038FE4532B5@jpl.nasa.gov> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Hi Nigel, My 2 cents -- why is Hadoop re-creating its own mini-Attic? The point of th= e umbrella project shakedown over the past year at Apache is to stop projec= ts from recreating things like the Incubator (and the Attic) inside of the = project. One suggestion: for your [VOTE] thread that you are calling -- if the resul= t is to attic the project -- move it to the "real" Apache Attic, via a boar= d resolution (you could do a single board resolution from the Hadoop PMC to= the Apache Board containing the set of projects to Attic).=20 Cheers, Chris On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > After considering the feedback, I will move forward with calling a separa= te vote for each contrib (or small groups of contribs). The vote will ask t= he PMC to abandon the given contrib or move it to core. For those we agree= to abandon, I will setup an Attic wiki that will point to the last SVN rev= ision of the contrib. I will also start a Related Projects wiki (if we don= 't already have one) with pointers to the contrib modules that folks have v= olunteered to keep developing elsewhere. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> Folks, >>=20 >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/= foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start= a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hd= fs. =20 >>=20 >> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that= nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long r= elease cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib c= omponents would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted e= lsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *def= ault* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should g= raduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're= included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of con= trib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >>=20 >> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any)= . >>=20 >> Common Contrib: >> failmon >> hod >> test >>=20 >>=20 >> MapReduce Contrib: >> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >> data_join >> dynamic-scheduler >> eclipse-plugin >> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >> gridmix >> index >> mrunit >> mumak >> raid >> sqoop >> streaming -- move to MR core? >> vaidya >> vertica >>=20 >>=20 >> HDFS Contrib: >> fuse-dfs >> hdfsproxy >> thriftfs >>=20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-2971-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 06:36:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11061 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 06:36:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 06:36:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 60712 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 06:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60257 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 06:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60244 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 06:36:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:36:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:36:19 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGE00BKN2B1O220@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:35:26 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-10_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102090243 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <84E62479-A4EE-4AB5-8148-F038FE4532B5@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:35:25 -0800 Message-id: References: <84E62479-A4EE-4AB5-8148-F038FE4532B5@jpl.nasa.gov> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Chris, You use the word 'project' over and over. These contrib modules are not Apache projects. They are source code directories within the various Hadoop subprojects. Reading thru attic.apache.org, I don't see how it directly relates. Surely not every 'svn remove ' should be replaced with a move to attic.apache.org. Cheers, Nige On Feb 9, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > My 2 cents -- why is Hadoop re-creating its own mini-Attic? The point of the umbrella project shakedown over the past year at Apache is to stop projects from recreating things like the Incubator (and the Attic) inside of the project. > > One suggestion: for your [VOTE] thread that you are calling -- if the result is to attic the project -- move it to the "real" Apache Attic, via a board resolution (you could do a single board resolution from the Hadoop PMC to the Apache Board containing the set of projects to Attic). > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> After considering the feedback, I will move forward with calling a separate vote for each contrib (or small groups of contribs). The vote will ask the PMC to abandon the given contrib or move it to core. For those we agree to abandon, I will setup an Attic wiki that will point to the last SVN revision of the contrib. I will also start a Related Projects wiki (if we don't already have one) with pointers to the contrib modules that folks have volunteered to keep developing elsewhere. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. >>> >>> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >>> >>> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). >>> >>> Common Contrib: >>> failmon >>> hod >>> test >>> >>> >>> MapReduce Contrib: >>> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >>> data_join >>> dynamic-scheduler >>> eclipse-plugin >>> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >>> gridmix >>> index >>> mrunit >>> mumak >>> raid >>> sqoop >>> streaming -- move to MR core? >>> vaidya >>> vertica >>> >>> >>> HDFS Contrib: >>> fuse-dfs >>> hdfsproxy >>> thriftfs >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > From general-return-2972-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 06:54:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16245 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 06:54:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 06:54:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 73194 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 06:54:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72723 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 06:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72715 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 06:54:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:54:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.105] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:54:06 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1A6rfZv015401 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:53:45 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:53:36 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:53:33 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Index: AcvI7z02x9ouEYTURaGkieyFL5YU8g== Message-ID: References: <84E62479-A4EE-4AB5-8148-F038FE4532B5@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Hi Nige, Thanks. I think in fact it does directly relate -- to use your verbage belo= w -- not ever svn remove requires a [DISCUSS] thread before svn remov= ing it, right? Hence, my knee-jerk reaction on reading this thread is that contrib modules= are =3D contrib modules in other umbrella projects -- some are small, and = likely yes should be part of the core of Hadoop; others are not, and are in= fact, "mini projects" that have been baking up in Hadoop for a while. In t= he case of the former, I agree, +1, those should be moved as part of the Ha= doop core "project". In the case of the latter, I do not agree that simply = the Hadoop project should create a wiki page and declare by VOTE that there= won't be anymore development on them. In fact, they are perfect candidates= for moving to the Attic where someone besides the Hadoop PMC might want to= pick up on them at a later point in time. There is no hard and fast rule for the size of a TLP too btw: utilities tha= t run on top of Hadoop could go through e.g., Incubation, and eventually gr= aduate to TLPs. Cheers, Chris On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Hi Chris, >=20 > You use the word 'project' over and over. These contrib modules are not = Apache projects. They are source code directories within the various Hadoo= p subprojects. Reading thru attic.apache.org, I don't see how it directly r= elates. Surely not every 'svn remove ' should be replaced with a move= to attic.apache.org. =20 >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 >=20 > On Feb 9, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >=20 >> Hi Nigel, >>=20 >> My 2 cents -- why is Hadoop re-creating its own mini-Attic? The point of= the umbrella project shakedown over the past year at Apache is to stop pro= jects from recreating things like the Incubator (and the Attic) inside of t= he project. >>=20 >> One suggestion: for your [VOTE] thread that you are calling -- if the re= sult is to attic the project -- move it to the "real" Apache Attic, via a b= oard resolution (you could do a single board resolution from the Hadoop PMC= to the Apache Board containing the set of projects to Attic).=20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Chris >>=20 >> On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> After considering the feedback, I will move forward with calling a sepa= rate vote for each contrib (or small groups of contribs). The vote will ask= the PMC to abandon the given contrib or move it to core. For those we agr= ee to abandon, I will setup an Attic wiki that will point to the last SVN r= evision of the contrib. I will also start a Related Projects wiki (if we d= on't already have one) with pointers to the contrib modules that folks have= volunteered to keep developing elsewhere. >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Folks, >>>>=20 >>>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.or= g/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to sta= rt a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and = hdfs. =20 >>>>=20 >>>> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures th= at nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long= release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib= components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted= elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *d= efault* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should= graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they'= re included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of c= ontrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >>>>=20 >>>> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss an= y). >>>>=20 >>>> Common Contrib: >>>> failmon >>>> hod >>>> test >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> MapReduce Contrib: >>>> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >>>> data_join >>>> dynamic-scheduler >>>> eclipse-plugin >>>> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >>>> gridmix >>>> index >>>> mrunit >>>> mumak >>>> raid >>>> sqoop >>>> streaming -- move to MR core? >>>> vaidya >>>> vertica >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> HDFS Contrib: >>>> fuse-dfs >>>> hdfsproxy >>>> thriftfs >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>=20 >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-2973-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 07:13:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31930 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 07:13:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 07:13:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92017 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 07:13:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91814 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 07:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91806 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 07:13:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:13:23 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1047859wye.35 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:13:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BbeEbMUXOi9+IvbWJkktq+KsJPKpFw/DnafBjfD2YKA=; b=TXQEkGj1XbmSb7iW2D7/muNAgXTrVpD92aiV2wcBjbB7SJsrbNTQPDtKj25A/npDa0 99BbYh5MgtOGsgldozc3ujCunEcs3tAJyZ2F6cmrovZrbEoPrbQ5m2n9J0kM069LVKYq Cnqh60zivrCIvNWb42XNMkX0+zDUffyutO47g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nsW/auMYzQvx1JrjmrU068O8Z0hXwRUiILH6RslCWdkWw848wt+bUU0XBf+gIzQiLW Kyz6Rj5QQHOFNnrn5KN3yYD1wEr03ZSpB+et/x0P6iyXrpjuX2BwHjKYcQimlVmI8t+1 F+o8fwdNhH86poHeyE3dbbzU6A4YAWok7yGBA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.154.130 with SMTP id o2mr5928331wbw.137.1297321982835; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:13:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.185.135 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:13:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:13:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e657b052f23b2c049be84f0d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e657b052f23b2c049be84f0d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Tom White wrote: > +1 > > Tom > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. > It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of > 2008: > > > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis > of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > Nige > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0016e657b052f23b2c049be84f0d-- From general-return-2974-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 09:41:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9524 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 09:41:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 09:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 88883 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88747 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88739 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 09:41:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:41:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:41:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7386E1BA75C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:56 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FJruB7J7Mjgr for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C949C1BA741 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:55 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1297935641.27782@Crs+uuqUq/ffkFPNGeuVBQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p1A9efAt021270 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:41 GMT Message-ID: <4D53B299.30206@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:40:41 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p1A9efAt021270 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 09/02/11 17:18, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > Here is my +1. > > Nige =0 I'm not sure that apache-extras is the right place. I'd more interested in putting it to the apache attic and making sure that the svn to git bridge works for them, so anyone who wants to fork it can do it by typing git clone * keeps the code under the ASF, makes it easier to go live * makes it easier for anyone with commit rights to pull in the source and work with it * if someone wants to take it live, they will do it within apache, and so feed back into the code base. we have an attic, so let's move it there. From general-return-2975-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 09:45:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12763 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 09:45:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 09:45:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 95655 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94994 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 09:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94976 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 09:45:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:45:25 +0000 Received: from 35-126.77-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.77.126.35] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnT5E-0006UO-Ix; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:45:04 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Blog post on Gerrit (GIT review tool) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:44:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102101044.54634.thomas@koch.ro> http://alblue.bandlem.com/2011/02/someday.html Very nice writeup of the advantages of Gerrit and integration with Jenkins. Gerrit is a code review plattform on top of GIT developed by Google for the Android project and in use at the Eclipse Foundation. How do you think in general about GIT for the ASF? It puzzles me, that there doesn't seem to be much of an interest to get official GIT repositories despite the pain of working with Subversion. The discussion on infra@a.o is stale for more then 2 months now. Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-2976-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 16:57:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58137 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 16:57:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 16:57:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 57527 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 16:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57298 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 16:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57289 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 16:57:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:57:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:57:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 57997 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 16:56:54 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:56:54 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so842075eyz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:56:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.134 with SMTP id i6mr6078832bkg.36.1297357012536; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:56:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D53B299.30206@apache.org> References: <4D53B299.30206@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:56:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bfdde10f1c049bf077e7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5bfdde10f1c049bf077e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 09/02/11 17:18, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It's >> last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: >> > +1 > I'm not sure that apache-extras is the right place. I'd more interested in >> putting it to the apache attic and making sure that the svn to git bridge >> works for them, so anyone who wants to fork it can do it by typing git clone > > This is just a vote to remove it from Hadoop. If someone decides to adopt it, they can choose where to host it (github, sourceforge, google code, or apache extras, etc.). Since the code was in subversion, it will always be available in the revision from before it was deleted. > * keeps the code under the ASF, makes it easier to go live > Apache extras isn't under the ASF in any meaningful sense. Projects under Apache extras do not have any restrictions on their governance model or even software license. In particular, there are no PMCs over in Apache extras. > we have an attic, so let's move it there. > Attic is for projects that have been retired. This is just a contrib component that we are voting on retiring. -- Owen --001636c5bfdde10f1c049bf077e7-- From general-return-2977-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 10 21:59:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8560 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 21:59:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 21:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 58764 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 21:59:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58687 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 21:59:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58679 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 21:59:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:59:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.83] (HELO homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:59:44 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E662C8075 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:59:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=L9k/ZN4NQt/w0OGc6OILnSKbXuXi4UutirOnbmkgbt3MRJ+HxojM 08av/5lBs952IsBGRQS6jLVy+6h9aJhLltBoRRjTAdlkv/x3xvP0HzVWKHR4RJh7 VwKUE3wVW+GRFsyjI4Z6Hx6fvUxuhDnWorWX/6ttQ9Qy9bMKm2soRXk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=Zh/GW1rWhFM776XnW7hx7hGwKtI=; b=Xv+cpLP6hHcIkM6RsNjk1c89+oLe 9HYxFXEfvCJeVmRGU30jpON3KZNhOtGkOC9hWLlTf73I8WWAPNPNGV7liGvyBrmw MDAstlaBmNRVZvwnVIFNhUpMRajtSRO7KLb+eoPbp9LllctZ7Evquy6UuohJJGrm v3k0q2QG5VTruMY= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a24.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A44D82C8057 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:59:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:59:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7632FD7B-A1E0-4C35-BDF5-EDFF01458CFE@gbiv.com> References: <84E62479-A4EE-4AB5-8148-F038FE4532B5@jpl.nasa.gov> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) The Apache Attic exists for products that have been released by the ASF but for which there is no longer a community capable of making decisions like "do we release a fix to this security issue". contrib stuff does not need to go to the Attic -- it can just be svn removed, or svn moved to something like a "sandbox" area that doesn't get released. ....Roy From general-return-2978-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 02:46:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42566 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 02:46:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 02:46:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59687 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:46:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59277 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59268 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 02:46:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:46:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:45:56 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00H4AMBXZN00@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:45:34 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-10_08:2011-02-10,2011-02-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100217 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <04D296EB-2D0B-4C1E-B094-2881508AFD42@linkedin.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:45:33 -0800 Message-id: <8101A02A-4B82-4856-A033-73E93DF47447@mac.com> References: <04D296EB-2D0B-4C1E-B094-2881508AFD42@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:47 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: > > Are there any patches in the patch queue? Not that I could find. (answering your own question would have been helpful :-) > When it comes to contrib, last commit is pretty useless IMO. I'll include that info in the remaining votes. Nige From general-return-2979-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 02:52:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43462 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 02:52:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 02:52:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 62796 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:52:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62613 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:52:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62605 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 02:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:52:21 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00KJ2MLWTF60@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:51:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-10_08:2011-02-10,2011-02-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100219 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:51:32 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was February 2009: HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Available since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2980-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 02:59:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44695 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 02:59:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 02:59:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 69946 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:59:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69735 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 02:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69722 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 02:59:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:59:18 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00DDHMXBHM10@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:58:24 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-10_08:2011-02-10,2011-02-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100219 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:58:22 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was March 2010: HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli Collins. There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of them Patch Available. Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2981-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 03:18:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56967 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 03:18:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 03:18:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81987 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:18:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81537 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:18:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81524 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 03:18:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:18:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:18:46 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2081177wye.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:18:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lRmEnvkCFSGRwSOEL7819duOEbIyjmemwjAJbTtQyYg=; b=JqL1yaZgT1vBarNxmZA3LTHDPC+QP9gMsYBx7YWP7VHR6D1/vrPk0zZ4gqL1O5V4lK VpAlzs5wVffs2N97W4e1rIEKwxkku1hcYMRqUgX9zSuKmSlVztkQaMMr4CvUSh4lkpiF SDD8daK9vtytKHf/vMtFCq+e/ZYRYyik9ZxWk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PHalwdmZbdWw01G2b4wpkxU/3kfEjlMlx7Ocq/6NbJFIhxIP8pFHSdtYFYyurI7kC7 ipuz7JEgpm24VDfDT0xzW6HRrzZdkMad0pmvYXkMXE+pgcpdAucNr/E1YWasawYH7orh HTxchMt3byM2v+v3ytr4wY0G5RHo0iCVTbqIU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.55.145 with SMTP id k17mr243622wec.48.1297394305342; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.185.135 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:18:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:18:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab4dfb41c73049bf926ac --0016e6dab4dfb41c73049bf926ac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last > meaningful contribution was February 2009: > > HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services > provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. > > There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch > Available since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0016e6dab4dfb41c73049bf926ac-- From general-return-2982-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 03:20:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57126 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 03:20:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 03:20:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 83180 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:20:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83048 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83040 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 03:20:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:20:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:20:29 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2036306wwd.29 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IRA73qKy/MrP29qmpV0KSHhqSZxrOZC8sZsitZcIMHs=; b=KtGzWWjAUdH1hEuD9ihe4uEPXJNTHFQ6dS5DJpT9cLVo51cvxh7+aYqZmbRkzEvg5R ba6CTrcye3bTYXmLcV3rYoKDhrviKfcOpdPpJOmBrP+f+nm4XCLSyy98iloEM/2irD9F zlNnACbMyp1CW1ocLOSZ/lga1AU1mal9R1M1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LhvDD4ue/jJ1l5bKRSlLQpm5SSy8NbyQ5C9J8um8PIrGFs73hMxK1gdEO+WsYsA4C8 vn3e2YYdBKGaHNHhDJKteJhOkZMP4zYfUoe+i5O1i9GH7lE0mEYTQE/kCqLcxzAJnat3 JfB1c/Ezzz82QxdreTvuF+ygX0FY+Fmagzy3E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.141 with SMTP id p13mr228265wep.102.1297394408001; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.185.135 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:20:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:20:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646da74d293fd049bf92cd4 --00163646da74d293fd049bf92cd4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am guessing that this is in moderate use by people and seems like a useful thing. I do not use it myself. -dhruba On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's > last meaningful contribution was March 2010: > > HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli Collins. > > There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of them Patch > Available. > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --00163646da74d293fd049bf92cd4-- From general-return-2983-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 03:41:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60819 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 03:41:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 03:41:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 95296 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:41:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94894 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94886 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 03:41:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:41:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:41:01 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00IWAOVT5530@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:40:41 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_01:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=1 spamscore=1 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100233 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:40:40 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was August 2010: HDFS-1340. A null delegation token is appended to the url if security is disabled when browsing filesystem. There are 7 unresolved contrib/hdfsproxy issues in Jira, none of them Patch Available. Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2984-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 03:45:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61399 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 03:45:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 03:45:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 99858 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:45:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99493 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 03:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99482 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 03:45:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:45:15 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00H60P1NZN70@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:44:12 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_01:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100235 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon thriftfs HDFS contrib Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:44:11 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I think the PMC should abandon the thriftfs HDFS contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August 2008: HADOOP-3754. Add a thrift interface to access HDFS. (dhruba via omalley) There are 5 unresolved contrib/thriftfs issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Available since November 2009 (HDFS-789). Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2985-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 04:06:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72837 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 04:06:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 04:06:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10730 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:06:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10275 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10177 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 04:06:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:06:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:06:36 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2106334wye.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xhm6EYz0LTusfPO7kldFXi+ToBpmewEr0rxgU1qPnd8=; b=Dr91FvxBsFleXedyA4JNz8M+xqAmwfktmNbaHlVHrdTfgVwmUFJU4/Q6OIBcVb4NWW SkrKd0Bug5sQXd8Rj4TO7eCKawuLyWdGdRTCEqEDXK4+tb6IuxK3Tw5po6PM9S/KWnPZ PGYuoqxZO/hWUa7sM8UvI4V90QUbRpFzEILk0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NdmqrG3uopFmWkj5pphc5EoKfOoLkkFcU2MM3q+e1QJKMLHiOUHWhmTnUCkuXNt3py /wKL3Piynkth6sTXS32EuPVgpLXkocIHqec1sKIew6i09vRsZsOa9jYs4U/4oz4r0RMm 3SS1KTyIX7BwmMkJ4iVX7xXrR8lfNXrJ2VoUg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr4226wep.96.1297397176214; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:16 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uddpioFo1WQQCTXP4inskPv0wwc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon thriftfs HDFS contrib From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the thriftfs HDFS contrib component. =A0It= 's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August 2008: > > HADOOP-3754. Add a thrift interface to access HDFS. (dhruba via omalley) > > There are 5 unresolved contrib/thriftfs issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch A= vailable since November 2009 (HDFS-789). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-2986-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 04:07:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72961 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 04:07:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 04:07:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11877 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11726 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11717 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 04:07:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:07:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:07:10 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2060309wwd.29 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PgF0ewK/opHEkykP+cTejrbnrCatS3tibBIDrCA0jrU=; b=BIas9Wvc/hICdduCV62gsluZQ1ebcNSd67QrBrlqvdNNrKZdN4ldj6299WY4VntxeR pXKgCRyS9y2xaSp5ZSINsH8Bk0Vn4ASFZ68OT3pOIehKut5+CUQY/QSjuI7BuC6aeBc7 1/NiFciALb6g+M2lcMUZGp0035LNsnySusdSk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IyDu6qXplWMUDO/Q5Fa4EYVrBG7qDBc+VBuTcx225DUUGyDS65nl8rxipjayB6adJY NeIIEiqoOwR9QllN4uqafLGI6tKmfPclePHqTNflcBzynjqpUjEOIRqKQPfVsUif+EC9 TtNOPhiYs206AiIGZmD1DDxez2z/oEs/RImgk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr89825wel.104.1297397210108; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:06:50 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Nz_Rlcqc6MpGW-EZd81TFsxkUmc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. =A0I= t's last meaningful contribution was August 2010: > > HDFS-1340. A null delegation token is appended to the url if security is = disabled when browsing filesystem. > > There are 7 unresolved contrib/hdfsproxy issues in Jira, none of them Pat= ch Available. > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-2987-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 04:08:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73096 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 04:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13395 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13282 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13274 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:08:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:08:09 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2107188wye.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:07:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mOZ176HrMZf9JXDUtQrXAWARzYILodDfOf75a8ZxBHI=; b=bCfJIN84OpK9CGT+kH+b/kW3053sLgwmzcdRX41mWdMOPNDwXrj+hrPOpQX+Ca6iF8 OxCxw/BjyaJUS3xJSslEDGiSoVHCF1EiKoTOiEV+qwvQQ3Zqbd3vOco6vRzgYBw6ugdR KSB/VWOcZadPgyU1ZB2U/WOcpOJ6DltHpCR8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=qN1iCazzO6WNLe3pN2PmXPptdYWpcsP/3+fxCA3XPxvwrBI4bVC4WiMVfB56h6S94O GAb0qrTPGvlBHO+gks3MRdFcFXnv80I7WJLQ+JZB+tpehC5S940C2c0AD/v5IHIhik6s jv06WRkQ6655rYaaivzb32NpgKiy3eX695M3M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.25.210 with SMTP id z60mr2947wez.104.1297397268505; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:07:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:07:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:07:48 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 46fL5HRVRsf_-TTZFP33rhm0NZw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on punting it. Its a drag on core. Move it elsewhere. St.Ack On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. =A0It= 's last meaningful contribution was March 2010: > > HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli Collin= s. > > There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of them Pat= ch Available. > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > > From general-return-2988-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 04:09:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73316 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 04:09:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 04:09:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 15331 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15239 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15231 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 04:08:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:08:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:08:50 +0000 Received: by mail-wy0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 20so2107188wye.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:08:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y36QNXwuVNOzpq62vNmjzuCIQN3L8qnuPD3v+gYK5zc=; b=I8bVZKH9jCVf8W0uydkIigLmTGE850l1f+9LndEhZT+OLl+GzWHQwYBz0hGg8UBzKo p6d3HnMxMFdozme6ngzzhNQ72xA5xP0jp3coCZGcGVCxwo0R/j8LRAcRED6k30sieAou TqMwVe3nJdOmrb558vJ+0QF86OC1FXOaFaiZU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=KT/IONDfjKdp93PeLjjwgQgc+4NbqAIbnCOiARU+2pQTorWFIvqVeAoJTiLSPBuOex CC3xpC5UE6Pf4UR2ntoydfgodHrFfDO6ppxIF7pMNeuFl5h+EbOK/+8ccX3xUAbgEESk xyYtHWplpcenEwDMZ0MWz6IVA7uQaFjizF9j4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.24.207 with SMTP id x57mr429wex.89.1297397309977; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:08:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:08:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:08:29 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VSHD3nht1HCQfdfJvTRnA4CZnkA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. =A0It's = last meaningful contribution was February 2009: > > HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop service= s provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. > > There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Avail= able since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-2989-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 05:22:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94993 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 05:22:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 52070 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51503 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51495 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:22:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:22:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 94962 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:22:11 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3021079bwz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.134 with SMTP id i6mr66873bkg.36.1297401728954; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bfdd2f7338049bfae1b6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5bfdd2f7338049bfae1b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's > last meaningful contribution was March 2010: > I think we should hold on to this one until there is a reasonable replacement. -1 -- Owen --001636c5bfdd2f7338049bfae1b6-- From general-return-2990-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 05:23:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95156 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 05:23:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 05:23:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 53111 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:23:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52981 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:23:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52973 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:23:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:23:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:23:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 95088 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:22:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:22:50 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3021472bwz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.98.65 with SMTP id p1mr22045353bkn.198.1297401768275; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:22:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b84b0876db8049bfae3e0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b84b0876db8049bfae3e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 --0016363b84b0876db8049bfae3e0-- From general-return-2991-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 05:24:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95302 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 05:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 05:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 54498 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:24:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54410 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54402 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:24:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:24:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 95238 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:24:08 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:24:08 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3022087bwz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:24:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.6 with SMTP id e6mr63384bka.9.1297401846143; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:24:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:24:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255578762b9a89049bfae8d3 --0003255578762b9a89049bfae8d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. It's > last meaningful contribution was August 2010: > -1 we still use and are maintaining this. -- Owen --0003255578762b9a89049bfae8d3-- From general-return-2992-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 05:58:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14584 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 05:58:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 05:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 73307 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:58:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72981 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 05:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72973 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 05:58:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:58:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:58:27 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF0098WV837F20@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:57:40 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100268 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:57:39 -0800 Message-id: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's >> last meaningful contribution was March 2010: >> > > I think we should hold on to this one until there is a reasonable > replacement. -1 If a reasonable replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change your vote? I believe some folks were interested in developing this elsewhere. Nige From general-return-2993-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 06:12:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26187 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 06:12:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 06:12:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 86553 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:12:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86107 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:12:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86099 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 06:12:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:12:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:12:28 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00MTMVVTMV60@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:11:54 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100270 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:11:52 -0800 Message-id: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. It's >> last meaningful contribution was August 2010: >> > > -1 we still use and are maintaining this. Who's the 'we'? Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was failing a unit test for 7 months. This is exactly the reason we should thoughtfully consider whether it has a future within Hadoop. Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy? Nige From general-return-2994-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 06:34:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30739 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 06:34:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 06:34:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 97869 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:34:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97399 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97391 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 06:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:34:21 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1694565qyk.14 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:34:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=hSjIGLVL99dwX1hxEN6p9jeu/dEmAIkPwTCmD4sEWow=; b=h6MAi3UC6DKkCGotU/bp9N0EGz5ULDlHYjuKt2vSRBX0OXAv61ElpoyItEsEBp1l2/ aZFsXP09mFt1j3/ZXtFFTyua/mamJ3ePkiJusFdbySOzqfagXY5WepP/4rMRmNy0ZLRJ 1uDi7SuIIr0ek/Xk/8+u9prrY+Ixdd4TAs70k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=fQAxj88E4ulq2sUxnDnWRJNE/1/lrDxWXGCOi1NuJ7QFPK2BWqpJQxHbwAM9qqAW1Y FOxVbLvadIfJnTX4pvT9AkPM5MVf0X0ioNYGfTTcTnKxNodpVOKF7NnBWW+UlLwJdjWq hVKLVQRgek8mieb+L4nwOnsLsve8bxUKUNubE= Received: by 10.229.250.130 with SMTP id mo2mr127605qcb.163.1297406040388; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.1.130] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm362315qcu.7.2011.02.10.22.33.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:33:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:33:55 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. = It's >>> last meaningful contribution was August 2010: >>>=20 >>=20 >> -1 we still use and are maintaining this. >=20 >=20 > Who's the 'we'? Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was = failing a unit test for 7 months. This is exactly the reason we should = thoughtfully consider whether it has a future within Hadoop. >=20 > Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy?=20 They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them.. = any chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it?=20 Regards Ian >=20 > Nige >=20 From general-return-2995-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 06:50:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39610 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 06:50:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 06:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9322 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:50:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8992 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 06:50:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8984 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 06:50:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:50:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:50:43 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF00GTVXMKI170@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:49:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100275 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <229E1339-4B9E-4FBD-B6A6-EF9EFAA8FFD0@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:49:30 -0800 Message-id: References: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> <07AA15F8-B4F2-4B5B-8A65-600B31D96D83@mac.com> <2E13A2FF-8D87-4319-8751-B1884B6B934F@Holsman.NET> <23956D01-5586-4FE2-95C6-4AAD78A1F6BB@mac.com> <229E1339-4B9E-4FBD-B6A6-EF9EFAA8FFD0@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > can you see if hudson is working on common-dev first? confirmed. nige On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I'll check it out later on today. > even if it is sending from the wrong email address, I should be able to moderate them through regardless. (I haven't seen any recently) > > can you see if hudson is working on common-dev first? > > regards > Ian > On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> ah, that's the old address. I wonder how many of our lists have the old one... >> >> nige >> >> On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> >>> Hi Nige. >>> I've subscribed it now. as it's wasn't on the subscriber list. we do have hudson@lucene.zones.apache.org. >>> >>> but I haven't seen any moderation notices for it either... so I'm not sure it is generating emails. >>> >>> On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Hmm, haven't seen Hudson post build failures to the common-dev list lately. >>>> >>>> Ian, can you check that hudson@hudson.apache.org is still subscribed to common-dev@. If not, please add it. >>>> >>>> Thx, >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> >>>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Konstantin, >>>>> >>>>> trunk/artifacts gets populated when the jar and the tar ant target are successful. >>>>> >>>>> The main reason for the build failure so far is the build abort time configuration. It was set to 30mins. >>>>> I have increased the build abort time and the builds are going on fine >>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Giri >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Giri, >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at configuration of Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>>>> There seems to be errors in the Post-build Actions. >>>>>> It is complaining that >>>>>> 'trunk' exists but not 'trunk/artifacts/...' >>>>>> Is it possible that this misconfiguration is the reason of failures? >>>>>> >>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Konstantin, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I need to restart the slave which is running the commit build. For >>>>>>> now I have published the common artifact manually from commandline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Giri >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Giri >>>>>>>> looks like the last run you started failed the same way as previous ones. >>>>>>>> Any thoughts on what's going on? >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven >>>>>>>>> repository as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For settings.xml template pls look at >>>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Giri >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile >>>>>>>>>> trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are >>>>>>>>>> there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel >>>>>>>>>> and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past >>>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>> -Jakob >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. >>>>>>>>> Try to >>>>>>>>>>> build trunk. >>>>>>>>>>> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by >>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 >>>>>>>>>>> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >>>>>>>>>>> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because >>>>>>> Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >>>>>>>>>>> build is broken. See here. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>>>> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be >>>>>>>>> digested >>>>>>>>>>> by Hudson since then. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is >>>>>>> caused >>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6864. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the >>>>>>> tale >>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> heard from infra. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>>>>>>>>>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >>>>>>>>>>>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the >>>>>>> upstream >>>>>>>>>>>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>>>>>>>>>>> emails. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >>>>>>>>>>>>> mapreduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... >>>>>>>>> a.out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-2996-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 07:09:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50012 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 07:09:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 07:09:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 18918 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:09:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18466 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:09:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18454 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 07:09:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:09:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:09:09 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF005R1YIM3U10@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:08:47 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100277 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:08:46 -0800 Message-id: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I think the PMC should abandon the mrunit MapReduce contrib component. The originator of mrunit and primary maintainer (Aaron Kimball) is moving the active development elsewhere. There are 2 unresolved contrib/mrunit issues in Jira, none of them Patch Available. Here is my +1. Nige From general-return-2997-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 07:34:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54806 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 07:34:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 07:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 35192 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34809 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:34:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34801 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 07:34:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:34:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:56 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_aq5ekLtfrQ+vWRfb9UlgKA)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGF006U2ZNZ1D00@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:36 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_02:2011-02-10,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102100280 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:33:35 -0800 Message-id: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_aq5ekLtfrQ+vWRfb9UlgKA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Tom has created a public Jira filter for 0.22 blockers (thanks Tom!): https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12313687 With the new version of Jira, this single query across projects & versions is now possible. Looks like 26 issues marked blocker. 9 of them unassigned -- would love to get those assigned. I'll start reviewing these issues more closely over the weekend. Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_aq5ekLtfrQ+vWRfb9UlgKA)-- From general-return-2998-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 07:37:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55652 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 07:37:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 07:37:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 38815 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38614 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:37:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38606 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 07:37:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:37:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:37:18 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3095445bwz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=bgO1wRt+TG6j2Mqv9efWpyYnqTwHF5hf5PCinGAB/1Q=; b=QjMUF9Gd3U487yl5rixzW+yjhkbhiuzd79u/SkS16HQGzC8mhN5gB3go/1hS9Oonrd UYhUh0NYzVAbCNaeDie8vGgcNz8EmaVowjfYkApRqhGxuiElCVwymcJtK6JqYw3HwwmP OZ+r3MChOkGOZA9DUeFB9y3B7HUNO7GEd+QNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=MFIcPssfUMxjNlEONrv/2656Y/qSS9MDGLlphPdzWgKhuOmJB+ehNw5goLsW4x2tCJ FvXlfh2j20yEHmcD63Iv3Z7uMFaKFvVNuWEjUYffFzjKJAAUu7NgziAIa95uziytWcgd xxqpm5KwASD1zZo5OC8BVpg8DcGoNumu5yxkk= Received: by 10.204.97.193 with SMTP id m1mr157979bkn.46.1297409817539; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:36:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:36:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:36:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636457ade4d7519049bfcc365 --001636457ade4d7519049bfcc365 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1. Eric Sammer and I will be working on this via github. (Come join us!) - Aaron On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the mrunit MapReduce contrib component. The > originator of mrunit and primary maintainer (Aaron Kimball) is moving the > active development elsewhere. > > There are 2 unresolved contrib/mrunit issues in Jira, none of them Patch > Available. > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > --001636457ade4d7519049bfcc365-- From general-return-2999-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 07:52:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58973 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 07:52:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 07:52:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 51941 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51509 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 07:52:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51501 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 07:52:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:52:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:52:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 58921 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 07:52:26 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:52:26 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3104435bwz.35 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:52:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.6 with SMTP id e6mr160602bka.9.1297410744610; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:52:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:52:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:52:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255578768f6ff3049bfcfa45 --0003255578768f6ff3049bfcfa45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > +1. Eric Sammer and I will be working on this via github. (Come join us!) Votes to remove code should be because the PMC doesn't think the code is worth maintaining any more. I don't think that applies in this case. Aaron is a committer in Hadoop now and I'd strongly encourage you both to give your changes back to Apache instead of forking it into GitHub. -- Owen --0003255578768f6ff3049bfcfa45-- From general-return-3000-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 10:04:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11876 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 10:04:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 10:04:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 13094 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 10:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13041 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 10:04:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13033 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 10:04:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:04:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:04:18 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2392297iwn.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:03:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aiCo7NoBfekbfQiJrSyCjzcpPwQv9f3u87UEUUoxQCI=; b=X/ILtNpWE/691A8uh/+TXzJaDUqvt9VjWFdK1BfyCAbCO5J+3GvnVYGF2c1Fj3pjN+ 4Jbp7A0p3W/lmnD3vMknMbDUqyGRlE5xx1Pfpdvk9cwEA8joRM+ZD3IzvskeiCLGa9Wr 0tS2yxKX/V+Tdh0iY3n3B8vuyX20zeOVwKl2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gQbgN9Yzgc/oI9K+TbT7vHv4HHbrTI9ErDuI+Atm6zIx1Gd540U0tsPeigy/PfAJMT TZY6BwIPzdrIu/sDxRIIdWuMpO9wtS1+F75WvlO4DtxRvJTnyEoOQ/OMeTIjHphn1/V7 ibKfYTEaczq0ZKUs/f5tAoPYlnRY0KtZRvdY8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.178.193 with SMTP id bn1mr393634icb.14.1297418637452; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:03:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:03:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -1. Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop community, which would be good. If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own premises. Bernd On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/f= oundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start = a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdf= s. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that = nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long re= lease cycles, etc. =A0Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib = components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted = elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *de= fault* location for migrating these contrib projects. =A0Perhaps some shoul= d graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they= 're included in). =A0If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping o= f contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > =A0failmon > =A0hod > =A0test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > =A0capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0data_join > =A0dynamic-scheduler > =A0eclipse-plugin > =A0fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0gridmix > =A0index > =A0mrunit > =A0mumak > =A0raid > =A0sqoop > =A0streaming -- move to MR core? > =A0vaidya > =A0vertica > > > HDFS Contrib: > =A0fuse-dfs > =A0hdfsproxy > =A0thriftfs > > > Cheers, > Nige > From general-return-3001-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 10:29:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27391 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 10:29:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 10:29:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 46693 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 10:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46310 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 10:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46302 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 10:29:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:29:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:29:19 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2419624iyb.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:28:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mp4q3U4JzK1NYRhyWOEuNZQeJwBxL22LdeQFAHlIJoE=; b=V7HW2hJH/hJH0nBjAPQ6AK2V5nJsbcx4W/7QhkNpLztF135LcMPu/eYWz/Z1+zRyAA O7jOO71q72i0UqXWhTiCANmWMyn2yD8oLY5Y3Hq2c6gqOIWLKiY/bS/5h3v1D/8p0IpX 2aIA3aJL4e5rc+9vQ9Lq7Mwxzd9LzscF8p/Jg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CKr0zXGBPzq36XkIVWXM4OW/bqDJeGLjmSBqTJeVT8SrwfKTFHjWXfXZ/pjNmc7MQv WKC0t4xYzEX/mb6jHtr4wWHw6stTafWy0qlA+R0/845hE41KCEuqf6oABcq2XszU1XIu ZOi4eu8v6UTcovpqGqpyDdWB89dwYWP9mes94= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.230.137 with SMTP id jm9mr386804icb.282.1297420138292; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:28:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:28:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:28:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:33, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> >> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. = =A0It's >>>> last meaningful contribution was August 2010: >>>> >>> >>> -1 we still use and are maintaining this. >> >> >> Who's the 'we'? =A0Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was fail= ing a unit test for 7 months. =A0This is exactly the reason we should thoug= htfully consider whether it has a future within Hadoop. >> >> Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy? > > They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them.. any= chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it? Please keep in mind: The original author(s) would need to submit it - not a proxy. Bernd From general-return-3002-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 12:47:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93588 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 12:47:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 12:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 4888 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 12:47:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4330 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 12:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4321 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 12:47:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:47:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:47:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A99B7DB8 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:46:46 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GKboa9bCPPvA for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:46:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78D6B7D3B for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:46:35 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1298033181.61416@ZaOJysoEZnjwnnC7pHgrzQ Received: from [16.24.234.180] ([16.24.234.180]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p1BCkLcY027883 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:46:21 GMT Message-ID: <4D552F97.8090309@apache.org> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:46:15 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p1BCkLcY027883 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 11/02/2011 02:51, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was February 2009: > > HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. > > There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Available since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige +1 From general-return-3003-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 14:16:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35632 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 14:16:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 14:16:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 33194 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 14:16:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32769 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 14:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32761 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 14:16:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:16:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.93.165.11] (HELO cse-mail.unl.edu) (129.93.165.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:16:03 +0000 Received: from cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu (cse-barracuda.unl.edu [129.93.164.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse-mail.unl.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1BEFbm9014461 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:15:42 -0600 (CST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1297433737-4b5c0dbe3e3d-IjwG86 Received: from cse.unl.edu (cse.unl.edu [129.93.165.2]) by cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu with ESMTP id 91iE92kbqhLpiM87 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:15:37 -0600 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bbockelm@cse.unl.edu X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 129.93.165.2 Received: from pcp088890pcs.unl.edu (pcp088890pcs.unl.edu [129.93.158.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse.unl.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1BEFaqS008530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:15:36 -0600 From: Brian Bockelman X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 129.93.158.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-1285--848526120; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Subject: Re: Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:15:37 -0600 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Message-Id: <4269965E-D7A3-44BE-B85D-E1F4B6E97638@cse.unl.edu> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Barracuda-Connect: cse.unl.edu[129.93.165.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1297433737 X-Barracuda-URL: http://cse-barracuda.unl.edu:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at cse-mail X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.55028 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (cse-mail.unl.edu [129.93.165.11]); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:15:42 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1285--848526120 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii (Sorry, I apparently wasn't subscribed to general@hadoop... so this = response is going to muck up your email client's threading) We use fuse-dfs heavily at approximately 10 sites for the LHC; at least = 3 of them at the >1 petabyte level to deliver multiple terabytes of data = per day. However, as things have tended to be pretty stable in Hadoop-land, we = tend to lag significantly in versions, and I haven't noticed the JIRA = issues pile up. I volunteer to attempt to "tidy up house" in this contrib, propose the = vote be tabled for 2 months to allow me time for sufficient progress. = If I haven't been able to fix 18 lousy bugs by then, then I suppose I = deserve what I get ;). Brian= --Apple-Mail-1285--848526120 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIIKDCCA/gw ggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDESMBAGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAwMDBaFw0xMzAxMjUw ODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEg MB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYjYaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKC FciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3KlwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdL VG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0 yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4Vd Gy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNlaroPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3 rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4E FgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeow DwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLm ph5DBghZUVF8Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4v tQO1KDxgZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3Qghgk FIhmE1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCgwggMQoAMC AQICAwCvNzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPy LGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQD Ew1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDUyNDE4MTg0OVoXDTExMDUyNDE4MTg0OVowYTETMBEGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUx HzAdBgNVBAMTFkJyaWFuIEJvY2tlbG1hbiA1MDQzMDcwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAw ggEKAoIBAQCwiNKRMFRMWG+AJyo/G5bYisPndrH+44JqRHdxDzMaQP59gxrBO2koRwg/13gINe3e J8QL6bX4ANz/y1uglsytmoJwK5J9fxNYgJgbja83kO0j0HNL6oIyBhGStluaNTbiHrk8GA95M9VR XRqpYiwKvT1F0KS2r7sZ+PWevbAek787eTqg51yuvUUlIBPgTm1kV3vZs21oeIZUuw7wPGXBKN49 XqIDsamUIqiFARwPgqKR9eo6itlYy2NrHo0hHLXew37rEOcKv/0g4pI4J/y4+1qB7fN3nMkIMack FWfAQTngcnH/JpKmh8fmXdkeVv8EKYUXIgkUI5pb+Ak105olAgMBAAGjgeAwgd0wEQYJYIZIAYb4 QgEBBAQDAgWgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DA2BgNVHSAELzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqG SIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1UdHwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9l Z3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4LmNybDAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRiYm9ja2VsbUBjc2Uu dW5sLmVkdTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBTKGR0Sjm6kOF1C1DEOCNvZjRcNXTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOC AQEAlQSD+8Cvb0GxWqD4xhXd8Sl5MJRr1uJxMeGoMA4RZAJuyvVlBUx8v5moqY0XHMfNI+FulyMx wgOoNfvF3dluz3J4C/u5NvzfNqikLj++sL4XDaZoxSHLo9cJxVTcM15Gogct+kvIF1+msEsqLlNR /lqUVE/o8ANdD6PVx/044f/Dzi6s+6jZmBz/vWPI77ymT1EHaAkaHDqoNIlItPQrAHdkJWY67v1z s6mDrKaspF/2ThDdYax208o1oLFd8wY8kQUdTBlMmUAbchQnjOC9vH17w6meDc8VxD+pEL3vAiG2 JN2vzQ3IJCYTCTmagUyiLWHFEudH8Brn43NY0/HwKTGCAv0wggL5AgEBMHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT 8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFi MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTExMDIxMTE0MTUzN1ow IwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFIQCbO1lxenni1oV+L6IFZGUO5JbMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTET MBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MIGBBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERP RUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3Jp ZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAHzBjI2iu0t3lmw88IH4npqs8c9s0ddgXanp VIIXyJXiwmuc2EOj3m5oc1zReraLgP9BTzOyGA7kQhaRP2K5pJ1zsZ9Pqtuc8XxvQ/+F8VXkCrIu gOD/BlMY7xalgIhBKI1GPP/QA9Y2GyFYY/prko4tfdRSdNXreYPGoblOYkF4HEqZcMjFYKCp9vqf R2s4ShIuaLuJwMqo/N1VVlhELM6f17SGAghNRdVXqOXEXkWtkKUGHZgQWwQuL5zfwxzG/pv5mHkL ab6UJV6YmqbGDojjR2pqgdNo6wpPgxvOTYCZv2s3MRPCkjCgwgyhsunRpIw8nKYUMnzDJDqgvQGy XjAAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-1285--848526120-- From general-return-3004-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 15:13:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63500 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 15:13:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 15:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 40599 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 15:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40155 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 15:13:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40137 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 15:13:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.106] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:13:03 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1BFCgeo015560 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:12:43 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:12:43 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:12:42 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvJ/iFX00ZSNrPKTLiUKWpoe5V8rw== Message-ID: <22EA923E-F75A-42AD-84D2-D75D25AC94FC@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Hi All, > Votes to remove code should be because the PMC doesn't think the code is > worth maintaining any more. I don't think that applies in this case. Aaro= n > is a committer in Hadoop now and I'd strongly encourage you both to give > your changes back to Apache instead of forking it into GitHub. +1. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3005-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 15:34:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72414 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 15:34:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 15:34:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 86273 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 15:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85831 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 15:34:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85822 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 15:34:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:34:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:34:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 72252 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 15:33:41 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:33:41 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3491323bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.113.75 with SMTP id z11mr598362bkp.90.1297438419218; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.97.133 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> References: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64473187103049c036c0f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d64473187103049c036c0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: If a reasonable replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change your > vote? I believe some folks were interested in developing this elsewhere. > It would depend. As I have said before, our goal as a PMC is to produce useful Hadoop releases. Pulling out functionality that users require makes the Hadoop releases less useful. Making users go to 20 different sites to download compatible versions of the different components, although it helps aggregating companies like RedHat, is an anti-goal. That said, if projects are active enough splitting them out into other Apache projects makes sense. Chukwa, HBase, Hive, Hive, Pig, and Zookeeper are wonderful examples of related projects where we've moved them out of Hadoop and their communities are healthier for the move. Moving actively used components into non-Apache managed projects, including Apache Extras, is an anti-goal. -- Owen --0016e6d64473187103049c036c0f-- From general-return-3006-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 16:03:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89181 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 16:03:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 16:03:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 52397 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:03:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52030 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:03:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52020 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 16:03:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:03:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:02:55 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so1681866qwe.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.187.69 with SMTP id cv5mr792709vcb.200.1297440154517; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.210.70 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:02:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a538870317049c03d3bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba53a538870317049c03d3bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Owen: I think you make a fair point. The reason I think it still makes sense to bring mrunit out of Hadoop contrib is to: - start to simplify the build by breaking projects that are only clients of Hadoop libs out of contrib. - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the most important. I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave this within the ASF. Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily collaborate with others (and to use git). Thanks! On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Aaron Kimball >wrote: > > > +1. Eric Sammer and I will be working on this via github. (Come join us!) > > > Votes to remove code should be because the PMC doesn't think the code is > worth maintaining any more. I don't think that applies in this case. Aaron > is a committer in Hadoop now and I'd strongly encourage you both to give > your changes back to Apache instead of forking it into GitHub. > > -- Owen > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba53a538870317049c03d3bd-- From general-return-3007-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 16:48:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21833 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 16:48:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 16:48:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 42624 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42334 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42321 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 16:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.24] (HELO qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:48:35 +0000 Received: from omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6gSw1g00A16AWCUA2goDlQ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:48:13 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6go41g01T2SbwD58Sgo7bo; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:48:11 +0000 Message-Id: <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:48:03 -0800 References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the > most > important. If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in the 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. > I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave > this > within the ASF. Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system for non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. > Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > collaborate with others (and to use git). I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read- write git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at Apache than at github. -- Owen From general-return-3008-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 16:51:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23064 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 16:51:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 16:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 47101 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:51:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46852 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:51:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46840 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 16:51:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:51:22 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGG00KPIPGGJI60@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:50:42 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_06:2011-02-11,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110074 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:50:39 -0800 Message-id: <94C00012-C67B-437F-A905-012934F6B498@mac.com> References: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > If a reasonable replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change your >> vote? I believe some folks were interested in developing this elsewhere. >> > > It would depend. As I have said before, our goal as a PMC is to produce > useful Hadoop releases. Pulling out functionality that users require makes > the Hadoop releases less useful. Making users go to 20 different sites to > download compatible versions of the different components, although it helps > aggregating companies like RedHat, is an anti-goal. I wasn't aware that RedHat was producing an aggregated release. If these components are required, why are they in contrib? Feel free to start a vote to move this component to core or incubator. Why is this an anti-goal of Hadoop? Did you mean non-goal? Hadoop is NOT the Big Data Stack. We're not responsible for integrating Pig, HBase, Hive, ZK, and all these contribs into one package. If you'd like to propose a Big Data Stack integration project to the incubator I suspect you'll have a lot of support from folks in this community. That could be a really compelling project. Until that happens, there's obvious value for users to use an aggregated, integrated Big Data Stack type package from companies like Cloudera. > That said, if projects are active enough splitting them out into other > Apache projects makes sense. Chukwa, HBase, Hive, Hive, Pig, and Zookeeper > are wonderful examples of related projects where we've moved them out of > Hadoop and their communities are healthier for the move. Moving actively > used components into non-Apache managed projects, including Apache Extras, > is an anti-goal. We seem to have trouble creating releases of core Hadoop. Why saddle ourselves with these ancillary components that are not core? Sure, I'd love to see some of these move to incubator -- but I'm not signing up to do that. Cheers, Nige From general-return-3009-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 16:59:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26102 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 16:59:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 16:59:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 59309 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:59:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59000 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 16:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58986 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 16:59:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mcsrivas@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:59:22 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1702016vws.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:59:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OU0vcfBngX3cBAXMPqLnlb1bVrdvzTna6sk70JvCYrs=; b=ws0v7kSvsiiEC+5Fy+9vddOUFuGK0esQqVC/jaoqcB391K8Rn5G+9U8tRa6iXA0G3g nn/WXdNJwHOtbkPq7pFxsA6ECt+Lu58qfwkM1NhwFtUzH9+L0nTrD2dG8i0K35EHFJa0 CBAGBOVolbIL3x8YgXowSuffh22dWuMHFjDwo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Co32kkYAcmi0hIPtXt0HLbiMxuujnCFYGGMCQWMLas/0X6LnfXfJMzxUh8ApdKqHRF 2NON73NIF/8aOIQzNmL1sBhWnApdFC7hqxDn4L52Ab1VPcRFPqlxBh61gA2+j/8kaHPB o+Lt1PBePRGII6EeKKLKGUzjiGhB0/ZTNHEeU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.186.3 with SMTP id cq3mr903996vcb.20.1297443540316; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:59:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.193.1 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:59:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> References: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:59:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: "M. C. Srivas" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53aa5e56321a049c049d18 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba53aa5e56321a049c049d18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. > It's > >> last meaningful contribution was March 2010: > >> > > > > I think we should hold on to this one until there is a reasonable > > replacement. -1 > > If a reasonable replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change your > vote? I believe some folks were interested in developing this elsewhere. > Looks like lot of folks are using the current one, so why not wait until new one is submitted (and it works)? Just because there are bugs against fuse-dfs that haven't been fixed in a while doesn't make it useless. There are bugs open against Hadoop that haven't been worked on for a long time either. > > Nige > > --90e6ba53aa5e56321a049c049d18-- From general-return-3010-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:05:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34984 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:05:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 69213 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68916 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68904 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:05:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:05:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:05:16 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1707088vws.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:04:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.184.2 with SMTP id ci2mr888553vcb.162.1297443888558; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:04:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:04:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fbdf4188c20049c04b24d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba4fbdf4188c20049c04b24d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the most >> > > important. >> > > If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in the > 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independent of where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilitate light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public facing API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this with the exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touch non-public APIs. > I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave this >> within the ASF. >> > > Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system for > non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone suggested it to me initially. > Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > collaborate with others (and to use git). > I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-write > git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at > Apache than at github. > > -- Owen > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba4fbdf4188c20049c04b24d-- From general-return-3011-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:38:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50470 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:38:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:38:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 17710 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:38:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17433 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17425 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:38:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:38:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [129.93.165.11] (HELO cse-mail.unl.edu) (129.93.165.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:38:33 +0000 Received: from cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu (cse-barracuda.unl.edu [129.93.164.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse-mail.unl.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1BHc7r0007032 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:38:12 -0600 (CST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1297445886-4b5c0dbe46da-IjwG86 Received: from cse.unl.edu (cse.unl.edu [129.93.165.2]) by cse-barracuda.cse.unl.edu with ESMTP id NmvTwLabBhGZy1Qa for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:38:06 -0600 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bbockelm@cse.unl.edu X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 129.93.165.2 Received: from pcp088890pcs.unl.edu (pcp088890pcs.unl.edu [129.93.158.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by cse.unl.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1BHc6SX008418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:38:06 -0600 From: Brian Bockelman X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 129.93.158.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-1289--836377044; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:38:06 -0600 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib In-Reply-To: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <0437FB76-82C0-472D-94B5-1E01B8E94E77@mac.com> Message-Id: <9A9B8BB2-DBB6-4715-9234-496E90D44EF9@cse.unl.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Barracuda-Connect: cse.unl.edu[129.93.165.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1297445886 X-Barracuda-URL: http://cse-barracuda.unl.edu:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at cse-mail X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.55042 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (cse-mail.unl.edu [129.93.165.11]); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:38:12 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Status: Clean --Apple-Mail-1289--836377044 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1288--836377101 --Apple-Mail-1288--836377101 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:59 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>=20 >>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. >> It's >>>> last meaningful contribution was March 2010: >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I think we should hold on to this one until there is a reasonable >>> replacement. -1 >>=20 >> If a reasonable replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change = your >> vote? I believe some folks were interested in developing this = elsewhere. >>=20 >=20 > Looks like lot of folks are using the current one, so why not wait = until new > one is submitted (and it works)? >=20 > Just because there are bugs against fuse-dfs that haven't been fixed = in a > while doesn't make it useless. There are bugs open against Hadoop that > haven't been worked on for a long time either. >=20 Indeed - and I would volunteer to clean house if given the time. I've been browsing through the open issues. A lot could be knocked out = easily; most are improvement requests. The contrib is used by folks in the community; it works well for them. = Typically, it only will need to be updated when the libhdfs header = changes or when bugs are found. It can use some TLC, not removal. Brian --Apple-Mail-1288--836377101 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley <ndaley@mac.com> = wrote:


On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Owen O'Malley = wrote:

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Nigel Daley <ndaley@mac.com> = wrote:

I = think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib = component.
It's
last meaningful contribution was = March 2010:


I think we should hold on to = this one until there is a = reasonable
replacement. = -1

If a reasonable = replacement was developed elsewhere, would you change = your
vote?  I believe = some folks were interested in developing this = elsewhere.


Looks like lot of folks are using the = current one, so why not wait until new
one is submitted (and it = works)?

Just because there are bugs against fuse-dfs that haven't = been fixed in a
while doesn't make it useless. There are bugs open = against Hadoop that
haven't been worked on for a long time = either.


Inde= ed - and I would volunteer to clean house if given the = time.

I've been browsing through the open = issues.  A lot could be knocked out easily; most are improvement = requests.

The contrib is used by folks in the = community; it works well for them.  Typically, it only will need to = be updated when the libhdfs header changes or when bugs are found. =  It can use some TLC, not = removal.

Brian

= --Apple-Mail-1288--836377101-- --Apple-Mail-1289--836377044 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIIKDCCA/gw ggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDESMBAGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9y aXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAwMDBaFw0xMzAxMjUw ODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEg MB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEw ggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYjYaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKC FciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3KlwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdL VG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0 yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4Vd Gy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNlaroPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3 rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4E FgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeow DwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLm ph5DBghZUVF8Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4v tQO1KDxgZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3Qghgk FIhmE1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCgwggMQoAMC AQICAwCvNzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPy LGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQD Ew1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDUyNDE4MTg0OVoXDTExMDUyNDE4MTg0OVowYTETMBEGCgmS JomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUx HzAdBgNVBAMTFkJyaWFuIEJvY2tlbG1hbiA1MDQzMDcwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAw ggEKAoIBAQCwiNKRMFRMWG+AJyo/G5bYisPndrH+44JqRHdxDzMaQP59gxrBO2koRwg/13gINe3e J8QL6bX4ANz/y1uglsytmoJwK5J9fxNYgJgbja83kO0j0HNL6oIyBhGStluaNTbiHrk8GA95M9VR XRqpYiwKvT1F0KS2r7sZ+PWevbAek787eTqg51yuvUUlIBPgTm1kV3vZs21oeIZUuw7wPGXBKN49 XqIDsamUIqiFARwPgqKR9eo6itlYy2NrHo0hHLXew37rEOcKv/0g4pI4J/y4+1qB7fN3nMkIMack FWfAQTngcnH/JpKmh8fmXdkeVv8EKYUXIgkUI5pb+Ak105olAgMBAAGjgeAwgd0wEQYJYIZIAYb4 QgEBBAQDAgWgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF4DA2BgNVHSAELzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqG SIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1UdHwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9l Z3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4LmNybDAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRiYm9ja2VsbUBjc2Uu dW5sLmVkdTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBTKGR0Sjm6kOF1C1DEOCNvZjRcNXTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOC AQEAlQSD+8Cvb0GxWqD4xhXd8Sl5MJRr1uJxMeGoMA4RZAJuyvVlBUx8v5moqY0XHMfNI+FulyMx wgOoNfvF3dluz3J4C/u5NvzfNqikLj++sL4XDaZoxSHLo9cJxVTcM15Gogct+kvIF1+msEsqLlNR /lqUVE/o8ANdD6PVx/044f/Dzi6s+6jZmBz/vWPI77ymT1EHaAkaHDqoNIlItPQrAHdkJWY67v1z s6mDrKaspF/2ThDdYax208o1oLFd8wY8kQUdTBlMmUAbchQnjOC9vH17w6meDc8VxD+pEL3vAiG2 JN2vzQ3IJCYTCTmagUyiLWHFEudH8Brn43NY0/HwKTGCAv0wggL5AgEBMHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT 8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0 ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFi MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTExMDIxMTE3MzgwNlow IwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFEvT1driIBwO9w0Z+eZx/7lEXOncMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTET MBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MIGBBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERP RUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3Jp ZHMgQ0EgMQIDAK83MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAEZo+PRdAoXTrtL4osRwXKqxP63XlyL1X1/R mA3yPwZQxybdAMX97gNnld937NqEsFSCxdAqJEM3BxxYx6oaRSumZzh/prdOzccixKoDg/KC2iQj Qze35HW2B2nkAZJRmI5rl9VlHjTGWOuWCmqp/Y4lt6ol6R/50Lb80x5ooX9H9zmNdyCe5ZYOD8t5 zKpH9zdgutjAINrOVK1/c1U9r+mugJwzqIuh0b8AqtZkzmXFvIZk1fRm8Buy/4+tTjCNCwXM1adR VvrKzKNNzjMW9B2jizf1/gGB5GrTAbaoslWUaIA5xedykMLR1A4pl2cPvpCblYZ1Z/1NEwbuLvce jxAAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail-1289--836377044-- From general-return-3012-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:41:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51123 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:41:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:41:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22841 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:40:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22748 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:40:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22740 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:40:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:40:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:40:51 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=maTPG8evfkq2UyyhuGsTx9RJxXD7VAWCtngCMJF/m8AGFhdcuDbnLBOm yGqJUMXtq4mIy+gcUIcOf1VDHqMHfU0SBNWmZbOnKK6SjQHRChQzJBNDA uTNO8mG+Q9GWSZQ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297446048; x=1328982048; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=200.22=20Blockers|Date:=20Fri, =2011=20Feb=202011=2017:41:20=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<3D9E A200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<65133C54BF6D854D9057A3E553F5C4C4 @linkedin.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7D EBA1F3F0EA@mac.com>|References:=20<57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD6 5-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com>; bh=5eADLt+FAuJEs22YTeUN/6hB67LuLBeZmtFQlq2p2No=; b=w1xjMhqyVrZby/Bk+eOiUs7tp0JmznX2z5twfz10NA2+SpIeLb/D0SIk KHRQU9Ia+zdwnfoPUm5rPya3HXL5zMj9pADwzarV3kO4/LKap++iU5AHu zs2GLSbvN34OdP4; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,456,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20083137" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:41:21 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Thread-Topic: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Thread-Index: AQHLyb5E13M7p8Xx00aNwoGFZtJq/pP9GAOA Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:41:20 +0000 Message-ID: <3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com> References: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <65133C54BF6D854D9057A3E553F5C4C4@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Tom has created a public Jira filter for 0.22 blockers (thanks Tom!): > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=3Dhide&req= uestId=3D12313687 > With the new version of Jira, this single query across projects & version= s is now possible. >=20 > Looks like 26 issues marked blocker. 9 of them unassigned -- would love = to get those assigned. I'll start reviewing these issues more closely over= the weekend. Does this include the ones you unmarked as blockers for some mysterious re= ason? From general-return-3013-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:44:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52501 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:44:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30336 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30125 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30117 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:31 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [172.29.12.221] ([38.102.147.105]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGG0035MRXEFI20@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:02 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_06:2011-02-11,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110081 Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:02 -0800 Message-id: <03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8CF3-57B8DF00E9B8@mac.com> References: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> <3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Tom has created a public Jira filter for 0.22 blockers (thanks Tom!): >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12313687 >> With the new version of Jira, this single query across projects & versions is now possible. >> >> Looks like 26 issues marked blocker. 9 of them unassigned -- would love to get those assigned. I'll start reviewing these issues more closely over the weekend. > > Does this include the ones you unmarked as blockers for some mysterious reason? To which issues are you referring exactly? From general-return-3014-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:44:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52598 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 31609 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31512 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31504 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:44:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.109] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:48 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1BHiPtd000771 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:25 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.72]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:25 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:24 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvKE1LnpNwZY2ONTaS1jQcAsBWSCw== Message-ID: <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for MRUni= t, I would be happy to help. Cheers, Chris On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >=20 >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>=20 >> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the most >>>=20 >>=20 >> important. >>>=20 >>=20 >> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in th= e >> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >=20 >=20 > I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independent = of > where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilitate > light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public facing > API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this with = the > exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touch > non-public APIs. >=20 >=20 >> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave this >>> within the ASF. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system f= or >> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >=20 >=20 > Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone > suggested it to me initially. >=20 >=20 >> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>=20 >=20 > I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-write >> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at >> Apache than at github. >>=20 >=20 >> -- Owen >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3015-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:47:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52972 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:47:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 37584 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:47:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36452 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36194 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:47:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:47:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:47:18 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=nb+qmdTqCNsVbdNVU+U4lBEUw1iuf5yfUIkLnO7Xbk6i7wQuidnsigBQ fRMRvTYN5ZO3QEIo7f5l50e+PdjkEOgqUDfl2uWDLt45+B0vSiDMxkwYK XEWBF5eA4MZ8GGM; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297446433; x=1328982433; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20hod=20Common=20contr ib|Date:=20Fri,=2011=20Feb=202011=2017:48:22=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<93ACD9280A292747AE4F56B05B826CE2@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20; bh=t+RWGsXiIe2fWhxkSBk+uuNE7e2Lfc6L6pgEhsMXP5k=; b=kmFCnkTsyosw9kja2Fw2eyoBkVb9mzgbnTKkOefKTt30Kuxn2C+sIBcr 5H2HqyPPtHDmnZxn45n4ozG1CPBIMMZq72oMrvXDqoGZZjI9MVrTuNKdO l0ghE1SgBElt8Kx; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,456,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20658572" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:48:23 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyZbt98XqvxdoQkW+Mjf3xnP4gZP9GkiA Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:48:22 +0000 Message-ID: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <93ACD9280A292747AE4F56B05B826CE2@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's la= st meaningful contribution was February 2009: >=20 > HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop service= s provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. >=20 > There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Avail= able since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). -1 a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including it wo= uld likely only be a burden on the tarball size. b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the topic co= ming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months or so and has f= or years. Can't say that about the other contrib modules other than the sc= hedulers and streaming. c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that we've ign= ored. d) With SGE in flux, there is no equivalent functionality as far as I'm awa= re. From general-return-3016-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 17:55:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54832 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 17:55:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 17:55:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 51865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:54:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51587 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 17:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51571 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 17:54:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:54:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:54:49 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2730374wwd.29 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:54:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YWdwO6cTNg2/9ERPFoEf4rpWbqOhoGSfimENE2bwrko=; b=CvfuE+TWWFRAOwM+sHNUGHvnekWh6qa4GQa8kztjToUH1pzJhF3kGkTbGbtzgs4nQu Clq6nO2W8PmnbKO7KIJAkVQr5CNu033dFphkf1ucBad7GtkTu2fBOyAOJ93tdliuYa6M pZoeIuO7cnAZsNrRoTeh+wbwpmFLBal1sJzVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ec89c+bBAhCAnxc0Zu/sYS+4p9rOy6dTJzbU8ZsAPyy8uKO/hufLqmZ77godZ2bOXD P5+Qg6KS3cMFYSfojJYYra4+oVq6K94q26qor+Qr5myWWmmj9TXeJwpgBHEZmetWJcp5 Mdbz9fUQ17gYl976VyuhjVuH0TB9eJw/xoA/M= Received: by 10.216.165.204 with SMTP id e54mr815110wel.48.1297446867194; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:54:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.193 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:54:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:54:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Tom On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. =A0It's = last meaningful contribution was February 2009: > > HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop service= s provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. > > There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Avail= able since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-3017-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 18:12:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68876 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 18:12:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 18:12:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 93470 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:12:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93338 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93324 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 18:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:42 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2767591wye.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DMkSha7jqNaVHffk/Je6C8y3oCcL6M+hdrYKFSrRxPA=; b=vp38Y0mT5RvfexgCI6n9j/POFRh0nv+zXTF2G85c6/RRFWiX4mVC7tt6tXU7+bw2ay uE1Ur5eYg8tGNw+QjjfHaTXNYE3bs9WtDdSvVaFh65+SWCi55GQq60UI9IKNOLykULsv wGe0r6Qmp4Apfg+a4djq02ZBzh8ttwXJc2k+U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rlbh0WZKBs0nxNFiod1VmKvWiia5njgLXXBo5YTc4FHfAvmSWJF5xQEjvMPUoPXdn+ xmECGVDq4PhJ5pTzotzXnQo5x9F7nA+Or+xTjaHwXWMGADkjlZvlUIBbwZeuxFE8//NF GefD9uaN6rkLmxdbsaV1q8Ioyqfvcza6doM0o= Received: by 10.216.55.145 with SMTP id k17mr832868wec.48.1297447941593; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:12:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.193 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:12:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:12:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what ZooKeeper does, for example. Tom On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > -1. > > Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better > (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within > the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop > community, which would be good. > If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, > it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. > > AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the > related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own > premises. > > =A0Bernd > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/= foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start= a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hd= fs. >> >> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that= nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long r= elease cycles, etc. =A0Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib= components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted= elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *d= efault* location for migrating these contrib projects. =A0Perhaps some shou= ld graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project the= y're included in). =A0If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping = of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >> >> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any)= . >> >> Common Contrib: >> =A0failmon >> =A0hod >> =A0test >> >> >> MapReduce Contrib: >> =A0capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >> =A0data_join >> =A0dynamic-scheduler >> =A0eclipse-plugin >> =A0fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >> =A0gridmix >> =A0index >> =A0mrunit >> =A0mumak >> =A0raid >> =A0sqoop >> =A0streaming -- move to MR core? >> =A0vaidya >> =A0vertica >> >> >> HDFS Contrib: >> =A0fuse-dfs >> =A0hdfsproxy >> =A0thriftfs >> >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> > From general-return-3018-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 18:21:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70563 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 18:21:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 18:21:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:21:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7716 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7708 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 18:21:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:21:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:21:04 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2755703wwd.29 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:20:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pRLDeaRkHFzblmgw3tvWYOBz9Uf8eABJHA1mO9UQe88=; b=U7YYXqcAmSg7NuiXTRjNuP2r4mfyGI5aewtkHYYiefXjUnoO3NI8WKXSslpOEj78ms SYnSEZzAdmnBhzGNEnQhKLoCQ9FoNNH+Y77zUZhhY8ZwD2TOeXz350kGysBTs45/JSX0 NJAt24eG4XRqiyFRHHUrGhgPwxCdVNRi686ig= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j1oABDu9YTKLWI2sbdPUQS1u/mzn+imETV/43DqVrmtQ6EediF9L4x0Z9WCGc0kfXt whNb0L2Zjn8dgsUH/casuug53mEZM8SHygls3gdiqyVAW3RX47Ur0Qj7UebVqrRZG/NG vXp4Nqn64B7XeC91J45rDTnNbuMfRWEPH6SH0= Received: by 10.216.173.147 with SMTP id v19mr792892wel.102.1297446546459; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:49:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.193 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:48:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:48:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon thriftfs HDFS contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the thriftfs HDFS contrib component. =A0It= 's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August 2008: > > HADOOP-3754. Add a thrift interface to access HDFS. (dhruba via omalley) > > There are 5 unresolved contrib/thriftfs issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch A= vailable since November 2009 (HDFS-789). > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > From general-return-3019-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 18:26:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78086 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 18:26:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 18:26:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12867 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:26:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12710 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 18:26:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12673 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 18:26:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wugarrett@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:26:46 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3671492bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=r+0anfbvbUCXsylHfC5gAgVlOEDE47ymELQ0jOZy6t4=; b=luyyJXt1uRfrLChn50n7P90mpbgMVA/otnBV1XTsLXHQklqetRZVuiQYDN5sR26lB1 2r1iFNAkf6o0TrGNMEETOFY8mII+7mQxrNWXNsscaZ70MJxA6fwyMKc47ckamX/ztJh2 Ce4QK5CNAEh0nVXGNmhHgIC1+DWAPYWUrC0uQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BNyhG9Ks203v0+WdYeitdWfcqfnuT+eMdbYsUDQyiojq5PNFD5hQuG5ORI6a86Cnxc NH4un5VM1Z6uUGlUK8QQCO2gyqCaLTHbigsct0kYnK3Hzf0hLFS7FehY6OD+CGfdRVd+ TO3I4DJe8iI6HwTo+sdcxSS/bSbD0oHGX4D7o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.76.207 with SMTP id d15mr13035070bkk.104.1297448785756; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.80.6 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:26:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Garrett Wu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636499889fd4201049c05d5ef X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636499889fd4201049c05d5ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > > > - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the most > >> > > > > important. > >> > > > > If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in the > > 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. > > > I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independent of > where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilitate > light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public facing > API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this with > the > exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touch > non-public APIs. > > +1 for a faster release cycle and using git. I have a couple of patches for mrunit, and it would be nice to get those in separately from hadoop releases. > > > I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave this > >> within the ASF. > >> > > > > Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system > for > > non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. > > > Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone > suggested it to me initially. > > > > Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > > collaborate with others (and to use git). > > > > I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-write > > git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at > > Apache than at github. > > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > --001636499889fd4201049c05d5ef-- From general-return-3020-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 19:38:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7342 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:38:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:38:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 95176 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95072 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95062 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:38:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:38:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.216.154 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.216.154] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.216.154) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:37:58 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p1BJbZkQ003092 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (from apache@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.4/Submit) id p1BJbZLZ003091 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:37:35 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: apache set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from 10.173.214.212 ([10.173.214.212]) by mail.cs.ucf.edu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:37:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:37:35 -0500 From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 As a university researcher for file systems, having the fuse-dfs code makes life easy when trying to run i/o benchmark apps. I would hate to see it go. Here's my -1 - Grant Quoting Nigel Daley : > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. > It's last meaningful contribution was March 2010: > > HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli Collins. > > There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of > them Patch Available. > > Here is my +1. > > Nige > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From general-return-3021-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 19:46:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9436 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 5646 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5386 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5378 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:38 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1832094vws.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.186.195 with SMTP id ct3mr1120299vcb.57.1297453576743; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> References: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:46:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385 --90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I see these votes as a desire to simply not develop this code under the Hadoop project, not to kill the code base. I believe the general intention is to "clean up" the project so it passes the "do one thing and do it well" rule (or "develop one thing and develop it well"). Projects that are related such as fuse-dfs, mrunit, and so on should and must exist. The question (and vote) is simply should it be within Hadoop proper. I think they can thrive in the incubator or wherever the majority of active contributors wish to host it (although Owen has made the good point about visibility and community development features of the ASF). My (non-binding) vote is +1. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Grant Mackey wrote: > As a university researcher for file systems, having the fuse-dfs code makes > life easy when trying to run i/o benchmark apps. I would hate to see it go. > Here's my -1 > > - Grant > > > Quoting Nigel Daley : > > I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. It's >> last meaningful contribution was March 2010: >> >> HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli >> Collins. >> >> There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of them >> Patch Available. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> Nige >> >> > > > Grant Mackey > UCF Research Assistant > Engineering III > Rm 238 Cubicle 1 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba53a8968deb3b049c06f385-- From general-return-3022-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 19:46:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9521 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:46:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 6868 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6782 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6774 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.109] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:46:38 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1BJkGv6018705 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:16 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:46:15 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon fuse-dfs HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AcvKJFhzszlhVGf9Ryy1fQbpTsmB7Q== Message-ID: <8DFFD4D7-918D-499F-A814-8A2DBD0D6823@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110211143735.38602fmir0zmqi3o@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -1 (not binding) as well. Cheers, Chris On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Grant Mackey wrote: > As a university researcher for file systems, having the fuse-dfs code =20 > makes life easy when trying to run i/o benchmark apps. I would hate to =20 > see it go. Here's my -1 >=20 > - Grant >=20 > Quoting Nigel Daley : >=20 >> I think the PMC should abandon the fuse-dfs HDFS contrib component. =20 >> It's last meaningful contribution was March 2010: >>=20 >> HDFS-961. dfs_readdir incorrectly parses paths. Contributed by Eli Colli= ns. >>=20 >> There are 18 unresolved contrib/fuse-dfs issues in Jira, none of =20 >> them Patch Available. >>=20 >> Here is my +1. >>=20 >> Nige >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Grant Mackey > UCF Research Assistant > Engineering III > Rm 238 Cubicle 1 >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3023-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 19:52:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10929 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:52:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:52:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 15269 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15220 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15212 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:52:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:52:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 10712 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:52:27 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:52:27 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2923860iwn.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:52:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.177.74 with SMTP id bh10mr1187234icb.159.1297453946960; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.174.193 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:52:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:52:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Patrick Hunt To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for MRU= nit, I would be happy to help. I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would also be happy to be a mentor. Patrick > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wro= te: >> >>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>> >>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the mos= t >>>> >>> >>> important. >>>> >>> >>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in t= he >>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >> >> >> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independent= of >> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilitat= e >> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public facin= g >> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this with= the >> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touch >> non-public APIs. >> >> >>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave thi= s >>>> within the ASF. >>>> >>> >>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system = for >>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >> >> >> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >> suggested it to me initially. >> >> >>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>> >> >> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-writ= e >>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at >>> Apache than at github. >>> >> >>> -- Owen >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: =A0 http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > From general-return-3024-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 19:58:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11992 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 19:58:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 19:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20064 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20020 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 19:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20012 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 19:58:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:58:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.109] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:58:05 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1BJvgXd026150 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:57:43 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:57:43 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:57:41 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvKJfEofw+8XlXUSzekMZNhhEnanQ== Message-ID: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Awesome Patrick, we'd probably need one more active mentor. Any takers? After we get that, then we cook up a proposal on the Incubator wiki here [1= ], and follow the process here [2] to get started... Cheers, Chris [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for MR= Unit, I would be happy to help. >=20 > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > also be happy to be a mentor. >=20 > Patrick >=20 >>=20 >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>=20 >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wr= ote: >>>=20 >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the mo= st >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> important. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in = the >>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independen= t of >>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilita= te >>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public faci= ng >>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this wit= h the >>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touc= h >>> non-public APIs. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave th= is >>>>> within the ASF. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system= for >>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >>> suggested it to me initially. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-wri= te >>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier a= t >>>> Apache than at github. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> -- Owen >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Eric Sammer >>> twitter: esammer >>> data: www.cloudera.com >>=20 >>=20 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>=20 >>=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3025-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 21:04:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41451 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 21:04:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 21:04:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 28849 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 21:04:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28790 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 21:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28780 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 21:04:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:04:21 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3824458bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:04:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+l3f6l//mBHlp2njVtXVJvbF9YdO61n0d+r0c1o16Q4=; b=JFlUNjFblPEpI7w9i+92tJFlNW1URkg+6AqxFbHsXC35LbL6uR7yW4jcn3sTa8Wv5b bAHtnmHose1DdGLNodhAYixuuH0zd6Rl5Gkzn7qQddjD6yjB1kvbBBA6XWoSWC3NDQOu Py27MghAszquM/Zp8FNgVYM3Ze7CyWowLQsFE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=CM4EBzGDIhDm4xhUkuHxEpV9B6Zf4AoXA608di0UrjowkEfeX32qPmRuksBYu8HimH namWEBPTUGyj1GyeStOUGtDf/kBpV/N9p/I40dgCTg0T4WYSuNljAFu0+t7TxkVZsOxM CBMmywiwWFDbMPEwDEB5eBMkth3sUP2waSeec= Received: by 10.204.117.77 with SMTP id p13mr927512bkq.19.1297458241223; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:04:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:03:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:03:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d647db943c46049c0809ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d647db943c46049c0809ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Tom, How do these contrib components get released then? If the intent of having the code is to eventually produce release artifacts that people can use, then allowing them to further degrade in releasability seems antithetical to the point of keeping the source around. I think users who download Hadoop would be surprised to find that tools/projects under contrib do not operate as advertised. If the point of retaining the code would be instead to have it as an example for future developers to reference, then maybe it would be better to move them into an "attic" or "unmaintaned" directory so it is clear that we do not expect these to stay up to date. If we do expect them to work, and believe that they belong in the project, then I think we need to keep them building -- and yes, that adds to the burden associated with the release of Hadoop as a whole. - Aaron On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Tom White wrote: > For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we > remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib > component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what > ZooKeeper does, for example. > > Tom > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann > wrote: > > -1. > > > > Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better > > (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within > > the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop > > community, which would be good. > > If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, > > it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. > > > > AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the > > related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own > > premises. > > > > Bernd > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Folks, > >> > >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched ( > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) > I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, > mapreduce, and hdfs. > >> > >> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that > nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long > release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib > components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted > elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural > *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some > should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project > they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping > of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > >> > >> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss > any). > >> > >> Common Contrib: > >> failmon > >> hod > >> test > >> > >> > >> MapReduce Contrib: > >> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > >> data_join > >> dynamic-scheduler > >> eclipse-plugin > >> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > >> gridmix > >> index > >> mrunit > >> mumak > >> raid > >> sqoop > >> streaming -- move to MR core? > >> vaidya > >> vertica > >> > >> > >> HDFS Contrib: > >> fuse-dfs > >> hdfsproxy > >> thriftfs > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > >> > > > --0016e6d647db943c46049c0809ec-- From general-return-3026-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 22:10:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88934 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 22:10:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 22:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 8354 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:10:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8298 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:10:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8290 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 22:10:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:10:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:10:50 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3880588bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:10:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=UW0NPCWCGV6W+aqwhKyImfO0NzbSP4kstpf3kHpvxdA=; b=AvmQRRhVuYc4zUJGAmeqZb5/pq28D0yPXDN4G/AsxOY8ooXwFuEWIXcSQt78/vH8CE oKkbxVMeIzN3s0kjDwN1Z1HfJravf7f3FJQyrqwiD2otpC/pv1+H8swAuS+55dbpyDBq GbGUVREKsPZR7AFCvN+DfwElPVdEfOv1/OipY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Yt9ZDpURG/9NnZFfOHgQGpB6DiMIn6gyMsJBO7erz9uawn9qefLfgVDyQ5fv2cgz+D lTdUL+g38ersq/CbIenXj4QG7NS164cnIp+hOXNhFh2FZGDB0wPMKO9/o7Fap/JJditG eVVM8+gKFLnVfeBNcH0DRasNQzwinDQEGNqT4= Received: by 10.204.82.84 with SMTP id a20mr11415865bkl.154.1297462225809; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:10:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:10:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:10:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e355143344049c08f71a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7e355143344049c08f71a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in the best interest of its users. MRUnit is valuable to users of several different versions of Hadoop. But MRUnit has only ever been committed to version 0.21 and above -- even though in practice, the majority (dare I say--all) of its users are running on 0.20. The only place today to get a version of MRUnit compatible with 0.20 has been through a Cloudera release, which backported the entire MRUnit patchset. My thoughts on MRUnit in 0.20.100 resonate with Eric's. There will be further fixes to MRUnit and its lightweight codebase can be released far more rapidly than whenever the next 0.20.1xx release of Hadoop would occur. Given that MRUnit has already been in the repository since April 2009 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5518) and has yet to see an Apache 0.20-based release, I do not think it is in the best interest of the library's userbase to couple MRUnit's release cycle to that of Hadoop itself. Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client library that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. Regards, - Aaron On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Awesome Patrick, we'd probably need one more active mentor. Any takers? > > After we get that, then we cook up a proposal on the Incubator wiki here > [1], and follow the process here [2] to get started... > > Cheers, > Chris > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > > wrote: > >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for > MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > > > > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > > also be happy to be a mentor. > > > > Patrick > > > >> > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >>>> > >>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the > most > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> important. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in > the > >>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). > Independent of > >>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to > facilitate > >>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public > facing > >>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this > with the > >>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or > touch > >>> non-public APIs. > >>> > >>> > >>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave > this > >>>>> within the ASF. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system > for > >>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. > >>> > >>> > >>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone > >>> suggested it to me initially. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > >>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). > >>>> > >>> > >>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support > read-write > >>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier > at > >>>> Apache than at github. > >>>> > >>> > >>>> -- Owen > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Eric Sammer > >>> twitter: esammer > >>> data: www.cloudera.com > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > --0016e6d7e355143344049c08f71a-- From general-return-3027-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 22:27:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98147 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 22:27:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 22:27:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27141 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:27:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26556 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26548 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 22:27:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:27:10 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1935168vws.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:26:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.73.194 with SMTP id r2mr1316889vcj.267.1297463208731; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:26:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:26:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363107b3aa6c75049c09315b --0016363107b3aa6c75049c09315b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just to add to the option of going to incubator, I'm fine with that as well. Github was an easy thing to get started and I was under the impression we needed some greater degree of committer diversity and, frankly, a bigger project. If mrunit is a candidate, keeping this under the ASF umbrella is more than fine with me. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I > believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in the > best interest of its users. > > MRUnit is valuable to users of several different versions of Hadoop. But > MRUnit has only ever been committed to version 0.21 and above -- even > though > in practice, the majority (dare I say--all) of its users are running on > 0.20. The only place today to get a version of MRUnit compatible with 0.20 > has been through a Cloudera release, which backported the entire MRUnit > patchset. > > My thoughts on MRUnit in 0.20.100 resonate with Eric's. There will be > further fixes to MRUnit and its lightweight codebase can be released far > more rapidly than whenever the next 0.20.1xx release of Hadoop would occur. > Given that MRUnit has already been in the repository since April 2009 (see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5518) and has yet to see an > Apache 0.20-based release, I do not think it is in the best interest of the > library's userbase to couple MRUnit's release cycle to that of Hadoop > itself. > > Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not > require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client library > that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. > > My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can > derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this > role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I > believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and > continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. > > Regards, > - Aaron > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < > chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > Awesome Patrick, we'd probably need one more active mentor. Any takers? > > > > After we get that, then we cook up a proposal on the Incubator wiki here > > [1], and follow the process here [2] to get started... > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal > > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html > > > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > > > wrote: > > >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for > > MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > > > > > > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > > > also be happy to be a mentor. > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > >> > > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the > > most > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> important. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion > in > > the > > >>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). > > Independent of > > >>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to > > facilitate > > >>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public > > facing > > >>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this > > with the > > >>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or > > touch > > >>> non-public APIs. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave > > this > > >>>>> within the ASF. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting > system > > for > > >>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone > > >>> suggested it to me initially. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > > >>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support > > read-write > > >>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier > > at > > >>>> Apache than at github. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>>> -- Owen > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Eric Sammer > > >>> twitter: esammer > > >>> data: www.cloudera.com > > >> > > >> > > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > >> Senior Computer Scientist > > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> > > >> > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --0016363107b3aa6c75049c09315b-- From general-return-3028-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 22:44:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2627 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 22:44:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 22:44:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 50169 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50037 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:44:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50019 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 22:44:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:44:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:44:15 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3906109bwz.35 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:43:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=75PvP40dK7zS4bE+7DlElkdiSyZwA+uHcZIzdMK4mY4=; b=Xb+JA3XJYdOoKlyVlrdfxeBJmOtZiP99bNu4CcPTIIVK1mkQcvpv1ukNmzThI3bOjg M+G3WG/2UsM6hB9iGsHMrXzI7clEINfpkCFUKM/8XKKpef5nBp7suHiqxkwr+/muJH1G CAmhxyN7jjmAl12pBdNym3RROu1MNjXT7M2EA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=rO4Gd0kSpG3yWJlYlQ7Y92JG2/SgHhR3wZqpnq0btKS18oxovGq7DjX7Q2etPA1O5s +z/C+U9EZIBs8VQOJqUwWoCq3gK/gkXDLCj4c8C9SIP3iC7XdhKLITewVNUqAkEz5Kgz RZbfZBHNQgc8+mm9a5grKDodol6+OM7pzPs0E= Received: by 10.204.59.72 with SMTP id k8mr2377489bkh.208.1297464235133; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:43:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.54.72 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:43:35 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:43:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: SF Hadoop meetup report To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5b174d80dd8049c096ec7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5b174d80dd8049c096ec7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, This week we held the second SF Hadoop meetup. About 70 individuals attended, and we again had several great discussions in parallel, using the same unconference format as the first meetup in January. The following break-out sessions were held: * Hadoop and Workflow Systems * Feeding Hadoop * Contributing to Hadoop and Related Projects * Hive Q&A * Hadoop + RDBMS * Hadoop and Predictive Analytics * Hadoop in Amazon * HBase: What is the sweet spot? * Hardware for Hadoop * Hadoop Security For some discussions, summary notes are available; these will be posted at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/messages/boards/ Thanks again to our hosts at CBS Interactive for providing the space for this meetup. I would also like to thank the discussion facilitators, and all the attendees for contributing to the success of the discussions. Stay tuned for the next SF Hadoop meetup announcement! Sign up at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/ Regards, - Aaron Kimball --001636c5b174d80dd8049c096ec7-- From general-return-3029-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 11 22:57:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5531 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2011 22:56:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2011 22:56:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 66245 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:56:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66208 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2011 22:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66200 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2011 22:56:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:56:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.243] (HELO qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:56:49 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6mYZ1g0031swQuc5DmwVNf; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:56:29 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6mwK1g01m2SbwD53bmwNqR; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:56:27 +0000 Message-Id: <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:56:18 -0800 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several > person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git > repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our > sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. As Eric mentioned, we have several person years worth of development to contribute to Apache. Arun has started that process by creating the branch-0.20-security branch. I plan on pushing the individual patches to branch-0.20-security-patches and then when it is identical with Arun's branch, I'll rename mine to branch-0.20-security. I also plan to start pushing the hadoop-future work into a branch called yahoo-merge(?) as individual commits from our internal git repository. The goal of creating the branch is to enable faster review and discussion. These patches will be individually run through the jira, review, and commit process to be added to trunk. -- Owen From general-return-3030-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 00:56:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60218 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 00:56:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 00:56:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 75890 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 00:56:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75828 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 00:56:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75820 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 00:56:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:56:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:56:33 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so3059623wwd.29 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:56:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=54RbqBJnNbB7VM+Pgp5YMHIiMZZTC7/xNbbbpvgak08=; b=RjL3KUVkXzLNGCNhEd+dkw1xDfHW23sJFjSD2wyB7hO8iuYjgM8pcoW2ym0d6ufzWR D04uuLWF04b5HfzzUhshlt7STEsU8NAb89p+yIfb808U1jmHmiE88eVxiMcI7igZKzHP RP/GNh0PG9tipPrZDoVNJVKm9c54DNLuDZyeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=srWyRse5h+QNecF1fQjN3MqxzDnjMQLMw5ovdUogRUew0ZUnHD/8rExHIm49xPP1Nt V3rCfEExgzhU4En6DlYhf9CbNYRaDhCAfIOT5PUgeXi3q+8TTV+RKzGCFKSpCStzAz0w Agdxfi7rr75wJZDeSoysRdlXZVsVJgw91TMsI= Received: by 10.216.173.147 with SMTP id v19mr1290602wel.102.1297472171472; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:56:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.193 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:55:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tom White Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:55:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote= : > Tom, > > How do these contrib components get released then? In source form - this is what ZooKeeper does. > If the intent of having > the code is to eventually produce release artifacts that people can use, > then allowing them to further degrade in releasability seems antithetical= to > the point of keeping the source around. I think users who download Hadoop > would be surprised to find that tools/projects under contrib do not opera= te > as advertised. > > If the point of retaining the code would be instead to have it as an exam= ple > for future developers to reference, then maybe it would be better to move > them into an "attic" or "unmaintaned" directory so it is clear that we do > not expect these to stay up to date. If we do expect them to work, and > believe that they belong in the project, then I think we need to keep the= m > building -- and yes, that adds to the burden associated with the release = of > Hadoop as a whole. Maybe. We haven't always done a great job of this though. > > - Aaron > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Tom White wrote= : > >> For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we >> remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib >> component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what >> ZooKeeper does, for example. >> >> Tom >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann >> wrote: >> > -1. >> > >> > Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better >> > (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within >> > the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop >> > community, which would be good. >> > If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, >> > it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. >> > >> > AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the >> > related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own >> > premises. >> > >> > =A0Bernd >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched ( >> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation= _launches) >> I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of commo= n, >> mapreduce, and hdfs. >> >> >> >> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures t= hat >> nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long >> release cycles, etc. =A0Most folks I've talked with agree that these con= trib >> components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and host= ed >> elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural >> *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. =A0Perhaps some >> should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the proj= ect >> they're included in). =A0If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a ma= pping >> of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >> >> >> >> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss >> any). >> >> >> >> Common Contrib: >> >> =A0failmon >> >> =A0hod >> >> =A0test >> >> >> >> >> >> MapReduce Contrib: >> >> =A0capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >> >> =A0data_join >> >> =A0dynamic-scheduler >> >> =A0eclipse-plugin >> >> =A0fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >> >> =A0gridmix >> >> =A0index >> >> =A0mrunit >> >> =A0mumak >> >> =A0raid >> >> =A0sqoop >> >> =A0streaming -- move to MR core? >> >> =A0vaidya >> >> =A0vertica >> >> >> >> >> >> HDFS Contrib: >> >> =A0fuse-dfs >> >> =A0hdfsproxy >> >> =A0thriftfs >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nige >> >> >> > >> > From general-return-3031-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 02:11:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95035 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 02:11:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 02:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 37531 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 02:11:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37420 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 02:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37412 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 02:11:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:11:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:11:17 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGH00LKGFDV0300@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:10:44 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_09:2011-02-11,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110167 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:10:43 -0800 Message-id: <57A8F207-B566-48FB-8D84-E115C593DED2@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This component has been removed with Jira HADOOP-7136. Thanks, Nige On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008: > > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba) > > Here is my +1. > > Nige From general-return-3032-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 02:18:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95810 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 02:18:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 02:18:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 41170 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 02:18:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40961 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 02:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40953 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 02:18:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:18:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:18:42 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGH005IIFPRUP70@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:17:51 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-11_09:2011-02-11,2011-02-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110168 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:17:50 -0800 Message-id: <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last meaningful contribution was February 2009: >> >> HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi. >> >> There are 44 unresolved contrib/hod issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch Available since November 2009 (HADOOP-6369). > > -1 > > a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds have dependencies on python. > b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib modules other than the schedulers and streaming. Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work with 0.20 or beyond. > c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that we've ignored. Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. Nige From general-return-3033-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 03:28:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13849 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 03:28:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 03:28:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 78548 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 03:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78056 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 03:28:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78048 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 03:28:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:28:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:28:33 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so3119390wwd.29 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:28:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NLDgwJb0EWHN5yZnRw2kUu2UYYhbzK4QFqz51m5wZMU=; b=OImZAuf9DejzPpSEKD88S7QvjxQDyUZ/ujY7E+C+Kvw6vI42YBzLuRJxezhht3GWiJ yxEkmpIJRlTwi7ecWeNICzpk+9vYqNKlY3za9X3TtMz2kNsNf8rReobSwzrNPQI8R69S SPibQ0tEViWvsYuT7mtB0ByAxtbvy2ynWNo9U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mbGNmdC+nCjzw1NMgcZOqK+8vcKOlm7vDwFpB29UzuOl0aUmCB84EmGE9fXVIo7D2z MlXMF78XOBeOZB71hq2RR8xr81v0ReV7vWOv+M5H21xoZPIBZw7H9YsF1UlHx8PjXbpQ 32pcB5unZxTBy/ONFEGCLCSoBIhsz991yW9vE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.20.141 with SMTP id p13mr1398474wep.102.1297481293375; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.185.135 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:28:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:28:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon thriftfs HDFS contrib From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646da74982a80049c0d679f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163646da74982a80049c0d679f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +0. we are using this in production, but sadly I never had any time to keep it updated. I have a plan of integrating the generated Thrift server-stubs with the namenode itself, so that the NameNode can expose Hadoop RPC as well as Thrift RPC. But this is something for the future, so I am fine either way if we decide to remove it or to keep it as it is. thanks, dhruba On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Tom White wrote: > +1 > > Tom > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > I think the PMC should abandon the thriftfs HDFS contrib component. It's > last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August 2008: > > > > HADOOP-3754. Add a thrift interface to access HDFS. (dhruba via omalley) > > > > There are 5 unresolved contrib/thriftfs issues in Jira, 1 of them Patch > Available since November 2009 (HDFS-789). > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > Nige > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --00163646da74982a80049c0d679f-- From general-return-3034-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 05:16:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45848 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 05:16:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 05:16:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 9260 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8710 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:16:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8697 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 05:16:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:16:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:16:14 +0000 Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6tEC1g0041ZMdJ4AEtFsMS; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:15:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.50] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6tFj1g0032VBGtd8ctFl5M; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:15:50 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:15:42 -0800 References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so >> including it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. > > Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds > have dependencies on python. But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures causing the build to fail. >> b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the >> topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months >> or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib >> modules other than the schedulers and streaming. > > Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work > with 0.20 or beyond. Out of curiosity, what goes wrong? Clearly nothing major has changed in starting up a mapreduce cluster in a very long time. >> c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that >> we've ignored. > > Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. There are also some patches on core Hadoop that have been sitting for a long time, so I don't think that is a valid inference. I would love to hear some of the people who are using HOD speak up and give us their feedback. -- Owen From general-return-3035-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 05:51:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63172 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 05:51:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 05:51:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 25986 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:51:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25920 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:51:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25912 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 05:51:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:51:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:51:24 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGH00H0HPKNFB20@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:50:48 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-12_02:2011-02-11,2011-02-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110182 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:50:47 -0800 Message-id: References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. >> >> Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds have dependencies on python. > > But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures causing the build to fail. Ah, looks like we haven't been testing it via Hudson for a long time. Nige From general-return-3036-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 05:57:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64013 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 05:57:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 05:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 28857 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:57:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28670 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 05:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28662 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 05:57:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:57:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:57:39 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGH00C43PVHRT10@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:57:18 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-12_02:2011-02-11,2011-02-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110183 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:57:17 -0800 Message-id: <33A12FDB-820A-4CCC-9AB7-0521B41952B1@mac.com> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is great! So we'll leave mrunit in contrib until it can be moved to incubator. Nige On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > Just to add to the option of going to incubator, I'm fine with that as well. > Github was an easy thing to get started and I was under the impression we > needed some greater degree of committer diversity and, frankly, a bigger > project. If mrunit is a candidate, keeping this under the ASF umbrella is > more than fine with me. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > >> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I >> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in the >> best interest of its users. >> >> MRUnit is valuable to users of several different versions of Hadoop. But >> MRUnit has only ever been committed to version 0.21 and above -- even >> though >> in practice, the majority (dare I say--all) of its users are running on >> 0.20. The only place today to get a version of MRUnit compatible with 0.20 >> has been through a Cloudera release, which backported the entire MRUnit >> patchset. >> >> My thoughts on MRUnit in 0.20.100 resonate with Eric's. There will be >> further fixes to MRUnit and its lightweight codebase can be released far >> more rapidly than whenever the next 0.20.1xx release of Hadoop would occur. >> Given that MRUnit has already been in the repository since April 2009 (see >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5518) and has yet to see an >> Apache 0.20-based release, I do not think it is in the best interest of the >> library's userbase to couple MRUnit's release cycle to that of Hadoop >> itself. >> >> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not >> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client library >> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >> >> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can >> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this >> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I >> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and >> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >> >> Regards, >> - Aaron >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < >> chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >> >>> Awesome Patrick, we'd probably need one more active mentor. Any takers? >>> >>> After we get that, then we cook up a proposal on the Incubator wiki here >>> [1], and follow the process here [2] to get started... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Chris >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal >>> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html >>> >>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >>>> wrote: >>>>> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for >>> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >>>> >>>> I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >>>> also be happy to be a mentor. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the >>> most >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> important. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion >> in >>> the >>>>>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). >>> Independent of >>>>>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to >>> facilitate >>>>>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public >>> facing >>>>>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this >>> with the >>>>>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or >>> touch >>>>>> non-public APIs. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave >>> this >>>>>>>> within the ASF. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting >> system >>> for >>>>>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >>>>>> suggested it to me initially. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>>>>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support >>> read-write >>>>>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier >>> at >>>>>>> Apache than at github. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Owen >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Eric Sammer >>>>>> twitter: esammer >>>>>> data: www.cloudera.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>>>> Senior Computer Scientist >>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>> Senior Computer Scientist >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-3037-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 06:02:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64936 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 06:02:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 06:02:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 31892 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 06:02:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31664 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 06:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31656 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 06:02:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 06:02:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 06:01:58 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGH002PWQ29HS60@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:01:22 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-12_02:2011-02-11,2011-02-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102110183 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:01:21 -0800 Message-id: <5E398D0F-ABCC-497B-939A-9213A5B3C7C4@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. And only include them as source in releases. Nige On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Tom White wrote: > For contrib components that we elect not to remove, I suggest that we > remove them from the main build, so that failures in a contrib > component don't hinder the main build and release. This is what > ZooKeeper does, for example. > > Tom > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bernd Fondermann > wrote: >> -1. >> >> Move it away from TRUNK so it doesn't affect builds is a much better >> (and simpler) solution. If someone wants to revive it, he can within >> the bounds of Apache Hadoop and will become a part of the Hadoop >> community, which would be good. >> If you'd move it off-site, if the code ever gets new contributors, >> it's hard to integrate them (code and contributors) into Hadoop again. >> >> AFAIUI, apache-extras is for placing non-Apache code closer to the >> related Apache projects, not for moving our code away from our own >> premises. >> >> Bernd >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:42, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. >>> >>> These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. >>> >>> Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). >>> >>> Common Contrib: >>> failmon >>> hod >>> test >>> >>> >>> MapReduce Contrib: >>> capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? >>> data_join >>> dynamic-scheduler >>> eclipse-plugin >>> fairscheduler -- move to MR core? >>> gridmix >>> index >>> mrunit >>> mumak >>> raid >>> sqoop >>> streaming -- move to MR core? >>> vaidya >>> vertica >>> >>> >>> HDFS Contrib: >>> fuse-dfs >>> hdfsproxy >>> thriftfs >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>> >> From general-return-3038-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 08:18:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16870 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 08:18:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 08:18:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 88484 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 08:18:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87911 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 08:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87903 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 08:18:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:18:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.207] (HELO homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:18:31 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6411B1F0080 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:18:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=c00i7ge+x1A2r9KHYqLRyhD+KSMiKuUVGPMaI+ea3GdVMYBpL3LV ir7OWAIBeqRxhV28xnmnHsNR7B3NR4gqR0II7ULDsoP3Ngj5s49bj9ujrzxhlH0S /NK/xozlGxDwLsQNuA/RwE1xORW5TQ/HR4rZgOPQ7FhVBpJ3HF7P5fk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=OFuff24D+2Y/YM0WmMOfWpU+5x0=; b=SfSsQKSvxcAF12uxC9vDr3hANez9 9fdova3egxZkIQFv5iPj1r1OqCHGY6HmTveP3MLw+p2ApToKVxPczzShdQ1t6Pof e/a6I+Tw0ETtoytL4EtCL9R4Va6Ujg9+kABr0U6vN9YRoNJ5MvAkVi+UvJ+H+do5 xE62IRHpoZXAZz8= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32F111F007C for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:18:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:18:09 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:33, Ian Holsman wrote: >> They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them.. = any chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it? >=20 > Please keep in mind: The original author(s) would need to submit it - > not a proxy. No, anyone with permission of the copyright owner can submit it if it is a separately copyrightable work. If it is just a repair, then anyone can submit it, since repairs are not copyrightable. The original author should be noted in any credit given for the fix. ....Roy From general-return-3039-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 12 22:43:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29665 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2011 22:43:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2011 22:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 95549 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 22:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95466 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2011 22:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95458 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2011 22:43:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:43:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:43:19 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=WVM4D2tglxIwiDhTM2IKTGUwvpI5ZBpS1TOMBrA5siDEoAgIqROs7HDI AebjoMbriYFfpfehvgk72/8xfhxDaGw14l663E8PBQGXBUIRI4SZMaMlt /qv5wquI2i5sQKe; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297550596; x=1329086596; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=200.22=20Blockers|Date:=20Sat, =2012=20Feb=202011=2022:44:23=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20<03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8CF3-57 B8DF00E9B8@mac.com>|References:=20<57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD6 5-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com>=0D=0A=20<3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8- 6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com>=0D=0A=20<03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8C F3-57B8DF00E9B8@mac.com>; bh=hDGzG1WLjZ5FZ/Hob4qNtRhXNoOcFckVBz0RfGEWe/E=; b=eKC39P3uSBU2XyGj05FrH30iV8OceNYpmAL6GaSEmscJOsgOcYRSxBEi 8JjXbI/Fy7F0Fts8cMYO9iYGtptg0MWw2p2jl9YQLl3Ie67802y7B37ef xs9o9cz8sFKwPn3; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,463,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20116030" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:44:24 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Thread-Topic: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Thread-Index: AQHLyb5E13M7p8Xx00aNwoGFZtJq/pP9GAOAgAABJgCAAeXYAA== Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:44:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> <3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com> <03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8CF3-57B8DF00E9B8@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8CF3-57B8DF00E9B8@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> Tom has created a public Jira filter for 0.22 blockers (thanks Tom!): >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=3Dhide&r= equestId=3D12313687 >>> With the new version of Jira, this single query across projects & versi= ons is now possible. >>>=20 >>> Looks like 26 issues marked blocker. 9 of them unassigned -- would lov= e to get those assigned. I'll start reviewing these issues more closely ov= er the weekend. >>=20 >> Does this include the ones you unmarked as blockers for some mysterious= reason? >=20 > To which issues are you referring exactly? >=20 I'm thinking specifically of the one that prevents datanodes from being pr= operly decommissioned. But you've changed so many it is hard to say what t= he full list is.= From general-return-3040-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 13 00:57:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84320 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2011 00:57:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2011 00:57:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 43897 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2011 00:57:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43820 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2011 00:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43811 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2011 00:57:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:57:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:57:22 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_cbRb3sXTUT84iHOEy9NlCQ)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGJ003VF6M17Z00@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:56:26 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-13_01:2011-02-11,2011-02-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102120085 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.22 Blockers Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:56:25 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <57A4D9DB-2CD2-4838-AD65-7DEBA1F3F0EA@mac.com> <3D9EA200-342B-4B1F-A2E8-6FC159BFDE38@linkedin.com> <03B93C0F-FDB4-4704-8CF3-57B8DF00E9B8@mac.com> Message-id: <768EC263-4F4F-4377-8561-2769C07318C3@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_cbRb3sXTUT84iHOEy9NlCQ) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT On Feb 12, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Tom has created a public Jira filter for 0.22 blockers (thanks Tom!): >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12313687 >>>> With the new version of Jira, this single query across projects & versions is now possible. >>>> >>>> Looks like 26 issues marked blocker. 9 of them unassigned -- would love to get those assigned. I'll start reviewing these issues more closely over the weekend. >>> >>> Does this include the ones you unmarked as blockers for some mysterious reason? >> >> To which issues are you referring exactly? >> > > > I'm thinking specifically of the one that prevents datanodes from being properly decommissioned. But you've changed so many it is hard to say what the full list is. Something from here perhaps? https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=t39bSGEkCmAqKkXJwyHVFJw&hl=en#gid=3 These were the original Hadoop 0.22 Jira's that weren't blockers so I unassigned them, as per release SOP. I want to make sure what you're referring to was inadvertent. Please provide issue numbers and then I can respond. Nige --Boundary_(ID_cbRb3sXTUT84iHOEy9NlCQ)-- From general-return-3041-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 14 06:16:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95777 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2011 06:16:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 06:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 24015 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 06:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23654 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 06:16:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23641 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2011 06:16:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:16:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:16:17 +0000 Received: from [10.66.72.163] (sightbusy-lx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.72.163]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1E6FjXv032594; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:15:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297664146; bh=87jj+TVOEXmuqCxuxUzWgZ9org91LfYuptYNavggZAg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mn1digmGbnLU5TUTFA1ONARCJkZmeQWJxs+DizkEiVdC50pNMTnaZ8zMDpToWrbPs OoI6uG4SQWSIIZ0/RwDJ6kUV2kOjyV2inTjY9pWZvZ9rbEpOe2R4F6uA++EnTstqUG rdTYoF5v8FBi9iNrfg4rI7RjZxcmVkGzZGiuOaB0= Message-ID: <4D58C890.5030601@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:45:44 +0530 From: Vinod KV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "Owen O'Malley" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hemanth Yamijala and myself were the main contributors to HOD. Answers to few of the questions: - IIRC, Hod needed python 2.5 (or some such latest) which was not available on Hudson. The tests gracefully run only when that version is available. We always used to run these tests on dev boxes before pushing patches. May be the versions upgraded after that, but I am not sure. - HOD wasn't tested extensively with Hadoop 0.20 and beyond. But I could successfully run HOD clusters with Hadoop 20. Thing that could affect the run are the configuration properties, environment variables and the scripts which at that time were backwards compatible. If some properties were removed in 21/22 breaking compatibility with pre 20 versions (very much possible), that will warrant fixing HOD. Otherwise, things should work as they are. Sure would like to know any interest with the users. Thanks, +Vinod On Saturday 12 February 2011 10:45 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so >>> including it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. >> Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds >> have dependencies on python. > But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures > causing the build to fail. > >>> b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the >>> topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months >>> or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib >>> modules other than the schedulers and streaming. >> Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work >> with 0.20 or beyond. > Out of curiosity, what goes wrong? Clearly nothing major has changed > in starting up a mapreduce cluster in a very long time. > >>> c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that >>> we've ignored. >> Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. > There are also some patches on core Hadoop that have been sitting for > a long time, so I don't think that is a valid inference. > > I would love to hear some of the people who are using HOD speak up and > give us their feedback. > > -- Owen > From general-return-3042-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 14 21:34:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14880 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2011 21:34:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 21:34:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12759 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 21:34:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12666 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 21:34:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12658 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2011 21:34:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:34:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:34:29 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1ELY3f4075720 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297719244; bh=GPJW3ZIWh6bWaykOtnbhyzSFd7lDBvSnz7AYWcvy98s=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=VkBJcVSsKSfGOfMO9fKH12IdSfa32PxrljNiMBqT/SFYDDSCNp0S4PoIArA3BM55e y34inBA26Z6N7frmiSGiphC7Jp78Mh2WLCqnhqp4MhJCrTgSUztduSO7dr+ldR0G3O l9iGQW6uuOUKwjDCg7r7QEyhxo/yYEYgPIuMh9r8= Message-Id: <75192454-0158-4C84-9F79-337A16AA913E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yahoo focusing on Apache Hadoop, discontinuing "The Yahoo Distribution of Hadoop" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:34:03 -0800 References: <55BA39F5-5017-42B1-BE25-A643CCEADC75@yahoo-inc.com> <354259E0-9D22-47B5-B247-4187182B60DF@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > >> Unfortunately, we now have to sort out how to contribute several >> person-years worth of work to Apache to let us unwind the Yahoo! git >> repositories. We currently run two lines of Hadoop development, our >> sustaining program (hadoop-0.20-sustaining) and hadoop-future. > > I also plan to start pushing the hadoop-future work into a branch > called yahoo-merge(?) as individual commits from our internal git > repository. The goal of creating the branch is to enable faster review > and discussion. These patches will be individually run through the > jira, review, and commit process to be added to trunk. As the final installment in this process, I've started a discussion on us contributing a re-factor of Map-Reduce in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-279 . We have a prototype we'd like to commit to a branch soon, where we look forward to feedback. From there on, we would love to collaborate to get it committed to trunk. thanks, Arun From general-return-3043-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 11:14:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74677 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 11:14:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 11:14:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 15453 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 11:14:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15151 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 11:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15140 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 11:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:14:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22377B7D3E for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:13:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id H6VPR+yJ9yAL for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:13:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AE2B7CB2 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:13:46 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1298373215.03588@1A6sSnFDGNi0/WjZNFnu7w Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p1FBDXcF008960 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:13:33 GMT Message-ID: <4D5A5FDD.70600@apache.org> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:13:33 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p1FBDXcF008960 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/02/11 22:26, Eric Sammer wrote: > Just to add to the option of going to incubator, I'm fine with that as well. > Github was an easy thing to get started and I was under the impression we > needed some greater degree of committer diversity and, frankly, a bigger > project. If mrunit is a candidate, keeping this under the ASF umbrella is > more than fine with me. > There is a git repository coming up at Apache, with global read and LDAP-authenticated write: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3165 I know a lot of the in house Hadoop teams use Git for SCM, so I think having the big Hadoop projects work on Git too makes sense -it would certainly help Owen and team get their changes over if their branches could be merged. Starting off with a small but active Hadoop family project would be the way to start this, and MRUnit does appeal as a first step -active development -fast and decoupled release cycle -off the critical path I'll volunteer to go down as a committer with the usual caveat that I am over-committed and unless I have a direct personal need to touch the code I'll be effectively offline. Tom White can vouch for that, given my engagement in Whirr. Here then are my votes +1 to move Mrunit into incubator +1 to experiment with mrunit being live in Apache's Git repository. -steve From general-return-3044-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 18:37:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27055 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 18:37:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 18:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 29311 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:37:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29056 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29048 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:37:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:37:24 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [172.29.12.221] ([173.164.176.117]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGO009QI90SMJ40@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:36:29 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-15_06:2011-02-15,2011-02-15,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102150107 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:36:28 -0800 Message-id: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I'm happy to help mentor as well. Cheers, Nige On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > also be happy to be a mentor. > > Patrick > >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>> >>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the most >>>>> >>>> >>>> important. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in the >>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >>> >>> >>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independent of >>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilitate >>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public facing >>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this with the >>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or touch >>> non-public APIs. >>> >>> >>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave this >>>>> within the ASF. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system for >>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >>> >>> >>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >>> suggested it to me initially. >>> >>> >>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>>> >>> >>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-write >>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier at >>>> Apache than at github. >>>> >>> >>>> -- Owen >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Sammer >>> twitter: esammer >>> data: www.cloudera.com >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> From general-return-3045-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 18:44:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29324 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 18:44:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 18:44:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 42868 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:44:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42542 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 18:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42533 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 18:44:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:44:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:44:28 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so337375vws.35 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:44:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.186.195 with SMTP id ct3mr1346472vcb.57.1297795446767; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:44:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:44:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a896988589049c568ce7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba53a896988589049c568ce7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm happy to help mentor as well. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > > wrote: > >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for > MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > > > > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > > also be happy to be a mentor. > > > > Patrick > > > >> > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >>>> > >>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the > most > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> important. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in > the > >>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). > Independent of > >>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to > facilitate > >>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public > facing > >>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this > with the > >>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or > touch > >>> non-public APIs. > >>> > >>> > >>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave > this > >>>>> within the ASF. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting system > for > >>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. > >>> > >>> > >>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone > >>> suggested it to me initially. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily > >>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). > >>>> > >>> > >>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support > read-write > >>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier > at > >>>> Apache than at github. > >>>> > >>> > >>>> -- Owen > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Eric Sammer > >>> twitter: esammer > >>> data: www.cloudera.com > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba53a896988589049c568ce7-- From general-return-3046-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 19:02:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36695 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 19:02:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 19:02:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 68869 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 19:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68475 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 19:02:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68083 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 19:02:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:02:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:02:18 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so3354241wwi.5 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.2.73 with SMTP id o51mr1144870wes.66.1297796516786; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:01:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:01:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:01:36 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hvldm39sfNsXpZ1A5gtr2Zg-LWs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am up to help as a committer on this project. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:36, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'm happy to help mentor as well. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> wrote: >>> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for M= RUnit, I would be happy to help. >> >> I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >> also be happy to be a mentor. >> >> Patrick >> >>> >>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Owen O'Malley w= rote: >>>> >>>>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> - allow mrunit to have its own release cycle. This is, I think, the m= ost >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> important. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you submit your work to Apache we can evaluate it for inclusion in= the >>>>> 0.20.100 branch to get your changes released in a timely manner. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm thinking in general (beyond the next immediate release). Independe= nt of >>>> where mrunit goes, I think it should leave the contrib tree to facilit= ate >>>> light weight releases (the dependency on Hadoop proper is a public fac= ing >>>> API - a pure client). I think most projects could benefit from this wi= th the >>>> exception of things that are tightly coupled to Hadoop releases or tou= ch >>>> non-public APIs. >>>> >>>> >>>>> I would actually prefer to move it to Extras or Incubator and leave t= his >>>>>> within the ASF. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Extras is **NOT** inside of the ASF. Extras is a source hosting syste= m for >>>>> non-Apache projects that are related to Apache projects. >>>> >>>> >>>> Got it. Thanks for correcting me. I only mentioned it because someone >>>> suggested it to me initially. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Right now, I picked github because of the ability to easily >>>>> collaborate with others (and to use git). >>>>> >>>> >>>> I agree that it is unfortunate that Apache doesn't yet support read-wr= ite >>>>> git access. However, you'll find that building a community is easier = at >>>>> Apache than at github. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -- Owen >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Eric Sammer >>>> twitter: esammer >>>> data: www.cloudera.com >>> >>> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>> Senior Computer Scientist >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>> WWW: =A0 http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> > > From general-return-3047-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 21:13:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15455 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 21:13:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 21:13:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 91322 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 21:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91240 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 21:13:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91232 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 21:12:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:12:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:12:53 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1FLBsYa001896 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297804314; bh=ukYQhpad+b0QfsNItplIv+36Rm0t+yjmBuYEh8kxn5A=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=bywJkJIXhs+Jgvt8KrAvL5pmQ0TNJQIU9GNaINsGv+Jnf4M8ITNKW/4i5v95YzbpB L8gOB0UIeM+kzufkvfT+xexbnQoUEcWhgBwiuKeA5z537k2iLoq21Q7jsKEfz1kY+3 2EiW/NLHSSNlHT+Owk7Z+7Ug8JluMOymnzOQWhMc= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <33A12FDB-820A-4CCC-9AB7-0521B41952B1@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:11:53 -0800 References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> <33A12FDB-820A-4CCC-9AB7-0521B41952B1@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:57 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > This is great! So we'll leave mrunit in contrib until it can be > moved to incubator. > +1 From general-return-3048-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 21:59:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29218 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 21:59:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 21:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 45375 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 21:59:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45046 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 21:59:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45032 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 21:59:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:59:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:59:09 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so667307wye.35 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:58:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.132 with SMTP id x4mr1327956wex.81.1297807127585; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:58:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:58:27 -0800 (PST) From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:58:27 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ukTjFoxD4LQBlTgdfbzmbvjZdyQ Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I believe it has to be elaborated further. A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing project which will take care about development and support of common (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to share your thoughts :) -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> > wrote: >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >> > >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >> > also be happy to be a mentor. >> > >> > Patrick From general-return-3049-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 22:14:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42547 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 22:14:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 22:14:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 62871 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62763 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62754 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.109] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:14:35 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1FMEC66009049 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:14:12 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.72]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:14:11 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:14:03 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] Thread-Topic: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] Thread-Index: AcvNXaxJTZGJm0h5QtCPJlVpzb4q0w== Message-ID: <2BF0E28E-32C9-4EA1-844D-035588928B53@jpl.nasa.gov> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds good to me, Cos. I'm fine to help/mentor with either one that ends u= p standing when the dust clears :) Cheers, Chris On Feb 15, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like > to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that > discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I > believe it has to be elaborated further. >=20 > A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related > component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are > MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all > focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or > on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. > However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of > projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >=20 > How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing > project which will take care about development and support of common > (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to > share your thoughts :) > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: >> I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping >> people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! >>=20 >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm happy to help mentor as well. >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >>>> wrote: >>>>> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for >>> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >>>>=20 >>>> I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >>>> also be happy to be a mentor. >>>>=20 >>>> Patrick ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3050-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 22:15:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42911 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 22:15:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 22:15:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 64404 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 22:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64344 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 22:15:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64336 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 22:15:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:15:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:15:35 +0000 Received: by vxb37 with SMTP id 37so493957vxb.35 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:15:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.181.138 with SMTP id by10mr1642299vcb.92.1297808113497; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:15:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.80 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:15:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:15:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fc3b697ddd5049c597fb0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba4fc3b697ddd5049c597fb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think this is a good idea. The only thing I think is that it may make sense to split such an effort into two components: one for the testing of Hadoop and the projects themselves and one to test end user applications and libraries. Performance testing tools like YCSB are probably more in the former camp where mrunit is the latter, as a for instance. I think it's important to have separate artifacts to minimize uber-jar issues (or contrib-like situations where release cycles are coupled). On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like > to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that > discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I > believe it has to be elaborated further. > > A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related > component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are > MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all > focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or > on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. > However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of > projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. > > How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing > project which will take care about development and support of common > (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to > share your thoughts :) > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: > > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping > > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > >> > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > >> > wrote: > >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for > >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > >> > > >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > >> > also be happy to be a mentor. > >> > > >> > Patrick > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --90e6ba4fc3b697ddd5049c597fb0-- From general-return-3051-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 15 23:55:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75651 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 23:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 23:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1936 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 23:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1874 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 23:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1805 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 23:55:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:55:17 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so786131wwd.29 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:54:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.132 with SMTP id x4mr1408374wex.81.1297814095447; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:54:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:54:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:54:35 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fnnnr2F39cp4crvIsC4McnJcowc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 14:15, Eric Sammer wrote: > I think this is a good idea. The only thing I think is that it may make > sense to split such an effort into two components: one for the testing of > Hadoop and the projects themselves and one to test end user applications = and I expect to see even greater number of component, to be honest. E.g. a harness to run stacks testing (which as has been discussed with HBase folks might utilize YCSB artifacts). Which doesn't invalidate the purpose of central Hadoop testing project or whatever we might call it. > libraries. Performance testing tools like YCSB are probably more in the > former camp where mrunit is the latter, as a for instance. I think it's > important to have separate artifacts to minimize uber-jar issues (or > contrib-like situations where release cycles are coupled). Having separate artifacts/release cycles would be pretty important for another reason too: test artifacts might undergo significant changes between releases of a product. Thus requiring using different versions of such validating artifacts for differently composed Hadoop stacks. Uber-jar are proven to be inflexible and pain to deal with. Cos > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrot= e: > >> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I >> believe it has to be elaborated further. >> >> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are >> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or >> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. >> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >> >> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >> project which will take care about development and support of common >> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to >> share your thoughts :) >> -- >> =A0Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: >> > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll pin= g >> > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> > >> >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nige >> >> >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville = for >> >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >> >> > >> >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I woul= d >> >> > also be happy to be a mentor. >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > From general-return-3052-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 16 11:38:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75816 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 11:38:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 11:38:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 35230 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 11:38:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34812 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 11:38:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34801 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 11:38:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:38:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E190B7DD1 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:32 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VPBUhMdLSxR3 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A581B7DC1 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:20 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1298461028.36992@5x2sSncegTd3NQ21xZC26g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p1GBb7vO013393 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:07 GMT Message-ID: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:37:08 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p1GBb7vO013393 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like > to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that > discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I > believe it has to be elaborated further. > > A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related > component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are > MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all > focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or > on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. > However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of > projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. > > How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing > project which will take care about development and support of common > (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to > share your thoughts :) > -- I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have their own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables to be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack once your latest patch is applied". That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do -right now terasort is the main stress test. From general-return-3053-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 16 18:23:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26431 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 18:23:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 18:23:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 31664 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 18:23:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31307 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 18:23:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31299 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 18:23:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:23:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jrottinghuis@ebay.com) Received: from [216.33.244.7] (HELO rhv-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com) (216.33.244.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:23:04 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Date: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=StNSjyu6ELnBkcjrMLMQd38rERqj2t4w6/Oh7FJkMJCJd1QS91Fkx54K Hb1D+VbjWwA6EQtoKPxaaHD4i1nic1iYJXv6uMu7xmFr1vYnvGphNNVr8 n70Ldn3MwEwAnFP; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=jrottinghuis@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1297880584; x=1329416584; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; z=From:=20"Rottinghuis,=20Joep"=20 |To:=20"general@hadoop.apache.org"=20|Date:=20Wed,=2016=20Feb=202011=2010:19:21=20-0800 |Subject:=20RE:=20Hadoop=20testing=20project=20[Was:=20[V OTE]=20Abandon=20mrunit=20MapReduce=0D=0A=20contrib] |Message-ID:=20|References:=20 |In-Reply-To:=20|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quot ed-printable|MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=mZkHYMGK7qbymBEooUn22UIP4L0uo/poC5xHSEm7kJQ=; b=3XsCcNsuuQuL2X5a4zWRbtBcDHMxnJ+CXhY9ViJjDrb1Q43qdnQ31+8E EIWYFrH0hBfAgmTjbhnKk9QFHZ9cRjfIjVgHpw183n0hRRPXoHklVoSTP JBH37Ei0Z2qLwiO; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,480,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="8310883" Received: from rhv-vtenf-001.corp.ebay.com (HELO RHV-MEXHT-001.corp.ebay.com) ([10.112.113.52]) by rhv-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2011 10:22:40 -0800 Received: from RHV-MEXMS-002.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.17.114]) by RHV-MEXHT-001.corp.ebay.com ([10.245.24.100]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:22:39 -0800 From: "Rottinghuis, Joep" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:19:21 -0800 Subject: RE: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] Thread-Topic: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] Thread-Index: AcvNW5f4MNkIM+lgQ+aUgeRxC0GldQAqnCE5 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== x-ems-stamp: qp9wncopcho0EvOFWQ9ePw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter: Scanned X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Having a coherent approach for system level testing increases confidence in= the various Hadoop releases and and will reduce the effort to take any (se= t of ) changes from development into production. The more automated and formalized system testing, the better! Thanks, Joep ________________________________________ From: cos@boudnik.org [cos@boudnik.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Boudnik [co= s@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 1:58 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contr= ib] While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I believe it has to be elaborated further. A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing project which will take care about development and support of common (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to share your thoughts :) -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> > wrote: >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >> > >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would >> > also be happy to be a mentor. >> > >> > Patrick= From general-return-3054-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 16 19:50:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89171 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 19:50:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 19:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 36721 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 19:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36494 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 19:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36486 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 19:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:50:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.212] (HELO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:50:36 +0000 Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8jjK1g0021HpZEsAEjqEKZ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:50:14 +0000 Received: from fs ([24.4.185.157]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8jqD1g0073QAh8g8ajqEQc; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:50:14 +0000 Received: from mail.boudnik.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fs (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p1GJoDrG029705 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:50:13 -0800 Received: (from cos@localhost) by mail.boudnik.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p1GJoCq1029704 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:50:12 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.boudnik.org: cos set sender to cos@apache.org using -f Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:50:12 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project Message-ID: <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> References: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Steve. If the project under discussion will provide a common harness where such a test artifact (think of a Maven artifact for example) will click and will be executed automatically with all needed tools and dependencies resolved for you - would it be appealing for end-users' cause? As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) changes from development into production." Take it one step further: when your cluster is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, etc.); is it desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing work-load you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: wget http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v12.4.pom \ && mvn verify and check the results later on? These gonna be the same tools that dev. use for their tasks although worksets will be different. So what? Cos On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:37AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I >> believe it has to be elaborated further. >> >> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are >> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or >> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. >> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >> >> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >> project which will take care about development and support of common >> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to >> share your thoughts :) >> -- > > I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have their > own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables to > be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, > rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack once > your latest patch is applied". > > That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and > cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do > -right now terasort is the main stress test. From general-return-3055-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 04:26:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24548 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 04:26:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 04:26:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 85839 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 04:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85387 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 04:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85374 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 04:26:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:26:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:26:31 +0000 Received: from traveling-laptop-66-59.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (traveling-laptop-66-59.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.66.59]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1H4PpFM096613 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297916753; bh=KFZEXKduCdhbxyzZtj1W7GmU4uJBWmdW2bCU8hUbE6k=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=PbGMnItxE6op8zndCS7sRn/bTERUrfz4rbxoJvx6TUs5OlMBem/vzsEm3PdTLwkyN f5000cvsq1L5Q0xq6fP552jS4qYPZBScosMuMK32+uLJBfsLBtKCtlnATZc97lHZ9c 4QpT/aogpsMCWk1KiqkI3R2AvT2gcuTDuc18vvD0= Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:55:52 +0530 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 23:19, Owen O'Malley > wrote: >> >> On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched >>> (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches >>> ) >>> I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of >>> common, >>> mapreduce, and hdfs. >> >> The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to >> abandon >> code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate >> action some >> group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on >> the code >> from Hadoop. >> >> Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to >> abandon. >> That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves >> occasionally. >> >> After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: >> >> failmon >> fault injection > > This is the best way to kill a project as tightly coupled with the > core code as fault injection. > > So, if you really want to kill it - then move it. Nigel/Owen did not say "kill it". Folks were simply listing potential projects to move out. If you feel that it should stay in then simply say so and give the reasons -- looks like your reason is "tight coupling". sanjay > >> fuse-dfs >> hod >> kfs >> >> Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There >> are at >> least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a >> lot of >> confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to >> figure out >> which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the >> version of >> Hadoop they installed. >> >> -- Owen >> >> From general-return-3056-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 04:32:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25309 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 04:32:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 04:32:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 88861 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 04:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88551 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 04:32:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88543 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 04:32:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:27 +0000 Received: from traveling-laptop-66-59.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (traveling-laptop-66-59.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.66.59]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1H4VgDG098126 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:31:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1297917104; bh=/k4/66507HjDWBbZYPkXppodVvP4B17iDESvPImQEZM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=fXl9qaFJmsi7cGAGwIJMVM4YgX0sryFvawkkXa0cRElnwJfguPM5kHgR+tzKnI4zH SGOVfClypZWCkiZR4gbYqKxZmVodtC16zhza952w/ws+AizFUSSEvksrZl6le7hrds WWrwNS9Hdza9tC7gmrgv9zneyTRK5GaD64g/y0jU= Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:01:43 +0530 References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> >> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib >>>> component. It's >>>> last meaningful contribution was August 2010: >>>> >>> >>> -1 we still use and are maintaining this. >> >> >> Who's the 'we'? Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was >> failing a unit test for 7 months. This is exactly the reason we >> should thoughtfully consider whether it has a future within Hadoop. >> >> Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy? > > They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them Yes, we have some updates that we haven;t got around to pushing around > .. any chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it? I will check into this and get back. We are also working to incorporate some of the features of the proxy into hdfs proper -- if that work completes and is accepted by the community then hdfs proxy may become less useful. Hence, for now, my vote is -1 for removing hdfs proxy. sanjay sanjay > > Regards > Ian > >> >> Nige >> > From general-return-3057-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 05:30:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41991 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 05:30:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 05:30:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14691 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 05:30:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14237 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 05:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14227 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 05:30:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:30:44 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2135151wwd.29 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:30:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.79.80 with SMTP id h58mr1287129wee.111.1297920622420; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:30:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:30:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:30:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xp-srOeTU5ZNvB4kFqzZfqvRMTA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes, Sanjay. The reason is 'tight coupling'. In fact this was I who was opposing it - not Nigel. I guess you misread the thread ;) On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:25, Sanjay Radia wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 23:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched >>>> >>>> (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) >>>> I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of >>>> common, >>>> mapreduce, and hdfs. >>> >>> The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to abandon >>> code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate action >>> some >>> group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on the >>> code >>> from Hadoop. >>> >>> Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to >>> abandon. >>> That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves >>> occasionally. >>> >>> After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: >>> >>> failmon >>> fault injection >> >> This is the best way to kill a project as tightly coupled with the >> core code as fault injection. >> >> So, if you really want to kill it - then move it. > > > Nigel/Owen did not say "kill it". Folks were simply listing potential > projects to move out. > If you feel that it should stay in then simply say so and give the reasons > -- looks like your reason is "tight coupling". > > > sanjay > >> >>> fuse-dfs >>> hod >>> kfs >>> >>> Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at >>> least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of >>> confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure >>> out >>> which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of >>> Hadoop they installed. >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >>> > > From general-return-3058-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 12:44:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47889 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 12:44:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 12:44:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 29353 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 12:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28878 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 12:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28866 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 12:44:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:44:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:44:08 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2428773iyb.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:43:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+LAqN2j3zeqH3S8YLhUA6B20ENw2g/1umDnkO8zRmsc=; b=PNwaL+ZqJiSWkWWKIGO4y6EeFBYvJpkoRdxrVj+1xNkBtZ2Ua/u4ydLU5WFphfQSYU iV2So4X7TcdTpS8fhWM7BZPoVdg5QBe/4DS9GuaMewRSaZMFzyZTl5vg4a9WE4BiKnFA +G4k/XYABGh2jZLUT9232ZVpJatQaE3AGEAXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iu6TBhMXoUAaMMAUU/durKUt+eHEcernHcxLbHWKUHw7XR903Xzp1NsrtVi9a9IASq JcE1mN90aQZ7KrHWl3qHrtJFUdyK6HhV1dLY3iuZiJh24o7+BXUNcGxmSXCFVqbeoePV LvzSZA1jTlJ24nu2PW+yP/C6Hdve9ZjbgPQDY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.239.200 with SMTP id kx8mr2562758icb.416.1297946627951; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:43:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:43:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 09:18, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:33, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them.. a= ny chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it? >> >> Please keep in mind: The original author(s) would need to submit it - >> not a proxy. > > No, anyone with permission of the copyright owner can submit it > if it is a separately copyrightable work. =A0If it is just a repair, > then anyone can submit it, since repairs are not copyrightable. > The original author should be noted in any credit given for the > fix. We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. This is open source development upside down. It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every line of code changed. For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearance pro= cess. Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained here. Discussions are seldom consense-driven. Release branches stagnate. Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate doors. Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ ) instead of on the proper mailing list. Hurdles for committing are way too high. On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is an improvement. I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, well, so be it. Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized cluster instead. Bernd From general-return-3059-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 13:32:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66692 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 13:32:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 13:32:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 89228 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:32:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88783 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88759 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 13:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:32:04 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2475526iyb.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:31:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tPS4ivaPGMavR47NJPDtVjjfu2Tv1We1s0u24NSChgQ=; b=CQwYQJfGhr91QtjdGI3fh/oL3rKpioM57ozztye6/MgNVcqWxJzAFdfdK5rQO5k/ac MtXp1SwGQXQJrFZnnZ3Weapjf35NA/d+Y/2UaNCZKWs6VnmL/qCVDx+cnjxPZeBYH7Z9 BabkazI5IjePDVeMJatvpNG319465O7quH30M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=utgDPV1sbGDQP1r04y4+viflGPav/Di4mVAnslobkTfVZaraH2ZEUCssGAY9Lt/4l1 ORb5nWhAPScud6ZolzYDrzXLblVWesQ5MQKT5Q1DBG403ck5e5cWQAdLMWpMozHP4NVX VdYhny7hvv+XB2O83/XX6vNHke9Atm97Qrymk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.213.66 with SMTP id gv2mr2708658icb.81.1297949503671; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:31:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:31:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball wrote: > The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I > believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in the > best interest of its users. Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit from the same source where I get my MR from. Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. > Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not > require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client library > that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. +1. > My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can > derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this > role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I > believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and > continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR community? Bernd From general-return-3060-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 13:46:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70331 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 13:46:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 13:46:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12799 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12774 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 13:46:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:46:19 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1100896vws.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:45:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=uit4PO8G3r1v2l3+96EBICsGEPhTGx1EkBE13+g/rsM=; b=i++UGGyqG0IAv/S1t1qjjDFOfY1x/XKw9lXZjapaS4q/PDoVV28dTXTP78I+P4VrE+ XURkPUUuTcCeIPfJUHdE/A83++bbjJeW9jslwZWWStYe18P+xA/R4M2r765C91jgSWim lJWGzlYxxSr0Vdr2eCauoZIDdhAScKsuWwgCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=eIYnTd4WKeW6MfVpYAUKqTMvw8gSpHwMlCnE+dL88uMWz8yr06SzTCOOyzppfvOBdn rgMviAfRjC0KVDb3GQbaHpz9F69VRZBhvA4pgprOuKUOEi/IJuNZ5TKhAS5t/5gWFPCG eH2pIm9IcoXMgPGT7eU+rTNHWasBs9mLe0zcQ= Received: by 10.52.159.161 with SMTP id xd1mr149321vdb.23.1297950357868; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.79] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm418868vch.43.2011.02.17.05.45.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:45:56 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:45:55 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19DCD585-D5DC-43B9-8CA5-DAE6F949F5DC@Holsman.NET> References: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm not sure it makes sense to all the testing packages under a = different umbrella that covers the code they test. While there might be commonalities building a test harness, I would = think that each testing tool would need to have deep knowledge of the = tool's internals that it is testing. as such it would need someone with = the experience to code it. I don't see what advantage combining PigUnit & say 'MRUnit' would be for = example.=20 --I On Feb 16, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Steve. >=20 > If the project under discussion will provide a common harness where = such a test > artifact (think of a Maven artifact for example) will click and will = be > executed automatically with all needed tools and dependencies resolved = for you > - would it be appealing for end-users' cause? >=20 > As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) = changes > from development into production." Take it one step further: when your = cluster > is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, = etc.); is it > desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing = work-load > you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: >=20 > wget = http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v12.4.pom \ > && mvn verify >=20 > and check the results later on? >=20 > These gonna be the same tools that dev. use for their tasks although = worksets > will be different. So what? >=20 > Cos >=20 > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:37AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >> On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >>> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >>> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and = I >>> believe it has to be elaborated further. >>>=20 >>> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >>> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those = are >>> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >>> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop = or >>> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for = Hadoop. >>> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >>> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >>>=20 >>> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >>> project which will take care about development and support of common >>> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free = to >>> share your thoughts :) >>> -- >>=20 >> I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have = their =20 >> own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables = to =20 >> be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, =20= >> rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack = once =20 >> your latest patch is applied". >>=20 >> That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and =20= >> cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do =20= >> -right now terasort is the main stress test. From general-return-3061-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 13:59:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73714 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 13:59:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 13:59:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 40212 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39822 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 13:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39813 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 13:59:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:59:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:59:19 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so2507636qwe.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:58:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=wlbDA1hxSXRnC7F3hHEPYex7HQgcZ90D1B89toYy8Is=; b=XRkhk7FsyTfPRNXYQ0Si9PifqhTlcb9UvGuEoakqEXmqk3gUkKMU2CcvhqpBYLaNRN YP8T5v6aOOCWt8g+qaz+aFuRzCw0S/XNZseenu3SdDxYlJhybX21L0r0Bo4Dmq/5jJcF bLNewCvPf1vXAM6mp0TOt4hhS1oVDUDLW+kio= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Vh1FHllcfMlCwBMQ4haL+7kD3CEfH1VZwk4JCymhbkgVpUut9oFe8CTxkjvLqpnRpb xxOEM+gn2IAD3S+Cd/C+V3eUe1zwDO8tdzrvJF1LNrG0O8C0vPqBTAvLCi+KHvlxEcKE Vrfix/GORk598uUXCanhqxI1aHvdEH6b3Qs8I= Received: by 10.224.80.143 with SMTP id t15mr2599118qak.41.1297951137949; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.79] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm705378qcu.7.2011.02.17.05.58.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:58:57 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:58:56 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Bernd. On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >=20 > We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache > Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. > Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in > (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. This has been the situation in the past, but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main = code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 = branch, and their recent commits to trunk.=20 Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and = sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing = your concerns. They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see = the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in = MAPREDUCE-279. I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand = there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. > This is open source development upside down. > It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code > and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every > line of code changed. > For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP = clearance process. > Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open > and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >=20 > To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. > Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained = here. > Discussions are seldom consense-driven. > Release branches stagnate. True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being = extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least = 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for = someone to verify. > Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. > Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. > Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate = doors. > Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( > = http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ > ) instead of on the proper mailing list. > Hurdles for committing are way too high. > On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is > an improvement. >=20 > I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from > corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer > commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. > If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, > well, so be it. > Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high > end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then > the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized > cluster instead. Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there = who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate = to see hadoop become something that only runs well on 10-nodes.. as I = don't think that will help anyone either. >=20 > Bernd From general-return-3062-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 15:23:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3703 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 15:23:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 15:23:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 94200 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 15:23:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93780 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 15:23:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93766 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 15:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:23:24 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so1143289gxk.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:23:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gHqP0CGrzxWnbxeXBNyrGBh0i2FORQ7MnNIOXl2hh5g=; b=ThGRDonz1xvrFpdxXp0dNxhI19CUv5H5u2XK7GlwVH/uSwnY9q7Em+pvSf2osn2+vb TIo8fsTt72yrlIS9ZsW/7dlsXMu6iSqz8FgpW9mE/fME9GlSo/gmBTr9mUcJxvu87p/N 4nIBHSgkYUqiKVKl7Kuku5LvS/Jyt2sOnbMqw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QGM3H3YuMzZI9L3nSm9+U+MvSdvHa/kUMxQlTTqactPJ7xsxxsHKJCbx1cKnDf+JJU GXPqZqBObXmvidDBheHTWb/pzsGqArv5RRQExvtyaPm3uSFeRM8VQM6WyWUdoAPvH5iN mA89Yb4xpRkNmmK0YMnCe8RIIC6PT7AJwgysQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.223.65 with SMTP id ij1mr2938715icb.349.1297956182976; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hi Bernd. > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> >> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. > > This has been the situation in the past, > but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. > > Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 branch, > and their recent commits to trunk. > Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your concerns. > > They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in MAPREDUCE-279. > > I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into the right direction. >> This is open source development upside down. >> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >> line of code changed. >> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearance process. >> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >> >> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained here. >> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >> Release branches stagnate. > > True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. > It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for someone to verify. It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this size. >> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate doors. >> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( >> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ >> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is >> an improvement. >> >> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, >> well, so be it. > >> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized >> cluster instead. > > > Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to see hadoop become something that only runs well on > 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on the low-end and medium sized users. I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big companies either. Focus on all the users. Bernd From general-return-3063-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 17:14:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77765 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 17:14:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 17:14:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 51983 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:14:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51476 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:14:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51465 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 17:14:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:14:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:14:12 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=hrz+57osGwpaedvHsYt0BsRShds8hyRR5nOMyT4ye17QrnvXZW6p5Jjp TwlUR83PC79QDSp3pzxUGGzquKtwsg79puR/8mduf2xpa2gLfmubw1LM5 11LUCrSE9LLgrFd; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297962847; x=1329498847; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=20testing=20project|Date:=20Thu, =2017=20Feb=202011=2017:15:23=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<4224 A6E6-D5A1-46FD-890D-4AAF4C14AEF7@linkedin.com>|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<9460C078A739844A9E6F8BA3DA5A1FFB @linkedin.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<20110216195012.GA29594@lin spire.com>|References:=20=0D=0A=20<4D5BB6E4.804040 3@apache.org>=20<20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com>; bh=Cgm1jGrsgyAgS7bvo0ogCRtL2dK000ErnCMacC9bN/0=; b=HpWdDdegNwYttfEUM75S+Cwk5MIWJPwq3Mc6K5reHYC4NArvJbg1n7nN goBGdKvkT6SSK+l1t3XJSxr9ze0ZmQMlSfV9G+6ipgHGKJllvyp9txG5S ojXOPEIPiSAsDAZ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,487,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20833958" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:15:24 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project Thread-Topic: Hadoop testing project Thread-Index: AQHLzhMOHwhWDZrkTkqV8PVHPGb3EJQGdgwA Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:15:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4224A6E6-D5A1-46FD-890D-4AAF4C14AEF7@linkedin.com> References: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> In-Reply-To: <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9460C078A739844A9E6F8BA3DA5A1FFB@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) change= s > from development into production." Take it one step further: when your cl= uster > is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, etc.); i= s it > desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing work-= load > you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: >=20 > wget http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v12.4.pom= \ > && mvn verify >=20 > and check the results later on? We need a definition of what 'validate' means. Is it "does stuff run"? I= n practice, that's useless. Even horribly misconfigured grids can usually = run something at least once.=20 From general-return-3064-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 17:21:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80896 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 17:21:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 67738 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67277 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67269 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 17:21:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:37 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=FPb9wrxgCk/rCEKpwRWWb/rnd9c2P0spwDY532qrTASwMZychhdHGaS9 SfFsdiOnWL7WyjhfZYCaUroUQ39L9MidO+yB2dkl10QC58iAto3jjWAdr IauVGsjHKVL/S1b; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297963292; x=1329499292; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20hdfsproxy=20HDFS=20c ontrib|Date:=20Thu,=2017=20Feb=202011=2017:22:49=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<8 23262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com>=0D=0A=20<0CB AFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=ZdESL3j2EcvViUolETjzzhSEae640PYtwKFu5+FUIP0=; b=HCo3oaflskkkLY30LFbKOxiho/tqt7MLoJwT5B9iRGS/NDWgVFWk9nb3 qCdzyix07uvrmvsI/PIl9D2f4XpJBQnEFavhMSMKTPQz0LP/YyJt0daLF 31QZOyxZKOcvheM; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,487,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20834215" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:22:49 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyZ27ICuajETxE02yFg9O1wZLWpP8Sq4AgAANWQCAAAYpgIAAQawAgAFtyICACCXggIAATYcA Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:22:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. We can thank the Apache Board for helping there as well. Their high hande= d interference basically set the project back 6 mos to a year; we're still = recovering from the general mistrust that their actions have instilled in t= he community. (If we recover. I'm not sure we will.)= From general-return-3065-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 17:34:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84599 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 17:34:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 17:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 1181 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:34:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 810 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 17:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 802 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 17:34:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:34:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:34:39 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1086324ewy.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.149 with SMTP id p21mr2019913wel.81.1297964058721; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:34:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:33:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <19DCD585-D5DC-43B9-8CA5-DAE6F949F5DC@Holsman.NET> References: <4D5BB6E4.8040403@apache.org> <20110216195012.GA29594@linspire.com> <19DCD585-D5DC-43B9-8CA5-DAE6F949F5DC@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:33:57 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Oh1UlMGCYe1XUhAoeSJ1hOweu20 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:45, Ian Holsman wrote: > I'm not sure it makes sense to =A0all the testing packages under a differ= ent umbrella that covers the code they test. > While there might be commonalities building a test harness, I would think= that each testing tool would need to have deep knowledge of the tool's int= ernals that it is testing. as such it would need someone with the experienc= e to code it. That's pretty much true indeed if you are talking about tests for a project or closely tightened projects such as Herriot in Hadoop. Speaking of tools there are some benefits though. Say, PigUnit and MRUnit are both xUnit frameworks. The former allows you to run Pig jobs in local and cluster mode. The latter is to validate MB jobs without a need to fire up a cluster. > I don't see what advantage combining PigUnit & say 'MRUnit' would be for = example. Don't you think Pig user would benefit if Pig scripts can be tested against MRUnit which gives you a flavor of cluster environment without one? Now, do you think it is likely that someone will go great lengths to make such an effort and build such a bridge right now? Cos > --I > On Feb 16, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Steve. >> >> If the project under discussion will provide a common harness where such= a test >> artifact (think of a Maven artifact for example) will click and will be >> executed automatically with all needed tools and dependencies resolved f= or you >> - would it be appealing for end-users' cause? >> >> As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) chang= es >> from development into production." Take it one step further: when your c= luster >> is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, etc.); = is it >> desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing work= -load >> you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: >> >> =A0 =A0wget http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v12.= 4.pom \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0&& mvn verify >> >> and check the results later on? >> >> These gonna be the same tools that dev. use for their tasks although wor= ksets >> will be different. So what? >> >> Cos >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:37AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>> On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >>>> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >>>> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I >>>> believe it has to be elaborated further. >>>> >>>> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >>>> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are >>>> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >>>> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or >>>> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. >>>> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >>>> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >>>> >>>> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >>>> project which will take care about development and support of common >>>> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to >>>> share your thoughts :) >>>> -- >>> >>> I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have their >>> own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables t= o >>> be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, >>> rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack onc= e >>> your latest patch is applied". >>> >>> That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and >>> cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do >>> -right now terasort is the main stress test. > > From general-return-3066-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 18:28:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18175 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 18:28:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 18:28:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 98655 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98282 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98273 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 18:28:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:28:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:27:58 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so2760990qyk.14 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:27:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=16fkgIJOhfB/umMin0p6eapsA2WF9CbSOU/DllMaXZE=; b=ui1Es1vIEkr891ARBLgFk9d//5L1ST194MizncL0xvOoMVYFxu4jZK67kEO16f162l LRPMp/YENzcD0evtgJHT6R7DnjG+yLzPxQqWkwF957v3gHIn0vJ+y2Sc5AwK82USkeyO 2YlfIq+gSpnz2ZcItPMuGDe18BljOVFJmQzh8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=HYrYmhdtNE9GxqSUiW2X47CFEXieKWiyvrXF3ZuzT+xpo/I2GNq36APjXMRqFQTpHe 8zImHWloBfGM0u4+FDbGae6/Whc9/xHJRCCSiTuTcjmCfpfPD9vGe1uQLfUAwn5bxXiX NN6jmnQw5fCkCXG9JiJ4e33jLjvuKSYfHfKRE= Received: by 10.229.79.135 with SMTP id p7mr2618629qck.154.1297967257540; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:27:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.79] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm886763qcs.4.2011.02.17.10.27.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:27:36 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:27:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0BEDB5ED-D1A2-4651-8BFB-7EE0911B8509@Holsman.NET> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: >> Hi Bernd. >>=20 >> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>=20 >>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed = in >>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>=20 >> This has been the situation in the past, >> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>=20 >> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main = code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 = branch, >> and their recent commits to trunk. >> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and = sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing = your concerns. >>=20 >> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see = the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in = MAPREDUCE-279. >>=20 >> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand = there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >=20 > I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. > Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think > that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into > the right direction. I also hope to see more as well... and hopefully we will start seeing = more and more of this from everyone. >=20 > Bernd From general-return-3067-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 18:37:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21950 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 18:37:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 18:37:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16417 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:37:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16101 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16093 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 18:37:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:37:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:37:21 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1HIaatw046252; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:36:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:36:36 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Ian Holsman Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:36:35 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project Thread-Topic: Hadoop testing project Thread-Index: AcvOySafP89cVP/JQsyA1di6+2nFcQACHQgN Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The biggest hurtle in hadoop adoption is that there is no easy way to setup a pseudo cluster on developer's machine. People are steering off course to build additional simulation tools and validation tools. In practice, those tools don't provide nearly enough insight in things that could go wrong in = a real cluster. For example, if a pig job uses HBaseStorage for accessing data. There is not a single hint that, the hbase-site.xml needs to be in a jar file in the pig class path for pig job to distribute the hbase environment to the MR cluster for the job to work. Regardless of how good the simulation tools, they are limited to the silo environment. What we ca= n do to improve the integration is to have a set of installable packages that can integrate well across hadoop ecosystems on the developer's machine. This is similar situation that mass majority of developer on LAMP stack, people don't start with compiling their own apache server and mysql server to start development and testing. They start by installing binary packages and getting their work tested on real software. Hence, hadoop developers bearing the responsibility of testing release packages, while end user developer should be responsible for certifying the integrated system on his/her own cluster. There are already a list of tool= s to validate a cluster, like Terasort or GridMix 1,2,3. I think the bigger concern is that Hadoop ecosystem does not have a standar= d method in linking dependencies. Hbase depends on Zookeeper, and Pig depend= s on Hadoop and Hbase. Then pig decided to put hadoop-core jar in it's own jar file. Chukwa depends on pig + hbase + hadoop and zookeeper. The version incompatibility is probably what driving people nuts. Hence, there is a new proposal on how to integrate among hadoop ecosystem. I urge project owners to review the proposal and provide feedbacks. The proposal is located at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12470823/deployment.pdf The related jiras are: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1857 There are plans to file more jiras for related projects. The integration would also be a lot easier if all related projects are using maven for dependency management. Regards, Eric On 2/17/11 9:33 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:45, Ian Holsman wrote: >> I'm not sure it makes sense to =A0all the testing packages under a diffe= rent >> umbrella that covers the code they test. >> While there might be commonalities building a test harness, I would thin= k >> that each testing tool would need to have deep knowledge of the tool's >> internals that it is testing. as such it would need someone with the >> experience to code it. >=20 > That's pretty much true indeed if you are talking about tests for a > project or closely tightened projects such as Herriot in Hadoop. > Speaking of tools there are some benefits though. Say, PigUnit and > MRUnit are both xUnit frameworks. The former allows you to run Pig > jobs in local and cluster mode. The latter is to validate MB jobs > without a need to fire up a cluster. >=20 >> I don't see what advantage combining PigUnit & say 'MRUnit' would be for >> example. >=20 > Don't you think Pig user would benefit if Pig scripts can be tested > against MRUnit which gives you a flavor of cluster environment without > one? Now, do you think it is likely that someone will go great lengths > to make such an effort and build such a bridge right now? >=20 > Cos >=20 >> --I >> On Feb 16, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>=20 >>> Steve. >>>=20 >>> If the project under discussion will provide a common harness where suc= h a >>> test >>> artifact (think of a Maven artifact for example) will click and will be >>> executed automatically with all needed tools and dependencies resolved = for >>> you >>> - would it be appealing for end-users' cause? >>>=20 >>> As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) chan= ges >>> from development into production." Take it one step further: when your >>> cluster >>> is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, etc.);= is >>> it >>> desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing >>> work-load >>> you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: >>>=20 >>> =A0 =A0wget http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v12= .4.pom \ >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0&& mvn verify >>>=20 >>> and check the results later on? >>>=20 >>> These gonna be the same tools that dev. use for their tasks although >>> worksets >>> will be different. So what? >>>=20 >>> Cos >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:37AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>> On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >>>>> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >>>>> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I >>>>> believe it has to be elaborated further. >>>>>=20 >>>>> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >>>>> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are >>>>> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >>>>> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop o= r >>>>> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. >>>>> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >>>>> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >>>>>=20 >>>>> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >>>>> project which will take care about development and support of common >>>>> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free t= o >>>>> share your thoughts :) >>>>> -- >>>>=20 >>>> I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have their >>>> own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables = to >>>> be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, >>>> rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack on= ce >>>> your latest patch is applied". >>>>=20 >>>> That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and >>>> cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do >>>> -right now terasort is the main stress test. >>=20 >>=20 >=20 From general-return-3068-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 18:44:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23658 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 18:44:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 18:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 35035 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:44:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34856 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34848 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 18:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.66] (HELO homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:44:02 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E33E76805C for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:43:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=xJ0Z92kpkoYmqht4+0N8MH8TX3xRP57liGiqKkarVzJupfucCCCk k1/bJqR1hXMpE9tE8yzxk0zX44ehTc6psBAa/1z+cYJ3sV9D80V+1fdW7jxEr7zi PJOqfE9effhdMdoIabrNuv+QEIxgitB/UmKytgoCCi4ZqX487R0Vjtg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=u/1lSHzqIi7ABGa1zkerj0rmSSE=; b=1yrH3btddSOainbdKafzFZCLmm46 qGO6vEPFC4M6l27P7sIJ8pfwufDT0yum002JHU16z00yw+ajYbSb1PFMinU4rRXN RZL/Vmer+nK3I3NSzQ3xl2IxWnOvjJzgz87mdV8smqtr6M+YTssPyfqFba8vdnaV XkGx8wf6UNiDjKQ= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAF74768061 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:43:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:43:46 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C995057CDD19@gbiv.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache > Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. > Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in > (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. > This is open source development upside down. It is not open development. The development community can do better, but it has to make up for past mistakes first. > It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code > and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every > line of code changed. That is simply untrue. If the code came from one company's employees and they all signed an employment agreement with their employer and the employer approves of the contribution and the committer knows that when they commit (and logs the authors of the patch when committed), then all necessary IP clearance has been done. Committers are = responsible for ensuring that they have permission to commit under their own CLA. > For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP = clearance process. Nonsense (with director hat on). > Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open > and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. No, you'll force people to work on the open by actually collaborating with them as they work and veto a patch for any technical faults it may contain. Pestering them about your personal view of the Apache Way of development is not a contribution. ....Roy From general-return-3069-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 18:48:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24673 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 18:48:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 18:48:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 41095 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:48:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40883 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 18:48:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40874 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 18:48:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:48:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:48:17 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2844498wye.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TuxYLXkkoM+3DVi7D5LloxKPWgxmnc4DOQOxIV0IrJs=; b=SpSjDWJY2/ro9Ft+zoIhcrvHo3zd9bJRWSqBeY0I/9Teud8/oe70QToEnKqwMpL241 EP2MoWw5B1IPPVp+J3RD10Rj3HXl5zJjSsMIf2/q7jcZeIQyB8wGtlj7N0N/d3arEmVs R6lOKGPdcdrPVlIBCqXzi64O6KxVBGM3MRZxM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=q7yEMZUC68a1XR+pvCQZzRUTsJwjI1EJ3Wp4Rx9om8gOllA6UEEIGjjdAm8AZ9+oBs Mav/sVgQtuwtyfcTJlTRFaoSo+tLhVscH/rzTJMdZdfEZx1jXRw/lO2Xu3tDte45DLF/ hbHZDiin7B8MjfVMaFHW3x0B9/dy5Y4oegvTQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.130 with SMTP id b2mr1959718wec.42.1297968476768; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:47:56 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: simple map reduce From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8c8dfcc99d049c7ed552 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dd8c8dfcc99d049c7ed552 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Helo all.. i create a simple map reduce .. to sum a valeu from a input file like : key, value 993, 3 993, 2 333, 2 etc .. like this.. public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { String line = value.toString(); String fields[] = line.split(","); output.collect(new Text(fields[0]), new IntWritable(Integer.parseInt(fields[1]))); } public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { int maxValue = 0; while (values.hasNext()) { maxValue += values.next().get(); } output.collect(key, new IntWritable(maxValue)); } Well.. my question is.. I had a another structure .. of input file key, value1, value2, value3 993, 3,2,3 993, 2,1,1 333, 2,2,1 How i can sendo to reduce a list of values, ? To process a list numers and not only one number? values must be added separately.. thanks for all .. --0016e6dd8c8dfcc99d049c7ed552-- From general-return-3070-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 19:12:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39108 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 19:12:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 19:12:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 70900 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:12:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70568 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:12:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70558 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 19:12:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:12:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:12:11 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3007237bwz.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:11:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vR2nVdHiuFEUzIN8+VMRjdjcHCoRbhwUFiLZ2cBua8s=; b=Fh/4kUDwpMxe44NQk1l0a8RcHj2ObK3bEeacdWzxRLXwe43gs/8JAmMOCe5HDfXI03 xQYHVSKbEhKCdUHgKh6H4on3og8f+tWuN0KMN7xmF/X7E2vMtn6AQvR5aKMsSVxWDb4q LYDWrERcwXXCcSPTcia0iopR2n6AqAgT2np7s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kmB7natCnu0vACwxPzDYGySuk+XQBZGeB8nMutvSDX+zUahAqsOEKZce57Xcs5he0K tcgiN0dfYofPXiLjEbREuH0FEdUpqCStfQBEMNziHIST8eC8bi/JFyQjERh/F1RgbfxR r65AiIiWw3kyLP80L9062ZjZ/ORioHlzBZBYI= Received: by 10.204.70.137 with SMTP id d9mr2071343bkj.141.1297969910357; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:11:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.215 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:11:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:11:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Bernd Fondermann Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5aa556f9e07049c7f2bcc --001636c5aa556f9e07049c7f2bcc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: Engineers writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also includes IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use tools such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned engineers, etc. The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific subset of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more successfully reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and HBase, for example, have all gone this path. A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same source tree as Hadoop. - Aaron On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball wrote: > > The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that I > > believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in > the > > best interest of its users. > > Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) > Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit > from the same source where I get my MR from. > Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. > > > Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not > > require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client > library > > that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. > > +1. > > > My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can > > derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill this > > role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project, I > > believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly and > > continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. > > What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? > Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR > community? > > Bernd > --001636c5aa556f9e07049c7f2bcc-- From general-return-3071-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 19:21:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41569 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 19:21:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 19:21:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 79052 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:21:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78593 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78585 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 19:21:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:21:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:21:43 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2877792wye.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:21:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.170.149 with SMTP id p21mr2127198wel.81.1297970482344; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:21:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:21:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:21:02 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9fedkSwpQufm2MDbacG1smNltsk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eric. I am sure that packaging of Hadoop and other application working directly with Hadoop is a highly needed thing (although there's always a tricky question how many platforms you plan to provide packaging for, etc.). What we are discussing here is software testing, not packaging nor integration issues between packaged bits. If you want to - please start a separate discussion to avoid steering this thread away and not mixing the issues. Cos > I think the bigger concern is that Hadoop ecosystem does not have a stand= ard > method in linking dependencies. =A0Hbase depends on Zookeeper, and Pig de= pends > on Hadoop and Hbase. =A0Then pig decided to put hadoop-core jar in it's o= wn > jar file. =A0Chukwa depends on pig + hbase + hadoop and zookeeper. =A0The > version incompatibility is probably what driving people nuts. =A0Hence, t= here > is a new proposal on how to integrate among hadoop ecosystem. =A0I urge > project owners to review the proposal and provide feedbacks. > > The proposal is located at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12470823/deployment.pdf > > The related jiras are: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1857 > > There are plans to file more jiras for related projects. =A0The integrati= on > would also be a lot easier if all related projects are using maven for > dependency management. > > Regards, > Eric > > On 2/17/11 9:33 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:45, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> I'm not sure it makes sense to =A0all the testing packages under a diff= erent >>> umbrella that covers the code they test. >>> While there might be commonalities building a test harness, I would thi= nk >>> that each testing tool would need to have deep knowledge of the tool's >>> internals that it is testing. as such it would need someone with the >>> experience to code it. >> >> That's pretty much true indeed if you are talking about tests for a >> project or closely tightened projects such as Herriot in Hadoop. >> Speaking of tools there are some benefits though. Say, PigUnit and >> MRUnit are both xUnit frameworks. The former allows you to run Pig >> jobs in local and cluster mode. The latter is to validate MB jobs >> without a need to fire up a cluster. >> >>> I don't see what advantage combining PigUnit & say 'MRUnit' would be fo= r >>> example. >> >> Don't you think Pig user would benefit if Pig scripts can be tested >> against MRUnit which gives you a flavor of cluster environment without >> one? Now, do you think it is likely that someone will go great lengths >> to make such an effort and build such a bridge right now? >> >> Cos >> >>> --I >>> On Feb 16, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> Steve. >>>> >>>> If the project under discussion will provide a common harness where su= ch a >>>> test >>>> artifact (think of a Maven artifact for example) will click and will b= e >>>> executed automatically with all needed tools and dependencies resolved= for >>>> you >>>> - would it be appealing for end-users' cause? >>>> >>>> As Joep said this "...will reduce the effort to take any (set of ) cha= nges >>>> from development into production." Take it one step further: when your >>>> cluster >>>> is 'assembled' you need to validate it (on top of a concrete OS, etc.)= ; is >>>> it >>>> desirable to follow N-steps process to bring about whatever testing >>>> work-load >>>> you need or you'd prefer to simply do something like: >>>> >>>> =A0 =A0wget http://workloads.internal.mydomain.com/stackValidations/v1= 2.4.pom \ >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0&& mvn verify >>>> >>>> and check the results later on? >>>> >>>> These gonna be the same tools that dev. use for their tasks although >>>> worksets >>>> will be different. So what? >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:37AM, Steve Loughran wrote: >>>>> On 15/02/11 21:58, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>>> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >>>>>> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >>>>>> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and = I >>>>>> believe it has to be elaborated further. >>>>>> >>>>>> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >>>>>> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those ar= e >>>>>> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >>>>>> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop = or >>>>>> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop= . >>>>>> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >>>>>> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >>>>>> >>>>>> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >>>>>> project which will take care about development and support of common >>>>>> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free = to >>>>>> share your thoughts :) >>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be good though specific projects will need/have thei= r >>>>> own testing needs -I'd expect more focus for testing redistributables= to >>>>> be on helping Hadoop users test their stuff against subsets of data, >>>>> rather than the hadoop-*-dev problem of "stressing the hadoop stack o= nce >>>>> your latest patch is applied". >>>>> >>>>> That said, the whole problem of qualifying an OS, Java release and >>>>> cluster is something we'd expect most end user teams to have to do >>>>> -right now terasort is the main stress test. >>> >>> >> > > From general-return-3072-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 19:28:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42813 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 19:28:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 19:28:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 86803 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:28:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86575 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86561 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 19:28:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:28:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3022031bwz.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Ix7Eb32bt4zcySoYxulTiPyqSOhYguiJcXnYhTOfXLo=; b=yEsE8En5fl+4/GElrOjqfbrROg0zR9IsUT+ktIFVUlPra9J+9VJ/giu7irxRn08sip gxlUBCNboEJCMY2Y+nykeGT5YxBagZBYZ7feyJDtDtu2hes2jCnKo7nGT2HKA6CFqARG 3+W1PSHXjbuEpCQdGsuKtqn0/C5HjN4S036TA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=ooZpLrNaMoQ2kRmmaqVm3/3i7gRPWwzCF9rtgNn0pOhnN5bwLOc1Oy5rB80H5RRILf 9MxG/NK/i+CUF4M2pn4viLFvvgRIn79jZtpgyBQK1SEQhLBScilpxTgWuN+70gNWOHnD 3N8/pi68WZWnJp1F7jRYYwz0Hzda3cGUT9X4I= Received: by 10.204.70.137 with SMTP id d9mr2086176bkj.141.1297970865771; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.215 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:27:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5aa55621419049c7f6469 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5aa55621419049c7f6469 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Working to develop code as a client of Hadoop is a path full of landmines. The more tools we can provide to users to improve the quality of their code, the better. I think it is important, though, to draw a clear distinction between tools intended for different audiences. Talking about system testing tools for Hadoop release/QA processes is good, but one of the benefits I see of calling MRUnit (designed for client app developers) out of the Hadoop project at large is to increase its usability. Conflating it with a system testing tool (for release engineers) would not fulfill that need. As long as the new project can release several distinct artifacts in a way that makes their intent clear to the user community, I'm in favor of gathering as many perspectives on Hadoop testing under one "roof" as possible. - Aaron On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Rottinghuis, Joep wrote: > +1 > Having a coherent approach for system level testing increases confidence in > the various Hadoop releases and and will reduce the effort to take any (set > of ) changes from development into production. > The more automated and formalized system testing, the better! > > Thanks, > > Joep > ________________________________________ > From: cos@boudnik.org [cos@boudnik.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Boudnik [ > cos@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 1:58 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce > contrib] > > While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like > to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that > discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I > believe it has to be elaborated further. > > A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related > component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are > MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all > focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or > on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. > However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of > projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. > > How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing > project which will take care about development and support of common > (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to > share your thoughts :) > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: > > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll ping > > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > >> > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > >> > wrote: > >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville for > >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. > >> > > >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I would > >> > also be happy to be a mentor. > >> > > >> > Patrick > --001636c5aa55621419049c7f6469-- From general-return-3073-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 19:31:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43842 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 19:31:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 19:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1744 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:31:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1671 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 19:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1663 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 19:31:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:31:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.106] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:31:41 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1HJVFVS015478 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:31:16 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:31:09 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: Bernd Fondermann Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:31:06 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvO2ToMCBnqejDYTC26veHnO5fsSg== Message-ID: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Guys, FYI on this: Eric has mentioned he is going to start the Incubator proposal= for MRUnit. Let's start small and then grow big (as needed). It seems like= we've achieved enough consensus for the required mentors and critical mass= to make an MRUnit Incubator proposal and then to have the Incubator commun= ity weigh in. If that expands to include other testing projects/etc., we ca= n address that over the Incubation process, and as needed.=20 Eric: as soon as that wiki page is up, I'd be happy to add my name to it as= a mentor and /kick the can on this. Cheers, Chris On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: Engine= ers > writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also includes > IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use tools > such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned > engineers, etc. >=20 > The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific sub= set > of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more successfu= lly > reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and HBa= se, > for example, have all gone this path. >=20 > A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple > versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same sour= ce > tree as Hadoop. >=20 > - Aaron >=20 > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball wrot= e: >>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that = I >>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in >> the >>> best interest of its users. >>=20 >> Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) >> Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit >> from the same source where I get my MR from. >> Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. >>=20 >>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not >>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client >> library >>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >>=20 >> +1. >>=20 >>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community can >>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill thi= s >>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project,= I >>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly a= nd >>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >>=20 >> What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? >> Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR >> community? >>=20 >> Bernd >>=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3074-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 20:03:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53021 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 20:03:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 20:03:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 58540 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 20:03:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58208 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 20:03:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58197 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 20:03:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:03:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:03:43 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2895404wwd.29 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.132 with SMTP id x4mr804972wex.81.1297973002318; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:03:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.82.194 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:03:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:03:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6xd6zYCj-Jupm22HEX7ceANyx2Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib] To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Aaron Kimball Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:27, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Working to develop code as a client of Hadoop is a path full of landmines= . > The more tools we can provide to users to improve the quality of their co= de, > the better. I think it is important, though, to draw a clear distinction > between tools intended for different audiences. Talking about system test= ing > tools for Hadoop release/QA processes is good, but one of the benefits I = see > of calling MRUnit (designed for client app developers) out of the Hadoop > project at large is to increase its usability. Conflating it with a syste= m > testing tool (for release engineers) would not fulfill that need. Yup, they are different all right. > As long as the new project can release several distinct artifacts in a wa= y > that makes their intent clear to the user community, I'm in favor of > gathering as many perspectives on Hadoop testing under one "roof" as > possible. That's the goal. > - Aaron > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Rottinghuis, Joep > wrote: > >> +1 >> Having a coherent approach for system level testing increases confidence= in >> the various Hadoop releases and and will reduce the effort to take any (= set >> of ) changes from development into production. >> The more automated and formalized system testing, the better! >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joep >> ________________________________________ >> From: cos@boudnik.org [cos@boudnik.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Boudnik = [ >> cos@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 1:58 PM >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Hadoop testing project [Was: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce >> contrib] >> >> While MrUnit discussion draws to its natural conclusion I would like >> to bring up another point which might be well aligned with that >> discussion. Patrick Hunt has brought up this idea earlier today and I >> believe it has to be elaborated further. >> >> A number of testing projects both for Hadoop and Hadoop-related >> component were brought to life over last year or two. Among those are >> MRUnit, PigUnit, YCSB, Herriot, and perhaps a few more. They all >> focusing on more or less the same problem e.g. validation of Hadoop or >> on-top-of-Hadoop components, or application level testing for Hadoop. >> However, the fact that they all are spread across a wide variety of >> projects seems to confuse/mislead Hadoop users. >> >> How about incubating a bigger Hadoop (Pig, Oozie, HBase) testing >> project which will take care about development and support of common >> (where's possible) tools, frameworks and the like? Please feel free to >> share your thoughts :) >> -- >> =A0Take care, >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44, Eric Sammer wrote: >> > I've started the wiki page proposal for Incubator for mrunit. I'll pin= g >> > people off list for mentoring. Much appreciated for all the help! >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> > >> >> I'm happy to help mentor as well. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nige >> >> >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Guys, BTW, if you need help or a mentor in Apache Incubator-ville = for >> >> MRUnit, I would be happy to help. >> >> > >> >> > I was going to suggest the same thing (mrunit to incubator). I woul= d >> >> > also be happy to be a mentor. >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> > From general-return-3075-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 21:00:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77528 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 21:00:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 21:00:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 55567 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:00:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55436 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:00:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55425 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 21:00:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:00:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:00:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 77006 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 21:00:31 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3014315iwn.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:00:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.179.132 with SMTP id bq4mr3461636icb.293.1297976430276; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:00:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.174.193 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:00:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:00:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib From: Patrick Hunt To: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris a page is up (still being created by Eric afaict): http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal I took the liberty of listing us as mentors. Patrick On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > FYI on this: Eric has mentioned he is going to start the Incubator propos= al for MRUnit. Let's start small and then grow big (as needed). It seems li= ke we've achieved enough consensus for the required mentors and critical ma= ss to make an MRUnit Incubator proposal and then to have the Incubator comm= unity weigh in. If that expands to include other testing projects/etc., we = can address that over the Incubation process, and as needed. > > Eric: as soon as that wiki page is up, I'd be happy to add my name to it = as a mentor and /kick the can on this. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > >> The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: Engin= eers >> writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also includes >> IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use tools >> such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned >> engineers, etc. >> >> The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific su= bset >> of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more successf= ully >> reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and HB= ase, >> for example, have all gone this path. >> >> A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple >> versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same sou= rce >> tree as Hadoop. >> >> - Aaron >> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < >> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball wro= te: >>>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is that= I >>>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is in >>> the >>>> best interest of its users. >>> >>> Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) >>> Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit >>> from the same source where I get my MR from. >>> Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. >>> >>>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not >>>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client >>> library >>>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >>> >>> +1. >>> >>>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community ca= n >>>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill th= is >>>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this project= , I >>>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly = and >>>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >>> >>> What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? >>> Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR >>> community? >>> >>> Bernd >>> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: =A0 http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > From general-return-3076-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 21:22:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92497 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 21:22:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 21:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 83304 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:22:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83233 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:22:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83222 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 21:22:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:22:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:22:19 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2999947wye.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:21:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ynExP/Su4oHiIX/AkGboMALODLLUBXQSEMegDMfK5oY=; b=DNPrVO6pn8DECFqZrGmnXLvUCyjJqf0AXHs/XOBl9yZWGYmgk1Ul0THcQY2SE4JZBg 8jzi6KKU6W0WXr2sHsWYiBK6bzEUaZIy17bgWhQ6UcGQ1QXhjGcNcN8xjsKu7zZOhOOt 0bRqHbccRwxQomHORRL5DQsEG30JBAd6HMKts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Fp7geDvOyXoHeNDjhVBcAXV/GyY10Pi2wX4IzSjsPBppbsvEKmW8pSnUlO9ldreyQH 6A/UhYhOFA23B/tUCKWmwQ4ZH9jZ9n35jjPY/eQIx1Vf69zyE0izfw561Kg+T/mQ9PDE R2DBeF0mjQqC+vPsUPpR/TU4BtRxDHGtNMYTM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.84 with SMTP id q20mr2127311wbt.72.1297977717653; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.72.133 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:21:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:21:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64974e0c9813e049c80fc0c --0016e64974e0c9813e049c80fc0c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hdfsproxy is a wrapper around hftpFileSystem (in its current state). So you can always replace hdfsproxy with hftpFileSystem. Also it uses pure FileSystem api, so it can successfully be maintained outside of hdfs. Therefore I am +1 removing it from hdfs/contrib. What is the use case for hdfsproxy anyways? Thanks, --Konstantin On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >>>> I think the PMC should abandon the hdfsproxy HDFS contrib component. >>>>> It's >>>>> last meaningful contribution was August 2010: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -1 we still use and are maintaining this. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Who's the 'we'? Looking at HDFS-1164 it looks like hdfsproxy was failing >>> a unit test for 7 months. This is exactly the reason we should thoughtfully >>> consider whether it has a future within Hadoop. >>> >>> Perhaps Y! uses a different version of hdfsproxy? >>> >> >> They probably have patched it, and mistakenly forgot to submit them >> > Yes, we have some updates that we haven;t got around to pushing around > > .. any chance of doing a diff on your version and submitting it? >> > > > I will check into this and get back. > We are also working to incorporate some of the features of the proxy into > hdfs proper -- if that work completes and is accepted by the community then > hdfs proxy may become > less useful. > > Hence, for now, my vote is -1 for removing hdfs proxy. > > sanjay > > sanjay > >> >> Regards >> Ian >> >> >>> Nige >>> >>> >> > --0016e64974e0c9813e049c80fc0c-- From general-return-3077-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 21:25:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93609 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 21:25:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 21:25:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 88722 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88629 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88621 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 21:25:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:25:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:25:42 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=h1LDvivOuWFlbJt/pY1xpplV5AlShp5891johTnMriVwNCbxNVfMlD4l TPOf1lDJ4J8GroSAE+4pPgeblQqpxLgSVJ2Vs67PnQxOoL4/Zw11lfOAN KKOanOmKWvJJd1+; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1297977939; x=1329513939; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20hdfsproxy=20HDFS=20c ontrib|Date:=20Thu,=2017=20Feb=202011=2021:26:54=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<71308072-C3D4-4A90-A4E7-588C91C5D088@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<504A3A45A83EF14083C24E6167EF9191@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20 <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com>=0D=0A=20<0 CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET>=0D=0A=20 =0D =0A=20; bh=XD5zD7I3Vb3vcr7goloisqsVXb64wJFMqKBDYO3nPOY=; b=aB+gdM4ND1LgLD22wxEcFTkLGBhG6VHZ670spVWpMMlO5pOvnUDnq9h9 1y6Hr9lTwgpYvNTOu/nMZfrkXgKpHauzsyWeeAKsGT51cZanBAt7slc7g DMMSbkGftboBAOm; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,182,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="20287068" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:26:54 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyZ27ICuajETxE02yFg9O1wZLWpP8Sq4AgAANWQCAAAYpgIAJS9iAgAEaQoCAAADyAA== Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:26:54 +0000 Message-ID: <71308072-C3D4-4A90-A4E7-588C91C5D088@linkedin.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <504A3A45A83EF14083C24E6167EF9191@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > hdfsproxy is a wrapper around hftpFileSystem (in its current state). > So you can always replace hdfsproxy with hftpFileSystem. > Also it uses pure FileSystem api, so it can successfully be maintained > outside of hdfs. >=20 > Therefore I am +1 removing it from hdfs/contrib. >=20 > What is the use case for hdfsproxy anyways? A stable, secure http get interface for files. (No, the normal web ui is = not good enough. Think firewalls.). From general-return-3078-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 17 21:52:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5003 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2011 21:52:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2011 21:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 40200 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:52:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40088 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2011 21:52:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40072 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2011 21:52:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:52:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.106] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:52:37 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1HLqCOL006089 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:52:13 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:52:12 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:52:09 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvO7O5pLUWIIUuZTh+5q5F8HHyjHw== Message-ID: <5C5BE47B-6159-4678-8455-219CF1F41863@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Patrick. Sounds good. Besides mentors, we need a champion, who must be an ASF member= . So, either me, you or Nigel can do it. I'm already championing Gora, and = would be happy to champion MRUnit, but am open to either one of you guys do= ing it too (or even another ASF member). Just let me know. I'll head over t= o the wiki and add my info. Thanks for getting this started Eric+Patrick! Cheers, Chris On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > Chris a page is up (still being created by Eric afaict): > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal >=20 > I took the liberty of listing us as mentors. >=20 > Patrick >=20 > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hey Guys, >>=20 >> FYI on this: Eric has mentioned he is going to start the Incubator propo= sal for MRUnit. Let's start small and then grow big (as needed). It seems l= ike we've achieved enough consensus for the required mentors and critical m= ass to make an MRUnit Incubator proposal and then to have the Incubator com= munity weigh in. If that expands to include other testing projects/etc., we= can address that over the Incubation process, and as needed. >>=20 >> Eric: as soon as that wiki page is up, I'd be happy to add my name to it= as a mentor and /kick the can on this. >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Chris >>=20 >> On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: >>=20 >>> The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: Engi= neers >>> writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also includes >>> IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use tool= s >>> such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned >>> engineers, etc. >>>=20 >>> The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific s= ubset >>> of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more success= fully >>> reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and H= Base, >>> for example, have all gone this path. >>>=20 >>> A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple >>> versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same so= urce >>> tree as Hadoop. >>>=20 >>> - Aaron >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < >>> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball wr= ote: >>>>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is tha= t I >>>>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is i= n >>>> the >>>>> best interest of its users. >>>>=20 >>>> Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) >>>> Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit >>>> from the same source where I get my MR from. >>>> Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. >>>>=20 >>>>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should not >>>>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client >>>> library >>>>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >>>>=20 >>>> +1. >>>>=20 >>>>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community c= an >>>>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill t= his >>>>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this projec= t, I >>>>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickly= and >>>>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >>>>=20 >>>> What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? >>>> Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR >>>> community? >>>>=20 >>>> Bernd >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>=20 >>=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3079-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 03:16:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56898 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 03:16:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 03:16:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 66777 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 03:16:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66159 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 03:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66151 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 03:16:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:16:07 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3261882fxm.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:15:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=aGFnWBN28iKEjpTUEMJz242edcRcZXEaD842M4aFisM=; b=tkb50Js4HMisw5OzTGs0Fyw8BT8Cyoa0uY/BOsYI+SPuOnEYxdd4bUnr9Yw51XH896 EnuZxUokMaqbFeu+Duf66r38VRVfQLDe2MnZRezrzdUi969FuWyefh03SPSHVoMQsSKw kWQNOyH1yTtaVj+nHGXx+Fqh2PtPfgKpjSi+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=LZwSbVN2DcTM7YJwqpIls32r9BK3yeAKpgl5zvJbKJTqZwZWykGsECJWDSZYcVys/u /Kqf2uE3eqkUKIr2ygIUI1LpBoq9u6/LtniCRLX8R201S4jnHFi4qayvUB/vZiIImMvN i+DD99uvimE+anG1EUaXxjop1xT+aIqQ172lg= Received: by 10.223.83.194 with SMTP id g2mr253455fal.75.1297998945077; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:15:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.122.83 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:15:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:45:25 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: simple map reduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > I had a another structure .. of input file > key, value1, value2, value3 > 993, 3,2,3 > 993, 2,1,1 > 333, 2,2,1 > > How i can sendo to reduce a list of values, ? To process a list numers and > not only one number? > values must be added separately.. An IntWritable can't obviously hold a sequence of integers. So you need a different data structure to hold a sequence of integers. From the available bank of Writables in Hadoop, you can perhaps use an ArrayWritable initialized for IntWritable members. -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-3080-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 06:11:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30375 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 06:11:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 06:11:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66609 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 06:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66182 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 06:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66171 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 06:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:11:16 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3417109iwn.35 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.39.73 with SMTP id f9mr259853ibe.79.1298009455173; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:10:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.42.201 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:10:34 -0800 (PST) From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:10:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase 0.90.1 available for download To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255752fe7da23b049c886054 --0003255752fe7da23b049c886054 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Apache HBase team is happy to announce the general availability of HBase 0.90.1, available from your Apache mirror of choice: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ [at the time of this writing, not all mirrors have updated yet -- please pick a different mirror if your first choice does not show 0.90.1] HBase 0.90.1 is a maintenance release that fixes several important bugs since version 0.90.0, while retaining API and data compatibility. The release notes may be found on the Apache JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12315548 Users upgrading from HBase 0.90.0 may upgrade clients and servers separately, though it is recommended that both be upgraded. If upgrading from a version of HBase prior to 0.90.0, please read the notes accompanying that release: http://osdir.com/ml/general-hadoop-apache/2011-01/msg00208.html As always, many thanks to those who contributed to this release! -The HBase Team --0003255752fe7da23b049c886054-- From general-return-3081-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 10:12:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20773 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 10:12:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 10:12:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 73631 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 10:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73080 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 10:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73072 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 10:12:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:12:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:12:19 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3585966iwn.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:11:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PNMA50ktIQxKHR5wLRwpzNxP46y1BENja+FY/x0qBc0=; b=ZTBIxzkqQBmuafwKJNXr7oNmYoQYh/7Rb4UbclltOcFan4hZO+f0MW7MWh6VSE/yGc UiGPtrGD1dp2u5vuZhI25VbwG8l/o0+xghAFv1xlGwfI/Bo5u7j5sLW5CNgUZmYM/qc6 sVOxOB8hVEb03KPQrQPiP7Dp8KOwlVGtGeFSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hAtDBK5mE8095X/Y3alYDAkkHT2Cd2C3Qjn0gmg/ZkIN4uoeuo3RCWfv+JJOV9HuMj wrWwp0962NHapXgFq1iV/Q3M5O4b5Lvtlopzk/NnPgZ+qFKesr5py2xuih0uNSZTnMUM zR4dUFr58eVcoWTLKmryhi7uAMkyrNE4vZjxw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.213.66 with SMTP id gv2mr670456icb.81.1298023918638; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:11:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C995057CDD19@gbiv.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C995057CDD19@gbiv.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:11:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 19:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >> This is open source development upside down. > > It is not open development. =A0The development community can do better, > but it has to make up for past mistakes first. > >> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >> line of code changed. > > That is simply untrue. =A0If the code came from one company's employees > and they all signed an employment agreement with their employer and > the employer approves of the contribution and the committer knows that > when they commit (and logs the authors of the patch when committed), > then all necessary IP clearance has been done. I don't know how many Y-employees are working on H internally. Only the contributors can sort that out. > Committers are responsible > for ensuring that they have permission to commit under their own CLA. I just wanted to point that out, not stop someone from contributing. Of course, your words are much more precise than mine. >> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearance = process. > > Nonsense (with director hat on). > >> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. > > No, you'll force people to work on the open by actually collaborating > with them as they work and veto a patch for any technical faults it > may contain. =A0Pestering them about your personal view of the Apache Way > of development is not a contribution. Getting personal is not a valuable contribution either. Bernd From general-return-3082-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 10:43:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27307 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 10:43:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 10:43:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 4620 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 10:43:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4124 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 10:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4116 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 10:43:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:43:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:43:10 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so3532131wye.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:42:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=81zbayNj19YL8aqox2zpW0KFx6RFNLTNbYh7TUtHVDI=; b=AM4tyvkcOq8m79RULyfoL5apemwzV1d/ALudlp5gRTNA7HbfwGfBwoRSJPggPh78Jn e61/R3sUZOzY2mqgvfp2QqHscwH3cvcSFaZRevRW9mgRGZg8JX+lxQjScXpj2BWmhco4 +EykdatSVrhXnIQG1u0T4Dcoz4dOArszgsRfs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wlAfelTlt6YTLCzN6yy7k2hmU8/14ZCU9ARRCF/VckBG3JfORlZK6pRs+tz9qPKhI/ q1QrZ2Pm7X8tHRSKEriq0eq/Z1i8APQpc9V/U2r7kHFKRgThhrWfeQ/S7vLfJEaBo+wr MtiXhm0quJv56yeTz9c/oA8SvA0OBaSOWk4m8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.85 with SMTP id d63mr465685wel.12.1298025769258; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:42:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:42:49 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: simple map reduce From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Harsh J Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6469722e2ce6c049c8c2c79 --0016e6469722e2ce6c049c8c2c79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I need extend ArrayWritable ??? like this : public class IntArrayWritable extends ArrayWritable { public IntArrayWritable() { super(IntWritable.class); } } On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Harsh J wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Alessandro Binhara > wrote: > > I had a another structure .. of input file > > key, value1, value2, value3 > > 993, 3,2,3 > > 993, 2,1,1 > > 333, 2,2,1 > > > > How i can sendo to reduce a list of values, ? To process a list numers > and > > not only one number? > > values must be added separately.. > > An IntWritable can't obviously hold a sequence of integers. So you > need a different data structure to hold a sequence of integers. From > the available bank of Writables in Hadoop, you can perhaps use an > ArrayWritable initialized for IntWritable members. > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --0016e6469722e2ce6c049c8c2c79-- From general-return-3083-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 11:29:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47701 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 11:29:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 11:29:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 57312 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 11:29:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56905 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 11:29:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56897 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 11:29:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:29:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:29:23 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p1IBSAlA029083; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:28:10 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 03:28:06 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AcvPXuvCx9X6ZAWyRGaLq9e8FwlbKg== Message-ID: <89BF364A-2A1F-49B7-9A91-F25C6E8A83F0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <71308072-C3D4-4A90-A4E7-588C91C5D088@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <71308072-C3D4-4A90-A4E7-588C91C5D088@linkedin.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well put Allen.=20 My thinking is to move this API into HDFS removing the need for HDFS proxy.= Then you can use the http proxy of your choice if you have needs for a pro= xy (we do this for external bandwidth management, security and ip space pre= servation reasons).=20 I'm +1 for removing it.=20 We can always revive the project in extras if the API changes hit a wall.=20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:26 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" = wrote: >=20 > On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >=20 >> hdfsproxy is a wrapper around hftpFileSystem (in its current state). >> So you can always replace hdfsproxy with hftpFileSystem. >> Also it uses pure FileSystem api, so it can successfully be maintained >> outside of hdfs. >>=20 >> Therefore I am +1 removing it from hdfs/contrib. >>=20 >> What is the use case for hdfsproxy anyways? >=20 > A stable, secure http get interface for files. (No, the normal web ui= is not good enough. Think firewalls.). >=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-3084-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 12:25:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69666 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 12:25:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 12:25:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8133 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 12:25:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7596 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 12:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7582 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 12:25:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:03 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so3595008iyb.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:24:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fQG8Fe/NTt0TUMN7kw3d8bjINPOC1mD/EH/fc63hJ98=; b=eLmZRtpOJ9oz7CMvFLQS247MLl7zry96v8NWeaOtpxnOTr/u/tcQYOpDHbpAaWpYdT hdM1HVcbz1KYmbZdeCYitOW2xMVIRw8wmn0WUROenEUS+D89g/B86QfFaIo0xfknQn3u yqvKwsTkBE3a9gHvmmAqyhelYrBV0GgarCBsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ljJdcaRigrqmRXkzllt0FXaZArXTJ6b2jIU3vUQcXH6rdGWsSuwHLXZRzkW0RVJeIy Azf/AA/jcH+jWFN7tT8e7okTzKZzkfGCxyCRlH0HE0coLBl83GifY8uqlElC9QMAjXGZ sh0CbfUcxUAb7B3+u9lnSH2PQfTGPt+CeEMn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.225.68 with SMTP id ir4mr787730icb.291.1298031882490; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:24:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.170.197 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:24:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:24:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "Aaron T. Myers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Aaron, Thanks for following up on this issue for us. Has dfs.datanode.du.pct been depreciated? On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 > > -- > Aaron T. Myers > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> Thanks for the response. >> >> It would be nice to have a feature like this. It will make our data >> nodes much more flexible. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Harsh J wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with >> > this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, >> > reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> >> On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it >> >> possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% >> >> usage? >> > >> > According to the release's code: No. >> > >> > (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not >> recommended.) >> > >> > -- >> > Harsh J >> > www.harshj.com >> > >> > From general-return-3085-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 12:47:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82579 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 12:47:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 12:47:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 33598 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 12:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32841 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 12:47:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32833 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 12:47:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:47:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:46:54 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1ICkCUS074757 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:46:12 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:46:06 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AcvPadI6Be8tLPCgTTeEGkYt3V5Hew== Message-ID: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Bernd, Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but Hadoo= p is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and cluster = sizes.=20 There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People select= Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / problem grows= , Hadoop can grow with it.=20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: >> Hi Bernd. >>=20 >> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>=20 >>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>=20 >> This has been the situation in the past, >> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>=20 >> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main co= de base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 branc= h, >> and their recent commits to trunk. >> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and sheperdin= g it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your concern= s. >>=20 >> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see th= e recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in MAPREDU= CE-279. >>=20 >> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand th= ere is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >=20 > I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. > Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think > that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into > the right direction. >=20 >>> This is open source development upside down. >>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >>> line of code changed. >>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearance= process. >>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >>>=20 >>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained here. >>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >>> Release branches stagnate. >>=20 >> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being extre= mely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. >> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least 5= 0 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for some= one to verify. >=20 > It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get > there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this > size. >=20 >>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate doors= . >>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( >>> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen= / >>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is >>> an improvement. >>>=20 >>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, >>> well, so be it. >>=20 >>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized >>> cluster instead. >>=20 >>=20 >> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there w= ho rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to se= e hadoop become something that only runs well on >> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. >=20 > But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. >=20 > Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase > into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized > clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month > time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open > source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without > becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on > the low-end and medium sized users. >=20 > I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end > users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* > obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and > developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't > need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, > they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. > All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't > have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. >=20 > Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to > the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big > companies either. > Focus on all the users. >=20 > Bernd From general-return-3086-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 13:21:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98710 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 13:21:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 13:21:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 68325 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 13:21:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67859 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 13:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67851 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 13:21:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:21:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:21:07 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3741295iwn.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:20:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W936eqJIUYN1ShV49bb+8RSaCYHFkUWvtstY04RJfyk=; b=KC1+PACb81MgJrzOmkxHNd4JZ6/aLOICkRX/Qo467rkIe8nnkUs/irgfz9jIPUti7s TvhEmlFyab1xr5/0+7YF4lJxnWRW32Rv/UtxiHSE2uZf6ccykfXEGScknX8Q/2b67NQr rlk9KZbdq0jFt1C6iWvMcwUFOJJrvQldvAfNc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U4EuzTkMg2wOtRKL+frAdH7hr8br2LztE6IMBHbxFBPN65Qs8EfwNwe92NGNgm+P4X 2lWdxfwseA98ZT0iqftYUJUhYDTUbN0oVYy7Ud8QFrpUrkOUQT0T0xKi1mLO/8BOh4xU CZHp+Zz9S3U1YSWOPR19nHopP8aDI8b+2Pa3g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.117.130 with SMTP id t2mr872697icq.148.1298035246317; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.8.149 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:20:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:20:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:46, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > Hi Bernd, > > Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but Had= oop is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and cluste= r sizes. > > There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People sele= ct =A0 Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / problem g= rows, Hadoop can grow with it. Please note that I did not say that Hadoop should not scale. I know that winning Sorting contests is a great achievement and a huge selling point. I'm thinking along the lines of: How much scalability would the majority of users be willing to trade for a. more active committers (guess: 0%) b. more regular releases c. more non-scalability features (hot standby NN, security, younameit) I for myself as a low-scale user *would* trade a few percent for b. and c. Thanks, Bernd > --- > E14 - via iPhone > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> Hi Bernd. >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>> >>>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >>>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>> >>> This has been the situation in the past, >>> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>> >>> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main c= ode base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 bran= ch, >>> and their recent commits to trunk. >>> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and sheperdi= ng it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your concer= ns. >>> >>> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see t= he recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in MAPRED= UCE-279. >>> >>> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand t= here is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >> >> I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. >> Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think >> that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into >> the right direction. >> >>>> This is open source development upside down. >>>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >>>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >>>> line of code changed. >>>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearanc= e process. >>>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >>>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >>>> >>>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >>>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained here= . >>>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >>>> Release branches stagnate. >>> >>> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being extr= emely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. >>> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least = 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for som= eone to verify. >> >> It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get >> there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this >> size. >> >>>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >>>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >>>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate door= s. >>>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( >>>> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextge= n/ >>>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >>>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >>>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is >>>> an improvement. >>>> >>>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >>>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >>>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >>>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, >>>> well, so be it. >>> >>>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >>>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >>>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized >>>> cluster instead. >>> >>> >>> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there = who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to s= ee hadoop become something that only runs well on >>> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. >> >> But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. >> >> Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase >> into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized >> clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month >> time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open >> source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without >> becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on >> the low-end and medium sized users. >> >> I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end >> users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* >> obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and >> developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't >> need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, >> they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. >> All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't >> have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. >> >> Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to >> the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big >> companies either. >> Focus on all the users. >> >> =A0Bernd > From general-return-3087-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 14:41:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24393 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 14:41:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 14:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 78169 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 14:41:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77706 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 14:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77689 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 14:41:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:41:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:40:53 +0000 Received: from [156.148.71.202] (neuron.crs4.it [156.148.71.202]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0259D790177 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:40:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D5E84DC.6050200@crs4.it> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:40:28 +0100 From: Simone Leo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101216 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of) HOD since 2008 and we still use it in production. We use Hadoop 0.20.2 since it was released one year ago. Simone On 02/12/11 06:15, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including >>> it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. >> >> Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds have >> dependencies on python. > > But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures > causing the build to fail. > >>> b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the >>> topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months >>> or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib >>> modules other than the schedulers and streaming. >> >> Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work >> with 0.20 or beyond. > > Out of curiosity, what goes wrong? Clearly nothing major has changed in > starting up a mapreduce cluster in a very long time. > >>> c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that >>> we've ignored. >> >> Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. > > There are also some patches on core Hadoop that have been sitting for a > long time, so I don't think that is a valid inference. > > I would love to hear some of the people who are using HOD speak up and > give us their feedback. > > -- Owen -- Simone Leo Data Fusion - Distributed Computing CRS4 POLARIS - Building #1 Piscina Manna I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it http://www.crs4.it From general-return-3088-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 16:11:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70158 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 16:11:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 16:11:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26312 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:11:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24788 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24780 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 16:11:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:11:25 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=tE1zIGWLusT49xEaPADyUvyaEcxbe7OzED6+Tjl2haXcKIXbfsg7H+gl LwTWy+5IsoiHgmPjPNjU2HajWWurwiQW00HH/ipJahC44VAiwVI0Wzghy RiWmNoW2xMuq1OW; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1298045482; x=1329581482; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Abandon=20hdfsproxy=20HDFS=20c ontrib|Date:=20Fri,=2018=20Feb=202011=2016:11:38=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<8 23262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com>=0D=0A=20<0CB AFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C9950 57CDD19@gbiv.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=Y3LM5rprKKoMY5fH4kbG7nuv68pUybNRMdRMC9h+TSI=; b=ET6zWQHVbBlmFUCp0/tH61izMzBbkLrjG8n5zoLjcG7Epw7D+a0aYRUQ 1YJ/B7Mi3zV8tVmXC1QPQJVwLWYR7k5St1V4/sq+E4y3RXUddYzX2OSkC FpzsSoe+vsvwVWS; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,187,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="20310592" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:11:39 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib Thread-Index: AQHLyZ27ICuajETxE02yFg9O1wZLWpP8Sq4AgAANWQCAAAYpgIAAQawAgAFtyICACCXggIAAZJQAgAEDVgCAAGQLAA== Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:11:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C995057CDD19@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I don't know how many Y-employees are working on H internally. Only > the contributors can sort that out. Did Carol Bartz run over your puppy or something? You don't appear to rea= lize that pretty much all the major companies that house the major committe= rs are doing essentially the same thing: work on a major feature patch wit= h their internal teams then offer up the patch mostly complete, having deal= t with all of the minor nits on the way due to having field tested it for r= eal. The patches still get discussed before getting committed. In some c= ases, this has resulted in either the patch getting rejected/not committed = or reworked. I sometimes wonder if the people who troll the team realize that Hadoop is= essentially a distributed, networked operating system. That requires a hi= gher level of quality control than a simple framework.=20 From general-return-3089-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 16:26:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77447 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 16:26:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 16:26:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 54645 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:26:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54085 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:26:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54077 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 16:26:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:26:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:26:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CCAB7D7E for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:26:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jIRSyn0SL+8y for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:25:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F9CB7DA6 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:24:38 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1298651065.8959@BqKvN1FIx0ZTkKF1hOgh7Q Received: from [16.24.210.8] ([16.24.210.8]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p1IGOPaa022745 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:24:25 GMT Message-ID: <4D5E9D33.5040003@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:24:19 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p1IGOPaa022745 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 17/02/2011 18:36, Eric Yang wrote: > I think the bigger concern is that Hadoop ecosystem does not have a standard > method in linking dependencies. Hbase depends on Zookeeper, and Pig depends > on Hadoop and Hbase. Then pig decided to put hadoop-core jar in it's own > jar file. Chukwa depends on pig + hbase + hadoop and zookeeper. The > version incompatibility is probably what driving people nuts. Hence, there > is a new proposal on how to integrate among hadoop ecosystem. I urge > project owners to review the proposal and provide feedbacks. > > The proposal is located at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12470823/deployment.pdf > > The related jiras are: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1857 > > There are plans to file more jiras for related projects. I think a focus on RPMs/debs and then say "local VM for testing", because that gets people used to deploying on Linux from day one, rather than developing on windows and being surprised that things work differently in production. You still have the problem of debugging remotely to a VM in the VLAN, but that's tractable. > The integration > would also be a lot easier if all related projects are using maven for > dependency management. Do you mean Maven the tool or the maven repo format? From general-return-3090-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 16:40:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84159 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 16:40:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 16:40:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 85116 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84764 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84752 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 16:40:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:40:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:40:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 84056 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 16:40:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:40:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:40:09 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: pdf design documents X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Owen has recently submitted several PDF design documents, e.g.: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7150 I feel PDF discourages collaboration. Either plain text or HTML would permit folks to more easily provide feedback, either as patches or as alternate drafts. Some projects use their wikis to collaboratively evolve designs, so everyone can see the document evolve from the start. Some projects use the dev mailing list directly for design. Any of these would be preferable to me to PDF, which only the original submitter can easily edit. What do others think? Thanks, Doug From general-return-3091-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 16:59:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91209 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 16:59:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 16:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 21877 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:59:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20937 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 16:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20921 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 16:59:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:59:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.227] (HELO qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:59:42 +0000 Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9UzB1g0051GhbT85CUzNdl; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:59:22 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9UzA1g02E2SbwD53TUzDD7; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:59:20 +0000 Message-Id: <778FC6F7-8658-4E01-8710-2F384F22452F@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-60--233915219 Subject: Re: simple map reduce Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:59:08 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-60--233915219 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please keep user questions on mapreduce-user as per http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html . On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > I need extend ArrayWritable ??? like this : > > public class IntArrayWritable extends ArrayWritable { public > IntArrayWritable() { super(IntWritable.class); } } Yes. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-60--233915219-- From general-return-3092-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 17:13:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4718 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 17:13:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:13:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 47135 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:13:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46771 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46763 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:13:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:13:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.32] (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:13:13 +0000 Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9V771g0070EPchoA3VCrzw; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:12:51 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 9VCi1g0182SbwD58MVClh2; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:12:49 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: pdf design documents Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:12:41 -0800 References: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > I feel PDF discourages collaboration. Either plain text or HTML would > permit folks to more easily provide feedback, either as patches or as > alternate drafts. Ok, I've upload the latex files. -- Owen From general-return-3093-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 17:48:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14167 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 17:48:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:48:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 90907 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90517 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:48:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90507 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:48:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:48:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 14085 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:48:28 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username mahadev, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:48:28 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so3887454wwd.29 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:48:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.137 with SMTP id 9mr1739620wep.97.1298051306210; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:48:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.50.134 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:48:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:48:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pdf design documents From: Mahadev Konar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "Owen O'Malley" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am unsure why this is being discussed on general. I havent seen any contributor to ignore request for source of the design document. If someone wants to edit or submit a new one, just commenting on the jira and asking for it should be enough. no? thanks mahadev On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> I feel PDF discourages collaboration. =A0Either plain text or HTML would >> permit folks to more easily provide feedback, either as patches or as >> alternate drafts. > > Ok, I've upload the latex files. > > -- Owen > From general-return-3094-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 17:49:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14339 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 92338 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92268 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92259 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:49:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of atm@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:49:46 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so3671908qwe.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.6.79 with SMTP id 15mr878295qay.168.1298051365362; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.228.138 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question To: Mag Gam Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cb06c885c40049c922242 --0015175cb06c885c40049c922242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Mag, Per http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html, general@ is not the best place for this discussion. Let's continue this on the actual JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Aaron, > > Thanks for following up on this issue for us. > > Has dfs.datanode.du.pct been depreciated? > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: > > Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 > > > > -- > > Aaron T. Myers > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the response. > >> > >> It would be nice to have a feature like this. It will make our data > >> nodes much more flexible. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Harsh J > wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with > >> > this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, > >> > reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> >> On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it > >> >> possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% > >> >> usage? > >> > > >> > According to the release's code: No. > >> > > >> > (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not > >> recommended.) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Harsh J > >> > www.harshj.com > >> > > >> > > > --0015175cb06c885c40049c922242-- From general-return-3095-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 17:50:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14472 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 17:50:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 17:50:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 93859 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:50:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93664 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 17:50:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93656 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 17:50:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:50:11 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1IHnElf058087 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:28 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:49:27 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop testing project Thread-Topic: Hadoop testing project Thread-Index: AcvPiLHk7gmOLvkMQFyo8weY8+9nlAAC32ky Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D5E9D33.5040003@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/18/11 8:24 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > On 17/02/2011 18:36, Eric Yang wrote: >=20 >> I think the bigger concern is that Hadoop ecosystem does not have a stan= dard >> method in linking dependencies. Hbase depends on Zookeeper, and Pig dep= ends >> on Hadoop and Hbase. Then pig decided to put hadoop-core jar in it's ow= n >> jar file. Chukwa depends on pig + hbase + hadoop and zookeeper. The >> version incompatibility is probably what driving people nuts. Hence, th= ere >> is a new proposal on how to integrate among hadoop ecosystem. I urge >> project owners to review the proposal and provide feedbacks. >>=20 >> The proposal is located at: >>=20 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12470823/deployment.pdf >>=20 >> The related jiras are: >>=20 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1857 >>=20 >> There are plans to file more jiras for related projects. >=20 > I think a focus on RPMs/debs and then say "local VM for testing", > because that gets people used to deploying on Linux from day one, rather > than developing on windows and being surprised that things work > differently in production. You still have the problem of debugging > remotely to a VM in the VLAN, but that's tractable. >=20 Packaging, VM testing, scale, then deployment automation. My goal is "deployment automation", and this requires polishing each steps along the way. For hadoop testing project, it depends on the type of testing that yo= u are focus on. It will be easier to understand the scope and apply implementation. >> The integration >> would also be a lot easier if all related projects are using maven for >> dependency management. >=20 > Do you mean Maven the tool or the maven repo format? >=20 I meant both, it is a little easier to manage dependencies in maven build tools than ivy, and deploying jar files to maven repository is also an essential mean for integrate project more closely. Regards, Eric From general-return-3096-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 18:00:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17455 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 18:00:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 18:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8873 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8772 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8764 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:00:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:00:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:00:23 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1IHxmGF034051 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:59:49 -0800 From: Todd Papaioannou To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:59:38 -0800 Subject: Re: pdf design documents Thread-Topic: pdf design documents Thread-Index: AcvPlaGMGMf3USiJRdiuvTIQVvOZ5g== Message-ID: <11E7A42F-1DBF-4249-BD41-CC2148FFC3A2@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Last time I checked, ctrl-c ctrl-v works just fine with PDF documents too..= . Thanks, Todd On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:19 PM, "Mahadev Konar" wrote: > I am unsure why this is being discussed on general. I havent seen any > contributor to ignore request for source of the design document. If > someone wants to edit or submit a new one, just commenting on the jira > and asking for it should be enough. no? >=20 > thanks > mahadev >=20 > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >>=20 >> On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >>=20 >>> I feel PDF discourages collaboration. Either plain text or HTML would >>> permit folks to more easily provide feedback, either as patches or as >>> alternate drafts. >>=20 >> Ok, I've upload the latex files. >>=20 >> -- Owen >>=20 From general-return-3097-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 18:34:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41567 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 18:34:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 18:34:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 54224 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:34:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53620 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:34:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53610 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:34:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:34:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:34:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 41445 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:33:40 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:33:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4D5EBB83.30405@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:33:39 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: pdf design documents References: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/18/2011 09:12 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, I've upload the latex files. Thanks, Owen! Doug From general-return-3098-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 18:40:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43828 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 18:40:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 18:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 69269 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68863 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 18:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68504 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:40:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:40:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:40:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 43477 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 18:39:47 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:39:47 +0000 Message-ID: <4D5EBCF2.1060800@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:39:46 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: pdf design documents References: <4D5EA0E9.5070103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 02/18/2011 09:48 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > I am unsure why this is being discussed on general. I feel this is an issue of general interest and wanted to find out how others felt about it, not just those following those two particular issues. Over the years, on several projects, I've expressed my preference that project documents be posted in open, editable formats. I don't recall this being discussed on Hadoop, but, if it has, it's been a while and seems to have been forgotten, so I thought I'd raise it as an issue of general policy so that we can all come to some agreement on this. Doug From general-return-3099-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 19:10:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62753 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 19:10:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 19:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 22373 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:10:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21965 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21957 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 19:10:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:09:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1IJ9QiZ014503 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:09:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:09:26 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:09:25 -0800 Subject: Re: pdf design documents Thread-Topic: pdf design documents Thread-Index: AcvPm19lPhV3tRv8RsGdtqDhWdPzzwAA/v68 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D5EBCF2.1060800@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C98403E5FBE0eyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C98403E5FBE0eyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml format in t= he proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to edit/revise the d= esign doc, it should be fine right? Regards, Eric On 2/18/11 10:39 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: On 02/18/2011 09:48 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > I am unsure why this is being discussed on general. I feel this is an issue of general interest and wanted to find out how others felt about it, not just those following those two particular issues. Over the years, on several projects, I've expressed my preference that project documents be posted in open, editable formats. I don't recall this being discussed on Hadoop, but, if it has, it's been a while and seems to have been forgotten, so I thought I'd raise it as an issue of general policy so that we can all come to some agreement on this. Doug --_000_C98403E5FBE0eyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3100-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 19:50:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77364 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 19:50:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 19:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 94614 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:50:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94288 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94280 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 19:50:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 77238 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 19:50:32 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.144]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:32 +0000 Message-ID: <4D5ECD86.6080104@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:50:30 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: pdf design documents References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/18/2011 11:09 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml > format in the proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to > edit/revise the design doc, it should be fine right? Yes, that looks great to me. I am just proposing that, when a design is first presented as a proposal intended for collaborative feedback prior to implementation that it be provided in a format that's easy for all to modify. Does that seem unreasonable? Doug From general-return-3101-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 19:55:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78628 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 19:55:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 19:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 8201 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7992 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:55:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7983 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 19:55:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:55:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.161] (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:55:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1298058910; l=1404; s=domk; d=brainlounge.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=thvBk0NH0cfPEGsqz6sMsHrdWTk=; b=fSKFF0AlmmT096n9kUB4qmGlm59k1RRjcuEI+GcbcYYBwn90DDtYyGYSCCqEX87HOE4 F9CwLJcrG3anuNwrhUXLk4RLwP66Kc325xHvJBBnMivkFk5gpcohMDcOLB6W9WxXfJFwc dZXVO5wc3EIhUkSnXeBjbOtsvs8P30uBKq0= X-RZG-AUTH: :LmkWe0TmffCene0uRkJY6AqDWBjdcSs8EVOKK4t9JJpSMjflHqg6LsBmWxPH/k40rz9aRX/I1Oxv X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from vitamin.local (e180164016.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.164.16]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo61) (RZmta 25.5) with ESMTPA id o03027n1IJ5VQs for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:55:09 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4D5ECE9D.9030603@brainlounge.de> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:55:09 +0100 From: Bernd Fondermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <1FEA58C1-AA9A-4A6F-8873-C995057CDD19@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18.02.11 17:11, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> I don't know how many Y-employees are working on H internally. Only >> the contributors can sort that out. > > Did Carol Bartz run over your puppy or something? Something, definitively. I assume EOR. > You don't appear to realize that pretty much all the > major companies that house the major committers > are doing essentially the same thing: > work on a major feature patch with their internal > teams then offer up the patch mostly complete, having > dealt with all of the minor nits on the way due to > having field tested it for real. I realize that. I even critized it: The fact that a closed group develops code until they donate it to the project in smaller or larger chunks. Whoever these closed groups are, I don't make a difference. > The patches still get discussed before getting committed. > In some cases, this has resulted in either the patch > getting rejected/not committed or reworked. Sounds good. > I sometimes wonder if the people who troll the team > realize that Hadoop is essentially a distributed, networked > operating system. I realize that. > That requires a higher level of quality control than a simple framework. Which again is only accessible to a closed group. Which excludes the rest of the committership. Bernd From general-return-3102-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 19:58:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79065 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 19:58:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 19:58:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12134 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:58:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12056 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 19:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12047 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 19:58:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:58:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:58:48 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so4070666wye.35 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:58:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6kNZqHA7GN4p+l9yhDTrX5HbUjkMY1YxaE0k61EBqU8=; b=tBFO72RzamjpPxEpw+/cuYEzY5xApV6bwR9dX9Sq6PTQ8DVuw2Kl9Z2X7Em9d89FPa LBRXUBG1DxxwCQrb13L29NKVUKTolkyUAgPO0B1FEMxHGktWJtZRo0xsbGncgwsPyfmM ySNu71cRtTeJAIP53OtgaYEKsldq+9QfotyqU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OE7/HJqwLtOWZpI/m0exa//AzlXtjCffQClpkxdE5pt4lzO6reyVjp/s0rXyqvN6+K /Y4/GyCsAZ3N+QdRIX57db7co9uvKjwvEqsstT1+9/b3LJrUYPM2OAF540dpzoLnIkO8 jQY3xoE1cJiau5iN9PiwaOPPfwV/PD0HOmprU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.173.147 with SMTP id v19mr1109145wel.102.1298059097513; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.255.147 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:58:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D5ECD86.6080104@apache.org> References: <4D5ECD86.6080104@apache.org> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:58:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pdf design documents From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b6440679fa3049c93ef2f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367b6440679fa3049c93ef2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would request that a pdf version be provided too (along with the other editable formats), it just makes it easier for me to read it without much effort. It helps me keep up with new designs that are being proposed, even though I am not competent enough to comment/collaborate on those designs. thanks, dhruba On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 02/18/2011 11:09 AM, Eric Yang wrote: > > FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml > > format in the proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to > > edit/revise the design doc, it should be fine right? > > Yes, that looks great to me. I am just proposing that, when a design is > first presented as a proposal intended for collaborative feedback prior > to implementation that it be provided in a format that's easy for all to > modify. Does that seem unreasonable? > > Doug > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --0016367b6440679fa3049c93ef2f-- From general-return-3103-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 18 22:50:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46689 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2011 22:50:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 22:50:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 96507 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 22:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96286 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2011 22:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96189 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2011 22:50:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:50:06 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1IMnLnQ081974 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:49:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:49:21 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:49:19 -0800 Subject: Re: pdf design documents Thread-Topic: pdf design documents Thread-Index: AcvPpTDCWh5GU1GQTH6VxIqF8YPHIQAGOLYN Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D5ECD86.6080104@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 The editable proposal is good advice. It would be nice to present both editable version and read-only version to track the history of the proposal= . If it comes down to streamline efficiency, having editable proposal is preferred. Hence, I will use editable document next time. Regards, Eric On 2/18/11 11:50 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > On 02/18/2011 11:09 AM, Eric Yang wrote: >> FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml >> format in the proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to >> edit/revise the design doc, it should be fine right? >=20 > Yes, that looks great to me. I am just proposing that, when a design is > first presented as a proposal intended for collaborative feedback prior > to implementation that it be provided in a format that's easy for all to > modify. Does that seem unreasonable? >=20 > Doug >=20 From general-return-3104-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 20 02:53:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85349 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2011 02:53:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2011 02:53:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 83057 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 02:53:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82694 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2011 02:53:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82686 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2011 02:53:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:53:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.149.139.106] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (128.149.139.106) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:53:23 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p1K2qx5N027040 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:53:00 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.82]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([128.149.137.73]) with mapi; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:53:00 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:52:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib Thread-Index: AcvQqUhm+SfJyMwYTW2glxPixqv2qQ== Message-ID: <70074956-0C23-4CA2-A414-6F1C2C6453F2@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> <5C5BE47B-6159-4678-8455-219CF1F41863@jpl.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: <5C5BE47B-6159-4678-8455-219CF1F41863@jpl.nasa.gov> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.73] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Guys, I took a pass at the MRUnit proposal [1]. It's far from complete, but just = letting you know I took a swipe :) Cheers, Chris [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Thanks Patrick. >=20 > Sounds good. Besides mentors, we need a champion, who must be an ASF memb= er. So, either me, you or Nigel can do it. I'm already championing Gora, an= d would be happy to champion MRUnit, but am open to either one of you guys = doing it too (or even another ASF member). Just let me know. I'll head over= to the wiki and add my info. Thanks for getting this started Eric+Patrick! >=20 > Cheers, > Chris >=20 > On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >=20 >> Chris a page is up (still being created by Eric afaict): >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal >>=20 >> I took the liberty of listing us as mentors. >>=20 >> Patrick >>=20 >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> wrote: >>> Hey Guys, >>>=20 >>> FYI on this: Eric has mentioned he is going to start the Incubator prop= osal for MRUnit. Let's start small and then grow big (as needed). It seems = like we've achieved enough consensus for the required mentors and critical = mass to make an MRUnit Incubator proposal and then to have the Incubator co= mmunity weigh in. If that expands to include other testing projects/etc., w= e can address that over the Incubation process, and as needed. >>>=20 >>> Eric: as soon as that wiki page is up, I'd be happy to add my name to i= t as a mentor and /kick the can on this. >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>> Chris >>>=20 >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: >>>=20 >>>> The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: Eng= ineers >>>> writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also include= s >>>> IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use too= ls >>>> such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned >>>> engineers, etc. >>>>=20 >>>> The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific = subset >>>> of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more succes= sfully >>>> reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and = HBase, >>>> for example, have all gone this path. >>>>=20 >>>> A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple >>>> versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same s= ource >>>> tree as Hadoop. >>>>=20 >>>> - Aaron >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < >>>> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball w= rote: >>>>>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is th= at I >>>>>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is = in >>>>> the >>>>>> best interest of its users. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) >>>>> Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit >>>>> from the same source where I get my MR from. >>>>> Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should no= t >>>>>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client >>>>> library >>>>>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. >>>>>=20 >>>>> +1. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community = can >>>>>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill = this >>>>>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this proje= ct, I >>>>>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more quickl= y and >>>>>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. >>>>>=20 >>>>> What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? >>>>> Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR >>>>> community? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Bernd >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>> Senior Computer Scientist >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 >=20 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-3105-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 21 06:03:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59942 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2011 06:03:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2011 06:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 67406 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 06:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66896 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 06:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66888 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2011 06:02:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:02:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 06:02:45 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LGY007ADE40GB10@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:25 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-20_08:2011-02-19,2011-02-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102200156 From: Nigel Daley Subject: precommit testing gone crazy Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:24 -0800 Message-id: <784E9D98-E8EE-4DCC-824B-94F63B8973CE@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Apologies. Looks like the precommit testing control file got corrupted over the weekend and most Patch Available issues got run thru Hudson again. Nige From general-return-3106-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 21 15:31:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7153 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2011 15:31:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2011 15:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 94808 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:31:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92377 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92358 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2011 15:31:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:31:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.201.117.226 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kiddlee1989@gmail.com) Received: from [74.201.117.226] (HELO smtp.stumbleupon.com) (74.201.117.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:31:37 +0000 Received: from www.stumbleupon.com (sv4web54 [10.4.21.44]) by smtp.stumbleupon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6976E1A for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:31:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=stumbleupon.com; s=mail; t=1298302275; bh=6skzqyc1a+vuGBoMD56I3rngtYmSzOtJi8LewnQQrRo=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=SQz2Dr0oO9ZYS07GDjTI7lZIO/DqZT7DZyYXhu9nf4ow7g16kEAhjWW1R4Ys0dd+S Jiv5iFQiHzcp3m5eKSL+3BXeV1ojepGzrJrfY7znqyXVcJOSJv2OSc4BCg/IBlu5s4 bNuDLPwlPReEYDO3ylz6Z+OvNsELVSlkHLQFrAz0= Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:31:15 -0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" From: kiddlee Reply-to: kiddlee Subject: Join me on StumbleUpon! Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.1 (phpmailer.sourceforge.net) Sender: service@stumbleupon.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_d1eaea1bb8d7747992288877ae9ab4a1" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --b1_d1eaea1bb8d7747992288877ae9ab4a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [StumbleUpon] (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/home1/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Dinvite%2526u%253Duf1q) Join for free (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/home2/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Dinvite%2526u%253Duf1q) I've been discovering great stuff on the web with StumbleUpon and I think you'll love it! Join now so we can see and share each other's favorite web pages. It only takes a minute - check it out! - kiddlee StumbleUpon is a discovery engine that finds the best of the web, recommended just for you. Learn more (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/hf/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F) If you do not wish to receive emails sent by StumbleUpon, please click here (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/oo/__eNrLKCkpsNLXLy8v1ysuKc1NykktLcjP00vOz9XPyy_JTMtMTizJzM8r1ivIKLBPzU3MzEnOT0m1DfMM9opy8QgN9o4IdbTw8VQrqSxItfXMK8ssSQVcMCpDHrk%252C) (c) StumbleUpon 2001 - 2011 --b1_d1eaea1bb8d7747992288877ae9ab4a1-- From general-return-3107-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 21 15:32:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7655 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2011 15:32:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2011 15:32:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 99484 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97991 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97671 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2011 15:32:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:32:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.201.117.226 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kiddlee1989@gmail.com) Received: from [74.201.117.226] (HELO smtp.stumbleupon.com) (74.201.117.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:32:36 +0000 Received: from www.stumbleupon.com (sv4web7 [10.4.27.36]) by smtp.stumbleupon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB1972E8 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:31:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=stumbleupon.com; s=mail; t=1298302275; bh=5MoYH+CVRaxNHnGoyI76RdwjUxqB8Z7p2jFgIhUmqTk=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=GtlNKug+3wU+kVDqH8TsBhcu2KD/QHw2I0HuxBh1Zxgk14D0JFZWRjQFSxC0Udbrt /G+0YBAp3emVMnbV0JD4ItjlnQF2k+9UACa/ZDejxPkutr1Bv3k2gRUqIpdkYsDkQF LGbE0vKalU4Y2IwC6qGoRj7TQn0RCHpz441X4r3c= Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:31:15 -0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" From: kiddlee Reply-to: kiddlee Subject: Join me on StumbleUpon! Message-ID: <059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271@www.stumbleupon.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.1 (phpmailer.sourceforge.net) Sender: service@stumbleupon.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --b1_059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [StumbleUpon] (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/home1/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Dinvite%2526u%253Duf1q) Join for free (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/home2/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Dinvite%2526u%253Duf1q) I've been discovering great stuff on the web with StumbleUpon and I think you'll love it! Join now so we can see and share each other's favorite web pages. It only takes a minute - check it out! - kiddlee StumbleUpon is a discovery engine that finds the best of the web, recommended just for you. Learn more (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/hf/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F) If you do not wish to receive emails sent by StumbleUpon, please click here (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/oo/__eNrLKCkpsNLXLy8v1ysuKc1NykktLcjP00vOz9XPyy_JTMtMTizJzM8r1ivIKLBPzU3MzEnOT0m1DfMM9opy8QgN9o4IdbTw8VQrqSxItfXMK8ssSQVcMCpDHrk%252C) (c) StumbleUpon 2001 - 2011 --b1_059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271-- From general-return-3108-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 21 15:50:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13533 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2011 15:50:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2011 15:50:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22183 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:50:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21684 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 15:50:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21676 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2011 15:50:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:49:57 +0000 Received: by vxc41 with SMTP id 41so1172674vxc.35 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:49:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DyQdSpvujpF3L40X+OREiKL2xuopYTA6ICTXZK+xWTQ=; b=MjPEk4WSFXWw0H5F31zfhQADb4qIl2BEqyUQsiggFqZK9ELlkLdn0oQyhMiZvDikXg mOD7jfkFjt+lPXFaCs9nntySefLWZLRwl7E0sxIM/yKxn7WojDB11vcBP45djeQq/nHI jVezqG1Fkg1TciNbkZTVw1gBLHZzv6yTShqnE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QiJNciX8lh6qfSlZOI1qgM4/aJjiD55L45l0UrFIj9pJ7KZj/F0Pb0or5abn2U24Rv rwnYjCk+MPsNdCAg3cBVK0jlWQb753S4fEbCP2clvtoh8bsW/HoYLAzXA1XvQnXcztff koMFdibdarYuZhOBXyNuBwEymYUZnFpvX3Yhk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.167.72 with SMTP id zm8mr2112796vdb.172.1298303376251; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.167.132 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:49:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271@www.stumbleupon.com> References: <059927cba83651ee30d3f7ce1a664271@www.stumbleupon.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:49:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Join me on StumbleUpon! From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org, kiddlee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org lol On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, kiddlee wrote: > [StumbleUpon] > (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/invite-4/home= 1/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Dinvite%2526u%253= Duf1q) > Join for free (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI= /invite-4/home2/https%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F%253Fpre%253Din= vite%2526u%253Duf1q) > > I've been discovering great stuff on the web with StumbleUpon and I think= you'll love it! > Join now so we can see and share each other's favorite web pages. =A0It o= nly takes a minute - check it out! > - kiddlee > > > StumbleUpon is a discovery engine that finds the best of the web, recomme= nded just for you. > Learn more (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/in= vite-4/hf/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.stumbleupon.com%252F) > > > > > If you do not wish to receive emails sent by StumbleUpon, please > click here (http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/e/849181372:VISJZDHUSKXUA8LI/in= vite-4/oo/__eNrLKCkpsNLXLy8v1ysuKc1NykktLcjP00vOz9XPyy_JTMtMTizJzM8r1ivIKLB= PzU3MzEnOT0m1DfMM9opy8QgN9o4IdbTw8VQrqSxItfXMK8ssSQVcMCpDHrk%252C) > > > (c) StumbleUpon 2001 - 2011 > > From general-return-3109-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 21 21:33:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67382 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2011 21:33:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2011 21:33:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7023 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 21:33:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6145 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2011 21:33:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6098 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2011 21:33:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:33:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:33:30 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanaghi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrdNR-0004he-25; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:33:05 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: isabel@apache.org Subject: Call for Presentations Berlin Buzzwords - one more week to go Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:19:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201102211319.02523.isabel@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6564839.KPnVJzyG1M"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart6564839.KPnVJzyG1M Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As a reminder: the call for presentations of Berlin Buzzwords will close next week on Tuesday, March 1st. Submissions on scalable search, data storage and analysis are all welcome. We are looking for presentations on the core technologies such as Apache Hadoop, CouchDB, Lucene, Redis, Voldemort but also talks on interesting use cases and system architectures: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/call-presentations We are very proud to announce that Doug Cutting as well as Ted Dunning have= =20 agreed to join us as keynote speakers. Several very interesting talk propos= als=20 have been submitted already. The list of accepted speakers will be publishe= d=20 soon after the CfP closes. Tickets are out for sale - don=E2=80=99t wait to= o long to get=20 your early bird ticket. In addition we are in the process of drafting some additional packages for those of you who would like to bring their non-tech spouse to the conference or need day care facilities for their children. If you are interested in either package please provide feedback online: http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/one-big-family http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/children-welcome Looking forward to seeing you in Berlin this summer, Isabel --nextPart6564839.KPnVJzyG1M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1i1sYACgkQPJpCBAwIhbSTmACfc2Q8huWjg+qwzSgXhQ6/uBV9 ooMAn0JbLNm4ogR6WZGsoxlJgpvq4KUw =Uo0t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6564839.KPnVJzyG1M-- From general-return-3110-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 22 01:55:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69775 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2011 01:55:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2011 01:55:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 97316 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 01:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97208 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 01:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97200 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2011 01:55:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:55:22 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so1893895bwz.37 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:55:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0EbUmCw8xP1EpiEBxbIVxCkFgYEHDZhcKMW6WOFVV40=; b=n6pekDXNIKI7Gvr4Zu94gEZf4W2LUdkrgVytw7d5JebD++2r0IIXDwfbrFEALW+OjM 3k+ajunacMeDS5TnpUNazVVuqBw/rn76by1LVfvfZSAnxMhM8TKAWAXlc/bDxORazHOJ cJnjilVEb2H6zm2CixRWyyep+mTqWe1dm29LY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=f+doKXkPuvWrC97xdnLxwhuRnRxdnXMQ79qt+/ADaANSJNAsWwu7JLt0BBtAZ92pUj fxPf08b4Gbng2Ewlc5VrQtkXg2aNU73oQgw/kgTKHOkIDFFugv6VcIZ8aVZaweadcuEx ZtlEhDR3M+ZMlnN4BaPGVDVZZ6tK9cRZTA3m8= Received: by 10.204.75.142 with SMTP id y14mr1982311bkj.114.1298339702087; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:55:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.215 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:54:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <70074956-0C23-4CA2-A414-6F1C2C6453F2@jpl.nasa.gov> References: <77405974-6771-4604-926B-976240743F3C@mac.com> <93644D3B-4830-4813-92BE-809738969CF9@apache.org> <65311075-A30E-4971-A2BA-C75409C6486E@jpl.nasa.gov> <5C5BE47B-6159-4678-8455-219CF1F41863@jpl.nasa.gov> <70074956-0C23-4CA2-A414-6F1C2C6453F2@jpl.nasa.gov> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:54:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon mrunit MapReduce contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7efd7bda03b049cd54466 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7efd7bda03b049cd54466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have made some revisions and improvements here too.. - Aaron On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I took a pass at the MRUnit proposal [1]. It's far from complete, but just > letting you know I took a swipe :) > > Cheers, > Chris > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > > Thanks Patrick. > > > > Sounds good. Besides mentors, we need a champion, who must be an ASF > member. So, either me, you or Nigel can do it. I'm already championing Gora, > and would be happy to champion MRUnit, but am open to either one of you guys > doing it too (or even another ASF member). Just let me know. I'll head over > to the wiki and add my info. Thanks for getting this started Eric+Patrick! > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > >> Chris a page is up (still being created by Eric afaict): > >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRUnitProposal > >> > >> I took the liberty of listing us as mentors. > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > >> wrote: > >>> Hey Guys, > >>> > >>> FYI on this: Eric has mentioned he is going to start the Incubator > proposal for MRUnit. Let's start small and then grow big (as needed). It > seems like we've achieved enough consensus for the required mentors and > critical mass to make an MRUnit Incubator proposal and then to have the > Incubator community weigh in. If that expands to include other testing > projects/etc., we can address that over the Incubation process, and as > needed. > >>> > >>> Eric: as soon as that wiki page is up, I'd be happy to add my name to > it as a mentor and /kick the can on this. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > >>> > >>>> The MRUnit community is a specific subset of the Hadoop community: > Engineers > >>>> writing Java code running on Hadoop. The Hadoop community also > includes > >>>> IT/ops staff who maintain Hadoop clusters, data scientists who use > tools > >>>> such as Pig & Hive, as well as those written by the aforementioned > >>>> engineers, etc. > >>>> > >>>> The Hadoop project has long recognized that tools aimed at a specific > subset > >>>> of the Hadoop community, with separate release cycles, can more > successfully > >>>> reach their aims by splitting into incubator projects. Hive, Pig, and > HBase, > >>>> for example, have all gone this path. > >>>> > >>>> A "current" version of MRUnit would need to compile against multiple > >>>> versions of Hadoop itself. This is not possible if it is in the same > source > >>>> tree as Hadoop. > >>>> > >>>> - Aaron > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Bernd Fondermann < > >>>> bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:10, Aaron Kimball > wrote: > >>>>>> The main reason I am interested in removing MRUnit from Hadoop is > that I > >>>>>> believe that MRUnit deserves its own release cycle. I think this is > in > >>>>> the > >>>>>> best interest of its users. > >>>>> > >>>>> Not in mine, at least. (I'm writing MR unit tests.) > >>>>> Many projects release more than one product. I'd rather get MRUnit > >>>>> from the same source where I get my MR from. > >>>>> Separate release cylcles would be ok for me, though. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps more importantly, access to new features in MRUnit should > not > >>>>>> require upgrading one's entire Hadoop deployment; this is a client > >>>>> library > >>>>>> that depends only on Hadoop's public APIs. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1. > >>>>> > >>>>>> My primary concern is to move MRUnit to a place where the community > can > >>>>>> derive the most benefit from it. The Apache Incubator could fulfill > this > >>>>>> role; given the presence of individuals willing to mentor this > project, I > >>>>>> believe this would be a successful way to release MRUnit more > quickly and > >>>>>> continue to work to grow the MRUnit community. > >>>>> > >>>>> What are your expectations what MRUnit would become, software-wise? > >>>>> Wouldn't the MRUnit community be largely the same as the Hadoop-MR > >>>>> community? > >>>>> > >>>>> Bernd > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >>> Senior Computer Scientist > >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> > >>> > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > --0016e6d7efd7bda03b049cd54466-- From general-return-3111-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 22 03:52:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11239 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2011 03:52:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2011 03:52:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 65290 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 03:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64820 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 03:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64806 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2011 03:52:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:52:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:52:49 +0000 Received: from dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (dishnailfind-dx.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.77.50]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1M3qM5A009608 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:52:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1298346744; bh=nIN+GEgiyIit31hVg3hVzFacWTRpmicpqUtVtFh324I=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cIgUfhJ/41Rl5S9Xq5hwfAT5o/VYEylx7ZhU1XrnIZC3nPcJhX4ALC+rj+BOBluqu 5do6n/4wH4bpGFXXsChxKjpXK8qJ+XVpg3jLQ5rMNChrdZwxxEJFRGqbG+VuOh+/Rk Fr+K7Q7mdAknaka1Ei2NAZ1RKY9RBaEL+6jHglEE= Message-ID: <4D6332F6.8030200@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:22:22 +0530 From: Ranjit Mathew Organization: Yahoo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: precommit testing gone crazy References: <784E9D98-E8EE-4DCC-824B-94F63B8973CE@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <784E9D98-E8EE-4DCC-824B-94F63B8973CE@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Monday 21 February 2011 11:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Apologies. Looks like the precommit testing control file got corrupted over the weekend and > most Patch Available issues got run thru Hudson again. ...and when it does run, it cannot seem to find "/usr/bin/patch": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7152 :-/ Ranjit From general-return-3112-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 22 19:19:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31400 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2011 19:19:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2011 19:19:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 26906 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 19:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26668 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 19:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26657 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2011 19:19:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:19:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.220.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:19:32 +0000 Received: by vxc41 with SMTP id 41so2303100vxc.35 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:19:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=wTfYIJc/uSFdQzYwvtiaG9O6UdkQYLc4iOmxU9QNC8U=; b=YzTX1uQEAR8ur4iEtB/qmwjYoq7ox7d5ESmcIWp1ukcFaL2mjrw5abIr5fXFd5Dtnv LfeZx+fE/37+MU6muouLc4IOQS+0uTHuZ9r8eZVWzZ3iD9kVtI9A2Y1a/CKvrz8jPQ09 NISVZ+f9xluckfJOtScs2vcDn1aTraf6Yfl9w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=dl878hF3i+dE63NrM7EbY78RGZTEiUexl1Dk0lC7Tjdk/2u1rd5bIFPIZqafKdBZjP iBiN6k0DixYJIjps+GGdLYtRm6dvLWPKkcFYDNnaquiFI+5S3YuWc3FpRC/Y4s9Kpd9N KzsnYspbemqstNsrCP5X+7GqNzdvrE7JOQI1I= Received: by 10.52.159.225 with SMTP id xf1mr4655111vdb.55.1298402351321; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:19:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.31] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm2506301vcp.38.2011.02.22.11.19.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:19:10 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Please Welcome Todd to Hadoop's PMC Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:19:09 -0500 Message-Id: <030F14BB-D7D5-4606-A570-9F3A94132C55@holsman.net> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) It gives me great pride to announce that Todd has accepted a position on = Hadoop's PMC. The Hadoop PMC is tasked with the oversight of Hadoop and its = sub-projects, as well as voting new committers. Well Done Todd! -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not = believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard From general-return-3113-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 22 19:25:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33058 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2011 19:25:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2011 19:25:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 36091 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 19:25:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36049 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2011 19:25:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36041 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2011 19:25:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:25:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:25:16 +0000 Received: by vws20 with SMTP id 20so3162880vws.35 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:24:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=jJzVHocbUECTkYxwXPvxVsO16tDAZd1R0t4l8K5a+k4=; b=g75I4CG4W4RUL1Blbbmr6tZtn5/chCZIhj7Yxy5zWVolbKUlXrGza+th2yUfuIxl8/ ihXgsVaZ+Rz1ZH/ZdOCVxRdodzUfSrAxZAPAQBqKuNzCA9JmrNX9qL1+21+E78Iu2j/K /QTeDapiK6t8LyEXLOlUK8ICn8kbn24QtzGa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PeV+cQZsw7Hv5qPsHyIgRncg0Wf5ArY8AFX5CibuADnxukJh/4ik88lTekUy9Znhd3 gcshyGVDKt8JZa3aVeshT8AFxtg+oibs1j83rL5eGIQxyvbjOeSWOGZ7B7yMfKG+53bk f7MWLZStGdxDjiyBujizqM5hnnyOrHFOfc58s= Received: by 10.52.167.164 with SMTP id zp4mr4581059vdb.305.1298402675525; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:24:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.31] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm668098vch.36.2011.02.22.11.24.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:24:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Please Welcome Todd Lipcon to Hadoop's PMC Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <030F14BB-D7D5-4606-A570-9F3A94132C55@holsman.net> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:24:33 -0500 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16A6620E-9998-4D45-A163-6E47D3C9F9CC@Holsman.net> References: <030F14BB-D7D5-4606-A570-9F3A94132C55@holsman.net> To: Ian Holsman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry for the confusion..=20 I meant Todd Lipcon. On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > It gives me great pride to announce that Todd has accepted a position = on Hadoop's PMC. >=20 > The Hadoop PMC is tasked with the oversight of Hadoop and its = sub-projects, as well as voting new committers. >=20 > Well Done Todd! >=20 > -- > Ian Holsman > Ian@Holsman.net > PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman >=20 > Never explain - your friends do not need it and your enemies will not = believe you anyway. Elbert Hubbard >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 -- Ian Holsman Ian@Holsman.net PH: +1-703 879-3128 AOLIM: ianholsman Skype:iholsman We are not afraid of the truth, in fact we plan on taking the truth out = for a nice meal while we persuade it to adopt our views From general-return-3114-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 23 05:28:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76607 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2011 05:28:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 05:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 54830 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 05:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54442 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 05:28:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54432 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2011 05:28:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:28:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:28:16 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LH200MX51TCBZ30@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:27:13 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-23_02:2011-02-23,2011-02-23,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102220212 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hdfsproxy HDFS contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:27:13 -0800 Message-id: References: <823262F0-EE37-4A0A-8F8C-D9422541D67B@mac.com> <0CBAFDBB-AC2A-495D-8936-4DF4D6731B69@Holsman.NET> <864B55E7-8A46-458F-8B16-8252A2011835@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For closure, this vote fails due to a couple binding -1 votes. Nige On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but Hadoop is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and cluster sizes. > > There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People select Hadoop because they are confident that as their business / problem grows, Hadoop can grow with it. > > --- > E14 - via iPhone > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:25 AM, "Bernd Fondermann" wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 14:58, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> Hi Bernd. >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>> >>>> We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache >>>> Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development. >>>> Instead, code is developed internally at Yahoo and then contributed in >>>> (smaller or larger) chunks to Hadoop. >>> >>> This has been the situation in the past, >>> but as you can see in the last month, this has changed. >>> >>> Yahoo! has publicly committed to move their development into the main code base, and you can see they have started doing this with the 20.100 branch, >>> and their recent commits to trunk. >>> Combine this with Nige taking on the 0.22 release branch, (and sheperding it into a stable release) and I think we have are addressing your concerns. >>> >>> They have also started bringing the discussions back on the list, see the recent discussion about Jobtracker-nextgen Arun has re-started in MAPREDUCE-279. >>> >>> I'm not saying it's perfect, but I think the major players understand there is an issue, and they are *ALL* moving in the right direction. >> >> I enthusiastically would like to see your optimism be verified. >> Maybe I'm misreading the statements issued publicly, but I don't think >> that this is fully understood. I agree though that it's a move into >> the right direction. >> >>>> This is open source development upside down. >>>> It is not ok for people to diff ASF svn against their internal code >>>> and provide the diff as a patch without reviewing IP first for every >>>> line of code changed. >>>> For larger chunks I'd suggest to even go via the Incubator IP clearance process. >>>> Only then will we force committers to primarily work here in the open >>>> and return to what I'd consider a healthy project. >>>> >>>> To be honest: Hadoop is in the process of falling apart. >>>> Contrib Code gets moved out of Apache instead of being maintained here. >>>> Discussions are seldom consense-driven. >>>> Release branches stagnate. >>> >>> True. releases do take a long time. This is mainly due to it being extremely hard to test and verify that a release is stable. >>> It's not enough to just run the thing on 4 machines, you need at least 50 to test some of the major problems. This requires some serious $ for someone to verify. >> >> It has been proposed on the list before, IIRC. Don't know how to get >> there, but the project seriously needs access to a cluster of this >> size. >> >>>> Downstream projects like HBase don't get proper support. >>>> Production setups are made from 3rd party distributions. >>>> Development is not happening here, but elsewhere behind corporate doors. >>>> Discussion about future developments are started on corporate blogs ( >>>> http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/02/mapreduce-nextgen/ >>>> ) instead of on the proper mailing list. >>>> Hurdles for committing are way too high. >>>> On the bright side, new committers and PMC members are added, this is >>>> an improvement. >>>> >>>> I'd suggest to move away from relying on large code dumps from >>>> corporations, and move back to the ASF-proven "individual committer >>>> commits on trunk"-model where more committers can get involved. >>>> If that means not to support high end cluster sizes for some months, >>>> well, so be it. >>> >>>> Average committers cannot run - e.g. test - on high >>>> end cluster sizes. If that would mean they cannot participate, then >>>> the open source project better concentrate on small and medium sized >>>> cluster instead. >>> >>> >>> Well.. that's one approach.. but there are several companies out there who rely on apache's hadoop to power their large clusters, so I'd hate to see hadoop become something that only runs well on >>> 10-nodes.. as I don't think that will help anyone either. >> >> But only looking at high-end scale doesn't help either. >> >> Lets face the fact that Hadoop is now moving from early adaptors phase >> into a much broader market. I predict that small to medium sized >> clusters will be the majority of Hadoop deployments in a few month >> time. 4000, or even 500 machines is the high-end range. If the open >> source project Hadoop cannot support those users adequately (without >> becoming defunct), the committership might be better off to focus on >> the low-end and medium sized users. >> >> I'm not suggesting to turn away from the handfull (?) of high-end >> users. They certainly have most valuable input. But also, *they* >> obviously have the resources in terms of larger clusters and >> developers to deal with their specific setups. Obviously, they don't >> need to rely on the open source project to make releases. In fact, >> they *do* work on their own Hadoop derivatives. >> All the other users, the hundreds of boring small cluster users, don't >> have that choice. They *depend* on the open source releases. >> >> Hadoop is an Apache project, to provide HDFS and MR free of charge to >> the general public. Not only to me - nor to only one or two big >> companies either. >> Focus on all the users. >> >> Bernd From general-return-3115-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 23 05:39:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91162 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2011 05:39:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 05:39:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 66796 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 05:39:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66464 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 05:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66455 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2011 05:39:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:39:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:39:10 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LH200MDT2C5GR30@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:38:30 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-23_02:2011-02-23,2011-02-23,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102220215 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <4D5E84DC.6050200@crs4.it> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:38:30 -0800 Message-id: References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> <4D5E84DC.6050200@crs4.it> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org For closure, this vote fails due to a binding -1 vote. Nige On Feb 18, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Simone Leo wrote: > I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid > Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of) > HOD since 2008 and we still use it in production. We use Hadoop 0.20.2 > since it was released one year ago. > > Simone > > On 02/12/11 06:15, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>>> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including >>>> it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. >>> >>> Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds have >>> dependencies on python. >> >> But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures >> causing the build to fail. >> >>>> b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the >>>> topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months >>>> or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib >>>> modules other than the schedulers and streaming. >>> >>> Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work >>> with 0.20 or beyond. >> >> Out of curiosity, what goes wrong? Clearly nothing major has changed in >> starting up a mapreduce cluster in a very long time. >> >>>> c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that >>>> we've ignored. >>> >>> Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. >> >> There are also some patches on core Hadoop that have been sitting for a >> long time, so I don't think that is a valid inference. >> >> I would love to hear some of the people who are using HOD speak up and >> give us their feedback. >> >> -- Owen > > > -- > Simone Leo > Data Fusion - Distributed Computing > CRS4 > POLARIS - Building #1 > Piscina Manna > I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy > e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it > http://www.crs4.it From general-return-3116-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 23 22:08:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72118 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2011 22:08:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 22:08:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 51714 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 22:08:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51505 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2011 22:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51490 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2011 22:08:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:08:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:08:16 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so627665bwz.35 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:07:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=kJq3pJdHsHXiov9x7Sr/udyzvPR76O+VmItty+PPOAU=; b=LHHdD3MLM/iitNMT/Sj+SMjMrYShcROZ7NlKduy8VmbAT7WZ9/vPuGICQ/97p6E4E7 vYJwnAnM9davKPsV2or4xw29MUzqveKlOKAq/bLXE/d2PNCmdqbiTKe80a0OGByeU6bQ /u8RT0+GSz61H53RF546twOb2c4OM6ILOMGRc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=GQ52yNCMBhEo26Uh6DrOeun2i7ri8RqZMqs+x+mP3wkwCgrrVMjrKpFjV/oUrGViEK P+QEaoWbz7wOB8XzwFzHs2qkCN5gLiPZWaQDQOcdL+8BY1VpQoQaqZdYYq5V+iabpgdX Dp951LuQrUTeyaeCetCwnWQ+Pmw1i45SLhIqU= Received: by 10.204.123.7 with SMTP id n7mr55603bkr.33.1298498868270; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:07:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.215 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:07:28 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:07:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: March 2011 San Francisco Hadoop User Meetup ("integration") To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d60cc8d799049cfa5395 --00504502d60cc8d799049cfa5395 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, I'm pleased to announce that the third SF Hadoop meetup will be held Wednesday, March 9th, from 6pm to 8pm. (We will hopefully continue using the 2nd Wednesday of the month for successive meetups). This meetup will be hosted by the good folks at Yelp. Their office is at 706 Mission St, San Francisco (3rd and Mission). We have ample space available for a large gathering of Hadoop enthusiasts. As per our emerging tradition, we will continue to use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All members of the Hadoop community are welcome to attend. While all Hadoop-related subjects are on topic, I'd like to seed this month's discussion with the theme of "integration." Yelp has asked that all attendees RSVP in advance, to comply with their security policy. Please join the meetup group and RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/events/16678757/ Refreshments will be provided. Regards, - Aaron Kimball --00504502d60cc8d799049cfa5395-- From general-return-3117-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 24 01:04:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32608 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2011 01:04:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2011 01:04:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 56360 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 01:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56259 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 01:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56251 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2011 01:04:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:04:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:04:39 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so33418iwr.35 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:04:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.31.131 with SMTP id y3mr283192ibc.179.1298509459096; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:04:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.42.201 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:03:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D5E84DC.6050200@crs4.it> References: <84B97117-5DA4-4A32-912A-8DBFCE3D063E@linkedin.com> <535D05CA-3321-48BA-82C4-C18FC8983C3A@mac.com> <4D5E84DC.6050200@crs4.it> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:03:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Abandon hod Common contrib To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Simone Leo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032557a34e0c0510049cfccbc8 --00032557a34e0c0510049cfccbc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can any committer with knowledge of HOD please review this patch? If there are no committers with such knowledge, I would encourage us to either (a) add a committer to maintain hod, or (b) reconsider the vote to abandon it as an official contrib. Perhaps Simone and Gianluigi could move it to a separate incubator project? -Todd On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Simone Leo wrote: > I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid > Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of) > HOD since 2008 and we still use it in production. We use Hadoop 0.20.2 > since it was released one year ago. > > Simone > > On 02/12/11 06:15, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >>> a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including > >>> it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size. > >> > >> Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds have > >> dependencies on python. > > > > But Allen's point is that I don't recall ever seeing HOD test failures > > causing the build to fail. > > > >>> b) The edu community uses this quite extensively, evidenced by the > >>> topic coming up on the mailing lists at least once every two months > >>> or so and has for years. Can't say that about the other contrib > >>> modules other than the schedulers and streaming. > >> > >> Then they are using old version of Hadoop. AFAICT HOD does not work > >> with 0.20 or beyond. > > > > Out of curiosity, what goes wrong? Clearly nothing major has changed in > > starting up a mapreduce cluster in a very long time. > > > >>> c) The community that does use it has even submitted a patch that > >>> we've ignored. > >> > >> Which means the committers of this project gave up on it long ago. > > > > There are also some patches on core Hadoop that have been sitting for a > > long time, so I don't think that is a valid inference. > > > > I would love to hear some of the people who are using HOD speak up and > > give us their feedback. > > > > -- Owen > > > -- > Simone Leo > Data Fusion - Distributed Computing > CRS4 > POLARIS - Building #1 > Piscina Manna > I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy > e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it > http://www.crs4.it > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00032557a34e0c0510049cfccbc8-- From general-return-3118-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 24 18:46:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81779 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2011 18:46:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2011 18:46:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 42338 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 18:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42073 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 18:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42057 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2011 18:46:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:46:03 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so681420wwi.29 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:45:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UUdzCtvlsNYiwVfsa8tMBGe9a2zfTJJEZ5JhdQpXcAw=; b=O8pok3zrfJiUuyD//XCUpW/pJJTYjuhEL1CWy9gaA7yNFuyEpyf6zu5J0TSeVfTdkp 3DLqOdvgUEjYe8eYokzhZFeGEwc3g2EjNTvqQeImeckKVoMZ6MdySuq1RIKlejqqm5+m OsIRKdb61Jfk0kXjzjPzADID1svbkA/OrJIyQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Syi6DVOPys6tkzp5Ol8qNpzWmmI93jgLqSOHNfjgayfl4fAW5ujZoqZOHRNlantjeP A4lsK+lGNeW2mfrhGE/qsPUMZEkgHcSOhU9Ib79Og76tpAmBkepb95RmEBGChmKs0qTG tqP9VbMdm7TCTo6jlQSQqtliVG0eMdZxCPDQk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr6188579wec.44.1298573142316; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:45:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:45:42 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: JAVA API to HDFS From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbdf5ddcd652049d0b9e2e --0016e6dbdf5ddcd652049d0b9e2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How to copy a file from a HDS to local file system with a JAVA API ? where i can find a documentation and example about it? thanks --0016e6dbdf5ddcd652049d0b9e2e-- From general-return-3119-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 24 18:53:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83890 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2011 18:53:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 61514 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61186 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61173 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:53:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:53:25 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so690846wwi.29 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:53:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.10.208 with SMTP id 58mr1182577wev.14.1298573583579; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:53:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:52:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:52:32 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: q9rPT9o0Y9wlJ88bthFGIvhcLLs Message-ID: Subject: Re: JAVA API to HDFS To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please send HDFS specific questions to hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:45, Alessandro Binhara wrote= : > =A0How to copy a file from a HDS to local file system with a JAVA API ? > > where i can find a documentation and example about it? > > > thanks > From general-return-3120-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 24 23:11:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74361 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2011 23:11:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2011 23:11:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 21508 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 23:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21431 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2011 23:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21423 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2011 23:11:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:11:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:11:02 +0000 Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so686433gxk.35 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:10:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=xHxuJ392Y4EVLCpi0HgGxWc1IxM9LkOgU2P1uOG00Xg=; b=rUDNPyIu8dAfPmLVTzk/XoKlhEr9xGLzEjD1wahPiEQR3vv7xIkNOBFxpayEoc/ssk n7yenbL5pGdQlz7dGsbbI7ZIvQNoNNMKc3QlqknTBLGsb0/yIYJE0GyoVuJLv1q//dej bMnH53zNqzmHXKj6uiPS082NHvUq2vybfe23Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=Dm99XL508hqriiGDid5IT6dLfqsUvQ5YR6k+TwO9ceDAqJG4U+FCAqkA4LGsyl8809 JbN8M/9xYZ+rCRlKCH+6doMssWPMr0m6iOJPKjsjWs5ZotjO2vwQ0CVNZV37DkPc7H8X bnncLAFW1P/uUitgYiFWv3Ho+xGdfXDwaCBRk= Received: by 10.150.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr2733143ybd.80.1298589025918; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.1.10] ([12.50.76.194]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v39sm101299yba.18.2011.02.24.15.10.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:10:25 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: DRAFT: Giving credit where it is due - how we would like to be acknowledged page Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:10:23 -0500 Message-Id: <869583EB-E0F5-447F-BE05-DABFBB0B3A5C@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey guys. I'd like to create a link on hadoop.apache.org which describes how we = (Apache Hadoop) would like to be recognized by the vendors & = applications that make use of our software. I'm not a wordsmith, and would naturally appreciate your feedback on=20 a) should we do this b) what it should say here is my initial stab at it. -- Apache Hadoop powers hundreds of sites, and the ecosystem of = applications and vendors that the hadoop platform supports. If you are part of that ecosystem, we don't ask for license fees or that = you give us a free lunch when we are in your neck of the woods but we would appreciate that when you do reference us, that you = reference us properly. We have a page describing our trademark policy here - = http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/, and if you are holding event = about Apache Hadoop, you might want to look at = http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/events.html. From general-return-3121-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 25 02:10:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52293 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2011 02:10:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2011 02:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 81773 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2011 02:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81573 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2011 02:10:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81565 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2011 02:10:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:10:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:10:36 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=PieEoRbkVZ73SW0gqWwfXFskCxC7h4CZPWUT2Byudy6i7dAKbkws52an cEkbb6cXUxEckb8F4nfR8iNP/j13txp27W00Z0b7ESdknvzN6WcKNstT8 cpSIkErq5YrK1Al; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1298599833; x=1330135833; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Milind=20Bhandarkar=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20DRAFT:=20Giving=20credit=20where=20it =20is=20due=20-=20how=20we=20would=20like=20to=20be=0D=0A =20acknowledged=20page|Date:=20Fri,=2025=20Feb=202011=200 2:10:15=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<33DD5698C299064193F322E0BA4E2F6F@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20<869583EB-E0F5-447F-BE05-DABFBB0B3A5 C@Holsman.NET>|References:=20<869583EB-E0F5-447F-BE05-DAB FBB0B3A5C@Holsman.NET>; bh=WNRKPU8+PmLC4upbXmF14taVq68bYPLWIdgSwYbfBmU=; b=qFVveU4G9ATgH9wP3dp43KDwj4A9QwgdVfOetL45XzCaMifaagYZ/zxl RclzPJR0pF5ddjnzFObCuWU+thxZIyW8jBpi/Bj6trpV2a57KgIX2HE5X q0t8A9ZONfgEpS6; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,221,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="20548069" Received: from ESV4-EXC02.linkedin.biz ([fe80::4d74:48bd:e0bd:13ee]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:12:00 -0800 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "" Subject: Re: DRAFT: Giving credit where it is due - how we would like to be acknowledged page Thread-Topic: DRAFT: Giving credit where it is due - how we would like to be acknowledged page Thread-Index: AQHL1Hhe9+QBqsSYpkKeZ7vyyersNpQR/3OA Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:10:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <869583EB-E0F5-447F-BE05-DABFBB0B3A5C@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: <869583EB-E0F5-447F-BE05-DABFBB0B3A5C@Holsman.NET> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <33DD5698C299064193F322E0BA4E2F6F@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hey Ian, is it okay to tweet with #hadoop hashtag or should it be #apachehadoop ? - milind On Feb 24, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > Hey guys. >=20 > I'd like to create a link on hadoop.apache.org which describes how we (Ap= ache Hadoop) would like to be recognized by the vendors & applications that= make use of our software. >=20 > I'm not a wordsmith, and would naturally appreciate your feedback on=20 > a) should we do this > b) what it should say >=20 > here is my initial stab at it. > -- >=20 > Apache Hadoop powers hundreds of sites, and the ecosystem of applications= and vendors that the hadoop platform supports. >=20 > If you are part of that ecosystem, we don't ask for license fees or that = you give us a free lunch when we are in your neck of the woods > but we would appreciate that when you do reference us, that you reference= us properly. >=20 > We have a page describing our trademark policy here - http://www.apache.o= rg/foundation/marks/, and if you are holding event about Apache Hadoop, you= might want to look at http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/events.html. >=20 >=20 --- Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com From general-return-3122-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 25 07:34:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85595 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2011 07:34:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2011 07:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8510 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2011 07:34:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7965 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2011 07:34:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7951 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2011 07:34:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:34:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:34:30 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_c+4beeT6mJ3IKNo4C1Voyw)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LH5007Q0X05R630@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:33:42 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-25_03:2011-02-25,2011-02-25,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102240204 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Precommit MapReduce testing Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:33:41 -0800 Message-id: <5232178A-5B74-4A24-A09C-FFAEF845C5A7@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_c+4beeT6mJ3IKNo4C1Voyw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I've just turned on precommit testing for MAPREDUCE. The Hadoop build slaves should work thru most of these in the next 24 hours: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/ In addition, I've hopefully fixed the issue with the precommit testing control file getting corrupted causing all the Patch Available issues to be tested again. Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_c+4beeT6mJ3IKNo4C1Voyw)-- From general-return-3123-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 26 03:56:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94421 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 03:56:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2011 03:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 65090 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 03:55:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64469 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 03:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64461 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2011 03:55:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:55:44 +0000 Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so1366329yxd.35 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.168.4 with SMTP id q4mr4323866ybe.427.1298692522153; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm868917yha.1.2011.02.25.19.55.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:55:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:55:16 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Build/test infrastructure Message-ID: <20110226035516.GA20670@tp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build machines= I thought of a way to make them: a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them in a controlled fashion. I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be defined) which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's software is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the machines or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. If there are no objections from the community I can put together some Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. --=20 Take care, Cos 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. Jean Giraudoux --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk1oeaQACgkQenyFlstYjhI43wD/RmdCV2npaSlt5lfDVFd/aejx JGNCXM02EjgYnoN3aNoA/3giugnaLx7j0CYg52nu8Qo1jNKzortCUUHsVS3iSruL =5ucp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From general-return-3124-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 26 07:49:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82275 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 07:49:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2011 07:49:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26815 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 07:49:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26325 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 07:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26317 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2011 07:49:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:49:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:49:00 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LH700LSISBKCQ80@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:47:45 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-02-26_03:2011-02-25,2011-02-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1102250246 Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <20110226035516.GA20670@tp> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:47:44 -0800 Message-id: References: <20110226035516.GA20670@tp> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directory at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) type scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the rest of the release. Nige On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build machines I > thought of a way to make them: > a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) > b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them in a > controlled fashion. > > I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be defined) > which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's software > is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the machines > or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. > > If there are no objections from the community I can put together some > Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. > > -- > Take care, > Cos > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. > Jean Giraudoux From general-return-3125-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 26 19:15:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9572 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 19:15:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2011 19:15:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 96710 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 19:15:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96597 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 19:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96589 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2011 19:15:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:15:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:14:53 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so3288030wya.35 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.1.198 with SMTP id n48mr3317025wes.59.1298747672091; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:14:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:14:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20110226035516.GA20670@tp> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:14:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YNBfnNYR9FvbULuKWanZBzd_DTs Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Nigel Daley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. > > Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directory = at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) type = scripts and files. =A0These would then get branches/tagged with the rest of= the release. That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host configurations to happen very often. Cos > Nige > > On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build machi= nes I >> thought of a way to make them: >> =A0a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >> =A0b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them i= n a >> =A0controlled fashion. >> >> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be define= d) >> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's softwa= re >> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the machi= nes >> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >> >> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some >> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >> >> -- >> Take care, >> =A0 =A0 =A0 Cos >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >> >> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jean Giraudoux > > From general-return-3126-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 26 20:44:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40271 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 20:44:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2011 20:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 86672 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 20:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86572 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 20:44:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86564 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2011 20:44:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:44:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 20:44:35 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1QKhvu1022378 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:43:57 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:43:55 -0800 Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Topic: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Index: AcvV6oZGAbCdjxR3RwWlrLjoqtP98AAC1v8N Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C98EA60BFFACeyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C98EA60BFFACeyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for build/packa= ging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due to lack of stand= ardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the community will want to= split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at some point. It may be bette= r to ensure project is modularized, and work from the same svn repository. = Maven is great for doing this, and most of the build and scripts can be de= fined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server configuration can be pass in from= hudson. We should ensure that build and deployment script do not further = couple the project. Regards, Eric On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. > > Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directory = at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) type = scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the rest of t= he release. That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host configurations to happen very often. Cos > Nige > > On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build machi= nes I >> thought of a way to make them: >> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them in = a >> controlled fashion. >> >> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be define= d) >> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's softwa= re >> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the machi= nes >> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >> >> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some >> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >> >> -- >> Take care, >> Cos >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >> >> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >> Jean Giraudoux > > --_000_C98EA60BFFACeyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3127-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 26 22:19:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72261 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 22:19:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2011 22:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 47516 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 22:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47463 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2011 22:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47455 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2011 22:19:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:19:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:19:22 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so3375546wya.35 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.201 with SMTP id j51mr3441644wej.44.1298758741056; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:19:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:18:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:18:41 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9HdhXLMp0soAsMApVoaNT1P07mo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build infrastructure. On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: > We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for build/pac= kaging. =A0The current state of hadoop is coupled together due to lack of s= tandardized RPC format. =A0Once this issue is cleared, the community will w= ant to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at some point. =A0It may = be better to ensure project is modularized, and work from the same svn repo= sitory. =A0Maven is great for doing this, and most of the build and scripts= can be defined in pom.xml. =A0Deployment/test server configuration can be = pass in from hudson. =A0We should ensure that build and deployment script d= o not further couple the project. > > Regards, > Eric > > On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: >> +1. >> >> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directory= at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) type= scripts and files. =A0These would then get branches/tagged with the rest o= f the release. > > That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host > configurations to happen very often. > > Cos > >> Nige >> >> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build mach= ines I >>> thought of a way to make them: >>> =A0a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >>> =A0b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them = in a >>> =A0controlled fashion. >>> >>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be defin= ed) >>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's softw= are >>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the mach= ines >>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >>> >>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some >>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >>> >>> -- >>> Take care, >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 Cos >>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>> >>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jean Giraudoux >> >> > > From general-return-3128-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 00:04:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5412 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 00:04:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 00:04:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 92994 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 00:04:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92794 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 00:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92786 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 00:04:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:04:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:04:16 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1R03YLr065474 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:03:34 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:03:33 -0800 Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Topic: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Index: AcvWA0CGfgEVAKH8TNSkuin505UthQADoUtj Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C98ED4D5FFB4eyangyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C98ED4D5FFB4eyangyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The proposed test automation process hasn't been thought through. Apache = Hudson has been setup to trigger patch builds, and setup pre-commit test en= vironment. Unfortunately, the current setup needs refinement with proper s= ource code setup to make the builds working again. Ideally, the test cycle= have a commit build which runs simple unit tests, and a secondary build (e= very 24 hours) to run more through tests on multiple machine setup. The te= st cluster should be cleansed after every secondary build, and ideally this= is done in a sandbox approach. However, I don't think bring in puppet env= ironment setup is making the test system reproducible. Consequently, it ma= y be better to have the cluster test setup as part of scripts in maven inte= gration test phase. This will enable any hadoop developer to setup his own= test cluster without setup puppet master. I am not fixated on build and p= ackaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and making= the system easier to reproduce. Regards, Eric On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build infrastructure. On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: > We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for build/pac= kaging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due to lack of sta= ndardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the community will want = to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at some point. It may be bet= ter to ensure project is modularized, and work from the same svn repository= . Maven is great for doing this, and most of the build and scripts can be = defined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server configuration can be pass in fr= om hudson. We should ensure that build and deployment script do not furthe= r couple the project. > > Regards, > Eric > > On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: >> +1. >> >> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directory= at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) type= scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the rest of = the release. > > That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host > configurations to happen very often. > > Cos > >> Nige >> >> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build mach= ines I >>> thought of a way to make them: >>> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >>> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them in= a >>> controlled fashion. >>> >>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be defin= ed) >>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's softw= are >>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the mach= ines >>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >>> >>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some >>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >>> >>> -- >>> Take care, >>> Cos >>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>> >>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >>> Jean Giraudoux >> >> > > --_000_C98ED4D5FFB4eyangyahooinccom_-- From general-return-3129-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 00:34:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26231 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 00:34:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 00:34:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 6560 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 00:34:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6447 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 00:34:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6439 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 00:34:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:34:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:34:41 +0000 Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so2772089iwr.35 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.178.135 with SMTP id bm7mr2876745icb.158.1298766860570; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy41sm2596588ibb.11.2011.02.26.16.34.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:34:19 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:34:15 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Message-ID: <20110227003415.GA9036@tp> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apparently you are talking about something else, but I will bite... On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:03PM, Eric Yang wrote: > The proposed test automation process hasn't been thought through. Apache > Hudson has been setup to trigger patch builds, and setup pre-commit test > environment. Unfortunately, the current setup needs refinement with prop= er > source code setup to make the builds working again. Ideally, the test cy= cle > have a commit build which runs simple unit tests, and a secondary build > (every 24 hours) to run more through tests on multiple machine setup. The > test cluster should be cleansed after every secondary build, and ideally We don't have a test cluster for Apache Hadoop validation. All I am focusing on is build and patch validation infrastructure. > this is done in a sandbox approach. However, I don't think bring in pupp= et > environment setup is making the test system reproducible. Consequently, = it If a specialized and highly scalable host configuration system such as Pupp= et doesn't guarantee configuration reproducibility then I am not sure what else will. Say, Y! uses that proprietary Igor environment exactly for these purposes but of course it is highly coupled with yinst format and can't be used anywhere else. > may be better to have the cluster test setup as part of scripts in maven > integration test phase. This will enable any hadoop developer to setup his Doing deployment from a build system is certainly possible, but is suboptim= al because it pollutes the build with HW/OS details, deployment scripts and su= ch. Besides, last time I've checked Hadoop was built by Ant. > own test cluster without setup puppet master. I am not fixated on build a= nd You don't need to setup puppet muster in order to bounce a node. Puppet wor= ks i a client-only mode just as perfect.=20 Cos > packaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and mak= ing > the system easier to reproduce. >=20 > Regards, > Eric >=20 > On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >=20 > This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging > of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build > infrastructure. >=20 > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: > > We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for > > build/packaging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due to > > lack of standardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the > > community will want to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at so= me > > point. It may be better to ensure project is modularized, and work from > > the same svn repository. Maven is great for doing this, and most of the > > build and scripts can be defined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server > > configuration can be pass in from hudson. We should ensure that build = and > > deployment script do not further couple the project. > > > > Regards, > > Eric > > > > On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> +1. > >> > >> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directo= ry at the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) ty= pe scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the rest o= f the release. > > > > That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host > > configurations to happen very often. > > > > Cos > > > >> Nige > >> > >> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> > >>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build ma= chines I > >>> thought of a way to make them: > >>> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) > >>> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them = in a > >>> controlled fashion. > >>> > >>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be def= ined) > >>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's sof= tware > >>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the ma= chines > >>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. > >>> > >>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some > >>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Take care, > >>> Cos > >>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > >>> > >>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. > >>> Jean Giraudoux > >> > >> > > > > >=20 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk1pnAcACgkQenyFlstYjhJ+swD+LEIMMXnUeJkqryj3nMPBHAbz kbHT9nYI42AZ+RNUXBMBAMwmjgKCDAQpJ+oicSfLAQNtGNI/tJl5WCgyrr5aonSq =98Qk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- From general-return-3130-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 01:39:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44763 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 01:39:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 01:39:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 28761 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 01:39:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28621 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 01:39:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28613 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 01:39:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:39:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:39:32 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p1R1cuLq083310 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:38:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:38:56 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:38:54 -0800 Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Topic: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Index: AcvWFjkKcwTDFM6BTa6TPdanYpa6FAACN6lk Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110227003415.GA9036@tp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/26/11 4:34 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > Apparently you are talking about something else, but I will bite... >=20 > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:03PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> The proposed test automation process hasn't been thought through. Apac= he >> Hudson has been setup to trigger patch builds, and setup pre-commit test >> environment. Unfortunately, the current setup needs refinement with pro= per >> source code setup to make the builds working again. Ideally, the test c= ycle >> have a commit build which runs simple unit tests, and a secondary build >> (every 24 hours) to run more through tests on multiple machine setup. T= he >> test cluster should be cleansed after every secondary build, and ideally >=20 > We don't have a test cluster for Apache Hadoop validation. All I am focus= ing > on is build and patch validation infrastructure. If the plan is using puppet agent without puppet master for configuring the system locally to test patch builds. It is probably using the wrong tool for the job. The value of puppet is to be able to configure heterogeneous services across machines in a consistent manner. Is there plan to deploy multiple services across machines? If the purpose is using puppet for config templates, ant or maven can do the job equally well. > Doing deployment from a build system is certainly possible, but is subopt= imal > because it pollutes the build with HW/OS details, deployment scripts and = such. > Besides, last time I've checked Hadoop was built by Ant. Deploy to remote machine can be as simple as scp tarball, extra, apply template, and run it. None of this requires puppet. Instead of ant + puppet combination, the patch test build structure could be simplified by using maven + shell scripts. Regards, Eric > You don't need to setup puppet muster in order to bounce a node. Puppet w= orks > i a client-only mode just as perfect. >=20 > Cos >=20 >> packaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and ma= king >> the system easier to reproduce. >>=20 >> Regards, >> Eric >>=20 >> On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>=20 >> This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging >> of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build >> infrastructure. >>=20 >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: >>> We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for >>> build/packaging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due t= o >>> lack of standardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the >>> community will want to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at so= me >>> point. It may be better to ensure project is modularized, and work fro= m >>> the same svn repository. Maven is great for doing this, and most of th= e >>> build and scripts can be defined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server >>> configuration can be pass in from hudson. We should ensure that build = and >>> deployment script do not further couple the project. >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Eric >>>=20 >>> On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> +1. >>>>=20 >>>> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a directo= ry at >>>> the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) typ= e >>>> scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the rest= of >>>> the release. >>>=20 >>> That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host >>> configurations to happen very often. >>>=20 >>> Cos >>>=20 >>>> Nige >>>>=20 >>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build >>>>> machines I >>>>> thought of a way to make them: >>>>> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >>>>> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of them = in a >>>>> controlled fashion. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be def= ined) >>>>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's sof= tware >>>>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the >>>>> machines >>>>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >>>>>=20 >>>>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together some >>>>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >>>>>=20 >>>>> -- >>>>> Take care, >>>>> Cos >>>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>>>>=20 >>>>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >>>>> Jean Giraudoux >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3131-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 03:11:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74805 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 03:11:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 03:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 60117 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 03:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59636 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 03:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59610 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 03:11:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 03:11:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.50] (HELO mail-gw0-f50.google.com) (74.125.83.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 03:11:06 +0000 Received: by gwaa20 with SMTP id a20so1976727gwa.37 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.49.14 with SMTP id w14mr5575760ybw.241.1298776244331; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l2sm1455197ybn.3.2011.02.26.19.10.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:10:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:10:38 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Message-ID: <20110227031037.GA14579@tp> References: <20110227003415.GA9036@tp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:38PM, Eric Yang wrote: > On 2/26/11 4:34 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >=20 > > Apparently you are talking about something else, but I will bite... > >=20 > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:03PM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> The proposed test automation process hasn't been thought through. Ap= ache > >> Hudson has been setup to trigger patch builds, and setup pre-commit te= st > >> environment. Unfortunately, the current setup needs refinement with p= roper > >> source code setup to make the builds working again. Ideally, the test= cycle > >> have a commit build which runs simple unit tests, and a secondary build > >> (every 24 hours) to run more through tests on multiple machine setup. = The > >> test cluster should be cleansed after every secondary build, and ideal= ly > >=20 > > We don't have a test cluster for Apache Hadoop validation. All I am foc= using > > on is build and patch validation infrastructure. >=20 > If the plan is using puppet agent without puppet master for configuring t= he > system locally to test patch builds. It is probably using the wrong tool > for the job. The value of puppet is to be able to configure heterogeneous > services across machines in a consistent manner. Is there plan to deploy This is simply not the only value of the tool. It allows to maintain OS configurations and system packages installation as easy for 1 host as for 1= 000 of them. Here's one of a many examples http://hstack.org/hstack-automated-deployment-using-puppet/ BTW, Puppet and Chef recipes are very widely used by all sorts of Ops and cluster management companies. Perhaps, Maven and shell too - I'm not in a position to make a judgement call. I'll let Y! Grid Ops to comment on it - they know everything about sizable clusters configuration management and to= ols for the job. > multiple services across machines? If the purpose is using puppet for > config templates, ant or maven can do the job equally well. Are you suggesting that it is easier to install patch and gcc packages of version X.X.Z from a Maven build than from Puppet or Chef? If so - please c= ut such a patch for the community to review. That'd be great a great contribution! Furthermore, my Puppet knowledge is very limited and I am for sure no expert in maven. I have some concern however: - how to provide privileged access - how and where to store host configurations (i.e. packages names, versio= ns, which are gonna be different for difference OSes) - how to do native packages (see above example) and native dependency management from maven? With shell scripting? - how to maintain such a construct? I can continue for a long time, but I'd rather want to solve an issue of managing build host configurations/package sets in a most efficient and sustainable manner. In a properly designed CI system build shouldn't be responsible to configure its operation environment. It might and should check if everything is in pl= ace (and crash/report accordingly). But if my Ant script goes around to downloa= d, install and god forbids compiles some chunks of my OS I soon will end up wi= th an elegance of Python or some such. > > Doing deployment from a build system is certainly possible, but is subo= ptimal > > because it pollutes the build with HW/OS details, deployment scripts an= d such. > > Besides, last time I've checked Hadoop was built by Ant. >=20 > Deploy to remote machine can be as simple as scp tarball, extra, apply > template, and run it. None of this requires puppet. Instead of ant + > puppet combination, the patch test build structure could be simplified by > using maven + shell scripts. Sorry, but Maven + shell script can be called simplification only in a pipe dream ;) Maven is a build tool. A relatively good one perhaps, but just a build tool. Certainly everything can be done with a combination of a shell scripting + tar balls and a little SSH sugar topping. But I'd rather use a accurately designed and supported tool (Puppet, Chef, etc.). And BTW - Hadoop builds aren't maven'ized yet. Which renders most of the argument a time waste until that problem is solved. At any rate, HADOOP-7157 is the JIRA for this. Please comment on it. Cos > Regards, > Eric >=20 > > You don't need to setup puppet muster in order to bounce a node. Puppet= works > > i a client-only mode just as perfect. > >=20 > > Cos > >=20 >=20 > >> packaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and = making > >> the system easier to reproduce. > >>=20 > >> Regards, > >> Eric > >>=20 > >> On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >>=20 > >> This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging > >> of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build > >> infrastructure. > >>=20 > >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: > >>> We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for > >>> build/packaging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due= to > >>> lack of standardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the > >>> community will want to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at = some > >>> point. It may be better to ensure project is modularized, and work f= rom > >>> the same svn repository. Maven is great for doing this, and most of = the > >>> build and scripts can be defined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server > >>> configuration can be pass in from hudson. We should ensure that buil= d and > >>> deployment script do not further couple the project. > >>>=20 > >>> Regards, > >>> Eric > >>>=20 > >>> On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >>>=20 > >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>> +1. > >>>>=20 > >>>> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a direc= tory at > >>>> the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) t= ype > >>>> scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the re= st of > >>>> the release. > >>>=20 > >>> That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host > >>> configurations to happen very often. > >>>=20 > >>> Cos > >>>=20 > >>>> Nige > >>>>=20 > >>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >>>>=20 > >>>>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build > >>>>> machines I > >>>>> thought of a way to make them: > >>>>> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) > >>>>> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of the= m in a > >>>>> controlled fashion. > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be d= efined) > >>>>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's s= oftware > >>>>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the > >>>>> machines > >>>>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together so= me > >>>>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Take care, > >>>>> Cos > >>>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. > >>>>> Jean Giraudoux > >>>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>=20 >=20 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk1pwK0ACgkQenyFlstYjhKMnQD+N4hf5dJa6w7JXCJ8q3tlyKwP 8j9e6KA/M8iJl/fjpO0A/02Wqzhus5AnuJcSBFHrJIvtRXTA3xnIZOSpjhntMX6B =J3Z7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- From general-return-3132-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 09:33:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97842 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 09:33:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 09:33:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 77839 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 09:33:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77388 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 09:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77379 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 09:33:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:33:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:32:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p1R9WTIe066202 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:32:29 -0800 From: Eric Yang To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:32:27 -0800 Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Topic: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Index: AcvWLAx3/tgbNc9tRtGERFXjPYvM+AANTKx5 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110227031037.GA14579@tp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 2/26/11 7:10 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:38PM, Eric Yang wrote: >=20 > Furthermore, my Puppet knowledge is very limited and I am for sure no exp= ert > in maven. I have some concern however: > - how to provide privileged access > - how and where to store host configurations (i.e. packages names, vers= ions, > which are gonna be different for difference OSes) > - how to do native packages (see above example) and native dependency > management from maven? With shell scripting? > - how to maintain such a construct? > I can continue for a long time, but I'd rather want to solve an issue of > managing build host configurations/package sets in a most efficient and > sustainable manner. Hudson already supports chroot jail environment. It is easy to setup privileged access in the jailed environment by giving the hudson running user sudo access to the jailed environment. The host configuration can be mirrored into chroot environment with minimum set of shell commands. > Sorry, but Maven + shell script can be called simplification only in a pi= pe > dream ;) Maven is a build tool. A relatively good one perhaps, but just a > build tool. Certainly everything can be done with a combination of a shel= l > scripting + tar balls and a little SSH sugar topping. But I'd rather use = a > accurately designed and supported tool (Puppet, Chef, etc.). Maven supports various kind of remote deployment plugin. Exec plugin with shell script is the easiest one to implement. There are also plugin like cargo for more complex container deployment. There is a plan to write a deployment framework for hadoop for large scale deployment. This project i= s in planning stage. The scope is deploying the entire hadoop stack (hdfs, mr, zookeeper, hbase, pig, hive, and chukwa) to multiple large clusters. Similar to what you are planning except at the scale that it would make sense to use puppet+mcollective. We had done the evaluation, and found per puppet master would not scale well after 1800 nodes, and multilayer puppeteer spamming tree to cover all our nodes, is not ideal. We choose to use chef-solo for edge deployment. The rest of the details are to be worke= d out. This is the reason that I am interested on the test environment that is being planned here. It will be possible to use "to be invented" framework in the hudson. This system is not going to be grown in ant/maven build script, hence it will be better to keep build system simple for now. Regards, Eric >=20 > And BTW - Hadoop builds aren't maven'ized yet. Which renders most of the > argument a time waste until that problem is solved. >=20 > At any rate, HADOOP-7157 is the JIRA for this. Please comment on it. >=20 > Cos >=20 >> Regards, >> Eric >>=20 >>> You don't need to setup puppet muster in order to bounce a node. Puppet >>> works >>> i a client-only mode just as perfect. >>>=20 >>> Cos >>>=20 >>=20 >>>> packaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and >>>> making >>>> the system easier to reproduce. >>>>=20 >>>> Regards, >>>> Eric >>>>=20 >>>> On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging >>>> of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build >>>> infrastructure. >>>>=20 >>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: >>>>> We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for >>>>> build/packaging. The current state of hadoop is coupled together due= to >>>>> lack of standardized RPC format. Once this issue is cleared, the >>>>> community will want to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at = some >>>>> point. It may be better to ensure project is modularized, and work f= rom >>>>> the same svn repository. Maven is great for doing this, and most of = the >>>>> build and scripts can be defined in pom.xml. Deployment/test server >>>>> configuration can be pass in from hudson. We should ensure that buil= d and >>>>> deployment script do not further couple the project. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Eric >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>> +1. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a direc= tory >>>>>> at >>>>>> the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) t= ype >>>>>> scripts and files. These would then get branches/tagged with the re= st of >>>>>> the release. >>>>>=20 >>>>> That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host >>>>> configurations to happen very often. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Cos >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Nige >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build >>>>>>> machines I >>>>>>> thought of a way to make them: >>>>>>> a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >>>>>>> b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of the= m in >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> controlled fashion. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be >>>>>>> defined) >>>>>>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's >>>>>>> software >>>>>>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the >>>>>>> machines >>>>>>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together so= me >>>>>>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>> Cos >>>>>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >>>>>>> Jean Giraudoux >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-3133-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 27 19:37:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31503 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2011 19:37:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 19:37:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 54623 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 19:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54491 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2011 19:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54483 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2011 19:37:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:37:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:37:37 +0000 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so3726798wwi.29 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:37:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr1553367wec.44.1298835435096; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:37:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:36:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20110227031037.GA14579@tp> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:36:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WgtLDL3rRhsBf2BRBVQKDCxndPM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And now jailed environments with Hudson - oh yes, lovely yinst all over aga= in. Eric, the glorious plans about a framework to deploy thousand of nodes by the click of a button are awesome indeed. But you apparently ignoring the point: - this is about synchronization of 10 build machines at the level of system packaging and operating system configuration. With warmest regards, Cos On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:32, Eric Yang wrote: > On 2/26/11 7:10 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:38PM, Eric Yang wrote: >> >> Furthermore, my Puppet knowledge is very limited and I am for sure no ex= pert >> in maven. I have some concern however: >> =A0 - how to provide privileged access >> =A0 - how and where to store host configurations (i.e. packages names, v= ersions, >> =A0 =A0 which are gonna be different for difference OSes) >> =A0 - how to do native packages (see above example) and native dependenc= y >> =A0 =A0 management from maven? With shell scripting? >> =A0 - how to maintain such a construct? >> I can continue for a long time, but I'd rather want to solve an issue of >> managing build host configurations/package sets in a most efficient and >> sustainable manner. > > Hudson already supports chroot jail environment. =A0It is easy to setup > privileged access in the jailed environment by giving the hudson running > user sudo access to the jailed environment. =A0The host configuration can= be > mirrored into chroot environment with minimum set of shell commands..? > >> Sorry, but Maven + shell script can be called simplification only in a p= ipe >> dream ;) Maven is a build tool. A relatively good one perhaps, but just = a >> build tool. Certainly everything can be done with a combination of a she= ll >> scripting + tar balls and a little SSH sugar topping. But I'd rather use= a >> accurately designed and supported tool (Puppet, Chef, etc.). > > Maven supports various kind of remote deployment plugin. =A0Exec plugin w= ith > shell script is the easiest one to implement. =A0There are also plugin li= ke > cargo for more complex container deployment. =A0There is a plan to write = a > deployment framework for hadoop for large scale deployment. =A0This proje= ct is > in planning stage. =A0The scope is deploying the entire hadoop stack (hdf= s, > mr, zookeeper, hbase, pig, hive, and chukwa) to multiple large clusters. > Similar to what you are planning except at the scale that it would make > sense to use puppet+mcollective. =A0We had done the evaluation, and found= per > puppet master would not scale well after 1800 nodes, and multilayer > puppeteer spamming tree to cover all our nodes, is not ideal. =A0We choos= e to > use chef-solo for edge deployment. =A0The rest of the details are to be w= orked > out. =A0This is the reason that I am interested on the test environment t= hat > is being planned here. =A0It will be possible to use "to be invented" > framework in the hudson. =A0This system is not going to be grown in ant/m= aven > build script, hence it will be better to keep build system simple for now= . > > Regards, > Eric > >> >> And BTW - Hadoop builds aren't maven'ized yet. Which renders most of the >> argument a time waste until that problem is solved. >> >> At any rate, HADOOP-7157 is the JIRA for this. Please comment on it. >> >> Cos >> >>> Regards, >>> Eric >>> >>>> You don't need to setup puppet muster in order to bounce a node. Puppe= t >>>> works >>>> i a client-only mode just as perfect. >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>> >>>>> packaging only, but express my opinions on improving build system and >>>>> making >>>>> the system easier to reproduce. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> On 2/26/11 2:18 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This discussion isn't about build of the product nor about packaging >>>>> of it. We are discussing patch validation and snapshot build >>>>> infrastructure. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43, Eric Yang wrote: >>>>>> We should be very careful about the approach that we chosen for >>>>>> build/packaging. =A0The current state of hadoop is coupled together = due to >>>>>> lack of standardized RPC format. =A0Once this issue is cleared, the >>>>>> community will want to split hdfs and m/r into separated projects at= some >>>>>> point. =A0It may be better to ensure project is modularized, and wor= k from >>>>>> the same svn repository. =A0Maven is great for doing this, and most = of the >>>>>> build and scripts can be defined in pom.xml. =A0Deployment/test serv= er >>>>>> configuration can be pass in from hudson. =A0We should ensure that b= uild and >>>>>> deployment script do not further couple the project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Eric >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/26/11 11:14 AM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 23:47, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>> +1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once HADOOP-7106 is committed, I'd like to propose we create a dire= ctory >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> the same level of common/hdfs/mapreduce to hold build (and deploy) = type >>>>>>> scripts and files. =A0These would then get branches/tagged with the= rest of >>>>>>> the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> That makes sense, although I don't see changes of the host >>>>>> configurations to happen very often. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cos >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking at re-occurring build/test-patch problems on hadoop? build >>>>>>>> machines I >>>>>>>> thought of a way to make them: >>>>>>>> =A0a) all the same (configuration, installed software wise) >>>>>>>> =A0b) have an effortless system to run upgrades/updates on all of = them in >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> =A0controlled fashion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would suggest to create Puppet configs (the exact content to be >>>>>>>> defined) >>>>>>>> which we'll be checked in SCM (e.g. SVN), Whenever a build host's >>>>>>>> software >>>>>>>> is needed to be restored/updated a simple run of Puppet across the >>>>>>>> machines >>>>>>>> or change in config and run of Puppet will do the magic for us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If there are no objections from the community I can put together s= ome >>>>>>>> Puppet recipes which might be evolved as we go. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 Cos >>>>>>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 =A06115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After all, it is only the mediocre who are always at their best. >>>>>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jean Giraudoux >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> > > From general-return-3134-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 28 20:07:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1506 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 20:07:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 20:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 227 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 134 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:07:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94048 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2011 20:03:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1298923396; bh=sgta2AOzP/Q0BRWcr+Mwlt8n8UhJoFBI5uFmVBe+vkM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aK1qf2gsq79wN9bQORShfm33LsRogAJ15QP0qccVoqVTuXs0w/CokewAxinWOzpunH2J8/v1xjiX8Q69bw+28trBSYWYJDKmCSNM31CxO+1mpnrUGZ75v5Q4pzl7eIQXH255RjW2WlQ3xh5XXmRF9mNlcRT1EYnarODyuKxC0jk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Da9jxxhDIag8OM7f/wezgDDQf801FLpdCmZTqR41PhuqfAhaAbAwQBYWTmYMuaXrCnPJlJqNB++zep1wpNrtJmftXfmkcPRZlDEpIYN5G3NSMZB9yS0y7WBhxgxCt6L/C4S39OH8UKXbpEe0Nb49bKX2IJW45/NWsWpMgnJTGg4=; Message-ID: <912233.26325.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 61kC8UYVM1lzfkI7wNCdOcCC5fEIUsjuNHRasuQ0m7LvU2E ezQaD4ssLGQxTjJyRUXz7_jx.VWJ6bdFfrCWLgITyDkGuF.NCvizsIWRgL5M nfAg3YmnGDA.qnawaaqq0RJjRdmyp_tJgxJ8k9aSCkJO.KuybfunPD2Eu6xu JY_JkSlx80nqaiJRXJKu3YkdOIBVG9wDVy70K_NXqcc2WHtGeMD6FgNqMfkI baJ4N5XSOrhXSnZ4f.vaHKjXalP7W5ydN9zCj7lFOhih8NSC7ks2LI1IpMn8 AnKw3lNwSrKcpmfck_R7J7.I_ADLWTlzYTLABgJ4SXR_KRQEKGg-- X-RocketYMMF: rajive_c X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:03:16 -0800 (PST) From: Rajiv Chittajallu Reply-To: rajive@yahoo-inc.com Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > And now jailed environments with > Hudson - oh yes, lovely yinst all over again. >From where did the 'yinst' come in to this discussion? Since you know something about a company's internal tools, don't assume every one posting from that company is talking about it. From general-return-3135-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 28 20:22:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5362 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 20:22:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 20:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19524 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19479 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19471 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2011 20:22:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:22:06 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so5100447wya.35 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:21:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.51.135 with SMTP id b7mr2706266wec.29.1298924505158; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:21:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.180.70 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <912233.26325.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <912233.26325.qm@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:21:25 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DJN9nTxmEQO1JiA0_dQz7QEoSoA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:03, Rajiv Chittajallu wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/27/11, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> And now jailed environments with >> Hudson - oh yes, lovely yinst all over again. > > From where did the 'yinst' come in to this discussion? Since you know something about a company's > internal tools, don't assume every one posting from that company is talking about it. True, it doesn't imply. It was my assumption based on chrooting/jailing suggestion above. Of course, it doesn't means yinst or anything related to it. Sorry if I have offended anyone by this reference. Cos From general-return-3136-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 28 20:49:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11364 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 20:49:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2011 20:49:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 63548 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:49:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63423 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2011 20:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63415 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2011 20:48:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:48:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:48:54 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=iQGANoB4OAOnLFhZbugvJfVmiiqWPF8IunHxyx5NT8PaNYVLCIy42Reu dicJQ5U9DUYy6+SjyPWeW1bai/XKyWfdiGZ4ArnWtD6koYG60gUaoO3eK ghjNaQbAt2zHHSF; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1298926129; x=1330462129; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Build/test=20infrastructure|Date:=20Mon ,=2028=20Feb=202011=2020:50:22=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20<20110227031037.GA14579@tp> |References:=20<20110227003415.GA9036@tp>=20=0D=0A=20<20110227031037.GA14579@tp >; bh=prQ5DagKOTm9zZS4vcN89KbiymFkMAlDT9BjfjMJd1M=; b=crHL9NIrTAY97ZVhHEO0AL68EcepIuj4AduMMvjmSUjhTpG9ZL7N3IVH 1teoNXlND0ejzvegOneKd6sFHOY8k4M6qwxBUnkl+FUVk+sTQj5s39Xf7 GJ1YMAmbqDiwoWT; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,242,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="21188402" Received: from ESV4-EXC03.linkedin.biz ([fe80::985a:a6b4:f1e1:23b0]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:50:23 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Topic: Build/test infrastructure Thread-Index: AQHL1WlWfNl4aje6tUuwduC5YcQrXpQT7jEAgAC/zACAABkRgIAAGnqAgAAdTYCAAAiTgIAAEhAAgAAZogCAArnnAA== Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:50:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20110227003415.GA9036@tp> <20110227031037.GA14579@tp> In-Reply-To: <20110227031037.GA14579@tp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On Feb 26, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > BTW, Puppet and Chef recipes are very widely used by all sorts of Ops and > cluster management companies. Perhaps, Maven and shell too - I'm not in a > position to make a judgement call. I'll let Y! Grid Ops to comment on it = - > they know everything about sizable clusters configuration management and = tools > for the job. I'm not in Y! Grid Ops, but from where I sit, it sounds like you are solvi= ng the wrong problem. Getting the build machines to be the same should mostly be a one-time issu= e. If non-ops-types are messing with the package load, then that's a privi= lege and process problem not an automation problem. The success of a conf= iguration management utility is directly correlated to the amount of work t= hat people are willing to put into using them. From general-return-135-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 02 18:19:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7158 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2009 18:19:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2009 18:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 52043 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 18:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52008 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 18:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51997 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2009 18:19:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:19:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.80] (HELO QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:19:35 +0000 Received: from OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NGcA1b0040cQ2SLA8JKFSg; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:19:15 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NJK61b00S2SbwD58WJK8fD; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:19:13 +0000 Message-Id: <8E7E08E2-2976-4322-BEB7-DDB415788DE0@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [RESULT] Chukwa as subproject Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:19:05 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org With 6 +1's from the PMC and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll create the mailing lists and Jira and schedule the subversion move. -- Owen From general-return-136-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 02 20:58:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79173 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2009 20:58:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2009 20:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 56529 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 20:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56485 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 20:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56464 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2009 20:58:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:58:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of work.aviad@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.179] (HELO mail-bw0-f179.google.com) (209.85.218.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:58:01 +0000 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so2319245bwz.29 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:57:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=SzD/OkyYkdlRA3qfhTPaRhMvEayhH3sJFIxMp0GJTqs=; b=ao++AG0AT0AIx4uNdXmPIhKkIuFyCzib3sr1vBgICinr/lMushvVhDQ3URQdC/Nmca dWsXM4iQ6eJ+BEv+yV+C4XOOnjVAABystKd4LsOgJS4uL8F0SWEFX5Acr6SBI1RNyZTh 0UDwQSbOw2ktcM+IZ4PtrINpPk2EIcUeyeCj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=M1QxT7u/Unp+q3l6Xo37jXiyaZ/rRREhGWAKqc/NyBycSOtQK9kRXCHl/RZ7M+u3qa jmOfV0ikmxRrA5RxKaT/FYKP4hI3bqJVvOLc3p4g/H7xyJjjzGHv22f8gL+U084XsEwj 49h7s1YieY86ihV5oiwLQ45IGytnBBTdQUrVs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: work.aviad@gmail.com Received: by 10.181.226.3 with SMTP id d3mr2257346bkr.12.1236027460165; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:57:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6a3f6a4b0902250227m10d46683m62f5ed7737ca5f5d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:57:40 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 24c4ac5b828dabeb Message-ID: <6a3f6a4b0903021257r6ec74f54n34b3f287059f8ff3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.19.1 available From: Aviad sela To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a3dbb21f08046429112e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5a3dbb21f08046429112e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nigel Thanks, I have extracted the new project. However, I am having problems building the project I am using Eclipse 3.4 and ant 1.7 I recieve error compiling core classes * compile-core-classes*: BUILD FAILED * D:\Work\AviadWork\workspace\cur\WSAD\Hadoop_Core_19_1\Hadoop\build.xml:302: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError * it points to the the webxml tag On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Sorry for delay. Should now be fixed. Please confirm. > > Thx, > Nige > > > On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Aviad sela wrote: > > Nigel, >> The SVN tag http://svn.apach.org/repos/asf/core/tags/release-0.19.1 include >> also the branch folder branch-0.19 >> which results with double size project which is not necessary. >> >> I need to use this release to apply patch HADOOP-4546 ( >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel >> ) >> I don't know how the above branch folder should contribute when building >> the >> new eclipse project. >> >> Isn't it going to be correct to remove this branch folder from the release >> tag ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Nigel Daley >> wrote: >> >> Release 0.19.1 fixes many critical bugs in 0.19.0, including ***some data >>> loss issues***. The release also introduces an ***incompatible change*** >>> by >>> disabling the file append API (HADOOP-5224) until it can be stabilized. >>> >>> For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: >>> http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html >>> >>> Hadoop 0.19.1 Release Notes are at >>> http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.19.1/releasenotes.html >>> >>> Thanks to all who contributed to this release! >>> >>> Nigel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > --001636c5a3dbb21f08046429112e-- From general-return-137-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 12 21:36:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30404 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2009 21:36:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2009 21:36:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 43566 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2009 21:35:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43429 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2009 21:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42989 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2009 21:35:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:35:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:35:45 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n2CLYqM9061348; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=xx9jIAJEiorv7TJbtC5/W5UWuhGqs+n59JkzD5mu3EAex75XZ0l3ofCOsOxyuugh Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:34:52 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9A35A.4226627E" Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 3/18 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:33:59 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 3/18 Thread-Index: AcmNW1p3QQcXNKUgTi6+Qtm5ky8HQAV/ghoA References: From: "Ajay Anand" To: "Ajay Anand" , "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2009 21:34:52.0611 (UTC) FILETIME=[60F96130:01C9A35A] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9A35A.4226627E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 18th at Yahoo! 2811 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 2, Training Rooms 5 & 6 from 6:00-7:30 pm. =20 Agenda: "Performance Enhancement Techniques with Hadoop - a Case Study" - Milind Bhandarkar "RPMs for Hadoop Deployment and Configuration Management" - Matt Massie, Christophe Bisciglia Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2112338/ =20 Look forward to seeing you there. Ajay =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9A35A.4226627E-- From general-return-138-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 12 22:09:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49176 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2009 22:09:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2009 22:09:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 97425 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2009 22:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97400 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2009 22:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97389 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2009 22:09:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:09:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [153.2.232.100] (HELO ups.com) (153.2.232.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:09:27 +0000 Received: from ([153.2.23.181]) by magma11.ups.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503512.60781333; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:46 -0400 Received: from njrarsvr3bee.us.ups.com ([153.2.23.199]) by njrarsvr3ab2.us.ups.com ([153.2.23.181]) with mapi; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:46 -0400 From: To: Importance: high Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:44 -0400 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 3/18 Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 3/18 Thread-Index: AcmNW1p3QQcXNKUgTi6+Qtm5ky8HQAV/ghoAAAFg6FA= Message-ID: <15473C93FCCAB44A8B221DDD97CBC69734AFF072@njrarsvr3bee.us.ups.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ajay, I would love to attend - however, I'm way over on the east coast - NJ to be= specific! Do you think that I can get a copy of presentation? Thanks, John John Livingstone Enterprise Architecture, United Parcel Service R-03A-176, Mahwah, New Jersey * Tel 201.828.7584 * jlivingstone@ups.com -----Original Message----- From: Ajay Anand [mailto:aanand@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:34 PM To: Ajay Anand; core-user@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org; zoo= keeper-user@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; pig-user@hadoo= p.apache.org Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 3/18 The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Mar= ch 18th at Yahoo! 2811 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 2, Train= ing Rooms 5 & 6 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Agenda: "Performance Enhancement Techniques with Hadoop - a Case Study" - Milind Bh= andarkar "RPMs for Hadoop Deployment and Configuration Management" - Matt M= assie, Christophe Bisciglia Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2112338/ Look forward to seeing you there. Ajay From general-return-139-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 15 14:41:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78225 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2009 14:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 71775 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71752 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45521 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2009 13:59:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andy2005cst@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/SJGRwVtRc1NERwNvdlKJyvX2Fc2iQNrxrz49luJa0w=; b=IVigPEP3aZ25uStz0Bjl1nHk8WnV7a2/Y59RBE1QGX1XGAZJUVURZUJuo41EbU/jOb C5sS4rpj5N88hK8l8a6ZCxSyiOWTTQVSjQZSpS1BmULAayzL6ECa6zdDzcp3vHqSVb/5 pkhg0sRzwIcLlV4LLxrU7fJChESKf+O7Pa3T4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=o0CcyWiK2ZV0UxOUzaCOA3PhCjqjqyhjyR7d2n63Kqp1pc5QUA5WKkrjWNVyGe2ZvJ 2XMrT6kKjNaoJcIKykADeegei5VgauCZcR3KYjhJdf47wG9VoBUyWx3bxld66ZVQAVKZ OwjFrH3N2fw13SJE3PVFKo6AiGTmRXItV/7jA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:58:32 +0800 Message-ID: <17e74dd00903150658n4881efe7p209948cf60a9de49@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. From: Xudong Du To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e90dcbb8191f046528baf6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e90dcbb8191f046528baf6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, everyone. I met a strange problem and I am looking forward to your help. I setup a 2 nodes cluster hadoop on 2 mechine runing ubuntu. and 1 is both master and slave and the other one is slave, and it seems to be functional. but yesterday, it does not work anymore. when I type hadoop command such as "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", it shows that "Bad connection to FS. command aborted." so, I run "bin/start-all.sh" to see if the dfs is shut, however it shows that: (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for the other one's ip address) starting namenode, logging to ***** ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 14800. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 9113. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: starting secondarynamenode, logging to *** jobtracker running as process 14946. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: tasktracker running as process 15029. Stop it first. ###.###.###.###: tasktracker running as process 9217. Stop it first. and i type "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", but again: Bad connection to FS. command aborted. then when I type "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", it shows: (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for the other one's ip address) stopping jobtracker ***.***.***.***: stopping tasktracker ###.###.###: stopping tasktracker no namenode to stop <--------this is very strange ***.***.***.***: stopping datanode ###.###.###: stopping datanode ***.***.***.***: no secondarynamenode to stop when i restart it by "bin/start-all.sh", it still does not work.. can anyone give me some idea? Thanks a lot. -- Yours Sincerely Xudong Du Zijing 2# 305A Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 --001636e90dcbb8191f046528baf6-- From general-return-140-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 15 14:41:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78405 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2009 14:41:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 72439 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72421 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2009 14:41:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46528 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2009 14:04:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andy2005cst@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RYToJBi0fCUGv/v/OwaDSPfRKP4vkhYSR7Jy3yBr2ko=; b=BcPzHcKdp8WF50jEa8Rori2ce3vKnXkoxs332n5bj0/WY4tpfHSJPNLCyXdWn9E3+e E9kDumjerqIUJjJdDha64urqkZ1AOLdRzj9pU2fiWb+NPxLZ2R+K9hs1gS2pvM4jdRZJ hvhrtQ6+naxGLNJrY5Mslg2O/JTw2doyM7PdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IhsqxX045WF2JCJE3a4CGYqdRtYT/JNWUgBlYnXmMEi0O4DY0J62lxCJolURam7d0o xBN4DMewyC+VopGVKIwNIzq8EA+n70KVLD3JovDGh6ddmqweIBoPpgAE/4Zo4BmlboSX wrIQnxB9096WJNKVU/NDbKarf96xjqpywra94= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <17e74dd00903150658n4881efe7p209948cf60a9de49@mail.gmail.com> References: <17e74dd00903150658n4881efe7p209948cf60a9de49@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:03:54 +0800 Message-ID: <17e74dd00903150703k7b19d9edg1b74030ab1cf4405@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. From: Xudong Du To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd23e7ceaf9a7046528cdc9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd23e7ceaf9a7046528cdc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit just now, I miswrite a command in the email, it is highlighted in red now. Sorry. waiting for your help. thanks a lot. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Xudong Du Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM Subject: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Hello, everyone. I met a strange problem and I am looking forward to your help. I setup a 2 nodes cluster hadoop on 2 mechine runing ubuntu. and 1 is both master and slave and the other one is slave, and it seems to be functional. but yesterday, it does not work anymore. when I type hadoop command such as "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", it shows that "Bad connection to FS. command aborted." so, I run "bin/start-all.sh" to see if the dfs is shut, however it shows that: (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for the other one's ip address) starting namenode, logging to ***** ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 14800. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 9113. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: starting secondarynamenode, logging to *** jobtracker running as process 14946. Stop it first. ***.***.***.***: tasktracker running as process 15029. Stop it first. ###.###.###.###: tasktracker running as process 9217. Stop it first. and i type "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", but again: Bad connection to FS. command aborted. then when I type "bin/stop-all.sh(sorry, I mis-write just now )", it shows: (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for the other one's ip address) stopping jobtracker ***.***.***.***: stopping tasktracker ###.###.###: stopping tasktracker no namenode to stop <--------this is very strange ***.***.***.***: stopping datanode ###.###.###: stopping datanode ***.***.***.***: no secondarynamenode to stop when i restart it by "bin/start-all.sh", it still does not work.. can anyone give me some idea? Thanks a lot. -- Yours Sincerely Xudong Du Zijing 2# 305A Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 -- Yours Sincerely Xudong Du Zijing 2# 305A Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 --000e0cd23e7ceaf9a7046528cdc9-- From general-return-141-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 20 17:20:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38029 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2009 17:20:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2009 17:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 44779 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 17:20:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44762 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 17:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44745 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2009 17:20:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:20:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [132.239.1.207] (HELO outbound3.ucsd.edu) (132.239.1.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:19:57 +0000 Received: from iport-c1.ucsd.edu (iport-c1.ucsd.edu [132.239.0.180]) by outbound3.ucsd.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n2KHJZjj006996 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=2007001; d=ucsd.edu; c=simple; q=dns; b=l9jfJYFNSpdkW0vKEJXH7FhbRD2geFRBXDtHcZ15ppAnUQWxGiuDUUmfc0mdQxMQN Lqlqqh6K6NwvzX8/SrQ5w== X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAFttw0mE7wEx/2dsb2JhbACBUMQ/DYYwiE2DfQZh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,396,1233561600"; d="scan'208";a="35499609" X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp.ucsd.edu ([132.239.1.49]) by iport-c1-out.ucsd.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Mar 2009 10:19:35 -0700 Received: from mouse.localnet (mouse.ucsd.edu [132.239.186.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.ucsd.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n2KHJYTp019341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:19:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: smtp.ucsd.edu: Host mouse.ucsd.edu [132.239.186.22] claimed to be mouse.localnet From: Terrence Martin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Java exception when starting the namenode Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:19:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903201019.29128.tmartin@physics.ucsd.edu> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No I am seeing the following exception when I attempt to start my Hadoop namenode. This is a namenode that was working and the system had a few TB of files in it. Yesterday we were attempting to upgrade it to a more recent version and things appeared to be working. 2009-03-20 10:14:02,667 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = proxy-1.t2.ucsd.edu/169.228.130.63 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.19.2-dev STARTUP_MSG: build = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/tags/release-0.19.1 -r 748415; compiled by 'sl1-user' on Tue Mar 17 10:49:06 CDT 2009 ************************************************************/ 2009-03-20 10:14:02,772 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=NameNode, port=9000 2009-03-20 10:14:02,776 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: proxy-1.t2.ucsd.edu/169.228.130.63:9000 2009-03-20 10:14:02,778 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=NameNode, sessionId=Hadoop 2009-03-20 10:14:02,783 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2009-03-20 10:14:02,832 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel 2009-03-20 10:14:02,832 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup 2009-03-20 10:14:02,832 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true 2009-03-20 10:14:02,839 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2009-03-20 10:14:02,840 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2009-03-20 10:14:02,866 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files = 1435 2009-03-20 10:14:03,061 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Number of files under construction = 3 2009-03-20 10:14:03,065 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Image file of size 361956 loaded in 0 seconds. 2009-03-20 10:14:03,074 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addChild(FSDirectory.java:1006) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.addNode(FSDirectory.java:982) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.unprotectedAddFile(FSDirectory.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.java:613) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSEdits(FSImage.java:973) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.loadFSImage(FSImage.java:793) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage.java:352) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem.java:309) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:288) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:163) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:208) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:194) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:859) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:868) 2009-03-20 10:14:03,075 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at proxy-1.t2.ucsd.edu/169.228.130.63 ************************************************************/ Could this be some sort of corruption on loading the image? Terrence From general-return-142-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 23 18:07:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31334 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 86123 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86080 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86070 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:07:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.56] (HELO QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:07:23 +0000 Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id WcvW1b0060SCNGk56i6rxp; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:06:51 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Wi6Z1b00R2SbwD53Vi6f6i; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:06:54 +0000 Message-Id: <297EBC6C-D1E4-4070-8010-C349F6F3624C@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--321129169 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: ApacheCon EU 2009 this week Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:06:32 -0700 Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1--321129169 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ApacheCon EU 2009 is in Amsterdam this week, with a lot of talks on Hadoop. There are also going to be a lot of the committers there, including Doug Cutting. There is no word yet whether he is bringing the "original" Hadoop as seen in the NY Times. This year the live video streaming includes the Hadoop track. The video of the keynote and lunch talks are free, but there is a charge for the Hadoop track. The Hadoop track this year includes: * Opening Keynote - Data Management in the Cloud - Raghu Ramakrishnan * Introduction to Hadoop - Owen O'Malley * Hadoop Map-Reduce: Tuning and Debugging - Arun Murthy * Pig: Making Hadoop Easy - Olga Natkovich * Running Hadoop in the Cloud - Tom White * Configuring Hadoop for Grid Services - Allen Wittenauer * Dynamic Hadoop Clusters - Steve Loughran -- Owen --Apple-Mail-1--321129169-- From general-return-143-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 23 20:31:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89465 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2009 20:31:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2009 20:31:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 8991 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 20:31:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8880 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 20:31:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8808 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2009 20:31:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.30] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:31:06 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1512226yxj.29 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=XnGBgm3k/u+MIglb9A4Grot+0RAUHxS2sFd7zAp+ghY=; b=QRBI2emrVU1u3fQeRZ3CSWp2eQ2fczypXZU0bijvwkS+zLU9W/0Nu1iTgpOpURNYX3 OCe8EDQIE3T2vB6qzTigoQlGwQh6r41MbHkS5Xu0LPimrxhpGn8USWSZwyTmmoJiKqaU w9jqJdXfz3zpRxe2tH2YbJnhKEsRHrTRRkmek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=lWRHAt4t/TJjpZQ5cnbOfkq8MQuldG+/+BVOq070BWNynZpmoB3+jEq7giUFqmMADi cLNWq+BFTfTMno56OVhqYh6umsaEd8wLzvdJuadpHI7BX9e32XuuK6lyAHht0o1WTXxf XsBz97oRgeEYDoMFwxpSrjFAYZa7AfT5CHK/4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.133.16 with SMTP id g16mr6989933and.136.1237840245083; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:30:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <297EBC6C-D1E4-4070-8010-C349F6F3624C@apache.org> References: <297EBC6C-D1E4-4070-8010-C349F6F3624C@apache.org> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:30:45 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 23f2cc32eedee571 Message-ID: <7c962aed0903231330y6c62663fx42c8eae57e5d847@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: ApacheCon EU 2009 this week From: stack To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646526618d8a20465cf2401 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646526618d8a20465cf2401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Riding on the below's coat-tails, there'll also be a talk on HBase on the wednesday at 3pm. Thanks, St.Ack On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > ApacheCon EU 2009 is in Amsterdam this week, with a lot of talks on > Hadoop. There are also going to be a lot of the committers there, including > Doug Cutting. There is no word yet whether he is bringing the "original" > Hadoop as seen in the NY Times. > > This year the live video streaming includes the Hadoop track. The video of > the keynote and lunch talks are free, but there is a charge for the Hadoop > track. > > The Hadoop track this year includes: > > * Opening Keynote - Data Management in the Cloud - Raghu Ramakrishnan > * Introduction to Hadoop - Owen O'Malley > * Hadoop Map-Reduce: Tuning and Debugging - Arun Murthy > * Pig: Making Hadoop Easy - Olga Natkovich > * Running Hadoop in the Cloud - Tom White > * Configuring Hadoop for Grid Services - Allen Wittenauer > * Dynamic Hadoop Clusters - Steve Loughran > > -- Owen > > --0016e646526618d8a20465cf2401-- From general-return-144-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 24 21:45:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72216 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 57045 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56996 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56986 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:45:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:44:58 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n2OLi3tH020480 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:44:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from apache@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id n2OLi3H2020479 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:44:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: apache set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from 10.173.214.212 ([10.173.214.212]) by mail.cs.ucf.edu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:44:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20090324174403.83006e4jos7t6tk0@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:44:03 -0400 From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. References: <17e74dd00903150658n4881efe7p209948cf60a9de49@mail.gmail.com> <17e74dd00903150703k7b19d9edg1b74030ab1cf4405@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <17e74dd00903150703k7b19d9edg1b74030ab1cf4405@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,J_CHICKENPOX_43 autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Is this your first time using Hadoop? or was this cluster running and then broke? were you trying to update hadoop? If this is the first time you've run it, then did you format the namenode? if not then run bin/hadoop namenode -format. start the cluster up using start-dfs.sh, that way you don't have to worry abou the job/tasktrackers... log into whatever node you have established as the master and simply run bin/hadoop namenode to see what error reporting you get. generally this will give you a better idea of what is happening. let me know the output of the namenode before I can help. thanks - Grant Quoting Xudong Du : > just now, I miswrite a command in the email, it is highlighted in red now. > Sorry. waiting for your help. thanks a lot. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Xudong Du > Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM > Subject: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > > Hello, everyone. I met a strange problem and I am looking forward to your > help. > > I setup a 2 nodes cluster hadoop on 2 mechine runing ubuntu. and 1 is both > master and slave and the other one is slave, and it seems to be functional. > but yesterday, it does not work anymore. > > when I type hadoop command such as "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", it shows that "Bad > connection to FS. command aborted." > so, I run "bin/start-all.sh" to see if the dfs is shut, however it shows > that: > > (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for > the other one's ip address) > starting namenode, logging to ***** > ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 14800. Stop it first. > ***.***.***.***: datanode running as process 9113. Stop it first. > ***.***.***.***: starting secondarynamenode, logging to *** > jobtracker running as process 14946. Stop it first. > ***.***.***.***: tasktracker running as process 15029. Stop it first. > ###.###.###.###: tasktracker running as process 9217. Stop it first. > > and i type "bin/hadoop dfs -ls", but again: Bad connection to FS. command > aborted. > > then when I type "bin/stop-all.sh(sorry, I mis-write just now )", it shows: > (***.***.***.*** stands for the master's ip address; ###.###.### stands for > the other one's ip address) > stopping jobtracker > ***.***.***.***: stopping tasktracker > ###.###.###: stopping tasktracker > no namenode to stop <--------this is very strange > ***.***.***.***: stopping datanode > ###.###.###: stopping datanode > ***.***.***.***: no secondarynamenode to stop > > when i restart it by "bin/start-all.sh", it still does not work.. > > can anyone give me some idea? Thanks a lot. > > -- > Yours Sincerely > Xudong Du > Zijing 2# 305A > Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 > > > > -- > Yours Sincerely > Xudong Du > Zijing 2# 305A > Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From general-return-145-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 24 21:49:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75728 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2009 21:49:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2009 21:49:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 67391 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 21:49:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67331 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 21:49:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67321 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2009 21:49:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:49:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [96.9.130.69] (HELO sophia.codeminders.com) (96.9.130.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:49:33 +0000 Received: from [172.16.1.53] (pool-71-116-87-51.snfcca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.116.87.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sophia.codeminders.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3770281865 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Vadim Zaliva To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20090324174403.83006e4jos7t6tk0@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-31--221370935; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [ask for help]Bad connection to FS. command aborted. Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:49:10 -0700 References: <17e74dd00903150658n4881efe7p209948cf60a9de49@mail.gmail.com> <17e74dd00903150703k7b19d9edg1b74030ab1cf4405@mail.gmail.com> <20090324174403.83006e4jos7t6tk0@mail.cs.ucf.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-31--221370935 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mar 24, 2009, at 14:44 , Grant Mackey wrote: > Is this your first time using Hadoop? or was this cluster running > and then broke? were you trying to update hadoop? Grant, The cluster is running for a while and I have quite a few tasks which I am executing regularly. It is just and intermittent problem which I observe only with PIG on some of tasks. From googling it seems like some deadlock bug in Java threading which people reported on some other java programs, not only pig/hadoop. Vadim -- "La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien a ajouter, mais quand il ne reste rien a enlever." (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) --Apple-Mail-31--221370935 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGQDCCAvkw ggJioAMCAQICEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA4MDgwNDE4MDY1MloXDTA5MDgwNDE4MDY1 MlowXTEPMA0GA1UEBBMGWmFsaXZhMQ4wDAYDVQQqEwVWYWRpbTEVMBMGA1UEAxMMVmFkaW0gWmFs aXZhMSMwIQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhRsb3JkQGNvZGVtaW5kZXJzLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJp/hSCd9qKL3z67jLQ/rBeXMRgkL43ZL7wTXjUnS8OfVGYeRT2jLN06 JEouCV0ndiQwDT1Am8xq2IdZC1h/CEZJGrvj663uvrxFCadh2pqT2pFnq7VCiBsekFyc/uhE8NOF It8doKZmzKrQQJ2iX94EdhEIP/mACO3+n9j0TBqSa7z4hfn8DYNW6MkZX4VGlcAm/d3ueTlcoiQ5 lrcTw3i5aK4SBTiReLaHQKoyU2FYvk0A3728MQjcU4sIJDpUTKCnzLMLmJHaSgdq9Ey7nDSUKb0F CHVjsgp+dr/6ozRgmvIcs+WfEo1ELBuFfi+U6ESXlOy26qH3coOS7LXT9gsCAwEAAaMxMC8wHwYD VR0RBBgwFoEUbG9yZEBjb2RlbWluZGVycy5jb20wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOBgQCbuIPK+DCnk/9WGG2Wv1kdmqj41IjBR7oXQ5GsWfDi6uKGWdzz/Z628YcirynXqr3bgJze IvJ5XbkFuGe0SHl5HsXtKBeTNjqBS+lZQ8+eXkxuJTrFGzvn72EhY1E1NmYntVaCblizQmZIu/aq zScU5ibqWqntjn8P7Iu3GSE9QTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0xMzA3 MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5 KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCBnzAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9VvyGna9 fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0Dviv+ uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNVHRMB Af8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9UaGF3 dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEaMBgG A1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNmrGcP f6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQlGLH 2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11fZU8x ggMQMIIDDAIBATB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQ REyhjgt+jtruwuGAot4tyzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBbzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcB MBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wOTAzMjQyMTQ5MTBaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQ1J0t6V/CYnXPs eTb0piJz3/nNvDCBhQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMXgwdjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcswgYcGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMXigdjBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UE AxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECEERMoY4Lfo7a7sLhgKLeLcsw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAF37XECorc9hNCovIvFnn2KtWIJzGUPe9DTebL7e6QO9DiMh6QWbg 9L5AQW1roTUzhoDazY+MGI1apZl5Vm2Q0LmbWTYy1HxHhpz0b6id0MCpMkqLhp2rc500RHU0aNMr E4AOw191KeNMXc8PPcMCZptTbMUQj69x0BjvXNi26Vrnd9LQlcj1h0sBOfWax2VlKFod74ZeKlON jpGT9xkYF1NaFe773hQbGtOJC7NKzKgds1NGKdfmoWhZNnxKWZ8BiaM7zfybi81Idhaa7lRcUjA5 u98vXYN1QzNoVYSOOWcIf4nZWK1maUf86/5i8Gy8C1zAGfVfSx5z9m/vAHquWAAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-31--221370935-- From general-return-146-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 27 18:00:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40946 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2009 18:00:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2009 18:00:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 80536 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2009 18:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80192 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2009 18:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79822 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2009 18:00:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:00:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:00:48 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.171] (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-171.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n2RI0KVI065014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49CD1434.2040502@apache.org> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:00:20 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.1.1. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. If you are upgrading from version 2.2.1 on SourceForge be sure to review the 3.0.1 release notes for migration instructions. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.1.1 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.1.1/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-147-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 31 14:31:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38358 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2009 14:31:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2009 14:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 76115 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2009 14:31:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76066 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2009 14:31:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99372 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2009 03:50:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amaltasb@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.176 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=j+b46bmN9eLRGGVB6+jya+/tQ7W/htfHvYc2AihQW+8=; b=Ou18G5ZbQ8TD5mQMNPsTXIMZ0OAGCZ7xWBWyqSMsR5dRI9UCaWncWiKdWAlv4niwZo b7KB3HPnhr7YVrYMeRHAC5GKkhGRheXyef/19MwIPSfM3fg2z/2PHJkTjx2vjsdviZW9 105J3iDxftlrcXyR9UcaQphSTvgAP2AgSofVo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PZwyR3tyBEc0BMsbZhR9DYziFSyjh/kVRQdSTVQ655JxgNM4FAGj5PbOwnVT0TvEy+ OV7dFLSKEzfzDWD2dxqSQ9dg7PHH2ntrGTZxGhtQeicCoVKmLhOA/ta23wsqalVYB1y/ L4eHbuTQ28Nj90DZHEiob2fYypEO+LywbY8bo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:19:36 +0530 Message-ID: <1a2551840903302049u28744c78t2c94ef8d29c8562b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Berkeley DB as Hadoop Input From: Amal To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502de86763f54046662167f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502de86763f54046662167f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have around 3 million rows of data stored in Berkeley DB Java Edition. Is it possible to use this database as a MapReduce Input to Hadoop. If not, what is the alternative storage engine, mainly for storing key/value pairs (no relational features or transactional support needed), so that I can run mapreduce on it. Thanks --00504502de86763f54046662167f-- From general-return-1007-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 01 21:44:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22040 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2010 21:44:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2010 21:44:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 88280 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2010 21:44:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87507 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2010 21:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87221 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2010 21:44:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:44:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.153 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.153] (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:44:08 +0000 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o11LTaOV007374; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:29:36 -0700 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o11Lhgu3170848; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:43:42 -0700 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o11LjrL7028174; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:45:53 -0700 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o11LjrVJ028171; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:45:53 -0700 To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: First Official Austin Hadoop User Group - March 18th X-KeepSent: F3BD88CD:7E5F1E7B-862576BD:0075427B; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:43:41 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 02/01/2010 14:43:42, Serialize complete at 02/01/2010 14:43:42 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00775B14862576BD_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 00775B14862576BD_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks This note is to let you know that we'll be kicking off the inaugural Austin Hadoop User Group on March the 18th. At present, we have speakers lined up from IBM and Rackspace and will cover quite a wide variety of topics along with a few demos. This event will follow directly on the heels of the SXSW Interactive conference. Pizza, beer and soft drinks will be provided BUT we are still looking for a location to host the meeting somewhere downtown or reasonably close to it. Do you work for a company that would be interesting in sponsoring a location ? I believe we're likely to have within 15 to 30 attendees initially so we'd need a large room with a projector. The initial sentiment, based on discussions I've had with people interested in attending, is that the group will cover both Hadoop and Big Data concerns in general. If you'd like to attend, present a topic or are interested in sponsorship, please send me a note directly so I can put you on the distribution list (and it will also help me with catering). I'll also be posting the event on the door64.com event calendar. Kind regards Steve Watt swatt@us.ibm.com --=_alternative 00775B14862576BD_=-- From general-return-1008-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 02 11:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95353 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2010 11:13:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2010 11:13:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 68304 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 11:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68233 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 11:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68223 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2010 11:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:13:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D07EB7E03 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:13:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VM6-a1vZyqLI for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F999B7D88 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:12:59 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1265713968.93393@tLPYYLOHCUebq0mQtJtkuQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o12BClEV024092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:12:48 GMT Message-ID: <4B6808AE.9000106@apache.org> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:12:46 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hadoop General Subject: HPLabs Palo Alto internship opportunity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o12BClEV024092 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am pleased to forward on this announcement of an opportunity for a student to spend some time at HPLaboratories in California doing fun things. This isn't the bit of HPLabs where I work (I'm based in the EU), but these are some of my colleagues who are doing some really interesting stuff. As it's not my group, I'm not in a position to field questions about it, -please follow the link at the bottom of the posting -Steve ---------- In HP Labs at Palo Alto (http://www.hpl.hp.com/), we are currently seeking qualified self-motivated MS and PhD students for the following intern position in software and systems research. This position is in the area of large-scale data management, with the focus of developing a scalable platform as a cloud service to store and manage data and enforce data management policies. This cloud service aims to help service providers protect outsourced customer data and meet compliance requirements. The involved data policies include data retention, data availability, data integrity, data migration, and data access control, among others. This position requires deep knowledge and hands-on experience with distributed systems and service-oriented computing, which include database, transactional and parallel processing, high availability and fault tolerance, and other related disciplines. This position also requires strong object-oriented programming and web development skills (Java related platforms preferred). Experience with Hadoop and Map/Reduce and knowledge of secure computing (e.g., identity management, access control) are desired but not required. Qualified candidates must have excellent communication skills and the ability to work independently and in a team. To apply to this position, please visit https://hp.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobsearch.ftl?lang=en, and at the "Job Number" field, enter the number "385468". Then press the button "Search for Jobs". The search result will bring up this specific position related page, from which the online application to this position can be started. From general-return-1009-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 02 16:51:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21139 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2010 16:51:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2010 16:51:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 44817 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 16:51:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44245 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 16:51:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44056 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2010 16:51:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:51:41 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcLo5-0008RD-PY; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:40:53 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, katta-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, debian-java@lists.debian.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [RFH][Announce] hadoop on its way into Debian Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:51:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31-1-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201002021751.14884.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, there's an attempt, to get hadoop into the Debian Linux distribution. For n= ow,=20 this is more a pre-announce, since the package still has to pass some revie= w.=20 But you may already want to add your review and comments to the current sta= te: Packaging repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=3Dpkg-java/hadoop.git Source package: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hadoop No binary package for now. If you do not now, how to build the binary packa= ge,=20 you may most likely want to wait until other have reviewed the packaging. =46rom the TODO list/wishlist: * Package native libraries * Package more contribs * Work with upstream on a build system, that can be reused for packaging * Test the package for reliability * Cleanup the shell scripts * Add logrotation to everything in /var/log/hadoop You can meet me next weekend at fosdem, if you like: http://www.koch.ro/blog/index.php?/archives/136-Going-to-FOSDEM-2010.html Thanks to cloudera for their initial work on debian packaging! Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1010-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 02 23:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34796 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2010 23:46:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2010 23:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 35622 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 23:46:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35262 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2010 23:46:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35192 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2010 23:46:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.224] (HELO mail-fx0-f224.google.com) (209.85.220.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:46:17 +0000 Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so71222fxm.11 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:45:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=t6LkpfpMdX1KLS8ifCuIqURDr8qTYJQdOPJcdgPNE3Q=; b=YPHCtZJ7NufgByeu3BwDiSICyaUClRZQz//N96UETQWcFcGRbwpwQX+Vq9Ut1/LSZ7 QpUZJniX5ZZESv7HGnGRDAH+9plfI3shQEgE2dZC6Kq/6faq/qjfvHJgIy5OOdHuSi4b CKmxxRGLne8UDMpxwlQy0ctJ+CE5iFd7YVACo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wgV6gNviyU8yJNqyNMD6uie/4DN+V6VGKzyaoPM7DCkh5L8uYYxodBsxiXy+zW2SaV mIZYAlTXR4Xfjw2Qg1guJgzlaCsF3FCBE7+DIcbmqD06UCkg4tSGi6ZpH8AUcKGYDpEl jPzbuPc6v3CDSXtsUNpscZMzn/WMm9vJy8sFw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.48.38 with SMTP id a38mr4568570muk.37.1265154355812; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:45:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:45:55 +0100 Message-ID: <309f76d01002021545n4170af2dr2120bb45b9c208aa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: READING A FILE AND PUSHING CONTENTS IN A STRUCTURE From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f46cf6d90a047ea6b374 --0016e659f46cf6d90a047ea6b374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi people! For the last two days I=B4m facing this problem: In the setup function of Reducer class, I=B4m trying to read a file (with a value per line) located in HDFS and putting them into a Hashtable the following way: @Override protected void setup(Context cont) throws IOException{ try { FileSystem hdfs =3D FileSystem.get(new Configuration()); Path path =3D new Path(HDFS_REDUCER_CONFIGURATION_FILE); //Validation if (!hdfs.exists(path)) { throw new IOException("File" +HDFS_REDUCER_CONFIGURATION_FILE + "doesnt exist"); } if (!hdfs.isFile(path)) { throw new IOException("File" +HDFS_REDUCER_CONFIGURATION_FILE + "doesnt exist"); } FSDataInputStream dis =3D hdfs.open(path); String input=3D""; while ((input =3D dis.readUTF()) !=3D null) { String numPop =3D dis.readUTF(); parameters.put("numPopulation", Integer.getInteger(numPop))= ; String maxIter =3D dis.readUTF(); parameters.put("maxIterations", Integer.getInteger(maxIter)); } dis.close(); } catch (IOException ioe) { System.err.println("REDUCER: IOException reading Reducer configuration file"); System.err.println(ioe.toString()); } } But when I try to access the elements of the structure (parameters) I get null values, caused-probably- because I=B4m not reading well those values. What I=B4m doing wrong? Another way to do this? Thanks a lot in advance. PD: I forgot to mention that I=B4m working in pseudo-distributed mode. --=20 Alberto --0016e659f46cf6d90a047ea6b374-- From general-return-1011-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 03 12:35:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97159 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 12:35:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 12:35:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 19377 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 12:35:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19280 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 12:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19267 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 12:35:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:35:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nipen.mark@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:35:15 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so1211422yxe.2 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:34:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=CXAn2YeYQ0Qor4OlIOebO1MpEofOyLNNRrR608VXo68=; b=jewgaOt7vUqD2KEYNU4vmMPdUR/Sor0mIBjHno4h0fsO871E+61i22EXM4INYj8FrV id1t/EmX1RhixEC+wZQC7hN9fcf6XNPQ/BttFlZczuNxvOh0mPgG47C7f1AZ52XlWo0s A8YnlAgJunQHFBkJ38YDghlbV14pdPg/Ul8/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=C5Wo5g73Xff/oSPRQE08bgrjQ6L1jfdbkGLAdCaIgYlQAYSceusm9aPBiSNhJkP/k2 PjLFmZHOtYUOHxeUqWOdM18kU8Fncq0k18pSlZCpeENQ9kLuMmthGlJyNGTsck5KPt6L vSIGejGnZCJKd6K74YhuDR41zFLWoIdrcPLjI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.84.17 with SMTP id m17mr4573942agl.15.1265200491245; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:34:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:19:51 +0545 Message-ID: Subject: Job Tracker questions From: Mark N To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f92baad9b1b3047eb171cd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f92baad9b1b3047eb171cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We have a hadoop job running and have used custom counters to track few counters ( like no of successfully processed documents matching certain conditions) Since we need to get this counters even while the Hadoop job is running , we wrote another Java program to read these counters *Counter reader program *will do the following : 1) List all the running jobs. 2) Get the running job using Job name 2) Get all the counter for individual running jobs 3) Set this counters in variables. We could successfully read these counters , but since we need to show these counters to custom UI , how can we show these counters? we looked into various options to read these counters to show in UI as following : 1. Dump these counters to database , however this may be overhead 2. Write web service and UI will invoke the functions from these service to show in UI ( However since we need to run "*Counter reader program " *with Hadoop command it might not be feasible to write web service ? ) so the question is can we achive to read the counters using simple Java APIs ? Does anyone have idea how does the default jobtracker JSP works ? we wanted to built something similar to this thanks -- Nipen Mark --001485f92baad9b1b3047eb171cd-- From general-return-1012-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 03 14:48:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54035 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 14:48:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 14:48:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 83947 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 14:48:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83861 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 14:48:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83851 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 14:48:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:48:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:48:46 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so2432031pxi.5 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:48:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=smaTWCsGqSQUDtSWoBzyKqyCV4HCMyQ4Tca3rUWNS/o=; b=X9dIn9bkTgcOBKrpWDWlYxgIlDqSAjFrXKtth2fOuw1xuCxK5mhj/yNhineZvLyXZF RMvPpx+2JgqVulqBsLkCM/zObj5dI6sc4vIBhfdgSeY/dNFlE2MVDSPI9ykQni8xsZej NDsCyUSlBxWU3dbzAm6J9kADTlcf/FuZAlxkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hTvVurnbOAkczR65DZ92M9xlg5HNOgl4sRTMAtr2QMUay4kbSKCogEbIEYFKE76BOT SQmjD6kppNHJsj/lOHmSmYht7f8PF2sN7yjqI1vB0PjTtJQbq39iuDZQsVtHj4XJ6lVa bPVkApjtZqJAsCR1ae454zZfmDyTQSpBLUz44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.154.2 with SMTP id g2mr1539132wfo.114.1265208505036; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:48:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:48:24 -0800 Message-ID: <8211a1321002030648h565edc02yf8e41bdc2ca51cc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Job Tracker questions From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0a6c08271b1047eb34fdc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0a6c08271b1047eb34fdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think you can use JobClient to get the counters in your web service. If you look at the shell script bin/hadoop, you will find that actually this shell use the JobClient to get the counters. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Mark N wrote: > We have a hadoop job running and have used custom counters to track few > counters ( like no of successfully processed documents matching certain > conditions) > > > Since we need to get this counters even while the Hadoop job is running , > we > wrote another Java program to read these counters > > > *Counter reader program *will do the following : > > > 1) List all the running jobs. > > 2) Get the running job using Job name > > 2) Get all the counter for individual running jobs > > 3) Set this counters in variables. > We could successfully read these counters , but since we need to > show these counters to custom UI , how can we show these counters? > > we looked into various options to read these counters to show in UI > as following : > > 1. Dump these counters to database , however this may be overhead > 2. Write web service and UI will invoke the functions from these > service to show in UI ( However since we need to run "*Counter reader > program " *with Hadoop command it might not be feasible to write web > service ? ) > > so the question is can we achive to read the counters using simple > Java APIs ? Does anyone have idea how does the default jobtracker JSP works > ? we wanted to built something similar to this > > thanks > > > > -- > Nipen Mark > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang --001636e0a6c08271b1047eb34fdc-- From general-return-1013-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 03 21:53:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42609 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 21:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 21:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 13678 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13624 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13611 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:53:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of krystiankichewko@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.193] (HELO mail-iw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.223.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:53:36 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so403461iwn.20 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:53:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TCsr1W1dsC/U4rDMUNAxmDn7q0ttx0CIcRaFpGX7z6U=; b=DHyhxKyNKT+/oaXSQfqOPYuJvP2epChAfgTPfrrOLcp1JDXuI8iBOMxlSaMIr9cKUQ /UIeWt89igQc0qeiHBuUsscLwP+HYQv0Ka/sGN3xGESIjeMOb3kabxydAr1E6fDo0RX0 h3cQjB0CoIPY4ILN/3g29Bc9UY97ngZU+Ji3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=d2s6R9/GbGN+gIPPjMjJ5WMpMgrFpBn8UPE5Mkfpqsknf53+7YYFiBCnq8z0KG4PeT fXoGQgUR5W6uFWrWgJU1Dr4n42FaGdlrS12Q4OHhE2ry55UlEFLwDIQjt7r4jpQDudgn pVae1EvGlaLQ15sc0O+mtDJOKgRORoKYS9uOI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.159.207 with SMTP id k15mr342387ibx.75.1265233995681; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:53:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:53:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop in maven repository, From: Krystian Kichewko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello! I have a question: Is hadoop available in maven repositories? After a little bit of search I found this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/core-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg00241.html It is a bit old 2yrs, and I still can't find official hadoop jars in maven repository. There are jars from apache mahout project but I'm not sure if this is pure hadoop core or with some kind of pathes/changes. I'm using hdfs client in my project which is built using maven 2, and it would be alot easier if I could get official hadoop core jar from maven repository. Is there any chance of pushing hadoop into maven repositories? Thanks in advance! Krystian Kichewko From general-return-1014-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 03 22:50:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69951 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 22:50:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2010 22:50:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 91820 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 22:50:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91729 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2010 22:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91719 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2010 22:50:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:50:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of drew.farris@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.193] (HELO mail-iw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.223.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:49:57 +0000 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so460416iwn.20 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s7cWtApt9HHsXmra8MvZIC+jDbmjlmgRbvXcu3VlYmg=; b=weraPY5rlqnueOYFTTF/LqIjmR45OhMsq1YRo6OjD9SIpujhLFSLAJFHPU6bGDtcCv Er0xfdGekaM1af9Tykn/FxFLmgmlU3Gm7Xdl//DueLqVSo63TwTWy79y37/VvXO91gWe IgrrLI/JfL2Wm6dDTm08MvjCbPeKUlf4VKfM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xheAYRbHmRBQgmhhcWO44jCpy0b5xVFDQSypD0LNJXBPefIpzObakFqc7HTdGSnhw0 2KBvG595kAK8oQXTk3BdqS1dm5k2jPRex7J0YbQNLH42/3pfqhwIsJP2jxZ26Oqirqo0 +iqd4343TWPfvq+4QT+yU/5bCbv2UB+figqtE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.154.197 with SMTP id p5mr519284ibw.28.1265237376835; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8f8e14c41002031446h21efec4csf8f1ec695d19fd9f@mail.gmail.com> References: <8f8e14c41002031446h21efec4csf8f1ec695d19fd9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:49:36 -0500 Message-ID: <8f8e14c41002031449i252f1817hed2b48afaa3b3910@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop in maven repository, From: Drew Farris To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92c896720c4047eba0809 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c92c896720c4047eba0809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Krystian, repository.apache.org contains some of the hadoop artifacts. That is the best place to start. Drew On Feb 3, 2010 4:53 PM, "Krystian Kichewko" wrote: Hello! I have a question: Is hadoop available in maven repositories? After a little bit of search I found this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/core-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg00241.html It is a bit old 2yrs, and I still can't find official hadoop jars in maven repository. There are jars from apache mahout project but I'm not sure if this is pure hadoop core or with some kind of pathes/changes. I'm using hdfs client in my project which is built using maven 2, and it would be alot easier if I could get official hadoop core jar from maven repository. Is there any chance of pushing hadoop into maven repositories? Thanks in advance! Krystian Kichewko --001636c92c896720c4047eba0809-- From general-return-1015-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 04 02:36:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82931 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 02:36:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 02:36:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 90871 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 02:36:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90617 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 02:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90597 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 02:36:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:36:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:36:02 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o142ZJto013215; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:35:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=erKgseSsYPVBOXibtLiR4Is/5hwRm+RHCPInjRWs9RvVnktMUR005HWmNRd2SkZp Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:35:19 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:35:17 -0800 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Feb 17th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Feb 17th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCpfO4pAWCVl24A== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDBF8B10A@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, RSVP is open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yahoo! = Sunnyvale Campus, Wednesday, Feb 17th, 6PM Registration and Agenda are available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/12497904/ Looking forward to seeing you there! Dekel From general-return-1016-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 04 03:52:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2569 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 03:52:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 03:52:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 42713 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 03:52:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42529 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 03:52:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42500 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 03:52:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:52:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:52:20 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o143p3Lh044681; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:51:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer; b=UQdyN6m829qrt5KTt6fbnBN8GnzK1KnWbSQbqnBZggHcepv4/YugWhKl0aIYd5Cl Message-Id: <715AE598-D615-4E75-B42A-6EF685AF3F0A@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: New Hadoop Map-Reduce Committer: Vinod Kumar V. Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:51:03 -0800 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hadoop PMC has voted to make Vinod Kumar V. a committer on Hadoop Map-Reduce. Congratulations, Vinod. Thanks again for all your valuable contributions, we look forward to more! Arun From general-return-1017-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 04 05:17:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20496 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 05:17:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 05:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 1766 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 05:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1538 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 05:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1528 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 05:17:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:17:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zqmaster@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.209] (HELO mail-gx0-f209.google.com) (209.85.217.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:17:16 +0000 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so2155175gxk.11 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:16:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x0+N7NNVySfdyHyVffJRObJMDOh/Dp3BUPfKCbnKeBE=; b=LHPCTgyRCKCF6zHhHlcxXBpVZlOujAESVEfD0pZwUFKmBWEWNecLnnzDw4QRRysVnE 1B6m9sx2rd0ZmYkfZb7HWikJNe/d1CUKt1jNmEGhZNU3X5PEZeEYpko0lWfRRF9Ye3wy KH1R3AkOtvr8Tl/gBDQ2c9k3T7MRIc/4uckXc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OyGO2I9QUpi8Nms+863gvsUpa/6MASsbkCUP2b30upf1R+Tces+4yuPs7FZ3cjTmXl a/EK5/dQuuhMPxSqGUzqDed1S01ezyO4eBvTQDbALOWd89QmtM/7ZK5ShNJ3uMjggRRy bVg9f3k8UCTlHXO2skc+jH7JxMt6jgCVBwJaM= Received: by 10.100.245.29 with SMTP id s29mr707610anh.146.1265260615732; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? (cpe-174-096-108-211.carolina.res.rr.com [174.96.108.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm2806837ywf.40.2010.02.03.21.16.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:16:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B6A5844.2090505@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:16:52 -0500 From: "Ma, Zhiqiang" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: help for beginner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, I am a beginner of Hadoop. I modified the Inverted Index Code in Yahoo's Tutorial (http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module4.html#solution), but I always get errors of "java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable". Could some people tell me what is wrong in my code? Thanks a million! Zhiqiang ----------------------------code starts-------------------------------------- import java.io.IOException; import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.StringTokenizer; import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; import org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable; import org.apache.hadoop.io.Text; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputFormat; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileSplit; import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCollector; import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Reporter; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper; import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Reducer; public class YahooIndex { public static class MyMapper extends Mapper { private final static Text word = new Text(); private final static Text location = new Text(); public void map(LongWritable key, Text val, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { FileSplit fileSplit = (FileSplit)reporter.getInputSplit(); String fileName = fileSplit.getPath().getName(); location.set(fileName); String line = val.toString(); StringTokenizer itr = new StringTokenizer(line.toLowerCase()); while (itr.hasMoreTokens()) { word.set(itr.nextToken()); output.collect(word, location); } } } public static class MyReducer extends Reducer { public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { boolean first = true; StringBuilder toReturn = new StringBuilder(); while (values.hasNext()){ if (!first) toReturn.append(", "); first=false; toReturn.append(values.next().toString()); } output.collect(key, new Text(toReturn.toString())); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, InterruptedException, ClassNotFoundException { Configuration conf = new Configuration(); Job job = new Job(conf, "Example Hadoop 0.20.1 WordCount"); job.setJarByClass(YahooIndex.class); job.setMapperClass(MyMapper.class); job.setReducerClass(MyReducer.class); job.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); job.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path("input")); FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(job, new Path("output")); System.exit(job.waitForCompletion(true) ? 0 : 1); } } -----------------------------------code ends----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From general-return-1018-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 04 08:26:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90967 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 08:26:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 08:26:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 85818 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 08:26:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85742 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 08:26:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85732 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 08:26:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:26:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.194] (HELO mail-iw0-f194.google.com) (209.85.223.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:26:04 +0000 Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so846241iwn.21 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:25:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MOPqmHBmjM7RPrFzKLVUUbyTqyBx4MHypozMy3glWbA=; b=I5Gufbz6NuoJ8pitMQGEOPVgBctzfNioVYlUQdTHMGtTbesMM/4Qnocd3rPGwzhwlj 7e+cmx6169KX3c0PITHxDX2VezDgXUOxAAwv5qmUipGitdJeXYvWpbNWieT1KOqCniTK RXnxPGjZ8z1W7UWAPFAkCNNwkjw7fWCJ0mk/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=a9TUyEe6DksAlZbADyAUfo8L50GsF3oUhcitSVyhVJbTyTjnk5D7TCLq8FXi0XrfEm vfawKrSZgcoIrGSDOlmjHNeEmYnGihmMDm5Yq4mHVex9Q5mFGL7NvTzK50/C2ABuk/X8 WwOrM+b/MDmXJnU0tVnerBowtmLXrA+LSgyBw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.138 with SMTP id r10mr1464434ibx.34.1265271942293; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:25:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:25:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?amF2YS5pby5JT0V4Y2VwdGlvbjogQ2Fubm90IG9wZW4gZmlsZW5hbWUgL3VzZXIvcm9vdA==?= =?UTF-8?B?L++/vXPvv71077+9Ze+/vXDvv70x77+9L++/vXDvv71h77+9cu+/vXTvv70t77+9MO+/vTDvv70w77+9?= =?UTF-8?B?MO+/vTA=?= From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5971baa2fa4047ec214a9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5971baa2fa4047ec214a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi I dont understand the reason for this error. java.io.IOException: Cannot open filename /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/=EF= =BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF= =BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.openInfo(DFSClient.java:139= 4) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.(DFSClient.java:1385) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.open(DFSClient.java:338) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.open(DistributedFileSystem.jav= a:171) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:359) at org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:40) at org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:1) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:436) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:158) I have a code that scans a folder step0 to find name of files generated in the previous map-reduce phase. Then create another file with the entries fo= r ex: if scanning finds that there are 2 files produced by 1st map-reduce phase, then new created file will have 2 entries step1/part00000 and step1/part00001 i.e. one entry for each file. Now, when I read this file in another map-reduce job, each line is read as /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/=EF= =BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF= =BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 . What it seems like, a string inserted by my code, when read by FSDataInputStream prefix each character o= f the string by a question mark (?). Why is that so? The file name part-00000 do exist inside folder step1, but reading this filename, /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF= =BF=BD/=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF= =BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 , throws IOException which I can undersand that there is no such filename, but why are these ?'s infiltraded before each letter. Really appreciate if some one can help me solve this riddle? Thanks and Regards H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --001636c5971baa2fa4047ec214a9-- From general-return-1019-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 04 11:00:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49345 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2010 11:00:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2010 11:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 72771 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 11:00:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72210 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2010 11:00:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72149 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2010 11:00:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:00:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nipen.mark@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.209] (HELO mail-gx0-f209.google.com) (209.85.217.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:00:02 +0000 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so2312276gxk.11 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cXwWGokMwVbpBJSvrXSy0AaMMmcxz8S1KhUZcnOiG/I=; b=oafuYCINu2TqOV79fXTs/y9JTzmCGJZlzuJtVNFSO3SdAtd06HMYwgHRv+3zTF5LRf wyV/D2qegMJfC6t816O/0P9IAIivgC/Bc/FsPmReYtOlTBhoeRRAloA3Z/Kyw9X+SIU9 4KIHP9wu23YD3D/bPbPWDYDm6EB1ve47Yvv9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ndyQGNZYAuUmWy+DMTWked5a6tk8PyUeIgzOtpjCp2YujLJyjpwFd7oHypWHXrGGce yZtlg9CEI0D9cfPLhuFVUtMkqHsWCTyyhVgofJP6VRSF+SNdm5eU4U3B0kCUTMctx57l qA56i0eKa3NRu5MkdvLr5F3c1HzrLiCRxv3JA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.164.39 with SMTP id r39mr1007306ago.113.1265281179432; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:59:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8211a1321002030648h565edc02yf8e41bdc2ca51cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <8211a1321002030648h565edc02yf8e41bdc2ca51cc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:44:39 +0545 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Job Tracker questions From: Mark N To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f5ea343db781047ec43b19 --001485f5ea343db781047ec43b19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ye currently am using jobclient to read these counters. But We are not able to use *webservices *because the jar which is used to read the counters from running hadoop job is itself a Hadoop program If we could have pure Java Api which is run without hadoop command then we could return the counter variable into webservices and show in UI. Any help or technique to show thsese counters in the UI would be appreciated ( not necessarily using web service ) I am using webservices because I am having .net VB client thanks On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > I think you can use JobClient to get the counters in your web service. > If you look at the shell script bin/hadoop, you will find that actually > this > shell use the JobClient to get the counters. > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Mark N wrote: > > > We have a hadoop job running and have used custom counters to track few > > counters ( like no of successfully processed documents matching certain > > conditions) > > > > > > Since we need to get this counters even while the Hadoop job is running , > > we > > wrote another Java program to read these counters > > > > > > *Counter reader program *will do the following : > > > > > > 1) List all the running jobs. > > > > 2) Get the running job using Job name > > > > 2) Get all the counter for individual running jobs > > > > 3) Set this counters in variables. > > We could successfully read these counters , but since we need to > > show these counters to custom UI , how can we show these counters? > > > > we looked into various options to read these counters to show in > UI > > as following : > > > > 1. Dump these counters to database , however this may be overhead > > 2. Write web service and UI will invoke the functions from these > > service to show in UI ( However since we need to run "*Counter reader > > program " *with Hadoop command it might not be feasible to write web > > service ? ) > > > > so the question is can we achive to read the counters using simple > > Java APIs ? Does anyone have idea how does the default jobtracker JSP > works > > ? we wanted to built something similar to this > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > -- > > Nipen Mark > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > -- Nipen Mark --001485f5ea343db781047ec43b19-- From general-return-1020-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 05 18:50:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60188 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2010 18:50:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2010 18:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 57060 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 18:50:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56971 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2010 18:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56961 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2010 18:50:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.48] (HELO qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:49:54 +0000 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eG1i1d01K0bG4ec55Jom6x; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:48:46 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id eJpQ1d00R2SbwD53PJpUeC; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:49:32 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-13--674245159 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Welcome Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:49:23 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-13--674245159 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Hadoop PMC has added the following committers to its ranks: Daniel Dai Pradeep Kamath Tsz Wo (Nicholas) Sze Thanks for all of your hard work on Hadoop! -- Owen --Apple-Mail-13--674245159-- From general-return-1021-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 08 14:51:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95796 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2010 14:51:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2010 14:51:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 44006 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 14:51:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43932 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 14:51:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43922 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2010 14:51:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:51:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.175] (HELO mail-pz0-f175.google.com) (209.85.222.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:50:55 +0000 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so6162232pzk.29 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:50:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xGSQue9Iw4ZwskDSGHeI1lia+gRBrINm05XzeRLmrUE=; b=I9jfWdCCmEELmby7BH4tvrCx8wU3aBSDe48irIzWbsGj9C+tkGGpU9HuaWkkxEQJ5Z AkH+PF28KOyAdV1Ik98F4tcQ0lr+I+XEbNa4Rva0EHJK5Izq6nuvBSJFY0sw0lBPStoA pmxo1LJ7uM4mS2zf3ScHs8AITsovmHEhV7dhM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rkuBcnqkP8ktzblC0s/juJwBfO0T6nf3UGIotTzxNPY0OF1d2W5RJnnawHe1vpXXiw gm6t8IDZlcl8Paaklx/vTcUC0iSMI14PiwzD6IqrMRYpQGLwoTzJtyyOk6QDasscnj8c xeIMZn3kD3eQPSWmrsfk9UDdoa79+aOKGbAxg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.105.12 with SMTP id h12mr4591865rvm.64.1265640632114; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:50:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B6A5844.2090505@gmail.com> References: <4B6A5844.2090505@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:50:32 -0800 Message-ID: <314098691002080650me3ca315gf05894d92d28a0ce@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: help for beginner From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1389e4a5f35047f17ecea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1389e4a5f35047f17ecea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This class of problem has a pretty standard answer http://www.prohadoopbook.com/forum/topics/type-mismatch-error On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Ma, Zhiqiang wrote: > Hi All, > > I am a beginner of Hadoop. I modified the Inverted Index Code in Yahoo's > Tutorial ( > http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module4.html#solution), but I > always get errors of "java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: > expected org.apache.hadoop.io.Text, recieved > org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable". Could some people tell me what is wrong > in my code? Thanks a million! > > Zhiqiang > > ----------------------------code > starts-------------------------------------- > import java.io.IOException; > import java.util.Iterator; > import java.util.StringTokenizer; > > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.Text; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileInputFormat; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.output.FileOutputFormat; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.FileSplit; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCollector; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Reporter; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper; > import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Reducer; > > public class YahooIndex { > > public static class MyMapper extends Mapper Text> { > > private final static Text word = new Text(); > private final static Text location = new Text(); > > public void map(LongWritable key, Text val, > OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) > throws IOException { > > FileSplit fileSplit = (FileSplit)reporter.getInputSplit(); > String fileName = fileSplit.getPath().getName(); > location.set(fileName); > > String line = val.toString(); > StringTokenizer itr = new StringTokenizer(line.toLowerCase()); > while (itr.hasMoreTokens()) { > word.set(itr.nextToken()); > output.collect(word, location); > } > } > } > > > > public static class MyReducer extends Reducer { > > public void reduce(Text key, Iterator values, > OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) > throws IOException { > > boolean first = true; > StringBuilder toReturn = new StringBuilder(); > while (values.hasNext()){ > if (!first) > toReturn.append(", "); > first=false; > toReturn.append(values.next().toString()); > } > > output.collect(key, new Text(toReturn.toString())); > } > } > > > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, > InterruptedException, ClassNotFoundException { > Configuration conf = new Configuration(); > Job job = new Job(conf, "Example Hadoop 0.20.1 WordCount"); > job.setJarByClass(YahooIndex.class); > job.setMapperClass(MyMapper.class); > job.setReducerClass(MyReducer.class); > job.setOutputKeyClass(Text.class); > job.setOutputValueClass(Text.class); > FileInputFormat.addInputPath(job, new Path("input")); > FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(job, new Path("output")); > System.exit(job.waitForCompletion(true) ? 0 : 1); > } > } > -----------------------------------code > ends----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --000e0cd1389e4a5f35047f17ecea-- From general-return-1022-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 08 16:04:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18354 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2010 16:04:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2010 16:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 78619 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 16:04:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78518 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 16:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78508 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2010 16:04:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:04:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gautam.singaraju@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:03:58 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so5301949gxk.9 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:03:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=defmw3k6rjSBJV9Z+NCuXAN0T4VE7Kr5yNRSmTHoN7w=; b=CcScJ9EjdhMmESJbaO3RQAkSjHPPTxrcI2whmTXQQp31Hj2S7/J/ApIVyk2OzXI6IN CShNWYK8OHQF3+wI5zT1XkjgtGiaiYJLwhHFT4suT1FsO2OpntGUbHZJk9fTteZZgyQ8 pEsXrzFiE+4Q6kd+zYK6tRmKPvemAqUPhbQq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=nINawdRPBBJ4BdXokC/wCKYM99iOl3iXZD2Ea9RcgD/rOLHVxeShFxkq2eQspBbOKB aY6ItOs6fxlx20MWIkb9uCk8xB5pb12pJbcUtEL2Qo2i1zz89rbwTrVY7tpUeY586iHe vwiOvZCaeyv1wWOOGkWrsa7Os9AML5k68zFXM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.120.8 with SMTP id s8mr2038365ybc.127.1265645017208; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:03:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:03:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop on Demand Infrastructure From: Gautam Singaraju To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We are deploying Hadoop on Demand for a university research environment. Due to the nature of infrastructure, where other computationally intensive processes apart from HOD might be running on each machine. Each of this machine has a limited amount of disk storage available. Would large cluster each machine with a single dedicated core be more efficient in comparison to multiple cores on fewer machines? Since it is HOD, I think network IO would be the same for both. Any help would be appreciated. From general-return-1023-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 10 02:32:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39389 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 02:32:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 02:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 23141 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 02:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22988 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 02:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22978 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 02:32:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:32:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zookog@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.189] (HELO mail-iw0-f189.google.com) (209.85.223.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:32:34 +0000 Received: by iwn27 with SMTP id 27so1090907iwn.20 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:32:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=26/91oybHpxMNV72HPx9bDb52S7G1FvtvvNUR34jpyc=; b=xka466AuvCa2ZgyzydHa1rnLWCSRM0gO8r5r3Su94celiv03QhyP5ZrP/K5T9nJN6k dEAR8iT+ICtuZMWV0SM4/GowNaSORCmRyL6Tu5s1wH0nS+VhMW2oWoL/Ut9uxi9VtILZ dkrBwLWJEwljlY/mF+c9uW/1dK7Y9B3jZ844s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LO6aZkmNo4IUzPvkYWLW2Sf34sfCbnkoRjznTyiKo0mdD/pNQrp1oz62HUj3W9ekO6 /nC8KlOLhXkXKHEdVXoJ1TUEH0EsybQ60ezG9N45yxGt8CBOHd1/fvS8Lm5wERLa41HU B7tJ1viAhMjwZfdjWWqtIa1LKCQKqctxoe0CQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.148.83 with SMTP id o19mr502135ibv.39.1265769133137; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:32:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:32:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: announcing Tahoe-LAFS v1.6 From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks: We've just released a new stable release of Tahoe-LAFS. Tahoe-LAFS is an extremely reliable cloud storage system which includes integrated encryption, erasure-coding and digital signatures. I like to think that Tahoe-LAFS is a cloud storage system that "scales up" in terms of the number of people, computers, and organizations that you can connect to your data while maintaining integrity and access-control. There is a Hadoop plugin named hadoop-lafs [1] which makes it possible to use Tahoe-LAFS instead of HDFS. This provides strong security and integrity features as well as erasure-coding (a la HDFS-503 [2]) while maintaining, according to Aaron Cordova's HadoopWorld presentation [3], good performance for at least some uses. The release announcement follows. Regards, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn [1] http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-lafs [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-503 [3] http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B9iCsXQ_HuEpN2NlNDgwMTMtNWRjOC00YzMwLWExYjMtYzVmM2FiZGRhNjA4&hl=en ANNOUNCING Tahoe, the Least-Authority File System, v1.6 We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of version 1.6 of Tahoe-LAFS, an extremely reliable distributed data store. Tahoe-LAFS is the first cloud storage system which offers "provider-independent security" -- meaning that not even your cloud service provider can read or alter your data without your consent. Here is the one-page explanation of its unique security and fault-tolerance properties: http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/about.html Tahoe-LAFS v1.6.0 is the successor to v1.5.0, which was released August 1, 2009 [1]. This release includes major performance improvements, usability improvements, and one major new feature: deep-immutable directories (cryptographically unalterable permanent snapshots). See the NEWS file [2] for details. WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR? With Tahoe-LAFS, you spread your filesystem across multiple servers, and even if some of the servers fail or are taken over by an attacker, the entire filesystem continues to work correctly, and continues to preserve your privacy and security. You can easily and securely share chosen files and directories with others. In addition to the core storage system itself, volunteers have developed related projects to integrate it with other tools. These include frontends for Windows, Macintosh, JavaScript, and iPhone, and plugins for Hadoop, bzr, duplicity, TiddlyWiki, and more. As of this release, contributors have added an Android frontend and a working read-only FUSE frontend. See the Related Projects page on the wiki [3]. We believe that the combination of erasure coding, strong encryption, Free/Open Source Software and careful engineering make Tahoe-LAFS safer than RAID, removable drive, tape, on-line backup or other Cloud storage systems. This software is developed under thorough unit tests, and there are no known bugs or security flaws which would compromise confidentiality or data integrity under normal use. (For all currently known issues please see the known_issues.txt file [4].) COMPATIBILITY This release is fully compatible with the version 1 series of Tahoe-LAFS. Clients from this release can write files and directories in the format used by clients of all versions back to v1.0 (which was released March 25, 2008). Clients from this release can read files and directories produced by clients of all versions since v1.0. Servers from this release can serve clients of all versions back to v1.0 and clients from this release can use servers of all versions back to v1.0. This is the seventh release in the version 1 series. The version 1 series of Tahoe-LAFS will be actively supported and maintained for the forseeable future, and future versions of Tahoe-LAFS will retain the ability to read and write files compatible with Tahoe-LAFS v1. In addition, version 1.6 improves forward-compatibility with planned future directory formats, allowing updates to a directory containing both current and future links, without loss of information. LICENCE You may use this package under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or, at your option, any later version. See the file "COPYING.GPL" [5] for the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2. You may use this package under the Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, version 1 or, at your option, any later version. (The Transitive Grace Period Public Licence has requirements similar to the GPL except that it allows you to wait for up to twelve months after you redistribute a derived work before releasing the source code of your derived work.) See the file "COPYING.TGPPL.html" [6] for the terms of the Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, version 1. (You may choose to use this package under the terms of either licence, at your option.) INSTALLATION Tahoe-LAFS works on Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Cygwin, Solaris, *BSD, and probably most other systems. Start with "docs/install.html" [7]. HACKING AND COMMUNITY Please join us on the mailing list [8]. Patches are gratefully accepted -- the RoadMap page [9] shows the next improvements that we plan to make and CREDITS [10] lists the names of people who've contributed to the project. The Dev page [11] contains resources for hackers. SPONSORSHIP Tahoe-LAFS was originally developed thanks to the sponsorship of Allmydata, Inc. [12], a provider of commercial backup services. Allmydata founded the Tahoe-LAFS project and contributed hardware, software, ideas, bug reports, suggestions, demands, and they employed several Tahoe-LAFS hackers and instructed them to spend part of their work time on this Free Software project. Also they awarded customized t-shirts to hackers who found security flaws in Tahoe-LAFS (see the Hack Tahoe-LAFS Hall Of Fame [13]). After discontinuing funding of Tahoe-LAFS R&D in early 2009, Allmydata, Inc. has continued to provide servers, co-lo space, bandwidth, and small personal gifts as tokens of appreciation. (Also they continue to provide bug reports.) Thank you to Allmydata, Inc. for their generous and public-spirited support. This is the third release of Tahoe-LAFS to be created solely as a labor of love by volunteers. Thank you very much to the dedicated team of "hackers in the public interest" who make Tahoe-LAFS possible. Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn on behalf of the Tahoe-LAFS team February 1, 2010 Boulder, Colorado, USA [1] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/browser/relnotes.txt?rev=4042 [2] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/browser/NEWS?rev=4189 [3] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/RelatedProjects [4] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/browser/docs/known_issues.txt [5] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/browser/COPYING.GPL [6] http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk/COPYING.TGPPL.html [7] http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/install.html [8] http://allmydata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev [9] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/roadmap [10] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/browser/CREDITS?rev=4186 [11] http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/Dev [12] http://allmydata.com [13] http://hacktahoe.org From general-return-1024-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 10 23:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48401 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 23:07:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 23:07:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 97500 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 23:07:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97426 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 23:07:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97416 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 23:07:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:07:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:07:34 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-154-213.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c194.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.194]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1AN5lLw057406 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:05:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=NZ4kpy/hyFjBYhNXa5y/wjEwQoCgct+ROZsYMyJsbm0FmxqTkB+XtQvT1BWtSJ1W Message-Id: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:05:47 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org PMC, I've rolled a release candidate for 0.20.2 and uploaded it to http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ . Please download it and test it out. Thanks, Owen From general-return-1025-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 11 06:52:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35067 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 06:52:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 06:52:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 70236 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 06:52:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70125 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 06:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70115 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2010 06:52:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:52:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.181] (HELO mail-pz0-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:51:56 +0000 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so1132986pzk.30 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:51:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.250.3 with SMTP id x3mr877922wfh.347.1265871096143; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:51:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> References: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:51:16 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002102251w1b84594bq84c232f218b09acc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -0 on this particular tarball (md5sum 9759e01d7426c9bbe14758bf9ab69012). Trying to compile from the tarball with ant -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue -Dlibhdfs=3Dtrue bin-package I ran into these issues on my karmic box at home: 1) The configure scripts are not all executable. BUILD FAILED /tmp/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:1418: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Can= not r un program "/tmp/hadoop-0.20.2/src/c++/pipes/configure" (in directory "/tmp= /hado op-0.20.2/build/c++-build/Linux-amd64-64/pipes"): java.io.IOException: erro= r=3D13, Permission denied I applied HADOOP-5612 to fix this, though I think creating a tarball after chmod 755ing the configure scripts would also be correct. Buildfile: build.xml 2) native build failed due to missing header includes in c++ code I applied the patches from HADOOP-5611 and MAPREDUCE-1251 to get past this These same problems are present as seen in the branch-20 Hudson build: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-20-Build/67/console 3) It would be nice if the tarball had libhdfs included in c++/lib in addition to the pipes libraries. libhdfs wasn't in 0.20.1 either, though, so I don't think it's a big deal. If you end up doing a rebuild, people would probably be happy to see -Dlibhdfs=3Dtrue in the release. I say -0 instead of -1 because none of these issues are regressions from 0.20.1. When we did 0.20.1 we didn't notice some all of these, since several are problems that only show up on some newer distros (like karmic). Since we're doing a new release, and the patches apply cleanly and are pretty trivial, I think we should include them. Thanks -Todd On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > PMC, > =A0 =A0I've rolled a release candidate for 0.20.2 and uploaded it to > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/. Please download it and test it > out. > > Thanks, > =A0 Owen > From general-return-1026-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 11 17:00:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67409 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 17:00:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 17:00:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 94108 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:00:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94048 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:00:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94031 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2010 17:00:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.211] (HELO QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:47 +0000 Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gejH1d00B1HzFnQ5Bh0Txp; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:27 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gh0H1d00F2SbwD53ah0Ldr; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:00:25 +0000 Message-Id: <88756F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002102251w1b84594bq84c232f218b09acc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-21--162391534 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:00:17 -0800 References: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> <45f85f71002102251w1b84594bq84c232f218b09acc@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-21--162391534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > I applied HADOOP-5612 to fix this, though I think creating a tarball > after chmod 755ing the configure scripts would also be correct. *Sigh* You can't blame a release for not containing one of your patches, if you didn't ask for it to be applied to the relevant branch. If you want it to be included in the next 0.20 release, reopen the jira and ask for it to be applied back to branch-0.20. > These same problems are present as seen in the branch-20 Hudson build: > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-20-Build/67/console The problem on Hudson seems to be that automake 1.9 is not installed. That seems like a different issue. > 3) It would be nice if the tarball had libhdfs included in c++/lib It does have the .so for libhdfs. hadoop-0.20.2/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhdfs.so I assume you were looking for the 64 bit version. Did someone get the 64 bit libhdfs working? If so, we should update the HowToRelease twiki to include it. -- Owen --Apple-Mail-21--162391534-- From general-return-1027-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 11 17:18:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78294 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 17:18:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 17:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27325 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27243 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27233 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2010 17:18:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:18:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:18:46 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=lYXBd5kUjvpraeQkRE3XCp4PZQWNwo/wkzSSUN4lDNVtYpRZUdLjTu1t GJrdjE5Hzcfm8qJ/KzEzJowFHIuLavpic+Q4eiYsqAygi7ZQMAisBy40p nX7HjOdGJ/b9LcG; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1265908726; x=1297444726; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[VOTE]=20Release=20candidate=20for=20Ha doop=200.20.2|Date:=20Thu,=2011=20Feb=202010=2009:18:00 =20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=20 1.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<887 56F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org>; bh=pwHhgnkRxCdCveEAg641hjNmGHYcCiyX75I3O3tV+Ss=; b=tZ5RtirpqldE+xKIZj+o8GyLqUnOKHzd2U8+mI30bGtKqL2D6INP68/I cSljqY/Z2Z9g4aP8pW3a1CG5h3fJBAc9rkYnXomJNgSAy73WjxsFtdxru 29KsrRW0z8FtZ2Z; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,453,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11162974" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:18:04 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:18:00 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 Thread-Index: AcqrPikjdG6pJwJeg0enhiq5WmWxyg== In-Reply-To: <88756F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/11/10 9:00 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >> These same problems are present as seen in the branch-20 Hudson build: >> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-20-Build/67/console > > The problem on Hudson seems to be that automake 1.9 is not installed. > That seems like a different issue. [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc: In function 'uint64_t HadoopUtils::getCurrentMillis()': [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc:74: error: 'strerror' was not declared in this scope [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc: In function 'std::string HadoopUtils::quoteString(const std::string&, const char*)': [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc:103: error: 'strchr' was not declared in this scope [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc: In function 'std::string HadoopUtils::unquoteString(const std::string&)': [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-20-Build/trunk/src/c++/utils/im pl/StringUtils.cc:144: error: 'strtol' was not declared in this scope ... has more to do with missing string header files than automake. :) > >> 3) It would be nice if the tarball had libhdfs included in c++/lib > > It does have the .so for libhdfs. > > hadoop-0.20.2/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhdfs.so > > I assume you were looking for the 64 bit version. Did someone get the > 64 bit libhdfs working? If so, we should update the HowToRelease twiki > to include it. > > -- Owen From general-return-1028-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 11 17:21:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79472 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 34294 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34227 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 17:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34217 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2010 17:21:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:21:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:21:23 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so311211qwb.35 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:21:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.36 with SMTP id y36mr98917wfi.160.1265908862164; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:21:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <88756F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org> References: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> <45f85f71002102251w1b84594bq84c232f218b09acc@mail.gmail.com> <88756F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:20:42 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002110920r567d73e1n7ab649f01bba72dc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> I applied HADOOP-5612 to fix this, though I think creating a tarball >> after chmod 755ing the configure scripts would also be correct. > > *Sigh* You can't blame a release for not containing one of your patches, = if > you didn't ask for it to be applied to the relevant branch. If you want i= t > to be included in the next 0.20 release, reopen the jira and ask for it t= o > be applied back to branch-0.20. > Yes, I should have asked at the time to put it in 20. I had newly started working on Hadoop when I did that patch and didn't know the proper JIRA protocol at the time. Will do so now. Like I said in my mail, I'm not trying to block a release. I'm just reporting the errors I ran into trying to use the release candidate - if the rest of the community or PMC thinks it's not worth rolling a new one, I'll leave it up to them. Regardless, it has nothing to do with whether it's "my patch" - I think it reflects poorly on the project when the releases fail to build on a common system configuration. >> These same problems are present as seen in the branch-20 Hudson build: >> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-20-Build/67/console > > The problem on Hudson seems to be that automake 1.9 is not installed. Tha= t > seems like a different issue. > automake should not be a build time requirement for released artifacts in pretty much any sane project. autotools "make dist" targets always include a configure script, which means automake was already run by the developer. After applying the patches mentioned above that fix missing header includes, I built just fine on my box that has no automake-1.9. >> 3) It would be nice if the tarball had libhdfs included in c++/lib > > It does have the .so for libhdfs. > > =A0hadoop-0.20.2/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhdfs.so > > I assume you were looking for the 64 bit version. Did someone get the 64 = bit > libhdfs working? If so, we should update the HowToRelease twiki to includ= e > it. After applying the patches I mentioned, the ant command quoted above succeeded in building libhdfs just fine: build/c++/Linux-amd64-64/lib/libhdfs.so.0.0.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped If others think these are blockers, I'm happy to roll a new candidate tarball later this week once they've been pushed into branch-20. Although I don't have a binding vote in the release process, I am pretty sure the ASF policies are fine with anyone rolling an rc and calling a vote. If no one else thinks these patches are worth stalling for, that's fine too. Thanks -Todd From general-return-1029-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 12 10:42:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42792 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2010 10:42:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2010 10:42:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 46650 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2010 10:42:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46542 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2010 10:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46532 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2010 10:42:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:42:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:42:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 42627 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2010 10:41:43 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f209.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:41:43 +0000 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so1881131bwz.32 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:41:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.138.81 with SMTP id z17mr753601bkt.49.1265971301412; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:41:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002110920r567d73e1n7ab649f01bba72dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <6800345F-07A4-4824-BDC2-87023707A793@yahoo-inc.com> <45f85f71002102251w1b84594bq84c232f218b09acc@mail.gmail.com> <88756F25-FCA8-475B-8E97-F2821911B7CA@apache.org> <45f85f71002110920r567d73e1n7ab649f01bba72dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:41:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002120241u78569b05v2bc9b3b60cca2077@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Hadoop 0.20.2 From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I committed HADOOP-5611 to 0.20 and MAPREDUCE-1251 to 0.21 and 0.20. I am suggesting slight modifications to HADOOP-5612 but think it should also be included (btw: the original patch was *not* licensed to the ASF; if the author re-posts the patch with permission granted, would that be sufficient?). A backport of MAPREDUCE-623 should also be applied to 0.20; the javac warnings are pretty ugly, if benign. None of these issues are critical, though; if no other issues are found with this RC, I'm +1 on releasing it, but would like to include these if another candidate is rolled. -C On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> >> On Feb 10, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> I applied HADOOP-5612 to fix this, though I think creating a tarball >>> after chmod 755ing the configure scripts would also be correct. >> >> *Sigh* You can't blame a release for not containing one of your patches,= if >> you didn't ask for it to be applied to the relevant branch. If you want = it >> to be included in the next 0.20 release, reopen the jira and ask for it = to >> be applied back to branch-0.20. >> > > Yes, I should have asked at the time to put it in 20. I had newly > started working on Hadoop when I did that patch and didn't know the > proper JIRA protocol at the time. Will do so now. Like I said in my > mail, I'm not trying to block a release. I'm just reporting the errors > I ran into trying to use the release candidate - if the rest of the > community or PMC thinks it's not worth rolling a new one, I'll leave > it up to them. > > Regardless, it has nothing to do with whether it's "my patch" - I > think it reflects poorly on the project when the releases fail to > build on a common system configuration. > >>> These same problems are present as seen in the branch-20 Hudson build: >>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-20-Build/67/console >> >> The problem on Hudson seems to be that automake 1.9 is not installed. Th= at >> seems like a different issue. >> > > automake should not be a build time requirement for released artifacts > in pretty much any sane project. autotools "make dist" targets always > include a configure script, which means automake was already run by > the developer. After applying the patches mentioned above that fix > missing header includes, I built just fine on my box that has no > automake-1.9. > >>> 3) It would be nice if the tarball had libhdfs included in c++/lib >> >> It does have the .so for libhdfs. >> >> =A0hadoop-0.20.2/c++/Linux-i386-32/lib/libhdfs.so >> >> I assume you were looking for the 64 bit version. Did someone get the 64= bit >> libhdfs working? If so, we should update the HowToRelease twiki to inclu= de >> it. > > After applying the patches I mentioned, the ant command quoted above > succeeded in building libhdfs just fine: > build/c++/Linux-amd64-64/lib/libhdfs.so.0.0.0: ELF 64-bit LSB shared > object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped > > > If others think these are blockers, I'm happy to roll a new candidate > tarball later this week once they've been pushed into branch-20. > Although I don't have a binding vote in the release process, I am > pretty sure the ASF policies are fine with anyone rolling an rc and > calling a vote. If no one else thinks these patches are worth stalling > for, that's fine too. > > Thanks > -Todd > From general-return-1030-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 16 19:23:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13766 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2010 19:23:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2010 19:23:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 19:23:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4263 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 19:23:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4247 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2010 19:23:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:23:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:23:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.198] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c242.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.242]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1GJMq2E000778 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:22:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=WfQoZ4pKrUiL4bOb4nguExsLGWme53ljPv4Z09VJaG8aYDQanPdXfpNxl8x/8e0I Message-Id: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:22:52 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) All, I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ A description of what is new and different in this release is included in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that directory. Please download the candidate, test it, and vote. Alan. From general-return-1031-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 16 22:12:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83417 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2010 22:12:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2010 22:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 77370 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 22:12:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77290 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2010 22:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77280 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2010 22:12:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:12:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:12:30 +0000 Received: by pva18 with SMTP id 18so8681pva.35 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:12:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.210.17 with SMTP id i17mr4761838wfg.146.1266358328332; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:12:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:12:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey guys, What are the current plans for the 21 release? The roadmap on the wiki [1] says "minor releases are made regularly, every few months." The 21 branch was created 5 months ago, and the release dates in jira for the various core projects have all passed. I know some projects, eg HBase, would like to get users on more recent bits. What are the next steps for rolling a release? Thanks, Eli [1] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap From general-return-1032-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 17 00:13:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37449 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2010 00:13:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2010 00:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 22300 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 00:13:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22237 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 00:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22227 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2010 00:13:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:13:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 37348 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2010 00:13:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.104]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:13:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7B349B.1090106@apache.org> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:13:15 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.3.0 (RC 0)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI, a release vote has started on avro-dev. Please vote on that list, not here. Thanks, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.3.0 (RC 0) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:07:49 -0800 From: Doug Cutting Reply-To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a candidate build for Avro release 1.3.0. In this release: - the Avro file format has been revised and simplified; - the source tree and release artifacts have been restructured; - the Python port has been largely rewritten; - the C port is now considerably more complete, supporting data files; - a Ruby port has been added, supporting data files and RPC. Please download, test, and vote by 19 February. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.3.0-RC0/ Thanks, Doug From general-return-1033-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 01:25:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22062 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 01:25:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 01:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 73709 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 01:25:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73622 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 01:25:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73612 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 01:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.96] (HELO qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:29 +0000 Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jD4d1d00317UAYkA9DR9sb; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:09 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jDR01d00K2SbwD58ZDR2hu; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:06 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:24:59 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the branch. Please try it out and vote. http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ -- Owen From general-return-1034-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 03:29:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68200 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 03:29:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 03:29:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 41377 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 03:29:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41220 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 03:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41210 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 03:29:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:29:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:28:57 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so3944883pzk.2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:28:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.100.5 with SMTP id c5mr5945836rvm.3.1266463716250; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:28:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:28:16 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002171928w1e8aeba7u4562f8255871b61c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Owen, Thanks for rolling the second rc! Looks like that file needs a chmod, getting 404 Forbidden: [todd@minotaur:/home/omalley/public_html/0.20.2]$ ls -l total 40664 -rw-r----- 1 omalley omalley 41662994 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 omalley omalley 195 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz.asc -rw-r--r-- 1 omalley omalley 1034 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz.mds -Todd On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the branch. > Please try it out and vote. > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ > > -- Owen > From general-return-1035-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 04:10:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76643 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 04:10:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 04:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 65273 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 04:10:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65100 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 04:10:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65090 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 04:10:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:10:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:10:11 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1185207qwi.35 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:09:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U1nCQIbFvdjJJmWZ6CJWfhQ1UIjzB8NQPvkZQhHrF5g=; b=VSR+9Rs+m9Xxxu5WpyI+zqJdtEoSdpjxtW7xmL7NjnZrILwgf5enjQ6QSeZ49irPm6 OAyVFhvbNN8EEitkVVJuk4xEiJuMqbchtd1EoWHzbh+d13+0Vll2y4CBj3n33vLrt4Tm mHOEHHJ2xKlNmh1YyxQ7Gwpj9l01Uz7dA6hzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=f87MWOa8V1OWFuRMvJudSC5aRac99VZyoIIc7/RK75kkTp8uHxkRKxVvdvZgKemnsh UrocvbBzV/qPr/nz68biU3vJLC7UhXMvjy3+qQPX+eCFaPDweLq6Mf0x3dUJRpztVQ00 Cpxj750IOxsmaYJ7v/Xaek8dmgfztdQ9xhP4Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.241.82 with SMTP id ld18mr676392qcb.60.1266466189929; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:09:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002171928w1e8aeba7u4562f8255871b61c@mail.gmail.com> References: <45f85f71002171928w1e8aeba7u4562f8255871b61c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:09:49 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8b8d134678cb853b Message-ID: <7c962aed1002172009g1a4d4978v472c16d1c2bdcf6b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, me too... $ wget http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz --04:09:10-- http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz Resolving people.apache.org... 140.211.11.9 Connecting to people.apache.org|140.211.11.9|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 04:09:10 ERROR 403: Forbidden. St.Ack On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Owen, > > Thanks for rolling the second rc! > > Looks like that file needs a chmod, getting 404 Forbidden: > > [todd@minotaur:/home/omalley/public_html/0.20.2]$ ls -l > total 40664 > -rw-r----- =A01 omalley =A0omalley =A041662994 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.20.2= .tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- =A01 omalley =A0omalley =A0 =A0 =A0 195 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.= 20.2.tar.gz.asc > -rw-r--r-- =A01 omalley =A0omalley =A0 =A0 =A01034 Feb 18 01:21 hadoop-0.= 20.2.tar.gz.mds > > -Todd > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the branc= h. >> Please try it out and vote. >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-1036-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 05:59:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4686 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 05:59:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 05:59:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11531 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 05:59:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11337 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 05:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11327 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 05:59:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:59:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:59:36 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4092863pzk.2 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nn6ZFHCg5QrcLOT05QT9z4tOxsAMUaT5tULrgsiMSJk=; b=j+OOYUNk4vyGshbUQxRhEii19VPqk/EKme7x65ZcaHWfB6p29ZTZdQASUhRuWU654p K87yM7m6eJzIjnBNc8jtefO8Ju1iIaMq+xCNtTW2kQtqZnJwEb9wvbN8wPrivWbnZr7w IyQo6jRQiJk9Ehu6lWlmb1+WL7EOGR9TpecrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=a9DYrAXNKPCEcuIbkuR55Bjkpw3gsP7XZ6xSXJksRNQq6RRH2yWRmOc9Tc+6twA0Tc xaKlksgOYeIIxSmN0f5Sg5b2XLd3JzBuJMi6PGEBuCJYWEGFEhaMVCMhoJeA5GiQoKk1 PN3DsSka5lZ6tfIhVSgahKGlElh6ZEHjqRauk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.23.12 with SMTP id a12mr6052830rvj.161.1266472755302; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002172009g1a4d4978v472c16d1c2bdcf6b@mail.gmail.com> References: <45f85f71002171928w1e8aeba7u4562f8255871b61c@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002172009g1a4d4978v472c16d1c2bdcf6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:15 -0800 Message-ID: <5f7f740b1002172159x4792d7e0n1999def6f8998d04@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1708eb2932d047fd9aae0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1708eb2932d047fd9aae0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok, the permission problem should be fixed. Please try now. -- Owen --000e0cd1708eb2932d047fd9aae0-- From general-return-1037-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 07:22:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41579 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 07:22:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 07:22:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 56049 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 07:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55998 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 07:22:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55988 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 07:22:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:22:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:22:18 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so316295pwi.35 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:21:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.106.13 with SMTP id i13mr6103647rvm.179.1266477717176; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:21:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b1002172159x4792d7e0n1999def6f8998d04@mail.gmail.com> References: <45f85f71002171928w1e8aeba7u4562f8255871b61c@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002172009g1a4d4978v472c16d1c2bdcf6b@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b1002172159x4792d7e0n1999def6f8998d04@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:21:37 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002172321q6b30b4dax20a95080659d3d3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All good. +1 from me: - Verified Owen's GPG signature - Verified the md5 sum 7b0ae9bbeb5bc932ad028932d5e7b5d5 - Unpacked, built java and native code both on 64-bit, karmic - Started a pseudodistributed cluster and ran a couple of sleep jobs. The only one tiny complaint is that there is still no 64-bit libhdfs. But if there was an issue with that it's no big deal. In case any crypto-happy people care, here's my signature on the tarball: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkt86kwACgkQXkPKua7Hfq/ujwCfeu6pD7PwD9RtGbTHiXmlf+bp 4I8AoM/fv8q6ejJbxy9ApyB3RBXVpfNd =V8Qd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thanks again for the release work -Todd On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, the permission problem should be fixed. Please try now. > > -- Owen > From general-return-1038-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 09:06:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66632 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 09:06:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 09:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 62098 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 09:06:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62013 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 09:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62003 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 09:06:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:06:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:06:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 66591 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 09:06:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-fx0-f218.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:06:01 +0000 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so8554211fxm.29 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:05:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.84 with SMTP id f20mr449372bka.209.1266483959261; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:05:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:05:59 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002180105y5339e19elf9712ed719a6500e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org *sigh* The tests currently do not compile. HADOOP-6506 added a call in the build: + which does not exist in 0.20. -C On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the branch. > Please try it out and vote. > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ > > -- Owen > From general-return-1039-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 09:17:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70193 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 09:17:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 09:17:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 74743 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 09:17:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74673 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 09:17:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74663 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 09:17:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 70166 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 09:17:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:01 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so729515fga.11 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:16:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.14.84 with SMTP id f20mr451398bka.209.1266484619130; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:16:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002180105y5339e19elf9712ed719a6500e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002180105y5339e19elf9712ed719a6500e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:16:59 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002180116n32c7d0d6ucc5b9342dfc9da1b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Filed HADOOP-6575. On the bright side, MAPREDUCE-623 can also be part of this release. -C On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > *sigh* The tests currently do not compile. HADOOP-6506 added a call in > the build: > > + =A0 =A0 > > which does not exist in 0.20. -C > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the branc= h. >> Please try it out and vote. >> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-1040-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 18:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62480 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 18:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 18:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 34213 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 18:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34136 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 18:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34126 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 18:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:55:14 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so47117qwi.35 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8p7y8MzY0YXx1YMBzhL4ZX0s3qQgxOAl/JiLxafkTvQ=; b=l9PpKDuNyCGebvzKwIl3VTjbmxoIpTuGmYE39e7uAzWQxGL3YQtb8K9qFLq2RWeA+5 5EG1e92pr7hlqzO3Zcn3DI6ZPKxcLpPx4v7xD6uW+OxlrlF1HD50NisKI+sjFL038dJf und001pmqgv17Q30XK51usBWtQh4Z2tMfOC8Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TNC4mGoKR5Y4429w3tpW6VwoXUM6NRBniWhmPlCboxYeFZrnsoyQnXQr9X1LKNs3R+ 0a2xSEq1AqYLY8vMum8sR5kWxn9t/+9uhTAewMSxx1ajDuLIHU/1a4s7chH1ZC3OLrMl qXqnj8JOU4a7tH6s7ykl6xUC1BiCPDjziTUZU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.224.133 with SMTP id io5mr2512668qcb.37.1266519292660; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:54:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 90f555ea047c51b9 Message-ID: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey guys, > > What are the current plans for the 21 release? > Doesn't seem like there is much interest going by the deafening silence Eli. Did it come up last night at the HUG? > The roadmap on the wiki [1] says "minor releases are made regularly, > every few months." The 21 branch was created 5 months ago, and the > release dates in jira for the various core projects have all passed. I > know some projects, eg HBase, would like to get users on more recent > bits. What are the next steps for rolling a release? > Taking a look at blockers -- assuming to make a release, we just need to clear blockers and roll a candidate -- it seems like common/core and hdfs have but a few but mapreduce has a bunch. Too many. Does anyone detect activity in the blocker issues? I've not made a review. Perhaps someone already has? St.Ack From general-return-1041-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 19:29:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80160 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 19:29:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 79087 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79009 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78999 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:28:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:28:52 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4913085pzk.2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.62.34 with SMTP id k34mr6672885wfa.282.1266521311896; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:28:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> What are the current plans for the 21 release? >> > Doesn't seem like there is much interest going by the deafening silence E= li. > > Did it come up last night at the HUG? > It did, Owen gave an update in his talk and there was some follow on discussion. The question of whether it makes sense to rebase 21 on trunk came up, since 21 has gotten really out of date since it was branched. What do you and others think of rebasing the 21 branch on trunk once security is feature complete next month, and then targeting an initial release a month after that? The rationale being that 21 branch is old, has not been getting the backports it needs, and the community should be releasing relatively recent bits. In the mean time we can focus on 21/trunk blockers. It doesn't look like there are a ton more trunk blockers than 21 blockers. I know people, HBase in particular, have been waiting for a 21 release for a while so delaying further is a pain, and we should consider rolling what we've got, the hope would be that the 21 branch would be more widely useful if it has more recent features and fixes. >> The roadmap on the wiki [1] says "minor releases are made regularly, >> every few months." The 21 branch was created 5 months ago, and the >> release dates in jira for the various core projects have all passed. I >> know some projects, eg HBase, would like to get users on more recent >> bits. What are the next steps for rolling a release? >> > > Taking a look at blockers -- assuming to make a release, we just need > to clear blockers and roll a candidate -- it seems like common/core > and hdfs have but a few but mapreduce has a bunch. =A0Too many. > > Does anyone detect activity in the blocker issues? =A0I've not made a > review. =A0Perhaps someone already has? A decent number of the MR ones are patch available and quite a few others are documentation related, nothing too scary. The core/hdfs ones are pretty doable. We should make another pass to confirm that they're all actually blockers. I'm happy to start working on the blockers if that will help push the release forward. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1042-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 19:29:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80275 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 19:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 80021 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79948 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79938 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:29:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 80242 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 19:29:08 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:29:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:29:07 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli Collins wrote: > What are the current plans for the 21 release? Personally, I'd rather re-branch 21 from trunk in early March. I believe Y!'s security changes will be feature-complete in trunk by then. Symlinks and end-to-end Avro should also hopefully be committed by then. I'd then propose we roll a 0.21.0 (alpha) release one month later, in early April. Henceforth, I'd like to see the project: - set branch dates at 6-month intervals - roll alpha releases one month after branch dates - roll bugfix releases as needed thereafter At the onset of each six-month period we'd also need to decide what sort of release we'll make, major or minor. (Minor releases allow new features, but remove no deprecated APIs. Only major releases are permitted to remove previously deprecated APIs. All pre-1.0 releases are major.) We'd also designate a release master for each release, to drive the process: making the branches, rolling the artifacts, and calling the votes, etc. Do we have any release master candidate volunteers for 0.21? Doug From general-return-1043-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 21:19:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32717 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 21:19:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 21:19:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 72612 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:19:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72524 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:19:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72514 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 21:19:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:19:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:18:52 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=DHwtvFb+imPRbdyYikUmjPOZWUd6VEgK7SbW8TAgN1fkNOx33ikZWVC7 +ZYqfH+NEKlcFK3gf6fDgkmAQTHVDSAEWBdu7u4GFkb3ntbDAAXi/Ekg1 EQtwuTpL8QLZHkj; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1266527932; x=1298063932; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Release=20plans|Date:=20Thu,=2018=20Feb =202010=2013:17:50=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit |In-Reply-To:=20<4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org>; bh=O3INq+T8onxNfkx6hZ4VLBGrKRjgof+n5I6Zsqk0PaY=; b=qNInKnQLSqJmdnyxEZjtumMWNDavSjxew8ppcujkJHqvbvVCbPiiQHYt wlAEVNfCu1qqzCodxqdLt01/HA2cn7JS1B/hm6+40Oxup3FN3TXfhpcyz UyEjwXIR/JXiuaS; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,499,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11280471" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:17:53 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:17:50 -0800 Subject: Re: Release plans From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Release plans Thread-Index: Acqw39MjJ7pdek8Y0EqS482uI4MRsg== In-Reply-To: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/18/10 11:29 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: >> What are the current plans for the 21 release? > > Personally, I'd rather re-branch 21 from trunk in early March. I > believe Y!'s security changes will be feature-complete in trunk by then. > Symlinks and end-to-end Avro should also hopefully be committed by then. > > I'd then propose we roll a 0.21.0 (alpha) release one month later, in > early April. +1 From general-return-1044-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 21:28:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36576 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 21:28:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 21:28:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 83987 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:28:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83919 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:28:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83909 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 21:28:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:28:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:28:39 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so1565788ywh.2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:28:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JlcNVoALLI1p67VP5vjJo0sY4+X2n+OWKbJJqDXuqQU=; b=rw/4FPU9bVnDBnvzUhl2rmPl/NCzM+7/BgD7z3FMBFT3EQAP1vk8dHAp2FN+r7y1FG pLOAIQwPqB+n4q5j/u9h34b0n1GLvehazAPrHydBwuWvfRKJdMs8GxrUwERZaMqZtXx2 S0KScsNY+XgE1K8PLsKeBSvcySoXGvXIQ7xl0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ketPgAkjFw6pMk+TaUatzeImv0F7o98TrD1HVmug2ZfIvHvfFfFe9XfLS3bYf1XFzX 0UKoVdwOqjRTjZX6Jc7peBpIlaIuj5lFyXCzHRmE6l+pljX9OgcH4C8WiqmcqFkgciGA wbs9g3iPahJEOpZhlLhIfXw29y25ysySfFGts= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.241.41 with SMTP id o41mr14644910ybh.68.1266528498601; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:28:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:28:18 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb71002181328l5e40037eo891b1cda4288cd9c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd51bca41cdf5047fe6a52c --000e0cd51bca41cdf5047fe6a52c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have seen/heard about people using the 0.21 branch. Won't it disturbing to them that a new 0.21 branch that they might sync to in the future will have a whole bunch of new code/features that they were not testing with earlier? I thought that there is some benefit in rolling a 0.22 sometime in the future and then marking 0.21 as "not for production usage". thanks, dhruba On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: > >> What are the current plans for the 21 release? >> > > Personally, I'd rather re-branch 21 from trunk in early March. I believe > Y!'s security changes will be feature-complete in trunk by then. Symlinks > and end-to-end Avro should also hopefully be committed by then. > > I'd then propose we roll a 0.21.0 (alpha) release one month later, in early > April. > > Henceforth, I'd like to see the project: > - set branch dates at 6-month intervals > - roll alpha releases one month after branch dates > - roll bugfix releases as needed thereafter > > At the onset of each six-month period we'd also need to decide what sort of > release we'll make, major or minor. (Minor releases allow new features, but > remove no deprecated APIs. Only major releases are permitted to remove > previously deprecated APIs. All pre-1.0 releases are major.) > > We'd also designate a release master for each release, to drive the > process: making the branches, rolling the artifacts, and calling the votes, > etc. Do we have any release master candidate volunteers for 0.21? > > Doug > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd51bca41cdf5047fe6a52c-- From general-return-1045-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 21:55:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53360 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 21:55:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 21:55:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 36080 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:55:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36007 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 21:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35997 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 21:55:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:55:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.80] (HELO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:55:30 +0000 Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jTHZ1d0011HpZEsA8ZvAG2; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:55:10 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jZv21d0032SbwD58aZv4L8; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:55:08 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:55:00 -0800 References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: My presentation basically said that: * Yahoo is currently running Yahoo's 0.20.8 on all 25,000 of our nodes. * We have made substantial numbers of feature back ports from trunk into our branch. Including: * improved Capacity scheduler * run MapReduce tasks as the real user * Hadoop 0.21 isn't stable yet and still has 28 blockers. * Furthermore, there are missing back ports that have been fixed in trunk but not 0.21. * We have a very tight timeline for adding security, which we can't slip * feature complete in february * deploy to first integration cluster in april * completely deployed on all clusters in august * To reduce risk, we are back porting security in to a branch of Yahoo's 0.20 branch. * By the time we are ready for the next version after security, the current 0.21 will be too stale to be interesting * So Yahoo will probably skip straight from Yahoo 0.20 with security to 0.22 in 2011. * Someone outside of Yahoo needs to step up and start addressing the blockers to get 0.21 released. > Personally, I'd rather re-branch 21 from trunk in early March. Rather than set a date, I think it is time to move to feature-based releases. We'd need to vote on the feature set, but looking for security, end-to-end avro, and symlinks seems like a reasonable list. That will avoid the large rush of commits the last week of the deadline, which has been counter productive. -- Owen From general-return-1046-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 23:06:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92960 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 23:06:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 23:06:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29027 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:06:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28959 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:06:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28949 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 23:06:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:06:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:06:26 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so110313qwi.35 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.112.2 with SMTP id u2mr5136828qcp.0.1266534364701; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023544714c0e77794047fe8025d --0023544714c0e77794047fe8025d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > * Someone outside of Yahoo needs to step up and start addressing the > blockers to get 0.21 released. > Thanks for the update on the state of the world at Yahoo!, Owen--very helpful. I think the community will step up to knock down some of the blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the current branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on that front? Rather than set a date, I think it is time to move to feature-based > releases. We'd need to vote on the feature set, but looking for security, > end-to-end avro, and symlinks seems like a reasonable list. That will avoid > the large rush of commits the last week of the deadline, which has been > counter productive. > Could someone give an example of a successful open source project that follows a feature-based release cycle? From the research I've done, the regular drumbeat of time-based releases seem to be more conducive to project health. Always interested to hear otherwise. The example Owen cites of "the large rush of commits the last week of the deadline" is certainly a good argument in favor of feature-based releases; I'm curious to hear more. Thanks, Jeff --0023544714c0e77794047fe8025d-- From general-return-1047-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 23:19:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96640 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 23:19:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 23:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59568 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59512 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59502 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 23:19:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:19:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:18:57 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1INI5pn009485 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:18:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=DCm+MW1pr3aU4I66DBMcgj6vrXOJrEnnuIbrmkMmQP4EI4f5UT9F3XvKQd3n13W1 Message-Id: <82FD77AF-E1E2-49E2-8641-35C8697B8973@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:18:05 -0800 References: <7c962aed1002181054w3cdb9302y93f607f3b53f0d18@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Stack wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Collins >> wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> What are the current plans for the 21 release? >>> >> Doesn't seem like there is much interest going by the deafening >> silence Eli. >> >> Did it come up last night at the HUG? >> > > It did, Owen gave an update in his talk and there was some follow on > discussion. The question of whether it makes sense to rebase 21 on > trunk came up, since 21 has gotten really out of date since it was > branched. What do you and others think of rebasing the 21 branch on > trunk once security is feature complete next month, and then targeting > an initial release a month after that? The rationale being that 21 > branch is old, has not been getting the backports it needs, and the > community should be releasing relatively recent bits. In the mean time > we can focus on 21/trunk blockers. It doesn't look like there are a > ton more trunk blockers than 21 blockers. I know people, HBase in > particular, have been waiting for a 21 release for a while so delaying > further is a pain, and we should consider rolling what we've got, the > hope would be that the 21 branch would be more widely useful if it has > more recent features and fixes. If the community want the append features fast then we are better off using the original 21 branch. Basing a 21 off trunk will mean that there are more features with a new set of blockers and and hence will take longer to fix. sanjay From general-return-1048-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 18 23:21:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97246 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 23:21:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 23:21:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 61990 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61920 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 23:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61910 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 23:21:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:21:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:20:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 97194 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 23:20:37 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:20:37 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7DCB44.20506@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:20:36 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Owen O'Malley wrote: > Rather than set a date, I think it is time to move to feature-based > releases. The problem with feature-based releases is that one feature can delay releases arbitrarily, so a single feature can hold all others hostage. Rather I think we need to be willing to remove or disable a feature in a branch if it proves problematic. If an addition causes regressions that are not resolved promptly then that addition might be removed or disabled. This levels the playing field: features that doesn't cause regressions can be made available in a release in a timely, predictable manner and are not held back by more problematic features. Doug From general-return-1049-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:02:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34902 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:02:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:02:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 66726 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:02:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66650 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66640 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:02:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:02:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:02:36 +0000 Received: from omta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jQEo1d0020SCNGk51d2Gdz; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:02:16 +0000 Received: from [172.21.155.74] ([209.131.62.146]) by omta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id jd261d00G39K7Mt3Vd293t; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:02:14 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:02:04 -0800 References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > I think the community will step up to knock down some of the > blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the > current > branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on > that front? Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security release will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yahoo can't handle another big release until january 2011. Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have the Maven story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win for downstream projects. One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. Especially if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start a vote that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. -- Owen From general-return-1050-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:20:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41505 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 77284 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77188 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:19:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77178 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:19:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:19:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.184] (HELO mail-qy0-f184.google.com) (209.85.221.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:19:51 +0000 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so912733qyk.9 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:19:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.224.17 with SMTP id im17mr2708322qcb.41.1266542369936; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:19:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:19:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed7840d961c047fe9e015 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ed7840d961c047fe9e015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Owen, that's useful information. It sounds like the API incompatibility vote can be a separate issue. Do we have consensus around rebasing on 0.21? Anyone already testing on 0.21 who would be upset if the current branch were to be retired? On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > > I think the community will step up to knock down some of the >> blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the current >> branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on that >> front? >> > > Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the > timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a > release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security release > will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first > integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yahoo > can't handle another big release until january 2011. > > Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have the Maven > story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win for > downstream projects. > > One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. Especially > if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start a vote > that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. > > -- Owen > --0016364ed7840d961c047fe9e015-- From general-return-1051-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:27:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43342 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:26:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:26:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 82722 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:26:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82647 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82637 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:26:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:26:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:26:51 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so5277907pzk.2 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:26:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.4.4 with SMTP id g4mr6931891rvi.275.1266542791193; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:26:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:26:11 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002181726m5e29dd65o14e6a6bb8bd4d0a1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wr= ote: > Thanks Owen, that's useful information. It sounds like the API > incompatibility vote can be a separate issue. > > Do we have consensus around rebasing on 0.21? Anyone already testing on 0= .21 > who would be upset if the current branch were to be retired? > One question I have is what to do with the JIRA tickets - we probably need some kind of bulk edit, right? Anything that's currently resolved with fix version 22 needs to be changed over to fix version 21? > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : > >> On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> =A0I think the community will step up to knock down some of the >>> blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the curren= t >>> branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on that >>> front? >>> >> >> Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the >> timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a >> release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security relea= se >> will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first >> integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yah= oo >> can't handle another big release until january 2011. >> >> Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have the Mave= n >> story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win for >> downstream projects. >> >> One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. Especia= lly >> if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start a vote >> that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-1052-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:30:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44604 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:30:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 85372 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85288 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85278 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:30:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:30:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 44481 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:14 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:30:14 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so858265bwz.29 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:30:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.137 with SMTP id h9mr620004bkd.134.1266543012408; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:30:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002180116n32c7d0d6ucc5b9342dfc9da1b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002180105y5339e19elf9712ed719a6500e@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002180116n32c7d0d6ucc5b9342dfc9da1b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:30:12 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002181730h613d7565j15b7e495021871fd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I rolled a new release candidate, but TestStreamingStatus is failing consistently after HADOOP-5623. The test passes when the changes are reverted. -C On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Filed HADOOP-6575. > > On the bright side, MAPREDUCE-623 can also be part of this release. -C > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Chris Douglas wrot= e: >> *sigh* The tests currently do not compile. HADOOP-6506 added a call in >> the build: >> >> + =A0 =A0 >> >> which does not exist in 0.20. -C >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wrot= e: >>> Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the bran= ch. >>> Please try it out and vote. >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ >>> >>> -- Owen >>> >> > From general-return-1053-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:31:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44865 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:31:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:31:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86320 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86237 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:31:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86227 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:31:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:31:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 44717 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:30:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:30:50 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7DE9C9.5090707@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:30:49 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <45f85f71002181726m5e29dd65o14e6a6bb8bd4d0a1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002181726m5e29dd65o14e6a6bb8bd4d0a1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd Lipcon wrote: > One question I have is what to do with the JIRA tickets - we probably > need some kind of bulk edit, right? Anything that's currently resolved > with fix version 22 needs to be changed over to fix version 21? Yes, that should be done if we decide to rebase the 0.21 branch. Doug From general-return-1054-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 01:32:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45461 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 01:32:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 01:32:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 87378 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87316 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87306 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:32:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 45316 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 01:32:06 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:32:06 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so859580bwz.29 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.3 with SMTP id j3mr3536356bkd.23.1266543124728; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002181730h613d7565j15b7e495021871fd@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002180105y5339e19elf9712ed719a6500e@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002180116n32c7d0d6ucc5b9342dfc9da1b@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002181730h613d7565j15b7e495021871fd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002181732oa3c1805o38a4b8493193be8d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release Hadoop 0.20.2 rc2? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Filed HADOOP-6576 -C On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > I rolled a new release candidate, but TestStreamingStatus is failing > consistently after HADOOP-5623. The test passes when the changes are > reverted. -C > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Chris Douglas wrot= e: >> Filed HADOOP-6575. >> >> On the bright side, MAPREDUCE-623 can also be part of this release. -C >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Chris Douglas wro= te: >>> *sigh* The tests currently do not compile. HADOOP-6506 added a call in >>> the build: >>> >>> + =A0 =A0 >>> >>> which does not exist in 0.20. -C >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Owen O'Malley wro= te: >>>> Ok, I've rolled a new tarball with Todd's suggested updates to the bra= nch. >>>> Please try it out and vote. >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/0.20.2/ >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1055-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 02:09:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59787 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 02:09:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 02:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 5473 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 02:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5390 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 02:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5379 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 02:09:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:08:59 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (gentlepaint-lx.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.185.127]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1J289AA080128 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:08:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HOEQH268sF6mVIrrv/SxmZNr/Bz27L60t5BMEHVweNfcswQ8idBdnpN9ua9YFRMA Message-ID: <4B7DF289.5060304@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:08:09 -0800 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/18/2010 5:19 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Do we have consensus around rebasing on 0.21? Anyone already testing on 0.21 > who would be upset if the current branch were to be retired? Rebasing 0.21 will further delay the release. In current 0.21 branch there is some 28 blockers, which will take a couple of weeks to fix. The rebased 0.21 will add to this more issues, and therefore more time. Based on the experience I had time to stabilize the release is measured in months rather than weeks. --Konstantin > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> > On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> > >> > I think the community will step up to knock down some of the >>> >> blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the current >>> >> branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on that >>> >> front? >>> >> >> > >> > Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the >> > timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a >> > release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security release >> > will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first >> > integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yahoo >> > can't handle another big release until january 2011. >> > >> > Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have the Maven >> > story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win for >> > downstream projects. >> > >> > One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. Especially >> > if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start a vote >> > that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. >> > >> > -- Owen >> > From general-return-1056-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 02:13:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60497 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 02:13:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 02:13:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7107 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 02:13:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7029 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 02:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7014 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 02:13:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:13:10 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so682909pwi.35 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.213.27 with SMTP id p27mr6828428rvq.176.1266545569189; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7DF289.5060304@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <4B7DF289.5060304@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:29 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002181812s66f154fan551840c3b70bad39@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wr= ote: > On 2/18/2010 5:19 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> Do we have consensus around rebasing on 0.21? Anyone already testing on >> 0.21 >> who would be upset if the current branch were to be retired? > > Rebasing 0.21 will further delay the release. > In current 0.21 branch there is some 28 blockers, > which will take a couple of weeks to fix. > The rebased 0.21 will add to this more issues, and therefore > more time. Based on the experience I had time to stabilize > the release is measured in months rather than weeks. I agree that we're probably talking months rather than weeks. However, I see a lot of the stabilization time as a fixed cost regardless of the number of changes. Certainly there is an O(n) component too, but I don't think the stabilization time of a rebased 21 is double the stabilization time of current 21. Maybe more like 30% more? Do you disagree? -Todd > --Konstantin > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley =A0wr= ote: >> >>> > =A0On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>> > >>> > =A0 =A0I think the community will step up to knock down some of the >>>> >>>> >> =A0blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the >>>> >> current >>>> >> =A0branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on >>>> >> that >>>> >> =A0front? >>>> >> >>> >>> > >>> > =A0Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of = the >>> > =A0timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to pu= sh a >>> > =A0release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security >>> > release >>> > =A0will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first >>> > =A0integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august= ). >>> > Yahoo >>> > =A0can't handle another big release until january 2011. >>> > >>> > =A0Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have th= e >>> > Maven >>> > =A0story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win f= or >>> > =A0downstream projects. >>> > >>> > =A0One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. >>> > Especially >>> > =A0if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start = a >>> > vote >>> > =A0that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. >>> > >>> > =A0-- Owen >>> > > > From general-return-1057-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 03:43:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88546 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 03:43:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 03:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 49806 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 03:43:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49732 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 03:43:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49722 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 03:43:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:43:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.181] (HELO mail-pz0-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:42:56 +0000 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so370074pzk.30 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:42:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.213.42 with SMTP id p42mr6882701rvq.168.1266550953186; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:42:33 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.12.163.130] In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002181812s66f154fan551840c3b70bad39@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <4B7DF289.5060304@yahoo-inc.com> <45f85f71002181812s66f154fan551840c3b70bad39@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:42:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Tomer Shiran To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1b3e0a79778047febdf3c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1b3e0a79778047febdf3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If we include symlinks, security and Avro in 0.21, then what's the feature set for 0.22? Do we have any big items planned? Thanks, Tomer On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > On 2/18/2010 5:19 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >> > >> Do we have consensus around rebasing on 0.21? Anyone already testing on > >> 0.21 > >> who would be upset if the current branch were to be retired? > > > > Rebasing 0.21 will further delay the release. > > In current 0.21 branch there is some 28 blockers, > > which will take a couple of weeks to fix. > > The rebased 0.21 will add to this more issues, and therefore > > more time. Based on the experience I had time to stabilize > > the release is measured in months rather than weeks. > > I agree that we're probably talking months rather than weeks. However, > I see a lot of the stabilization time as a fixed cost regardless of > the number of changes. Certainly there is an O(n) component too, but I > don't think the stabilization time of a rebased 21 is double the > stabilization time of current 21. Maybe more like 30% more? Do you > disagree? > > -Todd > > > > --Konstantin > > > > > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> > >>> > On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > >>> > > >>> > I think the community will step up to knock down some of the > >>>> > >>>> >> blockers once we resolve what should be in the 0.21 release: the > >>>> >> current > >>>> >> branch, or a rebase on trunk. Do you/Yahoo! have a preference on > >>>> >> that > >>>> >> front? > >>>> >> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of > the > >>> > timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push > a > >>> > release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security > >>> > release > >>> > will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first > >>> > integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). > >>> > Yahoo > >>> > can't handle another big release until january 2011. > >>> > > >>> > Personally, I'd prefer to rebase 0.21, especially after we have the > >>> > Maven > >>> > story straightened out. Generating good poms would be a huge win for > >>> > downstream projects. > >>> > > >>> > One big concern is that backwards incompatibility is a big cost. > >>> > Especially > >>> > if 0.21 (like 0.19) never gets wide deployment, I'd like to start a > >>> > vote > >>> > that we don't make any API incompatible in 0.22 relative to 0.20. > >>> > > >>> > -- Owen > >>> > > > > > > -- Tomer Shiran Director of Product Management | MapR Technologies (www.mapr.com) | 650-804-8657 --000e0cd1b3e0a79778047febdf3c-- From general-return-1058-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 04:37:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2843 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 04:37:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 04:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 72854 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72708 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72698 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 04:37:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:37:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.184] (HELO mail-qy0-f184.google.com) (209.85.221.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:37:08 +0000 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so1030374qyk.9 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UW/wdlszPfBFkRjm91tC2C/cM5COH3xF8RYlV6WYIZk=; b=Nm+ElHvvD0vstmyW0b2JWZf6KnzNA0kGwzO7EOnr/l+n6xsSGRYEb4nwlmFuDMlo/U rBEf6y4h+K1NA3ngQ95lttcM+/I7AsFf+ar6rgNtTBZlGrf6lWb/5wiFRoPkCOquvUND z8nZJt0y6UieHoNkrfXlK7GakSjPQJYube/7Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dZ8SnCGqXF46uyHCpMEVSWB5+LNavDHS6l+/8VwL9wqpuymqXVjbS+f3ffMa1xJ3Wv FwocwzYSt95lwtx289nJgFL/GwAzTXTI9quY2MM2d462rd+Gnc5IO4w2vqAX/mbiAq5v S84ZJQmYFQhF/YTbH9oKvTQ7YlNvwNAHgDVGY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.33.70 with SMTP id g6mr12053qcd.75.1266554207422; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:36:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:36:47 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b40400ed77101547 Message-ID: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the > timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a > release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security release > will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first > integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yahoo > can't handle another big release until january 2011. I haven't done a survey but my guess is that the HBase crew would favor putting out the current 0.21 branch as 0.21 rather than rebasing. To us, hdfs and its flush, in testing, runs great. I'm with Konstantin and Sanjay that a release is pretty close and that a rebasing pulling in new features means more months even allowing for the Todd stabilizing constant. If the project is not getting any heavy-duty Y!-fu till ~January 2011, that sounds like hadoop 0.23 time, rather than 0.22, to me, that is if we want to get the project back on 6-month cycles again (> 1 year between major releases ain't healthy). St.Ack From general-return-1059-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 09:08:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93303 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 09:08:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 09:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 80720 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 09:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80626 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 09:08:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80616 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 09:08:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:08:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:08:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 93005 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 09:07:43 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:07:43 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so1050279bwz.29 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:07:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.131.210 with SMTP id y18mr458217bks.100.1266570460462; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:07:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:07:40 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 Please try it out. -C From general-return-1060-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 16:53:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79709 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 16:53:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 16:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 32314 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 16:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32244 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 16:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32234 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 16:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ashutosh.chauhan@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.218] (HELO mail-ew0-f218.google.com) (209.85.219.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:53:21 +0000 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so294984ewy.11 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:53:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+BiC5rMGg9IeQGBKEPhxOKcrYTCeBhiPhL2Lt+0DWOY=; b=uVaun29i/JXKh50ZlDxwq+aU6fsvaACRwbLSd1WGAeqvPAvF+wCaZgUFMxL6vFPQr/ 2HAkwD8w24G4FLGzyo1agn+T88ih3Sk/I26lGiKuze42UXq9MEFV6rn+tOTpgRlPgQQH DIXS8N9dQ5VaUlk6Duq5/NP/dIMNNSJUhXMDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=wDq6AOU0dlM6YRv/DamVTe4u8qge3tuoF6dLqV4HZlbJbyt/3UvnlrxpKP/vj88zaC tHaPE9F+gMb2qQQXC6+xUbHljJ0Ofj350ES6vQ3glWeRO+vxzWXWJT8/ABl70FEsE14B Kz6MdDk9yGkEEXnPYIitNtX0ki358/OvqlJK0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.79 with SMTP id x57mr3325245wee.83.1266598379911; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:52:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> References: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> From: Ashutosh Chauhan Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:52:38 -0800 Message-ID: <54de02ae1002190852re61625ehf3c477b1975836d1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7dfa781f94e047ff6eaf8 --0016e6d7dfa781f94e047ff6eaf8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Downloaded the tar ball. Build the jar. Ran tests, small scripts and few dfs commands through grunt. All looks good. +1 Ashutosh On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:22, Alan Gates wrote: > All, > > I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to > http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ > A description of what is new and different in this release is included in > the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that directory. Please > download the candidate, test it, and vote. > > Alan. > --0016e6d7dfa781f94e047ff6eaf8-- From general-return-1061-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 19:08:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57771 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 19:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16554 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16467 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16457 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:08:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:08:20 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so72968qwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CdeBb/yPjpb9vv2Kc7zmf+3prhMLcEStXNn3h5+dGG8=; b=OQCPmFeJ/mkYxZ8rzBForOOgahWgeL8+jmhNoqa4LCqc/Puie5yLxRU4sDJINRTrmw MH3NZ7/9sxVafydTrOQ7Pej56DYeyaTcaruVu4ekJPAkNlivrHm7nT4W+Fd7ialoUdqw A8Qv/4sDjhzogYQywL07Myrr400l1Xs9ZZxc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=s/IVXFFBO3GJSar1jVrKzHAbmX2NztfbSfbCdJNGar5+h9WFmq//ci5PP64vRQMzgq YvlwolEzDPuGyucnB4IJvpGy6vs/qNeBItFtEjxnf+wAy/GixweQlvJKC0OJco9mVWjA /9Sl+e49/H7rdxDvklZrNLYSlWdfK3WQ43Hl8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.230.84 with SMTP id jl20mr4980728qcb.88.1266606480208; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:08:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ddc1077375cf35de Message-ID: <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look grand. St.Ack On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > Please try it out. -C > From general-return-1062-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 21:44:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11000 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 21:44:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 21:44:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 22522 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:44:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22442 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22432 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 21:44:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:44:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:44:31 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so511574pwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:44:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.67.7 with SMTP id p7mr7730105wfa.120.1266615850068; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:44:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:44:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Stack wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >> Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the >> timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a >> release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security relea= se >> will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first >> integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). Yah= oo >> can't handle another big release until january 2011. > > I haven't done a survey but my guess is that the HBase crew would > favor putting out the current 0.21 branch as 0.21 rather than > rebasing. =A0To us, hdfs and its flush, in testing, runs great. =A0I'm > with Konstantin and Sanjay that a release is pretty close and that a > rebasing pulling in new features means more months even allowing for > the Todd stabilizing constant. Given that Yahoo and others plan to skip 21, and the HBase crowd could actually use 21 and have invested in the current branch's contents, it sounds like we should try to get the current branch released. Anyone object? Thanks, Eli From general-return-1063-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 21:48:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12721 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 21:48:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 21:48:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 28773 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:48:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28685 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28675 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 21:48:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:48:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.182] (HELO mail-px0-f182.google.com) (209.85.216.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:48:41 +0000 Received: by pxi12 with SMTP id 12so299513pxi.33 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.124.18 with SMTP id b18mr995324rvn.151.1266616100158; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325562e1eb77c12047ffb0aba X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325562e1eb77c12047ffb0aba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 from me. I agree with Stack; faster release cycles will help keep the project focused and get code testing and soaking in more environments. - Aaron On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Stack wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> Yahoo doesn't care. Even if we rebase the 0.21 branch, because of the > >> timing, Yahoo will probably never deploy it. (It take months to push a > >> release through QA and production testing, as I wrote the security > release > >> will hit the pipeline this year (code complete in february, first > >> integration cluster in april, on all production clusters by august). > Yahoo > >> can't handle another big release until january 2011. > > > > I haven't done a survey but my guess is that the HBase crew would > > favor putting out the current 0.21 branch as 0.21 rather than > > rebasing. To us, hdfs and its flush, in testing, runs great. I'm > > with Konstantin and Sanjay that a release is pretty close and that a > > rebasing pulling in new features means more months even allowing for > > the Todd stabilizing constant. > > Given that Yahoo and others plan to skip 21, and the HBase crowd could > actually use 21 and have invested in the current branch's contents, it > sounds like we should try to get the current branch released. Anyone > object? > > Thanks, > Eli > --000325562e1eb77c12047ffb0aba-- From general-return-1064-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 21:58:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17765 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 21:58:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 21:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 49138 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:58:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49075 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:58:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49065 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 21:58:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:58:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:58:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 17592 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 21:58:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:58:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:58:29 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli Collins wrote: > Given that Yahoo and others plan to skip 21, and the HBase crowd could > actually use 21 and have invested in the current branch's contents, it > sounds like we should try to get the current branch released. My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be made. If we embrace a six-month trunk branch cycle, then the next branch from trunk should be created soon, regardless of whether we call it 21 or 22. Also note that this decision has compatibility implications, unless we decide to, post-fact, declare that 0.20 was actually a major release (1.0) and that 0.21 (1.1) and 0.22 (1.2) are minor, feature releases, that may add deprecations and features but may not remove any or otherwise change APIs incompatibly. Doug From general-return-1065-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 21:59:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17884 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 21:59:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 21:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 50047 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:59:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49979 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 21:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49965 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 21:59:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:59:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:58:58 +0000 Received: from pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com (pugholehand-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.115.44]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1JLvq07004999; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:57:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:x-priority:references: message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=KQu6yvWXssBy4z2tV0jTlYEkirYAn45ai2PdbT3vcMA8H3qaBb3v3hleqgRo57Mf From: Alan Gates To: private@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1E049E93BEE249D59D88B0DDACEF9106@DanielLaptop> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 X-Priority: 3 References: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> <14B7BB1E-F459-4FBC-AEBD-120B822281E3@yahoo-inc.com> <1E049E93BEE249D59D88B0DDACEF9106@DanielLaptop> Message-Id: <466AB331-82A3-4111-BA34-75F44A31DBCF@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:57:51 -0800 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Alright, I'll fix that and reroll the release. Alan. On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > "pig -version" should report 0.6.0 instead of 0.6.1. +1 otherwise. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Alan Gates" > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM > To: > Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 > >> PMC members, >> >> Please take a look and vote. Thanks. >> >> Alan. >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Alan Gates >>> Date: February 16, 2010 11:22:52 AM PST >>> To: >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>> Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ >>> A description of what is new and different in this release is >>> included in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that >>> directory. Please download the candidate, test it, and vote. >>> >>> Alan. From general-return-1066-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 22:20:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32154 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 22:20:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 22:20:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 84418 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:20:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84348 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84338 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 22:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:20:21 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so539717pwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:20:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.118.3 with SMTP id q3mr2819803wfc.199.1266617999971; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:19:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:19:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: >> >> Given that Yahoo and others plan to skip 21, and the HBase crowd could >> actually use 21 and have invested in the current branch's contents, it >> sounds like we should try to get the current branch released. > > My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be made. If we > embrace a six-month trunk branch cycle, then the next branch from trunk > should be created soon, regardless of whether we call it 21 or 22. > Does there need to be a dependency? We could still branch 22 once security, avro, etc are in, even if that's only a couple months from now. Minor releases are supposed to come out in a matter of months anyway, since we haven't released a major version yet. > Also note that this decision has compatibility implications, unless we > decide to, post-fact, declare that 0.20 was actually a major release (1.0) > and that 0.21 (1.1) and 0.22 (1.2) are minor, feature releases, that may add > deprecations and features but may not remove any or otherwise change APIs > incompatibly. Could the vote on whether 22 is backwards compatible with 20 be independent of what we call 1.0? Guess it depends on what type of backwards compatibility we're talking about (eg API vs wire). Given that already branched 21 a while back, it seems like we should be able to release it, regardless of how a compatibility vote goes. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1067-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 22:49:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47147 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 22:49:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 22:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 30867 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:49:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30765 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:49:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30755 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 22:49:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:49:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:49:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 46966 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 22:49:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:49:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:49:32 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli Collins wrote: >> My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be made. > > Does there need to be a dependency? No. I just wanted to note that, from my point of view, releasing from the existing 0.21 branch is not sufficient, that, regardless, we still need to release from trunk soon, and we need a schedule going forward for when future branches from trunk will be made. Aside from resolving compatibility issues (more on that below) what we perhaps need are one or two release master volunteers, for a release based on trunk and perhaps for a release based on the 0.21 branch. > Could the vote on whether 22 is backwards compatible with 20 be > independent of what we call 1.0? We minimally need to declare whether releases are major or minor. The convention has been that all 0.X releases are major, 1.0 is major, 1.1, 1.2, etc. are minor, 2.0 is major, 2.1, 2.2, etc are minor and so on. We could amend this convention, but things might get confusing. For example, we could declare that we just have a sequence of numerically increasing releases, some major, some minor, but that you can't tell which is which from the number. Or we could, like Sun did with Java, move the decimal point, and say that 0.20 is just 2.0, and that, instead of 0.21 our next release is 2.1. Or we could, as I suggested in my previous message, retroactively consider 0.20 to be 1.0, and then make our next release 1.1. None are particularly attractive options. Doug From general-return-1068-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 22:54:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49370 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 22:54:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 22:54:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 37692 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37617 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 22:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37607 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 22:54:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:54:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:53:59 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so605125yxe.2 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:53:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YNwQTOL40LjgN8uS0aUm8HWipOMxzoh1gSQparehvAE=; b=Ogz7ieE0dv0wWabI8dexsMukJBnlJaIO7JgbcOlVb+jRbwk715joRnKWmeHfs7Qgcr 4qRO/YoyzNcar7w98cBUyOHZ4c+eW1XKGaHLRsNlzjLLD0UCeVTIMUAuReCx7i05lsCQ rMG1MpvuZu5Dpp8b8sWRkqcRNUGRBTNsKpEJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xap9UifRfgkelGr+e6m/r+FOgP4CrtVcSdRbD/y3FGkHcbCiZoITUePhm3SQ4fVekf GKiMcLv/7taVYow0WkPWSPy97mem7MrQUa53otDE8Vz9KBsUZ/+p8R08XD5R14/GU8wj xKxJhpK+1CFxBOfQQoYlyjVbwy2UiOLISPNnQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.213.2 with SMTP id p2mr2789673anq.229.1266620018867; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:53:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:53:38 -0500 Message-ID: <54dc3c51002191453j98b9055vdf85531a5d202bad@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c9252b4a3e6b047ffbf4c3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c9252b4a3e6b047ffbf4c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop 2 EE Version 5? On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: > >> My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be made. >>> >> >> Does there need to be a dependency? >> > > No. I just wanted to note that, from my point of view, releasing from the > existing 0.21 branch is not sufficient, that, regardless, we still need to > release from trunk soon, and we need a schedule going forward for when > future branches from trunk will be made. > > Aside from resolving compatibility issues (more on that below) what we > perhaps need are one or two release master volunteers, for a release based > on trunk and perhaps for a release based on the 0.21 branch. > > > Could the vote on whether 22 is backwards compatible with 20 be >> independent of what we call 1.0? >> > > We minimally need to declare whether releases are major or minor. The > convention has been that all 0.X releases are major, 1.0 is major, 1.1, 1.2, > etc. are minor, 2.0 is major, 2.1, 2.2, etc are minor and so on. We could > amend this convention, but things might get confusing. For example, we > could declare that we just have a sequence of numerically increasing > releases, some major, some minor, but that you can't tell which is which > from the number. Or we could, like Sun did with Java, move the decimal > point, and say that 0.20 is just 2.0, and that, instead of 0.21 our next > release is 2.1. Or we could, as I suggested in my previous message, > retroactively consider 0.20 to be 1.0, and then make our next release 1.1. > None are particularly attractive options. > > Doug > --001636c9252b4a3e6b047ffbf4c3-- From general-return-1069-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 23:15:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57637 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 23:15:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 23:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 65810 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 23:15:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65757 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 23:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65747 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 23:15:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:15:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:15:18 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so579935pwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:14:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.8 with SMTP id d8mr7755268wfa.81.1266621298583; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:14:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:14:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: >>> >>> My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be made. >> >> Does there need to be a dependency? > > No. =A0I just wanted to note that, from my point of view, releasing from = the > existing 0.21 branch is not sufficient, that, regardless, we still need t= o > release from trunk soon, and we need a schedule going forward for when > future branches from trunk will be made. > Agreed. Releasing a 21 won't settle the release process question or tell us when the first major release is. Maybe we could get 21 behind us and have a separate discussion covering those. >> Could the vote on whether 22 is backwards compatible with 20 be >> independent of what we call 1.0? > > We minimally need to declare whether releases are major or minor. I was assuming 21 would be another minor release, didn't hear otherwise when it was branched. I didn't interpret the compatibility vote as a suggestion that we should retroactively consider 20 to be the first major release, but rather a suggestion for voting that we don't remove APIs in 22 that were deprecated in 20. Owen, please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1070-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 19 23:39:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64247 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 23:39:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 23:39:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 90741 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 23:38:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90663 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 23:38:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90653 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 23:38:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:38:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:38:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 64217 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 23:38:35 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.107]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:38:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:38:34 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli Collins wrote: > Maybe we could get 21 behind > us and have a separate discussion covering those. I'm personally more interested in that discussion than in what's currently in the 0.21 branch, but others, like Stack, may reasonably be of the opposite persuasion. So rather than putting one before the other, can we pursue both in parallel? > I was assuming 21 would be another minor release, didn't hear > otherwise when it was branched. We've never officially had a minor release. All of our releases have been either major or bugfix. A minor release adds features but does not remove any deprecated APIs. So making 0.21 a minor release would be a change in the rules. Have no deprecations in fact been removed between the 0.20 and 0.21 branches? Perhaps we can agree that, after 0.20, no deprecations will be removed until 1.0, that all pre-1.0 releases after 0.20 are now minor instead of major, that 0.20 was effectively 1.0 but we're not going to rename it, and that 1.0 will effectively be 2.0, etc. Could that work? Doug From general-return-1071-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 20 00:19:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75954 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2010 00:19:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2010 00:19:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 21548 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 00:19:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21478 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 00:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21468 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2010 00:19:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:19:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:18:59 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=dpyiqKJYWEoTwMJwzlaxilEhyOLPhPQPGtsCHUlmFXPVCpCCYSqsnnzc CbM5Nv0W82mLJhGY6vBrYWV4dnnqOaNZMeRH3o8538rQYAt7o9Z9TJXPG HE5f23sAAnSM7Y7; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1266625139; x=1298161139; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Release=20plans|Date:=20Fri,=2019=20Feb =202010=2016:18:23=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit |In-Reply-To:=20<4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org>; bh=INnM7cn7Dh2GLTWXXfoRTXMexyCNu8LfiGpA4VJTfgs=; b=iFBNHHpun83KM3Z0V6tKJFsTk9DyubGOC3eb7Kt3FYpOuYvx7xD0JbKt Piy4p791S/LGurXY5I17uBYjExNv8WPbEdYjVR5Nidx3mOmEtfkkovhtd 4k2e9CI+Cd4NxfE; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,506,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="10974159" Received: from 172.16.22.176 ([172.16.22.176]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:18:26 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:18:23 -0800 Subject: Re: Release plans From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Release plans Thread-Index: AcqxwjaFG2b/fCDTjESXxU4jmgi6jg== In-Reply-To: <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/19/10 3:38 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Perhaps we can agree that, after 0.20, no deprecations will be removed > until 1.0, that all pre-1.0 releases after 0.20 are now minor instead of > major, that 0.20 was effectively 1.0 but we're not going to rename it, > and that 1.0 will effectively be 2.0, etc. Could that work? FWIW: I'm still very much opposed to any 1.0 that isn't ABI-wire compatible going forward. From general-return-1072-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 20 00:24:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77482 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2010 00:24:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2010 00:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 25122 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 00:24:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25044 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 00:24:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25034 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2010 00:24:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:24:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:24:13 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so624263pwi.35 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.8 with SMTP id d8mr7777723wfa.81.1266625432940; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> References: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release plans From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Eli Collins wrote: >> >> Maybe we could get 21 behind >> us and have a separate discussion covering those. > > I'm personally more interested in that discussion than in what's currentl= y > in the 0.21 branch, but others, like Stack, may reasonably be of the > opposite persuasion. =A0So rather than putting one before the other, can = we > pursue both in parallel? > Don't want to hold up the release process, version, compatibility discussion, or have it hold up work on the 21 release (most 21 blockers are probably trunk blockers so probably not much wasted effort either way). >> I was assuming 21 would be another minor release, didn't hear >> otherwise when it was branched. > > We've never officially had a minor release. =A0All of our releases have b= een > either major or bugfix. =A0A minor release adds features but does not rem= ove > any deprecated APIs. =A0So making 0.21 a minor release would be a change = in > the rules. > Good to know, the versioning scheme (major.minor.point) outlined on the wiki makes it seem like there's only been minor and point releases. Can we make a decision on basing 21 on the current branch and if it's decided that 22 can't remove stuff that was in 20 we'll go back and do the necessary additions on 21 and trunk? Suspect that decision will take a lot more back and forth, but needs to conclude before 21 is released. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1073-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Feb 20 22:04:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7047 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2010 22:04:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2010 22:04:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 72570 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 22:04:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72468 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 22:04:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72458 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2010 22:04:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:04:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:04:34 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so235871qwi.35 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:04:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8qDzSNMS7BgeElDeSBeo23ssya2hi/XcfinHr5snJmE=; b=EdsduFLkr9n37168j/kgezO49aE9c9MNNXuObFr1Mhf1MwwUaUmeQ8EwFfb37fbbY6 FicLdShrUxdyxrfW5tZjkKVbdHZHArhriRJO6HHNDmoCJJCvikQ7n6feozymHESJFAXz v0TXkOl80lu20x/vPvsJd+8RIE+8QDvNyP3/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Ob2xbtaHDUG7aUMVnXkPuPQW7ip+kuIJ8ybNKFvJES6Z/R84XYnBuVbPSMFxFQJnX7 qJwqPLx8bYppvYGn0Plj9630feLqoZ3Kg8gefbaxCFt0K/M6GgfsT1paLLBAVLl3dVmZ D269b3NnyQNj/czTaYCYGDxPgWzHe24opGEmI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.107.29 with SMTP id z29mr629458qco.42.1266703450479; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:04:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:04:10 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d2dbac5606b200cd Message-ID: <7c962aed1002201404q71c4b820x1fdf16d8f473be88@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Release plans From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Can we make a decision on basing 21 on the current branch and if it's > decided that 22 can't remove stuff that was in 20 we'll go back and do > the necessary additions on 21 and trunk? Suspect that decision will > take a lot more back and forth, but needs to conclude before 21 is > released. > Lets. Regards 0.21/current-branch release, as has been suggested above, first we need to figure the release master. No release master, no release. If we have a release master, then I suggest we vote on current branch being released as 0.21 as soon as the blockers are cleared. I don't think we need muddy the above vote with whether or not 0.21 maintains API combatibility with 0.20. IMO, it must (because Y! want to have the 0.20 API in place when January 2011 rolls around). This makes 0.21 a "minor" release -- something we've not done before (For the record, I also had a misunderstanding that what we were doing up to this was major and patch only). So, part of the release process would involve ensuring no removed deprecations, etc. As DC has been saying, this requirement that releases between now and January 2011 not change APIs makes 0.20 retroactively into a "major" release. 0.20 is the release where major shifted left in our versioning scheme and minor releases came into play. 0.21 and 0.22 will be minor releases. Can we just acknowledge this fact, that there was a step at version 0.20, update the wiki around versioning -- its currently wrong anyways as Elis' points out -- and just move on? Going back and calling 0.20 a 1.0 seems more apt to create confusion and besides, I'm with Allen that hadoop 1.0 needs wire compatibility before the 1.0 can roll around. Thanks, St.Ack P.S. +1 on branching as soon as avro and security are in, etc. From general-return-1074-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Feb 21 02:54:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 577 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2010 02:54:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2010 02:54:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 4693 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2010 02:54:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4553 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2010 02:54:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4543 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2010 02:54:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:54:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:53:52 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so1356703pwi.35 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:53:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yK+bV9yYZn3Mi0VOqZyZaH1CfV6qlLrNRGdiVFzukWE=; b=TtkAW24pDmOzuXVH6hmsiP0pWGKrji1/Ue747pgj6nTOOQpVw4uvnSd38D/Fmc+THp UFtqLgpoy2tMUDeZ7zsRb/f9lieTnDeqW44iTykPfM7X2YSIyjKoMSzr3cCqd7kSGW4K HhTPBDdI0IdhaitRvFrtQEVlL8gvUznEdicYw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sWIvsxfLcbNf4aBKUZMUdXS34ds+aCBcpSj0iixQXHCFAFvi5AHrx08WFnJCEs18T4 QeC4qpblll/VuvNSIHfM+CxeDrKdX21c4zcHGnC3ZNNNKlv2ot8nuyw3wRp8g4XdD+au GXnTNWe++VCg5uvJipqg8qAJWYuLiwv8d1Izs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.125.11 with SMTP id c11mr3224133rvn.34.1266720812111; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:53:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:53:32 -0800 Message-ID: <314098691002201853x669559bcnd44a6b5822bd461a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IGphdmEuaW8uSU9FeGNlcHRpb246IENhbm5vdCBvcGVuIGZpbGVuYW1lIC91c2VyLw==?= =?UTF-8?B?cm9vdC/vv71z77+9dO+/vWXvv71w77+9Me+/vS/vv71w77+9Ye+/vXLvv71077+9Le+/vTDvv70w77+9?= =?UTF-8?B?MO+/vTDvv70w?= From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable something is not doing character set conversion correctly somewhere in your code path. If the text was passed in the email correctly each ascii letter is prefixed by 3 bytes 0xEF,0xBF,0xBD, which is the encoding for \u0FFFD, the utf 8 character that utf8 decoders use to replace an illegal utf8 byte sequence. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_Specials It looks like the file data is written in a double byte format, perhaps utf16 and the reader is not able to correctly recognize the character encoding, and the first byte of each double byte pair is being replaced by the replacement character \u0FFFD, while the second byte, the actual ascii character in your path is passed forward by the stream reader. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Harshit Kumar wro= te: > > Hi > > I dont understand the reason for this error. > > java.io.IOException: Cannot open filename > /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/= =EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.openInfo(DFSClient.java:1= 394) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.(DFSClient.java:1385) = at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.open(DFSClient.java:338) at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.open(DistributedFileSystem.j= ava:171) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:359) at > org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:40) at > org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:1) at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:436) at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:158) > > > I have a code that scans a folder step0 to find name of files generated i= n > the previous map-reduce phase. Then create another file with the entries = for > ex: > if scanning finds that there are 2 files produced by 1st map-reduce phase= , > then new created file will have 2 entries step1/part00000 and > step1/part00001 i.e. one entry for each file. > > Now, when I read this file in another map-reduce job, each line is read a= s > /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/= =EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 . What it seems like, a string > inserted by my code, when read by FSDataInputStream prefix each character= of > the string by a question mark (?). Why is that so? > > The file name part-00000 do exist inside folder step1, but reading this > filename, /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1= =EF=BF=BD/=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 , throws IOException > which I can undersand that there is no such filename, but why are these ?= 's > infiltraded before each letter. > > Really appreciate if some one can help me solve this riddle? > > Thanks and Regards > H. Kumar > skype: harshit900 > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals From general-return-1075-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 02:43:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38497 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 02:43:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 02:43:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6441 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 02:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6370 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 02:43:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6360 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 02:43:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:43:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.212] (HELO mail-gx0-f212.google.com) (209.85.217.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:43:37 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so2486055gxk.5 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:43:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2fboe8UhvJDnrdaH31NqJcmm+kLqSH7vEg27t5YH2y4=; b=mQEmYLkQwHP/GIogjMIMgKZLDJry1pGiGzSpDHeUhtqWcnZ5N7gcJ6jALQRoC/9HlV c+9IpY8cS3VUNNjJnKREnWTOCb9dR1EzCZDB5Uw5pfS3tuYnk68/hf+A/F/KybEcEINn 1mJkbNPF6XWbVYpczabGHGwf8go8h1NXBmCQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=umqDE45PqQf0Wgr6WWu7LubMe4R7QbSpekl6alXgOMW/uyUw/r8PXHADfij0hh4+wG PgUM/7FhfVh2rlQaqdrz3L9tuSFUi01W135e1g4ZOhtY03YCBzlxn5PEyk4w4FU4ew5T TTogTFER5s4nyECKXzU+H6wW4U2yUVCXXPHBM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.184.14 with SMTP id h14mr3928840ybf.51.1266806596942; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:43:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <314098691002201853x669559bcnd44a6b5822bd461a@mail.gmail.com> References: <314098691002201853x669559bcnd44a6b5822bd461a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:43:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb71002211843j74a0f963xb2118c184f02b022@mail.gmail.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IGphdmEuaW8uSU9FeGNlcHRpb246IENhbm5vdCBvcGVuIGZpbGVuYW1lIC91c2VyLw==?= =?UTF-8?B?cm9vdC/vv71z77+9dO+/vWXvv71w77+9Me+/vS/vv71w77+9Ye+/vXLvv71077+9Le+/vTDvv70w77+9?= =?UTF-8?B?MO+/vTDvv70w?= From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6ed6a35bc310480276530 --000e0cd6ed6a35bc310480276530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is this, by any chance, related to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-983? You should try if you can recreate your problem with the patch from http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6522? thanks, dhruba On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jason Venner wrote= : > something is not doing character set conversion correctly somewhere in > your code path. > If the text was passed in the email correctly each ascii letter is > prefixed by 3 bytes > 0xEF,0xBF,0xBD, which is the encoding for \u0FFFD, the utf 8 character > that utf8 decoders use to replace an illegal utf8 byte sequence. see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_Specials > > It looks like the file data is written in a double byte format, > perhaps utf16 and the reader is not able to correctly recognize the > character encoding, and the first byte of each double byte pair is > being replaced by the replacement character \u0FFFD, while the second > byte, the actual ascii character in your path is passed forward by the > stream reader. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Harshit Kumar > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I dont understand the reason for this error. > > > > java.io.IOException: Cannot open filename > > /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/= =EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.openInfo(DFSClient.java:1= 394) > > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.(DFSClient.java:1385= ) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.open(DFSClient.java:338) at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.open(DistributedFileSystem.j= ava:171) > > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:359) at > > org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:40) at > > org.bike.MakeNPairReduce.reduce(MakeNPairReduce.java:1) at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask.run(ReduceTask.java:436) at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:158) > > > > > > I have a code that scans a folder step0 to find name of files generated > in > > the previous map-reduce phase. Then create another file with the entrie= s > for > > ex: > > if scanning finds that there are 2 files produced by 1st map-reduce > phase, > > then new created file will have 2 entries step1/part00000 and > > step1/part00001 i.e. one entry for each file. > > > > Now, when I read this file in another map-reduce job, each line is read > as > > /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1=EF=BF=BD/= =EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 . What it seems like, a > string > > inserted by my code, when read by FSDataInputStream prefix each charact= er > of > > the string by a question mark (?). Why is that so? > > > > The file name part-00000 do exist inside folder step1, but reading this > > filename, /user/root/=EF=BF=BDs=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BDe=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BD1= =EF=BF=BD/=EF=BF=BDp=EF=BF=BDa=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BDt=EF=BF=BD-=EF=BF=BD0=EF= =BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0=EF=BF=BD0 , throws > IOException > > which I can undersand that there is no such filename, but why are these > ?'s > > infiltraded before each letter. > > > > Really appreciate if some one can help me solve this riddle? > > > > Thanks and Regards > > H. Kumar > > skype: harshit900 > > Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com > > Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > --=20 Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd6ed6a35bc310480276530-- From general-return-1076-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 04:21:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78131 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 04:21:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 04:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 69754 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 04:21:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69606 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 04:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69591 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 04:21:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:21:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yangxiao9901@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:21:47 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so2042010pwi.35 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:20:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=TtJJwHs8r6pJwDKQVEFSDN8e9qK9Vz6AYHRvgsQn+18=; b=tgndu/HHVBEcOw07LgBwzKmcGAIf1DW+ld5WjF5jRlWNiZJ5NOEKia1IWF0sFwwhMR 9bgZuQ7aYxtQ478itu6yyyAqDldRDSHrmhzSHnYnhT20dIGiYM0XodaOPtI4fnbnXJxg 5KKXcrJHDGGKVhNPN5KzSG6k44hKXQG9c5DR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QtuT8rHcYn92GZdMrMaMuNxXM7hpnxh+q3KE63T4VyM75Ve+uL+HSBsxv6N+3xTIrU M/dUp/B6auoYulJGOg8wV9JlpAfMbkO6O/9cjD5e1y4qMLxTc406BT6ppEvzYQerMAOB 2oekEzQocKpPFYYr5ORTatMXR9wZHXj7f2zPw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.100.20 with SMTP id c20mr8656512rvm.143.1266812425833; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:20:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:20:25 +0800 Message-ID: <5a921af21002212020u5677fd1tabc549322787c41f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Namenode data loss From: xiao yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My namenode failed, and I can't find data back on this machine. I have look into the data directory in secondary namenode, but the "name" directory is empty. What should I do? Thanks! Xiao From general-return-1077-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 04:56:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87086 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 04:56:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 04:56:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 95107 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 04:56:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95004 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 04:56:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94994 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 04:56:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:56:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:56:41 +0000 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so408970vws.35 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:55:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=CFDimYN8TdznufT58pRB0tXuQwzb0parylGlcJUAwUo=; b=LzqSTUVutLhcCIsN0ai1YDE45bd61OfNburzz3j7pRF1l7V12f0dBXCMpLHmeet8Cb v567haAqDpABeS+jLdHiPkI+gIo6YE3cCUSLOTBPca/TkkFbPOa2FSMdI1tl4MSe+D8B Fq2puqyjUq+19M58RHjk+LY3sLJziXOlblT+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=f8RB4+TUWgJlwDBVKt93lV+RoTSlBQFukRFSZv+alljEql3AdAVj13Pm/yaBoLGj/R 9sNu/4eF62tGvemOnvjzNkkEX2wM18C4XHgXC0GS+tJYtGyaj7HApZ3E/tUVvz7qxxdq HyGZpqiX8uTLVcSUoC0VN382i8wBN4CH0fkjg= Received: by 10.220.123.21 with SMTP id n21mr7154255vcr.134.1266814520245; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:55:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.146.181.200? ([32.137.184.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm28934497vws.14.2010.02.21.20.55.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:55:18 -0800 (PST) References: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> <7c962aed1002201404q71c4b820x1fdf16d8f473be88@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <63C0685C-E1BF-4223-91A8-4F58266A6B5E@gmail.com> From: Jay Booth To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002201404q71c4b820x1fdf16d8f473be88@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5H11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5H11) Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:55:09 -0500 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, since someone has to get the ball rolling as far as release masters, I'll nominate Stack and/or someone hbase related for 0.21 with the primary goal of being "soon"? They get a big win from append and others will gain from the expanded mapreduce lib, better schedulers, etc. There are a lot of new features and some major changes (project split) already in the 0.21 branch, so IMO it's worth considering a release with minimal backports, rather than make binding decisions about 0.22 before 0.21 is even in the wild. -Jay PS sorry Stack On Feb 20, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> Can we make a decision on basing 21 on the current branch and if it's >> decided that 22 can't remove stuff that was in 20 we'll go back and >> do >> the necessary additions on 21 and trunk? Suspect that decision will >> take a lot more back and forth, but needs to conclude before 21 is >> released. >> > > Lets. > > Regards 0.21/current-branch release, as has been suggested above, > first we need to figure the release master. No release master, no > release. If we have a release master, then I suggest we vote on > current branch being released as 0.21 as soon as the blockers are > cleared. > > I don't think we need muddy the above vote with whether or not 0.21 > maintains API combatibility with 0.20. IMO, it must (because Y! want > to have the 0.20 API in place when January 2011 rolls around). This > makes 0.21 a "minor" release -- something we've not done before (For > the record, I also had a misunderstanding that what we were doing up > to this was major and patch only). So, part of the release process > would involve ensuring no removed deprecations, etc. > > As DC has been saying, this requirement that releases between now and > January 2011 not change APIs makes 0.20 retroactively into a "major" > release. 0.20 is the release where major shifted left in our > versioning scheme and minor releases came into play. 0.21 and 0.22 > will be minor releases. Can we just acknowledge this fact, that there > was a step at version 0.20, update the wiki around versioning -- its > currently wrong anyways as Elis' points out -- and just move on? > Going back and calling 0.20 a 1.0 seems more apt to create confusion > and besides, I'm with Allen that hadoop 1.0 needs wire compatibility > before the 1.0 can roll around. > > Thanks, > St.Ack > P.S. +1 on branching as soon as avro and security are in, etc. From general-return-1078-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 08:41:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71191 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 08:41:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 08:41:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 37167 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 08:41:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37092 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 08:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37082 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 08:41:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:41:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:40:54 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:40:31 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:40:30 +0100 Subject: RE: Release plans Thread-Topic: Release plans Thread-Index: Acqze3xOn+NAZdG3TmO0bwZQzKBd/QAGu78w Message-ID: References: <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> <4B7F20FA.2050704@apache.org> <7c962aed1002201404q71c4b820x1fdf16d8f473be88@mail.gmail.com> <63C0685C-E1BF-4223-91A8-4F58266A6B5E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <63C0685C-E1BF-4223-91A8-4F58266A6B5E@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003A_01CAB3A3.12F57DC0" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CAB3A3.12F57DC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm sorry for breaking into your discussion as an outsider, but I'm very curious about the security features you are planning to roll out in March. Where can I find information about this? Best regards, Evert Lammerts > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Booth [mailto:jaybooth@gmail.com] > Sent: maandag 22 februari 2010 5:55 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release plans > > Well, since someone has to get the ball rolling as far as release > masters, I'll nominate Stack and/or someone hbase related for 0.21 > with the primary goal of being "soon"? They get a big win from append > and others will gain from the expanded mapreduce lib, better > schedulers, etc. There are a lot of new features and some major > changes (project split) already in the 0.21 branch, so IMO it's worth > considering a release with minimal backports, rather than make binding > decisions about 0.22 before 0.21 is even in the wild. > > -Jay > > PS sorry Stack > > On Feb 20, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Stack wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Eli Collins > wrote: > >> Can we make a decision on basing 21 on the current branch and if > it's > >> decided that 22 can't remove stuff that was in 20 we'll go back and > >> do > >> the necessary additions on 21 and trunk? Suspect that decision will > >> take a lot more back and forth, but needs to conclude before 21 is > >> released. > >> > > > > Lets. > > > > Regards 0.21/current-branch release, as has been suggested above, > > first we need to figure the release master. No release master, no > > release. If we have a release master, then I suggest we vote on > > current branch being released as 0.21 as soon as the blockers are > > cleared. > > > > I don't think we need muddy the above vote with whether or not 0.21 > > maintains API combatibility with 0.20. IMO, it must (because Y! want > > to have the 0.20 API in place when January 2011 rolls around). This > > makes 0.21 a "minor" release -- something we've not done before (For > > the record, I also had a misunderstanding that what we were doing up > > to this was major and patch only). So, part of the release process > > would involve ensuring no removed deprecations, etc. > > > > As DC has been saying, this requirement that releases between now and > > January 2011 not change APIs makes 0.20 retroactively into a "major" > > release. 0.20 is the release where major shifted left in our > > versioning scheme and minor releases came into play. 0.21 and 0.22 > > will be minor releases. Can we just acknowledge this fact, that there > > was a step at version 0.20, update the wiki around versioning -- its > > currently wrong anyways as Elis' points out -- and just move on? > > Going back and calling 0.20 a 1.0 seems more apt to create confusion > > and besides, I'm with Allen that hadoop 1.0 needs wire compatibility > > before the 1.0 can roll around. > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > P.S. +1 on branching as soon as avro and security are in, etc. ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CAB3A3.12F57DC0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDIyMjA4NDAzMVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFO9qyUsH urYB3V0r+3w8xeu9BtwGMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAqNuavFkJJoCE1dqsfTg8fSApcgG7m9per4jZ9OdM5GQdAuHRQrG13DYvNERwfOd5iRffrsi5 KPwslXQDM9oBsLWK9+TV8e2RnbhjAgM1jmMZFNYbc0bgjzQpfPG0Ezdn2NaYfHHtZ619q8yAkJX1 kybINGCDcxH4/bh7beZ5yBVPHPbFvBaVQA/7KQdc99tYqHiOdn0s6GDi9SAHKAFNXUja0C4whwEH dJERpKaKVsEKmOewywnaVYg6lGHF66Rh1H0Jwnts0phuv2dTJdSBWc6Sua8SMy0G4kHTZbJ2eMbZ rxSfVwDqk97rgh6OuHD7LED3I8/YRSE9PJ6CtCTXUgAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_003A_01CAB3A3.12F57DC0-- From general-return-1079-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 16:20:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61629 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 16:20:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 16:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 65159 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 16:20:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65096 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 16:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65086 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 16:20:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:20:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:20:00 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so488619qwi.35 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:19:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.227.5 with SMTP id iy5mr351098qcb.29.1266855579246; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:19:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:19:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Security roadmap [Was: Release plans] From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b82f0c862bd048032cce7 --0016363b82f0c862bd048032cce7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4487. Please start a new thread next time. On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote: > I'm sorry for breaking into your discussion as an outsider, but I'm very > curious about the security features you are planning to roll out in March. > Where can I find information about this? > > Best regards, > Evert Lammerts > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jay Booth [mailto:jaybooth@gmail.com] > > Sent: maandag 22 februari 2010 5:55 > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Release plans > > > > Well, since someone has to get the ball rolling as far as release > > masters, I'll nominate Stack and/or someone hbase related for 0.21 > > with the primary goal of being "soon"? They get a big win from append > > and others will gain from the expanded mapreduce lib, better > > schedulers, etc. There are a lot of new features and some major > > changes (project split) already in the 0.21 branch, so IMO it's worth > > considering a release with minimal backports, rather than make binding > > decisions about 0.22 before 0.21 is even in the wild. > > > > -Jay > > > > PS sorry Stack > > > > On Feb 20, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Stack wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Eli Collins > > wrote: > > >> Can we make a decision on basing 21 on the current branch and if > > it's > > >> decided that 22 can't remove stuff that was in 20 we'll go back and > > >> do > > >> the necessary additions on 21 and trunk? Suspect that decision will > > >> take a lot more back and forth, but needs to conclude before 21 is > > >> released. > > >> > > > > > > Lets. > > > > > > Regards 0.21/current-branch release, as has been suggested above, > > > first we need to figure the release master. No release master, no > > > release. If we have a release master, then I suggest we vote on > > > current branch being released as 0.21 as soon as the blockers are > > > cleared. > > > > > > I don't think we need muddy the above vote with whether or not 0.21 > > > maintains API combatibility with 0.20. IMO, it must (because Y! want > > > to have the 0.20 API in place when January 2011 rolls around). This > > > makes 0.21 a "minor" release -- something we've not done before (For > > > the record, I also had a misunderstanding that what we were doing up > > > to this was major and patch only). So, part of the release process > > > would involve ensuring no removed deprecations, etc. > > > > > > As DC has been saying, this requirement that releases between now and > > > January 2011 not change APIs makes 0.20 retroactively into a "major" > > > release. 0.20 is the release where major shifted left in our > > > versioning scheme and minor releases came into play. 0.21 and 0.22 > > > will be minor releases. Can we just acknowledge this fact, that there > > > was a step at version 0.20, update the wiki around versioning -- its > > > currently wrong anyways as Elis' points out -- and just move on? > > > Going back and calling 0.20 a 1.0 seems more apt to create confusion > > > and besides, I'm with Allen that hadoop 1.0 needs wire compatibility > > > before the 1.0 can roll around. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > P.S. +1 on branching as soon as avro and security are in, etc. > --0016363b82f0c862bd048032cce7-- From general-return-1080-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 22 17:56:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6668 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2010 17:56:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2010 17:56:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 44020 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 17:56:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43951 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2010 17:56:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43941 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2010 17:56:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:56:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.243] (HELO qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:56:24 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id l3Bd1d0041uE5Es5D5w3mK; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:56:04 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id l5yH1d0132SbwD53c5yLGT; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:58:25 +0000 Message-Id: <8A9082CB-8E27-4904-AADA-7894C0190177@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Security roadmap [Was: Release plans] Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:55:52 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Evert Lammerts wrote: > I'm sorry for breaking into your discussion as an outsider, but I'm > very > curious about the security features you are planning to roll out in > March. At a high level, all of the interactions with HDFS and MapReduce will be authenticated. Kerberos will be used as the base authentication, but there are mechanisms to ensure that MapReduce jobs launching won't cause a DOS against the Kerberos KDC. Yahoo is pushing hard for getting this deployed this summer. We are backporting all of the work on to our Yahoo 0.20 branch and will be posting it to github. -- Owen From general-return-1081-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 01:46:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54929 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 01:46:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 01:46:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 57150 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 01:46:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57079 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 01:46:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57069 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 01:46:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:46:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.3 required=10.0 tests=FS_START_DOYOU2,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:46:29 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1N1k6dK043928 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:46:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=Qc8y1/6aP3e0T8UpAqD+UHQLjIEtrvZm8AwmN2B7f2vEnwGu9s/57wP5wei99kPG Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Do you have what it takes to test Hadoop? Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:46:05 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks, we are looking for outstanding software engineers and architects who are interested in quality and testing. Please spread the word. Details on how to apply are here: http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2010/02/do_you_have_what_it_takes_to_t.html Cheers, Nigel From general-return-1082-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 06:10:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49313 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 06:10:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 06:10:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 10410 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 06:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10310 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 06:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10290 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 06:10:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:10:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:10:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 49107 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 06:10:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:10:11 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2367552bwz.29 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:10:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.0.84 with SMTP id 20mr3478099bka.5.1266905409726; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:10:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:10:09 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002222210h154cc911gd6c9ee992a09f50e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sending a gentle reminder to PMC members to vote on this release and to devs and users to test it out. -C On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > Please try it out. -C > From general-return-1083-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 07:53:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96467 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 07:53:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 07:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 2365 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 07:53:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2295 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 07:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2285 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 07:53:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:53:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:53:00 +0000 Received: by gwaa11 with SMTP id a11so391021gwa.35 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/d+dPg19eZo7CDnAhDUuTpHe8bqjdNyxXnYSnEX2fco=; b=QYQHXyEM0XUzup6WiYBE+MOW+fjJb1gXSdzh8M7RbXfNpPemfCwmyp/gDUdwqCG/oX I9II3AUzVmtgDkc3gVraVMGPb4N9Woh1O+4I/cuGq2Xu2UyFB4GEmxXuMwPUk4sBOm+M pzIn5UXBoJQ0gxC6FiAy8gvaHwLUU3r80rmno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Ixmm9bGLuuMobqAwX0yIaqkuqCMwqGbjC29BbG2HeOsiNfEnQ+sJncX8QFuR/4LQ2X 60jGh1Q2hojGRUV61MpdcLnxAGgexyATRgnPIqTWOgMViLV9FZF/gOSASp1xoOo2YXsr iaolGDqAHge9mBAOQalaCWIyjnGscqc8TQRJc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.117.26 with SMTP id p26mr4846065ybc.348.1266911558292; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:52:38 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd72a1864d57304803fd5a4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd72a1864d57304803fd5a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. -dhruba On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: > +1 > > I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled > logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look > grand. > > St.Ack > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas > wrote: > > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > > > Please try it out. -C > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd72a1864d57304803fd5a4-- From general-return-1084-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 18:50:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13459 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 18:50:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 18:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 99074 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 18:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98993 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 18:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98983 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 18:50:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:50:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:50:48 +0000 Received: by pvd12 with SMTP id 12so425502pvd.35 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:50:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.213.39 with SMTP id p39mr4258037rvq.100.1266951026393; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:50:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:50:06 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be added there if he is going to sign releases. I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. -Todd On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote= : > +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. > > -dhruba > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I put up on a small cluster under load. =A0Seems to work fine. =A0Trolle= d >> logs a while. =A0Nothing out of the ordinary. =A0Checked docs. =A0They l= ook >> grand. >> >> St.Ack >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >> wrote: >> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >> > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >> > >> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >> > >> > Please try it out. -C >> > >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > From general-return-1085-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 20:07:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53075 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 20:07:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 20:07:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 25595 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 20:07:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25497 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 20:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25477 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 20:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:07:29 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.198] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c187.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.187]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1NK5iVH051144; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:05:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:x-priority:references: message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=y7LKgFrFvXS1QISp9AN35KwngL8lOBoAZRE1nPBB2pHtGz7EDyINEyB5kAaYoWt/ From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <466AB331-82A3-4111-BA34-75F44A31DBCF@yahoo-inc.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 X-Priority: 3 References: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> <14B7BB1E-F459-4FBC-AEBD-120B822281E3@yahoo-inc.com> <1E049E93BEE249D59D88B0DDACEF9106@DanielLaptop> <466AB331-82A3-4111-BA34-75F44A31DBCF@yahoo-inc.com> Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:05:44 -0800 Cc: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) I have rolled a new version of the tarball that has the version command correct. I did not make any code changes, I just needed to run ant with the correct properties set. So I have not made this a new release candidate. So the candidate is at the same place as before, http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ Please try it out and vote by Friday, February 26th. Thanks. Alan. On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Alright, I'll fix that and reroll the release. > > Alan. > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > >> "pig -version" should report 0.6.0 instead of 0.6.1. +1 otherwise. >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Alan Gates" >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM >> To: >> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >> >>> PMC members, >>> >>> Please take a look and vote. Thanks. >>> >>> Alan. >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Alan Gates >>>> Date: February 16, 2010 11:22:52 AM PST >>>> To: >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>>> Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it >>>> to http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ >>>> A description of what is new and different in this release is >>>> included in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to >>>> that directory. Please download the candidate, test it, and vote. >>>> >>>> Alan. > From general-return-1086-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 20:56:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68165 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 20:56:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 20:56:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11902 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 20:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11815 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 20:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11805 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 20:56:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:56:11 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1NKruuk075365 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:53:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=CF5XNKikZb1vG0hfkOpcgRNK9yDQ8wPjOP9a2J3RxZBwxRcoi5cAVNm8I0YBlpAz Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:53:56 -0800 From: Ravi Phulari To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:53:54 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? Thread-Index: Acq0XW5lIPPM8dk9QaioNEUfwFmHDgAbODgp Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7A9806216DABrphulariyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C7A9806216DABrphulariyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Release looks good. Successfully ran unit tests , Executed Mapred word count program , verified= user documentation. - Ravi On 2/22/10 11:52 PM, "Dhruba Borthakur" wrote: +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. -dhruba On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: > +1 > > I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled > logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look > grand. > > St.Ack > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas > wrote: > > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > > > Please try it out. -C > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba Ravi -- --_000_C7A9806216DABrphulariyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1087-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 21:33:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90142 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 86660 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 21:33:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86589 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 21:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86579 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 21:33:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:33:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:33:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 89926 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 21:32:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:32:57 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3125605bwz.29 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:32:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.69 with SMTP id b5mr3245166bka.196.1266960775297; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:32:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:32:54 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I looked around, and found this repository of public keys: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no documentation on that point. We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include MAPREDUCE-587= -C On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 > Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in > http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be > added there if he is going to sign releases. > > I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus > failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from > that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a > pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. > > Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should > release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 > before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. > > So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wro= te: >> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. >> >> -dhruba >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I put up on a small cluster under load. =A0Seems to work fine. =A0Troll= ed >>> logs a while. =A0Nothing out of the ordinary. =A0Checked docs. =A0They = look >>> grand. >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >>> wrote: >>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >>> > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >>> > >>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >>> > >>> > Please try it out. -C >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >> > From general-return-1088-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 21:37:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91844 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 21:37:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 21:37:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 93649 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 21:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93588 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 21:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93578 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 21:37:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:37:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:37:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 91703 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 21:37:00 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:37:00 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3128697bwz.29 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:36:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.155.69 with SMTP id r5mr955420bkw.0.1266961017783; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:36:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> <14B7BB1E-F459-4FBC-AEBD-120B822281E3@yahoo-inc.com> <1E049E93BEE249D59D88B0DDACEF9106@DanielLaptop> <466AB331-82A3-4111-BA34-75F44A31DBCF@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:36:57 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002231336m657adf5oac3734bd36f3b323@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 I ran the unit tests on the first version of the RC and all passed. MD5 and signature of this build match. -C On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > I have rolled a new version of the tarball that has the version command > correct. =A0I did not make any code changes, I just needed to run ant wit= h the > correct properties set. =A0So I have not made this a new release candidat= e. > =A0So the candidate is at the same place as before, > http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ > > Please try it out and vote by Friday, February 26th. =A0Thanks. > > Alan. > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > >> Alright, I'll fix that and reroll the release. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: >> >>> "pig -version" should report 0.6.0 instead of 0.6.1. +1 otherwise. >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Alan Gates" >>> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM >>> To: >>> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>> >>>> PMC members, >>>> >>>> Please take a look and vote. =A0Thanks. >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>>> From: Alan Gates >>>>> Date: February 16, 2010 11:22:52 AM PST >>>>> To: >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>>>> Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ >>>>> A description of what is new and different in this release is =A0incl= uded >>>>> in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that =A0directory= . Please >>>>> download the candidate, test it, and vote. >>>>> >>>>> Alan. >> > > From general-return-1089-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:09:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8785 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:09:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:09:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 42362 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42293 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42283 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:09:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:09:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.160 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.160] (HELO e39.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:09:12 +0000 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1NM1A51023705 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:01:10 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1NM8YYu034552 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:08:36 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1NM8XHU026758 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:08:33 -0700 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1NM8Xml026739 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:08:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? X-KeepSent: F388BED4:4E9FA0BC-862576D3:0079591D; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:08:31 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 02/23/2010 15:08:32, Serialize complete at 02/23/2010 15:08:32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0079A185862576D3_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0079A185862576D3_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ? Kind regards Steve Watt From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: 02/23/2010 03:34 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? I looked around, and found this repository of public keys: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no documentation on that point. We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include MAPREDUCE-587 -C On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 > Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in > http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be > added there if he is going to sign releases. > > I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus > failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from > that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a > pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. > > Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should > release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 > before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. > > So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. >> >> -dhruba >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I put up on a small cluster under load. Seems to work fine. Trolled >>> logs a while. Nothing out of the ordinary. Checked docs. They look >>> grand. >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >>> wrote: >>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >>> > >>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >>> > >>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >>> > >>> > Please try it out. -C >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >> > --=_alternative 0079A185862576D3_=-- From general-return-1090-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:13:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10666 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:13:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:13:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 49906 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49829 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49819 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:13:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:13:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:12:52 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so3843634pwi.35 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:12:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.107.3 with SMTP id j3mr554802rvm.271.1266963152143; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:12:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:12:12 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002231412i51d3c79fre9c67436b721dcf1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number, and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1. So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week. Thanks -Todd On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt wrote: > Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have > observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the > generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually > releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ? > > Kind regards > Steve Watt > > > > From: > Chris Douglas > To: > general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: > 02/23/2010 03:34 PM > Subject: > Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? > > > > I looked around, and found this repository of public keys: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS > > I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no > documentation on that point. > > We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include > MAPREDUCE-587 -C > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 >> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in >> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be >> added there if he is going to sign releases. >> >> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus >> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from >> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a >> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. >> >> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should >> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 >> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. >> >> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur > wrote: >>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. >>> >>> -dhruba >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. =A0Seems to work fine. =A0Trol= led >>>> logs a while. =A0Nothing out of the ordinary. =A0Checked docs. =A0They= look >>>> grand. >>>> >>>> St.Ack >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >>>> wrote: >>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >>>> > >>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >>>> > >>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >>>> > >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >>>> > >>>> > Please try it out. -C >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>> >> > > > From general-return-1091-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:15:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11537 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:15:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:15:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 59715 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59665 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:15:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59655 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:15:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:15:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:15:27 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1NMEgb6010814 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:14:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=hcwXRyhubncqjOrULu9ohB6YBbkCYBvFxHVnXSIlJfQOntHjUrSahQ8hM+ufx0XO Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:14:42 -0800 References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 Downloaded, verified checksums and ran tests. The usual suspects failed, none of which are blockers. Arun On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities > > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 > > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 > > Please try it out. -C From general-return-1092-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14985 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:22:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70942 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70866 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70856 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:44 +0000 Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lVxv1d0051wfjNsADaNRoQ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:25 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id laN91d00P2SbwD58jaNCYC; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:19 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:22:07 -0800 References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1. Downloaded, verified the md5 and gpg signed. Ran word count on a 1 node cluster. -- Owen From general-return-1093-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:28:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17742 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:28:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:28:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 77109 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:28:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77049 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:28:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77039 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:28:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:28:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:28:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 17465 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:27:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:27:56 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so3164296bwz.29 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:27:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.39.211 with SMTP id h19mr1519719bke.164.1266964074458; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:27:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71002231412i51d3c79fre9c67436b721dcf1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231412i51d3c79fre9c67436b721dcf1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:27:54 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002231427i5f1d54c4n3f3fad20f19e6cf2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The rules are here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes This says that one cannot veto a release, but 3 days should be sufficient for everyone to test it out and find problems. If nobody finds anything sufficient to block the release, I'll try to push it on Wednesday or Thursday. -C On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC > members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one > of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number, > and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before > closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1. > > So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week. > > Thanks > -Todd > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt wrote: >> Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to have >> observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the >> generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actually >> releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ? >> >> Kind regards >> Steve Watt >> >> >> >> From: >> Chris Douglas >> To: >> general@hadoop.apache.org >> Date: >> 02/23/2010 03:34 PM >> Subject: >> Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? >> >> >> >> I looked around, and found this repository of public keys: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS >> >> I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no >> documentation on that point. >> >> We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include >> MAPREDUCE-587 -C >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 >>> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in >>> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be >>> added there if he is going to sign releases. >>> >>> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus >>> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from >>> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a >>> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. >>> >>> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should >>> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 >>> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. >>> >>> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur >> wrote: >>>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. >>>> >>>> -dhruba >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. =A0Seems to work fine. =A0Tro= lled >>>>> logs a while. =A0Nothing out of the ordinary. =A0Checked docs. =A0The= y look >>>>> grand. >>>>> >>>>> St.Ack >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >>>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >>>>> > >>>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >>>>> > >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >>>>> > >>>>> > Please try it out. -C >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>> >>> >> >> >> > From general-return-1094-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 22:52:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30005 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 22:52:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:52:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 8161 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:52:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8118 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 22:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8108 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:52:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:52:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:52:43 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1NMpTPA027315 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:51:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=h86R7iaX1ezARQQqtA3W6m4dH+2WUaoGWeLNQHQUDet7TFs4+Nb2sZB/DZfy7U5s Message-Id: From: Sanjay Radia To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:51:29 -0800 References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 19, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Doug Cutting > wrote: >> Eli Collins wrote: >>>> >>>> My concern is more about when the next branch from trunk will be >>>> made. >>> >>> Does there need to be a dependency? >> >> No. I just wanted to note that, from my point of view, releasing >> from the >> existing 0.21 branch is not sufficient, that, regardless, we still >> need to >> release from trunk soon, and we need a schedule going forward for >> when >> future branches from trunk will be made. >> > > Agreed. Releasing a 21 won't settle the release process question or > tell us when the first major release is. Maybe we could get 21 behind > us and have a separate discussion covering those. > >>> Could the vote on whether 22 is backwards compatible with 20 be >>> independent of what we call 1.0? >> >> We minimally need to declare whether releases are major or minor. > > I was assuming 21 would be another minor release, didn't hear > otherwise when it was branched. I didn't interpret the compatibility > vote as a suggestion that we should retroactively consider 20 to be > the first major release, but rather a suggestion for voting that we > don't remove APIs in 22 that were deprecated in 20. Agreed. Rather than renaming versions, lets vote on the compatibility rules for 22: 22 is API compatible with 20. > Owen, please > correct me if I'm wrong. > > Thanks, > Eli From general-return-1095-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 23 23:35:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48635 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2010 23:35:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2010 23:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 65338 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 23:35:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65256 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2010 23:35:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65246 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 23:35:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:35:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:35:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 48576 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 23:34:53 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:34:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4B84661C.1000600@apache.org> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:34:52 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release plans References: <4B7D9503.4080205@apache.org> <7c962aed1002182036l7db697ahcdc581fde3619405@mail.gmail.com> <4B7F0985.3010000@apache.org> <4B7F157C.1090305@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sanjay Radia wrote: > Rather than renaming versions, lets vote on the compatibility rules for > 22: 22 is API compatible with 20. I think if we elect to go this way then we should make the rule more general, i.e.: all releases after 0.20 are to be API-compatible with 0.20 until we state otherwise (probably 1.0). If we both release 0.21 as currently branched and we branch 0.22 from trunk in a few weeks, then we might want to have an API-compatible 0.23 too. Doug From general-return-1096-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 24 05:27:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86620 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 05:27:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 05:27:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 78888 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 05:27:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78781 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 05:27:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12024 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2010 22:53:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1266965607; bh=q9YlvEMaYdSQ2+tocvqL1GwxX9Dh9A2WOIc2UwHOAkE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LEuP8XQzKDdeetX41XCh7D0OVwE70jzckMIkt9EQZmdDk7Vj7hp1gCHrQVLqrNh3RlbAVRokV0mFvSfpBm3HWVtypuHkqR2LLoObZ7uxNvONSssx49xsVkW8fVdeshfLjRqgNNPr5zLcfWC1K8zzs7sNvEgWP0DK17o9n5xPCSc= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tTKFXBUk3hpCOL5L5l3c/AW8ewNB/uuPipX7Fe7bp2GJuUMA902aYoj3zCedqpPSm5Gu+EtSbFmK4A0avj4ArlHxTQBkVoBAJGE15NnuCuAhrzrjAVxdE8vJTx/bIHsdmYoB7it38rcoAVNDS7oudIEoQvGVKIUMUR/LL4/iDyU=; Message-ID: <311992.9657.qm@web58701.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3Eerq4wVM1nwO07t_CqlvI6OZ_eJHF6ELaa4AnQN2DLkZ4B aJEPrErmp3hn12g3GHb4R82bxKSLMeIl4C9EYA9N_O2vGeUKelGLRGfiRbz0 F7FdRGLsycUoLAaHI_DHukOJyKucyQPcHQcGTMM37C4zFwyjBxmqZZV2Ky5C SNNu5dkWJLgx4SYmQTz9qybud9m5D5LmCAKmW9fbDwhpwukuRtzpgbvo7wrb 3iVgh8UnDJb9bsCty0QYJq6NW3IX5hbqFN2QXj54hH_jL1eK2iI3hkec2NXz ASH.NFOuvw9PzysQvSGev9cVcIWlt2As.wE94BOunuxJ7utLJgFcLYJ.WWzn rI.rD09OnaLH0aGXfLNcYbXEAxVAjdCWbrUX9DKalc38fIr6D X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/300.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <3316F847-FBB7-4D41-B1A7-C5CD3FB1A40D@yahoo-inc.com> <14B7BB1E-F459-4FBC-AEBD-120B822281E3@yahoo-inc.com> <1E049E93BEE249D59D88B0DDACEF9106@DanielLaptop> <466AB331-82A3-4111-BA34-75F44A31DBCF@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:53:27 -0800 (PST) From: Pradeep Kamath Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 To: private@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-231140451-1266965607=:9657" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-231140451-1266965607=:9657 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +1, md5 matches - extracted and ran simple scripts in local and map reduce mode - ran "ant test-commit" sucessfully. ________________________________ From: Alan Gates To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tue, February 23, 2010 12:05:44 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 I have rolled a new version of the tarball that has the version command correct. I did not make any code changes, I just needed to run ant with the correct properties set. So I have not made this a new release candidate. So the candidate is at the same place as before, http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ Please try it out and vote by Friday, February 26th. Thanks. Alan. On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Alright, I'll fix that and reroll the release. > > Alan. > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > >> "pig -version" should report 0.6.0 instead of 0.6.1. +1 otherwise. >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Alan Gates" >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:58 AM >> To: >> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >> >>> PMC members, >>> >>> Please take a look and vote. Thanks. >>> >>> Alan. >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Alan Gates >>>> Date: February 16, 2010 11:22:52 AM PST >>>> To: >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 >>>> Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I have rolled a release candidate for Pig 0.6.0 and uploaded it to http://people.apache.org/~gates/pig-0.6.0-candidate-1/ >>>> A description of what is new and different in this release is included in the release notes, which I have also uploaded to that directory. Please download the candidate, test it, and vote. >>>> >>>> Alan. > --0-231140451-1266965607=:9657-- From general-return-1097-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 24 08:58:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66525 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 08:58:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 08:58:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 70158 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 08:58:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70081 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 08:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69750 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2010 08:58:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:58:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:58:46 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkD3A-0000pb-Jl for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:56:56 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: additional source only release tarball Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:53:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I've packaged hadoop for Debian. (It's still in the upload queue for verification[1]). One common annoyance when packaging java applications for a Free Software distribution is the necessity to repackage the upstream tarball. The repackaging is necessary, because Debian may only distribute binary files build from source that's also available from Debian. So we build the jar/war files ourselfes to make sure there's nothing we don't have the sources for. It would take one (annoying and time consuming) step less for packagers, if java upstream projects would release an additional tarball without any binary files or third party code. I'm asking you first, because many other projects (like zookeeper) took or take hadoop as an example for their build infrastructure. For your orientation, these are the patterns that I used to filter the hadoop tarball: (Usable with tar --exclude) "*.jar", "uming.*", "prototype.js", "config.sub", "config.guess", "ltmain.sh", "Makefile.in", "configure", "aclocal.m4", "config.h.in", "install-sh", "autom4te.cache", "depcomp", "missing", "pipes/compile", "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.jpg", "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.png", "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.gif", "hadoop-0.20.1/src/core/org/apache/hadoop/record/compiler/generated/*.java", "hadoop-0.20.1/src/docs/cn/build", "hadoop-0.20.1/c++", "hadoop-0.20.1/contrib", "hadoop-0.20.1/lib/native", "hadoop-0.20.1/librecordio", "hadoop-0.20.1/src/contrib/thriftfs/gen-*", "hadoop-0.20.1/docs", There were different reasons why stuff needed to be filtered: - unclear license (uming.*) - unclear origin (images in the eclipse plugin) - precompiled documentation / code / hadoop binaries - pregenerated C/C++ automake files - third party libraries (prototype.js, lib/*.jar) If you'd be willing to release an additional tarball like this, I'd provide the necessary patch to your build.xml [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1098-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 24 16:29:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75876 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 16:29:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 16:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24162 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 16:29:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24104 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 16:29:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24094 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2010 16:29:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:29:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:28:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c173.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.173]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1OGSOvV031403; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:28:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=amTB+dTwMeRD2gC39UHr6D3K6u8JMJrAr+1IPt0ea9Wy23lvtDxG105mA3hFLbaZ Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: , In-Reply-To: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:28:23 -0800 References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This seems reasonable, anyone else? Thomas, could you, please, open a jira and attach your patch to build.xml there? I have some comments on some of your exclude patterns, but we can have that discussion on the jira. thanks, Arun On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I've packaged hadoop for Debian. (It's still in the upload queue for > verification[1]). > One common annoyance when packaging java applications for a Free > Software > distribution is the necessity to repackage the upstream tarball. The > repackaging is necessary, because Debian may only distribute binary > files > build from source that's also available from Debian. > So we build the jar/war files ourselfes to make sure there's nothing > we don't > have the sources for. > It would take one (annoying and time consuming) step less for > packagers, if > java upstream projects would release an additional tarball without > any binary > files or third party code. > I'm asking you first, because many other projects (like zookeeper) > took or > take hadoop as an example for their build infrastructure. > For your orientation, these are the patterns that I used to filter > the hadoop > tarball: (Usable with tar --exclude) > > "*.jar", > "uming.*", > "prototype.js", > "config.sub", > "config.guess", > "ltmain.sh", > "Makefile.in", > "configure", > "aclocal.m4", > "config.h.in", > "install-sh", > "autom4te.cache", > "depcomp", > "missing", > "pipes/compile", > "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.jpg", > "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.png", > "src/contrib/eclipse-plugin/resources/*.gif", > "hadoop-0.20.1/src/core/org/apache/hadoop/record/compiler/generated/ > *.java", > "hadoop-0.20.1/src/docs/cn/build", > "hadoop-0.20.1/c++", > "hadoop-0.20.1/contrib", > "hadoop-0.20.1/lib/native", > "hadoop-0.20.1/librecordio", > "hadoop-0.20.1/src/contrib/thriftfs/gen-*", > "hadoop-0.20.1/docs", > > There were different reasons why stuff needed to be filtered: > - unclear license (uming.*) > - unclear origin (images in the eclipse plugin) > - precompiled documentation / code / hadoop binaries > - pregenerated C/C++ automake files > - third party libraries (prototype.js, lib/*.jar) > > If you'd be willing to release an additional tarball like this, I'd > provide > the necessary patch to your build.xml > > [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > Best regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1099-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 24 21:54:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48380 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2010 21:54:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2010 21:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27950 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27874 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27864 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2010 21:54:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:54:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:54:46 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,534,1262592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="16110821" Received: from emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 24 Feb 2010 13:54:26 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([169.254.2.77]) by emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:54:25 -0800 From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" CC: "Taylor, Ronald C" , "Trease, Harold E" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:54:25 -0800 Subject: Is there Hadoop support for parallel reading of a compressed video file - say as *.tar or *.zip file? Thread-Topic: Is there Hadoop support for parallel reading of a compressed video file - say as *.tar or *.zip file? Thread-Index: Acq1m+2OgYjg/iBNS2isS3Y+FSOfQg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010639E135CBEMAIL05pnlg_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010639E135CBEMAIL05pnlg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Hadoop list, We need to process huge files of video quickly in Hadoop. Think, for exampl= e, of a 100 Gb YouTube video file being uploaded to our cluster in *.tar o= r *.zip format. We need a reader, I presume some variant on LineRecordReade= r, that can automatically split the file appropriately between a set of Map= pers, one Mapper per node. I did a quick Google search and found something about work being done on a = BZip2 compressed text file reader - the email mentions this work as issue H= ADOOP-4012. Could anybody tell me the state of such work, or of similar wor= k for *.zip and *.tar files? Is there any working code available? Also: more generally, we need Hadoop-based code that can automatically spli= t (compressed) video files at appropriate boundaries for processing in para= llel. Our group would deeply appreciate any guidance pointing toward curren= t Hadoop work in this area. Cheers, Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov --_000_A632B3F93D861843A3C966F3962C3F84010639E135CBEMAIL05pnlg_-- From general-return-1100-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 13:21:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30988 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 13:21:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 13:21:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 39481 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 13:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39426 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 13:21:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39418 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 13:21:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:21:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:21:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B71CB7E9E for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:20:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hOZFv3nj7pJW for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:20:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CDCB7E9D for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:20:54 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1267708843.9569@raricJWinZ9uo6WVx+WQ5A Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o1PDKfkn014480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:20:43 GMT Message-ID: <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:20:41 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o1PDKfkn014480 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Arun C Murthy wrote: > This seems reasonable, anyone else? > > Thomas, could you, please, open a jira and attach your patch to > build.xml there? I have some comments on some of your exclude patterns, > but we can have that discussion on the jira. > > thanks, > Arun One thing I've discussed before is the whole notion of having some hadoop-redist project whose aim is to produce useful packaging/installation of the artifacts of the main Hadoop projects. -RPMs -Debs -stuff to help the various CM tools work w/ Hadoop -things to help is deploy and test at scale This may seem trivial, but it isn't. Right now my test process is * create my own RPMs * scp them to a machine with some scripts (that I don't run) to * ssh to that machine, run some scripts and create a VM disk image containing the RPMs and the installer scripts * bring up the controller front end to the infrastructure Then I run a junit test * Have htmlunit start talking to a web ui * through it, ask for 20 VMs * go get my 16th coffee of the day, assuming this is test run #14 (first two coffees are at home, one before the school run, the other while doing the first round of emails) * have the controller wait for the VMs to come up * as they do, for each one, run a thread that SSHs in and actually pushes out the Hadoop config based on the hostnames given to the different VMs * run terasort * grab the logs * teardown * merge the logs in with the rest of the junit output * try and work out why the test failed oh, and everything from the 20 vms onwards is started by junit test To make life more fun, that bit of [1] has to spin waiting for the DNS names to resolve, the machines to boot enough for SSH to work, then SSH in and spin there waiting for the installed programs to be on the path and then the CM tooling to be live. And feed the log of this not just to the local log4j log but (somehow) stream it back over the (remote) web ui that has to then live update the web page (this is surprisingly hard) Here's a bit of it, excluding the coffees PortUtils.waitForHostnameToResolve(hostname, factory.getPortConnectTimeout(), SLEEP_TIME_FOR_HOSTNAME_RESOLUTION); PortUtils.checkPort(hostname, factory.getPort(), factory.getPortConnectTimeout()); //some stuff creating SSH sessions, SCP-ing over files skipped //make a few attempts to find the startup command for (int i = 0; i < STARTUP_LOCATE_ATTEMPTS; i++) { commandsList.add("which " + SF_START + " || sleep " + STARTUP_SLEEP_TIME); } commandsList.add("which " + SF_START + " || echo " + ERROR_NO_EXECUTABLE + SF_START); String sfPing = makeSFCommand(SF_PING) + " " + "localhost"; for (int i = 0; i < STARTUP_PING_ATTEMPTS; i++) { commandsList.add(sfPing + " || sleep " + STARTUP_PING_SLEEP_TIME); } commandsList.add(sshCommand); commandsList.add("sleep " + SLEEP_TIME); if (!factory.isKeepFiles()) { commandsList.add("rm " + desttempfile); } commandsList.add("exit"); sshExec(session, commandsList); See that? fun. JUnit test cases that fail in interesting ways. Really interesting ways. Sometimes it's the infrastructure, sometimes it's my code. Sometimes, because I am working with SVN_HEAD, it's Hadoop. Problem is, it takes a while to track down, especially if the VMs are no longer there at the end of the run. Right now one of the problems is that none of Hadoop's JSP pages work. I can submit jobs, talk to the FS, etc, but all the JSP pages are failing and the root of every web is /webapps ; I think it's something that Todd's also seeing, but I can' t make it go away, not without fixing how Hadoop locates/registers webapps. Returning to the idea of a deployment project, having more tests that can be run against production clusters would be good: all the tests should be redistributables that you can deploy/run. There is something needed to QA a cluster, and ideally identify the approximate area where problems lie (e.g. DNS playing up, rDNS not working, clocks out of sync, etc) thoughts? -steve From general-return-1101-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 15:10:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88376 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 15:10:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 15:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 57856 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 15:10:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57812 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 15:10:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57800 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 15:10:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:10:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:10:39 +0000 Received: from 245-214.76-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.76.214.245] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkfKV-000350-6t; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:08:43 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Steve Loughran References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Steve, > One thing I've discussed before is the whole notion of having some > hadoop-redist project whose aim is to produce useful > packaging/installation of the artifacts of the main Hadoop projects. you may be interested in project-builder.org. It's a tool to integrate the building of distribution packages in a continuous integration workflow. There has been a presentation at the European Free Software conference FOSDEM: Continuous Packaging with Project-Builder.org http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2010/fosdem10/ Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1102-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 16:40:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22578 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 16:40:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 16:40:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 21290 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 16:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21223 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 16:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21213 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 16:40:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:40:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7814E1BA760 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9br9zM8CO0Qs for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58B61BA75F for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:28 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1267720758.20624@PKyasK0NPu7vVg+x6JyOcw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o1PGdGlj019600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:17 GMT Message-ID: <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:39:17 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o1PGdGlj019600 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi Steve, > >> One thing I've discussed before is the whole notion of having some >> hadoop-redist project whose aim is to produce useful >> packaging/installation of the artifacts of the main Hadoop projects. > you may be interested in project-builder.org. It's a tool to integrate the > building of distribution packages in a continuous integration workflow. There > has been a presentation at the European Free Software conference FOSDEM: > > Continuous Packaging with Project-Builder.org > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2010/fosdem10/ > > Best regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro thanks, I'll look at it. I do have the CI tools creating RPMs right now, scp-ing to VMs, though the fact that the rpm tools (especially rpm -qf to verify that a file exists/is managed) doesn't return error/success codes, so I have to grab the ssh output and scan for error strings, which we all think is wrong. From general-return-1103-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 17:26:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44631 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 17:26:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 17:26:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7557 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7466 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59994 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 06:40:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of susheel.varma@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TRqXDMnXE+TEIiosI5cxg+tSNsmST4plzvx5IdSrhaM=; b=D1QBBpto4g//0nI9X50UlHUFO/Xo6HNsT16JcmFBJqTaMNrnwhPOIQ18/rhhCfL7Oe b1Fieka5Y1UvGLrB+fr5Sp1gLWkH74VDWzICRaigd8awu6TlPRkSnWqwv/xPnSdjJjxv b8UpXvCJR/GswNF1+6GT+pbfSgWdW8pxp1iAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=k+OGiPiUtoY1DJCEdA2vgtAuSR/HW2uwoDg/Ul8hVdm0G7H8iu/3C5r/8IPevfbwc4 MsX6SYok+Z2a55dy/D75MR/cVQ086yLanDGviHSlEDYZHduyexh9mdEtCaPTlFsSoKso Lajs1t542cwBh7omSfTGR20DYsK4HqM3InzWo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:39:56 +0000 Message-ID: <7488e7731002242239u10b7d870r17983d03efed647e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Metadata, Daemons, Benchmarks, Web UI From: Susheel Varma To: general Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, We are trying evaluate a small set of distributed data management solutions(iRODS, HDFS, Lustre) for our project. We don't really have a need for scalable computation, but rather our focus is more on redundancy, reliability and security. Although small bits computation would be needed at some level. We have just begun an evaluation of HDFS, however this has thrown up a few questions(a good thing, I guess): 1. Metadata & Links a. Is there a way to add/update/remove metadata held on the NameNode? Examp= les? b. Is there a way to get hold of the metadata held on the NameNode? I'd like to allow users to search the HDFS using the the metadata, and then resolve the query to actual link to the file. If a or b is not possible, I would have to resort to using an HBase to store the custom metadata.=C2=A0Examples? 2. Daemons a. Is there a way to setup a daemon job(map-reduce, or otherwise) to listen for filesystem events and trigger actions that need to be performed on these files? Examples? b. If not, Is there an FSEvent API I could use? Examples? 3. Benchmarks a. Are there any un/published HDFS filesystem benchmarks using IOZone, PostMark etc.=C2=A0I know almost all FS benchmarks must be taken with a pinch of salt, but I'd really like to see the quantitative comparisons with Lustre for example. 4. Web UI a. Is there a simple way to augment the NameNode Web UI to allow users to login, search and download the files on the backend filesystem? Examples? b. If not, could you show me examples where users have combined a web application to serve files store on the HDFS? Thanks Susheel From general-return-1104-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 17:32:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47866 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 16795 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16715 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16702 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:32:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:31:56 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.249] (wifi-e-135-249.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1PHVXGh011197; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:31:33 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thomas, not sure if this solves all your issues but have you considered using SVN rather than the release tarball? The latest versions of Hadoop and ZooKeeper have moved to ant/ivy, while HBase has moved to Maven (and ZooKeeper has been considering moving to Maven at some point). As a result I'm not sure how much overlap there will be going forward wrt a common build... If you use the release tag from SVN you are guaranteed to get the same source as is contained in the release artifact. However the release artifact contains additional things like lib dependencies (typically the results of "ant package" or "ant tar") By moving to SVN you would guarantee that you have the same source but since ivy/maven are used to pull the dependencies (for the most part, there may be some exceptions) you'd essentially get what you are looking for. Patrick Steve Loughran wrote: > Thomas Koch wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >>> One thing I've discussed before is the whole notion of having some >>> hadoop-redist project whose aim is to produce useful >>> packaging/installation of the artifacts of the main Hadoop projects. >> you may be interested in project-builder.org. It's a tool to integrate >> the building of distribution packages in a continuous integration >> workflow. There has been a presentation at the European Free Software >> conference FOSDEM: >> >> Continuous Packaging with Project-Builder.org >> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2010/fosdem10/ >> >> Best regards, >> >> Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro > > thanks, I'll look at it. I do have the CI tools creating RPMs right now, > scp-ing to VMs, though the fact that the rpm tools (especially rpm -qf > to verify that a file exists/is managed) doesn't return error/success > codes, so I have to grab the ssh output and scan for error strings, > which we all think is wrong. From general-return-1105-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 17:57:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61255 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 17:57:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 17:57:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 65630 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:57:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65447 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 17:57:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65426 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 17:57:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:57:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:57:35 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so5329056pwi.35 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:57:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.4.8 with SMTP id g8mr752650rvi.182.1267120635088; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:57:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7488e7731002242239u10b7d870r17983d03efed647e@mail.gmail.com> References: <7488e7731002242239u10b7d870r17983d03efed647e@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:56:54 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71002250956l102e5396gef52f6e175d0f359@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Metadata, Daemons, Benchmarks, Web UI To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd0eba257914304807083c1 --000e0cd0eba257914304807083c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Susheel Varma wrote: > Hi, > > We are trying evaluate a small set of distributed data management > solutions(iRODS, HDFS, Lustre) for our project. We don't really have a > need for scalable computation, but rather our focus is more on > redundancy, reliability and security. Although small bits computation > would be needed at some level. We have just begun an evaluation of > HDFS, however this has thrown up a few questions(a good thing, I > guess): > > 1. Metadata & Links > a. Is there a way to add/update/remove metadata held on the NameNode? > Examples? > b. Is there a way to get hold of the metadata held on the NameNode? > I'd like to allow users to search the HDFS using the the metadata, and > then resolve the query to actual link to the file. > > If a or b is not possible, I would have to resort to using an HBase to store the custom metadata. Examples? > Can you please explain what you mean by metadata? Do you mean arbitrary attributes on files? (like extended attributes in linux?) > > 2. Daemons > a. Is there a way to setup a daemon job(map-reduce, or otherwise) to > listen for filesystem events and trigger actions that need to be > performed on these files? Examples? > b. If not, Is there an FSEvent API I could use? Examples? > Nope. I think someone may have opened a JIRA for an inotify-like API, but this does not exist currently. Polling is the best bet. Alternatively, you could run a daemon on the same host as the NN which tails the audit log (or write a log4j appender for the audit log) to watch for events on the trigger files. This would be a nice contribution. > > 3. Benchmarks > a. Are there any un/published HDFS filesystem benchmarks using IOZone, > PostMark etc. I know almost all FS benchmarks must be taken with a > pinch of salt, but I'd really like to see the quantitative comparisons > with Lustre for example. > > I don't think so - most of the existing benchmark tools require a POSIX filesystem (eg they test random write). There was a thread some time back about running iozone (minus the random write benchmarks) on HDFS, but I'm not sure what the result was. My hunch is that you will find it is competitive for sequential workloads and less competitive for random workloads. That said, I know Brian Bockelman (pretty active on this list) uses HDFS heavily with a primarily random-read workload on a huge scientific dataset with good results. > 4. Web UI > a. Is there a simple way to augment the NameNode Web UI to allow users > to login, search and download the files on the backend filesystem? > Examples? > The existing NN UI has a "browse the filesystem" link. From there you can navigate to a file and click "Download this file". Search is not provided, as there is no efficient indexing and an O(number of files) walk of the filesystem is prohibitively expensive for large NNs. > b. If not, could you show me examples where users have combined a web > application to serve files store on the HDFS? > > Thanks > Susheel > -Todd --000e0cd0eba257914304807083c1-- From general-return-1106-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 18:02:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65036 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 18:02:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 18:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 81843 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:02:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81702 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:02:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81692 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:02:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:02:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:02:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 64899 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:02:35 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:02:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:02:34 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Patrick Hunt wrote: > Thomas, not sure if this solves all your issues but have you considered > using SVN rather than the release tarball? FWIW, in Avro we've moved away from a single release tarball that includes dependencies. Rather the primary release artifact is a source tarball generated with 'svn export'. In addition we distribute derived artifacts as conveniences, like a documentation tarball, a java jar & pom for upload to maven, a java executable jar for command-line tools, a python egg, a ruby gem, C & C++ pristine tarballs, etc. > If you use the release tag from SVN you are guaranteed to get the > same source as is contained in the release artifact. "Guarantee" is a strong word. You certainly should get the same source, but the source that's voted on, that's checksummed and that's signed is the release artifact, not the SVN tag. It's a bug if this is not the same as the release tag, but not impossible. Doug From general-return-1107-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 18:25:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79973 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 18:25:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 18:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39745 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:25:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39609 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:25:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39597 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:25:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:25:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:24:59 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.249] (wifi-e-135-249.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.249]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o1PINrD3015957; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:23:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B86C039.2090309@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:23:53 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> If you use the release tag from SVN you are guaranteed to get the >> same source as is contained in the release artifact. > > "Guarantee" is a strong word. You certainly should get the same source, > but the source that's voted on, that's checksummed and that's signed is > the release artifact, not the SVN tag. It's a bug if this is not the > same as the release tag, but not impossible. Ah, thanks for clarify that Doug. To take it a bit further, when you say "bug" you really mean "serious breach of Apache process/rules", would that be valid? i.e. it would be something that the responsible Apache team should work to address with highest of priority. Patrick ps. I do like this Avro idea of a separate src artifact (re the signing esp). From general-return-1108-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 18:43:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95725 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 18:43:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 18:43:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 68284 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68219 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68211 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:43:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:43:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 95457 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:42:58 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: <4B86C4B1.9050206@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:42:57 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> <4B86C039.2090309@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86C039.2090309@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Patrick Hunt wrote: > Ah, thanks for clarify that Doug. To take it a bit further, when you say > "bug" you really mean "serious breach of Apache process/rules", would > that be valid? i.e. it would be something that the responsible Apache > team should work to address with highest of priority. To some degree that depends on the Apache project. I don't know of a project that does not create release tags and that would accept an incorrect one lightly. That said, release tags are not required nor authoritative: the thing that counts is the signed artifact. I'd certainly encourage developers to leverage tags when convenient e.g., for automated testing against and comparison with prior releases, for IDE source browsing, etc. But if someone wants to package an alternate distribution of an Apache release, I think they're better starting from the release artifact than the tag. The artifact can be validated against the signature at http://www.apache.org/dist/, while there's currently no good means of validating the contents of a tag. I suppose one could rebuild the tarball from the tag and try to validate its checksum against that at http://www.apache.org/dist/, but that seems both fragile and less secure. Doug From general-return-1109-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 25 18:45:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96736 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 18:45:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 18:45:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70417 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:45:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70385 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 18:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70371 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 18:45:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:46 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.249] (wifi-e-135-249.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.249]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o1PIj5nQ021810; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:45:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B86C52E.8090808@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:45:02 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: additional source only release tarball References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> <4B86C039.2090309@apache.org> <4B86C4B1.9050206@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86C4B1.9050206@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok, that's good to know. Thanks. Patrick Doug Cutting wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Ah, thanks for clarify that Doug. To take it a bit further, when you >> say "bug" you really mean "serious breach of Apache process/rules", >> would that be valid? i.e. it would be something that the responsible >> Apache team should work to address with highest of priority. > > To some degree that depends on the Apache project. I don't know of a > project that does not create release tags and that would accept an > incorrect one lightly. That said, release tags are not required nor > authoritative: the thing that counts is the signed artifact. > > I'd certainly encourage developers to leverage tags when convenient > e.g., for automated testing against and comparison with prior releases, > for IDE source browsing, etc. But if someone wants to package an > alternate distribution of an Apache release, I think they're better > starting from the release artifact than the tag. The artifact can be > validated against the signature at http://www.apache.org/dist/, while > there's currently no good means of validating the contents of a tag. I > suppose one could rebuild the tarball from the tag and try to validate > its checksum against that at http://www.apache.org/dist/, but that seems > both fragile and less secure. > > Doug From general-return-1110-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 26 06:28:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1413 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2010 06:28:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2010 06:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 98226 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 06:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98173 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 06:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98165 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2010 06:28:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:28:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of dkumar@qasource.com) Received: from [161.58.59.72] (HELO qasource.com) (161.58.59.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:28:07 +0000 Received: from [192.16.17.127] ([203.193.132.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by qasource.com (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o1Q6Rio1024283 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:27:46 GMT Message-ID: <4B876A2E.7080903@qasource.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:59:02 +0530 From: Devender User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Automation/Performance Testing on Hadoop References: <201002240953.02613.thomas@koch.ro> <4B867929.2030702@apache.org> <201002251610.11798.thomas@koch.ro> <4B86A7B5.9000301@apache.org> <4B86B3F5.60504@apache.org> <4B86BB3A.9080103@apache.org> <4B86C039.2090309@apache.org> <4B86C4B1.9050206@apache.org> <4B86C52E.8090808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B86C52E.8090808@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000605000104000404060103" --------------000605000104000404060103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I had few questions on Hadoop, 1. Is there any way to extract data from Hadoop (data will be in XML) and building customer usage models? 2. Creating tests using those models to drive HTTP, SMTP, etc. 3. Automating the running of those tests on a variety of test matrices at varying load levels to determine system maxima while monitoring system resource parameters to identify bottlenecks. 4. producing graphs/charts based on Excel, perl, web GUI, etc. 5. Which performance tools can be used for this? 6. Which Automation tools can be used for this? Kindly provide your feedback if any one have any information? Regards, Dev --------------000605000104000404060103-- From general-return-1111-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 26 09:29:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74459 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2010 09:29:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2010 09:29:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 97403 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 09:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97372 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 09:29:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97363 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2010 09:29:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:29:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:29:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 74277 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2010 09:28:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:28:57 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5334436bwz.29 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:28:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.202 with SMTP id u10mr93930bkd.65.1267176535666; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:28:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1002231427i5f1d54c4n3f3fad20f19e6cf2@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1002190107y65801a7iab7c5c33cad2daf@mail.gmail.com> <7c962aed1002191108n76516c82q106e7d3e5aeb9428@mail.gmail.com> <4aa34eb71002222352l394b9002jd3fd95b4ef0c06c6@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231050r53cc0c9bk57d61be742ba98@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002231332oe60997egdf2626c3b6536573@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71002231412i51d3c79fre9c67436b721dcf1@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b1002231427i5f1d54c4n3f3fad20f19e6cf2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:28:55 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1002260128h642c36a3p7779f4749c779f4c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With 4 +1s, the vote passes. I'll push out the release. -C On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > The rules are here: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > This says that one cannot veto a release, but 3 days should be > sufficient for everyone to test it out and find problems. If nobody > finds anything sufficient to block the release, I'll try to push it on > Wednesday or Thursday. -C > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> I believe the process is that there need to be 3 "+1" votes from PMC >> members. I'm not sure if the one who rolled the release counts as one >> of the binding +1 votes. If so, we should have the requisite number, >> and we just need to wait a few days to be sure there are no -1s before >> closing the vote. If not, we need one more PMC +1. >> >> So, to answer your question, I would guess < 1 week. >> >> Thanks >> -Todd >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Watt wrote: >>> Bit of noob question here, but I haven't been around long enough to hav= e >>> observed the full lifecycle of a point release candidate yet. Given the >>> generally positive feedback about 20.2 rc4, how close are we to actuall= y >>> releasing it? Is it 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks ? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Steve Watt >>> >>> >>> >>> From: >>> Chris Douglas >>> To: >>> general@hadoop.apache.org >>> Date: >>> 02/23/2010 03:34 PM >>> Subject: >>> Re: [VOTE] Should we release 0.20.2-rc4 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> I looked around, and found this repository of public keys: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS >>> >>> I'd be happy to upload my key elsewhere if necessary; I found no >>> documentation on that point. >>> >>> We'll inevitably roll a 0.20.3, which I agree, should include >>> MAPREDUCE-587 -C >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote= : >>>> Tested download with md5: 8f40198ed18bef28aeea1401ec536cb9 >>>> Tried to verify the GPG signature, but Chris is not in >>>> http://download.nextag.com/apache/hadoop/core/KEYS - he should be >>>> added there if he is going to sign releases. >>>> >>>> I ran unit tests on my machine at home - TestStreamingExitStatus >>>> failed with an OOME. I think it's exactly MAPREDUCE-587. Aside from >>>> that, all unit tests passed. I also ran a few jobs on a >>>> pseudo-distributed cluster and it worked fine. >>>> >>>> Since this is just a test bug, and in contrib, I think we should >>>> release anyway. Meanwhile let's commit MAPREDUCE-587 to branch-20 >>>> before the next release. I'll reopen that JIRA. >>>> >>>> So, [non-binding] +1 from me. Thanks for the hard work, Chris. >>>> >>>> -Todd >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Dhruba Borthakur >>> wrote: >>>>> +1. Looks good to me. Ran unit tests. >>>>> >>>>> -dhruba >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stack wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I put up on a small cluster under load. =A0Seems to work fine. =A0Tr= olled >>>>>> logs a while. =A0Nothing out of the ordinary. =A0Checked docs. =A0Th= ey look >>>>>> grand. >>>>>> >>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Chris Douglas >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > There are now only two consistently failing testcases in my >>>>>> > environment, both in the capacity-scheduler contrib module: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestJobInitialization >>>>>> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestQueueCapacities >>>>>> > >>>>>> > neither of which is a regression from 0.20.1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cdouglas/0.20.2-rc4 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please try it out. -C >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > From general-return-1112-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 26 18:10:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95833 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2010 18:10:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2010 18:10:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 50786 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 18:10:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50744 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 18:10:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50686 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2010 18:10:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:10:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.86] (HELO n2d.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.86) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:10:43 +0000 Received: from [74.6.228.94] by n2.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Feb 2010 18:10:22 -0000 Received: from [76.13.10.167] by t1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Feb 2010 18:10:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp108.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Feb 2010 18:10:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 180180.13144.bm@omp108.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 11373 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Feb 2010 18:10:22 -0000 Message-ID: <850621.10792.qm@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: _5jUdv4VM1k9KTf.Y4Al.DS4hnr.CmVrkJrVgkjkhISduUbdP2XxTAhuYCy3kwIVjGRHWbox.xkzbGqufadynFtmKS6LFRFrnQKX_8EtaxiTm7zjyze27N2x2nI73XKUblwrUKgptdtBYB7ukoCFWm3TC7DhTphUIWSTP.C39o6E5bDr65plBmQmXvfPXRj9XteC2Fq595yYnSfJfV8SQqAzApKxNdD.FMwn0zLufLAYDty0HTY0Uq.KbritbobZGlS7fVm9uwkBr7mflIY8AlSPSK3Xh6gRRya5ShCbNFCRzRjDublfSTpuqnbeSC97zRNJQd02jL9gkJBjqhk- Received: from [69.111.188.126] by web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:10:21 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/300.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:10:21 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Subject: HUG9 @ Mozilla March 10th, register at http://su.pr/4pe8Of To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To any interested parties, The 9th edition of the HBase Users' Group is kindly being sponsored and hosted by Mozilla in Mountain View (California) on March 10th. Register at http://su.pr/4pe8Of Yours, The HBaseistas From general-return-1113-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 26 21:56:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77485 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30931 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 21:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30629 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2010 21:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30590 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2010 21:56:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:56:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zshao9@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.193] (HELO mail-iw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.223.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:56:33 +0000 Received: by iwn31 with SMTP id 31so625881iwn.30 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=XzENaykAvSgdyhPPKrB0B5lZ7moQDAfCK6+ZcR0bWOU=; b=Xg9SKxAF1jCNxuWw0OB5FLkzMyeYXZC30xKszulqLn+lAJYUUuIlU+d0lRc5kw5wL3 IQPnPj4MU1z6sUF+0f2RvLN0r8cfx5+R+jR7w2/n7pCA8bctaORhvoGJpcqlIob//885 zu7wtY9SELKCGl0WkiTleOkm4akCWxC1IgmX8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=c9j9Ne/FbP0uBYZ1NNDScm6NOwY2HYhssa/ojGXi/dB/l34kg+AAu59ajVx9MD09F0 jUbTh4GP4F+XPa5gjpilXgNy0Y/GOi37rtKFsotWJBygOcHcvwRA7Rqkxb1nguxKiHQF zVnq8cUEBnpTwh8ks3XUTMczEslQGxUwm3J6A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr764859ibx.41.1267221372918; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:12 -0800 Message-ID: <34fd060d1002261356u1f37e824x8f879d20ba1ebdb6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hive User Group Meeting 3/18/2010 7pm at Facebook From: Zheng Shao To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, We are going to hold the second Hive User Group Meeting at 7PM on 3/18/2010 Thursday. The agenda will be: * Hive Tutorial: 20 min * Hive User Case Study: 20 min * New Features and API: 25 min JDBC/ODBC and CTAS UDF/UDAF/UDTF Create View/HBaseInputFormat Hive Join Strategy SerDe The audience is beginner to intermediate Hive users/developers. *** The details are here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=319237846974 *** *** Please RSVP so we can schedule logistics accordingly. *** -- Yours, Zheng From general-return-240-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 01:31:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17910 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 01:31:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 01:31:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 61590 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 01:31:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61364 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 01:31:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61221 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 01:31:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:31:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.149] (HELO rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:31:42 +0000 Received: from [10.73.153.22] (snvvpn1-10-73-153-c22.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.153.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp1.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n591VDuX086034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2DBB61.5010707@apache.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:31:13 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Show your ZooKeeper pride! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hadoop summit is Wednesday. If you're attending please feel free to say hi -- Mahadev is presenting @4, Ben and I will be attending as well. Also, regardless of whether you're attending or not we'd appreciate any updates to the "powered by" page, if you're too busy to update it yourself send us a snippet and we'll update it for you ;-) http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PoweredBy Regards, Patrick From general-return-241-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 02:07:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35326 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 02:07:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 02:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 94064 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 02:07:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93949 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 02:07:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93921 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 02:07:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:07:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nitayj@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.29] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:07:09 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1945095ywe.29 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qywph0KMWmf25LAIBnw8yXHQRRXeemxTut1yB05vUF0=; b=kFkX8bizh4GLmPwm9hHjFZJE94ACPfI/C3WLSDY6sp8i93O2rcJl2/n4b17w3onGQx 8vzG7V1Rnk/L2Nb3cccBNxO78K2MhCgmsKECZXiV91lcvEJyKJvK0C9nUGo6cGjATbw7 9e9e+93xqepOBpToBmJrSRLbk+jKL/+THRR5U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mkdOgPgNhkqsq7irAo4gTPRpmLrXBLCU6xCYZbBURqXRUc6GvSsdugSKLiFtIcOK8i 4NhSExjGuL/CD7eugLOCWrpLqnyKyhvOkCzFWxyDtYqSGW67NMz7Llq5zOPWv6EoNvBv UsnLWyoMb7xpWEDjlJs1NZBPCkWqOsBErCH64= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.144.13 with SMTP id w13mr13812089ybn.281.1244513208395; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4A2DBB61.5010707@apache.org> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:06:48 -0700 Message-ID: <82b0992a0906081906p67cb7877pc1f6212dc0d87c6f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Show your ZooKeeper pride! From: Nitay To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750dcacb467ef046be0cf91 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151750dcacb467ef046be0cf91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Added HBase. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > How come Yahoo isn't listed? > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > The Hadoop summit is Wednesday. If you're attending please feel free to > say > > hi -- Mahadev is presenting @4, Ben and I will be attending as well. > > > > Also, regardless of whether you're attending or not we'd appreciate any > > updates to the "powered by" page, if you're too busy to update it > yourself > > send us a snippet and we'll update it for you ;-) > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PoweredBy > > > > Regards, > > > > Patrick > > > > > > -- > Ted Dunning, CTO > DeepDyve > > 111 West Evelyn Ave. Ste. 202 > Sunnyvale, CA 94086 > http://www.deepdyve.com > 858-414-0013 (m) > 408-773-0220 (fax) > --00151750dcacb467ef046be0cf91-- From general-return-242-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 03:34:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58687 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 03:34:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 03:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 46948 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 03:34:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46847 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 03:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90034 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 02:01:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.28 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=NaVsAlPDjnfhwh7UoFF2WsR9+BahoZDccuz6iZ1N/oI=; b=DjTGdQ2goYfTSVfHhqqdWaF3x0HtOMCGG09Fmrte03fbExMaH6TXG5ydxdMzZUnfw9 EbJB3D46/4ioEwO/i0HZS7ZoobDC6grw8ERmDJBqkOsBr+dbRXwEpE3PkezysEwD3nhL kZffx07tEBar2oUTUW+uEfa752f9gXbpL/+PA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=USh+C5bXq3iK9dv2PfWjFls5qOoFkCUqC9pFQBCyNmo9iXiXZ28Jm8JBS4OMY3VqQJ Yyeu+2mHHv/HL7kmftba8TqTULM2PEAVQk49Va0UNS2hCAP7LW+BiL4SKSPxm2YLlfLf Kp1WLbZwS7L4UH8aNOeCwr3B2E/tdXDfWI/ds= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A2DBB61.5010707@apache.org> References: <4A2DBB61.5010707@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:01:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Show your ZooKeeper pride! To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517573df28e3c04046be0bc43 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517573df28e3c04046be0bc43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How come Yahoo isn't listed? On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The Hadoop summit is Wednesday. If you're attending please feel free to say > hi -- Mahadev is presenting @4, Ben and I will be attending as well. > > Also, regardless of whether you're attending or not we'd appreciate any > updates to the "powered by" page, if you're too busy to update it yourself > send us a snippet and we'll update it for you ;-) > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PoweredBy > > Regards, > > Patrick > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve 111 West Evelyn Ave. Ste. 202 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 http://www.deepdyve.com 858-414-0013 (m) 408-773-0220 (fax) --001517573df28e3c04046be0bc43-- From general-return-243-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 03:34:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58805 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 03:34:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 03:34:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 47893 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 03:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47823 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 03:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96086 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 02:10:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=k8C0RhxEJ0ksin6H1lRe523p9GKRLRt6uw4u0gjvIt99d7or/xh6zmwluJ9RwBsP User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302 Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:09:28 -0700 Subject: Re: Show your ZooKeeper pride! From: Mahadev Konar To: , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Show your ZooKeeper pride! Thread-Index: Acnop1Fs7VYAde60k0+RtUgGtkXLIg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2009 02:09:29.0536 (UTC) FILETIME=[52569C00:01C9E8A7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Its just that Zookeeper mostly is used in applications which are proprietary (to Yahoo!) and so its harder to update the wiki with specifics on how it is being used. thanks mahadev On 6/8/09 7:01 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > How come Yahoo isn't listed? > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> The Hadoop summit is Wednesday. If you're attending please feel free to say >> hi -- Mahadev is presenting @4, Ben and I will be attending as well. >> >> Also, regardless of whether you're attending or not we'd appreciate any >> updates to the "powered by" page, if you're too busy to update it yourself >> send us a snippet and we'll update it for you ;-) >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PoweredBy >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >> > > From general-return-244-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 06:54:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62249 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 06:54:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 06:54:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 66230 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 06:54:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66154 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 06:54:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66144 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 06:54:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:54:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of miryalavignesh@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.189] (HELO mail-px0-f189.google.com) (209.85.216.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:54:14 +0000 Received: by pxi27 with SMTP id 27so351484pxi.5 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4J7YxtI5KePpRG9TBs5iI5XMPa4D7H+LXtXpT5HOo/Y=; b=DsIJW4+Voe/KWOKlDd80gqqzXggQCdu8syiSj5NjJHFBeoiQo8wluVcBfNEBS8ClpI lWS0jhTvc7ey+UHtfGfU4N5JmIWVQO6kAt2jwBFzO8l6M43hDEJpdrQ4dmwTnUf0a0dJ bQRi+AVKfMwQZk7Z0iihajbIcdw05LRHsbLxE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ECSKQoDMxgPO8RvpciarV06hxZAxI/Aaciv2VeU0O97y0OxzgpmHIwLwarCvRK6jI1 G+V5QZeBzPt0HJ1Nw7qSjrNesxNwyptMnp42teq3jUEj+gTKWYc+FH4ne6pEylcOeD8B 3ipmIX2RxPgU/1nJ4ixhWiKmqpjQfRsFB3sWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.214.12 with SMTP id m12mr2883643wfg.119.1244530434045; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:53:54 -0700 (PDT) From: miryala vignesh Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:23:34 +0530 Message-ID: <46a7d8de0906082353g24338861i68e6ad053c7df6a4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Implementing join on hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Did any one work on any project related to databases (simple things like join) on hadoop ? Can any one tell me where can I find hbase programming tutorials (expecting something other than official website )? I am not sure if this is the right place for this message , please direct me to the apt mailing list or forum if this isn't the place . From general-return-245-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 09 16:08:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96153 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 16:08:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 16:08:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 47927 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 16:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47852 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 16:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24550 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 07:37:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu designates 169.229.60.87 as permitted sender) Message-Id: From: Matei Zaharia To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <46a7d8de0906082353g24338861i68e6ad053c7df6a4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Implementing join on hadoop Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:36:23 -0700 References: <46a7d8de0906082353g24338861i68e6ad053c7df6a4@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Miryala, In general you should use core-user@hadoop.apache.org (subscribe here: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/mailing_lists.html) for questions about using Hadoop. Anyway, joins and other SQL operators are implemented by both the Hive and Pig Hadoop sub-projects (linked at the top of http://hadoop.apache.org/) and by the DataJoin library in Hadoop. Hive is the closest thing to a relational database on Hadoop, supporting table schemas, a centralized metadata repository, and a SQL-like query language. Pig is a high-level language for writing Hadoop workflows that includes SQL operators. Matei On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:53 PM, miryala vignesh wrote: > Did any one work on any project related to databases (simple things > like join) on hadoop ? > Can any one tell me where can I find hbase programming tutorials > (expecting something other than official website )? > > I am not sure if this is the right place for this message , please > direct me to the apt mailing list or forum if this isn't the place . From general-return-246-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:12:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41055 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:12:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 78369 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78323 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78311 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:12:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:12:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.65.144.75] (HELO p02c11o142.mxlogic.net) (208.65.144.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:12:11 +0000 Received: from unknown [63.251.237.3] (EHLO mtiexch01.mti.com) by p02c11o142.mxlogic.net (mxl_mta-6.2.0-4) with ESMTP id 5e1393a4.2586471312.636695.00-006.p02c11o142.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:11:51 -0600 (MDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:11:49 -0700 Message-ID: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01DDF27B@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Thread-Index: AcnNxepSpOFHRec4RX+Djty21JFqUgGP/ssQAVhVC7AFg+0HkA== References: From: "Satish Kikkeri" To: Cc: X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2009052001)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [63.251.237.3] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=4iyT6hJci8cA:10 a=xupnbh4h0YLOHZnncC45HQ==:17 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=CbDCq_QkAAAA:8 a=AnZFoEh2AAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=CjxXg] X-AnalysisOut: [O3LAAAA:8 a=htzNLyBbAAAA:8 a=X7BGoOqpqRD5uP4gtdMA:9 a=9h-b] X-AnalysisOut: [tLetWG7E2Ap4n5gYeDKE_ngA:4 a=6bbpDATN3xAA:10 a=gQ22TatrZ4o] X-AnalysisOut: [A:10 a=mqKVMgZcPAkA:10 a=-NOWlJdPJ3YA:10] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is the next Hadoop UG meeting today (6/18) or next week (6/25) Thanks=20 ________________________________________________________________________ _______________ =20 Satish Kikkeri Mellanox Technologies 350 Oakmead Parkway, Sunnyvale, CA 94085 408-916-0045 (Direct) 408-807-9903 (Mobile) www.mellanox.com =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Ajay Anand [mailto:aanand@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:28 AM To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org; zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Reminder: the Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is today at 6 pm at the Yahoo! Sunnyvale campus - http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2659418/ =20 ________________________________ From: Ajay Anand=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:12 PM To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'pig-user@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th =20 The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 20th at Yahoo! 700 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, Building E, Class room 10 from 6:00-7:30 pm. Please note that the location has changed from our usual meeting place in Santa Clara.=20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/2659418/ =20 Agenda: - Hadoop Summit 2009 preview (registration open at http://hadoopsummit09.eventbrite.com/ ) - Hadoop with GPFS - Prasenjit Sarkar, IBM - SQoop - Cloudera Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 =20 From general-return-247-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:29:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68939 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:29:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 20324 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20258 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20233 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:29:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:29:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:29:12 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.112.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5HISCVN024240 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=Br4V39n5sT7nRoTIEJfknEsTCrnYECCsnNf++J2Da7R+6QKJj8sim1jKpDHTDZ2L Message-Id: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:28:12 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just the common libraries. -- Owen From general-return-248-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:31:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71158 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:31:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22629 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:31:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22566 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22556 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:31:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:31:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:31:31 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so681906bwz.29 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.1 with SMTP id u1mr425881bkp.37.1245263470527; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:30:50 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100906171130k77c8726el710686e1eb968b4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d64515d068b4046c8f7e70 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d64515d068b4046c8f7e70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better reflect > the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just the > common libraries. > > -- Owen > --0016e6d64515d068b4046c8f7e70-- From general-return-249-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:34:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73160 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:34:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 28438 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:34:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28372 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28362 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:34:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:34:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:34:09 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so684008bwz.29 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:33:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.60.194 with SMTP id q2mr393501bkh.150.1245263627758; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:33:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100906171130k77c8726el710686e1eb968b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> <15da8a100906171130k77c8726el710686e1eb968b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:33:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better reflect >> the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just the >> common libraries. >> >> -- Owen >> > From general-return-250-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:35:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73814 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:35:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:35:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 34338 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:35:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34284 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:35:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34259 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:35:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:35:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:35:27 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5HIYeoN055955 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:34:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=nEjLWIWr+kPvMMP19W4gps4vvu8oV5IL6ZjggfM3PbLARRfblxFglINIgASIDY2f Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:34:39 -0700 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Arun On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but > rather just the common libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-251-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:39:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76856 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:39:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:39:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 48159 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:40:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48106 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48096 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:40:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:39:59 +0000 Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 51sD1c0020ldTLk586fffV; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:39:39 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 56fT1c0052SbwD53Q6fWlh; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:39:36 +0000 Cc: Dekel Tankel Message-Id: <94E98768-027B-464D-A738-5B74069D9291@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01DDF27B@mtiexch01.mti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) May 20th Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:39:25 -0700 References: <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F01DDF27B@mtiexch01.mti.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Satish Kikkeri wrote: > Is the next Hadoop UG meeting today (6/18) or next week (6/25) We just had the Hadoop Summit last week, so let's skip this month. I expect that the Hadoop User Group meetings will resume next month. -- Owen From general-return-252-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 18:52:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87097 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 18:52:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 18:52:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 81403 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81343 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 18:52:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81333 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 18:52:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:52:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.252.110.217] (HELO web56208.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (216.252.110.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:52:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 81546 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jun 2009 18:52:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1245264735; bh=uEB+24h54con6PGYLRD9tQ37RfcNAzH41b6LuIPYlhQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KefAyHw6YRczsn2KW70vY5bAJLLo+5uBr8TULJwYQyX+tWpLqsXsq4hgauDoOVf4B9Pp+cJPgNR+bDZVL8h0N3aqKpumMYbNBx8RuIj+T7WkNHTINeMK8bC1Jukf8WIIqwZFo22o5WREFrJR4JCLQrgrgfgp2ocE6CKPrWXsRvo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Qs2+fHblQPZcO9lRDvuoepawHGcB6DPldZ48BhrFXeYQSvrqizOW6ELvdAlxNhJ5ZwspcsCLZctHAfqNqfXPKJ+ZW4l91XvAsSbCL7rhJkjLYtl1ea1zmG4Fkyp87HJsdOnSvbfA2CSwkRgDubr47qGZYAUEaM9/FFtYCtQ5qGg=; Message-ID: <183794.81398.qm@web56208.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: X.wJaLEVM1mfeGEd1jn2oOXJ_jSoeZfD78zyW13zKvejEMk9CHw380Xe5LxBbwnBUkBvm1OecPMwmt48eI0r5Kaoc45J5QFqjhN06Is26IfEBw9pH_MrfmC.8mzpYOHXFqdRoRHI3GuVWijGy72Pb4noB3zJJTEDYidalVOGmz_EXhfGOmTVN96IymfR3XADXcQ2VbTQWGy.OC_6W2u6qiRRb2rO9z8Mug3oWTLJvU2.TkMmDhniXxXyQmXqcRgoclDZSFENRmJ.6v6Ch1HG2RncWXSRMTCDzNrk2HPnR5AM4zIgEjCLaC.SLIFcdM7L4QoEH5LxlXw- Received: from [216.145.49.5] by web56208.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:52:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.43 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Nicholas Sze ----- Original Message ---- > From: Owen O'Malley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:28:12 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common > > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better reflect the > fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just the common > libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-253-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 19:20:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9466 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 19:20:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 19:20:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 30792 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 19:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30699 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 19:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30689 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 19:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cutting@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.173] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:20:19 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so217232wfg.2 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q5frm1c99ZHP8HDe9IgaOmwbw/5AlMMq1sHYnl2EDLk=; b=CYzYlwNO3XQ1h0iVXSzj6hoBWeT91ZUc59vvi1orIz5fGxgtN5Kegx25oj8K0KKKFI FB0aMckGr+8+xSnnrwdRHcl0QB677v/OzGurdV1bbYbQgwS7Z2tC8zM2ugxhY17Ok6NP 6SfXN5MmetHBr8SDySeX6HQ2DWl0L0ngrcz+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EO2kJICEnxPdEcsdR89VjGuJNBZQ5qA7+NTmaIA1L+XwKH6GxGCv8IXoAuE/OUO5+V 3kLrFTmn5yzcPSipqyUisLjBPYHxUCsPdqnh/+mEv6kOPu/qOCOfloBzd5ovtKvrgPHa VbDcBfaRyIHLB7ZDdr6z5fFhu+sD731cYswgs= Received: by 10.142.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr502921wfe.262.1245266398133; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.168.16? (c-76-103-176-123.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.176.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm460579wfg.10.2009.06.17.12.19.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug Cutting Message-ID: <4A3941DB.30707@apache.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:55 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather > just the common libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-254-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 20:08:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41604 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 20:08:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 20:08:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 58685 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:08:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58622 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58612 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 20:08:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:08:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:08:30 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5HK7ekr065696 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:07:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=RmB8jXe8euWJDl9kBmeBiXopCNKzmp5lQmrVrQVlnrf4Rn7xRK2BGtFfLjmRSz0N Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:07:40 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:07:39 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:07:39 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common From: Mahadev Konar To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Thread-Index: Acnvh0OR64puutHZgU+XAV2PwkU8JA== In-Reply-To: <4A3941DB.30707@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2009 20:07:40.0400 (UTC) FILETIME=[44671700:01C9EF87] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 mahadev On 6/17/09 12:19 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > +1 > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better >> reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather >> just the common libraries. >> >> -- Owen From general-return-255-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 20:10:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42147 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 20:10:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 20:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 61342 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61285 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61264 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 20:11:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:11:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu designates 169.229.60.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [169.229.60.87] (HELO gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.60.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:10:54 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-76-21-11-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.11.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.3/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n5HKAUq9028875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Matei Zaharia To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common X-Priority: 5 (Lowest) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:10:30 -0700 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Matei On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but > rather just the common libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-256-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 20:13:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43898 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 20:13:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 20:13:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 66936 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:13:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66874 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 20:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66864 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 20:13:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:13:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:13:46 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-246-34.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-34.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.34]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5HKCRY5067628 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:12:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Y19bt/4XHtrIT2CKyV8W2d4n2Cc9hgGHN803hd1l2p7BzL7H6Yoy4UrdhF9oK2DJ Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:12:27 -0700 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but > rather just the common libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-257-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 21:04:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65614 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 21:04:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 21:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60499 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 21:04:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60438 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 21:04:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60428 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 21:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.200] (HELO mail-pz0-f200.google.com) (209.85.222.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:04:12 +0000 Received: by pzk38 with SMTP id 38so571937pzk.5 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr788452wad.182.1245272631434; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.42.100? (75-101-123-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.123.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm1910547waa.47.2009.06.17.14.03.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A395A13.9030809@cloudera.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:03:15 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah Organization: Cloudera, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> <15da8a100906171130k77c8726el710686e1eb968b4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 From general-return-258-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 22:09:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9734 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 22:09:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 22:09:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87794 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 22:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87725 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 22:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87715 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 22:09:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com designates 131.107.115.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [131.107.115.214] (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) (131.107.115.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:09:20 +0000 Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.180) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:08:58 -0700 Received: from TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.91.69]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:23:21 -0700 From: "Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Thread-Index: AQHJ75G77t8RWR/NNU23Lq1uQDj/9JBLRIMA Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:23:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:oom@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:28 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common > > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather > just the common libraries. > > -- Owen From general-return-259-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 17 22:31:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27644 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 22:31:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 22:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 32083 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 22:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31967 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 22:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31947 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 22:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com designates 167.1.158.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [167.1.158.29] (HELO cvgmx2.convergys.com) (167.1.158.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:31:10 +0000 Received: from CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com (CDC5NW41.na.convergys.com [155.90.28.181]) by cvgmx2.convergys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06991152E5E2 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Anubhav Hanjura is out of the office. From: anubhav.hanjura@convergys.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:00:16 +0530 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CVGSMTP1/SRVR/CVG(Release 6.5.5FP3|March 22, 2007) at 06/17/2009 06:31:14 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I will be out of the office starting 06/15/2009 and will not return until 06/29/2009. Please contact Nishi Kant for general operability issues, Dileep for 5632 related questions, Shashank/Tarun/Kishore for OLC Lab related issues. -- "NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by telephone (collect), so that the sender's address records can be corrected." From general-return-260-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 18 00:32:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74099 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 00:32:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 00:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 63985 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 00:32:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63924 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 00:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63914 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2009 00:32:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:32:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.30] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:32:27 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so323819ywe.29 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PTL85vE1ULKA8WPw8TGm2+RwmPXD3D1Xz1OdA/odmWM=; b=Gk5O9ykmzHd9qd0WIsq47cMuk7yoj9tUbNp73LT4AeCjCabAaRKlio2ktyRNMC6uET DBQ5C69YCQanXRwMLEp5YY/QQkA0HG5KPHXDSw+mo1CRUGTkNyDLiP+V7bybGQ/ygLYQ ZiDENN8kqosvD0Vgfs+VNZAPNu4wazrHGvUIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YcEU8O20Q8CYF3UL0zJsutt3JDBC6qPgdE46/gpz1xZIdSp2QPoLl4dYg9LnbqyGJR f7jvrHaATYGarT/Tp9/c1kZ06Kl6tLIflJBGvBdRCe8bEbiUcVPolrblczF23NiPu0Aw 0MA3btCB13avAoA4pIl4wbBsIhc8DjAjz+SR0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.50.13 with SMTP id c13mr2325056ybk.79.1245284752447; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:25:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:25:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70906171725y3ece018dm5b003800ecd03f36@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151750eed0505a2b046c947301 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151750eed0505a2b046c947301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) < Jim.Kellerman@microsoft.com> wrote: > +1 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:oom@yahoo-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:28 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common > > > > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather > > just the common libraries. > > > > -- Owen > > --00151750eed0505a2b046c947301-- From general-return-261-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 18 01:11:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88107 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 01:11:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 01:11:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 96299 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 01:11:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96242 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 01:11:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96232 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2009 01:11:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:11:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:11:43 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5I1AMdT083888 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=zompbFYfot0LB5plQrMY1HqfVyrlfjkaFk7tmp/moMBU5kTOy97cM3zq62j+jCue Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:10:22 -0700 From: Devaraj Das To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:10:19 -0700 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Thread-Index: AcnveZ8IvE1E+64WQ3uw/tn6W1H9wgAN+y8I Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C65F91D35EB9Dddasyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C65F91D35EB9Dddasyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 On 6/17/09 11:58 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just the common libraries. -- Owen --_000_C65F91D35EB9Dddasyahooinccom_-- From general-return-262-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 18 19:33:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85759 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 19:33:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 19:33:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 69635 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 19:33:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69398 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 19:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69332 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2009 19:33:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:33:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:33:03 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n5IJVHqd046002; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:31:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=UOOfeLnB7t4XUgHFnpMqMsGfeJvDEwFQnFVkEdoBCu6yUZ12UCM91Zb5fmHi3gv7 Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:31:16 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9F04B.376C558E" Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:19 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Thread-Index: AcnwSzdeHvsmuCnUSiKzZJzKb8waJw== From: "Olga Natkovich" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2009 19:31:16.0902 (UTC) FILETIME=[59597C60:01C9F04B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9F04B.376C558E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main feature of this release is support for multiquery which allows to share computation across multiple queries within the same script. We see significant performance improvements (up to order of magnitude) as the result of this optimization. =20 I ran the rat report and made sure that all the source files contain proper headers. (Not attaching the report since it caused trouble with the last release.) =20 Keys used to sign the release candidate are at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS. =20 Please, download and try the release candidate: http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.3.0-candidate-0/. =20 Please, vote by Wednesday, June 24th. =20 Olga =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9F04B.376C558E-- From general-return-263-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 16:11:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13512 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 16:11:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 16:11:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92144 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 16:11:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92067 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 16:11:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92057 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 16:11:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.100.122.233] (HELO mgw-mx06.nokia.com) (192.100.122.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:34 +0000 Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n5JGAmY6013323 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:11:05 +0300 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:11:02 +0300 Received: from mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.47]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:11:01 +0300 Received: from [172.19.167.46] (bsdhcp16746.americas.nokia.com [172.19.167.46]) by mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n5JGAxxC019441 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:10:59 +0300 Subject: HDFS name node HA roadmap From: Andrew Wharton Reply-To: andrew.wharton@nokia.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Nokia, Inc. Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:10:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1245427858.5132.2.camel@1USL14830.NOE.Nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2009 16:11:01.0745 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A2BC610:01C9F0F8] X-Nokia-AV: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the expected delivery date of that release? Thanks. -- Andrew From general-return-264-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 16:37:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20459 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 16:37:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 16:37:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 22747 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 16:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22726 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 16:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22716 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 16:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.141 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.141] (HELO e23smtp08.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:24:17 +0000 Received: from d23relay02.au.ibm.com (d23relay02.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.244]) by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5K2KpcC001466 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:20:51 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay02.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5JGNsUq835806 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:23:55 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5JGNse5019533 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:23:54 +1000 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5JGNrhQ019512; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:23:54 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1245427858.5132.2.camel@1USL14830.NOE.Nokia.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Jie Qiu Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:23:59 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 06/20/2009 00:24:00, Serialize complete at 06/20/2009 00:24:00 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005A1343482575DA_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 005A1343482575DA_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Andrew, Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. ================================================== True insight comes from within! Qiu Jie Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery IBM China Research Lab. Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 FAX: 8610-58748330 Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com ================================================== Andrew Wharton 2009-06-20 00:10 Please respond to general@hadoop.apache.org To general@hadoop.apache.org cc Subject HDFS name node HA roadmap Hello, My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the expected delivery date of that release? Thanks. -- Andrew --=_alternative 005A1343482575DA_=-- From general-return-265-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:16:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37285 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:16:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:16:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 11816 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:17:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11761 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:17:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11751 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:17:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:17:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.28] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:16:52 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so854266ywe.29 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:16:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kG0vzUVzNS3dPQnwVtQiQoycJhPcWze0sVuaUBHbn2k=; b=NOF0YY/bmkgl89qRZgBLK6gXzmqbdXwmZeEm7hyHuXwvRv8KewRhc8qVYmYZPq6aRP TtT25HxVcsgGftCTF5UK/XHaTVbN+QDnfqW+Sze1YchCPYE8XR/0gtLqmUsIA0IchyQD MBEWrBNzz3hKKmBXQvtnNGD2cy809YosuoJhc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=S8bcGcUm4Ss/OiFhJH1aVAS3lsoikGFY3wQ6ag2GXU2NwrIJpLEto2RJwoKtgjt0RM 3sBeJG+sO5BgEQkBZDe3Tu3/vYEf1KQV4QnxkQFhLVwEPsJf47lqvKDjywNEKaQa57m9 yL1QtxQ43QDw7+ia2ezOf49GE/oq8vJ0enBnA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.135.11 with SMTP id m11mr6155850ybn.228.1245431791394; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:16:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1245427858.5132.2.camel@1USL14830.NOE.Nokia.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:16:31 -0700 Message-ID: <5f7f740b0906191016m3e1862ebs26e4fc5f5f0635e0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f0938849eee046cb6afd9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f0938849eee046cb6afd9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv > about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. If you want a major change like this to go into the real code base, you need to open a jira, and let people comment on your architecture, design and test plans. If you present it as a huge code drop, it is unlikely to go in. -- Owen --001e680f0938849eee046cb6afd9-- From general-return-266-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:19:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38725 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:19:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15975 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:20:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15911 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:20:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15900 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:20:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:20:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.215] (HELO mail-gx0-f215.google.com) (209.85.217.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:19:57 +0000 Received: by gxk11 with SMTP id 11so2758173gxk.5 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=P1FN1jWZkAbokDGgcFsRW0AP917AwHhQXQGUWGkMV4k=; b=UhRLbd81Fb956q9ff+q7ChzXiVMPe59S9S6R6qY3NcaGNaKGXucWhkQPpy0BiIx/g1 FmnSKIMuO6qF/XNp/gUsjRQ+0pTW9wSp87Okip0LP0AqATofC+3xrMy2fmHRmWJfz68F +Cf6XZw/X0x1sFflc/Lf+y81xONh2TvY0F0Yw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OOqWzdR1KpB8HcCmpTTlv8Z0J7U9vKmiuVHwOBfqHZVULbtWSdzVg78Av+XKoOOOPB NpBpn8XhyZ7PIMpZVNPGlNIZmu+/NCSk+K0N9H6iNAjDZdUMjf7qd5FPfIXDllDHPlRy gadJSMz60p6aDrEGLclfTOFLPjafkg6JSRrPo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.134.2 with SMTP id l2mr6160180ybn.163.1245431975886; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1245427858.5132.2.camel@1USL14830.NOE.Nokia.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:19:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70906191019t31618bf0jd6a7ee1a92f55525@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001b24be338c83c13d046cb6ba3d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001b24be338c83c13d046cb6ba3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hie, If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA and let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a while and it is good to get a an early start on it. thanks, dhruba On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced > soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. > > However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv > about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. > > ================================================== > True insight comes from within! > > Qiu Jie > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > IBM China Research Lab. > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > FAX: 8610-58748330 > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > ================================================== > > > > Andrew Wharton > 2009-06-20 00:10 > Please respond to > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > To > general@hadoop.apache.org > cc > > Subject > HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > Hello, > > My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will > be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the > expected delivery date of that release? > > Thanks. > > -- Andrew > > > --001b24be338c83c13d046cb6ba3d-- From general-return-267-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:29:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48780 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:29:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:29:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 29558 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29480 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29470 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:29:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:29:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.148 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.148] (HELO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:29:17 +0000 Received: from d23relay01.au.ibm.com (d23relay01.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.243]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5JHSkZn014762 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:28:46 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay01.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5JHSrm7536868 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:28:53 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5JHSrGg030260 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:28:53 +1000 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5JHSqP4030257; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:28:52 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4aa34eb70906191019t31618bf0jd6a7ee1a92f55525@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: andrew.wharton@nokia.com, general@hadoop.apache.org, shv@yahoo-inc.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Jie Qiu Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:28:57 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 06/20/2009 01:28:59, Serialize complete at 06/20/2009 01:28:59 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00600623482575DA_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 00600623482575DA_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi, Dhruba, Yes, we plan to open a JIRA to let community to review our implementation and give comments. Recently, we are going with IBM internal process before submitting to the community. I also want to discuss with shv whether we need to another separate JIRA or work on the same integrated JIRA. Do you any suggestion on this? ================================================== True insight comes from within! Qiu Jie Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery IBM China Research Lab. Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 FAX: 8610-58748330 Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com ================================================== Dhruba Borthakur 2009-06-20 01:19 Please respond to general@hadoop.apache.org To general@hadoop.apache.org cc shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com Subject Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap Hi Hie, If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA and let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a while and it is good to get a an early start on it. thanks, dhruba On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced > soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. > > However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv > about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. > > ================================================== > True insight comes from within! > > Qiu Jie > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > IBM China Research Lab. > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > FAX: 8610-58748330 > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > ================================================== > > > > Andrew Wharton > 2009-06-20 00:10 > Please respond to > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > To > general@hadoop.apache.org > cc > > Subject > HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > Hello, > > My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will > be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the > expected delivery date of that release? > > Thanks. > > -- Andrew > > > --=_alternative 00600623482575DA_=-- From general-return-268-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:46:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58085 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:46:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:46:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 48889 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:46:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48818 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:46:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48808 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:46:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:46:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:46:12 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5JHjIYW019066; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:45:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=sgzFsloTusNfouIFrD0tWbE9PJXeu2y50TWAKtQw/GzV9MjVfh4DRksnrNCKMANO Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:45:18 -0700 Received: from 10.73.146.106 ([10.73.146.106]) by SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.84]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:44:55 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:44:54 -0700 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap From: Mahadev Konar To: CC: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: HDFS name node HA roadmap Thread-Index: AcnxBadBYwaT3PkG+02cKROvsirQFg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2009 17:45:18.0938 (UTC) FILETIME=[B61EEBA0:01C9F105] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Does anyone know the jira that shv (konstantin) has opened? mahadev On 6/19/09 10:28 AM, "Jie Qiu" wrote: > Hi, Dhruba, > > Yes, we plan to open a JIRA to let community to review our implementation > and give comments. Recently, we are going with IBM internal process before > submitting to the community. > > I also want to discuss with shv whether we need to another separate JIRA > or work on the same integrated JIRA. > > Do you any suggestion on this? > > ================================================== > True insight comes from within! > > Qiu Jie > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > IBM China Research Lab. > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > FAX: 8610-58748330 > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > ================================================== > > > > Dhruba Borthakur > 2009-06-20 01:19 > Please respond to > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > To > general@hadoop.apache.org > cc > shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com > Subject > Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > Hi Hie, > > If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA > and > let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a > while and it is good to get a an early start on it. > > thanks, > dhruba > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced >> soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. >> >> However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv >> about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. >> >> ================================================== >> True insight comes from within! >> >> Qiu Jie >> >> Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery >> IBM China Research Lab. >> Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 >> FAX: 8610-58748330 >> Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, >> Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 >> Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com >> ================================================== >> >> >> >> Andrew Wharton >> 2009-06-20 00:10 >> Please respond to >> general@hadoop.apache.org >> >> >> To >> general@hadoop.apache.org >> cc >> >> Subject >> HDFS name node HA roadmap >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will >> be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the >> expected delivery date of that release? >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Andrew >> >> >> > From general-return-269-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:51:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60453 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:51:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:51:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 55050 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:51:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55000 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:51:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54990 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:51:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:51:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.148 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.148] (HELO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:51:24 +0000 Received: from d23relay02.au.ibm.com (d23relay02.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.244]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5JHorRj031900 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:50:53 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay02.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5JHp0Kc643220 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:51:00 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5JHp0RD013192 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:51:00 +1000 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5JHouIn013159; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:50:57 +1000 In-Reply-To: To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: andrew.wharton@nokia.com, general@hadoop.apache.org, shv@yahoo-inc.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 Message-ID: From: Jie Qiu Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:51:01 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 06/20/2009 01:51:03, Serialize complete at 06/20/2009 01:51:03 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_related 00620AFB482575DA_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_related 00620AFB482575DA_= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00620AFB482575DA_=" --=_alternative 00620AFB482575DA_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5651 ================================================== True insight comes from within! Qiu Jie Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery IBM China Research Lab. Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 FAX: 8610-58748330 Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com ================================================== Mahadev Konar 2009-06-20 01:44 Please respond to general@hadoop.apache.org To cc , Subject Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap Does anyone know the jira that shv (konstantin) has opened? mahadev On 6/19/09 10:28 AM, "Jie Qiu" wrote: > Hi, Dhruba, > > Yes, we plan to open a JIRA to let community to review our implementation > and give comments. Recently, we are going with IBM internal process before > submitting to the community. > > I also want to discuss with shv whether we need to another separate JIRA > or work on the same integrated JIRA. > > Do you any suggestion on this? > > ================================================== > True insight comes from within! > > Qiu Jie > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > IBM China Research Lab. > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > FAX: 8610-58748330 > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > ================================================== > > > > Dhruba Borthakur > 2009-06-20 01:19 > Please respond to > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > To > general@hadoop.apache.org > cc > shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com > Subject > Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > Hi Hie, > > If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA > and > let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a > while and it is good to get a an early start on it. > > thanks, > dhruba > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced >> soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. >> >> However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv >> about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. >> >> ================================================== >> True insight comes from within! >> >> Qiu Jie >> >> Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery >> IBM China Research Lab. >> Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 >> FAX: 8610-58748330 >> Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, >> Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 >> Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com >> ================================================== >> >> >> >> Andrew Wharton >> 2009-06-20 00:10 >> Please respond to >> general@hadoop.apache.org >> >> >> To >> general@hadoop.apache.org >> cc >> >> Subject >> HDFS name node HA roadmap >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will >> be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the >> expected delivery date of that release? >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Andrew >> >> >> > --=_alternative 00620AFB482575DA_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5651



==================================================
True insight comes from within!

Qiu Jie

Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery
IBM China Research Lab.
Tel: 8610-58748086  Tieline: 905-8086
FAX: 8610-58748330          
Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094
Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com
==================================================



Mahadev Konar <mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>

2009-06-20 01:44
Please respond to
general@hadoop.apache.org

To
<general@hadoop.apache.org>
cc
<andrew.wharton@nokia.com>, <shv@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject
Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap





Does anyone know the jira that shv (konstantin) has opened?

mahadev


On 6/19/09 10:28 AM, "Jie Qiu" <qiujie@cn.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi, Dhruba,
>
> Yes, we plan to open a JIRA to let community to review our implementation
> and give comments. Recently, we are going with IBM internal process before
> submitting to the community.
>
> I also want to discuss with shv whether we need to another separate JIRA
> or work on the same integrated JIRA.
>
> Do you any suggestion on this?
>
> ==================================================
> True insight comes from within!
>
> Qiu Jie
>
> Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery
> IBM China Research Lab.
> Tel: 8610-58748086  Tieline: 905-8086
> FAX: 8610-58748330
> Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad,
> Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094
> Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com
> ==================================================
>
>
>
> Dhruba Borthakur <dhruba@gmail.com>
> 2009-06-20 01:19
> Please respond to
> general@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
> To
> general@hadoop.apache.org
> cc
> shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com
> Subject
> Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Hie,
>
> If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA
> and
> let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a
> while and it is good to get a an early start on it.
>
> thanks,
> dhruba
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu <qiujie@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced
>> soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue.
>>
>> However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv
>> about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together.
>>
>> ==================================================
>> True insight comes from within!
>>
>> Qiu Jie
>>
>> Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery
>> IBM China Research Lab.
>> Tel: 8610-58748086  Tieline: 905-8086
>> FAX: 8610-58748330
>> Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad,
>> Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094
>> Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com
>> ==================================================
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew Wharton <andrew.wharton@nokia.com>
>> 2009-06-20 00:10
>> Please respond to
>> general@hadoop.apache.org
>>
>>
>> To
>> general@hadoop.apache.org
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> HDFS name node HA roadmap
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will
>> be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the
>> expected delivery date of that release?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>


--=_alternative 00620AFB482575DA_=-- --=_related 00620AFB482575DA_=-- From general-return-270-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 17:55:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62435 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 17:55:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 17:55:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 58584 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:55:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58509 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 17:55:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47087 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 17:45:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Tu1VvEkpQVHd3pmYhPEfIuoPY44MPpoTmkHP/9UTpmrWFfnVAilxYLAR6C5V6lKl Message-ID: <4A3BCE76.5070503@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:44:22 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Qiu CC: general@hadoop.apache.org, andrew.wharton@nokia.com Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Jie Qiu, It would be interesting to see what your approach to HA is. Indeed, I had some ideas on how to implement it. And I would be happy to talk to you about it. Which jira do you refer to? Thanks, --Konstantin Jie Qiu wrote: > > Hi, Dhruba, > > Yes, we plan to open a JIRA to let community to review our > implementation and give comments. Recently, we are going with IBM > internal process before submitting to the community. > > I also want to discuss with shv whether we need to another separate JIRA > or work on the same integrated JIRA. > > Do you any suggestion on this? > > ================================================== > True insight comes from within! > > Qiu Jie > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > IBM China Research Lab. > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > FAX: 8610-58748330 > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > ================================================== > > > *Dhruba Borthakur * > > 2009-06-20 01:19 > Please respond to > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > To > general@hadoop.apache.org > cc > shv@yahoo-inc.com, andrew.wharton@nokia.com > Subject > Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > > > Hi Hie, > > If you are working on this one, it woudl be nice if you can open a JIRA and > let the community comment/review your design. This process usually takes a > while and it is good to get a an early start on it. > > thanks, > dhruba > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jie Qiu wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Yes, our IBM is implementing HA for Hadoop which will be open sourced > > soon. I think shv from Yahoo also post JIRA to describe this issue. > > > > However, our approach may be different with shv. Let me discuss with shv > > about how to combine our thoughts and implementation together. > > > > ================================================== > > True insight comes from within! > > > > Qiu Jie > > > > Autonomic Middleware and Service Delivery > > IBM China Research Lab. > > Tel: 8610-58748086 Tieline: 905-8086 > > FAX: 8610-58748330 > > Add.: Building 19 Zhongguancun Software Park, 8 Dongbeiwang WestRoad, > > Haidian District, Beijing,P.R.C.100094 > > Email: qiujie@cn.ibm.com > > ================================================== > > > > > > > > Andrew Wharton > > 2009-06-20 00:10 > > Please respond to > > general@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > To > > general@hadoop.apache.org > > cc > > > > Subject > > HDFS name node HA roadmap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > My understanding is that the HDFS name node single point of failure will > > be removed in Hadoop 0.21. Is that still the case? Also, what is the > > expected delivery date of that release? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- Andrew > > > > > > > From general-return-271-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 19 18:55:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95420 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 18:55:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 18:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 27615 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 18:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27542 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 18:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27532 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 18:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.100.122.230] (HELO mgw-mx03.nokia.com) (192.100.122.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:55:18 +0000 Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n5JIsl0O018601 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:54:52 +0300 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:54:53 +0300 Received: from mgw-da01.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.128.24]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:54:52 +0300 Received: from [172.19.167.46] (bsdhcp16746.americas.nokia.com [172.19.167.46]) by mgw-da01.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n5JIsm1E014353 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:54:49 +0300 Subject: Re: HDFS name node HA roadmap From: Andrew Wharton Reply-To: andrew.wharton@nokia.com To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Nokia, Inc. Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:54:49 -0400 Message-Id: <1245437689.5132.10.camel@1USL14830.NOE.Nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2009 18:54:52.0775 (UTC) FILETIME=[6DEBE770:01C9F10F] X-Nokia-AV: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I asked on the HBase list and they pointed me to this ticket, which is more to my liking: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4539 From general-return-272-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 14:56:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23999 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 14:56:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 14:56:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 58134 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 14:56:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58066 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 14:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58056 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 14:56:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.24] (HELO QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:56:26 +0000 Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 70Cb1c0020b6N64A22w5rn; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:56:05 +0000 Received: from [11.0.0.135] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 72vw1c00K2VBGtd8P2vzqv; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:56:03 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: [RESULT] Rename Core to Common Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:55:56 -0700 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but > rather just the common libraries. With 13 +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. I'll file the infrastructure ticket to rename the core-* mailing lists. -- Owen From general-return-273-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 16:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69777 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 16:31:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 16:31:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 72598 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 16:31:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72510 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 16:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72492 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 16:31:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.198] (snvvpn1-10-73-152-c147.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.147]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n5MGU7ML016726; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:30:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=nK00Umo7E4+ThnBj+TJf09saD9JDyrzO4ODrlWMRvJVldEphWDxut8p0pFLWa6UL Cc: , Message-Id: From: Alan Gates To: private@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:30:06 -0700 References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Downloaded, ran, ran tutorial, built piggybank. All looks good. +1 Alan. On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Hi, > > I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main feature of > this release is support for multiquery which allows to share > computation > across multiple queries within the same script. We see significant > performance improvements (up to order of magnitude) as the result of > this optimization. > > I ran the rat report and made sure that all the source files contain > proper headers. (Not attaching the report since it caused trouble with > the last release.) > > Keys used to sign the release candidate are at > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS. > > Please, download and try the release candidate: > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.3.0-candidate-0/. > > Please, vote by Wednesday, June 24th. > > Olga > From general-return-274-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 17:47:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6075 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 17:47:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 17:47:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 1720 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:47:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1618 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1587 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 17:47:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:47:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:47:06 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5MHkadQ078642; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=r936DlctCt35XOzpPMBLKW2tcuOTAVFoIoJlGIyxGCM4FNXB297zwUL4qjoe4gvL Cc: , Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: private@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:46:36 -0700 References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Hi, > > I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main feature of > this release is support for multiquery which allows to share > computation > across multiple queries within the same script. We see significant > performance improvements (up to order of magnitude) as the result of > this optimization. > +1 I downloaded the release, validated checksums and ran the unit-tests successfully. Arun From general-return-275-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 17:50:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9218 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 17:50:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 17:50:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8430 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:50:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8349 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8330 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 17:50:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:50:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:50:36 +0000 Received: from thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com (thickbeside-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.109.129]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n5MHmNor056432; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=lxRYjJPND7msLJDOUQb00XeFdNz2idtN7zD+kYvsRkrrmxUQyaO3MK9kplGrXeiY Cc: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: <41E637DE-95E5-411D-9245-577A8775ED50@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:48:23 -0700 References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Hi, > > I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main feature of > this release is support for multiquery which allows to share > computation > across multiple queries within the same script. We see significant > performance improvements (up to order of magnitude) as the result of > this optimization. > > I ran the rat report and made sure that all the source files contain > proper headers. (Not attaching the report since it caused trouble with > the last release.) > > Keys used to sign the release candidate are at > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS. > > Please, download and try the release candidate: > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.3.0-candidate-0/. > > Please, vote by Wednesday, June 24th. > > Olga > From general-return-276-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 17:51:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10133 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 17:51:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 17:51:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10302 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:51:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10206 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 17:51:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10123 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 17:51:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:51:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:51:43 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5MHp0uB086457; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:51:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:cc:x-originalarrivaltime; b=ycgKolX/LpQY26G9HDKFhsYfYK5/ndfnNdAOXH/4xjwEp1iH9Xq6CeUVKD53+2jY Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:51:01 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:52:22 -0700 Message-ID: <11ED50FC7C760F4EA9F44109C531617D03F57BD8@SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Thread-Index: AcnzV/Hj+K85wPcbSnOP7XUOod/72QACSIqw References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> From: "Pradeep Kamath" To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2009 17:51:01.0237 (UTC) FILETIME=[0162DA50:01C9F362] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for release. -Pradeep -----Original Message----- From: Alan Gates [mailto:gates@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:30 AM To: private@hadoop.apache.org Cc: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Downloaded, ran, ran tutorial, built piggybank. All looks good. +1 Alan. On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: > Hi, > > I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main feature of > this release is support for multiquery which allows to share =20 > computation > across multiple queries within the same script. We see significant > performance improvements (up to order of magnitude) as the result of > this optimization. > > I ran the rat report and made sure that all the source files contain > proper headers. (Not attaching the report since it caused trouble with > the last release.) > > Keys used to sign the release candidate are at > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS. > > Please, download and try the release candidate: > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.3.0-candidate-0/. > > Please, vote by Wednesday, June 24th. > > Olga > From general-return-277-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 22 22:31:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44752 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 22:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 57525 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 22:31:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57445 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2009 22:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57435 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2009 22:31:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:31:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lenz.grimmer@googlemail.com designates 209.85.221.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.178] (HELO mail-qy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.221.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:31:11 +0000 Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so4435213qyk.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:openpgp :content-type; bh=nZCChYp3KgJMJdMMPL54e6VdpYX3UQeqnHBvTo8LRU4=; b=npaF6qii6VzQ9l1MKlnoiheTTOcwcojSjiftwLBvwyrCubzRjPVloRTUJuz5l1DGo+ l4r8Osx7/tZDJVtjfxo6WFHU82bBohMFuFoehLrcWZ8j+yP8HBD92UlbiRf9EV0SG0CN wNpMNY0OFIgiv8QSOQ2qVIwVoyhxOLkpNr+P4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=PFbf5NoY10QEEiL4BvPOaJ+NeBSEba5JrblOSUPywRthFeMMvNX8PfInRUwG0UMFIg DCezp7vugQ9gDVVAFyvw5TA8HU8RfyWPOnnqLHbVp6kTnuYhg0JtimxfJVk5wcnvtA4D OBnv9xkH0/5zheHqqIbbgkGjtIRSup+YnxJns= Received: by 10.224.67.196 with SMTP id s4mr5526195qai.198.1245709850970; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.107? (c172212.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.172.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1041968qwg.5.2009.06.22.15.30.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Lenz Grimmer Message-ID: <4A400607.4050102@grimmer.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:30:31 +0200 From: Lenz Grimmer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Call for Participation: OpenSQL Camp at FrOSCon (St. Augustin, Germany, 22+23 August 2009) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=B27291F2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig40065C80C96752B5A0CFEAC8" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------enig40065C80C96752B5A0CFEAC8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, OpenSQL Camp is a free conference of, by, and for the open-source databas= e community of users and developers. The OpenSQLCamp 2009, European Edition= (http://opensqlcamp.org/) will take part in parallel to the Free and Open= Source Conference 2009 (http://froscon.org/) on Saturday 22nd and Sunday = 23rd August in St. Augustin, Germany, which is located close to Bonn and Colog= ne. The goal of this event is to spread the word about the vibrant communitie= s and large ecosystems that exist around Open Source Databases and to educate t= he attendees about possible alternatives to commercial databases. It is a pl= ace where people come to learn, to participate and to contribute. We would like to invite your project to participate in this event. We've set up a call for participation (http://opensqlcamp.org/Events/2009/Call_for_Participation) - the deadlin= e for submitting your proposal is *July 19th*. We are seeking talks related to Open Source Databases of all kind, not ju= st relational databases! Submission about tools and technologies related to = OSS databases (e.g. connectors/APIs) are also welcome. Some ideas and for submissions: * An introduction/overview about a certain database project/product or related tool * Providing "best practices" information for administrators * A deeply technical and developer-centric session about some project's internals or an API used to connect to a database We look forward to your contribution! Please don't hesitate to contact us= via IRC (#opensqlcamp on FreeNode) or our Discussion Group (http://groups.google.com/group/opensqlcamp) Thanks! Bye, LenZ --=20 Lenz Grimmer - http://www.lenzg.net/ --------------enig40065C80C96752B5A0CFEAC8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKQAYHSVDhKrJykfIRAjDGAJ4vaxF9EjfuIRSE/KThla/rKJ9FbQCdGN4x HJ6Y8VG6WIUw/B3oAqjswNg= =cWKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig40065C80C96752B5A0CFEAC8-- From general-return-278-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 24 19:24:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47524 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2009 19:24:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2009 19:24:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2155 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 19:24:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2078 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 19:24:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1837 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2009 19:24:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:24:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:24:12 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n5OJMQJE032223; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=OTXgfzY/jNjpY4QMEvIdFEjHT5mETWT4krcOyteV3nihIQJdv1Schz2B0u8fPqU8 Received: from SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.87]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:22:26 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:21:40 -0700 Message-ID: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103CBD0CE@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) Thread-Index: AcnwSzdeHvsmuCnUSiKzZJzKb8waJwEtL+zQ References: <236D5828CF7F5749AF1BCB7F87596DE103BA3E9D@SNV-EXVS09.ds.corp.yahoo.com> From: "Olga Natkovich" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2009 19:22:26.0122 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B7562A0:01C9F501] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, =20 Thanks for everybody who voted! We have four +1 binding votes from PMC members Arun Murthy, Nigel Daley, Alan Gates, and Olga Natkovich. We have three +1 non-binding votes from Pig Committers Pradeep Kamath, Daniel Dai, and Santhosh Srinivasan There are no -1 votes. Also sufficient time has passed to make the release official. =20 Unless I hear otherwise, I am going to start publishing the release shortly. =20 Olga=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:30 PM > To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; private@hadoop.apache.org;=20 > general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.3.0 (candidate 0) >=20 > Hi, > =20 > I created a candidate build for Pig 0.3.0 release. The main=20 > feature of this release is support for multiquery which=20 > allows to share computation across multiple queries within=20 > the same script. We see significant performance improvements=20 > (up to order of magnitude) as the result of this optimization. > =20 > I ran the rat report and made sure that all the source files=20 > contain proper headers. (Not attaching the report since it=20 > caused trouble with the last release.) > =20 > Keys used to sign the release candidate are at=20 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS. > =20 > Please, download and try the release candidate: > http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-0.3.0-candidate-0/. > =20 > Please, vote by Wednesday, June 24th. > =20 > Olga > =20 >=20 From general-return-279-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 27 04:04:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47884 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2009 04:04:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2009 04:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 83664 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2009 04:04:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83577 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2009 04:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83567 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2009 04:04:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:04:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.211] (HELO QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:04:16 +0000 Received: from OMTA16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8rcG1c0051uE5Es5Bs3wRa; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:03:56 +0000 Received: from [11.0.0.135] ([209.131.62.115]) by OMTA16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8s4o1c0072VBGtd3cs4shy; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:04:57 +0000 Message-Id: <7934684D-B188-428E-B817-6B188CB977A2@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:03:44 -0700 References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better > reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but > rather just the common libraries. With 12 +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. I've filed INFRA-2116 to rename the mailing lists. The subversion rename I did as part of the project split. -- Owen From general-return-280-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 07:15:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54728 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 07:15:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 07:15:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 50360 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 07:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50291 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 07:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50281 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 07:15:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.159] (HELO mail-gx0-f159.google.com) (209.85.217.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:15:34 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so353808gxk.5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:15:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=fcx1Od0IbEBsv0p21AGz9Zw5aj1PtVN1D3UvRqZw/w4=; b=TMD/dpU/tfGfX3wJyAuJ+JEQcilMAltPZSmaP5KfI+c9i+arX+Ki7lHvensDrMjA0z tw1o9lqwmtwy7k4pm2riNAN8Di5UngYSCov0drp5QnCHQKZ7/qLtJhHVjpwtSCOLXxL0 dRm3Qqgl4TLCk1ZMuSdHjxvaNNktTng5alZUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Z7wRf3f7XOoYp/29e9sp3tkCTzmvIXjyJiHcEuyCErDWPfUKOrsTknKnkq4wDCM4QE lW0QFSkA7t6uKcVCeUC/G89WyhCK5RLoU26RPiCXcC0AxZZQP6FxhuYDgcYpxbycfVwS 7fUsVhtS8jUHz/ELVMP7WTG57lnuSglFr3zKw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.16.138 with SMTP id o10mr1186611iba.13.1246346111615; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org, C J Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325574d2a400486046d8b9107 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000325574d2a400486046d8b9107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Help help help, I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run Hadoop 0.18.3. *My settings:* 1. I am on LINUX 2. Using the Java 1.6.0 3. I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop *Working steps:* 1. I have succeeded to run it on the local 2. I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes 3. I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. *Current status:* 1. I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed operatio= n 2. I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the following: - On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: 134.130.223.58:1 134.130.223.72:1 134.130.223.85:1 134.130.223.92:1 - My own machine has the following ip address 134.130.222.54 - The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D500* *export JAVA_HOME=3D"/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_HOME=3D"/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* *export HADOOP_VERSION=3D"0.18.3"* *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* - The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: ** ** ** ** * * * Hadoop Quickstart* * Page 3* * Copyright =A9 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved= .* * fs.default.name* * 134.130.223.85:9000* * * * * * mapred.job.tracker* * 134.130.223.58:1* * * * * * dfs.name.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* * * * * * dfs.data.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* * * * * * mapred.system.dir* * systemtina* * * * * * mapred.local.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* * * * * - The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: 134.130.223.72 134.130.222.54 134.130.223.92 - from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new namenode= , started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce (bin/start-mapred.sh) *Problem:* Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the local operation) in the folder us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to loca= l operation by typing *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* Then I got the following error: *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.java= :377) * *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:3= 9) * *at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImp= l.java:25) * *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSyste= m.java:67) * *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354)* *... 11 more* *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574)* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)= * *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* *... 23 more* * Questions* 1. Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before starting new ones. Thank you, C.J --000325574d2a400486046d8b9107-- From general-return-281-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 13:24:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85999 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 13:24:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 13:24:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 95570 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 13:24:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95478 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 13:24:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95468 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 13:24:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:24:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yeahyf@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:24:05 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so59146qwd.35 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:23:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G1hxWOXKv/Lz3wLdTQ+PRQxo2elNwEvWMWTE8TXr+f4=; b=x9i6cb+SCxJm5gxol1gq4O8gAJzC6jHwWvNLzDo2KjvZEL4Hd7mk99fUznuA1N9Hw3 VZxUHj2GtPbhU/5rD/PKhuu/u11YnGYp03NvQJlOgXfWLF52PE67TwlGXLQVd9pE4lF3 HpeW51V1jMODXRb9mMLuAG5gn/faZvBll40t8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QxrBJwIqaGM0iDWlNPWqAMSByX2mgnbaG0xD6HBqFWfZhRgrfQrEIeStjv/tweRQKB oB1Ta9QblSOrHDEqNK9hS7nTOhPAxMgu5sHykhz0/+TEk7I/xYj1TqSCm+jkUM9yT9rr 70fY+bHnd4qaORKBAVexhfWWRLFnq8qwCVzvQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.89.202 with SMTP id f10mr1937545qcm.71.1246368223536; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:23:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7934684D-B188-428E-B817-6B188CB977A2@apache.org> References: <094B4654-8D07-4251-B521-9EAFAAFBCB4E@yahoo-inc.com> <7934684D-B188-428E-B817-6B188CB977A2@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:23:43 +0800 Message-ID: <3b13e4710906300623g3b042ff9h7da21cb6dd2a62a4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Core to Common From: =?GB2312?B?0e634Q==?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee0c43982b5046d90b7a3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364ee0c43982b5046d90b7a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 2009/6/27 Owen O'Malley > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > I'd like to propose that we rename Core to Common. This will better >> reflect the fact that it is no longer the "core" of Hadoop, but rather just >> the common libraries. >> > > With 12 +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. I've filed INFRA-2116 to rename > the mailing lists. The subversion rename I did as part of the project split. > > -- Owen > --0016364ee0c43982b5046d90b7a3-- From general-return-282-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 15:06:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39674 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 15:06:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 15:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 32042 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 15:06:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32000 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 15:06:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31963 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 15:06:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:06:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.196] (HELO mail-pz0-f196.google.com) (209.85.222.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:06:21 +0000 Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so164651pzk.5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JCAoeRlLNLNRASMeIpv9zCGeBtF6UIRUwJpqQ0IhUAw=; b=ksmzCTMF64uhSLYvWLcDkn58W15wPEMzB+bEccM6oHzlH6bk3B7XMnsE9lCWBfFBxF Aubn8EKtcBGaHvrAqvpKeTQ/7OqcYQeuOUh2ND8y3qto4Dn1h8H4om4X0oki5p60Cpav H1UzXJQ5mWDmRQpS6glMcvynZlV3FSxqti5FI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Dkdg8kEG4hdStKz04QJkLBasZGEipRFAF9OHHp+W8xE97LuXipvGKOkV7PpiK14/ar tZTtzmn1j08rjjos2vcp1L4s9kBsEhpX1zI2tHkDnZfqlIK2yzTZw/owM6m4+IChIp/6 SLfgED0vX01keVJDjz1sjMcspsXvkEAGAHkEI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.26.19 with SMTP id d19mr1773091rvj.100.1246374359765; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:05:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3c682ecd0906300805s1f6f5bd7x3eedfe4360413c10@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd14deef89225046d9224ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd14deef89225046d9224ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Did you format the namenode: $bin/hadoop namenode -format before starting all $bin/start-all.sh? http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/quickstart.html On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:15 AM, C J wrote: > Help help help, > > I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run > Hadoop 0.18.3. > > > *My settings:* > > 1. > > I am on LINUX > 2. > > Using the Java 1.6.0 > 3. > > I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop > > > *Working steps:* > > 1. > > I have succeeded to run it on the local > 2. > > I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate > > Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes > 3. > > I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to > > run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. > > *Current status:* > > 1. > > I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed operati= on > 2. > > I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the > following: > > > - > > On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: > > 134.130.223.58:1 > > 134.130.223.72:1 > > 134.130.223.85:1 > > 134.130.223.92:1 > - > > My own machine has the following ip address > > 134.130.222.54 > - > > The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: > > *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D500* > > *export JAVA_HOME=3D"/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* > > *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_HOME=3D"/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_VERSION=3D"0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* > - > > The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > * * > > * Hadoop Quickstart* > > * Page 3* > > * Copyright =A9 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserve= d.* > > * fs.default.name* > > * 134.130.223.85:9000* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.job.tracker* > > * 134.130.223.58:1* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.name.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.data.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.system.dir* > > * systemtina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.local.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* > > * * > > * * > > > > > > - > > The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: > > 134.130.223.72 > > 134.130.222.54 > > 134.130.223.92 > - > > from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new namenod= e, > started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce > (bin/start-mapred.sh) > > > *Problem:* > > Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the > local operation) in the folder > > us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to > local > operation by typing > > *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount > usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* > > Then I got the following error: > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a > deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* > > *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* > > *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / > 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358= )* > > *at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.ja= va:377) > * > > *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* > > *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* > > *at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java= :39) > * > > *at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25) > * > > *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000 faile= d > on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)= * > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* > > *at > > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSys= tem.java:67) > * > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339= )* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354= )* > > *... 11 more* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574= )* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* > > *... 23 more* > > > > > * Questions* > > 1. > > Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? > > P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before > > starting new ones. > > > Thank you, > > C.J > --000e0cd14deef89225046d9224ec-- From general-return-283-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 15:30:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49997 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 15:30:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 15:30:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4469 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 15:31:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4433 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 15:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4423 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 15:31:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:31:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [12.110.209.161] (HELO usausmgw01.spansion.com) (12.110.209.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:30:53 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5661"; a="5251915" Received: from usausexbh2.spansion.com ([10.248.26.116]) by usausmgw01.spansion.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2009 08:30:31 -0700 Received: from USAUSEXMBPF2.spansion.com ([10.248.26.56]) by usausexbh2.spansion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:30:31 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:30:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation thread-index: Acn5UpbgRxUobXuTT6qUIW9qyw4lIwAQ6XFw References: From: "Gross, Danny" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2009 15:30:31.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4147FB0:01C9F997] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, I suggest that you check iptables on your systems. At one time, one of my nodes showed a similar error, and this was the culprit. Good luck, Danny -----Original Message----- From: C J [mailto:xine.jar@googlemail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:15 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; C J Subject: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation Help help help, I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run Hadoop 0.18.3. *My settings:* 1. I am on LINUX 2. Using the Java 1.6.0 3. I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop *Working steps:* 1. I have succeeded to run it on the local 2. I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes 3. I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. *Current status:* 1. I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed operation 2. I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the following: - On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: 134.130.223.58:1 134.130.223.72:1 134.130.223.85:1 134.130.223.92:1 - My own machine has the following ip address 134.130.222.54 - The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D500* *export JAVA_HOME=3D"/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* *export = HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* *export HADOOP_HOME=3D"/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* *export HADOOP_VERSION=3D"0.18.3"* *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* - The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: ** ** ** ** * * * Hadoop Quickstart* * Page 3* * Copyright (c) 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.* * fs.default.name* * 134.130.223.85:9000* * * * * * mapred.job.tracker* * 134.130.223.58:1* * * * * * dfs.name.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* * * * * * dfs.data.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* * * * * * mapred.system.dir* * systemtina* * * * * * mapred.local.dir* * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* * * * * - The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: 134.130.223.72 134.130.222.54 134.130.223.92 - from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new namenode, started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce (bin/start-mapred.sh) *Problem:* Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the local operation) in the folder us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to local operation by typing *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* Then I got the following error: *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.j ava:377) * *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav a:39) * *at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor Impl.java:25) * *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSy stem.java:67) * *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354)* *... 11 more* *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574)* *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* *... 23 more* * Questions* 1. Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before starting new ones. Thank you, C.J From general-return-284-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 17:19:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 453 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 17:19:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 17:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28477 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28397 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28387 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 17:19:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.221.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.189] (HELO mail-qy0-f189.google.com) (209.85.221.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:27 +0000 Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so316416qyk.5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q/0u6BWFS8gdOfNrGt80OlMf6DyUtb2aT5GmEDIVorU=; b=Lu3tKilu7zL7MHPkq7asxoya+nGCi0eZctWapFuRHxv/NcWxmyj/4b8IAy6D5CR4eE hm0eFFD1eoKf3lzlJ2gzgwEPmnPRKFlx8x9uUN+gB03M5KRBuBwaKrG2WGm0mKMyk60n zjCLL7DRN9u778e3bxy7IT5CoxzKYnXQxHP/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Z8B7y9ypLVrMrNVk1gVg4Njz3tuWpItUFz1I644UTh5kQPTRU4JBxL8ZEg/K16Vwgy j/WuQzO0N0LYfIDZDX5/+RnXi0+HHdNTe2C0IaxNx/V84dGuPUvWKEoG4z8ITSD70rlo 6DNIHdda+zt2KOQohF/MgU7oXi7clilM9MNJo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.11 with SMTP id a11mr1459214ibd.38.1246382345016; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3c682ecd0906300805s1f6f5bd7x3eedfe4360413c10@mail.gmail.com> References: <3c682ecd0906300805s1f6f5bd7x3eedfe4360413c10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:19:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d6d75ede519046d940013 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d6d75ede519046d940013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes of course I did, but the error is the same. What else shall I try? On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Abhishek Verma w= rote: > Did you format the namenode: > > $bin/hadoop namenode -format > > before starting all > $bin/start-all.sh? > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/quickstart.html > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:15 AM, C J wrote: > > > Help help help, > > > > I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run > > Hadoop 0.18.3. > > > > > > *My settings:* > > > > 1. > > > > I am on LINUX > > 2. > > > > Using the Java 1.6.0 > > 3. > > > > I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop > > > > > > *Working steps:* > > > > 1. > > > > I have succeeded to run it on the local > > 2. > > > > I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate > > > > Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes > > 3. > > > > I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to > > > > run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. > > > > *Current status:* > > > > 1. > > > > I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed > operation > > 2. > > > > I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the > > following: > > > > > > - > > > > On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: > > > > 134.130.223.58:1 > > > > 134.130.223.72:1 > > > > 134.130.223.85:1 > > > > 134.130.223.92:1 > > - > > > > My own machine has the following ip address > > > > 134.130.222.54 > > - > > > > The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: > > > > *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D500* > > > > *export JAVA_HOME=3D"/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* > > > > *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* > > > > *export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremo= te > > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* > > > > *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > > > *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* > > > > *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > > > *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* > > > > *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > > > *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* > > > > *export HADOOP_HOME=3D"/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* > > > > *export HADOOP_VERSION=3D"0.18.3"* > > > > *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* > > - > > > > The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: > > > > ** > > > > ** > > > > ** > > > > ** > > > > * * > > > > * Hadoop Quickstart* > > > > * Page 3* > > > > * Copyright =A9 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights > reserved.* > > > > * fs.default.name* > > > > * 134.130.223.85:9000* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > * mapred.job.tracker* > > > > * 134.130.223.58:1* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > * dfs.name.dir* > > > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > * dfs.data.dir* > > > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > * mapred.system.dir* > > > > * systemtina* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > * mapred.local.dir* > > > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* > > > > * * > > > > * * > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: > > > > 134.130.223.72 > > > > 134.130.222.54 > > > > 134.130.223.92 > > - > > > > from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new > namenode, > > started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce > > (bin/start-mapred.sh) > > > > > > *Problem:* > > > > Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the > > local operation) in the folder > > > > us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to > > local > > operation by typing > > > > *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount > > usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* > > > > Then I got the following error: > > > > > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a > > deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* > > > > *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / > > 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: > > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358)* > > > > *at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.ja= va:377) > > * > > > > *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* > > > > *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* > > > > *at > > > > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java= :39) > > * > > > > *at > > > > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI= mpl.java:25) > > * > > > > *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* > > > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000fail= ed > > on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* > > > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* > > > > *at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSys= tem.java:67) > > * > > > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* > > > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354)* > > > > *... 11 more* > > > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* > > > > *at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574)* > > > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* > > > > *at > > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)= * > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178= )* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* > > > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* > > > > *... 23 more* > > > > > > > > > > * Questions* > > > > 1. > > > > Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? > > > > P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before > > > > starting new ones. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > C.J > > > --0022152d6d75ede519046d940013-- From general-return-285-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 17:25:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 17:25:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 17:25:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 36681 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:25:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36636 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36626 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 17:25:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xine.jar@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.159] (HELO mail-gx0-f159.google.com) (209.85.217.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:14 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so18114gxk.5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=12H9RtgBdKBMYt3oz8clWZ2/t24ibJaUIM3BfcpCpGI=; b=o6Uuj2M0HCXMSx4TltjOHFxcuIaPJvr22aenTn068pigSXq78WERH6cfsrS4fSN2lJ +Q3xGtR5Xwe33nrTXabA4eSSxR9a0+nM8itxUHEcPFE+aOdJ/uY9oXN8v1cdq046kqNA nffNmRx2CljtanPODNIDL3ufkeE+l/i6Sflng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FidCaLqRWiQ+yZNjWmgL64PMWN2Sotju2EFSwyQZMdDiUHyfBjsZ+S/SPwwTGOaHkC lAuCBSnNSDnQot6BDJWmWJV1kxLF7FuVv4RPh2xRk7OHUBcrdFZXaZ8qrLHztpm2hBp8 fhw+WVUOViZsC2+yPRACP1ns4l5Qg34CdRzKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.32.141 with SMTP id c13mr1319471ibd.25.1246382691033; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:24:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:24:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation From: C J To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d5cf98ded6d046d94150c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022152d5cf98ded6d046d94150c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Danny, can you be a bit more precise what was wrong in your iptable? thank you On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Gross, Danny wrote: > Hello, > > I suggest that you check iptables on your systems. At one time, one of > my nodes showed a similar error, and this was the culprit. > > Good luck, > > Danny > > -----Original Message----- > From: C J [mailto:xine.jar@googlemail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:15 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org; C J > Subject: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation > > Help help help, > > I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run > Hadoop 0.18.3. > > > *My settings:* > > 1. > > I am on LINUX > 2. > > Using the Java 1.6.0 > 3. > > I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop > > > *Working steps:* > > 1. > > I have succeeded to run it on the local > 2. > > I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate > > Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes > 3. > > I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to > > run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. > > *Current status:* > > 1. > > I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed > operation > 2. > > I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the > following: > > > - > > On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: > > 134.130.223.58:1 > > 134.130.223.72:1 > > 134.130.223.85:1 > > 134.130.223.92:1 > - > > My own machine has the following ip address > > 134.130.222.54 > - > > The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: > > *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=500* > > *export JAVA_HOME="/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* > > *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_HOME="/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_VERSION="0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* > - > > The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > * * > > * Hadoop Quickstart* > > * Page 3* > > * Copyright (c) 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights > reserved.* > > * fs.default.name* > > * 134.130.223.85:9000* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.job.tracker* > > * 134.130.223.58:1* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.name.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.data.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.system.dir* > > * systemtina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.local.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* > > * * > > * * > > > > > > - > > The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: > > 134.130.223.72 > > 134.130.222.54 > > 134.130.223.92 > - > > from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new > namenode, > started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce > (bin/start-mapred.sh) > > > *Problem:* > > Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the > local operation) in the folder > > us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to > local > operation by typing > > *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount > usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* > > Then I got the following error: > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a > deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* > > *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* > > *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / > 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.j > ava:377) > * > > *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* > > *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* > > *at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav > a:39) > * > > *at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor > Impl.java:25) > * > > *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000 > failed > on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSy > stem.java:67) > * > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354)* > > *... 11 more* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* > > *at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574)* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* > > *... 23 more* > > > > > * Questions* > > 1. > > Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? > > P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before > > starting new ones. > > > Thank you, > > C.J > --0022152d5cf98ded6d046d94150c-- From general-return-286-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 17:55:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24451 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 17:55:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 17:55:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 76129 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:55:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76043 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 17:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76031 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 17:55:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:55:32 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com (battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.112.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n5UHrTvh045000 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=iR79m6lW69oPC4UBwdp3k4q3wQ2syV3yqFPQnXALkscG9tqOWXytEw4IqNA1KAOQ Message-Id: From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: jira notifications on common, hdfs, and mapreduce Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:53:29 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, As we voted on core-dev, I just changed the jira notifications to: create/resolved/reopen events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-dev all jira events are sent to {common,mapreduce,hdfs}-issues -- Owen From general-return-287-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 30 18:55:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58968 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2009 18:55:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2009 18:55:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 56306 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 18:55:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56241 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2009 18:55:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56231 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2009 18:55:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [12.110.209.161] (HELO usausmgw01.spansion.com) (12.110.209.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:55:42 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5662"; a="5254637" Received: from usausexbh1.spansion.com ([10.248.26.58]) by usausmgw01.spansion.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2009 11:55:08 -0700 Received: from USAUSEXMBPF2.spansion.com ([10.248.26.56]) by USAUSEXBH1.spansion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:55:08 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:55:08 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation thread-index: Acn5p8Nqp8fKi3I5SOi++zWBapY+qwACeW2A References: From: "Gross, Danny" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2009 18:55:08.0612 (UTC) FILETIME=[49E7B040:01C9F9B4] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi CJ, One of my CentOS systems was built with the full installation. This installed a base iptables ruleset (sorry, I didn't keep the output from that). All my other systems looked like this: [root@msddl01 ~]# iptables --list Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination =20 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination =20 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination I cleared the iptables for my problem system with the following: /sbin/iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -Z /sbin/iptables -F Once that was done, my node responded to the cluster, accepted jobs, etc. One thing I'm not clear on from your description below: Do your HDFS and map/reduce management web interfaces come up once you start dfs and mapred? My habit is: - hadoop namenode -format (1st time) - start-dfs.sh - start-mapred.sh - Check HDFS web interface -- status of HDFS nodes.=20 - Check map/reduce web interface -- status of task trackers. - Make sure that both HDFS and map/reduce interfaces show as up and running before kicking off jobs. HDFS will go into standby mode, and mapreduce will show initializing at times. Hope it helps. Best regards, Danny -----Original Message----- From: C J [mailto:xine.jar@googlemail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:25 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation Hi Danny, can you be a bit more precise what was wrong in your iptable? thank you On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Gross, Danny wrote: > Hello, > > I suggest that you check iptables on your systems. At one time, one of > my nodes showed a similar error, and this was the culprit. > > Good luck, > > Danny > > -----Original Message----- > From: C J [mailto:xine.jar@googlemail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:15 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org; C J > Subject: problem with running WordCode v0 with a distributed operation > > Help help help, > > I am a new user, it has been already 2-3 weeks that I am trying to run > Hadoop 0.18.3. > > > *My settings:* > > 1. > > I am on LINUX > 2. > > Using the Java 1.6.0 > 3. > > I have unpacked the hadoop-0.18.3 folder directly on the desktop > > > *Working steps:* > > 1. > > I have succeeded to run it on the local > 2. > > I went through the quick start tutorial and managed to operate > > Hadoop in the standalone and the Pseudo-distributed motes > 3. > > I started going through the map/reduce tutorial and managed to > > run the WordCount v1.0 with a standalone operation. > > *Current status:* > > 1. > > I would like to run the WordCount v1.0 example on a distributed > operation > 2. > > I went through the steps in the cluster setup tutorial and did the > following: > > > - > > On a distant server I am running 4 virtual machines: > > 134.130.223.58:1 > > 134.130.223.72:1 > > 134.130.223.85:1 > > 134.130.223.92:1 > - > > My own machine has the following ip address > > 134.130.222.54 > - > > The hadoop-en.sh file is the same on all the five machines: > > *export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3D500* > > *export JAVA_HOME=3D"/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14"* > > *export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote > $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote * > > *$HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS"* > > *export HADOOP_HOME=3D"/root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_VERSION=3D"0.18.3"* > > *export HADOOP_LOG_DIR=3D${HADOOP_HOME}/logs* > - > > The hadoop-site.xml is the same on all the five machines: > > ** > > ** > > ** > > ** > > * * > > * Hadoop Quickstart* > > * Page 3* > > * Copyright (c) 2007 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights > reserved.* > > * fs.default.name* > > * 134.130.223.85:9000* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.job.tracker* > > * 134.130.223.58:1* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.name.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/logstina* > > * * > > * * > > * dfs.data.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/blockstina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.system.dir* > > * systemtina* > > * * > > * * > > * mapred.local.dir* > > * /root/Desktop/hadoop-0.18.3/tempMapReducetina* > > * * > > * * > > > > > > - > > The slaves file is the same on all five machines and contains: > > 134.130.223.72 > > 134.130.222.54 > > 134.130.223.92 > - > > from the Namenode machine 134.130.223.85 I have formatted a new > namenode, > started the hdfs (bin/start-dfs.sh) and started the Map-reduce > (bin/start-mapred.sh) > > > *Problem:* > > Si Since the jar file of the WordCount was already created (by the > local operation) in the folder > > us usr/tina, I tried running directly the application similarly to > local > operation by typing > > *$bin/hadoop jar usr/tina/wordcount.jar org.myorg.WordCount > usr/tina/wordcount/input usr/tina/wordcount/output.* > > Then I got the following error: > > > > *09/06/29 19:38:05 WARN fs.FileSystem: "134.130.223.85:9000" is a > deprecated filesystem name. Use "hdfs://134.130.223.85:9000/" instead.* > > *09/06/29 19:38:06 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 0 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:07 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 1 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:08 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 2 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:09 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 3 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:10 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 4 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:11 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 5 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:12 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 6 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:13 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 7 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:14 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 8 time(s).* > > *09/06/29 19:38:15 INFO ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: / > 134.130.223.85:9000. Already tried 9 time(s).* > > *java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.ConnectException: Call to / > 134.130.223.85:9000 failed on connection exception: > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:358)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.setInputPaths(FileInputFormat.j > ava:377) > * > > *at org.myorg.WordCount.main(WordCount.java:53)* > > *at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* > > *at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav > a:39) > * > > *at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor > Impl.java:25) > * > > *at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Call to /134.130.223.85:9000 > failed > on connection exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.wrapException(Client.java:743)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:719)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:216)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.$Proxy0.getProtocolVersion(Unknown Source)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC.getProxy(RPC.java:348)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.createRPCNamenode(DFSClient.java:103)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient.(DFSClient.java:172)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSy > stem.java:67) > * > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:118)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getWorkingDirectory(JobConf.java:354)* > > *... 11 more* > > *Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)* > > *at > sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:574)* > > *at sun.nio.ch.SocketAdaptor.connect(SocketAdaptor.java:100)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.setupIOstreams(Client.java:301)* > > *at > org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1700(Client.java:178)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.getConnection(Client.java:820)* > > *at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:705)* > > *... 23 more* > > > > > * Questions* > > 1. > > Can someone help me in solving/debugging this problem? > > P.S: I have tried to stop the HDFS with bin/stop-dfs.sh before > > starting new ones. > > > Thank you, > > C.J > From general-return-2647-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 02 23:20:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35317 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2011 23:20:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2011 23:20:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 37691 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 23:20:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37475 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 23:20:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37467 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2011 23:20:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:20:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:19:59 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so5265641vws.35 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:19:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rGWghuD+E62mBN4ETFLpEkwfAY+WRXW/V12FX/PdHAE=; b=Jj+lrY88YL0PSfXJtma/jlktT5hjm3QuuXDLEdiwP7hWUooIRAlfwHu4JhfbTro5N2 fs21JngTsy5YuK92RFj1BfgNQfJp3QA/v+1VRwGiK6lKl4O25wkDsIRryZNtcdRc5Eks k4aizJ9sS9M4mSDK6APkyQsXFKHISp5SgRzBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VFu07l6It8KjhY9AXw0sxcj3k7Q2NPPk1P/o4hLcPmvLWyXyKgr0eGeUtyomV2XIyo 2oxn57CbKAuFzFiaWWHbzKC0w/v1OEzLMr+6P4fMojAq2vWe6IWMbVwacT6TTmUPnTqc uoK+MuSExK7AqGLdDbfKfZrlULuRhyFjd3tFM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.193.8 with SMTP id ds8mr2485890vcb.159.1294010376512; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:19:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:19:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 18:19:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the response. It would be nice to have a feature like this. It will make our data nodes much more flexible. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Hi, > > Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with > this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, > reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it >> possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% >> usage? > > According to the release's code: No. > > (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not recommended.) > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > From general-return-2648-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 02 23:48:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41483 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2011 23:48:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2011 23:48:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 56412 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 23:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56364 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2011 23:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56356 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2011 23:48:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.69.23] (HELO web30006.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.69.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:48:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 26956 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2011 23:48:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294012098; bh=k02A2RmxG5YdHlm+FOAgIYAVadISeudPoYt0liIbTMI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VJUrVhDLmEnCNSmjRmbvANcrWXIwWsNI2MDb4SkrEGReEi14rwkXH8WBXMrHsQV71Uj3k9lfuKtCDQRoWAu23TfykRWWFQ5h8UFUR/bfo0iV/o87DTg7ySGqh1B6xiOcgpAcuf9fnt0r5uzvke+PvQbhVhD3WKyOCOPo2pApcTA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rtGl545D+3bWe2LaXiKpYH5wT7NNiSHVNzFdMANakJ7/ix5CR7WNCKL9tgRLJPN0QKP5kti34RHVObbl/9rp8V3XqzrbqzDPZbXwpocjD3uVYZ8omvZiQHyc+gsXE5oeuhu84PleN454R/DN2PtajpUkginEWa15q2rxlxxOCsk=; Message-ID: <615288.25718.qm@web30006.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: S0pxn5UVM1mXhF0jLLt3_MtV9.q5UZwG3oQcZ8rxlYAID27 ubG_slbid6KUc4_n1sHf2rLVmnD3lHyuIbxwLWyZkx4b1UH4hjnquSqutEGX c6YtuIsPcUijzk8X2F6sqIyeyxYFUOfVYwsDX5eOj6RVMFowjJHeUVyLeaYC Eoyxr0NI3Ll0sXR_QtHvdKNlbq82mTFoVgi2nhw4jSVkoMnyxSdQT0Kwx19u pxoz065mUnixskXf9iW0wXoqCOoqr.eEHHe_fb3uSD6MENOry5fKYluE8Hw5 QCXs4IMVBQtWmK6Ke47_uqrCQM56IDPmK4ywTeD_ABsR.MhqJY0iOKg4ZcWw djj95m2U4tv8H1lck_bNsh7aStpflKrsYfxte.EyZXTqL_HgQIUjYHb.5EY9 iwMA9sKAbHak- Received: from [76.126.156.12] by web30006.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:48:18 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:48:18 -0800 (PST) From: whorl1quote-re@yahoo.com Reply-To: whorl1quote-re@yahoo.com Subject: fair scheduler on memory usage To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1857806086-1294012098=:25718" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1857806086-1294012098=:25718 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Can fair scheduler set an upper limit on a job's memory consumption? How do I use fair/capacity scheduler to make sure a long running (memory drain) job won't impact the service level of other higher priority jobs? --0-1857806086-1294012098=:25718-- From general-return-2649-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 17:59:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37054 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 17:59:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 17:59:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 13944 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 17:59:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13738 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 17:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17299 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 11:01:43 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294052435; bh=ORylPbyWpN68zLMA6nl0CS76YgXPL1xMNwUfQueWCZI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=ob21XefM9/qZD71CSd1ujr2ad5EDMQwTEu8MQTPPn0YOB2kOkVao0oJHDrM5TPbLu E6gJ+dIQJA0lh01SlAuvoEUU4mZblaoSanbQ2rMMVSF8FOp7YPIKfcmVWNkQnmlqSZ PMUFFFTOQxN7A/faYQ7ZazGgJmt2i2y/cgOYlW2U= Message-ID: <4D21AC48.2060200@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:30:24 +0530 From: Basant Verma Reply-To: yahoohadoop@yahoo-inc.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop India Summit 2011 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050608010503050709020404" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------050608010503050709020404 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020100060701060208070900" --------------020100060701060208070900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hadoop enthusiasts, Apache Hadoop has become the de-facto platform for developing large-scale data-intensive applications. It has been used actively in academia and Industry for research and data mining. Hadoop Summit provides an opportunity for understanding the latest trends and roadmap for Hadoop Platform and its ecosystem and how Hadoop is leveraged in various domains. Yahoo! India R&D is proud to host second India Hadoop Summit which will take place in Bangalore, India on February 16th or 17th, 2011. Please look at the attached information if you'd like to present in the summit. Stay tuned for summit registration info which we will publish in early January. Best Regards, Basant Verma Yahoo, Hadoop --------------020100060701060208070900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hadoop enthusiasts,

Apache Hadoop has become the de-facto platform for developing large-scale data-intensive applications. It has been used actively in academia and Industry for research and data mining. Hadoop Summit provides an opportunity for understanding the latest trends and roadmap for Hadoop Platform and its ecosystem and how Hadoop is leveraged in various domains.

Yahoo! India R&D is proud to host second India Hadoop Summit which will take place in Bangalore, India on February 16th or 17th, 2011.

Please look at the attached information if you’d like to present in the summit. Stay tuned for summit registration info which we will publish in early January.

Best Regards,
Basant Verma
Yahoo, Hadoop
--------------020100060701060208070900-- --------------050608010503050709020404-- From general-return-2650-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 20:23:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19755 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 20:22:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 20:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 27611 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:22:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27546 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22665 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 20:21:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of buttler1@llnl.gov designates 128.115.41.83 as permitted sender) X-Attachments: None From: "Buttler, David" To: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" CC: "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:20:53 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acul2gQhGBzjuFTiQL2qQO67SCiwKwA/gmuwASqbeAA= Message-ID: <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ron, Loading into HDFS and HBase are two different issues. =20 HDFS: if you have a large number of files to load from your nfs file system= into HDFS it is not clear that parallelizing the load will help. You have= two sources of bottlenecks: the nfs file system and the HDFS file system. = In your parallel example, you will likely saturate your nfs file system fi= rst. If they are actually local files, then loading them via M/R is a non-= starter as you have no control over which machine will get a map task. Unl= ess all of the machines have files in the same directory and you are just g= oing to look in that directory to upload. Then, it sounds like more of a j= ob for a parallel shell command and less of a map/reduce command. HBase: So far my strategy has been to get the files into HDFS first, and th= en write a Map job to load them into HBase. You can try to do this and see= if direct inserts into hbase are fast enough for your use case. But, if y= ou are going to TBs/week then you will likely want to investigate the bulk = load features. I haven't yet incorporated that into my workflow so I can't= offer much advice there. Just be sure your cluster is sized appropriately.= E.g., with your compression turned on in hbase, see how much a 1 GB input= file expands to inside hbase / hdfs. That should give you a feeling for h= ow much space you will need for your expected data load. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 2:05 PM To: 'user@hbase.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org' Cc: Taylor, Ronald C; Fox, Kevin M; Brown, David M JR Subject: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Had= oop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Folks, We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop= cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the o= rder of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the = uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system in= to HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range.=20 Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Ja= va MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file= listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and = then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program.=20 Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copy= FromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with th= e Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file= upload across the nodes. Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods?= Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would v= ery much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed migh= t become a bottleneck. - Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov From general-return-2651-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 20:44:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28164 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 20:44:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 20:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 51866 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:44:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51754 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:44:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51739 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 20:44:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:44:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:44:16 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,268,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35972043" Received: from emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Jan 2011 12:43:56 -0800 Received: from Email05.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.69]) by emailhub02.pnl.gov ([130.20.251.62]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:43:55 -0800 From: "Taylor, Ronald C" To: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" CC: "Fox, Kevin M" , "Brown, David M JR" , "Taylor, Ronald C" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:43:55 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: Acul2gQhGBzjuFTiQL2qQO67SCiwKwA/gmuwASqbeAAAAIt4AA== Message-ID: References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> In-Reply-To: <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Dave, Thanks for the suggestions. Glad to hear from a fellow DOE national lab per= son!=20 We are just starting to explore all this here at Pacific Northwest Nat Lab,= and what will be going into Hbase and what will be left as files in HDFS i= s an open question, to be empirically determined over the coming year. It w= ill depend on upon what instrument data gets put in, how the users want to = analyze the data, what turns out to be practical for future growth and main= tenance, etc. My lab colleagues Kevin Fox and David Brown have a lot more e= xperience handling massive amount of data - they are already handling hundr= eds of TBs in the archive cluster for EMSL, our national user facility (lot= s of mass spec, NMR, microscopy, and next gen sequencing machines for biolo= gy and chemistry, as you may already know). And they have much better grip = on the hardware and OS side of things. So I imagine you & the list will be = hearing directly from them fairly often as questions arise. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Buttler, David [mailto:buttler1@llnl.gov]=20 Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 12:21 PM To: user@hbase.apache.org; 'general@hadoop.apache.org' Cc: Fox, Kevin M; Brown, David M JR Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the= Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Hi Ron, Loading into HDFS and HBase are two different issues. =20 HDFS: if you have a large number of files to load from your nfs file system= into HDFS it is not clear that parallelizing the load will help. You have= two sources of bottlenecks: the nfs file system and the HDFS file system. = In your parallel example, you will likely saturate your nfs file system fi= rst. If they are actually local files, then loading them via M/R is a non-= starter as you have no control over which machine will get a map task. Unl= ess all of the machines have files in the same directory and you are just g= oing to look in that directory to upload. Then, it sounds like more of a j= ob for a parallel shell command and less of a map/reduce command. HBase: So far my strategy has been to get the files into HDFS first, and th= en write a Map job to load them into HBase. You can try to do this and see= if direct inserts into hbase are fast enough for your use case. But, if y= ou are going to TBs/week then you will likely want to investigate the bulk = load features. I haven't yet incorporated that into my workflow so I can't= offer much advice there. Just be sure your cluster is sized appropriately.= E.g., with your compression turned on in hbase, see how much a 1 GB input= file expands to inside hbase / hdfs. That should give you a feeling for h= ow much space you will need for your expected data load. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 2:05 PM To: 'user@hbase.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org' Cc: Taylor, Ronald C; Fox, Kevin M; Brown, David M JR Subject: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Had= oop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Folks, We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop= cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the o= rder of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the = uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system in= to HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range.=20 Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Ja= va MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file= listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and = then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program.=20 Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copy= FromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with th= e Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file= upload across the nodes. Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods?= Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would v= ery much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed migh= t become a bottleneck. - Ron Taylor ___________________________________________ Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 Richland, WA 99352 USA Office: 509-372-6568 Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov From general-return-2652-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 21:46:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55372 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 21:46:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 21:46:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 38282 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 21:46:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38043 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 21:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12771 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 21:38:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" , "user@oodt.apache.org" , "general@incubator.apache.org" , "dev@tika.apache.org" , "user@tika.apache.org" , "whirr-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "gora-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "sis-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:38:24 -0800 Subject: [Call for Papers] ICSE Software Engineering for Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop Thread-Topic: [Call for Papers] ICSE Software Engineering for Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop Thread-Index: Acurjo0U1eus/GuLQlSXr8nNmcFIBw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org (apologies for the cross posting) Please consider submitting a paper to the ICSE 2011 Software Engineering fo= r Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop to be held Sunday, May 22, 2011, at th= e Hilton Hawaiian Village Resort in Waikiki, Honolulu, HI. This workshop focuses on identifying the grand challenges that lay before u= s in the realm of software engineering for cloud computing. We will debate = existing notions of SE for the construction of cloud services and for their= deployment. We will discuss and evangelize individual successes in the fie= ld and attempt to identify the key ingredients that enabled that success. P= articipants in this workshop will take a role in helping to formulate a lon= g-term, concrete software engineering agenda for cloud and will have an opp= ortunity to share in and contribute to the existing =93tribal knowledge=94 = for cloud-related software engineering. We invite high quality submissions of technical and research papers, as wel= l as research demonstrations describing original and unpublished results of= research relevant to software engineering for cloud. Authors are asked to = reserve a section in their submitted papers for identifying their suggested= near-term and long-term challenge areas for the field. The workshop seeks to focus discussion around the ways that the disruptive = effect of cloud computing is engendering a new set of principles and approa= ches to software engineering. Specific topics of interest include, but are = not limited to: Topic Areas of Interest: - Agile Software development on the cloud - Architecting Applications using the cloud - Benchmarking and Performance Metrics in the cloud - Cloud Application Reliability - Distributed collaboration on the cloud - Interoperability and Portability challenges in multi-cloud environments - Open Source Cloud Environments: Hadoop, Eucalyptus and other programming = paradigms, languages and environments for the Cloud - Requirements Elicitation effectiveness when using cloud service abstracti= ons - Secure Software Engineering in the Cloud - Software Engineering Practices using popular cloud vendor services - Software Engineering tools - Software Project Estimations, Testing,Verification and Validation over cl= oud service abstractions Submission Guidelines: Submissions may take one of two acceptable forms. Research paper contributi= ons may be submitted with a maximum length of 7 pages, and must conform to = ICSE 2011 paper formatting guidelines [1]. Research demonstration submissio= ns are limited to 1 page in the conference proceedings and will be given du= ring he two 15-minute breakout sessions. All submissions must be in English and in PDF format [2]. An abstract must = accompany each research paper contribution. The workshop website [3] will b= e updated to include a link to the CyberChairPRO online submission system o= nce it has been set up. All accepted papers will be published and dissemina= ted on the workshop website after the conclusion of the workshop. Review and Evaluation Criteria: Each submission will be reviewed by at least two members of the Program Com= mittee and will be assessed on the basis of originality, importance and rel= evance of contribution to SE for cloud, soundness, quality of presentation,= and an appropriate comparison to related work. The program committee as a = whole will make final decisions about acceptance. Workshop Organizers and PC Chairs: Nenad Medvidovic , University of Southern California T.S. Mohan, Infosys Technologies Chris A. Mattmann, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Owen O=92Malley, Yahoo, Inc. Important Dates: Paper Submission: 21.January.2011 Paper Notification: 21.February.2011 Camera Ready: 10.March.2011 Website: http://sites.google.com/site/icsecloud2011 Program Committee: Andrew F. Hart, NASA JPL, United States Ben Reed, Yahoo, United States Craig Lee, Aerospace Corp., United States Daniel J. Crichton, NASA JPL, United States David C. Kale, Children's Hospital LA, United States David M. Woollard, Project WBS, United States Dennis Kubes, Bit.ly, United States Eric Dashofy, Aerospace Corp., United States Jacek Becla, Stanford National Accelerator Lab, United States Justin Erenkrantz, Project WBS/Apache, United States Luca Cinquini, NASA JPL, United States Mohanakrishna, Infosys, India Nabor Mendonca, Univ. of Fortaleza, Brazil Sanjay Radia, Yahoo, United States Schahram Dustdar, TU Wien, Vienna Srinivas Padmanabhuni, Infosys, India Stefan Tai, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany YN Srikant, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India Links: [1] ICSE-2011 Format: http://2011.icse-conferences.org/content-submission-g= uidelines [2] ACM Submission Policies: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedin= gs-templates [3] Workshop Website: http://sites.google.com/site/icsecloud2011 About ICSE:=20 The International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) is the premier = software engineering conference, providing a forum for researchers, practit= ioners and educators to present and discuss the most recent innovations, tr= ends, experiences and concerns in the field of software engineering. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From general-return-2653-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 22:58:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90561 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 22:58:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 22:58:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 5279 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 22:58:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5001 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 22:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4993 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 22:58:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.101.109.31] (HELO emailgw03.pnl.gov) (192.101.109.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:58:32 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,268,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="35983849" Received: from sledge.emsl.pnl.gov (HELO [130.20.231.68]) ([130.20.231.68]) by emailgw03.pnl.gov with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2011 14:58:09 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? From: Kevin Fox To: "Buttler, David" Cc: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" , "Brown, David M JR" In-Reply-To: <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: <1294095489.5455.195.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 12:20 -0800, Buttler, David wrote: > Hi Ron, > Loading into HDFS and HBase are two different issues. > > HDFS: if you have a large number of files to load from your nfs file system into HDFS it is not clear that parallelizing the load will help. Its not nfs. Its a parallel file system. > You have two sources of bottlenecks: the nfs file system and the HDFS file system. In your parallel example, you will likely saturate your nfs file system first. Unlikely in this case. We're in the unusual position of our archive cluster being faster then our hadoop cluster. > If they are actually local files, then loading them via M/R is a non-starter as you have no control over which machine will get a map task. If the same files are "local" on each node, does it matter? Shouldn't the map jobs all be scheduled in a way as to spread out the load? Thanks, Kevin > Unless all of the machines have files in the same directory and you are just going to look in that directory to upload. Then, it sounds like more of a job for a parallel shell command and less of a map/reduce command. > > HBase: So far my strategy has been to get the files into HDFS first, and then write a Map job to load them into HBase. You can try to do this and see if direct inserts into hbase are fast enough for your use case. But, if you are going to TBs/week then you will likely want to investigate the bulk load features. I haven't yet incorporated that into my workflow so I can't offer much advice there. Just be sure your cluster is sized appropriately. E.g., with your compression turned on in hbase, see how much a 1 GB input file expands to inside hbase / hdfs. That should give you a feeling for how much space you will need for your expected data load. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taylor, Ronald C [mailto:ronald.taylor@pnl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 2:05 PM > To: 'user@hbase.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org' > Cc: Taylor, Ronald C; Fox, Kevin M; Brown, David M JR > Subject: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? > > > Folks, > > We plan on uploading large amounts of data on a regular basis onto a Hadoop cluster, with Hbase operating on top of Hadoop. Figure eventually on the order of multiple terabytes per week. So - we are concerned about doing the uploads themselves as fast as possible from our native Linux file system into HDFS. Figure files will be in, roughly, the 1 to 300 GB range. > > Off the top of my head, I'm thinking that doing this in parallel using a Java MapReduce program would work fastest. So my idea would be to have a file listing all the data files (full paths) to be uploaded, one per line, and then use that listing file as input to a MapReduce program. > > Each Mapper would then upload one of the data files (using "hadoop fs -copyFromLocal ") in parallel with all the other Mappers, with the Mappers operating on all the nodes of the cluster, spreading out the file upload across the nodes. > > Does that sound like a wise way to approach this? Are there better methods? Anything else out there for doing automated upload in parallel? We would very much appreciate advice in this area, since we believe upload speed might become a bottleneck. > > - Ron Taylor > > ___________________________________________ > Ronald Taylor, Ph.D. > Computational Biology & Bioinformatics Group > > Pacific Northwest National Laboratory > 902 Battelle Boulevard > P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop J4-33 > Richland, WA 99352 USA > Office: 509-372-6568 > Email: ronald.taylor@pnl.gov > > From general-return-2654-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 03 23:07:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5552 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 23:07:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 23:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 21162 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 23:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21102 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 23:07:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21094 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 23:07:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:07:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:06:56 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so14389560qyk.14 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.80.77 with SMTP id s13mr18269792qck.242.1294095995019; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:06:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.17 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:06:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "Aaron T. Myers" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:06:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dfs.datanode.du.pct question To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646a53a16a7430498f9343a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646a53a16a7430498f9343a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564 -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > It would be nice to have a feature like this. It will make our data > nodes much more flexible. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Harsh J wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Isn't this property a legacy one? 0.18 is the last release I see with > > this property. I've always used dfs.datanode.du.reserved instead, > > reserving constant space across all dfs.data.dir volumes. > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> On some of my data nodes I have 2 filesystems. /fs1 and /fs2. Is it > >> possible to set the du pct so, for fs1 its 80% usage and /fs2 its 20% > >> usage? > > > > According to the release's code: No. > > > > (Unless two DataNodes are run off the same machine, which is not > recommended.) > > > > -- > > Harsh J > > www.harshj.com > > > --0016e646a53a16a7430498f9343a-- From general-return-2655-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 04 01:06:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66293 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2011 01:06:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 01:06:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 52669 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 01:06:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52599 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 01:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52591 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2011 01:06:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:06:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of buttler1@llnl.gov designates 128.115.41.82 as permitted sender) Received: from [128.115.41.82] (HELO nspiron-2.llnl.gov) (128.115.41.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:06:17 +0000 X-Attachments: None Received: from nspexhub-2.llnl.gov (HELO nspexhub-2.the-lab.llnl.gov) ([128.115.54.114]) by nspiron-2.llnl.gov with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2011 17:05:55 -0800 Received: from NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov ([128.115.54.105]) by nspexhub-2.the-lab.llnl.gov ([172.16.54.114]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:05:55 -0800 From: "Buttler, David" To: Kevin Fox CC: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "'general@hadoop.apache.org'" , "Brown, David M JR" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:05:54 -0800 Subject: RE: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Topic: What is the fastest way to get a large amount of data into the Hadoop HDFS file system (or Hbase)? Thread-Index: AcurmbIMPrJ07f2rTE2CM3g4zhkKfAAEQG/w Message-ID: <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BF12C@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> References: <590321.36008.qm@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <536061.77419.qm@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D18AF52.9080800@mozilla.com> <2D6136772A13B84E95DF6DA79E85A9F00134476BEFDC@NSPEXMBX-A.the-lab.llnl.gov> <1294095489.5455.195.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> In-Reply-To: <1294095489.5455.195.camel@sledge.emsl.pnl.gov> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org UmlnaHQsIEkgc2hvdWxkIGhhdmUgcmVhbGl6ZWQgdGhhdCB5b3UgZ3V5cyB3b3VsZCBiZSB1c2lu ZyBhIGdvb2QgcGFyYWxsZWwgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0uICBJbiB0aGF0IGNhc2UgYSBNL1Igam9iIHdp bGwgYmUgZ3JlYXQgZm9yIG1vdmluZyB0aGUgZGF0YSAtLSBhcyBsb25nIGFzIHlvdSBkb24ndCBv dmVybG9hZCB0aGUgbmV0d29yay4gIEFuZCBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGdvaW5nIHRvIGhhdmUgdGhlIGRh dGEgZW5kIHVwIGluIEhCYXNlIHlvdSBtYXkganVzdCB3cml0ZSBhIG1hcCBqb2IgdG8gZGlyZWN0 bHkgaW5zZXJ0IGludG8gaGJhc2UsIGVpdGhlciB0aHJvdWdoIHN0YW5kYXJkIGluc2VydHMgb3Ig YnVsayBsb2FkcyAod2hpY2ggc2hvdWxkIGJlIDEweCBmYXN0ZXIpLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSB0 aW1lIHRvIHBsYXksIGl0IG1pZ2h0IGJlIGludGVyZXN0aW5nIHRvIHNlZSBob3cgaGJhc2UgcnVu cyBvdmVyIHlvdXIgY3VycmVudCBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbS4gIEp1c3QgdXNlIHRoZSBmaWxlOi8vPHBh dGggdG8gc2hhcmVkIGRpcmVjdG9yeT4gaW5zdGVhZCBvZiB0aGUgaGRmczovLyB1cmwgaW4gdGhl IGhiYXNlLXNpdGUueG1sIGZpbGUuICBJIHdvdWxkIHN0cmVzcyB0ZXN0IHRoYXQgZmlyc3Qgd2l0 aCBib3RoIGhiYXNlIGFuZCBtL3Igam9icyBqdXN0IHRvIG1ha2Ugc3VyZSB0aGF0IGl0IGJlaGF2 ZXMgd2VsbCwgYnV0IHRoZXJlIHdvdWxkIGJlIG1hbnkgcGVvcGxlIHdobyB3b3VsZCBsb3ZlIHRv IGhlYXIgYWJvdXQgeW91ciBleHBlcmllbmNlIGhlcmUuICBJIGZvciBvbmUgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0 byBrbm93IGlmIEkgY2FuIHJ1biBoYmFzZSBvdmVyIGx1c3RlciBzaW5jZSB3ZSBsb3ZlIGx1c3Rl ciBhcm91bmQgaGVyZS4NCg0KRGF2ZQ0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJv bTogS2V2aW4gRm94IFttYWlsdG86S2V2aW4uRm94QHBubC5nb3ZdIA0KU2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBK YW51YXJ5IDAzLCAyMDExIDI6NTggUE0NClRvOiBCdXR0bGVyLCBEYXZpZA0KQ2M6IHVzZXJAaGJh c2UuYXBhY2hlLm9yZzsgJ2dlbmVyYWxAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcnOyBCcm93biwgRGF2aWQg TSBKUg0KU3ViamVjdDogUkU6IFdoYXQgaXMgdGhlIGZhc3Rlc3Qgd2F5IHRvIGdldCBhIGxhcmdl IGFtb3VudCBvZiBkYXRhIGludG8gdGhlIEhhZG9vcCBIREZTIGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIChvciBIYmFz ZSk/DQoNCk9uIE1vbiwgMjAxMS0wMS0wMyBhdCAxMjoyMCAtMDgwMCwgQnV0dGxlciwgRGF2aWQg d3JvdGU6DQo+IEhpIFJvbiwNCj4gTG9hZGluZyBpbnRvIEhERlMgYW5kIEhCYXNlIGFyZSB0d28g ZGlmZmVyZW50IGlzc3Vlcy4gIA0KPiANCj4gSERGUzogaWYgeW91IGhhdmUgYSBsYXJnZSBudW1i ZXIgb2YgZmlsZXMgdG8gbG9hZCBmcm9tIHlvdXIgbmZzIGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtIGludG8gSERGUyBp dCBpcyBub3QgY2xlYXIgdGhhdCBwYXJhbGxlbGl6aW5nIHRoZSBsb2FkIHdpbGwgaGVscC4gDQoN Ckl0cyBub3QgbmZzLiBJdHMgYSBwYXJhbGxlbCBmaWxlIHN5c3RlbS4NCg0KPiAgWW91IGhhdmUg dHdvIHNvdXJjZXMgb2YgYm90dGxlbmVja3M6IHRoZSBuZnMgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0gYW5kIHRoZSBI REZTIGZpbGUgc3lzdGVtLiAgSW4geW91ciBwYXJhbGxlbCBleGFtcGxlLCB5b3Ugd2lsbCBsaWtl bHkgc2F0dXJhdGUgeW91ciBuZnMgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0gZmlyc3QuDQoNClVubGlrZWx5IGluIHRo aXMgY2FzZS4gV2UncmUgaW4gdGhlIHVudXN1YWwgcG9zaXRpb24gb2Ygb3VyIGFyY2hpdmUNCmNs dXN0ZXIgYmVpbmcgZmFzdGVyIHRoZW4gb3VyIGhhZG9vcCBjbHVzdGVyLg0KDQo+ICAgSWYgdGhl eSBhcmUgYWN0dWFsbHkgbG9jYWwgZmlsZXMsIHRoZW4gbG9hZGluZyB0aGVtIHZpYSBNL1IgaXMg YSBub24tc3RhcnRlciBhcyB5b3UgaGF2ZSBubyBjb250cm9sIG92ZXIgd2hpY2ggbWFjaGluZSB3 aWxsIGdldCBhIG1hcCB0YXNrLg0KDQpJZiB0aGUgc2FtZSBmaWxlcyBhcmUgImxvY2FsIiBvbiBl YWNoIG5vZGUsIGRvZXMgaXQgbWF0dGVyPyBTaG91bGRuJ3QNCnRoZSBtYXAgam9icyBhbGwgYmUg c2NoZWR1bGVkIGluIGEgd2F5IGFzIHRvIHNwcmVhZCBvdXQgdGhlIGxvYWQ/DQoNClRoYW5rcywN CktldmluDQoNCj4gICBVbmxlc3MgYWxsIG9mIHRoZSBtYWNoaW5lcyBoYXZlIGZpbGVzIGluIHRo ZSBzYW1lIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBhbmQgeW91IGFyZSBqdXN0IGdvaW5nIHRvIGxvb2sgaW4gdGhhdCBk aXJlY3RvcnkgdG8gdXBsb2FkLiAgVGhlbiwgaXQgc291bmRzIGxpa2UgbW9yZSBvZiBhIGpvYiBm b3IgYSBwYXJhbGxlbCBzaGVsbCBjb21tYW5kIGFuZCBsZXNzIG9mIGEgbWFwL3JlZHVjZSBjb21t YW5kLg0KPiANCj4gSEJhc2U6IFNvIGZhciBteSBzdHJhdGVneSBoYXMgYmVlbiB0byBnZXQgdGhl IGZpbGVzIGludG8gSERGUyBmaXJzdCwgYW5kIHRoZW4gd3JpdGUgYSBNYXAgam9iIHRvIGxvYWQg dGhlbSBpbnRvIEhCYXNlLiAgWW91IGNhbiB0cnkgdG8gZG8gdGhpcyBhbmQgc2VlIGlmIGRpcmVj dCBpbnNlcnRzIGludG8gaGJhc2UgYXJlIGZhc3QgZW5vdWdoIGZvciB5b3VyIHVzZSBjYXNlLiAg QnV0LCBpZiB5b3UgYXJlIGdvaW5nIHRvIFRCcy93ZWVrIHRoZW4geW91IHdpbGwgbGlrZWx5IHdh bnQgdG8gaW52ZXN0aWdhdGUgdGhlIGJ1bGsgbG9hZCBmZWF0dXJlcy4gIEkgaGF2ZW4ndCB5ZXQg aW5jb3Jwb3JhdGVkIHRoYXQgaW50byBteSB3b3JrZmxvdyBzbyBJIGNhbid0IG9mZmVyIG11Y2gg YWR2aWNlIHRoZXJlLiBKdXN0IGJlIHN1cmUgeW91ciBjbHVzdGVyIGlzIHNpemVkIGFwcHJvcHJp YXRlbHkuICBFLmcuLCB3aXRoIHlvdXIgY29tcHJlc3Npb24gdHVybmVkIG9uIGluIGhiYXNlLCBz ZWUgaG93IG11Y2ggYSAxIEdCIGlucHV0IGZpbGUgZXhwYW5kcyB0byBpbnNpZGUgaGJhc2UgLyBo ZGZzLiAgVGhhdCBzaG91bGQgZ2l2ZSB5b3UgYSBmZWVsaW5nIGZvciBob3cgbXVjaCBzcGFjZSB5 b3Ugd2lsbCBuZWVkIGZvciB5b3VyIGV4cGVjdGVkIGRhdGEgbG9hZC4NCj4gDQo+IERhdmUNCj4g DQo+IA0KPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBUYXlsb3IsIFJvbmFs ZCBDIFttYWlsdG86cm9uYWxkLnRheWxvckBwbmwuZ292XSANCj4gU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgRGVj ZW1iZXIgMjgsIDIwMTAgMjowNSBQTQ0KPiBUbzogJ3VzZXJAaGJhc2UuYXBhY2hlLm9yZyc7ICdn ZW5lcmFsQGhhZG9vcC5hcGFjaGUub3JnJw0KPiBDYzogVGF5bG9yLCBSb25hbGQgQzsgRm94LCBL ZXZpbiBNOyBCcm93biwgRGF2aWQgTSBKUg0KPiBTdWJqZWN0OiBXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBmYXN0ZXN0 IHdheSB0byBnZXQgYSBsYXJnZSBhbW91bnQgb2YgZGF0YSBpbnRvIHRoZSBIYWRvb3AgSERGUyBm aWxlIHN5c3RlbSAob3IgSGJhc2UpPw0KPiANCj4gDQo+IEZvbGtzLA0KPiANCj4gV2UgcGxhbiBv biB1cGxvYWRpbmcgbGFyZ2UgYW1vdW50cyBvZiBkYXRhIG9uIGEgcmVndWxhciBiYXNpcyBvbnRv IGEgSGFkb29wIGNsdXN0ZXIsIHdpdGggSGJhc2Ugb3BlcmF0aW5nIG9uIHRvcCBvZiBIYWRvb3Au IEZpZ3VyZSBldmVudHVhbGx5IG9uIHRoZSBvcmRlciBvZiBtdWx0aXBsZSB0ZXJhYnl0ZXMgcGVy IHdlZWsuIFNvIC0gd2UgYXJlIGNvbmNlcm5lZCBhYm91dCBkb2luZyB0aGUgdXBsb2FkcyB0aGVt c2VsdmVzIGFzIGZhc3QgYXMgcG9zc2libGUgZnJvbSBvdXIgbmF0aXZlIExpbnV4IGZpbGUgc3lz dGVtIGludG8gSERGUy4gRmlndXJlIGZpbGVzIHdpbGwgYmUgaW4sIHJvdWdobHksIHRoZSAxIHRv IDMwMCBHQiByYW5nZS4gDQo+IA0KPiBPZmYgdGhlIHRvcCBvZiBteSBoZWFkLCBJJ20gdGhpbmtp bmcgdGhhdCBkb2luZyB0aGlzIGluIHBhcmFsbGVsIHVzaW5nIGEgSmF2YSBNYXBSZWR1Y2UgcHJv Z3JhbSB3b3VsZCB3b3JrIGZhc3Rlc3QuIFNvIG15IGlkZWEgd291bGQgYmUgdG8gaGF2ZSBhIGZp bGUgbGlzdGluZyBhbGwgdGhlIGRhdGEgZmlsZXMgKGZ1bGwgcGF0aHMpIHRvIGJlIHVwbG9hZGVk LCBvbmUgcGVyIGxpbmUsIGFuZCB0aGVuIHVzZSB0aGF0IGxpc3RpbmcgZmlsZSBhcyBpbnB1dCB0 byBhIE1hcFJlZHVjZSBwcm9ncmFtLiANCj4gDQo+IEVhY2ggTWFwcGVyIHdvdWxkIHRoZW4gdXBs b2FkIG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgZGF0YSBmaWxlcyAodXNpbmcgImhhZG9vcCBmcyAtY29weUZyb21Mb2Nh bCA8c291cmNlPiA8ZGVzdD4iKSBpbiBwYXJhbGxlbCB3aXRoIGFsbCB0aGUgb3RoZXIgTWFwcGVy cywgd2l0aCB0aGUgTWFwcGVycyBvcGVyYXRpbmcgb24gYWxsIHRoZSBub2RlcyBvZiB0aGUgY2x1 c3Rlciwgc3ByZWFkaW5nIG91dCB0aGUgZmlsZSB1cGxvYWQgYWNyb3NzIHRoZSBub2Rlcy4NCj4g DQo+IERvZXMgdGhhdCBzb3VuZCBsaWtlIGEgd2lzZSB3YXkgdG8gYXBwcm9hY2ggdGhpcz8gQXJl IHRoZXJlIGJldHRlciBtZXRob2RzPyBBbnl0aGluZyBlbHNlIG91dCB0aGVyZSBmb3IgZG9pbmcg YXV0b21hdGVkIHVwbG9hZCBpbiBwYXJhbGxlbD8gV2Ugd291bGQgdmVyeSBtdWNoIGFwcHJlY2lh dGUgYWR2aWNlIGluIHRoaXMgYXJlYSwgc2luY2Ugd2UgYmVsaWV2ZSB1cGxvYWQgc3BlZWQgbWln aHQgYmVjb21lIGEgYm90dGxlbmVjay4NCj4gDQo+ICAgLSBSb24gVGF5bG9yDQo+IA0KPiBfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+IFJvbmFsZCBUYXlsb3Is IFBoLkQuDQo+IENvbXB1dGF0aW9uYWwgQmlvbG9neSAmIEJpb2luZm9ybWF0aWNzIEdyb3VwDQo+ IA0KPiBQYWNpZmljIE5vcnRod2VzdCBOYXRpb25hbCBMYWJvcmF0b3J5DQo+IDkwMiBCYXR0ZWxs ZSBCb3VsZXZhcmQNCj4gUC5PLiBCb3ggOTk5LCBNYWlsIFN0b3AgSjQtMzMNCj4gUmljaGxhbmQs IFdBICA5OTM1MiBVU0ENCj4gT2ZmaWNlOiAgNTA5LTM3Mi02NTY4DQo+IEVtYWlsOiByb25hbGQu dGF5bG9yQHBubC5nb3YNCj4gDQo+IA0KDQoNCg== From general-return-2656-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 04 02:58:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95540 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2011 02:58:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 02:58:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 23230 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 02:57:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22587 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 02:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22527 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2011 02:57:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:57:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 02:57:48 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (vpn-client-104-6.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.104.6]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p042ukO6043438; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:56:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294109817; bh=Rqqop5Pu1Qbk0Uds3Ol///eO+Gi35+134xgxQ5skhxw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=CZGaaC2e/cw8jtH5edOcEq2qwHVSCuI5yYB9vjCaEy7YrubIMYzTkbOCRdN9NYoZv eeGi9A2XgIwqtqeUU8r5bTuCjU3+fsKa03QMnEdwMG+6gjrqqd+SgxKR3i6Gi67CnV SmFq6Ih3uQP49iHb5DM3j32E+vB6Gzxgf2hcDD7g= Message-ID: <4D228C6D.5000507@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:26:45 +0530 From: Basant Verma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@pig.apache.org, user@hive.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop India Summit 2011 - Call for Papers now Open Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030706090007090900010202" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------030706090007090900010202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hadoop enthusiasts, Apache Hadoop has become the de-facto platform for developing large-scale data-intensive applications. It has been used actively in academia and Industry for research and data mining. Hadoop Summit provides an opportunity for understanding the latest trends and roadmap for Hadoop Platform and its ecosystem and how Hadoop is leveraged in various domains. Yahoo! India R&D is proud to host second India Hadoop Summit which will take place in Bangalore, India on February 16th or 17th, 2011. Please look at http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2011/01/hadoop-india-summit-2011-call-for-papers/ for more information information if you'd like to present in the summit. Stay tuned for summit registration info which we will publish in early January. Best Regards, Basant Verma Yahoo India R&D, Hadoop --------------030706090007090900010202-- From general-return-2657-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 04 22:49:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2011 22:49:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 22:49:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 51920 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 22:49:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51711 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 22:49:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59203 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2011 22:11:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of iphulari@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vNLwlS/41FzgFx7cHR7lH5C5VeAPlscc4jGPhcvefhE=; b=F4wi74maiJVi/qgvXW1P1jThgsC999RlLUSQeno+NVh15b3TfQqgAjKod90zXH2Qzl QJZbaUYPiC1YbeQqz107Z739/V4cpquK5WiVfB2bkkUyyHdKEh1jMJ/aD3/D6Yx0BgVb xb3eQs/RFJu/250/m5YbBF/RGpxcGXbG3k6a0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mSpACDvcOE+62faBCJQ/lPoV9VckqGN1XdRdUusp2wELYicnnH8Lac2KSJ8aYy13sV FdK8dggP+pycAF1ntcOSB1mWf5Yz5x+VimU1DFOv75weIqIN2mfemf3OSGsXF1AwUpqY cNRbgGMuhi0wwqG2bRq0+amSEyX9AODZ5QRig= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:10:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: HFTP based distcp failing. From: Ravi Phulari To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367be957e6575804990c8ac8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367be957e6575804990c8ac8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Hadoopers, I need to distcp data across two clusters. For security reasons I can not use hdfs based distcp. HFTP based distcp is failing with following Ioexception. Stack trace. Copy failed: java.io.IOException: Not supported at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.HftpFileSystem.delete(HftpFileSystem.java:360= ) at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.fullyDelete(DistCp.java:939) at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.copy(DistCp.java:655) at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.run(DistCp.java:857) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.main(DistCp.java:884) I am using following command for distcp. Hadoop distcp hftp://nn1.hadoop1:50070/data hftp://nn2.hadoop2:50070/user/hadoop/ Hadoop distcp /data/logs hftp://nn2.hadoop2:50070/user/hadoop/ Any idea why this distcp could be failing. I don=92t see any logs in JT and NN. Any help will be greatly appreciated. - Thanks, Ravi --0016367be957e6575804990c8ac8-- From general-return-2658-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 04 22:57:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31872 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2011 22:57:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2011 22:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 68783 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 22:57:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68574 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2011 22:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68559 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2011 22:57:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:57:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:57:44 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so6222735eyz.35 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5v/yT/d8HgWRRNvpN7kgZFG4Lj3C4zI3Lc+5WW1tkg0=; b=fn4zdla/ekDdQLvFdZgmJaKxVGE/tPMh317AHuZ+c2kw0PB3n0wi1a+rPFSoNlkigk 7qVnOA4r9o3PUXU0dIOt1qgZsex5oN4zd1mr7cFLrvfOswGGDaDODEugtyjX7sSukBM8 B/FVzA+QQ0Nf92bU+OO4dSReqdyfmV4dQSPPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GhdBbcpuKUnjKESNkh4xRpcfD7TdUm+P4+RIJB5GfhKyse1s6b1RKIkb3QP1ji8G7Z aZxLuIZOz/3WFx1XrqnF533oq89Xvu8Oflfsb5ajMsq97OOJsaMPMiLzo+LJJ3ED5DZP 35qgkFhS2plTDxmB2DE1TpAykN5LBCJG98Ot0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.69 with SMTP id g5mr15144764ebg.70.1294181844111; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.35.140 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:57:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:57:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HFTP based distcp failing. From: Lars George To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org, user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ravi, With distcp you usually run it on the target cluster and specify the source with the "hftp://" URI and the target with "hdfs://". hftp is a read only, http based access to the data. Lars On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ravi Phulari wrote: > Hello Hadoopers, > =A0I need to distcp data across two clusters. For security reasons I can = not > use hdfs based distcp. > HFTP based distcp is failing =A0with following Ioexception. > > Stack trace. > > Copy failed: java.io.IOException: Not supported > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.HftpFileSystem.delete(HftpFileSystem.jav= a:360) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.fullyDelete(DistCp.java:939) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.copy(DistCp.java:655) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.run(DistCp.java:857) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) > =A0 =A0at org.apache.hadoop.tools.DistCp.main(DistCp.java:884) > > I am using following command for distcp. > > Hadoop distcp =A0hftp://nn1.hadoop1:50070/data > hftp://nn2.hadoop2:50070/user/hadoop/ > Hadoop distcp =A0/data/logs =A0 =A0hftp://nn2.hadoop2:50070/user/hadoop/ > > Any idea why this distcp could be failing. > I don=92t see any logs in JT and NN. > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > - > Thanks, > Ravi > From general-return-2659-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 04:12:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64016 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 04:12:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 04:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 51579 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 04:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51272 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 04:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51264 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 04:12:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 04:12:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of venkatesh.kowluru@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 04:12:16 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so15851369wye.35 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:11:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ac5eOt+qcu4kqTsoAR/gYKlU9car4r5grFnTKmf0tDY=; b=V4KFhGz+M7/P7vf7Jxk0hoZj91VK4eSviouH95wtAQT9Vtjz2N2HZtIQYGqo69yBtj +Xwtgk3KdzW/qG+fsF8IDKIqhKuIc91c2ubsri18J+9LwueJHL7ko64n7peiGoI9VBEm bZXglegj8rYjZxtpns9cimaKSuUd8SVWXRySA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KPicMdnkAzyeZ6VGSB3PRQJ1d+zMAwwVB+XJfRoue4C+K07VVgVOBgK+Z0i1YTV5ba blpxXEF56i93dRMhjmDbrkrXGu3AeVDhtLLvS30btuz6+tPnKoYVLxHh9VcVxFY4G7OI 1nSrncBXHSJX+mES5NvWJ2oBGOF6lGTUt/y70= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.98.94 with SMTP id p30mr4634444wbn.152.1294200716188; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.151.129 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:11:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1294200654.50927.ezmlm@hadoop.apache.org> References: <1294200654.50927.ezmlm@hadoop.apache.org> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:11:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Already subscribed to general@hadoop.apache.org From: venkatesh kavuluri To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd30782f4dddf04991195bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd30782f4dddf04991195bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, I am trying to override the TextOutputFormat class default key-value separator ("\t") with a control character using the configuration parameter below. conf.set("mapred.textoutputformat.separator", "\u0008"); and also like conf.set("mapred.textoutputformat.separator", "\b"); I get the error below, [Fatal Error] :40:68: Character reference "" is an invalid XML character. 10/12/22 14:39:13 FATAL conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Character reference "" is an invalid XML character. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Character reference "" is an invalid XML character. at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1168) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1040) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getProps(Configuration.java:980) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.get(Configuration.java:382) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.checkAndWarnDeprecation(JobConf.java:1662) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.(JobConf.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.(LocalJobRunner.java:93) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner.submitJob(LocalJobRunner.java:373) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:800) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.submit(Job.java:432) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Job.waitForCompletion(Job.java:447) at com.ebay.ewa2.aggregation.BotVisits.run(BotVisits.java:181) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at com.ebay.ewa2.aggregation.BotVisits.main(BotVisits.java:185) Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Character reference "" is an invalid XML character. at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(Unknown Source) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1092) ... 14 more Looks like the jobConf object is not being deserialized properly. Is there any work around without needing to override the TextOutputFormat's RecordWriter method. I am using Hadoop 0.20.2 API. Thanks, Venkatesh --000e0cd30782f4dddf04991195bd-- From general-return-2660-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 06:37:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35842 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 06:37:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 06:37:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 56087 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 06:37:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55747 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 06:37:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55733 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 06:37:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 06:37:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 06:37:28 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so14455789fxm.35 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:37:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+lpsTd2Z8O7uHOq/+m6C8YLu0Xtf5Pwg/H9xPfqlkyo=; b=qgDyCqvUPeczRbmUYKulJf5WDYZEpzuCD0hiyhWLgwaM+zEs742nvaf4rSZ6b6Hbkv pyvFYulsqWU84E+Qy8TpHl11lalFrYU6aTdMVTfFVrU4mh0+imiEPZT+ktlBRjXTnsCP SGdrtOBIHKh6CK065VExPgssavEkRPEQIJXKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=VjhJAgzMsqmKNJWVQTGq8bfuHwLhwvOqjxgRngGS13Uf8yCT/Se08Ck+HynnK2hhA3 xySp3Pnp7d+ql4JxvxAsIZxxwrMY7z/8Sz37GYECHVm4J8mO6qwYRsGZOL8WxPu/Fs7l YNUSabQ53sDFpk0C8F8d9orSrEtsq85jFnv98= Received: by 10.223.124.129 with SMTP id u1mr494636far.112.1294209428439; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:37:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:36:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1294200654.50927.ezmlm@hadoop.apache.org> From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:06:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Already subscribed to general@hadoop.apache.org To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't think the XML spec (the serialized configuration for a Job, is in XML) accepts a backspace character. You should add an escaped version of it instead. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#charsets -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2661-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 11:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96727 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 11:56:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 11:56:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 96328 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 11:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96077 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 11:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96069 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 11:56:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:56:15 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so16155817qwh.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 03:55:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OBatY5gAcDgAMiQmKCfwTd8AYLr4lWmc2ZAX8CfueoA=; b=c0f1ctiJVYcYyUkHHrt6MQWQwJwyGCrRJKk59LvYiV70nPq/lBQw1ZY7KM5YcFZBUm 77RdowIiKpBsOjWGuH8jSi0v3kgUJe51I+3GnHlk+0DdiQ2AwmsyAyJTXzjGVTLE2ghD rA75Jj0yOPKyzalRIetJvlXBU3UhELF/vB/DQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gS2wOy6u8c0s1/lVHTEh0VfFFXDGFlzIGgk18zZbDFLX/iG4d/hsC3T1Zxjhee6OOe QsKPXcWB79IsUnIbjEl6bMjgesLoGe+tPrWF8rK08PQ7EZ2Z32dfg1kp8tid4i6s3K2A MR29aCK3vsEeUH8w3OeZdXdoAE55pII/W6KCk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.219.136 with SMTP id hu8mr8044278qcb.249.1294228554252; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 03:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 03:55:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 06:55:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: decommission a rack From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Using 0.21 I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? From general-return-2662-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 15:02:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84388 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 15:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 15:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 43126 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 15:02:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42930 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 15:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42918 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 15:02:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:02:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 65.167.11.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.167.11.240] (HELO xmailchi.navteq.com) (65.167.11.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:02:10 +0000 Received: from chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (imailchi [10.8.5.161]) by xmailchi.navteq.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p05EVsbS021294 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:31:54 -0600 Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C6883432DA74 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:01:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailchi.hq.navteq.com (imailchi.hq.navteq.com [10.8.120.104]) by chicago-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id wOhlRRpdCNEWzi5s for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:01:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com (hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com [10.8.222.51]) by imailchi.hq.navteq.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p05F1mtf005405 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:01:48 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:01:48 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:01:47 -0600 Subject: RE: decommission a rack Thread-Topic: decommission a rack Thread-Index: Acusz5Q8xTAoxjaMRzWQNq+Rh/T30AAGGEfQ Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Change your topology script? One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced configuration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch are 'fat' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (assuming it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottle neck. (We use Ganglia) If you're seeing the rack count wrong, you could just bounce the cloud and it should show only two. Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to consider just killing the node, waiting till the cluster recognizes that its down and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balancer program will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:56 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: decommission a rack Using 0.21 I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2663-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 22:46:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25907 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 22:46:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 22:46:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 36553 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 22:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36488 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 22:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36480 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 22:46:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:46:08 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so17071602iyb.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:45:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.59.149 with SMTP id l21mr23489582ibh.196.1294267547346; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:45:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:45:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 14:45:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ebea386769b4049921253d --001485ebea386769b4049921253d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Nigel, MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other particular JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the test-patch turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. Thanks -Todd On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on the ~30 > Patch Available HDFS issues. > > Nige > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > > I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can > > haz snooty robot butler? > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > >> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, > >> unless it is done earlier. > >> -- > >> Take care, > >> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to > >>> whip one up tonight. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll > enable hdfs patch testing. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Nige > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone4 > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on > HDFS is > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Take care, > >>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > >>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be > >>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a > comment > >>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but > messier > >>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan > wrote: > >>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > >>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > >>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 > >>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running > >>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so > that > >>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < > dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan > wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the > >>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are > all > >>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for > HDFS > >>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from > entering > >>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> jg > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < > jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need > to be > >>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson > could list > >>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's > still > >>>>>>>>> quite > >>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests > and > >>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot > of > >>>>>>>>> patches > >>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple > patches. The > >>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will > decrease > >>>>>>>>> errors > >>>>>>>>>> we may make. > >>>>>>>>>> -jg > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't > turn it on > >>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both > these > >>>>>>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a > reason to > >>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable > to > >>>>>>>>> developers > >>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch > themselves. We > >>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were > known > >>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing > tests now is > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I > know). This > >>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests > involve > >>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. > Currently, > >>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues > that are in > >>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these > tests fixed > >>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to > HDFS as > >>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485ebea386769b4049921253d-- From general-return-2664-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 05 23:59:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57028 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 23:59:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2011 23:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 30751 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 23:59:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30492 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2011 23:59:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30476 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2011 23:59:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:59:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:59:16 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so6268172vws.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:58:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.191.2 with SMTP id dk2mr208774vcb.251.1294271934165; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:58:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.5.187] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14sm5123889vcx.23.2011.01.05.15.58.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:58:52 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r1055684 - /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.txt Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <20110105231249.66E8023889E0@eris.apache.org> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:58:46 +1100 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20110105231249.66E8023889E0@eris.apache.org> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is 20.3 a 'dead' release ? I haven't seen any discussion of this on the apache lists about creating = a 20.3 release, and kind of goes against all the discussion that we = recently had with StAck about creating a 'append' release on 0.20. I'm not against 20.3, but I would like to see some discussion and not = have things reverted out of it without discussion. On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:12 AM, omalley@apache.org wrote: > Author: omalley > Date: Wed Jan 5 23:12:49 2011 > New Revision: 1055684 >=20 > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D1055684&view=3Drev > Log: > HADOOP-1734. Move to release 0.20.4 since I already made the tag = 0.20.3. >=20 > Modified: > hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.txt >=20 > Modified: hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.txt > URL: = http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.tx= t?rev=3D1055684&r1=3D1055683&r2=3D1055684&view=3Ddiff > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D > --- hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.txt (original) > +++ hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/CHANGES.txt Wed Jan 5 23:12:49 = 2011 > @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased >=20 > IMPROVEMENTS >=20 > + MAPREDUCE-1734. Un-deprecate the old MapReduce API in the 0.20 = branch. > + (todd) > + > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 >=20 > NEW FEATURES > @@ -89,9 +92,6 @@ Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 >=20 > MAPREDUCE-1832. Allow file sizes less than 1MB in DFSIO benchmark. = (shv) >=20 > - MAPREDUCE-1734. Un-deprecate the old MapReduce API in the 0.20 = branch. > - (todd) > - > Release 0.20.2 - 2010-2-19 >=20 > NEW FEATURES >=20 >=20 From general-return-2665-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 00:13:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67894 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:13:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 00:13:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 40909 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:13:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40846 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:13:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40838 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 00:13:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:13:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:13:39 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEK003J0R9HCV10@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:12:54 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-05_12:2011-01-06,2011-01-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101050128 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Hadoop 0.22 Release Preparation Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:12:53 -0800 Message-id: <741040A1-C034-4BF9-9522-5C4E377EE6CC@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks, Happy New Year! As Hadoop 0.22 release manager I'd like to start moving towards a release. There are 2 main lists of issues that I'd like to review with folks. I propose doing this on the Hadoop IRC channel, reviewing issues one-on-one with issue assignee (or reporter if no assignee) at a designated time. Of course anyone else is free to chime in during the IRC discussion. Decisions and rationale will be recorded on the respective Jiras. The 2 lists are: 1) All COMMON, HDFS, and MAPREDUCE issues that are currently marked BLOCKER against any release: http://tinyurl.com/2a4sh6s The goal is to correctly set FIX VERSION on these issues and try to assign most of these issues. 2) All COMMON, HDFS, and MAPREDUCE issues that are BUGS and CRITICAL against any release: http://tinyurl.com/29w9bxw The goal is to assess whether the issues should be moved to BLOCKER state for Hadoop 0.22 If you have other BUG issues that you believe are blockers but are not in the BLOCKER or CRITICAL Jira state, then please mark them as such before this review occurs so that they can be evaluated. ***I will be removing the 0.22 FIX VERSION for all non-blocker issues before these reviews start.*** As always, test and doc IMPROVEMENTS are always eligible for commit to 0.22. They should be marked as BLOCKER with FIX VERSION set to 0.22. I may downgrade them from BLOCKER once we have the above reviews complete. I know this is a volunteer effort, but it doesn't hurt to have some goals. I'd like to start the review of these issues early next week and complete the review by Jan 21. I'd love to see blockers fixed by Feb 21 and have our first release candidate shortly thereafter. I'll try to coordinate test resources closer to that time. Thoughts on the above? Thanks, Nige From general-return-2666-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 00:20:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69231 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:20:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 00:20:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46941 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:19:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46900 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46891 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 00:19:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:19:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:19:50 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_KMnKR6wtSY5LljuUSASQZQ)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEK00E7MRKF9U60@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:19:28 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-05_12:2011-01-06,2011-01-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101050129 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:19:27 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> Message-id: <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_KMnKR6wtSY5LljuUSASQZQ) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Todd, would love to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first since this is failing every night on trunk. Nige On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other particular > JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets > enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the test-patch > turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. > > Thanks > -Todd > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on the ~30 >> Patch Available HDFS issues. >> >> Nige >> >> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can >>> haz snooty robot butler? >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> wrote: >>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >>>> unless it is done earlier. >>>> -- >>>> Take care, >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to >>>>> whip one up tonight. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll >> enable hdfs patch testing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Nige >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on >> HDFS is >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik >> wrote: >>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will be >>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a >> comment >>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but >> messier >>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 >>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually running >>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so >> that >>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < >> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving the >>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are >> all >>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for >> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from >> entering >>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < >> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would need >> to be >>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson >> could list >>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But that's >> still >>>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the tests >> and >>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a lot >> of >>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple >> patches. The >>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will >> decrease >>>>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't >> turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like both >> these >>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a >> reason to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is invaluable >> to >>>>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch >> themselves. We >>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there were >> known >>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing >> tests now is >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I >> know). This >>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests >> involve >>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. >> Currently, >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues >> that are in >>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these >> tests fixed >>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies to >> HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera --Boundary_(ID_KMnKR6wtSY5LljuUSASQZQ)-- From general-return-2667-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 00:34:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78225 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:34:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 00:34:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 61063 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:34:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60964 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60955 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 00:34:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:34:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:34:06 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so17149839iyb.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:33:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.31.139 with SMTP id y11mr7515511ibc.96.1294274025264; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:33:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:33:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:33:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235433303a8495b9049922a7c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00235433303a8495b9049922a7c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Todd, would love to get > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first since > this is failing every night on trunk. > What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold off the useful testing for all the other patches. -Todd On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi Nigel, > > > > MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other particular > > JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets > > enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the test-patch > > turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. > > > > Thanks > > -Todd > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on the > ~30 > >> Patch Available HDFS issues. > >> > >> Nige > >> > >> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >> > >>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can > >>> haz snooty robot butler? > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > >> wrote: > >>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, > >>>> unless it is done earlier. > >>>> -- > >>>> Take care, > >>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to > >>>>> whip one up tonight. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll > >> enable hdfs patch testing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Nige > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on > >> HDFS is > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will > be > >>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a > >> comment > >>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but > >> messier > >>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > >>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > >>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 > >>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually > running > >>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so > >> that > >>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < > >> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan > > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving > the > >>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are > >> all > >>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for > >> HDFS > >>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from > >> entering > >>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> jg > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < > >> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would > need > >> to be > >>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson > >> could list > >>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But > that's > >> still > >>>>>>>>>>> quite > >>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the > tests > >> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a > lot > >> of > >>>>>>>>>>> patches > >>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple > >> patches. The > >>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will > >> decrease > >>>>>>>>>>> errors > >>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. > >>>>>>>>>>>> -jg > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't > >> turn it on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like > both > >> these > >>>>>>>>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a > >> reason to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is > invaluable > >> to > >>>>>>>>>>> developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch > >> themselves. We > >>>>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there > were > >> known > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing > >> tests now is > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I > >> know). This > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests > >> involve > >>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. > >> Currently, > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues > >> that are in > >>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these > >> tests fixed > >>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies > to > >> HDFS as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00235433303a8495b9049922a7c7-- From general-return-2668-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 00:40:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79260 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 00:40:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 00:40:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 67081 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:40:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67034 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 00:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67026 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 00:40:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:40:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:40:26 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEK001QUSHWWW90@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:39:32 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-05_12:2011-01-06,2011-01-05,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101050132 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:39:31 -0800 Message-id: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be fixed quickly. Let me know. Thanks, Nige On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Todd, would love to get >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first since >> this is failing every night on trunk. >> > > What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then > enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's > something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold off > the useful testing for all the other patches. > > -Todd > > On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> Hi Nigel, >>> >>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other particular >>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets >>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the test-patch >>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on the >> ~30 >>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. >>>> >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>> >>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can >>>>> haz snooty robot butler? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>>> wrote: >>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >>>>>> unless it is done earlier. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Take care, >>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants to >>>>>>> whip one up tonight. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll >>>> enable hdfs patch testing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned on >>>> HDFS is >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch will >> be >>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a >>>> comment >>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but >>>> messier >>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better way. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The -1 >>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually >> running >>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does so >>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < >>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan >> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving >> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests are >>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again for >>>> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from >>>> entering >>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would >> need >>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if Hudson >>>> could list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But >> that's >>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the >> tests >>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a >> lot >>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple >>>> patches. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will >>>> decrease >>>>>>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't >>>> turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like >> both >>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there a >>>> reason to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is >> invaluable >>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch >>>> themselves. We >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there >> were >>>> known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing >>>> tests now is >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I >>>> know). This >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests >>>> involve >>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. >>>> Currently, >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues >>>> that are in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these >>>> tests fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed (applies >> to >>>> HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-2669-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 01:43:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1363 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 01:43:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 01:43:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2798 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 01:43:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2747 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 01:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2739 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 01:43:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 01:43:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 01:43:33 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so17194261iyb.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.208.17 with SMTP id ga17mr14942486ibb.121.1294278191505; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:43:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:42:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:42:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bc923d8615f0499239f11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba5bc923d8615f0499239f11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be > fixed quickly. Let me know. > > No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which fixes this test timeout for me. -Todd > On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> Todd, would love to get > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first since > >> this is failing every night on trunk. > >> > > > > What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then > > enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's > > something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold off > > the useful testing for all the other patches. > > > > -Todd > > > > On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Nigel, > >>> > >>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other > particular > >>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets > >>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the > test-patch > >>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Todd > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on > the > >> ~30 > >>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. > >>>> > >>>> Nige > >>>> > >>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can > >>>>> haz snooty robot butler? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, > >>>>>> unless it is done earlier. > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan > wrote: > >>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants > to > >>>>>>> whip one up tonight. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley > wrote: > >>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll > >>>> enable hdfs patch testing. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned > on > >>>> HDFS is > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < > cos@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch > will > >> be > >>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a > >>>> comment > >>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but > >>>> messier > >>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better > way. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > >>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The > -1 > >>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually > >> running > >>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does > so > >>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < > >>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < > jghoman@gmail.com > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving > >> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests > are > >>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again > for > >>>> HDFS > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from > >>>> entering > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < > >>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would > >> need > >>>> to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if > Hudson > >>>> could list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But > >> that's > >>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>> quite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the > >> tests > >>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a > >> lot > >>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> patches > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple > >>>> patches. The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will > >>>> decrease > >>>>>>>>>>>>> errors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't > >>>> turn it on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like > >> both > >>>> these > >>>>>>>>>>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there > a > >>>> reason to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is > >> invaluable > >>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch > >>>> themselves. We > >>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there > >> were > >>>> known > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing > >>>> tests now is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I > >>>> know). This > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests > >>>> involve > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. > >>>> Currently, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues > >>>> that are in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these > >>>> tests fixed > >>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed > (applies > >> to > >>>> HDFS as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Todd Lipcon > >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba5bc923d8615f0499239f11-- From general-return-2670-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 02:25:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18459 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 02:25:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 02:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 37398 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37352 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37344 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:25:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:25:18 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so16908465qwh.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:24:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hjoxvIamRAjHl4FKD2FS0C8Q6oLYqF+Hgh+BMi5lI+8=; b=Zs3X+BBgLGHB61HPfrcbfhwRz+9TGtUc4KDDCthTffUetgxk/EpKDZrLU2uzMkRYA3 dGoIUkRuYKbIhdy8eNVmBamPmnah+83nxJfiQxS1tsWMBJWURtPvBH+ZXvF6doyikJz7 lYIpZ/tX3S94P0BtrX6WdcedBDlRnvjz50794= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q1HVdgnWkD+19wu8tOiN6yvG1zJnDQOvbEKiiaDjfbWdlvTe1/fwLsTz+MlyyW+1q9 l1/1BWjWgNKd0whvpiVPC9MgzgPEp/eGpRPxuAtL7uPpiruTCDVT83PwJeSRpAE4GOVV ovYLVITmuo73a3SukfMgNZVNShsOAjpIBWmOQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.199.6 with SMTP id eq6mr22127078qab.272.1294280697675; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:24:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:24:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:24:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: decommission a rack From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the response. I did decommission the server and it took couple of minutes. However, I see the server in my "Dead Datanotes" page. How can I completely forget about this box? On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > Change your topology script? > > One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced conf= iguration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch =C2=A0are '= fat' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) > > If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (assum= ing it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottle neck= . (We use Ganglia) > > If you're seeing the rack count wrong, you could just bounce the cloud an= d it should show only two. > > Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to conside= r just killing the node, waiting till the cluster recognizes that its down = and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balancer progra= m will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) > > HTH > > -Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:56 AM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: decommission a rack > > Using 0.21 > > I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this > rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however > topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. =C2=A0If you a= re not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminati= on, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents,= is strictly prohibited. =C2=A0If you have received this communication in e= rror, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > From general-return-2671-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 02:30:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19247 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 02:30:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 02:30:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 42453 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 02:30:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42402 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 02:30:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42394 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 02:30:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:30:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:30:15 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so17426582qyk.14 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:29:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lk3VlRY98AuiTTb2zKEKDsow2ISxLeKV+HqUojCZWuw=; b=b1AEX9yoQsJgYIk2/17XzJeOpwArKAfrwgGcjHjgkTkXp2mO5aBxed3DqEM9LoMmDt euf8kwDiaFToNlS5LG4jLoCKHgSL5ZD34AgzHHhTA5VKWc0t+pGYkoMR0ePxB+EBbiLI j9bBg8e4YkPqlAcAtd0cxUAL3wcKk6gu3aJWA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=J8/YniOxi8ATHxtCiDZ9z4DgklQCsVoGzoyDuRbr+4w0sMjtJuSthAJ78FX+h7yJQO HNDQTEg8KTCocV1f786gSfGQB/a8gxxk2aoNwf1BhHhCqM0cX9aobzcDZ5CW3rwfrVzz BGipwdSGZa6Uf+DUpq+962TRCPv9YaWhsaFqQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.67.72 with SMTP id q8mr9625250qai.222.1294280994325; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:29:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:29:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Moving to a new namenode From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a new host, 8 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the old one. From general-return-2672-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 03:40:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42482 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 03:40:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 03:40:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 89625 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 03:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89523 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 03:40:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89499 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 03:40:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:40:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:40:34 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so6342222vws.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.188.201 with SMTP id db9mr6349960vcb.279.1294285212626; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:40:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.5.187] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm5206914vch.44.2011.01.05.19.40.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:40:11 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Holsman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:40:04 +1100 Message-Id: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm = welcome to the following people, who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. In no alphabetical order: =20 - Aaron Kimball - Allen Wittenauer=20 - Amar Kamat - Dmytro Molkov - Jitendra Pandey - Kan Zhang - Ravi Gummadi - Sreekanth Ramakrishna - Todd Lipcon I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project so = far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop = in the future Well done guys! --Ian From general-return-2673-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:09:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58569 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:09:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:09:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 8505 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:09:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8168 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:09:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7773 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:09:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:09:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:09:41 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so15481398fxm.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:09:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=exbgC/5acdnE/Ajqq87i6AzKtv3V8z7TTrwecrNq+98=; b=L/2O25grF6PxSxxdyQR5RHgtkLdmCY9bJ+BqGGLOFPzaR+CEymTCOQWarVotm3xXMh CclG7MjLa33L6HqdLX615vI10NraHfAJVaydg794IWaHhD6DceHsGmIRWXYTiACLxzpW WgWGec16bX5mL76KAiNhSanAxKCD/Z4NaDBA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=MaZ7Q49eRvyXw2RMukWq9VzdnmWrxgodKeYdMLZcL8QaTEWUNwd+dOPnAuy+X2ves+ 8AfZ6y/rl715loufekqovhuIN+pgLPy/SWMMFof0JOCCsxjoNCvdigr2AOR/u6Ovzotp umTsEIT0VogKwlG3gQziANkY9df9lPDE40sww= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.199 with SMTP id i7mr758939fan.56.1294286960385; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:09:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.136 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:09:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:09:20 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vzlBHJ_bY6IBpL6zR-ZjBKxFw3E Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project From: Stack To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congrats lads. St.Ack On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm welcome to the following people, > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. > > In no alphabetical order: > > - Aaron Kimball > - Allen Wittenauer > - Amar Kamat > - Dmytro Molkov > - Jitendra Pandey > - Kan Zhang > - Ravi Gummadi > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > - Todd Lipcon > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project so far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop in the future > > Well done guys! > > > --Ian > > From general-return-2674-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:11:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59180 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:11:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:11:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10679 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:11:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10559 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:11:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10536 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:11:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:11:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:11:35 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so15482369fxm.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:11:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O5QTmSS58FPN61V7P9JBie3xzci+ayaoiMjKHmYNk9Y=; b=j/SpjnyDPkyG7puWfgHHPWyn6FZweuf1DKe5AGonVJWc5j/qzCVDSbqz1II3WO2P0P yY9xxP5EYafAZGZvJl6HmTZ1QcwDVD1EC/YzqvwHR0wc+uO0na7IDQe2n4ra1Mi29ood SMtU7LSceAeUHCiaVEU5R6xB3StXkpIJOKUmI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rXBQ/vg9+x68ggCuB6F3yU9/mHVDvf3oLGARsM1qlgA55hw5+6dYTk5JfK1gtxWa9u y234H80jTKxayhBCjQJqIkGhZb19/eD+3grJTZBtCTbkUItUg2Pf7tSpvo4zmLTIi9zT U5MccaqvByRF2asMaKQ6b/japseJpyAxHJzOI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.83.11 with SMTP id d11mr3073436fal.37.1294287074538; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:11:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.83.136 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:11:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0C437F3B-1577-49E1-9C6A-7D4AA53ED9D9@mac.com> References: <0C437F3B-1577-49E1-9C6A-7D4AA53ED9D9@mac.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:11:14 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1nGplt5-mcHStbjT-OnxLEurmcE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'll give you $5.00 Nigel if you add HBase to the list below. St.Ack On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I think ZK, PIG, etc will also be included in the update I'm working on. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > >> Great. >> >> Nigel, >> Can you please document in somewhere on how you fixed it? We=B9d like to= fix >> it for ZooKeeper as well. >> >> Thanks >> mahadev >> >> >> On 10/20/10 1:23 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for >>>> HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. >>> >>> That would be great, Nigel. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> =A0 =A0Owen >>> >> > > From general-return-2675-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:35:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63320 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:35:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22233 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:35:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22023 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22002 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:35:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:35:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:34:59 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so16982636qwh.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:34:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lyG9fJdUD4k+5lC0b7mXnekCm4beVYWrzoUaFjRdK2w=; b=fLjlqH9p4Tg4LwSnwK1VFqjxUM2e0ChbcVoz9ddt+scaTdMJPb5vpogLgVwxiM8QZ0 MuiZEqkUnZhR0dtX/4qfRmDUrGtEYJ0eskE4syO+kmfAMuu8/LsWlbD8bAYQ51Bupv1H zo7UoupNnsXzVOFJhLbPbe6TEOG7vq7emmCzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qnF0Yq8qYobYiwLL/xboqBWuj6K0868GzkH0G/a9rVS6YTDFcUcRBnOcnAGlG/TBae P4b697fFed+6eILtIQds2W8SKKKER3/I2tQGJEV5BIUSIzYNPVDKw+loa3QsO4FeQ+vH ZcT5yo8A0J34fq0r9atnOC/E+0AtAmnsAGgEg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.142 with SMTP id kg14mr20948353qcb.133.1294288478926; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:34:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.185.129 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:34:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:34:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project From: Jay Booth To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64dda7605f92f0499260592 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64dda7605f92f0499260592 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congrats, all! On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Stack wrote: > Congrats lads. > St.Ack > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm welcome > to the following people, > > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. > > > > In no alphabetical order: > > > > - Aaron Kimball > > - Allen Wittenauer > > - Amar Kamat > > - Dmytro Molkov > > - Jitendra Pandey > > - Kan Zhang > > - Ravi Gummadi > > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > > - Todd Lipcon > > > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project so > far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop in > the future > > > > Well done guys! > > > > > > --Ian > > > > > --0016e64dda7605f92f0499260592-- From general-return-2676-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:36:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63789 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:36:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:36:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 25103 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:36:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24470 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:36:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24444 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:36:23 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so17297311iyb.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:36:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.218.6 with SMTP id ho6mr24686786icb.12.1294288561762; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:36:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.167.66 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:36:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:36:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a045f5f1230499260984 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054a045f5f1230499260984 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congratulations! Great to see the community growing once again. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > Congrats, all! > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Stack wrote: > > > Congrats lads. > > St.Ack > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm > welcome > > to the following people, > > > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. > > > > > > In no alphabetical order: > > > > > > - Aaron Kimball > > > - Allen Wittenauer > > > - Amar Kamat > > > - Dmytro Molkov > > > - Jitendra Pandey > > > - Kan Zhang > > > - Ravi Gummadi > > > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > > > - Todd Lipcon > > > > > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project > so > > far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop in > > the future > > > > > > Well done guys! > > > > > > > > > --Ian > > > > > > > > > --20cf3054a045f5f1230499260984-- From general-return-2677-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:51:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66674 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:51:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:51:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 37725 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:50:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37548 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37540 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:50:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:50:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:50:52 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Received: from [10.38.43.202] (166-205-139-112.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.139.112]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEL009SG420FL20@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:49:32 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-06_03:2011-01-06,2011-01-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101050149 Subject: Re: Patch testing References: <0C437F3B-1577-49E1-9C6A-7D4AA53ED9D9@mac.com> From: Nigel Daley X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) In-reply-to: Message-id: <4EF902B7-B44F-4133-A623-6295EA729E9A@mac.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:46:54 -0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Lol. At least now we know how much it's valued. I could get a foot long from= subway.=20 Cheers, Nige On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:11 PM, Stack wrote: > I'll give you $5.00 Nigel if you add HBase to the list below. > St.Ack >=20 > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> I think ZK, PIG, etc will also be included in the update I'm working on. >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige >>=20 >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: >>=20 >>> Great. >>>=20 >>> Nigel, >>> Can you please document in somewhere on how you fixed it? We=C2=B9d like= to fix >>> it for ZooKeeper as well. >>>=20 >>> Thanks >>> mahadev >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 10/20/10 1:23 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for >>>>> HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. >>>>=20 >>>> That would be great, Nigel. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Owen >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2678-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 04:54:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67549 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 04:54:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 04:54:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 40963 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:54:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40840 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 04:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40827 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 04:54:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:54:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of li.j2ee@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:54:04 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so16270152bwz.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:53:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JI6Xyzzajo/CBPgjSH9FDwhrbh5ssyb4CRLuRbZBg0k=; b=cqtknkCde1ocWJGRr466hApNJBi4Cq/G+4UgPU1CO59UcxlvYxScpzndEtpf8pNOKb L+ObIPqKy0atvtnOqfQjUFcuQsmXpYrzLZJTb6gnNsfQYqheYD9CBEJkOWK7VAjbO99Z ECBVpzHWdzy5GmudKR+lxCf2ScWmGBv5JCL2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GHivsj/4SNaO1adOU+njtDK8bFdfAvlBfBtsKVCh56yor7brjExpfEYfjCXPznv64F T2SVzkCvYm+KHvKtNAZjX0Wsw1rrFo01CmSvsmS7f8omdea1+zjlKwzCcK1LtnN4VpGD UDD/tSRrMl34f56JyVq3/fd0zuIqd1YEGp/Ko= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.207 with SMTP id n15mr10691621bkj.62.1294289622734; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.84.144 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:53:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:53:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project From: li ping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34c4433177704992649d0 --001636d34c4433177704992649d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable congratulations On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm welcome > to the following people, > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. > > In no alphabetical order: > > - Aaron Kimball > - Allen Wittenauer > - Amar Kamat > - Dmytro Molkov > - Jitendra Pandey > - Kan Zhang > - Ravi Gummadi > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > - Todd Lipcon > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project so > far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop in > the future > > Well done guys! > > > --Ian > > --=20 -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 --001636d34c4433177704992649d0-- From general-return-2679-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 05:00:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69171 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 05:00:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 05:00:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 48396 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:00:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48341 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:00:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48319 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 05:00:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:00:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:00:03 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so7494138ywo.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:59:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.145.7 with SMTP id s7mr23463102ybd.251.1294289979834; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v39sm15105817yba.7.2011.01.05.20.59.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:59:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:59:34 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch testing Message-ID: <20110106045934.GA14065@tp> References: <0C437F3B-1577-49E1-9C6A-7D4AA53ED9D9@mac.com> <4EF902B7-B44F-4133-A623-6295EA729E9A@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EF902B7-B44F-4133-A623-6295EA729E9A@mac.com> X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:46PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Lol. At least now we know how much it's valued. I could get a foot long f= rom subway.=20 But hurry Nige - pretty soon it's gonna be worthless ;( > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Jan 5, 2011, at 8:11 PM, Stack wrote: >=20 > > I'll give you $5.00 Nigel if you add HBase to the list below. > > St.Ack > >=20 > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I think ZK, PIG, etc will also be included in the update I'm working o= n. > >>=20 > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > >>=20 > >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > >>=20 > >>> Great. > >>>=20 > >>> Nigel, > >>> Can you please document in somewhere on how you fixed it? We=C2=B9d l= ike to fix > >>> it for ZooKeeper as well. > >>>=20 > >>> Thanks > >>> mahadev > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>> On 10/20/10 1:23 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>=20 > >>>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for > >>>>> HDFS, HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches. > >>>>=20 > >>>> That would be great, Nigel. > >>>>=20 > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Owen > >>>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >>=20 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk0lTDYACgkQenyFlstYjhJAOQD9HuO3zaOmzCBAZm2bqNcO7Cdu uFZpeWZRC56wXyk/oiwBAJP3rOkuu3Gc3kLFy5Vf/3PX9gh3zGCw/0coikBGcsRh =6ejt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From general-return-2680-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 05:15:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82307 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 05:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 61728 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61545 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61534 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 05:15:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:15:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:14:58 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p065E4JG089230 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lifthappen-lm.corp.yahoo.com (10.72.113.229) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:04 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:14:04 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) could you move this traffic to HDFS? thanks! On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current > namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a > new host, 8 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the > proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance > the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the > old one. From general-return-2681-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 07:22:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47322 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 07:22:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 07:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 56634 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 07:22:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56144 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 07:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56118 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 07:22:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:22:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepakmca05@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:22:49 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so17021057wye.35 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:22:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nMmVbQwwiewp4xLvTWWpcCGMndhWuHV87LFrqS+nFgU=; b=HWC0aq/Uxjm58Z31CIAYm1QZCf81D/AnHOR/6QkmBJe5Q4XtOnTRNdJkYSVJcFfw5o HU89ipk0Aoku0BFqcaDHsHorl+z7TPDrFMgh83f2wBXXBL7KmnV7e0Yg+GRVarhD3aYp pTBVuwoCMSCHaWQ6TkYNRtj7+5t1X9fwaoKek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ofDdp7Qy+3XE/+WB+FAni97PYCX/thIybn7WZbUrABvnRPjxNvO7n+aLEIikTg8TGP gzOg+DAAPHEB6REJ/7fig2DvGuDS+bSMj5kCWOgoCVpO5EKvrHhjSEQXs4zOJdLqSHEj Q1Di2X6r6yyXtCOPlGGEQrdyL+SlEH0pA5qww= Received: by 10.227.146.149 with SMTP id h21mr13997561wbv.43.1294298547764; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:22:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.206 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:22:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> From: Deepak Sharma Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:52:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163683394a2c3f010499285de1 --00163683394a2c3f010499285de1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable congrats all..I hope i'll be committer some day as well:) On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:23 AM, li ping wrote: > congratulations > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm welco= me > > to the following people, > > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. > > > > In no alphabetical order: > > > > - Aaron Kimball > > - Allen Wittenauer > > - Amar Kamat > > - Dmytro Molkov > > - Jitendra Pandey > > - Kan Zhang > > - Ravi Gummadi > > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > > - Todd Lipcon > > > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project s= o > > far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop = in > > the future > > > > Well done guys! > > > > > > --Ian > > > > > > > -- > -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 > --=20 Deepak Sharma http://www.linkedin.com/in/rikindia --00163683394a2c3f010499285de1-- From general-return-2682-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 09:43:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95113 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 09:43:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 09:43:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 2925 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 09:43:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2728 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 09:43:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92290 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 09:27:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhaval.makawana@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TxyNiS47T9jd0JtJPPrmL4yXZWaK/cqzHbcVojl6f5Q=; b=VUDTLMlq1qguvcu5P03nyysKoTDZaL5hJec8UxYde80CkngEYip8ip5sbAtZX5o708 kv3wRjsz5Oqg+ToAGt56V4UsuJFE60yiQSp+sdWMkw792qwvLHAhvkllw6Pc2PCygzQ8 GyGeOUx/VpOPsVd2KlsS9KirVKxu0sKDhp+H0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AZyHqu2rZdmb2YNwYQZGB2RAFlcSiW7tc+rvn6xjG8wPO5VFFeKVDU0D9Gb4OR22an zYQRNeAhUYJqPqwrRZw4sfyJT2NpfVpWIR2jwWwB9oQEo52se4x4Ls56fSbNGnZrBeAQ HJmG/SC7G7kl++RifZMcEyMjzNu/P9Mr6ChLU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Dhaval Makawana Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:56:51 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Reducer getting stuck after 66% processing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: vinayakh@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054ac85382dfd04992a1bac X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3054ac85382dfd04992a1bac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I have 1 GB of input data with 10954103 records going to 7 reducer tasks. The cluster is set up is such that each reducer gets 1 GB of RAM and 256 MB out of it is reserved for sorting. The reducer simply sums up one field of values and outputs all the values along with the sum value. The problem is all reducers are getting stuck after around 66% of processing. Tail of task tracker log reads as below. 2011-01-06 08:39:31,309 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Interleaved on-disk merge complete: 0 files left. 2011-01-06 08:39:31,309 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: In-memory merge complete: 2 files left. 2011-01-06 08:39:31,333 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Merging 2 sorted segments 2011-01-06 08:39:31,334 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Down to the last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 25352535 bytes 2011-01-06 08:39:31,343 INFO org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.CodecPool: Got brand-new compressor 2011-01-06 08:39:31,704 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Merged 2 segments, 25352537 bytes to disk to satisfy reduce memory limit 2011-01-06 08:39:31,704 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Merging 1 files, 2947959 bytes from disk 2011-01-06 08:39:31,705 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Merging 0 segments, 0 bytes from memory into reduce 2011-01-06 08:39:31,705 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Merging 1 sorted segments 2011-01-06 08:39:31,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Down to the last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 2947955 bytes Please help solving the problem. Regards, Dhaval --20cf3054ac85382dfd04992a1bac-- From general-return-2683-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 10:05:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 682 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 10:05:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 10:05:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 25847 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 10:05:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25572 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 10:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25552 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 10:05:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:05:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:05:00 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so6777968eyz.35 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=r/qM5Ds5oZ2fKNi3MyvDqA4edA1Mk6EtIIyeEyace/w=; b=GE5k+Vc+uu9LEUHRvxZniRtcg+tjxIJxaImnr+Frtfe9BFRyT9iCd0mO9ew/cEAbtX OOcIIyxB9XfqpJFb9vtsGSFy3kaPP9m5VcJRoh6oFIdbhlZO/4UG8LObDm8jmRHaIPHD JC9Z2JuKPwKw5y4pCl6JNSORU0zE0uVYB0Gtg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fo0Yo4gsqHGlISJ/WUN1moa/z1CQMMVO2lEF22zot4xT7ypm1fJMLJ1T2apO4K79jH HcThoTKXFpd7y4I91ZCooPaLvNyF4z1eTcqnAUgKe4ycT6IFIeyzQ3PY84J5PZafcocF I543k1gpv1bkKTDfipddaJzYd6Zpw6inprkvM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.22.142 with SMTP id n14mr17845656ebb.57.1294308280184; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.35.140 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 02:04:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:04:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project From: Lars George To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congratulations to all of you! On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Deepak Sharma wrote= : > congrats all..I hope i'll be committer some day as well:) > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:23 AM, li ping wrote: > >> congratulations >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >> >> > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm welc= ome >> > to the following people, >> > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. >> > >> > In no alphabetical order: >> > >> > - Aaron Kimball >> > - Allen Wittenauer >> > - Amar Kamat >> > - Dmytro Molkov >> > - Jitendra Pandey >> > - Kan Zhang >> > - Ravi Gummadi >> > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna >> > - Todd Lipcon >> > >> > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the project = so >> > far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to Hadoop= in >> > the future >> > >> > Well done guys! >> > >> > >> > --Ian >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 >> > > > > -- > Deepak Sharma > http://www.linkedin.com/in/rikindia > From general-return-2684-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 12:35:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72629 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 12:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 12:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 84720 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:35:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84537 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:35:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84529 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 12:35:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:35:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:35:22 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so17286787qwh.35 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:35:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GNKukIFKamPh999rM3aIXj6cWm5wBJBUb+aCNcNPZI0=; b=EXr4ugGs79YVSryasVKL1jHqESm/7W3WbifJzVP04snlTGLvzfZHDD0Zb8CiyHvjJB iuHajBfiZqUrVRAthVPklpnUrTN8Pg8xD7+lNQP1i5MUhSz3zE06KANG/07Mf1D3rfLO ofGEO2XD01XjJuuWRPnyK2l4x9zRnkC3K1KsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bNgYRe0o27Nc23aWPnIulUUnPp0xZtr3j+XtNMqPztDjpKC2b2kbopOrKYVvyK3/KL dzRAKNz7NOjPibZAQrimyZkYEYn5oUjGztSzK4X4dT9vhRpOIWTRuzzxedEDD5sfgtNG XaBNtoTUrgSVqL+vSJR5vSt9MidS1XWC8sQUA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.199.6 with SMTP id eq6mr22596527qab.272.1294317301321; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:35:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:35:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:35:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The current filesystem is in HDFS. Do you mean, create a new namenode on the new server and assign some data nodes to it and start moving the data off? On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > could you move this traffic to HDFS? > > thanks! > > On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current >> namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a >> new host, =C2=A08 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the >> proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance >> the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the >> old one. > > From general-return-2685-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 12:43:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74548 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 12:43:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 12:43:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 96857 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:43:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96750 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96738 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 12:43:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:43:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:43:50 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so15745376fxm.35 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QMmNE4I/BuwrRWp8DiD8NZu27Eg1xtKqzulbI/qBlAY=; b=BeDdhD3XDe2wCJLLIra85rTFuOPRWwFPRf7TpRk5GlJNAK2/jHfLdU394ZyZ/06Ev4 5TCHP7LdO8vS7ZDDQtWVfpovOeM2MuLdoiVsBFy3GNjXPTeAQxl8zqJx1I3RDsFmoelU sFHwjtho1xv4FenwR1tf/etlp+qOWZHR6zO+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xz5FEimIY6/+nlGcCocyeGReIavFwNUKzwdjJ5WEV7gMe762D5rT3ifizQYNla0GGX m9KTv/OpWOwF2Iy+ypVNeJeqlvgaHq8RCC8gogJOrLvy1A8IUgxClj7xIJfWKVhLKFsV Qg2fg79OYpdUGqGp09LnCDOY3tLeoHVAR45nA= Received: by 10.223.72.202 with SMTP id n10mr10685214faj.74.1294317808463; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:43:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:43:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:13:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No, he meant to move the discussion to the hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org list for HDFS queries. Sending to hdfs-user, bcc'ing to general. [This the right way?] On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > The current filesystem is in HDFS. > > Do you mean, create a new namenode on the new server and assign some > data nodes to it and start moving the data off? > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> could you move this traffic to HDFS? >> >> thanks! >> >> On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> >>> What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current >>> namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a >>> new host, =A08 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the >>> proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance >>> the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the >>> old one. >> >> > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2686-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 12:57:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77499 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 12:57:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 12:57:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 22237 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:57:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22118 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 12:57:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22103 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 12:57:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:57:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:57:35 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so17812140qyk.14 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:57:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6F79ak9XuL6nxMjo7ALwXWwTf2mDzGaIst9g6bqohj8=; b=bibtT0HmvFSIejOCMDpBOhdWbQGKGAEpceQoGdS42pAsGPKYJkuHHNhPYxdgHtjFAz +owAOSPt3Ed+VkfvjzYFqCclvvCbnv/uyVTyEDlX2wzA9QRSNnZiTkjkeVNYKVs9i0Nc naJSUuZ3DSZisw3cbtIt5rRWemFXXv9cUaEy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=avS8u5Dz0EV7BWpLGW5IGOgTCSR9paoXNGfRxDMtHyoqk/Fgqo+D/qpS49wAob2hXi QSqwk2I8lc2CfjNWFMn2N9xU/BQrAkSIeiRNQ/JCvb4lg3ZcgiviEWA7KI6jvsvlLBL6 vLYvmz4BoAXO6/R3c6bB9MUfC02PrAnnW5L1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.67.208 with SMTP id s16mr20176885qai.322.1294318634712; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.118.20 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:57:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:57:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org sorry everyone. I have subscribed to hdfs-users list and will discuss this there. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Harsh J wrote: > No, he meant to move the discussion to the hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org > list for HDFS queries. > > Sending to hdfs-user, bcc'ing to general. [This the right way?] > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> The current filesystem is in HDFS. >> >> Do you mean, create a new namenode on the new server and assign some >> data nodes to it and start moving the data off? >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> wrote: >>> could you move this traffic to HDFS? >>> >>> thanks! >>> >>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> >>>> What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current >>>> namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a >>>> new host, =C2=A08 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the >>>> proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance >>>> the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the >>>> old one. >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > From general-return-2687-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 15:01:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38074 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 15:01:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 15:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 36876 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 15:01:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36654 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 15:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36636 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 15:01:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:00:57 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p06F0MBd079144; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:00:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (10.73.152.71) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:00:21 -0800 Subject: Re: Moving to a new namenode MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:00:19 -0800 CC: "hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <30091EA3-7035-40B7-AA83-7934C02894E9@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks! Don't worry, we should make this clear on the site. I apologize, I didn't mean to spam the list with my suggestion! On Jan 6, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > sorry everyone. I have subscribed to hdfs-users list and will discuss > this there. > > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Harsh J wrote: >> No, he meant to move the discussion to the hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org >> list for HDFS queries. >> >> Sending to hdfs-user, bcc'ing to general. [This the right way?] >> >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> The current filesystem is in HDFS. >>> >>> Do you mean, create a new namenode on the new server and assign some >>> data nodes to it and start moving the data off? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler >>> wrote: >>>> could you move this traffic to HDFS? >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the correct procedure to move to a new namenode? My current >>>>> namenode is running on a 2 core with 4gb of memory. I am moving to a >>>>> new host, 8 core x 32 GB of memory. My question are: what is the >>>>> proper way to move to the new namenode, and what can I do to enhance >>>>> the performance of it since the new hardware is much superior than the >>>>> old one. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J >> www.harshj.com >> From general-return-2688-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 15:04:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38959 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 15:04:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 15:04:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 46287 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 15:04:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46141 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 15:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46129 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 15:04:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:04:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:04:37 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p06F3xfC051343; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:03:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (10.73.152.71) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:03:58 -0800 Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:03:56 -0800 CC: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) congrats all! =20 And thanks for your years and years of contribution to date! E14 On Jan 6, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Lars George wrote: > Congratulations to all of you! >=20 > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Deepak Sharma = wrote: >> congrats all..I hope i'll be committer some day as well:) >>=20 >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:23 AM, li ping wrote: >>=20 >>> congratulations >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I would like to extend a warm = welcome >>>> to the following people, >>>> who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on Hadoop. >>>>=20 >>>> In no alphabetical order: >>>>=20 >>>> - Aaron Kimball >>>> - Allen Wittenauer >>>> - Amar Kamat >>>> - Dmytro Molkov >>>> - Jitendra Pandey >>>> - Kan Zhang >>>> - Ravi Gummadi >>>> - Sreekanth Ramakrishna >>>> - Todd Lipcon >>>>=20 >>>> I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into the = project so >>>> far, and look forward to future contributions they will make to = Hadoop in >>>> the future >>>>=20 >>>> Well done guys! >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> --Ian >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -- >>> -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Deepak Sharma >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/rikindia >>=20 From general-return-2689-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 19:06:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77548 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 19:06:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 19:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 66237 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 19:06:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66185 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 19:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66166 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 19:06:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:06:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:06:24 +0000 Received: from 201-127.76-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.76.127.201] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pav9v-0008UD-HL; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:06:03 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: "Owen O'Malley" Subject: Re: Test instance of Gerrit? Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:05:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org References: <201012220856.27550.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101062005.54067.thomas@koch.ro> Owen O'Malley: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > > Now my question is, whether there's some interest from developers to give > > > Gerrit a try? In this case, I'd setup a private toy instance and import > > your > > project. > > I'll give it a try. Could you import hadoop common, hdfs, and mapreduce? > > -- Owen Hi Owen, The gerrit instance is running on http://koch.ro:8080 Projects imported are ZooKeeper and Hadoop-(common|hdfs|mapreduce). Since Gerrit is a Patch review system, you don't "see" anything about the projects but only get a list of patches waiting for review. You can upload a patch like git push ssh://koch.ro:29418/PROJECT/NAME \ LOCAL_REF:refs/for/DESTINATION-BRANCH/OPTIONAL-TAG I used: git push ssh://koch.ro:29418/zookeeper/zookeeper \ ZOOKEEPER-823_on_tlp:refs/for/trunk/ZOOKEEPER-823 you may want to use sth. like: git push ssh://koch.ro:29418/hadoop/mapreduce \ MY_BRANCH:refs/for/trunk The project names are hadoop/common, hadoop/hdfs and hadoop/mapreduce. I'm available on Freenode as thkoch at CET working hours. Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-2690-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 20:54:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25239 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 20:54:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 20:54:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 26523 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 20:54:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26481 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 20:54:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26473 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 20:54:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:54:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.15] (HELO col0-omc1-s5.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:54:08 +0000 Received: from COL117-W27 ([65.55.34.9]) by col0-omc1-s5.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:53:47 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_1ba0912b-7d23-4731-bf62-cfd56bee4e99_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: decommission a rack Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:53:47 -0600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2011 20:53:47.0931 (UTC) FILETIME=[D09CCEB0:01CBADE3] --_1ba0912b-7d23-4731-bf62-cfd56bee4e99_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Its ok if its in the dead column.=20 Take it out of your slaves file and when you reboot=2C it will not show up = at all.=20 Until then its just a foot note in history. :-) > Date: Wed=2C 5 Jan 2011 21:24:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: decommission a rack > From: magawake@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > Thanks for the response. >=20 > I did decommission the server and it took couple of minutes. However=2C > I see the server in my "Dead Datanotes" page. How can I completely > forget about this box? >=20 >=20 > On Wed=2C Jan 5=2C 2011 at 10:01 AM=2C Segel=2C Mike = wrote: > > Change your topology script? > > > > One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced co= nfiguration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch are 'fat= ' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) > > > > If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (ass= uming it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottle ne= ck. (We use Ganglia) > > > > If you're seeing the rack count wrong=2C you could just bounce the clou= d and it should show only two. > > > > Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to consi= der just killing the node=2C waiting till the cluster recognizes that its d= own and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balancer pr= ogram will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday=2C January 05=2C 2011 5:56 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: decommission a rack > > > > Using 0.21 > > > > I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this > > rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however > > topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient=2C you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n=2C distribution=2C or copying of this communication=2C or any of its cont= ents=2C is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in= error=2C please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message = and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > = --_1ba0912b-7d23-4731-bf62-cfd56bee4e99_-- From general-return-2691-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 21:00:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28668 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 21:00:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 21:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 37018 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:00:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36936 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36928 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 21:00:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:00:26 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p06KxOC0015079 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:59:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294347565; bh=+9JWtIdVT+s7ppAKx7B+VsrlmqyvhcIqQYS/VPgod5M=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=m+I3yRU7R8G63FHCe8peZYD5Ep32dvjhLn/x0injBnBPlecNxT5tyPX/hA2q9klkW CSQCTW12wU8Avwf5iECEZ3jlyDltQoOYWmLx3TVd7jYsiX8ItRBkm9FAKmlqS4fobs zo3kxnyFh6N+gt5xLZghh5/1tk/7i70n54jUb220= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:59:24 -0800 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:59:22 -0800 Subject: Re: decommission a rack Thread-Topic: decommission a rack Thread-Index: Acut4/KV0HiPsV1BS1uUPFIwrj0rWQAAKUmp Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C94B6D2A2E46Asureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C94B6D2A2E46Asureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Removing from slaves file only prevents launching datanode process on that = node. If you you use dfs.hosts configuration to set include file with list of dat= anodes, remove it from that as well. This will ensure: * datanode cannot register with the namenode. * datanode will not be shown in the dead list. Regards, Suresh On 1/6/11 12:53 PM, "Michael Segel" wrote: Its ok if its in the dead column. Take it out of your slaves file and when you reboot, it will not show up at= all. Until then its just a foot note in history. :-) > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:24:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: decommission a rack > From: magawake@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Thanks for the response. > > I did decommission the server and it took couple of minutes. However, > I see the server in my "Dead Datanotes" page. How can I completely > forget about this box? > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > Change your topology script? > > > > One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced co= nfiguration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch are 'fat= ' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) > > > > If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (ass= uming it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottle ne= ck. (We use Ganglia) > > > > If you're seeing the rack count wrong, you could just bounce the cloud = and it should show only two. > > > > Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to consi= der just killing the node, waiting till the cluster recognizes that its dow= n and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balancer prog= ram will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:56 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: decommission a rack > > > > Using 0.21 > > > > I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this > > rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however > > topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is= strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, pl= ease notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy= of it from your computer or paper files. > > --_000_C94B6D2A2E46Asureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2692-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 21:03:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30196 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 21:03:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 21:03:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 43281 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:03:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43208 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43200 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 21:03:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:03:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:03:30 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p06KYcGt028982 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:34:38 -0600 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9078E4808BB8 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:03:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id kwOUI00zScj9sblG for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:03:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.51]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p06L39vR000738 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:03:09 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::55a6:5b94:5c00:fe39%12]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:03:09 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:03:07 -0600 Subject: RE: decommission a rack Thread-Topic: decommission a rack Thread-Index: Acut4/KV0HiPsV1BS1uUPFIwrj0rWQAAKUmpAAAPvFA= Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 Right.=20 But the point was that after decommissioning a node, it shows up as a dea= d node. By taking it out of slaves or whatever you set dfs.hosts to point= to, the node is effectively out of the cluster. So when you restart the = cluster, you won't touch the machine and the namenode won't see it or car= e about it. Of course you'll need to rebalance the cluster and run fsck to make sure = you have the correct amount of replications on the rest of the cluster. =20 -----Original Message----- From: Suresh Srinivas [mailto:sureshms@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 2:59 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: decommission a rack Removing from slaves file only prevents launching datanode process on tha= t node. If you you use dfs.hosts configuration to set include file with list of d= atanodes, remove it from that as well. This will ensure: * datanode cannot register with the namenode. * datanode will not be shown in the dead list. Regards, Suresh On 1/6/11 12:53 PM, "Michael Segel" wrote: Its ok if its in the dead column. Take it out of your slaves file and when you reboot, it will not show up = at all. Until then its just a foot note in history. :-) > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:24:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: decommission a rack > From: magawake@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Thanks for the response. > > I did decommission the server and it took couple of minutes. However, > I see the server in my "Dead Datanotes" page. How can I completely > forget about this box? > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > Change your topology script? > > > > One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced = configuration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch are = 'fat' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) > > > > If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (a= ssuming it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottl= e neck. (We use Ganglia) > > > > If you're seeing the rack count wrong, you could just bounce the clou= d and it should show only two. > > > > Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to con= sider just killing the node, waiting till the cluster recognizes that its= down and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balance= r program will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:56 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: decommission a rack > > > > Using 0.21 > > > > I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this > > rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however > > topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL a= nd is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you = are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemin= ation, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its cont= ents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in= error, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message = and any copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2693-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 06 21:04:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30471 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 21:04:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2011 21:04:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 44847 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:04:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44782 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2011 21:04:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44774 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2011 21:04:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:04:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:04:01 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p06L3B90060971 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:03:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294347792; bh=AkFUgN7Gp4o94NdF6iURgkv6jF8gt0fhZa3g17EyziE=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=T0gp2e+Ey3JTOLzR9QbtFxGOeBum+IwFYXrc8oAhmw/kv3t1OotMlThk63vU7LCFg Qd58m7TooJcNpfK2GkbQgwUqJupvwDQcz2epCLMMqStnz1E6dTUxJY+hV86we8GdVj xhEygVl6eLa8yGzj75b88VjstqpYoSXvC7j8vT9E= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:03:11 -0800 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:03:10 -0800 Subject: Re: decommission a rack Thread-Topic: decommission a rack Thread-Index: Acut4/KV0HiPsV1BS1uUPFIwrj0rWQAAKUmpAAAh+v0= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C94B6E0E2E46Csureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C94B6E0E2E46Csureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you still have the datanode in exlude list, remove it from there as well= ... On 1/6/11 12:59 PM, "Suresh Srinivas" wrote: Removing from slaves file only prevents launching datanode process on that = node. If you you use dfs.hosts configuration to set include file with list of dat= anodes, remove it from that as well. This will ensure: * datanode cannot register with the namenode. * datanode will not be shown in the dead list. Regards, Suresh On 1/6/11 12:53 PM, "Michael Segel" wrote: Its ok if its in the dead column. Take it out of your slaves file and when you reboot, it will not show up at= all. Until then its just a foot note in history. :-) > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:24:57 -0500 > Subject: Re: decommission a rack > From: magawake@gmail.com > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Thanks for the response. > > I did decommission the server and it took couple of minutes. However, > I see the server in my "Dead Datanotes" page. How can I completely > forget about this box? > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Segel, Mike wrote: > > Change your topology script? > > > > One thing about rack awareness. You never want to have an unbalanced co= nfiguration. The caveat is if your uplinks between the ToR Switch are 'fat= ' enough. (4 10GBe should do it.) > > > > If you watched your system with the one machine on a separate rack (ass= uming it was also on a separate switch) you'd see a major network bottle ne= ck. (We use Ganglia) > > > > If you're seeing the rack count wrong, you could just bounce the cloud = and it should show only two. > > > > Note: Deprecating a machine can take a long time. You may want to consi= der just killing the node, waiting till the cluster recognizes that its dow= n and I believe just kicking off an FSCK or maybe running the balancer prog= ram will clean that up faster than deprecating. (YMMV) > > > > HTH > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mag Gam [mailto:magawake@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 5:56 AM > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: decommission a rack > > > > Using 0.21 > > > > I have a server which was in rack3. It was the only server in this > > rack so I decommissioned the server. fsck shows only 2 racks however > > topology shows 3 racks. How can I fix this? > > > > > > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and= is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is= strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, pl= ease notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any copy= of it from your computer or paper files. > > --_000_C94B6E0E2E46Csureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2694-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 07 05:13:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50239 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2011 05:13:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2011 05:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 66583 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 05:13:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66410 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 05:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66402 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2011 05:13:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:13:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gautamkowshik@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:13:26 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so19415478iwn.35 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:13:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=HkDpjVTuZfcVIuAo8LOmZ9Ls0Lwo+0M9S/2wVBNYh80=; b=wC3cGpq+zW1hLH+U5PD7YnVIO8hdF6WWg94jepl9+mGJ0Dk3l5/6ZzKuRS4bvyvBRY xgSt3QYO7fNrjHk08gvcM7iQuhY+OPz5M5MQrZK/vXpTZmlxCa8d9Fp0Tc5uClE07Mqe QOl6/b2EJFwsI8sAwKoL2d3O9IhAM3zDqVso0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=W2LKuaqJ8ZaU6dBrq7ytowec2SOD63wsWe4BM9GuH91z3NQmxhYP7kZSAAz9/uDl1U tUxV9egtHlQrFl915C5sEjfC8/+xolptz+EO9uo0kOfTpmBzkk1GcDmMniGEJq2Vtwa3 NJOFrjpFwegkaiQsQOUTeoVPJcVwIoFpPX4e8= Received: by 10.42.178.200 with SMTP id bn8mr409092icb.529.1294377184876; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:13:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.128.206.164] ([166.205.136.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id he5sm315938icb.22.2011.01.06.21.13.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:13:02 -0800 (PST) References: Message-Id: <6EDB68F4-7EE2-43AA-B1AB-9AE676155F77@gmail.com> From: Gautama Kowshik To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: Reducer getting stuck after 66% processing Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:12:50 -0800 Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "vinayakh@gmail.com" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Reducers are supposed to stream out data. Do not wait for the last value to arrive in the reduce to put it out in the collector. Call output.collect on each value. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:26 AM, Dhaval Makawana wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have 1 GB of input data with 10954103 records going to 7 reducer > tasks. > The cluster is set up is such that each reducer gets 1 GB of RAM and > 256 MB > out of it is reserved for sorting. The reducer simply sums up one > field of > values and outputs all the values along with the sum value. The > problem is > all reducers are getting stuck after around 66% of processing. Tail > of task > tracker log reads as below. > > > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,309 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: > Interleaved on-disk merge complete: 0 files left. > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,309 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: In- > memory > merge complete: 2 files left. > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,333 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: > Merging 2 > sorted segments > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,334 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Down > to the > last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 25352535 bytes > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,343 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.CodecPool: Got > brand-new compressor > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,704 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: > Merged 2 > segments, 25352537 bytes to disk to satisfy reduce memory limit > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,704 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: > Merging 1 > files, 2947959 bytes from disk > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,705 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: > Merging 0 > segments, 0 bytes from memory into reduce > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,705 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: > Merging 1 > sorted segments > > 2011-01-06 08:39:31,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Merger: Down > to the > last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 2947955 bytes > > > Please help solving the problem. > > > Regards, > > Dhaval From general-return-2695-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 07 22:11:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39215 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2011 22:11:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2011 22:11:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 57053 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 22:11:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56964 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 22:11:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56956 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2011 22:11:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:11:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:11:45 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_2EODpMQZAMxQO8NYrj3T/Q)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEO00J66AXYYZ80@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:11:10 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-07_11:2011-01-07,2011-01-07,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101070089 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:11:08 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_2EODpMQZAMxQO8NYrj3T/Q) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hrm, the MR precommit test I'm running has hung (been running for 14 hours so far). FWIW, 2 HDFS precommit tests are hung too. I suspect it could be the NFS mounts on the machines. I forced a thread dump which you can see in the console: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/10/console Any other ideas why these might be hanging? Thanks, Nige On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be >> fixed quickly. Let me know. >> >> > No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which fixes > this test timeout for me. > > -Todd > > >> On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Todd, would love to get >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first since >>>> this is failing every night on trunk. >>>> >>> >>> What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then >>> enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's >>> something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold off >>> the useful testing for all the other patches. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Nigel, >>>>> >>>>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other >> particular >>>>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets >>>>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the >> test-patch >>>>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Todd >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on >> the >>>> ~30 >>>>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nige >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I can >>>>>>> haz snooty robot butler? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >>>>>>>> unless it is done earlier. >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants >> to >>>>>>>>> whip one up tonight. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done I'll >>>>>> enable hdfs patch testing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is turned >> on >>>>>> HDFS is >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < >> cos@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch >> will >>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a >>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but >>>>>> messier >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better >> way. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. The >> -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually >>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson does >> so >>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < >>>>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < >> jghoman@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, saving >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests >> are >>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again >> for >>>>>> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from >>>>>> entering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests would >>>> need >>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if >> Hudson >>>>>> could list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But >>>> that's >>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the >>>> tests >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are a >>>> lot >>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple >>>>>> patches. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, will >>>>>> decrease >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we won't >>>>>> turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks like >>>> both >>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is there >> a >>>>>> reason to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is >>>> invaluable >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch >>>>>> themselves. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there >>>> were >>>>>> known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more failing >>>>>> tests now is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I >>>>>> know). This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing tests >>>>>> involve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. >>>>>> Currently, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS issues >>>>>> that are in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting these >>>>>> tests fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed >> (applies >>>> to >>>>>> HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera --Boundary_(ID_2EODpMQZAMxQO8NYrj3T/Q)-- From general-return-2696-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 07 23:34:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83812 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2011 23:34:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2011 23:34:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 94589 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94497 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94247 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:34:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.212] (HELO nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:34:02 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm19.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Jan 2011 23:33:41 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.179] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Jan 2011 23:33:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1062.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Jan 2011 23:33:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 785420.3524.bm@omp1062.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 27461 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2011 23:33:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294443221; bh=ouMbyJ5ZMCDrtJnE0h8W220Pfhmh8jM/xIjxqR4Sq64=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tbOm9ugzjouxNrnYVHfS1gH/tYktw+qhE1e9atbKdG8dOTYhrbwD4eprQpGRUz8wPPHeMvfjxViHD1HYXdHr7T5ZBZ0zkj95lao3LRZ1NyOAnddsjSPXp2mxtJz6NqtjRvj2hq25mzndIepIX+3ecUrPM3uvByZpgEQ/Obt5d9g= Message-ID: <533710.16018.qm@web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: y078T_oVM1lxgxv0QorkU9rajF0.SNzxrmbPMRJXLBtiKCo hwB.CXH6SMi5XGCj.6Z8CdG2zstFxDh.AkioN.dY_8mGRDLvJIDnlDroeVJj TKv9qJlX2CC.qldFdB5RNDx1w24a.SWqBBQ0WTZzshRsF.gBen0pFFPpiAlM yTkDTpg8TBgV.GwnhKFQCU.sDaNQxinUh8QdlAidOYczBoJE_JuXbP6hFtSG 2AdI96W0jJZPGKaeYO8H.59pJBuMkx7xT27qT07zDd9b1jcqUurTgTmZ4dgM qmR6SQ_HMVGpBRKgZ8E7iVaoUZhQIsiCO0BIXvOioQQ4iSiEXp7H1S3.oNXR b0vUwe1uPmYZG9A8P2eTIJWp_LfTyoVnY1.9Zp0f4XULut5uuDPaLXJDCnJz 3X.t4XSWR7V4y Received: from [69.106.200.155] by web65507.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:33:41 PST X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:33:41 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: apurtell@apache.org Subject: Re: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <93F81E22-00DB-451B-B6F2-BDB0EB550998@Holsman.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Congratulations to all! Best regards, - Andy --- On Wed, 1/5/11, Ian Holsman wrote: > From: Ian Holsman > Subject: Please join me in welcoming the following people as committers to the Hadoop project > To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 7:40 PM > On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I > would like to extend a warm welcome to the following > people, > who have all chosen to accept the role of committers on > Hadoop. > > In no alphabetical order: > > - Aaron Kimball > - Allen Wittenauer > - Amar Kamat > - Dmytro Molkov > - Jitendra Pandey > - Kan Zhang > - Ravi Gummadi > - Sreekanth Ramakrishna > - Todd Lipcon > > I appreciate all the hard work these people have put into > the project so far, and look forward to future contributions > they will make to Hadoop in the future > > Well done guys! > > > --Ian > > From general-return-2697-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 08 01:15:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39739 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2011 01:15:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2011 01:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 61995 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2011 01:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61902 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2011 01:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61894 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2011 01:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:15:09 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so19227645iyb.35 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:14:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.31.139 with SMTP id y11mr9972646ibc.96.1294449288166; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 17:14:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:14:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:14:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235433303a003c6704994b76fe --00235433303a003c6704994b76fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Hrm, the MR precommit test I'm running has hung (been running for 14 hours > so far). FWIW, 2 HDFS precommit tests are hung too. I suspect it could be > the NFS mounts on the machines. I forced a thread dump which you can see in > the console: > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/10/console > > Strange, haven't seen a hang like that before in handleConnectionFailure. It should retry for 15 minutes max in that loop. > Any other ideas why these might be hanging? > > There is an HDFS bug right now that can cause hangs on some tests - HDFS-1529 - would appreciate if someone can take a look. But I don't think this is responsible for the MR hang above. -Todd > On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be > >> fixed quickly. Let me know. > >> > >> > > No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which > fixes > > this test timeout for me. > > > > -Todd > > > > > >> On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> > >>>> Todd, would love to get > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first > since > >>>> this is failing every night on trunk. > >>>> > >>> > >>> What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then > >>> enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's > >>> something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold > off > >>> the useful testing for all the other patches. > >>> > >>> -Todd > >>> > >>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Nigel, > >>>>> > >>>>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other > >> particular > >>>>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets > >>>>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the > >> test-patch > >>>>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> -Todd > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on > >> the > >>>> ~30 > >>>>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nige > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I > can > >>>>>>> haz snooty robot butler? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < > cos@apache.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, > >>>>>>>> unless it is done earlier. > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants > >> to > >>>>>>>>> whip one up tonight. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done > I'll > >>>>>> enable hdfs patch testing. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is > turned > >> on > >>>>>> HDFS is > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < > >> cos@apache.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch > >> will > >>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a > >>>>>> comment > >>>>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but > >>>>>> messier > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better > >> way. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. > The > >> -1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually > >>>> running > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson > does > >> so > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < > >>>>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < > >> jghoman@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, > saving > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests > >> are > >>>>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again > >> for > >>>>>> HDFS > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from > >>>>>> entering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < > >>>>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests > would > >>>> need > >>>>>> to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if > >> Hudson > >>>>>> could list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But > >>>> that's > >>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the > >>>> tests > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are > a > >>>> lot > >>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple > >>>>>> patches. The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, > will > >>>>>> decrease > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we > won't > >>>>>> turn it on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks > like > >>>> both > >>>>>> these > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is > there > >> a > >>>>>> reason to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is > >>>> invaluable > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch > >>>>>> themselves. We > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there > >>>> were > >>>>>> known > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more > failing > >>>>>> tests now is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I > >>>>>> know). This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing > tests > >>>>>> involve > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. > >>>>>> Currently, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS > issues > >>>>>> that are in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting > these > >>>>>> tests fixed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed > >> (applies > >>>> to > >>>>>> HDFS as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Todd Lipcon > >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Todd Lipcon > >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00235433303a003c6704994b76fe-- From general-return-2698-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 02:56:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44615 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 02:56:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 02:56:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 62577 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 02:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62492 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 02:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62484 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 02:56:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 02:55:59 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEU009E28420F00@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:55:15 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-11_02:2011-01-11,2011-01-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101100156 From: Nigel Daley Subject: email lists: too many or not enough? Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:55:14 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either missing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. Given all our lists, it's not clear which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and cross project community/policy issues. general@ has perhaps become a catch all list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. Is that what we want? Should we create more lists to break out these topics? Live with the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some lists? Nige [*] I may have missed some: general@ security@ private@ common-user@ common-dev@ common-commits@ common-issues@ hdfs-user@ hdfs-dev@ hdfs-commits@ hdfs-issues@ mapreduce-user@ mapreduce-dev@ mapreduce-commits@ mapreduce-issues@ From general-return-2699-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 04:06:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80643 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 04:06:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 04:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 12769 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 04:06:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12422 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 04:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 04:06:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:06:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chenqibj@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.142] (HELO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:05:53 +0000 Received: from d23relay04.au.ibm.com (d23relay04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.246]) by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0B45Ve7023836 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:05:31 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p0B45V1E2359506 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:05:31 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p0B45VYk024585 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:05:31 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p0B45Uaq024576 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:05:30 +1100 Subject: Keith is out of office for a business trip Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Qi BJ Chen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:05:30 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 01/11/2011 12:05:30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBF286DF85FF698f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF286DF85FF69" Content-Disposition: inline --0__=C7BBF286DF85FF698f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF286DF85FF69 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2011-01-11 and will not return until 2011-01-14. --0__=C7BBF286DF85FF698f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF286DF85FF69-- From general-return-2700-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 05:24:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4997 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 05:24:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 05:24:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 57093 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 05:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56872 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 05:24:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56859 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 05:24:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:24:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:24:01 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0B5NVfc004151 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (10.72.76.201) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:23:31 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:23:29 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I'd love to have a list that covers most of what is on general (big = topics on governance, etc), but does not have usage questions on it. = I'd suggest creating a new list for that and letting general become a = general questions list. On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either = missing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. Given all our lists, it's not = clear which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and = cross project community/policy issues. general@ has perhaps become a = catch all list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. Is = that what we want? Should we create more lists to break out these = topics? Live with the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some = lists? >=20 > Nige >=20 > [*] I may have missed some: > general@ > security@ > private@ > common-user@ > common-dev@ > common-commits@ > common-issues@ > hdfs-user@ > hdfs-dev@ > hdfs-commits@ > hdfs-issues@ > mapreduce-user@ > mapreduce-dev@ > mapreduce-commits@ > mapreduce-issues@ From general-return-2701-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 05:52:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22091 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 05:52:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 05:52:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 78251 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 05:52:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78013 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 05:52:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78005 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 05:52:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:52:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:52:16 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so21303264wye.35 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:51:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr2428395wep.96.1294725115090; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:51:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:51:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:51:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -Tj7HpxakCVYudjBiIDi_6Fu5rs Message-ID: Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:23, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > I'd love to have a list that covers most of what is on general (big topic= s on governance, etc), but does not have usage questions on it. =A0I'd sugg= est creating a new list for that and letting general become a general quest= ions list. That what common-user@ is for. > On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either mis= sing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. =A0Given all our lists, it's not cle= ar which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and cross= project community/policy issues. =A0general@ has perhaps become a catch al= l list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. =A0Is that what we= want? =A0Should we create more lists to break out these topics? =A0Live wi= th the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some lists? >> >> Nige >> >> [*] I may have missed some: >> general@ >> security@ >> private@ >> common-user@ >> common-dev@ >> common-commits@ >> common-issues@ >> hdfs-user@ >> hdfs-dev@ >> hdfs-commits@ >> hdfs-issues@ >> mapreduce-user@ >> mapreduce-dev@ >> mapreduce-commits@ >> mapreduce-issues@ > > From general-return-2702-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 06:00:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24018 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 06:00:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 06:00:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 83846 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 06:00:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83634 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 06:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83626 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 06:00:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 06:00:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 06:00:43 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEU001LEGOLEP60@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:00:22 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-11_03:2011-01-11,2011-01-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101100168 Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:00:21 -0800 Message-id: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > That what common-user@ is for. Is it? AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. Nor do I see it documented anywhere that common-user@ is for cross hadoop user questions. Also, FWIW, that list is documented at hadoop.apache.org -> common -> developers -> mailing lists -- not very intuitive. Nige On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:23, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> I'd love to have a list that covers most of what is on general (big topics on governance, etc), but does not have usage questions on it. I'd suggest creating a new list for that and letting general become a general questions list. > > That what common-user@ is for. > >> On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either missing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. Given all our lists, it's not clear which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and cross project community/policy issues. general@ has perhaps become a catch all list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. Is that what we want? Should we create more lists to break out these topics? Live with the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some lists? >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> [*] I may have missed some: >>> general@ >>> security@ >>> private@ >>> common-user@ >>> common-dev@ >>> common-commits@ >>> common-issues@ >>> hdfs-user@ >>> hdfs-dev@ >>> hdfs-commits@ >>> hdfs-issues@ >>> mapreduce-user@ >>> mapreduce-dev@ >>> mapreduce-commits@ >>> mapreduce-issues@ >> >> From general-return-2703-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 07:12:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57858 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 07:12:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 07:12:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 34536 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 07:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34242 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 07:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34234 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 07:12:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:12:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:12:19 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c4.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.4]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0B7BZ6q008856 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:11:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294729896; bh=Iaue2uVd7N4CvUy25Laz1uCogle//A7zsL3HEbkoZqk=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=ON/WWtlFJc+zBYWqEODTwL2x7IJmxlUKUDL4yxOvcuGME8rpvFQgnEFTIWfjzlQy1 Te9sATG+wYFgx3sANPUr+LTSx0UGh/KLy0PStas6GOxwN0cbbniBn2eFu1QX6gl+t2 cfNtztPjoM5BnRRKOnEIBE2eyKMMLvYQG+f59wk4= Message-Id: <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-39-742599375 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:11:35 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-39-742599375 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/15/2010 02:28 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 08/30/2010 02:14 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Since most people seemed to think of it as a reasonable idea, I'm > going > to create the hadoop-0.20-security branch and start the necessary > work. > > I don't yet see this branch. Are you still intending to do this? > > Doug Things stalled, my apologies. Turns out having a kid is a lot of work, who knew! *smile* I'm back now and plan to start work on this. Hopefully I can get this over with quickly, in a couple of weeks, to focus on the next release(s). thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-39-742599375-- From general-return-2704-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 07:24:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59271 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 07:24:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 07:24:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 40147 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 07:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 07:24:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39839 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 07:24:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:24:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of iphulari@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.48] (HELO mail-pz0-f48.google.com) (209.85.210.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:24:12 +0000 Received: by pzk28 with SMTP id 28so3498828pzk.35 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:23:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wC46xZuuPmI3Ecj9zVN9U/Yi2/qVhio1q3XgHxHlXtw=; b=m0PYy+cYYXJ2NdkkLVR0AlSr1RpGALSxqDXSZKsNLJUPkUYIJgFj1yXp1d9HpvcTy5 pflVTbN1oHGY1rmbjXkf4jBzr6jKB1q9W55SjYxWCbyzxMEqbRDZRf8FuEnf28WI1bPb TY+b3af2N17p6A3Y4ZQ3N4yJ8te7tao7FjVUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=T/unycwOz8YxP82jvVV7PAKfyx3RHw+84oovoHb2Dqx3oS36XMPzDu3oWtAOLmXgu7 NCEOdIRyu0NRYIJCHtxytv/10PH/CK7QBUJaBHeo4xYdfWQH9gdkPGNDF+2Tu4+iKJRv F55T/F65D2RD5lr0MwKrtvjklMdLePSxJwxng= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.170.9 with SMTP id s9mr5250467wfe.187.1294730632147; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.80.17 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:23:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:23:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Reposting - Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system time. From: Ravi Phulari To: hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32db268b23b04998cf72e --000e0cd32db268b23b04998cf72e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Friends, I am seeing Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system time. I found that this problem was discussed on on mailing list earlier but there was no solution posted. http://www.mail-archive.com/hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg00310.html I am wondering what is causing this behaviour and how to fix it. As you can see below system time is in UTC and Hadoop is showing EST. [hadoop@hadoop~]$ date Mon Jan 10 21:54:17 UTC 2011 [hadoop@hadoop ~]$ hadoop jar $HADOOP_HOME/*examples.jar teragen 1000 tera-dir Generating 1000 using 2 maps with step of 500 11/01/10 16:50:33 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201101061958_2590 11/01/10 16:50:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201101061958_2590 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 6 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=2 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters I thought possible workaround for this issue to add -Duser.timezone in conf/hadoop-env.sh but it works only on my localsystem but not on cluster. Why is hadoop reporting wrong EST time format? From where hadoop reads time? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Ravi --000e0cd32db268b23b04998cf72e-- From general-return-2705-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 09:09:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 878 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 09:09:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 09:09:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 62369 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 09:09:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62060 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 09:09:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62046 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 09:09:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:09:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.128.214.242] (HELO magdalenammc.nazwa.pl) (85.128.214.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:09:46 +0000 Received: from Pavilionl (unknown [62.233.208.194]) by magdalenammc.nazwa.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4622F2FA8CA3 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:09:26 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Magdalena_Moll-Musia=B3?= To: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Job opportunity - Hadoop Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:09:24 +0100 Message-ID: <003c01cbb16f$3dd6e1d0$b984a570$@com.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcuxU7lVzaDt7I7FQVWzEV4twNUtvwAGvcdA Content-Language: pl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello,=20 I am Recruitment Agency and I am looking for Hadoop specialists for this role: http://www.mm-consulting.com.pl/analitics.html It is a permanent position in Berlin, Germany. Salary - 40-65 k = depending on candidate's seniority. =20 The offer is for candidates from Europe and US. If you are interested, please send me a copy of your CV and suggest when = I can call you via phone or via skype. Thank you. Best regards, Magda=20 ______________________________________ mmConsulting Magdalena Moll-Musia=B3 recruitment partner=20 +48 516 340 127 office@mm-consulting.com.pl www.mm-consulting.com.pl =20 __________ Informacja programu ESET NOD32 Antivirus, wersja bazy = sygnatur wirusow 5776 (20110110) __________ Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona przez program ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.pl lub http://www.eset.com=20 =20 From general-return-2706-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 17:07:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93348 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 17:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 17:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 86011 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:07:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85863 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85855 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 17:07:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:07:17 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so6086875ewy.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.4.82 with SMTP id 60mr3057782wei.89.1294765614980; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:06:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:06:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:06:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fUZUnKuFt_lXDBOefQjnkplFJEc Message-ID: Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 22:00, Nigel Daley wrote: >> That what common-user@ is for. > > Is it? =A0AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. =A0Nor do I= see it documented anywhere that common-user@ is for cross hadoop user ques= tions. =A0Also, FWIW, that list is documented at hadoop.apache.org -> commo= n -> developers -> mailing lists -- not very intuitive. While I in agreement with your logic above.. Let's see... If I have a use question about Hadoop (not HDFS nor MR) where would I go? general@ doesn't sound very convincing... A-ha! common-user@.... *firing up email client* Instead of creating new lists to add an insult to the injury perhaps we shall just make the intention for the existing ones more apparent? E.g. re-organize 'mailing lists' section or something? I believe developers, in general, are able to find information on their own. Users sometimes demonstrate a lack of such ability ;) And we are well beyond 'dev. only' community as far as I can see. Cos > Nige > > > On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:23, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> I'd love to have a list that covers most of what is on general (big top= ics on governance, etc), but does not have usage questions on it. =A0I'd su= ggest creating a new list for that and letting general become a general que= stions list. >> >> That what common-user@ is for. >> >>> On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> This project has a lot of email lists [*] -- but I feel we're either m= issing 1 or 2 lists or we have too many. =A0Given all our lists, it's not c= lear which one we should use to talk about cross project dev issues and cro= ss project community/policy issues. =A0general@ has perhaps become a catch = all list with user, dev, and community issues inter-mixed. =A0Is that what = we want? =A0Should we create more lists to break out these topics? =A0Live = with the current inter-mingling? Or consolidate some lists? >>>> >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> [*] I may have missed some: >>>> general@ >>>> security@ >>>> private@ >>>> common-user@ >>>> common-dev@ >>>> common-commits@ >>>> common-issues@ >>>> hdfs-user@ >>>> hdfs-dev@ >>>> hdfs-commits@ >>>> hdfs-issues@ >>>> mapreduce-user@ >>>> mapreduce-dev@ >>>> mapreduce-commits@ >>>> mapreduce-issues@ >>> >>> > > From general-return-2707-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 17:39:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9094 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 17:39:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 17:39:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 49158 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:39:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48998 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48990 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 17:39:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:39:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:39:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 8942 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 17:38:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:38:55 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so20904079bwz.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:38:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.127.89 with SMTP id f25mr15347866bks.143.1294767533471; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:38:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.61.73 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:38:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:38:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db2934e63a850499958e1e --0016e6db2934e63a850499958e1e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > That what common-user@ is for. > > Is it? AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if someone updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. Actually, we also need to move Zookeeper to the related projects of the site. -- Owen --0016e6db2934e63a850499958e1e-- From general-return-2708-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 17:50:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14886 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 17:50:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 17:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 71648 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:50:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71574 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 17:50:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71566 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 17:50:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:50:26 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so20104822fxm.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:50:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nBQgHicJE1go7gPMUMEvX9mDClbqzSjrBrtiKVaTUc4=; b=LFLic7cgwfLM0oywunoPSwW/I8XLuLJ9mmKsquNP7Ww76HuHlGQYF7c6OmIovCDI5j ksQdhXsUg4sAe0V8VOw1Rrmzd88FoEZtiqeE4wUOP+eZ7cntNNXtgl2cWBI5iWg668+k oe63MccAu1b5wbsvjFgrxxuJEz8tAWD6TpvPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q2pAqJ57Q26SM3SeN4VkVrWYgQzV+N0lIvNcxfhMD0B6xHhixrRdB0TLTJl1InFmU4 rKl1lPmw98uvBo2DA4JZ7vFy4T1KTABK39bn/mrqrc+lsN7bhBxWLINp8FnI2xpuzkiW g9yDyihnuJ6hG20/PpZYdp2ulL5BRuYCMm4zA= Received: by 10.223.72.9 with SMTP id k9mr1318530faj.93.1294768205337; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:50:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:49:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:19:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reposting - Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system time. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is probably your TZ configuration. Your linked archive thread does have a solution posted in it [exporting TZ to have the proper timezone in the environment], have you tried that? On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ravi Phulari wrote: > Hello Friends, > =A0I am seeing Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system > time. I found that this problem was discussed on on mailing list earlier = but > there was no solution posted. > > =A0http://www.mail-archive.com/hdfs-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg00310.html > > I am wondering what is causing this behaviour and how to fix it. > > As you can see below system time is in UTC and Hadoop is showing EST. > > [hadoop@hadoop~]$ date > Mon Jan 10 21:54:17 UTC 2011 > > [hadoop@hadoop ~]$ hadoop jar $HADOOP_HOME/*examples.jar teragen =A01000 > tera-dir > Generating 1000 using 2 maps with step of 500 > 11/01/10 16:50:33 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201101061958_25= 90 > 11/01/10 16:50:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0map 0% reduce 0% > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0map 100% reduce 0% > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201101061958_2= 590 > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 6 > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0 Job Counters > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0 =A0 Launched map tasks=3D2 > 11/01/10 16:50:40 INFO mapred.JobClient: =A0 FileSystemCounters > > I thought possible workaround for this issue to add -Duser.timezone in > conf/hadoop-env.sh but it works only on my localsystem but not on cluster= . > > Why is hadoop reporting wrong EST time format? From where hadoop reads ti= me? > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > Thanks in advance, > Ravi > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2709-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 18:42:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60318 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 18:42:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 18:42:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 84756 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 18:42:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84711 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 18:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84703 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 18:42:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:42:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 60051 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 18:41:50 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:41:50 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so20967758bwz.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.77 with SMTP id g13mr2214713bkj.170.1294771306050; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:41:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.61.73 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:41:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:41:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Reposting - Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system time. From: "Owen O'Malley" To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502dd82c335ff0499966f9d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502dd82c335ff0499966f9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Ravi Phulari wrote: > Hello Friends, > I am seeing Hadoop log timestamps & file timestamps not same as system > time. Please use common-user for general usage questions. General is for announcements and discussions about the project. Thanks, Owen --00504502dd82c335ff0499966f9d-- From general-return-2710-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 18:50:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63883 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 18:50:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 18:50:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 95618 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 18:50:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95516 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 18:50:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95508 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 18:50:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:50:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of samplise@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:50:27 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so9293554gyf.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:50:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y1ESiz+GtotFJxIok/bG7nZbDd1bwawpkgeuCNbtOJU=; b=ooqSD0PyyMzh6LupfIM/qpP5rPf8on/07otB3rnJKCjYlbYO4pS2kdKksmPKc2Nlj0 tFwwN5ltLqZHxvPIU0S+JPQgtZI2qcwsOhi0gSrfiip3SNFDZjHW0FdcluJPuNZ8DNjk VRw1gG1Y02bgVpsdZNDoU1OTjuHGaJWIe3Oug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j5/8O3hjsgUKKAK2HtB0KuWIe4gDvNHI/IvQlWgbMzwVjoVRZSfVlYnhNqk93j3hVD az2fuVxqRxbRZkK+P9UuwAVXrmurnsFR+GlovgdvPGsg5vZR11jf5MuqZopNNTrGRJIZ Leakl/BEnXxNqbuyiSTVIJ//UNdDY1bHVxO3Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.57.3 with SMTP id f3mr548773yba.446.1294771806385; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.14.3 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:50:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:50:06 -1100 Message-ID: Subject: Application for testing From: Bo Sang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd30b1c95b67d0499968d6f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd30b1c95b67d0499968d6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, guys: I have deployed a hadoop on our group's nodes. Could you recommend some typical applications for me? I want to test whether it can really work and observe its performance. -- Best Regards! Sincerely Bo Sang --000e0cd30b1c95b67d0499968d6f-- From general-return-2711-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 19:14:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82184 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 19:14:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 19:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 44373 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:14:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44100 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:14:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44083 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 19:14:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:14:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:13:52 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so21986402wye.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=NEz7X9slbBgFTT1pKtV1ZPR1SDFw0iOe1lMlxO1jldc=; b=shEGZliOx3TAib0Rzer1qY8rCGCowLKNyGlSl/27CMja86vuDSnLL7gAMFGuI9oafr sUTbbVtSoQfnRHH7W4zvOh7Nc/O8sLSQxifdO67wulNpMcQwfbew05udf9jbwkR5jCcH s37DE+kqPDP7qcrVAC8u5RyOvhO3LrCRZy8fw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rSAf6WNeyFxyGml+dWxxPn1yhVmTlo4VoKFt9dKL5Azwkk0Zz+dRgJoDBshoo2ekDr Ovfd5cW9PFxtecffBTeQ8ZomkpCGPYg7Nft9zZPU1fvOgVlIbf83Ci5SJeihHQwrxBsl nhf7Rze5Ze5BgRyKNZsZxhwr8CD0681ahsk6c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.48.5 with SMTP id u5mr114739web.96.1294773212445; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:13:31 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: i7QgO2gPIG3TfkXQUVr1dwDTfD4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Things stalled, my apologies. Turns out having a kid is a lot of work, who > knew! *smile* > Really (smile -- congrats Arun). > I'm back now and plan to start work on this. Hopefully I can get this over > with quickly, in a couple of weeks, to focus on the next release(s). > What you thinking? What'll you call it? Good on you, St.Ack From general-return-2712-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 11 19:24:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87235 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 19:24:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 19:24:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 64409 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:24:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64351 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64343 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 19:24:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:24:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:23:54 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so20196937fxm.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:23:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=0mO9zRmnnS9XekAI9l2ht/y+CWYbgBIhGwcZw/RMU5Q=; b=M8xaIjPzpEca68+NPkrTZcUKwTiJxFwzeSzpIKSHd2yTA8dGbUgi2ihmv/b4xkeFym S22pQ2egi6Q6dmKjUbtgQU0NhzJSjBDsqZgOh4eFMawVuHUrkcSlz7CCXWrTD3H4pXi6 AQSj9ElCrL2RpEpojoT/Hv05lrgX1/9yutrqc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=P1BBs5RWil7I+hT022fUPmNIohSAU864Z1h3N/kszzT0TCqJh34410oKnRYCrWTl0n 45xb0jW/SdkQ0WGQ3U+FHCvVVEzGDa2uBB1GVSlHIU57UhkF7bsHkgN6A2sMTHNMNcg+ aK0RcCfSBkKpUKs4wENRhPZKTQtpmvqPk12u8= Received: by 10.223.72.202 with SMTP id n10mr3511768faj.74.1294773527722; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:18:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.14 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:18:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:48:08 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Application for testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Are you looking to benchmark? You could run Gridmix, if so. http://hadoop.apache.org/mapreduce/docs/current/gridmix.html On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Bo Sang wrote: > Hi, guys: > > I have deployed a hadoop on our group's nodes. Could you recommend some > typical applications for me? I want to test whether it can really work and > observe its performance. > > -- > Best Regards! > > Sincerely > Bo Sang > -- Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2713-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 04:36:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69217 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 04:36:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 04:36:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 7901 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 04:36:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7450 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 04:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7441 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 04:36:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 04:36:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 04:35:54 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEW00JJ67EL2Q10@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:35:10 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101110167 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_02:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:35:09 -0800 Message-id: <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> That what common-user@ is for. >> >> Is it? AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. > > > We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if someone > updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. Ok, I'll work on a page. > Actually, we also need to move Zookeeper to the related projects of the > site. I'll do that too. Can't remember -- do we file Jira's and patches for site changes? I couldn't find a component for site in Hadoop Jira. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2714-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 05:10:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87819 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 05:10:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 05:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 36661 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:10:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36403 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:10:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36392 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 05:10:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:10:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:10:07 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas05.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.39]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0C59WC1031506 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.39]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:09:31 -0800 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:09:21 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AcuyFuUQTxglYTDWRCaST/brpshVPw== Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "Stack" wrote: >> I'm back now and plan to start work on this. Hopefully I can get this ov= er >> with quickly, in a couple of weeks, to focus on the next release(s). >>=20 >=20 > What you thinking? What'll you call it? >=20 > Good on you, > St.Ack Thanks Stack.=20 I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that it's= a big jump? Anything else? Arun= From general-return-2715-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 05:44:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11172 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 05:44:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 05:44:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 70371 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:44:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69970 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69954 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 05:44:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:44:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:44:01 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so107879yxm.35 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.7 with SMTP id r7mr1012366yhg.80.1294811020042; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from tp (c-24-4-185-157.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.185.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm202448yhl.27.2011.01.11.21.43.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:43:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:43:34 -0800 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Application for testing Message-ID: <20110112054334.GA21574@tp> Reply-To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos X-PGP-Key: http://www.boudnik.org/~cos/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Moving general@ to Bcc: list) Bo, you can try to run TeraSort from Hadoop examples: you'll see if the cluster is up and running and cen compare its performance between upgrades,= if needed. Also, please don't use general@ for user questions: there's common-user@ li= st exactly for these purposes. With regards, Cos On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:50AM, Bo Sang wrote: > Hi, guys: >=20 > I have deployed a hadoop on our group's nodes. Could you recommend some > typical applications for me? I want to test whether it can really work and > observe its performance. >=20 > --=20 > Best Regards! >=20 > Sincerely > Bo Sang --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk0tP4UACgkQenyFlstYjhJxgQEAtmXhVttWmpTwH0YdjWnwCvNf rwt1Wmpph8c45wD/vh4BALqnCNpf5m04mAKJyQ+BuLopHYWCk45V9HK3ewsHcEBS =3+ZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From general-return-2716-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 05:46:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12131 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 05:46:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 05:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 77945 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:46:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77747 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 05:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77739 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 05:46:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:46:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:46:33 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so214738wwd.29 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.4.82 with SMTP id 60mr3592952wei.89.1294811172020; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:46:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:45:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:45:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another approach to clean-up general@ is to manually reroute (with appropriate comment) user questions to common-user@ or other relevant user lists. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 20:35, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>>> That what common-user@ is for. >>> >>> Is it? =A0AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. >> >> >> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if som= eone >> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. > > Ok, I'll work on a page. > >> Actually, we also need to move Zookeeper to the related projects of the >> site. > > I'll do that too. =A0Can't remember -- do we file Jira's and patches for = site changes? =A0I couldn't find a component for site in Hadoop Jira. > > Cheers, > Nige > > From general-return-2717-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 06:55:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41257 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 06:55:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 06:55:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 29311 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 06:55:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28975 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 06:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28966 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 06:55:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:55:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:54:59 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0C6sGUj093787 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:54:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (10.72.244.10) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:54:16 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:54:10 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Thanks nigel!! I think some text on this page suggesting various lists for questions = and a clean definition of what should go to general would go a long way. http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>>> That what common-user@ is for. >>>=20 >>> Is it? AFAICT we don't try to move user discussions there. >>=20 >>=20 >> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if = someone >> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >=20 > Ok, I'll work on a page. >=20 >> Actually, we also need to move Zookeeper to the related projects of = the >> site. >=20 > I'll do that too. Can't remember -- do we file Jira's and patches for = site changes? I couldn't find a component for site in Hadoop Jira. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 From general-return-2718-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 17:09:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20244 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 17:09:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 17:09:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 20605 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20391 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20382 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 17:09:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:09:01 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas04.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.5]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0CH829W084720 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.5]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:08:03 -0800 From: Mahadev Konar To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:08:02 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AcuyFuUQTxglYTDWRCaST/brpshVPwAZGAFB Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en, en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1. I like the idea of 20.100. Thanks mahadev On 1/11/11 9:09 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "Stack" wrote: >=20 >>> I'm back now and plan to start work on this. Hopefully I can get this o= ver >>> with quickly, in a couple of weeks, to focus on the next release(s). >>>=20 >>=20 >> What you thinking? What'll you call it? >>=20 >> Good on you, >> St.Ack >=20 > Thanks Stack. >=20 > I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that it= 's a > big jump? Anything else? >=20 > Arun=20 >=20 From general-return-2719-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 17:16:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23234 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 17:16:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 17:16:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 33808 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:16:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33437 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33428 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 17:16:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:16:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:16:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 23115 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 17:16:19 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.16]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:16:19 +0000 Message-ID: <4D2DE1E2.9030805@apache.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:16:18 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/11/2011 08:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I'll do that too. Can't remember -- do we file Jira's and patches for site changes? I couldn't find a component for site in Hadoop Jira. I've often made trivial site changes without filing an issue. For something that might need review I've filed an issue with component=documentation and version=site. The latter keeps it from being associated with any release. We could also add a 'site' component though. Doug From general-return-2720-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 17:27:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29496 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 17:27:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 17:27:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 57358 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:27:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57148 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57140 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 17:27:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:27:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of patrickangeles@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:27:30 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so382239ewy.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:27:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5wPC1MK9oj3JMav2Qr8XaIJhLxZfpcoLPdfR8CaF6VM=; b=PkjPdWav/L0Y5W5TqRyC9GwZMEbJIG6IAUvC1DkgpXuswnNHzmvbaoG8rQ4fJv5sxN lg6qqfWsZ1V0BhagvONEQWAhnsLPkV8K4nOGgZO5FoyJaZrNXdyhrPOIxWsCSjq7aApT KW0BirHn6PedS4MjNdxixeJogL7jfTn1eWpUw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jY0I9hUHrfnCTze2c3azUo0W7fcDLTLh3Lu8haE1Z12fHejYZNSG0NZ8JGKW49/Hal 4H6CMev+qjsXnV1YgWWh3Noirut4cY7iTQ0hsqLtMPk/IJ0DkfKLGTzsyoJzW8PqLo27 qlVKWGpyTI5cwRsD8qLhGPCuKk7OjXTl6AYAw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.32.193 with SMTP id e1mr1432532ebd.74.1294853229187; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:27:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: patrickangeles@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.33.8 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:27:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:27:09 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _likBWvF29T9SET7wLgT2NS_H1U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Patrick Angeles To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3f04c315530499a982db --0015174c3f04c315530499a982db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You're gonna call your kid 20.100? :) Congratz On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "Stack" wrote: > > >> I'm back now and plan to start work on this. Hopefully I can get this > over > >> with quickly, in a couple of weeks, to focus on the next release(s). > >> > > > > What you thinking? What'll you call it? > > > > Good on you, > > St.Ack > > Thanks Stack. > > I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that it's > a big jump? Anything else? > > Arun --0015174c3f04c315530499a982db-- From general-return-2721-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 17:48:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35550 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 17:48:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 17:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 86191 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86139 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 17:48:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86131 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 17:48:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_JHEPgmpPBxpVmuLHbEDIBA)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX0066E83120Y0@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:47:26 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_05:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120090 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:47:25 -0800 In-reply-to: <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> Message-id: <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_JHEPgmpPBxpVmuLHbEDIBA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if someone >> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. > > Ok, I'll work on a page. Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the subscription instructions (it's a new page). I couldn't figure out how to add cell padding around the table cells so it looks squished -- any forrest deities out there that can provide the right incantation? >> Actually, we also need to move Zookeeper to the related projects of the >> site. > > I'll do that too. Done. But didn't remove the tab or change the links. They still point to hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper. Turns out zookeeper.apache.org isn't fully ready according to Patrick. Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_JHEPgmpPBxpVmuLHbEDIBA)-- From general-return-2722-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 18:09:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57313 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 18:09:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 18:09:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 18:09:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23267 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 18:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23259 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 18:09:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:09:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:09:26 +0000 Received: from omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ufVi1f0040cQ2SLA4i95FX; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:09:05 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ui8w1f0082SbwD58Wi8zdg; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:09:03 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:08:56 -0800 References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great >>> if someone >>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >> >> Ok, I'll work on a page. > > Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html > Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the > subscription instructions (it's a new page). I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: user questions: common-user hdfs-user mapreduce-user security - only for notifying the project of security vulnerabilities project level announcements and discussions: general developer questions: common-dev hdfs-dev mapreduce-dev jira and subversion tracking for developers: common-issues common-commits hdfs-issues hdfs-commits mapreduce-issues mapreduce-commits -- Owen From general-return-2723-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 18:45:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76363 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 18:45:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 18:45:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 63146 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 18:45:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62970 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 18:45:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11381 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 18:04:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rakeshdav@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hR8uIVej8Pgs5RgoyJjvOiLezAkfErJLFkjbEKMK6Fs=; b=ZlSuvxsolfZDRt1l9jf864fUvABcL+E3VV6TtpITNaqznzUx/N4ooPJECF3nDulkBy 53AUlBuWT81XJ+0gK7PgvA/16lz+4ztgJ50yk9R9o6kJX1sQQmSRU86zTOPmd9dLGxB2 iwMFzm44HTnpzO1LMXEZOo/SrhA0AdyX5E4c4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=n55MYfHQ/p7pguWLUmP8JAwqfLhfJuNG/OK9u3IRq4IEpP+nFxxwcdvrsUzDbfzNoi dbGDReCohvFTiwtG6gPC+9qq4xs2zrtEnixAF2bZHvsTlwwiQynae27hP6KITHZ3tXKX hpblfmKLLagr9Kxzy8tY8SJo/x8AFxfsmSuXs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:33:56 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Restricting number of records from map output From: Rakesh Davanum To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64c3c3855c8a30499aa06cc --0016e64c3c3855c8a30499aa06cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I have a sort job consisting of only the Mapper (no Reducer) task. I want my results to contain only the top n records. Is there any way of restricting the number of records that are emitted by the Mappers? Basically I am looking to see if there is an equivalent of achieving the behavior similar to LIMIT in SQL queries. Thanks & Regards, Rakesh --0016e64c3c3855c8a30499aa06cc-- From general-return-2724-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 19:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13605 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 19:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 19:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 73539 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 19:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73458 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 19:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73450 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 19:53:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:53:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:53:37 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so977638qyk.14 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:53:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=2nZI0eiy5taBvTz6wwg9QO2hEPWN0HI6OKmZrbaZrzA=; b=tdwJZTjCRXz1rEDUvbHhvgdl0E493o6mQ1nyRZt+Z+kFRpaePW5BVhkYa3wK/dhWR6 0ZQc53i95G8LkncGxgqGqIgTyCC8XmYSsSRhBuJwKckBNzz1N1c+KxVGCIKRWzACPrDi QN/CoqZ9qlgFdMIlbt3jJSOHZFoZvkb5JJKPs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PZfeZ5rqqApuGNpcQ+ni5WJkp5+OamqRqL//uPXh6vRzkej6lQTgjCjXKIb0Hzlvgf Vik/l3pbQDzMdZN2zVGxgDg19D/jvQwgtoYLoNZXIsBesgO62WtcRyiKxD+N/miUxDzy aZkT7iK44aAiJE/81V13/2hgki/n/ygccYvJU= Received: by 10.224.135.227 with SMTP id o35mr1291030qat.75.1294861996687; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:53:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.17] (h-64-236-128-41.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm722175qcu.19.2011.01.12.11.53.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:53:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:53:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <796C0A0E-F54A-4B1A-8CD9-5C663F7330AF@Holsman.NET> References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) to add some metrics to this discussion. we have ~3,500 unique email addresses subscribed to at least one hadoop = mailing list. subscribed to: 1 list : 2431 2 lists: 784 3 lists: 238 4 lists: 118 5 lists: 56 6 lists: 66 7 lists: 102=20 (I didn't look at the various 'issues or commits' mailing lists). So I'm not really sure adding another list will get more focused = discussions, or further split up the community. On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great = if someone >>>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >>>=20 >>> Ok, I'll work on a page. >>=20 >> Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html >> Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the = subscription instructions (it's a new page). >=20 > I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: >=20 > user questions: > common-user > hdfs-user > mapreduce-user > security - only for notifying the project of security vulnerabilities >=20 > project level announcements and discussions: > general >=20 > developer questions: > common-dev > hdfs-dev > mapreduce-dev >=20 > jira and subversion tracking for developers: > common-issues > common-commits > hdfs-issues > hdfs-commits >=20 > mapreduce-issues > mapreduce-commits >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-2725-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 20:15:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31231 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 20:15:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 20:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 6669 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 20:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6610 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 20:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6602 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 20:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:15:35 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00A1JEWVAT00@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:14:56 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_05:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120115 Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <796C0A0E-F54A-4B1A-8CD9-5C663F7330AF@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:14:54 -0800 Message-id: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> <796C0A0E-F54A-4B1A-8CD9-5C663F7330AF@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ya, if we keep general@ to it's intended purpose (and better document/enforce the use of various lists) then there is no need for a new list. I'll make the edit's Owen suggested to the revamped mailing_lists.html. I'm still confused, however, where release discussions should happen. general@ or common-dev@? I guess I'll leave them on general@ unless this is enough opposition to that. Nige On Jan 12, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > to add some metrics to this discussion. > > we have ~3,500 unique email addresses subscribed to at least one hadoop mailing list. > > > subscribed to: > 1 list : 2431 > 2 lists: 784 > 3 lists: 238 > 4 lists: 118 > 5 lists: 56 > 6 lists: 66 > 7 lists: 102 > > (I didn't look at the various 'issues or commits' mailing lists). > > So I'm not really sure adding another list will get more focused discussions, or further split up the community. > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if someone >>>>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >>>> >>>> Ok, I'll work on a page. >>> >>> Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html >>> Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the subscription instructions (it's a new page). >> >> I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: >> >> user questions: >> common-user >> hdfs-user >> mapreduce-user >> security - only for notifying the project of security vulnerabilities >> >> project level announcements and discussions: >> general >> >> developer questions: >> common-dev >> hdfs-dev >> mapreduce-dev >> >> jira and subversion tracking for developers: >> common-issues >> common-commits >> hdfs-issues >> hdfs-commits >> >> mapreduce-issues >> mapreduce-commits >> >> -- Owen > From general-return-2726-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:02:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45262 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:02:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:02:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 71134 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:02:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70929 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70921 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:02:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:02:07 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0CL1Rsp090511 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:01:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294866087; bh=oAXonzEV5TBVnTUpFjfqwa7lhDrCN8EfhUXpdGhlOZs=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=AwS+nWUrlzWOGpFeN5Zpc9UP5b0uqokm0CTlh3BuKbqpYvHFCsGEA9CeG3m77bEtY LcxRqiYEEMR5oRmtAGGNWaHBrmBu2xCuagC9nchIaXbgJM7oN2Rs5L8QwDLKCpLxJR /BrkR+eShKOrWadbkBpPYNLsC6825XzbjG4J2tzY= Message-Id: <03FDF0A8-B2C3-4962-903B-36F5BE2C7FC7@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:01:28 -0800 References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> <796C0A0E-F54A-4B1A-8CD9-5C663F7330AF@Holsman.NET> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 12, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Ya, if we keep general@ to it's intended purpose (and better > document/enforce the use of various lists) then there is no need for > a new list. I'll make the edit's Owen suggested to the revamped > mailing_lists.html. > > I'm still confused, however, where release discussions should > happen. general@ or common-dev@? I guess I'll leave them on > general@ unless this is enough opposition to that. > +1 for general@. It seems to have the widest coverage. Arun > Nige > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > >> to add some metrics to this discussion. >> >> we have ~3,500 unique email addresses subscribed to at least one >> hadoop mailing list. >> >> >> subscribed to: >> 1 list : 2431 >> 2 lists: 784 >> 3 lists: 238 >> 4 lists: 118 >> 5 lists: 56 >> 6 lists: 66 >> 7 lists: 102 >> >> (I didn't look at the various 'issues or commits' mailing lists). >> >> So I'm not really sure adding another list will get more focused >> discussions, or further split up the community. >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>>>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be >>>>>> great if someone >>>>>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >>>>> >>>>> Ok, I'll work on a page. >>>> >>>> Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html >>>> Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the >>>> subscription instructions (it's a new page). >>> >>> I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: >>> >>> user questions: >>> common-user >>> hdfs-user >>> mapreduce-user >>> security - only for notifying the project of security >>> vulnerabilities >>> >>> project level announcements and discussions: >>> general >>> >>> developer questions: >>> common-dev >>> hdfs-dev >>> mapreduce-dev >>> >>> jira and subversion tracking for developers: >>> common-issues >>> common-commits >>> hdfs-issues >>> hdfs-commits >>> >>> mapreduce-issues >>> mapreduce-commits >>> >>> -- Owen >> > From general-return-2727-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:11:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56886 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:11:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:11:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83600 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83491 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83483 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:11:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:11:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.96] (HELO qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:11:30 +0000 Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ufSN1f0041GhbT859lBAJE; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:11:10 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ulB01f00m2SbwD53TlB4Dp; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:11:08 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:10:59 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show > that it's a big jump? Anything else? Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be the right name for such a release. Thoughts? -- Owen From general-return-2728-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:27:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60512 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:27:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 99745 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:27:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99604 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:27:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99595 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:27:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:27:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:27:00 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1068792qyk.14 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:26:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=JxD+ZYWKopVEdKuyiKSOcMXNz23YgRCngR4ZXZp47oY=; b=ax/YSkyoMMdyCHzZPqYIgCj/eTp0wORmhY6vRglaYQDFk0pLgBEPxFcITnvIUltGk2 tQP7exKLCP2Z7SJvXqtTeXOSptWkM1pKvMZ82v50e3kI3ssvKN85S5De4rGuFQoUG6E/ c2HzhpLbmShR3k+V7LKAqaPPh8Eu4Z0RKnefM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=hLQC2bAYXLP/ueCHqMaTfXivMuTxxJe3Q+idZwr7NK5heUHOaibLeLdI2ZoZ89mf/v x5CWvhg8f0q8Nsy5HR4scOelLn0fF91wXAcrbHpkSSD/EugCJUJ7uVspUxS0gMb12s8m raBFDNJaeWaTqHs3XDJGmmjizqHezzWB38Yzo= Received: by 10.224.61.11 with SMTP id r11mr1310611qah.230.1294867598492; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.23] (h-64-236-128-43.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17sm776916qci.45.2011.01.12.13.26.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:26:37 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:26:36 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2404862E-9910-4680-9FF9-10F305B56085@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org so if 0.20 becomes 1.0, what does 0.22 become ? I'm still not sure if we shouldn't just add security to 0.22, and leave = the 0.20 in maintenance mode from here on. On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show = that it's a big jump? Anything else? >=20 >=20 > Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this = patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 branches. = Given that, I think that a new major release number makes the most = sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor releases will = be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. We've talked about = declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels like backing into = the decision, but technically, I believe it to be the right name for = such a release. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > -- Owen From general-return-2729-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:35:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63878 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:35:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:35:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17262 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17203 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17195 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:35:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:35:14 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-snve-246-69.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-snve-246-69.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.69]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0CLYeFT013923 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:34:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294868080; bh=NbdLJ5Go3uzg1qmM3LZhG2PnzQUk0yOTUaCb33pOd9w=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=OJ1VlCanwiiGhI1+ahrOjlnCbrXQ0tFSzb/BsxwH1DOTA+kyqNMpDiQ7/8JM+63AG G1MtmneXmKBtShCwXZ4E8dEe7iVQ3C1Tl2FBs5PnadJopX6TcXrGi8TD1VSnA3MKpr S6/H8xTCDID+irKLLdD6eNKoq4ALEJIPu70uQ6cU= Message-Id: <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:34:41 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in the past too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung up on a release number. I just *do not* want a controversy. As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; so, I could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 is what I'm priming for. Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far ahead he is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this hadoop-0.20.200. All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our last stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the hands of our users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. Arun On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >> that it's a big jump? Anything else? > > > Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this > patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 > branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes > the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor > releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. > We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels > like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be > the right name for such a release. > > Thoughts? > > -- Owen From general-return-2730-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:54:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70204 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 65694 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65631 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65623 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:54:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:54:19 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0CLrOHR090210 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from lifthappen-lm.corp.yahoo.com (10.72.113.229) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:53:23 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:53:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <9181E726-4686-4C31-AC8E-232830A0EC5A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Let me second arun here. This is incremental work on 0.20. We're happy to support any branch = naming strategy the community likes, but sticking with 20. seems = like the right default approach. =20 Let's discuss 1.0 issues on another thread. Our priority is to get our = work into other folks hands. Thanks! E14 On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. >=20 > Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in =20= > the past too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung =20= > up on a release number. I just *do not* want a controversy. >=20 > As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; =20= > so, I could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. >=20 > I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 =20= > is what I'm priming for. >=20 > Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far =20 > ahead he is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this =20 > hadoop-0.20.200. >=20 > All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our =20= > last stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the =20 > hands of our users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. >=20 > Arun >=20 > On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >>> that it's a big jump? Anything else? >>=20 >>=20 >> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this >> patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 >> branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes >> the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor >> releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. >> We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this = feels >> like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be >> the right name for such a release. >>=20 >> Thoughts? >>=20 >> -- Owen >=20 From general-return-2731-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 21:58:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71304 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 21:58:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 21:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 69216 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69136 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 21:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69128 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:58:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:58:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:58:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 71242 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 21:57:52 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:57:52 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so1100293iyb.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.7 with SMTP id fw7mr384083ibb.41.1294869472078; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2404862E-9910-4680-9FF9-10F305B56085@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2404862E-9910-4680-9FF9-10F305B56085@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:57:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had exactly the same reaction when this came up in the past: http://s.apache.org/l9 http://s.apache.org/5Gv but our experience with myriad 0.20 variants has demonstrated that Hadoop can support both a stable branch and a development branch. Trying to direct effort away from 0.20 by preventing it from happening in Apache didn't work, and I was wrong to advocate for it. The interest in a more slow-moving, stable version of Hadoop will exist whether we give it an outlet in Apache or not, most of us work on both anyway, so we might as well collaborate in both fora. -C On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > so if 0.20 becomes 1.0, what does 0.22 become ? > > I'm still not sure if we shouldn't just add security to 0.22, and leave t= he 0.20 in maintenance mode from here on. > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that = it's a big jump? Anything else? >> >> >> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this pat= ch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 branches. Given = that, I think that a new major release number makes the most sense. It is a= lso relatively likely that additional minor releases will be made off of th= is branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.= 0 for a long time and this feels like backing into the decision, but techni= cally, I believe it to be the right name for such a release. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- Owen > > From general-return-2732-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 22:57:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98095 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 22:57:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 22:57:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 91466 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 22:57:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91396 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 22:57:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91388 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 22:57:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:57:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:56:54 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00I3DMDINRA0@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_05:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120149 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:56:05 -0800 Message-id: <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) +1 for 0.20.x, where x >= 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would involve more discussion. Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the branch? Just curious. Cheers, Nige On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. > > Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in the past too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung up on a release number. I just *do not* want a controversy. > > As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; so, I could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. > > I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 is what I'm priming for. > > Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far ahead he is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this hadoop-0.20.200. > > All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our last stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the hands of our users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. > > Arun > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >>> that it's a big jump? Anything else? >> >> >> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this >> patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 >> branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes >> the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor >> releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. >> We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels >> like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be >> the right name for such a release. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- Owen > From general-return-2733-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 23:03:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99558 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 23:03:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 23:03:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 99703 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:03:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99491 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99476 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 23:03:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:03:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:03:02 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so1153533qwh.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.193 with SMTP id kl1mr1400768qcb.114.1294873361826; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:02:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3) Nigel - could we make all the patches in this branch that have not been committed up stream (that need to be) blockers for 22? This way 22 is not a regression against 0.20.x. Thanks, Eli On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1 for 0.20.x, where x >=3D 100. =A0I agree that the 1.0 moniker would in= volve more discussion. > > Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the b= ranch? =A0Just curious. > > Cheers, > Nige > > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. >> >> Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in the = past too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung up on a re= lease number. I just *do not* want a controversy. >> >> As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; so, = I could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. >> >> I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 is= what I'm priming for. >> >> Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far ahead = he is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this hadoop-0.20.200. >> >> All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our la= st stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the hands of o= ur users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. >> >> Arun >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> >>>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >>>> that it's a big jump? Anything else? >>> >>> >>> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this >>> patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 >>> branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes >>> the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor >>> releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. >>> We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels >>> like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be >>> the right name for such a release. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -- Owen >> > > From general-return-2734-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 23:16:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12389 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 23:16:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 23:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 22184 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:15:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22085 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22077 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 23:15:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:15:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:15:51 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00K0UN7X3V10@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:14:22 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_08:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120151 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:14:21 -0800 Message-id: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) > Nigel - could we make all the patches in this branch that have not > been committed up stream (that need to be) blockers for 22? This way > 22 is not a regression against 0.20.x. I sure hope so. May be difficult to untangle if it's a jumbo patch -- answer is in the details of how it's contributed. Cheers, Nige On Jan 12, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > +1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3) > > Nigel - could we make all the patches in this branch that have not > been committed up stream (that need to be) blockers for 22? This way > 22 is not a regression against 0.20.x. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> +1 for 0.20.x, where x >= 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would involve more discussion. >> >> Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the branch? Just curious. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. >>> >>> Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in the past too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung up on a release number. I just *do not* want a controversy. >>> >>> As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; so, I could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. >>> >>> I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 is what I'm priming for. >>> >>> Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far ahead he is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this hadoop-0.20.200. >>> >>> All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our last stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the hands of our users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. >>> >>> Arun >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >>>>> that it's a big jump? Anything else? >>>> >>>> >>>> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this >>>> patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 >>>> branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes >>>> the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor >>>> releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. >>>> We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels >>>> like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be >>>> the right name for such a release. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> -- Owen >>> >> >> From general-return-2735-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 12 23:27:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14730 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2011 23:27:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 23:27:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 38231 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:27:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38153 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2011 23:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38145 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2011 23:27:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:27:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:26:55 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so1175427qwh.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:26:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from :subject:date:to; bh=SbUSq4r5heZe+OPsdQJ4LSTbWE37yeRIiPZg0jzaupE=; b=NR7clcqWjo3F5J0JX1tSYQQO7Tr68AYHiUSIqKnTu4WzsAtUxVk5DTImPHHZKk8dSc IVqkTHPk5axHJDMEgTNu/nRE9ZJDaQIcaDpmqm9sRaDZD84v037xdEKJx4aVSjCisUV7 b2MmKC9oZ6ev4nScUiwR8PVKAgqjkSB5aV1L8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=QY3bbZi+UDXbxn6RuWvDXC06+bb30BhaFJjHofti64UxZHwrgihnjhNFXTyudWEj3f vGq4pAAcd9ykC14QQXVY/PAklQi+kNDFw62I6vaj5UqNjQuHzJZU9QsCU4d0tW7bRL9D wPtdGXxAsBy4f/2hEhJHAwsVr4mv2nEvKjqPc= Received: by 10.224.6.140 with SMTP id 12mr1421691qaz.331.1294874794872; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.1.36] ([12.50.71.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb15sm864308qcb.14.2011.01.12.15.26.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:26:33 -0800 (PST) References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <75282D37-0A3E-4F63-9C6D-C82652615F1C@holsman.net> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:26:28 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So what is the plan with 20.3 that Owen volunteered to RM?=20 Should we do that, or just integrate the security code with that and call it= 20.x? --- Ian Holsman - 703 879-3128 I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free -- Michelangel= o On 12/01/2011, at 6:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > +1 on 0.20.x (where x is a J > 3) >=20 > Nigel - could we make all the patches in this branch that have not > been committed up stream (that need to be) blockers for 22? This way > 22 is not a regression against 0.20.x. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> +1 for 0.20.x, where x >=3D 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would invo= lve more discussion. >>=20 >> Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the b= ranch? Just curious. >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>=20 >>> I'm willing to discuss any and all options, for a very short period. >>>=20 >>> Technically you have a reasonable point, Doug has suggested this in the p= ast too. If everyone agrees, fine; if not, I'm do not want hung up on a rele= ase number. I just *do not* want a controversy. >>>=20 >>> As I mentioned, I'm looking to finish this up in a couple of weeks; so, I= could do without a long discussion on the on the critical path. >>>=20 >>> I'm happy to go with a reasonable compromise, if not, hadoop-0.20.100 is= what I'm priming for. >>>=20 >>> Heck, if Stack wants to call the append release (not sure how far ahead h= e is) as hadoop-0.20.100, I'm willing to call this hadoop-0.20.200. >>>=20 >>> All I care about is having a distinct release number from 0.20.2 (our la= st stable release). Again, I just want to get a release into the hands of ou= r users. Please, let's resolve this quickly. Please. >>>=20 >>> Arun >>>=20 >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show >>>>> that it's a big jump? Anything else? >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this >>>> patch set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 >>>> branches. Given that, I think that a new major release number makes >>>> the most sense. It is also relatively likely that additional minor >>>> releases will be made off of this branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. >>>> We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for a long time and this feels >>>> like backing into the decision, but technically, I believe it to be >>>> the right name for such a release. >>>>=20 >>>> Thoughts? >>>>=20 >>>> -- Owen >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2736-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 00:34:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47973 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 00:34:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 00:34:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 17191 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 00:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17101 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 00:34:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17093 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 00:34:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:34:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:34:36 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00CRVQWKRO70@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:33:57 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-12_08:2011-01-12,2011-01-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120169 Subject: triggering automated precommit testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:33:55 -0800 Message-id: References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: > ---------------------------------- > >> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue number. > > That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the triggering mechanism had to change. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2737-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 00:41:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49106 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 00:41:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 00:41:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 19449 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 00:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19391 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 00:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19383 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 00:41:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:41:42 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so516984gyf.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cmsgGY2sOa8pA/6dsfmWcIi/Yp/MSELvfGVLB2JWazE=; b=gamsb/6PhDk9dD6qHplYRUjZqrn6r/Q+MM4x/VsP1BqxROg7qcIt2KIaRG3fDbDT7K H/gsHQKeOtPdLJqcmqF+F8q++Oorgc+0a8gSCcC4LlQ5tJ0C8XYynqI6AiVt0jjxJDpm LA0tmK0QeicfJ786AECIoPZCMp4mgXdvKiGu0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YUMOisM4PQc7rVfzkx4nD10dcoSdJfCI3/aFJmXeR2tckd2hSy7Yn7gRR0x044s61j rOALHP1CyvGplu48zWhk+7zDmAhwgENa7daG1koHFKoQq23nxoCxKyIQQqJ5Or87OcIl zBYLUk52Z3J1SOPC73Wcdn+DwUZcjpFXlxrXA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.108.145 with SMTP id q17mr3522035yhg.70.1294879281148; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.228 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a53e9473610499af9312 --90e6ba53a53e9473610499af9312 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? --Konstantin On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: > > ---------------------------------- > > > >> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no > longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must > upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// > hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue > number. > > > > That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? > > [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] > > Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy > The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on > watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch > Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the > triggering mechanism had to change. > > Cheers, > Nige > --90e6ba53a53e9473610499af9312-- From general-return-2738-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 01:13:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66770 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 01:13:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 01:13:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 55305 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:13:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55241 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55233 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 01:13:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:13:22 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_VCVJlt22Mg0kt5Ik3EEI5g)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00BDTSPLMR90@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:12:58 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-13_01:2011-01-12,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120176 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:12:57 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> Message-id: <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_VCVJlt22Mg0kt5Ik3EEI5g) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I believe ommitters can gain access following this: http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. Nige On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? > --Konstantin > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>> ---------------------------------- >>> >>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must >> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >> number. >>> >>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >> >> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >> >> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on >> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the >> triggering mechanism had to change. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> --Boundary_(ID_VCVJlt22Mg0kt5Ik3EEI5g)-- From general-return-2739-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 01:19:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68145 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 01:19:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 01:19:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 59954 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:19:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59871 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59863 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 01:19:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:19:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:19:18 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1245427qyk.14 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:18:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=XITzQnAqmOl9mZATozosLXxl725BGrRHFt3KAfftXhI=; b=UANdBZh1yWqiLymw4XN8TDWUWNgNYyUcw9tvegef0dHMgZkFQaVycR4FT12TLFeUgj Mcplh14kLpFEqRk1q9XbAnGTYpeR1xQbq0Tynk5u5zgfgJcIRK/9YVJiiaaISw6pm06d SAvlaexFsDAD8Qp5sXU1AhXHmSvcqStoGpn8Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=U3XfgmYdoZajuJBdPbOXJ95LmsFIppilzXi6VFU5QIOaG1jbjGkSlfhpOocJ1N8ck6 vF3eXwY97LQyht7SU5RX8njGJ1r/g59kQJIAQUnjkO9KIiPG1rPUOBKKv/NI5TyRLZQ2 j7HKxipTiztp3LrX7F6rrwjhJte8T2bVm2m30= Received: by 10.224.29.20 with SMTP id o20mr1495523qac.377.1294881536345; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:18:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from 12-50-71-176.att-inc.com ([12.50.71.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb15sm940074qcb.2.2011.01.12.17.18.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:18:55 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:18:39 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org and done. anybody else want access? On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I believe ommitters can gain access following this: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account > Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >=20 > Nige >=20 > On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >=20 >> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >> --Konstantin >>=20 >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>=20 >>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this = you no >>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you = must >>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the = issue >>> number. >>>>=20 >>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>>=20 >>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>=20 >>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer = relies on >>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into = Patch >>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, = thus the >>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-2740-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 01:26:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69633 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 01:26:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 01:26:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 69733 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69688 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:26:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69680 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 01:26:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:26:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:26:01 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1195787iwn.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:25:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iRotsibnHiS0frglpRnYymh1uY5FVdEltsUtQpCrlpA=; b=prBueZrzouU68jv1AvaIjE56CnJZFxgAwomf13xILN/cb6877zwExdfN+MHtNn4bhr qwWaq12nK/RNfsVWRqBmzHpD/yTuUwDFGgSFputJx76Hnu9y5t4P2Iow6Zny6hmCt4fI sA9QipH/2Zr4BygSjfUYkDVnXBuR1tuoaGxtQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hbd/AtetvOd3XxOSOWMWtEg1hh5LnXBI6JfhtJWY2w8dm66qYF35I8KANUdhcnXpkI nenFD+Cql9Gq8jqsmGY9sP+aqkMhkeuqDoOlVhRd/t7NQQSP0WRaB8SdbRDrHhJoO8Y0 u0eE5HwAnwMzo5kBnTR+prdHFPjxX+u85MXqQ= Received: by 10.231.36.12 with SMTP id r12mr1808884ibd.69.1294881940220; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:25:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:25:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> From: Jakob Homan Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:25:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org yes, please. On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > and done. > anybody else want access? > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >> >> Nige >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> >>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>> --Konstantin >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you = no >>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you m= ust >>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>>> number. >>>>> >>>>> That makes me sad. =A0Is this a new feature or regression? >>>> >>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>> >>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies= on >>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Pat= ch >>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, th= us the >>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>> >> > > From general-return-2741-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 01:44:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72801 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 01:44:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 01:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 83201 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83144 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 01:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83136 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 01:43:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:43:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:43:49 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX00MZ8U4EZV60@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:43:27 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-13_01:2011-01-12,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120180 Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:43:26 -0800 Message-id: <00A700DF-3485-4289-AC11-EDDBD5EC8769@mac.com> References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Updated w/ Owen's suggestions. Feel free to tweak further. Cheers, Nige On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> >> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if someone >>>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >>> >>> Ok, I'll work on a page. >> >> Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html >> Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the subscription instructions (it's a new page). > > I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: > > user questions: > common-user > hdfs-user > mapreduce-user > security - only for notifying the project of security vulnerabilities > > project level announcements and discussions: > general > > developer questions: > common-dev > hdfs-dev > mapreduce-dev > > jira and subversion tracking for developers: > common-issues > common-commits > hdfs-issues > hdfs-commits > > mapreduce-issues > mapreduce-commits > > -- Owen From general-return-2742-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 02:30:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91834 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 02:30:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 02:30:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 32776 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 02:30:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32655 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 02:30:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32647 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 02:30:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:30:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:29:55 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1305557wye.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:29:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr1411182wel.104.1294885772861; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:29:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:29:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:29:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ma7lQhafuKs2AbQylaXdxLNwTXE Message-ID: Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Me too, please. -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 17:18, Ian Holsman wrote: > and done. > anybody else want access? > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >> >> Nige >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >> >>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>> --Konstantin >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you = no >>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you m= ust >>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>>> number. >>>>> >>>>> That makes me sad. =A0Is this a new feature or regression? >>>> >>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>> >>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies= on >>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Pat= ch >>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, th= us the >>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>> >> > > From general-return-2743-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 02:34:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93003 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 02:34:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 02:34:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 39400 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 02:34:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39182 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 02:34:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39174 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 02:34:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:34:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:34:30 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEX006E6WGDXUG2@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:33:50 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-13_01:2011-01-12,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120182 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [0.22] Removed all non-blockers/non-critical from 0.22 in Jira Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:33:49 -0800 Message-id: <4A527256-DEB3-4405-9F3C-A682110FF861@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Folks, I have updated Jira to remove "Fix In" 0.22 from all non-blockers and non-critical issues across common, hdfs, and mapreduce. If you're wondering what used to be marked for 0.22, I put them in this spreadsheet for your reference (there is one sheet for each of the projects): https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AjXiUl01876EdDM5YlNHRWtDbUFxS2tYSnd5SFZGSnc&hl=en ***If you now mark an issue for 0.22, please set it's priority as accurately as possible (preferably blocker or critical only) and provide a rationale on why it needs to be in 0.22.*** Our next goal is to fix blockers so we can post a release candidate. Cheers, Nige From general-return-2744-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 06:11:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89020 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 06:11:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 06:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68251 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 06:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67937 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 06:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67850 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 06:11:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:11:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:11:04 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so496199vws.35 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:10:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=RYmQNL600ZZApJcvjB8Cq/r20pTVldzrl5whR8FYHkw=; b=BErVMn6Y/cCkdV3ZkZcfO90VBaZ1LZ1x12RewZQGZpH+WjFCP+XEhXN5otyjcFFMQL /Kps+N3DuCr+taKZuMaZ41WOD2su5lWC2ExwYX0FkyrrkzfgAP8zzk2SyqWdKTzzkfWq CM0xdjMyOZI34J0sA2WJEFPOBSstJ0FDN9R8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=UthaRS5L0d+utaU65tG6IewikYCldVp8WC3dn5FO8ZmTkNiWZt5+wZc46fat8t0/ui 8M9L3eIW0g8arkUBpnh4j5v2akAV7R5WqLFuadYTpNp9ATDm2l3ys6DUNmTtNYiqI/Qr BwZg4kz26WYwDKacCWuXSLez2bqgYBUa3GDUM= Received: by 10.220.193.198 with SMTP id dv6mr489626vcb.84.1294899041637; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:10:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from 12-50-71-176.att-inc.com ([12.50.71.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14sm353804vcx.23.2011.01.12.22.10.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:10:40 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:10:36 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <10406582-12B3-4774-90EE-3032D686B32B@Holsman.NET> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> <627F5E4D-DBDC-49BF-A94A-D30BB4FE7F9A@mac.com> <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) done.. (for both cos & jghoman). regards Ian On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Me too, please. > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 17:18, Ian Holsman wrote: >> and done. >> anybody else want access? >>=20 >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >>> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >>>=20 >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>>=20 >>>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>>> --Konstantin >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this = you no >>>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, = you must >>>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can = kickhttps:// >>>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the = issue >>>>> number. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>>>>=20 >>>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>>>=20 >>>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer = relies on >>>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into = Patch >>>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira = API, thus the >>>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2745-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 07:08:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27983 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 07:08:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 07:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 48360 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 07:08:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47981 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 07:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47973 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 07:08:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:08:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c177.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.177]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0D77VfK075376 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:07:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294902451; bh=6bVVYX/0ursYimDHNVw2av16wTBdV/qtSqc1IloP8hM=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=Q1Q31LQNIxU+pKb5XiaIB+Na4vazDnnj5GCbZvEPBEsMS/jy+AjB5LF46TCoOsUCF rpFUs03fh5uVYorVecUX+m84XoEQkqs/h7tC256WrKnEpggolljzKLht0dLllP/slG yuljo2ugxh15+gEfAKCAISRUWnJ9DXFEGJXsSWt8= Message-Id: <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-61-915155131 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:07:31 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-61-915155131 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1 for 0.20.x, where x >= 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would > involve more discussion. Ok, seems like we are converging; we can continue talking. I've created the branch to get the ball rolling. > Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to > the branch? Just curious. I'm afraid that the svn log of the branch from github Y! branch is fairly useless since a single JIRA might have multiple commits in the Y! branch (bugfix on top of a bugfix). We have done that in several cases (but the patches committed to trunk have a single patch which is the result of forward porting a complete feature/bugfix). IAC the this branch and 0.22 have diverged so much that almost no non-trivial patch would apply without a significant amount of work. Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this can done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and beyond. However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced in the CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of the release. This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this ensures that we can track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to brainstorm. thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-61-915155131-- From general-return-2746-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 07:10:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28475 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 07:10:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 07:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 51063 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 07:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50980 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 07:10:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50966 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 07:10:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:10:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:10:08 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_XSzzMLC15lA3s4HuMDtA9g)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LEY008VT98A9CW2@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:09:48 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-13_04:2011-01-13,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101120213 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:09:46 -0800 In-reply-to: <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> Message-id: <80C17BAC-A8EA-43A8-8243-87D7BBBB2578@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_XSzzMLC15lA3s4HuMDtA9g) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT On Jan 12, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> +1 for 0.20.x, where x >= 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would involve more discussion. > > Ok, seems like we are converging; we can continue talking. I've created the branch to get the ball rolling. > >> Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the branch? Just curious. > > I'm afraid that the svn log of the branch from github Y! branch is fairly useless since a single JIRA might have multiple commits in the Y! branch (bugfix on top of a bugfix). We have done that in several cases (but the patches committed to trunk have a single patch which is the result of forward porting a complete feature/bugfix). IAC the this branch and 0.22 have diverged so much that almost no non-trivial patch would apply without a significant amount of work. > > Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this can done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and beyond. > > However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced in the CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of the release. This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this ensures that we can track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. > > Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to brainstorm. +1. If it turns out to be insufficient to figure out how to apply similar changes to trunk/0.22 then we can address that as needed. Thanks Arun! Nige --Boundary_(ID_XSzzMLC15lA3s4HuMDtA9g)-- From general-return-2747-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 08:52:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64399 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 08:52:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 08:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60964 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 08:52:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60560 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 08:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60545 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 08:52:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:52:43 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0D8q4bd005828 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:52:04 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:51:57 -0800 Subject: Re: email lists: too many or not enough? Thread-Topic: email lists: too many or not enough? Thread-Index: Acuy/yajSdjEpkZsRJqh6S/Wbg6cUw== Message-ID: References: <8C43652C-3B79-4583-B69E-C735B0084F10@yahoo-inc.com> <93FCAFF3-8F8F-4BD5-8A46-60771D6CDE6C@mac.com> <4F749041-9774-4968-AE2C-52977651148A@mac.com> <00A700DF-3485-4289-AC11-EDDBD5EC8769@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <00A700DF-3485-4289-AC11-EDDBD5EC8769@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Much improved. Thanks! PS please keep branch discussions here.=20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:44 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > Updated w/ Owen's suggestions. Feel free to tweak further. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >>>>> We do try to move the questions off of general. It would be great if = someone >>>>> updated the website with the intended usage of each of the lists. >>>>=20 >>>> Ok, I'll work on a page. >>>=20 >>> Done. See the revamped http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html >>> Corrections welcome. You must now click on general@ to see the subscri= ption instructions (it's a new page). >>=20 >> I'd suggest segregating the list into 4 tables based on audience: >>=20 >> user questions: >> common-user >> hdfs-user >> mapreduce-user >> security - only for notifying the project of security vulnerabilities >>=20 >> project level announcements and discussions: >> general >>=20 >> developer questions: >> common-dev >> hdfs-dev >> mapreduce-dev >>=20 >> jira and subversion tracking for developers: >> common-issues >> common-commits >> hdfs-issues >> hdfs-commits >>=20 >> mapreduce-issues >> mapreduce-commits >>=20 >> -- Owen >=20 From general-return-2748-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 20:23:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90295 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 20:23:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 20:23:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 39388 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 20:23:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39313 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 20:23:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39300 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 20:23:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:23:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:23:16 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0DKM1Hx071751 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:22:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294950122; bh=8Tw370nkFcFcRybSIPkmzUUdmNGzr+KXEqHljqC25A4=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=jRG0my3RRSHihiQoHiZNxizMs8xiw06UmAmEDBwsvA6BJbTAzpIOo+ZmKY6PHhu5r FL9mIKMKhC4mKBGGtyuxle1Ebo9Zfi5nAjDGCk8CSAI4ZUT3/Rj2wycSbUlI5oznWF FaIor+pUEE6TNDMTlNHM3tQRCO5Ne8yzcZXfqsOw= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:22:00 -0800 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:21:58 -0800 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing Thread-Topic: triggering automated precommit testing Thread-Index: Acuyv/HwLK2LT3iyQBSQT0pewK0EAAAn5Urb Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8A0FD462-3DEB-498C-9713-9024583983EF@Holsman.NET> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9549EE62E6A1sureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9549EE62E6A1sureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please add me... On 1/12/11 5:18 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: and done. anybody else want access? On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > I believe ommitters can gain access following this: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account > Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. > > Nige > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > >> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >> --Konstantin >> >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you n= o >>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you mu= st >>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>> number. >>>> >>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>> >>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>> >>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies = on >>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patc= h >>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thu= s the >>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>> > --_000_C9549EE62E6A1sureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2749-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 22:05:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59223 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 22:05:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 22:05:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 74236 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 22:05:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73890 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 22:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73876 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 22:05:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:05:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:05:16 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2192408iwn.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.199.196 with SMTP id et4mr2976799ibb.71.1294956295444; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:04:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:04:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:04:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba53a4f4fd5fd40499c181e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba53a4f4fd5fd40499c181e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Arun, all, When we merged YDH and CDH for CDH3b3, we went through the effort of "linearizing" all of the YDH patches and squashing multiple commits into single ones corresponding to a single JIRA where possible. So, we have a 100% linear set of patches that applies on top of the 0.20.2 source tree and includes Yahoo 0.20.100.3 as well as almost all the patches from 0.20-append and a number of other backports. Since this could be applied as a linear set of patches instead of a big lump, would there be interest in using this as the 0.20.>100 Apache release? I can take the time to remove any patches that are cloudera specific or not yet applied upstream. Thanks -Todd On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > +1 for 0.20.x, where x >= 100. I agree that the 1.0 moniker would involve >> more discussion. >> > > Ok, seems like we are converging; we can continue talking. I've created the > branch to get the ball rolling. > > > Will this be a jumbo patch attached to a Jira and then committed to the >> branch? Just curious. >> > > I'm afraid that the svn log of the branch from github Y! branch is fairly > useless since a single JIRA might have multiple commits in the Y! branch > (bugfix on top of a bugfix). We have done that in several cases (but the > patches committed to trunk have a single patch which is the result of > forward porting a complete feature/bugfix). IAC the this branch and 0.22 > have diverged so much that almost no non-trivial patch would apply without a > significant amount of work. > > Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this can > done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and beyond. > > However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced in the > CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of the release. > This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this ensures that we can > track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. > > Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to brainstorm. > > thanks, > Arun > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba53a4f4fd5fd40499c181e1-- From general-return-2750-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 23:05:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9181 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 23:05:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 23:05:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 75304 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 23:05:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75113 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 23:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75105 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 23:05:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:05:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:05:48 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0DN54XN047861 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:05:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294959904; bh=+OqBxBUo8AXRb6bYaiWKPynUlYjHIKajMM2+KfBwNrs=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=WODVXOlU/jyTZ+myXoQWAdVOd4RzpS14aS7Fo96c9NzqPDbEoYCEuTkA8wlwn2j/Q BbN+Srme2tkONzEA6d1GiywHVaY1XkfxhFYU2BSmQUw3UayaVzod4eT1SjPrP1W4CU ZIRWjj6jtAgjkRC7Sh6gj8K2/+Z5a8K48MAFo3wk= Message-Id: <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:05:04 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd, On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Arun, all, > > When we merged YDH and CDH for CDH3b3, we went through the effort of > "linearizing" all of the YDH patches and squashing multiple commits > into > single ones corresponding to a single JIRA where possible. So, we > have a > 100% linear set of patches that applies on top of the 0.20.2 source > tree and > includes Yahoo 0.20.100.3 as well as almost all the patches from > 0.20-append > and a number of other backports. > > Since this could be applied as a linear set of patches instead of a > big > lump, would there be interest in using this as the 0.20.>100 Apache > release? > I can take the time to remove any patches that are cloudera specific > or not > yet applied upstream. > Interesting discussion, thanks. I'm sure it took you a fair amount of work to squash patches (which I tried too, btw). That, plus the fact that we would need to do a similar amount of work for the 10 or so releases we have done after 0.20.100.3 scares me. As we Nigel and I discussed here, the jumbo patch and an up-to-date CHANGES.txt provides almost all of the benefits we seek and allows all of us to get this done very quickly to focus on hadoop-0.22 and beyond. What do you think? OTOH, I could get this release done and start squashing patches for the sake of completeness as a background activity. Thoughts? thanks, Arun From general-return-2751-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 13 23:39:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37834 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2011 23:39:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2011 23:39:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22102 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 23:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22041 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2011 23:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22033 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2011 23:39:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:39:05 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2260721iwn.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.4 with SMTP id r4mr8358ibr.146.1294961924309; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:38:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:34:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:34:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532ca287f036f0499c2d19e --00221532ca287f036f0499c2d19e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Since this could be applied as a linear set of patches instead of a big >> lump, would there be interest in using this as the 0.20.>100 Apache >> release? >> I can take the time to remove any patches that are cloudera specific or >> not >> yet applied upstream. >> >> > Interesting discussion, thanks. > > I'm sure it took you a fair amount of work to squash patches (which I tried > too, btw). Yep, I had a great summer ;-) > That, plus the fact that we would need to do a similar amount of work for > the 10 or so releases we have done after 0.20.100.3 scares me. > Sorry, I actually meant 0.20.104.3. Have there been many releases since then? That's the last version available on the Yahoo github, and that's the version we incorporated/linearized. If there is a large sequence of patches after this that you're planning on including, it would be good to see them in your git repo. > As we Nigel and I discussed here, the jumbo patch and an up-to-date > CHANGES.txt provides almost all of the benefits we seek and allows all of us > to get this done very quickly to focus on hadoop-0.22 and beyond. > > In my opinion here are the downsides to this plan: - a mondo "merge" patch is a big pain when trying to do debugging. It may be sufficient for a user to look at CHANGES.txt, but I find myself using blame/log/etc on individual files to understand code lineage on a daily basis. If all of the merge shows up as a big patch it will be very difficult (at least the way I work with code) to help users debug issues or understand which JIRA a certain regression may have come from. - CHANGES.txt traditionally doesn't reference which patch file from a JIRA was checked in. So we may know that a given JIRA has been included, but often there are several revisions of patches on the JIRA and it's difficult to be sure that we have the most up-to-date version. By looking at change history it's usually easy to pick this out, but if it's one giant patch apply, this isn't possible. - the proposal to use the YDH distro certainly solves the Security issue, but doesn't help out HBase at all. Given HBase has been asking for a long time to get a real release of the append branch, I think it would be better to have one 20-based release which has both of these features, rather than further fragmenting the community into 0.20.2, 0.20.2+security, 0.20.2+append. I think the first two points could be addressed if you push your git tree either to github or an apache-hosted git, and then include in SVN as a mondo patch. It's not ideal, but at least when trying to debug issues and understand the history of this branch there will be a publicly available change history to reference. To clarify my position a bit here - I definitely appreciate your volunteering to do the work, and wouldn't *block* the proposal as you've put it forth. I just think it will have limited utility for the community by being opaque (if contributed as a giant patch) and by not including the sync feature which is critical for a large segment of users. Given those downsides I'd rather see the effort diverted towards making a killer 0.22 release that we can all jump on. Thanks -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00221532ca287f036f0499c2d19e-- From general-return-2752-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 00:04:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46737 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 00:04:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 00:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 48155 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 00:04:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48086 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 00:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48078 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 00:04:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:04:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chenqibj@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.31.142 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.31.142] (HELO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:03:53 +0000 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.245]) by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0E03Vmj004362 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:03:31 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p0E03V912134148 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:03:31 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p0E03UU0022653 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:03:30 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p0E03Unr022611 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:03:30 +1100 Subject: Keith is on vacation Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Qi BJ Chen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:03:29 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 01/14/2011 08:03:30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBF28BDF93D77F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF28BDF93D77F" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=C7BBF28BDF93D77F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF28BDF93D77F Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2011-01-14 and will not return until 2011-01-22. During this time, I won't access my email. --0__=C7BBF28BDF93D77F8f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBF28BDF93D77F-- From general-return-2753-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 00:59:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87699 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 00:59:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 00:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1500 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 00:59:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1450 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 00:59:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1442 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 00:59:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:59:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:59:06 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E0wYHp056778 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:58:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294966714; bh=X3W5ZfMJn2uaSRa3ZOYXciLVaHEF2fpvxoIQMASuhWU=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=k5I7vpOMUW2ZYYU/mLvR2EYZR0ERQIRpUI9GwP1nQB1OPqoaxsU/cMsnImMiRXuBB MC2u+Kdu/GqufJoFAoQzazm1ZvwsCu/ydXx85QZx6ncXHmz8IJgGLPZGBu/Ud57kHW v30wCSdjD/PBssY64nsqOYjiqMs6q8M3JXxiT9JQ= Message-Id: <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:58:34 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > >> Since this could be applied as a linear set of patches instead of a >> big >>> lump, would there be interest in using this as the 0.20.>100 Apache >>> release? >>> I can take the time to remove any patches that are cloudera >>> specific or >>> not >>> yet applied upstream. >>> >>> >> Interesting discussion, thanks. >> >> I'm sure it took you a fair amount of work to squash patches (which >> I tried >> too, btw). > > > Yep, I had a great summer ;-) > > >> That, plus the fact that we would need to do a similar amount of >> work for >> the 10 or so releases we have done after 0.20.100.3 scares me. >> > > Sorry, I actually meant 0.20.104.3. Have there been many releases > since > then? That's the last version available on the Yahoo github, and > that's the > version we incorporated/linearized. Yep. I had a great summer! ;-) >> >> As we Nigel and I discussed here, the jumbo patch and an up-to-date >> CHANGES.txt provides almost all of the benefits we seek and allows >> all of us >> to get this done very quickly to focus on hadoop-0.22 and beyond. >> >> > In my opinion here are the downsides to this plan: > I agree there are downsides, I think I did point them out at the outset! :) > - a mondo "merge" patch is a big pain when trying to do debugging. > It may be > sufficient for a user to look at CHANGES.txt, but I find myself using > blame/log/etc on individual files to understand code lineage on a > daily > basis. If all of the merge shows up as a big patch it will be very > difficult > (at least the way I work with code) to help users debug issues or > understand > which JIRA a certain regression may have come from. > Right, no question. Which is why I offered to do this as a background activity right after... this ensures that the source of truth is *always* a branch in Apache subversion. I feel that we could get a usable release out of door quickly for our users. Also, please remember that almost every patch we have committed is available on relevant jiras. I understand the devs have a problem and I feel we can bear with it for a little while. Again, I agree this isn't an ideal solution, I'm just trying to expedite the release for the users. > > To clarify my position a bit here - I definitely appreciate your > volunteering to do the work, and wouldn't *block* the proposal as > you've put > it forth. I just think it will have limited utility for the > community by > being opaque (if contributed as a giant patch) and by not including > the sync > feature which is critical for a large segment of users. Given those > downsides I'd rather see the effort diverted towards making a killer > 0.22 > release that we can all jump on. > Thanks for understanding. Again, I completely agree this isn't an ideal situation, but I do hope it has a bit more than *limited utility* for our end-users. Who knows, I maybe hopelessly deluded! *smile* Also, I'm trying to do exactly what you suggested - spend very little time on this so that everyone, including me, can focus on the future. thanks, Arun From general-return-2754-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 01:35:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7274 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 01:35:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 01:35:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 36618 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 01:35:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36557 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 01:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36549 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 01:35:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 01:35:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 01:35:35 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so846559vws.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:35:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.14 with SMTP id ki14mr159778qcb.120.1294968913763; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:35:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:35:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eli Collins To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, January 13, 2011, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > Since this could be applied as a linear set of patches instead of a big > > lump, would there be interest in using this as the 0.20.>100 Apache > release? > I can take the time to remove any patches that are cloudera specific or > not > yet applied upstream. > > > > Interesting discussion, thanks. > > I'm sure it took you a fair amount of work to squash patches (which I tri= ed > too, btw). > > > > Yep, I had a great summer ;-) > > > > That, plus the fact that we would need to do a similar amount of work for > the 10 or so releases we have done after 0.20.100.3 scares me. > > > > Sorry, I actually meant 0.20.104.3. Have there been many releases since > then? That's the last version available on the Yahoo github, and that's t= he > version we incorporated/linearized. > > > Yep. I had a great summer! ;-) > > > > As we Nigel and I discussed here, the jumbo =A0patch and an up-to-date > CHANGES.txt provides almost all of the benefits we seek and allows all of= us > to get this done very quickly to focus on hadoop-0.22 and beyond. > > > > In my opinion here are the downsides to this plan: > > > > I agree there are downsides, I think I did point them out at the outset! = :) > > > - a mondo "merge" patch is a big pain when trying to do debugging. It may= be > sufficient for a user to look at CHANGES.txt, but I find myself using > blame/log/etc on individual files to understand code lineage on a daily > basis. If all of the merge shows up as a big patch it will be very diffic= ult > (at least the way I work with code) to help users debug issues or underst= and > which JIRA a certain regression may have come from. > > > > Right, no question. Which is why I offered to do this as a background act= ivity right after... this ensures that the source of truth is *always* a br= anch in Apache subversion. > > I feel that we could get a usable release out of door quickly for our use= rs. Also, please remember that almost every patch we have committed is avai= lable on relevant jiras. I understand the devs have a problem and I feel we= can bear with it for a little while. Again, I agree this isn't an ideal so= lution, I'm just trying to expedite the release for the users. > > > > To clarify my position a bit here - I definitely appreciate your > volunteering to do the work, and wouldn't *block* the proposal as you've = put > it forth. I just think it will have limited utility for the community by > being opaque (if contributed as a giant patch) and by not including the s= ync > feature which is critical for a large segment of users. Given those > downsides I'd rather see the effort diverted towards making a killer 0.22 > release that we can all jump on. > > > > Thanks for understanding. > > Again, I completely agree this isn't an ideal situation, but I do hope it= has a bit more than *limited utility* for our end-users. Who knows, I mayb= e hopelessly deluded! *smile* > > Also, I'm trying to do exactly what you suggested - spend very little tim= e on this so that everyone, including me, can focus on the future. > > thanks, > Arun > Given that Todd has already done the work to rebase the 0.20.104.3 patch set on 0.20.2, and in a way that doesn't require one big change, and his patch set includes branch20-append which the HBase guys want an Apache release of wouldn't it make sense to go this route? What do others think? Seems better to have one 0.20.100 release than multiple ones for security and append. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2755-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 02:13:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23356 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 02:13:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 02:13:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 68181 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 02:13:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68129 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 02:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68121 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 02:13:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:13:13 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E2CW8L018122 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:12:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294971152; bh=NUaSkJ32IHp7gG5Z1vequBMQ7gUYiJOqjrmeyisD+eA=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=qGFwJc/+W+5h8nd9zI9Zmr1YvrtreVQ9qOoQTEKgAst4qGN9J/8AFJVkK5KE4eU0Y OoK/O5dgoD21N1idRcFei6SPUgGPnroKR2hWR010xOTPXQpIP3kVB/YfR4Xu/omoOo pNQ+7RdIrP3+7ypwPkbSWtrB2ta4zH0/ELDjlatM= Message-Id: <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:12:32 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Given that Todd has already done the work to rebase the 0.20.104.3 > patch set on 0.20.2, and in a way that doesn't require one big change, > and his patch set includes branch20-append which the HBase guys want > an Apache release of wouldn't it make sense to go this route? What do > others think? Seems better to have one 0.20.100 release than multiple > ones for security and append. My concern around 0.20.104.3 is that it has serious security holes including a root exploit that we have since fixed. I'm sure you guys are aware of them, Todd has helped to fix some. The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of them, *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes we have done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle tested and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty sure *some* users will find that valuable. ;) Also, I've offered to push individual patches as a background activity on a branch - that should suffice, no? Or, do you consider this a blocker? Again, my goal in this exercise is to get a stable, improved version of Hadoop into the hands of our users asap, and focus on 0.22 and beyond. thanks, Arun From general-return-2756-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 02:50:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33483 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 02:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 02:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 92184 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 02:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91968 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 02:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91959 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 02:50:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:50:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:50:37 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so5706945qyk.14 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:50:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.247.68 with SMTP id mb4mr171361qcb.294.1294973415842; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:50:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:50:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> Given that Todd has already done the work to rebase the 0.20.104.3 >> patch set on 0.20.2, and in a way that doesn't require one big change, >> and his patch set includes branch20-append which the HBase guys want >> an Apache release of wouldn't it make sense to go this route? =A0What do >> others think? Seems better to have one 0.20.100 release than multiple >> ones for security and append. > > > My concern around 0.20.104.3 is that it has serious security holes includ= ing > a root exploit that we have since fixed. I'm sure you guys are aware of > them, Todd has helped to fix some. > The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? > The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of them, > *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes we ha= ve > done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle tested > and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a > significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty sur= e > *some* users will find that valuable. ;) Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instead of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't have to choose. > Also, I've offered to push individual patches as a background activity on= a > branch - that should suffice, no? Or, do you consider this a blocker? Definitely not a blocker. > Again, my goal in this exercise is to get a stable, improved version of > Hadoop into the hands of our users asap, and focus on 0.22 and beyond. Agree, that's everyone's goal. My point is that a release that's already been re-based on 20.2, doesn't require a separate HBase release, and doesn't require you spend time on a background task to break up the big change into smaller ones seems like a faster way forward. Thanks, Eli From general-return-2757-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 04:23:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77528 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 04:23:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 04:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 55123 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 04:23:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54816 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 04:23:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54808 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 04:23:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:23:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:23:37 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E4N3ro051002 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:23:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294978983; bh=26qvGzxe6kC5zqrGRZ+CBRwxAG0cM/6y0RDoXqvDx90=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=HIGVTy8CtMlQWlZMnnRtwaSTxdV8olpfkrzNaOv2lXgIvTEEJelfS2hu5UaTX8FEQ uFRpJQawWAKR3Mrm8ydHGJRatPqsSXRaE/1BI1MhPsJERn66Tw2pRYKDEpVsLnBLhL yFApcH2IkTyD/M7GQRJyT4LzeRxcXpXZimScOzdQ= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-78-991687224 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:23:03 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-78-991687224 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's > 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the > performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least > the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). > > Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on > github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set > (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and > Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? > I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since 20.104.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work on stability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users from taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, unfortunately the delta is pretty large. I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. bug-fixes and enhancements. >> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of >> them, >> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes >> we have >> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle >> tested >> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a >> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm >> pretty sure >> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) > > Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instead > of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could > have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't > have to choose. > We are discussing two options: 20 + security + enhancements 20 + security + append I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is that it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging 6 months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on 0.22. I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely because I don't have to spend cycles testing it. Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... Arun --Apple-Mail-78-991687224-- From general-return-2758-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 04:59:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84156 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 04:59:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 04:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 72482 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 04:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72107 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 04:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72099 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 04:59:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:59:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.206] (HELO nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:59:12 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 04:58:50 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.143] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 04:58:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 04:58:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 671344.32362.bm@omp1026.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 42460 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2011 04:58:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294981130; bh=GQRoeyU9v+peFJ8WnufIv6Iz2igzmlT6TwkD1dQTQcw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zagABAZByTcFgPGCYKxO+zgoaHe6eIGzqr83JHreeK8uES10mEBJWB6958D2Pci6anEuPJABLzyuQzhTrEdGfldYC2ckNZjIQdZWxqFQWw0H+QgFKgIkoz3FDB1pIHxnx0oxZonx6hDpqEWaulITYkd0M1LQieO/5mSe4C7HwbE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=myk5NlJZ3ZBKuIoSH52nHPCFzY02WklK6xVdWSEqmCXcGvbzgLNzpgmw2QVandN8yjyu5WP5yR35PYhbZJqubB/bhFPax5fjCTqYJFWGaijdCXzrXi4gkRgpEFZqEVMSNdzjndh8yl98ia5COgHT+5XfAJOfqQDPpbUYobAFils=; Message-ID: <533709.42262.qm@web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CWFoATgVM1l9M1goX.H6wdJ024C1PTYdMtykIY3Yj2slCwK _wVOdy5zhEgUWafjO_75JRMRi51KbbHXZkavv4Qu7FNZBH266YYQCIlL4V.X fsxyD6KpMHViAYx_delIhmiLKjte0_e8ADfB1jHyqp68VEPg2J8RLMvMucj_ KB3jjd.J_kU_MkiID7jmRhmqC1g7PhnquCH0M.Ojxj_hOx8Cfd6CeUTwxEAQ bu_729jKlFONwQt7Jn5qve.M5H7U9zR4ZbQKTIMtgGv3tygKFo5mi7yUOscE XUGI3pqj9BOKM2ytVe2w6NrTQ7ZPOtHMeYdrKIYy7.2HNUunbOMCBbeQcKf6 9X2RWS2OL Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56201.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:58:50 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:58:50 -0800 (PST) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-830671904-1294981130=:42262" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-830671904-1294981130=:42262 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Below are copied from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html. Not sure if it helps. What power does the RM yield? Regarding what makes it into a release, the RM is the unquestioned authority. No one can contest what makes it into the release. The community will judge the release's quality after it has been issued, but the community can not force the RM to include a feature that they feel uncomfortable adding. Remember that this document is only a guideline to the community and future RMs - each RM may run a release in a different way. If you don't like what an RM is doing, start preparing for your own competing release. Nicholas --0-830671904-1294981130=:42262-- From general-return-2759-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 05:12:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94673 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 05:12:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 05:12:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 80776 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 05:12:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80451 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 05:12:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80443 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 05:12:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:12:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:11:53 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E5BKAi030003 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:11:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.76.23) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:11:19 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:11:16 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Eli, Thanks for the suggestion. +1 to nigel and arun's proposal. I completely support the idea of creating a version of 20 with append = for HBASE. However, the append issue is very complicated and there does = not exist any version of append that is certified against a workload as = diverse as what this branch has been tested against. I think you are = trying to cross too many streams here. If you have resources to help = integrate any version of Hadoop 0.20 with append, package and test it, I = fully support you doing so. But that effort is not aligned with the = goal of this branch, which is to share a substantial amount of fully = integrated and tested work. Members of the community have expressed = interest in seeing this tested work get checked into Apache and I would = like to share it. Mashing it up with other patches would invalidate = months of testing, defeating the purpose of the exercise. If you are interested in integrating Append with this branch, why not = create a 20.200 branch and do so? Unless you are vetoing the sharing of work as is on a branch (the = purpose of the branch), I suggest we move on. Thanks, E14 On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 > On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >=20 >> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's >> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the >> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least >> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). >>=20 >> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on >> github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set >> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and >> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? >>=20 >=20 > I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since =20 > 20.104.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes = =20 > work on stability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single = =20 > jobs/users from taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. = =20 > So, unfortunately the delta is pretty large. >=20 > I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. = =20 > bug-fixes and enhancements. >=20 >>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of =20= >>> them, >>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes =20= >>> we have >>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle =20= >>> tested >>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is = a >>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm =20 >>> pretty sure >>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >>=20 >> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? = Instead >> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could >> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users = don't >> have to choose. >>=20 >=20 >=20 > We are discussing two options: > 20 + security + enhancements > 20 + security + append >=20 > I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is =20= > that it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work =20= > merging 6 months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of =20= > work) will need a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. >=20 > I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on = 0.22. >=20 > I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely =20= > because I don't have to spend cycles testing it. >=20 > Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... >=20 > Arun >=20 From general-return-2760-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:07:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25340 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:07:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:07:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:07:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8975 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8962 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:07:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:07:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.98 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.98] (HELO asmtpout023.mac.com) (17.148.16.98) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:07:35 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF000D3S101U9B0@asmtp023.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:07:14 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_03:2011-01-14,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101130227 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:07:13 -0800 Message-id: <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I say just do it. Eli said it wasn't a blocker. Sure it ain't perfect, but it's good enough. Let's move on to 0.22 and beyond. Nige On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's >> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the >> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least >> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). >> >> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on >> github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set >> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and >> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? >> > > I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since 20.104.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work on stability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users from taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, unfortunately the delta is pretty large. > > I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. bug-fixes and enhancements. > >>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of them, >>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes we have >>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle tested >>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a >>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty sure >>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >> >> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instead >> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could >> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't >> have to choose. >> > > > We are discussing two options: > 20 + security + enhancements > 20 + security + append > > I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is that it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging 6 months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. > > I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on 0.22. > > I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely because I don't have to spend cycles testing it. > > Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... > > Arun > From general-return-2761-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:18:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27535 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:18:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:18:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 20411 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:18:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20073 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20065 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:18:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:18:34 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF0000NO1ICZM30@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:18:13 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_03:2011-01-14,2011-01-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101130228 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:18:12 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Folks, As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. CURRENT SVN REPO: hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches PROPOSAL: hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. Thoughts? Cheers, Nige From general-return-2762-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:22:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27914 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:22:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24332 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24077 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24069 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:22:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:22:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:22:28 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E6LifC069808 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:21:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:21:43 -0800 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:21:39 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acuzs0/6zNYFKtVfS8ylIlL2Hzktsw== Message-ID: <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org *nod* Ok. Arun On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:08 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > I say just do it. Eli said it wasn't a blocker. Sure it ain't perfect, b= ut it's good enough. >=20 > Let's move on to 0.22 and beyond. >=20 > Nige >=20 > On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>=20 >>> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's >>> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the >>> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least >>> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). >>>=20 >>> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on >>> github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set >>> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and >>> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? >>>=20 >>=20 >> I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since 20.104= .3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work on st= ability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users fro= m taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, unfortunately = the delta is pretty large. >>=20 >> I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. b= ug-fixes and enhancements. >>=20 >>>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of the= m, >>>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes we= have >>>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle tes= ted >>>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a >>>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty = sure >>>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >>>=20 >>> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instead >>> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could >>> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't >>> have to choose. >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> We are discussing two options: >> 20 + security + enhancements >> 20 + security + append >>=20 >> I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is tha= t it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging 6 = months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need a= lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. >>=20 >> I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on 0.22. >>=20 >> I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely be= cause I don't have to spend cycles testing it. >>=20 >> Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... >>=20 >> Arun >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2763-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:29:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34794 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:29:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 26744 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26497 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26489 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:29:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:29:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:29:22 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so5898395qyk.14 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:29:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.239.142 with SMTP id kw14mr413425qcb.38.1294986540924; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:29:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:29:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry for rattling you guys, definitely wasn't discussing a veto. I'm absolutely not opposed, just thought the alternative Todd raised was worth a couple emails since users have requested both security and append, and such a branch that includes both of those plus enhancements and substantial testing exists. Arun - I appreciate all the info, looking forward to the release. Thanks, Eli On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote= : > *nod* Ok. > > Arun > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:08 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > >> I say just do it. =A0Eli said it wasn't a blocker. Sure it ain't perfect= , but it's good enough. >> >> Let's move on to 0.22 and beyond. >> >> Nige >> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>> >>>> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's >>>> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the >>>> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least >>>> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). >>>> >>>> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on >>>> github? =A0If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch se= t >>>> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and >>>> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? >>>> >>> >>> I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since 20.10= 4.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work on s= tability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users fr= om taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, unfortunately= the delta is pretty large. >>> >>> I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. = bug-fixes and enhancements. >>> >>>>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of th= em, >>>>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes w= e have >>>>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle te= sted >>>>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a >>>>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty= sure >>>>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >>>> >>>> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? =A0Inste= ad >>>> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could >>>> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't >>>> have to choose. >>>> >>> >>> >>> We are discussing two options: >>> 20 + security + enhancements >>> 20 + security + append >>> >>> I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is th= at it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging 6= months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need = a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. >>> >>> I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on 0.22= . >>> >>> I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely b= ecause I don't have to spend cycles testing it. >>> >>> Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... >>> >>> Arun >>> >> > From general-return-2764-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:37:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37118 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:37:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30729 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30566 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30553 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:37:33 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2509646iwn.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.59.149 with SMTP id l21mr322549ibh.196.1294987031933; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:37:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:36:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:36:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ebea3806f1a60499c8aa6e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485ebea3806f1a60499c8aa6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Sorry for rattling you guys, definitely wasn't discussing a veto. I'm > absolutely not opposed, just thought the alternative Todd raised was > worth a couple emails since users have requested both security and > append, and such a branch that includes both of those plus > enhancements and substantial testing exists. > > Arun - I appreciate all the info, looking forward to the release. > > Same here. Back to the patch queue for me! 0.22 here we come. -Todd > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Arun C Murthy > wrote: > > *nod* Ok. > > > > Arun > > > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:08 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > > > >> I say just do it. Eli said it wasn't a blocker. Sure it ain't perfect, > but it's good enough. > >> > >> Let's move on to 0.22 and beyond. > >> > >> Nige > >> > >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >>> > >>>> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's > >>>> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the > >>>> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least > >>>> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). > >>>> > >>>> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on > >>>> github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set > >>>> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and > >>>> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since > 20.104.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work > on stability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users > from taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, > unfortunately the delta is pretty large. > >>> > >>> I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e. > bug-fixes and enhancements. > >>> > >>>>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of > them, > >>>>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes > we have > >>>>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle > tested > >>>>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is a > >>>>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm pretty > sure > >>>>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) > >>>> > >>>> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instead > >>>> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could > >>>> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don't > >>>> have to choose. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We are discussing two options: > >>> 20 + security + enhancements > >>> 20 + security + append > >>> > >>> I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is > that it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging > 6 months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need > a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. > >>> > >>> I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on > 0.22. > >>> > >>> I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely > because I don't have to spend cycles testing it. > >>> > >>> Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... > >>> > >>> Arun > >>> > >> > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485ebea3806f1a60499c8aa6e-- From general-return-2765-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 06:37:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37215 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 06:37:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 32035 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31961 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31951 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 06:37:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:37:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:37:39 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E6b80H052330 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:37:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:37:07 -0800 From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:37:03 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AcuztXaectlR6qMeRFybFnI8dG8VBg== Message-ID: <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 No worries. Thanks to both Eli & Todd for the discussion.=20 I look forward to getting this done and moving ahead to 0.22 and beyond. thanks, Arun On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:29 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote: > Sorry for rattling you guys, definitely wasn't discussing a veto. I'm > absolutely not opposed, just thought the alternative Todd raised was > worth a couple emails since users have requested both security and > append, and such a branch that includes both of those plus > enhancements and substantial testing exists. >=20 > Arun - I appreciate all the info, looking forward to the release. >=20 > Thanks, > Eli >=20 > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Arun C Murthy wro= te: >> *nod* Ok. >>=20 >> Arun >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:08 PM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: >>=20 >>> I say just do it. Eli said it wasn't a blocker. Sure it ain't perfect,= but it's good enough. >>>=20 >>> Let's move on to 0.22 and beyond. >>>=20 >>> Nige >>>=20 >>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> The cdh3 patch set Todd is talking about is not vanilla 104.3, it's >>>>> 104.3 re-based onto 20.2 plus patches from branch-20 and trunk (the >>>>> performance and stability fixes I think you're referring to, at least >>>>> the ones that have been posted to Apache jira). >>>>>=20 >>>>> Can you post a pointer to the version you're referring to, eg on >>>>> github? If there isn't a big delta between it and the cdh3 patch set >>>>> (which should have the 20-based patches from jira) perhaps you and >>>>> Todd could easily merge in the delta to create 0.20.x? >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> I can guarantee it will need work to merge the enhancements since 20.1= 04.3, it's over 6 months of development. The enhancements includes work on = stability such as iterative ls, limits on JT to prevent single jobs/users f= rom taking it down etc. and lots of bug-fixes to security. So, unfortunatel= y the delta is pretty large. >>>>=20 >>>> I'm working on a CHANGES.txt which should reflect all the changes i.e.= bug-fixes and enhancements. >>>>=20 >>>>>> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of t= hem, >>>>>> *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance fixes = we have >>>>>> done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is a battle t= ested >>>>>> and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ nodes. It is = a >>>>>> significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never deployed. I'm prett= y sure >>>>>> *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >>>>>=20 >>>>> Definitely, but better to hit two birds with one stone right? Instea= d >>>>> of a security + enhancements release and an append release we could >>>>> have a single security + append + enhancements release and users don'= t >>>>> have to choose. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> We are discussing two options: >>>> 20 + security + enhancements >>>> 20 + security + append >>>>=20 >>>> I think the value we provide via 20+security+enhancements release is t= hat it's stable, tested and deployed at scale. Doing any more work merging = 6 months of work at Yahoo (again, I guarantee it's a lot of work) will need= a lots of cycles to validate, test and stabilize. >>>>=20 >>>> I feel the alternative is a distraction for me, I'd rather work on 0.2= 2. >>>>=20 >>>> I can get 20+security+enhancements done very, very, quickly precisely = because I don't have to spend cycles testing it. >>>>=20 >>>> Does that make sense? Thanks for being patient and bearing with me... >>>>=20 >>>> Arun >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2766-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 07:00:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40742 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 07:00:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 07:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 46076 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:00:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45691 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:00:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45683 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 07:00:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:00:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:00:14 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so2578084wye.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:59:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4wc2/K6gHnEKr7nEdxqtJS8QVx3M1k4ArDcpIVuwXdU=; b=Dnu4G5P/2MZpbPiuPRvoGKZjeCeQVbP89rsCqaGSm3pQKnQpA+NTOXf+DDFzszSgTQ iUxDgZD0r8LQWZvclZik7ebuXEMACFkiKrTAKw+0XKFBu8k/1GAfshUl2KThKiX65Jlf lwoCvCsZXjzvZYzT5KeuuydtiSFd1ms+cNROE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=A5mzzYck9Li6RKxBJG2VZsNmMBS3hq7pEfVJGvoN/tY2NQAx7QuUA3yKDosKmymrbN UpbFbr1GypFjRGqHNDZKix4WNl7amJi06gQ8G2Tz3CqHUMsJhL8VzW4meSO+ZOyygH2O w61sQVMODNQE40xTIdTp903D5C3bPK5xXsqiY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr1322764wep.96.1294988391731; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:59:51 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:59:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:59:51 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VKCnvQOVy8xi9zOr_eU1WnxlUTI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about security+append!) Good luck w/ the release Arun. We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. St.Ack From general-return-2767-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 07:17:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53163 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 07:17:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 07:17:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 57112 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:17:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56760 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:17:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56752 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 07:17:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:17:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:17:12 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E7GWHL064163 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.76.23) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:16:31 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:16:29 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <228FCE4D-1021-473E-A566-7889CA50463A@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I'd love to see that! On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: > (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about > security+append!) > > Good luck w/ the release Arun. > > We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. > > St.Ack From general-return-2768-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 07:21:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54166 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 07:21:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 07:21:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 66592 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66110 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66097 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 07:21:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:21:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:21:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn4-10-72-168-c97.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.168.97]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E7L2c6098319 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:21:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1294989663; bh=3otjoQNNGxBqL3XY38exrBuqRlu76Y6iQlk4myHY7CQ=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=kGt/QUthNxmAilDUN+2poaKXVZXr/BbNGrwntMeppV1VhwRD6TE4NizQeiKzI6sms IbCYhPM3Ofuud9x8mlH7QvhRy1sdRHrNPKj3nbxTN5uqf6/Hi4kNYlriHxgYcUcElp r0InoIDnQ5B6XYIkmMslEbGPTrUBa0Z8EfDrrrOE= Message-Id: <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:21:02 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@! mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: > (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about > security+append!) > > Good luck w/ the release Arun. > Thanks! > We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. > Super! Arun From general-return-2769-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 07:25:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54604 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 07:25:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 07:25:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 68508 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:25:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68218 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68210 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 07:25:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:25:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:25:38 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0E7P620067179 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.76.23) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:25:06 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:25:04 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, >=20 > As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on = what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an = adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has = caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could = alleviate some of that. >=20 > CURRENT SVN REPO: >=20 > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >=20 > PROPOSAL: >=20 > hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >=20 > We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given = that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN = structure enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top = level build and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. =20 >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-2770-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 07:44:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58615 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 07:44:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 07:44:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 90725 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90393 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 07:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90376 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 07:44:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:44:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:44:08 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2549787iwn.35 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.59.149 with SMTP id l21mr372466ibh.196.1294991027061; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:43:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:43:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:43:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ebea3827c3af0499c998d8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485ebea3827c3af0499c998d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Big +1. Curious how this will map to git, though - do we go back to one git repo? When we have a patch that is mainly HDFS or MR focused but will need changes across projects, can we just put up one patch in HDFS/MR or do we still need to open a parallel common JIRA? On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > +1 > > Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what > and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many > folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting > headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. > > > > CURRENT SVN REPO: > > > > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk > > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches > > > > PROPOSAL: > > > > hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > > hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > > > > We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given > that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure > enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build > and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cheers, > > Nige > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485ebea3827c3af0499c998d8-- From general-return-2771-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 08:32:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79063 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 08:32:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 08:32:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 46439 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45952 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45938 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 08:32:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:32:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:32:31 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so2470011qwh.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:32:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from :subject:date:to; bh=vn4vVSirIjTWIsjUKj727wC+eBAf/I38vrpHuJiapec=; b=sOwBI98eVyitMigA1gT9cvcFjFrbt9JT+bERpjqSAjwu/kl8QVyv/Z/t/CGMFx2cJh mfINjzUiJH0X71znNmtW6Z+WYT0VdNKTKugu3wndtphOWrEKuLJl9kTyMdV+ma78YmUs y2xnrDcTfA8rdLUuxclcrqNoNYwLoByLJkPEc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=SNGIPwE8eUumgRewfKNs+w7PvW/vuAUOGTKI3xlyAGgtNFFGGQ4Re0/JkUemumheQz SpjSIxqpXA3BOT5UJkJ5cy3JXJTKaZZZmGBuE2yFFpmYsnEXb0C7kq7Mvrmc/q4GO5N2 rKmK+DERxDT9Is05qsxDpDJJMS1s0vAuY0q2U= Received: by 10.224.61.10 with SMTP id r10mr437094qah.105.1294993930049; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.163] ([64.206.95.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb15sm671705qcb.38.2011.01.14.00.32.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:32:08 -0800 (PST) References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8C148) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> Cc: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8C148) From: Ian Holsman Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:32:03 -0500 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 full agreement.=20 I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is set up= ), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. ---=20 Ian Holsman AOL Inc Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman=20 it's just a technicality On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrot= e: > +1 >=20 > Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. >=20 > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> Folks, >>=20 >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what a= nd how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many f= olks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting h= eadache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >>=20 >> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>=20 >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>=20 >> PROPOSAL: >>=20 >> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>=20 >> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given th= at, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure enfo= rces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build and pk= g scripts that operate across all 3 projects. =20 >>=20 >> Thoughts? >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Nige >=20 From general-return-2772-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 08:40:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80749 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 08:40:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 08:40:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 55457 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55174 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55166 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 08:40:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:40:06 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2635672iyb.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:39:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4Ty4x45GjPjkXH5+aAJFt3FDoCB1xUY8EZApB0naRrM=; b=ZexOgKDjlviZOeH3LsOzoj4KwaXG3oyQVPDbYudF60QSkAjw3PiNvpddKbEa5bGpXQ Aao6ZztXqkC44xdNGrlpVnNy/fd4qg3Yi7bQkeJYBbOWqUoRqXQAnJH9FgB+919dsVAL JYvDeJkP4gyqUXGXSWExBScSpJi5EqVmuVnlU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R8mOyOgdjR26QnHrz+b2YK8mgPexQUYoQtXWnB0rVcn3tbYLvWz07qHpj5ZWWrLC+7 Zt4UPSoPA5Fvc0nRyuztCf9Wt/1JB5cERlUsBRXjzsSrddLLirLoF4WBsOwjcD+B/JNV pDIXXwpn+cG8U9BXik7rQBhTXgNZq9tdg9lpE= Received: by 10.231.16.68 with SMTP id n4mr443005iba.94.1294994385926; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:39:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:39:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:39:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1. The project split is a lie. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > +1 full agreement. > > I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is set= up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. > > --- > Ian Holsman > AOL Inc > Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com > (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman > > it's just a technicality > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > >> +1 >> >> Death to the project split! =A0Or short of that, anything to tame it. >> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on wha= t and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. =A0= Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a spli= tting headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some o= f that. >>> >>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>> >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>> >>> PROPOSAL: >>> >>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> >>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. =A0Give= n that, they should be branched and released as a unit. =A0This SVN structu= re enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level buil= d and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >> > From general-return-2773-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 08:58:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85948 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 08:58:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 08:58:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 72724 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72526 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 08:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72518 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 08:58:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:34 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2647579iyb.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.59.149 with SMTP id l21mr430793ibh.196.1294995493726; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:58:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:57:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:57:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ebea3863ab560499caa241 --001485ebea3863ab560499caa241 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Nigel, Would there be any way to add a feature where we can make some special comment on the JIRA that would trigger a hudson retest? There are a lot of really old patches out on the JIRA that would be worth re-testing against trunk, and it's a pain to download and re-attach. I'm thinking a comment with a special token like "@Hudson.Test" Failing that, Ian, can you add me to the Hudson list? -Todd On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: > > ---------------------------------- > > > >> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no > longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must > upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// > hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue > number. > > > > That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? > > [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] > > Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy > The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on > watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch > Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the > triggering mechanism had to change. > > Cheers, > Nige > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --001485ebea3863ab560499caa241-- From general-return-2774-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 11:58:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66546 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 11:58:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 11:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 745 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 11:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 344 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 11:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 335 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 11:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.204] (HELO nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:58:34 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.70] by nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 11:58:13 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.1] by tm10.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 11:58:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 11:58:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 884614.22992.bm@omp1001.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 76600 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2011 11:58:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295006293; bh=kZ4ejDhFONO9VEGRm8aCpTZgRf0jtVnWLQ272wToZZY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SfZw2j95inmVZOqlCbHLGZIbgURttvlpP9lCH+uja7cUTDsQVNodRPWDRxeW1XS7CXRdoaAer0c/xFpA8ufFyeKxY6jJI2oaiTvozuRtUPtXihYluky26bF1hp7hsgK5C1ykksVWJpl0MdaU9DTs0xVJhmTITVfW6itKfJmWaic= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0WGhvXt6J5bQBpnMNCoBVgCWjkrJPwJ8IpM3uaY9tovdGPmQ+81SlTE3ahDrcXSkHpOV52kX00/14SdCUj89HSh6eoL41eit+ZcFsPHQZVS2IvmQ3JzT4eWdV5a9R89ywBvKXAUeNuYunna/a1mAbHWbLUUIqZCoM1o1flgIYJ4=; Message-ID: <461412.75099.qm@web112109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: AoZ0LyoVM1kt6yTg.hZeatfKXQvWHmshCD03QGyA8rhC8GX n54QX2mQW9qrmD_K4IVDfcXLGLvC07QeHXZe1Lo7.OQudA58PCr5nzVYjJew OqzIsF1bIFt5nCe.S5.7DMygL57F52YYBMYaC9VXTXm.ghmzzCJh6nPbyGib eazyYmnA1vf3d.TDSs4jbjkJ4VRFu_eqOveO2MNOTCHQqn13DZOiCJVttogy soNgxIHjz5VzOxuqqS6P4ujGbQwKDQAk9FcG47WVDsmZDgqUmiNiNIw5bdU1 wJn7ZvLWCDW5iVQtayFf0l1PbVAzWCMKlitZPvqjKibpEh.Ph6dDci3m96FF S6ON1kg0rc3qkoASQaijSp__F_4b8YkW7QIoAcRdGUP6vPu73SpwLC1CFGo3 6E0Su.lJjjfA- Received: from [129.132.85.169] by web112109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:58:13 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:58:13 -0800 (PST) From: Grandl Robert Subject: Ease of development in Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-877460507-1295006293=:75099" --0-877460507-1295006293=:75099 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, I want to make some minor modifications in FairShare scheduler and recompile it such that to use it as before. Is there an easy way to do it without spending much time on recompiling everything or without errors ? I read here http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/EclipseEnvironment but I did not manage to really compile. However, I want only to make some slightly changes on the scheduler and rerun with my modifications. Also I saw some test directories for each scheduler. So another question follows: how I can test only the scheduler with that tests or others made by me without running all Hadoop platform. It is also possible to simulate machines locally such that recompiling and deploying the code to not take so much time ? My working scenario has 30 nodes. It is really necessary whenever I recompile the scheduler to resubmit the code on the nodes or I can somehow simulate locally the nodes and make faster the process of development ? Thank you very much for any help, Robert --0-877460507-1295006293=:75099-- From general-return-2775-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 13:41:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28221 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 13:41:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 13:41:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 24483 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 13:41:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24199 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 13:41:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24191 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 13:41:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:41:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:41:37 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so972704vws.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:41:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=mvigzjs2jT8KuJOtnvKN/F/o65EgCq5JWTaTngPYGWg=; b=nCZONdGlj254EHlSRpdcG8x+lfdCRVYQy9LtHVJap+0TjOkQQjjivC2s90ihaT70Cl yCiyeKD59nj1rbUHFVvrCSzDgLMxZm99r7EZEPC3hlpt35ydJ92FwHVr8UF8+hqpHeV/ p7igLCx6srIvVBRw2CLDpZ3fmjIlCZ28KYEzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=iXcTs1ks8oa0PYeudHeqvAaZZWGFmqGejWVXata417s6rrmih6uqFyzKgpIoZy4YMm M0J8MvIa68L25HH+1AX83gALzwneQ64H8IvJAnH33/cxzUxzYtaWntOzNnHX59JxBjl2 9WE4NDfN9Mw3hwxuy6JQxP2lnao8serjKaa+c= Received: by 10.220.71.81 with SMTP id g17mr228454vcj.184.1295012475911; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:41:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.25] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y14sm400323vch.4.2011.01.14.05.41.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:41:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:41:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2482641B-D27F-49BF-85EE-CF9D0DF66DFD@Holsman.NET> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) added.. (and Todd as well). On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Please add me... >=20 >=20 > On 1/12/11 5:18 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: >=20 > and done. > anybody else want access? >=20 > On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >>=20 >> Nige >>=20 >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>=20 >>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>> --Konstantin >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this = you no >>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, = you must >>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can = kickhttps:// >>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the = issue >>>> number. >>>>>=20 >>>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>>>=20 >>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>>=20 >>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer = relies on >>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into = Patch >>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, = thus the >>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 From general-return-2776-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 13:42:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28836 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 13:42:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 13:42:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 29012 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 13:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28925 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 13:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28916 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 13:42:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:42:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:42:37 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so972811vws.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:42:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=XkJYBOLFjEw99LY/IqfU1LDKGSQbPN5WaEXGXgFfJL8=; b=s/jWplwi0TQj4ga3sNBk+k7T3zZL7OME9X/zhFQN2Rvqk2WxpEdG+WIj0jajrkRAW+ bdgGU2vvKXDaJ6OCckKyQF7R8r4h4/Q6VdWIZTYBEulCvogSYXS+i+OwwC3IUdvjqmIQ 9rkYC08XPeliQAnL4Ff2TTr7COIJaLx83iWIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=OwojQWzVt7cvmYOHDO+MHBH5PAQ2s1osJr2KB/smdDGjfGFXuSEA2Z0sywWVS/Cvl9 x0k7fJFbOj9Cb9ynQl/xWvVkZS482A/IGqV210JqQNCol/glQlud18ya183i/0vW4CuS AuiFyulZJB0z6l3lJY4RmLhvXDE7zZdBTGdRY= Received: by 10.220.181.2 with SMTP id bw2mr278465vcb.48.1295012535375; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:42:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.25] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y14sm400323vch.4.2011.01.14.05.42.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:42:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:42:11 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project = altogether. On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1. The project split is a lie. >=20 > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >> +1 full agreement. >>=20 >> I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is = set up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth = it. >>=20 >> --- >> Ian Holsman >> AOL Inc >> Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com >> (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman >>=20 >> it's just a technicality >>=20 >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >>=20 >>> +1 >>>=20 >>> Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. >>>=20 >>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Folks, >>>>=20 >>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on = what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an = adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has = caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could = alleviate some of that. >>>>=20 >>>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>>=20 >>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>>=20 >>>> PROPOSAL: >>>>=20 >>>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>=20 >>>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. = Given that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN = structure enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top = level build and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>>>=20 >>>> Thoughts? >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2777-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 14:15:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46477 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 14:15:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 14:15:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 65900 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 14:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65637 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 14:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65629 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 14:15:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:15:07 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so980487vws.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:14:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=s5I2UV3THvpjrSEtEppe+lNGN6jmc91z6gepeQWyims=; b=NDmrrA2QlRpRALCjXAK1KQFuHy/8McyqfGmgdYGvfsU6VIPA3vTADdoar4eEVmiEnG 26X9BaKu/Pq4OyVzrFVkNAvDAEvHf0Ns3cS5SA9PBwlMWSHEjZsknSq/Kbck8sZeiI80 ZHySu7dGS4NIOG028UwCKw1FSfwJLgAsO3JrU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=c4tVWi/WJ3MRIGlWwkhOSZrmjCpIO4DEQ3NV99OWAViAuSHPD98ra9/MA4v5eCEHwc IQyA39/BieprEAXjO+hIFclmPh43Ioya8ElAD6S1RGkJwx9cVp5SHQ1IBgGV4ZEezlyb bIEpwL5u+NNAAqlrREk0OZrF/WSR+V2GVnNRg= Received: by 10.220.181.135 with SMTP id by7mr239854vcb.258.1295014485748; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.25] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm406821vcr.15.2011.01.14.06.14.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:14:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:14:41 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@! mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) (with my Apache hat on) I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append = (as opposed to a series of smaller patches). for the following reasons: 1. It encourages bad behavior. We want discussion (and development) to = happen on the lists, not in some office. By allowing these large = code-dumps it condones this behavior, and we will likely see it again = and again. Like it or not, this is not the apache model of open source = governance.=20 2. There is a risk that some code that is not in a JIRA or separate = patch creeps in unwittingly. This isn't a major deal per se, but we = don't really have the proper paper trail, or the documentation on what = bug it fixed etc etc. 3. Other groups (Facebook for example) are running with their own set of = patches. They currently have the luxury of examining each individual = patch to decide if they want to integrate it (and test it) in their = environment. We are forcing them to do the work of finding the bits they = want in this huge patch. 4. By not including the append patch, we are making this release = unusable for a large portion of our community who run hbase. 5. It makes it very hard to test. While It makes me comfortable that it = has gone through Yahoo!'s QA and is running in their environments, it = doesn't mean that it will work in other organizations who have different = workload mixes and software running on them. With one huge patch it = makes it all or nothing.. either they take the code-drop and perform a = large QA-integration effort, or they forgo the whole patch together. **BUT** we have both the Yahoo! & Cloudera guys happy to do it, and to = spend their time doing it.. so I think having the code-drop will put us = in a better place then where we are. BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, = most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we = have a major feature and we are all gung ho for it..=20 --Ian On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >=20 >> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >> security+append!) >>=20 >> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>=20 >=20 > Thanks! >=20 >> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>=20 >=20 > Super! >=20 > Arun From general-return-2778-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 16:43:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19827 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 16:43:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 16:43:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19978 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:43:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19451 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19438 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:43:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:43:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:43:00 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF0008UZUE37D20@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140076 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <2482641B-D27F-49BF-85EE-CF9D0DF66DFD@Holsman.NET> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:42:03 -0800 Message-id: <45973863-6027-4AD0-ABFA-279C3EF8BC48@mac.com> References: <2482641B-D27F-49BF-85EE-CF9D0DF66DFD@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ian, Todd, Cos, Konst, Jakob, Anyone else given this access: PLEASE do NOT kill any builds from Hudson (little red x box) even if they appear hung. Hudson does not kill the underlying processes properly so they get left behind and can silently affect subsequent jobs. Instead, email this list that a job appears to be hung. Giri or I can then clean up the job properly. Thanks, nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:41 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > added.. (and Todd as well). > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > >> Please add me... >> >> >> On 1/12/11 5:18 PM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: >> >> and done. >> anybody else want access? >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >>> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>> >>>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>>> --Konstantin >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >>>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must >>>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>>>> number. >>>>>> >>>>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>>>> >>>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>>> >>>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on >>>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >>>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the >>>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>>>> >>> >> >> > From general-return-2779-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 16:45:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20508 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 16:45:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 16:45:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 23714 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:45:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23604 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23595 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:45:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:45:14 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF00084WUI68330@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:44:31 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140076 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:44:30 -0800 Message-id: <7B0FFEF0-56CE-4AD6-AD74-291C49AEB0E6@mac.com> References: <5125873.329641294877388152.JavaMail.jira@thor> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Todd, please file a Jira in Common against test component. FWIW, I fear the precommit integration with Jira will need some amount of work as Apache moves to Jira 4.2 in the coming weeks. Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Nigel, > > Would there be any way to add a feature where we can make some special > comment on the JIRA that would trigger a hudson retest? There are a lot of > really old patches out on the JIRA that would be worth re-testing against > trunk, and it's a pain to download and re-attach. > > I'm thinking a comment with a special token like "@Hudson.Test" > > Failing that, Ian, can you add me to the Hudson list? > > -Todd > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>> ---------------------------------- >>> >>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must >> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >> number. >>> >>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >> >> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >> >> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on >> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the >> triggering mechanism had to change. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-2780-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 16:52:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23041 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 16:52:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 36847 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36556 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36545 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:52:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.212] (HELO qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:51:55 +0000 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vUia1f0010EZKEL5EUrbtF; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:51:35 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vUrS1f00H2SbwD53MUrVir; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:51:33 +0000 Message-Id: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:51:26 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on > what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an > adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split > has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small > change could alleviate some of that. > > CURRENT SVN REPO: > > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches > > PROPOSAL: > > hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amount of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the repository. Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individual user. I assume you meant to propose: hadoop/ {trunk, branches/*, tags/* } / {common, hdfs, mapreduce} which means that you can make checkouts, branches and tags with a single command. Your proposal as stated would break all of the tools that count on standard layouts of subversion repositories, such as the subversion to git gateways and eclipse. We currently have other stuff at the top level of hadoop: hive, logos, nightly, pig, site, and zookeeper. Clearly hive, pig, and zookeeper should be removed. The others are just versioned and aren't branched. I'm fine with leaving them at the top level as "extra" bits, but it should be decided. -- Owen From general-return-2781-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 16:52:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23275 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 16:52:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 38390 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:52:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28334 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:47:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: niels@basj.es X-Originating-IP: [212.121.118.65] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:46:40 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9lD8DWE7xdVdFwwCmADYBRi7rt8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Restricting number of records from map output From: Niels Basjes To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I have a sort job consisting of only the Mapper (no Reducer) task. I want my > results to contain only the top n records. Is there any way of restricting > the number of records that are emitted by the Mappers? > > Basically I am looking to see if there is an equivalent of achieving > the behavior similar to LIMIT in SQL queries. I think I understand your goal. However the question is toward (what I think) is the wrong solution. A mapper gets 1 record as input and only knows about that one record. There is no way to limit there. If you implement a simple reducer you can very easily let is stop reading the input iterator after N records and limit the output in that way. Doing it in the reducer also allows you to easily add a concept of "Top N" by using the "Secondary Sort" trick to sort the input before it arrives at the reducer. HTH Niels Basjes From general-return-2782-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 16:59:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25029 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 16:59:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 16:59:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 50854 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50495 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 16:59:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50487 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:59:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:59:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:59:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 24924 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 16:58:49 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:58:49 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so1479929eyz.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.127.89 with SMTP id f25mr782785bks.143.1295024327451; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.61.73 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <461412.75099.qm@web112109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <461412.75099.qm@web112109.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:58:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ease of development in Hadoop From: "Owen O'Malley" To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6db293403640b0499d1595d --0016e6db293403640b0499d1595d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Redirecting to mapreduce-dev. As described in http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html, general isn't for user/dev questions. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Grandl Robert wrote: > I want to make some minor modifications in FairShare scheduler and > recompile it such that to use it as before. Is there an easy way to do it > without spending much time on recompiling everything or without errors ? Assuming you are working on a 0.20 release, get the source and run "ant compile". That will create all of the jars for you including the contrib ones. -- Owen --0016e6db293403640b0499d1595d-- From general-return-2783-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:18:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38430 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:18:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 71366 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:18:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71086 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71077 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:18:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:18:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:18:11 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so3098094iyb.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.4 with SMTP id r4mr947764ibr.146.1295025470256; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:17:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.115.8 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:17:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> References: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:17:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221532ca2821398b0499d19db5 --00221532ca2821398b0499d19db5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > Folks, >> >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >> >> CURRENT SVN REPO: >> >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >> >> PROPOSAL: >> >> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> > > > Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amount > of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the repository. > Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individual > user. > Yep, I think we can set this up in a reasonable way with grafts. I'm happy to write a little shell script we can put on the wiki for git users that would make the history look sane. Depending on how the git mirrors work, we might even be able to get the official git.apache.org one to work, too. If we decide to go forward with this plan I'll talk to the relevant INFRA folks and see about that. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00221532ca2821398b0499d19db5-- From general-return-2784-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:20:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39227 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:20:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:20:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 74826 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74599 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:20:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74591 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:20:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:20:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:20:48 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1525613ewy.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.48.5 with SMTP id u5mr758786web.96.1295025627359; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:20:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:20:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:20:06 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gpGz8wA_P6M2sYvO3DrfFP7CvSg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tend to second most of Ian's points here. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:14, Ian Holsman wrote: > (with my Apache hat on) > I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (as opposed to a series of smaller patches). #1: we are creating a precedent of a "brain-dump" here. Although, it isn't the first one in the history of OSS. Infamous Apple "patch" to OpenBSD is another one ;) #2: How to spell 'back door' any one? #5: "almost 10 internal releases" Arun has mentioned above might be, perhaps, considered as a great quality control effort. Also, not to mention virtual impossibility to create a test plan to validate a giant features patch. > BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: > > On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. And this ^^^ But, hey I guess it's totally worth it! Cos > --Ian > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >> >>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>> security+append!) >>> >>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>> >> >> Super! >> >> Arun > > From general-return-2785-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:33:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46023 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:33:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 93415 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93045 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93026 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:33:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.102 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.102] (HELO asmtpout027.mac.com) (17.148.16.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:33:27 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF0009RSWQRPT20@asmtp027.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:32:53 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140086 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:32:51 -0800 Message-id: <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Yup, I'll say it again. The process ain't perfect but it's good enough IMO. Thank you Yahoo! for your contribution. Clearly these patch will need review before commit when going into trunk. Let's move on to 0.22. Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I tend to second most of Ian's points here. > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:14, Ian Holsman wrote: >> (with my Apache hat on) >> I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (as opposed to a series of smaller patches). > > #1: we are creating a precedent of a "brain-dump" here. Although, it > isn't the first one in the history of OSS. Infamous Apple "patch" to > OpenBSD is another one ;) > > #2: How to spell 'back door' any one? > > #5: "almost 10 internal releases" Arun has mentioned above might be, > perhaps, considered as a great quality control effort. Also, not to > mention virtual impossibility to create a test plan to validate a > giant features patch. > >> BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >> >> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. > > And this ^^^ > > But, hey I guess it's totally worth it! > Cos > >> --Ian >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>> >>>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>>> security+append!) >>>> >>>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>> >>> >>> Super! >>> >>> Arun >> >> From general-return-2786-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:33:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46124 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 94513 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94438 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94430 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:33:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:33:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:33:34 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EHWg1h040580; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:32:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:32:42 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:32:33 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Index: Acu0EQvvnMvQxF6KQEGPJHnE+mPMGg== Message-ID: <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I'm a huge supporter of the idea. On a related note, we've been looking for= the right time to mavenize. Maybe we can do both together. We could pitch = in a bunch of work on both if we could get the timing right.=20 We've got a huge batch of commits in flight now, but if we can find somethi= ng that satisfied the 22 crowd after we sync in, we'd be happy to pitch in = on unsplit and/or maven.=20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:43 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project altogether. >=20 > On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >=20 >> +1. The project split is a lie. >>=20 >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrote= : >>> +1 full agreement. >>>=20 >>> I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is s= et up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. >>>=20 >>> --- >>> Ian Holsman >>> AOL Inc >>> Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com >>> (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman >>>=20 >>> it's just a technicality >>>=20 >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> +1 >>>>=20 >>>> Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Folks, >>>>>=20 >>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on w= hat and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a spli= tting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of = that. >>>>>=20 >>>>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>>>=20 >>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>>>=20 >>>>> PROPOSAL: >>>>>=20 >>>>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>=20 >>>>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Give= n that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure= enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build = and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-2787-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:34:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46667 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:34:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:34:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 99255 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:34:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99186 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99178 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:34:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:34:14 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EHXXYe041892; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:33:33 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:33:25 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Index: Acu0ESpXLD2YI+41TTC5wR87X9Z6iQ== Message-ID: <6E1C8329-82B6-4332-AE30-60AE57D19FF8@yahoo-inc.com> References: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cool! --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >> Folks, >>>=20 >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on wha= t >>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = Many >>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a split= ting >>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of th= at. >>>=20 >>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>=20 >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>=20 >>> PROPOSAL: >>>=20 >>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amoun= t >> of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the reposito= ry. >> Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individu= al >> user. >>=20 >=20 > Yep, I think we can set this up in a reasonable way with grafts. I'm happ= y > to write a little shell script we can put on the wiki for git users that > would make the history look sane. >=20 > Depending on how the git mirrors work, we might even be able to get the > official git.apache.org one to work, too. If we decide to go forward with > this plan I'll talk to the relevant INFRA folks and see about that. >=20 > -Todd > --=20 > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-2788-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:36:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47324 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:36:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 2786 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2529 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:36:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:36:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:36:26 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so3228905qyk.14 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:36:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dOW6VGLdAkbelWrBZtCoyy7X3EwMbTuw4BAgiZUQOtE=; b=mkYgswduH2yN9Cv/PYlzwpJutoINwIj+NGL9RHAZyAbjnbeM+cYdpiUfXVqHucbTmu c1ZBh0m2XOuG63QYmbuQ59xA46FyHIgWj/OnasdKyQAa5BCMJB/KMAzU4tfhAGkyaNzu xSBk116+L7nThdx1b1DRexlMlU818N1etL71o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=trbwTGGNgVUn6X3Qm23iRgE09iOHTvQ0svwOUsfso+/cEEsTbbNKNVIxUtRTsnDUJ8 n1t8zXUkc83T4fNHg7BwzLAl0b6coWhpWI0+W1dEMd9fPoox9RT7ADLoCYO8Fq+prfpx WsZXCPceEy2c3r4qRKIl5/GZXZxd5qRUrv8BU= Received: by 10.229.110.10 with SMTP id l10mr918244qcp.56.1295026565303; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:36:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.188.69 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:35:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> From: Tom White Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:35:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 to Owen's modified layout. The current layout means that every svn operation made during a release has to be carried out three times which increases the amount of work and the chances of a mistake. Cheers Tom On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote= : > >> >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >> =A0Folks, >>> >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on wha= t >>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = =A0Many >>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a split= ting >>> headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of = that. >>> >>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>> >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>> >>> PROPOSAL: >>> >>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>> >> >> >> Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amoun= t >> of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the reposito= ry. >> Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individu= al >> user. >> > > Yep, I think we can set this up in a reasonable way with grafts. I'm happ= y > to write a little shell script we can put on the wiki for git users that > would make the history look sane. > > Depending on how the git mirrors work, we might even be able to get the > official git.apache.org one to work, too. If we decide to go forward with > this plan I'll talk to the relevant INFRA folks and see about that. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > From general-return-2789-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:45:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50069 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:45:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:45:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 13044 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:45:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12590 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:45:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12582 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:45:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:45:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:45:03 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so3125981wye.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr1850036wep.96.1295027070350; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:44:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:43:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:43:48 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UQl2qT_q6iHhKoShEJnx6GDYCuY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:32, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > I'm a huge supporter of the idea. On a related note, we've been looking f= or the right time to mavenize. Maybe we can do both together. We could pitc= h in a bunch of work on both if we could get the timing right. Adding maveninzation - a great effort by itself with a lot of potential pitfalls - into the splitting frenzy has a good chances to be pretty disruptive for individual developers. I well remember how people were screaming because virtually nothing worked in past-split time and they had to invent and learn new tricks to merely do their work. Being a great tool Maven has a relatively steep learning curve which won't ease the fact the projects layout have changed again and everyone will have to adjust their workbenches to address that fact. I suggest these two events are better be well separated in time. Cos > We've got a huge batch of commits in flight now, but if we can find somet= hing that satisfied the 22 crowd after we sync in, we'd be happy to pitch i= n on unsplit and/or maven. > > --- > E14 - via iPhone > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:43 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > >> on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project altogether= . >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> +1. The project split is a lie. >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrot= e: >>>> +1 full agreement. >>>> >>>> I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is = set up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Ian Holsman >>>> AOL Inc >>>> Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com >>>> (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman >>>> >>>> it's just a technicality >>>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Death to the project split! =A0Or short of that, anything to tame it. >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on = what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = =A0Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a s= plitting headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate som= e of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>>>> >>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>>>> >>>>>> PROPOSAL: >>>>>> >>>>>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>> >>>>>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. =A0G= iven that, they should be branched and released as a unit. =A0This SVN stru= cture enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level b= uild and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Nige >>>>> >>>> >> > From general-return-2790-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 17:52:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53984 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 17:52:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 17:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24812 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:52:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24649 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 17:52:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24641 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 17:52:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:52:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:52:26 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_yDVtP2JNtVYrDRhkCJu2iw)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF000480XMTG720@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:52:06 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140091 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:52:05 -0800 In-reply-to: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <4A1492FF-C4B5-4949-B197-53B3A3B1BE29@apache.org> Message-id: <2AC9D86E-764B-4AA7-800F-4FA7E2E814B1@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_yDVtP2JNtVYrDRhkCJu2iw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT On Jan 14, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >> >> CURRENT SVN REPO: >> >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >> >> PROPOSAL: >> >> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > > > Moving the source trees back together is ok, but will cause a fair amount of churn for those of us that depend on the git versions of the repository. Using Todd's hack may be able to fix it again at least for each individual user. Looks like Todd addressed this. Thanks! > I assume you meant to propose: > > hadoop/ {trunk, branches/*, tags/* } / {common, hdfs, mapreduce} Ya. Thanks for spelling that out more clearly Owen. > which means that you can make checkouts, branches and tags with a single command. Your proposal as stated would break all of the tools that count on standard layouts of subversion repositories, such as the subversion to git gateways and eclipse. I'm not much of a git user. 1) subversion to git gateway: break unrepairably? 2) eclipse: break in what way? I use eclipse for other projects structure like this without a problem. > We currently have other stuff at the top level of hadoop: hive, logos, nightly, pig, site, and zookeeper. Clearly hive, pig, and zookeeper should be removed. The others are just versioned and aren't branched. I'm fine with leaving them at the top level as "extra" bits, but it should be decided. +1 to removing/leaving those extra bits as you propose. We can always move the remainder later if there is a reason to. I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 for this reorg. Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_yDVtP2JNtVYrDRhkCJu2iw)-- From general-return-2791-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:00:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56186 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:00:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:00:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 36684 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:00:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36380 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36366 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:00:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:00:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:00:32 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so1094147vws.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:00:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=oBY1KtHTyi+H2GK0SAHUf81b97IutBMM1cxqFvvejCA=; b=R4MGngD4ToKttg3Aj1PdBYB3aF+mpWDYCqD9Y/S6CuYfCp5udTYbHuSbCm7dCtlPjH uRiPCBVJ4khAAAM6Gg8yQF+nrezSSpkTpCDw/KKjgvymy84lj5b4xht6aoDOiIMjoUTn YvbOp/3FQ0jLDcMMzW9Vq1RjguXh9MVY+xLjo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=tn+bb0CTaTCkbqiSUwBJmdrK4XWcEsIImfu4+JWn3TBgsMD88stxLPa6nxTdTmFVkL a1hpc+csObQkwaolPuq12xZWKdaJF9f+i1FSnZetRqr350xhJ8HflY485v2dYdn4X3II ehYTW7qu7vgl7gztAhol62y62V8hwZPI7D6Yk= Received: by 10.220.189.138 with SMTP id de10mr324315vcb.169.1295028011305; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.2.25] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14sm498136vcx.23.2011.01.14.10.00.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:00:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:00:08 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@y ahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Yup, I'll say it again. The process ain't perfect but it's good = enough IMO. Thank you Yahoo! for your contribution. agree 100%. From general-return-2792-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:01:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56355 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:01:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 37974 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:01:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37888 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:01:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37880 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:01:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:00:59 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF000IXXXR2X370@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:54:40 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140091 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:54:38 -0800 Message-id: <077B7189-D3D3-4D93-B079-30BBF356C36B@mac.com> References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Thanks for the offer Eric! I agree it's the right time to mavenize, but I think we should separate, but order, these two discussions/events. This first, then mavenization. Cheers, Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > I'm a huge supporter of the idea. On a related note, we've been looking for the right time to mavenize. Maybe we can do both together. We could pitch in a bunch of work on both if we could get the timing right. > > We've got a huge batch of commits in flight now, but if we can find something that satisfied the 22 crowd after we sync in, we'd be happy to pitch in on unsplit and/or maven. > > --- > E14 - via iPhone > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:43 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > >> on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project altogether. >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >>> +1. The project split is a lie. >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>> +1 full agreement. >>>> >>>> I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is set up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Ian Holsman >>>> AOL Inc >>>> Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com >>>> (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman >>>> >>>> it's just a technicality >>>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>>>> >>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>>>> >>>>>> PROPOSAL: >>>>>> >>>>>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>> >>>>>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Nige >>>>> >>>> >> From general-return-2793-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:04:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59391 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:04:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:04:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 46285 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45056 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45048 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:04:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:04:22 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3098066iwn.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:04:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iGtlzfCrlzTEAPVQeTJ+jsTda024iO0FIv7UoNgG4V0=; b=PVk5gbNgIY90r63OryrWFsMaDi6cewGajXIm3EmmpqJEx5OXgXVVMc6QGpIVRDeM7P xixLmkrA4Tah0tyD3+Jj2zLBf20u+hdD6hfY/yu78qe+xi1n0svbyaB0seylwgqt6mkd 26jX6euHFxPzs4j9cQXLqA5k3UvBNWFtQtIAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xw0wxrJhHTyq2q8AEPiSX6sJwF7dVGIW0DqAhxGE2nfPYfkfEs7VLufaEdO2Ke0OJW YFNbH5WZIf9Yh/4CH4BDpWgqx/5rIRMdNS6LbHnK/C/PZ3y9R05Fiz0CJsopchUvJcPm yvF5W6uRhd4ndn+pDhXfSd+IZYJOAo11QbksI= Received: by 10.231.20.68 with SMTP id e4mr998717ibb.194.1295028240761; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:03:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> From: Jakob Homan Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:03:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, mos= t people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a= major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. Not all are. I'm against it for the all the same reasons I was against 20 append. This is also being used as a wedge to get the append work in as .200. My position is that every iota effort of releasing another 20 branch is an iota not spent on getting us a kick-ass 22. 20 was great, and we had a lot of wonderful times together, but it's time to move on and see other releases. But, this is a volunteer effort, and if others want to put the effort in, they're free to do so. -jg On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Yup, I'll say it again. =A0The process ain't perfect but it's good enough= IMO. Thank you Yahoo! for your contribution. > > Clearly these patch will need review before commit when going into trunk. > > Let's move on to 0.22. > > Nige > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> I tend to second most of Ian's points here. >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:14, Ian Holsman wrote: >>> (with my Apache hat on) >>> I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (= as opposed to a series of smaller patches). >> >> #1: we are creating a precedent of a "brain-dump" here. Although, it >> isn't the first one in the history of OSS. Infamous Apple "patch" to >> OpenBSD is another one ;) >> >> #2: How to spell 'back door' any one? >> >> #5: "almost 10 internal releases" Arun has mentioned above might be, >> perhaps, considered as a great quality control effort. Also, not to >> mention virtual impossibility to create a test plan to validate a >> giant features patch. >> >>> BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >>> >>> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, m= ost people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have= a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. >> >> And this ^^^ >> >> But, hey I guess it's totally worth it! >> =A0Cos >> >>> --Ian >>> >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>>> >>>>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>>>> security+append!) >>>>> >>>>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Super! >>>> >>>> Arun >>> >>> > > From general-return-2794-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:16:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72439 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:16:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 72346 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:16:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72261 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72250 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:16:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:16:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:15:54 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EICpZR055269 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:12:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295028771; bh=KrGlsHL2Tqx8v8o4sVGCVdfetkZ6HU90b9hS+KnbrYM=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=GQisGKqx+o+fO6C0LasU+KMMKrcSY/PXICHSvaehpM3RAJWD0rVvW6ZMLAO9c99Ka QKPvroOh8+vRIY7VGParK0ccNnAhM8FN7oDGmdj0xz4mmPZ7YQJnxRtcYaGN6EcfY8 mgQ984fcrLBaZf89tz0Mt8eVUj/94+fJfP0xuA9w= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:12:51 -0800 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:12:49 -0800 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing Thread-Topic: triggering automated precommit testing Thread-Index: Acu0CoUYU0JXYvFQQeK57g8LvE1V9QADCGmH Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7B0FFEF0-56CE-4AD6-AD74-291C49AEB0E6@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C955D2212E72Bsureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C955D2212E72Bsureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It may not be as simple as triggering retest, as Some of the patches could = be old and may not apply. On 1/14/11 8:44 AM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: Todd, please file a Jira in Common against test component. FWIW, I fear th= e precommit integration with Jira will need some amount of work as Apache m= oves to Jira 4.2 in the coming weeks. Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hey Nigel, > > Would there be any way to add a feature where we can make some special > comment on the JIRA that would trigger a hudson retest? There are a lot o= f > really old patches out on the JIRA that would be worth re-testing against > trunk, and it's a pain to download and re-attach. > > I'm thinking a comment with a special token like "@Hudson.Test" > > Failing that, Ian, can you add me to the Hudson list? > > -Todd > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>> ---------------------------------- >>> >>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you mus= t >> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >> number. >>> >>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >> >> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >> >> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies o= n >> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus= the >> triggering mechanism had to change. >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera --_000_C955D2212E72Bsureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2795-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:26:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82077 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:26:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:26:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 89295 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:26:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89213 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:26:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89202 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:26:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:26:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:26:17 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EIPcaD086838; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:25:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:25:38 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:25:29 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu0GHDTGqR/wYWwQz6EtfzeWHusfQ== Message-ID: <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@! mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> In-Reply-To: <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ian, Thanks for holding off on that last .5. I've been working in a big email gi= ving move context on this. Let me preview some issues.=20 Our goal with this branch is two fold: 1) get the code out in a branch quic= kly so we an collaborate on it with the community. 2) not change the charac= ter of the code. See testing below. We're happy to compromise any other dim= ension, as long as we can do 1&2 above.=20 1) I agree this is not a good precedent. We don't support mega-patches in g= eneral. We are doing this as part of discontinuing the "yahoo distribution = of Hadoop". We don't plan to continue doing 30 person year projects outsid= e apache and then merging them in!! 2) append is hard. It is so hard we rewrote the entire write pipeline (5 pe= rson-years work) in trunk after giving up on the codeline you are suggestin= g we merge in. That work is what distinguishes all post 20 releases from 20= releases in my mind. I dont trust the 20 append code line. We've been hurt= badly by it. We did the rewrite only after losing a bunch of production d= ata a bunch of times with the previous code line. I think the various 20 a= ppend patch lines may be fine for specialized hbase clusters, but they does= n't have the rigor behind them to bet your business in them. 3) I think having a very stable recent codeline available for teams coming = into Hadoop who want to run big business apps and contribute code back is v= ery helpful. I've been talking to folks in other orgs and they've expressed= a huge amount of interest in this work, but begged us to put it into apach= e, so their oversight bodies will let them use it.=20 4) we're happy to incorporate ideas into how to best merge the work into tr= unk. Let's find the most cost effective way to preserve the most devel data= possible.=20 5) testing. Ian, I think you do us a disservice when you talk about us just= testing in our environments. If you look at the history of the project, we= 've been the force behind every stable release of apache Hadoop. And all t= he non-apache Hadoop release had been tracking this patch set. We fully sup= port the community developing independent testing capabilities. We plan to= contribute to that effort. But we are the organization with far and away = the best record for testing Hadoop.=20 We are proud of thus release, we want to share it. Help us sort out how.=20 Thanks! --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:15 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > (with my Apache hat on) > I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (as= opposed to a series of smaller patches). >=20 > for the following reasons: >=20 > 1. It encourages bad behavior. We want discussion (and development) to ha= ppen on the lists, not in some office. By allowing these large code-dumps i= t condones this behavior, and we will likely see it again and again. Like i= t or not, this is not the apache model of open source governance.=20 >=20 > 2. There is a risk that some code that is not in a JIRA or separate patch= creeps in unwittingly. This isn't a major deal per se, but we don't really= have the proper paper trail, or the documentation on what bug it fixed etc= etc. >=20 > 3. Other groups (Facebook for example) are running with their own set of = patches. They currently have the luxury of examining each individual patch = to decide if they want to integrate it (and test it) in their environment. = We are forcing them to do the work of finding the bits they want in this hu= ge patch. >=20 > 4. By not including the append patch, we are making this release unusable= for a large portion of our community who run hbase. >=20 > 5. It makes it very hard to test. While It makes me comfortable that it h= as gone through Yahoo!'s QA and is running in their environments, it doesn'= t mean that it will work in other organizations who have different workload= mixes and software running on them. With one huge patch it makes it all or= nothing.. either they take the code-drop and perform a large QA-integratio= n effort, or they forgo the whole patch together. >=20 >=20 > **BUT** we have both the Yahoo! & Cloudera guys happy to do it, and to sp= end their time doing it.. so I think having the code-drop will put us in a = better place then where we are. >=20 >=20 > BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >=20 > On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, mos= t people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a= major feature and we are all gung ho for it..=20 >=20 > --Ian >=20 > On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>=20 >>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>> security+append!) >>>=20 >>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Super! >>=20 >> Arun >=20 From general-return-2796-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:31:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84160 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:31:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:31:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 97973 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:31:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97913 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97905 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:31:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:31:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:31:25 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EIUlIT082082; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:30:47 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:30:38 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu0GSk1lRKFr+chTQWn5KsQoIwRSg== Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yup. Letting people who want to contribute, do so a good meme! A stable next release would be great. But orgs do sustaining on stable code= releases for a lot of very good reasons.=20 A next Hadoop 21+ of this code quality is almost a year away in my opinion.= =20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:05 AM, "Jakob Homan" wrote: >> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, mo= st people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have = a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. >=20 > Not all are. I'm against it for the all the same reasons I was > against 20 append. This is also being used as a wedge to get the > append work in as .200. My position is that every iota effort of > releasing another 20 branch is an iota not spent on getting us a > kick-ass 22. 20 was great, and we had a lot of wonderful times > together, but it's time to move on and see other releases. >=20 > But, this is a volunteer effort, and if others want to put the effort > in, they're free to do so. > -jg >=20 > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> Yup, I'll say it again. The process ain't perfect but it's good enough = IMO. Thank you Yahoo! for your contribution. >>=20 >> Clearly these patch will need review before commit when going into trunk= . >>=20 >> Let's move on to 0.22. >>=20 >> Nige >>=20 >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>=20 >>> I tend to second most of Ian's points here. >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:14, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>> (with my Apache hat on) >>>> I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append = (as opposed to a series of smaller patches). >>>=20 >>> #1: we are creating a precedent of a "brain-dump" here. Although, it >>> isn't the first one in the history of OSS. Infamous Apple "patch" to >>> OpenBSD is another one ;) >>>=20 >>> #2: How to spell 'back door' any one? >>>=20 >>> #5: "almost 10 internal releases" Arun has mentioned above might be, >>> perhaps, considered as a great quality control effort. Also, not to >>> mention virtual impossibility to create a test plan to validate a >>> giant features patch. >>>=20 >>>> BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >>>>=20 >>>> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, = most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we hav= e a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. >>>=20 >>> And this ^^^ >>>=20 >>> But, hey I guess it's totally worth it! >>> Cos >>>=20 >>>> --Ian >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>>>>> security+append!) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks! >>>>>=20 >>>>>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Super! >>>>>=20 >>>>> Arun >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2797-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:41:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88357 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:41:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:41:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 14485 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14411 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14403 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:40:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:40:51 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.16.31.18] (adsl-71-146-5-5.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.5.5]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF00013BZVHD830@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:40:30 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140101 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: triggering automated precommit testing From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:38:28 -0800 Message-id: <35C64D76-5E29-4B69-B3D7-443392B88F15@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Suresh, FWIW the precommit build fails fast in such cases (by design). nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > It may not be as simple as triggering retest, as Some of the patches could be old and may not apply. > > > On 1/14/11 8:44 AM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > > Todd, please file a Jira in Common against test component. FWIW, I fear the precommit integration with Jira will need some amount of work as Apache moves to Jira 4.2 in the coming weeks. > > Nige > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hey Nigel, >> >> Would there be any way to add a feature where we can make some special >> comment on the JIRA that would trigger a hudson retest? There are a lot of >> really old patches out on the JIRA that would be worth re-testing against >> trunk, and it's a pain to download and re-attach. >> >> I'm thinking a comment with a special token like "@Hudson.Test" >> >> Failing that, Ian, can you add me to the Hudson list? >> >> -Todd >> >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must >>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>> number. >>>> >>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>> >>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>> >>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on >>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus the >>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > From general-return-2798-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 18:55:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95239 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 18:55:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 18:55:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 37216 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37171 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 18:55:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37163 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 18:55:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:55:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:55:30 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EIsZpg069919; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:54:35 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:54:28 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Index: Acu0HHyGses+x02mQPCxrGpJ14ogmQ== Message-ID: References: <91A364F8-480F-4323-92F6-15B47D5A3C32@yahoo-inc.com> <88238863-C1CB-4932-9288-40655F225D59@holsman.net> <669E9C98-C113-49B5-9851-4524EA936CED@yahoo-inc.com> <077B7189-D3D3-4D93-B079-30BBF356C36B@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <077B7189-D3D3-4D93-B079-30BBF356C36B@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cool --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:01 AM, "Nigel Daley" wrote: > Thanks for the offer Eric! I agree it's the right time to mavenize, but = I think we should separate, but order, these two discussions/events. This = first, then mavenization. >=20 > Cheers, > Nige >=20 > On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >=20 >> I'm a huge supporter of the idea. On a related note, we've been looking = for the right time to mavenize. Maybe we can do both together. We could pit= ch in a bunch of work on both if we could get the timing right.=20 >>=20 >> We've got a huge batch of commits in flight now, but if we can find some= thing that satisfied the 22 crowd after we sync in, we'd be happy to pitch = in on unsplit and/or maven.=20 >>=20 >> --- >> E14 - via iPhone >>=20 >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:43 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: >>=20 >>> on that note... I propose we discuss un-splitting the project altogethe= r. >>>=20 >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>=20 >>>> +1. The project split is a lie. >>>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wro= te: >>>>> +1 full agreement. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I think it will be a pita admin wise (due to how svn authorization is= set up), so it might slow down creation of a new branch, but its worth it. >>>>>=20 >>>>> --- >>>>> Ian Holsman >>>>> AOL Inc >>>>> Ian.Holsman@teamaol.com >>>>> (703) 879-3128 / AIM:ianholsman >>>>>=20 >>>>> it's just a technicality >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> +1 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Death to the project split! Or short of that, anything to tame it. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on= what and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment.= Many folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a sp= litting headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some o= f that. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> CURRENT SVN REPO: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >>>>>>> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> PROPOSAL: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>>> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Gi= ven that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structu= re enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level buil= d and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 From general-return-2799-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:04:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 415 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:04:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:04:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 51905 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51816 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51808 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:04:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:04:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:04:20 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so1432804yxm.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:03:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LCuEPM30mTPKJQMc4FbBKvmMfZjnl7HhmBwdkIut5Js=; b=wJSGbKY+GwSZHAGj5r19klEjvdwVtvuWYKafT2VAkNhLfPhD8EVHsqKpIE1M3lyD8E ERb7dTQMfTy24o7roKQWjfRULlyR2TkZgOsf4vBuDatVMrYawK+TrQgHcPk95ovkrfjX EcymQz7KxVnX9hoJfdRGRleD3H96x/MZbwpYs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=B8LlPXGgEXi7unPdxMGjfEc6Pg9DPZX0PgIjJclwkFHISMjmErang0nKfvGgnCscvi 8teBhV3RTFJzKkAnUznQPxjfXUMVWfwqR/WDt+eBuPNA6IN0Euafr2f0RdPFuUCMSu/e mn6bM08whOsKjesbamiz3Mu0NtHpM3X/bnuF4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.111.38 with SMTP id v26mr333843yhg.18.1295031710490; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.228 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:01:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:01:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8e5113a48a0499d311b2 --0023547c8e5113a48a0499d311b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. If we start this re-split now again before the major release we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create more work for the community. I see Nigel's point that packaging will get easier, and developers will push less buttons when they commit. It will delay the release - this is what worries me. Thanks, --Konstantin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what > and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many > folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting > headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. > > CURRENT SVN REPO: > > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk > hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches > > PROPOSAL: > > hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > > We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given > that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure > enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build > and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Nige > --0023547c8e5113a48a0499d311b2-- From general-return-2800-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:08:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11314 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:08:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:08:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 61754 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:08:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61682 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:08:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61674 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:08:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:08:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:08:32 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [172.16.31.18] (adsl-71-146-5-5.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.5.5]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF100LAY15M0LA0@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:08:11 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140105 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:08:10 -0800 Message-id: <225EAA53-D3F0-4E32-BB1C-6640FA46EA8F@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. > We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. Great, so let's do this reorg before we fix those jira's so we don't need to fix them again. Can you provide the issue numbers you're think of? Thx, Nige > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >> >> CURRENT SVN REPO: >> >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches >> >> PROPOSAL: >> >> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] >> >> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given >> that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN structure >> enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level build >> and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Nige >> From general-return-2801-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:16:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13846 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:16:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 75806 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:16:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75662 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75653 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:16:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:16:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.52.228] (HELO nm7-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.52.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:16:45 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm7.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:16:22 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.178] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:16:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:16:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 585684.45596.bm@omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 18602 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2011 19:16:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295032582; bh=PIki+z48q/ePdHQGHMNWp6iCEsDwfx3vO7IJ2TBKjTM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1Z6AlFkgVNgLb1+yJ27Vs+wBFjQ5zfRzrmQgsbojgDl8qLgMHWIMqEgy3/aDrmrkGBhHCQ70ItH/5Tsn9XPyUy2ij4inqpoBzZx5ZwbpbSw6RiRsdzjHAEOI9sSZjvax9Wbiu9xhbhPUqUZkIWgjiNlROUsTLjikl9otZ5AF4Tk= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fPisnWBhyQ1dicvpdGPwmcLmf0kOI2IrV4TG2wKr/gwBYbbUak0sPROtn4SWC+0EgJz7B0Qyh2eaTQCE73giyNdVkgAq6r9vcPIddmhV9tafIxvVBEdL/fcHtuOLju6D9RLzokt/j9H0TnIEizqZcbdWxL8tEOa7YXAezXBzoK4=; Message-ID: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 7bAbxbkVM1lOettzdvPRTUIvlp7YXZNVlnG0Fa9KDotEIQM 5X1MAXGxW7UVPwRrheIcrapv41r2RM_0OjLAmbeINxZPBk8rNYjTbVr0dXva HOgizJMHRnNZ6vi.hdKeKOi1cNkjnaXF9oVhikJwzKJm9rttDDjHkxeUXAoT A1GZazDJWphFRvMNTft56QhJml65chcyEUPKg0KBJV4t66cFc.1l1Z1FtNXx XT7oCeoAF1P0t4moWZpX18wsP8M7xsRkM6vFYfb7SfVi9dIgE4wAWSB.wYbc V5MjY1SlWtBbkmVTsQ4SrnngzPKSsO0Gyp0VHU.UHr88umVPwGfDyhB8ZeHj e8fy52Zk07wAGjosz0raTPGEZY0Rop1frDakfaB6mr2Mh2.L93aLJdzeU89R q8913BhemvUxgTpvx13lhU7DeyurTSyw8 Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:16:22 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:16:22 -0800 (PST) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1278697014-1295032582=:18126" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1278697014-1295032582=:18126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Nigel, > As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what > and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many > folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting > headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. Thanks. Nicholas --0-1278697014-1295032582=:18126-- From general-return-2802-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:22:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14856 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:22:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 83013 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:22:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82853 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82842 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:22:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:22:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:22:09 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.16.31.18] (adsl-71-146-5-5.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.5.5]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF10032L1RP0O10@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:21:27 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101140108 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-14_08:2011-01-14,2011-01-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:21:25 -0800 Message-id: <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi Nigel, > >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. > > Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the > problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can weigh in with additional thoughts. > You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first > understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. What do you see as the huge impact? Nige From general-return-2803-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:23:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16037 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:23:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:23:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 85255 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:23:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85206 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85198 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:23:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:23:24 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1434579gyf.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:23:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iG3KZ9SYxBKLHbRZjTN6Gy7EeT6mtfFw6W+b4gc09uU=; b=u3PgJvAXU1bhT8wm61QZsDWpEl4JMdwqVPLCa+LHmGgIjwgaHw9mR2EdzAwzwtkSvH 4SXzsFR0WZcQGwSahIJzy7zRny3IB7i/fcT+l5BO7v47J0yN8GaTQ0Eh3xXokWu6VCqV XLJlRRwzTkRnTaPV+OCNZp5JqZqC5LaS4A6l8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bFtTk7VGR8FlRPQx5EHt8jSUEWs7rl/78VugOVwGqaijkqtbaRu8tR4IC+JLr+Px2k BUwC0k3hh7Gc4rkZuLnnZjFUbmEKkrrGtX5t0DLRTnNRZx7Dc34Kv6CjSkzrfKtwdyoH LIY1Eujs8RRGo1lDc/9lTJOaSc9QXpD/SucPI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.105.240 with SMTP id k76mr2398272yhg.96.1295032978474; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.228 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <225EAA53-D3F0-4E32-BB1C-6640FA46EA8F@mac.com> References: <225EAA53-D3F0-4E32-BB1C-6640FA46EA8F@mac.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:22:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235444776da795fe0499d35ce0 --00235444776da795fe0499d35ce0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well this will generate tens of more jiras, which wont justify closing the few remaining. You have been there, it took months to get that thing settled so it was usable. I am just saying its a risk we can get the same this time. --Konstantin On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > > We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. > > We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. > > Great, so let's do this reorg before we fix those jira's so we don't need > to fix them again. Can you provide the issue numbers you're think of? > > Thx, > Nige > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > >> Folks, > >> > >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what > >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. > Many > >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a > splitting > >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of > that. > >> > >> CURRENT SVN REPO: > >> > >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / trunk > >> hadoop / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] / branches > >> > >> PROPOSAL: > >> > >> hadoop / trunk / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > >> hadoop / branches / [common, mapreduce, hdfs] > >> > >> We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given > >> that, they should be branched and released as a unit. This SVN > structure > >> enforces that and provides a more natural place to keep a top level > build > >> and pkg scripts that operate across all 3 projects. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Nige > >> > > --00235444776da795fe0499d35ce0-- From general-return-2804-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:24:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16263 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:24:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 87479 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:24:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87400 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87392 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:24:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:24:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.194] (HELO mail-wy0-f194.google.com) (74.125.82.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:24:42 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1021118wyf.5 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:24:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/uSOBseNaGZV9QApbQtQHXhh6JsdlDF8W7saZzhfrKA=; b=LOA2ZAsb//8edn6p66hyo8NkxEMuork0kQMf6dkk2bSYjxjrZq1P2Fy0QDKKc7CSs6 o9WbOYaAU08Y2VLYwMRlT3YTdZ3C4Pxhouhi3PSUCV5mDyfXxsHmLzRZTXgVS3JSxu+r FyIRTZtCPmAOWNbgGYcKwkBmjuz9ZD6Zfnm2U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wfi8Uhrdm5v/ezW4+Mwj0aCa/OiEeGRA8w1tP2x8DzO7EIc0BeCHaau6RQRh4gJq6q ngJQYaF/c3ob6tL8HzvthBbI+2DGMjwklEuRzqSlPGj11HNKEIZ/IV43DtGW2KZq1MuZ mitVIX8+tp419bYCXwLi5/KHGrQWWu+xory5M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.30.80 with SMTP id j58mr623500wea.64.1295033061503; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.63.210 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:24:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:24:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dbe70a9a72af0499d361a0 --0016e6dbe70a9a72af0499d361a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > 1) I agree this is not a good precedent. We don't support mega-patches in > general. We are doing this as part of discontinuing the "yahoo distribution > of Hadoop". We don't plan to continue doing 30 person year projects outside > apache and then merging them in!! > > I think this is a very dangerous precedent and completely unwarranted. mega-patches are bad and is totally not the Apache way to go. I think if you want to contribute it back to Apache, you should avoid the mega-patch completely. I think the various 20 append patch lines may be fine for specialized > hbase clusters, but they doesn't have the rigor behind them to bet your > business in them. > > I think you are completely off-track here and jumping to conclusions. Big business are already betting on it. HBase is becoming a big user of Hadoop (dunno whether Y! uses HBase) and I completely agree with Ian that all business have to anyway test their release themselves before using it, otherwise you could land up with data loss like the type you mentioned. thanks, dhruba --0016e6dbe70a9a72af0499d361a0-- From general-return-2805-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:54:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28210 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28182 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28123 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28115 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:54:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.53.193] (HELO nm9-vm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (98.139.53.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:54:17 +0000 Received: from [98.139.52.193] by nm9.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:53:56 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.162] by tm6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:53:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1045.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 19:53:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 315272.7988.bm@omp1045.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32816 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2011 19:53:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295034836; bh=h99pkVF639/hVsR7ykirYQ2YuYzXothe52yyeWo4VNg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Wf25dD+vLntBcnB6Ue0wVgjV3bYWmTUCM5HC1T2BiTcYRbT1z0V+mraFlIEeU4dk6AHoCXs7rjPHsv/OP8KGYtIYAsImmypk+cACES6I85reycwjA3FzEEE5aLJ0rc/6bQ34O5ADzA0pqeY95fuUHi/X8ql/e4MQ2CvxNrPP6MY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yWZOTay2tF+2OWkAvbVqg9pcgyhAZ5CMQyPIplvdM8BsMyRhmOWa++ONb+zkOM/T/hRaAWZt6H1fqSBfrHnkEnIXq0mGLi4H/kIiAwNwb5clVB5tJMtoe3a9vmqUl8sDHFaPJIYGHQi8XCg1QjUmRkH7tdl5jS67mk1C5/5x7+c=; Message-ID: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: L3YZtHUVM1meVjV20QHCofvtZgDLlW.tVJ9RRhqDvHk5gMX YwGj6beV7RNMYP3CvIF_SYPnlTGNYhAbmWKMxmtEBC67fLImnYgEfpkGsCfz hG7zJq6MJ5P24nav_WeHrbIiQ8mscyPR3pRjlSKwksMIFrDI_rjNFl4prhFM ajqOa9MMnrdrUtwB5kJ7lQ_xYHozZXfHbdmH2nTxBmx0yy_yiwpLtLLId7TH y898uloNKAUR5CM9ZATF2cvcIakfi8NkJcXDCTxl4JeO1gX6F9vUucpmg.yD FE2OCecjarY.fOe7kByTj70a6E6R_vmJGNRg2tAixmZid4qRxtz50eBqXZyv pFkYANvMN Received: from [209.131.62.113] by web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:53:55 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:53:55 -0800 (PST) From: "Tsz Wo \(Nicholas\), Sze" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1311263020-1295034835=:32737" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1311263020-1295034835=:32737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for this change. Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools using the Apache svn URLs. So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this since, as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create more work for the community. Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term target is to release these 3 projects independently? Nicholas ________________________________ From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi Nigel, > >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. > > Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the > > problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing these 3 projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can weigh in with additional thoughts. > You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first > > understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. What do you see as the huge impact? Nige --0-1311263020-1295034835=:32737-- From general-return-2806-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:59:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29317 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:59:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 33978 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33922 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33914 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:59:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SINGLE_HEADER_2K,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:59:29 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version; b=aVsNu+V/Re8On5200aHDYODuFprKjXrhL5beP4NIMFYVY4rK6VZNqzJt /c2NmWMatmo6ARp0BQQo6jSyix2eGtwG0K9uYJ2Fw21iaVJdWQJwLE5kQ aTbtYh2UF8f99dD; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1295035167; x=1326571167; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Milind=20Bhandarkar=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20Hadoop=20Security=20Release =20off=20Yahoo!=20patchset|Date:=20Fri,=2014=20Jan=202011 =2019:59:52=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20<516684F5-0052 -4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20<366A9E58- 5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org>=0D=0A=20<18C5C999 -4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20 =0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo -inc.com>=0D=0A=20<5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@m ac.com>=0D=0A=20<075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yah oo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89 C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<04 705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20<74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C 4@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<00F14279-2802 -4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D =0A=20<58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com >=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C5 98B76F@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20<10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F 648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET>=0D=0A=20<4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B- 8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=Jy7YXj53+8vpmMJ12lG0+d7vGftj2gz64Ckxoq0o5AM=; b=N4LlDN6o9H5zt7fxa1LXu81LLCt92wCdBH2R5NtPFLaaV83gd8K1ezHv SGIQl/f/oSBRy8J76VimHbeH3ycp5SBXXNBIZKw24Wz+38vQDT6E26wEK XhIy4MXWJiWpvfx; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,323,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="19227423" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:59:52 -0800 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AQHLs5XyG4qjhIhUskSpH+TlCvxumJPQZGiAgAAdGoCAAAQJgIAAAg0AgAACQICAAAZfgIAABesAgABzk4CAAEYSgIAAEHOAgAAJtIA= Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:59:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dhruba, While I do not think that the releasability of a branch should be determine= d by the market-cap (either on nasdaq or second-market) of the contributing= company, I think a well-tested release is beneficial to the community. So, I support two releases: 20.100 now, that has security. And 20.200 later= that incorporates appends (depending on the 0.22+appends timeline). That w= ay, a large percentage of community is covered in 2011. The reasons are these: 1. The proposed 20.100 is perhaps the most tested at scale, out of all 0.20= branches. In fact, among *all* hadoop releases in last 5 years. I know fir= st hand that it causes the least disruption for users, the migration from 0= .20 to 0.20.10x was the smoothest, while adding a valuable feature. 2. HBase (running on hadoop 0.20 with append) has also been scale tested at= Y!, but on much less than 4000 nodes, and certainly not for varied workloa= ds (where the bugs tend to surface). (To my knowledge, the largest HBase in= stance is at Y! in production.) 3. Operations folks need to get some experience with raw hadoop first for a= ny release, before other products on top of hadoop, and then handover the i= nstallation to users. So, there is still time for HBase+0.20.100, and that = can be addressed in a separate release. 4. It is not as if the community hasn't had a preview of this mega-patch al= ready. A large portion of the sub-patches are already in cdh3bx, and many o= f them have already been committed one-by-one to 0.22. - Milind On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> 1) I agree this is not a good precedent. We don't support mega-patches i= n >> general. We are doing this as part of discontinuing the "yahoo distribut= ion >> of Hadoop". We don't plan to continue doing 30 person year projects out= side >> apache and then merging them in!! >>=20 >>=20 > I think this is a very dangerous precedent and completely unwarranted. > mega-patches are bad and is totally not the Apache way to go. I think if = you > want to contribute it back to Apache, you should avoid the mega-patch > completely. >=20 >=20 > I think the various 20 append patch lines may be fine for specialized >> hbase clusters, but they doesn't have the rigor behind them to bet your >> business in them. >>=20 >>=20 > I think you are completely off-track here and jumping to conclusions. Big > business are already betting on it. HBase is becoming a big user of Hadoo= p > (dunno whether Y! uses HBase) and I completely agree with Ian that all > business have to anyway test their release themselves before using it, > otherwise you could land up with data loss like the type you mentioned. >=20 > thanks, > dhruba --- Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com From general-return-2807-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 19:59:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29450 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:59:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 35394 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35349 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35341 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 19:59:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:59:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:59:50 +0000 Received: by qwh6 with SMTP id 6so3094989qwh.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:59:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=d/H2sdaVhdkZ6+o1nnewax2gdewCtRXeH2P9MBJPX80=; b=HO6leF1ZZXzvlfsY+J/R2DKOM2Am5LEDqlMlweGU48SZrbe0U26eIufsRndHPy9Ij6 BCXz7FSAcXsTbEAZ1qiw6He48LXhPtlNth6+Q97y6j3hlMhU/uIaJlWlckJ5ftWbkq0u cJ+gBurgkQDGyYQTB+6wgfkyGyUolzkUdPtUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T4Us6/3uFNgVey4czQE047jZGYYEYMm0ePv3wZ88Dsn1byEFFFEIJEW2QVCFkPnV6Q 7NHKX9b3lBty9C7KI2YKmlsXoU1Ot4ZgBnAi2rfC2DNv6jtpgB7q/a1V0NKNK7XLJR+t dqPFMAYfUWjxrrrV9OZBd2/zkcxG9UBaGy6XA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.130 with SMTP id a2mr1073704qab.33.1295035168979; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.185.129 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:59:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:59:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cf74637fa350499d3df66 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015175cf74637fa350499d3df66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On the flipside, right now it's only the developers, QAs and release engineers. There hasn't been much movement to 0.21 yet, and if we're agreed on the change in general, then pushing out 0.22 without it means making users change everything twice. On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze < s29752-hadoopgeneral@yahoo.com> wrote: > This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release > engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for > this > change. Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools > using > the Apache svn URLs. So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this > since, > as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will > create > more work for the community. > > Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term > target is to release these 3 projects independently? > > Nicholas > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level > > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > > > Hi Nigel, > > > >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what > >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. > Many > >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a > splitting > >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of > that. > > > > Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? > What the > > > > problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. > > Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing > these 3 > projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released > as a > unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can > weigh > in with additional thoughts. > > > You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should > first > > > > understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. > > What do you see as the huge impact? > > Nige > --0015175cf74637fa350499d3df66-- From general-return-2808-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 20:01:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30236 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 20:01:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 20:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 39498 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 20:01:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38849 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 20:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38841 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 20:01:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:01:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,LONG_TERM_PRICE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 20:01:31 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0EK0xZq009891 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:00:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295035259; bh=e/zQMBcgS7OCPipXsi33Vh/yQe4dRJzTNCePqEoty+I=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version; b=B6rhGi/7QWG5mzExlrwg+FSCcJ+YrmxvmAayYsLswWxq+5Yh20g7dyh7E/KfxabWI lDIZLQxm1WLm77FIaCXqc/nqT+Xc2tLFPitLWOLIbh65+f+RdvtIIzZi70wnMSgBCQ 22cpXIG21KiWP4OisTUxI/xJ+GfmjHalqKoMMa5U= Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:00:58 -0800 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:00:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Index: Acu0JPE9V+5Y1kmVRK+IyQlw/77BNQAANFBL Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C955EB7A2E753sureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C955EB7A2E753sureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like the idea of merging projects together. It save a lot of time. However, I would like to see a detailed proposal on how this will be done a= nd discussions on it, before moving forward on this. If this work is done, = need clear messages to the developers on what has changed, and how developm= ent process is affected. These details were missing when project split was = done, causing great deal of confusion and pain. We should also address the following: # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are not = ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result in = tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How do= we reconcile them? On 1/14/11 11:53 AM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" wrote: This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for thi= s change. Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools u= sing the Apache svn URLs. So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this si= nce, as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will cre= ate more work for the community. Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term target is to release these 3 projects independently? Nicholas ________________________________ From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > Hi Nigel, > >> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. M= any >> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitt= ing >> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of tha= t. > > Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? Wh= at the > > problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing thes= e 3 projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released a= s a unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can = weigh in with additional thoughts. > You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should= first > > understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. What do you see as the huge impact? Nige --_000_C955EB7A2E753sureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2809-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 21:39:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92215 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 21:39:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 21:39:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 54607 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 21:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 21:39:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54501 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 21:39:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:39:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:39:35 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3306983iwn.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:39:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+5tuv4Aiqux9Q7a2XGyg0966wV2T/bvdUo5ppO+Am+g=; b=o4c7C7Ms6YwvqKb3p1s/s3MmzRylmfZB/7FUmAvx7nUTmlY/yfeSPwGJnqmV0lqA2W IUZj7tM1NxEqB0LeZsezsjt9G3sF0r7uzf7+eizsrk4RarTaRL+Z7RsG7MKu/tqj2/sv p4OMX8TVDLbWAFlfy04OnhtXob+WxzdDKX63U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uDEJPt2408+aG9vKlk2N8P3ukbDkKtaFyFsGuW2qGa9GzpbSNUHeWjhREgOowtwlK+ dbYKEU9cv1Q/pRE/XpFUlVzllOM6nvhmoFzyGU4ta2gH6XCWCwU31zDlP1uuhIk0gggn cB+XdFxSodMbPFyCzm7Gzis99gtaG+1pqgjhY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.205 with SMTP id n13mr1256154iby.58.1295041154589; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.38.3 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:39:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:39:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 the post split scripts are the worst things ever. From general-return-2810-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 14 22:14:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16856 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 22:14:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2011 22:14:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 95855 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 22:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95625 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95609 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2011 22:14:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:14:34 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so1789101ewy.35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:14:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=55X24eyMm7VOEkzVsB5umNLu2LWRg9NZAMFbiYp1kZo=; b=ta+bCLpU8cQ+LLnknI1qVThJN2kTRLz/seyD/3F7Xgj9nexY7Q0DVK6lZ0Sc97hayn PCM+DBXjNGrKQnJJg2jOGXWWd07nfeTyAjAiaMwxEdYRuigRId17leOlgBWN+NSBdZhW GolF8AOx4GX1J4oSJYIdxPNEi48i1U1nOB3fg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=eK3bpeYIIV8KmGdLauFLWOKC+LXR4IFbLpG46UCuhNzYb9RbdktthTQxWfizZLodGH fW+yVT/Sddc918jC7b556ssh9miLWuGTLMWWA+hyWxeL4Go4nHJx1zV5WMHP37awCm7m 5aaCEdKkdKGtvn+EuPrKZfl5LSlV0wERiaD74= Received: by 10.204.81.218 with SMTP id y26mr898682bkk.146.1295043253651; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:14:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.61.138 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:13:53 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: SF Hadoop meetup report To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a3a41a483a0499d5c12e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d9a3a41a483a0499d5c12e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, This week we held the inaugural SF Hadoop meetup, and it was a great success! About forty people attended, and we held a number of great discussions. After an initial plenary session, an agenda was quickly drawn up and we identified a number of interesting topics. We spent the rest of the time in small groups, delving into these subjects in greater depth. Break-out sessions included: * Hive and near-time data * Access to Hadoop for non-technical users * What are "Hadoopable problems" * Data ingestion best practices * Haderp: When Hadoop goes horribly wrong * HBase schema design best practices * Care and feeding of your Hadoop cluster A big thanks to everyone who came to this meeting; it was truly "user powered" and everyone's efforts contributed to the success we saw. I would once again like to thank Rapleaf for hosting and Cloudera for sponsoring the event. Based on the outcome of this event, we will definitely hold another SF Hadoop meetup in the near future. I will send out another announcement when details on time and location are available. Regards, - Aaron Kimball --0016e6d9a3a41a483a0499d5c12e-- From general-return-2811-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 15 10:20:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20492 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2011 10:20:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2011 10:20:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 74652 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 10:20:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73924 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 10:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73902 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2011 10:20:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:20:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 10:20:40 +0000 Received: from 28-176.76-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.76.176.28] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pe3F2-00082G-7G; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:20:16 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: infrastructure-dev@apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, dev@zookeeper.apache.org Subject: Example of patch history in Gerrit Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:20:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101151120.06407.thomas@koch.ro> Hi, as already written, I've setup a test instance of gerrit[1] (The GIT based review and repository management tool) on my server: http://koch.ro:8080 [1] http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentation/2.1.6/index.html However if you like, you may get a better impression of gerrit by looking at the installation at eclipse: http://egit.eclipse.org In particular, I've found an example of a patch with several versions: http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,1320 In the diff view you see "patch history" in the upper left corner. There you can select to view the diff between two different versions of the patch. (Disclaimer: I'm just advertising gerrit as an interested individual. There isn't any decision from infra@a.o yet.) Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-2812-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 15 16:39:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51870 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2011 16:39:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2011 16:39:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 84420 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 16:39:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83997 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 16:39:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83989 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2011 16:39:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:39:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.176] (HELO mail-ey0-f176.google.com) (209.85.215.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:39:05 +0000 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so1957561eyz.35 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 08:38:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=b5VvFmqTcb6SwrySO8L7r4g1ZFT0+q2ZPFjtRQ+0Ij8=; b=HcLG2uMkfFAa41aO12yOB88qsPJb1GelhDT8v8FLBhi/OedUSRkMG6JBkSQXYh/tNQ hoBDygWpH8gzeuia08TKy58rRbB/gdao68U0V9b6yQFZNcAvRStBOSUQmJkbGYByJc75 oJCVmbQMHE7G9+9zeBDSc2tqCo80VaJIxKrxk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Wn+HR4lQkM2tJo7SHvoIiLaipLWbxQkt7Mkzgd7CY9BNIEJrNhoChxK9IGLFtw17au V9Mgd7WBU+KKMpWHLv9ty+uV7SmZmrAl1dHwqhih7w/s8/MraLA4HyI/FwoYjY7veiWO a8kQ0l+DDAN6KHEFiJ8r84WdaMEJNgQ2cnSds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.33.69 with SMTP id g5mr790291ebd.23.1295109525088; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 08:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.11 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 08:38:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201101151120.06407.thomas@koch.ro> References: <201101151120.06407.thomas@koch.ro> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:38:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Example of patch history in Gerrit From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org, thomas@koch.ro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2011-01-15, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > as already written, I've setup a test instance of gerrit[1] (The GIT based > review and repository management tool) on my server: http://koch.ro:8080 > > [1] http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentation/2.1.6/index.html > > However if you like, you may get a better impression of gerrit by looking at > the installation at eclipse: > http://egit.eclipse.org > > In particular, I've found an example of a patch with several versions: > http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,1320 > > In the diff view you see "patch history" in the upper left corner. There you > can select to view the diff between two different versions of the patch. > > (Disclaimer: I'm just advertising gerrit as an interested individual. There > isn't any decision from infra@a.o yet.) > > Best regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro > -- Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com From general-return-2813-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 16 22:58:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97318 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2011 22:58:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2011 22:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 81363 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2011 22:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81309 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2011 22:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81300 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2011 22:58:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:58:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:58:15 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4695904wwd.29 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:57:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+f83rNGRHeWilpkj+RGiCr+cMYlU1clSl9W6icqtg5k=; b=c5F12880u0mBmzEPPBDx36TgqzKNiWUo72R9+0+8bSNKrt5H0Sjg9Fi683BfhdN4To z/regKQaOn5hq3ZMklH7C7usoiP7J6izjhzPFlvm36qD3IGjkiYoZEx8j7GB8XAxl3NO uuFacXWJqBTxK7gFJmaMQ1jFZLZU9Mnz9ZHQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=AHh7tHVbJG6ea2kyG9j5DHQGFY6lndgKfMS+2BCvQlITYydGQuJM+a6Hnq/cqXITjE gLLcnMTSkbYLOW/Vv/SFgSHz2McZAqz2oa7tmta/S2DUqinBSHVFj/rdNDDxlTG7TLaa khdrcKZtv3VXfT95eTqHxgXSziM7tm2eC0VmI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.4.82 with SMTP id 60mr1613876wei.89.1295218673934; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:57:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:57:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:57:53 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YUeeGxiaghr6RbaMLjiOspmvuws Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > 2) append is hard. It is so hard we rewrote the entire write pipeline (5 = person-years work) in trunk after giving up on the codeline you are suggest= ing we merge in. That work is what distinguishes all post 20 releases from = 20 releases in my mind. I dont trust the 20 append code line. We've been hu= rt badly by it. =A0We did the rewrite only after losing a bunch of producti= on data a bunch of times with the previous code line. =A0I think the variou= s 20 append patch lines may be fine for specialized hbase clusters, but the= y doesn't have the rigor behind them to bet your business in them. > Eric: A few comments on the above: + Append has had a bunch of work done on it since the Y! dataloss of a few years ago on an ancestor of the branch-0.20-append codebase (IIRC the issue you refer to in particular -- the 'dataloss' because partially written blocks were done up in tmp dirs, and on cluster restart, tmp data was cleared -- has been fixed in branch-0.20.append). + You may not trust 0.20-append (or its close cousin over in CDH) but a bunch of HBasers do. On the one hand, we have little choice. Until the *new* append becomes available in a stable Hadoop the HBase project has had to sustain itself (What you think?, 3-6 months before we see 0.22? HBase project can't hold its breath that long). On other hand, the branch-0.20-append work has been carried out by lads (and lasses!) who know their HDFS. Its true that it will not have been tested with Y! rigor but near-derivatives -- CDH or the FB branches -- already do HDFS-200-based append in production. St.Ack P.S. Don't get me wrong. HBase is looking forward to *new* append. We just need something to suck on meantime. From general-return-2814-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 20:00:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91168 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 20:00:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 20:00:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 28804 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28712 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28704 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 20:00:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:00:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:00:11 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF6001GMNH25F70@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:58:15 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-17_08:2011-01-17,2011-01-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170123 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:58:06 -0800 Message-id: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <2C71D87C-D7BF-4993-B0F9-05E455E9CC77@mac.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Eric, Arun, I'd like to explicitly clarify one aspect of this branch and what you mean by 'release' -- it can have many meanings. Are you asking to actually create an Apache release from this branch (binary & source)? Or, as I was assuming, simply commit all this code to this branch and leave it there without a formal release so others can role their own binary if they wish? Thanks, Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Yup. Letting people who want to contribute, do so a good meme! > > A stable next release would be great. But orgs do sustaining on stable code releases for a lot of very good reasons. > > A next Hadoop 21+ of this code quality is almost a year away in my opinion. > > --- > E14 - via iPhone > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:05 AM, "Jakob Homan" wrote: > >>> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. >> >> Not all are. I'm against it for the all the same reasons I was >> against 20 append. This is also being used as a wedge to get the >> append work in as .200. My position is that every iota effort of >> releasing another 20 branch is an iota not spent on getting us a >> kick-ass 22. 20 was great, and we had a lot of wonderful times >> together, but it's time to move on and see other releases. >> >> But, this is a volunteer effort, and if others want to put the effort >> in, they're free to do so. >> -jg >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> Yup, I'll say it again. The process ain't perfect but it's good enough IMO. Thank you Yahoo! for your contribution. >>> >>> Clearly these patch will need review before commit when going into trunk. >>> >>> Let's move on to 0.22. >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> I tend to second most of Ian's points here. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:14, Ian Holsman wrote: >>>>> (with my Apache hat on) >>>>> I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (as opposed to a series of smaller patches). >>>> >>>> #1: we are creating a precedent of a "brain-dump" here. Although, it >>>> isn't the first one in the history of OSS. Infamous Apple "patch" to >>>> OpenBSD is another one ;) >>>> >>>> #2: How to spell 'back door' any one? >>>> >>>> #5: "almost 10 internal releases" Arun has mentioned above might be, >>>> perhaps, considered as a great quality control effort. Also, not to >>>> mention virtual impossibility to create a test plan to validate a >>>> giant features patch. >>>> >>>>> BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >>>>> >>>>> On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, most people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a major feature and we are all gung ho for it.. >>>> >>>> And this ^^^ >>>> >>>> But, hey I guess it's totally worth it! >>>> Cos >>>> >>>>> --Ian >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>>>>>> security+append!) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Super! >>>>>> >>>>>> Arun >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> From general-return-2815-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 20:11:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3268 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 20:11:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 20:11:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 45583 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:11:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45511 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:11:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45503 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 20:11:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:11:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:11:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 3228 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 20:11:31 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:11:31 +0000 Message-ID: <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:11:28 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/12/2011 11:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this can > done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and beyond. > > However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced in > the CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of the > release. This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this ensures > that we can track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. > > Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to brainstorm. We would not release this until each change in it has been reviewed by the community, right? Otherwise we may end up with changes in a 0.20 release that don't get approved when they're contributed to trunk and cause trunk to regress. So I don't yet see the point of committing the mega patch since the community needs to review each individual change anyway, so we might wait until each is reviewed to commit it. That said, posting the mega patch is useful, so that folks can start to pick it apart into separate issues. Pushing your internal commits to a public github branch might also make that review process easier. Doug From general-return-2816-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 20:22:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7765 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 20:22:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 20:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 58584 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:22:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58519 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 20:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58511 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 20:22:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:22:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.99 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.99] (HELO asmtpout024.mac.com) (17.148.16.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:22:09 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-18.01 64bit (built Jul 15 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF600LZSOKBKQQ0@asmtp024.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:49 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-17_08:2011-01-17,2011-01-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170123 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:46 -0800 Message-id: <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 01/12/2011 11:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this can >> done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and beyond. >> >> However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced in >> the CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of the >> release. This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this ensures >> that we can track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. >> >> Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to brainstorm. > > We would not release this until each change in it has been reviewed by the community, right? Otherwise we may end up with changes in a 0.20 release that don't get approved when they're contributed to trunk and cause trunk to regress. So I don't yet see the point of committing the mega patch since the community needs to review each individual change anyway, so we might wait until each is reviewed to commit it. Unless this is a code-only drop into a branch w/ no formal Apache release. If that's the case then I'm +1 on letting them commit in this way this one time so we can all move on to 0.22. Nige From general-return-2817-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 22:57:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4417 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 22:57:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 22:57:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 60804 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60761 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60753 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 22:57:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:57:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:57:36 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0HMut5D094448 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.244.133) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:56:54 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:56:51 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Folks, We are very interested in sharing what we are doing with the community. = I think we can separate this into multiple stages. 1) To doug's point - Yes, absolutely, we want folks to review this. The = patch is now available. Lets work together to get it formatted as folks = like in subversion and reviewed. Where there are issues, let's work to = resolve them. With luck folks will find this work consistent and = useful. Backwards compatibility has been a goal, so with luck we will = not ID regressions. As todd mentioned earlier point, a lot of this work = has already been merged into CDH and all of it has been reviewed by = several apache committers already.=20 2) This code works, it is the best hadoop we know of. If you run a = business on hadoop, I think you would benefit from using it. Right now = you don't have the choice of an Apache release if you are looking for a = stabilized modern version of Hadoop. We would like to make apache = releases based on it, source and binary, incorporating bugfixes from = everyone. To do that we would of course need to follow the Apache = Hadoop release process, which requires the release master to produce a = release candidate and the PMC to vote on the release. Since that will = require a formal future vote, no one will be surprised! 3) To nigel's point - I don't think this should distract anyone from = working on 22 or other Hadoop contributions. The 22 team will have the = option of incorporating this work. We think it will be a better = release if they do, but that is their choice. The majority of out = effort at yahoo is not going into 0.20 (this branch), we are working on = future features for hadoop. This is branch is the stable code we use = while we are waiting for a new release. Thanks, E14 On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >=20 >> On 01/12/2011 11:07 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >>> Thus, I think a jumbo patch should suffice. It will also ensure this = can >>> done quickly so that the community can then concentrate on 0.22 and = beyond. >>>=20 >>> However, I will (manually) ensure all relevant jiras are referenced = in >>> the CHANGES.txt and Release Notes for folks to see the contents of = the >>> release. This is the hardest part of the exercise. Also, this = ensures >>> that we can track these jiras for 0.22 as Eli suggested. >>>=20 >>> Does that seem like a reasonable way forward? I'm happy to = brainstorm. >>=20 >> We would not release this until each change in it has been reviewed = by the community, right? Otherwise we may end up with changes in a 0.20 = release that don't get approved when they're contributed to trunk and = cause trunk to regress. So I don't yet see the point of committing the = mega patch since the community needs to review each individual change = anyway, so we might wait until each is reviewed to commit it. >=20 > Unless this is a code-only drop into a branch w/ no formal Apache = release. If that's the case then I'm +1 on letting them commit in this = way this one time so we can all move on to 0.22. >=20 > Nige >=20 From general-return-2818-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 23:29:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22113 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 23:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 23:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 85964 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 23:29:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85909 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 23:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85901 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 23:29:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:29:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:29:41 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0HNTEVu007585 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:29:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.244.133) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:29:13 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:29:10 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1BBA9772-9F30-44A1-A979-387D7891903E@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Stack, I feel your pain. We're running a 700 node HBASE cluster containing a = HUGE collections of all web pages. Both versions of append were started = by engineers working at yahoo and we've put A LOT of investment into = both. I really, really want to see the append issue solved for HBASE!! =20= My point is simply that we need to separate our concerns. I would 300% = support a community of folks building a 0.20 derived version of hadoop = with append and we know that any new release post 0.20 will contain an = append solution. This branch is more backwards facing. We are simply = trying to share our last two years of 0.20 experience with the = community, so that a) folks can use it if they find value in it, b) this = work can be merged into future hadoop releases (that will have append). We want to share what we have tested, since we believe that the testing = is a good chunk of our contribution. Thanks, E14 On Jan 16, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler > wrote: >> 2) append is hard. It is so hard we rewrote the entire write pipeline = (5 person-years work) in trunk after giving up on the codeline you are = suggesting we merge in. That work is what distinguishes all post 20 = releases from 20 releases in my mind. I dont trust the 20 append code = line. We've been hurt badly by it. We did the rewrite only after losing = a bunch of production data a bunch of times with the previous code line. = I think the various 20 append patch lines may be fine for specialized = hbase clusters, but they doesn't have the rigor behind them to bet your = business in them. >>=20 >=20 > Eric: >=20 > A few comments on the above: >=20 > + Append has had a bunch of work done on it since the Y! dataloss of a > few years ago on an ancestor of the branch-0.20-append codebase (IIRC > the issue you refer to in particular -- the 'dataloss' because > partially written blocks were done up in tmp dirs, and on cluster > restart, tmp data was cleared -- has been fixed in > branch-0.20.append). > + You may not trust 0.20-append (or its close cousin over in CDH) but > a bunch of HBasers do. On the one hand, we have little choice. Until > the *new* append becomes available in a stable Hadoop the HBase > project has had to sustain itself (What you think?, 3-6 months before > we see 0.22? HBase project can't hold its breath that long). On > other hand, the branch-0.20-append work has been carried out by lads > (and lasses!) who know their HDFS. Its true that it will not have > been tested with Y! rigor but near-derivatives -- CDH or the FB > branches -- already do HDFS-200-based append in production. >=20 > St.Ack > P.S. Don't get me wrong. HBase is looking forward to *new* append. > We just need something to suck on meantime. From general-return-2819-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 17 23:50:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25930 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2011 23:50:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2011 23:50:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 4305 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4193 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4185 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 23:50:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:50:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:50:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 25870 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2011 23:49:57 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:49:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4D34D59F.4010802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 01/17/2011 02:56 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > 1) To doug's point - Yes, absolutely, we want folks to review this. > The patch is now available. Lets work together to get it formatted > as folks like in subversion and reviewed. Where there are issues, > let's work to resolve them. With luck folks will find this work > consistent and useful. The question I was addressing was whether to commit the mega-patch as-is, or attempt to linearize it into a sequence of patches, one per issue addressed by the mega patch. I believe that, as-is, it is probably too big to review as a unit. I don't see that merely naming the changes in it makes it substantially easier to review. Rather, each issue probably needs to be associated with a distinct patch in order to permit independent review. > Backwards compatibility has been a goal, so > with luck we will not ID regressions. My point was that, in addition to back-compatibility with prior 0.20 releases, we must also consider the forward-compatibility of each change with 0.21, 0.22 and trunk. > As todd mentioned earlier > point, a lot of this work has already been merged into CDH and all of > it has been reviewed by several apache committers already. Right, but review must be in public, so that everyone in the community has an equal chance to be involved in the development of each change. Doug From general-return-2820-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 01:08:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67657 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 01:08:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 01:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 80983 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:08:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80893 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80872 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 01:08:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:08:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charles.fg@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:08:35 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6069948iyb.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=whay88gx6cx+bCHvU3+OzgrpqlSgouUnCIv9zrZbRCY=; b=mM41LZYDC8xa8EnR+GqJkSKKJC+JzQqhM6Aya8d+vtcRBMHUp3DK4nr/Tz8CXBUfvh RomLXwSfy0FLtrofaJiDinnCeCb8twxgG/elRNerB147jRhlUqV0L1lig3vhhcwtfTK5 gfyPx5JXir2Ye+4d783+3VajJZ/MIPt1v6cq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=JEK/dHSP/UXvznyg4zsNPhJ/Rm99PuEqYz/o9ae5F/eeYRKPzSHjB56+4O439kebbv C4IS6Wpaa5SispQNUEX3pwCGIYSglGOlPBdjm4P6+3Dbkb1nus+wokUkv7tEx/45I9ds l8NAopGjpsw3BkXunp5Ynz8ldSONlLQ4Doi8s= Received: by 10.42.164.132 with SMTP id g4mr5336965icy.127.1295312894462; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.167.194 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:07:54 -0800 (PST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Charles_Gon=E7alves?= Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:07:54 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Manage a cluster where not all machines are always available To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e85f2f2890b049a148811 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e85f2f2890b049a148811 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guys, I'm running a series of pig scripts in a cluster with a dozen of machines. The problem is that those machines belongs to a lab in my University and sometimes not all them are available for my use. What is the best approach to manage the configuration and the data on hdfs on this enviroment? Can I simply remove the busy servers from the slaves file and start the hdf= s and mapred and if needed perform a : hadoop balancer Can you see a problem in this approach ? Can anyone see another way!? --=20 *Charles Ferreira Gon=E7alves * http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~charles/ UFMG - ICEx - Dcc Cel.: 55 31 87741485 Tel.: 55 31 34741485 Lab.: 55 31 34095840 --90e6ba6e85f2f2890b049a148811-- From general-return-2821-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 01:34:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72116 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 01:34:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 01:34:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 2832 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:34:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2780 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:34:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2772 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 01:34:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:33:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:33:53 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0I14VMx028218 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:04:31 -0600 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 58FA543C4710 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:33:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id TXERsDUa9cEDRRX5 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:33:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0I1XU9H010215 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:33:31 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:32:33 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:33:30 -0600 Subject: RE: Manage a cluster where not all machines are always available Thread-Topic: Manage a cluster where not all machines are always available Thread-Index: Acu2rEi++fsfYDAQT1+7nEC5zADXBQAAW2/o Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DQpDaGFybGVzLA0KDQpJZiBJIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgeW91IGNvcnJlY3RseSB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byB0 cmltIHRoZSBjbHVzdGVyIGRvd24gdG8gb25seSB0aG9zZSBtYWNoaW5lcyB0aGF0IHlvdSBjb250 cm9sLi4uDQoNCk9rLi4uIERvIHlvdSBjYXJlIGFib3V0IHRoZSBkYXRhIHRoYXQgaXMgY3VycmVu dGx5IG9uIHRoZSBjbHVzdGVyPyANCihJcyBhbGwgb2YgdGhlIGRhdGEgeW91cnMsIG9yIHJlcGxh Y2VhYmxlPykNCg0KQ2FuIHlvdSBlYXNpbHkgY29weSB0aGUgZGF0YSBvZmYgdGhlIGNsdXN0ZXIg b24gdG8gcGxhaW4gb2xkIHVuaXggZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0gZGlzayBzcGFjZT8NCg0KSWYgbm90LCB0 aGVuIHlvdSBoYXZlIHRvIGRvIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgb24gYSBOT0RFIGJ5IE5PREUgQmFzaXMu Li4NCkEpIFB1dCB0aGUgbm9kZSBpbiB0aGUgZGZzLmV4bHVkZSBmaWxlIGFuZCByZW1vdmUgZnJv bSB0aGUgc2xhdmVzIGZpbGUuDQpCKSBBcyByb290IHJ1biBraWxsYWxsIC05IGphdmEgdG8gc3Rv cCBhbnkgamF2YSBmcm9tIHJ1bm5pbmcuIChJdCB3aWxsIGVuZCB5b3VyIGRhdGFub2RlIGFuZCB0 YXNrdHJhY2tlciBqb2JzLikNCkMpIFdhaXQgMTAgbWlucyB1bnRpbCB0aGUgam9iIHRyYWNrZXIg YW5kIG5hbWUgbm9kZSBzZWUgdGhlIG5vZGUgYXMgZG93bi4NCkQpIFJ1biBhIGhhZG9vcCBmc2Nr IC8gdG8gZmluZCBhbGwgb2YgdGhlIGZpbGVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIG5vdyBtaXNzaW5nIGEgcmVwbGlj YXRpb24uDQpFKSBSdW4gYmFsYW5jZXIgdG8gcmVwbGljYXRlIHRoZSBtaXNzaW5nIGJsb2NrcyBv biBhIGRpZmZlcmVudCBtYWNoaW5lLg0KDQpPZiBjb3Vyc2UsIGl0IHdvdWxkIGhlbHAgaWYgeW91 IHVwcGVkIHRoZSBiYW5kd2lkdGggdXNlZCBieSB0aGUgYmFsYW5jZXIgdG8gYSBsYXJnZSBudW1i ZXIuIE5vcm1hbGx5IHRoZSBiYWxhbmNlciBpcyBzdXBwb3NlZCB0byBydW4gaW4gdGhlIGJhY2tn cm91bmQsIHNvIGJ5IGRlZmF1bHQgaXRzIHNvbWV0aGluZyBsaWtlIDEgTUIvc2VjLiBJZiB5b3Un dmUgZ290IGEgMUdCIGV0aGVybmV0IGxpbmssIHlvdSBjb3VsZCBlYXNpbHkgcHVzaCB0aGF0IG51 bWJlciB1cCB0byAxMDAgb3IgMjAwIE1CL3NlYy4gVGhlbiB3aGVuIHlvdSBydW4gdGhlIGJhbGFu Y2VyLCBpdCBtb3ZlcyENCg0KTm90ZTogV2hlbiB3ZSB0cmllZCBkZWNvbW1pc3Npb25pbmcgbm9k ZXMsIEkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyBpZiB3ZSBoYWQgY2hhbmdlZCB0aGlzIHBhcmFtZXRlciwgYnV0IGl0 IHdhcyB0YWtpbmcgJ3dlZWtzJyB0byBkZWNvbW1pc3Npb24gYSBub2RlLiAoWW91ciBNaWxlYWdl IE1heSBWYXJ5KS4gTm90IHN1cmUgaWYgdGhlIGxvbmcgdGltZSB3YXMgZHVlIHRvIHRoaXMgcGFy YW1ldGVyIGJlaW5nIHNvIGxvdywgb3Igc29tZXRoaW5nIGVsc2UuIA0KDQpXaGF0IEkgbGlzdGVk IGFib3ZlIHNob3VsZCB3b3JrLiAoRXZlbiBpZiBpdCBpcyBhIGJpdCB1Z2x5LikNCg0KSFRIDQoN Ci1NaWtlDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkZyb206 IENoYXJsZXMgR29u52FsdmVzIFtjaGFybGVzLmZnQGdtYWlsLmNvbV0NClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwg SmFudWFyeSAxNywgMjAxMSA3OjA3IFBNDQpUbzogZ2VuZXJhbEBoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZw0K U3ViamVjdDogTWFuYWdlIGEgY2x1c3RlciB3aGVyZSBub3QgYWxsIG1hY2hpbmVzIGFyZSBhbHdh eXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlDQoNCkhpIEd1eXMsDQoNCkknbSBydW5uaW5nIGEgc2VyaWVzIG9mIHBpZyBz Y3JpcHRzIGluIGEgY2x1c3RlciB3aXRoIGEgZG96ZW4gb2YgbWFjaGluZXMuDQpUaGUgcHJvYmxl bSBpcyB0aGF0IHRob3NlIG1hY2hpbmVzIGJlbG9uZ3MgdG8gYSBsYWIgaW4gbXkgVW5pdmVyc2l0 eSBhbmQNCnNvbWV0aW1lcyBub3QgYWxsIHRoZW0gYXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBmb3IgbXkgdXNlLg0K V2hhdCBpcyB0aGUgYmVzdCBhcHByb2FjaCB0byBtYW5hZ2UgdGhlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gYW5k IHRoZSBkYXRhIG9uIGhkZnMNCm9uIHRoaXMgZW52aXJvbWVudD8NCg0KQ2FuIEkgc2ltcGx5IHJl bW92ZSB0aGUgYnVzeSBzZXJ2ZXJzIGZyb20gdGhlIHNsYXZlcyBmaWxlIGFuZCBzdGFydCB0aGUg aGRmcw0KYW5kIG1hcHJlZCAgYW5kIGlmIG5lZWRlZCBwZXJmb3JtIGEgOg0KaGFkb29wIGJhbGFu Y2VyDQoNCkNhbiB5b3Ugc2VlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSBpbiB0aGlzIGFwcHJvYWNoID8NCkNhbiBhbnlv bmUgc2VlIGFub3RoZXIgd2F5IT8NCg0KDQoNCg0KLS0NCipDaGFybGVzIEZlcnJlaXJhIEdvbudh bHZlcyAqDQpodHRwOi8vaG9tZXBhZ2VzLmRjYy51Zm1nLmJyL35jaGFybGVzLw0KVUZNRyAtIElD RXggLSBEY2MNCkNlbC46IDU1IDMxIDg3NzQxNDg1DQpUZWwuOiAgNTUgMzEgMzQ3NDE0ODUNCkxh Yi46IDU1IDMxIDM0MDk1ODQwDQoNCg0KVGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGNvbnRhaW5lZCBpbiB0aGlz IGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gbWF5IGJlIENPTkZJREVOVElBTCBhbmQgaXMgaW50ZW5kZWQgb25seSBm b3IgdGhlIHVzZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVjaXBpZW50KHMpIG5hbWVkIGFib3ZlLiAgSWYgeW91IGFyZSBu b3QgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudCwgeW91IGFyZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQgdGhhdCBh bnkgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLCBvciBjb3B5aW5nIG9mIHRoaXMgY29tbXVu aWNhdGlvbiwgb3IgYW55IG9mIGl0cyBjb250ZW50cywgaXMgc3RyaWN0bHkgcHJvaGliaXRlZC4g IElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgY29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBpbiBlcnJvciwgcGxlYXNl IG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc2VuZGVyIGFuZCBkZWxldGUvZGVzdHJveSB0aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwgbWVzc2Fn ZSBhbmQgYW55IGNvcHkgb2YgaXQgZnJvbSB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyIG9yIHBhcGVyIGZpbGVzLg0K From general-return-2822-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 01:42:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73096 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 01:42:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 01:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7361 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:42:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7146 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 01:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7138 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 01:42:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:42:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:42:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 73006 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 01:41:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:41:55 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so5986565iwn.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:41:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.35.204 with SMTP id q12mr5109624ibd.191.1295314914386; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:41:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:41:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > We would not release this until each change in it has been reviewed by th= e > community, right? =A0Otherwise we may end up with changes in a 0.20 relea= se > that don't get approved when they're contributed to trunk and cause trunk= to > regress. =A0So I don't yet see the point of committing the mega patch sin= ce > the community needs to review each individual change anyway, so we might > wait until each is reviewed to commit it. I share this concern. Releasing an omnibus pile of commits in the 0.20 series will create an impossible situation for the mainline. Worse, the alternative sifts through this pile over months, as the refinements wrought by consensus require remerging and revalidating of each issue. Every subsequent issue must also be reconsidered. The product must then be deployed, tested, and its bugs fixed, just to get a release as battle-hardened as this one. Signing up for all this work when most every developer and user would rather see trunk proceed would be madness. However, the status quo is also unacceptable. Running any version of Apache Hadoop is rare, when compared to the popularity of its variants. We must find a solution to that. Hadoop is not in good shape right now, and exceptional actions to correct it should not be cast off lightly by valuing consistency over its future. To address Nigel and Doug's concerns about compatibility, we should consider a different release series. We wanted to postpone 1.0 discussions, but that would be one solution. If a secure 0.20 could be released as 1.0, then if interest in this branch persists, append could be a 1.1 release on this series,* etc. while 0.22 and its successors can be 2.0 (as a rare benefit to the project split, one could argue that "Hadoop" is the unified set, and the Common, HDFS, and MapReduce projects could continue to release on the 0.x series until we want to declare those a stable successor to 0.20). Version numbers are pretty cheap, when compared to our time and focus. * In the interim, a 0.20-append release would make all kinds of sense, and fie on the niceties of naming. > That said, posting the mega patch is useful, so that folks can start to p= ick > it apart into separate issues. =A0Pushing your internal commits to a publ= ic > github branch might also make that review process easier. Pushing to github caused this problem. CDH rebased on YDH, and today Apache Hadoop is considered less stable, less tested, and less usable than either one of them. Why one would expect things to work differently this time around is not clear. I assume we all agree it's a poor outcome. Arun already volunteered to break up the commits and push individual patches to the repository, so the history is manageable. We allow CTR for branches, though it's predicated on the assumption that that work will be spread over weeks or months; development should not be batched this way. However, by adding obstacles to an unambiguously positive outcome, collaborators will be skeptical of engaging more deeply with this community. Let's focus on making forward progress, not on ensuring the requisite pain is felt. -C From general-return-2823-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 02:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95159 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 02:56:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 02:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 48093 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 02:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48036 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 02:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48028 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 02:56:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:56:10 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas03.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.35]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I2tOAe045256 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:55:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS07.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.26]) by SP2-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.35]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:55:23 -0800 From: Todd Papaioannou To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:55:22 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu2uyamIJc5VpY2R0ih27883g+MZQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D34D59F.4010802@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C95A3F703A81toddpyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C95A3F703A81toddpyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's only true if you plan to pull forward the changes wholesale into .21= , .22 and beyond. And that is not what is being proposed. If the plan is to just land an updated and more stable version of .20 that = is completely backwards compatible, then this can be done within that code = line without any impact to the end users. Any changes that the community wi= sh to pull forward can be identified, isolated and reviewed per the normal = process. Or they can remain in the .20.100 release for eternity, without an= y impact on the future. Either way, the .20 release will be more stable, performant and more useful= to our users, and the community at large can focus on releasing .22, which= we all believe is the right goal. ToddP From: Doug Cutting > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0800 To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Backwards compatibility has been a goal, so with luck we will not ID regressions. My point was that, in addition to back-compatibility with prior 0.20 releases, we must also consider the forward-compatibility of each change with 0.21, 0.22 and trunk. --_000_C95A3F703A81toddpyahooinccom_-- From general-return-2824-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 03:05:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4633 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 03:05:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 03:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 53677 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 03:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53397 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 03:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53389 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 03:05:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:05:09 +0000 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so2171969ywo.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:04:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eTQRI7RIajUhCURXURVDn4epunOjpGMXsvi0Mlp/rrE=; b=Ktm729JfX7Y0iUZJDdsdZXpjSZnlXWqFsqp7KlRO8kzFvWZOrIenGvUuGXocSSaJh9 E6qCQrae+ROaW9IFpz5lj1zGdVZGJFP90EioQ/d4WRFrn47cKgMLYsC20+uo6JO0b5un TKL23xz/RWC5Wrso1XVBLgGaX3Mv9zL2doMCU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OIa13SquPOJyK+xeZWw1NsbnwM4wwsiJGYUgxYwGIs6ZvSy9+DKPAHmH9PUNMSDCBf sEeALgOdnPUhu/vi6Tpl5not6E6ttyqYe2+Box+GD0SsjqAavwACuy2KIEe8eHBCGXAg pg/vdDAi29wGbIiXLWZrAqtiONAEPhHefHLKI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.185.4 with SMTP id i4mr507442ybf.205.1295319888778; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.201.20 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:04:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:04:48 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: how to know which partition data the reduce receive From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4d53cd75682049a16291b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd4d53cd75682049a16291b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is job that has three reduce tasks that is the map output data are divided into three partition, how can I know every reduce receive which partition= =A3=BF --000e0cd4d53cd75682049a16291b-- From general-return-2825-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 03:44:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13571 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 03:44:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 03:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 68834 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 03:44:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68541 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 03:44:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68533 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 03:44:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:44:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:44:33 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so7140075fxm.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:44:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PZn3Sh60UfP7fy11nhcje06Q06yI+VyLoupH+orP1zE=; b=nQSvY5RK+s2Xrh3OZotc2SjZ95IaRp0uZ4ZXVjqVlIqa7suoL6aDaWLq0IK0dNetdJ ZyfUYIC5lPQI35juGnnyPPCsrh1NHjL2BBIN/WaYlJsUt1unjQ/fVw782jZpwGDEyx8M qLR/x5cntAM2Wm4q6QzXU7SQkXVtyk1CVrXJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FL/9tTfgiJcmVh36W9GcthQPC1fXgsGM043xPN1qV/1aH59lzbwj+5bu0ZTukGeUBU oPuuKOMCrkBY3src2187i2wnSMPHHgjaePlsgztbkI02updeyc/4oLso9rogo1hz67UZ FedFWoKpv34cpuBNtWpCC4hACHf63OoDhwOFs= Received: by 10.223.85.203 with SMTP id p11mr5576074fal.108.1295322252702; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:44:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.200 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:43:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:13:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to know which partition data the reduce receive To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The emitted Partition Number =3D=3D Reducers' ID. 2011/1/18 lei liu : > There is job that has three reduce tasks that is the map output data > are divided > into three partition, how can I know every reduce receive which partitio= n=EF=BC=9F > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2826-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 04:31:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29327 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 04:31:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 04:31:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 96282 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:31:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95936 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:30:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95928 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 04:30:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:30:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=FRT_TODAY2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:30:50 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6094186iwn.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:30:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.213.74 with SMTP id gv10mr5601045icb.213.1295325029967; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:30:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.167.66 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:30:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D34D59F.4010802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:30:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054ac4947a945049a175c33 --20cf3054ac4947a945049a175c33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, We had this exact same discussion about the 0.20-append branch a few weeks ago. A few organizations have tested that code at scale and feel strongly that it's stable. We decided not to release it because it does not meet the Apache guidelines for a release. The Apache process has its pros and cons; we've all accepted them, so the community moved on and focused its energy on the 0.22 release. A few weeks later, we now have another organization claiming that their 0.20-based branch is tested at scale and should be released. It's claimed that 0.20.100 will be "more stable, performant and more useful to our users"; the same can be said of the 0.20-append branch. Neither branch, however, is a bugfix release and thus does not meet the Apache guidelines for a release. That's too bad; we should work to avoid this situation again in the future, but let's not try to change the rules because we did a poor job in the past of getting our work released via Apache. As Nigel mentions, and as was done with 0.20-append, I would fully support a "a code-only drop into a branch w/ no formal Apache release". That's fully compliant with the Apache process. All of these discussions will be moot once we get 0.22 out the door and stop arguing over which organization has the most magical 0.20-based bits. I'm looking forward to seeing all of the Apache Hadoop contributors working full time on that release process once these bits are committed to the 0.20.100 branch. Thanks, Jeff On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Todd Papaioannou wrote: > That's only true if you plan to pull forward the changes wholesale into > .21, .22 and beyond. And that is not what is being proposed. > > If the plan is to just land an updated and more stable version of .20 that > is completely backwards compatible, then this can be done within that code > line without any impact to the end users. Any changes that the community > wish to pull forward can be identified, isolated and reviewed per the normal > process. Or they can remain in the .20.100 release for eternity, without any > impact on the future. > > Either way, the .20 release will be more stable, performant and more useful > to our users, and the community at large can focus on releasing .22, which > we all believe is the right goal. > > ToddP > > From: Doug Cutting > > Reply-To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" < > general@hadoop.apache.org> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0800 > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" < > general@hadoop.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset > > > Backwards compatibility has been a goal, so > with luck we will not ID regressions. > > My point was that, in addition to back-compatibility with prior 0.20 > releases, we must also consider the forward-compatibility of each change > with 0.21, 0.22 and trunk. > --20cf3054ac4947a945049a175c33-- From general-return-2827-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 04:32:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29797 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 04:32:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 04:32:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 98565 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:32:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98304 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98296 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 04:32:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:32:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:32:29 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-77-c11.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.77.11]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I4W2CQ077473 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:32:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295325122; bh=qnyi6UxZDlFLYjrM1ufevjmAR5JsD28NQx104/BTIAI=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=CGU/RKmyoe4HC4ekKEQ8qxrCbX/JNZ7E3culVkM867PWyrBe40y0ODxnzgTmkgd7a aWuWSiOvlNN77Jlaa2UviGeiIwRrd4GDDPlJ6m8gpBoNXPS1yh3ZYZsP+YOFROGtXn FyXCiHVu7nlXZAE1gx/odKW5NIVmb/MnvgxB/B6I= Message-Id: <6250B06D-2502-47E6-950D-3015485C516B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-88--809650960 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:32:08 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-88--809650960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/17/11 12:11 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > > We would not release this until each change in it has been reviewed by > the community, right? Otherwise we may end up with changes in a 0.20 > release that don't get approved when they're contributed to trunk and > cause trunk to regress. So I don't yet see the point of committing > the > mega patch since the community needs to review each individual change > anyway, so we might wait until each is reviewed to commit it. My take is straight-forward: Apache Hadoop hasn't had a stable, updated release in a while. As a result there is too much confusion for the user-community. There are too many releases done by too many entities and nothing is available from Apache, for a long while now. This is a situation we need to rectify, urgently! Engaging in community review of these patches will distract the developer community's attention from 0.22 and the future. Not to mention, it will take forever and keep users hanging. Yes, the mechanics are important - but not more important than the end result. IAC: a) The vast majority of these patches are already on jira, and have been for several, several months now. b) The vast majority of these patches have already been committed to trunk i.e. 0.22. Sure, some patches maybe missing from 0.22 or jira; my proposal is not ideal and - I don't think anyone is pretending it is. However, it does remedy the critical problem - a stable, updated Apache Hadoop release. We can remedy backward or forward compatibility by being clever with our release versions or names. An appeal: Let's use a bit of common sense and get the project moving forward with a release. Folks are welcome to put forward a append release and an append+security release and so forth (I've strongly supported that), not to mention 0.22 and beyond. IMHO, more than one release is definitely better than none. Let's get the ball rolling, please! thanks, Arun --Apple-Mail-88--809650960-- From general-return-2828-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 04:40:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31150 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 04:40:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 04:40:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2605 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2379 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:40:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2370 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 04:40:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:40:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:40:29 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6206410iyb.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:40:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.172.65 with SMTP id m1mr2855201icz.481.1295325609124; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.167.66 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:40:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6250B06D-2502-47E6-950D-3015485C516B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <6250B06D-2502-47E6-950D-3015485C516B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:40:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba613bfccce482049a177e5c --90e6ba613bfccce482049a177e5c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Apache Hadoop hasn't had a stable, updated release in a while. > That's what 0.22 is for? However, it does remedy the critical problem - a stable, updated Apache > Hadoop release. > Again, isn't that what 0.22 is for? > An appeal: Let's use a bit of common sense and get the project moving > forward with a release. Folks are welcome to put forward a append release > and an append+security release and so forth (I've strongly supported that), > not to mention 0.22 and beyond. IMHO, more than one release is definitely > better than none. > Yes, 0.22 has both append and security. 0.22 also has the nice feature of following the Apache release guidelines rather than relying on the patch set of an independent entity, whether it's Cloudera, Facebook, or Yahoo. > Let's get the ball rolling, please! > Agreed! Nigel has done a great job getting the ball rolling on the 0.22 release. I'm looking forward to seeing everyone burn down the blockers that have been identified. Regards, Jeff --90e6ba613bfccce482049a177e5c-- From general-return-2829-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 04:53:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32446 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 04:53:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 04:53:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 9425 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:53:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9230 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 04:53:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9219 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 04:53:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:53:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:53:06 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF7009BCC7TBU70@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:52:42 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170234 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-18_01:2011-01-17,2011-01-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:52:41 -0800 Message-id: <55BC6A08-29CB-47BF-B71B-9A4A79CF89DD@mac.com> References: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Just to be clear, the proposal currently being discussed is NOT a full undo of the split -- it might be better described as a tweak or a bug fix to the (on-going) project split. If someone would like to start a discussion on a complete undo of the project split, please do so under a different thread. Cheers, Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > +1 the post split scripts are the worst things ever. From general-return-2830-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:05:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39022 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:05:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:05:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 17868 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17152 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:05:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17135 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:05:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:05:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:04:57 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF700MC8CRGQ780@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:04:29 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-18_01:2011-01-17,2011-01-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170237 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:04:28 -0800 Message-id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Good questions. Keep them coming! I'll compile a list so we can start an FAQ on this. > # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are not ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? Note, we're not putting them back together. This is NOT a cmd-Z (ctrl-Z) on the project split. It's putting them back under one trunk, but as separate projects underneath that. IMO this is a relatively small change in the universe of undo-the-project-split possibilities. > # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How do we reconcile them? I'd like to keep that issue out of this change if at all possible. I recommend for now we keep the status quo. Thus, even though all committers may technically have permission to commit to all 3 project trees (can someone confirm that?), we would need to rely on the honor system that committers will only commit to their project trees. Cheers, Nige On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > I like the idea of merging projects together. It save a lot of time. > > However, I would like to see a detailed proposal on how this will be done and discussions on it, before moving forward on this. If this work is done, need clear messages to the developers on what has changed, and how development process is affected. These details were missing when project split was done, causing great deal of confusion and pain. > > We should also address the following: > # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are not ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? > # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How do we reconcile them? > > > On 1/14/11 11:53 AM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" wrote: > > This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release > engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for this > change. Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools using > the Apache svn URLs. So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this since, > as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create > more work for the community. > > Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term > target is to release these 3 projects independently? > > Nicholas > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level > > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > >> Hi Nigel, >> >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >> >> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the >> >> problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. > > Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing these 3 > projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a > unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can weigh > in with additional thoughts. > >> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first >> >> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. > > What do you see as the huge impact? > > Nige > From general-return-2831-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:14:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45750 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:14:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 21457 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21118 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21109 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:14:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.97] (HELO asmtpout022.mac.com) (17.148.16.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:14:18 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp022.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF700196D785U30@asmtp022.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:13:56 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-18_01:2011-01-17,2011-01-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170239 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:13:55 -0800 Message-id: References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release > engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for this > change. I have a hard time believing this as I suspect the very small set of folks that test/deploy post-project split releases (0.21/0.22/trunk) have been smashing the 3 projects back together for test/deploy purposes on a cluster. You *will* have to change your personal and your build machine SVN checkout urls, but beyond that, the projects remain as-is in separate trees. When we mavenize, that will perhaps cause the disruption you're mentioning, but that is a separate issue/discussion from this one. > Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools using > the Apache svn URLs. I sign up to correct the wiki, site, and Apache Hudson builds and build scripts (although help is gratefully received). > So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this since, > as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create > more work for the community. I don't believe we have exited from the previous mess. This could actually help us do that faster. You may not have noticed that 0.21 was released as a single smashed together tar ball. 0.22 IMO is heading for the same kind of release. > Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term > target is to release these 3 projects independently? Because that long term view is currently a fantasy with no real end in sight. Nige > ________________________________ > From: Nigel Daley > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level > > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: > >> Hi Nigel, >> >>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >> >> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the >> >> problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. > > Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing these 3 > projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a > unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can weigh > in with additional thoughts. > >> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first >> >> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. > > What do you see as the huge impact? > > Nige From general-return-2832-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:14:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45841 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:14:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 22573 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22522 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22514 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:14:36 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3396764bwz.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:14:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.72.71 with SMTP id l7mr2942734bkj.55.1295327654206; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:14:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.122.5 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:14:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:14:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Good questions. =A0Keep them coming! =A0I'll compile a list so we can sta= rt an FAQ on this. > >> # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are n= ot ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result = in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? > > > Note, we're not putting them back together. =A0This is NOT a cmd-Z (ctrl-= Z) on the project split. =A0It's putting them back under one trunk, but as = separate projects underneath that. =A0IMO this is a relatively small change= in the universe of undo-the-project-split possibilities. Yes, the three projects would still build separately. However, it would be useful to have a small top-level script to produce a single artifact, like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6342 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846. > >> # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How= do we reconcile them? > > I'd like to keep that issue out of this change if at all possible. =A0I r= ecommend for now we keep the status quo. =A0Thus, even though all committer= s may technically have permission to commit to all 3 project trees (can som= eone confirm that?), we would need to rely on the honor system that committ= ers will only commit to their project trees. That's right - we don't have fine-grained commit access on the Hadoop tree, so we don't need to change anything here. Tom > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > >> I like the idea of merging projects together. It save a lot of time. >> >> However, I would like to see a detailed proposal on how this will be don= e and discussions on it, before moving forward on this. If this work is don= e, need clear messages to the developers on what has changed, and how devel= opment process is affected. These details were missing when project split w= as done, causing great deal of confusion and pain. >> >> We should also address the following: >> # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are n= ot ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result = in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? >> # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How= do we reconcile them? >> >> >> On 1/14/11 11:53 AM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" wrote: >> >> This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, relea= se >> engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for = this >> change. =A0Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing to= ols using >> the Apache svn URLs. =A0So it is a huge impact. =A0I am conservative on = this since, >> as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will = create >> more work for the community. >> >> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long te= rm >> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Nigel Daley >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> >>> Hi Nigel, >>> >>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on wh= at >>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. = =A0Many >>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a spli= tting >>>> headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of= that. >>> >>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? = =A0What the >>> >>> problems are being addressed? =A0It is not clear to me. >> >> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing t= hese 3 >> projects independently. =A0Given that, they should be branched and relea= sed as a >> unit." =A0This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's= can weigh >> in with additional thoughts. >> >>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. =A0We sh= ould first >>> >>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >> >> What do you see as the huge impact? >> >> Nige >> > > From general-return-2833-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:36:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51741 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:36:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:36:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 35561 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35304 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35296 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:36:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:36:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:36:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 49702 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:36:01 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:36:01 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6241181iyb.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:36:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.35.204 with SMTP id q12mr5346921ibd.191.1295328960230; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.167.199 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:36:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D34D59F.4010802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:36:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > We had this exact same discussion about the 0.20-append branch a few weeks > ago. A few organizations have tested that code at scale and feel strongly > that it's stable. We decided not to release it because it does not meet the > Apache guidelines for a release. It does meet the guidelines. The last validation and development of the append work wasn't done openly, but that doesn't prevent it from being contributed and released. That discussion died out because no committer stepped up, rolled a release of that branch, and called a vote. If it gets a majority of votes on the PMC, it could even be released off the 0.20 branch. Individuals may have their reservations and vote accordingly, but the PMC has the authority to release 0.20-append and 0.20.100 (or whatever). > A few weeks later, we now have another organization claiming that their > 0.20-based branch is tested at scale and should be released. It's claimed > that 0.20.100 will be "more stable, performant and more useful to our > users"; the same can be said of the 0.20-append branch. Neither branch, > however, is a bugfix release and thus does not meet the Apache guidelines > for a release. That's too bad; we should work to avoid this situation again > in the future, but let's not try to change the rules because we did a poor > job in the past of getting our work released via Apache. The rules from Apache are *far* more flexible than what we've practiced. Our rigidity has contributed to the current state of the project by pushing active development behind the walls of contributing organizations. We aren't obligated to live with a fractured community, nor do some nebulous Apache guidelines prohibit us from finding a way forward. > As Nigel mentions, and as was done with 0.20-append, I would fully support a > "a code-only drop into a branch w/ no formal Apache release". That's fully > compliant with the Apache process. This helps nobody except those who would cut releases outside of Apache, which is precisely what we're trying to curtail. > All of these discussions will be moot once we get 0.22 out the door and stop > arguing over which organization has the most magical 0.20-based bits. I'm > looking forward to seeing all of the Apache Hadoop contributors working full > time on that release process once these bits are committed to the 0.20.100 > branch. +1 I'm sure I'm not alone in turning ill at the thought of working on a 0.20 branch again. But others may have different priorities, different interests, and may actually prefer the architectural decisions in 0.20 to those made since then. There's obviously enough interest in a stable branch for all the major contributors to solve those same problems independently. Opening up space in Apache for that work is what we should have done a year ago. Since we don't yet have a credible release, it still makes sense today. -C From general-return-2834-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:41:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63361 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:41:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:41:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 39783 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:41:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39629 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:41:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39618 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:41:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:41:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:41:43 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I5euf4071969 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:40:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.244.133) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:40:55 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:40:53 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>=20 ... >> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long = term =20 >> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >=20 > Because that long term view is currently a fantasy with no real end in = sight. ** +1 to that. We release as a unit, branch as a unit, test as a unit, = deploy as a unit. I've seen no actual gain from the project split, just = complexity. Simplifying things in the short term seems like a good = goal. > Nige >=20 >=20 >> ________________________________ >> From: Nigel Daley >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>=20 >>> Hi Nigel, >>>=20 >>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on = what >>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an = adjustment. Many >>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a = splitting >>>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some = of that. >>>=20 >>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would = help? What the=20 >>>=20 >>> problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. >>=20 >> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from = releasing these 3=20 >> projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and = released as a=20 >> unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. = Other's can weigh=20 >> in with additional thoughts. >>=20 >>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We = should first=20 >>>=20 >>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >>=20 >> What do you see as the huge impact? >>=20 >> Nige >=20 From general-return-2835-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:55:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66699 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:55:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:55:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 50017 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49653 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:55:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49624 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:55:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:55:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:54:59 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5947285wye.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.58.144 with SMTP id q16mr2838104wec.74.1295330078505; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:54:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:54:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:54:18 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cAOp2fUHoilLgkPDuUNT3IMIgBs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:40, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > > On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>> > ... >>> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long t= erm >>> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >> >> Because that long term view is currently a fantasy with no real end in s= ight. > > ** +1 to that. =A0We release as a unit, branch as a unit, test as a unit,= deploy as a unit. =A0I've seen no actual gain from the project split, just= complexity. Am I missing something in the latest development of Hadoop, Eric? What do you mean by 'we... test as a unit'? Is it like we have test artifacts version'd against Hadoop release proper? Or you are trying to say something else? It isn't very clear, sorry... Cos >> Nige >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Nigel Daley >>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >>> >>> >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Nigel, >>>> >>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on w= hat >>>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment.= =A0Many >>>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a spl= itting >>>>> headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some o= f that. >>>> >>>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? = =A0What the >>>> >>>> problems are being addressed? =A0It is not clear to me. >>> >>> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing = these 3 >>> projects independently. =A0Given that, they should be branched and rele= ased as a >>> unit." =A0This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other'= s can weigh >>> in with additional thoughts. >>> >>>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. =A0We s= hould first >>>> >>>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >>> >>> What do you see as the huge impact? >>> >>> Nige >> > > From general-return-2836-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:57:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67220 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:57:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:57:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 54816 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:57:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54610 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54602 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:57:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:57:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=FRT_TODAY2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:57:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-77-c11.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.77.11]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I5uhZ5097561 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:56:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295330204; bh=JTn6irNJFvKGHncNkpxdI+nn3hETmuaa6HkXelvEFrs=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=j1j9341aqblGqfxPXsG8/sPJKfRM5kjZf+ZynYJcEM8PjL+GEoUZr7sm/4m1MoL/Z XEKNI2Oq5HwYAuy7EWR+vt2p28kCz3jeQrOAlIJQNK0DXvwKiYitXgBkG+P/B0s/iT bM2f5wiEVkfDC/Z68IzNV/7RtJGzPlnxKGKg/PLM= Message-Id: <728AC0D9-3452-46BB-9E13-405CEDF0843E@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-90--804576159 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:56:43 -0800 References: <4D34D59F.4010802@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-90--804576159 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bringing 'organizations' into this discussion is very disingenuous. Doug, credit to him, was the first person to propose this release: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@hadoop.apache.org/msg01427.html I have supported the append-release: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@hadoop.apache.org/msg02584.html So, stop coloring arguments in this manner. Arun On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > We had this exact same discussion about the 0.20-append branch a few > weeks > ago. A few organizations have tested that code at scale and feel > strongly > that it's stable. We decided not to release it because it does not > meet the > Apache guidelines for a release. The Apache process has its pros and > cons; > we've all accepted them, so the community moved on and focused its > energy on > the 0.22 release. > > A few weeks later, we now have another organization claiming that > their > 0.20-based branch is tested at scale and should be released. It's > claimed > that 0.20.100 will be "more stable, performant and more useful to our > users"; the same can be said of the 0.20-append branch. Neither > branch, > however, is a bugfix release and thus does not meet the Apache > guidelines > for a release. That's too bad; we should work to avoid this > situation again > in the future, but let's not try to change the rules because we did > a poor > job in the past of getting our work released via Apache. > > As Nigel mentions, and as was done with 0.20-append, I would fully > support a > "a code-only drop into a branch w/ no formal Apache release". That's > fully > compliant with the Apache process. > > All of these discussions will be moot once we get 0.22 out the door > and stop > arguing over which organization has the most magical 0.20-based > bits. I'm > looking forward to seeing all of the Apache Hadoop contributors > working full > time on that release process once these bits are committed to the > 0.20.100 > branch. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Todd Papaioannou inc.com>wrote: > >> That's only true if you plan to pull forward the changes wholesale >> into >> .21, .22 and beyond. And that is not what is being proposed. >> >> If the plan is to just land an updated and more stable version of . >> 20 that >> is completely backwards compatible, then this can be done within >> that code >> line without any impact to the end users. Any changes that the >> community >> wish to pull forward can be identified, isolated and reviewed per >> the normal >> process. Or they can remain in the .20.100 release for eternity, >> without any >> impact on the future. >> >> Either way, the .20 release will be more stable, performant and >> more useful >> to our users, and the community at large can focus on releasing . >> 22, which >> we all believe is the right goal. >> >> ToddP >> >> From: Doug Cutting > >> Reply-To: >> "general@hadoop.apache.org" < >> general@hadoop.apache.org> >> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:49:51 -0800 >> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" < >> general@hadoop.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset >> >> >> Backwards compatibility has been a goal, so >> with luck we will not ID regressions. >> >> My point was that, in addition to back-compatibility with prior 0.20 >> releases, we must also consider the forward-compatibility of each >> change >> with 0.21, 0.22 and trunk. >> --Apple-Mail-90--804576159-- From general-return-2837-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 05:58:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67494 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 05:58:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 05:58:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 56276 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:58:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56185 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 05:58:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56176 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 05:58:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:58:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:58:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-77-c11.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.77.11]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I5uhZ6097561 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:57:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295330251; bh=i+dlT5Nx/yYBhn/Lsr/9tEzKq5TakdgxXVjxQK/z1Z8=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=Xy6LN/v9TLafpQgxB+laBMfftDo9LZsgiTw1lq713x/j0TW8v/BFUxHZS+PzQezzc ybViFCdkJ2+zsMWbsGFWvEyO/rMm8F+oiDXdLsuwg/hWdEe6FfnwBACPM3uTaIFONi EF0zKvMX6HjKsKFT9tHVvXFP0GrutSVMPshEAlss= Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:57:30 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <6250B06D-2502-47E6-950D-3015485C516B@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:40 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> Apache Hadoop hasn't had a stable, updated release in a while. >> > > That's what 0.22 is for? Every single Hadoop release in the recent past, and I have worked on pretty much every single Hadoop release since forever, has taken at least 3-4 months to stabilize. So, we are, at a minimum looking at June, 2011, for 0.22. This could be a good intermediate release, no? This need not be the only one either, please work on 20.append or 20.append+security and release it, I fully support it. IAC, would calling this release something other than 0.20.* be ok? Arun From general-return-2838-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 06:17:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79943 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 06:17:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 06:17:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 66929 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66589 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:17:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66580 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 06:17:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:17:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.105 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.105] (HELO asmtpout030.mac.com) (17.148.16.105) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:17:09 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_mEOyl55Y6cSlYPic3Psxzw)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] (c-71-198-192-174.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.192.174]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LF700EAKG3MOO90@asmtp030.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:16:35 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-18_01:2011-01-17,2011-01-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1101170258 From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:16:34 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_mEOyl55Y6cSlYPic3Psxzw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Wiki FAQ started here: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSplit Todd, left a note there for you to add in a link to a git-history-fixer-script Jira when the time comes. If folks find more docs that will need updating, please add them to the list at the end of the FAQ. We still need to fill in the exact steps that developers will need to perform to change their workspaces once this change is made. Nige On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Good questions. Keep them coming! I'll compile a list so we can start an FAQ on this. > >> # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are not ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? > > > Note, we're not putting them back together. This is NOT a cmd-Z (ctrl-Z) on the project split. It's putting them back under one trunk, but as separate projects underneath that. IMO this is a relatively small change in the universe of undo-the-project-split possibilities. > >> # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How do we reconcile them? > > I'd like to keep that issue out of this change if at all possible. I recommend for now we keep the status quo. Thus, even though all committers may technically have permission to commit to all 3 project trees (can someone confirm that?), we would need to rely on the honor system that committers will only commit to their project trees. > > Cheers, > Nige > > On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > >> I like the idea of merging projects together. It save a lot of time. >> >> However, I would like to see a detailed proposal on how this will be done and discussions on it, before moving forward on this. If this work is done, need clear messages to the developers on what has changed, and how development process is affected. These details were missing when project split was done, causing great deal of confusion and pain. >> >> We should also address the following: >> # Is project split a goal for hadoop in the future (even though we are not ready yet?). If it is, then putting projects back together might result in tight dependencies between the project. Ho do we avoid it? >> # The committer list for each of the sub project today is different. How do we reconcile them? >> >> >> On 1/14/11 11:53 AM, "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" wrote: >> >> This is a kind of an incompatible change: all the developers, QAs, release >> engineers and users have to change their local settings and scripts for this >> change. Moreover, there are documentations, web pages and existing tools using >> the Apache svn URLs. So it is a huge impact. I am conservative on this since, >> as Konstantin mentioned, we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create >> more work for the community. >> >> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long term >> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Nigel Daley >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >> >>> Hi Nigel, >>> >>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on what >>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustment. Many >>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a splitting >>>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some of that. >>> >>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help? What the >>> >>> problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. >> >> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasing these 3 >> projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and released as a >> unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Other's can weigh >> in with additional thoughts. >> >>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We should first >>> >>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >> >> What do you see as the huge impact? >> >> Nige >> > --Boundary_(ID_mEOyl55Y6cSlYPic3Psxzw)-- From general-return-2839-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 06:34:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90924 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 06:34:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 06:34:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 81012 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79384 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78535 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 06:34:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:34:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:34:11 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I6XbIv008255 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.244.133) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:33:36 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:33:34 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <8AA8E042-F3FA-4382-B8AF-1FE272F8A880@yahoo-inc.com> References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nigel proposes that in this release (as in previous releases), = everything should be packaged together. Our in house experience at yahoo is that this makes a lot of sense. It = is how we find it most effective to operate. The project split has = introduced a lot of complexity with no return. Do you see any advantage to the status quo, versus nigel's proposal? Thanks! And sorry for any ambiguity. E14 On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:40, Eric Baldeschwieler = wrote: >>=20 >> On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>=20 >> ... >>>> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the = long term >>>> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >>>=20 >>> Because that long term view is currently a fantasy with no real end = in sight. >>=20 >> ** +1 to that. We release as a unit, branch as a unit, test as a = unit, deploy as a unit. I've seen no actual gain from the project = split, just complexity. >=20 > Am I missing something in the latest development of Hadoop, Eric? What > do you mean by 'we... test as a unit'? Is it like we have test > artifacts version'd against Hadoop release proper? Or you are trying > to say something else? It isn't very clear, sorry... >=20 > Cos >=20 >=20 >>> Nige >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Nigel Daley >>>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Nigel, >>>>>=20 >>>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split = on what >>>>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an = adjustment. Many >>>>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a = splitting >>>>>> headache. I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some = of that. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would = help? What the >>>>>=20 >>>>> problems are being addressed? It is not clear to me. >>>>=20 >>>> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from = releasing these 3 >>>> projects independently. Given that, they should be branched and = released as a >>>> unit." This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. = Other's can weigh >>>> in with additional thoughts. >>>>=20 >>>>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. We = should first >>>>>=20 >>>>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >>>>=20 >>>> What do you see as the huge impact? >>>>=20 >>>> Nige >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 From general-return-2840-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 06:53:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94217 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 06:53:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 06:53:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 96787 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:53:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96460 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 06:52:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96452 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 06:52:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:52:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=LONG_TERM_PRICE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:52:50 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5978840wye.35 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:52:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.143.17 with SMTP id k17mr703509wej.74.1295333549750; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:52:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:52:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8AA8E042-F3FA-4382-B8AF-1FE272F8A880@yahoo-inc.com> References: <439416.18126.qm@web56207.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <15CB20F8-469A-457D-BFE2-084785FB9E18@mac.com> <113546.32737.qm@web56204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <8AA8E042-F3FA-4382-B8AF-1FE272F8A880@yahoo-inc.com> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:52:08 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PbAtM50WLuEXxYQwR21xrfmbMCY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Packaging everything together makes sense for unit/functional level of tests. Since Hadoop in current shape doesn't have any other kinds of tests (despite of limited system tests implemented within Herriot framework) there's no objections per se. And you know my take on Hadoop's stack testing for it proved to be beneficial for Y! security release stabilization in particular: stack testing has to be done by a set of separate component specific testing artifacts tailored together for the particular stack's validation. But since we aren't anywhere near the noble goal (as correctly mentioned by Nigel et all) we don't need to make any changes in out "bits + functional tests" packaging schema. Thanks for clarification of your point, btw. Cos On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 22:33, Eric Baldeschwieler w= rote: > Nigel proposes that in this release (as in previous releases), everything= should be packaged together. > > Our in house experience at yahoo is that this makes a lot of sense. =A0It= is how we find it most effective to operate. =A0The project split has intr= oduced a lot of complexity with no return. > > Do you see any advantage to the status quo, versus nigel's proposal? > > Thanks! =A0And sorry for any ambiguity. > > E14 > > > > On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:40, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>> >>> ... >>>>> Why do we want to enforce the releases as a unit, given that the long= term >>>>> target is to release these 3 projects independently? >>>> >>>> Because that long term view is currently a fantasy with no real end in= sight. >>> >>> ** +1 to that. =A0We release as a unit, branch as a unit, test as a uni= t, deploy as a unit. =A0I've seen no actual gain from the project split, ju= st complexity. >> >> Am I missing something in the latest development of Hadoop, Eric? What >> do you mean by 'we... test as a unit'? Is it like we have test >> artifacts version'd against Hadoop release proper? Or you are trying >> to say something else? It isn't very clear, sorry... >> >> Cos >> >> >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Nigel Daley >>>>> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >>>>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 11:21:25 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Nigel, >>>>>> >>>>>>> As I look more at the impact of the common/MR/HDFS project split on= what >>>>>>> and how we release Hadoop, I feel like the split needs an adjustmen= t. =A0Many >>>>>>> folks I've talked to agree that the project split has caused us a s= plitting >>>>>>> headache. =A0I think 1 relatively small change could alleviate some= of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you elaborate your idea on how the proposed changes would help= ? =A0What the >>>>>> >>>>>> problems are being addressed? =A0It is not clear to me. >>>>> >>>>> Critical in my mind was my statement: "We're a long way from releasin= g these 3 >>>>> projects independently. =A0Given that, they should be branched and re= leased as a >>>>> unit." =A0This can not be enforced given the current svn layout. Othe= r's can weigh >>>>> in with additional thoughts. >>>>> >>>>>> You are right that the change is small but the impact is huge. =A0We= should first >>>>>> >>>>>> understand what we are getting from the changes before doing it. >>>>> >>>>> What do you see as the huge impact? >>>>> >>>>> Nige >>>> >>> >>> > > From general-return-2841-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 08:02:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21762 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:02:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:02:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 84240 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83860 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83842 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 08:02:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [159.226.40.9] (HELO software.ict.ac.cn) (159.226.40.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:02:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 15261 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:01:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xieys) (10.61.0.2) by software.ict.ac.cn with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:01:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:00:41 +0800 From: "xieyeshan" To: "general" Subject: How to use combiner in hadoop streaming Message-ID: <201101181600405786301@software.ict.ac.cn> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 23 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon117660732750_=====" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=====003_Dragon117660732750_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi,all I want to use combiner in hadoop streaming, but combiner is not the same as mapper or reducer in streaming.How could I do this? Thanks! Yours, Yeshan Xie 2011-01-18 xieyeshan --=====003_Dragon117660732750_=====-- From general-return-2842-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 08:07:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31990 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:07:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 91828 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91635 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91624 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 08:07:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:07:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:07:09 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so7280600fxm.35 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:06:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VX71sXvG6cvepYdmlvD65LR84NfAs50nLEA9M1Tsa3c=; b=Yz5ZZly7f8RlJVyrE6KLwbVCTogkEVq9rXXIcNVr0E3Bn5gxljh32EipsiwvrUEPAh yEfUYyZaDCuq6Bi2nHrqEmW941c8JvNtXPmPG75PQyQ+Wn++JIdxiDGwY9z/wafrwahP N95aqJMiL2HKzz/q76neGnliOMHTFErucVpVs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E6QWYIDD9mGmEGDig5AugahqcgajX0sgmTeFqTcyG09c1qrJa3RfDo9BF7FrwpUXoJ if1ZlTh3Qy2NUNQhFwdwglKv3kKY2Icf3OCQTnGDTYORCxKWSIlq6Bwz0Gb2MQLTSH0D TaEDiiXR4JNY9eZbmIw7TNmb6seIsayqzhxCo= Received: by 10.223.85.203 with SMTP id p11mr5806741fal.108.1295338007561; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:06:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.200 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:06:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201101181600405786301@software.ict.ac.cn> References: <201101181600405786301@software.ict.ac.cn> From: Harsh J Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:36:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to use combiner in hadoop streaming To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Right now, the Combiner has to be a Java Class. A command is unacceptable, as noted here: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopStreaming On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM, xieyeshan w= rote: > hi,all > > =A0 =A0 I want to use combiner in hadoop streaming, but combiner is not t= he same as mapper or reducer in streaming.How could I do this? > =A0 =A0 Thanks! > > > Yours, > > Yeshan Xie > > 2011-01-18 > > > > xieyeshan > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2843-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 08:15:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34741 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:15:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 998 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:15:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 647 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:14:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 637 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 08:14:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:14:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [159.226.40.9] (HELO software.ict.ac.cn) (159.226.40.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:14:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 16420 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:13:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xieys) (10.61.0.2) by software.ict.ac.cn with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:13:59 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:13:13 +0800 From: "=?utf-8?B?eGlleWVzaGFu?=" To: "=?utf-8?B?Z2VuZXJhbA==?=" References: <201101181600405786301@software.ict.ac.cn> Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IFJlOiBIb3cgdG8gdXNlIGNvbWJpbmVyIGluIGhhZG9vcCBzdHJlYW1pbmc=?= Message-ID: <201101181613130466899@software.ict.ac.cn> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 23 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon887860437502_=====" --=====003_Dragon887860437502_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksSGFyc2ggSiANCg0KICAgIEkgdXNlIGEgSmF2YSBDbGFzcyBhcyBjb21iaW5lciBhbmQgZ2V0 IGZvbGxvd2luZyBlcnJvciBpbmZvbWF0aW9uOg0KRXhjZXB0aW9uIGluIHRocmVhZCAibWFpbiIg amF2YS5sYW5nLk5vQ2xhc3NEZWZGb3VuZEVycm9yOiBvcmcvYXBhY2hlL2hhZG9vcC9zdHJlYW1p bmcvUGxzYUNvbWJpbmUgKHdyb25nIG5hbWU6IFBsc2FDb21iaW5lKQ0KICAgICAgICBhdCBqYXZh LmxhbmcuQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIuZGVmaW5lQ2xhc3MxKE5hdGl2ZSBNZXRob2QpDQogICAgICAgIGF0 IGphdmEubGFuZy5DbGFzc0xvYWRlci5kZWZpbmVDbGFzcyhDbGFzc0xvYWRlci5qYXZhOjYyMCkN CiAgICAgICAgYXQgamF2YS5zZWN1cml0eS5TZWN1cmVDbGFzc0xvYWRlci5kZWZpbmVDbGFzcyhT ZWN1cmVDbGFzc0xvYWRlci5qYXZhOjEyNCkNCiAgICAgICAgYXQgamF2YS5uZXQuVVJMQ2xhc3NM b2FkZXIuZGVmaW5lQ2xhc3MoVVJMQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIuamF2YToyNjApDQogICAgICAgIGF0IGph dmEubmV0LlVSTENsYXNzTG9hZGVyLmFjY2VzcyQwMDAoVVJMQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIuamF2YTo1NikN CiAgICAgICAgYXQgamF2YS5uZXQuVVJMQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIkMS5ydW4oVVJMQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIu amF2YToxOTUpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IGphdmEuc2VjdXJpdHkuQWNjZXNzQ29udHJvbGxlci5kb1By aXZpbGVnZWQoTmF0aXZlIE1ldGhvZCkNCiAgICAgICAgYXQgamF2YS5uZXQuVVJMQ2xhc3NMb2Fk ZXIuZmluZENsYXNzKFVSTENsYXNzTG9hZGVyLmphdmE6MTg4KQ0KICAgICAgICBhdCBqYXZhLmxh bmcuQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIubG9hZENsYXNzKENsYXNzTG9hZGVyLmphdmE6MzA2KQ0KICAgICAgICBh dCBqYXZhLmxhbmcuQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIubG9hZENsYXNzKENsYXNzTG9hZGVyLmphdmE6MjUxKQ0K ICAgICAgICBhdCBqYXZhLmxhbmcuQ2xhc3NMb2FkZXIubG9hZENsYXNzSW50ZXJuYWwoQ2xhc3NM b2FkZXIuamF2YTozMTkpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IGphdmEubGFuZy5DbGFzcy5mb3JOYW1lMChOYXRp dmUgTWV0aG9kKQ0KICAgICAgICBhdCBqYXZhLmxhbmcuQ2xhc3MuZm9yTmFtZShDbGFzcy5qYXZh OjI0NykNCiAgICAgICAgYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AuY29uZi5Db25maWd1cmF0aW9uLmdl dENsYXNzQnlOYW1lKENvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24uamF2YTo3NjEpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IG9yZy5hcGFj aGUuaGFkb29wLnN0cmVhbWluZy5TdHJlYW1VdGlsLmdvb2RDbGFzc09yTnVsbChTdHJlYW1VdGls LmphdmE6NTYpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLnN0cmVhbWluZy5TdHJlYW1K b2Iuc2V0Sm9iQ29uZihTdHJlYW1Kb2IuamF2YTo3MDkpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUu aGFkb29wLnN0cmVhbWluZy5TdHJlYW1Kb2IucnVuKFN0cmVhbUpvYi5qYXZhOjExNykNCiAgICAg ICAgYXQgb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5oYWRvb3AudXRpbC5Ub29sUnVubmVyLnJ1bihUb29sUnVubmVyLmph dmE6NjUpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29wLnV0aWwuVG9vbFJ1bm5lci5ydW4o VG9vbFJ1bm5lci5qYXZhOjc5KQ0KICAgICAgICBhdCBvcmcuYXBhY2hlLmhhZG9vcC5zdHJlYW1p bmcuSGFkb29wU3RyZWFtaW5nLm1haW4oSGFkb29wU3RyZWFtaW5nLmphdmE6MzIpDQogICAgICAg IGF0IHN1bi5yZWZsZWN0Lk5hdGl2ZU1ldGhvZEFjY2Vzc29ySW1wbC5pbnZva2UwKE5hdGl2ZSBN ZXRob2QpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IHN1bi5yZWZsZWN0Lk5hdGl2ZU1ldGhvZEFjY2Vzc29ySW1wbC5p bnZva2UoTmF0aXZlTWV0aG9kQWNjZXNzb3JJbXBsLmphdmE6MzkpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IHN1bi5y ZWZsZWN0LkRlbGVnYXRpbmdNZXRob2RBY2Nlc3NvckltcGwuaW52b2tlKERlbGVnYXRpbmdNZXRo b2RBY2Nlc3NvckltcGwuamF2YToyNSkNCiAgICAgICAgYXQgamF2YS5sYW5nLnJlZmxlY3QuTWV0 aG9kLmludm9rZShNZXRob2QuamF2YTo1OTcpDQogICAgICAgIGF0IG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuaGFkb29w LnV0aWwuUnVuSmFyLm1haW4oUnVuSmFyLmphdmE6MTU2KQ0KICAgICAgDQoNCg0KVGhhbmtzIQ0K DQoNCjIwMTEtMDEtMTggDQoNCg0KDQp4aWV5ZXNoYW4gDQoNCg0KDQrlj5Hku7bkurrvvJogSGFy c2ggSiANCuWPkemAgeaXtumXtO+8miAyMDExLTAxLTE4ICAxNjowNzowNSANCuaUtuS7tuS6uu+8 miBnZW5lcmFsIA0K5oqE6YCB77yaIA0K5Li76aKY77yaIFJlOiBIb3cgdG8gdXNlIGNvbWJpbmVy IGluIGhhZG9vcCBzdHJlYW1pbmcgDQogDQpSaWdodCBub3csIHRoZSBDb21iaW5lciBoYXMgdG8g YmUgYSBKYXZhIENsYXNzLiBBIGNvbW1hbmQgaXMNCnVuYWNjZXB0YWJsZSwgYXMgbm90ZWQgaGVy ZToNCmh0dHA6Ly93aWtpLmFwYWNoZS5vcmcvaGFkb29wL0hhZG9vcFN0cmVhbWluZw0KT24gVHVl LCBKYW4gMTgsIDIwMTEgYXQgMTozMCBQTSwgeGlleWVzaGFuIDx4aWV5ZXNoYW5Ac29mdHdhcmUu aWN0LmFjLmNuPiB3cm90ZToNCj4gaGksYWxsDQo+DQo+ICAgICBJIHdhbnQgdG8gdXNlIGNvbWJp bmVyIGluIGhhZG9vcCBzdHJlYW1pbmcsIGJ1dCBjb21iaW5lciBpcyBub3QgdGhlIHNhbWUgYXMg bWFwcGVyIG9yIHJlZHVjZXIgaW4gc3RyZWFtaW5nLkhvdyBjb3VsZCBJIGRvIHRoaXM/DQo+ICAg ICBUaGFua3MhDQo+DQo+DQo+IFlvdXJzLA0KPg0KPiBZZXNoYW4gWGllDQo+DQo+IDIwMTEtMDEt MTgNCj4NCj4NCj4NCj4geGlleWVzaGFuDQo+DQotLSANCkhhcnNoIEoNCnd3dy5oYXJzaGouY29t DQo= --=====003_Dragon887860437502_=====-- From general-return-2844-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 08:21:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37154 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 08:21:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 08:21:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8211 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7872 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 08:21:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7860 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 08:21:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:21:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.97.132.145] (HELO homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:21:00 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8751B4059 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:20:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= gbiv.com; b=rKVQ4o0LuvBi8VGHEdPrgY+IxoPw7tgTJRAg2e9EOT/P4k5s6shs jFQ8Dt6MDk4ZPsOfnRfGLdKiECbGs+NX0Y6zPr3Y9nxYe3YbGMKjsI/PViBZR+fk 0MHX4rhBMSYfMLdeT0tDY8kLddSDhjPwRedr36rB6t5DFES8eS5qWP8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=8/W+nrwShLrbD791RGWTcYZeVpA=; b=FcRQSAFPMyi8uaIr0W4/W4qJ8KVp 7u5JQkyXNkDMBgHvG/wB0+Sx+ESlxv/u+iG84SMJcKgufyQUzlu/m8XLELY1MCUS 2EUknklapXuC/6wWUq7Da0sLg8P6QYzgV63kOWwjfq8R2PlA54g7jpL6SX5UHNCx mPYkryeLq+/Nh24= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3B60D1B4058 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:20:39 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:20:38 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) I thought that this discussion would have reached some sensible understanding of how Apache projects work by now, but it seems not. On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of = them, *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance = fixes we have done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. This is = a battle tested and hardened version which we have deployed on 40,000+ = nodes. It is a significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which we never = deployed. I'm pretty sure *some* users will find that valuable. ;) >=20 > Also, I've offered to push individual patches as a background activity = on a branch - that should suffice, no? Or, do you consider this a = blocker? >=20 > Again, my goal in this exercise is to get a stable, improved version = of Hadoop into the hands of our users asap, and focus on 0.22 and = beyond. So, you have a bunch of changes that you want to contribute. Please do so. There are several ways: a) break the changes down into a sequence of patches, create jira issues for each one (or append to the existing issue), and then provide the group with a list of the issue links so that people can quickly +1 each one. When it seems worthwhile to you, create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and commit each patch to it until the branch is identical to (or, in your own opinion, better than) the source code that you have tested locally. Then RM a tarball and start a release vote. Since all of this is being done in jira and svn, others can help you do all but the first part (breaking down the big patch). or b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if you don't have time. or c) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and apply one big ugly patch to it. Then RM a tarball based on that branch and ask for a release vote. You will note that none of the above requires a discussion on this list prior to the release vote, though (a) would likely result in more +1s than (b), and (b) would likely receive more +1s than (c). Regardless, the release vote is a lazy majority decision. I do not believe that there is any rational reason to apply a single big patch. "It takes too long" is nonsense -- you have already spent far more time discussing it than would be required to do it. "It is too hard" is also nonsense -- use your version control system to extract the set of changes and just replay them (with appropriate changelog editing). "It has already been tested at Y!" is simply irrelevant -- the source code has been tested, not the order in which the patches have been applied, so all you should care about is that the final branch code is comparable to the tested source code (i.e., use diff). Nevertheless, all contributions at Apache are voluntary. Do what you have time for, now, with the understanding that others may or may not complete the task, and may or may not vote for the release. You can make a branch, apply the big patch, and stand by while the rest of the group chooses whether to just accept it as a big change. Someone else might create a parallel branch to apply the specific changes in an orderly matter, or perhaps you'll discover an easy way to do that a few days from now. Or it might just sit there and never be released. There is no need for the group to agree to a plan up front, just as there is no need for the group to approve a release just because someone did the work of RMing a tarball. Sure, it might save a lot of time if potential disagreements can be resolved before work is done, but the fact is that people tend to disagree less with actual work products than with abstract plans. After all, everyone has a plan. It is also far easier to convince people to fix their own problems if the problem is right in front of them. When the release vote happens, encourage folks to test and +1 the release. If it passes, woohoo! If not, then listen to the reasons given by the other PMC members and see if you can make enough changes to the release to get those extra +1s. In other words, collaborate. ....Roy= From general-return-2845-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 10:00:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90988 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 10:00:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 10:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15418 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 10:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12527 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 10:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12517 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 10:00:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:00:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c16.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.16]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0I9xSHw060344 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:59:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295344769; bh=eXe5KYRDLrPfYtZ/wUQx7Hf9vKmDt4RTeLsFQyYdpeQ=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=k4pHMe4Aoj0AREQa5fRDYcd5u31Ls+zH4ZV0iAHo6q0HFT5kMMvXMj3ECpLWjNe7D f1PObKcTGRLPIaOj8wMtHdSc19PkogvcUi3pQ+0NHp7uXAcgKPppEn7/5GZVbCDk8m 244/FKr/FfJUb0xlxsPjGJXsRS88NeLpms8uCNtI= Message-Id: <70369193-35EB-4ECD-AB40-99F8F9424C4D@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-91--790011745 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:59:27 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-91--790011745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the clarifications Roy. I considered either b) and c). As I mentioned, the reason I think b) wasn't useful in this context is that we have, in several cases, 5-6 patches per jira (bug-fix on on top of a bug-fix) and several jiras didn't make sense for trunk since the bug didn't exist in trunk etc. etc. Also, I was considering a scenario where I would squash relevant patches together to produce a minimal set of coherent patches. Then there is work to remove Yahoo! specific commits. IAC, I agree - we've spent too much time talking and too little doing actual work. Let me get the job done and folks can then weigh-in on the release at later point, folks might be willing to consider this more positively once they see the branch, the change-log etc. Of course we need to get the small number of remaining patches into trunk asap for 0.22 and beyond. Arun On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:20 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I thought that this discussion would have reached some sensible > understanding of how Apache projects work by now, but it seems not. > > On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >> The version I'm offering to push to the community has fixed all of >> them, *plus* the added benefit of several stability and performance >> fixes we have done since 20.104.3, almost 10 internal releases. >> This is a battle tested and hardened version which we have deployed >> on 40,000+ nodes. It is a significant upgrade on 0.20.104.3 which >> we never deployed. I'm pretty sure *some* users will find that >> valuable. ;) >> >> Also, I've offered to push individual patches as a background >> activity on a branch - that should suffice, no? Or, do you consider >> this a blocker? >> >> Again, my goal in this exercise is to get a stable, improved >> version of Hadoop into the hands of our users asap, and focus on >> 0.22 and beyond. > > So, you have a bunch of changes that you want to contribute. > Please do so. There are several ways: > > a) break the changes down into a sequence of patches, create jira > issues for each one (or append to the existing issue), and then > provide the group with a list of the issue links so that people > can quickly +1 each one. When it seems worthwhile to you, create > a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and commit > each patch to it until the branch is identical to (or, in your own > opinion, better than) the source code that you have tested locally. > Then RM a tarball and start a release vote. Since all of this is > being done in jira and svn, others can help you do all but the > first part (breaking down the big patch). > > or > > b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn > and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch > source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then > RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. > Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if > you don't have time. > > or > > c) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn > and apply one big ugly patch to it. Then RM a tarball based > on that branch and ask for a release vote. > > You will note that none of the above requires a discussion on this > list prior to the release vote, though (a) would likely result in > more +1s than (b), and (b) would likely receive more +1s than (c). > Regardless, the release vote is a lazy majority decision. > > I do not believe that there is any rational reason to apply a > single big patch. "It takes too long" is nonsense -- you have > already spent far more time discussing it than would be required > to do it. "It is too hard" is also nonsense -- use your version > control system to extract the set of changes and just replay them > (with appropriate changelog editing). "It has already been tested > at Y!" is simply irrelevant -- the source code has been tested, not > the order in which the patches have been applied, so all you should > care about is that the final branch code is comparable to the tested > source code (i.e., use diff). > > Nevertheless, all contributions at Apache are voluntary. Do what > you have time for, now, with the understanding that others may or > may not complete the task, and may or may not vote for the release. > > You can make a branch, apply the big patch, and stand by > while the rest of the group chooses whether to just accept it > as a big change. Someone else might create a parallel branch to > apply the specific changes in an orderly matter, or perhaps you'll > discover an easy way to do that a few days from now. Or it > might just sit there and never be released. > > There is no need for the group to agree to a plan up front, just > as there is no need for the group to approve a release just because > someone did the work of RMing a tarball. Sure, it might save > a lot of time if potential disagreements can be resolved before > work is done, but the fact is that people tend to disagree less > with actual work products than with abstract plans. After all, > everyone has a plan. It is also far easier to convince people > to fix their own problems if the problem is right in front of them. > > When the release vote happens, encourage folks to test and +1 > the release. If it passes, woohoo! If not, then listen to the > reasons given by the other PMC members and see if you can make > enough changes to the release to get those extra +1s. > > In other words, collaborate. > > ....Roy --Apple-Mail-91--790011745-- From general-return-2846-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 18:51:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81340 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 18:51:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 18:51:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 81209 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 18:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80949 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 18:51:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80940 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 18:51:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:51:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SINGLE_HEADER_2K X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (athena.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of sseverance@ebay.com) Received: from [216.113.175.153] (HELO den-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com) (216.113.175.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:51:00 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=corp; d=ebay.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-EBay-Corp:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Date: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Message-ID:References: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:acceptlanguage: x-ems-proccessed:x-ems-stamp:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-CFilter; b=ECe2Ll2b6RvSPr0Ca3pGDtX5xLTL1tinMicgKaX8cHz/9AjHBPY6uasD ZeMjbHyNWu/ayfsAvCTTzttRrPzVvZcXcpf6LRIzlODQLe7qQBDZ06HHj aPoV8efSSmzUf+c; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ebay.com; i=sseverance@ebay.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1295376661; x=1326912661; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; z=From:=20"Severance,=20Steve"=20|To: =20"general@hadoop.apache.org"=20|Date:=20Tue,=2018=20Jan=202011=2011:53:32=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[DISCUSS]=20Hadoop=20Security=20Release =20off=20Yahoo!=20patchset|Message-ID:=20<1BCDF92034F1644 5AF61BDCCF4520A4EA4D7456A78@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com> |References:=20<516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yaho o-inc.com>=0D=0A=20<366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@ apache.org>=0D=0A=20<18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746 @yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<2A07F1E6-7096 -493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20<5CDDF962- 5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com>=0D=0A=20<075308A1-12 9B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D =0A=20<388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com >=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EF BDE544@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<74BDFA74 -DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20 =0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@!=20 =20mac.com>=0D=0A=20<00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B @yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20<58FF3525-B734-44 A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A =20<7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> =0D=0A=20<10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NE T>=0D=0A=20<4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-in c.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24 E0@yahoo-inc.com>|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-pri ntable|MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=v/AuRw2+nDq7X/21Lr/bWi7r3AhU7cubzF2I7pjvGB8=; b=vmA7tN8Y/cGtqjensk3nD/QA43ob6q0BRH+E6Nwk6ey/JaxYbSzF80MZ L0W/lb2yenLU5zoU3FDyi7sBnS9gk4RIIqMUtaXIbO5iBLm9vIsJX5a1m BLkraspbG/MqXrB; X-EBay-Corp: Yes X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,339,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="844323" Received: from den-vtenf-001.corp.ebay.com (HELO DEN-MEXHT-003.corp.ebay.com) ([10.101.112.212]) by den-mipot-002.corp.ebay.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2011 10:50:38 -0800 Received: from DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com ([10.241.16.225]) by DEN-MEXHT-003.corp.ebay.com ([10.241.17.54]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:50:37 -0700 From: "Severance, Steve" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:53:32 -0700 Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu0GHDTGqR/wYWwQz6EtfzeWHusfQDKIF1Q Message-ID: <1BCDF92034F16445AF61BDCCF4520A4EA4D7456A78@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <36CBB8E6-05D6-4AC0-838C-14B1C2B19CBD@! mac.com> <00F14279-2802-4CC3-91AC-481AE257FD8B@yahoo-inc.com> <58FF3525-B734-44A0-A5C6-45282A23F06F@yahoo-inc.com> <7D4397E2-B618-4BD1-8E1E-08B1C598B76F@yahoo-inc.com> <10BA9684-51FF-4332-A2FD-5F648E0AAF8C@Holsman.NET> <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <4E3C214A-16C6-46FF-908B-8EFB075A24E0@yahoo-inc.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US x-ems-proccessed: 10SqDH0iR7ekR7SRpKqm5A== x-ems-stamp: K8q6O4WUDDN5JJklXUq/vQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter: Scanned I want to thank Yahoo! for this release. At eBay we are very excited about = the opportunity to test a build of Hadoop that has already been extensively= field tested on large clusters. At eBay we are primarily concerned with cl= uster availability and throughput so having a build like this available to = the community is a huge win. Hats off to Arun, Eric and everyone at Yahoo! for releasing this. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Eric Baldeschwieler [mailto:eric14@yahoo-inc.com]=20 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:25 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Hi Ian, Thanks for holding off on that last .5. I've been working in a big email gi= ving move context on this. Let me preview some issues.=20 Our goal with this branch is two fold: 1) get the code out in a branch quic= kly so we an collaborate on it with the community. 2) not change the charac= ter of the code. See testing below. We're happy to compromise any other dim= ension, as long as we can do 1&2 above.=20 1) I agree this is not a good precedent. We don't support mega-patches in g= eneral. We are doing this as part of discontinuing the "yahoo distribution = of Hadoop". We don't plan to continue doing 30 person year projects outsid= e apache and then merging them in!! 2) append is hard. It is so hard we rewrote the entire write pipeline (5 pe= rson-years work) in trunk after giving up on the codeline you are suggestin= g we merge in. That work is what distinguishes all post 20 releases from 20= releases in my mind. I dont trust the 20 append code line. We've been hurt= badly by it. We did the rewrite only after losing a bunch of production d= ata a bunch of times with the previous code line. I think the various 20 a= ppend patch lines may be fine for specialized hbase clusters, but they does= n't have the rigor behind them to bet your business in them. 3) I think having a very stable recent codeline available for teams coming = into Hadoop who want to run big business apps and contribute code back is v= ery helpful. I've been talking to folks in other orgs and they've expressed= a huge amount of interest in this work, but begged us to put it into apach= e, so their oversight bodies will let them use it.=20 4) we're happy to incorporate ideas into how to best merge the work into tr= unk. Let's find the most cost effective way to preserve the most devel data= possible.=20 5) testing. Ian, I think you do us a disservice when you talk about us just= testing in our environments. If you look at the history of the project, we= 've been the force behind every stable release of apache Hadoop. And all t= he non-apache Hadoop release had been tracking this patch set. We fully sup= port the community developing independent testing capabilities. We plan to= contribute to that effort. But we are the organization with far and away = the best record for testing Hadoop.=20 We are proud of thus release, we want to share it. Help us sort out how.=20 Thanks! --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:15 AM, "Ian Holsman" wrote: > (with my Apache hat on) > I'm -0.5 on doing this as one big mega-patch and not including append (as= opposed to a series of smaller patches). >=20 > for the following reasons: >=20 > 1. It encourages bad behavior. We want discussion (and development) to ha= ppen on the lists, not in some office. By allowing these large code-dumps i= t condones this behavior, and we will likely see it again and again. Like i= t or not, this is not the apache model of open source governance.=20 >=20 > 2. There is a risk that some code that is not in a JIRA or separate patch= creeps in unwittingly. This isn't a major deal per se, but we don't really= have the proper paper trail, or the documentation on what bug it fixed etc= etc. >=20 > 3. Other groups (Facebook for example) are running with their own set of = patches. They currently have the luxury of examining each individual patch = to decide if they want to integrate it (and test it) in their environment. = We are forcing them to do the work of finding the bits they want in this hu= ge patch. >=20 > 4. By not including the append patch, we are making this release unusable= for a large portion of our community who run hbase. >=20 > 5. It makes it very hard to test. While It makes me comfortable that it h= as gone through Yahoo!'s QA and is running in their environments, it doesn'= t mean that it will work in other organizations who have different workload= mixes and software running on them. With one huge patch it makes it all or= nothing.. either they take the code-drop and perform a large QA-integratio= n effort, or they forgo the whole patch together. >=20 >=20 > **BUT** we have both the Yahoo! & Cloudera guys happy to do it, and to sp= end their time doing it.. so I think having the code-drop will put us in a = better place then where we are. >=20 >=20 > BTW, I'd like to point out a discrepancy here: >=20 > On another thread discussing hadoop-0.20-append as a separate branch, mos= t people agreed that new features shouldn't be added to 0.20, now we have a= major feature and we are all gung ho for it..=20 >=20 > --Ian >=20 > On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Stack wrote: >>=20 >>> (Man, it was looking good there for a second when 0.20.100 was about >>> security+append!) >>>=20 >>> Good luck w/ the release Arun. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >>> We might be following your 0.20.100 with a 0.20.200 append. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Super! >>=20 >> Arun >=20 From general-return-2847-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 19:10:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59451 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 19:10:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 19:10:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 26204 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 19:10:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26037 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 19:10:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26025 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 19:10:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:10:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:09:57 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=G9mdLWjBL0oRZGVXN6hjotGckByR1p4TVulNcRc2A0EpEuqt1+IYZk6o wQqgthqKCVhLDqAzjTUJSRFzR2Vvcyfdg1Mtd0ObTmPSeYjha2SAuX/p8 gZ0MAKxGNPlrvj5; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1295377794; x=1326913794; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20Hadoop=20Security=20Release =20off=20Yahoo!=20patchset|Date:=20Tue,=2018=20Jan=202011 =2019:10:26=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<3995AF5C-AA18-475B-938 4-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com>|To:=20"general@hadoop.apache .org"=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20<516684F5-0052-4381-805D-7 60B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20<366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9A E1-229959ED4065@apache.org>=0D=0A=20<18C5C999-4680-4684-B C55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com>=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A =20=0D =0A=20<2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com >=0D=0A=20<5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> =0D=0A=20<075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc. com>=0D=0A=20<4D34A270.1060102@apache.org>=20<3FEB7C1D-AE 89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=6XsB/DnyOvArQOzM0OB0VBHe9dcSOeEI7SdGYySPxAI=; b=JsNgsCa2ghWmbz6cCFPbwba0x1dOhSoeHC7Ti1kd3zYZs7HYcRRgpYIS 06SE60vITSDIoC2BD0phyfFQpiLTqeJSAnA2xEGc4ChvbcuDgPc/jnDTU dJfyG0VTWZAWyQB; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,340,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="19859802" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:10:27 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: AQHLQyNHDr2kMsQuFU+y4yuN2iEG2pL6/9oAgNt/qySAAIijAIAAK1WAgAFS1YA= Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:10:26 +0000 Message-ID: <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 17, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >=20 > Right now you don't have the choice of an Apache release if you are look= ing for a stabilized modern version of Hadoop. =20 Can we ratchet down the hyperbole to at least a point where I don't want t= o vomit? Thanks. [For the record, some of us quite like our stable, almost-a-year Apache Ha= doop 0.20.2 w/3 patches installations, thankyouverymuch. (Those patches ar= e for portability and capacity scheduler fixes, since the one in 0.20.2 is = completely useless.)]= From general-return-2848-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 19:48:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21265 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 19:48:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 19:48:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 41751 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 19:48:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41556 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 19:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41541 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 19:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:48:37 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id p0IJlvou036945; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS04.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.33]) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.37]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:47:57 -0800 From: Koji Noguchi To: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:47:55 -0800 Subject: Re: How to use combiner in hadoop streaming Thread-Topic: How to use combiner in hadoop streaming Thread-Index: Acu25sRDc5IXtNgIQDSUPLFcOTNATwAYdUuK Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org (Bcc general@. This is for Hadoop project level announcements and discussions. http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html . Using mapreduce-user@) Yeshan,=20 Which version of hadoop are you using? Officially, combiner for non-java command was added in 0.21 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4842 but I=B9d bet some of those 0.20s have this backported. Koji On 1/18/11 12:06 AM, "Harsh J" wrote: > Right now, the Combiner has to be a Java Class. A command is > unacceptable, as noted here: > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopStreaming >=20 > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM, xieyeshan > wrote: >> hi,all >>=20 >> =A0 =A0 I want to use combiner in hadoop streaming, but combiner is not = the same >> as mapper or reducer in streaming.How could I do this? >> =A0 =A0 Thanks! >>=20 >>=20 >> Yours, >>=20 >> Yeshan Xie >>=20 >> 2011-01-18 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> xieyeshan >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com >=20 From general-return-2849-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 18 23:23:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63910 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2011 23:23:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2011 23:23:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 91271 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 23:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91204 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2011 23:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91196 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2011 23:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:23:31 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0INMIkP003143; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.23]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:22:18 -0800 From: Eric Baldeschwieler To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:22:09 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu3ZowKMHpUa0PRR0iyyCLzstAu8A== Message-ID: <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds like you are agreeing with me in your own way Allen ;-) We're getting > 2x better throughput and stability from the capacity schedu= ler in this branch. I'd love to get you feedback on that. The more nodes and users in your deployment, the more improvements you will= see.=20 --- E14 - via iPhone On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:10 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" = wrote: > On Jan 17, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>=20 >> Right now you don't have the choice of an Apache release if you are look= ing for a stabilized modern version of Hadoop. =20 >=20 >=20 > Can we ratchet down the hyperbole to at least a point where I don't wa= nt to vomit? Thanks. >=20 > [For the record, some of us quite like our stable, almost-a-year Apach= e Hadoop 0.20.2 w/3 patches installations, thankyouverymuch. (Those patche= s are for portability and capacity scheduler fixes, since the one in 0.20.2= is completely useless.)] From general-return-2850-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 19 07:49:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47473 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 07:49:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2011 07:49:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 66210 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 07:49:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66162 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 07:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66154 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2011 07:49:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:49:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:49:35 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so265430qyk.14 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:49:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=3FAzO/u316ZKVLsBDgeqfOQc2Cu+RfPEshuKC7UQdCw=; b=iEeeJGP+yiG56wqt0V3kvoVQg0xbbOh8pUbfpTfPND0jnoLdqsLnfRSyAXNOv7naY9 bJPcOtScCDBEKQgLMn22noEtPxKjJTJKb6lBOECk5ZoMgSK6gNO8Dsp+CxI5bk8opHp9 nS7BzsenfbpQAnvGCHT3OqCafKNqj7bRsxVLc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=pxIAvkadUEF+rXWe10ZaoNacNPQMWaMmUCg9ScRx/HZZH5N5Qe38fMIe1F2gDYp5VY //YtdgEi00OUYv7o8YMhh/cfQaAihNJ3D1DKw+75lrWDybUjqfU6yKBIeGJ8XCKv+rau +Deb7CjpI9A3iegcXk909b96MMdFpjUj8rQyw= Received: by 10.229.249.17 with SMTP id mi17mr362538qcb.123.1295423354708; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.0.169] (h-64-236-128-62.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e29sm4531001qck.3.2011.01.18.23.49.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:49:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:49:05 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That's what scares me, and highlights one of the points I made before. If someone wants to just use the capacity scheduling improvements, and = not other parts, they will find it hard. I think Roy's suggestion of = applying the commits individually to the branch from your current = working branch would help with this. regards Ian On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:22 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Sounds like you are agreeing with me in your own way Allen ;-) >=20 > We're getting > 2x better throughput and stability from the capacity = scheduler in this branch. I'd love to get you feedback on that. >=20 > The more nodes and users in your deployment, the more improvements you = will see.=20 >=20 > --- > E14 - via iPhone >=20 > On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:10 AM, "Allen Wittenauer" = wrote: >=20 >> On Jan 17, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >>>=20 >>> Right now you don't have the choice of an Apache release if you are = looking for a stabilized modern version of Hadoop. =20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Can we ratchet down the hyperbole to at least a point where I don't = want to vomit? Thanks. >>=20 >> [For the record, some of us quite like our stable, almost-a-year = Apache Hadoop 0.20.2 w/3 patches installations, thankyouverymuch. = (Those patches are for portability and capacity scheduler fixes, since = the one in 0.20.2 is completely useless.)] From general-return-2851-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 19 18:08:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39849 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 18:08:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2011 18:08:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 13454 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 18:08:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13142 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 18:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13132 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2011 18:08:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:08:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.19] (HELO EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:07:53 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-4.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.19]) with mapi; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:07:33 -0800 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:09:41 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Thread-Index: Acu4A75ppI6F1MqIREK7+QBIPu9T5Q== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 1/14/11 11:24 AM, "Dhruba Borthakur" wrote: >> >> >> 1) I agree this is not a good precedent. We don't support mega-patches >>in >> general. We are doing this as part of discontinuing the "yahoo >>distribution >> of Hadoop". We don't plan to continue doing 30 person year projects >>outside >> apache and then merging them in!! >> >> >I think this is a very dangerous precedent and completely unwarranted. >mega-patches are bad and is totally not the Apache way to go. I think if >you >want to contribute it back to Apache, you should avoid the mega-patch >completely. > The mega-patch is not being applied to Trunk, or even the common 0.20.x branch, so its danger is significantly mitigated. If there is still a lot of worry about the mega-patch, there is one other compromise: * Take Cloudera's linearization of Y! Patches that go from 0.20.2 to 0.20.104.3 and commit them individually. * Then take a mini-mega patch from there to the latest Y!. That shouldn't be too hard, and meets Arun's goal of not changing the character of the code so that testing is minimized/eliminated. And it incorporates some hard work on the Cloudera side that will be useful if debugging on that branch is necessary. I want to see as much work as possible on 0.22 -- there are major improvements there that all can share and get the community more unified again. One drawback of this release is it could encourage the community to squat on 0.20 even longer... But sharing all that work can be seen as a necessary step to being able let go of 0.20 and move on as well. From general-return-2852-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 19 18:12:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40979 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 18:12:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2011 18:12:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 23281 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 18:12:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23012 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 18:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23004 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2011 18:12:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.48] (HELO mail-ew0-f48.google.com) (209.85.215.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:12:31 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so603829ewy.35 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hw+u1u/jkpcSyJcigFTBxJx2LHuVXoQuauI5LIi7tWw=; b=XPAvzdUqIBKVrxL7UGjpetjumFwp97vIvvcvIWv8jwQyYh0Q+64aHLYWdp2pAHAunn aI8hIRWLTdSTjAasPydpseUTmDptXFYUkWRGBxQ14s4PjJsi2aIBHKCrAQE91SvNbWjJ O7WnAcYiYKMlFG9VzA+JnJAYQLgcjDK6/HhjY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Dp9ymrAc+OwM2RGHgCRI2jCp+lyobNgHtoXNEan1E8eBOGOpFxBVtflrQwy1yWDo1d Mcu0gt1VxUqIOhoBtkmWbk2ykLFYli4PozI4jAlpneoFzERimbTWF5C7Jpl1OUEFE/C7 CmacBTVLAwD2sGoMN9Ik9+U7pIWNO7SWvPZLk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.127.137 with SMTP id d9mr1233949eei.2.1295460730674; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.47.140 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Konstantin Shvachko To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bb8fbac2734049a36f417 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba5bb8fbac2734049a36f417 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > I think Roy's suggestion of applying the commits individually to the branch > from your current working branch would help with this. > I am sure this is not what Roy suggested. Ian. I think the idea is simple. If you decide to donate to a non-profit organization you are free to choose the form of your donation. There is a tradeoff between its usability to the community and the effort Softwareput into making it such. The community can evaluate the quality of the donation and decide on how to consume it. Also, this is different from the 0.20-append discussion, imo, as it doesn't require additional community resources. I can see many of them are dedicated to building 0.22 as we speak. Thanks, --Konstantin --90e6ba5bb8fbac2734049a36f417-- From general-return-2853-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 19 22:01:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10844 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2011 22:01:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2011 22:01:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 36293 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 22:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35864 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2011 22:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35852 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2011 22:00:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:00:51 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so616636gwj.35 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:00:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vv+AQ8zLODFfJmULgqQ57xC6CrrC8yYNxK8Cm0l5yUM=; b=FwXuNC7/RUsl0LetwqYQ4xI4dE76zRWM1krBrirrLqKRiuQ1wTxI2CeIWnR1Tt/cyL fsWXsPYUSNRODZZm4lvNc0pa7I+QV5ShdTBw1ITRH89PPnjh++3xFHxeBCu1dhCt+/S1 AOBwdCEo9s89vOe3BmMk38OwHdfVS3+yj+rqw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=a5QMNQZlROpVbBM87Oqb38gYEFJ4zoBmxrX+w6L3b4IVvD+FD1kegKwKKVZnifj7AW CWsgxOHbR1tWwzmEWLdRcbCvXw7mK6+AkJ+/wpgCHFB6E7Pp/IB0kirvo3QV0iSeu7Vg i1BxVeds+NLz2/IRD2qgxKAt/gQc6VP8LEieQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.48.5 with SMTP id u5mr1128762web.96.1295474429825; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:00:29 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.49.11 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:00:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:00:29 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Huowu4lr_xMEnACevqc6kF85R94 Message-ID: Subject: ANN: HBase 0.90.0 available for download From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The HBase crew are pleased to announce the availability of 0.90.0. You can download it here: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/ HBase 0.90.0 is the major HBase release to follow HBase-0.20.x and the fruit of the 0.89.x development release series we've been running over the last few months. Over 1k issues have been closed since 0.20.0. Release notes are available here: http://su.pr/8LbgvK. Highlights include new master, inter-cluster replication, data durability, improved performance, improved i/o profile, etc. We recommend all upgrade to this release but ONLY after a close reading of requirements [1]. In particular, see the section on Hadoop where we talk about the Hadoop versions and HBase 0.90.0. There is no migration necessary. Your data written with HBase 0.20.x (or with HBase 0.89.x) is readable by HBase 0.90.0. A shutdown and restart after putting in place the new HBase should be all thats involved. That said, once done, there is no (easy) going back to 0.20.x once the transition has been made. HBase 0.90.0 and HBase 0.89.x write region names differently in the filesystem. Rolling restart from 0.20.x or 0.89.x to 0.90.0RC1 will not work. A big thanks goes out to all who contributed to this release. Yours, The HBasistas P.S. For why the version 0.90 and whats new in HBase 0.90, see slides 4-10 in this deck, [2]. 1. http://hbase.apache.org/notsoquick.html#requirements 2. http://hbaseblog.com/2010/07/04/hug11-hbase-0-90-preview-wrap-up/ From general-return-2854-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 02:39:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32188 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 02:39:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 02:39:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 62680 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 02:39:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62455 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 02:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62446 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 02:39:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:39:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:39:18 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so110711fxm.35 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:38:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=r9DeRFaHcSIOWH+vjT4puithEIIGZYdX0PFXD96yExI=; b=l9niiR/Hrq25kgvJxgev2JIHW0ek3bfqhVeosMO9QLZw5qW8/ckli/kSriimKfmITB SauhFO02xWXwpqiH5ucE0j/TCbb8wkfu56rhNfJCLEowxnbc1Q+zjNPT6gD9uT3JbPzm PrOB5njJnt2mEifsMVzVWtOGQ30jGWX7GRHlM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IOObcKUbk/GOY9T68H7HhcjQFX8/m6PiZijyf8SoUKTzzcjRBCA2m3gK2PbMcV7Yhr a8CIY7y596lm/2yXCpUEwpn/XYoUgDC5avoMTzmB2H5vBESv6ieXelGFQSgQhTsPkuOE nFdaDqnIHSAQF73SlEHRQU9dMDkcUWPFLwIxo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.240.6 with SMTP id s6mr980161mur.33.1295491135253; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:38:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.102.48.15 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:38:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:38:55 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: use counter to statistics file row number From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369cff89ed2c74049a3e08eb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016369cff89ed2c74049a3e08eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I use counter to statistics file row number in Mapper, example below code: public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) throws IOException { try { reporter.incrCounter("row", "num", 1); } catch (Throwable e) { e.printStackTrace(); throw new RuntimeException(e); } } Could everyone tell me whether there are any risks do so=A3=BF Thanks=A3=AC LiuLei --0016369cff89ed2c74049a3e08eb-- From general-return-2855-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 03:33:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82692 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 03:33:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 03:33:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 89607 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 03:33:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88966 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 03:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88945 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 03:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of venkatesh.kowluru@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:33:23 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so191252wye.35 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:33:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yq2UqVJEl6iu3pbIY8CGiWLpBY8rKwzWFBDFO18nDlQ=; b=QBO0btcuTcQ2+CBw8y1PDtiMKWS/kK4woA88R0ykLacjSXDfgH9gHHCbQNV3bDABM2 SM8VSHOzDHbxXNAypwnnetHsI6vASOSWR4Wnpsj542s9yoqKrXvARXTmSO8mHGTFMAg5 1SR186T3m4uX4YOq6wb8gzj94MEjE1mzNeOlA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qarwbQ/IQgLrpaHm3ZaexUSbHO7UYpvAURZ/bgQrLN6GS8Cw56ZV6nSEWSFu6wGUqs P6cLQDS2iAFqAljdmNIybn7FwRv4alEZ0VgFV7ktS5sorq/rUOnpZft5A5t3sU7oVQdU +CfbyYCGFAvnzP4l5X+ky/LB+oqd1uclw711Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.127.132 with SMTP id g4mr1725488wbs.36.1295494382846; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:33:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.143.141 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:33:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:33:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: use counter to statistics file row number From: venkatesh kavuluri To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0eea7f827a049a3eca52 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65a0eea7f827a049a3eca52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Bcc general@. This is for Hadoop project level discussions. Includingmapre= duce -user@) Liu, If you want the count of number of records in your input data set, the map/reduce framework provides a default counter "Map input records". The only caution to follow regarding the custom counters is to not exceed 20 pe= r application as they are very expensive. Generally counters are used to trac= k few important pieces of information. Thanks, Venkatesh Kavuluri 2011/1/19 lei liu > I use counter to statistics file row number in Mapper, example below cod= e: > > public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, > OutputCollector output, Reporter reporter) > throws IOException { > > try { > > reporter.incrCounter("row", "num", 1); > > } catch (Throwable e) { > e.printStackTrace(); > throw new RuntimeException(e); > } > } > > Could everyone tell me whether there are any risks do so=A3=BF > > > Thanks=A3=AC > > LiuLei > --0016e65a0eea7f827a049a3eca52-- From general-return-2856-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 06:52:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36782 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 06:52:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 06:52:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 19831 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 06:52:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19581 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 06:52:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19573 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 06:52:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:52:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:52:28 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so257993fxm.35 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:52:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IvMNy3sEV5pe+sGidoo5Gi9ZO5rRh8X0b/FYpyzkZVs=; b=QKxpEBT4TBkN5HqdzpTeINxJOpoyC5lJK/II9w+10Qepg+qVXLvcPWOl48UBCHqMqQ 0U97p99I9ePrTxJWJN1xGOslAAH1bM2fiNq0iiMRgMo7XdEzwOpfz0v9j5cDsLIm7nk1 xGTZCz9T67B9a0TsRGQVKMsEogO5WYYIyZr14= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KoUGd6+s7J5I38QIgQaMtnGmx6Q+79lWobf8v3zBF3AOMG9mZfjQWyL281YJ6bQfDj AJC9ifdF5Q1/SORKO39XRXBs5PgBTXn5M7rwf8OKtRNdFV4faaFB0soBlWSt6IgAcArH a25gO4baF846RFzcYLYKOevpPMCn6ITILKMAA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.246.1 with SMTP id y1mr961013mur.69.1295506326969; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.102.48.15 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:52:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:52:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367ed58f6c5df8049a419213 --0016367ed58f6c5df8049a419213 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There are two input paths, example: /user/test1/ and /user/test2/ path. Can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time? Thanks, LiuLei --0016367ed58f6c5df8049a419213-- From general-return-2857-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 13:19:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81908 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 13:19:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 13:19:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19908 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 13:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19578 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 13:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19570 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 13:19:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:19:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:19:39 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so584198wwd.29 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:19:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xpVmxUP98wKnzTWlDslr7Xod9LPlGT1YU1Aqj+/R0rk=; b=Zfwj+6B51NbkdFkGv27xJgZSKT4tD0g4x11EBTOEWRKg49UwY4P5fj0huVM1ZX+ApV bGWhukV8pcgO+GMAxxXPK+I0PZ8VAg1YzRFzghMb3dwoSJbr7V7FJQvM9069f9oQK15R 6ovcjH0kzRu8t/SH2ZTdObbjSouUADBGYnn3E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IFevlY76+dt1HmX+BkBkNUVXStcqq8Mg9QLBhuqSiBSzDLFhGWGJBt4R9aaZ/H1Jjf ZFJzx2GGFjNCL5YZr/GiFpBrbbUyvfV9DzaMPRtBFsKlJC2sRJpDjj0+g1CUqI634QDA RDz9dIgZfOjrkj2dGX10LCHQBUVRQY94tUuhI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.165.85 with SMTP id d63mr1925094wel.12.1295529556319; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:19:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:19:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:19:16 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: HadoopDFSFileReadWrite.java ??? From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6469722002021049a46fb57 --0016e6469722002021049a46fb57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Helllo .. I try access hadoopDFS exemple in follow link : http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopDfsReadWriteExample?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=HadoopDFSFileReadWrite.java I got a error: You are not allowed to do AttachFile on this page. I am login at wiki .. thanks --0016e6469722002021049a46fb57-- From general-return-2858-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 15:35:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93157 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 15:35:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 15:35:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 70914 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 15:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70633 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 15:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70625 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 15:35:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of msegel@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:35:32 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0KF644o008876 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:06:04 -0600 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 59E6C488A72E for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id Bj92C3vHHGo6u12G for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0KFZBvm016609 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:11 -0600 Received: from hq-ex-mb02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::880d:318e:e860:a8db]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:03 -0600 From: "Segel, Mike" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:35:09 -0600 Subject: RE: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time Thread-Topic: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time Thread-Index: Acu4bqJ842BI5LKBTomJObN5D4dJvQASLMCA Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 First a caveat... I'm going from memory and I haven't had my first cup of= coffee yet... :-) The answer is it depends. If your input is a directory, then I believe that you will pick up all of= the files in the directory. If you are trying to specify just two files... I don't believe so. (Now watch. I'm wrong and I do need to get more sleep.) HTH -Mike -----Original Message----- From: lei liu [mailto:liulei412@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:52 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same= time There are two input paths, example: /user/test1/ and /user/test2/ path. = Can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time? Thanks, LiuLei The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and i= s intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseminatio= n, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents= , is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in err= or, please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and = any copy of it from your computer or paper files. From general-return-2859-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 15:59:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73356 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 15:59:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 15:59:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 16627 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 15:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16440 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 15:59:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16405 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 15:59:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:59:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.176] (HELO mail-gx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:59:28 +0000 Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so151697gxk.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:59:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MNIFsyVv8Uo3Ce6KAHl/cWmTU4QItUR/Hqihfk6TiYg=; b=aOynoNIPxCwPlnUzkTXwXJhX3CFrssCxxSBH2anZzp9JUNs2PV1ph7r0dbULBtd9+w 6HFF2cG1YjxPui4vzghmwzAYrEZQR7JIg8h3HeCH3g38I7Kn+sq9AqdHu9AxI8YEEr6e G8w3+ecvUwYibjL0TRLS/YwWqqUU7TrFbIh1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ufbOSbZB1K/s6lqc8g5KmbMOF1mkSz5AqMG+S72bRC/YKosbGMO0vr9qsYUaErCQvr 7l8bFSGkAONdPus19OTRVbbyjzqb0H3CH42JdR7z4tq2ds0VbhBkXRDmFmHNYLyRTOHc HeX5zt6lcWjFY7ZSm/CwlOA6X08P1PE+K/T6U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.214.12 with SMTP id m12mr2557028ybg.371.1295539147648; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:59:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.9.9 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:59:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:59:07 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: How to write on HDFS by WEbServer From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd35714b030dc049a49363c --000e0cd35714b030dc049a49363c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello.. I start a first implementation in hadoop. I see some example how to write on hadoop.. i have a question ... I have java code to write on HDFS ... i run it calling : hadoop jar MyJarToWriteOnHdfs it will run my program and write on HDFS ..ok I need make this concept : WebServer ---> MyJarToWriteOnHdfs ---> HDFS My question is : 1) I need put a embedded Jetty in my MyJarToWriteOnHdfs run it like a job on Hadoop ? or 2) I create a webserver , put it on TOMCAT my webserver write a file in hadoop ? thanks --000e0cd35714b030dc049a49363c-- From general-return-2860-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 16:19:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9585 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 16:19:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 16:19:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 58129 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 16:19:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57662 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 16:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57654 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 16:19:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [159.226.40.9] (HELO software.ict.ac.cn) (159.226.40.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:19:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 17724 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 16:18:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xieys) (210.76.197.239) by software.ict.ac.cn with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 16:18:29 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:17:41 +0800 From: "=?utf-8?B?eGlleWVzaGFu?=" To: "=?utf-8?B?Z2VuZXJhbA==?=" , "=?utf-8?B?bWFwcmVkdWNlLXVzZXJAaGFkb29wLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc=?=" References: Subject: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IFJlOiBIb3cgdG8gdXNlIGNvbWJpbmVyIGluIGhhZG9vcCBzdHJlYW1pbmc=?= Message-ID: <201101210017085620407@software.ict.ac.cn> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 23 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon204443083360_=====" --=====003_Dragon204443083360_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQpIYWRvb3AgMC4yMS4wJ3MgY29tYmluZXIgY291bGQgYmUgY21kIGFuZCBpdCBqdXN0IHNvbHZl cyBteSBwcm9ibGVtLlRoYW5rIGFsbCBvZiB5b3UuVGhhbmtzXl9eIA0KDQoNCjIwMTEtMDEtMjEg DQoNCg0KDQp4aWV5ZXNoYW4gDQoNCg0KDQrlj5Hku7bkurrvvJogS29qaSBOb2d1Y2hpIA0K5Y+R 6YCB5pe26Ze077yaIDIwMTEtMDEtMTkgIDAzOjQ4OjMxIA0K5pS25Lu25Lq677yaIG1hcHJlZHVj ZS11c2VyQGhhZG9vcC5hcGFjaGUub3JnIA0K5oqE6YCB77yaIA0K5Li76aKY77yaIFJlOiBIb3cg dG8gdXNlIGNvbWJpbmVyIGluIGhhZG9vcCBzdHJlYW1pbmcgDQogDQooQmNjIGdlbmVyYWxALiBU aGlzIGlzIGZvciBIYWRvb3AgcHJvamVjdCBsZXZlbCBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRzIGFuZA0KZGlzY3Vz c2lvbnMuIGh0dHA6Ly9oYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy9tYWlsaW5nX2xpc3RzLmh0bWwgLiBVc2lu Zw0KbWFwcmVkdWNlLXVzZXJAKQ0KWWVzaGFuLCANCldoaWNoIHZlcnNpb24gb2YgaGFkb29wIGFy ZSB5b3UgdXNpbmc/DQpPZmZpY2lhbGx5LCBjb21iaW5lciBmb3Igbm9uLWphdmEgY29tbWFuZCB3 YXMgYWRkZWQgaW4gMC4yMQ0KaHR0cHM6Ly9pc3N1ZXMuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy9qaXJhL2Jyb3dzZS9I QURPT1AtNDg0Mg0KYnV0IEnCuWQgYmV0IHNvbWUgb2YgdGhvc2UgMC4yMHMgaGF2ZSB0aGlzIGJh Y2twb3J0ZWQuDQpLb2ppDQpPbiAxLzE4LzExIDEyOjA2IEFNLCAiSGFyc2ggSiIgPHF3ZXJ0eW1h bmlhY0BnbWFpbC5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiBSaWdodCBub3csIHRoZSBDb21iaW5lciBoYXMgdG8g YmUgYSBKYXZhIENsYXNzLiBBIGNvbW1hbmQgaXMNCj4gdW5hY2NlcHRhYmxlLCBhcyBub3RlZCBo ZXJlOg0KPiBodHRwOi8vd2lraS5hcGFjaGUub3JnL2hhZG9vcC9IYWRvb3BTdHJlYW1pbmcNCj4g DQo+IE9uIFR1ZSwgSmFuIDE4LCAyMDExIGF0IDE6MzAgUE0sIHhpZXllc2hhbiA8eGlleWVzaGFu QHNvZnR3YXJlLmljdC5hYy5jbj4NCj4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiBoaSxhbGwNCj4+IA0KPj4gICAgIEkg d2FudCB0byB1c2UgY29tYmluZXIgaW4gaGFkb29wIHN0cmVhbWluZywgYnV0IGNvbWJpbmVyIGlz IG5vdCB0aGUgc2FtZQ0KPj4gYXMgbWFwcGVyIG9yIHJlZHVjZXIgaW4gc3RyZWFtaW5nLkhvdyBj b3VsZCBJIGRvIHRoaXM/DQo+PiAgICAgVGhhbmtzIQ0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+IFlvdXJzLA0KPj4g DQo+PiBZZXNoYW4gWGllDQo+PiANCj4+IDIwMTEtMDEtMTgNCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+IHhp ZXllc2hhbg0KPj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQo+IC0tDQo+IEhhcnNoIEoNCj4gd3d3LmhhcnNoai5j b20NCj4gDQo= --=====003_Dragon204443083360_=====-- From general-return-2861-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 17:09:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33859 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 17:09:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 17:09:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 50386 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 17:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50105 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 17:09:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49972 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 17:09:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:09:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:09:13 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so836794fxm.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:08:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IHAqa3u23qoOTzFzau9YGhTFfCUEAGEgaN7/SKz7OOQ=; b=ayvc9biKk/iY4OzgHvw9CN1gSHutFFN9XxiLCEs7wbmHLn4+PQk1AyMa4S/F/i1O8O fkJi4fcIYcRY2Nb2jyhzmLeBKraO7Ybu5IMISUudkAJpLSUdeZh1ZTL7NhlA1obsFJSL MnIoHs61Pp3erILw8QaSbTyKpbjrkDT9JaxGM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ko0YR6Fq3iGsYIY9ZhXhLx2Is9ZESW5aP0GTLJHRHNWuxwmPqfQ9iu42moReKpaqkP 3RMHuwolteb8WMwWQmvLudFB3o5MHR/Ra/TOSoiUDA2Ys5An+n4Vb+tBYLMw9LeQQ96M NdaTGFmcir8gLfmZ2ubflObTDsGUc5bAlY/vk= Received: by 10.223.116.1 with SMTP id k1mr2328967faq.51.1295543333538; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:08:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.200 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:08:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:38:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to write on HDFS by WEbServer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well if you are trying only to write files to Hadoop's Distributed File System, you can simply get that done with (2). If you are planning to run MapReduce jobs (a good bunch of them), then you would need something more specific/elaborate to suit your exact needs (Either managing a set of jars, or configuring jobs live from the webapp and submitting, etc.). On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Alessandro Binhara wro= te: > Hello.. > > I start a first implementation in hadoop. > I see some example how to write on hadoop.. > > i have a question ... > I have =A0java code to =A0write on HDFS ... > > i run it calling : > hadoop jar MyJarToWriteOnHdfs > > it will run my program and write on HDFS ..ok > > I need make this concept : > WebServer ---> MyJarToWriteOnHdfs =A0---> HDFS > > My question is : > 1) I need put a =A0embedded Jetty in my MyJarToWriteOnHdfs =A0run it like= a job > on Hadoop ? > or > 2) I create a webserver , put it on TOMCAT my webserver write a file in > hadoop ? > > thanks > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2862-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 17:36:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44029 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 17:36:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 17:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 42970 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 17:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42209 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 17:36:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42196 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 17:36:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:36:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:36:34 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so270621gwj.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:36:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+ADQVwPiq9FxYhBEYkfU/wNnzOJCNLPY6Fyo3JwPpZc=; b=LMQlEZMbo7CQBCGvkprikPrFm8YO6ZzROsV7Owimp/k8XUd7ddhANxAkYzSG+i5WlS z+IBOK5rJKODVg0tKXJK+9x78dF0gRCjjnGrp86+uuQdeB22R1e5Fftjij07BLref5OI a+lIZaWxECHLGLupeKSQF6poWNej4YyrTsBk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=adIdAuyt0zmJbZz92Rqed6BSKDt20J36VTeVKHT/N7FUFx85oaA2tBQx9sMROFGBdm MIeDhGj1KpcL5D6jGoro2BCG8alSpJjYyfHQcPgecnt1VxE5s9fYUeB49cdVaQKK1a3p XDK+19YPZaOFAqhBi3OFa6pwvlrZlezKWrj6M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.225.16 with SMTP id x16mr2843256ybg.86.1295544973925; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.9.9 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:36:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:36:13 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to write on HDFS by WEbServer From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd47e62f61d01049a4a915f --000e0cd47e62f61d01049a4a915f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well in second case : Tomcat --> webserver --> HDFS .. my example run here from the shell hadoop jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar HadooHdfsHello thats ok.. i try run directly in java line. i think to write on hdfs , it need a enviroment of hadoop. In a java aplication or webserver it will work ? i try run my java example.. and a i have a problema with jar root@master:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute from HahoopHdfsHello.jar thanks for answer .. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Well if you are trying only to write files to Hadoop's Distributed > File System, you can simply get that done with (2). > > If you are planning to run MapReduce jobs (a good bunch of them), then > you would need something more specific/elaborate to suit your exact > needs (Either managing a set of jars, or configuring jobs live from > the webapp and submitting, etc.). > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Alessandro Binhara > wrote: > > Hello.. > > > > I start a first implementation in hadoop. > > I see some example how to write on hadoop.. > > > > i have a question ... > > I have java code to write on HDFS ... > > > > i run it calling : > > hadoop jar MyJarToWriteOnHdfs > > > > it will run my program and write on HDFS ..ok > > > > I need make this concept : > > WebServer ---> MyJarToWriteOnHdfs ---> HDFS > > > > My question is : > > 1) I need put a embedded Jetty in my MyJarToWriteOnHdfs run it like a > job > > on Hadoop ? > > or > > 2) I create a webserver , put it on TOMCAT my webserver write a file in > > hadoop ? > > > > thanks > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --000e0cd47e62f61d01049a4a915f-- From general-return-2863-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 18:21:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68878 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 18:21:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 18:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 42577 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 18:21:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42174 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42166 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 18:21:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:21:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:21:47 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so298935gyf.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:21:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.230.9 with SMTP id jk9mr2969069icb.519.1295547686009; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:21:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.168.198 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:21:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:21:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a0739d3de7049a4b337e --20cf3054a0739d3de7049a4b337e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 LiuLei: Yes. What you're looking for is TextInputFormat.addPath() (assuming you're talking about text). You can call this multiple times and add multiple input paths if they are all of the same data format (i.e. text). If you have multiple paths that contain different format data, you'll need to use MultipleInputs. See the javadoc for details on usage. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:52 AM, lei liu wrote: > There are two input paths, example: /user/test1/ and /user/test2/ path. > Can > one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time? > > > Thanks, > > LiuLei > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --20cf3054a0739d3de7049a4b337e-- From general-return-2864-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 18:33:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91636 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 18:33:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 18:33:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 68556 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 18:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67730 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 18:33:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67716 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 18:33:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:33:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.211] (HELO QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:33:27 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xuEF1f0051uE5Es5BuZ719; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:33:07 +0000 Received: from [10.72.184.42] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xuYw1f0012SbwD53cuYyji; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:33:05 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-39--586405111 Subject: Re: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:32:54 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-39--586405111 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As defined in http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html , please send user questions to mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org. -- Owen On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric Sammer wrote: > LiuLei: > > Yes. What you're looking for is TextInputFormat.addPath() (assuming > you're > talking about text). You can call this multiple times and add > multiple input > paths if they are all of the same data format (i.e. text). If you have > multiple paths that contain different format data, you'll need to use > MultipleInputs. See the javadoc for details on usage. > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:52 AM, lei liu wrote: > >> There are two input paths, example: /user/test1/ and /user/test2/ >> path. >> Can >> one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> LiuLei >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com --Apple-Mail-39--586405111-- From general-return-2865-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 20 21:03:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92827 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2011 21:03:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 21:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 85732 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 21:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85675 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2011 21:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85667 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2011 21:03:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:03:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akimball83@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:03:08 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so951925bwz.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:02:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=i9zH9SaP+2h++V55Ej+RVaq22drwXEyGZf2eq6Qr83o=; b=BqERhZCC4yy/WxqaKkxxyKyO0DivdWA6coMlanin2uNLeNhWn5gcxABm6ha6vl15al 4tKoCN8vvnUmC+HsDZe6GNjbqtpAjb18l6Gbnpyv9Fs5al5rc5XyYAKJWBNQ+CKpq4pi zQbMr2e7YYGkM4Do49bQ5reaAm/WNeB3pz03A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=H76RWLMb+zrKwpr7Mzfss0nigJOCQ3jNjGvOcMLG2V/uCB6avcn5JHk5yAythl4kSe zEmt//0rlojm/7+F0KuGKydblHRwvfe7QIqCKjYj+0wNNpYw5UpbxghBoPGZqOyGEwuw 76HVVuGo5dfybQCDSGJwvdkxNlAn77rNEkC5Y= Received: by 10.204.62.73 with SMTP id w9mr2351075bkh.11.1295557260809; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:01:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.61.138 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:54:48 -0800 (PST) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:54:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: February SF Hadoop Meetup -- Feb 9, 2011 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c923ad511664049a4d6e53 --001636c923ad511664049a4d6e53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hadoop fans, After the successful first edition of the SF Hadoop meetup, we plan to keep the momentum rolling with regular meetups. The second SF Hadoop meetup will be held Wednesday, February 9, 2011, from 6pm to 8pm. CBS Interactive has offered to host the meetup at their office at 235 2nd St, San Francisco. This space is larger than the one used in January; we hope this will better accommodate the number of people who'd like to attend. Like the previous meetup, we will continue to use the discussion-based "unconference" format. At the beginning of the meetup we will collaboratively construct an agenda consisting of several discussion breakout groups. All participants may propose a topic and volunteer to facilitate a discussion. All members of the Hadoop community are welcome to attend. Please RSVP at http://www.meetup.com/hadoopsf/calendar/16123193/ so we know how many people to expect. Refreshments will be provided. Regards, - Aaron Kimball --001636c923ad511664049a4d6e53-- From general-return-2866-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 21 05:58:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11019 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2011 05:58:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2011 05:58:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21436 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 05:58:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21148 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 05:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21139 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2011 05:58:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:58:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of liulei412@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:57:54 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1516533fxm.35 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1DKPDKPZN0DbfhHxXe0yH3+hgGMbDBvYVsD4RSTq0W4=; b=mf76sOk1CTZXu8vldzo7jjk9l37CIi0B0OVYFJtvmQoe/hv0pKc8Ym3p8ki+ToLt3X 1x7cPMSMc4FPGGBEMHtn0ZdrLEG1k+0/9ApUKe/XFLSzq3lx7N/+n1GKIe2XokBffXy2 /EQEASBdlAH7jU0kFwDjAFmIGC71pcF9yraPs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SPHOBFnxoQcx8t6Bo/l4gGRkXFl7LYlyiXv1Tk1JjwyfM/xX/rmI6YCqaSSwlL3J8W oBhFDp8NlilshrHpOLWU/7UuxblWssswuyAxNFpqiKStmA9QtosvNXv+f1CQ2Rez93f9 /Fl5s5RinYmAF25m48fThuq+flIky8htbk4Sk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.168.5 with SMTP id v5mr12474muo.82.1295589453696; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:57:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.228.4 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:57:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:57:33 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: can one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time From: lei liu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369896eb298ee4049a54ed20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016369896eb298ee4049a54ed20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks everyone=A3=AC I detailed describe my question. There are two input direcoties:/user/test1/ and /user/test2/ path, I want to join the two direcoties content, in order to join the two directories, I need to identit= y the content from which directory, so I use below code in mapper: private int tag =3D -1; @Override public void configure(JobConf conf) { try { this.conf =3D conf; String pathsToAliasStr =3D conf.get("paths.to.alias");//example= : conf.set("paths.to.alias", "0=3D/user/test1/,1=3D/user/test2/" String[] pathsToAlias =3D pathsToAliasStr.split(","); Path fpath =3D new Path((new Path(conf.get("map.input.file"))).toUri().getPath()); String path =3D fpath.toUri().toString(); for (int i =3D 0; i < pathsToAlias.length; i++) { String[] pathToAlias =3D pathsToAlias[i].split("=3D"); if (path.startsWith(pathToAlias[1])) { tag =3D Integer.valueOf(pathToAlias[0].trim());//identi= ty current map instatnce are handling which directory content. } } } catch (Throwable e) { e.printStackTrace(); throw new RuntimeException(e); } } So when map method run=A3=AC the content are handled by the mapper are identified for same direcoty. I want to know whether one mapper instatnce only handle content of one directory at same time. Thanks LiuLei 2011/1/21 Eric Sammer > LiuLei: > > Yes. What you're looking for is TextInputFormat.addPath() (assuming you'r= e > talking about text). You can call this multiple times and add multiple > input > paths if they are all of the same data format (i.e. text). If you have > multiple paths that contain different format data, you'll need to use > MultipleInputs. See the javadoc for details on usage. > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:52 AM, lei liu wrote: > > > There are two input paths, example: /user/test1/ and /user/test2/ path. > > Can > > one map instance handle many data of input paths at the same time? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > LiuLei > > > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > --0016369896eb298ee4049a54ed20-- From general-return-2867-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 21 07:48:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60258 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2011 07:48:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2011 07:48:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 33998 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 07:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33635 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 07:48:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33621 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2011 07:48:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:48:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:48:24 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0L7lT56031837; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.73.153.37) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:47:29 -0800 Subject: Re: use counter to statistics file row number MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:47:27 -0800 CC: "mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <12CD2F7A-2CC1-41B9-A43C-02CD52EF8DF6@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi , mapreduce-user seems like a great place for this discussion. general = does not. Thanks! E14 On Jan 19, 2011, at 7:33 PM, venkatesh kavuluri wrote: > (Bcc general@. This is for Hadoop project level discussions. = Includingmapreduce > -user@) >=20 > Liu, >=20 > If you want the count of number of records in your input data set, the > map/reduce framework provides a default counter "Map input records". = The > only caution to follow regarding the custom counters is to not exceed = 20 per > application as they are very expensive. Generally counters are used to = track > few important pieces of information. >=20 > Thanks, > Venkatesh Kavuluri >=20 > 2011/1/19 lei liu >=20 >> I use counter to statistics file row number in Mapper, example below = code: >>=20 >> public void map(LongWritable key, Text value, >> OutputCollector output, Reporter = reporter) >> throws IOException { >>=20 >> try { >>=20 >> reporter.incrCounter("row", "num", 1); >>=20 >> } catch (Throwable e) { >> e.printStackTrace(); >> throw new RuntimeException(e); >> } >> } >>=20 >> Could everyone tell me whether there are any risks do so=A3=BF >>=20 >>=20 >> Thanks=A3=AC >>=20 >> LiuLei >>=20 From general-return-2868-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 21 17:31:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85311 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2011 17:31:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2011 17:31:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 39316 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 17:31:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39052 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 17:31:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39037 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2011 17:31:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:31:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.18] (HELO EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:31:14 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-3.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.18]) with mapi; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:30:53 -0800 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:33:03 -0800 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move project split down a level Thread-Index: Acu5kPR2iOv28KACSOGkb1qd5xdmBA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 1/14/11 11:01 AM, "Konstantin Shvachko" wrote: >We actually still haven't recovered from the projects split. >We are still fixing HDFS and MR scripts with several jiras open. > >If we start this re-split now again before the major release >we risk to get into the same mess, and it will create more work >for the community. > >I see Nigel's point that packaging will get easier, and developers >will push less buttons when they commit. >It will delay the release - this is what worries me. > >Thanks, >--Konstantin I don't see how it would change any of those scripts. All three projects would still be isolated with the same internal path structures, their paths relative to each other in svn would be the only difference. For developers, this might mean simply using 'svn switch' once and nothing more.=20 From general-return-2869-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 22 00:10:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3153 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2011 00:10:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2011 00:10:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 76728 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 00:10:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76469 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 00:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86002 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2011 05:22:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" , "user@oodt.apache.org" , "general@incubator.apache.org" , "dev@tika.apache.org" , "user@tika.apache.org" , "whirr-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "gora-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "sis-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:21:51 -0800 Subject: [Call for Papers] ICSE Software Engineering for Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop Thread-Topic: [Call for Papers] ICSE Software Engineering for Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop Thread-Index: Acu5KxxM39jWOK4WQrylk0TCV1w0Uw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.72] X-Source-Sender: chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org (apologies for the cross posting) *** PLEASE NOTE - the deadline for submitting papers has been extended by 1= week to 1/28/2011! *** Please consider submitting a paper to the ICSE 2011 Software Engineering fo= r Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop to be held Sunday, May 22, 2011, at th= e Hilton Hawaiian Village Resort in Waikiki, Honolulu, HI. This workshop focuses on identifying the grand challenges that lay before u= s in the realm of software engineering for cloud computing. We will debate = existing notions of SE for the construction of cloud services and for their= deployment. We will discuss and evangelize individual successes in the fie= ld and attempt to identify the key ingredients that enabled that success. P= articipants in this workshop will take a role in helping to formulate a lon= g-term, concrete software engineering agenda for cloud and will have an opp= ortunity to share in and contribute to the existing =93tribal knowledge=94 = for cloud-related software engineering. We invite high quality submissions of technical and research papers, as wel= l as research demonstrations describing original and unpublished results of= research relevant to software engineering for cloud. Authors are asked to = reserve a section in their submitted papers for identifying their suggested= near-term and long-term challenge areas for the field. The workshop seeks to focus discussion around the ways that the disruptive = effect of cloud computing is engendering a new set of principles and approa= ches to software engineering. Specific topics of interest include, but are = not limited to: Topic Areas of Interest: - Agile Software development on the cloud - Architecting Applications using the cloud - Benchmarking and Performance Metrics in the cloud - Cloud Application Reliability - Distributed collaboration on the cloud - Interoperability and Portability challenges in multi-cloud environments - Open Source Cloud Environments: Hadoop, Eucalyptus and other programming = paradigms, languages and environments for the Cloud - Requirements Elicitation effectiveness when using cloud service abstracti= ons - Secure Software Engineering in the Cloud - Software Engineering Practices using popular cloud vendor services - Software Engineering tools - Software Project Estimations, Testing,Verification and Validation over cl= oud service abstractions Submission Guidelines: Submissions may take one of two acceptable forms. Research paper contributi= ons may be submitted with a maximum length of 7 pages, and must conform to = ICSE 2011 paper formatting guidelines [1]. Research demonstration submissio= ns are limited to 1 page in the conference proceedings and will be given du= ring he two 15-minute breakout sessions. All submissions must be in English and in PDF format [2]. An abstract must = accompany each research paper contribution. The workshop website [3] will b= e updated to include a link to the CyberChairPRO online submission system o= nce it has been set up. All accepted papers will be published and dissemina= ted on the workshop website after the conclusion of the workshop. Review and Evaluation Criteria: Each submission will be reviewed by at least two members of the Program Com= mittee and will be assessed on the basis of originality, importance and rel= evance of contribution to SE for cloud, soundness, quality of presentation,= and an appropriate comparison to related work. The program committee as a = whole will make final decisions about acceptance. Workshop Organizers and PC Chairs: Nenad Medvidovic , University of Southern California T.S. Mohan, Infosys Technologies Chris A. Mattmann, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Owen O=92Malley, Yahoo, Inc. Important Dates: Paper Submission: 21.January.2011 Paper Notification: 21.February.2011 Camera Ready: 10.March.2011 Website: http://sites.google.com/site/icsecloud2011 Program Committee: Andrew F. Hart, NASA JPL, United States Ben Reed, Yahoo, United States Craig Lee, Aerospace Corp., United States Daniel J. Crichton, NASA JPL, United States David C. Kale, Children's Hospital LA, United States David M. Woollard, Project WBS, United States Dennis Kubes, Bit.ly, United States Eric Dashofy, Aerospace Corp., United States Jacek Becla, Stanford National Accelerator Lab, United States Justin Erenkrantz, Project WBS/Apache, United States Luca Cinquini, NASA JPL, United States Mohanakrishna, Infosys, India Nabor Mendonca, Univ. of Fortaleza, Brazil Sanjay Radia, Yahoo, United States Schahram Dustdar, TU Wien, Vienna Srinivas Padmanabhuni, Infosys, India Stefan Tai, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany YN Srikant, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India Links: [1] ICSE-2011 Format: http://2011.icse-conferences.org/content-submission-g= uidelines [2] ACM Submission Policies: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedin= gs-templates [3] Workshop Website: http://sites.google.com/site/icsecloud2011 About ICSE:=20 The International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) is the premier = software engineering conference, providing a forum for researchers, practit= ioners and educators to present and discuss the most recent innovations, tr= ends, experiences and concerns in the field of software engineering. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= From general-return-2870-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 22 07:26:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39574 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2011 07:26:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2011 07:26:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 27634 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 07:26:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27339 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 07:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27327 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2011 07:26:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c159.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.159]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0M7Q0kn046708 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:26:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295681161; bh=dT6xwKl7Y46GQ3iLz5d+Ot7HOpJMagEL4x40SGXDBVo=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject: Date:References; b=RLGphB+wugKDTVw+knd5ezJXF6kIgqxsi3eQK3YwwieXwHWThOHEByiJCoU2pP0ba GeMInyhfIW6ZwCoZ+todfZLWhZKZnhU1tAeIoL86c7wtSLoNjOBnnJGy2AGF/XDtIA FNeSQhTNG1WbE5IHmuOg0TJnDtK6XNjFcpKaBMsQ= Message-Id: <0A3C433F-DABA-4CF5-B464-4E890036EB75@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <70369193-35EB-4ECD-AB40-99F8F9424C4D@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-120--453619100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:26:00 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <388582DF-FC85-49D1-A89C-1F36CE34A0E2@yahoo-inc.com> <04705B3C-49A9-46B3-8AA9-5673EFBDE544@yahoo-inc.com> <74BDFA74-DB12-4109-89DF-B353FC7296C4@yahoo-inc.com> <70369193-35EB-4ECD-AB40-99F8F9424C4D@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-120--453619100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > IAC, I agree - we've spent too much time talking and too little doing > actual work. Let me get the job done and folks can then weigh-in on > the release at later point, folks might be willing to consider this > more positively once they see the branch, the change-log etc. > > Of course we need to get the small number of remaining patches into > trunk asap for 0.22 and beyond. FYI - I've merged changes to Common's branch-0.20-security (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security ). Some statistics: # Total of 441 jiras are covered across Common (164), HDFS (90) and Map-Reduce (187). # 413 jiras out of the 441 are already committed to trunk. # 28 open jiras: Common (6), HDFS (1), Map-Reduce (21). # Of the 28 open jiras 7 are Patch Available. # I've ensured all commits have a jira - I had to open 3 jiras (one each in all sub-projects), they are included in the above stats. Arun --Apple-Mail-120--453619100-- From general-return-2871-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jan 22 14:22:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96799 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2011 14:22:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2011 14:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32606 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 14:22:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32241 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2011 14:22:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32233 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2011 14:22:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:22:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:22:43 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1402844qyk.14 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:22:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=GKd1xREhWjuOFqdEhPSXc6ORPpKxvJgRtHvS2hj97VA=; b=Rcc7cGEQa4sRRtUHDzqKK59uaAhGCSFNQ31sgmkjvkXGKGPp55PXw4+qP2kPIO6gdC 5cypqQBlq2FeRwN/A9FPS8swvcHT6OovCTpLgLv8qug8u8s9nMAkixpeuyTx58LB0Ivh LQj5ULscIcccbHuUM752YdQoD4lBe2vkw9C94= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=b29brjDPoJHwVISpFiN+FxcXUeg0s1/RPI1Onv1+nxKMxezxj+7V0nxIk9GDST/JBV kY1xglfzrMej/YTRKrIyuNM55AUfOX72sp0CcuQeiOgEBC7TqL3Jlxwofg/yan+15TQO CrYRAK7ZLI5NyoAboUbwtPPEg5aVGWqwTdLQQ= Received: by 10.229.99.76 with SMTP id t12mr1693254qcn.275.1295706142450; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.1.13] ([12.50.71.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17sm7529321qci.9.2011.01.22.06.22.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:22:21 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:22:18 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >=20 >> I think Roy's suggestion of applying the commits individually to the = branch >> from your current working branch would help with this. >>=20 >=20 > I am sure this is not what Roy suggested. Ian. I think the idea is = simple. to Quote Roy: b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if you don't have time. Arun has chosen option (c), that Roy also mentioned as a valid way of = doing it. > If you decide to donate to a non-profit organization you are free to = choose > the form of your donation. I think you are confusing a non-profit for a dumping ground.=20 Any organization (non-profit or for-profit) has responsibilities, and = their is always a tradeoff between features and risk. Any organization = can choose to not accept a donation. It comes down to give-and-take As Roy also mentioned, option (c) will be harder for others to test, and = get consensus about weather it is release worthy, let alone merge into = 0.22. >=20 > Thanks, > --Konstantin From general-return-2872-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 23 15:16:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76918 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2011 15:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2011 15:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 91188 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2011 15:16:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89865 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2011 15:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89835 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2011 15:15:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:15:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:15:52 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas02.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.209]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0NFFCQ5009551; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:15:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1295795713; bh=ecE1S+uHaJno+Bw9I6PWKR2Sgauada42c7lIQJLo2j4=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=vMWgh1LTpBYI+wSoYGJf1VpoZjee5W3yQm/DzZew+/Swdu60v2MsshEnpFYATi5qL mrMezNK+Qr1mO8hHV3kiBHsePSwpArDaaFLsyJROq7+xv4ifzQS3yfystoTGhMEsQH e5ib1TpJFuaa5hzNYuuxZMJF6Xnxa7P75jfGlnXY= Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.216]) with mapi; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:45:11 +0530 From: yahoohadoop To: "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "user@pig.apache.org" , "user@hive.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:45:08 +0530 Subject: Apache Hadoop India Summit 2011 Thread-Topic: Apache Hadoop India Summit 2011 Thread-Index: Acu7C9VNYFfkSjAATb2ocBMGxkVBugAAmlxQ Message-ID: <9C9FC731510CC94A8CDBA912E060F62ED1E454C1AE@EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1295793756.521925@eventbrite.com> In-Reply-To: <1295793756.521925@eventbrite.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9C9FC731510CC94A8CDBA912E060F62ED1E454C1AEEGLEX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_9C9FC731510CC94A8CDBA912E060F62ED1E454C1AEEGLEX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Hadoop enthusiasts, Yahoo! India R&D is proud to host second India Hadoop Summit which will tak= e place in Bangalore, India on February 16th, 2011. Participate in the biggest annual cloud event to learn about latest trends,= interact with experts, exchange ideas and see what large companies and sta= rtups are doing in the exciting space of Apache Hadoop and cloud computing. Please look at http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2011/01/hadoop-in= dia-summit-2011/ for more information. Best Regards, Basant Verma Yahoo India R&D, Hadoop --_000_9C9FC731510CC94A8CDBA912E060F62ED1E454C1AEEGLEX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-2873-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 24 11:37:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91291 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 11:37:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 11:37:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 51412 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 11:37:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51092 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 11:37:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51073 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 11:37:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:37:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:36:56 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4012805wwd.29 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:36:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uvyaV3g7znCkesab+sbpruIH9HC41x/jCHoNjdowEEQ=; b=nTN+vL2+B3FRBXJmHroj1gJFeTflrRRtTTwgZsc1HNRSIfzCOfGtTo4JTDelhkQ69f r639fZkwLCWlxotWYIaz7/lYtNPQQpk6tCNcHNw3oUskJ5KL0ATPfYphLJmxYlopumeS hbIanOYturO2Eog66Rj2neaGZz8c/b5tfV+BI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bRYIKJulQkXWCyR1BpEr4Ku5yWgLIG2V4rnqfY475MpxhcvuSsOzQ5ahxkNRmLUh+h PtcN7bnRoyfHWAG3EshV1vFkAKYbMtXw/+CJp7+u0UeRyBZB0qn5BiToBMaFHGUJI6MC 3RZkvZEU5j45jyJbYbWtmmgAQcYxAVELXbIYU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.220.219 with SMTP id o69mr3520579wep.57.1295868995124; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:36:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:36:35 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Problem write on HDFS From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7b91213dd8049a960397 --0016364c7b91213dd8049a960397 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello .. i solve problem in jar.. i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar in same jar dir. i configure a class path export CLASSPATH=.:$JAVA_HOME i got this erro in shell root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 1 more What is the problem? thanks --0016364c7b91213dd8049a960397-- From general-return-2874-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 24 14:55:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97593 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 14:55:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 14:55:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 43348 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 14:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42906 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 14:55:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42884 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 14:55:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:55:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qwertymaniac@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:54:53 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so4645370fxm.35 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:54:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j5pUXknRjXX7FXDQ2ww2kk4efi9DALgZBQlazYBlnbI=; b=lUnLrcPxVEoU8axdadPsQnc+iv1opUa0u0zwcDsihDdhqtP9rU0eewgEZgZ4bFBQ1p 0Dm64xvz/8oZmcJbXGvHj64CR061nHHS9ew1aR/OhoThwpr5IXfU8KmxjbbN8Fwm2fZs eTOjKryXvaAR8P29EZ6G6okQHDgE2fK5tOdT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xF0/z8i5G3shPWea0uVqwv88bq8iIp4IjMjGA8PKoxdxJozppzwQYroIWpD/rdeMJt P5ads5PIQWfYjfqRzei9nsSHvx+n9jqbiAOn4qo8jy4Bx4hTYuUhqSQyhXqBZxgflYCi Q7kmho0eFH/k/7WGXXakCDL8y0vXRxDLYPr3o= Received: by 10.223.95.202 with SMTP id e10mr4358535fan.32.1295880873131; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:54:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.200 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:54:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:24:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem write on HDFS To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The issue would definitely lie with your CLASSPATH. Ideally, while beginning development using Hadoop 0.20, it is better to use the `hadoop jar` command to launch jars of any kind that require Hadoop libraries; be it MapReduce or not. The command will ensure that all the classpath requirements for Hadoop-side libraries are satisfied, so you don't have to worry. Anyhow, try launching it this way: $ java -classpath hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar -jar HadoopHdfsHello.jar; # This should run just fine. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alessandro Binhara wro= te: > Hello .. > > i solve problem in jar.. > i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar =A0 in same jar dir. > > i configure a class path > export CLASSPATH=3D.:$JAVA_HOME > > i got this erro in shell > > root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Meth= od) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:1= 90) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.jav= a:301) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... 1 more > > > What is the problem? > > thanks > --=20 Harsh J www.harshj.com From general-return-2875-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 24 15:02:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99923 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 15:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 15:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 54384 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 15:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54032 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 15:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53497 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 15:02:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:02:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:02:08 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so4216374wwd.29 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:01:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qXf/ljHbQmicoTrwaIN1e3VQYZEnKjItOtoLjQrXSHE=; b=EwFGcvnWZlTKD9Gp3M3aouXHoMeHr6qt4xI/SwMnfSpk2FlhL0ArgwydqHBA6tW3jn fArPnk0qAdqxs4YIxRtFy2GjI7dHghzHTacsLHqi6OWdtkxAn7XQOSZhGdErxpgfv/Ub xs4Ft7FxjONCN1FqR59xbqQvvTobPgEeJQu98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wAsgYEQhR4ACvfk6ZuTJoYY2jTAVu897EoDZHcOLzcCa4YHiAyRYH50e+75EVIDvO6 MnZU6X0X0zBbOXKGEIx+qh9JSkTAb7kE2leFxGUds4sw4p6/YwjnbFvwiQI6D8m4M5GX RBDtz3JumUcGwl8PPHGZ8LndJXnd5Umf2Fs04= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.130 with SMTP id b2mr3782979wec.42.1295881308142; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:01:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:01:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:01:48 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem write on HDFS From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8c8d0afd78049a98e172 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dd8c8d0afd78049a98e172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ..i try java -classpath hadoop-core-0.20.1.jar -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar i got a same error.. i will try build a servlet and run on tomcat... i try many issues to config a classpath... all fail.. thanks On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Harsh J wrote: > The issue would definitely lie with your CLASSPATH. > > Ideally, while beginning development using Hadoop 0.20, it is better > to use the `hadoop jar` command to launch jars of any kind that > require Hadoop libraries; be it MapReduce or not. The command will > ensure that all the classpath requirements for Hadoop-side libraries > are satisfied, so you don't have to worry. > > Anyhow, try launching it this way: > $ java -classpath hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar -jar HadoopHdfsHello.jar; # > This should run just fine. > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alessandro Binhara > wrote: > > Hello .. > > > > i solve problem in jar.. > > i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar in same jar dir. > > > > i configure a class path > > export CLASSPATH=.:$JAVA_HOME > > > > i got this erro in shell > > > > root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > > org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration > > at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) > > ... 1 more > > > > > > What is the problem? > > > > thanks > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com > --0016e6dd8c8d0afd78049a98e172-- From general-return-2876-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 25 10:05:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1716 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 10:05:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 10:05:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12321 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 10:05:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11971 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 10:05:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11957 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 10:05:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:05:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:05:45 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0PA53DR011922 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.76.163) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:05:03 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:05:00 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <5101FEE7-4C57-49C7-841C-2A9BC7BE0464@yahoo-inc.com> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ian, No votes have been called for at the moment. Right now all arun's done = is create a branch and ask for feedback from folks who want to try it. = Most of the forward ports are already either committed or in a patch = available state, as arun mentioned. We'll work through the others as = individual JIRAs to allow everyone to kick the tires. That should avoid = issues with 0.22. =20 I don't anticipate votes etc, unless folks do want to try it and do = provide feedback. This is what runs at yahoo at the moment. I hope = people think it is worth trying. Thanks, E14 On Jan 22, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 > On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >=20 >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >>=20 >>> I think Roy's suggestion of applying the commits individually to the = branch >>> from your current working branch would help with this. >>>=20 >>=20 >> I am sure this is not what Roy suggested. Ian. I think the idea is = simple. >=20 > to Quote Roy: > b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn > and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch > source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then > RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. > Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if > you don't have time. >=20 >=20 > Arun has chosen option (c), that Roy also mentioned as a valid way of = doing it. >=20 >> If you decide to donate to a non-profit organization you are free to = choose >> the form of your donation. >=20 >=20 > I think you are confusing a non-profit for a dumping ground.=20 > Any organization (non-profit or for-profit) has responsibilities, and = their is always a tradeoff between features and risk. Any organization = can choose to not accept a donation. It comes down to give-and-take >=20 >=20 > As Roy also mentioned, option (c) will be harder for others to test, = and get consensus about weather it is release worthy, let alone merge = into 0.22. >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> Thanks, >> --Konstantin >=20 From general-return-2877-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 25 11:27:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31618 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 11:27:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 11:27:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 22219 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 11:27:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21935 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 11:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21927 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 11:27:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:27:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:27:50 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5539134wye.35 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zMo4Q8mJrPYrweZjtJLkAoFeWlG0LIZqe8sHe05Knbo=; b=psnSgAXwyltjZTp4bFSSA7cPnxn/N8/r4s2eravGX4KUlRJXMFNZnu0tRVhHHERyNc ZravW3sMYSPYAlS2YxMNRQ0Y4hJvnxtNR2MNP6bR3t4Gqt1cAyC4yp7YJBp6P2pm5yHy gNKj8Jt/nGxw/xSUs2GTcPjeJszYLyEeQI0OA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=V3cX9pbiQ+nRjhBAYEeISrSWcCycJ1VhEBaTbzAxBNcGq5wfZ9Vx+UqouZogakBK5C zVys9IQGonCTMGdlez+L+qx19fMPdFGdOl9dUYvarfwd+eaPjmbStqbMrLzJ7qG8cpSC uXS7KE3uXPfOOF5IpRl30cgHBvNiFy+QjFM0I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.155.75 with SMTP id i53mr3524034wek.27.1295954847734; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:27:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:27:27 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem write on HDFS From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b535a581a05049aaa0091 --0016e65b535a581a05049aaa0091 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I build a servlet with a hadoop... i think that tomcat enviroment will be find a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar .. but a get a same error *ype* Exception report *message*** *description* *The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.* *exception* javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet execution threw an exception *root cause* java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.OpenFileSystem(HadoopWriter.java:22) HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.(HadoopWriter.java:16) HadoopServletTest.doGet(HadoopServletTest.java:35) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:621) javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722) *note* *The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache Tomcat/7.0.6 logs.* The error can be a problem on my ubuntu server ? thanks On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > ..i try > java -classpath hadoop-core-0.20.1.jar -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar > > i got a same error.. > i will try build a servlet and run on tomcat... > i try many issues to config a classpath... all fail.. > > thanks > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Harsh J wrote: > >> The issue would definitely lie with your CLASSPATH. >> >> Ideally, while beginning development using Hadoop 0.20, it is better >> to use the `hadoop jar` command to launch jars of any kind that >> require Hadoop libraries; be it MapReduce or not. The command will >> ensure that all the classpath requirements for Hadoop-side libraries >> are satisfied, so you don't have to worry. >> >> Anyhow, try launching it this way: >> $ java -classpath hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar -jar HadoopHdfsHello.jar; # >> This should run just fine. >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alessandro Binhara >> wrote: >> > Hello .. >> > >> > i solve problem in jar.. >> > i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar in same jar dir. >> > >> > i configure a class path >> > export CLASSPATH=.:$JAVA_HOME >> > >> > i got this erro in shell >> > >> > root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar >> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >> > org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration >> > at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) >> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration >> > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) >> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >> > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) >> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) >> > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) >> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) >> > ... 1 more >> > >> > >> > What is the problem? >> > >> > thanks >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J >> www.harshj.com >> > > --0016e65b535a581a05049aaa0091-- From general-return-2878-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 25 14:52:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19275 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 14:52:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 14:52:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 62592 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 14:52:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62215 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 14:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62206 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 14:52:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:52:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:51:55 +0000 Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so2197860vws.35 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:51:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=XGRRBllNi9/V5K7Tog1ap1abFd6HOZwTd8qU9tkb5ic=; b=rCeVUvsBA3IpPwXpxN56dEJ3EnzRLilIemG3TQYz1w8RlDH2btoqszuRx5zeZu2Ocd GP/UiyROTkcsSmaYW55IKFe9QWQcmx0zZCQ3DWLjT9LueXKDV95LsqXcruGmYiNcA4B+ nd1ycYpSMe6gRKv6KPb/chsUhjZa+BTB1QOBU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=fIc59HVmt3UBYwQ0cqMr760piJdMIKBd6rHCHCM9kNt7QAYsOtIq9iDnaVPxO26eQ2 tbHDZXNs6pp3ijDLzikSXDrKOQIqV9t67M10R7mMzijzdMoN50Hsy8SryfJZzrsQ0iAB tm0Euct7Qr21CoW/7HWJhzm92cSs0Xbdd5PGU= Received: by 10.229.82.14 with SMTP id z14mr4845903qck.257.1295967093521; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.172.33.1] (h-64-236-138-3.aoltw.net [64.236.138.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g28sm10256331qck.13.2011.01.25.06.51.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:51:32 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <5101FEE7-4C57-49C7-841C-2A9BC7BE0464@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:51:24 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2E5193CC-8A01-4FA8-BE48-F59AD3750E41@Holsman.NET> References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> <5101FEE7-4C57-49C7-841C-2A9BC7BE0464@yahoo-inc.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Arun also mentioned that he has created a separate branch ( = http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security-p= atches/ ) for the individual patches.. so he is doing both.. so everyone = should be happy. --I On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > Hi Ian, >=20 > No votes have been called for at the moment. Right now all arun's = done is create a branch and ask for feedback from folks who want to try = it. Most of the forward ports are already either committed or in a = patch available state, as arun mentioned. We'll work through the others = as individual JIRAs to allow everyone to kick the tires. That should = avoid issues with 0.22. =20 >=20 > I don't anticipate votes etc, unless folks do want to try it and do = provide feedback. This is what runs at yahoo at the moment. I hope = people think it is worth trying. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > E14 >=20 > On Jan 22, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 19, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Ian Holsman = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I think Roy's suggestion of applying the commits individually to = the branch >>>> from your current working branch would help with this. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I am sure this is not what Roy suggested. Ian. I think the idea is = simple. >>=20 >> to Quote Roy: >> b) create a branch off of some prior Apache release point in svn >> and replay the internal Y! commits on that branch until the branch >> source code is identical to what you have tested locally. Then >> RM a tarball based on that branch and start a release vote. >> Since the history is now in svn, others could do the RM bit if >> you don't have time. >>=20 >>=20 >> Arun has chosen option (c), that Roy also mentioned as a valid way of = doing it. >>=20 >>> If you decide to donate to a non-profit organization you are free to = choose >>> the form of your donation. >>=20 >>=20 >> I think you are confusing a non-profit for a dumping ground.=20 >> Any organization (non-profit or for-profit) has responsibilities, and = their is always a tradeoff between features and risk. Any organization = can choose to not accept a donation. It comes down to give-and-take >>=20 >>=20 >> As Roy also mentioned, option (c) will be harder for others to test, = and get consensus about weather it is release worthy, let alone merge = into 0.22. >>=20 >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> --Konstantin >>=20 >=20 From general-return-2879-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 25 18:07:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80615 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 18:07:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 18:07:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 41420 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 18:07:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41332 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 18:07:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41324 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 18:07:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:07:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:07:43 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so58398wwd.29 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:07:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=w2OGkYupPW5qzHbrfg9Rhfco8h6SsRs0xAx60OuZ1n4=; b=PbduD774GHDx1TPXppIuTv4nY0MjkUxtlxehznVIlTjZYkpVdZozPYPZbSiHNXEx93 ViiRpEkP5zRY/+3Nt79PCgZEN+eh/yuUOdeKIBx5dhBvac+wpSB2RZFHkL2Gmjz4deB3 u/K0AVvuGGxi5Jsz1ErECoNe+Q3knsLGBpSMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RWPECJioEPKYxvStc4L6wXF1kPOrIlRyQLOJisirONHU2C78kedMVvZqVgDCmb2uES Pio694vvUMQwEZkrX2qIN/Km8qcX4dbi4BFNNCMxiXWZYxW1VVextXwke/r5xFFUZpW+ 1MgdWSWPx/KpEEeS0j9MEtupryFnWjYunTAMo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.150.134 with SMTP id z6mr139315wej.27.1295978843262; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:07:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:07:23 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem write on HDFS - SOLUTION From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daa8a596d183049aaf96e3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6daa8a596d183049aaf96e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello all.. i found the problem . A Hadoop jar file from a hadoop website has a problem. I copy a jar file from a Cloudera distribuition and error desapear .. If have a commiter from hadoop website.. please check the problem .. thanks On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > I build a servlet with a hadoop... > i think that tomcat enviroment will be find a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar .. > but a get a same error > > *ype* Exception report > > *message*** > > *description* *The server encountered an internal error () that prevented > it from fulfilling this request.* > > *exception* > > javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet execution threw an exception > > *root cause* > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.OpenFileSystem(HadoopWriter.java:22) > HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.(HadoopWriter.java:16) > HadoopServletTest.doGet(HadoopServletTest.java:35) > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:621) > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722) > > *note* *The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache > Tomcat/7.0.6 logs.* > > The error can be a problem on my ubuntu server ? > > thanks > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > >> ..i try >> java -classpath hadoop-core-0.20.1.jar -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar >> >> i got a same error.. >> i will try build a servlet and run on tomcat... >> i try many issues to config a classpath... all fail.. >> >> thanks >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Harsh J wrote: >> >>> The issue would definitely lie with your CLASSPATH. >>> >>> Ideally, while beginning development using Hadoop 0.20, it is better >>> to use the `hadoop jar` command to launch jars of any kind that >>> require Hadoop libraries; be it MapReduce or not. The command will >>> ensure that all the classpath requirements for Hadoop-side libraries >>> are satisfied, so you don't have to worry. >>> >>> Anyhow, try launching it this way: >>> $ java -classpath hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar -jar HadoopHdfsHello.jar; # >>> This should run just fine. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alessandro Binhara >>> wrote: >>> > Hello .. >>> > >>> > i solve problem in jar.. >>> > i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar in same jar dir. >>> > >>> > i configure a class path >>> > export CLASSPATH=.:$JAVA_HOME >>> > >>> > i got this erro in shell >>> > >>> > root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar >>> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >>> > org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration >>> > at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) >>> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>> > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration >>> > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) >>> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >>> > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) >>> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) >>> > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) >>> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) >>> > ... 1 more >>> > >>> > >>> > What is the problem? >>> > >>> > thanks >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Harsh J >>> www.harshj.com >>> >> >> > --0016e6daa8a596d183049aaf96e3-- From general-return-2880-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 25 20:54:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55413 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 20:54:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 20:54:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8809 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 20:54:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7514 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 20:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7457 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 20:54:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:54:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.115.60] (HELO h1349259.stratoserver.net) (85.214.115.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:54:31 +0000 Received: from isabel-drost.de ([85.214.115.60] helo=motokokusanagi.localnet) by h1349259.stratoserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Phptu-0001Ql-CV; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:54:07 +0000 From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: user@mahout.apache.org Subject: CFP - Berlin Buzzwords 2011 - Search, Score, Scale Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:53:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: general@lucene.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, user@hbase.apache.org, solr-user@lucene.apache.org, java-user@lucene.apache.org, user@nutch.apache.org X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2073183.1OyNNgtYSL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101252153.30628.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart2073183.1OyNNgtYSL Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_KhzPNKWdhpyvYFX" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Boundary-01=_KhzPNKWdhpyvYFX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is to announce the Berlin Buzzwords 2011. The second edition of the=20 successful conference on scalable and open search, data processing and data= =20 storage in Germany, taking place in Berlin. Call for Presentations Berlin Buzzwords http://berlinbuzzwords.de Berlin Buzzwords 2011 - Search, Store, Scale 6/7 June 2011 The event will comprise presentations on scalable data processing. We invit= e you=20 to submit talks on the topics: * IR / Search - Lucene, Solr, katta or comparable solutions * NoSQL - like CouchDB, MongoDB, Jackrabbit, HBase and others * Hadoop - Hadoop itself, MapReduce, Cascading or Pig and relatives * Closely related topics not explicitly listed above are welcome. We are looking for presentations on the implementation of the systems themsel= ves, real world applications and case studies. Important Dates (all dates in GMT +2) * Submission deadline: March 1st 2011, 23:59 MEZ * Notification of accepted speakers: March 22th, 2011, MEZ. * Publication of final schedule: April 5th, 2011. * Conference: June 6/7. 2011 High quality, technical submissions are called for, ranging from principles= to=20 practice. We are looking for real world use cases, background on the=20 architecture of specific projects and a deep dive into architectures built = on=20 top of e.g. Hadoop clusters. Proposals should be submitted at http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/cfp-0 no= =20 later than March 1st, 2011. Acceptance notifications will be sent out soon = after=20 the submission deadline. Please include your name, bio and email, the title= of=20 the talk, a brief abstract in English language. Please indicate whether you= want=20 to give a lightning (10min), short (20min) or long (40min) presentation and= =20 indicate the level of experience with the topic your audience should have (= e.g.=20 whether your talk will be suitable for newbies or is targeted for experienc= ed=20 users.) If you'd like to pitch your brand new product in your talk, please = let=20 us know as well - there will be extra space for presenting new ideas, aweso= me=20 products and great new projects. The presentation format is short. We will be enforcing the schedule rigorou= sly. If you are interested in sponsoring the event (e.g. we would be happy to pr= ovide=20 videos after the event, free drinks for attendees as well as an after-show= =20 party), please contact us. =46ollow @hadoopberlin on Twitter for updates. Tickets, news on the confere= nce,=20 and the final schedule are be published at http://berlinbuzzwords.de. Program Chairs: Isabel Drost, Jan Lehnardt, and Simon Willnauer. Please re-distribute this CfP to people who might be interested. If you are local and wish to meet us earlier, please note that this Thursda= y=20 evening there will be an Apache Hadoop Get Together (videos kindly sponsore= d by=20 Cloudera, venue kindly provided for free by Zanox) featuring talks on Apach= e=20 Hadoop in production as well as news on current Apache Lucene developments. Contact us at: newthinking communications=20 GmbH Sch=F6nhauser Allee 6/7=20 10119 Berlin,=20 Germany=20 Julia Gem=E4hlich Isabel Drost=20 +49(0)30-9210 596 --Boundary-01=_KhzPNKWdhpyvYFX Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is to announce the Berlin Buzzw= ords 2011. The second edition of the successful conference on scalable and = open search, data processing and data storage in Germany, taking place in B= erlin.


Call for P= resentations Berlin Buzzwords

http://be= rlinbuzzwords.de

Berlin Buzzwords 2= 011 - Search, Store, Scale

6/7 = June 2011

The event will comprise presentation= s on scalable data processing. We invite you to submit talks on the topics:=

* IR / Search - Lucene, Solr, kat= ta or comparable solutions

* NoSQL - like CouchDB, MongoDB, = Jackrabbit, HBase and others

* Hadoop - Hadoop itself, MapRedu= ce, Cascading or Pig and relatives

* Closely related topics not expl= icitly listed above are welcome. We are

looking for presentations on th= e implementation of the systems themselves,

real world applications and cas= e studies.


Important Dates (all dates in = GMT +2)

* Submission deadline: March 1st = 2011, 23:59 MEZ

* Notification of accepted speake= rs: March 22th, 2011, MEZ.

* Publication of final schedule: = April 5th, 2011.

* Conference: June 6/7. 2011

High quality, technical submissions = are called for, ranging from principles to practice. We are looking for rea= l world use cases, background on the architecture of specific projects and = a deep dive into architectures built on top of e.g. Hadoop clusters.=


Proposals should be submitted = at http://berlinbuzzwords.de/content/cfp-0 no later than March 1st, 2011. A= cceptance notifications will be sent out soon after the submission deadline= =2E Please include your name, bio and email, the title of the talk, a brief= abstract in English language. Please indicate whether you want to give a l= ightning (10min), short (20min) or long (40min) presentation and indicate t= he level of experience with the topic your audience should have (e.g. wheth= er your talk will be suitable for newbies or is targeted for experienced us= ers.) If you'd like to pitch your brand new product in your talk, please le= t us know as well - there will be extra space for presenting new ideas, awe= some products and great new projects.


The presentation format is sho= rt. We will be enforcing the schedule rigorously.


If you are interested in spons= oring the event (e.g. we would be happy to provide videos after the event, = free drinks for attendees as well as an after-show party), please contact u= s.


Follow @hadoopberlin on Twitte= r for updates. Tickets, news on the conference, and the final schedule are = be published at http://berlinbuzzwords.de.


Program Chairs: Isabel Drost, = Jan Lehnardt, and Simon Willnauer.

Please re-distribute this CfP to peo= ple who might be interested.

If you are local and wish to meet us earlier, please n= ote that this Thursday evening there will be an Apache Hadoop Get Together = (videos kindly sponsored by Cloudera, venue kindly provided for free by Zan= ox) featuring talks on Apache Hadoop in production as well as news on curre= nt Apache Lucene developments.


Contact us at:


newthinking communications

GmbH Sch=F6nhauser Allee 6/7 =

10119 Berlin,

Germany

Julia Gem=E4hlich

Isabel Drost

+49(0)30-9210 596

<= /html> --Boundary-01=_KhzPNKWdhpyvYFX-- --nextPart2073183.1OyNNgtYSL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk0/OEoACgkQPJpCBAwIhbRqCwCfS6MZ0C/CgOnz8zcSaVRix3/A nIMAmQH/1wVnJbGAJ/Lvu07DqoUxFyvq =je5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2073183.1OyNNgtYSL-- From general-return-2881-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 26 03:50:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49809 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 03:50:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 03:50:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 45512 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 03:50:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45273 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 03:50:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45265 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 03:50:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:50:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:50:24 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so520370wwd.29 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MsZs3fNpcTLI91Jmzs45bFrFPSRR41ayUitUOVZHpeE=; b=jTfivHouTX8dEbjQ7uadeAYzKVuNXOvCvoaiBpZxDaI9csyPiDMxFzxlyOZff17ykO kIuBjZ6kvjE9+MYAPeqdOTmvKaZ+hyLAoV7+KQbWDfRsDCSslcVWJCr4LachkO1U3cDU KKmvdxJODfzqv6mR2mt4jGjKEUBxYt9VM63dk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=XxGI6lK/cjLSiGhbrkSC450S5b/wsmtbNkb2ZHbZVcDqEFb8PhE8PoEliYGpOVdtqL SRKsU9h7IJayTXi0iZZ7lCqU8b802PwaE0MD2UbIo3dOZ6BVquogR9s5BEdVKbq+uI/M K18gyweMcpuZP1tGn7QeuBRbzM5ZU/VjofN9Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.143.2 with SMTP id k2mr659892wej.66.1296013803704; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: vermaabhishekp@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.246.68 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:50:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:50:03 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qd0sbrKBqPopUBScBjHXiU6OqCE Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop job logs for research From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6deddc864d12f049ab7ba22 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6deddc864d12f049ab7ba22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi fellow Hadoop users and developers, I am a third year PhD student at the University of Illinois and am working on improving workload management and scheduling in Hadoop. I have tested some of my ideas on synthetic workloads, GridMix, hadoop-examples and a few of my own applications. I am looking for real workloads that are executed in the industry. Specifically, I am interested in the job logs (stored by default on the JobTracker) of real workloads. If people are concerned about the confidentiality of the application, I would like to mention that these logs contain very little information about the processed data or the application itself. Anonymizing the job names (and their submission times, etc.) would not be too much of a problem. I would love to collaborate with folks from the industry in understanding these workloads. I sincerely hope that the research that I am conducting will benefit everybody. Thanks a lot. -Abhishek. --0016e6deddc864d12f049ab7ba22-- From general-return-2882-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 26 07:21:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41853 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 07:21:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 07:21:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 56138 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 07:21:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55788 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 07:21:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55777 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 07:21:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:21:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:21:04 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_y2Da1pZ/IPAr4ktkxAgzUg)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LFM009CECC3WTE0@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:19:16 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-26_04:2011-01-26,2011-01-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1101250263 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:19:14 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Boundary_(ID_y2Da1pZ/IPAr4ktkxAgzUg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Started another trial run of MR precommit testing: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/17/ Let's see if 17th time is a charm... Nige On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Hrm, the MR precommit test I'm running has hung (been running for 14 hours >> so far). FWIW, 2 HDFS precommit tests are hung too. I suspect it could be >> the NFS mounts on the machines. I forced a thread dump which you can see in >> the console: >> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/10/console >> >> > Strange, haven't seen a hang like that before in handleConnectionFailure. It > should retry for 15 minutes max in that loop. > > >> Any other ideas why these might be hanging? >> >> > There is an HDFS bug right now that can cause hangs on some tests - > HDFS-1529 - would appreciate if someone can take a look. But I don't think > this is responsible for the MR hang above. > > -Todd > > >> On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be >>>> fixed quickly. Let me know. >>>> >>>> >>> No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which >> fixes >>> this test timeout for me. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Todd, would love to get >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first >> since >>>>>> this is failing every night on trunk. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then >>>>> enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's >>>>> something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold >> off >>>>> the useful testing for all the other patches. >>>>> >>>>> -Todd >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Nigel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other >>>> particular >>>>>>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets >>>>>>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the >>>> test-patch >>>>>>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> -Todd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on >>>> the >>>>>> ~30 >>>>>>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I >> can >>>>>>>>> haz snooty robot butler? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < >> cos@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >>>>>>>>>> unless it is done earlier. >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants >>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> whip one up tonight. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done >> I'll >>>>>>>> enable hdfs patch testing. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is >> turned >>>> on >>>>>>>> HDFS is >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < >>>> cos@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch >>>> will >>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a >>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but >>>>>>>> messier >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better >>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. >> The >>>> -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually >>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson >> does >>>> so >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < >>>>>>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>> jghoman@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, >> saving >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests >>>> are >>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again >>>> for >>>>>>>> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from >>>>>>>> entering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>>>>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests >> would >>>>>> need >>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if >>>> Hudson >>>>>>>> could list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But >>>>>> that's >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the >>>>>> tests >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are >> a >>>>>> lot >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple >>>>>>>> patches. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, >> will >>>>>>>> decrease >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we >> won't >>>>>>>> turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks >> like >>>>>> both >>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is >> there >>>> a >>>>>>>> reason to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is >>>>>> invaluable >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch >>>>>>>> themselves. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there >>>>>> were >>>>>>>> known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more >> failing >>>>>>>> tests now is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I >>>>>>>> know). This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing >> tests >>>>>>>> involve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. >>>>>>>> Currently, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS >> issues >>>>>>>> that are in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting >> these >>>>>>>> tests fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed >>>> (applies >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >> > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera --Boundary_(ID_y2Da1pZ/IPAr4ktkxAgzUg)-- From general-return-2883-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 26 11:24:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44991 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 11:24:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27294 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 11:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26940 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 11:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26932 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 11:24:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:24:31 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so794063wwd.29 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:24:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7mGG/tmlElPU2xhxDl/gTRf2UMu16j4OBbreLNSRVok=; b=CEZcTviCUoYY4/lm1ZF0lpyNTqoM4tOodwxJSe2epp1glGRD9DYYk3PcgriJiJh8+n 0vK2TAuPHEIrXCBu0XokKcPE3dH4HFFl46iweFv4RMQV5y8tCWcrH3yH1O3CbtrtViyV uMynARPRre/975DossO+U4rqoU6fYDykoxVmU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mPtFNFuwZR/bbK8nen0nAp/8UcU2QtB5JMueqlM2XlxSVZj9wIeuxiOiijSnnuINQp PVGSyFOix1ARMeWm5HpiVLKr/YeR9aaoqhKqdNeKKCVUnkE6ChO5yI33pBP+tZbQpPqI WYIU/6zvDqSR5E8rZnCjPNqCjelZ2nCJ3AboA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.59.193 with SMTP id s43mr4925008wec.42.1296041050031; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:24:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:24:10 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop datanote question From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0d74066c86b049abe12a7 --000e0ce0d74066c86b049abe12a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello.. I'm confused about the architecture of HDFS I have a client java write a files on a master node. It=B4s work perfect!.. well i see a HDFS architecture http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/images/hdfsarchitecture.gif some client access a data note.. i try use my java client write direct on slave node. I change IP on client configuration: Configuration conf =3D new Configuration(); conf.set("fs.default.name","hdfs://192.168.254.25:54310/"); //slave ip I got this error. . 26/01/2011 09:19:52 org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection handleConnectionFailure It dont work .. In architecture picture show me that all datanode can conectable. That=B4s correct ? How it work ? I can only conect to write on HDFS on master node ?? thank s --000e0ce0d74066c86b049abe12a7-- From general-return-2884-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 26 18:06:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33179 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 18:06:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 18:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 54711 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 18:06:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54273 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 18:06:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54265 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 18:06:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:06:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.96 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.96] (HELO asmtpout021.mac.com) (17.148.16.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:06:21 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_HEiLJUPsR4bQt8nzfCXyqQ)" Received: from [10.0.1.13] ([71.198.192.174]) by asmtp021.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LFN00IMP69JC9I0@asmtp021.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:05:45 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-26_08:2011-01-26,2011-01-26,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1101260111 Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. From: Nigel Daley Subject: Re: Patch testing Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:05:42 -0800 In-reply-to: To: general@hadoop.apache.org References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> Message-id: <804715D0-C9D4-41F4-B209-4A022053DEBD@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_HEiLJUPsR4bQt8nzfCXyqQ) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT raid (contrib) test hanging: TestBlockFixer I forced 2 thread dumps. Both hung in the same place. Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2283 This is a blocker for turning on MR precommit. Cheers, Nige On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Started another trial run of MR precommit testing: > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/17/ > > Let's see if 17th time is a charm... > > Nige > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> Hrm, the MR precommit test I'm running has hung (been running for 14 hours >>> so far). FWIW, 2 HDFS precommit tests are hung too. I suspect it could be >>> the NFS mounts on the machines. I forced a thread dump which you can see in >>> the console: >>> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/10/console >>> >>> >> Strange, haven't seen a hang like that before in handleConnectionFailure. It >> should retry for 15 minutes max in that loop. >> >> >>> Any other ideas why these might be hanging? >>> >>> >> There is an HDFS bug right now that can cause hangs on some tests - >> HDFS-1529 - would appreciate if someone can take a look. But I don't think >> this is responsible for the MR hang above. >> >> -Todd >> >> >>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can be >>>>> fixed quickly. Let me know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which >>> fixes >>>> this test timeout for me. >>>> >>>> -Todd >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Todd, would love to get >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first >>> since >>>>>>> this is failing every night on trunk. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and then >>>>>> enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if it's >>>>>> something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should hold >>> off >>>>>> the useful testing for all the other patches. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Todd >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Nigel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other >>>>> particular >>>>>>>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue gets >>>>>>>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the >>>>> test-patch >>>>>>>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> -Todd >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly on >>>>> the >>>>>>> ~30 >>>>>>>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I >>> can >>>>>>>>>> haz snooty robot butler? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < >>> cos@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I think, >>>>>>>>>>> unless it is done earlier. >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone wants >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> whip one up tonight. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done >>> I'll >>>>>>>>> enable hdfs patch testing. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is >>> turned >>>>> on >>>>>>>>> HDFS is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < >>>>> cos@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every patch >>>>> will >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make a >>>>>>>>> comment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, but >>>>>>>>> messier >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a better >>>>> way. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. >>> The >>>>> -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually >>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson >>> does >>>>> so >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < >>>>>>>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>>> jghoman@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, >>> saving >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed tests >>>>> are >>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch again >>>>> for >>>>>>>>> HDFS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests from >>>>>>>>> entering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < >>>>>>>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests >>> would >>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if >>>>> Hudson >>>>>>>>> could list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). But >>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs the >>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there are >>> a >>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling multiple >>>>>>>>> patches. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, >>> will >>>>>>>>> decrease >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we >>> won't >>>>>>>>> turn it on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks >>> like >>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is >>> there >>>>> a >>>>>>>>> reason to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is >>>>>>> invaluable >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch >>>>>>>>> themselves. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and there >>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more >>> failing >>>>>>>>> tests now is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great excuse I >>>>>>>>> know). This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing >>> tests >>>>>>>>> involve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even longer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need investigation. >>>>>>>>> Currently, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS >>> issues >>>>>>>>> that are in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting >>> these >>>>>>>>> tests fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed >>>>> (applies >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> HDFS as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Todd Lipcon >>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Todd Lipcon >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > --Boundary_(ID_HEiLJUPsR4bQt8nzfCXyqQ)-- From general-return-2885-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 26 18:33:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48912 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 18:33:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 18:33:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 3991 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 18:33:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3907 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 18:33:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3899 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 18:33:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:33:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:33:01 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so702782iyb.35 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.34.9 with SMTP id j9mr8537274ibd.137.1296066760264; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.19 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <804715D0-C9D4-41F4-B209-4A022053DEBD@mac.com> References: <20101020195420.GG2075@tp> <53F363B9-E865-4E63-907A-7F341A246235@yahoo-inc.com> <4D646D78-621B-4C50-9420-6B5EC7F49B54@mac.com> <7B1CE23C-E15A-4BA5-8D96-62163A56E23C@mac.com> <4CE46119.2030509@yahoo-inc.com> <8617BECB-78B4-42B6-B592-D7FC1F8DA923@mac.com> <4CE47C88.5050203@yahoo-inc.com> <41FB0800-3703-49C1-8069-DEB74FFE6FAC@mac.com> <7B140F50-27E0-47C7-8EF8-B897D26CEE49@mac.com> <394BBDCC-9561-4E07-8EBA-AE3A92814E5A@mac.com> <804715D0-C9D4-41F4-B209-4A022053DEBD@mac.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:32:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Patch testing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221534c927d9cce9049ac40e7f --00221534c927d9cce9049ac40e7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > raid (contrib) test hanging: TestBlockFixer > > I forced 2 thread dumps. Both hung in the same place. Filed > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2283 This is a blocker > for turning on MR precommit. > Since this is contrib, I'd like to suggest just disabling this test temporarily. We can re-enable it once it's fixed. Not having MR pre-commit working has been pretty painful. -Todd > On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > > Started another trial run of MR precommit testing: > > > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/17/ > > > > Let's see if 17th time is a charm... > > > > Nige > > > > On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> > >>> Hrm, the MR precommit test I'm running has hung (been running for 14 > hours > >>> so far). FWIW, 2 HDFS precommit tests are hung too. I suspect it > could be > >>> the NFS mounts on the machines. I forced a thread dump which you can > see in > >>> the console: > >>> > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build/10/console > >>> > >>> > >> Strange, haven't seen a hang like that before in > handleConnectionFailure. It > >> should retry for 15 minutes max in that loop. > >> > >> > >>> Any other ideas why these might be hanging? > >>> > >>> > >> There is an HDFS bug right now that can cause hangs on some tests - > >> HDFS-1529 - would appreciate if someone can take a look. But I don't > think > >> this is responsible for the MR hang above. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Thanks for looking into it Todd. Let's first see if you think it can > be > >>>>> fixed quickly. Let me know. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> No problem, it wasn't too bad after all. Patch up on HADOOP-7087 which > >>> fixes > >>>> this test timeout for me. > >>>> > >>>> -Todd > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Todd, would love to get > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2121 fixed first > >>> since > >>>>>>> this is failing every night on trunk. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What if we disable that test, move that issue to 0.22 blocker, and > then > >>>>>> enable the test-patch? I'll also look into that one today, but if > it's > >>>>>> something that will take a while to fix, I don't think we should > hold > >>> off > >>>>>> the useful testing for all the other patches. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Todd > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Nigel, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> MAPREDUCE-2172 has been fixed for a while. Are there any other > >>>>> particular > >>>>>>>> JIRAs you think need to be fixed before the MR test-patch queue > gets > >>>>>>>> enabled? I have a lot of outstanding patches and doing all the > >>>>> test-patch > >>>>>>>> turnaround manually on 3 different boxes is a real headache. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> -Todd > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Nigel Daley > wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ok, HDFS is now enabled. You'll see a stream of updates shortly > on > >>>>> the > >>>>>>> ~30 > >>>>>>>>> Patch Available HDFS issues. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I committed HDFS-1511 this morning. We should be good to go. I > >>> can > >>>>>>>>>> haz snooty robot butler? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < > >>> cos@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jacob. I am wasted already but I can do it on Sun, I > think, > >>>>>>>>>>> unless it is done earlier. > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 19:41, Jakob Homan > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. I'll get a patch out for 1511 tomorrow, unless someone > wants > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> whip one up tonight. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nigel Daley > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Cos on fixing HDFS-1511 first. Once that is done > >>> I'll > >>>>>>>>> enable hdfs patch testing. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone4 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Konstantin Boudnik < > cos@apache.org > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> One more issue needs to be addressed before test-patch is > >>> turned > >>>>> on > >>>>>>>>> HDFS is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1511 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:17, Konstantin Boudnik < > >>>>> cos@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Considering that because of these 4 faulty cases every > patch > >>>>> will > >>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1'ed a patch author will still have to look at it and make > a > >>>>>>>>> comment > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why this particular -1 isn't valid. Lesser work, perhaps, > but > >>>>>>>>> messier > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. I'm not blocking it - I just feel like there's a > better > >>>>> way. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take care, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:55, Jakob Homan < > jghoman@gmail.com > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If HDFS is added to the test-patch queue right now we get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing but dozens of -1'ed patches. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't dozens of patches being submitted currently. > >>> The > >>>>> -1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't the important thing, it's the grunt work of actually > >>>>>>> running > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and waiting) for the tests, test-patch, etc. that Hudson > >>> does > >>>>> so > >>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the developer doesn't have to. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Dhruba Borthakur < > >>>>>>>>> dhruba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks for doing this. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jakob Homan < > >>>>> jghoman@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, with test-patch updated to show the failing tests, > >>> saving > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers the need to go and verify that the failed > tests > >>>>> are > >>>>>>>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known, how do people feel about turning on test-patch > again > >>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> HDFS > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mapred? I think it'll help prevent any more tests > from > >>>>>>>>> entering > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "yeah, we know" category. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jakob Homan < > >>>>>>>>> jhoman@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True, each patch would get a -1 and the failing tests > >>> would > >>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>> to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified as those known bad (BTW, it would be great if > >>>>> Hudson > >>>>>>>>> could list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which tests failed in the message it posts to JIRA). > But > >>>>>>> that's > >>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit less error-prone work than if the developer runs > the > >>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-patch themselves. Also, with 22 being cut, there > are > >>> a > >>>>>>> lot > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up in the air and several developers are juggling > multiple > >>>>>>>>> patches. The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more automation we can have, even if it's not perfect, > >>> will > >>>>>>>>> decrease > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we may make. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -jg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nigel Daley wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS but we > >>> won't > >>>>>>>>> turn it on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until these projects build and test cleanly. Looks > >>> like > >>>>>>> both > >>>>>>>>> these > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently have test failures. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assuming the projects are compiling and building, is > >>> there > >>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> reason to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not turn it on despite the test failures? Hudson is > >>>>>>> invaluable > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who then don't have to run the tests and test-patch > >>>>>>>>> themselves. We > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turn Hudson off when it was working previously and > there > >>>>>>> were > >>>>>>>>> known > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures. I think one of the reasons we have more > >>> failing > >>>>>>>>> tests now is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher cost of doing Hudson's work (not a great > excuse I > >>>>>>>>> know). This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly true now because several of the failing > >>> tests > >>>>>>>>> involve > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timing out, making the whole testing regime even > longer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every single patch would get a -1 and need > investigation. > >>>>>>>>> Currently, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be about 83 investigations between MR and HDFS > >>> issues > >>>>>>>>> that are in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch available state. Shouldn't we focus on getting > >>> these > >>>>>>>>> tests fixed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed/? Also, I need to get MAPREDUCE-2172 fixed > >>>>> (applies > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> HDFS as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well) before I turn this on. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nige > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Todd Lipcon > >>>>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Todd Lipcon > >>>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Todd Lipcon > >>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Todd Lipcon > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00221534c927d9cce9049ac40e7f-- From general-return-2886-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 27 04:12:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72915 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 04:12:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2011 04:12:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 29052 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 04:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28842 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 04:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28818 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2011 04:12:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:12:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:12:35 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0R4BlKk061506 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:11:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1296101507; bh=a++WZ0qqYil5MyAJ3ud4EHF5sKRY1jrOftwwmII9Sx4=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References; b=hypnoGywhXRZvYPQRRK3DQWUmt8iYREXEfLzIbHSoJ4mQhdbbloaMLOwWpg4iXr++ WY5kt128Ufso/Brkyq5IdUWAhMW/flq2wlMi+qfpNV/TpnTcrHtFAe1tba7/DRfI4h 5kwgXrtGqrPGiD8Zucp/nFpdPcPiGPXwKQzVZFJk= Message-Id: <3539CB30-3574-4B3A-A327-D9AAAC36314B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <5101FEE7-4C57-49C7-841C-2A9BC7BE0464@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop Security Release off Yahoo! patchset Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:11:46 -0800 References: <516684F5-0052-4381-805D-760B61DECB16@yahoo-inc.com> <366A9E58-5BD7-497D-9AE1-229959ED4065@apache.org> <18C5C999-4680-4684-BC55-A430C40FD746@yahoo-inc.com> <2A07F1E6-7096-493B-B92E-89938689DD50@yahoo-inc.com> <5CDDF962-5828-459F-87C3-5033EC21E9BF@mac.com> <075308A1-129B-4BF7-8924-C04EC6106D3E@yahoo-inc.com> <4D34A270.1060102@apache.org> <3FEB7C1D-AE89-46BE-ABF2-B595B01E222A@mac.com> <3995AF5C-AA18-475B-9384-A532F1CC5D57@linkedin.com> <2090582B-B586-4F81-A724-6A0C55820BB5@yahoo-inc.com> <704BFF6E-AC1D-4769-8856-BFBD125D4D2C@Holsman.NET> <5101FEE7-4C57-49C7-841C-2A9BC7BE0464@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: > > I don't anticipate votes etc, unless folks do want to try it and do > provide feedback. This is what runs at yahoo at the moment. I hope > people think it is worth trying. > I've put up the bits at http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-0.20.100-rc0/ for interested folks. Please do provide feedback if you try it. thanks, Arun From general-return-2887-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 27 04:52:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78697 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 04:52:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2011 04:52:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 57510 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 04:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57025 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 04:52:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57017 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2011 04:52:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:52:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:52:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 78644 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2011 04:51:44 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username omalley, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:51:44 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2226758bwz.35 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:51:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.141 with SMTP id h13mr1141757bkj.180.1296103901440; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:51:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.100.134 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:51:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:51:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem write on HDFS From: "Owen O'Malley" To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd8942a32c25049accb498 --0016e6dd8942a32c25049accb498 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please direct user questions to common-user@hadoop.apache.org. -- Owen On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > I build a servlet with a hadoop... > i think that tomcat enviroment will be find a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar .. but > a get a same error > > *ype* Exception report > > *message*** > > *description* *The server encountered an internal error () that prevented > it > from fulfilling this request.* > > *exception* > > javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet execution threw an exception > > *root cause* > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.OpenFileSystem(HadoopWriter.java:22) > HadoopWriterLib.HadoopWriter.(HadoopWriter.java:16) > HadoopServletTest.doGet(HadoopServletTest.java:35) > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:621) > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722) > > *note* *The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the Apache > Tomcat/7.0.6 logs.* > > The error can be a problem on my ubuntu server ? > > thanks > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alessandro Binhara >wrote: > > > ..i try > > java -classpath hadoop-core-0.20.1.jar -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar > > > > i got a same error.. > > i will try build a servlet and run on tomcat... > > i try many issues to config a classpath... all fail.. > > > > thanks > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Harsh J > wrote: > > > >> The issue would definitely lie with your CLASSPATH. > >> > >> Ideally, while beginning development using Hadoop 0.20, it is better > >> to use the `hadoop jar` command to launch jars of any kind that > >> require Hadoop libraries; be it MapReduce or not. The command will > >> ensure that all the classpath requirements for Hadoop-side libraries > >> are satisfied, so you don't have to worry. > >> > >> Anyhow, try launching it this way: > >> $ java -classpath hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar -jar HadoopHdfsHello.jar; # > >> This should run just fine. > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alessandro Binhara > >> wrote: > >> > Hello .. > >> > > >> > i solve problem in jar.. > >> > i put a hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar in same jar dir. > >> > > >> > i configure a class path > >> > export CLASSPATH=.:$JAVA_HOME > >> > > >> > i got this erro in shell > >> > > >> > root:~# java -jar HahoopHdfsHello.jar > >> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > >> > org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration > >> > at HadooHdfsHello.main(HadooHdfsHello.java:18) > >> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > >> > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > >> > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) > >> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > >> > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) > >> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > >> > at > sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) > >> > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) > >> > ... 1 more > >> > > >> > > >> > What is the problem? > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Harsh J > >> www.harshj.com > >> > > > > > --0016e6dd8942a32c25049accb498-- From general-return-2888-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 27 05:40:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10455 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2011 05:40:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2011 05:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 9439 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 05:40:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9107 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2011 05:40:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9099 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2011 05:40:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:40:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of li.j2ee@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:39:54 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2248823bwz.35 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:39:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cm5ezs8DhwtuVsmAd3BRkDN5cD27/jFuaqKk+q12blg=; b=Kho0a7zQaspadbELIo1MwMf1JeBGv8e6gzRULW1uGt2E1bsyXGsBWHX95VxM9wsDO+ due9lwWTNPmNnZ62QYg8TM7la/EVrMPpcgAjenjee/5GUVhLqTAF+oV3ftfiF+fM8qdD WdHp70tw+Y0zK3VUMUwNJNdIPz9PQxdR5TCtA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fMNSUelKE2q2z2PuEEKwtjmu9vmW0WsMz13AbOSVdaWjLj/DjkZ2kk0Zsg9TlOGdrY OTVgl7WduwuuQn07kz8rCHAJjrvFXRoKtG8YVZAarJ8bKkYbPyTp4bZlyn0S+KQf2wQh v6yEEpJGJOjQf1vtQrnySMhQN8JMePbo7pWcs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.76.18 with SMTP id a18mr1196139bkk.9.1296106772272; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:39:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.16.146 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:39:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:39:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop datanote question From: li ping To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f46e5ac0982c049acd5f3b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f46e5ac0982c049acd5f3b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think you must misunderstanding the architecture. I believe the "master node" that you talk about is actually a NameNode, the client must talk with NameNode. the namenode will check if the file that yo= u try to write existed or not. if the file doesn't exist, NN will create a record in NN and return a DFSOutputSteam. the data will be writed in this OutputStream. The DFSOutputStream will handle which datanode the data will be writed to. So, the only entry point is the NameNode. you can not connect to the other node to write the file. On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alessandro Binhara wrot= e: > Hello.. > > I'm confused about the architecture of HDFS > I have a client java write a files on a master node. It=C2=B4s work perfe= ct!.. > well i see a HDFS architecture > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/images/hdfsarchitecture.gif > some client access a data note.. > > i try use my java client write direct on slave node. I change IP on clien= t > configuration: > Configuration conf =3D new Configuration(); > conf.set("fs.default.name","hdfs://192.168.254.25:54310/"); //slave ip > > I got this error. . > 26/01/2011 09:19:52 org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection > handleConnectionFailure > It dont work .. > > In architecture picture show me that all datanode can conectable. That=C2= =B4s > correct ? > > How it work ? > I can only conect to write on HDFS on master node ?? > > thank s > --=20 -----=E6=9D=8E=E5=B9=B3 --001485f46e5ac0982c049acd5f3b-- From general-return-2889-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 28 21:49:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65054 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2011 21:49:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2011 21:49:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 48192 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 21:49:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48109 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 21:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48101 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2011 21:49:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:49:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jcoveney@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:49:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4077599bwz.35 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:48:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rmRYEuMBVlxqnj+Q/Nqz/B1o5TEH/t75PNC9udT6qis=; b=XWHztKNxsQ3JWnB8lxpnkPdpoDc7bfOZN0W0r286b2MMkO/5VRnHUxd03LxbRYHxME uSqnmXrPUCSM3t7Xlz3zO19mGOtUeN4BRNNHn+QgYIroibRXcSQXJOLM4fvAYC3CaD1f KpNhkWVBZn4gbDGqDyJmmnPMxYddn2OOWyF80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YOqjVagyp2Dfwgmwec9xauiulTZn96qr7ZoOyTMvDnJqZdtICi+hDFySPiWL11j5j4 yb3WpE70aZm4BInV0Mc0PKP8FJYtPtR5xDF1zB0pJ8wUlAs00PwEQu0M8500HdPYYw08 +vqmDhj1rG3Qhpr7YvssAyXiQweELpfv2hNT8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.85.84 with SMTP id n20mr2905780bkl.210.1296251326042; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.16.135 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:48:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:48:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Dump question about initializing log4j... From: Jonathan Coveney To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab4fdd41441049aef07a7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6dab4fdd41441049aef07a7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am trying to run hadoop in standalone mode (mainly to get it working with pig). I get this error: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. Looking around, I haven't been able to find a straightforward "this is what you need to do," and I know very little about these things. I'd be very thankful if someone could enlighten me... Thank you Jon --0016e6dab4fdd41441049aef07a7-- From general-return-2890-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jan 30 23:26:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1826 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2011 23:26:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2011 23:26:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 63020 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2011 23:26:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62878 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2011 23:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62870 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2011 23:26:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:26:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:26:33 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so4881513iyb.35 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:26:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.220.67 with SMTP id hx3mr7018507icb.350.1296429970953; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.220.70 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:26:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:26:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: MRUnit From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30549ef7e51554049b189f2a --20cf30549ef7e51554049b189f2a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All: I've created a fork of mrunit from Hadoop's contrib directory at https://github.com/esammer/mrunit Why: * MRUnit could benefit from a separate development and release cycle than that of Hadoop itself. This would allow MRUnit to evolve independently of Hadoop. * Moving projects out of contrib simplify Hadoop's build and the artifacts that need to be maintained. * I've heard rumblings that contrib is generally frowned upon by some of the committers. I agree. What is already done: * Build system ported to Maven. * No more build warnings re: generics or deprecation. I think it makes sense to remove mrunit from contrib (after a deprecation period) but I'm curious to hear others' opinions. If the community at large decides it makes sense to retain mrunit in contrib I'm happy to provide contributions back. I'd also like to offer commit status on the fork to any current Hadoop committers who are interested. The project is being hosted on Github to ease collaboration. Pull requests are greatly appreciated. Regards. -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --20cf30549ef7e51554049b189f2a-- From general-return-2891-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 02:50:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83413 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 02:50:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 02:50:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81357 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 02:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81043 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 02:50:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81035 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 02:50:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:50:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:50:49 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so5539781iwn.35 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:50:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.176.68 with SMTP id bd4mr7159342icb.408.1296442228247; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:50:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.173.7 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:50:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:50:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MRUnit From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8ef07c8cca049b1b7a03 --90e6ba6e8ef07c8cca049b1b7a03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I think it makes sense to remove mrunit from contrib (after a > deprecation period) but I'm curious to hear others' opinions. Oh please do take things out of contrib. I'd love to see all of it move to Github. Thanks for putting in the time for MRUnit. --90e6ba6e8ef07c8cca049b1b7a03-- From general-return-2892-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 03:43:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4898 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 03:43:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 03:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 03:43:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1743 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 03:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1715 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 03:42:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:42:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.100 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.100] (HELO asmtpout025.mac.com) (17.148.16.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:42:47 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_AxP92tquXRHGlvdMq3akGg)" Received: from [172.20.1.124] ([173.164.176.117]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LFV0034LBMPVD70@asmtp025.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:42:26 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-30_08:2011-01-28,2011-01-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1101300159 From: Nigel Daley Subject: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:42:25 -0800 Message-id: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Boundary_(ID_AxP92tquXRHGlvdMq3akGg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Folks, Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). Common Contrib: failmon hod test MapReduce Contrib: capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? data_join dynamic-scheduler eclipse-plugin fairscheduler -- move to MR core? gridmix index mrunit mumak raid sqoop streaming -- move to MR core? vaidya vertica HDFS Contrib: fuse-dfs hdfsproxy thriftfs Cheers, Nige --Boundary_(ID_AxP92tquXRHGlvdMq3akGg)-- From general-return-2893-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 04:00:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13403 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 04:00:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 04:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 18161 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 04:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17536 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 04:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17527 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 04:00:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.95 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.95] (HELO asmtpout020.mac.com) (17.148.16.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:00:24 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [172.20.1.124] ([173.164.176.117]) by asmtp020.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LFV00H1GCFROV50@asmtp020.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:59:52 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-30_08:2011-01-28,2011-01-30,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1101300160 Subject: Re: MRUnit From: Nigel Daley In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:59:51 -0800 Message-id: <5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com> References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) +1. I just started a thread on moving all components out of contrib. nige On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> >> I think it makes sense to remove mrunit from contrib (after a >> deprecation period) but I'm curious to hear others' opinions. > > > Oh please do take things out of contrib. I'd love to see all of it move to > Github. Thanks for putting in the time for MRUnit. From general-return-2894-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 04:23:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27479 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 04:23:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 04:23:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 44368 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 04:23:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43869 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 04:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43861 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 04:22:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:22:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of esammer@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:22:53 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so5052025iyb.35 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:22:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.222.9 with SMTP id ie9mr7247496icb.417.1296447752128; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.220.70 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:22:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:22:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a033bc47ee049b1cc36b --20cf3054a033bc47ee049b1cc36b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Huge +1. Sqoop has continued development at https://github.com/cloudera/sqoop MRUnit is at https://github.com/esammer/mrunit I think the former can be easily removed. The latter, per my previous email, I think could be removed as well. On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched ( > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) > I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, > mapreduce, and hdfs. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that > nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long > release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib > components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted > elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural > *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some > should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project > they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping > of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > failmon > hod > test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > data_join > dynamic-scheduler > eclipse-plugin > fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > gridmix > index > mrunit > mumak > raid > sqoop > streaming -- move to MR core? > vaidya > vertica > > > HDFS Contrib: > fuse-dfs > hdfsproxy > thriftfs > > > Cheers, > Nige > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --20cf3054a033bc47ee049b1cc36b-- From general-return-2895-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 05:25:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52374 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 05:25:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 05:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 81899 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 05:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81564 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 05:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81556 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 05:25:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:25:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:25:15 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5379400wye.35 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:24:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.163.203 with SMTP id a53mr5314220wel.104.1296451494365; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:24:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:24:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:24:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org While this seems to be a very good and long awaited advancement (btw thanks to Eric Sammer for making a first project on the move out of MRUnit!) I have a concern about lack of Git support on http://apache-extras.org. I am sure that hosting decision was deeply considered by Apache board (or the whole Apache community) however SVN/Mercurial seems like a real drag for most of Hadoop developers. Basically, if contribs are moved to apache-extras.org then we are likely to face the same situation as with the core Hadoop: lotta development is done in personal Git repos forked from a Git/SVN mirror and then is committed back to the man SVN repository creating an extra cycle. Shall we not dictate a location of contrib projects once they are moved of Hadoop? If ppl feel like they are better be served by GitHub perhaps they should have an option to get hosted there? -- =A0 Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 19:42, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/f= oundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start = a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdf= s. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that = nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long re= lease cycles, etc. =A0Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib = components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted = elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *de= fault* location for migrating these contrib projects. =A0Perhaps some shoul= d graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they= 're included in). =A0If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping o= f contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > =A0failmon > =A0hod > =A0test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > =A0capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0data_join > =A0dynamic-scheduler > =A0eclipse-plugin > =A0fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0gridmix > =A0index > =A0mrunit > =A0mumak > =A0raid > =A0sqoop > =A0streaming -- move to MR core? > =A0vaidya > =A0vertica > > > HDFS Contrib: > =A0fuse-dfs > =A0hdfsproxy > =A0thriftfs > > > Cheers, > Nige > From general-return-2896-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 05:38:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67555 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 05:38:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 05:38:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 87375 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 05:38:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86939 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 05:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86924 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 05:38:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:38:23 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas01.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.37]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0V5bqaV071764 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (10.72.168.149) by SP2-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (98.137.59.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:37:51 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Eric Baldeschwieler In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:37:48 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1FA5AC45-7586-4F4C-9EF6-7A8F41199E2A@yahoo-inc.com> References: To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) +1 - A really good idea to clean up the builds and ownership issues. I think it is good to have a default location for related projects and = apache-extras.org does seem like a logical place. We should also probably add a prominent wiki section to support use of = apache-extras.org and to provide links to projects that want to host = elsewhere. On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, >=20 > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched = (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_= launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components = out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. =20 >=20 > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures = that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's = long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these = contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop = and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like = a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. = Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to = core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to = come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination = and file a jira. >=20 > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss = any). >=20 > Common Contrib: > failmon > hod > test >=20 >=20 > MapReduce Contrib: > capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > data_join > dynamic-scheduler > eclipse-plugin > fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > gridmix > index > mrunit > mumak > raid > sqoop > streaming -- move to MR core? > vaidya > vertica >=20 >=20 > HDFS Contrib: > fuse-dfs > hdfsproxy > thriftfs >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Nige From general-return-2897-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 06:02:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71853 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 06:02:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 06:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 97607 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 06:02:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97082 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 06:02:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97074 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 06:02:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:02:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:02:47 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so5285139qwe.35 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:02:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.247.68 with SMTP id mb4mr5448590qcb.294.1296453744900; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:02:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:02:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Agree w Eric's comments around defaults and documenting them. How about setting a date where the projects are created on apache extras and removed from contrib unless someone volunteers to maintain them? I agree apache extras should be the default unless the person volunteering to maintain the project wants to host it elsewhere. Btw I think raid should also probably move to core, it's actively worked on= . I'll volunteer to create a project for fuse-dfs. Thanks, Eli On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/f= oundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start = a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdf= s. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that = nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long re= lease cycles, etc. =A0Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib = components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted = elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *de= fault* location for migrating these contrib projects. =A0Perhaps some shoul= d graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they= 're included in). =A0If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping o= f contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > =A0failmon > =A0hod > =A0test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > =A0capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0data_join > =A0dynamic-scheduler > =A0eclipse-plugin > =A0fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > =A0gridmix > =A0index > =A0mrunit > =A0mumak > =A0raid > =A0sqoop > =A0streaming -- move to MR core? > =A0vaidya > =A0vertica > > > HDFS Contrib: > =A0fuse-dfs > =A0hdfsproxy > =A0thriftfs > > > Cheers, > Nige > From general-return-2898-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 07:19:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10687 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 07:19:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 07:19:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 43183 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 07:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42686 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 07:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42678 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 07:19:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:19:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.27.228] (HELO qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:19:39 +0000 Received: from omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 27Jm1g0060b6N64AF7KJo2; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:19:18 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.52] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 27K91g0092VBGtd8P7KCZm; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:19:16 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:19:08 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches > ) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of > common, mapreduce, and hdfs. The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to abandon code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate action some group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on the code from Hadoop. Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to abandon. That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves occasionally. After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: failmon fault injection fuse-dfs hod kfs Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure out which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of Hadoop they installed. -- Owen From general-return-2899-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 08:41:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38128 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 08:41:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 08:41:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13703 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 08:41:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13367 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 08:41:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13359 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 08:41:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:41:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:41:28 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5493420wye.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:41:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C0UZOfMw0kUnVfV4A0kb/EPLM8uQEPBBGPjH2NTAKIY=; b=prTGen80hRwEXeft/gQJd9wWiJ3D1ACabG5PCsanROuE3aVc9A6REgGaNAcs62UZpL FBWI9cw7mvzzapSzhGTuwG26KHBI7gjYXjvW0/QRwiM6Frvovc7p20A7hJ1QXV35qKXN yfYUCwj2hpjji05Ttaoux9UHN8tKFcPw/ujeM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nWBIQJueXj06fR2TAhFZKOBnxolpxZWWjvCRgdQ4X/cpuhtiOHx9NahXvCKXMQAE+w JBDGEZeWz/cVGuk0eIysA/5AVk74FuCGrD58lQOsMkL6jArarENu+dJ9NJdxLkJBK0bE jUmHLr09NY46FndoO0SyUaNy8SsU1a/5zL60w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.183.195 with SMTP id q45mr5504409wem.94.1296463268625; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.159.5 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:41:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:41:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f1e2d4973e23049b206029 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f1e2d4973e23049b206029 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I agree with Owen. If we move code out of the contrib project, then it is more likely to create confusion among users, especially when multiple versions of the code base float around. But I agree that we should purge contrib code that is not being used or not being actively developed. thanks, dhruba On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched ( >> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) >> I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, >> mapreduce, and hdfs. >> > > The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to abandon > code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate action some > group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on the code > from Hadoop. > > Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to abandon. > That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves occasionally. > > After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: > > failmon > fault injection > fuse-dfs > hod > kfs > > Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at > least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of > confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure out > which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of > Hadoop they installed. > > -- Owen > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --001485f1e2d4973e23049b206029-- From general-return-2900-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 11:29:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99436 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 11:29:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 11:29:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 63547 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:29:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63175 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63167 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 11:29:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:29:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of binhara@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:29:10 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5627449wye.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:28:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uhYBnECLuxvU9EH40NnS5uMUQCUsvz0Vlh8p98/dbC8=; b=V0EzbH0dfN83ctbOl6YbgiFg1Mw8CtPqIltVWEYAnBAk9MivqTG+tLAzV0Tzf6yRTD Dx/GhEY8YfteGJYkFctEHinlCGxBcmACa3F5LSGYPcOebACnBCWZ3oM0J4CHPO0/plwL eSLcBgwq4NdRbMMM6Cb5dGuGq7D5CjZZS0Z8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=tRJBjbtXZuMK5eVgaqzdI6rWxu+OXqUYxXl2Ur2nYO/VOt4CDpmANcoa/7Ls4rifsR F1PB23LM1Pubc31Yi6qzx/WIDLEy7wMcvfgGBnNZX5C/g+OB6nug4dElQ2Bna5guwfYd 1EsyntPNKjZj2MpDt/zZwOSsCdoaUqaSE59Ak= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.150.134 with SMTP id z6mr5889501wej.27.1296473328692; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:28:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.17.146 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:28:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:28:48 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Append file is working in on hadoop 0.20 From: Alessandro Binhara To: general@hadoop.apache.org, cdh-user@cloudera.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daa8a537ac17049b22b8d5 --0016e6daa8a537ac17049b22b8d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello ... I need append file in HDFS .. I see many forum on internet talking about problems in HDFS to append files. That=B4s is correct ? Append file is working in on hadoop 0.20 ? thank =B4s --0016e6daa8a537ac17049b22b8d5-- From general-return-2901-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 11:44:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5672 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 11:44:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 11:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 74728 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:44:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74474 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74466 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 11:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:44:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7200BB7D2A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:44:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NAi5mnkuKTxM for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:44:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E64B7D23 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:44:00 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1297079026.78107@kxgWFDbwxWOHjEcQY9XgCQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p0VBhkCZ016252 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:43:46 GMT Message-ID: <4D46A072.4080801@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:43:46 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p0VBhkCZ016252 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 31/01/11 05:24, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Shall we not dictate a location of contrib projects once they are > moved of Hadoop? If ppl feel like they are better be served by GitHub > perhaps they should have an option to get hosted there? -I see discussions about Git at the ASF infra mailing lists -the stuff in contrib is code contributed to apache, should still live there if we can keep it going. Which means people have to step up, or we put it in some attic From general-return-2902-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 11:48:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6411 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 11:48:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 11:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 81838 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81472 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 11:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81464 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 11:48:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:48:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:48:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA2B7D26 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NELvTByMr6Mf for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC121B7D23 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:50 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1297079252.47102@jgPAvKrTM9w+gzdDGad+5Q Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p0VBlWC0016371 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:32 GMT Message-ID: <4D46A154.2070900@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:47:32 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p0VBlWC0016371 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org On 31/01/11 03:42, Nigel Daley wrote: > Folks, > > Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hdfs. > > These contrib components complicate the builds, cause test failures that nobody seems to care about, have releases that are tied to Hadoop's long release cycles, etc. Most folks I've talked with agree that these contrib components would be better served by being pulled out of Hadoop and hosted elsewhere. The new apache-extras code hosting site seems like a natural *default* location for migrating these contrib projects. Perhaps some should graduate from contrib to src (ie from contrib to core of the project they're included in). If folks agree, we'll need to come up with a mapping of contrib component to it's final destination and file a jira. > > Here are the contrib components by project (hopefully I didn't miss any). > > Common Contrib: > failmon > hod > test > > > MapReduce Contrib: > capacity-scheduler -- move to MR core? > data_join > dynamic-scheduler > eclipse-plugin > fairscheduler -- move to MR core? > gridmix > index > mrunit > mumak > raid > sqoop > streaming -- move to MR core? > vaidya > vertica > +1 for the schedulers in core +1 for streaming For the "accessories",they are really separate projects that work on with Hadoop, but could have separate release schedules -move them to incubation, try and staff them. -if they aren't resourced, then that means they are dead code I'm -1 to having any support for filesystems other than Posix and HDFS in there, =0 on S3, but it's used widely enough it should stay in, especially as amazon do apparently provide some funding for testing. Because, as nigel points out, testing is the enemy. If you don't have the implementation of the filesystem in question, there is no way to be sure that some change works, you can't use it, release it saying "it works", or field bug reports. Testing and releasing of filesystem interfaces should be the responsibility of the filesystem suppliers or whoever wants to develop the bridge from the FS to Hadoop. This raises another issue which I've been thinking of recently, how do you define "compatibility". If, for example, my colleagues and I were to stand up say "our FS is compatible with Apache Hadoop", what does that mean? -Steve From general-return-2903-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 13:19:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55132 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 13:19:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 13:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 4466 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 13:19:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3934 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 13:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3926 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 13:19:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:19:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:19:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A249CB7D2F for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fGhKqw63bKVU for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:18:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EC2B7D21 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:18:53 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1297084719.86479@NGoOeQktCJGo5B4Xtk3S2A Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p0VDIb9n019042 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:18:38 GMT Message-ID: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:18:37 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Defining Compatibility Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p0VDIb9n019042 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org what does it mean to be compatible with Hadoop? And how do products that consider themselves compatible with Hadoop say it? We have plugin schedulers and the like, and all is well, and the Apache brand people keep an eye on distributions of the Hadoop code and make sure that Apache Hadoop is cleanly distinguished from redistributions of binaries by third parties. But then you get distributions, and you have to define what is meant in terms of functionality and compatibility Presumably, everyone who issues their own release has either explicitly or implicitly done a lot more testing than is in the unit test suite, testing that exists to stress test the code on large clusters -is there stuff there that needs to be added to SVN to help say a build is of sufficiently quality to be released? Then there are the questions about -things that work with specific versions/releases of Hadoop? -replacement filesystems ? -replacement of core parts of the system, like the MapReduce Engine? IBM have have been talking about "Hadoop on GPFS" http://www.almaden.ibm.com/storagesystems/projects/hadoop/ If this is running the MR layer, should it say "Apache Hadoop MR engine on top of IBM GPFS", or what -and how do you define or assess compatibility at this point? Is it up to the vendor to say "works with Apache Hadoop", and is running the Terasort client code sufficient to say "compatible"? Similarly, if the MapReduce engine gets swapped out, what then? We in HP Labs have been funding some exploratory work at universities in Berlin on an engine that does more operations than just map and reduce, but it will also handle the existing operations with API compatibility on the worker nodes. The goal here is research with an OSS deliverable, but while it may support Hadoop jobs, it's not Hadoop. What to call such things? -Steve From general-return-2904-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 14:04:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67975 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 14:04:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 14:04:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 60791 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 14:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60498 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 14:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60490 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 14:04:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:04:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:04:04 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3066132qyk.14 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:03:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=zDUQ2fzszh6CH1d1qTZI4i3IwHhIK7LRndmP/5Y8jF0=; b=JDmllXaXapV7uVNRUgdaTjs3DTo5s4qVIZ8lgd2Z2Oh7947rKcvV//GbcqpUhoQALp 6t1/QrAKX+DQh+cLbXjavmIU6hx/Z3EjdSDiCpS1xmJ+WRhzG6e6/nrL6qiiFNQOMUZB irBa5Ae44NAZ1KKDcnqqSHsIKL/+Wbv9X/aaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=FwYfetqZEzR1losbfMMOij+17RcpNmltDFRxTlA8415tz9Z4yzA6E16Yldb7SP+U1G T9Th1jozWI4Qao1zrSBo9sMalLwxTE13KlOLDXBx9IkbNnaV2cu34mlGJa63DhQdT3oG L89NVyUlBh+TZZp42yRnW1F2/mQU5WhpQmmig= Received: by 10.224.37.82 with SMTP id w18mr6537644qad.142.1296482594608; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.9] (h-64-236-128-41.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm14809021qcs.40.2011.01.31.06.03.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:03:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Append file is working in on hadoop 0.20 From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:03:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Hi Alessandro. There is a debate among the experts if the 0.20 version of append is = stable, and technically the best way of doing it.=20 Saying that there are lots of people and companies who are using it in = their production clusters with no reported hassles. I suggest you test it out in your own environment to make sure it works = for you.=20 This is something you should be doing anyway.=20 =20 On Jan 31, 2011, at 6:28 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote: > Hello ... >=20 > I need append file in HDFS .. > I see many forum on internet talking about problems in HDFS to append > files. > That=B4s is correct ? >=20 > Append file is working in on hadoop 0.20 ? >=20 > thank =B4s From general-return-2905-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 14:32:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85657 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 14:32:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 14:32:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 2809 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 14:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2608 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 14:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2599 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 14:32:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:32:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:32:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 85568 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 14:32:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:32:11 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6059856iwn.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:32:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.11.130 with SMTP id t2mr382184ibt.49.1296484330597; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.148.82 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:32:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> References: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:32:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Defining Compatibility From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Steve- It's hard to answer without more concrete criteria. Is this a trademark question affecting the marketing of a product? A cross-compatibility taxonomy for users? The minimum criteria to publish a paper/release a product without eye-rolling? The particular compatibility claims made by a system will be nuanced and specific; a runtime that executes MapReduce jobs as they would run in Hadoop can simply make that claim, whether it uses parts of MapReduce, HDFS, or neither. For the various distributions "Powered by Apache Hadoop," one would assume that compatibility will vary depending on the featureset and the audience. A distribution that runs MapReduce applications as-written for Apache Hadoop may be incompatible with a user's deployed metrics/monitoring system. Some random script to scrape the UI may not work. The product may only scale to 20 nodes. Whether these are "compatible with Apache Hadoop" is awkward to answer generally, unless we want to define the semantics of that phrase by policy. To put it bluntly, why would we bother to define such a policy? One could assert that a fully-compatible system would implement all the public/stable APIs as defined in HADOOP-5073, but who would that help? And though interoperability is certainly relevant to systems built on top of Hadoop, is there a reason the Apache project needs to be involved in defining the standards for compatibility among them? Compatibility matters, but I'm not clear on the objective of this discussion. -C On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > what does it mean to be compatible with Hadoop? And how do products that > consider themselves compatible with Hadoop say it? > > We have plugin schedulers and the like, and all is well, and the Apache > brand people keep an eye on distributions of the Hadoop code and make sure > that Apache Hadoop is cleanly distinguished from redistributions of binaries > by third parties. > > But then you get distributions, and you have to define what is meant in > terms of functionality and compatibility > > Presumably, everyone who issues their own release has either explicitly or > implicitly done a lot more testing than is in the unit test suite, testing > that exists to stress test the code on large clusters -is there stuff there > that needs to be added to SVN to help say a build is of sufficiently quality > to be released? > > Then there are the questions about > > -things that work with specific versions/releases of Hadoop? > -replacement filesystems ? > -replacement of core parts of the system, like the MapReduce Engine? > > IBM have have been talking about "Hadoop on GPFS" > http://www.almaden.ibm.com/storagesystems/projects/hadoop/ > > If this is running the MR layer, should it say "Apache Hadoop MR engine on > top of IBM GPFS", or what -and how do you define or assess compatibility at > this point? Is it up to the vendor to say "works with Apache Hadoop", and is > running the Terasort client code sufficient to say "compatible"? > > Similarly, if the MapReduce engine gets swapped out, what then? We in HP > Labs have been funding some exploratory work at universities in Berlin on an > engine that does more operations than just map and reduce, but it will also > handle the existing operations with API compatibility on the worker nodes. > The goal here is research with an OSS deliverable, but while it may support > Hadoop jobs, it's not Hadoop. > > What to call such things? > > > -Steve > > From general-return-2906-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 15:41:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29834 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 15:41:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 15:41:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 21490 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 15:41:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21221 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 15:41:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21061 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 15:41:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:41:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:41:06 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so5774503qwe.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:40:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=15rK05aFowO3CJMEmdtjU45gfuPBPJOhjdidPOmpM0Q=; b=eD0Ue3CkBgaO5KXfABu84Hl5N6EeL08GAdT5GT09WCUC0RLLWa+nW4QuA61jQLa0lY 56m3kMn0xRkftrd6T8eh7L8AznQqPLYQ0dJa7NxVD7O3vxXgdPNU3gXA+clbSJEi6+HV gbYQPmRptS6w/NMpnHDv966A7kUyI6xPSO104= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=holsman.net; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Fv25fxip09ZfE+2GMw5/F2MrtciXbvtSVDVwV1WMdhB/Ruv7VvH3W97L8Mi9BRqSQs EL55SXrrAUVC8w7Of/4wTPyvvpXt2v6VkmhRcGGNf3KKON973p2yLo4LRJ67riISm2eL MEPetZjchShwXOsvJE33m2p9YNMZORVJ7vmwg= Received: by 10.224.29.21 with SMTP id o21mr6579032qac.144.1296488443402; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.180.150.9] (h-64-236-128-41.nat.aol.com [64.236.128.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm14861430qcu.31.2011.01.31.07.40.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:40:42 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Defining Compatibility From: Ian Holsman In-Reply-To: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:40:41 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <290C79C1-117B-4C8C-84EA-3535CE3DA0B6@Holsman.NET> References: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Jan 31, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > what does it mean to be compatible with Hadoop? And how do products = that consider themselves compatible with Hadoop say it? I would like to define it in terms of API's and core functionality. A product (say hive or pig) will run against a set of well defined APIs = for a given version. regardless of who implements the API, it should perform as promised, so = switching between distributions or implementations (say HDFS over GFS) = should not give the end user any surprises. Saying that.. HDFS over GFS may expose a superset of APIs that a tool = may utilize.=20 If the tool requires those APIs it is no longer compatible with Apache = Hadoop, and should not be called such. For example, early versions of HUE required the Thrift API to be = present. So it would clearly not be compatible version Apache Hadoop = 0.20. What still perplexes me is what to do when some core functionality (say = the append patch) that has a identical API to the end-user is promoted = as compatible...=20 I classify this change as a 'end user surprise', *BUT* HDFS over GFS = would also have similar surprises, where the API is the same, but = implemented very differently. So I'm still not sure if you would classify it as being 0.20 compatible. >=20 > We have plugin schedulers and the like, and all is well, and the = Apache brand people keep an eye on distributions of the Hadoop code and = make sure that Apache Hadoop is cleanly distinguished from = redistributions of binaries by third parties. >=20 > But then you get distributions, and you have to define what is meant = in terms of functionality and compatibility >=20 > Presumably, everyone who issues their own release has either = explicitly or implicitly done a lot more testing than is in the unit = test suite, testing that exists to stress test the code on large = clusters -is there stuff there that needs to be added to SVN to help say = a build is of sufficiently quality to be released? >=20 > Then there are the questions about >=20 > -things that work with specific versions/releases of Hadoop? > -replacement filesystems ? > -replacement of core parts of the system, like the MapReduce Engine? >=20 > IBM have have been talking about "Hadoop on GPFS" > http://www.almaden.ibm.com/storagesystems/projects/hadoop/ >=20 > If this is running the MR layer, should it say "Apache Hadoop MR = engine on top of IBM GPFS", or what -and how do you define or assess = compatibility at this point? Is it up to the vendor to say "works with = Apache Hadoop", and is running the Terasort client code sufficient to = say "compatible"? >=20 > Similarly, if the MapReduce engine gets swapped out, what then? We in = HP Labs have been funding some exploratory work at universities in = Berlin on an engine that does more operations than just map and reduce, = but it will also handle the existing operations with API compatibility = on the worker nodes. The goal here is research with an OSS deliverable, = but while it may support Hadoop jobs, it's not Hadoop. >=20 > What to call such things? >=20 >=20 > -Steve >=20 From general-return-2907-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 15:59:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37516 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 15:59:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 15:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60827 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 15:59:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60075 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 15:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59598 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 15:59:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E7C1BA427 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:20 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DQ3VeEtd6wvQ for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580451BA418 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:20 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1297094346.52959@DoMIeDZN5AQM8svjB2bCaA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p0VFx61P023970 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:06 GMT Message-ID: <4D46DC4A.7040700@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:59:06 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Defining Compatibility References: <4D46B6AD.2020802@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p0VFx61P023970 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 31/01/11 14:32, Chris Douglas wrote: > Steve- > > It's hard to answer without more concrete criteria. Is this a > trademark question affecting the marketing of a product? A > cross-compatibility taxonomy for users? The minimum criteria to > publish a paper/release a product without eye-rolling? The particular > compatibility claims made by a system will be nuanced and specific; a > runtime that executes MapReduce jobs as they would run in Hadoop can > simply make that claim, whether it uses parts of MapReduce, HDFS, or > neither. No, I'm thinking more about what large scale tests are needed to be run against the codebase before you can say "it works", and then how to say some changes means that it still works. > > For the various distributions "Powered by Apache Hadoop," one would > assume that compatibility will vary depending on the featureset and > the audience. A distribution that runs MapReduce applications > as-written for Apache Hadoop may be incompatible with a user's > deployed metrics/monitoring system. Some random script to scrape the > UI may not work. The product may only scale to 20 nodes. Whether these > are "compatible with Apache Hadoop" is awkward to answer generally, > unless we want to define the semantics of that phrase by policy. > > To put it bluntly, why would we bother to define such a policy? One > could assert that a fully-compatible system would implement all the > public/stable APIs as defined in HADOOP-5073, but who would that help? > And though interoperability is certainly relevant to systems built on > top of Hadoop, is there a reason the Apache project needs to be > involved in defining the standards for compatibility among them? Agreed, I'm just thinking about namings and definitions. Even with the stable/unstable internal/external split, there's still the question as to what the semantics of operations are, both explicit (this operation does X) and implicit (and it takes less than Y seconds to do it). It's those implicit things that always catch you out (indeed, they are the argument points in things like Java and Java EE compatibility test kits) From general-return-2908-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 16:49:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63652 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 16:49:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 16:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 48752 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 16:49:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48337 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 16:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48328 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 16:49:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:49:43 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5949170wye.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:49:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr10423837wep.96.1296492561967; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:49:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cos@boudnik.org Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:49:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:49:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9ARYDeF7agxudJpfo9gJ-ft4RrE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 23:19, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched >> (https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) >> I'd like to start a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, >> mapreduce, and hdfs. > > The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to abandon > code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate action some > group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on the code > from Hadoop. > > Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to abandon. > That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves occasionally. > > After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: > > failmon > fault injection This is the best way to kill a project as tightly coupled with the core code as fault injection. So, if you really want to kill it - then move it. > fuse-dfs > hod > kfs > > Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at > least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of > confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure out > which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of > Hadoop they installed. > > -- Owen > > From general-return-2909-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 16:52:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64566 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 16:52:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 16:52:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 55457 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 16:52:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55195 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 16:52:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55187 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 16:52:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:52:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:52:00 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so5744262wwd.29 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.24.207 with SMTP id x57mr6011373wex.89.1296492698116; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:51:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.59.13 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:51:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D46A072.4080801@apache.org> References: <4D46A072.4080801@apache.org> From: Konstantin Boudnik Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:51:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:43, Steve Loughran wrote: > On 31/01/11 05:24, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >> >> Shall we not dictate a location of contrib projects once they are >> moved of Hadoop? If ppl feel like they are better be served by GitHub >> perhaps they should have an option to get hosted there? > > > -I see discussions about Git at the ASF infra mailing lists Then I withdraw my earlier opinion about github vs. *-extras > -the stuff in contrib is code contributed to apache, should still live there > if we can keep it going. Which means people have to step up, or we put it in > some attic > > From general-return-2910-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 20:15:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80644 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 20:15:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 20:15:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 11527 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 20:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11356 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 20:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11340 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 20:15:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:15:12 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2347601yxm.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:14:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=feRghFqcEzLFo8GphP8SBjJNHLlPeaoUEOWRZ5Q0qBk=; b=thZhWw+Z/tXd+opmECjTz2xVh179yvUzv90PbjdLpH717IwJpC8bjpbgMt0fmH1uhV T5poqvhOgrce/QjD4xnzT6l81rOyyu08abqYGzCYtu0K7ywRW5vVociK8kS1aJWDei2r 4P4Uw7AtJy6MrYha7qNYTPFol2gPOMbuBk85I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Rf5oFdeWjcYoYdCESMCcbAkMSLbtt5Haxi8aZJI3jO3kZbspGvl2jJu7FLBojh+JIh ybT4CwGIXFAvktUKK5WfTg0Vjd7tLt9uDlo9ANRPpEBuAJHxMujrrUEBOM39BgKQMYQ3 Cfot0rEHHwDQrg5fDG9T+gK77MQT5BEdXhdn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.102.179 with SMTP id d39mr13450022yhg.48.1296504866302; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:14:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:14:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235448f283016e0a049b2a106b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00235448f283016e0a049b2a106b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think those commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be restored promptly. Thanks, --Konstantin On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any emails. > It times out on native compilation and aborts. > Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and mapreduce > both not compiling. > Can somebody please take a look at this. > The last few lines of the build are below. > > Thanks > --Konstantin > > [javah] [Loaded /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > > [javah] [Loaded /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > [javah] [Forcefully writing file /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > > [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > > Build timed out. Aborting > Build was aborted > [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > Publishing Javadoc > Archiving artifacts > Recording test results > No test report files were found. Configuration error? > > Recording fingerprints > [exec] Terminated > Publishing Clover coverage report... > No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > No emails were triggered. > Finished: ABORTED > > > > --00235448f283016e0a049b2a106b-- From general-return-2911-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 20:27:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85455 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 20:27:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 20:27:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 34690 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 20:27:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34305 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 20:27:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34176 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 20:27:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:27:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:27:40 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Tr+w2wEtZzlBXlFBkGQovadaDnLI/3q/CK9tM3BziqHzu7vL9oCfkhQ7 32g3IiHFBrp+Fm1cloOQ+I1ASmzQtX/+lXuLuXdyXIsvKtniAfHNR73lO ZV+GMEEPlo+VeKG; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1296505656; x=1328041656; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20MRUnit|Date:=20Mon,=2031=20Jan=202011 =2020:28:28=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<0343FB866B8FBA43A230B8D80DF51FED@linkedin .com>|In-Reply-To:=20<5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F4 6@mac.com>|References:=20=0D=0A=20 =0D=0A=20<5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com>; bh=z8v7lOY8/NPDFhLjPHrPbh4AXDkesVV+ScMN+D4qrw8=; b=TA7LCArmbA6+71fcVYoyM8Vibk7p6TCEH1Mjlkvt97ROzhOfn1LUl2+7 4J2oqYpKdEItG8zSrifSlqzvMeb9RRrn3v5vBiHHzNcIclwauR8NmieSN BxdA1gYlBT8+l2K; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,405,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20245436" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:28:29 -0800 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: MRUnit Thread-Topic: MRUnit Thread-Index: AQHLwNVOLs/1E8t4xUiBZrChL+Rz9JPq560AgAATY4CAARPkAA== Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:28:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <5E01B48E-BFE9-45BA-B729-50E692B74F46@mac.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <0343FB866B8FBA43A230B8D80DF51FED@linkedin.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 =09 On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1. I just started a thread on moving all components out of contrib. Pushing them randomly to the web 2.0 version of Sourceforge (where they wi= ll never be seen from again) doesn't sound like a decent, long term strateg= y. From general-return-2912-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 21:31:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17843 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 21:31:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 21:31:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 41775 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:31:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41572 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:31:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41557 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 21:31:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:31:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eli@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:31:45 +0000 Received: by qwe4 with SMTP id 4so6130090qwe.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:31:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.82.80 with SMTP id a16mr6209619qcl.76.1296509484048; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.215.2 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:31:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:31:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Eli Collins To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Konstantin, The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. Thanks, Eli On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think those > commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > restored promptly. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > >> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any emails. >> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and mapred= uce >> both not compiling. >> Can somebody please take a look at this. >> The last few lines of the build are below. >> >> Thanks >> --Konstantin >> >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Loaded /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Com= mon-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUni= xGroupsMapping.class] >> >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Loaded /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/= rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Forcefully writing file /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/wor= kspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/= apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgrou= pMapping.h] >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for gcc... gcc >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... a.= out >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for suffix of executables... >> >> Build timed out. Aborting >> Build was aborted >> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >> Publishing Javadoc >> Archiving artifacts >> Recording test results >> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >> >> Recording fingerprints >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] Terminated >> Publishing Clover coverage report... >> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >> No emails were triggered. >> Finished: ABORTED >> >> >> >> > From general-return-2913-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 21:37:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21077 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 21:37:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 21:37:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 47851 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47578 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47562 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 21:37:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:37:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:37:12 +0000 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so6051927qyk.14 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:36:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.99.130 with SMTP id u2mr6490338qcn.87.1296509811338; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:36:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.75.83 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:36:31 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.105.168.204] In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:36:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b845cc0ad47049b2b365e --0016363b845cc0ad47049b2b365e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the one that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tale I heard from infra. On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Konstantin, > > The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream > maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: > > Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > > Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > > HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > > The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think those > > commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > > restored promptly. > > > > Thanks, > > --Konstantin > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > > > >> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any emails. > >> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > >> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > mapreduce > >> both not compiling. > >> Can somebody please take a look at this. > >> The last few lines of the build are below. > >> > >> Thanks > >> --Konstantin > >> > >> [javah] [Loaded > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > >> > >> [javah] [Loaded > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > >> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > >> > >> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > >> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > >> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > >> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > >> > >> Build timed out. Aborting > >> Build was aborted > >> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > >> Publishing Javadoc > >> Archiving artifacts > >> Recording test results > >> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > >> > >> Recording fingerprints > >> [exec] Terminated > >> Publishing Clover coverage report... > >> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > >> No emails were triggered. > >> Finished: ABORTED > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > --0016363b845cc0ad47049b2b365e-- From general-return-2914-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 21:57:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32226 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 21:57:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 21:57:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 91703 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:57:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91563 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:57:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91548 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 21:57:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:57:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shv.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:57:23 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so2389450yxm.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:57:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0Czt1ROGjTwaHKxGa8XWk0zoMNyrbdA9WOeA4PUjK2c=; b=ULXC3nJoo4zDyiewoZeti6dmxmjhjy+reUYkcRuA6NyeGVDqjC1zTq+uryX28jW+zf vMPNdEI5U4xj6fYFXEkm0BGYad6YG4NcJBwEhlnUgPKfX8BltOIqffp31exKrEcO5wUZ u2RYw1u/+6KQW5OqFyFOTGb3qP3KgHpLudVPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wllqvoxlGrWVYB7KJt7t6Mh1eo0n4yFrIVaGhH2mYuQ1HqjcGO55w/OJKJBnz5Yqmr 4r+eIwrfRxkrr+DLTdeOJKRmtKMA0nQ/66758m/aPWuC7vTSHLgQ+JdlmjdPtgbLuSAZ g6K/qo97gg3X3vkpf8gY+XzTdobKWUsfJNz0E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.95.17 with SMTP id o17mr13694300yhf.35.1296511021757; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.35 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:57:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:57:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 From: Konstantin Shvachko To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023544fb8dce63645049b2b7ed5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023544fb8dce63645049b2b7ed5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. Try to build trunk. This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by HADOOP-6904 are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit build is broken. See here. https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/ As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated HADOOP-6864. I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be digested by Hudson since then. Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caused by HADOOP-6864. Thanks, --Konstantin On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the one > that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the > clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tale I > heard from infra. > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > Hey Konstantin, > > > > The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > > which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > > for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream > > maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > > > > Thanks, > > Eli > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > wrote: > > > Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > > > Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > > > HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > > > The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think > those > > > commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > > > restored promptly. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > emails. > > >> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > > >> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > > mapreduce > > >> both not compiling. > > >> Can somebody please take a look at this. > > >> The last few lines of the build are below. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> --Konstantin > > >> > > >> [javah] [Loaded > > > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > > >> > > >> [javah] [Loaded > > > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > > >> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > > > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > > >> > > >> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > > >> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > > >> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > > >> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > > >> > > >> Build timed out. Aborting > > >> Build was aborted > > >> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > > >> Publishing Javadoc > > >> Archiving artifacts > > >> Recording test results > > >> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > > >> > > >> Recording fingerprints > > >> [exec] Terminated > > >> Publishing Clover coverage report... > > >> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > > >> No emails were triggered. > > >> Finished: ABORTED > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --0023544fb8dce63645049b2b7ed5-- From general-return-2915-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 23:11:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77215 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 23:11:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 23:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 1934 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:11:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1647 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:11:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1632 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 23:11:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:11:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:11:08 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so6573416iwn.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.36.133 with SMTP id t5mr7349639ibd.12.1296515444839; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:10:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.19 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:10:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:10:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221540147e891775049b2c868f --00221540147e891775049b2c868f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > > Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caused by > HADOOP-6864. > I can build common trunk just fine on CentOS 5.5 including native. I think the issue is somehow isolated to the build machines. Anyone know what OS they've got? Or can I swing an account on the box where the failures are happening? -Todd > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the > one > > that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the > > clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tale I > > heard from infra. > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > > > > Hey Konstantin, > > > > > > The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, > > > which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other > > > for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream > > > maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eli > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > wrote: > > > > Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. > > > > Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since > > > > HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. > > > > The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think > > those > > > > commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be > > > > restored promptly. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any > > emails. > > > >> It times out on native compilation and aborts. > > > >> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and > > > mapreduce > > > >> both not compiling. > > > >> Can somebody please take a look at this. > > > >> The last few lines of the build are below. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> --Konstantin > > > >> > > > >> [javah] [Loaded > > > > > > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] > > > >> > > > >> [javah] [Loaded > > > > > > /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class)] > > > >> [javah] [Forcefully writing file > > > > > > /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] > > > >> > > > >> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc > > > >> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes > > > >> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... > a.out > > > >> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... > > > >> > > > >> Build timed out. Aborting > > > >> Build was aborted > > > >> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > > > >> Publishing Javadoc > > > >> Archiving artifacts > > > >> Recording test results > > > >> No test report files were found. Configuration error? > > > >> > > > >> Recording fingerprints > > > >> [exec] Terminated > > > >> Publishing Clover coverage report... > > > >> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure > > > >> No emails were triggered. > > > >> Finished: ABORTED > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00221540147e891775049b2c868f-- From general-return-2916-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 23:12:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77504 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 23:12:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 23:12:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 4443 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:12:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4373 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:12:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4365 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 23:12:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:12:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:11:59 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6029553iyb.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xEUlHosdM3wxNOZMS2ZP4kviAlUsfCz0gYNqZRDtRvI=; b=tkXkSVS+VGVVJ2V7y3a0/+Yulk1Hf4P23/uBk3Bs0ntGK9khd+xQ3xX4iPARL/X0jm cT3ZKIr3HO0X3zcfPUQa/36afIe3Hzp74jpDuujC/phSy5+IaH1NWxEi4m+Nbvimt34V A4HLvIBBwwDlaxXPbdS80HHIzaZf2ezb1EV8E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ex27jF6nxEnADAup+RsetHg4uWRY1yIo1Ip6SdsFuXaYYxJCVzJYciQAcMB59FrZDt 9qdjQ9Gbckptych9SNGRIG+RjR2c8wHsFppQxruwmv86Hrv0OCD1R4wI5Mp02LV5rdyF JpMLmFE5qA6U6nETwAB03R4xXXQh/kbMzlZFE= Received: by 10.231.36.12 with SMTP id r12mr7452755ibd.69.1296515498404; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.163 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jakob Homan Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past them. -Jakob On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. Try= to > build trunk. > This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by HADOOP-690= 4 > are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. > HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. > > Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit > build is broken. See here. > https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-t= runk-Commit/ > > As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated > HADOOP-6864. > I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be digeste= d > by Hudson since then. > > Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caused = by > HADOOP-6864. > > Thanks, > --Konstantin > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning wrot= e: > >> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the o= ne >> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the >> clover license isn't being found properly. =A0At least, that is the tale= I >> heard from infra. >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >> > Hey Konstantin, >> > >> > The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >> > which was fixed. =A0Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >> > for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream >> > maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Eli >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> > wrote: >> > > Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >> > > Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >> > > HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >> > > The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >> those >> > > commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >> > > restored promptly. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > --Konstantin >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >> emails. >> > >> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >> > >> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >> > mapreduce >> > >> both not compiling. >> > >> Can somebody please take a look at this. >> > >> The last few lines of the build are below. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks >> > >> --Konstantin >> > >> >> > >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Loaded >> > >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >> > >> >> > >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Loaded >> > >> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.= class)] >> > >> =A0 =A0 [javah] [Forcefully writing file >> > >> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/b= uild/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop_= security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >> > >> >> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for gcc... gcc >> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for C compiler default output file name.= .. a.out >> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] checking for suffix of executables... >> > >> >> > >> Build timed out. Aborting >> > >> Build was aborted >> > >> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >> > >> Publishing Javadoc >> > >> Archiving artifacts >> > >> Recording test results >> > >> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >> > >> >> > >> Recording fingerprints >> > >> =A0 =A0 =A0[exec] Terminated >> > >> Publishing Clover coverage report... >> > >> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >> > >> No emails were triggered. >> > >> Finished: ABORTED >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > From general-return-2917-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 23:23:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81075 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 23:23:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23833 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23713 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23705 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:23:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mbhandarkar@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:23:12 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:From:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=jIKrlNpe42cpW2c6lNiW0Net5Racxjf3A1x7/VGAuViUGPYUPYHwslZ/ TbRDPPYeG22VBhoAiaHTJsttoksCGp4+rYZzIa7qfkk2m9yAEfa8oL47D kik8xpXv2sl37O0; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linkedin.com; i=mbhandarkar@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1296516188; x=1328052188; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Milind=20Bhandarkar=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20[DISCUSS]=20Move=20common,=20hdfs,=20ma preduce=20contrib=20components=20to=0D=0A=20apache-extras .org=20or=20elsewhere|Date:=20Mon,=2031=20Jan=202011=2023 :24:01=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A=20; bh=6TjRZCmxx4wpO32ncpe5LowzSywmwjvWn14uotpAF8Q=; b=xcuk49MOmGbrdnxvNYDbiHOMTHgstT+pupoUL+ZXqopeGTEcgRxA5Q+B utVMWi4WV6ILpktAUEJW7AZ5hhPAstjW3QHX9kxmpt95OT9YvE6GqTUOp DqMG15enOoJ0BsH; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,406,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="20253152" Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi id 14.01.0251.000; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:24:01 -0800 From: Milind Bhandarkar To: "" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere Thread-Index: AQHLwPke33yZZGIxw0G/PYBJkE27F5PrMnYAgAENQoA= Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:24:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.18.46.247] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Owen, I am surprised to not see jute (aka hadoop recordio) on this list. - milind On Jan 30, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: >=20 > On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >=20 >> Now that http://apache-extras.org is launched (https://blogs.apache.org/= foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_launches) I'd like to start= a discussion on moving contrib components out of common, mapreduce, and hd= fs. >=20 > The PMC can't "move" code to Apache extras. It can only choose to abandon= code that it doesn't want to support any longer. As a separate action some= group of developers may create projects in Apache Extras based on the code= from Hadoop. >=20 > Therefore the question is really what if any code Hadoop wants to abandon= . That is a good question and one that we should ask ourselves occasionally= . >=20 > After a quick consideration, my personal list would look like: >=20 > failmon > fault injection > fuse-dfs > hod > kfs >=20 > Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at l= east 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of conf= usion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure out whic= h fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of Hadoop= they installed. >=20 > -- Owen >=20 --- Milind Bhandarkar mbhandarkar@linkedin.com From general-return-2918-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 23:24:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81276 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 23:24:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 23:24:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 25778 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25716 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25708 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 23:23:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:23:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of todd@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:23:51 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so6038396iyb.35 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.84 with SMTP id fx20mr7337587ibb.62.1296516210476; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:23:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.19 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:23:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:23:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move common, hdfs, mapreduce contrib components to apache-extras.org or elsewhere To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fc5142bc6e4049b2cb420 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba4fc5142bc6e4049b2cb420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > Also note that pushing code out of Hadoop has a high cost. There are at > least 3 forks of the hadoop-gpl-compression code. That creates a lot of > confusion for the users. A lot of users never go to the work to figure out > which fork and branch of hadoop-gpl-compression work with the version of > Hadoop they installed. > > Indeed it creates confusion, but in my opinion it has been very successful modulo that confusion. In particular, Kevin and I (who each have a repo on github but basically co-maintain a branch) have done about 8 bugfix releases of LZO in the last year. The ability to take a bug and turn it around into a release within a few days has been very beneficial to the users. If it were part of core Hadoop, people would be forced to live with these blocker bugs for months at a time between dot releases. IMO the more we can take non-core components and move them to separate release timelines, the better. Yes, it is harder for users, but it also is easier for them when they hit a bug - they don't have to wait months for a wholesale upgrade which might contain hundreds of other changes to core components. I think this will also help the situation where people have set up shop on branches -- a lot of the value of these branches comes from the frequency of backports and bugfixes to "non-core" components. If the non-core stuff were on a faster timeline upstream, we could maintain core stability while also offering people the latest and greatest libraries, tools, codecs, etc. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --90e6ba4fc5142bc6e4049b2cb420-- From general-return-2919-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 31 23:34:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84087 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 23:34:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 23:34:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 34219 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:34:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34146 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 23:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34138 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 23:34:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:34:31 +0000 Received: from SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp2-ex07cas02.corp.sp2.yahoo.com [98.137.59.38]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p0VNXlEJ096189 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:33:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.30]) by SP2-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([98.137.59.38]) with mapi; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:33:47 -0800 From: "Giridharan Kesavan" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:33:46 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Topic: Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing since 01/19/2011 Thread-Index: AcvBn05jdVFXLDX2QMyu6Iz0pmLN5g== Message-ID: <7DC70A70-5DE9-4288-A44B-B5EF9C454D9B@yahoo-inc.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 ant mvn-deploy would publish snapshot artifact to the apache maven reposito= ry as long you have the right credentials in ~/.m2/settings.xml. For settings.xml template pls look at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRe= lease I'm pushing the latest common artifacts now. -Giri On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > By manually installing a new core jar into the cache, I can compile > trunk. Looks like we just need to kick a new Core into maven. Are > there instructions somewhere for committers to do this? I know Nigel > and Owen know how, but I don't know if the knowledge is diffused past > them. > -Jakob >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Konstantin Shvachko > wrote: >> Current trunk for HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling at the moment. Tr= y to >> build trunk. >> This is the result of that changes to common api introduced by HADOOP-69= 04 >> are not promoted to HDFS and MR trunks. >> HDFS-1335 and MAPREDUCE-2263 depend on these changes. >>=20 >> Common is not promoted to HDFS and MR because Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit >> build is broken. See here. >> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-Common-= trunk-Commit/ >>=20 >> As I see the last successful build was on 01/19, which integrated >> HADOOP-6864. >> I think this is when JNI changes were introduced, which cannot be digest= ed >> by Hudson since then. >>=20 >> Anybody with gcc active could you please verify if the problem is caused= by >> HADOOP-6864. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> --Konstantin >>=20 >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ted Dunning wro= te: >>=20 >>> The has been a problem with more than one build failing (Mahout is the = one >>> that I saw first) due to a change in maven version which meant that the >>> clover license isn't being found properly. At least, that is the tale = I >>> heard from infra. >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eli Collins wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hey Konstantin, >>>>=20 >>>> The only build breakage I saw from HADOOP-6904 is MAPREDUCE-2290, >>>> which was fixed. Trees from trunk are compiling against each other >>>> for me (eg each installed to a local maven repo), perhaps the upstream >>>> maven repo hasn't been updated with the latest bits yet. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Eli >>>>=20 >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>> wrote: >>>>> Sending this to general to attract urgent attention. >>>>> Both HDFS and MapReduce are not compiling since >>>>> HADOOP-6904 and its hdfs and MP counterparts were committed. >>>>> The problem is not with this patch as described below, but I think >>> those >>>>> commits should be reversed if Common integration build cannot be >>>>> restored promptly. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> I see Hadoop-common-trunk-Commit is failing and not sending any >>> emails. >>>>>> It times out on native compilation and aborts. >>>>>> Therefore changes are not integrated, and now it lead to hdfs and >>>> mapreduce >>>>>> both not compiling. >>>>>> Can somebody please take a look at this. >>>>>> The last few lines of the build are below. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> --Konstantin >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>=20 >>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/= build/classes/org/apache/hadoop/security/JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.class] >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> [javah] [Loaded >>>>=20 >>> /homes/hudson/tools/java/jdk1.6.0_11-32/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object= .class)] >>>>>> [javah] [Forcefully writing file >>>>=20 >>> /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/trunk/= build/native/Linux-i386-32/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/org_apache_hadoop= _security_JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping.h] >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> [exec] checking for gcc... gcc >>>>>> [exec] checking whether the C compiler works... yes >>>>>> [exec] checking for C compiler default output file name... a.ou= t >>>>>> [exec] checking for suffix of executables... >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Build timed out. Aborting >>>>>> Build was aborted >>>>>> [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED >>>>>> Publishing Javadoc >>>>>> Archiving artifacts >>>>>> Recording test results >>>>>> No test report files were found. Configuration error? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Recording fingerprints >>>>>> [exec] Terminated >>>>>> Publishing Clover coverage report... >>>>>> No Clover report will be published due to a Build Failure >>>>>> No emails were triggered. >>>>>> Finished: ABORTED >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 From general-return-113-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 05 19:26:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75142 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 19:26:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 19:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 11157 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 19:26:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11026 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 19:26:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10929 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 19:26:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:26:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:26:04 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n15JOxCZ054669; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:25:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=sUIQ/XZ50J8TlBSreY1fE9LDEEf85QEL8DRorIQuMHHN2tElarSVSwWBZDtB9yO3 Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:25:04 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C987C7.71C09061" Subject: Hadoop Summit 2009 - Call for submissions Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:25:03 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop Summit 2009 - Call for submissions Thread-Index: AcmHx3Gv8JhZBWiDTGWZWJ+ZECcFuQ== From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2009 19:25:04.0283 (UTC) FILETIME=[724F96B0:01C987C7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C987C7.71C09061 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We are planning the 2009 Hadoop Summit, to be held the second week of June in Santa Clara, CA. =20 Please send me (aanand@yahoo-inc.com) your presentation proposals and suggested topics. =20 Areas we plan to cover include: - Core Hadoop - areas of development and key contributions - Subprojects and related projects: including Pig, Hive, Hbase, Mahout, Zookeeper and others - Administration: Monitoring tools and framework, services, experiences with administering Hadoop clusters - Adoption: Deployment examples, hosted services - Applications on Hadoop: examples of innovative applications being developed and deployed on Hadoop - Research: Research topics being explored, university research examples =20 Thanks, and looking forward to a strong event, Ajay ------_=_NextPart_001_01C987C7.71C09061-- From general-return-114-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 11 16:54:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33565 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2009 16:54:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2009 16:54:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69340 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2009 16:54:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69186 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2009 16:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69173 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2009 16:54:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:54:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:54:38 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.195] (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c33.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.33]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n1BGrSvf068762 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:53:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=zwynOc5sVsSjwxgauL8Jd6E4pWfhcb8NVVO04iIxIWkwYFheF8dpLLWjSvQRwCvX Message-Id: <2FF6742D-7C82-4EAE-8266-A2E48160B728@yahoo-inc.com> From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Stale committer lists for most Hadoop projects Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:53:29 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It looks like some Hadoop subprojects have stale committer lists. Please check your list and have it updated. I know that Hive is out of date. Others may be as well. http://hadoop.apache.org/core/credits.html http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/credits.html http://hadoop.apache.org/hive/credits.html http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html (why isn't this credits.html?) http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/credits.html Cheers, Nige From general-return-115-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 11 18:37:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97729 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2009 18:37:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2009 18:37:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 84350 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2009 18:37:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84327 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2009 18:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84314 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2009 18:37:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:37:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.14 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.14] (HELO mail-fx0-f14.google.com) (209.85.220.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:37:26 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so640537fxm.5 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:37:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HHMtGe4TqNX38+1rwrnprHCRUtJIM7U0NiMgOSrKmzY=; b=EGGgcxJMXP1O1HZEd9QBbaXfy4OzB8TMTWN4+j24XJSE1hLXTuGoNXzo0uwM+RK33j YazM2rc92XAr5WaqrctgNLb/ugpTa314f3Zux1wPHUONHXjp281prf/79UwWkyNEaliJ tjLFMSymkKqIQiqtGqOtEtseWc6C1hW/hdYHo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W2AFZy7lgmXEcvxYQkYsVzPm9V8FnYVPxYBYRlbZgjRzwHXRr4+fKewln92512wtpC IjR9G6gzPn0aPHJy4jBbab3cMwJ0zEo0WqNmaCwgpvNEi+JlHapYKDRf9CTDRJjYUZVU KuP4sb/Ne909OKHqdDcbjPi8r787mwFwQDYfk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.105.208 with SMTP id u16mr236875fao.14.1234377424541; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:37:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2FF6742D-7C82-4EAE-8266-A2E48160B728@yahoo-inc.com> References: <2FF6742D-7C82-4EAE-8266-A2E48160B728@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:36:58 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70902111036j2e923045se25388319164262f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Stale committer lists for most Hadoop projects From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c599f3e899af0462a8e39e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c599f3e899af0462a8e39e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Nigel, The Hive committer list is very much upto date. There are two more persons whose VOTES have been approved but their apache accounts have not yet been created, that's why you do not see them (yet) in the list. thanks, dhruba On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > It looks like some Hadoop subprojects have stale committer lists. Please > check your list and have it updated. I know that Hive is out of date. > Others may be as well. > > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/credits.html > http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/credits.html > http://hadoop.apache.org/hive/credits.html > http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/whoweare.html (why isn't this credits.html?) > http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/credits.html > > Cheers, > Nige > --001636c599f3e899af0462a8e39e-- From general-return-116-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 12 21:47:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62411 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2009 21:47:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2009 21:47:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 66612 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2009 21:47:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66501 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2009 21:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66389 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2009 21:47:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:47:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:47:33 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n1CLkeWB090826; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:46:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:cc:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=NoZK174FV7V6ZFC7ZAhVgHBrMJy5tppeDYrFd2X2nkCL97fFHkq7+Muqxx8DTezC Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:46:40 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C98D5B.59AA6101" Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 2/18 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:46:25 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 2/18 Thread-Index: AcmNW1p3QQcXNKUgTi6+Qtm5ky8HQA== From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, Cc: , "Aaron Kimball" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2009 21:46:40.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[632B9230:01C98D5B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C98D5B.59AA6101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 18th at Yahoo! 2811 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 2, Training Rooms 5 & 6 from 6:00-7:30 pm. =20 Agenda: Fair Scheduler for Hadoop - Matei Zaharia Interfacing with MySQL - Aaron Kimball =20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1776616/ =20 As always, suggestions for topics for future meetings are welcome. Please send them to me directly at aanand@yahoo-inc.com =20 Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C98D5B.59AA6101-- From general-return-117-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 13 21:51:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61456 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2009 21:51:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2009 21:51:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 15773 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2009 21:51:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14703 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2009 21:51:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14439 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2009 21:51:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:51:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.126.228.150] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com) (207.126.228.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:51:12 +0000 Received: from [172.21.148.114] (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-114.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by rsmtp2.corp.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n1DLollp095468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:50:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4995EB37.6090603@apache.org> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:50:47 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.1.0. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. Key features of the 3.1.0 release: * Quota support * BookKeeper - a system to reliably log streams of records * JMX for server management * many fixes, improvements, improved documentation, etc... A bit about BookKeeper: a system to reliably log streams of records. In BookKeeper, servers are "bookies", log streams are "ledgers", and each unit of a log (aka record) is a "ledger entry". BookKeeper is designed to be reliable; bookies, the servers that store ledgers can be byzantine, which means that some subset of the bookies can fail, corrupt data, discard data, but as long as there are enough correctly behaving servers the service as a whole behaves correctly; the meta data for BookKeeper is stored in ZooKeeper. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.1.0 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.1.0/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-118-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Feb 16 10:41:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33927 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2009 10:41:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2009 10:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 40357 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 10:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40159 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2009 10:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40148 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2009 10:41:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:41:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.15] (HELO mail-ew0-f15.google.com) (209.85.219.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:41:19 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1710209ewy.5 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.45.17 with SMTP id s17mr4264619ebs.126.1234780857362; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:40:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.180.255.165? (hq.last.fm [195.24.233.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm6830989gvb.9.2009.02.16.02.40.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:40:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499942B2.3000205@oskarsson.nu> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:40:50 +0000 From: Johan Oskarsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hive builds on Hudson - Cobertura or Clover? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi. I've recently setup nightly builds of Apache Hive on Hudson. The setup is fairly basic and we'd like to add a code coverage tool to the build process. The options right now are Cobertura or Clover. I'm leaning towards Cobertura, since that's what I have used before and it is free for anyone to use. Even if Apache have a Clover license I assume developers can't install that locally. On the other hand it would make sense to use the same software as Hadoop does. I am a bit curious about the Cobertura license though, http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/license.html It seems the software is GPL2 but the Ant tasks Apache v1.1 Would this stop us from installing it on the Hudson machine? http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/ http://www.atlassian.com/software/clover/ /Johan From general-return-119-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 21:29:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80670 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 21:29:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 21:29:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25329 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 21:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25309 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 21:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25298 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 21:29:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:29:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.48] (HELO QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:29:19 +0000 Received: from OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KnqK1b00D16AWCUA5xUxt4; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:28:57 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id KxUo1b00U2SbwD58SxUr8W; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:28:55 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:28:47 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own. -- Owen From general-return-120-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 21:54:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1650 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 21:54:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 21:54:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 53952 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 21:54:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53928 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 21:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53917 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 21:54:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:54:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:54:24 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n1OLrG4G068970 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:53:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=nKoSbhZlCPobRb5S1loMhFUNhXx1/BpqR3UCRdVWGOWje6fkmwxaQhkiviMVNa6H Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:53:24 -0800 Received: from 10.72.111.153 ([10.72.111.153]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:53:23 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:53:23 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject From: Eric Yang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Thread-Index: AcmWylA1V7PHPREJWkuYWsqMXuJwKQ== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2009 21:53:24.0419 (UTC) FILETIME=[510DD130:01C996CA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 This is great for Chukwa to manage it's own release schedule and branches. Regards, Eric On 2/24/09 1:28 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently > in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: > Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new > project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some > hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be > on its own. > > -- Owen From general-return-121-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 22:22:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27125 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 22:22:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 22:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2410 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:22:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2359 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:22:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2302 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 22:22:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:22:38 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:22:28 +0000 Received: from wlan-mc2-146-156.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c112.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.112]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n1OMKqeh062848; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:20:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=1awvUFn2WYnUHPgK76bVLNQUPL9kYXeNaNh9b8OUK1Ra5ZBmxYd9lzorStIiJxZ6 Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.19.1 available Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:20:51 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.19.1 fixes many critical bugs in 0.19.0, including ***some data loss issues***. The release also introduces an ***incompatible change*** by disabling the file append API (HADOOP-5224) until it can be stabilized. For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Hadoop 0.19.1 Release Notes are at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.19.1/releasenotes.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From general-return-122-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 22:23:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27863 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 22:23:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 22:23:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5507 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:23:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5484 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:23:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5473 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 22:23:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:23:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:23:09 +0000 Received: from wlan-mc2-146-156.corp.yahoo.com (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c112.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.112]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n1OMKqei062848 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:21:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=eCK8ThjfF0WaoYbBB9gLd8Nc733qUwYa+z0U6fsdC0Bi5QNpGNPsF8v6VKqn8L97 Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:21:43 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > +1 > > This is great for Chukwa to manage it's own release schedule and > branches. > > Regards, > Eric > > On 2/24/09 1:28 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >> I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is >> currently >> in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: >> Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new >> project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need >> some >> hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be >> on its own. >> >> -- Owen > From general-return-123-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 22:32:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35015 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 22:32:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 22:32:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 20228 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:32:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20094 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:32:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20083 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 22:32:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:32:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.37.39] (HELO web53606.mail.re2.yahoo.com) (206.190.37.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:32:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 64436 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Feb 2009 22:32:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=zshS73NFxM2W7RQGyFLN3b8fiLZmXv9Wen5e7l6l+5xC4V0ehIsW7Zp8dBj6qoskGNdFEaSxNJbwDoJM/odeF0YNUlDLtSgZrltZEnu5trg/uajuSpUGkQXbyEf5YD2ACx0EX/YqPoIu+PBN/bAHkund5zunchC7d5tOFf1DlwU=; X-YMail-OSG: FYLGpjkVM1kCrMnj1QYMUOwnTmH2ymYBlDpNXiaUlghZYstReLIzrRYZX7Is0BD7oEFmXcY30QJmV0OqOuYED97GlN6KpQJ2XD8Ous4.n91SToBGruEChkwDb2VKhIs1huotm4yXRPrVlFShLKKmoV1NkpDUUUlZnGM9YdAblCyN6mTsp5tS9Lg00LqbGGEXJTyb2mjp6sjT5s.V2QmX8OoHCGoMcQ-- Received: from [4.78.243.126] by web53606.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:32:13 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1156.82 YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 References: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:32:13 -0800 (PST) From: lohit Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <311828.61796.qm@web53606.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Thanks, Lohit ----- Original Message ---- From: Eric Yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:53:23 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject +1 This is great for Chukwa to manage it's own release schedule and branches. Regards, Eric On 2/24/09 1:28 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently > in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: > Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new > project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some > hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be > on its own. > > -- Owen From general-return-124-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 22:39:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37911 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28367 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28334 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28323 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:39:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.168] (HELO mail-fx0-f168.google.com) (209.85.220.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:39:27 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so3587020fxm.5 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.208 with SMTP id f16mr168223faq.91.1235515145332; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:39:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? (93-96-139-213.zone4.bethere.co.uk [93.96.139.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm190334eya.36.2009.02.24.14.39.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:39:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49A47703.3060300@oskarsson.nu> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:38:59 +0000 From: Johan Oskarsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently > in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: > Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new > project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some > hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be > on its own. > > -- Owen From general-return-125-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 23:58:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81417 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 33274 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33062 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53136 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 21:52:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.226 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUZYQkjiBXOD/BtaQby7BzyR4MQpxKhwmHAj0cVqIOE=; b=hbyn8UjdIr5hDsoDW/7dlAkgk5UkVcHEX8bISCpkXFvejeOLK6w7DP2KVbfyWAZsqa +cVP7XgPixZ9AYVW9QXzmM0WRNBEuKvuvcbChjwRkrrJR4T8hc75NkEjOdzz1leVUfkf wJ21se6X2tNQ05mKUiv7QclvXBnNMa0+me5bA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uNGMWaHorv5KYxBgpRS84e11qD/amerTgIMDgnF4C4TYKC6ulvkSqUX5yP8eeeVU9G rRPys2e8q7y7Q2pmsL+Z5CJfZWUXG6o+cOL3yAS0594ejGmcgauipZ99+y/FLO5xPWVM krILzPT/61jdlWs/V3sI362g0LsGRViU/cWyY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:52:01 -0800 Message-ID: <39b0afc00902241352j2ab5374fw3589fc3f7fd64db9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject From: Ariel Rabkin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Being a subproject would be good; we're pretty loosely coupled with Hadoop at this point. +1. --Ari -- Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com UC Berkeley Computer Science Department From general-return-126-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 23:58:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81505 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 23:58:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 33524 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33327 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36064 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 22:46:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.44.28 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8qgKy72UvWC3qkedGOUBwcJnvHH0uz6MqeLg+HG8EKE=; b=IVTaqqmRaZIfaMJphTZGVfu11PfHvpRhg5ldTjmsm2x4tkLx/e/xncf6g+tjj6eSmx mEon4ttymQtZiexJbMHcq7nALEG/9Bk3wlDq3Bi6vkNkTXuUj/yPxY02G7XoumCso/O9 wrCzQf6fVJlhB/rEiSmkkz6dIf+nJHwpS+Alw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ojoc/mNy+P0UQEcxE+/WVt2NKBLSMuVMSEWFd9ZZuU01lLihNEHnTH37b8adR3ov07 Db7VVX1vfkXbFNosc7CBZvBFqi0a/ypdomp5a03UQFSMECXr5W6ScUBC79vFnMH64oGf Lh8b4MLHqomWMXzpCZGSqOtyUJx9zQ8bZ2uS4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:46:08 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b1e8330f4f750ca7 Message-ID: <7c962aed0902241446x6ed2bc2bx4e75928cb70447aa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64418dc9a4f260463b1e2a9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64418dc9a4f260463b1e2a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently in > Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric Yang, > and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both of > the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I think > it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own. > > -- Owen > --0016e64418dc9a4f260463b1e2a9-- From general-return-127-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Feb 24 23:58:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81707 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 23:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 33854 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33829 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33818 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 23:58:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.170] (HELO mail-gx0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:58:19 +0000 Received: by gxk18 with SMTP id 18so7877330gxk.5 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=epZbqVAqXRKSMhmDel8eWwEQbWo7fCzcubw/zgFiEU8=; b=jQPkkFCtXoDSoAjNdmw0mIqig49X6IRLt+Tig5v/yGSOIBASwpmBva8tjNomYb16Hc 3I9erjGVTrdDj8udLNeThCYa727k2L0bDdLF7PxAwFFdowXSwPs7oIKHhBt/39FCA6Fg Y9aSKFme157VISFJXqdCd7Px3xF+tDkqqhgK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x9mOoNVp5ZA/kAQRdl5ICzDbv+ilthJVkR9a/ysV3iA8kusoMP9YposCX3mVzP8uAV 73iQ4jbAxGb0q+pLk96Jqs7HDR5x92vd/Df1xxPt4rsX3PQqScb2WRkg2d3I+HPJVYRi gB9iL/6JPnNKnHHVWkwSpLTSvApxft98/d9gI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.204 with SMTP id c12mr383908ibb.20.1235519877920; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49A47703.3060300@oskarsson.nu> References: <49A47703.3060300@oskarsson.nu> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Tom On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Johan Oskarsson wrote: > +1 > > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> >> I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently in >> Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric Yang, >> and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both of >> the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I think >> it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own. >> >> -- Owen > > From general-return-128-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 25 00:32:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2806 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2009 00:31:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2009 00:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 64361 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 00:31:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64328 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 00:31:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64317 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2009 00:31:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:59 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.170] (HELO mail-gx0-f170.google.com) (209.85.217.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:31:52 +0000 Received: by gxk18 with SMTP id 18so7921561gxk.5 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GFh2BwaI31zrmh3xPd8afMdZTdpjfUwr1cZxpRpPcFM=; b=G7aZG6mUlYLwGxJeJ6mqFGot46fd9d3g+QEH5+KRFHyZkbQY7netQ8+AA0yr61ne91 Pd7sP6IhELKgC2b71qJ+E2+KSwev5NJQKeAtnnbKhlz7IxnOVEOOdJi2/HfyuPz/z4+y YcpBrbvAES57NFb/J3cgvadqWaLonb2bX2Vg8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gpom/KqWZEzmUa+2NyY/Zd6xkYSKtxbwPNDHvZTur4Qqi6Ekwj2He/ERYkhowYNbdo XsCdtM/4vgQW6JQYYY/fK6mMvQEpmqBYCyDIaV+d7iAaWrEkqnqY9qWEXGjC8WNLI+Pr 9l2g2gRHwTojVXpEG7ZndDTW1Kg8lrQHl2D2I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.53.5 with SMTP id b5mr2514170aga.91.1235521891497; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <49A47703.3060300@oskarsson.nu> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:31 -0800 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70902241631p7ff89d67kefa32ff269f6af61@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636283b0a7479210463b35b37 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636283b0a7479210463b35b37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Tom White wrote: > +1 > > Tom > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Johan Oskarsson > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> > >> I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently > in > >> Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric > Yang, > >> and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both > of > >> the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I > think > >> it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own. > >> > >> -- Owen > > > > > --001636283b0a7479210463b35b37-- From general-return-129-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 25 06:17:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22043 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2009 06:17:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2009 06:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 96773 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 06:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96746 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 06:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96735 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2009 06:17:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:17:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of angsuman@taragana.com designates 72.36.134.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.36.134.170] (HELO mail.taragana.com) (72.36.134.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:17:30 +0000 Received: from jaguar.taragana.org (unknown [59.162.191.56]) by mail.taragana.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD9B1ED0001 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:22 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <49A4E262.7080508@taragana.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:47:06 +0530 From: Angsuman Chakraborty User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010801090907090303060503" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------010801090907090303060503 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090406070009050209050405" --------------090406070009050209050405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 Angsuman Chakraborty Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently > in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: > Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new > project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some > hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be > on its own. > > -- Owen > -- Angsuman Chakraborty CEO Taragana Inc. http://www.taragana.com | http://blog.taragana.com | http://angsuman.taragana.net You can follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/angsuman AIM: angsuman, Yahoo IM: angsuman --------------090406070009050209050405 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1

Angsuman Chakraborty

Owen O'Malley wrote:
I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own.

-- Owen


-- 
Angsuman Chakraborty
CEO Taragana Inc.
http://www.taragana.com | http://blog.taragana.com | http://angsuman.taragana.net

You can follow me on twitter - http://twitter.com/angsuman
AIM: angsuman, Yahoo IM: angsuman
--------------090406070009050209050405-- --------------010801090907090303060503-- From general-return-130-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Feb 25 17:07:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74167 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2009 17:07:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2009 17:07:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 45927 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 17:07:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45890 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 17:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29524 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2009 10:27:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of work.aviad@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.167 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=JuQ1oyXNUe4iuZ3P5Y/csNesu/xoxdH6Yr72668jPPc=; b=oxNJlS7HqbZv0fclovKKCEkiAvyvSJKKBqpRxhnfAApMai9GOPtmCX5sA5YSmtLvWU TvOVzr9+Tl4PVq7VUAjXpNsDkhFxp4x9pI/OJxDEr5xP3b7EYR+4RP388Fk8cqc5TdJS UEbMLbj7if6uIiizJBxCoxHIAjiSAvaWIA2HY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=sf8Xk/efbuTq4UWX4W7pL1GxvzHXzqu9AeinlJJIJ6BTN57pCwN2rHbdMA8z+Nw8lc tBgm/qb/xc/Unj9kB4V8voHrfqdR6TvwH12Jh+htDZSyhnEYBZT+wKPa/Y42nBbl2Vyn 5aHwpazvLPHi6r36z++ImVeUEuscz5L6KBBjY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: work.aviad@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:27:10 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c027fa681f8c8d06 Message-ID: <6a3f6a4b0902250227m10d46683m62f5ed7737ca5f5d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.19.1 available From: Aviad sela To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7d272ac4e150463bbad72 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f7d272ac4e150463bbad72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nigel, The SVN tag http://svn.apach.org/repos/asf/core/tags/release-0.19.1 include also the branch folder branch-0.19 which results with double size project which is not necessary. I need to use this release to apply patch HADOOP-4546 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel ) I don't know how the above branch folder should contribute when building the new eclipse project. Isn't it going to be correct to remove this branch folder from the release tag ? Thanks, On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Release 0.19.1 fixes many critical bugs in 0.19.0, including ***some data > loss issues***. The release also introduces an ***incompatible change*** by > disabling the file append API (HADOOP-5224) until it can be stabilized. > > For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html > > Hadoop 0.19.1 Release Notes are at > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.19.1/releasenotes.html > > Thanks to all who contributed to this release! > > Nigel > > > > --001485f7d272ac4e150463bbad72-- From general-return-131-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Feb 26 23:45:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58533 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2009 23:45:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2009 23:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 76713 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2009 23:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76685 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2009 23:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76670 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2009 23:45:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:45:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:45:09 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n1QNiY20088869 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:44:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=JkNnEZkoT0dM7MJtcuQIv3bGS4OZZyBgcT+qKl22RnaBlzCG9eNSGL91Kljg/mpm Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:44:34 -0800 From: Jerome Boulon To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:44:32 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Thread-Index: AcmYbCwR1qnrY0wx2E6GYihgATjduA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Owen O'Malley wrote: I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is currently in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers will be: Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still a new project and both of the committers are new, so it will still need some hand-holding, but I thin= k it is moving fast enough that it should be on its own. -- Owen From general-return-132-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 27 05:56:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84221 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2009 05:56:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2009 05:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 55334 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 05:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55298 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 05:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55287 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2009 05:56:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of 1989.gaurav@googlemail.com designates 74.125.44.30 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.44.30] (HELO yx-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.44.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:56:20 +0000 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so628630yxb.29 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:55:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BnhdAA7JI0wgH4hOClNbbp2j66lb/mJ5nYDfwaOmRUQ=; b=EgbSDW4FTYRzuO67s20WdATFiW3Wr+yqqkvpfSmKd+OTyybT/bOQv4MQdbE270i3Rf STvPyS/Zj3kLAsjNxgxLWjBDEw062uQgXOJt4oXw7ZH6hrWe/ZzbOfhtuTWugU9Eq0gE +gXQZ/yiQKEHP9qSxIRjC44WImnKR9by7gDog= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pmxRBiSd0Qq+RKljvLAziz14b0HiIh1jKK5ZZmP9ykele42myORAlrepNoBKbkgbf/ JxeF7LP03o/63LPHOR6CoinubkYdGb7lVDx+2etJ/LQCwHtNf/HHy3cA6viSkwx6Anb9 2fIax8S9PAyjzWwurZJUsp5fBiJymibuvBB7c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.110.73.19 with SMTP id v19mr3096907tia.40.1235714158418; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:55:58 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: 1989.gaurav@gmail.com Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:25:58 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Regarding How to start contributing for Hadoop From: gaurav gupta <1989.gaurav@googlemail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65138b674dbdf0463e01f5f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65138b674dbdf0463e01f5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everyone, I am new to FOSS and I wan to start contributing in hadoop. I came across a project "hadoop-talend-integration" which was in list of ideas proposed for GSOC-2008. I wan to know what is the basic requirement and how should I start for this project. Can anyone mentor me for this project so i can start contributing in Hadoop. Waiting for reply. Your's sincerely, GAURAV GUPTA B.Tech III Yr. , Department of Computer Science & Engineering IT BHU , Varanasi Contacts Phone No: +91-99569-49491 e-mail : gaurav.gupta@acm.org gaurav.gupta.cse06@itbhu.ac.in --0016e65138b674dbdf0463e01f5f-- From general-return-133-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 27 07:26:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34401 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2009 07:26:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2009 07:26:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8783 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 07:25:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8738 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 07:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8717 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2009 07:25:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:25:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:25:45 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.195] (snvvpn1-10-72-72-c3.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.72.3]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n1R7OvNN024242; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:24:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=RF6xUQw0hxYIPCuVi0aymW3HCuVsIq9Cu3tN6Mx7uyTqN4zcRiM40R5VeE8D7vVd Cc: Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6a3f6a4b0902250227m10d46683m62f5ed7737ca5f5d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.19.1 available Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:24:57 -0800 References: <6a3f6a4b0902250227m10d46683m62f5ed7737ca5f5d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry for delay. Should now be fixed. Please confirm. Thx, Nige On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:27 AM, Aviad sela wrote: > Nigel, > The SVN tag http://svn.apach.org/repos/asf/core/tags/release-0.19.1 > include > also the branch folder branch-0.19 > which results with double size project which is not necessary. > > I need to use this release to apply patch HADOOP-4546 ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel > ) > I don't know how the above branch folder should contribute when > building the > new eclipse project. > > Isn't it going to be correct to remove this branch folder from the > release > tag ? > > Thanks, > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Nigel Daley > wrote: > >> Release 0.19.1 fixes many critical bugs in 0.19.0, including >> ***some data >> loss issues***. The release also introduces an ***incompatible >> change*** by >> disabling the file append API (HADOOP-5224) until it can be >> stabilized. >> >> For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: >> http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html >> >> Hadoop 0.19.1 Release Notes are at >> http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.19.1/releasenotes.html >> >> Thanks to all who contributed to this release! >> >> Nigel >> >> >> >> From general-return-134-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Feb 27 17:26:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6795 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2009 17:26:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2009 17:26:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 81166 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 17:26:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81139 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 17:26:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81128 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2009 17:26:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:26:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:26:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (snvvpn2-10-72-76-c28.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.28]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n1RHPm6d095441 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:25:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=FfnGizAn4OUlhBP/MYrxWgVptjuTHHsRDkiE7H0IAHPuu4OGKkTYEfAGpU9TMrAM Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Chukwa as subproject Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:25:48 -0800 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'd like to propose Chukwa as a new Hadoop subproject. It is > currently in Hadoop Core's contrib directory. The initial committers > will be: Eric Yang, and Ari Rabkin. Clearly, I'm +1. Chukwa is still > a new project and both of the committers are new, so it will still > need some hand-holding, but I think it is moving fast enough that it > should be on its own. > +1 Arun From general-return-1-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 19 07:34:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 78653 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2008 07:34:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2008 07:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 57809 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2008 07:34:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57775 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2008 07:34:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56433 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2008 07:31:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of afro.systems@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.183 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=80QkXLWP+32unRBHbGtltTjgyrXicF2lcaA6mOgf4p8=; b=OOpRPakNlmTUEYheb4gH/Ab8lPZCaF4Y0pcBA/vihu/DE9+THs0LVu9QSlFsxkthIg bYHJn/vypeavhZLzEG9ZjMlIlwK3eK9hwSMU3B+gpvrgItbC10IgfiMwgu9OTRHvqlWI jvgK4u8XzSc3R2GkNYyXkaUWycwJI4v5/bPPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :x-google-sender-auth; b=CM3tpaUfF1SKn5nh5nDK5dLB4RRJzjKUse6LsgPA2pw+dVnUPweDhO4GWPz9uUIgRp 8iuqfbImVMo24BRPXVAxQ5obSdjeyv8zb4rKlkw6sed3LxwWH+QTzwQhivuCgrhot0cd 70DAshh2gjE6cZ0//mygAMaXaEAiomnfMu4tQ= Message-ID: <2f5ea7490806190031n7b030d85u4a3871977211f335@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:31:27 +0300 From: "Tzury Bar Yochay" Sender: afro.systems@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: hdfs appending writes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3215_31766083.1213860687414" X-Google-Sender-Auth: c9d0ea83a551901f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3215_31766083.1213860687414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, quoting from the documentation at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_design.html Simple Coherency Model HDFS applications need a write-once-read-many access model for files. A file once created, written, and closed need not be changed. This assumption simplifies data coherency issues and enables high throughput data access. A MapReduce application or a web crawler application fits perfectly with this model. There is a plan to support appending-writes to files in the future. I was wondering whether this plan ever implemented. appending-writes are must in my application. and reliable,searchable and mapreduable distributed system is a must as well. thus I looked at hadoop thinking it might be the right platform for the project. -- Tzury Bar Yochay ------=_Part_3215_31766083.1213860687414-- From general-return-2-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 19 07:41:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 80689 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2008 07:41:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2008 07:41:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 64145 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2008 07:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64131 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2008 07:41:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64120 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2008 07:41:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:41:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.191] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.128.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:40:51 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so656800fkx.13 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=o0T3x8lRqcVA5ZpxJFJpw3agyhkYpR+RU5Urd9rcpvI=; b=rLLCUwBs7ya5HpwxV9iCy3Wi0enEo/61rR5I+S1pTXN2jWsvVz+8kEQCr9OMzSAWZ1 69EMoJX5MooToyyY+1GVIuAieDHlrdzGXYQRxBkSY2895EzBjPCySX3AKRO4j/f7vJs4 2v7u0UNZoqd9mB8PKufPINEh9D3IJMBct2rMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JCWNDh6vlKN7x5j4xuvNzpxgvUrYKXWFZuVTHEtbLjbkD74F5KrE8LhZqJcBATTn29 5yhEa7eHl4qoRsbhQ55bUGDqniHDd9/io6ULTs9EPgxsQ/kcgvpYF/jgPPN4kMNHqBIl r/XZ/n7DUflJHDNS/qOLBewbXvUuSTwrDmHRQ= Received: by 10.82.126.1 with SMTP id y1mr104009buc.20.1213861268427; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.178.17 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aa34eb70806190041k2669796i170faeb9030382b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:41:08 -0700 From: "Dhruba Borthakur" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: hdfs appending writes In-Reply-To: <2f5ea7490806190031n7b030d85u4a3871977211f335@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f5ea7490806190031n7b030d85u4a3871977211f335@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The "append" feature is being worked on. It will probably get into the 0.19 release. details here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1700 thanks, dhruba On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Tzury Bar Yochay wrote: > Hi, > > quoting from the documentation at > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_design.html > > Simple Coherency Model > > HDFS applications need a write-once-read-many access model for files. A file > once created, written, and closed need not be changed. This assumption > simplifies data coherency issues and enables high throughput data access. A > MapReduce application or a web crawler application fits perfectly with this > model. There is a plan to support appending-writes to files in the future. > > > I was wondering whether this plan ever implemented. > > appending-writes are must in my application. and reliable,searchable and > mapreduable distributed system is a must as well. > thus I looked at hadoop thinking it might be the right platform for the > project. > > -- > Tzury Bar Yochay > From general-return-561-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 07:48:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56796 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 07:48:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 07:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 19723 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 07:48:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19658 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 07:48:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19648 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 07:48:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:48:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [140.203.201.100] (HELO mx1.nuigalway.ie) (140.203.201.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:47:58 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEANr6w0oKhJ0L/2dsb2JhbACPQccThCgE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,486,1249254000"; d="scan'208";a="37864496" Received: from unknown (HELO EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie) ([10.132.157.11]) by mx1.nuigalway.ie with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2009 08:47:38 +0100 Received: from EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie ([10.132.157.14]) by EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:47:37 +0100 Received: from [10.2.18.121] ([140.203.154.11]) by EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:47:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4AC45E97.20409@deri.org> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:47:35 +0100 From: stephen mulcahy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HBase configuration... References: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2009 07:47:37.0766 (UTC) FILETIME=[72285460:01CA426B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I could be way off the mark here - but if you are running HBase on top of Hadoop in the default configuration then it may be using /tmp for HDFS. This gets wiped on reboot which would cause the problems you are seeing. -stephen stack wrote: > Shut it down cleanly (./bin/stop-hbase.sh). My guess is that you are > killing it before it has chance to flush its in-memory state. > > HBase questions will get more timely response if posted to the hbase lists > (see hbase.org). > > Yours, > St.Ack St.Ack > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Something Something > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I noticed that if I start HBase in "standalone" mode it creates a table in >> memory. In other words, after rebooting the machine, the table goes away. >> I would like to persist the table to a local file system. How can I do >> that? Do I have to use "Psuedo Distribution" mode for this? >> >> Please help. Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> > -- Stephen Mulcahy, DI2, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, NUI Galway, IDA Business Park, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland http://di2.deri.ie http://webstar.deri.ie http://sindice.com From general-return-562-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 07:52:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58129 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 07:52:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 07:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 26016 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 07:52:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25960 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 07:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25950 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 07:52:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:52:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:52:45 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so3846271yxe.2 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:52:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nanE5e/+1KUXTDDXi7c5HicA50qwm5ysmS7htPfvrnE=; b=b7JjLeCBU3L+Ymz8h7nT8VNe3DyVmUO2cvIEZXH1FDQq/FupeOzJnYFUTJMUQ1frzF WYcb5z2mMJDJIKPWv6lF+J6KwjYXwwfn3f+SLvUn+8n0No2XMNh6+sfxPfr5frJ9N7ka Mf2qoo73J898Y8dZ4gYrkL1pYbUmuuW6ErQds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=udvr78CPTH88ecZGrdXu6CuU0wqIvQ+n6miQaKOyt9zXwew7F2nCiCfNA+E+Zs3blM EAP8nvtL5eFI2uHGKsncasHDfvLEleNayOT1gWkVqSJ14CZB/2sw2T1jq3mgfPiQM04r 1/E8TGJu8/GKO3g+fduf/fy1AADo2MiPLb3ug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.141.2 with SMTP id o2mr1736803ybd.49.1254383544195; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:52:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC45E97.20409@deri.org> References: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> <4AC45E97.20409@deri.org> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 00:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910010052gb67910am3b9c4e183eac0deb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HBase configuration... From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org yes, the standalone version uses file:///tmp to store data, to allow people to get up and running without HDFS. And you are exactly correct, with /tmp being cleaned on reboot on many distros. Grep for /tmp in hbase-default.xml to find the setting. -ryan On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:47 AM, stephen mulcahy wrote: > Hi, > > I could be way off the mark here - but if you are running HBase on top of > Hadoop in the default configuration then it may be using /tmp for HDFS. T= his > gets wiped on reboot which would cause the problems you are seeing. > > -stephen > > stack wrote: >> >> Shut it down cleanly (./bin/stop-hbase.sh). =A0My guess is that you are >> killing it before it has chance to flush its in-memory state. >> >> HBase questions will get more timely response if posted to the hbase lis= ts >> (see hbase.org). >> >> Yours, >> St.Ack St.Ack >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Something Something >> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I noticed that if I start HBase in "standalone" mode it creates a table >>> in >>> memory. =A0In other words, after rebooting the machine, the table goes >>> away. >>> I would like to persist the table to a local file system. =A0How can I = do >>> that? =A0Do I have to use "Psuedo Distribution" mode for this? >>> >>> Please help. =A0Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Stephen Mulcahy, DI2, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, > NUI Galway, IDA Business Park, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland > http://di2.deri.ie =A0 =A0http://webstar.deri.ie =A0 =A0http://sindice.co= m > From general-return-563-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 08:06:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62244 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 08:06:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 08:06:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 49276 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 08:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49202 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 08:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49192 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 08:06:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [140.203.201.100] (HELO mx1.nuigalway.ie) (140.203.201.100) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:05:58 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAE7/w0oKhJ0L/2dsb2JhbADWVIQoBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,486,1249254000"; d="scan'208";a="37872480" Received: from unknown (HELO EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie) ([10.132.157.11]) by mx1.nuigalway.ie with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2009 09:05:38 +0100 Received: from EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie ([10.132.157.14]) by EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:05:37 +0100 Received: from [10.2.18.121] ([140.203.154.11]) by EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:05:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4AC462CF.70806@deri.org> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:05:35 +0100 From: stephen mulcahy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HBase configuration... References: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> <4AC45E97.20409@deri.org> <78568af10910010052gb67910am3b9c4e183eac0deb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78568af10910010052gb67910am3b9c4e183eac0deb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2009 08:05:37.0497 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5BA3490:01CA426D] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan Rawson wrote: > yes, the standalone version uses file:///tmp to store data, to allow > people to get up and running without HDFS. And you are exactly > correct, with /tmp being cleaned on reboot on many distros. Grep for > /tmp in hbase-default.xml to find the setting. Would it be better to default this directory to /var/tmp which would achieve the same goal of allowing people to quickly get up and running but might avoid some of the confusion of their HDFS disappearing on reboot (speaking as one recently confused in such a manner ;) -stephen -- Stephen Mulcahy, DI2, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, NUI Galway, IDA Business Park, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland http://di2.deri.ie http://webstar.deri.ie http://sindice.com From general-return-564-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 08:14:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64028 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 08:14:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 08:14:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 57613 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 08:14:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57539 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 08:14:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57529 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 08:14:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:14:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:14:23 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so3858231yxe.2 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:14:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o5/JTevH3QttvxEd1ZwmuzonBxUUG7B4MeBaUoGhDNI=; b=rVhuPnEjlkQ0wCy1yeWP8BOZsJa8rBkaxGQ6PFUVzUd51/T7EuFLjeThRgNVv84IZw U8BqnHZ68NF/Hz22Deyla41eQCmXdLZ1OuRn3t+EkCRFKMLM6PMPcvj2hJkFqM/XKZG+ j0kB5Hfx6trpd+8XuFKHisBxmge2N9sLQVpPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j5RHsi6o0VwJyYuKTHIN1pzUN9W31+yVl+kRvIL0fIHr02Ew/w4VPJ+p/tlgdiiq5m 1o10zlV64+afHDZ7dCsaIN09lFCZ67EAFuVIx1yaQJRt81twPHwcqa0gCfyRHX7NA4dm TeH6F0/OswoeYW09AflwpXBXQ3cgKiuPsJztI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.130.39 with SMTP id c39mr1683738ybd.338.1254384842999; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:14:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC462CF.70806@deri.org> References: <440561.64930.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <7c962aed0909301442g57a7b4ceg62a84ccb0ff22102@mail.gmail.com> <4AC45E97.20409@deri.org> <78568af10910010052gb67910am3b9c4e183eac0deb@mail.gmail.com> <4AC462CF.70806@deri.org> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 01:14:02 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910010114m12e9dff8ve17c22351b788934@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HBase configuration... From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That seems reasonable, although the nice thing about /tmp is how universal it is :-) On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:05 AM, stephen mulcahy wrote: > Ryan Rawson wrote: >> >> yes, the standalone version uses file:///tmp to store data, to allow >> people to get up and running without HDFS. =A0And you are exactly >> correct, with /tmp being cleaned on reboot on many distros. =A0Grep for >> /tmp in hbase-default.xml to find the setting. > > Would it be better to default this directory to /var/tmp which would achi= eve > the same goal of allowing people to quickly get up and running but might > avoid some of the confusion of their HDFS disappearing on reboot (speakin= g > as one recently confused in such a manner ;) > > -stephen > > -- > Stephen Mulcahy, DI2, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, > NUI Galway, IDA Business Park, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland > http://di2.deri.ie =A0 =A0http://webstar.deri.ie =A0 =A0http://sindice.co= m > From general-return-565-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 17:50:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87299 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 17:50:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 17:50:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 18891 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 17:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18836 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 17:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18826 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 17:50:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.145.54.172 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of phunt@apache.org) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:50:04 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.251] (wifi-e-135-251.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.135.251]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n91HlwP8088140; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AC4EB4E.4030708@apache.org> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:47:58 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: question on slf4j and Hadoop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was watching this recently, it's very interesting: http://www.java-tv.com/2009/09/24/slf4j-and-logback-projects/ slf4j has some very nice properties, not the least that it solves some problems like simplifying integration of apps that use different logging systems. I had noticed that Avro uses slf4j, and that Hadoop in general has it as part of the ivy config (although the code is still log4j based). Is the intent to move all of Hadoop to slf4j over time? Patrick From general-return-566-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 01 20:00:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40180 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 20:00:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 20:00:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 21198 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 20:00:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21106 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 20:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21091 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 20:00:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.222] (HELO mail-fx0-f222.google.com) (209.85.220.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:00:30 +0000 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so495949fxm.36 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:00:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=wpb6bAlHPHQrVDJ5Cf05PDKEg4aUyeBC8/JVcufzxlc=; b=EI28otesQ7oNzRR2JosuKjq2r+0g38mjsCZ//ygb9pnCJwY1Z7W3JPZ0btDbcOlBhE O6UxtKJONkCx9Mq4wJ2IV3mog5Fu+W9hC9CirTEi0V7UGXB1w5OzQ9oW9PgiV+9At8ur 2gd78pGoPT5mhE5GhmJu4zpzqJpcOaZaRGjSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iplu/J/1vMIsLC1lMyiHgrXHnjLTva4sKyKxVrAeRko4PUGYQCh9tLlFcmOVCdslFx 9/idTi16XgWb5hXYnP8kNgTfCKGlEtACyam9V2lMG50BnYQgI1W3ZskNpGilcZfbuTF6 WNkorFQu3FVxxQWYO9Hf7Ovahc4BauywCXRHE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.76.5 with SMTP id d5mr587872mul.131.1254427209671; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:00:09 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00910011300o14702a51h2422ad9397eec34d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: CHANGING FINAL OUTPUT FILE NAME From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65aeee83aa5000474e518b3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e65aeee83aa5000474e518b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! I have a newbie question: I=B4m actually using Hadoop 0.20.1 a= nd I=B4d like to know how can I change the name of the resulting file with the one I want (i.e from "part-r-00000" to "myoutput"). I=B4ve found something related in JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-370) but I don=B4t know for sure i that is my problem too. In this case, do I apply th= e patch over the affected file and I=B4m ready to go or do I need to do something more later? Thanks a lot! --=20 Alberto --0016e65aeee83aa5000474e518b3-- From general-return-567-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 01:05:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47188 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 01:05:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 01:05:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 66731 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 01:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66660 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 01:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66650 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 01:05:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:05:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.198] (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:05:26 +0000 Received: by vws36 with SMTP id 36so375636vws.29 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:05:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aAKNQ+ApbLKxXHmPKZRzrWQvqNd/4tj6zkq/ZJpAwvU=; b=hzpRxC1Td8LC5sQbetgl1urIThAAQcCnMaa9jK2npdH400YuKaRdiLSOxUhrNH+MLJ dhjd73odr+M/dGKBuQQpYP8+0F+AHEjXdBbEeWSKgwkfKlJNapwEoyIEc7Qp0sVK/JUu e0nJDCImDnLuhAkeIet2lsf4dvBttUm8iO+4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uYKYP9BgjXJsUT+quO3iHmsZb3IqE2dyf8BSapn++pxA2o4TxpeV8D32ZPnqWIN/kz V+yR19EK3aD89lElnXBhb0W/BHgYfLOuSktzO1MULqkRWwaoU6VJSz5diEfVkeqjl2kF XBj6vp/GXNER9hjlE3mCruXZ/QkNLw9XLLEls= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.69.169 with SMTP id z41mr3569245vci.31.1254445504654; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:05:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <309f76d00910011300o14702a51h2422ad9397eec34d@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00910011300o14702a51h2422ad9397eec34d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:05:04 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910011805v5b0c9246q221cd51695d7b6e8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CHANGING FINAL OUTPUT FILE NAME From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6475626b1ed620474e95ae1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6475626b1ed620474e95ae1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see these ways to go here. 1. The one I know to work is to create a recordwriter in the configure method of your task, in the per task work/output directory, and then ren= ame it to your chosen name in the close. your task calls write on the recordwriter directly instead of output.collect 2. Use the multi output format 3. in the close method of the task, rename the part-xxx to your name. I am not certain that this is safe in the close method of the task 4. define a custom OutputCommitter class which renames the file to your chosen name. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas wrote: > Hi everyone! I have a newbie question: I=B4m actually using Hadoop 0.20.1= and > I=B4d like to know how can I change the name of the resulting file with t= he > one I want (i.e from "part-r-00000" to "myoutput"). I=B4ve found somethin= g > related in JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-370) but > I > don=B4t know for sure i that is my problem too. In this case, do I apply = the > patch over the affected file and I=B4m ready to go or do I need to do > something more later? > Thanks a lot! > > -- > Alberto > --=20 Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --0016e6475626b1ed620474e95ae1-- From general-return-568-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 07:50:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34581 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 07:50:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 07:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8138 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 07:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8076 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 07:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8066 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 07:50:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:50:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:49:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636CA1BA448 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:49:27 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Mfn6Cq74t2Cj for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:49:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6BF1BA2F2 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:49:26 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1255074554.29463@yzWtbVzO16YiKIWarRUKIw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n927nC7d003412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:49:13 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4AC5B078.30601@apache.org> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:49:12 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: question on slf4j and Hadoop References: <4AC4EB4E.4030708@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AC4EB4E.4030708@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n927nC7d003412 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Patrick Hunt wrote: > I was watching this recently, it's very interesting: > http://www.java-tv.com/2009/09/24/slf4j-and-logback-projects/ > slf4j has some very nice properties, not the least that it solves some > problems like simplifying integration of apps that use different logging > systems. > > I had noticed that Avro uses slf4j, and that Hadoop in general has it as > part of the ivy config (although the code is still log4j based). Is the > intent to move all of Hadoop to slf4j over time? > > Patrick SLF4J is there because jetty uses it. If it had stayed with commons-logging it would be that much easier to run different logging back ends, as it is I have to have two different bridge libraries to integrate hadoop logging with where the data goes in my clusters. From general-return-569-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 08:15:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43003 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 08:15:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 08:15:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 40246 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40173 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40163 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 08:15:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:15:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:14:51 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so737112bwz.29 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:14:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GQVzeXTE34JVg+p+afkiBpmAurSTP6Tz/GYqNMHWTok=; b=ikqRT8XEnTuBqpq0EV27NaoWXWDkaB2/0dqgqgumGlqsm94zIUWpf5qXMK7c7WfD2k Xi5aXHEKPsqchRONtcDUq5vKAgZNNz2aWP5Xc80x8xbvn+i/jisdwo+YDEk4kANyMa1O G0rLiaLQv45ssk93IxNAi5r0B6Nbxyrb3u96A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MmvdTO32nsrzdNhMRR5x0Ai2NS+ReclIUijYzBx4Hr5udH0VESA/FJM8t8Jhd4QYDz RA/cY/d/a7adPd18S5TVaR3AV7rce5wan1MBbp/X9FC0gAAWhhfqKph6dP3KtAnnXwwb Zz1tBm6vonReF09WqMjZAzg5xAaFwnb9m5Ivc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr849822muf.129.1254471270575; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:14:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690910011805v5b0c9246q221cd51695d7b6e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00910011300o14702a51h2422ad9397eec34d@mail.gmail.com> <314098690910011805v5b0c9246q221cd51695d7b6e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:14:30 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00910020114j6ca5979ag7dd20b26e586cbe0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CHANGING FINAL OUTPUT FILE NAME From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641797d76adae0474ef5a2f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163641797d76adae0474ef5a2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the reply Jason. I=B4ll try these solutions. 2009/10/2 Jason Venner > I see these ways to go here. > > 1. The one I know to work is to create a recordwriter in the configure > method of your task, in the per task work/output directory, and then > rename > it to your chosen name in the close. your task calls write on the > recordwriter directly instead of output.collect > 2. Use the multi output format > 3. in the close method of the task, rename the part-xxx to your name. I > am not certain that this is safe in the close method of the task > 4. define a custom OutputCommitter class which renames the file to your > chosen name. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone! I have a newbie question: I=B4m actually using Hadoop 0.20= .1 > and > > I=B4d like to know how can I change the name of the resulting file with= the > > one I want (i.e from "part-r-00000" to "myoutput"). I=B4ve found someth= ing > > related in JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-370) > but > > I > > don=B4t know for sure i that is my problem too. In this case, do I appl= y > the > > patch over the affected file and I=B4m ready to go or do I need to do > > something more later? > > Thanks a lot! > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > --=20 Alberto --00163641797d76adae0474ef5a2f-- From general-return-570-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 08:28:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45519 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 08:28:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 08:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 57017 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 08:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56934 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 08:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56924 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 08:28:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:28:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:28:20 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so744755bwz.29 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uIvl9EtltiKZ4mprJiUbuGhe3kK6oD32MoBk1/cwweE=; b=vZ+kG5lsyCInlPJK0TODz3NV0fxxin6JCYMhzsNFH+XZA/8aec7PBv1tBEXNXMfw9o CNxw/L9iBHNhmKMQaa/wM5AId3tgCmILQDfcK2dfVWHPMPjw/asd89pig3zQVBO5fqaa giKOMnyY85sD0YbZzdZtIaHIOU79pNVH+WrNw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mG6sqDkq5/VTfAYA7SHNSvmtpQL39+xgZLLP+G/r9sxFjCoxyhrz1tlNeGmpE7pg1o v5BOBozmsP6GcUeA7vS0ZQotYtN8UZGA7AS1GZRY8oDZuXlbgk1XZRjXojUgdWoCo5Rk aNHqyZWbu65ysq7Ojn4mgmu1RRKeXymHUOpyo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.202 with SMTP id c10mr682286fai.73.1254472079429; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:27:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AC5B078.30601@apache.org> References: <4AC4EB4E.4030708@apache.org> <4AC5B078.30601@apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:27:59 +0200 Message-ID: <32120a6a0910020127p7703e695l1882c3e6274a08b9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: question on slf4j and Hadoop From: tim robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I could be wrong on this, but something to take into account with slf4j... I have seen a few projects that logged a custom MessageObject which different appenders do differing things with. E.g. a file appender will toString() it, but a custom DB appender might use the object properties and a prepared statement. I believe slf4j will call the toString() before it reachers your appenders so it breaks this functionality. Disclaimer: I really may be wrong, but I certainly saw this behavior and reverted to commons logging on those projects, and it could be that slf4j now respects the original method signatures are (e.g.) log.info(Object) and not log.info(String) On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Patrick Hunt wrote: >> >> I was watching this recently, it's very interesting: >> http://www.java-tv.com/2009/09/24/slf4j-and-logback-projects/ >> slf4j has some very nice properties, not the least that it solves some >> problems like simplifying integration of apps that use different logging >> systems. >> >> I had noticed that Avro uses slf4j, and that Hadoop in general has it as >> part of the ivy config (although the code is still log4j based). Is the >> intent to move all of Hadoop to slf4j over time? >> >> Patrick > > SLF4J is there because jetty uses it. If it had stayed with commons-logging > it would be that much easier to run different logging back ends, as it is I > have to have two different bridge libraries to integrate hadoop logging with > where the data goes in my clusters. > From general-return-571-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 15:27:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70920 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 15:27:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 15:27:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 32980 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 15:27:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32895 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 15:27:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32885 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 15:27:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:27:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:27:33 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so1066836bwz.29 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XcDiQ47gXpu2jwB9D6a8Hl3JjmAg1dLvwtFaIbM42rA=; b=jodj9JBPSOH4oFqJdSCHKeQG3XWo2fSbXnZl9QmRIkhbO+ZJB3jA8wdp5xLlVUlc88 mtac+NuH8ef3JxhxuO0IXLfr9vvVmoo6gbDLQrnWcjU3ENWuY9YsfxyOBpwT0NhKAmJU 9ZIJw8g+3/GPLnjUHn++JQmBOIw6lSGKGT1EE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T+zD6AcFYZFVCjYaQqk7MiwxYHT0eVKwU2XhTQfzl3NkbklnLx170dx1LAac1iOwQE pzmHy8GPratexMmF7ZIbsu2Cvuoq+38Yy6qFZirvhOBQJPSr+R/OOybwj/ilqzlegHd9 YHE9PD7EkVTcu/kePy9wtL7DsKU+dJKt+Dvyk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr1045632muf.129.1254497232751; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:27:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690910011805v5b0c9246q221cd51695d7b6e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00910011300o14702a51h2422ad9397eec34d@mail.gmail.com> <314098690910011805v5b0c9246q221cd51695d7b6e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:27:12 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00910020827h6f8214fdv4a2166d35ab58f0a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CHANGING FINAL OUTPUT FILE NAME From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641797dee0b300474f5653a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163641797dee0b300474f5653a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again! I=B4ve been trying to apply the first of the solutions Jason proposed two mails ago, but I have some questions about it: 1.-In Hadoop 0.20.1 "RecordWriter" is an abstract class, so it can=B4t be instantiated. 2.- The "configure" and "close" methods of my task you refer are the "configure" and "close" methods used in the Reducer? It would help a lot if you=B4d put some code instructions (only the ones reffering to this issue) so I can have a better point of view. Finally, I=B4d like to show my close method in my reducer class, because I = use a different approach and I can=B4t see why it fails: *@Override protected void cleanup(Context cont) throws IOException { //write output to a file Configuration conf =3D new Configuration(); JobContext jCont =3D new JobContext(conf, null); FileSystem fs =3D FileSystem.get(jCont.getConfiguration()); Path outDir =3D new Path("/user/hadoop-user/output", "output"); Path outFile =3D new Path(outDir, "reduce-out"); SequenceFile.Writer writer =3D SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, conf, outFile, LongWritable.class, LongWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); writer.append(new Text(keyword), new IntWritable(fitnessValue)); writer.close(); } * Thanks a lot in advance! 2009/10/2 Jason Venner > I see these ways to go here. > > 1. The one I know to work is to create a recordwriter in the configure > method of your task, in the per task work/output directory, and then > rename > it to your chosen name in the close. your task calls write on the > recordwriter directly instead of output.collect > 2. Use the multi output format > 3. in the close method of the task, rename the part-xxx to your name. I > am not certain that this is safe in the close method of the task > 4. define a custom OutputCommitter class which renames the file to your > chosen name. > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < > cabiwan@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone! I have a newbie question: I=B4m actually using Hadoop 0.20= .1 > and > > I=B4d like to know how can I change the name of the resulting file with= the > > one I want (i.e from "part-r-00000" to "myoutput"). I=B4ve found someth= ing > > related in JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-370) > but > > I > > don=B4t know for sure i that is my problem too. In this case, do I appl= y > the > > patch over the affected file and I=B4m ready to go or do I need to do > > something more later? > > Thanks a lot! > > > > -- > > Alberto > > > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > --=20 Alberto --00163641797dee0b300474f5653a-- From general-return-572-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 02 21:41:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90023 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2009 21:41:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2009 21:41:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 98297 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98145 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98062 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2009 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:41:35 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n92Lf5ix040365; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:41:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=RvzyT/WRwZ4WSSNMMeCWhZWBrjUrYP7suZW8q8y8nZOwUi934HqPkTvPYHjSiE4L Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:41:08 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:41:05 -0700 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Oct 21st at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Oct 21st at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCEZs4pA= Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD376F380@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, RSVP is now open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yah= oo! Sunnyvale Campus, planed for Oct 21st. Registration is available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11532125/ We would be interested to explore additional Hadoop and/or related technolo= gies use-cases like Ken provided us in the last event (thank you Ken, very = impressive!) allowing all of us to learn from each other. If you are interested to present, please send me an email with a short desc= ription. Looking forward to seeing you at Oct 21st Dekel From general-return-573-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 04 10:21:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61339 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2009 10:21:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2009 10:21:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 27090 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 10:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27015 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 10:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27005 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2009 10:21:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:21:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:21:24 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so2530145yxe.5 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.102.16 with SMTP id e16mr4440427anm.84.1254651602266; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690909272130n4f22e636re90a067e47caffa2@mail.gmail.com> References: <4abc7bbb.05035a0a.55c7.ffffd84c@mx.google.com> <314098690909272130n4f22e636re90a067e47caffa2@mail.gmail.com> From: Chandan Tamrakar Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:04:42 +0545 Message-ID: <95f8b1a90910040319o3bdf0ca2j705a504edaa71588@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Integrating Lucene in Hadoop To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed706311eaaf04751957f8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636ed706311eaaf04751957f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanks jason In my case lucene indexes needs to be accessed thru .net code ( simple search interfaces) so should I use solr-1301 patch to index the documents and then move the indexes from HDFS to Local file system so that .net interface could access and query the indexes directly ? Will this be a better approach ? alternatively we might need some sort of web service that could read/query from index in hdfs and would be called by .net front end UI. will very much appreciate the suggestions thanks On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jason Venner wrote: > Katta is a tool for managing distributed search, which happens by default > to > use lucene as it' search engine. > Katta is able to read indexes from hdfs, or s3, that katta then deploys > onto > the local disk of the katta nodes. > > The contrib directory of the hadoop installation contains a tool for > building lucene indexes, and patch solr-1395, provides an integration of > solr with katta, and patch solr-1301 provides a simple way of building solr > indexes in hadoop (as a parallel to the contrib lucene index build tool). > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > I was doing few R&D on integrating hadoop and Lucene . I could create > > lucene indexes into HDFS using index contribution provided for Hadoop > > > > > > > > Is this a proper way to create Lucene index how much it is different from > a > > project KATTA ? > > > > > > > > Please suggest what would be the better approach to create distributed > > lucene indexes > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > -- Chandan Tamrakar --001636ed706311eaaf04751957f8-- From general-return-574-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 04 11:20:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68411 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2009 11:20:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2009 11:20:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 56509 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 11:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56427 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 11:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56417 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2009 11:20:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:20:00 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2606922pzk.2 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.253.23 with SMTP id a23mr6970885wai.155.1254655179546; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nsf264fa356e37 ([124.41.206.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1899034pzk.8.2009.10.04.04.19.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chandan Tamrakar" To: Subject: katta and hadoop index contrib Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:04:18 +0545 Message-ID: <4ac884cb.9713f30a.3f10.ffff9c65@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpE5INtMBUYiVxMTsSECZRm1EyVEQ== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was using the hadoop.contrib.index code and was able to make a distributed Lucene index Could then search over that index while it is still in hdfs Does the Katta project uses same hadoop index-contrib to index the documents ? I found that there are also contributions solr-1395 and solr-1301 ( solr -hadoop ) what would be the best approach to begin with Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60-- From general-return-575-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 04 11:28:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69696 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2009 11:28:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2009 11:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 60771 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 11:28:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60704 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2009 11:28:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60692 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2009 11:28:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:28:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.197] (HELO mail-px0-f197.google.com) (209.85.216.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:28:07 +0000 Received: by pxi35 with SMTP id 35so2353070pxi.2 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.253.23 with SMTP id a23mr6970885wai.155.1254655179546; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nsf264fa356e37 ([124.41.206.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm1899034pzk.8.2009.10.04.04.19.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:19:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chandan Tamrakar" To: Subject: katta and hadoop index contrib Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 17:04:18 +0545 Message-ID: <4ac884cb.9713f30a.3f10.ffff9c65@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpE5INtMBUYiVxMTsSECZRm1EyVEQ== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was using the hadoop.contrib.index code and was able to make a distributed Lucene index Could then search over that index while it is still in hdfs Does the Katta project uses same hadoop index-contrib to index the documents ? I found that there are also contributions solr-1395 and solr-1301 ( solr -hadoop ) what would be the best approach to begin with Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01CA4514.B8813B60-- From general-return-576-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 03:48:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52961 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 03:48:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 03:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 67049 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 03:48:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66924 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 03:48:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66914 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 03:48:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:48:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.198] (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:48:42 +0000 Received: by vws36 with SMTP id 36so1567126vws.29 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:47:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lUU6qXjxvs+3p6p+PL9Xz/NtvPsNKXueTBwOcvWZwJs=; b=QorQh0hw3Id1uf0b4ent35FfKbBh+5W8DNuFD43h1PA99FEM6R2y5q9LFSh4181QAc oK2rdZ7qZEzVQToVRKSgoOYCono8hifHg2GVYNuEju2p0/3ojAU7kPyDIwZPusafs/PR XqcpqFW5koNos7JPGVtka+0B+bZ6HyKIH3Qgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Npl48W7CT3lveSGvxLQLPHUr8aRuJZ1sEHBaOjIOrhcW9YePhFt6jz9nRe0c2LeBb9 k7zyt2JmpD5BCw3EzlMDfnAw8o2HU3IfLpSCFPaPVtXGlCNE7I+lRiZcznR8biO/xm6K /WmroJ8Co4EM3CPtPGFlU0umPhZ0pa9NzCuos= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.69.169 with SMTP id z41mr8994574vci.31.1254714441368; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:47:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ac884cb.9713f30a.3f10.ffff9c65@mx.google.com> References: <4ac884cb.9713f30a.3f10.ffff9c65@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:47:21 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910042047r79355f3ewc0b140a8b524ee64@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: katta and hadoop index contrib From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64756269285ea047527f857 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64756269285ea047527f857 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Currently Katta, will pull the index out of HDFS and deploy it on local disk. HDFS is not known for low latency random access, and index lookups generally require low latency random access. I seem to remember that someone had a patch that allowed lucene to directly access files in hdfs for the index, for readon ly access, but I do not remember the reference. On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > I was using the hadoop.contrib.index code and was able to make a > distributed Lucene index > > Could then search over that index while it is still in hdfs > > > > Does the Katta project uses same hadoop index-contrib to index the > documents ? > > > > I found that there are also contributions solr-1395 and solr-1301 ( solr > -hadoop ) what would be the best approach to begin with > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --0016e64756269285ea047527f857-- From general-return-577-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 03:49:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53150 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 03:49:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 03:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 67692 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 03:49:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67602 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 03:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67592 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 03:49:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:49:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.198] (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:49:32 +0000 Received: by mail-vw0-f198.google.com with SMTP id 36so1567126vws.29 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:49:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uPoQClyPiCy1s92AnhrGjyqNuZWzJnQb2JWNmObyhAM=; b=ud0uxMUvAorrHX6hWW7KSTMGdUiGwe7vx/QLvOdvMak0jnpYLPuUv3yMEwG18PzceC X6mydF5vsCnI55UHrlSeA2GcAPFWfwv6MKP7ZlSifcfuy00ONdVW16UShm8YzEMbbnTE MmAZUgBG+zCJE+JxX3ZicjB3HSYIVjZ8QFDo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bQtxoFxUGgbDzrR1Ig3QR5c6antFwaBucpwOa7/hRba+uDRpamgrib+ynSSa8OTnQ6 I1+827Xb3VAjO4nQuM2zC2OEJvE1z82H9Rh+0NDZgf9rLQxtOAkGYJHlrbaHd6NSJNzf kHGFtZyVc1PPAplyrjUYhbLsSk9ZTzHv0K4ls= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.16.83 with SMTP id n19mr9150666vca.3.1254714551941; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:49:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <95f8b1a90910040319o3bdf0ca2j705a504edaa71588@mail.gmail.com> References: <4abc7bbb.05035a0a.55c7.ffffd84c@mx.google.com> <314098690909272130n4f22e636re90a067e47caffa2@mail.gmail.com> <95f8b1a90910040319o3bdf0ca2j705a504edaa71588@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:49:11 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910042049r2e359ce9v93a86f136fc074b6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Integrating Lucene in Hadoop From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ea86b429b8eb047527fff1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485ea86b429b8eb047527fff1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, solr-1301 builds the solr lucene indexes, it is over kill if you are just using lucene. The contrib index build code with hadoop is sufficient. Moving the indexes to the local file system is the most simple strategy, you could try using fuse to mount hdfs as a local file system, for access as an alternative. On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > thanks jason > > In my case lucene indexes needs to be accessed thru .net code ( simple > search interfaces) > so should I use solr-1301 patch to index the documents and then move the > indexes from HDFS to Local file system so that .net interface could access > and query the indexes directly ? > > Will this be a better approach ? alternatively we might need some sort of > web service that could read/query from index in hdfs and would be called > by > .net front end UI. > > will very much appreciate the suggestions > thanks > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jason Venner >wrote: > > > Katta is a tool for managing distributed search, which happens by default > > to > > use lucene as it' search engine. > > Katta is able to read indexes from hdfs, or s3, that katta then deploys > > onto > > the local disk of the katta nodes. > > > > The contrib directory of the hadoop installation contains a tool for > > building lucene indexes, and patch solr-1395, provides an integration of > > solr with katta, and patch solr-1301 provides a simple way of building > solr > > indexes in hadoop (as a parallel to the contrib lucene index build tool). > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > > > I was doing few R&D on integrating hadoop and Lucene . I could create > > > lucene indexes into HDFS using index contribution provided for Hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this a proper way to create Lucene index how much it is different > from > > a > > > project KATTA ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please suggest what would be the better approach to create distributed > > > lucene indexes > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall > > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > > > > > > -- > Chandan Tamrakar > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --001485ea86b429b8eb047527fff1-- From general-return-578-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 16:44:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37203 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 16:44:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 16:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 61926 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 16:43:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61875 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 16:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61865 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 16:43:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:43:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:43:46 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n95Gf9ki078106 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:41:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=yvBnWdEDiWG2YsUSRvaplW1MwvUmwixhPBldQvY2VvwmA13+ngZmKZxeT5vo/0Mi Message-Id: <52336B40-7CA1-486D-ADF0-1F9B99AB1808@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--571721242 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:41:09 -0700 References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1--571721242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Sanjay Radia wrote: > > Wrt connection pooling/async servers: Can't we use the same > libraries > > that Jetty and Tomcat use? > > Grizzly? > > Grizzly also supports HTTP. Choosing Grizzly is independent of > choosing > HTTP as a wire transport or choosing a server. > Agreed. Hence the main advantages that remain for http transport are 1) language independent spec for the protocol. The message headers will be in avro so that is easy and the message exchange should be fairly straightforward. I see this as a minor advantage for using http transport. 2) code to implement the transport in multiple languages. (2) is a significant advantage. Once we put in the security modifications, will it remain that portable? We should look at that more closely. What about out of order exchange. Will we be able to support that with http transport? sanjay --Apple-Mail-1--571721242-- From general-return-579-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 20:44:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37827 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 20:44:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 87668 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:44:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87591 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87581 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 20:44:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:44:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:44:11 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-32-184.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.32.184]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DD9DC307 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:43:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:43:15 -0400 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit most of those > response headers except Content-Length. Are any others strictly required? Content-Type and Server are probably unavoidable. Some of the others are extremely helpful during development / debugging / etc. It depends on how "open" you are about HTTP being the transport (i.e. do you let developers augment these headers to support additional features, etc.). This may not make sense in the context of something specialized like Avro transport. > I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-129 > > In some simple benchmarks I am able to make over 5000 sequential > RPCs/second, each with ~100 bytes of response payload. Just out of curiousity, were you using HTTP keep alive? During testing on a project a few years ago, I found a huge difference if Keep Alive is supported. In retrospect, that should have been obvious. I'd imagine the usage pattern here would be a large number of repeated calls between the same client / server within a short period of time; perfect for KA. Regards. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-580-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 20:47:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39038 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 20:47:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 20:47:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:47:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92566 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:47:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92556 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 20:47:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:47:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.220] (HELO mail-gx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.217.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:47:23 +0000 Received: by gxk20 with SMTP id 20so3709942gxk.12 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mvCVITG6K641M1Czi5SZdST1zk4U/mw9LpQkxRFEIEo=; b=IM1cNp66Q7LzjcfvD0D8OL7MhoneBellLkqAymI+0NnJLNOwy4SmMsMMlNlZL1mi29 BLgWtaKzGDQjSE8lovb5kKS/jZJ3obW7joxqULYvKZavl7QwomnWyKTSHMDlyYcLqJgO ypnefDTO69slfMwBbtYMy0zMjaIxobWp/n6qE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dfj7NuzWiavI78ilpFxX67016eTt7VfG1+7s5wZoKy6Sr2jMrBFLcB5YVo7zSrcHut RmmKWL73oVVjX2IlqTTFRFIv/i3GXy4uga9bGpdSGlkeuXprekbtRONgGRNko/HwE4WH PBYcDy4S2EnxMDyiKWZMCQyL8V/GE8lMri5cU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.76.7 with SMTP id y7mr764893yba.238.1254775622982; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:47:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:47:02 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd72d9c47dce60475363706 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd72d9c47dce60475363706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have a question about these headers... will they impact the ability to do many, but small, rpcs? Imagine you'd need to support 5,000 to 50,000 rpcs/second. Would this help or hinder? On Oct 5, 2009 4:44 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: Doug Cutting wrote: > More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit most of those > response... Content-Type and Server are probably unavoidable. Some of the others are extremely helpful during development / debugging / etc. It depends on how "open" you are about HTTP being the transport (i.e. do you let developers augment these headers to support additional features, etc.). This may not make sense in the context of something specialized like Avro transport. > I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira... Just out of curiousity, were you using HTTP keep alive? During testing on a project a few years ago, I found a huge difference if Keep Alive is supported. In retrospect, that should have been obvious. I'd imagine the usage pattern here would be a large number of repeated calls between the same client / server within a short period of time; perfect for KA. Regards. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com --000e0cd72d9c47dce60475363706-- From general-return-581-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 20:54:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40485 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 20:54:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 20:54:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6286 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:54:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6221 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:54:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6211 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 20:54:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:54:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:53:55 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-32-184.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.32.184]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4F0DC307 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:53:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4ACA5CCE.3040704@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:53:34 -0400 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan: Certainly keep alive will help in this case, if that's what you're referring to. The server holds the socket for N seconds or M requests, which ever comes first. What you're saving with KA is the connection setup / tear down. If you have a lot of cases where the client makes a single request and goes away, then KA hurts because the server holds the connection for the KA timeout (N seconds). This *really* helps if you're using TLS due to the additional connection setup overhead. It's my opinion and experience that KA helps greatly in the case of many exchanges between a small to medium number of clients and a server such as RPC. The anti-example is an ad server or web beacon server, for instance. Regards. Ryan Rawson wrote: > I have a question about these headers... will they impact the ability to do > many, but small, rpcs? Imagine you'd need to support 5,000 to 50,000 > rpcs/second. Would this help or hinder? > > On Oct 5, 2009 4:44 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: > > Doug Cutting wrote: > More or less. Except we can probably arrange to omit > most of those > response... > Content-Type and Server are probably unavoidable. Some of the others are > extremely helpful during development / debugging / etc. It depends on > how "open" you are about HTTP being the transport (i.e. do you let > developers augment these headers to support additional features, etc.). > This may not make sense in the context of something specialized like > Avro transport. > >> I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira... > Just out of curiousity, were you using HTTP keep alive? During testing > on a project a few years ago, I found a huge difference if Keep Alive is > supported. In retrospect, that should have been obvious. I'd imagine the > usage pattern here would be a large number of repeated calls between the > same client / server within a short period of time; perfect for KA. > > Regards. > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com > -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-582-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 20:57:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42465 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 20:57:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 20:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12635 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12552 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12542 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 20:57:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:57:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.189] (HELO mail-yw0-f189.google.com) (209.85.211.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:57:43 +0000 Received: by ywh27 with SMTP id 27so7184910ywh.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dSmOhCUKi2/rzxv6nuELiNcCjyYvrUXupqIOBkwJ078=; b=iXQU6On+D/NE8Q/XMtrphvJyHuOlVHkLdt7JIQ4utI4TVGpLj4fqnyW8pKPNpO70Qf NGXyGkQJlOAHGTTVGE15tmoaJILJLpXmvjnvLFvtam3/TmZab860pmmcvRegAzdCEFX3 6ttPEoeDGsil6cYkdkE6KfikO3w/2KEHLQoDM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Am9OiOk5Q3KwAMCPzSlN1Ea2ZnVBC6BlO1DIvuHhbWgaBsJS+8QTCOjq1RnHeC3h8H 9EyGs0PyOvAhXbYGZ9GBaiIA6E64mhskZSVsMRR55YkhZW8DPiXr3JpGHaAsinPhb70B 6JarUo/yga0Lgmkm01GKXS/4vM5WTmYA+uZrk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.87.1 with SMTP id k1mr857005ybb.11.1254776242728; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <78568af10910051356t4ad5f0d2ld361d10b6d378dba@mail.gmail.com> References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> <4ACA5CCE.3040704@lifeless.net> <78568af10910051356t4ad5f0d2ld361d10b6d378dba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:57:22 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910051357h1e3b8a62jb995e110eea163e1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5997c386dc80475365c2f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5997c386dc80475365c2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That's good to know. I thought ka would help... but I was also talking about the overhead of a header where the payload is smaller than the framing. Eg: 8 byte requests, excluding which rpc. This seems like we could be hurt since the headers are potentially 5x the size of our payload/request params. On Oct 5, 2009 4:54 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: Ryan: Certainly keep alive will help in this case, if that's what you're referring to. The server holds the socket for N seconds or M requests, which ever comes first. What you're saving with KA is the connection setup / tear down. If you have a lot of cases where the client makes a single request and goes away, then KA hurts because the server holds the connection for the KA timeout (N seconds). This *really* helps if you're using TLS due to the additional connection setup overhead. It's my opinion and experience that KA helps greatly in the case of many exchanges between a small to medium number of clients and a server such as RPC. The anti-example is an ad server or web beacon server, for instance. Regards. Ryan Rawson wrote: > I have a question about these headers... will they impact the ability to do > ... -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com --000e0cd5997c386dc80475365c2f-- From general-return-583-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 21:14:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47570 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 21:14:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 21:14:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 46618 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 21:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46538 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 21:14:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46528 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 21:14:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:14:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:14:42 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-32-184.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.32.184]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70E3DC307 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:13:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4ACA618F.5040709@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:13:51 -0400 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291338o7f09601ci102186e23fd4d464@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2775C.2000302@apache.org> <7c962aed0909291457o48baee08hfa3b6f4eb16213de@mail.gmail.com> <4AC2956F.6020303@apache.org> <4ACA5A63.1040707@lifeless.net> <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> <4ACA5CCE.3040704@lifeless.net> <78568af10910051356t4ad5f0d2ld361d10b6d378dba@mail.gmail.com> <78568af10910051357h1e3b8a62jb995e110eea163e1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78568af10910051357h1e3b8a62jb995e110eea163e1@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan Rawson wrote: > That's good to know. I thought ka would help... but I was also talking about > the overhead of a header where the payload is smaller than the framing. Eg: > 8 byte requests, excluding which rpc. This seems like we could be hurt since > the headers are potentially 5x the size of our payload/request params. > Oh, got you. That's the classic SOAP problem. ;) I think it's possible, but to what degree I couldn't be sure. HTTP has that kind of overhead because of the generality. I think you'd get that with anything that isn't specifically designed to be wire efficient. Of course, you wind up having to do what Doug originally mentioned; rebuilding and maintaining the original stuff that HTTP (and the supporting clients) already supports. If over-optimization is in fact the root of all evil (which I've heard once or twice) then maybe it makes sense to start simple and iterate if necessary. In other words, say screw it, use HTTP, strip unnecessary headers, but design the code such that Avro's transport is interface based in case it needs to change. I think prototyping an Avro transport with HTTP, optimizing, and then dropping lower level if necessary is a better approach than going straight to the latter. All of that said, I don't have the insight into the code base that some of the other folks do. This is based on my experience with similar high throughput systems, but I wouldn't say I'm 100% convinced it applies here as the payloads in those systems were bigger than 8 bytes. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-584-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 05 23:48:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98521 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 23:48:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 23:48:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 98846 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 23:48:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98773 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 23:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98763 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 23:48:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 98493 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 23:48:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.102]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4ACA85C8.9000804@apache.org> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:48:24 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <4AAAC403.80809@apache.org> <1CB467B9-B60C-4ED0-BA82-7BB571E724C6@apache.org> <4AC13BC7.6020902@apache.org> <4AC2635C.20902@apache.org> <52336B40-7CA1-486D-ADF0-1F9B99AB1808@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <52336B40-7CA1-486D-ADF0-1F9B99AB1808@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sanjay Radia wrote: > What about out of order exchange. Will we be able to support that with > http transport? Out-of-order exchange was originally added to Hadoop's RPC when it was a part of Nutch. It's an important optimization for distributed search, but it's not clear how important it is currently to Hadoop. That said, the simple way to deal with this in HTTP is to use a client library that pools connections, so that, if a second request to the same service is made by another thread in the same client process before the first has returned, a second connection is opened. If this is common, the high-water mark of connections on the server will be higher. However with an async-io-based server, the number of connections should not be a primary bottleneck. And again, we don't know how common this is. Doug From general-return-585-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 06 03:00:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46678 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 03:00:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 03:00:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 38876 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:00:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38803 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38793 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 03:00:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:00:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:59:57 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:59:35 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:59:24 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpF/f1TOLX+HK0OTAeTv/iOfb0/LQAMwUAI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4ACA5CCE.3040704@lifeless.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/5/09 1:53 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: > Ryan: >=20 > Certainly keep alive will help in this case, if that's what you're > referring to. The server holds the socket for N seconds or M requests, > which ever comes first. What you're saving with KA is the connection > setup / tear down. If you have a lot of cases where the client makes a > single request and goes away, then KA hurts because the server holds the > connection for the KA timeout (N seconds). This *really* helps if you're > using TLS due to the additional connection setup overhead. >=20 > It's my opinion and experience that KA helps greatly in the case of many > exchanges between a small to medium number of clients and a server such > as RPC. The anti-example is an ad server or web beacon server, for instan= ce. >=20 Even in the beacon case, if the browser is likely to send another request shortly, it cuts the effective network latency in half. Establishing a TCP connection is at minimum one full round trip -- before the request. If latency is important KeepAlive is useful as long as a second request is expected in a short enough time. As long as the server is not process or thread per connection, one can scal= e up connection count rather high (20k) if necessary. With respect to Avro/Hadoop, I suspect requests from clients to be time clustered. > Regards. >=20 > Ryan Rawson wrote: >> I have a question about these headers... will they impact the ability to= do >> many, but small, rpcs? Imagine you'd need to support 5,000 to 50,000 >> rpcs/second. Would this help or hinder? >>=20 >> On Oct 5, 2009 4:44 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: >>=20 >> Doug Cutting wrote: > More or less. Except we can probably arrange to om= it >> most of those > response... >> Content-Type and Server are probably unavoidable. Some of the others are >> extremely helpful during development / debugging / etc. It depends on >> how "open" you are about HTTP being the transport (i.e. do you let >> developers augment these headers to support additional features, etc.). >> This may not make sense in the context of something specialized like >> Avro transport. >>=20 >>> I today implemented a simple HTTP-based transport for Avro: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira... >> Just out of curiousity, were you using HTTP keep alive? During testing >> on a project a few years ago, I found a huge difference if Keep Alive is >> supported. In retrospect, that should have been obvious. I'd imagine the >> usage pattern here would be a large number of repeated calls between the >> same client / server within a short period of time; perfect for KA. >>=20 >> Regards. >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> eric@lifless.net >> http://esammer.blogspot.com >>=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com >=20 From general-return-586-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 06 03:16:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50131 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 03:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 03:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 49233 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49165 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49155 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 03:16:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:16:00 +0000 Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-32-184.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.32.184]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B438DC37C for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:15:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4ACAB63C.4010803@lifeless.net> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:15:08 -0400 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott Carey wrote: > Even in the beacon case, if the browser is likely to send another request > shortly, it cuts the effective network latency in half. Which is generally not the case in the beacon / ad server use case. That was the only point I was making. That's besides the point, though. I think we both agree that KA for something like Avro transport is probably good. > Establishing a TCP > connection is at minimum one full round trip -- before the request. If > latency is important KeepAlive is useful as long as a second request is > expected in a short enough time. > > As long as the server is not process or thread per connection, one can scale > up connection count rather high (20k) if necessary. > > With respect to Avro/Hadoop, I suspect requests from clients to be time > clustered. That was my thought as well. The thing that gets me is that in the case of Hadoop (and the related subprojects) the clients utilizing this particular HTTP connection are probably going to be pretty small (maybe low thousands?). This is even better for keep alive as there's a solid chance you're going to have a high reuse rate. Of course, I'm assuming we're talking about things like name node to data node, hbase client to region servers, and those types of communications. Even if you just used Jetty (or any other thin HTTP 1.1 container that supports KA), one should easily be able to see good performance. Regards. -- Eric Sammer eric@lifless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-587-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 06 03:20:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50805 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 03:20:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 03:20:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 51862 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:20:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51801 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51791 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 03:20:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.16] (HELO EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:20:27 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.16]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:19:45 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:19:34 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpF/RNaX39mo3/YRk6Eiof+R4/2AwANsAyI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <78568af10910051347q7ea4c92bj4e27d372fea9588@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/5/09 1:47 PM, "Ryan Rawson" wrote: > I have a question about these headers... will they impact the ability to = do > many, but small, rpcs? Imagine you'd need to support 5,000 to 50,000 > rpcs/second. Would this help or hinder? >=20 As long as the HTTP response and request fit in one network packet (pessimistic - 1KB or so) there is not much overhead. 50k rpcs/sec with gigabit ethernet saturated (~100MB/sec) is ~2KB per request. So, on faster networks an extra 100 to 200 bytes or so won't matter. On the WAN, it will have more of an effect if the bandwidth is low and the latency also very low if the RPC is very 'chatty' and not 'chunky' enough. However, on most WAN links network latency is going to kill you far, far more than an extra 200 bytes. For example, imagine a 20ms latency link. The max RPC throughput to a single client is then 50/sec (one per 20ms). With a 1k payload per request= , that's 50k per sec max data transfer. HTTP pipelining could help here -- but isn't as well supported as one would like. If WAN level RPC is a goal, the main challenges there will be latency related first, and packet size related second. On a fast local network (gigabit) I suspect throughput problems of other sorts to be the issue before bandwidth from slightly larger packets. Furthermore, its not like a TCP packet is 0 bytes on its own. HTTP adds some overhead, but it can be kept relatively trim.=20 From general-return-588-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 06 03:31:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52659 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 03:31:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 03:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 57026 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:31:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56901 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 03:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56718 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 03:31:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:31:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:31:46 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:31:04 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:30:50 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpGM1zaG6gyouT6S/iGbWfT3OWuyAAAgmjo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4ACAB63C.4010803@lifeless.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> With respect to Avro/Hadoop, I suspect requests from clients to be time >> clustered. >=20 > That was my thought as well. The thing that gets me is that in the case > of Hadoop (and the related subprojects) the clients utilizing this > particular HTTP connection are probably going to be pretty small (maybe > low thousands?). This is even better for keep alive as there's a solid > chance you're going to have a high reuse rate. Of course, I'm assuming > we're talking about things like name node to data node, hbase client to > region servers, and those types of communications. Even if you just used > Jetty (or any other thin HTTP 1.1 container that supports KA), one > should easily be able to see good performance. >=20 Absolutely. =20 Additionally, I realized one more thing -- when a client knows they aren't likely to send another request soon, they can send a request with Connection: close. Well behaved clients can help maximize the benefit. > Regards. > -- > Eric Sammer > eric@lifless.net > http://esammer.blogspot.com >=20 From general-return-589-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 08 22:11:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33086 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2009 22:11:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2009 22:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 74127 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 22:11:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74044 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 22:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74034 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2009 22:11:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:11:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.227] (HELO QMTA12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:11:21 +0000 Received: from OMTA22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73]) by QMTA12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qAsF1c0051ap0As5CNB1QS; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:11:01 +0000 Received: from tryarticle-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qNFQ1c0052SbwD53iNFTt7; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:15:31 +0000 Message-Id: <6A69E66F-E8D3-49D4-8068-AF84D651EC8A@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:10:50 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I still don't see how to make this play well with security. Security needs to go under the transport layer so that it is easy to add encryption on the wire. If you go with HTTP, the only way that is portable at all is to use HTTP over SSL. SSL is for when there aren't shared keys and Kerberos provides those shared keys. SPNEGO is the standard method of using Kerberos with HTTP and we are planning to use that for the web UI's. But SPNEGO is very much the least painful of the alternatives and I'd rather not force our RPC services into that corner. I also have serious doubts about performance, but that is hard to answer until we have code to test. It is an interesting question how much we depend on being able to answer queries out of order. There are some parts of the code where overlapping requests from the same client matter. In particular, the terasort scheduler uses threads to access the namenode. That would stop providing any pipelining, which I believe would be significant. In short, I think that an HTTP transport is great for playing with, but I don't think you can assume it will work as the primary transport. -- Owen From general-return-590-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 09 17:50:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98140 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 17:50:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 17:50:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 88959 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 17:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88896 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 17:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88886 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 17:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 98047 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 17:49:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.109]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:49:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4ACF77C3.6020809@apache.org> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:49:55 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: <6A69E66F-E8D3-49D4-8068-AF84D651EC8A@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6A69E66F-E8D3-49D4-8068-AF84D651EC8A@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Owen O'Malley wrote: > SPNEGO is the > standard method of using Kerberos with HTTP and we are planning to use > that for the web UI's. Java 6 also supports using SPNEGO for RPC over HTTP out of the box: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/net/http-auth.html > I also have serious doubts about performance, but that is hard to answer > until we have code to test. The good news is that, since the HTTP stuff is already implemented, we can test its performance easily. Performance of insecure access over HTTP looks good so far. It's an open question are how much HTTP-based security will slow things versus non-HTTP-based security. > It is an interesting question how much we > depend on being able to answer queries out of order. There are some > parts of the code where overlapping requests from the same client > matter. In particular, the terasort scheduler uses threads to access the > namenode. That would stop providing any pipelining, which I believe > would be significant. No, we wouldn't stop any pipelining, we'd just use more connections to implement it. With HttpClient one can limit the number of pooled connnections per host: http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/apidocs/org/apache/commons/httpclient/MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.html#setMaxConnectionsPerHost%28int%29 Connections are not free of course, but Jetty has been benchmarked at 20,000 concurrent connections: http://cometdaily.com/2008/01/07/20000-reasons-that-comet-scales/ > In short, I think that an HTTP transport is great for playing with, but > I don't think you can assume it will work as the primary transport. I agree, we cannot assume it. But it's easy to try it and see how it fares. Any investment in getting it working is perhaps not wasted, since, besides providing a performance baseline, it also may be useful to provide HTTP-based access to services even if a higher-performance option is implemented. Doug From general-return-591-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 09 18:14:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5551 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 18:14:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 18:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25988 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 18:14:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25930 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 18:14:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25920 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 18:14:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:14:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:14:34 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n99IDBoa024647 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=G941LSnIbISnmt8yOlL6Vhi/teNdTEPxs4ICJOfJVIgFMWo4N0TbYmtrP/4UpiSb Received: from SNV-EXVS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.225]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:13:10 -0700 Received: from 10.72.244.163 ([10.72.244.163]) by SNV-EXVS05.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.45]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:13:10 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:13:09 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Sanjay Radia To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpJDCfStlBLAXfKQUu0VVDx7iJBgA== In-Reply-To: <4ACF77C3.6020809@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2009 18:13:10.0748 (UTC) FILETIME=[28DCE1C0:01CA490C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/9/09 10:49 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Owen O'Malley wrote: >> SPNEGO is the >> standard method of using Kerberos with HTTP and we are planning to use >> that for the web UI's. > > Java 6 also supports using SPNEGO for RPC over HTTP out of the box: > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/net/http-auth.html > >> I also have serious doubts about performance, but that is hard to answer >> until we have code to test. > > The good news is that, since the HTTP stuff is already implemented, we > can test its performance easily. Performance of insecure access over > HTTP looks good so far. It's an open question are how much HTTP-based > security will slow things versus non-HTTP-based security. > >> It is an interesting question how much we >> depend on being able to answer queries out of order. There are some >> parts of the code where overlapping requests from the same client >> matter. In particular, the terasort scheduler uses threads to access the >> namenode. That would stop providing any pipelining, which I believe >> would be significant. > > No, we wouldn't stop any pipelining, we'd just use more connections to > implement it. With HttpClient one can limit the number of pooled > connnections per host: > > http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/apidocs/org/apache/commons/httpclient/Mult > iThreadedHttpConnectionManager.html#setMaxConnectionsPerHost%28int%29 > > Connections are not free of course, but Jetty has been benchmarked at > 20,000 concurrent connections: > > http://cometdaily.com/2008/01/07/20000-reasons-that-comet-scales/ > >> In short, I think that an HTTP transport is great for playing with, but >> I don't think you can assume it will work as the primary transport. > > I agree, we cannot assume it. But it's easy to try it and see how it > fares. Any investment in getting it working is perhaps not wasted, > since, besides providing a performance baseline, it also may be useful > to provide HTTP-based access to services even if a higher-performance > option is implemented. Will the RPC over HTTP be transparent so that that we can replace with a different layer if needed? My worry was the separation of data and checksums; someone had mentioned that one could do this over 2 RPCs - that is not transparent. Also the other issue is porting from data transfer socket streams to RPC - that port will not be transparent. We cannot afford to loose performance over that change. Further, moving from streaming sockets to RPC is a very significant code change to the dfs-client and data nodes. I assume that we going to create a branch that moves the data transfer protocols to RPC and test the performance and if it is good then we commit and move to RPC? I am worried about this part - I am surprised that you two are not. Am I missing something here? sanjay > > Doug From general-return-592-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 09 19:56:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42774 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2009 19:56:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2009 19:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 83284 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 19:56:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83219 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2009 19:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83209 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 19:56:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:56:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:56:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 41559 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2009 19:56:32 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.109]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:56:32 +0000 Message-ID: <4ACF956E.1000201@apache.org> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:56:30 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sanjay Radia wrote: > Will the RPC over HTTP be transparent so that that we can replace with a > different layer if needed? Yes. > My worry was the separation of data and checksums; someone had mentioned > that one could do this over 2 RPCs - that is not transparent. That was suggested as a possibility if we did not want to use RPC for data, but rather raw HTTP, e.g., with a separate URL per block. The zerocopy support built into most HTTP servers only supports entire responses from a single file, so if we wanted to take advantage of these zerocopy implementations we'd not use RPC for block access, but could use HTTP and hence share security, etc. Using raw HTTP for block access might also perform better, since it can use TCP flow control, rather than RPC call/response. In my microbenchmarks, RPC call/response was fast enough to easily saturate disks and networks, so that might be moot, although RPC call/response for file data may use more CPU than we'd like. With our own transport implementation we could get RPC call/response to use zerocopy for file data. > I assume that we > going to create a branch that moves the data transfer protocols to RPC and > test the performance and if it is good then we commit and move to RPC? Yes. We obviously cannot change the file data transfer protocol without benchmarking. Ideally file data transfer can share as much as possible with other protocols. The most optimistic approach would be to use HTTP-based RPC call/response, so we ought to benchmark that. This was the purpose of my recently-reported microbenchmarks. We also need to determine whether both TCP flow-control and zerocopy are critical to data file performance. If both are indeed critical, and HTTP proves sufficient for everything else, then we should consider using non-RPC HTTP for file data transfer, since it supports both zerocopy and TCP-based flow control, and the implementation of security, etc. could be shared. But, on the other hand, if HTTP is deemed inappropriate for security and we develop our own RPC transport that permits zerocopy, and TCP flow-control over entire blocks is not required, then we might use RPC for file data. What I'm hoping we can avoid is, as today, using different transports for different protocols, re-implementing security, connection pooling, async request processing, etc. for each, requiring separate configuration and ports for each, etc. But even that might be required. We don't know yet. I think starting with HTTP as a hypothesis permits us to make progress without a lot of up-front investment. Doug From general-return-593-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 10 17:49:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11567 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2009 17:49:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2009 17:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 91753 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2009 17:49:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91680 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2009 17:49:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91670 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2009 17:49:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:49:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cabiwan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:48:56 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so6695800bwz.29 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=kbBE40dJLS3Lf5TsUkoNaZhlukJshDD7YygHaKVRjyI=; b=l2zV3ERh3ehMvAmPUuQ51wEFxSLlPsKv4iE702jkam1ZsyDdGUTyioxcghbodDjxR3 h14EkI3cX+KI+b8Bb0f04x223NTcmgRR8K12WVE2Kge55D22NgLl37P7vZmTzEn6m+y9 QamoV21icgAgOC2QQfuRqlSqo0D0ucW+BSHpQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qBN+mY8P8BVa+HtcpycHn2xaJ/+psCnu6FATROCOqKu8fW2Z+A9DaCBLUkUt3bf+Ij 8kO+Ma0jwY3jt05wdaSytNlt4epf20hxwqnJ8yrd7cHoj7D1fnN24NmvONvsxVG4iKsj VSrpvKDJJqdnqdPp5+WMa1y+xNugH6yDxXpGA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.81.2 with SMTP id i2mr1675468mul.81.1255196915502; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:48:35 +0200 Message-ID: <309f76d00910101048x4028765fg477f1b249e223c8b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: SIMPLE QUESTIONS ABOUT DISTRIBUTEDCACHE... From: Alberto Luengo Cabanillas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6482b5c45912b0475984e67 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6482b5c45912b0475984e67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone! I=B4m trying to distribute some common data between my nodes, = but I=B4m unable to do it. I have some questions about this: 1.- I=B4m working in PseudoDistributed mode in Windows (under Cygwin) and m= y DFS server is running on a virtual machine (Ubuntu server). May I use DistributedCache normally with this configuration? 2.-In the case of the Mapper nodes, in the Driver class I add these two lines: URI uriMapper =3Dnew URI("/user/hadoop-user/data/mapper_configuration.dat")= ; (I also verify this file already exists in the DFS). DistributedCache.addCacheFile(uriMapper,conf); 3.- In the Mapper class, I have this: @Override protected void setup(Context cont) { ... String configureCacheName =3D new Path("/user/hadoop-user/data/mapper_configuration.dat").getName(); Path [] cacheFiles =3D DistributedCache.getLocalCacheFiles(cont.getConfiguration()); System.out.println("The file is: "+cacheFiles.toString()); ... } Does anyone have an idea about what I=B4m doing wrong? (I=B4m going crazy, actually...) Thanks a lot in advance. --=20 Alberto --0016e6482b5c45912b0475984e67-- From general-return-594-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 10 18:39:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26838 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2009 18:39:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2009 18:39:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11738 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2009 18:39:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11654 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2009 18:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11644 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2009 18:39:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:39:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.186] (HELO mail-vw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.212.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:39:09 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so5548525vws.2 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u+Ygi/Rf11Rtk6v4XIWQuAWYQXsteOa1BKxjs3ydNqo=; b=t9KFPc+gTPR/JBDghvoFX0dv2FgvPWQ0cULVrdrB9ki2d5Me2IkzUwv118srH7bL3W dmXVPx7mwgaKnJ725xKRO2C/AgtQEb1JydtDjLGIsTFzoIvzJAaVl8VgUMigrt4tcDQ1 U0S0sxDcRviqviccMbgwNqVakCXOwaDVQoVMQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MPau9kcokw/tM+Gmi/LQCppnDXGmYQZ2IVu1X4ZzEnu55dcxM7aOcrrGaVWL9D1iaA oRxuef9qe4sE6KXHgWWtBFMsz6hl90KdrYz8AtG1AJvi6himNWmGWU9hjP0cYuTwQI5W FRpxXdJAJWlJZPNkLU6HpW5RhqfMjSml2pviY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.88.209 with SMTP id b17mr5993402vcm.98.1255199928470; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:38:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <309f76d00910101048x4028765fg477f1b249e223c8b@mail.gmail.com> References: <309f76d00910101048x4028765fg477f1b249e223c8b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:38:48 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910101138x4586a05bj9ba03ad483040e1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SIMPLE QUESTIONS ABOUT DISTRIBUTEDCACHE... From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636284e58dbcc92047599011d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636284e58dbcc92047599011d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The distributed cache does not behave as expected in PsuedoDistributed mode= . Since all of the tasks run within the same jvm, there is no easy way to alter the class path to add distributed cache items, in addition there is n= o way to change the working directory of the jvm to the 'per task directory' that the normal task runner creates, where the distributed cache items made available. On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alberto Luengo Cabanillas < cabiwan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! I=B4m trying to distribute some common data between my nodes= , > but > I=B4m unable to do it. I have some questions about this: > > 1.- I=B4m working in PseudoDistributed mode in Windows (under Cygwin) and= my > DFS server is running on a virtual machine (Ubuntu server). May I use > DistributedCache normally with this configuration? > 2.-In the case of the Mapper nodes, in the Driver class I add these two > lines: > > URI uriMapper =3Dnew URI("/user/hadoop-user/data/mapper_configuration.dat= "); > (I also verify this file already exists in the DFS). > DistributedCache.addCacheFile(uriMapper,conf); > > 3.- In the Mapper class, I have this: > > @Override > protected void setup(Context cont) { > ... > String configureCacheName =3D new > Path("/user/hadoop-user/data/mapper_configuration.dat").getName(); > Path [] cacheFiles =3D > DistributedCache.getLocalCacheFiles(cont.getConfiguration()); > System.out.println("The file is: "+cacheFiles.toString()); > ... > } > > Does anyone have an idea about what I=B4m doing wrong? (I=B4m going crazy= , > actually...) > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > -- > Alberto > --=20 Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --001636284e58dbcc92047599011d-- From general-return-595-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 11 01:12:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 833 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2009 01:12:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2009 01:12:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 49304 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 01:12:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49252 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2009 01:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49242 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2009 01:12:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:12:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.78.17.17] (HELO EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net) (64.78.17.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:12:20 +0000 Received: from EXVMBX018-1.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.47]) by EXHUB018-2.exch018.msoutlookonline.net ([64.78.17.17]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:11:38 -0700 From: Scott Carey To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:11:20 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpJCQCEHXFVafpVQXaJtrNlnq7atABBr0cn Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4ACF77C3.6020809@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/9/09 10:49 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >=20 >> It is an interesting question how much we >> depend on being able to answer queries out of order. There are some >> parts of the code where overlapping requests from the same client >> matter. In particular, the terasort scheduler uses threads to access the >> namenode. That would stop providing any pipelining, which I believe >> would be significant. >=20 > No, we wouldn't stop any pipelining, we'd just use more connections to > implement it. With HttpClient one can limit the number of pooled > connnections per host: >=20 Also since HTTP supports in-order pipelining out of the box, its only out-of-order stuff that would require additional connections. >=20 > Doug >=20 Requirements may end up ruling out HTTP, but I doubt that performance (in the insecure case) will be the cause since there are so many high performance client and server implementations available. Consider something lower level than the Servlet API for the server side -- it is baggage-laden and does not allow access to all data in unconverted form or any asynchronous i/o. In this respect, jetty has lower level, light-weight API access points. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Architecture If HTTP is not used, I suggest a strong look at apache MINA for constructin= g high performance NIO clients and servers with Java http://mina.apache.org/ From general-return-596-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 01:53:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33198 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 01:53:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 01:53:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 65404 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 01:53:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65318 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 01:53:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65308 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 01:53:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:53:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.200.80.34] (HELO smtp1.es.uci.edu) (128.200.80.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:53:22 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ip72-211-211-194.oc.oc.cox.net [72.211.211.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9C1qxYL022343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:53:00 -0700 X-UCInetID: vayyalas Message-ID: <4AD26FD1.8080905@uci.edu> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:52:49 -0500 From: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Simulators for Hadoop ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All, I am new to Hadoop and planning to do a project which helps me learn technologies like Pig and Hive. The problem is I do not have access to any Hadoop like cluster. I was wondering if there are any simulators in which I can specify the node configurations and run it on my machine. Please help me solve this issue. Thanks Vandana From general-return-597-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 04:14:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62329 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 04:14:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 04:14:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 7812 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 04:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7620 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 04:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7610 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 04:14:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:14:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.99.254.144] (HELO rsmtp2.corp.hki.yahoo.com) (203.99.254.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:14:07 +0000 Received: from builtvalue-dr.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com (builtvalue-dr.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [10.66.77.165]) by rsmtp2.corp.hki.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.rout) with ESMTP id n9C4Dcmc063370 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:13:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z7fOUbMxA2wuirxa7UTkBIYVdrPegiWMEUc7Ut528OgERPIBy8fbXUJttlfdyeid Message-ID: <4AD2ACF2.6000309@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:43:38 +0530 From: Sharad Agarwal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Simulators for Hadoop ?? References: <4AD26FD1.8080905@uci.edu> In-Reply-To: <4AD26FD1.8080905@uci.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop can be run on single node. See http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/quickstart.html#PseudoDistributed Sharad From general-return-598-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 09:16:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30087 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 09:16:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 09:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 48758 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 09:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48678 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 09:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48668 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 09:16:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:16:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.226] (HELO mail-gx0-f226.google.com) (209.85.217.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:16:13 +0000 Received: by gxk26 with SMTP id 26so2556089gxk.11 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.34.10 with SMTP id m10mr5206505anj.32.1255338951945; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (c-24-23-193-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.23.193.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm2213017yxe.1.2009.10.12.02.15.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD2F3C5.5010808@cloudera.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:15:49 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Simulators for Hadoop ?? References: <4AD26FD1.8080905@uci.edu> In-Reply-To: <4AD26FD1.8080905@uci.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Vadana, This VMware virtual machine has a pre-installed hadoop in local mode with both pig and hive: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training-virtual-machine Good luck with your project, -- amr > Hi All, > > I am new to Hadoop and planning to do a project which helps me learn > technologies like Pig and Hive. The problem is I do not have access to > any Hadoop like cluster. I was wondering if there are any simulators > in which I can specify the node configurations and run it on my > machine. Please help me solve this issue. > > Thanks > Vandana From general-return-599-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 11:35:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59487 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 11:35:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 11:35:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 4343 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 11:35:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4263 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 11:35:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4253 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 11:35:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:35:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sawerset@i.ua designates 91.198.36.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [91.198.36.2] (HELO web01.mi6.kiev.ua) (91.198.36.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:35:29 +0000 Received: from st05.mi6 ([10.0.0.29] helo=st05.mi6.kiev.ua) by web01.mi6.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxJB9-0007R2-SJ for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:35:05 +0300 Received: from web by st05.mi6.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxJB1-0005FT-F2 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:34:55 +0300 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: =?windows-1251?B?SG93IHRvIHJlYWQgc2V0dGluZ3MgaGFkb29wIGNsdXN0ZXIgZnJvbSBKYXZhIHByb2dyYW0/?= Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:34:55 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yOLg7SDC4PHo6/zl4g==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009090216 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.14 X-Sender-IP: 89.28.203.82 (192.168.242.135) X-Mailer: I.UA Mail System Message-Id: How to read settings hadoop cluster from Java program? Is there any sdk for such things? -- =F0=E5=EA=EB=E0=EC=E0 --------------------------------------------------= --------- =CB=F3=F7=F8=E8=E9 =F5=EE=F1=F2=E8=ED=E3 =EE=F2 $3.45 =C4=EE=EC=E5=ED =E2 =EF=EE=E4=E0=F0=EE=EA - www.hostpro.ua From general-return-600-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 15:43:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54840 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 15:43:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 15:43:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 48746 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 15:43:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48664 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 15:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48654 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 15:43:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:43:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.186] (HELO mail-vw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.212.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:43:26 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so6096154vws.2 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x37C4FcUjksUBDWSArTCnZuLUbmA9u2P4hiDOWtKXn8=; b=OV8PcTMfKBz7EIt5Eli9VFQiH3cZ41qOqmMvKIkt/SBwkhZfj4fy4p7HuNhPJICSHD yeC1IhH3qgQgctaoQ7yrAPd4aEGdVgQaz7UwUcvbe0SGqzQPafF528Is67I7cr30U6uL S4/bZus0e3OdrZi8XbPxKQrvzyjTszHiqHcjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Zx5fkKdBCnwGWxuctJGtfxIsRe5zfefhZL6dgoAy2vnT8usz7y/Camdkyy5KWazHn1 Yd1B1Qu43gNd/6d4yoAdssX7fjkbU2d6Gq061mfe5bqTzhAoNswCYQtTpCGOrUs5jIty xpHpZHIF24qHx2e5lzSFeSKfr95d6nRC1RvRU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.15.68 with SMTP id j4mr8600183vca.18.1255362185310; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:43:04 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to read settings hadoop cluster from Java program? From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e76f121edc5b0475bec96e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485e76f121edc5b0475bec96e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You may use the getClusterStatus method of the JobClient object. 2009/10/12 =E9=D7=C1=CE =F7=C1=D3=C9=CC=D8=C5=D7 > How to read settings hadoop cluster from Java program? > Is there any sdk for such things? > > -- =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=C1 ------------------------------------------------= ----------- > =EC=D5=DE=DB=C9=CA =C8=CF=D3=D4=C9=CE=C7 =CF=D4 $3.45 > =E4=CF=CD=C5=CE =D7 =D0=CF=C4=C1=D2=CF=CB - www.hostpro.ua > > --=20 Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=3Djewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --001485e76f121edc5b0475bec96e-- From general-return-601-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 12 23:51:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10684 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2009 23:51:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2009 23:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 74604 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 23:51:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74527 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2009 23:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74517 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2009 23:51:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:51:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:51:03 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so652861qwb.35 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:50:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cZzOVwsoYICGTeXfgOZbYpV/uMC3OvmkVXyRm6hretw=; b=Fp0HqzIjqAX7P965YSB3R7s9m6wktifDlg7Sha2x+cNET/OdGonKDx0xgG3DyWlZiF TLBLReh0+UaQSDtCw7l+qyvpavzKT7tQ91vFmB2Jyls6U6TyY0HbE0h9iE5OBkkjET1G JwI3KwuZ1xaJ0ufQpBfPe5+uOMqma6pYvMQFU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ExJUP9ZuwjtPX9ugXOypbbbLt6rHKTo7viJqngUyDIo9EgkS7gILlu1ueCFB2NKcEw 2+l+vLSVGWzDmQ4zUm/T8YqAghTBlGo46WUpugrGH3AplNIuwcZM9tOp25nurKjaHD/k Kp/csu0QrGCa1sn5B+9IVBEfNqTM3hlF9/MnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.51.219 with SMTP id e27mr2548695qcg.7.1255391442942; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:50:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7c962aed0910121650g7c6f5c11ja60ec614136d7f78@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c962aed0910121650g7c6f5c11ja60ec614136d7f78@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:50:42 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 08831a0c14ffa4e1 Message-ID: <7c962aed0910121650r255d2e92m41919d6bc4a37c88@mail.gmail.com> Subject: ANN HBase 0.20.1 is available for download From: stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367d595a02bda30475c5991d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367d595a02bda30475c5991d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HBase 0.20.1 is available for download: http://hbase.org/releases.html. Sixty issues have been addressed since hbase 0.20.0. The release notes are available here: http://su.pr/1ypRmy. Please upgrade at your convenience. Thanks to all who contributed to this release, Yours, The HBase Team --0016367d595a02bda30475c5991d-- From general-return-602-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 12:57:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78662 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 12:57:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 12:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 44342 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 12:57:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44275 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 12:57:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44265 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 12:57:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:57:11 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so921688fga.11 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.170.22 with SMTP id s22mr826640fge.37.1255438606455; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nsf264fa356e37 ([202.51.92.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm2152965fga.15.2009.10.13.05.56.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:56:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chandan Tamrakar" To: References: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Reading files from local file system Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:41:42 +0545 Message-ID: <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpLUsSGQFOTfocFSCK/dfxCPVUfeAAiAbkA Content-Language: en-us x-cr-puzzleid: {2767A896-8A0C-4EF9-A45A-E2007A1BA218} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BYc6 Btlb CAvR Ch7a C/cn DF3b Dyji D7lT EWfM Epol EwX8 ExS/ GxvE HRaa I4qY Jkd0;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{2767A896-8A0C-4EF9-A45A-E2007A1BA218};YwBoAGEAbgBkAGEAbgAuAHQAYQBtAHIAYQBrAGEAcgBAAG4AZQBwAGEAcwBvAGYAdAAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:56:39 GMT;UgBlAGEAZABpAG4AZwAgAGYAaQBsAGUAcwAgAGYAcgBvAG0AIABsAG8AYwBhAGwAIABmAGkAbABlACAAcwB5AHMAdABlAG0A We are trying to read files from local file system. But when running the map reduce it is not able to read files from the input location (the input location is also local file system location). For this we changed the configuration of the hadoop-site.xml as shown below: /etc/conf/hadoop/hadoop-site.xml fs.default.name file:/// [admin@localhost ~]$ hadoop jar Test.jar /home/admin/input/test.txt output1 Suppose Test.txt is pain text file that contains Test1 Test2 Test3 While running simple MapReduce job we get following exception "File not found exception " , we are using TextInputFormat in our Job configuration 09/10/13 17:26:35 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1 09/10/13 17:26:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_200910131447_0033 09/10/13 17:26:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 09/10/13 17:27:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_200910131447_0033_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED java.io.FileNotFoundException: File file:/home/admin/Desktop/input/test.txt does not exist. at org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.jav a:420) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:25 9) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.(Checks umFileSystem.java:117) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.open(ChecksumFileSystem.java:275) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:364) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.(LineRecordReader.java:206) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat.getRecordReader(TextInputFormat.jav a:50) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:219) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) However, running in the code as a separate Main method does work well. public static void main (String [] args) throws IOException { Configuration conf = new Configuration(); FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); Path filenamePath = new Path(theFilename); FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path("abc.txt")); out.writeUTF("abc"); out.close(); } The above code works fine when running it as a jar in hadoop. The above code successfully creates file in /home/admin/abc.txt when running from admin user. From general-return-603-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 13:50:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96595 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 13:50:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 13:50:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 58129 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 13:49:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58088 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 13:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58078 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 13:49:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:49:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.177] (HELO mail-pz0-f177.google.com) (209.85.222.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:49:56 +0000 Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7so1301976pzk.30 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:49:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WC0hhpP1DSe1OtIveAJXT6U9TO1AzmveLadEn/I22C8=; b=IkB3PU/bt2Wjl+o4cAlssA4BkfeGmbm6q4+w/h234TDQ4h65+qpTtjPuHHRaZe6lVl luycin7MZLtgcS+rLVXSNK4a0D6vvBCIb52sSE+/IYHwhYeGAHl5VS4NXWO9XC7e3j1Z qiPJGYln16zGvQInI2GD+uUBB/M/3Cyz+VIfg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sJ7DCupd7oox9sL58vJH07uy9zPGiixy6Fai1ti0op5x+LfxGrDO0mGzUvVJ4Sg77A eSgr5K6lre8li0ZSbEddIk/iyoHGYLi7Ae9lpwPq1IaEOvlpnvRaGXmhZdHMMBPvJTnL 3wg8H2/n/yhfN05oswHIILZKgasXyhMjWo1bA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.55.14 with SMTP id d14mr76107wfa.270.1255441776107; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:49:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> References: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:49:36 -0700 Message-ID: <8211a1320910130649y14b06a67s13b268f31f6f786e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Reading files from local file system From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2bc9919e6da0475d15176 --001636b2bc9919e6da0475d15176 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Maybe you could debug your mapreduce job in eclipse, since you run it in local mode. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > We are trying to read files from local file system. But when running the > map > reduce it is not able to read files from the input location (the input > location is also local file system location). > > For this we changed the configuration of the hadoop-site.xml as shown > below: > > /etc/conf/hadoop/hadoop-site.xml > > > fs.default.name > file:/// > > > > [admin@localhost ~]$ hadoop jar Test.jar /home/admin/input/test.txt > output1 > > Suppose Test.txt is pain text file that contains > Test1 > Test2 > Test3 > > > While running simple MapReduce job we get following exception "File not > found exception " , we are using TextInputFormat in our Job configuration > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process > : 1 > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process > : 1 > 09/10/13 17:26:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_200910131447_0033 > 09/10/13 17:26:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > 09/10/13 17:27:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > attempt_200910131447_0033_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED > java.io.FileNotFoundException: File file:/home/admin/Desktop/input/test.txt > does not exist. > at > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.jav > a:420) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:25 > 9) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.(Checks > umFileSystem.java:117) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.open(ChecksumFileSystem.java:275) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:364) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.(LineRecordReader.java:206) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat.getRecordReader(TextInputFormat.jav > a:50) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:219) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) > > However, running in the code as a separate Main method does work well. > > public static void main (String [] args) throws IOException { > > Configuration conf = new Configuration(); > FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); > > Path filenamePath = new Path(theFilename); > FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path("abc.txt")); > out.writeUTF("abc"); > out.close(); > > } > > The above code works fine when running it as a jar in hadoop. The above > code > successfully creates file in /home/admin/abc.txt when running from admin > user. > > --001636b2bc9919e6da0475d15176-- From general-return-604-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 14:17:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5579 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 14:17:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 14:17:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 19131 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 14:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19044 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 14:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19024 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 14:17:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.80 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.80] (HELO mx5.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:17:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx5.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DEHFgD022078; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-71-179-71-29.bltmmd.east.verizon.net [71.179.71.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx5-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DEHEJZ022075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:17:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Tejas Lagvankar Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-110843886 Subject: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:17:14 -0400 Message-Id: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1255573035:2b40ae8e7c9d421eeaa39f89888cdbaf X-ClamAV: OK --Apple-Mail-5-110843886 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Hi, We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using the new 0.20.1 version. On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node dies off with the following exception: 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize (DistributedFileSystem.java:78) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem (FileSystem.java:1373) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java: 66) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java: 1385) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier (NameNode.java:208) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize (NameNode.java:204) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode. (NameNode.java:279) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode (NameNode.java:956) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main (NameNode.java:965) Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration files for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? The detail log file is attached along with. --Apple-Mail-5-110843886 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed The configuration files are as follows: MASTER CONFIG ------ conf/masters ------- master_hadoop ------ conf/slaves ------- master_hadoop slave_hadoop ------ core-site.xml ------- fs.default.name hdfs://master_hadoop hadoop.tmp.dir /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- dfs.replication 2 ------ mapred-site.xml ------- mapred.job.tracker tejas_hadoop:9001 SLAVE CONFIG ------ core-site.xml ------- hadoop.tmp.dir /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ fs.default.name hdfs://master_hadoop ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- dfs.replication 2 ------ mapred-site.xml ------- mapred.job.tracker tejas_hadoop:9001 Regards, Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 --Apple-Mail-5-110843886-- From general-return-605-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 15:44:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39267 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 15:44:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 15:44:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6627 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 15:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6043 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 15:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5919 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 15:44:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:44:17 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so5762210iwn.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:43:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.122.103 with SMTP id k39mr2711006ibr.10.1255448631196; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:43:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:43:51 +0000 Message-ID: <6e8dca540910130843k1743c85fmeb975a4670dfc6fc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem From: Kevin Sweeney To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6460848b23c470475d2e994 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6460848b23c470475d2e994 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Tejas, I just upgraded to 20.1 as well and you config all looks the same as mine except in the core-site.xml I have: fs.default.name hdfs://localhost:9000 Maybe you need to add the port on yours. I haven't seen that error before, but it seems to be suggesting it can't resolve the host. I'd say double-check your names and that they resolve. Hope that helps, Kevin On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > Hi, > > > We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using the new > 0.20.1 version. > > On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node dies off > with the following exception: > > 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: > Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:78) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1373) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1385) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier(NameNode.java:208) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:204) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:956) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) > > Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration files > for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? > > The detail log file is attached along with. > > > > > The configuration files are as follows: > > MASTER CONFIG > ------ conf/masters ------- > master_hadoop > > ------ conf/slaves ------- > master_hadoop > slave_hadoop > > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > > > SLAVE CONFIG > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ > > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > Regards, > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > > --0016e6460848b23c470475d2e994-- From general-return-606-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 16:06:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46418 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 16:06:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 16:06:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 50810 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50741 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50731 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 16:06:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:06:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.211.187] (HELO mail-yw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.211.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:06:22 +0000 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so6516455ywh.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.42.27 with SMTP id p27mr3920380agp.9.1255449958131; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320910130649y14b06a67s13b268f31f6f786e@mail.gmail.com> References: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> <8211a1320910130649y14b06a67s13b268f31f6f786e@mail.gmail.com> From: Chandan Tamrakar Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:05:38 -0700 Message-ID: <95f8b1a90910130905h38357b3fmd53c5a4b1c9ee5f8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Reading files from local file system To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636163e07c9a9390475d3389e --001636163e07c9a9390475d3389e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Do I need to change any configuration beside changing the default file system to "local file system' ? I am trying to input for example input.txt to map job input.txt will contain file location as following file://path/abc1.doc file://path/abc2.doc .. ... map program will read each line from input.txt and process them Do i need to change any configuration ? This is similar to how Nutch crawls . any feedbacks would be appreciated thanks On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Maybe you could debug your mapreduce job in eclipse, since you run it in > local mode. > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > > > > > We are trying to read files from local file system. But when running the > > map > > reduce it is not able to read files from the input location (the input > > location is also local file system location). > > > > For this we changed the configuration of the hadoop-site.xml as shown > > below: > > > > /etc/conf/hadoop/hadoop-site.xml > > > > > > fs.default.name > > file:/// > > > > > > > > [admin@localhost ~]$ hadoop jar Test.jar /home/admin/input/test.txt > > output1 > > > > Suppose Test.txt is pain text file that contains > > Test1 > > Test2 > > Test3 > > > > > > While running simple MapReduce job we get following exception "File not > > found exception " , we are using TextInputFormat in our Job configuration > > > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process > > : 1 > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > process > > : 1 > > 09/10/13 17:26:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > job_200910131447_0033 > > 09/10/13 17:26:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > 09/10/13 17:27:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > attempt_200910131447_0033_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > java.io.FileNotFoundException: File > file:/home/admin/Desktop/input/test.txt > > does not exist. > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.jav > > a:420) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:25 > > 9) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.(Checks > > umFileSystem.java:117) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.open(ChecksumFileSystem.java:275) > > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:364) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.(LineRecordReader.java:206) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat.getRecordReader(TextInputFormat.jav > > a:50) > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:219) > > at > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) > > > > However, running in the code as a separate Main method does work well. > > > > public static void main (String [] args) throws IOException { > > > > Configuration conf = new Configuration(); > > FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); > > > > Path filenamePath = new Path(theFilename); > > FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path("abc.txt")); > > out.writeUTF("abc"); > > out.close(); > > > > } > > > > The above code works fine when running it as a jar in hadoop. The above > > code > > successfully creates file in /home/admin/abc.txt when running from admin > > user. > > > > > -- Chandan Tamrakar --001636163e07c9a9390475d3389e-- From general-return-607-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 16:12:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48641 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 16:12:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 16:12:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 59644 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59561 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59541 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 16:12:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:12:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.211.187] (HELO mail-yw0-f187.google.com) (209.85.211.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:12:44 +0000 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so6523436ywh.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:12:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.10.1 with SMTP id 1mr4428922agj.62.1255450340157; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:12:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> From: Chandan Tamrakar Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:12:00 -0700 Message-ID: <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362835168eea820475d34f3b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016362835168eea820475d34f3b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think you need to specify the port as well for following port fs.default.name hdfs://master_hadoop On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > Hi, > > > We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using the new > 0.20.1 version. > > On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node dies off > with the following exception: > > 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: > Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:78) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1373) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1385) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier(NameNode.java:208) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:204) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:956) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) > > Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration files > for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? > > The detail log file is attached along with. > > > > > The configuration files are as follows: > > MASTER CONFIG > ------ conf/masters ------- > master_hadoop > > ------ conf/slaves ------- > master_hadoop > slave_hadoop > > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > > > SLAVE CONFIG > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ > > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > Regards, > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > > -- Chandan Tamrakar --0016362835168eea820475d34f3b-- From general-return-608-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 16:34:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56180 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 16:34:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 16:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 6994 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:34:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6904 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6880 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 16:34:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.79 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.79] (HELO mx4.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.79) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:34:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx4.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DGY8L5004545; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:34:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-71-179-71-29.bltmmd.east.verizon.net [71.179.71.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx4-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DGY8D9004540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:34:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Tejas Lagvankar In-Reply-To: <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:34:07 -0400 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Chandan Tamrakar , jun hu , Kevin Sweeney Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1255581249:a08eca2decbdace0b3112e562de4cfbd X-ClamAV: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have tried with port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. Regards, Tejas On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: > I think you need to specify the port as well for following port > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using >> the new >> 0.20.1 version. >> >> On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node >> dies off >> with the following exception: >> >> 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: >> Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize >> (DistributedFileSystem.java:78) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java: >> 1373) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java: >> 66) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java: >> 1385) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier >> (NameNode.java:208) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize >> (NameNode.java:204) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode. >> (NameNode.java:279) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode >> (NameNode.java:956) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java: >> 965) >> >> Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example >> configuration files >> for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? >> >> The detail log file is attached along with. >> >> >> >> >> The configuration files are as follows: >> >> MASTER CONFIG >> ------ conf/masters ------- >> master_hadoop >> >> ------ conf/slaves ------- >> master_hadoop >> slave_hadoop >> >> ------ core-site.xml ------- >> >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> hadoop.tmp.dir >> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp >> >> >> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >> >> dfs.replication >> 2 >> >> >> >> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >> >> mapred.job.tracker >> tejas_hadoop:9001 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SLAVE CONFIG >> ------ core-site.xml ------- >> >> hadoop.tmp.dir >> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ >> >> >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >> >> dfs.replication >> 2 >> >> >> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >> >> mapred.job.tracker >> tejas_hadoop:9001 >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Tejas Lagvankar >> meettejas@umbc.edu >> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Chandan Tamrakar Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 From general-return-609-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 16:37:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56994 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 16:37:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 16:37:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12063 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:37:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11982 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:37:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11962 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 16:37:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:37:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:37:22 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so5796741iwn.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:37:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.120.90 with SMTP id c26mr435381ibr.1.1255451820502; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:37:00 +0000 Message-ID: <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem From: Kevin Sweeney To: Tejas Lagvankar Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, Chandan Tamrakar , jun hu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6480e08cb2faa0475d3a745 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6480e08cb2faa0475d3a745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 did you verify the name resolution? On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > > I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have tried with > port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. > > > Regards, > Tejas > > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: > > I think you need to specify the port as well for following port >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> >>> We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using the >>> new >>> 0.20.1 version. >>> >>> On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node dies >>> off >>> with the following exception: >>> >>> 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: >>> Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:78) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1373) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1385) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier(NameNode.java:208) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:204) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:956) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) >>> >>> Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration >>> files >>> for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? >>> >>> The detail log file is attached along with. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The configuration files are as follows: >>> >>> MASTER CONFIG >>> ------ conf/masters ------- >>> master_hadoop >>> >>> ------ conf/slaves ------- >>> master_hadoop >>> slave_hadoop >>> >>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>> >>> >>> >>> fs.default.name >>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>> >>> >>> >>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp >>> >>> >>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>> >>> dfs.replication >>> 2 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>> >>> mapred.job.tracker >>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> SLAVE CONFIG >>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>> >>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> fs.default.name >>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>> >>> dfs.replication >>> 2 >>> >>> >>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>> >>> mapred.job.tracker >>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tejas Lagvankar >>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Chandan Tamrakar >> > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > --0016e6480e08cb2faa0475d3a745-- From general-return-610-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 16:41:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57710 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 16:41:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 16:41:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18260 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:41:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18175 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 16:41:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18155 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 16:41:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:41:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.77 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.77] (HELO mx2.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.77) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:41:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx2.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DGf9Hb007267; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:41:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-71-179-71-29.bltmmd.east.verizon.net [71.179.71.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx2-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DGf7uv007253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:41:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6-119477132 From: Tejas Lagvankar In-Reply-To: <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:41:07 -0400 Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> To: Kevin Sweeney X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1255581670:3bb99aea61c9f3150b690e32e6d9b754 X-ClamAV: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-6-119477132 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes By name resolution, I assume that you mean the name mentioned in /etc/ hosts. Yes, in the logs, the IP address appears in the beginning. Correct me if I'm wrong I will also try with using just the IP's instead of the aliases. On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > did you verify the name resolution? > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Tejas Lagvankar > wrote: > > I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have tried > with port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. > > > Regards, > Tejas > > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: > > I think you need to specify the port as well for following port > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar > wrote: > > Hi, > > > We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using > the new > 0.20.1 version. > > On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node > dies off > with the following exception: > > 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: > Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize > (DistributedFileSystem.java:78) > at > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1373) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java: > 1385) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier > (NameNode.java:208) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize > (NameNode.java:204) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java: > 279) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode > (NameNode.java:956) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java: > 965) > > Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration > files > for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? > > The detail log file is attached along with. > > > > > The configuration files are as follows: > > MASTER CONFIG > ------ conf/masters ------- > master_hadoop > > ------ conf/slaves ------- > master_hadoop > slave_hadoop > > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > > > SLAVE CONFIG > ------ core-site.xml ------- > > hadoop.tmp.dir > /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ > > > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://master_hadoop > > > > ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- > > dfs.replication > 2 > > > ------ mapred-site.xml ------- > > mapred.job.tracker > tejas_hadoop:9001 > > > > > Regards, > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > > > > > -- > Chandan Tamrakar > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > > > > Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 --Apple-Mail-6-119477132-- From general-return-611-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 17:02:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66264 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 17:02:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 17:02:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 68070 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 17:02:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67986 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 17:02:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67967 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 17:02:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:02:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.79 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.79] (HELO mx4.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.79) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:01:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx4.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DH1UcI017313; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-71-179-71-29.bltmmd.east.verizon.net [71.179.71.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx4-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DH1Tqb017300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Tejas Lagvankar In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:29 -0400 Cc: Kevin Sweeney , common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <962B880C-EC03-40D7-AEFE-C0A6619D5BE8@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1255582890:faa1ceb86d3541179c132c8da7b5a473 X-ClamAV: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Kevin, You were right... I changed all my aliases to IP addresses. It worked ! Thank you all again :) Regards, Tejas On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > By name resolution, I assume that you mean the name mentioned in / > etc/hosts. Yes, in the logs, the IP address appears in the beginning. > Correct me if I'm wrong > I will also try with using just the IP's instead of the aliases. > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > >> did you verify the name resolution? >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Tejas Lagvankar >> wrote: >> >> I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have >> tried with port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. >> >> >> Regards, >> Tejas >> >> >> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: >> >> I think you need to specify the port as well for following port >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using >> the new >> 0.20.1 version. >> >> On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node >> dies off >> with the following exception: >> >> 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: >> Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize >> (DistributedFileSystem.java:78) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java: >> 1373) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java: >> 1385) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) >> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier >> (NameNode.java:208) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize >> (NameNode.java:204) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode. >> (NameNode.java:279) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode >> (NameNode.java:956) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java: >> 965) >> >> Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example >> configuration files >> for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? >> >> The detail log file is attached along with. >> >> >> >> >> The configuration files are as follows: >> >> MASTER CONFIG >> ------ conf/masters ------- >> master_hadoop >> >> ------ conf/slaves ------- >> master_hadoop >> slave_hadoop >> >> ------ core-site.xml ------- >> >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> hadoop.tmp.dir >> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp >> >> >> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >> >> dfs.replication >> 2 >> >> >> >> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >> >> mapred.job.tracker >> tejas_hadoop:9001 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> SLAVE CONFIG >> ------ core-site.xml ------- >> >> hadoop.tmp.dir >> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ >> >> >> >> >> fs.default.name >> hdfs://master_hadoop >> >> >> >> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >> >> dfs.replication >> 2 >> >> >> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >> >> mapred.job.tracker >> tejas_hadoop:9001 >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Tejas Lagvankar >> meettejas@umbc.edu >> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Chandan Tamrakar >> >> Tejas Lagvankar >> meettejas@umbc.edu >> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 From general-return-612-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 13 18:30:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92106 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2009 18:30:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2009 18:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 50127 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 18:30:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49589 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2009 18:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49475 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 18:30:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:30:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tej2@umbc.edu designates 130.85.25.77 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.85.25.77] (HELO mx2.umbc.edu) (130.85.25.77) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:30:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.umbc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbc.edu (mx2.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DITjdj008256; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:29:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wireless-217-247.wireless.umbc.edu (wireless-217-247.wireless.UMBC.EDU [130.85.217.247]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.umbc.edu (mx2-relay.umbc.edu) with ESMTP id n9DITi0J008253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Tejas Lagvankar In-Reply-To: <45f85f70910131050p50f11857o2984fc2d4cffd8b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:29:44 -0400 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Todd Lipcon Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <03571714-E395-4189-90A4-40C943457CF0@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> <962B880C-EC03-40D7-AEFE-C0A6619D5BE8@umbc.edu> <45f85f70910131050p50f11857o2984fc2d4cffd8b5@mail.gmail.com> To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Milter-Key: 1255588185:01d2f63ce28102aafde70949b388b578 X-ClamAV: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Todd, I never thought of that !! Regards, Tejas On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Your issue was probably that slave_hadoop and master_hadoop are not > valid > host names: > > RFCs mandate > that a > hostname's labels may contain only the > ASCIIletters 'a' through 'z' > (case-insensitive), the digits '0' through '9', and > the hyphen. Hostname labels cannot begin or end with a hyphen. No > other > symbols, punctuation characters, or blank spaces are permitted. > > from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname > > -Todd > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Tejas Lagvankar > wrote: > >> Hey Kevin, >> >> You were right... >> I changed all my aliases to IP addresses. It worked ! >> >> Thank you all again :) >> >> Regards, >> Tejas >> >> >> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: >> >> By name resolution, I assume that you mean the name mentioned in >>> /etc/hosts. Yes, in the logs, the IP address appears in the >>> beginning. >>> Correct me if I'm wrong >>> I will also try with using just the IP's instead of the aliases. >>> >>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: >>> >>> did you verify the name resolution? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Tejas Lagvankar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have >>>> tried with >>>> port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tejas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: >>>> >>>> I think you need to specify the port as well for following port >>>> >>>> >>>> fs.default.name >>>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) >>>> using the >>>> new >>>> 0.20.1 version. >>>> >>>> On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name >>>> node dies >>>> off >>>> with the following exception: >>>> >>>> 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: >>>> java.io.IOException: >>>> Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize >>>> (DistributedFileSystem.java:78) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java: >>>> 1373) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java: >>>> 1385) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier >>>> (NameNode.java:208) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize >>>> (NameNode.java:204) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode. >>>> (NameNode.java:279) >>>> at >>>> >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode >>>> (NameNode.java:956) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main >>>> (NameNode.java:965) >>>> >>>> Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example >>>> configuration >>>> files >>>> for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? >>>> >>>> The detail log file is attached along with. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The configuration files are as follows: >>>> >>>> MASTER CONFIG >>>> ------ conf/masters ------- >>>> master_hadoop >>>> >>>> ------ conf/slaves ------- >>>> master_hadoop >>>> slave_hadoop >>>> >>>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> fs.default.name >>>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> dfs.replication >>>> 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> mapred.job.tracker >>>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SLAVE CONFIG >>>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> fs.default.name >>>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> dfs.replication >>>> 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>>> >>>> mapred.job.tracker >>>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Tejas Lagvankar >>>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 < >>>> http://www.umbc.edu/%7Etej2> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chandan Tamrakar >>>> >>>> Tejas Lagvankar >>>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Tejas Lagvankar >>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Tejas Lagvankar >> meettejas@umbc.edu >> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >> >> >> >> Tejas Lagvankar meettejas@umbc.edu www.umbc.edu/~tej2 From general-return-613-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 02:01:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60605 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 02:01:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 02:01:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 20085 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 02:01:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20000 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 02:01:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19990 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 02:01:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:01:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:00:53 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n9E1xANG053276 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=PjvMXG9trwso9zoxFbVaZvyJQdb5v21U9jx/YRfXQGgLVCy6YrjCIybACjYUS8Io Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.185]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:59:09 -0700 Received: from 10.72.106.176 ([10.72.106.176]) by SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.166]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.248]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:59:10 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:59:08 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Kan Zhang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpMcepVWrv6ZArZ20GR5gnwIvfXLw== In-Reply-To: <4ACF956E.1000201@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2009 01:59:09.0693 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB5852D0:01CA4C71] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/9/09 12:56 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Sanjay Radia wrote: >> Will the RPC over HTTP be transparent so that that we can replace with a >> different layer if needed? > > Yes. > >> My worry was the separation of data and checksums; someone had mentioned >> that one could do this over 2 RPCs - that is not transparent. > > That was suggested as a possibility if we did not want to use RPC for > data, but rather raw HTTP, e.g., with a separate URL per block. The > zerocopy support built into most HTTP servers only supports entire > responses from a single file, so if we wanted to take advantage of these > zerocopy implementations we'd not use RPC for block access, but could > use HTTP and hence share security, etc. Using raw HTTP for block access > might also perform better, since it can use TCP flow control, rather > than RPC call/response. In my microbenchmarks, RPC call/response was > fast enough to easily saturate disks and networks, so that might be > moot, although RPC call/response for file data may use more CPU than > we'd like. With our own transport implementation we could get RPC > call/response to use zerocopy for file data. > One problem I see with using HTTP is that it's expensive to provide data encryption. We're currently adding 2 authentication mechanisms (Kerberos and DIGEST-MD5) to our existing RPC. Both of them can provide data encryption for subsequent communication over the authenticated channel. However, when similar authentication mechanisms are specified for HTTP (SPNEGO and HTTP DIGEST, respectively), they don't provide data encryption (correct me if I'm wrong). For data encryption over HTTP, one has to use SSL, which is expensive. Kan From general-return-614-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 06:05:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34184 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 06:05:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 06:05:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 85933 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 06:05:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85853 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 06:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85836 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 06:05:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:05:06 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so7994180pzk.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f5XxYZmHeJKkUaYS5zwAoBPLW/CW6UtMSkmGalSgYsk=; b=HQcgPdKM5yLdqZj1kGUfe4wy6VYFn4qhhDZGrTbZfKyvTfBCahSOQj8QVxdQPesF8V UiSqwORkzrzsd444kD4Bll1/wGjg1YJHjgORmsbLSsQIMV+c6XAY4XC67kYwBMn9EBx9 KWTa8PdGIExPmc4EKm4moh+f4UnG1cbKf7d4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gCbNKTX1Dq/oOg+3tGwtEX6d+2hf0K/HuY5pr+XUjYPRhGqGuYNOWItJGklrhZ3CGa UvIFE4PHsHg1/7Xu1IZPkJJ/D1TrnOidtp8jlpdFD7LPcG/9K26HLDeTYG+N8qRtM67+ 3i/SVA9Kwa3wwH2mmAyYa8qwwoVWyxB1B2HeQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.136.19 with SMTP id j19mr984370rvd.187.1255500285582; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:04:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <95f8b1a90910130905h38357b3fmd53c5a4b1c9ee5f8@mail.gmail.com> References: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> <8211a1320910130649y14b06a67s13b268f31f6f786e@mail.gmail.com> <95f8b1a90910130905h38357b3fmd53c5a4b1c9ee5f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:04:45 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910132304s2619b2b4hba0c4a83b76a65e8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Reading files from local file system From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2531a899e170475def0d6 --000e0cd2531a899e170475def0d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If you want to open a local file in hadoop you have 3 simple ways 1: use file:///path 2: get a LocalFileSystem object from the FileSystem /** * Get the local file syste * @param conf the configuration to configure the file system with * @return a LocalFileSystem */ public static LocalFileSystem getLocal(Configuration conf) throws IOException { return (LocalFileSystem)get(LocalFileSystem.NAME, conf); } 3: use the java.io File* classes. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > Do I need to change any configuration beside changing the default file > system to "local file system' ? > I am trying to input for example input.txt to map job > > input.txt will contain file location as following > > file://path/abc1.doc > file://path/abc2.doc > .. > ... > > map program will read each line from input.txt and process them > > Do i need to change any configuration ? This is similar to how Nutch crawls > . > > any feedbacks would be appreciated > > thanks > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > Maybe you could debug your mapreduce job in eclipse, since you run it in > > local mode. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We are trying to read files from local file system. But when running > the > > > map > > > reduce it is not able to read files from the input location (the input > > > location is also local file system location). > > > > > > For this we changed the configuration of the hadoop-site.xml as shown > > > below: > > > > > > /etc/conf/hadoop/hadoop-site.xml > > > > > > > > > fs.default.name > > > file:/// > > > > > > > > > > > > [admin@localhost ~]$ hadoop jar Test.jar /home/admin/input/test.txt > > > output1 > > > > > > Suppose Test.txt is pain text file that contains > > > Test1 > > > Test2 > > > Test3 > > > > > > > > > While running simple MapReduce job we get following exception "File > not > > > found exception " , we are using TextInputFormat in our Job > configuration > > > > > > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > > > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process > > > : 1 > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > process > > > : 1 > > > 09/10/13 17:26:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > > job_200910131447_0033 > > > 09/10/13 17:26:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > > 09/10/13 17:27:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > attempt_200910131447_0033_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > > java.io.FileNotFoundException: File > > file:/home/admin/Desktop/input/test.txt > > > does not exist. > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.jav > > > a:420) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:25 > > > 9) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.(Checks > > > umFileSystem.java:117) > > > at > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.open(ChecksumFileSystem.java:275) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:364) > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.(LineRecordReader.java:206) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat.getRecordReader(TextInputFormat.jav > > > a:50) > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:219) > > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) > > > > > > However, running in the code as a separate Main method does work well. > > > > > > public static void main (String [] args) throws IOException { > > > > > > Configuration conf = new Configuration(); > > > FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); > > > > > > Path filenamePath = new Path(theFilename); > > > FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path("abc.txt")); > > > out.writeUTF("abc"); > > > out.close(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > The above code works fine when running it as a jar in hadoop. The above > > > code > > > successfully creates file in /home/admin/abc.txt when running from > admin > > > user. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Chandan Tamrakar > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --000e0cd2531a899e170475def0d6-- From general-return-615-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 06:19:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38664 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 06:19:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 06:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 10764 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 06:19:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10675 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 06:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10665 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 06:19:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:19:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.197] (HELO mail-yx0-f197.google.com) (209.85.210.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:19:21 +0000 Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so8006163yxe.2 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:18:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.73.18 with SMTP id a18mr6888796anl.66.1255501079341; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:17:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <314098690910132304s2619b2b4hba0c4a83b76a65e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <314098690910120843j36dc05b7kb13fb42a1e633211@mail.gmail.com> <4ad4790d.1438560a.1db9.3612@mx.google.com> <8211a1320910130649y14b06a67s13b268f31f6f786e@mail.gmail.com> <95f8b1a90910130905h38357b3fmd53c5a4b1c9ee5f8@mail.gmail.com> <314098690910132304s2619b2b4hba0c4a83b76a65e8@mail.gmail.com> From: Chandan Tamrakar Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:02:39 +0545 Message-ID: <95f8b1a90910132317h87df034nf59b8a3c69cc0b9c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Reading files from local file system To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1d58d96cad0475df1f4e --0016368e1d58d96cad0475df1f4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Joson , i think it worked after changing these two paramters in hadoop-site.xml * 1. fs.default.name* used local file system as default file:/// *2. **mapred.job.tracker * previously were using hdfs location and removed now* *Thanks chandan * * On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Jason Venner wrote: > If you want to open a local file in hadoop you have 3 simple ways > > 1: use file:///path > 2: get a LocalFileSystem object from the FileSystem > /** > * Get the local file syste > * @param conf the configuration to configure the file system with > * @return a LocalFileSystem > */ > public static LocalFileSystem getLocal(Configuration conf) > throws IOException { > return (LocalFileSystem)get(LocalFileSystem.NAME, conf); > } > > 3: use the java.io File* classes. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > Do I need to change any configuration beside changing the default file > > system to "local file system' ? > > I am trying to input for example input.txt to map job > > > > input.txt will contain file location as following > > > > file://path/abc1.doc > > file://path/abc2.doc > > .. > > ... > > > > map program will read each line from input.txt and process them > > > > Do i need to change any configuration ? This is similar to how Nutch > crawls > > . > > > > any feedbacks would be appreciated > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > > Maybe you could debug your mapreduce job in eclipse, since you run it > in > > > local mode. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chandan Tamrakar < > > > chandan.tamrakar@nepasoft.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are trying to read files from local file system. But when running > > the > > > > map > > > > reduce it is not able to read files from the input location (the > input > > > > location is also local file system location). > > > > > > > > For this we changed the configuration of the hadoop-site.xml as shown > > > > below: > > > > > > > > /etc/conf/hadoop/hadoop-site.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > fs.default.name > > > > file:/// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [admin@localhost ~]$ hadoop jar Test.jar /home/admin/input/test.txt > > > > output1 > > > > > > > > Suppose Test.txt is pain text file that contains > > > > Test1 > > > > Test2 > > > > Test3 > > > > > > > > > > > > While running simple MapReduce job we get following exception "File > > not > > > > found exception " , we are using TextInputFormat in our Job > > configuration > > > > > > > > > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > > > > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the > same. > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > > process > > > > : 1 > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:35 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to > > > process > > > > : 1 > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:37 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: > > > job_200910131447_0033 > > > > 09/10/13 17:26:38 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > > > > 09/10/13 17:27:00 INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : > > > > attempt_200910131447_0033_m_000000_0, Status : FAILED > > > > java.io.FileNotFoundException: File > > > file:/home/admin/Desktop/input/test.txt > > > > does not exist. > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.RawLocalFileSystem.getFileStatus(RawLocalFileSystem.jav > > > > a:420) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.FilterFileSystem.getFileStatus(FilterFileSystem.java:25 > > > > 9) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.(Checks > > > > umFileSystem.java:117) > > > > at > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.open(ChecksumFileSystem.java:275) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.open(FileSystem.java:364) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.(LineRecordReader.java:206) > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat.getRecordReader(TextInputFormat.jav > > > > a:50) > > > > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:219) > > > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$Child.main(TaskTracker.java:2210) > > > > > > > > However, running in the code as a separate Main method does work > well. > > > > > > > > public static void main (String [] args) throws IOException { > > > > > > > > Configuration conf = new Configuration(); > > > > FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); > > > > > > > > Path filenamePath = new Path(theFilename); > > > > FSDataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path("abc.txt")); > > > > out.writeUTF("abc"); > > > > out.close(); > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > The above code works fine when running it as a jar in hadoop. The > above > > > > code > > > > successfully creates file in /home/admin/abc.txt when running from > > admin > > > > user. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Chandan Tamrakar > > > > > > -- > Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, > http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall > www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals > -- Chandan Tamrakar --0016368e1d58d96cad0475df1f4e-- From general-return-616-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 16:38:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27409 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 16:38:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 16:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 83290 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 16:37:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83210 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 16:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83199 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 16:37:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:37:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:37:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 27227 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 16:37:35 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.112]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:37:35 +0000 Message-ID: <4AD5FE4E.4040100@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:37:34 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HTTP transport? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kan Zhang wrote: > One problem I see with using HTTP is that it's expensive to provide data > encryption. We're currently adding 2 authentication mechanisms (Kerberos and > DIGEST-MD5) to our existing RPC. Both of them can provide data encryption > for subsequent communication over the authenticated channel. However, when > similar authentication mechanisms are specified for HTTP (SPNEGO and HTTP > DIGEST, respectively), they don't provide data encryption (correct me if I'm > wrong). For data encryption over HTTP, one has to use SSL, which is > expensive. Java supports using Kerberos-based encryption for TLS (nee SSL): http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jsse/JSSERefGuide.html#KRB http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2712 There's also a standard way to use tickets over TLS: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4507 Doug From general-return-617-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 16:50:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30034 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 16:50:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 16:50:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 14662 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 16:50:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14593 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 16:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14581 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 16:50:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:50:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:50:46 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9EGoMqV052261; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=S5CpKy2eZ9eYCy/9aXvDkZ5Cj0hleRgs1FAxPac0S+dso2sbTnHJFahwgm+DQzlQ Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:50:22 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:50:21 -0700 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Oct 21st) at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - next Wednesday (Oct 21st) at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCpfO4pA= Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, RSVP is still open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Y= ahoo! Sunnyvale Campus, next Wednesday (Oct 21st), 6PM Registration and Agenda are available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11532125/ Looking forward to seeing you next week! Dekel From general-return-618-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 17:13:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37716 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 17:13:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 17:13:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 78109 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78032 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78022 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 17:13:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:13:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 37565 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 17:12:48 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.112]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:12:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4AD6068E.5030902@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:12:46 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: new Avro Committer: Thiruvalluvan M. G. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Hadoop PMC has voted to make Thiruvalluvan M. G. an Avro committer. Congratulations, Thiru! Doug From general-return-619-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 17:39:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45745 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 17:39:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 17:39:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26756 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26652 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26629 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 17:39:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:39:02 +0000 Received: from [10.73.152.71] (snvvpn2-10-73-152-c71.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.152.71]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9EHcRlf078911; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD60C93.9080005@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:38:27 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org CC: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: new Avro Committer: Thiruvalluvan M. G. References: <4AD6068E.5030902@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AD6068E.5030902@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Congrats Thiru! Doug Cutting wrote: > The Hadoop PMC has voted to make Thiruvalluvan M. G. an Avro committer. > > Congratulations, Thiru! > > Doug From general-return-620-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 14 17:46:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47637 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 17:46:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 17:46:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 40188 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40096 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 17:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40079 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 17:46:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:46:26 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9EHk21R083215 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:46:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id: thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originalarrivaltime; b=IqBBOp+6ea+2J/84S0qYV7Mukhnij/mQLQwfjPA41ikqohFNVceWFL5sly66oZ4q Received: from SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.185]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:46:02 -0700 Received: from 10.72.106.176 ([10.72.106.176]) by SNV-EXVS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.166]) via Exchange Front-End Server snv-webmail.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.248]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:46:02 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:45:57 -0700 Subject: Re: HTTP transport? From: Kan Zhang To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: HTTP transport? Thread-Index: AcpM9i8jd/kiWS0OlkWWGuv5+qimEw== In-Reply-To: <4AD5FE4E.4040100@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2009 17:46:02.0311 (UTC) FILETIME=[324DDD70:01CA4CF6] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10/14/09 9:37 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: > Kan Zhang wrote: >> One problem I see with using HTTP is that it's expensive to provide data >> encryption. We're currently adding 2 authentication mechanisms (Kerberos and >> DIGEST-MD5) to our existing RPC. Both of them can provide data encryption >> for subsequent communication over the authenticated channel. However, when >> similar authentication mechanisms are specified for HTTP (SPNEGO and HTTP >> DIGEST, respectively), they don't provide data encryption (correct me if I'm >> wrong). For data encryption over HTTP, one has to use SSL, which is >> expensive. > > Java supports using Kerberos-based encryption for TLS (nee SSL): > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/jsse/JSSERefGuide.html#KRB > This addresses part of my concern (the Kerberos part). I wasn't aware Java already supports it. Thanks for pointing it out. Kan From general-return-621-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 05:19:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78231 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 05:19:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 05:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 93331 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 05:19:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93244 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 05:19:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93234 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 05:19:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:19:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.180] (HELO web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:19:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 53400 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Oct 2009 05:18:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255583937; bh=RqskSXy4Vh7zh5cJRY+Lhsd0z0yyM//t38vtYu0h+lk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0wFPKRV336vievS0g/I6C+uDpdmw6gxD6ROZGl7hKfXnkXuPzTe6nKk5vsnCClJqrgzwg0MGLBopRTjDelcuoF+73bmB9aoiSra921yn9Su075btNmcYEZYrnh5fPbV8hlqIu4P7vCPoP3hpFpBFt6NUeG99Esx6Vtb8v3Ay43k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZEq2nuwBx2s7r8DGmR0qrvChIVAHrqZZjPDuMAKoOBtz4YjUTrs8iQg03i4ga4EWanAHiaGbG0Vv/JQjc6NFXJNTNUsOUdBZDBPJd91SyClTjp+p6X4S8bJYubRDWZBaIwPOxTVKMARkaZ4tq1M5bz5RYarfS8n1N+dzwZRykqY=; Message-ID: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KGvXRfwVM1mM3IkZGXwMPqZNLrHFUHpe_DrdD_pG3GgJNIfkLOHjm0tdurp2UdIHSj6TTvRoEv9tesSEYbOXXENnd5jFpzDa_kzv7swj6yKnPXHB9xiB6xNaSXRzdmUpFMtHIilF9Ls36V0O.WX5TDiy8Xhu5Ghvzo.o4pedM4IPkctDsIQjTqQTpc_1wsRUNZi35XEdnnTjZTGSjQSGVVJ0XSHS2YylXTz2Sh.VEGFWBPg_kxO6vy0oE4wTnB8.9UGhCMdSSERyYHua1GMFWZfeuGCN5GXlGTK0QBFY5VszksRNyf7oSfrrM669atBQd0RL404rC5vAYroAFBToSaw- Received: from [24.130.194.117] by web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:18:57 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:18:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-977925582-1255583937=:52565" --0-977925582-1255583937=:52565 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an inpu= t file or from a database. =A0I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mappe= r & Reducer to work on. =A0Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 dif= ferent tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat becaus= e everything I need is already on HBase.=A0 How can I do this? =A0Please let me know. =A0Thanks. =0A=0A=0A --0-977925582-1255583937=:52565-- From general-return-622-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 05:37:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82155 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 05:37:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 05:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22081 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 05:37:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22029 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 05:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22019 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 05:37:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.174] (HELO web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:37:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 37746 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Oct 2009 05:36:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255585007; bh=nABdlWToyFLJnK4GLib7Or57U27PWEckyNU3myQQdnE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=L0USam2fo9CbNpl2SLRxCQWhjkWwCHq6SSXfNmaCoKBP6+UaD52ZBuCWzqdH5hc6IgEtAg8gG52P2zft/WzGeVuTlKacAi1PbpOkZNVGj/ykcjunuKzyl2vW3REWhrbcxr++wJc/65n2w0Jm09OvNHdiA7pOos43RcxzWHaFJuA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZROh+vvhJcDAEaPp+32zQgTToKyKVnWNx2MVTTAtGCiYp+sJYqPeXMU/TY+w5ZAX6oVlzFiGZqKNMEzLkA4L772LK2+1V6zC0+XhxlKe2JkG0gdkSn2hU1mx/JoZI2J151KmF5Gu5RvZTelPR8FQfriXwGfQAQbEkX8mUtjrLcY=; Message-ID: <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: NJEVop4VM1nKka.Sy0l5bkdOJRAGbHr4d.I8jLK0MP25OKFcrltwgkgDFUb94YhB9yyY9kQUVgjn7sggtNVlLp5GPpDn5jkH5fKd0ZYUbLNBHZaHY4bPtmCIsmgw0JVJBoM7H_z5gVPbCn_gaxsSxviOS5wZZM7Y2ozMYRIEpr8Y_OTIq0.a.lkG1Xtr4UmcqJryzfD6z2CfsOe4aX9USWDOKmDxmOwRs9UsJnuhpiXLnXFh7HYHkBcRlFRKU.s4_88p.wf0C2ngcTSLKfzUbzAQRDqY0ThXFbjnZWT00kfi8aFaAtoPTY_vj24HM_n8.hptyvApApqc5Wt3UxIn9s_9MT69wND7snGmOHp3Msc7EEEu4wQO.Iw- Received: from [24.130.194.117] by web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:36:47 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:36:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-6914967-1255585007=:37510" --0-6914967-1255585007=:37510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If the answer is... TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob I apologize for the spam. =A0If this isn't the right way, please let me kno= w. =A0Thanks. --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an inpu= t file or from a database. =A0I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mappe= r & Reducer to work on. =A0Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 dif= ferent tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat becaus= e everything I need is already on HBase.=A0 How can I do this? =A0Please let me know. =A0Thanks. =A0 =A0 =A0 =0A=0A=0A --0-6914967-1255585007=:37510-- From general-return-623-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 06:12:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92481 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 06:12:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 06:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 50326 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 06:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50252 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 06:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50242 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 06:12:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:12:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:12:01 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so532043pzk.2 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:11:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=feQDrzGstUGR/hxKcMOv4TlhaUJVRv3/bJteAI6Myi4=; b=S1cXcBHeJbfbbC0X5tXmDMY5sEo0+1S4z2fWkYm7KXqyMXjlUZ50veX/HqtasREC3d ph/o3aVSVsvBZVo+B3mHhdBOctGKVuFDkC6ypzbTKfX/vmC7Ex9zvbtK1Vn19XljWmTO a55ITOYsw1qUqBDMzJxh1wtDtPzq9Q3AZ5kzM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=U7bg3K2/IBliTgWPQbeNUpt0GSE/FtY9m93Dme8yXUFi5RaobLdNG+mdyPPrneqz6j x3DgDFu3SLi2Pu86vN9QFjOKaCMlEIoceKPheFLgS4z08Cyi8vFnphgasZU6NZpDMkkx o4tAn5OPaMeY3ZK7VNzBFppPSjf12mR/iy4MQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.133.7 with SMTP id g7mr1060602rvd.169.1255587100330; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:11:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:11:40 -0700 Message-ID: <314098690910142311j1cb65dap4c048e91d7f0c58b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd25310198cb40475f3271f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd25310198cb40475f3271f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am doing something similar where I have a million input files to process, I provide a single text file as input and use NLineInputFormat, specifying the number of lines that are sent to each map task. In your case you would set it so that 1 line was one input split, which is the default. In pre 20, the parameter is mapred.line.input.format.linespermap. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Something Something < luckyguy2050@yahoo.com> wrote: > If the answer is... > > TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob > > I apologize for the spam. If this isn't the right way, please let me know. > Thanks. > > > --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: > > From: Something Something > Subject: Question about MapReduce > To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM > > I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an > input file or from a database. I would like to pass 3 arguments to the > Mapper & Reducer to work on. Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 > different tables on HBase. > > In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat > because everything I need is already on HBase. > > How can I do this? Please let me know. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals --000e0cd25310198cb40475f3271f-- From general-return-624-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 18:31:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4669 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 18:31:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 18:31:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 61378 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 18:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61308 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 18:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61288 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 18:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.204] (HELO web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:31:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 50946 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Oct 2009 18:30:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255631459; bh=u7/RQRPxKRrAAe86bLiqX8r7GaKMFA2R0YRw/nJCPAE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hojEtSmjKIxaMcXbUBh6tolMScU/TU0K1CcrNLhEkfgTubhFxGo5TDsRLH9QDh+nqIfRcmly9p5kceCInAm5zxesi48yP6rqhFH1it8xXPDA10RkPNorIsslkjnz7tG7kMwLfRWlu5WzVL0xkwjIn2g/PF261l2Go8A1j3oIGIg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s+jfusG8PPmNBFYvOyFIB5Kd/7HERF1yJ2R5eoaoUqR45dpWik4oH7wKprl4vm3MBLaS5IsHBZHR1b95v0E8Osi9fHsXn0S/mo414Fk5OuDjCX5diti82mcwBvhj5Y3bk7RqZO1zZTzcbLn0cvJ+dUmCrPhXeDIVnViw5KtF+0w=; Message-ID: <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: _8rmYAEVM1lDfFcpUR5.PRBbgA3x2P6hezC_puh2wbaczjvjfg.Je2BqLoUN6B2o4gzxS1GX19RoaCf13mtTeQbIH1Xc4811XTXYSKvJzJrNhQ9xENLVmwHn_6ceJx4znpNdoqegUXcOHujBGQjyR_tO3LSSrzSUtXG7KpCrHp_qBO._73.NLB7T8DGyO9_ykCh7i_zE9MF6mNEoVq7MnX5lGH_6L9ZvhgssfAwOOCeQIm7S.qsZYFSb3lZHtU_7aymUrR8IHxCUvUUYoHcCu059kj4BpVdZf6oZQaX11NTGoA7ZiO8PmoRqE4I._9bOMkH3B9h2E2kmC1PxP3lrSxSRQGx8iwBqBWBI8X_r5c_UjwMRQqTyg5eZrsa_oq4- Received: from [216.239.45.4] by web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:30:59 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/182.10 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, Hadoop In-Reply-To: <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-593399548-1255631459=:50875" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-593399548-1255631459=:50875 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 1) I don't think TableInputFormat is useful in this case. Looks like it's used for scanning columns from a single HTable. 2) TableMapReduceUtil - same problem. Seems like this works with just one table. 3) JV recommended NLineInputFormat, but my parameters are not in a file. They come from multiple files and are in memory. I guess what I am looking for is something like... InMemoryInputFormat... similar to FileInputFormat & DbInputFormat. There's no such class right now. Worse comes to worst, I can write the parameters into a flat file, and use FileInputFormat - but that will slow down this process considerably. Is there no other way? ________________________________ From: Mark Vigeant To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 7:21:40 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce There is a tableInputFormat class in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableInputFormat Also, if you want to use TableMapReduceUtil you probably want to have your mapper function extend TableMapper. Check out the javadocs for more info: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:37 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce If the answer is... TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob I apologize for the spam. If this isn't the right way, please let me know. Thanks. --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an input file or from a database. I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mapper & Reducer to work on. Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 different tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat because everything I need is already on HBase. How can I do this? Please let me know. Thanks. --0-593399548-1255631459=:50875-- From general-return-625-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 21:21:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68487 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 21:21:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 21:21:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77338 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 21:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77256 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 21:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77246 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 21:21:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:21:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.144] (HELO web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:21:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 41727 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Oct 2009 21:20:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255641645; bh=ILc7oVm8JyvwmYA/ST32F8QjslGjZVoKk+tKrshz6DA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cAv1scPVEViW5DBJThuGBaNqpEohUfKX9QFvrM00zPCfdKNajPppHHaPG8PCANIY0Qq/yMivx7wB4Cb7b1zUn0+COoaSXYMpZy9yNG461+1H14Bcqs5qNOanjaFtNVrgD2MNV5EtILROVhy7NqzCmiiNvc8lWIAqlPWUjO1cWTQ= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fJHtMwBFBsjZmn3MWM+F+TPObvld5oGAyBxa0sEBwuZ0Anp4kbtzQe7yIox9N5n97aP/NP3nKzw+0/La125FawwyLzZxa78zTpZBZszK6xflVl06/ub3OS/YhCbYcW8nj3kT7rgEvPaU4XqSFRojIhZANkFiUw5n+NYGmL1Pzkg=; Message-ID: <984481.41505.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Kbxl1WEVM1nyjdCA4aseBPzw83dMb02luWdEXfma9coitLAXlic8PIADcUBp8c7Jy24E383lzS634_4kSL26MdDK2k6scvYKDZRk2yoNffmzRgJn9i1gv24XMRDO9hwB37a4KJ3rejzVP5SOYXOp.uuIkR06BW4WVCIYjtfV7EZem0X_7SeCuBIkKozPBatzGAlLhDDPGvYwyzshC1dbN9i8QeXcPFfIM96oF.zVM5Gzbhx9gsZmw0mhGbwRh1TaFynzJZjIyXjIc2B4x2P6bGrJ1wvV39aC0fWoqcLwXw4U9pG7f1oJi4mzA.AjyRJ5d0SD6CU_z497fVNDHuJqjcSGSbiao6gfyWO4QLI_B3csvugGvlGzGzY_ Received: from [216.239.45.4] by web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:20:45 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/182.10 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:20:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1820193207-1255641645=:41505" --0-1820193207-1255641645=:41505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have 3 HTables.... Table1, Table2 & Table3. I have 3 different flat files. One contains keys for Table1, 2nd contains keys for Table2 & 3rd contains keys for Table3. Use case: For every combination of these 3 keys, I need to perform some complex calculation and save the result in another HTable. In other words, I need to calculate values for the following combos: (1,1,1) (1,1,2)....... (1,1,N) (1,2,1) (1,3,1) & so on.... So I figured the best way to do this is to start a MapReduce Job for each of these combinations. The MapReduce will get (Key1, Key2, Key3) as input, then read Table1, Table2 & Table3 with these keys and perform the calculations. Is this the correct approach? If it is, I need to pass Key1, Key2 & Key3 to the Mapper & Reducer. What's the best way to do this? At this time, I don't need to join these tables in MapReduce, but in future I might have to. Thanks. ________________________________ From: Kevin Peterson To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 11:39:22 AM Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Something Something < luckyguy2050@yahoo.com> wrote: > 1) I don't think TableInputFormat is useful in this case. Looks like it's > used for scanning columns from a single HTable. > 2) TableMapReduceUtil - same problem. Seems like this works with just one > table. > 3) JV recommended NLineInputFormat, but my parameters are not in a file. > They come from multiple files and are in memory. > > I guess what I am looking for is something like... InMemoryInputFormat... > similar to FileInputFormat & DbInputFormat. There's no such class right > now. > > Worse comes to worst, I can write the parameters into a flat file, and use > FileInputFormat - but that will slow down this process considerably. Is > there no other way? > > So you need to pull input from multiple tables at once? Are you expecting to do a join on these tables? If you explain what the data looks like, we'd understand better. What are your tables, and what would you like to treat as a single input record? --0-1820193207-1255641645=:41505-- From general-return-626-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 21:45:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78159 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 21:45:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 21:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18251 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 21:45:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18172 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 21:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18162 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 21:45:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:45:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.222.195 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of kpeterson@biz360.com) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:45:18 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1190724pzk.2 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:44:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.4.41 with SMTP id 41mr63053wfd.123.1255643098395; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:44:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <984481.41505.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <984481.41505.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:44:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce From: Kevin Peterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b443d835f604760030ee --00504502b443d835f604760030ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Something Something wrote: > I have 3 HTables.... Table1, Table2 & Table3. > I have 3 different flat files. One contains keys for Table1, 2nd contains > keys for Table2 & 3rd contains keys for Table3. > > Use case: For every combination of these 3 keys, I need to perform some > complex calculation and save the result in another HTable. In other words, > I need to calculate values for the following combos: > > (1,1,1) (1,1,2)....... (1,1,N) (1,2,1) (1,3,1) & so on.... > > So I figured the best way to do this is to start a MapReduce Job for each > of these combinations. The MapReduce will get (Key1, Key2, Key3) as input, > then read Table1, Table2 & Table3 with these keys and perform the > calculations. Is this the correct approach? If it is, I need to pass Key1, > Key2 & Key3 to the Mapper & Reducer. What's the best way to do this? > > So you need the Cartesian product of all these files. My recommendation: Run three jobs which each read one of these files and set a flag in the row of the appropriate table. This way, you don't need the files at all, you just read some "flag:active" column in the tables. Next, pick one of the tables. It doesn't really matter which one from a logical standpoint, you could say table1, you could pick the one with the most data in it, or you may pick the one iwth the most individual entries flagged. Use it as input to tableinputformat, with a filter that only passes through those rows that are flagged. In the mapper, create a scanner over each of the other two columns using the same filter. You have two nested loops inside your map. In the innermost loop, be sure to updated a counter or call progress() to avoid the jobtracker timing out. Use tableoutputformat from that job to write to your output table. Depending on what exactly it means when you get a row key in your original input files, the next time through you will likely need to go through and clear all the flags before starting the process again. You definitely will not be starting multiple map reduce jobs. You will have one map reduce job that iterates through all the possible combinations, and your goal needs to be to make sure that the task can be split up enough that it can be parallelized. --00504502b443d835f604760030ee-- From general-return-627-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 15 23:14:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3113 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 23:14:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 23:14:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 28576 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 23:14:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28507 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 23:14:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28497 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 23:14:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:14:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:13:56 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so1339867ywh.5 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:13:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Zwd554yg3ysETcD0cSddit0Hglhk8eVK4vvMSORcO2U=; b=CJDa98CikV0abOWrsvnYtSTObDDfs7KhgWW7ON+5c6ITEdrRPy8RezRnnNfHzgSITY dF+p2umg+1jG/ftX08GeeQWAo00MycilQiYBvSlsGwEvHSxDs0yPHxEZZuyvi/casW9a K09KCk6gNYFdqhdGMHD/X0d8scLc2Ihi/Dm4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j1AAE2fApF8GxreiDapnzCtEnDzWEUwdq7/dUlhQgracQGhvQ94wuyCXASnitqVhze GO+I8tpwZrON7MNif6QFe6n66FKMx1lewGlVKyS3sFYTL8OHjcUVugt7tCMFgG66C3TG zBSD73a0R27QGtwNp7eCJye07SPORCMdEB/gs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.239.15 with SMTP id m15mr1446152ybh.109.1255648415603; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:13:35 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910151613k4742fe1dpb0a9028ac6229c2c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop 3 projects - how to reconcile the duplicated files? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org While trying to bring up hadoop 0.21 from source, I noted that there is a bunch of duplicate files between the projects. The config directory for example. Also hadoop-mapreduce seems to build webapps/datanode for some reason (?!). Someone on irc mentioned using 'ant tar', but it seems to be currently broken, since it (a) requires forrest and (b) forrest fails to build the docs on OSX 10.6.1, complaining about some datatype nonsense. What is the new standard for building a distribution? From general-return-628-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 00:32:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21039 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 00:32:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 00:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 1369 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 00:32:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1309 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 00:32:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1299 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 00:32:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:32:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.192] (HELO web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:32:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 52077 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Oct 2009 00:31:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255653106; bh=ckpuDYO/kRdoyqYAoDvM85sQeEJV6/GxS4D2jIORqzQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=peHOJYdkXmQ8poLurZgte13sIUW+rtQshn796/b5QXhKKsEKPWoRPOdlwwuGg3Tpx2LW3F5JLGquPVZLNN1SMB4cHSH2UcrLjortXuD8bhpKr7QoArtPYqqWgHGg4/QTQtzsFJn25XfZ1gqx66lq4NtlAAcQjuAzRhwczYzFuFU= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2kblX+DAgT7rut0CRYdfm+hILn94zH2vE3USDs0hnrVbNFTkGSnqvl4fJBnZVoagm/LBeK7L7pofWgVT6YUZ8WCj5D3qdj8He8m6WzobDnMWTLIA7Av06viZAo6WgUiJacmdctizIrJXCyXWzjvjbwrUILFvv5RJ0VQ9K8sjPgY=; Message-ID: <515249.51532.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: X_ovcKEVM1nkxwQeVueK_cWXTYPcOqoT_JTY691O5DyhrCmcofmcyeO4Asu7UT6uITGMo__43KllgqJMMEP3CnS0YwDE9m37tD0mRmYuTqIm5.Mj2SqX6xPnS3thkD.9aEprWcgSFpry.935ISrgb1TTTAT8G.l.hHgo.aj40SD.YZI9D5Y18Wvi_tUaH355BA61fXibbtEa4rhPS36.5RDs64XeTr2ridOSfdh4o98sCbqulmLFEU0o8e9.zzkJfVc4EDtHmiDF1MjsmvDAWaY5KMPiqIxaOOZRP6WsHnSA8UAAFsP2MwmgNpG4qsHKxXNvFB36k_G1iHK4DWssSDyT.vprTCY6uIh4_VE7UzxGHmZdk_ATWtXc Received: from [67.218.102.207] by web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:31:46 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/182.10 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <984481.41505.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-593719154-1255653106=:51532" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-593719154-1255653106=:51532 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kevin - Interesting way to solve the problem, but I don't think this solution is bullet-proof. While the MapReduce is running, someone may modify the "flag" and that will completely change the outcome - unless of course there's some way in HBase to lock this column. Amandeep - I was hoping to do this without writing to a flat file since the data I need is already in memory. Also, I am not sure what you mean by "Why are you using HBase?" I am using it because that's where the data I need for calculations is. ________________________________ From: Kevin Peterson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 2:44:58 PM Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Something Something wrote: > I have 3 HTables.... Table1, Table2 & Table3. > I have 3 different flat files. One contains keys for Table1, 2nd contains > keys for Table2 & 3rd contains keys for Table3. > > Use case: For every combination of these 3 keys, I need to perform some > complex calculation and save the result in another HTable. In other words, > I need to calculate values for the following combos: > > (1,1,1) (1,1,2)....... (1,1,N) (1,2,1) (1,3,1) & so on.... > > So I figured the best way to do this is to start a MapReduce Job for each > of these combinations. The MapReduce will get (Key1, Key2, Key3) as input, > then read Table1, Table2 & Table3 with these keys and perform the > calculations. Is this the correct approach? If it is, I need to pass Key1, > Key2 & Key3 to the Mapper & Reducer. What's the best way to do this? > > So you need the Cartesian product of all these files. My recommendation: Run three jobs which each read one of these files and set a flag in the row of the appropriate table. This way, you don't need the files at all, you just read some "flag:active" column in the tables. Next, pick one of the tables. It doesn't really matter which one from a logical standpoint, you could say table1, you could pick the one with the most data in it, or you may pick the one iwth the most individual entries flagged. Use it as input to tableinputformat, with a filter that only passes through those rows that are flagged. In the mapper, create a scanner over each of the other two columns using the same filter. You have two nested loops inside your map. In the innermost loop, be sure to updated a counter or call progress() to avoid the jobtracker timing out. Use tableoutputformat from that job to write to your output table. Depending on what exactly it means when you get a row key in your original input files, the next time through you will likely need to go through and clear all the flags before starting the process again. You definitely will not be starting multiple map reduce jobs. You will have one map reduce job that iterates through all the possible combinations, and your goal needs to be to make sure that the task can be split up enough that it can be parallelized. --0-593719154-1255653106=:51532-- From general-return-629-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 13:26:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 457 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 13:26:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 13:26:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 59490 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 13:26:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59395 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 13:26:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59375 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 13:26:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:26:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.2.179] (HELO exprod7og113.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:26:25 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.188]) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSth0a4+flmWmlK6SJuVJO9Bg0q2HAOr2@postini.com; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:26:04 PDT Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so1221951iwn.5 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.42.150 with SMTP id s22mr2947477ibe.22.1255699563231; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:26:03 +0300 Message-ID: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. From: Vitaliy Avdeev To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517741a14693b1004760d56c9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001517741a14693b1004760d56c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello. I have such situation. I neet to write gui on Java for editing core-site.xml. For getting an editing data I am using org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. But when i saving data from it such with writeXML() method atributes such as true are lost. Is org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration supports such atributes? --001517741a14693b1004760d56c9-- From general-return-630-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 16:11:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65867 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 16:11:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 16:11:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 1387 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1315 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:11:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1305 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 16:11:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:26 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1855130pzk.2 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:11:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.2.12 with SMTP id 12mr1665097wab.52.1255709465120; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:11:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> References: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:10:45 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think you meant to use "", not "finaly". See the "Final Parameters" section of http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/api/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.html . On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > Hello. I have such situation. I neet to write gui on Java for editing > core-site.xml. > For getting an editing data I am using org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > class. > But when i saving data from it such with writeXML() method atributes such as > true are lost. > Is org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration supports such atributes? > From general-return-631-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 16:20:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70995 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 16:20:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 16:20:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 22136 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:20:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22062 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:20:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22052 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 16:20:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:20:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.2.179] (HELO exprod7og113.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:20:40 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.197]) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKStidQ77TBDYU3q7UeUBES85LRK1TF9SI@postini.com; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:20:20 PDT Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so1254055iwn.26 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:20:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.117.215 with SMTP id s23mr5383277ibq.41.1255710018996; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:20:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> References: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:20:18 +0300 Message-ID: <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. From: Vitaliy Avdeev To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636920ca99f8a4c04760fc589 --001636920ca99f8a4c04760fc589 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes I meant final. But why when I am using Configuration.writeXML(out) there is no parameters in saved file? On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: > I think you meant to use "", not "finaly". See the "Final > Parameters" section of > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/api/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.html > . > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > > Hello. I have such situation. I neet to write gui on Java for editing > > core-site.xml. > > For getting an editing data I am using > org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration > > class. > > But when i saving data from it such with writeXML() method atributes such > as > > true are lost. > > Is org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration supports such atributes? > > > --001636920ca99f8a4c04760fc589-- From general-return-632-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 16:46:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79394 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 16:46:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 16:46:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 54706 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54618 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54601 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 16:46:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:46:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:46:42 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so1788893pxi.5 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.9.3 with SMTP id 3mr1691658wai.1.1255711581941; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> References: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:44:33 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100910160944w6b0b4ee6g5b467eca6a819f6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I looked at the code: you're right in what you're seeing---Configuration.writeXml doesn't write the final attribute. It's mostly used for serialization a job's configuration when necessary, and it doesn't need to preserve final in that context. -- Philip On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > Yes I meant final. > But why when I am using =A0Configuration.writeXML(out) there is no =A0 > parameters in saved file? > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Philip Zeyliger wro= te: > >> I think you meant to use "", not "finaly". =A0See the "Final >> Parameters" section of >> >> http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.1/api/org/apache/hadoop/conf/= Configuration.html >> . >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrot= e: >> > Hello. I have such situation. I neet to write gui on Java for editing >> > core-site.xml. >> > For getting an editing data I am using >> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration >> > class. >> > But when i saving data from it such with writeXML() method atributes s= uch >> as >> > true are lost. >> > Is org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration supports such atributes? >> > >> > From general-return-633-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 16:57:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82997 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 78967 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78896 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78886 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:57:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:57:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c90.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.90]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9GGuYrq090825 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=mzmCL/vFQWFh9AYzYoakThAyebR8Tk3cFyVkRFgjmtz8riqRpC4V2uvdu4d4o1D4 Message-Id: <7AEF9819-E5D3-40EA-96BE-7724EC942C45@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:56:34 -0700 References: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > Yes I meant final. > But why when I am using Configuration.writeXML(out) there is no > > parameters in saved file? This was a conscious decision we made in HADOOP-785. The idea is that a Configuration is serialized from the 'client context'. The client configuration is always loaded on 'top' of the configuration stack at runtime on the server (either at the JobTracker on job-submission or at the TaskTracker during task-execution) and thus the notion of 'final' parameters is moot. Having said that you do have a valid cause for complaint; I've recently been involved in some discussions with the Pig team where we concluded that this feature could be useful during task localization on the TaskTracker i.e. the TaskTracker should set the 'localized' parameters of the task to be 'final'. The short end of the stick is I'd request you to open a jira asking for this enhancement... please? thanks, Arun From general-return-634-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 17:00:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84876 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 17:00:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 17:00:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 87512 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:00:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87444 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87434 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 17:00:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:00:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:00:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.71] (snvvpn3-10-72-76-c90.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.76.90]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9GGxXRN092378 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=ImhhgLOqnejqvkQxzGNWqUFbLEBy5KE1MrKjVXIF6odnjWm5vAszcONC37TS5GKV Message-Id: From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <78568af10910151613k4742fe1dpb0a9028ac6229c2c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop 3 projects - how to reconcile the duplicated files? Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:59:34 -0700 References: <78568af10910151613k4742fe1dpb0a9028ac6229c2c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ryan, On Oct 15, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > While trying to bring up hadoop 0.21 from source, I noted that there > is a bunch of duplicate files between the projects. The config > directory for example. Also hadoop-mapreduce seems to build > webapps/datanode for some reason (?!) I agree that there are still some rough edges with the project- split, something we are working to solve. > Someone on irc mentioned using 'ant tar', but it seems to be currently > broken, since it (a) requires forrest and (b) forrest fails to build > the docs on OSX 10.6.1, complaining about some datatype nonsense. > > What is the new standard for building a distribution? AFAIK the only issue with the 'ant docs' target (which 'ant target' relies on) is that you need java1.5 - if you can confirm this isn't the case would you mind opening a jira? thanks, Arun From general-return-635-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 17:15:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90170 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 17:15:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 17:15:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 13740 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:15:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13653 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:15:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 17:15:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:15:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:15:30 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1902051pzk.2 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:15:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.80.6 with SMTP id h6mr1700294wal.108.1255713309838; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:15:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <78568af10910151613k4742fe1dpb0a9028ac6229c2c@mail.gmail.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:14:49 -0700 Message-ID: <15da8a100910161014vdd50480ub20e7f7ba14d9b19@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 3 projects - how to reconcile the duplicated files? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > AFAIK the only issue with the 'ant docs' target (which 'ant target' relies > on) is that you need java1.5 - if you can confirm this isn't the case would > you mind opening a jira? The magic you want is to add something like the following to your ant command line. -Dforrest.home=~/pub/apache-forrest-0.8/bin/forrest -Dfindbugs.home=$HOME/pub/findbugs-1.3.8 -Djava5.home=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5/Home and obviously you need to download findbugs and forrest themselves. (Avro manages to download them via ivy; that might be a sensible improvement.) -- Philip From general-return-636-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 17:37:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98300 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 17:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 54839 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54793 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50602 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2009 17:51:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <962B880C-EC03-40D7-AEFE-C0A6619D5BE8@umbc.edu> References: <8E86E890-7D86-4CB0-A525-5CF056265717@umbc.edu> <95f8b1a90910130912s2887e513ne68e5728e152dadb@mail.gmail.com> <4BE1D299-6474-4159-9532-82B523024629@umbc.edu> <6e8dca540910130937r27557455h42feefcad01376c5@mail.gmail.com> <962B880C-EC03-40D7-AEFE-C0A6619D5BE8@umbc.edu> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:50:13 -0700 Message-ID: <45f85f70910131050p50f11857o2984fc2d4cffd8b5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.20.1 Cluster Setup Problem To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, Kevin Sweeney Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64714a4ce239f0475d4ae67 --0016e64714a4ce239f0475d4ae67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Your issue was probably that slave_hadoop and master_hadoop are not valid host names: RFCs mandate that a hostname's labels may contain only the ASCIIletters 'a' through 'z' (case-insensitive), the digits '0' through '9', and the hyphen. Hostname labels cannot begin or end with a hyphen. No other symbols, punctuation characters, or blank spaces are permitted. from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname -Todd On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > You were right... > I changed all my aliases to IP addresses. It worked ! > > Thank you all again :) > > Regards, > Tejas > > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: > > By name resolution, I assume that you mean the name mentioned in >> /etc/hosts. Yes, in the logs, the IP address appears in the beginning. >> Correct me if I'm wrong >> I will also try with using just the IP's instead of the aliases. >> >> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: >> >> did you verify the name resolution? >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: >>> >>> I get the same error even if i specify the port number. I have tried with >>> port numbers 54310 as well as 9000. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tejas >>> >>> >>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Chandan Tamrakar wrote: >>> >>> I think you need to specify the port as well for following port >>> >>> >>> fs.default.name >>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Tejas Lagvankar wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> We are trying to set up a cluster (starting with 2 machines) using the >>> new >>> 0.20.1 version. >>> >>> On the master machine, just after the server starts, the name node dies >>> off >>> with the following exception: >>> >>> 2009-10-13 01:22:24,740 ERROR >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: >>> Incomplete HDFS URI, no host: hdfs://master_hadoop >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.initialize(DistributedFileSystem.java:78) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1373) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$200(FileSystem.java:66) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1385) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:191) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:95) >>> at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.(Trash.java:62) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.startTrashEmptier(NameNode.java:208) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:204) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:956) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) >>> >>> Can anyone help ? Also can anyone send across example configuration >>> files >>> for 0.20.1 if they are different than we are using ? >>> >>> The detail log file is attached along with. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The configuration files are as follows: >>> >>> MASTER CONFIG >>> ------ conf/masters ------- >>> master_hadoop >>> >>> ------ conf/slaves ------- >>> master_hadoop >>> slave_hadoop >>> >>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>> >>> >>> >>> fs.default.name >>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>> >>> >>> >>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp >>> >>> >>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>> >>> dfs.replication >>> 2 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>> >>> mapred.job.tracker >>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> SLAVE CONFIG >>> ------ core-site.xml ------- >>> >>> hadoop.tmp.dir >>> /opt/hadoop-0.20.1/tmp/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> fs.default.name >>> hdfs://master_hadoop >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ hdfs-site.xml ------- >>> >>> dfs.replication >>> 2 >>> >>> >>> ------ mapred-site.xml ------- >>> >>> mapred.job.tracker >>> tejas_hadoop:9001 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tejas Lagvankar >>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 < >>> http://www.umbc.edu/%7Etej2> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Chandan Tamrakar >>> >>> Tejas Lagvankar >>> meettejas@umbc.edu >>> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Tejas Lagvankar >> meettejas@umbc.edu >> www.umbc.edu/~tej2 >> >> >> >> > Tejas Lagvankar > meettejas@umbc.edu > www.umbc.edu/~tej2 > > > > --0016e64714a4ce239f0475d4ae67-- From general-return-637-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 17:37:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98491 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 17:37:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 55834 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55765 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13035 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 17:32:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AD6068E.5030902@apache.org> References: <4AD6068E.5030902@apache.org> From: Matt Massie Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:31:25 -0700 Message-ID: <35538fbe0910141031h6b6d6fd3ycaa5e789da67659f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: new Avro Committer: Thiruvalluvan M. G. To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502b0ec69d73c0475e889c7 --00504502b0ec69d73c0475e889c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congratulations, Thiru! -Matt On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > The Hadoop PMC has voted to make Thiruvalluvan M. G. an Avro committer. > > Congratulations, Thiru! > > Doug > --00504502b0ec69d73c0475e889c7-- From general-return-638-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 17:57:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6710 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 6707 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6659 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6647 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:57:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:57:04 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9GHufnt022246 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=Sl0w/q29rrbAwqow1etAiuaZ4bSOdzcX3UFCcaF7PMOLa3l9roVSbx2qunu5VolY Message-Id: <01BE13FF-2ED2-45FD-9AE8-C45998B91077@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7AEF9819-E5D3-40EA-96BE-7724EC942C45@yahoo-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop and org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration class. Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:56:40 -0700 References: <6eeff0ad0910160626u33505253xfb3a91c13267cc9@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100910160910j68f2c485nbdda1ff8ebdce05d@mail.gmail.com> <6eeff0ad0910160920y39ca3ea8k6e2e97f58e2e9ba3@mail.gmail.com> <7AEF9819-E5D3-40EA-96BE-7724EC942C45@yahoo-inc.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 Arun On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Oct 16, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > >> Yes I meant final. >> But why when I am using Configuration.writeXML(out) there is no >> >> parameters in saved file? > > This was a conscious decision we made in HADOOP-785. > > The idea is that a Configuration is serialized from the 'client > context'. The client configuration is always loaded on 'top' of the > configuration stack at runtime on the server (either at the > JobTracker on job-submission or at the TaskTracker during task- > execution) and thus the notion of 'final' parameters is moot. > > Having said that you do have a valid cause for complaint; I've > recently been involved in some discussions with the Pig team where > we concluded that this feature could be useful during task > localization on the TaskTracker i.e. the TaskTracker should set the > 'localized' parameters of the task to be 'final'. The short end of > the stick is I'd request you to open a jira asking for this > enhancement... please? > > thanks, > Arun > From general-return-639-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 16 20:19:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66860 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 20:19:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 20:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 37815 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 20:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37737 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 20:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37725 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 20:19:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:19:16 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so2130551gxk.9 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ldy5Ukhs6VlQz5NzDpZNX8YvTdPjLkBnd72vua//4rc=; b=axdXWacO6jCAWbklfZs4dnpgjrZumHKTRTxUNoxIOZlnfHltspkOOS7ecIhlYY8cMh 91uYVE2u7EGLs+7Bcbb1ExIt5TDph37TPTYNKR/0s2kXzqx4Y7i/fzCdslpPkGq9jU25 W07kl68+BEOirc8xRBijEASUrYSyrmT3fWpIM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VOx07ZxVgm2Fi2WLl+nQgxmNWm39VwYYLdBev6dY39oXdjJMBrlJWCSLkC0gRpOzd6 vDm+Kkwseh9eCHNiDsMDV5TSyk/2Hft5sXNMq1u3uQeOPYziSc8fiij475HrzUAXbkIb 0zwUoDd6JUas17pkRKY+Hk9muJvLr6EsWBqjw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.113.19 with SMTP id l19mr3529503ybc.239.1255724335603; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:18:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15da8a100910161014vdd50480ub20e7f7ba14d9b19@mail.gmail.com> References: <78568af10910151613k4742fe1dpb0a9028ac6229c2c@mail.gmail.com> <15da8a100910161014vdd50480ub20e7f7ba14d9b19@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:18:55 -0700 Message-ID: <78568af10910161318k35a17170v91776a8e06c822dd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 3 projects - how to reconcile the duplicated files? From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the reply, I'm currently using git://github.com/toddlipcon/hadoop-meta.git to help me build things... it's tricky because there are 3 projects and you seem to have to manually carry the dependent jars around between projects. There is still the problem that the docs target wont build on OSX 10.6.1, but I'm sure you guys know about that one. -ryan On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Philip Zeyliger wrote: >> AFAIK the only issue with the 'ant docs' target (which 'ant target' relies >> on) is that you need java1.5 - if you can confirm this isn't the case would >> you mind opening a jira? > > The magic you want is to add something like the following to your ant > command line. > > -Dforrest.home=~/pub/apache-forrest-0.8/bin/forrest > -Dfindbugs.home=$HOME/pub/findbugs-1.3.8 > -Djava5.home=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.5/Home > > and obviously you need to download findbugs and forrest themselves. > (Avro manages to download them via ivy; that might be a sensible > improvement.) > > -- Philip > From general-return-640-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 19 11:14:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14635 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2009 11:14:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2009 11:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23289 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 11:14:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23201 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 11:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23191 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2009 11:14:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:14:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of luis.junges@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:14:45 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so3743731ywh.5 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/VEoxe6YU16+w8vxJQUAdvC7lSku4N+WBeyGwRExq68=; b=YgfZ4hD4v/cnY31Dq/6xlEQrTWkhtYxbaEv4KAPo/dOUk5SB8Rwo2I7+4c0kddKsp4 8dmioJKZJ6r02g8SRif+huFqhM+QSjaQMicpNLeDUmn1xEx+o+42Sc13XmOlb41WpjLT SoQzy/tRLXSmbF4tiKw9Oif+o33RDvszfAxxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VkYQhXNAvo1yVQaMcGATviusjVSrcqAu7vDlaLTV40KAlcf+E9nhI9nDfDUOFSZZyU DKai/WFoC+gMYboayHzrZqsJw+dB6LhKqG2x5L6Ay7GXL11Me5hAJ9n7oe0/HLcl9qFR O/ax1nRzsq+qsZXCuQWql8klghiaVV4UGki4E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.57.14 with SMTP id j14mr3086101ank.105.1255950864621; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:14:24 -0200 Message-ID: <752a037e0910190414j5f36de24g48e8f92019504a53@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Store Large files/images HBase From: Luis Carlos Junges To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34f702420c5047647d9ae --001636d34f702420c5047647d9ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am currently doing some research on distributed database that can be scaled easily in terms of storage capacity. The reason is to use it on the brazilian federal project called "portal do aluno" wich will have around 10 million kids accessing it monthly. The idea is to build a portal similar to facebook/orkut with the main objective to spread knowledge amoung kids (6 -13 years old). well, now the problem: Those kids will generate a lot of data which include photos, videos, presentations, school tasks among others. In order to have a 100% available system and also to scale this amount of data (initial estimative is 10 TB at the full use of the portal), a distributed storage engine seems to be the solution. On the avialable solutions, i liked voldemort because it seems not to have = a SPOF (single point of failure) when compared to HBase. However HBase seems to integrate with more tools and sub-projects. my question is concerned to the fact of storing such big items (2 MB photo for example) with HBase. I read on on blogs that HBase has a high latency which leads it to be inappropriate to serve dynamic pages. Will the performance of HBase decrease even more if large binary objects are stored on it? Other question i have is related to the fact of modelling the data using key/value pattern. With relational database it is just follow cake recipe and it=B4s done. Do we have such recipe for key/value? Currently a lot of code was done with relational database postgreSQL using hibernate to mapping the objects. i will appreciate any comments --=20 "A realidade de cada lugar e de cada =E9poca =E9 uma alucina=E7=E3o coletiv= a." Bloom, Howard --001636d34f702420c5047647d9ae-- From general-return-641-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 19 14:34:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74190 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2009 14:34:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2009 14:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 38710 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 14:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38601 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 14:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38554 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2009 14:34:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.49] (HELO smtp3.4emm.com) (69.18.222.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:34:15 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB03.4emm.local ([192.168.161.134]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:32:50 -0400 From: Doug Meil To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:34:03 -0400 Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce Thread-Topic: Question about MapReduce Thread-Index: AcpNxZGJRYqvqRyNRc+UbNEJB+LiywDAxldA Message-ID: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5950196E34A15@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi there- I didn't see the option in the thread yet which seems pretty straightforwar= d: When setting up the job: Job job =3D new Job(conf, "my job"); ... =20 conf.setStrings("param", "param1"); And then in the map method: String paramVal =3D context.getConfiguration().get("param"); This is using Hadoop .20 syntax, the previous verison had a 'configure' met= hod you had to implement. -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:31 PM To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce 1) I don't think TableInputFormat is useful in this case. Looks like it's = used for scanning columns from a single HTable. 2) TableMapReduceUtil - same problem. Seems like this works with just one = table. 3) JV recommended NLineInputFormat, but my parameters are not in a file. T= hey come from multiple files and are in memory. I guess what I am looking for is something like... InMemoryInputFormat... s= imilar to FileInputFormat & DbInputFormat. There's no such class right now= . Worse comes to worst, I can write the parameters into a flat file, and use = FileInputFormat - but that will slow down this process considerably. Is th= ere no other way? ________________________________ From: Mark Vigeant To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 7:21:40 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce There is a tableInputFormat class in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.Tabl= eInputFormat Also, if you want to use TableMapReduceUtil you probably want to have your = mapper function extend TableMapper. Check out the javadocs for more info: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/c= urrent/api/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:37 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce If the answer is... TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob I apologize for the spam. If this isn't the right way, please let me know.= Thanks. --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an inpu= t file or from a database. I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mapper = & Reducer to work on. Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 differe= nt tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat becaus= e everything I need is already on HBase.=20 How can I do this? Please let me know. Thanks. =20 From general-return-642-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 19 15:23:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97374 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2009 15:23:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2009 15:23:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 48366 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 15:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48294 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 15:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48284 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2009 15:23:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:23:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.195.15.168] (HELO web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (67.195.15.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:23:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 66653 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Oct 2009 15:23:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1255965809; bh=c0EIVqG5V1jforZsnaYI2tASi401jREGjH6zYFcPK9I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=myzqWxy0Mz+o7xFQv0PUPzbuCROjutnxtsyKVs6J+hunXOIPGMPPq8VfKA4L9WlpHddkxLIUW3qXx0Db2w6VbbplFfKjc/wqE/kEAB7oi7URzSpcCGsWrqIznBs11Rr3HbHRgozxoghGld9hHkzqTFwVTmrzE4/Te1kgSOrdZhg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3sHBXuNEthTUQnqCjJg5Mda7VhzFWXoRJfb8T3wY5/pQckVspieii+n9VdvAYTAOdPr4A1iwSmbBtWXBrgmisj/lhdTDMPkXb2OSsw7uhWPladVohA+76/uyFY9ITHlKNmPYAn0M9jUX6u0RpL1QkzpZrgxnKCPYqkkPSiMpaNw=; Message-ID: <797590.66623.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: kCv3R.EVM1m_bBwDvhY7hJFZJZ63BCl2a_miwLF4QF3syGNE2QdTkXmNx8H1yjmEhGyi6ICO15VVPVwtFVTVlVmaGGtIMl4swiQf2GSjVWykGANbzG1Cx6UkmPtUzUJPgLwYmkk9ezITohgkny0ldhoLz0FUjM6tHK3yIEIB2JZiRongTkyhV12z8KtVs.qay2IVyz_PNdbdbrEJjwO8AfPxFLB6ywjwDIY8CTYTCa9pRnVrWQdZfyvYHKYFwzwLaoV.7Z0FaR3ZeAKIhOY.JVV_CJLyxVNZ5aZ8HBx0igPoEn1YQNEm0323uQj1_6ZEGp2DaKMB4iD9UyaJc3Cx7gUIDFnnjzwB5DNIEhLkTSYleh66gs5Dq3xRc46qWuM- Received: from [67.218.106.224] by web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:23:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/182.10 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3 References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5950196E34A15@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:23:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Something Something Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5950196E34A15@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1467626233-1255965809=:66623" --0-1467626233-1255965809=:66623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Interesting... I haven't tried this yet.. but in this case what would you specify as the 'InputPath'? I was under the assumption that a Job needs some kind of InputPath.. no? I don't see a NullInputPath. Is there something equivalent? ________________________________ From: Doug Meil To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" ; "general@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Mon, October 19, 2009 7:34:03 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce Hi there- I didn't see the option in the thread yet which seems pretty straightforward: When setting up the job: Job job = new Job(conf, "my job"); ... conf.setStrings("param", "param1"); And then in the map method: String paramVal = context.getConfiguration().get("param"); This is using Hadoop .20 syntax, the previous verison had a 'configure' method you had to implement. -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:31 PM To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce 1) I don't think TableInputFormat is useful in this case. Looks like it's used for scanning columns from a single HTable. 2) TableMapReduceUtil - same problem. Seems like this works with just one table. 3) JV recommended NLineInputFormat, but my parameters are not in a file. They come from multiple files and are in memory. I guess what I am looking for is something like... InMemoryInputFormat... similar to FileInputFormat & DbInputFormat. There's no such class right now. Worse comes to worst, I can write the parameters into a flat file, and use FileInputFormat - but that will slow down this process considerably. Is there no other way? ________________________________ From: Mark Vigeant To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 7:21:40 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce There is a tableInputFormat class in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TableInputFormat Also, if you want to use TableMapReduceUtil you probably want to have your mapper function extend TableMapper. Check out the javadocs for more info: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:37 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce If the answer is... TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob I apologize for the spam. If this isn't the right way, please let me know. Thanks. --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an input file or from a database. I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mapper & Reducer to work on. Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 different tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat because everything I need is already on HBase. How can I do this? Please let me know. Thanks. --0-1467626233-1255965809=:66623-- From general-return-643-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 19 16:52:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32427 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2009 16:52:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2009 16:52:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89951 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 16:51:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89841 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 16:51:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89822 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2009 16:51:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:51:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.18.222.49] (HELO smtp3.4emm.com) (69.18.222.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:51:56 +0000 Received: from EX2K7VS03.4emm.local ([192.168.160.203]) by HUB03.4emm.local ([192.168.161.134]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:50:31 -0400 From: Doug Meil To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:51:46 -0400 Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce Thread-Topic: Question about MapReduce Thread-Index: AcpQ0AdV0WWuSZx4SUOjxlRvRkko8AAC8n3Q Message-ID: <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5950196E34A95@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> References: <967240.52565.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <805542.37510.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5D66A842901F8E41815AF6D27A28EC490A7D6E07EF@Mail-Ab02.rmg-ny.com> <297355.50875.qm@web111413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <67680900F79B1D4F99C844EE386FC5950196E34A15@EX2K7VS03.4emm.local> <797590.66623.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <797590.66623.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 The job still needs everything else (input path, output path, mapper-class,= etc.). This is trying to address the parameter-passing question of how pa= rameters can be passed to mappers/reducers. Correction: there is a bug in my example... Since I'm reading the paramet= er with a 'get() ' I should have called 'set' instead of 'setStrings'. But= that's the general idea. -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 11:23 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce Interesting... I haven't tried this yet.. but in this case what would you s= pecify as the 'InputPath'? I was under the assumption that a Job needs som= e kind of InputPath.. no? I don't see a NullInputPath. Is there something= equivalent? ________________________________ From: Doug Meil To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" ; "general= @hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Mon, October 19, 2009 7:34:03 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce Hi there- I didn't see the option in the thread yet which seems pretty straightforwar= d: When setting up the job: Job job =3D new Job(conf, "my job"); ... =20 conf.setStrings("param", "param1"); And then in the map method: String paramVal =3D context.getConfiguration().get("param"); This is using Hadoop .20 syntax, the previous verison had a 'configure' met= hod you had to implement. -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:31 PM To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce 1) I don't think TableInputFormat is useful in this case. Looks like it's = used for scanning columns from a single HTable. 2) TableMapReduceUtil - same problem. Seems like this works with just one = table. 3) JV recommended NLineInputFormat, but my parameters are not in a file. T= hey come from multiple files and are in memory. I guess what I am looking for is something like... InMemoryInputFormat... s= imilar to FileInputFormat & DbInputFormat. There's no such class right now= . Worse comes to worst, I can write the parameters into a flat file, and use = FileInputFormat - but that will slow down this process considerably. Is th= ere no other way? ________________________________ From: Mark Vigeant To: "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Thu, October 15, 2009 7:21:40 AM Subject: RE: Question about MapReduce There is a tableInputFormat class in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.Tabl= eInputFormat Also, if you want to use TableMapReduceUtil you probably want to have your = mapper function extend TableMapper. Check out the javadocs for more info: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/c= urrent/api/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Something Something [mailto:luckyguy2050@yahoo.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:37 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Question about MapReduce If the answer is... TableMapReduceUtil.initTableMapperJob I apologize for the spam. If this isn't the right way, please let me know.= Thanks. --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Something Something wrote: From: Something Something Subject: Question about MapReduce To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:18 PM I would like to start a Map-Reduce job that does not read data from an inpu= t file or from a database. I would like to pass 3 arguments to the Mapper = & Reducer to work on. Basically, these arguments are keys on the 3 differe= nt tables on HBase. In other words, I don't want to use FileInputFormat or DbInputFormat becaus= e everything I need is already on HBase.=20 How can I do this? Please let me know. Thanks. =20 From general-return-644-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 20 02:38:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59747 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2009 02:38:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2009 02:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6916 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 02:38:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6831 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 02:38:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6817 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2009 02:38:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:38:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.188] (HELO mail-iw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.223.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:37:54 +0000 Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so2827910iwn.5 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=F2mQe0j5Kqxr8sVFq1/6hhavnp367if2ZU5+OK/5kTw=; b=IotUgrFNNzDoX0Y/egPwYl7zMjuMcfZNx9MJGPrUS8qAJhotYG0+n4h2ncEb8D7Ajs OSjn3rLMq4cH/xXFiUfkneOtJguvqNKn9EUWP7pO11x2CBFLF7ccMguMSpB8vP9YpSna EhCF8/vYIEwVQGZMKtcD5LjxWAavv4NuGjmZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YqvQyVH+0X/adprZHC+geIklQiDOIaLNW9fRH7SYilioBo4U4kj/c748+XMLe61kGD lYat3meVdo9mXSV8YnWk52ZBPJXoVMJgHrvxXD90Oz/qdgrbcTMrvAaEsPeE0tpO1J8k LnDkeTZVvZrNL0oCHeGbM3jO+zb/xrmdl84/g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.29 with SMTP id x29mr3683957ibb.31.1256006253138; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:37:33 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773e7308dd307047654be18 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151773e7308dd307047654be18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi I get the following error on executing a map-reduce application on EC2. Can any one please pass suggest some pointers what is going wrong? I tried searching the mailing list, but couldnt find any help regarding this type of error. *[root@ip-10-243-47-69 hadoop-0.19.0]# bin/hadoop jar lubm.jar bike.lubm.SubPredObj In* *09/10/19 22:26:41 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=JobTracker, sessionId=* *09/10/19 22:26:41 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same.* *09/10/19 22:26:42 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1* *09/10/19 22:26:42 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0001* *09/10/19 22:26:42 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 1* *09/10/19 22:26:43 INFO mapred.MapTask: numReduceTasks: 1* *09/10/19 22:26:43 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100* *09/10/19 22:26:43 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720* *09/10/19 22:26:43 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680* *09/10/19 22:26:43 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0%* *09/10/19 22:26:44 WARN impl.RDFDefaultErrorHandler: unknown-source: {W136} Relative URIs are not permitted in RDF: specifically * *09/10/19 22:26:44 ERROR impl.RDFDefaultErrorHandler: file:///usr/local/hadoop-0.19.0/RDF/XML(line 9 column 28): {E215} Resolving against relative URI : <>* *09/10/19 22:26:44 WARN impl.RDFDefaultErrorHandler: file:///usr/local/hadoop-0.19.0/RDF/XML(line 9 column 28): {W136} Relative URIs are not permitted in RDF: specifically * *09/10/19 22:26:49 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output* *09/10/19 22:26:49 WARN mapred.LocalJobRunner: job_local_0001* *org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid local directory for taskTracker/jobcache/job_local_0001/attempt_local_0001_m_000000_0/output/spill0.out * * at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator$AllocatorPerContext.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:335) * * at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:124) * * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapOutputFile.getSpillFileForWrite(MapOutputFile.java:107) * * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.sortAndSpill(MapTask.java:920) * * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.flush(MapTask.java:832)* * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:333)* * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:138)* *java.io.IOException: Job failed!* * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1217)* * at bike.lubm.SubPredObj.getSPOFile(SubPredObj.java:63)* * at bike.lubm.SubPredObj.main(SubPredObj.java:12)* * at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)* * at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) * * at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) * * at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)* * at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:165)* * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54)* * at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65)* * at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79)* * at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68)* Thanks H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --00151773e7308dd307047654be18-- From general-return-645-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 20 12:49:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17299 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2009 12:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2009 12:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 76332 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 12:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76278 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 12:49:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76141 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2009 12:49:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:49:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.2.179] (HELO exprod7og113.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:49:16 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.223.199]) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSt2xtTL5BtSaOnLyfJoCpJPn3t3wyjfD@postini.com; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:48:55 PDT Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2726073iwn.16 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:48:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.121.93 with SMTP id g29mr14711053ibr.13.1256042933545; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:48:53 +0300 Message-ID: <6eeff0ad0910200548q245deeebq2a8afebcf18807c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Lunching webapps with hadoop From: Vitaliy Avdeev To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646926ae06b1504765d4848 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646926ae06b1504765d4848 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello. I need to lunch my web aplication with hadoop. It is writed with jsp. What i need to do to lunch it witch hadoop? --0016e646926ae06b1504765d4848-- From general-return-646-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 20 15:06:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85760 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2009 15:06:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2009 15:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 62857 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 15:06:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62798 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2009 15:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62343 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2009 15:05:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:05:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bogdan.maryniuk@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:05:56 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2214536ewy.36 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:05:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Okv/xg0iHU4cwleonZbxNj53hizXHsjaQKEtI21tY9o=; b=GOySWvYCM5BgNuzTsN00UilVdV7iooDTTGkR03uV1DclkWproJZbcBf/9kotMvMLuK 4Yj/O5VlGT2+AlQpJiWzAZ21jgzUuXsQamqJlJmuN7y3jzxP+2N0B89R/gxiHdOtJyGi 1m49tlsiz47MwpuKn1nBp7El7G+xGQOi4mWJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XkyyAuXBB6zQ3UCm/HQX8dBw73BXuxqg7eqrW9cj1KzvbJQn6VRIpFLpumgbYMRUJR +hHFOKbfxGiaKGLWPMNs70Q+A3LzeH5YybdzsmaHNl4GrW3UPAoYAu3VBn0A1TUnSPJH cUTeqn9RqyBM13sEX+jHFKelqiM4dLBgEKeco= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.157.7 with SMTP id j7mr7533818ebo.2.1256051135363; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:05:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6eeff0ad0910200548q245deeebq2a8afebcf18807c@mail.gmail.com> References: <6eeff0ad0910200548q245deeebq2a8afebcf18807c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:05:35 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lunching webapps with hadoop From: "Bogdan M. Maryniuk" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Vitaliy Avdeev wrote: > I need to lunch my web aplication with hadoop. Probably "launch" instead, since you're not gonna eat it... :-) Anyway, what do you mean when saying "launch web application with hadoop"? What is the design and what you're gonna do? > What i need to do to lunch it witch hadoop? Well... first step is probably install Hadoop itself =E2=80=94 that's for sure!... :-) The next step is probably to explain us your app design and what you want to achieve. --=20 Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. From general-return-647-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 21 17:51:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38142 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2009 17:51:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2009 17:51:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 48686 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2009 16:15:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48572 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2009 16:15:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48485 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2009 16:15:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:15:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:15:25 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so6189054yxe.5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BF8q0oxqECiM3ZbXOxcjSW33gTVQbnj3AVb/pOsmQnU=; b=XmYt1Pg9NRilJYbTZY655xjEEWxQZuVmkEsiYC3zxmAPVU+JQH+5XIUvF60bplaNXz xOPpHuobychrBS7uzR/asYgLOj3B5K9ER8rsXOefA1dGS9uetbT7sN5GXW3B+gc2hXoR VFtzUTLh3LNeOrqIXA4dZvrR0IV9t5zvTWLuk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ACEPGeWRD5X9fPh4G3icluvpu5Vv6sHSoA/cC2VPucmmwF11KZqts35z5Vl4hiBw8O h5L8WKdSFS7Ak2yYTtoZBL6CAI8briVqVTYgh7WSQN32W66bY+hSD1iXaueQq6X8bxOI j8+I5PptBa7qceVkeZJhMj7vceWnvn0YxyXTo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.208.26 with SMTP id k26mr5064849anq.6.1256141703934; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:15:03 -0500 Message-ID: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Namenode with External Storage? From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d3cf2f0cf40b0476744858 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d3cf2f0cf40b0476744858 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to find anything that seems to cover this. It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to function efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using external storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a different class of hardware for our namenodes with attached storage and little or no internal storage. Some of the benefits this would provide us are: 1) allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're familiar with and already have considerable experience keeping up in a production environment. 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk. We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something we're not considering. Thanks. Jonathan --0016e6d3cf2f0cf40b0476744858-- From general-return-648-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 21 18:28:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59366 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2009 18:28:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2009 18:28:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 96479 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2009 18:27:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95714 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2009 18:27:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95403 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2009 18:27:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:27:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:22:24 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so6322260ywh.5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UqpKzbI7ZhgewU/C2MGkCefDqxAlLMOmD660ePuwn4o=; b=QRa06Qr1YIk0nYyRqWmfCQiGdyouI2pwwIXldjNJkP+CE/gzZwR6X/KwABugXF/S+P mj9rda7ROmXVNcdLrkOBLUe+3G83U3t+fmUD/XsBFEMiOhI9mPpmmp1oUjtQn/dPAmnM uM6Q2EbaOY5ztAIOWKC5GDTtYQJ4cCAymUxgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=c+i2Xum3RFHBKMkLYEdSiOa5dTu00fbSnUk7hVTo6JEzoqHMZDVt12WjEUmR8U4WPu S9+I7hSrClmzteUjOypl0bRaHknBszMWyluweqQIZp2EsQzDPY0CPuWT+JcAKAql0EgR y6C4u1mSF/EWougVw+bocFSRedyLq+ZfbD2ak= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.237.9 with SMTP id k9mr13743758ybh.108.1256149323739; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:22:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70910211122k389f5c6al26e860054b2a45f4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Namenode with External Storage? From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd23b2039f2060476760e8b --000e0cd23b2039f2060476760e8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The namenode uses storage to write file system transaction logs as well as to write server-debug-log-messages. Both of these could be stored in a NFS mounted file system, should work well. thanks, dhruba On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Seidman < jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to find > anything that seems to cover this. > > It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to function > efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using external > storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a different > class of hardware for our namenodes with attached storage and little or no > internal storage. Some of the benefits this would provide us are: 1) > allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're familiar with and > already have considerable experience keeping up in a production > environment. > 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk. > > We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant > degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something we're not > considering. > > Thanks. > > Jonathan > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd23b2039f2060476760e8b-- From general-return-649-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 02:59:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28776 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 02:59:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 02:59:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 34451 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 02:59:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34358 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 02:59:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34348 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 02:59:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.200.80.34] (HELO smtp1.es.uci.edu) (128.200.80.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:59:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ip72-211-211-194.oc.oc.cox.net [72.211.211.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9M2wkc0027159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:58:47 -0700 X-UCInetID: vayyalas Message-ID: <4ADFCA54.9000400@uci.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:58:28 -0700 From: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Eclipse plugin for Hadoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070305070904080608030100" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------070305070904080608030100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi All, I was configuring eclipse o run map- reduce jobs. I am following the tutorial on http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module3.html#plugin-conf . I am not able to find the plug in mentioned in the site. I downloaded one from http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/tools/hadoopvm/index.html. But when I try to configure the hadoop server, I am getting an error message saying: "No hadoop found in this location". I think I am giving an incorrect location for installation directory. What should be the correct value ? If anyone has used the tutorial provided by Yahoo! , please help me out with this problem. Thanks in advance. Vandana --------------070305070904080608030100-- From general-return-650-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 03:16:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31911 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 03:16:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 03:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 40640 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 03:16:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40557 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 03:16:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40547 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 03:16:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:16:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.188] (HELO mail-iw0-f188.google.com) (209.85.223.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:16:32 +0000 Received: by iwn26 with SMTP id 26so4228407iwn.5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/D7sagvqVX1Xdv3syag0XM+1AxZRwnOPBjEC/umFMls=; b=ZWDz5hHeUUPb1TTWPbfi9hGzni9A3RZV+eKzTxSIiJafeTIsNCSmAzxkC45PWFPoHz WvYf8OmOE1gV4lnTF8gINzDzGIlF2E0jzJY6kED/O+dMhy+9PDMBCJcZduuLyxCOTOq2 MIhL1eV+8jdBF8eZAzhIdYWd7aT3FbANmrR4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=UsDhwNcnSC1hAnWn5DU6nEV8OuAsR7tQJPjzFV54H7rYl4WMxOodIBDdghZDlu4cSg PdWfq88Q/2OCn9Fvcubp2AsJ5uRG7sQqYlVVbd7GwDyNOPOVWWw5Ug35U11LzpFGwhd6 uR7f1JMq4reIMCALP627AJ8k+vx4Tczrijrsc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.123.41 with SMTP id n41mr5414170ibr.46.1256181371634; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:16:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ADFCA54.9000400@uci.edu> References: <4ADFCA54.9000400@uci.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:16:11 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Eclipse plugin for Hadoop From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e647195a6e080d04767d8416 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e647195a6e080d04767d8416 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dont know why do u need to download the plug-in from some site. The plug-in is included in the downloaded hadoop tar file. You can find plugin jar file inside /your-directory-structure/hadoop-version/contrib/eclipse-plugin/ - H. Kumar 2009/10/22 Vandana Ayyalasomayajula > Hi All, > > I was configuring eclipse o run map- reduce jobs. I am following the > tutorial on > http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module3.html#plugin-conf . I am > not able to find the plug in mentioned in the site. I downloaded one from > http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/tools/hadoopvm/index.html. < > http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/tools/hadoopvm/index.html> But when I > try to configure the hadoop server, I am getting an error message saying: > "No hadoop found in this location". I think I am giving an incorrect > location for installation directory. What should be the correct value ? > > If anyone has used the tutorial provided by Yahoo! , please help me out > with this problem. > Thanks in advance. > Vandana > --0016e647195a6e080d04767d8416-- From general-return-651-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 04:53:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60524 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 04:53:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 04:53:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 13418 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 04:53:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13343 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 04:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13333 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 04:53:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:53:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.200.80.28] (HELO smtp2.es.uci.edu) (128.200.80.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:53:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ip72-211-211-194.oc.oc.cox.net [72.211.211.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9M4qw6I002950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:52:59 -0700 X-UCInetID: vayyalas Message-ID: <4ADFE517.9000703@uci.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:52:39 -0700 From: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Eclipse plugin for Hadoop References: <4ADFCA54.9000400@uci.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the information. I just overlooked the contents of the folder. Vandana Harshit Kumar wrote: > Dont know why do u need to download the plug-in from some site. The plug-in > is included in the downloaded hadoop tar file. You can find plugin jar file > inside /your-directory-structure/hadoop-version/contrib/eclipse-plugin/ - > > > H. Kumar > > > 2009/10/22 Vandana Ayyalasomayajula > > >> Hi All, >> >> I was configuring eclipse o run map- reduce jobs. I am following the >> tutorial on >> http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module3.html#plugin-conf . I am >> not able to find the plug in mentioned in the site. I downloaded one from >> http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/tools/hadoopvm/index.html. < >> http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/tools/hadoopvm/index.html> But when I >> try to configure the hadoop server, I am getting an error message saying: >> "No hadoop found in this location". I think I am giving an incorrect >> location for installation directory. What should be the correct value ? >> >> If anyone has used the tutorial provided by Yahoo! , please help me out >> with this problem. >> Thanks in advance. >> Vandana >> >> > > From general-return-652-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 16:37:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82846 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 16:37:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 16:37:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 5434 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 16:37:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5353 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 16:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5343 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 16:37:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:37:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:37:47 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n9MGbMw8009756 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:37:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from prayer@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id n9MGbMW2009755 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:37:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: prayer set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f From: gmackey@cs.ucf.edu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Namenode with External Storage? Date: 22 Oct 2009 12:37:21 -0400 X-Mailer: Prayer v1.0.16 X-Originating-IP: [10.173.214.212] In-Reply-To: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 As with Dhruba's comment, so long as it is just the namenode that is running on a networked file system everything should be chill. The namenode keeps all of its working metadata in main mem, and it only occasionally pushes a log file out to hard storage (and if I remember correctly you can adjust this time window in one of the site files). However, you are going to run into huge performance issues running datanodes over a networked storage system. Having to push that many file requests over a network for a respectable mapreduce job is going to kill your equipment. - Grant On Oct 21 2009, Jonathan Seidman wrote: >Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to find >anything that seems to cover this. > > It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to function > efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using external > storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a > different class of hardware for our namenodes with attached storage and > little or no internal storage. Some of the benefits this would provide us > are: 1) allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're familiar > with and already have considerable experience keeping up in a production > environment. 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk. > >We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant >degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something we're not >considering. > >Thanks. > >Jonathan > -- -- Grant Mackey PhD student Computer Engineering University of Central Florida Rm 231 cube 5 (321) 960-8851 From general-return-653-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 17:01:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90044 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 17:01:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 17:01:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 37249 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 17:01:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37164 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 17:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37154 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 17:01:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:01:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:01:26 +0000 Received: from oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com (oceanfarearth-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.113.156]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9MH0Bvq026028 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:mime-version: subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=o0oHSJipC3lmD0VUr1i/nkbl5UL5JPt/Xy6Sf3AKbYo9vsxpMw0EdIIvvOcelEhh Message-Id: <5480928D-30E6-4B28-AC23-A77F31EF3164@yahoo-inc.com> From: Sanjay Radia To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-898220983 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Namenode with External Storage? Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:00:11 -0700 References: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-4-898220983 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:37 AM, wrote: > As with Dhruba's comment, so long as it is just the namenode that is > running on a networked file system everything should be chill. The > namenode > keeps all of its working metadata in main mem, and it only > occasionally > pushes a log file out to hard storage (and if I remember correctly > you can > adjust this time window in one of the site files). > Actually it pushes out the update logs on each and every update synchronously. The checkpoint however is pushed out periodically. Also, at yahoo, we push out NN state to multiple disks and one of the "disks" is a nfs filer. This is configurable. sanjay > > However, you are going to run into huge performance issues running > datanodes over a networked storage system. Having to push that many > file > requests over a network for a respectable mapreduce job is going to > kill > your equipment. > > - Grant > > On Oct 21 2009, Jonathan Seidman wrote: > > >Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to > find > >anything that seems to cover this. > > > > It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to > function > > efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using > external > > storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a > > different class of hardware for our namenodes with attached > storage and > > little or no internal storage. Some of the benefits this would > provide us > > are: 1) allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're > familiar > > with and already have considerable experience keeping up in a > production > > environment. 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk. > > > >We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant > >degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something > we're not > >considering. > > > >Thanks. > > > >Jonathan > > > > -- > -- > Grant Mackey > PhD student Computer Engineering > University of Central Florida > Rm 231 cube 5 (321) 960-8851 > > --Apple-Mail-4-898220983-- From general-return-654-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 22 19:16:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48029 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2009 19:16:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2009 19:16:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 32501 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 19:16:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32410 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2009 19:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32399 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2009 19:16:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:16:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gmackey@cs.ucf.edu designates 132.170.108.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [132.170.108.1] (HELO longwood.cs.ucf.edu) (132.170.108.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:16:49 +0000 Received: from longwood.cs.ucf.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n9MJGRbF002710 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from apache@localhost) by longwood.cs.ucf.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id n9MJGO55002705 for general@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: longwood.cs.ucf.edu: apache set sender to gmackey@cs.ucf.edu using -f Received: from 10.173.214.212 ([10.173.214.212]) by mail.cs.ucf.edu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20091022151624.30264yzwbswk81wk@mail.cs.ucf.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:24 -0400 From: Grant Mackey To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Namenode with External Storage? References: <7ef0f1a90910210915p6e404c1eq7979c0a969a504a3@mail.gmail.com> <5480928D-30E6-4B28-AC23-A77F31EF3164@yahoo-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <5480928D-30E6-4B28-AC23-A77F31EF3164@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gondor.cs.ucf.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at longwood X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 oops, that is correct. My mistake Quoting Sanjay Radia : > > On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:37 AM, wrote: > >> As with Dhruba's comment, so long as it is just the namenode that is >> running on a networked file system everything should be chill. The namenode >> keeps all of its working metadata in main mem, and it only occasionally >> pushes a log file out to hard storage (and if I remember correctly you can >> adjust this time window in one of the site files). >> > > Actually it pushes out the update logs on each and every update > synchronously. > The checkpoint however is pushed out periodically. > > Also, at yahoo, we push out NN state to multiple disks and one of > the "disks" is a nfs filer. This is configurable. > > sanjay >> >> However, you are going to run into huge performance issues running >> datanodes over a networked storage system. Having to push that many file >> requests over a network for a respectable mapreduce job is going to kill >> your equipment. >> >> - Grant >> >> On Oct 21 2009, Jonathan Seidman wrote: >> >>> Apologies if this has been answered previously, but I'm unable to find >>> anything that seems to cover this. >>> >>> It's clear that datanodes require local storage for Hadoop to function >>> efficiently, but is there any significant disadvantage to using external >>> storage for namenodes? We're exploring the possibility of using a >>> different class of hardware for our namenodes with attached storage and >>> little or no internal storage. Some of the benefits this would provide us >>> are: 1) allowing our sysadmins to deploy hardware that they're familiar >>> with and already have considerable experience keeping up in a production >>> environment. 2) no namenode downtime to replace a failed disk. >>> >>> We don't anticipate that this approach would cause any significant >>> degradation to performance, but let me know if there's something we're not >>> considering. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >> >> -- >> -- >> Grant Mackey >> PhD student Computer Engineering >> University of Central Florida >> Rm 231 cube 5 (321) 960-8851 >> >> > > Grant Mackey UCF Research Assistant Engineering III Rm 238 Cubicle 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From general-return-655-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 23 19:52:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76534 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2009 19:52:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2009 19:52:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 83309 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2009 19:52:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83230 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2009 19:52:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83220 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2009 19:52:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.207.135] (HELO web32204.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.135) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:52:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 11558 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Oct 2009 19:52:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1256327539; bh=5y3IyiEjZ9xNVTi9YZfPjirH1PnlQDLDQa1mUqC57k8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dOuVp4AcrJxBWd0YDn2UdQpq4IS0GlFK/FrbBI6HP2ZBgCOaUPe/PhYbVru9OjlWVSLpPFQlytFQaOb08eP7MtDICOZS73C+GKBWfiWE2w8t6u6960elKthzVS7vW3pr6SVKJKeZF0fQuEaWG6nEX2quGTlhziujG+/bZyIjRxo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mHJQIIdxgAYacF43B5EQwumeE/oUqIc7nsicyW88akvnOghzk2qpJlMZ4yvusCUuwQJus3jpJOuNHzRNBLPMSYxvpLRG9dKCIDwc2/CYm+8YmST7qZmlH8np/zB3iJPRZzN9iY6n4EY40tjoZF87i7WScjia6JJ7tntQ/156WjY=; Message-ID: <318566.10596.qm@web32204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: fs_TluAVM1kYs8pDPmkmcOzAQQIiFEtsZK3dFqhgBZVmvGkcso1Ie0GKPRfLPUDmKrwRJ1UWYQl.a370nYUWg147KaaLTF3_DhI1m0LOIOO6KFp_UI8cJxLPgIMT7nyPOzDtdsTpZYu4iwJj3IouOVIG0LMs1CJV41pH6PYN1ZoqFQNQXdn5isjVA7dBBw_z9_qg68cXGqCgRhsBaPXIzyy1gzhtHF44QWOWeSX5SXm2phFqv63Nrc..mVxk6vcmKg0Ctnr.x0XWfsbm_Nj7yZQ.Mow2IPuX64Aj66y.fjF1i0LnVnrH61QVZpu1pWmY8Bce0N97YYZcELUS6Y5FvAspx7hy8TjUxJVZ8EN_EsurOHsuubMtIvdzcz1D8ayHLhrQfC3Oqx75.HihU3Uitw-- Received: from [208.7.132.130] by web32204.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:52:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.3 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Rajiv Maheshwari Subject: CombineFileInput Format vs. Large SequenceFile To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1902091781-1256327539=:10596" --0-1902091781-1256327539=:10596 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi everyone, I have a need to process a large number (millions) of relatively small XML files (I would imagine mostly 1K to 1 MB). I guess sending each file to a map-reduce task will cause too much overhead in setup and teardown of the tasks. So, I am considering 2 alternatives: 1) Generate 1 large SequenceFile with = for all the files. This SequenceFile would be huge. (I wonder is there any max record length / max size limit on HDFS file?) 2) Use CombineFileInputFormat I would appreciate any comments on performance considerations and other pros and cons. One more question: What if I have one large XML file composed of (a series of) each file's XML content, could it be possible to use StreamXMLReader while combining component files before sending to map-reduce task? Thanks, Rajiv --0-1902091781-1256327539=:10596-- From general-return-656-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 24 09:06:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32261 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2009 09:06:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2009 09:06:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 5262 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2009 09:06:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5175 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2009 09:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5165 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2009 09:06:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:06:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.228] (HELO mail-gx0-f228.google.com) (209.85.217.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:06:55 +0000 Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so8696342gxk.9 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x9KXdtd0d2VJVtG4tqkPmKWEENI63yHHL1O+gz/FAWk=; b=j0ixdIczdH18McXpV27iy3JR7b6IMhxQ+6ldMsrIwx+0HCp3giQ7+m9BObtX7PCDlJ 1eWHpR5gN0EEUKUaBSbKLleFXZgE23Kfrx6X7XRRfREUpaFiBnNUy507sY3YuaUPLJYf ck5s1kV8Te5CrAeHk9ZPlJgsoj23BHk3bRUz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=J+yLv13YFzM/Y74KsN+dP8uig5spCwfpJMZkkkZqarSeN9eL9LPn/9DiWEynmA3/dw alPgUumHoUGBchQHFZMkCpwRMXSfmLqk/wFsTgV7jhAAg3Fia0nsw9BN7cydSXZCoczV 7FLH7OCYOPj+vBuAPLTsHtPVm+aQ/fKPG2zeE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.86.11 with SMTP id o11mr10595493ybl.134.1256375194327; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <318566.10596.qm@web32204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <318566.10596.qm@web32204.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:06:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4aa34eb70910240206j5a1a46datc0f927b00c13d2ed@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CombineFileInput Format vs. Large SequenceFile From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd293f8299b790476aaa5a0 --000e0cd293f8299b790476aaa5a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 you could use both. if you query is to be done once, then either way is ok. If the query is to be done multiple times, it is better to create a large sequencefile as the first step and then continue to query that large file multiple times, otherwise you might land up transferring all the data across the network multiple times, one for every run of the query. thanks dhruba On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Rajiv Maheshwari wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a need to process a large number (millions) of relatively small XML > files (I would imagine mostly 1K to 1 MB). I guess sending each file to a > map-reduce task will cause too much overhead in setup and teardown of the > tasks. So, I am considering 2 alternatives: > > 1) Generate 1 large SequenceFile with = content> for all the files. This SequenceFile would be huge. (I wonder is > there any max record length / max size limit on HDFS file?) > > 2) Use CombineFileInputFormat > > I would appreciate any comments on performance considerations and other > pros and cons. > > One more question: What if I have one large XML file composed of (a series > of) each file's XML content, could it be possible to use StreamXMLReader > while combining component files before sending to map-reduce task? > > Thanks, > Rajiv > > > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd293f8299b790476aaa5a0-- From general-return-657-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 26 04:19:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 274 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2009 04:19:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2009 04:19:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 61263 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2009 04:19:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61110 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2009 04:19:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61100 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2009 04:19:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:19:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:19:37 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so6147843iwn.2 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=D6TxFbS+mJ5/qLUh0/+w3RyMKr30NniGnD9jRTxFCiI=; b=ANWnjYHFQJIr/sRDhMM62vQ6TL5QXywgGzAjbFUrJw0kP/Fz8fDBJkOg1P0IqlxBQ/ HR+n69Em1N/YHQeWsrMQCwdawZZFUF1JTHMVWbh1jDmorxnCBats0acSlcGn4nonpThA EzRL68zx+d/UulTj8rCtEh//mZPqueK0UfBb8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aPk68jLkL4ABf13BkV7EMQf5Z8ktIixPLgQfxyUD0DoKeW8ZuiICksKIOlevtiH/rf LhQGF+cdDE4TvMQ+kPFSSIsyKtKIpLPIPX9/08CNqK6EDS15EPJF8prBcSABrku22er5 zBpHa7zSjReRNix/PtHLUlN2+kDEv0ICqd1rA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.5.90 with SMTP id 26mr4979340ibu.42.1256530757171; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:19:17 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: S3 Exception From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015177409886e39aa0476cedd87 --0015177409886e39aa0476cedd87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi There is 1 GB of rdf/owl files that I am executing on EC2. Execution throws the following exception ------------------- 08/11/19 16:08:27 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3Exception: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAborted*A conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against **this** resource*. Please try again.324E696A4BCA8731{REMOVED} at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:74) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.initialize(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:63) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.$Proxy2.initialize(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.NativeS3FileSystem.initialize(NativeS3FileSystem.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.getFileSystem(Path.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:158) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:210) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJob(JobClient.java:742) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.submitAndMonitorJob(StreamJob.java:925) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.go(StreamJob.java:115) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.HadoopStreaming.main(HadoopStreaming.java:33) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) Caused by: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAbortedA conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against this resource. Please try again.{REMOVED}{REMOVED} at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRequest(RestS3Service.java:424) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRestPut(RestS3Service.java:734) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createObjectImpl(RestS3Service.java:1357) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createBucketImpl(RestS3Service.java:1234) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1390) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1158) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1177) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:69) ... 29 more --------------------- There were like 50 failed map tasks out of total of 1141 maps. Though hadoop job tracker successfully executed failed tasks again, but if a task fails, and then restarting it again, takes execution time. If somehow, this exception can be avoided altogether, program execution will be faster. Came across a JIRA post that says, the exception is because s3 tries to create a bucket which it should not create, and a patch is also posted for the same. Applied the patch, but still the same error. IMO, this error is because a operation is trying to access a part of file which is already been accessed by another map job. Please help resolve this issue or pass on any pointers that can suggest why is this error happening? Thanks and Regards H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --0015177409886e39aa0476cedd87-- From general-return-658-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 27 17:06:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83858 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2009 17:06:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2009 17:06:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 37675 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 17:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37552 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2009 17:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37534 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2009 17:06:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:06:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:06:24 +0000 Received: from SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas02.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.138]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n9RH4S1V003735; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:05:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=KGR5swrKFssuMxtnaoDRg4ZeZTZTUMAm5WhJLS4xaXcpx5xJ+8juGoSezXnsi9ox Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by SP1-EX07CAS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.167]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:05:20 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:05:18 -0700 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Nov 18th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - Nov 18th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQDSYUL9A= Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD5DE68ED@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, Thank you for those who attended the meeting last week, I hope you found it= interesting and helpful. Special thanks to all the presenters! Presentations are available here: http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2009/10/hadoop_user_group_hug_oct_2= 1st.html RSVP is now open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yah= oo! Sunnyvale Campus, planed for Nov 18th. Registration is available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/11724002/ We would like to include a session describing an application using Hadoop a= nd/or related technologies. If you are interested to present please send me= an email with a short description. Looking forward to seeing you and enjoy ApacheCon! Dekel From general-return-659-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 28 08:14:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25357 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 08:14:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 08:14:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 39598 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39510 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39496 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 08:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:14:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hadoopmaillist@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:14:39 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so540072ywh.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=AulgP5PsgWJyN1MG+tvDwYkunHhMjeks+PYE8tZ8zdQ=; b=cDk4PRos8oOuu9Sfed1YHIwsT5lXTb6KZfSMDjS+VIgrEYABvy12Fxw3+yH4bMOeE2 Li/PPIvEYvtFNygvX1+n+2/YXPCr4KGZlNSjR7z3cyuYPxG7PGIz3fqmZFXPxDCbOJQA guRjHf8+B9zCmrLwErJyZ+KkwnW6S6B4BSfqQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qAJnIMiyNa/k9hkFCHhhtjxqhEynBuOGW7nLyLGS5hF6yYGnpdiZeXAY2hutNYREm+ 0dYS1QQ6Wjd/npn7Mve2V8741J1aFRNjfsfEFOvx5YQLSqnSAFbrfov/jYOGyPvk9uuG KtPkVT2AFsVb8BD6T6+pjEyS5OmdpBgwQF6c4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.23.21 with SMTP id 21mr13787659agw.59.1256717658144; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:14:18 +0800 Message-ID: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: lei wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00148534bcba98c1af0476fa6123 --00148534bcba98c1af0476fa6123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, friends I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, So i did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring the records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which type should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some detail answer, thanks for you help. --00148534bcba98c1af0476fa6123-- From general-return-660-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 28 08:26:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28415 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 08:26:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 08:26:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 54265 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54186 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54176 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 08:26:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:26:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:26:30 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so723467pwi.29 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EBh6ycktuSXMJGnNzVMwcZ9Nr23qlp3PBOD0vYZeU1w=; b=o5Ny7MU4KHaEeISwhyZu6cHrVJV8aT/8s7A+nOHgWcMe85EN7gXjIuHzRfTKXQyXMH ynlH+pRvVeXZvWHcyWIA+RoLPVZZombvkLuvFaK1Fr8g+roI8hW+ganeJfmmhl1mJz9n GejPK4zJJK8u8MR97lbEqU+I/wsaUgcxP1QJ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kRFxHzJDRHFEc4B2oDqCHo4InVZxRhoK8ArWO9h2chHVBIC00NtqoQWxNxwPOSVRDh N99a3mVHA5HOAhtbpWE9PeAhc6d8Jo6l5WKgauDp/+UrVjJT0ay7ibtn3DZf2ut17OIR xmnND3wEX+fEABatCpWeWev85wFt3d4vOpSL8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.120.1 with SMTP id s1mr871117wfc.245.1256718369431; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:26:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:26:09 +0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b9c6fe2cb30476fa8bf9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0b9c6fe2cb30476fa8bf9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Wang, The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order Best Regards, Jeff Zhang On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang wrote: > Hi, friends > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, So i > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring the > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which type > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some detail > answer, thanks for you help. > --001636e0b9c6fe2cb30476fa8bf9-- From general-return-661-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 28 08:48:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31934 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 08:48:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 08:48:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 78408 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78336 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 08:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78324 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 08:48:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:48:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hadoopmaillist@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:48:12 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so570096yxe.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xrYAcS4IY2jjzpJ7MglaweJaXDhYr9qHU+U/BxarTvY=; b=ZWR7AO+E4yQrTFuRy8hA2jm5MLfjqhzu/L7a+PkekbQNi1VyNZvXGJ/HfyO4fOC+nu xm9H+Fv/KxC3gtkM00Whj1QE74mRq6ijsC/MgtwQVks4HUuLdoo/cPMGdsN0liqWYXhN vVA02byK2Z1fWqeyopZaDCwPNc+juUJFto3ws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dvJEiZOOhVjbTDUzRA9ejLAf++G2tbUylyscgKV8U5hRbKwcg+r+HCEfoCnDYUA9Nt ertuRyGYOazBlD+LDYAt/bWdCmwxt8uksAhCND8wb6RshRX8XZvo/pLRMjLsSRoOE7Oa qE8AhOY/l1bpr9IVde6dMygeZrlzEGVSwHjwI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.62.22 with SMTP id k22mr9955264aga.48.1256719671784; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:47:51 +0800 Message-ID: <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: lei wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362839e69e764f0476fad915 --0016362839e69e764f0476fad915 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? should it be comparable ? How to make sure them in order?sort it first? I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Wang, > > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > > Best Regards, > > Jeff Zhang > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang > wrote: > > > Hi, friends > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, So i > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring the > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which type > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some > detail > > answer, thanks for you help. > > > --0016362839e69e764f0476fad915-- From general-return-662-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 28 09:12:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38298 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 09:12:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 09:12:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 97509 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 09:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97454 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 09:12:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97444 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 09:12:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:12:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.50] (HELO mail-pw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.160.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:12:18 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so740612pwi.29 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:11:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BAioKTFm/huReGXArKGLPbf0DI6a9azitGsz4GMPRCc=; b=sO7SeaVj4VyDSPCqJG92E69pqgRtVXzpl/4bsnelAtP45v3LRvHHCKic9mxicA5zD8 rPVe2Kttwu4DZtezukTDiV5mHJMBiGN6WeRJOfXONC47ORq4ndgqvXPQ8n7/8Bc1Ltcr pBnaWyQVUpCL1/x/E0k8FmpaauwThHxUy25VI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NapSjlX6RhiXY4FbRHevH6A3TE19N6opEwZ+WgDJXEE77rzfVsYAvb2bTIKHnJkYjY QnDt7DCKeTIxgXv+UDTiv8Z0M+fEsmje/7hzCzWyQAYUaoDrbNbp2JfzZoAU2JqD9tNr GKOvaNxvp/5/zx5a01n4ZSgEGhANLikhbW/1A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.30 with SMTP id y30mr1444970wfi.229.1256721116723; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:11:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:56 +0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502ce03be7ca70476fb2f44 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502ce03be7ca70476fb2f44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile instead ? The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build index on its keys. So its keys must be in order. If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both of the data file and index file You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details about how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile Jeff Zhang On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang wrote: > but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? should it > be > comparable ? > How to make sure them in order?sort it first? > I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > Hi Wang, > > > > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into > > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, friends > > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, So > i > > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring the > > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which > type > > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some > > detail > > > answer, thanks for you help. > > > > > > --00504502ce03be7ca70476fb2f44-- From general-return-663-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 28 22:54:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35064 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2009 22:54:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2009 22:54:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 29454 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 22:54:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29359 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2009 22:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29346 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2009 22:54:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:54:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of slimtbourbi@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.226] (HELO mail-ew0-f226.google.com) (209.85.219.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:54:27 +0000 Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so1311423ewy.29 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Kg79npvJ8QKg5hWbIhirpfjYY8PP7odBatHI4Xi/glY=; b=nhnbhGKYm4FzXu3e1nQgDkCRyfF+HUJ0S/HmnhxUDxnhV4b9PgVFTpN2aD6Ad/VWup Tzu4WWJkhc4fG3CY5CoMVMzPpcUqkncYPNaMCh9b34d4r1UZmfeLq7wlyLrViOXp8jkd ge3vWlHMZqpf713edPPiFI3Q+xXyP8Fsexexo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=od4CDb+dUxENn23RI47VhxIFCDDbTL71iVzCWcCWljmrpcSuHKuQmiBjSmz9B/Ezxo tlhG8irgkMlaKngNvDXD8zsSFEvonKs16HzKpPIP8EcNfaGMN0YZnQex5gGSfufXxy/k /UBQKtZMzyrk2UmXlJzhmtQVC3QEondUzB2Og= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.131 with SMTP id w3mr242104wee.156.1256770447736; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:54:07 +0100 Message-ID: <78aa0af90910281554v441325faxbcd52ca8144457cb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: try hadoop on amazon From: slim tebourbi To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7787f19ff98047706acc2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7787f19ff98047706acc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello guys, Is there any way to use the amazon's services for free just to make tests? Or any other services that allow this? thxs. --0016e6d7787f19ff98047706acc2-- From general-return-664-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 00:37:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66712 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 00:37:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 00:37:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 14501 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 00:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14402 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 00:37:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14391 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 00:37:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:37:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matei@eecs.berkeley.edu designates 169.229.60.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [169.229.60.87] (HELO gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.60.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:37:07 +0000 Received: from dhcp-44-233.eecs.berkeley.edu (dhcp-44-233.EECS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.44.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.3/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n9T0aiIj001476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Subject: Re: try hadoop on amazon From: Matei Zaharia In-Reply-To: <78aa0af90910281554v441325faxbcd52ca8144457cb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:36:43 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <35ECE16E-82D6-4BE8-ABBE-0B765C298E3D@eecs.berkeley.edu> References: <78aa0af90910281554v441325faxbcd52ca8144457cb@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If you just want to develop and test Hadoop applications, you can run Hadoop on your own machine by following the Quick Start instructions linked at http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/. If you want to run on a cluster, Amazon is very cheap for small computations (several dollars per hour). On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:54 PM, slim tebourbi wrote: > Hello guys, > Is there any way to use the amazon's services for free just to make > tests? > Or any other services that allow this? > thxs. From general-return-665-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 00:53:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76819 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 00:53:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 00:53:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22703 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 00:53:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22630 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 00:53:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22620 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 00:53:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:53:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hadoopmaillist@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:53:38 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so1531308ywh.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:53:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ExACVlwQe4/LC0yJmccT3F7XKaj4a3CqTCm9uZZnBQc=; b=fSkXJ5kT4qBW1ud+w2MOdRX9+yoCtuZatfrHMxJpMhYe7XF/SbwhMIDFDMlR8Z246l feOkWK1//diOVIcILLgjn9Uyq1jkKqr3LUxEMfrRnqmQJIEqYRsx579yNwih7glrDYOk drHLZzG909cQNHupvdMkMUj06d4mIR7jdSlQ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=epOq2yQSsoIWilZkXUdCmi0obnGo4soTA06rxYesycsrceRGamkWAvIYQ5YcfZ6RNl 2buEzY9Osund4KXK6R5c4KwaKtCqbx1ojpM4ZbSIyiIlC4DRLnNKQ7vQC/aryjDota+d 8Oc9dA0gJoDCRXRq85ho+vpuLv9oMqIk2aScc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.105.1 with SMTP id h1mr730907anm.126.1256777596954; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:53:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:53:16 +0800 Message-ID: <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: lei wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi,juff, thanks for your comments. I did read this book early, I use MapFile to store my web pages for random access. First I think the SquenceFile conversion as a solution, howerve, the problem is that I need append the new pages to the MapFile by minute or second, so I didn't think SquenceFile conversion can manage this. Would you give me some suggestion? Think your very much! Best wishes. On 10/28/09, Jeff Zhang wrote: > I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile instead ? > > The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build index on > its keys. So its keys must be in order. > > If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to > SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. > > About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: > 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop > 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both of the > data file and index file > > > You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details about > how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile > > Jeff Zhang > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang wrote: > >> but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? should it >> be >> comparable ? >> How to make sure them in order?sort it first? >> I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: >> >> > Hi Wang, >> > >> > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into >> > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Jeff Zhang >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, friends >> > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, >> > > So >> i >> > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring the >> > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which >> type >> > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some >> > detail >> > > answer, thanks for you help. >> > > >> > >> > From general-return-666-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 02:17:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95508 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 02:17:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 02:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 81028 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:17:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80959 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:17:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80949 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 02:17:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:17:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zjffdu@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:17:10 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so971891pxi.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ff1oz9ZLaJ16D0RA08b5/Fhes8xdRz+IokgpZv5hOtY=; b=pRa9Anp2GEY2hpInN5VLVVUMwT/W8vSDMaIXOhux0F+864WPqcwz7uHtjfhmj2wZg6 2Y/w+qECI+Irc9I733vDMN4GAAEJUKFDq4MEzo8gLosMz2IBva8vIyqr/4WWsku6KIjh 7SXc0/RCYw9CgA9q3RSgcSDkYtKNjgVLb5BGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fz5YroDPnQjtjQgotVpT1WUFIfAnPJVu7OeJA3RxRl3izD5yXtbQe2qOm/VudHhhCk yGMEpPirn/Vln32x9sliArlRQSm42Z0RHRL6U7J00f+tLxE+jbDLUf/CuoC892qF12eC PdYsOuAxqDAn4+QNxGeYz4CQRSKKJVDPxwGuM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.248.41 with SMTP id v41mr1554084wfh.284.1256782608830; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:16:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:16:48 +0800 Message-ID: <8211a1320910281916v3ea4f5c1vc4b23fa0260c753@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: Jeff Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cb28f58ff7047709801f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502cb28f58ff7047709801f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I guess maybe HBase will be fit for you. HBase is a distributed database built upon Hadoop. You can use the url as the row key and put other fields into columns. then you can retrieve the web page through HBase Client API and insert new web page into it. The performance of HBase 0.20 is good enough for you. Best Regards, Jeff zhang On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:53 AM, lei wang wrote: > hi,juff, thanks for your comments. > I did read this book early, I use MapFile to store my web pages for > random access. > First I think the SquenceFile conversion as a solution, howerve, the > problem is that I need append the new pages to the MapFile by minute > or second, so I didn't think SquenceFile conversion can manage this. > Would you give me some suggestion? Think your very much! > > Best wishes. > > On 10/28/09, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile > instead ? > > > > The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build index > on > > its keys. So its keys must be in order. > > > > If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to > > SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. > > > > About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: > > 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop > > 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both of > the > > data file and index file > > > > > > You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details > about > > how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang > wrote: > > > >> but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? should it > >> be > >> comparable ? > >> How to make sure them in order?sort it first? > >> I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Wang, > >> > > >> > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into > >> > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > >> > > >> > Best Regards, > >> > > >> > Jeff Zhang > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi, friends > >> > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the hadoop, > >> > > So > >> i > >> > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring > the > >> > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", which > >> type > >> > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me some > >> > detail > >> > > answer, thanks for you help. > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > --00504502cb28f58ff7047709801f-- From general-return-667-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 02:22:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96366 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 02:22:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 02:22:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86083 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:22:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85998 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85988 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 02:22:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:22:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hadoopmaillist@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.185] (HELO mail-yw0-f185.google.com) (209.85.211.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:22:12 +0000 Received: by ywh15 with SMTP id 15so1601243ywh.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ek75P3Fv4EMf3UxvOXdmflp4fTdQdwpl6FLTNKAaP0c=; b=H+q6bqsb85THFoJO7Ll/MDkX1ofZKULCl2egLfSoXw2bpy6iHk/lIaw4qkxP9empD6 a15v1rtplxvbtfQ4Yma4GZdWODgT0sYtGGo2XVxbEfzz/yntMVgSTe9sZj5Q/HbmxYzK nWuQJBqoYpzO3hCdx53cg7lqLWNCm9qA4Z7BQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=POnfzUwhyOVHudimFLL/HvZQAqJnUJgzfMnbnoBxha9ORqFZTW8r4VJLAj4dbniLG6 s8Dr3PseCe5el/PBa4BA4qhpK00QwTPfIzhsuKvcO2ajsGEgEcKGvvkQpGVbfE5W8mLH El5FboR6sSPXlJATwUW8R0sy4F3sRKhIri0CQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.224.3 with SMTP id w3mr718520ang.108.1256782911049; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:21:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8211a1320910281916v3ea4f5c1vc4b23fa0260c753@mail.gmail.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910281916v3ea4f5c1vc4b23fa0260c753@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:21:50 +0800 Message-ID: <5c86176b0910281921x4d19970aqb5ddd0aca435bb80@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: lei wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163623b154f90f9d04770992ce --00163623b154f90f9d04770992ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh, I have tried hbase in the early. But I think HDFS may give me a choice. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > I guess maybe HBase will be fit for you. HBase is a distributed database > built upon Hadoop. > You can use the url as the row key and put other fields into columns. > > then you can retrieve the web page through HBase Client API and insert new > web page into it. The performance of HBase 0.20 is good enough for you. > > Best Regards, > Jeff zhang > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:53 AM, lei wang > wrote: > > > hi,juff, thanks for your comments. > > I did read this book early, I use MapFile to store my web pages for > > random access. > > First I think the SquenceFile conversion as a solution, howerve, the > > problem is that I need append the new pages to the MapFile by minute > > or second, so I didn't think SquenceFile conversion can manage this. > > Would you give me some suggestion? Think your very much! > > > > Best wishes. > > > > On 10/28/09, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile > > instead ? > > > > > > The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build index > > on > > > its keys. So its keys must be in order. > > > > > > If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to > > > SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. > > > > > > About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: > > > 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop > > > 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both of > > the > > > data file and index file > > > > > > > > > You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details > > about > > > how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang > > wrote: > > > > > >> but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? should > it > > >> be > > >> comparable ? > > >> How to make sure them in order?sort it first? > > >> I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". > > >> > > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Wang, > > >> > > > >> > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records into > > >> > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > > >> > > > >> > Best Regards, > > >> > > > >> > Jeff Zhang > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi, friends > > >> > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the > hadoop, > > >> > > So > > >> i > > >> > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writring > > the > > >> > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", > which > > >> type > > >> > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me > some > > >> > detail > > >> > > answer, thanks for you help. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > --00163623b154f90f9d04770992ce-- From general-return-668-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 02:28:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97197 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 02:28:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 02:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89481 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:27:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89406 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 02:27:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89396 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 02:27:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:27:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.59.59.114] (HELO trironport1.altair.com) (67.59.59.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:27:51 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,643,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="9275828" Received: from unknown (HELO TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com) ([204.235.24.175]) by trironport1.altair.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2009 22:27:30 -0400 Received: from TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) by TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:28:35 -0400 From: Lori Ann Martin To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:27:27 -0400 Subject: RE: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile Thread-Topic: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile Thread-Index: AcpYPs0r5gtR30s0RTOc6Flt94ng1QAAIaqA Message-ID: <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112C5714B34@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910281916v3ea4f5c1vc4b23fa0260c753@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281921x4d19970aqb5ddd0aca435bb80@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5c86176b0910281921x4d19970aqb5ddd0aca435bb80@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 heck out www.HiQube.com or www.pbsgridworks.com -----Original Message----- From: lei wang [mailto:hadoopmaillist@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:22 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile Oh, I have tried hbase in the early. But I think HDFS may give me a choice. Thanks. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > I guess maybe HBase will be fit for you. HBase is a distributed databas= e > built upon Hadoop. > You can use the url as the row key and put other fields into columns. > > then you can retrieve the web page through HBase Client API and insert ne= w > web page into it. The performance of HBase 0.20 is good enough for you. > > Best Regards, > Jeff zhang > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:53 AM, lei wang > wrote: > > > hi,juff, thanks for your comments. > > I did read this book early, I use MapFile to store my web pages for > > random access. > > First I think the SquenceFile conversion as a solution, howerve, the > > problem is that I need append the new pages to the MapFile by minute > > or second, so I didn't think SquenceFile conversion can manage this. > > Would you give me some suggestion? Think your very much! > > > > Best wishes. > > > > On 10/28/09, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile > > instead ? > > > > > > The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build ind= ex > > on > > > its keys. So its keys must be in order. > > > > > > If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to > > > SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. > > > > > > About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: > > > 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop > > > 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both o= f > > the > > > data file and index file > > > > > > > > > You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details > > about > > > how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang > > wrote: > > > > > >> but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? shoul= d > it > > >> be > > >> comparable ? > > >> How to make sure them in order?sort it first? > > >> I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". > > >> > > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote= : > > >> > > >> > Hi Wang, > > >> > > > >> > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records in= to > > >> > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > > >> > > > >> > Best Regards, > > >> > > > >> > Jeff Zhang > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi, friends > > >> > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the > hadoop, > > >> > > So > > >> i > > >> > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When writri= ng > > the > > >> > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", > which > > >> type > > >> > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me > some > > >> > detail > > >> > > answer, thanks for you help. > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > From general-return-669-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 04:30:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18148 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 04:30:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 04:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 65253 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65112 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:30:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65094 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 04:30:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:30:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:30:45 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so1183968iwn.2 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+P4ps4m4tFgYn4FItNPq5QoE0G0D/NtxzK96/jGUXbk=; b=lInWYBrZAidvuCUUz5lKl7qPm+hEoHfFA9/G1IG8gr6LU313/NB02cFILlao6uTb8H jAGwtard2HJ8Udhfn1zBPYAOXfWoEbtRJsIPjhEvbtRj+o0t7IATt2uzeQsxq8ClqJ1c KcRCV+pzogWtQhms6xU6kTSZnQe2pVRFt20oE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=xzoHYTyKZYeIW07zjNWRvW8PiTuJxOp6fhhPljD223Dn58zhMp2sf9LARXlFPQo3Hy M/aQ2YEUkU+D49/tlg3udEzjwb7cq0ganrtkNLq268iSR0WQBpsE+YuKmlKEPitZmA74 edYcXR/QVYbgDyouJzM6nwAB4+bL712bEFfT8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.10.16 with SMTP id n16mr2133517ibn.24.1256790624609; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:30:24 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: S3 Exception for a Map Reduce job on EC2 From: Harshit Kumar To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325575d12bca8c204770b5ece --000325575d12bca8c204770b5ece Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi There is 1 GB of rdf/owl files that I am executing on EC2. Execution throws the following exception ------------------- 08/11/19 16:08:27 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3Exception: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAborted*A conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against **this** resource*. Please try again.324E696A4BCA8731{REMOVED} at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:74) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.initialize(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:63) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.$Proxy2.initialize(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.NativeS3FileSystem.initialize(NativeS3FileSystem.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.getFileSystem(Path.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:158) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:210) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJob(JobClient.java:742) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.submitAndMonitorJob(StreamJob.java:925) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.go(StreamJob.java:115) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.HadoopStreaming.main(HadoopStreaming.java:33) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) Caused by: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAbortedA conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against this resource. Please try again.{REMOVED}{REMOVED} at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRequest(RestS3Service.java:424) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRestPut(RestS3Service.java:734) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createObjectImpl(RestS3Service.java:1357) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createBucketImpl(RestS3Service.java:1234) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1390) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1158) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1177) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:69) ... 29 more --------------------- There were like 50 failed map tasks out of total of 1141 maps. Though hadoop job tracker successfully executed failed tasks again, but if a task fails, and then restarting it again, takes execution time. If somehow, this exception can be avoided altogether, program execution will be faster. Came across a JIRA post that says, the exception is because s3 tries to create a bucket which it should not create, and a patch is also posted for the same. Applied the patch, but still the same error. IMO, this error is because a operation is trying to access a part of file which is already been accessed by another map job. Please help resolve this issue or pass on any pointers that can suggest what is the source of error? Thanks and Regards H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.comg H. Kumar Phone(Mobile): +82-10-2892-9663 Phone(Office): +82-31- skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.com --000325575d12bca8c204770b5ece-- From general-return-670-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 04:36:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19097 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 04:36:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 04:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 72129 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:36:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72033 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:36:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72014 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 04:36:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:36:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hkumar.arora@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.171] (HELO mail-iw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:35:56 +0000 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so1186026iwn.2 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/Ax7fpwjTtFK4gH3CZ7EFjTIpt2VF+GJAnhdDmvIQXc=; b=h1DO3CJIhH30raqFO9qdg4/NTpPMNAwrzPfbhTejLZLZY+hlTCp9Ya5t6GLVnFNU67 W0R5ZRTcRo6G4UcoamiU/r21iOg9pgfjrSIQemOZb8aMxhhaTkaJf8m7fAop0Gi5proJ caWdXU+MRkjd84/XpU3DMysqAz0efy8NymgNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aUa8cua+r9RNLycgn+zPiaiHvX2L5o4UhBzvrgW4uY7tbxWa7mqW9VPJLsxv3+mMMo ZBXhTs0reOk4FFZBe2+kLiJd7oGysDBcv7Wn16wfDM3MX0vYdD8B5Dvw2djjjcqRWCC4 baT26yGcv8L98gIMpuFIPwYedZbXkyxIqP68Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.122.103 with SMTP id k39mr4570229ibr.10.1256790933361; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:35:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:35:33 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: S3 Exception for a Map Reduce job on EC2 From: Harshit Kumar To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e646084823d2ea04770b719c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e646084823d2ea04770b719c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi There is 1 GB of rdf/owl files that I am executing on EC2. Execution throws the following exception ------------------- 08/11/19 16:08:27 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3Exception: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAborted*A conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against **this** resource*. Please try again.324E696A4BCA8731{REMOVED} at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:74) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.initialize(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:63) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.$Proxy2.initialize(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.NativeS3FileSystem.initialize(NativeS3FileSystem.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.createFileSystem(FileSystem.java:1339) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.access$300(FileSystem.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Cache.get(FileSystem.java:1351) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.get(FileSystem.java:213) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path.getFileSystem(Path.java:175) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.listStatus(FileInputFormat.java:158) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileInputFormat.getSplits(FileInputFormat.java:210) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJob(JobClient.java:742) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.submitAndMonitorJob(StreamJob.java:925) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob.go(StreamJob.java:115) at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.HadoopStreaming.main(HadoopStreaming.java:33) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:155) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.run(JobShell.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobShell.main(JobShell.java:68) Caused by: org.jets3t.service.S3ServiceException: S3 PUT failed for '/' XML Error Message: OperationAbortedA conflicting conditional operation is currently in progress against this resource. Please try again.{REMOVED}{REMOVED} at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRequest(RestS3Service.java:424) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.performRestPut(RestS3Service.java:734) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createObjectImpl(RestS3Service.java:1357) at org.jets3t.service.impl.rest.httpclient.RestS3Service.createBucketImpl(RestS3Service.java:1234) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1390) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1158) at org.jets3t.service.S3Service.createBucket(S3Service.java:1177) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.createBucket(Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore.java:69) ... 29 more --------------------- There were like 50 failed map tasks out of total of 1141 maps. Though hadoop job tracker successfully executed failed tasks again, but if a task fails, and then restarting it again, takes execution time. If somehow, this exception can be avoided altogether, program execution will be faster. Came across a JIRA post that says, the exception is because s3 tries to create a bucket which it should not create, and a patch is also posted for the same. Applied the patch, but still the same error. IMO, this error is because a operation is trying to access a part of file which is already been accessed by another map job. Please help resolve this issue or pass on any pointers that can suggest what is the source of error? Thanks and Regards H. Kumar skype: harshit900 Blog: http://harshitkumar.wordpress.com Website: http:/kumarharmuscat.tripod.comg --0016e646084823d2ea04770b719c-- From general-return-671-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 29 04:49:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22010 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 04:49:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 04:49:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 82030 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:49:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81872 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 04:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81862 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 04:49:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:49:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hadoopmaillist@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.194] (HELO mail-yx0-f194.google.com) (209.85.210.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:49:32 +0000 Received: by yxe32 with SMTP id 32so1715885yxe.5 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:49:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Wf/eS6slndxEMZdDbYOH9tLQ6zW1WFUnicTeKIt2WRc=; b=w5cuyFs2iHsTIjaWsjyWYtS65l6W1uBqycq7ZvVw7k7YYyAsQtpepLy8StStNFE4AE AB+u2c72cZNQrmFkoC7dVUSjKDoz1UsXMDlsAK1LFrn8JwhWjv0WqZVKot2ZH6VVzHpl 1wpAkGQqnhVLAdnoBkV5U76Ptx2ZveEB1hFiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dUP0W0a24FnB2T6lNs97JtCefztHNBC33BYXXPuHMFpPlumzSneH7n5wEC9dUSDulA Jozg6C4r+2Q34HPptTeffL5w08stpZSF5HPfZs5cWzj5Ryqviq0db2xi+bAZbjnj8uIB sitTfukWmJpw+I+xoaocnfkh1AExfSQ6xlyak= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.165.36 with SMTP id s36mr756279ano.95.1256791751711; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:49:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112C5714B34@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> References: <5c86176b0910280114i79370febrfb4bbdd833c64811@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280126t62f0101fg547acf8fc0f702d7@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910280147s593aac15lc08e08b714135aea@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910280211tc4f19fdk88c695939b629b91@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281753y5dffb328m3de2f48cebd3bca6@mail.gmail.com> <8211a1320910281916v3ea4f5c1vc4b23fa0260c753@mail.gmail.com> <5c86176b0910281921x4d19970aqb5ddd0aca435bb80@mail.gmail.com> <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112C5714B34@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:49:11 +0800 Message-ID: <5c86176b0910282149g4e7b800aleae35af5eae19ce@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile From: lei wang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bac7eadb5204770ba17f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5bac7eadb5204770ba17f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I cann't understand why you give me two web sites. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Lori Ann Martin wrote: > heck out www.HiQube.com or www.pbsgridworks.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: lei wang [mailto:hadoopmaillist@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:22 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Need Help: The problem with text key of MapFile > > Oh, I have tried hbase in the early. > But I think HDFS may give me a choice. > Thanks. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > I guess maybe HBase will be fit for you. HBase is a distributed > database > > built upon Hadoop. > > You can use the url as the row key and put other fields into columns. > > > > then you can retrieve the web page through HBase Client API and insert > new > > web page into it. The performance of HBase 0.20 is good enough for you. > > > > Best Regards, > > Jeff zhang > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:53 AM, lei wang > > wrote: > > > > > hi,juff, thanks for your comments. > > > I did read this book early, I use MapFile to store my web pages for > > > random access. > > > First I think the SquenceFile conversion as a solution, howerve, the > > > problem is that I need append the new pages to the MapFile by minute > > > or second, so I didn't think SquenceFile conversion can manage this. > > > Would you give me some suggestion? Think your very much! > > > > > > Best wishes. > > > > > > On 10/28/09, Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > > I do not know why you need use MapFile, could you use SequenceFile > > > instead ? > > > > > > > > The MapFile's advantage is its read performance, because it build > index > > > on > > > > its keys. So its keys must be in order. > > > > > > > > If you really want to use MapFile, you can first write your data to > > > > SequenceFile and then covert it to MapFile. > > > > > > > > About how to convert SequenceFile to MapFile: > > > > 1. Sort the SequenceFile using sort in examples of hadoop > > > > 2. create index for the output of the above step. then you get both > of > > > the > > > > data file and index file > > > > > > > > > > > > You an refer Tom Whilte's book "Hadoop definitive guide" for details > > > about > > > > how to convert SequenceFile into MapFile > > > > > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, lei wang > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> but now, "url" is not in order, must the key be intwritable ? > should > > it > > > >> be > > > >> comparable ? > > > >> How to make sure them in order?sort it first? > > > >> I just want to insert the pages for random acess by "url ". > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Zhang > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Wang, > > > >> > > > > >> > The keys of MapFile should be in order, so when you add records > into > > > >> > MapFile, you should make sure you insert them in order > > > >> > > > > >> > Best Regards, > > > >> > > > > >> > Jeff Zhang > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, lei wang < > hadoopmaillist@gmail.com > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, friends > > > >> > > I need store the web pages(a huge one) in the MapFile of the > > hadoop, > > > >> > > So > > > >> i > > > >> > > did use the url as the key, and its type is "text", When > writring > > > the > > > >> > > records into the mapfile, it give an error as "out of order", > > which > > > >> type > > > >> > > should I choose to represent the key "url", can anyone give me > > some > > > >> > detail > > > >> > > answer, thanks for you help. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --001636c5bac7eadb5204770ba17f-- From general-return-1479-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 01 16:42:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62175 invoked from network); 1 May 2010 16:42:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 May 2010 16:42:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 50840 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2010 16:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50771 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2010 16:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50763 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2010 16:42:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 May 2010 16:42:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_FRT_CONTACT,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lars.george@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 May 2010 16:42:03 +0000 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so853981wwb.35 for ; Sat, 01 May 2010 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PITVrkVbsPTbZROAV0572EVPsYL+YJ85Iid99+fiICI=; b=iYYLzyrG6FW99oScAAegxjsnxP0bhms07rHKKulyoKsbRfEHAImNWj0UAG26ePK2O5 IVZ/hgnMIqO7IwYzbMG951hchtw9WL3RavzWbijXz/iKE/++uN8a6veRJVuGfLnN5Xrv FK59nHkwItXph6cKI+/N+1F/0Ts6MExEBwmk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=wLDuu35nku9fYlZw2tnWgoozPlUxHgY7x5F0MjZ9C80Ae2q1C3CfT23idMeFUyEl2l rb2WMr4vdJ0/KAo/SYjT+dA4ernuAFjvoEZs1KyEiH8N9y7VKAsOyyHyzazoSj4MFZDk 6XAF8f4gd8RY+SnUR/3OJnXpDx/FnkpPpjY58= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.2 with SMTP id k2mr2038221wef.56.1272732103417; Sat, 01 May 2010 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.72 with HTTP; Sat, 1 May 2010 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 18:41:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 3rd Munich OpenHUG Meeting From: Lars George To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 3rd Munich OpenHUG Meeting I am pleased to invite you to our third Munich Open Hadoop User Group Meeti= ng! Like always we are looking forward to see everyone again and are welcoming new attendees to join our group. We are enthusiast about all things related to scalable, distributed storage system. We are not limiting us to a particular system but appreciate anyone who would like to share about their experiences. When: Thursday May 6th, 2010 at 6pm (open end) Where: eCircle AG, Nymphenburger Stra=DFe 86, 80636 M=FCnchen ["Bruckmann" Building, "U1 Mailinger Str", map http://www.ecircle.com/de/kontakt/anfahrt.html (in German) and look for the signs] Thanks again to Bob Schulze from eCircle for providing the infrastructure. We have a talk scheduled by Stefan Seelmann who is a member of the project committee for the Apache Directory project. This is followed by an open discussion. Please RSVP here: Xing: https://www.xing.com/events/3rd-munich-openhug-meeting-506082 Yahoo Upcoming: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/5771044/BY/Mnchen/3rd-Munich-OpenHUG-Meetin= g/eCircle-AG Looking forward to seeing you there! Best regards, Lars From general-return-1480-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 03 04:57:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65037 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 04:57:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 04:57:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 58649 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 04:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57257 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 04:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57249 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 04:57:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 04:57:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.200.80.34] (HELO smtp1.es.uci.edu) (128.200.80.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 04:57:33 +0000 Received: from [169.234.248.13] (vcv248013.vpn.uci.edu [169.234.248.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o434vAtf013048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 21:57:11 -0700 X-UCInetID: vayyalas Message-ID: <4BDE57AA.70502@uci.edu> Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 21:57:14 -0700 From: Vandana Ayyalasomayajula User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Problem with configuring Fair Schduler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi All, I am trying to configure fair scheduler in hadoop. I have followed all the instructions given in hadoop common docs ( http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/fair_scheduler.html#Configuring+the+Fair+scheduler ). But when I try to click on the job queue in the job tracker page , I see the following exception: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FairScheduler.getJobs(FairScheduler.java:765) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobqueue_005fdetails_jsp._jspService(jobqueue_005fdetails_jsp.java:64) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:363) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:864) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:533) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:207) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) If anybody has come across this problem, please do let me know where I am going wrong. Thanks for the help. Vandana From general-return-1481-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 03 05:56:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71118 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 05:56:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 05:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 81937 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 05:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81630 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 05:56:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66410 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 05:17:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kumar@bike.snu.ac.kr In-Reply-To: <4BDE57AA.70502@uci.edu> References: <4BDE57AA.70502@uci.edu> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:16:41 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: f3e95d672fe947db Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with configuring Fair Schduler From: Kumar Harshit To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed6d74b55a340485a9b274 --001636ed6d74b55a340485a9b274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Can I have a look at your project report on Pig and Hive query execution? I stumbled upon it but couldnt download it. Thanks Kumar On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Vandana Ayyalasomayajula wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to configure fair scheduler in hadoop. I have followed all the > instructions given in hadoop common docs ( > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/fair_scheduler.html#Configuring+the+Fair+scheduler). But when I try to click on the job queue in the job tracker page , I see > the following exception: > > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FairScheduler.getJobs(FairScheduler.java:765) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobqueue_005fdetails_jsp._jspService(jobqueue_005fdetails_jsp.java:64) > at > org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:363) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at > org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:864) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:533) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:207) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at > org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > at > org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > > If anybody has come across this problem, please do let me know where I am > going wrong. > > Thanks for the help. > Vandana > --001636ed6d74b55a340485a9b274-- From general-return-1482-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 04 18:32:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95040 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 18:32:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 18:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 55251 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:32:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54500 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54407 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:32:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:32:14 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o44IUsbm069300; Tue, 4 May 2010 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=OZzWuLYencBol07dukoBvrZWU08sesiS1inx8L38hUIAJIvGq98MyaCPL9KWMHzs Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 4 May 2010 11:29:51 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 11:29:50 -0700 Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group - May 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: RE: Hadoop User Group - May 19th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: Acrrt8hyTLFBKu7ESwWjdinJLK+osw== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FEA3857EB@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FEA3857EBSP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FEA3857EBSP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Agenda is available for the upcoming HUG. Hope to see you all there. http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/13048582/ thanks Dekel Register today for Hadoop Summit 2010 June 29th, Hyatt, Santa Clara, CA http://hadoopsummit2010.eventbrite.com/ Presentation submission deadline extended until May 10th http://developer.yahoo.com/events/hadoopsummit2010/presentationguidelines.h= tml --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FEA3857EBSP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-1483-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 04 20:31:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24675 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 20:31:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 20:31:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 30074 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 20:31:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29875 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 20:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29867 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 20:31:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 20:31:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 20:31:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 24571 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 20:31:11 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 20:31:11 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so274793gwj.35 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.8 with SMTP id k8mr811110iby.93.1273005063761; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.149.73 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 13:31:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSSION] Adopt the Release Manager role for Hadoop From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org After 0.20 was branched in 2008, there have been no releases of Hadoop from trunk despite active development of the mainline. Tom White is working to cut a new release, but given its record in the last year, Hadoop's current release process is in need of justification and/or revision. As Owen suggested earlier, Apache HTTP Server project rules have some compelling features. In particular, the Release Manager seems like a useful role. If Hadoop adopted these rules, it could enable more experimentation in alpha, more frequent releases, and it could still deliver stable versions. That said, moving from our current model immediately to odd/even releases, concurrent releases of minor versions, expressing stability/confidence in versioning, etc. would be a dramatic and likely disruptive shift. Even discussion on adopting these rules would unnecessarily delay the next release. For now, I'd like to propose we adopt only the Release Manager (RM) role described here: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html with the following procedures and caveats: 0) The RM for the next release is confirmed by majority approval of the PMC (at least 3 +1 votes, more +1 than -1 votes). 1) The RM may be replaced by majority approval of the PMC. Similarly, if one wants to cut a release from trunk before the next, scheduled release manager does, a single vote may appoint an intermediate RM (e.g. a vote could add a RM for a new minor release between releases run by Tom and Owen) 2) Until the projects can be released separately, one must have commit privileges on Common, HDFS, and MapReduce to be a RM 3) As in the httpd model, the RM decides how to manage the next release ({date,feature}-based branching, patches included or elided, etc.). However: 3.i) All bug fixes/features/etc. in the release must also be in trunk 3.ii) Only blocker bugs, documentation, etc. should be fixed in a patch release 3.iii) Exceptions to (3.ii) are passed per majority consensus by the committers of the affected projects 4) The product of this process will still become an official release by majority approval in the PMC (3.*) and (4) should be familiar. In the short to medium term, all releases would come off of trunk. If a self-nominated RM for 0.x does not release before 0.y is ready, then 0.y is released as 0.x, the 0.x branch is retired, and the RM for 0.x needs to be reelected to release 0.z (where x < y < z). Does this make sense? If possible, I would like to avoid related, contentious issues on feature branching and versioning and restrict this discussion to whether adopting this role would be useful to producing more frequent Hadoop releases. Tom has volunteered to be the RM for 0.21 and Owen has volunteered for 0.22; each would be confirmed in a vote apart from the vote adopting this modification, which will open once this thread appears to reach consensus. -C From general-return-1484-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 04 21:35:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38334 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 21:35:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 21:35:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 16036 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 21:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15902 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 21:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15894 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 21:35:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of apache@jacobrideout.net designates 74.50.50.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.50.50.180] (HELO jacobrideout.net) (74.50.50.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:35:39 +0000 Received: from mail-wy0-f176.google.com (mail-wy0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jacobrideout.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F6E1400F8 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 15:35:17 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jacobrideout.net; s=2009a; t=1273008918; bh=JoL73HeHsPH/RfTGunBD04jn8EF1lC1Icbf1af4+R FQ=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type; b=e1MVLoH96nLBscV6953GetsjqHEJFQ7i+Pvoyf7LUd6l69bG3Eb87AtHRFEU2fFR/ lNnkxyFiEnnq8/bOQp/3Hvq34f19WQ+ssEvvdM3NoAXYm2nnp9bE+rXVMsvdBc4ucrJ Y9lV/3Sf4ljoVSb7bAJVfvrreoRAC1QzH37bCvk= Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so69431wyb.35 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.155.143 with SMTP id j15mr2699344wek.46.1273008916270; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:35:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 14:34:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Jacob R Rideout Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:34:56 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Boulder/Denver Colorado Hadoop Meetup To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am happy to announce we have started a Hadoop users group in Boulder and Denver Colorado area. We'll be having our next meeting on May 12th at 7pm. I would like to invite anyone in the area to attend. Cold Creek Solutions (a hardware VAR) will be sponsoring with pizza/beer/soda. Details: http://www.meetup.com/Boulder-Denver-Hadoop/ Time: 7pm MDT on 5/12/2010 Location: The offices of Gnip 1610 Pearl Street Boulder, CO 80302 If anyone would like to give a talk please state your topic on the meetup site. Thanks, I hope to see you few of you there! Jacob Rideout From general-return-1485-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 04:57:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13603 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 04:57:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 04:57:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 22356 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 04:57:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22294 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 04:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22286 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 04:57:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.171] (HELO mail-qy0-f171.google.com) (209.85.221.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:57:39 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so138255qyk.5 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:57:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+1vk/Ev+uhE4RnuLLR5SYOJOFslA2CPf2ip661hEkho=; b=YP3iNrcOkAhdQ8YAgPl/YwRFD4IZFxxyctxbC2+zeTiI/wKP0HEJvgrLiGTU+t9+fW BUDZ1pdldCqPgmDsE42kE63dRe25S2HWCeXu1h9u1VzClM9qFTnFpBwyOIt46BtUNYl4 xWmgLOvOb/CvzgNmFHWsPNFlRWttuJu2MylM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hVqHq/YPvlzDWh5Fchy2DecPmWhgeRecfpl++IRCTMwId/DvAS41xxunfvXQSViV/G 3f5KyHY6mXBMXfWxjF40bjYFkoAW+Ad2UPJkAoCcBPa+HLqvHbE5CThiAHddBiCWF1Os O2lAUkXMZ7HqPI2w3MUm0Ay9vJl4PSIbne5l4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.80 with SMTP id g16mr3856358qcn.85.1273035438053; Tue, 04 May 2010 21:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.2.13 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 21:57:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4061df20909100631g5b6b52eeh90a3af5d3b9549ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <14015.97592.qm@web38406.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <93d501de0909091936r5e234e69k80f849fb6a5ed345@mail.gmail.com> <4061df20909100631g5b6b52eeh90a3af5d3b9549ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 21:57:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multicore node clusters From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364edc141259360485d1a991 --0016364edc141259360485d1a991 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I am looking for config parameter similar to the following which would allow us to limit the total number of mapper and reducer tasks: mapred.tasktracker.tasks.maximum Please advise. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Chandraprakash Bhagtani < cpbhagtani@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > You should definitely change mapred.tasktracker.map/reduce.tasks.maximum. > If > your tasks are more CPU bound then you should run the tasks equal to the > number of CPU cores otherwise you can run more tasks than cores. You can > determine CPU and memory usage by running "top" command on datanodes. You > should also take care of following configuration parameters to achieve best > performance > > *mapred.compress.map.output:* Faster data transfer (from mapper to > reducers), saves disk space, faster disk writing. Extra time in compression > and decompression > > *io.sort.mb: *If you have idle physical memory after running all tasks you > can increase this value. But swap space should not be used since it makes > it > slow.* > > **io.sort.factor: *If your map tasks have large number of spills* *then you > should increase this value.It also helps in merging at reducers. > > *mapred.job.reuse.jvm.num.tasks: *The overhead of JVM creation for each > task > is around 1 second. So for the tasks which live for seconds or a few > minutes > and have lengthy initialization, this value can be increased to gain > performance. > > *mapred.reduce.parallel.copies: *For Large jobs (the jobs in which map > output is very large), value of this property can be increased keeping in > mind that it will increase the total CPU usage.* > > **mapred.map/reduce.tasks.speculative.execution: *set to false to gain high > throughput. > > *dfs.block.size* or *mapred.min.split.size* or *mapred.max.split.size* : to > control the number of maps > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Mat Kelcey >wrote: > > > > I've a cluster where every node is a multicore. From doing internet > > searches I've figured out that I definitely need to change > > mapred.tasktracker.tasks.maximum according to the number of clusters. But > > there are definitely other things that I would like to change for example > > mapred.map.tasks. Can someone point me out the list of things I should > > change to get the best performance out of my cluster ? > > > > nothing will give you better results than benchmarking with some jobs > > indicative to your domain! > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, > --0016364edc141259360485d1a991-- From general-return-1486-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 08:11:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57260 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 08:11:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 08:11:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 12575 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 08:11:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12252 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 08:11:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12244 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 08:11:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 08:11:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.166.169.248] (HELO imap.packtpub.com) (83.166.169.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 08:11:44 +0000 Received: by imap.packtpub.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CC065700035; Wed, 5 May 2010 09:11:22 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on imap.pactpub.com X-Spam-Level: Received: from sonyPC (unknown [122.169.12.134]) by imap.packtpub.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F30D570002E for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 09:11:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <851BF33D91AB4949A95E30A285433C67@sonyPC> From: "Kshipra Singh" To: Subject: Author Hadoop Books- Packt Publishing. Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 13:41:18 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02BB_01CAEC58.A3EE2190" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.2.5 ------=_NextPart_000_02BB_01CAEC58.A3EE2190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,=20 I am writing to you for Packt Publishing, the publishers of computer = related books.=20 We are planning to expand the catalogue of our books on databases and = are looking forward to publish some books on NoSQL.=20 Currently we are inviting people interested in writing NoSQL books for = Packt. This doesn't need any past writing experience. All that we need = is an expert subject knowledge, a passion to share it with others and an = ability to communicate clearly in English. So, if you love Hadoop and fancy writing a book, send your book ideas to = us at author@packtpub.com. Even if you don't have a book idea and are = simply interested in authoring a book, we are still keen to hear from = you.=20 More details about the opportunity are available at: = http://authors.packtpub.com/content/inviting-open-source-nosql-databases-= fanatics-write-packt Thanks Kshipra Singh Author Relationship Manager Packt Publishing www.PacktPub.com =20 Skype: kshiprasingh15 Twitter: http://twitter.com/packtauthors =20 Interested in becoming an author? Visit http://authors.packtpub.com for = all the information you need about writing for Packt. ------=_NextPart_000_02BB_01CAEC58.A3EE2190-- From general-return-1487-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 15:30:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60218 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 15:30:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 15:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 69430 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 15:30:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69285 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 15:30:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69082 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 15:30:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 15:30:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.184] (HELO mail-yx0-f184.google.com) (209.85.210.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 15:30:06 +0000 Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so1684221yxe.5 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uj3Bov/3PleLzkX7mTgaZTLaCQrIwiuf5EgvuHhRla4=; b=H0zJhjAe/3ISvzPsV5ZAwR6vYHQNNqE0CyLKvSPLku+n25VoiP0/YqWGRS09/K5CQQ 98euopMbclvd/iAA5QslCSvGPdCo1FGrSMTSQq0O88xkFlSutDBpy1oo8nTO/vNLQHc3 u9M7/0opq6OOswUcJxQVqy3zIS6eWp23/OfsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Aj0AxLsYWGJYwJrH+RaMZBEz2Pusucq0yPEQtgf5bVxBjr7c/4XW59yh7Vy67wN13B k0r3Nag2n6A+SRYcUM6n/Lt74hlB9Z4HVto9KZ0HTCY10vw9nguEUHaD22Na/hXsJ2dO Xdwf9uRwHJksX6r8rAGpo7Ebm8thPesx77BJQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.147.199 with SMTP id m7mr1636594ibv.87.1273073383563; Wed, 05 May 2010 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.32.137 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:29:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop Data Sharing From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e647ecc4cdc9a00485da7e71 --0016e647ecc4cdc9a00485da7e71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, but I am getting some into some "design" problems. I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and in each iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I would need to read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one that iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those values, and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried to test it on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. Any suggestions, please??? Thanks in advance, Renato M. --0016e647ecc4cdc9a00485da7e71-- From general-return-1488-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 16:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80343 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 16:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 16:46:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 16:46:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15992 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 16:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15978 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 16:46:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:46:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:45:53 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2862587bwz.11 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.6.203 with SMTP id a11mr4649539bka.8.1273077931312; Wed, 05 May 2010 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.61.84 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 09:45:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:45:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Adopt the Release Manager role for Hadoop From: Tom White To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Chris, Overall this looks good to me. Thanks for drafting it. Should we create a document for the website that we vote on? I think you've captured most of what we need now in this email, but it would be a good start for the bylaws when we get back to them. I've included a couple more comments inline below. Cheers, Tom On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > After 0.20 was branched in 2008, there have been no releases of Hadoop > from trunk despite active development of the mainline. Tom White is > working to cut a new release, but given its record in the last year, > Hadoop's current release process is in need of justification and/or > revision. > > As Owen suggested earlier, Apache HTTP Server project rules have some > compelling features. In particular, the Release Manager seems like a > useful role. If Hadoop adopted these rules, it could enable more > experimentation in alpha, more frequent releases, and it could still > deliver stable versions. That said, moving from our current model > immediately to odd/even releases, concurrent releases of minor > versions, expressing stability/confidence in versioning, etc. would be > a dramatic and likely disruptive shift. Even discussion on adopting > these rules would unnecessarily delay the next release. > > For now, I'd like to propose we adopt only the Release Manager (RM) > role described here: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html > > with the following procedures and caveats: > > 0) The RM for the next release is confirmed by majority approval of > the PMC (at least 3 +1 votes, more +1 than -1 votes). > 1) The RM may be replaced by majority approval of the PMC. Similarly, > if one wants to cut a release from trunk before the next, scheduled > release manager does, a single vote may appoint an intermediate RM > (e.g. a vote could add a RM for a new minor release between releases > run by Tom and Owen) > 2) Until the projects can be released separately, one must have commit > privileges on Common, HDFS, and MapReduce to be a RM > 3) As in the httpd model, the RM decides how to manage the next > release ({date,feature}-based branching, patches included or elided, > etc.). However: > 3.i) All bug fixes/features/etc. in the release must also be in trunk > 3.ii) Only blocker bugs, documentation, etc. should be fixed in a patch release > 3.iii) Exceptions to (3.ii) are passed per majority consensus by the > committers of the affected projects > 4) The product of this process will still become an official release > by majority approval in the PMC > > (3.*) and (4) should be familiar. > > In the short to medium term, all releases would come off of trunk. Wouldn't this prohibit a point 0.21 release? Do we want to do this? > If > a self-nominated RM for 0.x does not release before 0.y is ready, then > 0.y is released as 0.x, the 0.x branch is retired, and the RM for 0.x > needs to be reelected to release 0.z (where x < y < z). Does this make > sense? I agree with the sentiment, but in practice it might be confusing to release 0.y as 0.x - I worry about getting JIRA issues marked as being fixed in 0.x not 0.y, and in general updating all the references to 0.y (including branches). How about just skipping the 0.x version? > > If possible, I would like to avoid related, contentious issues on > feature branching and versioning and restrict this discussion to > whether adopting this role would be useful to producing more frequent > Hadoop releases. Tom has volunteered to be the RM for 0.21 and Owen > has volunteered for 0.22; each would be confirmed in a vote apart from > the vote adopting this modification, which will open once this thread > appears to reach consensus. -C > From general-return-1489-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 19:01:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17104 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 19:01:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 19:01:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1386 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 19:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1242 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 19:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1233 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 19:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 19:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 19:01:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 16967 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 19:01:06 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 19:01:06 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so992471gwj.35 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.190.204 with SMTP id dj12mr1215882ibb.9.1273086065075; Wed, 05 May 2010 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.149.73 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 12:01:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:01:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Adopt the Release Manager role for Hadoop From: Chris Douglas To: private@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Should we create a document for the website that we vote on? I think > you've captured most of what we need now in this email, but it would > be a good start for the bylaws when we get back to them. I was following the sequence Doug suggested in the last thread on the release process. I can draft a vote if no discussion of this is necessary. >> In the short to medium term, all releases would come off of trunk. > > Wouldn't this prohibit a point 0.21 release? Do we want to do this? Sorry, I meant minor releases. I assumed patch releases per (3.ii) and (3.iii). The rules seem to allow an RM to cut releases from branches as well as trunk, so I was trying to avoid the confusing prospect of releasing, for example, 0.22 from the 0.21 branch instead of from trunk (unless the odd/even release convention were adopted). >> If >> a self-nominated RM for 0.x does not release before 0.y is ready, then >> 0.y is released as 0.x, the 0.x branch is retired, and the RM for 0.x >> needs to be reelected to release 0.z (where x < y < z). Does this make >> sense? > > I agree with the sentiment, but in practice it might be confusing to > release 0.y as 0.x - I worry about getting JIRA issues marked as being > fixed in 0.x not 0.y, and in general updating all the references to > 0.y (including branches). How about just skipping the 0.x version? I meant to describe what's happening with 0.21, more or less. Given requirement (3.i), nothing should be in (unreleased) 0.x that isn't also in trunk. If 0.x has a complex/buggy feature that's preventing it from being released, allowing someone to RM a release without it and call that 0.x, pushing the feature to 0.y is messy, but not as confusing (given Hadoop's deprecation and interface stability guarantees). It's also a merciful way to kill a stuck release without indicting the struggling RM. -C From general-return-1490-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 05 21:26:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47118 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 21:26:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 21:26:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 95462 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 21:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95399 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 21:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95253 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 21:26:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 21:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.187] (HELO mail-qy0-f187.google.com) (209.85.221.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 21:26:23 +0000 Received: by qyk17 with SMTP id 17so456368qyk.12 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 14:26:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MyyAiPlYbST+hAX16jE3xLMlcCv6xED8JA3CGxfdY2I=; b=qV8B65IXlEpLKKAce1kACylulKSXv85bAm3JTdhg2/YItHIShE8jOoU0l6EKw0DsAW 0LJH+DBlEQFBdLTU5cgJRDHH4Ye+9M7XjHTe4ilPlsYuI81zkMAge5U3enLH/tw370r5 hhQY+2i67UAdI4Aw7JoG5pk7/HjCtW+ZtcmpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=Tg7d2K52HaU5CIf0P3MKWQcJlPJRDuLDVExhuE7Ukrc9NlrxzSYRLasNSTdbiKmpYG ffdLudXFpoCcmSAK2dIlP81kogTjsnGS3xyPsJTITldMlanrc9xwUrtCMsWsfBs1VxeK 6HUWnV1ZB9oKONGLWsRm3jvggJgBp3ihLd2Rs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.221.84 with SMTP id ib20mr4700371qcb.93.1273094762478; Wed, 05 May 2010 14:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.220.66 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 14:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 14:26:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 795518b9665c0cf1 Message-ID: Subject: [ANN] HBase-0.20.4 released From: Stack To: HBase Dev List , hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 HBase 0.20.0 is available for download: http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/releases.html The Release Notes are available here [1]. This relesae includes critical fixes, some improvements and performance improvements. We recommend that all upgrade to this latest release. Thanks to all who contributed to this release Yours, The HBase Team From general-return-1491-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 06 01:04:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96023 invoked from network); 6 May 2010 01:04:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 May 2010 01:04:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 44520 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2010 01:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44477 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2010 01:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44469 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2010 01:04:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 01:04:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 01:04:48 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so2958287pxi.35 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 18:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.90.17 with SMTP id s17mr6407317rvl.207.1273107868132; Wed, 05 May 2010 18:04:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.169.13 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 18:04:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 18:04:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd118263da5870485e28698 --000e0cd118263da5870485e28698 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Renato, In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, each pas= s materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads those same files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the last "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memory distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce job to post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write your interi= m results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 and write= s to /iteration1, etc.. If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memory somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed key-value stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate results= . But this will require some integration work on your part. - Aaron On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, but I am > getting some into some "design" problems. > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and in each > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I would need > to > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one that > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those values= , > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried to test = it > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. > Any suggestions, please??? > > Thanks in advance, > > > Renato M. > --000e0cd118263da5870485e28698-- From general-return-1492-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 09:53:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1727 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 09:53:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 09:53:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 19671 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 09:53:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19518 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 09:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19506 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 09:53:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 09:53:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierreact@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 09:53:18 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so676765wye.35 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ExRSK3aHq/L3U3S2dwH9rbJGkmCoXb3gkk0ZcFjCFaE=; b=DaBAm2qEnSo7Hw/G72gkBjF4+riFwgSWSFTU1uBp4ORmUhW72r7gInmwczP6kd4N5S f4T3KrT94910ChHUjsYEk2wGvPPXj2QqX4fzHT07Ivf688poyLRXqj+xEmmb6eRi83gI YtTiKJDRyXa2AWxyetQu9ZLItJt21do9wcnBc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=esLz69hkghfoJuHjLdwP4BB3P2ytgWpr7os4YdrGFLHEFU66Jett3TfuYy3E0hdSe6 3S5dSf6Yfljg1T5l/1uk7W3jeyjwmBcAGPfvjoBLv7tulNwATDUdC0ZAYK1X7IQ3nFR1 ae6Ze7/8kBN/Txa4jqAdWgXx44aNAlaZnSdZg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.137.202 with SMTP id x10mr5543102wbt.26.1273225974771; Fri, 07 May 2010 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.75 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:52:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Could not obtain block blk_ From: Pierre ANCELOT To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b66c2f1f4000485fe057f --0016367b66c2f1f4000485fe057f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, we're having some issues with this... Any idea please? 2010-05-07 05:59:46,998 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=MAP, sessionId= - already initialized 2010-05-07 05:59:54,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block 2010-05-07 06:00:05,493 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block 2010-05-07 06:00:10,358 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block 2010-05-07 06:00:14,945 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: DFS Read: java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 file=/zzz/Dispatch/input/zzz_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_2010_5_6_mr_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_201056.txt_128 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient.java:1812) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1638) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1767) at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(LineRecordReader.java:97) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKeyValue(MapTask.java:423) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.java:67) at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:621) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) --0016367b66c2f1f4000485fe057f-- From general-return-1493-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 10:07:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4881 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 10:07:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 10:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 37494 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37259 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:07:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37249 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 10:07:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:07:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:07:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D442B7DAC for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:07:05 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aW98sMAbUXgV for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:06:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B618EB7D77 for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:06:50 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1273831599.04954@Bew4QoieBv1OTF9xC1Yjog Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o47A6YAP018068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:06:35 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 11:09:33 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not obtain block blk_ References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o47A6YAP018068 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Pierre ANCELOT wrote: > Hello, we're having some issues with this... > Any idea please? > > 2010-05-07 05:59:46,998 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=MAP, sessionId= - already > initialized > 2010-05-07 05:59:54,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not > obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: > java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block > 2010-05-07 06:00:05,493 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not > obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: > java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block > 2010-05-07 06:00:10,358 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not > obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: > java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block > 2010-05-07 06:00:14,945 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: DFS Read: As it says, "No live nodes contain current block". This means: no live datanodes have a copy of the block of that file. Either some nodes have gone offline, a disk failed or it wasn't replicated. > java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 > file=/zzz/Dispatch/input/zzz_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_2010_5_6_mr_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_201056.txt_128 > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient.java:1812) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.java:1638) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1767) > at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(LineRecordReader.java:97) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKeyValue(MapTask.java:423) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.java:67) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:621) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > From general-return-1494-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 10:09:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5166 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 10:09:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 10:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 41457 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41386 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:09:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41378 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 10:09:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:09:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierreact@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:09:35 +0000 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so203288wwb.35 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 03:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qVYTOmIiM528xDugRknJhjEC3PfCi2a3YNRBXQOG3Xw=; b=aiFFQcM0WEw6mNq3lPPJaBu6aWqIMZf4WvPSJ9XJ0umeGpFwA3lrYctmhiwFXHoNDI xQ4G5DyD/cPunzxVqktmHATHQwODEk5cEo5TzDxeQpkGTdDc7QSEQtvKuJ6ejhkF0mpr OS0WfVE3hzonZGW008Wk7LK7aP/I+0SLRG2Y0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=L8rBwwbsYLhascw7lddF6BiLij+wOWZBCa7cEymMWVLwnvVqFacTB1tw1GJ5LxPnc/ OGottjwPdk4N5yB3QDWbTf/OU+X0mXzAClR4SRd9blQ5p1/7SInDuyeOMR+t9DpOY6nb sMCRHWNiX8hlTG3OQRLCrnoTaEe2x3/2JpeK8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.21 with SMTP id k21mr467135wef.68.1273226953441; Fri, 07 May 2010 03:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.154.75 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 03:09:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org> References: <4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 12:09:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Could not obtain block blk_ From: Pierre ANCELOT To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e9a347414e0485fe408f --0016e6d7e9a347414e0485fe408f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All my nodes are up, I can get the file through the DFS client... 0.20.2 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Pierre ANCELOT wrote: > >> Hello, we're having some issues with this... >> Any idea please? >> >> 2010-05-07 05:59:46,998 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: >> Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=3DMAP, sessionId=3D - alr= eady >> initialized >> 2010-05-07 05:59:54,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not >> obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: >> java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block >> 2010-05-07 06:00:05,493 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not >> obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: >> java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block >> 2010-05-07 06:00:10,358 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not >> obtain block blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 from any node: >> java.io.IOException: No live nodes contain current block >> 2010-05-07 06:00:14,945 WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: DFS Read: >> > > As it says, "No live nodes contain current block". > This means: no live datanodes have a copy of the block of that file. Eith= er > some nodes have gone offline, a disk failed or it wasn't replicated. > > > > java.io.IOException: Could not obtain block: >> blk_6180178384047700588_1429320 >> >> file=3D/zzz/Dispatch/input/zzz_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_2010_5_6= _mr_24ED346D41543586AE7342997C07F5C8_201056.txt_128 >> at >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.chooseDataNode(DFSClient= .java:1812) >> at >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.blockSeekTo(DFSClient.ja= va:1638) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSInputStream.read(DFSClient.java:1767= ) >> at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) >> at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) >> at >> >> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader.nextKeyValue(Line= RecordReader.java:97) >> at >> >> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewTrackingRecordReader.nextKeyValue(Ma= pTask.java:423) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.MapContext.nextKeyValue(MapContext.java:67) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper.run(Mapper.java:143) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:621) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) >> at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) >> >> > --=20 http://www.neko-consulting.com Ego sum quis ego servo "Je suis ce que je prot=E8ge" "I am what I protect" --0016e6d7e9a347414e0485fe408f-- From general-return-1495-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 10:30:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7191 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 10:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 10:30:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 58389 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:30:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58217 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 10:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58208 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 10:30:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:30:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:30:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AEEB7E5E for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:30:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ephNC7dR1yps for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:30:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2055B7E2F for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:30:08 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1273832996.95615@2qfPaLs/q5CoN6fhr+kL6g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o47ATq9M018589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:29:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BE3EC53.7030300@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 11:32:51 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not obtain block blk_ References: <4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o47ATq9M018589 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pierre ANCELOT wrote: > All my nodes are up, I can get the file through the DFS client... > 0.20.2 OK, that's interesting. Try looking at the replication count and upping it, or copying the file to make sure its all there. From general-return-1496-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 15:15:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67390 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 15:15:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 15:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 76847 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 15:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76684 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 15:15:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76676 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 15:15:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 15:15:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 15:15:36 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=MNvbvA2w4aqdpxgqz7JyccePeZYycQCAeb1tFCKgYumjp/zDXUbsk3Xj XP/6T6E52fP9y1Kn+LrOiAXfu4WBBzqY7XD4uNFOtkV7bfSaCrJsxB3dU 7v3mqQMMaW8YoNl; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1273245336; x=1304781336; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Could=20not=20obtain=20block=20blk_ |Date:=20Fri,=207=20May=202010=2015:15:14=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<9321E246-3120-421A-B0C6-7575EBF245F6@link edin.com>|To:=20""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<4ff0f662-31f5-4ba5-a4aa-212dc7e8cb43> |In-Reply-To:=20<4BE3EC53.7030300@apache.org>|References: =20=0D=0A=09=20<4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org>=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20<4BE3EC53.7030300@apache.org>; bh=HdLlnmGfb/g2xGJOnO4nHr7xS5CkdbyG6IsnvaeoIo4=; b=tUwhrbKUzm+n7fBi2GPUzareoJm6qulmNh31ft5JoqlxrwOhQ7nj+41W NynN5AY9TNn/OL7fXAfcrMj+PznS0QP5nCjHhDBqD+/sko9T2b7wkq83S 15tDJZHz3PzO/um; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,349,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12754253" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 7 May 2010 08:15:16 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Fri, 7 May 2010 08:15:16 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Fri, 7 May 2010 08:15:15 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Could not obtain block blk_ Thread-Topic: Could not obtain block blk_ Thread-Index: AQHK7cslvRqArxoxHkGfS1sgsrKckJJGNImA////6ICAAAabgIAATuUA Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:15:14 +0000 Message-ID: <9321E246-3120-421A-B0C6-7575EBF245F6@linkedin.com> References: <4BE3E6DD.5050205@apache.org> <4BE3EC53.7030300@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BE3EC53.7030300@apache.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4ff0f662-31f5-4ba5-a4aa-212dc7e8cb43> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 May 2010 15:15:16.0780 (UTC) FILETIME=[196E1EC0:01CAEDF8] On May 7, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Pierre ANCELOT wrote: >> All my nodes are up, I can get the file through the DFS client... >> 0.20.2 >=20 > OK, that's interesting. Try looking at the replication count and upping i= t, or copying the file to make sure its all there. Or running fsck against that file directly.= From general-return-1497-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 17:35:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98277 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 17:35:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 17:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 91845 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 17:35:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91738 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 17:35:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91730 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 17:35:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 17:35:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 17:34:56 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so917198gwj.35 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=P6FTkANRgv2R2YuA4o5jpaAN9rkZGnvsDoy/tUap828=; b=WVwRyZ44xij910nzKvcgGCgN/xLuIgmHzRnsNwGpqoUiaJI9BGvgG9RYra+HQ3UBSv aOEdayF6hNlKR9hGWAE8ZY2lq7mVDYXXpOYo1CshecsxmhSHCupKWz+HUd96KmyePg7M 1hXjgwP7UNCS8XaPpmfy9VOcQNazvRBTzrvs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=O45//0hGlP0fRNu1LPSpSzjM787aRsswNdT5JzdVw/2pmghuQ0hyKX5nXcnm9spQuB xMLhX5e2N9o0Qewp9dUE04ql1iZ8nD6hHzkFSFbAHn5SPktz2Kcf9LKV2K9xgTd2jJI2 iskQAelZ9+PWpkpZCXRC31v7cL0+TNjnuwAxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.254.7 with SMTP id b7mr3700149ybi.293.1273253675577; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.51.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 10:34:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop support for hbase From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd34dfa0ab4c204860479f9 --000e0cd34dfa0ab4c204860479f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi folks, I would like to open a discussion on how we can make HBase work well with a supported/released version of Hadoop. HBase currently ships with a hadoop jar and that hadoop jar is from hadoop 0.20 + a set of ten/twenty patches. Most of these patches are focussed on HDFS append support in hadoop 0.20. These cannot be ported back to the 0.20 branch without affecting stability of the hadoop 0.20 branch. On the other hand, it is premature for hbase deployments to use hadoop 0.21 because hadoop 0.21 is still under testing and will take some time to stabilize. My proposal is to create a new branch off the hadoop 0.20 branch and name it branch-0.20-hbase. It will have support for append/sync and will be API compatible with the hadoop 0.20 branch. However, this branch will be marked "experimental" and API compatibility is subject to change. This branch will contain all of hdfs/mapreduce/core. If the community likes this idea, I will volunteer myself to be the release manager for this new branch and will propose a formal vote. comments/feedback/questions are most welcome. dhruba -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd34dfa0ab4c204860479f9-- From general-return-1498-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 17:58:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3254 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 17:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 17:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26056 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 17:58:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 17:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26000 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 17:58:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 17:58:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 17:58:30 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so933352gyf.35 for ; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.190.5 with SMTP id dg5mr155711ibb.44.1273255089593; Fri, 07 May 2010 10:58:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.160.70 with HTTP; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:57:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 10:57:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367b6be852dc9b048604cda4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367b6be852dc9b048604cda4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have a few questions about this proposal: 1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues only for bugs that also exist in trunk. 2) Do we plan to do a release off the branch, or is it meant only as a repository for sharing patches and a tree? 3) If we do a release, what version number would we give it and how would it be presented on the download/release pages? I'm certainly not against the idea, just would like to open discussion on the above points. The other alternative as I see it is to have those working on this branch do so somewhere like github - the advantages to that would be (a) it provides a more open way for non-committers to contribute, which is important since we're working closely with the HBase team on this, and (b) it doesn't add confusion to the main Hadoop jira and download pages. The disadvantage of course is that it fragments the code repository and we can't really do a release as easily. Thanks -Todd On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to open a discussion on how we can make HBase work well with a > supported/released version of Hadoop. HBase currently ships with a hadoop > jar and that hadoop jar is from hadoop 0.20 + a set of ten/twenty patches. > Most of these patches are focussed on HDFS append support in hadoop 0.20. > These cannot be ported back to the 0.20 branch without affecting stability > of the hadoop 0.20 branch. On the other hand, it is premature for hbase > deployments to use hadoop 0.21 because hadoop 0.21 is still under testing > and will take some time to stabilize. > > My proposal is to create a new branch off the hadoop 0.20 branch and name > it branch-0.20-hbase. It will have support for append/sync and will be API > compatible with the hadoop 0.20 branch. However, this branch will be marked > "experimental" and API compatibility is subject to change. This branch will > contain all of hdfs/mapreduce/core. > > If the community likes this idea, I will volunteer myself to be the release > manager for this new branch and will propose a formal vote. > > comments/feedback/questions are most welcome. > dhruba > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016367b6be852dc9b048604cda4-- From general-return-1499-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 07 19:26:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31313 invoked from network); 7 May 2010 19:26:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 May 2010 19:26:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 48797 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 19:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48628 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2010 19:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48620 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 19:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:26:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 31282 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2010 19:26:06 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.114]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 19:26:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4BE4694D.4030808@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 12:26:05 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/07/2010 10:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > 1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and > go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been > mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues > only for bugs that also exist in trunk. I think the proposal discussed yesterday was that the release manager has the power to determine which patches are merged from trunk to his branch, to cherry pick. But for patches that are never committed to trunk but only to his branch, I think we should use normal rules. Note that, under normal rules, the release manager still has veto power over his branch. > The other alternative as I see it is to have those working > on this branch do so somewhere like github - the advantages to that would be > (a) it provides a more open way for non-committers to contribute, which is > important since we're working closely with the HBase team on this, and (b) > it doesn't add confusion to the main Hadoop jira and download pages. The > disadvantage of course is that it fragments the code repository and we can't > really do a release as easily. If the purpose of the branch is for diverse Apache contributors to share code and make Apache releases, we should keep it at Apache rather than at github. If the branch really is only intended to be used by HBase, then perhaps the branch could live under hbase, e.g., hbase/branches/hdfs-0.20 If we think it might be used by others beyond HBase, or by clusters that are used for more than just HBase, then we might keep it under HDFS. We could label it according to the feature it concerns, e.g., hdfs/branches/0.20-append, or, if we think it's a set of features of which HBase is the only consumer, then hdfs/branches/0.20-hbase might make sense. Another alternative might be to name the branch after the release manager. So this could be named hdfs/branches/0.20-dhruba. Then, when it comes time to make a release from this branch, we might name the release something different, like or 0.20.3 or somesuch. This has the potential to create a lot of fragmentation. Ultimately we depend on the PMC to control this by not voting for releases from a multitude of branches. But, prior to that, we might discourage folks from creating such branches if we think they'll unduly fragment things. The current proposal is to fragment 0.20 into two variants, hbase and vanilla. It's probable that someone might also propose a secure fragment. Three variants might be confusing. Is there any chance we could combine some of these? For example, could vanilla become secure, or could hbase become secure? Do folks think three fragments would be acceptable? If not, which would you drop or merge? We can delay final answers to such questions until a release vote, but it'd be good to have at least a general direction earlier. Doug From general-return-1500-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 08 08:58:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61778 invoked from network); 8 May 2010 08:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 May 2010 08:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 70627 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 08:58:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70382 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 08:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70374 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2010 08:58:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 08:58:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of panxiaoliang@baixing.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 08:58:47 +0000 Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so954240pwi.35 for ; Sat, 08 May 2010 01:58:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.188.37 with SMTP id q37mr688086rvp.212.1273309106239; Sat, 08 May 2010 01:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.142.1 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 01:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:58:26 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: baixing.com is looking for data warehouse talents From: =?UTF-8?B?5r2Y5pmT6Imv?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1b4f6f77b1804861160b2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1b4f6f77b1804861160b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry for bothering you. This is an advertisement, about one job opportunit= y in Shanghai, China. If you don't like it, please ignore it. Baixing.com is one start-up company invested by eBay, and it's in eBay Classified Group. We started in March 1st, 2005, and now we have a big C2C classified site with one billion page view every month, and 300 million ads. If you want to learn more, please try using it: http://www.baixing.com Why work in baixing.com? 1. We are a small team with talents a. Keep strong growth with only 1/10 of employees of competitors b. 1 million RMB revenue per employee in last year c. High pressure, Fast growth and High return 2. We also have big global company's benefit=EF=BC=89 a. We are sharing with classified experience globally, half of our employee= s have business trips to U.S. or Europe b. We have leveling and performance reviewing system, good work, good pay c. We are in Xujiahui CBD with Convenient traffic, and metrical lines 1#, 9#, 10# are nearby d. For employees who need relocate, we will pay two month's house rent fee, and after that we have allowance for house renting too e. We have free breakfast, fruit every day, and we have many kinds of sports like basketball, badminton, travel etc. Here is jobs opening: - Software Engineer=EF=BC=88Data Warehouse=EF=BC=89 --=20 =E6=99=93=E8=89=AF --000e0cd1b4f6f77b1804861160b2-- From general-return-1501-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 08 16:59:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31979 invoked from network); 8 May 2010 16:59:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 May 2010 16:59:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 86418 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 16:59:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86348 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 16:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86333 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2010 16:59:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 16:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 16:59:36 +0000 Received: from 224-162.76-83.cust.bluewin.ch ([83.76.162.224] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OAnGX-0005sp-Hj; Sat, 08 May 2010 18:52:37 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 18:59:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-4-amd64; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Doug Cutting References: <4BE4694D.4030808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BE4694D.4030808@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005081859.08029.thomas@koch.ro> I'm a little confused and concerned now that I learn that hbase uses a patches hadoop. For Debian I use plain hadoop under hbase and it seems to work in testing environments. - Are these patches necessary to run HBase? - Where can I find these patches? - Why aren't these patches included in hadoop? Are they too unstable? - If they're unstable, does this mean, HBase is unstable? Should I worry at all about these patches for the Debian packages? regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1502-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 08 17:10:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33826 invoked from network); 8 May 2010 17:10:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 May 2010 17:10:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 93117 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 17:10:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93071 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2010 17:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93057 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2010 17:10:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 17:10:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 May 2010 17:10:41 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1540029gyf.35 for ; Sat, 08 May 2010 10:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.156.75 with SMTP id v11mr1077230ibw.25.1273338620591; Sat, 08 May 2010 10:10:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.160.70 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 10:10:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201005081859.08029.thomas@koch.ro> References: <4BE4694D.4030808@apache.org> <201005081859.08029.thomas@koch.ro> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 10:10:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase To: general@hadoop.apache.org, thomas@koch.ro Cc: Doug Cutting Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450156d628bd750486184085 --0050450156d628bd750486184085 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > I'm a little confused and concerned now that I learn that hbase uses a > patches > hadoop. For Debian I use plain hadoop under hbase and it seems to work in > testing environments. > - Are these patches necessary to run HBase? > It will work unless you have failures, in which case it will lose edits. HBase relies on the "hflush" API (called "sync" in 0.20) which does not work properly in 0.20 without significant patching. Without this patch series, HBase will certainly run, but I could never recommend running it in a production environment where data loss is a show-stopper. > - Where can I find these patches? > Currently they're in various places on the JIRA - HDFS-200, HDFS-142, HDFS-826, HDFS-561, etc. I have a github branch up which contains them all applied, but I haven't tested it beyond unit tests - my testing is all happening in our CDH3 tree, and afaik Dhruba's testing is on their FB internal tree. > - Why aren't these patches included in hadoop? Are they too unstable? > Yes, the policy is not to make such significant changes in patch releases, so they would need to be voted into the 0.20 series. It's not that they're entirely unstable, it's just that the code is very tricky and still under development. The upcoming 0.21 release has a *different* implementation of Append which also hasn't been tested significantly in real life failure scenarios, but it's important that we keep the stable release stable. > - If they're unstable, does this mean, HBase is unstable? > > Again I would not say it's terribly unstable - but it's nowhere near the level of stability that Hadoop is > Should I worry at all about these patches for the Debian packages? If you expect that people might actually want to run a production HBase, they should have the patches. If you expect people to just be playing around on single node "clusters" where failures aren't an issue, best to skip. Of course, even for production usage, I wouldn't recommend running what we've got now - wait a month or two and it should be one more notch up the stability/testing scale. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0050450156d628bd750486184085-- From general-return-1503-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 05:42:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18313 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 05:42:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 05:42:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 31775 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 05:42:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31598 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 05:42:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31590 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 05:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 05:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of raovijay@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 05:42:45 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so4553534qyk.20 for ; Sat, 08 May 2010 22:42:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gOEgX6V/9uZ1J4aGEOCdhf3eRRxUXRrXx3Ny/epu4ss=; b=aW580zvayJnRGkjJW406yGWyeJmYYSnRbmfFba8QS0MfCXFcqzgxSoE48qJWsDt1tO FEqw/33zGgE+KLynGnYB5HsOsHHfPHKBmRAuG7lHJ939AQrdZKa7pH5tewTtOekysHRr 0G2cNysPU7CsI/dCYrMUNVVncSP0laIWvCgRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Tuc3501cMNiZSZBTvZoDDgzi9Dw2JDUeU6yelHjT/xrTNlnGBrlO8pSNhlCdPIzOcL GiVRpyjgRmGIn3JriAL+vbz3v0anvtqog6hkcxWaeZslFF+x3GWkFIdZdF81T0ND6F+J 3ud+CmvKrA849VLiUsBWToJ6hp4LJkIIsz5D0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.188.72 with SMTP id cz8mr1704762qcb.75.1273383744440; Sat, 08 May 2010 22:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.96.209 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 22:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 22:42:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Fundamental question From: Vijay Rao To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ecce8c00a39048622c177 --0016364ecce8c00a39048622c177 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I am just reading and understanding Hadoop and all the other components. However I have a fundamental question for which I am not getting answers in any of the online material that is out there. 1) If hadoop is used then all the slaves and other machines in the cluster need to be formatted to have HDFS file system. If so what happens to the tera bytes of data that need to be crunched? Or is the data on a different machine? 2) Everywhere it is mentioned that the main advantage of map/reduce and hadoop is that it runs on data that is available locally. So does this mean that once the file system is formatted then I have to move my terabytes of data and split them across the cluster? Thanks VJ --0016364ecce8c00a39048622c177-- From general-return-1504-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 06:45:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33397 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 06:45:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 06:45:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 57517 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 06:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57411 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 06:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57403 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 06:45:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 06:45:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.184] (HELO mail-yx0-f184.google.com) (209.85.210.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 06:45:00 +0000 Received: by yxe14 with SMTP id 14so2756yxe.5 for ; Sat, 08 May 2010 23:44:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C3+E2Rp1MDwC0JH0lpONb6Zjn8t0zrBfax6KdDhm9Eg=; b=ED5MoNGQ/j2+ksAtyIc4c8SmAPvMpCoEEEjDf5NPtDfqHPwjsURzUIjNRjQurL0S/Z vsvFGMpLshWNYQtiazZbfdIEeimTpooTLI37hSz0lAvT5lXpAgMgZuNi0Z0arZQ3Vb3k bhtTjur1CACUOLfRLYkh1TS8FvgbOUlN6geDk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=X/+BX+ezPh0xaYQpYcuOulQxTMi/7mqJYDmJTfV/eup/EBiwjY05k1TgDtyU+ZgCQZ w3cA5xy52lNBOrsetmHbf3vgvSv5gxTjVdcjlFTlgop1t3BvSAr5AcGhjOgDaTYQzcEM EY5VU9SZ79MKMQpwtAntTXV+QuNSu0d9flQUk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.239.1 with SMTP id m1mr6509505ybh.311.1273387478756; Sat, 08 May 2010 23:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.7 with HTTP; Sat, 8 May 2010 23:44:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 08:44:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fundamental question From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd25880552fca048623a069 --000e0cd25880552fca048623a069 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi VJ 1) If hadoop is used then all the slaves and other machines in the cluster > need to be formatted to have HDFS file system. If so what happens to the > tera bytes of data that need to be crunched? Or is the data on a different > machine? > You actually assign directories on the machines to be the directories Hadoop uses in the DFS. Therefore the machines can also have other data as you don't format the whole drives. So for example I have /mnt/disk1/hadoop and /mnt/disk2/hadoop on each of my Data Nodes for HDFS to use. My machines are dedicated to Hadoop so don't store other data in addition. 2) Everywhere it is mentioned that the main advantage of map/reduce and > hadoop is that it runs on data that is available locally. So does this mean > that once the file system is formatted then I have to move my terabytes of > data and split them across the cluster? > Once you copy data into HDFS which you then *might* consider removing from the local drives. I think it is more common to dedicate a cluster to Hadoop and then copy data into the DFS from external locations (e.g. it doesn't also sit on local drives in the Hadoop cluster). This is how we use it anyway. When you launch a MR job, it knows where the data chunks are located and then runs the processing on the machine in the cluster with those chunks. Remember HDFS will store redundant copies, so you might copy in a 200GB file, it gets split up and copied around the cluster and perhaps each chunk saved 3 times. Then when it needs to process, there are 3 machines with any given chunk locally stored - Hadoop will try and schedule the tasks needed to complete the job to minimise copying around and run it on a machine with the data already. Since you seem interested in the best set up for MapReduce you might get better responses on the mapreduce-user mailing list. Hope this helps, Tim > Thanks > VJ > --000e0cd25880552fca048623a069-- From general-return-1505-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 21:09:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68645 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 21:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 21:09:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 46524 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 21:09:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46446 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 21:09:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46438 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 21:09:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 21:09:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 74.125.82.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 21:08:59 +0000 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so1770484wwb.35 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.69 with SMTP id g47mr1790831wek.82.1273439317216; Sun, 09 May 2010 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.139.233 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:08:37 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: MultipleInputs in 0.20 From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65ae518254ff904862fb27e --0016e65ae518254ff904862fb27e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 By what I've learned from different sites around the web (hadoop wiki, cloudera, mail archive, etc), the MultipleInputs class that was available in 0.18-0.19 versions of hadoop, was not moved to the 0.20 new API. (so does MultipleOutputs, but that's another story) I wanted to know if there is a way around this - to use two different paths with two different input format (sequence file, text file) as sources to the same job, with a special mapper for each input type - using hadoop 0.20 API. I think that writing a new job using 0.19 API only means more trouble later, when it's officially deprecated. I saw there is a jira (MAPREDUCE-1170)open for this issue, with a patch marked as "Won't fix". If someone out there can help me with this, I will be most thankful. Cheers, -- Oded --0016e65ae518254ff904862fb27e-- From general-return-1506-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 22:06:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76230 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 22:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 22:06:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 72598 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:06:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72522 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72514 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 22:06:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:06:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:06:37 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so5517009qyk.20 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ayxvp4+g46sET8Ws7AaMdfq1L4sePdXs4Btw48oRHjU=; b=h/D1t1EI302QzIwYs79p8MxLDufuYGHJzCMG92BCWBAszppQ1SFoVO94kAv+mu7PXZ S6bNvTkgLKp5wPULryYCYq1ho5IOd83t+/6V85zKRc1fs3ULIGcC7mfhbGECDwH1ol6D MlEB1oiKryuuJKWwqhf9cS88NFRZbuRQFt7VY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=l4dsDXbQpLoJtFwCgLAnxRyC0g7OV/7VGvxybKuPKU7pQAu0UB8yDi+F5A+0ASyowP ofAoLR39UhDCBwgcpxlqDmaW9avusbOGuJ49aSDMMAZMwkqdgeKxCj+wfnJHWa9Ozgdd lcCcnAwhKdgahJo1YPp60vjCToTEM42FEEN2g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.104.93 with SMTP id n29mr1987181qao.193.1273442776234; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.220.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 15:06:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 15:06:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4940e7b41469aa5b Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > My proposal is to create a new branch off the hadoop 0.20 branch and name > it branch-0.20-hbase. It will have support for append/sync and will be API > compatible with the hadoop 0.20 branch. However, this branch will be marked > "experimental" and API compatibility is subject to change. This branch will > contain all of hdfs/mapreduce/core. > > If the community likes this idea... > I like this idea. It can be a little tough keeping up with latest state of the 0.20 "append" patch set. Having the set all applied in the one well-known place will make collaboration and discussion of the current state of 0.20 "append" the easier. Would hbase be the only party interested in such a branch? (Scribe?) St.Ack From general-return-1507-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 22:15:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77080 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 22:15:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 22:15:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 74986 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:15:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74943 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:15:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74935 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 22:15:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:15:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:15:47 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so5527153qyk.20 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=yfGpb7vU/qxmZKZyKvtZSXkRlJ5OIfN9iJdFetfg4sw=; b=PpLwB5YWnkXhOUqhfknWsOZ4AB8plsES1zE9jrZXu8+E57LiRktDiIN0DXPeHtHS4S wMXuuEy6rjTtz/4mQ35aHXoZo4JCODJ4DE2Wl8tpni9YNjO5Iy8QKb4jltcg1y5nRz7F iBeVmwSqXnONdyFKZClX2iqnmFJkU4AnfABRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=eXST14Yx81VzOpfolHP5aaJRZya4O//QAVj7JNHCyVWrYG3iEr4ElC/KdxQWvtaQPv gB74noMyTTbqPlcknLK2w1WxgUgUBP3haW/yp6KgiDsxrOny/2kZl97olOa9gg/CeZGP ERyEy4B06vw0xDo+1tmaRk0nqtc+TOYA5fXsM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.225.72 with SMTP id ir8mr2002935qcb.73.1273443326232; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.220.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 15:15:26 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7569681478dc4e99 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: >This branch will contain all of hdfs/mapreduce/core. > Should it be all of hadoop? Could it be hdfs only? St.Ack From general-return-1508-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 22:26:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80080 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 22:26:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 22:26:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 5162 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:26:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4918 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 22:26:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4909 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 22:26:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:26:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 22:26:44 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so5539323qyk.20 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6cmyvfMC5OsVaZmHLoh36wy5j1SynxpF2ceKaRcR1ns=; b=xLx40RSgJ/IIra9FXhgU09yTOU1Vj5UTZHsFrdvnEcBXNSonjCvm86RmJYDXswCclk AYvge1qgrA7vkvJtSgc+iO/kwFbaXlHb7YLpJ9W045EMWrPqSw7+C/ly/r5Kd1mr9azr rUmRauk0T+s80x0RO5QoaPkwOuddeUZNbfTuI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=k1DLigdabJTT911uVpzDEP4R8gt6Qoodz4joe1VIPdsApSKhLfCskk17saHKtzGCXI KMp+vOfst57HwT41eZgLOC5Mi5nUpuAzv4cnKm3wQTfpsqTt+QGNmXSeexym/xncqMHn nCRPpVOBWKzrJddioTqJ7adSFMxlLQ+EG5UW8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.227.10 with SMTP id iy10mr2478716qcb.48.1273443983808; Sun, 09 May 2010 15:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.220.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 15:26:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 15:26:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c085420475694e1e Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Stack wrote: > Should it be all of hadoop? =A0Could it be hdfs only? > Please ignore the above question (I just took a look at 0.20 repo). St.Ack From general-return-1509-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 09 23:50:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91539 invoked from network); 9 May 2010 23:50:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 May 2010 23:50:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 61829 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 23:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61783 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2010 23:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61775 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2010 23:50:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 23:50:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 May 2010 23:50:33 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so5639003qyk.20 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 16:50:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ca9GhK33KSfNF/kUCMkkiDxdjedvYL5+44dP5o2wms8=; b=sz8EO4R5+FOC5mPq7fzd6BfFLI5t7Z7uYyPDu2YPZraF0Ue28t5ArY9ab/sMl09M1F 7+Exsl1hKNfL78tAwN1/N5izEltrgr7fD4aKIzBGfWUruI6QoihOSgmhqQbUuNfg/YjC sC1R9qfxMpojvq4drxLlYO1GO2iCH67+npZjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=btKHcI8zC9vCn4vlUg+uYGkMNYC15nRTocqUES7uD6slsVKEtH+OUV3CHMjTTAHQpb q2He8TAOkix7Lyr2pBkRKF3H6tiq4aayVNxP9k6Jx+XwNGivgy0nPdOB4LUbMATOHkCf Hn7qVnAAD/h2NrkNwiI1/y1PTJ59MDXGs6+ds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.43.197 with SMTP id x5mr2042732qae.127.1273449011987; Sun, 09 May 2010 16:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.2.13 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:50:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 16:50:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MultipleInputs in 0.20 From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88d3c2ffd4b0048631f378 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f88d3c2ffd4b0048631f378 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Please refer to MAPREDUCE-1743. Other option is to duplicate MultipleInputs, DelegatingInputFormat classes and slightly modify TaggedInputSplit (as I suggested earlier). This way you use your own (functional) version :-) On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Oded Rosen wrote: > By what I've learned from different sites around the web (hadoop wiki, > cloudera< > http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/05/what%E2%80%99s-new-in-hadoop-core-020/ > >, > mail archive, etc), > the MultipleInputs class that was available in 0.18-0.19 versions of > hadoop, > was not moved to the 0.20 new API. > (so does MultipleOutputs, but that's another story) > > I wanted to know if there is a way around this - to use two different paths > with two different input format (sequence file, text file) as sources to > the > same job, > with a special mapper for each input type - using hadoop 0.20 API. I think > that writing a new job using 0.19 API only means more trouble later, when > it's officially deprecated. > > I saw there is a jira > (MAPREDUCE-1170)open > for this issue, with a patch marked as "Won't fix". > If someone out there can help me with this, I will be most thankful. > > Cheers, > -- > Oded > --00c09f88d3c2ffd4b0048631f378-- From general-return-1510-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 04:39:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20598 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 04:39:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 04:39:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 64246 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 04:39:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63899 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 04:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63891 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 04:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 04:39:49 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas03.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.219]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o4A4cnZE005249 for ; Sun, 9 May 2010 21:39:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=Igm9HqaNHHsLLBEEIFtnvsgKDZxoXfSmk6LnrQ1nek1jZrLzb7ubqWb07OQn6ebm Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.219]) with mapi; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:08:59 +0530 From: Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:09:04 +0530 Subject: Re: MultipleInputs in 0.20 Thread-Topic: MultipleInputs in 0.20 Thread-Index: Acrvu+0qqD52JvunR/CsV+32kgAZZQAPsrBZ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C80D8BC0160C5amarsriyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C80D8BC0160C5amarsriyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MultipleInputs is ported new api in branch 0.21 through https://issues.apac= he.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-369 -Amareshwari On 5/10/10 2:38 AM, "Oded Rosen" wrote: By what I've learned from different sites around the web (hadoop wiki, cloudera, mail archive, etc), the MultipleInputs class that was available in 0.18-0.19 versions of hadoop= , was not moved to the 0.20 new API. (so does MultipleOutputs, but that's another story) I wanted to know if there is a way around this - to use two different paths with two different input format (sequence file, text file) as sources to th= e same job, with a special mapper for each input type - using hadoop 0.20 API. I think that writing a new job using 0.19 API only means more trouble later, when it's officially deprecated. I saw there is a jira (MAPREDUCE-1170)open for this issue, with a patch marked as "Won't fix". If someone out there can help me with this, I will be most thankful. Cheers, -- Oded --_000_C80D8BC0160C5amarsriyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1511-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 04:51:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21428 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 04:51:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 04:51:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 66701 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 04:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66630 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 04:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66622 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 04:51:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 04:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 04:51:02 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so2279327ywh.2 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 21:50:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w7Tqd/W3UEvIlet4XF7zMSjxYD+Knj+AOiqWtjD5TCQ=; b=q6o2/wH9+kiUZZwuMgor0CEWniUJxe79T0/Ox+6+7jSzizI92gWjELVaSuFOA9L2Ao qMjP8gUXc+Tnmwid0lqu5rYAcjYdi54r3pahylNERcD6lQ8iQAmVtUWzBN5BuAIj/BDG d92s+Rrad9FB/QATPtwi4yeXVn1O+OLioiV+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=X0Umr0uXIdp4bsEKs9XLYP2igSBEGuEFlNunkwzntCrdKW+ADbCPJ2qChCX1SuSh1g LzgssMpoxrM6aVxJXMcYdnf05Cr7XnE8NHEtNGWvbeh+Wyko9bHuzooYBSzI1GfCUpe+ FvzL5y7WeyuaZCGo+AtqXf62bWdSKQZ/I/zhY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.118.26 with SMTP id q26mr7703623ybc.325.1273467041731; Sun, 09 May 2010 21:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.51.3 with HTTP; Sun, 9 May 2010 21:50:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 21:50:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd70ecea7d4c3048636267b --000e0cd70ecea7d4c3048636267b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I will try to explain my opinion on some of the questions being raised so far. Of course all these are open for discussion and nothing is final at this moment. 1. This code base is primarily targeted for usage by HBase and Scribe. Both of these are Apache open source projects. 2. Accordingly, my proposal is to name the branch hadoop-0.20-append. This name is more generic than the earlier one I suggested. 3. The proposal to pull patches into this branch will follow normal conventions that we follow in Hadoop. However, the release manager would have an option to veto a patch from being pulled into the branch. 4. if this type of branching causes too many forks of core Hadoop, then we can aim to merge some of them after some time. The time duration depends on the stability of the code in that particular branch and is difficult to predict. The PMC, of course, has to approve of any new branch; so, in effect can prevent undesired multiple forks if that becomes a problem in the future. 5. code changes to this new branch will go through the normal process via JIRAs, code reviews, unit tests, etc. 6. the goal is to have a standard hadoop release from this branch at some future point. if course, such a release has to be approved by the PMC. The release could be marked as "experimental" or some such thing if deemed appropriate by the PMC. thanks, dhruba On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Stack wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Stack wrote: > > Should it be all of hadoop? Could it be hdfs only? > > > > Please ignore the above question (I just took a look at 0.20 repo). > St.Ack > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd70ecea7d4c3048636267b-- From general-return-1512-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 14:07:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49651 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 14:07:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 14:07:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 58364 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 14:07:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58305 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 14:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58297 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 14:07:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:07:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of corneliutudor.vlad@ens-lyon.fr designates 140.77.51.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [140.77.51.2] (HELO jabiru.ens-lyon.fr) (140.77.51.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:07:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27481EB1B2 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.1 (20080629) (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr Received: from jabiru.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jabiru.ens-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzowde50vedi for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr (agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.51.15]) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39311EB1B3 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id D76DF58209; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-13-143.lip.ens-lyon.fr (dhcp-13-143.lip.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.13.143]) by webmail.ens-lyon.fr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20100510160724.137264ztyvvvcie4@webmail.ens-lyon.fr> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:07:24 +0200 From: Corneliu-Tudor Vlad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Problem with Hadoop Streaming and -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1.4) Hello I am a new user of Hadoop and I have some trouble using Hadoop Streaming and the "-D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum" option. I'm experimenting with an unmanaged application (C++) which I want to run over several nodes in 2 scenarious 1) the number of maps (input splits) is equal to the number of nodes 2) the number of maps is a multiple of the number of nodes (5, 10, 20, ... Initially, when running the tests in scenario 1 I would sometimes get 2 process/node on half the nodes. However I fixed this by adding the directive -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=1, so everything works fine. In the case of scenario 2 (more maps than nodes) this directive no longer works, always obtaining 2 processes/node. I tested the even with putting maximum=5 and I still get 2 processes/node. The entire command I use is: /usr/bin/time --format="-duration:\t%e |\t-MFaults:\t%F |\t-ContxtSwitch:\t%w" \ /opt/hadoop/bin/hadoop jar /opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.2-streaming.jar \ -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=1 \ -D mapred.map.tasks=30 \ -D mapred.reduce.tasks=0 \ -D io.file.buffer.size=5242880 \ -libjars "/opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-7debug.jar" \ -input input/test553short \ -output out1 \ -mapper "/opt/jobdata/script_1k" \ -inputformat "me.MyInputFormat" I'm using is Debian Lenny x64, and Hadoop 0.20.2. My question is: why is this happening and how can I make it work properly (i.e. be able to limit exactly how many mappers I can have at 1 time per node) Thank you in advance, T From general-return-1513-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 16:50:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22545 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 16:50:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 16:50:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 2644 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:50:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2576 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:50:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2568 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 16:50:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:50:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:50:10 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so2655587gyf.35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Aws75sL7oqXltToBWXs8ma785TXlD+2agQgndLjr9iU=; b=YwnLMgqKzxfYqpqeQPScJr1NO2Txs8yrjCBef+IKAYG7nuwAJ+hj4/iQAY/lZobzJR kNwe2W0KfgSSKj36jxzBrhkq5gqxN1zhKscRbcA+J4rHKYvx7/kGqydj4SrjT6fPAhaI q/svDFFtf/WME+yGzX4qb14+nHqor2H+zaS1U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=CemoopX9m5YMiYRpHJdIfAj37jpERE2/sj5xoUg6vO4szRtctTjIPf8JYdFR5VmK9Z 3TcnyVwwLKMiVT7rPABlbZ+GpvK+yfJKDg7OjHKLIUeOQTILXS2g/8xeakK3x1tKIbiX wSZnXIzWIYqEELHXffxuRreV6PgLzPKxpIysU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.187.208 with SMTP id cx16mr3641776qcb.66.1273510189035; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.186.193 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:49:48 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rKqBTOXjKaD_dR_fATp7vDiE9rY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 on the below. St.Ack On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > I will try to explain my opinion on some of the questions being raised so > far. Of course all these are open for discussion and nothing is final at > this moment. > > 1. This code base is primarily targeted for usage by HBase and Scribe. Bo= th > of these are Apache open source projects. > 2. Accordingly, my proposal is to name the branch hadoop-0.20-append. Thi= s > name is more generic than the earlier one I suggested. > 3. The proposal to pull patches into this branch will follow normal > conventions that we follow in Hadoop. However, the release manager would > have an option to veto a patch from being pulled into the branch. > 4. if this type of branching causes too many forks of core Hadoop, then w= e > can aim to merge some of them after some time. The time duration depends = on > the stability of the code in that particular branch and is difficult to > predict. The PMC, of course, has to approve of any new branch; so, in eff= ect > can prevent undesired multiple forks if that becomes a problem in the > future. > 5. code changes to this new branch will go through the normal process via > JIRAs, code reviews, unit tests, etc. > 6. the goal is to have a standard hadoop release from =A0this branch at s= ome > future point. if course, such a release has to be approved by the PMC. Th= e > release could be marked as "experimental" or some such thing if deemed > appropriate by the PMC. > > thanks, > dhruba > > > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Stack wrote: > >> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Stack wrote: >> > Should it be all of hadoop? =A0Could it be hdfs only? >> > >> >> Please ignore the above question (I just took a look at 0.20 repo). >> St.Ack >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba > From general-return-1514-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 16:59:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24267 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 16:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 16:59:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16235 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:59:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16194 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 16:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 16:59:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:59:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 16:59:13 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=GjFjGrUQa89cyrKZ8opbgoJzWoBQhOOJ5cymPKeNwFH9XyTnsaSoY+3p 87tY1wObvGUhNEloMwQL4EjTQpwUIthGvlm4y+SNqyVhImutKEb3C9RMu EJou4DzRMSx4Vbd; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1273510753; x=1305046753; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=20support=20for=20hbase|Date:=20 Mon,=2010=20May=202010=2016:58:50=20+0000|Message-ID:=20< EA6A5E07-30C9-4209-945D-413DC9F45090@linkedin.com>|To:=20 ""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quote d-printable|Content-ID:=20<87719bea-0a40-4454-a67e-be69b2 7e0bec>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D =0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=9tSnw2nKNtWTtAY65kJkiFmSjAiEq17AdpvH+G8Sjeo=; b=FVLp8C+Jrfo5vqcIa24qLYn7gHOuXNnXXxX6lqn1GDXTmDSqpRhpiuca iREdx6LtjoZ8xuDYxxLk2tyfQrICpb0KRkgX1/PBHY7brO7uvSLL/96FC UUNdjexWn17S/5i; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,363,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12796618" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 09:58:52 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:58:51 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:58:51 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Topic: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Index: AQHK7gugwCsp8tpMpUe2iaMIChehi5JKI4EAgAADD4CAAGtggIAAy3EA Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:58:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <87719bea-0a40-4454-a67e-be69b27e0bec> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 16:58:52.0413 (UTC) FILETIME=[1179B2D0:01CAF062] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Let me understand this: a) the hbase folks have been required to patch hadoop due to bugs b) they have been doing this for X months now c) we finally have momentum on getting 0.21 out the door d) hey, let's make their life easier and take resources out of 0.21 by crea= ting a branch Are we willing to create a branch for everyone that asks? What happens if m= ahout/lucene/solr/joes-random-application asks? Is it a good idea to creat= e a branch that hopefully has a very short life time? Is it the latest fa= shion amongst the PMC to request random branches? =20 trunk 0.21 0.20 0.20-append 0.20-security-sure-hope-this-turns-into-1.0 0.20-lifecycle-management-stuff-that-seems-to-never-get-committed ... I'm not PMC, but can I make requests too, since I have to patch what we use= ? 0.20-capacity-scheduler-is-broken-but-we-shipped-it-anyway 0.20-stop-using-bsd-and-gnu-only-extensions-during-forks 0.20-hadoop-devs-cant-spell I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0.21 = out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year bra= nch. This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group.= From general-return-1515-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 17:18:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28266 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 17:18:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 17:18:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 41160 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:18:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41121 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:18:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41113 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 17:18:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:18:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:18:48 +0000 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so134174vws.35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:18:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dWqCKwCwLYrqa8RznWn4MHeycft6i7LcPc79IS9iJrM=; b=PRbErV0ixlN1ZRg/YUUgJlYItHGyhZcqt5zrwDSzf5IQPq7hwodE5LVQEUnF195fHu PKx5qzNMo5MhB+qiYCq3ahjmMW3BaooM20DMMo8U9eW1PLWr0SVsQ7yOUep2ekg3N1nk jMNg/wYMwKd+w9v48hWfqyPt6KrWUtO2hDC/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RsTmwQIe3eiXA/MLYM3RRaI2aigDRGwWJ+unsXsgnXSpKFQSDNv/NojWnCbBGXMMLR 11y+DTy9WKImQGheIKktjt2Xo7oFxPrpeKs1akGagtF+o+Z23nbuPPt3EuClpjjXJNTX c4JgVO7KhHk9brQ/dhUiFXg9FXwcfQereBAZY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.237.142 with SMTP id ko14mr3738845qcb.11.1273511906896; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.186.193 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:18:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:18:26 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MmTMxcw96oOXc7an_5W4DelnlYA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > Let me understand this: > > a) the hbase folks have been required to patch hadoop due to bugs The branch is to work on adding a feature to 0.20, not for fixing bugs. > c) we finally have momentum on getting 0.21 out the door > d) hey, let's make their life easier and take resources out of 0.21 by cr= eating a branch > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). > Are we willing to create a branch for everyone that asks? What happens if= mahout/lucene/solr/joes-random-application asks? =A0Is it a good idea to c= reate a branch that hopefully has a very short life time? =A0 Is it the lat= est fashion amongst the PMC to request random branches? > > trunk > 0.21 > 0.20 > 0.20-append > 0.20-security-sure-hope-this-turns-into-1.0 > 0.20-lifecycle-management-stuff-that-seems-to-never-get-committed > ... > > I'm not PMC, but can I make requests too, since I have to patch what we u= se? > Of course you can. > I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0.2= 1 out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year b= ranch. =A0This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group. We're all behind 0.21. Its the future. St.Ack From general-return-1516-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 17:25:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29343 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 17:25:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 17:25:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 47548 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47507 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47499 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 17:25:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:25:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:24:56 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=G80RwZi35dPlgi67DxFpRq62ekFRKbWP/TkF8FgMbj0vwWwKEihIiVFh udxcs64RghsSORg1QkNoHuy25xjLSVNb4YwFxD6kJ/gsPTanFvnvSR18j 0vfr8z+5WB5abtJ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1273512296; x=1305048296; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=20support=20for=20hbase|Date:=20 Mon,=2010=20May=202010=2017:24:32=20+0000|Message-ID:=20< 7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com>|To:=20 ""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quote d-printable|Content-ID:=20<70802053-c141-4ee0-a4d1-e89e8a 0f8e32>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D=0A =20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20; bh=zhREF71k/NUzgjEa467g/g0zbB0RZITHd7ORHO4+jlc=; b=OUeCBVWjD+yc2QyYiZJOMNv7+V5UgvXU9iHcruKDYagCqdtqyaBd5pmb 4OdkQMsYd3d7LgSimePJr508Qa6Ng07TxA/Cn05yVUsPow8Zq6nRsCs9P MQlYUgeFmYI1MNi; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,363,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12797401" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:35 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:34 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:24:34 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Topic: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Index: AQHK7gugwCsp8tpMpUe2iaMIChehi5JKI4EAgAADD4CAAGtggIAAy3EAgAAFegCAAAG0AA== Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:24:32 +0000 Message-ID: <7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <70802053-c141-4ee0-a4d1-e89e8a0f8e32> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 17:24:35.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8EDCB80:01CAF065] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 10, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote: > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). There are X amount of hours that people can put into Hadoop. If Y amount g= oes into 0.20-append, then 0.21 is now left with X-Y. X-Y < X. >> I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0.= 21 out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year = branch. This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group. >=20 > We're all behind 0.21. Its the future. Great. Start using the time you'd put into 0.20-append into 0.21 and then = we'll all be in a better place. From general-return-1517-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 17:46:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37564 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 17:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 17:46:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 84424 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:46:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84381 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 17:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84373 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 17:46:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:46:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 17:45:55 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1097890gwj.35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.79.201 with SMTP id q9mr232377ibk.9.1273513534383; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.160.70 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> >> Let me understand this: >> >> a) the hbase folks have been required to patch hadoop due to bugs > > The branch is to work on adding a feature to 0.20, not for fixing bugs. > >> c) we finally have momentum on getting 0.21 out the door >> d) hey, let's make their life easier and take resources out of 0.21 by c= reating a branch >> > > The above is a fallacious setup. =A0How does a branch in 0.20 detract > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). For what it's worth, though, the majority of the size of the 0.20 append patch is made up of additional unit tests. I have started forward-porting these new tests to the trunk append and it's already exposed a number of bugs. So while it's tempting to say that the 0.20 append is "wasted effort", it really is benefiting the entire community and the 0.21 release as well. -Todd > > >> Are we willing to create a branch for everyone that asks? What happens i= f mahout/lucene/solr/joes-random-application asks? =A0Is it a good idea to = create a branch that hopefully has a very short life time? =A0 Is it the la= test fashion amongst the PMC to request random branches? >> >> trunk >> 0.21 >> 0.20 >> 0.20-append >> 0.20-security-sure-hope-this-turns-into-1.0 >> 0.20-lifecycle-management-stuff-that-seems-to-never-get-committed >> ... >> >> I'm not PMC, but can I make requests too, since I have to patch what we = use? >> > > Of course you can. > >> I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0.= 21 out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year = branch. =A0This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group. > > We're all behind 0.21. =A0Its the future. > > St.Ack > --=20 Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera From general-return-1518-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 18:05:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44107 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 18:05:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 18:05:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8845 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 18:05:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8802 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 18:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8794 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 18:05:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ryanobjc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:05:47 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so1898234pxi.35 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:05:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xbgw2d34J+ek4e4DtN8DlVOTH5I3LDn2KJ7Rjhkrgkg=; b=utagEOIsepJtROAiowhqFlOalRDm9g9q7SeEdGOzlmxZongGLHFpPqCWFLsZUEassS P+EcVLai0bHtHQVk2+vLYjbY4mOyEQQZ7KE40zo0FtTuQwkbTjwEJf1h8WbD3mU1Q2X6 o7xkvisXmq4aUB0gMURMNXU7vgVYHVgyg6qcc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K3lsc9BvXVzSp4gS4olkYBwY0zPBH5ydyuNuenY/OYv9KJX9OHL9KFHlEX6NrpNWev 9G1CaMQT4qOF4PQfgHsZjJrRkxKdf4MyqJyR2zImV3QiqjS0K5//GE9Ip/k8X/T2sgph 6YNsTMapuQefB9XcXTlOlC0238yBcGH5QsF1E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.57.8 with SMTP id f8mr2936381rva.102.1273514724003; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.147.19 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:05:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com> References: <7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:05:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Ryan Rawson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > On May 10, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote: >> The above is a fallacious setup. =A0How does a branch in 0.20 detract >> from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 >> branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). > > There are X amount of hours that people can put into Hadoop. =A0If Y amou= nt goes into 0.20-append, then 0.21 is now left with X-Y. =A0 X-Y < X. > >>> I'd rather have the HBase folks put pressure on the Hadoop PMC to get 0= .21 out the door than create a custom-to-be-thrown-away-in-less-than-a-year= branch. =A0This way we *all* benefit rather than a select, but vocal group= . >> >> We're all behind 0.21. =A0Its the future. > > Great. =A0Start using the time you'd put into 0.20-append into 0.21 and t= hen we'll all be in a better place. That's not how it works though - people have adopted and use Hadoop 0.20 because of the fact that people like Yahoo, Facebook, etc run it on multi-thousand node clusters and have done so for months (or soon to be years now). From general-return-1519-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 18:14:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45857 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 18:14:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 18:14:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 18738 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 18:14:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18698 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 18:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18690 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 18:14:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:14:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:14:31 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Return-Path:X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=UA57iSNejdmfOz+eAH1i4a32enh1HpBEcQDyGsp0PPGsRKtD6ODnwBzM a/x3aaKJ4NpD2tF6RT7eFT9b5mhuisUCsl5QRAKkX25gxrstpRYzuGC7H sdbGJn4ruAI0JJ/; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1273515271; x=1305051271; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=20support=20for=20hbase|Date:=20 Mon,=2010=20May=202010=2018:14:07=20+0000|Message-ID:=20< 5DED5EE4-6B01-4798-8F78-16F54E2AAD51@linkedin.com>|To:=20 ""=20|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quote d-printable|Content-ID:=20<5715a309-14d5-42da-b317-e598b3 5c11ab>|In-Reply-To:=20|References:=20=0D =0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=20 =0D=0A=20<7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linke din.com>=0D=0A=20; bh=fWDi7+QThzQ6wTPhWAAXQSLzHH1lSYHvd7X2wUhQzTI=; b=dDe3c83RNpoKH4+ignbLHGL6+hosZ5H/o1slmWKRKrw14hpIS10HxfHz +dUMZZrbfoXYg/385lRMnmiFFV3OJzx5M12yE9WI4pmroCMIFcvHnFHUL +ayTXyVbT8Y2Bmj; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,363,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="12798792" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:09 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:09 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:14:09 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "" Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Topic: Hadoop support for hbase Thread-Index: AQHK7gugwCsp8tpMpUe2iaMIChehi5JKI4EAgAADD4CAAGtggIAAy3EAgAAFegCAAAG0AIAAC2qAgAACcYA= Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:14:07 +0000 Message-ID: <5DED5EE4-6B01-4798-8F78-16F54E2AAD51@linkedin.com> References: <7638AF7B-1C16-45C1-A9CE-025572A7E067@linkedin.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5715a309-14d5-42da-b317-e598b35c11ab> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 18:14:09.0995 (UTC) FILETIME=[962A01B0:01CAF06C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 10, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > That's not how it works though - people have adopted and use Hadoop > 0.20 because of the fact that people like Yahoo, Facebook, etc run it > on multi-thousand node clusters and have done so for months (or soon > to be years now). If you look through Yahoo!'s changelog, it is hard to call that 0.20. From general-return-1520-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 20:21:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82555 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 20:21:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 20:21:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 77329 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 20:21:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77281 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 20:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77273 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 20:21:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:21:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of michael_segel@hotmail.com designates 65.55.34.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.34.19] (HELO col0-omc1-s9.col0.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 20:21:49 +0000 Received: from COL117-W64 ([65.55.34.9]) by col0-omc1-s9.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 10 May 2010 13:21:28 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_cae9d3bd-57c3-4ac6-b7c8-c3470d634f8e_" X-Originating-IP: [65.167.11.254] From: Michael Segel To: Subject: RE: Hadoop support for hbase Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:21:28 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,,,, , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2010 20:21:28.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F0FFFB0:01CAF07E] --_cae9d3bd-57c3-4ac6-b7c8-c3470d634f8e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > From: todd@cloudera.com > Date: Mon=2C 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 > Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase > To: general@hadoop.apache.org >=20 > > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract > > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 > > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). >=20 > For what it's worth=2C though=2C the majority of the size of the 0.20 > append patch is made up of additional unit tests. I have started > forward-porting these new tests to the trunk append and it's already > exposed a number of bugs. So while it's tempting to say that the 0.20 > append is "wasted effort"=2C it really is benefiting the entire > community and the 0.21 release as well. >=20 > -Todd >=20 Sometimes you have to slow down to go faster. =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your = inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2= --_cae9d3bd-57c3-4ac6-b7c8-c3470d634f8e_-- From general-return-1521-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 10 21:06:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12211 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 21:06:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 21:06:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 33145 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 21:06:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33103 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 21:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33095 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 21:06:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 21:06:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 21:06:30 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so1636133gxk.11 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZQdwlNcrVL6kWMRgdOrPJTx1JEWoRdCn+WVVS7PsEyY=; b=agJ9jqGPuq9wChZtCwtD6S6vtYqT3/tfqX/TE/vvDqyYTxhfL7AlHv2T9pD9xuoWp5 CcTXdt7dIsfKxO9M3im/oM+s28b7BpooIHW4NFDQ31rJ4eM+TIH61wCFb54JFu6BRCoX mDbEMzPXMvn571tZ7AezK5qvTfQKKV5M2KjpQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l5SO6zJLaC3wQqXDnv+OWTssrM6NNnsxozKbxdpuWDdWdB+7khywshcj0I6uUo5Mgw ysbpftqawnSWwYL4SLBo+h3kJJsgcQlR7T+TktbefV9daFGJRuSgFOwss2AW5qMsdgHO tjB6yGGAJ5gjyuBObomkrj3yYEQYXGZzyITtc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.245.40 with SMTP id s40mr735211anh.137.1273525569422; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.141.16 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:06:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Given that the 0.20-append branch pretty much already exists unofficially, via IRC, IM and email forwarded patchsets, it seems like giving it an official home is just recognizing the status quo. Especially since 0.21 probably won't be getting rolled out into production everywhere the first day it's officially released. If the work's going on anyways, I don't see how giving people a shared home hurts matters, if anything it gives them a better shared touchpoint for forward-porting bugfixes to 0.21. A case could be made that by making it more painful to run 0.20-append, more momentum is created towards 0.21 but since Tom is already on top of 21 and seemingly doing an excellent job, and since the HBase community will probably be some of the first people to move to 0.21 anyways, I don't see why having 0.20-append will damage 0.21's momentum at this point. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Michael Segel wrote: > > > >> From: todd@cloudera.com >> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 >> Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org >> > >> > The above is a fallacious setup. =A0How does a branch in 0.20 detract >> > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 >> > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). >> >> For what it's worth, though, the majority of the size of the 0.20 >> append patch is made up of additional unit tests. I have started >> forward-porting these new tests to the trunk append and it's already >> exposed a number of bugs. So while it's tempting to say that the 0.20 >> append is "wasted effort", it really is benefiting the entire >> community and the 0.21 release as well. >> >> -Todd >> > > Sometimes you have to slow down to go faster. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from you= r inbox. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL= :ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 From general-return-1522-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 06:35:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33775 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 06:35:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 06:35:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 52668 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 06:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52397 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 06:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52389 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 06:35:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:35:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dhruba@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.216] (HELO mail-gx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.217.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:35:32 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so588966gxk.9 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 23:35:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E9R8o5NZ/mYDPeqiSasFANDHmCjQb9wHsEHHsANEDRE=; b=uuBnfJXZwSnAeiIhcs1aKykCGj2FyvMUT8iF8OAzEKVsVCDInjDZbTA8W5JnpafbWz 4ZwjykOR9QAzxVfYxmO2FmzkcBPMlSI+jUR3JKYNGXD0elz04VPpP+9fbI7wwxrBTxcX bJBDI4nBbKL8mJz3XPIQKUEBum/NUqqUm83XA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TqIYoyv5eefbRdjDCqWTssCPKeYSf/aWZczsgsaDF81o6qukQ1a+jhySViQ64ng4J2 hH/ue+4FoISShdConkOmuoMfOLu3lpMWVAvqp6/uKGW334S/ef85R3dITHLNM8fJbypW xT7NDZO4lbZU1tI/Jw1tfA4YPJA4GlFnlgOFo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.243.17 with SMTP id q17mr11630662ybh.103.1273559710659; Mon, 10 May 2010 23:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.51.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 23:35:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:35:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase From: Dhruba Borthakur To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd298602774d104864bbad9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd298602774d104864bbad9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 @Allen: we are definitely behind 0.21 release. Tom White is guiding that release and most developers are committed to removing blockers for that release. Todd rightly mentions that the work being done for 0.20 benefits 0.21 as well. @Jay: Thanks for summing it up so well. I completely agree with your viewpoint. thanks dhruba On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Jay Booth wrote: > Given that the 0.20-append branch pretty much already exists > unofficially, via IRC, IM and email forwarded patchsets, it seems like > giving it an official home is just recognizing the status quo. > Especially since 0.21 probably won't be getting rolled out into > production everywhere the first day it's officially released. If the > work's going on anyways, I don't see how giving people a shared home > hurts matters, if anything it gives them a better shared touchpoint > for forward-porting bugfixes to 0.21. > > A case could be made that by making it more painful to run > 0.20-append, more momentum is created towards 0.21 but since Tom is > already on top of 21 and seemingly doing an excellent job, and since > the HBase community will probably be some of the first people to move > to 0.21 anyways, I don't see why having 0.20-append will damage 0.21's > momentum at this point. > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Michael Segel > wrote: > > > > > > > >> From: todd@cloudera.com > >> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:45:13 -0700 > >> Subject: Re: Hadoop support for hbase > >> To: general@hadoop.apache.org > >> > > > >> > The above is a fallacious setup. How does a branch in 0.20 detract > >> > from the 0.21 momentum (The append feature that we'd work on in 0.20 > >> > branch has little relation to how append works in 0.21). > >> > >> For what it's worth, though, the majority of the size of the 0.20 > >> append patch is made up of additional unit tests. I have started > >> forward-porting these new tests to the trunk append and it's already > >> exposed a number of bugs. So while it's tempting to say that the 0.20 > >> append is "wasted effort", it really is benefiting the entire > >> community and the 0.21 release as well. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > > > > Sometimes you have to slow down to go faster. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from > your inbox. > > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba --000e0cd298602774d104864bbad9-- From general-return-1523-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 13:38:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20823 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 13:38:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 13:38:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 80198 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 13:38:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79793 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 13:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79785 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 13:38:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.172] (HELO mail-yx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.210.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:38:40 +0000 Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so2754529yxe.2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wF/zkjbgY+ESwNvfH+faradyAglz34t54TYam/8rDec=; b=IUvi9l0MjSkPmM47GJimyA7doZ9GgjuZEiFqzvIKKN9DKKNB30DYegeXwHdEdxKb9x 9EP3Tnf9e1/Aw6Ei21e4/cPLT3eeo7Ovgk8zp5zkUX1kd3Raj1/4BjreDe5L8e4OrzrL i6JPHLNresWb/uwyty+hZpeQfldtUTyI9u72Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wksEz6OCpgZfio6M+oa2bp93KPrz9FWxWKxi4HhxLoSHxLsoJPEPvkzJSvy7LashWS VwjE8Gs5kve5nqWbjkvqa3a7o9StEnHYjdYvp+n9AWPJGkuuCz8g2U+LR2UC/m7v6bu4 Sshaq6zLuwerVTtyXrdHykzIGPAmCla+D5OmM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.147.32 with SMTP id z32mr2137078ann.227.1273585098892; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.231.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:38:18 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68deb376924bd048651a3e9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68deb376924bd048651a3e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a good idea? Thanks again. Renato M. 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball > Renato, > > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, each > pass > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads those sa= me > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the last > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memory > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce job to > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. > > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write your > interim > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 and > writes > to /iteration1, etc.. > > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memory > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed key-val= ue > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate > results. > But this will require some integration work on your part. > - Aaron > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, but I = am > > getting some into some "design" problems. > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and in eac= h > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I would ne= ed > > to > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one that > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those > values, > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried to tes= t > it > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. > > Any suggestions, please??? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Renato M. > > > --0016e68deb376924bd048651a3e9-- From general-return-1524-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 13:59:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24083 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 13:59:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 13:59:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 7649 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 13:59:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7586 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 13:59:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7578 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 13:59:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:59:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.144.10.51] (HELO orcon.sify.net) (202.144.10.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:59:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by orcon.sify.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA33632A2B7 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:06 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from orcon.sify.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orcon.sify.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qVhfru64CV9e for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:06 +0530 (IST) Received: from mail1.mkhoj.com (mx.mkhoj.com [210.210.41.205]) by orcon.sify.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA3732843D for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:29:06 +0530 (IST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYFACv96EsKDmQH/2dsb2JhbACRZI04uziFEASDPg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,207,1272825000"; d="scan'208";a="668326" Received: from mk-exch-1.mkhoj.com ([10.14.100.7]) by mail1.mkhoj.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2010 19:29:04 +0530 Received: from [10.14.100.79] (10.14.100.79) by MK-EXCH-1.MKHOJ.COM (10.14.100.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:22:49 +0530 Message-ID: <4BE96263.8040102@inmobi.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:27:55 +0530 From: Rohan Rai User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: JVM Reuse for parallel execution Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Is there a way of executing multiple tasks in parallel in a single JVM. For a particular job we see a child process being spawned for each task, despite mapred.job.reuse.jvm.num.tasks being set to -1 In order to avoid the overhead of starting a JVM for each task and yet achieve parallel execution of tasks, wanted to know sharing the JVM is possible, fo= r parallel task execution. Regards Rohan The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the = use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authoriz= ed to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged informa= tion. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that an= y disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the= contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. I= f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediate= ly by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. The fir= m is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the informa= tion contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. From general-return-1525-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 14:04:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25693 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 14:04:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 14:04:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11262 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 14:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11027 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 14:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11018 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 14:04:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:04:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [202.144.10.51] (HELO orcon.sify.net) (202.144.10.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:04:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by orcon.sify.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310BA32A2F2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:01 +0530 (IST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from orcon.sify.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orcon.sify.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLFMxxhylBol for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:01 +0530 (IST) Received: from mail1.mkhoj.com (mx.mkhoj.com [210.210.41.205]) by orcon.sify.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D722032A2AE for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:34:00 +0530 (IST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEACv96EsKDmQH/2dsb2JhbACfHLs4hRAEgz4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,207,1272825000"; d="scan'208";a="668345" Received: from mk-exch-1.mkhoj.com ([10.14.100.7]) by mail1.mkhoj.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2010 19:33:59 +0530 Received: from [10.14.100.79] (10.14.100.79) by MK-EXCH-1.MKHOJ.COM (10.14.100.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:27:44 +0530 Message-ID: <4BE9638A.5070409@inmobi.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:32:50 +0530 From: Rohan Rai User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rohan Rai CC: Subject: Re: JVM Reuse for parallel execution References: <4BE96263.8040102@inmobi.com> In-Reply-To: <4BE96263.8040102@inmobi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Forgot to add, we are using the following configuration. mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum as 4 and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum as 3. Regards Rohan Rohan Rai wrote: > Hi > > Is there a way of executing multiple tasks in parallel in a single JVM. > > For a particular job we see a child process being spawned for each > task, despite > mapred.job.reuse.jvm.num.tasks being set to -1 > > In order to avoid the overhead of starting a JVM for each task and yet > achieve > parallel execution of tasks, wanted to know sharing the JVM is > possible, for > parallel task execution. > > Regards > Rohan > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the = use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authoriz= ed to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged informa= tion. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that an= y disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the= contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. I= f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediate= ly by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. The fir= m is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the informa= tion contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. From general-return-1526-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 14:23:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30781 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 14:23:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 14:23:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 45733 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 14:23:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45695 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 14:23:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45687 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 14:23:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:23:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of timrobertson100@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 14:23:36 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so3604299ywh.2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QujxtGR10k6nuJXY9GXywoa4hwXMIhJM7jZVLV8fSlQ=; b=gXCcfZWIRCAES6ss6p4req7pRQDHn3/JiTLWagHXkV5nC4kelx/5zAYw2jWKeUs3b3 7vUz/vJ62RakxBdLy1omnt46e8JZ+w+qZp/+7hMKSvJiKoTCMaA+dCGo9xbp0HtyYWBC wPFsEgT9I9aXsLGb4f1Vb4eDZktC9qR5XaFt8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=m3JZN+dwQi7RIvAprLN4eW4vH+QOM32ixmtKI5aJezriRO7x4v8jZlsy1hoeuFZAwy cCKGpIRRinBwT2LL7/24TP/c0/wVUvAef0uH3rJqeXGmwCxBv/FC9L/zmuqEGpVg0zjb f9N4s9i3r94Bwd2CtdW35oZKsC0ABQ+dKIntk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.29.9 with SMTP id g9mr10858792ybj.46.1273587794978; Tue, 11 May 2010 07:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.7 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 07:23:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BE9638A.5070409@inmobi.com> References: <4BE96263.8040102@inmobi.com> <4BE9638A.5070409@inmobi.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:23:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JVM Reuse for parallel execution From: Tim Robertson To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd25d101c3df0048652445f --000e0cd25d101c3df0048652445f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/mapred_tutorial.html#Task+JVM+Reuse? (Just so you know - there is a mapreduce users mailing list for MR specific questions) Hope this helps, Tim On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Rohan Rai wrote: > Forgot to add, we are using the following configuration. > > mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum as 4 > and mapred.tasktracker.reduce.tasks.maximum as 3. > > Regards > Rohan > > > > Rohan Rai wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Is there a way of executing multiple tasks in parallel in a single JVM. >> >> For a particular job we see a child process being spawned for each >> task, despite >> mapred.job.reuse.jvm.num.tasks being set to -1 >> >> In order to avoid the overhead of starting a JVM for each task and yet >> achieve >> parallel execution of tasks, wanted to know sharing the JVM is >> possible, for >> parallel task execution. >> >> Regards >> Rohan >> >> > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. > The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt. > --000e0cd25d101c3df0048652445f-- From general-return-1527-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 17:00:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76249 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 17:00:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 17:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 43526 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:00:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43482 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:00:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43474 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 17:00:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:00:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:00:21 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so31294wwb.38 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 09:59:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.168.71 with SMTP id j49mr3139915wel.175.1273597198903; Tue, 11 May 2010 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.181.82 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100510160724.137264ztyvvvcie4@webmail.ens-lyon.fr> References: <20100510160724.137264ztyvvvcie4@webmail.ens-lyon.fr> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with Hadoop Streaming and -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum option From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The short answer is that with Hadoop, you generally do not decide the exact number of map tasks that are spawned. The number of map tasks spawned is usually a function of the number of blocks in the input data set. Task trackers are configured with a number of slots for map and reduce tasks. Tasks are assigned to slots on task trackers. By default, task trackers have 2 map slots and 2 reduce slots per task tracker. The manner with which Hadoop assigns tasks to task trackers is based on a number of factors. You can attempt to control parallelization at a micro level (as you're doing) but it's generally a bad idea. Not only are you not taking full advantage of your cluster, but you are not taking advantage of what Hadoop is actually good at. In fact, it may not be possible to control it exactly as you wish. Is there a reason why you need to control things so strictly? Do you need exactly a multiple of the number of nodes, or an approximation thereof? What is the rationale for wanting to run only one task per node? On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Corneliu-Tudor Vlad wrote: > > Hello > > I am a new user of Hadoop and I have some trouble using Hadoop Streaming = and > the "-D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum" option. > > I'm experimenting with an unmanaged application (C++) which I want to run > over several nodes in 2 scenarious > 1) the number of maps (input splits) is equal to the number of nodes > 2) the number of maps is a multiple of the number of nodes (5, 10, 20, ..= . > > Initially, when running the tests in scenario 1 I would sometimes get 2 > process/node on half the nodes. However I fixed this by adding the direct= ive > -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=3D1, so everything works fine. > > In the case of scenario 2 (more maps than nodes) this directive no longer > works, always obtaining 2 processes/node. I tested the even with putting > maximum=3D5 and I still get 2 processes/node. > > The entire command I use is: > > /usr/bin/time --format=3D"-duration:\t%e |\t-MFaults:\t%F > |\t-ContxtSwitch:\t%w" \ > =A0/opt/hadoop/bin/hadoop jar > /opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.2-streaming.jar \ > =A0-D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=3D1 \ > =A0-D mapred.map.tasks=3D30 \ > =A0-D mapred.reduce.tasks=3D0 \ > =A0-D io.file.buffer.size=3D5242880 \ > =A0-libjars "/opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-7debug.jar" \ > =A0-input input/test553short \ > =A0-output out1 \ > =A0-mapper "/opt/jobdata/script_1k" \ > =A0-inputformat "me.MyInputFormat" > > I'm using is Debian Lenny x64, and Hadoop 0.20.2. > > My question is: why is this happening and how can I make it work properly > (i.e. be able to limit exactly how many mappers I can have at 1 time per > node) > > Thank you in advance, > T > > --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1528-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 17:32:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85596 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 17:32:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 17:32:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 93485 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:32:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93222 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:32:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93214 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 17:32:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:32:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:31:56 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so122641pwi.35 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.22.19 with SMTP id z19mr3963708rvi.250.1273599096185; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.169.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:31:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1821cb6e5cd048654e526 --000e0cd1821cb6e5cd048654e526 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What objects are you referring to? I'm not sure I understand your question. - Aaron On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. > Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a good idea= ? > Thanks again. > > Renato M. > > > 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball > > > Renato, > > > > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, each > > pass > > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads those > same > > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the last > > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memory > > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce job = to > > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. > > > > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write your > > interim > > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 and > > writes > > to /iteration1, etc.. > > > > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memory > > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed > key-value > > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate > > results. > > But this will require some integration work on your part. > > - Aaron > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, but = I > am > > > getting some into some "design" problems. > > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and in > each > > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I would > need > > > to > > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one that > > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those > > values, > > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried to > test > > it > > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. > > > Any suggestions, please??? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > > Renato M. > > > > > > --000e0cd1821cb6e5cd048654e526-- From general-return-1529-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 17:43:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88389 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 17:43:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 17:43:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 6964 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6922 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 17:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6914 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 17:43:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:43:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 17:43:22 +0000 Received: by pvg13 with SMTP id 13so597826pvg.35 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.89.1 with SMTP id r1mr4010857rvl.290.1273599780888; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.169.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:34:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd13a38869f9d0486550e4b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd13a38869f9d0486550e4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Perhaps this is guidance in the area you were hoping for: If your data is i= n objects that implement the interface 'Writable', then you can use the SequenceFileOutputFormat and SequenceFileInputFormat to store your intermediate data in binary form in disk-backed files called SequenceFiles. The serialization will happen through the write() and readFields() methods of your objects, which will automatically be called by the OutputFormat/InputFormat as they move through the system. So your subsequen= t MR pass will receive objects back in the same form as they were emitted. This is a considerably better idea (from both a throughput and a sanity perspective) in a chained MapReduce job. - Aaron On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > What objects are you referring to? I'm not sure I understand your questio= n. > - Aaron > > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. >> Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a good ide= a? >> Thanks again. >> >> Renato M. >> >> >> 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball >> >> > Renato, >> > >> > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, eac= h >> > pass >> > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads those >> same >> > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the last >> > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memory >> > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce job >> to >> > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. >> > >> > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write your >> > interim >> > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 and >> > writes >> > to /iteration1, etc.. >> > >> > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memory >> > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed >> key-value >> > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate >> > results. >> > But this will require some integration work on your part. >> > - Aaron >> > >> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, but= I >> am >> > > getting some into some "design" problems. >> > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and in >> each >> > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I would >> need >> > > to >> > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one tha= t >> > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those >> > values, >> > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried to >> test >> > it >> > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. >> > > Any suggestions, please??? >> > > >> > > Thanks in advance, >> > > >> > > >> > > Renato M. >> > > >> > >> > > --000e0cd13a38869f9d0486550e4b-- From general-return-1530-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 20:09:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32140 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 20:09:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 20:09:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30198 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29999 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47474 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 19:15:34 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of kiko@meebo-inc.com does not designate 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:15:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: @ Meebo - Data Engineer (Analytics) From: Kiko Griffin To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0ae4dd7e1a604865657e8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0ae4dd7e1a604865657e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! We have an immediate need here at Meebo and I'm positive someone from the community would be interested. This is a permanent opportunity located in Mountain View, CA. We are looking for a Data Engineer (Hadoop, MapReduce) to join the Meebo ranks. If at all interested OR know someone who might be interested please reply directly to Kiko@meebo-inc.com. data engineer, analytics Position located in Mountain View Meebo is seeking an empirically-minded groundbreaker to join its ranks. We love instrumentation, A/B testing, and take delight in uncovering the unexpected. We=92re seeking our next team member who will build a world-cla= ss product-oriented data system that will serve as the compass for nearly all strategic company decisions. This individual should have a deep desire to work with very large data sets to guide product decisions and to strengthen the end-user voice within Meebo. *In this role, your responsibilities will include:* - Design and deploy Meebo=92s core product data analysis framework that includes A/B testing, real-time log processing, segmentation capabilitie= s, and surfacing moving metrics to the most relevant teams - Create tools, web interfaces, and visualizations to allow product team= s and partners to access real-time usage statistics - Instrument JavaScript and C/C++ codebase to collect usage behavior dat= a - Proactively recommend metrics for understanding product health and use= r satisfaction - Collaborate with the Operations team to design and deploy Meebo=92s ne= xt generation distributed data system *To be most effective, you will have:* - BS or MS in Computer Science with an emphasis in Information Analytics= , Data Mining, Machine Learning, Information Retrieval, Artificial Intelligence, or related field - Expertise in MapReduce programming models such as Hadoop and other parallel computing implementations for processing and generating large d= ata sets - Scripting skills including HTML/CSS/JavaScript, Python, and SQL - The product and business savvy mindset to pinpoint what metric matters most and the communication skills to convey those thoughts to others *You will be measured by your ability to:* Work with a diverse team to cultivate ideas, foster user-centric thinking, and positively influence product direction Listen deeply to team product an= d business issues and make data and research suggestions that will best infor= m strategic-thinking Build a world-class stats infrastructure that is accessible company-wide that will serve as the groundwork for all future stats projects at Meebo --001636e0ae4dd7e1a604865657e8-- From general-return-1531-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 20:20:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34319 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 40187 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:20:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40108 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40100 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 20:20:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:20:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:20:19 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so3915725ywh.2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:19:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VI4+wZxqx3q/Lbxa2tmu6yG/LZU8hKJvfIdEzl9b3Gw=; b=Zbc0XKu4KIkYBrJfkUH41dm67tMKIj/aQR8Kil6In+uiS76ItmXTQ2Id0FNOU0twQs QBZkU88oTP72299dJeMH10iZi66QQIo2QCL/GNEDJeWMZBe8lMM4tasAZ1GqGaoA44v5 1gSckA+dRVBGZchlAg0Q9udypgARTbGn3yTCc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uMn6+D08Ypkufmk7CTRU3G/IBBxFoe3ugTik/nvsSkfL/vZWFCPIH/epBOWjZHr5Jw XKqhujaiFUmBHCyakp7oVIg5SxrVVnTJClBb+LkU7oUMQ74kbSckATQ5rG0akHODm++g 3ewt+dV4PWGWHYXHL2QY31Ks37b89vNkb0YpU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.2.13 with SMTP id e13mr2969071ani.107.1273609196882; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.231.13 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:19:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:19:56 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e357cc376080486573ff5 --0016368e357cc376080486573ff5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aaron, The thing is that I had a data structure that is saved into a vector, and this vector needs to be available for my MapReduce jobs while iterating. So would you think it would a good and easy way to serialize this objects? It'= s a vector that each node contains another user define data structure. Maybe = I will try to do it first just using files, and see how the throughput goes. Hey do you know where I can find some examples of serializing objects for Hadoop to save them into SequenceFiles? Thanks in advance. Renato M. 2010/5/11 Aaron Kimball > Perhaps this is guidance in the area you were hoping for: If your data is > in > objects that implement the interface 'Writable', then you can use the > SequenceFileOutputFormat and SequenceFileInputFormat to store your > intermediate data in binary form in disk-backed files called SequenceFile= s. > The serialization will happen through the write() and readFields() method= s > of your objects, which will automatically be called by the > OutputFormat/InputFormat as they move through the system. So your > subsequent > MR pass will receive objects back in the same form as they were emitted. > This is a considerably better idea (from both a throughput and a sanity > perspective) in a chained MapReduce job. > > - Aaron > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Kimball > wrote: > > > What objects are you referring to? I'm not sure I understand your > question. > > - Aaron > > > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. > >> Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a good > idea? > >> Thanks again. > >> > >> Renato M. > >> > >> > >> 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball > >> > >> > Renato, > >> > > >> > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, > each > >> > pass > >> > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads tho= se > >> same > >> > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the las= t > >> > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memor= y > >> > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce j= ob > >> to > >> > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. > >> > > >> > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write your > >> > interim > >> > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 an= d > >> > writes > >> > to /iteration1, etc.. > >> > > >> > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memor= y > >> > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed > >> key-value > >> > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate > >> > results. > >> > But this will require some integration work on your part. > >> > - Aaron > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, b= ut > I > >> am > >> > > getting some into some "design" problems. > >> > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and i= n > >> each > >> > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I wou= ld > >> need > >> > > to > >> > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one > that > >> > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve those > >> > values, > >> > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried t= o > >> test > >> > it > >> > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. > >> > > Any suggestions, please??? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks in advance, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Renato M. > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > --0016368e357cc376080486573ff5-- From general-return-1532-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 20:27:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35682 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 20:27:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 20:27:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 50236 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:27:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50193 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:27:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50185 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 20:27:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:27:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of corneliutudor.vlad@ens-lyon.fr designates 140.77.51.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [140.77.51.2] (HELO jabiru.ens-lyon.fr) (140.77.51.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE691EB199 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.1 (20080629) (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr Received: from jabiru.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jabiru.ens-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmpTj-Z-YYTq for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr (agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.51.15]) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ADF1EB1A2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by agrobate-domu-webmail.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id BCC9A581D0; Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-128-245.residence.ens-lyon.fr (dhcp-128-245.residence.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.128.245]) by webmail.ens-lyon.fr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20100511222650.10634snj3fsw2vt6@webmail.ens-lyon.fr> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 22:26:50 +0200 From: Corneliu-Tudor Vlad To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with Hadoop Streaming and -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum option References: <20100510160724.137264ztyvvvcie4@webmail.ens-lyon.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 Hello Thank you for the answer, it is a little clearer now. If you could =20 point me to some additional reading, I will be grateful. In the meantime I created an issue on Jira [ MAPREDUCE-1781 ] and I =20 both received answer there and provided insight on my objective. As I understand from both your answer and Hemanth's on Jira, I am =20 using Hadoop in a non-standard way. The reason is that I am performing =20 some test on the feasibility of using Hadoop as a parallelization =20 framework for a highly-CPU & memory bounded application, but only from =20 the point of view of the distributed computed, not multicore. That is =20 why I only want 1 process at a time. Additionally I will test it on a heterogenous datacenter, possibly =20 with both dual cores and quads, thus even if I use 2 mappers at once, =20 I won't fully use the power of the cluster (from what I understand). From what I tested today, my intended approach works with the =20 tasks.maximum option in the config file at startup. Thank you, T Quoting Eric Sammer : > The short answer is that with Hadoop, you generally do not decide the > exact number of map tasks that are spawned. The number of map tasks > spawned is usually a function of the number of blocks in the input > data set. Task trackers are configured with a number of slots for map > and reduce tasks. Tasks are assigned to slots on task trackers. By > default, task trackers have 2 map slots and 2 reduce slots per task > tracker. > > The manner with which Hadoop assigns tasks to task trackers is based > on a number of factors. > > You can attempt to control parallelization at a micro level (as you're > doing) but it's generally a bad idea. Not only are you not taking full > advantage of your cluster, but you are not taking advantage of what > Hadoop is actually good at. In fact, it may not be possible to control > it exactly as you wish. Is there a reason why you need to control > things so strictly? Do you need exactly a multiple of the number of > nodes, or an approximation thereof? What is the rationale for wanting > to run only one task per node? > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Corneliu-Tudor Vlad > wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I am a new user of Hadoop and I have some trouble using Hadoop Streaming = and >> the "-D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum" option. >> >> I'm experimenting with an unmanaged application (C++) which I want to run >> over several nodes in 2 scenarious >> 1) the number of maps (input splits) is equal to the number of nodes >> 2) the number of maps is a multiple of the number of nodes (5, 10, 20, ..= . >> >> Initially, when running the tests in scenario 1 I would sometimes get 2 >> process/node on half the nodes. However I fixed this by adding the direct= ive >> -D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=3D1, so everything works fine. >> >> In the case of scenario 2 (more maps than nodes) this directive no longer >> works, always obtaining 2 processes/node. I tested the even with putting >> maximum=3D5 and I still get 2 processes/node. >> >> The entire command I use is: >> >> /usr/bin/time --format=3D"-duration:\t%e |\t-MFaults:\t%F >> |\t-ContxtSwitch:\t%w" \ >> =A0/opt/hadoop/bin/hadoop jar >> /opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.2-streaming.jar \ >> =A0-D mapred.tasktracker.map.tasks.maximum=3D1 \ >> =A0-D mapred.map.tasks=3D30 \ >> =A0-D mapred.reduce.tasks=3D0 \ >> =A0-D io.file.buffer.size=3D5242880 \ >> =A0-libjars "/opt/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-7debug.jar" \ >> =A0-input input/test553short \ >> =A0-output out1 \ >> =A0-mapper "/opt/jobdata/script_1k" \ >> =A0-inputformat "me.MyInputFormat" >> >> I'm using is Debian Lenny x64, and Hadoop 0.20.2. >> >> My question is: why is this happening and how can I make it work properly >> (i.e. be able to limit exactly how many mappers I can have at 1 time per >> node) >> >> Thank you in advance, >> T >> >> > > > > -- > Eric Sammer > phone: +1-917-287-2675 > twitter: esammer > data: www.cloudera.com > From general-return-1533-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 20:34:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37153 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 20:34:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 20:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 62524 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62457 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62449 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 20:34:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:34:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:34:51 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so2132280gwj.35 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:34:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eEKOdMJ8X5vN5GF0Nle4fePK+loNo0HaMU8YxC+B5x8=; b=nL/t/nDOzyZD13Wr98eS9buH4fPI0rHVI2vUFHc2iBYIiK7IacFyr2SzmpvBQryqle pi/aLOUUtVLMM/tCyS50elA2Wwg2vHpa8a276z01edrSsw9NW1BR3GvCxYX/RK1OBkOW GOAlvAOrjkF1HAIECRwLpEqMJZs5CcoY0nJ1I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CqKQZuJSrps6Ml/fgdbjTiOpBDq4mj2M0TrPWcp5EaaHPZ567ktEHYNELYfqOGP3ZQ V0mKR1l8T0QIQQwaiMFrWA9u4TP+Oj0Kpft+eJ2T6g9mOKH+hR8I+BlTvrZncxMUKo7y ZO1JdYwhIiwxLTbWfUjCiHsuasp/i26O7kjrc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.172.4 with SMTP id z4mr3095903ano.197.1273610068736; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.141.16 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:34:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Probably the most direct route to get your desired result is to save the objects to either a SequenceFile or plain text file on DFS. Then in the configure() section of your mapreduce jobs, you open the file on DFS, stream contents into a local variable and refer to it as you need to. Either way, you'll need some sort of serialization via Writable or plain text. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > The thing is that I had a data structure that is saved into a vector, and > this vector needs to be available for my MapReduce jobs while iterating. = So > would you think it would a good and easy way to serialize this objects? I= t's > a vector that each node contains another user define data structure. Mayb= e I > will try to do it first just using files, and see how the throughput goes= . > Hey do you know where I can find some examples of serializing objects for > Hadoop to save them into SequenceFiles? > Thanks in advance. > > Renato M. > > > 2010/5/11 Aaron Kimball > >> Perhaps this is guidance in the area you were hoping for: If your data i= s >> in >> objects that implement the interface 'Writable', then you can use the >> SequenceFileOutputFormat and SequenceFileInputFormat to store your >> intermediate data in binary form in disk-backed files called SequenceFil= es. >> The serialization will happen through the write() and readFields() metho= ds >> of your objects, which will automatically be called by the >> OutputFormat/InputFormat as they move through the system. So your >> subsequent >> MR pass will receive objects back in the same form as they were emitted. >> This is a considerably better idea (from both a throughput and a sanity >> perspective) in a chained MapReduce job. >> >> - Aaron >> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Kimball >> wrote: >> >> > What objects are you referring to? I'm not sure I understand your >> question. >> > - Aaron >> > >> > >> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. >> >> Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a good >> idea? >> >> Thanks again. >> >> >> >> Renato M. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball >> >> >> >> > Renato, >> >> > >> >> > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow, >> each >> >> > pass >> >> > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads th= ose >> >> same >> >> > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the la= st >> >> > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent in-memo= ry >> >> > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduce = job >> >> to >> >> > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. >> >> > >> >> > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write you= r >> >> > interim >> >> > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 a= nd >> >> > writes >> >> > to /iteration1, etc.. >> >> > >> >> > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in memo= ry >> >> > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed >> >> key-value >> >> > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermediate >> >> > results. >> >> > But this will require some integration work on your part. >> >> > - Aaron >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < >> >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop, = but >> I >> >> am >> >> > > getting some into some "design" problems. >> >> > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, and = in >> >> each >> >> > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I wo= uld >> >> need >> >> > > to >> >> > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the one >> that >> >> > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve thos= e >> >> > values, >> >> > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I tried = to >> >> test >> >> > it >> >> > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. >> >> > > Any suggestions, please??? >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks in advance, >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > Renato M. >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > From general-return-1534-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 11 23:13:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82639 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 23:13:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 23:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16052 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 23:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15843 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 23:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15807 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 23:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 23:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.216] (HELO mail-gx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.217.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 23:13:32 +0000 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1151112gxk.9 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 16:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.1.2 with SMTP id d2mr2721841agi.121.1273619588779; Tue, 11 May 2010 16:13:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.97.2 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 16:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Christophe Bisciglia Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:12:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Hadoop Training @ Hadoop Summit - Early Bird Discount Expires Soon! To: general@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Fans, just a quick note about training options at the Hadoop Summit. There are discounts expiring soon, so if you planned to attend, or didn't know, we want to make sure you stay in the loop. We're offering certification courses for developers and admins, as well as an introduction to Hadoop. We'll also debut courses on Hive and HBase because you asked for them. You get the cost of your Summit registration ($100) off any of these courses just by using the discount code included with your Summit registration email confirmation, but if you register 45 days in advance, you save another $100 per day (and Monday's courses are just 47 days out now!). Intro to Hadoop (Monday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621620283/apache0511 Cloudera Desktop SDK (Monday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621677454/apache0511 Hadoop for Developers + Certification (Wednesday-Thursday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621640343/apache0511 Hadoop for Administrators + Certification (Wednesday-Thursday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621643352/apache0511 Hive (Friday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621672439/apache0511 HBase (Friday): http://www.eventbrite.com/event/621670433/apache0511 You can see an overview here: http://www.cloudera.com/hadoop-training/hadoop-summit-2010/ Cheers, Christophe -- get hadoop: cloudera.com/hadoop online training: cloudera.com/hadoop-training blog: cloudera.com/blog twitter: twitter.com/cloudera From general-return-1535-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 12 14:52:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8132 invoked from network); 12 May 2010 14:52:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 May 2010 14:52:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 82028 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 14:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81962 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 14:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81954 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2010 14:52:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 14:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 14:52:07 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so4586860ywh.2 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 07:51:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vC9COFOuVcxbNT7QaPQg6uBiZtJjoVwRBlDui5bJgL8=; b=uyS3BOMyw2hzUQf5vxLCYuqu7QOOpyTwz39o/JUgygamrkQsMO8akC7pZXvNT+aofG He34TXBYe2N40L2mSQn5XgcO7Ilz2izIGBbWkCnLgEyWscDKglSbqhz/3P0Cx2LSz2j/ 8hwOPATZzzBspF+SDB1lamDDyNJ9Oyimr52vw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wgrFFwUVYrjKtzpre5VFNJNLX73MQMvBPFtgPS3OltAq+FRSE+7meIPyAzcYi5ENDQ zNxJiI9aZX4YlnfYv3W421HF/Y+Z7Ll3x2laUzHYI2ZBqkDNgh0CHC0JFGXxKxo+GWV4 EnyrcE/5ub3YyR6a2iOmH8xkMe6EPQ0lxJmBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.245.40 with SMTP id s40mr4147421anh.137.1273675902272; Wed, 12 May 2010 07:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.154.10 with HTTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 07:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago Hadoop User Group Kick-off Meeting From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68dec4cb6ce4e048666c778 --0016e68dec4cb6ce4e048666c778 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The first meeting of the Chicago area Hadoop User Group will be help on Wednesday, May 19th from 6:00-8:00PM. The meeting will be held at Orbitz Worldwide headquarters located in the Citigroup building at 500 West Madison in downtown Chicago. Doug Cutting will give a talk by video conference, and we'll also hear about using R with Amazon's Elastic MapReduce. If you're planning to attend please send me a message by May 17th. You must bring a photo ID to present to security. Please check in at the 3rd floor visitor center as close to 6:00PM as possible and an Orbitz employee will escort you up to the meeting. Thanks! Hope to see you there. Jonathan --0016e68dec4cb6ce4e048666c778-- From general-return-1536-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 12 16:31:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34617 invoked from network); 12 May 2010 16:31:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 May 2010 16:31:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 43079 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 16:31:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43009 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 16:31:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43001 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2010 16:31:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 16:31:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chris.cooper@navteq.com designates 204.120.70.37 as permitted sender) Received: from [204.120.70.37] (HELO xmailfargo.navteq.com) (204.120.70.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 16:31:43 +0000 Received: from fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (navteq-spamfw.navteq.com [10.6.10.131]) by xmailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o4CGDHFC013903 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:13:17 -0500 Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id AC152491B125 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:31:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from imailfargo.navteq.com (imailfargo.navteq.com [10.6.10.130]) by fargo-spamfw.navteq.com with ESMTP id AteYSEEPdWBJInrd for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:31:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([10.8.222.172]) by imailfargo.navteq.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o4CGVLFp018002 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:31:21 -0500 Received: from hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::1dd0:ea36:7d35:db66]) by hq-ex-ht02.ad.navteq.com ([fe80::24f6:ca50:734d:df6e%14]) with mapi; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:31:21 -0500 From: "Cooper, Chris" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:31:20 -0500 Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago Hadoop User Group Kick-off Meeting Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago Hadoop User Group Kick-off Meeting Thread-Index: Acrx4rcvDX3MqTfcRBSSIlUB/zCxvwADc9Ng Message-ID: <76A09B97FD0B434ABCD9A75F688CF7E5038C8EB8@hq-ex-mb01.ad.navteq.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 SSBwbGFuIHRvIGF0dGVuZC4NCg0KLUNDDQoNCkNocmlzIENvb3Blcg0KQXJjaGl0ZWN0LKAgUiZE DQpOQVZURVENCjQyNSBXZXN0IFJhbmRvbHBoIFN0cmVldA0KQ2hpY2FnbywgSUwgNjA2MDYNCihU KSCgKzEgMzEyLTc4MC04OTkzDQooQymgICsxIDYzMC03NzYtNzg5OQ0Kd3d3Lm5hdnRlcS5jb20N Cg0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTogSm9uYXRoYW4gU2VpZG1hbiBb bWFpbHRvOmpvbmF0aGFuLnNlaWRtYW5AZ21haWwuY29tXSANClNlbnQ6IFdlZG5lc2RheSwgTWF5 IDEyLCAyMDEwIDk6NTIgQU0NClRvOiBnZW5lcmFsQGhhZG9vcC5hcGFjaGUub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0 OiBbQU5OT1VOQ0VdIENoaWNhZ28gSGFkb29wIFVzZXIgR3JvdXAgS2ljay1vZmYgTWVldGluZw0K DQpUaGUgZmlyc3QgbWVldGluZyBvZiB0aGUgQ2hpY2FnbyBhcmVhIEhhZG9vcCBVc2VyIEdyb3Vw IHdpbGwgYmUgaGVscCBvbg0KV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTl0aCBmcm9tIDY6MDAtODowMFBNLiBU aGUgbWVldGluZyB3aWxsIGJlIGhlbGQgYXQgIE9yYml0eg0KV29ybGR3aWRlIGhlYWRxdWFydGVy cyBsb2NhdGVkIGluIHRoZSBDaXRpZ3JvdXAgYnVpbGRpbmcgYXQgNTAwIFdlc3QgTWFkaXNvbg0K aW4gZG93bnRvd24gQ2hpY2Fnby4gRG91ZyBDdXR0aW5nIHdpbGwgZ2l2ZSBhIHRhbGsgYnkgdmlk ZW8gY29uZmVyZW5jZSwgYW5kDQp3ZSdsbCBhbHNvIGhlYXIgYWJvdXQgdXNpbmcgUiB3aXRoIEFt YXpvbidzIEVsYXN0aWMgTWFwUmVkdWNlLg0KDQpJZiB5b3UncmUgcGxhbm5pbmcgdG8gYXR0ZW5k IHBsZWFzZSBzZW5kIG1lIGEgbWVzc2FnZSBieSBNYXkgMTd0aC4gWW91IG11c3QNCmJyaW5nIGEg cGhvdG8gSUQgdG8gcHJlc2VudCB0byBzZWN1cml0eS4gUGxlYXNlIGNoZWNrIGluIGF0IHRoZSAz cmQgZmxvb3INCnZpc2l0b3IgY2VudGVyIGFzIGNsb3NlIHRvIDY6MDBQTSBhcyBwb3NzaWJsZSBh bmQgYW4gT3JiaXR6IGVtcGxveWVlIHdpbGwNCmVzY29ydCB5b3UgdXAgdG8gdGhlIG1lZXRpbmcu DQoNClRoYW5rcyEgSG9wZSB0byBzZWUgeW91IHRoZXJlLg0KDQpKb25hdGhhbg0KDQoNClRoZSBp bmZvcm1hdGlvbiBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBjb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIG1heSBiZSBDT05GSURF TlRJQUwgYW5kIGlzIGludGVuZGVkIG9ubHkgZm9yIHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIHJlY2lwaWVudChz KSBuYW1lZCBhYm92ZS4gIElmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQsIHlv dSBhcmUgaGVyZWJ5IG5vdGlmaWVkIHRoYXQgYW55IGRpc3NlbWluYXRpb24sIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlv biwgb3IgY29weWluZyBvZiB0aGlzIGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24sIG9yIGFueSBvZiBpdHMgY29udGVu dHMsIGlzIHN0cmljdGx5IHByb2hpYml0ZWQuICBJZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSByZWNlaXZlZCB0aGlzIGNv bW11bmljYXRpb24gaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkgdGhlIHNlbmRlciBhbmQgZGVsZXRl L2Rlc3Ryb3kgdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UgYW5kIGFueSBjb3B5IG9mIGl0IGZyb20geW91 ciBjb21wdXRlciBvciBwYXBlciBmaWxlcy4NCg== From general-return-1537-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 12 18:38:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78332 invoked from network); 12 May 2010 18:38:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 May 2010 18:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 34851 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 18:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34809 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2010 18:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34801 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2010 18:38:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 18:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonathan.seidman@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 18:38:07 +0000 Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so175929gyf.35 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:37:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=10JNZ62/SJf6EuhHgMTIjd5D2Jjo6NewhuPdaFGBQyM=; b=Lb6Y1MKuibp5gzWPq2bbr5KtNuz/eW3jwWGRV/sc4z9YEwncaPakh6RJbL04OhDOc3 Rz1M1JApw0HIBCX3a0wCaFwGkFto7Ys5AxyjNTPZBYMPd6rTMui+BTLEr2/Gqbazoc7d ntG7EvPL1IWO4i6UtXDR4GtQiwmUW2OWkJdpE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rDkcOQog7UCJUfRyFjsOfr/gVdtg44QoJVRVtsq8rPKptsUMclKQbD58G5f209ya6z 4aaCOq1h8wSfPogCYHW8Aww73+RR44ntnLuNXPCjlx6vVk8P2gGLMwoUnRLsQSQRxt43 87BhGU4+4i5JM14zpBH3e22Tfr8Nh0yw0jHo4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.28.24 with SMTP id f24mr4869046anj.253.1273689460275; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.154.10 with HTTP; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:37:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:37:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Chicago Hadoop User Group Kick-off Meeting From: Jonathan Seidman To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2aef3d5804a048669ef26 --001636b2aef3d5804a048669ef26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just want to add a couple of thanks: To Cloudera for providing sponsorship Orbitz Worldwide for hosting and Mike Segel of MSCC for providing the meetup group as well as organizational help. The meetup group can be found at: http://www.meetup.com/Chicago-area-Hadoop-User-Group-CHUG/ On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan Seidman < jonathan.seidman@gmail.com> wrote: > The first meeting of the Chicago area Hadoop User Group will be help on > Wednesday, May 19th from 6:00-8:00PM. The meeting will be held at Orbitz > Worldwide headquarters located in the Citigroup building at 500 West Madison > in downtown Chicago. Doug Cutting will give a talk by video conference, and > we'll also hear about using R with Amazon's Elastic MapReduce. > > If you're planning to attend please send me a message by May 17th. You must > bring a photo ID to present to security. Please check in at the 3rd floor > visitor center as close to 6:00PM as possible and an Orbitz employee will > escort you up to the meeting. > > Thanks! Hope to see you there. > > Jonathan > --001636b2aef3d5804a048669ef26-- From general-return-1538-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 16 02:05:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16211 invoked from network); 16 May 2010 02:05:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 May 2010 02:05:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 51849 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2010 02:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51779 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2010 02:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51771 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2010 02:05:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 May 2010 02:05:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 May 2010 02:05:31 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so2748420ywh.2 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wtaHIz0ZKJt61EPNNdsTQkzSRfGJHVMi8byOWHhv7Zo=; b=Awwm5VnZYol+gJ2oLzK2buEaY5LvNtaFfs0ZaxI+Kf7C8UU2I/rtkMxuKNzIfiSD85 oigHvkVDDe286S1iS9M9exzPSBAoolcoa6yHGqY8Ci1/qi/VIOl6uTeT3ZGji4aO03QV ihd7qDFhgz5eHwyMHFRlAexPqxc54VXASOy9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GgRvavQRdb5x+zshzZ3MnKwu9VK9dmkhYDd8f+tQYlV4NrtlQWt/0vroF5Hir/mPCS aHMjRPxf/An8ZX4HboToa6NgEkpyM4yEnswDf9LUMUe0XvVAEBkIRvX60VJFCXI571XT nXNVFSLuVMOTBVJBKK5O6IoJO5DLhepHM+md4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.193.40 with SMTP id v40mr4053970anp.204.1273975510479; Sat, 15 May 2010 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.91.7 with HTTP; Sat, 15 May 2010 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 21:05:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hadoop Data Sharing From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Renato_Marroqu=EDn_Mogrovejo?= To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c92a8ac136dc0486ac8924 --001636c92a8ac136dc0486ac8924 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for your replies. Yeah I have had to restructure a part of my code but it is all good now. Thanks again for your suggestions. Renato M. 2010/5/11 Jay Booth > Probably the most direct route to get your desired result is to save > the objects to either a SequenceFile or plain text file on DFS. Then > in the configure() section of your mapreduce jobs, you open the file > on DFS, stream contents into a local variable and refer to it as you > need to. Either way, you'll need some sort of serialization via > Writable or plain text. > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo > wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > > > The thing is that I had a data structure that is saved into a vector, a= nd > > this vector needs to be available for my MapReduce jobs while iterating= . > So > > would you think it would a good and easy way to serialize this objects? > It's > > a vector that each node contains another user define data structure. > Maybe I > > will try to do it first just using files, and see how the throughput > goes. > > Hey do you know where I can find some examples of serializing objects f= or > > Hadoop to save them into SequenceFiles? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Renato M. > > > > > > 2010/5/11 Aaron Kimball > > > >> Perhaps this is guidance in the area you were hoping for: If your data > is > >> in > >> objects that implement the interface 'Writable', then you can use the > >> SequenceFileOutputFormat and SequenceFileInputFormat to store your > >> intermediate data in binary form in disk-backed files called > SequenceFiles. > >> The serialization will happen through the write() and readFields() > methods > >> of your objects, which will automatically be called by the > >> OutputFormat/InputFormat as they move through the system. So your > >> subsequent > >> MR pass will receive objects back in the same form as they were emitte= d. > >> This is a considerably better idea (from both a throughput and a sanit= y > >> perspective) in a chained MapReduce job. > >> > >> - Aaron > >> > >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Aaron Kimball > >> wrote: > >> > >> > What objects are you referring to? I'm not sure I understand your > >> question. > >> > - Aaron > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks Aaron! I was thinking the same after doing some reading. > >> >> Man what about serialize the objects? Would you think that is a goo= d > >> idea? > >> >> Thanks again. > >> >> > >> >> Renato M. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2010/5/5 Aaron Kimball > >> >> > >> >> > Renato, > >> >> > > >> >> > In general if you need to perform a multi-pass MapReduce workflow= , > >> each > >> >> > pass > >> >> > materializes its output to files. The subsequent pass then reads > those > >> >> same > >> >> > files back in as input. This allows the workflow to start at the > last > >> >> > "checkpoint" if it gets interrupted. There is no persistent > in-memory > >> >> > distributed storage feature in Hadoop that would allow a MapReduc= e > job > >> >> to > >> >> > post results to memory for consumption by a subsequent job. > >> >> > > >> >> > So you would just read your initial data from /input, and write > your > >> >> > interim > >> >> > results to /iteration0. Then the next pass reads from /iteration0 > and > >> >> > writes > >> >> > to /iteration1, etc.. > >> >> > > >> >> > If your data is reasonably small and you think it could fit in > memory > >> >> > somewhere, then you could experiment with using other distributed > >> >> key-value > >> >> > stores (memcached[b], hbase, cassandra, etc..) to hold intermedia= te > >> >> > results. > >> >> > But this will require some integration work on your part. > >> >> > - Aaron > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Renato Marroqu=EDn Mogrovejo < > >> >> > renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Hi everyone, I have recently started to play around with hadoop= , > but > >> I > >> >> am > >> >> > > getting some into some "design" problems. > >> >> > > I need to make a loop to execute the same job several times, an= d > in > >> >> each > >> >> > > iteration get the processed values (not using a file because I > would > >> >> need > >> >> > > to > >> >> > > read it). I was using an static vector in my main class (the on= e > >> that > >> >> > > iterates and executes the job in each iteration) to retrieve > those > >> >> > values, > >> >> > > and it did work while I was using a standalone mode. Now I trie= d > to > >> >> test > >> >> > it > >> >> > > on a pseudo-distributed manner and obviously is not working. > >> >> > > Any suggestions, please??? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Thanks in advance, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Renato M. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > --001636c92a8ac136dc0486ac8924-- From general-return-1539-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 17 16:21:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9231 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 16:21:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 16:21:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 25955 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 16:21:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25489 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 16:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25469 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 16:21:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:21:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-283.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:20:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 8916 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 16:20:38 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.0.119]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username phunt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:20:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4BF16CD9.4020205@apache.org> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:20:41 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3.1 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.3.1 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.3.1/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-1540-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 17 16:58:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16984 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 16:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 16:58:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 16458 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 16:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16352 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 16:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16344 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 16:58:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:58:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.199] (HELO mail-qy0-f199.google.com) (209.85.221.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:58:06 +0000 Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so8190840qyk.22 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:57:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SV9RD1zo7PfE9uZREp2fBcR15WJBmVpq5iW/E2K3BE8=; b=H9ZYI/sbpl7LQahGXKsf17owbK3w+ksepiXOk8+CWJiEIM5l9A2b3HxgQgiZWLBGl6 IqiNoXBwJXB4a86eMMQ6WKpongtL/mvkhayViy66bWbZpfO1clvV1BVR42O9TMjiKOHZ Xc1dwUb5983vRaJm6Q9ku4SKmRBIU6G9wRlWM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GQ9sCCWWLCbDzBbxCSMQ1NX0HmMhL8WMjrKAzjo0I6ovPjl0r99slh0nTqsGs1itB2 2OCS6Jlzek0QkMc3uixRjq2Gl13jja+Pa5GEGhk8zQ8lo1jb44dYAqzi+S3YvI8D7zvt Y57L4QCBQvV+D/TQQQJndI0znYtdkU9VgC1Qo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.59.100 with SMTP id k36mr2979624qah.139.1274115463476; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.2.13 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:57:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: datanode goes down, maybe due to Unexpected problem in creating temporary file From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09fa21a7a9a77220486cd1f2b --00c09fa21a7a9a77220486cd1f2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, We use CDH2 hadoop-0.20.2+228 which crashed on datanode smsrv10.ciq.com I found this in datanode log: 2010-05-15 07:37:35,955 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:53378 dest: / 10.32.56.171:50010 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 10.32.56.171:50010, storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Can someone provide some clue ? Thanks --00c09fa21a7a9a77220486cd1f2b-- From general-return-1541-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 17 18:44:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56986 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 18:44:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 18:44:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 16734 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 18:44:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16685 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 18:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16677 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 18:44:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 18:44:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 18:43:54 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so636379iwn.35 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.178.132 with SMTP id bm4mr621415ibb.62.1274121812596; Mon, 17 May 2010 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.70 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:43:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: datanode goes down, maybe due to Unexpected problem in creating temporary file To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502bf630a5b130486ce9a50 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00504502bf630a5b130486ce9a50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ted, Can you please grep your NN and DN logs for blk_926027507678171558 and pastebin the results? -Todd On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Hi, > We use CDH2 hadoop-0.20.2+228 which crashed on datanode smsrv10.ciq.com > > I found this in datanode log: > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,955 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:53378 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > Can someone provide some clue ? > > Thanks > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --00504502bf630a5b130486ce9a50-- From general-return-1542-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 17 19:40:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6750 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 19:40:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 19:40:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 26211 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:40:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26140 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:40:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26132 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 19:40:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:40:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.199] (HELO mail-qy0-f199.google.com) (209.85.221.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:40:26 +0000 Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so8415535qyk.22 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:40:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=npZAw9KQBSirYJlCXlqmUU68xvT5MlEEDL6cAg10UbU=; b=f7m1LJGuqvxWv1t1ogSvo2yeAWBp3pQcGwocuVSB46GhJKcKdtc+YnF3lRUnesWioW bNnqZQRXCodjYL+80t6U7VEo0/2p5zQUxj1sYyEaEuQWlECtG0treKQqZLDUrGTqrBwy ZF9emQC/DW1itVhFDU2ziGhtA6drkrc14s6bA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Qni+lu+y+y1v8zAcpmIaj1f2DBU+xSjYyyN0ZYI4aorOtiHwpnuAknM/Yigak4tknD 0kOwY5sDQxVx8MBUSTF1Oo8RyPW0SaWX1avAI1Vlj5UbZ+s4E3f8yNYBd5VOVQJK74uU WH0a9pjiiFA02olkEwwflOE8rFw1hHQ8cgaVw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.65.158 with SMTP id j30mr3080071qai.390.1274125205035; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.57.80 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:40:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:40:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: datanode goes down, maybe due to Unexpected problem in creating temporary file From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9721e23edf3c0486cf64b8 --00c09f9721e23edf3c0486cf64b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That blk doesn't appear in NameNode log. For datanode, 2010-05-15 00:09:31,023 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:49172 dest: / 10.32.56.171:50010 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock blk_-5814095875968936685_2910 received exception java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_-5814095875968936685_2910. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_-5814095875968936685 should not be present, but is. 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 10.32.56.171:50010, storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 10.32.56.171:50010, storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:36887 dest: / 10.32.56.171:50010 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 10.32.56.171:50010, storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for blk_926027507678171558_3620. File /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 should not be present, but is. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2010-05-15 00:29:25,635 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:34823 dest: / 10.32.56.171:50010 On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Can you please grep your NN and DN logs for blk_926027507678171558 and > pastebin the results? > > -Todd > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Hi, > > We use CDH2 hadoop-0.20.2+228 which crashed on datanode smsrv10.ciq.com > > > > I found this in datanode log: > > > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,955 INFO > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:53378 dest: / > > 10.32.56.171:50010 > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 INFO > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > > > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > > should not be present, but is. > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 ERROR > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > > 10.32.56.171:50010, > > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > > > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > > should not be present, but is. > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > > > Can someone provide some clue ? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --00c09f9721e23edf3c0486cf64b8-- From general-return-1543-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 17 19:44:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9467 invoked from network); 17 May 2010 19:44:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 May 2010 19:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 32654 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:44:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32593 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2010 19:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32585 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2010 19:44:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:44:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-iw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 19:44:27 +0000 Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so682918iwn.35 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.125.129 with SMTP id y1mr659460ibr.96.1274125445264; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:44:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.70 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 12:43:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:43:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: datanode goes down, maybe due to Unexpected problem in creating temporary file To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64653be9076280486cf7291 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64653be9076280486cf7291 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Have you disabled the statechange log on the NN? This block has to be in there. Also, are you by any chance running with append enabled on unpatched 0.20? -Todd On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > That blk doesn't appear in NameNode log. > > For datanode, > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,023 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:49172 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_-5814095875968936685_2910 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_-5814095875968936685_2910. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_-5814095875968936685 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:36887 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > 2010-05-15 00:29:25,635 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:34823 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi Ted, > > > > Can you please grep your NN and DN logs for blk_926027507678171558 and > > pastebin the results? > > > > -Todd > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > We use CDH2 hadoop-0.20.2+228 which crashed on datanode > smsrv10.ciq.com > > > > > > I found this in datanode log: > > > > > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,955 INFO > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > > > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:53378 dest: / > > > 10.32.56.171:50010 > > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 INFO > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > > > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > > > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > > > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > > > > > > > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > > > should not be present, but is. > > > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 ERROR > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > > > 10.32.56.171:50010, > > > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, > infoPort=50075, > > > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > > > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > > > > > > > > > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > > > should not be present, but is. > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > > > > > Can someone provide some clue ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Todd Lipcon > > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e64653be9076280486cf7291-- From general-return-1544-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 18 01:20:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70899 invoked from network); 18 May 2010 01:20:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 May 2010 01:20:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19352 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19306 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19297 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2010 01:20:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 01:20:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.199] (HELO mail-qy0-f199.google.com) (209.85.221.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 01:19:53 +0000 Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so8876681qyk.22 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 18:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NskYMV/SCZwljOBocb+eUlCd30ENmKgWYqz7ijFajAQ=; b=qSqlLNS4YqGE0QaHM063hoMUQ7DkV4L8ra/5rnEkiGHG8IQz17olzPXlbdV20cCboV 8rpeqiERFoauDuVNI4sm99WE8d3LY2dSG+ctU6LLdwqxPJhlpL2F3CiXUla2XV7nmFnB PIJmh05100AfxJ/2sq7QND+otIaahh/fl5hCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PM1V4/hs13L9gEdRObVqgfXWo+c51U9lqcIP3VWD2UUj39+DZ+nVidHaJRUWi/a5Hf KswNwHKlzxRCGh8NQF7K8qsD5sByb0StYiQG1JpIQGJzSlUa5se7sSBeLtwPFmcwx0yy INEew08zYrx3SrS55sXrBizRcRjtbMriJAM3I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.86.207 with SMTP id t15mr3312321qal.227.1274145570737; Mon, 17 May 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.57.80 with HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 18:19:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:19:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: datanode goes down, maybe due to Unexpected problem in creating temporary file From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9db1be22cfe80486d422c7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f9db1be22cfe80486d422c7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 [sjc1-qa-certiq1.sjc1:hadoop 25763]df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 303346048 281730720 6206176 98% / In hadoop-hadoop-jobtracker- log repeated for over 50 minutes: 2010-05-18 00:57:38,451 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: Cleaning up the system directory 2010-05-18 00:57:38,452 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: problem cleaning system directory: hdfs:// sjc1-qa-certiq1.sjc1.carrieriq.com:9000/tmp/hadoop/mapred/system org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.SafeModeException: Cannot delete /tmp/hadoop/mapred/system. Name node is in safe mode. The reported blocks 793 needs additional 2 blocks to reach the threshold 0.9990 of total blocks 796. Safe mode will be turned off automatically. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.deleteInternal(FSNamesystem.java:1711) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.delete(FSNamesystem.java:1691) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.delete(NameNode.java:565) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor6.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:966) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:962) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:960) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:740) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy4.delete(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor5.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at $Proxy4.delete(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient.delete(DFSClient.java:586) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DistributedFileSystem.delete(DistributedFileSystem.java:227) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.(JobTracker.java:1710) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:188) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.startTracker(JobTracker.java:180) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.main(JobTracker.java:3735) In datanode log two entries were written after 793 blocks getting processed: 2010-05-17 16:56:22,135 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_5132109619501575576_2882 2010-05-17 17:06:22,245 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_-4733675789688469676_1685 2010-05-17 17:16:22,383 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_5502091787302369348_2833 2010-05-17 17:26:22,507 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_-6935269688635441525_1778 2010-05-17 17:36:22,709 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_8901766802925964345_1804 2010-05-17 17:41:43,929 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: *BlockReport of 793 blocks got processed in 107 msecs* 2010-05-17 17:46:23,065 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_-8536166246203803199_2384 2010-05-17 17:56:22,445 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataBlockScanner: Verification succeeded for blk_3069643184898592926_1667 I wonder what prevented from the last two blocks from being recognized by Namenode ? Here is the log from the other datanode: 2010-05-17 14:38:10,838 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 10.32.56.170:50010, storageID=DS-1307210060-10.32.56.170-50010-1274132290796, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020)In DataNode.run, data = FSDataset{dirpath='/home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/current'} 2010-05-17 14:38:10,839 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: using BLOCKREPORT_INTERVAL of 3600000msec Initial delay: 0msec 2010-05-17 14:38:10,887 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got processed in 5 msecs 2010-05-17 14:38:10,888 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Starting Periodic block scanner. 2010-05-17 15:15:51,037 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got processed in 3 msecs Currently our QA testing is blocked. Can someone provide help ? Thanks On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > That blk doesn't appear in NameNode log. > > For datanode, > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,023 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:49172 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,024 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_-5814095875968936685_2910 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_-5814095875968936685_2910. File > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_-5814095875968936685 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > 2010-05-15 00:09:31,025 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:36887 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > 2010-05-15 00:19:28,334 ERROR > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 10.32.56.171:50010, > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File > /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 > should not be present, but is. > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > 2010-05-15 00:29:25,635 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:34823 dest: / > 10.32.56.171:50010 > > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi Ted, >> >> Can you please grep your NN and DN logs for blk_926027507678171558 and >> pastebin the results? >> >> -Todd >> >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Ted Yu wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > We use CDH2 hadoop-0.20.2+228 which crashed on datanode smsrv10.ciq.com >> > >> > I found this in datanode log: >> > >> > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,955 INFO >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Receiving block >> > blk_926027507678171558_3620 src: /10.32.56.170:53378 dest: / >> > 10.32.56.171:50010 >> > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 INFO >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: writeBlock >> > blk_926027507678171558_3620 received exception java.io.IOException: >> > Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for >> > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File >> > >> > >> /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 >> > should not be present, but is. >> > 2010-05-15 07:37:35,956 ERROR >> > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( >> > 10.32.56.171:50010, >> > storageID=DS-1723593983-10.32.56.171-50010-1273792791835, >> infoPort=50075, >> > ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver >> > java.io.IOException: Unexpected problem in creating temporary file for >> > blk_926027507678171558_3620. File >> > >> > >> /home/hadoop/m2m_3.0.x/3.0.trunk.39-270238/data/hadoop-data/dfs/data/tmp/blk_926027507678171558 >> > should not be present, but is. >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:398) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset$FSVolume.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:376) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createTmpFile(FSDataset.java:1133) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:1022) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.(BlockReceiver.java:98) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataXceiver.java:259) >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:103) >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >> > >> > Can someone provide some clue ? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> > > --00c09f9db1be22cfe80486d422c7-- From general-return-1545-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 18 23:17:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6031 invoked from network); 18 May 2010 23:17:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 May 2010 23:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 96130 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 23:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96042 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2010 23:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96034 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2010 23:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 23:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 May 2010 23:17:21 +0000 Received: from phobos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F453815D for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 01:16:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by phobos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 19 May 2010 01:16:58 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Tue, 18 May 2010 19:16:57 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 19:13:34 -0400 Subject: Splitting support for bzip2 format Thread-Topic: Splitting support for bzip2 format Thread-Index: Acr2371iGU5aoj1YSjuGvD/mHAEcIw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {23E6B7C5-44E7-4511-B2C8-F8255A36B9D1} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: ZAY= AZIS BEt9 BOfv COZo CeSs Di2I EP54 FwNk Gxff HBkB H9UO IR7Q I/fG LQqE M6OP;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{23E6B7C5-44E7-4511-B2C8-F8255A36B9D1};ZABlAGUAcABpAGsAYQAuAGsAaABlAHIAYQBAAGEAdgBnAC4AYwBvAG0A;Tue, 18 May 2010 23:13:34 GMT;UwBwAGwAaQB0AHQAaQBuAGcAIABzAHUAcABwAG8AcgB0ACAAZgBvAHIAIABiAHoAaQBwADIAIABmAG8AcgBtAGEAdAA= acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F6EAmiranda_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F6EAmiranda_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Do we have a patch to support splitting with the bzip2 format for the curre= nt stable version 0.20.2 ? Refer to JIRA below : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 Thanks, Deepika --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F6EAmiranda_-- From general-return-1546-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 20 17:35:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13745 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 17:35:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 May 2010 17:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 86117 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 17:34:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86039 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 17:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86031 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 17:34:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 13677 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 17:34:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.0.113]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:34:33 +0000 Message-ID: <4BF572A9.80108@apache.org> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:34:33 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop takes Big Data beyond Java =?windows-1252?Q?=95_The_R?= =?windows-1252?Q?egister?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd like folks to know that I am misquoted in this article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/17/doug_cutting_hadoop/ First, I don't know what interview with me they're referring to. I've done no recent interviews with The Register. They assert that I said that Yahoo!'s work on security has delayed a 1.0 release. I have never said that and it is not something I believe. I did answer a question about 1.0 at yesterday's Chicago Hadoop Users Group meeting. I said that I personally felt we could call 0.20 1.0, but that the majority of contributors felt we should hold off, and that individuals don't make such decisions at Apache. I did not relate this to security or Y! in any way. That part seems to either be the misunderstanding or fabrication of El Reg. The spin of the article seems to be created by the author rather than anything I said. Doug From general-return-1547-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 20 20:56:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47031 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 20:56:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 May 2010 20:56:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1609 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 20:56:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1517 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2010 20:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1509 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2010 20:56:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 20:56:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 20:56:16 +0000 Received: from deimos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E806A38189 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 22:55:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by deimos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 20 May 2010 22:55:53 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Thu, 20 May 2010 16:55:50 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:52:26 -0400 Subject: Splitting support for bz2 format Thread-Topic: Splitting support for bz2 format Thread-Index: Acr4Xlq9EG5Aw3igQYSe/wj1m7nFhQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {9401D4F1-E630-48BE-AAF5-B16D1D4F454C} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AWEd AZsc BJTk B8Gw CF6a COjQ C2Bg DwCg EUld EbUQ Etnj Ezoe F0h3 Gy6Q Hxb2 IdpV;1;ZwBlAG4AZQByAGEAbABAAGgAYQBkAG8AbwBwAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{9401D4F1-E630-48BE-AAF5-B16D1D4F454C};ZABlAGUAcABpAGsAYQAuAGsAaABlAHIAYQBAAGEAdgBnAC4AYwBvAG0A;Thu, 20 May 2010 20:52:26 GMT;UwBwAGwAaQB0AHQAaQBuAGcAIABzAHUAcABwAG8AcgB0ACAAZgBvAHIAIABiAHoAMgAgAGYAbwByAG0AYQB0AA== acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F7D4miranda_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F7D4miranda_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Do we have a patch to support splitting with the bzip2 format for the curre= nt stable version 0.20.2 ? Please refer to JIRA below : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 Thanks, Deepika --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F7D4miranda_-- From general-return-1548-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 21 20:42:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15019 invoked from network); 21 May 2010 20:42:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 May 2010 20:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 36852 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2010 20:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36748 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2010 20:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36740 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2010 20:42:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:42:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 20:42:50 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so850589pxi.35 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.120.26 with SMTP id s26mr1458787wfc.141.1274474548306; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:42:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org As HDFS and MapReduce have matured the cost and complexity of introducing features has grown. Each new feature has to consider interactions with a growing set of existing features, a growing user base (upgrades, backwards compatibility) and additional use cases (more and more projects now build on them). At the same time we don't want the high bar for contribution to unnecessarily hinder new development and releases. Many projects at a similar stage address this by adopting a more formal way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to their platforms. Today, new features are often discussed via an umbrella jira, which may have an attached design document. There are a number of issues with this approach. The design documents vary in format and quality, and are often reviewed by a limited audience. They aren't version controlled. Sometimes the proposal is only partially specified. Jiras are often ignored. Understanding a proposal and it's implications through a series of threads in the jira comments is difficult. It's hard for contributors and users to find these top-level jiras and follow their status. I'd like to propose that core Hadoop adopts something similar to Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A "HEP" would be a single primary mechanism for proposing new features, incorporating community feedback, and recording decisions. The author of the HEP would be responsible for building consensus and moving the feature forward. Similarly, some subset of the community would be responsible for reviewing HEPs in a timely manner and identifying missing pieces in the proposal. Discussion would occur before patches showed up on jira. People interested in the core Hadoop roadmap could keep an eye on the HEPs without the overhead of following jira traffic. Why base this on the PEP? The format has proven useful to a substantial existing project, and I think the workflow is not too heavy-weight, and well-suited to a community such as ours. That being said, we could discuss other models (eg Java's JSR). Before we get into specifics, is this something the community would like to adopt in some form? Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? Thanks, Eli 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 From general-return-1549-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 02:26:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3366 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 02:26:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 02:26:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 90600 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90541 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90533 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:26:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:26:50 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so980527pwi.35 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.248.7 with SMTP id v7mr1766272rvh.252.1274495190015; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.42.239] ([38.102.147.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k17sm1433618rvh.17.2010.05.21.19.26.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 May 2010 19:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BF740CF.4080905@cloudera.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:26:23 -0700 From: Amr Awadallah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: Eli Collins Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? +1 On 5/21/2010 1:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > As HDFS and MapReduce have matured the cost and complexity of > introducing features has grown. Each new feature has to consider > interactions with a growing set of existing features, a growing user > base (upgrades, backwards compatibility) and additional use cases > (more and more projects now build on them). At the same time we don't > want the high bar for contribution to unnecessarily hinder new > development and releases. > > Many projects at a similar stage address this by adopting a more > formal way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to their > platforms. Today, new features are often discussed via an umbrella > jira, which may have an attached design document. There are a number > of issues with this approach. The design documents vary in format and > quality, and are often reviewed by a limited audience. They aren't > version controlled. Sometimes the proposal is only partially > specified. Jiras are often ignored. Understanding a proposal and it's > implications through a series of threads in the jira comments is > difficult. It's hard for contributors and users to find these > top-level jiras and follow their status. > > I'd like to propose that core Hadoop adopts something similar to > Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A "HEP" would be a > single primary mechanism for proposing new features, incorporating > community feedback, and recording decisions. The author of the HEP > would be responsible for building consensus and moving the feature > forward. Similarly, some subset of the community would be responsible > for reviewing HEPs in a timely manner and identifying missing pieces > in the proposal. Discussion would occur before patches showed up on > jira. People interested in the core Hadoop roadmap could keep an eye > on the HEPs without the overhead of following jira traffic. > > Why base this on the PEP? The format has proven useful to a > substantial existing project, and I think the workflow is not too > heavy-weight, and well-suited to a community such as ours. That being > said, we could discuss other models (eg Java's JSR). > > Before we get into specifics, is this something the community would > like to adopt in some form? Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to > our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? > > Thanks, > Eli > > 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 > From general-return-1550-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 02:38:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5001 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 02:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 02:38:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 93601 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:38:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93505 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:38:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93497 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 02:38:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:38:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.184] (HELO mail-qy0-f184.google.com) (209.85.221.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:38:33 +0000 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so219607qyk.21 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3d44V9v1VJoGxWuTVfQ/NR5wKKpoRjfnsAnyCnZavtE=; b=jkxfZ8k1Db7wTm/kEfgaZ8dN/mv7PUM5o3NN03RSawY649IGw3aicYDPNb4nV9BtY8 bOdb3T+KiMZf9DXeygbbSY702KV1yfb9Dso++EdMWnDDCuTsQD6CPPgoVIVq6JBIGIwe mVAnf5OkjSe/2HvwI4qg1aT2Jjq/84iqqkCo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vE5wLq2ZEODbY94bUIIopRF5tg2rrhIT2luR5MIQI0hLqB61NdbIMEgHtwqiRQIUtQ FarYgMecllTV8DyThdfhepk7RMsvA+cTvo017Trk9CMfW3EDdcH8l51TBjqUT5Sd8Lqv /nXLrSypBfSNgDHSney1CY2bEl8VXB74sGTi4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.193.9 with SMTP id ds9mr609690qcb.124.1274495892396; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.57.80 with HTTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:38:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: tasktracker JMX query From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8240ef1c87048725b291 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b8240ef1c87048725b291 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, We monitor number of open connections to task tracker: public static IMonitorQuery RPC_NUM_OPEN_CONNECTIONS = new JmxQuery("", HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_WILDCARD(), "NumOpenConnections", ReportType.PERIODIC, RPC_STATISTICS_QUERY); The above worked with 0.19.1 hadoop but when it doesn't work with 0.20.1: INFO [2010-05-21 19:26:06] (ExecUtil.java:232) - Exception in thread "agentQueryingTimer" java.lang.IllegalStateException: no object name for wildcard name 'hadoop.dfs:service=TaskTracker,*' found at service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://sjc9-flash-grid01.ciq.com:11004/jmxrmi I am wondering how we should query against 0.20.1 Thanks --0016363b8240ef1c87048725b291-- From general-return-1551-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 20:09:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14681 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 20:09:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 20:09:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 74787 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 20:09:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74702 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 20:09:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74694 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 20:09:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:09:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ndaley@mac.com designates 17.148.16.104 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.104] (HELO asmtpout029.mac.com) (17.148.16.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 20:09:07 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Received: from [10.45.223.96] (166-205-138-060.mobile.mymmode.com [166.205.138.60]) by asmtp029.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L2U00FNW7YE5V90@asmtp029.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 13:08:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1005220152 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-05-21_02:2010-02-06,2010-05-21,2010-05-22 signatures=0 Message-id: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> From: Nigel Daley To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-reply-to: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 13:08:32 -0700 References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 to better process around feature enhancements. I like that PEP also includes process enhancements too. For comparison, anyone have a references to similar processes? Cheers, Nige On May 21, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > As HDFS and MapReduce have matured the cost and complexity of > introducing features has grown. Each new feature has to consider > interactions with a growing set of existing features, a growing user > base (upgrades, backwards compatibility) and additional use cases > (more and more projects now build on them). At the same time we don't > want the high bar for contribution to unnecessarily hinder new > development and releases. > > Many projects at a similar stage address this by adopting a more > formal way to describe, socialize and shepherd enhancements to their > platforms. Today, new features are often discussed via an umbrella > jira, which may have an attached design document. There are a number > of issues with this approach. The design documents vary in format and > quality, and are often reviewed by a limited audience. They aren't > version controlled. Sometimes the proposal is only partially > specified. Jiras are often ignored. Understanding a proposal and it's > implications through a series of threads in the jira comments is > difficult. It's hard for contributors and users to find these > top-level jiras and follow their status. > > I'd like to propose that core Hadoop adopts something similar to > Python's PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) [1]. A "HEP" would be a > single primary mechanism for proposing new features, incorporating > community feedback, and recording decisions. The author of the HEP > would be responsible for building consensus and moving the feature > forward. Similarly, some subset of the community would be responsible > for reviewing HEPs in a timely manner and identifying missing pieces > in the proposal. Discussion would occur before patches showed up on > jira. People interested in the core Hadoop roadmap could keep an eye > on the HEPs without the overhead of following jira traffic. > > Why base this on the PEP? The format has proven useful to a > substantial existing project, and I think the workflow is not too > heavy-weight, and well-suited to a community such as ours. That being > said, we could discuss other models (eg Java's JSR). > > Before we get into specifics, is this something the community would > like to adopt in some form? Does adapting the PEP and its workflow to > our projects, community and bylaws seem reasonable? > > Thanks, > Eli > > 1. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001 From general-return-1552-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 21:10:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25089 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 21:10:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 21:10:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 96933 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 21:10:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96893 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 21:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96885 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 21:10:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:10:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.82.48 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:09:54 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so1411070wwb.35 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.157.134 with SMTP id o6mr1912507wek.201.1274562572733; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.11 with HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 00:09:32 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: How to write a complex Writable From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44ff8644e650487353971 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44ff8644e650487353971 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Since there are few sources on how to write a good Writable, I want to share some tips I've learned over the last few days, while writing a job that demanded some complex Writable object. I will be glad to hear more tips, corrections, etc. Wrtiables are a way to transfer complex data types from the mapper to the reducer (/ combiner), or as a flexible output format for mapreduce jobs. However, Hadoop does not always use them the way you think it does: 1. Hadoop reuses writable objects (at least the old API does) - so strange data miraculously appears in your writables, if they are not cleaned right before being used. 2. Hadoop compares Writables and hashes them a lot - so writing good "hashCode" and "equals" functions is a necessity. 3. Hadoop needs an empty constructor for writables - so if you write another constructor, be sure to also implement the empty one. Any complex writable object you write (complex = more then just a couple of fields) should: *. Override Object's "*equals*": compare all available fields (deep compare), check unique fields first, to avoid checking the rest. *. Override Object's "*hashCode*": the simplest way is XORing (^) the hash codes of the most important fields. *. Create an *empty constructor* - even if you don't need one. Implementing a different constructor is ok, as long as the empty is also available. *. Implement (the mandatory) Writable's *readFields()* and *write()*. Use versioning to allow scalability over time. In the very begining of readFields(), clear all available fields (lists, primitives, etc). The best way to to do that is to create a clearFields() function, that will be called both from "readFields()" and from the empty constructor. Remember Hadoop reuses writables (again, at least the old API - "mapred" - does), so this is not just a good habit, but clearly a must. *. implement "*read()*" - this isn't mandatory but it's simple and helpful: public static UserWritable read(DataInput in) throws IOException { UserWritable u = new UserWritable(); u.readFields(in); return u; } More golden tips are welcomed. So does remarks. -- Oded --001485f44ff8644e650487353971-- From general-return-1553-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 21:51:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29350 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 21:51:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 21:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 12079 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 21:51:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12033 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 21:51:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12025 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 21:51:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:51:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:51:28 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3604083qyk.20 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EWOX3nb/B8EMK7nyAx2ns1WozjIe8K6Y/SnE4FcqTqo=; b=M5MrB/B/HqXaTuwRIAEZj02Q8F1qndld2mtqgNmuxuiVSpmMO72+wRserzoP0wXLo2 eUw7s3BfLBbikJXYJUAdUWZektBpYRN39KpFnSX0kMNUVIjwVFttAFroSvCfRPaeOb+g qNxpq1bpmIj/eSuhmVgwZBn7Kvem+/f84+UTo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=opmlN+6QULxWiMCawJtP0lEVZy7UF9Mz7xTiHePjWu2l0FGQnpvzoljt/Oto+SrO6l 0rbusUtVTx4rm+hzJRlTKDgl6EqmR1k8Bui/FTh+q8SIHBddvG1fuGyq5bgtW13dHobc 1Fm2IAa1TQ6ZHsn+W642IjtlpaJwZ9SrojEjI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.87.149 with SMTP id w21mr2229572qal.18.1274565067587; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.57.80 with HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:51:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to write a complex Writable From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f99e5b018c1f0048735ce33 --00c09f99e5b018c1f0048735ce33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for sharing your precious experience. Hadoop achieves higher efficiency with Writables than with Serializables through object resuse. That's why clearFields() function is needed. In my job, I found it useful to persist the size of one record into DataInput before the actual record if your Writable instance has more than one record in it. This is for preparation of corrupt record (which we faced in our trial) so that you can skip to the next record and reduce data loss. Also DataOutput.writeUTF() may surprise you. At least it gave us a little surprise. Versioning is an interesting subject. I hope to see more suggestions on this topic. Cheers On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Oded Rosen wrote: > Since there are few sources on how to write a good Writable, > I want to share some tips I've learned over the last few days, while > writing > a job that demanded some complex Writable object. > I will be glad to hear more tips, corrections, etc. > > > Wrtiables are a way to transfer complex data types from the mapper to the > reducer (/ combiner), or as a flexible output format for mapreduce jobs. > However, Hadoop does not always use them the way you think it does: > 1. Hadoop reuses writable objects (at least the old API does) - so strange > data miraculously appears in your writables, if they are not cleaned right > before being used. > 2. Hadoop compares Writables and hashes them a lot - so writing good > "hashCode" and "equals" functions is a necessity. > 3. Hadoop needs an empty constructor for writables - so if you write > another > constructor, be sure to also implement the empty one. > > Any complex writable object you write (complex = more then just a couple of > fields) should: > > *. Override Object's "*equals*": compare all available fields (deep > compare), check unique fields first, to avoid checking the rest. > > *. Override Object's "*hashCode*": the simplest way is XORing (^) the hash > codes of the most important fields. > > *. Create an *empty constructor* - even if you don't need one. Implementing > a different constructor is ok, as long as the empty is also available. > > *. Implement (the mandatory) Writable's *readFields()* and *write()*. Use > versioning to allow scalability over time. > In the very begining of readFields(), clear all available fields (lists, > primitives, etc). > The best way to to do that is to create a clearFields() function, that will > be called both from "readFields()" and from the empty constructor. > Remember Hadoop reuses writables (again, at least the old API - "mapred" - > does), so this is not just a good habit, but clearly a must. > > *. implement "*read()*" - this isn't mandatory but it's simple and helpful: > > public static UserWritable read(DataInput in) throws IOException { > UserWritable u = new UserWritable(); > u.readFields(in); > return u; > } > > > More golden tips are welcomed. So does remarks. > > -- > Oded > --00c09f99e5b018c1f0048735ce33-- From general-return-1554-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 22:11:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35742 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 22:11:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 22:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 18032 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 22:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17986 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 22:11:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17978 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 22:11:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:11:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.82.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:11:42 +0000 Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so955578wyb.35 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:11:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.157.134 with SMTP id o6mr1944158wek.201.1274566281255; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.172.11 with HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 15:11:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 01:11:21 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to write a complex Writable From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44ff86fda220487361619 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44ff86fda220487361619 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, The "record size" tip looks helpful, But I do not like surprises (at least not while programming): what do you mean by "DataOutput.writeUTF() may surprise you"? On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Thanks for sharing your precious experience. > > Hadoop achieves higher efficiency with Writables than with Serializables > through object resuse. That's why clearFields() function is needed. > > In my job, I found it useful to persist the size of one record into > DataInput before the actual record if your Writable instance has more than > one record in it. This is for preparation of corrupt record (which we faced > in our trial) so that you can skip to the next record and reduce data loss. > > Also DataOutput.writeUTF() may surprise you. At least it gave us a little > surprise. > > Versioning is an interesting subject. I hope to see more suggestions on > this > topic. > > Cheers > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Oded Rosen > wrote: > > > Since there are few sources on how to write a good Writable, > > I want to share some tips I've learned over the last few days, while > > writing > > a job that demanded some complex Writable object. > > I will be glad to hear more tips, corrections, etc. > > > > > > Wrtiables are a way to transfer complex data types from the mapper to the > > reducer (/ combiner), or as a flexible output format for mapreduce jobs. > > However, Hadoop does not always use them the way you think it does: > > 1. Hadoop reuses writable objects (at least the old API does) - so > strange > > data miraculously appears in your writables, if they are not cleaned > right > > before being used. > > 2. Hadoop compares Writables and hashes them a lot - so writing good > > "hashCode" and "equals" functions is a necessity. > > 3. Hadoop needs an empty constructor for writables - so if you write > > another > > constructor, be sure to also implement the empty one. > > > > Any complex writable object you write (complex = more then just a couple > of > > fields) should: > > > > *. Override Object's "*equals*": compare all available fields (deep > > compare), check unique fields first, to avoid checking the rest. > > > > *. Override Object's "*hashCode*": the simplest way is XORing (^) the > hash > > codes of the most important fields. > > > > *. Create an *empty constructor* - even if you don't need one. > Implementing > > a different constructor is ok, as long as the empty is also available. > > > > *. Implement (the mandatory) Writable's *readFields()* and *write()*. Use > > versioning to allow scalability over time. > > In the very begining of readFields(), clear all available fields (lists, > > primitives, etc). > > The best way to to do that is to create a clearFields() function, that > will > > be called both from "readFields()" and from the empty constructor. > > Remember Hadoop reuses writables (again, at least the old API - "mapred" > - > > does), so this is not just a good habit, but clearly a must. > > > > *. implement "*read()*" - this isn't mandatory but it's simple and > helpful: > > > > public static UserWritable read(DataInput in) throws IOException { > > UserWritable u = new UserWritable(); > > u.readFields(in); > > return u; > > } > > > > > > More golden tips are welcomed. So does remarks. > > > > -- > > Oded > > > -- Oded --001485f44ff86fda220487361619-- From general-return-1555-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 22 22:13:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35868 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 22:13:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 22:13:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19544 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 22:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19486 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 22:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19475 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 22:13:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:13:03 +0000 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Lm8e1e0030bG4ec51mCicV; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:12:42 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([209.131.62.115]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LmCY1e0072VBGtd3PmCb8u; Sat, 22 May 2010 22:12:40 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: How to write a complex Writable Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:12:31 -0700 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 22, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Oded Rosen wrote: > *. Override Object's "*equals*": compare all available fields (deep > compare), check unique fields first, to avoid checking the rest. You should implement equals, but more important for keys is to define a RawComparator for your type. If you don't define one, the framework will de-serialize your type a *lot*. Look at one of the writables like IntWritable or Text for how to register your comparator. -- Owen From general-return-1556-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 24 16:16:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37128 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 16:16:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 16:16:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 12120 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 16:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12059 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 16:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12051 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 16:16:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:16:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:16:36 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so6312275qyk.20 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ijc7NdwZYmuEN4mbFbgIOGIV0PS4RU2nDZsDSxYJG6Q=; b=byIhSRul3DMaYu1rt3nbspqg1tvRnmhuXPPNe9hYkqJnxO0QbFWcrxjJ+jtRvQDQtN TeSRrN+EmPyp8gGPRUF6/PpG7Av/Kv7dugNZaGEf8LIOH9f6jwWqUpCLN4pQSsw0+G/1 o+eH2QfYxpcUw0B1TM4y6iV+vWxDt7s/HMALA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jnpGYVbFbyczXGqisU6+x7OurQM0HhbOxrff+avJ8NaDYg9DpqvIomEjc/4ZDDrXu+ ++WxfNTCFu2Hx57czBi8qW+v7XinEiKruthySSXhjh7oSPWnFabxfq9aJJhGdFPau2HV 6eANGh+NbeFTZpLiTHIVaj5+X2hG5FmxlcC9o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.88.220 with SMTP id b28mr3140404qam.91.1274717775312; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.57.80 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:16:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: checksum error From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09fa21a452fb8ec0487595cfe --00c09fa21a452fb8ec0487595cfe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We currently use hadoop 0.20.1 I found the following trace in our log: 2010-05-17 16:19:55,389 INFO [FSInputChecker] Found checksum error: b[0, 512]=3D53455106246f72672e6170616368652e6861646f6f702e696f2e426f6f6c65616e57= 72697461626c652b636f6d2e6361727269657269712e6d326d2e636f6d6d6f6e732e4f74615= 5706c6f61645772697461626c6501002a6f72672e6170616368652e6861646f6f702e696f2e= 636f6d70726573732e44656661756c74436f64656300000000aa555ae318451e8e76c0230f5= 6f74d1f000014660000000101789cdddb09785355da00e0ef26699bae49ba2f94de2ed43685= 7ab3364194b414294a355296e29aa449079025968ae82f78cb22051c088202e2125040d9acb= 88bc36410441d9dbf50dc1e06c57143749c8e0e0c7bff73ee92a6e9a7f23f33cef33f7f1f08= 39eff9ee3df77ef7dcedeb03130facc763b437197d76abd96237983c6e8399731b3d564395d= 9e2b6797c6e60b9268fdb5d55d56c31180c6693c56bb21bc9327683d5e036dadd162fb056af= c76ae17cd62a8bd1e7717b0d3e6f95d5e2357b4c55be260fd76406d6e76b32992c9e2aafdb6= 2b659bccd9cdb63b134f92c4d4d1e5b95d5e401d66430d8dc06b7d76e68f61a9acd469bdb6a= 37703ea3c9e33556594c1c19a5b9c964f671568bc96b34b83d55551eb2850693db6d767306b= 3d10a6c1367367bb9660f89b47a7d469fd96771db7d06aec9cbd9c9c69351ec5683917ce38c= 16bbcd62b17bcc4dcd96263347f6c4d2ecf536937d31588c16a3bdb9 org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumException: Checksum error: file:/incoming_ub/ciq_dca_uploads/2010/03/26/100813/17_00.ub at 0 at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.verifySum(FSInputChecker.java:277) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.readChecksumChunk(FSInputChecker.java:2= 41) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.fill(FSInputChecker.java:176= ) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read1(FSInputChecker.java:193) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read(FSInputChecker.java:158= ) at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:178) at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:152) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.init(SequenceFile.java:1450) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.(SequenceFile.java:1428) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.(SequenceFile.java:1417) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.(SequenceFile.java:1412) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.SequenceFileRecordReader.(SequenceFileRecord= Reader.java:43) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.ReportingSequenceFileRecordReader.(R= eportingSequenceFileRecordReader.java:54) at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor39.newInstance(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstru= ctorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.MultiFileRecordReader.assureReader(MultiFi= leRecordReader.java:128) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.MultiFileRecordReader.readNextFromAnyReade= r(MultiFileRecordReader.java:146) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.MultiFileRecordReader.readNextFromAnyReade= r(MultiFileRecordReader.java:181) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.MultiFileRecordReader.next(MultiFileRecord= Reader.java:122) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.util.hadoop.MultiFileRecordReader.next(MultiFileRecord= Reader.java:20) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.mmp2.input.BaseOtaUploadRecordReader.readNextUpload(Ba= seOtaUploadRecordReader.java:125) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.mmp2.input.OtaUploadToBinaryPackageRecordReader.next(O= taUploadToBinaryPackageRecordReader.java:176) at com.ciq.m2m.platform.mmp2.input.OtaUploadToBinaryPackageRecordReader.next(O= taUploadToBinaryPackageRecordReader.java:56) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.jav= a:192) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:176) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:358) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:307) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LocalJobRunner$Job.run(LocalJobRunner.java:176) If you saw similar trace before, please share your comment. Thanks --00c09fa21a452fb8ec0487595cfe-- From general-return-1557-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 24 21:39:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69062 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 21:39:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 21:39:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 97424 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 21:39:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97349 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 21:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97341 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 21:39:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:39:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:39:03 +0000 Received: from deimos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8404A3818A for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 23:38:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by deimos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 24 May 2010 23:38:42 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Mon, 24 May 2010 17:38:40 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:35:10 -0400 Subject: Hash Partitioner Thread-Topic: Hash Partitioner Thread-Index: Acr7iPzXnlegAwaWSIWvp8bSMNYjlw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F92Cmiranda_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F92Cmiranda_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am using a HashPartitioner on my key for a map reducer job. I am wonderi= ng how sometimes 2 reducers end up getting the same key ? I have the hashCo= de method defined for my key. Also, I have speculative execution turned off for my jobs.. Would appreciate any help. Thanks, Deepika --_000_DA852C02397DBC4EBFAA1B7192FBD15061DC83F92Cmiranda_-- From general-return-1558-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 24 22:07:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82826 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 22:07:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 22:07:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 41736 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 22:07:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41658 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 22:07:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41650 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 22:07:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:07:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:07:19 +0000 Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so335835wyb.35 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:06:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.147 with SMTP id r19mr4016428wel.70.1274738817329; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.80.14 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 15:06:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:06:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hash Partitioner From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Deepika: That sounds very strange. Can you let us know what version of Hadoop (e.g. Apache 0.20.x, CDH2, etc.) you're running and a bit more about your hashCode() implementation? When this happens, do you see the same values for the duplicate key? Did you also implement a grouping comparator? The hash partitioner is extremely simple. It basically does key.hashCode() % numberOfReduces =3D partition number to which a key is assigned. If one incorrectly implements a grouping comparator, it's possible you could see odd behavior, though. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Hi, > > I am using a HashPartitioner on my key for a map reducer job. =A0I am won= dering how sometimes 2 reducers end up getting the same key ? I have the ha= shCode method defined for my key. > > Also, I have speculative execution turned off for my jobs.. > > Would appreciate any help. > > Thanks, > Deepika > --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1559-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 24 22:33:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91804 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 22:33:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 22:33:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 69571 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 22:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69523 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 22:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69515 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 22:33:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:33:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:33:17 +0000 Received: from phobos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988BA38161 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 00:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by phobos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 25 May 2010 00:32:56 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Mon, 24 May 2010 18:32:54 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:32:52 -0400 Subject: RE: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Topic: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Index: Acr7jYB8UAeH7K8uQ3q/DfMQjjTWrwAAhQPw Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for your response Eric. I am using hadoop 0.20.2. Here is what the hashCode() implementation looks like (I actually had the I= DE generate it for me) Main key (for mapper & reducer): public int hashCode() { int result =3D kVersion; result =3D 31 * result + (aKey !=3D null ? aKey.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (gKey !=3D null ? gKey.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (int) (date ^ (date >>> 32)); result =3D 31 * result + (ma !=3D null ? ma.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (cl !=3D null ? cl.hashCode() : 0); return result; } =20 =20 aKey : AKey class =20 public int hashCode() { int result =3D kVersion; result =3D 31 * result + (v !=3D null ? v.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (s !=3D null ? s.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (o !=3D null ? o.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (l !=3D null ? l.hashCode() : 0); result =3D 31 * result + (e ? 1 : 0); //boolean result =3D 31 * result + (li ? 1 : 0); //boolean result =3D 31 * result + (aut ? 1 : 0); //boolean return result; } When this happens, I do see the same values for the key. Also I am not usin= g a grouping comparator. I was wondering since the call to HashPartitioner.getPartition() is done fr= om a map task, several of which are running on different machines, is it po= ssible that they get a different hashcode and hence get different reducers = assigned even when the key is the same. Thanks, Deepika -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 3:07 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hash Partitioner Deepika: That sounds very strange. Can you let us know what version of Hadoop (e.g. Apache 0.20.x, CDH2, etc.) you're running and a bit more about your hashCode() implementation? When this happens, do you see the same values for the duplicate key? Did you also implement a grouping comparator? The hash partitioner is extremely simple. It basically does key.hashCode() % numberOfReduces =3D partition number to which a key is assigned. If one incorrectly implements a grouping comparator, it's possible you could see odd behavior, though. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Hi, > > I am using a HashPartitioner on my key for a map reducer job. =A0I am won= dering how sometimes 2 reducers end up getting the same key ? I have the ha= shCode method defined for my key. > > Also, I have speculative execution turned off for my jobs.. > > Would appreciate any help. > > Thanks, > Deepika > --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1560-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 24 23:46:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11468 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 23:46:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 May 2010 23:46:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 36461 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 23:46:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36415 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2010 23:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36407 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2010 23:46:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 23:46:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [117.120.16.147] (HELO mail62.messagelabs.com) (117.120.16.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 23:46:48 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-62.messagelabs.com!1274744785!15816406!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=cardlink.com.au,-,- X-Originating-IP: [203.36.58.163] Received: (qmail 30288 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 23:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmail.5f55.cardlink.local) (203.36.58.163) by server-14.tower-62.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 May 2010 23:46:25 -0000 Received: from r-exchange.cardlink.local (r-exchange.cardlink.local [10.3.3.3]) by rmail.5f55.cardlink.local (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4ONkPN3030259 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 09:46:25 +1000 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB"; type="multipart/alternative" Subject: Active-Active Performance Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:46:24 +1000 Message-ID: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Active-Active Performance Thread-Index: Acr7m1GOZqwdJb/wQWutWjrPXspfRA== From: "Anthony Ikeda" To: ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB" ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm new to Hadoop and I've been given the task to see how we might utilise Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active site layer for sharing information across a distributed application. =20 I've been able to: * Install and get Hadoop running on a single node and am in the process of configure a 2 node setup. * Install HBase on a single node and create a table and mapping as well as insert data into the system =20 Once I've got the mutli-node configured I hope to run some tests as well. =20 I've noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the slave will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided the same path is setup on the remote machine. =20 Questions: Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation is not in the same location per machine? If the master node goes down (say due to electrical fault or system fault) how do the slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Will the nodes be back in sync once the master starts again? Would I require a particular configuration to ensure that both our sites can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fashion (due to maintenance or network issues)? =20 We want to ensure that data is added to HBase on each site with the data synced across both sites. If one site goes down then recovery of data is imperative. =20 =20 =20 Anthony Ikeda Java Analyst/Programmer Cardlink Services Limited Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard Rhodes NSW 2138 =20 Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61 2 9646 9221 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283 =20 =20 ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I’m new to Hadoop and I’ve been given the= task to see how we might utilise Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active= site layer for sharing information across a distributed application.=

 

I’ve been able to:

·      = ;   Install and get Hadoop running on a single = node and am in the process of configure a 2 node setup.

·      = ;   Install HBase on a single node and create a= table and mapping as well as insert data into the system

 

Once I’ve got the mutli-node configured I hope = to run some tests as well.

 

I’ve noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the slave will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided the same path is setup on the remote machine.<= o:p>

 

Questions:

Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation= is not in the same location per machine?

If the master node goes down (say due to electrical f= ault or system fault) how do the slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Wil= l the nodes be back in sync once the master starts again?

Would I require a particular configuration to ensure = that both our sites can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fas= hion (due to maintenance or network issues)?

 

We want to ensure that data is added to HBase on each= site with the=20data synced across both sites. If one site goes down then recov= ery of data is imperative.

 

 

 

Anthony Ikeda

Java Analyst/Programmer=

Cardlink Services Limited

Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard

Rhodes NSW 2138

 

Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61= 2 9646 9221 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283

3D"logo_cardlink1"

 


**********************************************************************
= This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form.
**********************************************************************
= ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB-- ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFB9B.51D6EEFB-- From general-return-1561-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 02:08:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60539 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:08:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:08:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23847 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:08:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23792 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23784 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 02:08:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:08:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:08:41 +0000 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so1261692pwi.35 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:08:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aLL4fV89N1BhJwSSwaSvpUKiZPYBefzzRopDg01nKY0=; b=t5UZbY98p/+mqyK3Q5D6/G/bCz/n5MjYdv480cPSqwf4tnnBsIa6uqa09yO9IWX6Q9 kY6kyBuP6ogs6ZjRNxfNi43UXEyka89lMMkCCpq2Dei0ywvd4REaS7/I0rGoYqd+QGN8 +LmeajtGEUeueHX/rYvEJnHVaTlFRVMhc7EcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nllhFku5gLwjdc02nn+bVRCZi2i9zikrXGXwZxKEzDbQkmUMC2wAHrX5URo1Gt1yuB 6GCLOwGkXO5OpNw7tJjjpqU96A4+98vcZUrubA7kCrjJFZMSo1y35SZWJkXkuEQ5BkNG /dToFUZN4KDeZrLNt2GOr4PJwtSSIIEQuAIaI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.27.12 with SMTP id e12mr4541520wfj.87.1274753300827; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.203.16 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:08:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 07:38:20 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cc73ac0e3f048761a1ba --00504502cc73ac0e3f048761a1ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anthony, I=92m new to Hadoop and I=92ve been given the task to see how we might util= ise > Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active site layer for sharing > information across a distributed application. > > > > I=92ve been able to: > > =B7 Install and get Hadoop running on a single node and am in the > process of configure a 2 node setup. > > =B7 Install HBase on a single node and create a table and mapping= as > well as insert data into the system > > > > Once I=92ve got the mutli-node configured I hope to run some tests as wel= l. > > > > I=92ve noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the slave > will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided th= e > same path is setup on the remote machine. > > > > Questions: > > Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation is not in the same > location per machine? > I would think configuring and managing such a system would get very complex - for e.g. if you'll want to add nodes to expand in future. You would also not be able to take advantage of the very helpful scripts that come with Hadoop. Is there a reason why you want to do this ? > If the master node goes down (say due to electrical fault or system fault= ) > how do the slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Will the nodes b= e > back in sync once the master starts again? > Hadoop slaves will continue. They will enter a retry loop trying to connect to the master until it comes up. In doing so, they could fill up log files very fast though. If the master starts with the same configuration, (same host, ports), they should be able to connect and resume. > Would I require a particular configuration to ensure that both our sites > can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fashion (due to > maintenance or network issues)? > > > I did not quite follow this. Can you explain a little more about how you want to setup your system ? Thanks Hemanth --00504502cc73ac0e3f048761a1ba-- From general-return-1562-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 02:13:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61258 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:13:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:13:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26555 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26512 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26502 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 02:13:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.82.242.195] (HELO mail16.messagelabs.com) (216.82.242.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:13:07 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-16.messagelabs.com!1274753561!5226447!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=cardlink.com.au,-,- X-Originating-IP: [203.36.58.163] Received: (qmail 11544 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmail.5f55.cardlink.local) (203.36.58.163) by server-12.tower-16.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Received: from r-exchange.cardlink.local (r-exchange.cardlink.local [10.3.3.3]) by rmail.5f55.cardlink.local (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4P2Ceb5017651 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 12:12:41 +1000 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Active-Active Performance Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:12:37 +1000 Message-ID: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Active-Active Performance Thread-Index: Acr7rzlKBO1sxD+mSPq4kslWPwyJNAAACHJg References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> From: "Anthony Ikeda" To: Thanks Hemanth, In regards to different locations of the HADOOP home this is low priority more for testing not production. I was trying to install HADOOP for testing over 2 machines with only a Windows XP machine running Cygwin and a Mac running Darwin. Not a priority. In regards to my last question about operating in a detached fashion, we are trying to factor in what happens when the link between both sites is cut. Will both sites operate independently until the connection is re-established? Is there any particular setup required to ensure we can cover this scenario or is it an out-of-the-box feature? Anthony -----Original Message----- From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:08 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance Anthony, I'm new to Hadoop and I've been given the task to see how we might utilise > Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active site layer for sharing > information across a distributed application. > > > > I've been able to: > > * Install and get Hadoop running on a single node and am in the > process of configure a 2 node setup. > > * Install HBase on a single node and create a table and mapping as > well as insert data into the system > > > > Once I've got the mutli-node configured I hope to run some tests as well. > > > > I've noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the slave > will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided the > same path is setup on the remote machine. > > > > Questions: > > Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation is not in the same > location per machine? > I would think configuring and managing such a system would get very complex - for e.g. if you'll want to add nodes to expand in future. You would also not be able to take advantage of the very helpful scripts that come with Hadoop. Is there a reason why you want to do this ? > If the master node goes down (say due to electrical fault or system fault) > how do the=20slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Will the nodes be > back in sync once the master starts again? > Hadoop slaves will continue. They will enter a retry loop trying to connect to the master until it comes up. In doing so, they could fill up log files very fast though. If the master starts with the same configuration, (same host, ports), they should be able to connect and resume. > Would I require a particular configuration to ensure that both our sites > can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fashion (due to > maintenance or network issues)? > > > I did not quite follow this. Can you explain a little more about how you want to setup your system ? Thanks Hemanth _____________________________________________________________________=20 This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed=20 Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information=20 visit http://www.mci.com ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** From general-return-1563-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 02:19:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62223 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:19:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 30645 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:19:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30560 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 02:19:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:19:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yhemanth@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:19:20 +0000 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so1267027pwi.35 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zj/3mW0+RjCkGi6AV8JaCqNkYB40t08bLaWG1dPKWF4=; b=akwqQVaYD3vHn3eZieMqwg3jnJi7TCAR1nB+jz3ZK1Bi9M1EFB1+0eWs2WnW+uE5RG SU684pYrV8JMEZN0t69AMzU99k6L7dcnrOp2SOkRQEL07jsKhh5ckNsMx6DXQGDj12Cq Nq6ipXgt5KJOrHv4z6AkBYBjYUBHDkpb7xcBE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=awDRufWeT9EtNQ+vfG7kc1Q28m8grmrrvZs++nMDPkki7YZ6VHWaTCVtltz21uScm6 LJUUOFguhK91gesEoNeHlRRuMcR+bZaMBNEbdQgPQLr81JUl84G14vtDnIEX2qPMTwuW 0Pe/9/sxj8+5JV6FqE4/32DD4mbxjFL+zGh8E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.2.2 with SMTP id 2mr4485602wfb.75.1274753940674; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.203.16 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 19:19:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 07:49:00 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance From: Hemanth Yamijala To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anthony, > In regards to different locations of the HADOOP home this is low > priority more for testing not production. I was trying to install HADOOP > for testing over 2 machines with only a Windows XP machine running > Cygwin and a Mac running Darwin. Not a priority. > > In regards to my last question about operating in a detached fashion, we > are trying to factor in what happens when the link between both sites is > cut. Will both sites operate independently until the connection is > re-established? Is there any particular setup required to ensure we can > cover this scenario or is it an out-of-the-box feature? When you say 'sites', do you mean two different Hadoop installations ? In general, each site is independent. So, I am unable to understand where the link comes in. > > Anthony > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:08 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance > > Anthony, > > I'm new to Hadoop and I've been given the task to see how we might > utilise >> Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active site layer for sharing >> information across a distributed application. >> >> >> >> I've been able to: >> >> * =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Install and get Hadoop running on a single node and am= in > the >> process of configure a 2 node setup. >> >> * =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Install HBase on a single node and create a table and > mapping as >> well as insert data into the system >> >> >> >> Once I've got the mutli-node configured I hope to run some tests as > well. >> >> >> >> I've noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the > slave >> will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided > the >> same path is setup on the remote machine. >> >> >> >> Questions: >> >> Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation is not in the > same >> location per machine? >> > > I would think configuring and managing such a system would get very > complex > - for e.g. if you'll want to add nodes to expand in future. You would > also > not be able to take advantage of the very helpful scripts that come with > Hadoop. Is there a reason why you want to do this ? > >> If the master node goes down (say due to electrical fault or system > fault) >> how do the slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Will the > nodes be >> back in sync once the master starts again? >> > > Hadoop slaves will continue. They will enter a retry loop trying to > connect > to the master until it comes up. In doing so, they could fill up log > files > very fast though. If the master starts with the same configuration, > (same > host, ports), they should be able to connect and resume. > >> Would I require a particular configuration to ensure that both our > sites >> can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fashion (due > to >> maintenance or network issues)? >> >> >> > I did not quite follow this. Can you explain a little more about how you > want to setup your system ? > > Thanks > Hemanth > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed > Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information > visit http://www.mci.com > > ********************************************************************** > This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of = the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, diss= emination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. =A0 If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately noti= fy the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) 96= 46 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain the = email or any attachments in any form. > ********************************************************************** > From general-return-1564-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 02:29:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64817 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:29:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 39304 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:29:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39190 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 02:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39182 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 02:29:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:29:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [117.120.20.163] (HELO mail118.messagelabs.com) (117.120.20.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:29:26 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-118.messagelabs.com!1274754537!43481323!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=cardlink.com.au,-,- X-Originating-IP: [203.36.58.163] Received: (qmail 23195 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 02:28:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmail.5f55.cardlink.local) (203.36.58.163) by server-2.tower-118.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 May 2010 02:28:58 -0000 Received: from r-exchange.cardlink.local (r-exchange.cardlink.local [10.3.3.3]) by rmail.5f55.cardlink.local (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4P2SuNF004760 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 12:28:56 +1000 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Active-Active Performance Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:28:56 +1000 Message-ID: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733FE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Active-Active Performance Thread-Index: Acr7sLZJABXNjv+kRxyednu9Bjl7VgAAE1Eg References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> From: "Anthony Ikeda" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sorry Hemantha, internal terminology :) We will most likely have 2 data centres (Site A and Site B) and we need da= ta to be available between the 2 sites, i.e., if Site A stores data, Site = B must be able to read it pretty much straight away. We are thinking of installing Hadoop and HBase on each Site to ensure data= stored at Site A is readily available for Site B. We are not sure how man= y installations are required per site yet but I'm guessing one site will h= ouse the Master the other the Slave. Because this is an Active-Active configuration, we need to ensure that if = the link between each site goes down, they can still operate to a degree a= nd once the link is recovered, both sites will sync up once more. Also from a maintenance point of view, we may wish to add more instances o= f Hadoop/HBase slaves on new machines in each site without disturbing the = operation of the application. Anthony -----Original Message----- From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:19 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance Anthony, > In regards to different locations of the HADOOP home this is low > priority more for testing not production. I was trying to install HADOOP= > for testing over 2 machines with only a Windows XP machine running > Cygwin and a Mac running Darwin. Not a priority. > > In regards to my last question about operating in a detached fashion, we= > are trying to factor in what happens when the link between both sites is= > cut. Will both sites operate independently until the connection is > re-established? Is there any particular setup required to ensure we can > cover this scenario or is it an out-of-the-box feature? When you say 'sites', do you mean two different Hadoop installations ? In general, each site is independent. So, I am unable to understand where the link comes in. > > Anthony > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hemanth Yamijala [mailto:yhemanth@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 12:08 PM > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance > > Anthony, > > I'm new to Hadoop and I've been given the task to see how we might > utilise >> Hadoop and HBase to implement an Active-Active site layer for sharing >> information across a distributed application. >> >> >> >> I've been able to: >> >> * =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Install and get Hadoop running on a single node and a= m in > the >> process of configure a 2 node setup. >> >> * =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Install HBase on a single node and create a table and= > mapping as >> well as insert data into the system >> >> >> >> Once I've got the mutli-node configured I hope to run some tests as > well. >> >> >> >> I've noticed that trying to start Hadoop in distributed mode, the > slave >> will ssh to the master to start it as well (bin/start-all.sh) provided > the >> same path is setup on the remote machine. >> >> >> >> Questions: >> >> Can I configure the system IF the Hadoop installation is not in the > same >> location per machine? >> > > I would think configuring and managing such a system=20would get very > complex > - for e.g. if you'll want to add nodes to expand in future. You would > also > not be able to take advantage of the very helpful scripts that come with= > Hadoop. Is there a reason why you want to do this ? > >> If the master node goes down (say due to electrical fault or system > fault) >> how do the slave nodes react? Will they continue to run? Will the > nodes be >> back in sync once the master starts again? >> > > Hadoop slaves will continue. They will enter a retry loop trying to > connect > to the master until it comes up. In doing so, they could fill up log > files > very fast though. If the master starts with the same configuration, > (same > host, ports), they should be able to connect and resume. > >> Would I require a particular configuration to ensure that both our > sites >> can operate within the cluster as well as in a detached fashion (due > to >> maintenance or network issues)? >> >> >> > I did not quite follow this. Can you explain a little more about how you= > want to setup your system ? > > Thanks > Hemanth > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed > Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information > visit http://www.mci.com > > ********************************************************************** > This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of= the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileg= ed and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, d= issemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. =A0 If you = believe you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately= notify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (= 02) 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not reta= in the email or any attachments in any form. > ********************************************************************** > _____________________________________________________________________=20 This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed=20 Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information=20 visit http://www.mci.com ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** From general-return-1565-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 08:10:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81287 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 08:10:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 08:10:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 90979 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 08:10:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90708 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 08:10:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90700 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 08:10:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:10:10 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so89965qyk.20 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.95.152 with SMTP id d24mr3740784qan.384.1274774988558; Tue, 25 May 2010 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.94.203 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 01:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 01:09:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8993f95c91f7048766ae55 --00c09f8993f95c91f7048766ae55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > For comparison, anyone have a references to similar processes? > Java has the Java Community Process: http://jcp.org/en/home/index --00c09f8993f95c91f7048766ae55-- From general-return-1566-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 10:04:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15479 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 10:04:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 10:04:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18307 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 10:04:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18037 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 10:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18029 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 10:04:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 10:04:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 10:04:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE000B7E48 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:04:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rQpt+rX-voBq for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:03:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D986FB7C6D for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:03:50 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1275386617.53637@tfPlj9dxNcrkHzeTvUjaDQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4PA3a1o002163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:03:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BFBA078.5000505@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:03:36 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Active-Active Performance References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733D2@r-exchange.cardlink.local> <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> In-Reply-To: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9733F9@r-exchange.cardlink.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o4PA3a1o002163 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Anthony Ikeda wrote: > Thanks Hemanth, > > In regards to different locations of the HADOOP home this is low > priority more for testing not production. I was trying to install HADOOP > for testing over 2 machines with only a Windows XP machine running > Cygwin and a Mac running Darwin. Not a priority. Things are much easier if -all your machines have the same OS, disk structure -you are running on linux -you use some CM tool to automate setup/deploy, pushing out of config files Start now, start with VMWare or virtualbox images now, so you learn about management sooner rather than later > In regards to my last question about operating in a detached fashion, we > are trying to factor in what happens when the link between both sites is > cut. Will both sites operate independently until the connection is > re-established? Is there any particular setup required to ensure we can > cover this scenario or is it an out-of-the-box feature? HDFS and the MapReduce engine is designed to run on a single datacentre with high bandwidth, high reliability links, current releases assume the facility is secure and all users are trusted. The key SPOF, the Namenode, doesn't do failover, so when it goes down or the network partitions, all machines that cannot see the NN poll and spin until it comes back -which can take a while, unless you have a secondary namenode to keep the persistent files up to date. the workers all assume that the hostname and IPAddr of the namenode doesn't change, and never reread their config. You could use DNS to do failover, but you have to tune the JVMs to not cache IP addresses for very long. To do cross site stuff you'd need a separate HDFS filesystem per site, synchronisation of data now becomes a task for the higher level apps. I don't know what HBase, Cassandra or other column DB tools do here. -steve From general-return-1567-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 15:10:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49859 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 15:10:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 15:10:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15778 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 15:10:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15690 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 15:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15682 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 15:10:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 15:10:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 15:10:13 +0000 Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so936019wyb.35 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.194 with SMTP id u44mr4626652wee.10.1274800192637; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.80.14 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:09:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner From: Eric Sammer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Thanks for your response Eric. > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2. > > Here is what the hashCode() implementation looks like (I actually had the= IDE generate it for me) > > Main key (for mapper & reducer): > > public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aKey !=3D null ? aKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (gKey !=3D null ? gKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (int) (date ^ (date >>> 32)); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (ma !=3D null ? ma.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (cl !=3D null ? cl.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > > > aKey : AKey class > > > =A0 =A0public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (v !=3D null ? v.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (s !=3D null ? s.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (o !=3D null ? o.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (l !=3D null ? l.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (e ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (li ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aut ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > Both of these look fine, assuming all the other hashCode()s return the same value every time. > When this happens, I do see the same values for the key. Also I am not us= ing a grouping comparator. So you see two reduce methods getting the same key with the same values? That's extremely odd. If this is the case, there's a bug in Hadoop. Can you find the relevant logs from the reducers where Hadoop fetches the map output? Does it look like its fetching the same output twice? Do the two tasks where you see the duplicates have the same task ID? Can you confirm the reduce tasks are from the same job ID for us? > I was wondering since the call to HashPartitioner.getPartition() is done = from a map task, several of which are running on different machines, is it = possible that they get a different hashcode and hence get different reducer= s assigned even when the key is the same. The hashCode() result should *always* be the same given the same internal state. In other words, it should be consistent and stable. If I have a string new String("hello world") it will always have the exact same hashCode(). If this isn't true, you will get wildly unpredictable results not just with Hadoop but with Java's comparators, collections, etc. --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1568-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 16:29:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82803 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 16:29:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 16:29:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 52869 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 16:29:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52822 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 16:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52814 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 16:29:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:29:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:29:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2259B7DEA for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:29:16 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id e7-GRQ3OK0Ay for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:29:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00D2B7E4E for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:29:05 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1275409733.08707@/hsN5ieyxyt4QFkzPxJATw Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4PGSpmt012881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:28:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:28:51 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o4PGSpmt012881 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >> For comparison, anyone have a references to similar processes? >> > > Java has the Java Community Process: http://jcp.org/en/home/index > a process that nobody liked, such as this comment by GregW of the jetty team on JSP 3 http://blogs.webtide.com/gregw/entry/servlet_3_0_public_review JCP has some advantage over standards bodies I've been in * they recognise the value of tests. * better remote collaboration * more open to interested third parties But that's it. Very vendor-managed, Sun was usually in charge, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone on the Apache jcp-open list (yes, we have one!) who is happy. I haven't looked at Elliot's proposal in enough detail to comment, here are my thoughts from working on the lifecycle stuff, and on other ASF projects * evolution in the codebase is a good way of getting stuff to meet people's needs. If you have to have big branches until things are perfect you have the cost of maintaining branches, its harder for people to experiment with your stuff. * If the cost of adding features is high -and maintaining branches, merging, identifying test failures is high- the barrier to participation is pretty steep. you need a team of engineers to work on every feature -steve From general-return-1569-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 18:22:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27214 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 18:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 18:22:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2828 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 18:22:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2652 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 18:22:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2642 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 18:22:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 18:22:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 18:22:19 +0000 Received: from EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (egl-ex07cas01.eglbp.corp.yahoo.com [203.83.248.208]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o4PILQZn083703 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=qiMv9/d1Ydw2qVt/XX+Y5Rfkb4FtdLwt5scg6bDWnSV7DKkhdNTZewUZYL+NeNQD Received: from EGL-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.205]) by EGL-EX07CAS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([203.83.248.215]) with mapi; Tue, 25 May 2010 23:51:26 +0530 From: "Ankur C. Goel" To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:51:24 +0530 Subject: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Topic: Hash Partitioner Thread-Index: Acr8HKEVbFionPTnTc+wSk5HMY3lnAAGnP0T Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C82212FC9C8Bgankuryahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C82212FC9C8Bgankuryahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another thing I would look at critically is to see if there are any bugs in= the write() and readFields() method of my key class as there could hard to= identify serialization / de-serialization issues. -@nkur On 5/25/10 8:39 PM, "Eric Sammer" wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Thanks for your response Eric. > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2. > > Here is what the hashCode() implementation looks like (I actually had the= IDE generate it for me) > > Main key (for mapper & reducer): > > public int hashCode() { > int result =3D kVersion; > result =3D 31 * result + (aKey !=3D null ? aKey.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (gKey !=3D null ? gKey.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (int) (date ^ (date >>> 32)); > result =3D 31 * result + (ma !=3D null ? ma.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (cl !=3D null ? cl.hashCode() : 0); > return result; > } > > > aKey : AKey class > > > public int hashCode() { > int result =3D kVersion; > result =3D 31 * result + (v !=3D null ? v.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (s !=3D null ? s.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (o !=3D null ? o.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (l !=3D null ? l.hashCode() : 0); > result =3D 31 * result + (e ? 1 : 0); //boolean > result =3D 31 * result + (li ? 1 : 0); //boolean > result =3D 31 * result + (aut ? 1 : 0); //boolean > return result; > } > Both of these look fine, assuming all the other hashCode()s return the same value every time. > When this happens, I do see the same values for the key. Also I am not us= ing a grouping comparator. So you see two reduce methods getting the same key with the same values? That's extremely odd. If this is the case, there's a bug in Hadoop. Can you find the relevant logs from the reducers where Hadoop fetches the map output? Does it look like its fetching the same output twice? Do the two tasks where you see the duplicates have the same task ID? Can you confirm the reduce tasks are from the same job ID for us? > I was wondering since the call to HashPartitioner.getPartition() is done = from a map task, several of which are running on different machines, is it = possible that they get a different hashcode and hence get different reducer= s assigned even when the key is the same. The hashCode() result should *always* be the same given the same internal state. In other words, it should be consistent and stable. If I have a string new String("hello world") it will always have the exact same hashCode(). If this isn't true, you will get wildly unpredictable results not just with Hadoop but with Java's comparators, collections, etc. -- Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com --_000_C82212FC9C8Bgankuryahooinccom_-- From general-return-1570-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 19:42:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85053 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 19:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 19:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25871 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 19:42:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25836 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 19:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25828 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 19:42:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 19:42:27 +0000 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so1870211pwi.35 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 12:42:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.209.15 with SMTP id h15mr4935829wfg.150.1274816526639; Tue, 25 May 2010 12:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 12:42:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:42:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>> >>> For comparison, anyone have a references to similar processes? >>> >> >> Java has the Java Community Process: http://jcp.org/en/home/index >> > > a process that nobody liked, such as this comment by GregW of the jetty t= eam > on JSP 3 > http://blogs.webtide.com/gregw/entry/servlet_3_0_public_review > > JCP has some advantage over standards bodies I've been in > =A0* they recognise the value of tests. > =A0* better remote collaboration > =A0* more open to interested third parties > But that's it. Very vendor-managed, Sun was usually in charge, you'd be h= ard > pressed to find anyone on the Apache jcp-open list (yes, we have one!) wh= o > is happy. The JCP seems heavy weight, we'll want to make sure the pendulum doesn't swing too far in the opposite direction. Would be interesting if there are other good light weight alternatives to the PEP, I looked and didn't turn up many. > * evolution in the codebase is a good way of getting stuff to meet people= 's > needs. If you have to have big branches until things are perfect you have > the cost of maintaining branches, its harder for people to experiment wit= h > your stuff. > * If the cost of adding features is high -and maintaining branches, mergi= ng, > identifying test failures is high- the barrier to participation is pretty > steep. you need a team of engineers to work on every feature The cost of adding features has gotten high anyway (even without branching). It's a classic trade-off -- merge overhead vs moving faster without burdening others -- as the overhead imposed on others increases, and tools (git) make it easier to live and collaborate on branches it makes more sense (you don't need a team of engineers or dedicated merge engineer to maintain the branch). Might find the following interesting: http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html Thanks, Eli From general-return-1571-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 20:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37408 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 20:08:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 20:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 67250 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67202 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67192 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 20:08:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of abhig@princeton.edu designates 128.112.128.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [128.112.128.213] (HELO ppa01.Princeton.EDU) (128.112.128.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:08:07 +0000 Received: from smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.148]) by ppa01.Princeton.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4PK7j7c009549 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:07:46 -0400 Received: from phy-abhig.Princeton.EDU (phy-abhig.Princeton.EDU [128.112.85.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver2.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o4PK7igm026083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 May 2010 16:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BFC2E10.3030206@princeton.edu> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:07:44 -0400 From: Abhishek Gupta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: HDFS documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am a new user for HDFS. I tried to understand the documentation given on the website but I am not able to get most of the things. Is there any complete or more elaborated documentation for HDFS configuration? If anyone has their configuration notes that can be shared, it would be great. Thanks, Abhi. From general-return-1572-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 20:17:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39243 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 20:17:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 20:17:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 80148 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:17:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80066 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80058 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 20:17:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:17:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:17:06 +0000 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so135681pvc.35 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:16:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.67.35 with SMTP id p35mr5466399wfa.203.1274818604084; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:16:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFC2E10.3030206@princeton.edu> References: <4BFC2E10.3030206@princeton.edu> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:16:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS documentation From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Abhi, Two good pages on HDFS configuration: * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs-default.html * http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html There's also an excellent chapter on HDFS configuration in Hadoop: the definitive guide. http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 Thanks, Eli On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Abhishek Gupta wrote: > Hi, > I am a new user for HDFS. I tried to understand the documentation given on > the website but I am not able to get most of the things. > Is there any complete or more elaborated documentation for HDFS > configuration? > If anyone has their configuration notes that can be shared, it would be > great. > Thanks, > Abhi. > From general-return-1573-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 20:18:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39698 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 20:18:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 20:18:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 83060 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:18:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82927 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82917 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 20:18:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:18:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:18:41 +0000 Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so1892501pwi.35 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.178.6 with SMTP id f6mr3734715wfp.342.1274818698228; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:18:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BFC2E10.3030206@princeton.edu> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:18:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HDFS documentation From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Forgot to mention, the following also has some good tips on HDFS-related configuration. http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/03/configuration-parameters-what-can-you-just-ignore Thanks, Eli On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Hey Abhi, > > Two good pages on HDFS configuration: > > * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs-default.html > * http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html > > There's also an excellent chapter on HDFS configuration in Hadoop: the > definitive guide. > > http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 > > Thanks, > Eli > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Abhishek Gupta wrote: >> Hi, >> I am a new user for HDFS. I tried to understand the documentation given on >> the website but I am not able to get most of the things. >> Is there any complete or more elaborated documentation for HDFS >> configuration? >> If anyone has their configuration notes that can be shared, it would be >> great. >> Thanks, >> Abhi. >> > From general-return-1574-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 20:33:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42418 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 20:33:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 20:33:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 96679 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:33:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96631 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 20:33:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96623 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 20:33:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:33:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of abhig@princeton.edu designates 128.112.128.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [128.112.128.214] (HELO ppa03.Princeton.EDU) (128.112.128.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:33:34 +0000 Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.65]) by ppa03.Princeton.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4PKXD2V029278 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:33:13 -0400 Received: from phy-abhig.Princeton.EDU (phy-abhig.Princeton.EDU [128.112.85.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id o4PKXC7h001997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 May 2010 16:33:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BFC3407.7020908@princeton.edu> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:33:11 -0400 From: Abhishek Gupta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: HDFS documentation References: <4BFC2E10.3030206@princeton.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Eli, Abhi. Eli Collins wrote: > Forgot to mention, the following also has some good tips on > HDFS-related configuration. > > http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/03/configuration-parameters-what-can-you-just-ignore > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> Hey Abhi, >> >> Two good pages on HDFS configuration: >> >> * http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hdfs-default.html >> * http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/tutorial/module2.html >> >> There's also an excellent chapter on HDFS configuration in Hadoop: the >> definitive guide. >> >> http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596521981 >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Abhishek Gupta wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I am a new user for HDFS. I tried to understand the documentation given on >>> the website but I am not able to get most of the things. >>> Is there any complete or more elaborated documentation for HDFS >>> configuration? >>> If anyone has their configuration notes that can be shared, it would be >>> great. >>> Thanks, >>> Abhi. >>> >>> From general-return-1575-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 25 21:03:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47671 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 21:03:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 21:03:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 32251 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 21:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32212 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 21:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32204 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 21:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:03:24 +0000 Received: from phobos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F937384C5 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 23:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by phobos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 25 May 2010 23:03:03 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Tue, 25 May 2010 17:03:01 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:03:00 -0400 Subject: RE: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Topic: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Index: Acr8HGcv7YU8+mRFRRShjsHCpuhKbQALyO+Q Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So I ran my process again with some more logging and here is what I see.=20 I used my own HashPartitioner(basically copied hadoop's partitioner and add= ed some logging for analysis).I printed here the Key and the reducer that i= s assigned to the key (based on the hash code).=20 My process triggered off 2 mappers (running on 2 different hadoop machines)= , hence both of these try to find reducers for the split file assigned to t= hem. I see that for a same object key assigned to both these mappers, I am = getting 2 different reducers allocated by the Partitioner. In the reducers I see - 1) 2 different reducers (the ones that the partitioner assigned the key to)= printing out the same Key (I did not print out the value as I thought that= wouldn't matter) 2) Here are the logs from where reducers copies data from the mapper - =09 Reducer1: 2010-05-25 11:34:49,810 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1002= 612 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 2010-05-25 11:34:49,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 -> (127, 36) from hadoop-49.c.a.com 2010-05-25 11:34:50,797 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000006_0: Got 1 new map-outputs 2010-05-25 11:34:54,835 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000006_0 Scheduled 1 outputs (0 slow hosts and0 dup host= s) 2010-05-25 11:34:54,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: header: a= ttempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0, compressed len: 1553902, decompressed = len: 1553898 2010-05-25 11:34:54,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Shuffling= 1553898 bytes (1553902 raw bytes) into RAM from attempt_201005251129_0001_= m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,924 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1553= 898 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,944 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 -> (143, 36) from hadoop-25.c.a.com Reducer2:=20 =20 2010-05-25 11:34:49,822 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 6376= 57 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 2010-05-25 11:34:49,911 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 -> (125, 36) from hadoop-49.c.a.com 2010-05-25 11:34:50,806 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000008_0: Got 1 new map-outputs 2010-05-25 11:34:54,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000008_0 Scheduled 1 outputs (0 slow hosts and0 dup host= s) 2010-05-25 11:34:54,920 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: header: a= ttempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0, compressed len: 1462335, decompressed = len: 1462331 2010-05-25 11:34:54,920 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Shuffling= 1462331 bytes (1462335 raw bytes) into RAM from attempt_201005251129_0001_= m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,937 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1462= 331 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,937 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 -> (147, 36) from hadoop-25.c.a.com The 2 reduce tasks have different task ids and belong to the same job. Thanks, Deepika -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:10 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Thanks for your response Eric. > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2. > > Here is what the hashCode() implementation looks like (I actually had the= IDE generate it for me) > > Main key (for mapper & reducer): > > public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aKey !=3D null ? aKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (gKey !=3D null ? gKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (int) (date ^ (date >>> 32)); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (ma !=3D null ? ma.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (cl !=3D null ? cl.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > > > aKey : AKey class > > > =A0 =A0public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (v !=3D null ? v.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (s !=3D null ? s.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (o !=3D null ? o.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (l !=3D null ? l.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (e ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (li ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aut ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > Both of these look fine, assuming all the other hashCode()s return the same value every time. > When this happens, I do see the same values for the key. Also I am not us= ing a grouping comparator. So you see two reduce methods getting the same key with the same values? That's extremely odd. If this is the case, there's a bug in Hadoop. Can you find the relevant logs from the reducers where Hadoop fetches the map output? Does it look like its fetching the same output twice? Do the two tasks where you see the duplicates have the same task ID? Can you confirm the reduce tasks are from the same job ID for us? > I was wondering since the call to HashPartitioner.getPartition() is done = from a map task, several of which are running on different machines, is it = possible that they get a different hashcode and hence get different reducer= s assigned even when the key is the same. The hashCode() result should *always* be the same given the same internal state. In other words, it should be consistent and stable. If I have a string new String("hello world") it will always have the exact same hashCode(). If this isn't true, you will get wildly unpredictable results not just with Hadoop but with Java's comparators, collections, etc. --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1576-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 03:08:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55643 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 03:08:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 03:08:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 39527 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 03:08:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39194 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 03:08:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89515 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 01:45:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sysolve@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.200 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zayNBjHIPbwZuBvCh3eJEEgAJqm6+VblqFU/cwJB5sI=; b=a+k4j5yUTYtvQgWtuXSvf2ijN9HfTnNlWBw6mw5X3SknuJMTBaEXjkndsgwiDvao/0 aDyN2UeqJAuOYRj04dI+72G6XiFyMxYp5cxPoAZJpQ7emZLAuShcs8xlFb4+FrrHFXwP 59gcF8ZmijFqCCwrmNEkOicq4zXhVWt8LdyYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jHJRp1mq6PY2RrN6Z9oNvkpY27KAXg6sCFDdz7q9G5V98A2dINepG5sbKZ/lRqOoy1 BM+1skzfS0qUj3X1koRwsXxCo8J4Huld0PP6+5lVbqSwpoA1AvcnD6Bk0OEeXty6eYec NpaDDqdFVYy3N42geseKfUPcDP//GXJvcsGiM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:44:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: why do data-local maps still need to do remote reads? From: Grace To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cc39f3d52f0487756a3d --00504502cc39f3d52f0487756a3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, According to the map task scheduling rules, it prefers a task with data local. And seeing the Data-local map counter(in the job report), it does have a very high locality for all the map tasks. However, when observing the metrics of DataNode( read_from_local and read_from_remote) , there is higher remote read rate than the job reported. It seems the Data-local Map counter is not so accurate as we expected. I wonder when or why it will trigger the HDFS remote read while already assigning a data-local map task. Thanks for your time. Best Regards, Grace --00504502cc39f3d52f0487756a3d-- From general-return-1577-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 04:49:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76874 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 04:49:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 04:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 951 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 04:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 567 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 04:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 558 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 04:49:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:49:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [117.120.16.163] (HELO mail88.messagelabs.com) (117.120.16.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:49:40 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-88.messagelabs.com!1274849354!30312359!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=cardlink.com.au,-,- X-Originating-IP: [203.36.58.163] Received: (qmail 27573 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 04:49:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmail.5f55.cardlink.local) (203.36.58.163) by server-2.tower-88.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 May 2010 04:49:15 -0000 Received: from r-exchange.cardlink.local (r-exchange.cardlink.local [10.3.3.3]) by rmail.5f55.cardlink.local (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4Q4n3S1032074 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:49:14 +1000 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55"; type="multipart/alternative" Subject: HBase and Stargate Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:49:12 +1000 Message-ID: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734BE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HBase and Stargate Thread-Index: Acr8jskK0LuaDwLUQLuIMnKZhn8k7Q== From: "Anthony Ikeda" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55" ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've created a client to connect to the Stargate REST interface which appears to be working. However, when I tried to create my initial table it appears that there is no data in the response. Is this expected? =20 I can't seem to locate any documentation on the Input/Output of calls to Stargate. The package-summary of the HBase API uses curl as an example with data being returned at the command line, but each call I make via JAX-WS the response is empty. When I use curl (on my Mac for example) nothing is returned to the command line. =20 Would I be correct in Assuming: PUT =3D void POST =3D void GET =3D String DELETE =3D void ? =20 Anthony Ikeda Java Analyst/Programmer Cardlink Services Limited Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard Rhodes NSW 2138 =20 Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61 2 9646 9221 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283 =20 =20 ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain=20information that is privileg= ed and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, d= issemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you be= lieve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately n= otify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02= ) 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain= the email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =

I’ve created a client to connect to the Stargat= e REST interface which appears to be working. However, when I tried to create my initial table it appears that there is no data in the response. Is this expected?

 

I can’t seem to locate any documentation on the= Input/Output of calls to Stargate. The package-summary of the HBase API us= es curl as an example with data being returned at the command line, but each = call I make via JAX-WS the response is empty. When I use curl (on my Mac for example) nothing is returned to the command line.

 

Would I be correct in Assuming:

PUT =3D void

POST =3D void

GET =3D String

DELETE =3D void   ?

 

Anthony Ikeda

Java Analyst/Programmer=

Cardlink Services Limited

Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard

Rhodes NSW 2138

 

Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61= 2 9646 9221 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283

3D"logo_cardlink1"

 


**********************************************************************
= This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form.
**********************************************************************
= ------_=_NextPart_002_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55-- ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8E.C9F41A55-- From general-return-1578-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 04:52:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77162 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 04:52:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 04:52:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 04:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2386 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 04:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2378 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 04:52:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [117.120.16.147] (HELO mail62.messagelabs.com) (117.120.16.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:52:36 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-62.messagelabs.com!1274849530!14692121!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=cardlink.com.au,-,- X-Originating-IP: [203.36.58.163] Received: (qmail 6112 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 04:52:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmail.5f55.cardlink.local) (203.36.58.163) by server-11.tower-62.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 May 2010 04:52:10 -0000 Received: from r-exchange.cardlink.local (r-exchange.cardlink.local [10.3.3.3]) by rmail.5f55.cardlink.local (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4Q4qAfI017831 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:52:10 +1000 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8F.33082EB7" Subject: RE: HBase and Stargate Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:52:09 +1000 Message-ID: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734C1@r-exchange.cardlink.local> In-Reply-To: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734BE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HBase and Stargate Thread-Index: Acr8jskK0LuaDwLUQLuIMnKZhn8k7QAAFw8g References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734BE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> From: "Anthony Ikeda" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8F.33082EB7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've also noticed that creating a scanner is not returning me the scanner URI. =20 From: Anthony Ikeda [mailto:Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au]=20 Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2010 2:49 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: HBase and Stargate =20 I've created a client to connect to the Stargate REST interface which appears to be working. However, when I tried to create my initial table it appears that there is no data in the response. Is this expected? =20 I can't seem to locate any documentation on the Input/Output of calls to Stargate. The package-summary of the HBase API uses curl as an example with data being returned at the command line, but each call I make via JAX-WS the response is empty. When I use curl (on my Mac for example) nothing is returned to the command line. =20 Would I be correct in Assuming: PUT =3D void POST =3D void GET =3D String DELETE =3D void ? =20 Anthony Ikeda Java Analyst/Programmer Cardlink Services Limited Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard Rhodes NSW 2138 =20 Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61 2 9646 9221 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283 logo_cardlink1 =20 ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you believe you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain the email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** _____________________________________________________________________=20 This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed=20 Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information=20 visit http://www.mci.com ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of t= he addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged= and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dis= semination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you beli= eve you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately not= ify the sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) = 9646 9222. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain t= he email or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAFC8F.33082EB7-- From general-return-1579-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 06:42:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12171 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 06:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 06:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 82026 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 06:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81698 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 06:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81683 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 06:42:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:42:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jgray@facebook.com designates 69.63.179.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.179.25] (HELO mailout-sf2p.facebook.com) (69.63.179.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 06:42:16 +0000 Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([192.168.18.105]) by pp02.snc1.tfbnw.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4Q6fAmE020755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 May 2010 23:41:10 -0700 Received: from SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.102]) by sc-hub02.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.105]) with mapi; Tue, 25 May 2010 23:41:48 -0700 From: Jonathan Gray To: "user@hbase.apache.org" , "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au" Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:41:44 -0700 Subject: RE: HBase and Stargate Thread-Topic: HBase and Stargate Thread-Index: Acr8jskK0LuaDwLUQLuIMnKZhn8k7QAD4eMA Message-ID: <8D66B74984F9564BBB25C3C67D630F2D68C7CEAC@SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com> References: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734BE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> In-Reply-To: <590CDE7A083C4142AF05E96F2FB543BC9734BE@r-exchange.cardlink.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D66B74984F9564BBB25C3C67D630F2D68C7CEACSCMBXC1TheFaceb_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-05-26_01:2010-02-06,2010-05-25,2010-05-25 signatures=0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_8D66B74984F9564BBB25C3C67D630F2D68C7CEACSCMBXC1TheFaceb_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Redirecting to user@hbase mailing list where you might get an answer. From: Anthony Ikeda [mailto:Anthony.Ikeda@cardlink.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:49 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: HBase and Stargate I've created a client to connect to the Stargate REST interface which appea= rs to be working. However, when I tried to create my initial table it appea= rs that there is no data in the response. Is this expected? I can't seem to locate any documentation on the Input/Output of calls to St= argate. The package-summary of the HBase API uses curl as an example with d= ata being returned at the command line, but each call I make via JAX-WS the= response is empty. When I use curl (on my Mac for example) nothing is retu= rned to the command line. Would I be correct in Assuming: PUT =3D void POST =3D void GET =3D String DELETE =3D void ? Anthony Ikeda Java Analyst/Programmer Cardlink Services Limited Level 4, 3 Rider Boulevard Rhodes NSW 2138 Web: www.cardlink.com.au | Tel: + 61 2 9646 922= 1 | Fax: + 61 2 9646 9283 [cid:image001.gif@01CAFCE2.024A9090] ********************************************************************** This e-mail message and any attachments are intended only for the use of th= e addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged a= nd confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any display, dissem= ination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you believe yo= u have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the= sender by replying to this e-mail message or by telephone to (02) 9646 922= 2. Please delete the email and any attachments and do not retain the email = or any attachments in any form. ********************************************************************** --_000_8D66B74984F9564BBB25C3C67D630F2D68C7CEACSCMBXC1TheFaceb_-- From general-return-1580-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 10:25:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78209 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 10:25:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 10:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 34551 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 10:25:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34319 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 10:25:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34311 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 10:25:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:25:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9034B7EBB for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:24:39 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gDZ6Mp8VwFLF for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:24:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979F4B7EB4 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:24:28 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1275474255.89919@i0laM/zKvvGP4s+Uc+iHtg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o4QAOEnQ005323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:24:15 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:24:15 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o4QAOEnQ005323 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli Collins wrote: > The cost of adding features has gotten high anyway (even without > branching). It's a classic trade-off -- merge overhead vs moving > faster without burdening others -- as the overhead imposed on others > increases, and tools (git) make it easier to live and collaborate on > branches it makes more sense maybe, but if you are trying to keep >1 branch in sync, all the low cost refactorings become expensive to perform -renaming variables -hitting the reformat-code button to align the code with the project layout rules -moving methods around Life is simplest if you own the entire codebase and can move stuff around without any discussion. Closed source projects can do that, but even then it annoys other team members. In any OSS project, keeping stuff more stable makes it easier to take in third party patches, and ensures that stack traces from various versions all point to roughly the same code, always handy. Once you try to keep multiple branches alive, it becomes very hard to do big changes in trunk. >(you don't need a team of engineers or > dedicated merge engineer to maintain the branch). No, but I'd estimate the cost of merging at 1-2 days work a week just to pull in the code *and identify why the tests are failing*. Git may be better at merging in changes, but if Hadoop doesn't work on my machine after the merge, I need to identify whether its my code, the merged code, some machine quirk, etc. It's the testing that is the problem for me, not the merge effort. That's the Hadoop own tests any my own functional test suites, the ones that bring up clusters and push work through. Those are the troublespots, as they do things that hadoop's own tests don't do, like as for all the JSP pages. > Might find the > following interesting: > http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html There's a long story behind JDD's paper, I'm glad you have read it, it does lay out what is effectively the ASF process for effecting significant change -but it doesn't imply that's the only process for having changes. One of the big issues that in any successful project it becomes hard to do a big rewrite, and you end up with what was done early on, despite known issues. The "Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0" discussion is related to this we -and I wasn't a committer at this time, just a user- weren't able to do the big rework so we are left today with the design errors of the past (like the way undefined properties just get retained as ${undefined.property} instead of some kind of error appearing): http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg05984.html I think gradual evolution in trunk is good, it lets people play with what's coming in. Having lots of separate branches and everyone's private release being a merge of many patches that you choose is bad. Because it means my version != your version != anyone else's, which implies that your tests mean nothing to me unless I also test at scale. Which I can do, but with different hardware and network configs from other people, it's still tricky to assign blame. Is it my merge that isn't working, is it some quirk of virtualisation underneath, or is it just this week's trunk playing up? From general-return-1581-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 26 16:14:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19291 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 16:14:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 16:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 22127 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 16:14:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22056 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 16:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22048 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 16:14:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-px0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:13:52 +0000 Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so4000088pxi.35 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.169.5 with SMTP id w5mr5712233wfo.222.1274890411112; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:13:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > No, but I'd estimate the cost of merging at 1-2 days work a week just to > pull in the code *and identify why the tests are failing*. Git may be better > at merging in changes, but if Hadoop doesn't work on my machine after the > merge, I need to identify whether its my code, the merged code, some machine > quirk, etc. It's the testing that is the problem for me, not the > merge effort. That's the Hadoop own tests any my own functional test suites, > the ones that bring up clusters and push work through. Those are the > troublespots, as they do things that hadoop's own tests don't do, like as > for all the JSP pages. I've lived off a git branch of common/hdfs for half a year with a big uncommitted patch, it's no where near 1-2 days of effort per week to merge in changes from trunk. If the tests are passing on trunk, and they fail after your merge then those are real test failures due to your change (and therefore should require effort). The issues with your internal tests failing due to changes on trunk is the same whether you merge or you just do an update - you have to update before checking in the patch anyway - so that issue is about the state of trunk when you merge or update, rather than about being on a branch. > >> Might find the >> following interesting: >> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html > > There's a long story behind JDD's paper, I'm glad you have read it, it does > lay out what is effectively the ASF process for effecting significant change > -but it doesn't imply that's the only process for having changes. > Just to be clear I don't mean imply that branches are the only process for making changes. Interesting that this is considered the effective ASF process, it hasn't seemed to me that recent big features on hadoop have used it, only one I'm aware of that was done on a branch was append. > I think gradual evolution in trunk is good, it lets people play with what's > coming in. Having lots of separate branches and everyone's private release > being a merge of many patches that you choose is bad. Agreed. Personally I don't think people should release from branches. And in practice I don't think you'll see lots of branches, people can and would still develop on trunk. Getting changes merged from a branch back to trunk before the whole branch is merged is a good thing, the whole branch may never be merged and that's OK too. Branches are a mechanism, releases are policy. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1582-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 27 05:46:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23980 invoked from network); 27 May 2010 05:46:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 May 2010 05:46:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 49777 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 05:46:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49551 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 05:46:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49543 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2010 05:46:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:46:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vidur@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [121.242.23.201] (HELO students.iiit.ac.in) (121.242.23.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 05:46:31 +0000 Received: from students.iiit.ac.in (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4R5k9hv006692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:16:09 +0530 Received: (from apache@localhost) by students.iiit.ac.in (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id o4R5k8Z6006690; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:16:08 +0530 X-Authentication-Warning: students.iiit.ac.in: apache set sender to vidur@localhost using -f Received: from 125.16.17.151 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user vidur) by students.iiit.ac.in with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:16:08 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <60655.125.16.17.151.1274939168.squirrel@students.iiit.ac.in> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:16:08 +0530 (IST) Subject: HDFS API's From: "Vidur Goyal" To: general@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 I was trying to run hdfs_test.c present in $HADOOP_HOME/src/c++/libhdfs directory of hadoop. I am facing problems running it properly. Can somebody guide me how to run it. vidur From general-return-1583-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 27 08:34:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70034 invoked from network); 27 May 2010 08:34:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 May 2010 08:34:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 25430 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 08:34:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25126 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 08:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25118 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2010 08:34:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 08:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.149.37] (HELO smtpout01s1.x-echo.com) (193.252.149.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 08:34:29 +0000 X-Spam-Level: Message-ID: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:40:36 +0200 From: Varene Olivier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Mapper Reducer : Unit Test and mocking with static variables Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Hello to all, first of all many thanks for this great piece of software you are all contributing to :) I am actually creating a program in Hadoop MapReduce, but I intend to massively use JUnit Tests to validate my code. To test a Mapper, I mock a Mapper.Context object and run the Mapper.map function with it, but inside my Mapper.map function, I am using Counters to maintain internal statistics. The update of those counters make the test fails with a null pointer (JavaNullPointerException). There is an issue "Counters" of variable visibility from my test ... Do you have any idea how to mock/validate/overcome this issue ? Thanks a lots Best Regards Olivier Varene : Code : -------- private static enum Counters {NBLINES}; private static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); private static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); // Mapper /** * outputs 1 for each line encountered */ public static class LCMapper extends Mapper { private final static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); private final static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); /** * for each line encountered outputs 1 for the key 1 */ public void map(LongWritable p_key, Text p_inputs, Context p_context) throws IOException, InterruptedException { p_context.getCounter(Counters.NBLINES).increment(1); p_context.write(one,oneL); } // end map } // end Mapper : Test : -------- @Test public void testLCMapper() throws IOException, InterruptedException { LCMapper mapper = new LCMapper(); Text value = new Text("ligneA\nlignB\n"); // mock the map job execution context Context context = mock(Context.class); try { mapper.map(null, value, context); } catch (NullPointerException e) { // exception raised by context.getCounter(...) null pointer // HOW TO MOCK ??? // Counter is a static enum from the englobing class ... // issue with variable visibility (from map function) in this test } // verify that the Mapper issued (one,oneL) pair verify(context).write(one,oneL); } // end testLCMapper From general-return-1584-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 27 16:07:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28872 invoked from network); 27 May 2010 16:07:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 May 2010 16:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 85701 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 16:07:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85637 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2010 16:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85629 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2010 16:07:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 16:07:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.149.37] (HELO smtpout01s1.x-echo.com) (193.252.149.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 16:06:55 +0000 X-Spam-Level: Message-ID: <4BFE9A0F.9010606@echo.fr> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:13:03 +0200 From: Varene Olivier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Mapper Reducer : Unit Test and mocking with static variables References: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> In-Reply-To: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 FYI I am on Hadoop 0.20.2, JUnit 4 Varene Olivier a écrit : > Hello to all, > > first of all many thanks for this great piece of software you are all > contributing to :) > > I am actually creating a program in Hadoop MapReduce, but I intend to > massively use JUnit Tests to validate my code. > > To test a Mapper, I mock a Mapper.Context object and run the Mapper.map > function with it, but inside my Mapper.map function, I am using Counters > to maintain internal statistics. The update of those counters make the > test fails with a null pointer (JavaNullPointerException). > There is an issue "Counters" of variable visibility from my test ... > > Do you have any idea how to mock/validate/overcome this issue ? > > > > Thanks a lots > Best Regards > Olivier Varene > > > : Code : > -------- > > private static enum Counters {NBLINES}; > private static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); > private static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); > > > // Mapper > /** > * outputs 1 for each line encountered > */ > public static class LCMapper extends > Mapper > { > private final static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); > private final static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); > /** > * for each line encountered outputs 1 for the key 1 > */ > public void map(LongWritable p_key, Text p_inputs, Context p_context) > throws IOException, InterruptedException > { > p_context.getCounter(Counters.NBLINES).increment(1); > p_context.write(one,oneL); > } // end map > } // end Mapper > > : Test : > -------- > > @Test > public void testLCMapper() throws IOException, InterruptedException > { > LCMapper mapper = new LCMapper(); > Text value = new Text("ligneA\nlignB\n"); > // mock the map job execution context > Context context = mock(Context.class); > try { > mapper.map(null, value, context); > } catch (NullPointerException e) > { > // exception raised by context.getCounter(...) null pointer > // HOW TO MOCK ??? > // Counter is a static enum from the englobing class ... > // issue with variable visibility (from map function) in this test > } > // verify that the Mapper issued (one,oneL) pair > verify(context).write(one,oneL); > > } // end testLCMapper > > From general-return-1585-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 00:13:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93933 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 00:13:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 00:13:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 56141 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 00:13:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56027 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 00:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56019 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 00:13:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:13:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:13:34 +0000 Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so382884pvf.35 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 17:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.188.30 with SMTP id q30mr8566067rvp.212.1275005593054; Thu, 27 May 2010 17:13:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.158.21 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 17:12:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFE9A0F.9010606@echo.fr> References: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> <4BFE9A0F.9010606@echo.fr> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:12:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mapper Reducer : Unit Test and mocking with static variables To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1720075ef4904879c5f9e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd1720075ef4904879c5f9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Varene, You might want to check out MRUnit. It's a unit test harness that contains mock objects for the context & other associated classes, and works with JUnit. It's included in the (unreleased) Hadoop 0.21, as well as Cloudera's Distribution for Hadoop. See http://archive.cloudera.com/docs/mrunit/index.html for MRUnit documentation= . Cheers, - Aaron On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Varene Olivier wrote: > FYI > I am on Hadoop 0.20.2, JUnit 4 > > > Varene Olivier a =E9crit : > > Hello to all, >> >> first of all many thanks for this great piece of software you are all >> contributing to :) >> >> I am actually creating a program in Hadoop MapReduce, but I intend to >> massively use JUnit Tests to validate my code. >> >> To test a Mapper, I mock a Mapper.Context object and run the Mapper.map >> function with it, but inside my Mapper.map function, I am using Counters >> to maintain internal statistics. The update of those counters make the t= est >> fails with a null pointer (JavaNullPointerException). >> There is an issue "Counters" of variable visibility from my test ... >> >> Do you have any idea how to mock/validate/overcome this issue ? >> >> >> >> Thanks a lots >> Best Regards >> Olivier Varene >> >> >> : Code : >> -------- >> >> private static enum Counters {NBLINES}; >> private static IntWritable one =3D new IntWritable(1); >> private static LongWritable oneL =3D new LongWritable(1); >> >> >> // Mapper >> /** >> * outputs 1 for each line encountered >> */ >> public static class LCMapper extends >> Mapper >> { >> private final static IntWritable one =3D new IntWritable(1); >> private final static LongWritable oneL =3D new LongWritable(1); >> /** >> * for each line encountered outputs 1 for the key 1 >> */ >> public void map(LongWritable p_key, Text p_inputs, Context p_context) >> throws IOException, InterruptedException >> { >> p_context.getCounter(Counters.NBLINES).increment(1); >> p_context.write(one,oneL); } // end map >> } // end Mapper >> >> : Test : >> -------- >> >> @Test >> public void testLCMapper() throws IOException, InterruptedException >> { LCMapper mapper =3D new LCMapper(); >> Text value =3D new Text("ligneA\nlignB\n"); >> // mock the map job execution context >> Context context =3D mock(Context.class); >> try { >> mapper.map(null, value, context); >> } catch (NullPointerException e) >> { >> // exception raised by context.getCounter(...) null pointer >> // HOW TO MOCK ??? >> // Counter is a static enum from the englobing class ... >> // issue with variable visibility (from map function) in this test >> } >> // verify that the Mapper issued (one,oneL) pair >> verify(context).write(one,oneL); >> } // end testLCMapper >> >> >> --000e0cd1720075ef4904879c5f9e-- From general-return-1586-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 00:59:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6776 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 00:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 00:59:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 93312 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 00:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93242 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 00:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93234 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 00:59:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:59:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Deepika.Khera@avg.com designates 193.85.188.248 as permitted sender) Received: from [193.85.188.248] (HELO ms.grisoft.cz) (193.85.188.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:59:26 +0000 Received: from phobos.cz.avg.com (unknown [192.168.200.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.grisoft.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5A6380D8 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 02:59:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from miranda.us.avg.com (10.32.34.13) by phobos.cz.avg.com (192.168.200.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 28 May 2010 02:59:05 +0200 Received: from miranda.us.avg.com ([10.32.34.13]) by miranda ([10.32.34.13]) with mapi; Thu, 27 May 2010 20:59:01 -0400 From: Deepika Khera To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:57:26 -0400 Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Topic: RE: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner Thread-Index: Acr8HGcv7YU8+mRFRRShjsHCpuhKbQALyO+QAG0jQRA= Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is just to close this one. I finally resolved my issue. Problem was th= at I had some enums in my key, the hash code of which is not constant over = JVMs. So instead of doing myEnum.hashCode(), I should have first converted = it to a string and then taken the hashcode (like myEnum.name().hashCode()).= I was relying on a correct hashCode() method, since the IDE had generated = it for me. I just had to be careful for my case. Thanks for all the help! Deepika -----Original Message----- From: Deepika Khera [mailto:Deepika.Khera@avg.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:03 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: RE: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner So I ran my process again with some more logging and here is what I see.=20 I used my own HashPartitioner(basically copied hadoop's partitioner and add= ed some logging for analysis).I printed here the Key and the reducer that i= s assigned to the key (based on the hash code).=20 My process triggered off 2 mappers (running on 2 different hadoop machines)= , hence both of these try to find reducers for the split file assigned to t= hem. I see that for a same object key assigned to both these mappers, I am = getting 2 different reducers allocated by the Partitioner. In the reducers I see - 1) 2 different reducers (the ones that the partitioner assigned the key to)= printing out the same Key (I did not print out the value as I thought that= wouldn't matter) 2) Here are the logs from where reducers copies data from the mapper - =09 Reducer1: 2010-05-25 11:34:49,810 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1002= 612 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 2010-05-25 11:34:49,831 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 -> (127, 36) from hadoop-49.c.a.com 2010-05-25 11:34:50,797 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000006_0: Got 1 new map-outputs 2010-05-25 11:34:54,835 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000006_0 Scheduled 1 outputs (0 slow hosts and0 dup host= s) 2010-05-25 11:34:54,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: header: a= ttempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0, compressed len: 1553902, decompressed = len: 1553898 2010-05-25 11:34:54,841 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Shuffling= 1553898 bytes (1553902 raw bytes) into RAM from attempt_201005251129_0001_= m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,924 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1553= 898 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,944 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 -> (143, 36) from hadoop-25.c.a.com Reducer2:=20 =20 2010-05-25 11:34:49,822 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 6376= 57 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 2010-05-25 11:34:49,911 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000001_0 -> (125, 36) from hadoop-49.c.a.com 2010-05-25 11:34:50,806 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000008_0: Got 1 new map-outputs 2010-05-25 11:34:54,915 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: attempt_2= 01005251129_0001_r_000008_0 Scheduled 1 outputs (0 slow hosts and0 dup host= s) 2010-05-25 11:34:54,920 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: header: a= ttempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0, compressed len: 1462335, decompressed = len: 1462331 2010-05-25 11:34:54,920 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Shuffling= 1462331 bytes (1462335 raw bytes) into RAM from attempt_201005251129_0001_= m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,937 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Read 1462= 331 bytes from map-output for attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 2010-05-25 11:34:54,937 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.ReduceTask: Rec #1 fr= om attempt_201005251129_0001_m_000000_0 -> (147, 36) from hadoop-25.c.a.com The 2 reduce tasks have different task ids and belong to the same job. Thanks, Deepika -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sammer [mailto:esammer@cloudera.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:10 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: Hash Partitioner On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Deepika Khera wrot= e: > Thanks for your response Eric. > > I am using hadoop 0.20.2. > > Here is what the hashCode() implementation looks like (I actually had the= IDE generate it for me) > > Main key (for mapper & reducer): > > public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aKey !=3D null ? aKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (gKey !=3D null ? gKey.hashCode()= : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (int) (date ^ (date >>> 32)); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (ma !=3D null ? ma.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (cl !=3D null ? cl.hashCode() : 0= ); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > > > aKey : AKey class > > > =A0 =A0public int hashCode() { > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0int result =3D kVersion; > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (v !=3D null ? v.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (s !=3D null ? s.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (o !=3D null ? o.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (l !=3D null ? l.hashCode() : 0); > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (e ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (li ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0result =3D 31 * result + (aut ? 1 : 0); //boolean > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return result; > =A0 =A0} > Both of these look fine, assuming all the other hashCode()s return the same value every time. > When this happens, I do see the same values for the key. Also I am not us= ing a grouping comparator. So you see two reduce methods getting the same key with the same values? That's extremely odd. If this is the case, there's a bug in Hadoop. Can you find the relevant logs from the reducers where Hadoop fetches the map output? Does it look like its fetching the same output twice? Do the two tasks where you see the duplicates have the same task ID? Can you confirm the reduce tasks are from the same job ID for us? > I was wondering since the call to HashPartitioner.getPartition() is done = from a map task, several of which are running on different machines, is it = possible that they get a different hashcode and hence get different reducer= s assigned even when the key is the same. The hashCode() result should *always* be the same given the same internal state. In other words, it should be consistent and stable. If I have a string new String("hello world") it will always have the exact same hashCode(). If this isn't true, you will get wildly unpredictable results not just with Hadoop but with Java's comparators, collections, etc. --=20 Eric Sammer phone: +1-917-287-2675 twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com From general-return-1587-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 06:32:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1034 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 06:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 06:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12166 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 06:32:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11841 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 06:32:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11832 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 06:32:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:32:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.149.37] (HELO smtpout01s1.x-echo.com) (193.252.149.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:32:05 +0000 X-Spam-Level: Message-ID: <4BFF64D6.6010409@echo.fr> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 08:38:14 +0200 From: Varene Olivier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Mapper Reducer : Unit Test and mocking with static variables References: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> <4BFE9A0F.9010606@echo.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Thanks a lot Aaron, I was looking into it, I just hope, it will be compliant with 0.20.2 ... Otherwise, I am stuck :( Cheers Olivier Aaron Kimball a écrit : > Varene, > > You might want to check out MRUnit. It's a unit test harness that contains > mock objects for the context & other associated classes, and works with > JUnit. > > It's included in the (unreleased) Hadoop 0.21, as well as Cloudera's > Distribution for Hadoop. See > http://archive.cloudera.com/docs/mrunit/index.html for MRUnit documentation. > > Cheers, > - Aaron > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Varene Olivier wrote: > >> FYI >> I am on Hadoop 0.20.2, JUnit 4 >> >> >> Varene Olivier a écrit : >> >> Hello to all, >>> first of all many thanks for this great piece of software you are all >>> contributing to :) >>> >>> I am actually creating a program in Hadoop MapReduce, but I intend to >>> massively use JUnit Tests to validate my code. >>> >>> To test a Mapper, I mock a Mapper.Context object and run the Mapper.map >>> function with it, but inside my Mapper.map function, I am using Counters >>> to maintain internal statistics. The update of those counters make the test >>> fails with a null pointer (JavaNullPointerException). >>> There is an issue "Counters" of variable visibility from my test ... >>> >>> Do you have any idea how to mock/validate/overcome this issue ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks a lots >>> Best Regards >>> Olivier Varene >>> >>> >>> : Code : >>> -------- >>> >>> private static enum Counters {NBLINES}; >>> private static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); >>> private static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); >>> >>> >>> // Mapper >>> /** >>> * outputs 1 for each line encountered >>> */ >>> public static class LCMapper extends >>> Mapper >>> { >>> private final static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); >>> private final static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); >>> /** >>> * for each line encountered outputs 1 for the key 1 >>> */ >>> public void map(LongWritable p_key, Text p_inputs, Context p_context) >>> throws IOException, InterruptedException >>> { >>> p_context.getCounter(Counters.NBLINES).increment(1); >>> p_context.write(one,oneL); } // end map >>> } // end Mapper >>> >>> : Test : >>> -------- >>> >>> @Test >>> public void testLCMapper() throws IOException, InterruptedException >>> { LCMapper mapper = new LCMapper(); >>> Text value = new Text("ligneA\nlignB\n"); >>> // mock the map job execution context >>> Context context = mock(Context.class); >>> try { >>> mapper.map(null, value, context); >>> } catch (NullPointerException e) >>> { >>> // exception raised by context.getCounter(...) null pointer >>> // HOW TO MOCK ??? >>> // Counter is a static enum from the englobing class ... >>> // issue with variable visibility (from map function) in this test >>> } >>> // verify that the Mapper issued (one,oneL) pair >>> verify(context).write(one,oneL); >>> } // end testLCMapper >>> >>> >>> > From general-return-1588-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 12:48:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94073 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 12:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 12:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 80458 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 12:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80344 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 12:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80336 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 12:48:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 12:48:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,TO_NO_BRKTS_DIRECT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.149.37] (HELO smtpout01s1.x-echo.com) (193.252.149.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 12:48:50 +0000 X-Spam-Level: Message-ID: <4BFFBD26.10700@echo.fr> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:55:02 +0200 From: Varene Olivier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Mapper Reducer : Unit Test and mocking with static variables References: <4BFE3004.5000603@echo.fr> <4BFE9A0F.9010606@echo.fr> <4BFF64D6.6010409@echo.fr> In-Reply-To: <4BFF64D6.6010409@echo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 FYI MRUnit is the way to go and it is compatible (as far as I am aware of) with the 0.20.2 Cheers Olivier Varene Olivier a écrit : > Thanks a lot Aaron, > > I was looking into it, I just hope, it will be compliant with 0.20.2 ... > > Otherwise, I am stuck :( > > Cheers > Olivier > > Aaron Kimball a écrit : >> Varene, >> >> You might want to check out MRUnit. It's a unit test harness that >> contains >> mock objects for the context & other associated classes, and works with >> JUnit. >> >> It's included in the (unreleased) Hadoop 0.21, as well as Cloudera's >> Distribution for Hadoop. See >> http://archive.cloudera.com/docs/mrunit/index.html for MRUnit >> documentation. >> >> Cheers, >> - Aaron >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Varene Olivier wrote: >> >>> FYI >>> I am on Hadoop 0.20.2, JUnit 4 >>> >>> >>> Varene Olivier a écrit : >>> >>> Hello to all, >>>> first of all many thanks for this great piece of software you are all >>>> contributing to :) >>>> >>>> I am actually creating a program in Hadoop MapReduce, but I intend to >>>> massively use JUnit Tests to validate my code. >>>> >>>> To test a Mapper, I mock a Mapper.Context object and run the Mapper.map >>>> function with it, but inside my Mapper.map function, I am using >>>> Counters >>>> to maintain internal statistics. The update of those counters make >>>> the test >>>> fails with a null pointer (JavaNullPointerException). >>>> There is an issue "Counters" of variable visibility from my test ... >>>> >>>> Do you have any idea how to mock/validate/overcome this issue ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks a lots >>>> Best Regards >>>> Olivier Varene >>>> >>>> >>>> : Code : >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> private static enum Counters {NBLINES}; >>>> private static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); >>>> private static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); >>>> >>>> >>>> // Mapper >>>> /** >>>> * outputs 1 for each line encountered >>>> */ >>>> public static class LCMapper extends >>>> Mapper >>>> { >>>> private final static IntWritable one = new IntWritable(1); >>>> private final static LongWritable oneL = new LongWritable(1); >>>> /** >>>> * for each line encountered outputs 1 for the key 1 >>>> */ >>>> public void map(LongWritable p_key, Text p_inputs, Context p_context) >>>> throws IOException, InterruptedException >>>> { >>>> p_context.getCounter(Counters.NBLINES).increment(1); >>>> p_context.write(one,oneL); } // end map >>>> } // end Mapper >>>> >>>> : Test : >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> @Test >>>> public void testLCMapper() throws IOException, InterruptedException >>>> { LCMapper mapper = new LCMapper(); >>>> Text value = new Text("ligneA\nlignB\n"); >>>> // mock the map job execution context >>>> Context context = mock(Context.class); >>>> try { >>>> mapper.map(null, value, context); >>>> } catch (NullPointerException e) >>>> { >>>> // exception raised by context.getCounter(...) null pointer >>>> // HOW TO MOCK ??? >>>> // Counter is a static enum from the englobing class ... >>>> // issue with variable visibility (from map function) in this test >>>> } >>>> // verify that the Mapper issued (one,oneL) pair >>>> verify(context).write(one,oneL); >>>> } // end testLCMapper >>>> >>>> >>>> >> From general-return-1589-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 21:30:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54071 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 21:29:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 21:29:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11679 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 21:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11436 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 21:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34952 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 23:51:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robotics@students.iiit.ac.in designates 121.242.23.201 as permitted sender) Message-Id: <201005262351.o4QNpHtY002366@students.iiit.ac.in> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1646007950==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: IIIT-H Robotics To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 04:48:01 +0530 Subject: Reg: Embedded Systems Workshop for Robotic Applications and System Engineering by IIIT- Hyderabad on 28th/ 29th/30th May X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on students.iiit.ac.in X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, MISSING_MID autolearn=no version=3.2.5 --===============1646007950== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Greetings from IIIT, Hyderabad, We are delighted to inform you that IIIT-H is proudly conducting the first ever nationwide Workshop on Embedded Systems and its application in Robotics and System Engineering. This event begins from May 28th in IIIT-Hyderabad. The workshop would cover a wide range of topics right from the beginners level to an advanced stage. The topics include but are not limited to FPGAs, Microcontrollers and Programmable Logic Controllers which can be used to design various System Engineering Aspects and robotic applications . We will be covering the tools and system concepts of ATMEL AVR Microcontrollers and Xilinx, Altera FPGAs. This one day event is tuned to industry requirements and aims to provide you with knowledge which would be valuable in the practical sphere for a corporate job in the Semiconductor and IT Industry. Registration Process The workshop will be conducted in IIIT-H Campus on 28th , 29th and 30th of May. Students can register on our webpage : http://web.iiit.ac.in/~robotics/EW2010/register.html for a preferred date or come on the day of the Event and register onsite. Registration Fees : Rs 399 /- Program Schedule on the Day of Event 10 AM - 11 AM : On-campus Registration and Fees Collection 11 AM - 12:30 PM : Lecture on FPGAs and Using Custom Toolkits with Demonstrations. 30 min Break 1 PM - 2:30 PM : Lecture on Micro controllers and Demos in robotic applications. 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM : Brain-Storming Session 3:30 PM - 4:00 PM : Distribution of Participation Certificates Who to Contact Please visit our page http://web.iiit.ac.in/~robotics/EW2010 for more details or please contact Mr. Jairaj Bhattacharya at +91 9989020007 or Mr. Shashank Pandey at +91 9000405901. We look forward to meeting you and your students at the EW2010. Best Regards, Embedded Robotics Team IIIT-H has been ranked among the Best 7 Universities in South Asia, in terms of .scholarly papers. on the Internet, in the latest ranking, by Cybermetric Lab, Spain.s largest public research institution. (Oct 2009) --===============1646007950==-- From general-return-1590-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 28 21:41:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55910 invoked from network); 28 May 2010 21:41:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 May 2010 21:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20650 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 21:41:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20594 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2010 21:41:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20586 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2010 21:41:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:41:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:40:56 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P7ay1e00517dt5G589gcm5; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:40:36 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P9gS1e00J2SbwD53Z9gVN0; Fri, 28 May 2010 21:40:34 +0000 Message-Id: <9DD2220F-023D-4E6B-88C5-F08B184B6102@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-422882174 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Last call: ApacheCon TechTalks CFP closes today Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:40:25 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-4-422882174 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, As a reminder the CFP for proposals closes today. The CFP is at = http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/date/20100428 -- Owen ApacheCon North America 2010 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta Technical Tracks: Call For Participation All submissions must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 at midnight =20 Pacific Time. The official conference, trainings, and expo of The Apache Software =20 Foundation (ASF) returns to Atlanta this November, with dozens of =20 technical, business, and community-focused sessions at the beginner, =20 intermediate, and advanced levels. Over the past decade, the ASF has gone from strength to strength, =20 developing and shepherding nearly 150 Top-Level Projects and new =20 initiatives in the Apache Incubator and Labs. This year's ApacheCon =20 celebrates how Apache technologies have sparked creativity, challenged =20= processes, streamlined development, improved collaboration, launched =20 businesses, bolstered economies, and improved lives. We are proud of our achievements and recognize that the global Apache =20= community --both developers and users-- are responsible for the =20 success and popularity of our products. The ApacheCon Planning Team are soliciting 50-minute technical =20 presentations for the next conference, which will focus on the theme =20 =93Servers, the Cloud, and Innovation=94. We are particularly interested in highly-relevant, professionally-=20 directed presentations that demonstrate specific probrlems and real-=20 world solutions. Part of the technical program has already been =20 planned; we welcome proposals based on the following Apache Projects =20 and related technical areas: - Cassandra/NoSQL - Content Technologies - (Java) Enterprise Development - Felix/OSGi - Geronimo - Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing - Lucene, Mahout + friends/Search - Tomcat - Tuscany Submissions are open to anyone with relevant expertise: ASF =20 affiliation is not required to present at, attend, or otherwise =20 participate in ApacheCon. Please keep in mind that whilst we encourage submissions that the =20 highlight the use of specific Apache solutions, we are unable to =20 accept marketing/commercially-oriented presentations. Other proposals, such as panels, or those longer than 50 minutes in =20 duration have been considered in the past. You are welcome to submit =20 an alternate presentation, however, such sessions are accepted under =20 exceptional circumstances. Please be as descriptive as possible, =20 including names/bios of proposed panelists and any related details. All accepted speakers (not co-presenters) qualify for general =20 conference admission and a minimum of two nights lodging at the =20 conference hotel. Additional hotel nights and travel assistance are =20 possible, depending on the number of presentations given and type of =20 assistance needed. To submit a presentation proposal, please send an email to submissions =20= AT apachecon DOT com containing the following information in plaintext =20= (no attachments, please): 1. Your full name, title, and organization 2. Contact information, including your address 3. The name of your proposed session (keep your title simple and =20 relevant to the topic) 4. The technical category of the intended presentation (Cassandra/=20 NoSQL; Content Technologies; (Java) Enterprise Development; Felix/=20 OSGi; Geronimo; Hadoop + friends/Cloud Computing; Lucene, Mahout + =20 friends/Search; Tomcat; or Tuscany) 5. The classification for each presentation (Servers, Cloud, or =20 Innovation) =96 some presentations may have more than one theme (e.g., a = =20 next-generation server can be classified both as "Servers" and =20 "Innovation" 6. The intended audience level (beginner, intermediate, advanced) 7. A 75-200 word overview of your presentation 8. A 100-200-word speaker bio that includes prior conference speaking =20= or related experience 9. Feedback or references (with contact information) on presentations =20= given within the last three years To be considered, proposals must be received by Friday, 28 May 2010 at =20= midnight Pacific Time. Please email any questions regarding proposal =20 submissions to cfp AT apachecon DOT com. Technical Tracks Key Dates 23 April 2010: Call For Participation Open 28 May 2010: Call For Participation Closes 11 June 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection Notification 1-5 November 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! For the ApacheCon Planning team, Sally Khudairi, Program Lead --Apple-Mail-4-422882174-- From general-return-1591-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 29 00:37:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97539 invoked from network); 29 May 2010 00:37:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 May 2010 00:37:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 37884 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 00:37:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37813 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 00:37:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37805 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2010 00:37:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 00:37:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1433.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 00:37:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 97425 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2010 00:37:09 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 00:37:09 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so1791963gwj.35 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.148.143 with SMTP id p15mr1325614ibv.15.1275093426440; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.148.65 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:37:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Contributor Meeting Minutes 05/28/2010 From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This month, the MapReduce + HDFS contributor meeting was held at Cloudera Headquarters. Announcements for contributor meetings are here: http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/ Minutes follow. No decisions were made at this meeting, but the following issues were discussed and may presage future discussion and decisions on these lists. Eli, I think you have all the slides. Would you mind sending them out? -C == 0.21 release update == * Continuing to close blockers, ping people for updates and suggestions * About 20 open blockers. Many are MapReduce documentation that may be pushed. Speak up if 0.21 is missing anything substantive. * Common/HDFS visibility and annotations are close to consensus; MapReduce annotations are committed to trunk and the 0.21 branch == HEP proposal == (what follows is the sketch presented at the meeting. A full proposal with concrete details will be circulated on the list) * Based on- and very similar to- the PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) Process * Audience is HDFS and MapReduce; not necessarily adopted by other subprojects - Addresses the perception that there is friction between innovation/experimentation and stability * Not for small enhancements, features, and bug fixes. This should not slow down typical development or impede casual contribution to Hadoop * Primary mechanism for new features, collecting input, documenting design decisions * JIRA is good for details, but not for deciding on wide shifts in direction * Purpose is for author to build consensus and gather dissenting opinions. - All may comment, but Editors will review incoming HEP material - Editors determine only whether the HEP is complete, not whether they believe it is a sound idea - Editors are appointed by the PMC - Mechanism for appointing Editors and term of service TBD - Apache Board appoints Shepherds for projects somewhat randomly, to projects. A similar mechanism could work for incoming HEPs - Proposal *may* come with code, but not necessarily. Drafting/baking of the HEP occurs in public on a list dedicated to that particular proposal. Once Editors certify the HEP as complete, it is sent to general@ for wider discussion. - The discussion phase begins on general@. The mailing list exists to ensure the HEP is complete enough to present to the community. - Some discussion on the difference between posting to general@ and posting to the HEP list. Completeness is, of course, subjective. If the Editor and Author disagree whether the proposal affects an aspect of the framework enough to merit special consideration, it is not entirely clear how to resolve the disagreement. - In general, the role of the Editor in the community-driven process of Hadoop is not entirely clear. It may be possible to optimize it out. - Once discussion ends, the HEP is passed (or fails to pass) by a vote of the PMC (mechanics undefined). In Python, the result is committed to the repository. A similar practice would make sense in Hadoop. * Which issues require HEPs? - Discussion ranged. Append, backup namenode, edit log rewrite, et al. were examples of features substantial enough to merit a HEP. Pure Java CRC is an example of an enhancement that would not. Whether an explicit process must be in place to determine whether an issue requires a HEP is not clear. - Viewing HEPs as a way of soliciting consensus for an approach might be more accurate. Going through the HEP process should always improve the chances of a successful proposal * Evaluation - The proposal may be rejected if it is redundant with existing functionality, technically unsound, insufficiently motivated, no backwards compatibility story, etc. - Implementation is not necessary, and is lightly discouraged. Feedback is less welcome once code is in hand. - Purpose is to be clear about the acceptance criteria for that issue, e.g. concerns that the proposal may not scale or may harm performance - Dissenting opinions must be recorded accurately. Quoting would be a safe practice for the Author to encourage HEP reviewers not to block the product of the proposal. * The testing burden and completion strategy may be ambiguous - Whether the proposal affects scalability may not be testable by the implementer. Completing the proposal to address all use cases may require considerably more work than the Author is willing or motivated to invest. - The HEP discussion on general@ should explore whether such objections are merited and reasonable. For example, a particularly obscure/esoteric use case could be included as a condition for acceptance if the dissenter is willing to invest the resources to test/validate it. The process is flexible in this regard. - But it is not infinitely flexible. Backwards compatibility, performance regression, availability, and other considerations need not be called out in every HEP. - Traditional concerns need to be documented. Acceptance criteria should ideally be automated and reproducible in different organizations == Branching == * A patch and a branch are isomorphic from a policy perspective. Of course, they are functionally distinct: branches are easier to collaborate on and are, generally, longer-lived than are patches. But special policies need not be derived to account for these differences, which concern the production of the code, not its review and acceptance. * Some developers find branches to be easier to review than very large patches and easier to merge, given a toolchain that supports this. - Subversion currently is difficult to adapt to this model - Could be done on a HEP-by-HEP basis, as a condition for acceptance * Eclipse Labs - Branded version of Google Code (same functionality, w/ Eclipse brand) - Not official Eclipse projects, but associated with Eclipse - Apache/Hadoop may consider a similar strategy - Distinct from Apache Labs, as one need not be a committer, follow its rules for releases, etc. == Contrib == * Modules (such as fuse-dfs) are not actively maintained in the main repository and would benefit from a release schedule decoupled from the rest of Hadoop * With few exceptions, the contrib modules have smaller, often discrete groups of maintainers. It may be worth exploring whether these projects could live elsewhere From general-return-1592-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 29 03:00:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26777 invoked from network); 29 May 2010 03:00:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 May 2010 03:00:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 14507 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 03:00:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14274 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 03:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14253 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2010 03:00:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 03:00:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 03:00:01 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so1282011pzk.2 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 19:59:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.27 with SMTP id c27mr832661wfj.65.1275101980955; Fri, 28 May 2010 19:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 19:59:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:59:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributor Meeting Minutes 05/28/2010 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636e1f7aca0939c0487b2d0e3 --001636e1f7aca0939c0487b2d0e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Slides attached. Thanks for taking notes Chris! On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > This month, the MapReduce + HDFS contributor meeting was held at > Cloudera Headquarters. > > Announcements for contributor meetings are here: > http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/ > > Minutes follow. No decisions were made at this meeting, but the > following issues were discussed and may presage future discussion and > decisions on these lists. > > Eli, I think you have all the slides. Would you mind sending them out? -C > > =3D=3D 0.21 release update =3D=3D > * Continuing to close blockers, ping people for updates and suggestions > * About 20 open blockers. Many are MapReduce documentation that may be > pushed. Speak up if 0.21 is missing anything substantive. > * Common/HDFS visibility and annotations are close to consensus; > MapReduce annotations are committed to trunk and the 0.21 branch > > =3D=3D HEP proposal =3D=3D > (what follows is the sketch presented at the meeting. A full proposal > with concrete details will be circulated on the list) > > * Based on- and very similar to- the PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) Pr= ocess > * Audience is HDFS and MapReduce; not necessarily adopted by other subpro= jects > =A0- Addresses the perception that there is friction between > innovation/experimentation and stability > * Not for small enhancements, features, and bug fixes. This should not > slow down typical development or impede casual contribution to Hadoop > * Primary mechanism for new features, collecting input, documenting > design decisions > * JIRA is good for details, but not for deciding on wide shifts in direct= ion > * Purpose is for author to build consensus and gather dissenting opinions= . > =A0- All may comment, but Editors will review incoming HEP material > =A0- Editors determine only whether the HEP is complete, not whether > they believe it is a sound idea > =A0- Editors are appointed by the PMC > =A0- Mechanism for appointing Editors and term of service TBD > =A0 =A0- Apache Board appoints Shepherds for projects somewhat randomly, > to projects. A similar mechanism could work for incoming HEPs > =A0- Proposal *may* come with code, but not necessarily. > Drafting/baking of the HEP occurs in public on a list dedicated to > that particular proposal. Once Editors certify the HEP as complete, it > is sent to general@ for wider discussion. > =A0 =A0- The discussion phase begins on general@. The mailing list exists > to ensure the HEP is complete enough to present to the community. > =A0- Some discussion on the difference between posting to general@ and > posting to the HEP list. Completeness is, of course, subjective. If > the Editor and Author disagree whether the proposal affects an aspect > of the framework enough to merit special consideration, it is not > entirely clear how to resolve the disagreement. > =A0 =A0- In general, the role of the Editor in the community-driven > process of Hadoop is not entirely clear. It may be possible to > optimize it out. > =A0- Once discussion ends, the HEP is passed (or fails to pass) by a > vote of the PMC (mechanics undefined). In Python, the result is > committed to the repository. A similar practice would make sense in > Hadoop. > * Which issues require HEPs? > =A0- Discussion ranged. Append, backup namenode, edit log rewrite, et > al. were examples of features substantial enough to merit a HEP. Pure > Java CRC is an example of an enhancement that would not. Whether an > explicit process must be in place to determine whether an issue > requires a HEP is not clear. > =A0- Viewing HEPs as a way of soliciting consensus for an approach > might be more accurate. Going through the HEP process should always > improve the chances of a successful proposal > > * Evaluation > =A0- The proposal may be rejected if it is redundant with existing > functionality, technically unsound, insufficiently motivated, no > backwards compatibility story, etc. > =A0- Implementation is not necessary, and is lightly discouraged. > Feedback is less welcome once code is in hand. > =A0- Purpose is to be clear about the acceptance criteria for that > issue, e.g. concerns that the proposal may not scale or may harm > performance > =A0- Dissenting opinions must be recorded accurately. Quoting would be > a safe practice for the Author to encourage HEP reviewers not to block > the product of the proposal. > > * The testing burden and completion strategy may be ambiguous > =A0- Whether the proposal affects scalability may not be testable by > the implementer. Completing the proposal to address all use cases may > require considerably more work than the Author is willing or motivated > to invest. > =A0- The HEP discussion on general@ should explore whether such > objections are merited and reasonable. For example, a particularly > obscure/esoteric use case could be included as a condition for > acceptance if the dissenter is willing to invest the resources to > test/validate it. The process is flexible in this regard. > =A0 =A0- But it is not infinitely flexible. Backwards compatibility, > performance regression, availability, and other considerations need > not be called out in every HEP. > =A0 =A0- Traditional concerns need to be documented. Acceptance criteria > should ideally be automated and reproducible in different > organizations > > =3D=3D Branching =3D=3D > * A patch and a branch are isomorphic from a policy perspective. Of > course, they are functionally distinct: branches are easier to > collaborate on and are, generally, longer-lived than are patches. But > special policies need not be derived to account for these differences, > which concern the production of the code, not its review and > acceptance. > * Some developers find branches to be easier to review than very large > patches and easier to merge, given a toolchain that supports this. > =A0- Subversion currently is difficult to adapt to this model > =A0- Could be done on a HEP-by-HEP basis, as a condition for acceptance > * Eclipse Labs > =A0- Branded version of Google Code (same functionality, w/ Eclipse brand= ) > =A0- Not official Eclipse projects, but associated with Eclipse > =A0- Apache/Hadoop may consider a similar strategy > =A0- Distinct from Apache Labs, as one need not be a committer, follow > its rules for releases, etc. > > =3D=3D Contrib =3D=3D > * Modules (such as fuse-dfs) are not actively maintained in the main > repository and would benefit from a release schedule decoupled from > the rest of Hadoop > * With few exceptions, the contrib modules have smaller, often > discrete groups of maintainers. It may be worth exploring whether > these projects could live elsewhere > --001636e1f7aca0939c0487b2d0e3-- From general-return-1593-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 29 06:20:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64403 invoked from network); 29 May 2010 06:20:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 May 2010 06:20:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 62851 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 06:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62503 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 06:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62482 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2010 06:20:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:20:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:20:02 +0000 Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so1314042pwj.35 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:19:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.210.17 with SMTP id i17mr972778wfg.83.1275113981744; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.16.21 with HTTP; Fri, 28 May 2010 23:19:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 23:19:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributor Meeting Minutes 05/28/2010 From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The list stripped my slides. Posted notes to the wiki, which doesn't seem to allow attachments so not sure where to put slides. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopContributorsMeeting20100528 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Slides attached. =A0Thanks for taking notes Chris! > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Chris Douglas wrot= e: >> This month, the MapReduce + HDFS contributor meeting was held at >> Cloudera Headquarters. >> >> Announcements for contributor meetings are here: >> http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/ >> >> Minutes follow. No decisions were made at this meeting, but the >> following issues were discussed and may presage future discussion and >> decisions on these lists. >> >> Eli, I think you have all the slides. Would you mind sending them out? -= C >> >> =3D=3D 0.21 release update =3D=3D >> * Continuing to close blockers, ping people for updates and suggestions >> * About 20 open blockers. Many are MapReduce documentation that may be >> pushed. Speak up if 0.21 is missing anything substantive. >> * Common/HDFS visibility and annotations are close to consensus; >> MapReduce annotations are committed to trunk and the 0.21 branch >> >> =3D=3D HEP proposal =3D=3D >> (what follows is the sketch presented at the meeting. A full proposal >> with concrete details will be circulated on the list) >> >> * Based on- and very similar to- the PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) P= rocess >> * Audience is HDFS and MapReduce; not necessarily adopted by other subpr= ojects >> =A0- Addresses the perception that there is friction between >> innovation/experimentation and stability >> * Not for small enhancements, features, and bug fixes. This should not >> slow down typical development or impede casual contribution to Hadoop >> * Primary mechanism for new features, collecting input, documenting >> design decisions >> * JIRA is good for details, but not for deciding on wide shifts in direc= tion >> * Purpose is for author to build consensus and gather dissenting opinion= s. >> =A0- All may comment, but Editors will review incoming HEP material >> =A0- Editors determine only whether the HEP is complete, not whether >> they believe it is a sound idea >> =A0- Editors are appointed by the PMC >> =A0- Mechanism for appointing Editors and term of service TBD >> =A0 =A0- Apache Board appoints Shepherds for projects somewhat randomly, >> to projects. A similar mechanism could work for incoming HEPs >> =A0- Proposal *may* come with code, but not necessarily. >> Drafting/baking of the HEP occurs in public on a list dedicated to >> that particular proposal. Once Editors certify the HEP as complete, it >> is sent to general@ for wider discussion. >> =A0 =A0- The discussion phase begins on general@. The mailing list exist= s >> to ensure the HEP is complete enough to present to the community. >> =A0- Some discussion on the difference between posting to general@ and >> posting to the HEP list. Completeness is, of course, subjective. If >> the Editor and Author disagree whether the proposal affects an aspect >> of the framework enough to merit special consideration, it is not >> entirely clear how to resolve the disagreement. >> =A0 =A0- In general, the role of the Editor in the community-driven >> process of Hadoop is not entirely clear. It may be possible to >> optimize it out. >> =A0- Once discussion ends, the HEP is passed (or fails to pass) by a >> vote of the PMC (mechanics undefined). In Python, the result is >> committed to the repository. A similar practice would make sense in >> Hadoop. >> * Which issues require HEPs? >> =A0- Discussion ranged. Append, backup namenode, edit log rewrite, et >> al. were examples of features substantial enough to merit a HEP. Pure >> Java CRC is an example of an enhancement that would not. Whether an >> explicit process must be in place to determine whether an issue >> requires a HEP is not clear. >> =A0- Viewing HEPs as a way of soliciting consensus for an approach >> might be more accurate. Going through the HEP process should always >> improve the chances of a successful proposal >> >> * Evaluation >> =A0- The proposal may be rejected if it is redundant with existing >> functionality, technically unsound, insufficiently motivated, no >> backwards compatibility story, etc. >> =A0- Implementation is not necessary, and is lightly discouraged. >> Feedback is less welcome once code is in hand. >> =A0- Purpose is to be clear about the acceptance criteria for that >> issue, e.g. concerns that the proposal may not scale or may harm >> performance >> =A0- Dissenting opinions must be recorded accurately. Quoting would be >> a safe practice for the Author to encourage HEP reviewers not to block >> the product of the proposal. >> >> * The testing burden and completion strategy may be ambiguous >> =A0- Whether the proposal affects scalability may not be testable by >> the implementer. Completing the proposal to address all use cases may >> require considerably more work than the Author is willing or motivated >> to invest. >> =A0- The HEP discussion on general@ should explore whether such >> objections are merited and reasonable. For example, a particularly >> obscure/esoteric use case could be included as a condition for >> acceptance if the dissenter is willing to invest the resources to >> test/validate it. The process is flexible in this regard. >> =A0 =A0- But it is not infinitely flexible. Backwards compatibility, >> performance regression, availability, and other considerations need >> not be called out in every HEP. >> =A0 =A0- Traditional concerns need to be documented. Acceptance criteria >> should ideally be automated and reproducible in different >> organizations >> >> =3D=3D Branching =3D=3D >> * A patch and a branch are isomorphic from a policy perspective. Of >> course, they are functionally distinct: branches are easier to >> collaborate on and are, generally, longer-lived than are patches. But >> special policies need not be derived to account for these differences, >> which concern the production of the code, not its review and >> acceptance. >> * Some developers find branches to be easier to review than very large >> patches and easier to merge, given a toolchain that supports this. >> =A0- Subversion currently is difficult to adapt to this model >> =A0- Could be done on a HEP-by-HEP basis, as a condition for acceptance >> * Eclipse Labs >> =A0- Branded version of Google Code (same functionality, w/ Eclipse bran= d) >> =A0- Not official Eclipse projects, but associated with Eclipse >> =A0- Apache/Hadoop may consider a similar strategy >> =A0- Distinct from Apache Labs, as one need not be a committer, follow >> its rules for releases, etc. >> >> =3D=3D Contrib =3D=3D >> * Modules (such as fuse-dfs) are not actively maintained in the main >> repository and would benefit from a release schedule decoupled from >> the rest of Hadoop >> * With few exceptions, the contrib modules have smaller, often >> discrete groups of maintainers. It may be worth exploring whether >> these projects could live elsewhere >> > From general-return-1594-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 29 06:43:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72700 invoked from network); 29 May 2010 06:43:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 May 2010 06:43:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 70848 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 06:43:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70735 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2010 06:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17582 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2010 03:04:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deepakmca05@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=XsvQ4UbJ+j5ivZnXoQ+IYGkTj3z92eLAyE9T8OfaQy4=; b=GJJIxVmEWhlMibFT+gapMCpngGbcfsWtMS7czUIFLyj+Nbh4hOK5VP45yqzkqFczeD NlNKx7B8MqIcE85ZHfhDaMG2sy95AgMpy3LWAab4zMZWKXLLkxtNaNaVO/JhhAe7Y/dD 7nIdxShvvoci+dZl5Arh8/xxfVg16DdEflsW8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=omqfn+ij5lmo9XtxKljaS+uCta0+/2WlYDI9ZdopDYYz+CCuTBvw/NOIFMo2nFts+I OiWyjOnhAFZCbAzSWHWYRbkSvBtxk13/JplZ1BtEKsA7qAyrGLODAUGXM/Cf8sfUL8Wp Q96wJhbjbwNQ/OfwAYEzOSFfipkf08v3ctX5c= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Deepak Sharma Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 08:33:35 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributor Meeting Minutes 05/28/2010 To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org, hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9360c84e310487b2df52 --0016363b9360c84e310487b2df52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, I am from India and involved with Hadoop for last 1-2 month. I am planning to start Hadoop tutorial in India and would need help here. Please let me know some really good tutorials on Hadoop and also if you all can suggest what all can be included in the course content , such that this becomes a job oriented course. Looking forward to your reply. Thanks, Deepak On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > This month, the MapReduce + HDFS contributor meeting was held at > Cloudera Headquarters. > > Announcements for contributor meetings are here: > http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Contributors/ > > Minutes follow. No decisions were made at this meeting, but the > following issues were discussed and may presage future discussion and > decisions on these lists. > > Eli, I think you have all the slides. Would you mind sending them out? -C > > == 0.21 release update == > * Continuing to close blockers, ping people for updates and suggestions > * About 20 open blockers. Many are MapReduce documentation that may be > pushed. Speak up if 0.21 is missing anything substantive. > * Common/HDFS visibility and annotations are close to consensus; > MapReduce annotations are committed to trunk and the 0.21 branch > > == HEP proposal == > (what follows is the sketch presented at the meeting. A full proposal > with concrete details will be circulated on the list) > > * Based on- and very similar to- the PEP (Python Enhancement Proposal) > Process > * Audience is HDFS and MapReduce; not necessarily adopted by other > subprojects > - Addresses the perception that there is friction between > innovation/experimentation and stability > * Not for small enhancements, features, and bug fixes. This should not > slow down typical development or impede casual contribution to Hadoop > * Primary mechanism for new features, collecting input, documenting > design decisions > * JIRA is good for details, but not for deciding on wide shifts in > direction > * Purpose is for author to build consensus and gather dissenting opinions. > - All may comment, but Editors will review incoming HEP material > - Editors determine only whether the HEP is complete, not whether > they believe it is a sound idea > - Editors are appointed by the PMC > - Mechanism for appointing Editors and term of service TBD > - Apache Board appoints Shepherds for projects somewhat randomly, > to projects. A similar mechanism could work for incoming HEPs > - Proposal *may* come with code, but not necessarily. > Drafting/baking of the HEP occurs in public on a list dedicated to > that particular proposal. Once Editors certify the HEP as complete, it > is sent to general@ for wider discussion. > - The discussion phase begins on general@. The mailing list exists > to ensure the HEP is complete enough to present to the community. > - Some discussion on the difference between posting to general@ and > posting to the HEP list. Completeness is, of course, subjective. If > the Editor and Author disagree whether the proposal affects an aspect > of the framework enough to merit special consideration, it is not > entirely clear how to resolve the disagreement. > - In general, the role of the Editor in the community-driven > process of Hadoop is not entirely clear. It may be possible to > optimize it out. > - Once discussion ends, the HEP is passed (or fails to pass) by a > vote of the PMC (mechanics undefined). In Python, the result is > committed to the repository. A similar practice would make sense in > Hadoop. > * Which issues require HEPs? > - Discussion ranged. Append, backup namenode, edit log rewrite, et > al. were examples of features substantial enough to merit a HEP. Pure > Java CRC is an example of an enhancement that would not. Whether an > explicit process must be in place to determine whether an issue > requires a HEP is not clear. > - Viewing HEPs as a way of soliciting consensus for an approach > might be more accurate. Going through the HEP process should always > improve the chances of a successful proposal > > * Evaluation > - The proposal may be rejected if it is redundant with existing > functionality, technically unsound, insufficiently motivated, no > backwards compatibility story, etc. > - Implementation is not necessary, and is lightly discouraged. > Feedback is less welcome once code is in hand. > - Purpose is to be clear about the acceptance criteria for that > issue, e.g. concerns that the proposal may not scale or may harm > performance > - Dissenting opinions must be recorded accurately. Quoting would be > a safe practice for the Author to encourage HEP reviewers not to block > the product of the proposal. > > * The testing burden and completion strategy may be ambiguous > - Whether the proposal affects scalability may not be testable by > the implementer. Completing the proposal to address all use cases may > require considerably more work than the Author is willing or motivated > to invest. > - The HEP discussion on general@ should explore whether such > objections are merited and reasonable. For example, a particularly > obscure/esoteric use case could be included as a condition for > acceptance if the dissenter is willing to invest the resources to > test/validate it. The process is flexible in this regard. > - But it is not infinitely flexible. Backwards compatibility, > performance regression, availability, and other considerations need > not be called out in every HEP. > - Traditional concerns need to be documented. Acceptance criteria > should ideally be automated and reproducible in different > organizations > > == Branching == > * A patch and a branch are isomorphic from a policy perspective. Of > course, they are functionally distinct: branches are easier to > collaborate on and are, generally, longer-lived than are patches. But > special policies need not be derived to account for these differences, > which concern the production of the code, not its review and > acceptance. > * Some developers find branches to be easier to review than very large > patches and easier to merge, given a toolchain that supports this. > - Subversion currently is difficult to adapt to this model > - Could be done on a HEP-by-HEP basis, as a condition for acceptance > * Eclipse Labs > - Branded version of Google Code (same functionality, w/ Eclipse brand) > - Not official Eclipse projects, but associated with Eclipse > - Apache/Hadoop may consider a similar strategy > - Distinct from Apache Labs, as one need not be a committer, follow > its rules for releases, etc. > > == Contrib == > * Modules (such as fuse-dfs) are not actively maintained in the main > repository and would benefit from a release schedule decoupled from > the rest of Hadoop > * With few exceptions, the contrib modules have smaller, often > discrete groups of maintainers. It may be worth exploring whether > these projects could live elsewhere > -- Deepak Sharma http://www.linkedin.com/in/rikindia --0016363b9360c84e310487b2df52-- From general-return-1595-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 31 14:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93891 invoked from network); 31 May 2010 14:40:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 May 2010 14:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 12652 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2010 14:40:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12532 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2010 14:40:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92778 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2010 12:44:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of g.maxia@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nit0gBQ+/N5d//kJ6qKgeJQW54dsMMo1Up+9zEPTTA4=; b=gx0tM3EjkouBWoAS4TCzxSIwPThjmMIxFanALV54/N3D21tQSs5D1jK7YKqk4wqxwN NDeUGuxDBDPSjlPURiC/RXeQ5uOoG/KdsquvmcVRDCMZh9OMnZYAJo7qla+eEtH+fV7Z UA7XAe9R4BGyr9qqVtUhbQtE4dirs9UlEPsoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MTEP/oY3vmq+khjKIVMZL+bEmkf/vpVCGZEEg8BJf4GZG19B3PwSR2E214XMrj9ExB z2OSWsuGPmn/LbWyeuRpmqq0cnEeORDsi0VCSJMyj1ob/1ysiGTiAINTS4RfGq75dH1C e3RTWS9bbHJo97BI35bKxnSR4dx8SQTEr431Y= Message-ID: <4C03AF18.40409@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:44:08 +0200 From: Giuseppe Maxia Reply-To: opensqlcamp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: databases-discuss@opensolaris.org, derby-user@db.apache.org, firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, hsqldb-user@lists.sourceforge.net, mongodb-user@googlegroups.com, pbxt-discuss@lists.launchpad.net, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, sqlite-users@sqlite.org, blackray-dev@lists.softmethod.de, maatkit-discuss@googlegroups.com, mmm-devel@googlegroups.com, rethinkdb@googlegroups.com Subject: OpenSQLCamp EU 2010 - Call for participation is now open Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OpenSQL Camp is a free conference of, by, and for the open-source database community of users and developers. The OpenSQLCamp 2010, European Edition (http://opensqlcamp.org/) will take part in parallel to the Free and Open Source Conference 2010 (http://froscon.org/) on Saturday 21st and Sunday 22nd August in St. Augustin, Germany, which is located close to Bonn and Cologne. The goal of this event is to spread the word about the vibrant communities and large ecosystems that exist around Open Source Databases and to educate the attendees about possible alternatives to commercial databases. It is a place where people come to learn, to participate and to contribute. We would like to invite your project to participate in this event. We've set up a call for participation (http://opensqlcamp.org/Events/2010/Call_for_Participation) - the deadline for submitting your proposal is July 11th. We are seeking talks related to Open Source Databases of all kind, not just relational databases! Submission about tools and technologies related to OSS databases (e.g. connectors/APIs) are also welcome. Some ideas and for submissions: * A how to presentation, showing how to solve a common problem in the database field. * An introduction/overview about a certain database project/product or related tool * Providing "best practices" information for administrators * A deeply technical and developer-centric session about some project's internals or an API used to connect to a database We look forward to your contribution! Please don't hesitate to contact us via IRC (#opensqlcamp on FreeNode) or our Discussion Group (http://groups.google.com/group/opensqlcamp) From general-return-1596-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 31 17:17:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34172 invoked from network); 31 May 2010 17:17:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 May 2010 17:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 92923 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2010 17:17:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92861 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2010 17:17:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92853 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2010 17:17:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:17:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:17:11 +0000 Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so3568130gwj.35 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:16:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.187.82 with SMTP id cv18mr735806qcb.83.1275326210709; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.94.203 with HTTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <66BC29ED-35C1-4916-BDFE-C768810C6EA6@mac.com> <4BFBFAC3.2040807@apache.org> <4BFCF6CF.2000605@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal for making core Hadoop changes From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65bba76c319180487e705a4 --0016e65bba76c319180487e705a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A far more lightweight example of multi-issue feature planning in an open source project comes from Drizzle and their "blueprints": https://blueprints.launchpad.net/drizzle. Each "spec" has a drafter, an approver, and an assignee; declares the other specs on which it depends; points to the relevant branches in the source tree and issues in the issue tracker; and has a priority, definition state, and implementation state. I don't know how it's working out for them in practice, but on paper it looks quite nice. On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > > No, but I'd estimate the cost of merging at 1-2 days work a week just to > > pull in the code *and identify why the tests are failing*. Git may be > better > > at merging in changes, but if Hadoop doesn't work on my machine after the > > merge, I need to identify whether its my code, the merged code, some > machine > > quirk, etc. It's the testing that is the problem for me, not the > > merge effort. That's the Hadoop own tests any my own functional test > suites, > > the ones that bring up clusters and push work through. Those are the > > troublespots, as they do things that hadoop's own tests don't do, like as > > for all the JSP pages. > > I've lived off a git branch of common/hdfs for half a year with a big > uncommitted patch, it's no where near 1-2 days of effort per week to > merge in changes from trunk. If the tests are passing on trunk, and > they fail after your merge then those are real test failures due to > your change (and therefore should require effort). The issues with > your internal tests failing due to changes on trunk is the same > whether you merge or you just do an update - you have to update before > checking in the patch anyway - so that issue is about the state of > trunk when you merge or update, rather than about being on a branch. > > > > >> Might find the > >> following interesting: > >> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html > > > > There's a long story behind JDD's paper, I'm glad you have read it, it > does > > lay out what is effectively the ASF process for effecting significant > change > > -but it doesn't imply that's the only process for having changes. > > > > Just to be clear I don't mean imply that branches are the only process > for making changes. Interesting that this is considered the effective > ASF process, it hasn't seemed to me that recent big features on hadoop > have used it, only one I'm aware of that was done on a branch was > append. > > > I think gradual evolution in trunk is good, it lets people play with > what's > > coming in. Having lots of separate branches and everyone's private > release > > being a merge of many patches that you choose is bad. > > Agreed. Personally I don't think people should release from branches. > And in practice I don't think you'll see lots of branches, people can > and would still develop on trunk. Getting changes merged from a branch > back to trunk before the whole branch is merged is a good thing, the > whole branch may never be merged and that's OK too. Branches are a > mechanism, releases are policy. > > Thanks, > Eli > --0016e65bba76c319180487e705a4-- From general-return-1120-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:03:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83311 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 87041 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 04:13:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87001 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 04:13:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86993 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 04:13:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:13:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.222.181 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of peter@motally.com) Received: from [209.85.222.181] (HELO mail-pz0-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:13:08 +0000 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so1644579pzk.9 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:12:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.215.40 with SMTP id n40mr2201534wag.209.1267416768157; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:12:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:12:48 -0800 Message-ID: <2c44f6691002282012n740a4d93x8b4be25028bfd0d2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: testing if replication working From: Peter Sankauskas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ce60c3f97ac0480b576e9 --0016e64ce60c3f97ac0480b576e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Using the web interface, you can browse the data on individual data nodes, so that is one (manual) way of doing it without powering off any machines. Kind regards, Peter Sankauskas On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > I just setup my first hadoop cluster with 5 nodes. What is the best > way to check if replication is really working? I assume the best way > is to power down 2 nodes and see if I can still reach my data? > > Or are there any others ways? > > TIA > --0016e64ce60c3f97ac0480b576e9-- From general-return-1115-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:13:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19113 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:13:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:13:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 55015 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54975 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54964 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 22:07:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:07:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:07:38 +0000 Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so836540gwa.35 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dpN6DioIcjDsq6P4EhmbaWhA/WrA/x9m16JAl0ugtck=; b=IpocQ/5K2Us7k97T/ST2UXDNcrWcnQEgq02xMLdHxsWgJQeaSlva0chGVBH36wYbxi R9FODnoAv2GmO1xLmd9RjshNpi0fLTh9lPsCL+g/TV2Kk23UrzRSIsi92BR0yvzkMB/J Ne8vBodtjpHQvErUKmHVbW+BKGawgJG0i3sOQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mwNChpOAZfgoDFcFnNuQ+CPJshv+FrNycSqwCED28loDunaICPLmXCDatyoO7ATmqS FFGxuhj47bKUTDXZVjzG46e3mBArgBCWlPJ5aY2vlKO8T1ftSIjuEXhmCvt+qDIuW8IO sLDNbUaG+BtobTfaTBtH+q0vhrEjB6oGA20+A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.55.25 with SMTP id d25mr4791000yba.330.1267394837376; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:07:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:07:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781002281407l6eaf4acau43e17d958930e73d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd705be126fe20480b05b3e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd705be126fe20480b05b3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That's on my list; is it perhaps as simple as adjusting the config file (ex: /etc/hadoop/conf/core-site.xml) by adding another value to the dfs.data.dir property? (Ref ) If so, afterward, it may or may not be necessary to rebalance; it can apparently often just take care of itself, in the normal course of operation. On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Oded Rosen wrote: > We have an existing HDFS cluster with several datanodes, and we want to add > each of the datanodes another hard-disk... --000e0cd705be126fe20480b05b3e-- From general-return-1116-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:15:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21894 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 59470 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:15:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59428 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:15:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59420 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 22:15:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:15:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:14:58 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1577342pzk.5 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:14:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.75.21 with SMTP id x21mr2040043wfa.212.1267395277583; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:14:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:14:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Oded, You don't need to format to to add disks to DNs. Just format them and add the directories to dfs.data.dir in the config file, and restart the DN. The data in an individual DN won't be automatically balanced across disks when you restart. Rebalancing is not necessary as the DN will round robin blocks over all disks and stop writing to a disk when it fills. If you want the disks to be balanced you can do that manually by copying the block files from the existing data directories to the new ones--HDFS just checks for the blocks at startup, it doesn't keep track of which directory they were stored in. Thanks, Eli On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Oded Rosen wrote: > We have an existing HDFS cluster with several datanodes, and we want to add > each of the datanodes another hard-disk, as an addition to the existing > ones. > Is there a way of doing this without formatting the cluster? Our aim is to > save all the data where it is, add and configure the new disks, perform a > balance - with no format whatsoever. > Is it possible? if so, how? > > Any kind of help will be welcomed. > Thanks, > > -- > Oded > From general-return-1117-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:24:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39402 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:24:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 64841 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:18:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64811 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:18:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64803 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 22:18:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:18:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:18:25 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so1088934ywh.2 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:18:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TDFp9pdK/Nayv/Ph7RsRiTi71g25iEKnYsv1e3YOH08=; b=YkpvWnAPKp9YN7dPA080SBClWl8qtOD9KNYHI5XyXHGFBkc3YI9UvSutEAVrGivGoO Q7hXp2hlXl6oV14K6D356fN/+GXVNVZCNSn04XYRNESpDyvOhvkQWHlI8BRMWP79f8ox OuBCihvKAikWf16xeu0j9YVS8q+fPgzVYSmUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KoL6uIJvVVK0B4zArs9h2uu2YpHNi8Jdb822r2MqVEBXtaE6QMA+LvSfrTtN7uCh64 23dmwqo62+7MDeH3ijOBrpLyBM5540Itc1tnyBEjaSEO2cp5iw+Z7DxaSIaKW5m66aiK tPSJZeImq4W5MautyopfhPdWB3myZY+kXaYao= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.55.25 with SMTP id d25mr4804466yba.330.1267395484957; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:18:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:18:04 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd705beabbb9c0480b081e0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd705beabbb9c0480b081e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > You don't need to format to to add disks to DNs. Just format them and > add the directories to dfs.data.dir in the config file, and restart > the DN Nice; I was hoping it was that simple! :) I presume it makes no sense to try to spread the NameNode across multiple disks? Thanks, Marc --000e0cd705beabbb9c0480b081e0-- From general-return-1118-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:33:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56913 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:33:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:33:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 72544 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:27:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72512 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 22:27:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72504 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 22:27:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:27:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.195] (HELO mail-pz0-f195.google.com) (209.85.222.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:27:45 +0000 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so1582429pzk.5 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:27:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.249.19 with SMTP id w19mr2038840wfh.194.1267396044692; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:27:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:27:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I presume it makes no sense to try to spread the NameNode across multiple > disks? Not quite sure what you mean here, but dfs.name.dir (where the NN stores its metadata) should have multiple directories on different disks to guard against the failure of any single disk. Many people also use RAIDed disks and include an NFS mount in dfs.name.dir to have additional, reliable copies of this data. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1121-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 07:49:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83217 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 07:49:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 07:49:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 63637 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 07:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63599 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 07:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63591 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 07:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [132.239.27.72] (HELO tayla.daedalus.ca) (132.239.27.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:49:22 +0000 Received: from terrence-martins-macbook-pro.local (unknown [192.168.1.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tmartin) by tayla.daedalus.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417A6D40016 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:49:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B8B7169.8010805@physics.ucsd.edu> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:48:57 -0800 From: Terrence Martin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: testing if replication working References: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mag Gam wrote: > I just setup my first hadoop cluster with 5 nodes. What is the best > way to check if replication is really working? I assume the best way > is to power down 2 nodes and see if I can still reach my data? > > Or are there any others ways? > > TIA > Well if you run hadoop fsck / it will give you a report of the number of replicas, if a file has less than your configured replicas it will tell you that you are under replicated. As for powering off 2 nodes, well that will likely result in a few missing blocks unless you have more than 2 replicas of each block. Now if you turn off one data node after a while Hadoop will replicate the blocks to the remaining 4 nodes, when you turn the 5th back on you will have over replicated blocks. Terrence From general-return-1119-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 08:04:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23748 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 08:04:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 08:04:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3213 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 00:58:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3148 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 00:58:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3138 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 00:58:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:58:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.172] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.223.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:57:55 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2091515iwn.29 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=XgeAwZxk6joF0JIYq3trbKJn2W/LCbC7mspnktojUK8=; b=URHd44xQsjQ5GZhRbazOkKzSVMgRNovVdBKUMUYEjNqzDxjuS+34nBblC1YyQRSfTE 4fCfu5IVcqG7q33ZhOo0R48PYGzOGM7Oxm7lzwuHquF6VZyu5BOx0eLzeFP6a8ewcP+l NquCtS6SDCHbJ4Szo9Dr7L7wM81sv+z1Zrs/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YpnUr8thhtCHOcbz5m1DUtCUXR7McPTlt6SeDs+yQsK5Y60O8cY3tiXl/aKbzv/ScA OX4jKXK1mo8Fpdgiy6IDSQ7cSa5zQ1egst/eNd0b3vkc2gmTtXEM3sLBQYpHkR4sTwv/ 1eKhGNV2jnVvoejtYsHb5SpYNBqYXZGhhWInA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.154.197 with SMTP id p5mr288458ibw.28.1267405054674; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:57:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:57:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> Subject: testing if replication working From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I just setup my first hadoop cluster with 5 nodes. What is the best way to check if replication is really working? I assume the best way is to power down 2 nodes and see if I can still reach my data? Or are there any others ways? TIA From general-return-1114-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 08:59:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28353 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 08:59:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 08:59:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 29473 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 21:45:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29418 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 21:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29410 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 21:45:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:45:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.223.172 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [209.85.223.172] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.223.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:45:44 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1997695iwn.29 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:45:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.153.205 with SMTP id l13mr142180ibw.64.1267393523341; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:45:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:45:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045013bffbfe0e80480b00c06 --005045013bffbfe0e80480b00c06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We have an existing HDFS cluster with several datanodes, and we want to add each of the datanodes another hard-disk, as an addition to the existing ones. Is there a way of doing this without formatting the cluster? Our aim is to save all the data where it is, add and configure the new disks, perform a balance - with no format whatsoever. Is it possible? if so, how? Any kind of help will be welcomed. Thanks, -- Oded --005045013bffbfe0e80480b00c06-- From general-return-1122-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 10:46:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33323 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 10:46:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 10:46:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 88438 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88411 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88403 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=10.0 tests=ASF_LIST_OPS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.99.145.3] (HELO mx.inode.at) (62.99.145.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:46:28 +0000 Received: from [213.47.112.79] (port=13228 helo=localhost) by smartmx-03.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nm38Z-0000Eb-Ml for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:46:07 +0100 Resent-From: rho@devc.at Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:46:06 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <20100301104606.GA9844@odman.int.devc.at> Resent-To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on admon.int.devc.at X-Spam-Level: Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=admon.int.devc.at) by admon.int.devc.at with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nm2t4-0001ab-DB for rho@localhost; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:30:06 +0100 Received: from mx.inode.at [213.229.60.100] by admon.int.devc.at with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.9-rc2) for (single-drop); Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:30:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [213.47.112.79] (port=10695 helo=localhost) by smartmx-14.inode.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nm2sl-0007eF-W4; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:29:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:29:28 +0100 From: Robert Barta To: general-help@hadoop.apache.org Subject: MapReduce/Hadoop semantic maps Message-ID: <20100301102927.GI23015@odman.int.devc.at> Reply-To: rho@devc.at MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: Robert Barta User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Hi folks, Maybe a bit off topic, but then not: I have been playing for a while with a semantic network covering the Hadoop ecosphere, MapReduce in general, a bit of CC technologies. My real objective though is on visualizing that into a "topic map": http://kill.devc.at/node/313 I use the technology for semantic text mining, and then for teaching, uhm, I mean of course knowledge transfer ;-) Clearly, this is work in progress. If you care to take a look, I would be interested to hear how _your_ intuitive picture of the landscape differs. I am also happy to add more specific material. I am a lousy librarian... \rho From general-return-1123-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 10:49:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34580 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 10:49:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 10:49:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 95089 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 10:49:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95053 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 10:49:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95045 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 10:49:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:49:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:49:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F1D1BA46C for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:48:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UOWPqytNUC4B for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884BF1BA464 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:48:44 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1268045314.08303@GiGpo+Ol7SbCeLQDBqez0Q Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o21AmW93009824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:48:33 GMT Message-ID: <4B8B9B80.3070509@apache.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:48:32 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o21AmW93009824 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eli Collins wrote: >> I presume it makes no sense to try to spread the NameNode across multiple >> disks? > > Not quite sure what you mean here, but dfs.name.dir (where the NN > stores its metadata) should have multiple directories on different > disks to guard against the failure of any single disk. Many people > also use RAIDed disks and include an NFS mount in dfs.name.dir to have > additional, reliable copies of this data. Best of all: a secondary namenode to get the streamed event log, as that will mean your cluster restarts faster. You do not want to lose your NN data. We've discussed making it easier to hot-swap a disk drive on a live datanode, that could be simplified by having the DN take all data off that disks onto its other disks (if there is room), and then copying it back in later. Nobody has done any work on this yet: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-664 From general-return-1124-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 12:38:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81957 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 12:38:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 12:38:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 35421 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 12:38:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35374 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 12:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35360 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 12:38:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:38:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.172] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (209.85.223.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:38:49 +0000 Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so2477801iwn.29 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:38:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XHMS6GW9RC4k2+Lv9ZzZGvdAvcZ2JSEE9kvdpbweVa4=; b=YrvNehfy8tnreNyOGfZxYxig8S0xRfU5tgCNrKbIumzojwIxTiAPeQoDY0ZZdLTh38 hEaFUWLYVJ35ADEFjsQqCQmHp9M2vRVHq3pZPtTb9RBaee3q28Xp/4iK7oZB98BrtUFj u6tAl3bJrzgd8vSjQJ2pFR6PCItEecq/7a0mM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mguNZGda5alophWFJsh5YGSKZXcpgRTzBxCEtCZ9ZKLNzMbYT3IIT2dY+0efqQRliO VOU88AzMaLMw0BiFQuptg6oCrKWU10s9/wB+mpfbHVRDAxWSg1rSL/F+p7AQV05bxmvo mW5Mauafi2pFgTd0o7W37Y37vsO9UbFweEt7o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.150.74 with SMTP id x10mr331574ibv.97.1267447107117; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:38:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8B7169.8010805@physics.ucsd.edu> References: <1cbd6f831002281657y7a0eeedbq57b78601c2e11f91@mail.gmail.com> <4B8B7169.8010805@physics.ucsd.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 07:38:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003010438v5f52a570p527764ce65288ad3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: testing if replication working From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for your responses. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Terrence Martin wrote: > Mag Gam wrote: >> >> I just setup my first hadoop cluster with 5 nodes. What is the best >> way to check if replication is really working? I assume the best way >> is to power down 2 nodes and see if I can still reach my data? >> >> Or are there any others ways? >> >> TIA >> > > Well if you run > > hadoop fsck / > > it will give you a report of the number of replicas, if a file has less than > your configured replicas it will tell you that you are under replicated. > > As for powering off 2 nodes, well that will likely result in a few missing > blocks unless you have more than 2 replicas of each block. Now if you turn > off one data node after a while Hadoop will replicate the blocks to the > remaining 4 nodes, when you turn the 5th back on you will have over > replicated blocks. > > Terrence > > From general-return-1125-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 16:19:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81255 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 16:19:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 16:19:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 13619 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 16:19:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13579 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 16:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13571 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 16:19:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:19:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:19:38 +0000 Received: by gyb13 with SMTP id 13so1154742gyb.35 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:19:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Yg/yaYt91iCgaPYoM8FvrGEllUPdWlUaOk+U1C60Acw=; b=AdBQsYwsD/k1LAvdhpDrYfK2QI51YNll6NbtZVqRUATAU4rEPI25QaZ5a5k7ZV0vzU xngLEdPiWDTFUDLbZnolB9eZyoFODGk8ij5Mb+pogTCwMG9ko+bZrNvbCMNrYTkfbi5T ZmAGbV3hDU4iSXq6UrQw4fiUCh43dut/lDMrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Ppe7HpQr52WgnoVO1L3x6Lg6HnbsQKZtm8lHuUWUZ17/Do0WVmZwmBt3w+8UgF8eYh 4/PSs9Twu/BSo6MCI2ovIsrLehJrtRWimFDLtyJWSeycd+RIcBdSRundKmj6M2DbxhcG 7noxslN6H+K3iTIKt775Vq1QYTG7JXpGq2GfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.65.18 with SMTP id n18mr1302479yba.136.1267460357681; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:19:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:19:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781003010819v61f9a792t2ac7c8bba2ec4964@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c6fa62f47c0480bf9cfe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5c6fa62f47c0480bf9cfe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > dfs.name.dir (where the NN > stores its metadata) should have multiple directories on different > disks to guard against the failure of any single disk. Many people > also use RAIDed disks and include an NFS mount in dfs.name.dir to have > additional, reliable copies of this data. Cool; so just to make sure I understand: The OS presents a single directory to the NameNode; that single directory can have other measures under it, like RAID. Right? Thanks, Marc --000e0cd5c6fa62f47c0480bf9cfe-- From general-return-1126-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 16:22:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82873 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 16:22:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 16:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18751 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 16:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18703 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 16:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18695 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 16:22:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:22:05 +0000 Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so1156979gwa.35 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:21:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R4PcAxAj4pS7v5fTmn8v88v99/Bq8gUOLpGdJCj+4hM=; b=T7w/YdjT5Acs7rBkqXT2jqQTFQklOqd/8/N1kzS0lYROyaPnUM6G53rXdc+3aUJihw gvdyWu6A4Egh/pgsc9L7il9qXlhT1pXySv/nmhm8oJUFPwfAp22ygwHH7Hc7c/hu/xmp rNehec0AbREriOniTlquGirJ1BDYElMX3ws0Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wGYmymC8bcu/d5tiS/NmDlbtXFZdUgdmG+ZHxLQhhnwrWAr817Of+PYYlJxyS5y7xN LIaUQxTyb1YCkmBNF/e18Eut51oRtlNgiPp5kdp03V2wSu/ZDMBbRVWxOFjrU46NA5XC C/URAmtDW/7qdjeKq9IIkMSeqkSskiqV78d+k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.74.17 with SMTP id w17mr6515413yba.313.1267460504165; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:21:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8B9B80.3070509@apache.org> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4B8B9B80.3070509@apache.org> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:21:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781003010821w68336d83x3ebcfd1b2939b940@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd48df61e1f4c0480bfa5db --000e0cd48df61e1f4c0480bfa5db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Best of all: a secondary namenode to get the streamed event log, as that > will mean your cluster restarts faster. You do not want to lose your NN > data. > If the NN data is lost, all the HDFS data is functionally lost, right? - Marc --000e0cd48df61e1f4c0480bfa5db-- From general-return-1127-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 18:02:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43831 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 18:02:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 18:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 50237 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 18:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50056 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 18:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50048 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 18:02:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:02:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:02:45 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=SvmGqgFBOAxDeyyTxNulRMfCNon/f/sLXt7OT+PbQwIKtwdAxevnu6FM XPmNJbu78EBkbyXHSJcixGPpKZpqBWOesZKUNj2I0BWgRvlmmAM04m4wC +gkoq+qC8JwLC9u; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267466565; x=1299002565; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20testing=20if=20replication=20working |Date:=20Mon,=2001=20Mar=202010=2010:02:24=20-0800 |Message-ID:=20 |To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0 |Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<4B8B71 69.8010805@physics.ucsd.edu>; bh=QFfXwj7dulTESHkQKy4HppHhOKmURo+YkEmsIA3yP8I=; b=sRnnh2UhDPhHGFIO55L3QuM1/pD0T+rQEEqiixhqgOEZsc9AyI1pKDJO hmm7sXPgLM7gq8ZRLD7OQpShkpY3VN+wtK1DJhX5keXiJEXu7DliFbMqk 87tsXphXFelxGri; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,561,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11464825" Received: from 172.18.36.164 ([172.18.36.164]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:02:25 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:02:24 -0800 Subject: Re: testing if replication working From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: testing if replication working Thread-Index: Acq5aVhxQVXP1nv2hku78Ll7JyoyKw== In-Reply-To: <4B8B7169.8010805@physics.ucsd.edu> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/28/10 11:48 PM, "Terrence Martin" wrote: > Mag Gam wrote: >> I just setup my first hadoop cluster with 5 nodes. What is the best >> way to check if replication is really working? I assume the best way >> is to power down 2 nodes and see if I can still reach my data? > Well if you run > > hadoop fsck / > > it will give you a report of the number of replicas, if a file has less > than your configured replicas it will tell you that you are under > replicated. You can also tell fsck to show you which blocks are on which datanodes ... hadoop fsck / -files -blocks -locations ... to do a manual inspection. From general-return-1128-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 19:00:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67186 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 19:00:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 19:00:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 54440 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:00:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54402 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54335 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 19:00:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:00:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.177] (HELO mail-px0-f177.google.com) (209.85.216.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:00:40 +0000 Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so961277pxi.30 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:00:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.62.15 with SMTP id k15mr2782427wfa.139.1267470019137; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:00:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4c7b1781003010819v61f9a792t2ac7c8bba2ec4964@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781003010819v61f9a792t2ac7c8bba2ec4964@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:00:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Marc Farnum Rendino wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> dfs.name.dir (where the NN >> stores its metadata) should have multiple directories on different >> disks to guard against the failure of any single disk. Many people >> also use RAIDed disks and include an NFS mount in dfs.name.dir to have >> additional, reliable copies of this data. > > > Cool; so just to make sure I understand: > > The OS presents a single directory to the NameNode; that single directory > can have other measures under it, like RAID. > > Right? Yes, it's good to have multiple directories as well as may each or at least some of the directories reliable, eg below /data//dfs/namenode are local disks and /mnt/filer-hdfs is a reliable NFS filer. dfs.name.dir /data/1/dfs/namenode,/data/2/dfs/namenode,/mnt/filer-hdfs/dfs/namenode You also of course want to run a secondary namenode (2NN), though that's more to keep the edits log size (and restart time) manageable rather than for reliability purposes. Having a 2NN on a separate host does act as a backup of your NN metadata, though it will always be out of date. There's work on trunk to add a backup name node which gets a stream of edits from the NN so it has an update copy of the metadata. Thanks, Eli > > Thanks, > > Marc > From general-return-1129-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 19:03:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67637 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 19:03:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 19:03:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 56218 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:03:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56170 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56162 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 19:03:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.181] (HELO mail-pz0-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:03:16 +0000 Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so2213186pzk.9 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:02:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.66.10 with SMTP id o10mr2767129wfa.321.1267470176102; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:02:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4c7b1781003010821w68336d83x3ebcfd1b2939b940@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4B8B9B80.3070509@apache.org> <4c7b1781003010821w68336d83x3ebcfd1b2939b940@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:02:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Marc Farnum Rendino wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > >> Best of all: a secondary namenode to get the streamed event log, as that >> will mean your cluster restarts faster. You do not want to lose your NN >> data. >> > > If the NN data is lost, all the HDFS data is functionally lost, right? > Yes, it is important that the NN metadata (the fsimage and edits log) are stored reliably. There's a great chapter on HDFS administration in the book Hadoop: The Definitive Guide. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1130-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 19:58:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87695 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 19:58:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 19:58:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 50241 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:58:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50184 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 19:58:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50148 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 19:58:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:58:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zshao9@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:58:04 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so2727837iwn.21 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=idsR/Ju4HRWQWrF9EROekZy0oKSVfwC2doDy+RmH9uA=; b=iM4MVzupxCaQQWuaXm3wgthLPWz3KKH+YxPTY8RPZLzYFBZZ4zzjxGp4d9zeB+nKcd BEeCT85UwJxBScve/sn5jpbzWmGDL7ZV0kZUHe193P34/btOlARe4queqtBGWW8NLPaq FwbRKCWo1l/BkHKLaLl5vJSze/Bw4hoRG+2No= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=unaHqPpopjHsO3r4rpp7lnFR16OyArIW0ctVaS67uEbDj2llM553g+uWWevvvrODrG /EaIIJs64TEIX6lwWKp/OLSSY2Cb6DJnrzF5tCKIikKgVT3xQma9j8vLDxqqmRDesLFr ulY/QPIVGI2dg8hmNEYNUvsTsudKxiqgZs4Ho= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.156.80 with SMTP id v16mr101743ibw.79.1267473463512; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:57:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <34fd060d1002261356u1f37e824x8f879d20ba1ebdb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <34fd060d1002261356u1f37e824x8f879d20ba1ebdb6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:57:43 -0800 Message-ID: <34fd060d1003011157k7453df1nba040378bb121a75@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hive User Group Meeting 3/18/2010 7pm at Facebook From: Zheng Shao To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We also created a Meetup group in case you prefer to register on meetup.com http://www.meetup.com/Hive-User-Group-Meeting/calendar/12741356/ We are hosting a Hive User Group Meeting, open to all current and potential hadoop/hive users. Agenda: * Hive Tutorial (Carl Steinbach, cloudera): 20 min * Hive User Case Study (Eva Tse, netflix): 20 min * New Features and API (Hive team, Facebook): 25 min JDBC/ODBC and CTAS(Create Table As Select) UDF/UDAF/UDTF (User-defined Functions) Create View/HBaseInputFormat (Hive and HBase integration) Hive Join Strategy (How Hive does the join) SerDe (Hive's serialization/deserialization framework) Hive is a scalable data warehouse infrastructure built on top of Hadoop. It provides tools to enable easy data ETL, a mechanism to put structures on the data, and the capability to querying and analysis of large data sets stored in Hadoop files. Hive defines a simple SQL-like query language, called HiveQL, that enables users familiar with SQL to query the data. At the same time, this language also allows programmers who are familiar with MapReduce to be able to plug in their custom mappers and reducers to perform more sophisticated analysis. The current largest deployment of Hive is the silver cluster at Facebook, which consists of 1100 nodes with 8 CPU-cores and 12 1TB-disk each. The total capacity is 8800 CPU-cores with 13 PB of raw storage space. More than 4 TB of compressed data (20+ TB uncompressed) are loaded into Hive every day. If you'd like to network with fellow Hive/Hadoop users online, feel free to find them here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=3D319237846974 Zheng On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Zheng Shao wrote: > Hi all, > > We are going to hold the second Hive User Group Meeting at 7PM on > 3/18/2010 Thursday. > > The agenda will be: > > * Hive Tutorial: 20 min > * Hive User Case Study: 20 min > * New Features and API: 25 min > =A0JDBC/ODBC and CTAS > =A0UDF/UDAF/UDTF > =A0Create View/HBaseInputFormat > =A0Hive Join Strategy > =A0SerDe > > The audience is beginner to intermediate Hive users/developers. > > *** The details are here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=3D3192378= 46974 *** > *** Please RSVP so we can schedule logistics accordingly. *** > > -- > Yours, > Zheng > --=20 Yours, Zheng From general-return-1131-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 21:14:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21173 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 21:14:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 21:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 72719 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 21:14:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72653 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 21:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72645 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 21:14:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:14:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:14:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 21038 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 21:14:18 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.108]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:14:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4B8C2E28.6090402@apache.org> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:14:16 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org CC: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Avro: 1.3.0 available Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Avro 1.3.0 is now available. In this release: - the Avro file format has been revised and simplified; - the source tree and release artifacts have been restructured; - the Java port has been significantly optimized; - the Python port has been largely rewritten; - the C port is now considerably more complete, supporting data files; - a Ruby port has been added, supporting data files and RPC. Release artifacts may be downloaded from a mirror at: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hadoop/avro/avro-1.3.0/ The Java release is available through Maven. The full change list is at: http://tinyurl.com/avro130relnotes Doug From general-return-1132-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 01 21:32:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30063 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 21:32:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 21:32:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5425 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 21:32:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5392 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5384 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:32:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:32:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 29796 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2010 21:31:45 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f213.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:31:45 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so2061390bwz.12 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.153 with SMTP id g25mr3504069bkw.158.1267479101017; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:31:40 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org, private@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of changes may be found in the release notes: http://bit.ly/dd6rwL And in JIRA: COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C From general-return-1133-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 00:09:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73829 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 00:09:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 00:09:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 26330 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26298 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26290 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 00:08:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:08:51 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so1757932ywh.2 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:08:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gE61MftzCaWHS1bhGkGtjcC8Lj7Ebe6/RK8MxVhnBwM=; b=knCI8h1NJJXazkZ3VRdd7MPvj6pL4r8sB83fYSXWSeip+YG3XcCEek1uHhuDpRDj31 W4Ydx3LCjDND015mIuWlpRvYngGTFdvn3fQGNq9wSNe0FE3tjdA1kwjOP+aSO5dNWZfn ycC7K/iteRPtmgxSSF5jilNDdoBn8R5D+xl8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SX45OnBJ4WHNrpkYMop5h4+MbyRln76pYMb6nNEoBtUSdLFNaoTd1qsIcwIQsHoKNI /R0U/2F2863bdZbJGLwyrOxD4CKCtkj8J0s83WJ11OZDx9qRhydznJSYrbihNa/TD1GJ /5xaTs8dca6eMrS4Q38abkMFKsdyGtpLoA1UU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.24.21 with SMTP id b21mr7471855ybj.201.1267488510773; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:08:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781003010819v61f9a792t2ac7c8bba2ec4964@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:08:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd297a8710aec0480c62a8b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd297a8710aec0480c62a8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Yes, it's good to have multiple directories as well as may each or at > least some of the directories reliable, eg below > /data//dfs/namenode are local disks and /mnt/filer-hdfs is a > reliable NFS filer. > > dfs.name.dir > > /data/1/dfs/namenode,/data/2/dfs/namenode,/mnt/filer-hdfs/dfs/namenode > Ah; nice - preciate the clarification. > You also of course want to run a secondary namenode (2NN), though > that's more to keep the edits log size (and restart time) manageable > rather than for reliability purposes. Having a 2NN on a separate host > does act as a backup of your NN metadata, though it will always be out > of date. But that's one of those "better than the alternative" situations. :) > There's work on trunk to add a backup name node which gets a > stream of edits from the NN so it has an update copy of the metadata. > Ah; I think this is alluded to in the conf file, right? - Marc --000e0cd297a8710aec0480c62a8b-- From general-return-1134-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 00:21:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76772 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 00:21:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 00:21:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 45798 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45759 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45751 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 00:21:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:21:17 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=SWtaP7Xo17OuSa8yXOaKDHAEgC8Y2D7BGqsZEhfXdI+jyA710L1VjsTI if4UZPZoHXS7aEbuvNGyQgvO31zyToY7Fs3ikR6x5sVCdDRe3/3rwYe3j yVHxN/5Vs7nPFf5; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267489277; x=1299025277; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Adding=20hard-disks=20to=20an=20existin g=20HDFS=20cluster|Date:=20Mon,=2001=20Mar=202010=2016:20 :24=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version: =201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20< 4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.co m>; bh=YanaOkIg8vm1iQfzEv1IkRc0eWT0BkiT3xJkw5YAwuY=; b=PGG4/2SMN5KJPCcllmS5IVCQHCM70DxYzyalXnCuOfMY2UzblU6bag+V ZeImHCi2ObWGda4ahgj4fLpEusIen4ASFrCBpglPZcx4pIZV1VUlxcCyb KA9egqkv88luWGE; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,563,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11473749" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 00:20:27 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:20:24 -0800 Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster Thread-Index: Acq5nibGx8/GAOWDI0qlJceFJVNL0A== In-Reply-To: <4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Marc, You might find my preso I did on Hadoop at Apachecon EU last year handy: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations?action=AttachFile&do=view& target=aw-apachecon-eu-2009.pdf aka http://bit.ly/d3UU4A It talks a bit about the care and feeding of your Hadoop grid, including how to configure multiple dirs for the NN. From general-return-1135-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 00:22:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77198 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 00:22:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 00:22:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 48995 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:22:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48938 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:22:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48930 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 00:22:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:22:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.199] (HELO mail-yw0-f199.google.com) (209.85.211.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:22:25 +0000 Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so1763712ywh.2 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:22:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=H7sqWC9B+B8OkEf94AW5/ezrmOwaxh+v307VzOmRJt8=; b=IHp5lpOXh2RNPwRoVc5sCyQKx+b/aG1IyEyU6Q+x0GmBXF+5tqna3GtvupZkLtb3LE 8/mMtn4D7LXOgX6Yi6IYKRIttA4ASp6tbRIeZEyKI+SR9TxahwvL5tApDXCG3Govg0ja DfbZzojr1oRhL4f6VclaMpmjq/q0MdcwqJXs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=u6da6MJGE/ynLgr4VQkvxycGdcxtZCpIA7z9nc7kClIFO7j+WN9Ke4Po3bWkcghmJD XtqxbUvRrWykcY+gg87tb7llW1s3yxaWptA91FlLPcEgaFWZcjidSvI2jcMZI5GuKchp 9t0ws++Q977M911iknKd17jTAh9PhV4vtik+8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.129.4 with SMTP id g4mr5632961ybn.1.1267488909441; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:15:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4B8B9B80.3070509@apache.org> <4c7b1781003010821w68336d83x3ebcfd1b2939b940@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:15:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781003011615s18f27f1ds252552ad8a3b37e6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f0fa8343b420480c64233 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001e680f0fa8343b420480c64233 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > Yes, it is important that the NN metadata (the fsimage and edits log) > are stored reliably. There's a great chapter on HDFS administration > in the book Hadoop: The Definitive Guide. Ah; I'd discounted it, because the hadoop ecosystem seems to be evolving so fast, it seemed better to focus on online and recently-updated info. Maybe it's not quite that divergent yet. :) Thanks, Marc --001e680f0fa8343b420480c64233-- From general-return-1136-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 00:23:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77707 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 00:23:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 00:23:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 52026 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:23:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51971 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:23:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51961 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 00:23:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:23:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mvgfr1@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:23:16 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so730866gxk.11 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:22:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gh6oAHAxqda5mjNsChsVRZ9GiH/jivhIIZ/1IdNQuDQ=; b=ufItpHyVX5oeUcejis5/bbXznEmYsAVhhtT4YVBvq22wZrPy8Q8Oy/+SviGQwz/LhE 2Ua168zg995BfP4Eys5mXth8POQBo569b8pJKpDhXEmxOlpw+99NN8isUlxOq7Ih/4SV aX+4qGj7dbkqo3/H/HRRjy/aiYCKYVLfDlEII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=V/9oNcn6YnBTthnKXcsCHxFak2EJcaUvGNFWga6aqW4DlZsF067kMm/wou7I+AFpqE OmyGHbkxFMfH8Hso4Y06hYlpBbI/cqQoj9c72imMhWkUxhVP+LyjOrx8lxyQ8NRH8mhX g+V8hP0BJ/KI1xS5U13kTeSQ8DqeXpsDV8vf8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.166.14 with SMTP id o14mr4839637ybe.219.1267489375550; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:22:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:22:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4c7b1781003011622r36f54030oebe38324823d02e4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Marc Farnum Rendino To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4a76cfc7d740480c65de7 --000e0cd4a76cfc7d740480c65de7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > You might find my preso I did on Hadoop at Apachecon EU last year handy... Terrific; thanks! - Marc --000e0cd4a76cfc7d740480c65de7-- From general-return-1137-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 00:29:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79380 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 00:29:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 00:29:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 56713 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56679 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 00:29:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56671 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 00:29:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:29:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:29:49 +0000 Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7so98580pvc.35 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:29:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.56.16 with SMTP id e16mr3020812wfa.109.1267489768532; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:29:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.com> References: <1703587b1002281345k118d980al3ec458cd0d74d343@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781002281418k578fabb4n81778bb0890e5c90@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781003010819v61f9a792t2ac7c8bba2ec4964@mail.gmail.com> <4c7b1781003011608r40cb6a91vaf6c88e852508032@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:29:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding hard-disks to an existing HDFS cluster From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> There's work on trunk to add a backup name node which gets a >> stream of edits from the NN so it has an update copy of the metadata. >> > > Ah; I think this is alluded to in the conf file, right? It's dfs.namenode.backup.* in conf files but you probably haven't bumped into them unless you're using trunk, they're not in 20. > Ah; I'd discounted it, because the hadoop ecosystem seems to be evolving so > fast, it seemed better to focus on online and recently-updated info. > > Maybe it's not quite that divergent yet. :) The user-facing stuff and discussion are still very pertinent. Thanks, Eli From general-return-1138-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 03:53:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28299 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 03:53:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 03:53:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 16410 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 03:53:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16162 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 03:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16152 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 03:53:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:53:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.198] (snvvpn3-10-72-77-c6.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.77.6]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o223qNt3079298; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:52:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:cc:x-mailer; b=nXiI3bcCjtG5R+JdhQqeFh3EGbJwDYP5S75PKJXf1sMcrcd/wf/sn9NP21JtMNgw Message-Id: From: Alan Gates To: pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Pig 0.6.0 released Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:52:22 -0800 Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Pig 0.6.0 is released. This release includes performance and memory usage improvements, a new Accumulator interface for UDFs, and many bug fixes. You can see the details of the release at http://hadoop.apache.org/pig/releases.html Alan. From general-return-1139-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 02 12:22:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75583 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 12:22:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 12:22:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 44633 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 12:22:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44478 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 12:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44470 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 12:22:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:22:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of drew.farris@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.186] (HELO mail-iw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.223.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:22:08 +0000 Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so119527iwn.20 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:21:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WIE9pqsHXlpWAwANR2B08m9lHDNh6yzdfeLcIWJ2CzM=; b=wQVoHQaQjDOAnbAkxrms5Yf8bpxI+tQplABGa72wBeAlmKeK9Fa07ok8Jd6OQCBHin MT9YPoQcfqwADblS1/Nd2RLi+G3tPKbJdnDYEeyFq9O/YeKmu7D0tGPXZ/Bl2pJJEmDF zdauPOdVX5eXauZwlbHvUa4hQhtFhEDkM9BNY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NtMwrxP5bqLSdViRBoo5kIwo6OyBz8P+Wwz6SdFGN0HqkXtedlRwNvJp4/hmIcxFOA lVOa2J5fp3ftEbKUBXtAvc1LHp8y8h4kUPSjAxhzWzCzd0rKodUUj0Rl3DYn6Tog2O5z xA3+ne2TDRAHMVoLIpoKrRWF5rGVuD9LcU8xE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.130 with SMTP id h2mr3924ibv.43.1267532304115; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:18:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:18:24 -0500 Message-ID: <8f8e14c41003020418s1753b966x9279bc1d457b53b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released From: Drew Farris To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Congratulations, and thanks for the 0.20.2 release. I can see the release on the mirrors, but can someone also push it to the repo at repository.apache.org? Thanks, Drew On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of > changes may be found in the release notes: > > http://bit.ly/dd6rwL > > And in JIRA: > > COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f > MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 > HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO > > Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C > From general-return-1140-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 03:43:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29531 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 03:43:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 03:43:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31703 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 03:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31670 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 03:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31662 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 03:43:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.186] (HELO mail-iw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.223.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:43:43 +0000 Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so974234iwn.20 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:43:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=MsBD1j/N9OjhWGL+I4I68R02vM86g+vAG7mYQvnOVo0=; b=hkKtF8gYe57+2dcLUTiE4ujOHOk4qmVlmpxpgUuvvElU1d0t59Dq6rMG9PIs0c7jYh 2+X4T4XaXgsL5AdwvDN9a8nq7M7DpRzBLo4KlkVOw3yToUnl589cQs9GINpYDb4dMNK4 hHyE0w9z3AubGfM/94QYV5qmW9gd6SroXpviY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=O0yL4HIQeraGLwNo5PCwT0/cOQrAqojBIM6LdEeYjeqmms8ZVmAul+JrtwhviaMn75 3MG17N4g+WtHGUXqd04nbbdiEpGqSGNZ1LG1CC33MF36SY79fpjqPXmPJSV9sqMcAVsv 6MvMyV52DvOgtAWY0skY0Z8IyeBGuFGWI+Pd0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.13 with SMTP id t13mr116816ibx.3.1267587802743; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:43:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:43:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have a 5 slave servers and I would like to be rackaware meaning each server represents 1 rack resulting in 5 racks. I have looked around for examples online but could not find anything concrete. Can someone please show me an example on how to set this up? TIA From general-return-1141-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 06:46:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44836 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 05:38:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 05:38:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 40010 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 05:37:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39793 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 05:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39785 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 05:37:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:37:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.177] (HELO mail-qy0-f177.google.com) (209.85.221.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:37:45 +0000 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so734383qyk.21 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:37:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.68 with SMTP id l4mr73267qcm.68.1267594644584; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:37:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:37:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b79a8827a520480dee009 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b79a8827a520480dee009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, Have you looked at http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/cluster_setup.html#Hadoop+Rack+Awareness? If there's something lacking in that documentation, perhaps you can submit a patch with a more useful explanation. Regards, Jeff On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > I have a 5 slave servers and I would like to be rackaware meaning each > server represents 1 rack resulting in 5 racks. I have looked around > for examples online but could not find anything concrete. Can someone > please show me an example on how to set this up? > > TIA > --0016363b79a8827a520480dee009-- From general-return-1142-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 12:12:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85730 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 12:12:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 12:12:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 17799 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:12:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17756 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17748 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 12:12:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:12:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.186] (HELO mail-iw0-f186.google.com) (209.85.223.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:12:09 +0000 Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so1268921iwn.20 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:11:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JmTkc7A2vKlXnbiGp3Sxe9M9f8xyb/VqZzA7v47Ayis=; b=NPlYs8QgTXg22MBuuS8f5HfrVVrTRhPZbGyk7XskE1HvYorT2a6b2NEAdrTlvrRdsc zbd0iqjwxdtDMkdKYd5jJqPeDuk79h62ciazrtO3kuLlColMxvs+FHqph2goXIwjMey1 TA+84a+uIyaiVjTNZG3tfxNYSSjpDYltKBxfw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=usIT3f3HYeJFxbECYPcojPuBQb6+rvNiMh4mJRve13jK5v5EfHhqcu3Y/dQB+OE4O9 TBPR0o1KJd9nZgQ34rOblXYck6ByryB5oPUCA+hhZTW7aOCviIpKmjp2PM54+rRQkIrL R2vI24xK+SFoJOnXomlElUGO7JyiHlag1+Nio= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.14 with SMTP id b14mr12242ibz.26.1267618309276; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:11:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:11:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 hello jeff: yes, I have looked at this page many times. I guess I am a bit confused with this line, "The default implementation of the same runs a script/command configured using topology.script.file.name. If topology.script.file.name is not set, the rack id /default-rack is returned for any passed IP address." Do I have to write a script which will convert my IP address into a unique rack? Once we get the unique id hdfs will write according to the id? An example would be very helpful. There is only 1 paragraph about this but its far too important not to have an example or two. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: > Hey, > > Have you looked at > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/cluster_setup.html#Hadoop+Rack+Awareness? > If there's something lacking in that documentation, perhaps you can submit a > patch with a more useful explanation. > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> I have a 5 slave servers and I would like to be rackaware meaning each >> server represents 1 rack resulting in 5 racks. I have looked around >> for examples online but could not find anything concrete. Can someone >> please show me an example on how to set this up? >> >> TIA >> > From general-return-1143-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 12:26:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90529 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 12:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 12:26:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 38547 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:26:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38519 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:26:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38511 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 12:26:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:26:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of dkumar@qasource.com) Received: from [161.58.59.72] (HELO qasource.com) (161.58.59.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:26:22 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([116.193.163.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by qasource.com (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o23CPsDA089778 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:25:59 GMT Message-ID: <4B8E55A7.80906@qasource.com> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:57:19 +0530 From: Devender User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Performance tools for Hadoop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Team, Is there anyone who can suggest any performance tools that can be used on the hadoop environment? Regards, Dev From general-return-1144-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 12:29:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91421 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 12:29:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 12:29:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 43248 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:29:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43198 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 12:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43190 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 12:29:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:29:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yangkuntime@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:29:09 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so367325qwb.35 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:28:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=r1Z3gRa2SqwjNf2J4ApwX4xkW8Ublfm2g70SPw4uRbo=; b=tS5m2d+7nJLQRDbVv6aebtHBXD85fPy8Kzgw95u1VDnLTSGQwlHC2nvV8OjjmaYw7K LNln8rggCJgJQYLXCBtYY1xYAqo5V06i5FmY12cbK3q+F09uz5sxftFDA/AzGwMI4Kcu NQOPT0dJ7zLf7FV0qm9J/kPTvhhUDhajoeKTQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vq6dxTpfMpTv4E0/vBdf6j3wm95HoQvtlYtpKur9M9ohqF21fpCI97qlDdCg3kvPZM BerwaL0vlul1ZIfvgLWtCLlPnjdRWAkJh3uLoN6WxbUtryli49qZu4LPDTYqJ5YhtxxX SArcSCr+tqaW+d3rIoCij5KOSdxlq4EVwVTIM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.81.148 with SMTP id x20mr4157904qak.311.1267619327598; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:28:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8E55A7.80906@qasource.com> References: <4B8E55A7.80906@qasource.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:28:47 +0800 Message-ID: <83c9bd211003030428j6c729864ra1f64cd18bb3cc4e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance tools for Hadoop From: Kun Yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000feaed62a1bbdab90480e49ff4 --000feaed62a1bbdab90480e49ff4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 up On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Devender wrote: > Hi Team, > > Is there anyone who can suggest any performance tools that can be used on > the hadoop environment? > > Regards, > Dev > > --000feaed62a1bbdab90480e49ff4-- From general-return-1145-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 13:04:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7130 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 13:04:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 13:04:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 8296 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 13:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8209 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 13:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8035 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 13:04:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:04:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cpbhagtani@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:04:27 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so375518qwb.35 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:04:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aVX2vF85kSE03mVjOG6EbUXTzUam041PvaUb5dyDfqE=; b=iuENCL+dxPmPcsUQIEHEM3hE+P7PvxqSrZQvk61Mibdkc7rv2LVi5HhN2HeGzlpSI5 1x7soBfnGsi0kpv+yxVyO6F0wzonvCCNBSq1rbBBw//hvQi56SWGdJ7vJ8+nxLO0gb4l GLiXgxRUO/srVAOqCedQwJhbGp9Xx4TcArXq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MTlyKwQIqId8cHf4oLdt1ZlnJDfKsYTFvNM+uSo4AXvbjWZAJXBhX/Biu9wBo4v6kC JhW8nq+n/iJs1Zg0EZn3WL490q0AhDCnrM/5kFOB5qbc6kVO6dDMJWxXKgEEkJIFfAcx /zEjyMgp+Wf7pJF302Fkdmsiuu6i92JScyPs4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.38.74 with SMTP id a10mr2204999qce.103.1267621446135; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:04:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8E55A7.80906@qasource.com> References: <4B8E55A7.80906@qasource.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:34:06 +0530 Message-ID: <4061df21003030504k6f3af613y9a0977704fae4843@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance tools for Hadoop From: Chandraprakash Bhagtani To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b826801b0010480e51e05 --0016363b826801b0010480e51e05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Devender, Currently there are 2 ways to analyze performance of hadoop cluster and jobs 1. Hadoop Vaidya: is a performance diagnostic tool for hadoop jobs which executes a set of rules against the job counters and gives a report of performance improvement areas as a result. But Hadoop Vaidya is a separate contrib module and has a limited set of rules as of now. 2. Hadoop Metrics(used with Ganglia or Nagios): All Hadoop daemons expose runtime metrics which are then analyzed by some cluster monitoring system like Ganglia or Nagios. Hadoop Metrics has a lot of dependencies on third party libraries and limited number of metrics as of now. We are enhancing Hadoop job analysis web UI which will include some features of Vaidya and Metrics as a feature in Hadoop itself. It will have no dependencies on any third party libraries. You will have complete analytic and diagnostic report of your job by just a single click. We are planning to contribute a patch soon. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Devender wrote: > Hi Team, > > Is there anyone who can suggest any performance tools that can be used on > the hadoop environment? > > Regards, > Dev > > -- Thanks & Regards, Chandra Prakash Bhagtani, Impetus Infotech (india) Pvt Ltd. --0016363b826801b0010480e51e05-- From general-return-1146-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 16:57:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87244 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 16:57:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 16:57:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 80241 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80209 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80201 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 16:57:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:57:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:57:02 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=YrGsyH3qtMOeuI6WjzhVKo+3Fk1jTMBC6AIakqqyG7B1r6iDtw71Rj+3 fwjOHkuGohQ1XBTMM6VNjUiUYwmQgXYwKMTLwKBts01HQpydu1DeRVXDR fkXoZE8hdIxmQ8B; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267635422; x=1299171422; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20help|Date:=20Wed,=20 03=20Mar=202010=2008:55:49=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding: =207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c 162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com>; bh=0WG6RVmx23UeQDl6+9ITqNLhS8h8lADiTraD/4Mli0Q=; b=xIi34lBI0heOstdLo+sriOw9ObShuO8bOqggGIEfkHTMqu+Kn7ShJTLy OM92S0dqncpesjIZKRgMKvR6Gz4hJB9EUJJ1YycVHVfc2d3M0uV3DSUvD m0NDO4ZmFyAZEDg; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,574,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11513357" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:55:51 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:55:49 -0800 Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: rack awareness help Thread-Index: Acq68mAQg6WkS1WE3kCWO1cOOqmtuQ== In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003021943j6438bd26i72c9c162d7e3e5a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/2/10 7:43 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > I have a 5 slave servers and I would like to be rackaware meaning each > server represents 1 rack resulting in 5 racks. I have looked around > for examples online but could not find anything concrete. Can someone > please show me an example on how to set this up? You're in luck. If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every node as if it was its own rack. From general-return-1147-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 16:58:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87801 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 16:58:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 16:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 83048 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82984 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82976 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 16:58:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:58:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:58:02 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=ADyGxNy+rKBdkEMHJcMaq+3SvrHICcEG9fMHBwv4z2DZunnjW7ictp0B 2JzXFT9UcxxHc5Fr91GZmPQrbKKLTwy9uWB/zG+qym0U6A1S5ZfXmcEeR 3GwMRbGCx3FGDwT; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267635482; x=1299171482; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20help|Date:=20Wed,=20 03=20Mar=202010=2008:57:33=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding: =207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123 d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com>; bh=w6tOj+7TOrT+h3+4CR7ORdUftYyNutQoOtYLHuOTmJU=; b=kOFAeCr30MixQGMtDKA8kYaLDACaGKPMGQoByAV34gIMVS9HqGKd7KZf 9iJdm0Ceb8un9wm9Iv/cPYhFiX4KPGksjR/YUv6sk9FKT8tcH6YRHUazm dI+hDmVZIjPHLam; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,574,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11513387" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:57:34 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:57:33 -0800 Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: rack awareness help Thread-Index: Acq68p4NhLesKoA2rkCasDJ2E0C1ng== In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/3/10 4:11 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > An example would be very helpful. There is only 1 paragraph about this > but its far too important not to have an example or two. I covered this in my preso to apachecon last year: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations?action=AttachFile&do=view& target=aw-apachecon-eu-2009.pdf aka http://bit.ly/d3UU4A You might find the example in/out helpful. No code, but it is (seriously) trivial to write. From general-return-1148-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 18:08:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10454 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 18:08:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 18:08:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 42735 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 18:08:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42701 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 18:08:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42685 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 18:08:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:08:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:08:06 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.151]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o23I6QML050697; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:07:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; b=vxhqrrk1zLzJ3hfnJGE9Ql5Lnm961fzlFjvMNnIWf/1ZVjZRDb9h3PkukomBr/2u Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas03.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.151]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:06:51 -0800 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:06:50 -0800 Subject: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - March 24th at Yahoo! Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group (Bay Area) - March 24th at Yahoo! Thread-Index: AcoSMRRU8X5auVLKR8ufbpFTQi1hLgQXaiyQCpfO4pAWCVl24AV6I0+g Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDE3FBF3A@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> References: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4E1AC69A91@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FD39F6EDF@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDBF8B10A@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FDBF8B10A@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, RSVP is open for the next monthly Bay Area Hadoop user group at the Yahoo! = Sunnyvale Campus, Wednesday, March 24th, 6PM Please note that due to the growing demand we are moving the meeting locati= on to a larger facility *Building C, Second Floor, Classroom 5*=20 (It's in the same campus, just cross the street and walk pass building D to= Building C) Registration and Agenda are available here http://www.meetup.com/hadoop/calendar/12710846/ Looking forward to seeing you there! Dekel From general-return-1149-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 19:09:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43752 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 19:09:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 19:09:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 63289 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 19:09:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63260 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 19:09:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63252 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 19:09:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:09:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of neilbliss@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:09:33 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so1899906pzk.2 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:09:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zFdk6uXT6EpfIhglOflV1Xt6wA3xWP7ZuZ2Q3+Cbjj8=; b=i765aMPyDY8i2zJF0qnJJ1JPkc/AbEQlFol7SssMprFz6xWCb/GHc1UEffLpLfgli6 WnWAmPgcb/JNomXTYM92KrwPjOc5WvmKFwphn9G20Hwfyj0B1s1o80gskP9T8JXHiJan REQrKgaXunPN8LLmnhKgWF2KLU/VHFrQbnNL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uOjlTuFItGwB82xEIf8PnihzACYIg0RaUKqkcaiLbo/NB57OXMzY3z8yuYWwvnQQYg QMOlas+PUtlSxEOled/zW9P5uJOeCkK37qp3ZNMLacRreojTyFpLZ7EVGIMXsyKQx0if p+tJoHO5qFODjHTuQoH0+H7rRb5HWqDRDIL6Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.98.13 with SMTP id a13mr4663199wam.88.1267643351907; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:09:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:09:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Neil Bliss To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649d552b1403a0480ea379e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e649d552b1403a0480ea379e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On 3/3/10 4:11 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > > An example would be very helpful. There is only 1 paragraph about this > > but its far too important not to have an example or two. > > I covered this in my preso to apachecon last year: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations?action=AttachFile&do=view& > target=aw-apachecon-eu-2009.pdf > > aka > > http://bit.ly/d3UU4A > > You might find the example in/out helpful. No code, but it is (seriously) > trivial to write. > So in the "rack awareness" output, are there meaningful distance metrics that should be provided, or is it simply a "local rack vs. non-local rack" determination? thanks, Neil --0016e649d552b1403a0480ea379e-- From general-return-1150-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 03 20:54:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69065 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 20:54:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 20:54:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 87831 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 20:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87792 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 20:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87784 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 20:54:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:54:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:54:13 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:53:50 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:53:49 +0100 Subject: Dutch Hadoop scientific user group? Thread-Topic: Dutch Hadoop scientific user group? Thread-Index: AQHKuxOfN0xMa7AJaEWY7HcfJO4pCA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, As the Dutch Center for High Performance Computing & Networking we (SARA - = http://www.sara.nl) are experimenting with a number of new technologies and= paradigms, among which Hadoop. At the moment our experiments are limited t= o an (also experimental and OpenNebula based) HPC cloud infrastructure, whi= ch is obviously sub-optimal, and we are considering our options. We are interested to know whether Hadoop is being used by scientists based = in The Netherlands, and if so, how and for what it is used. If people are i= nterested and we can reach a certain number of users, we will be able to or= ganize and host a Dutch Hadoop scientific user group. I can be reached on this email address and by both telephone numbers listed= below. Best regards, Evert Lammerts Adviseur SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization eScience Support Group Office phone: +31 20 888 4101 Mobile phone: +31 61 055 8303= From general-return-1151-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 01:02:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51415 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 01:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 01:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2719 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 01:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2682 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 01:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2674 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 01:02:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:02:03 +0000 Received: by gyb13 with SMTP id 13so894103gyb.35 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VrTOF4tTY/nDTktT04qNBBXYiSxY53dhuXYcgfAhIK4=; b=aZyLcjuGIKVoK7ecmqfGDbak5Gq3PfOFaTLEaXG6Cqn3e0gn9LLq2fX2yRyINcng1Z 1nE1LXnlm2pejfP82A0pmOyq6M2DR9XbFK7dvYxlrfBh9L9iOFxe0IeLmFCxn/RJRHL3 fhOwk2S0RvHbJ6mv6ZyUt4zynWfm1wOkSGkxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TvIO3l4ruuU8qHBKIw6+Togk8dDpdc7XN4rZ2i9KQpcguYbdCvx9+T3nEtVFr76aom qqjDjD3F2HK3rSG/YAQuNn6cI7gPNfejXA2VVXh3lwfCImOgYhqHyaydO1fN7nqtmwew XeUP+fknjgRQjOZynd9bidgMtJaPSYYVlKrXc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.127.16 with SMTP id z16mr1732045ybc.152.1267664500879; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:01:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003031701x5f218995t9a428d7777add9a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and the report still says only 1 rack. Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and a sample syntax? TIA On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > > On 3/3/10 4:11 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >> An example would be very helpful. There is only 1 paragraph about this >> but its far too important not to have an example or two. > > I covered this in my preso to apachecon last year: > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations?action=3DAttachFile&do= =3Dview& > target=3Daw-apachecon-eu-2009.pdf > > aka > > http://bit.ly/d3UU4A > > You might find the example in/out helpful. =C2=A0No code, but it is (seri= ously) > trivial to write. > > > From general-return-1152-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 01:09:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55285 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 01:09:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 01:09:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 10915 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 01:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10880 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 01:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10872 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 01:09:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:09:22 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([131.215.207.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o23NwVax000437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:58:32 -0800 Message-ID: <4B8F082C.3070804@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:09:00 -0800 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100225 Fedora/3.0.2-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: <1cbd6f831003030411i161b11e1o7b123d5dd4ccfed9@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003031701x5f218995t9a428d7777add9a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003031701x5f218995t9a428d7777add9a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050107030105040900080405" --------------ms050107030105040900080405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =46rom what I've observed, if you don't provide a script for rack awareness, hadoop treats all nodes as if they belong the the same rack. Here is the section in hadoop-site xml where we define our rack awareness script: topology.script.file.name /usr/bin/ip-to-rack.sh This is the ip-to-rack.sh script that we use on our cluster. It assumes that the reverse lookup of the IP returns a hostname of the form 'compute-x-y', where 'x' is the rack id. This type of naming is common for Rocks-managed clusters: #!/bin/sh # The default rule assumes that the nodes are connected to the PDU and switch # located in the same rack. Only the exceptions need to be # explicitly listed here. for ip in $@ ; do hostname=3D`nslookup $ip | grep "name =3D" | awk '{print $4}' | sed -= e 's/\.local\.$//' ` case $hostname in compute-14-3) rack=3D"/Rack15" ;; *) rack=3D`echo $hostname | sed -e 's/^[a-z]*-\([0-9]*\)-[0-9]*.*/\/Rack\1/'` ;; esac echo $rack done Hope this helps, --Mike On 03/03/2010 05:01 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >=20 > "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every > node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and > the report still says only 1 rack. >=20 >=20 > Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and > a sample syntax? >=20 > TIA >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/3/10 4:11 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>> An example would be very helpful. There is only 1 paragraph about thi= s >>> but its far too important not to have an example or two. >> >> I covered this in my preso to apachecon last year: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations?action=3DAttachFile&= do=3Dview& >> target=3Daw-apachecon-eu-2009.pdf >> >> aka >> >> http://bit.ly/d3UU4A >> >> You might find the example in/out helpful. No code, but it is (seriou= sly) >> trivial to write. >> >> >> --------------ms050107030105040900080405 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwMzA0MDEw OTAwWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUi9SpjOgoVv8dQC3p6Y0y3iHMNnYwXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBADb66A4KCGTz/QVv3JMn 2IOdQdLFViDAS5TF6wI9dJcHQKULRNOXhm0cVqf+NAUru29M6mKoipwg+5RczbxcRc4qzDJD cAI2gYyiGdD11KM/6Ux1bYXap9oVgDBvS9QeYbpY9Ur+ltH0dJtFJ8C2ZZ+xPsWK0foE3NgH Bz1uiFjvtHhB5NGHawiAb9DGoReUecWAD+8xaox6T+N6S2ml8qcZd1ZbtUCeCvVt9zTK7HVF EGgUPxvn7nGYI1/Cq+OU2jog8pb/IEpZcvcgkMEueZ7DCAa81u/BAeJPvdtXWzvcarpRLt/4 RKw+aALxTWXXtUwBtMSZeAW/rPZJTfmyAd0AAAAAAAA= --------------ms050107030105040900080405-- From general-return-1153-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 03:54:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86059 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 03:54:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 03:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 24765 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 03:54:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24673 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 03:54:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24665 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 03:54:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:54:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.192] (HELO mail-iw0-f192.google.com) (209.85.223.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:54:06 +0000 Received: by iwn30 with SMTP id 30so1795872iwn.32 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:53:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=I23orDpkLe+Bed2a6fhLCBUysBQwUaIkQ8rW0aPeyj0=; b=oUBGW9se3rpXSSFuHiT2x6qr6RS1kF/Lp5HzwwuIkFZETngnSMk2n6Keb+a7x0BmuU 0lRwZvehj8wtL5LtUJZ9eGO1ZZmzBJaS+Tr+FynW8IVDBDIslr0jdYqLmH6InJvuK76s P6428H8yppHNdtYMzJTBDen+ig0fY5j+csluk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=G3pplpg1qJ0amiXNEhXs00n5vPik70GUItsaLBUfX7/RAAGUWuWnHkw/qJKovtnaGI 5gYVGMuNfttlMTJ9GnHskNNoZCKuqTug0VCVnFNohVXzDIBEDATHF9gmNovwjxJ+2LJv IJsCB1b9rDmz3Y2tpH1zRzeYn3xtcrj0K64Aw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.146.203 with SMTP id i11mr200113ibv.19.1267674825082; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:53:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:53:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003031953p7462a54bq1cd5194ba00bf22a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: setting a proper threshold From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I plan to setup HDFS on 20 servers. I plan on using /fs for my data. I want /fs to have atleast 20% free therefore I don't want this filesystem to be filled up with hdfs data. Is there a way to restrict hadoop so it does not write here if the filesystem is over 80%? TIA From general-return-1154-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 05:22:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2581 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 05:22:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 05:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 75675 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 05:22:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75370 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 05:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75362 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 05:22:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:22:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:22:23 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=YU9PHbmwQzjqUbDEpmbMshBaN/4O1mAnbLRRaF55wcQwnpm77oYQY69N OBhKiIJlY2CgHTPT1OVMKWkDfTX1cwmxtV3ZwxuT625HzjDZHwjpms3AU 1ydmsPgjCAXlD+t; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267680143; x=1299216143; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20help|Date:=20Wed,=20 03=20Mar=202010=2021:21:21=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding: =207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<1cbd6f831003031701x5f218995t9a428 d7777add9a@mail.gmail.com>; bh=FDZkDeIYx6WU97WSvQjnholKSOtjKRScWAtV6Y5Mgt4=; b=c/zIVga1iWfOGumHR+fkiIzEEAxmdzMGkFI7CTHP4nWWS999PR8/hBkt F4qAjMhg3BtX1oW6cpqFqHa3oHc3n5oxFr7Uub75mtHMBblkjm0JmuAy+ l4vE1w6P0Tj6AIk; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,579,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11527244" Received: from 172.18.36.181 ([172.18.36.181]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:21:22 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:21:21 -0800 Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: rack awareness help Thread-Index: Acq7WoZpLtlJdHl8LEG2THkbEpxcIw== In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003031701x5f218995t9a428d7777add9a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! Thanks. :) > "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every > node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and > the report still says only 1 rack. Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) Think about the question: Is there a difference between all nodes in one rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all copies of the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every node would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. So there is no difference. > Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and > a sample syntax? Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) From general-return-1155-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 08:07:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41082 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 08:07:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 08:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 19557 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 08:07:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19466 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 08:07:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19455 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 08:07:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:07:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:07:22 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1153006wwb.35 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:07:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=P0RPT5Gk/QA96ca4c2YKBYdYdDaELRGzu+IseQ5WFOw=; b=fWP5M8MpyE8p0EP8t/kSqC4+t2UVsUJmN3pHuHmoRrtM+8UNC6/f3Xs3/BSsffCbQf Yvf5hE2qTxIPk1FA68gTiWyeHnPzQcpP9Bo6eP9Fun/kuHq+s2k9wwPypl+z9t1livSv f+P95OtCrrH+SM0/jSUgyC/Us1FH8Pbw4M/oI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oa80oPYWgWh+jNW75lwVu1UWX/AigtRAAcjyI6Q5uHb3FaETLPnm7j/AbkY1/p6z/U WDz2kHU20PbLOHD25TP5oNU7TyotWkg+1pgADE6aDe5J6odp1Fum1rBHjU9lrVGkShxg yFo6hTXgQNtGB3JUYfJmlzsW3iGttFI5pAyL4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.79 with SMTP id z57mr1549817wee.22.1267690020642; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:07:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003031953p7462a54bq1cd5194ba00bf22a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cbd6f831003031953p7462a54bq1cd5194ba00bf22a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:07:00 -0500 Message-ID: <9db00c201003040007j4971215w4f0e619cf36b1ebb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: setting a proper threshold From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can't you just set quotas for the user you run HDFS as? On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > I plan to setup HDFS on 20 servers. I plan on using /fs for my data. I > want /fs to have atleast 20% free therefore I don't want this > filesystem to be filled up with hdfs data. Is there a way to restrict > hadoop so it does not write here if the filesystem is =A0over 80%? > > TIA > From general-return-1156-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 12:03:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8440 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 12:03:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 12:03:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 3300 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 12:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3149 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 12:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3141 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 12:03:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:03:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:03:27 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so882915vws.35 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:03:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5wXhoAnqi2D7Xj44UECp7oF+99aEbOCuJutBvbJ+4o0=; b=p2P2JAFocuL0W846Ggv+3WLG8WsqcHkp+BSDCPzLCAafLw4kGkVTAIJh2THSrrr3rM lAAFgA7Gyyq50H2qJ1xSRg5sYRWFYxc2Ia8IFDlQNXJbY7C5dpN621j5Q7CGNq8cXZuU czYZdgZybFnIaU44c9OkwRPRmLQ4x0oMvljJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t2j9bHKJJM5Sb5Rvj6a+URTSktUrhSQAbszoxPNSJKTzEtv2+4pYWWn7hru7frZorS DqIK5hgkd7t39PbG5BD0G+QkSAbCDYE1HtHjAynfH2As7keaIIITV9A63J8B8pkqG5Sv tceFLj4TK1ERAEK9jXBSH/EIaLqhRzuBZqSTI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.122.169 with SMTP id l41mr888487vcr.175.1267704186114; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:03:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003040007j4971215w4f0e619cf36b1ebb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cbd6f831003031953p7462a54bq1cd5194ba00bf22a@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003040007j4971215w4f0e619cf36b1ebb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:03:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003040403k6f3320bk41eafd12fa6f6802@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: setting a proper threshold From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you mean filesystem quotas I don't have root access On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrot= e: > Can't you just set quotas for the user you run HDFS as? > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> I plan to setup HDFS on 20 servers. I plan on using /fs for my data. I >> want /fs to have atleast 20% free therefore I don't want this >> filesystem to be filled up with hdfs data. Is there a way to restrict >> hadoop so it does not write here if the filesystem is =C2=A0over 80%? >> >> TIA >> > From general-return-1157-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 14:21:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54796 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 14:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 14:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 62756 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 14:21:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62719 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 14:21:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62711 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 14:21:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:21:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:21:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A621B7F15 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:21:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id E361Bf3lYEzq for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:21:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11CFB7F14 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:21:12 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1268317259.02421@Lib4ERslxFTzZdEirHewKQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o24EKvDT026524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:20:58 GMT Message-ID: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:21:00 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o24EKvDT026524 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allen Wittenauer wrote: > On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > >> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! > > Thanks. :) > >> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every >> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and >> the report still says only 1 rack. > > Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) > > Think about the question: Is there a difference between all nodes in one > rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? > > The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all copies of > the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every node > would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. > > So there is no difference. > > >> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and >> a sample syntax? > > Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1.1.* for rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP address by the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.2" for rack 2; Hadoop will be happy From general-return-1158-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 15:25:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76743 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 15:25:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 15:25:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 4468 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 15:25:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4428 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 15:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4420 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 15:25:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:25:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.149] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:25:23 +0000 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o24FGEGR021108 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:16:14 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o24FObWo106140 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:24:42 -0700 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o248Oack031493 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:24:36 -0700 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o248OafZ031490 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:24:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Hadoop 0.20.2 - New Mockito jar in lib ? - And discovering the reason for new jars in general X-KeepSent: 3AFEBF5F:5933463E-862576DC:0053C094; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:24:35 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/04/2010 08:24:36, Serialize complete at 03/04/2010 08:24:36 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0054A5AF862576DC_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0054A5AF862576DC_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks I notice in 0.20.2 we now have a new jar in the lib called mockito-all-1.8.0 (mockito.org states it is a Java Test mock-up framework). In the interest of teaching this man to fish, in cases such as this, how can I determine the reason for the addition of this jar to the release ? I've taken a look at the JIRA tickets in the bundled CHANGES.txt, but its not immediately obvious without opening up every single patch within every single mentioned ticket. Is there another, more efficient means ? Kind regards Steve Watt --=_alternative 0054A5AF862576DC_=-- From general-return-1159-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 16:02:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89237 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 16:02:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 16:02:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 86549 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 16:02:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86518 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 16:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86509 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 16:02:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:02:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:01:56 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so2652249pzk.2 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:01:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.14.6 with SMTP id r6mr5346275rvi.280.1267718495092; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:01:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:01:15 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71003040801o2abb50cbt76027cc6ab9a410e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 - New Mockito jar in lib ? - And discovering the reason for new jars in general To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd112529341e60480fbb6a0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd112529341e60480fbb6a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Stephen, You can consult the svn logs for ivy.xml. The dependency on mockito was backported with HDFS-927 to enable those tests. -Todd On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Stephen Watt wrote: > Hi Folks > > I notice in 0.20.2 we now have a new jar in the lib called > mockito-all-1.8.0 (mockito.org states it is a Java Test mock-up > framework). In the interest of teaching this man to fish, in cases such as > this, how can I determine the reason for the addition of this jar to the > release ? I've taken a look at the JIRA tickets in the bundled > CHANGES.txt, but its not immediately obvious without opening up every > single patch within every single mentioned ticket. Is there another, more > efficient means ? > > Kind regards > Steve Watt --000e0cd112529341e60480fbb6a0-- From general-return-1160-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 17:42:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30104 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 17:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 17:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 98702 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 17:42:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98670 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 17:42:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98662 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 17:42:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:42:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:41:52 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=L8MHzaJINiVTF6Bnkfh/jcfv+ENNYUFH1wO4xmGqZa52zNrjRrJ2qcOB MsfjCqdWyQAW8ptCUXJBp5IVQTzm/VcSYRhv8MrpXKP4BuJp9lVkIweRr ERZypvsqV+8Cqxs; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1267724512; x=1299260512; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Hadoop=200.20.2=20-=20New=20Mockito=20j ar=20in=20lib=20?=20-=20And=20discovering=20the=0D=0A=20r eason=20for=20new=20jars=20in=20general|Date:=20Thu,=2004 =20Mar=202010=2009:41:33=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=20 7bit|In-Reply-To:=20; bh=klpKd7+Qssf4aAaP42Dp2b5fFfxlTFS6tNt7yOphQVQ=; b=JkZmJ12aGSfzlIUCjbJRjPYIcWPaLN7o/6UgWYdRnR0l3PKNFJoEw7P2 u0ecw5sBLE5U76nUGIjw5wIjsYpi4/OdPmlCcMxWoF2p5R44FTXFKaMIH PjaTR+PM7ogv3fO; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,582,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11536346" Received: from 172.18.36.184 ([172.18.36.184]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:41:32 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:41:33 -0800 Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 - New Mockito jar in lib ? - And discovering the reason for new jars in general From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Hadoop 0.20.2 - New Mockito jar in lib ? - And discovering the reason for new jars in general Thread-Index: Acq7we4HHtXAEzstq0aFR9xOjocAEQ== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/4/10 7:24 AM, "Stephen Watt" wrote: > I notice in 0.20.2 we now have a new jar in the lib called > mockito-all-1.8.0 (mockito.org states it is a Java Test mock-up > framework). In the interest of teaching this man to fish, in cases such as > this, how can I determine the reason for the addition of this jar to the > release ? I've taken a look at the JIRA tickets in the bundled > CHANGES.txt, but its not immediately obvious without opening up every > single patch within every single mentioned ticket. Is there another, more > efficient means ? You'll eventually get used to things that are in the release notes being incomplete. :/ That said, they are still worlds ahead where we were in the early days when we didn't have any at all. :) From general-return-1161-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 04 23:39:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38099 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 23:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 23:39:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3454 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 23:39:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3394 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 23:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3386 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 23:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.192] (HELO mail-iw0-f192.google.com) (209.85.223.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:39:31 +0000 Received: by iwn30 with SMTP id 30so2297124iwn.32 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:39:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6HXzDADlXNcC3/xVzRviNkJb6FrdJQFGyZFXjeOwf3o=; b=Hb/y6TJrBI0AXQTq1X7k7G9NEcCnjvl9KI8iP53VyxDnY09/Um562/9MnHsWzBnkzS usNv+hTFxb3pmU2yvGyQ5ri37wVPHXmNtyQWEPSePShvTbZD60T68Dn2LV74tjGp7CdT cuf5krozO6OUC5LvocomEMq68c3uEYIFGD4v0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gVvJcZV4pnYuH9BeejsOExFjymFiYKerSTkg3OlaldyBa2/w0mydBKAzAEHcWIRtXP zGSp8HVZhZZdBw1JXkNfpfaweUHO+DWl/FtVC2eBA8vF7OYMJ7C9+YNcuuW7eZDaz4QO L/rVDcHDVwwhE51thNo4jOxNZWEYFqUbxd4pY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.136 with SMTP id d8mr946711ibz.17.1267745950683; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:39:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! I will play around with it and see how far I get. On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >> >> Thanks. :) >> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >> >> Think about the question: =C2=A0Is there a difference between all nodes = in one >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =C2=A0In both cases, all c= opies >> of >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every nod= e >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >> >> So there is no difference. >> >> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and >>> a sample syntax? >> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >> > > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. > > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1.1.* = for > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP address b= y > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.2" fo= r > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy > From general-return-1162-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 05 02:30:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91387 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 02:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 02:30:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 60455 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 02:30:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60416 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 02:30:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60408 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 02:30:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:30:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.204] (HELO mail-qy0-f204.google.com) (209.85.221.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:30:35 +0000 Received: by qyk42 with SMTP id 42so730953qyk.29 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:30:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.230.84 with SMTP id jl20mr39438qcb.88.1267756213488; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:30:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:30:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Jeff Hammerbacher To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630ff21c44edc0481047e4e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163630ff21c44edc0481047e4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Mag, Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improve the existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6616. If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added to the existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out sooner. Thanks, Jeff On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! > > I will play around with it and see how far I get. > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Allen Wittenauer wrote: > >> > >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! > >> > >> Thanks. :) > >> > >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every > >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and > >>> the report still says only 1 rack. > >> > >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) > >> > >> Think about the question: Is there a difference between all nodes in > one > >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? > >> > >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all copies > >> of > >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every > node > >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. > >> > >> So there is no difference. > >> > >> > >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? and > >>> a sample syntax? > >> > >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) > >> > > > > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. > > > > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1.1.* > for > > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP address > by > > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.2" > for > > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy > > > --00163630ff21c44edc0481047e4e-- From general-return-1163-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 05 19:34:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44536 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 19:34:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 19:34:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 94523 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94466 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94458 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 19:33:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.165] (HELO web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:33:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 77651 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Mar 2010 19:33:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267817603; bh=x91+DKEGE6nuNFUQnqAhvW5Sp9arm0Mc7M95sMHoLPo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=drRu3ylIRFiQIaewpo3oDKsF8HAj6f4/3zVW5FzueKYz9r8sOLqfmjmevXUa3PBDRfqVJhrLlK1M412JGDgja0L/NqjzK7srN+8oPdTYt76YQXPZHngwlcXO8JzMzhRjJuEXkrgKycwm1+O0h40oyFV0TscqNPbpOrdy/9oXR4c= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZF9q7O8JyX0GUmGDIIvt2jbE1atHJ8J5PfLNxNsvwNYruNyTRG+vnFtHB4j42F7ucn+Kvd/G41Q3WrLmTaePisa6lVMXvPZm/8gD292Q8EpnAN6c0am2gu3ZPyniZi5SCBdbD9Uxa5d/tDeRXhzjRiLrKggMt1MDRkRczxgLvbA=; Message-ID: <555270.77646.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: QfUuGzQVM1k6k3mgAMPYERJ211zQwjHDqjtxc2ysjMffwmQ KXxs79vppdsGbfZ0Ba16ZrsHm7JbqWN1gkt4yUJ.3TktWr27Ml59LZThAeAN ..DRHD0qI8qny7UelJ7CFaEj_.idmSxT9LEzoXWfNI90zRAUTcASdAfJdkJj xELAoRLAoHFbOS1wPthjpl6cRLMfH.tW.HSey3h3LlRenYL3TmFWatVLJOIJ PuBFAh_WpiFWo_hwHbFyNSKsmoXTS6HwYSIe94EEsFKzwki6oD6qSDLc6tvD fmnRifdmA3BvDzJ79ybHs.AlV4cRVCJdGTu6HAxvcqGRx0FTIfeSqdQcLMk1 VReWZSppYEYeQV7i6xPadJnnD4pcX Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:33:23 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:33:23 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: How to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2? To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I would like to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2. I am at http://mirrors.devlib.org/apache/hadoop/core/hadoop-0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2. It shows me the "src" directory. However, I am not able to download the source code there after I clicked the src. Can someone direct me where I can get the entire source code of hadoop-0.20.2? Thanks, Gary From general-return-1164-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 05 19:38:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45598 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 19:38:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 19:38:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2865 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:37:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2831 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:37:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2823 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 19:37:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:37:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:37:41 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so2397497pwi.35 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:37:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UscuIxMNFVSt+tCbOHJJDfD7DiEbeKIR78al+3XSSZY=; b=pEohmIpjWlAUANPpJK12KHBaaIDd6MV/NVqv+nEjutyppAJZH9D4cZeVkyyIcwrBaC sjX/ae8jG9juJ68Z+4VtHFaW0n6LoqNIHRza7pXjjHe9dfAYuOBG4cH+8x12Dc00QVq5 ko0dxTf4lhQ8A9le9Ey4LzDPZ17sZwJcDfRnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mTLcPflbdAc5k+mHJcji2Q/8qfZ7L8pIRWseGDcMSxLTnKP31MWdm0RixJCoPcqnMx oBy5LCSGdPi7p9R5ehmflvRH42mcIZesO4Qh/nNcwPoH1Umfy7zP9ohdqb/5yc5m0dO0 DSRkECpUbrU2WCwbiJUiSL0c5H+9CAS82Hxk8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.122.6 with SMTP id u6mr940839wfc.8.1267817840433; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:37:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <555270.77646.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <555270.77646.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:37:20 -0800 Message-ID: <17e273101003051137q45aac6d7hc0df8284910da205@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2? From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0ba0304d96a048112d824 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636e0ba0304d96a048112d824 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Download hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz and expand it. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Gary Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2. I am at > http://mirrors.devlib.org/apache/hadoop/core/hadoop-0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2. > It shows me the "src" directory. However, I am not able to download the > source code there after I clicked the src. Can someone direct me where I can > get the entire source code of hadoop-0.20.2? > > > Thanks, > > > Gary > > > > > --001636e0ba0304d96a048112d824-- From general-return-1165-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 05 19:39:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45774 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 19:39:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 19:39:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 4090 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:38:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4058 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 19:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3967 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 19:38:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:38:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:38:43 +0000 Received: by gyb13 with SMTP id 13so1792763gyb.35 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:38:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.137.5 with SMTP id p5mr2042198ann.198.1267817902252; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:38:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <555270.77646.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <555270.77646.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Philip Zeyliger Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:38:02 -0800 Message-ID: <15da8a101003051138k60b1fb50rb148b0f63029b40e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e680b372b42131048112db90 --0016e680b372b42131048112db90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The source code is in the "regular" tarball. For example, http://mirror.cloudera.com/apache/hadoop/core/hadoop-0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2.tar.gz On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Gary Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to download the source code of hadoop-0.20.2. I am at > http://mirrors.devlib.org/apache/hadoop/core/hadoop-0.20.2/hadoop-0.20.2. > It shows me the "src" directory. However, I am not able to download the > source code there after I clicked the src. Can someone direct me where I can > get the entire source code of hadoop-0.20.2? > > > Thanks, > > > Gary > > > > > --0016e680b372b42131048112db90-- From general-return-1166-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 05 23:48:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9838 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 23:48:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 23:48:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 21038 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 23:48:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20990 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 23:48:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20982 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 23:48:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.170] (HELO web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 78244 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Mar 2010 23:47:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267832878; bh=769AXqYTtvWB4vB8J+czAVJdw8GgBbr394jCsBkyZEY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R4zpZVJB++E3dJ/oBM8hhnkZvkVgK0HJLywJxLKa+wVvYKBBEr9E9F/RajlUtRjYptNx8GUzvHCiRnJ0eajtaafRxtSKf9N2Galm8nNOouz3j/ASsfcIs39KXRKshPmyXM+mLUv5RQRIBF1Rmpv2itS+kmG3yIZO6zxz0Dd9V1k= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GtNR3YaZvVs81sdpWnfk0EJuJ40P/4F/891l7K0EZc/ErxWglR6igMzamow1fZOZ88RhxaTOoUFmbO3KQBaB83PpOb2G9SFPpGBF1DFVROMevCWr9NzegSH8FS8/QDtfQhQYSnQ0QQt40/n0NK/HmGYbbgtGul91i7kMBRqXm8c=; Message-ID: <622128.78209.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 3iaU97sVM1lMe94dQP7nB0Wds2qB8kUP3uQ21VDuJYygPqY uWg1NFAJ_Ntf94SKHEyzpdrtDVOJqdx3YRP_fIr9.wbwbgXUKgTBuYDhsjFu A2t07k_rfgPwZSedShtgcSvs2hO2FwtT_6EeKilxzN.utl47r6LUWBvMnCOR VYy83Bq9.R7drxTvRNsSwYCVw4.cz8ejARJ0JmyVoVeip2ZLzHp6rPPOUwac qvINfLCDRusx3aKZMHgGxCIF_PMzilhHjs.DvUEmFl_j8TpjPqQAI9j3NJH2 Wc7ogrxcvIGTN7DBK7jmhH5_lANLV4zFalWs6uaZLZ5OPwlUV0kS0Aao- Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:47:58 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:47:58 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I try to compile hadoop common of the release 0.20.2. Below are the error messages and java and ant versions I am using. Please tell me what I missed. ...... [javadoc] Standard Doclet version 1.6.0_18 [javadoc] Building tree for all the packages and classes... [javadoc] Building index for all the packages and classes... [javadoc] Building index for all classes... java5.check: BUILD FAILED /hadoop_src/common/build.xml:908: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. echo $JAVA_HOME /usr/java/latest which java /usr/java/latest/bin/java /usr/java/latest/bin/java -version java version "1.6.0_18" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_18-b07) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 16.0-b13, mixed mode) ant -version Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on June 27 2008 Thanks, Gary From general-return-1167-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 06 00:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17163 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 00:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 00:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 42724 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:17:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42696 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:17:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42688 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 00:17:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:17:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.201] (HELO mail-px0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:17:40 +0000 Received: by pxi39 with SMTP id 39so1439552pxi.29 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:17:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L+Z/1dyHnvSuaEzCH+I4NGUoTp63OcI5+V81GpOA4ds=; b=vpOwddTqh4AW8/9Ra3pjlOtVOgjN/v8sfotT/TVB31i4kedQd6adzKRo0nJVD/twIw oqNIb7Ozy7kaXm2s7FroJugUipLoWacEtZfPe6YMM6QMDI0V0k2AwpxJFLlxLPiJyIvP OZ++QtBtv6p1sGUqXDMs4JBJBqT8g15YmDvgc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=htlQax7XiOgHkq5d1/YEZ74cAZqsuHrwmK16iETFv03b7aTfkimkG3iDRmBl+Bet7r 9TTok6j+fsRa6+INmatqPeC8LKCzqxe/JV6X8btlAP3zUElqdj9C3RPCiNwo+iohNp89 MYPjhMaLbFjWyeZCcDMG62t+WP2nE/u37obdA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.121.2 with SMTP id t2mr1116347wfc.100.1267834640069; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:17:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <622128.78209.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <622128.78209.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:17:19 -0800 Message-ID: <17e273101003051617j3348d557r2ff23208ac1d8d9f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0ab1a5af4b4048116c1e6 --001636e0ab1a5af4b4048116c1e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Did you first try 'ant jar' from under /hadoop_src ? On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release 0.20.2. Below are the error > messages and java and ant versions I am using. Please tell me what I missed. > > ...... > > [javadoc] Standard Doclet version 1.6.0_18 > [javadoc] Building tree for all the packages and classes... > [javadoc] Building index for all the packages and classes... > [javadoc] Building index for all classes... > > java5.check: > > BUILD FAILED > /hadoop_src/common/build.xml:908: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest > requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to > Ant on the command-line. > > > echo $JAVA_HOME > /usr/java/latest > > which java > /usr/java/latest/bin/java > > /usr/java/latest/bin/java -version > java version "1.6.0_18" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_18-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 16.0-b13, mixed mode) > > ant -version > Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on June 27 2008 > > > Thanks, > > > Gary > > > > > > > --001636e0ab1a5af4b4048116c1e6-- From general-return-1168-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 06 00:33:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20803 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 00:33:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 00:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 55936 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:32:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55905 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 00:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55897 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 00:32:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:32:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:32:53 +0000 Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pU0n1d00F0Fqzac57cYa1X; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:32:34 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pcYQ1d00E2SbwD53UcYTSb; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:32:32 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <622128.78209.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:32:23 -0800 References: <622128.78209.qm@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release 0.20.2. Below are the > error messages and java and ant versions I am using. Please tell me > what I missed. Forrest, which we use to generate the documentation, requires java 5. Therefore, run: ant -Djava5.home=/some/path/to/java5 tar There are several more you need. For a more complete list, I'd look at the how to release page: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease -- Owen From general-return-1169-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 06 03:51:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56121 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 03:51:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 03:51:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 52214 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 03:50:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51904 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 03:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51896 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 03:50:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:50:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhangyf14@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:50:48 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so2581988pwi.35 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:50:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=j5k6xDay9djzaR/gXzuU2aMVekP12Yy5l+6Qp2IVFQg=; b=D7ks5SyUFLUFmzUtJGWhr5yegTTI21uz2NSDgwLPcHfn4AohxFYeZFeQaLXwsV+ft4 t8NWDB8VgVbeQtNvNSNxh6hhBlgWPlM71tZnmvoUYmF/6OfgONs0zcQUTqJjcio0vPO3 zJsoem6tfNbRdVUSvZTIJYGD8+87E+a4G+crY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MiTcq8fYjafAbHrrl3yK8/8qW2EpwgIu5yReLs6TF+7OlqwbUKTEdLUhsT6yqKiqFa +pvlD7q9Fe+pctF6xFIlHaod9+vc1FWSJE2VT9fWOoLpIVkchlSCRidpMlG7RAQVJpIG avxynLIqcQUtnfjb2UXVFcqg74JtxebQ5yZ9E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.242.20 with SMTP id p20mr1280653wah.135.1267847427023; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:50:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:50:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: How to send KV pair to a reduce task on a particular machine? From: Yanfeng Zhang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646c9d8846f35048119bb96 --00163646c9d8846f35048119bb96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, all The KV pairs (kv1, kv2, kv3 kv4) out from mapper would be partitioned into R parts (e.g. R=2) by a partitioner. For example, kv1 and kv2 are in partition1, while kv3 and kv4 are in partition2, the reducers will get KV pairs from these two partitions, reducer1 get KV pairs from partition1 and reducer2 get KV pairs from partition2. I want to let machine1 get KV pairs from partition1 and machine2 get KV pairs from partition2. But reducer1 is not always on machine1, reducer2 is not always on machine2. Is there any way to make sure kv1 and kv2 are sent to machine1 and kv3, kv4 are sent to machine2? Thank you in advance! Sincerely, -- Yanfeng Zhang --00163646c9d8846f35048119bb96-- From general-return-1170-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 06 07:05:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58501 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 07:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 07:05:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 23769 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 07:05:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23454 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 07:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23446 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 07:05:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:05:15 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so3242094iwn.21 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:04:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=+oJnW3rCiCW89Mv6E+KjhFACR0Qi/xaKGmIGbSnIdRc=; b=X3+GcTag6svRpABDI5gBOe3wLEhsr2E+tkv2dSLGdC+hqnnwBvQRH98GdMpDLmF/uK 9t69OoKwaZkHlJQOwENRSOKqN5uBp10sjJUBMOb9eEhXsxCFzbc7LlxeJWQR27opXAGz nErcf3hMvstE38wEBDx7xY9EN9i09fwT7NuUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k2Am1wWECGa0ExFmyFQTlTe7OV9JTDqWn4/TYQBLZYnFdz6RnN7tuRHrV9mq3xl8xR 8FD/ZYV4EgCn4/cKN7mrGYVO4JulvdvonLMFsDziNJsAFYIssKHz9tQKJULas6meR0rv 9scyT64wRcRydrawMzRY2I7z1zicZHBSDjEKA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.148.83 with SMTP id o19mr652400ibv.39.1267859095277; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:04:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 02:04:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003052304i51ce9ef8r84228cb2ef1727b3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: copyFromLocal problem From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I just setup a new Hadoop cluster. When I do hadoop dfs -copyFromLocal /tmp/zero zero the file zero is being copied to the current working directory. Its not going to the DFS. Is there a way to fix this? tia From general-return-1171-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 06 07:51:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64182 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 07:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 07:51:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 41399 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 07:51:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41060 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 07:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41052 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 07:51:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:51:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:51:03 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o267oCFd037036; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:50:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic: thread-index:message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage: content-type:mime-version; b=zUJTGqltkVTWUUmxMkithRQwB0lqwhBdkTzeQ/hBPinuneUJiH8aCfu5QYZtbkdr Received: from SP1-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.135]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:50:12 -0800 From: Ravi Phulari To: iprafulla CC: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:50:11 -0800 Subject: Re: Fault Tolerancy in core hadoop and HDFS Thread-Topic: Fault Tolerancy in core hadoop and HDFS Thread-Index: Acq8mBvpMRCk4octR9m+FedhCwLVCgAaYoEc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <27798051.post@talk.nabble.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7B7493317C82rphulariyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C7B7493317C82rphulariyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HDFS Architecture talks more about fault tolerance. - http://hadoop.apache= .org/common/docs/current/hdfs_design.html Removing core-dev@ & common-dev@ from list. Please post general questions to general@ or comman-user@ . - Ravi On 3/5/10 11:13 AM, "iprafulla" wrote: Hi Everyone, I am researching fault tolerancy aspect of HDFS and hadoop core system. I went through slides at hadoop homepage and was good starting point and googled papers that were helpful. I am familiar with the hadoop system and actually looking for the detail architecture and implementation of hadoop system so that I can dig in the topic. Any suggestions are most welcome . and of course except in the code :) Thank u. prafulla -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Fault-Tolerancy-in-core= -hadoop--and-HDFS-tp27798051p27798051.html Sent from the Hadoop core-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Ravi -- --_000_C7B7493317C82rphulariyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1172-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 02:14:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62753 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 02:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 02:14:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 82072 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 02:14:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81940 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 02:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81932 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 02:14:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bbsexclusive@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:13:52 +0000 Received: by gwaa11 with SMTP id a11so2533586gwa.35 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:13:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8EbIZhWVNMWWEXTVkv3qszZwpb+eZKDDTxm/v9/jiFw=; b=OjBrHumZYDImXA7GAVtn6DIgPCAQaxljiJ2z4F9YhwOTxIPzp/HH6i331/LNpjIf1U P78lmzZWT2NJedTyxzbZl7mRTcpav0Gl5GK/WDd+3VIeS9DM1ejI6pkVH2HNyBrmm9f8 QxH9p2AyatM1qMYiiaZFEc8fLT0jMo2m/OxQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=F6QZgHYKmU/Gv90y1QUTxhMCFmDWOL+qbZUld+jpLVmQLsxAPrW5pDXkWVePKHURay hujxd0CgHCUbVCXR4DRo/aZ/GFYh7v3IPIpXLLeNPzF/qGQZcYxzkw0d5P++QzfD8oJP gwEXIZ/cBcEQUpl1UlnoSjDXWg6ottBkBGR4w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.58.5 with SMTP id l5mr4884223ank.73.1268014410767; Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:13:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6241f7fc1003070240j1b71b83qba5c21cfc0ce7842@mail.gmail.com> References: <6241f7fc1003070240j1b71b83qba5c21cfc0ce7842@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:13:30 +0800 Message-ID: <6241f7fc1003071813p612abde4qd7f2c97c44f1ab44@mail.gmail.com> Subject: I got java crash error when writing SequenceFile From: forbbs forbbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636eee35d861f2f0481409c75 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636eee35d861f2f0481409c75 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636eee35d861f220481409c73 --001636eee35d861f220481409c73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 *I just ran a simple program, and got the error below:* # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGFPE (0x8) at pc=0x00000030bda07927, pid=22891, tid=1076017504 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b07 # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 ) # Problematic frame: # C [ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x7927] # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home1/wwp/amy/SDB/hs_err_pid22891.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code. # See problematic frame for where to report the bug. # Aborted *The code is CreatePartition.java:* import java.io.IOException; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; import org.apache.hadoop.io.IntWritable; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; public class CreatePartition { public static void main(String args[]) throws IOException { Configuration conf = new Configuration(); FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); SequenceFile.Writer wr = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, conf, new Path("_sortPartitioning"), IntWritable.class, IntWritable.class); IntWritable k = new IntWritable(123); IntWritable v = new IntWritable(123); wr.append(k, v); wr.close(); } } * * * * * --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- OS:Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) uname:Linux 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Nov 7 13:56:44 EST 2007 x86_64 libc:glibc 2.3.4 NPTL 2.3.4 rlimit: STACK 10240k, CORE 0k, NPROC 73728, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity load average:0.08 0.08 0.04 CPU:total 4 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 15 model 33 stepping 2, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, mmxext, 3dnow, 3dnowext Memory: 4k page, physical 8162896k(1127340k free), swap 16386292k(16386052k free) vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13) for linux-amd64 JRE (1.6.0_18-b07), built on Dec 17 2009 13:42:22 by "java_re" with gcc 3.2.2 (SuSE Linux) * * * *Hadoop 0.19.2* * * *The error log /home1/wwp/amy/SDB/hs_err_pid22891.log is attached with this mail. * --001636eee35d861f220481409c73 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I just ran a simple p= rogram, and got the error below:

#
# A fatal error has= been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# =A0SIGFPE (0x8) a= t pc=3D0x00000030bda07927, pid=3D22891, tid=3D1076017504
#
# JRE version: 6.0_18-b07
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server= VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 )
# Problematic frame:
# C =A0[l= d-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x7927]
#
# An error report file with more inform= ation is saved as:
# /home1/wwp/amy/SDB/hs_err_pid22891.log
#
# If you would like to sub= mit a bug report, please visit:
# =A0 http://java.sun.com/webapps/bug= report/crash.jsp
# The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
# = See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
#
Aborted

<= br>The code is CreatePartition.java:<= div>
import java.io.IOException;
import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path;
imp= ort org.apache.hadoop.io.IntWritable;
import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSy= stem;
import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
import org.apache.= hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer;
import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile;

public class CreatePartiti= on
{
=A0public static void main(String args[]) throws IOException =A0{
=A0 =A0Configuration conf =3D new Configuration();
=A0 =A0Fi= leSystem fs =3D FileSystem.get(conf);
=A0 =A0SequenceFile.Writer wr =3D SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, conf, new = Path("_sortPartitioning"), IntWritable.class, IntWritable.class);=
=A0 =A0IntWritable k =3D new IntWritable(123);
=A0 =A0IntWritable = v =3D new IntWritable(123);
=A0 =A0wr.append(k, v);
=A0 =A0wr.close();
=A0}
}


--------------- =A0S Y S T E M =A0---------------
=A0
<= span style=3D"font-weight: normal;">OS:Red Hat Ente= rprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6)
=A0
uname:Linux 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Nov 7 13:56:44 EST 2007 x86_64
libc:glib= c 2.3.4 NPTL 2.3.4
rlimit: STACK 10240k, CORE 0k, NPROC 73728, NO= FILE 1024, AS infinity
load aver= age:0.08 0.08 0.04
=A0
CPU:total= 4 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 15 model 33 stepping 2, cmo= v, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, mmxext, 3dnow, 3dnowext
=A0
Memory: 4k page, physical 8162896k(1127340k free), swap 16386292k(1638= 6052k free)
=A0
vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13) for linux-amd64 = JRE (1.6.0_18-b07), built on Dec 17 2009 13:42:22 by "java_re" wi= th gcc 3.2.2 (SuSE Linux)

Hadoop 0.19.2

The error log /home1/wwp/amy/SD= B/hs_err_pid22891.log is=A0attached with this mail.=A0

--001636eee35d861f220481409c73-- --001636eee35d861f2f0481409c75-- From general-return-1173-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 06:23:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3647 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 06:23:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 06:23:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 95531 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 06:23:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95084 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 06:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95076 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 06:23:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:23:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zshao@facebook.com designates 69.63.179.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.63.179.25] (HELO mailout-sf2p.facebook.com) (69.63.179.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:22:57 +0000 Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([192.168.18.83]) by pp02.snc1.tfbnw.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o286M6VF013996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:22:06 -0800 Received: from SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.102]) by sc-hub06.TheFacebook.com ([192.168.18.83]) with mapi; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:22:36 -0800 From: Zheng Shao To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:21:44 -0800 Subject: RE: I got java crash error when writing SequenceFile Thread-Topic: I got java crash error when writing SequenceFile Thread-Index: Acq+ZQW/2oYVKYN8RjKa/28+SSzZAQAIpoqG Message-ID: References: <6241f7fc1003070240j1b71b83qba5c21cfc0ce7842@mail.gmail.com>,<6241f7fc1003071813p612abde4qd7f2c97c44f1ab44@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6241f7fc1003071813p612abde4qd7f2c97c44f1ab44@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD2E0A273BDAAD409C70BB3F48EE6A126CE9862B32SCMBXC1TheFac_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-03-08_05:2010-02-06,2010-03-08,2010-03-08 signatures=0 --_000_CD2E0A273BDAAD409C70BB3F48EE6A126CE9862B32SCMBXC1TheFac_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We had a similar problem and it turns out that hadoop native library built = on CentOS 5 cannot run reliably on Fedora Core 4. You might want to recompile the hadoop native library. Zheng ________________________________ From: forbbs forbbs [bbsexclusive@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:13 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: I got java crash error when writing SequenceFile I just ran a simple program, and got the error below: # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGFPE (0x8) at pc=3D0x00000030bda07927, pid=3D22891, tid=3D1076017504 # # JRE version: 6.0_18-b07 # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13 mixed mode linux-amd= 64 ) # Problematic frame: # C [ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x7927] # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home1/wwp/amy/SDB/hs_err_pid22891.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code. # See problematic frame for where to report the bug. # Aborted The code is CreatePartition.java: import java.io.IOException; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; import org.apache.hadoop.io.IntWritable; import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; public class CreatePartition { public static void main(String args[]) throws IOException { Configuration conf =3D new Configuration(); FileSystem fs =3D FileSystem.get(conf); SequenceFile.Writer wr =3D SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, conf, new Path(= "_sortPartitioning"), IntWritable.class, IntWritable.class); IntWritable k =3D new IntWritable(123); IntWritable v =3D new IntWritable(123); wr.append(k, v); wr.close(); } } --------------- S Y S T E M --------------- OS:Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) uname:Linux 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Nov 7 13:56:44 EST 2007 x86_64 libc:glibc 2.3.4 NPTL 2.3.4 rlimit: STACK 10240k, CORE 0k, NPROC 73728, NOFILE 1024, AS infinity load average:0.08 0.08 0.04 CPU:total 4 (2 cores per cpu, 1 threads per core) family 15 model 33 steppi= ng 2, cmov, cx8, fxsr, mmx, sse, sse2, sse3, mmxext, 3dnow, 3dnowext Memory: 4k page, physical 8162896k(1127340k free), swap 16386292k(16386052k= free) vm_info: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (16.0-b13) for linux-amd64 JRE (= 1.6.0_18-b07), built on Dec 17 2009 13:42:22 by "java_re" with gcc 3.2.2 (S= uSE Linux) Hadoop 0.19.2 The error log /home1/wwp/amy/SDB/hs_err_pid22891.log is attached with this = mail. --_000_CD2E0A273BDAAD409C70BB3F48EE6A126CE9862B32SCMBXC1TheFac_-- From general-return-1174-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 18:07:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16095 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 18:07:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 18:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 46492 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 18:07:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46421 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 18:07:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46413 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 18:07:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:07:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.169] (HELO web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:06:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 27526 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Mar 2010 18:06:32 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1268071592; bh=H/M/sKujn9gVoR2Oe6sgUmTp9o9pEW511tEFGzSj1uk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=izzwGJ0YdSGlWdJKmqW1fElNP4tIwL6iWeZpn69PeIAWtmrIHMnOPGo4U1JztmEO8TWGaFAl/68kZtxF1XARCBoRhe43uod0+qWxfhOsDyoS+4XEfpeskEAHLECaKrv1/gvRe+oiVaT7u3EF+5LviNLShUTlxyjaUcvFu3b51mE= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y5nBEWdnYvxfBhFgKSomsGoElMt3UpulLOe6sjoU6dkCA4u4GUBIuLM7D44Ak9/7CrZVQGxg2GZ42wohsjAMZ3nVCOaCZbvoQJVh6PimShp8+aQaaGzdsvdOCiqxdiXBidK/V7cpDz3UEHO2O5yPWWFDaPLBWTtpz80rDeDtSt8=; Message-ID: <673653.27493.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: f6UDwPkVM1lyZRKY8pbbH0BsYjDUWAItEZw6O2CTA.zYTKw XQS_n_66NuBR6EiitgqbN6sjLtcXmGm.HCSIy3XhphB2byLPxrKC5H5TLMiL GlDAPe0KzKOURz6asqh97V4rAz8hCeaR3G27vzwKBnZIlsxkKg.9fRzGea_N .yexbjliRqTxS4BnBAe92ehqBGz5TVLC9eoUZ8V_pdCRn7ZglmryJt0T8XU6 SAYvk2jmsuo3M3xkCsP0uc4xFyFc9mU_h1TyqYLkxZEvworPdnqmfIHt5FIK x.ym4ZDz_gtSI8u0DvEDmwBx7sJx9ZerIli2_n2uNCmUf8FUYJmAZ9qaA_Zx JbcD2ryULtXCOaipKKqnYsm2AdRALEg-- Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:06:32 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:06:32 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Owen, Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I found the build instruction. I do not understand the option, "-Djava5.home=/usr/local/jdk1.5". Does it mean I have to use JDK 1.5? I read somewhere it suggested to use JDK 1.6. Also, the very first line is "export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/32bit/jdk ". Does it mean the JAVA_HOME jdk has to be 1.5? Please let me know. export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/32bit/jdk export CFLAGS=-m32 export CXXFLAGS=-m32 ant -Dversion=X.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=true -Dcompile.c++=true -Dlibhdfs=1 -Dlibrecordio=true -Dxercescroot=/usr/local/xerces-c -Declipse.home=/usr/lib/eclipse -Dforrest.home=/usr/local/forrest -Djava5.home=/usr/local/jdk1.5 clean api-report tar test test-c++-libhdfs export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/64bit/jdk export CFLAGS=-m64 export CXXFLAGS=-m64 ant -Dversion=X.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=true -Dcompile.c++=true compile-core-native compile-c++ tar Thanks, Gary --- On Fri, 3/5/10, Owen O'Malley wrote: > From: Owen O'Malley > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 4:32 PM > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release 0.20.2. > Below are the error messages and java and ant versions I am > using. Please tell me what I missed. > > Forrest, which we use to generate the documentation, > requires java 5. Therefore, run: > > ant -Djava5.home=/some/path/to/java5 tar > > There are several more you need. For a more complete list, > I'd look at the how to release page: > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > > -- Owen > From general-return-1175-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 18:32:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29429 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 77314 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77249 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77241 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:31:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:31:52 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=rpH8xmZzta+ryKQ4yvcCyvsTY6duS9wp8c+RHv90wsOCPQI3qGeWLQLh dasKJHGcI+dZoqeBZ5WTl6oY+oIvWTAphHWKQzR8BdTpa2SlUNLCcK7h0 7JKWPjapfzubKYp; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1268073112; x=1299609112; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Compilation=20failed=20when=20compile =20hadoop=20common=20release-0.20.2|Date:=20Mon,=2008=20M ar=202010=2010:30:30=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit |In-Reply-To:=20<673653.27493.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo. com>; bh=v0uv4/IM/LKe8GWKcVKRSz42WlTPuf+j3KngmFCu8R8=; b=SYVeRTt1J4Oct4Huao9xHi1HQDuBdwP0Z1ExKzrSc0bBz/y7JpU2uyN/ vXLbpBjOfW5nQHzHtGt/Ve04+U6Je2oIu/N4LYm8HiarXpKXyAuZO2h0r n4n0cRsGDLgeqRy; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,603,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11254961" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:30:32 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:30:30 -0800 Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 Thread-Index: Acq+7W5Ei0yddHnQFky5zH/Mc9+YWg== In-Reply-To: <673653.27493.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/8/10 10:06 AM, "Gary Yang" wrote: > Hi Owen, > > Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I found the build > instruction. I do not understand the option, "-Djava5.home=/usr/local/jdk1.5". > Does it mean I have to use JDK 1.5? I read somewhere it suggested to use JDK > 1.6. JDK 1.5 is required to build the documentation. JDK1.6 is used everywhere else. So it uses the java5.home setting to kick off forrest without upsetting the JAVA_HOME env var. From general-return-1176-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 20:25:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58381 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 20:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 20:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 44053 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:25:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43998 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43990 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 20:25:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:25:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.160 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.160] (HELO e39.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:25:15 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o28KH7TY022579 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:17:07 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id o28KOogL030216 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:24:50 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o28KOovK024495 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:24:50 -0700 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o28KOoq6024490 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:24:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <673653.27493.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <673653.27493.qm@web37907.mail.mud.yahoo.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 X-KeepSent: 781492A6:58013FC4-862576E0:006FC000; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:24:49 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/08/2010 13:24:49, Serialize complete at 03/08/2010 13:24:49 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0070229C862576E0_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0070229C862576E0_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Gary This is a script I put together based on the WikiPage link Owen sent you that will build most versions of Hadoop including 0.20.2 . You are welcome to use it. Notice how I have JAVA_HOME point to java 6 and JAVA5 point to java 5 (for Forrest). In this script its pointing to IBM Java installations, but you can use a Sun/Oracle JDK if you wish to as well. The Wiki Page should be able to answer other details. #!/bin/sh export VERSION=0.20.2 set PATH=$PATH:/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60/bin/ export HADOOP_INSTALL=/home/hadoop/Hadoop-Versions/hadoop-$VERSION export FORREST_INSTALL=/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-forrest-0.8 export XERCES_INSTALL=/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/xerces-c_2_8_0 export ANT_HOME=/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-ant-1.7.1 export JAVA_HOME=/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60 export JAVA5=/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java2-i386-50 export CFLAGS=-m32 export CXXFLAGS=-m32 export PATH=$PATH:$ANT_HOME/bin cd $HADOOP_INSTALL # For some reason these scripts do not have execute permissions chmod 777 src/c++/utils/configure chmod 777 src/examples/pipes/configure chmod 777 src/native/configure # Clean, Build and Run the Core (Non-Contrib) Unit Tests ant -Dversion=$VERSION -Dcompile.native=true -Dcompile.c++=true -Dlibhdfs=1 -Dlibrecordio=true -Dxercescroot=$XERCES_INSTALL -Dforrest.home=$FORREST_INSTALL -Djava5.home=$JAVA5 clean tar test-core > /home/hadoop/Test-Scripts/Hadoop-$VERSION/ibm32build.out Kind regards Steve Watt From: Gary Yang To: general@hadoop.apache.org Date: 03/08/2010 12:07 PM Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 Hi Owen, Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I found the build instruction. I do not understand the option, "-Djava5.home=/usr/local/jdk1.5". Does it mean I have to use JDK 1.5? I read somewhere it suggested to use JDK 1.6. Also, the very first line is "export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/32bit/jdk ". Does it mean the JAVA_HOME jdk has to be 1.5? Please let me know. export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/32bit/jdk export CFLAGS=-m32 export CXXFLAGS=-m32 ant -Dversion=X.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=true -Dcompile.c++=true -Dlibhdfs=1 -Dlibrecordio=true -Dxercescroot=/usr/local/xerces-c -Declipse.home=/usr/lib/eclipse -Dforrest.home=/usr/local/forrest -Djava5.home=/usr/local/jdk1.5 clean api-report tar test test-c++-libhdfs export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/64bit/jdk export CFLAGS=-m64 export CXXFLAGS=-m64 ant -Dversion=X.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=true -Dcompile.c++=true compile-core-native compile-c++ tar Thanks, Gary --- On Fri, 3/5/10, Owen O'Malley wrote: > From: Owen O'Malley > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 4:32 PM > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release 0.20.2. > Below are the error messages and java and ant versions I am > using. Please tell me what I missed. > > Forrest, which we use to generate the documentation, > requires java 5. Therefore, run: > > ant -Djava5.home=/some/path/to/java5 tar > > There are several more you need. For a more complete list, > I'd look at the how to release page: > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > > -- Owen > --=_alternative 0070229C862576E0_=-- From general-return-1177-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 20:35:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60328 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 20:35:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 20:35:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 66574 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:34:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66529 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:34:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66521 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 20:34:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:34:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.167] (HELO web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:34:34 +0000 Received: (qmail 55572 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Mar 2010 20:34:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1268080452; bh=htHgxrJVDOEH4/dwFt+jBgjPAJwc7gF1bxsItqlguoI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TvVIyxKaA5JkhRZoddOyds6HhRhGEtgfHxuJRWBB76goyPbobeAati0Mw+CxAJKWUwTh8ATui6GLNju8b1Me87x6pciQZZ0bTDa+TZecSZS3C6u1WR8sYCpJxccKWXXoBcQWy9ESNrLaXYtqUMDd5Dq8PhE7Bg+R8D/mrI0lOTg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cg4TqUfZzDpIvN1OZAgLeCEQ7zgN/f5mrS3nwqBAUnXLYsFbk4YOAT01My1yPvLFh8A/Lp6d99X1DTzp6UUGqatjMbGWmOA/yPp3peoJDxdHu2o+Kfs5We7i6qdtLBacHE/F3b1pKDlhKli185qeSY/+c7XNSRehhyQAdzStiOc=; Message-ID: <940237.55385.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: RnRqtWUVM1k_gX14t7rbJaDWU0vY.ckqw_a9rHpkC2FKBVoWMqNqZjRypGuUXxxUOrj11YJqDFo1x18Htdoe3fsa0SpRH45b4B03W4RkJO3KD6WENlHLRoAjYx3uk_bgkripgvhjjVWHmcRwN.kjQVjFwnGbDqLSWcoFbezrcddsSBjsW1T2NHz7ssUr1LH8IAeibOlUVrY4n6_xDvMO5mw_aWIRHBHZDys7gREpFQTAzKN7kkfWhHnr_qgOIGC55qAMkdQKWLy5MnelxljptlJSh9BAy4ZGQmP21Q4oPQ8mawOli3XG8D9bWjCkVkorV1FN5.pSxP36klORAAjKPrtIZ2CQJbO3wPnPfMhbjxT3i2d8YUQPSGk- Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:34:12 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:34:12 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Allen, I did not find the java 1.5. However, I found jdk 5.01 EE edition. I think = it is java1.5. I downloaded and installed it. I got another compilation err= or. See below. Any idea? java_ee_sdk-5_01-linux.bin (the java I downloaded) /tmp/jdk1.5/jdk/bin/java -version java version "1.5.0_09" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_09-b03) ls /usr/forrest-0.8 bin/ build/ etc/ index.html KEYS lib/ LICENSE.txt main/ NOTICE.txt = plugins/ README.txt site-author/ tools/ whiteboard/ ls /tmp/eclipse about_files/ artifacts.xml dropins/ eclipse.ini features/ libcairo-s= wt.so* p2/ readme/ about.html configuration/ eclipse* epl-v10.html icon.xpm notice.htm= l plugins/ My build scripts: #!/bin/sh export JAVA_HOME=3D/tmp/jdk1.5/jdk export CFLAGS=3D-m32 export CXXFLAGS=3D-m32 ant -Dversion=3D0.20.2 -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue -Dlibhd= fs=3D1 -Dlibrecordio=3Dtrue -Dxercescroot=3D/usr/xercesc -Declipse.home=3D/= tmp/eclipse -Dforrest.home=3D/usr/forrest-0.8 -Djava5.home=3D/tmp/jdk1.5/jd= k clean api-report tar test test-c++-libhdfs Error Messages: [touch] Creating /tmp/null568498220 [delete] Deleting: /tmp/null568498220 [copy] Copying 7 files to /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/webapps record-parser: compile-rcc-compiler: [javac] Compiling 29 source files to /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/cl= asses [javac] javac: invalid target release: 1.6 [javac] Usage: javac [javac] where possible options include: [javac] -g Generate all debugging info [javac] -g:none Generate no debugging info [javac] -g:{lines,vars,source} Generate only some debugging info [javac] -nowarn Generate no warnings [javac] -verbose Output messages about what the com= piler is doing [javac] -deprecation Output source locations where depr= ecated APIs are used [javac] -classpath Specify where to find user class f= iles [javac] -cp Specify where to find user class f= iles [javac] -sourcepath Specify where to find input source= files [javac] -bootclasspath Override location of bootstrap cla= ss files [javac] -extdirs Override location of installed ext= ensions [javac] -endorseddirs Override location of endorsed stan= dards path [javac] -d Specify where to place generated c= lass files [javac] -encoding Specify character encoding used by= source files [javac] -source Provide source compatibility with = specified release [javac] -target Generate class files for specific = VM version [javac] -version Version information [javac] -help Print a synopsis of standard optio= ns [javac] -X Print a synopsis of nonstandard op= tions [javac] -J Pass directly to the runtim= e system [javac]=20 BUILD FAILED /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build.xml:316: Compile failed; see the compiler e= rror output for details. I deleted my java 1.6. I do not understand why I got the error below. [javac] javac: invalid target release: 1.6 [javac] Usage: javac Thanks, Gary --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > From: Allen Wittenauer > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 10:30 AM >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 3/8/10 10:06 AM, "Gary Yang" > wrote: >=20 > > Hi Owen, > >=20 > > Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I > found the build > > instruction. I do not understand the option, > "-Djava5.home=3D/usr/local/jdk1.5". > > Does it mean I have to use JDK 1.5? I read somewhere > it suggested to use JDK > > 1.6.=20 >=20 > JDK 1.5 is required to build the documentation.=A0 > JDK1.6 is used everywhere > else. So it uses the java5.home setting to kick off forrest > without > upsetting the JAVA_HOME env var. >=20 >=20 > =0A=0A=0A From general-return-1178-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 20:38:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61393 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 20:38:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 20:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 70540 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:37:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70491 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 20:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70483 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 20:37:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:37:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.163] (HELO web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:37:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 49392 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Mar 2010 20:37:32 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1268080651; bh=/SAOrRcNxEwRmnv7cQt6SWYQEn8er711Lj7KzlMwW2w=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=d28OBB3xgcnCz+7dlnRngC5lOxz7E1a5Mb6GN5WzmOa1ZQvhqyNFHOcoiaUVDUN307w9ixx2r3CFE602wcZY2Iqi7z4Xx3oq/IujPcS9GTttEH+1QngaXsxF89UK4n7TTbEQqYpIsCjg/eLKU138YqDNIaRPYJVvkFEeT7Oif4c= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LZK/e75P7SYy6+CJuj22AfzD3gRQqEOBWuEYuZCs/aQNq583tWdcpJlYUTPRUcb7Ky5GHRjTYypaK6cYCL0Leb+NmQVlhVoZ0H2uKzFsdYUbVF5Oa18r+MwzU/o5oqxr8jQ4rvAWecJF6LV7MgTMkjPm9apescr5wEp+eANUZ/c=; Message-ID: <940415.39128.qm@web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9jBqQ1IVM1n8f4M6BCe.t2SJJkmpDHYhUUDWrBa74RyZEsV LryzdxLeubWjYJepDu4Dp_L7ykIYrDUbUTRQe9cWKbrxXPYZy6GANlYwZXm5 YVfR8z936xI7VpV3hlETqZMDpR6ciVTH3MlwbETKaFJNMifqo1wNq23_lADI Kyf5P9NQEW4XI1Rc3g9NekSR86DZfW_ny7TFkjLULpnWGsjTlHqTb3Jl1jgK 09Wf2PBk.16rhumNepAdwImPIm1gyEYFkmsnjU.GW5RlqQHOyd.A7bsBOY8w YK1D1S8rxjdUeiA8514JARKePRj0kHcmv.p2zUeZ0Q48qRLRcUKm_RgWNATR B Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37901.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:37:31 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:37:31 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, Thank you very much for this email. I sent an email and reported an compila= tion error before I got your email. I am going to try your script and let y= ou know. Thank you again, Gary --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Stephen Watt wrote: > From: Stephen Watt > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 12:24 PM > Hi Gary >=20 > This is a script I put together based on the WikiPage link > Owen sent you=20 > that will build most versions of Hadoop including 0.20.2 > .=A0 You are=20 > welcome to use it. Notice how I have JAVA_HOME point to > java 6 and JAVA5=20 > point to java 5 (for Forrest). In this script its pointing > to IBM Java=20 > installations, but you can use a Sun/Oracle JDK if you wish > to as well.=20 > The Wiki Page should be able to answer other details. >=20 > #!/bin/sh > export VERSION=3D0.20.2 > set > PATH=3D$PATH:/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60/bin/ > export > HADOOP_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Hadoop-Versions/hadoop-$VERSION > export > FORREST_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-forrest-0.8 > export > XERCES_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/xerces-c_2_8_0 > export > ANT_HOME=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-ant-1.7.1 > export > JAVA_HOME=3D/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60 > export JAVA5=3D/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java2-i386-50 > export CFLAGS=3D-m32 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m32 > export PATH=3D$PATH:$ANT_HOME/bin >=20 > cd $HADOOP_INSTALL >=20 > # For some reason these scripts do not have execute > permissions > chmod 777 src/c++/utils/configure > chmod 777 src/examples/pipes/configure > chmod 777 src/native/configure >=20 > # Clean, Build and Run the Core (Non-Contrib) Unit Tests > ant -Dversion=3D$VERSION -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue=20 > -Dlibhdfs=3D1 -Dlibrecordio=3Dtrue > -Dxercescroot=3D$XERCES_INSTALL=20 > -Dforrest.home=3D$FORREST_INSTALL -Djava5.home=3D$JAVA5 clean > tar test-core >=20 > /home/hadoop/Test-Scripts/Hadoop-$VERSION/ibm32build.out >=20 > Kind regards > Steve Watt >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: > Gary Yang > To: > general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: > 03/08/2010 12:07 PM > Subject: > Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common > release-0.20.2 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Owen, >=20 > Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I found > the build=20 > instruction. I do not understand the option,=20 > "-Djava5.home=3D/usr/local/jdk1.5". Does it mean I have to > use JDK 1.5? I=20 > read somewhere it suggested to use JDK 1.6.=20 >=20 > Also, the very first line is "export > JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/32bit/jdk > ". Does it mean the JAVA_HOME jdk has to be 1.5?=A0 > Please let me know. >=20 >=20 > export JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/32bit/jdk > export CFLAGS=3D-m32 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m32 > ant -Dversion=3DX.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue -Dlibhdfs=3D1=20 > -Dlibrecordio=3Dtrue -Dxercescroot=3D/usr/local/xerces-c=20 > -Declipse.home=3D/usr/lib/eclipse > -Dforrest.home=3D/usr/local/forrest=20 > -Djava5.home=3D/usr/local/jdk1.5 clean api-report tar test > test-c++-libhdfs > export JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/64bit/jdk > export CFLAGS=3D-m64 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m64 > ant -Dversion=3DX.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue=20 > compile-core-native compile-c++ tar >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Gary >=20 >=20 >=20 > --- On Fri, 3/5/10, Owen O'Malley > wrote: >=20 > > From: Owen O'Malley > > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop > common=20 > release-0.20.2 > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 4:32 PM > >=20 > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release > 0.20.2. > > Below are the error messages and java and ant versions > I am > > using. Please tell me what I missed. > >=20 > > Forrest, which we use to generate the documentation, > > requires java 5. Therefore, run: > >=20 > > ant -Djava5.home=3D/some/path/to/java5 tar > >=20 > > There are several more you need. For a more complete > list, > > I'd look at the how to release page: > >=20 > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > >=20 > > -- Owen > >=20 >=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > =0A=0A=0A From general-return-1179-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 08 22:21:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88590 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 22:21:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 22:21:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 31143 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 22:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31108 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 22:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31096 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 22:21:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:21:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.164] (HELO web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:20:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 24463 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Mar 2010 22:20:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1268086836; bh=rCEsivLLrofsCz6G38BwFKzpjmmN4sGM51tAAp2z+eM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qWgxzWHCSVIfyxJSGLASmMUwP5Uwk8GKK5HWKiR1uRO5V4LuQFlnCLMqa0TUBX/UlAC4GlwrgTJQN0f8K07u9n6/8HkeJTuHyIiJ8IQ/od5+Kv7V/m0nGRe9QcMPNRmFPXTtjvNKhhmjp6/64sHBkAM5Le3qCFnqiQyoUC5W5Gs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aTNh35B167Ejq6Vat0seTj4ooQX8TVGAI89ibxi41vgtWYD05eMS8lrQldiYxHqJHWV+eBLV1PiK2as/IMBy1kdkQkEDTvXkfEEw3YU1UkDQ4U7ruL/pQaGYzhJPMR3D7GFzKBhZa3uzNJsXHJH9kG8n1+pptTUhQfYbGHBNLXc=; Message-ID: <813950.21244.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: sy5EyuYVM1kCR_ocL4PUlGmZNYl5u4wrRVw8kxyGtxhH98ynXZPfkYZm7r9G4MdderPBxraE8k3Sf6tJvhbRvCl4Mz2a5XA4vQhdiZ1mfJhVpTNi8b5Rj6mjYbEhZC8euZEjkVLlli8hcKt9WnHCpop7eWZqNqdnXxHIZOc5fWAw3GfR8r4bGOv5wGx_c5DPGq6BEETYoRDLJ97zeS876c1QzW6SE.rda7K9eZ8jn9oeJ9bykb42r9x3BuTDlISK.2KNdrP_BX9lT_yvJXSyRKdwMvk6q0YewH0MAGyooHE8BwxjtdjQKxsSyHJXOqGFr.Hr0zaW8vm4fPS5pUO9oALk8Dgs Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:20:36 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.2.12 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:20:36 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Yang Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, I used your script. However, I got errors related to xerces-c-3.1.0. Below is how I compiled and installed xerces. ./configure --prefix=3D/path/tools/xerces-c-3.1.0 make make install Below are errors related to xerces-c-3.1.0. Do you have any idea? jar-test: [jar] Building jar: /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/hadoop-0.20.2-tes= t.jar ant-tasks: [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/ant/org/apach= e/hadoop/ant [jar] Building jar: /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/hadoop-0.20.2-ant= .jar compile-librecordio: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/librecordio [exec] g++ -g3 -O0 -Wall -c -I/path/tools/xerces-c-3.1.0/include -o /t= mp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/librecordio/recordio.o recordio.cc [exec] In file included from recordio.cc:22: [exec] xmlarchive.hh:77: error: conflicting return type specified for = `virtual unsigned int hadoop::MyBinInputStream::curPos() const' [exec] /path/tools/xerces-c-3.1.0/include/xercesc/util/BinInputStream.= hpp:41: error: overriding `virtual XMLFilePos xercesc_3_1::BinInputStream= ::curPos() const' [exec] xmlarchive.hh: In member function `virtual xercesc_3_1::BinInpu= tStream* hadoop::MyInputSource::makeStream() const': [exec] xmlarchive.hh:97: error: cannot allocate an object of type `had= oop::MyBinInputStream' [exec] xmlarchive.hh:97: error: because the following virtual functi= ons are abstract: [exec] /path/tools/xerces-c-3.1.0/include/xercesc/util/BinInputStream.= hpp:67: error: virtual const XMLCh* xercesc_3_1::BinInputStream::getConten= tType() const [exec] make: *** [/tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build/librecordio/recordio= .o] Error 1 BUILD FAILED /tmp/hadoop-common-0.20.2/build.xml:1316: exec returned: 2 Thanks, Gary --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Stephen Watt wrote: > From: Stephen Watt > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common release-0.20.2 > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 12:24 PM > Hi Gary >=20 > This is a script I put together based on the WikiPage link > Owen sent you=20 > that will build most versions of Hadoop including 0.20.2 > .=A0 You are=20 > welcome to use it. Notice how I have JAVA_HOME point to > java 6 and JAVA5=20 > point to java 5 (for Forrest). In this script its pointing > to IBM Java=20 > installations, but you can use a Sun/Oracle JDK if you wish > to as well.=20 > The Wiki Page should be able to answer other details. >=20 > #!/bin/sh > export VERSION=3D0.20.2 > set > PATH=3D$PATH:/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60/bin/ > export > HADOOP_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Hadoop-Versions/hadoop-$VERSION > export > FORREST_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-forrest-0.8 > export > XERCES_INSTALL=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/xerces-c_2_8_0 > export > ANT_HOME=3D/home/hadoop/Test-Dependencies/apache-ant-1.7.1 > export > JAVA_HOME=3D/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java-i386-60 > export JAVA5=3D/home/hadoop/Java-Versions/ibm-java2-i386-50 > export CFLAGS=3D-m32 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m32 > export PATH=3D$PATH:$ANT_HOME/bin >=20 > cd $HADOOP_INSTALL >=20 > # For some reason these scripts do not have execute > permissions > chmod 777 src/c++/utils/configure > chmod 777 src/examples/pipes/configure > chmod 777 src/native/configure >=20 > # Clean, Build and Run the Core (Non-Contrib) Unit Tests > ant -Dversion=3D$VERSION -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue=20 > -Dlibhdfs=3D1 -Dlibrecordio=3Dtrue > -Dxercescroot=3D$XERCES_INSTALL=20 > -Dforrest.home=3D$FORREST_INSTALL -Djava5.home=3D$JAVA5 clean > tar test-core >=20 > /home/hadoop/Test-Scripts/Hadoop-$VERSION/ibm32build.out >=20 > Kind regards > Steve Watt >=20 >=20 >=20 > From: > Gary Yang > To: > general@hadoop.apache.org > Date: > 03/08/2010 12:07 PM > Subject: > Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop common > release-0.20.2 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Owen, >=20 > Thanks for the reply. From the link you provided, I found > the build=20 > instruction. I do not understand the option,=20 > "-Djava5.home=3D/usr/local/jdk1.5". Does it mean I have to > use JDK 1.5? I=20 > read somewhere it suggested to use JDK 1.6.=20 >=20 > Also, the very first line is "export > JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/32bit/jdk > ". Does it mean the JAVA_HOME jdk has to be 1.5?=A0 > Please let me know. >=20 >=20 > export JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/32bit/jdk > export CFLAGS=3D-m32 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m32 > ant -Dversion=3DX.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue -Dlibhdfs=3D1=20 > -Dlibrecordio=3Dtrue -Dxercescroot=3D/usr/local/xerces-c=20 > -Declipse.home=3D/usr/lib/eclipse > -Dforrest.home=3D/usr/local/forrest=20 > -Djava5.home=3D/usr/local/jdk1.5 clean api-report tar test > test-c++-libhdfs > export JAVA_HOME=3D/path/to/64bit/jdk > export CFLAGS=3D-m64 > export CXXFLAGS=3D-m64 > ant -Dversion=3DX.Y.Z -Dcompile.native=3Dtrue > -Dcompile.c++=3Dtrue=20 > compile-core-native compile-c++ tar >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Gary >=20 >=20 >=20 > --- On Fri, 3/5/10, Owen O'Malley > wrote: >=20 > > From: Owen O'Malley > > Subject: Re: Compilation failed when compile hadoop > common=20 > release-0.20.2 > > To: general@hadoop.apache.org > > Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 4:32 PM > >=20 > > On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Gary Yang wrote: > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > I try to compile hadoop common of the release > 0.20.2. > > Below are the error messages and java and ant versions > I am > > using. Please tell me what I missed. > >=20 > > Forrest, which we use to generate the documentation, > > requires java 5. Therefore, run: > >=20 > > ant -Djava5.home=3D/some/path/to/java5 tar > >=20 > > There are several more you need. For a more complete > list, > > I'd look at the how to release page: > >=20 > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > >=20 > > -- Owen > >=20 >=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > =0A=0A=0A From general-return-1180-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 09 04:20:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83517 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 04:20:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 04:20:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 4451 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 04:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4168 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 04:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4160 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 04:20:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zookog@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.197] (HELO mail-iw0-f197.google.com) (209.85.223.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:20:17 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so1647605iwn.2 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:19:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NUpKd86HcC+IV9m7q9qNVrr4sf9tWWYXSrPp0i3Koeg=; b=cI9o8k0ytuslni8FpiScAbLg9UXj9miIvv2EZwcx6wJgDPSsLWkmt0+XzBS7WO7V9g KuoQJ9rEigzDMTPVqzwL9Dvg9j0Gemmmz+dEte6sas13su5areLNpNLrbOdl3R47OWzo L30v+gUX2EWJeg7uOlEK5oqaYoi7V4/04EZzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=atQrTN8S3BaQQH8uPPFF0tzJj/KnyiCmSfKPiZKTZeIOdFrE2KSJlDQL0uWQuR3UrF FykojmwW2HOhoEOO/8AdqEGi64C4xTfrDq4lW4TxF/jA8D4PbCq7tq0pZsULBHXzHOjx S5snPmFq1cmVIcaru/gXm/Rw42P5KbH0OMIi4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.79.193 with SMTP id q1mr71177ibk.59.1268108396045; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:19:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <27798051.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:19:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fault Tolerancy in core hadoop and HDFS From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You might also be interested in hadoop-lafs (http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-lafs ) which lets Hadoop use Tahoe-LAFS (http://tahoe-lafs.org ) instead of HDFS. Tahoe-LAFS is a fault-tolerant distributed data store which uses erasure coding (c.f. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-503 ) and SHA-256-based integrity checks. Regards, Zooko From general-return-1181-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 09 19:23:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72547 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 19:23:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 19:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 7292 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 19:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7234 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 19:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7226 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 19:22:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:22:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:22:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 72424 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 19:22:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.110]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:22:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4B969FF3.7070607@apache.org> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:22:27 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released References: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris, do you intend to publish the jars to the Maven repository, or should someone else volunteer to do this? It would be best if the Hadoop project did this officially in org.apache.hadoop, otherwise someone else will publish these jars elsewhere, which creates confusion. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6617 Instructions for doing this have not yet been added to http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease, but in Avro I've just used scp to publish jars to Maven. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Avro/HowToRelease Cheers, Doug Chris Douglas wrote: > Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of > changes may be found in the release notes: > > http://bit.ly/dd6rwL > > And in JIRA: > > COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f > MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 > HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO > > Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C From general-return-1182-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 09 20:19:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87687 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 20:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 20:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 85687 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 20:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85652 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 20:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85644 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 20:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:19:24 +0000 Received: from wlanvpn-mc2e-246-12.corp.yahoo.com (wlanvpn-mc2e-246-12.corp.yahoo.com [172.21.148.12]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o29KIIFZ087307 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:18:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=s7NgM5N1lMHE2HpoyOWbwVRrCkvvoDdLcwZI5X07ew4zjMgi+e1OCXWxurzJXMjP Message-Id: <52E5C1DD-8859-4F92-8886-DD4725FD475B@yahoo-inc.com> From: Lee Tucker To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <4B969FF3.7070607@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:18:18 -0800 References: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> <4B969FF3.7070607@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) HADOOP-6382 exists to back port enough of the maven-in-ant infrastructure into HADOOP 20 to allow these jars to be published. Lee Tucker ltucker@yahoo-inc.com On Mar 9, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Chris, do you intend to publish the jars to the Maven repository, or > should someone else volunteer to do this? It would be best if the > Hadoop project did this officially in org.apache.hadoop, otherwise > someone else will publish these jars elsewhere, which creates > confusion. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6617 > > Instructions for doing this have not yet been added to > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease, but in Avro I've just used > scp to publish jars to Maven. > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Avro/HowToRelease > > Cheers, > > Doug > > Chris Douglas wrote: >> Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of >> changes may be found in the release notes: >> >> http://bit.ly/dd6rwL >> >> And in JIRA: >> >> COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f >> MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 >> HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO >> >> Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C From general-return-1183-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 09 21:01:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99818 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 21:01:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 21:01:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 69116 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 21:01:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69060 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 21:01:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69051 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 21:01:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:01:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:01:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 99761 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 21:01:15 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:01:15 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so1332877bwz.29 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:00:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.144.153 with SMTP id z25mr376571bku.198.1268168445451; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:00:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52E5C1DD-8859-4F92-8886-DD4725FD475B@yahoo-inc.com> References: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> <4B969FF3.7070607@apache.org> <52E5C1DD-8859-4F92-8886-DD4725FD475B@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:00:45 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1003091300l33c73746r38a2eeeebdf2e694@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lee is right. I'll work with Lee and Giri to publish 0.20.2, but someone more familiar with maven should work on getting HADOOP-6382 into 0.20.3. -C On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Lee Tucker wrote: > HADOOP-6382 exists to back port enough of the maven-in-ant infrastructure > into HADOOP 20 to allow these jars to be published. > > Lee Tucker > ltucker@yahoo-inc.com > > > > On Mar 9, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > >> Chris, do you intend to publish the jars to the Maven repository, or >> should someone else volunteer to do this? =A0It would be best if the >> Hadoop project did this officially in org.apache.hadoop, otherwise >> someone else will publish these jars elsewhere, which creates confusion. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6617 >> >> Instructions for doing this have not yet been added to >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease, but in Avro I've just used >> scp to publish jars to Maven. >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Avro/HowToRelease >> >> Cheers, >> >> Doug >> >> Chris Douglas wrote: >>> >>> Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of >>> changes may be found in the release notes: >>> >>> http://bit.ly/dd6rwL >>> >>> And in JIRA: >>> >>> COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f >>> MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 >>> HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO >>> >>> Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C > > From general-return-1184-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 10 04:46:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15910 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2010 04:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2010 04:45:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 51368 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 04:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51036 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 04:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51028 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2010 04:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:45:23 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so3472853wyb.35 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:45:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Ac4GJrRcSQxkG2FSRNv4G/sszubVrCgREhP7hXoVyLw=; b=YEZQ3ZwMuseQH29hmzOLAZ3tIZuI2bfPoNCLiNGt1H0+KymgLkKwJGe8OxwWx2c0Pe eXvGncB1A3i3gisKiOFUMySUMOrn2TCW9YfWnh+m3ICxRoAl5/RrOg4UiaGP2hS+2IBf 2X8a926M1I0EmZP2EfBOZMpElgEdkfH6QRiEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=C7wkPSrzROwxnJ7nn900RFveivo2BX3ysdOocH/lQ+dpejbxj+tjkFJkMiioMrmR0a k4X07sYRNHJtjRyWhmXH1swRQsAJK+plq9bScsSOB23wWqrt05mnBs17VHTeSP2VLdJk RX3WuoxULafoF1eD6ourrbLcyWzBbZHJbA9oA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.9 with SMTP id t9mr146028wee.79.1268196302484; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:45:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:45:02 -0500 Message-ID: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Native libraries on Mac From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I run make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in the build output before it quits. Any help on building the native libs by either method would be greatly appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little issue... unless it's something simple). Christopher From general-return-1185-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 10 23:44:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61353 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2010 23:44:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2010 23:44:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3638 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 23:43:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3611 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2010 23:43:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3603 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2010 23:43:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:43:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:43:31 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so435700wyi.35 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=u2b6ee7z6D1eVDDXf5OnUetCiF1wfoZVYHhaEw2Qc1I=; b=kjfWdMuphvBW29kybr+miyME71qX13CaxuaLJM6KifAIGxtFSwYsWtqW3/o36MDj6O Q+Ju9pWi0aP85kltQlnHvNJB6QCN2xRdROENg6oZ/WNVmFQKF8GbIRKBdRpKCT6gkJAA E//Xbdj55hLEhCUW3y34lqAgD7gv9g1O5lvds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=sloj3AnFZ5H4K3Y9Z0dSNHbSNJlGqtr6DTnnhVlHVPcRUBFcOUBhJOGymQGIoU8EQg F3jZpAQiTrs2SysDX0BHBkAkc5rNRwqgSscG1JdJ3x2fpLA0QYwzqXzab8bXPQgvY1hN 8B+t6+qrRkJLCYJOpuGxDWZA6+zdMo3yFyHV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.67 with SMTP id v45mr1238516wee.70.1268264590431; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:43:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:43:10 -0500 Message-ID: <9db00c201003101543y45dcce4fh6076f4838d6250fb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A follow up: I've successfully figured out how to point ivy to my maven repository by editing the ivy/ivysettings.xml file, and have successfully built the binaries. However, now I can't figure out how to load the libraries. I try to run a simple java program that calls 'System.loadLibrary("hadoop");' from the command line with the library path set: java -Djava.library.path=$HADOOP_HOME/lib/native/Mac_OS_X-x86_64-64 TestClass But I get a stack trace saying it can't find the library! Perhaps this is related to a bug reported on the common-user mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/common-user@hadoop.apache.org/msg04768.html If anybody has any ideas or a patch to fix the 64 bit build on Mac or whatever, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks, Christopher On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: > I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X > Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 > > I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to > the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the > dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was > able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local > one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, > and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. > > Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in > HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things > working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I run > make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in > the build output before it quits. > > Any help on building the native libs by either method would be greatly > appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too > complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little issue... > unless it's something simple). > > Christopher > From general-return-1186-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 02:13:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1614 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 02:13:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 02:13:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 14391 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 02:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14349 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 02:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14341 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 02:12:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:12:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:12:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 1436 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cdouglas, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:12:55 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2662977bwz.29 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.35.11 with SMTP id n11mr1302909bkd.4.1268273541519; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8f8e14c41003020418s1753b966x9279bc1d457b53b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267dd3b1003011331x13ee1070gf081ce0c58f549e8@mail.gmail.com> <8f8e14c41003020418s1753b966x9279bc1d457b53b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1267dd3b1003101812s60ded730h5e6627e217281a3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop 0.20.2 is released From: Chris Douglas To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop 0.20.2 has been pushed to repository.apache.org and members of the Mahout community report that it is working. ***NOTE*** Users of the repository should be aware that the naming convention enforced by Maven requires that the .jar names *differ* from those produced by the 0.20.2 build. For example, instead of hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar, one receives hadoop-core-0.20.2.jar from the repo. The Maven naming convention will be used for all artifacts in 0.20.3 and later. To avoid confusion in downstream projects, I would like to roll a 0.20.3 very soon, in the next few weeks if possible. HADOOP-6382 will be applied to 0.20.3 presently. Direct all thanks to Giri for his excellent work on this issue. -C On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Drew Farris wrote: > Congratulations, and thanks for the 0.20.2 release. > > I can see the release on the mirrors, but can someone also push it to > the repo at repository.apache.org? > > Thanks, > Drew > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: >> Hadoop 0.20.2 is released and propagating to mirrors. The list of >> changes may be found in the release notes: >> >> http://bit.ly/dd6rwL >> >> And in JIRA: >> >> COMMON: http://bit.ly/9fDo2f >> MAPREDUCE: http://bit.ly/aD0BM5 >> HDFS: http://bit.ly/ckvMfO >> >> Thanks to everyone who worked on this release. -C >> > From general-return-1187-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 14:10:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7050 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 14:10:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 14:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 98207 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 14:09:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98152 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 14:09:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98141 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 14:09:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:09:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:09:46 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:09:23 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:09:22 +0100 Subject: Compile error Thread-Topic: Compile error Thread-Index: AcrBJHKgmIJXALbBSKqwImz/5TiqAg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018C_01CAC12C.D46C7580" MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_018C_01CAC12C.D46C7580 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_018D_01CAC12C.D46C7580" ------=_NextPart_001_018D_01CAC12C.D46C7580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi list, I remember seeing a mail about this already, but I can't find it back in the archives - maybe I remembered wrong. When I try to compile hadoop-core 0.20.2 I'm getting a SocketException while ant is trying to download Ivy (see below). Apparently it thinks there's no connection, but a ping and wget proves otherwise. What am I / is it doing wrong here? Best regards, Evert Lammerts Buildfile: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml ivy-download: [get] Getting: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar [get] To: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar [get] Error getting http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar to /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar BUILD FAILED /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:1630: java.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:525) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:475) at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:163) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:394) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:529) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.(HttpClient.java:233) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:306) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:323) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConnecti on.java:860) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnection.j ava:801) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.java:7 26) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:661) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:581) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:571) Evert Lammerts Adviseur SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization eScience Support Group Phone: +31 20 888 4101 Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl ------=_NextPart_001_018D_01CAC12C.D46C7580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi list,

 

I remember seeing a mail about this already, but I = can’t find it back in the archives – maybe I remembered = wrong.

 

When I try to compile hadoop-core 0.20.2 I’m = getting a SocketException while ant is trying to download Ivy (see below). = Apparently it thinks there’s no connection, but a ping and wget proves = otherwise. What am I / is it doing wrong here?

 

Best regards,

Evert Lammerts

 

Buildfile: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml

 

ivy-download:

      [get] Getting: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.= jar

      [get] To: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar

      [get] Error getting http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.= jar to /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar

 

BUILD FAILED

/home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:16= 30: java.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable

        at = java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333)

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195)<= /o:p>

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182)

=

        at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366)

=

        at = java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:525)

        at = java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:475)

        at = sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:163)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:394)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:529)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.<init>(HttpClient.java:233)<= /p>

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:306)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:323)

        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConne= ction.java:860)

        at = sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnectio= n.java:801)

        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.jav= a:726)

        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:661)<= o:p>

        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:581)<= /p>

        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:571)<= /p>

 

Evert Lammerts

Adviseur

SARA Computing & Network Services

High Performance Computing & Visualization

eScience Support Group

 

Phone: +31 20 888 4101

Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl

 

------=_NextPart_001_018D_01CAC12C.D46C7580-- ------=_NextPart_000_018C_01CAC12C.D46C7580 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDMxMTE0MDkyMlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFHLfpp/3 wn8XtdNvaJmircMEgFqrMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAsHB8zVgFVT5qvfntuK+uosjsbFtzcNr+hfyQR9ywxy9NoAqCXPfCiI/aDPXOHBKFMED9SrYB woZEC03je/YyG8Mx6+LmXakBXnXoCALlhr0c4DKBv74yeF9s0sszUAnxIj1QCGaMujp25Rn5viMr 5Jee6GehjZMCsFSgHAlY4OGozWFYANsndrq9TPrnQkqXos4MNeBExXOT8pZKE2DGe+nFPw5QbeYo 7FROUMO/gPJNUWGK9uhKQlZBoVGesLQZlfIygULd6BO6/j0v5nFwOeFMsjIRjsZZhVVJT7DNQwXC e1GeDuXYmVs5P852+KGif2xuINYPOTZAgIllNlmXqAAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_018C_01CAC12C.D46C7580-- From general-return-1188-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 16:25:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60590 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 16:25:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 16:25:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 70212 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 16:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70158 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 16:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70150 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 16:24:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:24:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [145.100.8.32] (HELO planck.ka.sara.nl) (145.100.8.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:24:46 +0000 Received: from planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) by planck.ka.sara.nl ([145.100.8.32]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:24:25 +0100 From: Evert Lammerts To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:24:25 +0100 Subject: RE: Compile error Thread-Topic: Compile error Thread-Index: AcrBJHKgmIJXALbBSKqwImz/5TiqAgAEpxeA Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01E4_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_01E4_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_01E5_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0" ------=_NextPart_001_01E5_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi again, my problem is solved. Setting bindv6only to 0 in /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf on my debian squeeze installation seems to have fixed the problem. Sorry for littering the list. Evert Lammerts From: Evert Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl] Sent: donderdag 11 maart 2010 15:09 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Compile error Hi list, I remember seeing a mail about this already, but I can't find it back in the archives - maybe I remembered wrong. When I try to compile hadoop-core 0.20.2 I'm getting a SocketException while ant is trying to download Ivy (see below). Apparently it thinks there's no connection, but a ping and wget proves otherwise. What am I / is it doing wrong here? Best regards, Evert Lammerts Buildfile: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml ivy-download: [get] Getting: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar [get] To: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar [get] Error getting http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar to /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar BUILD FAILED /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:1630: java.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:525) at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:475) at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:163) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:394) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:529) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.(HttpClient.java:233) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:306) at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:323) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConnecti on.java:860) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnection.j ava:801) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.java:7 26) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:661) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:581) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:571) Evert Lammerts Adviseur SARA Computing & Network Services High Performance Computing & Visualization eScience Support Group Phone: +31 20 888 4101 Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl ------=_NextPart_001_01E5_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi again, my problem = is solved. Setting bindv6only to 0 in /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf on my debian squeeze installation seems to have fixed the problem. Sorry for littering the = list.

 

Evert = Lammerts

 

From:= Evert = Lammerts [mailto:Evert.Lammerts@sara.nl]
Sent: donderdag 11 maart 2010 15:09
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Compile error

 

Hi list,

 

I remember seeing a mail about this already, but I = can’t find it back in the archives – maybe I remembered = wrong.

 

When I try to compile hadoop-core 0.20.2 I’m = getting a SocketException while ant is trying to download Ivy (see below). = Apparently it thinks there’s no connection, but a ping and wget proves = otherwise. What am I / is it doing wrong here?

 

Best regards,

Evert Lammerts

 

Buildfile: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml

 

ivy-download:

      [get] Getting: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.= jar

      [get] To: /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar

      [get] Error getting http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.= jar to /home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/ivy/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar

 

BUILD FAILED

/home/hadoop/opt/code/hadoop/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:16= 30: java.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333)

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195)<= /o:p>

        at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182)

=

        at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:366)

=

        at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:525)

        at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:475)

        at sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:163)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:394)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:529)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.<init>(HttpClient.java:233)<= /p>

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:306)

        at sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.New(HttpClient.java:323)

        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(HttpURLConne= ction.java:860)

        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnectio= n.java:801)

        at = sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.connect(HttpURLConnection.jav= a:726)

        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.openConnection(Get.java:661)<= o:p>

        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.get(Get.java:581)<= /p>

        at = org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Get$GetThread.run(Get.java:571)<= /p>

 

Evert Lammerts

Adviseur

SARA Computing & Network Services

High Performance Computing & Visualization

eScience Support Group

 

Phone: +31 20 888 4101

Email: evert.lammerts@sara.nl

 

------=_NextPart_001_01E5_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0-- ------=_NextPart_000_01E4_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPUDCCBDIw ggMaoAMCAQICAQEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwezELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgMEkdyZWF0 ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBwwHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UECgwRQ29tb2RvIENBIExpbWl0 ZWQxITAfBgNVBAMMGEFBQSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczAeFw0wNDAxMDEwMDAwMDBaFw0y ODEyMzEyMzU5NTlaMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIx EDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9kbyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhB QUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC+ QJ30buHqdoccTUVEjr5GyIMGncEq/hgfjuQC+vOrXVCKFjELmgbQxXAizUktVGPMtm5oRgtT6stM JMC8ck7q8RWu9FSaEgrDerIzYOLaiVXzIljz3tzP74OGooyUT59o8piQRoQnx3a/48w1LIteB2Rl gsBIsKiR+WGfdiBQqJHHZrXreGIDVvCKGhPqMaMeoJn9OPb2JzJYbwf1a7j7FCuvt6rM1mNfc4za BZmoOKjLF3g2UazpnvR4Oo3PD9lC4pgMqy+fDgHe75+ZSfEt36x0TRuYtUfF5SnR+ZAYx2KcvoPH Jns+iiXHwN2d5jVoECCdj9je0sOEnA1e6C/JAgMBAAGjgcAwgb0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFKARCiM+lvEH 7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MHsGA1UdHwR0MHIw OKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3Js MDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmww DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAAhW/ALwm+j/pPrWe8ZEgM5PxMX2AFjMpra8FEloBHbo5u5d7AIP YNaNUBhPJk4B4+awpe6/vHRUQb/9/BK4x09a9IlgBX9gtwVK8/bxwr/EuXSGti19a8zS80bdL8bg asPDNAMsfZbdWsIOpwqZwQWLqwwv81w6z2w3VQmH3lNAbFjv/LarZW4E9hvcPOBaFcae2fFZSDAh ZQNs7Okhc+ybA6HgN62gFRiP+roCzqcsqRATLNTlCCarIpdg+JBedNSimlO98qlo4KJuwtdssaMP nr/raOdW8q7y4ys4OgmBtWuF174t7T8at7Jj4vViLILUagBBUPE5g5+V6TaWmG4wggTdMIIDxaAD AgECAhBxkvvmGV+sTRKFdHE0ohinMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIDBJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcMB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoMEUNvbW9k byBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMSEwHwYDVQQDDBhBQUEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMwHhcNMDQwMTAx MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYD VQQHEw5TYWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYD VQQLExhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xp ZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALI5haTyfatBO2JGN67NwWB1vDll+UoaR6K5zEjMapjVTTUZuaRC5c5J4oovHnzSMQfHTrSD ZJ0uKdWiZMSFvYVRNXmkTmiQexx6pJKoF/KYFfKTzMmkMpW7DE8wvZigC4vlbhuiRvp4vKJvq1le pS/Pytptqi/rrKGzaqq3Lmc1i3nhHmmI4uZGzaCl6r4LznY6eg6b6vzaJ1s9cx8i5khhxkzzabGo Lhu21DEgLLyCio6kDqXXiUP8FlqvHXHXEVnauocNr/rz4cLwpMVnjNbWVDreCqS6A3ezZcj9HtN0 YqoYymiTHqGFfvVHZcv4TVcodNI0/zC27vZiMBSMLOsCAwEAAaOCAScwggEjMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaA FKARCiM+lvEH7OKvKe+CpX/QMKS0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUH AwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMHsGA1UdHwR0MHIwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2Rv Y2EuY29tL0FBQUNlcnRpZmljYXRlU2VydmljZXMuY3JsMDagNKAyhjBodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9k by5uZXQvQUFBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGVTZXJ2aWNlcy5jcmwwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCdlcs8uH6lCcQevwvCx3aOOTyUxhCqTwzJ4KuEXYlU4GU7820cfDcsJVRf liH8N4SRnRXcFE+Bz1Qda2xFYMct+ZdRTPlmyjyggoymyPDi6dRK+ew/VsnddozDggFPbADzHhph dARHA6nGQFeRvGUixSdnT1fbZFrZjR+6hi/0Bq6cae3p9M8pF9jgSp8aIC+XTFG7RgfEijdOIOMJ MWjHnsSLneh+EbwyaBCWEZhE2CpRYE2I63Q630MGMsg5Vow6EVLTQaRDA/Tt7zMn2zngFE4mydj1 OeKJuJNdtykmQeqzm66D/Hd1yujKtf7iZUpjPkTE0MNeh3OpmByvfxV/MIIGNTCCBR2gAwIBAgIR APUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQI EwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0 d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNF UkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwwHhcNMTAwMjA4MDAwMDAwWhcN MTEwMjA4MjM1OTU5WjCB4DE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQRVJTT05B IE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDMgQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxFzAVBgNVBAMTDkV2ZXJ0IExhbW1lcnRzMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZldmVydC5sYW1t ZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtYAj4sXuBqEwPxYY BMkYLPGrnqT35USIERoWs26xtSY+dLVc7HqaHDZ1lU5m9wFx/Jqph1urlRuAcCj03kGSS23Ta6kt HTRMYRCHI3nOLfEEbH4POT+wDytORUHNeEKp/PrBn1kmKk+dk+bJI7MNdy2XkiEeO+OqKmLiBGkT glIxngOeqgqR2IvmVv2hLAyzq8Ax20inwveZsDMa7QdQLSVUaX1kSRSihwz4Jw9X/K+6oA3ZLGp9 pZYnFHBNTHM2DR/C7dNwQgbZS7TY/Jb1kObYNhwD2JzzJlkoe0blR17MeJkF7/+Y414j0AdPFB7I ggZ4Tm7Maheer9cIQSsvIQIDAQABo4ICGDCCAhQwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUiYJnfcSdJnAAS7RQSHze Pa4Ebn0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFNTyUAqBNg9JXuiPHa9jfLvRM3IyMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjARBglghkgBhvhCAQEE BAMCBSAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAQEwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwgaUGA1UdHwSBnTCBmjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vVVROLVVTRVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBK oEigRoZEaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0L1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwbAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYDBeMDYGCCsGAQUFBzAChipodHRwOi8vY3J0 LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE5BQUFDbGllbnRDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZldmVydC5sYW1tZXJ0c0BzYXJhLm5sMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBaJvuiBPgqdq9MEYH9dj2vW8hprAIBEnOOvfXdoP604kBhSbj3s/l0ZQyQY35W YVAltuJQ365uJKigPQHxS+slpUOAJPEVNmwPUIW0GAjxCPxgLdJgAc4jOV8f7oF3pnfI4ukCmjPN LpaylZzMhFt+t6zDWiMtUqyxK/4on62LoLp2D88lxwxI3q3i00bPlV0wZ+mjzS7vrQGcUgDPWEBL FD0I3pR+Z1EH1qjelBmBJV9paVzfzmoU93LIDJA7/MEUXd3JiMZGEoVd2qE5qIZO4fNJ+Cyo6tu1 ECSQxoL6qN+sBwekiFA9Q/zlUp0HfU6Jt8WmtZ44SOh67LcmCL4ZMYIEaDCCBGQCAQEwgcQwga4x CzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNV BAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1h aWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJ4MBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG 9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEwMDMxMTE2MjQyNFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFNzhseZG edp4Su4e0bvqgAa5NV0aMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIaMAoGCCqG SIb3DQIFMIHVBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgccwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEX MBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEh MB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0 LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQD1By0ffbyGqnOmGBaIfvi/MIHXBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBx6CBxDCBrjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlVUMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5T YWx0IExha2UgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMSEwHwYDVQQLExho dHRwOi8vd3d3LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20xNjA0BgNVBAMTLVVUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50IEF1 dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBFbWFpbAIRAPUHLR99vIaqc6YYFoh++L8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEAJiWcunPtmcQ/JP4twaAhLNeP2PuSbIjckruo7UawOGXLhLIINzs9pDxgXJKW6innrWXO+De6 H7G1fVSuRQILOekOxufzDcz3o0s+9udLwMnMTnMC/pNvzap7LwAhTs615ovA0Vy4vBjnvhusJk7t yDIt5tWe16Xeb4zzOZY3RWj4/INAXpPdj6VUpCnvzgWM0+XAlfg7cQMvNqhTuGJijsDGh7fBU1sz SgtjFoUeKjGnGjBrHQ+mlgNvJRZMfklAv2quVr/uY64kZpjeTDtGv2pcKQVyyABLvfHtc31biXya dPPvDSCkboMOkIw6KtOXpho+5OWsVzaZ0EgfITpPHQAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_01E4_01CAC13F.B20F7BA0-- From general-return-1189-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 18:12:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67361 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 18:12:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 18:12:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 81332 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81239 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81231 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 18:12:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:12:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:12:13 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so152183wyi.35 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:11:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QSXAS7OKLaGcJxZR8u9yesVZLKng4tGGcOVy0ekyJWM=; b=NffTxnqjfiVKCZHHAdlReuejCod/swo4B2gbMYcM2NSl3IqSaxAdjMJDyxSgldPfAK rrg4ltdmv5VwfLPdOdumTW63VmL7khMF+OYdAqDF4w8NfNbm79GRPeiekOZSk6/T6azc jArsv65/RIxwWmPhZM8oRPPbSlstvUmxb7zq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hz88khq5kn8UZH9jGZi6nUoOrvHzM7+ceh/mpuXss9qJc9CRc9qK4ToUPuAIJQVvy4 kcM0JPhqug8Lwy99WPah7awj7zanCPc7gi/MZLM2JMoLDrE3VASy3uBmXYWnYCrKYndu ZmZVr2U37hvi8SlwgM4aFxkalQKlK9tiBE+vk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.182.78 with SMTP id n56mr1165052wem.148.1268331113314; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:11:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:11:53 -0500 Message-ID: <9db00c201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, I finally figured it out. Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant compile-native" Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of requiring them to be redownloaded. Please and thanks. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: > I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X > Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 > > I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to > the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the > dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was > able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local > one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, > and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. > > Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in > HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things > working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I run > make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in > the build output before it quits. > > Any help on building the native libs by either method would be greatly > appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too > complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little issue... > unless it's something simple). > > Christopher > From general-return-1190-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 18:24:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77522 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 18:24:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 18:24:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 8578 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:23:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8542 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8534 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 18:23:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:23:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:23:49 +0000 Received: from walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com (walkduty-lm.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.104.13]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o2BIN9cB041654 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:23:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=0fndibBElurqkcz7Ek86uUEQ5xeHpAuTtuW9RZ4eBvwBGq3oMsc7KV6Q9OPhxHLJ Message-Id: <0373489A-94A8-4CAE-AC98-1DF10ECA9D95@yahoo-inc.com> From: Arun C Murthy To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:23:09 -0800 References: <9db00c201003092045k31990da2j587a9e92235cc7c4@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Of course, please open a jira and attach the patch. Thanks! On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: > Well, I finally figured it out. > > Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. > So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant > compile-native" > > Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? > > Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing > dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of > requiring them to be redownloaded. > > Please and thanks. > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs > wrote: >> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >> >> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >> >> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I >> run >> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >> the build output before it quits. >> >> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be >> greatly >> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little >> issue... >> unless it's something simple). >> >> Christopher >> From general-return-1191-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 18:31:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79617 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 18:31:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 18:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20336 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20300 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20292 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 18:30:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:30:26 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=cD6aQi6O6cETB3utdCb81N5gVpIFDZAZ02sTTL98AuPtZc9QMZhQPR3N 5/FOJTVfC3N1G4SehFg9P0V8lRP+SNxdAltpcvCJFg9JJnv8CAVDrYhRT yiPY8SSJnkcVHAi; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1268332226; x=1299868226; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Native=20libraries=20on=20Mac|Date:=20T hu,=2011=20Mar=202010=2010:29:15=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0 |Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<9db00c 201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com>; bh=o7NAVsWC+2o9PHTuz4bPBFS59H0aO5Ktf5GWzmT/8Ns=; b=eiAiSuymvhOMD0c/7fdvzMTgEpkr8+6POZ+h36WK6hAkM/TTdRebtCTg W32wSBiqIcZcfZSUPAoV2uehSU+Xtf5NvXjooXTi746KQVIujDERnmxUK /1McpeBl3iSJTZH; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,621,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11320157" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:29:16 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:29:15 -0800 Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Native libraries on Mac Thread-Index: AcrBSMDNQwOsTSADKkGPYlTllEJ4Dg== In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit *nods* There is a bug with the bitness detection in general (it breaks horribly on Solaris due to the java executable supporting both). I've started working on a general patch (it a] asks Java what bitness it is and b] asks java which JVM lib to link against), but got sidetracked by switching our scheduler over from fair share to capacity. I wouldn't be surprised if the issue you are seeing doesn't have the same root cause. On 3/11/10 10:11 AM, "Christopher Tubbs" wrote: > Well, I finally figured it out. > > Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. > So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant > compile-native" > > Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? > > Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing > dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of > requiring them to be redownloaded. > > Please and thanks. > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >> >> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >> >> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I run >> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >> the build output before it quits. >> >> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be greatly >> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little issue... >> unless it's something simple). >> >> Christopher >> From general-return-1192-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 18:48:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85106 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 18:48:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 18:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 52734 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52707 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 18:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52699 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 18:47:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:47:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:47:36 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Mime-version: Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=iPqmA09xDVn1vbHWVXDKjW8v/wZJa/eMbxFyb2YmgbeiFMtrEYg13/rr xwcyk2ctJeaiCWhIq7qpJTlhH/IoetMC6GLu1C7j7X9FEZANej+pMtgvg wXre7bKAmNSIgGl; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1268333256; x=1299869256; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Commit=20Log=20Hacks=20(=20https://issues.apa che.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628=0D=0A=20)|Date:=20Thu,=20 11=20Mar=202010=2010:46:20=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"general@hadoop.ap ache.org"=20|Mime-version:=201 .0|Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit; bh=tvj4y8Ikh2NFYQMZfXWih8/G8xspA5mM5579sFEEPqQ=; b=NpYCG3A0uQe80+BVWTsMZH6RXiX05u0EyhqP/GSAObzPuFsSldVbbINY Dv/IRbn5xvoJWzk4vvGNfVqDpbGeV9zX5dn7sfjg8ZD9UrFdGsqZpkPVh AMQqWR15UrS/Ktu; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,621,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11320558" Received: from 172.16.19.141 ([172.16.19.141]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:46:20 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:46:20 -0800 Subject: Commit Log Hacks ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628 ) From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Commit Log Hacks ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628 ) Thread-Index: AcrBSyPAGA1g8gWZ3EqGMBYXauwuNA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Seeing as how our two non-mainline distributions don't have real release notes published, I've built two quick and dirty perl scripts (yes perl! Fear the ops people!) to take the commit log from CDH and the Yahoo! changes files to spit out Confluence-style wiki output. Changing it to other wiki output shouldn't be too difficult. 99% of the time, it gets it correct, but sometimes weirdness happens and it will take some manual cleaning to get it perfect. Anyway, I thought these might be handy for other folks to help compare and contrast the differences between the two. Now it is pretty easy to see how divergent a given distribution is from mainline, how hard it will be for them to rebase onto mainline, etc. Another interesting data point is comparing the official bug description and the description in the commit log.... Have fun. [Files are attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628. I might improve them as we go along, but who knows for sure. ] From general-return-1193-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 19:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89245 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 19:05:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 19:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 78831 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 19:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78790 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 19:04:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78782 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 19:04:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:04:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:04:24 +0000 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so177164wyi.35 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:04:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w/W8MphN4mJb+bpENtrx9pqKpO0Y5YQLBZr92sHK3PY=; b=YB+Am2GW8HitA18ICYPnr1fiBFkLTeuCxQtHAVUGDF2bodAvkwj9nwKBFh0EgbsTOZ C3HVGjFd/csFIIoli8c/u4FPJ1PkadV+SRMbbub4uzsuhl0jWfcGAZ5ua3k04qW33zyi PuCSsfXh+whyCtXK7lDLcIO9GYiFhxK+RTEK0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fHnUYBB/dyAwxOQNKYiyIeTzNTtBkgEG279luYVF8qJhWiLKcjX7Aw8VLKX2GXK71J agOPOhBqyi2/0bhxk/WTOZQz9qpSOo0uxUzJh8xcvVtYq6Ja2U81d9iA9MhkWJO88cYB 7kIxRG13piQO9MELqjbqU/ro1q56hr85L9M+I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.176.212 with SMTP id b62mr995909wem.179.1268334243319; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:04:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <9db00c201003111011r57c1d2e3pdb316522d564f5e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:03 -0500 Message-ID: <9db00c201003111104x26d0dc32o7d07014b012b6c65@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For now, I think it would be sufficient to apply HADOOP-3659 and document the rest. Later, the build.xml can be patched to set the environment correctly. I'm not familiar with ivy to determine how to point to the local lib directory, but I'm sure somebody savvy with ivy could do it easily....or allow it to read ~/.m2/settings.xml to find the servers. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > *nods* > > There is a bug with the bitness detection in general (it breaks horribly on > Solaris due to the java executable supporting both). I've started working on > a general patch (it a] asks Java what bitness it is and b] asks java which > JVM lib to link against), but got sidetracked by switching our scheduler > over from fair share to capacity. > > I wouldn't be surprised if the issue you are seeing doesn't have the same > root cause. > > > On 3/11/10 10:11 AM, "Christopher Tubbs" wrote: > >> Well, I finally figured it out. >> >> Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. >> So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant >> compile-native" >> >> Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? >> >> Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing >> dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of >> requiring them to be redownloaded. >> >> Please and thanks. >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >>> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >>> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >>> >>> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >>> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >>> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >>> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >>> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >>> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >>> >>> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >>> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >>> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I run >>> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >>> the build output before it quits. >>> >>> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be greatly >>> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >>> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little issue... >>> unless it's something simple). >>> >>> Christopher >>> > > From general-return-1194-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 11 19:48:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98932 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 19:48:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 19:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 39961 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 19:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39917 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 19:47:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39909 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 19:47:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:47:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:47:31 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-expf01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.250]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o2BJkqKW075397 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:46:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:user-agent:mime-version:content-type: content-class:x-mimeole:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:x-originalarrivaltime; b=ggR7MZU5AUZZJAntvY7Z9EPPtWIp6ykqLFhfXPD3M6Ib+2ZHdjLCoBfbfvuvnrUH Received: from SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.234]) by SNV-EXPF01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:46:52 -0800 Received: from 10.72.187.241 ([10.72.187.241]) by SNV-EXVS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([207.126.227.82]) via Exchange Front-End Server SNV-WEBMAIL.CORP.YAHOO.COM ([207.126.227.60]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:43:12 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC153.1599624D" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:43:12 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0373489A-94A8-4CAE-AC98-1DF10ECA9D95@yahoo-inc.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Native libraries on Mac Thread-Index: AcrBUHSGWY0BewTnP0uzk57W1E/GVw== From: "Hong Tang" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Mar 2010 19:46:52.0495 (UTC) FILETIME=[98E325F0:01CAC153] ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC153.1599624D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Right, this is similar to the instructions on hadoop-gpl-compression FAQ page: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/wiki/FAQ (the last question). On 3/11/10 10:23 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > Of course, please open a jira and attach the patch. Thanks! >=20 > On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >=20 >> Well, I finally figured it out. >>=20 >> Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. >> So, you have to set CFLAGS=3D"-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant >> compile-native" >>=20 >> Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? >>=20 >> Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing >> dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of >> requiring them to be redownloaded. >>=20 >> Please and thanks. >>=20 >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs >> wrote: >>> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >>> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >>>=20 >>> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >>> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >>> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I = was >>> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >>> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the = dependencies, >>> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >>>=20 >>> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >>> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >>> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I >>> run >>> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >>> the build output before it quits. >>>=20 >>> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be >>> greatly >>> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >>> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little >>> issue... >>> unless it's something simple). >>>=20 >>> Christopher >>>=20 >=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAC153.1599624D-- From general-return-1195-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 00:29:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77817 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 00:29:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 00:29:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 99178 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 00:28:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99085 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 00:28:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81532 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 00:07:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:07:10 -0500 From: Mohammed A Hassan Subject: hadoop 0.20.2 and Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 problem. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Hi, I am working on Ubuntu 9.04/9.10 and hadoop 0.20.2. Here the problem is that for Pseudo Distributed and Distributed clusters, it takes undefined time (1 minute to several minutes, sometimes more than 10 minutes without any result) to up the live nodes. It shows that the number of live nodes is zero in http://localhost:50070/dfshealth.jsp for an uncertain amount of time. Regards M. Hassan From general-return-1196-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 00:36:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79966 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 00:36:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 00:36:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 3342 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 00:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3309 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 00:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3301 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 00:35:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:35:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.189] (HELO mail-pz0-f189.google.com) (209.85.222.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:35:47 +0000 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so467767pzk.2 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:35:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.107.10 with SMTP id j10mr2239130rvm.282.1268354127149; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:35:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:35:07 -0800 Message-ID: <45f85f71003111635j2940bf83g1c26e0d9d7410d98@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: hadoop 0.20.2 and Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 problem. To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd13aac32bc0104818fb5b2 --000e0cd13aac32bc0104818fb5b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, My guess is that the hosts in your cluster are low on entropy. If you jstack the daemons as they are starting up, do you see them stuck in a stace trace inside SecureRandom? -Todd On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Mohammed A Hassan wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on Ubuntu 9.04/9.10 and hadoop 0.20.2. Here the problem is > that for Pseudo Distributed and Distributed clusters, it takes undefined > time (1 minute to several minutes, sometimes more than 10 minutes without > any result) to up the live nodes. > It shows that the number of live nodes is zero in > http://localhost:50070/dfshealth.jsp for an uncertain amount of time. > > Regards > M. Hassan > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --000e0cd13aac32bc0104818fb5b2-- From general-return-1197-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 02:29:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17593 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 02:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 87136 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 02:28:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87084 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 02:28:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87076 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 02:28:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:28:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:28:32 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so397582pwi.35 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:28:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VaAMvDHOm5tgoIt37v4GKcwo38sRqnWa/hQaSwH54b0=; b=xgGa3irBaqzsZ3xsuBBN92D1i4g/4BG+68vBdS4ikEA9sABw7qtFXELTC5Xaoff0T7 1UQ0G3Ws1Sn5M6sCLQdUqsYUvWkVAbRj8/Rx6vJyDaqis69Cr0DVdcPnmt2UMGVQ6IgE TjvaFnQFL4YgDuvsbrZmhRlNQRUwcDbwEaTWs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wgtJCRpLFEsgEvElcSOn1cLuZSvgFUndiqAG5duaglmVW14C6fe9K0JULBrzd5xM0U Ck1vIMuUExd0fB39cfhSL5Si0Ji5/x1hHEYDG+K700yLx6eCFuC0AkxsnAwAho7C/Gfc KPs9DCU2o3aisjMfXt7uN5c7a+MZLhS/abf1s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.100.37 with SMTP id c37mr1944883wam.126.1268360890497; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:28:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0373489A-94A8-4CAE-AC98-1DF10ECA9D95@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:28:10 -0800 Message-ID: <314098691003111828w3fc3e24fx5e89cef26d532fb4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is funny, I just put this together myself, my next step is figuring out why the libjvm.dynlib doesn't actually define the get a jvm instance symbol, for libhdfs. Once that is sorted out, I will have fuse_dfs going on the mac. The build stuff for solaris and macos is ugly, I have ended up hand hacking things to make the paths work, and because they are horrible hacks I don't submit them back. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Hong Tang wrote: > Right, this is similar to the instructions on hadoop-gpl-compression FAQ > page: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/wiki/FAQ (the last > question). > > > On 3/11/10 10:23 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: > >> Of course, please open a jira and attach the patch. Thanks! >> >> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >> >>> Well, I finally figured it out. >>> >>> Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. >>> So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant >>> compile-native" >>> >>> Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? >>> >>> Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing >>> dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of >>> requiring them to be redownloaded. >>> >>> Please and thanks. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs >>> wrote: >>>> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >>>> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >>>> >>>> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >>>> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >>>> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >>>> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >>>> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >>>> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >>>> >>>> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >>>> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >>>> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I >>>> run >>>> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >>>> the build output before it quits. >>>> >>>> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be >>>> greatly >>>> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >>>> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little >>>> issue... >>>> unless it's something simple). >>>> >>>> Christopher >>>> >> > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals From general-return-1198-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 04:00:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36613 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 04:00:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 04:00:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 41895 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 03:59:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41651 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 03:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41643 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 03:59:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:59:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:59:21 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=W8UD6Cu6FReJpPdV4UGKQseejrm743KrFoyCwBC7s8xONt2Nu69ZMXaZ 8If/g3QauFJb3NrvIKJsXR4n+ve66pAlqjZjCXA/Oku6vJWmQhDhvm7F6 lw+yrx5OhE3zRjM; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1268366361; x=1299902361; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20Native=20libraries=20on=20Mac|Date:=20T hu,=2011=20Mar=202010=2019:58:55=20-0800|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0 |Content-transfer-encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<314098 691003111828w3fc3e24fx5e89cef26d532fb4@mail.gmail.com>; bh=nBTu6xmpcvj8X2rZJ8isQcZtwkBm3sTbzW6QKzIyPdM=; b=SoHRFKU1minj4JI/Ik7TYIZSudF2mgwdleSQkArYH9Syc/obiQgUlas7 s/v+XSGq1Pv5kQLLqzLHAmf32IMxa46I9lRo6/i9ayJMzAxUuMBQMX9jz KNOGlc3fJsgOTn4; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,624,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="11672869" Received: from 172.18.36.42 ([172.18.36.42]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:58:56 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:58:55 -0800 Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Native libraries on Mac Thread-Index: AcrBmFWr2zqFhPSEz0uE65o/4tafew== In-Reply-To: <314098691003111828w3fc3e24fx5e89cef26d532fb4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit If you want, I can send you my patches and see if that fixes your issues. Maybe I'll work on this tomorrow and actually get a JIRA posted, etc. lol On 3/11/10 6:28 PM, "Jason Venner" wrote: > It is funny, I just put this together myself, my next step is figuring > out why the libjvm.dynlib doesn't actually define the get a jvm > instance symbol, for libhdfs. Once that is sorted out, I will have > fuse_dfs going on the mac. > The build stuff for solaris and macos is ugly, I have ended up hand > hacking things to make the paths work, and because they are horrible > hacks I don't submit them back. > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Hong Tang wrote: >> Right, this is similar to the instructions on hadoop-gpl-compression FAQ >> page: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/wiki/FAQ (the last >> question). >> >> >> On 3/11/10 10:23 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: >> >>> Of course, please open a jira and attach the patch. Thanks! >>> >>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >>> >>>> Well, I finally figured it out. >>>> >>>> Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. >>>> So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant >>>> compile-native" >>>> >>>> Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? >>>> >>>> Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing >>>> dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of >>>> requiring them to be redownloaded. >>>> >>>> Please and thanks. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs >>>> wrote: >>>>> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >>>>> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >>>>> >>>>> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >>>>> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >>>>> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >>>>> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >>>>> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >>>>> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >>>>> >>>>> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >>>>> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >>>>> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I >>>>> run >>>>> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >>>>> the build output before it quits. >>>>> >>>>> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be >>>>> greatly >>>>> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >>>>> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little >>>>> issue... >>>>> unless it's something simple). >>>>> >>>>> Christopher >>>>> >>> >> >> > > From general-return-1199-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 06:11:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66499 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 06:11:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 06:11:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 32585 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 06:10:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32193 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 06:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32179 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 06:10:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:10:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jason.hadoop@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:10:41 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so486439pwi.35 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:10:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1FyNr6AZpA3jnj7jQKB/cnguiLc08GaMCKU0mByzroI=; b=svrmFaIHfQ40Mo0wKFFwDHSE2aqWv4bp1vIB10ycYk5kcxqm5BQq9OgzsOSnyMk7eo xNYtYlpVwddN/Hq7DT0A3Y9QNWqwVx7SdWBJGybykhmOBAplnuKS4SE3u7GGoZ1FYJGt zZX7pc3zjOwr9W3QUk6iTDSOVb+bhlwpVM0OE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MPzjdh625yjLKLMWV1elLTqXJgh4XnaN3qdZsH7XXVqFVMq+aQfQ9qNAbtvRtM6iZz JUxSQp84+1Oa5lAGtqT/11YtLY1YloXDFv0ZuHkVkLAVBa+izFsiAuyextsHiwnBf5Fj SL55nTuo+rsjKpINjxwhffl9EBmZH5jWGm+ms= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.25.5 with SMTP id c5mr1106602waj.171.1268374221497; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:10:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <314098691003111828w3fc3e24fx5e89cef26d532fb4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:10:21 -0800 Message-ID: <314098691003112210w3b73bc62n974a59a62b62e301@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native libraries on Mac From: Jason Venner To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you Allen. On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > If you want, I can send you my patches and see if that fixes your issues. > > Maybe I'll work on this tomorrow and actually get a JIRA posted, etc. lol > > > > On 3/11/10 6:28 PM, "Jason Venner" wrote: > >> It is funny, I just put this together myself, my next step is figuring >> out why the libjvm.dynlib doesn't actually define the get a jvm >> instance symbol, for libhdfs. Once that is sorted out, I will have >> fuse_dfs going on the mac. >> The build stuff for solaris and macos is ugly, I have ended up hand >> hacking things to make the paths work, and because they are horrible >> hacks I don't submit them back. >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Hong Tang wrote: >>> Right, this is similar to the instructions on hadoop-gpl-compression FAQ >>> page: http://code.google.com/p/hadoop-gpl-compression/wiki/FAQ (the last >>> question). >>> >>> >>> On 3/11/10 10:23 AM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote: >>> >>>> Of course, please open a jira and attach the patch. Thanks! >>>> >>>> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Christopher Tubbs wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, I finally figured it out. >>>>> >>>>> Apparently, the library being generated WAS i386 and not x86_64. >>>>> So, you have to set CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" prior to running "ant >>>>> compile-native" >>>>> >>>>> Think we can get patches into 0.20.3 to fix building on a Mac? >>>>> >>>>> Also, it would be nice if ivy could be preconfigured for grabbing >>>>> dependencies from the lib directory of the tarball, instead of >>>>> requiring them to be redownloaded. >>>>> >>>>> Please and thanks. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Christopher Tubbs >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I'm trying to build the native libraries for hadoop on Mac OS X >>>>>> Leopard (10.5.8) for Hadoop 0.20.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried the "ant compile-native" method, but I don't have access to >>>>>> the internet. I do have a local repository though with all the >>>>>> dependencies (not to mention they are in the $HADOOP_HOME/lib). I was >>>>>> able to edit the build.xml file to point the repository to my local >>>>>> one so I could download ivy, but now ivy can't find the dependencies, >>>>>> and I can't figure out how to point ivy to my maven repository. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since the first method didn't work, I tried applying the patch in >>>>>> HADOOP-3659 (has that been included in 0.20.2?), and got things >>>>>> working with a little messing with aclocal and friends, but when I >>>>>> run >>>>>> make, I get a ZLibCompressor.lo, missing argument for "-m" error in >>>>>> the build output before it quits. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any help on building the native libs by either method would be >>>>>> greatly >>>>>> appreciated (preferably the second method, as ivy seems way too >>>>>> complicated and frustrating to deal with just for this little >>>>>> issue... >>>>>> unless it's something simple). >>>>>> >>>>>> Christopher >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Pro Hadoop, a book to guide you from beginner to hadoop mastery, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1430219424?tag=jewlerymall www.prohadoopbook.com a community for Hadoop Professionals From general-return-1200-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 10:13:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24133 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 10:13:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 10:13:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 10:12:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6639 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 10:12:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6622 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 10:12:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED0BB7DAC for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:08 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sdNWi5L+hrfL for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF21B7DE6 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:07 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1268993515.87407@gzYC4gjtbaPa+CCgbZIbzA Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2CABsEJ002273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:11:55 GMT Message-ID: <4B9A1373.40404@apache.org> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:03 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: hadoop 0.20.2 and Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10 problem. References: <45f85f71003111635j2940bf83g1c26e0d9d7410d98@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45f85f71003111635j2940bf83g1c26e0d9d7410d98@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o2CABsEJ002273 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi, > > My guess is that the hosts in your cluster are low on entropy. > > If you jstack the daemons as they are starting up, do you see them stuck in > a stace trace inside SecureRandom? > > -Todd Or the machines don't know who they are and are stuck in DNS operations. Again a stack trace will show you where things lie > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Mohammed A Hassan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am working on Ubuntu 9.04/9.10 and hadoop 0.20.2. Here the problem is >> that for Pseudo Distributed and Distributed clusters, it takes undefined >> time (1 minute to several minutes, sometimes more than 10 minutes without >> any result) to up the live nodes. >> It shows that the number of live nodes is zero in >> http://localhost:50070/dfshealth.jsp for an uncertain amount of time. >> >> Regards >> M. Hassan >> > > > From general-return-1201-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 12 23:24:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46166 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 23:24:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 23:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 37843 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 23:24:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37651 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 23:24:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37643 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 23:24:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:24:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.178] (HELO mail-px0-f178.google.com) (209.85.216.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:24:07 +0000 Received: by pxi8 with SMTP id 8so1026612pxi.29 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.136.2 with SMTP id o2mr3123652wfn.189.1268436225258; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commit Log Hacks ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628 ) From: Eli Collins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey Allen, CDH now includes Apache style release notes generated from the change log. Hope this helps. http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/testing/hadoop-0.20.1+169.56.releasenotes.h= tml Thanks, Eli On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > Seeing as how our two non-mainline distributions don't have real release > notes published, I've built two quick and dirty perl scripts (yes perl! F= ear > the ops people!) to take the commit log from CDH and the Yahoo! changes > files to spit out Confluence-style wiki output. =A0Changing it to other w= iki > output shouldn't be too difficult. > > 99% of the time, it gets it correct, but sometimes weirdness happens and = it > will take some manual cleaning to get it perfect. > > Anyway, I thought these might be handy for other folks to help compare an= d > contrast the differences between the two. =A0Now it is pretty easy to see= how > divergent a given distribution is from mainline, how hard it will be for > them to rebase onto mainline, etc. =A0Another interesting data point is > comparing the official bug description and the description in the commit > log.... > > Have fun. > > [Files are attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628.= =A0I > might improve them as we go along, but who knows for sure. =A0] > > From general-return-1202-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 13 13:32:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4851 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 13:32:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 13:32:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 25554 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 13:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25504 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 13:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25496 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 13:31:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:31:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 74.125.82.176 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of oded@legolas-media.com) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:31:11 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so512308wyf.35 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:30:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.172.137 with SMTP id t9mr514933wel.169.1268487049569; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:30:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:30:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1703587b1003130530m3e54d1d6r743a39486cf74f1a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Problem with multiple output dirs From: Oded Rosen To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6587a02fde6b20481aea71a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6587a02fde6b20481aea71a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, We get errors when we use MultipleTextOutputFormat to split reduce results into different dirs on the hdfs. The errors will occur only when there are more then ~10 different output dirs. We get no error when using fewer output dirs. I imagine this may be solvable by changing a configuration parameter. Notice this class (MultipleTextOutputFormat) is now deprecated (our servers run hadoop-0.20 but our code is still in 0.18 classes). Will we get the same errors if we work with 0.20 syntax? Here's what we get: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: File /user/hadoop/etl_2010-03-13_03-12-03/_temporary/_attempt_201003050309_0154_r_000000_0/20100111/part-00000 could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1282) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:469) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor24.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:966) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:962) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:960) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:740) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at $Proxy1.addBlock(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invokeMethod(RetryInvocationHandler.java:82) at org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.RetryInvocationHandler.invoke(RetryInvocationHandler.java:59) at $Proxy1.addBlock(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.locateFollowingBlock(DFSClient.java:2932) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(DFSClient.java:2807) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$2000(DFSClient.java:2087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient.java:2274) And also: java.io.IOException: All datanodes 10.21.204.136:50010 are bad. Aborting... at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.processDatanodeError(DFSClient.java:2542) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream.access$1600(DFSClient.java:2087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSClient.java:2251) Thanks, -- Oded --0016e6587a02fde6b20481aea71a-- From general-return-1203-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 13 16:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38314 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 16:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 16:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 57171 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 16:45:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57117 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 16:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57109 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 16:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.197] (HELO mail-iw0-f197.google.com) (209.85.223.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:45:37 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so2338431iwn.2 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:45:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=d507N5++er9WWUmDf4QQynne5UeCVsSdH6j7rdA/w8o=; b=cCER12MNBDS/AAG6sxmzz4cZnnmkpWlcSSA0YxdgNkQGY7BrerkXB0NAOKuogahWj8 WPlwPmp0XCBaAB0o8n3Ih+awNmFCYdKE+NV8OUBSneZxfzP58CA8kbrP5O6l1BArPbJY 2bUloHiz6/3pUajDiohXh1N0Hv4O0w1XO+1K8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Zp3vwQ9IVOnHMA2fdpfP+Kfi625IM2uDmdRXz177nsz8aQ7ta90OCfCRwibKs8J2x0 W3aioIkmqZVEfynajLjWgLpdx6St6yJe3pv/mzAlEAu13ra6LMGy1Q5GdPwMux/NVCTY nlTAVwETkKslOf4NYNPUx6LXpf415FMGVNl8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.174.19 with SMTP id r19mr1066013ibz.15.1268498716682; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:45:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:45:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003130845h243bec01o8aa6eb38678f1828@mail.gmail.com> Subject: configuration question From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have 4 hosts, hostA, hostB, hostC, hostD. I plan on hosting my data directory as follows: hostA: /data hostB: /somedata hostC: /data hostD: /blahBalh Is it possible to give a "macro" for each host in the core-site.xml to say: if (host=hostA): use /data as dfs.data.dir if (host=hostB): use /somedata if (host=hostC): use /data if (host=hostD): use /blahBalh I want to do this because I plan to share the same core-site-xml file From general-return-1204-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 13 18:54:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65220 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 18:54:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 18:54:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 20424 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 18:53:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20361 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 18:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20353 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 18:53:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [166.84.7.136] (HELO vc136.vc.panix.com) (166.84.7.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:53:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD19DC3B2 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:53:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from vc136.vc.panix.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vc136.vc.panix.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oJURE-OFIjjZ for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:53:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from eric-sammers-macbook-pro.local (cpe-66-108-36-45.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.36.45]) by vc136.vc.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BA5DC267 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:53:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B9BDF0D.6090101@lifeless.net> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:53:01 -0500 From: Eric Sammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: configuration question References: <1cbd6f831003130845h243bec01o8aa6eb38678f1828@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003130845h243bec01o8aa6eb38678f1828@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/13/10 11:45 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Is it possible to give a "macro" for each host in the core-site.xml to say: > > if (host=hostA): > use /data as dfs.data.dir > > if (host=hostB): > use /somedata > > if (host=hostC): > use /data > > if (host=hostD): > use /blahBalh > > > I want to do this because I plan to share the same core-site-xml file Usually what people do is use something like Puppet or cfengine and build and deploy configurations from a template. Check out: http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/BigPicture -- Eric Sammer eric@lifeless.net http://esammer.blogspot.com From general-return-1205-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 15 19:02:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20224 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 19:02:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 19:02:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 47686 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 19:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47631 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 19:01:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47623 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 19:01:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:01:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:01:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 19469 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 19:02:20 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.1.110]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:02:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4B9E840C.8010508@apache.org> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:01:32 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [Fwd: [VOTE] Avro release 1.3.1 (rc 0)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FYI, an Avro release vote is in progress on avro-dev@h.a.o. Doug -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [VOTE] Avro release 1.3.1 (rc 0) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:43:12 -0800 From: Doug Cutting To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org I have created a candidate build for Avro release 1.3.1. Changes are listed at: http://tinyurl.com/avro131 Please download, test, and vote by 16 March. http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.3.1-rc0/ Thanks, Doug From general-return-1206-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 15 21:00:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65678 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 21:00:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 21:00:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 15963 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 20:59:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15828 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 20:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15725 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 20:59:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:59:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zshao9@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.197] (HELO mail-iw0-f197.google.com) (209.85.223.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:59:16 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so176186iwn.2 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b/W+jTKB/9dmDKTD7tGaz3esfp+Oqs8bv6VQZuv2GBU=; b=de64Z5VIMFbdjiLJ/mavcV6pyVpj7UxmTsh9S512ztYJQ04JfsvxPz9Hihn2l/1Ch6 RkthL8Kbt4mdqC6Ch56Hil4UHFInJ83fDanwekCnfrEQOuGjdOU75dZ8tLdK8csg/bwS FsoONwYADUzQPUod4Ea/xLZ5C7ShYNYy7g0Vs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pm+KV6mq9cfKRBh8aEdQY3iR62jNU4kDRSAN4gAVdFc/tDijwEW6n8DSqu/bxmPl8s s2FYz0EAI6rnCzK36WNM9whuZL8hBovAZLOuXWA8PZyY9pNCScsJdJGxjlvGdCn+6kUD 6quuV6Y1rFkRrDri5d7eO1I7ZgSf4iFebfy4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.192.131 with SMTP id dq3mr56571ibb.61.1268686734740; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:58:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <34fd060d1003011157k7453df1nba040378bb121a75@mail.gmail.com> References: <34fd060d1002261356u1f37e824x8f879d20ba1ebdb6@mail.gmail.com> <34fd060d1003011157k7453df1nba040378bb121a75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:58:54 -0700 Message-ID: <34fd060d1003151358o59cd58e4la405349e73a0b810@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hive User Group Meeting 3/18/2010 7pm at Facebook From: Zheng Shao To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org, core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just a reminder that we have Hive User Group Meeting this Thursday at Faceb= ook. Please register on http://www.meetup.com/Hive-User-Group-Meeting/calendar/12741356/ if you plan to come. Zheng On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Zheng Shao wrote: > We also created a Meetup group in case you prefer to register on meetup.c= om > > http://www.meetup.com/Hive-User-Group-Meeting/calendar/12741356/ > > We are hosting a Hive User Group Meeting, open to all current and > potential hadoop/hive users. > > Agenda: > * Hive Tutorial (Carl Steinbach, cloudera): 20 min > * Hive User Case Study (Eva Tse, netflix): 20 min > * New Features and API (Hive team, Facebook): 25 min > JDBC/ODBC and CTAS(Create Table As Select) > UDF/UDAF/UDTF (User-defined Functions) > Create View/HBaseInputFormat (Hive and HBase integration) > Hive Join Strategy (How Hive does the join) > SerDe (Hive's serialization/deserialization framework) > > > Hive is a scalable data warehouse infrastructure built on top of > Hadoop. It provides tools to enable easy data ETL, a mechanism to put > structures on the data, and the capability to querying and analysis of > large data sets stored in Hadoop files. Hive defines a simple SQL-like > query language, called HiveQL, that enables users familiar with SQL to > query the data. At the same time, this language also allows > programmers who are familiar with MapReduce to be able to plug in > their custom mappers and reducers to perform more sophisticated > analysis. > > The current largest deployment of Hive is the silver cluster at > Facebook, which consists of 1100 nodes with 8 CPU-cores and 12 > 1TB-disk each. The total capacity is 8800 CPU-cores with 13 PB of raw > storage space. More than 4 TB of compressed data (20+ TB uncompressed) > are loaded into Hive every day. > > > If you'd like to network with fellow Hive/Hadoop users online, feel > free to find them here: > http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=3D319237846974 > > > > Zheng > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Zheng Shao wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We are going to hold the second Hive User Group Meeting at 7PM on >> 3/18/2010 Thursday. >> >> The agenda will be: >> >> * Hive Tutorial: 20 min >> * Hive User Case Study: 20 min >> * New Features and API: 25 min >> =A0JDBC/ODBC and CTAS >> =A0UDF/UDAF/UDTF >> =A0Create View/HBaseInputFormat >> =A0Hive Join Strategy >> =A0SerDe >> >> The audience is beginner to intermediate Hive users/developers. >> >> *** The details are here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=3D319237= 846974 *** >> *** Please RSVP so we can schedule logistics accordingly. *** >> >> -- >> Yours, >> Zheng >> > > > > -- > Yours, > Zheng > --=20 Yours, Zheng From general-return-1207-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 17 05:30:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25608 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 05:30:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 05:30:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 6228 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 05:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6088 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 05:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6080 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 05:29:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:29:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:29:49 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so473104wwc.35 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=h6ue2V/TWpZ11nM+TIfpVEYG+Xq73xgAPakizqTWHlA=; b=ZjZSDtWVmHBvIWgu2G0boIMaiztG3Z+kWPZN/v+n2M2/n8c0+H8f2afn1OTQPfFHz5 3SHyhl7bvxUWiDgtvXb6++0WF5E0wVmUg4PbEvGm2Ezh2ZkcjbmsBBYxxC1AK0e39p+1 b0ZFnPcJ3b+ailfn8lb2DY2CXEWCfdUH3w3c0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=n2ZTBZGlEZWimMTYOfjaKKi2g6u4/zeyPr77gg/Fl9iERoe/0+JqQZmNttI6Axxb3y kbh5542qOuJz02LkpFzwwE8N0caZ8CP/3KbIhEBGYKoCkVpDOtdG0Ch4H4fpFQySOnzz pNl9b65LET9Mt9mDT+Z/7rJeCt3ppHEg+DjJE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.187.148 with SMTP id y20mr172834wem.88.1268803769739; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:29 -0700 Message-ID: <1eabbac31003162229t59389312yf818294187a89d55@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Retrieving job information from JobTracker From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636833958fc2f380481f865bf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636833958fc2f380481f865bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there an easy way to get information about jobs (such as Job status etc) programatically? Basically retrieving all the info that's usually available at: http://localhost:50030/jobtracker.jsp Seems like there was a JIRA issue: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-mapreduce-issues/200908.mbox/%3C1692689010.1251507153184.JavaMail.jira@brutus%3E This one talks about 'XML-based metrics as JSP servlet for JobTracker', but not sure if anything similar (such as REST API) was implemented. Can someone please let me know. Thanks. --001636833958fc2f380481f865bf-- From general-return-1208-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 17 06:44:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45630 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 06:44:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 06:44:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 50411 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 06:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49933 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 06:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49908 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 06:44:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:44:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of weliam.cloud@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:44:31 +0000 Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so353772gyd.35 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:44:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=SkFBjhNlTfRDeUrruS354D32jdcJ70xx6Csmld6czi0=; b=c9pFeGZc6sxaRYDOGHOrfGXeqG2zY9yoDcKICV5xn5Arj3EguBmJIwAb7gpCxyhEga lvcmCFrrSabfDXZZQirUSP/VfghrACM/5JACC2+GR4RuXHMZa7ATQoQIdp2KzHWMWJcq 6n+nqzmoTKuXs+Mv9Lj2SDxMMEibcxibDKF0I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=uNCCrkLxlmJipnwTyPCCml6cvhZcfUCFRAFof8jsZWyCASEO/gzj1QJF4ybeG9t1HM wwraST27sX0TTNOspYHIJkKMk02MT+2A2PyaB/zIxZWg3GU+1q7Qid9QE3yL77A4v5QS WYECrT5GspXr85c3ZD65xk2aDHpApyfMP/MEk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.7.13 with SMTP id 13mr297113agg.75.1268808250120; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:44:10 -0700 (PDT) From: William Kang Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:43:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Distributed hadoop setup 0 live datanode problem in cluster To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user , core-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e7d34095bfe0481f971d8 --0016361e7d34095bfe0481f971d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I just moved from pseudo distributed hadoop to a four machine full distributed hadoop setup. But, after I start the dfs, there is no live node showing up. If I make master a slave too, then the datanode in master machine will show up. I looked up all logs and found no errors. The only thing looks suspicious is the log in the datanode: ************************************ 2010-03-17 02:39:04,003 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC: Server at /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000 not available yet, Zzzzz... 2010-03-17 02:39:06,064 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 0 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:07,076 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 1 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:08,081 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 2 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:09,098 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx6:9000. Already tried 3 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:10,159 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 4 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:11,179 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 5 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:12,221 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 6 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:13,372 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 7 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:14,545 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 8 time(s). 2010-03-17 02:39:15,558 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client: Retrying connect to server: /xx.xx.xx.xx:9000. Already tried 9 time(s). ************************************* Does anybody know what might cause this problem? ssh among these machines are fine without password. The owner of hadoop folder has been changed to the same hadoop user. Thanks! William --0016361e7d34095bfe0481f971d8-- From general-return-1209-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 17 17:12:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13304 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 17:12:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 17:12:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 67353 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 17:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67170 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 17:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67136 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 17:12:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of swatt@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.149] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:30 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2HH3BQd021553; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:03:11 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id o2HHC7WF246476; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:12:07 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o2HHC49j013457; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:12:04 -0600 Received: from d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm123.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.149]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o2HHC4He013450; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:12:04 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: To: general@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Austin Hadoop Users Group - Tomorrow Evening (Thursday) X-KeepSent: 0782D234:D418EB9A-862576E9:005E3C5C; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008 Message-ID: From: Stephen Watt Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:12:03 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 03/17/2010 11:12:03, Serialize complete at 03/17/2010 11:12:03 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005E7CAC862576E9_=" --=_alternative 005E7CAC862576E9_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Folks The Austin HUG is meeting tomorrow night. I hope to see you there. We have speakers from Rackspace (Stu Hood on Cassandra) and IBM (Gino Bustelo on BigSheets). Detailed Information is available at http://austinhug.blogspot.com/ Kind regards Steve Watt --=_alternative 005E7CAC862576E9_=-- From general-return-1210-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 18 03:35:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 662 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 03:35:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 03:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 68970 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 03:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68796 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 03:35:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68788 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 03:35:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:35:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.198] (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.223.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:35:00 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1669951iwn.29 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eiCJThR5X9BUasl48ludyr/BV23Duo1ErZlxvkzKGkY=; b=XC9bsykX34qfRnAqicinkdv5UmT7JPn7lsHFn1GKZ3R18zaVYFRJtcC9GxHbL4iAMu LokC0Bgp50EtoJpLfj/qmz0pdQmzD2gCA8rS77YF1fYveSgy2E82iecuowU1acYrt1mW bhgM/rI29doHthdmSqDYL7begS3HWLmb9LQHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jlVbQd/0mHdaqpPaNlJGAdsaqOQ/PzgrdcbJB+0/JgWgmoVVeL4nz61AvDjVb+d5rV RLMmOvV18nptm6KMU1PL9lapctx1xtj2Acv3itnMEQsuf2xyVuVhjs22rGswExlgTgu6 5bqaJRttcG8VVY0uJ5ECoioNfAVhcfNJmmxV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.14 with SMTP id b14mr738499ibz.26.1268883279544; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:34:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:34:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more questions. I came across this script, http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what its trying to do? MikeThomas: Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 thanks On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wr= ote: > Hey Mag, > > Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improve t= he > existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6616= . > If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added to = the > existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out sooner. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >> >> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wrote= : >> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >> >> >> >> Thanks. :) >> >> >> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every >> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings and >> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >> >> >> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >> >> >> >> Think about the question: =C2=A0Is there a difference between all nod= es in >> one >> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >> >> >> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =C2=A0In both cases, al= l copies >> >> of >> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every >> node >> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >> >> >> >> So there is no difference. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? an= d >> >>> a sample syntax? >> >> >> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >> >> >> > >> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >> > >> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1.1= .* >> for >> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP addres= s >> by >> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.2" >> for >> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >> > >> > From general-return-1211-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 18 05:00:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10632 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 05:00:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 05:00:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 98457 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 05:00:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98262 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 05:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98254 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 05:00:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:00:33 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so838603wyf.35 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=JF/uvriwYgn2BYR0fHyTcffkOuH0StB667S1xZ9Ukio=; b=r7YvnVPaRJv9YK9sdwOICriv0/sHCBvwiROGZtREnofaq1k4mhE7pWVoKu6rnvrXSa cdkzbN8GCiBJKWUymmdhmYRyUQXpUOg1SaxhlTu2lDra1m5jUBaREBUb+LfEauNg2d0s xofeG00v+Cn+u9dNFRpUI4e1OxnNPf7Xo0mek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RcK6qXV46KpdcHjI/dGwMkUOXWpUcGvwWVCBu2WJFzKixnsIAGz/76l+5KBzYFCbGR DVftfytrEtAjDy1ChYOv7A9Tf7b4FBXWEm/1ZfPbANA+PwDoVIH+Y17D567DSbObCPzy H8BeQbBbJLEZkVkAQJv4sRre+NHTg7brk/JQo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.16 with SMTP id z16mr1107123wee.126.1268888411970; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:00:11 -0700 Message-ID: <1eabbac31003172200p59f57bd4q3979ce9b51a86095@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Why is JobInProgress class not public From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d63fe00e1cde04820c1b01 --0016e6d63fe00e1cde04820c1b01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 JobTracker has methods such as getRunningJobs, completedJobs, failedJobs that return a collection of JobInProgress. All these methods are 'public', but the type of elements that they return (JobInProgress) is NOT public. Why? --0016e6d63fe00e1cde04820c1b01-- From general-return-1212-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 18 07:15:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43877 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 07:15:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 07:15:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 79494 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 07:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79313 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 07:15:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79305 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 07:15:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:15:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:15:34 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so848498wwc.35 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:15:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9wJY87RCJ0D5BOtHNSKWZqCG7HlzgorYrIph3x2nbMM=; b=Ob9olCwTtIXAUKLwsgIsucxRS0FiBnoarc7f+frsTgQ+o5M1PF0H3aNDFwGx88vdS0 /1QOZ4OynC/SdZL8I0BFDm231xfYSShIHBRfWGPOiWakEmwv63Wx8YR/psrxcXtpczN3 HEhOzYnwVw/Vzd73o8IfD/elxzx1kGmSpH4jE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ysn4lJckKaIInkrZgGRNz5oBWorR+J9kSev7KMbTiByZm7y2Emo4xM9z53ivKzANme TQdwZ9XUVHusiUkN6y117eVRmbbPTNfkeJh2fM/q71lQR3EM7pyLbxlpC4zzjhIcdkGZ DRtMxdfeg9K1Ij4LhMufia0b+JtbNZZcfsuPI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.156.203 with SMTP id m53mr1127265wek.209.1268896513988; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:15:13 -0400 Message-ID: <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack they are in on the right. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Well, =A0I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more question= s. > > I came across this script, > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts > > but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what > its trying to do? > > > MikeThomas: > > Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax > errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 > > thanks > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher = wrote: >> Hey Mag, >> >> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improve = the >> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-661= 6. >> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added to= the >> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out sooner= . >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >>> >>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wrot= e: >>> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>> >> >>> >> Thanks. :) >>> >> >>> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every >>> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings an= d >>> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>> >> >>> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>> >> >>> >> Think about the question: =A0Is there a difference between all nodes= in >>> one >>> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>> >> >>> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =A0In both cases, all = copies >>> >> of >>> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, every >>> node >>> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>> >> >>> >> So there is no difference. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? a= nd >>> >>> a sample syntax? >>> >> >>> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>> >> >>> > >>> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>> > >>> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1.= 1.* >>> for >>> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP addre= ss >>> by >>> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.2= " >>> for >>> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>> > >>> >> > From general-return-1213-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 18 20:48:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96285 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 20:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 20:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 75004 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 20:48:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74945 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 20:48:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74937 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 20:48:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:35 +0000 Received: from omta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ud5w1d0120SCNGk57koF9u; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:15 +0000 Received: from [10.72.120.91] ([209.131.62.113]) by omta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uko51d00F2SbwD53Vko8tF; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:13 +0000 Message-Id: <0A7BE353-65C7-47BC-9ACD-158BE7ADFD71@apache.org> From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-727791775 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Hadoop sub-project spin outs... Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:48:04 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) --Apple-Mail-5-727791775 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As you may have seen on the various dev lists, some of the Hadoop sub- projects such as HBase and Avro have started discussions on their dev lists about becoming top level Apache projects. This is largely motivated by the Apache board's continued warnings to Hadoop and Lucene against becoming an umbrella project. (Umbrella projects are projects that are meta-projects where the development communities and releases of the sub-projects are largely disjoint.) I've heard some questions about whether if sub-project X becomes a TLP it will be included in events like Hadoop Summit, Hadoop World, etc. For Hadoop Summit and the Bay Area Hadoop User Group meetings, which Yahoo organizes, a change in to a TLP won't change anything. I don't have any reason to believe the other meetings will behave differently. Thanks, Owen --Apple-Mail-5-727791775-- From general-return-1214-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 18 23:30:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47230 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 23:30:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2010 23:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28307 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 23:30:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28245 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2010 23:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28237 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 23:30:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:30:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 47122 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2010 23:30:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.105]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:30:16 +0000 Message-ID: <4BA2B786.4030005@apache.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:30:14 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Avro release 1.3.1 (rc 0) References: <4B9AB570.6020402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks, Tom! We just need one more vote from a Hadoop PMC member to release this. Doug Tom White wrote: > +1 > > Based on checking checksums and signatures, and running tests. > > Tom > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> I have created a candidate build for Avro release 1.3.1. >> >> Changes are listed at: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/avro131 >> >> Please download, test, and vote by 16 March. >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.3.1-rc0/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> Doug >> From general-return-1215-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 00:42:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67169 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 76634 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76589 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76579 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:42:16 +0000 Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6so770206vws.35 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B7sGE1q+UrIyp5KFJexcsLfxeIzhC9mS/iEFOsdYqG4=; b=gg0gk38u+Zn/jz12pG9afaDQM2oMUwhEYYFCFPIlYFdwzPDiRTK6TBjoZWO+ZCwuoV pXGOVW+mgWLaPuJ0w9rgS/jHxU2IwVf3KqIepotwtCSjz9Beahkudtxgva+/iA+ienOz ZAorXkcU+L/eiNTdqkWz6pjwKxIPAb2JQF4P4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QFjt2fPRrJwrobvN6NEQMiX/AZflNQ89bv1fofq8jZrD2Z0YGZFDTua825NaLlsI8Z 1bdA93atCE7TtZBnEEdrgIB98QV1o9F86uWdAE7q+pFg7DEAvgfbnqjK8Yi3VoRWnTkJ +9iE02kAQCL7Kci/FdbgRUPBl2QCAKLCb2Wj4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.126.166 with SMTP id c38mr861378vcs.169.1268959315129; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:41:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:41:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris: This clears up my questions a lot! Thankyou. So, if I have 4 data servers and I want 2 racks. I can do this #!/bin/bash #rack1.sh echo rack1 #bin/bash #rack2.sh echo rack2 So, I can do this for 2 servers topology.script.file.name rack1.sh And for the other 2 servers, I can do this: topology.script.file.name rack2.sh correct? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Christopher Tubbs wro= te: > Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute > your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of > your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. > > The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and > crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left > column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. > > If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology > file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack > they are in on the right. > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> Well, =C2=A0I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more ques= tions. >> >> I came across this script, >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >> >> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >> its trying to do? >> >> >> MikeThomas: >> >> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 >> >> thanks >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher = wrote: >>> Hey Mag, >>> >>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improve= the >>> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-66= 16. >>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added t= o the >>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out soone= r. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >>>> >>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wro= te: >>>> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks. :) >>>> >> >>>> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every >>>> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings a= nd >>>> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>> >> >>>> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>> >> >>>> >> Think about the question: =C2=A0Is there a difference between all n= odes in >>>> one >>>> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>> >> >>>> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =C2=A0In both cases, = all copies >>>> >> of >>>> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, ever= y >>>> node >>>> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>> >> >>>> >> So there is no difference. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? = and >>>> >>> a sample syntax? >>>> >> >>>> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>> > >>>> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1= .1.* >>>> for >>>> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP addr= ess >>>> by >>>> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.= 2" >>>> for >>>> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>> > >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1216-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 01:11:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71884 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 01:11:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 01:11:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 882 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:11:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 838 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:11:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 829 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 01:11:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:11:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:11:45 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2INvO3q008079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:57:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA2CF33.1000504@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:11:15 -0700 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070408020806080508010302" --------------ms070408020806080508010302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/18/2010 05:41 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Chris: > > This clears up my questions a lot! Thankyou. > > So, if I have 4 data servers and I want 2 racks. I can do this > > #!/bin/bash > #rack1.sh > echo rack1 > > #bin/bash > #rack2.sh > echo rack2 > > > So, I can do this for 2 servers > > > > topology.script.file.name > rack1.sh > > > And for the other 2 servers, I can do this: > > > > topology.script.file.name > rack2.sh > > > > correct? Incorrect. You only specify a single topology.script.file.name on the=20 namenode. This attribute is ignored on the datanodes. Also be aware that the namenode invokes the script with the _ip address_ = of each datanode, not the hostname of each datanode. If you need to=20 convert the ip address to a hostname in order to determine which rack=20 the datanode is on, then you have to put that conversion logic in your=20 topology.script.file.name. --Mike > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Christopher Tubbs = wrote: >> Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute >> your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of >> your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. >> >> The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and= >> crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left >> column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. >> >> If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology >> file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack >> they are in on the right. >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> Well, I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more questi= ons. >>> >>> I came across this script, >>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >>> >>> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >>> its trying to do? >>> >>> >>> MikeThomas: >>> >>> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >>> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>>> Hey Mag, >>>> >>>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to impr= ove the >>>> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP= -6616. >>>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be adde= d to the >>>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out so= oner. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM= ! >>>>> >>>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran = wrote: >>>>>> Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats eve= ry >>>>>>>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings= and >>>>>>>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Think about the question: Is there a difference between all node= s in >>>>> one >>>>>>> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all= copies >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, ev= ery >>>>> node >>>>>>> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So there is no difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack= ? and >>>>>>>> a sample syntax? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10= =2E1.1.* >>>>> for >>>>>> rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP ad= dress >>>>> by >>>>>> the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.= 1.2" >>>>> for >>>>>> rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> --------------ms070408020806080508010302 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwMzE5MDEx MTE1WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUDWVt/RDszyoVr1CGTYonVGZ4M5cwXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAIsgUf2uvuEeyHHL5IYo 4AUkMk2q87mWy9z8wtjg3bQ1o43XbRefwtUzWJJeRCIB67HTyhk7PzLwyeu4DPKkoBV6GgSQ 6yCYOANf9bWRMeavCAcFkZIDnOO2YSKrrLZUrGpdx5qI+DVg9H1MXHcotQ4109gZxEpKnCM0 /qECpLMQTCZtoieYAXr5xN0V4IdqyMm65AOSIEdm7pRqeuK5aqa27RCZMV2D2zkGfXfTyuU3 qZI7SSH1LsGDcPuV2Gz4KKbRvdPHkAypfevHfMrvwafcaYqoq3NNW0f8fO08D7KxBUTebNZl eheDQDnJdyaTFkwevdp9HGNHrkAGnT0lef8AAAAAAAA= --------------ms070408020806080508010302-- From general-return-1217-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 01:21:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73488 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 01:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 01:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8342 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8305 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8297 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 01:21:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:21:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:21:32 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2J07JpR008123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:07:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA2D187.2080102@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:21:11 -0700 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040604060707030505030707" --------------ms040604060707030505030707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/17/2010 08:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Well, I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more question= s. > > I came across this script, > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts > > but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what > its trying to do? > > > MikeThomas: > > Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax > errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 Not quite. A couple of lines got incorrectly wrapped. It should look=20 like this: http://pastebin.ca/1845286 --Mike > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher= wrote: >> Hey Mag, >> >> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improv= e the >> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6= 616. >> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added = to the >> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out soon= er. >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >>> >>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wr= ote: >>>> Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. :) >>>>> >>>>>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats every= >>>>>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings a= nd >>>>>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>> >>>>> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>> >>>>> Think about the question: Is there a difference between all nodes = in >>> one >>>>> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>> >>>>> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all c= opies >>>>> of >>>>> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, ever= y >>> node >>>>> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>> >>>>> So there is no difference. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack? = and >>>>>> a sample syntax? >>>>> >>>>> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>> >>>> Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.1= =2E1.* >>> for >>>> rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP addr= ess >>> by >>>> the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1.= 2" >>> for >>>> rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>> >>> >> --------------ms040604060707030505030707 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwMzE5MDEy MTExWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUwl3m28WplQ6TW+zdQty5aQUqNaswXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBALTR3JNn2V0UZnPxSeCD itN+DYSX88fpuGGSSJlgUK8aQMv0lXRFLl408TuYMLbkBZ4hmL9ESuqeSv8QGUEazaRCXNxD lpHBwSekbjwt/r0+vBbhY1Kul1STsmmvhSGgL/NbfyBnthtf5C54naTkWxII1DdykctogyqX WLf8uShitfu8LJSLdWMtDEf8eiRaNGeZNxH/I8C9QwRBCIbcApyir5s7ZK51iXz98X6np78e 15IM8EX7mjAUTSaxp/+9/IhApI+lq/qVB0ZktxDgvZfotlVkjC6PHrLhV2PXug4rm7Ykidpz NadzAwUvvG9DS3dxJJat6UOOjo/Pzh7Emr4AAAAAAAA= --------------ms040604060707030505030707-- From general-return-1218-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 01:27:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86910 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 01:27:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 01:27:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 18901 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:27:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18869 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 01:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18861 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 01:27:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:27:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:27:10 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2J0CtWx008134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:12:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA2D2D7.9060008@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:26:47 -0700 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <4BA2D187.2080102@hep.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <4BA2D187.2080102@hep.caltech.edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030209070508020206040200" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------ms030209070508020206040200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/18/2010 06:21 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > On 03/17/2010 08:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> Well, I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more question= s. >> >> I came across this script, >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >> >> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >> its trying to do? >> >> >> MikeThomas: >> >> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 > > Not quite. A couple of lines got incorrectly wrapped. It should look > like this: > > http://pastebin.ca/1845286 One more miswrapped line. I hate auto-wrapping... http://pastebin.ca/1845290 --Mike > --Mike > >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff >> Hammerbacher wrote: >>> Hey Mag, >>> >>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to >>> improve the >>> existing documentation: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6616. >>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added= >>> to the >>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out >>> sooner. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeff >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM!= >>>> >>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran >>>> wrote: >>>>> Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats ever= y >>>>>>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings = and >>>>>>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Think about the question: Is there a difference between all nodes = in >>>> one >>>>>> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>>> >>>>>> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. In both cases, all >>>>>> copies >>>>>> of >>>>>> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, eve= ry >>>> node >>>>>> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>>> >>>>>> So there is no difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack?= >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> a sample syntax? >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>>> >>>>> Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. >>>>> 10.1.1.* >>>> for >>>>> rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP >>>>> address >>>> by >>>>> the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1= =2E2" >>>> for >>>>> rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>>> >>>> >>> > > --------------ms030209070508020206040200 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwMzE5MDEy NjQ3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUZ1Oi5s+YmPIlPsP8TBLr2gpd4IgwXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAImElMXK9+1TATh/Bhv9 NI9viWhFP5XqqdTNY6BeMkEw7SSFo6U4VboLrdXOaaqh5EcBbZfwFTBojRalneK+VvYgLz3a 6iRDjF0LlBSpqD47Rv8UeK014vnkeLrarQud38iUtx8Zm/crp3AdIENpbVKliRmr9n/q9dU0 lxPOi8eewSH5Su9r65en7ffkX8HLH8LsQELW9ivjQsGXR/b1qODo1XplUZzTZcJzeNkS5FtS CRLHFGbt/KcJxoRvRa9uVTYjSUMiNqIzKl2sqwV2OpzwMHlqwyZVi9sqqGEYW3K4B62cjlTM m2o9RD6mUd4hsHyeJJmKDnk/gQphZaIV88kAAAAAAAA= --------------ms030209070508020206040200-- From general-return-1219-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 05:01:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19284 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 05:01:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 05:01:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 39487 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 05:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39349 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 05:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39341 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 05:00:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:00:54 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1308360wyf.35 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2smDWXzs3A9a5SkoZbwZwrMQsNmIeDpe7Pd8kVxF6ws=; b=upOqqL1603dqBWRVUUyGuPonBbC/+5P9U2E6OB69BvyEjrIscqFi1Y/ys6lRfRiGHg 7V2RE6QoRpyYsBBBrpg9/y3Tl3zUZKQDbRDLycDuyCda7mUQcaOeKzDXn/MlaAyx8AiW b+UIsddNPry5JGQrmHhW6II/ZefuscVL/B5Nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rUvwAG0ZW98uLCQC2c68c4nxvrQsSpOExZ6TOdsNcyREsl7AVq9F0ib75am4yECmHm 9k9PbmNXZj6wOQkAIGfykz9ogAsnjg8quJLq+SBECfkk3yWBB4rLro3lTFn0PhdXr1Wr 6u1JkLNXhiDNn100ftCOuMw7aVsyN9ltRMo80= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.16 with SMTP id x16mr1461105wee.27.1268974833498; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:00:33 -0400 Message-ID: <9db00c201003182200y5d572e87xba1e3e8cf3bd539c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You only specify the script on the namenode. So, you could do something like: #!/bin/bash #rack_decider.sh if [ $1 =3D "server1.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.1" ] ; then echo rack1 elif [ $1 =3D "server2.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.2" ] ; then echo rack1 elif [ $1 =3D "server3.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.3" ] ; then echo rack2 elif [ $1 =3D "server4.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.4" ] ; then echo rack2 else echo unknown_rack fi # EOF Of course, this is by far the most basic script you could have (I'm not sure why it wasn't offered as an example instead of a more complicated one). On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Mag Gam wrote: > Chris: > > This clears up my questions a lot! Thankyou. > > So, if I have 4 data servers and I want 2 racks. I can do this > > #!/bin/bash > #rack1.sh > echo rack1 > > #bin/bash > #rack2.sh > echo rack2 > > > So, I can do this for 2 servers > > > > =A0topology.script.file.name > =A0rack1.sh > > > And for the other 2 servers, I can do this: > > > > =A0topology.script.file.name > =A0rack2.sh > > > > correct? > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Christopher Tubbs w= rote: >> Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute >> your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of >> your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. >> >> The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and >> crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left >> column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. >> >> If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology >> file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack >> they are in on the right. >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> Well, =A0I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more questi= ons. >>> >>> I came across this script, >>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >>> >>> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >>> its trying to do? >>> >>> >>> MikeThomas: >>> >>> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >>> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>>> Hey Mag, >>>> >>>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to improv= e the >>>> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6= 616. >>>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added = to the >>>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out soon= er. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >>>>> >>>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran wr= ote: >>>>> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks. :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats ever= y >>>>> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings = and >>>>> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Think about the question: =A0Is there a difference between all nod= es in >>>>> one >>>>> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =A0In both cases, al= l copies >>>>> >> of >>>>> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, eve= ry >>>>> node >>>>> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> So there is no difference. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack?= and >>>>> >>> a sample syntax? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>>> > >>>>> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10.= 1.1.* >>>>> for >>>>> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP add= ress >>>>> by >>>>> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.1= .2" >>>>> for >>>>> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1220-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 11:32:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8662 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 11:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 11:32:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 61811 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 11:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61774 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 11:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61765 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 11:32:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:32:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:32:41 +0000 Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6so940723vws.35 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:32:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7PEeAjWgHtgOYYn6rPnaQooKZz//NnaocAmS/SLb9/A=; b=kKk3BgxxrKBapO7nap0et753loHVfMVfZYWL+PTOHXwpXX3UMeSp7A+t3hEp/kIdub +Apuw3626p0Z6fPDwmjKzFOow/SIGrCVb2nlvA4dhdcQqqucVS756QFkoHHeU/CG1mPV 0LmObtvFrBLR+y2e6F2DZ4fCMkmH0WdWg0Fn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lTvK7SysOGPcPc6RXtYFYt1ePHMQ2DK8Nb1SYqHAsuatOMVkBZTwkiuLrA9sDhPGsr nxr5CBhom7Qkvbe5d3tHkyiUrOMtgchl5zlLymldnliHfCWlLzpgu4ATctFaxxfxOFIe 8e57dA/2nG68L/unP0AWzi+72KvIEbDPSA0oE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.17 with SMTP id z17mr1584981vco.75.1268998340404; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:32:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9db00c201003182200y5d572e87xba1e3e8cf3bd539c@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003182200y5d572e87xba1e3e8cf3bd539c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:32:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the documentation is lacking for hadoop. Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: #server 1 Input > script.sh Output > rack01 #server 2 Input > script.sh Output > rack02 Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying to understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such as tcl On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Christopher Tubbs wro= te: > You only specify the script on the namenode. > So, you could do something like: > > #!/bin/bash > #rack_decider.sh > > if [ $1 =3D "server1.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.1" ] ; then > =C2=A0echo rack1 > elif [ $1 =3D "server2.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.2" ] ; then > =C2=A0echo rack1 > elif [ $1 =3D "server3.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.3" ] ; then > =C2=A0echo rack2 > elif [ $1 =3D "server4.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.4" ] ; then > =C2=A0echo rack2 > else > =C2=A0echo unknown_rack > fi > # EOF > > Of course, this is by far the most basic script you could have (I'm > not sure why it wasn't offered as an example instead of a more > complicated one). > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >> Chris: >> >> This clears up my questions a lot! Thankyou. >> >> So, if I have 4 data servers and I want 2 racks. I can do this >> >> #!/bin/bash >> #rack1.sh >> echo rack1 >> >> #bin/bash >> #rack2.sh >> echo rack2 >> >> >> So, I can do this for 2 servers >> >> >> >> =C2=A0topology.script.file.name >> =C2=A0rack1.sh >> >> >> And for the other 2 servers, I can do this: >> >> >> >> =C2=A0topology.script.file.name >> =C2=A0rack2.sh >> >> >> >> correct? >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Christopher Tubbs = wrote: >>> Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute >>> your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of >>> your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. >>> >>> The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and >>> crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left >>> column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. >>> >>> If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology >>> file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack >>> they are in on the right. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>> Well, =C2=A0I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more qu= estions. >>>> >>>> I came across this script, >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >>>> >>>> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >>>> its trying to do? >>>> >>>> >>>> MikeThomas: >>>> >>>> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >>>> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>>>> Hey Mag, >>>>> >>>>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to impro= ve the >>>>> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-= 6616. >>>>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be added= to the >>>>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out soo= ner. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM! >>>>>> >>>>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran w= rote: >>>>>> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thanks. :) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats eve= ry >>>>>> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default settings= and >>>>>> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Think about the question: =C2=A0Is there a difference between all= nodes in >>>>>> one >>>>>> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =C2=A0In both cases= , all copies >>>>>> >> of >>>>>> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, ev= ery >>>>>> node >>>>>> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> So there is no difference. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rack= ? and >>>>>> >>> a sample syntax? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 10= .1.1.* >>>>>> for >>>>>> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP ad= dress >>>>>> by >>>>>> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10.= 1.2" >>>>>> for >>>>>> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1221-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 13:36:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52555 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 13:36:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 13:36:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 24241 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 13:36:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24102 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 13:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24094 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 13:36:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:36:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:36:31 +0000 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so1721049wwc.35 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8mQrN6SMgO5Ix6axT+jz4UqJPq8X5U+TBnkhPqW72F8=; b=IWPoUlVbomj3RlatpR2UYYrxIkSNEin55vwrcnT1PZm373c/ksGfzrAOtmHHTX0dGP gj4QkD2fPi6j138ydFzMMdhVBtrNgDglnFIxCFPBaj1IUkyejVr9Ibi7rQQoA5pGoD/u jog7aLqS74J1rF0Liv9t3PmQLG4XiREx/qKCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FifN2mxPgjkXUOVmoX2kcNP8mhrpTAtDmJhToZA2V5Yxa+IZGrom0xaFl4h04r+Y0H 6XwPNxUkK4Q0y9EShbX+vZqmFdqbjkhvN49GNEspyrkrgAGoUyF7WAgGSp1zrXYymjT/ vOqWi9aH7Oxzp6hITRKuZp5HeWWaD0yFg33rw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.211 with SMTP id w61mr1310196wee.50.1269005770276; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8FC1CC.2090108@apache.org> <1cbd6f831003041539r75b360ecrb8e604d4dce1350f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003172034r3d699283hd4e41f5fc0f37231@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003180015n1e4e8941i2c53296edd21258f@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003181741t2f538eb8xc872cba6dfe00761@mail.gmail.com> <9db00c201003182200y5d572e87xba1e3e8cf3bd539c@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:36:10 -0400 Message-ID: <9db00c201003190636v1e572b1bo215aae0e0afe1526@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable More like the following (shown with the bash prompt). You could type this for testing. However, ultimately, hadoop itself will actually be executing this script and reading its output. $ ./script.sh server1.mydomain rack1 $ ./script.sh server2.mydomain rack1 $ ./script.sh server3.mydomain rack2 $ ./script.sh server4.mydomain rack2 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the > documentation is lacking for hadoop. > > Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: > > #server 1 > Input > script.sh > Output > rack01 > > #server 2 > Input > script.sh > Output > rack02 > > > Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying to > understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such > as tcl > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Christopher Tubbs w= rote: >> You only specify the script on the namenode. >> So, you could do something like: >> >> #!/bin/bash >> #rack_decider.sh >> >> if [ $1 =3D "server1.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.1" ] ; then >> =A0echo rack1 >> elif [ $1 =3D "server2.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.2" ] ; then >> =A0echo rack1 >> elif [ $1 =3D "server3.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.3" ] ; then >> =A0echo rack2 >> elif [ $1 =3D "server4.mydomain" -o $1 =3D "192.168.0.4" ] ; then >> =A0echo rack2 >> else >> =A0echo unknown_rack >> fi >> # EOF >> >> Of course, this is by far the most basic script you could have (I'm >> not sure why it wasn't offered as an example instead of a more >> complicated one). >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>> Chris: >>> >>> This clears up my questions a lot! Thankyou. >>> >>> So, if I have 4 data servers and I want 2 racks. I can do this >>> >>> #!/bin/bash >>> #rack1.sh >>> echo rack1 >>> >>> #bin/bash >>> #rack2.sh >>> echo rack2 >>> >>> >>> So, I can do this for 2 servers >>> >>> >>> >>> =A0topology.script.file.name >>> =A0rack1.sh >>> >>> >>> And for the other 2 servers, I can do this: >>> >>> >>> >>> =A0topology.script.file.name >>> =A0rack2.sh >>> >>> >>> >>> correct? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Christopher Tubbs = wrote: >>>> Hadoop will identify data nodes in your cluster by name and execute >>>> your script with the data node as an argument. The expected output of >>>> your script is the name of the rack on which it is located. >>>> >>>> The script you referenced takes the node name as an argument ($1), and >>>> crawls through a separate file looking up that node in the left >>>> column, and printing the value in the second column if it finds it. >>>> >>>> If you were to use this script, you would just create the topology >>>> file that lists all your nodes by name/ip on the left and the rack >>>> they are in on the right. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>>> Well, =A0I didn't really solve the problem. Now I have even more ques= tions. >>>>> >>>>> I came across this script, >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/topology_rack_awareness_scripts >>>>> >>>>> but it makes no sense to me! Can someone please try to explain what >>>>> its trying to do? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> MikeThomas: >>>>> >>>>> Your script isn't working for me. I think there are some syntax >>>>> errors. Is this how its supposed to look: http://pastebin.ca/1844287 >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: >>>>>> Hey Mag, >>>>>> >>>>>> Glad you have solved the problem. I've created a JIRA ticket to impr= ove the >>>>>> existing documentation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP= -6616. >>>>>> If you have some time, it would be useful to hear what could be adde= d to the >>>>>> existing documentation that would have helped you figure this out so= oner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jeff >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mag Gam wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks everyone for explaining this to me instead of giving me RTFM= ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will play around with it and see how far I get. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Steve Loughran = wrote: >>>>>>> > Allen Wittenauer wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On 3/3/10 5:01 PM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> Thanks Alan! Your presentation is very nice! >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Thanks. :) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> "If you don't provide a script for rack awareness, it treats ev= ery >>>>>>> >>> node as if it was its own rack". I am using the default setting= s and >>>>>>> >>> the report still says only 1 rack. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Let's take a different approach to convince you. :) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Think about the question: =A0Is there a difference between all n= odes in >>>>>>> one >>>>>>> >> rack vs. every node acting as a lone rack? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> The answer is no, there isn't any difference. =A0In both cases, = all copies >>>>>>> >> of >>>>>>> >> the blocks can go to pretty much any node. When a MR job runs, e= very >>>>>>> node >>>>>>> >> would either be considered 'off rack' or 'rack-local'. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> So there is no difference. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> Do you mind sharing a script with us on how you determine a rac= k? and >>>>>>> >>> a sample syntax? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Michael has already posted his, so I'll skip this one. :) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Think Mag probably wanted a shell script. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Mag, give your machines IPv4 addresses that map to rack number. 1= 0.1.1.* >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> > rack one, 10.1.2.* for rack 2, etc. Then just filter out the IP a= ddress >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> > the top bytes, returning "10.1.1" for everything in rack one, "10= .1.2" >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> > rack 2; Hadoop will be happy >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > From general-return-1222-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 15:13:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 614 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 15:13:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 15:13:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 67253 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 15:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67176 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 15:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67094 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 15:13:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.25] (HELO esv4-mav03.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:13:45 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=fjjAcrTmxknDFx6Z4UauwQQlFN1Tgr4GlPHruqSGE7jD16jZEi5eNhNT 06cjhHKQuVRrpF9PvKjcrU5Hk3ttf5UETN5FOenp7VwXeZWNoQR6KSVAA AbN0QwI3tU36zFx; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1269011625; x=1300547625; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20rack=20awareness=20help|Date:=20Fri,=20 19=20Mar=202010=2008:13:21=20-0700|Message-ID:=20|To:=20|Mime-version:=201.0|Content-transfer-encoding: =207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786 a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com>; bh=E0CkSxpRGBqlgil53VajpJOatUSYA46EGxKV4qDs6a0=; b=Hsq1TLonNSYJ57R6iCqzIlwR2auQsD6zd8q2EqPjqLg5A2WAARcRAWlW hG16pTuyj4vzEY1uXlDY+I6F7B7tAG1Eg2ZCiSAzc8kMO/y+sevinGDu2 o+W+36uMJQLeiUJ; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,274,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="11472544" Received: from 172.18.36.111 ([172.18.36.111]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.135]) via Exchange Front-End Server mail-access.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.133]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:13:23 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.10.0.080409 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:13:21 -0700 Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Allen Wittenauer To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: rack awareness help Thread-Index: AcrHdrYte1L2fw0FfUGFfGehMPnVdg== In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the > documentation is lacking for hadoop. > > Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: > > #server 1 > Input > script.sh > Output > rack01 > > #server 2 > Input > script.sh > Output > rack02 I think you have it in your head that the NameNode asks the DataNode what rack it is. This is completely backwards. The DataNode has *no* concept of what a rack is. It is purely a storage process. There isn't much logic in it at all. The topology script is *ONLY* run by the NameNode and JobTracker processes. That's it. It is not run on the compute nodes. That setting is completely *ignored* by the DataNode and TaskTracker processes. So to rewrite your use case: # NameNode Input > server 1 Output > rack01 # NameNode Input > server 2 Output > rack02 > Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying to > understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such > as tcl The program logic is : Input -> IP address or Hostname Output -> /racklocation That's it. There is nothing fancy going on here. From general-return-1223-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 16:43:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29393 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 16:43:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 16:43:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 59015 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 16:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58982 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 16:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58974 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 16:43:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jerdavis@speakeasy.net designates 69.17.117.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.17.117.6] (HELO mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:43:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 13325 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 16:43:19 -0000 Received: from c-71-231-206-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (HELO [10.0.1.5]) (jerdavis@[71.231.206.119]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Mar 2010 16:43:19 -0000 Message-Id: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> From: Jeremy Davis To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-15-799490642 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: 0.21 Release Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:43:02 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-15-799490642 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Could someone clarify the position on the 0.21 release? This thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201002.mbox/ kind of died out (it seems) without any resolution. I saw two suggestions: Rebase 0.21 against trunk and then try to release, and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. Was there a final decision on this off list? Thanks. --Apple-Mail-15-799490642-- From general-return-1224-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 18:52:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83638 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 45438 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 18:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45406 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 18:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45398 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 18:52:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.198] (HELO mail-qy0-f198.google.com) (209.85.221.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:52:02 +0000 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so2138097qyk.30 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VhJ8885KEV3mH4+D5z7mJqeCH+tbpw2OK/JcDMByz/I=; b=M4wmTCEyF3h3agGHJFZ1eZUfyGW9Jge97yvIREGiRVd1CCITthwnv8KcbEh0QkyF6o V8lNfYXDtzDhVLk3vltTD7o1WqrZ47R3YuG776mkIbtiG8IWhjS5y5UpoCY2WjS7l2v0 DzATGCGFcyHayAJIj/cBRdRXyP2pPIIEWTuw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QsAE0fgyTggaPicfg3HyTCiVQT+9wHmbjKt9vMNmiNsQuwNCqZo0R0uiK1/IjNQV94 ZjwaPhekHUkJ3HtwlRPCzqLh/Fbz0kCxTIghmOp01DECOnjzzWH/v70Ax732YXNQpVhC 3xlxEhgbBQbCkwv63iVRb4qIpHrb7mrRuSs8o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.81.81 with SMTP id w17mr4481689qck.4.1269024701452; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:51:41 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5500f798bf56bb64 Message-ID: <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.21 Release From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis wrote: > ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. Was > there a final decision on this off list? > On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21 hadoop branch but I subsequently decided against it after chatting with folks and figuring that the only group that seemed interested in driving a release of the hadoop 0.21 branch was the hbase crew. If I were to guess, an hadoop vouched for by a couple of hbasers with their spotty hdfs and mapreduce knowledge probably wouldn't have the penetration of a release backed by, say, a Yahoo. No one would trust their data to such a release. If no data in hadoop 0.21 clusters, hbase wouldn't have anything to run against. So I let it go and figured time could be spent better elsewhere; e.g. helping test the set of patches that could get us a sync/flush/append on a patched hadoop 0.20 (hdfs-200, etc.). Sorry, I should have added a note to cited thread that I'd wandered... St.Ack From general-return-1225-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 19:18:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92980 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 19:18:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 19:18:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 93142 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93100 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93092 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 19:18:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:18:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jerdavis@speakeasy.net designates 69.17.117.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.17.117.6] (HELO mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:18:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 27334 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 19:17:41 -0000 Received: from c-71-231-206-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (HELO [10.0.1.5]) (jerdavis@[71.231.206.119]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Mar 2010 19:17:41 -0000 Message-Id: From: Jeremy Davis To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 0.21 Release Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:17:40 -0700 References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Thank you for your reply, So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/ append functionality? You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, with your preference being a patch set against 0.20. We definitely have an application for this specific functionality, and I need to provide some direction/answers in this area for my colleagues. For example, I might say: We will install the current 0.21 now, and develop against it.. But in X time we will install CDH2 (and get all the goodness it brings), and then apply a given patch set against it. Is this in line with what you are thinking? If so, could I get your perceived level of effort, maybe a time frame? April/May/June/ etc.. I'm sure I'm not the only one that has plans for this feature, as it's in "Hadoop: the Definitive Guide" by O'Reilly published in September '09. Thanks, -JD On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis > wrote: >> ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release >> manager. Was >> there a final decision on this off list? >> > > On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for > releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21 hadoop branch but I > subsequently decided against it after chatting with folks and figuring > that the only group that seemed interested in driving a release of the > hadoop 0.21 branch was the hbase crew. If I were to guess, an hadoop > vouched for by a couple of hbasers with their spotty hdfs and > mapreduce knowledge probably wouldn't have the penetration of a > release backed by, say, a Yahoo. No one would trust their data to > such a release. If no data in hadoop 0.21 clusters, hbase wouldn't > have anything to run against. So I let it go and figured time could > be spent better elsewhere; e.g. helping test the set of patches that > could get us a sync/flush/append on a patched hadoop 0.20 (hdfs-200, > etc.). > > Sorry, I should have added a note to cited thread that I'd wandered... > > St.Ack From general-return-1226-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 19:32:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96856 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 19:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 19:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19844 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:32:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19694 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19686 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 19:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.201] (HELO mail-iw0-f201.google.com) (209.85.223.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:32:06 +0000 Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1188095iwn.2 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:31:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.169.144 with SMTP id z16mr1771959iby.25.1269027105368; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:31:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:31:25 -0700 Message-ID: <45f85f71003191231w23227cb1q7896f8c4e18b5a89@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.21 Release To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d26c5ad36a3704822c65ef --0016e6d26c5ad36a3704822c65ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote: > Thank you for your reply, > > So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS > sync/flush/append functionality? > You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, > with your preference being a patch set against 0.20. > > We definitely have an application for this specific functionality, and I > need to provide some direction/answers in this area for my colleagues. > > For example, I might say: We will install the current 0.21 now, and develop > against it.. But in X time we will install CDH2 (and get all the goodness it > brings), and then apply a given patch set against it. Is this in line with > what you are thinking? If so, could I get your perceived level of effort, > maybe a time frame? April/May/June/ etc.. > > FYI the 0.20 sync patches mentioned by Stack will be going into CDH3 at some point this spring. This is mainly for the benefit of HBase but of course other applications will benefit as well. Thanks -Todd > I'm sure I'm not the only one that has plans for this feature, as it's in > "Hadoop: the Definitive Guide" by O'Reilly published in September '09. > > Thanks, > -JD > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Stack wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis >> wrote: >> >>> ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. >>> Was >>> there a final decision on this off list? >>> >>> >> On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for >> releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21 hadoop branch but I >> subsequently decided against it after chatting with folks and figuring >> that the only group that seemed interested in driving a release of the >> hadoop 0.21 branch was the hbase crew. If I were to guess, an hadoop >> vouched for by a couple of hbasers with their spotty hdfs and >> mapreduce knowledge probably wouldn't have the penetration of a >> release backed by, say, a Yahoo. No one would trust their data to >> such a release. If no data in hadoop 0.21 clusters, hbase wouldn't >> have anything to run against. So I let it go and figured time could >> be spent better elsewhere; e.g. helping test the set of patches that >> could get us a sync/flush/append on a patched hadoop 0.20 (hdfs-200, >> etc.). >> >> Sorry, I should have added a note to cited thread that I'd wandered... >> >> St.Ack >> > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --0016e6d26c5ad36a3704822c65ef-- From general-return-1227-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 19:46:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 278 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 19:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 19:46:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 33741 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:46:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33691 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 19:46:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33683 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 19:46:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:46:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:46:27 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so767705qwh.35 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x6Ciedq0JqBgg+7v6TFww9ki882zScaupQuwEK8xrqg=; b=Cq0F+c0H2hWk2F1HuACq5gsNIDqvShKQhYi170Xhk5ELn4b7YJ4hgyqAMaaYVhFIfw dUj2+qreVs410Fw8GGJgg0UxTuUbG1Rx1FYydfHTrU3I9pMWR2KE1sNY/8XNKYtJEiCb Gqxdt6BwYV1EpmaXFQXVKG+8bD8SIDI0fkMmQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nsIn1nVk0yOXm7hds4u7dPYYd+uX/fS15bY/qgHHjT98vkVxK9iAPkAEJtSa4kK63a CHLADJFfXOT305km0K20IVUZeuR87U+IEXCVHeavFrRTbDNI6hQn0KAG2xT/SrfKgZNh YXJPhoBzwmxbLNuLMengQasNQpzU9kX+4/AqE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.251.72 with SMTP id mr8mr1083594qcb.30.1269027966834; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:46:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45f85f71003191231w23227cb1q7896f8c4e18b5a89@mail.gmail.com> References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> <45f85f71003191231w23227cb1q7896f8c4e18b5a89@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:46:06 -0700 Message-ID: <17e273101003191246m4786a9e9m4c7112fd07177814@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.21 Release From: Ted Yu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b808c2c5a2904822c99c8 --0016363b808c2c5a2904822c99c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I want to bring up the issue about shuffler from thread: Shuffle In Memory OutOfMemoryError I was expecting improved performance from MAPREDUCE-1182 That would be one of the reasons for people to try out 0.21 release Regards On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis >wrote: > > > Thank you for your reply, > > > > So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS > > sync/flush/append functionality? > > You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, > > with your preference being a patch set against 0.20. > > > > We definitely have an application for this specific functionality, and I > > need to provide some direction/answers in this area for my colleagues. > > > > For example, I might say: We will install the current 0.21 now, and > develop > > against it.. But in X time we will install CDH2 (and get all the goodness > it > > brings), and then apply a given patch set against it. Is this in line > with > > what you are thinking? If so, could I get your perceived level of effort, > > maybe a time frame? April/May/June/ etc.. > > > > > FYI the 0.20 sync patches mentioned by Stack will be going into CDH3 at > some > point this spring. This is mainly for the benefit of HBase but of course > other applications will benefit as well. > > Thanks > -Todd > > > > I'm sure I'm not the only one that has plans for this feature, as it's in > > "Hadoop: the Definitive Guide" by O'Reilly published in September '09. > > > > Thanks, > > -JD > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Stack wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis > >> wrote: > >> > >>> ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. > >>> Was > >>> there a final decision on this off list? > >>> > >>> > >> On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for > >> releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21 hadoop branch but I > >> subsequently decided against it after chatting with folks and figuring > >> that the only group that seemed interested in driving a release of the > >> hadoop 0.21 branch was the hbase crew. If I were to guess, an hadoop > >> vouched for by a couple of hbasers with their spotty hdfs and > >> mapreduce knowledge probably wouldn't have the penetration of a > >> release backed by, say, a Yahoo. No one would trust their data to > >> such a release. If no data in hadoop 0.21 clusters, hbase wouldn't > >> have anything to run against. So I let it go and figured time could > >> be spent better elsewhere; e.g. helping test the set of patches that > >> could get us a sync/flush/append on a patched hadoop 0.20 (hdfs-200, > >> etc.). > >> > >> Sorry, I should have added a note to cited thread that I'd wandered... > >> > >> St.Ack > >> > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > --0016363b808c2c5a2904822c99c8-- From general-return-1228-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 19 20:01:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4413 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2010 20:01:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 51818 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51764 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51755 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:01:43 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so772257qwh.35 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5GLkihGxcKEue1Y9k1cud7gEk/VYJyht4nbHgt/YOMc=; b=FiH7cCdf1IsMUKwb+wLgskwG+YM1lbcPy0TMhJP20FcVHzdVruC6xC//V14AslWqmZ JYYgyGFM4azHnUr/B2k5F/csFkAsxE0UR93xaxJ2C81vm4W0CCrVTv94/d0dSaper+8f pqPw0b3jQJYvjs5tlqsd1b+qAs+EMnTVADjBo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dRjiok981DAWwcRVRvbYc/nsjeDOMeVczJaYE9zD1eqXc5nTqiOIlV2rrWhOOKHPE+ tJ+Qz5HpsLa1ZrBlXwbx4bXTpAjEniAQlVaAKpGR+/EYZ2Sw6ytbjElK5bcfg2esfzfs NA3fqWZ0Il2QCr14SV0g+dgcWYY25iAge4Wwo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.104.195 with SMTP id q3mr1674941qco.56.1269028881045; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:01:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a1a9cb0034593512 Message-ID: <7c962aed1003191301q1f5ceef7ua0e30fec30ed3bb5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 0.21 Release From: Stack To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis wrote: > So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/append > functionality? > You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, with > your preference being a patch set against 0.20. > There'll be a hadoop release that ships with the working sync/append (In our testing, whats in the 0.21 branch+TRUNK, hdfs-265, works very nicely). I'm just not sure when. St.Ack From general-return-1229-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 20 18:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94924 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2010 12:55:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2010 12:55:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 90864 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 12:55:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90801 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 12:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90792 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2010 12:55:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:55:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of magawake@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.193] (HELO mail-iw0-f193.google.com) (209.85.223.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:55:29 +0000 Received: by iwn31 with SMTP id 31so3556087iwn.30 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QiHWLRDGzMW/xIY3JfLoTrCUgpe/saye5ihsOpsaotY=; b=IZYDH+Scz076oJQEZj6GaHYjjKBmn0bJzBFEHXyXITKUE0VCtAPI/4Uhhl8LJIP77o e+R90jF0zmk7rE085QwwdHH1N+CFCBi3bq19VNWdyKwfnUOxB5HmMBeRPfE9c0vK+1vJ O/Wq0VAJ67QUcrstLmrnvv13Jvo9oGJCFcByo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=D7d3XCXAglmIvSQZ0p6pE4nH2zKmNRp2PyMmmn+uGfRPzP7rzywaAIeCvHRho8TVo5 ouzou/JqsZkjZ3jLAvdLqe6Q1bHNUUgd32A/QyMSZpc8GfQykPI2o04szCbu6gLl5+p7 2Bj4Xn+/9j76AaUqI2RUwSni1186G12bXwNJs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.19 with SMTP id ca19mr643048ibb.58.1269089709012; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:55:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1cbd6f831003200555o1f78c8f8p9dcef4a21ef94b8c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Mag Gam To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks! I managed to write a script which will give me rack01, rack02 depending on the ip address. Now, how would I check how many racks there are in my cluster? That not documented anywhere. My intention is after I get all this working is to submit a bug report for the documentation team so they can fix this. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > > On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: > >> Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the >> documentation is lacking for hadoop. >> >> Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: >> >> #server 1 >> Input > script.sh >> Output > rack01 >> >> #server 2 >> Input > script.sh >> Output > rack02 > > I think you have it in your head that the NameNode asks the DataNode what > rack it is. =C2=A0This is completely backwards. =C2=A0The DataNode has *n= o* concept of > what a rack is. =C2=A0It is purely a storage process. =C2=A0There isn't m= uch logic in > it at all. > > The topology script is *ONLY* run by the NameNode and JobTracker processe= s. > That's it. =C2=A0It is not run on the compute nodes. =C2=A0That setting i= s completely > *ignored* by the DataNode and TaskTracker processes. > > So to rewrite your use case: > > # NameNode > Input > server 1 > Output > rack01 > > # NameNode > Input > server 2 > Output > rack02 > >> Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying to >> understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such >> as tcl > > > The program logic is : > > Input -> IP address or Hostname > Output -> /racklocation > > That's it. =C2=A0There is nothing fancy going on here. > > From general-return-1230-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 20 18:08:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99223 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2010 13:46:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2010 13:46:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 21960 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 13:46:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21910 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 13:46:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21902 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2010 13:46:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:46:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ctubbsii@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:46:45 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1792291wyf.35 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:46:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QQtfGys4jJO+bCer9nD+KgiRDwTpwzGn+YCSGSNzG1A=; b=AhthjcJSA4+RRvnFTZQfH62smePix7Ibp2nT4sIPbpWzcqTi1Gqc3P2jUlz+S0vITK kfg9nxeTBktwxFcnuDb2FRZy5SHC4y1GTgqLxbT/7ch/rgqkK8KOO0neavwp//wFQWfS kRp9I1E1jUx/JuFwQuUpHxcil+oNy4quPH9Jw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=igkKpT4mqEvRhpSPSYMiRaHIEDgusnWzAtdqdAgznv4ICtccXBxLK+wHlBv6Ya0AMN xydZrP6HX8ry56n57jn5Jg3SxAuPLA09BIj/Cbw5FF0JT7l4Pd1UUtZl1r2oY4elzPrI Muwyqb6XTbuvKBZ4tiO5C/Uv6pCtSt4nvG6SU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.78 with SMTP id t56mr1724082wee.223.1269092783760; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:46:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003200555o1f78c8f8p9dcef4a21ef94b8c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003200555o1f78c8f8p9dcef4a21ef94b8c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:46:23 -0400 Message-ID: <9db00c201003200646y4f3ca892l6b066b6c9877a81e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: rack awareness help From: Christopher Tubbs To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think hadoop's fsck will report the number of racks. On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks! > > I managed to write a script which will give me rack01, rack02 > depending on the ip address. > > Now, how would I check how many racks there are in my cluster? That > not documented anywhere. > > My intention is after I get all this working is to submit a bug report > for the documentation team so they can fix this. > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the >>> documentation is lacking for hadoop. >>> >>> Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: >>> >>> #server 1 >>> Input > script.sh >>> Output > rack01 >>> >>> #server 2 >>> Input > script.sh >>> Output > rack02 >> >> I think you have it in your head that the NameNode asks the DataNode wha= t >> rack it is. =A0This is completely backwards. =A0The DataNode has *no* co= ncept of >> what a rack is. =A0It is purely a storage process. =A0There isn't much l= ogic in >> it at all. >> >> The topology script is *ONLY* run by the NameNode and JobTracker process= es. >> That's it. =A0It is not run on the compute nodes. =A0That setting is com= pletely >> *ignored* by the DataNode and TaskTracker processes. >> >> So to rewrite your use case: >> >> # NameNode >> Input > server 1 >> Output > rack01 >> >> # NameNode >> Input > server 2 >> Output > rack02 >> >>> Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying to >>> understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such >>> as tcl >> >> >> The program logic is : >> >> Input -> IP address or Hostname >> Output -> /racklocation >> >> That's it. =A0There is nothing fancy going on here. >> >> > From general-return-1231-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 20 18:09:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12392 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2010 18:05:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2010 18:05:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 79042 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 16:16:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78942 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2010 16:16:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78926 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2010 16:16:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:16:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.81.36.244] (HELO foobar.kobold.org) (64.81.36.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:16:02 +0000 Received: from owl.kobold.org (owl.kobold.org [192.168.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by foobar.kobold.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2KF1Qkp021361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:01:26 -0700 Message-ID: <4BA4F4AB.7000904@hep.caltech.edu> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:15:39 -0700 From: Michael Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: rack awareness help References: <1cbd6f831003190432l1845d62cl2c786a4a1e35d136@mail.gmail.com> <1cbd6f831003200555o1f78c8f8p9dcef4a21ef94b8c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1cbd6f831003200555o1f78c8f8p9dcef4a21ef94b8c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050308010006070902000402" --------------ms050308010006070902000402 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/20/2010 05:55 AM, Mag Gam wrote: > Thanks! > > I managed to write a script which will give me rack01, rack02 > depending on the ip address. > > Now, how would I check how many racks there are in my cluster? That > not documented anywhere. 'hadoop fsck /' will report the # of racks at the end: [...] Number of data-nodes: 163 Number of racks: 12 You can verify the IP-to-rack mappings with 'hadoop dfsadmin -report': [...] Name: 10.3.255.144:50010 Rack: /Rack12 [...] Name: 10.3.255.62:50010 Rack: /Rack16 --Mike > My intention is after I get all this working is to submit a bug report > for the documentation team so they can fix this. > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, "Mag Gam" wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the >>> documentation is lacking for hadoop. >>> >>> Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: >>> >>> #server 1 >>> Input> script.sh >>> Output> rack01 >>> >>> #server 2 >>> Input> script.sh >>> Output> rack02 >> >> I think you have it in your head that the NameNode asks the DataNode w= hat >> rack it is. This is completely backwards. The DataNode has *no* conc= ept of >> what a rack is. It is purely a storage process. There isn't much log= ic in >> it at all. >> >> The topology script is *ONLY* run by the NameNode and JobTracker proce= sses. >> That's it. It is not run on the compute nodes. That setting is compl= etely >> *ignored* by the DataNode and TaskTracker processes. >> >> So to rewrite your use case: >> >> # NameNode >> Input> server 1 >> Output> rack01 >> >> # NameNode >> Input> server 2 >> Output> rack02 >> >>> Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with bash so I am trying t= o >>> understand the logic so I can implement it with another language such= >>> as tcl >> >> >> The program logic is : >> >> Input -> IP address or Hostname >> Output -> /racklocation >> >> That's it. There is nothing fancy going on here. >> >> --------------ms050308010006070902000402 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMVjCC A/gwggLgoAMCAQICASkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA25ldDES MBAGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWAkVTMQ4wDAYDVQQKEwVFU25ldDEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNh dGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0VTbmV0IFJvb3QgQ0EgMTAeFw0wMjEyMDUwODAw MDBaFw0xMzAxMjUwODAwMDBaMGkxEzARBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/Is ZAEZFghET0VHcmlkczEgMB4GA1UECxMXQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgQXV0aG9yaXRpZXMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDURPRUdyaWRzIENBIDEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC09dYj YaPbCD5mtbiQb7Ka3y1qAm0ZcqKCFciWcfe8Kwcuy9tjHuIsLf9ZItdkDW4xy8sua9nJlx3K lwjtumTMtOtg35KZCknUd8KM4VGTSFdLVG9AbNayef76caVCGM1+jyF0Lq03kauGOPTcNfZe 1TZa3e1c9rc8ljV5OSWa/mfsCACyS5zFIWu0yIDNyJdf+n0hwaPN53wllpJ30taD+JBjQ7h2 k4xRWzeaznLOb9OztZVRA/1sVze+iczFh2xwa4VdGy0eIIPw1pfvYwxO36rm0S109qvbsNla roPRbxerPKakQLpKe034Xcx7gBPqUk/FxoRRWin5EWN3rz9LAgMBAAGjgZ4wgZswDgYDVR0P AQH/BAQDAgGGMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIAhzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb 2Y0XDV0wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUvF1NSC/4NZRZq1yJSz7RsjoUAeowDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB /zAlBgNVHREEHjAcgRpET0VHcmlkcy1DQS0xQGRvZWdyaWRzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUF AAOCAQEAZNVrIDLqe39CEOiJt7Q7EpBPhAihMvDTSf/42u0SMbUmChww4mLmph5DBghZUVF8 Yn59kRZMn1QLOtO1HzLqvAvPITacZVPlJgG2IXzlR636YghZFAycbIUEOJDBHR4vtQO1KDxg ZwvAbtmKIoxvhUCq2xsfFt9kCBBn+JYtQ6O5LsBJq3PmuubeMcc7mbQAfJZ7h/3QghgkFIhm E1+LBXPJbkuP8vgfg6h2BKoAf5TFfZECgGZKimfN110tBvfedGZwYYd3/GsJc83B0JN1gny0 gqNVPm392UchXGeBRrHnm2gkhIkr48Oq6EmNGV9/a6XfbplQW/JWbtPVPWkaizCCBCkwggMR oAMCAQICAwChZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYDb3JnMRgwFgYK CZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0aWVz MRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxMB4XDTEwMDEyNTE4MzEyMFoXDTExMDEyNTE4MzEy MFowYDETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCGRvZWdyaWRzMQ8w DQYDVQQLEwZQZW9wbGUxHjAcBgNVBAMTFU1pY2hhZWwgVGhvbWFzIDcyNTM3NDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALchCLXStiJKw5u2+nFW0020jqo1X8/kRB9kus8a 6Op5ds3j5O3IZkyZ41tQwE9Rc0yRDiDGpT1jL/n2LK1HPXvZbasmPCxxTMY3kNTm4fWAnRS7 UzLo0Adaz81bcT8Buo7Il1FCS684LhsK19JChqU2/iY8G7H0uBImj6QDLR0+w5QsLfD7aOXx M8Njhse1ZqMyjwjhw5FqWyWNhlKi1oW42eXtYhbsqyAQZSXLoz2SwqBnLTRqcRMn4GgvB83Z 1FObyb79HFiuqlbaMlXWy0s8ywajJnMG8LsgwkNJZQLJsPalz5rwe/pOG1abasLMBVpJGGSB AQktY8s5M+U9RlMCAwEAAaOB4jCB3zARBglghkgBhvhCAQEEBAMCBeAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQD AgTwMDYGA1UdIAQvMC0wDQYLKoZIhvdMAwcBAwEwDAYKKoZIhvdMBQICATAOBgwqhkiG90wF AgMCAQEwPgYDVR0fBDcwNTAzoDGgL4YtaHR0cDovL2NybC5kb2Vncmlkcy5vcmcvMWMzZjJj YTgvMWMzZjJjYTguY3JsMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFnRob21hc0BoZXAuY2FsdGVjaC5lZHUwHwYD VR0jBBgwFoAUyhkdEo5upDhdQtQxDgjb2Y0XDV0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAGcleFpm d9Ho37gHZrrF0zulSQ3Aemrbx2O4EVJotQbtAs2v4nnH0eAa0F37BXRA6DAvgaC4YODA6z5M HHE2mnsIebv0nS8DLj1yN7C1nqDSUXlaIzExEGQ1vXG2XlVo6pMZgJd2ML9+dyUUOcnNj0kQ GeMysWBHbDChdfVG8y2PuGzoFY/ikNtWWhTNcPVZHIL5I2JCYqV5lyLQhlkC0Q5eqbqYKAq1 GuQmLO8hPfzkb6qbAkzxB8/FFqjlPgBgFcd9Nf2fAI14kI77iRbEuu8jSTPx13p6uYvcX4hy 1cW4Y7lnE8bBkAFWrUuNGc+aw7Ang6rJANWXtF/tN+UqUOcwggQpMIIDEaADAgECAgMAoWcw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkW CERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMN RE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMTAeFw0xMDAxMjUxODMxMjBaFw0xMTAxMjUxODMxMjBaMGAxEzARBgoJ kiaJk/IsZAEZFgNvcmcxGDAWBgoJkiaJk/IsZAEZFghkb2VncmlkczEPMA0GA1UECxMGUGVv cGxlMR4wHAYDVQQDExVNaWNoYWVsIFRob21hcyA3MjUzNzQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC3IQi10rYiSsObtvpxVtNNtI6qNV/P5EQfZLrPGujqeXbN4+TtyGZM meNbUMBPUXNMkQ4gxqU9Yy/59iytRz172W2rJjwscUzGN5DU5uH1gJ0Uu1My6NAHWs/NW3E/ AbqOyJdRQkuvOC4bCtfSQoalNv4mPBux9LgSJo+kAy0dPsOULC3w+2jl8TPDY4bHtWajMo8I 4cORalsljYZSotaFuNnl7WIW7KsgEGUly6M9ksKgZy00anETJ+BoLwfN2dRTm8m+/RxYrqpW 2jJV1stLPMsGoyZzBvC7IMJDSWUCybD2pc+a8Hv6ThtWm2rCzAVaSRhkgQEJLWPLOTPlPUZT AgMBAAGjgeIwgd8wEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgXgMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIE8DA2BgNVHSAE LzAtMA0GCyqGSIb3TAMHAQMBMAwGCiqGSIb3TAUCAgEwDgYMKoZIhvdMBQIDAgEBMD4GA1Ud HwQ3MDUwM6AxoC+GLWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuZG9lZ3JpZHMub3JnLzFjM2YyY2E4LzFjM2YyY2E4 LmNybDAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZ0aG9tYXNAaGVwLmNhbHRlY2guZWR1MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFMoZ HRKObqQ4XULUMQ4I29mNFw1dMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQBnJXhaZnfR6N+4B2a6xdM7 pUkNwHpq28djuBFSaLUG7QLNr+J5x9HgGtBd+wV0QOgwL4GguGDgwOs+TBxxNpp7CHm79J0v Ay49cjewtZ6g0lF5WiMxMRBkNb1xtl5VaOqTGYCXdjC/fnclFDnJzY9JEBnjMrFgR2wwoXX1 RvMtj7hs6BWP4pDbVloUzXD1WRyC+SNiQmKleZci0IZZAtEOXqm6mCgKtRrkJizvIT385G+q mwJM8QfPxRao5T4AYBXHfTX9nwCNeJCO+4kWxLrvI0kz8dd6ermL3F+IctXFuGO5ZxPGwZAB Vq1LjRnPmsOwJ4OqyQDVl7Rf7TflKlDnMYIDXjCCA1oCAQEwcDBpMRMwEQYKCZImiZPyLGQB GRYDb3JnMRgwFgYKCZImiZPyLGQBGRYIRE9FR3JpZHMxIDAeBgNVBAsTF0NlcnRpZmljYXRl IEF1dGhvcml0aWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1ET0VHcmlkcyBDQSAxAgMAoWcwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCC AcMwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTAwMzIwMTYx NTM5WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUiI+5+lN9+PrFyKK0Q+KZ4E8OGrQwXwYJKoZIhvcNAQkP MVIwUDALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3 DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMH8GCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFyMHAwaTETMBEG CgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMIGB BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFyoHAwaTETMBEGCgmSJomT8ixkARkWA29yZzEYMBYGCgmSJomT8ixk ARkWCERPRUdyaWRzMSAwHgYDVQQLExdDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBBdXRob3JpdGllczEWMBQGA1UE AxMNRE9FR3JpZHMgQ0EgMQIDAKFnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAGhxyOWwtrXa+RWMSAbV Yo6oQrttFiwTbMDW5NXJXsvhv7WhXgUrV7PV/ecv3hLQWHLbnFsryKfSPXqrRhzbhHqh01ym PWX6lYCCpoVkPSFSkvEX8XUSB+wN1iAzBDnS/wMNBE83GjIpGE8WFcGX7n6mBNqdyOENEpLw SADygqkncHHw+LpyWKtrWsjKbfRpOklT1kxk3J8X43FEXulSqQBifxF/AIgvthBixtsbd44W vRKrIvBdzlxJ2SQx2V8/AkQJt1MdmZL57aD7sdYAFpb/GLzo1xM/vigHlLCMtCon9eswhM8y 34wAROrjh2EQ62GrM+bVAcZP08UDaBk+JB0AAAAAAAA= --------------ms050308010006070902000402-- From general-return-1232-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 04:09:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22921 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 04:09:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 04:09:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 81849 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 03:06:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81665 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 03:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81657 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 03:06:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.198] (HELO mail-qy0-f198.google.com) (209.85.221.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:06:48 +0000 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so3167603qyk.30 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:06:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.219.143 with SMTP id hu15mr2734223qcb.12.1269227187420; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:06:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aaron Kimball Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:06:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to send KV pair to a reduce task on a particular machine? To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636164079a53f7304825afb91 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636164079a53f7304825afb91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yanfeng, The sort of behavior you want is intentionally omitted from MapReduce's capabilities. Reduce partitions are kept as abstract notions and your MapReduce program cannot bind partitions to particular physical nodes. This is for fault-tolerance purposes. If machine1 crashes, then partition1 can still be rescheduled onto machine3 and the computation can continue. Sorry that's frustrating for your use case! - Aaron On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Yanfeng Zhang wrote: > Hi, all > > The KV pairs (kv1, kv2, kv3 kv4) out from mapper would be partitioned into > R > parts (e.g. R=2) by a partitioner. For example, kv1 and kv2 are in > partition1, while kv3 and kv4 are in partition2, the reducers will get KV > pairs from these two partitions, reducer1 get KV pairs from partition1 and > reducer2 get KV pairs from partition2. > > I want to let machine1 get KV pairs from partition1 and machine2 get KV > pairs from partition2. But reducer1 is not always on machine1, reducer2 is > not always on machine2. Is there any way to make sure kv1 and kv2 are sent > to machine1 and kv3, kv4 are sent to machine2? > > Thank you in advance! > > Sincerely, > -- > Yanfeng Zhang > --001636164079a53f7304825afb91-- From general-return-1233-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 13:32:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66459 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 13:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 13:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 91221 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 13:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91153 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 13:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91145 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 13:32:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5681BA4FA for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YYy6ne1HiOfB for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C0A1BA4E4 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:14 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1269869523.08496@uTyJjD+XQQ8lvCj7gQ7W/g Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2MDVx4c014475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:00 GMT Message-ID: <4BA77159.4090902@apache.org> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:09 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.21 Release References: <656B2F92-03D7-46AB-B49B-C8CBFE2F8BA9@speakeasy.net> <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7c962aed1003191151g18b6efc3m5b89385ade5cc29f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o2MDVx4c014475 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Stack wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis wrote: >> ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. Was >> there a final decision on this off list? >> > > On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for > releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what is in current 0.21 hadoop branch but I > subsequently decided against it after chatting with folks and figuring > that the only group that seemed interested in driving a release of the > hadoop 0.21 branch was the hbase crew. If I were to guess, an hadoop > vouched for by a couple of hbasers with their spotty hdfs and > mapreduce knowledge probably wouldn't have the penetration of a > release backed by, say, a Yahoo. No one would trust their data to > such a release. If no data in hadoop 0.21 clusters, hbase wouldn't > have anything to run against. So I let it go and figured time could > be spent better elsewhere; e.g. helping test the set of patches that > could get us a sync/flush/append on a patched hadoop 0.20 (hdfs-200, > etc.). > > Sorry, I should have added a note to cited thread that I'd wandered... > > St.Ack I'm not going to volunteer to help with this as my changes are still not in 0.22, which is what I'm trying to target, but I'd certainly approve of cutting a release if only because - it ensures the release process itself works well. When we were doing releases every fortnight at work, you make sure everything is automated that can be automated. - with 0.22 adding security, I expect its deployment will be traumatic and take longer to roll out than anyone expects - there are lots of improvements in 0.21; getting into a world of backports is complicated. Better to keep momentum up. The big concern has to be the filesystem. Who out there is willing/able to test 0.21-based filesystems, and what size clusters do they have? -steve From general-return-1234-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 17:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57357 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 5435 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:11:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5378 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5370 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:11:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.192] (HELO mail-px0-f192.google.com) (209.85.216.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:11:52 +0000 Received: by pxi30 with SMTP id 30so3707707pxi.20 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rSH/0+4L+E0VS9xEEeQ8FQJCxq2op2Ogrho/LSDxvDg=; b=XiiiH0HRnzvAXPZr8FInpAMSfyPhiW3eAE5MibmiIXscgMIDxDSf5f7xY5VUXr6suX aBEHp7eHuQJ2ESAzrz6ZpEKsl/mE+ryejX5i9pnkrJmD5+U5tIYgAx90F5tSju/VHYY+ qYrXrQpEjvFoVXnKNXyx9ECSEwobfEfgux3UA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IOK7FUJIuXeIAI4Y/shVBdTao4miMFkaTLE3KkWoACDnkrdfFfgGpDiJAMdenmjpKM uxJjg1ZdpJNVkfqYMAtTquZFkoOVyCytaIKUCvtlj4jsgutTC8KcOxYI/4NllCwnSe8N FoZb9+8XR1geAKKPSrGNi3xmaAaegKPdaKmsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.57.5 with SMTP id f5mr5152697rva.173.1269277891715; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:11:31 -0700 Message-ID: <1eabbac31003221011x468ebbabw5776550bbaf2d9e5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Error: could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b2b0e3db66dc048266c95a --001636b2b0e3db66dc048266c95a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 After upgrading to hadoop-0.20.2, I started seeing these messages in the log: 2010-03-22 09:56:28,393 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 1 on 9000, call addBlock(/home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ jobtracker.info, DFSClient_-1956918169) from 127.0.0.1:41067: error: java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1271) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:422) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) I am running in Psuedo-distributed mode. Before upgrading I used to see these messages occasionally, but they were harmless. Now I see these when I try to copy files to DFS using -copyFromLocal, and the files no longer get copied :( I mean, it's quite possible, this has nothing to do with the Hadoop upgrade but something changed in my environment, but any help will be appreciated. Thanks. --001636b2b0e3db66dc048266c95a-- From general-return-1235-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 17:33:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65906 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 17:33:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 17:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 45567 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45485 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 17:33:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jaybooth@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.174] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.211.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:33:23 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so760577ywh.5 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aI9SVQEfJDvr3JojD8Zn255+8pnSE4UGlWdcGEXhRjc=; b=GKgIj6kmBGZjacefu7H/E8LLbuOsH2HDWs+R8eGUfiJTNunoiBeiwRrcBMn5bRIzdd RhVAOH76Emdz/640MLFWZrVez/Bc9N/ozokH36N6oz9XEt3IyJXyDMcTdVvfrzbQKRIw ThpuPypinz1HdfANavJ4IGSmGh3pEs1YLz8YQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=awHV4vZ4x1f8pgQlewvk4nWFMD0Qcthxkf6VxOXMsY5ptzr98ZO4VW/pVfaF4I/0LR 2r/m3UFSCHam37Pr0kiVGvAXtnLmMU/yiosYw6sxHpWQ8z4bj6vbNxb/03qfU3NDP0PQ aP9AaYWXVoZw6+SRuVDZtaYIftFmaI9rSv0WI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.137.13 with SMTP id p13mr10619684ann.146.1269279180510; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31003221011x468ebbabw5776550bbaf2d9e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31003221011x468ebbabw5776550bbaf2d9e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:33:00 -0400 Message-ID: <54dc3c51003221033i5d9a4299iddb239a03ae7a763@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Error: could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 From: Jay Booth To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68ee28cacd81704826716fc --0016e68ee28cacd81704826716fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Usually when I see this in pseudo-distributed, it means the datanode isn't up. Check logs? On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > After upgrading to hadoop-0.20.2, I started seeing these messages in the > log: > > > 2010-03-22 09:56:28,393 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 1 on 9000, call addBlock(/home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > jobtracker.info, DFSClient_-1956918169) from 127.0.0.1:41067: error: > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 > at > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1271) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:422) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > I am running in Psuedo-distributed mode. Before upgrading I used to see > these messages occasionally, but they were harmless. Now I see these when > I > try to copy files to DFS using -copyFromLocal, and the files no longer get > copied :( > > I mean, it's quite possible, this has nothing to do with the Hadoop upgrade > but something changed in my environment, but any help will be appreciated. > Thanks. > --0016e68ee28cacd81704826716fc-- From general-return-1236-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 17:39:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67853 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 17:39:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 17:39:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 56859 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:39:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56816 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 17:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56808 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 17:39:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:39:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:39:53 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so3903295pwi.35 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:39:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QBiW5XBQPvq12Mzft81tZjzXNIDbXoNoDrDJABuLBbc=; b=uIXcBVs7bzDCwqkBQV7irt7Xqmz5KKhiA82ql7aFBoyTFlEsJSLw8+zh7ZpVs37cxG Hh6zaEQcYlrSQhRd27gNG6kza4AxEy55ItSd/ca+U7YrcbIHquRR74Nf+MvX6WMl0Ot6 QrUaeQJBv05yAHmQ5+7dWHwKTxootVAiBhoGw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eBuQGLymLJMu9MoOdCQ0NztfXgAPqymJ0rs02oPa1eRE0lHPTAL7w9/G/hbFtsiXCe jnL6sMzzK53uxLa2AjRfd4sxfRi4f+FZb0dkPtLftW8rW4RBjqyCM9aBdCiSBr3mPsMW TpUvCarsuS32gxR8bzN+iYeHPRGFOTmH64iJI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.187.9 with SMTP id o9mr4279792rvp.211.1269279573081; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:39:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54dc3c51003221033i5d9a4299iddb239a03ae7a763@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31003221011x468ebbabw5776550bbaf2d9e5@mail.gmail.com> <54dc3c51003221033i5d9a4299iddb239a03ae7a763@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:39:33 -0700 Message-ID: <1eabbac31003221039kda88dd6pcf9e59fcf4d48634@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Error: could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1acf01300dd0482672e8f --000e0cd1acf01300dd0482672e8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Everything in datanode log looks normal to me. Here it is.. Let me know if you see any problem. Thanks. 2010-03-22 09:55:02,578 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode STARTUP_MSG: host = training-vm/127.0.0.1 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-03-22 09:55:18,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Storage directory /home/training/hadoop/dfs/data is not formatted. 2010-03-22 09:55:18,093 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Formatting ... 2010-03-22 09:55:18,527 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Registered FSDatasetStatusMBean 2010-03-22 09:55:18,533 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Opened info server at 50010 2010-03-22 09:55:18,560 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Balancing bandwith is 1048576 bytes/s 2010-03-22 09:55:33,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. Opening the listener on 50075 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: listener.getLocalPort() returned 50075 webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50075 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound to port 50075 2010-03-22 09:55:34,387 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 2010-03-22 09:57:00,445 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50075 2010-03-22 09:57:00,480 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=DataNode, sessionId=null 2010-03-22 09:57:15,652 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=DataNode, port=50020 2010-03-22 09:57:15,676 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server Responder: starting 2010-03-22 09:57:15,713 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server listener on 50020: starting 2010-03-22 09:57:15,738 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 0 on 50020: starting 2010-03-22 09:57:15,766 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 1 on 50020: starting 2010-03-22 09:57:15,836 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: dnRegistration = DatanodeRegistration(localhost:50010, storageID=, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020) 2010-03-22 09:57:15,880 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server handler 2 on 50020: starting 2010-03-22 09:57:15,988 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: New storage id DS-3114065-127.0.0.1-50010-1269277035840 is assigned to data-node 127.0.0.1:50010 2010-03-22 09:57:16,022 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( 127.0.0.1:50010, storageID=DS-3114065-127.0.0.1-50010-1269277035840, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020)In DataNode.run, data = FSDataset{dirpath='/home/training/hadoop/dfs/data/current'} 2010-03-22 09:57:16,032 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: using BLOCKREPORT_INTERVAL of 3600000msec Initial delay: 0msec 2010-03-22 09:57:16,243 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got processed in 16 msecs 2010-03-22 09:57:16,258 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Starting Periodic block scanner. 2010-03-22 10:34:44,492 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got processed in 3 msecs On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > Usually when I see this in pseudo-distributed, it means the datanode isn't > up. Check logs? > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Something Something < > mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > > > After upgrading to hadoop-0.20.2, I started seeing these messages in the > > log: > > > > > > 2010-03-22 09:56:28,393 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > > handler 1 on 9000, call addBlock(/home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > > jobtracker.info, DFSClient_-1956918169) from 127.0.0.1:41067: error: > > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 > > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ > > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1271) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:422) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at > > > > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > > at > > > > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) > > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) > > > > > > I am running in Psuedo-distributed mode. Before upgrading I used to see > > these messages occasionally, but they were harmless. Now I see these > when > > I > > try to copy files to DFS using -copyFromLocal, and the files no longer > get > > copied :( > > > > I mean, it's quite possible, this has nothing to do with the Hadoop > upgrade > > but something changed in my environment, but any help will be > appreciated. > > Thanks. > > > --000e0cd1acf01300dd0482672e8f-- From general-return-1237-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 22 20:58:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36857 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2010 20:58:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2010 20:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2913 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 20:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2780 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2010 20:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2772 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2010 20:58:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:58:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:58:20 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2567861wyf.35 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=X3jqs6qkFBRwWVHu8EW5B9J12YtggAUlg5UbMB4Xiqo=; b=nzwTvIRoSAi8W07htUppCz8K+uNY9gUC8ZajNhTnIjHO9rJwuTyyFu8J6nFGiBBAmZ zjn3Qienx85mAI4PC75KXsPaCicZ7atbXbmFp6gZnfBQpbuRHorJRPVRdHiRj8kSl8S4 4Xr2SXzVDYqRz7h6CwU/A6Z1ABrF5hAA++5Zo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=K0nwBhIrBZWOeDx6f/Og/BjQIMgA24PVX42Nmw2bVA09+uSiPITNEEvGQEhj5L9IDZ QK9D6fIDRIRaTLBPFjkn9RBK6M9OxY1myjgoCtnx39fjMt3y0rAeT1Xh1T9xzvTswUlO aedPsctwyV0xI7kDgkf71zu7M59Wrd2vV0Ao0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.12 with SMTP id x12mr53501wee.185.1269291478924; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31003221039kda88dd6pcf9e59fcf4d48634@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31003221011x468ebbabw5776550bbaf2d9e5@mail.gmail.com> <54dc3c51003221033i5d9a4299iddb239a03ae7a763@mail.gmail.com> <1eabbac31003221039kda88dd6pcf9e59fcf4d48634@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:57:58 -0700 Message-ID: <1eabbac31003221357x2cd5616avfbb687c6e0f03864@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Error: could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7e0a9b7c043048269f3ce --0016e6d7e0a9b7c043048269f3ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Seems like this was a space problem. I deleted bunch of files and now I am able to copy files to DFS. I still see the error message in the log, but it's harmless - I guess! On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > Everything in datanode log looks normal to me. Here it is.. Let me know > if you see any problem. Thanks. > > 2010-03-22 09:55:02,578 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode > STARTUP_MSG: host = training-vm/127.0.0.1 > STARTUP_MSG: args = [] > STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG: build = > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r > 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 2010-03-22 09:55:18,091 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: > Storage directory /home/training/hadoop/dfs/data is not formatted. > 2010-03-22 09:55:18,093 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: > Formatting ... > 2010-03-22 09:55:18,527 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Registered > FSDatasetStatusMBean > 2010-03-22 09:55:18,533 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Opened info server at 50010 > 2010-03-22 09:55:18,560 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Balancing bandwith is > 1048576 bytes/s > 2010-03-22 09:55:33,986 INFO org.mortbay.log: Logging to > org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter(org.mortbay.log) via > org.mortbay.log.Slf4jLog > 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Port > returned by webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() before open() is -1. > Opening the listener on 50075 > 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: > listener.getLocalPort() returned 50075 > webServer.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() returned 50075 > 2010-03-22 09:55:34,386 INFO org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer: Jetty bound > to port 50075 > 2010-03-22 09:55:34,387 INFO org.mortbay.log: jetty-6.1.14 > 2010-03-22 09:57:00,445 INFO org.mortbay.log: Started > SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:50075 > 2010-03-22 09:57:00,480 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: > Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=DataNode, sessionId=null > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,652 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: > Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=DataNode, port=50020 > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,676 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > Responder: starting > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,713 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > listener on 50020: starting > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,738 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 0 on 50020: starting > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,766 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 1 on 50020: starting > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,836 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: dnRegistration = > DatanodeRegistration(localhost:50010, storageID=, infoPort=50075, > ipcPort=50020) > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,880 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server > handler 2 on 50020: starting > 2010-03-22 09:57:15,988 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: New storage id > DS-3114065-127.0.0.1-50010-1269277035840 is assigned to data-node > 127.0.0.1:50010 > 2010-03-22 09:57:16,022 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration( > 127.0.0.1:50010, storageID=DS-3114065-127.0.0.1-50010-1269277035840, > infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020)In DataNode.run, data = > FSDataset{dirpath='/home/training/hadoop/dfs/data/current'} > 2010-03-22 09:57:16,032 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: using BLOCKREPORT_INTERVAL > of 3600000msec Initial delay: 0msec > 2010-03-22 09:57:16,243 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got > processed in 16 msecs > 2010-03-22 09:57:16,258 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: Starting Periodic block > scanner. > 2010-03-22 10:34:44,492 INFO > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: BlockReport of 0 blocks got > processed in 3 msecs > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Jay Booth wrote: > >> Usually when I see this in pseudo-distributed, it means the datanode isn't >> up. Check logs? >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Something Something < >> mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > After upgrading to hadoop-0.20.2, I started seeing these messages in the >> > log: >> > >> > >> > 2010-03-22 09:56:28,393 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: IPC Server >> > handler 1 on 9000, call addBlock(/home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ >> > jobtracker.info, DFSClient_-1956918169) from 127.0.0.1:41067: error: >> > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ >> > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 >> > java.io.IOException: File /home/training/hadoop/mapred/system/ >> > jobtracker.info could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1 >> > at >> > >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.getAdditionalBlock(FSNamesystem.java:1271) >> > at >> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.addBlock(NameNode.java:422) >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >> > at >> > >> > >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) >> > at >> > >> > >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) >> > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) >> > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) >> > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) >> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >> > at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) >> > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) >> > >> > >> > I am running in Psuedo-distributed mode. Before upgrading I used to see >> > these messages occasionally, but they were harmless. Now I see these >> when >> > I >> > try to copy files to DFS using -copyFromLocal, and the files no longer >> get >> > copied :( >> > >> > I mean, it's quite possible, this has nothing to do with the Hadoop >> upgrade >> > but something changed in my environment, but any help will be >> appreciated. >> > Thanks. >> > >> > > --0016e6d7e0a9b7c043048269f3ce-- From general-return-1238-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 23 19:19:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30415 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2010 19:19:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2010 19:19:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6459 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:19:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6397 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6389 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2010 19:19:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:19:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.166] (HELO web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.166) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:19:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 69771 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 19:19:23 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1269371963; bh=uhAEk15QSAAvZsZj5jO2y9IujJm7035trmRafi+7jBI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ayeDIPkL1mNcYThcpyYUMdo7oAo4CKUHJhibTHmtDKjN5Z2IOK0AzCTX46VmFqSYijtyoX1LgUvQxnpEGN11yKk5yMGjf76aq57MhCnbZia6LclXBE2s1/arfKKgXpZ6zZUJx4uZu2mckz4EDJ4TqWGBaz3P/hA1phjX29kwN6U= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xJkrLoBEcVX6xlA0Gi3g4qhTtejodmWPEbVpUURv9YBdfW6GrH8wVQvpKc+McsHGj0DWpr0mQ8kfTlkz7Ivw0vpEduqfALSMEfC2d5pPkS7ASQcA50L7iO900pRvczA+A3icz552o4+1pSD2XcwseXG4/hSxFm6+vuk72mwsr1M=; Message-ID: <169646.69593.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: iBvx_z4VM1nPe16uCpNMMPn42YpQuRASSvVxjUkH39ttoTK q1OdyfUtk7f3Y4ZHGnZkPWgL2IPAf34ktzDtAjhyZ7VG7gQaXCe9czIPqZVJ MpaTDlzZoO3IASZGtglxyjAvQsv7HvxDxyJDs5e0GCG_w32_0MUXbZiLIPPm Rc0KAaKub5txpfsxTpMiwTFX28eFAUbqCb78SugoVNd7_VKgr99OgDV9ON7g DURKQwvSCTbwM9bM6f8OTjSMVEGHooJLRVx3CpIKuu9w9IISIaV53PdJgXSG BWppFmwFgQdqFFXJ_KfVGuf3C7fTX5jlQEuxKR7Gs1zqhBj.UOgkcENVDFrI jkOyIwlk2e3IxDBXIrevOkr1phMhGwNA- Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:19:23 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Yang Subject: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument To: general@hadoop.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All, I got exception below. I followed the Quick Start for the Pseudo-Distributed Operation. I did what the quick start says. Can someone help? cat conf/core-site.xml fs.default.name hdfs://localhost:9000 cat conf/hdfs-site.xml dfs.replication 1 cat conf/mapred-site.xml mapred.job.tracker localhost:9001 Below are errors: -bash-3.2# bin/hadoop namenode -format 10/03/23 11:54:54 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = Board2/192.168.0.185 STARTUP_MSG: args = [-format] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=root,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO common.Storage: java.io.IOException: Invalid argument at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Storage.java:527) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storage.java:505) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:948) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) 10/03/23 11:54:56 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Invalid argument at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Storage.java:527) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storage.java:505) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:948) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at Board2/192.168.0.185 ************************************************************/ Thanks, Gary From general-return-1239-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 23 19:28:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58985 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2010 19:28:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2010 19:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 22656 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:28:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22605 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22596 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2010 19:28:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:28:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:28:31 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o2NJRokY024185 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:27:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=NJBCdbANdAMasvfi3c/TZWNEKCn9gbWV1ibcYmFs5hCoZMn4LOY1TejcMedfNntn Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:27:50 -0700 From: Suresh Srinivas To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:27:49 -0700 Subject: Re: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument Thread-Topic: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument Thread-Index: AcrKvgDea/jHWfWmSGmnbpuw7TcPUAAAOrOb Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <169646.69593.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7CE64442067Fsureshmsyahooinccom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C7CE64442067Fsureshmsyahooinccom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is namenode running when you tried this operation? If so shutdown the namen= ode process and try it again. On 3/23/10 11:19 AM, "Gary Yang" wrote: Hi All, I got exception below. I followed the Quick Start for the Pseudo-Distribute= d Operation. I did what the quick start says. Can someone help? cat conf/core-site.xml fs.default.name hdfs://localhost:9000 cat conf/hdfs-site.xml dfs.replication 1 cat conf/mapred-site.xml mapred.job.tracker localhost:9001 Below are errors: -bash-3.2# bin/hadoop namenode -format 10/03/23 11:54:54 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host =3D Board2/192.168.0.185 STARTUP_MSG: args =3D [-format] STARTUP_MSG: version =3D 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/bra= nches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 U= TC 2010 ************************************************************/ 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=3Droot,root,bin,daemo= n,sys,adm,disk,wheel 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=3Dsupergroup 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO common.Storage: java.io.IOException: Invalid argumen= t at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tr= yLock(Storage.java:527) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lo= ck(Storage.java:505) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.ja= va:1087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.ja= va:1110) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.= java:856) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(N= ameNode.java:948) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.ja= va:965) 10/03/23 11:54:56 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.io.IOException: Invalid arg= ument at sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) at java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tr= yLock(Storage.java:527) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lo= ck(Storage.java:505) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.ja= va:1087) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.ja= va:1110) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.= java:856) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(N= ameNode.java:948) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.ja= va:965) 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at Board2/192.168.0.185 ************************************************************/ Thanks, Gary --_000_C7CE64442067Fsureshmsyahooinccom_-- From general-return-1240-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 23 19:41:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64393 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2010 19:41:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2010 19:41:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 40403 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:41:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40363 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2010 19:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40355 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2010 19:41:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.91.167] (HELO web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.91.167) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:41:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 59209 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Mar 2010 19:40:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1269373258; bh=VRVz8i2WiOvFq1nfArXndSG6opnk3TM/bw8aD9xqsn8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=y2EpSjxnWtHRSBMrSzk8HwzQysJqCjvxPr4LIZWCvqgbz12R3JHCfwJ/AZrRERtMdGAFh+f7lHH4tRYtllWodZlLo3eYUpE15w0LtWkfZ2OsNUd9uKwPlqVDXNzLBarNzSUiguvB5tDl7N4ujxnjowdSAPS6ALzgAqWZjV/DUE0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GEGKTpwAq5mZxEHnEKYTOhlhHgMS3SubHjUsacQDAgLUlvpR0XEYKr0Oeaia3ENIQu08pOz/td5I6GP4UBsIAabymUWON+IBcFreewQU5L46cpfdyX5DFPZ9JqVMV6RWAtuU5VOfN5WsoYdTTJ2gQJ7xKZOVnkPQyPc9HHwftDs=; Message-ID: <424193.53878.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hV5rU_YVM1l9glrHaOvY2ncvstreZybMawQkCEJ6l2cJuZF 3QySnzmP1_D3W7Tghe4XTc5gq3XATipYpuwpXyUsCf.9E4MHjHqC1XS2wwgW LfoyM0YvwATcnx5lAtn5m1OpB5Ob5tq_WUIIbHLA7DyXx48yJ44NW5nl_Tz7 0DQ2bPiGeCNIGAj2aYPnD2UnNEYcxpHpbm5tc7briaViNba2jqrtnmBPky91 aP6lvX_KoIbIwrmSECcN_XTkcXJ6hhZk.NU3Kl2F2JA.zdBvTbXyDI_rGBqq xdFuywFaIpOkXEw71So7eSmbZiAqqPId1fpQOFfZoCQLFd98cUUzo_8sRWNa TVB9O6jfkNE.6Ya_dMHM7pvNErFHHlbU- Received: from [63.147.59.14] by web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:40:58 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/10.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:40:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Yang Subject: Re: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No. The namenode is not running. "bin/hadoop namenode -format" was the very= first command. I have not got chance to start the namenode yet. Any idea? --- On Tue, 3/23/10, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > From: Suresh Srinivas > Subject: Re: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid ar= gument > To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" > Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010, 12:27 PM > Is namenode running when you tried > this operation? If so shutdown the namenode process and try > it again. >=20 >=20 > On 3/23/10 11:19 AM, "Gary Yang" > wrote: >=20 > Hi All, >=20 > I got exception below. I followed the Quick Start for the > Pseudo-Distributed Operation. I did what the quick start > says. Can someone help? >=20 > cat conf/core-site.xml > > href=3D"configuration.xsl"?> >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > =A0 > =A0 =A0 fs.default.name > =A0 =A0 > hdfs://localhost:9000 > =A0 >=20 > >=20 >=20 > cat conf/hdfs-site.xml > > href=3D"configuration.xsl"?> >=20 > >=20 > > =A0 > =A0 =A0 dfs.replication > =A0 =A0 1 > =A0 > >=20 >=20 > cat conf/mapred-site.xml > > href=3D"configuration.xsl"?> >=20 > >=20 > > =A0 > =A0 =A0 mapred.job.tracker > =A0 =A0 localhost:9001 > =A0 > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Below are errors: >=20 >=20 > -bash-3.2# bin/hadoop namenode -format > 10/03/23 11:54:54 INFO namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: > /************************************************************ > STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0host =3D Board2/192.168.0.185 > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0args =3D [-format] > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0version =3D 0.20.2 > STARTUP_MSG:=A0=A0=A0build =3D https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/co= mmon/branches/branch-0.20 > -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC > 2010 > ************************************************************/ > 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: > fsOwner=3Droot,root,bin,daemon,sys,adm,disk,wheel > 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: > supergroup=3Dsupergroup > 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.FSNamesystem: > isPermissionEnabled=3Dtrue > 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO common.Storage: java.io.IOException: > Invalid argument > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Sto= rage.java:527) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storag= e.java:505) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:948) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) >=20 > 10/03/23 11:54:56 ERROR namenode.NameNode: > java.io.IOException: Invalid argument > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Sto= rage.java:527) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storag= e.java:505) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.j= ava:948) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) >=20 > 10/03/23 11:54:56 INFO namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > /************************************************************ > SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at > Board2/192.168.0.185 > ************************************************************/ >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Gary >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > =0A=0A=0A From general-return-1241-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 24 10:17:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91861 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 10:17:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 10:17:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 52458 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 10:17:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52309 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 10:17:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52301 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2010 10:17:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DF0B7E49 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:18 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xA0wQuynL5GC for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B1EB7E0B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:17 +0000 (GMT) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1270030625.41948@4z9RTqmw+yCmC+vetAZ9fQ Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2OAH3oN007750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:05 GMT Message-ID: <4BA9E6AA.0@apache.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:17:14 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument References: <424193.53878.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <424193.53878.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o2OAH3oN007750 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org Gary Yang wrote: > No. The namenode is not running. "bin/hadoop namenode -format" was the very first command. I have not got chance to start the namenode yet. Any idea? >> >> 10/03/23 11:54:56 ERROR namenode.NameNode: >> java.io.IOException: Invalid argument >> at >> sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) >> at >> java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Storage.java:527) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storage.java:505) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:948) >> at >> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) That could be the filesystem being unhappy about some directory Check all your namenode dir settings, make sure they are valid paths, try to create them as the hadoop user From general-return-1242-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 24 16:01:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68765 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 16:01:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 16:01:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3251 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 16:01:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3050 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 16:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57955 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2010 13:26:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of madhusona@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=tSDqHOo4E+Fpq/JsU+G+ZYc8aMsA6EABP3kNwHetgIk=; b=DSDqdZTws46zdzhW4qMwDgNK70SrvWThpxiAtNSKHgntKDChnVu0NQNNqeO0SgbB4P Ip+SF0Ik8vGODo20plRd/WrKNUGTx0gildUjcqqT2SY/jQY8t0eZhfzUzmz+3WHiPd65 1rkX9R5vpaiJEbeoNFBRNot5M76Br5kzc5vj8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sSMjB6ubYdehf/xRQaJ2hzyTWv4L0LehuT6qIrEI5w3t5TQPBu5Zy224ONkeMk6lXw FXl1gJcBVXmnsNWAlvRSjQyyURZT3uHof5HF4TJncH0oO5jm48BkNDxg4l+Hv05Job8u Z/lhKA952Tv2yRBStN26cp+Dmt2nSWtcY3CTk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:26:17 +0100 Message-ID: <975b93dd1003230626y77808d60xdcb26c5682f82a7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Difference From: madhusona@gmail.com To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649849a2bb07b048277c247 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e649849a2bb07b048277c247 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear Users I want to know the difference between Hadoop and clusters(Torque,SGE) -- with regards, B.Madusudhanan, Research Fellow. --0016e649849a2bb07b048277c247-- From general-return-1243-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 24 16:05:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70575 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 16:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 16:05:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14413 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 16:05:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14338 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 16:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14330 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2010 16:05:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:05:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [67.59.59.114] (HELO trironport1.altair.com) (67.59.59.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:05:26 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,301,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="10563234" Received: from unknown (HELO TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com) ([204.235.24.175]) by trironport1.altair.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2010 12:04:54 -0400 Received: from TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) by TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com ([204.235.24.175]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:05:16 -0400 From: Lori Ann Martin To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:04:19 -0400 Subject: RE: Difference Thread-Topic: Difference Thread-Index: AcrLa1VI7fYwZKSnSaWOA8a/Lowl6gAAFPaI Message-ID: <7232A3A7C53F634B8E91E65BC7833C5112D59A2BD8@TR-EXCH07.prog.altair.com> References: <975b93dd1003230626y77808d60xdcb26c5682f82a7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <975b93dd1003230626y77808d60xdcb26c5682f82a7@mail.gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would suggest taking a look at PBS Works by Altair. www.pbsworks.com. Y= ou can go to the website and download a temp key. What will you use the WLM for specifically? ________________________________________ From: madhusona@gmail.com [madhusona@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:26 AM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Difference Dear Users I want to know the difference between Hadoop and clusters(Torque,SGE) -- with regards, B.Madusudhanan, Research Fellow.= From general-return-1244-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 24 18:14:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33417 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 18:14:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 18:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 18156 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 18:14:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18115 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 18:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18107 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2010 18:14:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:14:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:13:54 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.72.185.127]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o2OID5Qk058868 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BAA5631.5090202@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:13:05 -0700 From: Konstantin Shvachko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: bin/hadoop namenode -format IOException: Invalid argument References: <424193.53878.qm@web37905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4BA9E6AA.0@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4BA9E6AA.0@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This may be a problem with the underlying local file system. Some file systems just don't support locks. Some NFS, e.g. Some may have buggy native java implementation. Are your name-node directories in /tmp, which is the default? /tmp can behave strangely. You should set "dfs.name.dir" pointing to a local HD directory in hdfs-site.xml. --Konstantin On 3/24/2010 3:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Gary Yang wrote: >> No. The namenode is not running. "bin/hadoop namenode -format" was the >> very first command. I have not got chance to start the namenode yet. >> Any idea? > >>> >>> 10/03/23 11:54:56 ERROR namenode.NameNode: >>> java.io.IOException: Invalid argument >>> at >>> sun.nio.ch.FileChannelImpl.tryLock(FileChannelImpl.java:900) >>> at >>> java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock(FileChannel.java:974) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.tryLock(Storage.java:527) >>> >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storage.java:505) >>> >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1087) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.format(FSImage.java:1110) >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:856) >>> >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:948) >>> >>> at >>> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:965) > > > That could be the filesystem being unhappy about some directory > > Check all your namenode dir settings, make sure they are valid paths, > try to create them as the hadoop user From general-return-1245-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 03:59:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18740 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 03:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 03:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 13857 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 03:59:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13720 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 03:59:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13705 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 03:59:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:59:35 +0000 Received: from sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [216.252.116.137]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id o2P3wMCa050612; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:acceptlanguage:content-type:mime-version; b=O+qbQhJoL7VnwVzQ1521hHjD+BpdmQEzfsUeYLMx9kVGAVxmF1E943BmX/c2RK/+ Received: from SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.139]) by sp1-ex07cas01.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.252.116.137]) with mapi; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:58:22 -0700 From: Dekel Tankel To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-user@hadoop.apache.org" Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:58:21 -0700 Subject: Hadoop Summit 2010 - June 29th, Santa Clara - Registration and call of papers is now open! Thread-Topic: Hadoop Summit 2010 - June 29th, Santa Clara - Registration and call of papers is now open! Thread-Index: AcrLz2jgF/z5hhfGSFy7H/+BpV0+EA== Message-ID: <46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE03CC34F@SP1-EX07VS01.ds.corp.yahoo.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE03CC34FSP1EX07VS01ds_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE03CC34FSP1EX07VS01ds_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All Yahoo! is proud to host the 3rd Annual Hadoop Summit - June 29th, Santa Cla= ra, California Registration and call for papers are now open at - http://www.hadoopsummit= .org Attend keynotes by technology leaders from Yahoo!, Amazon Web Services, Clo= udera and Facebook, to hear exciting announcements on new capabilities and = applications using Hadoop. We are introducing three track sessions: *Developers - Presentations and discussions about Hadoop programming and be= st practices. *Applications - Case studies about exciting new deployments and innovative = applications. *Research - Discussions on cutting-edge research based on Hadoop technology= . Get an opportunity to share your experience with hundreds of Hadoop users b= y submitting a session abstract for one of the tracks above. Submission de= adline - April 30th. Register early, space is limited! Looking forward to see you at the summit. Dekel --_000_46E2672895E8744A97D7577A6110858B4FE03CC34FSP1EX07VS01ds_-- From general-return-1247-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 14:01:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32107 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 14:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 14:01:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 15357 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 12:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15036 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 12:12:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15012 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 12:12:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:12:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:12:05 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NulrA-0006Zl-Om; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:08:12 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANN] Hadoop 0.20.2 in Debian unstable Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:11:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003251311.40203.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, hadoop has entered Debian unstable a few days ago: http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hadoop.html Please use it, test it, spread the word about it! Having Hadoop in a major linux distribution can significantly improve the visibility and lower the entry barrier. There are still some TODO items to improve the packaging: - build more contribs - build the C++ nativ libraries - build the C bindings - build KFS and Amazon Filesystem bindings More informations on the Debian Wiki page for Hadoop: http://wiki.debian.org/Hadoop Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1248-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 15:01:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92585 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 15:01:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 15:01:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 85695 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 15:01:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85631 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 15:01:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85623 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 15:01:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:01:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:01:15 +0000 Received: from pflip (pflip.crs4.it [156.148.70.62]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 731556BBA0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:59:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by pflip (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:00:53 +0100 Subject: SGE hod support wiki From: Gianluigi Zanetti Reply-To: gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: CRS4 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:00:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1269529253.18834.195.camel@pflip> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Greetings. Some time ago we submitted a patch for HOD that adds Sun Grid Engine integration (I believe it was HADOOP-6369). It appears that this patch is now used in production in more than one site, and we start to have the need to manage its documentation and bug fixes/extensions in an 'externally' visible way. The first idea would be to open a hod-sge specific project on, say, sourceforge. Would this be considered proper form? --gianluigi From general-return-1246-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 15:14:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46936 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 15:14:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 15:14:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 44327 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 09:43:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44103 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 09:43:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44067 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 09:43:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:43:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:43:06 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NujWz-0004fQ-6f; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:39:13 +0100 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, katta-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, solr-dev@lucene.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: ported lucandra: lucene index on HBase Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:42:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201003251042.17623.thomas@koch.ro> Hi, Lucandra stores a lucene index on cassandra: http://blog.sematext.com/2010/02/09/lucandra-a-cassandra-based-lucene-backe= nd As the author of lucandra writes: "I=E2=80=99m sure something similar could= be built=20 on hbase." So here it is: http://github.com/thkoch2001/lucehbase This is only a first prototype which has not been tested on anything real y= et.=20 But if you're interested, please join me to get it production ready! I propose to keep this thread on hbase-user and java-dev only. Would it make sense to aim this project to become an hbase contrib? Or a=20 lucene contrib? Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1249-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 17:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27827 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 17:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 17:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 14093 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 17:10:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14010 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 17:10:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13994 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 17:10:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:10:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jdcryans@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.198] (HELO mail-iw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.223.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:10:44 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1136343iwn.29 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PyIbQzt9uQQidjEEr1Eo/u1NwzCOR/5wGAQxAV8c5vI=; b=e+yNQD9feo6ftCwguygkTQ2ElJmHB5C8xDCLhGv3jJWni3ssqcrSVotfJiNasVTCag PNL4Zp5Wk7L2NR4o23V8pfAoMCwx0VezynXBwO6mChUve1goLRs3erijFRgqOZfy8tnh hokNGEUAuuxn33Pdti26y/+3hsa+GDD/Yik3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=CdJStQrAzEhpqH9xTVFuVCHb/hAfDc1NYmwIa3SVI3Oagv4ytFaa4xU5UrYixvkIo/ 2gUJg8aT1R3CVjLxz6ZtZyozTxk5bxMby27qrenFtuvOgd6BMIOMt2vh2fJOraoBFfGl i00jYNIrtbN2LFe64FwHYKWh3+E3nXlXGGA4g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jdcryans@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.6.7 with SMTP id 7mr3765558waf.90.1269537022936; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003251042.17623.thomas@koch.ro> References: <201003251042.17623.thomas@koch.ro> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:10:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 51e6ca9125b87e29 Message-ID: <31a243e71003251010o53c804f2gd7b4318fd2eb0012@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: ported lucandra: lucene index on HBase From: Jean-Daniel Cryans To: general@hadoop.apache.org, thomas@koch.ro Cc: java-dev@lucene.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org, katta-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That sounds great Thomas! You can start by adding an entry here http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/SupportingProjects WRT becoming an HBase contrib, we have a rule that at least one committer (or a very active contributor) must be in charge and be available to fix anything broken in it due to changes in core HBase. For example, if a contrib doesn't compile before a release, we will exclude it. J-D On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > Lucandra stores a lucene index on cassandra: > http://blog.sematext.com/2010/02/09/lucandra-a-cassandra-based-lucene-bac= kend > > As the author of lucandra writes: "I=92m sure something similar could be = built > on hbase." > > So here it is: > http://github.com/thkoch2001/lucehbase > > This is only a first prototype which has not been tested on anything real= yet. > But if you're interested, please join me to get it production ready! > > I propose to keep this thread on hbase-user and java-dev only. > Would it make sense to aim this project to become an hbase contrib? Or a > lucene contrib? > > Best regards, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro > From general-return-1250-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 17:38:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53791 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 17:38:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 17:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 63253 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 17:37:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63209 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 17:37:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63201 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 17:37:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:37:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:37:53 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=BM/tZyb893klu0e2cpVJ4p/LVODvCUmQZ9zz7/Og7lqp2uRMKt9NI/VI r9czKP9m8cP4pbfE3/NBR0AoWpbPwURwky/VzJR9BIMYTyMrN0xezyOpf BAuO2Wjuf/5BwMY; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1269538673; x=1301074673; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20Re:=20SGE=20hod=20support=20wiki|Date:=20Thu, =2025=20Mar=202010=2017:37:31=20+0000|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"general@hadoop .apache.org"=20,=0D=0A=09"gian luigi.zanetti@crs4.it"=20 |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<60debeb4-9ad7-4863-9967-d6ceb715 e112>|In-Reply-To:=20<1269529253.18834.195.camel@pflip>; bh=QT3cAItv3UhwbRwMDcR7gQxD+/lA/tEjWrM+CJqpLF8=; b=UYwuIXCuHVVOJRek8yWYF5x3fi5kuxOOFRQyFEJu/jg+LwAYgncRz1h2 mJ74oMqI1RmM+1DzP6OiKlp+qbkjLJ9C288oZfO4bnugawD/pv2SXMXdm eR10vlhU64opHDL; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,308,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="11936562" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:37:31 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS01.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.140) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:37:31 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas01.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.140]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:37:31 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" , "gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it" Subject: Re: SGE hod support wiki Thread-Topic: SGE hod support wiki Thread-Index: AQHKzCwKxq0iSY8KikC4ErkuF4Vid5IC61iA Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:37:31 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1269529253.18834.195.camel@pflip> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <60debeb4-9ad7-4863-9967-d6ceb715e112> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2010 17:37:31.0791 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8EE31F0:01CACC41] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/25/10 8:00 AM, "Gianluigi Zanetti" wrote: > Greetings. > Some time ago we submitted a patch for HOD that adds Sun Grid Engine > integration (I believe it was HADOOP-6369). It appears that this patch > is now used in production in more than one site, and we start to have > the need to manage its documentation and bug fixes/extensions in an > 'externally' visible way. > The first idea would be to open a hod-sge specific project on, say, > sourceforge. Would this be considered proper form? Why not use the hadoop wiki and just use apache jira? It would be better i= f hod was modified to handle more than torque in the mainline tree than have = a custom patch floating around. Obviously, if there are legal reasons (see the LZO stuff), then that's a different story. From general-return-1251-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 25 18:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78927 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 18:17:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 18:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 47298 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 18:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47145 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 18:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47137 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 18:17:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:17:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.148.72.33] (HELO raffaello.crs4.it) (156.148.72.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:17:11 +0000 Received: from pflip (pflip.crs4.it [156.148.70.62]) by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 59DA36BBA6 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:15:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by pflip (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:16:50 +0100 Subject: Re: SGE hod support wiki From: Gianluigi Zanetti Reply-To: gianluigi.zanetti@crs4.it To: general@hadoop.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: CRS4 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:16:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1269541010.18834.343.camel@pflip> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To tell the truth, we already have a patch sent in (HADOOP-6369). On the other hand, silly of me, I did not consider the hadoop wiki itself. --gianluigi On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 17:37 +0000, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > On 3/25/10 8:00 AM, "Gianluigi Zanetti" wrote: > > > Greetings. > > Some time ago we submitted a patch for HOD that adds Sun Grid Engine > > integration (I believe it was HADOOP-6369). It appears that this patch > > is now used in production in more than one site, and we start to have > > the need to manage its documentation and bug fixes/extensions in an > > 'externally' visible way. > > The first idea would be to open a hod-sge specific project on, say, > > sourceforge. Would this be considered proper form? > > Why not use the hadoop wiki and just use apache jira? It would be better if > hod was modified to handle more than torque in the mainline tree than have a > custom patch floating around. Obviously, if there are legal reasons (see > the LZO stuff), then that's a different story. > From general-return-1252-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 26 23:55:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17195 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 23:55:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 23:55:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6425 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 23:55:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6016 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 23:55:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5814 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2010 23:55:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:55:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.172] (HELO mrout2.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:55:38 +0000 Received: from [10.73.135.250] ([10.73.135.250]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id o2QNsrZq091353; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BAD494E.9010900@apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:54:54 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3.0. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. Key features of the 3.3.0 release: * observers - non-voting members of the ensemble, scale reads http://bit.ly/9wPnpq * distributed queue recipe implementation (c/java) * additional 4letterword/jmx features to support operations * maven repository support * build support for eclipse project generation * ivy based build Changes in contrib: * zookeeper-tree: export/import znode namespace * zooinspector: gui browser for znode namespace * bookkeeper client rewrite, use of netty For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.3.0 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.3.0/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-1253-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 27 02:40:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64362 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2010 02:40:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9601 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9365 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36397 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 14:31:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) From: Isabel Drost Reply-To: isabel@apache.org To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Hadoop 0.20.2 in Debian unstable Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:31:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-3-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thomas Koch , general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org References: <201003251311.40203.thomas@koch.ro> In-Reply-To: <201003251311.40203.thomas@koch.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6077567.SjRRpaTRjs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003251531.06621.isabel@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --nextPart6077567.SjRRpaTRjs Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 25.03.2010 Thomas Koch wrote: > hadoop has entered Debian unstable a few days ago: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hadoop.html Congratulations! Isabel --nextPart6077567.SjRRpaTRjs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkurc6oACgkQPJpCBAwIhbSwvACgjO8iIfb5iyUW0hGGZTOgy5ST 1/gAoIrbDBbFy+if2ReiVcR9Md3BmIJu =1dte -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6077567.SjRRpaTRjs-- From general-return-1254-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 27 02:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64436 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2010 02:40:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 10353 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10322 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2010 02:40:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1974 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2010 23:51:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.145.54.171 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of phunt@yahoo-inc.com) Message-ID: <4BAD4859.9010809@yahoo-inc.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:50:49 -0700 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announce@apache.org, "zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" , general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3.0. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you don't have to write them from scratch. You can use it off-the-shelf to implement consensus, group management, leader election, and presence protocols. And you can build on it for your own, specific needs. Key features of the 3.3.0 release: * observers - non-voting members of the ensemble, scale reads http://bit.ly/9wPnpq * distributed queue recipe implementation (c/java) * additional 4letterword/jmx features to support operations * maven repository support * build support for eclipse project generation * ivy based build Changes in contrib: * zookeeper-tree: export/import znode namespace * zooinspector: gui browser for znode namespace * bookkeeper client rewrite, use of netty For ZooKeeper release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/releases.html ZooKeeper 3.3.0 Release Notes are at: http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.3.0/releasenotes.html Regards, The ZooKeeper Team From general-return-1255-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 28 19:10:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8775 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Mar 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16959 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2010 19:10:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16854 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2010 19:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16839 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2010 19:10:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:10:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mailinglists19@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:10:44 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so2513233wwi.35 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HgoF2zmXsF9tXWKZmXYe8I2uZqJyfYnjflGb0WlIjDc=; b=Safb2Enc1jrMq2CQnnTrOJ2Kk6eusJs7YFMCtcumJ+/bLmeFoO2rsuA2mpGiixJxBD z+nJdRmC+xHEXhahR5UHa3AWQv9FAKOmabe+rqpu+RKmGb0ypF8LqM3O++Q/ZTIJy00r 4cOZkuCBrBdgsQm+ItOq49UDS9csFsf6BSeec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j9GymAfCVFCxTl7GnCLM1hVg2yNcFW7KNgq0lN5ffIv8j5c58rWdsBuHcsmcL87SNY 8+GHswOb8EPOI9LRQTc6P0W/vmuq3CFN6HLrK/LagkEFV6UerqjJXwotlcMNWijtfan3 eBBdftSMIthA9HeLyJH/O37f4Tzmu08urp6Lg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.27.72 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:10:23 -0700 Received: by 10.216.85.19 with SMTP id t19mr2430773wee.107.1269803423127; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1eabbac31003281210xd5ad959v313ac785bf6fb7b1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Improving performance of Hadoop job From: Something Something To: general@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab6f5f85c6d0482e125f7 --0016e6dab6f5f85c6d0482e125f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When I run a Hadoop job in a command shell it runs in 21 secs, but when I run the same from within Eclipse IDE it runs in 1 second! Trying to figure out what the reason is. The output is shown below: 1) It appears the FILE_BYTES_READ, HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN etc values are totally different. Sounds like that's what is causing the performance degradation. 2) I tried setting -Xmx1000m in the command shell but that doesn't help. Are there other JVM arguments that affect values of these variables (FILE_BYTES_READ etc)? Any hints would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks. *Command Shell log:* INFO: Starting top scores writing job.... 10/03/28 11:19:49 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 10/03/28 11:19:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201003281008_0006 10/03/28 11:19:51 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% 10/03/28 11:19:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% 10/03/28 11:20:04 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 100% 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_201003281008_0006 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 16 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=1 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters *10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_READ=1736 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=3504 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN=3706 *10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input groups=87 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=0 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=100 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce shuffle bytes=0 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce output records=100 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=200 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=1530 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=0 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=100 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input records=100 *Total time for writing scores: 21 secs.* *Eclipse console log:* INFO: Starting top scores writing job.... 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=JobTracker, sessionId= - already initialized 10/03/28 11:29:15 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. 10/03/28 11:29:15 WARN mapred.JobClient: No job jar file set. User classes may not be found. See JobConf(Class) or JobConf#setJar(String). 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0006 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: Finished spill 0 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task:attempt_local_0006_m_000000_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task 'attempt_local_0006_m_000000_0' done. 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.Merger: Merging 1 sorted segments 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.Merger: Down to the last merge-pass, with 1 segments left of total size: 1732 bytes 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task:attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0 is done. And is in the process of commiting 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0 is allowed to commit now 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO output.FileOutputCommitter: Saved output of task 'attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0' to markers/results 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: reduce > reduce 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task 'attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0' done. 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 100% 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_local_0006 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 14 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters *10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_READ=95848 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=277286 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=304886 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN=209112 *10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input groups=87 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=0 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=100 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce shuffle bytes=0 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce output records=100 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=200 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=1530 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=0 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=100 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input records=100 *Total time for writing scores: 1 secs. * --0016e6dab6f5f85c6d0482e125f7-- From general-return-1256-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 28 23:39:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64102 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2010 23:39:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Mar 2010 23:39:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 2090 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2010 23:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1835 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2010 23:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1821 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2010 23:39:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vermaabhishekp@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:38:55 +0000 Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so5431150gyd.35 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qm0qI/fwtD63/9QjpNgHc1wdHJps8MLzDxWoSoRCKCA=; b=x43lp5HQDKW9bArDkFd/B2Lec7HWGyPfCV7NHM2wTR5Mr29YJnjrHGx24RT2k/BGUr JeZuBNEOWNS+NG/nS7dI5Ws67M28oMn1TdXNrde3CkZL4nuGa2GA07wtg+aBsKe04r82 /9+rzCgzfD7zDh4qE6P3soiTe3SpJ261ZpIHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QCgEvAVlkjUR3rfOCpiqX9nvjsVbmR0aCK7qxBjtcPB3yvhI0Irsv9agdWHTy7sGnB fpEcXwMI0IF5BpVlnB4tM8MOf2ocLlzyjeA4vT53Ku4YKAV+v8LDAIYT0IEDGGMZX35V slvIfDKp0QLclxl/IB530K83kXGP5CKXNqpDA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.79.16 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1eabbac31003281210xd5ad959v313ac785bf6fb7b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1eabbac31003281210xd5ad959v313ac785bf6fb7b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:38:34 -0500 Received: by 10.150.117.26 with SMTP id p26mr4129657ybc.348.1269819514174; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c682ecd1003281638u7551d74by62c06ddbd4c0de82@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Improving performance of Hadoop job From: Abhishek Verma To: general@hadoop.apache.org Cc: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd72a18123d190482e4e510 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd72a18123d190482e4e510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The log shows that Eclipse is running the job locally: 0/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.*LocalJobRunner*: Hence the difference in the run times. Normally, Hadoop jobs have a start up time of around 10 seconds atleast. -Abhishek. On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Something Something < mailinglists19@gmail.com> wrote: > When I run a Hadoop job in a command shell it runs in 21 secs, but when I > run the same from within Eclipse IDE it runs in 1 second! Trying to figure > out what the reason is. The output is shown below: > > 1) It appears the FILE_BYTES_READ, HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN etc values are > totally different. Sounds like that's what is causing the performance > degradation. > 2) I tried setting -Xmx1000m in the command shell but that doesn't help. > Are there other JVM arguments that affect values of these variables > (FILE_BYTES_READ etc)? > > Any hints would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks. > > > *Command Shell log:* > > INFO: Starting top scores writing job.... > 10/03/28 11:19:49 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > 10/03/28 11:19:50 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_201003281008_0006 > 10/03/28 11:19:51 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 0% reduce 0% > 10/03/28 11:19:59 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 0% > 10/03/28 11:20:04 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 100% > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: > job_201003281008_0006 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 16 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job Counters > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched reduce tasks=1 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Launched map tasks=1 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Data-local map tasks=1 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > *10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_READ=1736 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=3504 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN=3706 > *10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input groups=87 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=0 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=100 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce shuffle bytes=0 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce output records=100 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=200 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=1530 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=0 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=100 > 10/03/28 11:20:10 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input records=100 > *Total time for writing scores: 21 secs.* > > > > *Eclipse console log:* > > INFO: Starting top scores writing job.... > 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with > processName=JobTracker, sessionId= - already initialized > 10/03/28 11:29:15 WARN mapred.JobClient: Use GenericOptionsParser for > parsing the arguments. Applications should implement Tool for the same. > 10/03/28 11:29:15 WARN mapred.JobClient: No job jar file set. User classes > may not be found. See JobConf(Class) or JobConf#setJar(String). > 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO mapred.JobClient: Running job: job_local_0006 > 10/03/28 11:29:15 INFO mapred.MapTask: io.sort.mb = 100 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: data buffer = 79691776/99614720 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: record buffer = 262144/327680 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: Starting flush of map output > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.MapTask: Finished spill 0 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: > Task:attempt_local_0006_m_000000_0 > is done. And is in the process of commiting > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task > 'attempt_local_0006_m_000000_0' done. > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.Merger: Merging 1 sorted segments > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.Merger: Down to the last merge-pass, with 1 > segments left of total size: 1732 bytes > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: > Task:attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0 > is done. And is in the process of commiting > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task > attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0 > is allowed to commit now > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO output.FileOutputCommitter: Saved output of task > 'attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0' to markers/results > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.LocalJobRunner: reduce > reduce > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.TaskRunner: Task > 'attempt_local_0006_r_000000_0' done. > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: map 100% reduce 100% > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Job complete: job_local_0006 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Counters: 14 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FileSystemCounters > *10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_READ=95848 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_READ=277286 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: FILE_BYTES_WRITTEN=304886 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: HDFS_BYTES_WRITTEN=209112 > *10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map-Reduce Framework > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input groups=87 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine output records=0 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map input records=100 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce shuffle bytes=0 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce output records=100 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Spilled Records=200 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output bytes=1530 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Combine input records=0 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Map output records=100 > 10/03/28 11:29:16 INFO mapred.JobClient: Reduce input records=100 > *Total time for writing scores: 1 secs. > * > --000e0cd72a18123d190482e4e510-- From general-return-1257-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 29 19:03:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1089 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 19:03:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 19:03:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 52257 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 19:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51350 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 19:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51286 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2010 19:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.25] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:03:39 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so3874983qwh.35 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:03:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.149 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Kimball Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:02:54 -0700 Received: by 10.229.214.74 with SMTP id gz10mr64696qcb.25.1269889395272; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Sqoop is moving to github! To: hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362848204f2e8b0482f52a7f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016362848204f2e8b0482f52a7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Hadoop, Hive, and Sqoop users, For the past year, the Apache Hadoop MapReduce project has played host to Sqoop, a command-line tool that performs parallel imports and exports between relational databases and HDFS. We've developed a lot of features and gotten a lot of great feedback from users. While Sqoop was a contrib project in Hadoop, it has been steadily improved and grown. But the contrib directory is a home for new or small projects incubating underneath Hadoop's umbrella. Sqoop is starting to look less like a small project these days. In particular, a feature that has been growing in importance for Sqoop is its ability to integrate with Hive. In order to facilitate this integration from a compilation and testing standpoint, we've pulled Sqoop out of contrib and into its own repository hosted on github. You can download all the relevant bits here: http://www.github.com/cloudera/sqoop The code there will run in conjunction with the Apache Hadoop trunk source. (Compatibility with other distributions/versions is forthcoming.) While we've changed hosts, Sqoop will keep the same license -- future improvements will continue to remain Apache 2.0-licensed. We welcome the contributions of all in the open source community; there's a lot of exciting work still to be done! If you'd like to help out but aren't sure where to start, send me an email and I can recommend a few areas where improvements would be appreciated. Want some more information about Sqoop? An introduction is available here: http://www.cloudera.com/sqoop A ready-to-run release of Sqoop is included with Cloudera's Distribution for Hadoop: http://archive.cloudera.com And its reference manual is available for browsing at http://archive.cloudera.com/docs/sqoop If you have any questions about this move process, please ask me. Regards, - Aaron Kimball Cloudera, Inc. --0016362848204f2e8b0482f52a7f-- From general-return-1258-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 29 23:07:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83488 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 23:07:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 23:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 21137 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 23:07:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21041 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2010 23:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21033 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2010 23:07:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:07:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.schlaikjer@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:07:11 +0000 Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so6064902gyd.35 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ypy3paEjwCvfzeoZnAZiEDSJgFVDWkX+bpsSk9bXhv0=; b=QIo5+duLRtatnxzYo+mIYvSivT7C8cl8heBxultT+AFwaYXrJmUWbz+VduwlFYofGR dVHEdKBTBWTlVCRBdLphhNvgLOEiOBqCJHWjal5SdpHt7anuJvp7X0Hz9y1Lcs457LU8 xLAHIGNbf5RkRME3yKxgvFOAcPQLlesTVzO5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=EP4d+zAoTu70AcTQHXvTvgQPTLqsOtFuY6qicEIXYDWKwA0tg8Wz/1E6EeanF5Maf1 SJn2Mqvhijg85ygX9I/W0M7Hico/MOo5+MwyZMIIM3lcGwyrYaDsBcME3qXfjcdtnSrR PJmZzv8mwRJzeLVtJBMF31NS0Ds3EHO0cgLwE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.219.20 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:06:50 -0400 Received: by 10.151.5.11 with SMTP id h11mr5101533ybi.13.1269904010865; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> Subject: specification of type params in org.apache.hadoop.io.*Writable impls From: Andy Schlaikjer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Can anyone comment on why the base *Writable implementations (e.g. IntWritable, LongWritable, etc) don't specify WritableComparable's type param T? I noticed this when I tried to use DoubleWritable [1] within a custom WritableComparable parameterized type which constrains its own type params: public class Pair< First extends WritableComparable, Second extends WritableComparable> implements WritableComparable> { ... } With this declaration, something like the following will not compile: Pair pair = null; ERROR: Bound mismatch: The type DoubleWritable is not a valid substitute for the bounded parameter > of the type Pair However, if DoubleWritable were declared as follows, the above line would work just fine: public class DoubleWritable implements WritableComparable { ... } [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/DoubleWritable.java?revision=786726&view=markup Best, From general-return-1259-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 00:15:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96843 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 00:15:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 00:15:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 90262 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90227 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90219 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:15:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anthony.urso@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:15:03 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so6332010gxk.11 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AeIwJ9mZKL4FhDSH/RpiIL8KaAwS/BR0AzjBdl8PMWM=; b=buGEvjDeZqbPO+fqzkk3KTfOj00HMHFK6SLGzNrt/Ue7DueG7krLkMlyTcEh3GixHK ktmAn2k2cCLcY4ytW+Gs27FmlFvUkeEWbTf9llTyPOPNpSkKq/L5Xf6fW6etmuyhmvSc 6PDk6w2kP2ziNHOO3Xtzhb3Cnv79iYj2OL0R8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TR8koqylIpjMV9zQiwuG2w72hO9hxjx380Bcpv0xP/ykgpYJ/DhgGg74FhyY38yfqz LJFj1zUiz9EA+0UbQ0FMZbXH9ZszehD6MNVqcbINsW6tlu3YMuq/n6NkHglpVcl8aIGW Wr2+S1p6PdkJM7drwudDuwCUC87mvjG+fZxH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.124.31 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:14:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:14:41 -0700 Received: by 10.101.148.6 with SMTP id a6mr4508968ano.150.1269908081518; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to send KV pair to a reduce task on a particular machine? From: Anthony Urso To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The dirty way to do this is to have the reducer throw an exception if it receives a key that was not intended for the node it is running on. It will be rescheduled on another node, and eventually it will land on the correct one. Depending on the total number of nodes and reducers in the job, you may have to increase the max failed tasks configuration parameter in order that the whole job does not fail while the reducers are bouncing around from node to node. Cheers, Anthony On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Yanfeng Zhang wrote: > Hi, all > > The KV pairs (kv1, kv2, kv3 kv4) out from mapper would be partitioned into R > parts (e.g. R=2) by a partitioner. For example, kv1 and kv2 are in > partition1, while kv3 and kv4 are in partition2, the reducers will get KV > pairs from these two partitions, reducer1 get KV pairs from partition1 and > reducer2 get KV pairs from partition2. > > I want to let machine1 get KV pairs from partition1 and machine2 get KV > pairs from partition2. But reducer1 is not always on machine1, reducer2 is > not always on machine2. Is there any way to make sure kv1 and kv2 are sent > to machine1 and kv3, kv4 are sent to machine2? > > Thank you in advance! > > Sincerely, > -- > Yanfeng Zhang > From general-return-1260-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 01:22:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17195 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 01:22:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 01:22:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 74643 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 01:22:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74602 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 01:22:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74594 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 01:22:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:22:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of invisiblesun@mac.com designates 17.148.16.101 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.101] (HELO asmtpout026.mac.com) (17.148.16.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:21:52 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.27.35.143] (c-67-169-39-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.39.169]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L020083LMFF3L00@asmtp026.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:21:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1003290299 Subject: Re: specification of type params in org.apache.hadoop.io.*Writable impls From: Julia Smith In-reply-to: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:21:18 -0700 Message-id: <5F413AFC-D115-4561-8F48-73A42986477A@mac.com> References: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Java Generics are finicky. Basically the parameterized generic is not considered the same thing (type) as a class extended from it. I went through this when writing a deeply generic-ed package just to test its limits with a heavily templatized c++ package. On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Andy Schlaikjer wrote: > Can anyone comment on why the base *Writable implementations (e.g. > IntWritable, LongWritable, etc) don't specify WritableComparable's > type param T? > > I noticed this when I tried to use DoubleWritable [1] within a custom > WritableComparable parameterized type which constrains its own type > params: > > public class Pair< > First extends WritableComparable, > Second extends WritableComparable> > implements WritableComparable> { > ... > } > > With this declaration, something like the following will not compile: > > Pair pair = null; > > ERROR: Bound mismatch: The type DoubleWritable is not a valid > substitute for the bounded parameter WritableComparable> of the type Pair > > However, if DoubleWritable were declared as follows, the above line > would work just fine: > > public class DoubleWritable implements WritableComparable { > ... > } > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/DoubleWritable.java?revision=786726&view=markup > > Best, From general-return-1261-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 08:55:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8040 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 08:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 08:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6180 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 08:55:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5955 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 08:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5943 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 08:55:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:55:22 +0000 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so5402982wyf.35 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VfSE8TqigkGnBDtKUnnXTT7YFO3COf3AWA7Z6NILBGs=; b=BTPDQN/GpYV2TywFBNUGIQEXTlReqt9tLXxkl1bgf4T7cUSu8qmj2N4XxOwsT8XSVR DbUsSiQnZslUMr9L/JmjvVgZbGMw7grrEkosbesBvlr/7sYcEBew6n7V7YCRVGiL5VjE AGWAMGNUY0nxdGzNMr2fjb+HGfY3Te/KjydnM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=C/Iyz73DLEY5avI0LlvnmCF6GJBTBrn5+E4pnH8x6R2VW4LOI8Dg9eNPXtVZQIEYjt MFta0hqDw+K0jJeSYfkta4X+kMqE+Z3JmE+lBDBRcc97E8af7D6OvR4vQ0ceARcYi/uM rVaBg1ZCfPbphpuRAd9Z3MxCH18SrXFPCfE34= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.35 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:55:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:55:02 +0200 Received: by 10.216.86.71 with SMTP id v49mr3400561wee.14.1269939302068; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Aaron, Good to see you are a contributor to sqoop. Are you a committer yet? Do you haven an ICLA on file with the ASF? I cannot find any record of it. I must be missing something here, since PMCs are normally requesting ICLAs from people making such substantial code contributions. On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 21:02, Aaron Kimball wrote: > Hi Hadoop, Hive, and Sqoop users, > > For the past year, the Apache Hadoop MapReduce project has played host to > Sqoop, a command-line tool that performs parallel imports and exports > between relational databases and HDFS. We've developed a lot of features and > gotten a lot of great feedback from users. Who is "we" exactly? Cloudera? Hadoop? You? > While Sqoop was a contrib project > in Hadoop, it has been steadily improved and grown. Cool. > But the contrib directory is a home for new or small projects incubating > underneath Hadoop's umbrella. Sqoop is starting to look less like a small > project these days. In particular, a feature that has been growing in > importance for Sqoop is its ability to integrate with Hive. In order to > facilitate this integration from a compilation and testing standpoint, we've > pulled Sqoop out of contrib and into its own repository hosted on github. So, you are forking sqoop. To facilitate that an Hadoop project can work with another Hadoop project. What are the issues with Hadoop that you cannot do it within Hadoop itself? > You can download all the relevant bits here: > http://www.github.com/cloudera/sqoop > > The code there will run in conjunction with the Apache Hadoop trunk source. > (Compatibility with other distributions/versions is forthcoming.) Sqoop is in ASF svn. What do you do when someone is going to continue developing it here. Then there's a naming clash. Do you intend to rename your fork? > While we've changed hosts, Sqoop will keep the same license -- future > improvements will continue to remain Apache 2.0-licensed. We welcome the > contributions of all in the open source community; there's a lot of exciting > work still to be done! If you'd like to help out but aren't sure where to > start, send me an email and I can recommend a few areas where improvements > would be appreciated. Who is "we" in this case? The same "we" as above? @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? Thanks for clarifying, Bernd From general-return-1262-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 13:48:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93283 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 13:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 13:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 26813 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 13:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26755 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 13:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26747 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 13:48:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:48:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:48:49 +0000 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so8842267pwi.35 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:48:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bHKYbUmSWixyksVlCkpB7iiZ472zchp+wrETtFUSwvs=; b=hNAvi76KfI0bWrCeLXUJO2V5lEb/UeuKKKqwEKZSuL5nvKy9AhcnI3Pm9suJF/1ip3 7+NYlgKqUMlQn/IKO2jeO+qu/v6TMetxXWQH4oiLaS3pI7wRAGpsn30aSdbS5wODE3NX GXR1sWIUlkTu0WFgvlKcvU5VleBeZvhwwKWiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=raJ6tIjLh127BPLE0it2MAc55BSIM+AatKGuccIJQgXkwUCA+MefCZV68QGVZOyYLo S1cuGqlgGVsc7Bw/B0ylSPH19Q8WP9vhsJmMqSQFVrhGN5liO5O1u5oIHCbb6RTOvHG9 TOOXh95MgAetb7Zh35oJPJHnDR6FjF5c2/XRw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.58.211 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:48:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:48:28 -0700 Received: by 10.140.251.8 with SMTP id y8mr5740680rvh.231.1269956908297; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd17fa6662e00048304e26e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd17fa6662e00048304e26e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > > @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? Aaron has been the primary developer of Sqoop. He has asked for it to be removed from MapReduce's contrib. If a committer -1's the code removal, it will cause a fork. But that hasn't happened and I don't think it will. In order for it to make sense to keep the code in Hadoop, someone needs to be working on it and the only person working on it is Aaron. If someone wants to make a case for keeping Sqoop in MapReduce, please make it in the jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1644 The sub-projects must avoid circular dependencies. We must be able to build the sub-projects in order without having to go back and update a previous project. Making a component of MapReduce depend on Hive (or Pig) would cause that kind of cycle. Some projects like Zebra just live in the upper project (Pig in that case). The other option is to ask to be a sub-project, ask to join Apache incubator, or go to Github. Github doesn't give him the legal or community aspects of Apache, but it also doesn't require asking permission or introduce any process requirements. -- Owen --000e0cd17fa6662e00048304e26e-- From general-return-1263-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 14:02:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98274 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 14:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 14:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 45263 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45190 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:02:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45182 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 14:02:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:02:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.schlaikjer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:02:04 +0000 Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so4888494vws.35 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ov2SylEhwbS4GjKRwk/AlbSlbG4ba3sxTZxziVKyCrQ=; b=fFflOU0Mj9Rt6OaL9keg0ZBoJw6yWY7gAi82TdVqwYElZseO/ciIdxXH3CIbpADqkW xjVaNVU9gNhbEV6SDEcG7JTlPBE76HaVFMjyAeQP6GJt+BVI0eEidfF2yocqYVTaUXcs qtXT006NnPj8SHIxHD7vUpNSDE+0TlYGkrKTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GGYgZz0USRhcFApLlFtMMPWgC5XBRmTk5tY+lGC+kPuqWovhdOKFni99SeaTeYzqtu 9lZZFrDRPylC+/VTeV4neEocjC8tohZHYKjGlK/erqw38JDHEAUSIMqI1ZjHr2UiCZiH YwUzQMor9N5BCAM03IwlK4GZriPeY2x+36z2k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.219.20 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5F413AFC-D115-4561-8F48-73A42986477A@mac.com> References: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> <5F413AFC-D115-4561-8F48-73A42986477A@mac.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:01:43 -0400 Received: by 10.220.126.200 with SMTP id d8mr3991117vcs.166.1269957703252; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76c0da9a1003300701o5e7f8a2ifd4a2d262bf92651@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: specification of type params in org.apache.hadoop.io.*Writable impls From: Andy Schlaikjer To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've received a number of responses from helpful Hadoop list members. Thanks! But I should clarify here; I'm not looking for workarounds for my Pair declaration or explanations of Java's generics facilities. I'm looking for justifications for Hadoop's approach. Looking at Java's core library, there are 86 classes which implement java.lang.Comparable [1]. 80 of these specify T = the type being declared, or some parent of the type being declared. [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Comparable.html So, I'm curious, are there specific use cases the Hadoop community has run into which support the current design of the primitive *Writable types which excludes specification of Comparable's T param? If not I'll try and find time to work on a patch to push more conventional use of generics into Hadoop Common. Best, From general-return-1264-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 14:54:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15072 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 14:54:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 14:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 34144 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34093 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 14:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34085 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 14:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:54:38 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so992611eyf.23 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:54:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FAe8F3DxV6xNvQtatotBq5/GoQCyDzvz1Z4Yc+HF/XI=; b=rxiPA9yPgkKmiIAZQ4S/IgGANS/gS1a1mjQEePfy6+lPUBOFqnd38Fr/iG6Ysfl8H8 aFQZ7MLPa1UT4PFP4XpWKbGBz6IGuVTs3O0MmrBaps7aEhi3EGUGOOaBA0Ib7waY/TPS /jfO1oRUulVjGVc4USEHIKuBrsrpSyYk6HZsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MS2MR1+YG6p8QzCKEuW8DVPH0mR9nKpl8qKFaKrR6zRI2t1kY/VApuLzVXgH4sXp/T BM3r5PuhAy2BI5UlqTWpjv0oW+PEbmsDAzrX2jdlBEcgUWXwNkCS6KuvVJeNj48U7+J+ hPKZg0/iT3ZCCNTgxg2s62G7Q5ea7GumpJIO8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.35 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:54:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:54:17 +0200 Received: by 10.216.87.146 with SMTP id y18mr762904wee.127.1269960857086; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 15:48, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann < > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> >> @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? > > > Aaron has been the primary developer of Sqoop. He has asked for it to be > removed from MapReduce's contrib. If a committer -1's the code removal, it > will cause a fork. But that hasn't happened and I don't think it will. It's not the contributor's code alone anymore, once it's been committed. Where has this been discussed? Where's the PMC-level vote/record of consensus to ratify to abandon the code? (ML + TS will be sufficient and I'll find my way.) > In > order for it to make sense to keep the code in Hadoop, someone needs to be > working on it and the only person working on it is Aaron. If someone wants > to make a case for keeping Sqoop in MapReduce, please make it in the jira: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1644 Well, at least someone reviewed and committed all the contributions to svn in the first place, he can't be the only one working on it. > The sub-projects must avoid circular dependencies. We must be able to build > the sub-projects in order without having to go back and update a previous > project. Making a component of MapReduce depend on Hive (or Pig) would cause > that kind of cycle. Some projects like Zebra just live in the upper project > (Pig in that case). The other option is to ask to be a sub-project, ask to > join Apache incubator, or go to Github. Github doesn't give him the legal or > community aspects of Apache, but it also doesn't require asking permission > or introduce any process requirements. Well, I'm not looking at this from the contributor's perspective here. He can do with the code whatever he likes, basically. It's only the PMC's viewpoint which is interesting for me. Bernd From general-return-1265-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 16:51:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55477 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 16:51:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 16:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 93429 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 16:51:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93391 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 16:51:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93380 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 16:51:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:51:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:51:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 55399 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 16:51:10 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.100]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:51:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4BB22BFE.30906@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:51:10 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: specification of type params in org.apache.hadoop.io.*Writable impls References: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Andy Schlaikjer wrote: > Can anyone comment on why the base *Writable implementations (e.g. > IntWritable, LongWritable, etc) don't specify WritableComparable's > type param T? I suspect it's just historic. When they were first written we were not using Java generics, and no one has ever retrofitted them with generics. Doug From general-return-1266-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 17:28:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62740 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 17:28:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 17:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 58199 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58127 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58119 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 17:28:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:28:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of invisiblesun@mac.com designates 17.148.16.103 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.103] (HELO asmtpout028.mac.com) (17.148.16.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:28:47 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [172.27.35.143] (c-67-169-39-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.39.169]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L030059FV76RS80@asmtp028.mac.com> for general@hadoop.apache.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:28:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1003300170 Subject: Re: specification of type params in org.apache.hadoop.io.*Writable impls From: Julia Smith In-reply-to: <4BB22BFE.30906@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:28:18 -0700 Message-id: References: <76c0da9a1003291606h53e46a8gfa75f786b84db834@mail.gmail.com> <4BB22BFE.30906@apache.org> To: general@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) It's easy enough to change the prototype to Comparable, should fix it. On Mar 30, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Andy Schlaikjer wrote: >> Can anyone comment on why the base *Writable implementations (e.g. >> IntWritable, LongWritable, etc) don't specify WritableComparable's >> type param T? > > I suspect it's just historic. When they were first written we were not using Java generics, and no one has ever retrofitted them with generics. > > Doug From general-return-1267-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 17:53:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67921 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 17:53:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 17:53:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 91372 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91336 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91328 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 17:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.26] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:53:33 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so4531277qwh.35 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:53:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.149 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:52:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:52:51 -0700 Received: by 10.229.38.147 with SMTP id b19mr1681212qce.102.1269971591391; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:53:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! To: Bernd Fondermann Cc: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8be89477de0483084d90 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b8be89477de0483084d90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Bernd, These are some important questions about the status of the project; thanks for asking them. I'll go through them inline to preserve context on each one. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > Good to see you are a contributor to sqoop. Are you a committer yet? > Do you haven an ICLA on file with the ASF? I cannot find any record of it. > I must be missing something here, since PMCs are normally requesting > ICLAs from people making such substantial code contributions. > > It might be more precise to call me *the* contributor to Sqoop. I've written about 98% of the code for it; a few other individuals have provided me with small enhancements or bugfixes, but the overwhelming amount of its care and feeding has been under my watch. I am not a committer on the Hadoop MapReduce (or any other ASF) project. Thus far, nobody has invited me to sign an ICLA with my contributor-only status. I have relied on others (primarily Tom White) to actually commit all the Sqoop patches to svn. > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 21:02, Aaron Kimball wrote: > > Hi Hadoop, Hive, and Sqoop users, > > > > For the past year, the Apache Hadoop MapReduce project has played host to > > Sqoop, a command-line tool that performs parallel imports and exports > > between relational databases and HDFS. We've developed a lot of features > and > > gotten a lot of great feedback from users. > > Who is "we" exactly? Cloudera? Hadoop? You? > > Both myself and Cloudera. As said above, the vast majority of the direct work on the project has been my own. But there are others at Cloudera who have helped in less visible fashion with feature prioritization, design input, code review, QA, user support, etc. And the contributions I make to Sqoop, I do so as an employee of Cloudera. > > While Sqoop was a contrib project > > in Hadoop, it has been steadily improved and grown. > > Cool. > > > But the contrib directory is a home for new or small projects incubating > > underneath Hadoop's umbrella. Sqoop is starting to look less like a small > > project these days. In particular, a feature that has been growing in > > importance for Sqoop is its ability to integrate with Hive. In order to > > facilitate this integration from a compilation and testing standpoint, > we've > > pulled Sqoop out of contrib and into its own repository hosted on github. > > So, you are forking sqoop. To facilitate that an Hadoop project can > work with another Hadoop project. > What are the issues with Hadoop that you cannot do it within Hadoop itself? > > When you put it like that, "forking" seems like a bit of a strong term. As said in my original email, I prefer to think of it as "moving." (See the next answer below for more on this.) I believe Owen has already described some of the technical problems. Conflating Sqoop's source repository with Hadoop's causes unnecessary circular dependencies that build tools cannot easily work around. The more straightforward method is to factor out Sqoop into a separate source repository. > > You can download all the relevant bits here: > > http://www.github.com/cloudera/sqoop > > > > The code there will run in conjunction with the Apache Hadoop trunk > source. > > (Compatibility with other distributions/versions is forthcoming.) > > Sqoop is in ASF svn. What do you do when someone is going to continue > developing it here. > Then there's a naming clash. Do you intend to rename your fork? > I have filed MAPREDUCE-1644 with a patch that completely removes Sqoop from the MapReduce repository. This will remove Sqoop from the working copy of the repository, but of course, it will still belong to the ASF's repository history. (Thus, I hope this will be seen as a straightforward lateral move more than a fork.) It's worth pointing out that Sqoop was originally introduced in HADOOP-5815, committed after 0.20 was branched for release and closed to new features. So Sqoop has only existed on unreleased development branches in ASF svn. As such, removing new features from the working copy is still allowed. As Hadoop is gearing up for a new release, now is the time to consider whether side-projects like this belong in the same umbrella project. Others can -1 the removal patch and force a copy of Sqoop to remain in ASF. This will force Sqoop to be bundled with the impending Hadoop 0.21 release. However, I do not intend to rename Sqoop. I also intend to do all feature and bugfix development in the new repository on github. I will be monitoring the issue tracker on github for bug reports and feature requests. For someone else to seriously -1 MAPREDUCE-1644, they'd need to be willing to fix bugs in the ASF copy themselves, or cross-port the patches I develop at github and graft them on to the ASF copy. If others are interested in contributing to Sqoop and would like to take on a role in the project, I welcome them to come help me out at github, rather than force a true fork to occur and work within MapReduce svn. If enough people want to work on Sqoop but feel strongly that we should remain in the ASF (e.g., by introducing a new project in the incubator), I'm certainly open to listening to that point of view. But that's a separate discussion from this one. > > > While we've changed hosts, Sqoop will keep the same license -- future > > improvements will continue to remain Apache 2.0-licensed. We welcome the > > contributions of all in the open source community; there's a lot of > exciting > > work still to be done! If you'd like to help out but aren't sure where to > > start, send me an email and I can recommend a few areas where > improvements > > would be appreciated. > > Who is "we" in this case? The same "we" as above? > > Indeed. > @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? > > Thanks for clarifying, > > Bernd > Regards, - Aaron Kimball --0016363b8be89477de0483084d90-- From general-return-1268-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 17:58:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68929 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 17:58:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 17:58:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 96444 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:58:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96373 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 17:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96365 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 17:58:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:58:53 +0000 Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so5129737vws.35 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.149 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:58:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> From: Aaron Kimball Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:58:12 -0700 Received: by 10.229.192.142 with SMTP id dq14mr1123412qcb.81.1269971912139; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636285362b2a5990483086016 --001636285362b2a5990483086016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 15:48, Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann < > > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? > > > > > > Aaron has been the primary developer of Sqoop. He has asked for it to be > > removed from MapReduce's contrib. If a committer -1's the code removal, > it > > will cause a fork. But that hasn't happened and I don't think it will. > > It's not the contributor's code alone anymore, once it's been committed. > Where has this been discussed? Where's the PMC-level vote/record of > consensus to ratify to abandon the code? > (ML + TS will be sufficient and I'll find my way.) > > I believe that technically the discussion (such as it is) on MAPREDUCE-1644 will stand as the record of vote. It's still open for new comments. > > In > > order for it to make sense to keep the code in Hadoop, someone needs to > be > > working on it and the only person working on it is Aaron. If someone > wants > > to make a case for keeping Sqoop in MapReduce, please make it in the > jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-1644 > > Well, at least someone reviewed and committed all the contributions to > svn in the first place, he can't be the only one working on it. > > Indeed. Hadoop committers have checked in all my contributions; Tom White has done the lion's share of this work. > > The sub-projects must avoid circular dependencies. We must be able to > build > > the sub-projects in order without having to go back and update a previous > > project. Making a component of MapReduce depend on Hive (or Pig) would > cause > > that kind of cycle. Some projects like Zebra just live in the upper > project > > (Pig in that case). The other option is to ask to be a sub-project, ask > to > > join Apache incubator, or go to Github. Github doesn't give him the legal > or > > community aspects of Apache, but it also doesn't require asking > permission > > or introduce any process requirements. > > Well, I'm not looking at this from the contributor's perspective here. > He can do with the code whatever he likes, basically. > It's only the PMC's viewpoint which is interesting for me. > > Bernd > - Aaron --001636285362b2a5990483086016-- From general-return-1269-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 18:08:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72330 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 18:08:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 18:08:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17055 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 18:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17002 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 18:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16994 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 18:08:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of owen.omalley@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.177] (HELO mail-pz0-f177.google.com) (209.85.222.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:07:58 +0000 Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7so114836pzk.30 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g9DtwsbVFco4IzPEtdTq9S/DYPQbzwGGVGVlA4NU8Uo=; b=URg8ruSidpUHQ/aYPxEbCpdGC7NrQj9jFs6/ean0uWzFiwxArNAauCwqt7FZ3yRqsV RObB/H34a+cSXiE0mh5YfscEw3CJKzn3JFFHJNwpj+PahANGRUjiu3knGPAIVpsQJMq1 AOY6XiDUccupLead5kSO1UtF2aKFTHhW/k6lE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eQps9MAHaFwjSCIbhKElCXuCn3D9a/b+xDULJ+OLfbG6QiZ7uqU5Ah9My2kT6CJ8YT 9Lr6WiR7Lp4bfXExZOzfltj1GXQyzMeWoVVXZmOvvrHkZ4yv9lQiX1Ce+QzHeO+tr7pR l7MfeK6oGaSLGh4fsp56dUJ2xG0U3XdTuEFS0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.20 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:07:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:07:36 -0700 Received: by 10.141.22.16 with SMTP id z16mr1237376rvi.20.1269972456751; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f7f740b1003301107p6d25ec27k69acc27286fec8c7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! From: "Owen O'Malley" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd1855028c4bf0483088183 --000e0cd1855028c4bf0483088183 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann < bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: Where has this been discussed? Where's the PMC-level vote/record of > consensus to ratify to abandon the code? > The (lack of) discussion is in the jira and this thread. In Hadoop, we treat adding and removing contrib projects as simple code additions or removals that use lazy consensus among the committers. If someone wants to block it, the previously mentioned MAPREDUCE-1644 is the proper avenue. So far, no one in the project has vetoed the removal. -- Owen --000e0cd1855028c4bf0483088183-- From general-return-1270-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 19:22:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94572 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 19:22:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 19:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18506 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 19:22:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18382 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 19:22:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18374 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 19:22:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:22:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:22:28 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so1037960eyf.23 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R0MvOgl/veFaeudBnOfKuvroaopAbzy/ViwrqKYaAKE=; b=PwNY/FVKXyEzSbi8iHu3LmYpKwNO4W1KrfcrrPAevctyrUYTYJy8KSnauwLiCmWA29 g4vrG9Oblcom4XDFanWJcRA7y2Ye5g7A5lzUPbzvnXUzOnmybh1LQiUoMk4fcEe9duPT /SWTO7xeCOqU9cOUXtv/G1e4Dn3iXA30JNDV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uMC9cpSM09dsOQd1uiRa8sAX6SZ2skN1By4SORxd9yzEHMC8LZApjhbR7OJLv+4m1M jz584Fv2wri4LII8tiBoYBRC3dF1uI7RO2qJCvAtun6TozqtnHXp8/0E+YzBEgFK56Is mFokCiluqHtawiM3pu9SM18Cr+GYyejDkKoNk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.16.35 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <88f6e29a1003300155v1a553afcy59b2a5b7a34fbf5@mail.gmail.com> <5f7f740b1003300648u6a9bbb5fj9a2e4eddbe737b8c@mail.gmail.com> <88f6e29a1003300754m1826b4f0ve664df8e6b270ae0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:22:07 +0200 Received: by 10.216.90.9 with SMTP id d9mr1820515wef.95.1269976927381; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88f6e29a1003301222u2ccac962p6a0cbe03b8544930@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sqoop is moving to github! From: Bernd Fondermann To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 19:58, Aaron Kimball wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann < > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 15:48, Owen O'Malley >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann < >> > bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> @Hadoop PMC: What is your statement on this fork announcement? >> > >> > >> > Aaron has been the primary developer of Sqoop. He has asked for it to be >> > removed from MapReduce's contrib. If a committer -1's the code removal, >> it >> > will cause a fork. But that hasn't happened and I don't think it will. >> >> It's not the contributor's code alone anymore, once it's been committed. >> Where has this been discussed? Where's the PMC-level vote/record of >> consensus to ratify to abandon the code? >> (ML + TS will be sufficient and I'll find my way.) >> >> > I believe that technically the discussion (such as it is) on MAPREDUCE-1644 > will stand as the record of vote. It's still open for new comments. No, I don't think so. This isn't the record of anything else than your intentions. But that's shouldn't be your concern. Bernd From general-return-1271-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 21:32:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24104 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 21:32:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 21:32:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 76847 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 21:32:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76684 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 21:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76676 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 21:32:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:32:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com designates 69.28.149.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.28.149.24] (HELO esv4-mav02.corp.linkedin.com) (69.28.149.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:32:28 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:CC: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime; b=f8YCdvMQXsp/jVTwwox3kkohRow06dGtI5iN0xTInwUHWK0C8dVw3e1f VsfPgQa5tPz3p8ORH7xtnYZTZRlAl4M1toL6ukTWOlSTqoCbkAGrbKmJz PluqMtnuNqi7tJX; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=linkedin.com; i=awittenauer@linkedin.com; q=dns/txt; s=proddkim; t=1269984748; x=1301520748; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Allen=20Wittenauer=20 |Subject:=20[ANNOUNCEMENT]=20Azkaban=20is=20now=20open=20 source!|Date:=20Tue,=2030=20Mar=202010=2021:31:06=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20 |To:=20"general@hadoop.apache.org"=20|CC:=20"azkaban-dev@googlegroups.com"=20|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |Content-ID:=20<94be957b-4f74-41fe-bf09-46fa3041e0ac>; bh=D+9uv+InQWpNznPw1wzOaClRspL8MkmlGAHg2vFWmys=; b=NdMq0SYNF5D6/ftXFOWgEBw51hla9sQ8vYJhXjcKA4GRjW8JhRaZsEss dVJdxFazdGgzaNiIG4KcuBYW5n+wfJgD+9cYyRoaHSNun0Im2LNJfgUBF vkbi7gAEFL9EvzN; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,336,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="12038084" Received: from esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.60]) by CORP-MAIL.linkedin.biz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:31:08 -0700 Received: from ESV4-CAS02.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.142) by esv4-exctest.linkedin.biz (172.18.46.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.682.1; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:31:08 -0700 Received: from ESV4-EXC01.linkedin.biz ([fe80::d7c:dc04:aea1:97d7]) by esv4-cas02.linkedin.biz ([172.18.46.142]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:31:08 -0700 From: Allen Wittenauer To: "general@hadoop.apache.org" CC: "azkaban-dev@googlegroups.com" Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Azkaban is now open source! Thread-Topic: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Azkaban is now open source! Thread-Index: AcrQUE4dHU2SOcm3LEiKRPBpvGZKOA== Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:31:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <94be957b-4f74-41fe-bf09-46fa3041e0ac> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2010 21:31:08.0662 (UTC) FILETIME=[4FB3B960:01CAD050] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Many of you that attended the Bay Area HUG meeting in January* wanted t= o know if and when LinkedIn would be open sourcing our simple batch scheduler for Hadoop. I'm pleased to announce that, yes, Azkaban is now available under the Apache License! http://sna-projects.com/azkaban/ For those that aren't familiar, Azkaban is LinkedIn's solution to running multiple, scheduled batch jobs (workflows) against our Hadoop grids= . It supports dependency chains, a web UI, job upload capability, Pig, external-to-Hadoop steps, and more. While the project is still in its infancy, we have been using it successfully for a variety of uses for about 9 months. It drives some of our most complex job flows and manages our ETL processes. We look forward to any questions/comments/bugs/features/patches you might have.=20 * - slides and video of the January HUG are available here: http://bit.ly/4Wjf6f From general-return-1272-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 30 23:51:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57100 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2010 23:51:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Mar 2010 23:51:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17330 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 23:51:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17257 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2010 23:51:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17249 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 23:51:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:51:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:51:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 57068 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2010 23:51:25 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.168.100]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username cutting, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:51:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4BB28E7C.90300@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:51:24 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Avro as TLP? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Avro subproject has voted to become a TLP: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-avro-dev/201003.mbox/%3C4BAA70A6.10907@apache.org%3E Does the Hadoop community have any questions or concerns about this proposal? Please don't vote yet in response to this. I'll call a formal vote after questions, if any, have been resolved. Thanks, Doug From general-return-1273-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 31 07:50:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40003 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2010 07:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2010 07:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29825 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 07:50:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27750 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 07:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27606 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2010 07:50:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:50:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.2.104] (HELO koch.ro) (88.198.2.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:50:33 +0000 Received: from 84-72-85-88.dclient.hispeed.ch ([84.72.85.88] helo=jona.localnet) by koch.ro with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwscy-0007mq-5h; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:46:16 +0200 From: Thomas Koch Reply-To: thomas@koch.ro To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" , java-user@lucene.apache.org, java-dev@lucene.apache.org, solr-dev@lucene.apache.org, solr-user@lucene.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [ANN] Eclipse GIT plugin beta version released Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:50:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-2-amd64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003310950.03579.thomas@koch.ro> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org GIT is one of the most popular distributed version control system. In the hope, that more Java developers may want to explore the world of easy branching, merging and patch management, I'd like to inform you, that a beta version of the upcoming Eclipse GIT plugin is available: http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/03/egit-released http://aniszczyk.org/2010/03/22/the-start-of-an-adventure-egitjgit-0-7-1/ Maybe, one day, some apache / hadoop projects will use GIT... :-) (Yes, I know git.apache.org.) Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro From general-return-1274-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 31 20:07:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38645 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2010 20:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2010 20:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26622 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 20:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26456 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 20:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26448 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2010 20:07:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mona@apture.com designates 67.221.235.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.221.235.209] (HELO web06.apture.com) (67.221.235.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:07:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 26555 invoked by uid 89); 31 Mar 2010 20:06:43 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 26549, pid: 26551, t: 0.9966s scanners: regex: 1.1.0 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on morpheus.contegix.com X-Spam-Level: * Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.42.165?) (mona@apture.com@71.133.225.222) by 67-221-235-209.contegix.com with ESMTPA; 31 Mar 2010 20:06:42 -0000 From: Mona Gandhi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Q about use of avro logs with hadoop streaming Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:06:40 -0700 Message-Id: <859D76D2-50AE-4E66-974A-3B47621323F6@apture.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.2.5 i currently use avro version 1.3.0 to log data. I am having difficulty = processing these avro logs via a map reduce job written in Python using = hadoop streaming(v 0.21.0).=20 Any help here is much appreciated. Thanks, Mona From general-return-1275-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 31 22:21:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79123 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2010 22:21:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2010 22:21:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 59562 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 22:21:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59508 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 22:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59500 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2010 22:21:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:21:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.59.243] (HELO qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:21:37 +0000 Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zmxt1d0041vXlb85DyMG29; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:21:16 +0000 Received: from wlan-snve-152-239.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.115]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zyRK1d00N2VBGtd3dyRPaD; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:25:27 +0000 Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Welcome Namit Jain to the Hadoop PMC Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:21:06 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) The Hadoop PMC has voted to add Namit Jain to the Hadoop PMC. Congratulations, Namit! -- Owen From general-return-103-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 08 20:10:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 37506 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2009 20:10:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2009 20:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 54125 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 20:10:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53984 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 20:10:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53867 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2009 20:10:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:10:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.171] (HELO mrout1.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:10:31 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n08KA0ju064183; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:10:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=jSJ/BpSMD2KQOua1bcN0K69I19oYYLvws0NqElGV/vZHG7Yr6ywBLPGagZ6nEejD Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:10:00 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C971CD.15AE268E" Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:10:00 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 Thread-Index: AclxzRWJr3aRXeNpT8mNevp3DrZJWg== From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2009 20:10:00.0614 (UTC) FILETIME=[15E20C60:01C971CD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C971CD.15AE268E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 21st at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. =20 Agenda: Hadoop 0.20 Overview - Sameer Paranjpye Hadoop 1.0 discussion - Sanjay Radia. =20 Please send me any other suggestions for topics for future meetings. =20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1478614 =20 Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C971CD.15AE268E-- From general-return-104-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jan 12 15:24:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 61723 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2009 15:24:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2009 15:24:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 60415 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 15:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60338 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 15:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48510 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2009 11:13:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hbjerryzl@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.188 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=syRpSbpQxM67/xeFqyl0yp4mFBBd0hX8fph3TnYz8/E=; b=rsbguJ0YddHbgy5+k5OJHILc46VNBUjuS+4D7/qXxV7OycOqgTUR8LPsjJg3iSPrO/ rHhajK8qdtbn+rtWw8VdfS4y8ZBXGddAaNpnQxaHd6nEYPlwv1bcH2W9w0CxZP+yd1/Z l07dhRX4TqH4UULg+cLrzksa5e0njOqw5iFBU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vp8/gHFll/eqsAhd5bU0FgWzlTevbX5bXnt79tuzorH32ZTu7yfYNzOLDS6cRpOLKV uQXaMRSlDzQ0FHkgcze+3LwUz2kYQW9PJaRO1Z5TDu0627XTBjp89sNMr/8AZAgpFvLD Vm9vW8znaExC+CJOIJiWo3fUKB2/Jo+dFzjAo= Message-ID: <496B25D3.6030504@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:13:23 +0800 From: jerry User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: libhdfs skipping incompatible jvm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org my OS is Linux 2.6.18-92.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 19:20:18 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux (64bit) my java version is jdk-6u11-linux-x64-rpm.bin (64bit) i change the "-m32" config to "-m64". when i build the "libhdfs", it said that: *compile-libhdfs: [exec] gcc -L/home/jerry/jdk1.6.0_12/jre/lib/i386/server -ljvm -shared -m64 -o /home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/libhdfs.so.1 -Wl,-soname,libhdfs.so /home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/hdfs.o /home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/hdfsJniHelper.o \ [exec] && ln -sf /home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/libhdfs.so.1 /home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/libhdfs.so [exec] /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /home/jerry/jdk1.6.0_12/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so when searching for -ljvm [exec] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ljvm [exec] collect2: ld ·µ»Ø 1 [exec] make: *** [/home/jerry/hadoop-0.19.0/build/libhdfs/libhdfs.so.1] is this a bug? * From general-return-105-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 13 00:19:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 1122 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 00:19:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 00:19:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 82478 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 00:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82459 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 00:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82448 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2009 00:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:49 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown amx-all (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of tim.hawkins@bejant.com) Received: from [209.85.219.21] (HELO mail-ew0-f21.google.com) (209.85.219.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:41 +0000 Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so11995041ewy.5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.90.20 with SMTP id n20mr4392569ebb.198.1231805958571; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from MainMacbook.lan (thawkins-adsl.demon.co.uk [80.176.168.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm692846gvc.17.2009.01.12.16.19.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Tim Hawkins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: New User Questions Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:16 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have just recently started working with hadoop and I have a few questions I would like to submit to the community. 1. Is there any remote-able interface to the jobtracker, so that I can create an application that would remotely be able to track jobs. Ie something like a rest or XMLRPC interface?. 2. Is it possible to attach additional metadata to a job for tracking purposes, we have a set of tasks that result in a large number of jobs per task, and I would like to tag jobs with an overall task id for tracking purposes. A usage case would be a nutch crawl, our application uses nutch to scan domains on demand, each scan is a distinct task, and nutch spawns a set of mapred tasks for each stage of the crawl. I would like to be able to determine completion status for a set of nutch crawls using an interface to job-tracker. From general-return-106-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 16 15:57:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 42261 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2009 15:57:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2009 15:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 96062 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 15:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95876 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 15:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95864 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2009 15:57:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:57:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown amx-all (nike.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of tim.hawkins@bejant.com) Received: from [209.85.219.21] (HELO mail-ew0-f21.google.com) (209.85.219.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:57:01 +0000 Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so1950651ewy.5 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.109.10 with SMTP id h10mr3352537ebc.39.1232121400867; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.14? (82-35-84-223.cable.ubr03.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.84.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b36sm2327425ika.7.2009.01.16.07.56.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:56:40 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: From: Tim Hawkins To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Security Groups in Hadoop-ec2 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:56:39 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have been playing with hadoop-ec2 (src/contrib/ec2) and have found a minor problem When a cluster is launched, it creates two security groups and cross links them, ie for cluster-name xxxx it creates EC2 security groups xxxx and xxxx-master , the cross-linking is i believe to allow all the masters and slaves to be able to communicate with each other. Unfortunately this means that the security groups are now mutually dependant on each other, and the amazon API will no longer allow them to be deleted, none of the GUI tools (rightscale, elasticFox, and consol.aws) or the command-line tools seem to be able to remove the security groups either, presumably because they too are dependant on the API. I believe the solution would be to create 3 security groups, not two, xxxx, xxxx-slave and xxxx-master , and only inherit permissions from xxxx into the other two, which would achieve the same result but be more "friendly". It would also potentially offer the ability for multiple clusters to share base security descriptors with other subsystems without having to open publicly accessible holes, by allowing the name of xxxx to be set independent of the cluster-name, allowing it to be shared as a base. I can make this change to the scripts and test it on our set-up, but am not sure how to contribute the changes back to ensure that this problem does not effect others. From general-return-107-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 16 17:45:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 88422 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2009 17:45:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2009 17:45:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 74794 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 17:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74775 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 17:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74764 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2009 17:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:45:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.156] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:45:03 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so988163fgb.35 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LM8GFgNKTQ1xbRy2wAUV9C8CMDU4gDxl4eFLiaqv4ww=; b=cn631esQvYAdt7MTps47XG9U1ljGwbDmKZ0pac+pUKfNUcAjuLLGzXRzlT8TrLZDoQ OUS7DKMVN6O4SXMQhCE8OyNCSvy+d+Y8zgluDnxZbqk1nlH2Zoeia1eLW7bNdjf83ojU QezqfshzPUFE7r5oYp1Za29LgTvxWmQYwxJtY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JNSm3m9dvLahhp87l6PNAyor2QqIGjq+YSa9IjKp2KtEfUc9VSymWFMv0jBUqIWZmR Tk18KDCuJp17KEpqIDTjDx/g298mIqiFNBrf+VfPtY6ba7lbesT7wONH8+Rhnwfx5Rum ENkRPM7wBSiBEc94J+5MNoWA33y1QMYZQmpro= Received: by 10.86.92.9 with SMTP id p9mr534160fgb.15.1232127883445; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.62.11 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:44:43 +0000 From: "Tom White" To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Security Groups in Hadoop-ec2 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Tim, You can use ec2-revoke to disassociate the groups from each other, then delete the groups. In fact, the "hadoop-ec2 delete-cluster" command does exactly this. Does this solve your problem? Inheriting from a base group might be a useful enhancement - would you like to start a Jira for this? Thanks, Tom BTW questions about Hadoop on EC2 are best posted to core-user. On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Tim Hawkins wrote: > I have been playing with hadoop-ec2 (src/contrib/ec2) and have found a minor > problem > > When a cluster is launched, it creates two security groups and cross links > them, ie for cluster-name xxxx it creates EC2 security groups xxxx and > xxxx-master , the cross-linking is i believe to allow all the masters and > slaves to be able to communicate with each other. > > Unfortunately this means that the security groups are now mutually dependant > on each other, and the amazon API will no longer allow them to be deleted, > none of the GUI tools (rightscale, elasticFox, and consol.aws) or the > command-line tools seem to be able to remove the security groups either, > presumably because they too are dependant on the API. > > I believe the solution would be to create 3 security groups, not two, xxxx, > xxxx-slave and xxxx-master , and only inherit permissions from xxxx into the > other two, which would achieve the same result but be more "friendly". It > would also potentially offer the ability for multiple clusters to share base > security descriptors with other subsystems without having to open publicly > accessible holes, by allowing the name of xxxx to be set independent of the > cluster-name, allowing it to be shared as a base. > > I can make this change to the scripts and test it on our set-up, but am not > sure how to contribute the changes back to ensure that this problem does not > effect others. > > > > > From general-return-108-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jan 21 22:44:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 97781 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2009 22:44:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2009 22:44:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 2223 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2009 22:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1134 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2009 22:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1027 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2009 22:44:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:44:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.145.54.173] (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:43:55 +0000 Received: from SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com (snv-exbh01.ds.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.227.249]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id n0LMfear035186; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:41:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach: x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic:thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=EpvR7RUiZY4KFOFSB6xU0gA6sDhFikGLYntDuaXD6H8YsLNZ1uNDlqfEg/AlHfDm Received: from SNV-EXVS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com ([216.145.51.196]) by SNV-EXBH01.ds.corp.yahoo.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:41:40 -0800 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C97C19.6C833DD5" Subject: RE: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:41:38 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 Thread-Index: AclxzRWJr3aRXeNpT8mNevp3DrZJWgKTADdg References: From: "Ajay Anand" To: "core-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "general@hadoop.apache.org" <'general@hadoop.apache.org'>, "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'>, X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2009 22:41:40.0407 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D270470:01C97C19] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C97C19.6C833DD5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reminder - the Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is today at 6 pm. =20 ________________________________ From: Ajay Anand=20 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:10 PM To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; pig-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 =20 The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 21st at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. =20 Agenda: Hadoop 0.20 Overview - Sameer Paranjpye Hadoop 1.0 discussion - Sanjay Radia. =20 Please send me any other suggestions for topics for future meetings. =20 Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1478614 =20 Look forward to seeing you there! Ajay =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C97C19.6C833DD5-- From general-return-109-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jan 22 01:30:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 66263 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2009 01:30:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2009 01:30:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 94110 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2009 01:30:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94079 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2009 01:30:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94068 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2009 01:30:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of feu.teston@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:30:49 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m38so1169533waf.29 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rzotyO94rV7r7ig3RVKrehkaJUJC3qU0AgK3+0ebF/Y=; b=aemWLBIuhpah3h/NyvfeiW4q/0HZ9DMEiceM0EOh1p4CI8MUSjb1I41y/XzdFQV642 BBSELrCB5j7vUPprCY3b8JVenFmrB+0DCy0BH6WciHmJ5g4OF1sLhUNWaX0i8a6doUJQ siny4SePAhlH5bYeWyuwETms6373dX8ERatyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=x48wIII38G1WiuQzHjkLoOU2CfuU9dlHgApI+OTAUPwHhJvUS0OGWwOprmlVTpSgC7 WbE48dmJiE/VCwL52Q/fXFPZett4b77JbtyBgKqB42lCfetrHhEMPZ239kxTxwAjLevi vNdgtppeh2YbtnJGINyoS0/9cBrqviJp5c02U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.157.1 with SMTP id f1mr592425wae.221.1232587828710; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:30:28 -0200 Message-ID: <11261fa0901211730r4115ebc2wd439381d2673dc55@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 From: Feu Teston To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636456fd6af4e88046108374f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636456fd6af4e88046108374f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Guys, I wanna know if this meeting will be recorded. I'm living so far so I can't go to the meeting. But I'll appreciate if you guys can record the meeting and put this video on youtube after that. I think other people also should like that. Thanks, Feu Teston 2009/1/21 Ajay Anand > Reminder - the Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is today at 6 pm. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Ajay Anand > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:10 PM > To: 'core-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'general@hadoop.apache.org'; > 'zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org'; 'hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org'; > pig-user@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Hadoop User Group Meeting (Bay Area) 1/21 > > > > The next Bay Area Hadoop User Group meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, > January 21st at Yahoo! 2821 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Building > 1, Training Rooms 3 & 4 from 6:00-7:30 pm. > > > > Agenda: > > Hadoop 0.20 Overview - Sameer Paranjpye > > Hadoop 1.0 discussion - Sanjay Radia. > > > > Please send me any other suggestions for topics for future meetings. > > > > Registration: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1478614 > > > > Look forward to seeing you there! > > Ajay > > > > > > -- Fernando Teston http://malditoprogramadorbebado.blogspot.com/ --001636456fd6af4e88046108374f-- From general-return-110-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 27 16:36:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73724 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2009 16:36:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2009 16:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4597 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2009 16:36:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4463 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2009 16:36:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4355 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2009 16:36:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:36:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.16] (HELO QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:36:06 +0000 Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8amC1b0030SCNGk51gbJNX; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:35:18 +0000 Received: from battlerock-lm.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8gbE1b00C2SbwD53VgbHuF; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:35:43 +0000 Cc: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, core-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hive-user@hadoop.apache.org, hive-dev@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org, zookeeper-dev@yahoo-inc.com, pig-user@hadoop.apache.org, pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org, hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org Message-Id: From: Owen O'Malley To: general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--783641243 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Registration for ApacheCon Europe 2009 is now open! Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:35:12 -0800 References: <497F16FD.3090103@shanecurcuru.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1--783641243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, I'm broadcasting this to all of the Hadoop dev and users lists, =20 however, in the future I'll only send cross-subproject announcements =20 to general@hadoop.apache.org. Please subscribe over there too! It is =20 very low traffic. Anyways, ApacheCon Europe is coming up in March. There are a range =20= of Hadoop talks being given: Introduction to Hadoop by Owen O'Malley Hadoop Map/Reduce: Tuning and Debugging by Arun Murthy Pig - Making Hadoop Easy by Olga Natkovich Running Hadoop in the Cloud by Tom White Architectures for the Cloud by Steve Loughran Configuring Hadoop for Grid Services by Allen Wittenauer Dynamic Hadoop Clusters by Steve Loughran HBasics: An Introduction to Hadoop's Bid Data Database by Michael Stack Hadoop Tools and Tricks for Data Pipelines by Christophe Bisciglia Introducing Mahout: Apache Machine Learning by Grant Ingersoll -- Owen Begin forwarded message: > From: Shane Curcuru > Date: January 27, 2009 6:15:25 AM PST > Subject: [ANN] Registration for ApacheCon Europe 2009 is now open! > > PMC moderators - please forward the below to any appropriate dev@ or =20= > users@ lists so your larger community can hear about ApacheCon =20 > Europe. Remember, ACEU09 has scheduled sessions spanning the breadth =20= > of the ASF's projects, subprojects, and podlings, including at =20 > least: ActiveMQ, SerivceMix, CXF, Axis2, Hadoop, Felix, Sling, =20 > Maven, Struts, Roller, Shindig, Geronimo, Lucene, Solr, BSF, Mina, =20 > Directory, Tomcat, httpd, Mahout, Bayeux, CouchDB, AntUnit, =20 > Jackrabbit, Archiva, Wicket, POI, Pig, Synapse, Droids, Continuum. > > > ApacheCon EU 2009 registration is now open! > 23-27 March -- M=F6venpick Hotel, Amsterdam, Netherlands > http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Registration for ApacheCon Europe 2009 is now open - act before early > bird prices expire 6 February. Remember to book a room at the =20 > M=F6venpick > and use the Registration Code: Special package attendees for the > conference registration, and get 150 Euros off your full conference > registration. > > Lower Costs - Thanks to new VAT tax laws, our prices this year are 19% > lower than last year in Europe! We've also negotiated a M=F6venpick =20= > rate > of a maximum of 155 Euros per night for attendees in our room block. > > Quick Links: > > http://xrl.us/aceu09sp See the schedule > http://xrl.us/aceu09hp Get your hotel room > http://xrl.us/aceu09rp Register for the conference > > Other important notes: > > - Geeks for Geeks is a new mini-track where we can feature advanced > technical content from project committers. And our Hackathon on =20 > Monday > and Tuesday is open to all attendees - be sure to check it off in your > registration. > > - The Call for Papers for ApacheCon US 2009, held 2-6 November > 2009 in Oakland, CA, is open through 28 February, so get your > submissions in now. This ApacheCon will feature special events with > some of the ASF's original founders in celebration of the 10th > anniversary of The Apache Software Foundation. > > http://www.us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/ > > - Interested in sponsoring the ApacheCon conferences? There are =20 > plenty > of sponsor packages available - please contact Delia Frees at > delia@apachecon.com for further information. > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ApacheCon EU 2008: A week of Open Source at it's best! > > Hackathon - open to all! | Geeks for Geeks | Lunchtime Sessions > In-Depth Trainings | Multi-Track Sessions | BOFs | Business Panel > Lightning Talks | Receptions | Fast Feather Track | Expo... and more! > > - Shane Curcuru, on behalf of > Noirin Shirley, Conference Lead, > and the whole ApacheCon Europe 2009 Team > http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ 23-27 March -- Amsterdam, Netherlands > > --Apple-Mail-1--783641243-- From general-return-111-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jan 27 20:06:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8447 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2009 20:06:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2009 20:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 45512 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2009 20:06:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45483 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2009 20:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45466 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2009 20:06:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:06:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qiujie@cn.ibm.com designates 202.81.18.163 as permitted sender) Received: from [202.81.18.163] (HELO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:05:53 +0000 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.234]) by e23smtp02.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0RK4P3h027824 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:04:25 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0RK5Uxb3878922 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:05:30 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0RK5TiD028041 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:05:29 +1100 Received: from d23m0037.cn.ibm.com (d23m0037.cn.ibm.com [9.181.2.105]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0RK5Tf3028031 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:05:29 +1100 Subject: Jie Qiu is out of the office. Any urgent case, please contact Jie Yang Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Jie Qiu To: general@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:05:32 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D23M0037/23/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 01/28/2009 04:05:33 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=C7BBFFD8DFFDD8608f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBFFD8DFFDD860" Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0__=C7BBFFD8DFFDD8608f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBFFD8DFFDD860 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII I will be out of the office starting 2009-01-23 and will not return until 2009-02-03. I have limited access to notes. --0__=C7BBFFD8DFFDD8608f9e8a93df938690918cC7BBFFD8DFFDD860-- From general-return-112-apmail-hadoop-general-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jan 30 03:39:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68328 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2009 03:39:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2009 03:39:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 44866 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 03:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-general-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44681 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2009 03:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44577 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2009 03:39:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:39:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.21] (HELO mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:39:27 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.195] (snvvpn1-10-72-73-c195.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.73.195]) by mrout2-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id n0U3cknn038160; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:38:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=LmqSMoTiRdfKuEEzaRApnhyCzrndW5mfbrgZG1atTAiXsoG1ctjiHWwfVmXeuIjc Message-Id: From: Nigel Daley To: core-user@hadoop.apache.org, general@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Hadoop release 0.18.3 available Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:38:46 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Release 0.18.3 fixes many critical bugs in 0.18.2. For Hadoop release details and downloads, visit: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/releases.html Hadoop 0.18.3 Release Notes are at http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.18.3/releasenotes.html Thanks to all who contributed to this release! Nigel From common-issues-return-10872-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 01 00:34:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86749 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 00:34:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 00:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12006 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 00:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11957 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 00:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11949 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 00:34:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:34:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o910YXPe007232 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:34:34 GMT Message-ID: <8873031.489741285893273967.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:34:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6971) Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage In-Reply-To: <24019340.389891285355492616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916743#action_12916743 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6971: -------------------------------------------- +1 Looks good. Tested on 0.21 and 0.22 > Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6971.patch, HADOOP-6971.y20S.patch > > > Because of the way the structure of Hadoop's builds is done Clover can't properly detect test classes among the sources. As the result clover reports are incomplete and do not provide viral per-test coverage info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10873-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 01 07:45:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16497 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 07:45:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 07:45:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 99375 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 07:45:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99218 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 07:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99204 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 07:45:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:45:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:45:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o917jXhO015541 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:45:33 GMT Message-ID: <16099624.493351285919133235.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:45:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aniket Ray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3213) Provide Hadoop Pipes tutorial MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916814#action_12916814 ] Aniket Ray commented on HADOOP-3213: ------------------------------------ Any reasons why this won't be fixed? C++ word count is seriously lacking. > Provide Hadoop Pipes tutorial > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3213 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3213 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.16.2 > Environment: All > Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar > Assignee: Edward J. Yoon > > Hadoop pipes is a neat (and more efficient than streaming) way of writing C++ Hadoop map-reduce applications. It would be great to have a tutorial for beginners and advanced users, similar to the Java MapRed tutorial. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10874-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 01 08:45:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30744 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 08:45:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2010 08:45:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 44025 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 08:45:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43868 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2010 08:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43850 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2010 08:45:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:45:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:45:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o918jXbC016452 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:45:33 GMT Message-ID: <4921632.493901285922733320.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:45:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinay Kumar Thota (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916828#action_12916828 ] Vinay Kumar Thota commented on HADOOP-6944: ------------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10875-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 02 01:45:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53156 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 01:45:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2010 01:45:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 25756 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 01:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25653 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2010 01:45:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25645 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2010 01:45:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:45:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:45:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o921iewK002588 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:44:41 GMT Message-ID: <25023898.508571285983880790.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:44:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework In-Reply-To: <17506266.48501272420692262.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917138#action_12917138 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-6728: ----------------------------------- The code looks ok. Is it is standard to do package version in the package name for Hadoop? I prefer to have the code in *org.apache.hadoop.metrics* to avoid package version in the package name. Otherwise +1 on the patch. > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10876-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 03 07:52:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91429 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2010 07:52:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2010 07:52:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14097 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:52:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12831 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12822 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2010 07:51:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:51:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:51:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o937pXOh023635 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 07:51:33 GMT Message-ID: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 03:51:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Chris Douglas Priority: Minor The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10877-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 03 07:53:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91544 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2010 07:53:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16336 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16305 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16297 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:53:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:53:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o937rWMo023664 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 07:53:32 GMT Message-ID: <3673745.516711286092412930.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 03:53:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10878-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 03 07:53:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91597 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2010 07:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 16524 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16495 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16486 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2010 07:53:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:53:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o937rW5n023658 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 07:53:32 GMT Message-ID: <388048.516691286092412664.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 03:53:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6984-0.patch > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10879-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 04:38:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49334 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 04:38:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 04:38:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 36291 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 04:38:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35028 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 04:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34953 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 04:37:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 04:37:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 04:37:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o944bXFa016200 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 04:37:33 GMT Message-ID: <14100841.523581286167053173.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 00:37:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6971) Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage In-Reply-To: <24019340.389891285355492616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-6971. ---------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 Resolution: Fixed I have committed this to the trunk and 0.21. This chance requires Clover 3.0+ to be used for test coverage runs. > Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6971.patch, HADOOP-6971.y20S.patch > > > Because of the way the structure of Hadoop's builds is done Clover can't properly detect test classes among the sources. As the result clover reports are incomplete and do not provide viral per-test coverage info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10880-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 04:56:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53551 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 04:56:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 04:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 49649 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 04:55:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49494 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 04:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49485 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 04:55:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 04:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 04:55:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o944tXxu016439 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 04:55:33 GMT Message-ID: <27334867.523801286168133088.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 00:55:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6971) Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage In-Reply-To: <24019340.389891285355492616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6971: --------------------------------------- Release Note: This fix requires that test coverage is running under Clover 3.0+ > Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6971.patch, HADOOP-6971.y20S.patch > > > Because of the way the structure of Hadoop's builds is done Clover can't properly detect test classes among the sources. As the result clover reports are incomplete and do not provide viral per-test coverage info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10881-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 05:12:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60690 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 05:12:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 05:12:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 54203 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 05:12:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54078 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 05:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54070 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 05:11:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:11:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 05:11:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o945BYt6016776 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:11:34 GMT Message-ID: <33347710.524261286169094658.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 01:11:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6879) Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests In-Reply-To: <11760779.565921279956469755.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6879: --------------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I have just committed it. > Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Iyappan Srinivasan > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6879-ydist-security-patch.txt, HADOOP-6879.patch, HA= DOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, H= ADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, = HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y2= 0.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patc= h, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch > > > http://mvnrepository.com/ > com.jcraft =C2=BB jsch=20 > 0.1.42 version needs to be included in the build. This is needed to faci= litate implementation of some system (Herriot) testcases . > Please include this in ivy. > jsch is originally located in http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10882-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 17:23:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22450 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 17:23:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 17:23:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12569 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 17:23:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 17:23:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12514 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 17:23:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:23:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:23:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94HNXW6028132 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:23:33 GMT Message-ID: <13291892.532661286213013400.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:23:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10883-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 19:10:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80705 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 19:10:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 19:10:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 3904 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:10:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3747 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:09:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3737 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 19:09:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:09:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:09:59 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94J9c50000043 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:09:39 GMT Message-ID: <3900252.534971286219378940.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:09:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework In-Reply-To: <17506266.48501272420692262.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917714#action_12917714 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6728: --------------------------------- Hi Eric, Thanks for the +1 :) the main reason we decided to use metrics2 is that we anticipated alternative evolution paths preferred by the community (see: http://goo.gl/Rjb1 and http://goo.gl/NLLs). It looks like like old and new metrics packages are going to coexist for a while, i.e. taking the #2 path: * Port all hadoop core metrics (common, hdfs and mapreduce) to new framework. * Deprecating the old metrics package so that external package (e.g. HBase etc.) can still function (in the old way) BTW, there is already implicit versioning in hadoop as well, e.g., mapred vs mapreduce package, which I think is more confusing to (newer) people as it's not immediately clear which one is the new version. IMO, it's quite reasonable to have some package versioning scheme, when there is a coexisting period for old and new packages that are not compatible. > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10884-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 19:11:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82945 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8431 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8361 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8353 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:11:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:11:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94JBXV9000088 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:11:33 GMT Message-ID: <9521717.535011286219493458.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:11:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6984: -------------------------------- Component/s: fs Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 Assignee: Chris Douglas Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10885-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 19:11:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82996 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8585 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8377 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8362 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 19:11:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:11:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:11:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94JBYhv000095 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:11:34 GMT Message-ID: <30452980.535031286219494207.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:11:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6984: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10886-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 19:15:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84292 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 9928 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9857 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9848 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:15:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:15:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94JFXhq000171 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:15:33 GMT Message-ID: <4417221.535121286219733304.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6984: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.1) 0.22.0 > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10887-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 20:39:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14298 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 20:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 20:39:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 46448 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 20:39:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46285 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 20:39:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46277 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 20:39:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:39:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:39:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94KdWPe001534 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:39:33 GMT Message-ID: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:39:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali Priority: Minor For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi instead of # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10888-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 21:30:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35362 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 21:30:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 21:30:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 19535 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:30:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19480 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:30:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19472 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 21:30:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:30:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:30:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94LUZ3X002584 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:30:35 GMT Message-ID: <21754660.537831286227835135.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:30:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Al Thompson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917775#action_12917775 ] Al Thompson commented on HADOOP-6977: ------------------------------------- I have reviewed the patch in the most recent attachment. In doing so, it occurred to me that the for loop to search for JMX options in the HADOOP_OPTS environment variable could be simplified. This can be done by using either List.contains(..) or Arrays.binarySearch(..). The former may be preferred, as the latter requires the collection to be sorted before invoking binarySearch(). I will attach a small sample that illustrates both of these. I don't think changing this implementation will impact performance much, good or bad. IMHO the code change would result in cleaner code and provide an examplar to other committers on how not to re-implement the Java libraries in Hadoop code. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10889-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 21:34:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36804 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 21:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 21:34:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 23032 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:34:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22949 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22931 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 21:34:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:34:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:34:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94LYXIb002645 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:34:33 GMT Message-ID: <18033379.537891286228073037.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:34:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Al Thompson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Al Thompson updated HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------- Attachment: FinderTest.java A simple JUnit test which illustrates alternatives to searching for a key in a String array. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10890-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 21:36:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37382 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 21:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 21:36:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 25069 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25009 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25001 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 21:36:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:36:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:36:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94LaZ1v002683 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:36:35 GMT Message-ID: <31980992.537951286228195160.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:36:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6986) SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6986 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Affects Versions: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append The SequenceFile.Reader api should give the user an easy way to distinguish between a Network/Low-level IOE and a Parsing IOE. The use case appeared recently in the HBase project: Originally, if a RegionServer got an IOE from HDFS while opening a region file, it would abort the open and let the HMaster reassign the region. The assumption being that this is a network failure that will likely disappear at a later time or different partition of the network. However, if HBase gets parsing exceptions, we want to log the problem and continue opening the region anyways, because parsing is an idempotent problem and retries won't fix this issue. Although this problem was found in HBase, it seems to be a generic problem of being able to more easily identify idempotent vs transient errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10891-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 21:50:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44018 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 21:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 21:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 43081 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42923 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42914 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:50:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:50:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94LoYtQ002889 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:50:34 GMT Message-ID: <18686330.538171286229034539.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:50:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6986) SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE In-Reply-To: <31980992.537951286228195160.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Spiegelberg updated HADOOP-6986: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6986_0.21.patch HADOOP-6986_20-append.patch 2 patch versions: one works for 20-append branch, the 0.21 works for both 0.21 & 0.22 > SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6986 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > > Attachments: HADOOP-6986_0.21.patch, HADOOP-6986_20-append.patch > > > The SequenceFile.Reader api should give the user an easy way to distinguish between a Network/Low-level IOE and a Parsing IOE. The use case appeared recently in the HBase project: > Originally, if a RegionServer got an IOE from HDFS while opening a region file, it would abort the open and let the HMaster reassign the region. The assumption being that this is a network failure that will likely disappear at a later time or different partition of the network. However, if HBase gets parsing exceptions, we want to log the problem and continue opening the region anyways, because parsing is an idempotent problem and retries won't fix this issue. > Although this problem was found in HBase, it seems to be a generic problem of being able to more easily identify idempotent vs transient errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10892-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 22:02:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49472 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 62092 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61992 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:02:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61982 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 22:02:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:02:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:02:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94M2Za2003549 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:02:35 GMT Message-ID: <19393305.538541286229755620.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:02:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6986) SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE In-Reply-To: <31980992.537951286228195160.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917795#action_12917795 ] Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HADOOP-6986: --------------------------------------------- To fix this issue, I kept all the existing error types & messages, but I added ParseException as the cause to all parsing-related IOEs. None of the changed exceptions had an associated cause prior. This will allow us to maintain 100% backwards compatibility (in case any users were doing deep inspection of the IOE text) while allowing new users and easy way to check: if(ioe.getCause() instanceof ParseException) > SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6986 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > > Attachments: HADOOP-6986_0.21.patch, HADOOP-6986_20-append.patch > > > The SequenceFile.Reader api should give the user an easy way to distinguish between a Network/Low-level IOE and a Parsing IOE. The use case appeared recently in the HBase project: > Originally, if a RegionServer got an IOE from HDFS while opening a region file, it would abort the open and let the HMaster reassign the region. The assumption being that this is a network failure that will likely disappear at a later time or different partition of the network. However, if HBase gets parsing exceptions, we want to log the problem and continue opening the region anyways, because parsing is an idempotent problem and retries won't fix this issue. > Although this problem was found in HBase, it seems to be a generic problem of being able to more easily identify idempotent vs transient errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10893-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 22:22:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58554 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 22:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 22:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 80831 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:22:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80244 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80046 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 22:22:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:22:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:22:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94MMX96003876 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:22:33 GMT Message-ID: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:22:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Jakob Homan Assignee: Jakob Homan Fix For: 0.22.0 Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10894-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 22:27:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60507 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 22:27:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 87939 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87506 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87495 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:27:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:27:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94MRXt6003947 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:27:34 GMT Message-ID: <13381880.538971286231253687.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:27:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6897.patch Patch creates a new base class, TenSecondsTimeoutPerTest, which tests can extend to 'mix in' (as much as Java allows) this behavior. Tests extending this class will automatically be failed if their cases run more than 10 seconds, like so: {noformat} @Test public void willTimeOut() throws InterruptedException { Thread.sleep(12 * 1000); } {noformat} results in {noformat} Testcase: willTimeOut took 10.007 sec Caused an ERROR test timed out after 10000 milliseconds java.lang.Exception: test timed out after 10000 milliseconds at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method) at org.apache.hadoop.util.TestStringUtils.willTimeOut(TestStringUtils.java:45) {noformat} Tests cases need to be in JUnit 4 style to do this, and I've converted one from Core at random, to test its functionality. Most - though not all - all of the Core tests behave well, so this feature is intended more for HDFS and MR. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10895-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 22:27:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60550 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 22:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 88106 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87911 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87503 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 22:27:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:27:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:27:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94MRYfa003953 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:27:34 GMT Message-ID: <7197831.538991286231254331.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:27:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Submitting patch. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10896-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 23:28:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75991 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 23:28:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 23:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 33781 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:28:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33637 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33629 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 23:28:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:28:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:28:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94NSXtC004729 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:28:33 GMT Message-ID: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:28:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: security Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10897-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 23:56:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80489 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 48520 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48482 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48474 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94NuWje005189 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:56:33 GMT Message-ID: <31394265.540181286236592866.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:56:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6984-1.patch Collapsed CompressionTypeOption and CompressionCodecOption into a single Option type. > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10898-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 23:56:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80536 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 48736 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48656 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48548 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94NuYYj005195 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:56:34 GMT Message-ID: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:56:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TestSetFile is failing on trunk ------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Jakob Homan Fix For: 0.22.0 Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec ------------- Standard Output --------------- 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records ------------- ---------------- --------------- Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec Caused an ERROR key class or comparator option must be set java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10899-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 04 23:56:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80544 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 48762 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48667 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48658 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 23:56:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:56:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94NuYFa005204 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:56:34 GMT Message-ID: <9953465.540231286236594563.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:56:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917824#action_12917824 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6989: ------------------------------------- git bisect blames 3612cf60b989f7d9140efd3e5d2b6b13d792599f, HADOOP-6856. > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10900-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:00:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81449 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 52289 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51877 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51869 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:00:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9500X8q005262 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:00:33 GMT Message-ID: <30428642.540261286236833649.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:00:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917825#action_12917825 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6987: ------------------------------------- Not getting my hopes up about Hudson. Tests all pass except known-bad TestSetFile (HADOOP-6989). Test-patch is good: {noformat} [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile.{noformat} > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10901-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:05:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86735 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:05:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 55858 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:05:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55752 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:05:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55744 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:05:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:05:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:05:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9505XwS005337 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:05:33 GMT Message-ID: <26427040.540331286237133714.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:05:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6856) SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors In-Reply-To: <19355698.285171278691549769.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917826#action_12917826 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6856: -------------------------------------------- I wonder if all tests were executed in the light of this HADOOP-6989? > SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6856 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: h-6856.patch, h-6856.patch > > > Currently there are 2 public SequenceFile.Reader constructors, 3 public SequenceFile.Writer constructors, 9 public SequenceFile.createWriter, 2 public MapFile.Reader constructors, and 8 public MapFile.Writer constructors. All of with various historical combinations of parameters that don't cover the entire space. > All of this makes it *very* difficult to add new optional parameters to SequenceFile and MapFile. > I'd like change to the style of FileContext.create with option parameters. I'll implement one public SequenceFile.Reader constructor and one public SequenceFile.createWriter and implement all of the current variants based on those two. I'll do the same for MapFile.Reader and MapFile.Writer including passing parameters down to the underlying SequenceFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10902-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:09:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87038 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:09:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:09:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 56867 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:09:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56743 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:09:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56735 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:09:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:09:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:09:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9509Xx4005380 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:09:33 GMT Message-ID: <8558916.540381286237373087.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6989: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6989-0.patch Transcription error. {{s/keyClass/valueClass}} > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10903-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:11:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87339 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:11:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:11:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 57129 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:11:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57063 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:11:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57054 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:11:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:11:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:11:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950BXa9005409 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:11:33 GMT Message-ID: <13146942.540411286237493229.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:11:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6989: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10904-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:21:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88439 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 61771 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:21:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61642 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:21:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61634 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:21:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:21:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:21:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950LXh2005515 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:21:33 GMT Message-ID: <19644367.540481286238093364.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:21:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6977: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6977.patch Thanks Al: totally makes sense. The code looks much cleaner now. I guess I need to abandon my JDK1.1 code habits and learn how big guys are doing it nowadays. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10905-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:29:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95428 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:29:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:29:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 64082 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64023 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64015 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:29:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:29:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950TWup005590 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:29:33 GMT Message-ID: <14810559.540511286238572876.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917830#action_12917830 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------------------- I don't like unnecessary inheritance in tests. This is, in fact, why I can't stand JUnit3 ;) The solution in the patch has one more disadvantage: what if we'll have tests which shouldn't go over 10 secs, and others (i.e. true unit tests) which shouldn't exceed 2 secs? Would offered solution force us to have different implementations for different timeouts? In this particular case I'd suggest to simply annotate test cases with expected timeout as in {noformat} @Test(timeout=10000) public void testEscapeString() throws Exception { {noformat} > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10906-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:33:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96948 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:33:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:33:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 66405 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:33:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66341 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:33:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66331 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:33:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:33:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:33:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950XWRL005654 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:33:33 GMT Message-ID: <26082779.540571286238812923.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:33:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917832#action_12917832 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6989: -------------------------------------------- Shall HADOOP-6856 be reverted and reapplied with all corrections in place, considering that it already had two separate commits and this one will be #3 ? > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10907-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:43:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98534 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:43:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:43:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 71844 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71738 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:43:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71730 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:43:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:43:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:43:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950hWD9005799 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:43:33 GMT Message-ID: <2957964.540761286239412964.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:43:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917835#action_12917835 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6987: ------------------------------------- bq. I don't like unnecessary inheritance in tests. I'm not wild about them either, but one works with what one's got. bq. what if we'll have tests which shouldn't go over 10 secs, and others (i.e. true unit tests) which shouldn't exceed 2 secs The current layout in HDFS is to have separate directory trees for the integration and (currently sparsely populated) unit tests. This implies we wouldn't be commingling the two types in the same file, and this approach is predicated on that assumption. I'm ok with either approach, but if we're going to be combining types, we probably should collapse the directory trees sooner than later. If, on the other hand, we're separating unit and integration tests into different files, this approach has the advantage that one can apply the rule to an entire file with only one line (assuming the test is JUnit 4), rather than having to mark each and every test case with the same annotation. This approach thus has a smaller burden on the test writer and on any refactoring we may want to do to implement it. Also, it would be simple enough to write a script as part of test-patch to verify that all tests in /unit are so marked and thus eligible to be in the unit category (although, it also wouldn't be prohibitively difficult to write one to check each @Test annotation to include a timeout value). > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10908-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:46:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98823 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:46:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:46:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 73401 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:46:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73244 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73236 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:46:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:46:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:46:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950kXdL005841 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:46:34 GMT Message-ID: <4012406.540811286239593897.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:46:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917837#action_12917837 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6987: ------------------------------------- Also, this approach doesn't rule out the other. It just adds a convenience class that can be included, or not, as needed. Test writers could certainly not use it and annotate individual test cases, as may be appropriate. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10909-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 00:58:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2391 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 00:58:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 00:58:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 83444 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:58:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83388 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 00:58:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83380 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 00:58:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:58:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:58:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o950wWu3006005 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:58:33 GMT Message-ID: <21211285.541001286240312885.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:58:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917844#action_12917844 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------------------- Effectively, you offer to have a common class which has to be extended instead of having an explicit statement like {{@Rule public MethodRule globalTimeout = new Timeout(10 * 1000);}} in each test class which needs to have a special timeout clause. I vouch that having an explicit {{@Rule}} statement like above (if the same timeout applies for all class' cases) is clearer and doesn't require inheritance. I think it worth noting [here|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToDevelopUnitTests] about best practices of timeout settings as soon as we'll agreed on the approach. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10910-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 01:09:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8385 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 01:09:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 01:09:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 88962 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 01:09:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88888 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 01:09:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88880 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 01:09:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:09:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:09:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9519XCw006186 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:09:33 GMT Message-ID: <21436411.541171286240973271.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:09:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917848#action_12917848 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------------- I have ran {{test-patch.sh}} locally and all look Ok {noformat} +1 overall. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {noformat} Also, I used the version of Common built with this patch to run TestHL040 from HDFS-1408 and it passed. So, it seems that patch is ready to be committed to trunk. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10911-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 01:31:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11197 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 01:31:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 01:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 93875 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 01:31:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93817 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 01:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93809 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 01:31:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:31:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:31:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o951VXpB006425 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:31:34 GMT Message-ID: <33408582.541281286242293786.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:31:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6944: --------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20.3 > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10912-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 02:21:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24189 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 02:21:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 02:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 18447 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:21:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18379 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:21:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:21:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952LX6h007045 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:21:34 GMT Message-ID: <26853266.541731286245293961.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:21:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917862#action_12917862 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6944: -------------------------------------------- I have manually ran {{test-patch.sh}} to make sure that patch is Ok {noformat} +1 overall. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {noformat} > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10913-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 02:26:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24863 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 21704 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21634 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:26:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21626 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 02:26:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:26:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:26:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952QWrK007130 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:26:33 GMT Message-ID: <23983344.541871286245592779.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:26:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6990) Move TestSequenceFile from MapReduce to Common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Move TestSequenceFile from MapReduce to Common ---------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6990 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: io Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Reporter: Chris Douglas Priority: Trivial {{TestSequenceFile}} escaped from Common and ended up in the MapReduce tree, causing several regressions in {{SequenceFile}} to go unnoticed -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10914-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 02:28:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25234 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 02:28:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 02:28:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22369 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:28:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22330 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22322 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 02:28:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:28:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:28:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952SWDp007156 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:28:33 GMT Message-ID: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:28:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6991 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Chris Douglas Priority: Minor While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10915-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 02:31:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25698 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 02:31:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 02:31:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 23832 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23794 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 02:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23786 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 02:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:31:08 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952UlpV007187 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:30:48 GMT Message-ID: <23936790.541931286245847944.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 22:30:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6991-0.patch > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10916-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 05:55:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61740 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 05:55:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 05:55:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 18900 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 05:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18731 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 05:54:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18723 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 05:54:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 05:54:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 05:54:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o955sWxQ009947 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 05:54:32 GMT Message-ID: <16638636.543131286258072872.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:54:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917885#action_12917885 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6984: --------------------------------------- I really like the second iteration of the patch, but maybe we could have compress(kind) and compress(kind, codec) instead of using compress(kind, null) for the default codec. The implementation could be the same. > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10917-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 06:56:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80566 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 06:56:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 06:56:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 77541 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 06:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77386 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 06:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77374 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 06:56:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:56:05 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o956thGX010655 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:55:44 GMT Message-ID: <12688143.543351286261743972.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:55:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6989: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jakob Homan Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Jakob. > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10918-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 07:01:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81855 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 07:01:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 07:01:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 79749 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79581 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79554 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 07:00:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:00:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9570aAo010734 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:00:36 GMT Message-ID: <2444265.543401286262036567.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 03:00:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-6989: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Chris Douglas (was: Jakob Homan) > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10919-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 07:15:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87840 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 07:15:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 88338 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88180 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88164 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 07:14:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:14:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:14:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o957EZkh010936 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:14:35 GMT Message-ID: <6005029.543511286262875372.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 03:14:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917891#action_12917891 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------------ This seems like a great way to inject tokens into a process that it shouldn't have. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10920-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 07:15:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87888 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 07:15:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 88408 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88205 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 07:15:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88167 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 07:14:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:14:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:14:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o957Ea6p010942 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:14:36 GMT Message-ID: <12579599.543531286262876266.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 03:14:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6984-2.patch *nod* That does look cleaner. > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10921-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 10:25:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47429 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 10:24:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 10:24:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 77303 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 10:24:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77114 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 10:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77101 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 10:24:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:24:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:24:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95AOZbt014005 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:24:35 GMT Message-ID: <13421409.545261286274275135.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:24:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations In-Reply-To: <29776327.15071282855734948.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- Attachment: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch Patch for review. This allows to pass Security information via Avro tunnel to Hadoop RPC. Adds tests to Avro RPC (for reflect and specific). > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10922-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 16:09:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21547 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 16:09:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 16:09:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3240 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 16:09:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3072 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 16:09:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3061 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 16:09:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:09:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:09:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95G9Xeo019595 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:09:34 GMT Message-ID: <1218449.549741286294973883.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:09:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918042#action_12918042 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------------ At a minimum, -1 on the environment variable. Shouldn't HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS be sufficient for passing extra -D params? We have an abundance of environment variables that users can't handle as it is. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10923-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 16:22:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25533 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 16:22:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 16:22:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33757 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 16:22:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33713 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 16:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33705 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 16:22:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:22:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:22:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95GMa5K019887 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:22:36 GMT Message-ID: <19303087.550171286295756399.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:22:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918053#action_12918053 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6988: ---------------------------------------- Thanks for the comments, Allen. The environment variable already exists in hadoop trunk; it's just only capable of specifying a single path to a token file. I'd like to be able to specify multiple token files via this variable. This is really only for convenience, as it's entirely possible to stuff multiple delegation token objects into a single credentials object, which is then serialized to a file. I considered creating a tool which would be capable of merging multiple delegation token files into one, but this seemed like a cleaner solution. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10924-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 17:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34121 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 17:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 17:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 80327 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 17:01:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80263 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 17:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80253 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 17:01:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:01:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:01:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95H1Y0t020626 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:01:34 GMT Message-ID: <4517390.550981286298094812.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:01:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918073#action_12918073 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------------ Grr. I really wish we'd stop creating pet environment variables. This is ridiculous. Can we remove this env var as part of this JIRA? What takes precendence the env var or the mapreduce.job.credentials.binary jobconf setting? What is the interaction? If the answer is "we have to look at the code" then we've failed. It makes much more sense to have mapreduce.job.credentials.binary to support a comma delimited set (to be consistent with the rest of the job conf. Never mind that colon is the traditional directory delimiter on OS X.) > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10925-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 18:04:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59831 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 55977 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55884 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 18:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55876 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 18:04:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:04:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:04:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95I4XZ7021780 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:04:33 GMT Message-ID: <31885092.552181286301873315.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:04:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6984-3.patch Merge with trunk > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch, 6984-3.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10926-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 18:38:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85640 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 18:38:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 18:38:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 10105 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 18:38:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10050 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 18:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10042 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 18:38:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:38:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:38:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95IbtnA022473 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:37:55 GMT Message-ID: <20611797.553111286303875137.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:37:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 6991-1.patch Patch on top of HADOOP-6984 > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10927-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 20:13:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59942 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 20:13:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 20:13:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 69528 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 20:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69398 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 20:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69389 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 20:12:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:12:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:12:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95KCZwY024061 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:12:35 GMT Message-ID: <23895502.554711286309555842.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:12:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918145#action_12918145 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6988: --------------------------------------- The environment variable should *not* be multi-valued. It is used to communicate the job's token store to sub-processes of the task. Since a task can't be in more than one job, there isn't any need. What is the use case for having multiple token files? The rest of the lists use commas, so this should be the same. Wouldn't it be easier to write a tool that allows you to combine multiple token files together into a single one? > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10928-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 22:02:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12639 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 22:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 26694 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26640 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26632 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95M2XZp026839 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 22:02:33 GMT Message-ID: <32187961.559881286316153481.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:02:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6969) CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. In-Reply-To: <12538682.369991285269513067.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White resolved HADOOP-6969. ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed I've fixed this. > CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6969 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: CHANGES.txt should show the release date for 0.21.0 and include section for for 0.21.1 - Unreleased. Latest changes, that did not make into 0.21.0, should be moved under 0.21.1 section. > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10929-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 23:17:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46417 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 23:17:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 23:17:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 16636 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 23:17:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16555 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 23:17:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16547 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 23:16:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:16:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:16:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95NGZ0N028475 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:16:36 GMT Message-ID: <28234767.562781286320595762.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:16:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6356) Add a Cache for AbstractFileSystem in the new FileContext/AbstractFileSystem framework. In-Reply-To: <2126828437.1257203939433.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918313#action_12918313 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6356: -------------------------------------- Dhruba says > I think it is appropriate to do the compatible-version-check for each RPC instead of doing it per creation-of-FileSystem object. Having a FileSystem cache => RPCProxy is also cached => version check is done once per file system object. Dhruba is right in that this is incorrect since the NN may reboot with a different version. However we will see a more serious performance problem with FileContext under certain usage patterns. FileContext keeps a pointer to the default file system; hence all file operations to the default filesystem will not require a version check (but it is susceptible to the NN reboot with different verison problem). However operations to other file systems such as fc.open("hdfs://nn/foo/bar) will create a new AbstractFileSystem object that will then create a new dfsClient which will create a new rpcProxy which will do a getVersion() - this is an extra round trip. Good news is that the connection at the lowest layer is cached. We can fix this by having each rpc call also piggy back the version number so that the version check is not needed when a proxy is created. This however will break wire compatibility. > Add a Cache for AbstractFileSystem in the new FileContext/AbstractFileSystem framework. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The new filesystem framework, FileContext and AbstractFileSystem does not implement a cache for AbstractFileSystem. > This Jira proposes to add a cache to the new framework just like with the old FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10930-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 05 23:20:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46947 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 23:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 23:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21485 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 23:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21457 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 23:20:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21449 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 23:20:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:20:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:20:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95NKYwc028537 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:20:35 GMT Message-ID: <3118408.562871286320834965.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:20:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6356) Add a Cache for AbstractFileSystem in the new FileContext/AbstractFileSystem framework. In-Reply-To: <2126828437.1257203939433.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918314#action_12918314 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6356: -------------------------------------- We could add a cache at the rpcProxy layer. This will avoid the extra round trip for FileContext operations to a file system other then the default filesystem. However the current bug of where the NN reboots with the different version will remain. > Add a Cache for AbstractFileSystem in the new FileContext/AbstractFileSystem framework. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The new filesystem framework, FileContext and AbstractFileSystem does not implement a cache for AbstractFileSystem. > This Jira proposes to add a cache to the new framework just like with the old FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10931-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 01:10:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92854 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 01:10:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 01:10:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10629 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:10:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10520 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:10:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10512 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 01:10:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:10:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:10:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o961AYWB000461 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 01:10:34 GMT Message-ID: <12731626.565251286327434588.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 21:10:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918368#action_12918368 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6988: ---------------------------------------- Allen: I agree with Owen - it doesn't make sense to remove this environment variable. It is primarily used internally, though its use is documented in hdfs_user_guide.xml and mapred_tutorial.xml. The interaction between this and the conf var is that all tokens specified via either method are added to a single credentials object - nothing's going to take precedence. Owen: the motivation for this change is not with regard to passing delegation tokens from job to tasks, but rather with submitting jobs in the first place, which is another use for HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION. I'd like to be able to specify multiple tokens (gotten from fetchdt, or via other means) which a job could use to, for example, authenticate to multiple NNs and JTs. I considered creating a tool which would be capable of merging multiple delegation token files into one, but this seemed like a cleaner solution. Good point on making this comma-separated. I'll definitely do that. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10932-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 01:40:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2086 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 01:40:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 01:40:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27224 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27194 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:40:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27186 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 01:40:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:40:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:40:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o961eWqW001068 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 01:40:32 GMT Message-ID: <21563065.541286329232015.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 21:40:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918379#action_12918379 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6988: -------------------------------------------- PLEASE, DO NOT REMOVE THIS VARIABLE: Oozie relies on this variable to be able to dispatch mapreduce/streaming/pipes/pig/hive/sqoop actions. Oozie uses a launcher MR job to start all those action types. This launcher MR job uses the variable to propagate the delegation token to the code that launches the corresponding action. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10933-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 03:05:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38476 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 03:04:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 03:04:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 90988 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 03:04:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90729 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 03:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90720 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 03:04:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:04:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:04:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9634WwH005515 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 03:04:33 GMT Message-ID: <2058929.1211286334272837.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:04:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-6988: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6988.0.txt Adding support for HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION being interpreted as a comma-separated list of paths to delegation token files. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10934-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 03:14:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47352 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 03:14:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 03:14:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 4707 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 03:14:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4432 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 03:14:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4416 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 03:14:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:14:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:14:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o963EVW5007481 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 03:14:32 GMT Message-ID: <15331317.1311286334871862.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:14:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-6988: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6988.1.txt Same patch, this time with -p0. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10935-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 04:22:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78894 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 04:22:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 04:22:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 68843 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:22:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68690 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:21:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68676 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 04:21:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:21:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:21:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o964LWuL014217 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:21:32 GMT Message-ID: <6973099.1771286338892414.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:21:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6895) Native Libraries do not load if a different platform signature is returned from org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName In-Reply-To: <8210696.123741280779279985.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918412#action_12918412 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6895: ----------------------------------- +1 looks good to me. It's worth adding a comment in the file which explains why this is needed. Same for HADOOP-6923. > Native Libraries do not load if a different platform signature is returned from org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6895 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6895 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Environment: SLES 10, IBM Java 6, Hadoop 0.21.0-rc0 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6895.patch > > Original Estimate: 0h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > bin/hadoop-config.sh has an environment variable called JAVA_PLATFORM which is set to to the results returned by org.apache.hadoop.util.PlatformName . These results are sometimes unique to the JRE being used. Although the value returned for 64 Bit Sun/Oracle Java and 64 Bit IBM Java is the same, it is different for the corresponding 32 Bit JREs. > The issue is that the value returned is used in creating the path to the native libraries on disk, i.e ${HADOOP_COMMON_HOME}/lib/native/${JAVA_PLATFORM} > Since the path on disk is fixed with the Sun JRE value /lib/native/Linux-i386-32 it therefore fails when it attempts to load the native libraries with the value returned with 32 Bit IBM Java, /lib/native/Linux-x86-32 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10936-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 04:33:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80566 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 04:33:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 04:33:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 78439 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:33:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78282 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:33:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78274 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 04:33:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:33:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:33:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o964XYe3014388 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:33:34 GMT Message-ID: <4112371.1981286339614467.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:33:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java In-Reply-To: <20695342.63471283897793901.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6941: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10937-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 04:39:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81357 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 04:39:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 04:39:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 86985 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:39:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86872 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86864 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:39:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o964dVPN014461 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:39:31 GMT Message-ID: <10502408.2021286339971154.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:39:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918415#action_12918415 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6954: ----------------------------------- I'd like to commit this unless there are any objections. > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10938-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 04:47:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82384 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 04:47:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 04:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 91797 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91646 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 04:47:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91636 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 04:47:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:47:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:47:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o964lWSB014612 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 04:47:32 GMT Message-ID: <10436909.2261286340452823.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:47:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918419#action_12918419 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------------ I'm sorry, but it is completely short sighted to have a single use env var like this. If we need to modify the tasks environment for something else, are we going to introduce another environment variable? How many are too many? > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10939-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 06:19:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7276 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 06:19:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 48682 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48577 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48569 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:19:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:19:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o966JVJM015870 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:19:31 GMT Message-ID: <30631831.2791286345971699.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:19:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) This looks great. It passes unit tests. I just committed this. Thanks, Chris! > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch, 6984-3.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10940-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 06:19:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7334 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 06:19:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 48799 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48773 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48765 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 06:19:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:19:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:19:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o966JY4A015883 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:19:34 GMT Message-ID: <22821360.2831286345974138.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:19:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6984: ---------------------------------- Component/s: (was: fs) io > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch, 6984-3.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10941-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 17:25:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27682 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 17:25:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 17:25:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 40233 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 17:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40155 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 17:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40147 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 17:25:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:25:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:25:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96HPVgD010425 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:25:31 GMT Message-ID: <21352235.10671286385931110.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:25:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10942-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 20:05:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85771 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 20:05:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 20:05:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 44573 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 20:05:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44539 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 20:05:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44530 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 20:05:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:05:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:05:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96K5Wc8013102 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:05:32 GMT Message-ID: <24562186.13231286395532223.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:05:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918648#action_12918648 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------- Being able to specify both MR and HDFS delegation token files upfront when submitting a job seems reasonable, avoids requiring all clients kinit or use a tool to merge token files. Env variable philosophy aside (Allen, want to open a jira with an alternative?) does anyone object to modifying this existing variable so more than one file can be specified? > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10943-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 21:28:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11605 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 21:28:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 21:28:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 54268 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 21:28:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54228 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 21:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54220 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 21:28:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:28:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:28:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96LSWow014631 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:28:32 GMT Message-ID: <24758682.15361286400512441.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:28:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nicolas Spiegelberg (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6986) SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE In-Reply-To: <31980992.537951286228195160.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicolas Spiegelberg updated HADOOP-6986: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > SequenceFile.Reader should distinguish between Network IOE and Parsing IOE > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6986 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6986 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.20-append > > Attachments: HADOOP-6986_0.21.patch, HADOOP-6986_20-append.patch > > > The SequenceFile.Reader api should give the user an easy way to distinguish between a Network/Low-level IOE and a Parsing IOE. The use case appeared recently in the HBase project: > Originally, if a RegionServer got an IOE from HDFS while opening a region file, it would abort the open and let the HMaster reassign the region. The assumption being that this is a network failure that will likely disappear at a later time or different partition of the network. However, if HBase gets parsing exceptions, we want to log the problem and continue opening the region anyways, because parsing is an idempotent problem and retries won't fix this issue. > Although this problem was found in HBase, it seems to be a generic problem of being able to more easily identify idempotent vs transient errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10944-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 22:44:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37443 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 22:44:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 22:44:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 67976 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 22:44:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67837 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 22:44:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67829 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 22:44:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:44:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:44:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96MiWSg015739 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:44:32 GMT Message-ID: <20906155.16341286405072485.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:44:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6916) Implement append operation for S3FileSystem In-Reply-To: <6991431.365871281969257661.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6916: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) > Implement append operation for S3FileSystem > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6916 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Oleg Aleshko > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: s3_append1.patch > > > Currently org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem#append throws an IOException("Not supported"); > S3FileSystem should be able to support appending, possibly via common block storage logic. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10945-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 23:02:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39677 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 23:02:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 23:02:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 80203 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:02:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80145 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80135 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 23:02:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:02:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:02:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96N2VQ4015982 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:02:31 GMT Message-ID: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:02:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Update website for recent subproject departures ----------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6992 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: site Reporter: Doug Cutting Assignee: Doug Cutting Fix For: site A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10946-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 23:04:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40140 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 85450 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:04:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85104 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85053 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 23:04:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:04:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:04:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96N4W86016057 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:04:32 GMT Message-ID: <8661907.16561286406272393.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:04:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6992: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6992.patch Here's a patch that: - removes tabs for non-subprojects - moves former sub-projects to the related-projects nav menu - adds a related project listing to content of the front page - updates the list of PMC members - adds redirects for former subprojects to their new homes > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10947-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 23:14:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46124 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 23:14:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 23:14:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 95698 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:14:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95632 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:14:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95624 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 23:14:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:14:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:14:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96NEYLN016281 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:14:35 GMT Message-ID: <28209305.16831286406874960.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:14:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6916) Implement append operation for S3FileSystem In-Reply-To: <6991431.365871281969257661.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918729#action_12918729 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6916: ------------------------------------- Hey Oleg, * Doesn't pos and filePos need to be updated when opening for append? * Doesn't S3OutputStream#setBlocks need to be synchronized? Why does it copy the blocks? * Make sure the unit tests exercise calling close after append. * Have you tested this on S3? eg by setting test.fs.s3.name in src/test/core-site.xml? Hudson currently running, please use ant test-patch from an svn checkout. Thanks, Eli > Implement append operation for S3FileSystem > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6916 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Oleg Aleshko > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: s3_append1.patch > > > Currently org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem#append throws an IOException("Not supported"); > S3FileSystem should be able to support appending, possibly via common block storage logic. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10948-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 06 23:26:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48239 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 23:26:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 23:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3536 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3381 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 23:26:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3373 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 23:26:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:26:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:26:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o96NQXcg016417 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 23:26:33 GMT Message-ID: <17409998.16911286407592979.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:26:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6916) Implement append operation for S3FileSystem In-Reply-To: <6991431.365871281969257661.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918731#action_12918731 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6916: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention this could use some additional tests, eg appending to a file already open for append, appending more than a block, etc. See the hdfs append tests for additional ideas. > Implement append operation for S3FileSystem > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6916 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Oleg Aleshko > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: s3_append1.patch > > > Currently org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem#append throws an IOException("Not supported"); > S3FileSystem should be able to support appending, possibly via common block storage logic. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10949-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 00:51:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73682 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 00:51:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 00:51:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60231 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 00:51:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60173 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 00:51:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60165 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 00:51:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:51:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:51:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o970pW3a017566 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:51:32 GMT Message-ID: <31243551.18031286412692617.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:51:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D129= 18751#action_12918751 ]=20 Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------- # I looked at HADOOP-6977.patch. Overall I think it is good. One concern = that I had was that in the methods of=20 -- getJmxPortNumber()=20 and -- isJmxEnabled() ,=20 "HADOOP_OPTS" was hard-coded and searched. =20 This require us to enable remote JMX by putting all the JMX options into HA= DOOP_OPTS. In fact, we can enable JMX ( with specific port number ) by mod= ifying command specific options, e.g. # Command specific options appended to HADOOP_OPTS when specified export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAMEN= ODE_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8004=E2=80=B3 export HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HAD= OOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8005=E2=80= =B3 export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_DATAN= ODE_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8006=E2=80=B3 export HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_BALAN= CER_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8007=E2=80=B3 export HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_JOB= TRACKER_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8008=E2=80=B3 export HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D800= 9=E2=80=B3 There is also a typo /**=20 Create connection with the remove JMX server at given host and port I believe you mean remote but not remove? # FinderTest.java This test should be refactor to follow Junit 4 ? > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patc= h, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.j= sp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the ad= dition of some way to channel metics information. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10950-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 04:18:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31961 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 04:18:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 04:18:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 78454 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 04:18:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77237 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 04:18:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77220 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 04:18:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:18:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:18:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o974IWST020582 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 04:18:32 GMT Message-ID: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:18:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Broken link on cluster setup page of docs ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6993 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: documentation Reporter: Aaron T. Myers The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: {quote} http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html {quote} but it should be: {quote} http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10951-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 04:54:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41665 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 04:54:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 04:54:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 99404 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 04:54:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99244 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 04:54:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99236 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 04:54:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:54:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:54:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o974sVBg021019 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 04:54:32 GMT Message-ID: <12867933.19861286427271956.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:54:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918786#action_12918786 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------------- bq. In fact, we can enable JMX ( with specific port number ) by modifying command specific options I think this is valid and I'll make the change to look for JMX specific parameters in a daemon specific options (i.e. HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS) as well as in HADOOP_OPTS. That should cover all the bases. Typo: check, good catch. FinderTest was an example of loops optimization and isn't a part of the patch. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10952-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 05:56:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54394 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 05:56:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 05:56:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 42980 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 05:56:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42883 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 05:56:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42249 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 05:56:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:56:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:56:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o975uWms021924 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:56:33 GMT Message-ID: <18921037.20601286430992803.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:56:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918792#action_12918792 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6992: --------------------------------------- It looks good, except that we need to wait for their new web site to be up before we redirect their current url to it. > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10953-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 05:58:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55006 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 05:58:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 05:58:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 44481 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 05:58:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44448 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 05:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44440 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 05:58:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:58:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:58:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o975wVG3021956 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:58:31 GMT Message-ID: <23806310.20641286431111196.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 01:58:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6993: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 0.21.1 Assignee: Eli Collins Issue Type: Bug (was: Task) > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10954-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 06:00:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55536 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 06:00:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 06:00:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 46168 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 06:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46014 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 06:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46001 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 06:00:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:00:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:00:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9760Wnc022004 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 06:00:32 GMT Message-ID: <24823572.20671286431232241.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 02:00:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6993: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6993-22-1.patch hadoop-6993-21-1.patch Thanks Aaron. Patches for 21 and similar issue on trunk attached. > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10955-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 06:08:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60538 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 06:08:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 06:08:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 48228 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 06:08:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47448 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 06:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47004 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 06:08:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:08:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9768VdB022109 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 06:08:32 GMT Message-ID: <2269008.20701286431711879.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 02:08:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918794#action_12918794 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6993: ------------------------------------- Verified the links are fixed in the generated docs. > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10956-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 16:02:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68327 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 16:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 16:02:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 39225 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 16:02:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39139 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 16:02:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39131 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 16:02:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:02:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:02:03 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97G1gsO001406 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:01:42 GMT Message-ID: <25530780.26661286467302150.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:01:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918951#action_12918951 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------------------- I had an offline conversation with Jakob about this and he expressed that the approach is about to enforce max time of a true unit test execution. Unit tests are clearly suppose to be very short. I still have a couple comments about this: - let's call class {{UnitTestTimeLimit}} rather then {{TenSecondsTimeoutPerTest}} to make it more generic - let's make timeout to be a constant and move it to a config or util class - let's update [Unit test page|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToDevelopUnitTests] - as we are going to establish a precedent for setting rules of engagement I'd suggest to update HADOOP-6399 with that rule > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10957-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 16:28:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78567 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 16:28:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 16:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 69345 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 16:28:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69308 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 16:28:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69300 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 16:28:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:28:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:28:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97GSVWE001811 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:28:32 GMT Message-ID: <17445785.26961286468911653.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:28:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918960#action_12918960 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6992: -------------------------------------- > we need to wait for their new web site to be up Indeed. Pig's is up, although it's still branded as a Hadoop subproject. Hive got their virtual host configured yesterday but has not yet put any content at hive.apache.org, so that's currently the gating factor. Once that happens, I'll commit this. > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10958-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 17:33:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24010 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 17:33:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 17:33:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 71354 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:33:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71313 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:33:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71305 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 17:33:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:33:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:33:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97HXWI8002898 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:33:32 GMT Message-ID: <23017183.27881286472812026.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:33:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918985#action_12918985 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6992: --------------------------------------- Alan asked for me to commit the redirect for pig now, so I committed that part of the patch. > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10959-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 17:47:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32524 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 17:47:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 17:47:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 89922 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:47:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89875 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:47:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89867 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 17:47:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:47:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:47:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97HlVf7003112 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:47:31 GMT Message-ID: <18413578.28061286473651317.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:47:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12918987#action_12918987 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6993: ----------------------------------- +1 > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10960-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 17:55:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36328 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 17:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 17:55:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 98838 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:55:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98800 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 17:55:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98792 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 17:55:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:55:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:55:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97HtVED003221 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:55:31 GMT Message-ID: <2997551.28151286474131924.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:55:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-6993. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Thanks Tom. I've committed this to trunk and 21. > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10961-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 18:25:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61679 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 29584 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29530 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:25:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29522 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 18:25:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:25:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:25:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97IPWCA003737 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:25:32 GMT Message-ID: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:25:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6994) Api in FileContext to get delegation tokens. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Api in FileContext to get delegation tokens. -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6994 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey APIs to get delegation tokens is required in FileContext. A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens would be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. This jira will also add an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path which could be more than one for symlinks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10962-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 18:29:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64419 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 37083 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37054 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37031 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:29:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:29:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97ITVUJ003837 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:29:32 GMT Message-ID: <28608338.28881286476171947.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:29:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6994) Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem In-Reply-To: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6994: ----------------------------------------- Description: APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. was:APIs to get delegation tokens is required in FileContext. A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens would be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. This jira will also add an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path which could be more than one for symlinks. Summary: Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem (was: Api in FileContext to get delegation tokens.) > Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > > APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. > A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10963-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 18:29:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64462 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 37263 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37231 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37223 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 18:29:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:29:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97ITWUL003849 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:29:32 GMT Message-ID: <14648928.28921286476172957.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6992: ---------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-tlp.pdf For those that don't want to run forrest, here is what the front page would look like. > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch, hadoop-tlp.pdf > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10964-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 18:34:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69018 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 18:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 18:34:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 42457 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42414 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42406 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 18:34:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:34:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:34:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97IYV4o003978 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:34:31 GMT Message-ID: <19247321.28991286476471616.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:34:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6994) Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem In-Reply-To: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6994: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6994.1.patch > Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6994.1.patch > > > APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. > A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10965-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 18:44:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74927 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 18:44:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 18:44:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 47804 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:44:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47672 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 18:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47664 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 18:44:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:44:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:44:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97IiVTZ004114 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:44:31 GMT Message-ID: <25747659.29151286477071733.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:44:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6994) Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem In-Reply-To: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919012#action_12919012 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6994: ----------------------------------- The new methods on AbstractFileSystem are public, yet Token and AbstractDelegationTokenIdentifier are LimitedPrivate, which seems inconsistent. > Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6994.1.patch > > > APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. > A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10966-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 19:10:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96510 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 90709 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90675 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90667 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 19:10:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:10:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:10:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97JAXwY004643 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:10:33 GMT Message-ID: <14244057.29781286478633154.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:10:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6933) TestListFiles is flaky In-Reply-To: <14615079.42351282946633507.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919024#action_12919024 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6933: ----------------------------------- Result of test-patch: {noformat} [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. [exec] {noformat} > TestListFiles is flaky > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6933.txt > > > TestListFiles assumes a particular order of the files returned by the directory iterator. There's no such guarantee made by the underlying API, so the test fails on some hosts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10967-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 19:12:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97799 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 19:12:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 95287 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95258 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95250 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97JCWeg004698 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:12:32 GMT Message-ID: <15255434.29841286478752790.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:12:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6994) Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem In-Reply-To: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919026#action_12919026 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6994: ------------------------------------- bq. The new methods on AbstractFileSystem are public, yet Token and AbstractDelegationTokenIdentifier are LimitedPrivate, which seems inconsistent. I also have this concern, particularly in regard to HADOOP-6988. > Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6994.1.patch > > > APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. > A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10968-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 19:12:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97884 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 95655 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95627 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95619 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97JCYrF004720 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:12:34 GMT Message-ID: <15559596.29911286478754648.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:12:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6933) TestListFiles is flaky In-Reply-To: <14615079.42351282946633507.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6933: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks, Todd! > TestListFiles is flaky > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6933.txt > > > TestListFiles assumes a particular order of the files returned by the directory iterator. There's no such guarantee made by the underlying API, so the test fails on some hosts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10969-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 19:46:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15889 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 19:46:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 19:46:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 33499 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33392 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 19:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33383 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 19:46:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:46:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:46:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97JkVFp005177 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:46:32 GMT Message-ID: <20830868.30251286480791796.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:46:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6987-2.patch Updated patch with Cos' suggestion. There's not really a util class to put the value in, so it's now a final field on the rule class. I'll update the unit test guidelines when the patch is committed. I've linked this JIRA to HADOOP-6399. Once this is committed, I'll open an HDFS JIRA to tag the tests currently in the unit directory. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch, HADOOP-6987-2.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10970-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 22:00:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91061 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 22:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 22:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19729 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19696 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19688 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 22:00:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:00:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:00:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97M0bED007201 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:00:37 GMT Message-ID: <13456585.32211286488837249.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:00:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919078#action_12919078 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6988: --------------------------------------- The intent of the environment variable is *not* for job submission. I really don't see any value in making it multi-valued. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10971-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 22:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98922 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 47072 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47008 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46587 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 22:22:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:22:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:22:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97MMVvo007532 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:22:32 GMT Message-ID: <8155666.32571286490151977.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:22:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919082#action_12919082 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6988: ---------------------------------------- Even if it's not intended for job submission, it's documented as being the preferred way to pass token files to bin/hadoop for the purpose of running HDFS commands. >From the HDFS user guide: {quote} The HDFS fetchdt command is not a Hadoop shell command. It can be run as 'bin/hadoop fetchdt DTfile'. After you got the token you can run an HDFS command without having Kerberos tickets, by pointing HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environmental variable to the delegation token file. {quote} Thus, this change could be useful for any HDFS command which is capable of communicating with multiple distinct NNs. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10972-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 22:37:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2681 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 22:37:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 22:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 71729 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:37:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71673 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71665 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 22:37:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:37:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:37:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97MbVIY007751 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:37:31 GMT Message-ID: <28126371.32871286491051402.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:37:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6994) Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem In-Reply-To: <6593025.28721286475932719.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6994: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6994.2.patch New patch addressing the comment. The InterfaceAudience for the new APIs are annotated to be LimitedPrivate. The getDelegationToken API in FileSystem is also changed to LimitedPrivate. > Api to get delegation token in AbstractFileSystem > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6994 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6994.1.patch, HADOOP-6994.2.patch > > > APIs to get delegation tokens is required in AbstractFileSystem. AbstractFileSystems are accessed via file context therefore an API to get list of AbstractFileSystems accessed in a path is also needed. > A path may refer to several file systems and delegation tokens could be needed for many of them for a client to be able to successfully access the path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10973-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 07 23:04:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7475 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 88829 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88793 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88785 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 23:04:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:04:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:04:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o97N4XFK008301 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 23:04:33 GMT Message-ID: <16164275.33651286492673006.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 19:04:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919096#action_12919096 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------------------- +1 patch looks good. I have ran it with latest trunk and it seems to be doing the job. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch, HADOOP-6987-2.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10974-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 06:11:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48253 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 06:11:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 06:11:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 82637 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:11:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82594 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82579 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 06:11:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:11:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:11:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o986BV1W014335 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 06:11:31 GMT Message-ID: <29275260.37121286518291556.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 02:11:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6995) Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6995 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: security Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor There are some cases where the full tightness of the ProxyUsers configuration is not required or available -- for example, not all users of oozie may share a common "oozie-users" group, and the operators would prefer to allow oozie on a given host to act proxy for any user. We should allow the operator to specify a wildcard for hosts or groups in the proxyuser configurations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10975-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 06:13:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48462 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 06:13:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 06:13:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 84036 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:13:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84000 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:13:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83991 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 06:13:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:13:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:13:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o986DUSr014360 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 06:13:31 GMT Message-ID: <4097627.37151286518410976.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 02:13:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6995) Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations In-Reply-To: <29275260.37121286518291556.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6995: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6995-branch20.txt For 0.20S, not for commit. > Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6995 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6995-branch20.txt > > > There are some cases where the full tightness of the ProxyUsers configuration is not required or available -- for example, not all users of oozie may share a common "oozie-users" group, and the operators would prefer to allow oozie on a given host to act proxy for any user. We should allow the operator to specify a wildcard for hosts or groups in the proxyuser configurations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10976-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 06:17:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49187 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 06:17:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 06:17:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 86524 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:17:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86383 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:17:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86374 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 06:17:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:17:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:17:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o986HVDI014409 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 06:17:31 GMT Message-ID: <5801938.37191286518651409.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 02:17:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6995) Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations In-Reply-To: <29275260.37121286518291556.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6995: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6995.txt Patch for trunk > Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6995 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6995-branch20.txt, hadoop-6995.txt > > > There are some cases where the full tightness of the ProxyUsers configuration is not required or available -- for example, not all users of oozie may share a common "oozie-users" group, and the operators would prefer to allow oozie on a given host to act proxy for any user. We should allow the operator to specify a wildcard for hosts or groups in the proxyuser configurations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10977-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 06:18:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49314 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 06:18:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 06:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 86741 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:18:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86693 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 06:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86685 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 06:17:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:17:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:17:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o986HVd2014415 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 06:17:31 GMT Message-ID: <29679466.37211286518651745.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 02:17:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6995) Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations In-Reply-To: <29275260.37121286518291556.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6995: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow wildcards to be used in ProxyUsers configurations > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6995 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6995 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6995-branch20.txt, hadoop-6995.txt > > > There are some cases where the full tightness of the ProxyUsers configuration is not required or available -- for example, not all users of oozie may share a common "oozie-users" group, and the operators would prefer to allow oozie on a given host to act proxy for any user. We should allow the operator to specify a wildcard for hosts or groups in the proxyuser configurations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10978-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 07:20:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72510 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 07:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 07:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 29893 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29739 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29731 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 07:20:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:20:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:20:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o987KWOR015220 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:20:32 GMT Message-ID: <33340944.37721286522432215.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:20:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919181#action_12919181 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6988: ------------------------------------- Although it is true that HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION can be used to make normal hdfs commands work, the intent for having this was to support security for Map/Reduce tasks, and, hadoop streaming apps that internally invoke command-line hdfs operations (as Owen had pointed out earlier). If you want to pass multiple tokens during job submission, the preferred approach would be to write the tokens into a file (using the Credentials class's utilities), and then point mapreduce.job.credentials.binary to that file. Thinking about it, wouldn't the option of defining mapreduce.job.hdfs-servers in the job configuration work for you. The JobClient will automatically get delegation tokens from those namenodes and all tasks of the job can use those tokens.. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10979-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 07:51:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77800 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 07:51:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 07:51:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59357 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59279 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:51:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59259 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 07:51:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:51:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:51:02 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o987oeYx015705 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:50:40 GMT Message-ID: <2461564.38101286524240563.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:50:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Volodymyr Orlov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin In-Reply-To: <3999817.74761274049343093.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Volodymyr Orlov updated HADOOP-6767: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz Hi, After a pause I am continuing my work on porting Hadoop for Windows. In the attached archive I've added batch scripts for running Hadoop on Windows, made small changes to build.xml file to be able to build on Windows and added batch files and Apache Commons Daemon configuration files to run Hadoop as Windows services. All changes are against trunk Best Regards, Vladimir > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, filecache, fs, io, scripts, security, test, util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz, HADOOP-6767.patch > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10980-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 07:53:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78135 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 07:53:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 07:53:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 60406 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:53:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60385 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 07:53:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60377 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 07:53:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:53:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:53:19 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o987qxfE015783 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:52:59 GMT Message-ID: <33515070.38261286524379575.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:52:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "Volodymyr Orlov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin In-Reply-To: <3999817.74761274049343093.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Volodymyr Orlov updated HADOOP-6767: ------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: security) (was: filecache) (was: test) (was: util) (was: fs) (was: io) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) 0.22.0 Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.3) 0.22.0 > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz, HADOOP-6767.patch > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10981-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 09:49:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 160 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 09:49:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 09:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 87521 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 09:49:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87363 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 09:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87354 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 09:49:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:49:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:49:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o989nZKX017633 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:49:35 GMT Message-ID: <3097321.39411286531375112.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 05:49:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Volodymyr Orlov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin In-Reply-To: <3999817.74761274049343093.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Volodymyr Orlov updated HADOOP-6767: ------------------------------------ Release Note: Batch scripts for running Hadoop on windows, scripts for setting Hadoop as windows service using Apache Commons Daemon, and fixes in build (was: Patch uses JNA (https://jna.dev.java.net/) to perform operations such as getting folder size, getting disk space statistics, getting current user, current user groups, setting and getting FS permissions, setting and getting file or folder owner and group. Patch has been tested on Windows XP, Windows 2008, Windows 7. Later on I will add to the issue link to the description of how to set up Hadoop cluster on Windows without Cygwin) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) please see README.txt file in the archive I've attached to the issue > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz, HADOOP-6767.patch > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10982-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 18:30:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71521 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 18:30:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 18:30:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 67006 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 18:30:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66946 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 18:30:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66938 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 18:30:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:30:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:30:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o98IUXfn025428 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:30:33 GMT Message-ID: <24940573.44861286562633053.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:30:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files In-Reply-To: <17443930.539541286234913119.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919344#action_12919344 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6988: ---------------------------------------- Thanks for the thoughtful comments, Devaraj. As I said earlier, this is really only for convenience, as it's entirely possible to stuff multiple delegation token objects into a single credentials object, which is then serialized to a file. I considered creating a tool which would be capable of merging multiple delegation token files into one, but this seemed like a cleaner solution. Rather than having every script/job/program that wants to pass multiple independently-fetched delegation token files first invoke some command to merge them, just specify them all via the method that already exists. The problem with specifying mapreduce.job.hdfs-servers for my particular use-case is that delegation tokens can't be fetched if the application which is submitting the job is only authenticated via a delegation token in the first place. That said, I see this issue as being largely orthogonal from the core question of whether or not it is reasonable to want to specify multiple delegation token files via the system that already exists. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10983-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 08 19:23:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86264 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 19:23:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 19:23:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19176 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 19:23:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19099 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 19:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19091 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 19:23:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:23:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:23:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o98JNVNb026080 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:23:32 GMT Message-ID: <29489262.45181286565811914.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:23:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I re-ran test-patch, which was clean. I've committed this. Resolving as fixed. > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch, HADOOP-6987-2.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10985-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 10 21:55:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40141 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Oct 2010 21:55:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 1036 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 991 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 945 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ALtX5q013125 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:33 GMT Message-ID: <31036773.68371286747733904.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:55:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6944: --------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.3) 0.21.1 > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.1 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10984-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 10 21:55:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40139 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Oct 2010 21:55:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 928 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 390 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 374 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2010 21:55:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ALtVBs013104 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:55:32 GMT Message-ID: <32071085.68301286747731773.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:55:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-6944. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 Release Note: I have just committed this to 0.21 and trunk. Thanks Vinay. Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.1 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10986-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 05:02:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43207 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 05:02:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 05:02:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 95491 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 05:02:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95335 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 05:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95326 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 05:02:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:02:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:02:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9B51sVR022802 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:01:54 GMT Message-ID: <33550283.70791286773314034.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:01:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6472) add tokenCache option to GenericOptionsParser for passing file with secret keys to a map reduce job In-Reply-To: <1407870644.1262042429493.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6472: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Nobody closed this when it was committed. > add tokenCache option to GenericOptionsParser for passing file with secret keys to a map reduce job > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6472 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6472 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6472-1.patch, HADOOP-6472-2.patch, HADOOP-6472.patch > > > for MAPRED-1338 - we need an option to pass a file with secreteKeys (tokens) to a mapreduce Job. > Name of the file is set into the config and will be picked up by JobSubmiter. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10987-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 18:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92967 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 95451 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:31:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95069 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95060 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 18:31:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:31:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:31:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BIVWZg005278 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:31:32 GMT Message-ID: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:31:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6996 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: io Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.22.0 CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. This is required by HDFS-1435, where 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10988-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 18:35:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94262 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 655 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 622 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 614 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:35:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:35:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BIZY5X005371 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:35:35 GMT Message-ID: <25894800.81141286822134744.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:35:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6996: ---------------------------------- Attachment: getCodecByClassName.patch This patch 1. adds a classname to codec map to the CodecFactory; 2. adds a new method getCodecByClassName that returns a codec object given a codec class name; 3. Adds a unit test to test this new method. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10989-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 18:43:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96399 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11111 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10998 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10990 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:43:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BIhWq7005481 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:43:33 GMT Message-ID: <22169371.81271286822612441.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:43:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6996: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10990-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 20:15:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25411 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 13298 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 20:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13249 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 20:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13241 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 20:15:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:15:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:15:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BKFXv6006956 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:15:33 GMT Message-ID: <6021015.82591286828133483.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12919970#action_12919970 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6996: --------------------------------------- Ran ant patch and test on my dev machine: [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to i [exec] nclude 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. [exec] BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 8 minutes 8 seconds For -1 on java doc, all 6 javadoc warnings seem not related to my patch. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10991-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 11 21:39:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66998 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 23967 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23944 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23936 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:39:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:39:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9BLdYm3008248 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:39:34 GMT Message-ID: <3422965.83821286833174224.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:39:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6996: ---------------------------------- Attachment: getCodecByClassName1.patch This patch additionally adds a default constructor to CompressionCodecFactory. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch, getCodecByClassName1.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10992-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 04:30:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19747 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 04:30:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 04:30:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 63019 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 04:30:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62766 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 04:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62751 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 04:29:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:29:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:29:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9C4TYxg014705 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 04:29:36 GMT Message-ID: <29443531.89531286857774868.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:29:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Greg Roelofs (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6997) 'hadoop' script should set LANG or LC_COLLATE explicitly for classpath order MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 'hadoop' script should set LANG or LC_COLLATE explicitly for classpath order ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6997 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: scripts Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2, 0.22.0 Reporter: Greg Roelofs The 'hadoop' script builds the classpath in pieces, including the following bit for the bulk of it: {noformat} # add libs to CLASSPATH for f in $HADOOP_HOME/lib/*.jar; do CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:$f; done {noformat} The ordering of "*.jar", i.e., the collation order, depends on either LANG or LC_COLLATE on Linux systems. In the absence of either one, the script will default to whatever the user's environment specifies; for Red Hat, the default is "en_US", which is a case-insensitive (and punctuation-insensitive?) ordering. If LANG is set to "C" instead, the ordering changes to the ASCII/UTF-8 byte ordering. The key issue here is that $HADOOP_HOME/lib contains both upper- and lowercase jar names (e.g., "SimonTool.jar" and "commons-logging-1.1.1.jar", to pick a completely random pair), which will have an inverted order depending on which setting is used. 'hadoop' should explicitly set LANG and/or LC_COLLATE to whatever setting it's implicitly assuming. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10993-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 05:14:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30577 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 05:14:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 05:14:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 84890 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 05:14:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84859 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 05:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84850 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 05:14:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:14:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9C5EVm7015501 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:14:33 GMT Message-ID: <26842967.90301286860471693.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:14:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920096#action_12920096 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6996: ------------------------------------------ Code looks good. One minor comment: {code} public CompressionCodec getCodecByClassName(String classname) { if (codecsByClassName == null) { return null; } return codecsByClassName.get(classname); } {code} do we really need to check for codecsByClassName == null? I see that it always initialized in the constructor. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch, getCodecByClassName1.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10994-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 12:19:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21183 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 12:19:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 12:19:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 89044 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:19:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87897 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:18:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87872 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 12:18:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:18:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:18:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CCIWYT021548 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:18:33 GMT Message-ID: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:18:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alex Baranau (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add alternative search-provider to site --------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6998 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: Alex Baranau Priority: Minor Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in HDFS sources, MLs, wiki, etc. This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10995-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 12:20:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22714 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 12:20:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 12:20:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 93819 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:20:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93731 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93719 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 12:20:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:20:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:20:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CCKWiM021584 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:20:33 GMT Message-ID: <25031022.93991286886032949.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:20:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alex Baranau (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Baranau updated HADOOP-6998: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in HDFS sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10996-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 12:25:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30571 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 12:24:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 12:24:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 445 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:24:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 369 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 361 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 12:24:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:24:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:24:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CCOWWr021624 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:24:33 GMT Message-ID: <17351953.94011286886272896.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:24:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alex Baranau (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Baranau updated HADOOP-6998: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6998-common.patch HADOOP-6998.patch Patches applicable to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/site/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/site/ > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6998-common.patch, HADOOP-6998.patch > > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in HDFS sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10997-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 12:28:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34918 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 12:28:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 12:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 7161 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6813 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 12:28:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6804 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 12:28:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:28:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:28:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CCSYko021674 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:28:35 GMT Message-ID: <10148533.94051286886514830.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:28:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alex Baranau (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Baranau updated HADOOP-6998: --------------------------------- Description: Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in sources, MLs, wiki, etc. This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. was: Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in HDFS sources, MLs, wiki, etc. This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6998-common.patch, HADOOP-6998.patch > > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10998-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 16:49:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30988 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 16:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 27641 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27584 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27575 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CGnX4O026001 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:33 GMT Message-ID: <4191358.98271286902173375.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:49:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920254#action_12920254 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6996: --------------------------------------- You are right. But before I add the default class constructor, there was a possibility that codecClassName is null. Now I realize that adding the default constructor is an incompatible change. Let me revert this change by deleting the 2nd patch: getCodecByClassName1.patch. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10999-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 16:49:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31123 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28049 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27975 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27967 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CGnY2k026017 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:49:34 GMT Message-ID: <1518379.98321286902174467.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:49:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6996: ---------------------------------- Attachment: (was: getCodecByClassName1.patch) > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11000-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 17:53:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80022 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 49426 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49391 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49383 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:53:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CHraF9027244 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:53:36 GMT Message-ID: <2198347.99931286906016556.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:53:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Krishna Ramachandran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6999) security implementation for new FileSystem (FileContext) API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 security implementation for new FileSystem (FileContext) API ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6999 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6999 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Krishna Ramachandran New file system API (HADOOP 4952) should implement security features currently provided by FileSystem APIs This is a critical requirement for MapReduce components to migrate and use new APIs for internal filesystem operations (MAPREDUCE 2020) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11003-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 22:39:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86362 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29210 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29181 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29173 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CMcYSZ002685 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:35 GMT Message-ID: <25878961.105831286923114967.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6991-2.patch Forgot test case. > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11001-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 22:39:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86264 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 28751 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28689 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28675 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CMcW2i002657 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:33 GMT Message-ID: <27332509.105741286923112973.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6991-2.patch Updated Chris' patch with the test case moved from MapRed and turning on overwrite. > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11002-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 22:39:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86275 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 28773 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28701 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28690 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CMcXfB002666 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:38:33 GMT Message-ID: <5994033.105771286923113516.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:38:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Attachment: (was: h-6991-2.patch) > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11004-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 12 23:32:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40782 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 6514 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6471 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6463 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:32:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9CNWYDS003376 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:32:34 GMT Message-ID: <18207176.106251286926354632.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:32:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6818) Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider In-Reply-To: <17262845.29701276200793990.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6818: -------------------------------- Attachment: 6818-trunk-1.patch Addresses the comments from Todd. > Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6818 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6818-trunk-1.patch, 6818-trunk.patch, hadoop-6818-1.patch, hadoop-6818-2.patch, JNIGroupMapping.patch > > > The default implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider does a fork of a unix command to get the groups of a user. Since the group resolution happens in the servers, this might be costly. This jira aims at providing a JNI-based implementation for GroupMappingServiceProvider. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11005-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 00:24:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78544 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 68196 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68170 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68162 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:24:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:24:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9D0OXjs004064 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:24:33 GMT Message-ID: <16879323.106841286929473131.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:24:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Krishna Ramachandran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7000) Options.createOpts should provide API to set Progressable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Options.createOpts should provide API to set Progressable --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7000 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Krishna Ramachandran Hadoop common FileContext APIs provide means to create OutPutStream with write-progress reporting using CreateOpts. In existing Options.CreateOpts.Progess the constructor (with Progressable as argument) is protected. A method to obtain a Progress instance is missing. Attaching a preliminary suggested fix -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11006-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 00:26:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78798 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 69043 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69018 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69010 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:26:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:26:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9D0QXN1004095 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:26:33 GMT Message-ID: <8368005.106871286929593264.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:26:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Krishna Ramachandran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7000) Options.createOpts should provide API to set Progressable In-Reply-To: <16879323.106841286929473131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krishna Ramachandran updated HADOOP-7000: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7000.patch simple suggested fix > Options.createOpts should provide API to set Progressable > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7000 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Krishna Ramachandran > Attachments: HADOOP-7000.patch > > > Hadoop common FileContext APIs provide means to create OutPutStream with write-progress reporting using CreateOpts. > In existing Options.CreateOpts.Progess the constructor (with Progressable as argument) is protected. A method to obtain a Progress instance is missing. > Attaching a preliminary suggested fix -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11007-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 00:30:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83589 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 72704 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72673 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72647 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:30:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:30:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9D0UXGk004137 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:30:33 GMT Message-ID: <13215799.106891286929833272.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:30:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Krishna Ramachandran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7000) Options.createOpts should provide API to access Progress In-Reply-To: <16879323.106841286929473131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krishna Ramachandran updated HADOOP-7000: ----------------------------------------- Summary: Options.createOpts should provide API to access Progress (was: Options.createOpts should provide API to set Progressable) > Options.createOpts should provide API to access Progress > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7000 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Krishna Ramachandran > Attachments: HADOOP-7000.patch > > > Hadoop common FileContext APIs provide means to create OutPutStream with write-progress reporting using CreateOpts. > In existing Options.CreateOpts.Progess the constructor (with Progressable as argument) is protected. A method to obtain a Progress instance is missing. > Attaching a preliminary suggested fix -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11008-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 13:43:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50009 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 13:43:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 13:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 69748 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 13:43:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68032 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 13:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67883 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 13:42:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:42:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:42:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9DDgZpD015310 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:42:35 GMT Message-ID: <30314810.113111286977355852.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:42:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920546#action_12920546 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on HADOOP-6998: ------------------------------------------ For what it's worth, the following issues for the same functionality on other sub-projects have been committed so far: PIG-1661 HBASE-2886 HDFS-1367. > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6998-common.patch, HADOOP-6998.patch > > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11009-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 16:01:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8716 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 16:01:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 16:01:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 33779 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 16:01:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33751 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 16:01:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33737 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 16:01:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:01:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:01:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9DG0dgh017883 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:00:39 GMT Message-ID: <33236541.115761286985639492.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:00:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920625#action_12920625 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6998: -------------------------------------- Unless there are objections, I'll commit this in the next few days. > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6998-common.patch, HADOOP-6998.patch > > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11010-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 20:19:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33509 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 20:19:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 20:19:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 38284 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 20:19:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38224 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 20:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38216 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 20:19:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:19:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:19:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9DKJXFv023569 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:19:33 GMT Message-ID: <33337630.131381287001173475.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:19:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Krishna Ramachandran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7000) Options.createOpts should provide API to access Progress In-Reply-To: <16879323.106841286929473131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Krishna Ramachandran updated HADOOP-7000: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7000-1.patch Updated test to include Progress > Options.createOpts should provide API to access Progress > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7000 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7000 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Krishna Ramachandran > Attachments: HADOOP-7000-1.patch, HADOOP-7000.patch > > > Hadoop common FileContext APIs provide means to create OutPutStream with write-progress reporting using CreateOpts. > In existing Options.CreateOpts.Progess the constructor (with Progressable as argument) is protected. A method to obtain a Progress instance is missing. > Attaching a preliminary suggested fix -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11011-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 13 23:16:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25476 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 23:16:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 79779 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79754 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79745 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:16:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:16:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9DNGYfn026318 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:16:34 GMT Message-ID: <7600255.133881287011794656.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:16:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Erik Steffl (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6818) Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider In-Reply-To: <17262845.29701276200793990.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920802#action_12920802 ] Erik Steffl commented on HADOOP-6818: ------------------------------------- 6818-trunk-1.patch review, nothing major, just few details to consider. - line length over 80 chars, mismatched intendation in few cases (e.g. JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.java line: "be loaded");) etc., not sure how much we care about detials like that - TestJNIGroupsMapping.java - test compares groups returned by ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping and JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping, first it compares group lists for size then it looks up whether all groups returned by ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping are also in JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping. This comparison would fail for lists like (a, a, b) and (a, b, c). It's very unlikely that ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping would list the same group twice but it's fairly cheap to do exact comparison (i.e. sort the lists and compare the items one by one) - JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.java getGroups: is it not possible to return empty array from getGroupForUser and get rid of if (groups != null && groups.length != 0) and the rest of the function? - configure: what's the point of (unset CDPATH)? As far as I can tell it creates a subshell in which it unsets CDPATH which has no effect in current shell. I see the result is used to determine whether unset CDPATH is executed but why? Given that it's not clear maybe a comment would help. (or is this file generated?) - JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.c: it looks like code would be a bit simpler of cleanup label did CHECK_ERROR and code that jumps to cleanup just set the error. If cuser is NULL it could also jump to cleanup. That way there would be only ene exit point of the function, one place responsible for resource cleanup etc. - getGroup.c: functions in this file do lot of pointer manipulation, it seems they would also benefit from same techinzue used in JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping.c, i.e. initialize all pointers to NULL, in case of error jump to cleanup label that cleans everything up. Would free maintainer from thinking about whether pwbuf or group (or both or neither) should be freed or not etc. - getGroup.c getGroupIDList: in case of error ngroup is not reset to zero, shouldn't matter but would be more consistent (i.e. ngroups should always be same as number of groups in groups) > Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6818 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6818-trunk-1.patch, 6818-trunk.patch, hadoop-6818-1.patch, hadoop-6818-2.patch, JNIGroupMapping.patch > > > The default implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider does a fork of a unix command to get the groups of a user. Since the group resolution happens in the servers, this might be costly. This jira aims at providing a JNI-based implementation for GroupMappingServiceProvider. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11012-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 15:48:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39434 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 15:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 15:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 58049 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 15:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58024 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 15:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58016 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 15:48:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:48:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:48:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EFmXZw010753 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:48:33 GMT Message-ID: <29441159.143271287071313827.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:48:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6992) Update website for recent subproject departures In-Reply-To: <26161850.16451286406151616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting resolved HADOOP-6992. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Hive has now moved its website, so I have now committed this. > Update website for recent subproject departures > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6992 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6992 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6992.patch, hadoop-tlp.pdf > > > A number of subprojects have left Hadoop yet the website's not been fully updated to reflect that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11013-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 18:39:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90333 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 18:39:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 18:39:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 73551 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 18:39:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73504 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 18:39:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73496 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 18:39:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:39:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:38:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EIcakp014007 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:38:36 GMT Message-ID: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:38:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7001 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Patrick Kling Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; } The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11014-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 19:19:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14693 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 83020 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82972 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82964 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:19:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:19:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EJJYrK014784 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:19:34 GMT Message-ID: <22328346.147801287083974191.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:19:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921086#action_12921086 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------------- +1 - this would be extremely useful. May I suggest, though, that we change the name of the interface to "Reconfigurable" ? > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11015-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 19:35:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24171 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 19:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 19:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 23509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23468 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23458 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 19:35:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:35:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:35:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EJZYIh015072 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:35:34 GMT Message-ID: <16986.148121287084934041.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:35:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921093#action_12921093 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6996: ------------------------------------------ +1 looks good to me. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11016-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 19:49:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32464 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 58968 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58811 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58803 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:49:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EJnYsf015314 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:49:35 GMT Message-ID: <9748207.148421287085774917.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:49:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6628) Make Cloudera commit logs and Yahoo! change logs into web-readable formats In-Reply-To: <1089769602.209181268333067243.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer resolved HADOOP-6628. -------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed > Make Cloudera commit logs and Yahoo! change logs into web-readable formats > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6628 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: mk-cdh-readable.pl, mk-y-readable.pl > > > Here are some quick hacks to help people read the various "release notes" from the various distributions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11017-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 20:03:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38112 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 77467 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77433 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77425 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:03:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:03:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EK3YZK015586 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:03:34 GMT Message-ID: <13916308.148561287086614426.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:03:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921102#action_12921102 ] Patrick Kling commented on HADOOP-7001: --------------------------------------- I agree, Reconfigurable sounds better. Also, we would be extending the interface Configurable (not the class Configured, I got confused there). I also wanted to point out that Reconfigurable would introduce the new method changeConf in addition to the method setConf from Configurable because there is a difference in semantics: changeConf would make sure that all changes immediately affect the behaviour of the node (or failing that an exception would be thrown), whereas setConf as it is used now does not give any such guarantee (since some configuration values might be cached in other variables and some behaviour might not be changeable without a restart). > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11018-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 20:28:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50041 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30904 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30866 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30858 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:28:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:28:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EKSY23015921 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:28:35 GMT Message-ID: <29000552.148771287088114891.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:28:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921106#action_12921106 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7001: -------------------------------------------- Also, this Herriot system testing framework will be highly benefited from such a change. +1 on the idea. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11019-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 20:40:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55001 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 58431 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58399 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58391 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:40:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EKeZGA016141 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:40:35 GMT Message-ID: <32046555.149121287088835285.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:40:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6628) Make Cloudera commit logs and Yahoo! change logs into web-readable formats In-Reply-To: <1089769602.209181268333067243.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921113#action_12921113 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6628: ------------------------------------- Hey Allen, There's a jira now for any issues not covered on issues.apache.org: https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/DISTRO Thanks, Eli > Make Cloudera commit logs and Yahoo! change logs into web-readable formats > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6628 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6628 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: mk-cdh-readable.pl, mk-y-readable.pl > > > Here are some quick hacks to help people read the various "release notes" from the various distributions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11020-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 21:09:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66552 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 14783 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14755 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14747 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:09:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:09:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9EL8dEH016731 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:08:39 GMT Message-ID: <16365865.149821287090519117.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:08:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921128#action_12921128 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-7001: ------------------------------------------ It would be nice if you can paste the javadocs for this new interface and the method(s) in it. This will help understand the new API. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11021-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 21:19:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70484 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 30632 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30604 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30596 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:19:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:18:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ELIaZ0016906 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:18:36 GMT Message-ID: <22075339.150041287091115980.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:18:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921133#action_12921133 ] Patrick Kling commented on HADOOP-7001: --------------------------------------- org.apache.hadoop.conf Interface Reconfigurable All Superinterfaces: Configurable ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ public interface Reconfigurable extends Configurable Something whose Configuration can be changed at run time. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Method Summary void changeConf(Configuration conf) changes the configuration to the configuration passed if it is not possible to change a configuration option a ConfigurationException is thrown and no changes are made to the current configuration Methods inherited from interface org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configurable getConf, setConf Method Detail changeConf void changeConf(Configuration conf) throws ConfigurationChangeException changes the configuration to the configuration passed if it is not possible to change a configuration option a ConfigurationException is thrown and no changes are made to the current configuration Throws: ConfigurationChangeException Class ConfigurationChangeException java.lang.Object extended by java.lang.Throwable extended by java.lang.Exception extended by org.apache.hadoop.conf.ConfigurationChangeException All Implemented Interfaces: Serializable ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ public class ConfigurationChangeException extends Exception exception indicating that configuration property cannot be changed at run time See Also: Serialized Form ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Constructor Summary ConfigurationChangeException(String property) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal, String oldVal) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException Method Summary String getMessage() gets message describing exception String getNewValue() gets value to which property was supposed to be changed String getOldValue() gets old value of property that cannot be changed String getProperty() gets property that cannot be changed Methods inherited from class java.lang.Throwable fillInStackTrace, getCause, getLocalizedMessage, getStackTrace, initCause, printStackTrace, printStackTrace, printStackTrace, setStackTrace, toString Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object clone, equals, finalize, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, wait, wait, wait Constructor Detail ConfigurationChangeException public ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal, String oldVal) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ConfigurationChangeException public ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ConfigurationChangeException public ConfigurationChangeException(String property) Creates a new instance of ConfigurationChangeException getProperty public String getProperty() gets property that cannot be changed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ getNewValue public String getNewValue() gets value to which property was supposed to be changed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ getOldValue public String getOldValue() gets old value of property that cannot be changed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ getMessage public String getMessage() gets message describing exception Overrides: getMessage in class Throwable > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11022-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 14 21:34:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75676 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2010 21:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Oct 2010 21:34:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 60372 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:34:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60336 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2010 21:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60328 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2010 21:34:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:34:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ELYYlH017184 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:34:34 GMT Message-ID: <22619162.150491287092074006.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:34:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6998) Add alternative search-provider to site In-Reply-To: <3791054.93961286885912898.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6998: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: site Assignee: Alex Baranau Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Alex. > Add alternative search-provider to site > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6998 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Alex Baranau > Assignee: Alex Baranau > Priority: Minor > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-6998-common.patch, HADOOP-6998.patch > > > Use search-hadoop.com service to make available search in sources, MLs, wiki, etc. > This was initially proposed on user mailing list. The search service was already added in site's skin (common for all Hadoop related projects) before so this issue is about enabling it for Common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11023-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 04:40:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52262 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 04:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 04:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 73974 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 04:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73943 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 04:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73935 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 04:39:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:39:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:39:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9F4dXgm023329 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:39:33 GMT Message-ID: <16645437.154731287117573453.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:39:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6977: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6977.patch Making some changes to allow for daemon specific lookups into process environment. Specific implementations will be posted as hdfs/mr patches. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11024-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 18:40:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25292 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 18:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 18:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 50354 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 18:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50302 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 18:39:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50291 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 18:39:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:39:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:39:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FIdc8p006972 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:39:38 GMT Message-ID: <775609.166691287167978285.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:39:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D129= 21487#action_12921487 ]=20 Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------- In the newer patch, "HADOOP_OPTS" is passed in as parameter to check isJmxE= nabled and getJmxPort. I assume if user uses specific options for each dem= on, for example enabling JMX for name node daemon by passing in HADOOP_NAME= NODE_OPTS,=20 export HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS=3D"-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP_NAM= ENODE_OPTS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3D8004=E2=80=B3 then the parameter to be searched will be changed from "HADOOP_OPTS" to "HA= DOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS". If my understanding is corret, I think the patch is g= ood. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patc= h, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-697= 7.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.j= sp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the ad= dition of some way to channel metics information. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11025-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 18:48:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28060 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 74446 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74408 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74400 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:47:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:47:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FIlZmB007216 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <8685742.167171287168455560.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:47:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921493#action_12921493 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-7001: ----------------------------------------- I might be grumpy, but I think the right way to deal with configuration changes in a distributed, fault-tolerant system is to just restart the daemon entirely. We already have to deal with the daemon suddenly crashing and that not affecting the system too much, so I'm wary of extra complexity of yet another process. In practice, many configuration variables are loaded at start time and then stored as statics: stuff like threadpool sizes, for example. Not to mention that Configuration objects get copied along, so it's hard to make sure that a configuration change propagates to all possible children. I'll point out that the namenode and the jobtracker's fair scheduler already have mechanisms for dynamic configuration changes. In namenode, that's -refreshNodes. In the jt, I think the fair scheduler re-reads its XML configuration file on occasion. Both of these make a lot of sense: these are specific endpoints for managing specific data, and the semantics of those changes are easy to understand. -- Philip > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11026-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 20:51:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83093 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 20:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 20:51:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 34883 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:51:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34793 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 20:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34778 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 20:51:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:51:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:51:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FKpaL2009469 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:51:36 GMT Message-ID: <16221323.169571287175896839.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:51:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921544#action_12921544 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-7001: ------------------------------------------ But a simple thing like increasing the number of handler threads in a server require the downtime of the server. If we can make the namenode implement Reconfigurable, then we will have the ability to change a few select of parameters dynamically, isn't it? > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11027-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 21:08:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92225 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 65764 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65729 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:08:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FL8bav009868 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:08:38 GMT Message-ID: <5588192.170011287176917638.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:08:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921552#action_12921552 ] Patrick Kling commented on HADOOP-7001: --------------------------------------- I absolutely agree that there will likely be many configuration options that cannot be changed at run time and implementing Reconfigurable does not require that we can make arbitrary changes. For the configuration changes that are possible at run time (such as the existing examples mentioned by Philip), it would be nice to have a consistent mechanism. The interface could also make it easier to propagate configuration changes (by calling changeConf on objects to which the current configuration was propagated). This should be a bit easier to read than the JavaDoc I posted before: {code} package org.apache.hadoop.conf; /** * Something whose {@link Configuration} can be changed at run time. */ public interface Reconfigurable extends Configurable { /** * Change the configuration of this object. * * Change the configuration of this object to the configuration * passed as conf. * If it is not possible to change a configuration option, * a {@link ConfigurationChangeException} is thrown * and no changes are made to the current configuration */ void changeConf(Configuration conf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; } {code} {code} package org.apache.hadoop.conf; /** * Exception indicating that configuration property cannot be changed * at run time. */ public class ConfigurationChangeException extends Exception { private String property; private String newVal; private String oldVal; /** * Construct the exception message. */ private static String constructMessage(String property, String newVal, String oldVal) { String message = "Could not change property " + property; if (oldVal != null) { message += " from " + oldVal; } if (newVal != null) { message += " to " + newVal; } return message; } /** * Create a new instance of {@link ConfigurationChangeException}. */ public ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal, String oldVal) { super(constructMessage(property, newVal, oldVal)); this.property = property; this.newVal = newVal; this.oldVal = oldVal; } /** * Create a new instance of {@link ConfigurationChangeException}. */ public ConfigurationChangeException(String property, String newVal, String oldVal, Throwable cause) { super(constructMessage(property, newVal, oldVal), cause); this.property = property; this.newVal = newVal; this.oldVal = oldVal; } /** * Get property that cannot be changed. */ public String getProperty() { return property; } /** * Get value to which property was supposed to be changed. */ public String getNewValue() { return newVal; } /** * Get old value of property that cannot be changed. */ public String getOldValue() { return oldVal; } {code} > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11028-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 21:09:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92321 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 66137 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66106 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66098 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:09:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:09:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FL8dVn009908 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:08:39 GMT Message-ID: <7658735.170141287176919880.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:08:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921553#action_12921553 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-7001: ----------------------------------------- I think that the number of reconfigurable parameters will be quite small, and that they will require extra code. (e.g., changing the size of a thread pool requires a line or two of code). So maybe it's just better to expose those things in some more direct way? At the very least, we should make it quite clear where it's going to be documented what things are re-configurable. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11029-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 21:17:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96868 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83493 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83456 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83448 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:17:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FLHJvF010085 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:17:20 GMT Message-ID: <15796991.170441287177439792.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:17:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur reassigned HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------------- Assignee: Patrick Kling > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11030-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 21:28:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2982 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 2773 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2749 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2741 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:28:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:28:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FLSXax010216 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:28:33 GMT Message-ID: <2967006.170541287178113545.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:28:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921561#action_12921561 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------------- Thanks for the review, Tanping. That's exactly the idea. If you take a look at the latest HDFS-1408 it implements this approach. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11031-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 22:41:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31462 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 88112 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88079 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88071 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:41:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:40:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FMeaBe011411 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:40:36 GMT Message-ID: <19978371.171881287182436037.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:40:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Kling updated HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------- Attachment: reconfigurable.patch > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11032-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 22:50:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32884 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 95615 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95594 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95586 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:50:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:50:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FMocqI011578 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:50:38 GMT Message-ID: <18525242.172141287183038547.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:50:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Kling updated HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------- Attachment: reconfigurable.patch > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11033-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 22:51:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32930 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 95804 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95773 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95765 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:51:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:50:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FMoaKk011539 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:50:36 GMT Message-ID: <24720232.172011287183036319.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:50:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Kling updated HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------- Attachment: (was: reconfigurable.patch) > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11034-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 15 22:58:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35091 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 99233 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99160 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99152 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:58:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9FMwZDp011710 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:58:35 GMT Message-ID: <15798614.172321287183515746.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:58:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921584#action_12921584 ] Patrick Kling commented on HADOOP-7001: --------------------------------------- I have uploaded a patch with the changes proposed in this JIRA. The included base class can be used to easily implement the interface by overriding the method changeProperty, which modifies a single configuration property: {code} /** * Change a property or throw an exception. * * Subclasses should overrride this. * If newVal is null, change the property to its default value. */ protected boolean changeProperty(String property, String newVal) throws ConfigurationChangeException { throw new ConfigurationChangeException(property, newVal, getConf().get(property)); } {code} This should enable us to include whatever code is necessary to make a configuration change. The overridden version of this method should also serve as a good documentation of what changes are supported by a particular class. Below is a version of the Reconfigurable interface with more detailed comments. Unfortunately, I cannot edit my previous comments, so I apologize if this is somewhat redundant: {code} package org.apache.hadoop.conf; /** * Something whose {@link Configuration} can be changed at run time. */ public interface Reconfigurable extends Configurable { /** * Change the configuration of this object. * * Change the configuration of this object to the configuration * passed as conf. * If it is not possible to change a configuration option, * a {@link ConfigurationChangeException} is thrown * and no changes are made to the current configuration. * * Detailed semantics: * * If a property is set in the current configuration and in newConf, then * the configuration must be updated to reflect the value in newConf. * * If a property is not set in the current configuration but is set in * newConf, then the configuration must be set to the value in newConf. * * If a property is set in the current configuration but is not set in * newConf, then the configuration must revert to the default value for * this property. * * If the change required by these rules is not possible, a * ConfigurationChangeException must be thrown. */ void changeConf(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; } {code} > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11035-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 13:24:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46661 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 13:24:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 13:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 42520 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:24:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42118 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42106 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 13:24:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:24:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IDOMTH005743 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:24:22 GMT Message-ID: <33487257.21331287408262876.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:24:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7002) copy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 copy ---- Key: HADOOP-7002 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7002 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Jingguo Yao -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11036-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 13:37:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51544 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 13:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 13:37:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 68732 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:37:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68563 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68555 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 13:37:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:37:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:37:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IDbNGG005946 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:37:23 GMT Message-ID: <25380438.21551287409043514.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:37:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7002) Wrong description of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal in documentation In-Reply-To: <33487257.21331287408262876.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao updated HADOOP-7002: -------------------------------- Description: The descriptions of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal are wrong. For copyFromLocal, the documentation says "Similar to put command, except that the source is restricted to a local file reference." But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyFromLocal is the sames as put. For copyToLocal, the documentation says "Similar to get command, except that the destination is restricted to a local file reference.". But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyToLocal is the same as get. And this problem exist for both English and Chinese documentation. Priority: Minor (was: Major) Remaining Estimate: 0.33h Original Estimate: 0.33h Summary: Wrong description of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal in documentation (was: copy) > Wrong description of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal in documentation > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7002 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7002 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 0.33h > Remaining Estimate: 0.33h > > The descriptions of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal are wrong. > For copyFromLocal, the documentation says "Similar to put command, except that the source is restricted to a local file reference." But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyFromLocal is the sames as put. > For copyToLocal, the documentation says "Similar to get command, except that the destination is restricted to a local file reference.". But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyToLocal is the same as get. > And this problem exist for both English and Chinese documentation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11037-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 13:47:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54028 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 13:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 13:47:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 85860 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:47:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85796 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 13:47:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85782 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 13:47:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IDlO3o006085 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:25 GMT Message-ID: <6463293.21601287409644910.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:47:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7002) Wrong description of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal in documentation In-Reply-To: <33487257.21331287408262876.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922073#action_12922073 ] Jingguo Yao commented on HADOOP-7002: ------------------------------------- If some committer think that I am right and want to fix it, I am happy to create a patch. > Wrong description of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal in documentation > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7002 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7002 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 0.33h > Remaining Estimate: 0.33h > > The descriptions of copyFromLocal and copyToLocal are wrong. > For copyFromLocal, the documentation says "Similar to put command, except that the source is restricted to a local file reference." But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyFromLocal is the sames as put. > For copyToLocal, the documentation says "Similar to get command, except that the destination is restricted to a local file reference.". But from the source code of FsShell.java, I can see that copyToLocal is the same as get. > And this problem exist for both English and Chinese documentation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11038-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 18:05:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15026 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 18:05:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 18:05:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 30667 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:05:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30580 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30572 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 18:05:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:05:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9II5Rq7010771 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:05:27 GMT Message-ID: <4493614.26461287425127395.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:05:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6818) Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider In-Reply-To: <17262845.29701276200793990.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922184#action_12922184 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6818: ------------------------------------- Took a look at the updated patch, looks good from my point of view. +1. > Provide a JNI-based implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6818 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6818 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6818-trunk-1.patch, 6818-trunk.patch, hadoop-6818-1.patch, hadoop-6818-2.patch, JNIGroupMapping.patch > > > The default implementation of GroupMappingServiceProvider does a fork of a unix command to get the groups of a user. Since the group resolution happens in the servers, this might be costly. This jira aims at providing a JNI-based implementation for GroupMappingServiceProvider. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11039-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 18:32:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31146 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 60665 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60617 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60609 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IIWPIY011243 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:25 GMT Message-ID: <18157421.27001287426745349.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:32:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6917) Remove empty FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java file In-Reply-To: <5727198.474711282328956153.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922204#action_12922204 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6917: ----------------------------------- It's not possible to produce a patch for this since the file is empty. The fix is to run {{svn rm src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ftp/FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java}} and commit. > Remove empty FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java file > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6917 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6917 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > > FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java is empty and not used so should be deleted. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11040-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 18:32:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31175 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 60832 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60795 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60787 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9IIWP5G011249 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:32:25 GMT Message-ID: <5062509.27021287426745661.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:32:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6917) Remove empty FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java file In-Reply-To: <5727198.474711282328956153.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reassigned HADOOP-6917: --------------------------------- Assignee: Tom White > Remove empty FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java file > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6917 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6917 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > > FTPFileSystemConfigKeys.java is empty and not used so should be deleted. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11041-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 18 21:34:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31357 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 40634 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40606 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40598 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:34:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:34:50 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ILYTLp014358 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:34:30 GMT Message-ID: <5367887.30271287437669145.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:34:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922279#action_12922279 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6954: -------------------------------------------- +1 patch looks good. > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11042-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 19 00:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86825 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 42454 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42399 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42391 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:10:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:10:50 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9J0ATY0017395 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:10:30 GMT Message-ID: <2815899.34171287447029909.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:10:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922375#action_12922375 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6977: -------------------------------------------- Running test-patch on my laptop. {noformat} [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {noformat} Warning seems to be coming from security related code as in last N test-patch runs. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11043-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 20 20:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64823 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2010 20:54:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Oct 2010 20:54:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 4602 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4562 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2010 20:54:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4444 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2010 20:54:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:54:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:54:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9KKsQso003309 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:54:26 GMT Message-ID: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:54:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7003 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: build Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11044-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 06:40:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47730 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 06:40:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 06:40:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 30880 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 06:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30826 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 06:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30818 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 06:40:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:40:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:40:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9L6eHna012863 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:40:17 GMT Message-ID: <20649000.2011287643217154.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:40:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Attachment: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh Attaching a replacement for nightly/hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh. This is not yet a patch file. Want to make this easier to review. The script is written for linux (tweaks are needed for MacOS) and requires xpath cmd line tool to be installed (sudo apt-get install libxml-xpath-perl). > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11045-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 06:42:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48173 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 06:42:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 06:42:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 33026 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 06:42:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32907 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 06:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32895 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 06:42:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:42:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:42:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9L6gHeZ012903 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:42:17 GMT Message-ID: <9190855.2091287643336977.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 02:42:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923345#action_12923345 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7003: ------------------------------------- The current patch testing process has a number of flaws: # reliance on email to determine when a patch is available # a job per *slave* that you want to run the testing on # because of 2, poor sharing of resources across many projects # an admin job that tracks the queue and running jobs but can get confused if jobs fail or hudson is rebooted Hudson has come a long way since I first set it up 4 years ago to run our patch testing. A recent Hudson feature allows the *same* job to be executed at the *same* time. A more established feature is the ability to pass parameters between jobs. These feature now enable a simpler architecture for patch testing. Here are the new Hudson jobs needed: *PreCommit-Admin* This job replaces the current patch testing admin job and runs every 5 to 10 minutes. It runs a new version of the hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh script (attached). The new script roughly follows these steps: # grabs the XML output of a Jira filter that contains all the issues that should be tested by the system. For instance, this filter contains all the HADOOP, HDFS, and MAPREDUCE issues that are in Patch Available state: https://issues.apache.org/jira/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-xml/12313474/SearchRequest-12313474.xml?tempMax=100 By changing the filter (eg. adding PIG and ZOOKEEPER for instance), this hudson job will run tests for those project issues as well. # processes the XML into a list of , pairs, where attachment id is the id for the newest attachment # grabs the one build artifact that this job keeps: a list of pairs: , . This file is called patch_tested.txt and contains the pairs already submitted for testing. # for each pair from the XML, see if the pair is in patch_tested.txt. If not, kick a new project build (next job below) and append the pair to the file. When kicking off the new build, pass the issue number (and optional the attachment id) to the build. The build to kick off is computed as "PreCommit--Build". This same project build can be kicked off many times by this execution of the admin job -- each instance sitting in the Hudson queue until a slave is available. # when this admin job completes, archive the latest patch_tested.txt *PreCommit--Build* A job with this name (eg PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build) must exist for each Jira project administered by PreCommit-Admin. The job must enable concurrent builds in it's configuration. This job downloads the patch, does the actual testing and puts a comment in Jira. It does not communicate back to the admin job. The job is tied to slaves that are configured with a certain label. The label is the same as the project name. *Slaves* Slaves are configured to run a certain project job (like PreCommit-HDFS-Build) by being labeled with the project (eg HDFS). This means that any properly configured slave can be easily added to the build pool and start taking on load. It also means that most slaves should be able to run most patch tests for most projects. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11046-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 08:14:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74697 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 08:14:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 08:14:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28608 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 08:14:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28470 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 08:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28462 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 08:14:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:14:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9L8EJKX014397 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:14:19 GMT Message-ID: <5419931.3001287648859175.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:14:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Henning Blohm (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7004) Problem with org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.REGISTRY MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Problem with org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.REGISTRY ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7004 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7004 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Environment: hadoop 0.20.2, hbase 0.20.6 Reporter: Henning Blohm Priority: Minor When reusing Configuration that has an added addResource(InputStream) a reload of configuration will fail as the stream has been read before. The reload gets triggered when addDefaultResource is called. That method uses the REGISTRY static WeakHashMap to reach out to all reachable Configuration instances to reset their properties. The method addDefaultResource is called by e.g. ConfigUtil in org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.util (hadoop trunk) or JobConf (hadoop 0.20.2). The problem has been observed in Hadoop 0.20.2 but the code in trunk has essentially the same structure. There are a few problems here: 1. You cannot safely use addResource(InputStream), if Configuration objects are to be re-used (you can however use addResource(URL) instead) 2. Modifying the state of Configuration instances at some later point in time as a side effect of some class initialization in some completely unrelated thread leads to unpredictable behavior (properties change under the hood) 3. Configuration instances keep context classloaders to find resources. After redeployment these may not be "valid" anymore. As long as the Configuration instance has not been collected, addDefaultResource will still invoke reloadConfiguration on them. While that is harmless today (only resetting members), this looks like a ticking time bomb. Suggestion: Define all default resources in Configuration once. Do not hold on to other configuration instances and do not modify their state as a side effect of some other activity. See also: http://osdir.com/ml/general/2010-10/msg25893.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11047-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41194 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 48134 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48089 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48081 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQIEN020982 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:18 GMT Message-ID: <3209187.13611287689178137.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6971) Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage In-Reply-To: <24019340.389891285355492616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923584#action_12923584 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6971: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6971.patch, HADOOP-6971.y20S.patch > > > Because of the way the structure of Hadoop's builds is done Clover can't properly detect test classes among the sources. As the result clover reports are incomplete and do not provide viral per-test coverage info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11048-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41276 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 48999 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48964 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48917 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQHbo020976 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:17 GMT Message-ID: <214277.13591287689177706.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923583#action_12923583 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6984: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch, 6984-3.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11049-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41316 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 49437 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49407 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49376 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQLjR021028 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:21 GMT Message-ID: <19171615.13761287689181609.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923588#action_12923588 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6993: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11050-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41338 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 49981 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49947 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49915 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQM63021043 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:22 GMT Message-ID: <17694183.13811287689182363.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6933) TestListFiles is flaky In-Reply-To: <14615079.42351282946633507.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923589#action_12923589 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6933: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > TestListFiles is flaky > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6933.txt > > > TestListFiles assumes a particular order of the files returned by the directory iterator. There's no such guarantee made by the underlying API, so the test fails on some hosts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11051-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41358 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 50341 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50308 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50272 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQJRA020995 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:19 GMT Message-ID: <24484275.13651287689179806.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923585#action_12923585 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6944: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.1 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11052-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41397 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 50968 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50936 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50908 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQK61021007 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:20 GMT Message-ID: <9677656.13691287689180598.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6879) Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests In-Reply-To: <11760779.565921279956469755.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D129= 23586#action_12923586 ]=20 Hudson commented on HADOOP-6879: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.o= rg/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) =20 > Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Iyappan Srinivasan > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6879-ydist-security-patch.txt, HADOOP-6879.patch, HA= DOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, H= ADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, = HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y2= 0.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patc= h, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch > > > http://mvnrepository.com/ > com.jcraft =C2=BB jsch=20 > 0.1.42 version needs to be included in the build. This is needed to faci= litate implementation of some system (Herriot) testcases . > Please include this in ivy. > jsch is originally located in http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11053-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41457 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 51181 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51131 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51117 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQOeW021064 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:24 GMT Message-ID: <26559547.13881287689184114.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6856) SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors In-Reply-To: <19355698.285171278691549769.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923590#action_12923590 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6856: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6856 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: h-6856.patch, h-6856.patch > > > Currently there are 2 public SequenceFile.Reader constructors, 3 public SequenceFile.Writer constructors, 9 public SequenceFile.createWriter, 2 public MapFile.Reader constructors, and 8 public MapFile.Writer constructors. All of with various historical combinations of parameters that don't cover the entire space. > All of this makes it *very* difficult to add new optional parameters to SequenceFile and MapFile. > I'd like change to the style of FileContext.create with option parameters. I'll implement one public SequenceFile.Reader constructor and one public SequenceFile.createWriter and implement all of the current variants based on those two. I'll do the same for MapFile.Reader and MapFile.Writer including passing parameters down to the underlying SequenceFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11054-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41465 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 51198 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51135 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51121 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQLtW021019 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:21 GMT Message-ID: <28778464.13731287689181186.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6969) CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. In-Reply-To: <12538682.369991285269513067.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923587#action_12923587 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6969: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6969 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: CHANGES.txt should show the release date for 0.21.0 and include section for for 0.21.1 - Unreleased. Latest changes, that did not make into 0.21.0, should be moved under 0.21.1 section. > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11055-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:26:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41686 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 51543 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51514 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51506 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQOfl021073 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:24 GMT Message-ID: <32767006.13911287689184511.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923591#action_12923591 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6996: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11056-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:27:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41915 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 52737 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52703 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52695 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:27:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQsG3021109 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:54 GMT Message-ID: <13861962.14011287689214713.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923593#action_12923593 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6989: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11057-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 19:27:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41941 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 19:27:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 52918 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52881 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52873 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:27:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:27:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LJQtou021121 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:26:55 GMT Message-ID: <25512333.14051287689215291.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:26:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923594#action_12923594 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #395 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/395/]) > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch, HADOOP-6987-2.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11058-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 21:02:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91775 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 49686 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49656 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49648 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:02:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LL2Iq4022975 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:02:18 GMT Message-ID: <33188746.16591287694938378.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:02:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Attachment: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh Here's a new version with a few tweaks after talking with Giri. I'll go ahead and commit this. Giri agreed to setup new Hudson jobs based on this. Once it's up and running, we can delete the old jobs. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11059-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:19:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48696 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 68773 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68744 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68736 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LMJJmF024353 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:19 GMT Message-ID: <29655880.18051287699559943.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:19:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI In-Reply-To: <19001973.112581277141003401.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6382.patch Here's the trivial update. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11060-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 21 22:19:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48738 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 68962 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68922 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68914 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9LMJKLA024371 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:19:20 GMT Message-ID: <16145244.18111287699560719.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:19:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI In-Reply-To: <19001973.112581277141003401.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11061-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 00:59:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15733 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9242 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9202 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9194 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:59:00 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M0wdHa026660 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:58:39 GMT Message-ID: <27712658.20141287709119551.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:58:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923722#action_12923722 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6947: ------------------------------------- Kan, mind committing this? It got +1 from you and Hudson. > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11062-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 06:20:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3416 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 06:20:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 06:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 234 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 130 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:20:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 120 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 06:20:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:20:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:20:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M6KJF9001061 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:20:19 GMT Message-ID: <22078635.22271287728419072.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:20:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923771#action_12923771 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------------------- PreCommit-Admin and the PreCommit--Build jobs are ready. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11063-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 06:53:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15297 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 06:53:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 06:53:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22046 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:53:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21857 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 06:53:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21843 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 06:53:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:53:36 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M6rGNt001473 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:53:16 GMT Message-ID: <10205943.22621287730396161.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:53:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley resolved HADOOP-7003. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: hudson Assignee: Nigel Daley I just committed this. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11064-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 07:12:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22874 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 07:12:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 07:12:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 41121 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 07:12:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41044 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 07:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41034 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 07:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:12:37 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M7CG9i001887 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:12:16 GMT Message-ID: <22110062.22991287731536485.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:12:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923786#action_12923786 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #396 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/396/]) HADOOP-7003: New script for managing queue of pre-commit patches that need testing. Contributed by nigel. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11065-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 08:12:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39535 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 08:12:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 08:12:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 81257 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 08:12:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81155 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 08:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81147 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 08:12:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:12:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:12:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9M8CICo002800 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:12:19 GMT Message-ID: <12940800.23461287735138947.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:12:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923798#action_12923798 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #413 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/413/]) HADOOP-7003: New script for managing queue of pre-commit patches that need testing. Contributed by nigel. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11066-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 10:52:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86649 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 10:52:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 10:52:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 39634 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 10:52:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39471 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 10:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39373 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 10:52:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:52:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:52:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MAqJes004941 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:52:19 GMT Message-ID: <25889744.24441287744739441.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:52:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923815#action_12923815 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #976 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/976/]) HADOOP-7003: New script for managing queue of pre-commit patches that need testing. Contributed by nigel. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11067-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47335 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 87610 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86875 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86306 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuOCt006545 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:24 GMT Message-ID: <11172354.25141287752184130.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6984) NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption In-Reply-To: <10251121.516661286092293049.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923831#action_12923831 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6984: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > NPE from SequenceFile::Writer.CompressionCodecOption > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6984 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6984-0.patch, 6984-1.patch, 6984-2.patch, 6984-3.patch > > > The deprecated HADOOP-6856 constructors can create a compressed writers with a null-wrapped {{CompressionCodecOption}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11069-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47388 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 87926 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87698 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87129 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuPgr006566 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:25 GMT Message-ID: <31328021.25201287752185546.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6944) [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. In-Reply-To: <13358164.74161283948073125.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923833#action_12923833 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6944: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > [Herriot] Implement a functionality for getting proxy users definitions like groups and hosts. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6944 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.1 > Reporter: Vinay Kumar Thota > Assignee: Vinay Kumar Thota > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch, HADOOP-6944.patch > > > Gridmix should require a proxy user's file for impersonating various jobs. So, implement couple of methods for getting the proxy users list and a proxy users file (it's a combination of proxy users and groups) based on cluster configuration. > The proxy users list should require for map reduce jobs and proxy users file should require for gridmix jobs. > The following are methods signature, > public ProxyUserDefinitions getHadoopProxyUsers() - get the list of proxy users list based on cluster configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11068-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47369 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 87736 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87495 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86312 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuOaE006551 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:24 GMT Message-ID: <22241544.25161287752184505.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6971) Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage In-Reply-To: <24019340.389891285355492616.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923832#action_12923832 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6971: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > Clover build doesn't generate per-test coverage > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6971 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6971 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6971.patch, HADOOP-6971.y20S.patch > > > Because of the way the structure of Hadoop's builds is done Clover can't properly detect test classes among the sources. As the result clover reports are incomplete and do not provide viral per-test coverage info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11072-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47470 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 88445 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88396 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88356 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuSqE006629 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:28 GMT Message-ID: <12303142.25401287752188643.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6989) TestSetFile is failing on trunk In-Reply-To: <4408858.540201286236594170.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923838#action_12923838 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6989: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > TestSetFile is failing on trunk > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6989 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6989 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6989-0.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.015 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,030 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(56)) - generating 10000 records in memory > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,249 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:generate(63)) - sorting 10000 records > 2010-10-04 16:32:01,350 INFO io.TestSetFile (TestSetFile.java:writeTest(72)) - creating with 10000 records > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testSetFile took 0.964 sec > Caused an ERROR > key class or comparator option must be set > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: key class or comparator option must be set > at org.apache.hadoop.io.MapFile$Writer.(MapFile.java:247) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.SetFile$Writer.(SetFile.java:60) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.writeTest(TestSetFile.java:73) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile.testSetFile(TestSetFile.java:45) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11070-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47438 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 88027 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87883 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87466 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuQFD006589 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:26 GMT Message-ID: <23584626.25271287752186765.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6969) CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. In-Reply-To: <12538682.369991285269513067.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923835#action_12923835 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6969: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > CHANGES.txt does not reflect the release of version 0.21.0. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6969 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6969 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: CHANGES.txt should show the release date for 0.21.0 and include section for for 0.21.1 - Unreleased. Latest changes, that did not make into 0.21.0, should be moved under 0.21.1 section. > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11071-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47458 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 88179 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87958 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87485 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuRlZ006605 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:27 GMT Message-ID: <3965433.25321287752187456.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6933) TestListFiles is flaky In-Reply-To: <14615079.42351282946633507.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923836#action_12923836 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6933: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > TestListFiles is flaky > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6933 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6933.txt > > > TestListFiles assumes a particular order of the files returned by the directory iterator. There's no such guarantee made by the underlying API, so the test fails on some hosts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11073-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47537 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 88646 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88603 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88577 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuQAj006577 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:26 GMT Message-ID: <33185788.25231287752186105.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6993) Broken link on cluster setup page of docs In-Reply-To: <22210278.19631286425112055.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923834#action_12923834 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6993: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > Broken link on cluster setup page of docs > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6993 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6993 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6993-21-1.patch, hadoop-6993-22-1.patch > > > The link on http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuring+the+Hadoop+Daemons to core-default.xml is presently: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/common-default.html > {quote} > but it should be: > {quote} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/core-default.html > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11074-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47553 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 88808 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88617 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88608 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuTlZ006641 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:29 GMT Message-ID: <18475000.25441287752189254.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6987) Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds In-Reply-To: <26687627.538921286230953013.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923839#action_12923839 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6987: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > Use JUnit Rule to optionally fail test cases that run more than 10 seconds > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6987 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6987 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6897.patch, HADOOP-6987-2.patch > > > Using JUnit Rules annotations we can fail tests cases that take longer than 10 seconds (for instance) to run. This provides a regression check against test cases taking longer than they had previously due to unintended code changes, as well as provides a membership criteria for unit tests versus integration tests in HDFS and MR. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11075-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47732 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 89025 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88983 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88961 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:50 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuUIg006663 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:30 GMT Message-ID: <2616826.25511287752190265.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6951) Distinct minicluster services (e.g. NN and JT) overwrite each other's service policies In-Reply-To: <3990308.158511284404253537.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923840#action_12923840 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6951: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > Distinct minicluster services (e.g. NN and JT) overwrite each other's service policies > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6951 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6951 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6951.1.txt, hadoop-6951.2.txt, hadoop-6951.txt.0 > > > Because the protocol -> ACL mapping in ServiceAuthorizationManager is static, services which are run in the same JVM have the potential to clobber the other's service authorization ACLs whenever ServiceAuthorizationManager.refresh() is called. This causes authorization failures if one tries to launch a 2NN connected to a minicluster with hadoop.security.authorization enabled. Seems like each service should have its own instance of a ServiceAuthorizationManager, instead of using static methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11076-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47753 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 89201 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89065 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88969 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuRIW006614 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:27 GMT Message-ID: <30095452.25351287752187851.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923837#action_12923837 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6996: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11077-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47786 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 89375 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89326 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89199 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuU13006675 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:30 GMT Message-ID: <23038314.25551287752190875.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6879) Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests In-Reply-To: <11760779.565921279956469755.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D129= 23841#action_12923841 ]=20 Hudson commented on HADOOP-6879: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/huds= on/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) =20 > Provide SSH based (Jsch) remote execution API for system tests > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Iyappan Srinivasan > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6879-ydist-security-patch.txt, HADOOP-6879.patch, HA= DOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, H= ADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, = HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y2= 0.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch, HADOOP-6879.y20.patc= h, HADOOP-6879.y20.patch > > > http://mvnrepository.com/ > com.jcraft =C2=BB jsch=20 > 0.1.42 version needs to be included in the build. This is needed to faci= litate implementation of some system (Herriot) testcases . > Please include this in ivy. > jsch is originally located in http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11078-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47899 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 89561 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89525 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89516 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuXxU006702 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:33 GMT Message-ID: <11116455.25641287752193419.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923842#action_12923842 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) HADOOP-7003: New script for managing queue of pre-commit patches that need testing. Contributed by nigel. > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11079-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 12:56:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47974 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 12:56:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 89754 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89726 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89718 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 12:56:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MCuZGU006723 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:56:35 GMT Message-ID: <25306448.25711287752195070.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:56:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6856) SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors In-Reply-To: <19355698.285171278691549769.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923843#action_12923843 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6856: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #489 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/489/]) > SequenceFile and MapFile need cleanup to remove redundant constructors > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6856 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6856 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: h-6856.patch, h-6856.patch > > > Currently there are 2 public SequenceFile.Reader constructors, 3 public SequenceFile.Writer constructors, 9 public SequenceFile.createWriter, 2 public MapFile.Reader constructors, and 8 public MapFile.Writer constructors. All of with various historical combinations of parameters that don't cover the entire space. > All of this makes it *very* difficult to add new optional parameters to SequenceFile and MapFile. > I'd like change to the style of FileContext.create with option parameters. I'll implement one public SequenceFile.Reader constructor and one public SequenceFile.createWriter and implement all of the current variants based on those two. I'll do the same for MapFile.Reader and MapFile.Writer including passing parameters down to the underlying SequenceFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11080-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 18:34:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85620 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 18:34:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 18:34:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 95903 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 18:34:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95867 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 18:34:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95859 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 18:34:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:34:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:34:30 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MIY8P8014247 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:34:08 GMT Message-ID: <17316828.31121287772448177.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:34:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6317: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Found this in the patch queue. The patch no longer applies cleanly. I'll try to repair it. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11081-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 18:42:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87730 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6673 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6635 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6627 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:42:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:42:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MIg7jP014402 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:42:07 GMT Message-ID: <28550512.31341287772927514.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:42:07 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6317: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6317.patch Fixed patch to apply to current trunk. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11082-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 19:12:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98180 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 39223 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39184 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39176 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:37 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MJCGq4014920 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:12:17 GMT Message-ID: <424787.31921287774736794.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:12:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923979#action_12923979 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6996: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12456881/getCodecByClassName.patch against trunk revision 1022697. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2/console This message is automatically generated. > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11083-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 19:20:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99859 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 48667 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48623 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48615 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:20:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:20:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MJKISe015065 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:20:18 GMT Message-ID: <28225139.32151287775218036.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:20:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6317: --------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) {code} -1 overall. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {code} I don't get the javadoc failure, since there are the same 6 javadoc warnings with or without this patch. Arun, do you have concerns with this patch? If not, I'll commit it. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11084-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 22 20:42:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26317 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 50560 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50537 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50529 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:42:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:42:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MKgMZM016299 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:42:22 GMT Message-ID: <2462530.33481287780142022.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:42:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924014#action_12924014 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6317: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12457858/HADOOP-6317.patch against trunk revision 1022697. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/4/console This message is automatically generated. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11085-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:33:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93402 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 91579 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90585 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90558 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:33:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:33:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:33:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6XJrd009945 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:33:20 GMT Message-ID: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:33:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7005 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Reporter: Nigel Daley Fix For: hudson -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11086-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:41:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94848 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 97537 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96723 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96715 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6fMK2010086 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:22 GMT Message-ID: <3335187.54381287988882433.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:41:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7005.patch This removes the callback and uses Hudson's BUILD_URL env variable instead of hardcoded url. Once we get this right, it will need to be copied to MR and HDFS too or we need to go back to using svn externals to pulls this script in from nightly/test-patch dir. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11087-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:41:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94864 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:41:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 97689 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97476 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97388 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6fL0r010077 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:41:21 GMT Message-ID: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:41:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Nauroth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Chris Nauroth Fix For: 0.22.0 Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11088-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:49:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96776 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:49:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:49:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10220 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:49:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10099 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10090 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:49:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:49:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:49:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6nJb3010205 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:49:20 GMT Message-ID: <27689874.54541287989359909.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:49:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Nauroth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924465#action_12924465 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-7006: --------------------------------------- It appears that this was introduced with changeset 949658. Here is a partial diff of org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil: {noformat} @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ Configuration conf, String addString) throws IOException { dstFile = checkDest(srcDir.getName(), dstFS, dstFile, false); - if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDir()) + if (srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) return false; {noformat} Notice that in addition to switching from isDir() to isDirectory(), this change also dropped the negation on the front of the condition. I'll attach a simple one-line patch to restore functionality. I've also added a unit test to cover the FileUtil.copyMerge API. I'd like to volunteer for HADOOP-6387 next, and I want this unit test in place as a regression test while I work on that. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11089-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:53:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97434 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:53:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 12974 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12810 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:53:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12802 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:53:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:53:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:53:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6rK5q010277 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:53:20 GMT Message-ID: <19342497.54561287989600153.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:53:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Nauroth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Nauroth updated HADOOP-7006: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7006.patch I've attached the patch. Could I please have a code review? Thank you. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11090-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 06:55:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98982 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 06:55:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 06:55:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18841 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:55:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18730 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 06:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18721 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 06:55:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:55:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:55:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P6tOG0010340 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:55:24 GMT Message-ID: <26168514.54681287989724056.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 02:55:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Nauroth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6387) FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken In-Reply-To: <299744839.1259028040128.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924468#action_12924468 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-6387: --------------------------------------- I'd like to volunteer for this issue, after my patch for HADOOP-7006, which involves the same part of the codebase. > FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell -getmerge command doesn't work if the "source file pattern" matches files. See below. If the current behavior is intended then we should update the help documentation and java docs to match, but it would be nice if the user could specify a set of files in a directory rather than just directories. > {code} > $ hadoop fs -help getmerge > -getmerge : Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > $ hadoop fs -ls > Found 3 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/2.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/3.txt > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/*.txt sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > 1 > 2 > 3 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11091-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 07:11:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7878 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 34687 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34644 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34624 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P7BLOT010745 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:21 GMT Message-ID: <1120688.55141287990681767.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:11:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6985.patch > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11092-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 07:11:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7896 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 34845 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34698 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34621 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 07:11:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P7BMeL010760 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:11:22 GMT Message-ID: <28681621.55191287990682309.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:11:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11093-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 16:33:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7602 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 16:33:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 16:33:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 18117 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 16:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18070 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 16:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18062 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 16:33:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:33:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PGXPTI019717 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:33:25 GMT Message-ID: <26555000.61321288024405671.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:33:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924621#action_12924621 ] Kan Zhang commented on HADOOP-6947: ----------------------------------- Todd, sorry for late reply. I just got back after a long leave. And sorry for not being able to commit it as I'm not a committer yet. :) > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11094-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 16:41:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10591 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 32251 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31998 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31986 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:41:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:41:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PGfKed019857 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:41:21 GMT Message-ID: <6533357.61451288024880905.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:41:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924625#action_12924625 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7006: ---------------------------------------- I've reviewed the patch, and it looks good to me. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11095-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 18:54:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78156 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 18:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 18:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 33915 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 18:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33793 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 18:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33785 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 18:54:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:54:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:54:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PIsJ0v022329 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:54:20 GMT Message-ID: <4604213.64351288032859734.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:54:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924680#action_12924680 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------------------- this patch looks good. +1 hdfs and mapreduce is already using the svn:externals to refer to the test-patch.sh script located in hadoop common. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11096-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:02:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80862 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 41641 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41584 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41576 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:02:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJ2LsK022648 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:02:22 GMT Message-ID: <19401211.64511288033341723.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:02:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley resolved HADOOP-7005. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: hudson) 0.22.0 Assignee: Nigel Daley Release Note: N/A I just committed this. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11097-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:22:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92282 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 69565 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69463 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69454 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:22:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:22:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJMK1O023081 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:22:20 GMT Message-ID: <16415448.64671288034540380.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:22:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924686#action_12924686 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #398 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/398/]) HADOOP-7005: Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master. Contributed by nigel. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11098-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:44:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99003 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 95636 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95568 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95560 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJiLXh023381 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:21 GMT Message-ID: <1578704.64951288035861606.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:44:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-7006: --------------------------------- Assignee: Chris Nauroth Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11099-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:44:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99055 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 95784 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95755 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95747 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJiKma023369 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:44:21 GMT Message-ID: <16426407.64911288035860659.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:44:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-7006: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7006.patch Tests failed for me until I also changed the file merge to sort the files. This is probably a good idea anyway. Here's a new version of the patch with that change. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11100-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:48:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1826 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 2969 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2864 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2856 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJmLXI023443 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:21 GMT Message-ID: <2969789.65001288036101093.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:48:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924693#action_12924693 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6985: -------------------------------------- This looks reasonable to me. It's arguably not back-compatible, since settings of HADOOP_OPTS would previously be ignored. Does that concern anyone? If not, I'll commit this. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11101-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 19:48:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1884 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 3086 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3047 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3039 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PJmMOZ023458 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:48:22 GMT Message-ID: <23234657.65051288036102147.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:48:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting reassigned HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11102-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 20:24:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20848 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 55760 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55736 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55728 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PKOJ46026593 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:20 GMT Message-ID: <6582704.65731288038259857.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:24:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924706#action_12924706 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #417 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/417/]) HADOOP-7005: Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master. Contributed by nigel. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11103-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:18:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42223 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16156 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16112 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16104 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:18:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:18:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLIRwN027595 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:18:27 GMT Message-ID: <9525389.66951288041507318.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:18:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Kling updated HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7001.patch Here is a new version of my patch. I have changed the interface Reconfigurable somewhat: Since only a subset of configuration properties can be changed at run time, it makes more sense to have an interface that allows us to change a single property at a time, rather than passing a Configuration object and then detecting all changes that need to be made. I have also added methods for detecting which configuration properties can be changed at runtime. {code} /** * Something whose {@link Configuration} can be changed at run time. */ public interface Reconfigurable extends Configurable { /** * Change a the configuration property on this object to the value specified. * * Change a the configuration property on this object to the value specified * and return the previous value that the configuration property was set to * (or null if it was not previously set). * * If the property cannot be changed, throw a * {@link ConfigurationChangeException}. */ public String changeConfProperty(String property, String newVal) throws ConfigurationChangeException; /** * Return whether a given property is changeable at run time. * * If isConfPropertyChangeable returns true for a property, * then changeConf should not throw an exception when changing * this property. */ public boolean isConfPropertyChangeable(String property); /** * Return all the properties that can be changed at run time. */ public List getChangeableConfProperties(); } {code} The patch also includes a simple servlet for changing the configuration of a Reconfigurable. In order to allow configuration changes at run time, I made all the getters and setters in Configuration synchronized. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11104-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:30:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46797 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:30:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:30:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 32174 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32118 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32086 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:30:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:30:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLUK9K027783 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:30:20 GMT Message-ID: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:30:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11105-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:34:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47828 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 35254 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35207 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35199 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:34:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:34:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLYMh6027849 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:34:22 GMT Message-ID: <232975.67251288042462231.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:34:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7007: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7007.patch > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11106-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:40:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49311 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 39787 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39749 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39736 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLeKdl027938 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:20 GMT Message-ID: <1911445.67351288042820407.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:40:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7007: --------------------------------------- Component/s: build Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan updating the jira with the right set to version and component > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11107-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:46:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51549 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 45345 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45317 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45309 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:46:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:46:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLkNTK028070 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:46:23 GMT Message-ID: <25120118.67581288043183662.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:46:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924738#action_12924738 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-7001: ------------------------------------------ I added Doug and Tom to the list of watchers. I am hoping that they provide some feedback to this JIRA. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11108-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:50:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52183 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 47132 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47102 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47094 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:50:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:50:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLoKC7028123 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:50:20 GMT Message-ID: <29311284.67641288043420546.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:50:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924740#action_12924740 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------------ +1, the setting of HADOOP_OPTS would have been ignored prior to this patch. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11109-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:52:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52467 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 48512 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48464 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48456 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:52:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:52:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLqKQB028146 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:52:20 GMT Message-ID: <9027374.67661288043540077.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:52:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7007: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch - is for the build.xml for common, hdfs and mapreduce projects HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch - is just for the common project, as test-patch.sh is reference by hdfs and mr by svn:extenals. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11110-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 21:56:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53497 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 52038 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51955 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51947 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:56:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:56:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PLuKDZ028225 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:56:20 GMT Message-ID: <27957391.67761288043780042.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:56:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924745#action_12924745 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7007: ------------------------------------- +1, looks good. Note that the unified patch (HADOOP-7007.patch) shouldn't be applied. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11111-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 22:14:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62197 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 66907 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66866 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66857 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:14:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PMEP4O028591 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:14:25 GMT Message-ID: <7805845.68161288044865009.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:14:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924755#action_12924755 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-7001: -------------------------------------- It doesn't seem unreasonable to me for some limited changes might be permitted without restarting. Restarting a namenode is not a lightweight operation. If the interface is 'Reconfigurable' then the method might be named 'reconfigureProp(String,String)', no? I don't like adding new interfaces that aren't yet used. So it might be good to file issues for at least one the daemons that you expect to implement this and at least draft those patches before this is committed. If we can't agree on some concrete usages of this interface within Hadoop, then there's no point in adding it. The servlet should probably return an HTTP error code when reconfiguration fails. A command-line client might be useful. Perhaps this will be added to, e.g.. the existing HDFS admin commands. But each command-line tool that uses this will share client-side HTTP call, handling of error codes, etc. So perhaps that should be encapsulated in a shared utility. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11112-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 22:22:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67765 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 22:22:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 22:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74015 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73980 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73968 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 22:22:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:22:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PMMK0h028682 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:22:20 GMT Message-ID: <33501972.68231288045340035.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:22:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6985: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed this. Thanks, Ramkumar. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11113-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 22:46:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75120 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 89450 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89345 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89337 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:46:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PMkKxs028982 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:46:20 GMT Message-ID: <23496849.68471288046780624.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:46:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924763#action_12924763 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-6985: -------------------------------------- Curious. bq. else FOO+=" -server"; fi Where is FOO being used? > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11114-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:04:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81704 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 5036 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4997 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4988 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:04:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:04:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN4KM7029301 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:04:20 GMT Message-ID: <30208748.68741288047860497.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:04:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali reopened HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------- Ugh! FOO -> HADOOP_OPTS Thats embarassing! > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11115-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:06:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86559 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 9895 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9856 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9847 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN6Ku8029339 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:21 GMT Message-ID: <27949714.68801288047980858.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:06:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6985.patch FOO->HADOOP_OPTS > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11116-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:06:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86609 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 10081 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10046 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10038 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN6LXt029354 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:21 GMT Message-ID: <19232474.68851288047981830.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:06:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6985.patch) > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6985.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11117-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:06:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86677 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10289 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10238 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10230 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN6MMm029369 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:06:22 GMT Message-ID: <27605347.68901288047982665.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:06:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6985.patch) > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11118-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:08:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87074 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 11270 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11245 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11237 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN8L98029406 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:21 GMT Message-ID: <7981731.68971288048100989.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:08:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP_6985.2.patch FOO -> HADOOP_OPTS > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11119-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:08:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87205 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 11976 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11946 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11938 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PN8MFY029430 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:08:22 GMT Message-ID: <15901950.69051288048102635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ramkumar Vadali (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Vadali updated HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11120-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:10:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88688 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 13923 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13836 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13828 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:10:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNAMYQ029472 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:10:22 GMT Message-ID: <17987193.69111288048222296.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:10:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-7007. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Patch committed. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11121-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:18:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91706 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 27383 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27352 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27344 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:18:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:18:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNINEr029603 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:18:23 GMT Message-ID: <26851743.69321288048703325.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:18:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6985: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11122-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:22:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92366 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 29195 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29155 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29147 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:22:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:22:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNMLgo029668 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:22:22 GMT Message-ID: <7419425.69411288048941842.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:22:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6916) Implement append operation for S3FileSystem In-Reply-To: <6991431.365871281969257661.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6916: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Marking as open while feedback is addressed. > Implement append operation for S3FileSystem > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6916 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6916 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Oleg Aleshko > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: s3_append1.patch > > > Currently org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem#append throws an IOException("Not supported"); > S3FileSystem should be able to support appending, possibly via common block storage logic. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11123-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:28:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95824 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:28:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:28:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 39109 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:28:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39069 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39061 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:28:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:28:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:28:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNSNuP029795 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:28:24 GMT Message-ID: <5059717.69661288049303860.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:28:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924781#action_12924781 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6317: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12457858/HADOOP-6317.patch against trunk revision 1027301. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/8//console This message is automatically generated. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11124-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:38:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98950 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 47471 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47447 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47439 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNcX3Y029908 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:38:34 GMT Message-ID: <32614174.69721288049913832.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:38:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Assignee: Kang Xiao Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks Kang Xiao! > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11125-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:59:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1930 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:59:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60163 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60088 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60080 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNwrt4000173 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:58:53 GMT Message-ID: <24302897.69861288051133156.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:58:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6663.patch > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11126-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:59:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2089 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:59:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 61205 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61168 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61137 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNwqTo000157 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:58:52 GMT Message-ID: <22183248.69811288051132369.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:58:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reopened HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------- Re-opening as there was a compilation problem. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11127-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Oct 25 23:59:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2293 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 23:59:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 62814 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62787 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62779 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 23:59:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:59:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9PNwupU000199 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:58:56 GMT Message-ID: <13255918.69941288051135984.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:58:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) Running updated patch through Hudson. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11128-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:10:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10383 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 71728 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71684 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71676 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0AN90000446 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:23 GMT Message-ID: <8032189.70181288051823156.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:10:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Milind Bhandarkar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924794#action_12924794 ] Milind Bhandarkar commented on HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------------- sorry, checked commits. looks like the correct version was committed, but comment was not updated. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11129-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:10:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10450 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:10:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 71991 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71959 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71951 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:10:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0AMaF000431 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:10:22 GMT Message-ID: <19676258.70131288051822378.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:10:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Milind Bhandarkar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924793#action_12924793 ] Milind Bhandarkar commented on HADOOP-6985: ------------------------------------------- so, which version was committed ? > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11130-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:24:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18887 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:24:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 83168 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83135 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83127 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0OWYO000601 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:32 GMT Message-ID: <475562.70241288052672385.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924796#action_12924796 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7007: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #399 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/399/]) HADOOP-7007: Update the hudson-test-patch ant target. Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11131-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:24:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18944 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 83352 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83323 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83315 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0OY6W000616 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:34 GMT Message-ID: <24969424.70291288052674005.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924797#action_12924797 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6985: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #399 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/399/]) HADOOP-6985. Fix example to make more sense. HADOOP-6985. Suggest that HADOOP-OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template. Contributed by Ramkumar Vadali. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11132-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:24:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18997 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 83550 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83507 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83499 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:24:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0OVYg000595 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:24:31 GMT Message-ID: <26148436.70221288052671556.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924795#action_12924795 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6663: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #399 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/399/]) Reverting HADOOP-6663. HADOOP-6663. BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file. Contributed by Kang Xiao. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11133-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:30:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22207 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 89372 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89292 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89284 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:30:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:30:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0UMTi000724 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:30:22 GMT Message-ID: <2515577.70431288053022168.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:30:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6317) Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys In-Reply-To: <985698151.1255715791730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924799#action_12924799 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6317: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12457858/HADOOP-6317.patch against trunk revision 1027316. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10//artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/10//console This message is automatically generated. > Serialize the 'final'ness of Configuration keys > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6317 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6317 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6317.2.patch, HADOOP-6317.3.patch, HADOOP-6317.4.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch, HADOOP-6317.patch > > > Currently Configuration.writeXml doesn't serialize the 'final' attribute. There are some scenarios where it is useful: > # TaskTracker should mark the tasks' 'localized' parameters as 'final' > # GUI tools -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11134-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 00:58:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28724 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 15038 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14999 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14991 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:58:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q0wMFc001198 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:58:22 GMT Message-ID: <4719108.70641288054702070.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:58:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kang Xiao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924803#action_12924803 ] Kang Xiao commented on HADOOP-6683: ----------------------------------- This optimization for zlibcompressor has been deployed in our cluster and works as expected. Is there any more work needed for this patch to be reviewed or resolved? > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11135-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 01:12:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36915 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 27689 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27648 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27640 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:12:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q1CLKw001417 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:12:21 GMT Message-ID: <30595442.70751288055540985.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924804#action_12924804 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6947: ------------------------------------- Ah, I misremembered, I guess we are in the same boat :) Hopefully someone else will pick this up and commit. Thanks Kan! > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11136-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 01:22:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39630 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 35849 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35816 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35807 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:22:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q1MMFB001565 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:22:22 GMT Message-ID: <24642748.70831288056142170.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:22:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924806#action_12924806 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7007: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #418 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/418/]) HADOOP-7007: Update the hudson-test-patch ant target. Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan. HADOOP-7007: Update the hudson-test-patch ant target. Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11137-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 01:38:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42702 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 46893 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46856 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46848 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:38:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:38:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q1cM9N003183 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:38:23 GMT Message-ID: <16878480.70941288057102911.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:38:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7008) Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7008 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Reporter: Nigel Daley test-patch.sh should be able to accept a properties file containing an acceptable number of findbugs and javadoc warnings. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11138-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 01:40:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42951 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 51605 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51579 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51571 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:40:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q1eJAu003216 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:40:20 GMT Message-ID: <28914818.70981288057219685.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7008) Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings In-Reply-To: <16878480.70941288057102911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7008: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7008.patch Attaching a patch for review. Giri, hoping you can review this. It hasn't been well tested yet. > Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Attachments: HADOOP-7008.patch > > > test-patch.sh should be able to accept a properties file containing an acceptable number of findbugs and javadoc warnings. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11139-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 02:04:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47144 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 69218 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69154 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69146 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:04:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:04:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q24Kc4003622 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:04:20 GMT Message-ID: <26387620.71321288058660456.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:04:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924817#action_12924817 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6991: --------------------------------------- +1 Ran the {{SequenceFile*}} unit tests in MapReduce, all passed. > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11140-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 02:32:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57260 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 02:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 02:32:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 86444 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 02:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86303 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 02:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86295 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 02:32:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:32:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q2WMZW004002 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:32:23 GMT Message-ID: <25269404.71641288060342804.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:32:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Kling updated HADOOP-7001: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7001.2.patch As suggested by Doug, I have renamed the methods in Reconfigurable. I have also renamed ConfigurationChangeException to ReconfigurationException and ConfigurationChangeServlet to ReconfigurationServlet to keep everything consistent. Please see HDFS-1477 for a patch that makes NameNode Reconfigurable and allows us to change 2 properties. The servlet now returns error code 500 if a change fails. A command line tool for changing configuration properties sounds like a good idea but I am not quite sure how to provide a generic version of such a tool. If the command line tool runs locally, very little functionality beyond calling the interface methods would be needed. Maybe it would be best to leave command line utilities to a later JIRA once it becomes more clear if there is a need for additional support. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.2.patch, HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11141-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 04:11:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84851 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 04:11:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 04:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 64711 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 04:11:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64558 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 04:11:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64545 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 04:11:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:11:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q4BOoJ005728 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:11:24 GMT Message-ID: <5049801.72321288066284092.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:11:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924832#action_12924832 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7001: ------------------------------------- I'm not sold on the interface being one of "set conf var 'foo' to value 'bar'". Internally, this seems fine, but exposing this as a servlet seems like it will encourage the case where runtime configuration diverges from what's in the XML configuration files on disk. Could we instead have the servlet/API be more similar to the existing refresh* functions, where it reloads the configuration off disk, and applies a diff? I'm imagining the servlet would show you a "preview" of the diff to be applied, along with a list of warnings for configuration variables that have been changed on disk but are *not* reconfigurable. Then the administrator can hit an "apply" button to reconfigure the settings that are reconfigurable. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.2.patch, HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11142-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 05:33:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2104 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 05:33:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 05:33:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 3790 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 05:33:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3696 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 05:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3686 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 05:33:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:33:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:33:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9Q5XRmi006856 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:33:27 GMT Message-ID: <9618115.73201288071207106.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:33:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924842#action_12924842 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7001: -------------------------------------------- I'd also prefer a refresh request that forces a reload of the config from disk. To detect diffs a memory copy of the current config could be used. Properties in the configuration XML should be flagged as *reconfigurable* (similar to *final*), if a property is not flagged as *reconfigurable* hot changes for that property are ignored and are not communicated via the Property listener (have you considered using the PropertyChangeListener API from the JDK?). > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.2.patch, HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11143-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 13:08:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9507 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 13:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 94693 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94621 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94612 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QD8Vd3014357 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:31 GMT Message-ID: <8444150.78891288098511020.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924956#action_12924956 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7007: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #493 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/493/]) HADOOP-7007: Update the hudson-test-patch ant target. Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan. > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11144-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 13:08:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9562 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 94864 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94668 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94604 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:50 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QD8UL3014339 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:30 GMT Message-ID: <8519300.78831288098510024.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924954#action_12924954 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6663: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #493 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/493/]) Reverting HADOOP-6663. HADOOP-6663. BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file. Contributed by Kang Xiao. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11145-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 13:08:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9586 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 95042 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94867 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94624 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:51 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QD8VYQ014372 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:31 GMT Message-ID: <16731606.78941288098511807.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6985) Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template In-Reply-To: <26576141.536571286224772607.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924957#action_12924957 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6985: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #493 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/493/]) HADOOP-6985. Fix example to make more sense. HADOOP-6985. Suggest that HADOOP-OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template. Contributed by Ramkumar Vadali. > Suggest that HADOOP_OPTS be preserved in hadoop-env.sh.template > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6985 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ramkumar Vadali > Assignee: Ramkumar Vadali > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP_6985.2.patch > > > For an administrator who wants to customize HADOOP_OPTS, it would be better to have > # if [ "$HADOOP_OPTS" == "" ]; then export HADOOP_OPTS=-server; else FOO+=" -server"; fi > instead of > # Extra Java runtime options. Empty by default. > # export HADOOP_OPTS=-server -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11146-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 13:08:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9604 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 13:08:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 95220 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95061 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94816 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QD8UL9014351 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:30 GMT Message-ID: <19746442.78871288098510736.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924955#action_12924955 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #493 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/493/]) HADOOP-7005: Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master. Contributed by nigel. > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11147-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:06:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50904 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:06:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:06:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 99934 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:06:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99892 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99884 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:06:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QH6QJJ018465 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:06:26 GMT Message-ID: <26268812.82581288112786251.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:06:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6947: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks Todd! > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11148-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:08:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51436 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8288 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8221 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8124 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:08:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:08:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QH8MQ0018502 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:08:22 GMT Message-ID: <29723996.82631288112902783.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925042#action_12925042 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6954: ----------------------------------- Here are the results of running test-patch: {noformat} [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {noformat} > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11149-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:12:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53087 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:12:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11460 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11431 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11423 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:12:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:12:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:12:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHCOBX018577 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:12:24 GMT Message-ID: <10633354.82721288113144094.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:12:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Nauroth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925045#action_12925045 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HADOOP-7006: --------------------------------------- Thanks, Aaron and Doug. I'm following the directions from http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute . I don't see the "Submit Patch" link to trigger Hudson though. Is there something else that I need to do? > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11150-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:18:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59068 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23466 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23420 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23362 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:18:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:18:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHINiu018712 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:18:23 GMT Message-ID: <14989088.82871288113503784.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:18:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6954: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11151-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:22:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60953 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 27853 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:22:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27813 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:22:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27805 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:22:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:22:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:22:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHMOH0018821 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:22:25 GMT Message-ID: <3514825.83091288113744946.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:22:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925053#action_12925053 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7006: ---------------------------------------- Doug already marked the ticket patch available. Not quite sure why Hudson hasn't picked it up yet - might just be taking some time to get around to it (the HDFS tests take quite a while to run.) > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11152-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:28:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65012 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:28:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 37781 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:28:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37746 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37716 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:28:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:28:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:28:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHSLeP018982 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:28:21 GMT Message-ID: <26879604.83321288114101567.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:28:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925055#action_12925055 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6947: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #400 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/400/]) HADOOP-6947. Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11153-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:32:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70252 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:32:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:32:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 48915 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:32:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48824 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:32:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48816 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:32:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHWKm5019333 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:32:20 GMT Message-ID: <31195542.83341288114340062.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:32:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-6724. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 0.20.3 I ran test-patch and committed this to branch 20. > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.22.0, 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6724-20-1.patch, hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11154-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 17:46:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79867 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 17:46:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 17:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 75943 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:46:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75832 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 17:46:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75824 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 17:46:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:46:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:46:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QHkKNS019707 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:46:20 GMT Message-ID: <12905109.83411288115180063.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:46:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925058#action_12925058 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6954: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #401 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/401/]) HADOOP-6954. Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository. > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11155-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 18:57:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21684 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 18:57:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 18:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 94510 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 18:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94483 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 18:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94475 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 18:57:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:57:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QIvNbn023104 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:57:24 GMT Message-ID: <26457473.85351288119443917.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:57:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6757) NullPointerException for hadoop clients launched from streaming tasks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6757: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Marking as open while Sharad's comment is addressed. > NullPointerException for hadoop clients launched from streaming tasks > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6757 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Amar Kamat > Assignee: Amar Kamat > Attachments: BZ-3620565-v1.0.patch, HADOOP-6757-v1.0.patch > > > TaskRunner sets HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER to info,TLA while launching the child tasks. TLA implicitly assumes that that task-id information will be made available via the 'hadoop.tasklog.taskid' parameter. 'hadoop.tasklog.taskid' is passed to the child task by the TaskRunner via HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS. When the streaming task launches a hadoop client (say hadoop job -list), the HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER of the hadoop client is set to 'info,TLA' but hadoop.tasklog.taskid is not set resulting into NPE. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11156-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 19:30:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33637 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 64197 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64169 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64161 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:30:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QJUKsQ023711 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:30:20 GMT Message-ID: <13861625.86011288121420391.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:30:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925099#action_12925099 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-7006: -------------------------------------- Ran test-patch by hand. {code} -1 overall. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {code} The javadoc test seems broken, as it fails even when I run test-patch with an empty patch file. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11157-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 19:34:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34811 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 70887 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70845 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70837 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:34:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QJYNFo023765 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:34:24 GMT Message-ID: <12537211.86071288121663946.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:34:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925101#action_12925101 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6724: --------------------------------------- Why didn't you apply this to 0.21? > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6724-20-1.patch, hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11158-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:17:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70272 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 58060 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58029 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58021 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:17:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QLHLH6025583 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:17:22 GMT Message-ID: <19824466.88161288127841887.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:17:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-7006: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Chris! > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11159-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71834 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 70689 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70655 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70647 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:27:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:27:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QLRO92025730 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:27:24 GMT Message-ID: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:27:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7009 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.22.0 MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11160-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:33:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73786 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 78398 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78240 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78232 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:33:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QLXM0I025823 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:33:22 GMT Message-ID: <26577612.88391288128801994.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:33:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-7009: ---------------------------------- Attachment: md5hash.patch Here is a simple patch that does this. > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11161-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:45:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76868 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 95558 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95526 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95518 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:45:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QLjRlM026140 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:45:27 GMT Message-ID: <11286474.88981288129527669.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:45:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925159#action_12925159 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7006: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #402 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/402/]) HADOOP-7006. Fix 'fs -getmerge' command to not be a no-op. Contributed by Chris Nauroth. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11162-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Oct 26 21:53:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80008 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 10436 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10403 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10395 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:53:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QLrMXD026288 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:53:24 GMT Message-ID: <7608273.89221288130002110.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:53:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925163#action_12925163 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6724: ------------------------------------- Because it was already committed to the 21 branch. > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6724-20-1.patch, hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11163-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 11:23:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55502 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 45139 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44954 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44945 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RBNN92009556 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:23 GMT Message-ID: <9894942.97691288178603234.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:23:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6947) Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true In-Reply-To: <15312872.90501284007413131.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925328#action_12925328 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6947: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #494 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/494/]) HADOOP-6947. Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > Kerberos relogin should set refreshKrb5Config to true > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6947 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6947-branch20.txt, hadoop-6947.txt > > > In working on securing a daemon that uses two different principals from different threads, I found that I wasn't able to login from a second keytab after I'd logged in from the first. This is because we don't set the refreshKrb5Config in the Configuration for the Krb5LoginModule - hence it won't switch over to the correct keytab file if it's different than the first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11164-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 11:23:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55540 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 11:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45187 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44976 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44963 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RBNOjL009574 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:24 GMT Message-ID: <6529809.97751288178604903.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:23:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7006) hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. In-Reply-To: <21950654.54351287988881239.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925330#action_12925330 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7006: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #494 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/494/]) HADOOP-7006. Fix 'fs -getmerge' command to not be a no-op. Contributed by Chris Nauroth. > hadoop fs -getmerge does not work using codebase from trunk. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7006 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7006 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Nauroth > Assignee: Chris Nauroth > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7006.patch, HADOOP-7006.patch > > > Running the codebase from trunk, the hadoop fs -getmerge command does not work. As implemented in prior versions (i.e. 0.20.2), I could run hadoop fs -getmerge pointed at a directory containing multiple files. It would merge all files into a single file on the local file system. Running the same command using the codebase from trunk, it looks like nothing happens. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11165-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 11:23:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55550 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 11:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45283 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45154 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45145 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RBNNqM009562 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:23:23 GMT Message-ID: <18595872.97711288178603714.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:23:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6954) Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository In-Reply-To: <19843693.216391284595892946.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925329#action_12925329 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6954: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #494 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/494/]) HADOOP-6954. Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository. > Sources JARs are not correctly published to the Maven repository > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6954 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6954 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6954.patch > > > When you try to "close" the staging repository to make it visible to the public the operation fails (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1292?focusedCommentId=12909953&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12909953 for the type of error). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11168-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 16:41:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1410 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 16:41:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 16:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 77904 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:35:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74526 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64997 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 15:34:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RFYLmm018724 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:21 GMT Message-ID: <18878677.101321288193661432.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:34:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao updated HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7010.patch Patch available. > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11166-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 16:41:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2313 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 16:41:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 16:41:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 78652 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:35:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67736 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65127 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 15:36:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:36:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:36:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RFaK69018757 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:36:21 GMT Message-ID: <14731951.101341288193780815.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:36:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao updated HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11167-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 16:41:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2649 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 16:41:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 16:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 78869 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:36:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71330 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 16:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64993 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 15:34:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RFYJ6U018706 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:19 GMT Message-ID: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:34:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Typo in FileSystem.java ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-7010 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Jingguo Yao Priority: Minor Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11169-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 19:45:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16125 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 19:45:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 19:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 19590 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 19:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19550 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 19:45:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19520 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 19:45:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:45:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:45:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RJjKMG022931 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:45:20 GMT Message-ID: <2032276.105871288208720568.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:45:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7011) KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE --------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers The main method of KerberosName attempts to do short name translation before calling KerberosName.setConfiguration(...). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11170-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 21:56:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60118 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 11532 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11499 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11491 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RLuKot024940 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:20 GMT Message-ID: <24875557.107991288216580255.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:56:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7011) KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE In-Reply-To: <2032276.105871288208720568.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7011: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7011.0.txt > KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7011.0.txt > > > The main method of KerberosName attempts to do short name translation before calling KerberosName.setConfiguration(...). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11171-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Oct 27 21:56:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60150 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 11726 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11678 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11670 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9RLuKdP024949 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:56:20 GMT Message-ID: <29290182.108021288216580868.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:56:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7011) KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE In-Reply-To: <2032276.105871288208720568.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7011: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7011.0.txt > > > The main method of KerberosName attempts to do short name translation before calling KerberosName.setConfiguration(...). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11172-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 01:55:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62732 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 45867 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45721 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45713 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S1tOOp003376 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:24 GMT Message-ID: <29727295.111011288230924025.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:55:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11173-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 02:02:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65350 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 02:02:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 02:02:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 47126 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47060 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46123 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 01:55:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S1tNHn003370 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:23 GMT Message-ID: <21113646.110991288230923478.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:55:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 I've committed this to trunk. Thanks Jingguo. > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11174-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 02:25:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74794 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 71699 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71671 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71663 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S2PKJn021120 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:20 GMT Message-ID: <1219800.111341288232720401.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:25:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925659#action_12925659 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7009: ------------------------------------- +1 Nit: getDigester needs a javadoc, and perhaps a name that suggests it returns a thread local? > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11175-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 02:25:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74813 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 71957 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71851 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71810 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S2PL5G021138 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:25:21 GMT Message-ID: <29264328.111361288232721110.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:25:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925660#action_12925660 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #403 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/403/]) HADOOP-7010. Typo in FileSystem.java. Contributed by Jingguo Yao. > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11176-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 04:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28250 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 04:27:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 04:27:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 47629 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 04:27:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47470 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 04:27:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47462 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 04:27:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:27:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:27:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S4RP9B029210 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:27:25 GMT Message-ID: <21914114.112221288240045251.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:27:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes In-Reply-To: <33220874.146971287081516580.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925684#action_12925684 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-7001: ------------------------------------------ I too like the idea of having "bin/hadoop dfs -refreshConfig" that will reload the config from the conf file, diff the newly read ones with the ones in the NameNode. If the only ones that are different are Recofinfigurable, then the refreshConfig command will be successful, otherwise it is an error. The servlet could take a similar approach. > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.2.patch, HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11177-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 04:47:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33750 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 04:47:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 04:47:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 56501 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 04:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56342 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 04:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56334 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 04:47:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:47:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:47:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S4lKuB029323 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:47:20 GMT Message-ID: <9693068.112321288241240245.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:47:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7008) Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings In-Reply-To: <16878480.70941288057102911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925687#action_12925687 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7008: -------------------------------------------- comments: 1) we should add OK_RELEASEAUDIT_WARNINGS to the properties file.. 2) Every project should define these numbers even if the project has zero warnings for findbugs/releaseaudit/javadoc. Thatway we dont have to pre-build the trunk to determine the numbers. 3) HADOOP-7008.patch patch seem to run findbug on trunk if the OK_FINDBUGS_WARNINGS is not defined or the warnings not equal to zero. Is there any reason why we are running findbugs if its already defined? I think all the projects should just define the values for these 3 properties. test-patch.sh should directly apply the patch and determine the warnings and do a +1 or -1 (if the numbers are greater than the numbers defined in the properties file.) > Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Attachments: HADOOP-7008.patch > > > test-patch.sh should be able to accept a properties file containing an acceptable number of findbugs and javadoc warnings. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11178-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 05:46:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50767 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 05:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 86289 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86132 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86124 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 05:46:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:46:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:46:25 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S5k5SW029802 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:46:05 GMT Message-ID: <29379978.113071288244765262.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:46:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-7009: ---------------------------------- Attachment: md5hash1.patch Eli, thanks for your review! This patch adds javadoc to the method. > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11179-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 06:24:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72803 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 06:24:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 06:24:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 23470 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 06:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23308 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 06:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23296 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 06:24:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S6O5eR001029 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:05 GMT Message-ID: <18402718.116331288247045737.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:24:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925707#action_12925707 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-7009: --------------------------------------- [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appe [exec] ar to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. [exec] > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11180-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 06:52:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80758 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 06:52:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 06:52:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 52099 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 06:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51941 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 06:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51933 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 06:52:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:52:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S6q5au001294 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:52:05 GMT Message-ID: <26358414.116861288248725215.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:52:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925722#action_12925722 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-7009: --------------------------------------- All unit tests were passed. All 6 javadoc warnings are security-related and are unrelated to this patch. The patch is too trivial to have a unit test. I will commit it. > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11181-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 08:44:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35941 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 08:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 08:44:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 69750 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 08:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69644 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 08:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69636 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 08:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:44:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S8i616002272 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:44:06 GMT Message-ID: <20466061.118031288255446457.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:44:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7008) Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings In-Reply-To: <16878480.70941288057102911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7008: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7008-V1.patch V1 patch address the comments. > Enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7008 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7008 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Attachments: HADOOP-7008-V1.patch, HADOOP-7008.patch > > > test-patch.sh should be able to accept a properties file containing an acceptable number of findbugs and javadoc warnings. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11182-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 09:56:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75075 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 09:56:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 09:56:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 60226 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:56:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60174 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:56:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60166 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 09:56:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:56:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:56:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S9uLkn003098 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:56:22 GMT Message-ID: <18244450.119111288259781768.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:56:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "tom liu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7012) IPC.Client may have some connection for each a given host/port MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org IPC.Client may have some connection for each a given host/port -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7012 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7012 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Environment: JDK1.6.0_17/Tomcat6 Reporter: tom liu ipc.Client class holds connection pool, that connection would be reused for a given host/port. and WritableRpcEngine holds Client pool, that client would be reused for a given SocketFactory. so, RPC.getProxy method returns proxy object, that only hold one connection or socket connected to a host/port, if or not, we create many proxy objects. if large requests are sent to RPC Server through proxy, the request would be wait long time to be sent. i think, for each host/port, ipc.Client would hold many connections. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11183-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 09:58:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75405 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 09:58:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 09:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 64358 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64161 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 09:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63906 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 09:58:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:58:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9S9wNpi003112 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:58:23 GMT Message-ID: <29319698.119141288259903361.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:58:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "tom liu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7012) IPC.Client may have some connections for each given host/port In-Reply-To: <18244450.119111288259781768.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] tom liu updated HADOOP-7012: ---------------------------- Summary: IPC.Client may have some connections for each given host/port (was: IPC.Client may have some connection for each a given host/port) > IPC.Client may have some connections for each given host/port > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Environment: JDK1.6.0_17/Tomcat6 > Reporter: tom liu > > ipc.Client class holds connection pool, that connection would be reused for a given host/port. > and WritableRpcEngine holds Client pool, that client would be reused for a given SocketFactory. > so, RPC.getProxy method returns proxy object, that only hold one connection or socket connected to a host/port, if or not, we create many proxy objects. > if large requests are sent to RPC Server through proxy, the request would be wait long time to be sent. > i think, for each host/port, ipc.Client would hold many connections. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11184-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 11:22:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12840 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 64754 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 11:22:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64602 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 11:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64594 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 11:22:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:22:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:22:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SBMNMn007654 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:22:23 GMT Message-ID: <20199517.119651288264943497.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:22:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7010) Typo in FileSystem.java In-Reply-To: <26367340.101261288193659612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925778#action_12925778 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7010: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #495 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/495/]) HADOOP-7010. Typo in FileSystem.java. Contributed by Jingguo Yao. > Typo in FileSystem.java > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7010.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.08h > Remaining Estimate: 0.08h > > For the Javadoc for getLocal method, "Get the local file syste" should be "Get the local file system.". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11185-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 17:16:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48648 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 17:16:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 17:16:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 33509 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:16:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33398 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:16:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33386 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 17:16:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:16:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:16:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SHGWnJ011102 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:16:32 GMT Message-ID: <11857712.123921288286192577.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:16:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925875#action_12925875 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6663: ----------------------------------- I ran the tests and test-patch manually: {noformat} [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system tests framework. The patch passed system tests framework compile. {noformat} > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11186-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 17:18:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49326 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 35069 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35017 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:18:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35009 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 17:18:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:18:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:18:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SHIbBX011148 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:18:37 GMT Message-ID: <15819198.124061288286317083.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:18:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11187-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 17:38:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61918 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 62727 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62698 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62690 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:38:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:38:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SHcR19011389 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:38:28 GMT Message-ID: <9231331.124601288287507951.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:38:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925888#action_12925888 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6663: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #404 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/404/]) HADOOP-6663. BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file. Contributed by Kang Xiao. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11188-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 18:52:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13230 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 64170 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64030 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64022 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:52:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:52:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SIqLDa012111 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:52:21 GMT Message-ID: <27723498.125621288291941562.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:52:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang resolved HADOOP-7009. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I've committed this! > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11189-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 19:14:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28356 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 19:14:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 19:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 87863 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 19:14:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87799 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 19:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87791 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 19:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:14:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:14:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SJEK8L012373 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:14:21 GMT Message-ID: <1977043.126031288293260939.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:14:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925917#action_12925917 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7009: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #405 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/405/]) HADOOP-7009. MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest. Contributed by Hairong Kuang. > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11190-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 20:55:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67901 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 90497 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90339 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90331 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:55:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SKtNiM013183 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:55:24 GMT Message-ID: <28742743.127101288299323666.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:55:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-6991: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Chris Douglas > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11191-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 20:57:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70146 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 93347 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93203 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93195 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SKvK97013202 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:20 GMT Message-ID: <22937827.127131288299440826.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:57:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6991: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Chris! > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11192-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 21:21:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87097 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 27848 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27749 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27741 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:21:40 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SLLKOE013464 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:21:20 GMT Message-ID: <29057905.127421288300880006.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:21:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925950#action_12925950 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6991: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #407 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/407/]) HADOOP-6991. Fix SequenceFile::Reader to honor file lengths and call openFile (cdouglas via omalley) > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11193-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 23:11:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61132 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 80490 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80447 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80439 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:11:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SNBL8F014455 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:11:21 GMT Message-ID: <3217110.128951288307481096.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:11:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Kling (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7013) Add boolean field isCorrupt to BlockLocation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add boolean field isCorrupt to BlockLocation -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7013 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Patrick Kling This is needed to allow DFSClient.getBlockLocations to notify the calling application when returning a BlockLocation that corresponds to a corrupt block. Currently, this happens when there are no uncorrupted replicas of a requested block. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11194-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Oct 28 23:49:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76169 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2010 23:49:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 23:49:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 29057 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:49:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29031 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2010 23:49:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29023 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2010 23:49:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:49:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:49:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9SNnPB9014801 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:49:25 GMT Message-ID: <19505596.129651288309765035.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:49:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6996) Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name In-Reply-To: <1541599.80951286821892815.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6996: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this! > Allow CodecFactory to return a codec object given a codec' class name > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6996 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6996 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getCodecByClassName.patch > > > CodecFactory specify the list of codec that are supported by Hadoop. However, it returns a codec only by a file's name. I would like to make getCodec method to alternatively take a codec's class name. > This is required by HDFS-1435, where > 1. it allows an HDFS admin to configure which codec to use to save an image. > 2. It stores the codec class name in its on-disk image instead of a file's suffix. > When saving and reading an image, I'd like to get an codec from CodecFactory by its class name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11195-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 00:49:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7891 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 80140 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80027 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80019 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:49:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:49:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T0nKFe015265 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:49:20 GMT Message-ID: <21599126.130371288313360183.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:49:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6977: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6977.patch Addressing good finding Boris made at HDFS-1408. > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11196-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:06:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44533 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 35883 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35846 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35787 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:39 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26IlY016443 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:18 GMT Message-ID: <10468298.133111288317978213.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6873) using delegation token over hftp for long running clients (part of hdfs 1296) In-Reply-To: <3672204.508361279757392441.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926090#action_12926090 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6873: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > using delegation token over hftp for long running clients (part of hdfs 1296) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6873 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6873 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6873-2.patch, HADOOP-6873.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11197-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:06:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44799 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:06:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 36592 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36555 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36547 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:43 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26LYd016504 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:21 GMT Message-ID: <13980391.133311288317981791.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6826) Revert FileSystem create method that takes CreateFlags In-Reply-To: <6937853.16451276636883446.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926097#action_12926097 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6826: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Revert FileSystem create method that takes CreateFlags > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6826 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6826 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6826.patch > > > As discussed in HDFS-609 and HADOOP-5438 we should back out the FileSystem create() method that takes a set of CreateFlag objects, until the interface has been agreed upon and fully tested. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11198-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:06:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45032 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 37419 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37383 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37375 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26NmE016537 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:23 GMT Message-ID: <20762671.133421288317983744.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926101#action_12926101 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6991: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11199-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46034 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 40412 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40378 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40368 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26rl1017025 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:53 GMT Message-ID: <32953749.135041288318013800.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7003) Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool In-Reply-To: <30184462.19001287608066472.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926127#action_12926127 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7003: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Fix hadoop patch testing using jira_cli tool > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7003 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: hudson > > Attachments: hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh, hudsonPatchQueueAdmin.sh > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11200-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46123 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 40729 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40699 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40691 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26tnA017052 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:55 GMT Message-ID: <24557971.135131288318015025.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7005) Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master In-Reply-To: <17555034.54181287988399911.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926129#action_12926129 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7005: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Update test-patch.sh to remove callback to Hudson master > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7005 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7005 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7005.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11201-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46156 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 40908 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40882 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40873 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26ql2016985 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:52 GMT Message-ID: <12528441.134911288318011994.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6632) Support for using different Kerberos keys for different instances of Hadoop services In-Reply-To: <1542465557.251491268540967230.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926125#action_12926125 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6632: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Support for using different Kerberos keys for different instances of Hadoop services > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6632 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6632 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6632.mr.patch, c6632-05.patch, c6632-07.patch, HADOOP-6632-Y20S-18.patch, HADOOP-6632-Y20S-22.patch > > > We tested using the same Kerberos key for all datanodes in a HDFS cluster or the same Kerberos key for all TaskTarckers in a MapRed cluster. But it doesn't work. The reason is that when datanodes try to authenticate to the namenode all at once, the Kerberos authenticators they send to the namenode may have the same timestamp and will be rejected as replay requests. This JIRA makes it possible to use a unique key for each service instance. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11202-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46202 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 41244 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41202 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41180 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26tCx017064 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:55 GMT Message-ID: <2972773.135171288318015560.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6845) TokenStorage renamed to Credentials. In-Reply-To: <11027372.98871277758850634.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926131#action_12926131 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6845: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > TokenStorage renamed to Credentials. > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6845 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6845 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6845.1.patch, HADOOP-6845.2.patch, HADOOP-6845.3.patch > > > This jira tracks common changes for MAPREDUCE-1528. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11203-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46423 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 41728 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41696 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41688 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T26thJ017070 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:06:55 GMT Message-ID: <24499031.135191288318015845.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7007) update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. In-Reply-To: <7411320.67141288042220266.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926132#action_12926132 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7007: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > update the hudson-test-patch target to work with the latest test-patch script. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7007 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7007 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7007-build.xml.patch, HADOOP-7007-test-patch.patch, HADOOP-7007.patch > > > The hudson-test-patch target has to be updated to work with the current test-patch.sh script. Since the callback login in the test-patch.sh is removed. by hadoop-7005 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11204-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 02:07:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46694 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 02:07:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 42655 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42608 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42600 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 02:07:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:21 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9T271bK017169 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:07:01 GMT Message-ID: <20818307.135521288318021319.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:07:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6786) test-patch needs to verify Herriot integrity In-Reply-To: <19336182.46451274829212745.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926140#action_12926140 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6786: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/523/]) > test-patch needs to verify Herriot integrity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6786 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6786 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6786.patch, HADOOP-6786.patch, HADOOP-6786.patch > > > Whenever a new patch is submitted for verification {{test-patch}} process has to make sure that none of Herriot bindings were broken. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11205-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 11:22:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35778 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11400 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11240 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11232 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TBMNKm023591 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:23 GMT Message-ID: <11097044.139871288351343310.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:22:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6991) SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile In-Reply-To: <22609732.541901286245712924.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926239#action_12926239 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6991: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #496 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/496/]) HADOOP-6991. Fix SequenceFile::Reader to honor file lengths and call openFile (cdouglas via omalley) HADOOP-6991. Move testcase from mapreduce to common, since it tests SequenceFile. > SequenceFile::Reader discards length for files, does not call openFile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6991 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6991 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6991-0.patch, 6991-1.patch, h-6991-2.patch > > > While the sorting and merging in {{SequenceFile}} is deprecated and {{openFile}} is archaic, the semantics should remain consistent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11206-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 11:22:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35879 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11994 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11974 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11958 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TBMYt4023603 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:34 GMT Message-ID: <6255850.139911288351354912.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:22:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926240#action_12926240 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6663: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #496 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/496/]) HADOOP-6663. BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file. Contributed by Kang Xiao. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Assignee: Kang Xiao > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch, HADOOP-6663.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11207-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 11:23:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35909 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 12186 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12001 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11965 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 11:22:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TBMZcA023612 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:22:35 GMT Message-ID: <20189203.139941288351355378.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:22:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7009) MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest In-Reply-To: <246488.88311288128444362.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926241#action_12926241 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7009: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #496 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/496/]) HADOOP-7009. MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest. Contributed by Hairong Kuang. > MD5Hash provides a public factory method that creates an instance of MessageDigest > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7009 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: md5hash.patch, md5hash1.patch > > > MD5Hash has a private way of creating a MessageDigest object that's thread local. I'd like to have such a method which is public so that checksuming fsimage (HDFS-903) could use it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11208-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 19:28:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18651 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 64410 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64388 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64380 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 19:28:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:28:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:28:44 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TJSNSS029586 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:28:23 GMT Message-ID: <1387343.148221288380503431.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:28:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Gerald Guo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6953) start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set In-Reply-To: <4106516.214881284590314802.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926418#action_12926418 ] Gerald Guo commented on HADOOP-6953: ------------------------------------ You can add following code to files "hdfs-config.sh" and "mapred-config.sh". this="${BASH_SOURCE-$0}" while [ -h "$this" ]; do ls=`ls -ld "$this"` link=`expr "$ls" : '.*-> \(.*\)$'` if expr "$link" : '.*/.*' > /dev/null; then this="$link" else this=`dirname "$this"`/"$link" fi done # convert relative path to absolute path common_bin=`dirname "$this"` script=`basename "$this"` common_bin=`cd "$common_bin"; pwd` this="$common_bin/$script" # the root of the Hadoop installation #TODO: change the env variable when dir structure is changed export HADOOP_HOME=`dirname "$this"`/.. export HADOOP_COMMON_HOME="${HADOOP_HOME}" > start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > > If the HADOOP_HOME environment variable is not set then the start and stop scripts for HDFS and MapReduce fail with "Hadoop common not found.". The start-all.sh and stop-all.sh scripts are not affected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11209-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 19:32:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19759 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 70012 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69978 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69969 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TJWNEo029639 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:23 GMT Message-ID: <15769023.148351288380743351.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:32:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Gerald Guo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6953) start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set In-Reply-To: <4106516.214881284590314802.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926421#action_12926421 ] Gerald Guo commented on HADOOP-6953: ------------------------------------ Sorry for the weird formatting in my last comment. this="${BASH_SOURCE-$0}" while [ -h "$this" ]; do ls=`ls -ld "$this"` link=`expr "$ls" : '.*-> \(.*\)$'` if expr "$link" : '.*/.*' > /dev/null; then this="$link" else this=`dirname "$this"`/"$link" fi done \# convert relative path to absolute path common_bin=`dirname "$this"` script=`basename "$this"` common_bin=`cd "$common_bin"; pwd` this="$common_bin/$script" \# the root of the Hadoop installation \#TODO: change the env variable when dir structure is changed export HADOOP_HOME=`dirname "$this"`/.. export HADOOP_COMMON_HOME="${HADOOP_HOME}" > start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > > If the HADOOP_HOME environment variable is not set then the start and stop scripts for HDFS and MapReduce fail with "Hadoop common not found.". The start-all.sh and stop-all.sh scripts are not affected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11210-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 21:08:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65002 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 96639 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96610 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96602 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:08:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:08:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TL8MEV000733 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:08:22 GMT Message-ID: <6667763.150251288386502076.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6990) Move TestSequenceFile from MapReduce to Common In-Reply-To: <23983344.541871286245592779.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas resolved HADOOP-6990. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Fixed in HADOOP-6991 > Move TestSequenceFile from MapReduce to Common > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6990 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6990 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Trivial > > {{TestSequenceFile}} escaped from Common and ended up in the MapReduce tree, causing several regressions in {{SequenceFile}} to go unnoticed -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11211-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Oct 29 22:57:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97799 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 97546 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97504 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97496 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:57:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9TMvKAU001694 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:57:20 GMT Message-ID: <23645476.151831288393040910.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:57:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7011) KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE In-Reply-To: <2032276.105871288208720568.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-7011: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) This looks right to me & tests pass. Nothing appears to call this, so it's just useful for debugging, but still worth fixing. I committed this. Thanks, Aaron! > KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7011.0.txt > > > The main method of KerberosName attempts to do short name translation before calling KerberosName.setConfiguration(...). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11212-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 04:12:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27538 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 04:12:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 04:12:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 15485 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 04:12:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15322 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 04:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15314 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 04:12:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:12:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:12:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9U4CKT4005223 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:12:20 GMT Message-ID: <14414782.154171288411940612.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7014) Generalize CLITest structure and interfaces to faciliate upstream adoption (e.g. for web testing) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Generalize CLITest structure and interfaces to faciliate upstream adoption (e.g. for web testing) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7014 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7014 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik There's at least one use case where TestCLI infrastructure is helpful for testing projects outside of core Hadoop (e.g. Owl web testing). In order to make this acceptance easier for upstream project TestCLI needs to be refactored. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11213-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 04:22:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28829 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 04:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 04:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 20562 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 04:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20405 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 04:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20397 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 04:22:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:22:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:22:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9U4MN03005305 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:22:23 GMT Message-ID: <30942355.154301288412543444.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:22:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7014) Generalize CLITest structure and interfaces to faciliate upstream adoption (e.g. for web testing) In-Reply-To: <14414782.154171288411940612.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7014: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7014.patch Fix. > Generalize CLITest structure and interfaces to faciliate upstream adoption (e.g. for web testing) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7014 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7014 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7014.patch > > > There's at least one use case where TestCLI infrastructure is helpful for testing projects outside of core Hadoop (e.g. Owl web testing). In order to make this acceptance easier for upstream project TestCLI needs to be refactored. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11214-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Oct 30 11:22:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79502 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 11:22:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 11:22:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 16716 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 11:22:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16549 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 11:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16541 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 11:22:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:22:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:22:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9UBMLQE015152 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:22:21 GMT Message-ID: <2835121.155971288437741171.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:22:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7011) KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE In-Reply-To: <2032276.105871288208720568.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926565#action_12926565 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7011: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #497 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/497/]) HADOOP-7011. Fix KerberosName.main() to not throw an NPE. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. > KerberosName.main(...) throws NPE > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7011 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7011 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7011.0.txt > > > The main method of KerberosName attempts to do short name translation before calling KerberosName.setConfiguration(...). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11215-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Oct 31 04:49:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21632 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2010 04:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2010 04:49:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 85881 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2010 04:49:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85719 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2010 04:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85710 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2010 04:49:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:49:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:49:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9V4nK68010158 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:49:20 GMT Message-ID: <32009476.160611288500560055.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:49:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6977) Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926679#action_12926679 ] Boris Shkolnik commented on HADOOP-6977: ---------------------------------------- +1 for latest change > Herriot daemon clients should vend statistics > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6977 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6977 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: FinderTest.java, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch, HADOOP-6977.y20S.patch > > > The HDFS web user interface serves useful information through dfshealth.jsp and dfsnodelist.jsp. > The Herriot interface to Hadoop cluster daemons would benefit from the addition of some way to channel metics information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-1-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 02:58:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44833 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 02:58:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 02:58:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 46153 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 02:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46129 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 02:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91845 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 00:43:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <1252650899.1246408967176.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:42:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725867#action_12725867 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6122: ------------------------------------------------ > ... For an empty patch, why it says 64 javac warnings but not 124? Look like that this is another problem in common but not in hdfs and mapreduce. > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-2-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 04:19:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61359 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 04:19:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 04:19:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 86058 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 04:19:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85989 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 04:19:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85979 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 04:19:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:19:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:19:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D910234C004 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1017868693.1246421927302.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:18:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "rahul k singh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] rahul k singh updated HADOOP-5170: ---------------------------------- Attachment: tasklimits-v4-20.patch patch for yahoo internal repo > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-3-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 05:29:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75706 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 05:29:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 05:29:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 15477 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:29:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15446 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:29:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15436 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 05:29:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:29:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:29:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976E234C004 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1115140547.1246426127286.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:28:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725929#action_12725929 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6123: ---------------------------------------- The scripts won't run as it is for common and hdfs as the ivy lib path has changed. Classpath in hadoop-config.sh needs to include new paths. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-4-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 05:31:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77166 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 16598 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16576 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16566 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 05:31:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:31:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2A9234C004 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1269670427.1246426248830.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:30:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6123_v1.patch This patch updates the classpath after the project split. Apply this patch and copy the bin folder in hdfs project. All scripts should work as it is. This eventually has to be fixed in build file of mapred and hdfs which can extract the bin folder out of the common jar. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-5-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 09:47:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59638 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 09:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 46447 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46423 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46413 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDDF234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1548246809.1246441607576.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6090) GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated HADOOP-6090: -------------------------------------------- Attachment: 6090.txt Patch modifying data generation script to use output format from new api. > GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: benchmarks > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6090.txt > > > GridMix data generation scripts need to use the newer mapreduce api. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-6-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 09:47:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59701 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 09:47:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 46502 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46474 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46463 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 09:47:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D94234C046 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1146116981.1246441607617.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6090) GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu updated HADOOP-6090: -------------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Tested the patch manually by running generateGridmix2data.sh > GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: benchmarks > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6090.txt > > > GridMix data generation scripts need to use the newer mapreduce api. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 11:10:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85582 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 11:10:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 11:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 22274 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22252 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22242 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D3B234C1EE for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2140358728.1246446647985.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-2366) Space in the value for dfs.data.dir can cause great problems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726013#action_12726013 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-2366: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #13 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/13/]) . Support trimmed strings in Configuration. Contributed by Michele Catasta > Space in the value for dfs.data.dir can cause great problems > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-2366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2366 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Reporter: Ted Dunning > Assignee: Michele (aka pirroh) Catasta > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-2366.patch > > > The following configuration causes problems: > > dfs.data.dir > /mnt/hstore2/hdfs, /home/foo/dfs > > Determines where on the local filesystem an DFS data node should store its bl > ocks. If this is a comma-delimited list of directories, then data will be stor > ed in all named directories, typically on different devices. Directories that > do not exist are ignored. > > > The problem is that the space after the comma causes the second directory for storage to be " /home/foo/dfs" which is in a directory named which contains a sub-dir named "home" in the hadoop datanodes default directory. This will typically cause the user's home partition to fill, but will be very hard for the user to understand since a directory with a whitespace name is hard to understand. > My proposed solution would be to trimLeft all path names from this and similar property after splitting on comma. This still allows spaces in file and directory names but avoids this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-8-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 11:11:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85678 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 11:11:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 22401 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22374 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22364 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E022A234C04B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <438678916.1246446647917.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6080) Handling of Trash with quota MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726011#action_12726011 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6080: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #13 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/13/]) is going to 0.20. . Introduce -skipTrash option to rm and rmr. Contributed by Jakob Homan. > Handling of Trash with quota > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6080 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6080 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Koji Noguchi > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.20.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6080-v20.patch, HADOOP-6080.patch, javac_warnings_diff.txt > > > Currently with quota turned on, user cannot call '-rmr' on large directory that causes over quota. > {noformat} > [knoguchi src]$ hadoop dfs -rmr /tmp/net2 > rmr: Failed to move to trash: hdfs://abc.def.com/tmp/net2 > [knoguchi src]$ hadoop dfs -mv /tmp/net2 /user/knoguchi/.Trash/Current > mv: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.QuotaExceededException: The quota of /user/knoguchi is exceeded: namespace > quota=37500 file count=37757, diskspace quota=-1 diskspace=1991250043353 > {noformat} > Besides from error message being unfriendly, how should this be handled? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-9-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 11:11:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85726 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 11:11:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22446 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22423 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22413 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 11:11:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:11:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF5F234C1EA for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2083099887.1246446647961.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 04:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726012#action_12726012 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6122: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #13 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/13/]) . The great than operator in test-patch.sh should be "-gt" but not ">". > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-10-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 12:49:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11844 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 12:49:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 38904 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38879 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38869 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:49:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:49:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D41234C04B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <688823703.1246452527539.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6106) Provide an option in ShellCommandExecutor to timeout commands that do not complete within a certain amount of time. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726039#action_12726039 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #9 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/9/]) . Updated hadoop-core and test jars from hudson trunk #12 > Provide an option in ShellCommandExecutor to timeout commands that do not complete within a certain amount of time. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6106-1.patch, HADOOP-6106-2.patch, HADOOP-6106.patch, mapred-211-common-3.patch > > > In MAPREDUCE-211 we came across a need to provide an option to timeout commands launched via the ShellCommandExecutor. The use case is for the health check script being developed in MAPREDUCE-211. We would like the TaskTracker thread to not be blocked by a problematic script or in instances where fork()+exec() has hung (which apparently has been observed in large clusters). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-11-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 12:49:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11884 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 12:49:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 38962 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38938 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38928 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 12:49:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:49:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:49:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E874234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2071225828.1246452527316.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726038#action_12726038 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6122: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #9 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/9/]) . The great than operator in test-patch.sh should be "-gt" but not ">". > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-12-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 13:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43417 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 13:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 13:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 45255 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 13:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45188 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 13:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45167 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 13:56:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:56:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:56:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679B9234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1169957006.1246456547410.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726067#action_12726067 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6121: ---------------------------------------- The JobTracker can persist its state, but for HA you'd need to do failover in the clients- currently to achieve that you need to switch the replacement to the same hostname/IP address of the original. The issue of HA for HDFS is raised in HDFS-243 > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-13-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 17:21:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39502 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 17:21:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 17:21:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 15004 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14978 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14918 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 17:22:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:22:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:22:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A61D234C045 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <330149198.1246468907238.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:21:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6114) bug in documentation: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6114: ------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks Dmitry. > bug in documentation: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6114 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.18.3, 0.20.0 > Reporter: Dmitry Rzhevskiy > Assignee: Dmitry Rzhevskiy > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6114.patch > > > In javadoc method org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() writtend that this method "return the length of this file, in blocks" > But method return size in bytes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-14-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 17:52:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61041 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 17:52:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 17:52:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 56432 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:52:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56404 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 17:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56390 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 17:52:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:52:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:52:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CD3234C04B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1756911292.1246470707358.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726151#action_12726151 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I'm sorry I'm coming in late on this. Are these new knobs at the job level? I think this the wrong direction. In particular, just limiting the number of slots won't do any good. The high ram job processing is a much better model. So rather than declaring max number of maps or reduces, we should allow "large task" jobs where each task is given multiple slots.I think we should revert this before it is released. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-15-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 18:05:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69748 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 18:05:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 18:05:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 73336 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73308 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73298 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 18:06:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:06:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A51A234C04B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <223402576.1246471547303.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:05:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726160#action_12726160 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6121: ------------------------------------- If you really want to go very robust with the JobTracker, you could implement it by embedding ZooKeeper and using it for all the RPC coordination and state tracking. This is a more natural fit than ZK for the NN, IMO. A job could be a node in ZK, TaskTrackers would be able to see what work they should do by looking in specific nodes -- and they can register their status and health as well. Something like a Reduce job getting the map outputs it needs would simply be listing children from a reduce node for a job. Fault tolerance would come for free, and this form of RPC would likely be more efficient than the current one. Furthermore, with watches firing off, there would be no ping-response sleep delays which would improve performance, and significantly improve latency for latency sensitive jobs. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-16-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 18:20:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87032 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 18:20:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 18:20:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 90917 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90888 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90878 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 18:20:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:20:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:20:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CB7234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1916530659.1246472387203.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6124: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c6124_20090701.patch > ... HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. I was wrong. HDFS and MapReduce also have this problem. The project is not cleaned when patchJavacWarnings.txt is generated. Some java source files may be already compiled and they will not be compiled again. As a result, the warnings inside those files won't be reported. Note that there is a clean when trunkJavacWarnings.txt is generated. c6124_20090701.patch: add clean before tar > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-17-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 18:52:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1589 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 18:52:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 18:52:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 38463 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:52:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38433 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 18:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38393 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 18:52:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:52:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:52:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3C234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2146752588.1246474307473.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726179#action_12726179 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- bq. I'm sorry I'm coming in late on this. Ditto. bq. Are these new knobs at the job level? I think this the wrong direction. In particular, just limiting the number of slots won't do any good. The high ram job processing is a much better model. So rather than declaring max number of maps or reduces, we should allow "large task" jobs where each task is given multiple slots. Couldn't agree more. See MAPREDUCE-516. I see the following issues: mapred.max.{maps|reduces}.per.node As of today, the framework will not be able to guard against users who take up a node and consume all resources (cpu, memory, disk etc.) and starve other user tasks running on the machines. This goes against the spirit of shared compute/storage clusters. I can see an argument being made for this feature once we can figure how to *charge* the user based on the task's total resource consumption; however we are a long way away from this. We have taken a step along this direction by introducing the High RAM Jobs feature in the Capacity Scheduler, we have a long way to go. mapred.max.{maps|reduces}.per.cluster Given that we mostly agree that the high-ram jobs are the right model, these features interact very badly with each other. Consider a high-ram job which has mapred.max.maps.per.cluster set to 100 and a few thousand tasks (a fraction of which is sufficient to exhaust the capacity of it's queue). Currently the CapacityScheduler starts 'reserving' slots (after charging the user, queue etc.) to satisfy the resource requirements of the job. Now we have 2 choices if we choose to incorporate mapred.max.{map|reduces}.per.cluster: # Do not 'reserve' more tasktrackers than mapred.max.maps.per.cluster # Reserve as much as needed but start 'unreserving' as soon as we have scheduled 'mapred.max.maps.per.cluster' number of maps. Either way we are in trouble. # The high-ram job is seriously starved. The scheduler has to pick only 100 nodes and no more. If they happened to be bad bets (other long running tasks etc.) the high-ram job needs to wait for a long while. Furthermore, the other bad side-effect is that the high-ram job gets *pinned* to the first 100 nodes and this really hurts locality of its tasks. # The cluster is severely under-utilized since we may reserve all of the queue's capacity and then realize that we have to start 'unreserving'. Once the first wave of maps of the high-ram job are done we rinse and repeat for each wave of mapred.max.maps.per.cluster maps, there-by keeping the cluster idle for large amounts of time. bq. I think we should revert this before it is released. Unfortunately, yes. +1 > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-18-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 20:18:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39418 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 20:18:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 20:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 93439 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:18:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93412 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:18:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93402 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 20:18:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:18:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:18:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE62234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <999068112.1246479467247.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:17:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5640) Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-5640: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5640.txt > Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-5640.txt, hadoop-5640.txt, HADOOP-5640.v2.txt, hadoop-5640.v3.txt > > > HADOOP-5257 added the ability for NameNode and DataNode to start and stop ServicePlugin implementations at NN/DN start/stop. However, this is insufficient integration for some common use cases. > We should add some functionality for Plugins to subscribe to events generated by the service they're plugging into. Some potential hook points are: > NameNode: > - new datanode registered > - datanode has died > - exception caught > - etc? > DataNode: > - startup > - initial registration with NN complete (this is important for HADOOP-4707 to sync up datanode.dnRegistration.name with the NN-side registration) > - namenode reconnect > - some block transfer hooks? > - exception caught > I see two potential routes for implementation: > 1) We make an enum for the types of hookpoints and have a general function in the ServicePlugin interface. Something like: > {code:java} > enum HookPoint { > DN_STARTUP, > DN_RECEIVED_NEW_BLOCK, > DN_CAUGHT_EXCEPTION, > ... > } > void runHook(HookPoint hp, Object value); > {code} > 2) We make classes specific to each "pluggable" as was originally suggested in HADDOP-5257. Something like: > {code:java} > class DataNodePlugin { > void datanodeStarted() {} > void receivedNewBlock(block info, etc) {} > void caughtException(Exception e) {} > ... > } > {code} > I personally prefer option (2) since we can ensure plugin API compatibility at compile-time, and we avoid an ugly switch statement in a runHook() function. > Interested to hear what people's thoughts are here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-19-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 20:24:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41055 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 20:24:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 20:24:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3650 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3633 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 20:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3623 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 20:24:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:24:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:24:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38889234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1652736510.1246479827217.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:23:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5640) Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726212#action_12726212 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-5640: ------------------------------------- bq. The plugin design is actually the listener pattern. For API extensibility it might be worth considering a ServiceEvent class that is passed to the methods of ServicePlugin and subclasses so that extra context information can be passed without breaking plugins. Also, ServicePlugin should be an abstract class. The ServicePlugin interface is a holdover from a previous JIRA HADOOP-5257, so I didn't want to modify that. Hopefully Carlos can chime in with regard to this, since he wrote that original patch. Can you explain more about the ServiceEvent idea? I think this is similar to one of the ideas discussed above, but I think it's cleaner to use actual methods with full signatures rather than exposing a single "handleEvent(ServiceEvent e)" and switching on "e instanceof FooEvent" vs "e instanceof BarEvent". bq. Rename PluginDispatcher to ServicePluginDispatcher. There are other plugins (e.g. MemoryCalculatorPlugin) so it's worth being more precise. Fixed in attached patch. bq. SingleArgumentRunnable might be named ServicePluginCallback to better indicate its use. I disagree - this is a very generic interface that is quite usable for a lot of different things. Since this code is going in util, we might as well make it available for other use cases as well rather than proliferating several interfaces that have the same use. The new patch I just attached is for the Common portion. I'll make a new JIRA in HDFS for the NameNodePlugin and DataNodePlugin portions of the patch. > Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-5640.txt, hadoop-5640.txt, HADOOP-5640.v2.txt, hadoop-5640.v3.txt > > > HADOOP-5257 added the ability for NameNode and DataNode to start and stop ServicePlugin implementations at NN/DN start/stop. However, this is insufficient integration for some common use cases. > We should add some functionality for Plugins to subscribe to events generated by the service they're plugging into. Some potential hook points are: > NameNode: > - new datanode registered > - datanode has died > - exception caught > - etc? > DataNode: > - startup > - initial registration with NN complete (this is important for HADOOP-4707 to sync up datanode.dnRegistration.name with the NN-side registration) > - namenode reconnect > - some block transfer hooks? > - exception caught > I see two potential routes for implementation: > 1) We make an enum for the types of hookpoints and have a general function in the ServicePlugin interface. Something like: > {code:java} > enum HookPoint { > DN_STARTUP, > DN_RECEIVED_NEW_BLOCK, > DN_CAUGHT_EXCEPTION, > ... > } > void runHook(HookPoint hp, Object value); > {code} > 2) We make classes specific to each "pluggable" as was originally suggested in HADDOP-5257. Something like: > {code:java} > class DataNodePlugin { > void datanodeStarted() {} > void receivedNewBlock(block info, etc) {} > void caughtException(Exception e) {} > ... > } > {code} > I personally prefer option (2) since we can ensure plugin API compatibility at compile-time, and we avoid an ugly switch statement in a runHook() function. > Interested to hear what people's thoughts are here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-20-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 21:04:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59020 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 21:04:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 81640 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81619 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94251 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 00:47:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:46:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6124 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-21-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 21:04:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59618 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 21:04:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 83019 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83000 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5509 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 00:57:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <1342457673.1246409807273.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:56:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725872#action_12725872 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6122: ------------------------------------------------ Filed HADOOP-6124 for the inconsistency problem. Tried test-patch.sh with the patch. It worked fine. > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-22-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 21:05:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59716 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 21:05:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 21:05:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 83176 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83150 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17704 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 01:27:11 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <1031327.1246411607264.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:26:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-6122. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I have committed this. > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-23-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 21:52:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91695 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 21:52:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 21:52:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 31138 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31094 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31083 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 21:38:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:38:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:38:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B86234C053 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <682341596.1246484267288.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6125) extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6125 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Philip Zeyliger Assignee: Philip Zeyliger Priority: Minor This is the co-ticket to MAPREDUCE-476, covering the significant part of DistributedCache that's in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-24-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 21:52:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92238 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 21:52:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 21:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31858 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31828 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 21:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31818 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 21:42:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:42:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:42:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97021234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1231587512.1246484507603.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:41:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6125) extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) In-Reply-To: <682341596.1246484267288.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-6125: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6125.patch Regenerated patches from HADOOP-2914. I used: bq. cat HADOOP-2914-v3.patch | sed -e 's,src/core/,src/java/,' | patch -p0 > extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6125 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6125.patch > > > This is the co-ticket to MAPREDUCE-476, covering the significant part of DistributedCache that's in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-25-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 01 22:23:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11999 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 22:23:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 22:23:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 98159 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 22:23:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98130 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 22:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98120 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 22:23:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:23:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:23:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED66234C04B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <884777006.1246486967977.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6125) extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) In-Reply-To: <682341596.1246484267288.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-6125: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6125 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6125.patch > > > This is the co-ticket to MAPREDUCE-476, covering the significant part of DistributedCache that's in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-26-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 02:10:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3321 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 02:10:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 02:10:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 51501 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 02:11:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51471 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 02:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51461 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 02:11:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:11:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:11:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B00234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <599207977.1246500647448.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3315) New binary file format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-3315: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-3315-0701-yhadoop-20.patch Patch attached for yahoo 0.20 branch. > New binary file format > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3315 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-3315-0507.patch, hadoop-3315-0509-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0509.patch, hadoop-3315-0513.patch, hadoop-3315-0514.patch, hadoop-3315-0601.patch, hadoop-3315-0602.patch, hadoop-3315-0605.patch, hadoop-3315-0612.patch, hadoop-3315-0623-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0701-yhadoop-20.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080908_TFILE_PREVIEW_WITH_LZO_TESTS.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080915_TFILE.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, TFile Specification 20081217.pdf > > > SequenceFile's block compression format is too complex and requires 4 codecs to compress or decompress. It would be good to have a file format that only needs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-27-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 03:37:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32491 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 03:37:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 03:37:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 5311 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 03:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5284 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 03:37:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5274 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 03:37:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:37:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:37:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DDA234C046 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <572617315.1246505807694.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:36:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley reassigned HADOOP-6124: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-28-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 06:05:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95885 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 06:05:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 06:05:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 34014 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33878 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 06:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33868 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 06:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:05:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA62234C004 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1570482149.1246514687619.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:04:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jie Qiu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726339#action_12726339 ] Jie Qiu commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------- Good suggestion on ZK with Jobtracker. Do you know who is implementing ZK for the NameNode? How doese it works? Currently, we employed the database-like replication approach to ship log from primary to standby(multiple standbys). We also plan to support different level synchnization, i.e. tight, loose. For tight mode, we guarantee primary disk write and standby disk write. For loose mode, we guarantee primary disk write and standby receive log. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-29-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 07:38:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34647 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 07:38:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 07:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 47729 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47701 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47612 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:39:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:39:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD5234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1497450433.1246520327283.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Carlos Valiente (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5640) Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726366#action_12726366 ] Carlos Valiente commented on HADOOP-5640: ----------------------------------------- {quote} bq. The plugin design is actually the listener pattern. For API extensibility it might be worth considering a ServiceEvent class that is passed to the methods of ServicePlugin and subclasses so that extra context information can be passed without breaking plugins. The ServicePlugin interface is a holdover from a previous JIRA HADOOP-5257, so I didn't want to modify that. Hopefully Carlos can chime in with regard to this, since he wrote that original patch. {quote} Sounds good to me. We could even go further and have just one single method in {{ServicePlugin}}: {code} public abstract class ServicePlugin { public abstract void onEvent(ServiceEvent event); } {code} ,instead of the current: {code} public interface ServicePlugin extends Closeable { void start(Object service); void stop(); } {code} I guess the {{ServiceEvent}} field would have a reference to the {{Object service}} parameter, among other things. > Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-5640.txt, hadoop-5640.txt, HADOOP-5640.v2.txt, hadoop-5640.v3.txt > > > HADOOP-5257 added the ability for NameNode and DataNode to start and stop ServicePlugin implementations at NN/DN start/stop. However, this is insufficient integration for some common use cases. > We should add some functionality for Plugins to subscribe to events generated by the service they're plugging into. Some potential hook points are: > NameNode: > - new datanode registered > - datanode has died > - exception caught > - etc? > DataNode: > - startup > - initial registration with NN complete (this is important for HADOOP-4707 to sync up datanode.dnRegistration.name with the NN-side registration) > - namenode reconnect > - some block transfer hooks? > - exception caught > I see two potential routes for implementation: > 1) We make an enum for the types of hookpoints and have a general function in the ServicePlugin interface. Something like: > {code:java} > enum HookPoint { > DN_STARTUP, > DN_RECEIVED_NEW_BLOCK, > DN_CAUGHT_EXCEPTION, > ... > } > void runHook(HookPoint hp, Object value); > {code} > 2) We make classes specific to each "pluggable" as was originally suggested in HADDOP-5257. Something like: > {code:java} > class DataNodePlugin { > void datanodeStarted() {} > void receivedNewBlock(block info, etc) {} > void caughtException(Exception e) {} > ... > } > {code} > I personally prefer option (2) since we can ensure plugin API compatibility at compile-time, and we avoid an ugly switch statement in a runHook() function. > Interested to hear what people's thoughts are here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-30-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 07:45:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36671 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 07:45:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 07:45:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 53889 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53859 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 07:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53849 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 07:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:45:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36539234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <338098663.1246520687208.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:44:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jie Qiu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726370#action_12726370 ] Jie Qiu commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------- Currently, in my experiment, my approach follows: 1. Hook Hadoop for Memory write and Disk write. Memory write means changes to the BTree, the corresponding log operations (OP_ADD, OP_RENAME, OP_DELETE,....) Disk write means write the log to disks 2. Replication log from primary node to slaves(one standy at this stage) 3. Replay log in slaves 4. Standby heartbeat primary and take over if it feels primary down I would like to know other approaches for Hadoop HA on NameNode. What's additional requirements on Hadoop HA? > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-31-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 11:52:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35887 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 11:52:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 11:52:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 43143 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 11:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43113 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 11:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43103 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 11:52:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:52:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:52:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F27234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <594915485.1246535507448.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6114) bug in documentation: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726442#action_12726442 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6114: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #14 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/14/]) . Fix javadoc documentation for FileStatus.getLen. (Dmitry Rzhevskiy via dhruba) > bug in documentation: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6114 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.18.3, 0.20.0 > Reporter: Dmitry Rzhevskiy > Assignee: Dmitry Rzhevskiy > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6114.patch > > > In javadoc method org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileStatus.getLen() writtend that this method "return the length of this file, in blocks" > But method return size in bytes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-32-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:09:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9895 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:09:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:09:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 76935 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76889 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76872 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:10:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:10:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA42234C045 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6773949.1246554587317.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:09:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726560#action_12726560 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6121: ---------------------------------------- whatever you come up with, can it work on virtualised clusters where clocks are jittery? I encounter lots of interesting timeouts with VMs, depending on the underlying infrastructure and its load, and its easy for anything that assumes that multicast works or that clocks move forward at the same rate to get confused. At this point Lamport will probably post a comment implying that timeouts are essential, and I agree -things just need to work well in a world where time is jerky, and the virtual HDDs may not be flushed when calling sync(). > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-33-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:38:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33853 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:38:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:38:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 18493 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18461 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18446 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:38:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:38:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B16234C046 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <423916970.1246556267337.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726573#action_12726573 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6121: ------------------------------------- {quote}Do you know who is implementing ZK for the NameNode?{quote} I don't even know if such a thing is happening, but given that Google's MapReduce paper and BigTable paper indicate that Chubby is leveraged for HA on various hadoop equivalents I figured that was part of the discussion. I am in the process of using ZK for an internal project that has some similarities with the JT. Previously it was using ping-response for both state communication and triggering (distributed) events. Switching to ZK proved to be a bit outside the bounds of its typical use case but is very fast, reliable, and light-weight. State management and persistence is much easier, and communication with watches very reliable and fast. Anyhow, its an option. The reliability, availability, and time sensitivity issues it addresses. Other special aspects of the JT use case would probably drive some ZK features -- like an api to return only 'new' children of a node after a specific transaction id, easier out-of-the-box embedding, and some higher level APIs for read-only/watch-only use cases. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-34-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 17:51:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43139 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 17:51:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 17:51:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36577 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:52:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36475 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 17:52:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36417 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 17:52:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:52:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:52:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB5B234C052 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <806380709.1246557107321.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726578#action_12726578 ] Mahadev konar commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------------- bq. whatever you come up with, can it work on virtualised clusters where clocks are jittery? I encounter lots of interesting timeouts with VMs, depending on the underlying infrastructure and its load, and its easy for anything that assumes that multicast works or that clocks move forward at the same rate to get confused. At this point Lamport will probably post a comment implying that timeouts are essential, and I agree -things just need to work well in a world where time is jerky, and the virtual HDDs may not be flushed when calling sync(). steve, We have seen ZooKeeper being used on EC2 in virtualized environment. As far I can say, it works for those folks. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-35-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 18:29:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74973 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 18:29:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 18:29:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 23153 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23102 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23092 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:30:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:30:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FD8234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1104778121.1246559387271.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726602#action_12726602 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I wrote this patch because of demand for this feature from many users, including Cloudera customers, who had reasons to limit the number of tasks per job. If the patch interacts poorly with the capacity scheduler, wouldn't it make more sense to tell users of the capacity scheduler not to use this feature, or to improve MAPREDUCE-516 so that it can take into account task limits? I agree that task limits are not the best solution for dealing with high-memory jobs, but that's not the only situation that this patch addresses. Here are some others: * The situation described in the original task was that a task is very CPU-intensive. The user wanted to limit the number of those tasks running to less than the number of cores. However, there is no need to fill up all slots on the machine - the other slots could be used for less CPU-intensive tasks. Until there is a model for all system resources in the capacity scheduler, this patch lets users with that kind of problem achieve reasonable behavior. * One situation in which you want to limit tasks on the whole cluster is if you have a housekeeping job with long tasks, e.g. a database import or export. If you don't have a limit on running tasks, such a job can take up the whole cluster and hold it for a long time. The capacity and fair schedulers include a preemption feature to kill tasks, but preemption has some problems: First, the preemption timeout generally shouldn't be set to less than 5-10 minutes so it doesn't interact badly with faulty tasktracker timeouts, and second, preemption might complicate writing certain jobs (e.g. database import/export). I also think the problems Arun brought up in the capacity scheduler aren't insurmountable. To deal with the locality problem, you can give up slots when you run out of local data on them, like MAPREDUCE-548. To deal with the pinning problem, preemption might help. More importantly, I think Arun's issues will come up even if task limits aren't used. For example, suppose that a given queue's capacity is 25% of the cluster, say 250 slots, and that all the other queues are filled with jobs, so there is never excess capacity. Then if a high-memory job is submitted to the queue with 25% capacity, it has to behave exactly as if it has a limit of 250 tasks cluster-wide. The same problems that Arun brought up will happen: locality will be poor, the job might make bad bets, etc. This situation will be far more common than a user explicitly setting a limit on running tasks for the job, so if these two concerns are serious, maybe more work needs to be put into MAPREDUCE-516 to prevent them from happening. In particular, I think limiting the number of "bets" based on the job's capacity or task limit, allowing the job to kill tasks if it has waited for too long on a bet, and implementing MAPREDUCE-548 would solve much of the problem. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-36-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 18:50:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85268 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 18:49:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 18:49:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 62942 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 18:50:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62909 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 18:50:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62899 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 18:50:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:50:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:50:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F17C234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1338667609.1246560587244.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726622#action_12726622 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I am using this patch on 0.19 and 0.20, and will have to continue patching it if taken out of the 0.21 release. I've also recommended this patch and know of others who are using it... It solves a number of scheduling issues we have. The idea of having "heavy" tasks works great for high-memory jobs. But we have a number of network-io bound jobs and cpu bound jobs. We can make the network bound jobs light, and cpu bound jobs heavy, but what we really want is to have one cpu bound job run per node (we have one core for it), and lots of network jobs per node... simultaneously. With task weights, how can I prevent the cpu bound job from taking up all the slots and letting in high numbers of network bound jobs at the same time? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-37-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 19:02:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91340 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 19:02:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 19:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 84247 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 19:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84213 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 19:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84193 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 19:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:02:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14392234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1138049620.1246561308068.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:01:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726633#action_12726633 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- bq. If the patch interacts poorly with the capacity scheduler, wouldn't it make more sense to tell users of the capacity scheduler not to use this feature, or to improve MAPREDUCE-516 so that it can take into account task limits? Like I said, this patch introduced 2 features: per-node limits and per-job limits. The per-job cluster limit interacts poorly with the MAPREDUCE-516, not per-node limits. bq. The situation described in the original task was that a task is very CPU-intensive. The user wanted to limit the number of those tasks running to less than the number of cores. However, there is no need to fill up all slots on the machine - the other slots could be used for less CPU-intensive tasks. Until there is a model for all system resources in the capacity scheduler, this patch lets users with that kind of problem achieve reasonable behavior. We are missing the woods for the trees here. The user whose task is CPU-intensive is happy. But, what about the other users whose tasks need CPU too? How do we keep their tasks from starving on the same node? In particular there are no checks and balances on preventing multiple CPU-intensive tasks from being scheduled on the same node. If we *knew* that the other tasks were going to be IO intensive we could co-schedule them on this node, but we don't. This is the reason why Owen and I continue to insist that per-node task limits are a poor substitute for modelling resource usage and that a resource model is a *pre-requisite* for this feature. This feature works well for clusters with single users, but not in shared clusters. bq. One situation in which you want to limit tasks on the whole cluster is if you have a housekeeping job with long tasks, e.g. a database import or export. If you don't have a limit on running tasks, such a job can take up the whole cluster and hold it for a long time. The short-term fix is to submit these jobs to a special queue with limited capacity, possibly to queues with a hard upper-limit on their capacity: MAPREDUCE-532. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-38-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 19:26:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2700 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 19:26:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 19:26:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 30454 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 19:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30421 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 19:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30406 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 19:26:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:26:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329F0234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1334497635.1246562747202.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:25:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726645#action_12726645 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- If the capacity scheduler will need to support cluster-wide task limits through MAPREDUCE-532 eventually, why can't it support them through this per-job property? I fully agree that per-node limits aren't a solution to resource sharing in a multi-user environment. However, most Hadoop clusters outside Yahoo, Facebook and a few other large installations are essentially single-user. For these clusters, the per-node limit solves real problems until the time when we introduce a resource model to Hadoop (which will be a serious undertaking). This is why there were many votes on this feature. Whenever I've talked to people about the fair scheduler, task limits have been one of the most requested features. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-39-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 20:30:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27048 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 20:30:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 20:30:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 27582 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27540 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:30:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27488 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 20:30:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:30:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:30:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C75234C052 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <81915344.1246566587399.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726664#action_12726664 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-5170: ----------------------------------- This is an optional feature - users don't have to use it and it is turned off by default. It has no performance impact for those who don't enable it. On the other hand there are a substantial number of users who are using it (or interested in using it), and would be left with no immediate alternative if it were pulled from the next release. We can leave this feature in until there is a suitable replacement, after which time it can be deprecated so users can migrate to the replacement. Could that work? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-40-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 20:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38149 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 20:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 20:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 71147 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71112 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70955 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:56:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:56:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEC2234C055 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <415486475.1246568147306.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726674#action_12726674 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- The problem with this patch is that it doesn't do anything useful and gets in the way of real fixes to the problem. Limiting the number of running tasks per a job is *not* what any users need. It is being used as an expedient way to hack in global resource limits. If I launch two cpu hungry jobs (even with a single user!), I will kill those nodes. That is *not* ok. While MAPREDUCE-516 addresses high-ram jobs, it takes the view that each slot has a set of resources and that a given job's tasks may require multiple slots. This *is* a reasonable model that is applicable for cpu, ram, or disk. It would be reasonable to change the interface to MAPREDUCE-516 to be in terms of the slots per a task instead of memory. Clearly in the long term, I think that a more dynamic model that tracks the resources being consumed and launches new tasks appropriately. In the mean time, MAPREDUCE-516 is a much better approach to this. {quote} This is an optional feature - users don't have to use it and it is turned off by default. It has no performance impact for those who don't enable it. On the other hand there are a substantial number of users who are using it (or interested in using it), and would be left with no immediate alternative if it were pulled from the next release. We can leave this feature in until there is a suitable replacement, after which time it can be deprecated so users can migrate to the replacement. Could that work? {quote} -1 Because once it is in, we need to support it. When it doesn't work for the users, they'll try and fix it. We already have users confused by too many knobs... > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-41-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 20:56:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38266 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 20:56:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 71650 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71617 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71607 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 20:56:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:56:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:56:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450C7234C046 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <249233974.1246568147281.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726673#action_12726673 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6124: ------------------------------------------------ Giridharan, c6124_20090701.patch does not fix the entire problem. There are still some additional bugs in test-patch.sh. Since you are the assignee, I will leave this issue to you. Thanks for working on this. > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-42-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 20:58:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38597 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 20:58:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 20:58:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 76201 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76166 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 20:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76155 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 20:58:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:58:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:58:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F41234C044 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1456491324.1246568267297.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reopened HADOOP-5170: ----------------------------------- This is *not* resolved and will likely be reverted. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-43-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 21:12:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42830 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 21:12:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 21:12:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 88070 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88038 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88028 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 21:12:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:12:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:12:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E79234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1072426585.1246569107209.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:11:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726683#action_12726683 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- bq. If the capacity scheduler will need to support cluster-wide task limits through MAPREDUCE-532 eventually, why can't it support them through this per-job property? Sorry, I should have clarified that we are simplifying the scope of MAPREDUCE-532 to implement a 'hard-limit' on a queue. Thus, we can limit the fan-in to the resource in question via the hard-limit on the special queue for the resource. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-44-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 21:43:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65473 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 21:43:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 21:43:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18056 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18024 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18014 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 21:44:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:44:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:44:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D06234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2073335369.1246571027206.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726694#action_12726694 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-5170: ----------------------------------- Thanks for the clarification Arun. Are you targeting MAPREDUCE-532 for 0.21? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-45-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 21:48:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66977 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 21:48:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 21:48:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19540 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19504 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19451 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 21:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:48:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764D234C045 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1779429919.1246571267291.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:47:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726696#action_12726696 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- Yes, it should be ready in a day or two. We will release a patch for the yahoo 0.20 branch too. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-46-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 21:58:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72545 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 21:58:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 21:58:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 30662 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30627 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 21:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30617 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 21:58:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:58:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:58:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFCC234C045 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <812364339.1246571867654.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726703#action_12726703 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-5170: ------------------------------------------ @Arun: is the yahoo 0.20 branch (that you refer to) an existing branch in apache svn? how soon can I access it :-) ? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-47-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 22:04:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75980 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 22:04:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 22:04:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 37452 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:04:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37417 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37392 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 22:04:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:04:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:04:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4558C234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2026526339.1246572227268.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726706#action_12726706 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- @Dhruba: http://developer.yahoo.com/hadoop/distribution/ > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-48-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 22:18:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83975 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 22:18:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 22:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 54457 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:18:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54423 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:18:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54412 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 22:18:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:18:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:18:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3895B234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1069477120.1246573067217.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726709#action_12726709 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- Arun, can you explain what the hard limit on capacity means? Is it option 2 in MAPREDUCE-532 that just disallows a queue from taking excess capacity? I'm still not sure how this can solve the problems you brought up. In fact, as I pointed out in my earlier comment, even *without* any limits defined, MAPREDUCE-516 can harm locality and utilization in its current form. Am I missing something about per-job limits that makes them different from queue limits or from no excess capacity being available? Owen, I agree that having MAPREDUCE-516 be in terms of multi-slot tasks would solve some issues, but it doesn't sound like it would solve Jonathan's problem for example. I think that coming up with a general multi-resource sharing model will be difficult. Is there anything we can do in the meantime to support this use case? For example, it would be trivial for me to implement the per-node limits in the fair scheduler, but then they wouldn't be available to users of other schedulers. This might also be a good time to figure out exactly what scheduling functionality can go into JobInProgress/TaskTracker/etc and what should go into schedulers. I didn't think the limits in this patch added much complexity. They obey the contract of obtainNewMapTask, which is that it may or may not return a task. Schedulers already have to deal with jobs that have no tasks to launch on one heartbeat, and then have tasks on the next, because of speculation. So any scheduler that works with that should more or less be okay if the job chooses to launch a task based on its total number of running tasks. If we agreed on some kind of contract, then we would be able to implement common scheduling functionality in the mapreduce package rather than having it be contrib. Otherwise, as long as there are multiple groups working on scheduling on Hadoop, everyone will be worried that someone else's change will break their future work. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-49-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 22:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94163 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 22:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 22:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 87839 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87801 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87789 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 22:56:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:56:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:56:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E85234C045 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <650091643.1246575347281.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726727#action_12726727 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- bq. Arun, can you explain what the hard limit on capacity means? Is it option 2 in MAPREDUCE-532 that just disallows a queue from taking excess capacity? Yes, it will *only* had a hard-limit per-queue. This feature is aimed at solving a certain class of problem alone i.e. limiting fan-in for a specific resource. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-50-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 22:58:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94488 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 22:58:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 22:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 91570 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91532 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 22:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91522 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 22:58:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:58:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:58:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B99234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <917570151.1246575467206.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726728#action_12726728 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- bq. Yes, it will only had a hard-limit per-queue. This feature is aimed at solving a certain class of problem alone i.e. limiting fan-in for a specific resource. s/had/add > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-51-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 23:46:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5079 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 23:46:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 23:46:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 28609 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:46:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28574 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28564 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 23:46:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:46:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67768234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1785951011.1246578347410.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:45:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726737#action_12726737 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I think those limits are a very bad idea. If you think they are useful, I'd be ok with putting them into the fair share scheduler. Then you can experiment with them and see if they are useful outside of a single user research cluster. I suspect you'll quickly discover the lack of utility in this patch. I certainly don't think this is appropriate to go into the main map/reduce framework. You're right that we can't support Jonathan's use case, but it isn't a valid use case for Hadoop. Hadoop is about *sharing* a cluster with other users. It is not a personal supercomputer operating system. (Although Arun and I did *have* a personal Hadoop supercomputer for a couple months while running the sort benchmarks. *smile*) I plan on reverting this and closing this as wont fix. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-52-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 23:55:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6637 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 23:55:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 23:55:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 31450 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31417 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31407 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 23:56:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:56:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:56:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E36234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1881140605.1246578947712.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726740#action_12726740 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I don't see how my use case is invalid. And if decisions are always made for the betterment of very large clusters with multiple users rather than smaller clusters with a single user (or at least, in a controlled environment), you're going to alienate a vast majority of new users and even seasoned users who happen to not care about multi-user environments. I don't particularly care _how_ I get done what I need to get done. But I have thousands of jobs submitted to my cluster every day and prior to this patch I was unable to get to 25% the capacity I have now because of the characteristics of a very small minority of the total number of jobs. I need a way to prevent CPU intensive jobs from eating all the cores. If I have 20 nodes and 100 CPU bound jobs, i only want 1 per node at a time. That strikes me as a common use case, not an invalid one. At the same time I'd like a way to allow 10 jobs per node of network bound jobs that do little else but wait around. >From a boots on the ground perspective, I can say that this jira comes up more than once a week in discussion with new users, etc. It's easy to understand and gives the user an enormous amount of control with very few knobs. At least stick this functionality into a corner somewhere so those of us who want it can still use it. When there is more mature scheduling down the road, I'm more than happy to switch. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-53-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 02 23:58:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6880 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2009 23:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 31909 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31876 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2009 23:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31777 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2009 23:58:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:58:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:58:09 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E3E234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <686624790.1246579067796.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris K Wensel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726741#action_12726741 ] Chris K Wensel commented on HADOOP-5170: ---------------------------------------- bq. Hadoop is about sharing a cluster with other users. I beg to differ. many of my users run many concurrent single purpose Hadoop clusters in AWS. each tuned and sized to the particular load. i believe, HOD exists for this purpose as well, to some extent. re this patch. many users, I expect the bulk of Hadoop users, have small constrained clusters and are happy with hand crafting their workloads to get the best utilization and performance. whether or not this patch is 'correct', reading above I get the impression it is being used and the users find it useful. flat out reverting it seems heavy handed without an alternative available. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-54-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 00:33:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25738 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 00:33:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 00:33:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 49546 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:34:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49512 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:34:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49502 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 00:34:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:34:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:34:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800E234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2105061098.1246581227216.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726751#action_12726751 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- {quote} I have thousands of jobs submitted to my cluster every day and prior to this patch I was unable to get to 25% the capacity I have now because of the characteristics of a very small minority of the total number of jobs. I need a way to prevent CPU intensive jobs from eating all the cores. If I have 20 nodes and 100 CPU bound jobs, i only want 1 per node at a time. That strikes me as a common use case, not an invalid one. At the same time I'd like a way to allow 10 jobs per node of network bound jobs that do little else but wait around. {quote} Jonathan, Can you please sketch the scenario you face in more detail? I'll hazard a *guess* and ask you to consider using high-ram jobs for your CPU intensive jobs and use MAPREDUCE-532 to limit how much of the cluster they occupy. (I'm reading that you have a small minority of such jobs from your comment). For e.g. create a 'cpu-heavy' queue and limit it's capacity as a fraction of your total capacity using MAPREDUCE-532. Then configure your CPU-intensive jobs to use up a majority of the slots in each node (thus preventing 2 slots of the same job from being scheduled on the same node) and submit these jobs to the 'cpu-heavy' queue. Yes, you will not be able to run too many other tasks on those nodes. But with MAPREDUCE-532 you can ensure that it doesn't affect too many nodes in your cluster. Will that work? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-55-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 00:40:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26357 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 00:40:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 00:40:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 50806 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:40:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50773 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50763 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 00:40:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:40:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:40:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3E9234C045 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <148561964.1246581587512.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:39:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726753#action_12726753 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- Jonathan, would you be okay if this feature was placed in the fair scheduler? I agree with Owen that it's a good idea to remove task limits from the Hadoop core interface so as not to lock in the API. However, I will support them in the fair scheduler. Apart from the demand for this feature from the community, we have paying customers at Cloudera who asked for this patch and run it on multi-rack clusters. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-56-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 00:54:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28377 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 00:54:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 00:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 61393 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:54:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61359 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 00:54:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61349 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 00:54:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:54:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:54:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34185234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <450020554.1246582427199.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:53:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726757#action_12726757 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- @Matei +1 @Arun I need to dig further into MAPREDUCE-532 before I can make an educated assessment. I'm not that familiar with scheduling and queues; part of the reason I like this issue is the simplicity. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-57-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 01:29:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40177 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 01:28:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 01:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 79405 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 01:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79372 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 01:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79362 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 01:29:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:29:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56248234C004 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <919096066.1246584527206.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:28:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amr Awadallah (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726762#action_12726762 ] Amr Awadallah commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------------- bq. Do you know who is implementing ZK for the NameNode? see bookkeeper: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-276 > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-58-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 02:17:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67524 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 02:17:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 02:17:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 8831 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 02:17:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 02:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8788 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 02:17:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:17:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:17:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DF829A0018 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <207056657.1246587407420.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:16:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726768#action_12726768 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-5170: ------------------------------------- bq. You're right that we can't support Jonathan's use case, but it isn't a valid use case for Hadoop. Hadoop is about sharing a cluster with other users. Please don't assume everyone uses Hadoop the same way. Many users are more than willing to tune a specific job flow on a cluster for max compute power per $ and have little or no ad-hoc job submission. For some such a workflow is business critical and the cost/benefit of heavy hand-tuning is obvious. Yes, these tuning knobs are not good for all use cases and especially ad-hoc shared cluster use. Being able to specifically tune a business critical workflow is a very good thing for some. There is a reason this JIRA gained a lot of watchers fast and has the most votes for it. A resource model will be very useful, but it will never beat hand tuning for performance -- it will only get part way there -- and the two can be cooperative as well. Some clusters will be used in ways such that hand tuning is possible, others won't. Perhaps in the long term there could be a shared scheduler component that contains all the task limits with a default implementation, and each scheduler can optionally use, or override it. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-59-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 08:27:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83599 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 08:27:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 08:27:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 75173 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:28:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75138 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75128 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 08:28:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:28:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:28:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA98234C044 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <353679909.1246609667251.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:27:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bo Dong (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726825#action_12726825 ] Bo Dong commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------- scott, We find that the JobTracker only persist the state of competed and dead jobs in DFS, not including the state of in-process jobs. However, we can use the existing approach by which JT persists the competed and dead jobs to persist the in-process jobs in JT. I feel it is much simpler than ZK-based approach, since we already make NN high availability. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-60-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 08:56:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90019 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 08:56:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 08:56:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 11375 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11345 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 08:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11307 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 08:56:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:56:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92C7234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <490182956.1246611347940.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:55:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bo Dong (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726835#action_12726835 ] Bo Dong commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------- To Amr: We found that Bookkeeper said Hadoop used Write-Ahead logging approach. However, based on my understanding, in 0.19, Hadoop modifies the contents in memory first, and then persists the log. And there is no transaction relationship between modifying memory and persisting log. For example, in the Create operation (Create a new file entry in the namespace) [FSNamesystem.java 998] startFileInternal(src, permissions, holder, clientMachine, overwrite, false, replication, blockSize); // Add a node child to the namespace, and write the log to a buffer. [FSNamesystem.java 1000] getEditLog().logSync(); // persist the log to the disk. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-61-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:20:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96135 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:20:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:20:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 42493 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42459 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42449 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:20:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:20:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954F1234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1139664967.1246612787604.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:19:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5640) Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726838#action_12726838 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-5640: ----------------------------------- {quote} Can you explain more about the ServiceEvent idea? I think this is similar to one of the ideas discussed above, but I think it's cleaner to use actual methods with full signatures rather than exposing a single "handleEvent(ServiceEvent e)" and switching on "e instanceof FooEvent" vs "e instanceof BarEvent". {quote} I agree, I was just suggesting having a ServiceEvent parameter to hang other contextual information off, to ease API evolution in the future. {quote} bq. SingleArgumentRunnable might be named ServicePluginCallback to better indicate its use. I disagree - this is a very generic interface that is quite usable for a lot of different things. Since this code is going in util, we might as well make it available for other use cases as well rather than proliferating several interfaces that have the same use. {quote} I would argue that code goes into common once it has been demonstrated that it is needed by more than one other subproject. This is true in this case since there will be HDFS and MapReduce plugins, so it makes sense for the service plugin stuff to live in util in common. Whether SingleArgumentRunnable is better called ServicePluginCallback or not depends on whether the interface gains further adoption outside service plugins. This is hard to predict so I'm +0 on calling it SingleArgumentRunnable. > Allow ServicePlugins to hook callbacks into key service events > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-5640.txt, hadoop-5640.txt, HADOOP-5640.v2.txt, hadoop-5640.v3.txt > > > HADOOP-5257 added the ability for NameNode and DataNode to start and stop ServicePlugin implementations at NN/DN start/stop. However, this is insufficient integration for some common use cases. > We should add some functionality for Plugins to subscribe to events generated by the service they're plugging into. Some potential hook points are: > NameNode: > - new datanode registered > - datanode has died > - exception caught > - etc? > DataNode: > - startup > - initial registration with NN complete (this is important for HADOOP-4707 to sync up datanode.dnRegistration.name with the NN-side registration) > - namenode reconnect > - some block transfer hooks? > - exception caught > I see two potential routes for implementation: > 1) We make an enum for the types of hookpoints and have a general function in the ServicePlugin interface. Something like: > {code:java} > enum HookPoint { > DN_STARTUP, > DN_RECEIVED_NEW_BLOCK, > DN_CAUGHT_EXCEPTION, > ... > } > void runHook(HookPoint hp, Object value); > {code} > 2) We make classes specific to each "pluggable" as was originally suggested in HADDOP-5257. Something like: > {code:java} > class DataNodePlugin { > void datanodeStarted() {} > void receivedNewBlock(block info, etc) {} > void caughtException(Exception e) {} > ... > } > {code} > I personally prefer option (2) since we can ensure plugin API compatibility at compile-time, and we avoid an ugly switch statement in a runHook() function. > Interested to hear what people's thoughts are here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-62-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:28:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 667 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:28:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:28:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 55501 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55464 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55454 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:28:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:28:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9B5234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2030116184.1246613267427.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:27:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726843#action_12726843 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6121: ------------------------------------------ bq. We find that the JobTracker only persist the state of competed and dead jobs in DFS, not including the state of in-process jobs. Umm. This is not true. JobTracker persists the state of running jobs as well in the job history files and can recover from this state upon a restart. This was done as part of HADOOP-3245. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-63-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 09:48:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14713 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 09:48:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 09:48:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 79466 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79430 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 09:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79420 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 09:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:48:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F951234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <141304229.1246614467180.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:47:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6125) extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) In-Reply-To: <682341596.1246484267288.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12726848#action_12726848 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6125: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412324/HADOOP-6125.patch against trunk revision 790831. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 3 new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 259 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 258 warnings). -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/554/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/554/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/554/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/554/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/554/console This message is automatically generated. > extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6125 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6125.patch > > > This is the co-ticket to MAPREDUCE-476, covering the significant part of DistributedCache that's in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-64-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 10:40:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44122 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 10:40:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 10:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 67101 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 10:40:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67080 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 10:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67026 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 10:40:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:40:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:40:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B31234C053 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1355474846.1246617587358.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:39:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt Adding patches for quick review. Still a work in progress. Incorporated most of Devaraj's comments. Two major changes from the previous patch: - Pulled _taskTracker/jobcache/attemp-id/work_ to _taskTracker/jobcache/task-work/attempt-id/work_. This is done to solve issues with jvm reuse. The work dir needs to be shared across tasks with jvm reuse and so cannot be finalized to be owned back by the TT on task finish. Pulling this out makes things clean, the original attempt-dir is finalized, and the task-work directory is cleaned up on jvm exit. TODO: task-work can have better name, perhaps jvmcache. - _log-dir/userlogs/attempt-id_ will still have 777 permissions with all the files inside created by linuxTaskController but owned by the user. This is done because -- attempt-id dir has to be writable by the child for log.tmp which is done periodically in synclogs. -- attempt-dir has to be readable by TT for log serving and writable by TT also by cleanup. Long time, the correct solution is for this directory to be owned by the child, but cleaned up by TT using a LinuxTaskController binary lauch to swith user. Pending items from Devaraj's comments: - It will be nice to combine the APIs for creating files/directories and setting appropriate permissions all in one API - DiskChecker.java has lot of code to do with permissions handling to make it generic but not everything would be actually used. In fact, the approach taken in making some APIs generic is debatable. We might as well keep it simple for now and extend those APIs as and when required. - LocalDirAllocator.getSecureLocalPathForWrite could be renamed as getPrivateLocalPathForEWrite Extra: - Test TaskTracker.initializeJobDirs - Extra tests in taskcontroller.c - Test various scenarios of finalizeTaskDirs - Finish tests for jvm reuse There are some minor TODO's also left to do. > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-65-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 11:43:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63474 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 11:43:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 11:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 31281 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 11:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31242 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 11:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31232 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 11:43:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:43:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:43:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A32234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1949476113.1246621367192.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt Uploading patches that include the rest of the comments, except bq. # It will be nice to combine the APIs for creating files/directories and setting appropriate permissions all in one API There are very few occurrences of above now in the code. So dropping this. The patches can be reviewed, while I try any possible code reuse/refactoring and making test-cases comprehensive. > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-66-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 17:20:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5729 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 17:20:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 17:20:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 48182 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 17:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48164 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 17:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48139 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 17:14:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:14:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B715234C055 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <105865310.1246641227373.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:13:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727052#action_12727052 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I think we need to take a step back. The contention is that the specific knobs in question have long-term ramifications. In particular putting these in the framework proper, as opposed to specific schedulers, impose constraints on _all_ schedulers regardless. We are happy to have specific schedulers targeted for specific use-cases/workloads support them, but we are opposed to allowing features which jeopardize one over the other, especially in the rather obvious way as we've highlighted above. In the past, and possibly in the future, we will make some choices which hurt use-case one over the other; in which case we will almost always be biased towards large, multi-user clusters. ---- Having said that, there are *some* workarounds even with the CapacityScheduler (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?focusedCommentId=12726751&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12726751) if people are so inclined. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-67-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 18:08:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33888 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 18:08:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 18:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 6680 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6642 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6557 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 18:08:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:08:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:08:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48069234C055 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1463158320.1246644467294.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:07:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727072#action_12727072 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I've opened MAPREDUCE-704 to add per-node task limits in the fair scheduler. In addition, MAPREDUCE-698 is for per-pool task limits. Are people alright with having per-pool limits instead of per-job limits? Pools allow you to group multiple jobs under the same limit. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-68-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 18:29:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52427 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 18:29:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 18:29:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 29872 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29831 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29821 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 18:30:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:30:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:30:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3878C234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1448788359.1246645787223.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727081#action_12727081 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- I can just put all my jobs into a single pool, and have the same functionality I would have now, correct? > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-69-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 18:39:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57997 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 18:39:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 18:39:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36819 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:40:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36781 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:40:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36765 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 18:40:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:40:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:40:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D4E234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1107413393.1246646387219.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:39:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727087#action_12727087 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- You'd be able to place a limit on the whole pool - for example, 100 maps. If you submit one job at a time to the pool, then that job will get the whole limit. However, if you submit two jobs, they will share it, and they will get 100 maps in total, not 100 each. Right now the jobs will do fair sharing, meaning that each job will get 50 maps. However, FIFO scheduling within a pool will also be supported by the fair scheduler in the future (I have a fairly well-tested patch for it that I am porting to trunk). > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-70-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 18:48:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59317 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 18:48:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 18:48:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 41947 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41910 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 18:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41750 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 18:48:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:48:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B31234C053 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2037891107.1246646867341.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:47:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727093#action_12727093 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- So pooling is just a one-time thing when I submit the job? It's not something that persists and I submit things into? I'm a big consumer of MR but have been on a need-to-know basis with respect to these things. I guess I now need to know. Again, part of what I liked about this issue/solution was that it's powerful, accessible, and easy to understand. I understand the concerns of larger users and the need to support this... And I would again ask if we could stick it into a corner somewhere so that it's still easy to access but does not get in the way of everything else. Otherwise, what I'd be interested in is an explanation / example of how users of this patch might accomplish the same types of things. For example, only allowing a particular job to use one task per node (or even total tasks at a time = total nodes). And at the same time, having other jobs that I allow 10s of tasks per node. I'm not following how that would work. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-71-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 20:31:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93529 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 20:31:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22889 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22852 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22842 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:31:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53000234C053 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1193262499.1246653047339.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727122#action_12727122 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- No, pools are persistent. You submit a job to a particular pool by setting a jobconf property (e.g. set pool.name="my_pool"). Then you'll be able to have caps on total maps or total reduces running for each pool. For example, you could limit your DB import pool to 20 mappers, and then *all* DB import jobs together will get no more than 10 mappers. I was planning to make the per-node limits be on a per job basis as in the current patch. However, for the per-job limits, it seemed to make more sense to let them apply across multiple jobs by placing them on a pool. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-72-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 20:31:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93542 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 20:31:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22955 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22919 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22887 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 20:31:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:31:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E6234C4B2 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <148761204.1246653047517.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Matei Zaharia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727124#action_12727124 ] Matei Zaharia commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- So in other words, to answer your second question, limiting one job to one task/node will be done as in the current patch (with mapred.max.maps.per.node). > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-73-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 20:37:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95624 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 20:37:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 20:37:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 25900 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:37:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25863 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 20:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25848 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 20:37:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:37:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B678234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1756707390.1246653407229.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jonathan Gray (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727127#action_12727127 ] Jonathan Gray commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- Makes sense. Thanks Matei. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-74-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 03 21:23:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7889 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2009 21:23:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2009 21:23:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 56246 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 21:23:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56208 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2009 21:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56198 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2009 21:23:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:23:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:23:14 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4DF234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <704374866.1246656173507.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:22:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727143#action_12727143 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------- I'm not enamored of this approach and would like to propose a slightly heavier-weight, but, I think, cleaner approach than stuffing more logic into the Configuration class. My apologies for coming to this conversation a bit late. If you don't want to read a long e-mail, skip down to the code examples at the bottom. :) Before I get to the proposal, I wanted to lay out what I think the goals are. Note that HADOOP-475 is also related. * Standardization of configuration names, documentation, and value formats. Today, the names tend to appear in the code, or, at best, in constants in the code, and the documentation, when it exists, may be in -default.xml. It would be nice if it was very difficult to avoid writing documentation for the variable you're introducing. Right now there are and have been a handful of bugs where the default in the code is different than the default in the XML file, and that gets really confusing. * Backwards compatibility. We'd love to rename "mapred.foo" and "mr.bar" to be consistent, but we want to maintain backwards compatibility. This ticket is all about that. * Availability to user code. Users should be able to use configuration the same way the core does. Users pass information to their jobs via Configuration, and they should use the same mechanism. This is true today. * Type-safety. Configurations have a handful of recurring types: number of bytes, filename, URI, hostport combination, arrays of paths, etc. The parsing is done in an ad-hoc fashion, which is a shame, since it doesn't have to be. It would be nice to have some generic runtime checking of configuration parameters, too, and perhaps even ranges (that number can't be negative!). * Upgradeability to a different configuration format. I don't think we'll leave a place where configuration has to be a key->value map (especially because of "availability to user code", but it would eventually be nice if configuration could be queried from other places, or if the values could have a bit more structure. (For example, we could use XML to separate out a list of paths, instead of blindly using comma-delimited, unescaped text.) * Development ease. It ought to be easier to find the places where configuration is used. Today the best we can do is a grep, and then follow references manually. * Autogenerated documentation. No-brainer. * Ability to specify visibility, scope, and stability. Alogn the lines of HADOOP-5073, configuration variables should be classified as deprecated, unstable, evolving, and stable. It would be nice to introduce variables (say, that were used for tuning), with the expectation that they are not part of the public API. Use at your own risk sort of thing. My proposal is to represent every configuration variable that's accessed in the Hadoop code by a static instance of a ConfigVariable class. The interface is something like: {code} public interface ConfigValue { T get(Configuration conf); T getDefault(); void set(Configuration conf, T value); String getHelp(); } {code} There's more than one way to implement this. Here's one proposal that uses Java annotations: {code} @ConfigDescription(help="Some help text", visibility=Visibility.PUBLIC) @ConfigAccessors({ @ConfigAccessor(name="common.sample"), @ConfigAccessor(name="core.sample", deprecated="Use common.sample instead") }) public final static ConfigVariable myConfigVariable = ConfigVariables.newIntConfigVariable(15 /* default value */); {code} This approach would require pre-processing (at build time) the annotations into a data file, and then, at runtime, querying this data file. (It's not easily possible to get at the annotations on the field from within myConfigVariable.) I'm half-way to getting this working, and I actually think something like the following would be better: {code} @ConfigVariableDeclaration public final static ConfigVariable fsDefaultName = ConfigVariableBuilder.newURI() .setDefault(null) .setHelp("Default filesystem") .setVisibility(Visibility.PUBLIC) .addAccessor("fs.default.name") .addDeprecatedAccessor("core.default.fs", "Use foo instead") .addValidator(new ValidateSupportedFilesystem()); {code} This would still require build-time preprocessing (javac supports this) to find the variables, instantiate them, and output the documentation, but the rest of the processing is easy at runtime. A drawback of this approach is how to handle the defaults that default to other variables. Perhaps the easiest thing to do is to handle the same syntax we support now, like 'addIndirectDefault("${default.dir}/mapred")', but something that references the other variable directly is more appealing, e.g.: 'addIndirectDefault(OtherClass.class, "fieldname")'. I think this can be implemented relatively quickly, with little impact on breaking stuff (because the old way of using Configuration continues to work). What do you think? > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-75-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 04 03:51:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32825 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2009 03:51:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jul 2009 03:51:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 27315 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 03:51:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27279 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2009 03:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27262 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2009 03:51:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:51:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:51:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB37234C004 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <432329017.1246679447640.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:50:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727182#action_12727182 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-5170: ------------------------------------- Thought about it and i buy the argument that these knobs should not have been added in the core framework. So +1 for reverting this patch. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-76-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 10:06:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78966 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 10:06:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 10:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 79411 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 10:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79372 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 10:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79362 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 10:06:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA07234C04C for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <178650067.1246874774976.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:06:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727460#action_12727460 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6105: ------------------------------------------ Philip, this seems a very ambitious change to the Configuration framework. Before I can comment further, I would like to take a look at the exact JIRA where this is being discussed. Though I could find out a couple of JIRAs that seem related, none had all the points that you've mentioned here. Can you point me to such a jira, if it exists ? If not, I think it is important to open a new JIRA to discuss these points. That way it will find a better audience and we can discuss better. Please let me know about this. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-77-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 11:22:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6017 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 11:22:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 11:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 54703 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 11:22:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54672 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 11:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54662 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 11:22:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:22:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:22:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2060234C053 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1085003647.1246879334924.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jothi Padmanabhan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6126) Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6126 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Jothi Padmanabhan The recent hadoopqa results on test patches do not seem to have the links to the actual tests that failed. For example, http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/356/testReport/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-78-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 16:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80562 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 16:07:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 16:07:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 44657 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 16:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44627 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 16:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44617 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 16:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9E8234C051 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1673508918.1246896434902.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6126) Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures In-Reply-To: <1085003647.1246879334924.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley reassigned HADOOP-6126: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6126 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Jothi Padmanabhan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > The recent hadoopqa results on test patches do not seem to have the links to the actual tests that failed. > For example, http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/356/testReport/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-79-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 16:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3095 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 16:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 16:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 17820 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 16:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17785 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 16:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17775 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 16:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C16234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <437553404.1246898835465.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727615#action_12727615 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------- Hemanth, This JIRA is about backwards-compatibility of deprecated keys, which is something my comment addresses, so I thought it fit in well here. Think of it as an alternative solution to the problem you're trying to solve by keeping the map of deprecated keys in Configuration.java. Keeping a deprecation map is expedient and simple, but I think it may hamper a better, longer-term solution. The design goals above are "out of thin air" (in the sense that they haven't been discussed on JIRA outside of the JIRAs mentioned above and MAPREDUCE-475), though I hope they're reasonable. They were discussed a bit at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/DeveloperOffsite20090612, too. That said, I hope they help to frame the conversation a bit I very very much want there to be a path to be able to rename configuration keys, but I want to make sure that the solution that comes out of this JIRA is compatible with some future work. -- Philip > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-80-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 17:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13220 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 17:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 17:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 49532 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49496 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49482 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 17:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DAC234C04C for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <676967224.1246900034858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6127) The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6127 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6127 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Reporter: Owen O'Malley The real user name should be used by FsShell instead of the one in the configuration. This will make it a tiny bit harder for someone to pretend to be someone else to the file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-81-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 17:13:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16439 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 17:13:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 17:13:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 54894 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:13:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54857 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:13:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54847 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 17:13:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:13:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B85234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <782288749.1246900394803.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6127) The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. In-Reply-To: <676967224.1246900034858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727624#action_12727624 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6127: ------------------------------------- How can you get the "real" username without being subject to spoofing? It seems to me that the user can always play LD_PRELOAD tricks so that the call out to "whoami" goes to "evil-whoami.sh". Without something like identd or real token-based authentication I don't know that it's really possible to add any security here. > The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6127 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6127 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > > The real user name should be used by FsShell instead of the one in the configuration. This will make it a tiny bit harder for someone to pretend to be someone else to the file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-82-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 17:45:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46885 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 17:45:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 17:45:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 20075 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:45:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20039 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 17:45:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20029 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 17:45:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:45:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0F3234C055 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <446837415.1246902314969.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6127) The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. In-Reply-To: <676967224.1246900034858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727637#action_12727637 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6127: --------------------------------------- This isn't about making it secure. It is just about removing the ability to spoof from the command line interface to Hadoop. Even after this change, it is still easy to spoof without getting to LD_PRELOAD. Of course to get to real security, you need authentication via Kerberos or something similar. > The real user name should be used by bin/hadoop fs (ie. FsShell) instead of the one in the configuration. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6127 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6127 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > > The real user name should be used by FsShell instead of the one in the configuration. This will make it a tiny bit harder for someone to pretend to be someone else to the file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-83-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 06 18:01:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62442 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 18:01:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 18:01:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 42912 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 18:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42877 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 18:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42867 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 18:01:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:01:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:01:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB544234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1461589198.1246903274828.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5837) TestHdfsProxy fails in Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727649#action_12727649 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5837: ------------------------------------------------ Zhiyong, thanks for checking this. BTW, TestHdfsProxy keeps failing from [the first build|http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Hadoop/job/Hdfs-Patch-vesta.apache.org/0/testReport/] to [the latest build|http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Hadoop/job/Hdfs-Patch-vesta.apache.org/4/testReport/] in [Hudson|http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Hadoop/job/Hdfs-Patch-vesta.apache.org/] after the project split. Could you take a look? Thanks again. > TestHdfsProxy fails in Linux > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5837 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5837 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/hdfsproxy > Environment: Linux hostname 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > test-junit: > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 4.397 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestProxyUgiManager > [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.219 sec > BUILD FAILED > /home/tsz/hadoop/latest/build.xml:1022: The following error occurred while executing this line: > /home/tsz/hadoop/latest/src/contrib/build.xml:48: The following error occurred while executing this line: > /home/tsz/hadoop/latest/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/build.xml:224: Tests failed! > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-84-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 00:33:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60172 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 00:33:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 00:33:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 13380 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13343 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13333 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9326234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2022618474.1246926794878.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6121) High Availability support for Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727848#action_12727848 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6121: --------------------------------------------- Jie Qiu> we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves Are you aware of BackupNode introduced in HADOOP-4539? I thought the log shipping part has been solved by that. Or did you mean anything else? Jie Qiu> Memory write means changes to the BTree, What B-tree did you mean? Jie Qiu> Standby heartbeat primary and take over if it feels primary down How exactly the standby will decide ("feel" in your terms) that the primary is down? Also it would be really good to have a document, which gives a general overview and details of your design. You can refer to other jiras for examples. We used to have design documents for large changes like the one you are attempting here. > High Availability support for Hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs, mapred > Reporter: Jie Qiu > > Currently, We look at the HA of Hadoop cluster. We need to consider the NameNode HA as well as Jobtracker HA. For NameNode, we want to build primary/standy or master-slaves pattern to provide NameNode HA. Therefore, we need to consider how to ship log between primary/standby/slaves and how commit "write" operation to NameNode after the agreement among primary/standby/slaves on log. Whether will we use Linux HA package or NameNode-built-in HA package without the help of outter Linux HA package. > After NameNode become high availability, is it necessary to provide HA for Jobtracker? Can Jobtracker persist the states of Jobs and tasks into HA NameNode? Or Jobtracker also needs the same approach from NameNode for HA support. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-85-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:47:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85375 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 49337 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49298 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49288 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE64E234C1E9 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <647684764.1246931234910.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-5482: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-86-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85426 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 49450 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49375 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49355 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB882234C056 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1736854615.1246931234898.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-5482: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-87-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85435 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 49459 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49377 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49356 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89AB234C04C for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1145550975.1246931234886.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball reopened HADOOP-5482: ----------------------------------- This issue was marked "Resolved" but it was never applied to the 20 branch or trunk (for that matter, it never seems to have gone through Hudson). I need Oracle support on 20/trunk, so I'm reopening this issue to revisit this patch. > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-88-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87303 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 52257 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52220 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52210 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5233234C056 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1758403885.1246931354872.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-5482: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.19.0, 0.18.3, 0.18.2 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-89-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:49:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87622 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 52361 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52323 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52312 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:49:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:49:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB331234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <830728616.1246931354817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727870#action_12727870 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-5482: --------------------------------------- Attaching patches for 20-branch and trunk based on the original patch posted here. This rebases the work onto the new API in trunk. Also fixes indentation problems in the initial version of the patch. (The new code was indented at the wrong level.) Since this adds a db product-specific field, I also used this to set a flag necessary in MySQL, but that's a trivial difference. I have tested this and verified that it works with Oracle and MySQL locally. No new tests because we don't have an Oracle driver that can be checked in to Hadoop. > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-90-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 01:51:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88183 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 01:51:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 01:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 56259 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:51:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56222 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 01:51:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56212 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 01:51:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:51:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:51:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB87D234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <968067235.1246931474818.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5482) org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-5482: ---------------------------------- Priority: Major (was: Blocker) Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) Removing "Reviewed" flag since my code hasn't been reviewed. Also downgrading priority from "BLOCKER" to Major. > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5482 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.18.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1 > Environment: Java 1.6, HAdoop0.19.0, Linux..Oracle, > Reporter: evanand > Attachments: HADOOP-5482.20-branch.patch, HADOOP-5482.patch, HADOOP-5482.trunk.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.db.DBInputformat not working with oracle. > The out of the box implementation of the Hadoop is working properly with mysql/hsqldb, but NOT with oracle. > Reason is DBInputformat is implemented with mysql/hsqldb specific query constructs like "LIMIT", "OFFSET". > FIX: > building a database provider specific logic based on the database providername (which we can get using connection). > I HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED IT FOR ORACLE...READY TO CHECK_IN CODE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-91-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 02:56:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12119 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 02:56:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 02:56:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 99717 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 02:56:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99678 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 02:56:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99668 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 02:56:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:56:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B02234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <903874219.1246935374817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727888#action_12727888 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6099: --------------------------------------------- I see. So you want to be able to set ipc.client.ping = false - no ping, and at the same time ipc.ping.interval = 20, which is now treated not as ping interva because there are no pingsl, but as a client timeout. > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Attachments: ipcPing.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-92-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 03:02:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15203 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 03:02:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 03:02:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 6196 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 03:02:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6161 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 03:02:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6151 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 03:02:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:02:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:02:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C08234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <848373541.1246935734812.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:02:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727891#action_12727891 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------------ @Konstantin: your assumption is right. is this ok with you? > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Attachments: ipcPing.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-93-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 05:00:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50671 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 05:00:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 05:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69536 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 05:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69494 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 05:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69479 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 05:00:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:00:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:00:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC7234C056 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <809176167.1246942814915.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt Adding new patches: - Cleaned up the common part of the code a little. After going through the patch, realized that the changes to LocalDirAllocator can be done away with and so reverted most of the changes. Now we only need a way to set permissions and so retained setPermissions and related api but moved them to FileUtil. - Found a bug related to task localization. With the attached patch, we create attempt directories also on all the disks. This has to be done because job directory is writable only by the TT and so the child cannot create non-existing attempt dirs on certain disks on demand. Freezing up any further changes till review comments are put up. > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-94-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 06:12:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86913 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 06:12:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 06:12:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 18313 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 06:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18281 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 06:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18248 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 06:12:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:12:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:12:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDED3234C004 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1676321853.1246947134828.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727939#action_12727939 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4493: ----------------------------------- *This issue's focus* Given the state of the art, what do we mean by restrictive permissions for files in distributed cache? *Case I: The cache files are completely private to the job-owner* - The job owner wants his/her files only for himself/herself and doesn't want access to anyone else. - This means 700 permissions and owned by the job owner, so only the job owner can access it. - To facilitate the above, the cache should be localized under a directory with user name. - The files should be usable by subsequent jobs of the same user. - The configurable size limit of the cache or in other words the disk quota for the cache files should be per user. - Because the files are owned by the user, we will need a task-controller process launch during cleaning-up/purging. *Case II: The job owner is fine with sharing his/her distributed cache files with other users* - A possible use case for this, as mentioned on HADOOP-4490, is a multiple of users, perhaps working on the same project that requires the same data files, want to share these files across multiple jobs of possibly other users. - The above would mean _55 permissions for everyone. - The files should be localized under a common directory not associated to any user name. - There should be a configuration knob(per cache URI?) to be specified by the user so as to distinguish these files from the ones that belong to CASE I. - The disk quota for the cache files should be a global one and not specific to the user. - The files can be owned by the job owner or the TT itself. -- Having TT own the files makes it easy for cleaning up. -- If the ownership is with the job-owner, we would need a task-controller process launch. We we also need user information with the files, perhaps through a sub-directory associated with a user name. So, do we want only CASE I or only CASE II or a combination of both? Thoughts/comments? > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-95-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 06:44:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6630 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 06:44:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 06:44:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 34239 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 06:44:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34197 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 06:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34187 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 06:44:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:44:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:44:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE44A234C051 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1238693994.1246949054909.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727944#action_12727944 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4493: ----------------------------------- One more (hybrid) case is possible. *CASE III: When job owner wants to share with a specific list of users that he mentions.* - A minor variant of CASE II. - Job owner either specifies the list of users or a group of users with which he wants to share libraries. - With most of the other things being the same as in CASE II, the api in DistributedCache should make sure that the access is restricted only to the list of users or the group specified. - Even here, the access list should be per cache uri. > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-96-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 12:26:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61515 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 12:26:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 12:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 89418 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 12:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89390 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 12:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89380 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 12:26:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:26:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BB7234C04C for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1331823974.1246969574858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6128) Serializer and Deserializer should extend java.io.Closeable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Serializer and Deserializer should extend java.io.Closeable ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6128 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6128 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Reporter: Tom White This change wouldn't change behaviour or the API, but would make it possible to use such utilities as IOUtils#closeStream() on Serializers and Deserializers. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-97-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 17:26:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41198 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:26:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:26:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 87398 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87360 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87350 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4AE234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1435702500.1246987574814.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "gary murry (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5587) Feature Designs and Test Plans templates in HTML MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gary murry updated HADOOP-5587: ------------------------------- Attachment: TestPlanTemplate.html The new version includes more examples. > Feature Designs and Test Plans templates in HTML > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5587 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5587 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: gary murry > Attachments: DesignDocTemplate.html, DesignDocTemplate.html, TestPlanTemplate.html, TestPlanTemplate.html, TestPlanTemplate.html, TestPlanTemplate.html > > > This Jira is to address an existing email thread which requested a Feature Design template and Test Plan template in HTML format. > Past Design Doc Examples > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12348296/DFSUpgradeProposal3.html > Past Test Plan Examples > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12373559/PermissionsTestPlan2.pdf > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12363605/BlockCrcFeatureTestPlan.pdf > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12351299/TestPlan-HdfsUpgrade.html > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-98-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 17:37:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17608 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:37:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 875 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 831 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 813 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:19 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24E9234C4DF for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <562696707.1246988176795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-516) Eclipse-based GUI: DFS explorer and basic Map/Reduce job launcher MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-516?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1272= 8223#action_12728223 ]=20 Hudson commented on HADOOP-516: ------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #15 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.o= rg/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/15/]) =20 > Eclipse-based GUI: DFS explorer and basic Map/Reduce job launcher > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-516 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-516 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Eclipse 3.2 > JDK 1.5 > Reporter: Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Bertin > Attachments: hdfsExplorer.zip, hdfsExplorer2.zip > > > to increase productivity in our current project (which makes a heavy use = of Hadoop), we wrote a small Eclipse-based GUI application which basically = consists in 2 views: > * a HDFS explorer adapted from Eclipse filesystem explorer example. > For now, it includes the following features: > o classical tree-based browsing interface, with directory > content being detailed in a 3 columns table (file name, file > size, file type) > o refresh button > o delete file or directory (with confirm dialog): select files > in the tree or table and click the "Delete" button > o rename file or directory: simple click on the file in the > table, type the new name and validate > o open file with system editor: select the file in the table > and click "Open" button (works on Windows, not on Linux) > o internal drag & drop > o external drag & drop from the local filesystem to the HDFS > (the opposite doesn't work) > * a MapReduce *very* simple job launcher: > o select the job XML configuration file > o run the job > o kill the job > o visualize map and reduce progress with progress bars > o open a browser on the Hadoop job tracker web interface=20 > INSTALLATION NOTES: > - Eclipse 3.2 > - JDK 1.5 > - import the archive in Eclipse > - copy your hadoop conf file (hadoop-default.xml in "src" folder) -> thi= s step should be moved in the GUI later > - right-click on the project and Run As -> Eclipse Application > - enjoy... --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-99-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 17:37:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17831 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 947 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 908 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 898 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:20 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5720234C4AC for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <267415001.1246988176873.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6112) to fix hudsonPatchQueueAdmin for different projects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728225#action_12728225 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6112: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #15 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/15/]) > to fix hudsonPatchQueueAdmin for different projects > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6112 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6112 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6112.patch > > > To fix hudsonPatchQueueAdmin process for different hadoop projects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-100-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 17:37:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18966 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:37:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 1639 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1608 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1598 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:22 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBBF234C1EE for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1566034566.1246988178124.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6122) 64 javac compiler warnings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728237#action_12728237 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6122: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #15 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/15/]) > 64 javac compiler warnings > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6122 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: c6122_20090630.patch > > > Ran "ant test-patch" with a empty patch. Got > {noformat} > [exec] -1 javac. The applied patch generated 64 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 124 warnings). > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-101-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 17:37:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26300 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 17:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 2464 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2427 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2417 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 17:37:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:37:42 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCB5234C4C3 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1318175713.1246988178707.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:36:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6106) Provide an option in ShellCommandExecutor to timeout commands that do not complete within a certain amount of time. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728246#action_12728246 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #15 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/15/]) > Provide an option in ShellCommandExecutor to timeout commands that do not complete within a certain amount of time. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6106-1.patch, HADOOP-6106-2.patch, HADOOP-6106.patch, mapred-211-common-3.patch > > > In MAPREDUCE-211 we came across a need to provide an option to timeout commands launched via the ShellCommandExecutor. The use case is for the health check script being developed in MAPREDUCE-211. We would like the TaskTracker thread to not be blocked by a problematic script or in instances where fork()+exec() has hung (which apparently has been observed in large clusters). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-102-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 18:20:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83257 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 18:20:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 18:20:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 77752 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77662 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77626 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 18:20:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:20:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F652234C1F0 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1896745446.1246990815062.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:20:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "gary murry (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5976) create script to provide classpath for external tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728275#action_12728275 ] gary murry commented on HADOOP-5976: ------------------------------------ Also, the -1 javac is related to HADOOP-6122. > create script to provide classpath for external tools > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h5976.patch, Hadoop-5976.patch > > > It would be useful for tools building on top of Hadoop to have a script that returns the class path that is needed to get all of the Hadoop jars and the needed libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-103-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 18:42:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80261 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 18:42:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 18:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16239 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:42:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16202 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16192 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 18:42:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:42:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0541234C1EB for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <622653073.1246992134918.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5976) create script to provide classpath for external tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-5976: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > create script to provide classpath for external tools > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h5976.patch, Hadoop-5976.patch > > > It would be useful for tools building on top of Hadoop to have a script that returns the class path that is needed to get all of the Hadoop jars and the needed libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-104-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 19:08:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9465 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 19:08:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 19:08:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 27755 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:52:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27739 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 18:52:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27728 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 18:52:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:52:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:52:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526B234C051 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1311128733.1246992734862.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5976) create script to provide classpath for external tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-5976. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Release Note: Add a new hadoop script command, classpath, to print the class path needed to get the Hadoop jar and the required libraries. I have committed this. Thanks, Owen and Gary! > create script to provide classpath for external tools > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5976.patch, Hadoop-5976.patch > > > It would be useful for tools building on top of Hadoop to have a script that returns the class path that is needed to get all of the Hadoop jars and the needed libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-105-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 19:22:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79588 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 19:22:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 19:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 79145 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:22:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79111 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79101 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 19:22:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:22:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:22:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA47234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <491348910.1246994535031.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "gary murry (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5976) create script to provide classpath for external tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728306#action_12728306 ] gary murry commented on HADOOP-5976: ------------------------------------ Great, thanks! -Gary > create script to provide classpath for external tools > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5976.patch, Hadoop-5976.patch > > > It would be useful for tools building on top of Hadoop to have a script that returns the class path that is needed to get all of the Hadoop jars and the needed libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-106-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 19:36:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14408 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 19:36:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 19:36:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11808 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11769 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:36:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11759 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 19:36:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:36:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:36:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D731E234C1E9 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6129) MapFile doesn't worh with serializables other than Writables MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org MapFile doesn't worh with serializables other than Writables ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6129 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io, mapred Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: Justin Patterson Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-107-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 19:38:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15504 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 19:38:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 19:38:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 17740 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17696 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17605 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61218234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1540923342.1246995495386.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6129) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Patterson updated HADOOP-6129: ------------------------------------- Summary: MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables (was: MapFile doesn't worh with serializables other than Writables) > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6129 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Justin Patterson > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-108-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 20:08:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49751 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 20:08:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 20:08:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 74293 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74258 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74199 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 20:08:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:08:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA82234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1330948080.1246997294837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728332#action_12728332 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6099: --------------------------------------------- Yes I think this is fine. +1 > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Attachments: ipcPing.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-109-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 20:10:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55712 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 20:10:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 78372 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78333 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78323 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:10:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:10:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BA0234C1F0 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <296905026.1246997414932.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6129) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Patterson updated HADOOP-6129: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6129.patch Patch attached. > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6129 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6129.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-110-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 20:10:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55771 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 20:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 78509 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78474 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78454 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 20:10:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:10:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:10:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EFF234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1374119191.1246997414822.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6129) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Patterson updated HADOOP-6129: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Here's the patch that I used to get this working in my own app. It basically uses the SerializationFactory for key/value serialization. The key comparator is either specified by the Writer creator or, for legacy reasons, is created through WritableComparator.get(). The MapFileOutputFormat creates the key comparator using job.getMapOutputKeyComparator(). > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6129 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6129.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-111-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 20:38:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15066 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 20:38:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 20:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 18272 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18232 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18222 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 20:38:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:38:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:38:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDD2234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1422588907.1246999094912.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-5170: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h5170.patch This is the patch to rollback the change. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-112-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 20:46:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18963 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 20:46:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 20:46:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 32122 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:46:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32078 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 20:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31948 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 20:46:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:46:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:46:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F6B234C1E6 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1600385821.1246999574941.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728358#action_12728358 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5170: --------------------------------------- +1 > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: mapred > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-113-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 21:42:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7058 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 21:42:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 21:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 99919 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 21:42:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99881 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 21:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99871 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 21:42:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:42:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4092234C1E6 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1683137722.1247002934867.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6129) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728374#action_12728374 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6129: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412780/HADOOP-6129.patch against trunk revision 791937. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/556/console This message is automatically generated. > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6129 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6129 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6129.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-114-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 22:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34107 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 22:41:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 22:41:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 58771 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 22:41:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58734 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 22:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58724 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 22:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:41:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B87234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <327888318.1247006474801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728399#action_12728399 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------------- I tried the change. It works. I noticed that unlike before I have to setup JAVA_HOME in hadoop-env.sh. This is not picked up from JAVA_HOME environment variable from my shell. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-115-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 07 23:05:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62909 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2009 23:05:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2009 23:05:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 82093 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 23:05:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82020 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2009 23:05:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81728 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2009 23:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:05:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8F0234C4A9 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <281553019.1247007915054.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:05:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728409#action_12728409 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------------ {code} +if [ -d "$HADOOP_CORE_HOME/build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Core/common" ]; then +for f in $HADOOP_CORE_HOME/build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Core/common/*.jar; do + CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:$f; +done +fi {code} The for-loop above can be eliminated by keeping the wild card (shown below) as what we does in the bin/hadoop script. {code} if [ -d "$HADOOP_CORE_HOME/build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Core/common" ]; then CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:$HADOOP_CORE_HOME/build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Core/common/*.jar; fi {code} Try also the new "bin/hadoop classpath" command committed (HADOOP-5976) recently. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-116-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 00:35:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58549 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 00:35:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 00:35:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16962 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 00:35:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16918 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 00:35:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16908 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 00:35:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:35:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:35:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5663234C1E9 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <536621156.1247013314938.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4901) Upgrade to JUnit 4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728443#action_12728443 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-4901: -------------------------------------------- Here's a comment on JUnitExt remarks. It seems that JUnit Extension project supports the categorization of some kind. However, it seems that the semantic of their @Category is very different from our desire for tagging is. Here's the excerpt from JUnitExt tutorial: {panel:title=JUnitExt tutorial's excerpt} How to use categories Tests can be categorized, to sort them for different puporses. JUnitExt provides a CategoryTextListerner, which prints out at end of test run all categories, with status of tests listed: May be Success, Ignored, Failed. You can plugin the category text listener using following code: (see also org.junitext.samples package) JUnitCore core = new JUnitCore(); // use for categories special listener, give some statistics core.addListener(new CategoryTextListener(System.out)); core.run(SimpleTest.class); The output when running thes tests will be: I. Time: 0 OK (1 test) Category: equal tests Success testEquals(org.junitext.samples.SimpleTest) Category: math tests Ignored divideByZero(org.junitext.samples.SimpleTest) {panel} It might be possible to extend or develop new ClassRunner which will be capable of running only tests from a specified @Category, however it isn't provided by JUnitExt out of the box or the documentation fails no mention it. > Upgrade to JUnit 4 > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4901 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Alex Loddengaard > > Amongst other things, JUnit 4 has better support for class-wide set up and tear down (via @BeforeClass and @AfterClass annotations), and more flexible assertions (http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/ReleaseNotes4.4.html). It would be nice to be able to take advantage of these features in tests we write. > JUnit 4 can run tests written for JUnit 3.8.1 without any changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-117-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 01:03:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67394 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 01:03:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 01:03:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 29950 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 01:03:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29911 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 01:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29901 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 01:03:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:03:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC678234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1434776397.1247014994824.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4901) Upgrade to JUnit 4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728453#action_12728453 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-4901: -------------------------------------------- I've done some additional investigation on Spring-test framework and it seems that the tagging solution is already in place there. Here's an example: {code:title=MyTests.java} @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) @TestExecutionListeners( {}) public class MyTests { @BeforeClass public static void setUp() { System.out.println("test-group is set to: " + System.getProperty("test-group")); } @Test @IfProfileValue(name = "test-group", values = { "fast", "quick" }) public void testOne() { System.out.println("testOne(): Quick stuff"); } @Test @IfProfileValue(name = "test-group", value = "fast") public void testTwo() { System.out.println("testTwo(): Fast stuff"); } } {code} then to run say 'fast' tests one just need to specify -Dtest-group=fast at run time. This solution requires a couple of jars to be pulled down from Maven repo, but other than that is it quite clear and easy to implement. I have found a couple of the issues with Spring-test framework which will affect this approach or at least might slightly postpone it. See http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5145 and but the fix is coming in the release 3.0 of Spring, which is around the corner. Other minor issues are: http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5902, http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5903 but these are rather improvements than bugs. > Upgrade to JUnit 4 > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4901 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Alex Loddengaard > > Amongst other things, JUnit 4 has better support for class-wide set up and tear down (via @BeforeClass and @AfterClass annotations), and more flexible assertions (http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/ReleaseNotes4.4.html). It would be nice to be able to take advantage of these features in tests we write. > JUnit 4 can run tests written for JUnit 3.8.1 without any changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-118-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 04:22:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82228 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 04:22:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 04:22:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 53282 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 04:22:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53184 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 04:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53166 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 04:22:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:22:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:22:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8BE29A0016 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <391264787.1247026935111.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728497#action_12728497 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6105: --------------------------------------- Phillip, I think this is too much structure for what is gained. In particular, it replaces a relatively simple string to string map with a lot of code. Where does all of the code go? How does it interact with user's job conf? How do we document it? I think we should go ahead with the simple approach for now... > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-119-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 04:40:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51757 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 04:40:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 04:40:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 71516 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71479 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71466 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73E5234C1E6 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <770941932.1247028014946.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728503#action_12728503 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-4493: --------------------------------------- I think the default should be case 1, with completely private distributed caches. I believe that we don't need sharing with a group, and can probably delay doing case 2 (global sharing) until later. Thoughts? > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-120-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 05:44:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6050 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 05:44:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 05:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 13482 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 05:44:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13442 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 05:44:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13432 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 05:44:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:44:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:44:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66DD234C051 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2099190480.1247031854877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suman Sehgal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6130) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6130 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: mapred Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: Suman Sehgal Priority: Critical KeyFieldBasedPartitioner throws "KeyFieldBasedPartitioner" when some part of the specified key is missing. Scenario : ======= when value of num.key.fields.for.partition is greater than the separators provided in the input. Command: ======== hadoop jar streaming.jar -Dmapred.reduce.tasks=3 -Dnum.key.fields.for.partition=5 -input -output -mapper org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper -reducer org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityReducer -inputformat org.apache.hadoop.mapred.KeyValueTextInputFormat -partitioner org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-121-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 05:58:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37650 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 05:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 05:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 27220 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 05:58:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27181 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 05:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27171 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 05:58:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:58:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:58:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D5234C004 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1784601717.1247032694791.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suman Sehgal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6130) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner In-Reply-To: <2099190480.1247031854877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728521#action_12728521 ] Suman Sehgal commented on HADOOP-6130: -------------------------------------- Stack trace: ========= java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 42 at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner.hashCode(KeyFieldBasedPartitioner.java:95) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner.getPartition(KeyFieldBasedPartitioner.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:801) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper.map(IdentityMapper.java:40) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:50) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runOldMapper(MapTask.java:356) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6130 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Priority: Critical > > KeyFieldBasedPartitioner throws "KeyFieldBasedPartitioner" when some part of the specified key is missing. > Scenario : > ======= > when value of num.key.fields.for.partition is greater than the separators provided in the input. > Command: > ======== > hadoop jar streaming.jar -Dmapred.reduce.tasks=3 -Dnum.key.fields.for.partition=5 -input -output -mapper org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper -reducer org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityReducer -inputformat org.apache.hadoop.mapred.KeyValueTextInputFormat -partitioner org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-122-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 09:18:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88287 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 09:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 54844 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54818 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54808 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:18:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:18:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40FE234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2062532079.1247044694798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6130) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner In-Reply-To: <2099190480.1247031854877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6130: -------------------------------- Priority: Major (was: Critical) Assignee: Amar Kamat Lowering the priority since this bug would affect only those jobs that specify partitioning based on some key fields, and the generated keys doesn't have enough fields. > ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6130 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Amar Kamat > > KeyFieldBasedPartitioner throws "KeyFieldBasedPartitioner" when some part of the specified key is missing. > Scenario : > ======= > when value of num.key.fields.for.partition is greater than the separators provided in the input. > Command: > ======== > hadoop jar streaming.jar -Dmapred.reduce.tasks=3 -Dnum.key.fields.for.partition=5 -input -output -mapper org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper -reducer org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityReducer -inputformat org.apache.hadoop.mapred.KeyValueTextInputFormat -partitioner org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-123-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 10:30:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39784 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 10:30:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 37908 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37869 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37859 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA9F234C4AC for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1590118913.1247049015128.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:30:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang reassigned HADOOP-6131: --------------------------------- Assignee: Hong Tang > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-124-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 10:30:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39841 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 10:30:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 38028 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37952 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37923 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 10:30:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:30:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FCB234C1EA for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6131 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Hong Tang Priority: Trivial Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: {code} {code} What should be: {code} {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-125-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 10:32:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42702 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 10:32:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 43002 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42975 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42935 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:32:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:32:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14778234C1F2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1585179252.1247049136083.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:32:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6131: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Attached patch made the minor changes to build.xml. No test necessary. > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-126-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 10:32:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42798 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 10:32:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 43277 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43239 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43182 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 10:32:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:32:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:32:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8B7234C1EB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1488414269.1247049135898.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6131: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6131.patch > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-127-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 11:12:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97912 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 11:12:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 11:12:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 88627 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 11:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88588 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 11:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88577 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 11:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8553234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <617180769.1247051534806.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5976) create script to provide classpath for external tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728630#action_12728630 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-5976: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #20 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/20/]) . Add a new command, classpath, to the hadoop script. Contributed by Owen O'Malley and Gary Murry > create script to provide classpath for external tools > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5976 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5976.patch, Hadoop-5976.patch > > > It would be useful for tools building on top of Hadoop to have a script that returns the class path that is needed to get all of the Hadoop jars and the needed libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-128-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 12:13:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13032 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 12:13:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 12:13:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 66651 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 12:13:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66601 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 12:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65875 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 12:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE33234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1288288922.1247055194828.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728647#action_12728647 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4493: ----------------------------------- One comment that came out of a Hemanth's discussion with Devaraj/Owen is w.r.t access of user files on the file system by the DistributedCache api on the TT. The user files will be assumed to be securely owned by the user and so TT has the onus to use the job's configuration and hence the user's identity to download files from the file system. > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: mapred, security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-129-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 13:11:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38229 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 13:11:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 13:11:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 50128 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:11:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50091 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50081 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 13:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D698B234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1682185659.1247058674877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728680#action_12728680 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6131: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412848/hadoop-6131.patch against trunk revision 791937. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/557/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/557/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/557/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/557/console This message is automatically generated. > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-130-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 13:13:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38686 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 13:13:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 13:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 50746 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:13:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50708 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 13:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50698 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 13:13:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B67234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <892459876.1247058794797.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6130) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner In-Reply-To: <2099190480.1247031854877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amar Kamat updated HADOOP-6130: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6130-v1.0.patch Attaching a patch the solves the issue which I could reproduce. Testing in progress. > ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown by KeyFieldBasedPartitioner > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6130 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6130 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Amar Kamat > Attachments: HADOOP-6130-v1.0.patch > > > KeyFieldBasedPartitioner throws "KeyFieldBasedPartitioner" when some part of the specified key is missing. > Scenario : > ======= > when value of num.key.fields.for.partition is greater than the separators provided in the input. > Command: > ======== > hadoop jar streaming.jar -Dmapred.reduce.tasks=3 -Dnum.key.fields.for.partition=5 -input -output -mapper org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityMapper -reducer org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.IdentityReducer -inputformat org.apache.hadoop.mapred.KeyValueTextInputFormat -partitioner org.apache.hadoop.mapred.lib.KeyFieldBasedPartitioner -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-131-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 18:43:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27593 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 18:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 18:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 75390 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 18:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75360 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 18:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75339 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 18:43:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:43:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:43:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62BF234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1507256274.1247078594799.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------- Attachment: ipcPing2.txt Thanks for the review Konstantin. I also attached a unit test. > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-132-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 18:45:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27887 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 18:45:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 18:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 77265 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77228 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77216 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8896234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <917190778.1247078714872.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-133-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 19:01:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47434 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 19:01:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 19:01:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9602 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 19:01:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9563 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 19:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9548 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 19:01:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:01:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:01:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250AF29A0011 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1000055472.1247079676150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728851#action_12728851 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6099: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412894/ipcPing2.txt against trunk revision 791937. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 260 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 258 warnings). -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/558/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/558/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/558/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/558/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/558/console This message is automatically generated. > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-134-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10750 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8092 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8055 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8045 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2825C234C052 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6132 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Reporter: Kan Zhang Assignee: Kan Zhang RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-135-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:31:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10805 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 8170 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8130 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8117 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A89234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1522632601.1247085075080.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728883#action_12728883 ] Mahadev konar commented on HADOOP-6131: --------------------------------------- +1 to the patch. the -1 from tests is because hudson is running create-c++-configure which isnt a target in common. {code} [exec] /home/hudson/tools/ant/latest/bin/ant -Dversion=791937_HADOOP-6131_PATCH-12412848 -DHadoopPatchProcess= -Dtest.junit.output.format=xml -Dtest.output=yes -Dcompile.c++=yes -Dforrest.home=/home/nigel/tools/forrest/latest -Djava5.home=/home/hudson/tools/java/latest1.5 create-c++-configure test-core {code} > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-136-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:33:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15324 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:33:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:33:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9602 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:33:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9559 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9540 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:33:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1557A234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1830982095.1247085195082.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:33:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728884#action_12728884 ] Mahadev konar commented on HADOOP-6131: --------------------------------------- +1 for the patch I meant... > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-137-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:35:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22551 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:35:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 12948 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12910 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12900 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:35:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FF5234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1768965523.1247085314801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Attachment: 1.patch attaching a patch. Manually verified that the client only opens one connection per protocol. > RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-138-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:35:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22644 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 13017 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12974 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12964 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41BE234C1E6 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1056526444.1247085314867.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Attachment: (was: 1.patch) > RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-139-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26794 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:37:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22153 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22115 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22105 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:37:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D16234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1702173255.1247085435271.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Attachment: 1.patch > RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-140-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26822 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:37:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 22219 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22179 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22161 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:37:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F17234C051 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2066560201.1247085435351.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-6131: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. thanks hong. > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-141-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28451 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:41:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:41:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29829 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:41:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29793 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29783 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:41:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A2429A0011 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <835576799.1247085674984.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728892#action_12728892 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------------ The core test failed beucase of this reason {quote} Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html [exec] /usr/bin/kill -9 22462 [exec] /usr/bin/xargs: /usr/bin/kill: No such file or directory [exec] /home/hudson/tools/ant/latest/bin/ant -Dversion=791937_HADOOP-6099_PATCH-12412894 -DHadoopPatchProcess= -Dtest.junit.output.format=xml -Dtest.output=yes -Dcompile.c++=yes -Dforrest.home=/home/nigel/tools/forrest/latest -Djava5.home=/home/hudson/tools/java/latest1.5 create-c++-configure test-core [exec] Buildfile: build.xml [exec] [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] Target "create-c++-configure" d {quote} Is this a problem with the HadoopQA framework? > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-142-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 20:47:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30479 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:47:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 20:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 39355 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:47:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39315 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 20:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39305 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 20:47:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:47:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8829234C052 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <731641136.1247086034885.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728895#action_12728895 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6132: --------------------------------------- Shouldn't the protocol be defined as: Class protocol; > RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-143-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 21:55:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97063 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 21:55:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 21:55:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 29690 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 21:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29649 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 21:55:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29639 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 21:55:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:55:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:55:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CCE234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <138984806.1247090114923.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Attachment: 2.patch Absolutely. An updated patch attached. > RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-144-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 21:57:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98111 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 21:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 21:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 32556 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 21:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32518 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 21:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32508 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 21:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B23234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <536187650.1247090235075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Summary: RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol (was: RPC client opens 2 connections per real protocol) > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-146-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2451 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 37638 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37599 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37536 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA9229A0018 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1827849174.1247090835055.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression In-Reply-To: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6133: -------------------------------- Attachment: Test.java > ReflectionUtils performance regression > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: Test.java > > > HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: > Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec > Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec > This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-145-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2481 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 37575 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37535 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37520 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4072234C1EB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ReflectionUtils performance regression -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6133 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Attachments: Test.java HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-147-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:13:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5558 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:13:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 46460 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46428 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46393 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE52F234C052 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1525938192.1247091194909.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression In-Reply-To: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6133: -------------------------------- Component/s: conf Affects Version/s: 0.20.0 > ReflectionUtils performance regression > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6133-0.20.patch, Test.java > > > HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: > Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec > Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec > This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-148-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:13:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5664 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 47296 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47265 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47248 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB703234C045 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10111321.1247091194897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression In-Reply-To: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6133: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6133-0.20.patch Here is one possible patch to fix this issue. The benchmark results in: ReflectionUtils on post-patch branch-0.20: ~18.1sec (still slower than 0.18.3 by about 2.5x but at least tolerable) This is not the most elegant fix, but the ClassLoader inside Configuration makes it slightly difficult to do this at a different layer. As for the importance of this - despite advice not to use ReflectionUtils in any hot path, there are cases when this happens. For example, MapWritable and GenericWritable do so for every deserialization. Outside libraries like Cascading also seem to not reuse objects in WritableDeserialization, and we have reports of some jobs spending nearly 100% CPU in Class.forName when profiled. This patch is against branch-0.20 but should also work post-split after the file rename. > ReflectionUtils performance regression > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6133-0.20.patch, Test.java > > > HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: > Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec > Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec > This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-149-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:25:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12250 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:25:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:25:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 62616 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:25:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62577 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:25:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62567 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:25:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD06234C045 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49150135.1247091915117.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:25:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression In-Reply-To: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728936#action_12728936 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6133: --------------------------------------- Have you tried just caching the JobConfigurable class in a static? That should substantially speed up the code rather than looking it up over and over again. > ReflectionUtils performance regression > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6133-0.20.patch, Test.java > > > HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: > Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec > Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec > This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-150-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 22:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14835 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 22:31:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 22:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66796 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66755 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 22:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66745 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 22:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CE8234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <577798293.1247092274798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6133) ReflectionUtils performance regression In-Reply-To: <1343704732.1247090834933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728941#action_12728941 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6133: ------------------------------------- Owen: the issue with that is that the JobConfigurable.class has to be loaded through Configuration's ClassLoader. In order to cache it in ReflectionUtils we'd need to have a Map CACHE_JOBCONFIGURABLE_CLASSES as well. Otherwise we risk having multiple instances of the JobConfigurable.class and checking isAssignableFrom against the wrong one. > ReflectionUtils performance regression > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6133-0.20.patch, Test.java > > > HADOOP-4187 introduced extra calls to Class.forName in ReflectionUtils.setConf. This caused a fairly large performance regression. Attached is a microbenchmark that shows the following timings (ms) for 100M constructions of new instances: > Explicit construction (new Test): around ~1.6sec > Using Test.class.newInstance: around ~2.6sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.18.3: ~8.0sec > ReflectionUtils on 0.20.0: ~200sec > This illustrates the ~80x slowdown caused by HADOOP-4187. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-151-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 23:31:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54791 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 23:31:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 21285 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21247 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21237 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:31:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1ACA234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1659559291.1247095875988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6134) New Hadoop Common Site MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org New Hadoop Common Site ---------------------- Key: HADOOP-6134 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: documentation Reporter: Corinne Chandel New Hadoop Common Site Set up site, initial pass. May need to add more content. May need to update some links. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-152-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 23:31:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54932 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 23:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22152 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22142 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 23:31:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:31:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1294029A0012 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <452911042.1247095876075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:31:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Zheng Shao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6135) Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6135 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6135 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: Zheng Shao Assignee: Zheng Shao The old code does not work if "hadoop/bin" is a symlink. In that case, "hadoop/bin/../conf" may not represent "hadoop/conf". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-153-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 08 23:35:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58884 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 23:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 23:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 25127 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25088 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25073 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 23:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:35:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7096234C1EB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70673565.1247096114945.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6069) Remove explicit dynamic loading of libz in native code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728964#action_12728964 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6069: --------------------------------------- This conflicts with the long-suffering HADOOP-4652, so I hesitate to commit it. What are the advantages? > Remove explicit dynamic loading of libz in native code > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6069 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6069 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6069-guts.txt, hadoop-6069.txt > > > The native zlib code currently uses dlopen/dlsym to dynamically load libz. This used to make sense when there was an lzo option (so you could load libhadoop for lzo purposes without requiring libz as well). Now that libhadoop only has zlib as an option, it makes sense to just add it as an ld flag and let it be automatically loaded as a shlib dependency. I also doubt that there are any distros where libz isn't required by the base system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-154-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68073 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 43016 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42978 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42967 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:07:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:07:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8646234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <693587578.1247098034813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6069) Remove explicit dynamic loading of libz in native code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728969#action_12728969 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6069: ------------------------------------- The advantage is a significant cleanup of both the autotools and source. I don't see any advantage to dynamically loading libz - zlib is installed on pretty much every Linux system I've ever seen. HADOOP-4652 also seems to depend on libz. If it needs to be updated so it doesn't conflict, I'm happy to do that. > Remove explicit dynamic loading of libz in native code > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6069 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6069 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6069-guts.txt, hadoop-6069.txt > > > The native zlib code currently uses dlopen/dlsym to dynamically load libz. This used to make sense when there was an lzo option (so you could load libhadoop for lzo purposes without requiring libz as well). Now that libhadoop only has zlib as an option, it makes sense to just add it as an ld flag and let it be automatically loaded as a shlib dependency. I also doubt that there are any distros where libz isn't required by the base system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-155-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:33:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 850 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:33:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 54141 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54099 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54089 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF87234C051 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <593562115.1247099594838.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6134) New Hadoop Common Site In-Reply-To: <1659559291.1247095875988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corinne Chandel updated HADOOP-6134: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch submitted. > New Hadoop Common Site > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Attachments: Hadoop-6134.patch > > > New Hadoop Common Site > Set up site, initial pass. > May need to add more content. > May need to update some links. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-156-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:33:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 906 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:33:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 54206 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54166 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54156 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:33:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:33:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1551234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1557801892.1247099594783.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6134) New Hadoop Common Site In-Reply-To: <1659559291.1247095875988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corinne Chandel updated HADOOP-6134: ------------------------------------ Attachment: Hadoop-6134.patch Patch for hadoop-6134. Apply this patch to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/site Note: No new test code requried; changes to documentation only. > New Hadoop Common Site > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Attachments: Hadoop-6134.patch > > > New Hadoop Common Site > Set up site, initial pass. > May need to add more content. > May need to update some links. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-157-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:38:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3131 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:38:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:38:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 84722 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84692 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84682 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25119234C044 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1288436321.1247099895150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6136) Hadoop TOP site MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop TOP site --------------- Key: HADOOP-6136 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: documentation Reporter: Corinne Chandel Priority: Minor Hadoop TOP site Modification to css styles (to match Hadoop common/hdfs/mapreduce sites). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-158-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:40:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3463 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85584 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85546 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85536 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E9234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <546372467.1247100014817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6136) Hadoop TOP site In-Reply-To: <1288436321.1247099895150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corinne Chandel updated HADOOP-6136: ------------------------------------ Attachment: Hadoop-6136.patch Patch for Hadoop-6136. Apply this patch to the hadoop TOP site: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/site Note: No new test code requried; changes to documentation only. > Hadoop TOP site > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6136 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Hadoop-6136.patch > > > Hadoop TOP site > Modification to css styles (to match Hadoop common/hdfs/mapreduce sites). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-159-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:40:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3507 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:40:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 85649 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85612 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85602 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:40:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:40:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF92234C045 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <147941098.1247100014900.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Corinne Chandel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6136) Hadoop TOP site In-Reply-To: <1288436321.1247099895150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Corinne Chandel updated HADOOP-6136: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch submitted. > Hadoop TOP site > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6136 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Hadoop-6136.patch > > > Hadoop TOP site > Modification to css styles (to match Hadoop common/hdfs/mapreduce sites). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-160-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:46:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6147 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:46:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 90235 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90197 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90183 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:46:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:46:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B65234C1EB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1445129373.1247100375874.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Zheng Shao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6135) Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory In-Reply-To: <452911042.1247095876075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zheng Shao updated HADOOP-6135: ------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.17.2 0.18.3 0.19.1 > Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6135 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.17.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.1, 0.20.0 > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: Zheng Shao > Attachments: HADOOP-6135.1.patch > > > The old code does not work if "hadoop/bin" is a symlink. In that case, "hadoop/bin/../conf" may not represent "hadoop/conf". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-161-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 00:46:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6214 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 00:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 90313 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90274 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90264 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 00:46:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:46:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:46:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22E1234C045 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <792719340.1247100375794.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Zheng Shao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6135) Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory In-Reply-To: <452911042.1247095876075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zheng Shao updated HADOOP-6135: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6135.1.patch This patch fixes the problem for hadoop-0.17/0.18/0.19/0.20. > Fix hadoop-config.sh to work with symlinked bin directory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6135 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.17.2, 0.18.3, 0.19.1, 0.20.0 > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: Zheng Shao > Attachments: HADOOP-6135.1.patch > > > The old code does not work if "hadoop/bin" is a symlink. In that case, "hadoop/bin/../conf" may not represent "hadoop/conf". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-162-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 01:46:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79071 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 01:46:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 01:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31792 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 01:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31767 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 01:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31757 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 01:46:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:46:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75FC234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <781131784.1247103974801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6134) New Hadoop Common Site In-Reply-To: <1659559291.1247095875988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728996#action_12728996 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6134: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412941/Hadoop-6134.patch against trunk revision 792302. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/559/console This message is automatically generated. > New Hadoop Common Site > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Attachments: Hadoop-6134.patch > > > New Hadoop Common Site > Set up site, initial pass. > May need to add more content. > May need to update some links. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-163-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 04:40:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25828 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 04:40:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 04:40:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 43669 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43629 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43619 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 04:40:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:40:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE6234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <353082398.1247114414972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6136) Hadoop TOP site In-Reply-To: <1288436321.1247099895150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729047#action_12729047 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6136: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412942/Hadoop-6136.patch against trunk revision 792302. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/560/console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop TOP site > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6136 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6136 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Hadoop-6136.patch > > > Hadoop TOP site > Modification to css styles (to match Hadoop common/hdfs/mapreduce sites). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-164-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 06:14:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40603 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 06:14:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 06:14:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 30980 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 06:14:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30939 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 06:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30921 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 06:14:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:14:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:14:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1153234C1EE for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:14:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org to fix project specific test-patch requirements ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6137 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan Priority: Critical only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-165-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 06:16:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49400 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 06:16:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 06:16:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 34890 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 06:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34856 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 06:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34832 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 06:16:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:16:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:16:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D9D234C004 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <334432598.1247120174800.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan reassigned HADOOP-6137: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-166-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 07:52:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90785 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 07:52:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 07:52:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 33677 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 07:52:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33638 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 07:52:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33628 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 07:52:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:52:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:52:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BB0234C004 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1935847253.1247125935070.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:52:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yongqiang He (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729083#action_12729083 ] Yongqiang He commented on HADOOP-5438: -------------------------------------- does these two problems be resolved? If not, i will open another jira and resolve it. > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Yongqiang He > Assignee: Yongqiang He > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-167-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 08:06:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94691 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 08:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 43324 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43287 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43273 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:06:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D900B234C1EE for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <767725942.1247126774888.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:06:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729091#action_12729091 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6137: -------------------------------------------- this patch cannot be tested using test-patch script as this patches the test-patch script itself. > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-168-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 08:06:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94755 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 08:06:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 43398 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43360 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43347 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 08:06:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BD3234C004 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1772322680.1247126774808.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:06:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6137: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6137.patch this patch lets the test-patch to call create-c++-configure target only for mapreduce > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-169-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 08:10:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95490 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 08:10:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 08:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 46327 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:10:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46289 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:10:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46279 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 08:10:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:10:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:10:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9828234C044 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <394630081.1247127014955.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6090) GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6090: ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed this. Thanks Amareshwari! > GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: benchmarks > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6090.txt > > > GridMix data generation scripts need to use the newer mapreduce api. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-170-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 08:12:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96388 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 08:12:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 08:12:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 51428 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51362 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 08:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51342 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 08:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56246234C48C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48227826.1247127135351.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 01:12:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-6137. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 I just committed this! > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-171-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:46:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93616 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:46:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:46:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 75140 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:46:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75112 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75059 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:46:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:46:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:46:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00854234C48C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <640317395.1247132775001.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:46:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729127#action_12729127 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4493: ----------------------------------- Talked with Milind offline, and he too agrees to the proposal of doing Case I first and Case II later. He adds that Case II nevertheless is useful and is on the long term wish-list. > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-172-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:52:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22841 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:52:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 85646 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:52:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85539 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:52:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85514 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:52:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:52:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:52:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D3E234C004 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1101670675.1247133134845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4493) Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729128#action_12729128 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4493: ----------------------------------- Created MAPREDUCE-744 for Case II. > Localized files from DistributedCache should have right access-control > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4493 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4493 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-173-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:57:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26532 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 90704 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90666 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90656 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A904234C1F2 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1256995069.1247133435107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6126) Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures In-Reply-To: <1085003647.1246879334924.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729132#action_12729132 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6126: -------------------------------------------- By looking at the example build #356; I could see that tests target never ran for this build for some reason. http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/356/console [exec] compile-mapred-test: [exec] [javac] Compiling 152 source files to /home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/trunk/build/test/mapred/classes [exec] [javac] /home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/trunk/src/test/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/FakeObjectUtilities.java:178: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype [exec] [javac] @Override [exec] [javac] ^ [exec] [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [exec] [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. [exec] [javac] 1 error [exec] [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] /home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/trunk/build.xml:470: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. [exec] [exec] Total time: 6 seconds [exec] Hence the no test results. The test-patch has a standard template for testreport urls. All it does is changes the build number. Except for this build #356, I could see test results for other builds. http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/362/testReport and to the latest builds. Please reopen if you see this issue again. Tnx > Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6126 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Jothi Padmanabhan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > The recent hadoopqa results on test patches do not seem to have the links to the actual tests that failed. > For example, http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/356/testReport/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-174-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 09:59:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27675 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 09:59:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 09:59:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 93628 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:59:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93578 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 09:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93384 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 09:59:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:59:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:59:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0653234C044 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <794298398.1247133554918.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6126) Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures In-Reply-To: <1085003647.1246879334924.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-6126. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > Hadoop QA mails on Patch tests do not have links to test failures > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6126 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6126 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Jothi Padmanabhan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > The recent hadoopqa results on test patches do not seem to have the links to the actual tests that failed. > For example, http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Mapreduce-Patch-vesta.apache.org/356/testReport/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-175-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 11:11:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32687 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 11:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 86273 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86157 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86011 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AB8234C48D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1638618452.1247137875071.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729185#action_12729185 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #21 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/21/]) . Fix project specific test-patch requirements > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-176-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 11:11:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32827 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 11:11:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 86975 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86939 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86924 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:11:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16841234C4A8 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2044651330.1247137875091.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6131) A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. In-Reply-To: <661438531.1247049014928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729186#action_12729186 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6131: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #21 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/21/]) . A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml (hong tang via mahadev) > A sysproperty should not be set unless the property is set on the ant command line in build.xml. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6131.patch > > > Patch for HADOOP-3315 contains an improper usage of setting a sysproperty. What it does now: > {code} > value="${io.compression.codec.lzo.class}"/> > {code} > What should be: > {code} > > > > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-177-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 15:22:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43542 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 15:22:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 15:22:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 99331 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 15:22:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99237 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 15:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99211 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 15:22:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:22:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:22:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB0729A001E for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <316321051.1247152934968.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729291#action_12729291 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #17 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/17/]) . Fix project specific test-patch requirements > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-178-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 17:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2702 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 17:41:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 17:41:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 84957 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:41:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84927 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84882 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 17:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:41:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FA229A0012 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1711861660.1247161274814.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Zhang updated HADOOP-6132: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-179-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 17:59:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11830 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 17:59:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 17:59:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 4129 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4086 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 17:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4075 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 17:59:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:59:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23D029A0011 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <853258378.1247162354847.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729356#action_12729356 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5438: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Yongqiang, I fixed HDFS-440. But the deprecated warnings are still there. It would be great if you can fix them. > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Yongqiang He > Assignee: Yongqiang He > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-180-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 18:16:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22518 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 18:16:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 18:16:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 25276 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25225 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25200 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 18:16:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:16:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:16:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF00B29A001F for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <45514930.1247163374978.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6125) extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) In-Reply-To: <682341596.1246484267288.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-6125: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) MAPREDUCE-711 moves the distributed cache to common, which makes separating the patch in MAPREDUCE-476 into two (this being one half of it) is no longer necessary. > extend DistributedCache to work locally (LocalJobRunner) (common half) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6125 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6125 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6125.patch > > > This is the co-ticket to MAPREDUCE-476, covering the significant part of DistributedCache that's in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-182-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 18:32:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43766 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 18:32:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 53890 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53809 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53794 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:32:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:32:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B2C29A0018 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <647266706.1247164334997.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yongqiang He (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729372#action_12729372 ] Yongqiang He commented on HADOOP-5438: -------------------------------------- np. Filed a jira HADOOP-6138. > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Yongqiang He > Assignee: Yongqiang He > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-181-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 18:32:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43760 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 18:32:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 53857 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53807 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53787 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 18:32:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:32:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:32:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5B129A0012 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:32:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yongqiang He (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6138 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Yongqiang He Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-183-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 21:22:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31480 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 21:22:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 21:22:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 92666 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 21:22:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92621 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 21:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92611 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 21:22:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:22:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:22:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C59929A0012 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1592736719.1247174535246.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-5170. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix I reverted this. Matei may move this into the Fair Share Scheduler. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-184-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 23:44:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14714 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 23:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 61825 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61788 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61778 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:44:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:44:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F097C29A0024 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1529884455.1247183054984.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-185-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 23:44:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14764 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 23:44:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 61908 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61866 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61848 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 23:44:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:44:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:44:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC23F29A0021 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1935500505.1247183054966.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Retry test > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-186-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 23:54:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17684 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 23:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 23:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 69390 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69354 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69344 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 23:54:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:54:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:54:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF1F29A0011 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2063384390.1247183654820.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:54:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley moved HDFS-478 to HADOOP-6139: -------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: hdfs client) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.1) 0.20.1 Key: HADOOP-6139 (was: HDFS-478) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-187-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 23:56:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20081 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 23:56:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 23:56:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 75096 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:56:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75057 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75047 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 23:56:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:56:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:56:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F84029A001B for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616154213.1247183775324.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729459#action_12729459 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------- I had the issue moved to Common rather than HDFS since the affected file is FsShell.java, within the Common subproject. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-188-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 09 23:58:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20330 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 23:58:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 23:58:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 75938 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75899 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75889 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:58:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C583429A0011 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1502464703.1247183894797.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6139: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) submitting patch. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-189-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 00:04:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24988 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 00:04:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 00:04:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 80443 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 00:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80406 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 00:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80396 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 00:04:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:04:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42DB29A001B for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <762001986.1247184254933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729464#action_12729464 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------- Ran unit tests locally. Passes all common unit tests. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-190-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 01:18:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57872 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 01:18:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 01:18:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 29405 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 01:18:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29367 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 01:18:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29357 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 01:18:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:18:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:18:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1C329A0011 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <202017664.1247188695056.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729486#action_12729486 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------- test-patch: {noformat} [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.{noformat} No unit tests because is documentation change. Manual step as documented in jira description. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-191-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 05:26:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29597 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 05:26:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 05:26:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 63888 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63851 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63841 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:26:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070B8234C004 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <634215241.1247203575014.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sreekanth Ramakrishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5771) Create unit test for LinuxTaskController MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sreekanth Ramakrishnan updated HADOOP-5771: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5771-ydist.patch Y! distribution patch. > Create unit test for LinuxTaskController > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5771 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5771 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5771-1.patch, HADOOP-5771-2.patch, HADOOP-5771-3.patch, HADOOP-5771-4.txt, HADOOP-5771-5.patch, hadoop-5771-ydist.patch > > > Add unit tests to test {{LinuxTaskController}} functionality introduced by HADOOP-4490 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-192-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 06:14:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51608 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 06:14:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 06:14:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 6631 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 06:14:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6594 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 06:14:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6584 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 06:14:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:14:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:14:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4BE29A001E for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1336714069.1247206455114.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:14:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729537#action_12729537 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------------ Hudson is stuck, so I ran the tests myself: {quote} run-test-core: [mkdir] Created dir: /mnt/vol/devrs004.snc1/dhruba/raincommon/build/test/data [mkdir] Created dir: /mnt/vol/devrs004.snc1/dhruba/raincommon/build/test/logs [copy] Copying 1 file to /mnt/vol/devrs004.snc1/dhruba/raincommon/build/test/extraconf [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.cli.TestCLI [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.095 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestConfiguration [junit] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.364 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestConfigurationSubclass [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.192 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestGetInstances [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.146 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.filecache.TestDistributedCache [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.39 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestBlockLocation [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.095 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestChecksumFileSystem [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.263 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestDFVariations [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.192 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestDU [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.125 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestGetFileBlockLocations [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.45 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestGlobExpander [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestLocalDirAllocator [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.158 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestLocalFileSystem [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.51 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestLocalFileSystemPermission [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.415 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestPath [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.03 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestTrash [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.511 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestTruncatedInputBug [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.256 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.kfs.TestKosmosFileSystem [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.348 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.permission.TestFsPermission [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.036 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestINode [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.019 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestInMemoryS3FileSystemContract [junit] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.621 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestS3Credentials [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.096 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestS3FileSystem [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.112 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.TestInMemoryNativeS3FileSystemContract [junit] Tests run: 35, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.655 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.http.TestGlobalFilter [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.704 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.http.TestServletFilter [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.729 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestArrayFile [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.057 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestArrayWritable [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.099 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestBloomMapFile [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.358 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestBytesWritable [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.081 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestDefaultStringifier [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.157 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestEnumSetWritable [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.093 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestGenericWritable [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.24 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestMD5Hash [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.03 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestMapFile [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.31 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestMapWritable [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.121 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSequenceFileSerialization [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.312 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSetFile [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.978 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestSortedMapWritable [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.107 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestText [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.569 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestTextNonUTF8 [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.019 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestUTF8 [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.097 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestVersionedWritable [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.028 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestWritable [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.027 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestWritableName [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.098 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.TestWritableUtils [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.667 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodecFactory [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.205 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFile [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.074 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.378 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileComparators [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.261 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileJClassComparatorByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.327 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileLzoCodecsByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.069 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileLzoCodecsStreams [junit] Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.08 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileNoneCodecsByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.154 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileNoneCodecsJClassComparatorByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.137 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileNoneCodecsStreams [junit] Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.36 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileSeek [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.536 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileSeqFileComparison [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 10.179 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileSplit [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.519 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileStreams [junit] Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.355 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestTFileUnsortedByteArrays [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.366 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile.TestVLong [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.749 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.retry.TestRetryProxy [junit] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.18 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.TestWritableSerialization [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.038 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 12.743 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPCServerResponder [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11.831 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestRPC [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 32.536 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.log.TestLogLevel [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.675 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.metrics.TestMetricsServlet [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.048 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.TestOutputRecord [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.017 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.net.TestDNS [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.156 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.net.TestScriptBasedMapping [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.388 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.net.TestSocketIOWithTimeout [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.032 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.record.TestBuffer [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.record.TestRecordIO [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.073 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.record.TestRecordVersioning [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.052 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.security.TestAccessControlList [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.019 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.security.TestAccessToken [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.54 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUnixUserGroupInformation [junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.279 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.security.authorize.TestConfiguredPolicy [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.18 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestCyclicIteration [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.021 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestGenericsUtil [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.116 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestIndexedSort [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.716 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestProcfsBasedProcessTree [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.54 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestShell [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.13 sec [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.util.TestStringUtils [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 265 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 263 warnings {quote} > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-193-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 06:20:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60645 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 06:20:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 06:20:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9764 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 06:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9726 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 06:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9715 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 06:20:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C775F234C004 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1862263160.1247206814802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6099: ------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-194-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 07:35:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92687 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 07:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 83160 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 07:35:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83122 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 07:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83099 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 07:35:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CC1234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <149324871.1247211314802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729558#action_12729558 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6132: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412921/2.patch against trunk revision 792812. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/561/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/561/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/561/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/561/console This message is automatically generated. > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-195-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 11:59:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13008 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 11:59:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 11:59:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 10300 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 11:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10258 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 11:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10243 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 11:59:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:59:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F2F234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1433088142.1247227154849.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5436) job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729617#action_12729617 ] Amar Kamat commented on HADOOP-5436: ------------------------------------ Tim, HADOOP-4372 removes the job-dir searching for new jobs and MAPREDUCE-416 moves completed jobs to *done* folder hence keeping the job-history folder clean. MAPREDUCE-416 also introduced file-cache that caches the filenames that were used and hence makes the job-completion for recovered jobs faster. MAPREDUCE-11 intends to remove the searching completely. Still the locking is still an issue. Hopefully we will fix it sometime soon. MR doesnt depend on the files in the *done* folder and hence the *done* folder can be archived/cleanedup etc while the jobtracker is running. > job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Tim Williamson > Attachments: HADOOP-5436.patch > > > An unpleasant surprise upgrading to 0.19: requests to jobtracker.jsp would take a long time or even time out whenever new jobs where submitted. Investigation showed the call to JobInProgress.initTasks() was calling JobHistory.JobInfo.logSubmitted() which in turn was calling JobHistory.getJobHistoryFileName() which was pegging the CPU for a couple minutes. Further investigation showed the were 200,000+ files in the job history folder -- and every submission was creating a FileStatus for them all, then applying a regular expression to just the name. All this just on the off chance the job tracker had been restarted (see HADOOP-3245). To make matters worse, these files cannot be safely deleted while the job tracker is running, as the disappearance of a history file at the wrong time causes a FileNotFoundException. > So to summarize the issues: > - having Hadoop default to storing all the history files in a single directory is a Bad Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission is a Worse Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission while holding a lock on the JobInProgress object and thereby blocking the jobtracker.jsp from rendering is a Terrible Idea (note: haven't confirmed this, but a cursory glance suggests that's what's going on) > - not being able to clean up the mess without taking down the job tracker is just Unfortunate -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-196-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 12:27:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65264 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 12:27:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 12:27:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 48690 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 12:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48656 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 12:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48646 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 12:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:27:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D16234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <996856429.1247228834807.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729620#action_12729620 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6099: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412894/ipcPing2.txt against trunk revision 792812. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/562/console This message is automatically generated. > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-197-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 14:35:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91067 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 14:35:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 53815 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53757 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53746 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:35:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323C7234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1699381653.1247236515194.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729650#action_12729650 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-5170: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #22 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/22/]) . Removed change log entry because was reverted from mapreduce. > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-198-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 14:35:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91177 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 14:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 54213 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54179 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54169 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 14:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:35:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBF4234C4B6 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <806891496.1247236515456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6099) Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729651#action_12729651 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6099: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #22 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/22/]) . The RPC module can be configured to not send period pings. The default behaviour remains unchanged. (dhruba) > Allow configuring the IPC module to send pings > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6099 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6099 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: ipcPing.txt, ipcPing2.txt > > > The IPC Client sets a socketTimeout for the time period specified by the pingInterval and then sends a ping every pingInterval. This means that if a RPC server does not respond to a RPC client, then the RPC client blocks forever. This is a problem for applications that wants to switch quickly from one un-responsive HDFS cluster to a good one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-199-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 16:09:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46016 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 16:09:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 16:09:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 39318 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 16:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39299 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 16:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39289 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 16:09:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:09:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC373234C044 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <221985591.1247242154831.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729696#action_12729696 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6139: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413065/HADOOP-478-v20.patch against trunk revision 792812. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/563/console This message is automatically generated. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-200-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:11:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67496 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:11:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 47976 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47792 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47765 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B445234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1393504557.1247245875035.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-201-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:11:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67509 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:11:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 48003 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47904 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47768 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A70A234C1EE for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6140) addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.18.3 Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich Priority: Minor addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. This method didn't work. Bug 1: addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. Suggested solution: use "," instead of Bug 2: in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. It compares if (archives[i].getPath().equals( archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ instead of if (archives[i].toString().equals( archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-202-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:13:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68351 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 51539 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51509 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51499 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C2A234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1593619452.1247245994817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6140.patch This patch should fix this bug. > addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-203-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:35:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81572 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:35:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 88161 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88131 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88121 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:35:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:35:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE933234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1479294126.1247247314831.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6124: ------------------------------------------- Priority: Critical (was: Major) Hope this can be fixed soon. Otherwise, patches with javac warnings may get in without being noticed. Changed the priority to "critical". > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-204-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:37:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82386 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 88725 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88687 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88677 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:37:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B3C234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1522348079.1247247434811.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Priority: Major (was: Minor) Summary: DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch (was: addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-205-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:37:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82444 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 17:37:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 88805 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88763 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88753 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 17:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F8C234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <572861873.1247247434887.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Tags: DistributedCache > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-206-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 18:45:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25830 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 18:45:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 18:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 95458 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95411 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95396 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 18:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1389C234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <237212183.1247251515075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yuri Pradkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729764#action_12729764 ] Yuri Pradkin commented on HADOOP-4012: -------------------------------------- Abdul, I think at this point it's OK to assume that Chris has accepted your explanation. Can you please post your latest patch with all the fixes. Beware that repository has changed: you'll need to do switch to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk/ or checkout a fresh copy and reapply your patch. Guys, can we please wrap this up? It's taking way too long for this patch to make it. Please. Thanks. > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-207-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 19:09:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38000 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 19:09:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 19:09:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 44277 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44173 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44163 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 19:09:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:09:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC0A234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2112632214.1247252954885.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729776#action_12729776 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------- Hudson tried to apply v20 patch, which is why I ran test-patch manually. Both pathces apply fine. Patch is ready to be committed. > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-208-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 19:51:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54621 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 19:51:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 19:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 96385 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:51:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96343 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 19:51:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96333 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 19:51:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:51:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:51:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C9F234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1150437269.1247255474795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-209-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 20:29:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66248 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 20:29:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 20:29:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 32868 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32831 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32821 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:29:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:29:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9908234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <566346492.1247257754876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729801#action_12729801 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-4012: --------------------------------------- -1 to changing LineRecordReader. In particular, you've undone changes that were made by other jiras. This is very very touchy code that the current version of this patch breaks. I really think that this is better done by using a separate BzipTextInputFormat and BzipLineRecordReader. > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-210-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 20:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67013 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 20:31:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 20:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 39148 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39113 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39103 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:31:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2988234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <640352979.1247257874829.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6139) Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6139: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 0.20.1 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Jakob! > Incomplete help message is displayed for rm and rmr options. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.1, 0.21.0 > > Attachments: COMMON-478.patch, HADOOP-478-v20.patch > > > If path/src is missing from rm or rmr option then help message is displayed for these options. > On giving command "hadoop dfs -rm" > help message displayed is "Usage: java FsShell [-rm ]" > while it should be "Usage: java FsShell [-rm [-skipTrash] ]" > Same issue is there with rmr option also. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-211-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 20:51:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70369 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 20:51:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 20:51:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 66947 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:51:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66907 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66897 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 20:51:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:51:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:51:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCFA234C1F1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2029229069.1247259074973.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729812#action_12729812 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------------- Vladimir, Patch looks good. It would be nice to have a test for (2). It may also be appropriate to add an exception if someone passes in a filename with a comma. -- Philip > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-212-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 20:53:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70779 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 20:53:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 20:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 70162 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70122 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70112 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 20:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3291234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1605722789.1247259194798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729813#action_12729813 ] Vladimir Klimontovich commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------------------- Ok, will make the test. > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-213-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 20:57:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71555 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 20:57:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 20:57:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 77461 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77424 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 20:57:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77414 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 20:57:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:57:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAD7234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <912077286.1247259434960.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Yuri Pradkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729814#action_12729814 ] Yuri Pradkin commented on HADOOP-4012: -------------------------------------- bq. -1 to changing LineRecordReader. In particular, you've undone changes that were made by other jiras. This is very very touchy code that the current version of this patch breaks. Can you please be more specific: what changes were undone? Can you please elaborate on what exactly this patch breaks (perhaps we need more tests?)? The code indeed is very heavily used, but I think it's also very well beaten upon by various tests. bq. I really think that this is better done by using a separate BzipTextInputFormat and BzipLineRecordReader. I think the point of having splitting built in - is that all readers/formats can avoid re-implementing common things. We are currently using a binary format reader that works just fine with this patch with only minor changes. Moreover, the idea is to work out a common framework where other block-compressed formats could be processed in a similar manner. The alternative that you're suggesting is to have BzipTextInputFormat, XXXBlockCompressInputFormat, YYYBlockCompressInputFormat, and so on. > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-214-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 21:27:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80285 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 21:27:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 21:27:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2098 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 21:27:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2055 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 21:27:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1935 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 21:27:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:27:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE62234C1EB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <995656697.1247261235436.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729826#action_12729826 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-4012: --------------------------------------- {quote} Can you please be more specific: what changes were undone? {quote} It was the feature from HADOOP-3144 that was dropped by mistake. But that is just indicative of the problem. LineRecordReader is very delicate code that is very easy to break. Changes to this code are hard to verify and it is used by many many Hadoop applications. {quote} I think the point of having splitting built in - is that all readers/formats can avoid re-implementing common things. {quote} This patch only seems to support TextInputFormat and Bzip. I don't see abstractions that would make this portable to other codecs or input formats. Maybe combining your binary format with BzipTextInputFormat makes sense? For binary files, SequenceFiles is already splittable with bzip and *no* changes. > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-215-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:23:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8913 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:23:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 57655 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57550 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57473 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AE6234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <965264797.1247264595009.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729866#action_12729866 ] Vladimir Klimontovich commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------------------- Philip, I tried to create junit test for (2), but I met some difficulties. Seems that I need to start whole cluster from junit test (jobtracker, tasktracker) to test running job with additional classpath in distributed cache. I'm not familiar with hadoop code, but maybe you or someone could point to the test that I could use as example. Or there is another option. I can extract piece of code with bug to separate method and test it separately. But I'm not sure it's reasonable to in in 0.18 branch. Also, I noticed that a comma bug is already fixed in trunk. > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-216-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:23:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8929 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:23:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 59303 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59276 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59246 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:23:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:23:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182F5234C1EF for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6141 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: Hong Tang Assignee: Hong Tang There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): {code} java5.check: BUILD FAILED /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. {code} - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-217-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:25:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9696 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:25:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66841 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:25:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66804 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66794 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:25:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:25:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49DA234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <715841804.1247264714801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch This patch contains unit-test for (1) and it validates if path to classpath entry contains CLASSPATH_ARCHIVES_SEPARATOR (",") > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch, HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-218-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:35:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15274 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:35:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 84640 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84603 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84593 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B3234C044 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1068131679.1247265314859.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729870#action_12729870 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------------- One creates clusters in unit tests using MiniMRCluster, but that's too heavy-weight: I think it's ok to extract the relevant function and test it via unit test. +1 to the tests for (1). -- Philip > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch, HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-219-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:39:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15997 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:39:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:39:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 89761 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:39:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89640 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:39:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89630 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:39:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:39:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E20234C48D for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <436012761.1247265555019.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken In-Reply-To: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729874#action_12729874 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6141: ----------------------------------- Note that the problems in test-patch.sh seem to be fixed in trunk, but interestingly it is not backported to 0.20. > hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > > There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): > - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): > {code} > java5.check: > BUILD FAILED > /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. > {code} > - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-220-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16991 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 513 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 472 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 462 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9E2234C1EE for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org archives relative path changes in common. ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6142 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mahadev konar Assignee: Mahadev konar Fix For: 0.21.0 HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-221-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17404 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2621 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2584 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2574 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C1B234C1EE for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1899768008.1247266155289.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. In-Reply-To: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-6142: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > archives relative path changes in common. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mahadev konar > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6142.patch > > > HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-222-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 22:49:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17465 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 22:49:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 2707 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2665 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2655 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 22:49:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:49:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:49:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BB3234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1926544142.1247266155276.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:49:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. In-Reply-To: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-6142: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6142.patch > archives relative path changes in common. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mahadev konar > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6142.patch > > > HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-223-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 23:25:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23282 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 23:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 24423 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24380 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24370 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:25:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5F2234C046 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1081341136.1247268314893.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken In-Reply-To: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6141: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.20.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Added java5.home and forrest.home definitions to all ant commands. Added curly braces for ${10} (JAVA5_HOME). > hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6141.patch > > > There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): > - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): > {code} > java5.check: > BUILD FAILED > /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. > {code} > - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-224-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 23:25:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23331 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 23:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 24489 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24444 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24434 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 23:25:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:25:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F81234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <906552672.1247268314804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken In-Reply-To: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6141: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6141.patch > hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6141.patch > > > There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): > - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): > {code} > java5.check: > BUILD FAILED > /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. > {code} > - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-225-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 23:31:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23951 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 23:31:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 23:31:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27197 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27160 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27150 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 23:31:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:31:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B0F234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <999576098.1247268675032.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken In-Reply-To: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729888#action_12729888 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6141: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6141.patch > > > There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): > - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): > {code} > java5.check: > BUILD FAILED > /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. > {code} > - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-226-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 23:35:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24438 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 23:35:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 23:35:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 27991 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27953 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27943 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 23:35:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:35:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90B3234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <855287160.1247268914810.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4074) releaseaudit target must be re-written so that the rat jar file isn't in the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729889#action_12729889 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-4074: ------------------------------------------------ What should we do for the following comments found in 0.20 test-patch.sh? {code} ### DISABLE RELEASE AUDIT UNTIL HADOOP-4074 IS FIXED ### Do not call releaseaudit when run by a developer ### if [[ $HUDSON == "true" ]] ; then ### echo "$ANT_HOME/bin/ant -Dversion="${VERSION}" -DHadoopPatchProcess= releaseaudit > $PATCH_DIR/trunkReleaseAuditWarnings.txt 2>&1" ### $ANT_HOME/bin/ant -Dversion="${VERSION}" -DHadoopPatchProcess= releaseaudit > $PATCH_DIR/trunkReleaseAuditWarnings.txt 2>&1 ### fi {code} > releaseaudit target must be re-written so that the rat jar file isn't in the classpath > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4074 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4074 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Nigel Daley > > The nightly build and the Hudson patch testing process copies the rat-0.5.1.jar into the hadoop lib directory so that the releaseaudit target works. This puts it in the general classpath. Since Hive was committed, this jar file contains older versions of classes needed by Hive. This rat jar file should be put elsewhere or configured in another way so that it doesn't need to be in the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-227-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 10 23:39:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24748 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2009 23:39:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2009 23:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31334 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31296 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31286 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8F9234C044 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6143 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Reporter: Ravi Phulari HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that {noformat} Exit Code: Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. {noformat} Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. {code} statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 cp: File does not exist: foo statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 copyToLocal: null statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? 255 {code} In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-228-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:01:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28447 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:01:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:01:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 44018 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:01:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43976 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43966 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:01:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:01:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:01:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66B3234C046 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <546024233.1247270474877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729900#action_12729900 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413164/HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch against trunk revision 793098. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/564/console This message is automatically generated. > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch, HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-229-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:17:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31627 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:17:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:17:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 56733 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:17:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56696 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:17:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56674 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:17:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:17:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:17:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF172234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1140007707.1247271434912.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:17:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alok Singh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6144) streaming doesn't support jobclient.output.filter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org streaming doesn't support jobclient.output.filter ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6144 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6144 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Environment: Linux Reporter: Alok Singh the streaming Jobclient implementation i.e contrib/streaming/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/streaming/StreamJob.java is significantly different than the core hadoop mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobClient.java. for example unlike StreamJob.java, JobClient.java it gets tasks log when jobclient.output.filter=ALL is specified . With hod-logs going away in hadoop 0.20 (due to new scheduler) user has no good way of programmitically getting logs We should have intermediate adaptor class to implement Tools for the purpose of submitting jobs via m/r, streaming, pipes so that we don't miss some core functionality. GenericJobClient implements Tools and then StreamJob extends GenericJobClient, JobClient extends GenericJobClient Alok -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-230-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:23:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39657 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:23:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:23:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 61658 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:23:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61616 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:23:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61606 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:23:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:23:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75C4234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1548582403.1247271794802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6141) hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken In-Reply-To: <982828317.1247264595098.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6141: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.0) 0.20.1 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this to 0.20 only. Thanks, Hong! > hadoop 0.20 branch "test-patch" is broken > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6141 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.20.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-6141.patch > > > There were two problems found in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh while I am doing the backporting of TFile patch (HADOOP-3315): > - java5.home and forrest.home is not defined for the ant command in pre-build stage, which leads to the following error message (in file trunkJavacWarnings.txt): > {code} > java5.check: > BUILD FAILED > /home/htang/workspace/test-patch/branch-0.20/build.xml:891: 'java5.home' is not defined. Forrest requires Java 5. Please pass -Djava5.home= to Ant on the command-line. > {code} > - When referring 10-th argument from the command line, it should use "${10}" instead of "$10" (which is $1 with a zero appended). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-231-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:25:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40302 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:25:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 63113 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:25:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63073 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63057 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:25:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:25:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A98234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1365437642.1247271914802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch contains patch with junit-test for (2) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch, HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch, HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-232-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42090 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:31:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66508 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66468 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66458 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D080234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2017781583.1247272275249.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3315) New binary file format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-3315: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-3315-0710-1-hadoop-20.patch Patch to hadoop 0.20. Also included the minor fix in HADOOP-6131. > New binary file format > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3315 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-3315-0507.patch, hadoop-3315-0509-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0509.patch, hadoop-3315-0513.patch, hadoop-3315-0514.patch, hadoop-3315-0601.patch, hadoop-3315-0602.patch, hadoop-3315-0605.patch, hadoop-3315-0612.patch, hadoop-3315-0623-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0701-yhadoop-20.patch, hadoop-3315-0710-1-hadoop-20.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080908_TFILE_PREVIEW_WITH_LZO_TESTS.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080915_TFILE.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, TFile Specification 20081217.pdf > > > SequenceFile's block compression format is too complex and requires 4 codecs to compress or decompress. It would be good to have a file format that only needs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-233-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:31:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42155 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 66588 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66548 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66538 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F91234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2012874597.1247272274935.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan moved HDFS-479 to HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: hdfs client) fs Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.1) 0.20.1 Key: HADOOP-6145 (was: HDFS-479) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-234-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:31:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42218 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 66661 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66623 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66613 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD97E234C4CC for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2046448094.1247272275906.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729912#action_12729912 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------- Moved to Common as bug was tracked to FsShell, which is in Common. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-235-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:33:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42573 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:33:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:33:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 67484 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:33:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67446 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67436 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:33:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:33:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00356234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1425638920.1247272396000.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:33:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3315) New binary file format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729914#action_12729914 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-3315: ----------------------------------- ant test and test-patch passed (after applying patch to test-patch.sh from HADOOP-6141). [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 63 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity. > New binary file format > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3315 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-3315-0507.patch, hadoop-3315-0509-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0509.patch, hadoop-3315-0513.patch, hadoop-3315-0514.patch, hadoop-3315-0601.patch, hadoop-3315-0602.patch, hadoop-3315-0605.patch, hadoop-3315-0612.patch, hadoop-3315-0623-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0701-yhadoop-20.patch, hadoop-3315-0710-1-hadoop-20.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080908_TFILE_PREVIEW_WITH_LZO_TESTS.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080915_TFILE.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, TFile Specification 20081217.pdf > > > SequenceFile's block compression format is too complex and requires 4 codecs to compress or decompress. It would be good to have a file format that only needs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-236-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:51:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45923 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:51:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 76670 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:51:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76630 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:51:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76620 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:51:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:51:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:51:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9137234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <791042932.1247273474940.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729915#action_12729915 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6143: ------------------------------------- -1 exit code is equivalent to 255 exit code on Linux - exit codes are a single byte and range from 0-255. See http://www.faqs.org/docs/abs/HTML/exit-status.html > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-237-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 00:53:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46157 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 00:53:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 00:53:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 77865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77825 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 00:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77813 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 00:53:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:53:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D3A234C1EB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <254127384.1247273594920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-6143. --------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Assignee: Todd Lipcon Resolving as invalid. Please reopen if you disagree. > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-238-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 01:03:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49533 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 01:03:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 01:03:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 82520 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:03:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82483 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82473 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 01:03:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:03:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C6C234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1791891147.1247274194796.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6145.patch Attaching patch for v20 > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-239-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 01:05:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50093 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 01:05:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 01:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 82974 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82936 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82883 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 01:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:05:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9F4234C4B3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1627837515.1247274315050.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:05:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Attachment: COMMON-6145.patch Attaching patch for trunk. Problem was the trash method was throwing FileNotFound, which was not being handled. There are three different places where the non-existence of the file being deleted could conceivably be handled. Fixed by just checking for the file's existence at the beginning and exiting if not found. No unit test because the affected unit test is TestHDFSCLI, which is in HDFS project. Manually tested and it works. The reason this wasn't detected previously is that it only manifests itself when the trash feature is enabled, which apparently it isn't on the minidfscluster that powers TestCLI. We should probably looking at running Test*CLI with both trash on and trash off. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-240-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 01:07:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50809 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 01:07:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 01:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85827 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85817 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 01:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C1A234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1624791477.1247274434791.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) submitting patch. Hudson should pick up the correct one. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-241-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 01:23:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54890 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 01:23:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 96630 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96593 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96582 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:23:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC58234C052 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1688789528.1247275394977.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3315) New binary file format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-3315: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) 0.20.1 Committed to 0.20 branch > New binary file format > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3315 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3315 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Hong Tang > Fix For: 0.20.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-3315-0507.patch, hadoop-3315-0509-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0509.patch, hadoop-3315-0513.patch, hadoop-3315-0514.patch, hadoop-3315-0601.patch, hadoop-3315-0602.patch, hadoop-3315-0605.patch, hadoop-3315-0612.patch, hadoop-3315-0623-2.patch, hadoop-3315-0701-yhadoop-20.patch, hadoop-3315-0710-1-hadoop-20.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080908_TFILE_PREVIEW_WITH_LZO_TESTS.patch, HADOOP-3315_20080915_TFILE.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, hadoop-trunk-tfile.patch, TFile Specification 20081217.pdf > > > SequenceFile's block compression format is too complex and requires 4 codecs to compress or decompress. It would be good to have a file format that only needs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-242-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 01:23:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54957 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 01:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 96708 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96670 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96660 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 01:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2805234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1773117517.1247275394913.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729927#action_12729927 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------- also, the trunk patch has a quick fix to bring the rm documentation in line with what was committed in HADOOP-6139. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-243-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 02:05:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74269 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 02:05:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 02:05:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23095 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23050 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23032 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 02:05:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:05:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:05:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B7234C044 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1485403267.1247277914859.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari reopened HADOOP-6143: ---------------------------------- As I wrote in the above description HDFS shell guide misleads to user that exit code -1 is returned on error. ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) Either we should return exact exit value equal to -1 on error or we should correct documentation as "exit code returns non zero value on error" OS X manual for CP command explicitly mentions that "cp utility exits >0 if an error occurs" {code} statepick-lm:hadoop-hdfs rphulari$ man cp | grep exit is displayed and the exit value is not altered. The cp utility exits 0 on success, and >0 if an error occurs. {code} > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-244-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 02:27:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82804 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 02:27:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 02:27:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28779 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28741 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28731 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86B8234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1623762892.1247279234805.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729937#action_12729937 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6143: ------------------------------------- {code} todd@todd-laptop:/tmp$ cat Test.java public class Test { public static void main(String []args) { System.exit(-1); } } todd@todd-laptop:/tmp$ javac Test.java todd@todd-laptop:/tmp$ java -cp . Test ; echo $? 255 {code} It's possible this might actually return -1 on some other OS though (does Windows have a concept of an exit code? I think maybe?). Changing the docs to say "nonzero" vs "zero" instead of -1 vs 0 does make sense, though. > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-245-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 02:31:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84288 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 02:31:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 02:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29164 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29122 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 02:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29105 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 02:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADCF234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <743723373.1247279474816.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729938#action_12729938 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6143: ------------------------------------- bq. we should correct documentation as "exit code returns non zero value on error" +1 > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-246-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 03:01:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94775 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 03:01:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 03:01:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 54429 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:01:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54391 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54381 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 03:01:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:01:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:01:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A64234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <374264735.1247281274810.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729940#action_12729940 ] Ravi Phulari commented on HADOOP-6143: -------------------------------------- +1 For changing the docs . > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-247-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 03:47:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11987 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 03:47:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 03:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 82793 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:47:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82756 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82746 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 03:47:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:47:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5090234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1522680834.1247284034793.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. In-Reply-To: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729944#action_12729944 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6142: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413166/HADOOP-6142.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/565/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/565/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/565/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/565/console This message is automatically generated. > archives relative path changes in common. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mahadev konar > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6142.patch > > > HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-248-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 03:51:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12236 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 03:51:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 03:51:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 83222 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:51:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83184 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83174 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 03:51:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:51:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:51:42 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F4D234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1174100427.1247284280261.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:51:20 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6143: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6143.patch Attaching patch . > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: HADOOP-6143.patch > > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-249-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 03:55:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12781 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 03:55:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 03:55:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 84759 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84721 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 03:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84709 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 03:55:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:55:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:55:41 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E8A234C004 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2033331204.1247284520044.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:55:20 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6143: --------------------------------- Assignee: Ravi Phulari (was: Todd Lipcon) Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) This patch consists of only documentation changes . Compiled ant docs and verified HTML docs . No Tests included . > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Attachments: HADOOP-6143.patch > > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-250-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 11 10:18:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81631 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2009 10:18:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2009 10:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 15923 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 10:18:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15885 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2009 10:18:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15875 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2009 10:18:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:18:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:18:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0616234C004 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <821632605.1247307494839.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Abdul Qadeer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12729967#action_12729967 ] Abdul Qadeer commented on HADOOP-4012: -------------------------------------- I totally agree with Owen that LineRecordReader (LRR) is a heavily used code in Hadoop and changes to such a code should be very carefully done. But that doesn't mean that, LRR code is closed for any improvements and feature enhancements. This LRR deals with Text data and Hadoop uses it as a default because probably Text is the most frequently used kind on input. I think same is true for BZip2 compressed files. If not all, most of them are Text compressed data. This patch provides the following feature to the end user. User puts his BZip2 compressed text files in an input directory and submits the Hadoop job. Soon he gets the result in the output directory. That is it! He hadn't had to write or mention any input format any record reader And all this happens using full cluster CPU power (due to BZip2 splitting). Also our algorithm doesn't demand any specific kind of splits from Hadoop. It works with whatever splits provided to it. ............................................................................. Now comes the correctness of LRR code. testFormat() test case in org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TestTextInputFormat is a very stringent test case to ensure the correctness of LRR. And since this test case is frequently run whenever someone submits and tests a patch, so I dont think that any correctness problem in LRR can escape. Now comes the things like HADOOP-3114. That was my mistake as mentioned by Chris also in his comments. I have corrected that and will upload the new patch soon after running the tests locally. I think these are the places where the vision and knowledge of Hadoop commmiters comes handy. If you see that other than HADOOP-3114, I have missed something else, please tell me that and I will fix it. Additionally Hadoop has a very active user community and any latent bug in the code (especially the one used heavily) can not hide for long. Also the serious businesses using Hadoop usually use only the stable version (e.g I think Yahoo yet uses 0.18? while 0.20 is out). So I see a safe transition to the changed LRR code. ........................................................ Now comes the point of making a new BZip2 specific input format / record reader. If we make a separate reader for BZip2 e.g BZip2LineRecordReader, in that class most of the code will be the replica of LRR. And doing that way, GZip support should also come out of LRR and there will be a GZipLineRecordReader, again mostly the code a replica of LRR. Whenever there comes a new codec in Hadoop we will make a new reader whose 99% code is the replica of LRR. So in my view it makes more sense to handle Line related text (be it plain or compressed) in LRR. When we were adding splitting support for BZip2, we felt that there might be situations when codecs want to change/manipulate the split start or end. So we added support for that. Similarly instead LRR counting read bytes itself, it now asks the stream about the position. This feature makes it possible for a codec to manipulate indirectly that how long a reader should keep on reading. We think these features can help for other block based codecs to do splitting easily without further changes in LRR. .............................................................. So in summary this patch might need relatively stringent reviewing by the committers due to its heavy usage but it does add useful functionality in a seamless way for the end user. > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-251-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 13:37:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10052 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 13:37:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 13:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 719 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 681 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 671 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 13:37:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:37:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC667234C053 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1894238801.1247405834901.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730083#action_12730083 ] Vladimir Klimontovich commented on HADOOP-6140: ----------------------------------------------- The same fix, but in trunk (0.21): MAPREDUCE-752 > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch, HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch, HADOOP-6140.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-252-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 13:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13567 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 13:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 6759 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6717 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6707 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C782234C1EB for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1675423876.1247406435181.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-253-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 13:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13627 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6826 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6785 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6775 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3915D234C4AC for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <76337531.1247406435233.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6140.patch) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-254-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 13:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13635 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6893 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6849 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6822 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3250C234C48D for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462055843.1247406435205.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6140-ver2.patch) > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-255-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 13:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13648 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 13:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6951 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6913 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6897 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CAE234C052 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <31200023.1247406435149.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Klimontovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Klimontovich updated HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch is a enhancement of HADOOP-6140-ver3.patch: it extracts comparison statement to separate method and improves junit-tests > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-256-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 15:57:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69605 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 15:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 71510 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71472 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71462 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978A8234C4B9 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1012480694.1247414235619.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6137) to fix project specific test-patch requirements In-Reply-To: <2044264383.1247120054920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730102#action_12730102 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #20 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/20/]) > to fix project specific test-patch requirements > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6137.patch > > > only mapreduce project needs create-c++-configure target which needs to be executed as part to the test-core ant target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-257-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 15:57:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69652 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 71613 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71551 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71529 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5FE234C004 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <313832992.1247414235049.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6090) GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730099#action_12730099 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6090: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #20 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/20/]) > GridMix is broke after upgrading random(text)writer to newer mapreduce apis > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: benchmarks > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6090.txt > > > GridMix data generation scripts need to use the newer mapreduce api. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-258-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 12 15:57:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69673 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 15:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 71636 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71553 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71540 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2009 15:57:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:57:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332D6234C053 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1226707272.1247414235208.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5170) Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730100#action_12730100 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-5170: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #20 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/20/]) > Set max map/reduce tasks on a per-job basis, either per-node or cluster-wide > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Gray > Assignee: Matei Zaharia > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: h5170.patch, HADOOP-5170-tasklimits-v3-0.18.3.patch, tasklimits-v2.patch, tasklimits-v3-0.19.patch, tasklimits-v3.patch, tasklimits-v4-20.patch, tasklimits-v4.patch, tasklimits.patch > > > There are a number of use cases for being able to do this. The focus of this jira should be on finding what would be the simplest to implement that would satisfy the most use cases. > This could be implemented as either a per-node maximum or a cluster-wide maximum. It seems that for most uses, the former is preferable however either would fulfill the requirements of this jira. > Some of the reasons for allowing this feature (mine and from others on list): > - I have some very large CPU-bound jobs. I am forced to keep the max map/node limit at 2 or 3 (on a 4 core node) so that I do not starve the Datanode and Regionserver. I have other jobs that are network latency bound and would like to be able to run high numbers of them concurrently on each node. Though I can thread some jobs, there are some use cases that are difficult to thread (scanning from hbase) and there's significant complexity added to the job rather than letting hadoop handle the concurrency. > - Poor assignment of tasks to nodes creates some situations where you have multiple reducers on a single node but other nodes that received none. A limit of 1 reducer per node for that job would prevent that from happening. (only works with per-node limit) > - Poor mans MR job virtualization. Since we can limit a jobs resources, this gives much more control in allocating and dividing up resources of a large cluster. (makes most sense w/ cluster-wide limit) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-259-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 05:08:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97445 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 05:08:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 05:08:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 51012 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50975 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50961 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5832234C004 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <266843207.1247461694860.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730216#action_12730216 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------------------ I would like to call out some approaches this patch is taking explicitly, so that there's an opportunity for discussion: h4. 1. Setting secure permissions by default vs doing so only in the LinuxTaskController The patch sets permissions for localized job files and directories as part of the localization process itself, that is as soon as the files are localized, rather than in the TaskController. I believe this approach was taken primarily to secure permissions on the localized files on the disk ASAP. The effect of doing so is that now all configurations of hadoop, including those which do not worry about security will have secure permissions for some of the files. While this should be OK in principle, it must be noted that without the entire solution offered by the LinuxTaskController, full security is not achieved. Hence, does it make sense to make changes to the permissions only when using the LinuxTaskController (with a small window where files could have potentially insecure permissions), and leave the default case alone ? Either way, I think the current method in which permissions are changed for the localized files causes these to be splattered across the code. It may lead to mistakes in future if somebody is making changes (say to localize a new file) and is not fully aware of the permissions issue. Ideally it should be abstracted from the process. In speaking with Vinod about this, I realized this may not be very easy to achieve the way LocalDirAllocator currently works. If we keep the changes to the task controller alone, I believe this will be very easy to accomplish. h4. 2. Approach for sharing common files between TT and child The patch juggles around with permissions on the localized and intermediate files by first setting ownership to the job owner, and after the task is complete, changing the ownership back to the tasktracker user. The reason it does this, is for two purposes: -- To enable intermediate outputs to be served by the tasktracker, once the child has created them. -- To allow cleanup as the tasktracker once the tasks are done. Note that change of ownership is done by launching the task-controller setuid binary as root privileges are required for the purpose. The above two problems can be solved in another way as well (and this is what was discussed on HADOOP-4490). In that approach, we'd thought of moving the intermediate outputs to a different directory owned by the tasktracker, and we'd thought of removing files and directories as the user, as part of the cleanup thread. I think one advantage this alternative approach brings is that it gives an opportunity to not launch the task-controller for reduces and hence slots can become free sooner. This does mean the cleanup might take more time, but that happens asynchronously. On the other hand, the current model seems to be simpler to fit into mind. If a task is not complete, its files are owned by the job owner, if not, they are owned by TT. It is easy to check these rules on a running system. So, is it worth the change in approach to bring in a little optimization (which might actually not matter that much). h4. 3. Sandboxing task runtime environment by changing values of mapred.local.dir for the child The patch 'sandboxes' the task runtime environment, by changing the mapred.local.dir values from the original configured values to ${original mapred.local.dir}/taskTracker/jobCache/${job-id}/${task-id} and pass the new values to the child. Vinod told me that this was primarily required because checks in the LocalDirAllocator require the current process to have write permissions on the context passed to it (which is basically the mapred local directories). When the child calls LocalDirAllocator, it would now fail because the original mapred local directories will not have write permissions to world. Hence, the need to sandbox. Of course, it is also probably more secure. Two questions this raises: Is this change in contract acceptable ? If yes, is it acceptable in the default case as well, or should it be restricted to the case of LinuxTaskController alone. Either way, the current patch, in order to implement this behavior juggles around the values of the mapred.local.dir variable in conf file at 2-3 locations in the tasktracker code. I think that approach is error prone and needs to change. Thoughts on these three points ? > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-260-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 05:18:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99187 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 05:18:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 05:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 56290 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 05:18:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56252 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 05:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56242 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 05:18:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:18:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:18:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8065234C004 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <737525313.1247462294805.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730220#action_12730220 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------------------ Some other comments on the code: - The code models some of the commands passed to the taskcontroller as 'first task' for JVM or 'not first task' for JVM. This complicates the contract between the TT and the task-controller. I think at a minimum these decisions should be restricted only to the JVM manager, and the contract between the TT and task-controller should be handled by modelling new commands like FINALIZE_JVM and FINALIZE_TASK. - The patch introduces a log directory argument to the task-controller. I think this is not required as there is only one value for the hadoop.log.dir for all tasks. - Code related to creation of work dirs is removed from TaskRunner. Where is it created now ? - Permissions for job directory is changed multiple times - once per each task. - finalizeTaskDirs (or parts of it) needs to be synchronized. - In the case of jvm reuse, we still need to make the output available. Because it seems the task completion event is sent as soon as the task is done not after jvm exits. This is only a theoretical case possibly, but it still will be good to keep the code paths identical. - Path permissions should be taken care of ? so, if mapred.local.dir doesn't have execute permissions for others, we need to set them. - In setup, we seem to be setting permissions even if directory creation fails. also shouldn't we set permissions even if it exists.. so that it is right as per our requirement. - Didn't understand the purpose of initStatus. Since it starts out being true, wouldn't it always remain true ? - Cache directory probably doesn't need 777 because it is not written to by the tasks. We can probably retain this if HADOOP-4490 set like permissions, since this will be addressed in HADOOP-4493. - getBaseIntermediateOutputDir seems an overkill if it is just returning a constant. - Changes in SpillRecord seem to be unnecessary. Some nits: - There are some else blocks without code, but with a code comment explaining why there's no else block. While useful, it is somewhat unconventional. I would recommend the reason be moved to a comment starting the if block itself. - TODOs in the patch must be discussed and resolved. - TaskController.FILE_PERMISSIONS doesn't seem to be used anywhere. - Rename finalizeTaskDirs as finalizeTask - it matches with the naming convention for the other apis in taskcontroller. - Add a comment about why task-work is 755. - mapred.child.local.dir has an extra comma at the end. > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-261-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 07:59:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55388 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 07:59:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 07:59:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85935 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 07:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85894 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 07:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85878 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 07:59:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:59:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51D3234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <891603154.1247471954802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730246#action_12730246 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6145: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413186/COMMON-6145.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/568/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/568/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/568/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/568/console This message is automatically generated. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-262-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 10:53:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18056 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 10:53:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 10:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89926 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 10:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89889 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 10:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89879 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 10:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:53:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A26234C056 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1921752137.1247482394988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch upload a new patch integrated Chris' suggestions (Thanks, Chris). > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-263-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 11:09:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23085 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 11:09:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 11:09:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 3700 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 11:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3661 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 11:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3646 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 11:09:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:09:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75EC234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1322739965.1247483354802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730287#action_12730287 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6143: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413189/HADOOP-6143.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/569/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/569/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/569/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/569/console This message is automatically generated. > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Attachments: HADOOP-6143.patch > > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-264-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 11:53:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35302 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 11:53:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 11:53:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 59203 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59148 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:53:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8327234C053 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <576780672.1247485994950.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal reassigned HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-265-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 12:19:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44911 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 12:19:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 12:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 95988 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 12:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95939 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 12:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95708 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 12:19:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:19:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E522D234C052 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <965637874.1247487554937.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch changed the conf string io.compress.* to zlib.compress.* Supported conf strings are: zlib.compress.level values can be: NO_COMPRESSION / BEST_SPEED / BEST_COMPRESSION / DEFAULT_COMPRESSION zlib.compress.strategy values can be: FILTERED / HUFFMAN_ONLY / RLE / FIXED / DEFAULT_STRATEGY zlib.compress.buffer.size values can be any positive integer > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-266-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 13:01:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63383 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 13:01:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 13:01:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 51178 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:01:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51140 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51130 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 13:01:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:01:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:01:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D840234C052 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 ------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6146 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs/s3 Reporter: Tom White Assignee: Tom White Fix For: 0.21.0 The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-267-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 13:03:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64205 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 13:03:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 57343 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57305 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57295 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:03:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA0F234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1060836433.1247490195242.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:03:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6146: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6146.patch Patch for this issue. I have successfully run both Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest and Jets3tS3FileSystemContractTest with this patch. > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-268-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 13:03:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64244 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 13:03:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 57415 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57377 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57367 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 13:03:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:03:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:03:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60101234C052 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1572263846.1247490195392.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:03:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6146: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-269-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 17:21:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85566 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 17:21:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 17:21:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 14019 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:21:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13884 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13867 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 17:21:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:21:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:21:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556CA234C055 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1687778269.1247505675349.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:21:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6147) Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6147 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Sanjay Radia Amazon has introduced a new storage mechanism called EBS. Supposedly it is a lot more efficient than S3 for Hadoop. A filesystem plugin for hadoop would we be very useful for the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-270-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 17:33:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94043 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 35335 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35299 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35289 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:33:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF47329A001B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1863036025.1247506394979.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6147) Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) In-Reply-To: <1687778269.1247505675349.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730415#action_12730415 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6147: -------------------------------------- >From what I understand about EBS it will not give local access to storage but was developed by Amazon to be more efficient raw storage. Cloudera reported that the EBS plugin they have written for their customers, released in early June, is a lot more efficient than S3. (See http://apache.sys-con.com/node/997306) Cloudera how about please contributing this back to the community? If not any volunteers for writing this plugin? > Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > > Amazon has introduced a new storage mechanism called EBS. Supposedly it is a lot more efficient than S3 for Hadoop. > A filesystem plugin for hadoop would we be very useful for the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-271-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 17:35:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95953 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 17:35:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 17:35:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 38141 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38051 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37924 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 17:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:35:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A2234C1E7 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1396993252.1247506515031.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:35:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Abdul Qadeer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4012) Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730418#action_12730418 ] Abdul Qadeer commented on HADOOP-4012: -------------------------------------- I am making a new patch to accommodate concerns raised by Chris and Owen. Few files are in the "common" sub-project while the rest are in the "mapreduce". Since the older Hadoop project has been split into 3 sub-projects, how should I make the new patch? Should I make two patches or merge them to make one? > Providing splitting support for bzip2 compressed files > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-4012 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4012 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-4012-version1.patch, Hadoop-4012-version2.patch, Hadoop-4012-version3.patch, Hadoop-4012-version4.patch, Hadoop-4012-version5.patch, Hadoop-4012-version6.patch, Hadoop-4012-version7.patch, Hadoop-4012-version8.patch, Hadoop-4012-version9.patch > > > Hadoop assumes that if the input data is compressed, it can not be split (mainly due to the limitation of many codecs that they need the whole input stream to decompress successfully). So in such a case, Hadoop prepares only one split per compressed file, where the lower split limit is at 0 while the upper limit is the end of the file. The consequence of this decision is that, one compress file goes to a single mapper. Although it circumvents the limitation of codecs (as mentioned above) but reduces the parallelism substantially, as it was possible otherwise in case of splitting. > BZip2 is a compression / De-Compression algorithm which does compression on blocks of data and later these compressed blocks can be decompressed independent of each other. This is indeed an opportunity that instead of one BZip2 compressed file going to one mapper, we can process chunks of file in parallel. The correctness criteria of such a processing is that for a bzip2 compressed file, each compressed block should be processed by only one mapper and ultimately all the blocks of the file should be processed. (By processing we mean the actual utilization of that un-compressed data (coming out of the codecs) in a mapper). > We are writing the code to implement this suggested functionality. Although we have used bzip2 as an example, but we have tried to extend Hadoop's compression interfaces so that any other codecs with the same capability as that of bzip2, could easily use the splitting support. The details of these changes will be posted when we submit the code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-272-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 17:45:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 407 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 17:45:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 17:45:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 47554 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47514 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47504 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:45:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:45:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4465D234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <931975189.1247507115266.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon moved HDFS-297 to HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6148 (was: HDFS-297) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-273-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 17:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2394 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 17:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 17:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 51922 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51884 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 17:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51874 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 17:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BA234C052 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <222326463.1247507354914.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730423#action_12730423 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Moved this back to Common since this patch is for util. Just to make sure, I ran the current patch with 1M iterations instead of just 24 and it still passed (but took 44 seconds). I believe the IP issues look to be clean, so this should be ready for commit. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-274-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 18:51:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52084 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 18:51:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 18:51:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 63671 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:51:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63613 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63573 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 18:51:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:51:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:51:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8D9234C04B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <933768347.1247511074910.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730458#action_12730458 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6146: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413292/HADOOP-6146.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/570/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/570/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/570/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/570/console This message is automatically generated. > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-275-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 18:57:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58100 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 18:57:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 18:57:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 73735 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73699 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 18:57:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73681 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 18:57:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:57:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42517234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1699106268.1247511435257.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jay Booth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6147) Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) In-Reply-To: <1687778269.1247505675349.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730460#action_12730460 ] Jay Booth commented on HADOOP-6147: ----------------------------------- It's more efficient raw storage and you can mount it however you want -- from what I understand (only having messed with it very little), this would be something in how you set up your AMI, i.e. you set it up with a couple EBS stores that are striped RAID 0 and it will outperform the 'ephemeral' storage that you get for free with the instance. Major gain is that since you pay by gigabyte, you can do 4 5GB stores for the same price as 1 20GB store, so you can go either RAID 0 or RAID 5 depending on how you feel about node failure, and get faster IO for the same (or almost the same) cost per GB. After that setup's done, though, you just mount it to /mnt or /opt or wherever and use it like you would any other device, so I don't see much need to hadoop specific code. If I had to guess, what cloudera's distributing is a custom AMI, not any significant modification to Hadoop. Any of the above could be way off, though. > Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > > Amazon has introduced a new storage mechanism called EBS. Supposedly it is a lot more efficient than S3 for Hadoop. > A filesystem plugin for hadoop would we be very useful for the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-276-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 20:29:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99308 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 20:29:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 20:29:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 52156 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52018 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51913 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 20:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:29:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:29:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3EF234C055 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <344507574.1247516954897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeff Hammerbacher (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6147) Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) In-Reply-To: <1687778269.1247505675349.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Hammerbacher resolved HADOOP-6147. --------------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Dupe of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6108. > Hadoop Filesystem Plugin for Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS) > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > > Amazon has introduced a new storage mechanism called EBS. Supposedly it is a lot more efficient than S3 for Hadoop. > A filesystem plugin for hadoop would we be very useful for the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-277-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 22:56:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70162 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 22:56:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 22:56:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 56021 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 22:56:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55880 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 22:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55866 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 22:56:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:56:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:56:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E80E234C1E7 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1197158103.1247525775189.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730574#action_12730574 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------------------ srcFs.exists(src) and srcFs.isDirectory(src) both call srcFs.getFileStatus(src). We could call srcFs.getFileStatus(src) once in FsShell.delete(..) and save a rpc. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-278-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 13 23:58:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84674 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 23:58:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 23:58:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28222 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28172 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28010 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 23:58:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:58:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA294234C004 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1356270373.1247529494813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) canceling patch > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-279-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 00:00:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85396 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 00:00:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 28611 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28574 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28564 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF16D234C055 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1177421481.1247529614912.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Attachment: COMMON-6145.patch Attaching new Common patch for hudson. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-281-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 00:00:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85468 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 00:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28741 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28704 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28694 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D4829A0011 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <716705018.1247529614936.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) submitting patch > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-280-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 00:00:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85447 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 00:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28678 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28640 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28630 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56BD234C04B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1508728355.1247529614865.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6145.patch attaching new v20 patch > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-282-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 03:29:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67393 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 03:29:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 03:29:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 25517 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 03:29:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25344 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 03:29:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25314 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 03:29:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:29:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:29:19 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D05234C04B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <499719900.1247542138940.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:28:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730668#action_12730668 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6145: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413359/COMMON-6145.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/571/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/571/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/571/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/571/console This message is automatically generated. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-283-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 07:57:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51953 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 07:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 07:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 20056 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 07:57:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20018 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 07:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20001 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 07:57:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:57:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401BF234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <747032300.1247558235248.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6120_v2.patch This patch: - addresses Doug's concerns - moves the common code in abstract base class AvroSerialization - implements 'reflect' serialization based on Reflect#getSchema. The accept call is based on two mechanisms: tag interface - AvroReflectSerializable. package names. Applications can configure the package to be considered as reflect type. Applications then can use it with their existing classes without the need for implementing AvroReflectSerializable interface. - adds testcase > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-284-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 08:27:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59793 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 08:27:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 08:27:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 46017 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45980 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45970 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B53234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1981967536.1247560035231.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sreekanth Ramakrishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5420) Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sreekanth Ramakrishnan updated HADOOP-5420: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: 5420-fix-ydist.patch Fix for issue which was found internally. > Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 5420-fix-ydist.patch, hadoop-5420-1.patch, hadoop-5420-10.patch, hadoop-5420-11.patch, hadoop-5420-12.patch, hadoop-5420-2.patch, hadoop-5420-3.patch, hadoop-5420-4.patch, hadoop-5420-5.patch, hadoop-5420-6.patch, hadoop-5420-7.patch, hadoop-5420-8.patch, hadoop-5420-9.patch, HADOOP-5420-v20.patch, hadoop-5420.patch > > > Support setsid based kill in LinuxTaskController. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-285-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 09:29:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78064 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 09:29:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 09:29:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11090 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 09:29:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11048 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 09:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11038 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 09:29:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:29:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:29:51 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7C1234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <441814058.1247563770766.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:29:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-286-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 11:31:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33116 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 11:31:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 11:31:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 69014 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 11:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68996 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 11:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68986 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 11:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:17:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4B7234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <660338592.1247570235229.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:17:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730787#action_12730787 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-5879: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413291/hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch against trunk revision 793162. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 4 new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 266 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 260 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/572/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/572/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/572/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/572/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/572/console This message is automatically generated. > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-287-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 17:13:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84458 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 17:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 17:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 95642 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95604 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95587 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 17:13:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78C9234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2015748604.1247591594934.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730978#action_12730978 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- Looks good. Some comments: - in AvroSerialization, s/GenericDatum{Reader,Writer}/Datum{Reader,Writer}/? All implementations will probably always use a subclass of Generic, but it feels to me like this API should be more abstract, no? - in AvroReflectSerialization, 'List packages' might be more efficient as Set? - in AvroReflectSerialization, getPackages() could use Configuration#getStrings(). - does Avro's reflect API actually require that fields are public? Specific always generates public fields, but I think reflect should be able to serialize and deserialize private fields. If not, maybe we should fix that in Avro? > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-288-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 17:33:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94871 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 17:33:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 17:33:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 36694 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36634 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36521 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 17:33:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12D9234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <342813882.1247592794849.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-289-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 17:43:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3201 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 17:43:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 17:43:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 55137 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55099 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 17:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55089 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 17:43:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:43:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A74234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1446638366.1247593395217.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:43:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6145: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 0.20.1 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this to 0.20 and above. Thanks, Jakob! > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.20.1, 0.21.0 > > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-290-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 20:43:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98585 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 70610 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 20:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70573 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 20:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70563 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 20:43:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:43:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:43:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDADC234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1369633779.1247604194835.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731119#action_12731119 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------------- Scott and Todd, any plans to inform OpenJDK guys about this? > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-291-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 22:05:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56517 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 22:05:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 22:05:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 87998 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87922 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87885 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 22:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:05:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A3029A0015 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1932342868.1247609114947.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6149) FileStatus can support a fileid per path MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FileStatus can support a fileid per path ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6149 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6149 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: dhruba borthakur Assignee: dhruba borthakur Fix For: 0.21.0 FileStatus should expose a id that uniquely identifies a file. This helps in developing applications that work correctly even when files are moved from one directory to another. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-292-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 14 22:09:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58834 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2009 22:09:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 2009 22:09:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 94993 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:09:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94956 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2009 22:09:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94946 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2009 22:09:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:09:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4829A0018 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <765623826.1247609354931.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6149) FileStatus can support a fileid per path In-Reply-To: <1932342868.1247609114947.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731160#action_12731160 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6149: ------------------------------------------ Please see patch attached to HDFS-487. > FileStatus can support a fileid per path > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6149 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6149 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > FileStatus should expose a id that uniquely identifies a file. This helps in developing applications that work correctly even when files are moved from one directory to another. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-293-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 00:10:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16035 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 00:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 48136 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48097 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48087 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:10:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:10:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018129A001D for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1948836692.1247616615196.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: benchmarks20090714.txt benchmarks20090714.txt: benchmarks results > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-294-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 00:10:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16102 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 00:10:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 48219 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48177 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48167 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 00:10:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:10:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:10:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104E9234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <139034399.1247616615055.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:10:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: PureJavaCrc32.java I think the codes could be improved a little bit as following. {code} public void update(byte[] b, int off, final int len) { for(final int end = off + (len & ~3); off < end; ) { final int c0 = crc ^ b[off++]; final int c1 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; final int c2 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; final int c3 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; crc = T4[c0 & 0xff] ^ T3[c1 & 0xff] ^ T2[c2 & 0xff] ^ T1[c3 & 0xff]; } for(final int end = off + (len & 3); off < end; ) { crc = (crc >>> 8) ^ T1[(crc ^ b[off++]) & 0xff]; } } {code} PureJavaCrc32.java: I moved the codes around and did some benchmarks. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-295-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 00:34:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29158 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 00:34:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 00:34:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 59757 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:34:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59718 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 00:34:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59708 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 00:34:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:34:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:34:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBCE29A0011 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6150 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 Reporter: Hong Tang Assignee: Hong Tang Priority: Minor Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-296-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 03:18:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94003 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 03:18:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 03:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 97366 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 03:18:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97330 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 03:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97317 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 03:18:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:18:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:18:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36468234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1178128312.1247627895210.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731254#action_12731254 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- bq. All implementations will probably always use a subclass of Generic, but it feels to me like this API should be more abstract, no? Absolutely. I realized that but missed to use it in the patch. bq. reflect should be able to serialize and deserialize private fields. If not, maybe we should fix that in Avro? I have filed AVRO-78. At places the avro code uses Class#getFields() instead of Class#getDeclaredFields() > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-297-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 04:23:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5073 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 04:23:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 04:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 43926 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43888 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43878 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 04:23:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:23:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A06234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <78035294.1247631794847.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5420) Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731262#action_12731262 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-5420: ------------------------------------------- bq. Fix for issue which was found internally. This issue is marked as Fixed. Open a new JIRA with a description about the issue and attach the patch. > Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 5420-fix-ydist.patch, hadoop-5420-1.patch, hadoop-5420-10.patch, hadoop-5420-11.patch, hadoop-5420-12.patch, hadoop-5420-2.patch, hadoop-5420-3.patch, hadoop-5420-4.patch, hadoop-5420-5.patch, hadoop-5420-6.patch, hadoop-5420-7.patch, hadoop-5420-8.patch, hadoop-5420-9.patch, HADOOP-5420-v20.patch, hadoop-5420.patch > > > Support setsid based kill in LinuxTaskController. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-298-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 04:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8437 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 04:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 04:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 64150 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64110 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64099 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 04:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:47:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0E8234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2027491984.1247633234834.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ramya R (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6113) AccessControlException should display the full path MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramya R updated HADOOP-6113: ---------------------------- Tags: ygridqa > AccessControlException should display the full path > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6113 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6113 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Ramya R > Priority: Minor > > org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException should display the full path for which the access is denied. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-299-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 04:55:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10313 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 04:55:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 04:55:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 67065 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:55:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66981 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 04:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66961 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 04:55:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:55:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:55:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E87629A0014 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1261770437.1247633715255.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suman Sehgal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5323) Trash documentation needs to be more elaborated. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suman Sehgal updated HADOOP-5323: --------------------------------- Tags: ygridqa > Trash documentation needs to be more elaborated. > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Priority: Minor > > Trash documentation should mention the significance of "Current" and "" directories which get generated inside Trash directory. The documentation should also incorporate modifications done in HADOOP: 4970. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-300-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 05:31:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20620 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 05:31:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 05:31:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 90454 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 05:31:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90412 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 05:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90402 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 05:31:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:31:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:31:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2A6234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1754599294.1247635876247.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:31:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6120_v3.patch Incorporated review comments. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-301-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 05:41:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24600 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 05:41:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 05:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 98492 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 05:41:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98414 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 05:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98381 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 05:41:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:41:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:41:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E27234C004 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1800047364.1247636474856.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-302-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 08:27:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81202 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 08:27:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 08:27:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 59468 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59430 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59413 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 08:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD584234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1359424504.1247646434825.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731342#action_12731342 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413524/6120_v3.patch against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to cause Findbugs to fail. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/573/testReport/ Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/573/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/573/console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-303-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 08:49:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85712 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 08:49:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 08:49:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 80364 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 08:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80325 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 08:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80315 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 08:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04880234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <955978941.1247647755013.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:49:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731352#action_12731352 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- Hudson failed because patch needs avro jar. All tests passed locally. test-patch output: {code} -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 265 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 264 warnings). {code} Release audit warnings are due to test file avroRecord.avsc not having license header. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-304-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 11:47:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44034 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 11:47:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 11:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85394 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 11:47:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85356 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 11:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85344 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 11:47:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:47:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:47:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C36234C052 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <801390646.1247658435235.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6145) No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731404#action_12731404 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6145: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #27 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/27/]) . Fix FsShell rm/rmr error messages when there is a FNFE. Contributed by Jakob Homan > No error message for deleting non-existant file or directory. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6145 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Suman Sehgal > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.20.1, 0.21.0 > > Attachments: COMMON-6145.patch, COMMON-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch, HADOOP-6145.patch > > > If non-existant path or src is provided with rm/rmr option then no error message is displayed > command: hadoop dfs -rm (where src is non-existant) > dfs displays "rm: " > while it should display "No such file or directory". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-305-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 12:57:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86297 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 12:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 12:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89182 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 12:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89139 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 12:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89128 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 12:57:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:57:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18F7234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2110270720.1247662634844.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-6138: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch Sorry for the delay. Will open new jira for hdfs and mapreduce. > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-306-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 13:23:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96675 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 13:23:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 13:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31785 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 13:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31753 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 13:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31743 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 13:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCE4234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <113943841.1247664194820.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731433#action_12731433 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Looks good. Minor nits: * Move the testSerialization() method from TestWritableSerialization since it is now being used from the Avro tests. Something like SerializationTestUtil. * Add a package.html to the org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.avro package. Have you tried using either of these serializations with MapReduce? Something like TestJavaSerialization would be good (but this could be another issue). > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-307-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 13:33:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2649 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 13:33:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 13:33:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 57861 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 13:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57830 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 13:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57820 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 13:33:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5295234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <868654812.1247664794926.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731436#action_12731436 ] He Yongqiang commented on HADOOP-6138: -------------------------------------- filed hdfs-490 and mapreduce-765 accordingly. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-490 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-765 > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-308-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 16:26:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81976 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 16:26:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 16:26:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29675 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29653 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29643 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 16:26:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:26:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B01234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2103411870.1247675174858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6151) The servlets should quote html characters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The servlets should quote html characters ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6151 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: security Reporter: Owen O'Malley We need to quote html characters that come from user generated data. Otherwise, all of the web ui's have cross site scripting attack, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-309-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 16:53:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90825 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 16:53:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 16:53:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 75892 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75855 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75843 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 16:53:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:53:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA578234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1315763494.1247676794816.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5420) Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731554#action_12731554 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-5420: ------------------------------------------ bq. This issue is marked as Fixed. Open a new JIRA with a description about the issue and attach the patch. Rajiv, the reason why there is no new jira is because this is a bug that occurs only on the Yahoo! distribution and not on trunk. To give an explanation, the patch HADOOP-5420-v20.patch introduced some code to make sure the pid files written by the task-controller were owned by the tasktracker process, as a security check. Inadvertently, in this patch, we removed some code that changed the ownership of the pid file (which was written as root) to be owned by the TT user. As a result, pid files were created as root, but the new check introduced in the patch failed during kill because it found the PID files were not owned by the TT user and hence treated them as suspect. Hence tasks failed to be killed causing runaway processes on the cluster. The attached patch re-introduces the code that changes ownership of the pid file to the TT user so that during killing the security check would pass and processes would be killed. > Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 5420-fix-ydist.patch, hadoop-5420-1.patch, hadoop-5420-10.patch, hadoop-5420-11.patch, hadoop-5420-12.patch, hadoop-5420-2.patch, hadoop-5420-3.patch, hadoop-5420-4.patch, hadoop-5420-5.patch, hadoop-5420-6.patch, hadoop-5420-7.patch, hadoop-5420-8.patch, hadoop-5420-9.patch, HADOOP-5420-v20.patch, hadoop-5420.patch > > > Support setsid based kill in LinuxTaskController. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-310-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 17:05:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94013 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 17:05:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 17:05:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 92322 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 17:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92298 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 17:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92283 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 17:05:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:05:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:05:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCE4234C051 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1736966924.1247677515182.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731560#action_12731560 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------- Owen, Apologies for missing this e-mail for so long. I'm behind on the "all-jira" bucket, and I failed to set a watch. Hemanth, you should definitely forge ahead with the simple, expedient solution. I'd like to convince you and Owen that the more complicated proposal is a net win (and I've used a similar system in the past), but I think the best way to do that is to actually write the code and transform a few usages. I've been busy with some other deadlines, so when I get there, I'll file a JIRA and bother you all again. (To answer Owen's questions: the couple of classes for ConfigVariable go into the configuration package; users are welcome to use the same classes to set their variables, or they can set them manually; the documentation for the variables themselves is generated, the documentation for the system lives in JavaDoc on the individual classes and the package.) -- Philip > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-311-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 18:35:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55110 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 18:35:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 18:35:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 40088 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40071 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40060 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 18:20:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE75234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1176339992.1247682014821.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731604#action_12731604 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6146: --------------------------------------- +1 > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-312-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 18:36:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60469 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 18:36:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 18:36:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 69273 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:36:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69252 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:36:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69242 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 18:36:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:36:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:36:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D0A234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1050711742.1247682975009.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:36:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731612#action_12731612 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- Looks great! - shouldn't Serializer/Desrializer#close() call encoder/decoder.close()? - should AvroReflectSerialization#accept() be synchronized? I don't know if we generally require Serializers to be thread-safe, but it's probably best and should not have much performance impact. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-313-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 18:54:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68068 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 18:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 18:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 92805 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92781 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 18:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92766 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 18:54:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:54:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:54:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63FE234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1647543361.1247684054866.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:54:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: benchmarks20090715.txt Changed the benchmark as below such that there are ~4GB data in each run. {code} for(int j = 10; j < 24; j += 2) { for(int k = 0; k < 4; k++) { final int bytelen = (1 << j) + k; final byte[] b = new byte[bytelen]; final int n = (int)((1L << 32) / bytelen); ran.nextBytes(b); t.tick("ran.nextBytes, bytelen=" + bytelen); final SortedMap rank = new TreeMap(); test(pure, b, n, t, rank); test(test, b, n, t, rank); test(zip, b, n, t, rank); System.out.println("rank = " + rank); final Checksum c = rank.entrySet().iterator().next().getValue(); fastest.put(c, fastest.get(c) + 1); } } {code} benchmarks20090715.txt: new results It is consistent that TestCrc32 is faster than zip.CRC32, which is faster than PureJavaCrc32. There are ~13% improvement by TestCrc32 over PureJavaCrc32. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-314-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 19:04:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73354 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 19:04:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 19:04:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 10666 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 19:04:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10627 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 19:04:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10617 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 19:04:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:04:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:04:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB6B29A0013 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1312737691.1247684654911.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731631#action_12731631 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Thanks for the improvements, Nicholas. I should have a chance to verify your findings today or tomorrow. At first glance, it seems odd that zip.CRC32 is faster than PureJavaCrc32. Are you using the Sun JDK or OpenJDK? In my tests for large block sizes, Sun's JDK is slower than PureJavaCrc32, but OpenJDK's is faster. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-315-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 20:19:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1649 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 20:19:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 20:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 44154 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44116 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44106 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 20:19:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:19:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF287234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <106664792.1247689154847.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731657#action_12731657 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------------ I am using Sun JDK on Windows. {noformat} bash-3.2$ java -version java version "1.6.0_13" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing) {noformat} > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-316-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 20:43:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8366 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 20:43:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 65917 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65509 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64549 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 20:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ED829A002F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <758436615.1247689875203.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6152) Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath In-Reply-To: <283943906.1247689875148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-6152: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6152.patch This patch fixes the various bin/* scripts. > Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6152 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-6152.patch > > > The various Hadoop scripts (bin/hadoop, bin/hdfs, bin/mapred) do not properly identify the jars needed to run Hadoop. They try to include hadoop-*-hdfs.jar, etc, rather than the hadoop-hdfs-*.jar that is actually created by the 'ant jar' and 'ant package' targets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-318-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 20:43:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9114 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66865 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66105 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64548 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 20:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2483229A002B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <283943906.1247689875148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6152) Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6152 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Aaron Kimball Assignee: Aaron Kimball Priority: Blocker Attachments: HADOOP-6152.patch The various Hadoop scripts (bin/hadoop, bin/hdfs, bin/mapred) do not properly identify the jars needed to run Hadoop. They try to include hadoop-*-hdfs.jar, etc, rather than the hadoop-hdfs-*.jar that is actually created by the 'ant jar' and 'ant package' targets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-317-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 20:43:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9105 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 20:43:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 66796 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65915 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 20:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64566 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 20:32:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:32:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:31:57 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D68C29A0031 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1128125379.1247689875250.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6152) Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath In-Reply-To: <283943906.1247689875148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-6152: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6152 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-6152.patch > > > The various Hadoop scripts (bin/hadoop, bin/hdfs, bin/mapred) do not properly identify the jars needed to run Hadoop. They try to include hadoop-*-hdfs.jar, etc, rather than the hadoop-hdfs-*.jar that is actually created by the 'ant jar' and 'ant package' targets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-319-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 21:07:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19525 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 21:07:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 21:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 17672 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 21:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17630 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 21:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17567 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 21:07:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:07:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E64234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2132640084.1247692034801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731686#action_12731686 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- > Hudson failed because patch needs avro jar. The avro jar should soon appear in the Maven repo. Then we'll be able to just add it as a dependency in ivy.xml. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-320-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 21:09:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20355 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 21:09:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 21:09:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 19302 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 21:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19258 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 21:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19244 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 21:09:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:09:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:09:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE59D234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1466883101.1247692154840.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6151) The servlets should quote html characters In-Reply-To: <2103411870.1247675174858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun C Murthy updated HADOOP-6151: ---------------------------------- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > The servlets should quote html characters > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6151 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Critical > > We need to quote html characters that come from user generated data. Otherwise, all of the web ui's have cross site scripting attack, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-321-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 22:47:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70436 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 22:47:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 22:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 77667 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:47:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77630 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:47:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77620 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 22:47:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:47:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:47:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECC7234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1323016769.1247698034977.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:47:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731721#action_12731721 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Whatever that Timer class is that is being used to measure, it is using the system millisecond time, which has only ~15ms accuracy so the test run time needs to be long to be accurate. To get more accurate results, use System.nanoTime(). Also, I have found that a couple 'warmup' iterations of a test make the results much more consistent, to avoid the JIT interfering. Using the benchmark I did before (previously attached, TestCrc32Performance.java), the new version is consistently 10% slower than the previous on my machine (Java 6, Max OS X, Core2 Duo processor, 64 bit JVM). On Sun JRE 6.0_u14 on Linux (64 bit) with different CPUs, results vary. I'll dig into those details below. Results should be normalized to a metric we can compare to -- we have been using MB/sec so far. Additionally, the JVM and environment used is critical. Java 1.5 behaves VERY differently and I would expect changes like this to behave differently there (as well as with OpenJDK, IBM, or JRockit). There are two changes here -- the loop format and termination, and how the shifts and masks are packed. Adding or removing the final declarations makes no difference in my testing -- the compiler easily identifies whether variables change or not. These two changes, taken alone, or taken together have varied results. This is probably because loop unrolling in the JIT behaves differently. Generally, the loop change helped the least, it only avoids a decrement on a loop condition, which is essentially free for some processors, and it has higher start-up cost and more variables. Here are results on my laptop, followed by two different servers. Note, that the first two results in any test are always lower than the rest, regardless of what order i do the tests, so consider the 'size 1' scores suspect. Here are my results with the new version posted on my laptop Core2 Duo -- 2.5Ghz, 4GB 667Mhz DDR2 SDRAM, OSX 10.5.7 Java 6 (Apple): $ java -Xmx512m -cp testall.jar org.apache.hadoop.util.TestCrc32Performance ||num bytes||NewLoopOnly MB/sec||NewInnerOnly MB/sec||NewPureJava MB/sec||PureJava MB/sec||Native MB/sec|| | 1 |85.195 |94.160 |121.054 |117.785 |6.580 | | 2 |123.629 |133.855 |131.112 |164.309 |12.354 | | 4 |226.677 |220.528 |194.145 |287.520 |24.309 | | 8 |240.169 |262.491 |253.665 |283.975 |45.353 | | 16 |343.329 |364.299 |354.749 |383.966 |77.207 | | 32 |441.347 |445.800 |433.381 |462.508 |122.829 | | 64 |522.195 |522.210 |502.894 |528.559 |188.184 | | 128 |570.476 |551.149 |541.540 |555.572 |194.542 | | 256 |596.147 |577.042 |558.884 |591.713 |289.183 | | 512 |601.956 |583.593 |561.882 |593.323 |315.714 | | 1024 |623.217 |592.406 |577.292 |603.304 |332.319 | | 2048 |623.979 |594.163 |581.419 |606.365 |341.448 | | 4096 |624.345 |596.289 |584.365 |610.018 |344.685 | | 8192 |626.711 |593.323 |585.424 |607.542 |347.891 | | 16384 |625.938 |599.650 |584.414 |607.903 |350.221 | | 32768 |623.995 |583.516 |577.771 |609.930 |349.754 | | 65536 |623.906 |594.321 |578.602 |610.338 |347.915 | | 131072 |624.308 |595.950 |577.024 |610.308 |350.647 | | 262144 |629.946 |590.831 |577.453 |610.285 |351.603 | | 524288 |623.757 |597.578 |575.428 |610.399 |349.063 | | 1048576 |624.043 |596.817 |577.521 |610.798 |352.213 | | 2097152 |627.303 |591.817 |573.852 |610.981 |352.406 | | 4194304 |623.168 |593.048 |570.512 |605.679 |347.898 | | 8388608 |609.118 |587.879 |562.892 |600.384 |344.380 | | 16777216 |610.116 |585.480 |555.988 |601.001 |348.796 | For the above, the new loop helps, the new inner code hurts, and combined it is worst. For small checksum sizes all are worse. For a Linux server (Dual quad core Xeon E5335 @ 2.00GHz), Sun JDK 1.6.0_u14 the results are different. The Loop change does not help, changing the inner code alone helps the most, and combining the two is somewhere in-between, and for very small sizes its always slower: java -Xmx512m -XX:+UseParallelOldGC -XX:+UseCompressedOops -cp testall.jar org.apache.hadoop.util.TestCrc32Performance ||num bytes||NewLoopOnly MB/sec||NewInnerOnly MB/sec||NewPureJava MB/sec||PureJava MB/sec||Native MB/sec|| | 1 |66.281 |66.264 |85.825 |93.888 |7.331 | | 2 |93.812 |94.895 |92.638 |129.917 |13.931 | | 4 |155.431 |144.819 |161.540 |178.275 |26.586 | | 8 |174.531 |185.222 |206.577 |185.253 |47.892 | | 16 |244.490 |275.026 |292.237 |256.664 |81.922 | | 32 |306.768 |351.271 |345.710 |313.523 |127.560 | | 64 |350.763 |407.539 |382.370 |352.997 |175.000 | | 128 |377.402 |442.239 |406.650 |376.721 |218.138 | | 256 |392.901 |461.884 |420.526 |390.215 |247.586 | | 512 |397.682 |467.375 |425.522 |393.319 |264.732 | | 1024 |404.145 |474.192 |430.791 |391.678 |272.883 | | 2048 |407.673 |478.888 |433.719 |400.236 |277.638 | | 4096 |409.028 |480.907 |435.645 |401.338 |280.214 | | 8192 |409.890 |482.769 |436.209 |402.037 |281.782 | | 16384 |409.565 |482.726 |436.340 |401.767 |282.409 | | 32768 |407.943 |481.176 |436.373 |399.955 |282.455 | | 65536 |407.933 |481.746 |435.970 |400.228 |282.761 | | 131072 |408.003 |481.723 |436.516 |399.973 |282.749 | | 262144 |407.412 |481.357 |436.067 |400.962 |283.193 | | 524288 |408.077 |481.335 |436.416 |401.280 |283.137 | | 1048576 |408.016 |481.625 |436.086 |402.039 |283.308 | | 2097152 |407.397 |481.386 |436.131 |401.394 |283.353 | | 4194304 |406.609 |479.130 |434.960 |400.632 |282.376 | | 8388608 |403.235 |475.130 |430.770 |397.797 |280.904 | | 16777216 |402.891 |474.464 |430.427 |397.324 |280.951 | Lastly, I have access to a dual quad core Nehalem system Xeon X5550 @ 2.67GHz. The trend is similar to the other Linux server. ||num bytes||NewLoopOnly MB/sec||NewInnerOnly MB/sec||NewPureJava MB/sec||PureJava MB/sec||Native MB/sec|| | 1 |100.809 |105.911 |124.574 |168.577 |17.863 | | 2 |144.671 |157.576 |150.993 |203.188 |33.722 | | 4 |230.455 |226.380 |250.517 |276.617 |64.370 | | 8 |263.961 |288.727 |308.807 |292.203 |103.247 | | 16 |345.860 |419.419 |454.893 |394.811 |158.828 | | 32 |437.694 |536.016 |534.576 |470.360 |226.527 | | 64 |503.768 |611.457 |579.010 |470.782 |281.814 | | 128 |537.179 |650.089 |614.528 |522.099 |317.293 | | 256 |557.598 |672.534 |630.303 |558.545 |344.511 | | 512 |561.642 |677.876 |611.557 |463.531 |345.938 | | 1024 |565.044 |690.742 |615.121 |558.021 |367.634 | | 2048 |583.641 |714.832 |634.747 |602.027 |372.008 | | 4096 |594.691 |717.332 |643.951 |598.466 |369.619 | | 8192 |562.813 |639.987 |596.214 |560.489 |366.227 | | 16384 |540.490 |682.933 |481.701 |571.237 |373.531 | | 32768 |520.446 |636.502 |563.346 |539.832 |333.878 | | 65536 |498.553 |617.019 |556.558 |528.404 |343.788 | | 131072 |526.779 |625.905 |585.023 |520.933 |333.155 | | 262144 |535.428 |617.910 |568.184 |530.084 |337.989 | | 524288 |563.442 |637.368 |623.922 |578.144 |379.028 | | 1048576 |578.139 |709.259 |632.558 |596.539 |374.711 | | 2097152 |537.883 |662.951 |634.672 |583.292 |363.072 | | 4194304 |551.819 |677.231 |632.805 |580.628 |372.185 | | 8388608 |581.055 |689.236 |624.939 |584.958 |358.719 | | 16777216 |563.078 |675.309 |566.319 |579.324 |365.306 | So it looks like the winner is to change the inner part of the loop only. Although this hurts a bit on Apple's VM, that isn't a production VM. Unless there is data for some other VM's that suggests this is a poor choice it looks best to me. It is slightly slower for sizes less than about 8 bytes however The code is: {code} public void update(byte[] b, int off, int len) { while(len > 3) { int c0 = crc ^ b[off++]; int c1 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; int c2 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; int c3 = (crc >>>= 8) ^ b[off++]; crc = T4[c0 & 0xff] ^ T3[c1 & 0xff] ^ T2[c2 & 0xff] ^ T1[c3 & 0xff]; len -=4; } while(len > 0) { crc = (crc >>> 8) ^ T1[(crc ^ b[off++]) & 0xff]; len --; } }{code} > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-322-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 22:51:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72073 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 22:51:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 22:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 81617 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:51:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81577 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:51:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81567 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 22:51:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:51:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:51:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFED234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <220200760.1247698274832.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Carey updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Attachment: PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java PureJavaCrc32New.java variations of the CRC for testing. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-323-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 22:53:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72637 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 22:53:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 22:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 86529 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86493 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86483 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 22:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:53:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F74234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <45040754.1247698394809.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Carey updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Attachment: TestCrc32Performance.java New test, testing performance of many crc variants and spending more time warming up each of them to make sure the JIT has compiled them to native. System.gc() calls were experimented with to make results more consistent from run to run. Typically, I have been running this with -Xmx512m > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-324-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 22:57:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73562 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 22:57:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 89358 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89322 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89274 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DEB29A0015 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1618262767.1247698634928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (HADOOP-6151) The servlets should quote html characters In-Reply-To: <2103411870.1247675174858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731727#action_12731727 ] Owen O'Malley edited comment on HADOOP-6151 at 7/15/09 3:56 PM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- I believe the transforms should be: 1. & -> &amp; 2. < -> &lt; 3. > -> &gt; 4. ' -> &apos; 5. "-> &quot; As long as we do those transforms, any html that the user includes in their data will just be treated as literal text rather than html commands. was (Author: owen.omalley): I believe the transforms should be: 1. & -> & 2. < -> < 3. > -> > 4. ' -> ' 5. "-> " As long as we do those transforms, any html that the user includes in their data will just be treated as literal text rather than html commands. > The servlets should quote html characters > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6151 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Critical > > We need to quote html characters that come from user generated data. Otherwise, all of the web ui's have cross site scripting attack, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-325-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 22:57:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73600 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 22:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89429 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89392 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89382 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 22:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA4B234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <972627625.1247698634825.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6151) The servlets should quote html characters In-Reply-To: <2103411870.1247675174858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731727#action_12731727 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6151: --------------------------------------- I believe the transforms should be: 1. & -> & 2. < -> < 3. > -> > 4. ' -> ' 5. "-> " As long as we do those transforms, any html that the user includes in their data will just be treated as literal text rather than html commands. > The servlets should quote html characters > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6151 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6151 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Critical > > We need to quote html characters that come from user generated data. Otherwise, all of the web ui's have cross site scripting attack, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-326-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:05:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75130 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:05:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 95919 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95882 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95869 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:05:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E212829A0011 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <941989418.1247699114925.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731732#action_12731732 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- {quote} I am using Sun JDK on Windows. {noformat} bash-3.2$ java -version java version "1.6.0_13" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing) {noformat}{quote} You are using the Client VM, not the Server VM. Try some tests with the -server flag. You are also using a 32 bit VM, which may have a small effect here. But the Server versus Client VM makes a big difference here. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-327-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:07:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75631 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:07:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 1066 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 999 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 975 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC52F234C04B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <749050436.1247699234901.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6152) Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath In-Reply-To: <283943906.1247689875148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731733#action_12731733 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6152: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413596/HADOOP-6152.patch against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/574/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/574/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/574/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/574/console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6152 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-6152.patch > > > The various Hadoop scripts (bin/hadoop, bin/hdfs, bin/mapred) do not properly identify the jars needed to run Hadoop. They try to include hadoop-*-hdfs.jar, etc, rather than the hadoop-hdfs-*.jar that is actually created by the 'ant jar' and 'ant package' targets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-328-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:13:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76813 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6498 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6473 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6463 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:13:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B87234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <207955473.1247699594800.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6152) Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath In-Reply-To: <283943906.1247689875148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731736#action_12731736 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6152: --------------------------------------- No tests added because we don't have a test framework that works around the end-user package target. > Hadoop scripts do not correctly put jars on the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6152 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6152 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HADOOP-6152.patch > > > The various Hadoop scripts (bin/hadoop, bin/hdfs, bin/mapred) do not properly identify the jars needed to run Hadoop. They try to include hadoop-*-hdfs.jar, etc, rather than the hadoop-hdfs-*.jar that is actually created by the 'ant jar' and 'ant package' targets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-329-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:21:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77818 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:21:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 14022 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:21:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13983 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:21:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13967 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:21:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:21:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:21:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51BF234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <757199186.1247700074910.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731739#action_12731739 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Here are the results from my laptop. PureJavaTW is Tsz Wo's updated version. First, 64-bit JVM: ||num bytes||NewLoopOnly MB/sec||NewInnerOnly MB/sec||NewPureJava MB/sec||PureJava MB/sec||||PureJavaTW MB/sec||Native MB/sec|| | 1 |79.721 |87.113 |111.889 |112.642 |88.684 |9.001 | | 2 |91.820 |130.441 |130.855 |133.645 |131.948 |17.536 | | 4 |167.315 |223.087 |198.984 |243.936 |198.387 |33.488 | | 8 |188.153 |254.671 |243.899 |248.944 |242.746 |59.258 | | 16 |311.118 |353.191 |350.826 |327.231 |333.589 |99.213 | | 32 |401.696 |416.339 |417.406 |427.676 |408.610 |148.742 | | 64 |499.747 |483.148 |445.437 |472.814 |487.970 |208.478 | | 128 |530.055 |520.043 |505.709 |513.645 |457.080 |253.756 | | 256 |489.407 |541.459 |523.867 |547.794 |510.867 |283.360 | | 512 |561.871 |528.383 |528.368 |553.071 |530.421 |300.134 | | 1024 |579.227 |549.401 |537.941 |551.488 |536.391 |293.307 | | 2048 |586.443 |551.685 |540.289 |564.328 |539.412 |319.766 | | 4096 |608.470 |573.333 |560.746 |586.014 |560.349 |332.661 | | 8192 |590.123 |554.975 |543.089 |424.834 |517.325 |322.192 | | 16384 |583.385 |539.704 |542.656 |567.484 |542.567 |324.026 | | 32768 |583.592 |551.508 |533.585 |561.559 |529.811 |321.858 | | 65536 |584.476 |553.217 |537.679 |544.507 |512.978 |310.739 | | 131072 |548.941 |529.097 |534.430 |564.858 |533.955 |324.626 | | 262144 |584.379 |551.733 |536.386 |564.063 |479.038 |324.117 | | 524288 |583.262 |553.893 |536.770 |563.518 |532.404 |324.924 | | 1048576 |581.947 |550.572 |533.850 |561.049 |512.846 |294.452 | | 2097152 |566.543 |534.695 |484.256 |551.693 |527.730 |320.850 | | 4194304 |569.545 |537.748 |520.731 |547.608 |522.762 |318.084 | | 8388608 |593.932 |563.233 |530.600 |571.098 |545.905 |310.115 | | 16777216 |573.095 |560.361 |545.069 |576.036 |529.475 |331.984 | And 32-bit JVM on the same machine: ||num bytes||NewLoopOnly MB/sec||NewInnerOnly MB/sec||NewPureJava MB/sec||PureJava MB/sec||||PureJavaTW MB/sec||Native MB/sec|| | 1 |56.832 |51.138 |60.116 |60.826 |47.624 |7.612 | | 2 |84.111 |82.710 |83.672 |81.422 |82.630 |15.075 | | 4 |167.204 |138.900 |147.189 |163.798 |147.762 |30.063 | | 8 |175.720 |177.396 |184.865 |180.241 |186.981 |54.772 | | 16 |227.769 |257.112 |245.795 |247.928 |245.016 |94.794 | | 32 |279.098 |336.251 |267.332 |298.998 |286.251 |147.808 | | 64 |304.806 |381.515 |321.722 |339.217 |318.546 |207.577 | | 128 |316.745 |433.474 |339.159 |356.571 |337.731 |255.225 | | 256 |331.208 |454.923 |315.551 |374.849 |342.356 |291.948 | | 512 |333.462 |451.160 |351.006 |374.545 |344.597 |312.074 | | 1024 |332.338 |462.433 |350.361 |375.159 |359.086 |324.510 | | 2048 |329.805 |472.755 |361.305 |379.140 |338.142 |317.101 | | 4096 |326.613 |466.729 |349.653 |345.593 |337.487 |317.728 | | 8192 |313.368 |458.838 |357.077 |384.962 |348.174 |332.353 | | 16384 |338.060 |448.738 |341.744 |371.819 |337.915 |295.606 | | 32768 |301.724 |451.107 |346.410 |381.720 |322.610 |332.183 | | 65536 |337.599 |472.797 |328.112 |383.809 |324.456 |336.955 | | 131072 |338.017 |471.498 |351.307 |383.234 |350.165 |338.728 | | 262144 |338.063 |472.881 |351.411 |383.875 |350.652 |338.079 | | 524288 |338.175 |471.574 |349.477 |381.680 |348.984 |334.452 | | 1048576 |333.453 |460.829 |343.706 |381.459 |346.565 |334.384 | | 2097152 |335.291 |465.923 |347.260 |374.896 |330.102 |330.254 | | 4194304 |332.436 |460.711 |340.488 |378.804 |346.389 |334.329 | | 8388608 |334.700 |464.714 |347.837 |378.336 |346.230 |324.550 | | 16777216 |316.521 |431.736 |342.807 |373.638 |341.928 |328.748 | It seems to me that, on the 64-bit JVM, most of the implementations are within margin of error at the sizes that are most often exercised (128 to 256 bytes). On 32-bit, the NewInnerOnly wins by a reasonable amount. I say we commit the NewInnerOnly version. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-330-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:39:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80635 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:39:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 25977 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25954 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25944 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE98E234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <120105708.1247701154831.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731743#action_12731743 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------------ Thanks, Scott and Todd for checking the performance in such great details! > I say we commit the NewInnerOnly version. +1 BTW, the path for TestPureJavaCrc32 is wrong in the previous patch. We don't have "core" directory anymore. {code} --- /dev/null +++ src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/util/TestPureJavaCrc32.java @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ {code} > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-331-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:45:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82167 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 28696 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28658 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28646 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFDE234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2013429545.1247701514838.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731746#action_12731746 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Good catch on the patch. I'll prepare a new one shortly that fixes that and includes the NewInnerOnly implementation, unless you're already on it. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-332-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 15 23:45:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82194 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 23:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 28761 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28720 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28708 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483F629A001B for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <156566319.1247701515295.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731747#action_12731747 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------------ Since the benchmark program is very useful, we may combine TestCrc32Performance with TestPureJavaCrc32. Then, the benchmark can be executed by something like "java TestPureJavaCrc32" in the future. Todd, could you post a new patch? > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-333-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 00:11:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88491 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 00:11:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 00:11:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 52911 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52872 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52862 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AB2234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1960073109.1247703074811.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731750#action_12731750 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Interesting results. Todd, were you using -server on the 32 bit version? If its Windows, client is the default, if its Linux, server is, and on a Mac 32 bit = Java 1.5. In this benchmark, the Mac Java 1.5 32 bit JVM has equal performance between the previous version and the InnerOnly version -- but slower than native except for sizes 128 and under -- so its a somewhat useless test for the expected usage of this code. I wasn't able to run against the newest 32 bit Sun JVM on a Linux server or to try out -client. There is no -client for the 64 bit Sun JVMs. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-334-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 00:17:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89244 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 00:17:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 00:17:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 57483 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 00:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57441 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 00:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57425 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 00:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:17:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E6234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <792362145.1247703434821.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:17:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731752#action_12731752 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- {quote}It seems to me that, on the 64-bit JVM, most of the implementations are within margin of error at the sizes that are most often exercised (128 to 256 bytes).{quote} What are the most common use cases, and where else should this code be used other than HDFS? For HDFS, the default checksum block size is 512 bytes. For the bzip2 code, it is using its own CRC32 -- perhaps that should change. For any .zip file compression or decompression, I'm not sure what the typical use case is. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-335-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 03:19:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8630 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 03:19:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 03:19:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 47689 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47649 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47632 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75E3234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <587382899.1247710814808.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731772#action_12731772 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6148: --------------------------------------- Since map/reduce uses CRC to check the spills, the size can be arbitrary length. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-336-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 03:22:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9272 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 03:22:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 03:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 51938 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51900 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51659 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 02:23:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF76F234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6153 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io, native Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) Reporter: Daehyun Kim Assignee: Daehyun Kim Priority: Minor It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-337-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 03:26:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10737 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 03:26:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 03:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 52914 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52878 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52864 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 02:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:27:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F47234C004 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761227278.1247711234780.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-338-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 04:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23219 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 04:10:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 04:10:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 23063 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 04:11:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22958 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 04:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22926 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 04:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E26234C045 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <109977329.1247717474932.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jerome Boulon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6154) MultiSortedTFileScanner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org MultiSortedTFileScanner ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-6154 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6154 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: io Reporter: Jerome Boulon Given a set of sorted Tfiles or a directory with several sorted Tfiles, it would be nice to have an helper class that help reading those Tfiles in a total sort order. The MultiSortedTFileScanner class could take a directory as input or Tfile could be dynamically added/removed to/from the MultiSortedTFileScanner. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-339-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 07:02:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86550 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 07:02:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 07:02:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 46814 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 07:03:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46777 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 07:03:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46767 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 07:03:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:03:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:03:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAD6234C045 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <277363383.1247727794893.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt Uploading mapred part of the patch that incorporates most of the review comments. {quote} - In the case of jvm reuse, we still need to make the output available. Because it seems the task completion event is sent as soon as the task is done not after jvm exits. This is only a theoretical case possibly, but it still will be good to keep the code paths identical. - finalizeTaskDirs (or parts of it) needs to be synchronized. - Path permissions should be taken care of ? so, if mapred.local.dir doesn't have execute permissions for others, we need to set them. - In setup, we seem to be setting permissions even if directory creation fails. also shouldn't we set permissions even if it exists.. so that it is right as per our requirement. - Cache directory probably doesn't need 777 because it is not written to by the tasks. We can probably retain this if HADOOP-4490 set like permissions, since this will be addressed in HADOOP-4493. - getBaseIntermediateOutputDir seems an overkill if it is just returning a constant. - Changes in SpillRecord seem to be unnecessary. - TaskController.FILE_PERMISSIONS doesn't seem to be used anywhere. - Rename finalizeTaskDirs as finalizeTask - it matches with the naming convention for the other apis in taskcontroller. - Add a comment about why task-work is 755. - mapred.child.local.dir has an extra comma at the end. {quote} -- Done * Permissions for job directory is changed multiple times - once per each task. -- Done. Added a new INITIALIZE_JOB command. * Code related to creation of work dirs is removed from TaskRunner. Where is it created now ? -- This is actually not needed. The work dirs are already created before at TaskTracker.localizeTask() (creation of cwd) * Didn't understand the purpose of initStatus. Since it starts out being true, wouldn't it always remain true ? -- initStatus is used to track if directory creation is failing on all the disks. It was incorrectly initialized to true. Fixed this. Things to be done: {quote} - The code models some of the commands passed to the taskcontroller as 'first task' for JVM or 'not first task' for JVM. This complicates the contract between the TT and the task-controller. I think at a minimum these decisions should be restricted only to the JVM manager, and the contract between the TT and task-controller should be handled by modelling new commands like FINALIZE_JVM and FINALIZE_TASK. - The patch introduces a log directory argument to the task-controller. I think this is not required as there is only one value for the hadoop.log.dir for all tasks. - TODOs in the patch must be discussed and resolved. - Rename finalizeTaskDirs as finalizeTask. To be done in the task-controller code 1. Setting secure permissions by default vs doing so only in the LinuxTaskController 2. Approach for sharing common files between TT and child 3. Sandboxing task runtime environment by changing values of mapred.local.dir for the child {quote} > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-340-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 07:38:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96668 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 07:38:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 07:38:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 90627 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 07:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90590 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 07:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90580 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 07:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:39:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3061E234C045 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1275290190.1247729955193.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6149) FileStatus can support a fileid per path In-Reply-To: <1932342868.1247609114947.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6149: ------------------------------------- Attachment: fileidc1.txt This patch introduces a new filed called fileid in the FileStatus object. There are setter and getter methods on FileStatus for fileid. > FileStatus can support a fileid per path > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6149 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6149 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: fileidc1.txt > > > FileStatus should expose a id that uniquely identifies a file. This helps in developing applications that work correctly even when files are moved from one directory to another. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-341-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:13:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46684 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:13:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:13:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 99751 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:14:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99715 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:14:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99705 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:14:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:14:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:14:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E36234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <184258659.1247739255321.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:14:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-5107) split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan reassigned HADOOP-5107: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5107 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > I think to support splitting the projects, we should publish the jars for 0.20.0 as independent jars to the Maven repository -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-342-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:15:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47473 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:15:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:15:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2580 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2496 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2465 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:16:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:16:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:16:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6101234C045 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2094177475.1247739374941.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5107) split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-5107: --------------------------------------- Attachment: mapreduce-trunk.patch hdfs-trunk.patch common-trunk.patch > split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5107 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: common-trunk.patch, hdfs-trunk.patch, mapreduce-trunk.patch > > > I think to support splitting the projects, we should publish the jars for 0.20.0 as independent jars to the Maven repository -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-343-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:23:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52305 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:23:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:23:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 17619 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17585 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17575 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:24:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:24:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CDA234C1E7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <221676377.1247739855067.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5107) split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731884#action_12731884 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-5107: -------------------------------------------- steps: To publish common's jar's to the local repository : ie : /home//ivyrepo cd common-trunk apply common-trunk.patch ant ivy-publish-local this would publish hadoop-core and hadoop-core-test jar to the local filesystem based repository. cd hdfs-trunk apply hdfs-trunk.patch ant ivy-publish-local -Dresolver=local this would publish hdfs jars to the local filesystem based repository -Dresolver=local option tells ivy to resolve the common jars from the local filesystem based repository cd mapreduce-trunk apply mapreduce-trunk.patch ant ivy-publish-local -Dresolver=local this would publish mapred jars to the local filesystem based repository -Dresolver=local option tells ivy to resolve the common and hdfs jars from the local filesystem based repository this patch also has a ssh based resolver that publishes artifacts to the people server's home folder but that requires authentication. > split the core, hdfs, and mapred jars from each other and publish them independently to the Maven repository > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5107 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5107 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: common-trunk.patch, hdfs-trunk.patch, mapreduce-trunk.patch > > > I think to support splitting the projects, we should publish the jars for 0.20.0 as independent jars to the Maven repository -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-344-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:23:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52388 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:23:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:23:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17726 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17684 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17674 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:24:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:24:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:24:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BCE234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <863476739.1247739854864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731883#action_12731883 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------------------ I looked at the C code that was pending from previous review. Looking good overall. I have a few comments - mostly minor: - Should the pointer returned by strdup in configuration.get_value() be freed ? It doesn't seem to be in some cases. - Return value of any code path calling concatenate should be checked, as it can be null. - I think we can use stat instead of opendir to check for existence of path. - Check return value of fts calls. - I think it may be good to use the flag FTS_NOSTAT as we don't use stat info and it looks like it is an optimization to do so. - It may be safe to handle a default case in secure_path, just in case versions of FTS have types we are not handling. For e.g we are not handling FTS_ERR. - The value of the process_flag seems against the name. It should be true (non zero) if we want to process and false (zero) otherwise. Then code like if (!process_path) continue; can be used. Similarly for the variables 'failed' and 'first_task' - We can use strerror that will print a standard message per errno itself, for calls like chown etc. rather than printing the error message ourselves based on errno. - What are the permissions for the tasklog attempt directories ? Since they're not being set, will they take the value of the default umask ? - check_owner is removed. Need to make sure this is ok. - Let's add debug prints into #ifdef DEBUG or something similar. - Looks like run_task_as_user shares code with initialize_task. Can it call initialize_task directly ? - In TERMINATE_TASK_JVM, we are not using first_task - remove the argument to task-controller. Also for clarity, I think we can call the argument as cleanup_work_dirs or something like that, rather than first_task. - There seems to be a spurious call to open_log_file in TERMINATE_TASK_JVM. - display_usage seems out of place in task-controller.c. Can we move it to main ? > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-345-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:35:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59461 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:35:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:35:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 45830 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45793 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:36:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45783 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:36:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:36:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:36:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0201234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1884041079.1247740574845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731891#action_12731891 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- bq. shouldn't Serializer/Desrializer#close() call encoder/decoder.close()? I don't see encoder/decoder has close() method. Am I missing something? > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-346-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:39:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60344 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:39:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:39:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 57824 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57773 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57570 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:40:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:40:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E8D234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1624232401.1247740814851.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6120_v4.patch Taken care of Tom and Doug's comments: # Moved the testSerialization() method from TestWritableSerialization # Added package.html to the org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.avro # Made AvroReflectSerialization#accept() as synchronized > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-347-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:45:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61980 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:45:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:45:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 66516 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:46:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66478 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:46:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66468 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:46:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:46:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:46:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25E5234C04C for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <432710077.1247741174926.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731897#action_12731897 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- bq. Have you tried using either of these serializations with MapReduce? Something like TestJavaSerialization would be good (but this could be another issue). Now after the project split this *has* to be another issue. *smile* > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-348-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 10:57:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65373 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 10:57:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 10:57:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 89857 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:58:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89796 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 10:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89778 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 10:58:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:58:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B94E234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1659293976.1247741895235.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-6138: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-349-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 11:39:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76584 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 11:39:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 11:39:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 63143 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 11:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63104 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 11:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63094 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 11:40:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:40:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EAA234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1681158606.1247744415114.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731908#action_12731908 ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------------- Assumptions: 1. None of the *-default.xml files would have deprecated keys. ======== Changes to set and get method in configuration. get(name): the key(name) is checked in the deprecation map. If present, the method returns the value of the first key in the list of new keys. set(name,value): the key (name) is checked in the deprecation map. If present, the method sets all the new replacing keys with "value". ======== Following table describes the set and get behaviour: ||Old Key ||New Key ||get(oldkey) ||get(newKey)|| |set|set|old/newValue(whichever is recently set)|old/new value(whichever is recently set)| |unSet|unSet|default value of newKey|default value of new key| |set|unSet|oldValue|old value| |unSet|set|newValue|newValue| Note: the set and unset in the above table refers to the keys being set dynamically i.e calling Configuration setter methods. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-350-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 13:47:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41547 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 13:47:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 13:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 46218 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 13:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46198 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 13:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46188 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 13:48:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:48:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:48:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF1D234C044 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1966042385.1247752094818.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731941#action_12731941 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6138: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413546/hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 262 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 260 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/console This message is automatically generated. > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-351-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 16:08:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30712 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 16:08:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 16:08:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 34714 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 16:09:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34685 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 16:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34648 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 16:09:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:09:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC27234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <953989948.1247760554818.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732002#action_12732002 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------- You might consider logging a warning every time you run into (either via get or set) a "set" deprecated key. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-352-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 17:00:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45686 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 17:00:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 17:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 98887 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98851 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98840 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:01:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:01:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5BA29A0023 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <532291399.1247763675127.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6120: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6120.patch Attaching a patch that's identical to Sharad's last patch, except that Avro is now retrieved from the Maven repo. This should now hopefully pass Hudson tests. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-353-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 17:00:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45703 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 17:00:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 17:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 99013 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98977 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98967 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 17:01:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:01:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E528D29A0011 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1218210590.1247763674937.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6120: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > I don't see encoder/decoder has close() method. Am I missing something? No, it seems Avro is. I think the contract for serializers and deserializers is that they can close the underlying stream. So, until we add Encoder/Decoder#close() to Avro, we should explicitly save a pointer to the stream passed in and close it after flushing the encoder/decoder. A few other comments. - AvroSerialization should be public, since public classes extend it. - Every public or protected method and field in public classes should have javadoc, unless its inherited. - We should add a bit more documentation at the package and class level about how this is to be used, e.g., explain that reflect serialization will work for any class that's either in the configured package list or that implements the tag interface, and that specific serialization will just work for generated classes. - Is there any reason not to add these serializers to io.serializations by default? > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 17:02:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46721 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 17:02:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 17:02:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2491 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:03:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2452 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 17:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2439 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 17:03:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:03:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:03:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F2E234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1851467476.1247763794845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6120: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Marking as "Patch Available" to see if Hudson can now find Avro. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 19:03:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11045 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 19:03:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 19:03:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 25649 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:04:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25563 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25531 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 19:04:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:04:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:04:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355FF29A0011 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1959763833.1247771055217.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732088#action_12732088 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413707/HADOOP-6120.patch against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 261 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 260 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/576/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/576/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/576/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/576/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/576/console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 19:25:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20820 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 19:25:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 19:25:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 54986 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54955 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54940 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 19:26:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:26:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E780729A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <570309215.1247772374947.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6120: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Everything passed but the release audit. Not bad. The "release audit warnings" link above is broken, but the offending file is avroRecord.avsc. We should be able to put an Apache license at top of that file, since Jackson, the JSON parser that Avro uses, permits C-style comments. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 19:37:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26658 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 19:37:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 19:37:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 75307 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75265 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74960 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 19:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32C429A0013 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1828549601.1247773094995.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6148.txt Attached is an updated patch. The changes here from the previous version: - Replaced the implementation with the NewInner version by Scott. - Cleaned up the Performance Test a bit and included it as a static inner class of TestPureJavaCrc32 - it can be run using java 'org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest' - The patch also includes changes to ChecksumFileSystem and util.DataChecksum Note that I did not move the test out of src/test/core - it looks like src/test/core still exists in the common repository - all of the tests for common are still in there. As for testing, I reran the unit test, temporarily modified to do several million trials and it passed. I also ran TestChecksumFileSystem and it passed. I re-ran the performance test and made sure it was consistent with the results we've been seeing all along. After this is committed, there will be a small patch to HDFS and a small patch to MapReduce to sub out PureJavaCrc32 for java.util.zip.CRC32. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 19:41:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28257 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 19:41:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 19:41:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 78950 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:42:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78865 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 19:42:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78547 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 19:42:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:42:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42181234C044 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1314387060.1247773335269.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 21:55:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84484 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 21:55:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 21:55:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 78401 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 21:56:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78363 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 21:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78352 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 21:56:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:56:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACC6234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1181794958.1247781374819.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5864) Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-5864: ------------------------------------ Attachment: findbugs3.hdfs.patch After project split, the change made to findbugExcludeFile.xml is missing in the HDFS subproject. Attaching a patch to introduce the change again. > Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: findBugs.patch, findBugs1.patch, findBugs2.patch, findbugs3.hdfs.patch > > > This issue is to fix the following findbugs: > DMI in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.INodeDirectory.getExistingPathINodes(byte[][], INode[]) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.linkBlocks(File, File, int) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createBlockWriteStreams(File, File) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.getTmpInputStreams(Block, long, long) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ContextFactory.setAttributes() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:33:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1455 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:33:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:33:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 20768 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20730 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20716 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:34:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08600234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <263502489.1247783655020.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732210#action_12732210 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6148: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413728/hadoop-6148.txt against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/577/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/577/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/577/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/577/console This message is automatically generated. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:33:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1517 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:33:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 20890 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20811 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20792 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:34:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:34:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:34:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B1829A001D for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <365169664.1247783655169.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6155) deprecate Record IO MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org deprecate Record IO ------------------- Key: HADOOP-6155 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6155 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: record Reporter: Owen O'Malley With the advent of Avro, I think we should deprecate Record IO. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:35:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2369 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:35:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:35:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 23318 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:36:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23256 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:36:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23237 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:36:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:36:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:36:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E053929A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <388230924.1247783774918.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6156) Move map/reduce specific classes out of common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Move map/reduce specific classes out of common ---------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6156 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6156 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: util Reporter: Owen O'Malley Move Sort functions, process tree, and memory calculator classes out of Common and into Map/Reduce. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:39:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3879 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:39:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 33853 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33824 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33794 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:40:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA14E29A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2120909175.1247784014892.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6157) Deprecate the Daemon class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Deprecate the Daemon class -------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6157 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6157 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: util Reporter: Owen O'Malley The Daemon class has very little value and should be deprecated and then removed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:47:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5181 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:47:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 42983 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42942 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42932 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:48:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:48:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:48:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83B629A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1823292187.1247784494884.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732218#action_12732218 ] Kan Zhang commented on HADOOP-6132: ----------------------------------- The manual verification I used was running a test that involves the RPC layer (e.g., a test that uses the MiniDFSCluster), with log level of ipc.Server set to debug. Without this patch, one would observe the following line in the log, which means the client is establishing a connection for the VersionedProtocol. It happens whenever a client sets up the first connection for a protocol (e.g., ClientProtocol or DatanodeProtocol). When the bug is fixed, no connection for the VersionedProtocol should ever be set up. Hence, no such log messages should have been observed in the log. {noformat} 2009-07-16 15:41:37,763 DEBUG ipc.Server (Server.java:readAndProcess(861)) - Successfully authorized org.apache.hadoop.ipc.VersionedProtocol-...... {noformat} > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:55:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6363 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:55:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:55:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 47987 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47951 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47939 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EF1234C044 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2041057326.1247784974936.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6158) Move CyclicIteration to HDFS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Move CyclicIteration to HDFS ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6158 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6158 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: util Reporter: Owen O'Malley I think we should move CyclicIteration from Common utils to HDFS. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:55:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6409 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:55:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 48101 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48022 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48003 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96B629A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1789331991.1247784974955.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6148.txt Attached is a slightly updated patch which fixes the javadoc warning (there was an @inheritDoc on a constructor, which isn't allowed) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:55:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6403 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:55:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 48100 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48024 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48002 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A7929A001F for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1532138457.1247784975104.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:55:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6606 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:55:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:55:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 49063 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49025 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49015 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:56:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:56:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8CE29A002D for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <514903313.1247784975456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:57:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6904 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:57:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:57:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 50086 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50017 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49702 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:58:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBE3234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <175487592.1247785095033.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5864) Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732228#action_12732228 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5864: ------------------------------------------------ The changed was committed by Hairong before. We should investigate why the change disappeared. > Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: findBugs.patch, findBugs1.patch, findBugs2.patch, findbugs3.hdfs.patch > > > This issue is to fix the following findbugs: > DMI in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.INodeDirectory.getExistingPathINodes(byte[][], INode[]) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.linkBlocks(File, File, int) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createBlockWriteStreams(File, File) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.getTmpInputStreams(Block, long, long) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ContextFactory.setAttributes() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 22:57:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7072 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 22:57:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 22:57:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 50291 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50261 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50247 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 22:58:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:58:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:58:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAE729A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <762347884.1247785095124.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5864) Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732229#action_12732229 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5864: ------------------------------------------------ The changed was committed by Hairong before. We should investigate why the change disappeared. > Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: findBugs.patch, findBugs1.patch, findBugs2.patch, findbugs3.hdfs.patch > > > This issue is to fix the following findbugs: > DMI in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.INodeDirectory.getExistingPathINodes(byte[][], INode[]) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.linkBlocks(File, File, int) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createBlockWriteStreams(File, File) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.getTmpInputStreams(Block, long, long) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ContextFactory.setAttributes() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 23:35:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21884 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 23:35:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 23:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 95776 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 23:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95715 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 23:36:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95498 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 23:36:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:36:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:36:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D447D234C044 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1326160022.1247787374868.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6159) Remove "core" from build.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove "core" from build.xml ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6159 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6159 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE build.xml still creating "core" directories and other stuffs such as {code} ... {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 16 23:43:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23238 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2009 23:43:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2009 23:43:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5179 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 23:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5140 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2009 23:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5130 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2009 23:44:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:44:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:44:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14C7234C045 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <864618968.1247787854856.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6138: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: He Yongqiang Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. Does anyone know why we got "-1 release audit."? > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-373-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 01:00:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46818 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 01:00:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 01:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 62637 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:01:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62598 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62584 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 01:01:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:01:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60FD29A0012 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1482299059.1247792477679.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:01:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: util Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] {code} diff --git a/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ChecksumFileSystem.java b/src/java/... index 72a09bd..6f9701e 100644 --- a/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ChecksumFileSystem.java +++ b/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ChecksumFileSystem.java {code} There are "a" and "b" directories in the patch. Hudson probably cannot handle it. +1 Patch looks good other than that. > BTW, the path for TestPureJavaCrc32 is wrong in the previous patch. We don't have "core" directory anymore. I was wrong about it. We still have "core" for the tests. See also HADOOP-6159. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 01:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49565 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 01:10:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 01:10:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 68079 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68037 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68026 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 01:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:11:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5FC234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1391540205.1247793074835.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6148.txt Woops! Forgot to do --no-prefix on my git-diff. Same patch, just without the a/ and b/ prefixes. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 01:43:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74511 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 01:43:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 01:43:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 1150 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1110 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 01:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1099 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 01:44:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:44:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:44:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03FD234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1677647803.1247795054838.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732298#action_12732298 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6148: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413763/hadoop-6148.txt against trunk revision 793987. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/578/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/578/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/578/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/578/console This message is automatically generated. > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 02:07:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88291 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 02:07:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 02:07:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 18089 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 02:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18052 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 02:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18041 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 02:08:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB141234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1002817233.1247796494827.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. In-Reply-To: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6142: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed this. Thanks, Mahadev > archives relative path changes in common. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mahadev konar > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6142.patch > > > HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 02:19:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91588 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 02:19:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 02:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 20026 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19989 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19979 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 02:20:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F4C29A0016 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <208333450.1247797215137.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:20:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Todd and Scott! > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 03:49:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13943 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 03:49:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 03:49:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 69905 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 03:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69863 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 03:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69844 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 03:50:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:50:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:50:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F25234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1561768311.1247802614801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:50:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732327#action_12732327 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6132: -------------------------------------- +1 for the fix. There is another instance of use of getDelaringClass() in the same file (though that part of the code is not used except in some tests). We need to fix that. > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 04:28:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18995 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 04:28:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 04:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 81936 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 04:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81893 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 04:29:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81881 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 04:29:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:29:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:29:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AAA234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <934162556.1247804954848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jothi Padmanabhan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4927) Part files on the output filesystem are created irrespective of whether the corresponding task has anything to write there MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jothi Padmanabhan updated HADOOP-4927: -------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-4927-y20.patch Patch for the Y! 20 distribution. > Part files on the output filesystem are created irrespective of whether the corresponding task has anything to write there > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4927 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4927 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jothi Padmanabhan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-4927-v1.patch, hadoop-4927-v2.patch, hadoop-4927-v3.patch, hadoop-4927-v4.patch, hadoop-4927-v5.patch, hadoop-4927-v6.patch, hadoop-4927-y20.patch, hadoop-4927.patch > > > When OutputFormat.getRecordWriter is invoked, a part file is created on the output filesystem. But the created RecordWriter is not used until the OutputCollector.collect call is made by the task (user's code). This results in empty part files even if the OutputCollector.collect is never invoked by the corresponding tasks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 05:23:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28035 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 05:23:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 05:23:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 3337 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 05:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3297 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 05:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3287 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 05:24:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:24:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE92F234C004 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1802549969.1247808254831.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:24:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas reassigned HADOOP-6148: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Scott Carey (was: Todd Lipcon) > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Scott Carey > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 09:04:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27425 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 09:04:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 09:04:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 49230 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:05:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49191 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49181 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 09:05:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:05:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25662234C051 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1678953847.1247821515152.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:05:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "rahul k singh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732420#action_12732420 ] rahul k singh commented on HADOOP-6105: --------------------------------------- The first comment defines the initial proposal , Which says that when both new and old values are set in configuration we give preference to new values. This we felt is not correct , we should give preference to old value.As we are trying to be backward compatible here. So in configuration if have both deprecated key and new key , new key's values would be replaced by the deprecated key's values. Now in taking the above consideration in mind we have 2 ways of solving this. 1.Try to maintain a single set of key value always .When we have both deprecated key and new key , only maintain new key .So when we are trying to read the Configuration xmls , if we encounter any deprecated key , we simply replace new key's value with the deprecated key's value. when we do "set" in configuration for the depercated keys, we simply set the new key's with the values passed . When we do "get" we simply return the new key mapping. 2. Always give preference to the deprecated key . While set of new values check if deprecated keys are present , if yes , then simply set deprecated values. We would like to go ahead with option 1. Where we make sure that old is preferred at the start while loading the configuration , after that it is simply the whichever key is set recently. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 09:34:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39358 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 09:34:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 09:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 97996 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:35:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97914 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97865 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 09:35:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:35:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF63E234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <824935473.1247823314901.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6120_v5.patch Implemented AvroSerialization#close, added more javadoc, made AvroSerialization as public. bq. Is there any reason not to add these serializers to io.serializations by default? I didn't add considering JavaSerialization also not there in default. But I think its ok to have these. Added both Avro and java serializations to core-default.xml and SerializationFactory. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 09:36:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40211 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 09:36:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 09:36:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 403 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 363 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:37:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 348 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 09:37:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:37:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24E0234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <598490270.1247823434847.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 09:52:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48635 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 09:52:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 09:52:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 11375 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11334 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 09:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11324 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 09:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:53:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8D0234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1470136567.1247824395379.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:53:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732440#action_12732440 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- JavaSerialization was written more to demonstrate the generality of the abstraction (HADOOP-1986) than to be used in real-world applications, since its performance is considerably less than Writables (and presumably Avro). So I would be inclined not to add it to the default list, preferring users to explicitly enable it. Does this sound reasonable? > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 10:14:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59003 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 10:14:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 10:14:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 43063 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43023 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42951 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 10:15:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:15:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:15:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E996E234C045 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:15:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1694178380.1247825714955.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:15:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-5935) Hudson's release audit warnings link is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reopened HADOOP-5935: ------------------------------- Looks like this change was lost during the project split. See link in HADOOP-6138 for example. > Hudson's release audit warnings link is broken > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5935 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5935 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: hudson > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5935.patch > > > For example, on HADOOP-5170 the link http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/392/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt gives a 404. This makes it hard to work out which file or files are causing a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 10:16:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60176 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 10:16:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 10:16:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 45463 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:17:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45425 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45414 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 10:17:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:17:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:17:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB582234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1621177109.1247825834828.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:17:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732447#action_12732447 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6138: ----------------------------------- Looks like it was jdiff, which shouldn't really be checked by RAT. (Correct link is http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/575/artifact/trunk/patchprocess/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt, see also HADOOP-5935.) > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 10:20:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62021 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 10:20:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 10:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 51764 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:21:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51726 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:21:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51716 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 10:21:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:21:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:21:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D917B234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1831580547.1247826074884.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6146: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 10:38:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68177 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 10:38:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 10:38:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 79892 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79853 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 10:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79828 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 10:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:39:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0771234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1081086164.1247827154970.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "rahul k singh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732453#action_12732453 ] rahul k singh commented on HADOOP-6105: --------------------------------------- To make the above proposals more clear: for example: ========== A (a deprecated key) B(new key mapping for A) , SA (setValueForA) , SB(setValueForB) , GA(get("A)) GB(get("B")). 1. Always maintain new keys only. At the time of loading configuration xml , if A and B are present , we simply , replace B's values with A's value. * Advantages with this approach: ** The whole system is consistent. we always maintain the single set of values , hence whole behavior is deterministic w.r.t SA or SB which ever is called latest. * Disadvantage: ** Deprecated values would be over written. so if we call SB then A's values are also changed. //Is this a issue?? 2.Always give preference to deprecated keys. If we have both A and B present in configuration , give preference to A always. * Advantage: ** System is deterministic as we always get deprecated value if present. * Disadvantage: ** GB would check if GA is available and if yes , would return the A's values.So if user calls SB , and then calls GB , they would expect B's values, instead they would get A's value Any comments ? > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:02:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75192 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:02:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:02:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 15750 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:03:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15712 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15702 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:03:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D377D234C045 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1675092760.1247828594854.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732459#action_12732459 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413792/6120_v5.patch against trunk revision 795028. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/579/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/579/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/579/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/579/console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:10:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77194 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:10:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:10:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 25224 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25186 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25169 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CB6234C1E7 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <939464689.1247829076932.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6148) Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732465#action_12732465 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6148: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #29 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/29/]) . Implement a fast, pure Java CRC32 calculator which outperforms java.util.zip.CRC32. Contributed by Todd Lipcon and Scott Carey > Implement a pure Java CRC32 calculator > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6148 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6148 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Scott Carey > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: benchmarks20090714.txt, benchmarks20090715.txt, crc32-results.txt, hadoop-5598-evil.txt, hadoop-5598-hybrid.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-5598.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hadoop-6148.txt, hdfs-297.txt, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32.java, PureJavaCrc32New.java, PureJavaCrc32NewInner.java, PureJavaCrc32NewLoop.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestCrc32Performance.java, TestPureJavaCrc32.java > > > We've seen a reducer writing 200MB to HDFS with replication = 1 spending a long time in crc calculation. In particular, it was spending 5 seconds in crc calculation out of a total of 6 for the write. I suspect that it is the java-jni border that is causing us grief. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77254 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:10:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:10:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 25340 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25313 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25290 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5445D234C4AA for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <383406953.1247829077344.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6142) archives relative path changes in common. In-Reply-To: <1194201800.1247266034972.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732467#action_12732467 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6142: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #29 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/29/]) . Update documentation and use of harchives for relative paths added in MAPREDUCE-739. Contributed by Mahadev Konar > archives relative path changes in common. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6142 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6142 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assignee: Mahadev konar > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6142.patch > > > HADOOP-3663 was moved to mapreduce accidentally. Opening this jira to upload my chanegs to common --- changes are rleated to MAPREDUCE-739. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:10:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77312 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:10:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:10:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 25421 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25383 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25373 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:11:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:11:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE0234C055 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1988943968.1247829076813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:11:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732464#action_12732464 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6146: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #29 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/29/]) . Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1. > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:26:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80651 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:26:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:26:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 42496 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42459 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42448 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B74234C045 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run over the entire release binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org releaseaudit (rats) should not be run over the entire release binary -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6160 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:26:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80686 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:26:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:26:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 42635 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42537 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42516 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAF1234C04C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2109787534.1247830035186.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run over the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan reassigned HADOOP-6160: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run over the entire release binary > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 11:26:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80835 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 11:26:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 11:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 43481 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43440 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43430 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 11:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306AA234C052 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1717017862.1247830035197.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6160: --------------------------------------- Summary: releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary (was: releaseaudit (rats) should not be run over the entire release binary) > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 15:37:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7256 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 15:37:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 15:37:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5767 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 15:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5734 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 15:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5724 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 15:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60C0234C045 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1225103000.1247845094805.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732579#action_12732579 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------------------- use the rat anttask to configure rats to run against the specific directory. I'm thinking of excluding the following dirs/files for releaseaudit. build/hadoop-core-0.21.0-dev/CHANGES.txt build/hadoop-core-0.21.0-dev/docs build/hadoop-core-0.21.0-dev/lib/jdiff > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 15:55:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13404 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 15:55:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 15:55:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 25973 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 15:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25934 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 15:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25923 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 15:56:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:56:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67D4234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <138493939.1247846174870.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6134) New Hadoop Common Site In-Reply-To: <1659559291.1247095875988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6134: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Corinne Chandel Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Corinne! > New Hadoop Common Site > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6134 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Assignee: Corinne Chandel > Attachments: Hadoop-6134.patch > > > New Hadoop Common Site > Set up site, initial pass. > May need to add more content. > May need to update some links. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 17:40:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56531 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 17:40:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 17:40:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 47049 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 17:41:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47010 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 17:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47000 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 17:41:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:41:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:41:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7717234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1429051737.1247852474802.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732626#action_12732626 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6138: ------------------------------------------------ Thanks Tom for the info. No new tests needed because the changes is simple. I will commit this soon. > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 18:03:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71777 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 18:03:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 18:03:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 87207 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87161 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86916 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 18:04:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:04:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B35234C055 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1109690120.1247853854919.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6138: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: fs Description: Eliminate the deprecated warnings introduced by HADOOP-5438. Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > > Eliminate the deprecated warnings introduced by HADOOP-5438. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 18:05:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73123 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 18:05:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 18:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 90776 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90749 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90739 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 18:06:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0555D234C051 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <160089176.1247853975020.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6138: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Yongqiang! > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > > Eliminate the deprecated warnings introduced by HADOOP-5438. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 20:11:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31239 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 20:11:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 20:11:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 71361 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 20:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71323 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 20:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71313 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 20:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA6D234C045 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <582258206.1247861534898.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732716#action_12732716 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- Sigh. I just reallized this is really fragile, since we don't permit one to specify a different schema to read things. We need to get metadata from the serializer used to write data to the deserializer used to deserialize it. For even Writable, we should check that the data was indeed written with WritableSerializer, since folks can configure a given class to be serialized in different ways. So we might add methods like: - Deserializer Serialization#getDeserializer(Map meta); - Serializer Serialization#getSerializer(Map meta); - Map Serializer#getMeta(); And alter, e.g. SequenceFile and other containers to use these. Perhaps this belongs in another Jira, but without it we're missing out on a lot of Avro's functionality. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 17 21:26:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74710 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 21:26:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 83651 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 21:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83590 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 21:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83570 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 21:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:27:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89F4234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1133905064.1247866034808.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732743#action_12732743 ] Kan Zhang commented on HADOOP-6132: ----------------------------------- > There is another instance of use of getDelaringClass() in the same file Yes, it is used in a public static convenience method whereby users can make a call by passing only the method. Unless we want to change the interface contract and require the user to pass the protocol as well, we have to use getDeclaringClass() to figure out the protocol. I'm not sure what the original purpose of this interface was. But I feel it serves some purpose (as long as users are aware of the twist of using getDeclaringClass()) and since it is only used in tests, I don't feel making the changes in this patch. What do you think? > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 01:49:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66548 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 01:49:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 01:49:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 69006 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 01:50:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68968 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 01:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68958 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 01:50:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:50:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:50:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF890234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <236654617.1247881814836.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:50:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-5879: ---------------------------------- Assignee: He Yongqiang Status: Open (was: Patch Available) The latest patch looks good. A few notes: * BuiltInZlibDeflater can use the setLevel and setStrategy methods on java.util.zip.Deflater to implement reset * This should definitely have a unit test, particularly involving CodecPool * The javadoc for reinit should describe the contract for that method; the implementations should also describe what happens for that particular codec. * In ZlibCompression::reinit, shouldn't end() be called before reconfiguring the codec? * The direct buffer size should not be reconfigured. Codecs are pooled because recreating direct buffers is very expensive; allocating new direct buffers on a cache hit defeats the purpose of pooling them. The buffer size doesn't affect correctness of zlib compression. * This should add methods like ZlibCompression::setCompressionLevel(Configuration, ) to set the {{zlib.compress.*}} properties > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 03:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2738 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 03:47:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 03:47:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 9422 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 03:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9382 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 03:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9367 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 03:48:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:48:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:48:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8219234C044 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1767828979.1247888894812.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732833#action_12732833 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------------- Whoops; ZlibCompression isn't a class. Maybe setCompressionLevel(conf, value) should be added to GzipCodec instead. > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 11:15:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22103 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 11:15:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 11:15:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 55662 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 11:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55617 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 11:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55607 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 11:16:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:16:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:16:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E116F234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1897231587.1247915774907.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6138) eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 In-Reply-To: <883885751.1247164334967.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732879#action_12732879 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6138: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #30 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/30/]) . Eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438. Contributed by He Yongqiang > eliminate the depracate warnings introduced by H-5438 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6138-2009-07-15.patch > > > Eliminate the deprecated warnings introduced by HADOOP-5438. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 14:35:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85965 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 14:35:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 14:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 47611 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 14:36:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47571 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 14:36:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47556 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 14:36:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:36:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:36:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88DD234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <795653157.1247927774816.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5879-7-18-3.patch A new patch incorporates Chris' comments (Thanks, Chirs!). > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch, hadoop-5879-7-18-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:03:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82724 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:03:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:03:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 74594 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74554 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74536 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:04:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:04:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6609234C045 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add get/setEnum to Configuration -------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Reporter: Chris Douglas Priority: Minor It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:05:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83201 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:05:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:05:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 76635 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76592 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76582 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7D1234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <763325377.1247958375036.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration In-Reply-To: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6161: ---------------------------------- Attachment: C6161-0.patch > Add get/setEnum to Configuration > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: C6161-0.patch > > > It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:05:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83218 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:05:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:05:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 76711 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76669 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76655 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:06:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A1F234C046 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1850200318.1247958375075.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration In-Reply-To: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6161: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Chris Douglas Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add get/setEnum to Configuration > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: C6161-0.patch > > > It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:25:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85987 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:25:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:25:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 81622 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:26:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81584 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:26:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81574 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:26:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:26:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:26:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58D4234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43626980.1247959574804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration In-Reply-To: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732942#action_12732942 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6161: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413934/C6161-0.patch against trunk revision 795172. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/580/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/580/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/580/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/580/console This message is automatically generated. > Add get/setEnum to Configuration > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: C6161-0.patch > > > It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:39:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87550 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:39:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:39:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 84333 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84293 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84283 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:40:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:40:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:40:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC72C234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1464038677.1247960414823.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732943#action_12732943 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------------- Thanks for updating the patch * Rather than having special semantics for construct, I'd suggest removing the directBufferSize formal from construct and returning the allocation to the constructor * Sorry, my last comment was not clear. By "implementations should also describe..." I meant that the classes implementing reinit should include a description of what it effects in its javadoc for reinit, as you did in BuiltInZlibDeflater. I didn't mean that more logging was required. Compressor::reinit should also describe the contract for future implementers, "Prepare the compressor to be used in a new stream with settings defined in the given Configuration" or something like that * I think it's appropriate to fail if the configuration is invalid rather than taking the default in ZlibFactory::getCompression\* (why ZlibFactory?). I don't think the getDefault\* methods are necessary. setCompression\* should take the appropriate enum, rather than String. Filed HADOOP-6161 for get/setEnum to simplify some of the conf-related code * In ZlibCompressor::reinit, reset is not called if the Configuration is null. For users calling these methods not via CodecPool, reset() should probably be called * CompressionLevel::compressionLevel() and CompressionStrategy::compressionStrategy() should remain package-private; the integers are implementation details * The unit test doesn't really verify the functionality added by this patch, save that it doesn't throw exceptions. That said, it would be hard to verify that this is working as expected without adding get\* methods to ZlibCompressor. Can you describe how you verified the patch's correctness, both for the native and non-native codecs? > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch, hadoop-5879-7-18-3.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:57:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91281 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:57:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:57:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 95541 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95502 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95492 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CDB234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <917138917.1247961494880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5732) SFTP FileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-5732: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > SFTP FileSystem > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Environment: Any environment > Reporter: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.pa= tch, HADOOP-5732.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patc= h > > Original Estimate: 0h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > I have implemented a FileSystem that supports SFTP. It uses JSch (http://= www.jcraft.com/jsch/) in order to manage SFTP. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:57:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91289 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:57:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:57:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 95607 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95569 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95548 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88BC234C056 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <353381511.1247961494951.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5732) SFTP FileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-5732: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Running patch through hudson > SFTP FileSystem > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Environment: Any environment > Reporter: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.pa= tch, HADOOP-5732.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patc= h > > Original Estimate: 0h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > I have implemented a FileSystem that supports SFTP. It uses JSch (http://= www.jcraft.com/jsch/) in order to manage SFTP. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 18 23:57:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91357 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2009 23:57:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 23:57:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 95674 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95636 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95626 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2009 23:58:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AE2234C1EC for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1276682894.1247961494985.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-5732) SFTP FileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas reassigned HADOOP-5732: ------------------------------------- Assignee: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > SFTP FileSystem > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Environment: Any environment > Reporter: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Assignee: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.pa= tch, HADOOP-5732.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patc= h > > Original Estimate: 0h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > I have implemented a FileSystem that supports SFTP. It uses JSch (http://= www.jcraft.com/jsch/) in order to manage SFTP. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 00:07:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94499 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 00:07:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 00:07:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 222 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 00:08:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 179 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 00:08:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 169 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 00:08:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:08:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BB4234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1704850204.1247962094804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5732) SFTP FileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D127= 32947#action_12732947 ]=20 Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-5732: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment=20 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12411419/HADOOP-5732.patc= h against trunk revision 795172. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tes= ts. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of java= c compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to cause Findbugs to fail. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number= of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.= apache.org/581/testReport/ Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-= vesta.apache.org/581/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vest= a.apache.org/581/console This message is automatically generated. > SFTP FileSystem > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Environment: Any environment > Reporter: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Assignee: =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Goiri > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.patch, HADOOP-5732.pa= tch, HADOOP-5732.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patch, ivy-for-hadoop-7532.patc= h > > Original Estimate: 0h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > I have implemented a FileSystem that supports SFTP. It uses JSch (http://= www.jcraft.com/jsch/) in order to manage SFTP. --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 04:53:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67585 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 04:53:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 04:53:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 39400 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 04:54:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39362 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 04:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39352 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 04:54:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:54:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:54:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EA5234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1124983580.1247979254943.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:54:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6143) FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs In-Reply-To: <636161787.1247269154845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6143: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) {noformat} - Returns 0 on success and -1 on error.

+ Returns 0 on success , and >0 if an error occurs.

{noformat} Rather than test- or care- whether other platforms return -1, I would prefer "nonzero on error" or more symmetrically, "nonzero on failure". > FS shell commands returns incorrect exit code when error occurs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6143 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6143 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Attachments: HADOOP-6143.patch > > > HDFS documentation ( http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_shell.html#du ) mentions that > {noformat} > Exit Code: > Returns 0 on success and -1 on error. > {noformat} > Current Fs shell behavior is buggy with this agreement. > {code} > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -ls foo > ls: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -lsr foo > lsr: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -du foo > du: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -dus foo > dus: Cannot access foo: No such file or directory. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -cp foo f2 > cp: File does not exist: foo > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyToLocal foo f2 > copyToLocal: null > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ bin/hadoop fs -copyFromLocal foo f2 > copyFromLocal: File foo does not exist. > statepick-lm:Hadoop rphulari$ echo $? > 255 > {code} > In all above cases exit code on error should be -1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 05:23:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73698 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 05:23:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 05:23:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 47137 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 05:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47046 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 05:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47027 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 05:24:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:24:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:24:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0142C234C055 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1618049917.1247981055004.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-6162) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas moved MAPREDUCE-738 to HADOOP-6162: ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6162 (was: MAPREDUCE-738) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop Map/Reduce) > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6129.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 05:25:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74488 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 05:25:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 05:25:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 47465 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47428 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47418 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 05:26:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4253234C044 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <706365959.1247981174789.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6162) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732972#action_12732972 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6162: --------------------------------------- On second thought, this issue should be in common; the MapFileOutputFormat changes can be moved to a MR issue. > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6129.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 21:13:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47616 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 21:13:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 21:13:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 33254 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:14:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33210 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:14:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33200 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 21:14:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:14:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:14:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190A0234C044 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <940132753.1248038055097.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:14:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4010) Chaging LineRecordReader algo so that it does not need to skip backwards in the stream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-4010: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 4010-mapreduce.patch The changes to mapred.LineRecordReader should have been propagated to mapreduce.lib.input.LineRecordReader > Chaging LineRecordReader algo so that it does not need to skip backwards in the stream > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 4010-mapreduce.patch, Hadoop-4010.patch, Hadoop-4010_version2.patch, Hadoop-4010_version3.patch > > > The current algorithm of the LineRecordReader needs to move backwards in the stream (in its constructor) to correctly position itself in the stream. So it moves back one byte from the start of its split and try to read a record (i.e. a line) and throws that away. This is so because it is sure that, this line would be taken care of by some other mapper. This algorithm is difficult and in-efficient if used for compressed stream where data is coming to the LineRecordReader via some codecs. (Although in the current implementation, Hadoop does not split a compressed file and only makes one split from the start to the end of the file and so only one mapper handles it. We are currently working on BZip2 codecs where splitting is possible to work with Hadoop. So this proposed change will make it possible to uniformly handle plain as well as compressed stream.) > In the new algorithm, each mapper always skips its first line because it is sure that, that line would have been read by some other mapper. So now each mapper must finish its reading at a record boundary which is always beyond its upper split limit. Due to this change, LineRecordReader does not need to move backwards in the stream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 21:15:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48031 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 21:15:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 21:15:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 33892 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:16:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33850 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33830 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 21:16:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:16:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:16:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8AD29A0014 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1313832882.1248038175177.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:16:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-4010) Chaging LineRecordReader algo so that it does not need to skip backwards in the stream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas reopened HADOOP-4010: ----------------------------------- > Chaging LineRecordReader algo so that it does not need to skip backwards in the stream > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4010 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4010 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Abdul Qadeer > Assignee: Abdul Qadeer > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 4010-mapreduce.patch, Hadoop-4010.patch, Hadoop-4010_version2.patch, Hadoop-4010_version3.patch > > > The current algorithm of the LineRecordReader needs to move backwards in the stream (in its constructor) to correctly position itself in the stream. So it moves back one byte from the start of its split and try to read a record (i.e. a line) and throws that away. This is so because it is sure that, this line would be taken care of by some other mapper. This algorithm is difficult and in-efficient if used for compressed stream where data is coming to the LineRecordReader via some codecs. (Although in the current implementation, Hadoop does not split a compressed file and only makes one split from the start to the end of the file and so only one mapper handles it. We are currently working on BZip2 codecs where splitting is possible to work with Hadoop. So this proposed change will make it possible to uniformly handle plain as well as compressed stream.) > In the new algorithm, each mapper always skips its first line because it is sure that, that line would have been read by some other mapper. So now each mapper must finish its reading at a record boundary which is always beyond its upper split limit. Due to this change, LineRecordReader does not need to move backwards in the stream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 21:47:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61777 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 21:47:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 21:47:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 50343 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50304 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50289 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:48:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:48:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F5129A001D for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <550759029.1248040095027.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:48:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6162) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Patterson updated HADOOP-6162: ------------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6129.patch) > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6162.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 19 21:47:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61859 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2009 21:47:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2009 21:47:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 50531 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50492 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50477 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2009 21:48:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:48:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:48:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B0D234C044 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1227594242.1248040094864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin Patterson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6162) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Patterson updated HADOOP-6162: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6162.patch Here's another patch that works with the new (divided) file structure and includes a unit test to prove that it works. > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6162.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 05:03:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25864 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 05:03:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 05:03:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 13436 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 05:04:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13412 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 05:04:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13402 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 05:04:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:04:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:04:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA59D29A0011 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Progress class should provide an api if phases exist ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6163 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Ravi Gummadi Assignee: Ravi Gummadi Fix For: 0.21.0 Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 05:05:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26409 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 05:05:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 05:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14618 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 05:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14575 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 05:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14565 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 05:06:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:06:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:06:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D56234C044 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <290777667.1248066374873.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:06:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6163: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6163.patch Attaching patch that adds boolean phasesExist() method to Progress.java. Please review and provide your comments. > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 11:38:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69780 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 11:38:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 11:38:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 21019 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20975 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20964 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:39:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9C9234C055 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <186282748.1248089955390.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733194#action_12733194 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- bq. JavaSerialization was written more to demonstrate the generality of the abstraction I am fine removing JavaSerialization from the defaults, if folks think it will discourage people to use java serialization. bq. folks can configure a given class to be serialized in different ways. Do you mean that accept(Class c) should select serialization not only based on class but also based on the meta data passed ? We need to change accept as well, no ? bq. Perhaps this belongs in another Jira, but without it we're missing out on a lot of Avro's functionality. I think this can be discussed in another Jira, as the current implementation should be fine in case reader and writer are for same schema. We can start using this in mapreduce jobs. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 11:38:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69922 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 11:38:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 11:38:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 21929 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21891 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21881 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 11:39:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:39:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:39:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA38234C045 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <967301748.1248089955190.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5935) Hudson's release audit warnings link is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-5935. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed committed with the latest trunk code. > Hudson's release audit warnings link is broken > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5935 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5935 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: hudson > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5935.patch > > > For example, on HADOOP-5170 the link http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/392/artifact/trunk/current/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt gives a 404. This makes it hard to work out which file or files are causing a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 18:57:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87753 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 18:57:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 18:57:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 58920 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58881 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 18:58:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58811 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 18:58:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:58:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:58:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C869E234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <78432043.1248116294809.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration In-Reply-To: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733316#action_12733316 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6161: --------------------------------------- +1 > Add get/setEnum to Configuration > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Attachments: C6161-0.patch > > > It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 19:37:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2918 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 19:37:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 19:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 32996 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 19:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32948 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 19:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32938 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 19:38:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:38:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:38:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C0A234C1E6 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1169680547.1248118695006.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733331#action_12733331 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6120: -------------------------------------- If, e.g., a class both implements Writable and also either implements AvroReflectSerializeable or whose package is listed in the config, then which serialization is used is determined by the order of the serializers in the config, which could change. Similarly for the Serializeable interface and JavaSerialization. So its not safe to assume that the Class->Serialization map is fixed, and we should really be storing at least the serialization's name in container metadata, and probably also a version (e.g. serialVersionUID for JavaSerialization). And once we have a mechanism to support that, we can also store other metadata, like the schema, so that we can read older versions and generic data. +1 for removing JavaSerialization from the defaults. +1 for a separate Jira on serialization metadata. But it would be best to have such metadata by the 0.21 freeze, in two weeks. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 22:34:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19545 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 22:34:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 22:34:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 61358 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 22:35:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61316 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 22:35:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61306 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 22:35:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:35:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:35:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA23F234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <634330581.1248129314813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733381#action_12733381 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6132: -------------------------------------- sure. That is fine. If someone actually ends up using the interface, they will be similarly surprised. But for now I guess it is fine. If we want to fix it, we need to make the interface take class object as one of the arguments (since that is part of definition of what a connection is). +1. > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 20 23:00:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30587 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2009 23:00:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2009 23:00:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 89923 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 23:01:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89881 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2009 23:01:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89871 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2009 23:01:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:01:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:01:45 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3F234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468504763.1248130884915.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:01:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6161) Add get/setEnum to Configuration In-Reply-To: <666455284.1247958254877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6161: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed this and updated the core and core-test jars in HDFS and MAPREDUCE. > Add get/setEnum to Configuration > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Chris Douglas > Assignee: Chris Douglas > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: C6161-0.patch > > > It would be useful if Configuration had helper get/set methods for enumerated types. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 03:54:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27758 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 03:54:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 03:54:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 36697 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:55:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36657 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36647 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 03:55:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:55:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:55:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D99234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466254032.1248148514910.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 03:56:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27914 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 03:56:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 03:56:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 37343 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37302 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37292 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:57:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:57:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7B029A0022 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <843579526.1248148635128.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:57:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, 6120_v6.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 03:56:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27945 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 03:56:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 03:56:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 37409 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37369 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37359 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A9C234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1553647912.1248148634905.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- Attachment: 6120_v6.patch Removed JavaSerialization from defaults > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, 6120_v6.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 04:18:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31487 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 04:18:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 04:18:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 49608 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49565 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49553 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 04:19:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:19:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:19:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E27129A0016 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <344904807.1248149955057.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:19:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733466#action_12733466 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6120: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414061/6120_v6.patch against trunk revision 796052. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/582/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/582/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/582/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/582/console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, 6120_v6.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 04:24:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32193 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 04:24:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 04:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 51695 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:25:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51655 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:25:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51645 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 04:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:25:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0C9234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <274655062.1248150314878.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sreekanth Ramakrishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5488) HADOOP-2721 doesn't clean up descendant processes of a jvm that exits cleanly after running a task successfully MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sreekanth Ramakrishnan updated HADOOP-5488: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5488-ydist.patch Attaching patch for Yahoo distribution. > HADOOP-2721 doesn't clean up descendant processes of a jvm that exits cleanly after running a task successfully > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5488 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5488 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-5488-ydist.patch, HADOOP-5488.patch, HADOOP_5488_5614.patch, HADOOP_5488_5614.v1.2.patch, HADOOP_5488_5614.v1.3.patch, HADOOP_5488_5614.v1.patch, testcase5488.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 04:26:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32429 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 04:26:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 04:26:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 52310 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52269 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52194 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 04:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:27:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF90229A0018 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <214187820.1248150434914.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733470#action_12733470 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6120: ---------------------------------------- Test failure is unrelated. > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, 6120_v6.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 04:58:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37381 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 04:58:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 04:58:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 62457 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:59:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62417 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 04:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62405 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 04:59:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:59:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:59:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFFC234C044 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <887346771.1248152354838.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6140) DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch In-Reply-To: <1165046874.1247245875107.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733477#action_12733477 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on HADOOP-6140: ------------------------------------------------- path.separator bug is fixed by HADOOP-4864. > DistributedCache.addArchiveToClassPath doesn't work in 0.18.x branch > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6140 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6140 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Vladimir Klimontovich > Attachments: HADOOP-6140-ver4.patch > > > addArchiveToClassPath is a method of DistributedCache class. It should be called before running a task. It accepts path to a jar file on a DFS. After it > this method should put this jar file on sitribuuted cache and than add this file to classpath to each map/reduce process on job tracker. > This method didn't work. > Bug 1: > addArchiveToClassPath adds DFS-path to archive to mapred.job.classpath.archives property. It uses System.getProperty("path.separator") as delimiter of multiple path. > getFileClassPaths that is called from TaskRunner uses splits mapred.job.classpath.archives using System.getProperty("path.separator"). > In unix systems System.getProperty("path.separator") equals to ":". DFS-path urls is hdfs://host:port/path. It means that a result of split will be > [ hdfs,//host,port/path]. > Suggested solution: use "," instead of > Bug 2: > in TaskRunner there is an algorithm that looks for correspondence between DFS paths and local paths in distributed cache. > It compares > if (archives[i].getPath().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())){ > instead of > if (archives[i].toString().equals( > archiveClasspaths[j].toString())) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 08:31:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14130 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 08:31:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 08:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 43472 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43428 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43418 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:32:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4866B234C055 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46756721.1248165135295.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6150: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 08:31:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14142 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 08:31:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 08:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 43536 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43492 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43467 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:32:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:32:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEB7234C1E9 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1257415101.1248165135314.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6150: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Trivial patch that exposes an internal API to public. No unit test needed. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 09:29:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30057 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 09:29:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 09:29:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 94078 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:30:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93992 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93886 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 09:30:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:30:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:30:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2C0234C1E6 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <326979076.1248168614905.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6163: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6163.v1.patch Attaching new patch that checks if phases exist in phase() method and returns null if there are no phases in this Progress object instead of throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch, HADOOP-6163.v1.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 09:45:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38082 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 09:45:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 09:45:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 12493 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12449 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12435 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:46:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90EA234C044 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1195629918.1248169574809.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6163: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch, HADOOP-6163.v1.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 10:19:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57238 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 10:19:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 10:19:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 60417 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 10:20:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60390 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 10:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60369 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 10:20:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:20:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE418234C051 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1109553295.1248171614909.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733574#action_12733574 ] Ravi Gummadi commented on HADOOP-6163: -------------------------------------- ant tet-patch gave [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. This doesn't need a testcase as the testcase in MAPREDUCE-743 covers this code change. > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch, HADOOP-6163.v1.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 11:00:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69541 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 11:00:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 11:00:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2958 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 11:01:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2916 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 11:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2906 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 11:01:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:01:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:01:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC93F234C046 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <593290691.1248174075837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:01:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733588#action_12733588 ] Ravi Gummadi commented on HADOOP-6163: -------------------------------------- Unit tests passed on my local machine. > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch, HADOOP-6163.v1.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 21:32:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38147 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 21:32:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 21:32:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17725 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 21:33:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17686 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 21:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17676 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 21:33:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A4234C044 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53791890.1248211994862.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1257) a distributed junit test runner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733838#action_12733838 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-1257: -------------------------------------------- I'm slightly confused with this issue: is there a need for a special MR tests runner? Or this is all about a general unit test runner which will allow to speed up the testing process on the Hudson's side? I believe that it is important to make such a distinguish because it would influence the solution a lot. E.g. for a generic parallel execution we don't need any of MR pieces, proposed by the patch in the attachment (unless I've totally misunderstood its purpose) > a distributed junit test runner > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.12.3 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: HADOOP-1257.patch > > > It would be nice to have a distributed junit runner that would run 100 instances of each test a separate map, and use counters to count how many times each test passed/failed/hung. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 21 23:54:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84347 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2009 23:54:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 23:54:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 46576 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 23:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46535 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2009 23:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46525 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2009 23:55:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:55:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:55:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F9E29A0016 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6164 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Reporter: Jakob Homan As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 48. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 00:30:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97303 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 00:30:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 00:30:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 86910 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86870 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86860 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 00:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9434234C044 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <475960326.1248222674813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733919#action_12733919 ] Philip Zeyliger commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------- I think you have to think about how Hadoop's notion of a "final" flag interacts with this, too. If a system administrator has set either A or B to be final, then that value must override any user-submitted value, regardless of which was set first. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 00:54:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3512 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 00:54:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 00:54:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 98793 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 00:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98753 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 00:55:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98743 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 00:55:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:55:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:55:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C4234C044 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <887636184.1248224114806.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6164: -------------------------------- Description: As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. (was: As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 48. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw.) Fixed error in description in re: # of tests. Otherwise issue made no sense. > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 01:31:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16061 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 01:31:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 01:31:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24075 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 01:32:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24035 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 01:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24025 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 01:32:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:32:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:32:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFBB234C044 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1594585786.1248226334829.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:32:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1257) a distributed junit test runner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733942#action_12733942 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-1257: -------------------------------------------- Also, it seems like a possibility that parallel tests execution will be included into JUnit 4.7 (see HADOOP-4901 comments on that) > a distributed junit test runner > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.12.3 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: HADOOP-1257.patch > > > It would be nice to have a distributed junit runner that would run 100 instances of each test a separate map, and use counters to count how many times each test passed/failed/hung. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 06:05:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87774 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 06:05:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 06:05:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 46498 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 06:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46156 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 06:06:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46017 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 06:06:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:06:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78B629A001C for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <91935080.1248242775750.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:06:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734003#action_12734003 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6164: -------------------------------------------- test patch doesn make any decision on the no of tests run. If the tests fail it fails the build. It is hudson which parses the junit test results from the xml file. BTW hudson didnt run any core-test for HDFS-450 it failed for create-configure-c++ so didnt run test-core target so -1 for core test and hdfsproxy test failed so -1 for contrib test. test-patch script doesnt do any count on the no of test run. > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 06:11:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90775 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 06:11:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 06:11:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 52499 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 06:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52459 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 06:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52448 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 06:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE54429A0011 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <884612214.1248243134909.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-6164. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan Im closing this resolved invalid. This is how hudson works and this has nothing to do with the test-patch script. > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 11:24:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98978 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 11:24:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 11:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 50020 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:25:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49995 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:25:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49985 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 11:25:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:25:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C7F234C044 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1308804598.1248261914878.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6165) Add metadata to Serializations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add metadata to Serializations ------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6165 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6165 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: contrib/serialization Reporter: Tom White Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.21.0 The Serialization framework only allows a class to be passed as metadata. This assumes there is a one-to-one mapping between types and Serializations, which is overly restrictive. By permitting applications to pass arbitrary metadata to Serializations, they can get more control over which Serialization is used, and would also allow, for example, one to pass an Avro schema to an Avro Serialization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 11:44:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3028 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 11:44:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 11:44:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 86819 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86775 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86763 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9669E234C1EA for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1822663906.1248263115615.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734079#action_12734079 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4491: ----------------------------------- Broadly, there are two directory strucutres - system and users - system directory will be owned by mapreduce, thereby protecting the contents. - users is 755, owned by mapreduce - users/$jobid is clearly 700 and owned by the user. - system/$jobid/outputs can be directly $ttroot/ as was discussed offline. But I've left it inside system/$jobid as the $jobid directory seemed reduntant to me. In any case, the outputs once moved need to owned by the TT. - all of the files localized by the TT are written into system/$jobid - After job localization is done, all files under system/$jobid/userfiles are moved to users/$jobid to be consumed by the user's task and so owned by the user. - After task localization is done, the whole directory system/$jobid/$taskid is moved to users/$jobid/ and owned by the user. - when the task finishes, the whole users/$user/$jobid/$attemptid/output directory needs to be moved to outputs/$jobid/$attemptid. - cleaning up of a task is removal of users//$jobid/$attemptid - cleaning up a job is removal of users//$jobid, system/$jobid These changs will be needed for both DefaultTaskController as well as the LinuxTaskController. LinuxTaskController uses the setuid binary to do the move operations as the root and changing ownership of the target files to the user. Distributed cache files and the log files still need to be baked into this structure. > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 11:44:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3080 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 11:44:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 11:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 86894 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86854 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86844 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 11:45:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:45:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4FF234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1483627323.1248263114891.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734078#action_12734078 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4491: ----------------------------------- I had some offline discussions with Hemanth/Owen/Arun. Those discussions resulted in a change of proposal for this JIRA. The TaskTracker's directory structure will be like the following: {noformat} $ttroot | |- distcache | |- users | | | '-- $jobid | | | |- jars | | '-- job.jar | |- work | | | `-- $attemptid | |- job.xml | |- taskjvm.sh | |- work | | '-- tmp | `-- output | '-- system | `-- $jobid | |- job.xml | |- userfiles | |- jars | | '-- job.jar | '-- work | |- $attemptid | |- job.xml | |- taskjvm.sh | '-- work | '-- tmp | '-- outputs `-- $attemptid {noformat} > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 11:52:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4676 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 11:52:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 11:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 95201 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95162 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95152 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 11:53:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:53:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:53:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB0C234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1921850559.1248263594834.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6165) Add metadata to Serializations In-Reply-To: <1308804598.1248261914878.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6165: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6165.patch Here's a patch with some ideas about how to go about this. It is very preliminary. 1. One of the problems is that Serialization/Serializer/Deserializer are all interfaces, which makes it difficult to evolve them. One way to manage this is to introduce Base{Serialization,Serializer,Deserializer} abstract classes that implement the corresponding interface. SerializationFactory will read the io.serializations configuration property and if a serialization implements BaseSerialization it will use that directly, while if it is a (legacy) Serialization it will wrap it in a BaseSerialization. The trick here is to put legacy Serializations at the end, since they have less metadata and are therefore less discriminating. The Serialization/Serializer/Deserializer interfaces are all deprecated and can be removed in a future release, leaving only Base{Serialization,Serializer,Deserializer}. 2. In addition to the Map metadata do we need to keep the class metadata? That is, do we need public abstract boolean accept(Class c, Map metadata); or is the following sufficient? public abstract boolean accept(Map metadata); We could have a "class" entry in the map which stores this information, but we'd have to convert it to a Class object to do the isAssignableFrom check that some serializations need to do, e.g. Writable.class.isAssignableFrom(c). Perhaps this is OK. 3. Should we have a Metadata class to permit evolution of beyond Map? (E.g. to keep a Class property.) 4. Where does the metadata come from? In the context of MapReduce, the answer depends on the stage of MapReduce. (None of these changes have been implemented in the patch.) i. Map input The metadata comes from the container. For example, in SequenceFiles the metadata comes from the key-value class types, and the SequenceFile metadata (a Map, which is ideally suited for this scheme). To support this, SequenceFile.Reader would pass its metadata to the deserializer. Similarly, SequenceFile.Writer would add metadata from the BaseSerializer to the SequenceFile's writer. ii. Map output/Reduce input The metadata would have to be supplied by the MapReduce framework. Just like we have mapred.mapoutput.{key,value}.class, we could have properties to specify extra metadata. Metadata is a map, so something like mapred.mapoutput.{key,value}.metadata.K where K can be an arbitrary string. For example, one might define mapred.mapoutput.key.metadata.avroSchema to be the Avro schema for map output key types. To get this to work we would need support from Configuration to get a Map from a property prefix. So conf.getMap("mapred.mapoutput.key.metadata") would return a Map of all the properties under the mapred.mapoutput.key.metadata prefix. iii. Reduce output The metadata would have to be supplied by the MapReduce framework. Just like the map output we could have mapred.output.{key,value}.metadata.K properties. 5. Resolution process To take an Avro example: AvroReflectSerialization's accept method would look for a "serialization" key of org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.avro.AvroReflectSerialization. The nice thing about this is that we don't need a list of packages, or even a base type (AvroReflectSerializeable). This would only work if we had the mechanisms in 4 so that the metadata was passed around correctly. Writables are an existing Serialization, so the implementation is different, since there is plenty of existing data with no extra metadata (in SequenceFiles for instance). So its accept method would check to see if the "serialization" key is set, and if it is, that it is "org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization". If not set, it would fall back to the existing check: Writable.class.isAssignableFrom(c). > Add metadata to Serializations > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6165 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/serialization > Reporter: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6165.patch > > > The Serialization framework only allows a class to be passed as metadata. This assumes there is a one-to-one mapping between types and Serializations, which is overly restrictive. By permitting applications to pass arbitrary metadata to Serializations, they can get more control over which Serialization is used, and would also allow, for example, one to pass an Avro schema to an Avro Serialization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 12:10:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12169 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 12:10:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 12:10:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 31612 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 12:11:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31584 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 12:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31574 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 12:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F1F234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1579922700.1248264674814.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6163) Progress class should provide an api if phases exist In-Reply-To: <2055548189.1248066254958.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6163: --------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) As we don't have tasks without phases(both map tasks and reduce tasks have phases) for which we need progress, this is not an issue. > Progress class should provide an api if phases exist > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6163 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6163.patch, HADOOP-6163.v1.patch > > > Progress class needs to provide an api for client to know if there are phases. > This is needed for Task.setProgress() to decide whether to update progress of task or progress of current phase in the task. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 17:36:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56523 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 17:36:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:36:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 16027 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15986 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15972 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:37:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A529A0014 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1363337689.1248284234881.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734208#action_12734208 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6164: ------------------------------------------------ > BTW hudson didnt run any core-test for HDFS-450 Why it is related to BTW HDFS-450? Typo? I think Jakob was talking about [this test results|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-458?focusedCommentId=12732863&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12732863]. It got +1 on contrib test. Giridharan, could you take a second look? > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 17:38:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57659 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 17:38:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 18988 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18944 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18931 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 17:39:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:39:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D047A234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <427061340.1248284354839.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734209#action_12734209 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6164: ------------------------------------------------ > Why it is related to BTW HDFS-450? Typo? Oops, I got a typo. It should be "Why it is related to HDFS-450? Typo? " > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 17:40:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58498 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 17:40:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 17:40:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 20020 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:41:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19982 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 17:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19966 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 17:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:41:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAC829A0027 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <830397505.1248284475776.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734212#action_12734212 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6164: ------------------------------------- I've spoken with Giri about this offline. Hopefully he'll re-open the issue soon. > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 18:08:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74218 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 18:08:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 18:08:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 72807 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72778 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72763 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 18:09:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:09:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:09:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E403629A0016 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2045430377.1248286154932.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734231#action_12734231 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------------- when is this change going to be committed? > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 18:18:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78210 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 18:18:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 18:18:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 87169 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:19:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87122 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87111 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 18:19:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:19:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:19:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C45234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1654799633.1248286754797.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734232#action_12734232 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------- You never mark the jira "patch available". > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 18:22:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86412 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 18:22:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 18:22:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 89903 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89853 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:23:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89590 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 18:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EFA234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1458244412.1248286994865.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Sharad Agarwal Hi Sharad, do you think [my previous comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?focusedCommentId=12728409&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12728409] making sense? > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 18:38:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95195 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 18:38:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 18:38:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9613 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9545 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 18:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9304 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 18:39:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:39:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED381234C1EA for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <384029420.1248287954970.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6165) Add metadata to Serializations In-Reply-To: <1308804598.1248261914878.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734242#action_12734242 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6165: -------------------------------------- > is the following sufficient? > > public abstract boolean accept(Map metadata); I think it is, since this is called once per container, not per object. In some cases there may not be a more distinguished class than Object and/or the class may not be known. > Should we have a Metadata class to permit evolution of beyond Map? No, metadata should be trivially serializeable. > we could have properties to specify extra metadata. Metadata is a map, so something like mapred.mapoutput.{key,value}.metadata.K Alternately we can have a single key with a complex value, e.g.: mapred.mapoutput.metadata.key="a=b,b=c" We'd have to process escapes if we want values to be able to contain comma and equals. Or we could extend Configuration to fully support nested maps, e.g., a nested configuration in a value's XML would create a Map value. Or we could pass these through outside of the Configuration, e.g., in IFile. > Add metadata to Serializations > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6165 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/serialization > Reporter: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6165.patch > > > The Serialization framework only allows a class to be passed as metadata. This assumes there is a one-to-one mapping between types and Serializations, which is overly restrictive. By permitting applications to pass arbitrary metadata to Serializations, they can get more control over which Serialization is used, and would also allow, for example, one to pass an Avro schema to an Avro Serialization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 19:04:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5547 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 19:04:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 19:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 51902 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 19:05:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51861 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 19:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51851 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 19:05:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:05:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:05:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC6234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1472445229.1248289514817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734250#action_12734250 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6124: ------------------------------------------------ Quite a few javac warnings are getting in without being detected. See MAPREDUCE-716 and MAPREDUCE-743. Giridharan, if you are not going to work on this soon, please un-assign yourself. Someone else may want to work on this. > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 19:30:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11627 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 19:30:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 19:30:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 90398 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 19:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90358 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 19:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90348 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 19:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0729A0014 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <992574177.1248291075080.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5318) Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-5318: -------------------------------- Attachment: TestWriteConcurrency.java Rplot001.png Attaching a benchmark and the resulting box plots. This benchmark writes 1M pairs of into a SequenceFile with varying number of threads. The three series are: green: Before HADOOP-6148's improvement of CRC32 red: With HADOOP-6148's CRC committed (as it is in trunk) blue: With HADOOP-6148's CRC plus hadoop-5318.txt from this JIRA The results clearly show that the CRC implementation made the majority of the difference. Adding this patch seems to result in a very slight improvement. Here's the R script I used to generate the plot: {code} d.before.crc32 <- read.table(file="results_before_crc32.tsv", header=F) d.before <- read.table(file="results_before.tsv", header=F) d.after <- read.table(file="results_after.tsv", header=F) lims <- c(1000000, 6400000) log <- "" /* change to "y" to get log scale */ boxplot(V2 ~ V1, d.before.crc32, col="green", ylim=lims, at=(1:8)-0.4, log=log, boxwex=0.2) boxplot(V2 ~ V1, d.before, col="red", ylim=lims, at=(1:8)-0.2,boxwex=0.2, log=log, add=T) boxplot(V2 ~ V1, d.after, col="blue", ylim=lims, at=1:8+0.2,boxwex=0.2, log=log, add=T) legend(legend=c("before CRC32", "crc, no 5318", "5318+crc"), fill=c("green", "red", "blue"), x="topright",col="black") {code} Ran the benchmarks on: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_14-b08) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) Machine is a Nehalem box, dual quad core with hyperthreading (/proc/cpuinfo shows 16 CPUs: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5570 @ 2.93GHz) > Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Environment: 2x quad core xeon linux 64 bit > Reporter: Ben Maurer > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: buf.patch, buffer-output.patch, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, Rplot001.png, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java > > > The AtomicLong operations in counting file system statistics can cause high levels of contention with multiple threads. This test demonstrates having multiple threads writing to different sequence files: > {code:java} > import java.io.IOException; > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.ByteWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.CompressionType; > public class Test { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { > final Configuration c = new Configuration(); > final FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(c); > > final int NUM = 1000*1000; > for (int i = 0; i < Integer.valueOf(args[0]); i ++) { > final int ii = i; > new Thread(new Runnable() { > @Override > public void run() { > > try { > Writer f = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, c, new Path("/test/" + ii ), ByteWritable.class, ByteWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); > ByteWritable v = new ByteWritable(); > > long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); > for (int i = 0; i < NUM; i ++) > f.append(v, v); > f.close(); > long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > System.out.printf("%d opartions in %d msec. %f/second\n", NUM, end - time, (float)(1000 * NUM)/(end - time)); > > } catch (Exception e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > > } > }).start(); > } > } > } > {code} > The results of this benchmark are > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1431 msec. 698812.000000/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 3001 msec. 333222.250000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2985 msec. 335008.375000/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 4923 msec. 203128.171875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4924 msec. 203086.921875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4981 msec. 200762.906250/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 6716 msec. 148898.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 7048 msec. 141884.218750/second > 1000000 opartions in 7342 msec. 136202.671875/second > 1000000 opartions in 7344 msec. 136165.578125/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 10366 msec. 96469.226563/second > 1000000 opartions in 11085 msec. 90212.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 11121 msec. 89919.968750/second > 1000000 opartions in 11464 msec. 87229.585938/second > 1000000 opartions in 11538 msec. 86670.132813/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 16513 msec. 60558.347656/second > 1000000 opartions in 17704 msec. 56484.410156/second > 1000000 opartions in 18219 msec. 54887.753906/second > 1000000 opartions in 18550 msec. 53908.355469/second > 1000000 opartions in 18605 msec. 53748.992188/second > 1000000 opartions in 18663 msec. 53581.953125/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 22207 msec. 45030.847656/second > 1000000 opartions in 23275 msec. 42964.554688/second > 1000000 opartions in 23484 msec. 42582.183594/second > 1000000 opartions in 24378 msec. 41020.593750/second > 1000000 opartions in 24425 msec. 40941.656250/second > 1000000 opartions in 24533 msec. 40761.421875/second > 1000000 opartions in 24645 msec. 40576.183594/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 26375 msec. 37914.691406/second > 1000000 opartions in 26420 msec. 37850.113281/second > 1000000 opartions in 26532 msec. 37690.335938/second > 1000000 opartions in 26670 msec. 37495.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 29772 msec. 33588.605469/second > 1000000 opartions in 29859 msec. 33490.738281/second > 1000000 opartions in 30098 msec. 33224.800781/second > 1000000 opartions in 30082 msec. 33242.468750/second > {code} > However, if I comment out the file system statistics increments, the benchmark improves to: > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1194 msec. 837520.937500/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1639 msec. 610128.125000/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1899 msec. 526592.937500/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2065 msec. 484261.500000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2067 msec. 483792.937500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2151 msec. 464900.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2111 msec. 473709.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2153 msec. 464468.187500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2114 msec. 473036.906250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2113 msec. 473260.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2112 msec. 473484.843750/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2368 msec. 422297.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2334 msec. 428449.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2330 msec. 429184.562500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2375 msec. 421052.625000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2394 msec. 417710.937500/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2517 msec. 397298.375000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2539 msec. 393855.843750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2614 msec. 382555.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2666 msec. 375093.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2701 msec. 370233.250000/second > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 20:51:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32857 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 20:51:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 20:51:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 91576 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 20:27:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91532 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 20:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91509 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 20:27:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:27:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:27:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB9129A0027 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1958528591.1248294435047.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5318) Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734299#action_12734299 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-5318: ------------------------------------- Since the CRC code reaches to near peak throughput (90%) at about 128 or 256 byte chunks, a small buffer may be beneficial. Copying extra data is cheap for this size (2 to 4 cache lines -- the copy is in L1 cache), and extra delay before the CRC is also not very risky since its in L1 cache very briefly, not sitting off CPU in RAM. On the other hand, if all clients are buffering by at least this size, it is irrelevant. Writing tiny chunks however will impact throughput as the CRC per-call overhead adds up. See HADOOP-6148 for CRC32 benchmark numbers. Key breakpoints are about 128 to 256 byte chunk size for ~90% peak throughput, and 2k to 4k chunks where peak throughput is reached. > Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Environment: 2x quad core xeon linux 64 bit > Reporter: Ben Maurer > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: buf.patch, buffer-output.patch, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, Rplot001.png, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java > > > The AtomicLong operations in counting file system statistics can cause high levels of contention with multiple threads. This test demonstrates having multiple threads writing to different sequence files: > {code:java} > import java.io.IOException; > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.ByteWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.CompressionType; > public class Test { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { > final Configuration c = new Configuration(); > final FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(c); > > final int NUM = 1000*1000; > for (int i = 0; i < Integer.valueOf(args[0]); i ++) { > final int ii = i; > new Thread(new Runnable() { > @Override > public void run() { > > try { > Writer f = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, c, new Path("/test/" + ii ), ByteWritable.class, ByteWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); > ByteWritable v = new ByteWritable(); > > long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); > for (int i = 0; i < NUM; i ++) > f.append(v, v); > f.close(); > long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > System.out.printf("%d opartions in %d msec. %f/second\n", NUM, end - time, (float)(1000 * NUM)/(end - time)); > > } catch (Exception e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > > } > }).start(); > } > } > } > {code} > The results of this benchmark are > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1431 msec. 698812.000000/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 3001 msec. 333222.250000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2985 msec. 335008.375000/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 4923 msec. 203128.171875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4924 msec. 203086.921875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4981 msec. 200762.906250/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 6716 msec. 148898.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 7048 msec. 141884.218750/second > 1000000 opartions in 7342 msec. 136202.671875/second > 1000000 opartions in 7344 msec. 136165.578125/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 10366 msec. 96469.226563/second > 1000000 opartions in 11085 msec. 90212.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 11121 msec. 89919.968750/second > 1000000 opartions in 11464 msec. 87229.585938/second > 1000000 opartions in 11538 msec. 86670.132813/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 16513 msec. 60558.347656/second > 1000000 opartions in 17704 msec. 56484.410156/second > 1000000 opartions in 18219 msec. 54887.753906/second > 1000000 opartions in 18550 msec. 53908.355469/second > 1000000 opartions in 18605 msec. 53748.992188/second > 1000000 opartions in 18663 msec. 53581.953125/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 22207 msec. 45030.847656/second > 1000000 opartions in 23275 msec. 42964.554688/second > 1000000 opartions in 23484 msec. 42582.183594/second > 1000000 opartions in 24378 msec. 41020.593750/second > 1000000 opartions in 24425 msec. 40941.656250/second > 1000000 opartions in 24533 msec. 40761.421875/second > 1000000 opartions in 24645 msec. 40576.183594/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 26375 msec. 37914.691406/second > 1000000 opartions in 26420 msec. 37850.113281/second > 1000000 opartions in 26532 msec. 37690.335938/second > 1000000 opartions in 26670 msec. 37495.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 29772 msec. 33588.605469/second > 1000000 opartions in 29859 msec. 33490.738281/second > 1000000 opartions in 30098 msec. 33224.800781/second > 1000000 opartions in 30082 msec. 33242.468750/second > {code} > However, if I comment out the file system statistics increments, the benchmark improves to: > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1194 msec. 837520.937500/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1639 msec. 610128.125000/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1899 msec. 526592.937500/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2065 msec. 484261.500000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2067 msec. 483792.937500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2151 msec. 464900.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2111 msec. 473709.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2153 msec. 464468.187500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2114 msec. 473036.906250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2113 msec. 473260.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2112 msec. 473484.843750/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2368 msec. 422297.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2334 msec. 428449.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2330 msec. 429184.562500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2375 msec. 421052.625000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2394 msec. 417710.937500/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2517 msec. 397298.375000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2539 msec. 393855.843750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2614 msec. 382555.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2666 msec. 375093.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2701 msec. 370233.250000/second > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 22 21:08:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43823 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 21:08:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 21:08:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 72755 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 21:09:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72699 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 21:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72542 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 21:09:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:09:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F3C234C053 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <517792960.1248296955068.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:09:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5318) Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734321#action_12734321 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-5318: ------------------------------------- Scott: I think if we add buffering it should be at the "client" level - eg in SequenceFileOutputStream or anywhere else that very small records will be written at a high rate. Doing so in the FSDataOutputStream seems heavy-handed, since we don't know what size the writes will usually be, and I'd imagine the usual is much larger than this pathological test case we used for the benchmark. I'm also not sure I see your point about the L1 cache - in between the small writes there may be arbitrary amounts of computation (eg in the mapper function) that would evict the buffer from cache. > Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Environment: 2x quad core xeon linux 64 bit > Reporter: Ben Maurer > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: buf.patch, buffer-output.patch, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, Rplot001.png, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java > > > The AtomicLong operations in counting file system statistics can cause high levels of contention with multiple threads. This test demonstrates having multiple threads writing to different sequence files: > {code:java} > import java.io.IOException; > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.ByteWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.CompressionType; > public class Test { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { > final Configuration c = new Configuration(); > final FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(c); > > final int NUM = 1000*1000; > for (int i = 0; i < Integer.valueOf(args[0]); i ++) { > final int ii = i; > new Thread(new Runnable() { > @Override > public void run() { > > try { > Writer f = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, c, new Path("/test/" + ii ), ByteWritable.class, ByteWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); > ByteWritable v = new ByteWritable(); > > long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); > for (int i = 0; i < NUM; i ++) > f.append(v, v); > f.close(); > long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > System.out.printf("%d opartions in %d msec. %f/second\n", NUM, end - time, (float)(1000 * NUM)/(end - time)); > > } catch (Exception e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > > } > }).start(); > } > } > } > {code} > The results of this benchmark are > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1431 msec. 698812.000000/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 3001 msec. 333222.250000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2985 msec. 335008.375000/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 4923 msec. 203128.171875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4924 msec. 203086.921875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4981 msec. 200762.906250/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 6716 msec. 148898.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 7048 msec. 141884.218750/second > 1000000 opartions in 7342 msec. 136202.671875/second > 1000000 opartions in 7344 msec. 136165.578125/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 10366 msec. 96469.226563/second > 1000000 opartions in 11085 msec. 90212.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 11121 msec. 89919.968750/second > 1000000 opartions in 11464 msec. 87229.585938/second > 1000000 opartions in 11538 msec. 86670.132813/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 16513 msec. 60558.347656/second > 1000000 opartions in 17704 msec. 56484.410156/second > 1000000 opartions in 18219 msec. 54887.753906/second > 1000000 opartions in 18550 msec. 53908.355469/second > 1000000 opartions in 18605 msec. 53748.992188/second > 1000000 opartions in 18663 msec. 53581.953125/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 22207 msec. 45030.847656/second > 1000000 opartions in 23275 msec. 42964.554688/second > 1000000 opartions in 23484 msec. 42582.183594/second > 1000000 opartions in 24378 msec. 41020.593750/second > 1000000 opartions in 24425 msec. 40941.656250/second > 1000000 opartions in 24533 msec. 40761.421875/second > 1000000 opartions in 24645 msec. 40576.183594/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 26375 msec. 37914.691406/second > 1000000 opartions in 26420 msec. 37850.113281/second > 1000000 opartions in 26532 msec. 37690.335938/second > 1000000 opartions in 26670 msec. 37495.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 29772 msec. 33588.605469/second > 1000000 opartions in 29859 msec. 33490.738281/second > 1000000 opartions in 30098 msec. 33224.800781/second > 1000000 opartions in 30082 msec. 33242.468750/second > {code} > However, if I comment out the file system statistics increments, the benchmark improves to: > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1194 msec. 837520.937500/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1639 msec. 610128.125000/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1899 msec. 526592.937500/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2065 msec. 484261.500000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2067 msec. 483792.937500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2151 msec. 464900.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2111 msec. 473709.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2153 msec. 464468.187500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2114 msec. 473036.906250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2113 msec. 473260.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2112 msec. 473484.843750/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2368 msec. 422297.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2334 msec. 428449.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2330 msec. 429184.562500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2375 msec. 421052.625000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2394 msec. 417710.937500/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2517 msec. 397298.375000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2539 msec. 393855.843750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2614 msec. 382555.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2666 msec. 375093.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2701 msec. 370233.250000/second > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 01:40:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37085 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 01:40:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 01:40:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 82362 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:41:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82333 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:41:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82323 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 01:41:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:41:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:41:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDBA29A0014 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:41:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Improve PureJavaCrc32 --------------------- Key: HADOOP-6166 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 01:44:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38615 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 01:44:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 01:44:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 83966 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83922 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83859 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 01:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:45:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E9B234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1684083349.1248313514857.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c6166_20090722.patch c6166_20090722.patch: Tried a few CRC32 implementations. > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 01:52:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42257 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 01:52:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 01:52:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 88301 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:53:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88215 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:53:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87859 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 01:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:53:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A2C29A0017 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:53:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fernando (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: Fernando bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. as such: # run it if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" else exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" fi I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 01:54:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43040 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 01:54:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 01:54:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 90527 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90463 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90205 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:55:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:55:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF86729A0015 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1940428464.1248314114914.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fernando (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fernando updated HADOOP-6167: ----------------------------- Attachment: hadoop proposed new bin/hadoop script file. The only change is in the last few lines. > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 01:54:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43151 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 01:54:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 01:54:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 90829 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90785 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90775 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 01:55:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:55:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:55:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD82F234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1243249652.1248314114827.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:55:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt: Tested the implementations on both 32-bit and 64-bit VMs. Seems that Crc32_4_3 are faster than current PureJavaCrc32 in both cases. (Sorry that I still have not tested with TestPureJavaCrc32.PerformanceTest.) > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 03:36:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70495 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 03:36:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 03:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 73455 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 03:37:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73413 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 03:37:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73403 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 03:37:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:37:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:37:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40305234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1938396138.1248320235248.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734445#action_12734445 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------- One could take Intel's idea, and go 8 (or 6 or 12?) bytes at a time instead of 4. This would line up with the 12 bit lookup tables a bit better. 6 bytes might be the easier boundary, and require 4 12 bit lookup tables. which is 32K, the size of the tables in the inner loop in your "4_3" are 17K, and the current version is 4K. Going 12 bytes at a time would require 8 tables and 64K of space, and then we're randomly jumping around lookup tables that don't fit in a L1 D-cache on some processors. The 8 bytes at a time approach is in C code (BSD license) here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/slicing-by-8/files/ The trick with going over 4 bytes in a loop has to do with how the cycle works on the CRC. I think, after the first four bytes of lookups, it changes a bit. But I didn't read that much into that code to be sure of what it is doing. They do it with 8 1K lookup tables each of one byte indexes. They also get to directly Xor out of the byte array a single int, rather than grabbing one byte at a time and shifting. We can do that with a ByteBuffer with getInt(), but when I tried that (with getInt) in the previous case the byte buffer creation overhead was too large, and the ByteBuffer access seemed very inefficient for some reason. Oh how nice it would be if you could grab the next 4 bytes in a byte[] as an Int (or the next 8 as a Long) without wrapping it in a ByteBuffer, and let the compiler figure out the optimal processor load instruction. I think a 6 byte at a time, 4 lookup of 12 bit LUT would be like this: {code} public class Crc32_6_4 extends Crc32Base { /** {@inheritDoc} */ public void update(byte[] b, int off, int len) { while(len > 3) { crc ^= b[off++] & 0xff; crc ^= (b[off++] & 0xff) << 8; crc ^= (b[off++] & 0xff) << 16; crc ^= (b[off++] & 0xff) << 24; int c0 = b[off++] & 0xff;; c0 ^= (b[off++] & 0xff) << 8; crc = T12_3[crc & 0xfff] ^ T12_2[(crc >>> 12) & 0xfff] ^ T12_1[((crc >>> 24) & (c0 << 8)) & 0xfff] ^ T12_0[c0 >> 4]; len -= 6; } for (; len > 0; len--) { crc = (crc >>> 8) ^ Table8_0[(crc ^ b[off++]) & 0xff]; } } {code} Assuming the tables were built right and the "wrap past 4 bytes means don't xor with crc" is correct. I haven't tried this at all. All of these with larger lookup tables run the risk of performing worse under concurrency, even if faster single threaded. Cache pressure is greater under concurrency. We might want to use the benchmark in HADOOP-5318, which is heavily CRC reliant, as a check to make sure we aren't regressing under higher concurrency due to cache pressure. For reference, Intel's C code (referenced above, snippet below) with 8 tables looks like this in the inner loop: {code} /*++ * * Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Intel Corporation - All Rights Reserved * * This software program is licensed subject to the BSD License, * available at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html * * Abstract: The main routine * --*/ crc32c_sb8_64_bit( uint32_t* p_running_crc, const uint8_t* p_buf, const uint32_t length, const uint32_t init_bytes, uint8_t mode) { uint32_t li; uint32_t crc, term1, term2; uint32_t running_length; uint32_t end_bytes; if(mode == MODE_CONT) crc = *p_running_crc; else crc = CRC32C_INIT_REFLECTED; running_length = ((length - init_bytes)/8)*8; end_bytes = length - init_bytes - running_length; for(li=0; li < init_bytes; li++) crc = crc_tableil8_o32[(crc ^ *p_buf++) & 0x000000FF] ^ (crc >> 8); for(li=0; li < running_length/8; li++) { crc ^= *(uint32_t *)p_buf; p_buf += 4; term1 = crc_tableil8_o88[crc & 0x000000FF] ^ crc_tableil8_o80[(crc >> 8) & 0x000000FF]; term2 = crc >> 16; crc = term1 ^ crc_tableil8_o72[term2 & 0x000000FF] ^ crc_tableil8_o64[(term2 >> 8) & 0x000000FF]; term1 = crc_tableil8_o56[(*(uint32_t *)p_buf) & 0x000000FF] ^ crc_tableil8_o48[((*(uint32_t *)p_buf) >> 8) & 0x000000FF]; term2 = (*(uint32_t *)p_buf) >> 16; crc = crc ^ term1 ^ crc_tableil8_o40[term2 & 0x000000FF] ^ crc_tableil8_o32[(term2 >> 8) & 0x000000FF]; p_buf += 4; } for(li=0; li < end_bytes; li++) crc = crc_tableil8_o32[(crc ^ *p_buf++) & 0x000000FF] ^ (crc >> 8); if((mode == MODE_BEGIN) || (mode == MODE_CONT)) return crc; return crc ^ XOROT; } {code} That is pretty straightforward to implement if the next 4 tables (T5, T6, T7, T8 in the terminology of the current PureJavaCRC32) are generated the same way as the previous 4. Intel makes sure the inner loop is on an 8 byte boundary, because the C compiler can make the load needed for the {code}crc ^= *(uint32_t *)p_buf{code} part faster if that is the case. They also tend to favor shifting by 16 and 8 and avoiding shifting by 24 for some reason. I may try out the eight bytes at once with 8 lookup tables version next week. > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 04:12:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75047 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 04:12:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 04:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 99855 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99678 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99668 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 04:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D3129A0015 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <226879173.1248322395096.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:13:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734452#action_12734452 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6123: ---------------------------------------- bq. do you think my previous comment making sense? I don't think the "for loop" can be replaced by using the wildcard. It won't expand the path in CLASSPATH. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 04:14:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75307 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 04:14:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 04:14:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1243 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1192 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1178 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 04:15:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:15:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:15:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BE7234C004 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <571503760.1248322515283.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:15:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 04:26:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76404 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 04:26:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 04:26:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6524 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6480 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 04:27:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6470 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 04:27:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:27:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:27:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C7C29A0016 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <719917983.1248323234919.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734456#action_12734456 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6164: -------------------------------------------- my bad, I mistook hdfs-458 for hdfs-450 and made the inference. But looking the core-test console log: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-vesta.apache.org/25/console [exec] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.745 sec [exec] [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestInterDatanodeProtocol FAILED TestInterDatanodeProtocol test failed for some reason; and hudson while parsing the xml results didn't consider the test failure. since there is a failure in the test-core ant target test-patch script gave a -1 for this patch for core test. I'm not sure why hudson didn't consider this failure while generating the test report. I closed this invalid b'coz I pretty much know test-patch doesn't consider the no of tests being run by previous and current hudson build jobs. http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-vesta.apache.org/25/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode/TestInterDatanodeProtocol/ If you think I'm missing something please reopen this jira. Thanks, > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 06:52:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40697 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 06:52:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 06:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 50874 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 06:53:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50830 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 06:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50820 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 06:53:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:53:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:53:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78D229A0015 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1342936440.1248331994882.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6124: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6124.patch this patch adds the clean target before calling the tar while searching for javac warnings and also address the issue mentioned as part of HADOOP-6077. > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch, HADOOP-6124.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 08:04:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55548 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 08:04:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 08:04:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 12864 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 08:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12829 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 08:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12819 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 08:05:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:05:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:05:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F233C29A0018 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1254746822.1248336314991.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:05:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734509#action_12734509 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6164: ------------------------------------- Well I imagine it's worth finding out why Hudson let through a patch that failed a test without reporting it. This is a pretty big issue if it's happening with other patches; can you please follow up on it? > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 09:38:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85315 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 09:38:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 09:38:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 14430 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 09:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14387 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 09:39:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14377 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 09:39:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:39:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E15E234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <425777178.1248341955239.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:39:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734532#action_12734532 ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna commented on HADOOP-6105: ----------------------------------------------- Assumptions/Requirements: * Deprecated keys never occur in default.xml files. * There won't be any storage for deprecated keys in the Configuration object. Instead, new key mappings will be used. * The precedence order is as follows: *# Value which comes with the final attribute as true. *# Value occurring with the deprecated key. The following table depicts the various cases arising, keeping in view whether the key in concern is final and if the key is deprecated: *NOTE:* # *Key* - the current key that is to be loaded in loadResource method. It can be a deprecated key (*old*), key in default.xml (*key_default*) or key in site.xml (*key_site*). # *Prev. Occurrence* - The attribute which changed the value of the *Key* most recently. # *isFinal* - true if *Key* is having the _final_ property set to true. # *isPrevFinal* - true if *Prev. Occurrence* is having the _final_ property set to true. # *Value* - Value to be expected after *Key* is loaded. It can be either of the values corresponding to *old*, *key_default* or *key_site*. # _warn_ - logs a warning message indicating that a final parameter is being attempted to override. Also, a warning message which indicates the usage of a deprecated key is logged whenever *Key* is a deprecated one. ||Key||isFinal||Prev.Occurrence||isPrevFinal||Value|| |old|true|key_default|true|old| |old|true|key_default|false|old| |old|true|key_site|true|old| |old|true|key_site|false|old| |old|false|key_default|true|key_default (warn)| |old|false|key_default|false|old| |old|false|key_site|true|key_site (warn)| |old|false|key_site|false|old| |key_site|true|old|true|old| |key_site|true|old|false|key_site| |key_site|true|key_default|true|key_default (warn)| |key_site|true|key_default|false|key_site| |key_site|false|old|true|old| |key_site|false|old|false|old| |key_site|false|key_default|true|key_default (warn)| |key_site|false|key_default|false|key_site| > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 10:30:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16148 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 10:30:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 10:30:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 93245 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 10:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93202 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 10:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93192 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 10:31:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:31:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E829F29A001E for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1980566547.1248345074950.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734543#action_12734543 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6164: -------------------------------------------- I agree with you and I would follow up with this issue. But this is for the first time I'm hearing something like this. If you agree that this not something to do with test-patch then I can openup a different jira and deal with hudson issue or we can file a bug with hudson dev. thanks > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 16:22:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14317 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 16:22:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 16:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 54265 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 16:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54187 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 16:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54138 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 16:23:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:23:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100FA234C046 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1529253317.1248366195064.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4490) Map and Reduce tasks should run as the user who submitted the job MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amar Kamat updated HADOOP-4490: ------------------------------- Attachment: 2701949.4490.9.patch Attaching an example patch for branch 20 not to be committed. > Map and Reduce tasks should run as the user who submitted the job > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4490 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4490 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Hemanth Yamijala > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 2701949.4490.9.patch, cluster_setup.pdf, cluster_setup.pdf, HADOOP-4490-1.patch, HADOOP-4490-1.patch, hadoop-4490-10.patch, hadoop-4490-11.patch, hadoop-4490-12.patch, hadoop-4490-13.patch, hadoop-4490-14.patch, HADOOP-4490-2.patch, HADOOP-4490-3.patch, hadoop-4490-4.patch, hadoop-4490-5.patch, hadoop-4490-6.patch, hadoop-4490-7.patch, hadoop-4490-8.patch, hadoop-4490-9.patch, hadoop-4490-br20-3.2.patch, hadoop-4490-br20-3.patch, hadoop-4490-design.pdf, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490_streaming.patch > > > Currently the TaskTracker spawns the map/reduce tasks, resulting in them running as the user who started the TaskTracker. > For security and accounting purposes the tasks should be run as the job-owner. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 17:36:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58649 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 17:36:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 17:36:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 35595 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35560 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35545 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 17:37:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:37:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41A2234C04B for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1446445809.1248370634933.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734657#action_12734657 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------------ > I don't think the "for loop" can be replaced by using the wildcard. It won't expand the path in CLASSPATH. In the [java man page|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/java.html], it says, {quote} -classpath classpath -cp classpath ... As a special convenience, a class path element containing a basename of * is considered equivalent to specifying a list of all the files in the directory with the extension .jar or .JAR (a java program cannot tell the difference between the two invocations). For example, if directory foo contains a.jar and b.JAR, then the class path element foo/* is expanded to a A.jar:b.JAR, except that the order of jar files is unspecified. ... {quote} > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 18:33:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3633 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 18:33:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 18:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 55678 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:34:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55635 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55625 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 18:34:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:34:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F5B234C046 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2065865070.1248374054879.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:34:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fernando (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734691#action_12734691 ] Fernando commented on HADOOP-6167: ---------------------------------- HBase scripts have the same issue since they were just copying things from Hadoop.. so they have the same bug. Here is the related bug in HBase: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1687 > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 18:39:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6134 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 18:39:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 18:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 66982 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66938 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66928 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA184234C046 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1009432768.1248374414892.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734693#action_12734693 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------------ Yeah, the speed depends on many platform dependent details like cache size, 32-bit/64-bit, etc. So reducing the number of operations in the CRC algorithm may not lead to a better performance. I tried more varieties like Crc32_6_4 but my implementation did not perform well. We should run benchmark on Scott's. > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 18:39:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6209 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 18:39:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 18:39:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 67334 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67307 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67297 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 18:40:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4C2234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1278669946.1248374414813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "ryan rawson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734692#action_12734692 ] ryan rawson commented on HADOOP-6167: ------------------------------------- I'm not sure this is true, my datanode processes are running like so: /usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14/bin/java -Xmx1000m -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Xmx2000m -XX:+DoEscapeAnalysis (all the other arguments) in hadoop-env.sh i have: export HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS="-Xmx2000m -XX:+DoEscapeAnalysis ...." how does this not work? > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 19:17:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31657 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 19:17:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 19:17:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 68798 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 19:18:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68752 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 19:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68677 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 19:18:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:18:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:18:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4CD29A0015 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <406796382.1248376695180.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734735#action_12734735 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6167: -------------------------------------- This might be better done by: - adding JAVA_HEAP_MAX to HADOOP_OPTS if it does not already contain -Xmx - removing JAVA_HEAP_MAX from the java command Also, please attach a patch file, not the altered source file. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 19:21:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32462 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 19:21:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 19:21:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 71849 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 19:22:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71779 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 19:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71756 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 19:22:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:22:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:22:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D18129A001D for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1350230471.1248376935249.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6120) Add support for Avro types in hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6120: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Sharad! > Add support for Avro types in hadoop > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6120 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6120_v1.patch, 6120_v2.patch, 6120_v3.patch, 6120_v4.patch, 6120_v5.patch, 6120_v6.patch, HADOOP-6120.patch > > > Support to serialize and deserialize Avro types in Hadoop. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 20:06:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51882 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 20:06:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 20:06:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 63535 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:07:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63489 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:07:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63471 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 20:07:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:07:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:07:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63DF234C046 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1003483123.1248379634876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6168) HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6168 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.18.3 Reporter: Allen Wittenauer The hadoop script forces a heap that cannot be easily overridden if one wants to push the same config everywhere. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 20:12:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55678 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 20:12:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 20:12:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 71399 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71355 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71345 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 20:13:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:13:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,WEIRD_QUOTING X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA20A234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <101070509.1248379994813.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6168) HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily In-Reply-To: <1003483123.1248379634876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734759#action_12734759 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6168: ------------------------------------------ So bin/hadoop has this logic: JAVA_HEAP_MAX=-Xmx1000m # check envvars which might override default args if [ "$HADOOP_HEAPSIZE" != "" ]; then #echo "run with heapsize $HADOOP_HEAPSIZE" JAVA_HEAP_MAX="-Xmx""$HADOOP_HEAPSIZE""m" #echo $JAVA_HEAP_MAX fi This makes it impossible to create a hadoop-env.sh that is truly generic to all nodes. It would be better to do this HEAPSIZE management in hadoop-env.sh to allow it to be easily override-able. > HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6168 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > The hadoop script forces a heap that cannot be easily overridden if one wants to push the same config everywhere. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 20:20:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58205 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 20:20:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 20:20:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 85484 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:21:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85441 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 20:21:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85431 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 20:21:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:21:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:21:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA85234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <848066752.1248380474825.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734762#action_12734762 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------------ Unfortunately, Crc32_4_3 only wins on a 32-bit vm over TestPureJavaCrc32.PerformanceTest but not 64-bit vm. - 32-bit vm ||num bytes||CRC32 MB/sec||Crc32_4_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec|| | 1 |4.504 |52.409 |55.779 |46.603 |59.146 | | 2 |8.825 |86.590 |87.938 |77.267 |89.942 | | 4 |17.254 |119.824 |151.929 |120.808 |146.983 | | 8 |32.037 |147.222 |202.527 |161.984 |174.844 | | 16 |59.078 |161.879 |231.467 |195.635 |228.018 | | 32 |100.267 |176.767 |276.844 |241.295 |244.502 | | 64 |148.985 |178.250 |283.511 |269.368 |263.209 | | 128 |199.763 |185.639 |294.116 |271.943 |259.021 | | 256 |232.751 |179.525 |290.357 |259.453 |256.891 | | 512 |255.430 |178.217 |296.907 |280.763 |257.362 | | 1024 |262.274 |172.033 |289.806 |277.863 |261.793 | | 2048 |273.744 |187.468 |299.271 |286.387 |272.611 | | 4096 |289.373 |186.306 |293.845 |276.021 |266.067 | | 8192 |290.282 |184.625 |296.723 |285.097 |271.503 | | 16384 |298.959 |180.863 |291.081 |250.583 |199.536 | | 32768 |277.718 |184.078 |293.156 |285.722 |270.377 | | 65536 |300.016 |186.439 |298.946 |283.990 |271.268 | | 131072 |298.971 |186.754 |298.417 |283.949 |268.240 | | 262144 |299.688 |184.124 |296.014 |281.633 |265.799 | | 524288 |282.488 |176.217 |288.120 |284.030 |267.917 | | 1048576 |294.852 |185.167 |291.499 |279.362 |267.438 | | 2097152 |296.117 |174.667 |281.145 |272.180 |260.837 | | 4194304 |283.934 |173.777 |279.931 |271.393 |259.805 | | 8388608 |289.455 |177.829 |291.535 |269.850 |259.513 | | 16777216 |284.204 |177.449 |290.489 |276.586 |265.657 | - 64-bit vm ||num bytes||CRC32 MB/sec||Crc32_4_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec|| | 1 |7.636 |80.107 |99.658 |77.283 |34.446 | | 2 |14.598 |116.202 |110.091 |94.056 |106.498 | | 4 |27.786 |152.932 |197.294 |147.532 |175.766 | | 8 |50.159 |153.598 |194.617 |163.596 |197.350 | | 16 |85.036 |177.761 |258.683 |237.917 |278.764 | | 32 |130.278 |180.486 |310.024 |281.343 |342.374 | | 64 |177.501 |181.663 |343.592 |320.385 |384.938 | | 128 |217.128 |181.836 |366.965 |338.893 |411.724 | | 256 |245.690 |182.637 |379.003 |348.981 |425.874 | | 512 |262.085 |181.103 |381.961 |355.506 |428.103 | | 1024 |271.307 |179.753 |381.658 |356.488 |433.800 | | 2048 |276.640 |180.451 |378.667 |351.067 |437.275 | | 4096 |278.435 |179.881 |372.762 |347.728 |437.209 | | 8192 |279.883 |180.776 |377.241 |351.178 |439.571 | | 16384 |281.385 |180.775 |377.493 |353.361 |439.606 | | 32768 |281.434 |180.703 |378.047 |353.656 |438.703 | | 65536 |281.354 |180.914 |377.805 |353.130 |437.152 | | 131072 |280.941 |180.288 |377.164 |353.340 |438.806 | | 262144 |282.056 |180.910 |378.514 |354.320 |438.208 | | 524288 |281.066 |180.177 |377.148 |352.832 |437.183 | | 1048576 |281.668 |180.790 |378.412 |354.059 |438.755 | | 2097152 |282.162 |180.545 |377.918 |353.841 |438.497 | | 4194304 |281.379 |179.018 |376.287 |352.240 |436.963 | | 8388608 |279.929 |178.058 |371.618 |349.405 |430.993 | | 16777216 |278.974 |177.577 |371.729 |347.971 |429.326 | > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 21:22:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80506 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 21:22:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 21:22:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 71859 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71805 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71531 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 21:23:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:23:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CAC234C053 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1992376851.1248384194956.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734792#action_12734792 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-5438: ------------------------------------- So, as committed there are now six create methods that take a boolean value as to whether or not overwrite (and converts them to an enumset) and one create method that takes an EnumSet. HADOOP-3252 will definitely help with this, but this still seems odd and counterintuitive. If we have the CreateFlag enum, we should use it everywhere. Otherwise the methods are a bit confusing - a user will sit there going 'why are there so many create methods and why is there is this odd one out - isn't overwrite boolean the same as the createflag enum?' If there weren't so many different create methods, I would suggest having one each for just the Enum value and and equivalent one that takes an enumset, so that if you just wanted to overwrite you could just use the one that takes the enum, and the convenience method would jam it into an enumset. It's too bad Java won't automatically convert a single enum into an enumset when necessary. > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 21:32:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86406 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 21:32:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 21:32:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 80839 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80796 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80786 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 21:33:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:33:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86DF234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1989670659.1248384794807.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:33:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6150: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch Same patch for hadoop 0.20. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 21:38:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90243 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 21:38:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 21:38:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 86733 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86616 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86558 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 21:39:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:39:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:39:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68EF234C053 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <905730474.1248385154943.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-5864) Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reopened HADOOP-5864: -------------------------------------------- Talked to Suresh. Look like that the changes was lost during project split. > Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: findBugs.patch, findBugs1.patch, findBugs2.patch, findbugs3.hdfs.patch > > > This issue is to fix the following findbugs: > DMI in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.INodeDirectory.getExistingPathINodes(byte[][], INode[]) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.linkBlocks(File, File, int) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createBlockWriteStreams(File, File) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.getTmpInputStreams(Block, long, long) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ContextFactory.setAttributes() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 21:42:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91929 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 21:42:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 21:42:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 89654 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89611 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89601 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 21:43:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:43:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:43:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD30234C046 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1525779092.1248385394842.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5864) Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-5864. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed I have re-committed the missing changes to hdfs trunk. Thanks, Suresh! > Fix DMI and OBL findbugs in packages hdfs and metrics > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5864 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5864 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: findBugs.patch, findBugs1.patch, findBugs2.patch, findbugs3.hdfs.patch > > > This issue is to fix the following findbugs: > DMI in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.INodeDirectory.getExistingPathINodes(byte[][], INode[]) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.linkBlocks(File, File, int) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.createBlockWriteStreams(File, File) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.getTmpInputStreams(Block, long, long) > OBL in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ContextFactory.setAttributes() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 21:48:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96214 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 21:48:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 21:48:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 98127 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98080 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 21:49:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98070 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 21:49:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:49:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:49:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89DB234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1018878767.1248385754817.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "gary murry (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734805#action_12734805 ] gary murry commented on HADOOP-6164: ------------------------------------ Hi Giri, If another jira is being opened for this, can we make sure an link the issues for tracking? I think it is agreed that this is not a test-patch issue, but rather a hudson issue. Thanks, -Gary > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 23 22:29:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13912 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2009 22:29:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 22:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 26502 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 22:30:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26459 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2009 22:30:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26449 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2009 22:30:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:30:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:30:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0568234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1775980808.1248388214839.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:30:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6132) RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol In-Reply-To: <840919907.1247085075163.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raghu Angadi updated HADOOP-6132: --------------------------------- Tags: RPC Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks Kan. > RPC client opens an extra connection for VersionedProtocol > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6132 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 1.patch, 2.patch > > > RPC client caches connections per protocol. However, since all of our real protocols are subclasses of VersionedProtocol, a bug in the implementation makes the client opens an extra connection just for the VersionedProtocol, which is not needed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 00:05:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35642 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 00:05:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 00:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 11104 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11060 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11049 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 00:06:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:06:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FFF234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1633438328.1248393974800.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734839#action_12734839 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6150: ----------------------------------- test-patch output for patch for hadoop trunk: [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 00:09:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36192 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 00:09:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 00:09:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 15562 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:10:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15518 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15508 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 00:10:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:10:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:10:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C659B234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1116363998.1248394214798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734841#action_12734841 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6150: -------------------------------------- +1. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 00:37:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47123 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 00:37:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 00:37:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 33240 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33198 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33188 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 00:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:38:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41359234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1113947182.1248395895259.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734849#action_12734849 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6150: ----------------------------------- test-patch output for patch for hadoop 20: [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 01:16:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69856 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 01:16:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 01:16:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 75889 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 01:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75845 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 01:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75835 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 01:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:17:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12666234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1549950480.1248398235058.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:17:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734863#action_12734863 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6150: -------------------------------------- I just committed this. Thanks Hong. > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 01:50:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92078 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 01:50:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 01:50:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 97567 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 01:51:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97530 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 01:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97516 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 01:51:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:51:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:51:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A5B234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7152271.1248400274793.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:51:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fernando (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fernando updated HADOOP-6167: ----------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-script.diff Ok. this is the diff now. Have a look, I cleaned it up a little to do what you suggested. > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop, hadoop-script.diff > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 03:42:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28046 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 03:42:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 03:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 67597 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 03:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67549 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 03:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67539 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 03:43:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:43:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0719234C051 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <775761630.1248406994918.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734891#action_12734891 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6123: ---------------------------------------- @Tsz When I tried, it didn't work for me. May be I am missing something. Have you tried it? If it works for you, can you post a patch? > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 03:51:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29099 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 03:51:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 03:51:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 74088 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 03:52:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74046 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 03:52:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74036 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 03:52:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:52:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:52:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A19234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1680582874.1248407534786.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6168) HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily In-Reply-To: <1003483123.1248379634876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734892#action_12734892 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-6168: ----------------------------------- Though not the cleanest, there is a way to do this using various HADOOP_*_OPTS. We can set heap size also in these opts, for e.g. HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS=-Xmx2000m, it will be eventually picked up by the running command. It works this way because jvm takes up the last -Xmx value that occurs in the command line which would be from HADOOP_OPTS. {code} exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS $CLASS "$@"{code} > HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6168 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > The hadoop script forces a heap that cannot be easily overridden if one wants to push the same config everywhere. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 03:59:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29789 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 03:59:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 03:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 77997 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 04:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77959 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 04:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77948 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 04:00:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:00:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2981234C004 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1583349091.1248408014784.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6168) HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily In-Reply-To: <1003483123.1248379634876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734893#action_12734893 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-6168: ----------------------------------- Oh, and I think this issue is a duplicate of HADOOP-6167. > HADOOP_HEAPSIZE cannot be done per-server easily > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6168 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6168 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > The hadoop script forces a heap that cannot be easily overridden if one wants to push the same config everywhere. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 04:17:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32165 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 04:17:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 04:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 85336 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 04:18:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85264 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 04:18:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85013 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 04:18:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:18:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:18:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0F6234C053 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1006773588.1248409095052.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-4490) Map and Reduce tasks should run as the user who submitted the job MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amar Kamat updated HADOOP-4490: ------------------------------- Attachment: (was: 2701949.4490.9.patch) > Map and Reduce tasks should run as the user who submitted the job > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4490 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4490 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Hemanth Yamijala > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: cluster_setup.pdf, cluster_setup.pdf, HADOOP-4490-1.patch, HADOOP-4490-1.patch, hadoop-4490-10.patch, hadoop-4490-11.patch, hadoop-4490-12.patch, hadoop-4490-13.patch, hadoop-4490-14.patch, HADOOP-4490-2.patch, HADOOP-4490-3.patch, hadoop-4490-4.patch, hadoop-4490-5.patch, hadoop-4490-6.patch, hadoop-4490-7.patch, hadoop-4490-8.patch, hadoop-4490-9.patch, hadoop-4490-br20-3.2.patch, hadoop-4490-br20-3.patch, hadoop-4490-design.pdf, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490.patch, HADOOP-4490_streaming.patch > > > Currently the TaskTracker spawns the map/reduce tasks, resulting in them running as the user who started the TaskTracker. > For security and accounting purposes the tasks should be run as the job-owner. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 05:21:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43152 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 05:21:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 05:21:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 14981 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 05:22:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14943 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 05:22:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14931 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 05:22:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:22:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:22:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D684A234C051 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1768250141.1248412934877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6164) Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct In-Reply-To: <1144829364.1248220514920.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734905#action_12734905 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6164: -------------------------------------------- filed a jira for trackin https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-502 tnx! > Test-patch's method of checking for new tests is not correct > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > > As happened in HDFS-458, test-patch/hudson saw the previous patch(HDFS-492) add a new test, bringing the total number of tests to 49. Then it tested 458, which had no new tests as it was a change to the build file. 492 had not yet been committed yet, so there were still only 48 tests in trunk. But test-patch failed the patch, expecting 49 tests. test-patch should check the correct number of tests based on trunk, not on whatever number it last saw. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 10:12:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65928 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 9612 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9563 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9540 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5C234C051 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1239173575.1248430394899.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6160: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6160.patch This patch is applicable for common, hdfs and mapred. > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 10:12:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65980 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 9706 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9629 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9541 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA70234C1E6 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1395439769.1248430394911.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735016#action_12735016 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------------------- can someone review this please? > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 10:12:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65991 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 10:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 9728 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9633 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9542 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:13:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1570234C1E9 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <307256804.1248430394922.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6160: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 17:57:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47283 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 17:57:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 17:57:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 16913 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:58:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16869 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 17:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16859 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 17:58:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:58:56 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AB4234C1EF for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1639348581.1248458295014.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735111#action_12735111 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------------ I tried your for-loop patch. It does not work. {noformat} bash-3.2$ ./bin/hdfs namenode java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/NameNode ... {noformat} > ... Have you tried it? If it works for you, can you post a patch? I have not tried it. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 19:44:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91243 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 19:44:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 19:44:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 70655 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70607 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70597 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68B234C004 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <698749201.1248464714897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5318) Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735138#action_12735138 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-5318: ------------------------------------- Given that we got the majority of speedup out of the CRC changes, I think we should resolve this ticket as wontfix. I just ran the same benchmark of trunk vs patched on my dual core laptop and the performance was essentially the same. On the Nehalem box it looked like there might have been a few percent speedup, but it seems not-worth-it for the added complexity. If anyone disagrees (or has a benchmark to back up this patch), please speak up. I'll upload an updated patch against trunk so people can give it a try. > Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Environment: 2x quad core xeon linux 64 bit > Reporter: Ben Maurer > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: buf.patch, buffer-output.patch, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, Rplot001.png, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java > > > The AtomicLong operations in counting file system statistics can cause high levels of contention with multiple threads. This test demonstrates having multiple threads writing to different sequence files: > {code:java} > import java.io.IOException; > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.ByteWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.CompressionType; > public class Test { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { > final Configuration c = new Configuration(); > final FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(c); > > final int NUM = 1000*1000; > for (int i = 0; i < Integer.valueOf(args[0]); i ++) { > final int ii = i; > new Thread(new Runnable() { > @Override > public void run() { > > try { > Writer f = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, c, new Path("/test/" + ii ), ByteWritable.class, ByteWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); > ByteWritable v = new ByteWritable(); > > long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); > for (int i = 0; i < NUM; i ++) > f.append(v, v); > f.close(); > long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > System.out.printf("%d opartions in %d msec. %f/second\n", NUM, end - time, (float)(1000 * NUM)/(end - time)); > > } catch (Exception e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > > } > }).start(); > } > } > } > {code} > The results of this benchmark are > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1431 msec. 698812.000000/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 3001 msec. 333222.250000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2985 msec. 335008.375000/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 4923 msec. 203128.171875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4924 msec. 203086.921875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4981 msec. 200762.906250/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 6716 msec. 148898.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 7048 msec. 141884.218750/second > 1000000 opartions in 7342 msec. 136202.671875/second > 1000000 opartions in 7344 msec. 136165.578125/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 10366 msec. 96469.226563/second > 1000000 opartions in 11085 msec. 90212.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 11121 msec. 89919.968750/second > 1000000 opartions in 11464 msec. 87229.585938/second > 1000000 opartions in 11538 msec. 86670.132813/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 16513 msec. 60558.347656/second > 1000000 opartions in 17704 msec. 56484.410156/second > 1000000 opartions in 18219 msec. 54887.753906/second > 1000000 opartions in 18550 msec. 53908.355469/second > 1000000 opartions in 18605 msec. 53748.992188/second > 1000000 opartions in 18663 msec. 53581.953125/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 22207 msec. 45030.847656/second > 1000000 opartions in 23275 msec. 42964.554688/second > 1000000 opartions in 23484 msec. 42582.183594/second > 1000000 opartions in 24378 msec. 41020.593750/second > 1000000 opartions in 24425 msec. 40941.656250/second > 1000000 opartions in 24533 msec. 40761.421875/second > 1000000 opartions in 24645 msec. 40576.183594/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 26375 msec. 37914.691406/second > 1000000 opartions in 26420 msec. 37850.113281/second > 1000000 opartions in 26532 msec. 37690.335938/second > 1000000 opartions in 26670 msec. 37495.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 29772 msec. 33588.605469/second > 1000000 opartions in 29859 msec. 33490.738281/second > 1000000 opartions in 30098 msec. 33224.800781/second > 1000000 opartions in 30082 msec. 33242.468750/second > {code} > However, if I comment out the file system statistics increments, the benchmark improves to: > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1194 msec. 837520.937500/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1639 msec. 610128.125000/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1899 msec. 526592.937500/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2065 msec. 484261.500000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2067 msec. 483792.937500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2151 msec. 464900.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2111 msec. 473709.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2153 msec. 464468.187500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2114 msec. 473036.906250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2113 msec. 473260.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2112 msec. 473484.843750/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2368 msec. 422297.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2334 msec. 428449.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2330 msec. 429184.562500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2375 msec. 421052.625000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2394 msec. 417710.937500/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2517 msec. 397298.375000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2539 msec. 393855.843750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2614 msec. 382555.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2666 msec. 375093.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2701 msec. 370233.250000/second > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 19:44:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91291 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 19:44:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 19:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 70734 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70690 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70680 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 19:45:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:45:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:45:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F54234C495 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <970895747.1248464715097.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5318) Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-5318: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5318.txt Patch against trunk common > Poor IO Performance due to AtomicLong operations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Environment: 2x quad core xeon linux 64 bit > Reporter: Ben Maurer > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: buf.patch, buffer-output.patch, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, hadoop-5318.txt, Rplot001.png, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java, TestWriteConcurrency.java > > > The AtomicLong operations in counting file system statistics can cause high levels of contention with multiple threads. This test demonstrates having multiple threads writing to different sequence files: > {code:java} > import java.io.IOException; > import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem; > import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.ByteWritable; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.Writer; > import org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile.CompressionType; > public class Test { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { > final Configuration c = new Configuration(); > final FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(c); > > final int NUM = 1000*1000; > for (int i = 0; i < Integer.valueOf(args[0]); i ++) { > final int ii = i; > new Thread(new Runnable() { > @Override > public void run() { > > try { > Writer f = SequenceFile.createWriter(fs, c, new Path("/test/" + ii ), ByteWritable.class, ByteWritable.class, CompressionType.NONE); > ByteWritable v = new ByteWritable(); > > long time = System.currentTimeMillis(); > for (int i = 0; i < NUM; i ++) > f.append(v, v); > f.close(); > long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > System.out.printf("%d opartions in %d msec. %f/second\n", NUM, end - time, (float)(1000 * NUM)/(end - time)); > > } catch (Exception e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > > } > }).start(); > } > } > } > {code} > The results of this benchmark are > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1431 msec. 698812.000000/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 3001 msec. 333222.250000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2985 msec. 335008.375000/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 4923 msec. 203128.171875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4924 msec. 203086.921875/second > 1000000 opartions in 4981 msec. 200762.906250/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 6716 msec. 148898.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 7048 msec. 141884.218750/second > 1000000 opartions in 7342 msec. 136202.671875/second > 1000000 opartions in 7344 msec. 136165.578125/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 10366 msec. 96469.226563/second > 1000000 opartions in 11085 msec. 90212.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 11121 msec. 89919.968750/second > 1000000 opartions in 11464 msec. 87229.585938/second > 1000000 opartions in 11538 msec. 86670.132813/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 16513 msec. 60558.347656/second > 1000000 opartions in 17704 msec. 56484.410156/second > 1000000 opartions in 18219 msec. 54887.753906/second > 1000000 opartions in 18550 msec. 53908.355469/second > 1000000 opartions in 18605 msec. 53748.992188/second > 1000000 opartions in 18663 msec. 53581.953125/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 22207 msec. 45030.847656/second > 1000000 opartions in 23275 msec. 42964.554688/second > 1000000 opartions in 23484 msec. 42582.183594/second > 1000000 opartions in 24378 msec. 41020.593750/second > 1000000 opartions in 24425 msec. 40941.656250/second > 1000000 opartions in 24533 msec. 40761.421875/second > 1000000 opartions in 24645 msec. 40576.183594/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 26375 msec. 37914.691406/second > 1000000 opartions in 26420 msec. 37850.113281/second > 1000000 opartions in 26532 msec. 37690.335938/second > 1000000 opartions in 26670 msec. 37495.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 29772 msec. 33588.605469/second > 1000000 opartions in 29859 msec. 33490.738281/second > 1000000 opartions in 30098 msec. 33224.800781/second > 1000000 opartions in 30082 msec. 33242.468750/second > {code} > However, if I comment out the file system statistics increments, the benchmark improves to: > {code} > ==== 1 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1194 msec. 837520.937500/second > ==== 2 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1433 msec. 697836.687500/second > ==== 3 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1643 msec. 608642.750000/second > 1000000 opartions in 1639 msec. 610128.125000/second > ==== 4 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1886 msec. 530222.687500/second > 1000000 opartions in 1899 msec. 526592.937500/second > ==== 5 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2065 msec. 484261.500000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2067 msec. 483792.937500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2066 msec. 484027.093750/second > ==== 6 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2151 msec. 464900.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2111 msec. 473709.156250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2153 msec. 464468.187500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2114 msec. 473036.906250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2113 msec. 473260.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2112 msec. 473484.843750/second > ==== 7 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2368 msec. 422297.312500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2334 msec. 428449.000000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2330 msec. 429184.562500/second > 1000000 opartions in 2332 msec. 428816.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2375 msec. 421052.625000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2394 msec. 417710.937500/second > ==== 8 threads ==== > 1000000 opartions in 2517 msec. 397298.375000/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2538 msec. 394011.031250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2539 msec. 393855.843750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2614 msec. 382555.468750/second > 1000000 opartions in 2666 msec. 375093.781250/second > 1000000 opartions in 2701 msec. 370233.250000/second > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 21:43:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30958 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 21:43:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 21:43:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 15855 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 21:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15811 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 21:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15797 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 21:44:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:44:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:44:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03BB234C004 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1150274237.1248471854902.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735175#action_12735175 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-4491: --------------------------------------- After a little playing around with Linux, it looks like it blocks using hard links for directories, even for root. *frown* That leaves us two options for dealing with the logs directory: 1. Create the files and make hard links on the files and make sure the files are appended to. 2. Use acls on the directories to limit access to just the mapred and job user. I'm leaning toward the second one. {noformat} $ttroot - mapred, 755 | |- jobs - mapred 755 | | | '-- $jobid - mapred 700 + rw access by $user | | | |- distcache - mapred 755 | |- jars - mapred 755 | | '-- job.jar | `-- $attemptid - mapred 755 | |- job.xml | |- taskjvm.sh | |- work - $user 700 | |- logs - $user 755 | `-- output - $user 755 '-- system | `-- $jobid | |- job.xml {noformat} So all of the protection is at the $jobid level. The user only has write access to the work, logs, and output directories. Thoughts? > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 24 22:22:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45869 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2009 22:22:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2009 22:22:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 43731 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 22:23:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43688 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2009 22:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43677 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2009 22:23:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:23:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:23:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9C2234C004 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1364409221.1248474195040.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6124) patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. In-Reply-To: <1339799848.1246409207795.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735189#action_12735189 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6124: ------------------------------------------------ HADOOP-6124.patch has some good changes for HADOOP-6077 but it did not fix the problem in this issue. {noformat} [exec] There appear to be 122 javac compiler warnings before the patch and 64 javac compiler warnings after applying the patch. {noformat} > patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6124 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6124 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Priority: Critical > Attachments: c6124_20090701.patch, HADOOP-6124.patch > > > The values of patchJavacWarnings and trunkJavacWarnings are not consistent when running test-patch.sh with an empty patch over Common. HDFS and MapReduce seem not having this problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 02:01:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9540 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 02:01:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 02:01:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 85730 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 02:02:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85621 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 02:02:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85511 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 02:02:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:02:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:02:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBA8234C046 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:02:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Removing deprecated method calls in TFile ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6169 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Hong Tang Priority: Minor We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 09:27:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98857 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 09:27:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 09:27:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 25320 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:28:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25274 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25264 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 09:28:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:28:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:28:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2040234C004 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1305824929.1248514094780.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:28:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6169: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 09:31:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1404 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 09:31:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 09:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 25911 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:32:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25867 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25857 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 09:32:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:32:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:32:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1366F234C004 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <418718750.1248514335064.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:32:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang reassigned HADOOP-6169: --------------------------------- Assignee: Hong Tang > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 09:45:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6994 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 09:45:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 09:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 33212 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33166 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33155 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 09:46:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:46:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:46:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC2234C004 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2095452071.1248515174783.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735255#action_12735255 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6169: ----------------------------------- test-patch output: [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 09:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7992 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 09:47:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 09:47:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 36150 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36106 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 09:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36096 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 09:48:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:48:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 09:48:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E96234C004 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1721978382.1248515294804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6169: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Trivial patch that eliminates the use of deprecated apis. I also fixed a few findbugs warnings along the way. > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jul 25 13:39:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66838 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2009 13:39:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 13:39:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 40470 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 13:40:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40425 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2009 13:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40415 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2009 13:40:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:40:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:40:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AFC234C004 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <442782326.1248529216117.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735272#action_12735272 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------------------ bq. Use acls on the directories to limit access to just the mapred and job user. Are you referring to the ACLs that use extended attributes on the file system. Their support should be explicitly enabled in the kernel, and also supported by the file system type, right ? If yes, doesn't this approach make the utility of this feature much more restrictive ? It seems like option 1 is a slightly better option in that case... > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jul 26 12:40:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59287 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2009 12:40:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2009 12:40:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 39594 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 12:41:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39567 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 12:41:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39557 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2009 12:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:41:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4697A234C004 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1446874848.1248612075274.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:41:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5879) GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] He Yongqiang updated HADOOP-5879: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-5879-7-26.patch hadoop-5879-7-26.patch incorporates all Chris's suggestions (Thanks for the detailed comments, Chris!). I have to admit that the testcase can not fully verify the functionality. And to know that it works, what i did was by looking the log and debugging in my IDE. Please let me know if you know how we can test it automatically. > GzipCodec should read compression level etc from configuration > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5879 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5879 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Zheng Shao > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Attachments: hadoop-5879-5-21.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-2.patch, hadoop-5879-7-13-3.patch, hadoop-5879-7-18-3.patch, hadoop-5879-7-26.patch > > > GzipCodec currently uses the default compression level. We should allow overriding the default value from Configuration. > {code} > static final class GzipZlibCompressor extends ZlibCompressor { > public GzipZlibCompressor() { > super(ZlibCompressor.CompressionLevel.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionStrategy.DEFAULT_STRATEGY, > ZlibCompressor.CompressionHeader.GZIP_FORMAT, 64*1024); > } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 05:27:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54024 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 05:27:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 05:27:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 7897 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 05:28:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7851 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 05:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7841 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 05:28:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:28:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:28:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3845234C04B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1585515553.1248672494865.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:28:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735467#action_12735467 ] Edward J. Yoon commented on HADOOP-5988: ---------------------------------------- Do you mean the "-stat" option of 'ls' command? > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 05:35:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57724 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 05:35:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 05:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 8893 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 05:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8845 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 05:36:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8830 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 05:36:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:36:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:36:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CF2234C004 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1128261947.1248672975198.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:36:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735469#action_12735469 ] He Yongqiang commented on HADOOP-5988: -------------------------------------- yeah. like "hadoop dfs -stat %B path_to_file". > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 06:17:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75377 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 06:17:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 06:17:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 39557 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 06:18:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39496 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 06:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39473 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 06:18:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:18:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:18:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE47234C052 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <460680504.1248675494955.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735490#action_12735490 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6123: ---------------------------------------- bq. I tried your for-loop patch. It does not work. It works for me with latest trunk. By any chance you are running the command in common itself ? It should be run in HDFS. See my [comment |https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?focusedCommentId=12725932&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12725932] above. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 06:55:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93082 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 06:55:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 06:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 57531 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 06:56:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57485 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 06:56:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57475 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 06:56:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:56:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:56:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7D234C046 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <660573122.1248677775237.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:56:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6105: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6105.patch Uploading the patch > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Attachments: HADOOP-6105.patch > > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 06:59:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93769 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 06:59:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 06:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 59439 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 07:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59395 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 07:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59385 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 07:00:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:00:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:00:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF9C234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1221739052.1248678014826.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735498#action_12735498 ] Edward J. Yoon commented on HADOOP-5988: ---------------------------------------- I see. I tried using getFileBlockLocations(). BlockLocation[] locations = srcFs.getFileBlockLocations(f, 0, f.getLen()); for(int ii = 0; ii < locations.length; ii++) { buf.append(locations[ii].toString()); } But, I can't get a blockid. Should I use the DFSClient? > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 07:19:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97248 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 07:19:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 07:19:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 69877 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 07:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69831 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 07:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69821 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 07:20:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:20:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3307234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1443371822.1248679214853.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735508#action_12735508 ] He Yongqiang commented on HADOOP-5988: -------------------------------------- DFSClient is from hdfs, and FsShell is in common. After project splitting, it becomes difficuty to modify the core and hdfs at the same time. And FsShell should works for all file systems, which DFSClient is only for hdfs. I think if can not get blocks' ids, sortting the output according to byte-range is pretty much the same. > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:08:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9971 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:08:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:08:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 8870 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:09:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8817 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8807 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:09:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:09:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:09:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4CE234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <469525524.1248682154897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward J. Yoon updated HADOOP-5988: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-5988.patch OK, thanks for your comments. Attach my patch. > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Attachments: HADOOP-5988.patch > > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:16:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12062 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:16:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:16:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 13321 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13275 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13265 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:17:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCEC234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1899776844.1248682635105.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6162) MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables In-Reply-To: <1542829149.1246995374880.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735517#action_12735517 ] Sharad Agarwal commented on HADOOP-6162: ---------------------------------------- Few comments on the patch: There are lot of javac warnings. We should get rid of them. Tests for ArrayFile, BloomMapFile and SetFile also should be added to their respective junit tests. Should we deprecate constructors takings Writables ? > MapFile doesn't work with serializables other than Writables > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Justin Patterson > Attachments: HADOOP-6162.patch > > > Since 0.18 (I think), SequenceFiles have supported serializing arbitrary objects through the serialization framework. MapFiles still don't. They require WritableComparable keys and Writable values. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:20:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12574 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:20:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:20:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 16004 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:21:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15955 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:21:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15945 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:21:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:21:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEB5234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2062775542.1248682874850.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735519#action_12735519 ] He Yongqiang commented on HADOOP-5988: -------------------------------------- I think the patch can work for normal situations. can you give some example outputs? like: stat a local path, stat a hdfs path, stat a non-exist path, stat a directory etc. For more eaier to read, i think the output should be indented (especially the byte range part), what do you think? > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Attachments: HADOOP-5988.patch > > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:24:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13061 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18465 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:25:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18416 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:25:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18406 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:25:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:25:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:25:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9AA234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <30399517.1248683114827.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:25:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6153.patch 1. To merge RAGzip with GzipCodec class, I add a method 'getDecompressorForRandomAccess(...)' to GzipCodec class. This method return the Decompressor for random access. 2. I add the '-makeap' option that is FS Shell Command. This option supports to make the access point of the gzip. > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:28:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13946 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:28:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 20450 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:29:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20404 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:29:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20394 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:29:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:29:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:29:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DE2234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <83024448.1248683354891.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Work started: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HADOOP-6153 started by Daehyun Kim. > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:30:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14499 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:30:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:30:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 21783 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21697 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21675 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F505234C055 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1752372067.1248683475061.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:30:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14497 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:30:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:30:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 21762 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21695 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21674 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:31:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF32D234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <714407519.1248683474847.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ramya R (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735523#action_12735523 ] Ramya R commented on HADOOP-6160: --------------------------------- +1. Patch looks fine. > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:45:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17406 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:45:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:45:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 31091 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:46:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31042 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:46:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31032 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:46:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:46:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:46:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9195234C04C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1958067341.1248684374888.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735530#action_12735530 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------------------- this patch runs rats-ant task the release binary excluding docs and lib/jdiff dirs. Will file follow up jiras to add AL headers for files missing them and hence we can reduce the releaseaudit warnings count to zero. > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 08:47:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17724 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 08:47:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 08:47:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 32091 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:48:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32042 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 08:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32028 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 08:48:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:48:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:48:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C0B234C1F0 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <692750034.1248684495092.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:48:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 09:02:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20495 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 09:02:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 09:02:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 44285 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 09:03:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44250 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 09:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44240 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 09:03:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:03:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C818C234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1688398539.1248685394803.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735534#action_12735534 ] Edward J. Yoon commented on HADOOP-5988: ---------------------------------------- Thanks for your review. I'll check them. >> For more eaier to read, i think the output should be indented (especially the byte range part), what do you think? And, I agree with you. Below is the output of the '# bin/hadoop fs -stat %B tmp/src.tar.gz'. ---- 09/07/27 17:50:01 WARN conf.Configuration: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Usage of hadoop-site.xml is deprecated. Instead use core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml to override properties of core-default.xml, mapred-default.xml and hdfs-default.xml respectively byte-range:0-67108864 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:67108864-134217728 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:134217728-201326592 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:201326592-268435456 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:268435456-335544320 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:335544320-402653184 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:402653184-469762048 location:dev1.nm; byte-range:469762048-517866001 location:dev1.nm; > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Attachments: HADOOP-5988.patch > > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 09:44:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34373 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 09:44:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 09:44:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 71768 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 09:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71742 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 09:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71732 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 09:45:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:45:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFDD234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2109969689.1248687914819.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735540#action_12735540 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6160: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414427/HADOOP-6160.patch against trunk revision 797300. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/584/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/584/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/584/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/584/console This message is automatically generated. > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 10:12:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48066 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 10:12:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 10:12:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 14228 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 10:13:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14207 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 10:13:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14197 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 10:13:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:13:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:13:37 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D46234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <829820393.1248689594848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6160: --------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) this patch doesn't requires a test as this just changes to the build.xml file. I just committed this! > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 10:18:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50319 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 10:18:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 10:18:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 21632 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 10:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21605 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 10:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21595 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 10:19:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:19:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC76234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1805123261.1248689954819.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "rahul k singh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735552#action_12735552 ] rahul k singh commented on HADOOP-6105: --------------------------------------- Changes look good , some minor comments: Configuration.java 1.Check for null in addDeprecation method. 2.Some extra lines are there in front of some of the methods , remove them 3.Try to use foreach kind of syntax where ever possible.It makes code look simpler. TestConfiguration.java 1.In tearDown method , you should delete the test-config.xml file also 2.make sure that CONFIG3 is deleted. 1.Diff has Index: junitvmwatcher8758949811953274592.properties I dont think it is required. Diff also has test-config3.xml i think this is becoz of CONFIG3 not being deleted in testcase. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Attachments: HADOOP-6105.patch > > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 11:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65066 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 11:10:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 11:10:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 83360 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83324 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83314 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 11:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:11:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E0A234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1222099290.1248693075198.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735560#action_12735560 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #36 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/36/]) . Fix ant releaseaudit target to run on specific directories. (Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan) > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 12:30:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89426 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 12:30:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 12:30:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 77824 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 12:31:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77775 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 12:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77765 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 12:31:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:31:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:31:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BB6234C051 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1624044572.1248697875530.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:31:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735585#action_12735585 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #31 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/31/]) . Fix ant releaseaudit target to run on specific directories. (Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan) > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 12:41:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92656 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 12:41:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 12:41:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 94056 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 12:42:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94014 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 12:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93996 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 12:42:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:42:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:42:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C15234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1539622322.1248698534855.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735590#action_12735590 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6123: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12412236/6123_v1.patch against trunk revision 798093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/586/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/586/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/586/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/586/console This message is automatically generated. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 13:03:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 691 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 13:03:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 13:03:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24354 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 13:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24314 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 13:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24304 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 13:04:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:04:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E582B234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <332025333.1248699854939.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735598#action_12735598 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6169: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414508/hadoop-6169-20090725.patch against trunk revision 798093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/588/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/588/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/588/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/588/console This message is automatically generated. > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 15:44:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94083 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 15:44:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 15:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 70162 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 15:45:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70117 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 15:45:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70075 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 15:45:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:45:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2B234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <645941162.1248709515150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:45:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6160) releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary In-Reply-To: <1162830772.1247830035100.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735630#action_12735630 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6160: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #31 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/31/]) . Fix ant releaseaudit target to run on specific directories. (Contributed by Giridharan Kesavan) > releaseaudit (rats) should not be run againt the entire release binary > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6160.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 15:48:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95578 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 15:48:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 15:48:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 72229 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 15:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72188 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 15:49:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72178 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 15:49:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:49:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:49:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BB2234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <625452059.1248709754840.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735632#action_12735632 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6153: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414595/HADOOP-6153.patch against trunk revision 798093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/589/console This message is automatically generated. > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 17:25:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28184 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 17:25:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 17:25:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 15033 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15003 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14838 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 17:26:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:26:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BA5234C051 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <409673876.1248715575002.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735669#action_12735669 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-4491: ------------------------------------------ Owen and I had an offline discussion about this, and we felt another approach to try out was to see if we could have the directories and files owned by the user and group-owned by the tasktracker. The group ownership should be sticky so permissions are inherited. The permissions must apply for all the relevant components in the paths. So, $jobid and $attemptid in the examples above would be owned by the user, group-owned by mapred, and have permissions like 570 or similar. This might also remove the need to have parallel directory structures. The rationale for this approach follows from the fact that for maximum security the task-controller executable needs to be group owned by the tasktracker (to prevent other users from launching it). Hence, this almost means that the tasktracker user is a special user in the system that is required for secure installations. And it can be setup such that the user is in a separate group on its own. Thoughts ? > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 17:43:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41631 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 17:43:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 17:43:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30999 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 17:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30954 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 17:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30944 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 17:44:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:44:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:44:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D738C234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <113189766.1248716654867.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735680#action_12735680 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-5438: -------------------------------------- > It's too bad Java won't automatically convert a single enum into an enumset when necessary. We could use a variable arity parameter, e.g.: FSDataOutputStream create(Path file, CreateFlag... flags); > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 18:30:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78055 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 18:30:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 81999 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:31:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81956 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:31:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81944 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 18:31:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:31:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:31:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A7A234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1248416554.1248719474811.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Tried again the patch. It worked fine. I probably did something wrong last time. Since the for-loop approach is already used in hadoop-config.sh, we should keep the new codes consistent with the existing codes. +1 patch looks good. > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 18:36:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81680 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 18:36:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:36:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92853 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:37:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92804 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 18:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92794 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 18:37:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:37:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:37:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3492234C04B for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1678565713.1248719834930.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6123: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) No new tests since this is a script change. I have committed this. Thanks, Sharad! > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 19:06:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91674 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 19:06:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 19:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 34303 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 19:07:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34258 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 19:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34248 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 19:07:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:07:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026CF234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1776381968.1248721634994.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:07:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c6166_20090727.patch Not yet able to improve PureJavaCrc32 in my 64-bit machine but had a lot of fun last weekends. c6166_20090727.patch: moved the codes to common (finally). Please try it when you have time. - 64-bit java.version = 1.6.0_10 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_10-b33 java.vm.version = 11.0-b15 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp ||num bytes||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32New MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_5_5 MB/sec||Crc32_6_6 MB/sec||Crc32_8_8 MB/sec||Crc32_12_12 MB/sec|| | 8 | 157.986 | 102.628 | 135.926 | 204.207 | 218.584 | 239.862 | 253.886 | 213.072 | | 16 | 245.381 | 214.363 | 238.798 | 202.284 | 261.246 | 207.342 | 219.935 | 245.648 | | 32 | 331.296 | 290.766 | 283.689 | 218.582 | 310.499 | 329.800 | 283.757 | 273.074 | | 64 | 405.822 | 345.573 | 325.067 | 224.623 | 344.732 | 345.010 | 311.538 | 346.970 | | 128 | 451.240 | 378.875 | 343.498 | 226.853 | 391.824 | 392.462 | 323.504 | 391.573 | | 256 | 479.728 | 410.574 | 352.432 | 226.939 | 416.448 | 396.344 | 331.537 | 415.233 | | 512 | 488.917 | 425.214 | 355.640 | 227.120 | 424.109 | 409.781 | 335.965 | 427.655 | | 1024 | 499.820 | 433.135 | 358.441 | 225.953 | 430.212 | 414.286 | 337.652 | 431.440 | | 2048 | 504.199 | 438.373 | 352.913 | 223.754 | 435.921 | 417.888 | 339.190 | 438.454 | | 4096 | 509.100 | 441.553 | 351.305 | 222.355 | 438.667 | 420.657 | 341.057 | 441.063 | | 8192 | 511.632 | 439.242 | 352.058 | 222.469 | 439.568 | 422.009 | 341.427 | 447.972 | | 16384 | 510.829 | 444.631 | 354.097 | 222.488 | 439.707 | 419.661 | 341.200 | 451.286 | | 32768 | 507.353 | 437.758 | 354.601 | 222.503 | 436.775 | 416.266 | 339.704 | 449.830 | | 65536 | 507.335 | 434.042 | 354.837 | 222.682 | 436.742 | 417.825 | 339.761 | 449.868 | | 131072 | 507.473 | 431.449 | 355.014 | 222.748 | 436.477 | 417.910 | 339.835 | 449.958 | | 262144 | 507.548 | 429.451 | 354.932 | 222.632 | 436.698 | 417.783 | 339.852 | 449.936 | | 524288 | 507.322 | 428.618 | 355.142 | 222.491 | 436.584 | 417.715 | 339.826 | 450.146 | | 1048576 | 507.148 | 428.778 | 354.769 | 222.534 | 436.506 | 417.819 | 339.830 | 450.032 | | 2097152 | 506.610 | 432.981 | 354.596 | 222.261 | 436.080 | 417.573 | 339.933 | 449.623 | | 4194304 | 504.503 | 432.501 | 352.918 | 221.669 | 432.956 | 414.626 | 337.668 | 445.489 | | 8388608 | 498.208 | 428.943 | 348.488 | 219.868 | 429.455 | 411.497 | 335.448 | 440.899 | | 16777216 | 497.184 | 423.245 | 348.105 | 219.657 | 427.288 | 410.788 | 334.992 | 440.603 | - 32-bit java.version = 1.6.0_14 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_14-b08 java.vm.version = 14.0-b16 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = x86 os.name = Windows XP os.version = 5.1 ||num bytes||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32New MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_5_5 MB/sec||Crc32_6_6 MB/sec||Crc32_8_8 MB/sec||Crc32_12_12 MB/sec|| | 8 | 192.776 | 167.821 | 174.386 | 207.658 | 184.504 | 196.480 | 222.191 | 155.052 | | 16 | 227.810 | 212.454 | 224.370 | 250.812 | 236.371 | 229.370 | 267.719 | 248.392 | | 32 | 250.230 | 239.881 | 251.688 | 280.112 | 257.619 | 270.357 | 298.951 | 268.026 | | 64 | 263.695 | 257.785 | 275.683 | 296.554 | 269.474 | 284.615 | 316.642 | 319.204 | | 128 | 270.873 | 266.500 | 286.942 | 305.744 | 282.172 | 298.166 | 325.899 | 325.806 | | 256 | 282.205 | 270.751 | 294.155 | 306.224 | 288.460 | 303.445 | 330.728 | 342.959 | | 512 | 282.529 | 270.063 | 295.103 | 309.134 | 290.043 | 300.008 | 332.325 | 343.466 | | 1024 | 279.710 | 273.680 | 298.489 | 308.905 | 289.993 | 305.850 | 331.706 | 347.761 | | 2048 | 279.753 | 274.073 | 293.911 | 304.972 | 285.538 | 308.030 | 334.459 | 350.296 | | 4096 | 278.830 | 275.688 | 290.520 | 302.634 | 293.201 | 308.455 | 334.498 | 351.761 | | 8192 | 279.518 | 274.829 | 289.088 | 299.036 | 292.383 | 305.940 | 333.512 | 352.584 | | 16384 | 278.609 | 251.000 | 287.964 | 303.862 | 293.782 | 308.534 | 333.397 | 347.889 | | 32768 | 276.124 | 272.805 | 290.125 | 300.458 | 289.993 | 306.447 | 334.985 | 350.833 | | 65536 | 274.212 | 273.606 | 288.872 | 303.673 | 286.457 | 307.196 | 332.591 | 349.273 | | 131072 | 275.371 | 272.257 | 289.985 | 303.490 | 289.126 | 303.128 | 330.630 | 349.575 | | 262144 | 275.607 | 273.878 | 288.080 | 302.439 | 285.862 | 304.965 | 330.775 | 347.044 | | 524288 | 274.578 | 270.549 | 286.745 | 299.832 | 287.063 | 304.299 | 332.160 | 346.131 | | 1048576 | 270.002 | 272.333 | 285.866 | 299.702 | 284.005 | 304.845 | 329.455 | 343.377 | | 2097152 | 268.254 | 265.650 | 285.905 | 297.428 | 286.168 | 302.749 | 329.962 | 344.515 | | 4194304 | 272.093 | 268.692 | 285.552 | 299.619 | 285.262 | 299.311 | 327.311 | 338.847 | | 8388608 | 268.156 | 265.971 | 283.967 | 291.225 | 282.974 | 301.162 | 323.698 | 343.482 | | 16777216 | 271.428 | 270.893 | 285.939 | 299.171 | 284.946 | 302.520 | 328.465 | 343.694 | > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt, c6166_20090727.patch > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 22:11:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80035 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 22:11:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 22:11:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 87078 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 22:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87032 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 22:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87022 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 22:12:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:12:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EC0234C04C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <704093981.1248732734887.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735806#action_12735806 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------------ Got a different story after updated to the latest jdk. java.version = 1.6.0_14 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_14-b08 java.vm.version = 14.0-b16 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp ||num bytes||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32New MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_5_5 MB/sec||Crc32_6_6 MB/sec||Crc32_8_8 MB/sec||Crc32_12_12 MB/sec|| | 8 | 190.202 | 170.445 | 170.560 | 228.872 | 215.769 | 206.454 | 231.685 | 214.802 | | 16 | 257.234 | 209.434 | 225.336 | 267.450 | 263.165 | 187.785 | 253.917 | 232.935 | | 32 | 309.992 | 271.358 | 243.099 | 309.840 | 309.997 | 304.166 | 319.013 | 270.716 | | 64 | 348.461 | 326.343 | 265.435 | 338.049 | 330.947 | 333.372 | 358.959 | 334.240 | | 128 | 369.745 | 362.989 | 271.531 | 354.615 | 382.880 | 371.822 | 383.919 | 370.870 | | 256 | 382.773 | 385.201 | 279.028 | 364.379 | 402.521 | 378.506 | 400.110 | 399.904 | | 512 | 384.597 | 397.015 | 279.898 | 364.408 | 406.135 | 389.814 | 407.351 | 405.674 | | 1024 | 390.181 | 405.577 | 281.035 | 364.413 | 412.159 | 395.506 | 408.046 | 416.599 | | 2048 | 392.820 | 408.548 | 275.382 | 360.259 | 412.941 | 395.982 | 409.498 | 422.795 | | 4096 | 392.362 | 408.593 | 273.375 | 355.012 | 414.489 | 397.885 | 410.857 | 422.115 | | 8192 | 393.152 | 409.355 | 273.973 | 355.846 | 415.358 | 398.532 | 411.701 | 423.370 | | 16384 | 393.094 | 409.406 | 274.759 | 355.500 | 415.657 | 398.542 | 411.813 | 422.864 | | 32768 | 392.515 | 408.989 | 276.169 | 357.135 | 415.965 | 400.295 | 411.622 | 422.887 | | 65536 | 393.323 | 408.997 | 276.594 | 357.448 | 416.075 | 400.896 | 411.966 | 422.850 | | 131072 | 393.531 | 408.982 | 276.566 | 357.490 | 416.059 | 400.959 | 412.037 | 422.953 | | 262144 | 393.638 | 409.070 | 276.585 | 357.407 | 416.030 | 401.040 | 412.046 | 423.034 | | 524288 | 393.629 | 408.982 | 276.511 | 357.462 | 416.123 | 400.994 | 411.924 | 423.010 | | 1048576 | 393.652 | 408.943 | 276.397 | 357.050 | 415.844 | 400.785 | 411.927 | 422.808 | | 2097152 | 393.408 | 408.558 | 276.024 | 356.452 | 415.633 | 400.296 | 411.594 | 422.426 | | 4194304 | 391.575 | 405.148 | 275.157 | 354.772 | 413.680 | 397.834 | 409.809 | 420.100 | | 8388608 | 389.204 | 404.179 | 273.648 | 351.896 | 411.007 | 395.309 | 407.030 | 417.661 | | 16777216 | 388.753 | 403.422 | 273.343 | 351.298 | 410.380 | 394.783 | 406.396 | 416.995 | The above table makes more sense since it is easy to tell from the codes that Crc32_N_N for N > 4 is more efficient than PureJavaCrc32 (i.e. Crc32_4_4). Note that N cannot be increased arbitrary. Otherwise, the tables may not fit into the cpu cache as explained previously by Scott. (Tried Crc32_16_16 but it got worst.) As shown above, Crc32_12_12 has 7% and 26% improvement on my 64-bit and 32-bit machines with jdk 1.6.0_14-b08, respectively. I cannot explain why the numbers were generally better in 1.6.0_10-b33, 64-bit vm. Specific jdk feature/bug? > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt, c6166_20090727.patch > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jul 27 23:55:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11290 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2009 23:55:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 23:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 57235 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 23:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57192 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2009 23:56:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57177 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2009 23:56:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:56:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:56:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3B3234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1423769270.1248738974821.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735846#action_12735846 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-6167: -------------------------------------- bq. how does this not work? I agree with ryan. It does work as is (at least in our environment). If the goal is to make it look better, I'm fine. In our rhel environment, jvm gives preference to latter if argument is provided twice. > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop, hadoop-script.diff > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 00:37:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26023 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 00:37:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 00:37:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 80173 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 00:38:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80105 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 00:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79833 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 00:38:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:38:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:38:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B846234C04C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1550479875.1248741495111.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fernando (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735857#action_12735857 ] Fernando commented on HADOOP-6167: ---------------------------------- Ok. So is this -Xmx behavior documented? I guess not, but I guess it is working without any code change.. so you can mark this bug as "invalid" or some such.. sorry for the confusion. > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop, hadoop-script.diff > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 01:15:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40381 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 01:15:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 01:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6549 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 01:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6519 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 01:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6473 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 01:16:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:16:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:16:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00B5234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <601879567.1248743774916.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-2851) Bogus logging messages in Configration object constructors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-2851. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix Seem that this is not needed. Closing this as "Won't Fix". > Bogus logging messages in Configration object constructors > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-2851 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2851 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.16.0 > Reporter: Jingkei Ly > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: 2851_20080925.patch, 2851_20081103.patch > > > The constructors for the Configuration object contains a superfluous logging message that logs an IOException whenever logging is enabled for the debug level. Basically both constructors have the statement: > if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) { > LOG.debug(StringUtils.stringifyException(new IOException("config()"))); > } > I can' t see any reason for it to be there and it just ends up leaving bogus IOExceptions in log files. It looks like its an old debug print statement which has accidentally been left in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 01:41:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58825 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 01:41:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 01:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19132 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 01:42:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19049 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 01:42:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19035 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 01:42:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:42:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68029234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <975819897.1248745335411.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6167) bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type In-Reply-To: <128618595.1248313995284.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735884#action_12735884 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6167: ------------------------------------- Having -Xmx listed multiple times is misleading and confusing. It should be listed once, preferably near the beginning. Using tools like 'top' with the front of the command line printed shouldn't lie. IMO listing things as important as -Xmx twice is a bad idea regardless of the actual behavior. > bin/hadoop script doesn't allow for different memory settings for each daemon type > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Fernando > Attachments: hadoop, hadoop-script.diff > > > bin/hadoop assumes that all daemon types ( namenode, datanode, jobtracker, tasktracker ), all use the same memory settings.. (HADOOP_HEAPSIZE). > I propose changes to that script to allow overriding the default memory ( HADOOP_HEAPSIZE ), with daemon specific OPTS (HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS, etc ). > Basically at the bottom of the bin/hadoop script, it will check to see if the user has already set "-Xmx" in the HADOOP_OPTS variable.. if so, then it will ignore the JAVA_HEAP_SIZE variable.. > as such: > # run it > if [[ $HADOOP_OPTS == *-Xmx* ]]; then > exec "$JAVA" $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > else > exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS -classpath "$CLASSPATH" $CLASS "$@" > fi > I will attach the file as I have modified it.. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 03:55:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5521 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 03:55:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 03:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 58104 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 02:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58056 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 02:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58046 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 02:56:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:56:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:56:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AF7234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1809798463.1248749774852.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5988) Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward J. Yoon updated HADOOP-5988: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-5988_v01.patch I just changed output like this. {code} [root@udanax hadoop-common-trunk]# bin/hadoop fs -stat %B tmp/aa.tar 09/07/28 11:48:26 WARN conf.Configuration: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Usage of hadoop-site.xml is deprecated. Instead use core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml to override properties of core-default.xml, mapred-default.xml and hdfs-default.xml respectively +----------------------------------+ | byte-range:0-67108864 | | location:udanax.org; | +----------------------------------+ | byte-range:67108864-134217728 | | location:udanax.org; | +----------------------------------+ .. +----------------------------------+ | byte-range:2147483648-2165155840 | | location:udanax.org; | +----------------------------------+ [root@udanax hadoop-common-trunk]# bin/hadoop fs -stat %B tmp/aa.ta 09/07/28 11:50:00 WARN conf.Configuration: DEPRECATED: hadoop-site.xml found in the classpath. Usage of hadoop-site.xml is deprecated. Instead use core-site.xml, mapred-site.xml and hdfs-site.xml to override properties of core-default.xml, mapred-default.xml and hdfs-default.xml respectively stat: cannot stat `tmp/aa.ta': No such file or directory {code} > Add a command to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Attachments: HADOOP-5988.patch, HADOOP-5988_v01.patch > > > Adding an option to ' FsShell stat ' to get a file's block location information will be very useful. > we can print the block location information in this format: > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; > blockID:XXXXX byte-range:YYYY-ZZZZ location:dn1;dn2; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 03:56:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5689 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 03:56:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 03:56:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 91562 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91518 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91508 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 03:57:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:57:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72F6234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23700578.1248753434801.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735908#action_12735908 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------- For the 32 bit results, try passing -server on the command line. It behaves quite differently with loop unrolling and certain low level optimizations in the JIT versus -client (which is only default on 32 bit windows, and anyone who would run Hadoop there and wanted better performance would pass -server to speed it up). Are you specifying a -Xmx memory value? What about -Xms? On windows with -client, the VM has unusual default memory and GC values, I've found that setting its NewRatio more like the other platforms helps a lot: -XX:NewRatio=4 or something like that may make your results more consistent across the platforms (and faster on 32 bit windows). On my environment, on the previous set of tests, changing from _10 to _12 to _14 on JDK6 did not seem to do much. But I was manually setting -Xmx512m for all of my tests. I can try again later, but there is something odd about the results slowing down so much on the 1.6.0_14 version. It is also curious that the PureJavaCrc32New -- which only changes the loop style --also slows down but not as much as the older PureJavaCrc32 and goes from always about 15% slower to a little bit faster. My guess is something configuration related has changed with respect to some default JVM settings. I think there may be some improvement possible in the 8_8 case in how the 9 XORs at the end are done. Perhaps all in one line? or in 3 sets of 3? Or more likely the compiler is smart enough to do the register optimization itself? Perhaps not, Intel's C code even avoids a single line with more than 4 XORs at once for some reason. > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt, c6166_20090727.patch > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 04:59:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13436 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 04:59:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 04:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 26751 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:00:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26708 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26698 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 05:00:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:00:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:00:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA8234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1452364760.1248757214789.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6153.patch) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 05:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14125 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 05:07:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 05:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30393 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30347 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30337 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53656234C1E6 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2019488582.1248757695340.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 05:07:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14156 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 05:07:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 05:07:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30463 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30415 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30378 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59649234C1EB for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <941098028.1248757695365.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 05:07:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14208 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 05:07:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 05:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 30710 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30499 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30479 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 05:08:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4AE234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1006199778.1248757695226.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:08:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daehyun Kim (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daehyun Kim updated HADOOP-6153: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6153.patch My patch brings the hunk error. I think the reason I copied the text of the patch in my linux terminal and pasted the text to notepad. > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 05:59:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21170 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 05:59:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 05:59:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 63502 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 06:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63454 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 06:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63444 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 06:00:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:00:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:00:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCDC234C046 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1570876304.1248760814965.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:00:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "He Yongqiang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5438) Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735950#action_12735950 ] He Yongqiang commented on HADOOP-5438: -------------------------------------- {quote} If there weren't so many different create methods, I would suggest having one each for just the Enum value and and equivalent one that takes an enumset, so that if you just wanted to overwrite you could just use the one that takes the enum, and the convenience method would jam it into an enumset. It's too bad Java won't automatically convert a single enum into an enumset when necessary. {quote} Agree. It will be better we can provide a create method which takes one CreateFlag enum value and equivalent one that takes an enumset (i think it's already there). But how about the other already existing create methods? Remove them? And this will be a incompatible change. >>We could use a variable arity parameter, e.g.: FSDataOutputStream create(Path file, CreateFlag... flags); This is a very good suggestion. some programmer(like me) does not use EnumSet.of() very often. But the situation can be mitigated if we provide a method that accept one CreateFlag parameter. > Merge FileSystem.create and FileSystem.append > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5438 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5438 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: He Yongqiang > Assignee: He Yongqiang > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-5438(2009-04-06).patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-30.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31-2.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-03-31.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-10.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-15.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-19.patch, Hadoop-5438-2009-05-5.patch > > > Currently, when a user wants to modify a file, the user first calls exists() to know if this file is already there. And then uses create() or append() according to whether the file exists or not. > the code looks like: > {code} > FSDataOutputStream out_1 = null; > if (fs.exists(path_1)) > out_1 = fs.append(path_1); > else > out_1 = fs.create(path_1); > {code} > . On the performace side,It involes two RPCs. On the easy-of-use side, it is not very convient in contrast to the traditional open interface. > It will more complicate if there is a overwrite parameter specified. I donot know whether there is a bug about 'overwrite' in 0.19, some times it takes a long time for overwrite creates to reture. So i make the write file code with overwrite param works like: > {code} > boolean exists = fs.exists(name); > if (overwrite) { > if (exists) > fs.delete(name, true); > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, replication, > blockSize, progress); > this.currentRowID = 0; > } else { > if (!exists) > this.out = fs.create(name, overwrite, bufferSize, > replication, blockSize, progress); > else > this.out = fs.append(name, bufferSize, progress); > {code} > Some code statements there are really redundant and not needed, especialy with the delete(). But without deleting first, the overwrite takes a long time to reture. > BTW, i will create another issue about the overwrite problem. If it is not a bug at all or a duplicate, someone please close it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 07:19:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9940 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 07:19:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 07:19:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 13649 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 06:53:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13603 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 06:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13593 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 06:53:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:53:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:53:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E32234C044 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1466861872.1248763994861.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6153) RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file In-Reply-To: <926568478.1247710994848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735962#action_12735962 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6153: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12414706/HADOOP-6153.patch against trunk revision 798247. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/590/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/590/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/590/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/590/console This message is automatically generated. > RAgzip: multiple map tasks for a large gzipped file > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, native > Environment: It requires zlib 1.2.2.4 or higher. (We tested on zlib 1.2.3) > Reporter: Daehyun Kim > Assignee: Daehyun Kim > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6153.patch > > > It support to enable multiple map tasks for one large gzipped file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 08:22:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32875 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 08:22:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 08:22:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 89040 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 08:23:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88993 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 08:23:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88983 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 08:23:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:23:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:23:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A19234C044 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1756655081.1248769394844.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4491) Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12735980#action_12735980 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4491: ----------------------------------- Going forward with the latest proposal. Salient points: - Same directory structure as what is in the trunk. - Actions taken up the linux-taskcontroller: -- initializeJob --- sudo chown user:mapred -R taskTracker/jobcache/$jobid --- sudo chmod 570 -R taskTracker/jobcache/$jobid -- initializeTask --- sudo chown user:mapred -R taskTracker/jobcache/$jobid/$attemptid/ --- sudo chmod 770 -R taskTracker/jobcache/$jobid/$attemptid/ --- sudo chmod +s taskTracker/jobcache/$jobid/$attemptid --- --- sudo chown user:mapred log-dir/userlogs/$attemptid --- sudo chmod 770 log-dir/userlogs/$attemptid --- sudo chmod +s log-dir/userlogs/$attemptid child umask 0007 > Per-job local data on the TaskTracker node should have right access-control > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4491 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4491 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: security > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Vinod K V > Attachments: HADOOP-4491-20090623-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090623-mapred.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.1.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090703.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707-common.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090707.txt, HADOOP-4491-20090716-mapred.txt > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 10:36:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91308 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 10:36:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 10:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 55092 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 10:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55051 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 10:37:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55041 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 10:37:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:37:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:37:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AEC234C044 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1794771284.1248777434803.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sreekanth Ramakrishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5420) Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sreekanth Ramakrishnan updated HADOOP-5420: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: 5420-ydist.patch.txt Patch to be used for Yahoo distribution > Support killing of process groups in LinuxTaskController binary > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5420 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 5420-fix-ydist.patch, 5420-ydist.patch.txt, hadoop-5420-1.patch, hadoop-5420-10.patch, hadoop-5420-11.patch, hadoop-5420-12.patch, hadoop-5420-2.patch, hadoop-5420-3.patch, hadoop-5420-4.patch, hadoop-5420-5.patch, hadoop-5420-6.patch, hadoop-5420-7.patch, hadoop-5420-8.patch, hadoop-5420-9.patch, HADOOP-5420-v20.patch, hadoop-5420.patch > > > Support setsid based kill in LinuxTaskController. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 11:10:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2049 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 11:10:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 11:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16033 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 11:11:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15994 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 11:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15984 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 11:11:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:11:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E69E234C044 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <247027378.1248779475238.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6123) hdfs script does not work after project split. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736034#action_12736034 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6123: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #37 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/37/]) . Add missing classpaths in hadoop-config.sh. Contributed by Sharad Agarwal > hdfs script does not work after project split. > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: 6123_v1.patch > > > There are problems running hdfs script from common. > # Usage message for hdfs does not have "fs" option anymore. > # There seem to be an undocumented option "dfs", but using it throws NoClassDefFoundError or ClassNotFoundException. > # Same with other options e.g. name-node. > May I am missing something here. How do we call ls these days? > Do we need to move hdfs script to hdfs project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 18:39:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11513 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 18:39:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 18:39:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 68982 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68938 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68918 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 18:40:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:40:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB04234C04B for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1294736091.1248806414894.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6146) Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: <13490839.1247490076513.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736212#action_12736212 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6146: ------------------------------------------------ trunk/.eclipse.templates/.classpath still has {code} {code} It would be great if the .classpath file is generated by a script. I guess it may not be easy to write such script. > Upgrade to JetS3t version 0.7.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6146.patch > > > The JetS3t library is used for the S3 filesystems. We should upgrade to the latest version (0.7.1) which has support for Requester Pays buckets. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 18:53:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15317 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 18:53:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 18:53:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 98289 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 18:54:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98244 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 18:54:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98234 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 18:54:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:54:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:54:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44B234C04B for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2071586940.1248807254905.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:54:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6166) Improve PureJavaCrc32 In-Reply-To: <1460486577.1248313274837.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6166: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c6166_20090728.patch c6166_20090728.patch: included Crc32_16_16 > For the 32 bit results, try passing -server on the command line. ... Here is the result: java.version = 1.6.0_14 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_14-b08 java.vm.version = 14.0-b16 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = x86 os.name = Windows XP os.version = 5.1 ||num bytes||PureJavaCrc32 MB/sec||PureJavaCrc32New MB/sec||Crc32_3_2 MB/sec||Crc32_4_3 MB/sec||Crc32_5_5 MB/sec||Crc32_6_6 MB/sec||Crc32_8_8 MB/sec||Crc32_12_12 MB/sec||Crc32_16_16 MB/sec|| | 8 | 138.935 | 148.510 | 133.888 | 174.420 | 142.309 | 148.559 | 202.270 | 125.889 | 117.607 | | 16 | 195.238 | 179.688 | 194.082 | 196.024 | 202.448 | 174.408 | 231.516 | 181.476 | 249.847 | | 32 | 239.042 | 212.647 | 218.873 | 214.975 | 238.313 | 234.569 | 285.546 | 222.713 | 282.443 | | 64 | 267.240 | 236.977 | 248.711 | 224.998 | 272.373 | 259.976 | 314.990 | 268.683 | 306.000 | | 128 | 282.564 | 261.874 | 258.325 | 195.558 | 183.524 | 290.901 | 339.453 | 307.891 | 285.557 | | 256 | 286.647 | 271.146 | 270.484 | 224.961 | 288.691 | 307.519 | 352.148 | 337.360 | 312.192 | | 512 | 298.539 | 276.192 | 274.773 | 236.895 | 336.279 | 315.217 | 361.232 | 346.809 | 319.615 | | 1024 | 303.658 | 279.882 | 276.542 | 236.183 | 340.919 | 325.135 | 364.909 | 352.689 | 319.080 | | 2048 | 309.358 | 285.787 | 273.328 | 236.416 | 345.868 | 327.777 | 368.106 | 357.019 | 321.033 | | 4096 | 306.306 | 285.192 | 272.680 | 237.541 | 343.045 | 327.025 | 368.837 | 358.270 | 322.088 | | 8192 | 307.772 | 288.171 | 272.977 | 237.316 | 348.833 | 328.908 | 373.525 | 361.827 | 322.454 | | 16384 | 307.900 | 286.654 | 273.482 | 236.011 | 332.936 | 328.303 | 370.397 | 359.706 | 320.460 | | 32768 | 302.599 | 285.929 | 273.000 | 237.496 | 343.129 | 328.161 | 368.144 | 360.141 | 320.854 | | 65536 | 305.564 | 285.796 | 273.027 | 236.645 | 342.567 | 329.054 | 369.318 | 360.611 | 322.333 | | 131072 | 306.763 | 285.466 | 274.336 | 237.648 | 344.286 | 329.910 | 373.027 | 360.100 | 320.236 | | 262144 | 302.322 | 286.444 | 273.267 | 236.971 | 345.512 | 327.882 | 370.549 | 358.936 | 320.964 | | 524288 | 304.555 | 284.659 | 272.150 | 235.174 | 342.026 | 327.074 | 369.213 | 359.436 | 316.547 | | 1048576 | 301.722 | 279.686 | 271.529 | 235.130 | 338.665 | 324.743 | 365.818 | 352.513 | 315.451 | | 2097152 | 301.360 | 282.853 | 270.846 | 232.843 | 336.175 | 322.065 | 362.790 | 356.372 | 317.965 | | 4194304 | 298.921 | 283.021 | 269.376 | 233.498 | 336.376 | 321.957 | 365.402 | 354.546 | 299.699 | | 8388608 | 250.164 | 281.916 | 269.071 | 234.353 | 338.636 | 325.124 | 365.995 | 353.549 | 312.460 | | 16777216 | 290.762 | 264.850 | 270.366 | 235.145 | 338.756 | 321.101 | 364.583 | 353.767 | 316.974 | > Are you specifying a -Xmx memory value? What about -Xms? I have -Xmx512m but no -Xms. Any suggestion? > It is also curious that the PureJavaCrc32New - which only changes the loop style ... This trick does not always work: PureJavaCrc32New was slower in the results shown above. > I think there may be some improvement possible in the 8_8 case in how the 9 XORs at the end are done. ... Yeah, we should try. Thanks, Scott. > Improve PureJavaCrc32 > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c6166_20090722.patch, c6166_20090722_benchmark_32VM.txt, c6166_20090722_benchmark_64VM.txt, c6166_20090727.patch, c6166_20090728.patch > > > Got some ideas to improve CRC32 calculation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 22:02:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42976 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 22:02:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 22:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 56964 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 22:02:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56940 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 22:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56930 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 22:02:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:02:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:02:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05E7234C045 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1566370037.1248818534917.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6170) add Avro-based RPC serialization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org add Avro-based RPC serialization -------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6170 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Doug Cutting Assignee: Doug Cutting Fix For: 0.21.0 Permit RPC protocols to use Avro to serialize requests and responses, so that protocols may better evolve without breaking compatibility. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jul 28 22:13:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49214 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2009 22:13:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2009 22:13:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 69826 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69792 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69725 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2009 22:13:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:13:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:13:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC450234C044 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2017280446.1248819194819.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6170) add Avro-based RPC serialization In-Reply-To: <1566370037.1248818534917.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736331#action_12736331 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6170: -------------------------------------- To implement this, an Avro Transciever can be implemented using Hadoop's Client and Server classes. The request and response Writable would contain just List. > add Avro-based RPC serialization > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > Permit RPC protocols to use Avro to serialize requests and responses, so that protocols may better evolve without breaking compatibility. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 29 10:35:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98447 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 26219 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26199 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26189 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:35:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:35:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25079234C1E6 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616222003.1248863715150.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:35:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5436) job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amar Kamat resolved HADOOP-5436. -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed I think locking the jobtracker cannot be avoided as its inline with heartbeat. MAPREDUCE-786 should make the JobHistory calls faster. > job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Tim Williamson > Attachments: HADOOP-5436.patch > > > An unpleasant surprise upgrading to 0.19: requests to jobtracker.jsp would take a long time or even time out whenever new jobs where submitted. Investigation showed the call to JobInProgress.initTasks() was calling JobHistory.JobInfo.logSubmitted() which in turn was calling JobHistory.getJobHistoryFileName() which was pegging the CPU for a couple minutes. Further investigation showed the were 200,000+ files in the job history folder -- and every submission was creating a FileStatus for them all, then applying a regular expression to just the name. All this just on the off chance the job tracker had been restarted (see HADOOP-3245). To make matters worse, these files cannot be safely deleted while the job tracker is running, as the disappearance of a history file at the wrong time causes a FileNotFoundException. > So to summarize the issues: > - having Hadoop default to storing all the history files in a single directory is a Bad Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission is a Worse Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission while holding a lock on the JobInProgress object and thereby blocking the jobtracker.jsp from rendering is a Terrible Idea (note: haven't confirmed this, but a cursory glance suggests that's what's going on) > - not being able to clean up the mess without taking down the job tracker is just Unfortunate -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jul 29 19:08:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 157 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2009 19:08:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 19:08:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 73383 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2009 19:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73365 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2009 19:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73347 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2009 19:08:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:08:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:08:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5257234C04C for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <490201341.1248894494872.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5436) job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12736758#action_12736758 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-5436: --------------------------------------- I don't see a commit here... how is this issue 'FIXED' ? Is it a duplicate of some other bug? If none of the above, we should mark this jira as 'wontfix'/'invalid' or keep it open if we haven't satisfied the request... > job history directory grows without bound, locks up job tracker on new job submission > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Tim Williamson > Attachments: HADOOP-5436.patch > > > An unpleasant surprise upgrading to 0.19: requests to jobtracker.jsp would take a long time or even time out whenever new jobs where submitted. Investigation showed the call to JobInProgress.initTasks() was calling JobHistory.JobInfo.logSubmitted() which in turn was calling JobHistory.getJobHistoryFileName() which was pegging the CPU for a couple minutes. Further investigation showed the were 200,000+ files in the job history folder -- and every submission was creating a FileStatus for them all, then applying a regular expression to just the name. All this just on the off chance the job tracker had been restarted (see HADOOP-3245). To make matters worse, these files cannot be safely deleted while the job tracker is running, as the disappearance of a history file at the wrong time causes a FileNotFoundException. > So to summarize the issues: > - having Hadoop default to storing all the history files in a single directory is a Bad Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission is a Worse Idea > - doing expensive processing of every history file on every job submission while holding a lock on the JobInProgress object and thereby blocking the jobtracker.jsp from rendering is a Terrible Idea (note: haven't confirmed this, but a cursory glance suggests that's what's going on) > - not being able to clean up the mess without taking down the job tracker is just Unfortunate -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 30 06:56:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56326 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 06:56:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 06:56:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 83270 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 06:56:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83234 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 06:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83224 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2009 06:56:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:56:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:56:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B29234C046 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1937055044.1248936974858.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:56:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nathan Marz (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-5330) Zombie tasks remain after jobs finish/fail/get killed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Marz resolved HADOOP-5330. --------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid As it turns out, this was caused by an application problem. We were running embedded Solr instances in the tasks that were preventing the process from exiting. The fix was to close the Solr instances at task completion. > Zombie tasks remain after jobs finish/fail/get killed > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.19.1 > Reporter: Nathan Marz > > I'm seeing a lot of "task attempts" around our hadoop cluster for jobs that are no longer around. The attempts seem to be "hung", as they sit there forever. Additionally, they seem to take up map and reduce slots in the cluster unless MapReduce is restarted. This causes real jobs to be unable to utilize the whole cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jul 30 23:21:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38339 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 68968 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68924 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68914 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:21:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:21:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5D5234C1E9 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1734084494.1248996074844.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6171 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Todd Lipcon In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 00:11:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45430 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 00:11:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 00:11:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1319 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1276 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1266 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 00:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:11:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81BA234C046 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <474244237.1248999074804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:11:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6169) Removing deprecated method calls in TFile In-Reply-To: <927826654.1248487334841.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737373#action_12737373 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-6169: -------------------------------------- +1. This seems to contain quite a few findbugs warnings also, which is good. > Removing deprecated method calls in TFile > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6169 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6169-20090725.patch > > > We should remove the use of deprecated APIs in TFile. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 02:10:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80296 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 02:10:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 02:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 64934 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:10:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64889 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:10:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64878 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 02:10:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:10:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:10:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAA0234C046 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <848627495.1249006214836.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:10:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6150) Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object In-Reply-To: <1804574098.1247618054845.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6150: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Need to be able to instantiate a comparator instance from a comparator string without creating a TFile.Reader object > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6150 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.20.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6150-0721.patch, HADOOP-6150-0723-for-20.patch > > > Occasionally, we want have the same instance of comparator object represented by the TFile comparator string. We should be able to do that without requiring to first open up a tfile that was previously written use the same comparator. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 02:12:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81401 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 68198 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68136 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68117 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69F2234C1EB for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1788812602.1249006334943.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4162) CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737396#action_12737396 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-4162: ----------------------------------- LZO is not part of hadoop any more... Will mark the issue invalid. > CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Attachments: HADOOP-4162_0_20080911.patch > > > CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. I investigated the code, the reason seems to be the following: > LzopCodec inherits from LzoCodec. The getDecompressorType() method is supposed to return the concrete Decompressor class type the specific Codec class creates. In this case, LzopCodec creates LzopDecompressors and should return LzopDecompressor.class. But instead, it uses the getDecompressorType() method defined in the parent and returns LzoDecompressor.class. > This leads to CodecPool unable to properly recycle the decompressors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 02:12:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81404 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 68216 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68138 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68116 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:12:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41E929A0018 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <257215299.1249006334999.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-4162) CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang resolved HADOOP-4162. ------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid > CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Attachments: HADOOP-4162_0_20080911.patch > > > CodecPool.getDecompressor(LzopCodec) always creates a brand-new decompressor. I investigated the code, the reason seems to be the following: > LzopCodec inherits from LzoCodec. The getDecompressorType() method is supposed to return the concrete Decompressor class type the specific Codec class creates. In this case, LzopCodec creates LzopDecompressors and should return LzopDecompressor.class. But instead, it uses the getDecompressorType() method defined in the parent and returns LzoDecompressor.class. > This leads to CodecPool unable to properly recycle the decompressors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:34:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65562 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:34:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:34:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 89592 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89442 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89422 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:34:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:34:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:34:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0333C234C04C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org bin/hadoop version not working ------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6172 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Hong Tang Priority: Minor Two problems found: - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:40:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66789 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 93996 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93950 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93939 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:40:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2457234C1E6 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2043251489.1249026014860.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sreekanth Ramakrishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737449#action_12737449 ] Sreekanth Ramakrishnan commented on HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------------ HADOOP-4503 actually talks about the first problem which is mentioned in this JIRA. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:40:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66825 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 94065 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94020 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94010 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:40:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:40:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C667D234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <689112236.1249026014805.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737448#action_12737448 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6172: ----------------------------------- Problem symptoms: % bin/hadoop version Hadoop Unknown Subversion Unknown -r Unknown Compiled by Unknown on Unknown >From source with checksum Unknown % build/hadoop-core-0.21.0-dev/bin/hadoop version Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/hadoop/util/VersionInfo Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.hadoop.util.VersionInfo at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:319) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:330) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:254) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:402) > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:42:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67276 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:42:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 96756 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96710 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96698 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:42:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72C8234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1707678108.1249026134811.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:42:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67295 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:42:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 96834 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96787 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96777 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:42:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:42:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:42:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6482234C1E9 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <81545953.1249026134876.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Assignee: Hong Tang Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Trivial patch that fixes both problems. No junit test required. Manually tested and confirmed to resolve the problems. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 07:48:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68376 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6785 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6767 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6757 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:48:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5593234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <206496305.1249026494804.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:48:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737452#action_12737452 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6172: ----------------------------------- @sreekanth, I am not sure if they are the same problem. For HADOOP-4503, call "ant jar" twice would resolve the problem. But for this one, a java file (build/src/org/apache/hadoop/package-info.java) is simply not compiled and deposited to build/classes directory. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 08:04:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72489 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 08:04:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 08:04:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 35019 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:04:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34981 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34971 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 08:04:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:04:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:04:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FCD234C1EB for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6173 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Hong Tang Priority: Minor src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 08:10:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73341 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 08:10:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 08:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 38397 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:10:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38351 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38341 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 08:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:10:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A661234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1084443946.1249027815224.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:10:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737457#action_12737457 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6173: ----------------------------------- The context of the problem is that I want to write a external script to package jars and native libraries from hadoop-gpl-compression to hadoop trunk tarball. The brief procedure is as follows: - build hadoop-gpl-compression, put jar file under $hadoop-src-dir/lib, and native libraries under $hadoop-src-dir/lib/native. - run "ant tar" under $hadoop-src-dir. However, in the tarball, hadoop-gpl-compression-0.1.0-dev.jar is included, but none of the native libraries are included (libgplcompression.*). Close examination reveals that it is because the script src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh has the following lines: Line 45 $TAR *hadoop* | (cd $DIST_LIB_DIR/$platform/; $UNTAR) Line 61 $TAR *hadoop* | (cd $DIST_LIB_DIR/$platform/; $UNTAR) > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 08:12:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73720 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 41108 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41061 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41051 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:12:38 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8555234C1E6 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69638855.1249027937950.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:12:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6173: ------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 08:12:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73748 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 08:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 41176 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41130 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41120 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 08:12:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:12:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:12:39 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24918234C1F1 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <899938108.1249027938148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:12:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang updated HADOOP-6173: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Trivial patch that relaxes the file name restriction. > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 08:20:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75087 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 08:20:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 08:20:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 46546 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46500 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 08:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46490 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 08:20:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C4A234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1700961911.1249028415019.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:20:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hong Tang reassigned HADOOP-6173: --------------------------------- Assignee: Hong Tang > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 17:42:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63147 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 18582 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18542 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18532 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:42:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:42:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8012234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1242812014.1249062134805.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-6173: --------------------------------- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) This seems to me more like a new feature request than a bug: existing code is designed to package what's to be included in a release and no more. You'd like to extend the package task to support inclusion of third party binaries. If we intend to maintain support for such a feature, should we add a test for it? Alternately you might be able to layer your own Ant build file that imports Hadoop's build.xml has a task that depends on the "package" target that then copies extra things into the dist directory, then a task that depends on that task and the "tar" task to bundle everything up. > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 18:16:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81715 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 71295 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71255 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71245 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:16:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:16:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF95A234C1F2 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1793638136.1249064174980.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737631#action_12737631 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 18:18:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89754 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 18:18:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 18:18:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 73528 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:18:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73479 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73469 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 18:18:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:18:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:18:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3717F234C495 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <283776342.1249064295224.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:18:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737633#action_12737633 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------------ Since this is a script changes, test-patch and unit tests are not related. I am going to commit this without submitting it to hudson. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 18:26:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93810 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 18:26:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 18:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 81092 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:26:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81061 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81051 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 18:26:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:26:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:26:36 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1762234C48C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1308284166.1249064774988.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737641#action_12737641 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6172: -------------------------------------------- Shouldn't we have a primitive unit test to check bin/hadoop version result? I believe this is a very basic sanity test too. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 18:34:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98209 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 18:34:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 18:34:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 89402 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:34:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89354 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89344 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 18:34:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:34:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061E2234C04C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <854931886.1249065255002.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737648#action_12737648 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------------ > Shouldn't we have a primitive unit test to check bin/hadoop version result? .. I think this is a good idea but we do not have any unit test to test any script (correct me if I am wrong). Not sure why we are not creating unit tests for scripts. I guess we usually do manual tests for scripts. Are you proposing to add unit tests for scripts? Holding on the commit. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 18:36:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98528 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 18:36:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 18:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 93240 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93212 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 18:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93197 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 18:36:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:36:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:36:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02A4234C1ED for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <818249399.1249065374917.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:36:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737650#action_12737650 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6173: ----------------------------------- Just to clarify, the current build.xml behavior seems to be incorrect/inconsistent with what you described. If I put in a 3rd party jar in lib/, it will be copied to release tar, and if I put a 3rd party native library under lib/native with "hadoop" in their names (like libhadoopgplcompression.so), they will also be included. So I would argue that it is reasonable to include all jars and native libraries under lib/ to tar ball for two reasons: - it is a user's conscience decision to copy data under lib/ and thus the inclusion of these files is "by-choice". - the hadoop script currently includes all jars under lib/ in classpath, and all native libraries under lib/native// in sysproperty java.library.path. And it is reasonable for user to expect that if he/she runs an "ant tar" and untar the tarball somewhere else, it should behave exactly the same as the original place. I am fine to add a test to verify the behavior. How about just running md5sum over the set of files under lib and under package final destination? > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 19:03:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4133 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 19531 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19485 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19475 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:03:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6087234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1590882067.1249066994797.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737660#action_12737660 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6172: ----------------------------------- Such test could change the dependency, because it is testing whether the tar target runs correctly. Or we probably could incorporate it as part of the "test-patch" target (because that would build a tar in the process). > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 19:26:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11433 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 58686 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58640 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58630 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:26:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:26:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FCD234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2022332602.1249068374812.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737675#action_12737675 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6172: -------------------------------------------- I'm not sure why the dependency would be changed - it seems that scripts are coming directly from SVN and nothing special is required to run {noformat} bin/hadoop version {noformat} but compilation. Thus certain script tests won't require anything special too. Am I mistaken? Also, I think whatever tests might be automated with a relatively low effort should be automated. Manual tests aren't that efficient nor error proof. E.g. in the current common trunk bin/hadoop version produces a lot of 'unknown' version tags which might've been caught by a routinely executed test. Shall we start adding tests for scripts right now? Why not - this day isn't worst than any consequent one :-) > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 20:19:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25091 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11002 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10953 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10943 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:19:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:19:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D3D234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <423779046.1249071554807.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737692#action_12737692 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6172: ----------------------------------- @Cos, in this particular case, I want to conduct two tests: - $hadoop-src-dir/bin/hadoop version - $hadoop-src-dir/build/hadoop-xxx/bin/hadoop version The second test requires hadoop being copied to build/bin, which would not happen until "ant tar" is called. So the second test would depend on "tar" target. > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 20:45:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28834 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 20:45:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 20:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 31770 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 20:45:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31726 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 20:45:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31716 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 20:45:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:45:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:45:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26E9234C04C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1201808291.1249073114861.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:45:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737701#action_12737701 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------------ > Also, I think whatever tests might be automated with a relatively low effort should be automated. ... Since our build process does not support script unit tests, I think it is not a relatively low effort to add a test for this issue. The fixes in this issue are simple but important. Even we decide to create unit tests for script, how about do it in a separated issue, so that we can commit this first? > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:12:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35916 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:12:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 55382 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55353 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55326 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:12:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D033A234C04C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <860131482.1249074734852.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6174) Create tests for scripts to verify basic user experience, i.e. version, etc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Create tests for scripts to verify basic user experience, i.e. version, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6174 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik As per HADOOP-6172 we need to have a set of scripts to verify the correctness of some very basic functionality accessible through bin/ scripts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:12:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35990 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 55469 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55424 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55414 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:12:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:12:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBECC234C1F2 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1893808199.1249074734965.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:12:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737711#action_12737711 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6172: -------------------------------------------- Fine with me. Let's commit this first. To track the scripts testing I've created HADOOP-6172 > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:24:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38782 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:24:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:24:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 69091 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:24:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69045 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69035 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:24:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:24:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:24:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5288234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1940824441.1249075454793.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:24:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6174) Create tests for scripts to verify basic user experience, i.e. version, etc. In-Reply-To: <860131482.1249074734852.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737717#action_12737717 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-6174: ------------------------------------- Hopefully TestCLI can be enhanced for these. > Create tests for scripts to verify basic user experience, i.e. version, etc. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > > As per HADOOP-6172 we need to have a set of scripts to verify the correctness of some very basic functionality accessible through bin/ scripts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:40:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47153 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:40:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 81150 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81105 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81095 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:40:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:40:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:40:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61F6234C046 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1539486865.1249076414798.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6172) bin/hadoop version not working In-Reply-To: <816666106.1249025655012.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6172: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Tested manually as shown below: {noformat} bash-3.2$ ./bin/hadoop version Hadoop Unknown Subversion Unknown -r Unknown Compiled by Unknown on Unknown >From source with checksum Unknown # apply patch and recompile bash-3.2$ patch -p0 -i ../hadoop-6172-20090731.patch ... bash-3.2$ ./bin/hadoop version Hadoop 0.21.0-dev Subversion https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/trunk -r 798247 Compiled by tsz on Fri Jul 31 14:40:51 PDT 2009 >From source with checksum 4cec386d7ec492be92e14fc12a5a50a4 {noformat} I have committed this. Thanks, Hong! > bin/hadoop version not working > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6172-20090731.patch > > > Two problems found: > - ${build.src} not included in ant target "compile-core-classes", thus o.a.h.package-info.java is not compiled, which contains the version annotation. > - bin/hadoop-config.sh attempts to include jar files matching pattern hadoop-*-core.jar rather than hadoop-core-*.jar. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:58:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53844 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 92581 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92534 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92524 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:58:35 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBDD234C1EF for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1978873028.1249077494915.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737731#action_12737731 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6173: ----------------------------------- BTW, the attached patch file name is misleading (I mistyped). > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jul 31 21:58:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53882 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2009 21:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 92657 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92604 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92583 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:58:34 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0A5234C04C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1631238047.1249077494892.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6173) src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name In-Reply-To: <210252632.1249027454928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737730#action_12737730 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6173: ----------------------------------- Looks like we need some basic support to test the scripts, particularly because the verification must be done after running "tar" or "package". Similar situation happens for HADOOP-6172. And Cos created a new issue HADOOP-6174 to track the unit tests for scripts. Could we resolve this issue for now? > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6173 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6173 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > Assignee: Hong Tang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6174-20090731.patch > > > src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh only packages files with "hadoop" in the name. This becomes too restrictive when a user wants to inject third-party native libraries into his/her own tar build. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-15651-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 00:25:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8097B4049 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64221 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64101 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64093 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:25:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2DDEC80C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1570148867.57902.1306887887374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7345) listStatus for local files throws NPE instead of permission denied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 listStatus for local files throws NPE instead of permission denied ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7345 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7345 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Calling {{fs.listStatus}} on a local directory where the user does not have permissions generates a {{NullPointerException}}: {noformat} Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1115) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1150) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.listStatus(ChecksumFileSystem.java:494) {noformat} FileSystem.java: {code} 1111: private void listStatus(ArrayList results, Path f, 1112: PathFilter filter) throws FileNotFoundException, IOException { 1113: FileStatus listing[] = listStatus(f); 1114: 1115: for (int i = 0; i < listing.length; i++) { {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15652-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 00:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58841409A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67102 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67063 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:27:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4AEEC891 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1136514016.57917.1306888008042.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041907#comment-13041907 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- LOG.error is always called before handleThrowable. It looked reasonable (it's not swallowing all throwables and log the errors) to me at the time, as we should never let jetty handle the exceptions/errors as stack traces would be display as part of the result, which is a security no no. OTOH, I think the logging should be handled by handleThrowable calls for better readability and DRYness. Looking closely though, I found follow correctness issues: # content type should be set to "application/json; charset=utf8" # need to response.setStatus(response.SC_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) for all error cases > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15653-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 00:41:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C0DE4963 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80926 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80726 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80718 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:41:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:41:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883FECDF3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <328650881.57984.1306888847620.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7121.txt Attached patch adds coverage to all parts of the IPC lifecycle: - client side write param - server side read param - server side write response - client side read response In the cases that the error occurs server side, it sends back the exception to the client as well as logging it. > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15654-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 00:43:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F10449B2 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83828 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83792 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:43:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83784 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:43:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:43:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5561ECEF3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <562956220.57997.1306888967674.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15655-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 00:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD4F140BC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93627 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93494 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93486 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2ABEC241 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1028508876.58011.1306889687369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041919#comment-13041919 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7121: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481021/hadoop-7121.txt against trunk revision 1129905. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/549//console This message is automatically generated. > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15656-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:02:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56C104FB3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2310 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:02:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2260 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:02:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2168 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:02:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:02:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:02:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11508EC3DE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:01:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7346 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15657-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E59064E37 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10659 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10582 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10570 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D17CEC70B for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <454687198.58064.1306890947377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7121.txt Updated patch against trunk > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15658-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:20:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B20174086 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13297 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13243 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13235 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F1EC81E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1585729560.58072.1306891187432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7346.txt I manually tested this patch using an 0.18.3 client, 0.20.0 client, and CDH3 client (which has the same IPC stack as 0.20.20x series) I also looped an old client for a few minutes hitting the new server, then took a jstack on the new server, to make sure there weren't any thread leaks. Unfortunately it's not easy to automatically test it since we can't load old versions of the IPC clients within the context of a unit test. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15659-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:20:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAC114094 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13525 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13496 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13488 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78537EC820 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1966313814.58074.1306891187489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15660-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:26:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E440E4130 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17164 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17085 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17077 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:26:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:26:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830FBEC94D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1667378050.58082.1306891547533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7339: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) 0.23.0 bumping to 0.23 since this is an optimization > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15661-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:29:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 935334193 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21011 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:29:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20981 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20973 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:29:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:29:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:29:33 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557FDECA20 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:28:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <359309548.58088.1306891732346.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041928#comment-13041928 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Hey Owen - is the latest patch acceptable to you? > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15662-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:35:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBC5F47DA for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23679 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23638 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23629 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99319ECB99 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1764487900.58097.1306892087624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041929#comment-13041929 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7346: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481025/hadoop-7346.txt against trunk revision 1129905. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/550//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/550//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/550//console This message is automatically generated. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15663-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:35:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FB7747E9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23925 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23877 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23723 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD072ECB9B for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1227029855.58099.1306892087705.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041930#comment-13041930 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7121: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481024/hadoop-7121.txt against trunk revision 1129905. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/551//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/551//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/551//console This message is automatically generated. > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15664-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E6064EC3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39335 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39292 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39274 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:49:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A34AECF95 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Priyo Mustafi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <209080988.58127.1306892927628.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041933#comment-13041933 ] Priyo Mustafi commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------------- Hi Luke, I need to have Ganglia working with Metrics2. I guess I need to code something like GangliaSink which writes/adapts to say GangliaContext41. Can you please provide me some hints so that I don't spend lot of time going the wrong way? Your help much appreciated. Thanks Priyo > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15665-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 01:53:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74AD54F45 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44537 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44509 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44501 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:53:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1393AEC1E9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:52:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <863808477.58162.1306893168076.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041938#comment-13041938 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7121: ------------------------------------- +1 lgtm Nit: lines 1364, 1366, 1612 don't need to wrap > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15666-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:01:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C67506150 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50731 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50506 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50498 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53D1EC3EE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <660790573.58180.1306893647738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7121.txt nits fixed. Since it was just a whitespace change from previous patch I will commit this version based on Eli's +1. > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15667-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:03:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B40B16AB4 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51779 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51726 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51628 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FCAEC524 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <825097249.58201.1306893767996.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk and 22. Thanks for reviewing, Eli > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15668-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 005B46EC0 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54257 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54180 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54171 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D54AEC5EC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <545810429.58213.1306893887575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041942#comment-13041942 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7121: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481031/hadoop-7121.txt against trunk revision 1129982. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/552//console This message is automatically generated. > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15669-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C7AB6ED2 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54438 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54385 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54178 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D66FEC5EE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1237235509.58215.1306893887641.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041943#comment-13041943 ] XieXianshan commented on HADOOP-7340: ------------------------------------- Thanks for the comments,i`ll update the patch as soon as possible. And meanwhile, i`ll submit another patch to "make it a flag like -addnl". > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15670-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:09:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CDAB6F3B for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58840 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58801 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58786 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01471EC73A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1369625164.58220.1306894128002.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7335.txt Here's a patch to pass that flag to tests. I'd appreciate if someone can test this on Windows/OSX to make sure it doesn't break their platforms. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15671-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:09:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C67746F4A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59005 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58804 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58787 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:09:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:09:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E5EC73C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1412574628.58222.1306894128056.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15672-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 210E5612D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61506 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61422 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61409 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ACAEC8AC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1298467416.58228.1306894487470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041946#comment-13041946 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #631 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/631/]) HADOOP-7121. Exceptions while serializing IPC call responses are not handled well. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129982 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15673-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:25:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEC776547 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70683 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70605 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70597 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:25:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59871ECB2C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1385417673.58247.1306895087363.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041949#comment-13041949 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7335: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481032/hadoop-7335.txt against trunk revision 1129982. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/553//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/553//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/553//console This message is automatically generated. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15674-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 02:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 534EB6CD8 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75448 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75333 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 02:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75311 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 02:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58592ECCB8 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <578625602.58257.1306895447358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041951#comment-13041951 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- Hi Priyo, let's discuss the design of the Ganglia plugin on HADOOP-7324. Since I'm not familiar with Ganglia internals, I have some questions to ask. Can you answer them there? > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15675-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 03:12:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA58269A7 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13601 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:12:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13571 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:12:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13563 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 03:12:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:12:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:12:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA2AEC69A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <51879504.58292.1306897907384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041958#comment-13041958 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------------------- Looks good, except that according to [JAAS reference guide|http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/jaas/JAASRefGuide.html] it suppose to have a single '/' in the file URL. Which doesn't look right to me ;) > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15676-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 03:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66A0D63DE for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26929 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26689 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26669 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 03:30:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C224ECB12 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <822987426.58328.1306898988111.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041963#comment-13041963 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------------------- +1 patch looks good. Do you think it is possible to test this new behavior with perhaps mocks? > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15677-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 03:40:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E95046644 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30833 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30719 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30688 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC03ECED4 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <965088684.58368.1306899587515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041967#comment-13041967 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------------------- Coupla comments Bharath: - this sounds like you are trying to use exceptions to replace return value checks. Now you'd have to check IOException around all the calls to the new API. Besides, you're kinda violating original {{File.list()}} contract which doesn't declare IOException Also, asserts in the tests are better to have messages to ease detection of test failures > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15678-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 03:40:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9108664F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31035 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31005 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30992 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 03:40:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:40:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64781ECED1 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1285409152.58365.1306899587408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041966#comment-13041966 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- My limited knowledge with gmond wire format is from a quick scan of the GangliaContext\*.java source. I have a question that I hope Ganglia experts can answer: the wire format seems _sparse_, in that it contains full key value pairs. I wonder if the update can be sparse as well, i.e., the metrics that haven't changed since the last snapshot doesn't need to be sent to gmond as well. The metrics2 system allows sparse update to reduce object/bandwidth usage. If the update can be sparse, it quite straight forward to adapt FileSink and GangliaContext code. OTOH, If only dense update is allowed, {{o.a.h.metrics2.util.MetricsCache}} can be used. > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, there are a few users who prefer using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15679-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 03:45:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54FB96A1A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33683 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33575 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 03:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33526 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 03:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B15ED110 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1747017124.58392.1306899887544.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041971#comment-13041971 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #632 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/632/]) HADOOP-7284 Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs sradia : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129989 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/InodeTree.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/Constants.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ConfigUtil.java > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash11.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15680-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C94763E5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52958 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52739 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52720 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6233FED6D0 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <686004280.58440.1306901687398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7347) HDFS Wire compatibility MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 HDFS Wire compatibility ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-7347 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7347 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Fix For: 0.23.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15681-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:21:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1E166899 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63513 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:21:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63388 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63366 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:21:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:21:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:21:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FADED895 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <821279707.58447.1306902047549.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <686004280.58440.1306901687398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7347) HDFS Wire compatibility MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7347?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7347: --------------------------------- Attachment: Wire Compatibility =E2=80=93 Separating wire types.pdf The attached document proposes a design to achieve wire compatibility.=20 * The design is complementary to using AVRO/PB like serialization technolog= ies.=20 * Further some of the steps such a separating data types are necessary to u= se such serialization technologies. * The design, can be used to provide compatibility from non-avro/pb (say 23= ) to avro/pb release > HDFS Wire compatibility > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7347 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7347 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Wire Compatibility =E2=80=93 Separating wire types.p= df > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15682-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:23:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7EC46903 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68696 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:23:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68364 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68309 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82176ED939 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7348 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: XieXianshan Assignee: XieXianshan Fix For: 0.23.0 The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15683-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:31:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF14363B3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71173 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71048 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71040 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584CEEDABA for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1133750328.58463.1306902647357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7348.patch > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15684-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A59863F0 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71355 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71309 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71301 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:31:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688C2EDABC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <760772240.58465.1306902647425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) fix this issue. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15685-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 04:45:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7772A643E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76996 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:45:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76738 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 04:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76710 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 04:45:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5508EDD96 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <955557719.58471.1306903487674.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041983#comment-13041983 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7348: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481040/HADOOP-7348.patch against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.cli.TestCLI +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/554//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/554//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/554//console This message is automatically generated. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15686-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 09:46:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14BAB6664 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8530 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 09:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7905 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 09:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7831 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 09:46:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:46:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAD2ED122 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <439313255.59042.1306921547646.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042068#comment-13042068 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #59 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/59/]) HADOOP-7121. Exceptions while serializing IPC call responses are not handled well. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129983 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15687-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 11:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 349246D93 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32120 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32067 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32058 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DD7ED7A6 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1072563231.59247.1306926947815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042112#comment-13042112 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #706 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/706/]) HADOOP-7121. Exceptions while serializing IPC call responses are not handled well. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129982 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15688-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 11:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 438D86DA9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32392 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32354 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32345 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CDAED79D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1273325975.59239.1306926947527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042109#comment-13042109 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7208: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #706 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/706/]) HADOOP-7208. Fix implementation of equals() and hashCode() in StandardSocketFactory. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129840 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestSocketFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/StandardSocketFactory.java > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15689-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 11:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77F926DB9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32630 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32595 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32502 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F33ED7A3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <55634536.59244.1306926947721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042110#comment-13042110 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #706 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/706/]) HADOOP-7284 Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs sradia : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129989 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/InodeTree.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/Constants.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ConfigUtil.java > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash11.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15690-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC4DF6DC9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32889 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32860 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32852 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01ABED7A5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1739056643.59246.1306926947783.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042111#comment-13042111 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7336: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #706 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/706/]) HADOOP-7336. TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. jitendra : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129905 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileContextResolveAfs.java > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15691-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 15:21:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38B6F6950 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18329 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:21:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18279 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18271 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 15:21:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:21:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:21:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF54DEE5FB for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <652717924.59909.1306941647715.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15692-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 15:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDCFC6C20 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24225 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24190 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24182 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 15:23:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE9EEE6E5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <599137111.59916.1306941767578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042227#comment-13042227 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7348: ------------------------------------- I see you beat me to removing my TODO, nice! I'd suggest using a tertiary for assignment, but that's just me, so up to you: {code}delimiter = cf.getOpt("nl") ? "\n" : null;{code} Please update the DESCRIPTION to include the {{-nl}} option, update the text in TestCLI, and update the hdfs tests (link the jira to this one). The applicable tests will be in TestDFSShell and/or TestHDFSCLI. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15693-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 15:25:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC9AD6F4C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33984 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33940 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33878 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE63EE7C9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1490617000.59934.1306941888303.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) The following are the results of test-patch on the security branch. [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 Eclipse classpath. The patch causes the Eclipse classpath to differ from the contents of the lib directories. The eclipse path is bogus, and so is the findbugs. I don't know why they keep complaining but they do. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15694-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 15:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2247C6F5A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34321 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34287 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34279 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 15:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB59EE7B7 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1499847784.59920.1306941887704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch I believe that I have addressed all of the comments. The code no longer catches a Throwable, but enumerates the errors that can occur at each location, and handles them appropriately. IOExceptions are passed up to doGet which will return an INTERNAL SERVER ERROR. If the query is malformed then a BAD REQUEST is returned. In no case is the json being used to return the error. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15695-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 17:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0158629F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47477 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47424 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47415 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 17:33:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:33:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A01EEE652 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1992011655.60357.1306949567427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042309#comment-13042309 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------------------- Hi Konstantin, Thanks for your comments and for reviewing the code. My comments: If you see most of the code in HDFS does have IOException handling around most of the methods. Only the problem is NPE are not handled. We have seen in our tests, NPE can have bad impact on certain cases when disks go bad. IMO, this is the problem with JDK API. Instead of asking user to have these null checks everywhere for these calls, API should have been consistent with the return values. Regarding asserts, I have not put the messages for assertEquals only because this call will assert saying what is expected and actual values should be if it fails. This will be clear from the logs that assertEquals failed. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15696-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 17:35:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56C126788 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49245 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:35:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49160 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49151 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 17:35:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:35:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1886EE6E9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <90700817.60370.1306949687657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042311#comment-13042311 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7144: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481100/HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/555//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/555//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/555//console This message is automatically generated. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15697-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 17:41:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAECE697E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58964 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58912 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58904 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 17:41:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:41:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC1FEE931 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1348718755.60401.1306950047630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042315#comment-13042315 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- +1. It's good enough for commit, even though IMO, it's better to catch and log Throwable and setStatus 500 for security reasons (it's usually recommended to disallow stack traces in responses in production mode, although it's not a big deal in this particular case). BTW, if you submit the trunk patch last and make patch available, hudson/jenkins will pickup the right patch. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15698-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 17:59:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D764361DA for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80053 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80016 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80008 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8A3EE019 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <919435663.60441.1306951127506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042323#comment-13042323 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------------- If no furture comments, would this be committed? > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15699-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 17:59:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84E3961FB for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80348 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80260 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80210 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 17:59:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D92EE021 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1978049135.60447.1306951127676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042324#comment-13042324 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7331: ------------------------------------- Steve, just to check: you're OK with committing this as is, right? > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15700-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 18:20:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E56106512 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24464 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24428 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24420 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 18:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99937EE8ED for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1904727755.60504.1306952387625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042338#comment-13042338 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------------ Cos, the reason I support this new utility api, is that Hadoop is full of constructs like {code} // in context of a "throws IOException" or try/catch IOE: File[] files = dir.list(); if (files.length > 0) {...} {code} This code handles empty and non-empty directory lists, and is ready to handle IOExceptions. Unfortunately, the posix-style File.list() api returns null when it would reasonably be expected to throw IOException, causing NPE on the .length method call, which as a run-time exception isn't typically even looked for. Rather than inject null-checking code with a conditional throw statement into every place like this, Bharath has suggested calling this new FileUtil method. Developers can still use the JDK method when the null return on IOE is desirable. I think this is a good idea. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15701-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 18:22:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D73936532 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25411 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:22:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25352 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:22:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25100 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 18:22:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:22:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:22:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3061DEEAB3 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <334649763.60517.1306952508194.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042340#comment-13042340 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------------ oops, that's String[] not File[]. Same logic for .listFiles() :-) > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15702-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 18:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C759C6FC9 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56288 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:38:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56249 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 18:38:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56241 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 18:38:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:38:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CD2EE14D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1795640380.60595.1306953468471.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042352#comment-13042352 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- Another improvement would be to setStatus 404 if the queryNames result is empty. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15703-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 21:39:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DD656A40 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51936 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:39:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51892 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:39:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51883 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 21:39:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:39:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC329EE854 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1818551636.61033.1306964327702.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042454#comment-13042454 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- Thinking about this more, overloading getCodecByClassName() may be misleading, so it might be better to add a new method called getCodecByName() which returns codecs based on class name or alias. There are only a couple of callers of getCodecByClassName() (in HDFS) so it doesn't make much difference in terms of changing code to use the new method. To take advantage of the new method expressions of the form {code} conf.getClassByName(name).asSubclass(CompressionCodec.class) {code} should be replaced with {code} CompressionCodecFactory.getCodecByName(name) {code} This mainly applies in the MapReduce project. We should also add a getCodecClassByName() method at the same time, since sometimes only the class is needed. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15704-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 21:45:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AAB46EFD for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60505 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:45:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60474 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60466 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 21:45:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:45:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:45:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C80EEAEC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:44:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1134527432.61073.1306964689131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7001) Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042459#comment-13042459 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7001: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #60 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/60/]) Merging changes r1038493 and r1038480 for HADOOP-7001 from trunk suresh : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130306 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/ReconfigurableBase.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Reconfigurable.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/ReconfigurationException.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestSequenceFile.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestReconfiguration.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/ReconfigurationUtil.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/ReconfigurationServlet.java > Allow configuration changes without restarting configured nodes > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7001 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7001 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Patrick Kling > Assignee: Patrick Kling > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7001.2.patch, HADOOP-7001.3.patch, HADOOP-7001.4.patch, HADOOP-7001.5.patch, HADOOP-7001.patch, reconfigurable.patch > > > Currently, changing the configuration on a node (e.g., the name node) requires that we restart the node. We propose a change that would allow us to make configuration changes without restarting. Nodes that support configuration changes at run time should implement the following interface: > interface ChangeableConfigured extends Configured { > void changeConfiguration(Configuration newConf) throws ConfigurationChangeException; > } > The contract of changeConfiguration is as follows: > The node will compare newConf to the existing configuration. For each configuration property that is set to a different value than in the current configuration, the node will either adjust its behaviour to conform to the new configuration or throw a ConfigurationChangeException if this change is not possible at run time. If a configuration property is set in the current configuration but is unset in newConf, the node should use its default value for this property. After a successful invocation of changeConfiguration, the behaviour of the configured node should be indistinguishable from the behaviour of a node that was configured with newConf at creation. > It should be easy to change existing nodes to implement this interface. We can start by throwing the exception for all changes and then gradually start supporting more and more changes at run time. (We might even consider replacing Configured with ChangeableConfigured entirely, but I think the proposal above afford greater flexibility). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15705-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 21:59:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 761BD655E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87683 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:59:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87611 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 21:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87465 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 21:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF7EE27F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1193750186.61135.1306965527880.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1570148867.57902.1306887887374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7345) listStatus for local files throws NPE instead of permission denied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi resolved HADOOP-7345. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate > listStatus for local files throws NPE instead of permission denied > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7345 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7345 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > > Calling {{fs.listStatus}} on a local directory where the user does not have permissions generates a {{NullPointerException}}: > {noformat} > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1115) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1150) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.listStatus(ChecksumFileSystem.java:494) > {noformat} > FileSystem.java: > {code} > 1111: private void listStatus(ArrayList results, Path f, > 1112: PathFilter filter) throws FileNotFoundException, IOException { > 1113: FileStatus listing[] = listStatus(f); > 1114: > 1115: for (int i = 0; i < listing.length; i++) { > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15706-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 22:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92EB86A29 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56623 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56591 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56581 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 22:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EB8EF34A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1967033465.61217.1306968887397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042494#comment-13042494 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------- A generic IOE with a message of "Error accessing", while definitively preferable to a NPE that tears down FsShell, affords the user no idea of the underlying error. At a minimum, it would be nice to distinguish a permission denied from a "something went wrong". I think that would still conform to NIO behavior since the security manager will throw an exception. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15707-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 22:57:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96876A58 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57344 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:57:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57314 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 22:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57306 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 22:57:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:57:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:57:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D4AEF3E6 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <567243826.61224.1306969007544.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042495#comment-13042495 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------- Also, I'm pretty sure acl exceptions were being thrown a few months. Did something maybe change in the NN? > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15708-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 23:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAC2C62DA for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75163 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75122 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75110 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 23:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4623EF8AC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1897325592.61264.1306970087669.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042504#comment-13042504 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7335: ------------------------------------- Yea, I just tried changing my environment to file:/dev/urandom and it doesn't work correctly - I see Jetty hanging at startup. jstack shows it trying to read entropy. If I use file:///dev/urandom as I did in this patch, it starts immediately every time. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15709-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 23:58:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6BE46C05 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28512 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:58:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28478 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28470 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 23:58:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:58:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:58:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF55EE245 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7349 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc, test Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15710-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 23:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A09836C18 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28903 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28876 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28868 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C268EE2D5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1149229970.61344.1306972728309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7349.txt > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15711-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 23:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2D1F6C25 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29143 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29116 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29103 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB1BEE2DC for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <575890928.61349.1306972728454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15712-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 1 23:59:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C0746C34 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29440 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29396 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29388 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BFCEE2D6 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7350 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf, io Reporter: Tom White By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15713-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:05:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E29C656F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38626 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38509 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38501 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:05:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:05:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:05:35 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4156DEE4ED for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:04:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <633786880.61355.1306973094264.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042518#comment-13042518 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7349: ------------------------------------- +1 > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15714-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:07:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EC0F6599 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39498 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39434 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39200 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955D3EE5AC for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <257664967.61363.1306973207608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7350.patch This patch modifies CompressionCodecFactory.getCodecClasses() to use a service loader in addition to reading class names from io.compression.codecs. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15715-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:07:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B98B965DB for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39583 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39516 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39284 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A166EEE5AE for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1806381470.61365.1306973207658.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Assignee: Tom White Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15716-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:11:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16F9466DC for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41966 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:11:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41913 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:11:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41721 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:11:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:11:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93643EE761 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:10:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1645916018.61396.1306973448600.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for JDK File.listFiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7322: ------------------------------- Summary: Adding a util method in FileUtil for JDK File.listFiles (was: Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing) > Adding a util method in FileUtil for JDK File.listFiles > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15717-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A506E6878 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46274 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46246 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46238 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706D5EE8E6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1088725496.61424.1306973687457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042522#comment-13042522 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7349: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481169/hadoop-7349.txt against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/556//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/556//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/556//console This message is automatically generated. > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15718-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:25:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBAC16131 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58523 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58460 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58407 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DEDEED04 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <876506214.61443.1306974287360.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042528#comment-13042528 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481172/HADOOP-7350.patch against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/557//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/557//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/557//console This message is automatically generated. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15719-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 00:53:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFC646D40 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80341 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80262 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80197 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73657EF445 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <43396362.61498.1306975967469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7346.txt I couldn't think of any way to do it with mocks, so I did brute force and wrote some tests which just replay RPC traces that I captured by hand from 0.18.3, branch-0.20, and 0.21.0. They then verify that the response matches my captured response (which I verified generated a reasonable exception on the client) > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15720-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 01:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2136763FE for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93798 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93745 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93729 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8615BEF824 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1551320005.61560.1306976687546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042544#comment-13042544 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7346: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481179/hadoop-7346.txt against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/558//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/558//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/558//console This message is automatically generated. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15721-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 01:25:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E40FB6BCB for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18362 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18333 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18324 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 01:25:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CE2EFDB4 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <512237990.61615.1306977887667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042554#comment-13042554 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------------- - We should probably remove the codecs from core-default.xml now that they're loaded via ServiceLoader - Is there a way to inject a new codec programatically through the ServiceLoader interface? If so, we could entirely deprecate io.compression.codecs. If not, maybe we should rename it to something like io.compression.extra.codecs and specify that it's only necessary if you have a codec that doesn't expose itself through ServiceLoader? - hdfs-default.xml has an item dfs.image.compression.codec that needs to be updated > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15722-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 01:51:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 147436996 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44997 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44929 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 01:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44921 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 01:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:51:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90D4EF41E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <71746544.61661.1306979447688.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042568#comment-13042568 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------ Daryn, at the point of this patch insertion, all we know is that the underlying call (via the abstract API) returned null. How do you propose to distinguish among the possible causes? > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15723-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:06:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E83A46F4 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34772 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:06:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34555 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:06:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34536 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:06:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:06:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:06:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D136EFC66 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7351 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: stack It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: {code} - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); ... {code} HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15724-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:09:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42FA2479C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37292 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37199 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37181 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7B4EFD52 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <452639219.62063.1306994927367.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7351: -------------------------- Assignee: stack Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15725-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:09:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3940247AC for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37479 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37303 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37196 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53223EFD51 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1648811901.62062.1306994927323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7351: -------------------------- Attachment: 7351.txt Patch that does this: {code} - private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { + protected String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { {code} only. > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15726-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:17:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 353314156 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40362 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40228 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:17:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40214 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:17:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8016EFF3F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7352 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs, fs/s3 Reporter: Matt Foley Assignee: Matt Foley In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15727-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:19:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FAA04B56 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43084 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:19:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43013 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42987 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:19:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735A4EFFEF for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <796040710.62077.1306995527456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042622#comment-13042622 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------ This behavior, of returning null on access error, is following the pattern of File::list and File::listFiles, which are defined by the JDK. However, those cause NPE in a lot of Hadoop code too, which is why they've recently been fixed by HADOOP-7342, HADOOP-7322, HDFS-1934, and HDFS-2019. Those patches provided FileUtil alternatives to the JDK methods. That approach isn't applicable to FileSystem::listStatus because it is an abstract method in an important contract class defined by Hadoop. It has a massive number of callers in Common and Mapred (although I found none in HDFS). I believe this change in semantics, to throw IOException instead of returning null, would have no negative impact. I've examined the 36 non-trivial callers in Common, and only 2 checked for null result. All the others would definitely get NPE on null result, and the two that did check had faulty logic! In Mapred there are far more callers, but almost all of them also will throw NPE on null result. In going through about half of them, I found one correct and one incorrect null check in about 20 callers. Therefore, I believe there is no downside to changing the semantics of the base method in this way, and we'll get rid of some mystery NPEs. We will need to scan for any callers that check for null and use it as a non-error condition; there won't be many but there will be a couple. Please give feedback. If this is acceptable I will provide a patch for each of the underlying FileSystem.listStatus implementations, and do the careful scan for callers that actually expect null as an allowed result. > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15728-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 987164E44 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45442 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:25:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45304 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45293 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C09EF197 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1234431402.62080.1306995887396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042623#comment-13042623 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7351: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481198/7351.txt against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/559//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/559//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/559//console This message is automatically generated. > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15729-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 06:29:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24FCB4EC4 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49327 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49280 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 06:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49267 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 06:29:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4AAEF2E2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1772281569.62086.1306996127366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042625#comment-13042625 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------ Correction: there were calls to FileSystem::listStatus in HDFS, but they were all in Test classes, except for two pass-through calls in HftpFileSystem.listStatus() and HftpFileSystem.LsParser.listStatus(). > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15730-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 14:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C54C94451 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1904 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1833 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1819 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 14:16:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8E4F0523 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:15:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1729859746.62851.1307024150714.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042787#comment-13042787 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------- I checked an old path from months ago that I never submitted for FsShell. I see that I was catching AccessControlExceptions to standardized the output format. File access is throwing ACEs but I'm not sure whether dirs were too. It would stand to reason that both file and dir access should throw ACEs, which I think is consistent with NIO behavior? That said, I'm only commenting/lamenting so my intention isn't to block this patch since a NPE will prematurely grind many FsShell commands to a halt. For instance, "du" is worthless if just one dir in the tree is unreadable. In many cases this patch is unquestionably better than nothing. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15731-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 14:31:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5215420D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24001 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23966 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23956 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 14:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEFFF0A87 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1376414453.62883.1307025047635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1430617657.560.1300108409748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7191) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7191: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7191.patch > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7191.patch > > > In our environment, after 3 days long run Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls. > *Thread dump* > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like we are running into similar issue like this Jetty one. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15732-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 14:41:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B26C2456A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51784 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:41:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51737 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:41:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51683 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 14:41:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:41:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F84F0FBC for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <156841823.62922.1307025647852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1430617657.560.1300108409748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7191) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7191: ------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 0.20-append Status: Patch Available (was: Open) As per the patch in DIRMINA-678 > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20-append, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7191.patch > > > In our environment, after 3 days long run Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls. > *Thread dump* > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like we are running into similar issue like this Jetty one. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15733-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 14:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7146444CA for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79299 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79272 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 14:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79264 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 14:55:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E383FF0543 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1504865748.62967.1307026487928.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1430617657.560.1300108409748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7191) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042804#comment-13042804 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7191: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481236/HADOOP-7191.patch against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 2 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/560//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/560//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/560//console This message is automatically generated. > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20-append, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7191.patch > > > In our environment, after 3 days long run Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls. > *Thread dump* > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like we are running into similar issue like this Jetty one. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15734-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 15:04:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12CC64F07 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95352 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95320 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95289 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:04:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:04:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D561F08F3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7353) Display of errors masks details of some exceptions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Display of errors masks details of some exceptions -------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7353 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15735-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 15:10:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C03B342A6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7773 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7719 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7664 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C11F0C16 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <293705748.63018.1307027387527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7354) NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K moved MAPREDUCE-2528 to HADOOP-7354: ---------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: jobtracker) Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Key: HADOOP-7354 (was: MAPREDUCE-2528) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop Map/Reduce) > NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7354 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2528-1.patch, MAPREDUCE-2528.patch > > > If we click on Kill Selected Jobs or Change button without selecting any job, it is giving the below exception in the UI. > {code} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter$RequestQuoter.getParameterValues(HttpServer.java:798) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JSPUtil.processButtons(JSPUtil.java:209) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobtracker_jsp._jspService(jobtracker_jsp.java:146) > at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:871) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) > at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:879) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:741) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:213) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15736-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 15:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD74744A8 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13543 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13515 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13507 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7752EF0CF6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1682913859.63047.1307027507485.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7354) NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042816#comment-13042816 ] Devaraj K commented on HADOOP-7354: ----------------------------------- Issue is moved to Hadoop Common because changes need to be done in common for this issue. Provided patch with server side fix. > NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7354 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2528-1.patch, MAPREDUCE-2528.patch > > > If we click on Kill Selected Jobs or Change button without selecting any job, it is giving the below exception in the UI. > {code} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter$RequestQuoter.getParameterValues(HttpServer.java:798) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JSPUtil.processButtons(JSPUtil.java:209) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobtracker_jsp._jspService(jobtracker_jsp.java:146) > at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:871) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) > at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:879) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:741) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:213) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15737-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 15:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05D5E44B1 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13795 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13718 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13577 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90433F0CF9 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1409139511.63050.1307027507587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7354) NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K updated HADOOP-7354: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7354 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2528-1.patch, MAPREDUCE-2528.patch > > > If we click on Kill Selected Jobs or Change button without selecting any job, it is giving the below exception in the UI. > {code} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter$RequestQuoter.getParameterValues(HttpServer.java:798) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JSPUtil.processButtons(JSPUtil.java:209) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobtracker_jsp._jspService(jobtracker_jsp.java:146) > at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:871) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) > at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:879) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:741) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:213) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15738-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 15:35:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B29B64B8C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65687 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:35:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65654 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 15:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65646 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 15:35:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:35:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C71AF06E3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <917112299.63105.1307028887571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7354) NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042829#comment-13042829 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7354: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481233/MAPREDUCE-2528-1.patch against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/561//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/561//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/561//console This message is automatically generated. > NullPointerException in the job tracker UI, when we perform kill or change the priority of jobs without selecting the any job. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7354 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7354 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: MAPREDUCE-2528-1.patch, MAPREDUCE-2528.patch > > > If we click on Kill Selected Jobs or Change button without selecting any job, it is giving the below exception in the UI. > {code} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter$RequestQuoter.getParameterValues(HttpServer.java:798) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JSPUtil.processButtons(JSPUtil.java:209) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.jobtracker_jsp._jspService(jobtracker_jsp.java:146) > at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:97) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:502) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1124) > at org.apache.hadoop.http.HttpServer$QuotingInputFilter.doFilter(HttpServer.java:871) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1115) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:361) > at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216) > at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:766) > at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:417) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:230) > at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152) > at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:324) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:534) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(HttpConnection.java:879) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:741) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:213) > at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:403) > at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:409) > at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:522) > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15739-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 16:46:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F013E406B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14943 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 16:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14893 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 16:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14885 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 16:46:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:46:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97239F01D3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <135051868.63252.1307033147615.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042867#comment-13042867 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7351: ------------------------------------- We should figure out what the intended interface audience and classification is for HttpServer... I'm thinking: @InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate({"HDFS", "MapReduce", "HBase"}) @InterfaceStability.Evolving does that sound right? > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15740-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:07:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0EF64C1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63543 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:07:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63516 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63508 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:07:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:07:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673F4F0A79 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1382063703.63329.1307034407419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042884#comment-13042884 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------ In a comment in another bug (here), Daryn points out that if the exceptions are thrown from a lower level with knowledge of the cause of the problem, it would be good to throw something informative such as AccessControlException, rather than just a generic IOException. I agree in principle, but AccessControlException is a subclass of SecurityException, which is a RuntimeException and therefore no better than NPE. All of the callers of listStatus() are prepared to get an IOException, but none of the standard sub-classes of IOException include access failures. Is there a Hadoop or Apache defined sub-class of IOException that would be appropriate? > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15741-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:09:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2224C74 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66360 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66322 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66314 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAD1F0B4D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <48310626.63336.1307034527433.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042886#comment-13042886 ] stack commented on HADOOP-7351: ------------------------------- Sounds fine to me. Want me to add this to patch? > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15742-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:09:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 097144C7B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66619 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66558 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66382 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C739F0B50 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1906647090.63338.1307034527506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042887#comment-13042887 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------ @Daryn, for discussion of what exception to throw in the more complete solution, please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?focusedCommentId=13042884&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13042884 > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15743-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:11:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE1F74D90 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70408 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70355 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:11:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70347 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:11:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:11:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61106F0C69 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912493675.63344.1307034647394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042889#comment-13042889 ] stack commented on HADOOP-7351: ------------------------------- Though, Todd, your suggestions are a little out of scope for this JIRA? Should I do annotations in new issue? > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15744-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA24548D0 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8031 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8001 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7993 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F196F0A0B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <347375324.63409.1307035907648.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042900#comment-13042900 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7351: ------------------------------------- Yea, other issue is fine. +1 for this issue, but let's try to get the annotations in 0.22 as well. Maintaining APIs that allow subclassing by other projects is tough. > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15745-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 17:50:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F66444AF for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44636 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:50:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44596 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 17:50:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44588 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 17:50:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:50:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:50:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3338EF09B2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:49:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <790882.63604.1307036988206.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042932#comment-13042932 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------- Hadoop common has a {{org.apache.hadoop.fs.permission.AccessControlException}} derives from {{IOException}}. > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15746-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:16:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F071D4977 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 189 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 133 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99862 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FC3F08E2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7355 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: stack Assignee: stack HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15747-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41EFD4062 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13104 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13066 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13054 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774AFF0C66 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1159492490.63746.1307039027485.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Attachment: 7355.txt > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15748-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42C5E4068 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13179 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13077 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13057 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7F0F0C65 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1212636360.63745.1307039027441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042959#comment-13042959 ] stack commented on HADOOP-7351: ------------------------------- Added HADOOP-7355 to add annotations. > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15749-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B01BB4088 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13549 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13487 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13245 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B33BF0C6C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1079644619.63750.1307039027632.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15750-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E419457E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20169 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20134 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20119 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9BAF0ECA for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <766793301.63769.1307039267712.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Attachment: 7355-v2.txt > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15751-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:28:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83404458B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20230 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20137 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20120 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5C1F0EC6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <729315901.63766.1307039267514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Missed import > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15752-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:30:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C00DC4968 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23748 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:30:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23719 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23710 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B08BF0F95 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2020346558.63772.1307039387369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Added missing import. Resubmit. > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15753-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:41:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D1624525 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45413 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45372 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45363 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:41:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBD3F03A5 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <322002804.63786.1307040047437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042971#comment-13042971 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7355: ----------------------------------- +1 > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15754-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 18:45:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B9104A43 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55197 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55137 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 18:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55129 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 18:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C86F05B2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2040142587.63803.1307040287614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042975#comment-13042975 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7355: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481272/7355-v2.txt against trunk revision 1129989. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/562//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/562//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/562//console This message is automatically generated. > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15755-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD80B43FA for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10407 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10371 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10362 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1A4F01C6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <362341760.63859.1307041907509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7351: -------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 0.22 branch and to TRUNK. Thanks for review Todd. This small change makes it so HBase does not have to redo how it does its UI when it runs against hadoop 0.22; we subclass HttpServer so we can have the 'log level', 'thread dump', etc., servlets available in HBase UI. > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15756-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:12:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 036504414 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10717 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10680 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10672 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:12:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:12:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:12:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF4CF01C9 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <664679266.63862.1307041907631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HADOOP-7355: -------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to branch and trunk. Thanks for the review Tom. > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15758-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48A884480 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13905 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13872 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13830 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6121F03A6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1121771945.63881.1307042028677.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042998#comment-13042998 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7351: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #633 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/633/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130730 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15757-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:14:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49EFE4485 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13742 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13701 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13664 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4FDF03A4 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <477573083.63879.1307042028567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042997#comment-13042997 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7355: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #633 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/633/]) HADOOP-7355 Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130729 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15759-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:14:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B5AF44E3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15056 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15023 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15015 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:14:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:14:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78167F03A2 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1350904890.63877.1307042028488.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6461) webapps aren't located correctly post-split MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042996#comment-13042996 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6461: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #633 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/633/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130730 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > webapps aren't located correctly post-split > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt > > > Post-split, when one builds common it creates an empty build/webapps dir. If you then try to launch the NN for example using HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=/path/to/hdfs hdfs namenode, HttpServer.getWebAppsPath locates the empty common webapps dir, and the NN web UI fails to load. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15760-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4A3C4E8C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26937 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26907 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26897 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602BAF0662 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1519302869.63899.1307042627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 22 and trunk, thanks Eli > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15761-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:28:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 562234F31 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30736 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30685 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30677 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9860F0826 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <902840117.63910.1307042867756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043005#comment-13043005 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7351: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #634 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/634/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 -- Fix commit message; I'd put it in wrong location under 'new features' rather than under 'bugs' stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130738 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15762-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 528754F48 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31211 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31181 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31173 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A919EF0824 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <276558850.63908.1307042867689.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6461) webapps aren't located correctly post-split MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043004#comment-13043004 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6461: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #634 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/634/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 -- Fix commit message; I'd put it in wrong location under 'new features' rather than under 'bugs' stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130738 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > webapps aren't located correctly post-split > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt > > > Post-split, when one builds common it creates an empty build/webapps dir. If you then try to launch the NN for example using HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=/path/to/hdfs hdfs namenode, HttpServer.getWebAppsPath locates the empty common webapps dir, and the NN web UI fails to load. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15763-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:46:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B250F489D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63394 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63321 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63313 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7075BF0F1C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <694023600.63942.1307043947457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043012#comment-13043012 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #635 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/635/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130758 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15764-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:46:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A67348F6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63649 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63608 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63596 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE4BF0F22 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1945182169.63948.1307043947762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043013#comment-13043013 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #635 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/635/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130758 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15765-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 19:46:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 741684904 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63883 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63816 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63650 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 19:46:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FBF0F27 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <98325961.63950.1307043947829.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043014#comment-13043014 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------- It's correct to make the contract consistent. Trying to make IOExceptions useful at this point is probably a lost cause. Otherwise, the changes proposed sound reasonable. > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15766-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 20:08:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E17B5440B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97787 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:08:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97744 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:08:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97736 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 20:08:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:08:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gokrazzzy@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:08:33 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QSEBg-0005MD-IE for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:08:12 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT) From: gokul To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1307045292541-3016972.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Hadoop QuickStart Standalone Operation error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear all, I have been trying to get a hang of Hadoop (noob/ newbie). After installation, I followed the Quick Start guide of Hadoop to execute the sample example given ( http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/quickstart.html#Local Standalone Operation ). After executing the third step ( $ bin/hadoop jar hadoop-*-examples.jar grep input output 'dfs[a-z.]+' ), I got the error saying that "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Internship/hadoop-0/20/2/bin////logs Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Internship.hadoop-0.20.2.bin....logs at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: Internship/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs. Program will exit." I tried a lot of different things and nothing worked. Some of the solutions that didn't help: 1) Set the $JAVA_HOME path correctly (works fine) 2) Command incorrect: $ bin/hadoop jar hadoop-*-examples.jar grep input output 'dfs[a-z.]+' (correct as per Hadoop QuickStart) Any form of help is very very gratefully appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://hadoop-common.472056.n3.nabble.com/Hadoop-QuickStart-Standalone-Operation-error-tp3016972p3016972.html Sent from the Issues mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From common-issues-return-15767-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 20:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 336394462 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31570 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31541 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31530 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 20:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF75F18D5 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <601228460.64008.1307046227643.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043029#comment-13043029 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------- bq. MR-279 out of (yahoo-merge,MR-279,yahoo-merge). +1, thanks Todd! > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15768-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 20:50:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1026C4E6C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81617 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81590 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 20:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81582 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 20:50:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:50:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90074F0001 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1138665100.64049.1307047787586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043037#comment-13043037 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7352: -------------------------------------------- Throwing an IOException is reasonable when listStatus returns null. The reason for this null case can be multiple things like file may not be present, permission issue, disk is bad, OS decided to make file system readonly etc etc. Since at FileSystem level we may not know all the causes for this so we should throw an IOException. Do you agree? > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15769-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400864BD5 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27483 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27426 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97988 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 20:08:40 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of subscription-bounces+404756@n3.nabble.com designates 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "gokul [via Hadoop Common]" To: common-issues Message-ID: <1307045292541-3016972.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Hadoop QuickStart Standalone Operation error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_23956_3812415.1307045292543" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_23956_3812415.1307045292543 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, I have been trying to get a hang of Hadoop (noob/ newbie). After installation, I followed the Quick Start guide of Hadoop to execute the sample example given ( http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/quickstart.html#Local Standalone Operation ). After executing the third step ( $ bin/hadoop jar hadoop-*-examples.jar grep input output 'dfs[a-z.]+' ), I got the error saying that "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Internship/hadoop-0/20/2/bin////logs Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Internship.hadoop-0.20.2.bin....logs at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) Could not find the main class: Internship/hadoop-0.20.2/bin/../logs. Program will exit." I tried a lot of different things and nothing worked. Some of the solutions that didn't help: 1) Set the $JAVA_HOME path correctly (works fine) 2) Command incorrect: $ bin/hadoop jar hadoop-*-examples.jar grep input output 'dfs[a-z.]+' (correct as per Hadoop QuickStart) Any form of help is very very gratefully appreciated. Thanks in advance. ______________________________________ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://hadoop-common.472056.n3.nabble.com/Hadoop-QuickStart-Standalone-Operation-error-tp3016972p3016972.html This email was sent by gokul (via Nabble) To receive all replies by email, subscribe to this discussion: http://hadoop-common.472056.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=subscribe_by_code&node=3016972&code=Y29tbW9uLWlzc3Vlc0BoYWRvb3AuYXBhY2hlLm9yZ3wzMDE2OTcyfDQyNDMxNTUzOQ== ------=_Part_23956_3812415.1307045292543-- From common-issues-return-15770-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:20:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F05A843F3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35224 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:20:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35190 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:20:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35096 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:20:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:20:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DB8F0C31 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <701793763.64135.1307049587659.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7350.patch {quote} - We should probably remove the codecs from core-default.xml now that they're loaded via ServiceLoader {quote} Done - see new patch. {quote} - Is there a way to inject a new codec programatically through the ServiceLoader interface? If so, we could entirely deprecate io.compression.codecs. If not, maybe we should rename it to something like io.compression.extra.codecs and specify that it's only necessary if you have a codec that doesn't expose itself through ServiceLoader? {quote} I don't think we need to deprecate or rename io.compression.codecs - it's just used to specify _additional_ codecs to the ones that are loaded through a ServiceLoader. Note that duplicates are ignored, so there's no problem with users older configs having codecs that could be loaded through ServiceLoader. {quote} - hdfs-default.xml has an item dfs.image.compression.codec that needs to be updated {quote} This doesn't need to be updated, although with HADOOP-7323 (and a corresponding HDFS change) it could be changed to "default". > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15771-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F348B4FBF for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52658 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52612 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52604 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C805F10A7 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1619379070.64157.1307050427440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043063#comment-13043063 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481287/HADOOP-7350.patch against trunk revision 1130758. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/563//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/563//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/563//console This message is automatically generated. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15772-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:38:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B27C44097 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56603 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56578 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56570 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3CFF11F1 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <287817546.64167.1307050667448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043066#comment-13043066 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------------- bq. This doesn't need to be updated Sorry, the default doesn't need to change, but the docs should be updated: it no longer needs to be one of the codecs listed in io.compression.codecs. It just needs to be any codec that's "registered" (either via conf or via ServiceLoader). I don't know the best verbiage to succinctly document it, though. The rest of your points make sense. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15773-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:42:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE9DF4475 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67071 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67020 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66983 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:42:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:42:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:42:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702CFF1313 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <975262325.64173.1307050907456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043067#comment-13043067 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------------- +1 on most recent patch > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15774-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E26A479B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73567 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73531 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73523 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52A2F149C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <145690903.64181.1307051027870.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6461) webapps aren't located correctly post-split MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043069#comment-13043069 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6461: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #61 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/61/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130740 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > webapps aren't located correctly post-split > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt > > > Post-split, when one builds common it creates an empty build/webapps dir. If you then try to launch the NN for example using HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=/path/to/hdfs hdfs namenode, HttpServer.getWebAppsPath locates the empty common webapps dir, and the NN web UI fails to load. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15775-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6498A47A3 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73839 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73773 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73561 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E69F149E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <286046074.64183.1307051027926.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043070#comment-13043070 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #61 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/61/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130757 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15776-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C8E147B1 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73943 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73889 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73753 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26851F14A6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1655689487.64190.1307051028154.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043071#comment-13043071 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7355: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #61 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/61/]) HADOOP-7355 Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130741 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15777-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECA2947C8 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74402 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74345 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74328 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508C7F14AA for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1367556399.64194.1307051028326.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043072#comment-13043072 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7351: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #61 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/61/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130740 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15778-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12FDE47DE for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74662 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74626 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74618 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F908F1496 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2135754297.64175.1307051027650.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043068#comment-13043068 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #61 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/61/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130757 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15779-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:44:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3146B4893 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76369 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76336 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76328 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:44:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967F3F14B1 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2024260301.64201.1307051028613.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: hadoop-daemon.sh now returns a non-zero exit code if it detects that the daemon was not still running after 3 seconds. Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed this to trunk. Thanks, Tanping! I marked this as an incompatible change and added a release note just in case anyone was relying on the previously broken behavior. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15780-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFEEE44BE for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79149 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79110 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79102 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:46:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62050F1633 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:45:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <670428312.64210.1307051148398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043076#comment-13043076 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7331: ------------------------------------- (should have mentioned, I realized Steve is on vacation at the moment. Since Tanping had addressed his comment, I decided to commit - if there's any issue we can revert or follow up later with another patch) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15781-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 760404FB9 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85683 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85629 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85621 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:48:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:48:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12645F178D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:47:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1047433099.64245.1307051268072.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7323.patch Tom, Thank for your feedback. Attached is patch that includes your suggestions. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15782-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 21:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B36641CE for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95467 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95386 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95378 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:58:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6084DF1A0A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <400248794.64253.1307051867391.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043083#comment-13043083 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481292/HADOOP-7323.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/564//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/564//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/564//console This message is automatically generated. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15783-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 22:06:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBD1E49E9 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6074 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6041 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 22:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6033 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 22:06:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:06:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:06:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94692F15A5 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <820581336.64285.1307052347603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043087#comment-13043087 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #636 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/636/]) HADOOP-7331. Make hadoop-daemon.sh return exit code 1 if daemon processes did not get started. Contributed by Tanping Wang. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130833 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15784-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 380694985 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89969 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89942 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89933 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3C1F1B90 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <134648733.64561.1307056547968.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15785-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C327749C0 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90227 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90201 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90193 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB0CF1B92 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1106168305.64563.1307056548040.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7323.patch And now a patch with all files :) > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15786-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:28:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DF7F4F59 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5981 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:28:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5811 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5617 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:28:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:28:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C6F1E53 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7356 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15787-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B914BFA for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7705 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:32:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7668 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7660 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C4EF1F20 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1880834417.64593.1307057507355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7350.patch Slight adjustment to load codec classes only once using a ServiceLoader. I'll address the HDFS documentation change in another JIRA. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15788-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:50:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C35874D44 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21016 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20988 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20980 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71862F1453 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1918384273.64620.1307058587461.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7356.patch Preserve hadoop-config.sh and HADOOP_HOME locations for developers. This only applies to 0.20.204 or 0.20.205 branches. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15789-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12ECB4D5A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21180 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21129 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21081 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90798F1456 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1490460127.64623.1307058587586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15790-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:54:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDC6A4D8C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22465 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22434 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22426 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C35F156C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1934380502.64629.1307058827467.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043143#comment-13043143 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481304/HADOOP-7350.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/565//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/565//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/565//console This message is automatically generated. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15791-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 2 23:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9E304DA6 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22757 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22716 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22708 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 23:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65917F156A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <634015767.64627.1307058827412.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043142#comment-13043142 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7356: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481305/HADOOP-7356.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/566//console This message is automatically generated. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15792-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 01:07:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE23E4C0A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84890 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 01:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84866 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 01:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84858 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 01:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A26F1536 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1207205763.64768.1307063207478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <958686885.62073.1306995407750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7352) Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043163#comment-13043163 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7352: ------------------------------------ @Daryn - thanks, I'll use that where appropriate. @Bharath - agreed, the exception will always be IOException or one of its subclasses; IOException where there is no detailed info available or no better subclass defined. > Contracts of LocalFileSystem and DistributedFileSystem should require FileSystem::listStatus throw IOException not return null upon access error > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7352 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > In HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538 it was agreed that FileSystem::listStatus should throw FileNotFoundException instead of returning null, when the target directory did not exist. > However, in LocalFileSystem implementation today, FileSystem::listStatus still may return null, when the target directory exists but does not grant read permission. This causes NPE in many callers, for all the reasons cited in HADOOP-6201 and HDFS-538. See HADOOP-7327 and its linked issues for examples. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15793-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 01:13:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F28704E15 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91784 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91757 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91749 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:13:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E647F16BB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1359596915.64782.1307063567579.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043166#comment-13043166 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7341: ------------------------------------- Are there any remaining issues I need to address? > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15794-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 06:01:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3FCF61A5 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23421 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23398 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23385 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:01:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:01:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63485F1632 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:00:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <72681940.65118.1307080849403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043222#comment-13043222 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------------------- Matt, according to [Jacob's comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1934?focusedCommentId=13039888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13039888] this API chance has been already discussed and I have missed that part. So, taking it back: let's go with this (although it seems unusual ;) > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15795-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 06:01:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DFC461C4 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23698 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23662 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23653 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 06:01:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:01:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:01:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3BDF1643 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:00:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <919591549.65131.1307080849902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043223#comment-13043223 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------------------- bq. This will be clear from the logs that assertEquals failed. Bharath, it will be apparent that it failed, but won't clear why without looking into the test's code. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15796-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 06:05:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF7956F64 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27178 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:05:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27075 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 06:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27029 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 06:05:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE8F1743 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 06:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1471056846.65135.1307081087364.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043224#comment-13043224 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------------------- Creative ;) Thanks. There's a couple of white-space changes in the latest patch. +1 otherwise. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15797-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 08:22:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3568162DF for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69294 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:22:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69266 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:22:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69258 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 08:22:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:22:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D426F2DB9 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <702637021.65228.1307089307575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043247#comment-13043247 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------ We have two instances of this bug actually causing NPEs in the real world (or at least the Test world). The first is in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier(), which runs on the LocalFileSystem, and launches a Trash$Emptier thread in background. Every time that thread cycles, it attempts to empty the local .Trash directory in EVERY "home directory" known. On my Mac, there are four user accounts, each with its own "home" directory, one of which, /Users/test, has a .Trash directory with access permissions set so it is not readable by me. When it tries to list the .Trash subdirectories with FileSystem.listStatus(), it logs the following: 11/05/23 14:34:54 WARN fs.Trash: RuntimeException during Trash.Emptier.run() java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1114) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1137) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.listStatus(ChecksumFileSystem.java:494) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash.expunge(Trash.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.Trash$Emptier.run(Trash.java:313) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) The second example is from Daryn, and was partly described in HADOOP-7345. When he tries to use "bin/hadoop fs -ls aaa" on any directory "aaa" for which he does not have access privs, it logs: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1115) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.listStatus(FileSystem.java:1150) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem.listStatus(ChecksumFileSystem.java:494) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell.PathData.getDirectoryContents(PathData.java:163) It is seen that both of these cases go through the FileSystem.listStatus(ArrayList, Path, PathFilter) form of the call, and it is here that the attached patch is targeted. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15798-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 08:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E8C6910 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82631 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82602 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82593 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:34:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A654BF212E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1166556808.65239.1307090027677.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043250#comment-13043250 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------ Although this issue was discovered while investigating HDFS-1852, it does not actually block it, so removing the "blocker" link. It doesn't cause TestTrash to fail, it just junks up the log with NPEs while running TestTrash on a local system. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15799-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 08:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37BA06943 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82883 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82858 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82850 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 08:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B942DF2130 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <574821798.65241.1307090027755.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15800-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31B70621A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19814 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19794 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19786 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C32F243C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <655346790.65454.1307099747659.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043299#comment-13043299 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7331. Make hadoop-daemon.sh return exit code 1 if daemon processes did not get started. Contributed by Tanping Wang. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130833 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15802-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8109624A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20335 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20293 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20280 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C652F244D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <999649012.65471.1307099748309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620892300.63733.1307038547598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7355) Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043303#comment-13043303 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7355: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7355 Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130729 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > Add audience and stability annotations to HttpServer class > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7355 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7355-v2.txt, 7355.txt > > > HttpServer has at least one subclasser in HBase. Flag this class w/ annotations that make this plain so we avoid regressions like HADOOP-7351 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15803-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A93C627B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20838 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20797 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20789 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2471F2440 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1479850343.65458.1307099747792.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6461) webapps aren't located correctly post-split MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043301#comment-13043301 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6461: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 -- Fix commit message; I'd put it in wrong location under 'new features' rather than under 'bugs' HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130738 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130730 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > webapps aren't located correctly post-split > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt > > > Post-split, when one builds common it creates an empty build/webapps dir. If you then try to launch the NN for example using HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=/path/to/hdfs hdfs namenode, HttpServer.getWebAppsPath locates the empty common webapps dir, and the NN web UI fails to load. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15804-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3D956289 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21068 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21040 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21028 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0E5F244B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1964047960.65469.1307099748255.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043302#comment-13043302 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7121: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130758 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt, hadoop-7121.txt > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15801-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62920622D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19982 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19933 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19884 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A48F243E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <479584761.65456.1307099747740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1016265931.61342.1306972667438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7349) HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043300#comment-13043300 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7349: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7349. HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests in TestIPC. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130758 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > HADOOP-7121 accidentally disabled some tests > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7349.txt > > > When I converted TestIPC to JUnit 4, I missed a couple of tests towards the bottom of the file when adding the @Test annotation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15805-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 11:16:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F03263DC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21524 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21496 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21488 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 11:16:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67421F244F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2057249495.65473.1307099748419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <99930859.62060.1306994747296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7351) Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043304#comment-13043304 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7351: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #708 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/708/]) HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 -- Fix commit message; I'd put it in wrong location under 'new features' rather than under 'bugs' HADOOP-7351 Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130738 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt stack : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1130730 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > Regression: HttpServer#getWebAppsPath used to be protected so subclasses could supply alternate webapps path but it was made private by HADOOP-6461 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7351 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Assignee: stack > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 7351.txt > > > It USED to be protected rather than private but its access was changed by HADOOP-6461. It did the following: > {code} > - protected String getWebAppsPath() throws IOException { > - URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps"); > + private String getWebAppsPath(String appName) throws FileNotFoundException { > + URL url = getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("webapps/" + appName); > ... > {code} > HBase subclasses HttpServer providing its UI. This change makes it so we can no longer do so. > This change made it into 0.21. I'd like to get a fix committed to 0.22 as well as TRUNK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15806-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 15:48:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 263DF61D3 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95265 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95234 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95223 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 15:48:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:48:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:48:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD82F24FD for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1301941069.66008.1307116067770.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043417#comment-13043417 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------- +1 It looks like the issue will be more comprehensively addressed by HADOOP-7352, so I'm fine with this as an incremental improvement. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15807-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 15:52:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6C816413 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8400 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8367 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8358 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62905F2719 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <835823012.66027.1307116307400.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7343: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15808-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 15:52:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE7D36420 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8647 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8608 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8600 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B51EF2723 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1335334742.66033.1307116307632.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7343: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15809-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 15:56:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CB4D6658 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15417 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15380 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15370 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F48F2940 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1716844908.66048.1307116547864.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7343: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15810-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 15:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E56A667D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15870 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15827 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15819 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 15:56:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C5DF293E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <340506013.66046.1307116547802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043423#comment-13043423 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7343: --------------------------------------- tested manually by having it not quit if svn update finds code checked out since otherwise it would fail and run the old test-patch.sh. [exec] [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15811-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:04:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08C1F6FF5 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30419 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30382 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30374 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:04:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:04:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E92DF2C8B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <740833217.66076.1307117027384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043429#comment-13043429 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7343: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481360/HADOOP-7343-20security.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/567//console This message is automatically generated. > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15812-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF0116F3E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79114 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79080 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79072 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E3DF2518 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <185570340.66155.1307118107655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7342-2.patch Added the Assert messages Cos requested, and trigger patch submission. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15813-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:22:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2B966F66 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79955 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79906 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79845 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:22:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:22:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:22:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EF1F2521 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2130042012.66162.1307118107927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15814-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC4FB601A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43764 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43735 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43725 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770FBF20BA for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1954060242.66263.1307119487484.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043564#comment-13043564 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7342: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481365/HADOOP-7342-2.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/568//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/568//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/568//console This message is automatically generated. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15815-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:47:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4E856DE8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48253 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48220 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48212 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:47:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E9AF2AB7 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1868245221.66273.1307119607540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043613#comment-13043613 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------------ Looks good. Cos, can you +1 it? > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15816-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 16:57:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1A90668A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60231 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60195 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60187 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 16:57:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:57:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:57:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F0FF233E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:56:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <810589611.66302.1307120208225.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Summary: Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces (was: Display of errors masks details of some exceptions) > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15817-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 17:18:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 367AE6096 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98248 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98212 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98204 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C6CF2BE6 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <590931434.66382.1307121467946.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15818-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 17:18:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1742D60CC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98525 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98486 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98478 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 17:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94905F2BD7 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <681738408.66373.1307121467605.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7353.patch Cleanup exception handling in {{FsShell.run()}} method to print the stack trace of unexpected exceptions such as NPEs. Converted -help & -usage into {{FsCommand}} subclasses to greatly simplify the aforementioned exception handling block. All conditional chains are now gone! Everything is dynamic. A few trivial changes to {{Command}} & {{CommandFactory}} to support nested classes needed for -help/-usage to access the {{CommandFactory}}. Break shell object instantiation, and population of commandFactory, into separate methods so DFSAdmin (already a subclass) can eventually take advantage of the modularity. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15819-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 17:35:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD9BD6025 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16451 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16394 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16182 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0EFF32ED for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <945323235.66446.1307122487771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043896#comment-13043896 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7353: ------------------------------------- I also removed the slew of pre-existing warnings in {{FsShell}}... > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15820-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 17:35:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D48B6057 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17883 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17852 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17816 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 17:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761FBF32E6 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <39296727.66439.1307122487480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043894#comment-13043894 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7353: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481372/HADOOP-7353.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/569//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/569//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/569//console This message is automatically generated. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15821-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12A2D6B47 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85198 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85158 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85078 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC12F20F6 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7357 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Reporter: Philip Zeyliger Assignee: Philip Zeyliger Priority: Trivial Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt It's convenient to run something like {noformat} HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo {noformat} but the error code it returns isn't interesting. 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15822-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CE446B58 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85645 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85616 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85332 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FDCF20F9 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1863949665.66597.1307124707602.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-7357: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15823-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:12:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E79306B75 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85991 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85919 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85857 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:12:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:12:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC68F2109 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1308624728.66612.1307124708178.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-7357: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15824-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 123AC635E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99836 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99801 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99761 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD1CF2353 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1951159417.66630.1307124947569.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043930#comment-13043930 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7357: ------------------------------------- Why not get rid of the try/catch completely and just let the exception propagate out of main? That would produce the correct error code as well and remove 5 lines of code. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15825-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C4646391 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 213 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 182 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 174 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7651F2358 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <575109744.66633.1307124947681.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7357: ----------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Hi Philip, This patch won't apply as-is. Looks to me like you generated it using `git show'. Please regenerate the patch using `git diff'. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15826-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:18:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C1276DEC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4354 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:18:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4299 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:18:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4161 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:18:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:18:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3218F248F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <409900072.66640.1307125067730.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7357: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) I take it all back! `patch' is smarter than I gave it credit for. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15827-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F8E068EC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15156 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15128 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15119 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176AFF27E2 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1816598440.66669.1307125428092.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043937#comment-13043937 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Super nitty review on the javadoc: - Javadoc style guide at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html says the following about punctuation and capitalization for @param and @return: {quote} The description begins with a lowercase letter if it is a phrase (contains no verb), or an uppercase letter if it is a sentence. End the phrase with a period only if another phrase or sentence follows it. {quote} (ie the @param and @returns should start with lower case letters) - following should read "the buffer *into* which data is read" in two places: + * @param buffer The buffer in which data is read. - for the readFully javadoc, @param length should say "the exact number of bytes to read" or "the number of bytes" rather than "the maximum" given the contract of readFully. - for readFully, we should also specify that, even if it throws an exception, it may modify an undetermined number of bytes in the target buffer. - typo: "altenate" should be "alternate" > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15828-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:24:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 903506901 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15784 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15742 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15734 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34191F27E6 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <339156762.66673.1307125428210.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Philip Zeyliger updated HADOOP-7357: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt Removing the entire try catch, as per Todd's suggestion. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt, HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15829-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:24:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19632691E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16349 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16300 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16259 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:24:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B86BF27EC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1385534528.66679.1307125428437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043939#comment-13043939 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7357: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481384/HADOOP-7357.patch.txt against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/570//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/570//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/570//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt, HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15830-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 18:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FC636731 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45854 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45820 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 18:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45807 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 18:34:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:34:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE82F2E4E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <567245774.66767.1307126027700.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043952#comment-13043952 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7357: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481388/HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/571//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt, HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15831-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 19:47:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C9A8624E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1498 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 19:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1361 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 19:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1328 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 19:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF433F377D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <977670648.66991.1307130407780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13043998#comment-13043998 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7314: --------------------------------------------- new UrlValidator(UrlValidator.ALLOW_ALL_SCHEMES); is called every time verifyHostnames is called. It would probably be better to have a private member for this, and if it is reentrant have a static private instance. > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15832-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 20:37:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA2EC6ACB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80459 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80402 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80393 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 20:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5561EF3817 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956847682.67114.1307133407346.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044024#comment-13044024 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7325: ------------------------------------- nits: - I don't think you need the comments explaining bash [[ vs [ - if you do want to keep them, there's a typo: bra*c*ket is missing its 'c'. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15833-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 20:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 183A0645B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4250 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4212 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4204 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8A1F3C02 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1620300939.67157.1307134127777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1267239290.66594.1307124707441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7357) hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044035#comment-13044035 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7357: ------------------------------------- Can you re-upload latest patch with --no-prefix? > hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec#main() should exit with non-zero exit code if test failed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7357 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7357 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7357-v2.patch.txt, HADOOP-7357.patch.txt > > > It's convenient to run something like > {noformat} > HADOOP_CLASSPATH=hadoop-test-0.20.2.jar bin/hadoop org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec -count 3 -codec fo > {noformat} > but the error code it returns isn't interesting. > 1-line patch attached fixes that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15834-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 20:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DD3F6474 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4528 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4462 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4441 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 20:49:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:49:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D96F3C03 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <157754166.67158.1307134127807.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-7325: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch nit's resolved. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15835-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 20:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 268016998 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19869 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19843 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 20:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19835 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 20:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA78F3DAB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <342452528.67171.1307134487761.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7346.txt Rebased against trunk and removed spurious whitespace change. I'll commit based on Cos's +1 if this passes Hudson (no code change since previous patch) > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15836-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 037D86772 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47927 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47883 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47875 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91445F3249 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <979523855.67211.1307135087591.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Marking JIRA resolved, since Sanjay committed this last week. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash11.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15837-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:05:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1688467C5 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48958 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48915 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48860 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B399FF324E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <445964104.67216.1307135087732.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044055#comment-13044055 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7325: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481405/hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/572//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/572//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/572//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15838-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:12:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D316A20 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63948 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:12:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63904 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:12:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63896 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:12:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:12:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:12:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57610F33F1 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2139418896.67228.1307135507354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-7325: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch Slightly too agressive on comment deletion. I think the first comment was useful. Updated. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15839-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:15:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FF7F6AF5 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66497 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:15:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66470 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66462 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:15:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:15:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:14:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BAAF34AC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:14:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <353376378.67233.1307135658794.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044059#comment-13044059 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7346: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481406/hadoop-7346.txt against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/573//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/573//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/573//console This message is automatically generated. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15840-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:20:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E1356299 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80234 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80187 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80167 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:20:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FDBF379C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <994429901.67267.1307135988131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15841-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:20:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97FA6629F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80279 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80190 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80168 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:20:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:20:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:20:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53406F37A1 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2111585105.67272.1307135988337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7339: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) canceling patch available status pending a benchmark > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15842-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF4C0658F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89564 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89524 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89516 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53193F3907 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1069887525.67287.1307136227337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044068#comment-13044068 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7325: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481408/hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch against trunk revision 1130833. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/574//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/574//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/574//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15843-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:41:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC65B6E69 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9408 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9347 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9151 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:41:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:41:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:41:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2496FF3D3B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1699201797.67317.1307137248146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044073#comment-13044073 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------------ If we don't hear from Cos by end of day, I'll commit this since we accepted his comment and passed Jenkins test, and no one else has commented in four days. Also, this just mirrors the already committed HADOOP-7322. Thanks. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15844-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:46:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8DC76987 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15594 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15558 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDCBF3E42 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1597399507.67325.1307137547450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7358) Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7358 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.22.0 When a server implementation throws an exception handling an RPC, the Handler thread catches it and logs it before responding with the exception over the IPC channel. This is currently done at INFO level. I'd like to propose that, if the exception is an unchecked exception, it should be logged at WARN level instead. This can help alert operators when they might be hitting some kind of bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15845-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:52:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 193456681 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24868 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24840 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24832 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC55F3FBC for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <612451200.67332.1307137907769.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1597399507.67325.1307137547450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7358) Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7358: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7358.txt Simple patch attached. No test case since it's just a log level change. > Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7358.txt > > > When a server implementation throws an exception handling an RPC, the Handler thread catches it and logs it before responding with the exception over the IPC channel. This is currently done at INFO level. > I'd like to propose that, if the exception is an unchecked exception, it should be logged at WARN level instead. This can help alert operators when they might be hitting some kind of bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15846-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:54:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F06976DED for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37479 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37452 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37443 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAA2F30B7 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1776834545.67338.1307138027572.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044078#comment-13044078 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7346: ------------------------------------- I'd like to commit this to 0.22 branch, since it really helps with version transitions, and I think 0.22 should see more uptake than 0.21 did. It applies cleanly, the only issue is that it requires guava as a dependency in the tests. Anyone have an issue with my adding it to ivy? The other option is to not include the tests in the commit (or reimplement the two methods we need). Adding guava seems easiest and will also make it easier to backport other patches from trunk which might use it, so that' my preference. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15848-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 880B76F1C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42196 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42128 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42108 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:56:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADFCF3213 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272832913.67353.1307138147761.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044081#comment-13044081 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #637 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/637/]) HADOOP-7346. Send back nicer error message to clients using outdated IPC version. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131254 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15847-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 21:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A11CD6F25 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42188 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42126 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42107 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 21:56:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:56:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68C1F3214 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <625182446.67354.1307138147809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1597399507.67325.1307137547450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7358) Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044082#comment-13044082 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7358: ------------------------------------- +1 pending hudson > Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7358.txt > > > When a server implementation throws an exception handling an RPC, the Handler thread catches it and logs it before responding with the exception over the IPC channel. This is currently done at INFO level. > I'd like to propose that, if the exception is an unchecked exception, it should be logged at WARN level instead. This can help alert operators when they might be hitting some kind of bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15849-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:02:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DADC36EDB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53332 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53299 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53290 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA8F33A9 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1335100488.67366.1307138508123.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7316-3.patch Thanks Todd. Updated patch attached. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15850-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:04:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7B816823 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54422 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54388 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54380 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:04:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:04:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663C7F3457 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <690177636.67376.1307138627415.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15851-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:10:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A06C068EB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56978 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56952 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56944 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:10:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C63EF35C3 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <74123397.67390.1307138987374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044088#comment-13044088 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- +1 pending hudson > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15852-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:21:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7A7B6088 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71463 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71441 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71433 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4E1F38AD for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <719129071.67407.1307139647378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044092#comment-13044092 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7341: ---------------------------------------- +1, looks good to me. One nit: I'd recommend either removing the "@deprecated name is never used" from the comment, or changing the name of the parameter from "n" to "name". Outside of the context of this patch, the comment doesn't make much sense. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15853-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:25:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D302A6141 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79452 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79425 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79417 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:25:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA13F39CB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <6389285.67420.1307139887515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044094#comment-13044094 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7316: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481412/hadoop-7316-3.patch against trunk revision 1131254. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/575//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/575//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/575//console This message is automatically generated. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15854-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A766226 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83471 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83442 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83434 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2FEF3A75 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <958558303.67427.1307140007435.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks Todd! I've committed this. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15855-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 22:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F2B967AB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9046 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9019 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 22:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9011 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 22:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B60F316F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1853364238.67490.1307141147786.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044109#comment-13044109 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #638 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/638/]) HADOOP-7316. Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131268 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Command.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/PositionedReadable.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataOutputStream.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataInputStream.java > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15856-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:22:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30984695D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50663 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:22:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50630 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50622 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:22:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:22:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760A5F3999 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <820092696.67537.1307143307480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044121#comment-13044121 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Just to understand this a little better: Is the read() function also not expected to throw an EOF Exception if the user tried to read beyond EOF? > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15857-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6CA669A0 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52582 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52554 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52546 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B380F3A11 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <607210568.67544.1307143427567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7356-1.patch Fixed incorrect file references. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15858-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:34:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D943862C8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65396 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65371 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65363 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:34:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:34:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C25FF3CBB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1559119365.67568.1307144027374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044128#comment-13044128 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7356: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481416/HADOOP-7356-1.patch against trunk revision 1131268. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/576//console This message is automatically generated. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15859-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17BE46490 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71890 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:42:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71860 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:42:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71851 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:42:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:42:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:42:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89400F3EDF for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:41:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <177257759.67588.1307144508557.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.205.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 I committed this to trunk and the 20-security branch. Thanks, Robert! > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15860-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D223C65CD for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75621 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75576 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75568 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D30F3F50 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1637771486.67604.1307144627532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044134#comment-13044134 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Depends on the underlying InputStream. read (and readFully) result in a call to seek, which in the case of DFSInputStream throws an IOException if you try to seek past the length of the files. FSInputStream#readFully however throws an EOFException if the underlying call to read failed while FSInputStream#read will return whatever value the underlying call to read returned (will not throw an EOFException). So, per the javadoc, you only get the EOFException with readFully if you hit the EOF while reading. DFSInputStream#seek should really throw an EOFException if seeking beyond the end of stream, but changing it to do that now would break compatibility =( > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15861-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:53:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 242D06D20 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85198 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85173 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85165 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C53F31B6 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1086511869.67627.1307145167598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044138#comment-13044138 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- bq. DFSInputStream#seek should really throw an EOFException if seeking beyond the end of stream, but changing it to do that now would break compatibility =( Actually, Java's RandomAccessFile API lets you seek way past the end of a file with no exception. The next read() call will simply return -1. But asking for "position()" on the file's channel continues to return the past-eof offset. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15862-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DC236E71 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87399 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87371 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87363 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CF8F323D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1954153315.67641.1307145287671.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044140#comment-13044140 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7144: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #639 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/639/]) HADOOP-7144. Expose JMX metrics via JSON servlet. Contributed by Robert Joseph Evans cdouglas : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131289 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/TestJMXJsonServlet.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/JMXJsonServlet.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/package-info.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/jmx > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15863-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 3 23:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26350603E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93113 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93076 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2011 23:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93068 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2011 23:59:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:59:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:59:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D482DF33D8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1246510294.67670.1307145527867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044144#comment-13044144 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Thanks a lot Todd and Eli. Is it okay if I add this as a comment to DFSInputStream at some point? Because Daryn and I were both confused about the behavior and the above information really helps. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15864-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 00:03:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DF60633B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 679 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 00:03:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 649 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 00:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 641 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 00:03:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:03:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0322CF358F for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:02:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <180606880.67691.1307145768009.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044148#comment-13044148 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- Go for it! > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15865-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 01:13:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1846A6B03 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64803 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64761 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64610 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 01:13:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:13:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D9EE1175 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <563852709.67776.1307149967458.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044158#comment-13044158 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------------------ > ... Because Daryn and I were both confused about the behavior ... Hi John, I think the current behavior is not well designed. If it is the case, you may also fix it. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15866-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 02:09:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B0E94D67 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94679 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94653 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94645 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733A8E1C9C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1647883290.67848.1307153327468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044167#comment-13044167 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7335: ------------------------------------------------ > I'd appreciate if someone can test this on Windows/OSX ... Tried {{TestHttpServer}} and {{TestServletFilter}}. Seems working fine. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15867-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 02:09:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AACE4D74 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94969 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94913 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94905 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 02:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 02:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A5BE1CA2 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <586366198.67850.1307153327556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044168#comment-13044168 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7335: ------------------------------------------------ I mean tried on Windows/Cygwin. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15868-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 04:11:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F3B04DF9 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69214 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 04:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67886 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 04:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67871 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 04:11:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:11:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2661F3078 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2001738969.68013.1307160647923.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley reassigned HADOOP-7106: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Todd Lipcon (was: Nigel Daley) Todd agreed to take over this issue and coordinate with Jukka. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15869-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 04:37:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0F744E74 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81653 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 04:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81565 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 04:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81556 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 04:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62214F355B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 04:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1148988945.68061.1307162207398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044198#comment-13044198 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------- >> ... Because Daryn and I were both confused about the behavior ... > Hi John, I think the current behavior is not well designed. If it is the case, you may also fix it. Thanks Nicholas. I created HDFS-2033 to track read path design. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15870-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 06:54:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2884C4CCA for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30384 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 06:54:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30285 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 06:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30277 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 06:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615B7F480A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <190446662.68137.1307170427395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7342: ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks, Bharath! And thanks Cos for helping review. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15871-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 11:16:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4DD4474B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7659 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7605 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7591 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29312F4522 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <531037777.68390.1307186148165.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044275#comment-13044275 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #709 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/709/]) HADOOP-7346. Send back nicer error message to clients using outdated IPC version. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131254 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15874-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 11:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FD754759 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7956 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7713 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7621 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1781BF452D for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1514183650.68401.1307186149092.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044277#comment-13044277 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #709 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/709/]) HADOOP-7342. Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list avoid NPEs on File.list(). Contributed by Bharath Mundlapudi. mattf : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131330 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileUtil.java > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15872-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 11:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4712E477B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7698 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7630 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7581 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010B6F451D for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1218761597.68386.1307186148001.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044274#comment-13044274 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7144: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #709 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/709/]) HADOOP-7144. Expose JMX metrics via JSON servlet. Contributed by Robert Joseph Evans cdouglas : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131289 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/HttpServer.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/TestJMXJsonServlet.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/JMXJsonServlet.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/jmx/package-info.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/jmx > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15873-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 11:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94603478E for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7820 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7663 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7613 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED551F4529 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <889828892.68397.1307186148968.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044276#comment-13044276 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #709 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/709/]) HADOOP-7316. Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1131268 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Command.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/PositionedReadable.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataOutputStream.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataInputStream.java > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch, hadoop-7316-3.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15875-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 17:26:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4120D4355 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49953 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 17:26:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49903 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 17:26:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49859 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 17:26:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:26:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:26:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA372F4369 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Travis Crawford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pluggable interface for cluster membership ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7359 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Travis Crawford Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. DETAILS: Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15876-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 20:26:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE5874DE7 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34522 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34491 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34483 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 20:26:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:26:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9AE1005BD for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <860037502.68989.1307219147375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7305: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch This is an updated patch to fix the problems that were reported on OS X. I've tried to make this as "fail safe" as possible. However do not have access to OS X to try it out. This should be tested by others before comitting. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15877-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 20:40:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01DEE4547 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42002 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41970 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41962 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 20:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA85100771 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <257999243.69000.1307219987638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes reopened HADOOP-7305: ---------------------------------- Apparently there are some issues with the first version in combination with OS X. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15878-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 20:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADB0245DC for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45325 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45302 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 20:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45294 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 20:42:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:42:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632DC1007C2 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1301308449.69002.1307220107403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7305: --------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) This new patch should fix the reported issues. This needs to be teste by someone with OS X because I do not have access to such a system. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15879-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 21:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F8DE4A70 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76111 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75991 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75983 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 21:05:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953AF100B2C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1978564108.69032.1307221487607.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044394#comment-13044394 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7305: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481469/HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch against trunk revision 1131330. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/577//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/577//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/577//console This message is automatically generated. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15880-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 4 23:39:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BB104BEA for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69686 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 23:39:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69649 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2011 23:39:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69641 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2011 23:39:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:39:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:39:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EEC1002AB for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1562375312.69142.1307230727995.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044414#comment-13044414 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7359: ------------------------------------- Sounds like a reasonable design to me! > Pluggable interface for cluster membership > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7359 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Travis Crawford > > Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. > To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. > DETAILS: > Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. > The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. > Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. > Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class > Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15881-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 05:20:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 811F56BDD for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 05:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97353 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 05:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97322 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 05:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97313 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 05:20:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:20:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:20:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D591005A9 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Travis Crawford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1431870602.69375.1307251187356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Crawford updated HADOOP-7359: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7359.diff Common portion of proposed change. > Pluggable interface for cluster membership > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7359 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Travis Crawford > Attachments: HADOOP-7359.diff > > > Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. > To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. > DETAILS: > Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. > The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. > Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. > Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class > Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15882-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 21:44:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ECBB61AA for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74616 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 21:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74574 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 21:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74566 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 21:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57570102859 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1100898366.70175.1307310227354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7341-3.patch Per Aaron, alter text related to deprecation. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15883-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:00:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 821C7687F for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87339 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:00:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87200 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87192 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:00:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:00:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:00:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA9102B87 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <152940744.70215.1307311188282.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6385) dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-6385: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Scott Phillips > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6385.patch > > > From HDFS-639 > > Given we have a mkdir, we should have a rmdir. Using rmr is not > > a reasonable substitute when you only want to delete empty > > directories. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15884-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:02:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E51776254 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89213 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89170 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:02:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89162 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:02:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:02:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:02:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E744102BE2 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1765230389.70218.1307311307514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6385) dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-6385: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6385-2.patch > dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Scott Phillips > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385.patch > > > From HDFS-639 > > Given we have a mkdir, we should have a rmdir. Using rmr is not > > a reasonable substitute when you only want to delete empty > > directories. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15885-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:04:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CB656BA2 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89668 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:04:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:04:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89624 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:04:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:04:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:04:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F693102C55 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1523854424.70223.1307311427322.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044632#comment-13044632 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7341: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481523/HADOOP-7341-3.patch against trunk revision 1131330. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/578//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/578//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/578//console This message is automatically generated. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15886-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:08:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4DF86F12 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93117 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93090 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93082 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:08:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:08:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:08:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87508102D03 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1849684169.70230.1307311667550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6385) dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-6385: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6385-2.patch > dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Scott Phillips > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385.patch > > > From HDFS-639 > > Given we have a mkdir, we should have a rmdir. Using rmr is not > > a reasonable substitute when you only want to delete empty > > directories. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15887-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:10:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB67D6F51 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95569 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:10:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95533 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:10:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95525 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:10:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:10:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:10:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580E7102D6C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1793545812.70235.1307311787357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6385) dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-6385: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Scott Phillips > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385.patch > > > From HDFS-639 > > Given we have a mkdir, we should have a rmdir. Using rmr is not > > a reasonable substitute when you only want to delete empty > > directories. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15888-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 22:24:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E471C6785 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7496 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7358 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 22:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7281 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 22:24:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:24:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F39102F48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <624510738.70252.1307312627418.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6385) dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044637#comment-13044637 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6385: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481525/HADOOP-6385-2.patch against trunk revision 1131330. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/579//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/579//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/579//console This message is automatically generated. > dfs does not support -rmdir (was HDFS-639) > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Scott Phillips > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385-2.patch, HADOOP-6385.patch > > > From HDFS-639 > > Given we have a mkdir, we should have a rmdir. Using rmr is not > > a reasonable substitute when you only want to delete empty > > directories. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15889-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 23:42:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA0C06BF9 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90776 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 23:42:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90740 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 23:42:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90732 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 23:42:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:42:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:42:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDF410290A for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2004248917.70295.1307317307377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044649#comment-13044649 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7341: ---------------------------------------- +1, looks good to me. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15890-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 5 23:44:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF21B6D98 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93521 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 23:44:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93490 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2011 23:44:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93468 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2011 23:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86D9102997 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <382631848.70301.1307317427949.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed based on atm's +1 (he's still waiting on his ASF account to get set up) > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15891-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 00:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B114E6209 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23217 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23183 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23169 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:06:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212C2102CC0 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:05:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1924883569.70314.1307318748132.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044656#comment-13044656 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #641 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/641/]) HADOOP-7341. Fix options parsing in CommandFormat. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132505 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CopyCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Touchz.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/MoveCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsUsage.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestCommandFormat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Stat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Test.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Mkdir.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Count.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Tail.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/SetReplication.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Ls.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Display.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandFormat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShellPermissions.java > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15892-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 00:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B00436207 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23267 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23187 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23172 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 00:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:06:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41756102CC4 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:05:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1844967408.70318.1307318748265.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044657#comment-13044657 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7342: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #641 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/641/]) > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch, HADOOP-7342-2.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15893-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 01:10:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 037B168C4 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44969 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44904 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44896 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:10:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A51102687 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <218273058.70401.1307322587802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044670#comment-13044670 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7335: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention, /dev/urandom has been in Solaris since 2.6. > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15894-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 01:10:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 681B868D1 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45212 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45168 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45160 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:10:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:10:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:10:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D51E102681 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1375210162.70395.1307322587575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044668#comment-13044668 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7335: ------------------------------------- +1 lgtm OSX has supported /dev/urandom since at least 10.2. From http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/darwin/reference/manpages/man4/random.4.html {quote} /dev/urandom is a compatibility nod to Linux. On Linux, /dev/urandom will produce lower quality output if the entropy pool drains, while /dev/random will prefer to block and wait for additional entropy to be collected. With Yarrow, this choice and distinction is not necessary, and the two devices behave identically. You may use either. {quote} > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15895-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 01:38:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 036E26AFB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70640 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:38:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70614 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:38:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70606 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:38:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:38:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:38:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAF1102A5E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1748376894.70409.1307324267573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044671#comment-13044671 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #642 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/642/]) HADOOP-7335. Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132511 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15896-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 01:42:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0C8C6C52 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73578 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73539 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 01:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73531 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 01:42:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:42:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B857E102B42 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2135608068.70419.1307324507752.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to branch 22 and trunk. Thanks Todd! (the hudson results are green btw: https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/642. Not sure why they haven't been posted to jira) > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15897-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 05:33:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 565FF46D9 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11160 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10977 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10957 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:33:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:33:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50C81027B6 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1695882960.70852.1307338367672.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044719#comment-13044719 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7346: ------------------------------------- I checked with Nigel, he said he was cool with adding guava as a dependency in 0.22. So I've committed this to 22 as well. > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15898-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 05:33:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E18746DB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11245 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10986 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10964 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 05:33:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:33:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 05:33:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86C11027BB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1091105669.70854.1307338367752.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks for the review, Cos! > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15899-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 08:04:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DCD440E2 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75323 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:04:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70900 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69127 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 08:04:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:04:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:04:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4EB102B19 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15900-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 08:06:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6E6A40FC for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75994 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:06:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75893 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75885 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 08:06:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:06:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:06:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665E3102C12 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1655224328.70972.1307347547415.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044740#comment-13044740 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7353: ---------------------------------------- Looks pretty good, Daryn. A few small nits: * There's no need to expressly initialize the instance variables in the {{FsShell} ctor to {{null}}. Java will do that automatically. * "The follow methods are syntactic sugar." - They're not really "_syntactic_" sugar, as much as they are just helpers. * "if (instance == null) throw new UnknownCommandException(cmd);" - coding guidelines say to put always use braces on {{if}} statements, and always put the body on a new line. * There seems to be an inconsistency with printing to stdout vs. stderr, or at least I can't tell why you chose to use one in some places, and the other in other places. * "// historical abstract method in Command " - move this comment above the method. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15901-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 08:12:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D6EC4417 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85514 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:12:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85436 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85425 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 08:12:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:12:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:12:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57810102E16 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <998005864.70980.1307347907355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7360: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7360.patch {{PathData}} retains all forms of relativity in a glob, including whether the authority is present or absent (ie. hdfs://host/path or hdfs:///path). Streamlines the {{PathData}} ctors, and converts most to private since they were only public to ease the redesign. Changed {{CLITestHelper}} to expand keywords not only in the commands, but also in the expected output. Notably this allows NAMENODE to be used in the expected output instead of fuzzy regexps. > FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7360 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7360.patch > > > FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15902-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 08:14:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D64214537 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87901 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87867 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 08:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87859 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 08:14:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:14:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB47C102F25 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1576993123.70984.1307348027698.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7360: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7360 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7360.patch > > > FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15903-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 09:45:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFBA94BD8 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83445 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83403 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83395 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:45:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE6A36681 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1864654885.54.1307353499389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <647927887.58055.1306890116067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7346) Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044763#comment-13044763 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7346: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #62 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/62/]) HADOOP-7346. Send back nicer error message to clients using outdated IPC version. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132528 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/ivy/libraries.properties * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/ivy.xml > Send back nicer error to clients using outdated IPC version > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7346 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7346 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt, hadoop-7346.txt > > > When an older Hadoop version tries to contact a newer Hadoop version across an IPC protocol version bump, the client currently just gets a non-useful error message like "EOFException". > Instead, the IPC server code can speak just enough of prior IPC protocols to send back a "fatal" message indicating the version mismatch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15904-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 09:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 905BD4C19 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83692 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83660 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83652 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 09:45:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:45:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:45:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B7836680 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2118717856.53.1307353499360.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044762#comment-13044762 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #62 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/62/]) HADOOP-7335. svn merge -c 1132511 from trunk eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132512 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestSequenceFile.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/build.xml > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15905-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 11:16:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C8D14A94 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99827 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99791 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99783 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6CC36475 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1427323806.143.1307358959125.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044786#comment-13044786 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7335: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #711 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/711/]) HADOOP-7335. Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132511 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml > Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7335.txt > > > Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. > We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15906-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 11:16:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB3AF4AA7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 191 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 129 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99898 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCE836477 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <870430342.145.1307358959184.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044787#comment-13044787 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #711 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/711/]) HADOOP-7341. Fix options parsing in CommandFormat. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132505 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CopyCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Touchz.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/MoveCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsUsage.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestCommandFormat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Stat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Test.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Mkdir.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Count.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Tail.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/SetReplication.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Ls.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Display.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandFormat.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShellPermissions.java > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341-3.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15907-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 15:33:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E6C14CC6 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77619 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:33:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77589 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77581 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 15:33:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:33:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:33:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2548C103C69 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:32:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <595565442.702.1307374379149.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7353-2.patch Thanks Aaron! bq. There's no need to expressly initialize the instance variables in the {{FsShell}} ctor to {{null}}. Java will do that automatically. Sure, I removed the initialization. bq. "The follow methods are syntactic sugar." - They're not really "syntactic" sugar, as much as they are just helpers. Changed. bq. "if (instance == null) throw new UnknownCommandException(cmd);" - coding guidelines say to put always use braces on if statements, and always put the body on a new line. Changed. I found a few more, so I changed them too. bq. There seems to be an inconsistency with printing to stdout vs. stderr, or at least I can't tell why you chose to use one in some places, and the other in other places. The -help/-usage commands will print to stdout. The usage goes to stderr when no command is given, or because of an illegal argument. bq. "// historical abstract method in Command " - move this comment above the method. Moved. Thanks again! > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15908-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 15:55:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42A3F49D3 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44515 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44402 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 15:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44394 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 15:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E512E10354A for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 15:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1885923335.775.1307375698935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044923#comment-13044923 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7353: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481578/HADOOP-7353-2.patch against trunk revision 1132511. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/581//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/581//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/581//console This message is automatically generated. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15909-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 16:51:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3531546DC for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78335 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78303 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78287 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:51:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:51:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68B7103DBA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:50:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1389573820.914.1307379059940.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: mvn-layout-e.sh HADOOP-6671-e.patch Patch rebased to HEAD of trunk (use the Now jdiff works (same as in Ant build) Build options in BUILDING.txt file. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15910-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 16:51:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4412F46EB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78615 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78578 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78570 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 16:51:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:51:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:51:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421F103DD5 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:51:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1157166038.939.1307379061013.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044950#comment-13044950 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- If folks agree I'd like to work with Tom in a new branch to get all the Jenkins hook scripts working. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15911-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 16:54:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AA794908 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86813 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:54:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86768 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 16:54:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86760 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 16:54:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:54:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:54:23 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DADF103EF9 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1268078813.964.1307379243052.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044951#comment-13044951 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481585/mvn-layout-e.sh against trunk revision 1132511. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/582//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15912-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 17:17:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21DAB473A for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47889 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47865 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 17:17:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47857 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 17:17:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:17:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:17:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF89103981 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:16:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1272005493.1015.1307380618913.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044963#comment-13044963 ] Jeffrey Naisbitt commented on HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------------ Thanks for the review, Robert! I think you meant this comment to go with the MAPREDUCE-2489 patch though, and I will address it there. :) > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15913-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 18:23:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 466D94413 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86104 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 18:23:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86072 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 18:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86064 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 18:23:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:23:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:23:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11180104F95 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <411325994.1238.1307384579066.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15914-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 19:43:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 005464B09 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7146 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 19:43:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7076 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 19:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7068 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 19:43:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:43:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F862104E5F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2029521589.1587.1307389379650.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21049979.212171296037723374.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7119) add Kerberos HTTP SPNEGO authentication support to Hadoop JT/NN/DN/TT web-consoles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045045#comment-13045045 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7119: -------------------------------------------- I'm working on an update for this patch that would bring all Alfredo code into Hadoop. > add Kerberos HTTP SPNEGO authentication support to Hadoop JT/NN/DN/TT web-consoles > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7119 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7119 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: all > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: ha-common-01.patch, ha-common-02.patch, ha-commons.patch > > > Currently the JT/NN/DN/TT web-consoles don't support any form of authentication. > Hadoop RPC API already supports Kerberos authentication. > Kerberos enables single sign-on. > Popular browsers (Firefox and Internet Explorer) have support for Kerberos HTTP SPNEGO. > Adding support for Kerberos HTTP SPNEGO to Hadoop web consoles would provide a unified authentication mechanism and single sign-on for Hadoop web UI and Hadoop RPC. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15915-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:23:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66F7D4225 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77981 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:23:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77946 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:23:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77938 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:23:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:23:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:23:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C004104D14 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:22:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <340734413.1734.1307391779242.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045068#comment-13045068 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7353: ---------------------------------------- +1, latest patch looks good to me. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15916-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:49:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21F3749F3 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40486 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:49:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40460 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:49:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40452 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:49:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:49:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:49:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F381A1047AA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1938764894.1836.1307393338994.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045088#comment-13045088 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------------- we also need this for trunk, right? {code} todd@todd-w510:~/svn/hadoop-common-trunk-commit$ ./bin/hadoop fs -cat /asdf ./bin/hadoop: line 24: /home/todd/svn/hadoop-common-trunk-commit/bin/../libexec/hadoop-config.sh: No such file or directory ... {code} > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15917-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:55:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6772C4B6B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50501 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:55:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50452 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:55:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50422 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:55:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8E910499C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1497643120.1845.1307393699121.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk based on atm's +1 and a quick sanity check. Thanks Daryn/Aaron. > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15918-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:59:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 888BB4DB4 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58236 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58153 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58145 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67807104BC8 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <418964100.1864.1307393939420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7323: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15919-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:59:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D3AA4DC6 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58471 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58436 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58428 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2931F104BC3 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1758092272.1859.1307393939165.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15920-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 20:59:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14E2C4DD6 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58721 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58677 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58669 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 20:59:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 20:59:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F3E104BD3 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1183989455.1874.1307393939734.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk and 0.22. Thanks, Brock! Please do file patches for bin/hdfs and bin/mapred in those projects as well. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15921-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:05:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 948574742 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74035 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:05:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74005 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:05:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73997 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:05:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:05:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:05:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1C4104EEE for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1727294441.1911.1307394299386.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch Same patch for trunk. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15922-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:15:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3175C4F3C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98556 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98500 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98372 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB141043EE for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <961978861.1976.1307394931831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045119#comment-13045119 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #643 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/643/]) HADOOP-7353. Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stack traces. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132764 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Count.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/cli/testConf.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Command.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Display.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15923-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:15:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47B44F62 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98900 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98862 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98854 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3C11043DD for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <621194069.1964.1307394931435.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045116#comment-13045116 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------------- +1 for trunk patch. I'll commit there, and leave others to review the 205 branch. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15924-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:15:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00CAD4F71 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99122 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99098 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99046 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7365B1043DE for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1490709616.1965.1307394931469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045117#comment-13045117 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481301/HADOOP-7323.patch against trunk revision 1132769. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/584//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/584//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/584//console This message is automatically generated. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15925-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:15:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B3DC4F85 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99384 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99339 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99331 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:15:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:15:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DA91043EA for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <26782368.1974.1307394931757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045118#comment-13045118 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #643 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/643/]) HADOOP-7325. The hadoop command should not accept class names starting with a hyphen. Contributed by Brock Noland. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132769 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15926-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:19:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4458E4FD4 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4550 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:19:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4460 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:19:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4452 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:19:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:19:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:19:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0556910455B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:19:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <797409138.1985.1307395140018.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045122#comment-13045122 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7356: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481624/HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch against trunk revision 1132776. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/585//console This message is automatically generated. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15927-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:21:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E58D458C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8762 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:21:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8710 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:21:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8618 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:21:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:21:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:21:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219B710463E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1035210085.1994.1307395259134.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045124#comment-13045124 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------------- Hudson's complaining above because it tried to apply the patch after I already did. I didn't wait for Hudson since it only affects the scripts which are tested manually anyway. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15928-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:29:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 333F8489E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32939 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:29:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32909 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32900 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:29:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:29:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:29:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F187F10490D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:28:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1662758371.2010.1307395738985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045127#comment-13045127 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------------- hmm, the two most recent patches are identical best I can see... > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15929-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6E7D4FE7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37985 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37949 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37941 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F83104A29 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1288284645.2021.1307395859414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7361) Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon moved HDFS-1608 to HADOOP-7361: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: hdfs client) fs Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) (was: 0.20.1) Key: HADOOP-7361 (was: HDFS-1608) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7361 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1608-src.patch, HDFS-1608-test.patch > > > FileSystem has the API > *public void copyFromLocalFile(boolean delSrc, boolean overwrite, Path[] srcs, Path dst)* > > > This API provides overwrite option. But the mapping command line doesn't have this option. To maintain the consistency and better usage the command line option also can support the overwrite option like to put the files forcefully. ( put [-f] ) and also for copyFromLocal command line option. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15930-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:31:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDFB84049 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38765 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38731 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38723 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D80104A2B for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1507757141.2023.1307395859471.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7361) Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7361: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) moved the JIRA to common Can you please provide an up-to-date patch against trunk? thx > Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7361 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1608-src.patch, HDFS-1608-test.patch > > > FileSystem has the API > *public void copyFromLocalFile(boolean delSrc, boolean overwrite, Path[] srcs, Path dst)* > > > This API provides overwrite option. But the mapping command line doesn't have this option. To maintain the consistency and better usage the command line option also can support the overwrite option like to put the files forcefully. ( put [-f] ) and also for copyFromLocal command line option. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15931-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:31:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA0CE4070 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39177 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39133 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39080 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:31:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:31:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19EB104A39 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1126260074.2036.1307395859986.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7269: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) canceling patch status while waiting on test improvement > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15932-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:35:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DEAF400C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43470 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43412 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43132 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:35:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:35:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B786104C5D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1795750470.2063.1307396099568.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045136#comment-13045136 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7356: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #644 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/644/]) HADOOP-7356. RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script in developer environment. Contributed by Eric Yang. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132776 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemons.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/stop-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/start-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/slaves.sh > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15933-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:43:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 537D64274 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53453 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:43:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53426 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53418 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:43:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:43:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B244104F5A for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:42:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <667184657.2110.1307396579042.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7350.patch Sorry - this should be the right patch now. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15934-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EB1445AF for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54989 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54961 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54949 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:45:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:45:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:45:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EF6104FF7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1097193812.2116.1307396699086.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045146#comment-13045146 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #63 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/63/]) HADOOP-7325. The hadoop command should not accept class names starting with a hyphen. Contributed by Brock Noland. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132768 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15935-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 21:53:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E5614AD9 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67055 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:53:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67026 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 21:53:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67018 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 21:53:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:53:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:53:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5121042BD for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:52:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1329992262.2136.1307397179181.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7343: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.206.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 I committed this. Thanks, Tom! > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.206.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7343-20security.patch, HADOOP-7343-20security.patch > > > backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15936-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 6 22:05:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66D33478E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93729 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93707 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93699 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 22:05:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:05:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:05:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118D4104680 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:04:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1829634008.2160.1307397899068.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045155#comment-13045155 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481630/HADOOP-7350.patch against trunk revision 1132776. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/586//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/586//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/586//console This message is automatically generated. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15937-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 00:07:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796E741EE for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81150 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 00:07:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81114 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 00:07:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81106 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 00:07:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:07:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:07:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E3B104A6F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:06:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1596151778.2498.1307405219291.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045216#comment-13045216 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------------- Curious: why the change to only load once in the static initializer? > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15938-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 10:54:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 586836149 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3578 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:54:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3394 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:54:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3382 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 10:54:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:54:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43BE8949E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <405621887.55.1307444038866.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045358#comment-13045358 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7339: ---------------------------------- terasort 1GB on the same cluster , each job is ran more than 10 times, using intel vtune for profiling. # buffer(8KB) + pure java crc32 , 58.6s (CPU) # buffer(1MB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32 (JNI), 60.8s (CPU) # buffer(64KB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32 (JNI), 61.3s (CPU) # pure java crc32, 62.0s (CPU) # buffer(8KB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32, 64.1s (CPU) # zlib crc32(JNI), 69.8s (CPU) # intel ipp optimized zlib crc32, 703.s (CPU) It shows that BufferedChecksum + PureJavaCrc32 should be the best choice. Thanks Kungong for sharing and testing the original patch. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15939-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 10:56:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E0DA619B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4963 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4933 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4924 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 10:56:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:56:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F9D8960D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:55:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <378456417.62.1307444158877.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045359#comment-13045359 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7339: ---------------------------------- oops, some typos in the previous comment. terasort 1GB on the same cluster , each job is ran more than 10 times, using intel vtune for profiling. buffer(8KB) + pure java crc32 , 58.6s (CPU) buffer(1MB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32 (JNI), 60.8s (CPU) buffer(64KB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32 (JNI), 61.3s (CPU) pure java crc32, 62.0s (CPU) buffer(8KB) + intel ipp optimized zlib crc32, 64.1s (CPU) zlib crc32(JNI), 69.8s (CPU) intel ipp optimized zlib crc32, 70.3 s (CPU) It shows that BufferedChecksum + PureJavaCrc32 should be the best choice. Thanks Kungu for sharing and testing the original patch. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15940-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 10:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A5DE6215 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8360 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8325 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 10:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8317 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 10:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:58:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB3A896D2 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7362 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Arun C Murthy Assignee: Arun C Murthy It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15941-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 11:00:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53DB3644E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12439 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12372 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:00:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12358 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 11:00:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:00:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:00:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1112897CA for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:59:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1059055041.73.1307444398852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045361#comment-13045361 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------------- I'm open to other suggestions in-lieu of (custom) annotations... Eventually it will be nice to hack jcarder or some such tool to understand these! Thoughts? > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15942-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 11:04:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 118C0680B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15930 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:04:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15897 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:04:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15889 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 11:04:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:04:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:04:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC058994B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:03:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1718904113.77.1307444638781.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045362#comment-13045362 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7362: ---------------------------------- +1 for the idea. This would be very nice for developers inspecting whether a method of a class(or its inheritors) have a lock or not. > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15943-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 11:16:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 371766E1E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39900 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39863 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39855 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE37C89DFD for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <338455421.90.1307445358972.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045365#comment-13045365 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #712 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/712/]) HADOOP-7325. The hadoop command should not accept class names starting with a hyphen. Contributed by Brock Noland. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132769 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15944-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 11:16:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02C7F6E38 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40157 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40116 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40108 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1800A89E02 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <930634834.93.1307445359095.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045366#comment-13045366 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7356: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #712 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/712/]) HADOOP-7356. RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script in developer environment. Contributed by Eric Yang. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132776 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemons.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/stop-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/start-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/slaves.sh > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15945-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 11:16:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F1726E66 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40413 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40380 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40370 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 11:16:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE589E05 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1360093057.95.1307445359155.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <671647059.63008.1307027027379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7353) Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045367#comment-13045367 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7353: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #712 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/712/]) HADOOP-7353. Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stack traces. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1132764 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Count.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/cli/testConf.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Command.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Display.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java > Cleanup FsShell and prevent masking of RTE stacktraces > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7353 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7353 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7353-2.patch, HADOOP-7353.patch > > > {{FsShell}}'s top level exception handler catches and displays exceptions. Unfortunately it displays only the first line of an exception, which means an unexpected {{RuntimeExceptions}} like {{NullPointerException}} only display "{{cmd: NullPointerException}}". This user has no context to understand and/or accurately report the issue. > Found due to bugs such as {{HADOOP-7327}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15946-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 12:01:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B82860A3 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16455 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 12:01:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16411 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 12:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16403 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 12:01:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:01:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:01:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B637B81BD for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:01:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <568806838.165.1307448060370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045382#comment-13045382 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------------- bq. This would be very nice for developers inspecting whether a method of a class(or its inheritors) have a lock or not. Precisely - it will aid developers to understand and reason locking, and serve as a documentation aid. I hope, eventually, we can tie this to a tool to do static/dynamic analysis e.g. jcarder. ---- OTOH, is there an existing mechanism we should be using in-lieu of the proposed annotation? > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15947-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 14:54:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46059665B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44656 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 14:54:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44593 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 14:54:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44584 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 14:54:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:54:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:54:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09648103539 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <217543967.528.1307458439035.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045463#comment-13045463 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/775/#review775 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ship it! +1 Looks good. - Tom On 2011-05-23 15:49:39, Jeffrey Naisbitt wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/775/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-05-23 15:49:39) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and hadoop-mapreduce. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7314. bq. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/DNSToSwitchMapping.java 1125067 bq. trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/ScriptBasedMapping.java 1125067 bq. trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/net/StaticMapping.java 1125067 bq. trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/net/TestScriptBasedMapping.java 1125067 bq. trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/CachedDNSToSwitchMapping.java 1125067 bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/775/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Jeffrey bq. bq. > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15948-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 16:30:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 591FC6DCF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85484 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85452 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85443 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 16:30:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:30:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:30:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE26103037 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:29:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <241587118.771.1307464198909.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045521#comment-13045521 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7362: ----------------------------------- The annotations from "Java Concurrency in Practice" may be appropriate here: http://jcip.net/annotations/doc/net/jcip/annotations/package-summary.html, in partciular http://jcip.net/annotations/doc/net/jcip/annotations/GuardedBy.html FindBugs has support for these annotations, not sure about JCarder. > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15949-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 16:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2ADF96209 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26157 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26085 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26077 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 16:50:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:50:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6CE1038C4 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:50:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <127653748.807.1307465405763.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045532#comment-13045532 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7362: ------------------------------------- JCarder doesn't currently support annotations, but I know that codebase pretty well, and could probably hack it in. One very simple thing you could do that doesn't require any analysis at all is: assert Thread.holdsLock(x) > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15950-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 16:54:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECA90635D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29040 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29003 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 16:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28994 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 16:54:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:54:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98CB103A40 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1920403017.813.1307465638822.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045534#comment-13045534 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------- JCarder doesn't use annotations, which is touted as its strength. +1 for using JCIP annotations and maybe other findbugs annotations, especially @CheckForNull etc. > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15951-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 17:01:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A45A6D09 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33807 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:01:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33771 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:01:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33763 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 17:01:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:01:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:01:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A04103D1B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1841439711.824.1307466059277.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045536#comment-13045536 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7362: ------------------------------------- I like the idea of using JCIP where possible, especially for its documentation value. But in code paths that aren't hot/performance sensitive, please let's not rely on things like static analysis and @CheckForNull to catch bugs. Good old fashioned asserts and checks like Preconditions.checkNotNull() have the nice side effect that anyone running tests will find the bug, and you can't just ignore it like you can static analysis results :) > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15952-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 17:32:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 393D66D25 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3610 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:32:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3563 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:32:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3555 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 17:32:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:32:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:32:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FB010683E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:31:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <158298796.897.1307467918824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7363 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Matt Foley Assignee: Matt Foley FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for FileSystem behavior. However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so. RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15953-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 17:42:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4026B29 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24690 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24647 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24639 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 17:42:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:42:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:42:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149C8106C0F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:41:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <509619184.917.1307468519081.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045555#comment-13045555 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------- The findbug annotations and runtime asserts are complimentary. You can use @CheckForNull on a field and findbugs will warn if checks (e.g., via Preconditions.checkNotNull) is not actually performed. > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15954-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 17:58:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3831867B1 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50106 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:58:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50068 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 17:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50060 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 17:58:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:58:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:58:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC3106044 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:57:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <649116224.935.1307469478905.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7350: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7350.patch I moved it to take advantage of the ServiceLoader's caching of providers. This new patch does that but moves the iteration back to the getCodecClasses() method. (This is now like the example in the ServiceLoader documentation.) > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15955-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 18:14:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA9F62B8 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86238 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:14:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86180 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:14:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86171 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 18:14:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:14:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:14:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D665B1065D1 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:13:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1260460150.971.1307470438874.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <640184672.61345.1306972728331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7350) Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045564#comment-13045564 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7350: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481726/HADOOP-7350.patch against trunk revision 1132776. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/587//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/587//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/587//console This message is automatically generated. > Use ServiceLoader to discover compression codec classes > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7350 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7350 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, io > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch, HADOOP-7350.patch > > > By using a ServiceLoader users wouldn't have to add codec classes to io.compression.codecs for codecs that aren't shipped with Hadoop (e.g. LZO), since they would be automatically picked up from the classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15956-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 18:34:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5E2F64FC for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38367 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38337 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38329 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 18:34:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:34:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:34:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E44106D77 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2034582327.1061.1307471639332.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7323: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks, Alejandro! > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15957-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 18:56:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95CF26FB8 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71991 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:56:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71958 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 18:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71950 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 18:56:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A7D10651D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:55:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <120748403.1093.1307472958953.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045590#comment-13045590 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7323: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #645 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/645/]) HADOOP-7323. Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name. Contributed by Alejandro Abdelnur. tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1133125 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodecFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodec.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/CompressionCodecFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/DeflateCodec.java > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15958-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 20:26:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A28836D05 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38546 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 20:26:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38500 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 20:26:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38448 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 20:26:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:26:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:26:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C705D10624A for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:25:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7364 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 Reporter: Thomas Graves Assignee: Thomas Graves TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15959-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:17:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B4C6723 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34021 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33991 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33976 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:17:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:17:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BE5106576 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <653059739.1352.1307481424220.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7364.patch > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Attachments: HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15960-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:17:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB37A672A for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34059 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33994 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33977 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:17:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:17:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:17:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B97106574 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:17:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1400491455.1350.1307481424146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7147) Native code does not build on BSD/OSX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045630#comment-13045630 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7147: ------------------------------------------ Actually, we probably want to ignore the call anyway. Looks like setnetgrent suffers from some really bizarro portability issues. On Linux, setnetgrent returns 1 on success. On Solaris, it returns 0. There is a side issue as well, at least on Solaris, where setnetgrent() will actually reset for *all* threads that are in the midst of enumerating netgroups. I haven't verified if this is true on Linux or other platforms. > Native code does not build on BSD/OSX > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15961-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:27:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0268565E7 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47363 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:27:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47321 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:27:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47255 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:27:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:27:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:27:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3847106871 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:26:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Clean up CHANGES.txt --------------------- Key: HADOOP-7365 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15962-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0045D6D57 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53418 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:31:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53390 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53382 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:31:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:31:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:31:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB23106955 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:30:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1021687240.1383.1307482258777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.205.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15963-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:34:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4760B6BE0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55491 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:34:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55462 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:34:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55452 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:34:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:34:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:34:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE805106A3B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1892899819.1387.1307482438908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045638#comment-13045638 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7364: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481744/HADOOP-7364.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/588//console This message is automatically generated. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15964-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:48:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE1836605 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83885 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:48:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83832 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:48:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83824 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:48:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:48:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:48:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291B5106E1F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:47:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1039693965.1392.1307483279165.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045641#comment-13045641 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7364: --------------------------------------- patch is for branch-0.20-205 not trunk. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15965-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:50:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F39C468C5 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89611 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:50:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89575 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:50:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89566 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:50:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:50:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:50:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5217106F17 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <986267073.1402.1307483398804.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045643#comment-13045643 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-7364: ------------------------------------ The patch won't apply for trunk. It should be against "src/test/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/MRCaching.java" of the mapreduce repo. +1 for the fix itself. I applied the patch to 0.20-security and the test passed. I ran the test with test.build.dir set to something other than "build/test". > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15966-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:58:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9AE86D94 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10949 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10915 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10907 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:58:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86201062C6 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1858395266.1440.1307483879685.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7147) Native code does not build on BSD/OSX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7147: ------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7147.patch This patch cleans up the variable re-use as well as changes setnetgrent by ignoring the return code. > Native code does not build on BSD/OSX > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7147.patch > > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15967-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 21:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE1EC6DA4 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11211 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11174 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11162 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 21:58:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:58:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:58:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F491062D7 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:58:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1742860930.1448.1307483880094.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7147) Native code does not build on BSD/OSX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7147: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Allen Wittenauer Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Native code does not build on BSD/OSX > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7147.patch > > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15968-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:05:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27DE3659E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28099 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:05:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28063 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:05:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28016 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:05:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:05:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:05:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A5F106639 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:04:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1157739578.1480.1307484298986.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch patch for trunk. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15969-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:09:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB279699F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45454 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:09:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45425 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:09:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45417 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:09:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:09:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:09:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7371D106879 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:08:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1756372488.1517.1307484539469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7147) setnetgrent in native code is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7147: ------------------------------------- Summary: setnetgrent in native code is not portable (was: Native code does not build on BSD/OSX) > setnetgrent in native code is not portable > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7147.patch > > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15970-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:11:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CEA46A88 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49513 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49352 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49315 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:11:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:11:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:11:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B187106972 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <768308636.1527.1307484659239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7366) OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7366 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: native Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 Reporter: Allen Wittenauer Priority: Minor On OS X, $JAVA_HOME doesn't have JNI headers. Another check is needed to locate them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15971-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:15:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27A586CFC for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71675 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71640 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71632 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34FE106B94 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <866739793.1546.1307484898927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045664#comment-13045664 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7364: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481749/HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/590//console This message is automatically generated. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15972-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:15:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EACE56D1A for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71948 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71915 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71907 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BC3106B9C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <852261344.1554.1307484899495.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7147) setnetgrent in native code is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045665#comment-13045665 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7147: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481747/hadoop-7147.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/589//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/589//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/589//console This message is automatically generated. > setnetgrent in native code is not portable > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7147.patch > > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15973-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:15:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2156F6D28 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72145 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72095 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72001 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC40106BA3 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <904358418.1560.1307484899704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <768308636.1527.1307484659239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7366) OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7366: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7366.patch > > > On OS X, $JAVA_HOME doesn't have JNI headers. Another check is needed to locate them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15974-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:15:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDDDE6D4D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72473 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72441 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72433 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC4D106B9F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <235540572.1556.1307484899573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <768308636.1527.1307484659239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7366) OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7366: ------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7366.patch If $JAVA_HOME/../Headers is a directory, we add this to the JNI_CPPFLAGS > OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7366.patch > > > On OS X, $JAVA_HOME doesn't have JNI headers. Another check is needed to locate them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15975-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:15:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 242436D60 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72722 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72691 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72682 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:15:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:15:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BA1106BA7 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1745218163.1563.1307484899798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2063003633.1960.1297925244935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7147) setnetgrent in native code is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7147: ------------------------------------- Component/s: native > setnetgrent in native code is not portable > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7147 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7147 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7147.patch > > > HADOOP-6864 uses the setnetgrent function in a way which is not compatible with BSD APIs, where the call returns void rather than int. This prevents the native libs from building on OSX, for example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15976-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:17:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D4AB671E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78992 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:17:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78958 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78950 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:17:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:17:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:17:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB761106CB5 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:16:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1164614461.1572.1307485018895.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <768308636.1527.1307484659239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7366) OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer reassigned HADOOP-7366: ---------------------------------------- Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7366.patch > > > On OS X, $JAVA_HOME doesn't have JNI headers. Another check is needed to locate them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15977-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:33:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DCF67AE for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20433 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20402 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:33:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20394 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:33:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:33:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:33:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3504106430 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:32:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1034745950.1628.1307485978796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045680#comment-13045680 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7364: --------------------------------------- hudson failed because patch applies to MAPREDUCE for trunk, going to file a separate JIRA for that and attach patch for trunk there. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15978-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:35:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C4136DC4 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22576 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22501 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22493 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:35:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:35:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DA2106507 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <386433635.1639.1307486098942.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <768308636.1527.1307484659239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7366) OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045681#comment-13045681 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7366: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481753/hadoop-7366.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/591//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/591//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/591//console This message is automatically generated. > OS X puts Java headers in non-standard place > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7366 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7366 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7366.patch > > > On OS X, $JAVA_HOME doesn't have JNI headers. Another check is needed to locate them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15979-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:37:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C786B6E52 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24421 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24374 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24319 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:37:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:37:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477691066A3 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1573829836.1656.1307486219289.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7365: ---------------------------------- Attachment: c.patch > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15980-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:37:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 803B86EA9 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26133 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26091 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26049 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:37:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:37:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:37:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4E71066AA for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1895298949.1661.1307486219452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7365: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15981-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:39:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 729A36FB0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31305 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:39:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31276 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31268 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:39:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:39:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:39:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB7810675B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:38:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1355797565.1667.1307486339110.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045687#comment-13045687 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7364: --------------------------------------- MAPREDUCE-2575 has patch for trunk. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15982-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:55:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB546E61 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55270 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:55:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55219 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:55:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55153 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:55:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F090E106B0E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1185920213.1690.1307487298981.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045693#comment-13045693 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7365: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481758/c.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/592//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/592//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/592//console This message is automatically generated. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15983-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 7 22:57:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB5C46EA4 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58023 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:57:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57994 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2011 22:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57986 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2011 22:57:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:57:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 22:57:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A2106B79 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:56:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <812783938.1699.1307487418752.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045695#comment-13045695 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7365: ------------------------------------------ Other than minor spacing issues and the fact that lots of people can't spell (myself included), it is much better. :) > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15984-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 01:30:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0582A6187 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83941 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 01:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83888 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 01:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83880 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 01:30:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:30:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:30:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86496106288 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:29:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1760112850.2026.1307496599546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-5611) C++ libraries do not build on Debian Lenny MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joep Rottinghuis updated HADOOP-5611: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20.205.0 This is not Debian specific. The same happens on RHEL6. The root cause is a cleanup of header files in Gcc 4.3 which exposes missing includes. As Sreekanth pointed out in HADOOP-5678, this is documented in http://www.cyrius.com/journal/2007/05/10#gcc-4.3-include RHEL5 uses gcc 4.1.2 RHEL6 uses gcc 4.4.5 Ubuntu Natty Narwhal uses gcc 4.5.2 This should be applied to branch-0.20-security and the 0.20.205 branch. Note that HADOOP-5611 must also be applied after this patch. > C++ libraries do not build on Debian Lenny > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5611 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5611 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1, 0.20.205.0 > Environment: Debian Lenny, 64 bit > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.20.2 > > Attachments: 0001-HADOOP-5611-Add-some-missing-includes-to-c-code-t.patch, HADOOP-5611-fixed.patch > > > The compilation of the C++ util and Hadoop Pipes code generates some errors about undefined functions. It appears there are just some missing includes that must not affect some other systems. Attaching a patch that fixes this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15985-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 01:34:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A0963F1 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85646 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85609 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85601 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:34:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:34:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6721063CB for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 01:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1518516072.2029.1307496839117.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5611) C++ libraries do not build on Debian Lenny MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045743#comment-13045743 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-5611: ------------------------------------------ Uhm, the note should read: MAPREDUCE-1251 must also be applied after this patch. > C++ libraries do not build on Debian Lenny > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5611 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5611 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.3, 0.19.0, 0.19.1, 0.20.205.0 > Environment: Debian Lenny, 64 bit > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.20.2 > > Attachments: 0001-HADOOP-5611-Add-some-missing-includes-to-c-code-t.patch, HADOOP-5611-fixed.patch > > > The compilation of the C++ util and Hadoop Pipes code generates some errors about undefined functions. It appears there are just some missing includes that must not affect some other systems. Attaching a patch that fixes this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15986-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 04:54:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30514420D for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18419 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 04:54:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18379 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 04:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18369 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 04:54:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 04:54:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 04:54:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A51070FB for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Travis Crawford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1946943168.2233.1307508839030.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045778#comment-13045778 ] Travis Crawford commented on HADOOP-7359: ----------------------------------------- Would anyone object to allowing the HostsReader to trigger refreshNodes? That would let Hadoop scan for or be notified of cluster membership changes and automagically do the Right Thing. DETAILS Taking a step back, this change would be the most useful if your authoritative source for machine roles is stored Somewhere Else and you want Hadoop to integrate. The posted diff simply lets you pull the lists of included/excluded hosts from such a source, but does not activate the new lists - you still need to refreshNodes. Imagine you update the authoritative source with new/removed machines and want Hadoop to learn about the change (ZK watch, polling, etc.). It would be very handy for cluster membership & state changes to propagate without manual intervention as is needed today. Permitting HostsReader to call refreshNodes would accomplish this goal. PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION Introduce a "Refreshable" interface that both FSNamesystem and JobTracker implement, that only defines a refreshNodes method. HostsReader would have an initialize method that takes a Refreshable and users could choose to call refreshNodes. The current file-based cluster membership would continue to work exactly as it does today. Sort of a bigger change, but potentially very useful at larger sites. If there's general agreement this would be useful I'll post a diff. If not, I still think there's value in this change as it means no more copy/pasting lists of machines from the machine database :) > Pluggable interface for cluster membership > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7359 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Travis Crawford > Attachments: HADOOP-7359.diff > > > Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. > To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. > DETAILS: > Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. > The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. > Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. > Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class > Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15987-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 05:37:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48EDD4044 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44414 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 05:37:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44376 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 05:37:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44364 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 05:37:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:37:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:37:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FEB107B7A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:36:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <519231866.2295.1307511418922.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7356: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Todd committed this. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15988-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 05:43:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D07314095 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46440 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 05:43:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46391 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 05:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46374 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 05:43:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:43:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE895107CF6 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:42:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942644481.2302.1307511778842.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045795#comment-13045795 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------------- Hey Owen. As I commented [here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?focusedCommentId=13045116&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13045116] I left this open since it hasn't been committed to 0.20-security yet. Given the title I thought you might want to commit there before marking resolved. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15989-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 06:09:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC944066 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64814 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 06:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64725 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 06:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64698 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 06:09:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:09:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:09:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F159E107389 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:08:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <608244590.2388.1307513338985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-5647) TestJobHistory fails if /tmp/_logs is not writable to. Testcase should not depend on /tmp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-5647. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.20.203.0 This was committed by Sharad. > TestJobHistory fails if /tmp/_logs is not writable to. Testcase should not depend on /tmp > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5647 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5647 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5647.patch, yhadoop20-5647.patch > > > TestJobHistory sets /tmp as hadoop.job.history.user.location to check if the history file is created in that directory or not. If /tmp/_logs is already created by some other user, this test will fail because of not having write permission. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15990-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 08:08:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C71214F9C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56609 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:08:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56581 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:08:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56573 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 08:08:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:08:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:08:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ABB107CA9 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:07:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1574380138.2512.1307520478880.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15991-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 08:20:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F3744BAF for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84886 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:20:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84770 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:20:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84762 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 08:20:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:20:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:20:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057AD107251 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <939353310.2546.1307521199019.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Reuploading the patch.Thanks Daryn,you teach me so many things. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15992-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 08:34:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0916F4338 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2648 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:34:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2621 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 08:34:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:34:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:34:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3386107744 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:33:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1156619647.2561.1307522038796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045836#comment-13045836 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7348: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481783/HADOOP-7348.patch_2 against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1068 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1067 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/593//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/593//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/593//console This message is automatically generated. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15993-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 08:38:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F81D44BF for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10054 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:38:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10016 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 08:38:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10008 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 08:38:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:38:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:38:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8E11078F9 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:37:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <464986632.2564.1307522278899.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this to the branch. Thanks Tom. Will review/commit the trunk patch soon. > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15994-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 11:16:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894DB4AB3 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88306 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88268 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88257 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 11:16:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:16:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:16:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF15107ACC for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:15:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <150971706.2859.1307531758889.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045905#comment-13045905 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7323: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #713 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/713/]) HADOOP-7323. Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name. Contributed by Alejandro Abdelnur. tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1133125 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodecFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodec.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/CompressionCodecFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/DeflateCodec.java > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15995-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 15:43:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51DDD43F1 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19840 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:43:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19720 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:43:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19712 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 15:43:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:43:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:43:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223CB1075E4 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:42:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <218298693.3455.1307547779136.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046021#comment-13046021 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------------- Thanks for the suggestion Tom. The issue with GuardedBy is that it only takes only argument, which is a problem when you have multiple guarding a single method... any other ideas? > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15996-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:28:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8F1B4916 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14378 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14330 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14322 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:28:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:28:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:28:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6796F108CE1 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1528308285.3669.1307550479421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046051#comment-13046051 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7362: ----------------------------------- You're right that GuardedBy is not suitable for documenting locking order. How about introducing a LockingOrder annotation that takes an array of values? > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15997-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:38:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51184450C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45243 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45202 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45194 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:38:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:38:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:38:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDD71080DA for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1309266507.3683.1307551079057.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch Added test that metadata was actually set on the file. Re-based against trunk. The patches have been rebuilt, this time according to the guidelines here: http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html Please disregard the old ".diff" patches I supplied and only use these. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15998-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:40:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D56646AE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55163 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55127 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55119 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:40:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:40:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBADB1081BE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:39:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <906288486.3686.1307551198896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) This patch only allows the writing of metadata for a new file. You cannot arbitrarily add metadata for an existing file, nor can you read existing metadata. The major use-case for this is so that you can provide S3 with instructions about the file (e.g. Expires, Content-Disposition, etc.) so it's not actually as useless as it sounds. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15999-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:44:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27A1B486D for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65172 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:44:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65132 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65124 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:44:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:44:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:44:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8975108358 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:43:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1896254372.3707.1307551438817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046059#comment-13046059 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481835/0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/594//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16000-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:48:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7496B4173 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79324 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79262 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79254 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:48:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:48:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1369C1084B3 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:48:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1611216763.3722.1307551680076.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046061#comment-13046061 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Hi Nicholas. Sorry, our patch-bot is stupid and can only apply one patch at a time. Can you just upload a single combined "p0" level diff? > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16001-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:52:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 972FA43EA for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96069 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96046 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96031 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87AA1086EE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <564626948.3730.1307551918948.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7365: ---------------------------------- Attachment: c.patch This patch cleans up CHANGES.txt by: 1. Normalizing committers names to their apache login. 2. Fixing typos. 3. Limiting the line length to 79 chars. 4. Normalizing a few of the jira names for jiras that moved projects. 5. Creating virtual-jira NOJIRA- ids for 3 changes that didn't have jiras. 6. Adding jiras for hadoop 1.0. 7. Normalizing the format in the old releases to what we currently use. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16002-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:52:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 974E343EB for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96098 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96049 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96032 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B7C108701 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <543397601.3736.1307551919163.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) Owen, please review and commit to 0.20.20[4-5] branch. Thanks > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16003-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:52:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51B3B43F6 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96599 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96570 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96562 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:52:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:52:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6D21086F8 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <156801986.3733.1307551919047.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang reopened HADOOP-7356: ------------------------------- Reopen for not yet committed to 0.20.20x branch. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16004-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 16:54:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67E4544D2 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4889 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:54:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4846 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 16:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4838 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 16:54:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:54:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31151087D4 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <276097238.3743.1307552038992.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046067#comment-13046067 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7365: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481840/c.patch against trunk revision 1133125. -1 @author. The patch appears to contain 2 @author tags which the Hadoop community has agreed to not allow in code contributions. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/595//console This message is automatically generated. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16005-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:20:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B788456E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69718 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:20:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69673 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:20:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69663 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:20:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:20:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:20:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81E71084B1 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7367 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: native Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 Environment: System V Reporter: Allen Wittenauer getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16006-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:22:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01147462E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76895 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:22:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76867 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76859 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:22:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:22:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:22:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BC61085DF for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:21:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <700052073.3870.1307553718790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046090#comment-13046090 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------------ A few points: * The inclusion of this routine is preventing the native code from being compiled on platforms where it previously worked. * We have multiple ways to try to solve this: a) Rewrite the entire routine to remove the dependency on getgrouplist() b) Do auto-detection to use the built-in getgrouplist, otherwise use one we supply c) Use the current version when getgrouplist is present, otherwise use a completely different code stream that uses getgrent() etc. > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16007-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:24:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ABEC4705 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80238 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:24:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80211 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:24:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80202 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:24:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:24:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:24:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D4B1086F8 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <580905232.3875.1307553839139.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046092#comment-13046092 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7339: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Min, your results look good. Could you also modify {{org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest}} and run it to illustrate the performance improvement? > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16008-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:28:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A99BC4943 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88442 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:28:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88368 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:28:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88350 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:28:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:28:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:28:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63461088B2 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:27:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <17167584.3898.1307554078874.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046096#comment-13046096 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------------ It also appears this code doesn't work on OS X... which is... interesting. > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16009-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 17:59:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EA044D56 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74898 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:59:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74871 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 17:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74863 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 17:59:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:59:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:59:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3D108491 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:58:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1631715552.3947.1307555938855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799999999.69.1307444279323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7362) Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046109#comment-13046109 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7362: --------------------------------------- Yep, that is precisely what I just put into MR-279 for now. I think I'll change it to take String[] rather than Class[] ala GuardedBy. > Create a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7362 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7362 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > > It will be useful to have better developer docs via a Lock annotation to document locking (hierarchies) for methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16010-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 19:16:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9B54483 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6458 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 19:16:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6426 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 19:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6418 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 19:16:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:16:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:16:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6DB1091CE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <74308544.4114.1307560559301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-5759) IllegalArgumentException when CombineFileInputFormat is used as job InputFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joep Rottinghuis updated HADOOP-5759: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20.205.0 The "patch-5759-ydist.txt" patch should be applied to branch-0.20-security and the 0.20.205 branch. > IllegalArgumentException when CombineFileInputFormat is used as job InputFormat > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5759 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5759 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.20.2 > > Attachments: patch-5759-1.txt, patch-5759-2.txt, patch-5759-ydist.txt, patch-5759.txt > > > As per my understanding, CombineFileInputFormat is creating splits with rackname as split location. > When I use CombineFileInputFormat as the InputFormat for job, job initialization fails with following exception : > 2009-04-28 14:10:40,162 ERROR mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener (EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:run(83)) - Job initialization failed: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Network location name contains /: /default-rack > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NodeBase.set(NodeBase.java:76) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NodeBase.(NodeBase.java:57) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.addHostToNodeMapping(JobTracker.java:2342) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.resolveAndAddToTopology(JobTracker.java:2336) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.createCache(JobInProgress.java:344) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:441) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:81) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > When I changed CombineFileInputFormat to pass just rackname (without '/'), JT wrongly resolves the node as /default-rack/. > Solution is to pass hostnames holding the block(on the rack), instead of rackname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16011-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 19:46:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 276F04EA9 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55292 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 19:46:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55269 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 19:46:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55260 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 19:46:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:46:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:46:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57A8109E38 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1042204471.4341.1307562360805.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1043064090.64591.1307057267396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7356) RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7356: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed this to 0.20.204.0. I took out the support for running out of non-deployed developer directories. > RPM packages broke bin/hadoop script for hadoop 0.20.205 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7356 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Environment: Java 6, Redhat EL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7356-1.patch, HADOOP-7356-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7356.patch > > > hadoop-config.sh has been moved to libexec for binary package, but developers prefers to have hadoop-config.sh in bin. Hadoo shell scripts should be modified to support both scenarios. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16012-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 20:49:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AB464636 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65851 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65809 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65611 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:49:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC659109B6B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <741721305.4621.1307566138899.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046209#comment-13046209 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------------ >From the bit of playing I've done, getgrouplist on OS X doesn't update ngroups to have the total number of groups the user is in. Since the first call uses 0, it returns 0, which then dumps out of the rest of the loop. So a fix here needs to take that into consideration. (It may be worthwhile to just use sysconf(_POSIX_NGROUPS_MAX) for the first call so that getgrouplist mostly works on OS X and others with different semantics than the Linux version). > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16013-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 20:49:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EA93465E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66173 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66058 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66017 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:49:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F073109B71 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1533357109.4627.1307566139189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------- Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) Mac OS X was:System V > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) > Mac OS X > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16014-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:24:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54BDF434E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41314 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:24:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41277 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:24:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41267 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:24:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:24:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:24:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9D710999B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:23:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7368 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.23.0 In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. {code} public interface VersionProvider { String getJar(); String getPackage(); String getVersion(); String getRevision(); String getBranch(); String getDate(); String getUrl(); String getSourceChecksum(); } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16015-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:30:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D8194792 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51382 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51261 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51250 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:30:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:30:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:30:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EE3109B6B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:29:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <308395773.4851.1307568598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046238#comment-13046238 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7368: ------------------------------------- Nice idea. This will also be handy for things like codec plugins too! > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16016-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:36:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F4B34DFD for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66565 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:36:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66518 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:36:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66450 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:36:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:36:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:36:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0503B109B1A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:35:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1849782588.4878.1307568959017.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046244#comment-13046244 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7368: -------------------------------------------- In addition, would be possible to store this info in a properties file in the JAR instead calling a script to generate a class? Then, VersionProvider could be a class that reads a /version.properties' file to get all the values. > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16017-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:46:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F3D4A2B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79387 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79352 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79341 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C7B109F1A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7369 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Owen O'Malley Attachments: libexec.patch The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16018-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:46:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4092C4A8E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79819 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79778 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79480 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED67109F1E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1353320576.4894.1307569559057.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-7369: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Owen O'Malley > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16019-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:46:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43B434A9E for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79895 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79843 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79593 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4A9109F20 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1850374885.4896.1307569559116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7369: ---------------------------------- Attachment: libexec.patch This sets the permissions correctly. > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16020-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:46:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE9544ACD for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81652 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81620 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81600 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584A1109F2A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2096969188.4903.1307569559358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7369: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16021-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:46:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C79854D22 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82003 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81976 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81968 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:46:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:46:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E5C109F2C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1704868676.4905.1307569559410.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7369: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16022-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:48:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F078E4799 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82574 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:48:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82544 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82536 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:48:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:48:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:48:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75FB10901D for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:47:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1975607691.4907.1307569678813.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7369: ---------------------------------- Attachment: (was: libexec.patch) > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16023-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 21:54:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CF964D5C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94464 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:54:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94437 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 21:54:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94427 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 21:54:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:54:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D315A1092AD for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <954038211.4929.1307570038861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7369: ---------------------------------- Attachment: libexec.patch just the right fix > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16024-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 22:04:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BF24452F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4925 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:04:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4900 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4889 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 22:04:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:04:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3718F109673 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <375501769.4957.1307570639222.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046255#comment-13046255 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7368: --------------------------------- bq. In addition, would be possible to store this info in a properties file in the JAR instead calling a script to generate a class? Of course, the implementation of the VersionProvider interface is module dependent. The current saveVersion.sh script generates a package level annotation, which is actually simpler and less error prone then the reading version.properties. > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16025-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 22:06:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AAF045B5 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6716 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:06:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6648 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:06:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6640 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 22:06:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:06:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:06:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A9109731 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:05:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1273315475.4966.1307570758935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046256#comment-13046256 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7369: -------------------------------------------- +1 looks good > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16026-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 22:08:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40E7045F0 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7733 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:08:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7698 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7690 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 22:08:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:08:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:08:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90871097EA for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:07:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1659391110.4972.1307570878885.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046257#comment-13046257 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7368: --------------------------------- bq. less error prone then the reading version.properties. ugh, s/then the/than/ > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16027-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 8 22:40:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043024A03 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34909 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:40:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34877 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 22:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34869 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 22:40:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:40:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:40:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09CD109013 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:39:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1503522857.5067.1307572798850.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <182555283.4891.1307569558937.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7369) tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046264#comment-13046264 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7369: ----------------------------------- +1 looks good. Thanks Owen. > tarball has incorrect permissions for sbin and libexec > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: libexec.patch > > > The tarball currently doesn't have execute set on libexec/* or sbin/*. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16028-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 00:57:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9224CFE for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65775 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 00:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65749 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 00:57:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65656 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 00:57:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:57:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:57:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA5109226 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:56:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <522851026.5293.1307581019761.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7367.patch > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) > Mac OS X > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7367.patch > > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16029-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 01:01:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CF3E4554 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71025 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:01:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70987 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70979 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 01:01:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:01:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:01:24 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B1210932A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:01:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <188169949.5299.1307581264011.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Several things about this patch: * A check has been added to configure to look for a getgrouplist routine * If it is found, we use a getgrouplist routine that tries to do it all in one pass, based upon allocating POSIX_NGROUPS_MAX groups (up to 32) for the initial buffer. If the user has more than 32, we depend upon getgrouplist properly returning the number of groups for the user. (So this will only match the first 32 on Darwin) * If getgrouplist isn't there, we run through the entire groups db, looking for entries. Please note that at least Solaris requires _POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS defined for the 5 param version of get*_r. I'll cover that in a separate patch. > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) > Mac OS X > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7367.patch > > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16030-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 01:07:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F6244546 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75092 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75060 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75052 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 01:07:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:07:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:07:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89D41094A1 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:06:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <204142867.5331.1307581618949.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046296#comment-13046296 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7339: ---------------------------------- Hi Nicholas, Thank you for your feedback. Since right now BufferedChecksum is a non-public inner class, it should be taken out from DataChecksum as a public class like PureJavaCrc32. Could I change the testcase name from org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32 to org.apache.hadoop.util.TestChecksum? Cause it would become a testcase on 4 checksum implementations(or their combinations), jdk builtin CRC32, PureJavaCrc32, Buffered jdk builtin CRC32, Buffered PureJavaCrc32. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16031-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 01:17:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B8D4E79 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79463 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79427 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79409 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 01:17:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:17:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:17:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33F710970B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:16:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <389881229.5342.1307582218796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7339: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Min Zhou Let's focus on the code and minimize changes here so that it is easier to be reviewed. We may work on renaming/refactoring on a separated issue later. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Assignee: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16032-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 01:55:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79F54413A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3528 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:55:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3491 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 01:55:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3483 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 01:55:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:55:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAF1109F02 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1286432479.5378.1307584498843.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046303#comment-13046303 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7367: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481884/hadoop-7367.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/596//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/596//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/596//console This message is automatically generated. > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) > Mac OS X > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Attachments: hadoop-7367.patch > > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16033-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 07:54:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2383E665B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13661 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13628 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13605 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:54:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:54:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA49D10A87B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1204582022.5878.1307606038825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7370) Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem ------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7370 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7370 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Attachments: checksumfs-pread-0.20.txt Currently the implementation of positional read in ChecksumFileSystem is verify inefficient - it actually re-opens the underlying file and checksum file, then seeks and uses normal read. Instead, it can push down positional read directly to the underlying FS and verify checksum. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16034-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 07:54:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB8D7666E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13820 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13632 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13616 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 07:54:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:54:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:54:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4E610A87E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:53:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1094423604.5881.1307606038911.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1204582022.5878.1307606038825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7370) Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7370: -------------------------------- Attachment: checksumfs-pread-0.20.txt I was hacking on this against 0.20. It seems to have made a slight difference but I didn't do any real benchmarking. This would have to be updated to trunk and then benchmarked before commit. > Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7370 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7370 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: checksumfs-pread-0.20.txt > > > Currently the implementation of positional read in ChecksumFileSystem is verify inefficient - it actually re-opens the underlying file and checksum file, then seeks and uses normal read. Instead, it can push down positional read directly to the underlying FS and verify checksum. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16035-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 07:56:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE8AF672B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18743 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18716 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 07:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18708 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 07:56:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4D10A93D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:55:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <354858314.5883.1307606158798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1204582022.5878.1307606038825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7370) Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046378#comment-13046378 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7370: ------------------------------------- ah, also ignore the diff hunk related to readChunk -- part of HADOOP-3205 slipped in here > Optimize pread on ChecksumFileSystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7370 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7370 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: checksumfs-pread-0.20.txt > > > Currently the implementation of positional read in ChecksumFileSystem is verify inefficient - it actually re-opens the underlying file and checksum file, then seeks and uses normal read. Instead, it can push down positional read directly to the underlying FS and verify checksum. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16036-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 09:32:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 513096EAF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46693 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:32:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46654 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:32:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46645 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 09:32:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:32:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:32:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EFF10A2E0 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:31:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1683549881.6270.1307611919016.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: 7269-combined.patch I had a feeling this might be the case. Combined patch attached. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16037-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 09:34:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D0B36905 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53408 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53360 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53344 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 09:34:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:34:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:34:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDC910A3F8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2105698203.6280.1307612038975.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046426#comment-13046426 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481901/7269-combined.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/597//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16038-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 09:49:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46B862C2 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77379 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77267 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77259 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 09:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:49:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E82B10A945 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:48:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1836661052.6315.1307612939056.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: 7269-combined-proper.patch Totally stupid mistake there. I've switched to using Git for all my work on Apache projects and I'm still finding my feet with the workflow. This should be sorted now, please ignore all previous patches. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined-proper.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16039-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 10:05:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A21896C92 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12877 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 10:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12842 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 10:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12824 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 10:05:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:05:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:05:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF9A10AFDF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:04:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <463165810.6352.1307613899189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046444#comment-13046444 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481903/7269-combined-proper.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1069 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1067 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/598//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/598//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/598//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined-proper.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16040-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 11:28:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 004B46B71 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29714 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 11:28:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29664 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 11:28:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29535 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 11:28:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:28:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:28:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099DE10AD94 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:27:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mark Butler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <597117606.6541.1307618879036.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-3394) Distributed Lucene Index For Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Butler resolved HADOOP-3394. --------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem Closing this issue, it is no longer relevant. > Distributed Lucene Index For Hadoop > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3394 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3394 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Mark Butler > Priority: Minor > Attachments: dlucene080518.tar.gz > > > Here is the current prototype implementation of a distributed free text index using Hadoop based on Doug Cutting's design: > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lucene.apache.org/msg00338.html > There has also been some discussion about this on the Hadoop Wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/DistributedLucene > This work is not finished, so it is not intended for inclusion yet. For a description of the contribution and its current status see the report in > doc/index.html > in the attached archive that gives some details of the implementation. > This work was designed as a contrib contribution. However, as there are at least two other projects (Bailey and Katta) with similar goals it seemed a good idea to make this code available for discussion. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16041-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 14:06:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FB8D6C86 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99296 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:06:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99222 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99206 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 14:06:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:06:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:06:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1326F10A319 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:05:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1847389995.6877.1307628359075.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046550#comment-13046550 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7348: ------------------------------------- Please revert {{new CommandFormat(null, 2, 3, "nl");}} to omit the first parameter (null). The {{CommandFormat}} ctor that takes the unused parameter has been deprecated, so that's probably the -1 warning in the QA build. I'd also recommend moving the -nl to the front of the usage to be consistent with other commands. Ie. {{USAGE = "[-nl] "}}. Other than that, looks good! Just be sure to update the aforementioned tests in hdfs. Please link that jira to this one to make it easier to track. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16042-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 14:37:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C22C46142 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76213 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76174 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 14:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76166 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 14:37:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:37:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:37:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F19B10A627 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:36:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1358824149.7043.1307630219450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046579#comment-13046579 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7305: ------------------------------------- The patch doesn't work on OS X because the path is ${env.JAVA_HOME}/bundle/Classes/classes.jar (sorry if I mispoke earlier). Again though, classes.jar is already in the jdk's search path so it isn't strictly necessary. Another friend and I tested a fresh eclipse install on RHEL5 w/o tools.jar in the .classpath file. All we did is import the project and define ANT_HOME. It worked fine, so it calls into question the need for this patch. Are you sure you don't have a misconfiged environment? Are other people experiencing the problem? > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16043-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:07:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B17563B8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39206 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39173 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39165 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:07:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:07:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8DD10B595 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:06:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Anonymous (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <662227690.7168.1307632019171.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anonymous updated HADOOP-7297: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16044-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:15:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A8FB6793 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57705 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57671 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57658 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:15:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:15:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:15:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1170B10B8CB for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Christoph_B=C3=B6hm_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <309134864.7188.1307632499067.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christoph B=C3=B6hm updated HADOOP-7297: ----------------------------------- Description:=20 On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Ch= eckpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch= the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. I have removed this from the docs. was:On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.h= tml#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to = launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#= Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to laun= ch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16045-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:17:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A001B6F51 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65557 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:17:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65499 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:17:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65491 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:17:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:17:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:17:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547E210B9B5 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:17:01 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Christoph_B=C3=B6hm_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <318405068.7205.1307632621342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christoph B=C3=B6hm updated HADOOP-7297: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7297.patch I have removed this from the docs. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#= Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to laun= ch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16046-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:25:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B14696E38 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79579 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79542 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79534 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:25:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:25:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A9A10BDD6 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1678068314.7229.1307633099416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046612#comment-13046612 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7297: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481942/hadoop-7297.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/600//console This message is automatically generated. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16047-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:25:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E45E96E50 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79836 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79785 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79691 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:25:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:25:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:25:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ECC10BDD8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <808940268.7231.1307633099475.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046613#comment-13046613 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7278: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479155/HADOOP-7278.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/599//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/599//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/599//console This message is automatically generated. > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7278.patch > > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16048-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 744FF6732 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89367 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89341 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89333 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:31:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1317710B0BC for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Frank Conrad (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1437268561.7248.1307633459074.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Conrad updated HADOOP-1886: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-1886-1.diff add java doc > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16049-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9861D6740 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89627 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89581 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89573 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:31:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A8F10B0BF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Frank Conrad (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1342964020.7251.1307633459359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Conrad updated HADOOP-1886: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16050-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 15:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 642456E05 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26628 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26579 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 15:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26528 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 15:45:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:45:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:45:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378C10B61D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:44:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <235357240.7273.1307634298862.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046624#comment-13046624 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-1886: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481945/hadoop-1886-1.diff against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 2 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/601//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/601//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/601//console This message is automatically generated. > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16051-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 16:58:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B9C660E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20563 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:58:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20503 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 16:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20341 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 16:58:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:58:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:58:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4124C10B368 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Improve tarball distributions ----------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7371 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: "ant source" generates source release tarball. "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16052-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:11:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FEC1611F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42232 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:11:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42202 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:11:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42194 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:11:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:11:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:11:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175C810B858 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:11:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1920693641.7540.1307639461092.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046678#comment-13046678 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7371: -------------------------------------------- Yes, it makes senses. As part of the Mavenization HADOOP-6671 this would be trivial. Because of that, wouldn't make sense to wait till Mavenization is in place for this? > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16053-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:35:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E34F3650A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 793 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 766 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 758 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:35:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:35:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61D910B123 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1666235636.7586.1307640898807.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046686#comment-13046686 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7371: ----------------------------------- {quote}Because of that, wouldn't make sense to wait till Mavenization is in place for this?{quote} Yes, for trunk, it would. For 0.20.205 branch, maven work is not going to be back ported to this branch, and it looks like a needed improvement for 0.20.205 if there is plan to make future release from 0.20-security branch. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16054-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:37:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 409D7652F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1340 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:37:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1311 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1303 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:37:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:37:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:37:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF1D10B1C4 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <568169351.7591.1307641018965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046687#comment-13046687 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7371: -------------------------------------------- Got it, so this means this JIRA is not for trunk, right? > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16055-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:41:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 061426606 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8179 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:41:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8095 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8087 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:41:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:41:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:41:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D947410B3A0 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1368566129.7603.1307641258886.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <34642033.3863.1307553598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7367) getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7367: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20.203.0 Assignee: Allen Wittenauer Labels: regression (was: ) Adding the regression and 0.20.203 info, since this broke functionality that previously worked due to the compression codecs being in the same library. (Maybe libhadoop.so needs to get broken up?) > getgrouplist() in getGroup.c is not portable > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7367 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: System V (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX?) > Mac OS X > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Labels: regression > Attachments: hadoop-7367.patch > > > getGroupIDList uses getgrouplist() to fetch the groups for a user. Unfortunately, this routine is a BSD-specific call and is not present in most System V-based operating systems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16056-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:43:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC7B6642 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9942 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9915 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9907 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:43:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:43:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E824A10B45E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1944938259.7610.1307641378947.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046693#comment-13046693 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7371: ----------------------------------- If this can be done as part of HADOOP-6671, then please change this jira to 0.20.205. Otherwise, I will submit a patch for trunk and make another jira for 0.20.205. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16057-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:52:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 030AB6C95 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21826 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:52:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21791 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21783 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:52:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:52:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:52:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3DF10B95D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <961178887.7695.1307641919571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046701#comment-13046701 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7297: --------------------------------- Christoph, Thank you very much for contributing a patch fix! Since CN and BN nodes are both not present in this release, all documentation that refers to it around ought to be removed. Could you re-up a fresh patch with all relevant documentation and references removed? I'm unsure as to how it got in (perhaps a bad documentation cherry-pick while implementing the branch?) I think the QA failed to apply the patch because of Eclipse specific lines in it (as seen on top). Could you try with a simple {{svn diff}} or a {{git diff --no-prefix}} and re-upload? > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16060-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 641706EEF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34185 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34116 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34059 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A2610BC85 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1877453133.7770.1307642281728.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046710#comment-13046710 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7371: ------------------------------------- bq. Because of that, wouldn't make sense to wait till Mavenization is in place for this? Is common/hdfs/mr mavenization coming soon? We shouldn't block this work on a much larger project. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16058-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4D7F6F0B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33839 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33799 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33763 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2219010BC72 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1051028881.7757.1307642281135.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046708#comment-13046708 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7359: ---------------------------------------- bq. Would anyone object to allowing the HostsReader to trigger refreshNodes? That would let Hadoop scan for or be notified of cluster membership changes and automagically do the Right Thing. In the abstract I think this is a fine change to make. bq. Introduce a "Refreshable" interface that both FSNamesystem and JobTracker implement, that only defines a refreshNodes method. HostsReader would have an initialize method that takes a Refreshable and users could choose to call refreshNodes. I think the name "Refreshable" isn't the best. Seems a little too generic to me. How about something like "NodeListRefreshable" ? Also, the NN and the JT already implement the interfaces {{o.a.h.hdfs.protocol.ClientProtocol}} and {{o.a.h.mapred.AdminOperationsProtocol}}, respectively, both of which require implementation of a {{refreshNodes()}} method which happen to have the same signature. You could just make these interfaces extend your new interface and then you'd get the genericity you'd need without actually having to touch the NN or JT classes at all. bq. The current file-based cluster membership would continue to work exactly as it does today. That seems wise to me. This proposed change would also make it easy to potentially make the {{HostsFileReader}} do something like periodically check the mtime of the hosts files and re-read them automatically if they've changed and call {{refreshNodes()}} on the relevant {{NodeListRefreshable}}. > Pluggable interface for cluster membership > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7359 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Travis Crawford > Attachments: HADOOP-7359.diff > > > Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. > To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. > DETAILS: > Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. > The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. > Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. > Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class > Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16059-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:58:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 087EF6F15 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33925 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33888 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33803 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7292D10BC7F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <723671514.7764.1307642281465.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046709#comment-13046709 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7297: ------------------------------------- If the patch is against non-trunk, the QA Bot isn't smart enough to apply a patch. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16061-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 17:58:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D6056F3A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34282 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34244 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34111 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 17:58:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:58:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C220F10BC86 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1377580960.7771.1307642281791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7371: --------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.205.0 HADOOP-6671 (in trunk) will include options to generate source/binary/tar as described in this JIRA > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16062-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:02:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3164C6B30 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42134 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42074 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42011 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:02:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:02:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:02:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D7810BE79 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1842020300.7793.1307642520479.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046713#comment-13046713 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7371: -------------------------------------------- Rg Eli's comment: I'm wiring DEB/RPM in HADOOP-6671, after doing Mavenization of hadoop-common would be equivalent to Ant functionality. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16063-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:12:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781146823 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58178 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58145 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58137 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:12:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:12:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A5F10B267 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:11:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7372 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: documentation Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins Fix For: 0.20.3 Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. {noformat} Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased ... Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 {noformat} We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16064-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:12:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87DFA6869 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59033 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58995 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58911 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:12:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:12:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:12:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455A610B275 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:11:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1052252352.7844.1307643119281.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7372: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7372-1.patch Patch attached. > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16065-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:18:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECEF06835 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71195 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:18:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71165 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71157 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:18:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:18:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:18:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410E810B496 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <593050139.7874.1307643479263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046721#comment-13046721 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7371: ------------------------------------- But this jira pertains to all the projects (we release one tarball, not three), not just common. Ie we'd need the HDFS and MR side of HADOOP-6671 to use this here. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16066-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 18:32:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F6DA619C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99190 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99156 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 18:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99148 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 18:32:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:32:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:32:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A2610BA26 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:31:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <92564299.7945.1307644318851.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046726#comment-13046726 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7371: -------------------------------------------- Yes, we need HDFS & MR mavenized as well. Those would be done immediately after HADOOP-6671, first HDFS and then MR. Note that you'll be able to work on non-mavenized HDFS and MR using mavenized COMMON. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16067-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 19:41:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B81666E18 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29411 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29344 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29336 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 19:41:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:41:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:41:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA0110B7AD for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <617053419.8365.1307648458891.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7305: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7305-2011-06-09.patch I double checked and when I just import the project and do a refresh (F5) on the project then I get the error. I checked this on both # my regular CentOS 5.6 with the SUN JDK 1.6.0_22 and manually downloaded Eclipse # on a pristine Fedora 15 with the packaged OpenJDK and packaged Eclipse. Also note that I first checked in the mailing list to verify if anyone else has the same problem and Todd Lipcon immediately stepped forward. So yes, others experience the same issue. I've updated the patch to reflect the different path you mentioned. I hope it's right this time. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-06-09.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16068-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 19:55:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8334A6793 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64492 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64454 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 19:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64446 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 19:55:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:55:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:55:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F01010BCD8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:55:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1554767447.8408.1307649300058.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046774#comment-13046774 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7305: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481968/HADOOP-7305-2011-06-09.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/602//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/602//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/602//console This message is automatically generated. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-06-09.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16069-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 20:03:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 614846986 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80676 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:03:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80644 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80465 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 20:03:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:03:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:03:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D0910B108 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:02:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7373 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Owen O'Malley The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16070-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 20:05:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A00306EB1 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84568 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:05:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84533 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:05:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84518 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 20:05:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:05:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:05:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A1210B1C5 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1828424769.8463.1307649898822.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046782#comment-13046782 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7373: --------------------------------------- This also applies to the hadoop-daemons.sh when it is looking up slaves.sh > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16071-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 20:49:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 239666508 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47387 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47362 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47354 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD66610BFD9 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:48:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <979138249.8540.1307652538903.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7373: ---------------------------------- Attachment: c.patch This patch fixes hadoop-config.sh to use a different variable name, so that the other scripts don't get their environment clobbered. > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16072-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 20:49:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EB386518 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47684 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47649 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47634 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 20:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7ED10BFDE for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:48:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <161372953.8544.1307652539105.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-7373: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16073-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 20:58:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E0726799 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54789 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:58:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54759 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 20:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54751 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 20:58:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:58:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:58:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C233D10B2EF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 20:57:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <176931664.8562.1307653078792.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046799#comment-13046799 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7373: ----------------------------------- We can probably remove the entire block for 0.20.20x: {noformat} # convert relative path to absolute path bin=`dirname "$this"` script=`basename "$this"` bin=`cd "$bin"; pwd` this="$bin/$script" {noformat} > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16074-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 21:20:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1B73661A for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89227 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89183 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89175 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:20:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0516010BBA3 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:20:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "E. Sammer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <989466830.8625.1307654400017.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <710160053.68701.1307208347759.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7359) Pluggable interface for cluster membership MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046809#comment-13046809 ] E. Sammer commented on HADOOP-7359: ----------------------------------- I like the idea of this, but I would not necessarily attach it to the notion of files, explicitly. I would propose a ClusterTopology SPI-style interface and a ClusterTopologyListener interface for those interested in topology changes. Ideally, all clients (either internal to Hadoop daemons or external tools) would ask implementations of ClusterTopology for the list of hosts. Off the top of my head API: ClusterTopology <> getNodes() : Set refresh() getListeners() : Set addListener(ClusterTopologyListener) : boolean (wasAdded) removeListener(ClusterTopologyListener) : boolean (wasRemoved) ClusterTopologyListener <> onTopologyChange(ClusterTopology) And *then* have a single class that implements ClusterTopology. Configure the class two ways (no need to have an inheritance hierarchy). HostFileClusterTopology <> /* A private member with a base file name. The implementation automatically looks for baseFileName + .{include,exclude} */ baseFileName : File This, to me, seems like it would support the current file based membership but also things like an RDBMS or ZK. In the case of files and an RDBMS (and other non-event based systems) listeners wouldn't be notified of changes until a refresh() occurred. Alternatively, implementations could include a poller which automatically called refresh() when a change is detected or something like that. This is also easy to mock out and test. > Pluggable interface for cluster membership > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7359 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7359 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Travis Crawford > Attachments: HADOOP-7359.diff > > > Currently Hadoop uses local files to determine cluster membership. With HDFS for example, dfs.hosts and dfs.hosts.exclude are used. > To enable tighter integrations cluster membership should be an interface, with the current file-based functionality provided as the default implementation. The common case would be no functional change, however, sites could plug an alternative implementation in, such as pulling the machine lists from a machine database. > DETAILS: > Two machine lists, includes and excludes, are used to define cluster membership and state. HostsFileReader currently handles reading these lists from files, who's names are passed in by FSNamesystem for HDFS and JobTracker for MR. > The proposed change is adding a HostsReader interface to common, and changing HostsFileReader to an abstract class that functions the same as today. > Two new classes, DFSHostsFileReader and MRHostsFileReader, extend HostsFileReader and simply pass the appropriate file names in. These new classes are needed because config key names live outside common. > Two new conf keys, defaulting to the file-based readers, would be added to choose a different hosts reader: dfs.namenode.hosts.reader.class mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.reader.class > Comments/suggestions? I have most of this written already but would love some feedback on the general idea before posting the diff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16075-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 21:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8CDD6DEC for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50238 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50202 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50186 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 21:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:58:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0469A10BD27 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7374 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: scripts Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16076-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 22:00:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 852E86FF8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52318 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52287 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:00:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52272 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 22:00:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:00:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:00:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB53810BE3E for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:59:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1449184275.8775.1307656798895.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7374-1.patch Patch attached. Ran the hdfs and mr daemons and looked at the web UIs for sanity. > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16077-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 22:26:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8877C62AD for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87759 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:26:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87677 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:26:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87556 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 22:26:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:26:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:26:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0980310B940 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:25:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1340908608.8852.1307658359035.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046860#comment-13046860 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7373: ------------------------------------- I think you'll need these if you want the init scripts to run on boot. > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16078-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 22:32:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 986CB6E75 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91995 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:32:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91966 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:32:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91958 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 22:32:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:32:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140A810BB52 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:32:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1684609090.8865.1307658726079.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046863#comment-13046863 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7374: --------------------------------------- The thing to test is that the tools still run: distcp, har, etc. > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16079-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 22:42:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA2DD6AA8 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1680 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:42:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1637 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 22:42:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1624 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 22:42:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:42:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:42:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D45B10B10D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <697193324.8918.1307659319509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046881#comment-13046881 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7368: ------------------------------------------ If it was a file, I'd be worried about people just replacing the file in the jar to bypass compatibility checks. At least with the class, they have to do a bit more work. (I also have to admit that I like the fact that today it is somewhat non-obvious how this works, at least if one can take the "interesting" version information I've seen from various 3rd party Hadoop distributions as anecdotal evidence). > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16080-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 9 23:58:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0200F673B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76725 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 23:58:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76685 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 23:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76677 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 23:58:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:58:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:58:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBA610BA38 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:57:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <720092189.9164.1307663878839.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046926#comment-13046926 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7373: -------------------------------------------- +1 looks good, thanks Owen. > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16081-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 00:54:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73C4C6364 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18400 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18365 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18356 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:54:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1859F10C813 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2139110755.9253.1307667239096.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch I've set up a Jenkins job to build common artifacts using Maven: https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/. It's building the same artifacts as https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/, including documentation and native libraries, and reports for compiler warnings, tests, FindBugs, and Checkstyle. The only missing report is for Clover which needs adding to the Maven build. Currently two tests are failing (https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/8/) - I'm not sure why, as they pass for me locally using Maven, and on Hudson using Ant. I also tried a cross-project build using Maven for common and Ant for HDFS. I needed the attached patch to get the HDFS build to work - these are changes that are needed anyway that we were getting away with using Ivy. MapReduce will need similar changes. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16082-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 01:04:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45F236A7F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27725 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 01:04:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27700 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 01:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27692 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 01:04:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:04:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:04:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37D110CA3C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:03:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1978070403.9304.1307667838862.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046947#comment-13046947 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482008/HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/603//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16083-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:18:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0660E4F5B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71929 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:18:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71703 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71691 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:18:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:18:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:18:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4E910C139 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:17:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2080833602.9490.1307679478825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046986#comment-13046986 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7278: -------------------------------------------- So, the deployment has been working for at least one month now. Here one can see it in action: https://builds.apache.org//view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-cluster-deploy/ It also triggers on cluster tests (a downstream job from the above). Does anyone want to comment? > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7278.patch > > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16084-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:31:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5792140D5 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:31:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82592 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82579 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:31:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1880810C399 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1673967036.9509.1307680259096.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Dunning updated HADOOP-7020: -------------------------------- Attachment: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg Here is a potential powered by logo that was created using the standard small elephant logo. It would be very helpful for people trying to comply with the trademark guidelines to have an approved powered-by logo. This would make the powered-by/includes/is distinction much easier to make. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16085-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:33:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 958D74AED for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83228 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83073 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83065 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:33:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:33:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:33:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D27110C456 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:32:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1691766363.9529.1307680379050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: Frank Conrad Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Thanks for contributing Frank! > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16086-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:35:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B961F405A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86314 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86270 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86244 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE39210C4DB for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1983549182.9532.1307680498906.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-1886-2.patch Patch attached is a minor update to Frank's, fixes the two javadoc warnings and a couple minor things. > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16087-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:35:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E094065 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86548 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86281 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86245 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:35:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:35:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F231010C4DD for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <157768534.9534.1307680498988.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046991#comment-13046991 ] Ted Dunning commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------- The logo I just put up as a candidate uses a rastered version of the elephant. I can get a higher quality, scalable version make if this logo is accepted. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16088-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:41:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51B6140B4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88673 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:41:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88644 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88628 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:41:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:41:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:41:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA6110C64C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:40:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <821468188.9572.1307680859581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046992#comment-13046992 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7020: --------------------------------------- I think that looks reasonable. I would have preferred "Powered by Apache Hadoop," but this looks reasonable. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16089-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:55:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67169481D for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96275 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96224 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96189 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BC010C8E6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1650227280.9587.1307681698987.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7020: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg How about just the elephant with "Powered by Apache Hadoop"... something like hadooop-elephant-pb.jpeg but with a nicer font? I like how the Apache PB logo is similar to the main logo: http://www.apache.org/images/apache_pb.gif > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16090-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 04:55:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD677482A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96314 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96235 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96215 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 04:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:55:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAAB10C8E4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <654861694.9585.1307681698900.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046994#comment-13046994 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-1886: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482017/hadoop-1886-2.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/604//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/604//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/604//console This message is automatically generated. > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16091-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:01:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4566B4F8A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97919 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:01:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97872 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:01:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97862 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:01:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:01:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:01:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C09610CA50 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1697576487.9628.1307682059635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046997#comment-13046997 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7020: --------------------------------------- I think it is important that the two logos be easily distinguishable from each other. I like the silver circle. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16093-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:13:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 836FB4034 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15969 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15709 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15696 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD3310CC75 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1916181072.9639.1307682778901.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13046999#comment-13046999 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7374: ------------------------------------- Thanks Owen. I tested distcp and har. I also grepped the sources for the package names in tools.jar and that didn't turn up anything so I think the code is clear. The only dependency looks like Jasper to compile the jsps, but that's a build-time dependency. Attached (trivial) patch look good? > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16092-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:13:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C4404035 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15853 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15705 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15678 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:13:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:13:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA02210CC77 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1917018235.9641.1307682778955.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16094-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:25:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFDAC483B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31946 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:25:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31929 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31921 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:25:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:25:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:25:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BFC10CEBA for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <636610095.9647.1307683498855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-1886-2.patch Right patch this time. > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16095-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:27:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B359449B6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37658 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:27:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37533 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:27:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37523 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:27:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:27:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:27:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC2710CF7B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:26:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <180140321.9651.1307683618900.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047002#comment-13047002 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-1886: ------------------------------------- +1 to Frank's patch (w minor mods). > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16096-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:35:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C69D24065 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47359 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47232 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:35:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47219 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:35:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:35:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:35:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34F010C297 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2125273108.9689.1307684098796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047009#comment-13047009 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7374: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481985/hadoop-7374-1.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/605//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/605//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/605//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16097-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:37:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4FF540B0 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50097 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:37:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50009 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50001 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:37:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:37:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:37:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB0B10C31F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:36:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <449021261.9692.1307684218957.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047010#comment-13047010 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7372: ----------------------------------- +1 > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16098-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:41:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4CAC4114 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55502 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:41:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55349 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:41:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55334 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:41:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:41:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:41:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30B410C3CA for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:40:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1395327642.9694.1307684458795.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047011#comment-13047011 ] XieXianshan commented on HADOOP-7348: ------------------------------------- Thanks for your comments,i`ll renew this patch. But there`s no any auto-test for FsShell getmerge in hdfs.And there`s a note in the file testHDFSConf.xml: > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16099-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0FB444A1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62916 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62815 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62795 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:45:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:45:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:45:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29C710C4E4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:44:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1136068418.9701.1307684698990.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047012#comment-13047012 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-1886: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482019/hadoop-1886-2.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/606//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/606//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/606//console This message is automatically generated. > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16100-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:49:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6E24811 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64182 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:49:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64131 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64114 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:49:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71EB10C5F2 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:48:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <806461777.9709.1307684938943.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7348: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7348.patch > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16101-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:56:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1BD349F8 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75750 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75638 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75630 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FD310C80B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1196129422.9720.1307685359025.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7375: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16102-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:56:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 568744A03 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75947 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75900 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75892 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED66510C809 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <122605905.9718.1307685358969.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7375: --------------------------------- Attachment: resolvePath1.patch > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16103-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 05:56:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9347C4A0E for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76196 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75998 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75902 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:56:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D491710C806 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add resolvePath method to FileContext ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7375 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Fix For: 0.23.0 Attachments: resolvePath1.patch -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16104-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 06:04:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5A0840F7 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88009 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87909 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:04:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87899 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 06:04:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:04:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:04:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28D710CA16 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:03:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2035878363.9743.1307685838793.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047018#comment-13047018 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7348: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482022/HADOOP-7348.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/607//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/607//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/607//console This message is automatically generated. > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16105-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 06:08:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8937D4288 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90808 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:08:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90751 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90743 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 06:08:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:08:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:08:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C066310CB35 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:07:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1484893605.9748.1307686078784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047020#comment-13047020 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7375: ------------------------------------- AFS#getFileStatus is now called instead of FileContext#getFileStatus, which means fixRelativePart is no longer used to make the path absolute in FileContext relative to the working dir before passing the path to AFS right? Nit: lines 568 and 2231 need indenting. Otherwise looks great. > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16106-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 06:10:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99CF14327 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92426 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:10:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92375 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92344 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 06:10:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:10:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:10:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B819F10CC26 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:09:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <93089364.9770.1307686199750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047022#comment-13047022 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7020: -------------------------------------------- Silver circle is very classy. I like it as well. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16107-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 06:15:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EB18460B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97892 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:15:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97746 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:15:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97736 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 06:15:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:15:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:15:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F8110CD38 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:14:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <98273032.9774.1307686498795.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047024#comment-13047024 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7375: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482023/resolvePath1.patch against trunk revision 1133125. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/608//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/608//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/608//console This message is automatically generated. > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16108-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 06:25:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7EDB4CC1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3475 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3431 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 06:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3415 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 06:25:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:25:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:25:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD83AB7014 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <609792.9797.1307687099707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047026#comment-13047026 ] Ted Dunning commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------- Based on the OOM and KB feedback, I think we will be moving forward with the circle logo. We recognize that this is not yet an official logo, but we really need to be able to make the distinction. We can update if there is consensus on another option. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16109-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 07:01:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A6284451 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30829 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:01:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30722 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30384 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 07:01:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:01:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:01:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E29B7F32 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1266637257.9881.1307689259168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047040#comment-13047040 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7372: ------------------------------------- On 2nd thought, wouldn't it make sense to do this by reverting the "Preparing for release 0.20.3" change? Looks like the build.xml and releasenotes.html needs to be edited to. > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16110-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 07:13:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56F2244E4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47706 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:13:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47569 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:13:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47557 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 07:13:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:13:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:13:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D2010C3DC for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:12:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1252719079.9904.1307689978856.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7376) DataTransfer Protocol using protobufs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 DataTransfer Protocol using protobufs ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7376 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7376 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon We've been talking about this for a long time... would be nice to use something like protobufs or Thrift for some of our wire protocols. I knocked together a prototype of DataTransferProtocol on top of proto bufs that seems to work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16111-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 07:15:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C4734606 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51398 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51371 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51363 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 07:15:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:15:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:15:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3DB10C5EE for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:14:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1986610418.9906.1307690098829.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1252719079.9904.1307689978856.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7376) DataTransfer Protocol using protobufs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7376: -------------------------------- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Sub-task) Parent: (was: HADOOP-7347) > DataTransfer Protocol using protobufs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7376 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7376 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > We've been talking about this for a long time... would be nice to use something like protobufs or Thrift for some of our wire protocols. > I knocked together a prototype of DataTransferProtocol on top of proto bufs that seems to work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16112-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 07:45:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BCAB4DEF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97240 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97212 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 07:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97197 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 07:45:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:45:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:45:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5DB10C1A5 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:44:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1698547793.10005.1307691898895.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks Frank! > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16113-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 08:07:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D98F4A0A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19013 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 08:07:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18980 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 08:07:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18950 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 08:07:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:07:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:07:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E344310C8DA for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:06:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <662453607.10028.1307693218927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047065#comment-13047065 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #646 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/646/]) HADOOP-1886. Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem. Contributed by Frank Conrad eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134218 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.java > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16114-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 09:07:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 310B84E0F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99713 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 09:07:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99670 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 09:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99662 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 09:07:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:07:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:07:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F085A10CFAF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:06:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1360911936.10121.1307696818981.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047087#comment-13047087 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #11 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/11/]) HADOOP-1886. Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem. Contributed by Frank Conrad eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134218 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.java > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16115-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 11:15:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 226424C72 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16569 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 11:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16542 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 11:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16534 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 11:15:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:15:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:15:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE1B10CE6C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:14:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2087964163.10306.1307704498827.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1886) Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047139#comment-13047139 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-1886: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #715 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/715/]) HADOOP-1886. Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem. Contributed by Frank Conrad eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134218 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.java > Undocumented parameters in FilesSystem > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1886 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1886 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Frank Conrad > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-1886-1.diff, hadoop-1886-2.patch, hadoop-1886-2.patch > > > Multiple create methods in public FileSystem class lack documentation for the following 2 parameters. > - long blockSize, > - Progressable progress -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16116-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 13:47:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1918B4E69 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75563 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 13:47:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75533 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 13:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75525 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 13:47:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:47:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:47:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F2210D475 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:46:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1382834788.10633.1307713618889.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047186#comment-13047186 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7348: ------------------------------------- +1 Very nice! It's too bad there aren't hdfs tests since it wouldn't be hard to do... Would you mind filing a jira for the need to add tests so we don't forget it needs to be done? > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16117-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 16:48:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343F94926 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64159 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64115 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64106 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 16:48:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:48:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:48:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9214F10D662 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:47:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lohit Vijayarenu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1705211241.11147.1307724479595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047283#comment-13047283 ] Lohit Vijayarenu commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------------ Silver circle logo is very nice. Would love to have it as laptop sticker or t-shirt logo :) > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16118-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 17:18:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0482B4E08 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23382 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:18:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23334 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:18:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23189 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 17:18:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:18:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:18:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E06810DFD7 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:17:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1451428120.11231.1307726279250.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1269276399.4788.1307568238896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7368) Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047301#comment-13047301 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7368: -------------------------------------------- IMO, the current mechanism brings obscurity/complexity to the build process. And if you open a JAR, replace a file, and reJAR, then you know you are doing something funny. (And you could do that with the annotation class as well) > Mechanism for providing version info of hadoop jars > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7368 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7368 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In 0.20.x, only one jar (hadoop-core-*.jar) really matters. The o.a.h.util.VersionInfo combined with saveVersion.sh script (generating a package level annotation) served us well. For 0.23+, due to the project split and modularization of mapreduce (currently in MR-279), a lot more essential hadoop jars are created. The potential of mixing up the jars is significantly increased as well. We need a simple way to list the version info (version, branch, source checksum etc.) for all the jars involved. This is essential for QE and tracking down various issues. > I propose that we use a VersionProvider interface (similar to the current VersionInfo util class) and ServiceLoader to enumerate the version providers in the jars. > {code} > public interface VersionProvider { > String getJar(); > String getPackage(); > String getVersion(); > String getRevision(); > String getBranch(); > String getDate(); > String getUrl(); > String getSourceChecksum(); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16119-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 17:34:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52E844107 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46052 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:34:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46021 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:34:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46012 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 17:34:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:34:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:34:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A4510D624 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1510144945.11296.1307727239159.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7365: ---------------------------------- Attachment: changes.patch This fixes up some more of the wrong jiras that showed up when i looked for duplicates. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch, changes.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16120-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 17:48:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CC204B80 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65055 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:48:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65012 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64977 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 17:48:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:48:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:48:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C673510DC72 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:47:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1632804688.11352.1307728079809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047321#comment-13047321 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7375: ----------------------------------------- +1 with Eli's comments addressed. > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16121-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 17:54:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F17BE4E34 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82808 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:54:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82769 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 17:54:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82760 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 17:54:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:54:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:54:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F23E10D00B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1072202577.11404.1307728439517.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047330#comment-13047330 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7365: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482079/changes.patch against trunk revision 1134218. -1 @author. The patch appears to contain 2 @author tags which the Hadoop community has agreed to not allow in code contributions. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/609//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/609//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/609//console This message is automatically generated. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch, changes.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16122-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 18:39:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A05294705 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79974 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:39:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79924 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 18:39:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79814 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 18:39:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:39:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:39:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E169D10D35F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:38:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1196787142.11570.1307731138920.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2129468871.8460.1307649778954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7373) Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7373. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 It looks like trunk didn't have the problem. > Tarball deployment doesn't work with {start,stop}-{dfs,mapred} > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7373 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7373 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: c.patch > > > The hadoop-config.sh overrides the variable "bin", which makes the scripts use libexec for hadoop-daemon(s). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16123-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 19:37:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 418B64FAC for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81199 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81126 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:37:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80966 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 19:37:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:37:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:37:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD4510D6D8 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:36:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16124-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 19:45:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D7D6454D for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5553 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5509 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5501 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58A010D99E for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ian Holsman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <934434933.11751.1307735099871.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047394#comment-13047394 ] Ian Holsman commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- the asf-authorization patch was committed in 790732. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16125-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 19:45:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 441F74596 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5844 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5805 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5797 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 19:45:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:45:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F0210D9A1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <538004229.11753.1307735099951.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047395#comment-13047395 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------------ Is the artistic intent to suggest a mouse/gerbil/small rodent wheel? > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16126-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 19:55:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 412DD4C02 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25928 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25869 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 19:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25796 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 19:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF0210DDCF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <301573562.11798.1307735698975.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047402#comment-13047402 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7371: -------------------------------------------- Eric, the source TAR, should be the source ready to build, or ...? > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16127-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:04:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE5214581 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49371 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49330 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49318 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:04:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48E810D24D for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1084885206.11860.1307736239736.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7377: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7377.patch Quick cheap way to get the NAME field despite the visibility of the class and/or field. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16128-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:06:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5342A4685 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54490 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:06:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54464 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:06:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54456 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:06:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:06:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:06:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D354810D357 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:05:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1021369500.11862.1307736358852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7377: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) No tests included because it fixes tests in hdfs. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16129-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:19:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AD3F4E31 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83208 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:19:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83176 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:19:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83163 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:19:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:19:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:19:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD60510D8A9 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:18:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2088815756.11935.1307737138837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Dunning updated HADOOP-7020: -------------------------------- Attachment: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png Here is a version with "Powered by Apache Hadoop". That fits surprisingly well. Again, it would be good to get some clarity here. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16130-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:25:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4538042EC for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91954 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91879 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91865 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADC110DA53 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:24:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1258610207.11959.1307737498893.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047426#comment-13047426 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7377: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482092/HADOOP-7377.patch against trunk revision 1134218. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/610//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/610//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/610//console This message is automatically generated. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16131-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:25:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEECE4322 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92309 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92274 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92266 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:25:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:25:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FB110DA76 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <414687843.11984.1307737499729.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047427#comment-13047427 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- A couple of other things I noticed: We need to use a custom doclet for Javadoc (to exclude private classes). Something like {code} org.apache.hadoop.classification.tools.ExcludePrivateAnnotationsStandardDoclet org.apache.hadoop hadoop-common 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT true {code} The releaseaudit target equivalent is needed in Maven. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16132-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:27:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88314441B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94671 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:27:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94473 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:27:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94450 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:27:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:27:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:27:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1398710DBE1 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:27:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <24909417.11996.1307737620076.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047428#comment-13047428 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7371: ----------------------------------- Alejandro, source tarball should be the source ready to build without hadoop jar files. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16133-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 20:35:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 265034B83 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7468 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:35:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7435 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 20:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7422 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 20:35:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:35:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DF510DED6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <669595667.12010.1307738098872.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047430#comment-13047430 ] Ted Dunning commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------- Allen, I think that the artistic intent was just tie the words and elephant together. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16134-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 21:10:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B1A3456C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83544 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 21:10:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83509 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 21:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83501 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 21:10:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:10:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:10:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEF610DE67 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:09:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2009244920.12207.1307740198831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047457#comment-13047457 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7365: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the change. Could you please add some unit tests ;-) > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch, changes.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16135-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 21:20:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C8444DD5 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 838 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 21:20:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 810 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 21:20:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 799 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 21:20:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:20:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:20:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C831C10D1E4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:19:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1294483310.12227.1307740798816.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <714460080.1372.1307482018863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7365) Clean up CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047461#comment-13047461 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7365: ------------------------------------------------ > ... Could you please add some unit tests ... There are already 2 new or modified tests. :) bq. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. > Clean up CHANGES.txt > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7365 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7365 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c.patch, c.patch, changes.patch > > > CHANGES.txt has some typos and standardizing the formatting. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16136-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 22:22:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F6534B1F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2384 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:22:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2355 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2347 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 22:22:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:22:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:22:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBAC10DAE5 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1780011712.12448.1307744519122.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7378) hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7378 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp In a nutshell, ls needs the ability to list a directory but not its contents. W/o -d, it is impossible to list the root directory's owner, permissions, etc. See the original hdfs bug for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16137-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 22:35:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0D24428F for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17009 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16970 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16962 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 22:35:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:35:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DAE10DE55 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:34:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1986319569.12481.1307745298823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1780011712.12448.1307744519122.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7378) hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7378: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7378.patch > hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7378 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7378.patch > > > In a nutshell, ls needs the ability to list a directory but not its contents. W/o -d, it is impossible to list the root directory's owner, permissions, etc. See the original hdfs bug for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16138-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 22:37:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26B3D4423 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18998 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:37:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18957 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18949 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 22:37:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:37:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:37:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0080410DFC4 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:36:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <75615708.12485.1307745418998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1780011712.12448.1307744519122.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7378) hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7378: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7378 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7378.patch > > > In a nutshell, ls needs the ability to list a directory but not its contents. W/o -d, it is impossible to list the root directory's owner, permissions, etc. See the original hdfs bug for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16139-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 22:55:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 459804D40 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32927 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32897 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 22:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32888 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 22:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:55:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7B010E289 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <555352666.12625.1307746498838.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1780011712.12448.1307744519122.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7378) hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047643#comment-13047643 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7378: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482108/HADOOP-7378.patch against trunk revision 1134218. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/611//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/611//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/611//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop dfs -ls : Do not expand directories (was HDFS-1475) > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7378 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7378 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7378.patch > > > In a nutshell, ls needs the ability to list a directory but not its contents. W/o -d, it is impossible to list the root directory's owner, permissions, etc. See the original hdfs bug for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16140-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 10 23:15:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 689754778 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55218 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 23:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55187 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2011 23:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55175 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2011 23:15:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:15:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:15:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D4710E406 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:14:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable -------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7379 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io, ipc Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.23.0 Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16141-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:21:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D57544564 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20589 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20542 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20527 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7866210E458 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2094690652.12980.1307751660489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7020: -------------------------------- Attachment: powered_by_hadoop.jpg Here's a draft from Alison Wong who designed the Apache Whirr logo. It needs to be updated to say "Apache Hadoop" and perhaps make the elephant yellow. If people like the overall look she'll iterate on the design. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16142-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:21:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0684A456B for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20775 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20545 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20528 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CD210E459 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:21:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1766362893.12981.1307751660532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047799#comment-13047799 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------- File is powered_by_hadoop.jpg > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16143-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 571D64110 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30401 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30375 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30367 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:31:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:31:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:31:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4610E65B for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:30:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1903769667.13020.1307752258856.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7379.txt Here's a patch which does the following: - protobufs can be serialized by ObjectWritable. They are length-prefixed with a varint and then written on the wire - adds test for the writable format itself - adds a call in TestIPC that uses a protobuf as a parameter and response I see one spot for an optimization by removing a buffer copy on the read side, but I'd like to leave that for later. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16144-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:33:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 149494CAD for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31793 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31762 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:33:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31754 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:33:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:33:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:33:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65DF10E6A5 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:32:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <248224096.13022.1307752378874.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16145-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:54:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C59C5499D for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42022 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41982 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41974 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:54:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:54:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:54:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6384B10EB0E for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1440012191.13063.1307753639404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047810#comment-13047810 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7379: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482124/hadoop-7379.txt against trunk revision 1134218. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/612//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/612//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/612//console This message is automatically generated. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16146-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 00:58:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E16E54A21 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48412 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:58:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48382 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 00:58:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48374 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 00:58:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:58:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:58:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7462510EB9F for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1752073012.13070.1307753879473.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047812#comment-13047812 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7379: --------------------------------- Todd, what PEDs are you taking? I mean, you're on a roll :) ProtoUtil.readRawVarint32 is a new implementation vint32 decoding for DataInput. It needs test coverage for 1 to 5 bytes. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16147-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 02:48:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43F806D37 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18276 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 02:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18064 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 02:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18056 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 02:48:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:48:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:48:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06B210EB66 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:47:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1625774222.13162.1307760478784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047826#comment-13047826 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7375: -------------------------------------- >AFS#getFileStatus is now called instead of FileContext#getFileStatus, which means >fixRelativePart is no longer used to make the path absolute in FileContext relative to the >working dir before passing the path to AFS right? No sure if your question is with regards to all the methods in FileContext or the single method I changed. I have changed the FileContext#resolve to call AFS#resolvePath(p) which currently calls AFS#getFileStatus(p) > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16148-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 03:28:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E37C86A47 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35823 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 03:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34370 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 03:28:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34360 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 03:28:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:28:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:28:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63BA10E05C for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:27:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1903916273.13177.1307762878808.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047829#comment-13047829 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7379: ------------------------------------- bq. Todd, what PEDs are you taking? I mean, you're on a roll I recently learned how to make pretty good cappuccinos from our machine here at the office. No joke, I'm considering a part time job at Blue Bottle. Thanks :) bq. ProtoUtil.readRawVarint32 is a new implementation vint32 decoding for DataInput. It needs test coverage for 1 to 5 bytes. I actually copy-pasted it from protobufs (compatible license). I can probably copy-paste some of their unit tests, too.. I'll look around. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16149-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 03:48:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D477E6447 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42166 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 03:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42132 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 03:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42116 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 03:48:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:48:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:48:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB0810E324 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:47:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Common portion of HDFS-1973 --------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7380 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers Fix For: 0.23.0 Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16150-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 04:22:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BBB46139 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65065 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:22:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64858 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:22:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63749 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 04:22:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:22:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:22:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C1410E893 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FindBugs OutOfMemoryError ------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7381 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis Priority: Minor When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). This is the error I get: findbugs: [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task [findbugs] Running FindBugs... [findbugs] Out of memory [findbugs] Total memory: 477M [findbugs] free memory: 62M [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar ... [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) ...15 more [findbugs] Java Result: 1 [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml BUILD FAILED /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) ... 15 more Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) ... 20 more Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) ... 21 more --------- etc.etc. Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16151-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 04:24:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA4986182 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65676 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65644 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65634 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 04:24:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:24:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:24:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678F710E8E7 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1849702119.13214.1307766239420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047835#comment-13047835 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7381: ------------------------------------------ Even though this is hardcoded on trunk as well, it is less likely to be a problem due to the project split. After the split each of the three projects will have a much smaller set of files to parse during the FindBugs targets. > FindBugs OutOfMemoryError > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7381 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis > Priority: Minor > > When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. > The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. > We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). > This is the error I get: > findbugs: > [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs > [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task > [findbugs] Running FindBugs... > [findbugs] Out of memory > [findbugs] Total memory: 477M > [findbugs] free memory: 62M > [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar > ... > [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) > ...15 more > [findbugs] Java Result: 1 > [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html > [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl > [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. > [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > BUILD FAILED > /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) > at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > ... 15 more > Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) > ... 20 more > Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) > ... 21 more > --------- > etc.etc. > Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds > Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... > CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. > [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE > [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16152-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 04:30:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2128A635F for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67209 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:30:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67176 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67166 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 04:30:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:30:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:30:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FBF10E9E3 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:29:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <80655891.13222.1307766598815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7379.txt Added a simple unit test that encodes ints with CodedOutputStream and then decodes them with the function in ProtoUtil > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16153-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 04:40:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B5DD66D5 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69656 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69621 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69604 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 04:40:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:40:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:40:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53E510EB58 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:39:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "shanlin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <793051693.13228.1307767198870.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7382) hadoop 0.20.203.0 Eclipse Plugin does not work with Eclipse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hadoop 0.20.203.0 Eclipse Plugin does not work with Eclipse ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7382 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7382 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: contrib/eclipse-plugin Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 Environment: window 7 ; eclipse3.6-rc2 Reporter: shanlin Priority: Blocker hadoop 0.20.203.0 Eclipse Plugin does not work with Eclipse,while adding DFS Locations,Advance parameters didin't hava a option hadoop.job.ugi -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16154-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 04:46:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D00D96FA9 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75203 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:46:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75171 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 04:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75158 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 04:46:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:46:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:46:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E402810EC3F for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:45:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <774305907.13237.1307767558930.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047838#comment-13047838 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7379: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482130/hadoop-7379.txt against trunk revision 1134218. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/613//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/613//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/613//console This message is automatically generated. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16155-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 05:06:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FC3D62A7 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82815 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82804 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0317D10EF57 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <8326607.13252.1307768759009.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joep Rottinghuis updated HADOOP-7381: ------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7381.patch Adjusted build file to make FindBugs jvmargs a ant property with the same default value, but this one can be set from outside build.xml > FindBugs OutOfMemoryError > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7381 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7381.patch > > > When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. > The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. > We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). > This is the error I get: > findbugs: > [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs > [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task > [findbugs] Running FindBugs... > [findbugs] Out of memory > [findbugs] Total memory: 477M > [findbugs] free memory: 62M > [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar > ... > [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) > ...15 more > [findbugs] Java Result: 1 > [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html > [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl > [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. > [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > BUILD FAILED > /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) > at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > ... 15 more > Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) > ... 20 more > Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) > ... 21 more > --------- > etc.etc. > Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds > Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... > CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. > [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE > [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16156-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 05:06:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CC5662B6 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83106 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83041 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82813 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:06:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A70D10EF58 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <358846794.13253.1307768759039.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047843#comment-13047843 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7381: ------------------------------------------ Once patch is applied and I add the following to my build.properties, the error disappears: # Give FindBugs some more memory due to the large # classes and effort=max parameter. findbugs.jvmargs=-Xmx1024M > FindBugs OutOfMemoryError > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7381 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7381.patch > > > When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. > The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. > We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). > This is the error I get: > findbugs: > [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs > [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task > [findbugs] Running FindBugs... > [findbugs] Out of memory > [findbugs] Total memory: 477M > [findbugs] free memory: 62M > [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar > ... > [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) > ...15 more > [findbugs] Java Result: 1 > [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html > [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl > [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. > [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > BUILD FAILED > /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) > at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > ... 15 more > Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) > ... 20 more > Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) > ... 21 more > --------- > etc.etc. > Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds > Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... > CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. > [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE > [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16157-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 06:37:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 015AE6627 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23450 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 06:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22764 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 06:36:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22691 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 06:36:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:36:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA7210EBA7 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:36:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <808994966.13302.1307774162314.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047847#comment-13047847 ] Ted Dunning commented on HADOOP-7020: ------------------------------------- Eli, That is certainly a powerful looking powered-by logo. It doesn't fit the stylistic heritage of a playful logo based on a children's toy, though. My own feeling is that it would be good to have the option of maintaining the continuity to make clear that software that is powered by Hadoop owes its patrinomy to Hadoop. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16158-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 09:04:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBEDA618E for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1654 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:04:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1523 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:04:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1509 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 09:04:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:04:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:04:18 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB8310E616 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:03:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <834230839.13569.1307783038839.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7020: ----------------------------------- Attachment: powered-by-proposal.jpg Here's a proposal I'd like to put forth. I tried to incorporate as much as possible of the feedback people have thus far provided. Specifically, it is somewhat visually distinct from the project logo while retaining obvious association, and incorporates the Apache feather. I also think it works well with the tradition of wearing different hats at Apache. If there were such a thing as an actual "Apache hat" I imagine it would be a headband with a single feather. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16159-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 09:16:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE05F6724 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9604 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:16:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9576 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:16:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9567 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 09:16:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:16:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:16:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C118C10E889 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <821134800.13614.1307783759787.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047870#comment-13047870 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7020: ---------------------------------------- Also, does anyone know what font is used for the word "hadoop" in the project logo? I haven't found a good way to figure that out. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16160-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 09:24:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71A326877 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12665 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:24:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12630 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 09:24:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12622 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 09:24:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:24 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323C710E9D5 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1867765000.13623.1307784243202.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047872#comment-13047872 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-7379: --------------------------------------- Woah, tlipcon, slow down man! :) In all seriousness... great stuff. What will it take to get ipc.Server to understand PB rather than Writable? > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16161-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 18:31:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46BB86B8B for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62056 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 18:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62026 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 18:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62013 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 18:31:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:31:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:31:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128C9110194 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bochun Bai (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2012445929.14160.1307817059072.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6424) Port FsShell to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bochun Bai updated HADOOP-6424: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6424.patch FsShell changed a lot these two years. More FileSystem should be removed from org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell package. > Port FsShell to FileContext > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: John George > Attachments: HADOOP-6424.patch, HADOOP-6424.patch > > > FsShell currently uses FileSystem, needs to be moved over to FileContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16162-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 22:12:23 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 692196A64 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39461 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 22:12:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39433 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 22:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39425 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 22:12:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:12:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:12:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FE04141F7 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:12:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2132487624.72.1307830320095.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047991#comment-13047991 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. Summary ------- Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 Diffs ----- src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff Testing ------- Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. Thanks, Harsh > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16163-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 11 22:20:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EAB56163 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46572 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46535 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46524 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:20:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7553E414350 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1978328307.86.1307830798477.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Release Note: (was: Improve SerializationFactory's handling of cases where a serializer isn't found given a class.) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Please review patch at https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16164-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 01:24:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D78D669D2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41390 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:24:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41355 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41347 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 01:24:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:24:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:24:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1174145B9 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:23:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912848852.86.1307841831713.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048193#comment-13048193 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7375: ------------------------------------- Ah, never mind, I thought it was previously calling FC#getFileStatus. +1 feel free to address the nits directly in the commit since it's just indentation. > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16165-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 01:38:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01ACB6F74 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48972 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48943 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48935 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 01:38:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:38:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B024147E3 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:37:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1019680227.96.1307842671601.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7375: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks Sanjay. > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16166-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 01:56:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D432D649E for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54051 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:56:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53940 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 01:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53932 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 01:56:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:56:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:56:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A57414A47 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 01:55:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2052603422.104.1307843751667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048196#comment-13048196 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7375: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #647 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/647/]) HADOOP-7375. Add resolvePath method to FileContext. Contributed by Sanjay Radia eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134854 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFsBaseTest.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileContext.java > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16167-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 02:27:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6338A496D for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63831 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 02:27:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63803 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 02:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63795 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 02:27:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:27:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:27:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2DE414E87 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:26:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <528013048.117.1307845613709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048199#comment-13048199 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review805 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ship it! Looks good to me. Can you upload this rev of the patch to the JIRA so the QA Bot runs on it? - Todd On 2011-06-11 22:10:17, Harsh Chouraria wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-06-11 22:10:17) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. bq. bq. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. bq. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Harsh bq. bq. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16168-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:09:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A00EA4DF2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82753 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:09:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82698 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:09:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82681 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:09:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:09:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:09:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51617414500 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:08:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1695397989.143.1307848133330.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon moved HDFS-2068 to HADOOP-7383: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: build) build Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Key: HADOOP-7383 (was: HDFS-2068) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16169-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:15:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 513AC4F0E for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84422 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:15:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84312 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84304 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:15:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:15:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:15:15 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB5A4146E4 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:14:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <63164167.161.1307848495175.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7383.txt Tested this patch with resolvers=internal, it fixed MR build for me. > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16170-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:19:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFBBC40E1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85510 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85280 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85270 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA85041481C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:18:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <143581848.172.1307848731761.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16171-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:19:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C86340F7 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85531 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85289 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85279 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:19:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:19:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5D641481A for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:18:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <824981297.170.1307848731649.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048210#comment-13048210 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7383: ------------------------------------- +1 (rationale for 2.4.0a btw is that 2.4.1 isn't in maven yet, should be there soon) > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16172-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:32:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3136645EC for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91786 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91750 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91739 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:32:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFC0414996 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:31:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <821277200.176.1307849511574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this (before the Hudson results are in because in unbreaks the build). Thanks Todd! > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16173-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:36:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98FD24C13 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92670 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92503 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92494 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:36:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:36:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:36:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CC6414A60 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:35:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <75678170.180.1307849751798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048212#comment-13048212 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7383: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482271/hadoop-7383.txt against trunk revision 1134854. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/614//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/614//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/614//console This message is automatically generated. > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16174-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:46:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EADDD45BF for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99828 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:46:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99767 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99587 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:46:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:46:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:46:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51851414BF4 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:45:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <522825405.205.1307850352330.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048214#comment-13048214 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #648 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/648/]) HADOOP-7383. HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134857 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/libraries.properties > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16175-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 03:54:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0385942D0 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3025 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:54:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2898 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 03:54:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2720 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 03:54:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:54:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:54:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F57414E29 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:53:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <693132022.253.1307850832144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048218#comment-13048218 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7374: ------------------------------------- +1 > hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16176-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:16:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07C594DE2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13149 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13117 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12979 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:16:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:16:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:16:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8351E41427C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:15:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1102242304.281.1307852151534.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7374) Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Release Note: The scripts that run Hadoop no longer automatically add tools.jar from the JDK to the classpath (if it is present). If your job depends on tools.jar in the JDK you will need to add this dependency in your job. Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) Summary: Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop (was: hadoop-config.sh shouldn't add tools.jar to the classpath) Thanks Todd! I've committed this. > Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16177-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:18:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C420147B6 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13585 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:18:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13546 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:18:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13534 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:18:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:18:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:18:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77BE4142D5 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:17:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1873673710.285.1307852271748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7374) Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16178-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:20:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62C1F4030 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14275 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14068 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14046 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122514143B5 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <962603696.291.1307852393070.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7328.r2.diff Reviewed patch attached. (+ a couple of bad whitespace fixes) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16179-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:20:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C8784035 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14333 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14077 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14060 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9D54143BA for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <494261327.296.1307852393236.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16180-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:20:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CE564056 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14682 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14584 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14564 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:20:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:20:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CD24143BC for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:19:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1542507896.298.1307852393286.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16181-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:36:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A71254706 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19925 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19856 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19844 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E31541473C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:35:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <446984878.316.1307853353317.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048229#comment-13048229 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #649 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/649/]) HADOOP-7374. Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134861 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/rcc > Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16182-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:36:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F8E471B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20505 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20465 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20446 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:36:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:36:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DE0414739 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:35:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <40917355.313.1307853353217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048228#comment-13048228 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7328: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482273/HADOOP-7328.r2.diff against trunk revision 1134861. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/615//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/615//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/615//console This message is automatically generated. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16183-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 04:44:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6BE47F7 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31329 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:44:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31300 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 04:44:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31285 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 04:44:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:44:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:44:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A475414953 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:43:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1398361038.339.1307853833104.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048235#comment-13048235 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- bq. On 2011-06-12 02:24:55, Todd Lipcon wrote: bq. > Looks good to me. Can you upload this rev of the patch to the JIRA so the QA Bot runs on it? Submitted on JIRA. Thanks for the review Todd! - Harsh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review805 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-06-11 22:10:17, Harsh J wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-06-11 22:10:17) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. bq. bq. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. bq. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Harsh bq. bq. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16184-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 05:10:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0DBC456C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39128 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 05:10:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39000 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 05:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38981 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 05:10:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:10:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D55414010 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:09:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <590218562.378.1307855391749.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Attachment: gitk-example.png HADOOP-7106.sh HADOOP-7106-git.sh Here are the final (I think) versions of the scripts to use. A few changes since previous one: - uses shopt -s dotglob since the previous version accidentally left common's .gitignore and .eclipse-templates in the root dir - does combined trees for MR-279, HDFS-1073, yahoo-merge - had to redo the order so those trees come before "trunk" - otherwise for some reason git-svn's tracking got messed up and HDFS-1073 ended up with a common subtree missing all of its subdirectories except for src Changes to the git script: - supports merging trees from upstream branches named different things (for MR-279 and HDFS-1073) - does a sanity check using git-ls-tree to make sure that the tree checksum in the combined repo matches exactly the tree checksum of the last pre-7106 commit in the old repo (this is how I found the problem with the dotfiles and the missing dirs) I've also attached a gitk screenshot showing what it looks like in the git mirror > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16185-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 06:04:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97B804DC1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53141 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53115 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53089 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 06:04:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:04:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:04:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5DD414A58 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:03:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <67823723.448.1307858631571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6605-3.patch Thanks for the feedback everyone. Popping the stack, Hadoop requires the us= er set JAVA_HOME for two reasons: # We want to add tools.jar to the classpath, and JAVA_HOME let's the user s= pecify a base directory to look (other than the default java which may be f= rom a JRE and therefore not have tools.jar). This is no longer an issue sin= ce HADOOP-7374 removed it. # We want to respect JAVA_HOME even if there is already a java in the path.= Ie users and admins can easily configure which java should be used with Ha= doop that's different from the default system java. This makes sense given = that Hadoop is picky. Therefore it makes sense to only auto-detect JAVA_HOM= E if it is not set (which all versions of the patch do) and we can determin= e a reasonable value. On OSX, they provide an API (java_home(1)) that does this (returns a path s= uitable for setting JAVA_HOME based on enabled/preferred JVM'S as set by Ja= va Preferences). I think we agree it makes sense to use this. On Linux, there is no single API that works across distributions. Even thou= gh alternatives is widely available it works differently on different distr= iubtions (also, it indicates where the java binary lives, not where JAVA_HO= ME is, though you could determine that with readlink). There are well-known= locations where JAVA_HOME is installed that you can check to reasonably de= tect it. This is the approach taken by the previous patch. I've provided da= ta that shows that checking a set of directories does not measurably impact= the execution time (therefore "too much work" sounds like a philosophical = objection rather than a technical objection to me). I've found that globbin= g is not an issue in practice because the glob does not match more than one= installation on a given system. This is because the JDK was resolved via a= packaging dependency and the package updates itself rather than having mul= tiple versions installed. People who manually install multiple JDKs typical= ly set JAVA_HOME explicitly and therefore the detection is not used. There = are no alternative proposals for autodetecting JAVA_HOME on Linux, and I'm = not going to spend any more time on this part for now so I'm dropping this = case from the patch. In any case (ha), there is consensus on the OSX approach so let's just go w= ith this for now. We can easily implement cases for other OS types in the f= uture if there's an approach that's acceptable. Patch attached. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-= 2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if= JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on = various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the e= nvironment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16186-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 06:08:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B51E14E54 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53583 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:08:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53552 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53535 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 06:08:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:08:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89977414B26 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:07:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <293728502.457.1307858871560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16187-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 06:24:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA0AF44F9 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56850 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56653 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 06:24:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56621 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 06:24:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:24:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:24:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D839414D9C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:23:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <571160235.470.1307859831510.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048252#comment-13048252 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6605: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482283/hadoop-6605-3.patch against trunk revision 1134861. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/616//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/616//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/616//console This message is automatically generated. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16188-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 09:06:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B73A4D7B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63922 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63888 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63867 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EA841534B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <574635695.623.1307869551725.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048274#comment-13048274 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7375: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #13 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/13/]) HADOOP-7375. Add resolvePath method to FileContext. Contributed by Sanjay Radia eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134854 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFsBaseTest.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileContext.java > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16190-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 09:06:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25CEE4D84 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64042 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63925 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63880 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C895F41534D for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <662307779.625.1307869551818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048275#comment-13048275 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #13 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/13/]) HADOOP-7374. Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134861 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/rcc > Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16189-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 09:06:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5FB4D7E for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63964 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63892 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63863 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:06:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CAB415348 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1763869152.620.1307869551614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048273#comment-13048273 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #13 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/13/]) HADOOP-7383. HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134857 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/libraries.properties > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16191-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 10:00:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B86144B1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94113 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 10:00:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94085 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 10:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94073 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 10:00:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:00:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:00:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11D1415B76 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:59:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Charles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <94840952.693.1307872792787.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048284#comment-13048284 ] Eric Charles commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------- Hi, Jenkins haddop-common-trunk is blue (builds fine). I've downloaded https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/13/artifact/trunk/target/hadoop-common-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz and imported it in eclipse via m2eclipse. Still need to add 3 folders in my build path to have operation project in eclipse: target/generated-sources/avro-protocol, avro-schema and record-cc (Maybe this can be solved with the build-helper-maven-plugin : http://www.sonatype.com/people/2008/05/adding-additional-source-folders-to-your-maven-build/) When I run "mvn test" in shell, I've got two failures in TestUserGroupInformation [1], however the TestUserGroupInformation run from eclipse works fine. Seems like UserGroupInformation behaves differently in shell than in eclipse. Same issue if I run "mvn test -P os.mac" (I run on mac). [1] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test set: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tests run: 14, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.389 sec <<< FAILURE! testGetServerSideGroups(org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation) Time elapsed: 0.029 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<13> but was:<0> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454) at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:97) ... testLogin(org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation) Time elapsed: 0 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43) at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54) at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testLogin(TestUserGroupInformation.java:122) ... > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16192-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 11:15:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E3154699 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35119 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35086 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35078 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33E8414B1C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <260028992.737.1307877291730.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7383) HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048295#comment-13048295 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7383: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #717 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/717/]) HADOOP-7383. HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134857 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/libraries.properties > HDFS needs to export protobuf library dependency in pom > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7383 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7383 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7383.txt > > > MR builds are failing since the HDFS protobuf patch went in, since they aren't picking up protobuf as a transitive dependency. I think we just need to add it to the HDFS pom template. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16193-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 11:15:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C4CF46A9 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35397 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35325 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35258 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1341414B21 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1040931579.741.1307877291919.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <634368540.9715.1307685358867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7375) Add resolvePath method to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048297#comment-13048297 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7375: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #717 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/717/]) HADOOP-7375. Add resolvePath method to FileContext. Contributed by Sanjay Radia eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134854 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFsBaseTest.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileContext.java > Add resolvePath method to FileContext > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7375 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7375 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: resolvePath1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16194-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 11:15:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C82646EA for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36881 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36844 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36836 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 11:15:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:15:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED86A414B22 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1535259791.742.1307877291969.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <308187203.8772.1307656679014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7374) Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048298#comment-13048298 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7374: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #717 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/717/]) HADOOP-7374. Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134861 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/rcc > Don't add tools.jar to the classpath when running Hadoop > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7374 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7374-1.patch > > > bin/hadoop-config.sh (and bin/rcc) add lib/tools.jar from JAVA_HOME to the classpath. This has been there since the initial commit of bin/hadoop, but I don't think it's needed. *Executing* Hadoop does not depend on tools.jar (or other libraries only available in the JDK, not the JRE) so let's not automatically add it. Marking this as an incompatible change since a job could potentially have relied on Hadoop adding tools.jar to the CLASSPATH automatically (though such a job would not have run on a system that did not have JAVA_HOME point to a jdk). The build of course still requires a JDK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16195-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 14:21:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2094265 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30207 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30177 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 14:21:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:21:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:21:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9207E415BAB for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:20:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1866786569.917.1307888451594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6936) broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048331#comment-13048331 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6936: --------------------------------- Fixed the FAQ links. The HowToConfigure page is highly outdated. I do not know if it still serves a purpose beyond the tutorial (which explains how to too). It could be possibly set up to redirect to a current documentation. But as Nicholas notes, this is all doable by anyone signed into the Wiki (free account signups, just gotta enter captchas). Filing a JIRA for this is not required. > broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6936 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eugene Koontz > Priority: Trivial > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s > has links to : > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.replication.min > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.safemode.threshold.pct > both of which are 404 as of time of filing this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16196-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 14:25:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDEA442C7 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31250 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31188 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31179 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 14:25:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:25:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F0415D2E for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:24:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <142929921.924.1307888691575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6574) Commit HADOOP-6414:Add command line help for -expunge command. to Hadoop 0.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048334#comment-13048334 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6574: --------------------------------- Ravi, is this still required? If it is, please list it as a fix version against the upcoming 0.20.x release (204?) and post a new patch if required? > Commit HADOOP-6414:Add command line help for -expunge command. to Hadoop 0.20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6574 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6574 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-6574.patch > > > HADOOP-6414 : Add command line help for -expunge command. needs to be committed to Hadoop 0.20. > Opening this new Jira to address this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16197-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 14:31:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF2344B9B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38601 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38570 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38562 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:31:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E72415EB2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:30:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1457617233.932.1307889051528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6406) hadoop-core.pom contains hardcoded and nonexistent commons-cli version and jetty groupId/artifactId mixup MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048337#comment-13048337 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6406: --------------------------------- Marcel, Is this still valid? I do not see a hadoop-core.pom file anywhere? > hadoop-core.pom contains hardcoded and nonexistent commons-cli version and jetty groupId/artifactId mixup > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Marcel May > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-6406.patch > > > hadoop-core.pom in trunk contains > a) hardcoded non-existing commons-cli version "2.0-20070823" > b) jetty groupId/artifactId mixup : the given artifactId is the groupId, the groupId is the artifactId -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16198-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:07:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0683A4ACB for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65720 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65681 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65673 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:07:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:07:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:07:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E004155D4 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <955728521.963.1307891211610.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1311101848.10328.1300399589594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7197) Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048344#comment-13048344 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7197: --------------------------------- I think ~/.ssh/config changes make it a better approach for the site on the whole as well. > Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE > Reporter: Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios > Priority: Trivial > Labels: hadoop > Attachments: slaves.sh.patch > > > I was trying to add a slave that ran sshd in a non-standard port (eg. 2222 in stead of 22), when I noticed that there was no way to support another port through the configuration for a single node. > Supporting a different port for all the slaves is possible through the HADOOP_SSH_OPTS variable, but not for a single slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16199-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:15:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEF8F4D1B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69598 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:15:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69551 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:15:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69341 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:15:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:15:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:15:23 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E71415760 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1440412372.968.1307891703336.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6251) Incorrect sample code in javadoc for org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-6251. ----------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Already fixed in MAPREDUCE-1407. This issue duplicates MAPREDUCE-1407 > Incorrect sample code in javadoc for org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.Mapper > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Yasuko Komiyama > Priority: Trivial > > In the javadoc description about mapreduce.Mapper class, there is an example code "TokenCounterMapper", and it calls context.collect() in the map() method. It should call context.write(). > context.collect(word, one); ----> context.write(word, one); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16200-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:19:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25A9F4EA8 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74151 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:19:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74107 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:19:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74070 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:19:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:19:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:19:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD4F4158A1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <132484621.970.1307891931704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6238) (very) minor typo in javadoc for org.apache.hadoop.util.Tool MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-6238. ----------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Already fixed by HADOOP-6504 Issue duplicates HADOOP-6504 > (very) minor typo in javadoc for org.apache.hadoop.util.Tool > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Parker Jones > Priority: Trivial > Original Estimate: 0.25h > Remaining Estimate: 0.25h > > In the description, "Here is how a typical Tool is implemented:" there's some sample code for a class called "MyApp" that gives a simple implementation of Tool. In its main method, it references a class "Sort" where I believe MyApp should appear: > int res = ToolRunner.run(new Configuration(), new Sort(), args); > should be > int res = ToolRunner.run(new Configuration(), new MyApp(), args); > I'm brand-new to hadoop (Day 1) and was initially confused how ToolRunner knew which class to run. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16201-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:29:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A7C1467B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88678 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:29:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88648 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88640 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:29:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:29:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:29:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE80B415BFD for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1475913333.990.1307892531908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6219) Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-6219: ---------------------------- Attachment: MAPREDUCE-919.patch Reuploading Chaitanya's patch to mark as PA and get QA to run the right (la= test timestamp) one instead of Yahoo's internal patches=E2=80=A6 > Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6219 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Ramya R > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-6184-ydist.patch, HADOOP-6219-ydist.patch, MA= PREDUCE-919.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch > > > Execution of bin/hadoop should show the -dumpConfiguration option introdu= ced in MAPREDUCE-768 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16202-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:31:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D4E14D56 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89195 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89154 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89146 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8279C415CCA for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <325266518.994.1307892651531.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6219) Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-6219: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Marking as PA. Patch still applies clean to trunk (1 line offset). > Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6219 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Ramya R > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6184-ydist.patch, HADOOP-6219-ydist.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch > > > Execution of bin/hadoop should show the -dumpConfiguration option introduced in MAPREDUCE-768 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16203-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:31:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D68CD4D8A for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89458 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89414 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89406 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:31:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F2B415CCE for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:30:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <484746731.998.1307892651676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6219) Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-6219: ---------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) This issue is a duplicate of MAPREDUCE-919 > Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6219 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Ramya R > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6184-ydist.patch, HADOOP-6219-ydist.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch > > > Execution of bin/hadoop should show the -dumpConfiguration option introduced in MAPREDUCE-768 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16204-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:33:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFD0548E4 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91925 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:33:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91893 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91885 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:33:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:33:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:33:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94527415DF8 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <145536999.1002.1307892771604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-6219) Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J reopened HADOOP-6219: ----------------------------- Sorry, pretty strange that both link to same issue? Ideally it should be under mapred project now. > Add dumpConfiguration option in hadoop help message > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6219 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6219 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Ramya R > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6184-ydist.patch, HADOOP-6219-ydist.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch, MAPREDUCE-919.patch > > > Execution of bin/hadoop should show the -dumpConfiguration option introduced in MAPREDUCE-768 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16205-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 15:57:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C906A4A75 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18178 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:57:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18119 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 15:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17796 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 15:57:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:57:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:57:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C093415426 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:56:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <229916015.1047.1307894211570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-5624) @Override cleanup for Eclipse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-5624. ----------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem Eclipse does not seem to complain for any of the patch's changes. I do not see any @Override issues on trunk of all three projects right now. Please do not hesitate to re-open in case it is still an issue as per. > @Override cleanup for Eclipse > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5624 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5624 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Carlos Valiente > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-5624.patch > > > Eclipse complains about several methods which are marked as {{@Override}}, but which are not defined in any superclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16206-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 16:01:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9F90425A for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23298 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 16:01:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23080 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 16:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23072 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 16:01:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:01:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8D4154F0 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:00:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1566492830.1051.1307894451773.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-2988) Trash not being deleted on time MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048363#comment-13048363 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-2988: --------------------------------- Koji, Given that the TestTrash class has an Emptier thread test that passes, is this still a problem? > Trash not being deleted on time > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-2988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.14.3 > Reporter: Koji Noguchi > Priority: Trivial > > On one of our cluster, we set the Trash interval to 6 hrs. > However, sometimes the namenode doesn't delete the Trash dir on time. > -bash-3.00$ hadoop dfs -ls /Trash > Found 3 items > /Trash/0711201201 2007-11-20 06:00 > /Trash/0711201800 2007-11-20 12:15 > /Trash/Current 2007-11-20 18:01 > In our current setting, we're supposed to have only one 'current' and one previous snapshot. > Grepping shows that /Trash/0711201201 was not even touched. > My guess is that 1800 - 1201 = 5 hrs 59min < 6hrs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16207-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 18:00:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9D074DC0 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30841 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:00:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30695 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30687 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 18:00:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:00:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:00:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BF1415FDB for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:59:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <27096257.1208.1307901592597.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048394#comment-13048394 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- Awesome! Thanks Todd. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16208-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 18:53:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE7A547D4 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73300 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:53:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73270 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73262 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 18:53:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:53:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:53:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956B415F34 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:52:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1244652372.1326.1307904771624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6936) broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-6936. ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Just for a history lesson ref. here: There used to be hadoop-*.xml files on= ce upon a time. Its now split over to core-*, hdfs-*, mapred-* files (* -> = {site, default}). Closing as the HowToConfigure link has also been updated by me. Although it= needs more love in general (We should switch to confluence=E2=80=A6 its mo= re encouraging). > broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6936 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eugene Koontz > Priority: Trivial > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s=20 > has links to : > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.replic= ation.min > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.safe= mode.threshold.pct > both of which are 404 as of time of filing this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16209-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 18:57:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B87CF488F for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75575 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75547 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 18:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75539 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 18:57:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:57:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875A4415060 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <589524318.1329.1307905011551.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6936) broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048413#comment-13048413 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6936: --------------------------------- Failed to add, link that has proper sublinks is: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html#Configuration+Files > broken links in http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6936 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6936 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eugene Koontz > Priority: Trivial > Labels: wiki > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/FAQ#A12//s > has links to : > http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.replication.min > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/hadoop-default.html#dfs.safemode.threshold.pct > both of which are 404 as of time of filing this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16210-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 19:21:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9D3148A2 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94491 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 19:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94451 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 19:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94443 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 19:21:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:21:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:21:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0AF41565B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:20:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <717022041.1367.1307906451705.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7361) Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048418#comment-13048418 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7361: --------------------------------- Seems to be in parallel contention with HADOOP-7176 efforts by Daryn Sharp. > Provide overwrite option (-overwrite/-f) in put and copyFromLocal command line options > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7361 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7361 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1608-src.patch, HDFS-1608-test.patch > > > FileSystem has the API > *public void copyFromLocalFile(boolean delSrc, boolean overwrite, Path[] srcs, Path dst)* > > > This API provides overwrite option. But the mapping command line doesn't have this option. To maintain the consistency and better usage the command line option also can support the overwrite option like to put the files forcefully. ( put [-f] ) and also for copyFromLocal command line option. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16211-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 22:34:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D055B4371 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46702 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46670 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46662 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 22:34:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:34:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:34:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902AC4164D0 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:33:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1650637010.1532.1307918031587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6344) rm and rmr fail to correctly move the user's files to the trash prior to deleting when they are over quota. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-6344: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 0.22.0 > rm and rmr fail to correctly move the user's files to the trash prior to deleting when they are over quota. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6344 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6344 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: gary murry > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-740-for-Y20.patch, HDFS-740.patch > > > With trash turned on, if a user is over his quota and does a rm (or rmr), the file is deleted without a copy being placed in the trash. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16212-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 22:38:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D525C441B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47444 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:38:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47410 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 22:38:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47402 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 22:38:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:38:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:38:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B80416574 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:37:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101269183.1542.1307918271745.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6599) Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-6599: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 > Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6599 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6599.1.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.rel20.patch > > > Currently RPC metrics tracks items that provides summary of RPC usage along with more detailed per method statistics that tracks number of method calls made, time spent on that call. Combining both summary and detailed together results in large metrics report which metrics collection systems may not handle. Proposal is to split the metrics into summary and detailed metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16213-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 23:28:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1F9B41E1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75091 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75064 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75056 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 23:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:28:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC32A416BFC for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:27:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2086985344.1547.1307921271702.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048439#comment-13048439 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #651 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/651/]) Add HADOOP-7106 to CHANGES.txt for trunk. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135001 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/hdfs/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/mapreduce/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16214-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 12 23:42:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 305D64AEF for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83326 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:42:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83289 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2011 23:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83279 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2011 23:42:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:42:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99633416E33 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:41:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <327361541.1573.1307922111624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048440#comment-13048440 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- I committed this this afternoon. I posted some instructions about how to migrate here: http://markmail.org/message/cmyx2ojtn6dj6wlp Next we need to remove the transitional lines from the auth template and mailer config, right? Then, we can resolve this? > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16215-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 00:42:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BCEE4D53 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14147 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14120 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14109 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 00:42:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:42:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:42:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F49416779 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:41:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7384 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16216-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 00:52:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A166D43A3 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17139 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17131 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D3E416948 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:51:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <578994662.1619.1307926312016.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16217-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 00:52:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5610F43AD for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17427 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17396 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17388 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 00:52:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:52:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAD9416946 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:51:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1879813115.1617.1307926311966.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7384.txt Here's a transcript of my manual testing: todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ git show | PATCH=echo src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh - Looks like this is a git patch. Stripping a/ and b/ prefixes and incrementing PLEVEL Looks like this is relative to project root. Increasing PLEVEL Going to apply patch with: echo -p2 -p2 -E todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ git show --no-prefix | PATCH=echo src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh - Looks like this is relative to project root. Increasing PLEVEL Going to apply patch with: echo -p1 -p1 -E todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ git show --relative | PATCH=echo src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh - Looks like this is a git patch. Stripping a/ and b/ prefixes and incrementing PLEVEL Going to apply patch with: echo -p1 -p1 -E todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ git show --relative --no-prefix | PATCH=echo src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh - Going to apply patch with: echo -p0 -p0 -E todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ echo > CHANGES.txt ; echo > ../mapreduce/CHANGES.txt todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ git diff | PATCH=echo src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh - Looks like this is a git patch. Stripping a/ and b/ prefixes and incrementing PLEVEL Looks like this is a cross-subproject patch. Not supported! todd@todd-w510:~/git/hadoop-common/common$ echo $? 1 > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16218-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 03:30:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A09BB60E5 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95772 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95737 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:30:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95722 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 03:30:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:30:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:30:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F80A4163D0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:29:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1359391911.1771.1307935793453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048450#comment-13048450 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------------------- Todd, the history for MR-279 branch (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/MR-279) is completely lost. OTOH, I just verified that mapreduce and hdfs history is (correctly) retained in both the trunk and branch-0.21 branches. Was this a mistake? I am hoping we can get back the lost history. Right? > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16219-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 03:32:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07BA46D95 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96348 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96280 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96269 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 03:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:32:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCDF41644B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:31:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <742343018.1774.1307935911520.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048451#comment-13048451 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7379: ------------------------------------- bq. What will it take to get ipc.Server to understand PB rather than Writable? You mean using PBs for the actual invocations? Or the "header" type info at the beginning? I think most of the value from PB comes from the evolvable parameter types, but moving to PB for the headers would also allow us to do things like add extra metadata to requests without breaking previous versions (eg dapper-style tracing info?) > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16220-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 03:34:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22A3363BF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96954 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:34:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96836 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96820 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 03:34:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:34:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:34:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03665416538 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:33:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <479678623.1785.1307936032010.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048453#comment-13048453 ] Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------------------- Sorry, I take my comment back. The history is also split between the projects under MR-279, I see it under mapreduce. I was confused as MR-279 is supposed to be a branch of only mapreduce pre-project split :) False alarm! Thanks for the good work! > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16221-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 03:38:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D671649D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99895 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:38:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99855 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 03:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99832 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 03:38:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:38:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:38:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58920416710 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:37:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <812082732.1835.1307936272359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048455#comment-13048455 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- Hey Vinod -- yep, MR-279 is now a "cross-project branch" that includes the yahoo-merge versions of common and hdfs. I figured that will make it easier for you to develop since many of the yahoo-merge changes are specifically for MR-279. Glad to hear you found the history, too :) > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16222-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 05:00:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BD06645D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33061 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 05:00:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33015 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 05:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32974 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 05:00:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:00:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D71416AB0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:59:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1038446292.1991.1307941191802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048467#comment-13048467 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- Eric, I noticed the same test failures when running on Jenkins (https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/8/), but I can't reproduce locally (on Mac), or on Jenkins with Ant (see https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.security/TestUserGroupInformation/testGetServerSideGroups/). Seems like some kind of environment issue. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16223-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 05:16:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24E556D72 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38186 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 05:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37968 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 05:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37959 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 05:16:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:16:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:16:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824C3416F35 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 05:15:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <623913763.2022.1307942151529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142137633.58455.1306902167529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7348) Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048469#comment-13048469 ] XieXianshan commented on HADOOP-7348: ------------------------------------- It`s my pleasure. :D > Modify the option of FsShell getmerge from [addnl] to [-nl] for more comprehensive > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7348 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch, HADOOP-7348.patch_2 > > > The [addnl] option of FsShell getmerge should be either "true" or "false",but it is very hard to understand by users, especially who`s never used this option before. > So,the [addnl] option should be changed to [-nl] for more comprehensive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16224-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 07:18:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C65B76144 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16285 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 07:18:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15948 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 07:18:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15863 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 07:18:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:18:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:18:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42552416593 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:17:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Charles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1809483786.2193.1307949473268.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048496#comment-13048496 ] Eric Charles commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------- Hi Tom, Yes, sounds like environment, not code, issue. I'm used to maven, but completely new to hadoop, especially regarding the way hadoop relies on Operating Systems functions (I see many Runtime calls in the code). First of all, I will try to let the common project tests work in eclipse. If I run "ant test", all tests are successfull. But if I run them eclipse, about half are failing. I will post on mailing list for this. I think getting the solution for this will help to fix the TestUserGroupInformation test (working in eclipse, but not in command line). > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16225-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 11:26:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C8BD620C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42090 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 11:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42031 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 11:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42017 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 11:26:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:26:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C0041791F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:25:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2090749820.2326.1307964351724.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048520#comment-13048520 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #719 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/719/]) Add HADOOP-7106 to CHANGES.txt for trunk. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135001 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/hdfs/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/mapreduce/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16226-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 12:31:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9236468D1 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7778 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 12:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7733 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 12:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7725 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 12:31:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:31:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F618417BB8 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:30:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2094014708.2451.1307968252321.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048535#comment-13048535 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7020: ---------------------------------------- I prefer the hadoop-elephant-pb image, though of course you need a tm marker on apache and hadoop. The alternative I think might be good is powered-by-hadoop.png, because it clearly differentiates Hadoop itself from things powered by apache hadoop. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16227-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 14:04:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C56FB67A9 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8627 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8478 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 14:04:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:04:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:04:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E927417E0D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1711135966.2567.1307973831580.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048566#comment-13048566 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- +1 Beautiful! My only suggestion would be to consider use double brackets (ie. [[ ... ]]) so you don't have to add quotes around the variables. Double brackets do 1-pass expansion, as opposed to single brackets that expanded and re-parse which leads to problem with variables contains space or other metachars unless quotes are added. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16228-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 14:08:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A126AE8 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18091 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18051 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 14:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18035 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 14:08:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:08:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA91417034 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <380982275.2581.1307974071908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048568#comment-13048568 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- We have a Snappy codec in brisk based on the java-snappy project: http://code.google.com/p/snappy-java/ We did this because snappy-java is ASL, in maven, and comes with pre-built with shared libs for win, linux, and osx. For end users this is a much lower bar to getting into their system. https://github.com/riptano/brisk/tree/master/src/java/src/com/hadoop/compression/snappy I'm confused on how to contribue this back based on the above comments :) should we submit a patch or release this as a standalone github project? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16229-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:56:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 114146485 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18874 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:56:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18846 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 15:56:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18805 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 15:56:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:56:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:56:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60441715B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:55:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <671034748.2828.1307980551825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048612#comment-13048612 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ I still think this is a bad idea, even if we are limiting to OS X. BTW, the patch should use -x, not -e. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16230-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 16:38:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 742F066A0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24802 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:38:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24743 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:38:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24726 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 16:38:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:38:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:38:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1309417895 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:37:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1049301347.2996.1307983071788.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6605-4.patch Thanks for the feedback guys. Patch attached uses double brackets and -x. Allen, I think this patch addresses the specific concern you raised (searching too many directories, the Linux stuff). This patch does pretty minimal work (just calls out to java_home). It does still execute on each command, that's intentional and IMO OK because per above it's minimal work and otherwise Hadoop would not notice when the user changed their JAVA_HOME preference. Lemme know if you're -1 or -0. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16231-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 16:58:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D866E6C30 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74423 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74397 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 16:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74389 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 16:58:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:58:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:58:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922E24174AF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:57:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1680665884.3082.1307984271595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048651#comment-13048651 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- I'd like to succinctly reassert that it's unexpected behavior, on OS X, for a java app to not honor the user's preference. FWIW, I've never had to explicitly define JAVA_HOME for an app. For instance, Tomcat doesn't require the user to explicitly define JAVA_HOME to start the server. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16232-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:15:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B0FC6B48 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19022 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18991 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18983 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:15:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EC6417D68 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:14:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <507887964.3143.1307985292217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048661#comment-13048661 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7020: --------------------------------------- I still prefer the silver circle variant [^PoweredByApacheHadoop.png]. Alison's one is very artistic, but looks like a logo for a different project [^powered_by_hadoop.jpg]. It looks like we are developing quite the range of options. I propose that we vote with single transferable vote. If you have any more candidates, upload them here by tomorrow 14 June at 5pm PST. I'll start a thread on general then calling for votes between the options. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16233-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:25:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BA86644B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41812 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41767 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41730 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:25:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:25:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4BE418240 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. ie.: Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16234-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 17:57:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A99D46E23 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83532 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:57:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83468 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:57:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83460 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:57:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:57:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:57:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C725418D9E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:56:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1635251930.3251.1307987812309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048672#comment-13048672 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ I'll change my vote to 0 for this particular change to add support for OS X. (I keep meaning to check Lion but keep forgetting. Too busy working on other Lion bugs...). This means we should change the case statement to a single if test. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16235-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:25:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4F8C612B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30854 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30815 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30807 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:25:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:25:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:25:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD23418B50 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1896926805.3380.1307989493106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048694#comment-13048694 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review817 ----------------------------------------------------------- Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a null here? Shouldn't it check for null result from getSerialization(), then throw a (non-NPE) exception? Or do you prefer to do that check and throw at a higher level of the code? - Matt On 2011-06-11 22:10:17, Harsh J wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-06-11 22:10:17) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. bq. bq. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. bq. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Harsh bq. bq. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16236-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:27:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25C0B6291 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34665 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:27:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34625 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34617 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:27:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:27:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9364418BF8 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:26:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1451554905.3385.1307989611886.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048695#comment-13048695 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6605: --------------------------------------- +1 on the OS X detection > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16237-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:33:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E24D265E0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48410 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:33:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48366 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48358 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:33:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:33:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:33:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06301418E40 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:32:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2089129157.3399.1307989973022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048698#comment-13048698 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- bq. On 2011-06-13 18:23:35, Matt Foley wrote: bq. > Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a null here? Shouldn't it check for null result from getSerialization(), then throw a (non-NPE) exception? Or do you prefer to do that check and throw at a higher level of the code? I thought about this while doing the review... my thinking was that our other similar APIs do return null -eg CompressionCodecFactory.getCodecByName() returns null if the specified codec isn't found. This API is also marked as LimitedPrivate Evolving so it shouldn't be a problematic breaking change. Maybe we should add a bit of javadoc saying "@returns null if no serializer is known for the given class." ? - Todd ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review817 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-06-11 22:10:17, Harsh J wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-06-11 22:10:17) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. bq. bq. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. bq. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Harsh bq. bq. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16238-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 18:55:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 616976938 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92882 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:55:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92853 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 18:55:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92845 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 18:55:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:55:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:55:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CB041887B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:54:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <830594891.3465.1307991292143.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048707#comment-13048707 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Great, thanks Allen! From everything I've read, Java Prefs and /usr/libexec/java_home are still present in Lion. Apple is a major contributor to OpenJDK so I don't think Java will be fading soon. Jobs arm twisted Oracle into releasing and supporting future Java releases. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16239-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 19:13:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED25B6A69 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39634 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 19:13:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39593 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 19:13:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39585 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 19:13:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:13:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:13:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AD941822C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1412681699.3587.1307992372982.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048722#comment-13048722 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- bq. On 2011-06-13 18:23:35, Matt Foley wrote: bq. > Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a null here? Shouldn't it check for null result from getSerialization(), then throw a (non-NPE) exception? Or do you prefer to do that check and throw at a higher level of the code? bq. bq. Todd Lipcon wrote: bq. I thought about this while doing the review... my thinking was that our other similar APIs do return null -eg CompressionCodecFactory.getCodecByName() returns null if the specified codec isn't found. This API is also marked as LimitedPrivate Evolving so it shouldn't be a problematic breaking change. bq. bq. Maybe we should add a bit of javadoc saying "@returns null if no serializer is known for the given class." ? The public method getSerialization() returns a null if it does not find an acceptor. I think it is fair that a get{Serializer,Deserializer}() call do the same since they are specific nature calls underneath? Or we could revamp the entire set if Exceptions are better to have over null returns and null checks, but it ought to be consistent is what I think. - Harsh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review817 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-06-11 22:10:17, Harsh J wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-06-11 22:10:17) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. bq. bq. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. bq. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Harsh bq. bq. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16240-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:22:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 935406D52 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86606 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86543 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86535 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692F4138C6 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <593714438.25.1308000107548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: mvn-layout-f.sh HADOOP-6671-f.patch Patch rebased on top of current (unsplitted) trunk. new stuff: * findbugs wired * javadocs use the Hadoop doclet Still missing: * DEB/RPM generation > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16241-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:22:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C21E16D5D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86759 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86705 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86643 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:22:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4444138E0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956595386.51.1308000108313.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048788#comment-13048788 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- Some additional info on the TestUserGroupInformation failure, if running the test alone (-Dtest=TestUserGroupInformation) the test passes (both on Mac and Linux) > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16242-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:26:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EDCD6EA1 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97150 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97121 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:26:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97113 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:26:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:26:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:26:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65328413B15 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <664739753.84.1308000347411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048793#comment-13048793 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6671: ---------------------------------------- @Alejandro: does this test fail for you when running the full test suite, but not when run in isolation? Or does this test not fail for you at all? > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16243-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:32:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ECCA6AF7 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5542 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:32:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5516 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5508 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:32:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:32:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:32:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D8A413CDA for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <999591541.125.1308000707462.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6835) Support concatenated gzip files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-6835: ------------------------------------- Summary: Support concatenated gzip files (was: Support concatenated gzip and bzip2 files) > Support concatenated gzip files > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6835 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6835 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Greg Roelofs > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: C6835-9.patch, HADOOP-6835.v3.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.trunk-hadoop-mapreduce.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, HADOOP-6835.v5.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v6.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v7.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v8.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v9.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, MR-469.v2.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, grr-hadoop-common.dif.20100614c, grr-hadoop-mapreduce.dif.20100614c > > > When running MapReduce with concatenated gzip files as input only the first part is read, which is confusing, to say the least. Concatenated gzip is described in http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.html#Advanced-usage and in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1952.txt. (See original report at http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-Hadoop-and-concatenated-gzip-files-to21383097.html) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16244-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:34:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFEB26423 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6403 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6326 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6318 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:34:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0B2413E3F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1674077446.146.1308000827504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7386) Support concatenated bzip2 files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Support concatenated bzip2 files -------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7386 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7386 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Allen Wittenauer HADOOP-6835 added the framework and direct support for concatenated gzip files. We should do the same for bzip files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16245-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:40:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2788B6747 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21284 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:40:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21096 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21088 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:40:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:40:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665984134C2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1444673059.214.1308001187388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048800#comment-13048800 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------- Is maven executing tests in a "per-test fork" mode? Or is it trying to execute them all in one JVM instantiation? UGI relies on some static state (the "login user") which might be busted if it runs in the same JVM as other test cases. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16246-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:44:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B41D66929 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28485 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:44:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28458 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28440 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:44:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:44:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:44:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E862B413642 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <800822925.265.1308001427948.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048803#comment-13048803 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- @ATM: only when running full test suite, just that test passes @Todd: doing a per-test fork (that is the odd thing, at first thought the same) > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16247-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 21:50:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E286F80 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39040 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:50:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38999 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 21:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38991 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 21:50:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:50:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:50:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A124138AC for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <21611571.277.1308001787486.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048805#comment-13048805 ] Brock Noland commented on HADOOP-7325: -------------------------------------- Looking at the hdfs and mapred commands, they do not seem to allow the "command" to be a direct classname and also have unknown command handling built in, so I do not think they need to be updated. If someone disagrees, please share! {code} elif [ "$COMMAND" = "groups" ] ; then CLASS=org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.tools.GetGroups else echo $COMMAND - invalid command print_usage exit {code} > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16248-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:26:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C3B06AF2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20425 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:26:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20359 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:26:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20312 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:26:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:26:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B8A413D1A for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7387 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang Priority: Minor When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16249-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:28:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBAD76B47 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23234 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23202 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23194 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:28:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD0A413DAC for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1289531762.389.1308004067520.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6605-5.patch Thanks guys. Patch attached, same as the last, just changes the case stmt to an if stmt. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16250-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:32:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB5CF6563 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26596 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26565 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26557 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752B413F4E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1451616256.403.1308004307551.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048835#comment-13048835 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7325: ------------------------------------- Sounds right to me. Thanks for looking. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-1.patch, hadoop-illegal-class-name-2.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16251-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:32:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0519D656F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26829 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26788 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26663 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:32:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF22413F54 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <589245674.409.1308004307713.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048836#comment-13048836 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7384: ----------------------------------- +1 This looks like a useful change. > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16252-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:36:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB6BF618C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35239 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35198 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35185 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:36:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:36:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:36:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0658C41334F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:35:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2082700715.455.1308004549022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048839#comment-13048839 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- +1 I'd recommend double square brackets again to eliminate need to quote, but not a huge deal. Can't wait to enjoy this patch! > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16253-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:38:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1389C61F5 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36550 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:38:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36477 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:38:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36295 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:38:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A480413431 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <9085317.460.1308004667366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7388) Remove definition of HADOOP_HOME and HADOOP_PREFIX from hadoop-env.sh.template MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove definition of HADOOP_HOME and HADOOP_PREFIX from hadoop-env.sh.template ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7388 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7388 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang Priority: Trivial The file structure layout proposed in HADOOP-6255 was designed to remove the need of using HADOOP_HOME environment to locate hadoop bits. The file structure layout should be able to map to /usr or system directories, therefore HADOOP_HOME is renamed to HADOOP_PREFIX to be more concise. HADOOP_PREFIX should not be exported to the user. If the user use hadoop-setup-single-node.sh or hadoop-setup-conf.sh to configure hadoop, the current scripts put HADOOP_PREFIX/HADOOP_HOME in hadoop-env.sh. The config template generation code should remove reference of HADOOP_PREFIX/HADOOP_HOME from hadoop-env.sh. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16254-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:46:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2F746B50 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46765 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:46:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46743 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46735 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:46:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:46:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:46:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6D641376E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <787366486.476.1308005147629.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048843#comment-13048843 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Thanks. I left the if as single bracket to be consistent w the rest of the file. Perhaps file a new jira to convert bin/* over to double brackets? > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16255-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:48:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14F956895 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50107 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:48:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50075 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:48:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50067 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:48:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:48:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:48:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C935D413879 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1378699221.489.1308005267821.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks guys! > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16256-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:52:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81E7D6AFA for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53609 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53568 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53560 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155DD413A14 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:51:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <538357149.547.1308005509083.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048850#comment-13048850 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Jake, 1. Snappy-Java bundles the native libraries in the JAR itself. While that is convenient/clever packaging technique, this is different from how Hadoop handles native libraries (loading them from lib/native/${OS_ARCH}/). 2. The motivation for keeping hadoop-snappy independent of hadoop was that we could use it right the way in other projects (HBase already integrated it). I would strongly argue that native libraries should handled in a consistent maner in Hadoop. And, if the preference of the Hadoop folks is to bundle snappy in Hadoop (dismissing #2), then I'd advocate for bringing Hadoop-Snappy into Hadoop as this JIRA originally proposed. By doing this we would have 1 external dependency (snappy) instead 2 (snappy-java and snappy, with the side effect that if we need a new version of snappy we would have to wait for snappy-java to do a release with it). Thoughts? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16257-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 22:52:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFB856B04 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53840 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53763 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53569 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFCD413A15 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:51:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2072171727.548.1308005509119.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048851#comment-13048851 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Jake, 1. Snappy-Java bundles the native libraries in the JAR itself. While that is convenient/clever packaging technique, this is different from how Hadoop handles native libraries (loading them from lib/native/${OS_ARCH}/). 2. The motivation for keeping hadoop-snappy independent of hadoop was that we could use it right the way in other projects (HBase already integrated it). I would strongly argue that native libraries should handled in a consistent maner in Hadoop. And, if the preference of the Hadoop folks is to bundle snappy in Hadoop (dismissing #2), then I'd advocate for bringing Hadoop-Snappy into Hadoop as this JIRA originally proposed. By doing this we would have 1 external dependency (snappy) instead 2 (snappy-java and snappy, with the side effect that if we need a new version of snappy we would have to wait for snappy-java to do a release with it). Thoughts? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16258-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:08:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CADE46345 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77625 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77591 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77472 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:08:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:08:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:08:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721BF4140CF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <829548377.644.1308006467463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048860#comment-13048860 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #652 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/652/]) HADOOP-6605. Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config. Contributed by Eli Collins eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135333 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16259-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:16:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4821B66E4 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81694 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81657 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81644 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:16:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:16:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:16:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEB04143AA for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <705488537.689.1308006948499.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671-g.patch handles TAR creating in the same way other Ant delegated task are handled. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16260-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:22:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FF446A98 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87675 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:22:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87645 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87637 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:22:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:22:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:22:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5E74146AA for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <975289640.729.1308007307055.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048870#comment-13048870 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- Per-test in Ant (and Maven) creates a new JVM per TestCase class (not per method). When I move testGetServerSideGroups() to be the last method in TestUserGroupInformation it consistently fails in Ant, which suggests that it relies on static state (as Todd suggested). > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16261-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:26:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 811DB6B93 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92425 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92400 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:26:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92392 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:26:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:26:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:26:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA1A41489C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1548816915.763.1308007547253.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Attachment: mailer-conf.diff Here's a diff for asf-mailer.conf for the new layout. I simplified it a bit by using a fancier regular expression in the for_paths config. According to http://opensource.perlig.de/svnmailer/doc-1.0/ this is allowed. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16262-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:32:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94DC36741 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4936 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4908 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4900 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:32:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:32:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:32:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE4E414B2B for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <118449070.832.1308007907188.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reassigned HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16263-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:34:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F100C60E7 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9399 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9343 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9335 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:34:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:34:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:34:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB084414C2E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <843446758.904.1308008027697.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048879#comment-13048879 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- @Tom: that explains, thxs for the detective work. In my answer to Todd I meant testcase, didn't associate the per test to per test method. Then it makes sense to open a different JIRA to fix this testcase, right? (I don't think it would be an easy thing to do to get one JVM per test method, not to mention it would be tooooo slow) > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16264-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:38:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA67C632A for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18786 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18755 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18747 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943AB414DBE for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1341615972.958.1308008268603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048882#comment-13048882 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- I agree with 1) this should be in the source tree... however, if 2) is the stopgap, then it should be as easy as possible for folks to use these plugins till then (hence the choice of snappy-java). IMO the apache builds should come with native libraries for common platforms as well as packages. I'd be happy to see hadoop-snappy in the src but without proper distribution it's a barrier to entry for using native libraries. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16265-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:38:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 709CB6359 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19267 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19233 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19225 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:38:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:38:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F4D414DCA for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1899798280.970.1308008268951.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048883#comment-13048883 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7144: ----------------------------------------- Is the JMX provided in this jira exposes the document equivalent to the MBean or an MBeam method? If it is entire MBean, then this can cause issues with Namenode where live node list, dead node list, decom node list etc are returned in one huge json document. Should the access be per mbean property? > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16266-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:44:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 712D76443 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24744 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:44:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24640 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24632 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2750C41323E for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1997856959.987.1308008627157.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048889#comment-13048889 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6671: ---------------------------------------- I've figured out the issue. {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} replaces {{UserGroupInformation}}'s static reference to {{groups}} with an instance of {{TestingGroups}}. Once this occurs in a JVM, no subsequent calls to {{UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames(...)}} will work for any real users on the system. The test case in question compares the groups of the real user running the tests with the groups of that same user as determined by the {{UserGroupInformation}} class. The explanation for why this fails under maven when run as part of the suite, but not under maven when run in isolation or under ant is that those must run the test cases in different orders. The solution is that tests which call {{createUserForTesting}} should reset the static reference when they complete. I can work on a patch for this. Tom/Alejandro - do you think this should be done as a separate JIRA? Or part of this one? > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16267-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:46:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D448F6B97 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27698 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:46:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27667 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27659 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:46:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:46:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452554133DE for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <615882170.1020.1308008747279.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048891#comment-13048891 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------ Moving this discussion back to the Jira to decrease the number and size of emails and jira appends :-) It appears to me that getSerializer() should throw an exception on failure to return a usable value, because: * The method is only called on objects for which a serializer is expected to exist, so this truly is an "exceptional" condition. * The typical caller has no alternate strategy, as far as I know, so it will have to do a check for null then throw an exception anyway. The argument for consistency has merit, but this is all Hadoop stuff, so it is okay for us to improve the semantics, if such it would be. Nevertheless, I'm a "0" on this, do what you think best. And yes, please, any method that might return null should clearly document that fact in the javadocs. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16268-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:53:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A890D6ABB for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29824 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29789 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29781 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BBF413622 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1893629280.1035.1308009167491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7371: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7371.patch For "ant tar": - Sources are compressed to a jar file as $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/hadoop-source-[version].jar - Javadoc is compressed as $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/javadoc/hadoop-javadoc-[version].jar - Documents are relocated to $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/doc/hadoop - HADOOP_HOME is set to be the same as HADOOP_PREFIX > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7371.patch > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16269-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:57:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 336AA6F73 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37667 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37614 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37604 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95784137EE for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <867250086.1052.1308009407755.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048900#comment-13048900 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7371: ----------------------------------- For "ant source" - Create a hadoop-source-[version].tar.gz in build directory > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7371.patch > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16270-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:57:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 633576F84 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37880 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37828 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37668 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EC24137F2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brian Bockelman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <761331786.1056.1308009407856.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048902#comment-13048902 ] Brian Bockelman commented on HADOOP-7387: ----------------------------------------- I'm not sure this is a great idea. Like it or not (I don't really like the behavior), it's the way RPMs are expected to behave on the platform. To "fix" the behavior will make the RPM stick out. > Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Minor > > When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16271-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 13 23:57:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46AFA6F91 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38181 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38152 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38143 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:57:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:57:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E992C4137F5 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <983225575.1059.1308009407953.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048903#comment-13048903 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- @ATM, thanks. IMO it should be a separate JIRA > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16272-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 00:21:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B540D6E6D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59638 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:21:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59591 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:21:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59583 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 00:21:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:21:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:21:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83116414056 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <336474648.1143.1308010847533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Work started] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HADOOP-7387 started by Eric Yang. > Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Minor > > When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16273-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 00:23:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE95B6F2D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61821 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61775 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61757 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D15414128 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1523789827.1146.1308010967364.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7387: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Minor > > When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16274-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 00:23:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08B086F37 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62041 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61921 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61761 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA541412B for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <403402530.1149.1308010967443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7387: ------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Brian is right, the rpm behavior is not changeable, see: [http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~jw35/docs/rpm_config.html] And there are good reasons for .rpmsave backup files from package manager prospective. Hence, this is a won't fix. > Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Minor > > When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16275-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:07:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CEA16CF7 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12156 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12087 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11869 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:07:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:07:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6096A414C92 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers Fix For: 0.23.0 As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16276-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:09:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE7216D13 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13958 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13880 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13872 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:09:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:09:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EFB414CF9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <992977813.1212.1308013727610.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7389: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7389.0.patch The only thing I changed in {{TestUserGroupInformation.java}} was to change the order of the test cases. Without the corresponding change to {{UserGroupInformation.java}}, this modified test fails. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16277-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AAB26ECC for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16983 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16922 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16914 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:13:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02403414E2E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <844126269.1238.1308013968005.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048929#comment-13048929 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-6671: ---------------------------------------- bq. IMO it should be a separate JIRA Filed and posted a patch at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 After some more thought, I ended up going a slightly different route than "create a cleanup method." Instead, a failure to find any groups for a user created by a call to {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} will result in a follow-up call to the original {{Groups}} implementation. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16278-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:17:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D93606605 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21482 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:17:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21445 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21437 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:17:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:17:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DB1414F44 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <798012517.1243.1308014207405.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048930#comment-13048930 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482491/HADOOP-6671-g.patch against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 35 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/621//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16279-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:25:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C98506666 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29780 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:25:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29717 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29709 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:25:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:25:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:25:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D54414160 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <356309607.1268.1308014687356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048932#comment-13048932 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7384: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482315/hadoop-7384.txt against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/620//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/620//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/620//console This message is automatically generated. > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16280-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01D766C89 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37699 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37628 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37620 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650EC414418 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1172145388.1284.1308015287410.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048936#comment-13048936 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- bq. Should the access be per mbean property? The initial customers for this jira are ops querying metrics mbeans, so the per mbean size was not an issue. I agree that for things like liveNodes from the NameNodeInfo mbean, returning all the attributes of the mbean is too wasteful for mere access of lighter-weight attributes in the same mbean. Let's open a separate jira to add the get=attribute-or-pattern mechanism. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16281-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:41:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2FDE6DEB for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43510 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43479 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43471 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C47D414671 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2040224409.1310.1308015647637.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048941#comment-13048941 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7389: ------------------------------------- I don't think we need the following code anymore: {code} if (result == null) { result = new ArrayList(); } {code} right? Also, any reason that you've relocated the testLogin method? > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16282-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:41:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C11E86DFB for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43768 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43737 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43729 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4CA41466F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1572900494.1308.1308015647583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7389: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16283-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:47:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8928A6D6D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47262 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47237 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47229 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:47:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:47:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAFA41481D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1124494804.1316.1308016007372.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048943#comment-13048943 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7389: ------------------------------------- oh, now I understand: reordering the tests makes it fail. Then, fixing UGI makes it pass again. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16284-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 01:51:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BD97641E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49485 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:51:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49459 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 01:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49451 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 01:51:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:51:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:51:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE14148EF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <323064739.1322.1308016247397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048944#comment-13048944 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7389: ---------------------------------------- bq. I don't think we need the following code anymore: Perhaps, but only incidentally so because the underlying implementations of the {{Groups}} interface happen to do this themselves. I can remove it if you want, but it seems like leaving it in will only potentially be helpful. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16285-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 02:03:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AA5D6578 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56867 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56650 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56642 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:03:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617BA414C9E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2074748358.1340.1308016967396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048948#comment-13048948 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7389: ------------------------------------- well, if the underlying implementation returned null, then it would be a bug, right? In which case this behavior would be masking the bug in the underlying implementation. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16286-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 02:05:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B99E16CF4 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58660 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 02:05:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58630 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 02:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58622 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 02:05:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:05:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:05:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76329414DDC for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1420756372.1357.1308017087480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048950#comment-13048950 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7389: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482503/hadoop-7389.0.patch against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/622//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/622//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/622//console This message is automatically generated. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16287-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 03:48:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16DA665A4 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32879 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 03:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32819 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 03:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32747 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 03:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:48:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBC6414E6C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <521842997.1544.1308023267843.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048976#comment-13048976 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7144: -------------------------------------- Yes, we want to be able to query each individual property of a mbean using JMXJsonServerlet. Something like http://hostname/jmx?qry=mbeanName:property > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16288-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 04:08:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3666E6F93 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50760 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 04:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50715 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 04:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50706 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 04:08:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B4D414811 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1919599244.1598.1308024467347.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048978#comment-13048978 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7144: -------------------------------------- Suppose we can query each property of a mbean, can we return the JSON string exactly like what the mbean property function returns? This way it is consistent between querying through JMXJsonServlet and JMX itself. No additional parsing will be needed between both situations, it will just be a plug-and-play when switching back and forth. For example, {code} NameNode#getLiveNodes() {code} returns a Json string like, {noformat} "LiveNodes" : "{\"l.yahoo.com\":{\"usedSpace\":49152,\"lastContact\":2,\"adminState\":\"In Service\"},\"4.yahoo.com\":{\"usedSpace\":49152,\"lastContact\":0,\"adminState\":\"Decommissioned\"}}" {noformat} It would be helpful if the exact Json string can be returned when querying via JMXJsonServlet. If possible, can we eliminate the bean name and modelerType from the returned string like how JMXJsonServerlet is currently returning, i.e. {noformat} { "beans" : [ { "name" : "Hadoop:service=NameNode,name=NameNodeInfo", "modelerType" : "org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem", "Threads" : 34, .... {noformat} > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16289-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 05:12:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23A936C3C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85925 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 05:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85816 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 05:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85782 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 05:12:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:12:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:12:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7F24146B0 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2138740653.1648.1308028307310.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7371: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7371.patch > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16290-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 05:14:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55B206C4F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86345 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 05:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86301 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 05:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86289 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 05:14:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:14:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:14:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBBC4147D9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <723180266.1663.1308028427515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1415670632.7518.1307638679263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7371) Improve tarball distributions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048980#comment-13048980 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7371: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482496/HADOOP-7371.patch against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/623//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve tarball distributions > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7371 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Java 6, Redhat 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7371.patch > > > Hadoop release tarball contains both raw source and binary. This leads users to use the release tarball as base for applying patches, to build custom Hadoop. This is not the recommended method to develop hadoop because it leads to mixed development system where processed files and raw source are hard to separate. > To correct the problematic usage of the release tarball, the release build target should be defined as: > "ant source" generates source release tarball. > "ant binary" is binary release without source/javadoc jar files. > "ant tar" is a mirror of binary release with source/javadoc jar files. > Does this sound reasonable? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16291-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 06:41:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C20C1651F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42080 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 06:41:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41611 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 06:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41461 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 06:41:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A007D4147E2 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:40:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1762212382.1809.1308033649652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7389: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7389.1.patch Updated patch addressing Todd's comments. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch, hadoop-7389.1.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16292-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 06:55:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 133876BCD for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54259 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 06:55:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54031 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 06:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54015 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 06:55:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:55:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E02414DAF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <307910169.1853.1308034487786.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049015#comment-13049015 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7389: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482516/hadoop-7389.1.patch against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/624//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/624//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/624//console This message is automatically generated. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch, hadoop-7389.1.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16293-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 08:09:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90EBB6671 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50934 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 08:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50891 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 08:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50712 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 08:09:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:09:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:09:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F92D4153FA for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:08:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <174858604.2031.1308038928519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049051#comment-13049051 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #726 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/726/]) > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16294-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 09:03:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6676F13 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9526 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 09:03:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9494 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 09:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9486 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 09:03:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:03:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EC8415DD2 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:02:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bochun Bai (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <121270719.2122.1308042169200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6424) Port FsShell to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049067#comment-13049067 ] Bochun Bai commented on HADOOP-6424: ------------------------------------ I suggest close this issue with only FsShell.java changes. And issues blocked by this(HADOOP-6732) can start. Like HDFS-1788, we should create a serial of issues: FsShell ln: new command line to create. FsShell cp/mv/rm/cat/tail/stat: should support symlink as src and target. FsShell du: should correct size of symlink FsShell get/put: should support symlink. Is that ok? > Port FsShell to FileContext > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: John George > Attachments: HADOOP-6424.patch, HADOOP-6424.patch > > > FsShell currently uses FileSystem, needs to be moved over to FileContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16295-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:46:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D72AB6922 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38488 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38456 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38447 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFFF415587 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7390 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Thomas Graves Priority: Minor The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16296-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:46:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CAB36948 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38772 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38734 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38725 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E5C4155BE for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1355462639.2769.1308062748422.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16297-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:46:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6EB169E4 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40449 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40411 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40375 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:46:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EBE4155AC for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <35576490.2753.1308062747983.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6929.patch This patch replaces the configured security info classes with security info providers that are listed in the jar. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16298-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:52:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B80246858 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54707 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54673 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54665 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:52:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:52:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1076A415AA1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:51:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1343713583.2796.1308063110063.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7390: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Todd Lipcon > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16299-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:54:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82EE569A7 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59130 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59096 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59088 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33213415CD1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <561990583.2807.1308063228206.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7390: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16300-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:54:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D12169C9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59771 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59731 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59723 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:54:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:54:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD38415CCE for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1510299179.2804.1308063228127.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7390: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7390.txt > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16301-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 14:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 686946A33 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63539 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63504 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 14:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63496 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 14:56:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:56:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:56:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0E1415E4F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:55:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1790712289.2830.1308063348173.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049215#comment-13049215 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482554/h-6929.patch against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/625//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16302-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:04:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB4656FEA for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79000 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:04:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78957 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78949 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:04:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:04:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:04:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A041531C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1685230701.2853.1308063827677.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049219#comment-13049219 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7390: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482556/hadoop-7390.txt against trunk revision 1135333. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/626//console This message is automatically generated. > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16303-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:08:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78EE363D3 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87384 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87331 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87262 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DFD415729 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2053616919.2891.1308064067954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16304-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:08:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A788463E1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87541 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87488 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87379 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE685415725 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <33699770.2887.1308064067842.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049225#comment-13049225 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6929: ------------------------------------- I just committed HADOOP-7384 which should enable this patch to work properly. I'll re-trigger the build. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16305-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:10:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F0386444 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89168 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89047 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89038 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3F54158B1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <577319932.2911.1308064188103.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049229#comment-13049229 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482554/h-6929.patch against trunk revision 1135633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/627//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16306-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:10:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57666468 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89627 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89571 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89563 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:10:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F554158B3 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1946142326.2913.1308064188160.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049230#comment-13049230 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7390: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482556/hadoop-7390.txt against trunk revision 1135633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/628//console This message is automatically generated. > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16307-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:16:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC9446B75 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7039 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6996 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6978 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:16:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:16:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:16:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBE0415C0B for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:15:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <165844.2935.1308064550245.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049232#comment-13049232 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482554/h-6929.patch against trunk revision 1135636. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/629//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/629//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16308-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 15:28:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C71B6327 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31410 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31360 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 15:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31266 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 15:28:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:28:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83D54160CE for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:27:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <150410867.2977.1308065268882.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049236#comment-13049236 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #653 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/653/]) Amend commit of HADOOP-7384 to include svn:executable bit on smart-apply-patch.sh HADOOP-7384. Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135636 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135633 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16309-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 16:50:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C98B66543 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94548 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94520 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94512 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:50:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:50:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7932E41696D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1758858078.3231.1308070187493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1009900334.382.1308003947757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7387) Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049264#comment-13049264 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7387: ------------------------------------------ If I read the rpm_config page you referred to correctly, that specifies the behavior when a package is updated, not what happens if it is uninstalled. I'd say if a config file has been unchanged from the original installation then uninstall should actually delete the config file (you can always get it back by re-installing the package again). If a config file has been modified and differs from the version in the pacakge, it could be renamed to .rpmsave. I think it is important that uninstalling packages leaves the system as close as possible to the state it was in before the package was installed in the first place. When you want to upgrade from one version to the next you really do not want any artifacts to linger around and mess up things in an unexpected way. Specifically: Install version A, uninstall version A, install version B should be the same as: Install version B > Change rpm to ignore configuration files when uninstalling > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Minor > > When uninstalling RPM files, the config files are renamed from core-site.xml to core-site.xml.rpmsave. It would be nice if config file does not get renamed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16310-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:02:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDC726350 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15867 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:02:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15834 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:02:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15826 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:02:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:02:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:02:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F10C416D9E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1725127926.3265.1308070908451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6929.patch I forgot the two new java classes. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16311-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:04:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50C7F6D5D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23697 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23662 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23654 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0611416FE9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1185672168.3281.1308071027915.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16312-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:04:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C59846D75 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23945 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23913 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23905 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:04:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C138416FFA for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <581385121.3297.1308071028374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16313-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:16:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6A68669D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48163 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48124 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48115 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86394416595 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <232002188.3379.1308071747546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reassigned HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: issei yoshida (was: Alejandro Abdelnur) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16314-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:16:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35E3666BF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48478 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48375 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48367 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:16:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AFA4165E2 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <732127666.3445.1308071749790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049284#comment-13049284 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482567/h-6929.patch against trunk revision 1135636. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestMetricsConfig org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestMetricsSystemImpl +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/630//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/630//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/630//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16315-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:28:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E45EF6D50 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76469 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76440 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76432 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:28:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E33416CC6 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <412587682.3482.1308072467401.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049294#comment-13049294 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7390: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482556/hadoop-7390.txt against trunk revision 1135636. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/631//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/631//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/631//console This message is automatically generated. > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16316-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:46:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 918116EED for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18792 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18719 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18711 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF4E416329 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1854453348.3527.1308073547384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <9085317.460.1308004667366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7388) Remove definition of HADOOP_HOME and HADOOP_PREFIX from hadoop-env.sh.template MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7388: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7388.patch Removed HADOOP_HOME and HADOOP_PREFIX for 0.20-security branch. > Remove definition of HADOOP_HOME and HADOOP_PREFIX from hadoop-env.sh.template > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7388 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7388 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Java 6, RHEL 5.5 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7388.patch > > > The file structure layout proposed in HADOOP-6255 was designed to remove the need of using HADOOP_HOME environment to locate hadoop bits. The file structure layout should be able to map to /usr or system directories, therefore HADOOP_HOME is renamed to HADOOP_PREFIX to be more concise. HADOOP_PREFIX should not be exported to the user. If the user use hadoop-setup-single-node.sh or hadoop-setup-conf.sh to configure hadoop, the current scripts put HADOOP_PREFIX/HADOOP_HOME in hadoop-env.sh. The config template generation code should remove reference of HADOOP_PREFIX/HADOOP_HOME from hadoop-env.sh. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16317-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 17:46:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB83C6F02 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19078 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19025 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18953 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC641632E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1614827927.3532.1308073547548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049303#comment-13049303 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7390: --------------------------------------- +1 downloaded and tested patch and it works now. Thanks! > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16318-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 19:19:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF3F6D9D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94978 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:19:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94924 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94912 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 19:19:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:19:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:19:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A229A416072 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <277360745.3856.1308079127661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049351#comment-13049351 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7377: ------------------------------------ I'm uncomfortable using reflection with access permission override, to get a datum that seems like it could be fetched using provided methods such as getCommandName(). However, Daryn has convinced me that it would require a massive change of legacy code to make this better: bq. [Daryn] The CommandFactory is supposed to call setName(...) on the instance it creates, using the name fed to the factory (since commands can have more than one invokable name). setName()/getName() should be just using the instance field name. The static NAME is legacy and was not intended to remain. But Count and the DFSAdmin commands, unfortunately, use it. I intend to kill both getCommandName() and NAME, if possible, after DFSAdmin is adapted to better use the framework. Basically, the command should not know it's name, that's the factory's job, and the factory tells the command how it was conjured up. But in the meantime, NAME is needed. So, +1 on this patch. Auto-test passes except for new test, but this patch will be tested by existing DFSAdmin unit tests starting to work. I'll commit this in 24 hours to allow for other comments. Daryn, please list the exact unit tests that will be fixed by this submission. Thanks. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16319-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 19:51:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51E2F6519 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52247 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52217 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 19:51:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52209 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 19:51:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:51:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:51:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886A0416DFD for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1928332496.4012.1308081047555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7391) Copy the interrface classification documentation of HADOOP-5073 into javadoc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Copy the interrface classification documentation of HADOOP-5073 into javadoc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7391 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7391 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Fix For: 0.22.0 The documentation for interface classification in Jira Hadoop-5073 was not copied to the Javadoc of the classification. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16320-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 20:55:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66FAE664D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76736 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 20:55:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76702 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 20:55:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76694 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 20:55:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:55:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:55:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C204416EAF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:54:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <491586685.4234.1308084891046.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049409#comment-13049409 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Following up on this, Issay will update his original patch that bring hadoop-snappy into hadoop-common. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16321-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:15:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 191D96412 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12150 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:15:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12105 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:15:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12097 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:15:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:15:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:15:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6A0416B6B for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:15:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1086675387.4333.1308086100846.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049428#comment-13049428 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7381: --------------------------------------------- Let's keep description small. This looks like a good thing to have. I'd recommend to commit this to trunk as well. > FindBugs OutOfMemoryError > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7381 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7381.patch > > > When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. > The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. > We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). > This is the error I get: > findbugs: > [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs > [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task > [findbugs] Running FindBugs... > [findbugs] Out of memory > [findbugs] Total memory: 477M > [findbugs] free memory: 62M > [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar > ... > [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) > [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) > ...15 more > [findbugs] Java Result: 1 > [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html > [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl > [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. > [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml > BUILD FAILED > /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) > at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > ... 15 more > Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) > ... 20 more > Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) > at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) > ... 21 more > --------- > etc.etc. > Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds > Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... > CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. > [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE > [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16322-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:19:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0609C64A8 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15962 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:19:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15903 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:19:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15885 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:19:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:19:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:19:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69861416CEF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <192001893.4337.1308086327429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049429#comment-13049429 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7377: ------------------------------------- This patch fixes all of the failing negative tests for {{DFSAdmin}} in {{TestHDFSCLI}}. As of build #777, the negative {{DFSAdmin}} tests are the only tests that are failing in {{TestHDFSCLI}}. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16323-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:49:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A95796E08 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97761 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97726 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97718 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B3D416DC8 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7392 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Tanping Wang Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName#property to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16324-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:49:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B88096F4C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99978 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99844 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99733 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2273416DD0 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1913857146.4454.1308088127661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7393) PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7393 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Matt Foley PathData#string stores the pathstring originally used to construct the Path, and returns it from various methods, apparently in an attempt to improve the user experience for the shell. However, the current working directory may change, and if so this string value becomes meaningless and/or incorrect in context. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16325-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:49:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C246F68 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 215 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99971 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99753 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:49:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:49:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4484416DD5 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1022113332.4459.1308088127801.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1913857146.4454.1308088127661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7393) PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049452#comment-13049452 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7393: ------------------------------------ Three solutions might be valid: # Like Path, convert the pathstring to an absolute pathstring. If it is desired to give the user an fs pathstring instead of URI as used by Path, then convert the relative fs pathstring into an absolute fs pathstring, and store that. # Store the absolute path (or Path) of the CWD at instantiation time. When #string is referenced, compare the current WD to the stored WD, and if they differ, convert #string to an absolute stringpath wrt the stored WD. # Don't store #string. Like Path, discard the pathstring after instantiation. If needed later, return Path#uri. > PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7393 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > > PathData#string stores the pathstring originally used to construct the Path, and returns it from various methods, apparently in an attempt to improve the user experience for the shell. > However, the current working directory may change, and if so this string value becomes meaningless and/or incorrect in context. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16326-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:53:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD39C60D1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14752 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14662 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14654 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71073416FDA for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <815018880.4473.1308088367459.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: Tanping Wang > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName#property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16327-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:55:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 965046130 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18654 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18618 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:55:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18610 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:55:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:55:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609F1416168 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:54:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1633698435.4538.1308088488392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7389: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks, Aaron. > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch, hadoop-7389.1.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16328-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 21:57:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3FFE62E1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21646 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21608 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 21:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21600 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 21:57:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:57:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:57:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF1B41621B for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1922662521.4541.1308088607373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049459#comment-13049459 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7144: -------------------------------------- created HADOOP-7392 to implement querying per mbean property. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16329-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:05:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94B946A23 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35409 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35329 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35321 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:05:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:05:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:05:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DC5416519 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <509141358.4568.1308089087757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <389414663.13212.1307766119073.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7381) FindBugs OutOfMemoryError MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joep Rottinghuis updated HADOOP-7381: ------------------------------------- Description: When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). was: When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). This is the error I get: findbugs: [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task [findbugs] Running FindBugs... [findbugs] Out of memory [findbugs] Total memory: 477M [findbugs] free memory: 62M [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar ... [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) ...15 more [findbugs] Java Result: 1 [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml BUILD FAILED /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) ... 15 more Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) ... 20 more Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) ... 21 more --------- etc.etc. Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE Will look to see if a different patch is needed for trunk. Moving exception stack to a comment to keep description short. This is the error I get: findbugs: [mkdir] Created dir: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task [findbugs] Running FindBugs... [findbugs] Out of memory [findbugs] Total memory: 477M [findbugs] free memory: 62M [findbugs] Analyzed: /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/hadoop-core-0.20.security-test-3.jar ... [findbugs] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushBySignature(OpcodeStack.java:2589) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.pushByInvoke(OpcodeStack.java:2565) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.processMethodCall(OpcodeStack.java:2011) [findbugs] at edu.umd.cs.findbugs.OpcodeStack.sawOpcode(OpcodeStack.java:1574) ...15 more [findbugs] Java Result: 1 [findbugs] Output saved to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml [xslt] Processing /hadoop01/jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml to /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.html [xslt] Loading stylesheet /usr/local/findbugs/src/xsl/default.xsl [xslt] : Error! Premature end of file. [xslt] : Error! com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. [xslt] Failed to process /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml BUILD FAILED /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build.xml:1164: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:720) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:313) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.TraXLiaison.transform(TraXLiaison.java:194) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.process(XSLTProcess.java:852) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.XSLTProcess.execute(XSLTProcess.java:388) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) ... 15 more Caused by: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:547) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:710) ... 20 more Caused by: com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.utils.WrappedRuntimeException: Premature end of file. at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:446) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.dom.XSLTCDTMManager.getDTM(XSLTCDTMManager.java:234) at com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.getDOM(TransformerImpl.java:525) ... 21 more --------- etc.etc. Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure [CHECKSTYLE] Collecting checkstyle analysis files... CHECKSTYLESuccessfully parsed file /.../jenkins/jobs/hadoop-common-test-smoke/workspace/build/test/checkstyle-errors.xml of module with 13525 warnings. [FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE [WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE > FindBugs OutOfMemoryError > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7381 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7381 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Environment: FindBugs 1.3.9, ant 1.8.2, RHEL6, Jenkins 1.414 in Tomcat 7.0.14, Sun Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode) > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Joep Rottinghuis > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7381.patch > > > When running the findbugs target from Jenkins, I get an OutOfMemory error. > The "effort" in FindBugs is set to Max which ends up using a lot of memory to go through all the classes. The jvmargs passed to FindBugs is hardcoded to 512 MB max. > We can leave the default to 512M, as long as we pass this as an ant parameter which can be overwritten in individual cases through -D, or in the build.properties file (either basedir, or user's home directory). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16330-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:07:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 649CE6ACC for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42809 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42766 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42758 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B2241665D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1984521321.4585.1308089208208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6929.patch Fix the metrics testcase that was using a hardcoded build/classes path name. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16331-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:07:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89F106ADD for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43109 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43080 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43064 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4095416670 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1436774551.4603.1308089208734.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16332-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:07:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B8C56AE6 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43161 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43082 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43065 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:07:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600B41666E for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <883586894.4601.1308089208676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16333-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:11:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA1CA6BD7 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51637 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51605 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51597 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:11:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:11:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8704168A9 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <608995701.4635.1308089447826.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049467#comment-13049467 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7360: ------------------------------------ TestPathData: Multiple places: The preferred way to express "new Path(testDir+"/d1")" is "new Path(testDir, "d1")". This avoids hard-coding the path delimiter for a local filesystem path. initialize(): * Consider "fs.createNewFile(Path)" instead of "fs.create(Path).close()" * If you put the "setWorkingDirectory" command near the beginning of the method, wouldn't all the creates and mkdirs get simpler? I'm concerned that testDir is a relative path. Can you convert it to an absolute path as early in the process as possible, before anyone might have set a non-default working directory? Why did you remove testWithFsAndPath()? It is not a null test. getParent() should be named testGetParent(). testRelativeGlobBack(): see previous concern about making "testDir" absolute before interacting with second and later setWorkingDirectory() invocations. This might give you testDir/testDir/d1 ? PathData: Agree with your elimination of PathData(FileSystem, Path, FileStatus), but suggest also eliminating PathData(FileSystem, String, FileStatus) and PathData(FileSystem, FileStatus). Basically, the status should be looked up in the FS, not set as an argument. Should do so at the end of method PathData(FileSystem, String). In comment for PathData(FileSystem, String), remove "Convenience" adjective. It becomes the primary ctor. setStat(boolean ignoreFNF) is counter-intuitive. Most people seeing "setStat(boolean)" will assume the status is being set to the argument. Please call it lookupStatus(boolean ignoreFNF). Or could use two methods, both with zero arguments, called setStat() and setStatIgnoreFNF(). Suggest letting lookupStatus(ignoreFNF) return the stat value instead of void. Then refreshStatus just becomes "return lookupStatus(false);". getChecksumFile(): Why is this method needed (returns PathData), vs just using Fs.getChecksumFile() (returns Path)? getParent(): Several concerns: * Why is this method needed instead of just using Path.getParent()? There are currently no callers of this new method. * Why is it important to preserve the relative-ness of the parent path? Trying to do so exposes you to serious issues because the current working directory may have changed since PathData#string was stored, which means the value returned by this method could be meaningless if string was relative. I think I would go so far as to say this can't work. I would much rather let Path.getParent() do what it was carefully implemented to do. * The same issue applies to the next two chunks. This brings up the issue of why PathData saves the value of #string? This just begs for such mis-use. I've opened HADOOP-7393 for this. > FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7360 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7360.patch > > > FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16334-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:17:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1860D6477 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60521 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60487 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60477 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B661A416AFC for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2018682955.4642.1308089807743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <272967917.1210.1308013607392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7389) Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049469#comment-13049469 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7389: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #17 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/17/]) HADOOP-7389. Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135820 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/security/TestUserGroupInformation.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > Use of TestingGroups by tests causes subsequent tests to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7389 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7389 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7389.0.patch, hadoop-7389.1.patch > > > As mentioned in HADOOP-6671, {{UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(...)}} manipulates static state which can cause test cases which are run after a call to this function to fail. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16336-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:17:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB2C6496 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60824 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60754 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60738 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0E2416B0A for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <642332564.4656.1308089808238.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049471#comment-13049471 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #17 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/17/]) > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch, hadoop-6605-3.patch, hadoop-6605-4.patch, hadoop-6605-5.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16335-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:17:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D788664A0 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60825 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60751 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60676 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:17:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E263F416B01 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <314357923.4647.1308089807923.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049470#comment-13049470 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #17 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/17/]) Amend commit of HADOOP-7384 to include svn:executable bit on smart-apply-patch.sh HADOOP-7384. Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135636 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135633 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16337-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:25:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12DB2647C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73468 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:25:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73429 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73416 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:25:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:25:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:25:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4A141601C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <592503529.4675.1308090287382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049478#comment-13049478 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6929: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482605/h-6929.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 10 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/632//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/632//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/632//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16338-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:53:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 264196732 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16545 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16456 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16344 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:53:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:53:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72310416E65 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <295892337.4779.1308091967464.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7385: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7385-1.patch Attaching the patch. > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16339-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 22:55:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83772676F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17602 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17474 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 22:55:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17424 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 22:55:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:55:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3539F416FD1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:54:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1052250844.4787.1308092088214.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7380: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7380.0.patch Here's a first hack at the Common portion of client failover, not intended for commit. If people think this approach is roughly sound I'll fix it up and prepare it for commit. It still needs at least the following work: * A way to mark certain interface methods as idempotent (and thus should be retried upon failover). This will probably take the form of a method annotation. * Refinement of the precise set of exceptions to deal with. * Potential refinement of the {{FailoverProxyProvider}} interface. I'm not in love with it as it stands. I've also created a test which uses this code to actually perform a failover between two federated NNs (which happen to have the same FS metadata) by starting them both up, creating a file in each at the same path, shutting down one, and ensuring the DFSClient properly fails over to the second. I can post that patch on HDFS-1973 but it depends on this patch. > Common portion of HDFS-1973 > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7380.0.patch > > > Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16340-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:23:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6A2F68A6 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49449 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:23:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49404 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49396 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFDF416BE1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <829078509.4909.1308093767369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1913857146.4454.1308088127661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7393) PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049509#comment-13049509 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7393: ------------------------------------- As currently designed/implemented, I feel the premise of this jira is invalid, however I do understand the sentiment. The PathData object is only intended for internal use in FsShell. The cwd does not change during the execution of any of the commands, so the relative path is not invalidated. bq. Like Path, convert the pathstring to an absolute pathstring. [...] bq. Don't store #string. [...] This would unravel the benefit. The intent of storing the string is that what you give it is +exactly+ what you get back, just like a unix shell, not a path that has been mangled. If you were to take the old FsShell and feed it an arbitrary path, you would have a hard time reliably matching the path in the output. bq. Store the absolute path (or Path) of the CWD at instantiation time. When #string is referenced, compare the current WD to the stored WD, and if they differ, convert #string to an absolute stringpath wrt the stored WD. I would put forth the opinion that PathData is currently doing the "right thing": relative paths are invalidated when pwd changes. At a normal shell, if you were to type {{x=foo.txt}}, {{cat $x}}, {{cd somewhere-else}}, and again {{cat $x}}, you certainly wouldn't expect the original {{foo.txt}} to be displayed. If the desire is to use PathData outside of FsShell, I could probably be swayed from this position. My goal has been for FsShell to act and feel just like a real shell. That said, I do welcome a response. > PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7393 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > > PathData#string stores the pathstring originally used to construct the Path, and returns it from various methods, apparently in an attempt to improve the user experience for the shell. > However, the current working directory may change, and if so this string value becomes meaningless and/or incorrect in context. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16341-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:29:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C293A6A74 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55481 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55473 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63859416E2F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ian Holsman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <284169479.4914.1308094127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049510#comment-13049510 ] Ian Holsman commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- mailer-conf.diff has been applied. revision: 790962. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16342-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D1056042 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56801 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56762 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56753 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:31:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB0E416F99 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <589876698.4966.1308094248188.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671-h.patch Wiring Clover. The following property in the pom.xml may have to set to the correct value in the Jenkins servers: ${user.home}/.clover.license Build commands avail: * Clean : mvn clean * Compile : mvn compile * Run tests : mvn test * Create JAR : mvn package * Run findbugs : mvn package -DrunFindbugs * Run checkstyle : mvn checkstyle:checkstyle * TAR wo/docs & wo/source : mvn package -DmakeTar * TAR w/docs & w/source : mvn package -DmakeTar -DgenerateDocs -DincludeSource * TAR w/source only : mvn assembly:single -Dsource * Install in local M2 cache : mvn install * Deploy to Maven repo : mvn deploy * Run clover : mvn test -DrunClover > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16343-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:33:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EB6D6A24 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59911 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59884 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59876 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:33:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:33:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:33:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2549D41613F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <891308148.5025.1308094369149.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7020: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop.JPG Here's a proposal for consideration kindly contributed by Stephanie Davidson. I like it because it's quite visually distinct from the project logo, but obviously sticks with the yellow elephant and cartoony theme. I also like this one since it sticks with the color theme of the logos so far associated with the project. It's also the only logo so far proposed in which the elephant is clearly powering something. :) > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, hadoop.JPG, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16344-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 14 23:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3772160D1 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64686 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64650 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64613 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636114161E2 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1058799296.5030.1308094487403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049519#comment-13049519 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482623/HADOOP-6671-h.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 38 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/633//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16345-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:37:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54379615B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29586 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:37:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29556 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29548 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:37:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:37:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5711D417648 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1790031637.5219.1308098207353.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049546#comment-13049546 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7360: ------------------------------------- I can address the test points. One question: If I need to construct a path of {{testdir+"/d1/f1"}}, is this the preferred way: {{new Path(new Path(testDir, "d1"), "f1")}}? bq. Why did you remove testWithFsAndPath() It's private now. bq. [...] suggest also eliminating PathData(FileSystem, String, FileStatus) and PathData(FileSystem, FileStatus). Basically, the status should be looked up in the FS, not set as an argument. {{PathData(FileSystem, FileStatus)}} was removed in the patch. Did you mean something else? It would be a very bad idea to remove the method {{PathData(FileSystem, String, FileStatus)}}. It's private, and only used in cases like listStatus/globStatus where the result is an array of {{FileStatus}}. It's used to avoid an unnecessary re-stat of the path -- overall, this class has drastically reduced the unnecessary re-stats occurring in FsShell. bq. PathData(FileSystem, String) [...] becomes the primary ctor. {{PathData(FileSystem,String,FileStatus)}} is the primary ctor because a) removing it will cause 2X the stats, b) it extracts path from a non-null status. The path is a final, so I can't invoke {{super(FileSystem, String)}} and then reset the path. bq. setStat(boolean ignoreFNF) is counter-intuitive. [...] Please call it lookupStatus(boolean ignoreFNF) [...] 100% agreed! I'm actually surprised I did that... Either I was lacking coffee, or slipped up an eclipse refactor... bq. getChecksumFile(): Why is this method needed (returns PathData), vs just using Fs.getChecksumFile() (returns Path)? There's another change backed up behind this one that drastically simplifies the copy commands to operate purely on PathData (which incidentally will further reduce stats, but that's not the primary purpose). Since {{PathData(FileSystem,String)}} is now private, I had to push it into PathData, else I have to re-expose the private ctor which will complicate the switch to {{FileContext}}. Since commands aren't storing the fs in temporaries, it may be possible to just switch fs to a FileContext and generally have everything work. Having a command monkeying around getting a raw fs for the crc file and then instantiating thru what what should be a private ctor is a minor setback. bq. Why is this method needed instead of just using Path.getParent()? There are currently no callers of this new method. There are backed up changes that depend on it (I didn't expect this jira to languish...). Remember that everything is operating on PathData, so I can't use Path.getParent() because I'd have to re-expose a private ctor. The other questions doubting the need for relativity are addressed on the jira you filed. My design goal has been to mimic a unix shell. bq. This just begs for such mis-use I think computer users are well enough acquainted with filesystems to know that if you change the pwd, then relative paths are no longer valid. > FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7360 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7360.patch > > > FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16346-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:47:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B78CC66D1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45522 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45494 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45486 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:47:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F54178AE for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1574411268.5244.1308098807395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049548#comment-13049548 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- I updated https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/ to generate Clover reports. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16347-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:53:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B09936E54 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51969 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:53:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51786 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51770 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:53:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:53:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B93D417A0B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:52:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <141353966.5294.1308099168306.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049549#comment-13049549 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------------- Jenkins paths need to be updated. Both PreCommit-HDFS-Build and PreCommit-MAPREDUCE-Build are failing. Other builds are probably affected as well. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16348-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 00:57:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 356066F1C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55728 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:57:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55692 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 00:57:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55684 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 00:57:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:57:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:57:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCA3417B5C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:56:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1918591724.5337.1308099409905.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049551#comment-13049551 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- Fixed the precommit builds and resubmitted all of the patches that had failed due to the problem. I did all of the other builds, but somehow missed these. Sorry about that! > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16349-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 01:15:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF14D694E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66609 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66571 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66563 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8659A41615A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <215762644.5417.1308100488547.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049558#comment-13049558 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------------- Thanks, Tom! > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16350-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 01:15:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37F9695F for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66864 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66837 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66829 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 01:15:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:15:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EBA416181 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 01:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1801087231.5443.1308100489426.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049559#comment-13049559 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------------- Oops, I meant Todd ;-) > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16351-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:13:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBD754205 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22397 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22371 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22357 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:13:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:13:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:13:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61746417645 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <639440876.5515.1308103967395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7394) Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7394 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Priority: Minor Running {{ant cn-docs}} with Forrest 0.8 will work. Running the same thing with Forrest 0.9 prints the following error: {noformat} Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/messaging/MessageHandler at org.apache.cocoon.serialization.FOPSerializer.configure(FOPSerializer.java:122) at org.apache.avalon.framework.container.ContainerUtil.configure(ContainerUtil.java:201) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.DefaultComponentFactory.newInstance(DefaultComponentFactory.java:289) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.newPoolable(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:655) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.get(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:371) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.PoolableComponentHandler.doGet(PoolableComponentHandler.java:198) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ComponentHandler.get(ComponentHandler.java:381) at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ExcaliburComponentSelector.select(ExcaliburComponentSelector.java:215) at org.apache.cocoon.components.ExtendedComponentSelector.select(ExtendedComponentSelector.java:268) at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.AbstractProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractProcessingPipeline.java:311) at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java:171) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SerializeNode.invoke(SerializeNode.java:120) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:103) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:47) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PreparableMatchNode.invoke(PreparableMatchNode.java:131) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.MountNode.invoke(MountNode.java:118) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:98) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.process(Cocoon.java:699) at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonWrapper.getPage(CocoonWrapper.java:514) at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.processTarget(CocoonBean.java:499) at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.process(CocoonBean.java:356) at org.apache.cocoon.Main.main(Main.java:321) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.fop.messaging.MessageHandler at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) ... 38 more {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16352-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:49:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B1B24B94 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49154 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:49:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49127 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:49:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49117 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:49:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:49:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:49:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F8D4170CA for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bochun Bai (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <550642264.5557.1308106127398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6424) Port FsShell to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bochun Bai updated HADOOP-6424: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Port FsShell to FileContext > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: John George > Attachments: HADOOP-6424.patch, HADOOP-6424.patch > > > FsShell currently uses FileSystem, needs to be moved over to FileContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16353-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:51:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B39744BC1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49877 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49778 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:51:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49764 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:51:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:51:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:51:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785074171A3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1501186456.5568.1308106247489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] issei yoshida updated HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206-002.patch update for the latest Hadoop trunk and change the compression overhead. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 02:59:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28B464DB9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57407 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57365 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 02:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57346 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 02:59:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:59:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:59:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FF2417397 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1327126460.5619.1308106728160.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049586#comment-13049586 ] issei yoshida commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- I updated the patch for the latest Hadoop trunk. I would like to hear your advice. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 04:22:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C10044DAD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10491 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:22:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10257 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10249 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 04:22:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:22:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD2541795D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <391333450.5757.1308111707651.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049602#comment-13049602 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482633/HADOOP-7206-002.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/634//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/634//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/634//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 04:40:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65A8F452C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19470 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19441 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19426 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 04:40:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:40:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0C9417D31 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sudharsan Sampath (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <317000789.5820.1308112787373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049604#comment-13049604 ] Sudharsan Sampath commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------- Just my thoughts... To me throwing a specific exception would be better. The checkSerializerSpecs attempts to see if we can initialise a new instance of the serializer/deserializer from the jvm where the job is submitted. How does it guarantee that the libs/jars from which these classes are loaded are available for the jvm that executes the job or vice versa? Even if this methods succeeds isn't there a chance then the original problem might occur due to the libs missing from the actual jvm that executes the job? > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 05:48:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B954932 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54061 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53839 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53818 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 05:48:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:48:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:48:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674FD417E16 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yan Jinshuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7395 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Yan Jinshuang Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.20.3 When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 05:50:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B5FB4A11 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56027 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:50:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55868 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 05:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55748 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 05:50:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:50:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:50:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A70A417F05 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yan Jinshuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1659840147.5880.1308116987367.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yan Jinshuang updated HADOOP-7395: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.3) 0.23.0 > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 07:54:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 217A946AD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86271 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 07:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86136 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 07:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86092 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 07:54:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:54:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:54:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D60341747D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yan Jinshuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1022068843.6096.1308124428641.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7396) The information returned by the wrong usage of the command "hadoop job -events <#-of-events>" is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The information returned by the wrong usage of the command "hadoop job -events <#-of-events>" is not appropriate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7396 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7396 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Yan Jinshuang Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 With wrong value of from-event-# and #-of-events, though the from-events-# after the #-of-events for example from 1000 to 1, the command always return 0.It is expected to show detailed information, like "the start number should be less than the end number for range of events". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 08:41:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5C2041E6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33155 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 08:41:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33116 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 08:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33108 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 08:41:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1BA417998 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1220977770.6186.1308127247443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7380: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7380.1.patch Updated patch which adds support for marking interface methods as being idempotent. Again, not intended for commit just yet. I also updated the DFSClient failover test case to ensure it works with this annotation facility, which it does. > Common portion of HDFS-1973 > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7380.0.patch, hadoop-7380.1.patch > > > Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 09:43:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AB9A4EF2 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19413 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:43:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19371 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 09:43:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 09:43:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:43:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BA4417C3A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <295795785.6343.1308130968921.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049696#comment-13049696 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482633/HADOOP-7206-002.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/638//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/638//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/638//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 15:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D364F3C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80346 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80311 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 15:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80303 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 15:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:56:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE994193B9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Fines (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <149464743.7145.1308153347389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7397) Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7397 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Environment: Any Reporter: Scott Fines Priority: Minor If the NameNode is not available (in, for example, a network partition event separating the client from the NameNode), and an attempt is made to connect, then the FileSystem api will *eventually* timeout and throw an error. However, that timeout is currently hardcoded to be 20 seconds to connect, with 45 retries, for a total of a 15 minute wait before failure. While in many circumstances this is fine, there are also many circumstances (such as booting a service) where both the connection timeout and the number of retries should be significantly less, so as not to harm availability of other services. Investigating Client.java, I see that there are two fields in Connection: maxRetries and rpcTimeout. I propose either re-using those fields for initiating the connection as well; alternatively, using the already existing dfs.socket.timeout parameter to set the connection timeout on initialization, and potentially adding a new field such as dfs.connection.retries with a default of 45 to replicate current behaviors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 513CE41BB for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77281 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77254 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77245 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F120C419D6E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <912662184.7454.1308157547983.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049884#comment-13049884 ] Mahadev konar commented on HADOOP-6929: --------------------------------------- +1 the patch looks good. Ill run through some hdfs tests just to make sure everything is all fine and then commit. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E06541CF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77513 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77439 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77275 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2259419DB5 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <399425902.7513.1308157549988.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6424) Port FsShell to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049886#comment-13049886 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6424: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482156/HADOOP-6424.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/641//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/641//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/641//console This message is automatically generated. > Port FsShell to FileContext > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: John George > Attachments: HADOOP-6424.patch, HADOOP-6424.patch > > > FsShell currently uses FileSystem, needs to be moved over to FileContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F156D41D9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77806 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77753 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77508 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:06:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A75419D73 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:05:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1152975400.7458.1308157548097.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049885#comment-13049885 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482633/HADOOP-7206-002.patch against trunk revision 1135820. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/640//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/640//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/640//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:10:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E40E4415 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89612 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89584 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89574 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C493419110 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <13372167.7547.1308157788308.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049891#comment-13049891 ] Jeffrey Naisbitt commented on HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------------ I'm not sure why I don't see test-patch results, but here are the results from a manual run: [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:10:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E96D4438 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90082 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90051 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90043 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A51E419132 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1764643332.7573.1308157791563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049892#comment-13049892 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #728 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/728/]) HADOOP-7106. Reorganize SVN layout to combine HDFS, Common, and MR in a single tree (project unsplit) todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1134994 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/trunk/conf * /hadoop/common/site/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/site/author * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common * /hadoop/zookeeper * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073/common * /hadoop/pig * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-265/src/test * /hadoop/site/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/site/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/src * /hadoop/common/trunk/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/site/main/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/conf * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-265 * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/hdfs * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/README.txt * /hadoop/common/site/common/author/src/documentation * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/MAPREDUCE-233 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/bin * /hadoop/common/trunk/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/lib * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/site/publish * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/src * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/lib * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1052 * /hadoop/common/site/common/publish * /hadoop/common/site/common * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073/hdfs * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/site/publish * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/site/hdfs/author/src/documentation * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/src * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/lib * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src * /hadoop/common/site/main/author * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/bin * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/src * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-326 * /hadoop/hive * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/conf * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/conf * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/src * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-326/src/test * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/README.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/src * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/conf * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/ivy * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/hdfs * /hadoop/common/trunk/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/ivy * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/site/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/src * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/trunk/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/site/common/publish/docs * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279 * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/bin * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/ivy * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/src * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/trunk/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/ivy * /hadoop/common/trunk/common * /hadoop/common/site/common/author * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/README.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/common * /hadoop/site/author * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/MAPREDUCE-233/src/test * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/src * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1073/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/build.xml * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/bin * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/hdfs/src/test * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/conf * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/HDFS-1052/src/test * /hadoop/common/site/mapreduce * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/ivy * /hadoop/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/hdfs * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/lib * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/bin * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/.eclipse.templates * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/README.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/hdfs * /hadoop/common/site/mapreduce/author/src/documentation * /hadoop/common/branches/MR-279/mapreduce/src/test * /hadoop/common/site/main/publish * /hadoop/common/site/main * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/build.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/common/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/tags/release-0.21.0/common/LICENSE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21-old/NOTICE.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/common/.gitignore * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/common/bin * /hadoop/common/trunk/hdfs/src/test > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:10:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1908445A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91196 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91135 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91087 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:10:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:10:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA35419136 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1826709279.7577.1308157791773.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049893#comment-13049893 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #728 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/728/]) Amend commit of HADOOP-7384 to include svn:executable bit on smart-apply-patch.sh HADOOP-7384. Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135636 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1135633 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:14:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB3D6456D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97563 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97536 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97528 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:14:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:14:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757F1419313 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1436217384.7589.1308158027478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-3436) Useless synchronized in JobTracker MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-3436. ----------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem Does not appear to be a problem w.r.t. trunk. There is no such variable held (a collection is used instead, and that requires to hold JT lock and is synchronized (per comments)). Resolving as "Not a problem" (anymore). Stale issue. > Useless synchronized in JobTracker > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Brice Arnould > Assignee: Brice Arnould > Priority: Trivial > > In the original code, numTaskTrackers is fetch in a synchronized way, which is useless because anyway it might be change during the running of the algorithm. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:16:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8960A48A4 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1425 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1387 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1379 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:16:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:16:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3B3419402 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755648041.7591.1308158147378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7297: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.203.1 Status: Open (was: Patch Available) (Cancelling patch, needs more removals) > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:18:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFA7442AF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3244 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3209 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3196 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:18:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:18:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF0F419587 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1876955507.7606.1308158267631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1812341271.10485.1300405469738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7198) Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049900#comment-13049900 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7198: --------------------------------- I guess we could make a documentation note at most for this. Do you have any other ideas in mind? > Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7198 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7198 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > > It turns out (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range) that when you bind to port 0, Linux chooses an ephemeral port. On my default-ridden Ubuntu Maverick box and on CentOS 5.5, that range is 32768-61000. So, when HBase binds to 60030 or when mapReduce binds to 50070, there's a small chance that you'll conflict with, say, an FTP session, or with some other Hadoop daemon that's had a listening address configured as :0. > I don't know that there's a practical resolution here, since changing the defaults seems like an ill-fated effort, but if you have any ephemeral port use, you can run into this. We've now run into it once. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:34:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FC8544E8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28546 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28494 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28477 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:34:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9F9419C76 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <133442052.7638.1308159227716.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <149464743.7145.1308153347389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7397) Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7397: ----------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 This also appears to affect trunk. > Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7397 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Environment: Any > Reporter: Scott Fines > Priority: Minor > Labels: hadoop > > If the NameNode is not available (in, for example, a network partition event separating the client from the NameNode), and an attempt is made to connect, then the FileSystem api will *eventually* timeout and throw an error. However, that timeout is currently hardcoded to be 20 seconds to connect, with 45 retries, for a total of a 15 minute wait before failure. While in many circumstances this is fine, there are also many circumstances (such as booting a service) where both the connection timeout and the number of retries should be significantly less, so as not to harm availability of other services. > Investigating Client.java, I see that there are two fields in Connection: maxRetries and rpcTimeout. I propose either re-using those fields for initiating the connection as well; alternatively, using the already existing dfs.socket.timeout parameter to set the connection timeout on initialization, and potentially adding a new field such as dfs.connection.retries with a default of 45 to replicate current behaviors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16373-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 17:38:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0F994857 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42791 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42741 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42731 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:38:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7601419E66 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <709933421.7669.1308159467944.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-7106. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I think all the pieces of this are complete now, so marking resolved. Thanks to the many people who contributed: Nigel, Owen, Doug, Ian, Jukka, etc. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 18:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 132D14026 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53660 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:31:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53628 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 18:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53620 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 18:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:31:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD96B4192A8 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1162241110.7961.1308162647772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049939#comment-13049939 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7377: ------------------------------------ This patch needs to be rebased for trunk. > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 19:11:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C070C4BDA for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66588 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:11:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66547 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:11:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66538 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:11:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:11:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:11:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDDA419AD3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2076503973.8161.1308165047373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1913857146.4454.1308088127661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7393) PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049966#comment-13049966 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7393: ------------------------------------ Option 2 seems like the only viable approach, then. I'll agree that getDirectoryContents() works correctly in that regards. getPathDataForChild() doesn't seem to. Nor do I see general logic that invalidates relative paths when the cwd does change, except maybe in the relativize() method. I also have to point out that (a) all the PathData i/f methods are public, not package-private; (b) code always gets re-used for purposes not expected by the author, and (c) the fact that set/getWorkingDirectory methods exist mean that you can't reasonably expect them to never be called between two calls to PathData references. So will you humor me to the following extent? Save 'cwd' at instantiation time, either as a Path or an absolute pathstring. Provide a method 'String getOrigPathString()' which checks getWorkingDirectory against cwd, and returns 'string' if same, or something derived from 'cwd' + 'string' otherwise. Then comment out the wazoo that 'string' must never be accessed directly, but always via the getOrigPathString() method. And do it that way internally in all PathData methods too. Would that be acceptable? getWorkingDirectory() should only access in-memory data structures, so it shouldn't be a big cost. > PathData saves original string value, inviting failure when CWD changes > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7393 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7393 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > > PathData#string stores the pathstring originally used to construct the Path, and returns it from various methods, apparently in an attempt to improve the user experience for the shell. > However, the current working directory may change, and if so this string value becomes meaningless and/or incorrect in context. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 19:18:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45FA74992 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79700 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79661 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 19:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79653 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 19:18:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:18:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:18:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4D419DBC for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1905403412.8171.1308165467422.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <92042485.70969.1307347427375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7360) FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049967#comment-13049967 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7360: ------------------------------------ bq. It would be a very bad idea to remove the method PathData(FileSystem, String, FileStatus) ... avoid unnecessary re-stat of the path ... Understood. As long as it's private, that's fine. Please comment it as being for that use. Ok to the rest of the responses. Comments on how to make relativity safe are in HDFS-7393. Thanks, Daryn. > FsShell does not preserve relative paths with globs > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7360 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7360 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7360.patch > > > FsShell currently preserves relative paths that do not contain globs. Unfortunately the method {{fs.globStatus()}} is fully qualifying all returned paths. This is causing inconsistent display of paths. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 21:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC58A4731 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23622 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 21:31:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23601 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 21:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23593 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 21:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:31:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19DD419979 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <419988067.8514.1308173447658.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Going to try using java.net.URI instead of UrlValidator to get rid of all the extra dependency stuff. > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 21:53:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2649246C6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56300 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 21:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56265 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 21:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56257 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 21:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5FE41AC12 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1488695307.8613.1308174767845.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050060#comment-13050060 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7379: ------------------------------------- What do you guys think, is this a reasonable path? > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27AD04099 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81007 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:13:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80967 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80950 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A4641A4D9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1632789821.8685.1308175967613.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050075#comment-13050075 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7379: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:19:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20EA14421 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88271 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:19:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88243 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88235 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:19:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:19:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:19:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0BB41A663 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1185954194.8694.1308176327369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7390: ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 - worked like a charm. I've just committed this. Thanks a lot, Todd. > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:23:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E99C49DE for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94048 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:23:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93946 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93797 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAA941A7D9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <204819857.8708.1308176567765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Protocol buffer-generated types may now be used as arguments or return values for Hadoop RPC. Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks for reviewing, Luke! I haven't marked this as an incompatible change, since it simply adds a new feature to ObjectWritable without changing encoding of any existing features. > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:27:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 052334AB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 194 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 134 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 125 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04E441A943 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1807388231.8723.1308176807784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6732) Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-6732: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > When listing a large directory from the command line using the default heap configuration, FsShell often runs out of memory. This is because all stats of the entries under the directory need to be in memory before printing them. The new API listStatus that returns an iterator of FileStatus, which implemented in HDFS-1091, no longer requires that all entries are fetched first. Thus switching to this new API will greatly improve the use of heap space. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:27:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 336464AB9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 364 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 302 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 159 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:27:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA7341A945 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1323421461.8725.1308176807839.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7377: ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) No it doesn't need to be rebased. Committed to trunk. Thanks, Daryn! > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:29:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C7B4B0B for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3617 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3581 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3573 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FC241AA07 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1289206768.8728.1308176927353.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6732) Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050084#comment-13050084 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6732: ------------------------------------- The PathData changes to FsShell have reduced the RPC load on the NN, but at the expense of a few more objects per path. Adding iterators will negate the additional memory pressure. > Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6732 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6732 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > When listing a large directory from the command line using the default heap configuration, FsShell often runs out of memory. This is because all stats of the entries under the directory need to be in memory before printing them. The new API listStatus that returns an iterator of FileStatus, which implemented in HDFS-1091, no longer requires that all entries are fetched first. Thus switching to this new API will greatly improve the use of heap space. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:37:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F6494221 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11510 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:37:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11436 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11420 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:37:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:37:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625C441ADAA for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <738025072.8753.1308177407399.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050087#comment-13050087 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7390: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #656 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/656/]) HADOOP-7390. VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit. (todd via atm) atm : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1136220 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/saveVersion.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:39:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5965942BC for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14911 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14824 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14807 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:39:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:39:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569E041AE79 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7398 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:51:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F1CA4C4E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42130 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42046 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42038 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14CA41A554 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1556987777.8912.1308178247723.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050100#comment-13050100 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7377: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #657 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/657/]) HADOOP-7377. Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. mattf : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1136223 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Command.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 22:51:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07D194C67 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42394 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42355 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42347 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 22:51:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9841A550 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <700187311.8909.1308178247639.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050099#comment-13050099 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #657 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/657/]) HADOOP-7379. Add the ability to serialize and deserialize protocol buffers in ObjectWritable. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1136222 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/DataOutputOutputStream.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestRPC.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/util/TestProtoUtil.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/ProtoUtil.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestObjectWritableProtos.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/ObjectWritable.java > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:05:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05EDB458C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55863 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55823 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55815 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCBD41AEA9 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <236374698.8931.1308179088573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050104#comment-13050104 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7380: ---------------------------------------- Another open issue which needs to be addressed is synchronization around the {{FailoverProxyProvider}} on failover. This will be necessary since multiple threads may be accessing a single RPC proxy, and we don't want this to effectively cause the client to failover multiple times spuriously. I'll deal with this once I get confirmation that the general approach is sound. > Common portion of HDFS-1973 > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7380.0.patch, hadoop-7380.1.patch > > > Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:05:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11E9C47D1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60958 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60884 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60836 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA53541AF64 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <455199615.9096.1308179093825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050119#comment-13050119 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #746 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/746/]) > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:05:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E1F04865 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62708 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62665 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62541 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:05:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A841AF79 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1684030060.9116.1308179094396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050124#comment-13050124 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #746 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/746/]) > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:33:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CD0644EC for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6598 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6572 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6564 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:33:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:33:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542CB41A7FD for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2100048801.9251.1308180767341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Attachment: warn.patch setting HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS to anything suppresses the warning. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:35:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CBD14B65 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9408 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9368 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9355 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F3F41A8AE for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1772693893.9253.1308180887344.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050143#comment-13050143 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7398: --------------------------------- +1. lgtm. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:41:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91D5C4C30 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15400 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15362 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15352 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF5341AA95 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1991491254.9273.1308181247827.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I just committed this to trunk. Thanks Sharad and Owen! > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 15 23:41:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8E984C41 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15685 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15652 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15642 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:41:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D888241AA98 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1412229208.9275.1308181247883.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated HADOOP-6929: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:47:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93E7E4CEB for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81649 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:47:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81594 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81574 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:47:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:47:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:47:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D312841ABC9 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1760538336.9387.1308185207859.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan reassigned HADOOP-7297: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Christoph B=C3=B6hm > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Assignee: Christoph B=C3=B6hm > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#= Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to laun= ch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:48:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9737842F3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83262 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83191 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83162 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:48:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:48:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207AB41AC67 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:47:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1391931477.9405.1308185269129.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 50162#comment-13050162 ]=20 Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7297: ------------------------------------- Christoph - can you remove the rest of the references to backup and checkpo= int node? I'll manually test the patch since it's a bit of a pain without J= enkins. Thanks. -jg > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Assignee: Christoph B=C3=B6hm > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7297.patch > > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#= Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to laun= ch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. > I have removed this from the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:52:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97C4844E5 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93941 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93913 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93905 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:52:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:52:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF6641AEEB for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:51:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <611880176.9469.1308185509307.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050167#comment-13050167 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- The test is failing because snappy SO is not installed/available in the build machine. Options that I see for this are: 1* Install snappy in build machines 2* Drag into hadoop native code snappy code While #2 is simpler it means we are forking snappy for Hadoop usage. We could do this until snappy is available as a package (RPM/DEB). Thoughts? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 00:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22D9745EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99962 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99916 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 00:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99901 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 00:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:56:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA5E41A099 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1237229405.9477.1308185747519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050171#comment-13050171 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- this is why the snappy-java approach works well IMO. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 01:46:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B92694616 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38166 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38140 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 01:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38132 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 01:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9041ABC7 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1801929813.9574.1308188747548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050178#comment-13050178 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-7398: ------------------------------------------- Warning should go to stderr. If this env is not used outside of bin/hadoop, unset it. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 07:03:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15B576337 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9863 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 07:03:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9444 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 07:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8627 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 07:03:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:03:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A369A41B9EE for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <307925084.10027.1308207767666.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1928332496.4012.1308081047555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7391) Copy the interrface classification documentation of HADOOP-5073 into javadoc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7391: --------------------------------- Attachment: Hadoop Interface Taxonomy.html I have copied the interface classification stuff from HADOOP-5073 in the attached html. I plan to add this Overview.html in the package o.a.h.classification. I have added a couple of FAQs and minor edits but the text is mostly unchanged from HADOOP-5073 > Copy the interrface classification documentation of HADOOP-5073 into javadoc > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7391 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7391 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop Interface Taxonomy.html > > > The documentation for interface classification in Jira Hadoop-5073 was not copied to the Javadoc > of the classification. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 08:16:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8643C65AD for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20286 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20156 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19906 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 08:16:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:16:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A89E41BC60 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. ----------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 09:38:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 873B1628F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12210 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 09:38:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12165 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 09:38:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12157 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 09:38:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:38:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:38:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0BD41B11C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:37:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <714673755.10474.1308217069189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050313#comment-13050313 ] issei yoshida commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Alejandro, How do we drag Snappy code into Hadoop trunk? May we drag the Snappy svn repository of the google code as svn externals? I think that it'd make Hadoop trunk more complex. IMO, #1 is simpler approarch. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 11:48:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9BF36B39 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78990 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:48:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78867 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78858 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 11:48:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:48:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:48:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6971341B46D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1633629904.10678.1308224867428.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050360#comment-13050360 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------- What are the downsides of building on snappy-java? It seems to be updated frequently, is published in Maven, and would avoid loader conflicts with other Java projects that use snappy-java. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 12:14:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 956106B78 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34392 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 12:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34346 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 12:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34333 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 12:14:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:14:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE2641B126 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:13:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <458150255.10772.1308226429119.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050373#comment-13050373 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ ----------------------------------------------------------- (Updated 2011-06-16 12:13:34.081758) Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. Changes ------- Throw exceptions (getting rid of nulls). Add appropriate javadocs and fix one checkstyle nit. Summary ------- Since getSerialization() can possibly return a null, it is only right that getSerializer() and getDeserializer() usage functions do the same, instead of throwing up NPEs. Related issue to which this improvement is required: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2584 This addresses bug HADOOP-7328. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 Diffs (updated) ----- src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationFactory.java dee314a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/diff Testing ------- Existing SequenceFile serialization factory tests pass. The change is merely to make the functions return null instead of throwing an NPE within. Thanks, Harsh > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 12:16:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCE9F6F2D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38828 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 12:16:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38745 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 12:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38737 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 12:16:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:16:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:16:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA7641B24E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <619429730.10784.1308226547581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7328.r3.diff New patch that throws IOExceptions instead. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:18:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10D8B6863 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87482 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:18:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87436 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:18:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87420 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:18:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1EA41B27E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1964581123.11440.1308241067640.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050533#comment-13050533 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------------- Ugh. I hate the messages from review board. This is a completely incompatible change. I'd propose adding a new method to SerializationFactory that is about explaining why it wasn't found. I need to get back to HADOOP-6685 and move that forward. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:28:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A55FD6470 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10817 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10775 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10767 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7BE41B7E8 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1775819749.11466.1308241667379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Owen, Yes I noticed it doesn't compile the base after I did an {{ant clean compile}}. Was gonna cancel the patch right before your comment went in. Looking into the other issue you mention. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:46:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAB1267D9 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52997 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52941 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52884 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9987341C25A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Fines (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <395796746.11563.1308242747625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <149464743.7145.1308153347389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7397) Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Fines updated HADOOP-7397: -------------------------------- Attachment: timeout.patch > Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7397 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Environment: Any > Reporter: Scott Fines > Priority: Minor > Labels: hadoop > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: timeout.patch > > > If the NameNode is not available (in, for example, a network partition event separating the client from the NameNode), and an attempt is made to connect, then the FileSystem api will *eventually* timeout and throw an error. However, that timeout is currently hardcoded to be 20 seconds to connect, with 45 retries, for a total of a 15 minute wait before failure. While in many circumstances this is fine, there are also many circumstances (such as booting a service) where both the connection timeout and the number of retries should be significantly less, so as not to harm availability of other services. > Investigating Client.java, I see that there are two fields in Connection: maxRetries and rpcTimeout. I propose either re-using those fields for initiating the connection as well; alternatively, using the already existing dfs.socket.timeout parameter to set the connection timeout on initialization, and potentially adding a new field such as dfs.connection.retries with a default of 45 to replicate current behaviors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 16:46:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D33F36837 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53298 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53253 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53245 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:46:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2D541C256 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Fines (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <856665800.11559.1308242747513.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <149464743.7145.1308153347389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7397) Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Fines updated HADOOP-7397: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Release Note: Allows clients to specify connection timeouts with the conf parameter "ipc.client.connect.timeout" Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Here's a patch for trunk. I've added an additional Configuration parameter called "ipc.client.connect.timeout" with a default of 20000, and I've changed the max retries from a hardcoded int 45 to the "ipc.client.connection.max.retries" conf parameter. > Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7397 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Environment: Any > Reporter: Scott Fines > Priority: Minor > Labels: hadoop > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: timeout.patch > > > If the NameNode is not available (in, for example, a network partition event separating the client from the NameNode), and an attempt is made to connect, then the FileSystem api will *eventually* timeout and throw an error. However, that timeout is currently hardcoded to be 20 seconds to connect, with 45 retries, for a total of a 15 minute wait before failure. While in many circumstances this is fine, there are also many circumstances (such as booting a service) where both the connection timeout and the number of retries should be significantly less, so as not to harm availability of other services. > Investigating Client.java, I see that there are two fields in Connection: maxRetries and rpcTimeout. I propose either re-using those fields for initiating the connection as well; alternatively, using the already existing dfs.socket.timeout parameter to set the connection timeout on initialization, and potentially adding a new field such as dfs.connection.retries with a default of 45 to replicate current behaviors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 17:36:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF03F61EA for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44300 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:36:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44266 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 17:36:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44258 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 17:36:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:36:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3841C737 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2109320174.11686.1308245747491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050580#comment-13050580 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------- bq. This is a completely incompatible change The audience for SerializationFactory is private to HDFS and MR, so as long as we have matching patches for those projects, we don't need to consider this a user-facing incompatibility. Right? > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:22:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 323E9640B for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56970 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:22:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56937 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56929 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:22:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C152D41C348 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <452571753.12052.1308248508788.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050626#comment-13050626 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------- I actually do have two comments of concern w.r.t. front-end & throwing: If we are to make code changes _throw-y_, then it would require that all places that use the said API inside Hadoop add throws IOException to their methods. Upon a quick check, only one single SequenceFile private utility method required this change, and none in MapReduce. But it could've been that the change required subsequent public API changes. Since we've never had front end checks for MR serializers before; if people relied on passing strings over to job.xml and have it resolve only on worker machines - the related issue may break this functionality. Guideline-wise, its a wrong way to do it, but I think it still breaks something deep below I think. But I think its worth enforcing this check (null handling later or throw above, either way) since it makes stuff like job setup errors quicker to debug and iterate upon. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:33:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE95367AD for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84104 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:33:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84078 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84070 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:33:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:33:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:33:15 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C43C41C790 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1740160151.12080.1308249168243.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050632#comment-13050632 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------------- {quote} The audience for SerializationFactory is private to HDFS and MR. {quote} The annotations claiming it is limited private is *NOT* license to change it without severe need. There *are* other users and this change will break them. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AFE46CEC for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87763 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87665 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87653 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88C541C8EC for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1970702874.12097.1308249287818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050636#comment-13050636 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------- Are you OK with replacing the current behavior (throws NPE) with a "return null" instead, like the original patch on this JIRA? Anyone depending on a thrown NPE is just asking for trouble > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:47:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 152BB6E76 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12964 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12920 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12912 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553841C029 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1708763678.12221.1308250010805.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050641#comment-13050641 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- I've attached the snappy-java version of this codec for consideration > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:47:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CAD56E9A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13221 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13191 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13183 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2140A41CFC2 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1708333925.12174.1308250009132.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 18:47:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99FDA6EBA for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13488 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13463 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13455 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 18:47:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:47:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C641C02F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <560365360.12225.1308250010972.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050643#comment-13050643 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------- I'm good with returning (and where it applies, checking) nulls. I do not think that breaks anything at all. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 19:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 594F36A54 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6672 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6636 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6611 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 19:35:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD73941C450 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1460003215.12348.1308252887706.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050671#comment-13050671 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482838/v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/643//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 19:47:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16C76520 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35492 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35456 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 19:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35448 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 19:47:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:47:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:47:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C902A41CB0D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1600040888.12447.1308253607819.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <149464743.7145.1308153347389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7397) Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050682#comment-13050682 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7397: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482821/timeout.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/642//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/642//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/642//console This message is automatically generated. > Allow configurable timeouts when connecting to HDFS via java FileSystem API > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7397 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7397 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Environment: Any > Reporter: Scott Fines > Priority: Minor > Labels: hadoop > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: timeout.patch > > > If the NameNode is not available (in, for example, a network partition event separating the client from the NameNode), and an attempt is made to connect, then the FileSystem api will *eventually* timeout and throw an error. However, that timeout is currently hardcoded to be 20 seconds to connect, with 45 retries, for a total of a 15 minute wait before failure. While in many circumstances this is fine, there are also many circumstances (such as booting a service) where both the connection timeout and the number of retries should be significantly less, so as not to harm availability of other services. > Investigating Client.java, I see that there are two fields in Connection: maxRetries and rpcTimeout. I propose either re-using those fields for initiating the connection as well; alternatively, using the already existing dfs.socket.timeout parameter to set the connection timeout on initialization, and potentially adding a new field such as dfs.connection.retries with a default of 45 to replicate current behaviors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:15:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9D7C6E65 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87708 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:15:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87646 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:15:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87638 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:15:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:15:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:15:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6AF41C732 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1564252336.12495.1308255287518.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: (was: v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:19:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D8CF601C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91956 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:19:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91917 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91889 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:19:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:19:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:19:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42AC41C9AE for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1902602762.12552.1308255527865.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:21:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C4146578 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95066 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95031 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95023 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAFA41CBCA for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1477484639.12698.1308255650773.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:21:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 903E56584 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95313 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95283 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95275 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:21:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1294241CB96 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:20:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942120000.12647.1308255649072.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: (was: v1-0001-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:29:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0F20697E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13371 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13348 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13340 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C42F41CE3F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1564639476.12717.1308256127374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Attachment: warn.patch This sends the warning to stderr. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:33:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54CEA6BE1 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19381 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19373 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E27A41C07C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <161508832.12723.1308256368120.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Comment: was deleted (was: This sends the warning to stderr.) > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:33:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF1CB6BEF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19657 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19629 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19621 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A21E41C082 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <222484047.12727.1308256368235.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Attachment: (was: warn.patch) > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:33:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF3A16C3F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20096 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20054 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19980 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:33:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5CF41C095 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <195981494.12744.1308256368911.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Attachment: warn-204.patch warn.patch The warn patch for 20-security adds the suppression and redirects it to stderr. The 204/205 patch removes the warning. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01E9C64AA for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24207 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24146 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24125 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6B441C228 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <104084546.12753.1308256487584.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050710#comment-13050710 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7398: --------------------------------- +1, the new patches lgtm. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:37:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62A846535 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27216 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27180 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27170 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:37:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:37:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A49141C35C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <591022018.12802.1308256609038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050711#comment-13050711 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482850/v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/644//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/644//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/644//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:39:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 820D765A3 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33650 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33600 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33484 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:39:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:39:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:39:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9D941C4C0 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir test-junit: [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:53:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A4496F4E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57415 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57372 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57243 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838EE41CCFE for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1489280073.12870.1308257567535.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7398. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.205.0 0.20.204.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I just committed this. > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:55:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C8B3619F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62493 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62443 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:55:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62433 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:55:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD241CF03 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <24973087.12893.1308257687877.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7400: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7400.patch > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 20:57:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 113616254 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65182 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65144 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 20:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65136 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 20:57:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:57:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:57:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB3C41C075 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1475256669.12907.1308257807712.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-7400: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7400.patch > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch, HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 21:28:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8150260C8 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75912 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75885 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75877 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 21:07:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:07:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:07:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC441C4B6 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <437014379.12957.1308258407900.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050730#comment-13050730 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-7400: ------------------------------------ Thanks, Giri. With this patch, the test is launched correctly. Although TestHdfsProxy is a bit flaky in trunk, this patch should still apply. +1 on commit to 0.20-security. For trunk the patch needs to be a bit different due to the tree structure change. > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch, HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 21:32:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C33BB6010 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11557 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:32:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11521 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11512 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 21:32:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:32:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:32:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F2B41CE6D for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1865119655.13000.1308259907398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050744#comment-13050744 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-7400: ------------------------------------ Hmm. It seems the entire TestHdfsProxy is disabled in trunk. I thought just one thing was disabled in the test. We can still do the same on trunk since the code is still there and may be brought back to life in the future. > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch, HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 21:36:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8DE26B4A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17591 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:36:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17565 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 21:36:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17557 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 21:36:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:36:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:36:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3CB41C061 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kihwal Lee (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1602363391.13012.1308260147440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050747#comment-13050747 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-7400: ------------------------------------ FYI, the following was done to trunk in HDFS-1666. If anyone intend to verify hdfsproxy in trunk or any release based off trunk, HDFS-1666 needs to be revisited. {code} + {code} > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch, HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 22:58:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13DF16758 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31865 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 22:58:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31835 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 22:58:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31827 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 22:58:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:58:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:58:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C7D41C14C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1994815367.13214.1308265067684.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671-i.patch common-mvn-layout-i.sh rebased to trunk's head. script & patch version 'i' test-patch.sh wired findbugs/clover/rat/checkstyle work. Refer to BUILDING.txt file for details. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 23:04:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 947556D52 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41169 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:04:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41129 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41121 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 23:04:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:04:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:04:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326F141C3BF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:03:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1715106687.13272.1308265428203.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050787#comment-13050787 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482874/HADOOP-6671-i.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 57 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/645//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 16 23:40:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CAA06F15 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78250 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:40:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78155 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 23:40:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78110 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 23:40:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:40:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:40:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1E141C605 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:39:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1982428292.13417.1308267588112.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <345461627.12821.1308256728638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7400) HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-7400. ---------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.206.0 > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7400 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.206.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.20.206.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7400.patch, HADOOP-7400.patch > > > HdfsProxyTests fails when the -Dtest.build.dir and -Dbuild.test is set a dir other than build dir > test-junit: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/y/var/builds/thread2/workspace/Cloud-Hadoop-0.20.1xx-Secondary/src/contrib/hdfsproxy/src/test/resources/proxy-config > [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec > [junit] Test org.apache.hadoop.hdfsproxy.TestHdfsProxy FAILED -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 00:47:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD1F56115 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55963 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55933 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55925 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 00:47:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:47:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0F641AA85 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1142015754.13505.1308271607386.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050831#comment-13050831 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7380: ------------------------------------- Took a quick look at the patch. Overall the approach looks sane, I'll follow up with more detailed review feedback. > Common portion of HDFS-1973 > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7380.0.patch, hadoop-7380.1.patch > > > Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 01:07:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 467E36CDC for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70060 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70035 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70026 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 01:07:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:07:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:07:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5FF41C1BF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <974102316.13598.1308272808964.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050835#comment-13050835 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- For both patches, the codec should be defined in the codecs property in commons-default.xml > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 02:01:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB3D140C0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21584 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 02:01:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21550 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 02:01:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21537 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 02:01:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:01:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:01:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEBD41D1ED for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:00:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1128275309.13740.1308276049123.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt v3 adds SnappyCodec to core-default.xml > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 02:15:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28C5D417E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30228 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 02:15:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30145 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 02:15:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30120 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 02:15:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:15:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:15:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54E341D66C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1859928895.13801.1308276889673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050859#comment-13050859 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482888/v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/646//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/646//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/646//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 15:23:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F81841EC for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99896 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 15:23:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99407 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 15:23:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99391 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 15:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C702841E0D4 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7401 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 Reporter: monica beckwith Priority: Minor When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 0>len<7' is a hot loop and 'while len>7' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536) . -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 15:39:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB9EE4E1C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35061 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 15:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35006 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 15:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34998 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 15:39:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:39:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FEA41E865 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1170654712.15266.1308325127414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Description: When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 0>len<7' is a hot loop and 'while len>7' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. was:When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 0>len<7' is a hot loop and 'while len>7' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536) . > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 0>len<7' is a hot loop and 'while len>7' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 16:07:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F79C49AD for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96552 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 16:07:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96486 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 16:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96478 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 16:07:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:07:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:07:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DDF41E84C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1378269829.15355.1308326807876.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7330: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.203.1, 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch > > > The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 16:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2967F4454 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54943 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 16:35:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54919 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 16:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54911 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 16:35:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:35:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A96741E5EE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1813025616.15448.1308328487630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Description: When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. was: When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 0>len<7' is a hot loop and 'while len>7' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:29:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D7FB421F for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55293 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55249 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55241 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35E941E5C8 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <439916422.15691.1308331728797.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:29:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6D62427B for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56246 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56215 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56205 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0E141E5CB for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1684048523.15694.1308331728902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7277: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:29:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3346C428A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56514 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56479 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56469 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:29:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62CF41E5CC for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2116542248.15695.1308331728939.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7274: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04B4B48FF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59401 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59374 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59365 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C171C41E6FE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <305373051.15705.1308331847789.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:31:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10A5D493C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59719 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59669 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59657 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:31:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CC341E6F8 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1743542645.15699.1308331847491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.20.204.0 > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: C7248-1.patch, HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:39:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF7F14D04 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70173 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70073 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:39:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69851 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:39:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:39:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:39:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE8D41E98E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1179062691.15731.1308332327578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: 7269-combined-002.patch Fixed 2 additional compiler warnings. Thanks Todd for helping me track them down. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined-002.patch, 7269-combined-proper.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 17:55:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BE384BC3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93244 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:55:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93165 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 17:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93088 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 17:55:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:55:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAD341E46C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <998425100.15811.1308333287634.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051220#comment-13051220 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482960/7269-combined-002.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/647//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/647//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/647//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-Added-support-for-metadata-to-be-applied-to-objects-.patch, 0002-Added-check-that-metadata-was-set-to-unit-test.patch, 7269-combined-002.patch, 7269-combined-proper.patch, 7269-combined.patch, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:03:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 348884021 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10223 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:03:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10197 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10188 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:03:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:03:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:03:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B080A41E934 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <946948744.15845.1308333767719.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7539864.45541295391523753.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7111) Several TFile tests failing when native libraries are present MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051227#comment-13051227 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7111: ------------------------------------- Something in trunk just changed such that the native libs are on the classpath when the tests run, so the tests are now failing: https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/721/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.io.file.tfile/TestTFileByteArrays/testOneBlockPlusOneEntry/ > Several TFile tests failing when native libraries are present > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7111 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7111 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > When running tests with native libraries present, TestTFileByteArrays and TestTFileJClassComparatorByteArrays fail on trunk. They don't seem to fail in 0.20 with native libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:48:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74A124218 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95226 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95188 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95180 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980E141EE19 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself ----------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7402 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers Priority: Trivial Fix For: 0.23.0 Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:48:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6E594236 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95398 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95347 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95292 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:48:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC78441EE1C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <60905139.15945.1308336467703.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7402: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7402.0.patch Patch which fixes the issue. I manually verified that the created directories are cleaned up after a run of this test. > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:56:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8FF94641 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2371 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2305 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2191 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904E541E2AA for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1714333275.15965.1308336947587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7403) Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit ---------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7403 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: site Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Attachments: hadoop-7403.txt We need to update the version control URLs on the site -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:56:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2E70466A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2680 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2634 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2423 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:56:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B282E41E2AF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2047674763.15970.1308336947727.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1714333275.15965.1308336947587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7403) Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7403: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7403.txt Here's a fix. Someone please sanity-check I didn't flub a URL? :) > Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7403.txt > > > We need to update the version control URLs on the site -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 18:58:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB0F46B9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6004 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:58:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5977 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 18:58:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5968 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 18:58:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:58:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:58:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6317441E3EB for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <556104858.15972.1308337067402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051250#comment-13051250 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7402: ------------------------------------- Rather than doing that, why not fix the test so that it chdirs into the build directory first? Or sets the conf to point to the build dir? > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 19:00:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD22A47C7 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9851 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9783 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:00:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9775 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 19:00:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:00:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:00:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A151E41E55B for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <778519518.15985.1308337187657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051253#comment-13051253 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7402: -------------------------------------------- Those test dirs should be written in the build directory, not to pollute the source tree. Using the Java Sys prop 'test.build.data' as the base for those dirs would do. Thxs. > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 19:14:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6E094327 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35080 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35048 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35039 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E94541ED24 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <751034416.16022.1308338027515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7402: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7402.1.patch Patch which uses "test.build.data" as a prefix for the directories. > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 19:14:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F481433E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35602 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35570 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35546 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 19:14:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C43741ED29 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1932809549.16024.1308338027571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7402: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 19:34:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D75544B3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67043 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66968 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 19:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66869 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 19:34:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:34:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0880D41E8E6 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <547610371.16092.1308339228031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051276#comment-13051276 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7402: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482974/hadoop-7402.1.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/648//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/648//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/648//console This message is automatically generated. > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570D94CD1 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34998 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34952 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34944 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CEF41E35B for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1255628176.16287.1308341868131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1293648970.8758.1308177527351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7398) create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7398: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > create a mechanism to suppress the HADOOP_HOME deprecated warning > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7398 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: warn-204.patch, warn.patch, warn.patch > > > Create a new mechanism to suppress the warning about HADOOP_HOME deprecation. > I'll create a HADOOP_HOME_WARN_SUPPRESS environment variable that suppresses the warning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 922C84EA9 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36175 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36145 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36136 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED541E364 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1391602129.16294.1308341868324.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7277: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70AA64ECC for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36491 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36403 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36386 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C9441E373 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2045330380.16304.1308341868626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: C7248-1.patch, HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A8724EDB for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36446 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36401 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36385 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F48C41E368 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <109098382.16298.1308341868452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7274: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9CDB4F22 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37151 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37113 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37092 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA8D41E361 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1222347692.16291.1308341868241.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <879608400.1240.1307478358811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7364) TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7364: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7364 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7364-trunk.patch, HADOOP-7364.patch > > > TestMiniMRDFSCaching fails if test.build.dir is set to something other than build/test. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:18:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7067A4F37 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37412 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37376 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37368 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:18:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECFF41E377 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1664707300.16307.1308341868711.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V2.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:23:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3752749C3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42693 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42647 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42636 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD38E41E60B for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1178172617.16334.1308342167902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7324: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.204.0) > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, there are a few users who prefer using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:23:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77F6F49D2 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42954 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42886 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42822 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1D741E605 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1150959099.16329.1308342167763.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7311: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.204.0) > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:31:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 056BA4063 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50739 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50699 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50691 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:31:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB4741E955 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <455847575.16360.1308342647581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1327657029.27279.1304663043230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7262) Update CS docs with better example configs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7262: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.204.0) > Update CS docs with better example configs > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7262 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7262.patch, capacity_scheduler.pdf > > > It will be nice to enhance CS docs with real-world example configs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 20:39:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFD194221 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61684 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61599 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 20:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61553 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 20:39:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:39:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C1141EC9C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1618155710.16415.1308343129270.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051313#comment-13051313 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Jake, I've tested your patch and it works. A few of comments on the patch: * the change in build.xml seems unnecessary. * SnappyCompressor.compress() method has a log INFO, it should be removed or it should be a log DEBUG within an if DEBUG_ENABLED block, and what is prints seems wrong (the reported compressed size is always bigger than the outBuf) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:18:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85B654720 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16907 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:18:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16868 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:18:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16858 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:18:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:18:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:18:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B2B41EC34 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:17:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1211221567.16500.1308345469261.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <158298796.897.1307467918824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7363) TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051327#comment-13051327 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7363: ------------------------------------ There is overlap between the intent of this ticket and the existing TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem and FSMainOperationsBaseTest. > TestRawLocalFileSystemContract is needed > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7363 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7363 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > FileSystemContractBaseTest is supposed to be run with each concrete FileSystem implementation to insure adherence to the "contract" for FileSystem behavior. However, currently only HDFS and S3 do so. RawLocalFileSystem, at least, needs to be added. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:28:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 580554456 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26738 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26691 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26676 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:28:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A298541E14C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <532987074.16533.1308346067662.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7401.patch > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:30:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C81B3457E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28029 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27996 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27988 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:30:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8897A41E223 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <419025847.16553.1308346187556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 Release Note: fixed warmup in the perf test. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:34:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA714A66 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30326 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30279 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30271 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE19D41E4FE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1703238116.16571.1308346427709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051336#comment-13051336 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7401: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482990/HADOOP-7401.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/649//console This message is automatically generated. > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:34:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EB374AB7 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30698 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30650 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30606 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:34:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:34:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107B441E50E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:33:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1503965830.16584.1308346428064.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7399.3.patch This is a very early version of the patch. I still need to do lot more code cleanup. Sasl messages for connection setup also need to be handled consistently. The basic idea is to use ClientCall and ServerCall as the abstractions for interaction between an RpcEngine and ipc.Client/Server. > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:36:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C57A4BE6 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33968 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33942 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33934 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:36:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:36:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BAA41E5AA for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:35:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1193771986.16586.1308346548093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change] > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:44:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EECF24D9A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42856 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:44:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42832 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42824 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A079441EA15 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1886630754.16614.1308347027653.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reassigned HADOOP-7401: ---------------------------------------------- Assignee: monica beckwith Hi Monica, this is an interesting discovery! Could you also post the results before and after the patch? BTW, you need to generate patches at the project root directory. Otherwise, Hadoop QA could not apply it. > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 21:51:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0BB94657 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54798 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:51:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54717 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 21:51:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54709 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 21:51:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:51:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:51:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EBB41ED9F for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:50:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <591176784.16694.1308347449299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051346#comment-13051346 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Extra comment: indentation of java code should be 2 spaces, not 4 > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:11:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D99BF4FA6 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73441 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:11:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73410 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:11:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73402 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:11:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:11:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:11:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EE741F29C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1650452057.16753.1308348647467.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7327-2.patch Correct. I've added a test case to FSMainOperationsBaseTest. Also touched up a couple apparent errors in that unit test file, such as no @Test annotations on two testcases that work just fine and fast. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch, hadoop-7327-2.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:25:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E748493C for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87187 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87158 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87150 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:25:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:25:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0941F784 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <949687869.16798.1308349487492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051363#comment-13051363 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7327: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482998/hadoop-7327-2.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/650//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/650//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/650//console This message is automatically generated. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch, hadoop-7327-2.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E868F4F3F for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91272 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91140 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91030 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:31:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:31:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70B441F905 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <833863948.16819.1308349848681.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:35:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FF6A4047 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94787 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94761 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94752 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:35:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:35:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:35:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1312441F9FA for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:34:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2109073898.16828.1308350089074.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051367#comment-13051367 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------ FSMainOperationsBaseTest is a nice class that seems well-behaved for sharing between unit tests of multiple FileSystems, both Local and HDFS. It uses FileSystemTestHelper for setting up test data root directories. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:53:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C906B49ED for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15400 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15369 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15359 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D2341FF76 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1492935609.16872.1308351167397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051377#comment-13051377 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7402: ------------------------------------- +1 > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:55:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFDA24AA3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19394 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19341 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19316 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A1241E1F0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1855687681.16884.1308351287720.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051378#comment-13051378 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482993/HADOOP-7399.3.patch against trunk revision 1136249. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1074 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1067 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 3 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/651//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/651//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/651//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 22:55:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8A214AAD for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19411 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19343 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19317 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58AC41E1F3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <470816890.16887.1308351287806.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7402: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks atm! > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 17 23:40:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A216D4689 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64689 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 23:40:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64658 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2011 23:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64649 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2011 23:40:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:40:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE0641F2B0 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <131346312.17013.1308353987447.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051401#comment-13051401 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------ I think I found the problem with TestTrash using one's personal .Trash folder instead of something from the "TestLFS" file system. The main testcase, #testTrash() sets the TestLFS correctly, then calls #trashShell(FileSystem, Path), which throws away the config object in which the TestLFS was set, and instantiates a new one instead. I've changed it to call fs.getConf() instead, thereby preserving the use of the TestLFS configuration. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 00:48:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 770104170 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13287 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 00:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13254 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 00:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13243 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 00:48:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:48:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2492F41C06A for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:47:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <257859789.17144.1308358070146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt Thanks for the feedback. Incorporated those changes into v4 > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:00:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1F484CCB for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26720 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26657 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26457 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3604841C40D for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <160595976.17212.1308358789217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1714333275.15965.1308336947587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7403) Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-7403. --------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate apparently Luke fixed this while I was working on the patch :) > Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7403.txt > > > We need to update the version control URLs on the site -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:00:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 118F14CE1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26866 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26847 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26838 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DF041C409 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1184942442.17208.1308358789102.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1714333275.15965.1308336947587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7403) Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051424#comment-13051424 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7403: ---------------------------------------- +1 looks good to me. > Fix SVN urls on site after unsplit > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7403 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7403.txt > > > We need to update the version control URLs on the site -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:00:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF24F4D05 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27495 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27454 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27216 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:00:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0592241C406 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:59:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <526744128.17205.1308358789019.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051423#comment-13051423 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- I noticed that the compression overhead in this patch is {{(bufferSize >> 3) + 128 + 3}} which is less than the maximum possible blowup that Snappy allows for (http://code.google.com/p/snappy/source/browse/trunk/snappy.cc#55). Should this be changed to {{bufferSize / 6 + 32}}? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:04:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C219D41CA for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32034 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:04:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31997 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31989 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:04:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:04:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:04:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733C441C4F0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <750698678.17238.1308359027468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051426#comment-13051426 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483020/v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt against trunk revision 1137065. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/652//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/652//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/652//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:20:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A5C54146 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51179 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:20:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51142 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51134 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:20:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:20:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F0B41C8B5 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:19:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <492679810.17347.1308359990668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051429#comment-13051429 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- Hi Tom. Good find. Actually snappy-java exposes this call so perhaps it should change to {noformat} Snappy.maxCompressedLength(bufferSize) - bufferSize; {noformat} Agree? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:40:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B3764C31 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63269 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:40:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63238 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:40:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63230 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:40:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:40:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:40:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066E941CF43 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:39:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <778622023.17385.1308361188023.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt v5 includes mentioned change > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 01:54:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31AEA4686 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70589 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70555 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 01:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70547 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 01:54:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:54:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:54:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7504441F2A7 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <370337148.17443.1308362027476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051436#comment-13051436 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483021/v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt against trunk revision 1137065. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/653//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/653//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/653//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: issei yoshida > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 12:54:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60F796836 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17661 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 12:54:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17604 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 12:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17440 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 12:54:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:54:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:54:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BA3420CAC for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Celina_d=C2=B4_=C3=81vila_Samogin_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <633001546.18025.1308401627753.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 51509#comment-13051509 ]=20 Celina d=C2=B4 =C3=81vila Samogin commented on HADOOP-6846: ------------------------------------------------- After many tests, I submit some scripts to generate the hadoop tarball with= out documentation and no source code, only for 32 bit binary code. I have u= sed in my master's job. With these scripts, you can get a hadoop tarball with modified and compiled= source code for testing. The scripts were based on patches HADOOP-6342 and HADOOP-6846. https://github.com/celinasam/Generate-Hadoop-Tarball > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:02:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65C4D6BEE for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78842 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:02:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78809 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:02:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78800 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:02:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:02:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:02:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02188420EEF for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <926418756.18277.1308416508005.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1022068843.6096.1308124428641.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7396) The information returned by the wrong usage of the command "hadoop job -events <#-of-events>" is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J resolved HADOOP-7396. ----------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate > The information returned by the wrong usage of the command "hadoop job -events <#-of-events>" is not appropriate > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7396 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7396 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > With wrong value of from-event-# and #-of-events, though the from-events-# after the #-of-events for example from 1000 to 1, the command always return 0.It is expected to show detailed information, like "the start number should be less than the end number for range of events". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:06:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABFB767CB for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83880 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:06:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83849 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83841 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:06:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:06:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689D24200DC for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <425713541.18294.1308416747425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1597399507.67325.1307137547450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7358) Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7358: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) (Marking as PA since Todd may have forgotten to -- For Hudson) > Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7358.txt > > > When a server implementation throws an exception handling an RPC, the Handler thread catches it and logs it before responding with the exception over the IPC channel. This is currently done at INFO level. > I'd like to propose that, if the exception is an unchecked exception, it should be logged at WARN level instead. This can help alert operators when they might be hitting some kind of bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:26:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFCCF6EF1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97239 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:26:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97209 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:26:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97198 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:26:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:26:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686A94204F3 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1098345397.18317.1308417947424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1597399507.67325.1307137547450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7358) Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051563#comment-13051563 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7358: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481410/hadoop-7358.txt against trunk revision 1137065. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/654//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/654//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/654//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve log levels when exceptions caught in RPC handler > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7358 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7358 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7358.txt > > > When a server implementation throws an exception handling an RPC, the Handler thread catches it and logs it before responding with the exception over the IPC channel. This is currently done at INFO level. > I'd like to propose that, if the exception is an unchecked exception, it should be logged at WARN level instead. This can help alert operators when they might be hitting some kind of bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:28:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9D1F6F31 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98737 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98707 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98698 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBF54205AA for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <661700138.18324.1308418067639.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1838851750.12019.1304096043285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7252) JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J reassigned HADOOP-7252: ------------------------------- Assignee: Harsh J > JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, conf, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Pony > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:28:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04F276F3F for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98983 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98948 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98776 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B2D4205A7 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1197960407.18321.1308418067540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1838851750.12019.1304096043285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7252) JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 51564#comment-13051564 ]=20 Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7252: --------------------------------- This appears to be fixed on trunk, but remains "common->default" on 0.22. C= ould be fixed for 0.22 also. {{git log}} shows Hadoop moves from OO'M last, so can't tell which JIRA her= e=E2=80=A6 > JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, conf, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Pony > Priority: Minor > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:34:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A020A63A6 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3414 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3380 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3368 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746EC420826 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1584164643.18330.1308418427473.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1838851750.12019.1304096043285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7252) JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7252: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7252bp22.r1.diff Fix against 0.22 branch. Patch *not* intended for Trunk/0.23 > JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, conf, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Pony > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7252bp22.r1.diff > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:34:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6B463B6 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3699 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3623 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3498 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:34:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB2942082C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1074630760.18334.1308418427585.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1838851750.12019.1304096043285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7252) JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7252: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch available for 0.22. (Please ignore Hudson run, since that would run for trunk where this appears already fixed) > JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, conf, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Pony > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7252bp22.r1.diff > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 17:44:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C958E673B for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9918 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:44:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9887 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 17:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9879 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 17:44:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F664209DD for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1868372683.18339.1308419027607.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1838851750.12019.1304096043285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7252) JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051571#comment-13051571 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7252: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483056/HADOOP-7252bp22.r1.diff against trunk revision 1137065. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/655//console This message is automatically generated. > JUnit shows up as a compile time dependency > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7252 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, conf, test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Pony > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7252bp22.r1.diff > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 18:14:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBA65635B for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22153 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22145 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 18:14:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:14:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B3420E3A for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <865314287.18346.1308420827351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6804) allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051573#comment-13051573 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6804: --------------------------------- Ted - Is http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/Secure_Impersonation.html what you're looking for? > allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6804 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > > When the user calling FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() doesn't have permission to write to certain hdfs path: > Thread [main] (Suspended (exception AccessControlException)) > DFSClient.mkdirs(String, FsPermission) line: 905 > DistributedFileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FsPermission) line: 262 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).mkdirs(Path) line: 1162 > FileUtil.copy(FileSystem, Path, FileSystem, Path, boolean, boolean, Configuration) line: 194 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path, Path) line: 1231 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, Path, Path) line: 1207 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(Path, Path) line: 1179 > GridM2mInstallation.copyInputFiles(FlowConfigurations$FlowConf) line: 380 > Passwordless ssh has been setup for current user, tyu, on localhost and user hadoop on hdfs > FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() should be able to execute using a different username than effective user on localhost so that AccessControlException can be avoided. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 18:18:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B116F1D for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23014 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:18:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22982 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:18:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22974 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 18:18:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:18:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57668420EF1 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <900011000.18348.1308421067354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6840) Support non-recursive create() in FileSystem & SequenceFile.Writer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-6840: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 0.20-append (Adding in Fix versions to track) > Support non-recursive create() in FileSystem & SequenceFile.Writer > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6840 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6840 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs, io > Affects Versions: 0.20-append, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20-append, 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6840_0.20-append.patch, HADOOP-6840_0.21-2.patch, HADOOP-6840_0.21.patch > > > The proposed solution for HBASE-2312 requires the sequence file to handle a non-recursive create. This is already supported by HDFS, but needs to have an equivalent FileSystem & SequenceFile.Writer API. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 18:26:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC16699C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30720 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:26:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30696 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:26:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30688 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 18:26:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:26:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:26:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569E1420100 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <965386948.18365.1308421547351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6801) io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051577#comment-13051577 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6801: --------------------------------- One solution would be to make these options sequence-file specific since they can't obviously be related to MapReduce here? > io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6801 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Erik Steffl > Priority: Minor > > Following configuration keys in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java (former CommonConfigurationKeys.java): > public static final String IO_SORT_MB_KEY = "io.sort.mb"; > public static final String IO_SORT_FACTOR_KEY = "io.sort.factor"; > are partially moved: > - they were renamed to mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb and mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor respectively > - they were moved to mapreduce project, documented in mapred-default.xml > However: > - they are still listed in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java as quoted above > - strings "io.sort.mb" and "io.sort.factor" are used in SequenceFile.java in Hadoop Common project > Not sure what the solution is, these constants should probably be removed from CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java but I am not sure what's the best solution for SequenceFile.java. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 18:28:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E306A91 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34427 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34399 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34390 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8DB420198 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1266023974.18373.1308421667760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6801) io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051578#comment-13051578 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6801: --------------------------------- Or perhaps add Sorter constructors that let one specify, and fall back to a documented default instead of a configuration carried one. > io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6801 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Erik Steffl > Priority: Minor > > Following configuration keys in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java (former CommonConfigurationKeys.java): > public static final String IO_SORT_MB_KEY = "io.sort.mb"; > public static final String IO_SORT_FACTOR_KEY = "io.sort.factor"; > are partially moved: > - they were renamed to mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb and mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor respectively > - they were moved to mapreduce project, documented in mapred-default.xml > However: > - they are still listed in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java as quoted above > - strings "io.sort.mb" and "io.sort.factor" are used in SequenceFile.java in Hadoop Common project > Not sure what the solution is, these constants should probably be removed from CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java but I am not sure what's the best solution for SequenceFile.java. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 18:28:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321706A9E for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34622 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34574 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34470 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD46A42019B for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1676983658.18376.1308421667837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6801) io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J reassigned HADOOP-6801: ------------------------------- Assignee: Harsh J > io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6801 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Erik Steffl > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > > Following configuration keys in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java (former CommonConfigurationKeys.java): > public static final String IO_SORT_MB_KEY = "io.sort.mb"; > public static final String IO_SORT_FACTOR_KEY = "io.sort.factor"; > are partially moved: > - they were renamed to mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb and mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor respectively > - they were moved to mapreduce project, documented in mapred-default.xml > However: > - they are still listed in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java as quoted above > - strings "io.sort.mb" and "io.sort.factor" are used in SequenceFile.java in Hadoop Common project > Not sure what the solution is, these constants should probably be removed from CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java but I am not sure what's the best solution for SequenceFile.java. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 18 22:53:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F21006C6E for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95191 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95071 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95063 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 22:53:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:53:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:53:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98939420378 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <473628834.18553.1308437567621.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6804) allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051615#comment-13051615 ] Ted Yu commented on HADOOP-6804: -------------------------------- Does hadoop commandline utility support this impersonation ? Thanks > allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6804 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > > When the user calling FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() doesn't have permission to write to certain hdfs path: > Thread [main] (Suspended (exception AccessControlException)) > DFSClient.mkdirs(String, FsPermission) line: 905 > DistributedFileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FsPermission) line: 262 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).mkdirs(Path) line: 1162 > FileUtil.copy(FileSystem, Path, FileSystem, Path, boolean, boolean, Configuration) line: 194 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path, Path) line: 1231 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, Path, Path) line: 1207 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(Path, Path) line: 1179 > GridM2mInstallation.copyInputFiles(FlowConfigurations$FlowConf) line: 380 > Passwordless ssh has been setup for current user, tyu, on localhost and user hadoop on hdfs > FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() should be able to execute using a different username than effective user on localhost so that AccessControlException can be avoided. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 03:05:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66AA947D6 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59464 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 03:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59437 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 03:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59427 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 03:05:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:05:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6AB41FB12 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:04:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <983342773.18691.1308452689907.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6424) Port FsShell to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051630#comment-13051630 ] John George commented on HADOOP-6424: ------------------------------------- I think it is perfectly fine to create individual tickets for each symlink property. It might even be easier to review in that case. > Port FsShell to FileContext > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: John George > Attachments: HADOOP-6424.patch, HADOOP-6424.patch > > > FsShell currently uses FileSystem, needs to be moved over to FileContext. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 04:03:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 008BC4F84 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77864 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 04:03:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77837 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 04:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77829 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 04:03:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:03:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F900421AF5 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1036744552.18754.1308456167453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <18635139.89501293838185702.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7082) Configuration.writeXML should not hold lock while outputting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051635#comment-13051635 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7082: ------------------------------------- Can someone pull this patch into MR-279 branch? > Configuration.writeXML should not hold lock while outputting > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7082 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7082 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7082.txt > > > Common side of HDFS-1542 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 05:26:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CD7045DA for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3934 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 05:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3867 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 05:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3659 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 05:26:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:26:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750A4421B34 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1134372006.18826.1308461147476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6804) allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051642#comment-13051642 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-6804: --------------------------------- No I do not think the CLI utilities have this in their code. They directly try as the user you are running. Since am not very clear on this one but willing to work a bit on it, could you tell me why is this required? > allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6804 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > > When the user calling FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() doesn't have permission to write to certain hdfs path: > Thread [main] (Suspended (exception AccessControlException)) > DFSClient.mkdirs(String, FsPermission) line: 905 > DistributedFileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FsPermission) line: 262 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).mkdirs(Path) line: 1162 > FileUtil.copy(FileSystem, Path, FileSystem, Path, boolean, boolean, Configuration) line: 194 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path, Path) line: 1231 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, Path, Path) line: 1207 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(Path, Path) line: 1179 > GridM2mInstallation.copyInputFiles(FlowConfigurations$FlowConf) line: 380 > Passwordless ssh has been setup for current user, tyu, on localhost and user hadoop on hdfs > FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() should be able to execute using a different username than effective user on localhost so that AccessControlException can be avoided. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 08:21:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 911BC4D45 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88672 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 08:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88242 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 08:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88234 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 08:21:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:21:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:21:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8BE421E80 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil Goyal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7404 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sunil Goyal Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 14:10:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 770754D18 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96742 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 14:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96714 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 14:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96706 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 14:10:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:10:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:10:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE814219DC for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1792743879.19194.1308492587385.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051686#comment-13051686 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7404: --------------------------------- Sunil, Interesting points here I think :) Some Qs: How often do you have to face #1 in practice? I do not get your "other tools" points, care to explain with an example of sorts? > Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sunil Goyal > > Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 > It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: > 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. > 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. > 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). > I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- > 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). > 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). > 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 16:38:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D859F4A20 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85810 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 16:38:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85781 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 16:38:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85773 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 16:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:38:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A40422110 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <912347773.19253.1308501467363.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-310: -------------------------------- Attachment: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch I think the offset would be ideal, but the extra constructor and a set() method which does the same is a good incremental change. That patch is attached. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 16:50:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFE07413F for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89934 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89900 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89892 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 16:50:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:50:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:50:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADB04222E0 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil Goyal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <633335823.19260.1308502187369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051706#comment-13051706 ] Sunil Goyal commented on HADOOP-7404: ------------------------------------- Hello Harsh I am from EDA (Electronics Design Automation) Domain. There are very large text file of GDS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDSII) of 20GB-100GB is common. It is the standard format used by all the tools for exchange of data. All the standard tools (like Cadence, Synopsys, Magma, other free tools) use this format. This file contains the various records of different size. It is difficult to insert the padding in this format. Standard tools will not be able to understand it. It is open standard format. It is difficult to change this format. It is widely accepted by the industry. It is easy to dump out the separate file giving the location of these offsets. It will help to use the Hadoop for these types of format. There are also other format like this in EDA (LEF, DEF , Power Optimization format, Simulation Result Format). I think giving the option as offset file splitting will be helpful in general. Different type of application user knows where they can get the maximum advantage parallelism by spliting of it its own location. > Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sunil Goyal > > Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 > It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: > 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. > 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. > 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). > I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- > 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). > 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). > 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 19:34:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DEB347A2 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96787 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 19:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96763 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 19:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96755 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 19:34:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:34:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924C042222C for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <790047585.19353.1308512027595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051722#comment-13051722 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7404: --------------------------------- Sunil, (I've not worked with such files, so my analysis _may_ be wrong here -- do let me know if it is) I've found by experience that not all _actual_ file formats are directly suited to HDFS+MapReduce. For your case, how viable do you think it would be to add in transformation phases for pushing such files into HDFS and then pulling them out back in similar formats? For example, lets say you could transform such large files into chunks of relatively-less-large files (of say 2 GB) with as many records as it may accomodate and then load those into HDFS (or do it as you stream, somehow -- you'll know your record end markers and sizes read thus-far). These files can be created with large enough block sizes (2-4 GB is good enough I think, perhaps you could go beyond as well but am not aware of many trying to go beyond the 8 GB block size mark, and we haven't tested that much). This way you achieve the locality you're looking for. Would splitting out your records from such large files into smaller chunks of records per file not be a viable option here? The issue with providing mechanisms to specify offsets is that you have to maintain all the offsets in the NameNode memory instead of having to maintain just a tuple of the number of blocks, length of file and the multiplier used. Not to mention, it could (if not pluggable as a design/impl.) also make things more complex for people who do not really mind using non-record-based splitting. But there's lot of merits here as well, as the other ticket mentions it. > Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sunil Goyal > > Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 > It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: > 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. > 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. > 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). > I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- > 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). > 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). > 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 19 19:52:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A17B42BA for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13851 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 19:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13817 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 19:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13790 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 19:52:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:52:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8924225D4 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1733559157.19367.1308513107367.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051727#comment-13051727 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7404: --------------------------------- Even if you go the padding way, you can add operations when you export processed files outside of Hadoop to get rid of things that would make the file inconsistent. Sure, it would be quite some IO wastage but until you have a new feature that can perhaps ease this, it would work well. Also, have you considered using, or evaluated alternative FSes for the same purpose? Hadoop is designed to work across different FS as well! > Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sunil Goyal > > Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 > It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: > 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. > 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. > 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). > I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- > 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). > 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). > 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 00:40:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56258487E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77012 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 00:40:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76868 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 00:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76780 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 00:40:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:40:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E9422232 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2045427004.19479.1308530387550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <836774115.14005.1304224263168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7254) Programmatically start processes with JMX port open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang resolved HADOOP-7254. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix HDFS-2083 provides the alternative solution which avoids the security issue. > Programmatically start processes with JMX port open > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7254.patch > > > We propose a programmatic way to start processes with JMX enabled. This is the counter part of HDFS-1874. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 01:20:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E502043AF for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8351 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8320 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8311 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BB2422D44 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <951229516.19553.1308532787655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7392.patch > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 01:20:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8A5943BB for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8607 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8582 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8574 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 01:20:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:20:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D0C422D43 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1301554094.19552.1308532787626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Description: Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property to query from server. was: Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName#property to query from server. > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 04:03:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D99A60A7 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96776 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96012 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95995 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 04:03:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:03:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:03:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFBC423489 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <360702556.19709.1308542567701.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7324: ------------------------------------- Description: Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. (was: Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, there are a few users who prefer using Ganglia to collect metrics.) Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Labels: regression (was: ) Issue Type: Bug (was: New Feature) Changing this to accurately reflect the world outside Yahoo!. > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 04:07:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF75A65E3 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99260 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99186 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99169 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 04:07:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:07:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D68042357D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <398939111.19724.1308542807444.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6804) allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051790#comment-13051790 ] Ted Yu commented on HADOOP-6804: -------------------------------- The background was that certain operations are submitted from developer's computer (Eclipse, e.g.) to the cluster which involves impersonation. > allow FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() to execute under specified username > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6804 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6804 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > > When the user calling FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() doesn't have permission to write to certain hdfs path: > Thread [main] (Suspended (exception AccessControlException)) > DFSClient.mkdirs(String, FsPermission) line: 905 > DistributedFileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FsPermission) line: 262 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).mkdirs(Path) line: 1162 > FileUtil.copy(FileSystem, Path, FileSystem, Path, boolean, boolean, Configuration) line: 194 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path, Path) line: 1231 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(boolean, Path, Path) line: 1207 > DistributedFileSystem(FileSystem).copyFromLocalFile(Path, Path) line: 1179 > GridM2mInstallation.copyInputFiles(FlowConfigurations$FlowConf) line: 380 > Passwordless ssh has been setup for current user, tyu, on localhost and user hadoop on hdfs > FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile() should be able to execute using a different username than effective user on localhost so that AccessControlException can be avoided. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 04:21:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9276C19 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3889 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:21:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3665 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3651 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 04:21:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:21:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:21:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A06C423848 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 libhadoop is all or nothing --------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: native Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 Environment: Everything not Linux Reporter: Allen Wittenauer Priority: Blocker As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 04:43:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D69516294 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11784 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:43:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11565 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 04:43:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11557 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 04:43:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:43:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:43:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58284423B6D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <182026872.19742.1308544967357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051796#comment-13051796 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------- It seems the correct answer here is to actually use soversions properly, no? > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 05:02:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBE26588 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19166 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:02:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18946 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18938 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 05:02:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:02:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:02:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735BD423F83 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1021529783.19756.1308546107469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051800#comment-13051800 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------------ That's an interesting idea. How would this work? Are you thinking that during the native load, we detect what soversion got loaded and then base available functionality on that? I was thinking (far) down the road that we could basically dlopen() modules from within libhadoop.so. Then as functionality got ported, one would just drop in the appropriate shared lib. This also makes codec support very interesting: instead of having different bootstrap code for every codec, one could generalize it more than it is today. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 05:36:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 255E96085 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36007 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35759 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 05:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35750 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 05:36:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:36:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:36:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5DD42388F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <159318510.19824.1308548147448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051808#comment-13051808 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------- I'm thinking it would just expect a particular version, and if you have an old version on your system, it should refuse to load with an error logged. Supporting past versions of the .so on new versions of Hadoop is a large matrix to test -- we already do a bad job of testing native code. If there are regressions with regard to OS support, we should catch those by having people with strange OSes testing trunk and voting on releases. Building a complicated framework into the code doesn't seem like the easiest solution to me. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 06:02:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 927B8658B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55367 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:02:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55083 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 06:02:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55042 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 06:02:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:02:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:02:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1B423027 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <689587468.19861.1308549709855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051813#comment-13051813 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------------ Ah, ok. The soversion essentially moves lockstep with a given release. If we were to go to that method, we'd need to split libhadoop in half to fix the regression problem. Granted, it is simple, but it doesn't necessarily prevent the problem that we've found ourselves. Unfortunately, I do not believe anyone on the PMC attempts to run non-Linux on a standard basis. Using release votes to prevent these situations from happening is pretty much a non-starter. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 11:28:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 926926568 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4413 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4370 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4361 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AA6423364 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <681990115.20486.1308569267589.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Work started] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HADOOP-7406 started by Steve Loughran. > Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 11:28:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B1D46578 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4700 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4659 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4644 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 11:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:28:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8116F423362 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster --------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7406 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Steve Loughran Assignee: Steve Loughran Priority: Minor Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 11:30:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96ADE66C1 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10604 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10578 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10570 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BCD4234C0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <518014966.20489.1308569387409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-7406: ----------------------------------- Attachment: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp Initial draft > Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 11:30:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D65CD66D7 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10866 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10821 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10666 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785554234C2 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1831153860.20491.1308569387489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-7406: ----------------------------------- Summary: Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster (was: Add a "I broke the HAdoop build" poster) > Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 11:32:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9595860C1 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12435 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:32:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12402 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 11:32:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12392 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 11:32:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:32:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:32:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F99F4235DA for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1540981593.20497.1308569507388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-7406: ----------------------------------- Component/s: build > Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 12:02:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B198760E4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51931 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51872 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51864 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 12:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:02:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A3142311A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <347427305.20515.1308571309355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051940#comment-13051940 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7406: --------------------------------- I remember there used to be a Gentoo Hall of Shame for people who had done something like {{emerge --unmerge gcc}}. On Gentoo, since all packages require compilation, even gcc, you're left with a locked down OS (no compiler to compile the compiler to get it back). Should we have a hall of shame (ranks too perhaps) for build breakage? ;-) > Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 12:40:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6A0E60CD for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32503 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:40:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32418 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 12:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32410 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 12:40:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:40:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8165B42356B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1358851190.20577.1308573587526.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051954#comment-13051954 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7406: ---------------------------------------- I'm not sure about being that harsh. At work we split things up into build and test -it's OK to break tests for a while, but if you stop things compiling you get the I broke the build poster. You get to keep it until someone else breaks the build, at which point you get to present it and congratulate them on their achievement. > Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 16:15:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD5886B48 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52352 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52290 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52258 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 16:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:15:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AB8424BF4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:14:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1837487126.21065.1308586492200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052033#comment-13052033 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7405: -------------------------------------------- Since Hadoop Kerberos Mac OS X support was never fully there, it is not possible to compile libhadoop due to some compiler errors. Having libhadoop working partially on different platforms does not seem a good idea as it will mislead users to believe that a particular platform is supported when is 'partially' supported. I'd rather go for the principle of least surprise here (all or nothing), this will make Hadoop easier to user. A while ago I've opened a HADOOP-7083 to enable running Hadoop with Kerberos ON without relying on some libhadoop functionality and the argument there was that doing that was a security risk. I'm not arguing for HADOOP-7083 to be considered again, what I'm trying to state is that if we go the partial libhadoop functionality we'll have to come up with a checklist that will have to identify if certain functionality provided by native libs is optional, can hadoop work without it, is a security risk, etc. This will complicate the not only the lives of developers but of users. Because of this my take is that if we require native code to run Hadoop, we should provide the full set of native code for each platform we are building for. Only for functionality that there is Java fallback (at a cost of performance) native-code should be optional. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 16:39:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B6FC6376 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98989 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98951 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98943 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 16:39:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:39:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D363B42479B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2020416957.21150.1308587927862.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: T Jake Luciani (was: issei yoshida) Release Note: (was: This patch bring the snappy compression to Hadoop. It requires the snappy v1.0.2 or higher, Because it doesn't use C++ interface but C interface and loads the snappy native library dynamically via dlopen. Its native library is a part of the libhadoop.) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks T Jake and Issei. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 16:53:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75DEC6D73 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17813 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:53:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17783 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 16:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17771 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 16:53:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:53:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAFC424EA6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <181311564.21227.1308588767388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-310: -------------------------------- Attachment: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch Updated one test assert statement with reason for failure. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 561AD6354 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5188 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5155 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5145 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:35:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3060424303 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ivan Kelly (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7407 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Ivan Kelly Priority: Critical The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... [ivy:resolve] ....................... [ivy:resolve] .................................. [ivy:resolve] ........................................... [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) [ivy:resolve] [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:47:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDAFA63E9 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25763 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25741 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25733 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795A64249D1 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1905111596.21425.1308592009493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reopened HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:47:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E1F56405 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26050 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26001 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25879 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8C64249D5 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <672321241.21428.1308592009576.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7407: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7407.patch > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:47:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70278640D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26070 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26004 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25988 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4BA4249D7 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:46:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2067615753.21430.1308592009633.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7407: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 17:57:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8BB762D7 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47342 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:57:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47293 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 17:57:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47275 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 17:57:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:57:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:57:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0724C424E0A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:56:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1603598428.21489.1308592610025.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052103#comment-13052103 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------------ BTW, who has reviewed the patch? It seems there is no +1 on the patch. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:01:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44C7069E6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52435 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:01:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52334 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52325 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:01:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:01:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:01:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADF342404B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1796278942.21505.1308592848565.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052107#comment-13052107 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- Can we fix #7407 rather than revert this one? looks like a typo. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:05:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CBA56BCB for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63730 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63688 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63636 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96142424234 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1866770488.21562.1308593087611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7407: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur Release Note: I've just committed this. Thanks Alejandro. I manually checked that HDFS and MapReduce both build. Sorry for not doing this earlier. Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:05:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99D0A6BDC for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64010 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63979 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63971 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:05:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBEB424238 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <106127372.21565.1308593087716.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052110#comment-13052110 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7407: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483180/HADOOP-7407.patch against trunk revision 1137690. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/656//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/656//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/656//console This message is automatically generated. > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:07:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18EAF6C71 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66820 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66784 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66775 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:07:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:07:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:07:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4284243CF for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <237665661.21669.1308593211173.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052112#comment-13052112 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- I've committed the fix to HADOOP-7407 after manually verifying it. > BTW, who has reviewed the patch? I reviewed the patch. I marked it as "Reviewed" when committing it. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:13:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D030E6065 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80034 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79975 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79872 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:13:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:13:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3631C42473F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <679321838.21736.1308593568218.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052118#comment-13052118 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------------ bq. Since Hadoop Kerberos Mac OS X support was never fully there, it is not possible to compile libhadoop due to some compiler errors. The compiler errors are fairly simple to fix on Darwin. I don't know why, but it seems like 9 times out of 10, we favor BSD functionality when we go with something non-portable. bg. Because of this my take is that if we require native code to run Hadoop, we should provide the full set of native code for each platform we are building for. Regardless of what happens in this jira, we need a testsuite for the C code anyway. OS X actually proves out that even if the code compiles, it doesn't necessarily mean it works properly. (See HADOOP-7367). bg. A while ago I've opened a HADOOP-7083 to enable running Hadoop with Kerberos ON without relying on some libhadoop functionality and the argument there was that doing that was a security risk. Right. It wanted to create a third security mode where some stuff worked and some stuff didn't. That's not quite what I'm asking for here and it wouldn't actually fix the problem we're hitting anyway. The security functionality is orthogonal to the compression functionality. That's the base, surface issue. Since it is in one big chunk, we broke *both*. (While I guess it wasn't obvious, I should probably state that I'm not looking for a "partially working" security mode. The scope of what constitutes a working unit would still need to be defined. It is more than reasonable to say that all of the functions that are directly security related would need to be ported and treated like one block. Asking libhadoop.so if it "supports security" seems like a reasonable thing to ask it.) The problem that we've got is that we have a lot of unrelated code sitting in libhadoop.so. Every time we add something we run the risk of regressing features out of platforms other than Linux since those other platforms are an afterthought. HADOOP-7206 may actually be a great example of this: if we go with a pure native implementation, we won't be able to support Snappy on anything but Linux with the current state of things. Lack of compression support has a *direct* impact on the client. I'd be surprised if the majority of shops are only using Linux clients. Wouldn't it be great to be able to ask the lib "do you support gzip, do you support snappy, do you support lzo, do you support security, ..."? Then we could add code as needed, do ports as needed, etc. An alternative would be that we start breaking libhadoop up into at least related functionality. I suppose the other outcome might be that we as a community just admit that we don't support Hadoop on anything but Linux and give up on any semblance of portability. More and more code is being added or rewritten in C. I would be surprised if this trend changes. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:17:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEA746827 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84049 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:17:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84013 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:17:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84005 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:17:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:17:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:17:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9686424A84 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <718256822.21772.1308593807756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1149165875.19738.1308543647431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7405) libhadoop is all or nothing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052122#comment-13052122 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7405: ------------------------------------- Allen, if you want to write a patch that adds a call like: boolean isNativeFeatureSupported(long featureCode); ...with a set of enums for various features, I would happily review it. > libhadoop is all or nothing > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7405 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Everything not Linux > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > > As a result of a ton of new code in libhadoop being added in 0.20.203/0.22, a lot of features that used to work no longer do reliably. The most common problem is native compression, but other issues such as Mac OS X's group support broke as well. The native code checks need to be refactored such that libhadoop.so should report what it supports rather than having the Java-side assume that if it loads, it is all supported. This would allow us to stub routines until they've been vetted, removing the chances of such regressions appearing in the future. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:27:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBA076C6E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97658 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97619 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97611 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B7F4240F6 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1850309523.21856.1308594409618.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052129#comment-13052129 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #661 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/661/]) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:27:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E8856C7A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97935 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97889 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97880 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2A042410B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1791153381.21875.1308594410247.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052131#comment-13052131 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7402: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #661 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/661/]) > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:27:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8AEF6C84 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98174 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98145 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98132 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B08542410D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2065651478.21877.1308594410304.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052132#comment-13052132 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7407: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #661 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/661/]) HADOOP-7407. Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. Contributed by Alejandro Abdelnur. tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1137724 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:27:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C06B66C9E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98804 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98796 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:27:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50634240F8 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1312535507.21858.1308594409672.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052130#comment-13052130 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6929: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #661 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/661/]) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:29:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BA3A6ECE for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7089 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7024 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6993 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:29:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:29:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA85C424298 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <208045556.21930.1308594529760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052134#comment-13052134 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------------ > Can we fix #7407 rather than revert this one? looks like a typo. Sure. Thanks. :) > I reviewed the patch. I marked it as "Reviewed" when committing it. Hi Tom, the patch is missing javadoc for the new public classes/methods. That was also a reason that I suggested reverting it. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 18:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50A266788 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19857 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19822 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 18:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19814 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 18:35:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0179424506 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil Goyal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1344120248.21945.1308594887980.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2069949610.19020.1308471647437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7404) Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052139#comment-13052139 ] Sunil Goyal commented on HADOOP-7404: ------------------------------------- Hi Harsh Thanks for your response and giving the feedback for problem. Yes splitting the file into smaller chunks will be a viable option for me. I do not know how much advantage i will get by using it. Let me explain you the problem in more details (may you suggest some better solution for it). Its simplified version will be like this:- Consider I am having a directory having lot of files inside it (20,000 to 1millon). Each file contains the data in the same format (say text). I have created a single file this whole directory (20GB to 100GB). Now I wanted to do some operation on some of these files and again wanted to dump the same file again. If i am able to splitting it by using the offset, Each of this can be processed independently. I can gain the maximum advantage of Hadoop processing nodes. Splitting it according to offset will be useful option for me. If it we can do the splitting of this file according to its offset. It will give the great advantage and remove one extra step. I have no idea about FSes. Can you please point out come documentation link for it. (Unable to get it by google) Thanks Sunil Goyal > Data Blocks Spliting should be record oriented or provided option for give the spliting locations (offsets) as input file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7404 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7404 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sunil Goyal > > Old Bug : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-106 > It is difficult to do the padding in the existing records. Due to the following reason: > 1. Records are having the different Size (some may be bytes, some may be GB) but in same file. > 2. It is having the compatibility issues with the other standard tools. > 3. It will increases the file size without any need of other tools (not working on hadoop). > I think there should be option to this splitting process like this:- > 1. File contains information of offsets where should be splitting done. (like 10,100,120, offset it). > 2. Hadoop should do the splitting according to it ( 10-0 = 10, 100-10 =90 , etc). > 3. This file can be generated easily from the other tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:01:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11F846C1B for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61543 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:01:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61518 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:01:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61510 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:01:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:01:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:01:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A9A424237 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1185307468.22009.1308596447617.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052157#comment-13052157 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- # I think /jmx should preserve the current behavior: list all mbeans, when no parameters are specified. # Need to document the get syntax in the javadoc. # Need to handle cases when property does(n't exist and make sure propertyinfo doesn't cause NPE later. # Need to set the response status to 404 (SC_NOT_FOUND) if the property is not found. > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:05:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCCF36E55 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76688 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76651 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76613 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:05:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:05:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:05:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADB042445F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:04:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <583092230.22051.1308596689434.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052161#comment-13052161 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- Nicholas, I agree that javadoc is needed. Thanks for pointing it out. T Jake, would you like to create a new patch which adds javadoc? I think a new JIRA would be fine. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:43:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E09DC6A0F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61991 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:43:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61915 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61901 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:43:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:43:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:43:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875BE4243EE for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1793256765.22217.1308598967551.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7020: ---------------------------- Attachment: pbh-64-logos.png Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very disappointed. Some of these are very nice clip art but none of them are appropriate powered-by logos, as they are completely illegible at typical logo size: <= 64 pixels in height. My gimpfu is weak, but here is an idea, IMHO, is better than the existing attempts at a "powered by apache logo" in several aspects: # Good continuity with existing Apache and Hadoop logos # Perfectly legible at logo size (64 pixel height) # Theme friendly (looks good on black background as well). > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, hadoop.JPG, pbh-64-logos.png, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:45:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E33BE6C10 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65573 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:45:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65516 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65492 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895FC424510 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1108334668.22242.1308599087559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32237646.17061288907081267.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7020) establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7020: ---------------------------- Attachment: powered-by-apache-hadoop.png A larger png for people to play with. > establish a "Powered by Hadoop" logo > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7020 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: site > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: site > > Attachments: PoweredByApacheHadoop.png, PoweredByHadoop_Small.jpg, hadoop-elephant-pb.jpeg, hadoop.JPG, pbh-64-logos.png, powered-by-apache-hadoop.png, powered-by-hadoop-small.png, powered-by-hadoop.png, powered-by-proposal.jpg, powered_by_hadoop.jpg > > > We should agree on a Powered By Hadoop logo, as suggested in: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#poweredby -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:57:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ED6E6359 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86401 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86366 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86328 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:57:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:57:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:57:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8627C425825 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add javadoc for SnappyCodec --------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7408 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Reporter: T Jake Luciani Priority: Trivial Fix For: 0.23.0 HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:59:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8ADA63CD for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90238 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90173 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90165 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB1D425912 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <89780526.22296.1308599927515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7408: ----------------------------------- Attachment: v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:59:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96AF63E0 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90509 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90463 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90455 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691E6425943 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <194819688.22345.1308599929427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052190#comment-13052190 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- Sure. Added in HADOOP-7408 > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 19:59:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C66C463F2 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90776 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90743 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90735 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 19:59:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:59:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDAF425948 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:58:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2081471578.22350.1308599929573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Jake Luciani updated HADOOP-7408: ----------------------------------- Assignee: T Jake Luciani Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBE616C77 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15634 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15605 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15597 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A220F425F0A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1172254581.22393.1308600767660.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 878726C8D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15960 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15895 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15773 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AF9425F0E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1480045949.22397.1308600767806.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7401.patch) > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:13:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 442366C99 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16471 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16440 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16432 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CD0425F1A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <694609826.22409.1308600768200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-7401.patch > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:13:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B40456CB8 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16797 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16756 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16681 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:13:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1EE425F1E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <709150972.22413.1308600768370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] monica beckwith updated HADOOP-7401: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:15:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB9006D71 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23874 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23847 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23839 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4C2424038 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "monica beckwith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <910028750.22425.1308600887571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052200#comment-13052200 ] monica beckwith commented on HADOOP-7401: ----------------------------------------- Thanks! for the comments. I've updated the patch. I'll post the numbers soon. > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:15:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A1B06D82 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24149 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24090 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23924 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:15:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A13B42403A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1979315054.22427.1308600887628.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052201#comment-13052201 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7408: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483200/v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/657//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/657//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/657//console This message is automatically generated. > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:33:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 001D864F5 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47623 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47545 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47537 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:33:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:33:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:33:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF76A424906 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <77027627.22457.1308601967912.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052206#comment-13052206 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- Do people care about Gangalia 3.0.x? Would Ganglia 3.1+ support suffice? > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 20:35:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E92136DAA for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51540 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51502 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51492 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 20:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29E4249BC for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1421388965.22466.1308602087566.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229925666.15226.1308324167811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7401) Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052210#comment-13052210 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7401: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483202/hadoop-7401.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestGetFileBlockLocations +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/658//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/658//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/658//console This message is automatically generated. > Unit test TestPureJavaCRC32 warmup code warms up the not-so-important loop in PureJavaCRC32.update() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7401 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Solaris-Sparcv9; Solaris-AMD64 > Reporter: monica beckwith > Assignee: monica beckwith > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7401.patch > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > When the warmup code sequence in TestPureJavaCRC32.java is executed, it sends size=len=2 and due to the value of 'trials' in for loop in doBench(), the crc.update() gets run > the compile threshold, thus providing the information that 'while 07' is a cold loop. This brings the MB/s number for len > 7 in PureJavaCRC32.update() way down (e.g. ~28.5% for size=len=65536). > The workaround would be to use size=len=>7 (so just having size=len=2101 ahead of size=len=2 will do the trick) in the warmup section. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:03:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B211F6AE9 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4097 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3966 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3905 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:03:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:03:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:03:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29608424584 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:02:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1516566096.22569.1308603769166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-7206. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Let's fix the javadoc in HADOOP-7408. Thanks T Jake and Tom. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:41:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6209D668E for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78554 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78532 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78524 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:41:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:41:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7569F4244B4 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1822093553.22641.1308606047477.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7408: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7408.patch Looks good. I've updated your patch to annotate SnappyCodec as public evolving (like the other codecs in the package), and to provide a link to the snappy homepage from this class. > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 20 21:55:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DB716F87 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5096 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:55:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5043 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2011 21:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4861 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2011 21:55:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:55:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F06424AE5 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <416007355.22668.1308606887680.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052242#comment-13052242 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7408: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483211/HADOOP-7408.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/659//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/659//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/659//console This message is automatically generated. > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 00:29:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5CB6EA9 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84888 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 00:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84855 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 00:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84846 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 00:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4C442233E for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <665392662.22968.1308616127502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052290#comment-13052290 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7408: ---------------------------------------- +1 > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 01:37:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AA846BBA for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44911 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 01:37:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44885 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 01:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44877 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 01:37:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:37:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:37:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E13D42550F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <401221421.23096.1308620207579.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <18635139.89501293838185702.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7082) Configuration.writeXML should not hold lock while outputting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052309#comment-13052309 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7082: --------------------------------------- bq. Can someone pull this patch into MR-279 branch? Done. > Configuration.writeXML should not hold lock while outputting > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7082 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7082 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7082.txt > > > Common side of HDFS-1542 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 02:01:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 322046444 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63467 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 02:01:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63434 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 02:01:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63426 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 02:01:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:01:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:01:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AD1425AF3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:00:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <411884783.23135.1308621649064.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052315#comment-13052315 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7408: ------------------------------------------------ Why passing conf to the following method? {code} public static boolean isNativeSnappyLoaded(Configuration conf) { return nativeSnappyLoaded; } {code} How about remove {{isNativeSnappyLoaded(..)}} and change {{nativeSnappyLoaded}} to final? > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 02:03:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AAAC43E9 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64236 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64145 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64137 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 02:03:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:03:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:03:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBA1425BF4 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <184822398.23144.1308621767581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052318#comment-13052318 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7408: ------------------------------------------------ Also, could you add {{@Override}} for overriding methods? > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 05:18:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB8F7436B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13336 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 05:18:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13091 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 05:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13045 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 05:18:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:18:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:18:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F44B425494 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bob Liu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <839456896.23368.1308633467583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052352#comment-13052352 ] Bob Liu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- Hello Luke, I think support for Ganglia 3.1.x is suffice... as it's easy to upgrade ganglia from 3.0.x to 3.1.x. By the way, any ETA as to when the ganglia plugins will be available for hadoop-20.203 using metrics v2? > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 06:34:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABE3F418E for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72821 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 06:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71083 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 06:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70922 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 06:34:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:34:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00934425A6D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <779737299.23419.1308638027999.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2144547827.20484.1308569267525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7406) Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052367#comment-13052367 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7406: -------------------------------------------- +1 Steve. > Add a "I broke the Hadoop build" poster > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7406 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7406 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Minor > Attachments: breaking_the_hadoop_build.odp > > > Some people have been known to check in code that does not work, and hence break the build. These people (and I may be one of them) deserve to have their contribution acknowledged with an "I broke the build" poster. I have a draft slide for this, using an upside down copy of the logo. It may be A4 paper, when US-letter is probably more appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 09:29:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8D90469F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:29:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28224 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28216 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 09:29:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:29:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920EC425066 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <933619452.23812.1308648528595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7395: -------------------------------- Attachment: Hadoop_7395 > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop_7395 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 09:41:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 296A4411B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49296 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49256 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49248 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 09:41:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A041425864 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:40:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <777363857.23855.1308649248037.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7395: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Fix this issue. The error message is as the following after the patch is done: [Could not find group FileSystemCounters_err] <--incorrect group name or [Could not find counter FILE_BYTES_READ_err in the group FileSystemCounters] <--incorrect counter name > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop_7395 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 09:45:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 941CB42D8 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52812 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:45:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52739 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52731 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 09:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BECE425A3F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1312331457.23859.1308649487504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052444#comment-13052444 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7395: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483256/Hadoop_7395 against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/660//console This message is automatically generated. > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop_7395 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 10:39:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B94849F4 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53300 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53192 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53176 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE042568F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vitalii Tymchyshyn (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1042435816.23959.1308652727549.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vitalii Tymchyshyn updated HADOOP-7294: --------------------------------------- Attachment: patch.diff This is patch for 0.21 release. I did a branch in my own svn, so revisions are off. > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > Attachments: patch.diff > > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 10:39:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B8E849F3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53318 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53194 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53182 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81C425696 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vitalii Tymchyshyn (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <151652946.23965.1308652727769.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vitalii Tymchyshyn updated HADOOP-7294: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > Attachments: patch.diff > > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 10:45:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 695024DAC for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60437 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60364 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60356 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:45:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7EE4259E0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:44:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1177074488.23980.1308653088310.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052466#comment-13052466 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7294: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483262/patch.diff against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/661//console This message is automatically generated. > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > Attachments: patch.diff > > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:08:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B92140AD for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92141 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:08:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92106 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92016 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:08:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DC44268D8 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <28913034.24893.1308676067721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052662#comment-13052662 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- bq. I think support for Ganglia 3.1.x is suffice... as it's easy to upgrade ganglia from 3.0.x to 3.1.x. Thanks. That's good to know. I'll try to provide a patch for 204+ and a small hadoop-ganglia31-0.20.203.jar, which can be put into the lib directory of the 0.20.203 release (as is, no patch for 203 is needed), hopefully, sometime this week, to appease the wrath of Allen ;) > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:26:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89D2D4EB5 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31014 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:26:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30981 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30973 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:26:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:26:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E80C426CF5 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:25:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1875258417.25075.1308677148252.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7409) TestTFileByteArrays is failing on Hudson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 TestTFileByteArrays is failing on Hudson ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7409 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7409 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Fix For: 0.23.0 This test has failed in the last 4 nightly builds, as seen here: https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/ I can't reproduce this failure on my machine, running the test either in isolation or as part of the full suite. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 813254D19 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61630 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61537 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60536 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:34:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:34:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18EA426446 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <642991329.25148.1308677627854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7410) Mavenize common RPM/DEB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Mavenize common RPM/DEB ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-7410 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7410 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur Mavenize RPM/DEB generation -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:36:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8A684DA1 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68771 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:36:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68707 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68688 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:36:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:36:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CE842674B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1635687927.25170.1308677750532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7411) Convert remaining Ant based build to Maven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Convert remaining Ant based build to Maven ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7411 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7411 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur Once Mavenization is complete, do a second iteration to remove antrun calls out, this may require writing some Mojos. The tricky things are native compilation and symlinks handling (for native libs) when creating packaging. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:38:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D821A4E3B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72996 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72953 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72944 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA47D42694F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1221804712.25214.1308677867694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7412) Mavenization Umbrella MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Mavenization Umbrella --------------------- Key: HADOOP-7412 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur Umbrella JIRA for all Mavenization JIRAs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:38:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFD054E6B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73430 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73388 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73329 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:38:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7805426953 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <737643372.25218.1308677867879.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: HADOOP-7412 > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 17:50:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 727BF49C0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4974 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:50:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4945 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4937 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:50:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:50:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:50:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35FA42611A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1565148226.25330.1308678587993.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1221804712.25214.1308677867694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7412) Mavenization Umbrella MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052706#comment-13052706 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7412: -------------------------------------------- Sub-Tasks (JIRAS from other projects cannot be linked as sub-tasks): * HADOOP-6671 * HDFS-2096 * MAPREDUCE-2607 * MAPREDUCE-2608 * HDFS-2097 * HADOOP-7410 * MAPREDUCE-2609 * HDFS-2098 * HADOOP-7411 > Mavenization Umbrella > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7412 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > > Umbrella JIRA for all Mavenization JIRAs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 18:20:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2738A41D3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73157 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73122 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73104 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:20:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:20:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0C8426794 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1838991128.25538.1308680388508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671-j.patch rebasing to trunks HEAD (needed because of new snappy dependency) > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671-j.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 18:24:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B214B425E for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78144 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78108 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78099 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:24:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:24:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:24:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A9E426A1B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1156896389.25602.1308680628159.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052738#comment-13052738 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483320/HADOOP-6671-j.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 57 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/662//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671-j.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:12:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BACB14C29 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75687 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:12:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75600 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:12:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75562 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:12:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:12:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:12:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6EB42760A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:11:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7413 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Components: build Reporter: Tom White Assignee: Tom White We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:18:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B214A25 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85515 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:18:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85485 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85477 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:18:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:18:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9D442788C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <44335180.25917.1308687467502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7413: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7413.patch > Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7413.patch > > > We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:22:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9A8B4604 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95171 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:22:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95077 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95069 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:22:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:22:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:22:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967C24279C5 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <459710720.25924.1308687707613.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7413: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7413.patch > > > We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 20:36:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E26DA4F57 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23022 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:36:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22978 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 20:36:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 20:36:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:36:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:36:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680FC427FFE for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <758041738.25971.1308688547422.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052812#comment-13052812 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7413: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483337/HADOOP-7413.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/663//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/663//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/663//console This message is automatically generated. > Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7413.patch > > > We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 21:16:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CEA04D4F for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95928 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95888 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95880 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:16:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:16:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:16:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53BB4275C2 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <891494169.26162.1308690947738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052838#comment-13052838 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7413: ------------------------------------- Wrong patch? This just adds a line to CHANGES.txt > Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7413.patch > > > We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 21:24:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C80374626 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10339 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:24:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10307 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:24:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10299 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:24:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:24:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:24:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2C6427ADC for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1253294286.26213.1308691427431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1920700328.25899.1308687109191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7413) Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052846#comment-13052846 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7413: ----------------------------------- This is just a test patch for the new Jenkins job to try out. > Create Jenkins build for Maven patch testing > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7413 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-7413.patch > > > We need an equivalent of https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build for the Maven build. Until this is live it would be triggered manually and wouldn't post comments to JIRA. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16606-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 21:54:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D73DE43F0 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68629 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:54:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68602 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:54:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68593 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:54:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:54:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:54:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD7E427A0B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:53:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Roman Shaposhnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <724598187.26360.1308693229577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052867#comment-13052867 ] Roman Shaposhnik commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ I'd be curious to find out whether the lack of Solaris binaries in the /org/xerial/snappy/native/ bothers anybody: http://maven.xerial.org/repository/artifact/org/xerial/snappy/snappy-java/1.0.3-rc3/snappy-java-1.0.3-rc3.jar > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16607-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 21 22:18:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D3D64DD1 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 849 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 22:18:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 799 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 22:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 670 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 22:18:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:18:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A200427647 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <823265396.26495.1308694669562.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052888#comment-13052888 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ With the current state of trunk, native compression only works on Linux anyway without reworking the entire libhadoop structure. See HADOOP-7405. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16608-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 00:05:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D160E4D50 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17267 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 00:05:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17217 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 00:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17109 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 00:05:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:05:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:05:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD05042738C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1977530863.26762.1308701087902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052955#comment-13052955 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Sorry, I stopped paying attention to this for a while... I have some concerns about the way this ended up: We're now pulling in a jar which autoexpands its .so dependency into /tmp and then loads native libraries that way. That's (a) messy, (b) potentially insecure without workarounds to change /tmp to some other dir, and (c) inconsistent with how native libraries work. These are the same arguments Alejandro made above This maven artifact that we now depend on is something that isn't easy to rebuild, and it's not even clear how it gets build. For example, which glibc version is it linked against? Which OSX version is the included dylib built on? Seems a little scary as a dependency It seems the motivation to switch from the hadoop-snappy approach to the java-snappy approach was that the former approach depended on having snappy.so available at runtime, which isn't always the case. I would propose the following: - at build time, you can choose (a) disable snappy, (b) enable snappy and dynamically link our JNI shims against snappy.so, or (c) enable snappy and statically link against snappy.so - those who don't care about snappy choose (a) - those who care about snappy and plan to deploy on systems where libsnappy.so is deployed system-wide (eg fedora or most recent ubuntu) can choose (b) to pick up the snappy lib off the system - those who care about snappy and plan to deploy elsewhere choose (c), and just make sure that snappy is available at compile time Then the hadoopsnappy.so can be included in lib/native just like our other native dependencies without the unjar-to-tmp hackery. Does this idea address everyone's goals? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16609-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 00:33:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA5754151 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55278 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 00:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55252 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 00:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55244 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 00:33:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:33:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:33:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED19427C0D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1714646631.26863.1308702767581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052971#comment-13052971 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- I think so. Seems like we could get away with (a) and (b) for now. Ie those who care about snappy and plan to deploy elsewhere could reasonably use dynamic linking as well. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16610-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 01:21:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CA7E4504 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89910 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89867 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89858 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 01:21:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:21:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:21:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA754279E9 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:20:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2010151044.26991.1308705648183.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13052984#comment-13052984 ] XieXianshan commented on HADOOP-7395: ------------------------------------- -1 This issue should be created in project Map/Reduce. > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop_7395 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16611-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 01:23:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A019453B for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91389 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91347 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91339 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F41427AA1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <397423626.26993.1308705767402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <740424940.5878.1308116867420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7395) The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7395: -------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > The infomation returned by the wrong usage of the command "job -counter "is not appropriate > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7395 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Yan Jinshuang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop_7395 > > > When use the command "job -counter " with wrong group-name or wrong counter-name(with correct job-id), the result is always 0. It is better to show the user the detail, like "illegal group-name", "illegal counter-name", etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16612-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 03:23:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAC956AEE for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99293 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 03:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98507 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 03:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98492 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 03:23:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED42427172 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1623316998.27187.1308712967581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053019#comment-13053019 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Let me clarify some differences between Issay's hadoop-snappy and my snappy-java: hadoop-snappy * Uses libsnappy.so (available in recent Linux distributions) and libhadoopsnappy.so (JNI code compiled for the target platform) snappy-java * Uses libsnappyjava.so (mixing up the original snappy and JNI code), or snappyjava.dll (for Windows), libsnappyjava.jnilib (for Mac OS X) * It copies one of the native library to the directory specified in org.xerial.snappy.tempdir or java.io.tempdir system property. * If the dependencies to the glibc (in Linux GLIBC2.3 or higher is required for now) and dylib (in Mac OS X) cause some problems, you can re-compile snappy-java's native library only for your own platform (with make clean-native native). No need to care about building native libraries for the other platforms if you never use them. The same thing between hadoop-snappy and snappy-java is: * Both approaches need to compile the native code (libhadoopsnappy.so or libsnappyjava.so) somewhere. My snappy-java simply provides pre-compiled libsnappyjava.so for various platforms. One of the design goals of snappy-java is to avoid troubles in linking against native libraries (e.g., libsnappy.so), such as crashes due to libstdc++ compatibility, missing libraries, etc. But as Alejandro suggested in my discussion group, using separate libsnappy.so and libsnapyjava.so is technically possible even in snappy-java: * First, tries to load pre-installed libsnappy.so and libsnappyjava.so (the version not containing libsnappy.so) * If not found, extract these libraries embedded in the JAR to somewhere. * Load both native libraries. I am not sure supporting such loading mechanism is a right way to go. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16613-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 05:56:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFC365C5 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93121 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92867 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92842 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BDB428FF1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7414 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Benjamin Reed Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16614-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 05:56:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F25E365F3 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94647 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93117 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92869 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 05:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:56:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A5B428FF3 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1043495529.27448.1308722147487.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin Reed updated HADOOP-7414: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7414.patch > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16615-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 06:02:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F7F62DE for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3070 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 06:02:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2594 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 06:02:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 06:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:02:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962BF427396 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1442157395.27476.1308722509611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin Reed updated HADOOP-7414: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16616-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 07:35:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 933626F99 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29154 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 07:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28162 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 07:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28126 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 07:35:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:35:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:35:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4494289CF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2114464655.27701.1308728088321.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053098#comment-13053098 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7414: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483406/HADOOP-7414.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/664//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/664//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/664//console This message is automatically generated. > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16617-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 12:13:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0833B6F0C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49052 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 12:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48202 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 12:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47822 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 12:13:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:13:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:13:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C708428366 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rajesh Kumar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <992091594.29217.1308744767506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7415) Isolation Runner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Isolation Runner ---------------- Key: HADOOP-7415 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7415 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Environment: Using ubuntu machine Reporter: Rajesh Kumar I am running Isolation Runner. I followed the procedure given in the book Hadoop The Definitive Guide. But it is giving : Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16618-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 17:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC1A61E1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 17:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2919 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 17:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2900 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 17:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889D1429BC8 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <748340618.29869.1308762767556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053344#comment-13053344 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-310: --------------------------------------- Hey Brock, thanks a lot for reviving this issue (after 5 years!) I have a few small concerns about this patch: # The constructor which only takes a {{byte[]}} can now be implemented in terms of this new constructor you've introduced. # We now have {{set(byte[] bytes, int length)}} and {{set(byte[] bytes, int offset, int length)}}, which differ not only in signature, but in their semantics with respect to copying of the input data. This seems like it might lead to confusion. Perhaps we should name the new method something like {{setDirect(...)}}? Or perhaps we should amend the existing {{set(...)}} method to not do a copy? The latter is obviously a trickier and backward-incompatible change, but probably clearer. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16619-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 23:09:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D6BD6E17 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64402 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:09:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64375 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:09:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64348 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 23:09:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:09:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:09:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17034296EB for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:08:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <330737614.30743.1308784130854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7416) Allow test-patch to work with cross sub-project changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allow test-patch to work with cross sub-project changes ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7416 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7416 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Now that the sub-projects are sub-directories in the same repo, we can make {{test-patch.sh}} not barf on cross-project patches. We would need to make {{smart-apply-patch.sh}} not fail hard when it detects this, and probably make {{test-patch.sh}} run all the validation checks against all affected sub-projects. This was inspired by HDFS-1900, which changes a config in Common that's referenced in a bunch of places in HDFS. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16620-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 23:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9998A6300 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24874 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24824 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24810 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:35:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B9D4291A9 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2104918972.30802.1308785688212.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053540#comment-13053540 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7414: ---------------------------------------- Hey Ben, does Jetty mind if there are multiple slashes at the end of the path? That's the only potential problem I can imagine with this patch. Also, is there a way to write a unit test for this? > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16621-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 23:47:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85F0A623A for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50463 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:47:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50431 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:47:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50423 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 23:47:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:47:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:47:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1A6429643 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jongwook Woo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1045246622.30828.1308786407767.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <639440876.5515.1308103967395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7394) Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053547#comment-13053547 ] Jongwook Woo commented on HADOOP-7394: -------------------------------------- It is because Forrest 0.9 does not have 'fop-0.20.5.jar' that has the class 'org/apache/fop/messaging/MessageHandler' You may check them out, for example, in my Forrest 0.9: jongwook@localhost:~/apache/apache-forrest-0.9/lib/core$ ls *fop* cocoon-fop-block.jar In my Forrest 0.8: jongwook@localhost:~/apache/apache-forrest-0.8/lib/core$ ls *fop* cocoon-fop-block-2.2.0-dev.jar fop-0.20.5.jar fop-0.20.5.jar.license.txt > Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7394 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7394 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Minor > > Running {{ant cn-docs}} with Forrest 0.8 will work. Running the same thing with Forrest 0.9 prints the following error: > {noformat} > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/messaging/MessageHandler > at org.apache.cocoon.serialization.FOPSerializer.configure(FOPSerializer.java:122) > at org.apache.avalon.framework.container.ContainerUtil.configure(ContainerUtil.java:201) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.DefaultComponentFactory.newInstance(DefaultComponentFactory.java:289) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.newPoolable(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:655) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.get(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:371) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.PoolableComponentHandler.doGet(PoolableComponentHandler.java:198) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ComponentHandler.get(ComponentHandler.java:381) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ExcaliburComponentSelector.select(ExcaliburComponentSelector.java:215) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.ExtendedComponentSelector.select(ExtendedComponentSelector.java:268) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.AbstractProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractProcessingPipeline.java:311) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java:171) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SerializeNode.invoke(SerializeNode.java:120) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:103) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:47) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PreparableMatchNode.invoke(PreparableMatchNode.java:131) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.MountNode.invoke(MountNode.java:118) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:98) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) > at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.process(Cocoon.java:699) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonWrapper.getPage(CocoonWrapper.java:514) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.processTarget(CocoonBean.java:499) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.process(CocoonBean.java:356) > at org.apache.cocoon.Main.main(Main.java:321) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.fop.messaging.MessageHandler > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) > ... 38 more > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16622-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 22 23:53:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABB756D9E for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57239 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57208 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 23:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57176 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 23:53:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:53:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:53:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBE84297F2 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7417 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Environment: Java 6, Linux Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16623-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 00:31:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70F6668C7 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96491 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96437 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96427 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41DC4276CF for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1445041033.30924.1308789047931.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reassigned HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur (was: T Jake Luciani) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16624-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 00:31:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33CAE6927 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97101 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97015 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96925 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB8E427729 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Look (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1931919786.30989.1308789050585.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Look updated HADOOP-7418: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16625-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 00:31:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2BD2695E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97427 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97402 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97391 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1AD427723 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Look (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1307013660.30983.1308789050171.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Look moved HDFS-1460 to HADOOP-7418: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: hdfs client) Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Key: HADOOP-7418 (was: HDFS-1460) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16626-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 00:31:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EE8B698B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97882 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97853 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97845 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:31:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:31:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47BE42772D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:30:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Look (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <763408194.30992.1308789050670.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Look updated HADOOP-7418: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16627-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 00:45:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 291A26EC3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17444 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:45:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17368 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17223 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:45:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:45:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:45:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF9427D17 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1174146062.31024.1308789887610.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053570#comment-13053570 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7418: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483526/HDFS-1460.txt against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/665//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/665//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/665//console This message is automatically generated. > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16628-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:03:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55930680E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36625 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:03:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36591 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36583 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:03:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:03:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A307442A26A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:02:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1965117194.31128.1308790969664.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reopened HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- After mulling over this issue a bit more, reading a few times Todd's comment and asking around to folks that deal with nativelibs I'm having second thoughts about the committed patch based on snappy-java. The snappy-java approach is tempting because it 'just works' (without having to install snappy SO in your system). However, it has a serious drawback; the native code is not built in target OS, only on the same architecture. Because of this the build is not easy reproducible as there is not knowledge of the OS used to build it. In addition, this can lead to not avail dependencies in the running OS. The hadoop-snappy approach has the drawback that it requires an additional step (to install snappy SO in the platform), but as benefits it takes care of the drawbacks of the snappy-java approach; the native code is built in the target OS. Thus, resulting on easy reproducible builds. Furthermore the drawback is transient, until snappy is avail the different OSes by default or OS driven updates. A secondary issue is that snappy-java nativelib statically links snappy. As snappy SO makes it to standard Linux distributions, snappy-java will use a private copy of it instead using the one installed in the OS. On the other hand, hadoop-snappy SO dynamically links snappy SO, when snappy SO is available in the OS, it could be consumed directly from it. (this could be taken care by snappy-java if it changes to dynamically link snappy SO). Because of this I'd like to revert the snappy-java based patch and go for Issay's hadoop-snappy patch. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16629-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:09:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB2326EDE for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39544 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:09:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39508 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39497 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:09:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:09:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:09:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7083142A463 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:08:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2114160641.31189.1308791329457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053579#comment-13053579 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- bq. However, it has a serious drawback; the native code is not built in target OS, only on the same architecture. Because of this the build is not easy reproducible as there is not knowledge of the OS used to build it. In addition, this can lead to not avail dependencies in the running OS. Why not let snappy-java implement the (check for libsnappy.so on the system before using the bundled one) as Taro mentioned? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16630-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:23:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03FB96713 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56710 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56680 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56667 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8463842A82B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <227471532.31221.1308792167539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053586#comment-13053586 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- @Jake snappy-java does not load vanilla snappy SO, it loads snappy-java SO which is a combination of snappy SO + the JNI bindings for Java. Assuming that snappy-java splits the snappy & snappy-java native code in 2 SOs as I suggested before in the snappy-java alias (and Taro is not convinced of that approach, see the end of his comment) ... snappy SO would be loaded from the system but snappy-java SO would still be loaded from the JAR. This would mean that not avail dependencies could still happen for the snappy-java SO. And, if you want to have a snappy-java SO build for your OS, you'd have build it yourself but still consume the JAR that comes an external dependency. IMO this is a big NO NO. I rather have some extra setup work until snappy SO as commonly available with the OSes. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16631-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:31:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C1D6DDB for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64627 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64576 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64568 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:31:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7785642AAE9 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1423692780.31287.1308792647486.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053590#comment-13053590 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- bq. However, it has a serious drawback; the native code is not built in target OS, only on the same architecture. Because of this the build is not easy reproducible as there is not knowledge of the OS used to build it. Sure it is reproducible. snappy is used as an artifact, not built from source. The build is reproducible because it _always_ uses the same artifact, and always produces the same output. Is it a requirement to recompile all Java jars to be reproducible? hadoop-snappy has another drawback/benefit pair: Users may have snappy-java in their paths for their own use (for example via Avro, Hive, Hbase, or user code). Drawback: the library can't be shared, bloating the # of classes and jars Benefit: the library won't have a version conflict Unknown(to me): does a snappy-java binding conflict with a hadoop custom one if both are loaded in the same JVM / Classloader? I think the check for a system available libsnappy.so prior to loading the one in the jar should go into the snappy-java project, then users can optionally compile one and make it available to Hadoop, or use the one in the jar, and Hadoop has to maintain less code and build infrastructure as a result. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16632-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:39:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FEE46F05 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75293 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:39:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75258 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75250 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:39:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:39:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C063942ACB9 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1672174058.31349.1308793127784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053592#comment-13053592 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- @Scott, snappy-java downloads snappy source TAR and builds it. Regarding to your 'unknown' last time I've check, snappy-java SO and snappy SO could not be loaded at the same time in a JVM, the JVM would core dump. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16633-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:41:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FA4F6F86 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77680 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77640 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77632 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:41:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:41:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3C642AE45 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:40:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1000923173.31461.1308793249501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053595#comment-13053595 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- bq. IMO this is a big NO NO. I rather have some extra setup work until snappy SO as commonly available with the OSes. This may happen with Linux and BSD within a couple years, but likely will never happen for anything else. snappy-java will be in user classpaths anyway. I doubt every other project will go with this method (and if they did, the work should be shared, not in Hadoop. If we feel strongly that snappy-java is doing it wrong, fork it into a new project and let everyone benefit!). Other projects without the manpower to maintain this will just use snappy-java as is. Avro has done this already and I'm sure others will too. Including a jar as a dependency and having it 'just work' for 99% of users is an easy win. Especially since Snappy is an optional compression codec for the vast majority of use cases. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16634-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 01:45:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F2EA6113 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81630 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81577 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 01:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81568 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 01:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7298A42AF7A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1859066644.31467.1308793487466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053598#comment-13053598 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- bq. Regarding to your 'unknown' last time I've check, snappy-java SO and snappy SO could not be loaded at the same time in a JVM, the JVM would core dump. -1 to coredumps. I already have snappy-java in my classpath in M/R jobs. bq. snappy-java downloads snappy source TAR and builds it. Ah, you mean that snappy-java's build is not reproducible. Yes, I agree. I thought you meant that _Hadoop_ was not reproducible if it used snappy-java. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16635-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 02:37:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 772054D0A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33812 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33445 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33348 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 02:37:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:37:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D442AC9C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <260680014.31562.1308796607690.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053607#comment-13053607 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- @Scott @Alejandro Current version of snappy-java-1.0.3-rc3 can load libsnappy.so and libsnappyjava.so at the same time. I fixed the build options to avoid collision of snappy API between two native libraries. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16636-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 02:49:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8672C469E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48443 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:49:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48213 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:49:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48103 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 02:49:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:49:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:49:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E5742A24A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <353583839.31630.1308797327622.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053610#comment-13053610 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- I noticed that reusing libsnappy.so between multiple java libraries is not a good approach since JVM cannot load the same native libraries twice. If Hadoop loads libsnappy.so, the other third-party libraries cannot use libsnappy.so unless Snappy API used in the initial loader (i.e. Hadoop) is exposed to the users. Although I haven't fully confirmed that co-existence of libsnappy.so and libsnappyjava.so does not cause any serious problems, if this approach works well, Hadoop should integrate Issay's hadoop-snappy, which uses pre-installed libsnappy.so. The other Hadoop users can use snappy-java by simply putting the jar into their class path. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16637-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 02:51:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3700F46D8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50088 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:51:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49937 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:51:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49909 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 02:51:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:51:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:51:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6200F42A430 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:50:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <165092060.31734.1308797449398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053611#comment-13053611 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ How does this work with 32-bit vs. 64-bit? You push different jars? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16638-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 02:55:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CF2D47F4 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56699 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:55:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55217 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 02:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54850 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 02:55:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:55:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:55:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FF742A691 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 02:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1275154176.31753.1308797687230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053615#comment-13053615 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- @Allen snappy-java checks os.arch system property, which shows different values for 32 and 64 bit CPUs. In a single snappy-java's jar file, native libraries for both 32 and 64 bits CPUs are bundled, and one of them is extracted according to the machine environment. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16639-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 03:01:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7735D4011 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64039 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:01:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63599 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63551 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 03:01:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:01:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:01:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E2142AA10 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <416318956.31838.1308798048098.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053622#comment-13053622 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Would it be reasonable to split snappy-java up into multiple maven modules, so that users can choose which parts they want? Perhaps they want the Java portions, but none of the JNI, or want the JNI wrapper but not the implementation, etc. A snappy-java could still be built with all artifacts bundled, but a la carte could also be chosen without a custom build of snappy-java. I think it is best for users if as many use cases as possible were handled in one central library that could be shared by multiple projects. Any work done for Hadoop is likely to be repeated elsewhere. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16640-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 03:02:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3AE347DD for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66984 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:02:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65954 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65918 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 03:02:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:02:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:02:15 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9B342AB0D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:01:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1296559745.31895.1308798114502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053624#comment-13053624 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ How safe is os.arch on non-Sun JVMs? How safe are the .so's on non-Sun JVMs? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16641-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 03:29:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3E944B2A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85996 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:29:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85752 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85714 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 03:29:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:29:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:29:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2985C42A0F4 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:28:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <835713009.32012.1308799729166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053629#comment-13053629 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- @Scott JNI interface is tightly coupled with the Java code, so splitting Java/JNI/native libraries would not work as you expected. A reasonable option I can think of is to provide snappy-java without native libraries. In this case, users need to compile/install snappy-java's native library (make install to copy libsnappy.so to /usr/local/lib) and a jar file without native libraries. This style fits to users who need to compile everything from scratch. Snappy-java tries to load native libraries in the path specified in java.library.path if no bundled native library is found. @Allen I am not familiar with non-Sun JVMs, but loading .so files depends only on locally installed library (GLIBC 2.3 or higher). No other dependencies exists in pre-compiled native libraries (for Linix) in snappy-java, because I carefully chosen the compilation options to avoid extra dependencies. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16642-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 03:31:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A02C41DF for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91226 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:31:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88747 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 03:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88712 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 03:31:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:31:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C19442A17C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <453507571.32015.1308799847504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053631#comment-13053631 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Fix: make install to copy -libsnappy.so- *libsnappyjava.so* to /usr/local/lib > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16643-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:36:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F79544B8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57221 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56982 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56961 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:36:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:36:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A4042A085 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:35:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <779082057.32108.1308803748220.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7419) new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers moved HDFS-2089 to HADOOP-7419: ---------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Key: HADOOP-7419 (was: HDFS-2089) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Bing Zheng > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-2089.txt > > > Since the introduction of the RPM packages, hadoop-config.sh incorrectly puts $HADOOP_HDFS_HOME/conf on the classpath regardless of whether HADOOP_CONF_DIR is already defined in the environment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16644-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:38:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8326E44DB for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57768 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57555 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57546 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:38:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722F342A14F for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1343724135.32113.1308803867464.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7419) new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7419: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-2089.txt Re-uploading the same patch to re-trigger test-patch. > new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Bing Zheng > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-2089.txt, HDFS-2089.txt > > > Since the introduction of the RPM packages, hadoop-config.sh incorrectly puts $HADOOP_HDFS_HOME/conf on the classpath regardless of whether HADOOP_CONF_DIR is already defined in the environment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16645-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:44:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E4DC4544 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62040 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61906 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61858 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:44:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:44:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:44:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A5542A277 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <77760834.32122.1308804227798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053648#comment-13053648 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Regarding the conflicts, it seems this is a visibility bug. In the case that the snappy code gets compiled into the same .so file as the JNI bindings, it should be set up with -fvisibility=hidden, and only the JNI implementations of native functions marked as exported symbols. Anything else is pretty unclean. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16646-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:50:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85EA14BAA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68169 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67981 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:50:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67966 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:50:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:50:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:50:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D6A42A461 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1445204711.32183.1308804587405.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053651#comment-13053651 ] Benjamin Reed commented on HADOOP-7414: --------------------------------------- the only way there would be multiple slashes is if the name was "" or had a slash at the end of it. i don't think we hit either case. note that there is a corresponding bug report in jetty: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-1307 the test case would need to run hadoop with the webapps in a jar file. i don't know of any easy way to do that. > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16647-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:54:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D2C4BF3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69167 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68912 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68860 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:16 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2780D42A5D1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:53:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1086435038.32237.1308804836158.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053652#comment-13053652 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- @Todd As you mentioned, snappy-java's native libraries are now built with -fvisibility=hidden, and I already tried to load libsnappy.so, then used API in snappy-java. No JVM crash is observed. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16648-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 04:54:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2F1C4BFE for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69254 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69169 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68861 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 04:54:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:54:16 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B5E42A5D3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:53:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1846313595.32239.1308804836212.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7419) new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053653#comment-13053653 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7419: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483545/HDFS-2089.txt against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/666//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/666//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/666//console This message is automatically generated. > new hadoop-config.sh doesn't manage classpath for HADOOP_CONF_DIR correctly > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7419 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Bing Zheng > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-2089.txt, HDFS-2089.txt > > > Since the introduction of the RPM packages, hadoop-config.sh incorrectly puts $HADOOP_HDFS_HOME/conf on the classpath regardless of whether HADOOP_CONF_DIR is already defined in the environment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16649-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 08:38:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A99C41A6 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10579 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10375 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B38242A815 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1526226641.32635.1308818271501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053713#comment-13053713 ] issei yoshida commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Taro, > I noticed that reusing libsnappy.so between multiple java libraries is not a good approach since JVM cannot load the same native libraries twice. The patch I uploaded before loads libsnappy.so via dlopen in the native code, so it probably isn't a problem. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16650-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 08:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AF7941AA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11053 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10768 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10340 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 08:38:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:38:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7AD42A7CD for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:37:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <778872678.32582.1308818269244.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053712#comment-13053712 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7414: ---------------------------------------- I had a look through the Jetty source on this, then into jar: URLs, and ended up more confused than ever, so exchanged emails with Greg Wilkins, because it seemed to me that WAR files were overkill compared to creating and configuring a servlet context. His reply "I tend to agree that Hadoop should not be using WebAppContext, as that drags in all the war mechanisms of special classloaders, security, sessions etc. that I suspect that hadoop does not need. It would be more light weight to program at the ContextHandler level and add only the handlers that you need (probably just ServletHandler). If you are interested, I can point you at the jetty embedded examples. For this specific issue, adding a / to the end of the path does suggest to jetty that it is a directory rather than a WAR file. If it is a WAR file, then you don't need the /. The extraction into temp files is controlled by the setExtractWar method on WebAppContext and not the trailing /" What is trying to be achieved here? To deploy some servlets in the Hadoop JVM? off the normal classpath? If so, I don't think WebApp contexts are the right way. Jetty's context handling may seem a bit trickier to write, but I use them in-JVM regularly and don't have many problems (many - the main one was SLF4J, but I fixed that) > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16651-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 10:45:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B17F4C10 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93345 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93051 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92860 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 10:45:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825BD42AAA1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Pushparaj (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1647765621.32935.1308825887530.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7420) HDFS package reference throws error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org HDFS package reference throws error ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7420 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7420 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: Build Reporter: Pushparaj I have referenced this package in my Java code. The project needs to be compiled using JDK 1.5 compiler only. The Hadoop reference throws error from javac as below. [javac] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 Note: If compiled using Java 1.6 , it goes through. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16652-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 11:45:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4D1D4717 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82907 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 11:45:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82880 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 11:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82872 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 11:45:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:45:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:45:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E51642B3DC for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uparis Abeysena (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956559103.33015.1308829487448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1224) "Browse the filesystem" link pointing to a dead data-node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053803#comment-13053803 ] Uparis Abeysena commented on HADOOP-1224: ----------------------------------------- results see: http://retractable-dog-leashes.net > "Browse the filesystem" link pointing to a dead data-node > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1224 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1224 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: DFSBrowsingDeadNode_v1.0.patch, DFSBrowsingDeadNode_v1.1.patch, DFSBrowsingDeadNode_v1.2.patch > > > On the NameNode status web page "Browse the filesystem" link can point to a dead data-node. > The reason for that is that FSNamesystem.randomDataNode() selects a random node from the > list of all nodes rather then selecting among alive nodes only. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16653-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 14:32:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53162466B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50508 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50452 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50334 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7319F42BD41 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1947269000.33382.1308839508468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1635687927.25170.1308677750532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7411) Convert remaining Ant based build to Maven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reassigned HADOOP-7411: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Convert remaining Ant based build to Maven > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7411 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7411 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > > Once Mavenization is complete, do a second iteration to remove antrun calls out, this may require writing some Mojos. > The tricky things are native compilation and symlinks handling (for native libs) when creating packaging. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16654-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 14:32:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B722C46A3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51130 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51096 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51084 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 14:32:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:32:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC7942BD32 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1813883862.33368.1308839507831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1221804712.25214.1308677867694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7412) Mavenization Umbrella MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur reassigned HADOOP-7412: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Mavenization Umbrella > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7412 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > > Umbrella JIRA for all Mavenization JIRAs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16655-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 15:08:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D5374B40 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8972 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 15:08:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8853 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 15:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8703 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 15:08:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AD342B1B4 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <771981300.33507.1308841667466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1647765621.32935.1308825887530.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7420) HDFS package reference throws error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-7420. --------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Hadoop requires Java 1.6.0 - this is known and expected. > HDFS package reference throws error > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7420 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Build > Reporter: Pushparaj > > I have referenced this package in my Java code. The project needs to be compiled using JDK 1.5 compiler only. > The Hadoop reference throws error from javac as below. > [javac] class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 49.0 > Note: If compiled using Java 1.6 , it goes through. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16656-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 16:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11CC346FC for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24481 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 16:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24328 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 16:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24320 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 16:56:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:56:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A9A42B3AE for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1449616331.33814.1308848149691.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053962#comment-13053962 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- @Taro, regarding 'loading native libs twice', if using the same classloader, loading a nativelib a second time is a NOP, the JVM complains only if the classloader is different from the first load. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16657-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 17:06:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 755A1425C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49944 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49895 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49879 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 17:06:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1348242B962 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:05:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2055750991.33895.1308848750075.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053971#comment-13053971 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ I'd like to see: a) OS X (32-bit and 64-bit) support b) This tested on something other than a Sun JVM, preferably IBM's since a few folks are using that. Also, how hard is it to add a non-bundled so? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16658-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 17:38:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DE9A4769 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6514 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6458 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6293 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16CB42B8C2 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1634947298.33988.1308850667984.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314-v2.patch, HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16659-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 17:38:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 443934786 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6970 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6938 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6930 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 17:38:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F2442B8C0 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <598046568.33986.1308850667902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7314-v2.patch Updated patch for trunk > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314-v2.patch, HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16660-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 17:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF6F417A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38576 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38540 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 17:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38531 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 17:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:56:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC8D42B194 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <794665588.34087.1308851747372.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054005#comment-13054005 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7314: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483621/HADOOP-7314-v2.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/667//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/667//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/667//console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314-v2.patch, HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16661-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 19:08:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCAA247D7 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96335 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 19:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96303 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 19:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96281 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 19:08:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:08:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:08:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631B042B1BD for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <298429641.34286.1308856067402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6508) Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054040#comment-13054040 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6508: ------------------------------------------ Should this really be resolved/fixed or is this JIRA in some other state? > Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6508 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: CompositeContext-solution.png, CompositeContext.png > > > In our clusters, when we use CompositeContext with two contexts, second context gets wrong values. > This problem is consistent on 500 (and above) node cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16662-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 20:27:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A07624E09 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16109 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16054 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15856 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 20:27:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:27:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C6442B58B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ron Bodkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <538925304.34436.1308860807491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7421) Performance Patch: Disable Client-Side Nagle By Default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Performance Patch: Disable Client-Side Nagle By Default ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7421 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7421 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Ron Bodkin HADOOP-2232 was a valuable contribution, but I would suggest that Hadoop IPC should disable Nagle's algorithm by default, to improve performance system-wide. Nagle just adds delay to network connections, which is unnecessary in the high bandwidth networks that Hadoop uses. As it stands, this becomes an obscure, little known but important performance optimization (especially for HBase), which took us days to track down during a performance tuning exercise. Obviously integrating this optimization into the Hadoop release will require performance testing to validate that it doesn't harm performance, but it should only help. I will submit a patch for how to address this in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16663-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 20:43:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA14C47B3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47164 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 20:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47117 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 20:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47109 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 20:43:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:43:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:43:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF1842BD96 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1370156955.34475.1308861767836.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054087#comment-13054087 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------ Is the intent to provide bindings to pre-existing software or is the intent to re-invent the wheel? > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16664-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 22:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D1C34B88 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43752 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43697 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43678 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 22:35:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1963742C518 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <767799780.34844.1308868488100.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6682) NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054146#comment-13054146 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6682: ------------------------------------- The Y20 patch here is bogus btw it changes from 10 to 16 instead of vice versa. Doesn't look like it was applied anywhere so not a big deal. > NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6682-Y20.patch, HADOOP-6682.patch > > > public static String normalizeHostName(String name) { > if (Character.digit(name.charAt(0), 16) != -1) { > return name; > This code is attempting to short-circuit the hostname->ip resolution on the assumption that if name starts with a digit, it's already an ip address. This is of questionable value, but because it checks for a hex digit, it will fail on names starting with [a-f]. Such names will not be converted to an ip address, but be returned unchanged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16665-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 22:39:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0B234DD9 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50459 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:39:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50437 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:39:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50429 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 22:39:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:39:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:39:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFD442C67B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <522664711.34856.1308868727578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6682) NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054148#comment-13054148 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6682: ------------------------------------- hmmm... must have run the patch the wrong way. That was one crazy week. > NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6682-Y20.patch, HADOOP-6682.patch > > > public static String normalizeHostName(String name) { > if (Character.digit(name.charAt(0), 16) != -1) { > return name; > This code is attempting to short-circuit the hostname->ip resolution on the assumption that if name starts with a digit, it's already an ip address. This is of questionable value, but because it checks for a hex digit, it will fail on names starting with [a-f]. Such names will not be converted to an ip address, but be returned unchanged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16666-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A23EA42AA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87068 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86979 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86718 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59DF42C200 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <452979018.34930.1308870767740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7422) Test that the topology script is always passed IP addresses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Test that the topology script is always passed IP addresses ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7422 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7422 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: test Reporter: Eli Collins Now that HADOOP-6682 has been fixed, Hadoop should always pass the topology script an IP address rather than a hostname. We should write a test that covers this (specifically that DNSToSwitchMapping#resolve is always passed IP addresses) so users can safely write topology scripts that don't handle hostnames. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16667-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:15:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3D2543A8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90093 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89997 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89988 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CCF42C2CE for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1950919684.34935.1308870887426.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054167#comment-13054167 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7385: -------------------------------------- +1 on the patch. > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16668-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:15:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0F7443D4 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90347 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90317 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90309 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:15:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:15:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F8542C2D0 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <168201296.34937.1308870887480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7385: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16669-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:17:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2D4B4A9D for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94879 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:17:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94842 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94829 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:17:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:17:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAF642C3F3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <814884523.34939.1308871007433.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7423) Document topology script requirements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Document topology script requirements ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7423 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: Eli Collins The topology script documentation is cluster_setup.xml is unclear. The topology script: # Only needs to handle IP addresses (not hostnames) # Needs to handle multiple arguments for caching to work effectively We should check in an example script or include an example one in the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16670-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:23:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D62164B02 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1999 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1644 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1382 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5E42C62A for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1133748281.34969.1308871367581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7424) Log an error if the topology script doesn't handle multiple args MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Log an error if the topology script doesn't handle multiple args ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7424 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7424 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Eli Collins ScriptBasedMapping#resolve currently warns and returns null if it passes n arguments to the topology script and gets back a different number of resolutions. This indicates a bug in the topology script (or it's input) and therefore should be an error. {code} // invalid number of entries returned by the script LOG.warn("Script " + scriptName + " returned " + Integer.toString(m.size()) + " values when " + Integer.toString(names.size()) + " were expected."); return null; {code} There's only one place in Hadoop (FSNamesystem init) where we pass multiple arguments to the topology script, and it only done for performance (to trigger resolution/caching of all the hosts in the includes file on startup). So currently a topology script that doesn't handle multiple arguments just means the initial cache population doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16671-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:23:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231FA4B10 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3161 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3120 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3084 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:23:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1AF42C625 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1546283423.34964.1308871367431.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <814884523.34939.1308871007433.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7423) Document topology script requirements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7423: ----------------------------------- Tags: (was: newbie) Labels: newbie (was: ) > Document topology script requirements > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7423 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Labels: newbie > > The topology script documentation is cluster_setup.xml is unclear. The topology script: > # Only needs to handle IP addresses (not hostnames) > # Needs to handle multiple arguments for caching to work effectively > We should check in an example script or include an example one in the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16672-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:25:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE8CD4B6E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7522 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7484 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7475 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666AD42C735 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <735184810.34971.1308871487416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1133748281.34969.1308871367581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7424) Log an error if the topology script doesn't handle multiple args MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7424: -------------------------------- Tags: (was: newbie) Labels: newbie (was: ) > Log an error if the topology script doesn't handle multiple args > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7424 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Eli Collins > Labels: newbie > > ScriptBasedMapping#resolve currently warns and returns null if it passes n arguments to the topology script and gets back a different number of resolutions. This indicates a bug in the topology script (or it's input) and therefore should be an error. > {code} > // invalid number of entries returned by the script > LOG.warn("Script " + scriptName + " returned " > + Integer.toString(m.size()) + " values when " > + Integer.toString(names.size()) + " were expected."); > return null; > {code} > There's only one place in Hadoop (FSNamesystem init) where we pass multiple arguments to the topology script, and it only done for performance (to trigger resolution/caching of all the hosts in the includes file on startup). So currently a topology script that doesn't handle multiple arguments just means the initial cache population doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16673-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:25:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1147E4B7C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7730 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7674 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7554 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:25:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1542C73B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1738749828.34975.1308871487544.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <452979018.34930.1308870767740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7422) Test that the topology script is always passed IP addresses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7422: -------------------------------- Tags: (was: newbie) Labels: newbie (was: ) > Test that the topology script is always passed IP addresses > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7422 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7422 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Labels: newbie > > Now that HADOOP-6682 has been fixed, Hadoop should always pass the topology script an IP address rather than a hostname. We should write a test that covers this (specifically that DNSToSwitchMapping#resolve is always passed IP addresses) so users can safely write topology scripts that don't handle hostnames. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16674-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:35:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42E7B45DB for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25980 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25972 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:35:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AF442CADC for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2007686244.35009.1308872088282.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054177#comment-13054177 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7385: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482614/HADOOP-7385-1.patch against trunk revision 1137724. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/668//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/668//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/668//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16675-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:57:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FE684F45 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51729 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:57:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51703 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51695 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:57:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:57:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:57:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B19242C02B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <996387520.35050.1308873407435.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7385: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16676-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 23 23:59:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7DB84F7E for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55137 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:59:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55115 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 23:59:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55107 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 23:59:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:59:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:59:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9970442C100 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <285596089.35055.1308873527625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054185#comment-13054185 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7385: -------------------------------------- Just committed the patch. Thanks to Bharath Mundlapudi! > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16677-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 00:03:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5F7E4078 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61152 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 00:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61123 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 00:03:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61115 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 00:03:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:03:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:03:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6997B42C22E for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <591641687.35065.1308873767429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7385: --------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16678-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 02:06:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FE096C64 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68630 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68417 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68267 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 02:06:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:06:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:06:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB54542C545 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "steven zhuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1304349125.35232.1308881147698.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7425) ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure the KeyFieldBasedPartitioner twice in Hadoop 0.21.0, when KeyFieldBasedPartitioner is an Configurable instance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure the KeyFieldBasedPartitioner twice in Hadoop 0.21.0, when KeyFieldBasedPartitioner is an Configurable instance ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7425 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7425 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: util Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: steven zhuang In the setConf method of org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils, any instance of Configurable would be configured twice. In 0.21.0, KeyFieldBasedPartitioner implements the Configurable interface. When configured twice, it get two KeyDescription and gives out wrong partition number. public static void setConf(Object theObject, Configuration conf) { if (conf != null) { if (theObject instanceof Configurable) { ((Configurable) theObject).setConf(conf); } setJobConf(theObject, conf); } } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16679-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 02:20:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B439C6356 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79740 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:20:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79685 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79677 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 02:20:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:20:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C1042C92A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Taro L. Saito (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <618064660.35245.1308881987540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054215#comment-13054215 ] Taro L. Saito commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- @Issei @Alejandro Great. That means as long as using the same classloader (as Hadoop seems to do so), reusing libsnappy.so between hadoop-snappy and snappy-java is no problem. Now, it looks like whether to use libsnappy.so or not is a problem of snappy-java, and I prefer to use libsnappyjava.so (statically linked snappy + JNI code with -fvisibility=hiden option), which can avoid potential API conflict and missing library problems (for some OSes). In my experience of developing sqlite-jdbc (http://sqlite-jdbc.googlecode.com/), which uses the same technique to extract .so file at runtime, many people seems to be satisfied with this approach. The problem that can be solved by the runtime library extraction is failures due to misconfiguration (e.g., LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.) and library build process (gcc, linker options, etc.) for each OS. For example, I frequently use Windows to develop the code, but run the production code under Linux; no need to switch the library files really helps me a lot. But, looking at HADOOP-7405, current Hadoop's native libraries are not so portable across various OSes. In such a state, motivation for using portable library something like snappy-java might be low. I don't care which one is used in Hadoop, but the discussion in this thread has been useful for me to improve snappy-java. Thanks! @Allen a) OS X (32-bit/64-bit) are already supported. b) I need to know os.name and os.arch name system properties that IBM JVM provides. Building and embedding non-bundled so file into snappy-java is simple; just do "make". As a matter of fact, I do it for 6 types of OS and CPU combinations. And also, by using VMWare FUSION in Mac, all of native libraries currently supported can be compiled in a single machine. Some 64-bit OS can be used to build 32-bit native libraries (e.g., Windows, Linux, etc.) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16680-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 02:36:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5CC569C6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89037 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88956 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 02:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88946 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 02:36:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:36:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606F742CCA5 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <248050298.35309.1308882947391.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054218#comment-13054218 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- HMS is design to deploy existing Hadoop software stack. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16681-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 03:36:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAAFD67D6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24304 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 03:36:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24070 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 03:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24025 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 03:36:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:36:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:36:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887442C98C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2056306331.35399.1308886547556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch Attached is a patch based on Issay's patch. * It reverts the current committed HADOOP-7206 & HADDOP-7407 * It uses Snappy native directly * It adds the JNI bindings to Hadoop native * Via {{configure.ac}}, if snappy is not available it ignores Snappy JNI bindings * Snappy lib is looked (by default) at {{/usr/local}} * Once Snappy is avail by default in different OSes, the default lookup can be changed to {{/usr/}} for automatic detection * Location of Snappy lib can be altered with {{-Dsnappy.prefix=}} Ant option * SnappyCodec is defined in {{core-default.xml}} * If the Snappy JNI bindings and/or Snappy are not present, SnappyCodec warns and continues IMO this addresses the concerns previously discussed in the JIRA. And it will not break the build in Apache Jenkins machines if Snappy is not install. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16682-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 05:13:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 812766373 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72453 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:13:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72221 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72202 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 05:13:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:13:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:13:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699AD42C1C0 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1467102947.35701.1308892367429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <814884523.34939.1308871007433.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7423) Document topology script requirements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054241#comment-13054241 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7423: ------------------------------------------ Isn't it true that even with IP addresses used in the topology script, one still has to make sure that Hostname=>IP=>Hostname is always consistent? We had a situation where some nodes were inserted in each rack all and the numeric part of the names of the data nodes shifted by a few numbers (the domain also changed slighty). Even though the IP addresses stayed the same, for some of the nodes an nslookup resulted in multiple entries. We got some weird behavior. In a brief glance through the code there seem to be several places where IP is mapped to name and name is mapped to IP, or am I wrong in this? > Document topology script requirements > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7423 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Labels: newbie > > The topology script documentation is cluster_setup.xml is unclear. The topology script: > # Only needs to handle IP addresses (not hostnames) > # Needs to handle multiple arguments for caching to work effectively > We should check in an example script or include an example one in the docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16683-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 05:23:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 879DB6A06 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78447 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:23:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78059 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 05:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77974 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 05:23:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E2742C587 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bryant Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <690225560.35713.1308892967888.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5911) Adding Eclipse "launch" tasks for Hadoop daemons MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054242#comment-13054242 ] Bryant Yao commented on HADOOP-5911: ------------------------------------ Hi, I am a USC student in Chris Mattmann's class. I wanted to create an Hadoop-specific launch configuration for my class project which will help fix this issue. I was wondering if there was any help you could give me in figuring out the requirements for this issue. Thanks! > Adding Eclipse "launch" tasks for Hadoop daemons > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5911 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5911 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Environment: Eclipse 3.4 > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Attachments: HADOOP-5911.patch > > > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > Next comment will include a patch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16684-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 06:13:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DA06F66 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17690 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 06:13:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16889 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 06:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16874 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 06:13:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:13:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:13:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9D342C4EA for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1897048622.35775.1308895967437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <639440876.5515.1308103967395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7394) Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HADOOP-7394. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Duplicate Looks like this is a duplicate of HADOOP-7303. > Chinese documentation can't be built with Forrest 0.9 > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7394 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7394 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Minor > > Running {{ant cn-docs}} with Forrest 0.8 will work. Running the same thing with Forrest 0.9 prints the following error: > {noformat} > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/messaging/MessageHandler > at org.apache.cocoon.serialization.FOPSerializer.configure(FOPSerializer.java:122) > at org.apache.avalon.framework.container.ContainerUtil.configure(ContainerUtil.java:201) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.DefaultComponentFactory.newInstance(DefaultComponentFactory.java:289) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.newPoolable(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:655) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.pool.InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.get(InstrumentedResourceLimitingPool.java:371) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.PoolableComponentHandler.doGet(PoolableComponentHandler.java:198) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ComponentHandler.get(ComponentHandler.java:381) > at org.apache.avalon.excalibur.component.ExcaliburComponentSelector.select(ExcaliburComponentSelector.java:215) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.ExtendedComponentSelector.select(ExtendedComponentSelector.java:268) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.AbstractProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractProcessingPipeline.java:311) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.setSerializer(AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java:171) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SerializeNode.invoke(SerializeNode.java:120) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:103) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:47) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PreparableMatchNode.invoke(PreparableMatchNode.java:131) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.MountNode.invoke(MountNode.java:118) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.SelectNode.invoke(SelectNode.java:98) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelineNode.invoke(PipelineNode.java:143) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.AbstractParentProcessingNode.invokeNodes(AbstractParentProcessingNode.java:69) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PipelinesNode.invoke(PipelinesNode.java:93) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:235) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.ConcreteTreeProcessor.process(ConcreteTreeProcessor.java:177) > at org.apache.cocoon.components.treeprocessor.TreeProcessor.process(TreeProcessor.java:254) > at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.process(Cocoon.java:699) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonWrapper.getPage(CocoonWrapper.java:514) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.processTarget(CocoonBean.java:499) > at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.process(CocoonBean.java:356) > at org.apache.cocoon.Main.main(Main.java:321) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.fop.messaging.MessageHandler > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) > ... 38 more > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16685-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 12:52:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 263356571 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17555 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 12:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16599 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 12:52:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16419 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 12:52:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:52:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:52:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC15A42D9CD for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:51:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1310013439.36547.1308919909832.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054418#comment-13054418 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- TestCodec passes for me both when snappy is not installed and when snappy is installed and native compilation is enabled. +1 > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16686-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:06:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 099246091 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38210 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38136 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38127 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58C242DF04 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1486205511.37237.1308935147871.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch The updated patch allows the Ant build to include the snappy SO next to the hadoop SO. By default this option is disabled, to enabled invoke Ant with the '-Dbundle.snappy=true' option. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16687-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:06:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5263E60AE for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38642 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38600 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38592 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:06:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51C42DF4A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:05:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1949635982.37290.1308935149838.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16688-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:20:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C54E6A79 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65559 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65450 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:20:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65430 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:20:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:20:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:20:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB6B42E597 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:19:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <762231158.37424.1308935989573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054561#comment-13054561 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Hey Alejandro - mind if I revert the previous two patches and then we can apply the new one? Would be nice to have this go in a single commit. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16689-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:24:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7323F6CEE for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72665 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:24:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72589 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:24:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72581 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:24:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:24:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:24:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BB742E712 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <399025460.37464.1308936227880.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054566#comment-13054566 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483739/HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch against trunk revision 1139123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/669//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/669//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/669//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/669//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16690-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:40:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D342964FE for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90978 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90940 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90932 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5FE42EED7 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <442235887.37611.1308937189514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054572#comment-13054572 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Eli, I'm good. I'll prepare that patch and I'll add the missing AL > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16691-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:40:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07DEB650C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91174 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91111 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90985 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:40:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9972642EEDA for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:39:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1895887268.37614.1308937189625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16692-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:44:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92A5D65AB for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95908 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:44:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95729 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95700 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:44:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:44:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:44:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A78042D11D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <906341420.37719.1308937429563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054574#comment-13054574 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Great. I've reverted 7206 and 7407, you can attach a new patch now. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16693-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:54:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28D426E72 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7108 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7071 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7049 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9833942D5D0 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <776968642.37737.1308938027619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reopened HADOOP-7407: -------------------------------------------- > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16694-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:54:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8263A6E7C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7378 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7341 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7332 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:54:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0E942D5E4 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <467656216.37745.1308938027906.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-7407. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem It turns out that we have to revert HADOOP-7206 and this (Thanks Eli). So this is not a problem anymore. > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16695-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 17:58:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1204460E6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18518 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18485 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 17:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18477 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 17:58:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9487842D89B for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <192369022.37780.1308938270605.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16696-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:08:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3ECFB68D1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32826 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32803 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32793 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D321942DED1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:07:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2018335596.37913.1308938869861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206new.patch It works on top of the reverted trunk. Added missing AL Replaced System.err.println() with log messages > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16697-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:08:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D5236913 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34466 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34443 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34403 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:08:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:08:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CBA42DF0F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:07:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <62715422.37966.1308938871888.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16698-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:14:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 680646A9D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47860 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47823 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:14:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47722 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:14:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:14:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E2D42E2BD for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <863327185.38019.1308939228016.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054598#comment-13054598 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Alejandro, could you add javadoc for the new public method/fields and @Override for the overriding methods? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16699-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:24:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E385962F4 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65895 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65856 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65845 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:24:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:24:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7329B42E8B8 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:23:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <854269091.38161.1308939829468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054609#comment-13054609 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483753/HADOOP-7206new.patch against trunk revision 1139387. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/670//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/670//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/670//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16700-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:42:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFBC96EE2 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96289 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96252 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96238 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA4742E009 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1070636631.38224.1308940907454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7408: ------------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16701-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:42:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AD016F17 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97859 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97801 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97764 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:42:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:42:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EBA42E00D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <107862294.38228.1308940907562.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1760011225.22288.1308599807546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7408) Add javadoc for SnappyCodec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE resolved HADOOP-7408. -------------------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) It turns out that we have to revert HADOOP-7206. So this is not a problem anymore. > Add javadoc for SnappyCodec > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7408 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > Assignee: T Jake Luciani > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7408.patch, v1-HADOOP-7408-add-snappy-javadoc.txt > > > HADOOP-7206 failed to include a javadoc for public methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16702-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 18:54:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB46966EC for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12809 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12775 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 18:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12767 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 18:54:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:54:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:54:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BEB42E424 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991846466.38245.1308941627425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054625#comment-13054625 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7414: --------------------------------- bq. What is trying to be achieved here? The problem is not about war. It's about picking up the compiled jsp classes from the webapps directory inside a jar. Without this patch the directory must be a fs directory and not a resource inside a jar, which Ben wants. This is useful to create a single jar installation of hadoop for easy deployment (in Ben's case, show-off :)) As for the patch, I think it'll be prudent to check if the name endsWith("/"), as there might exist code trying to compensate the same problem and that testing whether "//" works with jetty's different versions seems a lot more work. > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16703-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 21:16:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2066E6DFC for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25334 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24788 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24772 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 21:16:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:16:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:16:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDE942E10C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <373123281.38525.1308950147582.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1354187382.13188.1307764078831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7380) Common portion of HDFS-1973 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7380: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7380.2.patch Here's an updated patch which I believe is ready for commit. I mostly just rebased against trunk and added comments since the last one. Eli, please let me know what you think. > Common portion of HDFS-1973 > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7380 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7380 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7380.0.patch, hadoop-7380.1.patch, hadoop-7380.2.patch > > > Implementing client failover will likely require changes to {{o.a.h.io.ipc}} and/or {{o.a.h.io.retry}}. This JIRA is to track those changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16704-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 21:18:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1539768F0 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31068 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30929 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:18:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30921 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 21:18:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:18:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:18:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E0342E1BB for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <825967375.38532.1308950268528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-5911) Adding Eclipse "launch" tasks for Hadoop daemons MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-5911: -------------------------------- Assignee: (was: Philip Zeyliger) Labels: newbie (was: ) Hey Bryant, Welcome! Phil is not working on this, I'd check out his patch and see if you can get it working on trunk. Thanks, Eli > Adding Eclipse "launch" tasks for Hadoop daemons > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5911 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5911 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Environment: Eclipse 3.4 > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-5911.patch > > > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > Next comment will include a patch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16705-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 21:24:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEEFD67AD for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41665 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41570 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 21:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41546 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 21:24:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:24:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:24:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C660642E3D8 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1502310367.38551.1308950627809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054683#comment-13054683 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------- Hey Eric, HMS is a separate project headed to the incubator (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HMSProposal) right? > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16706-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:09:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 972076A0F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38783 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38570 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38465 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:09:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:09:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:09:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CB142EAED for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1815196256.38852.1308956927942.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054736#comment-13054736 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Looks great! Thanks for coming up with an implementation that incorporates all the discussion. Testing? Modulo Nicholas' good feedback, minor review feedback follows * Why is property environment="env" needed? Can we remove that same setting from the findbugs target now that it's global? * Indicate is -> Indicate if * java.library.path should use ${snappy.lib} vs ${snappy.prefix}/lib * #if shoudldn't be indented in org_apache_hadoop_io_compress_snappy.h, and Snappy*.c, ie everything can be shifted left one stop. * 1st echo in packageNativeHadoop.sh is missindented * "io.compression.codec.snappy.buffersize" should be defined in CommonConfigurationKeys * In LoadSnappy I don't think we need to log if hadoopNativeAvailable because that will is indicated by the output of NativeCodeLoader already > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16707-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:25:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE686171 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51214 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:25:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51155 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51147 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:25:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:25:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:25:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC3142E1F1 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1117745742.38954.1308957887380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7372: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7372-2.patch Patch attached, reverts 1055647 and moves the one addition in CHANGES.txt from the 20.4 section to the 20.3 section. > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch, hadoop-7372-2.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16708-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:29:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDE626233 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53975 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53917 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53902 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D397342E326 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1839076211.38970.1308958127863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054751#comment-13054751 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7372: ------------------------------------- +1 seems reasonable to me. > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch, hadoop-7372-2.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16709-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:29:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7420B624A for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54280 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54201 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54192 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:29:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD21D42E325 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1455318042.38969.1308958127837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054750#comment-13054750 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- Hi Eli, I am uncertain where is the best place for this project. This is a customized manage and deployment system for Hadoop software stack. Hence, it could be inside Hadoop or in the incubator. Some people have expressed interests for this to be in the contrib project, and others think this should be an incubator project. I am fine either way, but I did drafted the incubator proposal. What do people think? Let me post a architecture diagram and design. Hadoop community can decide the proper course of action. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16710-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:33:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BB29619D for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55814 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:33:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55769 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55761 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:33:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:33:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3B342E40C for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2057849156.38976.1308958367509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054752#comment-13054752 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7418: ---------------------------------------- Hey Andrew, patch looks pretty good to me. One question: >From manually inspecting the code, I suspect the {{Path}} class will still not correctly handle the case of multiple trailing slashes. Would you mind adding a test case to test some path with a silly number (> 5) of trailing slashes? You might also consider running the full HDFS and MR test suites with this patch installed, as those obviously exercise all of the {{Path}} code quite a bit. See the "Changes that span projects" section of this page for instructions about how to get HDFS and MR to compile against your patched Common: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16711-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E746683F for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57060 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57017 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57009 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B2242E514 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <265705155.38982.1308958487532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7372: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Thanks Todd. I've committed this and updated the two jiras w 0.20.4 fix version to 0.20.3. > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch, hadoop-7372-2.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16712-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:35:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F9A66854 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57139 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57036 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57018 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:35:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:35:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A4B42E517 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <830941199.38984.1308958487626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1479142716.7833.1307643118867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7372) Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7372: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Remove ref of 20.3 release from branch-0.20 CHANGES.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: hadoop-7372-1.patch, hadoop-7372-2.patch > > > CHANGES.txt on branch-0.20 claims there was a 0.20.3 release on 1/5. There has not been a 0.20.3 release. > {noformat} > Release 0.20.4 - Unreleased > ... > Release 0.20.3 - 2011-1-5 > {noformat} > We should update this to indicate 0.20. is unreleased. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16713-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Jun 24 23:51:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6FCF6F31 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66282 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66250 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 23:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66242 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 23:51:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:51:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:51:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8111742E9AB for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <549943764.39015.1308959447525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206new-b.patch Incorporating Nicholas's & Eli's comments. Thxs. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16714-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:03:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AD166F0E for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71299 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70961 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70951 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:03:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:03:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B2542ED38 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1075703539.39087.1308960167851.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054765#comment-13054765 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------------------- Regarding testing, i've tested it in Ubuntu, with and without snappy SO present. The makes the ENV variables available as properties with prefix "env.". > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16715-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:05:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0CDC6688 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72203 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72149 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72141 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D226442EE93 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1407052132.39191.1308960289857.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054766#comment-13054766 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- +1 I'll wait for Hudson to finish before committing. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16716-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:05:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 132EB669A for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72483 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72435 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72427 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:05:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:05:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A2E42EED1 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:04:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1810130575.39244.1308960291945.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054767#comment-13054767 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483793/HADOOP-7206new-b.patch against trunk revision 1139387. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/671//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/671//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/671//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16717-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:07:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88CF36736 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75939 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:07:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75662 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75628 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:07:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:07:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67542C003 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:06:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1727637131.39299.1308960410121.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) var mistake in build script > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16718-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:09:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA6036752 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77463 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:09:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77397 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77382 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:09:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:09:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:09:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE4442C138 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1390107011.39312.1308960527696.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7426) User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7426 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7426 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16719-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:11:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFFC5685B for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80741 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80375 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80362 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B0842C3C1 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <378306222.39319.1308960647876.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206new-c.patch > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16720-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:11:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 708216868 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81113 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81038 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81027 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43E42C3BC for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <436437289.39315.1308960647714.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1390107011.39312.1308960527696.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7426) User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7426: --------------------------------- Attachment: Viewfs Guide.pdf > User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7426 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7426 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Viewfs Guide.pdf > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16721-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:11:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14DBC687D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81457 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81412 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81404 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC22C42C406 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <966174505.39371.1308960649833.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1390107011.39312.1308960527696.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7426) User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054774#comment-13054774 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7426: -------------------------------------- I have attached a guide for using viewfs with federation. > User Guide for how to use viewfs with federation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7426 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7426 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Priority: Minor > Attachments: Viewfs Guide.pdf > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16722-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:11:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6454468AD for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82955 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82900 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82892 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:11:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C466F42C44E for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:10:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1464091340.39424.1308960651801.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16723-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:15:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 957206995 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88327 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88279 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88271 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:15:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:15:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937B642C654 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1230234416.39481.1308960889600.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054775#comment-13054775 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Ah, thought those snappy.* properties were globally scoped, +1 to fix in the latest patch. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16724-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:25:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E00616FD8 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97058 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:25:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96979 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:25:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96969 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:25:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:25:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:25:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A1842C888 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:24:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1933976710.39494.1308961488269.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054777#comment-13054777 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483796/HADOOP-7206new-c.patch against trunk revision 1139387. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/672//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/672//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/672//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16725-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 00:59:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB9C60E3 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19350 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:59:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19231 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 00:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19220 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 00:59:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:59:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:59:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7685342E08B for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <558149280.39602.1308963527482.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054785#comment-13054785 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- I verified that with snappy-1.0.3 installed on my host a tarball built with {{ant -Dforrest.home=$FORREST_HOME -Dbundle.snappy=true compile-native tar}} correctly bundles the snappy lib. Also tested that TestCodec run from this tarball runs w/ native snappy enabled when it (and libhadoop) are available on the host. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16726-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 01:01:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A20C67AC for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20446 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:01:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20399 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20391 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 01:01:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:01:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:01:17 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DEE42E1BD for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:00:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <777942870.39683.1308963656204.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054786#comment-13054786 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------------ @Alejandro, thanks for adding the javadoc. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16727-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 01:03:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0DD56124 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22422 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:03:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22364 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22356 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 01:03:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:03:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:03:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6E542E33A for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1275634327.39748.1308963767830.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054787#comment-13054787 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- A brief description of Hadoop Management System design: !http://people.apache.org/~eyang/docs/HMS.svg! h4. Setup HMS Agent is a list of rpm packages which can be deployed as part of OS image through PXE boot. HMS Beacon is a daemon which runs on each zookeeper nodes to broadcast the location of the zookeeper. HMS Agent and controllers are standalone daemons, which resolve zookeeper location through HMS Beacon (zeroconf). h4. Operation Operator can issue command through HMS client and pass through HMS controller REST API. HMS command is serialized into JSON messages and queued in Zookeeper. Multiple HMS controllers watch the command queue for commands. When a command triggers the controller to execute, HMS controllers compete to create a lock for the command, and corresponding cluster to execute the command. If locks are successfully created, the controller begin to translate the command into a list of actions to perform on the managed nodes. HMS controller watches for the status queues and coordinate actions to perform on HMS agents. HMS managed agents download software through yum repository or bit torrent through peer exchange. HMS agent reports installation status and configuration status back to agent status queue for HMS controller to orchestrate the cluster deployment. Once, all actions are finalized, HMS controller store the deployment command history in the cluster node. In the event of node failures (to be implemented), operator can re-image the defected node. When the agent join back, HMS agent can send status to controller to replay the installation and configuration history to recover. h4. Monitoring Proposal For large clusters deployment, monitoring setup could be complex. HMS can simplify this by orchestrate Hadoop 0.20.2+1 (append branch) + HBase 0.90.3 + Pig 0.8.1 + Chukwa 0.5 deployment using the proposed RPM packages for HADOOP-6255, ZOOKEEPER-999, HBASE-3606, PIG-1857, CHUKWA (HADOOP-5030). > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16728-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 01:05:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC60167D7 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23744 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23714 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23705 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 01:05:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:05:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E9442E3BA for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2081065247.39756.1308963887729.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thank you Issei and Alejandro! > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16729-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 01:35:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB1C9673D for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38159 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38120 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 01:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38110 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 01:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C4D42EC0F for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <384305569.39859.1308965687425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Make hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Summary: Make hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started (was: Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started) > Make hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16730-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 09:19:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B29954FE9 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43048 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:19:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42824 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:19:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42793 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 09:19:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:19:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:19:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A9242FE95 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1247957115.40166.1308993527618.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7298: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7298.txt Ditto code patch attached, with following changes: +JavaDocs -Whitespaces > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt, hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16731-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 09:25:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9964C4459 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50102 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:25:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49664 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:25:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49616 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 09:25:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:25:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:25:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD442F02B for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <897302862.40183.1308993887623.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7298: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt, hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16732-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 09:45:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF2EB4E3A for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66259 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:45:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66026 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 09:45:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66004 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 09:45:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:45:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7144142F380 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1124953987.40193.1308995087460.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054848#comment-13054848 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7298: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483809/hadoop-7298.txt against trunk revision 1139476. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/673//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/673//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/673//console This message is automatically generated. > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt, hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16733-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 11:31:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A7D44E65 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38779 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 11:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38593 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 11:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38585 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 11:31:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:31:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6741642F735 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2037008512.40285.1309001447419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054864#comment-13054864 ] Harsh J commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------- Is using nulls agreed upon? I'd like to scrap the r3 patch if so, and get the r2 one in instead, so I can do the improvement on the MR side appropriately. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16734-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 12:23:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9454CE8 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70081 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 12:23:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70033 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 12:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70023 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 12:23:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:23:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:23:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47E42F295 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1352510570.40343.1309004567846.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6801) io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-6801: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6801.r1.diff Patch that introduces two new options over io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor, specifically for SequenceFile.Sorter: {code} seq.io.sort.mb = 100 seq.io.sort.factor = 100 {code} Descriptions included inside {{core-default.xml}} changes as well. I did not yet write checks for _deprecated_ io.sort.* properties. Is the double deprecation fine here (MR already deprecates this, and now Common has to too, for new SequenceFile.Sorter specific properties)? I believe DistCp would need documentation work as well, since it uses SequenceFile.Sorter > io.sort.mb and io.sort.factor were renamed and moved to mapreduce but are still in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java and used in SequenceFile.java > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6801 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6801 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Erik Steffl > Assignee: Harsh J > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6801.r1.diff > > > Following configuration keys in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java (former CommonConfigurationKeys.java): > public static final String IO_SORT_MB_KEY = "io.sort.mb"; > public static final String IO_SORT_FACTOR_KEY = "io.sort.factor"; > are partially moved: > - they were renamed to mapreduce.task.io.sort.mb and mapreduce.task.io.sort.factor respectively > - they were moved to mapreduce project, documented in mapred-default.xml > However: > - they are still listed in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java as quoted above > - strings "io.sort.mb" and "io.sort.factor" are used in SequenceFile.java in Hadoop Common project > Not sure what the solution is, these constants should probably be removed from CommonConfigurationKeysPublic.java but I am not sure what's the best solution for SequenceFile.java. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16735-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 15:28:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0449F4BE1 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62478 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 15:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62391 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 15:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62373 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 15:28:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:28:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:28:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11C6430AA6 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <740829586.40554.1309015667919.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054921#comment-13054921 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------ bq. This is a customized manage and deployment system for Hadoop software stack. This makes no sense. Rather than re-invent a specific type of wheel, one could generalize the wheel and get a potentially larger audience. The problem of course is that the competition rate goes way up. >From the above description, I don't see anything here that makes this particularly unique vs. other config systems. (In fact, it could be argued that it is several years behind other systems.) > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16736-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 19:06:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DCF546C4 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67729 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67638 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67630 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 19:06:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:06:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:06:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F70430F86 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jim Plush (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <414366626.40710.1309028747664.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620925511.8411.1297360858022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7135) Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054950#comment-13054950 ] Jim Plush commented on HADOOP-7135: ----------------------------------- the link above is a 404, any chance of updating it? > Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Gerard > Original Estimate: 5m > Remaining Estimate: 5m > > Looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java?r1=949659&r2=949660& > it seems this commit broke FileUtil.copyMerge by omitting NOT operator. copyMerge only makes sense if srcDir is a directory. > Should be > if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16737-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 19:14:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE1634798 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71472 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:14:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71409 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71401 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 19:14:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:14:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:14:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788F64301F9 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jim Plush (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1668666733.40729.1309029227490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620925511.8411.1297360858022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7135) Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054955#comment-13054955 ] Jim Plush commented on HADOOP-7135: ----------------------------------- This appears to be fixed in trunk FileUtil.copyMerge method now shows: dstFile = checkDest(srcDir.getName(), dstFS, dstFile, false); if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) return false; OutputStream out = dstFS.create(dstFile); > Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Gerard > Original Estimate: 5m > Remaining Estimate: 5m > > Looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java?r1=949659&r2=949660& > it seems this commit broke FileUtil.copyMerge by omitting NOT operator. copyMerge only makes sense if srcDir is a directory. > Should be > if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16738-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 19:16:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F38314ADC for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74447 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74342 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 19:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74332 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 19:16:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:16:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:16:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9194302C3 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jim Plush (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1639830023.40733.1309029348060.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1031095941.46621.1302367745992.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7218) FileUtil.copyMerge implementation error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054956#comment-13054956 ] Jim Plush commented on HADOOP-7218: ----------------------------------- This seems to be a duplicate of: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135 This is also fixed in the trunk: FileUtil.copyMerge: dstFile = checkDest(srcDir.getName(), dstFS, dstFile, false); if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) return false; OutputStream out = dstFS.create(dstFile); > FileUtil.copyMerge implementation error > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7218 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: CENTOS 5.5 64bit > Reporter: XiaoboGu > > if (srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; > should be > if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16739-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Jun 25 20:32:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB8664D90 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14291 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 20:32:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14064 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2011 20:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14052 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2011 20:32:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:32:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:32:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6292430B61 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2127217979.40819.1309033907939.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 54963#comment-13054963 ]=20 Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- Allen, I did extensive studies on all existing systems including puppet, mc= ollective, chef, cfengine, controlTier, Bcfg2. Most of the configuration m= anagement system focus on generating a set of templates and config paramete= rs and push out changes one node at a time. This works fine in small numbe= r of machines, but most of the system fails beyond 1800 nodes or become dif= ficult to maintain. i.e. mcollective uses spamming tree model on puppeteer= , hence the puppet master becomes single point of failure. One puppet mast= er failure could take large chunk of the nodes offline. HMS is designed to= remove single point of failures in the deployment system, and improve perf= ormance. we found it is more reliable to store system state in Zookeeper f= or HA. Zeroconf is great for resolving service location. Exist config man= agement system requires installation and configuration before it can be dep= loyed. HMS is designed to install and operate without having to configure = the management system. Bittorrent is much faster than install software fro= m yum repository for large scale system. Granted that this system started = several years behind existing system, but it solves some scalability and re= liability issues. =20 To summarize, HMS does the following better: - Scale - Reliability - Cross node application orchestration (action dependencies) - Speed - Sophisticate monitoring system (Reuse Chukwa) - Self healing cluster (Ability to replay history to heal nodes) > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component arou= nd management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes soft= ware installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment aut= omation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16740-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 00:41:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20C514143 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12572 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12512 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12490 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8012B42E47C for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <942858061.40936.1309048847521.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7392.2.patch Attach a patch to address the review comments. > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16741-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 00:41:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 211374144 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12811 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12517 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12491 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 00:41:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:41:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9574942E47E for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1883116628.40938.1309048847609.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16742-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 00:55:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 806AD4BE9 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20338 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:55:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20189 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 00:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20165 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 00:55:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:55:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:55:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3E042E82B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1689053382.40953.1309049687841.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054995#comment-13054995 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7392: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483831/HADOOP-7392.2.patch against trunk revision 1139476. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/674//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/674//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/674//console This message is automatically generated. > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16743-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 01:05:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80E3B42CE for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23391 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 01:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23288 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 01:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23280 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 01:05:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:05:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:05:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6305142EA28 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1456112278.40986.1309050287402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13054998#comment-13054998 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm. Thanks Tanping! > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16744-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 05:20:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADB966BBE for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3850 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2518 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2478 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8DA431108 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1932268053.41109.1309065587961.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <620925511.8411.1297360858022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7135) Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HADOOP-7135. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Invalid Assignee: Jim Plush Thanks a lot for the investigation, Jim. Closing this out. > Commit 949660 broke FileUtil.copyMerge > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7135 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Gerard > Assignee: Jim Plush > Original Estimate: 5m > Remaining Estimate: 5m > > Looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java?r1=949659&r2=949660& > it seems this commit broke FileUtil.copyMerge by omitting NOT operator. copyMerge only makes sense if srcDir is a directory. > Should be > if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16745-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 05:20:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 240986BD1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4382 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3825 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2487 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 05:20:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:20:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE164310FC for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1606206532.41098.1309065587573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1031095941.46621.1302367745992.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7218) FileUtil.copyMerge implementation error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HADOOP-7218. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Jim Plush Thanks a lot for the investigation, Jim. Closing this as a dupe. > FileUtil.copyMerge implementation error > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7218 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7218 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: CENTOS 5.5 64bit > Reporter: XiaoboGu > Assignee: Jim Plush > > if (srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; > should be > if (!srcFS.getFileStatus(srcDir).isDirectory()) > return false; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16746-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 09:00:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3509367D4 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84092 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 09:00:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83473 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 09:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83402 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 09:00:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:00:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:00:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8932B431FE1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1513260035.41223.1309078787558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055036#comment-13055036 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7328: --------------------------------------- Yes, I think the r2 patch is good. You need to write some unit tests to ensure the behavior doesn't regress. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16747-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 10:35:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C00D693E for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36196 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 10:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36012 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 10:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35993 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 10:35:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:35:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:35:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648CE431E8B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <448809532.41257.1309084487408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-310: -------------------------------- Attachment: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch Great points. The attached removes the set method which would have been confusing. This is what the original JIRA request was for. I do not see any need for the set method I had previously written. If you compare the cost of creating of an additional object, due to no zero copy set, versus being required to perform a copy to fill the BW, the extra object should be negligible with a byte array of any size. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16748-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:10:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B71B6EC1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7028 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6963 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6689 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979414325CE for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <596015862.41728.1309111787617.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7328.r4.diff Revised patch of {{r2}} that adds in a new test as well (per Owen's comment). > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16749-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:10:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 674106ED0 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7286 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7259 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7249 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:10:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:10:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76824325D0 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <398836262.41730.1309111787682.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16750-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:14:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CC65622B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17193 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17138 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17121 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:14:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:14:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:14:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B428432698 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <137825466.41736.1309112027435.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055136#comment-13055136 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7328: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483864/HADOOP-7328.r4.diff against trunk revision 1139476. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/675//console This message is automatically generated. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16751-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:24:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D499868C5 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23692 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:24:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23400 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:24:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23388 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:24:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:24:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:24:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B688443289A for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1715558479.41760.1309112627744.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7328.r4.diff Not sure what went wrong with {{patch}} there. Re-attaching with {{common/}} prefixes removed. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16752-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:26:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3799768DD for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24108 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23991 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23983 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118EF4329FA for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <628124890.41777.1309112748068.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16753-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:26:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D022E68F6 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24307 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24271 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24251 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:26:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:26:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3124329F4 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <736875858.41771.1309112747841.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J updated HADOOP-7328: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16754-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 18:34:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA5886DEE for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27886 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27836 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 18:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27812 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 18:34:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:34:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:34:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA05432C16 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2136446577.41801.1309113227773.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055147#comment-13055147 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7328: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483867/HADOOP-7328.r4.diff against trunk revision 1139476. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/676//console This message is automatically generated. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J > Assignee: Harsh J > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff, HADOOP-7328.r2.diff, HADOOP-7328.r3.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff, HADOOP-7328.r4.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16755-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 21:54:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEC3D6BA9 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34827 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34760 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34750 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 21:54:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:54:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:54:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51AB432896 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:53:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <331529283.42058.1309125229804.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Thanks Luke for reviewing. Just committed to trunk. Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16756-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 21:56:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B7246BE3 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35422 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35286 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35278 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B27C43296A for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1939799470.42064.1309125347501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7392: --------------------------------- Release Note: (was: Thanks Luke for reviewing. Just committed to trunk.) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16757-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Jun 26 21:56:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26AFD6BF3 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35602 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35560 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35546 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2011 21:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:56:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8165243296B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1260447183.42065.1309125347527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164404123.4447.1308088127466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7392) Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055212#comment-13055212 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7392: -------------------------------------- Thanks Luke for reviewing. Just committed to trunk. > Implement capability of querying individual property of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7392 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7392 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7392.2.patch, HADOOP-7392.patch > > > Hadoop-7144 provides the capability to query all the properties of a mbean using JMXProxyServlet. In addition to this, we add the capability to query an individual property of a mbean. Client will send http request, > http://hostname/jmx?get=meanName::property > to query from server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16758-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 00:10:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC8206339 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33059 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32964 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32956 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 00:10:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:10:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:10:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953774327A9 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7427 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: scripts Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE {noformat} [exec] Finished build. [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' BUILD FAILED hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16759-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 00:18:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A04C96F6F for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43135 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:18:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42927 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42916 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 00:18:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:18:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:18:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7C243298F for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <645613181.42251.1309133867453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055244#comment-13055244 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------- {quote} Allen, I did extensive studies on all existing systems including puppet, mcollective, chef, cfengine, controlTier, Bcfg2. Most of the configuration management system focus on generating a set of templates and config parameters and push out changes one node at a time. This works fine in small number of machines, but most of the system fails beyond 1800 nodes or become difficult to maintain. {quote} We use tar, ssh, wget, rsync & gpg with custom roles system (https://computing.llnl.gov/linux/genders.html can be an alternative) to manage configuration and packages. Our environment is probably still small to hit the limits of these tools. Our challenge with managing hadoop cluster is the lack of standard interfaces to reliably monitor the cluster. Standard unix tools expect process to exit with non zero status on error and counters to be positive numbers. IMHO whats needed here are features like HADOOP-6728 & HADOOP-7144, make them consistent across all components and integrate them with existing tools, HADOOP-7324 . bq. Zeroconf is great for resolving service location. As part of this proposal, are there plans to update how hadoop daemon and client configurations are handled or is this specific to HMS? bq. Bittorrent is much faster than install software from yum repository for large scale system. Bittorrent is a file sharing protocol and yum is a utility for rpm package management. I guess you mean to say bittorrent is faster to distribute files than http. If RPM is choose as the package format but don't want to use yum, HMS may need to implement another rpm based package management. Alternatively, this could just be a yum plugin. thats my 0.2 cents. But hey, if you want to invest your time in writing Yet Another Monitoring System ;-), I wish you all the best! > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16760-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 00:58:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C3F96C83 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81375 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:58:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81171 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 00:58:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81160 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 00:58:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:58:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:58:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033F74328FB for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:57:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <829323455.42387.1309136268010.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055258#comment-13055258 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------ The more I think about this and read the comments it is pretty clear what needs to happen. Eli already hinted at it, but I'm going to expand on his suggestion. This needs to get remade as a generic toolset and sent to the incubator as a generic Apache configuration management system. I can't think of any Apache licensed systems and this would be a good thing for the ASF to have in the portfolio. The biggest hurdle it has is the massive reliance on GPL'd bits. (There are so many components that this is a configuration management system that requires a configuration management system to actually configure...) As it currently stands, this functionality is completely outside of core Hadoop. So I'm already -1 on this going into common. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16761-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 02:08:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80CCC4C4A for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44652 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 02:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44592 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 02:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44584 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 02:08:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:08:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB7433212 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "steven zhuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <504300446.42541.1309140467421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1304349125.35232.1308881147698.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7425) ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure anything Configurable twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] steven zhuang updated HADOOP-7425: ---------------------------------- Description: In the setConf method of org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils, any instance of Configurable would be configured twice. In 0.21.0, KeyFieldBasedPartitioner implements the Configurable interface. When configured twice, it get two KeyDescription and gives out wrong partition number. public static void setConf(Object theObject, Configuration conf) { if (conf != null) { if (theObject instanceof Configurable) { ((Configurable) theObject).setConf(conf); } setJobConf(theObject, conf); } } was: In the setConf method of org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils, any instance of Configurable would be configured twice. In 0.21.0, KeyFieldBasedPartitioner implements the Configurable interface. When configured twice, it get two KeyDescription and gives out wrong partition number. public static void setConf(Object theObject, Configuration conf) { if (conf != null) { if (theObject instanceof Configurable) { ((Configurable) theObject).setConf(conf); } setJobConf(theObject, conf); } } Summary: ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure anything Configurable twice (was: ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure the KeyFieldBasedPartitioner twice in Hadoop 0.21.0, when KeyFieldBasedPartitioner is an Configurable instance) > ReflectionUtils.setConf would configure anything Configurable twice > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7425 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7425 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: steven zhuang > > In the setConf method of org.apache.hadoop.util.ReflectionUtils, any instance of Configurable would be configured twice. > In 0.21.0, KeyFieldBasedPartitioner implements the Configurable interface. When configured twice, it get two KeyDescription and gives out wrong partition number. > public static void setConf(Object theObject, Configuration conf) { > if (conf != null) { > if (theObject instanceof Configurable) { > ((Configurable) theObject).setConf(conf); > } > setJobConf(theObject, conf); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16762-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 02:45:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D8E24187 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67460 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 02:45:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67227 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 02:45:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67208 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 02:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:45:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FB5433B0A for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1634277813.42585.1309142687459.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-310: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Brock Noland (was: Owen O'Malley) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) +1, the patch looks good to me. Marking this as patch available so Hudson runs test-patch. I'll commit this pending clean Hudson results. Also reassigning this to you, Brock. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16763-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 03:05:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 644614E22 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73695 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:05:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73446 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:05:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73413 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 03:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:05:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A047B433EEA for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2105186611.42606.1309143887653.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055303#comment-13055303 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-310: ---------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483841/bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch against trunk revision 1139947. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/677//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/677//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/677//console This message is automatically generated. > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16764-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 03:41:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD4644D90 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87303 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87069 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87046 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98ABE4328E5 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:40:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <169876195.42637.1309146050622.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-310: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks a lot for the contribution, Brock! > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16765-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 03:41:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB1B84DA7 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87402 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87076 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87045 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 03:41:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:41:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8664328E2 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:40:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <396019667.42634.1309146050506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055310#comment-13055310 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7427: ------------------------------------- strange, what version of bash is this? is this on one of the build boxes or your own machine? > syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > [exec] Finished build. > [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' > BUILD FAILED > hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16766-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 05:17:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23B1A44C0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32086 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 05:17:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31710 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 05:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31681 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 05:17:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:17:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7520433E57 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Priyo Mustafi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <812798706.42710.1309151807812.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Priyo Mustafi updated HADOOP-7324: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7324.patch I have done some testing with 3.0 but not testing on 3.1 as we don't have 3.1 on our installation. I couldn't ascertain whether Ganglia can handle sparse updates so kept the default option as dense updates. If somebody can confirm that it can handle, sparse, then I can remove the logic for caching and doing dense updates. > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7324.patch > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16767-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 16:06:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91599483D for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26189 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 16:06:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25981 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 16:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25965 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 16:06:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:06:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A35243437C for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1410249436.44140.1309190747628.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055616#comment-13055616 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- Thanks for the nice patch, Priyo! Here is a preliminary review: # Like I mentioned in our email exchange, I'm hesitant to make the impl classes public and use them directly in the sink. It breaks abstraction that makes certain later optimizations impossible. A better approach would be using the builtin visitor interface. That said, it might be OK in 0.20.20x series, as they're mostly in maintenance mode. # In the #init, please log the exception instead of printStackTrace. # The #getTag method is only used to get the context of the record, which is unnecessary, as the record has a #context method. # The #parseSocket method is unnecessary, please reuse metrics2.util.Servers#parse. # The sparse/dense logic in #putMetrics can be improved a bit: the cache is looked up twice in dense mode. You can have #update method return the record once in dense mode. # Ganglia treats a metric as counter if slope is positive and gauge for anything else. Having to specify slope explicitly in the conf for every counter is a tedious chore we can avoid. This is a deficiency in the existing metrics1 implementation as well. > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7324.patch > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16768-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 16:49:10 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63D8644EE for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88434 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 16:49:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88346 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 16:49:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88318 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 16:49:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:49:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:49:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAEB43485B for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:48:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2091353978.44279.1309193328110.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055645#comment-13055645 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- bq. As part of this proposal, are there plans to update how hadoop daemon and client configurations are handled or is this specific to HMS? It is possible to add zeroconf to hadoop. There were discussion of zeroconf on and off in hadoop jiras and mailing list. bq. Bittorrent is a file sharing protocol and yum is a utility for rpm package management. I guess you mean to say bittorrent is faster to distribute files than http. If RPM is choose as the package format but don't want to use yum, HMS may need to implement another rpm based package management. HMS is currently designed to install software as a stack for the torrent implementation. If the RPM dependencies are not resolved with in the software stack or the base OS, it will fail the installation instead of resolving the dependency and download from yum. Hadoop software stack is small. Hence, Build time package dependencies declaration and release engineer blessed software stack should be sufficient for now. HMS does not intend to create another package management, but it can utilize platform's package management system. i.e. .rpm/.deb on linux, and .pkg on Mac. bq. Alternatively, this could just be a yum plugin. There is a yum bittorrent proposal back in 2008, but it has not come to fruit yet. We may utilize it, if this is implemented in the future. bq. The biggest hurdle it has is the massive reliance on GPL'd bits. (There are so many components that this is a configuration management system that requires a configuration management system to actually configure...) Allen, system call to GPL software does not automatically make caller GPL. See: [http://www.ifross.org/en/program-forks-gpl-licensed-program-system-or-vice-versa-call-derivative-work] HMS agent can call Linux utilities as long as the software runs in separated processes. Hence, your concern should be addressed. HMS has already ensure its libraries are Apache Software License or compatible license. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16769-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 17:17:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6651487F for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32887 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 17:17:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32790 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 17:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32772 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 17:17:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:17:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED9C4344C8 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <765428267.44377.1309195007450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055664#comment-13055664 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------ bq. Allen, system call to GPL software does not automatically make caller GPL. I'm fully aware of that. The problem is that there isn't much here outside of GPL'ed and other licensed code. This would be much more interesting and useful if it was self-contained. A configuration management system that needs a configuration management system to install sort of defeats the purpose. All of the great ones require a minuscule amount of stub in place before they can install themselves. I don't see that happening here. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16770-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 19:00:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDE1747E6 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67945 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 19:00:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67754 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 19:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67734 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 19:00:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:00:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:00:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCAC434D15 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1834208151.44579.1309201187454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055698#comment-13055698 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- bq. This would be much more interesting and useful if it was self-contained. A configuration management system that needs a configuration management system to install sort of defeats the purpose. All of the great ones require a minuscule amount of stub in place before they can install themselves. I don't see that happening here. There is a difference between configuration management system and package management system. The statements above are mixing package management with configuration management. For package management system, HMS can tap into existing package management system provided by the OS. HMS also supports tarball deployment, and role based software stack installation. Hence, it does not require a package management system to operate, if the customer choose to use tarball only. In the base OS, there is nothing manages configuration files for Hadoop. Configuration management is usually operate through template and scripting. Operation can use puppet to configure the system, and commit the configuration files to source tree repository. Chef uses MangoDB to store states. HMS tracks the configuration history and store the state changes in Zookeeper. For both package and config management, there are strong cases to use HMS than generic deployment system because HMS can provide better deployment experience and improve deployment efficiency. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16771-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 19:40:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6A0B41C0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13292 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 19:40:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13035 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 19:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13027 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 19:40:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:40:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:40:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3744352AA for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7428 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: {code} synchronized (Connection.this.out) { {code} Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16772-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 22:17:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7FA04569 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18529 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 22:17:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18286 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 22:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18266 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 22:17:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:17:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:17:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A7D435632 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Priyo Mustafi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1562847727.45084.1309213007798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Priyo Mustafi reassigned HADOOP-7324: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Priyo Mustafi > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Priyo Mustafi > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7324.patch > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16773-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Jun 27 22:32:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB6C348E7 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39702 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 22:32:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39569 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2011 22:32:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39561 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2011 22:32:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B674132B9 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:32:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <726006040.15.1309213955687.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055883#comment-13055883 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7427: ------------------------------------------------ {noformat} $ bash --version GNU bash, version 3.00.15(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. {noformat} > syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > [exec] Finished build. > [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' > BUILD FAILED > hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16774-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:01:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8399841FF for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74980 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:01:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74759 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74751 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:01:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:01:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:01:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E34152EE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:01:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jagane Sundar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1589822549.187.1309219277624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056217#comment-13056217 ] Jagane Sundar commented on HADOOP-7417: --------------------------------------- Let me expand a little bit on Eric's explanation: HMS is a full lifecycle management system for Hadoop. It can create hadoop clusters, automatically manage the configuration of hadoop clusters, tear down hadoop clusters and upgrade hadoop clusters. HMS consists of highly available HMS Controller(s). A HMS Agent on each Hadoop Node communicates with the HMS Controller(s). HMS Users issue commands to the HMS Controller using a REST API. Example commands can create/teardown/configure/upgrade Hadoop clusters. HMS aspires to use OS native packaging mechanisms for installing hadoop, i.e. rpms on RedHat, .debs on Debian/Ubu. tarball installation for unsupported Unix like operating systems is also supported. HMS differs from Chef/Puppet and other deployment frameworks in several important ways. 1. HMS is built to be highly available from day 1. HMS controllers can die and be restarted. HMS Agents and the machines they run on can spontaneously reboot. HMS itself will continue to be available. 2. HMS is meant to scale to the size of a 20,000 plus server Datacenter. 3. HMS is designed to be the building block for constructing a self service Hadoop cloud, wherein users can create/configure/teardown Hadoops. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16775-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:13:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F6AA4127 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85218 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85166 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85155 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD474157E7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1272267415.238.1309219997893.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch, HADOOP-7399.9.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16776-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:13:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C567B4132 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85472 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85177 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85167 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4E4157F1 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <192564212.247.1309219998261.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch, HADOOP-7399.9.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16777-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:13:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26C674142 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85765 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85713 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85695 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:13:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A444157DD for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <744599249.229.1309219997482.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7399.9.patch Updated patch, with a little more cleaned up interfaces. The server uses special "calls" for sasl messages as well. I have maintained the same mechanism by adding a SaslServerCall that implements ServerCall. SaslServerCall is not RpcEngine specific and still uses Writable because client assumes a writable format. Encoding of sasl messages could also be delegated to the RpcEngine but I would prefer to do that in a separate jira. > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch, HADOOP-7399.9.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16778-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:35:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E84D4397 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5952 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5893 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5883 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:35:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:35:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:35:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CB3415FF5 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:35:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <277866513.279.1309221317417.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1593248389.10179.1308212149301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7399) Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056229#comment-13056229 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7399: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484365/HADOOP-7399.9.patch against trunk revision 1140010. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1078 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1067 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 3 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/678//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/678//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/678//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove Writable from ipc.Client and ipc.Server. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7399 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7399 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7399.3.patch, HADOOP-7399.9.patch > > > This jira proposes to remove the dependency of ipc client and server on Writable. I think this will be an important step towards making an RpcEngine truly configurable, without having to use tunnel protocols as in case of AvroRPCEngine. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16779-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 00:37:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2060843EA for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6746 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:37:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6710 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 00:37:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6699 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 00:37:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:37:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:37:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C544160A1 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:37:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <480132221.284.1309221437425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056231#comment-13056231 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------------ Something has to maintain the packages and config settings of HMS itself. "Kickstart" is not a valid answer. Something else being missed here is that Hadoop is just one component of a working data center. If I have to deploy bcfg2/puppet/chef/cfengine/... to manage my LDAP, Azkaban, Voldemort, ... nodes, why would I have something different for Hadoop when I can just use the pre-existing services? (Most of these systems are HA and can handle 20k nodes if one knows how to deploy them properly.) Also, why isn't this just rolled into Whirr? Isn't the whole point of that project software provisioning for "cloud" services? Yet another reason this doesn't belong in Hadoop-proper. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16780-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 01:27:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92D0D40BC for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47208 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 01:27:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47138 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 01:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47123 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 01:27:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66E3418273 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Priyo Mustafi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1338937605.398.1309224436875.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Priyo Mustafi updated HADOOP-7324: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7324.patch New patch with Luke's suggested changes > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Priyo Mustafi > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7324.patch, HADOOP-7324.patch > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16781-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:15:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92E7862CA for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17110 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:14:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16838 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16820 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:14:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:14:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:14:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208C8435E36 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:14:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7429) Common side of HDFS-2110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Common side of HDFS-2110 ------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7429 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins Priority: Minor Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16782-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:17:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 677AC6AD5 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19484 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:17:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19212 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19176 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:16:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D36435EF5 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <58403908.747.1309238177131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7429) Common side of HDFS-2110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7429-1.patch Common side of the HDFS-2110 patch attached. > Common side of HDFS-2110 > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16783-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:17:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3C616B49 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19567 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19244 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19175 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:16:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37592435EF7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:16:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1883852052.749.1309238177223.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7429) Common side of HDFS-2110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) atm reviewed this on HDFS-2110. > Common side of HDFS-2110 > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16784-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:20:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37FC6A50 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21986 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21748 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21680 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:20:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:20:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:20:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E311435088 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:20:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jagane Sundar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1006102642.757.1309238417382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056315#comment-13056315 ] Jagane Sundar commented on HADOOP-7417: --------------------------------------- The goal of HMS is to provide a Hadoop specific management platform. While chef/puppet/bcfg2 and other scripted deployment tools are useful for simpler software, a complex software platform such as Hadoop could benefit from a management platform that is custom built for it. With the hadoop.next platform starting to take shape, the job of installing and configuring Hadoop is going to need even more sophisticated technology. It is critical to look at management of Hadoop from a holistic perspective. HMS plays nice with existing packaging mechanisms such as .rpms, .debs and tar files, which are the finest granularity building blocks. Alan - I don't understand your comparison of Whirr with HMS. HMS has the potential to provide the ability for cloud service providers to provide a clone of Elastic Map Reduce. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Whirr a set of scripts for deploying Hadoop on an IaaS cloud? > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16785-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:26:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02B156AB7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23229 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:26:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23063 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:26:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23018 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:26:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F943435290 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:26:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <718942487.795.1309238779453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056317#comment-13056317 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------- HMS is a separate project for the ecosystem of Hadoop related projects, this is out of scope for Hadoop common. How about moving the discussion of Whirr, HMS etc to the incubator thread. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16786-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:33:01 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 184B06C19 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27623 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:33:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27338 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:32:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27300 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:32:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:46 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822B54354C2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1716662269.803.1309239146529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Common side of HDFS-2110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056320#comment-13056320 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7429: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484392/hadoop-7429-1.patch against trunk revision 1140010. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/679//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/679//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/679//console This message is automatically generated. > Common side of HDFS-2110 > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16787-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:33:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E94566C6C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28155 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:33:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27356 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27299 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:32:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:46 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1834354C3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:32:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <499957638.804.1309239146570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Common side of HDFS-2110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056321#comment-13056321 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7429: ------------------------------------- This is mostly cleanup, the new IOUtils method is tested in HDFS-2110. > Common side of HDFS-2110 > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16788-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:34:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC09616E for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29146 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29062 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29026 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539934355C4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <15167716.810.1309239257338.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Summary: Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method (was: Common side of HDFS-2110) > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16789-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:34:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46AF5617C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29426 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29164 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29022 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:34:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6760A4355C6 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:34:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1747673115.812.1309239257420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056322#comment-13056322 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7429: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484392/hadoop-7429-1.patch against trunk revision 1140010. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/680//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/680//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/680//console This message is automatically generated. > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16790-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 05:36:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FDCC61C1 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31779 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31448 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 05:36:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31423 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 05:36:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:36:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:36:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7D94356D4 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:36:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1244595049.814.1309239377120.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks atm! > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16791-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 07:13:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9F2761B7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17681 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 07:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17267 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 07:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17215 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 07:12:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCD7436287 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1254454082.946.1309245137311.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1875258417.25075.1308677148252.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7409) TestTFileByteArrays is failing on Hudson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-7409. --------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Looks like a dupe. > TestTFileByteArrays is failing on Hudson > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7409 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7409 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > This test has failed in the last 4 nightly builds, as seen here: https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/ > I can't reproduce this failure on my machine, running the test either in isolation or as part of the full suite. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16792-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 07:14:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AFD762C3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20939 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 07:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20778 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 07:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20749 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 07:14:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:14:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:14:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A554363BA for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:14:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1723276134.955.1309245257757.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <7539864.45541295391523753.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7111) Several TFile tests failing when native libraries are present MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056358#comment-13056358 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7111: ------------------------------------- Strange, bi-secting on my host leads to HADOOP-7206 but that was committed after these tests started failing, must be triggering something. > Several TFile tests failing when native libraries are present > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7111 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7111 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > When running tests with native libraries present, TestTFileByteArrays and TestTFileJClassComparatorByteArrays fail on trunk. They don't seem to fail in 0.20 with native libraries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16793-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 16:20:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CBB76233 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99473 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:20:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98835 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:20:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98799 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 16:20:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:20:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:20:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5957F4377EE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ravi Prakash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1225328612.2229.1309278017362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7430) Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue ------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7430 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Ravi Prakash Assignee: Ravi Prakash Priority: Minor -rm command doesn't suggest -skipTrash on failure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16794-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 16:24:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEBC263AE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14271 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14214 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14201 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2C4437A8B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ravi Prakash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <695982236.2244.1309278256968.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1225328612.2229.1309278017362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7430) Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056610#comment-13056610 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HADOOP-7430: -------------------------------------- Courtesy Rajit Saha {quote}https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6203 surfaces again. now -rmr is depreciated and using -rm -R and not seeing following messeges in output Consider using -skipTrash option and Problem with Trash.The NameSpace quota (directories and files) of directory /user/someUser is exceeded: quota=5 file count=6 The only messege coming - rm: Failed to move to trash: hdfs://localhost:8020/user/someUser/a/b/c {quote} Also from Rajit, {quote}found another scenario when "use -skipTrash" is not promted $hdfs dfs -rm -R . rm: Cannot move "hdfs://:8020/user/" to the trash, as it contains the trash Previously same command use to print the following Problem with Trash.. Consider using -skipTrash option rm: Cannot move "hdfs://:8020/user/" to the trash, as it contains the trash" {quote} > Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7430 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Prakash > Assignee: Ravi Prakash > Priority: Minor > > -rm command doesn't suggest -skipTrash on failure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16795-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 16:34:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDF666C84 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34750 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:34:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34686 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34675 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 16:34:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:34:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:34:36 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9068437FB1 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:34:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1489441278.2267.1309278856885.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7431) Test DiskChecker's functionality in identifying bad directories (Part 2 of testing DiskChecker) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Test DiskChecker's functionality in identifying bad directories (Part 2 of testing DiskChecker) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7431 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7431 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: test, util Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Harsh J Assignee: Harsh J Fix For: 0.23.0 Add a test for the DiskChecker#checkDir method used in other projects (HDFS). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16796-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 16:59:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24537688F for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80942 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:59:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80885 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80873 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 16:59:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136ED436ED9 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1451299663.2378.1309280358076.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 56628#comment-13056628 ]=20 Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- Echo on Jagane's comments. According to Hadoop mission statement: The Apache=E2=84=A2 Hadoop=E2=84=A2 project develops open-source software f= or reliable, scalable, distributed computing. HMS is aligned with Hadoop mission statement. HMS is a tool to build Infra= structure as a Service cloud, and Whirr is a tool to build Platform as a Se= rvice. There are differences between them. HMS can provide deep OS integr= ation for Hadoop, i.e. deploy a Kerbrose enabled Hadoop cluster with LDAP i= ntegration in cooperate environment. It will also provide hooks to remove = defected nodes from operation, and bring up new nodes into the infrastructu= re. Whirr provides the other end of spectrum where it provides a platform for d= evelopers to code, test and experiment new software without the complexity = of setting up and maintaining test, development and production servers. Both model should coexist, but HMS will require tighter integration with Ha= doop to enhance Hadoop's presence in the cooperate environment. Additional = input from Hadoop PMC can help to decide the right path for HMS. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component arou= nd management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes soft= ware installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment aut= omation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16797-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:07:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6F80611B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95918 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95808 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95797 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E347343735B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <732418322.2423.1309280837927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056637#comment-13056637 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7417: ------------------------------------- That's cool, the mailing list is a better forum for discussing HMS and Whirr than a common jira, how about we move this to common-dev? > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16798-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:07:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA557612C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96144 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96100 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96092 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:07:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F099437365 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <697240772.2432.1309280838189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056638#comment-13056638 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7324: --------------------------------- Thanks Priyo, the patch is coming together nicely. More issues I missed/noticed: # Breaking the MetricsCache API requires the approval of release manager for branch-0.20-security. It'd be better if we can keep the existing MetricsCache#getMetric method intact and add a #getMetricInstance for the object. # You can have the abstract sink implement the visitor interface to avoid creating new instances of the visitor in #putMetrics. # It'll be nice to have a unit test for these sinks. We can mock the datagramSocket to capture the packet with mockito. > Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7324 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Priyo Mustafi > Priority: Blocker > Labels: regression > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7324.patch, HADOOP-7324.patch > > > Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, most users are using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16799-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:28:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A557D6D39 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38797 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:28:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38683 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:28:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38675 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:28:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:28:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:28:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266CF437BEF for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:28:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1046887389.2495.1309282097153.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7428: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7428.txt Here's a patch which demonstrates the issue. The unit test is a little bit contrived, but does demonstrate the issue and act as a regression test. > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16800-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:30:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD0A76152 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40861 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:30:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40802 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40794 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:30:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43545437CFF for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:30:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <951629238.2503.1309282217271.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7428: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16801-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:40:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9866365F8 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60997 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60925 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60907 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:40:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:40:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:40:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862F14372AA for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:40:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1574128798.2539.1309282817546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056659#comment-13056659 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7305: ------------------------------------- I apologize for the delay -- I was unexpectedly unavailable over a week. I did test that if JAVA_HOME is set to the JDK dir for Linux that this patch isn't strictly necessary, but it certainly doesn't hurt as a convenience if JAVA_HOME is set to the JRE. +1 if the OS X section is changed to just the following: {code} + + + + {code} Via the web, I found this to be the preferred path and I have confirmed that it works. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-05-30.patch, HADOOP-7305-2011-06-09.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16802-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:44:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89F3B66F8 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69933 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69748 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69718 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BC6437578 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1553819637.2587.1309283057360.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056669#comment-13056669 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7427: ------------------------------------- wow, that's pretty old. curious, what platform is that? RHEL5 seems to have 3.2.25. We can probably figure out different syntax to work on your system > syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > [exec] Finished build. > [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' > BUILD FAILED > hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16803-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:44:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56541670B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70261 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69878 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69743 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:44:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC8E43757D for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <947619245.2592.1309283057504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056670#comment-13056670 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7428: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484478/hadoop-7428.txt against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/681//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/681//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/681//console This message is automatically generated. > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16804-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 17:50:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E45E6DFD for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79319 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79133 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 17:50:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79117 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 17:50:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B03437824 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <310854172.2620.1309283417851.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <407429641.30834.1308786767442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7417) Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056672#comment-13056672 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7417: ----------------------------------- bq. That's cool, the mailing list is a better forum for discussing HMS and Whirr than a common jira, how about we move this to common-dev? Sounds good. > Hadoop Management System (Umbrella) > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7417 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7417 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6, Linux > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > The primary goal of Hadoop Management System is to build a component around management and deployment of Hadoop related projects. This includes software installation, configuration, application orchestration, deployment automation and monitoring Hadoop. > Prototype demo source code can be obtained from: > http://github.com/macroadster/hms -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16805-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 18:18:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 351DA6EB1 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24381 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:18:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23864 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:18:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23849 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 18:18:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3694A4375FE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1675021955.2746.1309285097219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056692#comment-13056692 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7427: ------------------------------------------------ Here is the OS information. {noformat} Linux 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux {noformat} > syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > [exec] Finished build. > [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' > BUILD FAILED > hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16806-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 18:48:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 623716FA3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70159 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:48:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70107 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:48:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70067 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 18:48:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:48:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:48:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5EE437276 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:48:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <993557994.2811.1309286897497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <817618820.42234.1309133387608.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7427) syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056704#comment-13056704 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7427: ------------------------------------- RHEL4? > syntax error in smart-apply-patch.sh > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7427 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7427 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > > {noformat} > [exec] Finished build. > [exec] hdfs/src/test/bin/smart-apply-patch.sh: line 60: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token `(' > BUILD FAILED > hdfs/build.xml:1595: exec returned: 1 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16807-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 18:58:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6719F6370 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96943 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:58:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96878 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 18:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96870 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 18:58:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:58:38 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA6243758F for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:58:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Reed (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <594450095.2834.1309287497376.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Benjamin Reed updated HADOOP-7414: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7414_2.patch this patch only adds a / on the end if it is needed. > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch, HADOOP-7414_2.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16808-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 19:14:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B0A6B9D for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11219 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 19:14:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11183 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 19:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11165 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 19:14:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:14:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:14:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216A2437ABA for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:14:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <181039336.2871.1309288457133.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1443063883.27446.1308722147425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7414) path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056713#comment-13056713 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7414: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484485/HADOOP-7414_2.patch against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/682//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/682//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/682//console This message is automatically generated. > path to setWar() in HttpServer is not setup properly for resources from Jar URLs > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7414 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7414 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Benjamin Reed > Attachments: HADOOP-7414.patch, HADOOP-7414_2.patch > > > the path in setWar() needs to end in a '/' for jetty to properly process resources from Jar URLs. by adding a '/' at the end the webapps can run out of a Jar file instead of unzipping into a file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16809-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 19:43:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9647E6E70 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53319 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 19:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53069 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 19:43:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53058 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 19:43:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44D54373FE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1235333878.2911.1309290197800.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056720#comment-13056720 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7298: ------------------------------------- Looks good to me. Suresh, mind looking at this latest patch? Harsh's patch for MAPREDUCE-1347 depends on this. > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt, hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16810-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 21:43:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E593659B for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20657 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 21:43:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20197 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 21:43:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20188 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 21:43:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9B1413969 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Look (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <492511776.199.1309297409060.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Look updated HADOOP-7418: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7418.txt I redid my patch to handle the case of >2 slashes, and added a couple of unit tests as you suggested. When running the test suite, I had some tests hang due to timeouts, but no failures. I tried running the pre-patch versions of HDFS's test suite, and for instance, TestHDFSCLI times out because it can't connect to a namenode. Similar outcomes for a number of other tests: TestLargeBlock, TestReplaceDataNodeOnFailure... Will the Jenkins instance run these for me? > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7418.txt, HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16811-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 21:49:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FCC46C2F for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28586 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 21:49:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28535 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 21:49:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28527 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 21:49:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EE4413C75 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:49:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <128463663.214.1309297768918.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056809#comment-13056809 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7418: ---------------------------------------- bq. Will the Jenkins instance run these for me? Jenkins will only run the tests for the Common sub-project, since this is a JIRA for Common. I'll take a look at this patch and try to run some of tests you mention that timed out. We see a few notoriously flaky tests fail spuriously pretty often, but not usually these, and not usually with timeouts. > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7418.txt, HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16812-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 22:03:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 943CC6332 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52068 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:03:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51717 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:03:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51708 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 22:03:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:03:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:03:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B48841322A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:03:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1344860584.251.1309298609305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056816#comment-13056816 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7418: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484565/HADOOP-7418.txt against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/683//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/683//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/683//console This message is automatically generated. > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7418.txt, HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16813-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 22:51:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E58561B6 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22276 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:51:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22223 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 22:51:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22215 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 22:51:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F02B4130FC for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Look (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1399346697.466.1309301488582.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7418) support for multiple slashes in the path separator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13056865#comment-13056865 ] Andrew Look commented on HADOOP-7418: ------------------------------------- Great, thanks Aaron! I'm running OS X Snow Leopard so that may be causing problems on my end... I've heard of others having trouble building the C++ libraries in HDFS (see http://cxwangyi.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html ) and apparently some mods need to be made to get things to run correctly. Have you heard of any such issues on OS X? > support for multiple slashes in the path separator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7418 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux running JDK 1.6 > Reporter: Sudharsan Sampath > Assignee: Andrew Look > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7418.txt, HDFS-1460.txt, HDFS-1460.txt > > > the parsing of the input path string to identify the uri authority conflicts with the file system paths. For instance the following is a valid path in both the linux file system and the hdfs. > //user/directory1//directory2. > While this works perfectly fine in the command line for manipulating hdfs, the same fails when specified as the input path for a mapper class with the following expcetion. > Exception in thread "main" java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host: user > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.(Client.java:195) > as the org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path class assumes the string that follows the '//' to be an uri authority -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16814-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Jun 28 23:11:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C4116CD2 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54975 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 23:11:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54905 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 23:11:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54894 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 23:11:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:11:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:11:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8319841385C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:11:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <347121513.495.1309302688533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7429-2.patch Minor update, add a close parameter. > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16815-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 01:40:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61E506F77 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97074 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 01:40:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96850 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 01:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96840 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 01:40:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:40:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:40:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC7438BD1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:40:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1029638806.870.1309311629220.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Zhou resolved HADOOP-7339. ------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Assignee: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16816-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 05:42:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EC784759 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54915 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 05:42:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54445 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 05:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54396 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 05:41:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:41:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:41:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA87D4380F1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:41:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1981182038.1204.1309326089695.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057011#comment-13057011 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- Can we include Sonar stuff here as well? Here INFRA-3645 is the almost working patch for HDFS which I am sure can be scaled to the Common with ease. If there's no objection I can update the patch. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-6671-cross-project-HDFS.patch, HADOOP-6671-e.patch, HADOOP-6671-f.patch, HADOOP-6671-g.patch, HADOOP-6671-h.patch, HADOOP-6671-i.patch, HADOOP-6671-j.patch, HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, common-mvn-layout-i.sh, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout-e.sh, mvn-layout-f.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16817-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 05:44:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 844504778 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55327 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 05:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55060 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 05:43:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55040 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 05:43:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:43:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:43:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72874438199 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:43:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1308675070.1213.1309326208465.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1221804712.25214.1308677867694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7412) Mavenization Umbrella MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057012#comment-13057012 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7412: -------------------------------------------- I am suggesting to considering the inclusion of INFRA-3645's patch. > Mavenization Umbrella > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7412 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7412 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > > Umbrella JIRA for all Mavenization JIRAs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16818-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E76C4AC1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73705 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72785 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72683 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:11:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CF14393A3 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <955644710.1745.1309338691802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057095#comment-13057095 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6929: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch, h-6929.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16819-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFE224ACB for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74447 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73656 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72681 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:11:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44630439391 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2146721356.1729.1309338691276.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057094#comment-13057094 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16820-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 803314AD3 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74790 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74383 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72685 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:11:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782A4393A5 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <867835813.1747.1309338691871.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057096#comment-13057096 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16821-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F074AE5 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75089 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74741 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72655 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062C1439358 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1068486762.1677.1309338689021.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057093#comment-13057093 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-310: ------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16822-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 689EC4AFD for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75404 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75088 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72659 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:11:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F191C4393A8 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <202408076.1750.1309338691986.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057097#comment-13057097 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7385: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16823-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:12:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 477684B0C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75706 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75410 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72870 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ED44393B0 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <441525181.1758.1309338692340.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057099#comment-13057099 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16824-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:13:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 400F44B1F for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75963 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75741 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72851 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50DA4393BD for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <40432215.1768.1309338692738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <55510245.12688.1307747698852.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7379) Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057100#comment-13057100 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7379: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Add ability to include Protobufs in ObjectWritable > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7379 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7379 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io, ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7379.txt, hadoop-7379.txt > > > Per HDFS-2060, it would make it easier to piecemeal switch to protocol buffer based data structures in the wire protocol if we could intermix the two. The IPC framework currently provides the concept of "engines" for RPC, but that doesn't easily allow mixed types within the same framework for ease of transition. > I'd like to add the cases to ObjectWritable to be handle subclasses of {{Message}}, the superclass of codegenned protobufs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16825-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:13:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D15A64B43 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76639 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75988 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72826 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFE84393AB for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1032632055.1753.1309338692123.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057098#comment-13057098 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7402: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16826-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:13:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 317034B56 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76914 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76683 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72849 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17624393C2 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <80265614.1771.1309338692854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <151121036.11705.1307734619237.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7377) Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057101#comment-13057101 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7377: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Fix command name handling affecting DFSAdmin > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7377 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7377 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7377.patch > > > When an error occurs in the get/set quota commands in DFSAdmin, they are displaying the following: > setQuota: failed to get SetQuotaCommand.NAME > The {{Command}} class expects the {{NAME}} field to be accessible, but for DFSAdmin, it's not. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16827-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:13:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2782C4B61 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77198 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76915 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72854 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7564393C9 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1542819967.1778.1309338693105.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1481744229.2736.1308062747508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7390) VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057103#comment-13057103 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7390: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > VersionInfo not generated properly in git after unsplit > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7390 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7390.txt > > > The version information generated during the build of common when running from git has revision and branch Unknown. I believe this started after the unsplit: > @HadoopVersionAnnotation(version="0.22.0-SNAPSHOT", revision="Unknown", branch="Unknown", > user="tgraves", date="Tue Jun 14 13:39:10 UTC 2011", url="file:///home/tgraves/git/hadoop-common/common", > srcChecksum="0f78ea668971fe51e7ebf4f97f84eed2") > The ./src/saveVersion.sh script which generates the package-info.java file with the version info looks for the presence of .git directory and that is now a level up instead of in the common directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16828-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 09:13:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5B484B65 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77424 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77362 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 09:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72862 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:12:13 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14E24393C6 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <966403414.1775.1309338692985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057102#comment-13057102 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7407: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #43 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/43/]) > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16829-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:17:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18B0C4D3F for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71815 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71159 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70764 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEFF439EC2 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <310120105.2036.1309346249058.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057155#comment-13057155 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-310: ------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16830-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 502694D73 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72127 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71773 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70767 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A518E439EFB for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <366921909.2092.1309346251673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057158#comment-13057158 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7385: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16831-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FD584DBD for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72428 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72219 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71120 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7AE439EFF for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1859867063.2096.1309346252502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1758842790.15942.1308336467619.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7402) TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057159#comment-13057159 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7402: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > TestConfiguration doesn't clean up after itself > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7402 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7402.0.patch, hadoop-7402.1.patch > > > {{testGetFile}} and {{testGetLocalPath}} both create directories a, b, and c in the working directory from where the tests are run. They should clean up after themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16832-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 261094DF1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72710 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72409 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71160 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800C5439EF7 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <22865619.2088.1309346251521.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057156#comment-13057156 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16833-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDB664E0E for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72944 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72695 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71161 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:17:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93405439EF9 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2035351407.2090.1309346251600.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057157#comment-13057157 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16834-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A60924F49 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74287 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74207 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74186 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B238D439F05 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2100227831.2101.1309346252726.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057160#comment-13057160 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16835-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 11:18:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFFAB4F81 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74578 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74289 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74191 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 11:18:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:18:10 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD05E439F09 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1061220275.2105.1309346252902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057161#comment-13057161 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7407: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #732 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/732/]) > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16836-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 14:45:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9271E4AE6 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27121 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26529 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26341 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:11 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9106439F69 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:44:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1393669049.2629.1309358670754.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057262#comment-13057262 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #722 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/722/]) > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, gitk-example.png, mailer-conf.diff > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16837-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 14:45:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 783974D62 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28649 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27989 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27965 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 14:45:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:45:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71687439FC0 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:44:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <821144565.2697.1309358673461.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1507121853.1613.1307925711791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7384) Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057271#comment-13057271 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7384: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #722 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/722/]) > Allow test-patch to be more flexible about patch format > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7384 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7384 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7384.txt > > > Right now the test-patch process only accepts patches that are generated as "-p0" relative to common/, hdfs/, or mapreduce/. This has always been annoying for git users where the default patch format is -p1. It's also now annoying for SVN users who may generate a patch relative to trunk/ instead of the subproject subdirectory. We should auto-detect the correct patch level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16838-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 19:10:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D9C14875 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91781 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 19:10:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91340 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 19:10:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91176 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 19:10:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED19D4393E1 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ravi Prakash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <510946152.3395.1309374628967.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1225328612.2229.1309278017362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7430) Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Prakash updated HADOOP-7430: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7430.1.patch Attaching a patch to fix this regression. This patch applies to trunk revision 1141162. Could someone please answer two of my questions? 1. In Trash.java I'm having to do a {noformat}cause.toString().indexOf("QuotaExceededException") != -1 {noformat} to find if the Exception was a QuotaExceededException (and then too it is not deterministic (what if the message contained that string?)). I would love to do an instanceOf but then HDFS would be added as a dependency to common (QuotaExceededException is defined in HDFS). How can I circumvent this / should I circumvent this? Can you please point me to a pre-existing discussion if one exists? 2. Similarly in TestTrash.java, to test that the message is also displayed when quota is exceeded, I should call setQuota() in hdfs/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSNamesystem.java. Again, I'd have to add HDFS as a dependency for testing. I haven't done it in this patch. Also, when I ran test-patch on this, I got {noformat} [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. {noformat} Here's test-patch's javadoc output {noformat} [exec] [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information... [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/SecurityUtil.java:40: warning: sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Util is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] import sun.security.jgss.krb5.Krb5Util; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/SecurityUtil.java:41: warning: sun.security.krb5.Credentials is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] import sun.security.krb5.Credentials; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/SecurityUtil.java:42: warning: sun.security.krb5.PrincipalName is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] import sun.security.krb5.PrincipalName; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/KerberosName.java:31: warning: sun.security.krb5.Config is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] import sun.security.krb5.Config; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/KerberosName.java:32: warning: sun.security.krb5.KrbException is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] import sun.security.krb5.KrbException; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/KerberosName.java:81: warning: sun.security.krb5.Config is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [exec] [javadoc] private static Config kerbConf; [exec] [javadoc] ^ [exec] [javadoc] ExcludePrivateAnnotationsStandardDoclet [exec] [javadoc] javadoc: warning - Error fetching URL: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/package-list [exec] [javadoc] Standard Doclet version 1.6.0_01 [exec] [javadoc] Building tree for all the packages and classes... [exec] [javadoc] Building index for all the packages and classes... [exec] [javadoc] Building index for all classes... [exec] [javadoc] Generating /home/raviprak/Code/hadoop/svn/svnhadoop-common/common/build/docs/api/stylesheet.css... [exec] [javadoc] 7 warnings [exec] [exec] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [exec] Total time: 3 minutes 48 seconds [exec] [exec] [exec] There appear to be 7 javadoc warnings generated by the patched build. {noformat} But I didn't mess with any files. :( Any clues why I'm -1? Thanks > Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7430 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Prakash > Assignee: Ravi Prakash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7430.1.patch > > > -rm command doesn't suggest -skipTrash on failure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16839-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 21:52:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F6504D36 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46600 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 21:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46308 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 21:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46295 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 21:52:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:52:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:52:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C164B43A815 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:52:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ravi Prakash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <984905995.3866.1309384348789.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1225328612.2229.1309278017362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7430) Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Prakash updated HADOOP-7430: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7430 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Prakash > Assignee: Ravi Prakash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7430.1.patch > > > -rm command doesn't suggest -skipTrash on failure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16840-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 22:14:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C35F64A58 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74129 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:14:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73716 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:14:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73686 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 22:14:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:14:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:14:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AD943A144 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <442901305.3945.1309385669015.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1225328612.2229.1309278017362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7430) Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057512#comment-13057512 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7430: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484676/HADOOP-7430.1.patch against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/684//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/684//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/684//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve error message when moving to trash fails due to quota issue > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7430 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7430 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Ravi Prakash > Assignee: Ravi Prakash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7430.1.patch > > > -rm command doesn't suggest -skipTrash on failure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16841-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 22:39:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D60F4ABC for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96968 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:39:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96901 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:39:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96887 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 22:39:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399143A846 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sherry Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7432 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sherry Chen Assignee: Sherry Chen HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16842-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 22:43:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45D094B62 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 934 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 857 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 833 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077EF43A979 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sherry Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1369468418.4000.1309387409027.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sherry Chen updated HADOOP-7432: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7432.patch Back-ported HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security. > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16843-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 22:43:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ADC64B72 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1191 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 868 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 835 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 22:43:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207CA43A97C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:43:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sherry Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <469896139.4003.1309387409130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sherry Chen updated HADOOP-7432: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Manual test result: [exec] [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Finished build. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16844-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 22:53:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDCA24431 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16689 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:53:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16345 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 22:53:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16330 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 22:53:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702C243ACFF for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:53:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1403843086.4064.1309388009456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057536#comment-13057536 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7432: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484697/HADOOP-7432.patch against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/685//console This message is automatically generated. > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16845-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 23:13:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 899774F22 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49329 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:13:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49256 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:13:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49248 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 23:13:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:13:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:13:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E1543930D for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:13:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <276265505.4104.1309389208496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7433) Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur Fix For: 0.23.0 The SO file/links are copied into lib/native/, they should be copied to lib/native/$OS_ARCH -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16846-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 23:19:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4BEF4668 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55908 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55873 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55851 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAB44395F6 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <60281614.4125.1309389568909.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <276265505.4104.1309389208496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7433) Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7433: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7433.patch > Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7433.patch > > > The SO file/links are copied into lib/native/, they should be copied to lib/native/$OS_ARCH -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16847-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 23:19:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26B534685 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56122 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55894 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55858 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 23:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD3B4395FC for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <367778316.4127.1309389568958.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <276265505.4104.1309389208496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7433) Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7433: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7433.patch > > > The SO file/links are copied into lib/native/, they should be copied to lib/native/$OS_ARCH -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16848-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Jun 29 23:33:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C59704EDF for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71568 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:33:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71544 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 23:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71535 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 23:33:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F8C43999E for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1771618740.4132.1309390408479.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <276265505.4104.1309389208496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7433) Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057549#comment-13057549 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7433: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484703/HADOOP-7433.patch against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/686//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/686//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/686//console This message is automatically generated. > Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7433.patch > > > The SO file/links are copied into lib/native/, they should be copied to lib/native/$OS_ARCH -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16849-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 02:01:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 605CD6018 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97022 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:01:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96973 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96957 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 02:01:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:01:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D30043AC5F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:01:30 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?=E4=B8=A5=E9=87=91=E5=8F=8C_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <300592700.4296.1309399290050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7434) there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -setlevel" with illegal level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -set= level" with illegal level ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7434 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: =E4=B8=A5=E9=87=91=E5=8F=8C While using the command with inexistent "level" like "nomsg", there is no e= rror message displayed,and the level "DEBUG" is set by default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16850-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 02:13:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 656896E74 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11370 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:13:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11342 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11334 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 02:13:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:13:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD1F43AE89 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:13:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <253534842.4301.1309400008381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <300592700.4296.1309399290050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7434) there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -setlevel" with illegal level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7434: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7434 Fixed this issue. The error msg will be displayed as follow while the command with illegal le= vel. Submitted Level: ERRORLEVEL Bad level "ERRORLEVEL" > there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -s= etlevel" with illegal level > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: =E4=B8=A5=E9=87=91=E5=8F=8C > Attachments: HADOOP-7434 > > > While using the command with inexistent "level" like "nomsg", there is no= error message displayed,and the level "DEBUG" is set by default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16851-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 02:15:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A15FD60A7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13511 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:15:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13362 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:15:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13351 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 02:15:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:15:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:15:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6608843AF7B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:15:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1448314972.4303.1309400128414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <300592700.4296.1309399290050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7434) there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -setlevel" with illegal level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7434: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -s= etlevel" with illegal level > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: =E4=B8=A5=E9=87=91=E5=8F=8C > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7434 > > > While using the command with inexistent "level" like "nomsg", there is no= error message displayed,and the level "DEBUG" is set by default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16852-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 02:33:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D8FD6861 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29009 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:33:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27827 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 02:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27646 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 02:33:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:33:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:33:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A3443A474 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:33:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1230569784.4325.1309401208658.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <300592700.4296.1309399290050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7434) there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -setlevel" with illegal level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 57582#comment-13057582 ]=20 Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7434: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment=20 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484712/HADOOP-7434 against trunk revision 1140442. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modi= fied tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this= patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed t= o verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of java= c compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.= 3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number= of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compi= le. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/687//tes= tReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/687= //artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/687//c= onsole This message is automatically generated. > there is no error message displayed while using the command "daemonlog -s= etlevel" with illegal level > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7434 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7434 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: =E4=B8=A5=E9=87=91=E5=8F=8C > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7434 > > > While using the command with inexistent "level" like "nomsg", there is no= error message displayed,and the level "DEBUG" is set by default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16853-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 04:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24B4969B3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24189 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 04:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22296 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 04:38:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22239 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 04:37:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:37:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:37:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B1243A8D9 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:37:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1620802473.4453.1309408648457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <276265505.4104.1309389208496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7433) Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057611#comment-13057611 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7433: ------------------------------------- Where does $DIST_LIB_DIR/$BUILD_PLATFORM get created? testing? ant -Dbundle.snappy=true compile-native tar blows up for me w this patch. > Snappy SO file/links are copied to the wrong directory > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7433 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7433.patch > > > The SO file/links are copied into lib/native/, they should be copied to lib/native/$OS_ARCH -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16854-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 06:21:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CA6463A8 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11584 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 06:21:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11341 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 06:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11311 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 06:20:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:20:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:20:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D9643A8D5 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:20:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1612498209.4599.1309414828540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057640#comment-13057640 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7429: ---------------------------------------- +1, the patch looks good to me. > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16855-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41F43630A for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75898 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75543 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75325 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D574843AF7B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942287280.4631.1309418788871.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-310) Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057645#comment-13057645 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-310: ------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) > Additional constructor requested in BytesWritable > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: p sutter > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-0.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-1.patch, bytes-writable-zero-copy-interface-2.patch > > > It would be grand if BytesWritable.java had an additional constructor as below. This allows me to use the BytesWritable class without doing a buffer copy, since we have a less-than-fully-utilized byte array holding our key. > Thanks! > > /** > * Create a BytesWritable using the byte array as the initial value. > * @param bytes This array becomes the backing storage for the object. > */ > public BytesWritable(byte[] bytes, int size) { > this.bytes = bytes; > this.size = size; > } > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16856-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1174631B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76226 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75861 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75353 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940B943AFD2 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <305905078.4684.1309418791603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057646#comment-13057646 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7206: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Attachments: HADOOP-7206-002.patch, HADOOP-7206.patch, HADOOP-7206new-b.patch, HADOOP-7206new-c.patch, HADOOP-7206new.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew-b.patch, HADOOP-7206revertplusnew.patch, v2-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v3-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v4-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt, v5-HADOOP-7206-snappy-codec-using-snappy-java.txt > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16857-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FA016339 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76508 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76132 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75355 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6DD43AFD4 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <734187603.4686.1309418791698.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057647#comment-13057647 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) Minor update to HADOOP-7429. eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1141415 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/IOUtils.java > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16858-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9686340 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76699 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76482 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75354 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA13D43AFD7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <679494199.4689.1309418791824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113408089.3186.1307985891583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7385) Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057648#comment-13057648 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7385: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) > Remove StringUtils.stringifyException(ie) in logger functions > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7385 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7385-1.patch > > > Apache logger api has an overloaded function which can take the message and exception. I am proposing to clean the logging code with this api. > ie.: > Change the code from LOG.warn(msg, StringUtils.stringifyException(exception)); to LOG.warn(msg, exception); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16859-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FF136356 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77012 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76536 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75616 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:26:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179FD43AFDF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <512872261.4694.1309418792093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057649#comment-13057649 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16860-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 07:27:16 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F16A636A for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77392 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77298 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77274 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 07:27:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:27:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4040743AFE4 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:26:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <359763028.4698.1309418792259.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <680679068.21358.1308591287861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7407) Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057650#comment-13057650 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7407: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #668 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/668/]) > Snappy integration breaks HDFS build. > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7407 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7407.patch > > > The common/ivy/hadoop-common-template.xml submitted with 7206 has a typo which breaks anything that depends on the hadoop-common maven package. > Instead of java-snappy, you should have snappy-java > [ivy:resolve] downloading https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-common/0.23.0-SNAPSHOT/hadoop-common-0.23.0-20110620.163810-177.jar ... > [ivy:resolve] ....................... > [ivy:resolve] .................................. > [ivy:resolve] ........................................... > [ivy:resolve] ............................................................... > [ivy:resolve] ................................................ (1631kB) > [ivy:resolve] .. (0kB) > [ivy:resolve] [SUCCESSFUL ] org.apache.hadoop#hadoop-common;0.23.0-SNAPSHOT!hadoop-common.jar (8441ms) > [ivy:resolve] > [ivy:resolve] :: problems summary :: > [ivy:resolve] :::: WARNINGS > [ivy:resolve] module not found: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2 > [ivy:resolve] ==== apache-snapshot: tried > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] ==== maven2: tried > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.pom > [ivy:resolve] -- artifact org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2!java-snappy.jar: > [ivy:resolve] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/xerial/snappy/java-snappy/1.0.3-rc2/java-snappy-1.0.3-rc2.jar > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] :: org.xerial.snappy#java-snappy;1.0.3-rc2: not found > [ivy:resolve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: > [ivy:resolve] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16861-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 09:11:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CED86572 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24543 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 09:11:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24036 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 09:10:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24021 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 09:10:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:10:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:10:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E2743BB2C for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:10:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1394372660.4935.1309425028471.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057704#comment-13057704 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven #44 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-maven/44/]) Minor update to HADOOP-7429. eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1141415 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/IOUtils.java > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16862-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 09:33:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 133EF6F26 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54924 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 09:33:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54667 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 09:32:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54629 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 09:32:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:32:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:32:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926FC43BC6A for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:32:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <694017055.4990.1309426348596.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <28994504.166561290042553993.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7040) DiskChecker:mkdirsWithExistsCheck swallows FileNotFoundException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-7040. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) 0.20.203.1 This was already fixed in 0.20.203. > DiskChecker:mkdirsWithExistsCheck swallows FileNotFoundException. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7040 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7040 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: 4132253-3.patch > > > As a result, DataNode.checkDir will miss the exception (it catches DiskErrorException, not FileNotFoundException), and fail instead of ignoring the non-existent directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16863-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 11:14:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E71F623B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29479 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 11:14:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29312 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29298 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 11:14:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11C43C98F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:14:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1126969463.5175.1309432468386.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403145852.745.1309238057130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7429) Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057756#comment-13057756 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7429: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #733 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/733/]) Minor update to HADOOP-7429. eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1141415 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/IOUtils.java > Add another IOUtils#copyBytes method > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7429 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7429 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7429-1.patch, hadoop-7429-2.patch > > > Common side of HDFS-2110, adds a new IOUtils copy bytes method and cleanup. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16864-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 15:19:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7D0B6BBF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73312 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 15:19:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73119 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 15:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73092 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 15:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EE543CC48 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <28110088.5806.1309447168667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057877#comment-13057877 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7432: --------------------------------------------- Why did line 130 of RawLocalFileSystem.java change from "%04o" to "%05o"? > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16865-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 16:23:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 771CF69B7 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30974 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 16:23:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30905 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 16:23:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30894 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 16:23:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B11343CAC8 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:23:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sherry Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1962569391.5964.1309451008501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057914#comment-13057914 ] Sherry Chen commented on HADOOP-7432: ------------------------------------- Copied from HADOOP:7110. Seems trunk has "%05o" but 0.20-security has "%04o". > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16866-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:14:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F13B96C3D for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31761 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:14:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31676 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:14:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31648 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:14:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:14:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:14:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0CC43CFBF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <96820296.6043.1309454068517.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057936#comment-13057936 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7432: --------------------------------------------- It looks like the change was made as part of HADOOP-3953. Implement sticky bit for directories in HDFS. (Jakob Homan via szetszwo) There were a lot of other changes too associated with that patch, could you please revert it back to "%04o". It should not make any difference in the actual operation of the chmod command, but it will be more consistent with what is actually supported by 0.20-security. > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16867-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:28:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7650F651D for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50537 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:28:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50063 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49853 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:28:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:28:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:28:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B11543C5F2 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:28:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <943446590.6070.1309454908501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7435) Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7435 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Fix For: 0.23.0 The Hudson pre-commit tests are presently only capable of testing a patch against trunk. It'd be nice if this could be extended to automatically run against the correct branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16868-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:32:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6780762E1 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61739 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:32:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61697 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61689 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:32:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:32:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B3F43C7AA for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:32:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1641995401.6077.1309455148605.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <943446590.6070.1309454908501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7435) Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057941#comment-13057941 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7435: ---------------------------------------- I'm envisioning something like this: # If there's only a single "fix version" set on the relevant JIRA, try to apply the patch/test against that branch. # If there's multiple "fix versions" set on the relevant JIRA, we could have a convention for naming the patch to indicate which branch it should be tested against, e.g. "*-22.patch" for 0.22. # If there's no fix version set, default to testing the patch against trunk. > Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7435 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > The Hudson pre-commit tests are presently only capable of testing a patch against trunk. It'd be nice if this could be extended to automatically run against the correct branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16869-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:36:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE5A66CB6 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67234 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:36:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67163 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67155 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:36:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C5D43C96C for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sherry Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <521219569.6085.1309455388618.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sherry Chen updated HADOOP-7432: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7432_1.patch Agree. Line 130 of RawLocalFileSystem.java reverted back to "%04o". > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch, HADOOP-7432_1.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16870-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:44:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 873736EB3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75927 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:44:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75866 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:44:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75849 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:44:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:44:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:44:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B77443CE05 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1646765376.6122.1309455868502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <215422977.3987.1309387168470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7432) Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057953#comment-13057953 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7432: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12484801/HADOOP-7432_1.patch against trunk revision 1141415. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/688//console This message is automatically generated. > Back-port HADOOP-7110 to 0.20-security > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7432 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7432 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sherry Chen > Assignee: Sherry Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-7432.patch, HADOOP-7432_1.patch > > > HADOOP-7110 implemented chmod in the NativeIO library so we can have good performance (ie not fork) and still not be prone to races. This should fix build failures (and probably task failures too). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16871-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:54:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DF4666FE for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88090 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:54:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87953 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87940 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:54:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:54:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:54:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9160A43C4BA for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:54:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1995294234.6159.1309456468591.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057957#comment-13057957 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7428: ------------------------------------- +1 good catch. > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16872-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 17:56:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FDBB6768 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92376 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:56:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92304 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 17:56:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92296 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 17:56:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F94043C5C2 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1444464438.6167.1309456595519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7428: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks Todd! > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16873-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 18:16:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABB7C67A3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20586 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 18:16:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20531 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 18:16:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20515 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 18:16:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:16:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:16:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF68243C0FE for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:16:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1107081138.6220.1309457788715.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <174265054.44671.1309203587452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7428) IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057964#comment-13057964 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7428: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #669 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/669/]) HADOOP-7428. IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1141638 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Client.java > IPC connection is orphaned with null 'out' member > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7428 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7428 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-7428.txt > > > We had a situation a JT ended up in a state where a certain user could not submit a job, due to an NPE on the following line in {{sendParam}}: > {code} > synchronized (Connection.this.out) { > {code} > Looking at the code, my guess is that an RTE was thrown in setupIOstreams, which only catches IOE. This could leave the connection in a half-setup state which is never cleaned up and also cannot perform IPCs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16874-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 19:20:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38B7060B0 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49587 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:20:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49519 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:20:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49505 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 19:20:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:20:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:20:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC3143D5C3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <585940721.6595.1309461628519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <943446590.6070.1309454908501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7435) Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058008#comment-13058008 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7435: ----------------------------------------- Thanks, Aaron for this great idea. Here are some of my thoughts on this. Having patch file naming convention would allow for some interesting use cases. Though a simple version of this patch naming scheme would be a great addition, here is a full blown implementation I was thinking about. --v.patch (e.g. MAPREDUCE-2569-MR-279-v2.patch) - This naming scheme makes the patch completely stand-alone, allowing for emailing the patch - Sanity of managing multiple patch files simultaneously in dev env - Programmatic detection of which branch to apply - Versioning of patches helps those who are submitting and testing out patches, and prevents hudson/jenkins from applying several versions of the same patch and instead tests only the latest version of the patch. - JIRA attach file pre-commit detects "*.patch" and verifies patch naming convention. Personally, I do not prefer to overload "Fix version/s" since that implies what branches the patch is already committed to, leading to confusion. Additionally, newbie hadoop developers may be able to attach files to issues, but are not allowed to edit issue fields. > Make pre-commit checks run against the correct branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7435 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7435 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > The Hudson pre-commit tests are presently only capable of testing a patch against trunk. It'd be nice if this could be extended to automatically run against the correct branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16875-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 19:43:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76BAD6D0A for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98780 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:43:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98557 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:43:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98540 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 19:43:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:43:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:43:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D92943C5B8 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:43:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7436 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Environment: Java 6 Reporter: Eric Yang Assignee: Eric Yang For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16876-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 19:51:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B839645F for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6866 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:51:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6819 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 19:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6811 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 19:51:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:51:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:51:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671E043C869 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1175756388.6751.1309463488419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058037#comment-13058037 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7436: ------------------------------------- I disagree -- I think what we need is a better plugin system. Contrib like this tends to aggregate broken code that no one wants to maintain (witness hdfsproxy tests that have been failing >1 year) > Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16877-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 20:15:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 879016057 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30575 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 20:15:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30523 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 20:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30515 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 20:15:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:15:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:15:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5548B43C417 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:15:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1709227589.6809.1309464929346.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058051#comment-13058051 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7436: ----------------------------------- Metrics plugin is like a driver software. Linux kernel bundles compatible drivers in the source tarball. This is no different, it is easier to certify a software driver if it is included in the kernel source with test cases. If a broken driver is not fixed, it is easy to remove. The power and responsibilities are in the hand of the Hadoop PMC. If Hadoop community don't make integration easy, then it depends on third party to make the integration happen. The distributed integration approach only drains developers from Hadoop community. This is something I would like to avoid. > Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16878-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 20:19:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD3FF638C for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38981 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 20:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38869 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 20:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38844 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 20:19:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:19:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:19:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475243C7BC for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:19:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1197380690.6824.1309465168539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058054#comment-13058054 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7436: ------------------------------------- The difference is that Linux has a sane maintainer system, where each subtree has someone who is committed to its maintenance. We don't have such a thing. In theory, it's easy to remove broken code, but in practice, when we tried to do this with hdfxproxy, people -1ed its removal and then didn't step up to fix the tests (which are still failing). > Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16879-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 22:21:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 924B6625B for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28243 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 22:21:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28184 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28161 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:21:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:21:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6528043D251 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:21:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1553059972.7175.1309472488411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058105#comment-13058105 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7436: ----------------------------------- Chukwa uses a simple mechanism, serialize metrics to JSON string, and stream JSON string to external system using Log4J socket appender. Chukwa metrics plugin is in fact generic. Hadoop currently has FileSink plugin to demo how to interface with Metrics 2 framework. It would be useful to have a generic Metrics 2 plugin that can stream metrics to any monitoring system that implements Log4J socket appender server. Hence, this should not generate unmaintained legacy code but a good interface for external monitoring systems. If I rename this plugin as Log4J Socket Metrics plugin, would this be a reasonable plugin to have in Hadoop? > Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-16880-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Jun 30 23:17:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 837086B2E for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94217 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 23:17:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94169 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 23:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94155 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 23:17:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:17:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:17:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ACF43D227 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:17:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1642157739.7288.1309475848421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1554218243.6744.1309463010445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7436) Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058126#comment-13058126 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7436: ------------------------------------- Yea, if it's that generic, I suppose it makes sense. I had figured it was a Chukwa-specific protocol and would have to pull in chukwa as a dependency. > Bundle Chukwa Metrics plugin in Hadoop > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7436 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7436 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Java 6 > Reporter: Eric Yang > Assignee: Eric Yang > > For monitoring hadoop cluster with Chukwa, the current step is to copy chukwa-hadoop-*-client.jar and json-simple to hadoop classpath. (i.e. $HADOOP_HOME/lib or $HADOOP_PREFIX/share/hadoop/lib), and modify the hadoop-metrics.properties to use org.apache.hadoop.chukwa.inputtools.log4j.Log4JMetricsContext for emitting metrics. It is preferred to reduce the number of manual steps that is required to enable chukwa monitored hadoop cluster by moving the plugin code into hadoop code base. It is similar to bundling Ganglia metrics plugin in Hadoop code base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13297-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 04:24:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83828 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 04:24:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 04:24:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 43397 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 04:24:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42779 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 04:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42642 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 04:24:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 04:24:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 04:23:59 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65547433F9 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 04:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 04:23:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <130492952.3925.1298953418411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6835) Support concatenated gzip and bzip2 files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000704#comment-13000704 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6835: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #616 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/616/]) MAPREDUCE-1927. Unit test for HADOOP-6835 (concatenated gzip support). Contributed by Greg Roelofs. > Support concatenated gzip and bzip2 files > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6835 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6835 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Greg Roelofs > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: C6835-9.patch, HADOOP-6835.v3.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.trunk-hadoop-mapreduce.patch, HADOOP-6835.v4.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, HADOOP-6835.v5.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v6.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v7.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v8.trunk-hadoop-common.patch, HADOOP-6835.v9.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, MR-469.v2.yahoo-0.20.2xx-branch.patch, grr-hadoop-common.dif.20100614c, grr-hadoop-mapreduce.dif.20100614c > > > When running MapReduce with concatenated gzip files as input only the first part is read, which is confusing, to say the least. Concatenated gzip is described in http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/manual/gzip.html#Advanced-usage and in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1952.txt. (See original report at http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-Hadoop-and-concatenated-gzip-files-to21383097.html) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13298-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 05:02:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4073 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 05:02:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 05:02:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 60744 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 05:02:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60548 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 05:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60539 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 05:01:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:01:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:01:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41E343CFD for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 05:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 05:01:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1680703382.4025.1298955696931.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6132081.87541295550763969.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7112) Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000719#comment-13000719 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7112: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #513 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/513/]) HADOOP-7112. Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem. > Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7112 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7112 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, filecache > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7112.patch > > > In GenericOptionsParser#getLibJars() any jars that are not local filesystem paths are silently ignored. We should issue a warning for users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13299-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 07:18:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51660 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 07:18:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 60627 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60413 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:17:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60384 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 07:17:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:17:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:17:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7CC43122 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <564937449.4375.1298963857047.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <626842700.2525.1298091098484.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7151) Document need for stable hashCode() in WritableComparable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000758#comment-13000758 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7151: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #616 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/616/]) HADOOP-7151. Document need for stable hashCode() in WritableComparable. Contributed by Dmitriy V. Ryaboy. > Document need for stable hashCode() in WritableComparable > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7151 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7151 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Dmitriy V. Ryaboy > Assignee: Dmitriy V. Ryaboy > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7151.patch, HADOOP-7151.patch > > > When a Writable is used as a key, HashPartitioner implicitly assumes that hashCode() will return the same value across different instances of the JVM. This is not a guaranteed behavior in Java, and Object's default hashCode() does not in fact do this, which can lead to subtle bugs. This requirement should be explicitly called out. > In addition the sample MyWritable in the javadoc for WritableComparable does not implement hashCode() and thus has a bug. That should be fixed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13300-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 07:18:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51811 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 07:18:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 60846 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60438 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60387 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 07:17:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:17:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:17:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E097D4311F for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1721139740.4372.1298963856916.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6132081.87541295550763969.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7112) Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000759#comment-13000759 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7112: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #616 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/616/]) HADOOP-7112. Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem. > Issue a warning when GenericOptionsParser libjars are not on local filesystem > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7112 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7112 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf, filecache > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7112.patch > > > In GenericOptionsParser#getLibJars() any jars that are not local filesystem paths are silently ignored. We should issue a warning for users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13301-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 07:18:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51870 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 07:18:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 61074 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60982 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60417 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 07:18:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:18:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:17:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A37E43128 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1419027717.4381.1298963857235.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1803853433.10528.1298458838799.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7153) MapWritable violates contract of Map interface for equals() and hashCode() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000757#comment-13000757 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7153: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #616 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/616/]) HADOOP-7153. MapWritable violates contract of Map interface for equals() and hashCode(). Contributed by Nicholas Telford. > MapWritable violates contract of Map interface for equals() and hashCode() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7153 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: 7153-mapwritable-equality-test.diff, 7153-mapwritable-equality.combined.diff, 7153-mapwritable-equality.diff > > > o.a.h.io.MapWritable implements the java.util.Map interface, however it does not define an implementation of the equals() or hashCode() methods; instead the default implementations in java.lang.Object are used. > This violates the contract of the Map interface which defines different behaviour for equals() and hashCode() than Object does. More information here: http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Map.html#equals(java.lang.Object) > The practical consequence is that MapWritables containing equal entries cannot be compared properly. We were bitten by this when trying to write an MRUnit test for a Mapper that outputs MapWritables; the MRUnit driver cannot test the equality of the expected and actual MapWritable objects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13302-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 17:16:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1088 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 17:16:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 17:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 69410 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 17:16:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68658 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 17:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68624 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 17:16:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:16:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:15:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAC949F32 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:15:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "hg (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2031635857.5461.1298999736974.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5980) LD_LIBRARY_PATH not passed to tasks spawned off by LinuxTaskController MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000969#comment-13000969 ] hg commented on HADOOP-5980: ---------------------------- Hello, I tried applying hadoop-5980-v20.patch to hadoop-0.20.2 and I got the following error: patching file src/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/LinuxTaskController.java Hunk #1 FAILED at 24. Hunk #2 FAILED at 125. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/LinuxTaskController.java.rej v20.patch seems to end abruptly at line 38. What should I do? Best Regards, H > LD_LIBRARY_PATH not passed to tasks spawned off by LinuxTaskController > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5980 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5980 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Assignee: Sreekanth Ramakrishnan > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5980-1.patch, HADOOP-5980-2.patch, HADOOP-5980-3.patch, hadoop-5980-v20.patch > > > Currently, task spawned off by {{LinuxTaskController}} don't get LD_LIBRARY_PATH in their environment. The tasks should get same LD_LIBRARY_PATH value as when spawned off by {{DefaultTaskController}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13303-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 22:52:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51276 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 97133 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97075 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97063 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:52:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:52:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4424A420 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:51:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7159 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Reporter: Scott Chen Assignee: Scott Chen Priority: Trivial This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13304-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 22:53:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51804 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 683 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 631 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 618 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:53:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:53:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0486A4A516 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:53:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <248993550.6356.1299020017015.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Chen updated HADOOP-7159: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7159.txt > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13305-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 01 22:54:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51860 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 930 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 704 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 614 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:53:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:53:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:53:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E644A513 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:53:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <435214794.6354.1299020016950.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Chen updated HADOOP-7159: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13306-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 08:40:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41522 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 08:40:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 08:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 23438 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 08:40:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23215 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 08:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23202 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 08:39:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:39:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:39:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066624BDC2 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:39:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <43301795.7467.1299055177022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <29584617.273451296248323898.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7123) Hadoop Disk Fail Inplace MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001334#comment-13001334 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7123: -------------------------------------------- Hi Wang Xu, I have some comments regarding HDFS-1362. I will provide my comments on that jira. > Hadoop Disk Fail Inplace > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7123 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7123 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > > This is an umbrella Jira for tracking all the issues and work related for handling disk failures across the Hadoop stack. Today, Hadoop handles disk failures to some extent but not all the issues. This involves understanding both startup and runtime issues related to disk failures in the Hadoop components. > Scope: The initial scope of work will only be for DataNode and TaskTracker related disk failure issues. > Methodology: Injecting disk failures in SCSI layer at various runtime points of Hadoop and observing Hadoop's behavior for improvement. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13307-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 16:03:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76701 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 16:03:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 16:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32847 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 16:03:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32347 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 16:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32307 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 16:02:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:02:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:02:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8651D4BD31 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <169869926.8025.1299081757546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6541) An Interactive Hadoop FS shell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6541: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > An Interactive Hadoop FS shell > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: HADOOP-6541.2.patch, HADOOP-6541.3.patch, HADOOP-6541.4.patch, HADOOP-6541.patch > > > A shell that allows the user to execute multiple filesystem operations in a single JVM instance at a prompt. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13308-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 17:12:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15815 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 17:12:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 17:12:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 90291 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:12:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89947 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89932 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 17:12:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:12:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:11:59 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F864C96C for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2067905911.8217.1299085899606.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <31897278.92301295561324063.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7114) FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7114: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 I've just committed this. Thanks Todd! > FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7114.txt > > > Most of the FsShell commands catch exceptions and then just print out an error like "foo: " + e.getLocalizedMessage(). This is fine when the exception is "user-facing" (eg permissions errors) but in the case of a user hitting a bug you get a useless error message with no stack trace. For example, something "chmod: null" in the case of a NullPointerException bug. > It would help debug these cases for users and developers if we also logged the exception with full trace at DEBUG level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13309-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 17:14:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16634 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 17:14:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 17:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 93928 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:14:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93845 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93837 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 17:14:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:13:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE714CA69 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:13:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <872956917.8227.1299086017115.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6974) Configurable header buffer size for Hadoop HTTP server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6974: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Paul, unfortunately this no longer applies. Can you regenerate the patch and I'll commit it. > Configurable header buffer size for Hadoop HTTP server > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6974 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6974 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Paul Butler > Assignee: Paul Butler > Attachments: HADOOP-6974.3.patch, HADOOP-6974.4.patch, hadoop-6974.2.patch, hadoop-6974.patch > > > This patch adds a configurable parameter dfs.http.header.buffer.size to Hadoop which allows the buffer size to be configured from the xml configuration. > This fixes an issue that came up in an environment where the Hadoop servers share a domain with other web applications that use domain cookies. The large cookies overwhelmed Jetty's buffer which caused it to return a 413 error. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13310-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 17:26:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54034 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 17:26:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 17:26:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 33283 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33011 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 17:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32986 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 17:25:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:25:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:25:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5644CF41 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:25:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1449256476.8252.1299086737042.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001500#comment-13001500 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7098: ----------------------------------- +1 The lack of a HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS definition looks like an oversight (these variables were introduced in HADOOP-2551). HADOOP_TASKTRACKER_OPTS is already honoured by bin/mapred, so no changes are needed there. Bernd, have you tested this manually? There's currently no easy way to write an automated test for this change. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Attachments: hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13311-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 18:04:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85745 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 18:04:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 18:04:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 92030 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 18:04:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91782 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 18:04:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91765 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 18:03:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:03:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:03:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E986C4CA0D for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:03:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2069671519.8286.1299089016952.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6754) DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6754: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks Aaron! > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6754 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: CompressionBug.java, HADOOP-6754.2.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch > > > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() creates a new Compressor instance in each OutputStream. Even if the OutputStream is closed, this leaks memory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13312-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 18:26:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63779 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 18:26:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 18:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 28659 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 18:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28063 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 18:26:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27755 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 18:26:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:26:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:20:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96A94CF7C for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:20:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <347646534.8325.1299090036952.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <16141091.88171289847975276.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7035) Document incompatible API changes between releases MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7035: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Assignee: Tom White > Document incompatible API changes between releases > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7035 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7035 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: jdiff-with-previous-release.sh, jdiff-with-previous-release.sh > > > We can use JDiff to generate a list of incompatible changes for each release. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?focusedCommentId=12860017&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12860017 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13313-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 20:16:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20192 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 20:16:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 20:16:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 22168 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:16:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20853 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:16:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20598 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 20:16:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:16:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:36:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C1E4C063 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:36:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <55923473.8590.1299094597601.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6342) Create a script to squash a common, hdfs, and mapreduce tarball into a single hadoop tarball MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6342: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) We can close this now as it is subsumed by HADOOP-6846 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?focusedCommentId=13001571&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13001571). > Create a script to squash a common, hdfs, and mapreduce tarball into a single hadoop tarball > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6342.2.patch, HADOOP-6342.patch, h-6342.patch, tar-munge, tar-munge > > > It would be convenient for the transition if we had a script to take a set of common, hdfs, and mapreduce tarballs and merge them into a single tarball. This is intended just to help users who don't want to transition to split projects for deployment immediately. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13314-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 20:22:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41153 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 20:21:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 20:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 73214 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73173 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11383 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 19:34:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <132961198.8577.1299094476903.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6846: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13315-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 20:23:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46988 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 20:23:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 20:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 88723 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88693 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88685 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 20:22:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:22:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:22:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC19A4C16F for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:22:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <276487681.8733.1299097356963.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10697353.42141289538553594.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7030) new topology mapping implementations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7030: ------------------------------ Assignee: Patrick Angeles Status: Open (was: Patch Available) This looks like a useful addition. Here are my comments on the patch: * Could you combine the two types of file, so that if there are three columns the first two are interpreted as a range, otherwise use the first as a single host. Or just support CIDR notation? * Have you thought about InetAddress to avoid implementing IP address parsing logic? http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release08/javadoc/com/google/common/net/InetAddresses.html might be useful (there was talk of introducing Guava recently). * RefreshableDNSToSwitchMapping isn't hooked up yet, so perhaps it should go in a follow on JIRA. * The name "TableMapping" is a bit general. How about "FileBasedMapping", or similar? * The configuration keys should go in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic. * Primes are not needed in hashCode implementations. For Ip4 Arrays.hashCode(value) is sufficient. * The tests swallow exceptions - there should at least be a comment saying that this is expected. Also, fail() with a message is preferable to assertTrue(false). * The tests should be JUnit 4 style. > new topology mapping implementations > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7030 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2, 0.20.1 > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-7030-2.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, topology.patch > > > The default ScriptBasedMapping implementation of DNSToSwitchMapping for determining cluster topology has some drawbacks. Principally, it forks to an OS-specific script. > This issue proposes two new Java implementations of DNSToSwitchMapping. TableMapping reads a two column text file that maps an IP or hostname to a rack ID. Ip4RangeMapping reads a three column text file where each line represents a start and end IP range plus a rack ID. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13316-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 20:40:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17013 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 20:40:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 20:40:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 55290 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:40:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55221 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:40:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55092 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 20:40:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:40:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:40:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2359E4C862 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:40:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bernd Fondermann (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <543821882.8797.1299098437141.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001612#comment-13001612 ] Bernd Fondermann commented on HADOOP-7098: ------------------------------------------ I did test this manually indeed. The patch is in active use in my env. There are things like http://code.google.com/p/jbash/ which might help setting up a test, but just for this small improvement it seem like overkill. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Attachments: hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13317-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 20:42:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17879 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 20:42:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 20:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 61604 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61476 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 20:42:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61458 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 20:42:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:42:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:42:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380A04C9F9 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1610427056.8810.1299098557226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10330397.93631295565704195.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7115) Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001616#comment-13001616 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7115: ------------------------------------- Hey Devaraj. Any news on this patch for trunk? I need to fix HADOOP-7156 which is likely to conflict with this code. > Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7115 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Devaraj Das > > As discussed in HADOOP-6978, a cache helps a lot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13318-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 21:41:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15077 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 21:41:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 21:41:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 44476 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 21:40:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44415 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 21:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44268 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 21:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:40:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2040A41818 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:40:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1914981294.9078.1299102037128.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001678#comment-13001678 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7098: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12468028/hadoop-7098.patch against trunk revision 1076314. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/299//console This message is automatically generated. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Attachments: hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13319-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 21:52:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60800 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 21:52:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 21:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 75711 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 21:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75651 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 21:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75564 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 21:52:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:52:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48C94C0BF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:52:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <327620873.9124.1299102756932.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7156.txt Here's a heinous workaround for this issue: When initializing the native library, we check for the problematic nss module - if it's on the system, we're likely to run into this issue, so it adds a lock around the getpwuid_r calls. Do people think this hack is the right approach? My other thought was to add a new boolean config flag like hadoop.nativeio.workaround.hadoop7156 or some nonsense like that, and if that flag is set, add the monitor lock. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13320-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 22:03:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86867 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 22:03:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 22:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7539 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 22:03:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7495 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 22:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7487 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 22:03:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:03:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:02:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BDD4C6AA for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:02:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1843437377.9178.1299103357093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001702#comment-13001702 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- Another possibility is to look in /etc/redhat-release and match the contents against known-buggy releases. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13321-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 22:59:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63204 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 22:59:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 22:59:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 70908 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 22:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70880 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 22:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70872 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 22:59:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:59:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:59:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A4E4C08D for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:59:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <312971684.9375.1299106777818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13322-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 02 23:01:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76111 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 23:01:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 23:01:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 85357 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 23:01:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85282 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 23:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85274 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 23:01:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:01:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:01:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ACB4C199 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:01:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1648686366.9393.1299106897228.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13323-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 01:55:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61866 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 01:55:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 01:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17922 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 01:55:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17889 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 01:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17880 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 01:55:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 01:55:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1414C6CD for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1904300350.9852.1299117337189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001811#comment-13001811 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------------------ Going through the doc again (I'll get to the patch later): * I'm still a little concerned that the deployment document talks about things that are outside the scope of this JIRA. Even worse, it mentions things that Apache cannot distribute (the LZO code). This should really get sanitized for Hadoop. * is include/hdfs.h really the proper location or should it be include/hadoop/hdfs.h? > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.100 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13324-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 11:14:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53175 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 11:14:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33325 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33218 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33195 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:14:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:14:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A5A4D991 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:14:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1935772995.10660.1299150877093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6754) DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001958#comment-13001958 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6754: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #619 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/619/]) HADOOP-6754. DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory. Contributed by Aaron Kimball. > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6754 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: CompressionBug.java, HADOOP-6754.2.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch > > > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() creates a new Compressor instance in each OutputStream. Even if the OutputStream is closed, this leaks memory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13325-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 11:14:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53188 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 11:14:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33479 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33227 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33186 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 11:14:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:14:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:14:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E654D98D for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:14:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <464061047.10656.1299150876925.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <31897278.92301295561324063.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7114) FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001959#comment-13001959 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7114: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #619 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/619/]) HADOOP-7114. FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level. Contributed by todd. > FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7114.txt > > > Most of the FsShell commands catch exceptions and then just print out an error like "foo: " + e.getLocalizedMessage(). This is fine when the exception is "user-facing" (eg permissions errors) but in the case of a user hitting a bug you get a useless error message with no stack trace. For example, something "chmod: null" in the case of a NullPointerException bug. > It would help debug these cases for users and developers if we also logged the exception with full trace at DEBUG level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13326-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 12:15:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47291 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 12:15:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 12:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 92665 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 12:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92615 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 12:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92607 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 12:15:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:15:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:15:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73244DAF3 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1772985665.10707.1299154537877.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10330397.93631295565704195.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7115) Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-7115: -------------------------------- Attachment: h-7115.1.patch This patch is a straight port from the 20.100 security branch to trunk for the corresponding commit in the security branch. I will also raise a MR jira to address the MR side of the changes. > Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7115 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Attachments: h-7115.1.patch > > > As discussed in HADOOP-6978, a cache helps a lot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13327-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:17:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54630 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:17:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:17:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 73407 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:17:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73356 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:17:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73346 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:17:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:17:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:16:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048B14E553 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:16:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <635282839.11077.1299168997014.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10697353.42141289538553594.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7030) new topology mapping implementations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002039#comment-13002039 ] Patrick Angeles commented on HADOOP-7030: ----------------------------------------- Hey Tom, Thanks for the review. Here are some responses: Could you combine the two types of file, so that if there are three columns the first two are interpreted as a range, otherwise use the first as a single host. Or just support CIDR notation? - I'd prefer to keep them separate as the first two columns have completely different meanings when using one style (table lookup) over the other (IP-range). Have you thought about InetAddress to avoid implementing IP address parsing logic? http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/tags/release08/javadoc/com/google/common/net/InetAddresses.html might be useful (there was talk of introducing Guava recently). - I have not. Will look into this, although I'd rather keep this patch lightweight and not require the addition of another jar. RefreshableDNSToSwitchMapping isn't hooked up yet, so perhaps it should go in a follow on JIRA. - Yes, that is the intent. Those JIRAs would go into MAPREDUCE and HDFS. The name "TableMapping" is a bit general. How about "FileBasedMapping", or similar? - I'm willing to listen to suggestions, however I think FileBasedMapping is even more vague :) The configuration keys should go in CommonConfigurationKeysPublic. - Since this is a pluggable interface, I should not have to modify existing core code. That's better WRT separation of concerns and componentization. I'm willing to take your suggestion if the general consensus is that I should :) Primes are not needed in hashCode implementations. For Ip4 Arrays.hashCode(value) is sufficient. - Ok. The tests swallow exceptions - there should at least be a comment saying that this is expected. Also, fail() with a message is preferable to assertTrue(false). - Ok. The tests should be JUnit 4 style. - Ok. > new topology mapping implementations > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7030 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-7030-2.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, topology.patch > > > The default ScriptBasedMapping implementation of DNSToSwitchMapping for determining cluster topology has some drawbacks. Principally, it forks to an OS-specific script. > This issue proposes two new Java implementations of DNSToSwitchMapping. TableMapping reads a two column text file that maps an IP or hostname to a rack ID. Ip4RangeMapping reads a three column text file where each line represents a start and end IP range plus a rack ID. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13328-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:28:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95593 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:28:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 6828 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:28:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6793 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:28:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6779 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:28:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:27:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A34EA20 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:27:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <609138159.11111.1299169657255.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002046#comment-13002046 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ Again, we're patching around a particular bug in a particular OS, just as we did in HADOOP-7115. This trend is very disturbing. If we really want to go down this road, then yes, this should be compile time. But for now, I'd rather just advertise "RHEL 6.0 is broken; don't use it" just like we do for JREs. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13329-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:41:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44729 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:41:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:41:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 48538 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:41:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48480 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48472 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:41:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:41:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:41:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0B04EF3C for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:41:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <275843995.11153.1299170496897.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002056#comment-13002056 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7157: ------------------------------------------ Why are they being reinstalled and/or in need of configuration updates? Is something being updated just to be updated or is there a purpose? > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13330-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 16:56:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98295 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:56:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:56:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 99252 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:56:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99212 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:56:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99204 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:56:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:56:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:56:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2594E670 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Meyarivan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7160 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: native, security Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: T Meyarivan trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c """ int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { struct group * grp = NULL; size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); if (currBufferSize < 1024) { currBufferSize = 1024; } *grpBuf = NULL; char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if (!buf) { return ENOMEM; } int error; for (;;) { error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, buf + sizeof(struct group), currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); if(error != ERANGE) { break; } free(buf); currBufferSize *= 2; buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if(!buf) { return ENOMEM; } ... """ For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13331-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 17:02:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13884 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 17:02:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 17:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 15575 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15543 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15535 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 17:02:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:02:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:01:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D21B4E8A0 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:01:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Meyarivan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1636729989.11220.1299171697574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] T Meyarivan updated HADOOP-7160: -------------------------------- Description: {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { struct group * grp = NULL; size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); if (currBufferSize < 1024) { currBufferSize = 1024; } *grpBuf = NULL; char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if (!buf) { return ENOMEM; } int error; for (;;) { error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, buf + sizeof(struct group), currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); if(error != ERANGE) { break; } free(buf); currBufferSize *= 2; buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if(!buf) { return ENOMEM; } ... {code} For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter -- was: trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c """ int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { struct group * grp = NULL; size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); if (currBufferSize < 1024) { currBufferSize = 1024; } *grpBuf = NULL; char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if (!buf) { return ENOMEM; } int error; for (;;) { error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, buf + sizeof(struct group), currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); if(error != ERANGE) { break; } free(buf); currBufferSize *= 2; buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); if(!buf) { return ENOMEM; } ... """ For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter -- > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13332-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 17:10:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53966 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 17:10:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 17:10:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 38560 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:10:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38503 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:10:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38492 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 17:10:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:10:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:09:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099A94ED14 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:09:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <900494991.11255.1299172177035.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002077#comment-13002077 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------------ What happens if you increase the nscd buffer size? > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13333-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 17:23:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82978 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 17:23:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 17:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 80858 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:23:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80815 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 17:23:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80798 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 17:22:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:22:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:22:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA55E4E42A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:22:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Meyarivan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1972960463.11311.1299172956890.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002085#comment-13002085 ] T Meyarivan commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------- If the query is successful, nscd caches it for time X - once nscd caches the query, there is little or no (extra) load on remote servers till it expires -- > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13334-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 19:20:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76700 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 19:20:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 19:20:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 66542 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 19:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66502 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 19:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66462 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 19:20:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:20:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:20:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271B64E490 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:20:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <197974725.11635.1299180037156.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7161) Remove unnecessary oro dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove unnecessary oro dependency --------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7161 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Best I can tell we never use the "oro" dependency, but it's been in ivy.xml forever. Does anyone know any reason we might need it? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13335-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 19:28:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6634 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 98441 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98396 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98388 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:28:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:28:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0548B4EA1A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <516483867.11672.1299180517017.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <197974725.11635.1299180037156.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7161) Remove unnecessary oro dependency MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002157#comment-13002157 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7161: --------------------------------- oro is a transitive dependency from commons-net. Feel free to remove it from ivy.xml though, as it'll get pulled in anyway :) > Remove unnecessary oro dependency > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7161 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7161 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > > Best I can tell we never use the "oro" dependency, but it's been in ivy.xml forever. Does anyone know any reason we might need it? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13336-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 20:08:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60034 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 20:08:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 20:08:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13916 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 20:08:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13883 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 20:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13837 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 20:08:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:08:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:07:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B1D4EB57 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:07:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Meyarivan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1426823441.11827.1299182857494.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002177#comment-13002177 ] T Meyarivan commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------- nscd doesn't cache the results until the query "succeeds" => it takes N queries (the result is discarded N-1 times) Cold cache + large job is likely to trigger a flood of queries -- > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13337-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 20:23:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95034 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 20:23:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 20:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 64216 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 20:23:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64176 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 20:23:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64168 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 20:23:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:23:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:23:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C6B4E24A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:23:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <103050926.11866.1299183816920.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002186#comment-13002186 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------------ Even with tuning of negative-time-to-live, positive-time-to-live, etc? > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13338-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 21:39:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59766 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 87554 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87511 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87420 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 21:39:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:39:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:38:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606234E458 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:38:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <943526599.12099.1299188317389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10697353.42141289538553594.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7030) new topology mapping implementations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002252#comment-13002252 ] Patrick Angeles commented on HADOOP-7030: ----------------------------------------- - Could you combine the two types of file, so that if there are three columns the first two are interpreted as a range, otherwise use the first as a single host. Or just support CIDR notation? - I'd prefer to keep them separate as the first two columns have completely different meanings when using one style (table lookup) over the other (IP-range). BTW, I don't think CIDR is appropriate here. For the table-based mapping, you can get either hosts or IPs, possibly depending on who (JT or NN) is requesting the rack ID. The docs are unclear here. In either case, servers within a rack rarely fall in units that are powers of two. > new topology mapping implementations > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7030 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7030 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-7030-2.patch, HADOOP-7030.patch, topology.patch > > > The default ScriptBasedMapping implementation of DNSToSwitchMapping for determining cluster topology has some drawbacks. Principally, it forks to an OS-specific script. > This issue proposes two new Java implementations of DNSToSwitchMapping. TableMapping reads a two column text file that maps an IP or hostname to a rack ID. Ip4RangeMapping reads a three column text file where each line represents a start and end IP range plus a rack ID. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13339-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 21:45:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61880 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 21:45:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 21:45:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 3115 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:45:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3064 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 21:45:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3056 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 21:45:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:45:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:44:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB03A4E779 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:44:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1541538317.12153.1299188676959.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002257#comment-13002257 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------- so the sysconf result is returning a too-small value as well, I guess? Rather than making this configurable, it seems we could bump it to something like 64KB - I can't imagine the extra memory usage would harm anyone. How big a buffer do you need for your groups? > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13340-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 03 23:13:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58490 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 23:13:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 23:13:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 41739 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 23:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41707 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 23:13:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41699 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 23:13:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:13:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:12:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5344E953 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:12:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <388132984.12381.1299193956929.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <24749852.181491295940943442.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7116) raise contrib junit test jvm memory size to 512mb MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002308#comment-13002308 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7116: ----------------------------------- Looks like this was committed to the 0.20 branch. Can it be closed? > raise contrib junit test jvm memory size to 512mb > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7116 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7116 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: h-7116.patch > > > The streaming tests are failing with out of memory. Raise the memory limit to 512mb. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13341-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:08:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50454 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:08:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 97332 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:08:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97287 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:08:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97261 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:07:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:07:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:07:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE374FC96 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:07:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <479929516.13031.1299215256903.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6370) Contrib project ivy dependencies are not included in binary target MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6370: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Unfortunately this has fallen out of date. Aaron, would you like to regenerate it? Thanks. > Contrib project ivy dependencies are not included in binary target > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6370 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6370 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Priority: Critical > Attachments: HADOOP-6370.2.patch, HADOOP-6370.patch > > > Only Hadoop's own library dependencies are promoted to ${build.dir}/lib; any libraries required by contribs are not redistributed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13342-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:12:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51148 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:12:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:12:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8937 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:12:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8902 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:12:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8882 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:12:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:12:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:11:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FEB4FD7F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:11:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <541221143.13041.1299215496889.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1213190269.14005.1297638718045.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7139) Allow appending to existing SequenceFiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7139: ------------------------------ Assignee: Mac Yang Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Allow appending to existing SequenceFiles > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Stephen Rose > Assignee: Mac Yang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch > > Original Estimate: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 2h > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13343-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:16:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54275 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:16:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:16:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 25962 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:16:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25921 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25808 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:16:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:16:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:16:01 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0B24FE27 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:15:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <671515667.13054.1299215740320.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1213190269.14005.1297638718045.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7139) Allow appending to existing SequenceFiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reassigned HADOOP-7139: --------------------------------- Assignee: Stephen Rose (was: Mac Yang) Sorry, I made a mistake assigning this a moment ago when marking it as open (while Todd's feedback is addressed). > Allow appending to existing SequenceFiles > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7139 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Stephen Rose > Assignee: Stephen Rose > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch, HADOOP-7139.patch > > Original Estimate: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 2h > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13344-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:22:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77301 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:22:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:22:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 40132 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:22:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40045 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:22:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39981 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:22:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:22:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:21:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11A14FF26 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:21:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2068244960.13061.1299216096918.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7098: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7098.patch Good to know. Regenerating patch from top level so Hudson can check it. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Attachments: HADOOP-7098.patch, hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13345-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:34:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25201 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:34:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 79754 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:34:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79723 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:34:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79703 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:34:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:34:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:33:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C844E205 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:33:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <262706744.13075.1299216816917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002457#comment-13002457 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7098: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12472646/HADOOP-7098.patch against trunk revision 1076314. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/300//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/300//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/300//console This message is automatically generated. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Attachments: HADOOP-7098.patch, hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13346-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:37:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51208 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:37:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:37:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 89034 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:37:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88990 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88682 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:37:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:37:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:37:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70944E2D5 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:37:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <53128340.13081.1299217056942.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7098: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks Bernd! > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7098.patch, hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13347-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 05:52:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99874 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 05:52:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 05:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30225 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:52:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30200 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 05:52:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30147 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 05:52:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 05:52:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45F94E691 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:52:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1604211006.13103.1299217956932.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002462#comment-13002462 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7157: -------------------------------------------- That I don't know, Allen. It has been pointed out that recently some machines were re-flashed (again, I have no idea why). During this op. patch packages got missed which cases builds failing for some days. Thus this JIRA. > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13348-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 09:29:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81766 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 09:29:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 09:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 45664 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:29:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45590 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:29:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45543 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 09:29:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:29:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:28:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE194FEB9 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:28:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alexey Diomin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7162) call method without catching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org call method without catching ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7162 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: util Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Alexey Diomin Priority: Minor in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 call method twice: 1. for init variable 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13349-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 09:30:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87219 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 51108 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51081 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51073 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:30:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:30:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F161D4FFA2 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:30:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alexey Diomin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1887282360.13383.1299231036985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7162) call method without catching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Diomin updated HADOOP-7162: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-7162.path > call method without catching > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13350-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 09:30:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87257 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 51341 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51293 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51144 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 09:30:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:30:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:30:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE3B4FF9D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:30:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alexey Diomin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <5109541.13381.1299231036913.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7162) call method without catching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexey Diomin updated HADOOP-7162: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > call method without catching > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13351-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 11:16:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41127 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 11:16:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 11:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 44385 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 11:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44326 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 11:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44318 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 11:16:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:16:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:15:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5B24F70D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:15:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <439760539.13611.1299237336891.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002547#comment-13002547 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7098: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #620 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/620/]) HADOOP-7098. Tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh. Contributed by Bernd Fondermann. > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7098.patch, hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13352-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 14:00:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72578 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 93256 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93213 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93184 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 14:00:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:00:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:59:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7534FE13 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:59:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1287761245.13905.1299247177051.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7131: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7131.patch > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13353-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 15:26:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60459 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 350 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 313 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 300 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 15:26:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:26:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:25:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB69C4F6FD for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:25:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1976619391.14188.1299252336895.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7131: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 15:31:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77195 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 22424 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22395 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22386 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 15:31:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:31:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:30:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253204FA02 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:30:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <571665438.14220.1299252637148.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002667#comment-13002667 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7131: --------------------------------------------- Here the verification results: [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Tests are not required for this changes. that is the reason for -1. > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:13:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31643 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:13:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:13:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 52797 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:13:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52763 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52729 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:13:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:13:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:13:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24444F66A for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:13:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1213426933.14624.1299258816923.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7162) call method without catching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7162: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Alexey Diomin Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > call method without catching > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:17:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40100 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:17:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:17:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 66403 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:17:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66360 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:17:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66352 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:17:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:17:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:17:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECCB4F843 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <919753375.14638.1299259056909.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002724#comment-13002724 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------------ Avoiding multiple round-trips seems like a good idea. If you make it configurable, it would be good to have a way to be able to tell how large the value should be set. The same mechanism can be used to answer Todd's question. > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:19:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48801 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:19:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:19:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 72074 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:19:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72018 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72010 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:19:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:19:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:19:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1B94F913 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:19:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <560934598.14645.1299259177037.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7163) "java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60000 millis timeout" happens a lot MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 "java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 60000 millis timeout" happens a lot --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7163 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7163 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Devaraj Das Fix For: 0.20.100 We don't have retries for the case where the secure SASL connection is getting created from the tasks. There is retry for TCP connections, but once the TCP connection has been set up, communication at the RPC layer (and that includes SASL handshake) happens without retries. So for example, a client's "read" can timeout. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:28:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79077 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:28:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 99177 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:28:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99146 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:28:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99137 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:28:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:27:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A494FCA5 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:27:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2096667661.14656.1299259656883.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE moved HDFS-1609 to HADOOP-7164: ------------------------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: hdfs client) fs Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) (was: 0.20.1) 0.20.1 0.20.2 Key: HADOOP-7164 (was: HDFS-1609) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:29:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79833 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:29:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3625 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3599 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3591 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:29:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:29:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:29:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A104FDD9 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:29:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <339251107.14666.1299259777027.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7164: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change] > tcsh and bash behaves differently for multiple globbing. If the behavior is not standardized, I suggest to keep the current implementation. Marking this as "Incompatible Change". > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:31:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92980 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:31:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 9807 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:31:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9746 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9719 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:31:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:31:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:31:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B2B4FEDE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:31:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912492318.14684.1299259897286.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002731#comment-13002731 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7164: ------------------------------------------------ I also have moved this to Common. > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:37:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25559 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:37:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:37:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 27646 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:37:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27615 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27607 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:37:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:37:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:37:56 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61F14F161 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:37:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1823079031.14696.1299260256873.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7162) call method without catching MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002736#comment-13002736 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7162: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12472654/HDFS-7162.path against trunk revision 1077811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/302//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/302//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/302//console This message is automatically generated. > call method without catching > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 17:44:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27212 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 17:44:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 17:44:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 47244 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:44:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47184 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 17:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47175 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 17:44:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:44:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:43:58 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74E4F37B for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:43:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1173634415.14710.1299260617694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002738#comment-13002738 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7131: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12472667/HADOOP-7131.patch against trunk revision 1077811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/301//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/301//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/301//console This message is automatically generated. > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 21:36:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27359 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 21:36:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 21:36:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 41214 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41188 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41180 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 21:36:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:36:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:36:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C72556E2 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:35:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Meyarivan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1249524610.111.1299274545941.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2042659645.11198.1299171397106.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7160) Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002828#comment-13002828 ] T Meyarivan commented on HADOOP-7160: ------------------------------------- tlipcon@: Not sure about fixed limits. If it is important to avoid another config parameter, how about adjusting the initial buffer size based on the response size -- > Configurable initial buffersize for getGroupDetails() > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7160 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7160 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: T Meyarivan > > {code:title=trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/getGroup.c|borderStyle=solid} > int getGroupDetails(gid_t group, char **grpBuf) { > struct group * grp = NULL; > size_t currBufferSize = sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX); > if (currBufferSize < 1024) { > currBufferSize = 1024; > } > *grpBuf = NULL; > char *buf = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if (!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > int error; > for (;;) { > error = getgrgid_r(group, (struct group*)buf, > buf + sizeof(struct group), > currBufferSize - sizeof(struct group), &grp); > if(error != ERANGE) { > break; > } > free(buf); > currBufferSize *= 2; > buf = malloc(sizeof(char) * currBufferSize); > if(!buf) { > return ENOMEM; > } > ... > {code} > For large groups, this implies at least 2 queries for the group (number of queries = math.ceil(math.log(response_size/1024, 2))) > In the case of a large cluster with central user/group databases (exposed via LDAP etc), this leads to unnecessary load on the central services. This can be alleviated to a large extent by changing the initial buffer size to a configurable parameter > -- -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 21:38:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33301 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 21:38:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 21:38:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 46081 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:38:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46036 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46028 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 21:38:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:38:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:38:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89D655794 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <773739797.118.1299274667949.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7165) listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7165 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7165 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.23.0 listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs. So if a job client uses a FilterFs to talk to NameNode, it does not trigger the bulk location optimization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 21:46:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45163 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 21:46:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 21:46:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 63279 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63255 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63247 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 21:46:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:46:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:46:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2013555AA6 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:45:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1249492750.129.1299275146128.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <773739797.118.1299274667949.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7165) listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-7165: ---------------------------------- Attachment: locatedStatusFilter.patch Here is a straightforward fix. > listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7165 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: locatedStatusFilter.patch > > > listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs. So if a job client uses a FilterFs to talk to NameNode, it does not trigger the bulk location optimization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 21:48:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62278 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 21:48:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 21:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 69405 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:48:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69349 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69335 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 21:48:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:48:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:48:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D609A55B34 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <132607900.131.1299275265873.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7162) FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7162: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: util) fs Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 Summary: FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice (was: call method without catching) > FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 21:50:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78937 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 21:50:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 21:50:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 74500 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:50:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74455 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 21:50:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74445 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 21:50:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:50:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:50:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F8C55C31 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:49:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <803070126.142.1299275386008.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7162) FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7162: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Alexey! > FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 22:05:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19471 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 22:05:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 22:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 16301 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:05:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16268 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:05:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16260 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 22:05:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:05:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:05:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C808552D4 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <887072337.181.1299276286506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <773739797.118.1299274667949.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7165) listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002839#comment-13002839 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7165: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7165 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: locatedStatusFilter.patch > > > listLocatedStatus(path, filter) is not redefined in FilterFs. So if a job client uses a FilterFs to talk to NameNode, it does not trigger the bulk location optimization. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 23:45:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24662 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 23:45:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 23:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 62567 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:45:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62459 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62330 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 23:45:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:45:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:45:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF455D87 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:44:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <492129204.336.1299282285921.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6762) exception while doing RPC I/O closes channel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002871#comment-13002871 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6762: ------------------------------------- Hi Sam, We saw the following deadlock which I think is related to this patch: {noformat} Thread 50994 (IPC Client (47) connection to XXXXXXXXX:8020 from hdfs): State: BLOCKED Blocked count: 7168 Waited count: 7122 Blocked on java.io.DataOutputStream@2e932fec Blocked by 50828 (sendParams-14) Stack: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.sendPing(Client.java:676) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$400(Client.java:210) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection$PingInputStream.handleTimeout(Client.java:340) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection$PingInputStream.read(Client.java:370) java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:237) java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:370) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.receiveResponse(Client.java:781) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:689) Thread 50828 (sendParams-14): State: BLOCKED Blocked count: 54 Waited count: 8313 Blocked on org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection@54aeb3dd Blocked by 50994 (IPC Client (47) connection to XXXXXX:8020 from hdfs) Stack: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.markClosed(Client.java:809) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.access$1200(Client.java:210) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection$3.run(Client.java:745) java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441) java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) {noformat} The issue is that in the patch, we have the following inverted lock orders: sendParam's senderFuture: Connection.out -> Connection (in markClosed) sendPing: Connection -> Connection.out (explicit sync) Have you guys seen this issue? > exception while doing RPC I/O closes channel > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6762 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6762 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: sam rash > Assignee: sam rash > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6762-1.txt, hadoop-6762-10.txt, hadoop-6762-2.txt, hadoop-6762-3.txt, hadoop-6762-4.txt, hadoop-6762-6.txt, hadoop-6762-7.txt, hadoop-6762-8.txt, hadoop-6762-9.txt > > > If a single process creates two unique fileSystems to the same NN using FileSystem.newInstance(), and one of them issues a close(), the leasechecker thread is interrupted. This interrupt races with the rpc namenode.renew() and can cause a ClosedByInterruptException. This closes the underlying channel and the other filesystem, sharing the connection will get errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 04 23:55:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67603 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 23:55:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 23:55:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 80258 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:55:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80145 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 23:55:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80101 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 23:55:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:55:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:55:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E66655FA8 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:54:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "sam rash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1405826610.356.1299282886121.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6762) exception while doing RPC I/O closes channel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002873#comment-13002873 ] sam rash commented on HADOOP-6762: ---------------------------------- I haven't noticed this. In the rev we're running, inside sendParams(), markClosed() is called outside the synchronized(Connection.this.out), so that lock isn't held...? (I'm using the original patch I uploaded before we changed it to a Future--it uses a latch) > exception while doing RPC I/O closes channel > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6762 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6762 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: sam rash > Assignee: sam rash > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6762-1.txt, hadoop-6762-10.txt, hadoop-6762-2.txt, hadoop-6762-3.txt, hadoop-6762-4.txt, hadoop-6762-6.txt, hadoop-6762-7.txt, hadoop-6762-8.txt, hadoop-6762-9.txt > > > If a single process creates two unique fileSystems to the same NN using FileSystem.newInstance(), and one of them issues a close(), the leasechecker thread is interrupted. This interrupt races with the rpc namenode.renew() and can cause a ClosedByInterruptException. This closes the underlying channel and the other filesystem, sharing the connection will get errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:44:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34000 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 76730 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76611 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76602 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CCF55D36 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1822066731.411.1299285826221.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7162) FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002885#comment-13002885 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7162: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #517 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/517/]) > FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:44:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34018 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 76915 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76824 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76620 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A8255D32 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <665775244.407.1299285826072.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <31897278.92301295561324063.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7114) FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002886#comment-13002886 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7114: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #517 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/517/]) > FsShell should dump all exceptions at DEBUG level > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7114 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7114.txt > > > Most of the FsShell commands catch exceptions and then just print out an error like "foo: " + e.getLocalizedMessage(). This is fine when the exception is "user-facing" (eg permissions errors) but in the case of a user hitting a bug you get a useless error message with no stack trace. For example, something "chmod: null" in the case of a NullPointerException bug. > It would help debug these cases for users and developers if we also logged the exception with full trace at DEBUG level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13373-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:44:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34099 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77134 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77109 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77101 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:07 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF13155D2B for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1096868553.401.1299285825844.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2257860.286501294766747197.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7098) tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002887#comment-13002887 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7098: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #517 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/517/]) > tasktracker property not set in conf/hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7098 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Bernd Fondermann > Assignee: Bernd Fondermann > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7098.patch, hadoop-7098.patch > > > For all cluster components, except TaskTracker the OPTS environment variable is set like this in hadoop-env.sh: > export HADOOP__OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote $HADOOP__OPTS" > The provided patch fixes this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 00:44:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34138 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77378 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77326 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77318 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 00:44:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:44:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0B155D3B for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1753147427.415.1299285826582.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6754) DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002884#comment-13002884 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6754: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #517 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/517/]) > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() leaks memory > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6754 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6754 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: CompressionBug.java, HADOOP-6754.2.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch, HADOOP-6754.patch > > > DefaultCodec.createOutputStream() creates a new Compressor instance in each OutputStream. Even if the OutputStream is closed, this leaks memory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 02:27:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59741 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 02:27:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 02:27:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 39166 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 02:27:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38729 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 02:27:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37593 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 02:26:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:26:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:11:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0178B56979 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 02:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 02:10:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <642447675.524.1299291046002.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: arrayprim_v5.patch Re-submitting same patch file in hopes that the auto-tester will run. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 03:01:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63234 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 03:01:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:01:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 7774 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:01:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:01:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6439 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 03:01:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:45:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A6566FD for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 01:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 01:44:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <189532702.505.1299289485878.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002903#comment-13002903 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- Apparently no one out there who implements pam modules knows that getpwuid_r is supposed to be reentrant :) A user saw this same issue with VAS: /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3757c7230f] /lib64/libc.so.6(cfree+0x4b)[0x3757c7276b] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassym_sqlite3FreeX+0xe)[0x2aaaab2bd15e] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4[0x2aaaab2ac9b9] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassym_sqlite3OsClose+0x93)[0x2aaaab2ad6d3] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassym_sqlite3pager_close+0x4d)[0x2aaaab2af1cd] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassym_sqlite3BtreeClose+0x15)[0x2aaaab29a235] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassym_sqlite3_close+0x15b)[0x2aaaab2ab62b] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vassql_deinit+0xdf)[0x2aaaab3158de] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4[0x2aaaab2f3ef9] /opt/quest/lib64/libvas.so.4(vascache_deinit+0x30)[0x2aaaab2f438f] /lib64/libnss_vas3.so.2[0x2aaaab027240] /lib64/libnss_vas3.so.2(_nss_vas3_getXXent_release_tsd+0x10e)[0x2aaaab0284ff] /lib64/libnss_vas3.so.2[0x2aaaab02c3c0] /lib64/libnss_vas3.so.2(_nss_vas3_getpwuid_r+0x36)[0x2aaaab02d242] /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xa5)[0x3757c99515] > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 05 16:15:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80121 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 16:15:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 16:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 99579 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 16:15:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99537 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 16:15:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99525 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 16:15:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:15:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:15:06 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2592569EA for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 16:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 16:14:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2043144497.999.1299341685857.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7162) FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002990#comment-13002990 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7162: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #621 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/621/]) HADOOP-7162. Rmove a duplicated call FileSystem.listStatus(..) in FsShell. Contributed by Alexey Diomin > FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 06 10:52:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30327 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2011 10:52:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2011 10:52:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 11953 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2011 10:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11906 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2011 10:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11891 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2011 10:52:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:52:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:52:08 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D38E58242 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:51:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yanbo Liang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <749954614.1749.1299408706378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6239) Command-line for append MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003128#comment-13003128 ] Yanbo Liang commented on HADOOP-6239: ------------------------------------- Maybe append on a file mostly used by API rather than command-line such as HBase log/transaction files and Facebook Scribe. > Command-line for append > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6239 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6239 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Koji Noguchi > > Once append is implemented in hdfs, it would be nice if users can append files from a command-line. > Either have a separate 'append' command or add '-append' option for 'put' and 'cp' > Like, > {noformat} > % cat mylocalfile | hadoop dfs -put -append - /user/knoguchi/myfile ('-' for stdin) > % hadoop dfs -cp -append myhdfsfile1 myhdfsfile2 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 03:13:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36892 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 03:13:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 03:13:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 2711 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2575 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2542 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 03:13:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:13:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:13:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BA839ACA2 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:12:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1319909919.263.1299467579724.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7131: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 03:15:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38165 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 03:15:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 03:15:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 5773 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5725 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5710 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 03:15:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:15:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:15:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A17D39AD4D for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1694176073.267.1299467699496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003244#comment-13003244 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7131: ------------------------------------- +1 > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 03:17:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43309 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 03:17:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 03:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9696 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:17:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9663 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:17:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9635 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 03:17:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:17:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A13239ADC7 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:17:09 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1499677743.272.1299467829168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7131: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks! > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 03:45:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30956 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 03:45:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 03:45:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 65826 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:45:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65792 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 03:45:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65764 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 03:45:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:45:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFC339A3BF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1352962807.315.1299469499508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7159: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1. Committed to trunk after running related tests. > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 05:56:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68905 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 05:56:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 05:56:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 1331 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 05:56:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 918 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 05:56:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 798 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 05:56:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:56:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE80739AB8B for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:55:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1015038040.391.1299477359906.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003271#comment-13003271 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- bq. But for now, I'd rather just advertise "RHEL 6.0 is broken; don't use it" just like we do for JREs. Unfortunately many of us are not in a position to do this - RHEL 6.0 is a must for us, regardless of some bugs it might have. Same with support for Vintela Authentication Services (VAS) which has a similar bug. Asking users to switch their entire OS or auth system is not an option. I think there are three workable options here from my perspective: 1) Always lock around getpwuid_r. Devaraj is added a cache for this function as part of another JIRA, so it shouldn't be a big performance issue. 2) Add a compile-time macro like LOCK_AROUND_PWUID, which, when set, will add the monitor lock around these calls. 3) Add a runtime Hadoop configuration option like hadoop.workaround.broken.getpwuid, which when enabled adds the lock. Which, if any, of these seem acceptable to you? Since we've found that this isn't RHEL6 specific, but in fact occurs with other broken pieces of software as well, I'm leaning towards option #1 or #3. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 10:31:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47416 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 10:31:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 10:31:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 93484 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 10:31:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93213 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 10:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93196 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 10:31:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:31:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:31:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A548D39AED8 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1199370355.677.1299493859673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003313#comment-13003313 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7164: --------------------------------------------- Fix for this defect is in FsShell.java but the file present in COMMON project. Patch (HDFS-1609-src.patch) need to be updated in COMMON. After applying this patch in Common, tests will pass. > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 10:53:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29845 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 10:53:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 10:53:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 53186 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 10:53:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53137 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 10:53:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53075 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 10:53:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:53:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:53:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D97C39B971 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:52:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1531832144.757.1299495179510.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003321#comment-13003321 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7164: --------------------------------------------- Related Tests are org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSShell.testInvalidPathPatternForCatStatRmr org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSShell.testInvalidPathPatternForStat This both test cases will pass with HDFS-1609-src.patch. This is bacause testCode and sourceCode are vailable in HDFS,COMMON respectively. > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 13:31:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35953 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27215 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27183 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27175 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:31:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:31:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E5839BA70 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <776745505.908.1299504660213.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003352#comment-13003352 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7131: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #623 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/623/]) HADOOP-7131. Exceptions thrown by Text methods should include the causing exception. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G. > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 13:31:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36239 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 13:31:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 27611 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27576 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27568 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 13:31:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:31:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:31:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CDB39BA6E for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:31:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <645894245.906.1299504660155.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003351#comment-13003351 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7159: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #623 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/623/]) HADOOP-7159. RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened. Contributed by Scott Chen. > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 16:54:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11452 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 16:54:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 16:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77809 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 16:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77758 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 16:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77515 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 16:54:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:54:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7667739BCC2 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ravi Prakash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <971108340.1387.1299516839481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5094) Show dead nodes information in dfsadmin -report MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003427#comment-13003427 ] Ravi Prakash commented on HADOOP-5094: -------------------------------------- I'm not sure what the expected behavior is when a node is specified in dfs.exclude and the cluster is started. Maybe this should never be done. But if it IS done. dfsadmin -report shows this Live datanodes: .... .... .... Dead datanodes: report: String index out of range: -1 Is this fine? The output is as expected when the cluster is started without any dfs.exclude entries, and then one added. (it shows it as a dead node with Decommission Status: Decommissioned) So that is good. > Show dead nodes information in dfsadmin -report > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5094 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5094 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.18.2 > Reporter: Jim Huang > Assignee: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: DfsAdminDeadNode_testCases.html, DfsAdminDeadNode_testCases.html, HADOOP-5094.patch, HADOOP-5094.patch, HADOOP-5094.patch > > > As part of operations responsibility to bring back dead nodes, it will be good to have a quick way to obtain a list of dead data nodes. > The current way is to scrape the namenode web UI page and parse that information, but this creates load on the namenode. > In search of a less costly way, I noticed dfsadmin -report only reports data nodes with State: "In Service" and "Decommission in progress" get listed. > Asking for a cheap way to obtain a list of dead nodes. > In addition, can the following requests be reviewed for additional enhancement and changes to dfsadmin -report. > - Consistent formatting output in "Remaining raw bytes:" for the data nodes should have a space between the exact value and the parenthesized value. > Sample: > Total raw bytes: 3842232975360 (3.49 TB) > Remaining raw bytes: 146090593065(136.06 GB) > Used raw bytes: 3240864964620 (2.95 TB) > - Include the running version of Hadoop. > - What is the meaning of "Total effective bytes"? > - Display the hostname instead of the IP address for the data node (toggle option?) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 17:26:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13167 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 52008 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51973 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51964 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:26:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:26:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845AD39BAA9 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:25:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <6233149.1499.1299518759538.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003453#comment-13003453 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ If someone wants to use non-conforming software, that is their problem, not ours. I'd much rather shame a company into fixing it than pretending that everything is a-ok. Yes, I realize that is idealistic. In the case of RHEL 6, it is what? 2 months old? Like any .0, it is going to have growing pains during its first few months that should get fixed by the vendor. As for VAS, I'm not really sure I care. In the case of #1, what is the point of mutexes around a thread-safe function? Why not just call the unsafe one and avoid the extra performance hit on machines that follow POSIX? In the case of #3, I'll be OK with this if we also add a huge warning in the task log telling the user that their system isn't POSIX compliant and to call their vendor to get it fixed. :p > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 18:15:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63048 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 18:15:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 18:15:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 87141 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 18:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87107 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 18:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87099 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 18:15:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:15:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:15:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BCC39BECF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101757560.1642.1299521699543.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003485#comment-13003485 ] Scott Chen commented on HADOOP-7159: ------------------------------------ Thanks for the help, Todd :) > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 18:17:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68165 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 92736 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 18:17:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92662 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 18:17:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92553 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 18:17:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:17:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:17:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F6539BFFD for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <136630983.1656.1299521819824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003487#comment-13003487 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7164: ------------------------------------------ Would someone mind confirming that the error messages actually go to stderr? They cannot go to stdout. > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:34:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45580 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:34:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 85309 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85278 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85270 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F6F39BEF6 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1779764816.1968.1299526439664.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:34:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45716 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 85544 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85503 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85495 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291A139BF0A for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <103292134.1982.1299526440164.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: (was: arrayprim_v5.patch) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:34:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45800 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 85749 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85719 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85710 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBDC39BF1C for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <923722278.1998.1299526440847.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: (was: arrayprim_v5.patch) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:36:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56400 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 91751 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91696 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91682 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:36:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:36:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:36:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4A639B11E for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:36:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1432206626.2043.1299526560321.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: arrayprim_v5.patch One more time, trying to get auto-test to run. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:38:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56855 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:38:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:38:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 97798 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97728 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97711 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:38:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:38:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73EA39B383 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:38:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <189309007.2072.1299526680943.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Release Note: Increments the RPC protocol version in org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server from 4 to 5. Introduces a much more efficient wire format to transmit arrays of primitives. This is done in a way that is 100% backward compatible with previously persisted data, so any stored data will still be readable. However, data written in the new version cannot be read by a process using the old version of protocol. Only RPC uses the new format; file writing protocols for application data are unchanged.. was: Increments the RPC protocol version in org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server from 4 to 5. Introduces a much more efficient wire format to transmit arrays of primitives. This is done in a way that is 100% backward compatible with previously persisted data, so any stored data will still be readable. However, data written in the new version cannot be read by a process using the old version of protocol. Only RPC uses the new format; file writing protocols for application data are unchanged. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:44:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59979 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18114 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18053 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17914 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:44:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:44:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B541539BB93 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 19:43:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <573912296.2117.1299527039739.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003537#comment-13003537 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- include/hdfs.h is the proper location, if hdfs.h is a public api that dependent project (fuse-dfs) can interface. I don't know the right answer, but include/hdfs.h works for now. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.100 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 21:57:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2949 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 21:57:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 21:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 83834 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 21:57:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83781 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 21:57:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83599 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 21:57:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:57:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:57:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9539C87F for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7166 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:11:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58262 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:11:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 26270 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:11:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26246 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:11:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26210 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:11:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:11:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:11:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8624639CE2E for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1640927942.2664.1299535859546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:13:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58948 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 29710 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29676 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29668 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:13:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:13:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:13:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C67839CF06 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:12:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1264348902.2667.1299535979440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch submitted for hudson tests. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:24:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93209 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:24:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:24:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 60818 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60781 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60740 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:24:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:24:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C68039C426 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <389161031.2799.1299536643309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003656#comment-13003656 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------- Is the motivation for this for MapReduce to use DaemonFactory? > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:42:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51521 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:42:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 3291 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3242 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3035 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:42:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F82139CA91 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:44:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51859 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 7412 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7330 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7322 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:44:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:44:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778A039CB24 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:43:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <61713221.2878.1299537839486.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:44:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51903 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 7639 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7603 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7595 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:44:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:44:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:44:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6926F39CB22 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:43:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1501282611.2876.1299537839427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7167.txt > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:49:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88079 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:49:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:49:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 15806 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:49:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15743 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15561 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:49:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:49:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:49:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9789039CC9B for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:48:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1347010045.2884.1299538139617.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7168) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7168 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7168 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 Attachments: mapreduce-2367.txt It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 22:51:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95309 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:51:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 22:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 19689 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:51:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19649 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 22:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19641 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 22:51:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:51:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:51:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6CD39CDAF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:50:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2111858644.2892.1299538259514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7169) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7169 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7169 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 07 23:47:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65891 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 23:47:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2011 23:47:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 54902 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 23:47:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54771 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2011 23:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54627 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2011 23:47:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:47:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:47:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11839CD62 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1044695845.3019.1299541619496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003694#comment-13003694 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------------------- +1 patch looks good. With only exception that we shouldn't overuse this 'facility' > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:03:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15850 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:03:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 91242 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91211 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91203 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:03:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:03:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B6A39C3B7 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2142003750.3073.1299542579523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6912: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:03:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16655 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 92554 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92516 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92485 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:03:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:03:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B8339C3B4 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <628869758.3071.1299542579470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6912: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:09:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46390 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:09:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 9637 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:09:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9606 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9596 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:09:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:09:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:09:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53D039C534 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:08:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kan Zhang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <438061063.3090.1299542939673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003710#comment-13003710 ] Kan Zhang commented on HADOOP-6912: ----------------------------------- This patch is simple enough that eyeballing should provide confidence. However, one should check again whether the HDFS or MR builds break since the signature of a public method is changing. > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:31:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9899 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:31:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 70827 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:31:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70759 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70527 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:31:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:31:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:31:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B01339CCB3 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:30:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <495334931.3140.1299544259500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003720#comment-13003720 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6912: ---------------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:51:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97112 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:51:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 14609 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14326 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14310 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:51:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:51:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287039C450 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <545918969.3211.1299545460466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7170) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Support UGI in FileContext API ------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7170 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: security Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey Fix For: 0.23.0 The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 00:51:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97365 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 00:51:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16898 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16836 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16777 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 00:51:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:51:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:51:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8839539C453 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Support UGI in FileContext API ------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7171 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: security Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey Fix For: 0.23.0 The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 01:22:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85333 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 95808 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95775 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95763 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:22:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:22:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB4B39CE9A for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1976075950.3326.1299547319442.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6912: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks to Kan. > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 01:22:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85368 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 96085 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95984 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95878 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 01:22:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:22:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:22:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C85439CE9D for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430022177.3328.1299547319506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003754#comment-13003754 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6912: ---------------------------------------------- > one should check again whether the HDFS or MR builds break since the signature of a public method is changing. This method is not being used in HDFS or MR in trunk. > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 01:24:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95643 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 01:24:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 01:24:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2128 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:24:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2092 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:24:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2084 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 01:24:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:24:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:24:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA139CF6E for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:24:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <178111327.3354.1299547440388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003756#comment-13003756 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6949: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12472850/arrayprim_v5.patch against trunk revision 1078669. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1078 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1072 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/303//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/303//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/303//console This message is automatically generated. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 01:34:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34091 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 01:34:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 01:34:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22425 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22387 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22349 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 01:34:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:34:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:34:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C819D39C239 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 01:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <266082047.3375.1299548040816.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 02:23:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82874 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 39353 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39267 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39059 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:23:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:23:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B634339C224 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:22:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1539840297.3481.1299550979743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 02:23:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82856 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 39081 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39050 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39042 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 02:23:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:23:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:23:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A2239C221 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:22:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <656553326.3479.1299550979691.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7154.txt Attached patch only does the MALLOC_ARENA_MAX bit. The ulimit fix is tougher since it appears to not be very portable. > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 02:25:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91053 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 43459 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43416 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43407 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 02:25:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:25:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:25:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEB239C2D6 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:24:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1819943212.3491.1299551099438.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003787#comment-13003787 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- I'll assume you're joking about the "huge warning" and implement option #3. Thanks Allen. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 02:55:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96200 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 02:55:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1439 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1266 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1079 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:55:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:55:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF439C995 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <951842791.3522.1299552899611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7156.txt Here's a patch which implements the configuration option. I did not add it to core-default since it's a corner case... does that seem reasonable or should it be documented? > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 02:55:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96281 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 02:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2079 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2049 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2039 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 02:55:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:55:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:55:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56A739C99C for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 02:54:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1716097838.3529.1299552899805.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 03:27:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98449 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 03:27:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 03:27:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 60606 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 03:27:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60580 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 03:27:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60563 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 03:27:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 03:27:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 03:27:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AFA39C0D8 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 03:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 03:26:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Greg Roelofs (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <149314971.3579.1299554819544.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003796#comment-13003796 ] Greg Roelofs commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------------- bq. I did not add it to core-default since it's a corner case... does that seem reasonable or should it be documented? Please please please...always document things like this. Picture it from the perspective of some new user who hasn't discovered the lists yet (or hasn't been subscribed for very long, and then only on the -user list(s)): they know they're running RHEL-6 and probably will notice a config item that explicitly mentions it (which I'd recommend, along with CentOS and any other known distro versions), but they're much less likely to know what's up with a random glibc crash several months later. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 06:11:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38568 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 06:11:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 06:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2922 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 06:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2873 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 06:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2854 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 06:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7671439C76D for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1357250991.3750.1299564659481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: arrayprim_v6.patch Added @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") annotations to 6 uses of UTF8 class methods (which usages are consistent with usages in ObjectWritable.java). > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:11:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14456 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:11:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 95032 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94677 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94471 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:11:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:35:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899A739C1EF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2091456777.3848.1299569699560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7172: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7172.txt Here's a patch, but it will end up conflicting once 7115 is committed. > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:11:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14492 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:11:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 94822 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94621 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94364 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:11:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:35:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9720B39C1F2 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <952656567.3850.1299569699615.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7172: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:12:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15485 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:11:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 881 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 835 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 801 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:11:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:11:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:35:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A656139C1F4 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1467251144.3852.1299569699678.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7172: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Todd Lipcon > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:16:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19905 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:16:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 15212 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14910 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14691 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:16:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:01:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7090039C7D3 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1629313008.3821.1299567659457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7173) Remove unused fstat() call from NativeIO MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove unused fstat() call from NativeIO ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7173 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7173 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 After HADOOP-7115, we don't need the fstat() native call or Stat class anymore. Let's remove them to cut down on unneeded code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:17:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21398 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 24407 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22666 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21829 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:57:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BA339C5E8 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:56:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7172 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io, security Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.22.0 The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:17:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21955 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:17:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:17:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24747 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24335 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22502 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:16:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:16:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:01:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E56339C7D6 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <569531829.3823.1299567659514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10330397.93631295565704195.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7115) Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003839#comment-13003839 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7115: ------------------------------------- bq. Do we need fstat and the Stat type at all now? I think not, we might as well remove it. Actually, just to keep this closer to the 0.20 security branch, why don't we do that part in a separate JIRA. Filed HADOOP-7173. > Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7115 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Attachments: h-7115.1.patch > > > As discussed in HADOOP-6978, a cache helps a lot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 08:35:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5344 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 08:35:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 08:35:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 65498 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:35:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65362 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 08:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65351 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 08:35:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:35:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9054139C5CB for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <565981353.3914.1299573299588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7164) rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003859#comment-13003859 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HADOOP-7164: ---------------------------------------------- it will be useful to user if we provide the error message instead of keep quite. > rmr command is not displaying any error message when a path contains wildcard characters and does not exist. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7164 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1609-src.patch, HDFS-1609-test.patch, HDFS-1609.patch > > > When we give invalid directory path then it will show error message on the console. But if we provide the wildcard expression in invalid directory path then it will not show any error message even there is no pattern match for that path. > linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test/test > rmr: cannot remove /test/test: No such file or directory. > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin # ./hdfs dfs -rmr /test* * > *linux-9j5v:/home/hadoop-hdfs-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT/bin #* -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 09:16:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21724 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 09:16:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 09:16:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 31948 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 09:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31912 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 09:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31883 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 09:16:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:16:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:47:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D37839C399 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 06:46:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <14795763.3805.1299566819509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <10330397.93631295565704195.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7115) Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003835#comment-13003835 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7115: ------------------------------------- A few comments: - getUIDforFDOwnerforOwner is a kind of messy name - maybe just getUIDForFDOwner? - The following should probably be debug level: {code} LOG.info("Got UserName " + user + " for UID " + uid + " from the native implementation"); {code} - ensureInitialized has a formatting issue (cacheTimeout is on the same line as the opening if) - The log message there should also probably be debug level - Do we need fstat and the Stat type at all now? I think not, we might as well remove it. - The change in getGroup.c seems unrelated to this JIRA, right? > Add a cache for getpwuid_r and getpwgid_r calls > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7115 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7115 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Attachments: h-7115.1.patch > > > As discussed in HADOOP-6978, a cache helps a lot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 09:58:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54882 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 09:58:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 09:58:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 82523 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 09:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82499 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 09:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82491 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 09:58:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:58:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:58:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8946739D696 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G Priority: Minor When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 10:00:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56258 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 10:00:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 10:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 88611 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 10:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88586 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 10:00:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88578 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 10:00:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:00:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:00:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737ED39D75F for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:59:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <300926130.4059.1299578399469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G reassigned HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 11:15:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4710 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 11:15:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 81446 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81414 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81406 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:15:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:15:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8435539CE99 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <407951474.4115.1299582899538.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003895#comment-13003895 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6912: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #624 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/624/]) HADOOP-6912. Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased(). Contributed by Kan Zhang. > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 11:15:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4881 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 81689 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81659 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81651 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:15:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:15:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C2839CE97 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <649770415.4113.1299582899483.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003894#comment-13003894 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #624 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/624/]) HADOOP-7167. Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 14:21:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21425 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 14:21:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 14:21:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 42430 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42397 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42383 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 14:21:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:21:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:21:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D30839DD3C for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:21:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <885543979.4467.1299594067312.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7174: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7174.patch > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 14:47:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25995 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 14:47:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 14:47:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6072 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:47:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6036 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 14:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6028 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 14:47:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:47:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:47:23 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366B639D8B2 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:47:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1975849353.4556.1299595621219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7174: ---------------------------------------- Release Note: Patch provided Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 18:37:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39014 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 18:30:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 18:30:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7995 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:30:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7943 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:30:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7880 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 18:30:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:30:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:30:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C132339D3F4 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:29:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1349930333.5607.1299608999786.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7172: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7172.txt After sleeping on this, I had second thoughts about the original way I did the patch. It doesn't seem good to me that, on an insecure cluster, we have different semantics based on whether the native libraries are available. So, I've changed the condition such that the check is always skipped when security is disabled, regardless of presence of the native libs. Updated the JavaDoc to indicate that the security check is only done when security is enabled. > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt, hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 18:39:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52254 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 18:32:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 18:32:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11031 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:32:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11005 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:32:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10997 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 18:32:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:32:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:32:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6FC39D53F for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:32:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <203904058.5626.1299609120186.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004122#comment-13004122 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6949: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12472916/arrayprim_v6.patch against trunk revision 1079071. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/304//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/304//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/304//console This message is automatically generated. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 18:40:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59686 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 18:34:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 18:34:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 39857 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 16:47:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39820 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 16:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39812 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 16:47:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:47:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:47:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E99B39D015 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:46:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <313446781.5207.1299602819646.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004050#comment-13004050 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7172: ------------------------------------- +1 Change looks good. Please update the javadoc ("@throws IOException if an IO Error occurred, or the user does not match") to qualify this for the new behavior. > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 18:55:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33833 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 18:52:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 18:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 48784 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48737 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 18:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48729 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 18:52:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:52:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:52:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05E539DF1D for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <411753473.5737.1299610319653.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7172: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7172.txt Sorry, forgot to tweak unit tests for the change. This patch should pass both with security on and off > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt, hadoop-7172.txt, hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 19:29:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60382 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28279 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28221 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28213 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 19:29:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:29:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:29:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039E239E005 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:29:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1241314125.5831.1299612541011.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7156.txt Updated version includes docs in core-default.xml Do you agree with the current test case? It will fail with JVM exit on RHEL6 currently. Should we set the workaround variable to true in the test settings? Another option is to add a bit of code to apply some regexes to /etc/redhat-release and enable by default if running RHEL or CentOS 6. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 19:33:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86547 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 19:33:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 19:33:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 32254 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 19:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32216 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 19:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32208 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 19:33:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:33:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:33:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA0639E177 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:32:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1997059073.5860.1299612779838.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004150#comment-13004150 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6949: --------------------------------------------- I am perfectly fine with dealing with complex types in another jira. If Suresh could review this it should be good to commit. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 20:36:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7953 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 46058 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46019 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46011 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 20:36:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:36:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:36:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FCA39D8CE for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <53757600.6039.1299616559926.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004195#comment-13004195 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ > have broken implementations of Let's call it for what it is: POSIX non-compliance. > Systems known to exhibit this issue include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.0, > CentOS 6.0, and Vintela Authentication Services. Why is this text in here? What happens when RHEL 6 gets this fixed? Do we make a new release to pull the text out? To me, it makes much more sense to include a link to a wiki page where we can keep the information up-to-date. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 20:40:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8698 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 51064 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51035 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51027 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 20:40:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:40:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:40:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD9739DA5A for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:39:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1492281362.6049.1299616799573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004197#comment-13004197 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- bq. What happens when RHEL 6 gets this fixed That will be RHEL 6.1, not RHEL 6.0. So this should remain accurate. Happy to change "Vintela Authentication Services" to "some version of Vintela Authentication Services". bq. it makes much more sense to include a link to a wiki page where we can keep the information up-to-date In my experience, we do a really bad job of keeping the wiki up to date. Greg, what do you think? > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 20:59:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57185 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 20:59:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 20:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 94403 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:59:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94313 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 20:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94305 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 20:59:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:59:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:59:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D655139E257 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1744068995.6103.1299617939874.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004209#comment-13004209 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- The approach and code look good to me. I would leave as is, no need to add autodetection, but we should document it in core-default so users are aware of the issue. I think leaving the workaround disabled for the tests is the right thing, this way it fails on a broken system which will help users identify that they need to enable the workaround. Also, the description seems appropriate to me, this isn't about POSIX compliance, it's just a bug in a library function, that will probably be fixed. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 21:36:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5888 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 66472 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66443 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66435 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 21:36:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:36:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:36:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B253B39EF5A for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:36:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <661322595.6207.1299620160727.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004231#comment-13004231 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7154: ----------------------------------- +1 > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 22:24:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59395 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 22:24:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 22:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 66181 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 22:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66150 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 22:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66142 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 22:24:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:24:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:24:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD7C39E2A2 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Greg Roelofs (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1701212210.6379.1299623039586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004258#comment-13004258 ] Greg Roelofs commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------------- Doh! FF crashed while I was replying, sigh. Switching to e-mail: bq. In my experience, we do a really bad job of keeping the wiki up to date. Greg, what do you think? I agree--we're much better at keeping the code up to date (frequently in parallel across multiple branches ;-) ) than at keeping the wiki current. I think the XML config text is fine; you could optionally prefix it with "As of March 2011, systems known to ..." as a hint to users or future versions of us to recheck it if significant time has passed. The comment in NativeIO.c probably should be modified; perhaps "monitor used for working around a bug in the sssd security daemon, which was observed in getpwuid_r() on RHEL 6.0," or words to that effect. (Need not be that verbose, of course.) I also agree with Eli that we can leave the workaround disabled for tests. It might be worthwhile to add a log message at the start that "this test may fail (crash) with an invalid free() on some systems; see HADOOP-7156 for details." Again, feel free to word it however you wish. Trivial grammo: "workaround" is a noun; the verb form is "work around" (similar to layout, backup, setup, cleanup, checkin, cutoff, etc.). The various variable names would be more proper if they reflected this (e.g., WORK_AROUND_NON_THREADSAFE_CALLS_KEY, workAroundNonThreadSafePasswdCalls [or workAroundNonThreadsafePasswdCalls, since you're using "threadsafe" as a single word elsewhere]), but I won't fuss if you leave them as is. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 22:59:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62361 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 22:59:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 22:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 32944 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 22:59:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32907 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 22:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32885 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 22:59:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:59:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:59:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A839ECDD for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 22:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1480480034.6441.1299625139719.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004271#comment-13004271 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ > That will be RHEL 6.1, not RHEL 6.0. So this should remain accurate. If I rpm install just a new pam from the Red Hat repo, what version am I running? > I agree--we're much better at keeping the code up to date (frequently in > parallel across multiple branches ) than at keeping the wiki current. Really? We haven't had a release marked stable in over a year. (Releases outside Apache do *not* count.) > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 23:35:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17319 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 23:35:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 23:35:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 83008 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 23:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82981 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 23:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82973 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 23:35:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:35:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:35:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726E739E4C4 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:34:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Greg Roelofs (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <833161649.6588.1299627299465.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004284#comment-13004284 ] Greg Roelofs commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------------- bq. Really? We haven't had a release marked stable in over a year. (Releases outside Apache do *not* count.) How many of the "currently relevant" wiki pages have been updated in that year-plus? (I haven't checked, but the one or two "getting started" ones I looked at way back when were incomplete at best, and possibly wrong in places, so I'm guessing the answer is "not many." That's certainly been my repeated experience with internal, corporate wikis.) In my experience, the farther the docs are from the code, the less likely they are to be current and correct. That doesn't mean there can't be additional forms of non-repo docs, but docs within the source-code repo should be the priority. Many of us _live_ in the repo, employmentally speaking. (New word. Cool.) > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 08 23:52:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68021 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2011 23:52:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2011 23:52:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2742 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 23:52:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2702 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2011 23:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2694 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2011 23:52:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:52:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:52:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2F139E966 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1084234756.6623.1299628324631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk and branch-22. Thanks Tom for reviewing. > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 00:21:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49041 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 00:21:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 00:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17560 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 00:10:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17524 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 00:10:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17494 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 00:10:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:10:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:10:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5774539ED58 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:10:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2068270548.6685.1299629401355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004298#comment-13004298 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------- +1 on this patch, however, even with the backwards compatibility now provided, I'd like to see the HDFS counterpart and commit them both at once. Once that has been posted and reviewed, I'll go ahead and commit both. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 00:22:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49981 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 00:21:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 00:21:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 19370 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 00:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19232 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 00:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19039 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 00:16:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:16:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:16:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DF039EEA6 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1630087208.6697.1299629759602.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004300#comment-13004300 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ >How many of the "currently relevant" wiki pages have been updated in > that year-plus? Considering how little has changed since Apache 0.20.0 was released almost two years, not many because there was no need. This JIRA is a great example of something that will likely be long fixed before an actual Apache release with the fix sees the light of day. Which is why I'm mostly opposed to it going in, but not enough to -1 it. I think we'll look like fools when a year down the road we have a reference to a bug that was long fixed, but whatever. > Many of us live in the repo, employmentally speaking. In other words, "Who gives a damn about the people who are not running some form of trunk and are not watching JIRAs religiously." > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 01:46:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60963 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 26586 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26555 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26547 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 01:46:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:46:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8204C39E340 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1511090042.6857.1299635159529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004326#comment-13004326 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------ Hi Jakob, the HDFS counterpart has been up for some time on HDFS-1445. However, test-patch can't run against the HDFS part until this COMMON part has been committed. So perhaps it would be best if you take a quick look at HDFS-1445, then commit this patch so that I can enable test-patch to run against the other part? Thanks. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 01:51:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93923 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 01:51:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 01:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 31713 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 01:51:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31681 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 01:51:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31673 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 01:51:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:51:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:51:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D40239E4D8 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 01:50:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <555131856.6868.1299635459509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004329#comment-13004329 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------- bq. I will resubmit part-2, attached to this issue, as soon as part-1 has been approved and committed. I had interpreted this to mean there would be a new HDFS patch. Sounds like I'm incorrect and the current patch there is the one you're submitting? > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 02:05:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41377 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 02:05:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 02:05:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 41816 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 02:05:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41776 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 02:05:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41768 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 02:05:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:05:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:05:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B9339E860 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:04:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Greg Roelofs (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1479480223.6893.1299636299614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004333#comment-13004333 ] Greg Roelofs commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------------- That wasn't my personal experience (with the setup-related ones), but admittedly it's a tiny sample. Dude, I'm still running a 2004-era distro on one of my desktop boxes! Sure, that's unusual, but ancient servers in production definitely aren't. The more you have, the harder it is to validate and move to a new version. You've got, what, a few hundred servers to worry about? We've got a few hundred thousand. (Not all Hadoop-related, I mean, just in general.) I have no idea what the overall mix is, but I was aware of both RHEL 5.x and 4.x subsets up until fairly recently (the latter also being 2004-era; the former more like 2007, I think), and I wouldn't be surprised if there were still *BSD boxes lurking somewhere. I don't think there are any RHEL 6.x yet. So no, OS-related docs don't get stale _that_ quickly, at least not for some of us. :-) Not at all. It's simply a statement that those working most closely with the code and XML configs--i.e., those who _do_ watch JIRAs and the mailing lists religiously--are more likely to keep things updated if they're nearby/noticeable. We all have limited attention-hours to devote to maintenance, so anything that makes it easier, faster, or more likely to happen is a Good Thing. And I _know_ you're aware that the default state for documentation is "nonexistent." Especially where developers are concerned. (Btw, wasn't there a recent suggestion to automatically pull config keys and descriptions out of the foo-default.xml files and publish them? With something like that in place, the docs you want would fall out of this and similar patches immediately. One of my mottos for the last few years has been, "if it can be automated, it should be automated.") I guess this has drifted a bit; perhaps further discussion should go to one of the lists? > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 02:20:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74655 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 02:20:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 02:20:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 49750 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 02:20:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49701 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 02:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49692 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 02:20:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:20:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 02:20:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAE839F752 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 02:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <161461447.6917.1299637199454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004338#comment-13004338 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------ Yes. s/resubmit/push the "submit patch" button again for/ > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 06:04:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26927 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 06:04:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 06:04:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 39951 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 06:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39419 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 06:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38939 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 06:04:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:04:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:04:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75673A05C3 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <419357987.7175.1299650644813.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004383#comment-13004383 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-7133: --------------------------------------- Matt, this optimization is fantastic. I have ported it to our internal branch. Together with parallel upgrades, it cut the DN upgrade time from 1 hour 40 minutes to 1 minute! Awesome job! +1. The patch looks good. One minor optimization is that you could use ThreadLocal for shell commands. This will remove the need to create a buffer for each shell command to run. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 11:14:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3735 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 53710 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53653 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 11:14:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53645 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 11:14:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:14:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:14:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2C93A0CAB for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <979097868.7571.1299669239710.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004476#comment-13004476 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #625 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/625/]) HADOOP-7154. Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 18:05:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86570 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 18:05:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 18:05:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 12432 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:05:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12368 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12360 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 18:05:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:05:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:05:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4F3A1550 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <740083816.8548.1299693899598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004684#comment-13004684 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ Actually, rather than let you dig Yahoo! in deeper, I'm just going to -1 the patch due to the config description on the grounds that it is both too generic and too specific: * Are we going to update this list if Debian/Scientific Linux/Mandriva/... are found to be non-POSIX compliant? * If yes, are we going to push a new Apache release when this list is updated? * What does RHEL 6.0 actually mean? If I put a new pam rpm that fixes the issue, am I still running RHEL 6.0? A living document for when to use this as an option is going to be much better over the long haul than a static file. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 18:17:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95275 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 37250 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37219 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37211 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 18:17:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:17:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:17:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE5B3A18D1 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:16:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <940183207.8577.1299694619713.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004691#comment-13004691 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- I will answer all of your questions and hope you will withdraw your -1: bq. Are we going to update this list if Debian/Scientific Linux/Mandriva/... are found to be non-POSIX compliant? I will happily volunteer to +1 and commit a patch that anyone should submit to update the list. Please feel free to do so. The list doesn't claim to be complete, only to provide some examples of systems where it's the case. bq. If yes, are we going to push a new Apache release when this list is updated? No, like any other documentation improvement it should wait for the next release. Our definitive documentation lives in the source tree. The fact that some of it is in the wiki doesn't change that. bq. What does RHEL 6.0 actually mean? If I put a new pam rpm that fixes the issue, am I still running RHEL 6.0? I would assume RHEL 6.0 means that you are not installing packages that are not part of the RHEL 6.0 release. If you went and installed a random RPM that you built from source or some other vendor, you're no longer running a stock RHEL 6.0. Again, the docs are not meant to be complete. Assumedly if you've updated your pam manually to workaround this issue, you'd know that, and you wouldn't turn on the config option! And, seriously, with the HADOOP-7115 cache in place, this becomes a really rare race condition. Is it really worth making such a big deal? I'd like to move on to fixing other bugs, please. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 18:47:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11899 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 18:47:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 8568 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8531 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8423 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 18:47:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:47:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:47:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FAF3A1875 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:47:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <356547615.8708.1299696420271.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004720#comment-13004720 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ > No, like any other documentation improvement it should wait for the > next release. Our definitive documentation lives in the source tree. > The fact that some of it is in the wiki doesn't change that. I agree to a certain extent. But listing a moving target from suffering from a problem that exists today that may not exist tomorrow for a release of our software that is still months out is a mistake. CentOS 6.0 doesn't even exist yet in any official form yet we're declaring it bugged. > Assumedly if you've updated your pam manually to workaround this issue, > you'd know that, and you wouldn't turn on the config option! What I am applying the 6-updates repo after a kick? Are packages from https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html not considered part of RHEL 6? I suspect Red Hat would disagree. I realize that for the majority of committers don't actually use an Apache release so this doesn't seem like a big deal since you folks release seemingly monthly, if not more frequent. I also realize that in order for the various commercial interests involved it behooves them to get any and all patches committed to show that they are "contributing". The reality is that by the time this patch shows up in an actual Apache release, it is bound to be outdated.... and that's where I take offense. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 18:59:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37744 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 18:59:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 18:59:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 26079 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25953 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25800 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 18:59:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:59:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:59:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECE63A1D32 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add isEnabled() to Trash ------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7175 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.22.0 The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 19:03:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67428 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 19:03:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 42249 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42219 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42211 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D14B3A1EC3 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1405550983.8768.1299697379640.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7175: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 19:03:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67769 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 19:03:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 43644 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43611 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43603 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 19:03:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889163A1EC0 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <575836641.8765.1299697379555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7175: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7175.patch Adds isEnabled() method and corresponding tests. > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 19:11:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93479 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 19:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 65503 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65390 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65357 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71C3A1320 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1415942065.8828.1299697859707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6236) clean-up Trash.moveToTrash() code. Should throw exception instead of returning false MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan resolved HADOOP-6236. --------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Resolving as duplicate of HADOOP-6345 > clean-up Trash.moveToTrash() code. Should throw exception instead of returning false > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > > In case of errors it should throw an exception instead of returning false. > One valid case is when interval is 0 (trash disabled), but that could be moved to a separate method isEnabled(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 19:11:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93572 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 19:11:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 65943 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65868 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65663 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 19:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66CF3A1326 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <945141946.8834.1299697859875.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7156.txt Made a wiki page and linked to it. If you don't like this patch or the wiki page, please edit it and contribute a version you find acceptable. Otherwise I will consider this version acceptable and commit tomorrow. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 19:44:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91599 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 34379 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34344 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 19:44:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34336 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:44:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:44:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671253A1E5F for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:43:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Redesign FsShell ---------------- Key: HADOOP-7176 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.22.0 The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 20:41:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88698 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 20:41:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 20:41:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 60218 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 20:41:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60097 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 20:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60089 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 20:41:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:41:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:41:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A743A1526 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:40:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Olga Natkovich (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1549838432.9087.1299703259536.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004786#comment-13004786 ] Olga Natkovich commented on HADOOP-7176: ---------------------------------------- Pig project uses FsShell to export HDFS commands to the users. Things that are important to us: (1) Backward compatibility (2) Better error handling. At this point if command fails it seems to always return -1 so we can't tell different problems apart. > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 20:47:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11155 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 20:47:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 20:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77288 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 20:47:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77255 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 20:47:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77244 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 20:47:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:47:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:47:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C293A182B for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:46:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <443853259.9105.1299703619733.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004790#comment-13004790 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------- Hairong: Good suggestion on the threadlocal. I'm ready to commit this as is. Would you be ok with doing that optimization in separate JIRA? > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 21:06:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91755 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 21:06:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 21:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 19455 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:06:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19418 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:06:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19410 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 21:06:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:06:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:06:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A643F3A1F09 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <831096708.9143.1299704759677.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004797#comment-13004797 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7176: ------------------------------------- Definitively maintaining backwards compatibility. Let's discuss #2 offline. > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 21:12:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93765 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 21:12:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 21:12:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 32458 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:12:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32420 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:12:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32412 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 21:12:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:12:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:12:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653083A1151 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:12:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1780407804.9159.1299705120411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004799#comment-13004799 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7176: ------------------------------------- What do you mean by offline? Design discussions should be on JIRA. > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 09 21:20:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10991 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 53481 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53444 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53435 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 21:20:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:20:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8718B3A165D for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 21:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1440058693.9199.1299705599550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004803#comment-13004803 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7176: ------------------------------------- My apologies, we are both yahoos so I figured we could internally discuss and then summarize for approval. > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 00:34:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34101 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 00:34:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 00:34:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 83931 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:34:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83858 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83641 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 00:34:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:34:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:34:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637154A8A9 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 CodecPool should report which compressor it is using ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7177 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: native Reporter: Allen Wittenauer Priority: Trivial Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 00:36:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49849 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 86953 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86924 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86916 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222054A920 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1205293346.9670.1299717360136.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7177.txt > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 00:36:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49869 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 87166 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87131 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86978 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3446C4A924 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:36:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1710505014.9672.1299717360211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Allen Wittenauer Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 01:58:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85205 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 56796 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56759 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56751 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:58:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:58:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E11F3A0989 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <823099050.9889.1299722279644.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004943#comment-13004943 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Todd, the exclude file does not work on Cygwin. Could you take a look? {noformat} ... BUILD FAILED z:\_tsz\hadoop\hdfs\h1\build.xml:745: The following error occurred while executing this line: z:\_tsz\hadoop\hdfs\h1\build.xml:677: The following error occurred while executing this line: z:\_tsz\hadoop\hdfs\h1\build.xml:613: Excludesfile z:\dev\null not found. Total time: 16 seconds {noformat} > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 02:08:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38058 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 64930 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64895 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64886 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:08:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:08:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698683A0C21 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:07:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2025554241.9900.1299722879428.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004945#comment-13004945 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------ Hi Hairong, glad it's working well for you. Your suggestion to use ThreadLocal buffers is perfect. It will take me a little time to implement and test, though, so I'd like to go ahead with Jakob's suggestion, if you don't mind, so we can proceed with review of the second part of the patch in HDFS-1445. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 03:28:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71827 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 03:28:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 03:28:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 12155 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 03:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11922 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 03:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11911 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 03:28:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:28:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:28:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024D43A1FAA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:28:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <868433248.9957.1299727680005.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004956#comment-13004956 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- Hey Allen, If you find the config description "both too generic and too specific" perhaps you could suggest a better one before veto'ing the patch? Thanks, Eli > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 05:20:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17832 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 84980 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84678 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84659 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:20:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCCA3A17AA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1406105811.10018.1299734399774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reopened HADOOP-7167: --------------------------------- > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 05:20:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17857 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 85067 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85000 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84688 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:20:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:20:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9AD3A17A4 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1804404119.10013.1299734399642.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004968#comment-13004968 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------- Hey Nicholas. Really sorry about that! Do you know if there is some equivalent to /dev/null in cygwin? ie a file which is always guaranteed to exist and be empty? I wonder what happens if we just pass an empty parameter to the ant excludeFile tag... If this is getting in your way, feel free to revert and we can commit a new version that works on both platforms. > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 10:57:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20184 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 10:57:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 10:57:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 7167 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 10:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7133 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 10:57:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7125 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 10:57:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:57:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:57:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF79F3A261A for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1986492955.10457.1299754619781.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G moved HDFS-1733 to HADOOP-7178: --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7178 (was: HDFS-1733) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 15:04:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45618 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 61301 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61261 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61253 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33C3A183B for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <681550845.10789.1299769439497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 0.20.2 0.21.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 15:04:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45677 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 61664 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61617 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61388 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976433A1846 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1801897752.10793.1299769439616.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 15:04:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45651 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 61443 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61370 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61262 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ABD3A1840 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2088361692.10791.1299769439560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 15:30:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22488 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15105 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15078 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15070 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:30:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:30:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACEC3A24C9 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:29:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1385994617.10843.1299770999565.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005104#comment-13005104 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------------------ Cygwin actually has {{/dev/null}}. The following works. {noformat} $ ls > /dev/null {noformat} Interestingly, {{ls}} shows it only if the full path is given. {noformat} $ ls -l /dev/null crw-rw-rw- 1 tsz Users 1, 3 Nov 30 2006 /dev/null $ ls -l /dev total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 tsz Users 13 Oct 23 2009 fd -> /proc/self/fd lrwxrwxrwx 1 tsz Users 15 Oct 23 2009 stderr -> /proc/self/fd/2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 tsz Users 15 Oct 23 2009 stdin -> /proc/self/fd/0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 tsz Users 15 Oct 23 2009 stdout -> /proc/self/fd/1 {noformat} > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 20:04:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65560 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 82133 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82103 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82095 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5FC3A26B9 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2038449206.11734.1299787439571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005299#comment-13005299 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-7133: --------------------------------------- Sure, please go ahead and commit it. I already +1 it. :) > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 20:11:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82822 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 20:11:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 20:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 98283 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98191 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98117 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 20:11:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534293A2C3A for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Improve HDFS startup scripts ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7179 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: scripts Reporter: Tanping Wang Priority: Minor Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 20:13:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83243 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 20:13:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 20:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3971 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3944 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 20:13:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3935 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 20:13:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:13:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:13:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC243A2D33 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:12:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1739167197.11766.1299787979441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7179: --------------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-1703.patch-common > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HDFS-1703.patch-common > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 21:21:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96345 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 21:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12708 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12676 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12647 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:21:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:21:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679BC3A37AB for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <920656896.11906.1299792059420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7179: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HDFS-1703.patch-common) > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 21:21:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96342 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 21:21:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12494 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12348 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12305 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 21:21:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:21:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:21:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBEF3A37AC for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <860774437.11907.1299792059454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7179: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7179.patch > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 22:14:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75393 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 96296 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96270 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96262 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:14:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4333A2868 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Improve CommandFormat --------------------- Key: HADOOP-7180 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.22.0 CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 22:18:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84057 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3221 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3125 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3116 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:18:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:18:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EBA3A2A3B for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:17:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1837181934.11973.1299795479796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7180: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7180.patch Add a slew of tests, add exceptions for too many/few, allowing parsing a list. Backwards compatibility. > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 22:20:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91863 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5252 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5225 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5217 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:20:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:20:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B807F3A2AD2 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:19:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <885576611.11975.1299795599750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7180: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:24:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4249 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 392 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 359 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 351 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:24:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:24:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8F93A30D5 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1230611280.12168.1299799439519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005395#comment-13005395 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7166: ---------------------------------------------- >Is the motivation for this for MapReduce to use DaemonFactory? The motivation is that it is not specific to hdfs and could be used outside hdfs as well, and Daemon.java in common seems to be a logical place to put DaemonFactory. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:36:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59198 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 12157 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12117 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12109 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:36:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:36:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9243A342F for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:35:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <458008222.12194.1299800159642.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-7133: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) 0.23.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Resolving as fixed. Matt, please open a JIRA for Hairong's suggestion. Thanks. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5443 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30731 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30679 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30671 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDFE3A392B for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1605344812.12239.1299801240123.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005410#comment-13005410 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5516 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 31242 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31187 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31120 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A333A391D for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <530423876.12225.1299801239724.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <824415802.6352.1299019897038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7159) RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005408#comment-13005408 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7159: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) > RPC server should log the client hostname when read exception happened > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7159 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7159.txt > > > This makes find mismatched clients easier -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5553 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 31447 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31399 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31285 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8E73A3921 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1577538168.12229.1299801239834.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005409#comment-13005409 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5657 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 31678 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31654 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31646 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:40 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1CC3A3932 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1937564759.12246.1299801241366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1846874015.7578.1296749909031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7131) set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005412#comment-13005412 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7131: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) > set() and toString Methods of the org.apache.hadoop.io.Text class does not include the root exception, in the wrapping RuntimeException. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7131 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7131 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7131.patch > > > In below code snippets, we can include e, instead of e.toString(), so that caller can get complete trace. > 1) > /** Set to contain the contents of a string. > */ > public void set(String string) { > try { > ByteBuffer bb = encode(string, true); > bytes = bb.array(); > length = bb.limit(); > }catch(CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } > 2) > public String toString() { > try { > return decode(bytes, 0, length); > } catch (CharacterCodingException e) { > throw new RuntimeException("Should not have happened ",e.toString()); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5701 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 32658 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32621 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32577 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE693A392D for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1669855453.12241.1299801240180.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005411#comment-13005411 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7133: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) HADOOP-7133. Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(). Contributed by Matt Foley. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 10 23:54:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5732 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 33018 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32985 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32946 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679893A3934 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:54:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1681494637.12248.1299801241421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6912) Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005413#comment-13005413 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6912: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #523 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/523/]) > Guard against NPE when calling UGI.isLoginKeytabBased() > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6912 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6912 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Kan Zhang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c6912-01.patch > > > NPE can happen when isLoginKeytabBased() is called before a login is performed. See MAPREDUCE-1992 for an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 00:12:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60842 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 50019 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49970 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49765 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:12:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F3B3A3E3A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <762485406.12281.1299802319824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005423#comment-13005423 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Jitendra, when you say DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common, you mean HDFS federation branch right? > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 00:12:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60916 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 50299 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50272 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50263 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:12:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:12:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884773A3E31 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:11:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1081049168.12272.1299802319554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005421#comment-13005421 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the change. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 01:11:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57067 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 93287 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93086 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93068 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49643A3EFC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <179665913.12425.1299805859802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 01:11:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57084 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 93127 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93083 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93067 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A3D3A3EFA for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <317060677.12423.1299805859744.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 01:11:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57096 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 93514 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93478 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93125 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CCA3A3EF7 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <223076989.12421.1299805859679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005442#comment-13005442 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7166: ---------------------------------------------- > you mean HDFS federation branch right? That is correct. Currently DaemonFactory is committed to the federation branch only. This patch adds it to the common branch and federation branch code will be changed to use the DaemonFactory from common (HDFS-1730). > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 04:41:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29766 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 04:41:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 04:41:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 99979 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 04:41:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99958 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 04:41:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99940 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 04:41:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F23A3A5F for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1073276735.12635.1299818460515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005480#comment-13005480 ] Joep Rottinghuis commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------------ What is the plan for the Git repos? I'm hoping that we can stick a fork in the separate repos and simply maintain everything in the hadoop-common one, as that already has the three projects on the 0.21* branches. Having three Git repos->three Jenkins jobs and coordinating them is a pain. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 05:11:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29514 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 05:11:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 05:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 30460 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 05:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30034 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 05:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29881 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 05:11:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:11:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:11:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9683A3289 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:10:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1168956648.12687.1299820259506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005493#comment-13005493 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7156: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473179/hadoop-7156.txt against trunk revision 1080396. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/306//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/306//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/306//console This message is automatically generated. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 07:33:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95074 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 43998 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43947 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43939 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:33:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:33:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5B33A38F8 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:32:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <939088155.12860.1299828779571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005535#comment-13005535 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- +1 for the latest patch > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 11:15:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91936 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 32626 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32591 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32583 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:15:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:15:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF0B3A3384 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <499779821.13193.1299842099434.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005601#comment-13005601 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7133: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #627 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/627/]) HADOOP-7133. Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(). Contributed by Matt Foley. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 15:40:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70804 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 15:40:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 15:40:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 96078 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 15:40:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96048 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 15:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96040 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 15:40:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:40:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:40:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866863A43FA for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1098394576.13604.1299857999547.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G reassigned HADOOP-7178: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 15:50:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17801 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 19756 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19724 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19716 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:50:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:50:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4A83A4819 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:49:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <807446361.13619.1299858599501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 05685#comment-13005685 ]=20 Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7178: --------------------------------------------- FileSystem already has the API setVerifyChecksum. As per current implementa= tion this flag will be set in DistributedFilesystem.Based on this flag, che= cksum verification will happen. Bydefault LocalFileSystem will be selected = as local file system . But LocalFileSystem will create crc files in local = disk in all the cases because it is CheckSumFileSystem. But when user explicitly set the verifyCheckSum flag to false, then LocalFi= leSystem will create the crc files in local disk. =20 One Option to solve this issue is: We can provide an API in FileSystem which will be the getter method= (getVerifyChecksum) for setVerifyChecksum. DistributedFileSystem can overri= de this method. In Filesystem=E2=80=99s copyToLocalFile API, we can use this flag status. If this flag is disabled, then we can select RawLocalFileSystem as local fi= le system. This RawLocalFileSystem will not create any of the CRC files. > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verif= yChecksum to false at client side. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in= local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the c= hecksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then wha= t will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 16:38:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69780 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 23829 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23738 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23720 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEDB3A4A74 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1217986099.13764.1299861481570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 16:38:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69792 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 16:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 23937 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23902 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23763 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF123A4A77 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1640605861.13767.1299861481639.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: Daryn Sharp Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 16:38:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69931 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25154 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25118 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25110 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416F93A4A68 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1643860141.13753.1299861481264.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7175: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 16:38:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70055 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 16:38:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 25409 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25335 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25319 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:23 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D03F3A4A6C for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1799017579.13757.1299861481377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7175: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: Daryn Sharp Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:00:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20810 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 55543 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55472 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55463 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:00:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:00:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEC73A463D for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:59:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1782554658.13948.1299866399446.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005748#comment-13005748 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------- I missed that DaemonFactory was only in the federation branch. I agree that putting it with Daemon (marked @LimitedPrivate) in common makes sense. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:02:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37792 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:02:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 57129 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:02:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57099 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57084 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:02:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:02:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:02:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2D33A46D4 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1381128291.13953.1299866520378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7181) use ThreadLocal for HardLink command buffers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 use ThreadLocal for HardLink command buffers -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7181 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7181 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Matt Foley Assignee: Matt Foley Fix For: 0.23.0 Referring to HADOOP-7133, Hairong observed that HardLink could be improved if it used ThreadLocal to implement thread-safe re-usable buffers. We agreed to open it in a new bug so the original patch could proceed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:16:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78131 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:16:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:16:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 81148 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:16:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81089 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:16:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80873 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:16:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:16:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:16:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2CE3A4C1F for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1070422412.13998.1299867359451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7182) remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7182 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7182 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Matt Foley Assignee: Matt Foley Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 This is the third part of a refactoring of HardLink: 1. HADOOP-7133 moved HardLink from an inner class of FileUtil to a stand-alone class, but left a stub class in FileUtil to prevent breaking clients in HDFS. 2. HDFS-1445 changes the clients in HDFS to point at the new implementation. 3. After HDFS-1445 is committed, this ticket is to clean up the code by removing the backward-compatibility stub. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:24:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21175 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 96506 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96442 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96314 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:24:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5C93A4FD9 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7183 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.22.0 HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:24:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21600 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:24:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 97003 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96949 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96850 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:24:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:24:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:24:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898913A4FD4 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <94757268.14022.1299867839560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1878551188.5886.1297277337604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7133) CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005766#comment-13005766 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7133: ------------------------------------ Thanks guys. HADOOP-7181 opened for Hairong's ThreadLocal suggestion. HDFS-1445 "submit patch" activated. HADOOP-7182 opened to clean up the backward compatibility stub from FileUtils. > CLONE to COMMON - HDFS-1445 Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7133 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7133 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-1445-trunk.v23_common_1-of-3.patch > > > The fix for HDFS-1445 "Batch the calls in DataStorage to FileUtil.createHardLink(), so we call it once per directory instead of once per file" requires coordinated change in COMMON and HDFS. This is the COMMON portion, submitted here under a separate bug to activate the automated testing. > Warning: this patch to COMMON, by itself, will break HDFS. It requires coordinated commit of the HDFS portion of the patch in HDFS-1445. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:46:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87342 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 29647 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29618 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29610 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:46:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AEB3A470A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <208467215.14057.1299869159609.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005780#comment-13005780 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ Removing my -1. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:46:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87378 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 29876 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29827 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29819 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:46:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A227D3A470C for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <776242083.14059.1299869159660.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Adds a new configuration hadoop.work.around.non.threadsafe.getpwuid which can be used to enable a mutex around this call to workaround thread-unsafe implementations of getpwuid_r. Users should consult http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/KnownBrokenPwuidImplementations for a list of such systems. Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:48:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5134 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30640 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:48:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30611 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30603 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:48:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:48:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:48:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1883A47B9 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:47:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <489980328.14066.1299869279439.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005781#comment-13005781 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------- Thanks. Committed to trunk and 22 > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 18:56:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 40846 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40815 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40807 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:56:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE563A4A72 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1450688227.14084.1299869759651.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005785#comment-13005785 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Todd, have you got a chance to take a look? In case you don't have time to work on this, could you revert this, HDFS-1731 and MAPREDUCE-2367? Many thanks. > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:04:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60360 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:04:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:04:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 49700 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:04:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49630 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49398 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:04:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF63D3A4D86 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <941809286.14122.1299870239977.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005788#comment-13005788 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #524 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/524/]) HADOOP-7156. Workaround for unsafe implementations of getpwuid_r. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:10:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73602 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 56267 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56233 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56225 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:10:25 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2125A3A4FC7 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:10:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <833104281.14142.1299870604131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-7183: --------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 0.20.3 The fix should probably also be merged to the 0.20 and 0.21 branches. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:26:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21085 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 76494 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76461 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76453 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:26:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:26:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4863A43B9 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:25:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <709466648.14163.1299871559443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7183: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7183.patch The problem is that WritableComparator has a mutable field - DataInputBuffer buffer - which is only used by WritableComparable implementations that *don't* override the optimized binary compare method. IntWritable, Text, etc override this method, so there is no thread safety issue for these. The remedy is to only register comparators explicitly, i.e. not the "generic" ones, since they may not be thread-safe. This is actually the behaviour that was in place before HADOOP-6881. I've also updated the javadoc for WritableComparator.define to clarify that it should only be called for thread-safe classes. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:28:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21426 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 79466 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79401 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79393 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:28:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:28:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7065F3A4443 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:27:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1750459070.14169.1299871679457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reassigned HADOOP-7183: --------------------------------- Assignee: Tom White > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:30:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24875 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:30:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:30:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 81522 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:30:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81487 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81478 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:30:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:30:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:30:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BA93A44E4 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:29:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1777394536.14174.1299871799417.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7166.2.patch Updated patch marking DaemonFactory as LimitedPrivate. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:32:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44064 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 82045 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82010 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81998 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:32:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:32:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA873A45A7 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:31:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <477122280.14179.1299871919503.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005797#comment-13005797 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7183: ------------------------------------- +1 pending test results > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:34:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63378 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 85398 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85369 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85361 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:34:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:34:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3D83A466D for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <155269634.14190.1299872040050.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7183: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:38:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66053 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 91422 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91399 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91391 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:38:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:38:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680BD3A479F for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:37:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1891070034.14196.1299872279422.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005800#comment-13005800 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7166: ---------------------------------------------- ant test was run manually. test patch results [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. No new tests added, because DaemonFactory is a new class with a single method to construct a new Daemon, and it is not used in common. It is used in HDFS and it should be sufficient to test it there. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:40:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66432 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96369 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96330 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96321 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDA03A4857 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:39:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2124952660.14198.1299872399975.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:40:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66452 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96607 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96539 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96403 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080C53A485A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:40:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1729449256.14200.1299872400029.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:48:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97814 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 4599 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4561 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4553 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:48:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:48:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7343A4A3C for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:47:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <986111545.14204.1299872879445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005801#comment-13005801 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7175: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Daryn, there is a tab in the new isEnabled() method. We don't use tabs in Hadoop. Could you remove it? Other then that the patch looks good. > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:50:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10580 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5607 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5581 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5573 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:50:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280F33A4AEA for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:50:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1863824612.14207.1299873000160.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005802#comment-13005802 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-7183: -------------------------------------- +1 patch looks good to me too. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 19:52:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11147 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 10702 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10676 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10668 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:52:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:52:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D6C3A4BCE for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1117020772.14216.1299873119471.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005803#comment-13005803 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7183: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473422/HADOOP-7183.patch against trunk revision 1080723. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/308//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/308//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/308//console This message is automatically generated. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 20:02:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30864 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 14963 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14886 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14878 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853E83A4FB3 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1155611520.14245.1299873719542.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005810#comment-13005810 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------- Yes, sorry - I am planning to add an empty file in "src/test/empty-file" and use that as the default instead of /dev/null. Sound good? > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 20:02:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30989 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15373 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15105 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14906 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6F3A4FB6 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1936798502.14248.1299873719626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7175: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7175-2.patch Remove tab. > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 20:02:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30979 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15171 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15103 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14916 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:02:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CD53A4FB9 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <68886421.14250.1299873719683.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt How does this patch look? > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:52:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98991 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 61865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61839 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61831 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2E83A478A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <604024911.14527.1299880319763.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005861#comment-13005861 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #32 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/32/]) HADOOP-7156. Workaround for unsafe implementations of getpwuid_r. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:52:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99007 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 62005 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61930 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61840 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86F43A478C for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:51:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1667119139.14529.1299880319818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <130797695.15062.1298594983152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7154) Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005862#comment-13005862 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7154: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #32 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/32/]) > Should set MALLOC_ARENA_MAX in hadoop-env.sh > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7154 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7154.txt > > > New versions of glibc present in RHEL6 include a new arena allocator design. In several clusters we've seen this new allocator cause huge amounts of virtual memory to be used, since when multiple threads perform allocations, they each get their own memory arena. On a 64-bit system, these arenas are 64M mappings, and the maximum number of arenas is 8 times the number of cores. We've observed a DN process using 14GB of vmem for only 300M of resident set. This causes all kinds of nasty issues for obvious reasons. > Setting MALLOC_ARENA_MAX to a low number will restrict the number of memory arenas and bound the virtual memory, with no noticeable downside in performance - we've been recommending MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=4. We should set this in hadoop-env.sh to avoid this issue as RHEL6 becomes more and more common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:52:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99106 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 62675 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62616 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62608 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A913A4798 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:52:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2114051757.14541.1299880320155.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <978952244.13379.1299230917384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7162) FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005863#comment-13005863 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7162: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #32 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/32/]) > FsShell: call srcFs.listStatus(src) twice > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7162 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alexey Diomin > Assignee: Alexey Diomin > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-7162.path > > > in file ./src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java line 555 > call method twice: > 1. for init variable > 2. for getting data -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:54:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99515 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:54:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 63460 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63307 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:54:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63299 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:54:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:54:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67E33A488B for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <940574892.14547.1299880439678.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005864#comment-13005864 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Thanks Tom for suggesting the addition of @LimitedPrivate. Patch looks good to me. +1. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 21:56:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 371 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 64954 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64917 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64908 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:56:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:56:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD9E3A4967 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1637434317.14558.1299880559512.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005865#comment-13005865 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------------------ The patch works if I create {{src/test/empty-file}} manually. {noformat} BUILD FAILED z:\_tsz\hadoop\common\c2\build.xml:827: The following error occurred while executing this line: z:\_tsz\hadoop\common\c2\build.xml:807: The following error occurred while executing this line: z:\_tsz\hadoop\common\c2\build.xml:736: Excludesfile z:\_tsz\hadoop\common\c2\src\test\empty-file not found. Total time: 22 seconds {noformat} {noformat} $ touch src/test/empty-file ... BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 1 minute 4 seconds {noformat} > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 22:14:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55142 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 96526 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96489 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96478 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:14:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF383A4FF6 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <468801590.14616.1299881639500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005873#comment-13005873 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7166: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #525 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/525/]) HADOOP-7166. Add DaemonFactory to common. Contributed by Erik Steffl and jitendra. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 22:55:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92038 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 22:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 22:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 51400 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 22:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51374 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 22:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51365 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 22:55:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:55:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:55:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B303A4AE8 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:54:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2024509504.14644.1299884099478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005881#comment-13005881 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------- cool, +1 for commit then? (including the new empty-file) > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:40:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41314 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1059 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 900 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 892 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:40:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:40:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973003A4685 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:39:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1548724676.14724.1299886799616.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005902#comment-13005902 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7177: ------------------------------------- +1 Confirmed TestCodec still passes, given this just changes a log I don't think we need additional tests. {noformat} [exec] [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. [exec] {noformat} > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:46:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55403 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 8546 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8520 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8504 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:46:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861D83A47EF for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <342830211.14730.1299887159546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Closed: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins closed HADOOP-7177. ------------------------------- > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:46:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55424 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 8586 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8522 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8505 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:46:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:46:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778603A47EC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <461630175.14728.1299887159485.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7177: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk and merged to 22 and 21. Thanks Allen! > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:50:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87105 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 14118 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13995 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13877 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05803A49A5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1795118329.14744.1299887399653.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <915517661.14739.1299887399476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7184) Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7184: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7184 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation, filecache > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7184.txt > > > MAPREDUCE-2379 documents the new name of this parameter (mapreduce.tasktracker.cache.local.size) in mapred-default.xml where it belongs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:50:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87109 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13813 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13783 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13774 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3813A49A3 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <462027254.14742.1299887399570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <915517661.14739.1299887399476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7184) Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7184: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7184.txt > Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7184 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation, filecache > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7184.txt > > > MAPREDUCE-2379 documents the new name of this parameter (mapreduce.tasktracker.cache.local.size) in mapred-default.xml where it belongs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:50:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87196 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 14536 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14485 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14477 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:50:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750EE3A49A0 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <915517661.14739.1299887399476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7184) Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove deprecated local.cache.size from core-default.xml -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7184 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation, filecache Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7184.txt MAPREDUCE-2379 documents the new name of this parameter (mapreduce.tasktracker.cache.local.size) in mapred-default.xml where it belongs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:54:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88463 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 18627 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18600 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18592 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:54:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697443A4A98 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:53:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1057921594.14754.1299887639428.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005906#comment-13005906 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7177: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #526 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/526/]) HADOOP-7177. CodecPool should report which compressor it is using. Contributed by Allen Wittenauer > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 11 23:59:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89798 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22743 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22713 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22705 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:59:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:59:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691393A4BAC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <557025910.14757.1299887939427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005907#comment-13005907 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7167: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good, thanks! > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:01:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97838 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 23420 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23397 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23388 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:01:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:01:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55033A4C7B for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1009938311.14761.1299888059739.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7166: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:17:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50448 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:17:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:17:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 39827 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:17:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39797 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:17:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39789 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:17:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:17:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:17:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BA03A41BC for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:16:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <346575510.14814.1299889019552.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6361) Specific Exceptions thrown by FileContext and AbstractFileSystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey resolved HADOOP-6361. ------------------------------------------ Resolution: Duplicate This has been addressed in HADOOP-6537 > Specific Exceptions thrown by FileContext and AbstractFileSystem > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6361 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6361 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6361.1.patch > > > This jira tracks implementation of the proposal in HDFS-717. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:25:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87947 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 46059 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46030 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46022 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:25:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268D13A44DC for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:25:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2109704952.14835.1299889501154.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-7167. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Commited fix to trunk. Will go and add patches to the hdfs and mr JIRAs in just a minute. > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:39:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42990 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 63465 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63424 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63343 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:39:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:39:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EACB3A5652 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:38:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <869236501.14869.1299890339515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005932#comment-13005932 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7171: ---------------------------------------------- Proposed change: FileContext object should remember the user (UGI) for which it was created, and any AbstractFileSystem object should be created for that user i.e. within a doAs for that user. > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:43:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44612 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 67459 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67418 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67404 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:43:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BA93A573F for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <489378522.14875.1299890579466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7171: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7171.2.patch Patch uploaded. > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7171.2.patch > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:43:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44637 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 67737 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67636 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67600 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:43:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:43:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EECA3A5743 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:42:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1451275095.14879.1299890579582.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7171: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7171.2.patch > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 00:45:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48355 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 00:45:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 00:45:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 69166 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:45:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69136 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 00:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69122 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 00:45:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:45:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:45:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784CF3A57F2 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:44:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <615208354.14886.1299890699489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005934#comment-13005934 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #527 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/527/]) HADOOP-7167. Amend previous commit under this JIRA to fix issue on cygwin. Contributed by Todd Lipcon > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 09:51:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99133 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 09:51:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 09:51:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1735 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 09:51:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1346 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 09:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1090 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 09:51:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:51:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:51:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC9839D7BA for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:50:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1666059415.15299.1299923459503.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006012#comment-13006012 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7177: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #33 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/33/]) HADOOP-7177. svn merge -c 1080797 from trunk > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 11:14:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43002 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 41685 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41652 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41644 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220339ED27 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1104844781.15350.1299928439595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <645678321.2624.1299535019917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7166) DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006026#comment-13006026 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7166: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #628 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/628/]) HADOOP-7166. Add DaemonFactory to common. Contributed by Erik Steffl and jitendra. > DaemonFactory should be moved from HDFS to common > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7166 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7166.1.patch, HADOOP-7166.2.patch > > > DaemonFactory class is defined in hdfs util. common would be a better place for this class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 11:14:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43025 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 41968 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41866 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41770 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8391939ED24 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <357371727.15348.1299928439535.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1359805310.9666.1299717240403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7177) CodecPool should report which compressor it is using MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006025#comment-13006025 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7177: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #628 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/628/]) HADOOP-7177. CodecPool should report which compressor it is using. Contributed by Allen Wittenauer > CodecPool should report which compressor it is using > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7177 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Allen Wittenauer > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7177.txt > > > Certain native compression libraries are overly verbose causing confusion while reading the task logs. Let's actually say which compressor we got when we report it in the task logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 11:14:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43086 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 42123 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42079 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42071 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9860D39ED28 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1982622305.15351.1299928439620.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006027#comment-13006027 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #628 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/628/]) HADOOP-7167. Amend previous commit under this JIRA to fix issue on cygwin. Contributed by Todd Lipcon > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 11:14:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43131 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 11:14:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 42327 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42293 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42285 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:14:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B814E39ED2D for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:13:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <572513074.15356.1299928439750.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006028#comment-13006028 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7156: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #628 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/628/]) HADOOP-7156. Workaround for unsafe implementations of getpwuid_r. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 12 11:42:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34488 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 61243 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61213 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61205 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:42:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:42:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B97C39F715 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:41:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shekhar Gupta (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <171998182.15391.1299930119568.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7185) ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7185 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7185 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Environment: Linux Reporter: Shekhar Gupta -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 13 10:22:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53551 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2011 10:22:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2011 10:22:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 40701 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 10:22:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40675 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 10:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40667 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2011 10:22:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:22:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:22:20 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689963A60AD for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:21:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2135744443.16040.1300011719424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <171998182.15391.1299930119568.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7185) ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006166#comment-13006166 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on HADOOP-7185: ------------------------------------------------- Can you give more details about the problem here? >From the description it seems your streaming job failed because of invalid input path, which is a valid failure. > ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7185 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7185 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Shekhar Gupta > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 13 18:03:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12002 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2011 18:03:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2011 18:03:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 929 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 18:03:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 894 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 18:03:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 886 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2011 18:03:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:03:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DEAR_SOMETHING,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:03:21 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873CC3A782D for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Shekhar Gupta (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2036522478.16304.1300039379550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <171998182.15391.1299930119568.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7185) ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shekhar Gupta updated HADOOP-7185: ---------------------------------- Attachment: rehadoop.zip Dear Sir Thank you for your reply on 'jira'.Here's a complete description of the problem.I have also attached the conf files in case there's some error there. hadoop@shekhar-virtual-machine:~$ /home/hadoop/bin/hadoop jar contrib/streaming/hadoop-0.20.2-streaming.jar -file /home/hadoop/mapper.py -mapper /home/hadoop/mapper.py -file /home/hadoop/reducer.py -reducer /home/hadoop/reducer.py -input /home/hadoop/dfs/data/* -output /home/hadoop/programs/outputpackageJobJar: [/tmp/hadoop/hadoop-unjar2244766030749072387/] [] /tmp/streamjob1080103071461565259.jar tmpDir=null 11/02/24 17:06:16 ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist: hdfs://localhost:54310/home/hadoop/Django-1.1.1/examples/data/Think and Grow Rich!.txt Input path does not exist: hdfs://localhost:54310/home/hadoop/Django-1.1.1/examples/data/Thousand Nights23.txt Input path does not exist: hdfs://localhost:54310/home/hadoop/Django-1.1.1/examples/data/Thousand Nights432].txt Input path does not exist: hdfs://localhost:54310/home/hadoop/Django-1.1.1/examples/data/Thousand Nights65.txt Input path does not exist: hdfs://localhost:54310/home/hadoop/Django-1.1.1/examples/data/Thousand Nights.txt Streaming Job Failed! Best Regards Shekhar Gupta On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA) < > ERROR streaming.StreamJob: Error Launching job : Input path does not exist > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7185 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7185 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Shekhar Gupta > Attachments: rehadoop.zip > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 13 20:58:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56247 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2011 20:58:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2011 20:58:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 10765 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 20:58:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10732 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2011 20:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10724 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2011 20:58:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:58:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:58:22 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3223A7517 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:57:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1342904748.16461.1300049879505.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006276#comment-13006276 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- Package builder design For supporting multiple type of packages, this project layout the packaging source code structure like this: {noformat} src/packages/rpm /deb /conf-pseudo {noformat} rpm - meta data for creating rpm packages. SysV init style startup script is also included for start up process in Redhat like environment. deb - meta data for creating debian packages. BSD init style startup script is also included for start up process in Ubuntu like environment. conf-pseudo - Configuration template for demo pseudo cluster setup. By default both rpm, or deb binary package does not startup the system. The purpose of conf-pseudo is to create a (rpm/deb) package as demonstration of how to setup a single node cluster and turn on services by configuration. Software home directory is designed to locate in: ${prefix}/share/${project} src/packages/update-${project}-env.sh runs in the post installation phase which creates symlinks and making software structure to map to the proposed layout in HADOOP-6255 /etc/default/${project}-evn.sh is symlinked to the project environment script. Hence, project environment variables are shared across projects. Project build file can override the package path in the build phase: Sample build.properties {noformat} package.prefix=/usr package.conf.dir=/etc/${project} package.log.dir=/var/log/${project} package.pid.dir=/var/log/${project} {noformat} For RPM package, it is possible to override location at installation phase by specifying: {noformat} rpm -i ${project}-[version]-[rev].[arch].rpm \ --relocate /usr=/usr/local/hadoop \ --relocate /etc/hadoop=/usr/local/etc/hadoop \ --relocate /var/log/hadoop=/opt/logs/hadoop \ --relocate /var/run/hadoop=/opt/run/hadoop {noformat} The same build structure can be apply to both ant or maven build scripts. It also expandable to include mac native package installer using this design pattern. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.100 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:13:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72255 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:13:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:13:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19129 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:13:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18961 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18952 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:13:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:13:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A463A862C for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:13:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430617657.560.1300108409748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7186) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7186 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7186 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io, ipc Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G In our environment, after 3 days long run Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls. *Thread dump* "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) Looks like we are running into similar issue like this Jetty one. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:21:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94909 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 32054 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31966 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31945 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D15E3A88D3 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1602169021.566.1300108889640.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7178: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:21:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94910 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 32173 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31968 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31946 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:21:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB01B3A88D5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:21:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1373727997.568.1300108889697.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7178: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:25:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13256 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 41589 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41569 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41561 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8EB3A8ADA for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <459330197.578.1300109129642.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7178: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:25:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13465 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 41911 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41870 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41862 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8353A8AD7 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:25:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1115130749.576.1300109129584.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006401#comment-13006401 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7178: --------------------------------------------- Implemented the getVerifyChecksum method in DistributedFileSystem. Provided the patch for the changes in HDFS. So, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch need to be updated in HDFS project. > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 13:46:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82899 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 13:46:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 71291 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71237 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71086 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 13:46:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:46:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:46:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008173A8394 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:46:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7187 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: metrics Environment: Linux Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 15:23:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4627 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 15927 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15901 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15893 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:23:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:23:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908143A862A for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1254924605.947.1300116209588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7188) Chance of Resource Leak in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FsImage. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chance of Resource Leak in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FsImage. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7188 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7188 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Environment: Linux Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G In loadFSEdits method, 1) EditLogFileInputStream edits = new EditLogFileInputStream(NNStorage.getStorageFile(sd, NameNodeFile.EDITS)); numEdits = loader.loadFSEdits(edits); edits.close(); 2) edits = new EditLogFileInputStream(editsNew); numEdits += loader.loadFSEdits(edits); edits.close(); Here if loadFSEdits throws exception then close will not be executed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 15:55:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14631 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 15:55:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 15:55:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 74667 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 15:55:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74391 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 15:55:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74366 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 15:55:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:55:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:55:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109753A8756 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:55:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <162695217.1066.1300118130064.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-7176: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 18:33:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51931 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 82879 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82833 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82825 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012C3A919E for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:33:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2102703747.1479.1300127610062.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006558#comment-13006558 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7175: ------------------------------------- test-contrib: test: compile: test: python.pathcheck: [echo] 'python.home' is not defined. Please pass -Dpython.home= to Ant on the command-line. checkAndRunTests: BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 18:41:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70801 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 95428 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95392 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95384 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:41:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:41:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF6F3A9436 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:41:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1890924886.1499.1300128089909.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-6962: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 19:27:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19293 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 64716 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64691 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64683 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:27:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:27:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16AB3A84DD for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <298964249.1635.1300130849919.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006586#comment-13006586 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6949: ----------------------------------------- This is an important patch. Thanks for doing it in a backward compatible way and also in a way where both on disk format and RPC format can co-exist. Comments: # ArrayPrimitiveWriable #* Class javadoc is not very clear - not sure what you mean by boxed type not supported by ObjectWritable and why that should be mentioned in the javadoc. I am not sure also how clients can provide external locking; more appropriate would be to say, pass a copy of the array, if concurrent modifications are expected. #* Comments related to declaredComponentType is not clear. Can you please add description on what componentType and declaredComponentType are and how they are used, bef adding further description. #* Is PrimitiveArrayWritable a better name? #* Add @InterfaceAudience.Public and @InterfaceStability.Stable #* Throw HadoopIllegalArgumentException instead of NullPointerException and IllegalArgumentException #* Optional: The read write methods could be made static methods in WritableUtils class, so it can be used by others. Also PrimitiveType map, isCanditdatePrimitive() could also move to helper. #* Rename isCandidatePrimitive() to isPrimitive()? #* Is constructor with componentType as argument used any where? #* Some methods could be private - for example - getDeclaredComponentType(), isDeclaredComponentType(), #* Can you use Text instead of UTF8? This avoids deprecation warnings. You could also use WritableUtils to write and read string. This can be done in many other places in the patch. #* I prefer MalformedInputException instead of ProtocolException (see Text.java for example) # ObjectWritable.java #* Can you call set() method while setting instance and declaredClass in #writeObject() method? #* Not sure about the comment: // This case must come after the "isArray()" case #* Not sure why this condition is required in #writeObject() - instance.getClass().getName().equals(declaredClass.getName()) # TestArrayWritable #* In the class javadoc can you add link to PrimitiveArrayWritable? #* Can you make in, out, bigSet, resultSet and expectedSet final? #* Should we prefer reading and writing objects using readFields and writeFields - since they are the methods supporting Writable contract? > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 20:57:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9885 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 20:57:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 20:57:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 55342 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 20:57:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55301 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 20:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55258 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 20:57:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:57:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:57:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CF73A9BC7 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:57:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: security Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 20:59:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10471 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 59002 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58964 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58956 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991C3A9CF2 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1702989770.2044.1300136369953.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Attachment: enable-UGI-debug-example.txt this isn't a patch meant to actually be committed - but just shows the debug setting I'm talking about. This should be made conditional by a Java property or env var. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 21:08:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63593 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 77803 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77768 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77760 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:08:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F75C3A9035 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:08:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1420232843.2072.1300136910256.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006635#comment-13006635 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7189: ------------------------------------------ I agree. This definitely looks like something that should get reformulated so that we could set it for debugging without rebuilding and/or (even worse) restarting the service. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:21:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83519 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 90818 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90784 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90776 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:21:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:21:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8869C3A9691 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:21:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: metrics Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Fix For: 0.20.100 The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:23:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92733 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:23:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 94073 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94002 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93981 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F48D3A9790 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956241619.2248.1300141409649.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7190: ---------------------------------- Attachment: metrics1.patch > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:23:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92904 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 94810 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94777 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94769 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0D43A97A2 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:23:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <859825523.2261.1300141410037.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7190: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:31:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20081 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:31:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:31:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12848 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:31:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12825 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12817 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:31:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:31:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:31:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70553A9A33 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:31:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991480301.2282.1300141889746.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006681#comment-13006681 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7175: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473427/HADOOP-7175-2.patch against trunk revision 1080817. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/309//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/309//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/309//console This message is automatically generated. > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:37:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53109 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19119 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19079 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19071 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:37:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:37:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A0A3A9C3E for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:37:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <525666833.2286.1300142249548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7190: ---------------------------------- Attachment: metrics1.patch I missed a directory (logs/metrics). I've also included the interface classification stuff so that it is available. > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:45:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62276 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:45:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:45:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 24064 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:45:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24030 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24022 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:45:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:45:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:45:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5103A9FA5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:45:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <274609777.2314.1300142731043.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7175: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! (Hudson seems not able to pick up COMMON patches automatically. I have manually started the hudson build.) > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 22:49:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96990 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 28053 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28009 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28001 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:49:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:49:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567B33A90F1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:49:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <551966431.2327.1300142970350.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7190: ---------------------------------- Attachment: metrics1.patch Third try on the various EventCounters. > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.100 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 23:05:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52389 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 47859 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47722 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47706 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14A13A9619 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1411350321.2349.1300143929919.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006703#comment-13006703 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7175: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #528 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/528/]) HADOOP-7175. Add isEnabled() to Trash. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 14 23:45:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54975 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 89877 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89843 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89835 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:45:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:45:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E484A3A91ED for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:45:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1609508724.2457.1300146329932.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006724#comment-13006724 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7190: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm. > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 05:28:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44907 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 05:28:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 05:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 77464 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 05:28:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77372 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 05:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77364 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 05:28:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:28:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:28:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D42C3AA192 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:28:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1732043207.2898.1300166909575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1430617657.560.1300108409748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-7191) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G moved HDFS-1756 to HADOOP-7191: --------------------------------------------------- Component/s: (was: name-node) ipc Key: HADOOP-7191 (was: HDFS-1756) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7191 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > In our environment, after 3 days long run Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls. > *Thread dump* > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like we are running into similar issue like this Jetty one. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 07:01:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59640 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 55552 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55513 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55505 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:01:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3623A94FC for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:01:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: Linux / 0.21 Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria Priority: Trivial Fix For: 0.23.0 The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 11:13:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61792 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 32219 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32180 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32172 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:13:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD34B3AAFC8 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912261929.3368.1300187609837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1409102499.8762.1299697139647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7175) Add isEnabled() to Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006872#comment-13006872 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7175: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #631 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/631/]) HADOOP-7175. Add isEnabled() to Trash. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Add isEnabled() to Trash > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7175 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7175 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7175-2.patch, HADOOP-7175.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > The moveToTrash method returns false in a number of cases. It's not possible to discern if false means an error occurred. In particular, it's not possible to know if the trash is disabled vs. an error occurred. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 15:12:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53631 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7189 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7052 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7044 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:12:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:12:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1883AAA79 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1640434528.3799.1300201949636.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7187: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7187.patch > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 15:14:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54250 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 10714 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10682 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10674 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:14:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0E43AAB7C for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:14:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2082799532.3805.1300202069635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7187: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 16:25:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92769 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 16:25:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 16:25:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 35971 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 16:25:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35944 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 16:25:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35936 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 16:25:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F443AACE6 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:25:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1991335107.3976.1300206329721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1005823317.2243.1300141289555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7190) Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7190: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. > Put metrics v1 back into the hadoop-20-security branch > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7190 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7190 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch, metrics1.patch > > > The metrics v1 code was removed on the branch. It should be put back and deprecated. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 18:21:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58280 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 88269 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88245 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88237 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC82C3AA4B3 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <416799132.4328.1300213289899.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------------- Environment: Linux / 0.20 (was: Linux / 0.21) Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 0.20.3 > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 18:21:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58496 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 88493 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88459 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88451 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CEA3AA4AE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1558378024.4324.1300213289675.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff Doc fixing patch that updates the file system guide. I couldn't provide a Chinese translation, however (I do not know the language, and do not wish to rely on auto translators ;)). Requesting someone who knows the Chinese language to extend the patch. > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.21 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13606-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 18:31:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1698 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 867 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 819 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 811 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 18:31:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:31:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:31:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E21D3AAA0A for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:31:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <824854489.4383.1300213890054.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) English-only, but marking as PA anyway. {code} ant docs {code} passes locally. > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13607-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 20:14:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28191 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 20:14:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 20:14:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 33367 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33333 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33325 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 20:14:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:14:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:14:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68EA3AA064 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:14:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <609291336.4711.1300220069809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007138#comment-13007138 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7183: --------------------------------------- This behavior wasn't changed by HADOOP-6881, so it has been there for a long time. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13608-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 20:30:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80727 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 58620 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58583 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58575 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:30:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:30:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16873AAA70 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:30:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1062942637.4795.1300221029789.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007153#comment-13007153 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7183: --------------------------------------- I'm not very happy with this fix. The implicit contract is that all comparators in the cache must be thread safe. To special case the WritableComparator case because it isn't thread safe seems like the wrong direction. It seems far less brittle to use a thread local buffer for the WritableComparator. Have you actually verified that the shuffle's sorts actually do a get per a thread? > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13609-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 20:50:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64601 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 20:50:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 20:50:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 78396 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:50:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78354 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 20:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78324 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 20:50:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:50:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:50:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1C33AB2DF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1168401473.4873.1300222231889.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007172#comment-13007172 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7183: ------------------------------------- bq. This behavior wasn't changed by HADOOP-6881 It looks to me like it was. Prior to 6881, if nothing was in the cache, it did not "write back" to the cache in WritableComparator.get(). 6881 changed it to add {{comparators.put}} there. bq. Have you actually verified that the shuffle's sorts actually do a get per a thread? Not in the latest shuffle code, but it looked that way to me previously. Using ThreadLocals seems like a reasonable alternate implementation. But we should still make the contract explicit that cached comparators must be threadsafe (yes, it's fairly obvious, but we seem to have missed it ourselves!) > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13610-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 21:02:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88495 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2614 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2590 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2580 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:02:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:02:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46DA3AB6FD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:02:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <28524165.4929.1300222949866.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007180#comment-13007180 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7183: ----------------------------------- Before HADOOP-6881 the only way to add a WritableComparator to the cache was by explicitly calling WritableComparator.define(). HADOOP-6881 changed WritableComparator.get() to add a generic WritableComparator to the comparators cache when there was none registered for the class. This patch simply restores the previous behaviour. Making WritableComparator thread-safe by using a thread-local buffer would be a good enhancement but isn't necessary for this fix. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13611-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 22:12:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13931 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 22:12:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 22:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 33539 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33512 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33504 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 22:12:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:12:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:12:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5A93ABDE5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <579246913.5238.1300227149632.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007228#comment-13007228 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7183: --------------------------------------- {quote} 6881 changed it to add comparators.put there. {quote} Ah, right. Being too efficient. *grin* {quote} Making WritableComparator thread-safe by using a thread-local buffer would be a good enhancement but isn't necessary for this fix. {quote} This fix is brittle precisely because the expectation is that comparators are stateless. It looks like the shuffle doesn't reuse comparators between threads, but it is much much easier to make them thread-safe than ensure that no one puts in such a use case. > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13612-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 23:07:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5083 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 99224 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99194 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99186 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3813ABEAD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942992605.5404.1300230449635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007263#comment-13007263 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------------ - Please use junit 4 (i.e. {{org.junit.Test}} and other classes {{org.junit.*}} instead of {{junit.framework.TestCase}}) - All public classes and methods (except tests) must have javadoc. - How about passing {{minPar}}/{{maxPar}} and {{psize}} to {{NotEnoughArgumentsException}}/{{TooManyArgumentsException}} and then shows the numbers in the error messages? - Minor: how about passing {{pos}} to {{parse(List args)}}, so that we could just return {{parse(Arrays.asList(args), pos)}} in {{parse(String[] args, int pos)}}? > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13613-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 15 23:07:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5128 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 99457 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99423 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99415 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98C33ABEB0 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1374880642.5406.1300230449688.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: fs > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13614-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 05:29:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93566 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 05:29:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 05:29:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 34118 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 05:29:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33938 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 05:29:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33922 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 05:29:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:29:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:29:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F5B3AB996 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:29:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Help message is wrong for touchz command. ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G Priority: Minor Help message for touchz command is -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13615-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 09:52:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63117 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 09:52:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 09:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 55969 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 09:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55903 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 09:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55892 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 09:52:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:52:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED43ABAB2 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:52:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java --------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7194 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Devaraj K {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} try { copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); } finally { if(close) { out.close(); in.close(); } } {code} In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13616-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 20:00:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41309 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 20:00:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 20:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 32236 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32215 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32207 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 20:00:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:00:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:00:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76B53AC0FF for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1520762360.7406.1300305629879.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1919) Add option to allow Binding Jetty to localhost MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007668#comment-13007668 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-1919: ------------------------------------------- What the OP asks for, specifically, is possible by setting the dfs.http.address to localhost:port 'stead of 0.0.0.0. I think this can be closed with that tip. As Raghu pointed out, distcp and hftp services will get affected by this, if being called upon external to the machine -- but nothing else apparently. Perhaps /fsck too will fail if used from a machine other than the NameNode's one. > Add option to allow Binding Jetty to localhost > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.14.0 > Reporter: Thurman Turner > Priority: Minor > > We would like a configurable option to have Jetty bound to the loopback address of the machine so that the dfs-browser is not accessible from outside the host. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13617-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 20:29:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39200 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 89422 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89382 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89374 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:29:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903643ACD09 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:29:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Seigel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <904650912.7471.1300307369586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Seigel updated HADOOP-7193: --------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Release Note: Updated the help for the touchz command. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13618-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 20:31:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45512 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 20:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 20:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89769 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:30:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89738 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 20:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89730 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 20:30:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:30:57 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB25F3ACDB4 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:30:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Seigel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <847002224.7477.1300307435960.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Seigel updated HADOOP-7193: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7193.patch > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13619-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 22:20:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11027 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 65131 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65086 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65078 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:20:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:20:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D4B3AD13D for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <319221702.7659.1300314029679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12359194.193971295977726697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7117) Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007712#comment-13007712 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7117: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12469585/HADOOP-7117.r1.diff against trunk revision 1081598. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/310//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/310//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/310//console This message is automatically generated. > Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7117.r1.diff > > > The following configs are in core-default.xml, but are really read by the Secondary Namenode. These should be moved to hdfs-default.xml for consistency. > > fs.checkpoint.dir > ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/namesecondary > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary images to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the image is > replicated in all of the directories for redundancy. > > > > fs.checkpoint.edits.dir > ${fs.checkpoint.dir} > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary edits to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directoires then teh edits is > replicated in all of the directoires for redundancy. > Default value is same as fs.checkpoint.dir > > > > fs.checkpoint.period > 3600 > The number of seconds between two periodic checkpoints. > > > > fs.checkpoint.size > 67108864 > The size of the current edit log (in bytes) that triggers > a periodic checkpoint even if the fs.checkpoint.period hasn't expired. > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13620-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 22:44:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83047 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 22:44:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 22:44:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 87285 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 22:44:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87240 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 22:44:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87232 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 22:44:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:44:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:44:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9595F3AD636 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:44:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <618389164.7685.1300315469609.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12359194.193971295977726697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7117) Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7117: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 0.21.1 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Harsh! Also thanks Tanping for reviewing it. > Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7117.r1.diff > > > The following configs are in core-default.xml, but are really read by the Secondary Namenode. These should be moved to hdfs-default.xml for consistency. > > fs.checkpoint.dir > ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/namesecondary > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary images to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the image is > replicated in all of the directories for redundancy. > > > > fs.checkpoint.edits.dir > ${fs.checkpoint.dir} > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary edits to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directoires then teh edits is > replicated in all of the directoires for redundancy. > Default value is same as fs.checkpoint.dir > > > > fs.checkpoint.period > 3600 > The number of seconds between two periodic checkpoints. > > > > fs.checkpoint.size > 67108864 > The size of the current edit log (in bytes) that triggers > a periodic checkpoint even if the fs.checkpoint.period hasn't expired. > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13621-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 16 23:04:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72395 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2011 23:04:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2011 23:04:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1014 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 23:04:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 865 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2011 23:04:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 805 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2011 23:04:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:04:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:04:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79203ADAF5 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:04:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1200588029.7719.1300316669683.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12359194.193971295977726697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7117) Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007723#comment-13007723 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7117: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #529 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/529/]) HADOOP-7117. Remove fs.checkpoint.* from core-default.xml and replace fs.checkpoint.* with dfs.namenode.checkpoint.* in documentations. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria > Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7117.r1.diff > > > The following configs are in core-default.xml, but are really read by the Secondary Namenode. These should be moved to hdfs-default.xml for consistency. > > fs.checkpoint.dir > ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/namesecondary > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary images to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the image is > replicated in all of the directories for redundancy. > > > > fs.checkpoint.edits.dir > ${fs.checkpoint.dir} > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary edits to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directoires then teh edits is > replicated in all of the directoires for redundancy. > Default value is same as fs.checkpoint.dir > > > > fs.checkpoint.period > 3600 > The number of seconds between two periodic checkpoints. > > > > fs.checkpoint.size > 67108864 > The size of the current edit log (in bytes) that triggers > a periodic checkpoint even if the fs.checkpoint.period hasn't expired. > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13622-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 01:40:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68561 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 01:40:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 01:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 38162 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 01:40:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38130 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 01:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38088 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 01:40:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:40:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:40:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4F03AD19C for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:40:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kang Xiao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2125066474.8140.1300326029583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7195) RawLocalFileSystem.rename() should not try to do copy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org RawLocalFileSystem.rename() should not try to do copy ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7195 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2 Reporter: Kang Xiao RawLocalFileSystem.rename() try to copy file if fails to call rename of java File. It's really confusing to do copy in a rename interface. For example rename(/a/b/c, /e/f/g) will invoke the copy if /e/f does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13623-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 01:46:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84687 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 01:46:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 01:46:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 44712 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 01:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44679 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 01:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44670 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 01:46:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:46:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:46:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AC83AD2E5 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:46:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kang Xiao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <578506932.8146.1300326389785.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2125066474.8140.1300326029583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7195) RawLocalFileSystem.rename() should not try to do copy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kang Xiao updated HADOOP-7195: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7195.patch attach file for a sulution. > RawLocalFileSystem.rename() should not try to do copy > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7195 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7195 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Kang Xiao > Attachments: HADOOP-7195.patch > > > RawLocalFileSystem.rename() try to copy file if fails to call rename of java File. It's really confusing to do copy in a rename interface. For example rename(/a/b/c, /e/f/g) will invoke the copy if /e/f does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13624-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 10:08:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12639 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 10:08:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 10:08:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8387 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:08:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8216 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8115 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 10:08:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:08:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:08:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12EB3ADB27 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <689968568.8536.1300356509657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12359194.193971295977726697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7117) Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007858#comment-13007858 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7117: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #34 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/34/]) HADOOP-7117. Remove fs.checkpoint.* from core-default.xml and replace fs.checkpoint.* with dfs.namenode.checkpoint.* in documentations. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria > Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7117.r1.diff > > > The following configs are in core-default.xml, but are really read by the Secondary Namenode. These should be moved to hdfs-default.xml for consistency. > > fs.checkpoint.dir > ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/namesecondary > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary images to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the image is > replicated in all of the directories for redundancy. > > > > fs.checkpoint.edits.dir > ${fs.checkpoint.dir} > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary edits to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directoires then teh edits is > replicated in all of the directoires for redundancy. > Default value is same as fs.checkpoint.dir > > > > fs.checkpoint.period > 3600 > The number of seconds between two periodic checkpoints. > > > > fs.checkpoint.size > 67108864 > The size of the current edit log (in bytes) that triggers > a periodic checkpoint even if the fs.checkpoint.period hasn't expired. > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13625-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 10:22:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38440 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 18184 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18095 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18080 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:22:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:22:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926423ADF23 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:22:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Peter Voss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1488021550.8544.1300357349596.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7196) CompressionCodecFactory returns unconfigured GZipCodec if io.compression.codecs is not set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org CompressionCodecFactory returns unconfigured GZipCodec if io.compression.codecs is not set ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7196 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7196 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Peter Voss In case io.compression.codecs property is not set the GZipCodec is added using this code: {code:java} List> codecClasses = getCodecClasses(conf); if (codecClasses == null) { addCodec(new GzipCodec()); addCodec(new DefaultCodec()); } else { Iterator> itr = codecClasses.iterator(); while (itr.hasNext()) { CompressionCodec codec = ReflectionUtils.newInstance(itr.next(), conf); addCodec(codec); } } {code} which leaves GzipCodec unconfigured. If it is set via the {{io.compression.codecs}} property it gets configured properly using ReflectionUtils.newInstance(..., conf). I have seen a lot of NPEs on systems that don't have this property set when using a LineRecordReader (that internally gets the codec from CompressionCodecFactory). I would suggest to use {{org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec,org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DefaultCodec}} as default value for {{io.compression.codecs}}, instead of having another independent code path that deals with the case that this property is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13626-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 11:13:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4931 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 11:13:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 11:13:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70065 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 11:13:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70029 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 11:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70021 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 11:13:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:13:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:13:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB903AD563 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <908985549.8654.1300360409576.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <12359194.193971295977726697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7117) Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007891#comment-13007891 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7117: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #633 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/633/]) HADOOP-7117. Remove fs.checkpoint.* from core-default.xml and replace fs.checkpoint.* with dfs.namenode.checkpoint.* in documentations. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria > Move secondary namenode checkpoint configs from core-default.xml to hdfs-default.xml > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7117.r1.diff > > > The following configs are in core-default.xml, but are really read by the Secondary Namenode. These should be moved to hdfs-default.xml for consistency. > > fs.checkpoint.dir > ${hadoop.tmp.dir}/dfs/namesecondary > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary images to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directories then the image is > replicated in all of the directories for redundancy. > > > > fs.checkpoint.edits.dir > ${fs.checkpoint.dir} > Determines where on the local filesystem the DFS secondary > name node should store the temporary edits to merge. > If this is a comma-delimited list of directoires then teh edits is > replicated in all of the directoires for redundancy. > Default value is same as fs.checkpoint.dir > > > > fs.checkpoint.period > 3600 > The number of seconds between two periodic checkpoints. > > > > fs.checkpoint.size > 67108864 > The size of the current edit log (in bytes) that triggers > a periodic checkpoint even if the fs.checkpoint.period hasn't expired. > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13627-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 22:06:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70776 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 48298 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48265 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48257 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:06:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:06:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91ECE3AE7D4 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:06:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1311101848.10328.1300399589594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7197) Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: util Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Environment: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE Reporter: Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios Priority: Trivial I was trying to add a slave that ran sshd in a non-standard port (eg. 2222 in stead of 22), when I noticed that there was no way to support another port through the configuration for a single node. Supporting a different port for all the slaves is possible through the HADOOP_SSH_OPTS variable, but not for a single slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13628-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 22:08:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71384 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 50297 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50160 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50152 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:08:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:08:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3EA3AE88B for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <532458103.10333.1300399709628.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1311101848.10328.1300399589594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7197) Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios updated HADOOP-7197: --------------------------------------------- Attachment: slaves.sh.patch Changing the IFS variable to the new line permits the inclusion of ssh flags in the slaves file such as -p > Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE > Reporter: Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios > Priority: Trivial > Labels: hadoop > Attachments: slaves.sh.patch > > > I was trying to add a slave that ran sshd in a non-standard port (eg. 2222 in stead of 22), when I noticed that there was no way to support another port through the configuration for a single node. > Supporting a different port for all the slaves is possible through the HADOOP_SSH_OPTS variable, but not for a single slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13629-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 22:26:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17492 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 71216 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71185 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71177 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:26:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:26:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AE03AEE3C for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:26:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <958744213.10366.1300400790458.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1311101848.10328.1300399589594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7197) Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7197: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change] > Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE > Reporter: Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios > Priority: Trivial > Labels: hadoop > Attachments: slaves.sh.patch > > > I was trying to add a slave that ran sshd in a non-standard port (eg. 2222 in stead of 22), when I noticed that there was no way to support another port through the configuration for a single node. > Supporting a different port for all the slaves is possible through the HADOOP_SSH_OPTS variable, but not for a single slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13630-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 22:49:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6139 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 92832 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92788 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92780 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:49:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA74E3AE465 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:49:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <385979528.10392.1300402169760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7180: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7180-2.patch Converted to junit 4, added what I think are the missing javadocs(?), added min/max & expected args to parameter exceptions. I omitted the suggested change to add an index to the list version of parse. The index is present on the old method to skip over ARGV[0] (the command). With the forthcoming changes, the command will be consumed from the list before calling the list-based parse. If it was added, then the sublist/erase would still be required since the list is expected to be destructively modified. If you feel strongly about the index, please let me know. > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13631-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:00:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13594 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:00:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6890 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6839 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6791 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:00:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:00:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:00:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1D53AE803 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:00:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1408567439.10413.1300402830238.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1311101848.10328.1300399589594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7197) Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008206#comment-13008206 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7197: ------------------------------------------ You can change ~/.ssh/config to point to a different port per host. > Support for non-standard ssh port for slaves > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7197 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE > Reporter: Vrachnis Ilias-Dimitrios > Priority: Trivial > Labels: hadoop > Attachments: slaves.sh.patch > > > I was trying to add a slave that ran sshd in a non-standard port (eg. 2222 in stead of 22), when I noticed that there was no way to support another port through the configuration for a single node. > Supporting a different port for all the slaves is possible through the HADOOP_SSH_OPTS variable, but not for a single slave. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13632-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:44:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52641 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:44:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:44:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 48208 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:44:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48153 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47901 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:44:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:44:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:44:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51B53AE43E for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:44:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Philip Zeyliger (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1812341271.10485.1300405469738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7198) Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7198 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7198 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Wish Reporter: Philip Zeyliger Priority: Trivial It turns out (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range) that when you bind to port 0, Linux chooses an ephemeral port. On my default-ridden Ubuntu Maverick box and on CentOS 5.5, that range is 32768-61000. So, when HBase binds to 60030 or when mapReduce binds to 50070, there's a small chance that you'll conflict with, say, an FTP session, or with some other Hadoop daemon that's had a listening address configured as :0. I don't know that there's a practical resolution here, since changing the defaults seems like an ill-fated effort, but if you have any ephemeral port use, you can run into this. We've now run into it once. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13633-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:46:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70017 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:46:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:46:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 51351 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51304 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51232 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:46:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:46:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:46:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F174B3AE50B for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Celina_d=C2=B4_=C3=81vila_Samogin_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <941507774.10495.1300405589985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 08224#comment-13008224 ]=20 Celina d=C2=B4 =C3=81vila Samogin commented on HADOOP-6846: ------------------------------------------------- I have followed the instructions in the README, I have applied these patche= s in 0.22.0 common, and everything has worked fine on my notebook. I have e= dited the tar-munge file and I made =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8Ba few modifications t= o do it. I've installed the generated tarball for version 0.22.0, hadoop da= emons (NameNode, SecondaryNameNode, DataNode, JobTracker, TaskTracker) have= worked well, and it has worked well on my notebook. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13634-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:50:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96210 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 54190 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54149 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54141 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65A3AE6D3 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <752532485.10503.1300405829707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1812341271.10485.1300405469738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7198) Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008226#comment-13008226 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7198: ------------------------------------------ We often run into this problem when the local named caching daemon fires up first. The best solution is to pretty much make sure that Hadoop comes up first or configure the other service to use a limited set of ports. Any port that is picked is going to conflict with *something* when talking above the 1k port line. > Hadoop defaults for web UI ports often fall smack in the middle of Linux ephemeral port range > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7198 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7198 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Wish > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Trivial > > It turns out (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range) that when you bind to port 0, Linux chooses an ephemeral port. On my default-ridden Ubuntu Maverick box and on CentOS 5.5, that range is 32768-61000. So, when HBase binds to 60030 or when mapReduce binds to 50070, there's a small chance that you'll conflict with, say, an FTP session, or with some other Hadoop daemon that's had a listening address configured as :0. > I don't know that there's a practical resolution here, since changing the defaults seems like an ill-fated effort, but if you have any ephemeral port use, you can run into this. We've now run into it once. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13635-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:50:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96225 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 54485 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54357 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54210 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F9D3AE6E1 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:50:30 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Celina_d=C2=B4_=C3=81vila_Samogin_=28JIRA=29?= To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <530267878.10514.1300405830131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 08228#comment-13008228 ]=20 Celina d=C2=B4 =C3=81vila Samogin commented on HADOOP-6846: ------------------------------------------------- I have applied patches from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-63= 42. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13636-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 17 23:54:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97138 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 57093 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56908 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56900 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:54:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:54:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18703AE7A0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:54:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <411176531.10517.1300406069986.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008229#comment-13008229 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7180: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473957/HADOOP-7180-2.patch against trunk revision 1082329. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/311//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/311//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/311//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13637-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 01:48:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72392 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 67447 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67407 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67399 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:48:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:48:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931843AE81B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:48:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2013540870.10791.1300412909599.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------- Priority: Minor (was: Major) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13638-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 01:54:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86955 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 73066 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73036 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73028 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:54:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:54:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833C53AE9F9 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:54:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <97141997.10799.1300413269534.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7180: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13639-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 02:03:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14886 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 79444 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79407 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79399 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:03:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:03:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E9D3AEBDE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:03:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <651263553.10805.1300413809536.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008281#comment-13008281 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7180: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #530 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/530/]) Commit the missing file TestCommandFormat.java for HADOOP-7180. HADOOP-7180. Better support on CommandFormat on the API and exceptions. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13640-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 10:44:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60489 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 10:44:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 10:44:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 99753 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 10:44:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99708 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 10:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99554 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 10:44:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:44:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:44:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB103AFAE1 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:44:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1154895918.11418.1300445069638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7193: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7193.patch > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13641-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 11:13:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61346 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 31123 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31099 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31091 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:13:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:13:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A253AF3BB for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:13:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <634622048.11479.1300446809626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1975706251.11966.1299795239567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7180) Improve CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008398#comment-13008398 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7180: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #634 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/634/]) Commit the missing file TestCommandFormat.java for HADOOP-7180. HADOOP-7180. Better support on CommandFormat on the API and exceptions. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Improve CommandFormat > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7180 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7180 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7180-2.patch, HADOOP-7180.patch > > > CommandFormat currently takes an array and offset for parsing and returns a list of arguments. It'd be much more convenient to have it process a list too. It would also be nice to differentiate between too few and too many args instead of the generic "Illegal number of arguments". Finally, CommandFormat is completely devoid of tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13642-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 11:28:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6677 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 44961 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44918 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44909 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:28:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:28:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC62F3AF869 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:28:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2057547886.11490.1300447709702.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008400#comment-13008400 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7193: --------------------------------------------- Thanks James, Small change in message, HDFS will not write any time stamp in file. Just it will create zero size files and modified/created time as current time. Updated the appropriate message. > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13643-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 17:50:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84434 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 36284 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36263 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36255 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:50:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:50:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3BC3B094B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:50:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1630998659.12221.1300470630964.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-7199) fs -put crash that depends on source file name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE moved HDFS-1768 to HADOOP-7199: ------------------------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: hdfs client) (was: name-node) fs Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) 0.20.2 Key: HADOOP-7199 (was: HDFS-1768) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > fs -put crash that depends on source file name > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Cloudera CDH3B4 in pseudo mode on a Linux 2.6.32-28-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 kernel, with Java HotSpot64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Lars Ailo Bongo > Priority: Minor > > I have a unit test that includes writing a file to HDFS using copyFromLocalFile. Sometimes the function fails due to a checksum error. Once the issue has occurred "hadoop -put " also fails as long as the filename is the same as used in the unit test. The error is due to the file content never being sent to the DataNode, hence the file is size zero. > The error is not due to the file content. The error does not depend on the HDFS destination name. Restarting the NameNode and DataNode does not resolve the issue. I have not been able to reproduce the error with a simple program. I have also not tested the issue in distributed or standalone mode. > The only "fix" is to change the source filename. > Below is error and the NameNode log. There is no entry for this operation in the DataNode log. > /home/larsab/troilkatt2/test-tmp/data>hadoop fs -put status-test.txt status-test.txt3 > 11/03/18 16:59:54 INFO fs.FSInputChecker: Found checksum error: b[512, 968]=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 > org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumException: Checksum error: status-test.txt at 512 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.verifySum(FSInputChecker.java:277) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.readChecksumChunk(FSInputChecker.java:241) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read1(FSInputChecker.java:189) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read(FSInputChecker.java:158) > at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.copyBytes(IOUtils.java:49) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.copyBytes(IOUtils.java:87) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.copy(FileUtil.java:224) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.copy(FileUtil.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile(FileSystem.java:1283) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.copyFromLocal(FsShell.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.run(FsShell.java:1817) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.main(FsShell.java:1960) > put: Checksum error: status-test.txt at 512 > NAMENODE > 2011-03-18 16:59:54,422 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Number of transactions: 13 Total time for transactions(ms): 1Number of transactions batched in Syncs: 0 Number of syncs: 7 SyncTimes(ms): 220 > 2011-03-18 16:59:54,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=larsab ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=create src=/user/larsab/status-test.txt3 dst=null perm=larsab:supergroup:rw-r--r-- > 2011-03-18 16:59:54,469 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: Removing lease on file /user/larsab/status-test.txt3 from client DFSClient_-1004170418 > 2011-03-18 16:59:54,469 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: DIR* NameSystem.completeFile: file /user/larsab/status-test.txt3 is closed by DFSClient_-1004170418 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13644-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 18:04:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30690 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 60342 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60305 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60297 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:04:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:04:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4303B0E12 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:04:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Ailo Bongo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1694939217.12276.1300471469845.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7199) Checksum file check MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Ailo Bongo updated HADOOP-7199: ------------------------------------ Description: copyFromLocalFile crashes if a cheksum file exists on the local filesystem and the checksum does not match the file content. This will for example crash "hadoop -fs put ./foo ./foo" with a non-descriptive error. It is therefore not possible to do: 1. copyToLocalFile(hdfsFile, localFile) // creates checksum file 2. modify localFile 3. copyFromLocalFile(localFile, hdfsFile) // uses old checksum Solution: do not reuse checksum files, or add a parameter to copyFromLocalFile that specifies that checksum files should not be reused. was: I have a unit test that includes writing a file to HDFS using copyFromLocalFile. Sometimes the function fails due to a checksum error. Once the issue has occurred "hadoop -put " also fails as long as the filename is the same as used in the unit test. The error is due to the file content never being sent to the DataNode, hence the file is size zero. The error is not due to the file content. The error does not depend on the HDFS destination name. Restarting the NameNode and DataNode does not resolve the issue. I have not been able to reproduce the error with a simple program. I have also not tested the issue in distributed or standalone mode. The only "fix" is to change the source filename. Below is error and the NameNode log. There is no entry for this operation in the DataNode log. /home/larsab/troilkatt2/test-tmp/data>hadoop fs -put status-test.txt status-test.txt3 11/03/18 16:59:54 INFO fs.FSInputChecker: Found checksum error: b[512, 968]=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 org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumException: Checksum error: status-test.txt at 512 at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.verifySum(FSInputChecker.java:277) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.readChecksumChunk(FSInputChecker.java:241) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read1(FSInputChecker.java:189) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read(FSInputChecker.java:158) at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:83) at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.copyBytes(IOUtils.java:49) at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.copyBytes(IOUtils.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.copy(FileUtil.java:224) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.copy(FileUtil.java:170) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.copyFromLocalFile(FileSystem.java:1283) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.copyFromLocal(FsShell.java:134) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.run(FsShell.java:1817) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FsShell.main(FsShell.java:1960) put: Checksum error: status-test.txt at 512 NAMENODE 2011-03-18 16:59:54,422 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Number of transactions: 13 Total time for transactions(ms): 1Number of transactions batched in Syncs: 0 Number of syncs: 7 SyncTimes(ms): 220 2011-03-18 16:59:54,444 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.audit: ugi=larsab ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=create src=/user/larsab/status-test.txt3 dst=null perm=larsab:supergroup:rw-r--r-- 2011-03-18 16:59:54,469 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: Removing lease on file /user/larsab/status-test.txt3 from client DFSClient_-1004170418 2011-03-18 16:59:54,469 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: DIR* NameSystem.completeFile: file /user/larsab/status-test.txt3 is closed by DFSClient_-1004170418 Summary: Checksum file check (was: fs -put crash that depends on source file name) > Checksum file check > -------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Cloudera CDH3B4 in pseudo mode on a Linux 2.6.32-28-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 kernel, with Java HotSpot64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Lars Ailo Bongo > Priority: Minor > > copyFromLocalFile crashes if a cheksum file exists on the local filesystem and the checksum does not match the file content. This will for example crash "hadoop -fs put ./foo ./foo" with a non-descriptive error. > It is therefore not possible to do: > 1. copyToLocalFile(hdfsFile, localFile) // creates checksum file > 2. modify localFile > 3. copyFromLocalFile(localFile, hdfsFile) // uses old checksum > Solution: do not reuse checksum files, or add a parameter to copyFromLocalFile that specifies that checksum files should not be reused. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13645-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 18:06:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39809 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 61085 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61032 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61010 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:06:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:06:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01883B0EF5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:06:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Ailo Bongo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <80917034.12287.1300471589848.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7199) Crash due to reuse of checksum files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Ailo Bongo updated HADOOP-7199: ------------------------------------ Summary: Crash due to reuse of checksum files (was: Checksum file check ) > Crash due to reuse of checksum files > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Cloudera CDH3B4 in pseudo mode on a Linux 2.6.32-28-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 kernel, with Java HotSpot64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Lars Ailo Bongo > Priority: Minor > > copyFromLocalFile crashes if a cheksum file exists on the local filesystem and the checksum does not match the file content. This will for example crash "hadoop -fs put ./foo ./foo" with a non-descriptive error. > It is therefore not possible to do: > 1. copyToLocalFile(hdfsFile, localFile) // creates checksum file > 2. modify localFile > 3. copyFromLocalFile(localFile, hdfsFile) // uses old checksum > Solution: do not reuse checksum files, or add a parameter to copyFromLocalFile that specifies that checksum files should not be reused. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13646-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 18:08:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40310 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 18:08:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 18:08:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 66276 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:08:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66162 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 18:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66146 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 18:08:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:08:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:08:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CEE3B009B for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Ailo Bongo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1508388708.12292.1300471709814.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7199) Crash due to reuse of checksum files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008553#comment-13008553 ] Lars Ailo Bongo commented on HADOOP-7199: ----------------------------------------- Title and description have been updated. > Crash due to reuse of checksum files > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7199 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Cloudera CDH3B4 in pseudo mode on a Linux 2.6.32-28-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 kernel, with Java HotSpot64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Lars Ailo Bongo > Priority: Minor > > copyFromLocalFile crashes if a cheksum file exists on the local filesystem and the checksum does not match the file content. This will for example crash "hadoop -fs put ./foo ./foo" with a non-descriptive error. > It is therefore not possible to do: > 1. copyToLocalFile(hdfsFile, localFile) // creates checksum file > 2. modify localFile > 3. copyFromLocalFile(localFile, hdfsFile) // uses old checksum > Solution: do not reuse checksum files, or add a parameter to copyFromLocalFile that specifies that checksum files should not be reused. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13647-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 19:42:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31053 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 73774 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73748 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73740 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:42:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC793B0E75 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1769482377.12548.1300477349569.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1070422412.13998.1299867359451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7182) remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7182: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7182-cleanup.patch Removes stub implementation per spec. > remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7182 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7182 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7182-cleanup.patch > > > This is the third part of a refactoring of HardLink: > 1. HADOOP-7133 moved HardLink from an inner class of FileUtil to a stand-alone class, but left a stub class in FileUtil to prevent breaking clients in HDFS. > 2. HDFS-1445 changes the clients in HDFS to point at the new implementation. > 3. After HDFS-1445 is committed, this ticket is to clean up the code by removing the backward-compatibility stub. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13648-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 19:44:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32346 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 76080 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76044 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76035 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:44:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:44:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5A93B0F09 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:44:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1514128598.12551.1300477469563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1070422412.13998.1299867359451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7182) remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7182: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > remove stub implementation of HardLink from FileUtil, after fixing any remaining dependencies > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7182 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7182 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7182-cleanup.patch > > > This is the third part of a refactoring of HardLink: > 1. HADOOP-7133 moved HardLink from an inner class of FileUtil to a stand-alone class, but left a stub class in FileUtil to prevent breaking clients in HDFS. > 2. HDFS-1445 changes the clients in HDFS to point at the new implementation. > 3. After HDFS-1445 is committed, this ticket is to clean up the code by removing the backward-compatibility stub. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13649-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 18 21:49:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62659 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 17857 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17815 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:49:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:49:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAAE3B0383 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:49:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <181890699.12828.1300484969638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7200) Hudson should cover fault inject compilation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hudson should cover fault inject compilation --------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7200 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7200 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Eli Collins Currently Hudson (and test-patch) do not catch changes that create compilation errors in the fault injection tests. We should fix that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13650-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 19 00:20:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16669 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 48012 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47980 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47972 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:20:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:20:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E87F3B0863 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:20:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1250121198.13206.1300494029646.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------- Attachment: arrayprim_v7.patch # ArrayPrimitiveWriable * Class javadoc is not very clear - not sure what you mean by boxed type not supported by ObjectWritable and why that should be mentioned in the javadoc. I am not sure also how clients can provide external locking; more appropriate would be to say, pass a copy of the array, if concurrent modifications are expected. Javadoc comments simplified. * Comments related to declaredComponentType is not clear. Can you please add description on what componentType and declaredComponentType are and how they are used, bef adding further description. Provided. * Is PrimitiveArrayWritable a better name? By common usage, "PrimitiveArrayWritable" would imply a sub-class of ArrayWritable, which this isn't. So I thought it best to use a different word order. * Add @InterfaceAudience.Public and @InterfaceStability.Stable Done. * Throw HadoopIllegalArgumentException instead of NullPointerException and IllegalArgumentException Done. * Optional: The read write methods could be made static methods in WritableUtils class, so it can be used by others. Also PrimitiveType map, isCanditdatePrimitive() could also move to helper. After discussion, we agreed there is no benefit in efficiency or code clarity, so no change in this regard. * Rename isCandidatePrimitive() to isPrimitive()? Agreed. Originally, isCandidatePrimitive() provided a layer of indirection so that ArrayPrimitiveWritable didn't have to contract to support ALL primitive types. However, since it ended up supporting them all, the distinction is irrelevant. Changed to use Class.isPrimitive(). * Is constructor with componentType as argument used any where? No, it is provided to make ArrayPrimitiveWritable more generally useful. * Some methods could be private - for example - getDeclaredComponentType(), isDeclaredComponentType(), No, if the user elects to use the typechecking capabilities of declaredComponentType, he should be able to make both of these queries. * Can you use Text instead of UTF8? This avoids deprecation warnings. You could also use WritableUtils to write and read string. This can be done in many other places in the patch. I do not want to change the usage from that of ObjectWritable. Essentially all our Writable classes use UTF8. If we want to change that, please open a different Jira. * I prefer MalformedInputException instead of ProtocolException (see Text.java for example) I agree ProtocolException isn't exactly right. Problem with MalformedInputException: it doesn't take a "message" argument, only an integer, so we can't use that. Changed to just use IOException, since that's what most of the Writable code uses. ========== # ObjectWritable.java * Can you call set() method while setting instance and declaredClass in #writeObject() method? My understanding is that ObjectWritable.writeObject() is a static method that does not instantiate an ObjectWritable instance. The variables "instance" and "declaredClass" are both local variables in #writeObject() context. So calling the non-static "set()" would not be okay. * Not sure about the comment: // This case must come after the "isArray()" case You're right, it's not order-dependent since it uses /if/else if/else/ rather than a sequence of "if"s. Removed the comment. * Not sure why this condition is required in #writeObject() - instance.getClass().getName().equals(declaredClass.getName()) I'm being paranoid. There can be a range of behaviors if declaredClass isn't exactly the same as instance.getClass(), so I'm refusing to allowCompactArrays if the caller isn't declaring the true type. ========== # TestArrayPrimitiveWritable * In the class javadoc can you add link to PrimitiveArrayWritable? Done. Good catch. * Can you make in, out, bigSet, resultSet and expectedSet final? Sure. * Should we prefer reading and writing objects using readFields and writeFields - since they are the methods supporting Writable contract? For "normal" i/o I do use readFields() and write(). Then I test to see that the wire format is as expected, by going around those methods and directly invoking lower-level functionality. I think this is the only way to get confidence in the wire format encoders and decoders. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13651-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 19 03:16:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75618 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2011 03:16:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2011 03:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 60425 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 03:16:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60264 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 03:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60256 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2011 03:16:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 03:16:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 03:16:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AE53B027B for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 03:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 03:16:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1069306489.13356.1300504582593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <26581586.62081293647746870.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7080) Documentation dfs.block.size where dfs.blocksize has to be used instead. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008720#comment-13008720 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7080: ------------------------------------- A potential issue here is that the dfs.block.size deprecation is done in HdfsConfiguration, so if somone is using just using the Configuration object the deprecated config won't work. > Documentation dfs.block.size where dfs.blocksize has to be used instead. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7080 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7080 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux (Ubuntu) > Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise > Priority: Minor > > The configuration for the block size is named *dfs.block.size* in the [documentation for Release 0.21.0 of Hadoop|http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.21.0/cluster_setup.html] but this will not work nor will it be recognized. If i use [*dfs.blocksize*|http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/current/api/constant-values.html] instead it will work perfectly. So this seemed to be a documentation bug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13652-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 19 21:42:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72842 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2011 21:42:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2011 21:42:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14589 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 21:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14563 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2011 21:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14555 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2011 21:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:42:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3243B196E for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:42:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1138256086.13880.1300570949583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1799619354.3818.1299567419614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-7172) SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008833#comment-13008833 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7172: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473024/hadoop-7172.txt against trunk revision 1082788. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/312//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/312//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/312//console This message is automatically generated. > SecureIO should not check owner on non-secure clusters that have no native support > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7172 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io, security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7172.txt, hadoop-7172.txt, hadoop-7172.txt > > > The SecureIOUtils.openForRead function currently uses a racy stat/open combo if security is disabled and the native libraries are not available. This ends up shelling out to "ls -ld" which is very very slow. We've seen this cause significant performance regressions on clusters that match this profile. > Since the racy permissions check doesn't buy us any security anyway, we should just fall back to a normal "open" without any stat() at all, if we can't use the native support to do it efficiently. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13653-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 20 00:52:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88658 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 13656 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13617 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13609 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:52:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:52:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9989E4003FE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:52:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1375189809.14004.1300582349625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-7201) Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7201 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: Jonathan Ellis Priority: Minor Fix For: site Cassandra provides native read/write support for java Hadoop jobs (with locality), Streaming, Pig, and Hive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13654-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 20 00:54:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89256 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2011 00:54:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2011 00:54:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15900 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 00:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15871 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 00:54:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15857 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2011 00:54:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:54:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:54:51 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DC140046D for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:54:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1953322961.14009.1300582469676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1375189809.14004.1300582349625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-7201) Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Ellis updated HADOOP-7201: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7201.txt Patch to add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache > Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7201 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Ellis > Priority: Minor > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-7201.txt > > > Cassandra provides native read/write support for java Hadoop jobs (with locality), Streaming, Pig, and Hive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13655-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 20 20:52:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82881 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 65704 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65664 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 20:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65656 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2011 20:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042D43AD3E0 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:52:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ian Holsman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <263583017.77.1300654326013.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1375189809.14004.1300582349625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7201) Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13008968#comment-13008968 ] Ian Holsman commented on HADOOP-7201: ------------------------------------- done. can someone please close this. I don't have the privs. > Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7201 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Ellis > Priority: Minor > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-7201.txt > > > Cassandra provides native read/write support for java Hadoop jobs (with locality), Streaming, Pig, and Hive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13656-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 20 21:24:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80893 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 96969 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96898 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96888 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DDD3AD93D for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:24:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1215655756.86.1300656246077.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1375189809.14004.1300582349625.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7201) Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Ellis resolved HADOOP-7201. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Jonathan Ellis Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] resolved, thanks! > Add Cassandra to list of Hadoop-related projects at Apache > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7201 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7201 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Ellis > Assignee: Jonathan Ellis > Priority: Minor > Fix For: site > > Attachments: HADOOP-7201.txt > > > Cassandra provides native read/write support for java Hadoop jobs (with locality), Streaming, Pig, and Hive. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13657-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 18:31:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72543 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 18:31:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 18:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 84110 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:31:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83489 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83254 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 18:31:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:31:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:31:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86EE402B97 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:31:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Improve Command base class -------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7202 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.23.0 Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13658-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 18:39:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2904 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 90431 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90403 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90395 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94A1402E52 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1665067263.1530.1300732745821.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13659-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 18:39:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2972 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90956 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90910 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90902 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE31402E50 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <442631814.1528.1300732745766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7202.patch Add many methods to Command class to facilitate easy overriding for custom behavior. Add PathData class to encapsulate a path, fs, and filestatus to avoid passing so many args and/or multiple lookups during execution. Modify Count cmd to conform since it was the simplest one. (Note: changes in FsShell are temporary, since all the if/then/elses for commands will soon become a generic call to a command object.) > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13660-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 20:03:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42687 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 20:03:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 20:03:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 14948 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14841 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14833 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 20:03:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:03:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:03:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B2837A4D for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Anastasis Andronidis (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <780376861.1879.1300737785806.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7203) Folder Paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Folder Paths ------------ Key: HADOOP-7203 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7203 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: Mac OS X (but the same effect in linux) $java -version java version "1.6.0_24" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07-334-10M3326) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02-334, mixed mode) Reporter: Anastasis Andronidis Priority: Minor I tried to execute: ./bin/hadoop namenode -format in hadoop-0.21.0 inside a folder with path: ~/Desktop/my test/hadoop-0.21.0/ But i kept receiving the following error: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: test/hadoop-0/21/0/bin////logs Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: me.hadoop-0.21.0.bin....logs at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) Tried to change the language just to test what would happen. So I got a same error with a folder name with spaces: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: ?????? Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: ?????? at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248) (You can notice the ???, might this be a java issue?) I was able to run it only in folder names that didn't include spaces. Both english and greek. I tried to trace this issue and I found that the problem is in the HADOOP_HOME/hdfs script. On the last line where: exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $HADOOP_OPTS $CLASS "$@" tries to be executed, variable HADOOP_OPTS has white spaces which produce the above errors. A solution to this problem could be to include double quotes to each path when they are collected and call exec command with eval at the front. I found a workaround to this issue by adding: tmp=`echo ${HADOOP_OPTS// /\\\ }` eval exec "$JAVA" $JAVA_HEAP_MAX $(echo ${tmp//\\ \-/\ \-}) " " $CLASS "$@" This code basically it added backslashes in front of each space in a path. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13661-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 20:20:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86216 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 47144 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47121 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47113 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:20:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:20:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC9E37FF4 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:20:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2005010112.1924.1300738807257.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13662-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 20:22:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96699 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 50906 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50875 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50867 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:22:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:22:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D85360E0 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1513571876.1938.1300738925802.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13663-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 20:42:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57725 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 89218 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89153 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89145 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:42:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:42:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61E93681C for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:42:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1242547691.2024.1300740126808.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009359#comment-13009359 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6949: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474048/arrayprim_v7.patch against trunk revision 1082788. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/315//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/315//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/315//console This message is automatically generated. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13664-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 20:44:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58538 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 20:44:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 20:44:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 96031 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:44:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95990 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 20:44:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95982 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 20:44:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:44:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:44:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B2136912 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:44:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <434009500.2115.1300740247016.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009362#comment-13009362 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6949: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13665-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 21:16:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65249 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 21:16:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 21:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 54812 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 21:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54693 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 21:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54685 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 21:16:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:16:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4D137F7E for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:16:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <502896594.2365.1300742171107.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Increments the RPC protocol version in org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server from 4 to 5. Introduces ArrayPrimitiveWritable for a much more efficient wire format to transmit arrays of primitives over RPC. ObjectWritable uses the new writable for array of primitives for RPC and continues to use existing format for on-disk data. was: Increments the RPC protocol version in org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server from 4 to 5. Introduces a much more efficient wire format to transmit arrays of primitives. This is done in a way that is 100% backward compatible with previously persisted data, so any stored data will still be readable. However, data written in the new version cannot be read by a process using the old version of protocol. Only RPC uses the new format; file writing protocols for application data are unchanged.. Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed the patch. Thank you Matt. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13666-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 21:24:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5104 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 68087 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68062 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68054 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:24:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E337B36203 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1485558788.2387.1300742645927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009393#comment-13009393 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6949: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #531 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/531/]) HADOOP-6949. Reduce RPC packet size of primitive arrays using ArrayPrimitiveWritable instead of ObjectWritable. Contributed by Matt Foley. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13667-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 22:27:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6114 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 22:27:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 22:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 75951 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 22:27:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75833 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 22:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75760 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 22:27:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:27:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:27:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DDF41439 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:27:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7204 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Boris Shkolnik Assignee: Boris Shkolnik Priority: Minor -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13668-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 21 22:29:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6617 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 22:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 22:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 78394 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 22:29:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78339 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 22:29:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78266 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 22:29:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:29:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:29:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA27A414D2 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1835020432.2687.1300746545824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-7204: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7204.patch > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13669-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 04:55:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56774 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 04:55:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 04:55:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 97576 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 04:55:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97552 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 04:55:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97543 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 04:55:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:55:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:55:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C141B05 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:55:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "thron_xv (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1503956360.3231.1300769705738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6953) start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009550#comment-13009550 ] thron_xv commented on HADOOP-6953: ---------------------------------- To avoid this issue, you can configure HADOOP_HOME in environment. For example in Cygwin, just do as below: export HADOOP_HOME=/cygdrive/c/hadoop/ > start-{dfs,mapred}.sh scripts fail if HADOOP_HOME is not set > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6953 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6953 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > > If the HADOOP_HOME environment variable is not set then the start and stop scripts for HDFS and MapReduce fail with "Hadoop common not found.". The start-all.sh and stop-all.sh scripts are not affected. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13670-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 11:13:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69898 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 11:13:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 11:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 12583 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 11:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12532 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12524 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF774101B for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1580428621.3583.1300792386127.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009615#comment-13009615 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6949: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #638 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/638/]) HADOOP-6949. Reduce RPC packet size of primitive arrays using ArrayPrimitiveWritable instead of ObjectWritable. Contributed by Matt Foley. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13671-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 16:23:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75675 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 16:23:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 16:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 18599 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 16:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18374 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 16:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18357 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 16:23:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:23:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:23:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8D642E6C for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1908839080.4012.1300810985777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-5983: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13672-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:16:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34495 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 49604 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49579 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49571 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:16:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:16:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB44B42AD0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:16:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <63224446.4256.1300817765829.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009754#comment-13009754 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7204: ---------------------------------------------- Patch looks good to me. +1 None of the changed methods are public, however it would be good to compile Hdfs and map-reduce with this change, just to make sure. > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13673-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:34:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23564 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:34:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:34:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 82630 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82573 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82509 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:34:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:34:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:34:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA6F42267 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:34:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7205 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.23.0 OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13674-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:36:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33089 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 87478 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87435 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87427 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42007423BA for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <656437407.4324.1300818966266.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7205: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7205.patch > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13675-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:36:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33228 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 88023 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87968 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87885 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7022423B0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1713106700.4314.1300818965942.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-7204: ----------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13676-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:36:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33263 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 88446 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88403 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88395 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C85423AD for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <74567979.4312.1300818965880.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7205: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7205.patch > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13677-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:36:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33333 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 88793 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88761 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88753 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A2E423B2 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <807806642.4316.1300818966015.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7205: -------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7205.patch) > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13678-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:37:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33865 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:37:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:37:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 90902 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:37:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90864 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:37:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90834 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:37:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:37:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:37:04 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09E423BB for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1120004810.4325.1300818966312.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7205: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13679-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:38:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35432 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:38:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:38:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 822 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 788 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 780 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:38:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:38:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363BF424B1 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:38:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1843026161.4331.1300819086219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009770#comment-13009770 ] Boris Shkolnik commented on HADOOP-7204: ---------------------------------------- compiled hdfs and mr with the change(jar-test). All compiled. > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13680-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:54:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83264 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 32877 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32814 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32795 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D4642BBB for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:54:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1637655371.4376.1300820046155.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009783#comment-13009783 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-5983: ------------------------------------- I cannot reproduce on trunk. I am unable to find references to the mapred config in the namenode code. To verify, I created a mapred-site.xml and local-mapred-site.xml with syntax errors. The namenode starts w/o a problem. > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13681-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 18:56:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84032 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 40008 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39972 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39960 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:56:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:56:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C534D42C93 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:56:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <648731709.4384.1300820165804.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp resolved HADOOP-5983. --------------------------------- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13682-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 19:04:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26908 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 19:04:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 19:04:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 55538 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 19:04:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55442 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 19:04:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55144 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 19:04:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:04:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:04:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70E44205E for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:04:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1011960141.4409.1300820645746.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009788#comment-13009788 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7205: ------------------------------------------ -1 a) We've been avoiding OS-specific changes in the shells for a very long time, including one to autodetect Java on various Linux distributions. I see no reason to reverse this now. I've said it before and I'll say it again: stuff like this should really go into an installer that modifies hadoop-env.sh, not part of the base executable. b) Given that Java is moving from Apple controlled to Oracle controlled on OS X, there is a very good chance this command will disappear in a future release. > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13683-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 19:06:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37957 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 57078 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57049 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57037 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:06:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:06:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D84214B for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:06:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1272532877.4413.1300820765805.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Allen Wittenauer updated HADOOP-7205: ------------------------------------- Priority: Trivial (was: Major) > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13684-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 20:36:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23123 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 20:36:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 19373 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19348 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55012 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 12:05:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Message-ID: <4D88904D.6010006@orkash.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0530 From: Manish Yadav User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop pipes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi every body out there I use wordcount.cpp code in hadoop, in the code of wordcount.cpp in map function i just add too extra line add two lines system("clear"); and cout<<"hello world"; just for experimentation purpose. now the code is complied successfully ,but when i run it it create problems . It does not produce the desires result. In my out put i does not found "hello world"or not the screen of my system being cleared why it is so? why these statement are not executing(running)? what should I do to get my desired result? where I should put these two line in the code so that they can be executed ? I put them in main function too but they are not still responding, Please tell me what should I do to use these two statement ? From common-issues-return-13685-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 20:36:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23172 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 20:36:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19606 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19568 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 20:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95037 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 12:44:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Message-ID: <4D8899AD.6000406@orkash.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:14:29 +0530 From: Manish Yadav User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Hadoop configuration Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi everybody i configured the hadoop in pseuo distrubution mode on my ubuntu . In the start it work goog but now i'm facing a strange problem my name node doesnot start . when i use the command bin/start-all.sh it shows msg starting namenode but when i tried to close by the command bin/stop-all.sh than it shows localhost: no tasktracker to stop no namenode to stop when i check the log file i didn't understand what it is here is the out put of my log file ************************************************************/ 2011-03-11 17:53:34,901 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: STARTUP_MSG: /************************************************************ STARTUP_MSG: Starting NameNode STARTUP_MSG: host = ws40-man-lin/192.168.0.133 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.0 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/core/branches/branch-0.20 -r 763504; compiled by 'ndaley' on Thu Apr 9 05:18:40 UTC 2009 ************************************************************/ 2011-03-11 17:53:35,545 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.metrics.RpcMetrics: Initializing RPC Metrics with hostName=NameNode, port=8020 2011-03-11 17:53:35,557 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: Namenode up at: localhost/127.0.0.1:8020 2011-03-11 17:53:35,577 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Initializing JVM Metrics with processName=NameNode, sessionId=null 2011-03-11 17:53:35,579 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.NameNodeMetrics: Initializing NameNodeMeterics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2011-03-11 17:53:35,748 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: fsOwner=hadoop,hadoop 2011-03-11 17:53:35,749 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: supergroup=supergroup 2011-03-11 17:53:35,749 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: isPermissionEnabled=true 2011-03-11 17:53:35,757 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.FSNamesystemMetrics: Initializing FSNamesystemMetrics using context object:org.apache.hadoop.metrics.spi.NullContext 2011-03-11 17:53:35,758 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Registered FSNamesystemStatusMBean 2011-03-11 17:53:35,825 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Storage directory /tmp/hadoop-hadoop/dfs/name does not exist. 2011-03-11 17:53:35,827 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: FSNamesystem initialization failed. org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.InconsistentFSStateException: Directory /tmp/hadoop-hadoop/dfs/name is in an inconsistent state: storage directory does not exist or is not accessible. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage.java:290) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem.java:302) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:283) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:201) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:955) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:964) 2011-03-11 17:53:35,829 INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Stopping server on 8020 2011-03-11 17:53:35,830 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.InconsistentFSStateException: Directory /tmp/hadoop-hadoop/dfs/name is in an inconsistent state: storage directory does not exist or is not accessible. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSImage.recoverTransitionRead(FSImage.java:290) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSDirectory.loadFSImage(FSDirectory.java:87) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.initialize(FSNamesystem.java:302) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:283) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:201) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:279) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:955) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:964) 2011-03-11 17:53:35,830 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down NameNode at ws40-man-lin/192.168.0.133 ************************************************************/ please tell me what should i do to run my hadoop correctly? From common-issues-return-13686-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 21:44:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16377 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 13757 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13718 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13710 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:44:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:44:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EAE42239 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:44:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <541340500.4740.1300830245807.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009852#comment-13009852 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7205: ------------------------------------- Point taken, I understand the concern, and I was not aware of this policy. I was following the motto "when in Rome, do as the Romans do". It's a standard practice on OS X to use java_home to get the user's selected jvm. The release notes that announce the deprecation of apple's jvms recommends the use of java_home so it's unlikely to disappear(*). If the command did disappear, nothing would break with this patch. Since I'm not aware of history of this policy, may I suggest that the env script sources another env script (only if it exists) that is determined based on uname? That will compartmentalize os specific logic while retaining certain luxuries expected on each OS. (*)http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#releasenotes/Java/JavaSnowLeopardUpdate3LeopardUpdate8RN/NewandNoteworthy/NewandNoteworthy.html > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13687-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 22:36:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7068 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 22:36:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 22:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 87361 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:36:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87326 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:36:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87318 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 22:36:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:36:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:36:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00016424FC for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <409088782.4837.1300833365996.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009876#comment-13009876 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7204: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474243/HADOOP-7204.patch against trunk revision 1083957. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/316//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/316//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/316//console This message is automatically generated. > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13688-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 22:58:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55959 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8533 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8493 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8485 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA3542E0A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <327372915.4900.1300834685847.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7171: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7171.2.patch > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13689-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 22:58:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55981 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8799 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8710 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8549 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEA442E0D for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <294378712.4902.1300834685897.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <995627871.3214.1299545460554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7171) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7171: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7171.2.patch > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13690-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 22 23:46:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16034 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 53019 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52992 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52984 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:46:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:46:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD77842AA3 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:46:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Integrate Snappy compression ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7206 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Eli Collins Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. {quote} Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13691-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 00:14:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2838 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 00:14:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 00:14:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74591 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74554 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74546 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 00:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4705423CF for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:14:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <524968875.5009.1300839245735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009921#comment-13009921 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7204: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #532 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/532/]) HADOOP-7204. remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13692-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 00:30:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60767 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 00:30:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 00:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 89337 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:30:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89145 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89137 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 00:30:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:30:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAB442867 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:30:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <896507162.5037.1300840205896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-7204: ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) committed to trunk > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13693-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 00:32:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73757 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 00:32:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 00:32:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 89951 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89687 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 00:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89674 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 00:32:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:32:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:32:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EEF428F4 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:32:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1723498609.5040.1300840326140.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7207) fs member of FSShell is not really needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 fs member of FSShell is not really needed ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7207 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7207 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Boris Shkolnik Assignee: Boris Shkolnik FileSystem object should be created on demand when needed in FSShell, instead of always creating one that connects to the default FileSystem. It will also solve a problem of connecting to non-existant/non-functional default, when it is not really needed for this run. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13694-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 01:22:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38374 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 42665 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42613 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42605 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:22:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08642698 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:22:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <606271582.5149.1300843325959.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009942#comment-13009942 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Do you think we should integrate it into Hadoop proper, or start a separate project to implement it as a pluggable codec? The advantage of doing it as a separate project is that we could provide it for existing Hadoop versions without having to re-release Hadoop. Also allows for quicker bug fixes and granular upgrades when issues are identified. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13695-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 14:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44301 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 14:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 14:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 4942 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 14:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4888 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 14:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4875 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 14:50:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF87434A2 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. private Map clients = new HashMap(); Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13696-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 18:59:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50439 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 18:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 18:59:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 64422 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:12:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64386 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:12:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64378 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:12:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:12:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:12:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA103463D0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:12:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1348834288.6536.1300900325955.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010228#comment-13010228 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------- Looks good. Two comments: 1) I'd suggest throwing a more posix error string like srcPath + ": No such file or directory" 2) Should test the exit code of shell.run() to ensure it's non-zero upon failure. If it happens to return 0, and it's a non-trivial fix, I'm universally addressing it via HADOOP-7176. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13702-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 18:59:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50423 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 18:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 18:59:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 33800 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33778 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33770 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:52:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:52:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9454AA25 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:52:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1251051248.6803.1300906326969.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010286#comment-13010286 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ I'm thinking beyond "just a compression library". > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13699-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:01:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62305 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:01:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:01:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 30682 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:01:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30656 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:01:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30636 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:01:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:01:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:01:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871584A8A8 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1460754890.6680.1300903266550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010259#comment-13010259 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ I don't really care what Cloudera does as a business. But Apache's track history on making everything a separate project to release faster has failed. We'd also be better off if folks would resist the temptation to back port anything and everything. We need to draw the line, and it might as well start here. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13701-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:09:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95822 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:09:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:09:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 50432 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:09:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50407 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50399 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:09:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E204ABB3 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1163516705.6726.1300903745741.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010266#comment-13010266 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7178: ------------------------------------- I'm not an expert on the filesystem code, but I have a few questions/concerns. Should the code really be casting to a ChecksumFileSystem w/o first checking instanceof? Should the default getVerifyChecksum() return instanceof ChecksumFileSystem instead of always true? That may help prevent changing other filesystem classes which may do not implement setVerifyChecksum. It looks like more fs classes may need to be changed than just Distributed. Other filesystem appear to have private booleans for verifyChecksum. The ChRoot will need to reach into its embedded fs. > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13698-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:19:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17793 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:19:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 88804 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88763 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88755 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:32:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:32:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:32:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6108849855 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:32:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1157601979.6610.1300901526394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010244#comment-13010244 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------- Hey Allen. When there are real customers (either external customers in my case or internal customers at a lot of the bigger companies using Hadoop) who need a feature, it's not always possible to say no. Given the choice between putting it in core (and most likely having major users and distros backport) vs putting it in an external library, I prefer the external library. I don't follow your reasoning that putting it in core will speed up an Apache release -- when has adding new code to a project ever made its release cycle faster? FWIW I have expressed this same opinion even on projects like HBase where releases are frequent and people run trees that are very close to the Apache bits. Keeping projects small makes releases easier, not harder, and frequent releases means fewer backports. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13700-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 19:50:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52388 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 19:50:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 19:50:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 36133 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36079 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 18:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36071 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 18:03:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:03:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:03:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D39E4A9C9 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:03:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1332029156.6713.1300903386444.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010260#comment-13010260 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- +1 on modular separation. Forcing folks to upgrade an entire cluster to allow them to use a compression library in their client MR programs seems like poor design. Compression is pluggable in Hadoop for a reason. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13697-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 20:03:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82143 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 20:03:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 20:03:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 73176 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73148 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 17:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73140 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 17:16:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:16:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:16:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01ABA4662A for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:16:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1445766659.6553.1300900566003.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010230#comment-13010230 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7206: ------------------------------------------ The disadvantage is that it is yet another reason not to get an Apache release out. After all, if all the 'good bits' have been back ported, why move forward? So no, please don't break it out, please don't back port. Or is the goal to see if we can make it to three years before we get a new, solid release out the door? > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13703-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 21:05:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18486 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 73269 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73239 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73230 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:05:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:05:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857994A8F2 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1780116841.7285.1300914306543.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: fs > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13704-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 21:16:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25444 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90053 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90022 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90014 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14A54ACAD for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:16:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <486040137.7300.1300914965788.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010450#comment-13010450 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7187: ------------------------------------------------ Good catch. - Could you add {{@Override}} to {{close()}}? - Please use junit 4 (i.e. {{org.junit.Test}} and other classes org.junit.* instead of {{junit.framework.TestCase}}) > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13705-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 21:28:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66000 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7143 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7106 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7098 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:28:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:28:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7555C4A0F7 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1489325550.7321.1300915686477.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7193: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13706-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 21:36:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13300 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20880 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20811 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20724 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:36:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:36:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78C74A37B for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1898222852.7344.1300916165945.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010463#comment-13010463 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6962: ------------------------------------- Problem appears to be deeper than the related bugs. The namenode appears to be the root cause of the incorrect permissions. The client code is trying to spackle over the issue by changing the final directory's permissions to what they should be. > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13707-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 21:46:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32770 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 32248 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32075 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32067 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:46:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:46:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0034A7D5 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:46:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <932561389.7376.1300916765832.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010470#comment-13010470 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7193: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12473984/HADOOP-7193.patch against trunk revision 1084415. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/317//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/317//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/317//console This message is automatically generated. > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13708-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 22:03:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98962 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 53727 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53691 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53683 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:03:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:03:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59774ACDC for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1189120574.7407.1300917785740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7193: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. This only fixes an help message. I have committed this. Thanks, Uma! > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13709-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 23 22:15:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20111 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 67278 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67247 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67239 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:15:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:15:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807F14A099 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:15:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2131705302.7444.1300918506523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010484#comment-13010484 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7193: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #533 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/533/]) HADOOP-7193. Correct the "fs -touchz" command help message. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13710-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 06:10:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40699 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 06:10:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 06:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 74987 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 06:10:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74367 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 06:10:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74254 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 06:10:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:10:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:10:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC684BDA2 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:10:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1492555004.7898.1300947006110.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010569#comment-13010569 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7178: --------------------------------------------- Hi Daryn Sharp, Thanks for your comments, {noformat} Should the code really be casting to a ChecksumFileSystem w/o first checking instanceof? {noformat} For CopyToLocalFile api, we will select LocalFilesystem as local file system. Here gteLocal() api used to get that local file system.This API will always return LocalFileSystem which extends CheckSumFileFystem So, instanceOf check not required. {noformat} Should the default getVerifyChecksum() return instanceof ChecksumFileSystem instead of always true? That may help prevent changing other filesystem classes which may do not implement setVerifyChecksum. {noformat} Here By deafult local file system will be LocalFileSystem. This will create crc files. So, I put default as true. If user wanted to disable it, he will provide the implementation for setVerifyChecksum() and getVerifyChecksum() like DistributedFileSystem. {noformat} It looks like more fs classes may need to be changed than just Distributed. Other filesystem appear to have private booleans for verifyChecksum. {noformat} Here we are not forcing implementation classes to implement this methods. If Concrete classes does not want to manage this checkSumVerification flag then default implemenation will work. > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13711-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 07:16:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43966 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 07:16:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 07:16:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 20707 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 07:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20638 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 07:16:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20630 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 07:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E347C4BD19 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:16:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2089562312.7962.1300950965927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G reassigned HADOOP-7208: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13712-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 09:58:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50377 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 69015 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68989 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68976 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:58:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:58:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF14BCFB for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1387967535.8110.1300960685991.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1055815913.6001.1300253369611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7193) Help message is wrong for touchz command. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010617#comment-13010617 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7193: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #35 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/35/]) HADOOP-7193. Correct the "fs -touchz" command help message. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Help message is wrong for touchz command. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7193 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7193 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7193.patch, HADOOP-7193.patch > > > Help message for touchz command is > -touchz : Write a timestamp in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format > in a file at . An error is returned if the file exists with non-zero length. > Actually current DFS behaviour is that it will not write any time stamp in created file. Just it is creating zero size file. > So better to change the help message to give exact meaning. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13713-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 14:35:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51283 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 70070 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70037 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70029 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95FB4BA3D for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272403489.8414.1300977305821.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7174: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7174.1.patch > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13714-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 14:35:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51525 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 70282 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70251 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70243 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5AF4BA43 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <635582632.8419.1300977305964.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7187: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7187.1.patch > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13715-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 14:41:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59859 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 79785 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79738 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79730 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34844BD44 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1841161202.8442.1300977665731.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K updated HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7194.patch > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13716-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 15:06:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62181 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 15:06:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 15:06:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 40148 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:06:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40033 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40025 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 15:06:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:06:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:06:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A19B4B6BC for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:06:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1110076390.8468.1300979166365.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010695#comment-13010695 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------- +1 > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13717-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 15:28:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12430 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 91671 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91629 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91420 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 15:28:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C856D4B233 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <900780605.8505.1300980485817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010707#comment-13010707 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-5983: ------------------------------------------- It probably might have been fixed in trunk. I still see this on our Y! internal 0.20.2xx branch. But this has been existed for a while and should be the same for a Apache Hadoop 0.20 release. $ xmllint /conf/hadoop/namenode/mapred-site.xml /conf/hadoop/namenode/mapred-site.xml:615: parser error : Opening and ending tag mismatch: foobar line 12 and configuration ^ /grid/0/gs/conf/hadoop/namenode/mapred-site.xml:616: parser error : Premature end of data in tag configuration line 6 .. 2011-03-24 15:16:26,413 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "foobar" must be terminated by the matching end-tag "". 2011-03-24 15:16:26,413 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "foobar" must be terminated by the matching end-tag "". at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1236) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:1092) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getProps(Configuration.java:1036) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.get(Configuration.java:414) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getLong(Configuration.java:519) at org.apache.hadoop.security.Groups.(Groups.java:55) at org.apache.hadoop.security.Groups.getUserToGroupsMappingService(Groups.java:137) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.initialize(UserGroupInformation.java:180) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.setConfiguration(UserGroupInformation.java:206) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.initialize(NameNode.java:241) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.(NameNode.java:434) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1153) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1162) Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "foobar" must be terminated by the matching end-tag "". at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:239) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:283) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:180) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:1141) ... 12 more 2011-03-24 15:16:26,414 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13718-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 15:37:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56834 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 9303 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9139 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9131 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:37:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A054B6C4 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:37:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1820538773.8532.1300981025855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010713#comment-13010713 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7178: ------------------------------------- The getlocal method is returning a LocalFileSystem, so if "fs" is declared as such, could the cast be removed? Regarding the getVerifyChecksum(), my concern is it's semantically wrong for all filesystems to claim (by default) that checksum files are supported. The default should be the truth. Granted, the implementation is backwards compatible, but future callers may operation on false assumptions of crc files. Would it be better to default as false in FileSystem, and ChecksumFileSystem overrides for true? I think this would also retain backwards compatibility? > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13719-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 15:59:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4815 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 54060 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53999 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53982 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:59:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5E34B2EF for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:59:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2100584279.8591.1300982345841.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010729#comment-13010729 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-5983: ------------------------------------- Are you requesting for the bug to be reopened so it can be fixed on an older release? An aside: while this is likely a bug since the namenode shouldn't need the mapred conf, it seems odd to push an unneeded file to the namenode, but then not push it's dependencies. It seems like it should be all-or-nothing operation. Ie. Push both or neither? > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13720-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 16:34:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44040 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 29133 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29092 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:34:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20D14B691 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <856448409.8711.1300984445922.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K updated HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13721-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 17:15:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56436 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 91191 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91159 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91151 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:15:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73184C788 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:15:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1774131023.8794.1300986905812.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010771#comment-13010771 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------------- I looked at the patch and think it looks good to me with only a few comments, 1) In PathData.java, class member exists which is a Boolean variable, its value is determined by checking if FileStatus is null. Since FileStatus is another class member, by checking whether FileStatus is null, we can already know if the Path exists. So I think we can eliminate this "exist" member variable? 2) In Command.java#displayError(Exception e) {code} if (errorMessage == null) { errorMessage = e.toString(); } {code} StringUtils.stringifyException() is a common utility function which makes a string representation of the exception. I think using this is better than just toString() Also, it would be a good idea to log a debug message using LOG.debug to print out the full exception stack trace, so that debugging is easier. 3) In Command.java#run() {code} * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the option parsing fails {code} would it be a good idea to link the function, so it is more clear? i.e. * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@link processOptions(args)} fails I am confused about the other throws comment {code} * @throws non-IOExceptions such rpc failures {code} 4) In Command.java#run(String, cmd, LinkedList args) the exit code of error was -1 in the original code, it is now changed to 1. Although it does not matter as long as it is non-zero value, why not keep it the same? 5) You are making the methods in PathData.java public, just making it package default by removing the "public" should be sufficient enough in our case? > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13722-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 17:17:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63247 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 95054 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95012 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95004 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:17:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:17:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB53B4C86A for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <212888898.8801.1300987025829.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010772#comment-13010772 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7174: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474506/HADOOP-7174.1.patch against trunk revision 1084769. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/318//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/318//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/318//console This message is automatically generated. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13723-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 17:27:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 412 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 13038 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12988 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12980 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:27:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:27:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D9E4CC80 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1095678097.8836.1300987625809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 Release Note: (was: Patch provided) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Uma! Also, thanks Daryn for reviewing it. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13724-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 17:37:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45056 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 22428 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22402 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22394 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:37:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B115A4C0F2 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:37:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1063546936.8872.1300988225722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1723498609.5040.1300840326140.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7207) fs member of FSShell is not really needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010787#comment-13010787 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-7207: -------------------------------------- Duplicate of HADOOP-5749 ? > fs member of FSShell is not really needed > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7207 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7207 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > > FileSystem object should be created on demand when needed in FSShell, instead of always creating one that connects to the default FileSystem. > It will also solve a problem of connecting to non-existant/non-functional default, when it is not really needed for this run. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13725-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 17:43:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46368 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28385 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28355 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28347 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:43:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD584C3B0 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:43:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <987716611.8890.1300988586041.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010792#comment-13010792 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7174: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #534 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/534/]) HADOOP-7174. Null is displayed in the "fs -copyToLocal" command. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13726-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 18:02:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16501 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 18:02:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 18:02:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 61355 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:02:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61315 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61307 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 18:02:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:02:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:02:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC434CA84 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:02:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <585136449.8940.1300989725827.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010804#comment-13010804 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7187: --------------------------------------------- Hi Nicholas, Thanks for your comments, I fixed them and submitted the patch. > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13727-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 18:17:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55445 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 74900 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74875 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74867 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FE24CF63 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1426146929.8972.1300990625729.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1723498609.5040.1300840326140.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7207) fs member of FSShell is not really needed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010813#comment-13010813 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7207: ------------------------------------ Be careful with this one as we move to Federation, because the "-fs" command line option is currently the only way to direct the FSClient at a file system other than the default one, if any. So if you might want your client to target one of several name services (federated namenodes), you have to use the -fs option or provide an alternative. > fs member of FSShell is not really needed > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7207 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7207 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > > FileSystem object should be created on demand when needed in FSShell, instead of always creating one that connects to the default FileSystem. > It will also solve a problem of connecting to non-existant/non-functional default, when it is not really needed for this run. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13728-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 18:33:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32754 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 97283 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97251 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97242 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:33:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:33:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD744C5FA for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <27426261.9046.1300991585897.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5983) Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010820#comment-13010820 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-5983: ------------------------------------------- This was opened for 0.20 when it was the current release. If its validated in 0.22, I am ok. The dependencies might be more specific to our setup, but since configuration gets serialized, a user can't have separate parameters for hdfs and mapred . For eg: fs.default.name when a cluster has multiple hdfs instances. > Namenode shouldn't read mapred-site.xml > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5983 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Rajiv Chittajallu > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > The name node seem to read mapred-site.xml and fails if it can't parse it. > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,663 FATAL org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration: error parsing conf file: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > 2009-06-05 22:37:15,664 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode: java.lang.RuntimeException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Error attempting to parse XML file (href='/hadoop/conf/local/local-mapred-site.xml'). > In our config, local-mapred-site.xml is included only in mapred-site.xml which we don't push to the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13729-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 19:02:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17087 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 44677 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44656 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44648 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:02:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:02:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F784C264 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:02:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1469732027.9196.1300993325946.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7187: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13730-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 19:18:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61689 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 69670 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69626 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69618 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D731D4C799 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1979847742.9227.1300994285877.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010852#comment-13010852 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7187: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474507/HADOOP-7187.1.patch against trunk revision 1085043. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/319//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/319//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/319//console This message is automatically generated. > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13731-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 20:45:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41191 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 90787 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90758 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90750 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:45:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F7B4C9B9 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:45:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <209658622.9507.1300999505815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7187: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Uma! > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13732-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 20:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78197 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 20:53:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 20:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7531 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 20:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7490 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 20:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7437 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 20:53:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:53:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC1C4CC9A for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:53:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1738871234.9534.1300999986183.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010915#comment-13010915 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7187: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #535 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/535/]) HADOOP-7187. Fix socket leak in GangliaContext. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13733-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 21:48:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64111 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 21:48:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 21:48:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 6856 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6811 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6803 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 21:48:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51854C3CA for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:48:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <484037901.9870.1301003285869.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7187: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.1) Reverted it from 0.21 since {{TestGangliaContext}} cannot be compiled. > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13734-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 21:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72431 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8910 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8880 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8872 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF204C4BE for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1524283924.9884.1301003406242.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010952#comment-13010952 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7187: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #36 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/36/]) HADOOP-7187. Fix socket leak in GangliaContext. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13735-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 24 21:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72449 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9134 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9094 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9086 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E3B4C4C4 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:50:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1785402758.9888.1301003406344.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010953#comment-13010953 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7174: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #36 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/36/]) HADOOP-7174. Null is displayed in the "fs -copyToLocal" command. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13736-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 00:26:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62944 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 89868 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89838 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89828 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:26:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:26:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13EF4C6FA for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:26:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1176206702.10337.1301012765722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7209) Extensions to FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas moved HDFS-1784 to HADOOP-7209: --------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.3) 0.20.3 Key: HADOOP-7209 (was: HDFS-1784) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > Extensions to FsShell > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7209 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7209 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Olga Natkovich > > Our project, Pig, exposes FsShell functionality to our end users through a shell command. We want to use this command with no modifications to make sure that whether you work with HDFS through Hadoop or Pig you get identical semantics. > The main concern that has been recently raised by our users is that there is no way to ignore certain failures that they consider to be benign, for instance, removing a non-existent directory. > We have 2 asks related to this issue: > (1) Meaningful error code returned from FsShell (we use java class) so that we can take different actions on different errors > (2) Unix like ways to tell the command to ignore certain behavior. Here are the commands that we would like to be expanded/implemented: > * rm -f > * rmdir ---ignore-fail-on-non-empty > * mkdir -p -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13737-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 00:32:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82602 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 94163 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94131 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94123 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:32:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:32:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E275D4C8D0 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:32:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1387364966.10342.1301013125924.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch - Move start/stop scripts from $PREFIX/bin to $PREFIX/sbin. - Added warning message that $HADOOP_HOME is deprecated per Owen's request. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13738-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 00:54:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56312 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 00:54:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20330 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20299 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20291 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B8D4CFE2 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1028059529.10444.1301014447032.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 0.21.1 > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13739-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 00:54:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56359 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 20562 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20528 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20520 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9284CFCD for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <498518309.10427.1301014446502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6941.patch Updated patch attached. Refactors the initialization code into two functions and uses an annotation on getOsPrincipalClass to remove the warnings. > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13740-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 00:54:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56404 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 00:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 20803 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20747 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20739 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_RHS_DOB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA0E4CFDE for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1231694715.10442.1301014446966.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.1) 0.23.0 > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13741-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 11:13:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29243 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 61174 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61089 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61081 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6F94D6ED for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <218361125.10941.1301051585973.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011157#comment-13011157 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7174: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #641 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/641/]) HADOOP-7174. Null is displayed in the "fs -copyToLocal" command. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13742-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 11:13:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29240 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 61244 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61100 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61091 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07D14D6EB for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <51984340.10939.1301051585916.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627534738.611.1300110389998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7187) Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011156#comment-13011156 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7187: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #641 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/641/]) HADOOP-7187. Fix socket leak in GangliaContext. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Socket Leak in org.apache.hadoop.metrics.ganglia.GangliaContext > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7187 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7187 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7187.1.patch, HADOOP-7187.patch > > > Init method is creating DatagramSocket. But this is not closed any where. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13743-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 14:03:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84690 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 14:03:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 14:03:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 32384 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 14:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32348 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 14:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32279 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 14:03:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:03:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:03:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787D14DDF4 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:03:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1995829420.11194.1301061786490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7209) Extensions to FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp reassigned HADOOP-7209: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Extensions to FsShell > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7209 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7209 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Olga Natkovich > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > Our project, Pig, exposes FsShell functionality to our end users through a shell command. We want to use this command with no modifications to make sure that whether you work with HDFS through Hadoop or Pig you get identical semantics. > The main concern that has been recently raised by our users is that there is no way to ignore certain failures that they consider to be benign, for instance, removing a non-existent directory. > We have 2 asks related to this issue: > (1) Meaningful error code returned from FsShell (we use java class) so that we can take different actions on different errors > (2) Unix like ways to tell the command to ignore certain behavior. Here are the commands that we would like to be expanded/implemented: > * rm -f > * rmdir ---ignore-fail-on-non-empty > * mkdir -p -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13744-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 15:03:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98841 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 15:03:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 15:03:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 66025 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 15:03:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65989 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 15:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65981 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 15:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:03:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9764D8B5 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:03:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <471610084.11410.1301065386044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7202-2.patch 1) I feel that "if (item.exists)" is more intuitive to a reader of external code than "if (item.stat != null)". I will change it if you feel strongly. 2) Great idea. 3) I went back and added javadocs links to all my new methods. Phew. 4) I'm trying to more closely follow unix conventions. Also, -1 for invalid usage versus 1 for execution failure, allows external scripts to differentiate the mode of failure. 5) There are other external commands that subclass Command and will need access to this class if updated, so I don't think I can reduce the visibility. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13745-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 17:54:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66095 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 17:54:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 17:54:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 64540 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64511 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64503 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:54:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99B34DE42 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:54:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1125772000.11749.1301075645822.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011310#comment-13011310 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Uma, some tests in HDFS failed after this; see {{HDFS-1786}}. Could you fix them as well? > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13746-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 18:06:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22114 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 78365 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78288 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78280 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:06:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:06:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA89E4D37E for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:06:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1340370439.11781.1301076365826.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011316#comment-13011316 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7174: --------------------------------------------- Thanks Nicholas, i addressed this. I prepared the patch , will upload it in HDFS. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13747-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 20:51:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61717 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 1165 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1129 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1121 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:51:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:51:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294704E051 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:51:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1981302789.12287.1301086266165.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011411#comment-13011411 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------------------------ Good catch! It seems that closing in the finally-block using {{closeStream(..)}} is sufficient. The following is not required. {code} if(close) { out.close(); + out = null; in.close(); + in = null; } {code} > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13748-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 21:28:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66979 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 58312 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58258 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58248 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:28:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBF34E978 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <155809398.12391.1301088486306.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011429#comment-13011429 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6941: ------------------------------------- Looks good to me. Steve, can you confirm this still works on your setup? > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13749-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 22:57:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53097 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 61754 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61707 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61699 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:57:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:57:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33F64E238 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:57:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1466631733.12779.1301093826731.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011471#comment-13011471 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6949: --------------------------------------------- I think we should also commit it to 0.22. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13750-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 22:59:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53264 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 62413 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62313 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62302 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:59:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:59:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB6F4E2D2 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:59:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <173142817.12786.1301093945892.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011473#comment-13011473 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------------- Patch looks good to me now. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13751-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 23:19:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21372 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 23:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 81222 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81192 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81184 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4344E8DC for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1164009065.12866.1301095146309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13752-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 23:19:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21581 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 81457 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81425 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81409 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BCF4E8DE for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1693709666.12868.1301095146364.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Summary: Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation (was: Hadoop 0.21 will not work on non-SUN JREs due to use of com.sun.security in org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java) > Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13753-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 23:27:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53060 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 23:27:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 23:27:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 87079 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:27:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87041 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:27:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87033 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 23:27:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:27:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:27:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFDC4EB01 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:27:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <367709849.12905.1301095626119.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011498#comment-13011498 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------------- +1. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13754-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Mar 25 23:45:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6219 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6093 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6063 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6055 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:45:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61704EE92 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:45:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1070507832.12946.1301096705742.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011505#comment-13011505 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7202: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474619/HADOOP-7202-2.patch against trunk revision 1085122. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1076 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1072 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/320//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/320//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/320//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13755-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Mar 26 00:45:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4234 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2011 00:45:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2011 00:45:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 52001 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2011 00:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51963 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2011 00:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51949 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2011 00:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:45:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB94EA0A for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:45:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1996587084.13055.1301100306098.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011519#comment-13011519 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------------ Since this is an incompatible protocol change, please do start whatever discussion is needed in the community. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13756-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 27 03:33:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2897 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2011 03:33:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2011 03:33:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 65123 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 03:33:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64961 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 03:33:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64948 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2011 03:33:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:33:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FBB56FE7 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:33:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1250518876.14486.1301196785819.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao reassigned HADOOP-7055: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13757-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 27 04:43:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91390 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2011 04:43:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2011 04:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 79358 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 04:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79325 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 04:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79312 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2011 04:43:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:43:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:43:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A2D57802 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:43:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1208479021.14549.1301200985748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011724#comment-13011724 ] Jingguo Yao commented on HADOOP-7055: ------------------------------------- When EventCounter appender is triggered, it only updates its counts field. So equals overhead is not negligible compared to the actual logging which is counts field updating in this case. But if we think that the overhead incurred by equals is negligible on the overall performance, we can use equals. > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13758-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Mar 27 17:52:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21246 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9747 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9708 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9698 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2011 17:52:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:52:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DCB5794C for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <46167893.15525.1301248325725.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011825#comment-13011825 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7055: --------------------------------- bq. When EventCounter appender is triggered, it only updates its counts field. So equals overhead is not negligible compared to the actual logging which is counts field updating in this case. When the appender is triggered, a new LoggingEvent object is created and at least one synchronization happened which is probably 100x more expensive then the method call. Note, updating the counts field is a *synchronized* call, which is about 30x more expensive then the equals call. If don't believe it, just benchmark it and make sure you have at least two threads doing the update, so jvm doesn't elide the locks. > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13759-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 02:18:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30899 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 92215 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92176 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92168 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:18:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF19C836E8 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:18:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benoit Sigoure (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <360735347.15889.1301278686779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011893#comment-13011893 ] Benoit Sigoure commented on HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------------- Allen, I agree that situation with back-porting everything in Hadoop has gotten to a ridiculous point. So while I understand and share your desire to stop back-porting things or splitting things out, you also have to understand the desire of users like us whose business greatly depends on Hadoop/HBase and where we need to move forward quickly. If we were to wait until Apache releases a version of Hadoop we can use in production with HBase (proper append, no data loss, etc), we'd still be waiting. So although I don't like the current situation with Hadoop either, I'm glad someone did the grungy work of back-porting things or splitting some things out so we could move forward. What Todd is proposing is simply a way to make Snappy available quickly to users like us, and we'd be very happy about that. I think it's in everyone's interest to make this available as soon as possible and not wait for a future Hadoop release. Note: we're not Cloudera customers, but we use CDH because It Just Works. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13760-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 05:40:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99877 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 82237 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82211 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 05:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82203 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 05:40:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:40:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:40:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94C8838D9 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:40:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <498392844.16024.1301290805820.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011916#comment-13011916 ] Devaraj K commented on HADOOP-7194: ----------------------------------- Thanks Nicholas for reviewing. Closing the streams in the finally-block using closeStream(..) will suppress the exception if out.close()/in.close() throws and will not be thrown back to the caller. {code:xml} if(close) { out.close(); + out = null; in.close(); + in = null; } {code} With the above lines if out.close() throws exception that will be thrown back to the caller and also other streams will be closed in finally-block using closeStream(..). As per the discussions in the issue MAPREDUCE-2243, this way is followed. > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13761-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 08:38:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82901 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 08:38:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 08:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 47624 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 08:38:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47584 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 08:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47569 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 08:38:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB4983B71 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1369222834.16242.1301301485839.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao updated HADOOP-7055: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Per Luke's suggestion, use equals instead of == for Level check. > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13762-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 08:40:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83211 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 48715 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48682 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48674 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:40:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:40:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B627083C12 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:40:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jingguo Yao (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1506744836.16246.1301301605742.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingguo Yao updated HADOOP-7055: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7055.patch > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Attachments: HADOOP-7055.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13763-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 14:48:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97420 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 82929 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82886 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82878 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:48:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:48:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1C583FA1 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:48:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <756924939.16800.1301323686504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7202-3.patch Fixed javadoc link warning from mis-capitalized method name. The javac warnings are due to FsCommand.java stubbing out unnecessary abstract methods which happen to be deprecated. The deprecations are generating the warnings. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13764-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 16:35:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47644 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 46942 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46808 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46799 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09A846BB for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Chown command is not working from FSShell. ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7210 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Environment: Linux Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13765-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 16:35:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47683 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 47110 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47029 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46999 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63E3846BF for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1377782417.16969.1301330105874.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012127#comment-13012127 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7210: --------------------------------------------- Based on the passed arguments, it is creating the Handlers. when argument is -chown, it is creating ChownHandler. {code} else if (cmd.equals("-chown")) { handler = new ChownHandler(argv[startIndex++]); {code} But here the problem is, it is not populating owner, group values in this constructor. just it is calling supper. It is not populating the group, owner. {code} protected ChownHandler(String cmd) { //for chgrp super(cmd); } {code} Since it is not populating, setOwner will not be invoked on fileSystem.So permissions will not change. {code} if (newOwner != null || newGroup != null) { try { srcFs.setOwner(file.getPath(), newOwner, newGroup); {code} > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13766-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 16:53:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4100 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 71101 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71056 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71048 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88FC84C36 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <458485421.16988.1301331186818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012131#comment-13012131 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------------------------ > Closing the streams in the finally-block using closeStream(..) will suppress the exception ... Good point. +1 then. > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13767-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 16:53:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4185 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 71645 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71613 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71605 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2F484C3B for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:53:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <300487413.16993.1301331186964.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Devaraj K Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13768-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:09:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59462 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 91797 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91772 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91764 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:09:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:09:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C140841AB for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:09:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <508986984.17048.1301332146046.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012140#comment-13012140 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7194: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474511/HADOOP-7194.patch against trunk revision 1085122. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/321//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/321//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/321//console This message is automatically generated. > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13769-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:15:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62835 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 97269 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97217 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97209 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:15:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F95C843FF for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1523893072.17069.1301332506519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012145#comment-13012145 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7202: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Daryn, - Could you add the annotations to the existing classes? {code} @InterfaceAudience.Private @InterfaceStability.Unstable/Evolving {code} - Since they are private unstable interfaces, you may simply remove the methods. Otherwise, please explain in the javadoc that why these methods are deprecated and what are the alternatives. > The javac warnings are due to FsCommand.java stubbing out unnecessary abstract methods which happen to be deprecated. ... - If {{FsCommand}} is not useful now, how about adding it later when it becomes useful? {code} +// this class may not look useful now, but it's a placeholder for future +// functionality to act as a registry for fs commands. currently it's being +// used to implement unnecessary abstract methods in the base class + +abstract public class FsCommand extends Command { {code} > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13770-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:17:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67341 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 98531 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98488 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98480 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:17:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC14384472 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1649410042.17077.1301332625701.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7210: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7210.patch > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13771-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:40:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54413 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21337 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21294 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21286 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:40:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:40:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC71984C43 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:40:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1016709088.17112.1301334005899.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13772-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:42:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54851 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 21869 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21832 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21824 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF84784D16 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <632394294.17125.1301334125977.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7210: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13773-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:42:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54891 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 22084 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22047 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22039 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D158E84D12 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1795064646.17121.1301334125854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7194: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.1 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Devaraj! > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13774-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 17:54:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 831 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 32407 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32361 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32353 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC08484047 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:54:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1822783219.17146.1301334845832.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012156#comment-13012156 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7194: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #536 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/536/]) HADOOP-7194. Fix resource leak in IOUtils.copyBytes(..). Contributed by Devaraj K > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13775-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 18:45:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67636 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 3588 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3520 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3512 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:45:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F398484F08 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:45:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1118189672.17250.1301337905994.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1224526256.2676.1300746425823.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7204) remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012171#comment-13012171 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7204: ------------------------------------------------ Seems that this caused the recent failure of {{TestHDFSCLI}} (e.g. [build #293|https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/293//testReport/org.apache.hadoop.cli/TestHDFSCLI/testAll/]). Could you take a look? > remove local unused fs variable from CmdHandler and FsShellPermissions.changePermissions > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7204 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7204 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7204.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13776-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 19:13:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68781 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 19:13:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 19:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 45724 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 19:13:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45693 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 19:13:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45685 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 19:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF980847D2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <885549230.17275.1301339585847.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012180#comment-13012180 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7210: ------------------------------------- The root problem is that a prior bug that remove the FileSystem var from the ctors. This left two ctors with a String signature. Changing one of the three commands to have a ctor of (String, String) just for the purpose of working around the ambiguity doesn't seem right. My suggestion would be to split the user/group mode parsing into a separate parseOwnerGroup (or similar) method. Chown's ctor calls this new method with its own impl, Chgrp overrides the method with it's own impl. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13777-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 19:45:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68860 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 80265 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80165 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80154 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:45:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:45:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13DB84320 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:45:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1900855498.17331.1301341505984.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7202-4.patch Added annotations for audience and stability. I am unable to remove the abstract methods that I marked as deprecated (and then stubbed in FsCommand) because other tools are depending on this class. I'm relatively certain the new apis are firm, but I'd now like to hold off on adding the deprecations until FsShell is completed. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13778-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 21:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5511 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 45269 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45237 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45229 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F6B84AB2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:50:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <444835630.17630.1301349005745.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012245#comment-13012245 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7194: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #37 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/37/]) HADOOP-7194. Fix resource leak in IOUtils.copyBytes(..). Contributed by Devaraj K > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13779-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 21:54:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6033 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 49101 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49066 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49058 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:54:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C237484BCB for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:54:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2126131872.17638.1301349245792.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7211) Security uses proprietary Sun APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Security uses proprietary Sun APIs ---------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7211 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7211 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Eli Collins The security code uses the KrbException, Credentials, and PrincipalName classes from sun.security.krb5 and Krb5Util from sun.security.jgss.krb5. These may disappear in future Java releases. Also Hadoop does not compile using jdks that do not support them, for example with the following IBM JDK. {noformat} $ /home/eli/toolchain/java-x86_64-60/bin/java -version java version "1.6.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxa6460sr9fp1-20110208_03(SR9 FP1)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux amd64-64 jvmxa6460sr9-20110203_74623 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) J9VM - 20110203_074623 JIT - r9_20101028_17488ifx3 GC - 20101027_AA) JCL - 20110203_01 {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13780-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 23:01:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54547 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 17858 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17826 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17818 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:01:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:01:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F7984F98 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:01:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <297669161.17734.1301353265784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012264#comment-13012264 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7202: ------------------------------------------------ +1 Thanks for making the changes. Having {{FsCommand}} makes sense. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13781-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 23:17:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7605 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 30305 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30258 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30118 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:17:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:17:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADE2843E7 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <213172196.17762.1301354225827.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012269#comment-13012269 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7202: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474804/HADOOP-7202-4.patch against trunk revision 1086309. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/322//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/322//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/322//console This message is automatically generated. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13782-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Mar 28 23:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36048 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 56428 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56389 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56381 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:50:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433B084CF2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1938837271.17808.1301356206272.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7202: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also, thanks Tanping for the review. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13783-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 00:04:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75639 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 67154 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67120 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67112 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:04:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:04:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D44F84080 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:04:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <125802827.17827.1301357046051.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012281#comment-13012281 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #537 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/537/]) HADOOP-7202. Improve shell Command base class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13784-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 00:36:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88782 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 3228 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3173 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3165 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:36:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:36:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F115584929 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:36:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1488394173.17885.1301358965984.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE reopened HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------------------- HDFS cannot be compiled after this. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13785-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 00:42:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89785 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 00:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 00:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 10467 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10438 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10430 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 00:42:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:42:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:42:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD6784B18 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:42:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2028245730.17899.1301359325905.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2126131872.17638.1301349245792.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7211) Security uses proprietary Sun APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7211: -------------------------------- Component/s: security > Security uses proprietary Sun APIs > ---------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7211 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7211 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Eli Collins > > The security code uses the KrbException, Credentials, and PrincipalName classes from sun.security.krb5 and Krb5Util from sun.security.jgss.krb5. These may disappear in future Java releases. Also Hadoop does not compile using jdks that do not support them, for example with the following IBM JDK. > {noformat} > $ /home/eli/toolchain/java-x86_64-60/bin/java -version > java version "1.6.0" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxa6460sr9fp1-20110208_03(SR9 FP1)) > IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux amd64-64 jvmxa6460sr9-20110203_74623 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) > J9VM - 20110203_074623 > JIT - r9_20101028_17488ifx3 > GC - 20101027_AA) > JCL - 20110203_01 > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13786-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 00:44:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90052 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12476 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12452 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12439 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:44:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:44:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABC984BC5 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:44:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1053147547.17906.1301359445827.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012297#comment-13012297 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7202: ------------------------------------------------ I have temporarily reverted this. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13787-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 00:54:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35058 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 24573 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24542 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24534 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:54:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015C584E4E for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1814788763.17918.1301360046002.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012299#comment-13012299 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #538 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/538/]) Revert HADOOP-7202 since HDFS cannot be compiled. > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13789-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 04:18:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71420 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74181 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73916 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73900 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EB7857FB for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2028196840.18129.1301372285926.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49961760.7518.1296748349151.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7130) Map Reduce Tasks are continously failing, when one among the several harddisks available on the TaskTracker fails. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K reassigned HADOOP-7130: --------------------------------- Assignee: Devaraj K > Map Reduce Tasks are continously failing, when one among the several harddisks available on the TaskTracker fails. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7130 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7130 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.3, 0.20-append > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.20.4 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7130.patch > > > 1. Pull out one hard disk from Task tracker node (out of 10 disks pull one). Now it is noted that some jobs are failing. > However process is continued. > 2. Wait for sometime (15 mins) and pull out one disk from another Task tracker. > 3. More number of jobs failed now and it can be seen from UI. Process is getting paused. > The exception can be seen in the job tracker UI for a failed job. > {code:xml} > Error initializing attempt_201010221528_10174_m_000011_0: > java.io.IOException: Expecting a line not the end of stream > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.parseExecResult(DF.java:110) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:182) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.run(Shell.java:137) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.getAvailable(DF.java:74) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator$AllocatorPerContext.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:385) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:113) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.java:835) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.java:1790) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.java:104) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracker.java:1753) > Error initializing attempt_201010221528_10174_m_000011_1: > org.apache.hadoop.util.DiskChecker$DiskErrorException: Could not find any valid local directory for taskTracker/jobcache/job_201010221528_10174/work > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator$AllocatorPerContext.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:454) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator.getLocalPathForWrite(LocalDirAllocator.java:113) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.localizeJob(TaskTracker.java:835) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.startNewTask(TaskTracker.java:1790) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.access$1200(TaskTracker.java:104) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker$TaskLauncher.run(TaskTracker.java:1753) > {code} > Task Tracker log can be seen here : > {code:xml} > 2010-10-25 16:36:24,215 ERROR mapred.TaskTracker (TaskTracker.java:offerService(1211)) - Caught exception: java.io.IOException: Expecting a line not the end of stream > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.parseExecResult(DF.java:110) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:182) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.run(Shell.java:137) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.getAvailable(DF.java:74) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.getFreeSpace(TaskTracker.java:1586) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.transmitHeartBeat(TaskTracker.java:1274) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:1106) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.run(TaskTracker.java:1848) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.main(TaskTracker.java:3022) > 2010-10-25 16:36:24,216 INFO mapred.TaskTracker (TaskTracker.java:run(1856)) - Lost connection to JobTracker [/192.168.97.1:9001]. Retrying... > java.lang.Exception: java.io.IOException: Expecting a line not the end of stream > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:1212) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.run(TaskTracker.java:1848) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.main(TaskTracker.java:3022) > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Expecting a line not the end of stream > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.parseExecResult(DF.java:110) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:182) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.run(Shell.java:137) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.DF.getAvailable(DF.java:74) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.getFreeSpace(TaskTracker.java:1586) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.transmitHeartBeat(TaskTracker.java:1274) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:1106) > ... 2 more > 2010-10-25 16:36:29,550 INFO mapred.TaskTracker (TaskTracker.java:transmitHeartBeat(1256)) - Resending 'status' to '192.168.97.1' with reponseId '18361 > 2010-10-25 16:36:29,550 WARN mapred.TaskTracker (TaskTracker.java:checkLocalDirs(2982)) - Task Tracker local can not create directory: /hdfsdata/0/mapred/local > 2010-10-25 16:36:32,656 WARN mapred.TaskTracker (TaskTracker.java:checkLocalDirs(2982)) - Task Tracker local can not create directory: /hdfsdata/0/mapred/local > {code} > This seems to be fixed in the trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13788-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 04:18:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71388 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74057 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73913 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73870 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 04:18:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B8C857FD for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 04:18:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <542366838.18131.1301372285991.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1687965.159931294234907446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7086) Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K reassigned HADOOP-7086: --------------------------------- Assignee: Devaraj K > Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7086 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: NA > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Priority: Minor > Attachments: common-3899.patch > > Original Estimate: 72h > Remaining Estimate: 72h > > Retrying socket connection failure times are hard coded as 45 and it is giving the retryring message for 45 times as below. > 2011-01-04 15:14:30,700 INFO ipc.Client (Client.java:handleConnectionFailure(487)) - Retrying connect to server: /10.18.52.124:50020. Already tried 1 time(s). > This can be made as configurable and also we can keep the default value as 45. If the user wants to decrease/increase, they can add this configurable property otherwise it can continue with the default value. > common\src\java\org\apache\hadoop\ipc\Client.java: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > private synchronized void setupConnection() throws IOException { > short ioFailures = 0; > short timeoutFailures = 0; > while (true) { > try { > this.socket = socketFactory.createSocket(); > this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(tcpNoDelay); > // connection time out is 20s > NetUtils.connect(this.socket, remoteId.getAddress(), 20000); > if (rpcTimeout > 0) { > pingInterval = rpcTimeout; // rpcTimeout overwrites pingInterval > } > this.socket.setSoTimeout(pingInterval); > return; > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* > * The max number of retries is 45, which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 > * minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13790-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 09:58:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88954 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 09:58:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 09:58:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 19893 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 09:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19861 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 09:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19853 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 09:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:58:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1F1858B0 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:58:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1194888740.18577.1301392685894.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012415#comment-13012415 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7210: --------------------------------------------- Hi Daryn, Thanks for your comments. I agree with you. But I have one suggestion. We can directly override the run method in Chown and Chgrp directly from CmdHandler. Currently the ChgrpHandler extends the ChownHandler thereby use the same run method. This might have been done to save some lines of code. But because of this, we are providing additional constructor and additional if checks in the code. For example, owner details check is not applicable for chgrp command. The owner will be always null, still we will execute the owner checks for ChgrepHandler also. {code} String newOwner = (owner == null || owner.equals(file.getOwner())) ? null : owner; .... .... if (newOwner != null || newGroup != null) { {code} Instead of this, Both Chown and Chgrp handlers can directly extend from CmdHandler provide the run method. Please tell me your suggestion on this. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13791-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 11:14:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36372 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 4554 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4518 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4503 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E1F852E9 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <141695368.18655.1301397246532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <113773164.6166.1300269149586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7194) Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012428#comment-13012428 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7194: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #645 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/645/]) HADOOP-7194. Fix resource leak in IOUtils.copyBytes(..). Contributed by Devaraj K > Potential Resource leak in IOUtils.java > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7194.patch > > > {code:title=IOUtils.java|borderStyle=solid} > try { > copyBytes(in, out, buffSize); > } finally { > if(close) { > out.close(); > in.close(); > } > } > {code} > In the above code if any exception throws from the out.close() statement, in.close() statement will not execute and the input stream will not be closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13792-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 11:14:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36394 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 4680 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4521 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4504 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CED852EB for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:14:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2062169100.18656.1301397246561.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1587140683.1515.1300732271817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7202) Improve Command base class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012429#comment-13012429 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7202: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #645 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/645/]) Revert HADOOP-7202 since HDFS cannot be compiled. HADOOP-7202. Improve shell Command base class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Improve Command base class > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7202 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7202-2.patch, HADOOP-7202-3.patch, HADOOP-7202-4.patch, HADOOP-7202.patch > > > Need to extend the Command base class to allow all command to easily subclass from a code set of code that correctly handles globs and exit codes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13793-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 12:53:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80186 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 61075 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61042 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61034 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:53:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF52485C1A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:53:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <39749085.18804.1301403185911.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012463#comment-13012463 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7210: ------------------------------------- Good idea, I think that would work too. In that case, would chgrp even need to inherit from chown? > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13794-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 13:13:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36768 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 91288 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91256 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91248 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE4786388 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <968846640.18826.1301404385913.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012469#comment-13012469 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7210: --------------------------------------------- In this case ChgrpHandler need not extend the ChownHandler > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13795-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 15:51:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76216 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 18386 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18348 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18340 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:51:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:51:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1762586129 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1203206855.19131.1301413866092.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7210: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7210.1.patch > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13796-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 15:57:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78800 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 15:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 15:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28422 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 15:57:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28385 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 15:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28351 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 15:57:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:57:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:57:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241D88639A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <590607924.19157.1301414226142.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012532#comment-13012532 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7210: ------------------------------------- +1 Nice work > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13797-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 17:53:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70806 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 52033 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51986 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51978 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:53:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADCB86423 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:53:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755471046.19378.1301421186369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012580#comment-13012580 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-6949: ------------------------------------ Hi Konstantin, the vote seems to be pretty strongly in favor, so I went ahead and ran some tests of the patch against v0.22. Confirmed that the patch applies automatically, and hadoop/common compiles and successfully runs core unit tests. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13798-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 17:59:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73112 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 64434 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64410 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64402 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:59:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:59:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8748667F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1433074824.19408.1301421546826.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012584#comment-13012584 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7210: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474892/HADOOP-7210.1.patch against trunk revision 1086455. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/323//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/323//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/323//console This message is automatically generated. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13799-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 18:08:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26954 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 81046 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81018 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81010 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:08:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:08:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85C8695D for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:08:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <592823699.19423.1301422085826.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012589#comment-13012589 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7210: ------------------------------------- Couple small comments: - Rather than injecting the "Extn" class into the FS Cache, could you instead set up a new scheme by setting "fs.testfs.impl" to your test class and then calling a command on testfs:///foo? Seems like a cleaner test pattern. - In ChgrpHandler you don't need to check for group == null anymore, right? > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13800-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Mar 29 18:20:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46406 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 14287 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14257 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14249 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:20:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797A86D35 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:20:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1261984333.19446.1301422806093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7174: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.1) This wasn't committed to branch-21 -- removing 0.21 fixversion. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13801-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 00:04:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25190 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 00:04:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 00:04:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 85308 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84994 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84976 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 00:04:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:04:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:04:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD2886748 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:04:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1235336773.20249.1301443445782.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7212) Reuse connection MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Reuse connection ---------------- Key: HADOOP-7212 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7212 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang One of my recent RPC change introduced a regression. It makes the first RPC to server, getProtocolSignature, and following RPCs not sharing the same connection. If all clients are short lived, this regression would double the number of connections in the cluster. The cause of the regression is that getProtocolSingature uses VersionProtocol to create a Connection object, and the following RPCs uses its own protocol name like ClientProtocol. Since protocol name is part of Connection object hashcode, this forces the RPC client to create a new Connection object, therefore forcing to create a new TCP/IP connection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13802-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 06:51:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77136 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 06:51:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 06:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 26769 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 06:51:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26668 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 06:51:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26646 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 06:51:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:51:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:51:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90408953C for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:51:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2002000154.20818.1301467865819.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1235336773.20249.1301443445782.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7212) Reuse connection MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang resolved HADOOP-7212. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Invalid Just found out that the regression was introduced to only our internal branch not to the Apache trunk. Good! > Reuse connection > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7212 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7212 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > > One of my recent RPC change introduced a regression. It makes the first RPC to server, getProtocolSignature, and following RPCs not sharing the same connection. If all clients are short lived, this regression would double the number of connections in the cluster. > The cause of the regression is that getProtocolSingature uses VersionProtocol to create a Connection object, and the following RPCs uses its own protocol name like ClientProtocol. Since protocol name is part of Connection object hashcode, this forces the RPC client to create a new Connection object, therefore forcing to create a new TCP/IP connection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13803-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 07:54:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74642 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 07:54:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 07:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 371 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 07:54:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 310 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 07:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 294 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 07:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:54:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB23F89A8B for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:54:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dieter Plaetinck (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1622531359.20885.1301471645894.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7213) document multiple keys per reducer oddity in hadoop streaming FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org document multiple keys per reducer oddity in hadoop streaming FAQ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7213 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7213 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: Dieter Plaetinck Priority: Minor Hi, for a newcomer to hadoop streaming, it comes as a surprise that the reducer receives arbitrary keys, unlike the "real" hadoop where a reducer works on a single key. An explanation for this is @ http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-user/201103.mbox/browser I suggest to add this to the FAQ of hadoop streaming -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13804-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 12:20:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25001 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 58972 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58942 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58933 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:20:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:20:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D648A9C7 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:20:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2119951237.21165.1301487606593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7210: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7210.2.patch > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13805-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 12:24:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38340 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 65831 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65788 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65780 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94128AB37 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <41193060.21171.1301487845951.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012927#comment-13012927 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7210: --------------------------------------------- Thanks Todd for the comments, I have fixed the comments, please check. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13806-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Mar 30 16:20:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34000 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20496 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20466 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20458 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:20:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD0E8BDB2 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:20:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent --------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7214 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Aaron T. Myers Assignee: Aaron T. Myers Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13808-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 00:02:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13230 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 00:02:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 00:02:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 77563 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77533 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77525 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:15:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:15:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B389F8A61F for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:15:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <802617055.22414.1301523305731.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013704#comment-13013704 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #539 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/539/]) Remove redundant entry for HADOOP-7167 in CHANGES.txt > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13809-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 00:09:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19320 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 00:03:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 00:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 29225 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 23:03:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29187 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 23:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29179 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 23:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:03:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEEC8B393 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <843174829.22535.1301526185717.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013721#comment-13013721 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7210: ------------------------------------- +1, looks good to me and verified that it fixes the tests. waiting on the hudson results before commit. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13810-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:11:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95766 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:11:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:11:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:11:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22926 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:11:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22918 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:11:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:11:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:11:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC798B56A for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7215 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: security Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13811-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:13:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96616 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:13:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 24972 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:13:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24946 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:13:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24938 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B628B5C5 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <314338492.22805.1301530385728.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013756#comment-13013756 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- Given that the server validate's the host name of the client's connection with the host name in the client's prinicipal name of format /_HOST@realm, I propose binding the client's socket to the address specified in the principal name. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13812-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:15:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 173 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:15:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 25667 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25631 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25623 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:15:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:15:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:15:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44348B643 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:15:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <66842632.22811.1301530505866.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.203.patch Path for 203 release. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.203.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13813-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:17:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6454 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:17:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 26786 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:17:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26759 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:17:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26749 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:17:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:17:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:17:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36438B6A6 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <553175688.22813.1301530625731.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.204.0) > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.203.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13807-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:17:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6573 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 1412 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1387 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 21:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1379 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 21:17:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:17:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E55C8ADAA for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:17:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1641971222.22193.1301519827383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1627211432.4057.1299578279558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7174) null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7174: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.21.1 > This wasn't committed to branch-21 - removing 0.21 fixversion. I have double checked. This was indeed committed to 0.21. See also [this comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1786?focusedCommentId=13012726&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13012726]. > null is displayed in the console,if the src path is invalid while doing copyToLocal operation from commandLine > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7174 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7174 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7174.1.patch, HADOOP-7174.patch > > > When we perform copyToLocal operations from commandLine and if src Path is invalid > srcFS.globStatus(srcpath) will return null. So, when we find the length of resulted value, it will *throw NullPointerException*. > Since we are handling generic exception , it will display null as the message. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13816-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:17:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6655 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 71770 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71742 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71734 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:17:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59DA8B3FD for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:17:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1069023074.22908.1301534225806.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7215.203.patch) > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13817-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:21:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25497 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74991 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74963 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74952 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4510A8B851 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <472704440.22917.1301534466280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013777#comment-13013777 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- I mean HDFS-7104 in my previous comment. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13818-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:21:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25721 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 75444 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75394 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75386 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2983F8B83B for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1553570407.22914.1301534466166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013776#comment-13013776 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- HDFS-1704 for some of the protocols such where clientPrincipal is needed, uses the second part as host name for validation. For such protocols, you cannot use a principal name that you mentioned. This does not affect protocols such as ClientProtocol though. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13815-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:24:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38687 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:24:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:24:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 55517 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:57:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55425 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55417 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:57:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:57:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:57:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4C18BE75 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:57:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1439316653.22856.1301533025763.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch Patch for the trunk, with minor modifications and tests. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.203.patch, HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13819-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:25:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45235 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 79809 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79783 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79771 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:25:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:25:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85B8BD3F for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1270320238.22954.1301534705830.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013778#comment-13013778 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- I see what you mean now. We could check if the second part is _HOST in the key and try binding to local address. Let me see if that could be done. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13814-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 01:27:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49897 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 01:27:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 01:27:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 30227 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:27:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30198 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 00:27:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30172 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 00:27:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:27:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:27:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02058B8F6 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:27:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1580705103.22823.1301531225718.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013761#comment-13013761 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------- I don't think this is quite right. It works when the IPC client is a server with a principal like hdfs/dn1.foo.com@REALM. But two-part principals are also used for other cases, eg tlipcon/admin@REALM. In this patch, won't that try to bind the local socket of my IPC client to the non-host "admin"? > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.203.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13820-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 02:03:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80797 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11777 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11740 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11731 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:03:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63D98B7C5 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <778592929.23013.1301536985743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013789#comment-13013789 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7210: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12474960/HADOOP-7210.2.patch against trunk revision 1087097. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/324//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/324//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/324//console This message is automatically generated. > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13821-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 02:28:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59314 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 26233 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26199 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26190 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFDE8BD27 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:28:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1720159589.23095.1301538485771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7210: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk, thanks Uma > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13822-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 02:44:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6950 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 02:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 34782 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34758 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34739 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4686C8B0FB for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <767557924.23133.1301539446285.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1687965.159931294234907446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7086) Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013799#comment-13013799 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7086: ------------------------------------- Hi Devaraj. I think this is a good idea to make configurable. - Can you please try to use Mockito rather than make a new TestSocketFactory in the test case? You can do something like: {code} SocketFactory mockFactory = Mockito.mock(new SocketFactory()); doThrow(new SocketTimeoutException()).when(mockFactory).createSocket(); Client client = new Client(..., mockFactory); .... Mockito.verify(mockFactory, Mockito.times(noOfSocketRetries)).createSocket(); {code} This is a bit more concise I think. - Also, the patch attached here makes a number of spurious whitespace changes which should be ommitted. - I don't think the name "ipc.client.connect.max.socket.retries" is very good - it's not clear how it's different from "ipc.client.connect.max.retries" which already exists. Maybe a better name would be "ipc.client.connect.max.retries.on.timeouts"? - There's a typo in the description of the parameter: "make to establish a server connection". Perhaps "Indicates the number of times a client will retry when encountering a socket timeout while connecting to an IPC server." > Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7086 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: NA > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Priority: Minor > Attachments: common-3899.patch > > Original Estimate: 72h > Remaining Estimate: 72h > > Retrying socket connection failure times are hard coded as 45 and it is giving the retryring message for 45 times as below. > 2011-01-04 15:14:30,700 INFO ipc.Client (Client.java:handleConnectionFailure(487)) - Retrying connect to server: /10.18.52.124:50020. Already tried 1 time(s). > This can be made as configurable and also we can keep the default value as 45. If the user wants to decrease/increase, they can add this configurable property otherwise it can continue with the default value. > common\src\java\org\apache\hadoop\ipc\Client.java: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > private synchronized void setupConnection() throws IOException { > short ioFailures = 0; > short timeoutFailures = 0; > while (true) { > try { > this.socket = socketFactory.createSocket(); > this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(tcpNoDelay); > // connection time out is 20s > NetUtils.connect(this.socket, remoteId.getAddress(), 20000); > if (rpcTimeout > 0) { > pingInterval = rpcTimeout; // rpcTimeout overwrites pingInterval > } > this.socket.setSoTimeout(pingInterval); > return; > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* > * The max number of retries is 45, which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 > * minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13823-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 02:44:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6995 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 35012 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34976 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34968 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FCA8B0F1 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:44:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <617171841.23123.1301539445996.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013797#comment-13013797 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7210: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #540 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/540/]) HADOOP-7210. Chown command is not working from FSShell. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13824-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 06:40:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4727 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 06:40:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 06:40:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 91326 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 06:40:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91300 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 06:40:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91289 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 06:40:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:40:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47FB43C6F for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:40:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <635269266.23604.1301553605735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013859#comment-13013859 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- Here is a way to do that at the RPC client: # get part2 from principal name of format /@realm and ensure part2 is a host name. # the address corresponding to this host name belongs to one of the local network interfaces on that host. If the above two conditions are satisfied, the bind to the socket to that address, before making rpc calls. It should address the following cases: # Principal name is not of format /@realm # part2 is not a valid host name # part2 is a valid host name, but not that of the client host Does this sound reasonable? > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13825-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 07:50:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42327 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 07:50:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 52684 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52603 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52589 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 07:50:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8DC8B2E6 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:50:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1490758718.23722.1301557805911.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013872#comment-13013872 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------- Hi Suresh. This seems like a reasonable solution. Maybe we can also check the kerberos info on the protocol interface, and if there's no clientPrincipal set, we can skip all of this? My thinking is that we want to avoid the reverse DNS lookups for the common case of user->cluster communications where no clientPrincipal annotation is present. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13826-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 11:13:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8859 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 2166 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2102 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2094 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA5C8BB85 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2057181928.24110.1301569985978.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <599378200.2869.1299537719453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7167) Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013924#comment-13013924 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7167: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #647 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/647/]) Remove redundant entry for HADOOP-7167 in CHANGES.txt > Allow using a file to exclude certain tests from build > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7167 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7167-cygwin.txt, hadoop-7167.txt > > > It would be nice to be able to exclude certain tests when running builds. For example, when a test is "known flaky", you may want to exclude it from the main Hudson job, but not actually disable it in the codebase (so that it still runs as part of another Hudson job, for example). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13827-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 11:13:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8894 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2362 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2327 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2318 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095AB8BB87 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:13:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1325457552.24112.1301569986035.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <8299358.16965.1301330105771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7210) Chown command is not working from FSShell. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013925#comment-13013925 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7210: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #647 (See [https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/647/]) HADOOP-7210. Chown command is not working from FSShell. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G > Chown command is not working from FSShell. > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7210 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7210.1.patch, HADOOP-7210.2.patch, HADOOP-7210.patch > > > chown command is not invoking the setOwner on FileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13828-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 15:02:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3381 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 88470 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88441 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87978 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 15:02:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8128C982 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:02:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1208431188.24452.1301583726048.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1687965.159931294234907446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7086) Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj K updated HADOOP-7086: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7086.patch > Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7086 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: NA > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7086.patch, common-3899.patch > > Original Estimate: 72h > Remaining Estimate: 72h > > Retrying socket connection failure times are hard coded as 45 and it is giving the retryring message for 45 times as below. > 2011-01-04 15:14:30,700 INFO ipc.Client (Client.java:handleConnectionFailure(487)) - Retrying connect to server: /10.18.52.124:50020. Already tried 1 time(s). > This can be made as configurable and also we can keep the default value as 45. If the user wants to decrease/increase, they can add this configurable property otherwise it can continue with the default value. > common\src\java\org\apache\hadoop\ipc\Client.java: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > private synchronized void setupConnection() throws IOException { > short ioFailures = 0; > short timeoutFailures = 0; > while (true) { > try { > this.socket = socketFactory.createSocket(); > this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(tcpNoDelay); > // connection time out is 20s > NetUtils.connect(this.socket, remoteId.getAddress(), 20000); > if (rpcTimeout > 0) { > pingInterval = rpcTimeout; // rpcTimeout overwrites pingInterval > } > this.socket.setSoTimeout(pingInterval); > return; > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* > * The max number of retries is 45, which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 > * minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13829-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 15:22:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80699 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 15:22:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 15:22:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 49260 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 15:22:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49101 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 15:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49031 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 15:22:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:22:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:22:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E38B380 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj K (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1732780269.24567.1301584925870.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1687965.159931294234907446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7086) Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014013#comment-13014013 ] Devaraj K commented on HADOOP-7086: ----------------------------------- Thanks Todd for reviewing. I updated the patch by addressing the above comments. > Retrying socket connection failure times can be made as configurable > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7086 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7086 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: NA > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Devaraj K > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7086.patch, common-3899.patch > > Original Estimate: 72h > Remaining Estimate: 72h > > Retrying socket connection failure times are hard coded as 45 and it is giving the retryring message for 45 times as below. > 2011-01-04 15:14:30,700 INFO ipc.Client (Client.java:handleConnectionFailure(487)) - Retrying connect to server: /10.18.52.124:50020. Already tried 1 time(s). > This can be made as configurable and also we can keep the default value as 45. If the user wants to decrease/increase, they can add this configurable property otherwise it can continue with the default value. > common\src\java\org\apache\hadoop\ipc\Client.java: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > private synchronized void setupConnection() throws IOException { > short ioFailures = 0; > short timeoutFailures = 0; > while (true) { > try { > this.socket = socketFactory.createSocket(); > this.socket.setTcpNoDelay(tcpNoDelay); > // connection time out is 20s > NetUtils.connect(this.socket, remoteId.getAddress(), 20000); > if (rpcTimeout > 0) { > pingInterval = rpcTimeout; // rpcTimeout overwrites pingInterval > } > this.socket.setSoTimeout(pingInterval); > return; > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* > * The max number of retries is 45, which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 > * minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13830-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 18:26:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4471 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 66473 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66385 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66377 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:26:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:26:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818C8C1CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:26:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <816377974.25244.1301595966553.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6941: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13831-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 18:47:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80463 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 18:47:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 18:47:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 14618 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 18:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14587 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 18:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14579 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 18:47:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:47:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:47:45 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6DE8CC39 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:47:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <925849752.25342.1301597227956.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014137#comment-13014137 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------------- In that case, we have two choices: # Fail at the client side: #* If the client principal name does not have /@realm format, fail it at the client with appropriate error. #* If the format is right, treat part2 as host name. Just try to bind to it and if bind fails, then the failure occurs at the client it self with appropriate error. # Fail at the server side: #* If the client principal name does not have /@realm format, bind to any local address for the request. #* If the format is right, treat part2 as host name. If host name is a valid local address, bind to it else bind to any local address. This request will be rejected by the server. I am leaning towards (2) because, server is rightly involved in the decision of rejecting the client. It provides a record of this at both the client and the server. This will help debugging on the server side, independent of client. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13832-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 19:26:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1540 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 51289 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51259 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51251 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:26:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:26:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45768C7AA for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:26:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1682830173.25411.1301599565735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch) > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13833-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 19:28:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1676 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 19:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 53727 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53699 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53691 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299128C88D for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1279136458.25419.1301599686166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch Attached patch with changes from option(2) from my previous comment. I also cleaned up NetUtils.java warnings related to javadoc. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13834-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 19:28:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1765 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 54152 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54120 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54112 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1408C892 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <3966881.25424.1301599686300.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13835-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 20:05:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54494 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12227 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12199 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12191 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:05:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:05:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43858C85F for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:05:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1918520765.25552.1301601905734.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch updated patch > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13836-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:22:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85037 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 54506 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54436 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54323 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:23:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:23:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678338CE86 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <540167034.25581.1301602986420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014183#comment-13014183 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475153/HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.net.TestNetUtils +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/325//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/325//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/325//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13837-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:27:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86480 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 20:42:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 20:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 70627 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:35:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70602 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70594 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 20:35:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29D18C1EC for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2108069429.25599.1301603705728.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7215.trunk.patch) > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13838-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:27:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86654 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 79360 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79294 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79168 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:45:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:45:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3732A8C602 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2037130658.25635.1301604306222.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014193#comment-13014193 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475153/HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.net.TestNetUtils +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/326//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/326//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/326//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13839-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:35:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8721 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 21:25:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 21:25:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 38360 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:25:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38331 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38323 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 21:25:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:25:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:25:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F387A8C802 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:25:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <886508381.25788.1301606705994.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.debug.patch For some reason one of the test I am adding fails in hudson test, but works fine on my machine. Uploading a debug version of the patch to understand the problem. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13840-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:43:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70033 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 57842 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57806 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57798 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:43:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD76F8CC20 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1805516457.25797.1301607785772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014224#comment-13014224 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475156/HADOOP-7215.debug.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/327//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/327//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/327//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13841-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 21:53:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18774 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 68054 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68018 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68010 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:53:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FCC8CF78 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:53:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <676933154.25816.1301608385754.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch With debug log the test did not fail! Trying a new patch again. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13842-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 22:13:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76949 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 22:13:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 22:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 88958 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:13:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88850 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:13:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88774 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 22:13:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68918C509 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1849602207.25859.1301609585875.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014237#comment-13014237 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475157/HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.net.TestNetUtils +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/328//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/328//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/328//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13843-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 22:34:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67463 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 22:34:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 22:34:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 13321 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:34:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13294 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:34:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13286 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 22:34:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25448CD43 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <933976139.25917.1301610845792.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6949) Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014249#comment-13014249 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-6949: --------------------------------------------- The vote was [conducted|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201103.mbox/%3CAANLkTi=Z6jaYVbFTt3bAQRVsj7CuSKBcK1+ims079ss8@mail.gmail.com%3E] on the dev lists for common, hdfs, and mapreduce. I counted nine +1s and no -1s. We can commit it to 0.22. > Reduces RPC packet size for primitive arrays, especially long[], which is used at block reporting > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6949 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6949 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Navis > Assignee: Matt Foley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ObjectWritable.diff, arrayprim.patch, arrayprim_v4.patch, arrayprim_v5.patch, arrayprim_v6.patch, arrayprim_v7.patch > > Original Estimate: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 10m > > Current implementation of oah.io.ObjectWritable marshals primitive array types as general object array ; array type string + array length + (element type string + value)*n > It would not be needed to specify each element types for primitive arrays. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13844-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 22:42:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72713 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 20057 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20026 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20018 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:42:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:42:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E4C8CF85 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:42:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1931127282.25950.1301611325921.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.debug.patch Patch without debug fails. Trying patch with debug again... > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13845-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 23:00:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23323 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 23:00:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 23:00:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 33954 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:00:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33827 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:00:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33819 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 23:00:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:00:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC88C571 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:00:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <115374646.26008.1301612405913.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014265#comment-13014265 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475162/HADOOP-7215.debug.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.net.TestNetUtils +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/329//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/329//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/329//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13846-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 23:10:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72677 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 23:10:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 23:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 39298 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:10:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39264 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39255 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 23:10:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:10:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66888C90B for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:10:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <363371995.26050.1301613005743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch The reason tests are failing is: local host maps to 127.0.1.1 with no interface configured for it. Looks like the other tests use 127.0.0.1 for local host. Doing the same for the newly added test. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-13847-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Mar 31 23:28:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 66204 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66178 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66170 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:28:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84FB8CE86 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:28:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1284838577.26132.1301614085751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014278#comment-13014278 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12475167/HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch against trunk revision 1087159. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/330//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/330//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/330//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 1 04:31:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13A002504 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96301 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:31:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94838 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:31:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94819 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 04:31:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:31:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:31:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A006BB9C1 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <836774115.14005.1304224263168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7254) Programmatically start processes with JMX port open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Programmatically start processes with JMX port open ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: scripts Reporter: Tanping Wang Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 We propose a programmatic way to start processes with JMX enabled. This is the counter part of HDFS-1874. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 1 04:33:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A34972DFD for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96517 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:33:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96452 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:33:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96444 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 04:33:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:33:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:33:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34805BBA41 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 04:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1659309625.14009.1304224383211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <836774115.14005.1304224263168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7254) Programmatically start processes with JMX port open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027423#comment-13027423 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7254: -------------------------------------- Together with HDFS-1874, we enable hadoop startup scripts to grab JMX port from hdfs-site.xml as one of the properties and start processes with Jmx enabled. > Programmatically start processes with JMX port open > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > We propose a programmatic way to start processes with JMX enabled. This is the counter part of HDFS-1874. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 1 04:37:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F902E31 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96932 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:37:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96836 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:37:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96828 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 04:37:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:37:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:37:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F91DBBACD for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 04:37:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2068431797.14012.1304224623125.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <836774115.14005.1304224263168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7254) Programmatically start processes with JMX port open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7254: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7254.patch > Programmatically start processes with JMX port open > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7254.patch > > > We propose a programmatic way to start processes with JMX enabled. This is the counter part of HDFS-1874. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 17:48:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9036735FA for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67916 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 17:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67854 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 17:48:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67838 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 17:48:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:48:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:48:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C29ABE85E for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1821631581.15741.1304358483505.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 17:48:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E53135F1 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67895 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 17:48:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67847 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 17:48:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67831 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 17:48:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:48:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:48:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FC2BE858 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:48:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <724703962.15735.1304358483328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 18:30:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C5863C33 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61654 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:30:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61614 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61606 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 18:30:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:30:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C441BE493 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:30:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <307593864.15803.1304361003243.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 18:34:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72D8D3D51 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63728 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:34:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63699 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63691 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 18:34:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:34:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:34:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2BFBE5FE for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <894488730.15813.1304361243300.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7227.4.patch > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 18:34:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E1113D7D for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64364 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:34:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64319 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:34:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64255 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 18:34:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:34:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:34:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75215BE604 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1074701532.15819.1304361243476.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 18:52:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D6AB358D for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 746 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 713 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 703 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 18:52:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:52:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 18:52:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B99BEB23 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 18:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:52:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <164716696.15840.1304362323134.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027766#comment-13027766 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12477977/HADOOP-7227.4.patch against trunk revision 1097322. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/391//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/391//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/391//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 19:10:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62A65304B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36229 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36193 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36185 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:10:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:10:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0DFBE0C4 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <753902427.15901.1304363403304.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027776#comment-13027776 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 19:10:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 888923054 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36434 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36367 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36228 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 19:10:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:10:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 19:10:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588ECBE0C6 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1553371244.15903.1304363403359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: ipc Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature) Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:39:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C233D4D for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55630 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:39:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55575 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:39:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55567 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:39:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:39:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:39:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B4FBED10 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <271292767.16156.1304368744425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch - Revised patch to remove conf-pseudo packaging. - Renamed setup-single-node-hadoop.sh to hadoop-setup-single-node.sh - Symlink hadoop-config.sh to $PREFIX/libexec - Improved detection of user defined HADOOP_HOME > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:44:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DEA93E72 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64442 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:44:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64407 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:44:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64399 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:44:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:44:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:44:12 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71378BEEC7 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:43:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Amr Awadallah (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1514623975.16189.1304368984460.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027831#comment-13027831 ] Amr Awadallah commented on HADOOP-6255: --------------------------------------- I am out of office and will be slower than usual in responding to emails. If this is urgent then please call my cell phone (or send an SMS), otherwise I will reply to your email when I get back. Thanks for your patience, -- amr > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:44:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A01973E7E for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64705 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:44:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64653 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64645 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:44:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:44:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:44:14 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7CABEEF1 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <753058259.16227.1304368986441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027833#comment-13027833 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12477985/HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch against trunk revision 1097322. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/392//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:53:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F168234AE for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75253 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:53:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75225 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:53:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75214 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:53:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:53:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:53:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4773CBE1E4 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:53:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1790211818.16247.1304369583288.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7214: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 20:59:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C50CB36D5 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83484 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:59:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83403 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 20:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83306 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 20:59:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:59:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 20:59:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0273BE4BA for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 20:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:59:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1920717579.16335.1304369945849.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this! > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 21:13:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B53903DE4 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8534 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8397 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 21:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8349 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 21:13:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:13:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:13:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FEFBE9B7 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 21:13:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <189635228.16406.1304370784328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027849#comment-13027849 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7227: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #567 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/567/]) HADOOP-7227. Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. Contributed by jitendra. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:45:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69A853E73 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32991 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:45:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32964 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:45:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32956 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:45:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:45:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:45:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481F0BE664 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1149429540.16601.1304376303292.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Release Note: 1. Protocol version check is removed from proxy creation, instead version check is performed at server in every rpc call. 2. This change is backward incompatible because format of the rpc messages is changed to include client version, client method hash and rpc version. 3. rpc version is introduced which should change when the format of rpc messages is changed. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:47:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE3CD3CB2 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35452 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35418 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35410 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:47:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:47:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:47:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB0ABE72B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:47:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1792041693.16619.1304376423577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <545918969.3211.1299545460466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7170) Support UGI in FileContext API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey resolved HADOOP-7170. ------------------------------------------ Resolution: Duplicate This is duplicate of HADOOP-7171. > Support UGI in FileContext API > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7170 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > The FileContext API needs to support UGI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14373-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 22:54:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B12F83FD3 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44785 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44741 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44733 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CE5BE98B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1815350748.16636.1304376843655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027897#comment-13027897 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------- This patch seems to have broken MR. I'm getting: [junit] 11/05/02 15:51:51 ERROR mapred.TaskTracker: Caught exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalAccessException: Class org.apache.hadoop.ipc.WritableRpcEngine$Invocation can not access a member of class org.apache.hadoop.mapred.InterTrackerProtocol with modifiers "public static final" [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.WritableRpcEngine$Invocation.(WritableRpcEngine.java:85) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.WritableRpcEngine$Invoker.invoke(WritableRpcEngine.java:249) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.$Proxy7.getBuildVersion(Unknown Source) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:1500) in a tight loop. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:00:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1124B34F0 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57310 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57277 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57261 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:00:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:00:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED4BBEB99 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <845863001.16682.1304377204384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027902#comment-13027902 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6255: -------------------------------------------- bq. I'm still a little concerned that the deployment document talks about things that are outside the scope of this JIRA. Even worse, it mentions things that Apache cannot distribute (the LZO code). This should really get sanitized for Hadoop. A valid point indeed. I think having packing outside of the project itself will address such concerns with ease, because packaging can be licensed differently than Hadoop proper. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:00:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AA8E34F7 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57347 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57279 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57262 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:00:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:00:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:00:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A737BEBA0 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:00:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <953475594.16688.1304377204564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027903#comment-13027903 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------- I believe we either need to make all protocols public interfaces, or we need to call setAccessible(true) on the Field instance. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:02:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B78173DC0 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58414 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58384 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58376 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:02:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8B7BEC7B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2045225725.16697.1304377323388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027904#comment-13027904 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------- Making InterTrackerProtocol public got past that issue, but now hitting: [junit] java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access class org.apache.hadoop.mapred.HeartbeatResponse from class $Proxy7 [junit] at $Proxy7.heartbeat(Unknown Source) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.transmitHeartBeat(TaskTracker.java:1692) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.offerService(TaskTracker.java:1523) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker.run(TaskTracker.java:2428) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MiniMRCluster$TaskTrackerRunner.run(MiniMRCluster.java:229) I am going to temporarily revert this patch from common, since it was insufficiently tested and is breaking the dependent projects. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:02:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7338E3E00 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58725 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58618 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58542 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:02:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D217BEC82 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <654164627.16704.1304377323575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reopened HADOOP-7227: --------------------------------- > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:06:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FDD367B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63764 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:06:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63714 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63706 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:06:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:06:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:06:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C519BED6F for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:06:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1783166029.16710.1304377563309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027905#comment-13027905 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7227: ---------------------------------------------- I am running mr tests to look into the issue. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 2 23:24:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44A6D3D1A for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77256 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:24:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77178 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 23:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77170 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 23:24:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 23:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A324BE295 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 23:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1830219609.16756.1304378643234.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027916#comment-13027916 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7227: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #568 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/568/]) Revert HADOOP-7227 from r1098792 since it broke HDFS and MR builds. ( svn merge -c -1098792 ) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 01:50:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DABE436A5 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 01:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33020 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 01:50:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32969 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 01:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32927 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 01:50:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 01:50:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 01:50:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576A9BEBA0 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 01:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 01:50:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <76604007.17212.1304387403354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7255) Performance regression bug caused by locking code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Performance regression bug caused by locking code ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7255 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 Reporter: T Jake Luciani While testing the 0.20.203 branch we have discovered quite a severe performance regression caused by the following checkin: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1079260 This locking seems to cause a pause of a few seconds between tasks, example with DFSIOTest: *CURRENT CODE* {noformat} 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:16:28 EDT 2011 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 303.3980582524272 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 327.69122314453125 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 78.95767116969083 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 19.476 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: {noformat} *WITH PATCH REMOVED* {noformat} 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:19:03 EDT 2011 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 366.03221083455344 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 366.35528564453125 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 11.020931463080379 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 3.543 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 05:35:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C58DD1B for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92955 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:35:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92869 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92861 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 05:35:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901E5BF031 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 05:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <9109019.17508.1304400903587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1720286243.52045.1302604686655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7221) When Namenode network is unplugged, DFSClient operations waits for ever MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028030#comment-13028030 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HADOOP-7221: ------------------------------------------------ The problem was whenever network was unplugged the read operation was getting a timedout exception and it was trying again. This continued for almost 15 times and only then some connectionloss exception came and could come out. By this time it was taking around 45 mins. Hence we have done something like, configure the parameter "max.ping.retries.on.socket.timeout" to a value where you can configure a value after which it should come out after getting a socket time. So while retrying chk for this configured value and once reached come out. This problem comes only in unplug scenarios. So based on the scenario this value can be configured as to when how much time it should chk to get a connection. > When Namenode network is unplugged, DFSClient operations waits for ever > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7221 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7221 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > When NN/DN is shutdown gracefully, the DFSClient operations which are waiting for a response from NN/DN, will throw exception & come out quickly > But when the NN/DN network is unplugged, the DFSClient operations which are waiting for a response from NN/DN, waits for ever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 05:45:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25FBA26F0 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99327 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:45:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99265 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99175 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 05:45:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:45:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:45:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F86BF4E6 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 05:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1278903595.17547.1304401503168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <76604007.17212.1304387403354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7255) Performance regression bug caused by locking code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028039#comment-13028039 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7255: -------------------------------------------- Thanks for posting performance data. Can you please let us know the test setup details? Like how big is your cluster? It is interesting to see high Std Deviation without the patch. Did you try multiple runs? > Performance regression bug caused by locking code > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > > While testing the 0.20.203 branch we have discovered quite a severe performance regression caused by the following checkin: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1079260 > This locking seems to cause a pause of a few seconds between tasks, example with DFSIOTest: > *CURRENT CODE* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:16:28 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 303.3980582524272 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 327.69122314453125 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 78.95767116969083 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 19.476 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} > *WITH PATCH REMOVED* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:19:03 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 366.03221083455344 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 366.35528564453125 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 11.020931463080379 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 3.543 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 05:51:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3AE927BB for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3116 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:51:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2814 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 05:51:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2494 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 05:51:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:51:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:51:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E61BF7A4 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 05:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 05:51:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1002036916.17572.1304401863422.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <76604007.17212.1304387403354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7255) Performance regression bug caused by locking code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028040#comment-13028040 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7255: -------------------------------------------- Correction: Std deviation is high with patch. > Performance regression bug caused by locking code > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > > While testing the 0.20.203 branch we have discovered quite a severe performance regression caused by the following checkin: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1079260 > This locking seems to cause a pause of a few seconds between tasks, example with DFSIOTest: > *CURRENT CODE* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:16:28 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 303.3980582524272 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 327.69122314453125 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 78.95767116969083 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 19.476 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} > *WITH PATCH REMOVED* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:19:03 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 366.03221083455344 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 366.35528564453125 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 11.020931463080379 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 3.543 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 06:33:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 471C72953 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31605 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:33:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31398 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31315 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 06:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:33:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3180BBF51B for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 06:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <389402084.17703.1304404383199.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7227.5.patch New patch calls setAccessible(true) for versionID field. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 06:35:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B55202C92 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35251 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:35:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35229 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35213 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 06:35:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:35:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEFCBF5FA for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 06:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <85220738.17711.1304404503115.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 06:58:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 432042340 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53708 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:58:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53613 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 06:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53598 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 06:58:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:58:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C405BFF18 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 06:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 06:58:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1816590255.17759.1304405883177.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028073#comment-13028073 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478032/HADOOP-7227.5.patch against trunk revision 1098840. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/393//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/393//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/393//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 11:35:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9019F21F8 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14251 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 11:35:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14207 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 11:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14175 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 11:35:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 11:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 11:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3807EBF04C for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "T Jake Luciani (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1547087401.18257.1304422503226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <76604007.17212.1304387403354.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7255) Performance regression bug caused by locking code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028162#comment-13028162 ] T Jake Luciani commented on HADOOP-7255: ---------------------------------------- For simplicity this is a single node from a fresh checkout. Yes I did run this multiple times... the stddev varies on read from 78 - 30... writes are fine in terms of stddev. If you build the test jar you should be able to reproduce locally. > Performance regression bug caused by locking code > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: T Jake Luciani > > While testing the 0.20.203 branch we have discovered quite a severe performance regression caused by the following checkin: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1079260 > This locking seems to cause a pause of a few seconds between tasks, example with DFSIOTest: > *CURRENT CODE* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:16:28 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 303.3980582524272 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 327.69122314453125 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 78.95767116969083 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 19.476 > 11/05/02 21:16:28 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} > *WITH PATCH REMOVED* > {noformat} > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Mon May 02 21:19:03 EDT 2011 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 5 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 500 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 366.03221083455344 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 366.35528564453125 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 11.020931463080379 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 3.543 > 11/05/02 21:19:03 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 13:31:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BAC4927 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 13:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94827 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 13:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94285 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 13:31:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94122 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 13:31:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 13:31:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 13:31:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4777BBFC88 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1487106568.18479.1304429463289.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028219#comment-13028219 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7227: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #677 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/677/]) Revert HADOOP-7227 from r1098792 since it broke HDFS and MR builds. ( svn merge -c -1098792 ) HADOOP-7227. Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. Contributed by jitendra. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 15:20:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2511E294A for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82807 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 15:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82760 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 15:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82752 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 15:20:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C7BF9DA for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <704905605.18945.1304436003603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1720286243.52045.1302604686655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7221) When Namenode network is unplugged, DFSClient operations waits for ever MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028262#comment-13028262 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7221: ---------------------------------------- # which version are you seeing this on? # when you say unplugged, do you mean the ethernet port of your local machine came unplugged, or the connection to the remote server failed? # Can you add the stack trace you see in the exceptions, to show where the problem is? This is an HDFS problem, so re-assigning there > When Namenode network is unplugged, DFSClient operations waits for ever > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7221 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7221 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: hdfs client > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > When NN/DN is shutdown gracefully, the DFSClient operations which are waiting for a response from NN/DN, will throw exception & come out quickly > But when the NN/DN network is unplugged, the DFSClient operations which are waiting for a response from NN/DN, waits for ever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 15:20:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FF332959 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83028 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 15:20:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82994 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 15:20:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82979 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 15:20:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0265BF9DC for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7256 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2 Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Priority: Minor Problem Statement: =============== There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. Scenario ======= During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. Solution: ======= While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: ===================================== We have many wrapped stream for writing and reading. These wrappers are prone to errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:15:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAFED2D3C for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82950 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82893 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82885 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E76DBF874 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <166057275.19192.1304442903383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028319#comment-13028319 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------------------ +1 the new patch looks good. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E60B22D48 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83153 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83119 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82996 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B500BF876 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1414292993.19194.1304442903436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028320#comment-13028320 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7227: ---------------------------------------------- I ran hdfs tests and mr tests with this patch in common. hdfs: All tests pass except TestHdfsTrash, TestReplaceDatanodeOnFailure, TestMetaSave which failed for unrelated reasons mr: All tests passed except TestMiniMRChildTask which also failed for unrelated reason. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:21:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A072145 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90216 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90165 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90155 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:21:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:21:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DB0BFA69 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <572111323.19204.1304443263147.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:23:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC6B32186 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91730 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:23:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91700 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:23:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91692 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:23:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:23:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:23:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BF8BFB3E for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:23:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1727467717.19215.1304443383413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7227.6.patch Similar change as previous one in fetchServerMethods in ProtocolProxy as well. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:25:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED1972236 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97878 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:25:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97839 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:25:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97831 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:25:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:25:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:25:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E77ABFC9B for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:25:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1351846868.19227.1304443503514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 17:49:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DDB72327 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51533 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:49:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51494 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 17:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51486 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 17:49:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:49:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 17:49:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E37BF711 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 17:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:49:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <487222198.19292.1304444943164.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028342#comment-13028342 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478070/HADOOP-7227.6.patch against trunk revision 1098840. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/394//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/394//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/394//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 18:01:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 127E12F3B for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75476 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:01:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75437 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75426 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 18:01:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:01:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:01:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99415BFD38 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1845876588.19344.1304445664624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley moved HDFS-1053 to HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.23.0 Key: HADOOP-7257 (was: HDFS-1053) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 18:19:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8CE92B66 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9610 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9563 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 18:19:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9530 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 18:19:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 18:19:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E0BBF374 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:19:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1639623250.19373.1304446743291.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028356#comment-13028356 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7257: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478021/viewFs3.patch against trunk revision 1098840. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 54 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1077 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1070 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 8 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 8 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/395//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/395//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/395//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/395//console This message is automatically generated. > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 19:00:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5A42980 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82829 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:00:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82803 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82795 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 19:00:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:00:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:00:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39CBF265 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Gzip codec should not return null decompressors ----------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7258 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Fix For: 0.20.203.0 Attachments: gzip-decomp.patch In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 19:00:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0256429EB for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84463 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:00:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84367 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84316 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 19:00:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:00:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C880BF267 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 19:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <734410995.19461.1304449203179.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7258: ---------------------------------- Attachment: gzip-decomp.patch This patch fixes the problem and the testcases. > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 19:02:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D6AD57B for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87828 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:02:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87793 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 19:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87783 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 19:02:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:02:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 19:02:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F631BF344 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 19:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 19:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1160942583.19468.1304449323256.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028369#comment-13028369 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7258: --------------------------------------- +1 Good catch > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 21:14:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDC932299 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19156 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:14:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19054 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19036 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 21:14:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:14:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C0EBF5F3 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <902118445.19780.1304457243466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028430#comment-13028430 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7179: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the change. > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 21:21:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E45FB2863 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25905 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25833 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25573 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:21:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F4BBF817 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1586276346.19791.1304457663492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-7179. ------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I committed the patch. > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 21:33:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 218982D1E for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46909 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46814 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46806 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 21:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:33:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85B2BFE07 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <805087598.19826.1304458383817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028444#comment-13028444 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7179: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #569 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/569/]) HADOOP-7179. Federation: Improve HDFS startup scripts. Contributed by Erik Steffl and Tanping Wang. > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 21:51:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE4F929D7 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65208 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:51:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65176 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 21:51:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65166 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 21:51:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:51:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:51:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0FAC043A for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 21:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:51:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <324434413.19867.1304459463308.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028456#comment-13028456 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------------------ +1 Minor: The following codes repeat twice. It may deserve putting them in a utility method. Otherwise, we won't miss the other "versionID" previously. {code} + try { + Field versionField = method.getDeclaringClass().getField("versionID"); + versionField.setAccessible(true); + clientVersion = versionField.getLong(method.getDeclaringClass()); + } catch (NoSuchFieldException ex) { + throw new RuntimeException(ex); + } catch (IllegalAccessException ex) { + throw new RuntimeException(ex); + } {code} > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 22:13:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA6AF2AFC for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96610 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96576 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96568 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:13:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:13:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A72C0D00 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:13:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2038968232.19928.1304460783281.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028467#comment-13028467 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7227: ---------------------------------------------- > The following codes repeat twice. It may deserve putting them in a utility method. That is correct! I would like to add a RPCUtil class and add a method there to get the version. I would prefer to do it in a separate patch as a refactor. Is that ok? > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 22:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FDC62E13 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99398 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99365 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99357 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 22:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDACC0DB7 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <266780624.19944.1304460903713.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028469#comment-13028469 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7227: ------------------------------------------------ Sure. Let's do it separately. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 22:15:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F25D2E21 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99633 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99596 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99588 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 22:15:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:15:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851D4C0DB1 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1999687775.19938.1304460903542.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <836774115.14005.1304224263168.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7254) Programmatically start processes with JMX port open MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7254: --------------------------------- Assignee: Tanping Wang > Programmatically start processes with JMX port open > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7254 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7254.patch > > > We propose a programmatic way to start processes with JMX enabled. This is the counter part of HDFS-1874. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 22:19:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A64EE2F97 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1715 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1684 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1676 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 22:19:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:19:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:19:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B6C0EFC for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <674568242.19953.1304461143263.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7179: --------------------------------- Assignee: Tanping Wang > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 3 22:33:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 819BB2686 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25180 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:33:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25153 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2011 22:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25145 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2011 22:33:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:33:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:33:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFE3C0413 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 22:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:33:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <440767403.20015.1304461984115.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028482#comment-13028482 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7227: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #570 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/570/]) HADOOP-7227. Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. Contributed by jitendra. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 05:22:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7974B3707 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88247 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88101 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:22:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88078 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 05:22:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:22:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:22:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F55CC04F1 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:22:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1233194207.20852.1304486523125.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7258: ---------------------------------- Attachment: fix.patch I messed up the previous patch by putting the annotation on the constructor rather than the class. I fix the definition of the annotation to only apply to types and put it in the right place. > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: fix.patch, gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 05:40:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E97033D0E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96445 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96242 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96230 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 05:40:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:40:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:40:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793A1C08E0 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Soren Macbeth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <990187855.20862.1304487603493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6945) Inclusion of Old Jackson-JSON Breaks tasks using Avro (or any task depending on Jackson JSON) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028616#comment-13028616 ] Soren Macbeth commented on HADOOP-6945: --------------------------------------- +1 It's a pain in the butt to have to strip this out of all the nodes in our cluster. Please either remove it or bump the version to a much more recent one. > Inclusion of Old Jackson-JSON Breaks tasks using Avro (or any task depending on Jackson JSON) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6945 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6945 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Greg Wittel > > HADOOP-6184 added the ability to serialize the Configuration to JSON. However its inclusion of jackson-1.0.1 means that any map-reduce task that depends (directly or indirectly) on Jackson, can only use Jackson 1.0.1 APIs. The 100% fix is to give the task's classpath priority over the core/common classpath (MAPREDUCE-1700/MAPREDUCE-1938) so that a job can use newer revisions of the library. > For a nearer term fix, is it possible to upgrade the included Jackson library to a recent version (1.5.x+)? The APIs are backwards compatible. alernatively, its possible to eliminate the use of Jackson for this minor feature as the Configuration object could be serialized to JSON without a 3rd party library. > An ancilliary issue is that the jackson.version referenced in ivy.xml is never specified in the source tree (ivy/libraries.properties). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 05:42:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADA813D21 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96921 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:42:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96764 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:42:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96743 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 05:42:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:42:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:42:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443C0C09B2 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1878769507.20867.1304487723276.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-4858) to add appropriate reference to the dependent library files in the chukwa/build.xml file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley closed HADOOP-4858. --------------------------------- > to add appropriate reference to the dependent library files in the chukwa/build.xml file > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4858 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4858 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > While going through the chukwa/build.xml 's package-hadoop target found that we are trying to copy jsp-api.jar from the hadoop/lib dir but actually the jsp-api. jar resides in chukwa/lib directory. > For more details see comment > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4709?focusedCommentId=12654489#action_12654489 > -Giri -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 05:42:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CAC53D4B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98026 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:42:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97971 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 05:42:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97737 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 05:42:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:42:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:42:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ABEC09AE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 05:42:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <549599084.20865.1304487723212.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-4858) to add appropriate reference to the dependent library files in the chukwa/build.xml file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-4858. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem Chukwa moved out long ago. > to add appropriate reference to the dependent library files in the chukwa/build.xml file > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4858 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4858 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > While going through the chukwa/build.xml 's package-hadoop target found that we are trying to copy jsp-api.jar from the hadoop/lib dir but actually the jsp-api. jar resides in chukwa/lib directory. > For more details see comment > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4709?focusedCommentId=12654489#action_12654489 > -Giri -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 06:12:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 354EB39B4 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36373 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:12:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36235 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36210 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 06:12:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:12:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:12:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380B8C021E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 06:12:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Fix For: 0.20.203.0 Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 06:16:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F4AC3FC3 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47418 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47302 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46578 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 06:16:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:16:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:16:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5B5C0399 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 06:16:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1291166686.20963.1304489763112.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7259: ---------------------------------- Attachment: contrib.patch The contrib modules should pick up the build.properties from the enclosing hadoop build. > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 06:30:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F7483316 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58887 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:30:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58849 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 06:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58673 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 06:30:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:30:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:30:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E796C090A for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 06:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 06:30:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1696113784.21006.1304490603514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7259: ---------------------------------- Component/s: build > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 11:14:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7D7B379B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99403 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99373 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 11:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99353 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 11:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63658C16EE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1985359307.21407.1304507643404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028710#comment-13028710 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7227: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #678 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/678/]) HADOOP-7227. Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. Contributed by jitendra. > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 11:14:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0D2137A0 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99491 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99376 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99352 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 11:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 11:14:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ADEC16E8 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <415745918.21401.1304507643204.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <818390768.11760.1299787865337.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7179) Improve HDFS startup scripts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028709#comment-13028709 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7179: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #678 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/678/]) HADOOP-7179. Federation: Improve HDFS startup scripts. Contributed by Erik Steffl and Tanping Wang. > Improve HDFS startup scripts > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7179 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7179 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7179.patch > > > Startup scripts should start namenodes, secondary namenodes and datanodes on hosts returned by getConfig (new feature of HDFS Federation). This jira is Hdfs counterpart of HDFS-1703. This patch makes changes to hadoop-config.sh and slaves.sh where they belong to COMMON project. And HDFS-1703 modifies scripts, hdfs, start-hdfs.sh and stop-hdfs.sh where they go to HDFS project. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 13:56:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FCA332DE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74602 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 13:56:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74491 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 13:56:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74483 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 13:56:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F9CC1B52 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <294652392.21656.1304517363536.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1991821639.8902.1299699839419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7176) Redesign FsShell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028751#comment-13028751 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7176: ------------------------------------- This bug is implicitly fixing bugs in all the commands regarding handling of globs and exit codes of 0 when multiple args and/or globs are supplied and have errors. If anyone has available time, I'd like to please request reviews for the linked bugs. Thanks in advance. > Redesign FsShell > ---------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7176 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The FsShell commands are very tightly coupled together which makes it necessarily hard to write new commands. There is a lot of redundancy between the commands, inconsistencies in handling of paths, handling of errors, and correct return of exit codes. The FsShell commands should be subclasses of the fs.shell.Command class which is already being used by the -count command, and is used by other commands like dfsadmin. > This will serve as an umbrella bug to track the changes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 14:12:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAC623B7B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 14:12:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8102 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 14:12:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7886 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 14:12:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:12:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:12:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36468C11E9 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 14:12:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1400941320.21693.1304518323219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6945) Inclusion of Old Jackson-JSON Breaks tasks using Avro (or any task depending on Jackson JSON) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028755#comment-13028755 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6945: ---------------------------------------- given that Jackson is only used to serialize the config, and also that generating valid JSON is fairly straightforward, why not get rid of the jackson dependency at all and just have a json serializer class? jackson (or something like json-lib or gson) could just be used to validate the content in the unit tests. > Inclusion of Old Jackson-JSON Breaks tasks using Avro (or any task depending on Jackson JSON) > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6945 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6945 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Greg Wittel > > HADOOP-6184 added the ability to serialize the Configuration to JSON. However its inclusion of jackson-1.0.1 means that any map-reduce task that depends (directly or indirectly) on Jackson, can only use Jackson 1.0.1 APIs. The 100% fix is to give the task's classpath priority over the core/common classpath (MAPREDUCE-1700/MAPREDUCE-1938) so that a job can use newer revisions of the library. > For a nearer term fix, is it possible to upgrade the included Jackson library to a recent version (1.5.x+)? The APIs are backwards compatible. alernatively, its possible to eliminate the use of Jackson for this minor feature as the Configuration object could be serialized to JSON without a 3rd party library. > An ancilliary issue is that the jackson.version referenced in ivy.xml is never specified in the source tree (ivy/libraries.properties). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 16:00:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0158F3581 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34734 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:00:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34697 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34689 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:00:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:00:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F34C193F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1876422467.21868.1304524803229.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028794#comment-13028794 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7236: ------------------------------------ It looks generally good, and this refactoring is very good for the FsShell. However, I think John George was on the right track when he questioned adding mkdirs(), etc., methods to the PathData class. We seem to already be creating FileContext as a mirror of all FS methods, we shouldn't do the same with PathData. To me it seems obvious that the invocation of mkdirs(), rightly removed from FSCommand, should be located in the Mkdir class. Daryl and I talked about various ways to try to "simplify the switch to FileContext". We concluded (or at least I did -- sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth :-) ) that we were going through contortions to avoid changing twenty single lines in twenty different files at some point in the future; i.e., converting the invocations of FileSystem methods to FileContext methods in each of the implementations of the various FSCommands. While it would be nice to avoid that future editing, it isn't worth complicating the design, in my opinion. And isn't it kind of the point of all this that each command (or related subset of commands) can become a separate subclass of FSCommand? Thanks. > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 16:18:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37EE39AC for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64446 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:18:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64392 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:18:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64295 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:18:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:18:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4079DC1FCB for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:18:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2083247729.21941.1304525884260.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7236: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7236-3.patch I agree, it felt a little awkward. My motivation was to simplify the move to FileContext or the next new and improved api. That said, you won me over, I'm fine with switching it back. > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 16:40:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE7823A1F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11088 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11050 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11042 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:40:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293FFC16ED for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <7782194.22007.1304527203165.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028815#comment-13028815 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7236: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478175/HADOOP-7236-3.patch against trunk revision 1099284. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/396//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/396//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/396//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 16:40:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFFD93A2E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11346 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11313 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11305 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:40:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:40:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397DCC16EF for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1257697462.22009.1304527203232.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028816#comment-13028816 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7251: ------------------------------------ I understand that the lifetime of the Merge object is only a single invocation, but I would prefer to have Merge.delimiter conditionally set to either null or "\n" at the decision point in processOptions(), in addition to being initialized to null by ctor. It's just to remove concern about re-use, or in case the object ever changes to be re-used. > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 16:58:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F57D800 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32528 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32480 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32388 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:58:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:58:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496ACC1C60 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:58:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2041470620.22033.1304528283297.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <393899407.59444.1302827766144.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7227) Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7227: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) This has been committed! > Remove protocol version check at proxy creation in Hadoop RPC. > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7227 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7227 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7227.2.patch, HADOOP-7227.3.patch, HADOOP-7227.4.patch, HADOOP-7227.5.patch, HADOOP-7227.6.patch > > > Currently when a proxy is created for a protocol, there is a round trip of messages to check the protocol version. The protocol version is not checked in any subsequent rpc which could be a problem if the server restarts with a new protocol version. This issue and also the additional round-trip at proxy creation can be avoided if we add the protocol version in every rpc, and server checks the protocol version for every call. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 17:14:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FD2A3245 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65329 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65300 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65291 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00AAC1241 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <386358151.22074.1304529243848.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7251: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7251-2.patch Thanks for the comments! The method parseOptions is now explicitly defining the delimiter to be null or newline in event of re-use -- which isn't currently possible, but is a good idea. I'm not sure I understand the value of adding a ctor to explicitly set an instance var to null, when the instance var is already initialized to null? Did I misunderstand? > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 17:14:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4A223257 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65856 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65819 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65807 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510FAC124F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:14:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1911524473.22087.1304529244328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028830#comment-13028830 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- {quote} A valid point indeed. I think having packing outside of the project itself will address such concerns with ease, because packaging can be licensed differently than Hadoop proper. {quote} There can be a LZ0 rpm as add-on, this integration project is extensible. Hadoop works properly without LZ0. Hence, the integration jira for Hadoop should focus on stuff on Apache only. Commercial vendors are aggregating hadoop related technologies to make a proper distribution for commercial use. People who wants effortless Hadoop setup can choose to pay commercial vendors for their effort and certification. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 17:38:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 929913206 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7587 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:38:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7554 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7546 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 17:38:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:38:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:38:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1F6C1C76 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:38:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1706452162.22228.1304530683181.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028844#comment-13028844 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7251: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478182/HADOOP-7251-2.patch against trunk revision 1099284. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/397//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/397//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/397//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 17:42:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B613B3312 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16051 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:42:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16019 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 17:42:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16011 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 17:42:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:42:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 17:42:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC63C1EAE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <59844505.22259.1304530923245.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028848#comment-13028848 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7259: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 19:33:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0E523ADD for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82549 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82495 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82233 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:33:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6620CC191C for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1736574369.22575.1304537583414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 19:41:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78649304A for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92638 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:41:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92606 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:41:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92598 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 19:41:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:41:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:41:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9D4C1D1A for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <622590916.22625.1304538063912.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------- Attachment: viewFs4.patch Updated patch: Fixed findbug and compiler warnings > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 19:41:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4713D3057 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92887 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:41:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92854 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 19:41:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92846 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 19:41:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:41:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:41:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CF2C1D2F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1664310542.22644.1304538064540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 20:00:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 178353E03 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21001 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:00:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20971 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:00:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20958 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:00:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:00:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 20:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD49C1324 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 20:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1058229005.22687.1304539203180.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028924#comment-13028924 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7257: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478200/viewFs4.patch against trunk revision 1099284. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 54 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1072 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1070 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 2 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/398//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/398//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/398//console This message is automatically generated. > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 21:27:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C22443521 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35724 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:27:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35691 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:27:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35682 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:27:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:27:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:27:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2780CC12DE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <174433715.22915.1304544423158.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028972#comment-13028972 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7250: ------------------------------------ +1 code reviewed > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 21:29:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C2635A2 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36977 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36915 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36907 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:29:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:29:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1438C13CC for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:29:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1966277966.22932.1304544543657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028977#comment-13028977 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7236: ------------------------------------ +1 Thanks. > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 21:33:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60A5C37BB for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41177 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41148 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:33:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41140 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:33:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:33:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:33:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B549C14F6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <998353546.22935.1304544784043.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028978#comment-13028978 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7251: ------------------------------------ Never mind about the ctor, I wasn't expressing myself clearly. This new patch changed exactly what I asked for. +1. > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 21:37:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9F933B5D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45665 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45568 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45518 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:37:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:37:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:37:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670A6C16F3 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1319698382.22958.1304545023419.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7236: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks John and Matt for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 21:55:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0CC13628 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76163 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:55:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76135 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 21:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76127 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:55:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:55:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:55:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230BDC1D87 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:55:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <784601101.23006.1304546104140.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028994#comment-13028994 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7236: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #571 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/571/]) HADOOP-7236. Refactor the mkdir command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:15:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71DB53326 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9370 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9338 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9330 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:15:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:15:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EE0C13C7 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1655011592.23071.1304547303131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7250: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7250-2.patch Fix minor merge conflicts. > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7250-2.patch, HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:34:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E00F3DBD for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43495 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:34:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43457 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43449 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:34:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:34:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:34:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DB3C1A4E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:34:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <685568109.23104.1304548443200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029016#comment-13029016 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7250: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478221/HADOOP-7250-2.patch against trunk revision 1099612. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/399//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/399//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/399//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7250-2.patch, HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:52:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFBAB3417 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62482 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:52:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62444 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:52:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62435 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:52:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:52:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:52:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543F2C1F47 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:52:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <399396215.23138.1304549523341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7214.7.patch Updated patch which switches designs to use a separate protocol. Note that in this patch I renamed {{RefreshUserMappingsProtocol}} to {{UserGroupMappingProtocol}}. The only other changes in this file are bumping the protocol version ID and adding the {{getGroupsForUser}} method. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 22:56:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC86F354B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69569 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69531 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69516 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:56:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:56:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:56:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E38C1118 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:56:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <65067986.23161.1304549763328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:02:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38BC33257 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72976 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:02:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72776 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72768 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:02:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:02:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:02:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5485EC1266 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1881795690.23167.1304550123342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7250: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks Matt for the review. > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7250-2.patch, HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:04:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB4723AE1 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75362 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:04:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75307 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75299 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:04:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:04:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A9CC133C for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:04:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1881620011.23176.1304550243359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029030#comment-13029030 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7250: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #572 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/572/]) HADOOP-7250. Refactor the setrep command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7250-2.patch, HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:14:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE2CD3CB9 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89766 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89733 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89725 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:14:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D24C1589 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <662529156.23193.1304550843290.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029035#comment-13029035 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478225/hadoop-7214.7.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1071 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1070 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/400//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/400//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/400//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/400//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:16:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C686325E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92388 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92356 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92348 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:16:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:16:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:16:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BC3C163E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:16:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1709984454.23203.1304550963217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029039#comment-13029039 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7238: ------------------------------------ I especially like the re-implementation of printToStdout() as IOUtils.copyBytes(). Didn't read all the nitty-gritty details of the implementation that DIDN'T change, I assume you transcribed them correctly. +1 code review. > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:40:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A392739C4 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17890 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17856 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17848 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:40:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35418C1C72 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <861057822.23235.1304552403215.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7214.8.patch Patch which adds a missing license header and fixes the single javac warning. The tests for this feature are in MR and HDFS. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 4 23:54:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AF623F94 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28247 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28113 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28105 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 23:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 23:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A54AC1FAA for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 23:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1264500345.23249.1304553243170.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029055#comment-13029055 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478229/hadoop-7214.8.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/401//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/401//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/401//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 00:57:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F3893C92 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90499 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:57:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90412 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 00:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90404 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 00:57:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:57:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 00:57:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2519FC1E40 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 00:57:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <464525365.23323.1304557023148.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik reassigned HADOOP-7157: ------------------------------------------ Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:03:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55B0447B for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95957 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:03:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95912 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95904 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:03:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:03:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:03:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550ABC00DA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:03:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <880764344.23365.1304557383344.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7157: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7157.patch Initial puppet recipe to keep the configuration of build system in check. > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:15:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6169BDF for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9783 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9745 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9737 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF3FC054F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1625631234.23387.1304558103385.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029083#comment-13029083 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7157: -------------------------------------------- The following steps are needed to bootstrap puppet and keeping build configuration in check: - download puppet [2.6.8|http://puppetlabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-2.6.8.tar.gz]. Unpack and install it by running puppet/install.rb - run recipe (with superuser privileges): {noformat} puppet apply --debug src/build.env/default-env.puppet {noformat} Running this with {{--noop}} will effectively execute dry-run I propose these steps are to be done say once a day on every build machine. The set of packages/versions proposed is what we have on Apache Hadoop build machines at the moment. > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27F24BFB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10006 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9977 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9969 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FACEC055C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1013476244.23396.1304558103651.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7157: --------------------------------------- Component/s: build > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:37:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A36373E07 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30987 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:37:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30959 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30950 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:37:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:37:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:37:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD37C0A0F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:37:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <40024282.23421.1304559423192.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------- Attachment: viewFs5.patch > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:39:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5DFB3E55 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32894 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32860 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32852 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:39:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:39:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:39:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FB2C0ACB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:39:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Roman Shaposhnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1194699545.23443.1304559543234.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029090#comment-13029090 ] Roman Shaposhnik commented on HADOOP-7157: ------------------------------------------ In general -- a strong +1 on the approach. H/W tends to go down, being decommissioned and tinkered with so having a reliable way to re-deploy a particular build/test environment is extremely important. Puppet fits the bill perfectly. Now, a couple of points on Puppet usage: 1. Not sure you need precise version strings for the kinds of packages that are specified (and not all of them are specified, actually) 2. Minor nit: you can simplify an implementation by using an array syntax for resource instantiation 3. What's your plan on applying proposed recipe? I think it would be nice to have a cron job that would check it out from the apache repo and apply > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 01:54:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FF703478 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44756 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44704 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 01:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44696 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 01:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 01:54:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED97EC1043 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 01:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1638134187.23489.1304560443969.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029099#comment-13029099 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7257: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478238/viewFs5.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 54 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/402//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/402//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/402//console This message is automatically generated. > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 05:01:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58EA82E54 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 05:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57378 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:01:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57291 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:01:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57283 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 05:01:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:01:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:01:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079EC24E9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 05:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 05:01:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <443243169.23599.1304571663129.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029125#comment-13029125 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7214: ------------------------------------- - What's the point of the "helper method to get the current user" since it's just wrapping another method directly? Seems silly. - We need to make sure we commit this at the same time as we commit the MR and HDFS changes, right? (ie this will break the build if we don't?) > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 05:19:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A0BC2054 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 05:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65036 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64821 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 05:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64812 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 05:19:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:19:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 05:19:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A22C27C7 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 05:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 05:19:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1464984546.23624.1304572743146.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029130#comment-13029130 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7214: ---------------------------------------- bq. What's the point of the "helper method to get the current user" since it's just wrapping another method directly? Seems silly. Happy to remove it. It is only a very slight convenience. bq. We need to make sure we commit this at the same time as we commit the MR and HDFS changes, right? (ie this will break the build if we don't?) Absolutely. Unless we do what I just suggested in MAPREDUCE-2473, i.e. don't modify the existing {{RefreshUserMappings}} interface, and instead make a separate interface just for fetching. Let me know if that sounds good to you and I'll go ahead and make those changes. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:23:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A956821A1 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28483 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:23:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28235 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28201 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:23:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:23:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:23:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E07BC295F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 06:23:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1432096816.23785.1304576583381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7214.9.patch Updated patch addressing Todd's comments. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:43:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A60652C28 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61090 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:43:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60974 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60958 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:43:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:43:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8FFC2FCA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 06:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <594914770.23848.1304577783378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029176#comment-13029176 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478250/hadoop-7214.9.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/403//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/403//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/403//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/403//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 06:49:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DA8821DA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68563 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:49:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68405 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 06:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68367 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 06:49:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:49:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 06:49:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158DC22BB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 06:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 06:49:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <15136292.23879.1304578143264.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7214.10.patch Attaching the patch to the right JIRA this time. :P > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 07:03:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31E652658 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83862 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 07:03:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83427 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 07:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83352 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 07:03:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 07:03:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 07:03:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DF7C27D9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 07:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 07:03:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <365101482.23930.1304578983340.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029197#comment-13029197 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478254/hadoop-7214.10.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/404//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/404//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/404//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 11:14:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06A4DBE6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85868 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85208 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84910 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 11:14:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:14:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEDFC2E45 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2029427239.24399.1304594043307.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <444776842.10957.1304053443189.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7250) Refactor FsShell's setrep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029285#comment-13029285 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7250: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #679 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/679/]) HADOOP-7250. Refactor the setrep command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's setrep > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7250 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7250-2.patch, HADOOP-7250.patch > > > Need to refactor setrep to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 11:14:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDFE7C04 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86408 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86384 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86376 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 11:14:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3687EC2E42 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1318714061.24396.1304594043219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912834846.74827.1303423325837.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7236) Refactor FsShell's mkdir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029284#comment-13029284 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7236: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #679 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/679/]) HADOOP-7236. Refactor the mkdir command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's mkdir > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7236 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7236-2.patch, HADOOP-7236-3.patch, HADOOP-7236.patch > > > Need to refactor tail to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 14:09:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB9E2CF6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76812 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 14:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76778 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 14:09:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76770 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 14:09:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 14:09:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 14:09:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27332C2FA7 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 14:09:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1008351639.24627.1304604543156.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029339#comment-13029339 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7238: ------------------------------------- Yes, the file magic checks and the TextRecordInputStream are not changed. Cut-n-paste. > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 15:21:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C74612BB9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 15:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17382 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 15:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17351 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 15:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17343 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 15:21:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 15:21:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 15:21:47 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6E4C2057 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 15:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 15:21:09 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2022424951.24759.1304608869173.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029367#comment-13029367 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7248: --------------------------------------- I've backported this change to the branch-0.20-security. I'm facing an issue in running the unit tests in eclipse where it can't find the webapps directory now. I see there was a jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 that went into 22 that worked around the issue. I'm looking for feedback if people think that is the proper thing to do or if I should have the build.xml copy it into the eclipse classpath or something else? I'm new to hadoop so am not familiar with all the use cases and processes yet. Also does anyone know if all the tests in the 20 branch were running via eclipse? > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:03:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B89522D44 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30136 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:03:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30106 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30098 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:03:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:03:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:03:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8FBC26EF for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991076716.25016.1304611384236.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6919: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:03:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B8702D6D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30643 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:03:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30601 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30593 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:03:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:03:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:03:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20D2C26FE for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:03:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <719077590.25029.1304611384726.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6919: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:05:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 117A22DBC for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33084 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33047 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33039 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:05:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:05:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:05:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AED4C27EA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2139695068.25057.1304611504631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6919: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:05:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7A6B2DCA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33351 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:05:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33306 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33298 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:05:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:05:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:05:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25981C27D5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <169369933.25044.1304611504149.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6919: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:09:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C92F420A4 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38200 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:09:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38165 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:09:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38148 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:09:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:09:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:09:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4157AC2999 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:09:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1559172546.25063.1304611743264.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu resolved HADOOP-6918. ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Release Note: Harmonizing metrics names Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change] We adopted CapitalizedCamelCase. > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 16:25:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B4932BC7 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84424 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:25:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84394 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 16:25:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84386 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 16:25:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:25:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:25:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5A6C21CD for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:25:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2004895807.25114.1304612703649.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029414#comment-13029414 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6919: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478290/hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 36 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/405//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/405//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/405//console This message is automatically generated. > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:01:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71B792C80 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54277 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54190 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:01:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53990 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:01:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:01:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:01:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A65C2085 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:01:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1983565491.25193.1304614863298.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029436#comment-13029436 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7157: -------------------------------------------- Thanks for the review. I will fix the patch to make it more compact with resource array and will post it shortly. As for applying: your #3 is pretty goes pretty much along with what I had in mind by saying "to be done say once a day". Storing it along with rest of Hadoop source base seems to be a logical thing to do too. > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:05:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5460B2A42 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61102 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:05:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61064 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:05:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61056 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:05:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:05:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:05:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70DBC2216 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:05:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <130482159.25201.1304615103811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029438#comment-13029438 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6918: ------------------------------------- This is resolved/fixed? This jira fix version 23 and in trunk the metrics names did not change, eg bytes_written is still bytes_written. > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:40:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D32FD2EFA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32010 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31957 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31949 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:40:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734A9C232D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <927542926.25333.1304617203469.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029457#comment-13029457 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6918: --------------------------------- Thanks for the comment, Eli, The purpose of the jira was to track the proposal/discussion of the changes. I should've commented that the actual changes will be covered by metrics instrumentation patches in HADOOP-6920, HDFS-1117 and MAPREDUCE-1738. > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 17:54:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 375E4278C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51091 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51058 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51050 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 17:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 17:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B856C2960 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <144382093.25377.1304618043371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves reassigned HADOOP-7248: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Thomas Graves > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:16:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D591946F7 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31978 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31948 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31932 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:16:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:16:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:16:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D43DC2352 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 18:16:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <979758589.25435.1304619363313.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029476#comment-13029476 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7214: ------------------------------------- Looks like the JavaDoc still refers to RefreshUserMappingsProtocol where it should refer to GetUserMappingsProtocol. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:20:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23E3120BC for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43754 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:20:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43675 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:20:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43667 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:20:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:20:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:20:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FF9C255D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 18:20:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1144595263.25464.1304619603353.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029482#comment-13029482 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6918: ------------------------------------- Thanks. Being consistent makes sense to me. Which jira will have a release note indicating the workaround for users (they'll need to rename according to the new names)? This jira seems like the best one to me since it's also flagged incompatible. > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:41:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9013F2EC6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78653 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78623 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78615 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:41:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:41:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:41:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAB8C2D09 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 18:41:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <974043849.25504.1304620863191.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029490#comment-13029490 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7249: ------------------------------------ Hi Daryn, generally looks good but in FsShellPermissions.parseOwnerGroup() a tab (instead of spaces) crept in to the added lines just below "group = null;", to wit: if (group != null && group.length() == 0) { - group = null; - } + group = null; + } <-- problem here, and possibly prev line > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:43:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80178203C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83059 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:43:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83028 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:43:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83020 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:43:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:43:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:43:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EFCC2DDC for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 18:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1748280070.25507.1304620983160.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029491#comment-13029491 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7249: ------------------------------------ {code} if (group != null && group.length() == 0) { - group = null; - } + group = null; + } <-- problem here, and possibly prev line {code} > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 18:51:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B04DE2B26 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10547 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:51:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10494 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:51:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10486 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:51:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:51:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:51:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E410C3192 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 18:51:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1830803980.25557.1304621463251.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7249: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7249-2.patch Removed tabs. > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 19:03:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 421722271 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46007 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:03:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45952 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:03:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45859 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 19:03:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:03:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:03:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E788C360C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <526658133.25588.1304622183449.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029505#comment-13029505 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7249: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478308/HADOOP-7249-2.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 10 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/406//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/406//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/406//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 19:13:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12751288C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65087 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:13:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65053 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:13:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65044 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 19:13:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:13:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:13:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB91C39CF for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:13:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <495384625.25619.1304622783507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7214.11.patch Thanks for the comments, Todd. I missed adding the file during the splitting of the protocol interfaces. Updated patch attached. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 19:33:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22192248F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98230 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:33:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98180 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 19:33:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98168 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 19:33:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:33:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 19:33:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D022C21A3 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1723001201.25702.1304623983312.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029525#comment-13029525 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7214: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478313/hadoop-7214.11.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/407//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/407//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/407//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 20:43:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34C0D20CA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 20:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16494 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 20:43:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16465 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 20:43:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16455 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 20:43:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 20:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 20:43:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371B9C3BD0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 20:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <210639408.25898.1304628183222.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029554#comment-13029554 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7249: ------------------------------------ +1 > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:21:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 193DD2D14 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61344 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61304 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61292 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:21:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:21:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599F1C3848 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <826874576.26062.1304630463364.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7260: ---------------------------------- Attachment: bylaws.patch > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:21:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 484922D34 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61783 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:21:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61735 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:21:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61727 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:21:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:21:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:21:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45458C3845 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org update the tlp site with the bylaws ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: documentation Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Fix For: site Attachments: bylaws.patch Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:29:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF679208D for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72645 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72612 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72603 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:29:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:29:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:29:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE83C3A91 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:29:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1613358262.26067.1304630943119.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029583#comment-13029583 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7260: ------------------------------------- +1 lgtm. I couldn't find the thread with the final bylaws but these look right to me, eg includes the latest amendments made to address Nigel's feedback. > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:33:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90CC522F4 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75820 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:33:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75788 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75780 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:33:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C7AC3BC0 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1181104140.26071.1304631183151.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7260. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:35:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA7282693 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81465 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:35:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81436 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:35:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81428 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:35:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:35:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:35:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614FAC3C64 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <485775719.26078.1304631303395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029585#comment-13029585 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7260: ------------------------------------- +1 lgtm too (assuming broken link is fixed). > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:41:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 129FA279E for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84988 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84961 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84953 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:41:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F7FC3E87 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1900828118.26109.1304631664611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch Rebase the patch for 0.20 security branch > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:41:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72BBF27ED for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86078 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86029 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86021 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6634AC3E68 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1268665495.26080.1304631663415.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029586#comment-13029586 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7260: --------------------------------------- I just fixed a minor typo that Nigel pointed out. > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:41:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B333A27FF for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86333 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86291 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86283 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55A6C3E89 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <605713660.26111.1304631664674.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2082135242.26059.1304630463280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7260) update the tlp site with the bylaws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley closed HADOOP-7260. --------------------------------- > update the tlp site with the bylaws > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7260 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7260 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: bylaws.patch > > > Include the bylaws in the tlp site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:41:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E44A3280C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86571 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86519 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86495 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:41:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:41:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35EEC3E90 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1440041838.26118.1304631664862.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch Rpm/deb packaging for Hadoop common trunk > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:43:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2377287A for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87918 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:43:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87893 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87885 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:43:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:43:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:43:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F71C3F5A for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1375501526.26153.1304631783340.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch Rpm/deb packaging for Hadoop trunk > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:43:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9012B288C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88206 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:43:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88168 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88160 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:43:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:43:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD77C3F79 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:43:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1121869318.26181.1304631784372.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029592#comment-13029592 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478334/HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 14 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/408//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:45:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A21302D49 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89687 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:45:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89647 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:45:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89639 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:45:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCD4C3029 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1819517316.26211.1304631903245.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch Rpm/deb packaging for Hadoop Mapred trunk > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:53:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69E992E61 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91856 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91826 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91813 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:53:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:53:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:53:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD479C32C9 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:53:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <515626176.26270.1304632383772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029597#comment-13029597 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478335/HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/409//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 21:55:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF3272EE6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94573 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94542 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94534 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:55:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:55:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC963C33B8 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2093241905.26316.1304632503769.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029600#comment-13029600 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6918: --------------------------------- bq. This jira seems like the best one to me since it's also flagged incompatible. Make sense, reopen. As for workaround, metrics sinks can be trivially enhanced to have user defined mappings, which is what we did for production deployment. > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:07:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C952CEC for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18846 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:07:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18744 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:07:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18728 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:07:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:07:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:07:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366B9C3715 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:07:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1065826906.26360.1304633223219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu reopened HADOOP-6918: ----------------------------- > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:09:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25E032DB6 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23074 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:09:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23033 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:09:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22996 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:09:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:09:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:09:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CA2C377E for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:09:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Disable IPV6 for junit tests ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7261 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.23.0 IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:13:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5AF22EC4 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31668 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31638 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31630 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:13:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:13:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:13:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45487C38A5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:13:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <617317558.26372.1304633583280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7261.patch > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:17:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F55D29E5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33639 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:17:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33516 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:17:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33508 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:17:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:17:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE1BC39F3 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:17:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1832774673.26386.1304633828704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029613#comment-13029613 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-7257: ---------------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:21:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F1872559 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37633 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37581 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37573 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:21:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:21:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F904C3C2A for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1901278751.26423.1304634063518.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029617#comment-13029617 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------- Should we include this in the contrib build.xml too? Otherwise +1 on the current patch. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:37:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C29172DFB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61405 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:37:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61373 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:37:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61365 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:37:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:37:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:37:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522EAC320C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:37:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1760864585.26482.1304635023333.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029628#comment-13029628 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ +1 on this patch > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 22:51:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 082A62661 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75078 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:51:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74954 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 22:51:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74838 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 22:51:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:51:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 22:51:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCE0C35BB for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <88444274.26521.1304635863323.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 5 23:03:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 033602B6F for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 23:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89286 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 23:03:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89158 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 23:03:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89132 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 23:03:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 23:03:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 23:03:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34978C3906 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 23:03:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <194387359.26552.1304636583212.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029641#comment-13029641 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7261: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478337/HADOOP-7261.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/410//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/410//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/410//console This message is automatically generated. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:08:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C2EF2B31 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56537 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:08:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56503 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56495 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:08:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:08:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:08:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589F6C3659 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:08:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <843095077.26651.1304640483359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch Exclude hadoop-env.sh.example from source code, pass in os.arch environment to rpmbuild command. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:12:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFE7D2BDB for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61057 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:12:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61022 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61014 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:12:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:12:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:12:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE85C37B4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:12:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1243982041.26690.1304640723316.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7261.1.patch Disabled ipv6 for contrib junit tests. I am not planning to run hudson validation for this. Will commit it once I get +1 for the patch. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:14:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB9092C65 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63002 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62971 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62963 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:14:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:14:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68F3C3865 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:14:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1198354370.26730.1304640844940.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029667#comment-13029667 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478351/HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/412//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:20:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E8512273 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69539 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:20:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69479 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:20:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69471 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:20:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:20:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:20:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8F4C3A3C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:20:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1581162493.26750.1304641203318.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029670#comment-13029670 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Looks right! Thanks Suresh for doing this, and thanks Nigel for the suggestion. +1 > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 00:24:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25E9F2309 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71389 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:24:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71360 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 00:24:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71352 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 00:24:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 00:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D49C3B34 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 00:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 00:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <461314629.26762.1304641443221.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029673#comment-13029673 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7261: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478352/HADOOP-7261.1.patch against trunk revision 1099633. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/411//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/411//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/411//console This message is automatically generated. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 02:34:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2BF2389B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 02:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78555 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 02:34:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78515 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 02:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78495 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 02:34:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 02:34:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 02:34:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393BFC3503 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 02:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 02:34:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1118126089.26899.1304649243231.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029699#comment-13029699 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7257: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #573 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/573/]) HADOOP-7257 Client side mount tables (sanjay) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:26:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6D43BB9 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19897 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:26:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19831 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19340 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:26:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:26:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:26:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EBFC301F for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:26:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1301803643.26993.1304652363348.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7245-1.patch Patch attached fixes the compilation errors in the S3 tests. > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:28:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 105C03BD4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20477 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20331 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20296 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:28:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BB2C310B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1225189113.26999.1304652483266.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029712#comment-13029712 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7245: ------------------------------------- Hey Tom, The change in your patch looks good. Latest patch just updates two tests. I'll commit this if Hudson comes back OK. Thanks, Eli > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:28:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35B343BDF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20673 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20401 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20297 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:28:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCF2C3117 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <225794797.27009.1304652483577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:28:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 376AB3BF4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20763 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20618 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20298 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:28:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:28:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6123DC3110 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:28:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <662764598.27003.1304652483394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:34:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78F0C30BC for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23441 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:34:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23420 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23412 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:34:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:34:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:34:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D35FC3228 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:34:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1008149673.27015.1304652843116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7244: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7244-1.patch The change to hod_cluster should go the other way eg from blocksize -> block.size. Attached patch fixes that. Otherwise looks great. > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:43:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D893153 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29581 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:43:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29421 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:43:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29402 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:43:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:43:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2712AC3436 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:43:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <542808712.27029.1304653383156.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029718#comment-13029718 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7245: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478362/hadoop-7245-1.patch against trunk revision 1100026. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/413//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/413//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/413//console This message is automatically generated. > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 03:55:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 468453610 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37163 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37127 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 03:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37100 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 03:55:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 03:55:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF6EC36AC for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 03:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:55:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <292297660.27039.1304654103311.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029721#comment-13029721 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7244: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478363/hadoop-7244-1.patch against trunk revision 1100026. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/414//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/414//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/414//console This message is automatically generated. > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:23:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FBB73084 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57050 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:23:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57019 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:23:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57003 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:23:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:23:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:23:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300B4C3CBB for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2096910461.27084.1304655783193.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029730#comment-13029730 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7245: ------------------------------------- +1 > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:23:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91795308D for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57263 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:23:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57022 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57002 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:23:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:23:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:23:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228D8C3CB9 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:23:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <803306445.27082.1304655783138.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029729#comment-13029729 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7244: ------------------------------------- +1 > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:31:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CE8638A1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61624 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61410 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61401 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:31:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:31:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:31:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399AEC3FB2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <577086366.27110.1304656263232.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7244: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk and merged to 22. Thanks Tom! > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:31:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1CC938B6 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61660 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:31:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61421 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61407 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:31:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:31:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:31:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3DEC3FBB for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:31:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1926558989.27114.1304656263370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk and merged to 22. Thanks Tom! > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:45:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 884863B86 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71473 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:45:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71444 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:45:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71428 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:45:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:45:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:45:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321A8C3330 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1400511441.27145.1304657103202.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029745#comment-13029745 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #574 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/574/]) HADOOP-7245. FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys. Contributed by Tom White > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 04:45:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 225EC3BB1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71770 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:45:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71446 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 04:45:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71427 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 04:45:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:45:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 04:45:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F551C332C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1606090802.27143.1304657103125.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029744#comment-13029744 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7244: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #574 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/574/]) HADOOP-7244. Documentation change for updated configuration keys. Contributed by Tom White > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 05:10:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6077C3165 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 05:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82914 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 05:10:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82710 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 05:10:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82627 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 05:10:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 05:10:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 05:10:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F8C3956 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 05:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 05:10:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1031760231.27176.1304658603179.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7183: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.3) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk, branch 22, and branch 21. Thanks Tom! > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch, HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 05:24:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A86A636AD for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 05:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91043 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 05:24:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90822 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 05:24:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90801 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 05:24:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 05:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 05:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CDEC3CBF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 05:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 05:24:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1941402147.27202.1304659444335.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029757#comment-13029757 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7183: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #575 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/575/]) HADOOP-7183. WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects. Contributed by Tom White > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch, HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 06:24:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B12C3F35 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 06:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37221 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 06:24:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37116 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 06:24:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36889 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 06:24:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 06:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 06:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913BC3DEF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 06:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 06:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1327657029.27279.1304663043230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7262) Update CS docs with better example configs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Update CS docs with better example configs ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Arun C Murthy Assignee: Arun C Murthy Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.20.204.0 It will be nice to enhance CS docs with real-world example configs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 07:22:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768D137F7 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99603 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:22:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99395 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:22:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99387 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 07:22:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:22:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:22:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27432C35DE for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:22:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1433332720.27441.1304666523157.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1327657029.27279.1304663043230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7262) Update CS docs with better example configs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun C Murthy updated HADOOP-7262: ---------------------------------- Attachment: capacity_scheduler.pdf HADOOP-7262.patch Patch with a real-world example config and also the generated capacity-scheduler.pdf for review. > Update CS docs with better example configs > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7262 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7262.patch, capacity_scheduler.pdf > > > It will be nice to enhance CS docs with real-world example configs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 07:30:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 557413C57 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8588 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:30:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8514 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8340 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 07:30:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:30:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:30:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B164C3A34 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:30:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <431084003.27479.1304667005500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun C Murthy updated HADOOP-6919: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: New metrics2 framework for Hadoop. Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks Luke! > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 07:47:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B1A83358 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34769 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:47:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34741 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 07:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34722 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 07:47:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:47:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:47:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8FC31F7 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:47:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <104920240.27532.1304668024466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029811#comment-13029811 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6919: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #576 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/576/]) HADOOP-6919. New metrics2 framework. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 09:44:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D23C37F5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97106 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97007 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96742 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 09:44:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C44AC3124 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <328220388.27751.1304675043439.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029867#comment-13029867 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7183: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #44 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/44/]) HADOOP-7183. svn merge -c 1100056 from trunk > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch, HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 09:44:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 442063803 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97433 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97393 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97385 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF5BC311C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <906537330.27745.1304675043246.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029865#comment-13029865 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7244: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #44 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/44/]) HADOOP-7244. svn merge -c 1100048 from trunk > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 09:44:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADB133810 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97662 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97634 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97618 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 09:44:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:44:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55901C3122 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:44:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2143256285.27749.1304675043347.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029866#comment-13029866 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #44 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/44/]) HADOOP-7245. svn merge -c 1100044 from trunk > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:16:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C79DB3188 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6559 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6536 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6514 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:16:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EDBC4E6A for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1225991363.27890.1304680563946.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1716213266.4485.1303865103489.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7244) Documentation change for updated configuration keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029888#comment-13029888 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7244: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #680 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/680/]) HADOOP-7244. Documentation change for updated configuration keys. Contributed by Tom White > Documentation change for updated configuration keys > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7244 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7244 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7244.patch, hadoop-7244-1.patch > > > Common counterpart of HDFS-671. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:16:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42173319C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6821 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6780 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6772 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04A7C4E81 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <324717148.27913.1304680564850.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029890#comment-13029890 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7257: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #680 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/680/]) HADOOP-7257 Client side mount tables (sanjay) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:16:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B61B31B2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7076 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7027 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7019 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:16:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29842C4E8B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <914326215.27923.1304680565166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1594670430.14027.1299867839776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7183) WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029891#comment-13029891 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7183: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #680 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/680/]) HADOOP-7183. WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects. Contributed by Tom White > WritableComparator.get should not cache comparator objects > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7183 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7183.patch, HADOOP-7183.patch > > > HADOOP-6881 modified WritableComparator.get such that the constructed WritableComparator gets saved back into the static map. This is fine for stateless comparators, but some comparators have per-instance state, and thus this becomes thread-unsafe and causes errors in the shuffle where multiple threads are doing comparisons. An example of a Comparator with per-instance state is WritableComparator itself. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:16:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EFE731E5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7591 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7539 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7481 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BA2C4E68 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1561029591.27888.1304680563864.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6919) Metrics2: metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029887#comment-13029887 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6919: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #680 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/680/]) HADOOP-6919. New metrics2 framework. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics2: metrics framework > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6919 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6919 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6919-metrics2-framework-v6.patch, hadoop-6919-trunk-v1.patch > > > The jira tracks the new metrics framework only changes, i.e., it doesn't track the instrumentation changes (and compatibility issues) to existing code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 11:16:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32A4F31F6 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7623 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7541 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7492 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 11:16:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:16:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053D6C4E6C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <368606163.27892.1304680564018.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <890288429.6872.1303934523413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7245) FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029889#comment-13029889 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7245: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #680 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/680/]) HADOOP-7245. FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys. Contributed by Tom White > FsConfig should use constants in CommonConfigurationKeys > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7245 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7245 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7245.patch, hadoop-7245-1.patch > > > In particular, FsConfig should use fs.defaultFS instead of the deprecated fs.default.name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:17:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D257D376A for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18610 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:17:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18571 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:17:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18563 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:17:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:17:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:17:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B72C4DFE for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:17:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1661218055.28421.1304698623859.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch patch for branch-0.20-security > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:19:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ADB23036 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23902 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:19:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23867 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:19:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23856 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:19:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:19:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:19:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDE4C4EF3 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1815229687.28429.1304698743241.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029999#comment-13029999 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7248: --------------------------------------- [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 19 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 Eclipse classpath. The patch causes the Eclipse classpath to differ from the contents of the lib directories. [exec] The javadoc and eclipse classpath were failing before this patch. Once this is commited the eclipse classpath check should start showing +1 again. I manually tested this: - check out svn tree - apply patch - svn rm the empty files - build eclipse target either from within eclipse or with ant eclipse - refresh eclipse - build eclipse project - everything resolves and you can run unit tests > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:21:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11CD6307B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24760 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24575 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:21:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24535 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:21:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:21:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:21:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DF9C4FFD for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:21:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:21:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1371496820.28441.1304698864029.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Graves updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) 0.20.205.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:23:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53D783151 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27048 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:23:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27020 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:23:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27012 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:23:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:23:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:23:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97315C409C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:23:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1489376492.28451.1304698983260.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030003#comment-13030003 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7248: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478446/HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch against trunk revision 1100113. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 19 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/415//console This message is automatically generated. > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:28:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC3D232E2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33772 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:28:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33739 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33731 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:28:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:28:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:28:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C5DC421C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:28:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430114315.28461.1304699283274.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030004#comment-13030004 ] Thomas Graves commented on HADOOP-7248: --------------------------------------- build failed because patch is for branch-0.20-security not trunk. > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:32:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 692963149 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40521 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:32:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40466 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40378 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:32:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:32:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:32:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76318C4415 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:32:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Greg Wittel (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1962550673.28477.1304699523480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7263) Hadoop Streaming (StreamJob) does not delete temporary job/package jar MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hadoop Streaming (StreamJob) does not delete temporary job/package jar ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7263 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7263 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2, 0.20.3, 0.20.4 Reporter: Greg Wittel Priority: Minor The streaming job driver (org.apache.hadoop.streaming.StreamJob) does not delete the temporary JAR file it generates after a job completes. Without the fix, /var/tmp fills up with streaming job jars until they get wiped. The jar name is stored in the class variable 'jar_'. The JAR is generated in 'packageJobJar()' and the name stored in jar_. Fix: run()/submitAndMonitorJob() should clean up the jar_ file when done. Or the JAR could be generatd as a tempfile and cleaned up automatically. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 16:46:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA5D43722 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55705 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:46:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55669 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 16:46:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55661 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 16:46:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:46:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:46:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433B3C4912 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 16:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:46:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <511078625.28508.1304700363272.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I committed the patch. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 18:24:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 819E93E52 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93825 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93798 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93788 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 18:24:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:24:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB681C4905 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1330832899.28720.1304706243764.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7264) Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7264 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.23.0 Needed by mapreduce 2.0 avro support. Maybe we could jump to Avro 1.5. There is incompatible API changes from 1.3x to 1.4x (Utf8 to CharSequence in user facing APIs) not sure about 1.5x though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 18:38:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 424833512 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16434 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16400 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16392 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 18:38:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:38:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:38:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C98C4DE1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 18:38:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <971643595.28765.1304707083421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1330832899.28720.1304706243764.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7264) Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030077#comment-13030077 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7264: ------------------------------------- Is it worth considering maven shade or jarjar for avro? Or in MR2 do we no longer have the issue that the daemon formerly known as the TaskTracker leaks its jar dependencies onto the user classpath? > Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7264 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Labels: avro > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Needed by mapreduce 2.0 avro support. Maybe we could jump to Avro 1.5. There is incompatible API changes from 1.3x to 1.4x (Utf8 to CharSequence in user facing APIs) not sure about 1.5x though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 18:56:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA543C02 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36687 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36660 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 18:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36651 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 18:56:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:56:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:56:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459B6C42D2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 18:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 18:56:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1251501633.28800.1304708163281.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1330832899.28720.1304706243764.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7264) Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030082#comment-13030082 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7264: --------------------------------- maven shade and jarjar doesn't help in this case for mr2 (it's in the common code in job history), as both client and server needs to be on at least 1.4.1, sans an OSGi containment in the job history server, which would be over-engineering at this point. maven shade/jarjar would be helpful for future client libraries. BTW, we initially actually used maven shade for various servers, but had to remove it as the added processing time, the annoying warnings and the resulting bulk really don't worth the trouble. > Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7264 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Labels: avro > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Needed by mapreduce 2.0 avro support. Maybe we could jump to Avro 1.5. There is incompatible API changes from 1.3x to 1.4x (Utf8 to CharSequence in user facing APIs) not sure about 1.5x though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:18:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11941348A for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65746 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65699 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65684 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:18:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:18:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544EBC4E2F for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1944031344.28880.1304709483342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1330832899.28720.1304706243764.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7264) Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030097#comment-13030097 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7264: ------------------------------------- k, thanks for the perspective. I bring this up because we've heard from a number of users that, when we change the version of dependencies like thrift, avro, or (especially) Jackson, it hurts users who use these same libraries in their jobs. > Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7264 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Labels: avro > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Needed by mapreduce 2.0 avro support. Maybe we could jump to Avro 1.5. There is incompatible API changes from 1.3x to 1.4x (Utf8 to CharSequence in user facing APIs) not sure about 1.5x though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:18:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 750BA34B5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66118 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66057 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65954 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:18:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:18:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:18:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29818C4E25 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Keep track of relative paths ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7265 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:37:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB96832FB for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95112 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:37:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95076 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95068 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:37:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:37:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:37:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3E1C44E1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:37:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2076641004.28921.1304710623255.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1330832899.28720.1304706243764.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7264) Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030105#comment-13030105 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7264: --------------------------------- We do want to improve the isolation of dependencies between framework and user code, which I believe is related but really orthogonal to this jira. HADOOP-7150 is trying to achieve that. I believe it's mostly achievable via careful refactor of classpath construction and a little shade/jar/jar in the near term and completely nailed with some like OSGi in the long term. > Bump avro version to at least 1.4.1 > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7264 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7264 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Labels: avro > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Needed by mapreduce 2.0 avro support. Maybe we could jump to Avro 1.5. There is incompatible API changes from 1.3x to 1.4x (Utf8 to CharSequence in user facing APIs) not sure about 1.5x though. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:41:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B09A73397 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2791 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2768 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2760 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:41:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:41:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:41:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B5DC45B6 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1605225256.28924.1304710863200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7265: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7265.patch > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:41:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7C1633A7 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3057 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:41:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3013 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:41:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3005 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:41:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:41:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:41:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451BDC45BA for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1386818731.28926.1304710863279.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7265: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 19:55:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1DE93968 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15338 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:55:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15310 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:55:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15302 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:55:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:55:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304C6C49AA for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1360914186.28966.1304711703193.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030112#comment-13030112 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7265: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478463/HADOOP-7265.patch against trunk revision 1100278. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/416//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/416//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/416//console This message is automatically generated. > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:21:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E0735DE for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47230 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:21:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47153 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47020 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:21:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:21:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:21:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BA6C4085 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:21:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101411461.28994.1304713263421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7249: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Thanks also Matt for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:35:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D22C73CA4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66940 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66901 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66893 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDB9C45B6 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1812776221.29036.1304714103241.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030123#comment-13030123 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7249: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #578 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/578/]) HADOOP-7249. Refactor the chmod/chown/chgrp command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:35:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 206283CAE for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67154 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67128 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67119 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:35:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:35:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B7C45BB for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1151480213.29039.1304714103374.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030124#comment-13030124 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7261: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #578 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/578/]) > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:39:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26CED3D96 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70965 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:39:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70934 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70914 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:39:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:39:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:39:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E8FC47DF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:39:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1150893561.29067.1304714343287.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7266) Deprecate metrics v1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Deprecate metrics v1 -------------------- Key: HADOOP-7266 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:41:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A5B83E38 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75159 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:41:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75117 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:41:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75025 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:41:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:41:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:41:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4DDC48D6 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1660405400.29103.1304714464514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1150893561.29067.1304714343287.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7266) Deprecate metrics v1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030130#comment-13030130 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7266: --------------------------------- After all framework metrics have been ported to metrics v2. > Deprecate metrics v1 > -------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7266 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:44:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3F1E3FCC for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89582 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:44:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89446 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89434 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:44:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:44:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:44:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5504FC43A1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1687350606.29118.1304714643344.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1150893561.29067.1304714343287.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7266) Deprecate metrics v1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030131#comment-13030131 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7266: --------------------------------- By framework, I meant non-user/downstream metrics related code in common, hdfs and mapreduce, as per discussion in HADOOP-6728. > Deprecate metrics v1 > -------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7266 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:44:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E93993FD3 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89725 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89692 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89684 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:44:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:44:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:44:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E251C43A2 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:44:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1780076407.29119.1304714643382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1150893561.29067.1304714343287.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7266) Deprecate metrics v1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7266: ---------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > Deprecate metrics v1 > -------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7266 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7266 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:46:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A1563BAC for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93483 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:46:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93452 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:46:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93424 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:46:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:46:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:46:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F52C40CE for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <32744862.29160.1304714764811.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6728: ---------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:50:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781C83524 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99460 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99374 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99289 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:50:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:50:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FA1C4282 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge --------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7267 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 20:58:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEAAA363B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8571 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:58:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8540 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 20:58:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8532 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 20:58:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:58:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 20:58:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D283C450C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 20:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:58:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <690394661.29192.1304715483115.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7251: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Thanks also Matt for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:00:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E039C3A40 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10988 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10909 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10894 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:00:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F961C4652 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2074951810.29204.1304715603518.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6920: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:00:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E15DA3A41 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11008 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10912 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10897 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:00:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:00:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:00:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89456C4654 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:00:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <728127037.29205.1304715603559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030136#comment-13030136 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7238: ------------------------------------------------ Daryn, the patch does not apply anymore. > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:02:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 313BD33B5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12675 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:02:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12641 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12633 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:02:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:02:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:02:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7981CC47A0 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <961850156.29216.1304715723494.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6920: ---------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) This patch also moves the canonical package of EventCounter to org.apache.log.metrics > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:04:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADE883BB1 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14011 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:04:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13954 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:04:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13945 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:04:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:04:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:04:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D857C488C for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:04:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <673391250.29224.1304715843182.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030139#comment-13030139 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7265: -------------------------------------- +1 on the patch. > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:06:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15B5E3BF0 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14950 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:06:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14917 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:06:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14898 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:06:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:06:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:06:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A97FC4916 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:06:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1393530997.29227.1304715963433.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6918: ---------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Release Note: Harmonizing metrics names to CapitalizedCamelCase (was: Harmonizing metrics names) > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:15:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DC6B3D9F for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24153 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:15:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24128 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:15:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24120 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:15:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:15:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:15:16 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806AEC4B4D for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:14:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1710094510.29246.1304716478522.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030144#comment-13030144 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7251: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #579 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/579/]) HADOOP-7251. Refactor the getmerge command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:15:18 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D7BD3DAF for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24393 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:15:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24354 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24132 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:15:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:15:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:15:16 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E79FC4B4B for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:14:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <952219051.29244.1304716478448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030143#comment-13030143 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6920: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478470/hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch against trunk revision 1100369. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/417//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/417//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/417//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/417//console This message is automatically generated. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 21:40:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8E313967 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49459 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49426 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 21:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49418 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 21:40:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:40:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 21:40:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C3DC4244 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <871190861.29280.1304718003147.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030152#comment-13030152 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6920: --------------------------------- The RAT warning is from an empty src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Display.java from Nicholas' commit for HADOOP-7251. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 6 22:26:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8F835F5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 22:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89212 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 22:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89157 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 22:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89149 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 22:26:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 22:26:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 22:26:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2697DC4EE5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 22:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:26:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1119206474.29342.1304720763154.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030171#comment-13030171 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7249: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #580 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/580/]) Remove the empty file accidentally checked it with HADOOP-7249. > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 00:11:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 097A23BFE for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59164 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:11:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59124 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 00:11:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59116 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 00:11:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:11:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:11:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44117C4B24 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1736384367.29564.1304727063275.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6918) Make metrics naming consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6918: ---------------------------- Release Note: Harmonizing metrics names to CapitalizedCamelCase. Examples: bytes_written becomes BytesWritten; threadsBlocked becomes ThreadsBlocked etc. was:Harmonizing metrics names to CapitalizedCamelCase > Make metrics naming consistent > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6918 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > While working HADOOP-6728, I noticed that our metrics naming style is all over the place: > * Capitalized camel case: e.g., "FilesCreated" in namenode metrics and some rpc metrics > * uncapitalized camel case: e.g, "threadsBlocked" in jvm metrics and some rpc metrics > * lowercased underscored: e.g., "bytes_written" in datanode metrics and mapreduce metrics > Let's make them consistent. How about uncapitalized camel case? My main reason for the camel case: some backends have limits on the name length and underscore is wasteful. > Once we have a consistent naming style we can do: > @Metric("Number of INodes created") MutableCounterLong filesCreated; > instead of the more redundant: > @Metric({"FilesCreated", "Number of INodes created"}) MutableCounterLong filesCreated; -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 11:15:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15EB4257C for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84886 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84828 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84812 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 11:15:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62022C5A06 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <243299511.30038.1304766903398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <720022722.11722.1304088663379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7251) Refactor FsShell's getmerge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030317#comment-13030317 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7251: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #681 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/681/]) HADOOP-7251. Refactor the getmerge command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's getmerge > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7251 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7251-2.patch, HADOOP-7251.patch > > > Need to refactor getmerge to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 11:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E89A02595 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85348 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85313 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85305 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 11:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381B9C5A01 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1033191605.30033.1304766903226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <796788985.10688.1304041503305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7249) Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030315#comment-13030315 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7249: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #681 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/681/]) Remove the empty file accidentally checked it with HADOOP-7249. HADOOP-7249. Refactor the chmod/chown/chgrp command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's chmod/chown/chgrp > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7249 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7249 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7249-2.patch, HADOOP-7249.patch > > > Need to refactor permissions commands to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 7 11:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19ACC2584 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84858 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84825 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2011 11:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84809 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2011 11:15:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 May 2011 11:15:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5652DC5A05 for ; Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2008864235.30037.1304766903350.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030316#comment-13030316 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7261: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #681 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/681/]) HADOOP-7261. Disable IPV6 for junit tests. Contributed by Suresh Srinivas. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 00:35:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0FB9348A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 00:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3222 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 00:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3183 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 00:35:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3174 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 00:35:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 00:35:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 00:35:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219D0C707B for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 00:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 00:35:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1787564551.31447.1304901303134.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <304321177.482.1298765698936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7157) Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7157: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7157.patch Using resource array instead of decl. list. > Create build hosts configurations to prevent degradation of patch validation and snapshot build environment > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7157 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7157 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Environment: Apache Hadoop build hosts > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Attachments: HADOOP-7157.patch, HADOOP-7157.patch > > > Build hosts are being re-jumped, in need for configuration updates, etc. It is hard to maintain the same configuration across a 10+ hosts. A specialized service such as Puppet can be used to maintain build machines software and configurations at a desired level. > Such configs should be checked into SCM system along with the of sources code. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 05:04:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 834E84BF3 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 05:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51380 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 05:04:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51140 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 05:04:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51001 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 05:04:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 05:04:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 05:04:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492D6C7388 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 05:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 05:04:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7268 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs, security Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Devaraj Das Fix For: 0.23.0 FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 13:33:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29E7E4887 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64398 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 13:33:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64231 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 13:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63954 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 13:33:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:33:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:33:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A45C8848 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <563672243.32348.1304947983269.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030726#comment-13030726 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7261: ---------------------------------------- IPv6 is turned off in the official Hadoop scripts already: HADOOP-6056 > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 16:42:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11A004FCE for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91870 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 16:42:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91755 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 16:42:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91708 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 16:42:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 16:42:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 16:42:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61747C8EAD for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 16:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 16:42:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7269 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs/s3 Reporter: Nicholas Telford Priority: Minor The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream * Content-Length: * Content-MD5: This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 17:26:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C0664CE6 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63286 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 17:26:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63258 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 17:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63250 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 17:26:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:26:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:26:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A65C8F68 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1834333561.32850.1304961963339.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1362418509.26364.1304633343208.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7261) Disable IPV6 for junit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030822#comment-13030822 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7261: ------------------------------------ Yes, please see further https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1891?focusedCommentId=13029086&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13029086" These fixes are for the junit and contrib junit tests, which are not adequately covered by the modification to hadoop-config.sh done in HADOOP-6056. > Disable IPV6 for junit tests > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7261 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7261.1.patch, HADOOP-7261.patch > > > IPV6 addresses not handles currently in the common library methods. IPV6 can return address as "0:0:0:0:0:0:port". Some utility methods such as NetUtils#createSocketAddress(), NetUtils#normalizeHostName(), NetUtils#getHostNameOfIp() to name a few, do not handle IPV6 address and expect address to be of format host:port. > Until IPV6 is formally supported, I propose disabling IPV6 for junit tests to avoid problems seen in HDFS-1891. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 17:56:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C1794045 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14781 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 17:56:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14750 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 17:56:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14742 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 17:56:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:56:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:56:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC20C8879 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:56:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <378830390.32903.1304963764765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch Fix merge conflicts with most recent svn code. Polish usage display message for hadoop-setup-hdfs.sh. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 18:14:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C238E4973 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37437 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37406 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37396 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 18:14:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:14:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAD2C8E8B for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:14:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <527207597.32976.1304964844519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030837#comment-13030837 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478624/HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch against trunk revision 1100400. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 27 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 3 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/418//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/418//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/418//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/418//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 18:24:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FA7B4100 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51290 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:24:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51260 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:24:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51252 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 18:24:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:24:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5A4C8207 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2104594010.32996.1304965443247.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7265: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks Daryn! Also thanks Tanping for reviewing it. > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 18:36:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F9B04984 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74375 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:36:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74345 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 18:36:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74337 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 18:36:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:36:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:36:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3264CC86BA for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:36:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1426015920.33018.1304966163203.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030847#comment-13030847 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7265: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #581 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/581/]) HADOOP-7265. Keep track of relative paths in PathData. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 19:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEF504405 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 19:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30560 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 19:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30522 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 19:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30514 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 19:15:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:15:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B86AC8477 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 19:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <798237261.33129.1304968503174.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7238: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7238-2.patch update patch to resolve conflicts in if/then/else chains caused by removal of other commands > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7238-2.patch, HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 19:33:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7BE14C91 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 19:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52215 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52186 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52174 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 19:33:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:33:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:33:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3F9C899B for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 19:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <956153629.33143.1304969583173.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030868#comment-13030868 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7238: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478631/HADOOP-7238-2.patch against trunk revision 1101132. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/419//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/419//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/419//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7238-2.patch, HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 20:14:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8EA4525 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4243 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4213 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4204 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 20:14:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:14:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB87C5704 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2134590962.33220.1304972043183.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7238: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks Matt for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7238-2.patch, HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 20:24:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 480894D0E for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25006 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:24:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24933 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24803 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 20:24:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:24:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:24:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA4C5AAC for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:24:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1026835623.33234.1304972643311.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030886#comment-13030886 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7238: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #582 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/582/]) HADOOP-7238. Refactor the cat and text commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7238-2.patch, HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 20:50:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 196614E1E for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70960 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70936 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70928 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 20:50:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:50:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:50:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F45C830A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1203422127.33287.1304974203213.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey reassigned HADOOP-7268: -------------------------------------------- Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 20:54:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39EEF4EA3 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75290 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:54:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75241 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75233 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 20:54:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:54:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BE2C8486 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1219791200.33292.1304974443200.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7268: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7268.1.patch This patch removes the singleton for localfs file context. A new file context object will be created when getLocalFSFileContext() is called. > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 20:54:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C9064EB2 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75508 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75469 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 20:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75355 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 20:54:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:54:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:54:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5030FC848C for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1715973682.33296.1304974443325.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7268: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 21:14:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A1014984 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7631 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7595 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7587 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 21:14:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:14:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:14:43 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B4FC8A39 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:14:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <746722399.33311.1304975645093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030899#comment-13030899 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7268: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478634/HADOOP-7268.1.patch against trunk revision 1101199. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/420//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/420//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/420//console This message is automatically generated. > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 21:22:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09DAE406C for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20802 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20755 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20747 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 21:22:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:22:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:22:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C38DC8C52 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2112834732.33319.1304976123177.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1327657029.27279.1304663043230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7262) Update CS docs with better example configs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030901#comment-13030901 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-7262: -------------------------------------- Arun, "mapred.capacity-scheduler.queue." is repeated many times on the tables in your pdf doc. We should fill in the right conf names. > Update CS docs with better example configs > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7262 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7262.patch, capacity_scheduler.pdf > > > It will be nice to enhance CS docs with real-world example configs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 9 21:40:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FF144A7C for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52359 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:40:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52309 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 21:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52269 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 21:40:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:40:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:40:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9BDC82A5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1731762492.33355.1304977203248.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1327657029.27279.1304663043230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7262) Update CS docs with better example configs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030912#comment-13030912 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-7262: -------------------------------------- bq. Capacity Guarantees bq. Isn't 'guarantee' a strong word to use for the current capacity scheduler? This is only possible when all of the queues have max-limit equal to queue capacity (since we don't have preemption). bq. If true, priorities of jobs will be taken into account in scheduling decisions. bq. On our internal cluster, we've never tried this. It was once pointed out that we still have priority inversion problems(MAPREDUCE:314) and should not enable this conf. Was this fixed ? If not, should we mention that it is not being used/tested yet? > Update CS docs with better example configs > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7262 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7262 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Arun C Murthy > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7262.patch, capacity_scheduler.pdf > > > It will be nice to enhance CS docs with real-world example configs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 00:46:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D83A14EDA for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89963 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 00:46:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89931 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 00:46:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89922 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 00:46:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:41 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE82C9DEE for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 00:46:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1366846970.33629.1304988363184.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7270) Server$Listener.getAddress(..) throws NullPointerException MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Server$Listener.getAddress(..) throws NullPointerException ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7270 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE In [build #469|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/469//testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode/TestFiDataTransferProtocol2/pipeline_Fi_29/], {noformat} 2011-05-09 23:21:35,528 ERROR datanode.DataNode (DataXceiver.java:run(133)) - 127.0.0.1:57149:DataXceiver java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.getAddress(Server.java:518) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server.getListenerAddress(Server.java:1662) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.getIpcPort(DataNode.java:1461) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.getDatanodeId(DataNode.java:2747) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiverAspects.ajc$after$org_apache_hadoop_hdfs_server_datanode_BlockReceiverAspects$9$725950a6(BlockReceiverAspects.aj:226) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.BlockReceiver.close(BlockReceiver.java:230) at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.cleanup(IOUtils.java:157) at org.apache.hadoop.io.IOUtils.closeStream(IOUtils.java:173) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.opWriteBlock(DataXceiver.java:408) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.DataTransferProtocol$Receiver.opWriteBlock(DataTransferProtocol.java:414) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.DataTransferProtocol$Receiver.processOp(DataTransferProtocol.java:360) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:131) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 11:15:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33E125C9D for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47769 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 11:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47554 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47538 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 11:15:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538C0C98E9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1550515234.34402.1305026103339.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1142652053.28874.1304709483167.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7265) Keep track of relative paths MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031123#comment-13031123 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7265: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #684 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/684/]) HADOOP-7265. Keep track of relative paths in PathData. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Keep track of relative paths > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7265 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7265.patch > > > As part of the effort to standardize the display of paths, the PathData tracks the exact string used to create a path. When obtaining a directory's contents, the relative nature of the original path should be preserved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 11:15:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343675C9F for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47835 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 11:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47562 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47542 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 11:15:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7C8C98E6 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1131780699.34399.1305026103240.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <651142754.74841.1303423565756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7238) Refactor FsShell's cat & text MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031122#comment-13031122 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7238: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #684 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/684/]) HADOOP-7238. Refactor the cat and text commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's cat & text > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7238 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7238 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7238-2.patch, HADOOP-7238.patch > > > Need to refactor cat & text to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 16:57:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B4D564C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32506 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 16:57:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32462 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 16:57:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32454 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 16:57:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:57:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:57:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B858736F12 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1782899901.550.1305046612751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch Update patch to reflect the current state of trunk > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 17:03:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E774B5789 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41690 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41664 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41656 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 17:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3062441C3 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:02:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1412040970.594.1305046968992.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031255#comment-13031255 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478710/HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch against trunk revision 1101199. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/421//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 17:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED6A850B1 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58497 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:15:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58449 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:15:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58441 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 17:15:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:15:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAB944578 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <229413150.627.1305047688052.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7257) A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7257: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Release Note: viewfs - client-side mount table. Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > A client side mount table to give per-application/per-job file system view > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7257 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: ViewFs - javdoc2.pdf, ViewFsJavaDoc.pdf, viewFs2.patch, viewFs3.patch, viewFs4.patch, viewFs5.patch, viewfs1.patch > > > This jira proposes a client side mount table to allow application-centric (or job-centric) filesystem views. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 17:46:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06B955131 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10777 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10748 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 17:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10740 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 17:46:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B962736005 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1331797428.759.1305049547756.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031270#comment-13031270 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7268: -------------------------------------- +1 > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14606-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:04:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC46B5882 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53655 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:04:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53621 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53610 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:04:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:04:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B5A367E9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <854067926.796.1305050627400.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7268: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14607-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:06:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3689E58E8 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54866 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54827 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54787 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:06:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:06:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD32368C0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Standardize error messages -------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7271 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: cmd: $path: No such file or directory cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory cmd: Can not find listing for $path cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. cmd: No such file or directory `$path' cmd: File does not exist: $path cmd: File $path does not exist ... etc ... These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14608-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:14:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2762A5B67 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71138 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:14:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71108 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71100 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:14:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686E836B85 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <479801521.811.1305051227424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7271: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14609-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 590715B74 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71396 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71356 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71348 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADAD36B83 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <855353749.809.1305051227368.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7271: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7271.patch Create path exceptions that encapsulate and enforce a standard posix/unix error message. Change cmds, both redesigned and pending redesign, to use the new exceptions. The changes made to the pending cmds are to facilitate a redesign of multiple commands w/o constantly breaking hdfs tests each time a command is updated. Took out some of the TODO items related to standardizing. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14610-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:24:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6519352E5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95514 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95423 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95415 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C96844031 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1830376490.835.1305051827507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031288#comment-13031288 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7268: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #583 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/583/]) HADOOP-7268. FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens. Contributed by jitendra. > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14611-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:34:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A222659B2 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14643 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14617 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14608 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F0544376 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755433965.849.1305052427615.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031290#comment-13031290 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7271: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478716/HADOOP-7271.patch against trunk revision 1101570. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell.TestPathExceptions +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/422//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/422//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/422//console This message is automatically generated. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14612-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 18:48:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B880450B0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39524 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:48:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39479 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 18:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39471 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 18:48:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E263A448D7 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101532583.901.1305053267924.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7271: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7271-2.patch Add the apostrophes needed to make the tests pass. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14613-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 19:04:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B83FE59F3 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72767 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:04:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72738 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72730 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 19:04:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:04:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7919744FA2 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <656397007.942.1305054227492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031314#comment-13031314 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7271: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478720/HADOOP-7271-2.patch against trunk revision 1101570. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/423//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/423//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/423//console This message is automatically generated. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14614-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 19:18:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E605058FE for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89627 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89586 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89578 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 19:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3EB44419 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:17:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <507860065.977.1305055069055.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6920: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14615-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 19:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A79F65932 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90131 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90102 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 19:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90094 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 19:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09444440C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2128893102.966.1305055068720.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6920: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14616-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 20:17:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45D455DBE for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90355 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90323 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90285 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:17:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6401344866 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1221827855.1111.1305058607406.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21922935.186601292622961312.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7068) Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031347#comment-13031347 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7068: ----------------------------------- +1. I agree that this is very confusing and makes it almost impossible to do parallel builds on Jenkins boxes. I'm going to go ahead and commit this, HDFS-1544, and MAPREDUCE-2222, unless there are objections. > Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Attachments: hadoop-7068-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-7068-trunk-v2.patch > > > The problem is introduced by HADOOP-6486. Which have caused a lot of mysterious artifact issues (unable to downgrade or do parallel dev, without wiping out both m2 and ivy caches etc.) wasting countless hours of dev (many people's) time to track down the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14617-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 20:41:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 943D651A8 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42287 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 20:41:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42266 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 20:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42258 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 20:41:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:41:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:41:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5350441C9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1260170137.1167.1305060047739.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031367#comment-13031367 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6920: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the change. This patch is also forward port from 203, the metrics related infrastructure change. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14618-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 21:22:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413D753F5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91359 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91330 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91321 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515D144E42 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <210442175.1231.1305062507329.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031383#comment-13031383 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7271: ------------------------------------- +1. looks good to me. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14619-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 21:34:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 702AC59D9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7944 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7915 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7907 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9790A4432E for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2142799800.1261.1305063227617.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7271: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks John for reviewing it. > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14620-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 21:46:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2010D5488 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25265 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25222 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25214 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 21:46:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:46:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6300844808 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <463771946.1317.1305063947402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031400#comment-13031400 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7271: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #584 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/584/]) HADOOP-7271. Standardize shell command error messages. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14621-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 21:58:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12643522C for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34686 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34659 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 21:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34649 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 21:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DDB44C6A for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 21:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:57:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <465254807.1357.1305064668151.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Attachment: C7248-1.patch This section: {noformat} + {noformat} Didn't work on git, because the src/test/mapred dirs are empty in subversion. I deleted this tree from SVN and updated the patch. +1 Otherwise. Applied this to a fresh checkout, ran the new target, and all was good. > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: C7248-1.patch, HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14622-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:04:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92A2356F8 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37646 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:04:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37598 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37590 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:04:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:04:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7100A44DAB for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <728066274.1366.1305065027459.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031408#comment-13031408 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7248: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478740/C7248-1.patch against trunk revision 1101653. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 19 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/424//console This message is automatically generated. > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: C7248-1.patch, HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14623-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:10:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 475B8580E for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42852 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:10:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42822 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:10:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42810 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:10:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A55144F8A for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove unnecessary security related info logs --------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7272 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc, security Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.23.0 Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14624-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:10:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2C3A5840 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44606 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:10:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44572 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:10:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44564 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:10:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FDA44F8F for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1854805184.1380.1305065387594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031411#comment-13031411 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7272: ----------------------------------------- The logs are: {noformat} LOG.info("SASL server context established. Negotiated QoP is " + saslServer.getNegotiatedProperty(Sasl.QOP)); LOG.info("SASL server successfully authenticated client: " + user); {noformat} Of this the second log is also recorded in audit logs. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14625-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:12:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16E995869 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46519 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46488 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:12:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46480 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:12:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621BB44059 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1388824635.1383.1305065507398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7272.patch > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14626-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0301587E for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47047 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46987 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46821 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDB944061 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1329338356.1390.1305065507635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031413#comment-13031413 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14627-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:20:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA54F5D4D for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48999 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48962 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48953 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420A441F3 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <802179983.1407.1305065987668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6920: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6920.v6.patch Updates to the patch: A minor bug fix in DefaultMetricsSystem.java and additional information in the hadoop-metrics2.properties to show how to configure the new metrics2 properties. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14628-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 203325DA5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50211 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50172 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50164 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5494429D for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <875844270.1414.1305066108055.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031416#comment-13031416 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7272: ----------------------------------------- Since this is a trivial log change, I compiled the change to make sure the code compiles. Not planning to run hudson job or add tests. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14629-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:26:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63BF45F72 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55131 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55083 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54985 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:26:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BF44429 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <685824115.1437.1305066347984.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-7272. ------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I committed the change. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14630-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:28:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC0E5F9D for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56843 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56811 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56803 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:28:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2043444B6 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <320706192.1448.1305066467725.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031421#comment-13031421 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6920: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478742/hadoop-6920.v6.patch against trunk revision 1101668. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/426//console This message is automatically generated. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14631-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:32:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A74655BC7 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62658 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62608 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62600 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CEA44716 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <312123642.1492.1305066708818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031434#comment-13031434 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6920: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478742/hadoop-6920.v6.patch against trunk revision 1101653. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/425//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/425//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/425//console This message is automatically generated. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14632-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 22:44:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DFDC58A9 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80548 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:44:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80518 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 22:44:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80510 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 22:44:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:44:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:44:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A17E44C03 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:43:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <140517592.1567.1305067429038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031441#comment-13031441 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7272: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #585 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/585/]) HADOOP-7272. Remove unnecessary security related info logs. Contributed by Suresh Srinivas. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14633-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 10 23:32:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76E295AB8 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26245 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 23:32:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26213 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 23:32:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26205 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 23:32:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:32:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B51E44A69 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <215806862.1714.1305070307501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6571) /stacks servlet no longer has correct content-type MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon resolved HADOOP-6571. --------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Fixed by HADOOP-6496 (verified on trunk just now) > /stacks servlet no longer has correct content-type > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6571 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6571 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > > This makes /stacks format completely incorrectly. It should have text/plain content type, but instead has text/html. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14634-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 00:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C3A75884 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60632 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:16:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60589 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60581 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 00:16:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA284473F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <882303051.1797.1305072947380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031485#comment-13031485 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6920: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #586 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/586/]) HADOOP-6920. Metrics instrumentation to move new metrics2 framework. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14635-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 00:18:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D59251AA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60957 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:18:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60923 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:18:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60915 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 00:18:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:18:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:18:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E85A447F8 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1147685544.1808.1305073067383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6920: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Metrics names are standardized to use CapitalizedCamelCase. Some examples of this is: # Metrics names using "_" is changed to new naming scheme. Eg: bytes_written changes to BytesWritten. # All metrics names start with capitals. Example: threadsBlocked changes to ThreadsBlocked. Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14636-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 00:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1CBA574F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87667 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87629 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87620 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C39E441B1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:54:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <329847962.1866.1305075288046.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031493#comment-13031493 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7214: ------------------------------------- Looking good. I think we need to update src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/service_level_auth.xml and also conf/hadoop-policy.xml.template. But let's open another JIRA, since that file is out-of-date for other ACLs as well. +1 for this patch. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14637-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 01:05:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD4875DA4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99486 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:05:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99458 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99450 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 01:05:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:05:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:05:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94174443C9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1974979068.1902.1305075887603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7214: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks, Aaron! > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14638-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 01:25:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B90D5562 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17466 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:25:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17435 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17427 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 01:25:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:25:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:25:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8ED448E1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <669412213.1943.1305077087383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031503#comment-13031503 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7214: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #587 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/587/]) HADOOP-7214. Add Common functionality necessary to provide an equivalent of /usr/bin/groups for Hadoop. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14639-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 01:55:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C00D51FD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34169 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34136 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 01:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34128 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 01:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54324441C7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1682376274.1991.1305078887341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7273) Move JMXGet from hdfs to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Move JMXGet from hdfs to common ------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7273 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7273 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.23.0 JMXGet is generally useful especially for testing JMX attributes. Let's move it from o.a.h.hdfs.tools to o.a.h.tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14640-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 02:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0DAD4DD2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63592 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63414 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 02:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63406 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 02:44:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6655D44F4C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 02:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 02:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <644851451.2025.1305081827415.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <285327525.9499.1304014323342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7248) Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7248: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I took a closer look at the patch, and came across this section: {noformat} + + + + + + + + + + + + + + {noformat} Installing this jar into the maven cache would not only avoid downloading it so often, but it would also make the eclipse target valid when building offline. However, it looks like HADOOP-6407 (and related issues) made the same choice, so this can be a separate issue. I committed this to the 20-security branch. > Have a way to automatically update Eclipse .classpath file when new libs are added to the classpath through Ivy for 0.20-* based sources > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7248 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7248 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.3 > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: C7248-1.patch, HADOOP-7248-branch-20-security.patch > > > Backport HADOOP-6407 into 0.20 based source trees -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14641-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:47:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DF7E4F6B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2238 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:47:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2031 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2020 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:47:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:47:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5968F44CCC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <970256549.2061.1305085607363.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-6171: --------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6171.patch > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14642-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:53:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72DDD447F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3294 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:53:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3175 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3161 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:53:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2BE44E28 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1765811320.2063.1305085967377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-6171: --------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-6171.patch Here is patch for hdfs subproject. > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14643-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65F3744AF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3749 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3720 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3709 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A99A44F19 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <412279545.2070.1305086087564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-6171: --------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-6171.patch > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14644-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:55:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F59B44BE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4005 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3965 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3902 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:55:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FCC44F18 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1814914619.2069.1305086087537.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-6171: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: HDFS-6171.patch) > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14645-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 03:57:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0E3544D9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4945 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:57:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4916 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 03:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4904 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 03:57:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:57:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:57:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5880E44FDD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1183097533.2073.1305086207359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-6171: --------------------------- Attachment: MAPRED-6171.patch > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch, MAPRED-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14646-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 04:00:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2BD748D2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6794 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:00:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6770 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:00:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6762 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 04:00:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:00:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:00:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8A4440EE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:59:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1496496939.2081.1305086390434.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21922935.186601292622961312.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7068) Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7068: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks, Luke! > Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7068-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-7068-trunk-v2.patch > > > The problem is introduced by HADOOP-6486. Which have caused a lot of mysterious artifact issues (unable to downgrade or do parallel dev, without wiping out both m2 and ivy caches etc.) wasting countless hours of dev (many people's) time to track down the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14647-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 04:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3560740A4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13192 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12992 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 04:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12978 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 04:16:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:16:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E4344516 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 04:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 04:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1741005890.2089.1305087347360.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21922935.186601292622961312.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7068) Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031530#comment-13031530 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7068: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #588 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/588/]) HADOOP-7068. Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7068-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-7068-trunk-v2.patch > > > The problem is introduced by HADOOP-6486. Which have caused a lot of mysterious artifact issues (unable to downgrade or do parallel dev, without wiping out both m2 and ivy caches etc.) wasting countless hours of dev (many people's) time to track down the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14649-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:53:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C97454E18 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80536 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:53:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80288 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80265 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9DA45B94 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1112698860.2202.1305093167388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031551#comment-13031551 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6171: ------------------------------------- Hey Ted. Thanks for providing the patches! Unfortunately with the way the project is currently structured, we need to have a separate JIRA for each project (common, hdfs, and mr). Could you open new JIRAs on those projects and "Link" them to this one? You can then upload the individual patches there. > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch, MAPRED-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14648-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 05:53:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C94974E17 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80400 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:53:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80283 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 05:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80266 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 05:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:53:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B68A45B96 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1962419078.2204.1305093167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6171) "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-6171: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Ted Yu > "package" task in build.xml should copy source with preservelastmodified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6171 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6171 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-6171.patch, HDFS-6171.patch, MAPRED-6171.patch > > > In the package task, it copies the source to dist.dir without using preservelastmodified=true. This can cause issues with the autotools configure process for the C++ builds. Namely, it will sometimes think the configure script is out of date with respect to its source files and try to re-bootstrap, which relies on particular versions of autotools on the building computer. This isn't something that should be required for those wanting to build from a distribution tarball. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14650-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 09:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B9904EDA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68764 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68698 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 09:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68682 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 09:43:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:43:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:43:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A7A451C0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <48925858.2560.1305106967331.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21922935.186601292622961312.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7068) Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031617#comment-13031617 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7068: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #45 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/45/]) Merge -r 1101734:1101735 from trunk to branch-0.22. Fixes: HADOOP-7068 > Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7068-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-7068-trunk-v2.patch > > > The problem is introduced by HADOOP-6486. Which have caused a lot of mysterious artifact issues (unable to downgrade or do parallel dev, without wiping out both m2 and ivy caches etc.) wasting countless hours of dev (many people's) time to track down the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14652-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F164831 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95362 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95292 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95275 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671CA4528A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1031285691.2702.1305112488418.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031641#comment-13031641 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7272: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-7272. Remove unnecessary security related info logs. Contributed by Suresh Srinivas. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14653-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2203D4849 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95708 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95660 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95609 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA004529F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1825950652.2722.1305112489039.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6920) Metrics2: metrics instrumentation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031644#comment-13031644 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6920: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-6920. Metrics instrumentation to move new metrics2 framework. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics2: metrics instrumentation > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6920 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6920 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6920-metrics2-inst-v4.patch, hadoop-6920.v6.patch > > > The jira tracks the metrics instrumentation for the new framework, i.e., porting jvm and rpc metrics to the new framework. > This issue (esp. the "incompatible change flag") depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in HADOOP-6728) on whether we should support backward compatibility (at some cost.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14651-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6B84482F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95356 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95289 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95274 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F87D4528D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1767770911.2705.1305112488518.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1912220915.31712.1304917443296.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7268) FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031642#comment-13031642 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7268: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-7268. FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens. Contributed by jitendra. > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() behavior needs to be fixed w.r.t tokens > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7268 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7268.1.patch > > > FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext() instantiates a FileContext object upon the first call to it, and for all subsequent calls returns back that instance (a static localFsSingleton object). With security turned on, this causes some hard-to-debug situations when that fileContext is used for doing HDFS operations. This is because the UserGroupInformation is stored when a FileContext is instantiated. If the process in question wishes to use different UserGroupInformation objects for different file system operations (where the corresponding FileContext objects are obtained via calls to FileContext.getLocalFSFileContext()), it doesn't work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14654-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C5F44869 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96073 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96041 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96033 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5992E45288 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <195760776.2700.1305112488363.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2068463279.801.1305050747377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7271) Standardize error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031640#comment-13031640 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7271: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-7271. Standardize shell command error messages. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Standardize error messages > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7271 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7271-2.patch, HADOOP-7271.patch > > > The FsShell commands have no standard format for the same error message. For instance, here is a snippet of the variations of just one of many error messages: > cmd: $path: No such file or directory > cmd: cannot stat `$path': No such file or directory > cmd: Can not find listing for $path > cmd: Cannot access $path: No such file or directory. > cmd: No such file or directory `$path' > cmd: File does not exist: $path > cmd: File $path does not exist > ... etc ... > These need to be common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14655-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 410504875 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96241 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96190 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96047 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD64C45293 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1534390063.2711.1305112488706.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <21922935.186601292622961312.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7068) Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031643#comment-13031643 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7068: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-7068. Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Ivy resolve force mode should be turned off by default > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7068 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7068-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-7068-trunk-v2.patch > > > The problem is introduced by HADOOP-6486. Which have caused a lot of mysterious artifact issues (unable to downgrade or do parallel dev, without wiping out both m2 and ivy caches etc.) wasting countless hours of dev (many people's) time to track down the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14656-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 11:15:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62659491E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96698 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96668 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 11:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96660 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 11:15:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:15:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0A8452A2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:14:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <48645378.2724.1305112489107.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1243264568.21599.1301502005765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7214) Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031645#comment-13031645 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7214: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #685 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/685/]) HADOOP-7214. Add Common functionality necessary to provide an equivalent of /usr/bin/groups for Hadoop. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. > Hadoop /usr/bin/groups equivalent > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7214 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7214 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7214.0.txt, hadoop-7214.1.txt, hadoop-7214.10.patch, hadoop-7214.11.patch, hadoop-7214.2.txt, hadoop-7214.3.txt, hadoop-7214.4.txt, hadoop-7214.5.txt, hadoop-7214.6.txt, hadoop-7214.7.patch, hadoop-7214.8.patch, hadoop-7214.9.patch > > > Since user -> groups resolution is done on the NN and JT machines, there should be a way for users to determine what groups they're a member of from the NN's and JT's perspective. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14657-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 14:12:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 657F146AC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11163 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:12:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11131 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11122 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 14:12:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830F245912 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <713216923.3080.1305123107533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7237: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7237.patch > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14658-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 14:12:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC5846CF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11653 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11583 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11491 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 14:12:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946AD45917 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1111741355.3082.1305123107604.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7237: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14659-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 14:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B294308 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45810 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45777 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45769 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 14:24:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDE945FDA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2115651099.3122.1305123827373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031723#comment-13031723 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7237: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478822/HADOOP-7237.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/427//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/427//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/427//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14660-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 14:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 515BA4809 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15852 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15817 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15804 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8A3451DF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1881213413.3225.1305125867502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7267.patch > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14661-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 14:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81FCC4814 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16082 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16046 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15877 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 14:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B870451E1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <797310640.3227.1305125867568.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14662-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:08:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DF0D413E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33443 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33414 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33406 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A27C456E2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: util Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 Reporter: Jonathan Eagles Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 {noformat} throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14663-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:08:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2F01414C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33742 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33657 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33641 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:08:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:08:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB070456E7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <989084922.3255.1305126467762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Eagles reassigned HADOOP-7274: --------------------------------------- Assignee: Jonathan Eagles (was: Konstantin Boudnik) > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14664-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FFC842A1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41123 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41089 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41072 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:12:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4FF45886 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1919985336.3267.1305126707366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Eagles updated HADOOP-7274: ------------------------------------ Description: Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch {noformat} throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); {noformat} was: {noformat} throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); {noformat} Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) (was: 0.22.0) 0.20.204.0 Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) (was: 0.22.0) > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14665-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:14:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C72845E8 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50470 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:14:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50439 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50431 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:14:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:14:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687B6459BC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1573938455.3271.1305126827424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031770#comment-13031770 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7267: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478830/HADOOP-7267.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/428//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/428//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/428//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14666-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:16:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7321A4C30 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56808 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:16:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56770 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56762 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:16:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:16:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:16:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9075D45B08 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:16:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <431322288.3277.1305126965588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031772#comment-13031772 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7237: ------------------------------------- +1 looks good. > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14667-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:20:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EC664CC4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69321 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69290 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69275 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B61245CF4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1356062114.3289.1305127187436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031776#comment-13031776 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7267: ------------------------------------- The findbugs warning is not in the code that I modified. Note that it is in code that will soon be removed. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14668-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE9994CFA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2957 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:32:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2917 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:32:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2904 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:32:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:32:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22EF452EC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gabriele Kahlout (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1750428105.3327.1305127907661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6763) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabriele Kahlout updated HADOOP-6763: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6763 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch, HADOOP-6763.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14669-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:34:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0CB44706 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5769 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5724 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5530 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F604540B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gabriele Kahlout (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1136202074.3336.1305128027492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6763) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031785#comment-13031785 ] Gabriele Kahlout commented on HADOOP-6763: ------------------------------------------ okay, then shouldn't the fix version be set to 0.22? > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6763 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch, HADOOP-6763.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14670-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D10A4714 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6376 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:34:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6341 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:34:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6333 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:34:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899294540D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1498166397.3338.1305128027560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031786#comment-13031786 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7267: ------------------------------------- +1 The code seems to do what it did before. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14671-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DC3844E0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21340 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21303 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21295 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6F545AAD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1463086596.3365.1305128747440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Eagles updated HADOOP-7274: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14672-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6D994501 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21741 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21711 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21663 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:46:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9520845AB6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1604970339.3371.1305128747607.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Eagles updated HADOOP-7274: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14673-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:48:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 754684035 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26596 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26474 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26466 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:48:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:48:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7D145C19 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1518782908.3375.1305128867436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031794#comment-13031794 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7274: ----------------------------------------- No new tests are needed for this typo-fix issue. > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14674-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75B1F407D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30313 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30234 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30150 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C18745CC6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1912767830.3385.1305128987373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031796#comment-13031796 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7274: ----------------------------------------- No tests were added. Eclipse and javadoc warnings are previously present in the security branch [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 Eclipse classpath. The patch causes the Eclipse classpath to differ from the contents of the lib directories. [exec] > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14675-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 15:54:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B85C8428B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35637 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35599 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 15:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35591 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 15:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13ED45F37 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <635143507.3392.1305129227657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031798#comment-13031798 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7274: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478834/HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/429//console This message is automatically generated. > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14676-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:02:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0336455B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44061 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43993 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43963 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:02:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097B645383 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <928862306.3422.1305129708035.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031806#comment-13031806 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7274: ----------------------------------------- The attached patch only applies to the security branch and not the trunk. > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14677-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:10:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5A7D4D73 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63927 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:10:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63852 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:10:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63834 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:10:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:10:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8646C457CB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Refactor FsShell's stat ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-7275 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14678-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B58A14A57 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94156 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94095 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93878 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061D645EB9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <91100625.3517.1305130788021.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7275: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7275.patch > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14679-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:20:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01AEF4A63 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94335 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94285 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94187 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BC945EBB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <514910218.3519.1305130788405.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7275: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14680-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:22:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B3874D43 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98628 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98600 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98592 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104645F8D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7276 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: native Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper Target: arm-linux-gnueabi Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi Thread model: posix gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) $ uname -a Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux Reporter: Trevor Robinson The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. $ ant -Dcompile.native=true ... [exec] make all-am [exec] make[1]: Entering directory `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14681-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:28:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2F894FE8 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13607 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13558 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13550 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:28:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:28:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0245249 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <485512998.3544.1305131267384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Robinson updated HADOOP-7276: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-common-arm.patch This patch introduces an AM_CONDITIONAL called SPECIFY_DATA_MODEL that is disabled when host_cpu starts with "arm" (and is easily extensible for other CPUs). -m$(JVM_DATA_MODEL) is only added to AM_CFLAGS and AM_LDFLAGS when SPECIFY_DATA_MODEL is true. > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14682-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 16:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FFB7475B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22174 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:34:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22130 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 16:34:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22122 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 16:34:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:34:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591DB4545A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1797979305.3556.1305131627361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031834#comment-13031834 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7275: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478843/HADOOP-7275.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/430//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/430//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/430//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14683-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:24:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96F764858 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4077 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3970 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3962 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601D2459EB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.20.205.0 This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14684-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:34:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEACA4FF6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17734 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17696 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17672 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7B545ECD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2017704214.3719.1305135227829.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch Rearrange files to proposed directory structure rather than using symlinks for 0.20security branch. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14685-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:44:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FFEE424C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32690 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32655 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32644 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC064530D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1934309629.3774.1305135827650.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7277: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch Patch for the 0.20-security branch > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14686-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC5C425A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32957 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32921 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32913 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61E84533B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <566677411.3805.1305135828939.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031881#comment-13031881 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478846/HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/431//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14687-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3834E426E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33242 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33193 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33180 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CB24533F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <672567595.3807.1305135828994.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7277: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14688-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:52:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DBAA4A87 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42516 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42485 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42476 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B8F45708 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:51:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1483103966.3855.1305136308605.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031886#comment-13031886 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------------- Patch should be against trunk right? > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14689-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 17:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F20594AE4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44322 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44266 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44258 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B665245827 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1635990069.3860.1305136427743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031888#comment-13031888 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7277: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478849/HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch against trunk revision 1101735. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/432//console This message is automatically generated. > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14690-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA80049C2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57147 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57105 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57097 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86245D38 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272741462.3945.1305136908318.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031894#comment-13031894 ] Jeffrey Naisbitt commented on HADOOP-7277: ------------------------------------------ The patch is for the 0.20-security branch, so the above results should be ignored. Here are the results from my manual run: [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 Eclipse classpath. The patch causes the Eclipse classpath to differ from the contents of the lib directories. The javadoc and Eclipse classpath issues are unrelated to these changes. I'm also not sure why it says 6 new/modified tests are included since none are included in this patch. None are needed though since it's just eclipse things. > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14691-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19D70416B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79894 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79850 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79757 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D5F45577 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation -------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7278 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 Environment: Apache Jenkins Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14692-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:25:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A014FE4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 607 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:25:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 545 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 537 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:25:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F27E45BD9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2059519263.4060.1305138287451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7278: --------------------------------------- Description: It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14693-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:25:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8D6A400A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1444 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1408 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1400 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:25:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D82845BDD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1447049747.4064.1305138287576.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031921#comment-13031921 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7275: ------------------------------------- +1 The code looks good. > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14694-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:27:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3E1D4038 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4861 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4828 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4820 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:27:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:27:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:27:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE2845CD8 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Adrian Cole (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <372749453.4066.1305138407782.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031923#comment-13031923 ] Adrian Cole commented on HADOOP-7278: ------------------------------------- seems like the ideal case for whirr, right? http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/ > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14695-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:29:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC414069 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6596 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6568 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6560 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:29:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74A45E60 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2120909595.4100.1305138529641.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031925#comment-13031925 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- > Patch should be against trunk right? Yes, there are 2 set of patches, one for trunk and one for 0.20 security branch. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14696-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:29:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E68CC409E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7840 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:29:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7808 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7800 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:29:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:29:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF9745E6D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:28:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Travis Crawford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1531104333.4106.1305138529840.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6746) hadoop-daemon.sh does not append to log files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Crawford updated HADOOP-6746: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > hadoop-daemon.sh does not append to log files > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6746 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6746 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Travis Crawford > Attachments: HADOOP-6746.patch > > > Looking in hadoop-daemon.sh we see the start command redirects logs to the log file by creating a new file. It does not append to the log. > nohup nice -n $HADOOP_NICENESS "$HADOOP_HOME"/bin/hadoop --config $HADOOP_CONF_DIR $command "$@" > "$log" 2>&1 < /dev/null & > I believe output should be appended to the log file so logrotate copytruncate works. Currently a large log file cannot be truncated without restarting the running service, which causes issues in production environments. > The improved line would be exactly the same, except use >> to open the log file in append mode. > nohup nice -n $HADOOP_NICENESS "$HADOOP_HOME"/bin/hadoop --config $HADOOP_CONF_DIR $command "$@" >> "$log" 2>&1 < /dev/null & -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14697-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:38:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 827E047CD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23829 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23794 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23784 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:38:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74346452F0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1636054751.4136.1305139067472.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7275: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks John for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14698-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 18:56:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9435A413F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54914 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54871 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54863 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703E245E24 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1425338217.4200.1305140147456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031949#comment-13031949 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7275: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #589 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/589/]) HADOOP-7275. Refactor the stat commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14699-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:00:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C34F84472 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61470 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61447 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61435 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:00:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66184502F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2063829655.4212.1305140388808.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7237: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7237-1.patch Resolve merge conflicts from removal of other commands. > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237-1.patch, HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14700-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:10:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BF764BC5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89455 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:10:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89411 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89378 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:10:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:10:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC32045723 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1577742967.4303.1305140987898.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031973#comment-13031973 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7278: -------------------------------------------- Here's the idea (and the workflow Roman and I had in mind): - a Jenkins job creates a set of tar-balls for all components (similar to [what is done here|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-Build/] - a primitive .deb package (all build machines are Ubuntu based) is created which contains all bits and pieces with required permissions, etc.) and uploaded to a shared location where all build machines can see it - an event is triggered once the package is ready puppet is executed on a designated set of machines to install the package into /opt/hadoop, generate configs, and start required services - a validation workload is started by Hudson This JIRA is going to have a couple of patches: - .deb creation script - puppet recipes > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14701-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B22064C85 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95210 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95163 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95155 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:12:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7DB45871 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1511272010.4311.1305141107515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031974#comment-13031974 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7278: -------------------------------------------- Whirr might or mightn't be a better solution for this task, but certainly will be an additional learning curve ;) > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14702-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A52B4CEE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1055 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1027 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1019 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0CF459BD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1030873600.4327.1305141227381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031976#comment-13031976 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7237: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478860/HADOOP-7237-1.patch against trunk revision 1102012. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/433//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/433//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/433//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7237-1.patch, HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14703-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B6614959 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55919 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55874 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55674 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD99B824F4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1566404120.4413.1305143147707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7279) Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7279 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.22.0 Right now, some of the common resources (eg hadoop.css) are duplicated between common and dependent projects, since HDFS and MR can't actually load these resources out of the common "static" webapp. I'd like to rename common's "static" webapp to "common/static", and host it at a different URL in the dependent projects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14704-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 19:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 991334614 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65648 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:51:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65616 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 19:51:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65608 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 19:51:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:51:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFA4826F0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1825469730.4433.1305143447565.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6311) Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031997#comment-13031997 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on HADOOP-6311: ------------------------------------------ bq. It may be some work to backport onto 20-append I think I'll try to backport it to 20-append in order to test and benchmark with the HBASE-3529. Unless HBase is going to upgrade to a newer Hadoop version soon? > Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: native > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: 6311-trunk-inprogress.txt, hadoop-6311.txt > > > For HDFS-347 we need to use unix domain sockets. This JIRA is to include a library in common which adds a o.a.h.net.unix package based on the code from Android (apache 2 license) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14705-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:07:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 890F44F4A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92016 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:07:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91980 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:07:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91971 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:07:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:07:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:07:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D5E82F3A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <434615293.4543.1305144407540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032021#comment-13032021 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7278: -------------------------------------------- Here's some more thoughts and background information about the JIRA: - there's a number of machines which aren't used by the build system right now and they can be used for on-cluster testing of Hadoop night builds or releases - .deb packaging seems like a very nice idea because it provides certain consistency, versioning, etc. However, it might be a bit of over-kill for the simple task at hands (thanks Eli for pointing this out;) - we'd rather skip .deb creation and will do installation of Hadoop right out of the tar-balls into a shared NFS location. Standard Hadoop scripts will be used for start/stop control of the daemons. - for simplicity sake list of slaves and configuration files will be checked into the SVN (we might want use common or have a separate top-level directory designated for cluster management related issues) > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14706-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:27:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB0C64A60 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43402 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43372 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43364 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:27:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03E2456EB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2099870110.4593.1305145607718.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7237: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks John for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7237-1.patch, HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14707-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB39A4A6F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43665 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43639 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43631 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:27:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A2E456E7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1586129148.4589.1305145607593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu reassigned HADOOP-7189: ------------------------------ Assignee: Ted Yu > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14708-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:36:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6001C44CD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63407 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63375 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63367 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:36:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D8845ABF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1297545513.4606.1305146147397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032036#comment-13032036 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7237: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #590 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/590/]) HADOOP-7237. Refactor the touchz commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7237-1.patch, HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14709-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:38:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEEE345E4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66684 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:38:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66627 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66615 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:38:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:38:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:38:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85E945C34 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <534273819.4620.1305146267751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7267-2.patch upmerge to resolve conflict from removal of other commands > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14710-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796664707 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75426 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75385 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75376 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:44:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B34345F23 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <44673766.4636.1305146627370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032044#comment-13032044 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7267: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478879/HADOOP-7267-2.patch against trunk revision 1102068. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/434//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14711-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:50:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 740034D60 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87682 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:50:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87656 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87648 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:50:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:50:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:50:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAB982180 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Gabriele Kahlout (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <672101949.4651.1305146987450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6763) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032051#comment-13032051 ] Gabriele Kahlout commented on HADOOP-6763: ------------------------------------------ $ svn co -r 941662 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.21/ hadoop $ ant -f hadoop/build.xml I still get verbose logging at each command 11/05/11 22:45:39 INFO security.Groups: Group mapping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout=300000 > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6763 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch, HADOOP-6763.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14712-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 20:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7327D4F57 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95028 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94960 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 20:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94949 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 20:55:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5642682305 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2069719117.4664.1305147287349.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7267-3.patch upmerge again, third time is a charm... > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267-3.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14713-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:03:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48F594791 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5329 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5300 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5291 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:03:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E087825EA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <84597352.4689.1305147767381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-7189: --------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7189.txt This patch is based on Todd's patch. Introduced an environment variable to control the addition of debug option. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14714-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27C434C82 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21747 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21703 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21695 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010A882B77 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <364647320.4742.1305148428000.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated HADOOP-6846: --------------------------------- Summary: Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release (was: Scripts for building Hadoop 0.21.0 release) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14715-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5489A4C92 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21982 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21908 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21814 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F33582B79 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1986708733.4744.1305148428059.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032065#comment-13032065 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7267: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478880/HADOOP-7267-3.patch against trunk revision 1102068. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/435//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/435//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/435//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267-3.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14716-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:16:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D9D6410E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25561 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25526 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25513 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22C282C90 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <719436442.4755.1305148547726.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated HADOOP-6846: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6846.patch I pulled the tar-munge file out of release-scripts.tar.gz and attached it as a patch. Commit to hadoop/nightly, ensure that the file is executable. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14717-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:16:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C31384125 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25809 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25775 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25766 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0B182C95 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1498901305.4760.1305148547902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032067#comment-13032067 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7189: ------------------------------------- Looks good, though I would suggest using HADOOP_JAAS_DEBUG as the environment variable. Our convention is that env vars are ALL_CAPITAL_LETTERS, reserving dot.separated.words for conf options. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14718-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BAEC413E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26208 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26175 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26167 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0A882CA2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1915575342.4773.1305148548300.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7267: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, Daryn! Also thanks John for reviewing it. > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267-3.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14719-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 157674B64 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31154 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:18:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31111 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31103 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:18:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C3082D97 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Whang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2143050801.4779.1305148667946.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Whang updated HADOOP-7189: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7189.patch identical to HADOOP-7189.txt, but with test case > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14720-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD2D843E7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32741 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:20:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32716 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32708 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C7E82E9F for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1514758357.4790.1305148787736.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated HADOOP-6846: --------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Tom White and I (phunt) worked on this as part of the hackathon. It allows a hadoop-0.22.0 tar.gz file to be generated by the jenkins build, which can be seen here: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-Build/9/ (hadoop-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz includes core/hdfs/mapred tar.gz's) After committing this change (hadoop/nightly) edit the build configuration on jenkins to remove this section from "execute shell": --- # for the moment pull my version wget --no-check-certificate http://github.com/phunt/hadoop-nightly/raw/master/tar-munge chmod a+x tar-munge mv tar-munge ${WORKSPACE}/nightly/tar-munge --- > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14721-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:22:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC0D44CB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38682 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38631 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38451 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBE082F9B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <368969917.4804.1305148907519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032078#comment-13032078 ] Patrick Hunt commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------------- Tom, I just noticed that you did not check "grant for inclusion" on your release-scripts.tar.gz attachment, can you please comment on this jira granting such (given I pulled the patch from that archive). Thanks. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14722-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23E63450C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40179 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40141 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40132 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CF6820A2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <239994899.4823.1305149028155.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-7189: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7189.txt) > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14723-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:26:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9FA54584 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43831 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:26:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43793 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43785 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:26:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:26:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50458219A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <182579425.4844.1305149147934.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HADOOP-7189: --------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7189.txt Changed the name of environment variable according to Todd's suggestion. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14724-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:34:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A4E34D19 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60591 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60517 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60284 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B6582448 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <413781321.4868.1305149627457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032090#comment-13032090 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6846: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478884/HADOOP-6846.patch against trunk revision 1102093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/436//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/436//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/436//console This message is automatically generated. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14725-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:36:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D9E24D6D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62286 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62246 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62238 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A695824F6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1660614550.4882.1305149747498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6311) Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated HADOOP-6311: ------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Here's a patch for Hadoop 0.20 append. There's one test failure as noted below. ant run-test-core {quote} Test org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestSinkQueue FAILED {quote} > Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: 6311-trunk-inprogress.txt, hadoop-6311.txt > > > For HDFS-347 we need to use unix domain sockets. This JIRA is to include a library in common which adds a o.a.h.net.unix package based on the code from Android (apache 2 license) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14726-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:36:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 815974D7E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62578 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62522 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62514 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFCA824F4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <440406233.4880.1305149747443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032091#comment-13032091 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #591 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/591/]) HADOOP-7267. Refactor the rm/rmr/expunge commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267-3.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14727-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:40:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C94D4E2C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67938 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67879 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67871 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:40:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:40:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FBF825E6 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <177085104.4897.1305149987397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1566404120.4413.1305143147707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7279) Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032093#comment-13032093 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7279: --------------------------------- changing /static would break many downstream dependencies that use common HttpServer. Why can't hdfs and mr use /static for common resources and /hdfs/static and mr/static for their respective resources? Of course separate servlets (DefaultServlet would suffice) need to be registered with HttpServer to serve the latter. > Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Right now, some of the common resources (eg hadoop.css) are duplicated between common and dependent projects, since HDFS and MR can't actually load these resources out of the common "static" webapp. > I'd like to rename common's "static" webapp to "common/static", and host it at a different URL in the dependent projects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14728-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DAA84E9D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72181 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72146 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72132 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BF182727 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1823874475.4923.1305150227954.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6311) Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032096#comment-13032096 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6311: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12476942/6311-trunk-inprogress.txt against trunk revision 1102093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/437//console This message is automatically generated. > Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: 6311-trunk-inprogress.txt, hadoop-6311.txt > > > For HDFS-347 we need to use unix domain sockets. This JIRA is to include a library in common which adds a o.a.h.net.unix package based on the code from Android (apache 2 license) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14729-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 21:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 784BB4EB7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72468 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72440 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72432 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 21:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0156F82729 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <627663417.4925.1305150228002.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1566404120.4413.1305143147707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7279) Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032097#comment-13032097 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7279: ------------------------------------- What are the downstream dependencies that depend on it? /static is only the hadoop.css file - do we have a lot of stuff depending on that being at the particular URL? > Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Right now, some of the common resources (eg hadoop.css) are duplicated between common and dependent projects, since HDFS and MR can't actually load these resources out of the common "static" webapp. > I'd like to rename common's "static" webapp to "common/static", and host it at a different URL in the dependent projects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14730-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:00:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F30E149C9 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 367 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:00:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 328 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 311 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:00:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:00:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:00:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28A182CDD for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <352311681.4974.1305151187661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1566404120.4413.1305143147707.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7279) Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032105#comment-13032105 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7279: --------------------------------- I'm not talking about hadoop.css per se, rather, the default HttpServer serves /static from resource base webapps/static. I _think_ you can achieve what you want without changing the user facing URL (/static). > Static web resources should not be duplicated between projects > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7279 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Right now, some of the common resources (eg hadoop.css) are duplicated between common and dependent projects, since HDFS and MR can't actually load these resources out of the common "static" webapp. > I'd like to rename common's "static" webapp to "common/static", and host it at a different URL in the dependent projects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14731-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:14:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C4414100 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23586 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:14:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23548 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23540 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:14:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15C982289 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <499651441.5038.1305152027788.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032117#comment-13032117 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6846: ----------------------------------- I grant the patch for inclusion. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14732-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:14:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37C3D411E for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23964 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23897 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23880 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445E882298 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2122171513.5053.1305152028276.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6311) Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032120#comment-13032120 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on HADOOP-6311: ------------------------------------------ Sorry, misspoke, the patch option wasn't given in Jira so there's no file, however the patch was mistakenly for Hadoop trunk. The port to 0.20-append is a bit more complex. > Add support for unix domain sockets to JNI libs > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: 6311-trunk-inprogress.txt, hadoop-6311.txt > > > For HDFS-347 we need to use unix domain sockets. This JIRA is to include a library in common which adds a o.a.h.net.unix package based on the code from Android (apache 2 license) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14733-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:36:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E723D430D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59419 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59355 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59340 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68E582B4D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1388074373.5162.1305153347678.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032140#comment-13032140 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #592 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/592/]) HADOOP-6846. Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14734-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:47:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8064546B0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70103 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:47:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69995 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:47:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69987 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:47:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E2782DEF for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1456162067.5192.1305154007680.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14735-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:47:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87F6F46F5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70291 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70249 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:47:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70241 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:47:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8277C82DEA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1578887688.5187.1305154007531.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032144#comment-13032144 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7189: ------------------------------------- +1 for Ted's patch. Unfortunately I wasn't able to use the test that Andrew contributed, since this feature happens in a static initialization block and depends on an env var. I manually tested by running the UGI class from the command line with and without the env var set to "true". > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14736-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:51:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 457994B40 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74716 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:51:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74678 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:51:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74670 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:51:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:51:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACA882F70 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <835669386.5234.1305154247434.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 22 and trunk. Thanks, Ted! > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14737-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 22:53:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B51084B8B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75920 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:53:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75895 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 22:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75887 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 22:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:53:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89A8200B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1667126489.5247.1305154367781.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032150#comment-13032150 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #664 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/664/]) HADOOP-6846. Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14738-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:06:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 172DA440A for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87493 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87465 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87457 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:06:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:06:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:06:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077B182502 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:05:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <766882019.5304.1305155148027.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032164#comment-13032164 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #593 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/593/]) HADOOP-7189. Add ability to enable debug property in JAAS configuration. Contributed by Ted Yu. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14739-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:20:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C7DA4CFB for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3376 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3282 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3065 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C0D8289D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Forrest Vines (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2105947079.5333.1305155987356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7280) ChainReducer uses MAPPER_BY_VALUE instead of REDUCER_BY_VALUE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 ChainReducer uses MAPPER_BY_VALUE instead of REDUCER_BY_VALUE ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7280 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7280 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Forrest Vines Priority: Minor On line 293 of o.a.h.mapred.lib.Chain in setReducer(...): reducerConf.setBoolean(MAPPER_BY_VALUE, byValue); this should be REDUCER_BY_VALUE. http://grepcode.com/file/repository.cloudera.com/content/repositories/releases/com.cloudera.hadoop/hadoop-core/0.20.2-737/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/lib/Chain.java#293 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14740-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:38:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD6EF4773 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22641 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22589 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22581 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2AF82DEA for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1304102508.5391.1305157067845.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7281: ---------------------------------- Component/s: documentation Fix Version/s: site > update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: 203.diff > > > Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14741-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:38:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04D41477D for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22868 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22809 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22631 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:38:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC14582DEC for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <889650419.5393.1305157067898.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7281: ---------------------------------- Attachment: 203.diff > update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: 203.diff > > > Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14742-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AACD47B2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23498 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23452 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23312 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:38:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD6E82DE7 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release --------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7281 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Attachments: 203.diff Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14743-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE4EC4884 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31814 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31747 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31728 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:44:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A182FD5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <316140930.5422.1305157427550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032182#comment-13032182 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7281: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm (none generated stuff :) > update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: 203.diff > > > Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14744-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D1114371 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33211 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33171 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33158 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61B9820D2 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <37537479.5429.1305157547677.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7281. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] > update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: 203.diff > > > Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14745-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4946343AE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33628 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33577 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33285 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD366820D5 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1963195821.5432.1305157547771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1035897564.5388.1305157067762.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7281) update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley closed HADOOP-7281. --------------------------------- > update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7281 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7281 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: 203.diff > > > Update site to include the 0.20.203.0 release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14746-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 11 23:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD668401C for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42715 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42686 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2011 23:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42609 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2011 23:58:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803D823A1 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1107563711.5451.1305158267488.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2105947079.5333.1305155987356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7280) ChainReducer uses MAPPER_BY_VALUE instead of REDUCER_BY_VALUE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032188#comment-13032188 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7280: ------------------------------------- Hi Forrest. Would you mind attaching an svn patch to fix this issue? Also, I will move this bug to the MAPREDUCE project, since it is MR-specific. > ChainReducer uses MAPPER_BY_VALUE instead of REDUCER_BY_VALUE > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7280 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7280 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Forrest Vines > Priority: Minor > > On line 293 of o.a.h.mapred.lib.Chain in setReducer(...): > reducerConf.setBoolean(MAPPER_BY_VALUE, byValue); > this should be REDUCER_BY_VALUE. > http://grepcode.com/file/repository.cloudera.com/content/repositories/releases/com.cloudera.hadoop/hadoop-core/0.20.2-737/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/lib/Chain.java#293 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14747-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 00:08:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5626547B2 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54006 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 00:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53971 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 00:08:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53963 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 00:08:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:08:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:08:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A01982655 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:07:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1904881673.5500.1305158868299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6763) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032193#comment-13032193 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6763: ----------------------------------- Yes, this should have fix version 0.22. > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6763 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch, HADOOP-6763.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14748-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 00:11:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB86B481B for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55352 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 00:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55319 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 00:11:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55307 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 00:11:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:11:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6F382728 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 00:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:10:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1032573540.5534.1305159048440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6763) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6763: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6763 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6763 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch, HADOOP-6763.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14749-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 01:24:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 639C14FA0 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34526 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34478 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34470 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 01:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECFE44DCD for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 01:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <258076528.5755.1305163427384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032225#comment-13032225 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch #47 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch/47/]) HADOOP-6846. Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14750-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 04:34:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66AF15E56 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39791 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:34:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39527 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 04:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39507 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 04:34:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:34:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8515482348 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 04:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1698510852.5928.1305174827541.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032249#comment-13032249 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7278: ------------------------------------- To be clear, a single Jenkins build slave will be running the coordination of all this, but the cluster that is stood up will be running on non-slave machines, right? > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14751-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 10:57:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B8955C75 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21301 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 10:57:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21128 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 10:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21117 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 10:57:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:57:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:57:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9BE828DE for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 10:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1274968774.6476.1305197807769.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032355#comment-13032355 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1180 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/1180/]) HADOOP-6846. Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14752-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 13:32:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72D505445 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4194 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4161 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4153 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C991A871D5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <887707551.6705.1305207107820.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032404#comment-13032404 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #686 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/686/]) HADOOP-7189. Add ability to enable debug property in JAAS configuration. Contributed by Ted Yu. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14753-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 13:32:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 987FD5458 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4303 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4201 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4162 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D90871DB for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1222420961.6711.1305207108008.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1648991564.3455.1305130187546.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7275) Refactor FsShell's stat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032406#comment-13032406 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7275: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #686 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/686/]) HADOOP-7275. Refactor the stat commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's stat > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7275 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7275 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7275.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14754-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 13:32:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26F6C546B for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4678 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4642 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4634 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 13:32:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A145871DD for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <837054086.6713.1305207108103.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032407#comment-13032407 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #686 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/686/]) HADOOP-6846. Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release. > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14755-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 13:32:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90EC754B2 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5350 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5313 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5256 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B047871D0 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <488384700.6700.1305207107631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1110985885.74832.1303423445828.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7237) Refactor FsShell's touchz MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032403#comment-13032403 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7237: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #686 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/686/]) HADOOP-7237. Refactor the touchz commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's touchz > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7237 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7237 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7237-1.patch, HADOOP-7237.patch > > > Need to refactor touchz to conform to new FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14756-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 13:32:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37A454C8 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5558 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5512 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5445 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 13:32:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41F1871D8 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <25631010.6708.1305207107931.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <873708488.29176.1304715003217.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7267) Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032405#comment-13032405 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7267: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #686 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/686/]) HADOOP-7267. Refactor the rm/rmr/expunge commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp > Refactor FsShell's rm/rmr/expunge > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7267 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7267-2.patch, HADOOP-7267-3.patch, HADOOP-7267.patch > > > Refactor to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14757-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 14:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9A0B5CF7 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8379 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 14:34:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8329 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 14:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8265 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 14:34:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:34:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348ED87B66 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:33:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: John George Assignee: John George Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14758-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 15:03:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03885574F for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46024 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45994 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45982 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 15:03:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622D287835 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1972822828.6924.1305212567398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John George updated HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7282.patch diffs.txt > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14759-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 15:03:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 555755764 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46393 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:03:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46345 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46301 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 15:03:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE9A87839 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <109984612.6928.1305212567512.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032446#comment-13032446 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7282: ------------------------------------- Please ignore the "diffs.txt" file - that was accidentally uploaded. Sorry for the confusion . > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.20.205.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14760-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 15:10:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F7F85D10 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58411 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58386 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58378 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 15:10:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DD487B4B for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1314872738.6950.1305212988100.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John George updated HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.205.0) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14761-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 16:24:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35D7D5274 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82428 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:24:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82363 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:24:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82355 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 16:24:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:24:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7695887888 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1557823194.7157.1305217427482.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032486#comment-13032486 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7189: ------------------------------------------------ Forgot to run tests and set fix versions? > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14762-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 16:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64F6253A3 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43466 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43433 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 16:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43425 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 16:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B94F876FA for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <785924055.7266.1305219467290.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff Attached is a patch that adds basic support for key/value metadata when creating files with a FileSystem. FileSystems that don't support metadata will simply discard any that is provided. Keys are dependant on the FileSystem being used, in the case of s3native, they're used as HTTP headers and should match the headers available here: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/ I'm not sure how I feel about this approach. On the one hand, it's fairly abstract and flexible. On the other, it makes the assertion that metadata is always a Map which may prove fairly restrictive. Still, I can't think of a better way to do it. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14763-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 17:00:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2911356CC for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48850 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48829 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48821 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 17:00:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:00:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:00:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FC287836 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 16:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:59:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <154765593.7269.1305219592094.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Nicholas Telford Release Note: Added support for arbitrary file metadata when creating a new file on a FileSystem that supports metadata. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch attached that implements the provision of arbitrary FileSystem metadata when creating a file. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14764-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 17:02:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8116F5FCA for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53416 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53383 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53375 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 17:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C8587920 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1761724315.7278.1305219708458.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032509#comment-13032509 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7277: --------------------------------------- +1 Ran the eclipse target, tried a unit test. I committed this to the 20-security branch. Thanks, Jeff! > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14765-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 17:02:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CEDD500C for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53683 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:02:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53649 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 17:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53641 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 17:02:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843A787923 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1405311599.7281.1305219708538.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7277: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14766-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:22:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69A7F5A41 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95756 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95690 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95588 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:22:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:22:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B246B87A78 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2142927778.7596.1305224508727.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6728: ---------------------------- Description: Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. * Support metrics schema for plugins. The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. [The current design wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2]. was: Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. * Support metrics schema for plugins. The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. > [The current design wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2]. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14767-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FA975137 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22442 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22404 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22351 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:40:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:40:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:40:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33D78714D for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1203870342.7638.1305225587796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6921) metrics2: metrics plugins MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu resolved HADOOP-6921. ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Release Note: Metrics names are standardized to CapitalizedCamelCase. See release note of HADOOP-6918 and HADOOP-6920. Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] > metrics2: metrics plugins > ------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6921 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6921 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > This jira tracks the porting of builtin metrics sink plugins (file, ganglia) for the new metrics framework. > Whether or not ganglia 3.0/3.1 plugins will be ported depends on the outcome of the discussion (proposed in the parent issue: HADOOP-6728) on backward compatibility (at some cost/limitations of course.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14768-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:42:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97BAB51B6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25757 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:42:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25726 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:42:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25718 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:42:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:42:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:42:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A4787249 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <456709527.7650.1305225707408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7283) Include 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries in Jenkins tarball builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Include 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries in Jenkins tarball builds -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7283 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7283 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Components: build Reporter: Tom White Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.22.0 The job at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-Build/ is building tarballs, but they do not currently include both 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries. We should update/duplicate hadoop-nighly/hudsonBuildHadoopRelease.sh to support post-split builds. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14769-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8821D5251 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32919 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32872 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32864 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634048731A for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1421291246.7659.1305225827403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <15581131.20741291107311011.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7055) Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7055: ---------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Update of commons logging libraries causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7055 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jingguo Yao > Assignee: Jingguo Yao > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7055.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > Hadoop 0.20.2 uses commons logging 1.0.4. EventCounter works correctly with this version of commons logging. Hadoop 0.21.0 uses commons logging 1.1.1 which causes EventCounter to count logging events incorrectly. I have verified it with Hadoop 0.21.0. After start-up of hadoop, I checked jvmmetrics.log after several minutes. In every metrics record, "logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0" was shown. The following text is an example. > jvm.metrics: hostName=jingguolin, processName=DataNode, sessionId=, gcCount=3, gcTimeMillis=31, logError=0, logFatal=0, logInfo=3, logWarn=0, maxMemoryM=888.9375, memHeapCommittedM=38.0625, memHeapUsedM=3.6539612, memNonHeapCommittedM=18.25, memNonHeapUsedM=11.335686, threadsBlocked=0, threadsNew=0, threadsRunnable=8, threadsTerminated=0, threadsTimedWaiting=6, threadsWaiting=6 > Then I stopped hadoop and replaced commons logging 1.1.1 with 1.0.4. After the re-start of hadoop, a lot of logging events showed up in jvmmetrics.log. > I have checked the source code of Log4JLogger for both 1.0.4 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_0_4/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup) and 1.1.1 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/Log4JLogger.java?view=markup). For 1.0.4, Level instances such as Level.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. But for 1.1.1, Priority instances such as Priority.INFO are used to construct LoggingEvent. So 1.1.1 version's event.getLevel() always returns Priority instances. EventCounter append method's "==" check always fails between a Level instance and a Priority instance. For "logInfo=3" metrics records produced by commons logging 1.1.1., I think that these 3 logging events are produced by log4j code directly instead of through commons logging API. The following code is EventCounter's append method. > public void append(LoggingEvent event) { > Level level = event.getLevel(); > if (level == Level.INFO) { > counts.incr(INFO); > } > else if (level == Level.WARN) { > counts.incr(WARN); > } > else if (level == Level.ERROR) { > counts.incr(ERROR); > } > else if (level == Level.FATAL) { > counts.incr(FATAL); > } > } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14770-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:46:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC8AD5C4C for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34644 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34598 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34589 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901B787415 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <609740634.7669.1305225947587.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6887) Need a separate metrics per garbage collector MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu resolved HADOOP-6887. ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > Need a separate metrics per garbage collector > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6887 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6887 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > In addition to current GC metrics which are the sum of all the collectors, Need separate metrics for monitoring young generation and old generation collections per collector w.r.t collection count and collection time. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14771-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 18:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24A315834 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46070 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46044 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 18:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46036 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 18:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BE38776D for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <255728245.7700.1305226427327.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Robinson updated HADOOP-7276: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14772-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:24:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D16FC5781 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91744 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91708 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91700 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7023B87481 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <400449413.7828.1305228227455.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032601#comment-13032601 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7276: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478844/hadoop-common-arm.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/439//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/439//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/439//console This message is automatically generated. > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14773-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:26:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D988557CB for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93346 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:26:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93316 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93308 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:26:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:26:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:26:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBB9875BB for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <43637156.7837.1305228347716.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032602#comment-13032602 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12478990/HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1071 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1068 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFilterFileSystem +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/440//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/440//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/440//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14774-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:36:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4C185F46 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9489 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:36:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9430 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9422 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:36:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:36:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DAD879D2 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <768915406.7876.1305228947758.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032610#comment-13032610 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-7278: -------------------------------------------- Yup. I think we'll be using an existing slave to drive this deployment not adding a new one. Also, it seems to be a right think to do to chain a number of build to trigger each other e.g.: release build (i.e. the one creating tar balls) triggers deployment, which triggers testing. > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14775-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:52:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB1135681 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28817 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28776 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:52:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A3D87042 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs --------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7284 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Fix For: 0.23.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14776-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:54:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8342E56DC for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33373 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33338 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33330 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F5287123 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1631189769.7924.1305230027418.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032620#comment-13032620 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Currently the shell's trashbin works for default file system that is hdfs and when fully qualified hdfs uri is given. It does not work for for viewfs. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14777-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:56:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62D585778 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37352 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37241 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37232 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D9F87249 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <759471379.7927.1305230147417.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash1.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14778-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:56:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D968E5789 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37557 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37520 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37505 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAE587257 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <452534829.7937.1305230147826.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Oops, sorry about the fix version. I did check the UGI tests locally before committing - sorry I didn't mention this. > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14779-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:56:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 331885798 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37797 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37759 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37743 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54B287258 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1513276976.7938.1305230147870.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032623#comment-13032623 ] Jeffrey Naisbitt commented on HADOOP-7277: ------------------------------------------ We should probably also add .launches to the svn:ignore property. Do you want to do that, Chris? > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14780-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 19:56:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F28657A5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38060 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38028 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 19:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38020 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 19:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E80487250 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1375653163.7931.1305230147580.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14781-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 20:17:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D362E5AE1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75431 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75401 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75393 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 20:17:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:17:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEF487A6A for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2044285181.8001.1305231407499.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <161449362.3682.1305134627390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7277) Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032639#comment-13032639 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7277: --------------------------------------- *nod* Good point. Updated .gitignore file and svn:ignore properties for .launches/ and .externalToolBuilders/ > Add Eclipse launch tasks for the 0.20-security branch > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7277 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7277 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7277-0.20s.patch > > > This is to add the eclipse launchers from HADOOP-5911 to the 0.20 security branch. > Eclipse has a notion of "run configuration", which encapsulates what's needed to run or debug an application. I use this quite a bit to start various Hadoop daemons in debug mode, with breakpoints set, to inspect state and what not. > This is simply configuration, so no tests are provided. After running "ant eclipse" and refreshing your project, you should see entries in the Run Configurations and Debug Configurations for launching the various hadoop daemons from within eclipse. There's a template for testing a specific test, and also templates to run all the tests, the job tracker, and a task tracker. It's likely that some parameters need to be further tweaked to have the same behavior as "ant test", but for most tests, this works. > This also requires a small change to build.xml for the eclipse classpath. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14782-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 20:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4C0E5839 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87564 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87526 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87518 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 20:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83F287ED6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1067180573.8056.1305232007751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032649#comment-13032649 ] Trevor Robinson commented on HADOOP-7276: ----------------------------------------- No tests included because this change just fixes a build failure. Manually verified that x86-64 builds unchanged (-m64 is properly specified) and that ARM now builds (-m32 is not specified). Findbugs issue seems to be a configuration issue unrelated to change. From console output: [exec] findbugs: [exec] [mkdir] Created dir: /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/trunk/build/test/findbugs [exec] [findbugs] Executing findbugs from ant task [exec] [findbugs] Running FindBugs... [exec] [findbugs] The following classes needed for analysis were missing: [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.Doclet [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.DocErrorReporter [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.AnnotationTypeDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.MethodDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.Doc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.PackageDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.LanguageVersion [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.AnnotationDesc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.ConstructorDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.FieldDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.ProgramElementDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.javadoc.ClassDoc [exec] [findbugs] com.sun.tools.doclets.standard.Standard [exec] [findbugs] Warnings generated: 1 [exec] [findbugs] Missing classes: 15 [exec] [findbugs] Calculating exit code... [exec] [findbugs] Setting 'missing class' flag (2) [exec] [findbugs] Setting 'bugs found' flag (1) [exec] [findbugs] Exit code set to: 3 [exec] [findbugs] Classes needed for analysis were missing [exec] [findbugs] Output saved to /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/trunk/build/test/findbugs/hadoop-findbugs-report.xml [exec] [findbugs] Java Result: 3 Also, the precommit build queue (https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/) seems to be hanging multiple recent jobs at "Recording test results". They're still running at >1hr. Would a committer please review the change and let me know if I need to resubmit it? > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14783-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 20:52:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8CC35590 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17090 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17051 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 20:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17042 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 20:52:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6831F87A53 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <672077683.8145.1305233507423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032667#comment-13032667 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479005/trash1.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/441//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/441//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/441//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14784-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 23:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C629753AC for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93955 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:51:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93925 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:51:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93917 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 23:51:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9167C87873 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Refactor FsShell's test ----------------------- Key: HADOOP-7285 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Fix For: 0.23.0 Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14785-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 23:51:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3223453E0 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94422 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94336 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94252 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 23:51:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A427587876 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df ---------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7286 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14786-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 23:59:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A84B56C9 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6684 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6656 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6648 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0A987B52 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991205569.8661.1305244727373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7286.patch refactor and make output a bit more conforming to unix standards > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14787-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 12 23:59:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABF9956D9 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6910 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6855 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6693 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 23:59:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:59:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6D87B54 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <303758445.8663.1305244727429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14788-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 00:31:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48B095D62 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29802 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29773 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29764 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595FC883A5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7287 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: - JVM starts - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14789-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 00:31:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE36E5DA4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30101 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30014 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29988 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 00:31:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:31:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764BA883A8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <342790462.8725.1305246647481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt Here's a test case which illustrates why this problem happens. You can easily reproduce from the command line by trying something like: ./bin/hadoop fs -Ddfs.block.size=4096 -touchz f1 ./bin/hadoop fs -stat "%o" f1 and you'll see that the deprecated option was ignored and there was no warning. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14790-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 00:53:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F20C5F9C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50029 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:53:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50007 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49999 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 00:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA7588A0C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <141792235.8763.1305247967437.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7285.patch > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14791-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 00:53:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCE175FAE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50331 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50282 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 00:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50274 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 00:53:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E3988A0F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <884610506.8766.1305247967598.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14792-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 09:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9CCD4D6C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2945 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2866 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2852 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 09:45:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:45:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:45:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796A28899D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1891354442.9530.1305279887493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] issei yoshida updated HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 Release Note: This patch bring the snappy compression to Hadoop. It requires the snappy v1.0.2 or higher, Because it doesn't use C++ interface but C interface and loads the snappy native library dynamically via dlopen. Its native library is a part of the libhadoop. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14793-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 09:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579A24081 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5963 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5820 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5812 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D5088B41 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <533827770.9611.1305280129065.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032929#comment-13032929 ] issei yoshida commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- Hi all, Thank you for giving permission to relisence regarding hadoop-snappy. I created the patch that add the snappy compression support to the trunk of the Hadoop SVN repository. Its native library is a part of the libhadoop and it requires the snappy v1.0.2 or higher. (Because it doesn't use C++ interface but C interface and load the snappy native library dynamically via dlopen.) I would like to hear your advice. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14794-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 09:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 888A1408A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6098 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6048 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5974 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 09:49:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A35C88B40 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1075115204.9610.1305280129038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] issei yoshida updated HADOOP-7206: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7206.patch > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14795-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 10:56:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DE7B496C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32227 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32201 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32193 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 10:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1B0887FB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1459321175.9835.1305284147566.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032959#comment-13032959 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7285: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479046/HADOOP-7285.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/443//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/443//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/443//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14796-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 10:56:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 416C24986 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32685 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32632 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32537 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 10:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72975887F4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1568643670.9832.1305284147466.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032958#comment-13032958 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7286: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479039/HADOOP-7286.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 3 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/442//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/442//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/442//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14797-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 10:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6419C4A20 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37305 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37269 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 10:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37261 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 10:58:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:58:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5256588954 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1622700926.9885.1305284269333.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032961#comment-13032961 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479073/HADOOP-7206.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.TestCodec +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/444//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/444//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/444//console This message is automatically generated. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14798-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 11:00:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A72E34D12 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38196 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:00:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38166 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38158 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 11:00:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:00:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:00:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215C889DC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <618841109.9890.1305284387725.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14799-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 11:02:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFD614732 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40075 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:02:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40046 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:02:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40038 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 11:02:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0C288A86 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1440211408.9898.1305284507824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14800-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 11:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2615B4777 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40419 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40306 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40298 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 11:02:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9C788A80 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1819460217.9895.1305284507650.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff FIxed broken unit test that I missed in the first round of the patch. Fixed unchecked cast. Seems the Jets3t library isn't returning a typed collection as it's docs suggest. Working around this is more costly due to the iteration and type-checking required - is this the right way to solve this issue, or would @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") have been better? > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14801-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 11:25:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86F3F4C47 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79108 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:25:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79069 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 11:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79061 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 11:25:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:25:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:25:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9F6881FA for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991263251.9922.1305285887375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032969#comment-13032969 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479088/HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1070 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1068 warnings). -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/445//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/445//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/445//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14802-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 12:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AEAE4E18 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86425 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 12:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86397 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 12:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86389 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 12:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28C488464 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 12:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <391702362.10038.1305291287989.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033012#comment-13033012 ] Nicholas Telford commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------------ RE: QA analysis - The findbugs issue is about FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing, which my patch hasn't affected at all. Since it's abstract and I can't find anything that uses it, I think that's another issue altogether. The 2 additional compiler warnings - I can't find them anywhere. If anyone can suggest an effective way to locate these, I'm all ears. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14803-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 14:28:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E890481C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67240 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67183 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67146 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 14:28:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:28:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4E088D96 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1115617041.10194.1305296867305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7288) FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7288 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7288 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Reporter: Nicholas Telford Assignee: Nicholas Telford Priority: Minor The inner class o.a.h.fs.FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing is causing the QA bot to fail all patches due to a findbugs issue (the inner class should be static). It's an abstract class that is not currently used. It looks as though it's old code that simply needs removing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14804-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 14:30:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A843B4A4A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70772 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:30:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70708 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 14:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70700 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 14:30:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:30:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:30:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D93D88EC3 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 14:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <461660761.10200.1305296987445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1115617041.10194.1305296867305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7288) FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7288: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7288-remove-redundant-class-001.patch Patch to remove o.a.h.fs.FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing class. > FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7288 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7288-remove-redundant-class-001.patch > > > The inner class o.a.h.fs.FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing is causing the QA bot to fail all patches due to a findbugs issue (the inner class should be static). > It's an abstract class that is not currently used. It looks as though it's old code that simply needs removing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14805-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 15:55:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7FAD40B8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69093 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 15:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69062 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 15:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69054 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 15:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9193489355 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 15:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1906313121.10395.1305302087592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7285-2.patch (Mishap caused by forgetting to mvn-install before running hdfs tests...) Don't throw FNF exception, just display the error, so correct exit code is returned and the tests in HDFS-1933 will pass. Also removed unrelated and unused DelayedExceptionThrowing that is causing a findbugs warning. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14806-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 16:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA1B24CAF for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98690 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:15:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98633 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:15:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98625 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 16:15:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:15:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:15:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF3789BCC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <326185698.10458.1305303287704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033106#comment-13033106 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7285: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479132/HADOOP-7285-2.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/446//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/446//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/446//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14807-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 16:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3207B44E1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42580 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42551 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42527 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0089589851 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1437065322.10561.1305305447998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7286-2.patch Fix findbug warning by changing String concat to StringBuilder. Also removed unrelated and unused method that is generating another findbug warning. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14808-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 16:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3688744EF for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42605 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42554 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42528 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 16:51:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDDC89850 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1861357253.10560.1305305447970.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.22.0 +1 lgtm > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14809-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:05:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A10EB4CFE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66528 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:05:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66500 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66492 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:05:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:05:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:05:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C6589DCC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1250250131.10611.1305306287417.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033131#comment-13033131 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7286: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479137/HADOOP-7286-2.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestSinkQueue +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/447//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/447//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/447//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14810-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:11:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ECEC4E68 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83881 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:11:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83847 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:11:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83839 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:11:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:11:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:11:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7013389FAC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <417543205.10626.1305306647455.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033134#comment-13033134 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7286: ------------------------------------- Metrics test failure is unrelated to this patch. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14811-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:21:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92DA84654 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92721 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:21:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92664 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:21:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92651 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:21:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:21:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:21:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D3E89345 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1737110561.10648.1305307247430.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033139#comment-13033139 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7285: ---------------------------------------- +1. Patch looks good, Daryn. One question: why is the {{flag}} instance variable in {{o.a.h.fs.shell.Test}} protected, instead of private? > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14812-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:48:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB006458E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37029 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36982 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36974 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:48:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:48:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A030589DA2 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <655456119.10714.1305308867652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033154#comment-13033154 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7285: ------------------------------------- Good question. I suppose there is no reason. Shall I change it? > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14813-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D4F44617 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43366 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43324 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43316 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7050389EA9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <928396328.10721.1305308987456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033157#comment-13033157 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7285: ---------------------------------------- Yup. Might as well be private if you don't intend {{Test}} to be subclassed. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14814-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 17:56:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E185E4723 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49623 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49585 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 17:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49577 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 17:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB6E890C9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 17:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1232777387.10732.1305309347630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7285-3.patch Change "flag" from protected to private as requested. Thanks, Aaron! > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14815-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:19:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F8BB48DC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73348 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73275 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73246 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:14:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6C989709 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1450159383.10798.1305310428575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033170#comment-13033170 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7285: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479147/HADOOP-7285-3.patch against trunk revision 1102123. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/448//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/448//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/448//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14816-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF984C5E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6421 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6399 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6391 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C2F89D1E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2108583256.10817.1305310907925.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk and branch 22. Thanks Nigel! Tested via ant tar and ant package instead of Hudson since most of the change was done via svn remove (the patch only applies to build.xml). > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14817-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 388F14C6A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6598 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6552 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6448 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0325589D21 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1127283378.10820.1305310908009.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <227442675.12305.1297477797626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7138) Remove contrib build and test support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-7138. --------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate This change is covered by the change in HADOOP-7137. > Remove contrib build and test support > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > With the removal of hod and failmon, these files are no longer needed: > src/contrib/test/* > src/contrib/build.xml > src/contrib/build-contrib.xml > In addition, the contrib support in the top level build.xml should be removed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14818-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:22:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69BC84CBD for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9436 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9370 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9362 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:22:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:47 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A13989D24 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <83312554.10823.1305310908103.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <227442675.12305.1297477797626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7138) Remove contrib build and test support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins closed HADOOP-7138. ------------------------------- > Remove contrib build and test support > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7138 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7138 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > With the removal of hod and failmon, these files are no longer needed: > src/contrib/test/* > src/contrib/build.xml > src/contrib/build-contrib.xml > In addition, the contrib support in the top level build.xml should be removed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14819-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:24:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A7F4CF1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10671 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10646 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10638 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:24:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:24:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AE689DF7 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1780544293.10827.1305311027417.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033176#comment-13033176 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7286: ---------------------------------------- Patch looks pretty solid, Daryn. A few comments: # I think the name "{{Capacity}}" isn't the best. At least in the case of, "{{du}}" and "{{dus}}", there's no capacity information being calculated - just usage info. I suggest renaming to something like "{{FsUsage}}". Thoughts? # Since all sub-classes of {{o.a.h.fs.shell.Capacity}} need a {{TableBuilder}} object, might as well make this a protected instance variable of {{Capacity}} a la {{humanReadable}}. # I've always found it silly that we continue to maintain both "{{du}}" and "{{dus}}". Perhaps now would be a good time to deprecate "{{dus}}" in favor of "{{du -s}}" ? Feel free to say this should be done as part of a separate JIRA. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14820-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C22224058 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18863 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18768 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18760 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:30:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7CB89FF7 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1327799579.10843.1305311387641.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033182#comment-13033182 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7286: ------------------------------------- All good ideas! I too dislike all the commands like du/dus that are just permutations of each other, and would love to get rid of them. How do you propose "dus" is deprecated? Writing something to stderr? Or just get rid of it? I'd favor the latter unless there are objections. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14821-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:48:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F69E4909 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54346 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54305 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:48:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54295 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:48:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:48:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:48:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562C1897D7 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <758789398.10913.1305312467349.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033199#comment-13033199 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7285: ------------------------------------- +1, looks good to me. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14822-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA2CF4D60 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57026 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56990 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56982 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35258990A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1262953664.10926.1305312587664.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks, Daryn! Have we been considering these changes to be incompatible changes, since they change the error output? > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14823-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 658404E89 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62925 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62868 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62653 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:54:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ECA89B43 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1809166531.10948.1305312827733.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033208#comment-13033208 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7286: ------------------------------------- I think we need to leave "dus" for at least one stable version. IMO it should print something like: WARNING: The "dus" command has been deprecated. Please use "du -s" instead. <-- on stderr 12345 file:/foo <-- on stdout > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14824-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:54:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0736C4EAE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64455 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64418 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64376 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E49889B39 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ivy: test conf should not extend common conf -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7289 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14825-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:56:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89D544F25 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69338 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69313 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69305 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D71C89C5A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <970560271.10954.1305312947445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c7289_20110513.patch > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14826-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:56:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D05534F3B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69732 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69668 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69496 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7695D89C5B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2068175732.10955.1305312947482.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033211#comment-13033211 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------------ c7289_20110513.patch: removed the extension and changed mockito to use test conf. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14827-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 18:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFCD1401A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74173 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74146 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 18:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74117 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 18:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED9889D4B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1395249415.10960.1305313067515.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14828-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:00:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0E244332 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79497 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79441 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79433 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:00:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:00:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:00:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D23389E26 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2002540982.10966.1305313187574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7278: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7278.patch The patch adds a set of simple configs sufficient to run a 0.22 cluster on a few nodes. Another part of the patch is a deployment script to be driven by a Hudson job. This setup works [here|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-cluster-deploy/]. Once a cluster is deployed a set of workloads will be executed to check the [viability of the cluster|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-cluster-test/]. This is not a part of common source tree strictly speaking. Would it be better to have a separate build_and_deploy repository at the same level of Hadoop component are checked-in into SVN? Thoughts? > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7278.patch > > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14829-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:10:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C552E48BC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 798 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:10:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 770 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:10:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 762 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:10:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:10:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3535891E3 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <147831449.11007.1305313787665.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <88464990.3250.1305126467497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7274) CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-7274: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.20.205.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 I committed this. Thanks, Jon! > CLONE - IOUtils.readFully and IOUtils.skipFully have typo in exception creation's message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7274 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7274 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 > Reporter: Jonathan Eagles > Assignee: Jonathan Eagles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.205.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7274-0.20-security.patch > > > Same fix as for HADOOP-7057 for the Hadoop security branch > {noformat} > throw new IOException( "Premeture EOF from inputStream"); > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14830-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6446B4996 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7856 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7781 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7766 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A251789371 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1946818191.11013.1305314027661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033224#comment-13033224 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7289: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479154/c7289_20110513.patch against trunk revision 1102861. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.http.TestGlobalFilter org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerLifecycle org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerWebapps org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServer org.apache.hadoop.http.TestServletFilter org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestAvroRpc org.apache.hadoop.log.TestLogLevel -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/449//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/449//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/449//console This message is automatically generated. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14831-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:36:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E274C475D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37802 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37775 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37766 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:36:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9160D89B69 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <124474506.11064.1305315347592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033238#comment-13033238 ] Eric Yang commented on HADOOP-7289: ----------------------------------- +1 looks good. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14832-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:40:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD0F24979 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46285 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:40:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46229 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:40:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45984 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:40:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:40:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:40:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E0689CD6 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7290 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: test Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) Reporter: Trevor Robinson Priority: Minor Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec ------------- Standard Output --------------- trobinson:users guest git ------------- ---------------- --------------- Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec FAILED expected: but was: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14833-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:50:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11D334FCE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57957 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57903 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57889 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3C289022 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <592767074.11075.1305316187501.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Robinson updated HADOOP-7290: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14834-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 19:50:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CC884FDB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57970 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57906 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57888 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 19:50:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675E389020 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1724631275.11073.1305316187420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Robinson updated HADOOP-7290: ------------------------------------ Attachment: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch Patch puts `id` output in LinkedHashSet instead of ArrayList, then tests against getGroupNames() for size and containment of all values, rather than comparing corresponding array elements. > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14835-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:04:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 223224738 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75464 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75417 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:04:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75328 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:04:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:04:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:04:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E5589471 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1666903543.11117.1305317027614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033252#comment-13033252 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7290: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479160/TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch against trunk revision 1102861. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/450//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/450//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/450//console This message is automatically generated. > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14836-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:18:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8705492B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96600 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:18:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96570 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:18:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96562 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:18:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:18:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:18:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682068997B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1556508098.11151.1305317867423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033257#comment-13033257 ] Trevor Robinson commented on HADOOP-7290: ----------------------------------------- Contrib tests unchanged. Trunk/PreCommit configuration broken by revision 1102848? [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Running contrib tests. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] [exec] [exec] /bin/kill -9 12446 [exec] kill: No such process [exec] /homes/hudson/tools/ant/latest/bin/ant -Dversion=1102861_HADOOP-7290_PATCH-12479160 -Declipse.home=/homes/hudson/tools/eclipse/latest -Dpython.home=/homes/hudson/tools/python/latest -DHadoopPatchProcess= -Dtest.junit.output.format=xml -Dtest.output=no test-contrib [exec] Buildfile: build.xml [exec] [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] Target "test-contrib" does not exist in the project "Hadoop-Common". [exec] [exec] Total time: 0 seconds > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14837-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:20:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94182417D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97545 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97518 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97509 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A51C899FC for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1648895671.11166.1305317987366.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033259#comment-13033259 ] Trevor Robinson commented on HADOOP-7137: ----------------------------------------- This commit removed test-contrib which is run by Hudson in PreCommit-HADOOP-Build: [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Running contrib tests. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] [exec] [exec] /bin/kill -9 12446 [exec] kill: No such process [exec] /homes/hudson/tools/ant/latest/bin/ant -Dversion=1102861_HADOOP-7290_PATCH-12479160 -Declipse.home=/homes/hudson/tools/eclipse/latest -Dpython.home=/homes/hudson/tools/python/latest -DHadoopPatchProcess= -Dtest.junit.output.format=xml -Dtest.output=no test-contrib [exec] Buildfile: build.xml [exec] [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] Target "test-contrib" does not exist in the project "Hadoop-Common". [exec] [exec] Total time: 0 seconds > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14838-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B6A84B25 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22322 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22256 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22240 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA6C890F3 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7291 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Eli Collins The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14839-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ECE04B50 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22613 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22556 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22371 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:40:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFDA890F8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <558693112.11211.1305319187500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033268#comment-13033268 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7290: ------------------------------------- +1 lgtm On my system the ordering happens to line up, but you're right, there's no reason it should and it looks like it doesn't on your system. The Hudson error is HADOOP-7291. > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14840-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E45E4C37 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30845 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30798 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30542 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41758932F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Trevor Robinson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2137725310.11224.1305319427668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Robinson updated HADOOP-7290: ------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: test) security > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14841-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6245B4C50 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32439 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32406 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32398 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66E28933B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <887589582.11232.1305319427940.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins reassigned HADOOP-7290: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14842-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 20:46:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F176E4870 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35949 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35914 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 20:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35828 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 20:46:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:46:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726808944F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1450426724.11236.1305319547465.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7290: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks Trevor! > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14843-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:00:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48F07478D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56128 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56045 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56027 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:00:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E689F89A71 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1236379130.11304.1305320392940.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033283#comment-13033283 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- I've disabled further precommit builds until we fix this. I had partial change in my workspace for this very issue which I why I wasn't yet committing 7137. Sorry, should have noted that. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14844-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:00:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3034747AE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56572 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56523 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56515 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:00:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B91089A83 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1257258633.11321.1305320393502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John George updated HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14845-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:00:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC0AD496A for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57547 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57501 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:00:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57493 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:00:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:00:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5D289A85 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:59:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1521966324.11323.1305320393567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033286#comment-13033286 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------- Looks like those http test case failures might be related to this patch? > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14846-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:08:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8664B4E43 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80431 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:08:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80403 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80391 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:08:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:08:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:08:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC389E12 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1683786290.11386.1305320867352.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033293#comment-13033293 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Apologies for missing this, I assumed test-contrib was being called by Hudson only via the dependency on the test target. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14847-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 918D34F7E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89460 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89428 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89420 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:12:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1C989F95 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <928094290.11414.1305321107382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033298#comment-13033298 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Btw Nigel, if you can point me to the Hudson login I'm happy to update the job command. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14848-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:16:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5322456C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96186 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96150 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96142 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:16:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FB289136 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <573823175.11447.1305321347615.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033303#comment-13033303 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- No, test-contrib is called directly in src/test/bin/test-patch.sh I'll upload an untested patch in a sec. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14849-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 674024F43 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2199 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2171 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2163 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1897389242 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:17:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1578264414.11468.1305321468096.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c7289_20110513b.patch The failed tests require slf4j. c7289_20110513b.patch: fixed also slf4j and junit. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14850-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:20:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95E8746E5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3424 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3388 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3380 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6989989310 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2024491831.11473.1305321587428.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7291.patch This patch includes removing Python dependency since HOD is gone. It also conditionally run test-contrib if the project has a test-contrib target in build.xml Remember that the test-patch.sh script is pulled from common into hdfs and mapreduce using svn:externals > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14851-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:27:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A023D4847 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16586 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16562 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16554 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:27:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:27:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:27:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F5889557 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1237237551.11495.1305322007471.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033310#comment-13033310 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Ah. +1 patch lgtm > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14852-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 059D940C4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41249 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:43:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41212 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41204 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:43:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:43:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:43:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588B989BE9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1227711425.11580.1305322967359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033323#comment-13033323 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- This opens up scope creep that makes me a little bit nervous. If we add the ability to set metadata in create(), then we probably also need the ability to query metadata, modify metadata on existing files, etc, which is all of a sudden a lot of code. There's a trade-off between least-common-denominator APIs (sucks for everyone) vs support-all-FS-features (sucks for compatibility). I think this might be going too far towards the latter. Would it make sense to add these functions directly to the S3 filesystems but not to the overall API? Then if a user really needs to code specifically against S3, they can down-cast to S3FS and do what they like. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14853-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:51:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 819324749 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48438 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48405 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48397 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DAB89E9D for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1500579287.11603.1305323447594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1117) DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033328#comment-13033328 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-1117: ------------------------------------------------ Why not wait for Hudson/Jenkins? > DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > Attachments: CpuPendingTransfer3.patch > > > When the namenode is restarted, the datanodes register and each block is inserted into neededReplication. When the namenode exists, safemode it sees starts processing neededReplication. It picks up a block from neededReplication, sees that it has already has the required number of replicas, and continues to the next block in neededReplication. The blocks remain in neededReplication permanentlyhe namenode worker thread to scans this huge list of blocks once every 3 seconds. This consumes plenty of CPU on the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14854-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 21:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED8B14778 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49382 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49342 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49334 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7FE89FA9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <966467803.11611.1305323567387.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1117) DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033330#comment-13033330 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-1117: ------------------------------------------------ Sorry, wrong issue. > DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > Attachments: CpuPendingTransfer3.patch > > > When the namenode is restarted, the datanodes register and each block is inserted into neededReplication. When the namenode exists, safemode it sees starts processing neededReplication. It picks up a block from neededReplication, sees that it has already has the required number of replicas, and continues to the next block in neededReplication. The blocks remain in neededReplication permanentlyhe namenode worker thread to scans this huge list of blocks once every 3 seconds. This consumes plenty of CPU on the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14855-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:01:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A274D4FD8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56053 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56028 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56020 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:01:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:01:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:01:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CFD891CE for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <20192042.11634.1305324047356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033333#comment-13033333 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7289: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479171/c7289_20110513b.patch against trunk revision 1102893. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.impl.TestSinkQueue -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/453//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/453//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/453//console This message is automatically generated. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14856-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3561140F8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68072 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68029 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:15:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67910 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:15:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:15:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:15:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2240895FB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2021018182.11663.1305324887857.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033341#comment-13033341 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6728: ------------------------------------------------ {{metrics2.impl.TestSinkQueue}} is failing, see [build #453|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/453//testReport/], [build #447|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/447//testReport/], etc. > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. > [The current design wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2]. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14857-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3811C495E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70907 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70881 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:17:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70861 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:17:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:17:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C2189740 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430838266.11712.1305325007872.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033344#comment-13033344 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7137: ------------------------------------------------ Why not wait for Hudson/Jenkins? > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14858-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:21:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 201F646AB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76886 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76813 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76742 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:21:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:21:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEAC898BA for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <314553038.11731.1305325247500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John George updated HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7282-1.patch > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14859-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:25:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2370F48B4 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83073 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:25:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83043 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83035 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:25:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1A589AF5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2012368330.11758.1305325487582.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John George updated HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14860-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:25:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDAF748DB for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84587 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84547 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84538 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:25:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7560189AF1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "John George (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1117299334.11754.1305325487477.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033352#comment-13033352 ] John George commented on HADOOP-7282: ------------------------------------- Ran manual tests to verify that ip address gets printed out correctly even when client exits without completing an rpc. Also ran tests to verify that ip gets printed in normal use cases. No tests attached since it seemed extremely difficult to add tests for the above use-cases. Results of test-patch. findbugs not because of this patch. [exec] [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. [exec] [exec] ~ > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14861-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:43:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98A25417B for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10192 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:43:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10142 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10130 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:43:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:43:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:43:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6136489FFD for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2120237073.11802.1305326567394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1115617041.10194.1305296867305.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7288) FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-7288. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed This was fixed in HADOOP-7285. > FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing generates QA errors > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7288 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7288-remove-redundant-class-001.patch > > > The inner class o.a.h.fs.FsShell.DelayedExceptionThrowing is causing the QA bot to fail all patches due to a findbugs issue (the inner class should be static). > It's an abstract class that is not currently used. It looks as though it's old code that simply needs removing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14862-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 338BF48D0 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23648 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23609 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23601 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A5E892A6 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1279635768.11870.1305327167875.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Assignee: Nigel Daley Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I've committed this to trunk and branch 22. Thanks Nigel! > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14863-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:55:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CEA24915 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26071 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26035 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26026 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708BC89387 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1072820164.11873.1305327287457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14864-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A4264931 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26365 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26290 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26268 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6C289393 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1104332365.11882.1305327287702.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HADOOP-7291. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14865-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A316492F for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26368 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26314 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26271 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F79E89391 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1895244652.11880.1305327287649.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033370#comment-13033370 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7137: ------------------------------------- I should have. I didn't because most of the change is done via svn remove instead of applying the patch, so I ran the full tarball build, but waiting for Hudson would have caught HADOOP-7291 (the required change to test-patch.sh). > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14866-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 22:59:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8BD449D5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31143 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30985 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 22:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30977 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 22:59:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:59:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:59:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C065B894A1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 22:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 22:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <450658595.11896.1305327527784.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033373#comment-13033373 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention, please enable precommit builds when you get a chance. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14867-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 23:33:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2CA14B9E for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57636 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:33:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57598 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:33:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57590 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 23:33:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:33:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9176589CA1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy ------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7292 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: metrics Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14868-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 23:37:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CD234F82 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59659 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:37:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59625 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:37:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59617 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 23:37:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:37:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:37:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FB289D68 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1437948146.11960.1305329807463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033384#comment-13033384 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6728: --------------------------------- bq. metrics2.impl.TestSinkQueue is failing, see build #453, build #447, etc. I knew the test is racy (relying on Thread.yield) but it never failed on me until the pre-commit builds for HADOOP-7289 patches. Opened HADOOP-7292 to track the test fix. > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6728-y20.104.patch, metrics1-flow.png, metrics2-builder-r2.png, metrics2-builder.png, metrics2-flow.png, metrics2-mutable-r2.png, metrics2-mutable.png, metrics2-record-r2.png, metrics2-record.png, metrics2-uml-r2.png, metrics2-uml.png > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. > [The current design wiki|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2]. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14869-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 23:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFA574669 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70195 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70165 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70097 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19543890D5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <144810310.12034.1305330648100.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: mvn-layout.sh hadoop-commons-maven.patch I spent a few hours playing with hadoop-common mavenization following the ideas in the JIRA. I've got it to a point that compiles java and native code, runs the tests (with native code if present) and generates the JAR. I've only had to modify 1 java file, one testcase that had 'build/classes' hardcoded to look for a properties file. I've had to move directories/files around to follow Maven dir layout. Still to be done is javadocs, documentation, packaging (that would be an assembly descriptor), wiring jdiff/clover/findbugs, and deployment configuration of artifacts (JARs/SOs). The end goal will be to generate a TARBALL identical to the one it is being generated today. I don't expect all that to be much work. Once hadoop-commons is done, the same could be done in hadoop-hdfs and hadoop-mapreduce. Also the contrib/ stuff could go into its own Maven module. Finally a root Maven project could be used to wire all the above projects and external dependencies versions would be defined there in a dependencyManagement section. The good thing is that it is not required to do all at once, we can do common, then hdfs, then mapreduce and finally contrib. Attached you'll find a script that moves dir/files around to the maven expected locations and a patch containing the Maven pom.xml file, a native-build.xml (Ant file invoked from maven to build native code) and the 1 line change to a testcase. Instructions to test it: * checkout hadoop-common trunk * run the attached script from hadoop-common root dir * apply the the patch * Use Maven 3 to to build/test ** -Dcompile.native enables native compilation IMPORTANT: I couldn't figure this out yet but there is some issue with javah when invoked from Maven/Ant (javah is not being found in LINUX because Maven changes JAVA_HOME to JRE location). TEMPORARY WORKAROUND: softlink JDK/lib/tools.jar in JRE/lib/ext/ Before I continue working on this I want to know if folks would be OK with moving forward with this patch. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14870-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 13 23:51:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91F494675 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70489 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70448 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2011 23:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70439 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2011 23:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545C0890DF for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <238554549.12043.1305330648342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7289.patch Modified Test classpath ordering to include common third party jars first. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14871-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 00:20:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1816645AA for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85375 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85319 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85217 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 00:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920AB897B4 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <228261537.12089.1305332387594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033396#comment-13033396 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7289: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479191/HADOOP-7289.patch against trunk revision 1102914. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/454//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/454//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/454//console This message is automatically generated. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Attachments: HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14872-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 00:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3D4B47AD for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94301 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94269 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94261 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 00:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962C7899C7 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <888248017.12100.1305333107612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033398#comment-13033398 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------------------ In [build #454|https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/454/console], there is a build failed. {noformat} [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/trunk/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh: line 527: -c: command not found [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Running contrib tests. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] [exec] [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/trunk/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh: line 533: auxwww: command not found [exec] /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/trunk/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh: line 533: HadoopPatchProcess: command not found [exec] /homes/hudson/tools/ant/latest/bin/ant -Dversion= -DHadoopPatchProcess= -Dtest.junit.output.format=xml -Dtest.output=no test-contrib [exec] Buildfile: build.xml [exec] [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] Target "test-contrib" does not exist in the project "Hadoop-Common". [exec] [exec] Total time: 0 seconds {noformat} > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14873-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 00:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01ECA4484 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7135 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7067 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6780 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8071689E99 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <384190727.12136.1305334667522.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins reopened HADOOP-7291: --------------------------------- Assignee: Eli Collins (was: Nigel Daley) > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14874-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 00:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 361CE4499 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7254 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7197 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7054 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 00:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F1A89E9E for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 00:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1336413197.12140.1305334667672.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7291-2.patch Patch attached. Since there's no test-contrib target we can just remove it entirely. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14875-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 01:04:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E807F4A74 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11869 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:04:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11823 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:04:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11815 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 01:04:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:04:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:04:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916DC89F7F for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <250584371.12171.1305335027592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Eric Yang (was: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE) Eric, if test extends master, then it won't download the jars. Assigning it to you. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14876-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 01:06:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 212974B00 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13085 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13042 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13034 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 01:06:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D8A89FF5 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 01:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <148439027.12175.1305335147803.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7289-1.patch Patch for extends test from master. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7289-1.patch, HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14877-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 01:26:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDC1F41A5 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19656 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:26:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19615 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19607 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 01:26:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:26:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:26:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7C18737D for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 01:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1369502559.12203.1305336347387.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033412#comment-13033412 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7289: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479199/HADOOP-7289-1.patch against trunk revision 1102914. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/455//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/455//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/455//console This message is automatically generated. > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Attachments: HADOOP-7289-1.patch, HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14878-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 01:34:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE72147D4 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26702 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26664 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26656 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 01:34:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:34:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:34:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9252287658 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1041215924.12221.1305336827596.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7289: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 patch looks good. I have committed this. Thanks, Eric! > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7289-1.patch, HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14879-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 01:38:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4F97482E for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28033 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28009 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 01:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28001 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 01:38:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5AF87724 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 01:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <97425691.12233.1305337067440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033418#comment-13033418 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Eli, test-patch is also used in HDFS and MapReduce. So, we cannot remove test-contrib. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14880-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 03:10:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBE246089 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 03:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55835 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 03:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55729 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 03:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55704 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 03:10:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 03:10:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 03:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12C888669 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 03:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 03:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1819611828.12304.1305342587918.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033430#comment-13033430 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Right, looking at the log more closely ("-c: command not found") it looks like GREP is not defined. How is test-patch being called? > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14881-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:19:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 817CC66FF for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84572 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84537 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84519 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD15B241A for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1468116416.12387.1305346728372.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14883-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:19:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EA266728 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84804 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84747 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84480 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34613B2417 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <338849823.12384.1305346728211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033442#comment-13033442 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- Looks like this patch gets rid of the check against trash.isEnabled() -- is that intentional? Also, it seems this should be straight-forward to unit test. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14882-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:19:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A8E86725 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84812 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84540 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84484 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:19:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B836BB2420 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:18:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1585977980.12393.1305346728743.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7178) copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7178: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Canceling patch available status for discussion. > copyToLocal API is creating .crc files in local, even after setting verifyChecksum to false at client side. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7178 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7178 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7178_COMMON.patch, HADOOP-7178_HDFS.patch > > > When we copy the files from DFS to local, it is creating the .crc file in local filesystem for the verification of checksum even if we disable the checksum verification at client side. > When user does not want to do any checksum verification, then what will be the use in creating of these files in local file system. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14884-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 870946181 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90236 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89978 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89967 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:31:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:31:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6DFB266B for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <903096075.12433.1305347447387.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6541) An Interactive Hadoop FS shell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6541: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > An Interactive Hadoop FS shell > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: HADOOP-6541.2.patch, HADOOP-6541.3.patch, HADOOP-6541.4.patch, HADOOP-6541.5.patch, HADOOP-6541.6.patch, HADOOP-6541.patch > > > A shell that allows the user to execute multiple filesystem operations in a single JVM instance at a prompt. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14885-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:33:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 910A66AB4 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92545 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:33:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92472 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92461 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:33:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:33:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:33:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CC4B26DB for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1170809196.12454.1305347567401.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033451#comment-13033451 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7192: ------------------------------------- +1 > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.1, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14886-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:35:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC2D96F7D for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93359 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:35:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93308 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93285 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:35:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:35:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC1DB2756 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1893140767.12464.1305347687642.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) (was: 0.21.1) (was: 0.20.3) 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 0.22 and trunk. Thanks, Harsh! (p.s the chinese docs aren't a big deal -- they're known to be out of date) > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14887-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 04:39:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 072E16FA5 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94044 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94013 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 04:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94005 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 04:39:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:39:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1C9B2808 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 04:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <27115803.12474.1305347927386.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6880) Documentation: Chinese (cn) doc is old MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6880?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 33454#comment-13033454 ]=20 Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6880: ------------------------------------- Best I can tell, the Chinese docs haven't been maintained since they were i= nitially contributed in 2008 (HADOOP-4164). I would like to propose that we remove them entirely, or add (in Chinese) a= big red warning message on the page indicating as much and asking for help= translating? What do folks think? > Documentation: Chinese (cn) doc is old > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6880 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6880 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: huang jian > > Documentation: Chinese (cn) doc is old. > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/quickstart.html > JavaTM 1.6.x, preferably from Sun, must be installed.=20 > Configuration > Use the following: > conf/core-site.xml: > > > fs.default.name > hdfs://localhost:9000 > > > conf/hdfs-site.xml: > > > dfs.replication > 1 > > > conf/mapred-site.xml: > > > mapred.job.tracker > localhost:9001 > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/cn/quickstart.html > JavaTM1.5.x=EF=BC=8C=E5=BF=85=E9=A1=BB=E5=AE=89=E8=A3=85=EF=BC=8C=E5=BB= =BA=E8=AE=AE=E9=80=89=E6=8B=A9Sun=E5=85=AC=E5=8F=B8=E5=8F=91=E8=A1=8C=E7=9A= =84Java=E7=89=88=E6=9C=AC=E3=80=82=20 > =E9=85=8D=E7=BD=AE > =E4=BD=BF=E7=94=A8=E5=A6=82=E4=B8=8B=E7=9A=84 conf/hadoop-site.xml: > > > fs.default.name > localhost:9000 > > > mapred.job.tracker > localhost:9001 > > > dfs.replication > 1 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14888-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 05:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FC226B9B for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8618 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 05:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8491 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 05:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8478 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 05:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FD2B2CDC for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <731753847.12510.1305350088266.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033459#comment-13033459 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6105: ------------------------------------- It seems there is a bit of a flaw in the way this JIRA was done. Could those who are still watching this please take a look at HADOOP-7287? Thanks. > Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6105 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6105-1.patch, HADOOP-6105-10.patch, HADOOP-6105-2.patch, HADOOP-6105-3.patch, HADOOP-6105-4.patch, HADOOP-6105-5.patch, HADOOP-6105-6.patch, HADOOP-6105-7.patch, HADOOP-6105-8.patch, HADOOP-6105-9.patch, HADOOP-6105.patch, HADOOP-6105.patch > > > There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc. > In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14889-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 10:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF38F623E for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47274 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 10:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47238 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 10:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47230 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 10:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24E5C309D for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 10:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1992215505.12772.1305369827726.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033499#comment-13033499 ] Nicholas Telford commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------------ That was actually my initial idea, but thought that it'd stand a better chance of being accepted if it was more abstract. I see your point though, it's part of the reason I felt so uneasy about the implementation. Thanks for the review, I'll refactor the patch for S3 only on Monday. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14890-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:18:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB6B6C45 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57138 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57082 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57074 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:18:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:18:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEE4B2E6A for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1952849314.12953.1305379067774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033526#comment-13033526 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch #51 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch/51/]) HADOOP-7291. svn merge -c 1102914 from trunk > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14891-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 242506A88 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78621 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78591 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78583 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DD3CA12C for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <539064270.12992.1305379788868.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033532#comment-13033532 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7137. Remove hod contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14892-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF1026AB7 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78905 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78870 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78849 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CBECA11E for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <849762187.12978.1305379788024.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033529#comment-13033529 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14893-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40DDD6ACE for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78987 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78924 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78855 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9FCA11F for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1186824359.12979.1305379788061.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033530#comment-13033530 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7192. Update fs -stat docs to reflect the format features. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria. > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14895-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E66E6AEE for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79296 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79230 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79103 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1061CA125 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2063726183.12985.1305379788656.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033531#comment-13033531 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7285. Refactor the test command to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14894-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B6716AD6 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79049 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78952 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78856 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C33CA11A for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <457763966.12974.1305379787859.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033528#comment-13033528 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7290: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7290. Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups. Contributed by Trevor Robison > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14896-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 13:30:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02BC76C74 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79990 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79893 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 13:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79884 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 13:30:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:48 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2214CA12E for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1595173543.12994.1305379788923.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033533#comment-13033533 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7289: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #688 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/688/]) HADOOP-7289. In ivy.xml, test conf should not extend common conf. Contributed by Eric Yang > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7289-1.patch, HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14897-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 15:39:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A4DB6107 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85618 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 15:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85548 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 15:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85472 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 15:39:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48404CA51F for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <244519365.13108.1305387528292.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033552#comment-13033552 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #679 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/679/]) HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14898-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 15:39:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E96B161C7 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87933 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 15:39:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87868 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 15:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87763 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 15:39:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53E6CA588 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 15:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:38:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1206193044.13208.1305387531935.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033562#comment-13033562 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #679 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/679/]) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14899-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 14 23:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E8856382 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 23:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27046 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 23:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27008 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2011 23:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27000 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2011 23:49:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 23:49:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 May 2011 23:49:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579FBCA7E7 for ; Sat, 14 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1957536738.13486.1305416927355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1117) DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033619#comment-13033619 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-1117: ------------------------------------- Doesn't this break the rack policy? We should only remove a block from neededReplications when it has sufficient replicas both in terms of replica count and rack count. {noformat} + if (numCurrentReplica >= fileReplication) { + neededReplications.remove(block); + } else {noformat} > DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > Attachments: CpuPendingTransfer3.patch > > > When the namenode is restarted, the datanodes register and each block is inserted into neededReplication. When the namenode exists, safemode it sees starts processing neededReplication. It picks up a block from neededReplication, sees that it has already has the required number of replicas, and continues to the next block in neededReplication. The blocks remain in neededReplication permanentlyhe namenode worker thread to scans this huge list of blocks once every 3 seconds. This consumes plenty of CPU on the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14900-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 15 17:08:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13A584076 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30541 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 17:08:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30287 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 17:08:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30276 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2011 17:08:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:08:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:08:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B42CBF7A for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Henry (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1312765634.14050.1305479267458.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7293) missing spaces in error messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org missing spaces in error messages -------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7293 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: native Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Robert Henry Priority: Trivial Error message(s) are missing spaces. Here's an example output: 11/05/15 09:44:10 WARN mapred.JobClient: Error reading task outputhttp:// Generated from this line of source. ./src/mapred/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/JobClient.java: LOG.warn("Error reading task output" + ioe.getMessage()); The 1st arg to LOG.warn should end with a ' '. There may be other instances of this problem in the source base. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14901-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 15 19:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 752874128 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 19:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14750 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 19:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14221 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 19:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13980 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2011 19:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 19:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 19:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692D8CB3D7 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1266286744.14128.1305486827427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6865) there will be ant error if ant ran without network connected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033800#comment-13033800 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6865: ---------------------------------------- Fixes for this -store the ivy file in the source tree and use it that way -store the SHA1 checksum of the ivy file, and verify that the doenloaded artifact in the ivy cache dir matches it. That's a good security check anyway. > there will be ant error if ant ran without network connected > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6865 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6865 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: centos 5.4 > Reporter: Evan Wang > > If you run `ant` without network connected, there will be an error below. And even if you connect your network, the error will exist. > ivy-init-antlib: > [typedef] java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file > [typedef] at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) > [typedef] at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:114) > [typedef] at java.util.zip.ZipFile.(ZipFile.java:131) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.AntClassLoader.getResourceURL(AntClassLoader.java:1028) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.AntClassLoader$ResourceEnumeration.findNextResource(AntClassLoader.java:147) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.AntClassLoader$ResourceEnumeration.(AntClassLoader.java:109) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.AntClassLoader.findResources(AntClassLoader.java:975) > [typedef] at java.lang.ClassLoader.getResources(ClassLoader.java:1016) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Definer.resourceToURLs(Definer.java:364) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Definer.execute(Definer.java:256) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:288) > [typedef] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source) > [typedef] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > [typedef] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:106) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:357) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:385) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1337) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1306) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecutor.java:41) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1189) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:758) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:217) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:257) > [typedef] at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:104) > [typedef] Could not load definitions from resource org/apache/ivy/ant/antlib.xml. It could not be found. > BUILD FAILED > /opt/hadoop-0.20.2/build.xml:1644: You need Apache Ivy 2.0 or later from http://ant.apache.org/ > It could not be loaded from http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.0.0-rc2/ivy-2.0.0-rc2.jar -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14902-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 00:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B41245E1 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 00:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22830 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22786 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22778 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 00:44:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 00:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 00:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8543FCB8F8 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 00:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 00:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <847667848.14365.1305506627542.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-7278: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Patch is ready for review. > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7278.patch > > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14903-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 15:08:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30BF46778 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80154 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:08:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79745 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:08:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79731 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 15:08:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:08:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:08:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F3CCC263 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vitalii Tymchyshyn (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7294 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn I get next exception when try to use append: 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): $ stat --help stat: illegal option -- - usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] $ stat -f%l a_file 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14904-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 15:56:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C8ED6217 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82693 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:56:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82660 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:56:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82652 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 15:56:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:56:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:56:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D8ACC531 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <394682192.15518.1305561347352.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7292: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch The v1 patch uses proper barrier for thread coordination. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14905-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 15:58:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBB14625C for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85943 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85904 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 15:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85896 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 15:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880A9CC60D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1340762965.15522.1305561467554.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7292: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14906-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B4AF6D1E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48869 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48717 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48709 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A673CC375 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <891531383.15685.1305566027629.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034105#comment-13034105 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7294: ------------------------------------------- Vitalli, AFAIK, most of the shell calls were written with Linux in mind, and that platform is what we recommend to use as well (so far). Would you have a solution that would work on all platforms for this? A patch would be great as well, but just tips otherwise would be nice too! > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14907-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE3966D8D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94863 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94797 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94787 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619E8CC2EC for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <715152037.15862.1305567828396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034144#comment-13034144 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7291: ----------------------------------------- I see hudson pre-commit builds failing with this: [exec] Total time: 4 seconds [exec] ERROR: usage /grid/0/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/trunk/src/test/bin/test-patch.sh HUDSON Eli or Nigel, could you please take a look at this? This is urgent, since pre-commit builds cannot be run. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14908-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E60D6D9C for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95088 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95056 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95048 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A28CC2C5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1782565336.15835.1305567827527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034142#comment-13034142 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------------------- https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Hdfs-Build/524/console This is breaking all the test-patch build of hdfs > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14909-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:48:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C702F6242 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 245 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:48:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 211 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 196 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:48:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:48:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:48:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57907CC4BD for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1977167381.15871.1305568067355.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034146#comment-13034146 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------------------- bq. Right, looking at the log more closely ("-c: command not found") it looks like GREP is not defined. How is test-patch being called? test-patch is called through ant build.xml hudson-test-patch target. ${ANT_HOME}/bin/ant \ -Dpatch.file=foobar \ -Dscratch.dir=${WORKSPACE}/patchprocess \ -Dsupport.dir=/homes/hudson/buildSupport \ -Dps.cmd=/bin/ps \ -Dwget.cmd=/usr/bin/wget \ -Djiracli.cmd=/homes/hudson/tools/jiracli-1.5/jira \ -Dsvn.cmd=/usr/bin/svn \ -Dgrep.cmd=/bin/grep \ -Dpatch.cmd=/usr/bin/patch \ -Dfindbugs.home=/homes/hudson/tools/findbugs/latest \ -Dforrest.home=/homes/hudson/tools/forrest/latest \ -Declipse.home=/homes/hudson/tools/eclipse/latest \ -Dpython.home=/homes/hudson/tools/python/latest \ -Djira.passwd=<> \ -Dcurl.cmd=/usr/bin/curl \ -Ddefect=HDFS-${ISSUE_NUM} \ hudson-test-patch > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14910-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F10206425 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8748 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8719 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8711 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:54:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEC5CC72D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1939893547.15883.1305568427434.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034148#comment-13034148 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------------------ > ... This is urgent, since pre-commit builds cannot be run. How about we temporarily revert the committed patch? > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14911-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 17:58:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 188F86501 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14224 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:58:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14185 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 17:58:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14177 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 17:58:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:58:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:58:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7320BCC94E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <305644102.15898.1305568667468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034153#comment-13034153 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------ Alejandro, great to see someone working on this! Would you please add to your "still to be done" list -- * Eclipse integration, especially: ** Eclipse project files generation (hopefully more reliably, automatically, and with less maintenance effort than currently); ** JUnit execution under the Eclipse-native "Java Builder" in the IDE (which works fine today as long as the dependencies and Build Path have been made available to Eclipse in the way it needs - which today usually requires changes to those Eclipse project files). If this was so obvious you forgot to mention it :-) or if the maven plug-in for Eclipse will just make this happen, that's great, please let me know. But please do include this in the scope of work, because some of us are very dependent on the Eclipse IDE for our quality of life! Thanks. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14912-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 18:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 802DD638B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25386 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25354 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25346 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9662CCB86 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272116326.15953.1305568907952.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034156#comment-13034156 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7291: ----------------------------------------- I have reverted the patch for now. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14913-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 18:21:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B329763AD for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61859 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:21:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61832 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 18:21:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61817 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 18:21:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:21:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:21:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F11CCD3B9 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:20:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2106674625.16038.1305570052254.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034169#comment-13034169 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------- bq. if the maven plug-in for Eclipse will just make this happen, that's great, please let me know. Confirmed. mvn eclipse:eclipse should suffice. If you use m2eclipse IDE plugin than the step is not needed either. BTW, NetBeans supports maven projects natively (without any plugins). > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14914-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 19:22:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05C1C6465 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58469 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58432 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58291 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E9ECCD9F for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:21:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <980162350.16264.1305573708356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034212#comment-13034212 ] Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- Glad to see people are interested in this. Luke, thanks for the Eclipse info (I don't use Eclipse. I use IntelliJ, IntelliJ integrates nicely with Maven, you just open the POM as a project and you are done). JUnit execution should work fine if you first compile the testcases from Maven (running 'mvn test -DskipTests'), I do that trick for IntelliJ. And, if I'm not mistaken you should be able to configure the IDE to this automatically (or an IDE click). > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14915-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 19:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C63860E7 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99185 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99127 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99111 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 19:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B4ACC874 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:42:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1539780569.16356.1305574968130.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034233#comment-13034233 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- Nigel and I discussed. We need to: # Apply the HADOOP-7291.patch again # Update the Hudson job to not pass the python argument I'm doing #1, Nigel is doing #2. Apologies for the disruption guys! > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14916-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 19:47:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEB8761D8 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7511 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:47:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7465 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:47:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7443 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 19:47:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:47:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:47:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9C9CCB55 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1229022541.16370.1305575207445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7295) Create a test-patch script for Hudson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Create a test-patch script for Hudson ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7295 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7295 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Task Reporter: Eli Collins We should create a script that Hudson uses to execute test-patch that is in source control so modifications to test-patch.sh arguments can be done w/o updating Hudson. The script would execute the following, and take just the password as an argument. {noformat} ${ANT_HOME}/bin/ant \ -Dpatch.file=foobar \ -Dscratch.dir=${WORKSPACE}/patchprocess \ -Dsupport.dir=/homes/hudson/buildSupport \ -Dps.cmd=/bin/ps \ -Dwget.cmd=/usr/bin/wget \ -Djiracli.cmd=/homes/hudson/tools/jiracli-1.5/jira \ -Dsvn.cmd=/usr/bin/svn \ -Dgrep.cmd=/bin/grep \ -Dpatch.cmd=/usr/bin/patch \ -Dfindbugs.home=/homes/hudson/tools/findbugs/latest \ -Dforrest.home=/homes/hudson/tools/forrest/latest \ -Declipse.home=/homes/hudson/tools/eclipse/latest \ -Dpython.home=/homes/hudson/tools/python/latest \ -Djira.passwd=******** \ -Dcurl.cmd=/usr/bin/curl \ -Ddefect=HADOOP-${ISSUE_NUM} \ hudson-test-patch {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14917-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 19:57:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA756956 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27675 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:57:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27641 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 19:57:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27633 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 19:57:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:57:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:57:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793CECCF39 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1212620270.16403.1305575807492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1229022541.16370.1305575207445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7295) Create a test-patch script for Hudson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034245#comment-13034245 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7295: --------------------------------------- I'm not sure how useful this is. There is way too much embedded context here for it to be useful even in another hudson environment. > Create a test-patch script for Hudson > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7295 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7295 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > > We should create a script that Hudson uses to execute test-patch that is in source control so modifications to test-patch.sh arguments can be done w/o updating Hudson. > The script would execute the following, and take just the password as an argument. > {noformat} > ${ANT_HOME}/bin/ant \ > -Dpatch.file=foobar \ > -Dscratch.dir=${WORKSPACE}/patchprocess \ > -Dsupport.dir=/homes/hudson/buildSupport \ > -Dps.cmd=/bin/ps \ > -Dwget.cmd=/usr/bin/wget \ > -Djiracli.cmd=/homes/hudson/tools/jiracli-1.5/jira \ > -Dsvn.cmd=/usr/bin/svn \ > -Dgrep.cmd=/bin/grep \ > -Dpatch.cmd=/usr/bin/patch \ > -Dfindbugs.home=/homes/hudson/tools/findbugs/latest \ > -Dforrest.home=/homes/hudson/tools/forrest/latest \ > -Declipse.home=/homes/hudson/tools/eclipse/latest \ > -Dpython.home=/homes/hudson/tools/python/latest \ > -Djira.passwd=******** \ > -Dcurl.cmd=/usr/bin/curl \ > -Ddefect=HADOOP-${ISSUE_NUM} \ > hudson-test-patch > {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14918-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:01:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FECF62AF for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35001 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34973 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34955 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:01:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A210CC193 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vitalii Tymchyshyn (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <452561078.16431.1305576047627.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034251#comment-13034251 ] Vitalii Tymchyshyn commented on HADOOP-7294: -------------------------------------------- Actually there is support for Windows and Mac in the code, so the thing to be changed is to rename Mac to BSD and treat FreeBSD as BSD. In general, I'd prefer it to be configurable. > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14919-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F046C60F4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38387 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38347 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38339 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85888CC3EB for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <933340404.16438.1305576287543.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <177713183.11069.1305315587397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7290) Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034254#comment-13034254 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7290: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) > Unit test failure in TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7290 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7290 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Environment: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:31:24 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode) > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: test > Attachments: TestUserGroupInformation-id-order.patch > > > Testsuite: org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation > Tests run: 14, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.278 sec > ------------- Standard Output --------------- > trobinson:users guest git > ------------- ---------------- --------------- > Testcase: testGetServerSideGroups took 0.051 sec > FAILED > expected: but was: > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected: but was: > at org.apache.hadoop.security.TestUserGroupInformation.testGetServerSideGroups(TestUserGroupInformation.java:94) > It seems like the test is assuming that the groups returned by UserGroupInformation.getGroupNames() are in the same order as those returned by executing `id -Gn`. getGroupNames() only documents that the primary group is first, and `man id` doesn't document any ordering, so it seems like the test needs to be reworked to remove that assumption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14920-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61F506101 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38608 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38584 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38576 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC64CC3FC for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1826467211.16451.1305576287958.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <32042405.8638.1305244247592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7285) Refactor FsShell's test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034257#comment-13034257 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7285: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) > Refactor FsShell's test > ----------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7285 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7285-2.patch, HADOOP-7285-3.patch, HADOOP-7285.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14921-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90625610E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38799 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38766 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38672 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05658CC3FE for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <109430860.16453.1305576288018.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034258#comment-13034258 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14922-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C09D6122 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39329 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39288 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39280 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD65CC3F3 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <916913503.16444.1305576287700.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034255#comment-13034255 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14923-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C6576135 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39532 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39482 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39422 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6943CC3F6 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1845314585.16447.1305576287810.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034256#comment-13034256 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14924-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:05:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 746CE614B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41160 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41115 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:05:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41079 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:05:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:05:47 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4977ECC409 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1901831897.16462.1305576288297.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <539645178.10940.1305312827448.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7289) ivy: test conf should not extend common conf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034259#comment-13034259 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7289: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #601 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/601/]) > ivy: test conf should not extend common conf > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7289 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7289 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7289-1.patch, HADOOP-7289.patch, c7289_20110513.patch, c7289_20110513b.patch > > > Otherwise, the same jars will appear in both {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/common/}} and {{build/ivy/lib/Hadoop-Common/test/}}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14925-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:09:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BD23624D for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45725 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45683 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45675 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BFBCC6D9 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1403526156.16474.1305576527622.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034261#comment-13034261 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #675 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/675/]) HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14926-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:25:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F17A96ADA for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72191 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72160 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72129 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:25:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6221ECCE50 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <773602986.16554.1305577487398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1117) DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034279#comment-13034279 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-1117: ------------------------------------ Hey Eli, did you notice the timestamp on this Jira? :-) Current trunk code is fine. > DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > Attachments: CpuPendingTransfer3.patch > > > When the namenode is restarted, the datanodes register and each block is inserted into neededReplication. When the namenode exists, safemode it sees starts processing neededReplication. It picks up a block from neededReplication, sees that it has already has the required number of replicas, and continues to the next block in neededReplication. The blocks remain in neededReplication permanentlyhe namenode worker thread to scans this huge list of blocks once every 3 seconds. This consumes plenty of CPU on the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14927-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E3506DB5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88073 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88014 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87889 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E6CC1F8 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1072940974.16581.1305577967728.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2007918179.15449.1305558467414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7294) FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034287#comment-13034287 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7294: ------------------------------------- In general, we try to follow BSD semantics (http://hadoop.apache.org/hdfs/docs/r0.21.0/hdfs_permissions_guide.html). > FileUtil uses wrong stat command for FreeBSD > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7294 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7294 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE > Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn > > I get next exception when try to use append: > 2011-05-16 17:07:54,648 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: DatanodeRegistration(10.112.0.207:50010, storageID=DS-1047171559- > 10.112.0.207-50010-1302796304164, infoPort=50075, ipcPort=50020):DataXceiver > java.io.IOException: Failed to get link count on file /var/data/hdfs/data/current/finalized/subdir26/subdir17/subdir55/blk_-1266943884751786595: > message=null; error=stat: illegal option -- c; exit value=1 > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.createIOException(FileUtil.java:709) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil.access$000(FileUtil.java:42) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil$HardLink.getLinkCount(FileUtil.java:682) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.ReplicaInfo.unlinkBlock(ReplicaInfo.java:215) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.FSDataset.append(FSDataset.java:1116) > It seems that FreeBSD is treated like UNIX and so calls 'stat -c%h', while FreeBSD is much more like Mac (since they have same BSD roots): > $ stat --help > stat: illegal option -- - > usage: stat [-FlLnqrsx] [-f format] [-t timefmt] [file ...] > $ stat -f%l a_file > 1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14928-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 20:39:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 279226475 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97266 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97195 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 20:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97131 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 20:39:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:39:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:39:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B0CCC5F0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 20:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1389909957.16601.1305578327589.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7286-3.patch Addresses Aaron and Todd's comments. Added deprecation warnings for dus, rmr, lsr. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14929-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:34:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2A56CCA for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15812 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15708 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15685 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD03CC08B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1003565032.16776.1305581627643.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-1117) DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034330#comment-13034330 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-1117: ------------------------------------- Ha. Thanks Matt =) > DFS Scalability: When the namenode is restarted it consumes 80% CPU > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1117 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1117 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.12.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.12.1 > > Attachments: CpuPendingTransfer3.patch > > > When the namenode is restarted, the datanodes register and each block is inserted into neededReplication. When the namenode exists, safemode it sees starts processing neededReplication. It picks up a block from neededReplication, sees that it has already has the required number of replicas, and continues to the next block in neededReplication. The blocks remain in neededReplication permanentlyhe namenode worker thread to scans this huge list of blocks once every 3 seconds. This consumes plenty of CPU on the namenode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14930-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D15F7612F for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40345 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40306 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40255 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D11DCC686 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <201087021.16828.1305582048246.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034345#comment-13034345 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6929: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm. This is required for mrv2. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14931-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 21:51:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CAD96AA4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60851 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60797 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60740 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 21:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F08CCC9B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <680844338.16891.1305582647737.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034353#comment-13034353 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7286: ---------------------------------------- Latest patch looks to be almost there. A few nits: # Comment in {{FsUsage.java}} still references "viewing capacity." You also might as well explicitly say something like "this is the base class for the {{df}} and {{du}} commands. # I think the {{deprecatedFor(...)}} interface could be clearer. I think "{{boolean isDeprecated(...)}}" and something like "{{String getPreferredCommand(...)}}" would be a lot quicker to understand. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14932-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:02:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9FBF61AE for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96239 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96196 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96148 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191D0CD1EE for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <840135816.16942.1305583308099.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu reassigned HADOOP-7144: ------------------------------- Assignee: Luke Lu > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14933-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D26C76E5A for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26236 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26183 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26136 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05691CD6A7 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <612520859.17015.1305584028018.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034376#comment-13034376 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7286: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479380/HADOOP-7286-3.patch against trunk revision 1103856. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/456//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/456//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/456//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14934-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F824600F for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32389 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32350 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32331 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900ACCD7D8 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <388315238.17025.1305584267586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034378#comment-13034378 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #676 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/676/]) MAPREDUCE-2499. MR part of HADOOP-7291. Contributed by Eli Collins > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14935-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:28:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E230B69EA for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39409 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39379 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39371 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:28:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:28:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:28:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8EACDA84 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1264698948.17047.1305584867445.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7291-3.patch After HDFS-1946 and MR-2499 the common, HDFS and MR precommit jobs run though looks like $GREP is not defined. This is because a new call to runContribTests was introduced in HADOOP-7291.patch which runs before parseArgs. We don't need this call. The attached patch removes it. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14936-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FA1664C2 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41566 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:32:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41541 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:32:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41532 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:32:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:32:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18302CDB44 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:31:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <206624094.17056.1305585109095.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034386#comment-13034386 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7291: ------------------------------------- +1 for HADOOP-7291-3.patch > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14937-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:34:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF6B96E82 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47423 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47379 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47366 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA31CDC85 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <603774443.17067.1305585227585.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14938-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:36:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3EAA6F79 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49828 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49801 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49793 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:36:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:36:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDBDCDD46 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:35:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1110589074.17078.1305585348184.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034389#comment-13034389 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7291: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479396/HADOOP-7291-3.patch against trunk revision 1103931. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/458//console This message is automatically generated. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14939-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:38:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA8696FFE for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51744 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51710 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51702 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:38:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:38:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820FCDDF0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <430434228.17085.1305585467488.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7286-4.patch Per Aaron, switched back to is/get methods for deprecation queries, and updated comments to be more succinct. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14940-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:42:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 278B660A7 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56047 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55949 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55682 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:42:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:42:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:42:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F31CDF7B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1324181642.17097.1305585707627.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034395#comment-13034395 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7286: ---------------------------------------- +1, the patch looks good to me. Thanks a lot, Daryn. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14941-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 390346147 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59824 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59795 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59787 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79ABCC0E4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1776287126.17112.1305585827748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks Todd. I've committed this to trunk and 22. Verified that the precommit Hudson job runs now. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14942-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 22:54:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 902D267F1 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71588 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71482 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 22:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71374 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 22:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F22CC4E5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 22:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <458472779.17142.1305586427877.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034404#comment-13034404 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #602 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/602/]) HADOOP-7291. Remove spurious call to runTestContrib. Contributed by Eli Collins > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14943-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 23:10:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A74056FEF for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91421 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 23:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91378 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 23:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91362 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 23:10:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:10:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52FACCB4E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <454491278.17189.1305587387804.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034414#comment-13034414 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #677 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/677/]) HADOOP-7291. Remove spurious call to runTestContrib. Contributed by Eli Collins > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14944-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 16 23:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB806F33 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11181 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 23:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11153 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2011 23:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11144 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2011 23:31:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:31:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:31:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F27ACD140 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 23:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <122961875.17254.1305588647583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034423#comment-13034423 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7286: ------------------------------------- The patch changes the output in a couple ways that are worth considering: - It used to print a line saying "Found n items" at the top of the output - The paths used to be fully qualified but no longer are example output before patch for "hadoop fs -du /home/todd/tokyo-nosql/": {noformat} Found 3 items 3429427 file:/home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql.pdf 1255650 file:/home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql-slides-only.pdf 4798464 file:/home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql.ppt {noformat} After: {noformat} 3429427 /home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql.pdf 1255650 /home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql-slides-only.pdf 4798464 /home/todd/tokyo-nosql/tokyo-nosql.ppt {noformat} Are these conscious changes that we're OK with? > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14945-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 722686C26 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41634 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41594 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41585 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BF4CD8DD for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <642504288.17346.1305590688093.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034438#comment-13034438 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- Alejandro, I think {{mvn test-compile}} should do the same. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14946-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:13:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44A696D7F for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48401 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:13:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48356 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48340 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:13:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:13:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BF9CDA73 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2113194951.17355.1305591167425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034441#comment-13034441 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7286: ------------------------------------- The changes were deliberate on my part. Here's my thoughts: FsShell tries to implement posix/unix-like commands, but does so in its own "uniquely" inconsistent fashion which is a surprise to any shell coder. IMHO, if FsShell wants to be unix-like, then it's output should look unix-like, or at a minimum be self-consistent. I think du is the only command that is "noticably" different, particularly with regard to the subtraction of the header. I checked "du" on various systems and didn't find any that printed "Found XXX items". Going forward, I think du should be able to traverse more than one level deep, at which point it becomes prohibitively expensive for du to sponge memory to batch up all the output just so it can print a total on the first line. Regarding the path display, it's been a universal change to standardize how paths are displayed since the commands' errors and output used to be wildly inconsistent. Typically what you give on the cmdline is now what you get back, just like you would expect from a unix-like system. Although, I can tweak the du output to be absolute uris if necessary. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14947-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:19:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBF096103 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55626 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:19:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55583 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55575 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:19:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:19:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789DBCDC83 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <55262557.17388.1305591527490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change] That seems OK to me. I've marked this JIRA as an incompatible change - please add a release note that details the change in format. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14948-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:27:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B1CE63DA for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65304 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65246 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:27:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65237 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:27:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:27:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:27:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567DBCDEBA for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <966607170.17400.1305592007351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Release Note: The "Found X items" header has been removed to more closely match unix. The displayed paths now correspond to the command line arguments instead of always being a fully qualified URI. Ie. The output will have relative paths if the command line arguments are relative paths. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14949-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB63A67D7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69585 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:33:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69563 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:33:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69555 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:33:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:33:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:33:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855ECDFF6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <632281247.17404.1305592367423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034451#comment-13034451 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7286: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479398/HADOOP-7286-4.patch against trunk revision 1103931. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/459//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/459//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/459//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14950-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:37:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4A616A3E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73807 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:37:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73773 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:37:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73765 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:37:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:37:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:37:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78982CD11B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <901054010.17421.1305592607490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034453#comment-13034453 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7292: ------------------------------------- Hi Luke. I think the CountdownLatch should be a local variable in newSleepingConsumerQueue -- otherwise, the latch gets reused between test functions. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14951-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:43:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71F5D6BA4 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81256 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81208 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81167 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:43:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:43:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:43:35 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22A0CD366 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <52900663.17469.1305592974923.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7269: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14952-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:49:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE3A960B9 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93156 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93118 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93110 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01CECD448 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1358563853.17474.1305593327718.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034460#comment-13034460 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7292: --------------------------------- I was planning to use the latch for other tests as well. The latch will not be reused because junit creates a new instance of the test object for each test method: http://martinfowler.com/bliki/JunitNewInstance.html > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14953-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D26A860E1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95176 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:51:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95152 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:51:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95144 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:51:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:51:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CBACD4A8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <684904726.17478.1305593447351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034461#comment-13034461 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7292: ------------------------------------- aha, I guess I learn something new every day :) Nonetheless since it's only used in that local scope for now, why not minimize it? Makes it easier to understand that it's only triggered from that thread and awaited from the other. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14954-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD978612F for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97330 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97289 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97281 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75885CD5DF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <541311677.17484.1305593687478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Release Note: The "Found X items" header on the output of the "du" command has been removed to more closely match unix. The displayed paths now correspond to the command line arguments instead of always being a fully qualified URI. For example, the output will have relative paths if the command line arguments are relative paths. (was: The "Found X items" header has been removed to more closely match unix. The displayed paths now correspond to the command line arguments instead of always being a fully qualified URI. Ie. The output will have relative paths if the command line arguments are relative paths.) Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) +1, committing to trunk. Thanks, Daryn! > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14955-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 00:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47EB6148 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98008 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97978 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97970 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 00:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F32CD5E6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:54:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <272836745.17491.1305593688328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14956-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87EEC6667 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1503 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1415 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1372 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCA6CD926 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1737891034.17560.1305594288118.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7292: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch Patch v2 make the barrier local for better readability. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14957-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:05:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 542CA66EA for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3075 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3033 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2927 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4856CD958 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:04:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2083574700.17571.1305594288670.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7292: ---------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14958-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:07:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCEB4674B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7232 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:07:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7200 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:07:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7192 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:07:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:07:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EA6CD9D4 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1236983986.17574.1305594407393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7292: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14959-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:09:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7CBD6799 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8329 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:09:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8293 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:09:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8285 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:09:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E82CDA7C for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1187897026.17584.1305594527549.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7292: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14960-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:09:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1574A67A2 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8593 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:09:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8549 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:09:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8541 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:09:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F81CDA7A for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1342812716.17582.1305594527492.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034474#comment-13034474 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7292: ------------------------------------- +1. Will commit to trunk momentarily (manually ran the one changed test case) > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14961-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 01:15:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2DF46AB0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16395 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:15:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16370 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 01:15:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16362 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 01:15:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:15:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:15:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6347DCDC47 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 01:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <906014472.17608.1305594887403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034479#comment-13034479 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #603 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/603/]) HADOOP-7286. Refactor the du/dus/df commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14962-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:24:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C54E41E5 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60575 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60506 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60362 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691B2CDB86 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7296 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Reporter: Siddharth Seth Priority: Minor The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14963-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:26:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0F2E41F0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62002 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:26:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61968 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61960 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:26:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:26:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:26:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4CCDC22 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <687982308.17710.1305599147450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated HADOOP-7296: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP7296.patch Patch. > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14964-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:28:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E0D3423C for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63334 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63300 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63291 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:28:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:28:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C0BCDC8E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1039923360.17714.1305599267679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated HADOOP-7296: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14965-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:30:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DFDC4528 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64550 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64521 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64513 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E82CDD50 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <37886702.17723.1305599387884.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034505#comment-13034505 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7296: ---------------------------------------- Hi Siddarth, The patch looks pretty good, though it looks to me like your patch introduces a tab character in {{src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/permission/FsPermission.java}}. Our convention is to expand these into spaces. Would you mind uploading a new version without the tab? Also, what version of Hadoop is this patch for? Please fill in the affects version field as appropriate. > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14966-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8012848E5 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71892 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71720 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71684 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D37CDFF1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <89297733.17742.1305600227401.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated HADOOP-7296: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP7296_2.patch Thanks for looking at it. Fixed the tab. This exists in 0.21 and subsequent versions. Will mark that. > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14967-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 02:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11A3E4495 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72430 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72243 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 02:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72234 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 02:46:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:46:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:46:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541C3CD05B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 02:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 02:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1233771820.17751.1305600347341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siddharth Seth updated HADOOP-7296: ----------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 0.22.0 0.21.0 > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14968-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 04:36:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF614FCF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36864 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 04:36:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36748 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 04:36:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36729 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 04:36:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5B6CD7EE for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 04:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1270466137.17978.1305606947583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6757) NullPointerException for hadoop clients launched from streaming tasks MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034547#comment-13034547 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6757: ----------------------------------- I think this may be fixed by MAPREDUCE-2372. > NullPointerException for hadoop clients launched from streaming tasks > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6757 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: scripts > Reporter: Amar Kamat > Assignee: Amar Kamat > Attachments: BZ-3620565-v1.0.patch, HADOOP-6757-v1.0.patch > > > TaskRunner sets HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER to info,TLA while launching the child tasks. TLA implicitly assumes that that task-id information will be made available via the 'hadoop.tasklog.taskid' parameter. 'hadoop.tasklog.taskid' is passed to the child task by the TaskRunner via HADOOP_CLIENT_OPTS. When the streaming task launches a hadoop client (say hadoop job -list), the HADOOP_ROOT_LOGGER of the hadoop client is set to 'info,TLA' but hadoop.tasklog.taskid is not set resulting into NPE. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14969-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 04:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D88409A for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40717 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 04:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40674 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 04:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40665 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 04:40:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:40:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:40:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB50CD920 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 04:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2080004464.17987.1305607187376.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034550#comment-13034550 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7296: ---------------------------------------- +1, the patch looks good to me. > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14970-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 05:24:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 106F1461D for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70492 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70385 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70370 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 05:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:24:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E63FCD2FA for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <137321665.18044.1305609827449.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034562#comment-13034562 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7282: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479182/HADOOP-7282-1.patch against trunk revision 1103971. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/461//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/461//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/461//console This message is automatically generated. > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14971-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 05:36:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570814C6B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74446 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:36:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74413 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:36:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74390 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 05:36:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0CECD5D4 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <856690449.18051.1305610547378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1894387424.4008.1305137809491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7278) Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034564#comment-13034564 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7278: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479155/HADOOP-7278.patch against trunk revision 1103971. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/462//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/462//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/462//console This message is automatically generated. > Automatic Hadoop cluster deployment for build validation > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7278 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Environment: Apache Jenkins > Reporter: Konstantin Boudnik > Assignee: Konstantin Boudnik > Labels: newbie > Attachments: HADOOP-7278.patch > > > It'd be great to have a way of automatically deploying Hadoop cluster to a set of machine once all components are successfully built (in the form or tar or whatever). Deployed cluster then can be used to run a set of validation jobs to make sure that produced artifacts are viable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14972-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 05:38:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C07F4CFC for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76292 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:38:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76062 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75980 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 05:38:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:38:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:38:49 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8016ECD972 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:37:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1892097529.18103.1305610669521.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034574#comment-13034574 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #658 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/658/]) > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14973-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 05:39:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E2534DB1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78598 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:39:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78214 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78056 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 05:39:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:39:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:39:09 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F78CD9AB for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:37:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <335920735.18153.1305610671414.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034586#comment-13034586 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #658 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/658/]) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14974-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 05:48:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57F87407B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86979 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86947 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 05:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86939 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 05:48:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:48:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:48:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893CDCDC58 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 05:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 05:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755942112.18168.1305611267558.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034588#comment-13034588 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7292: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #604 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/604/]) HADOOP-7292. Fix racy test case TestSinkQueue. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14975-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 06:08:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46F614C08 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 676 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 06:08:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 337 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 06:08:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 327 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 06:08:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:08:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:08:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A88C730A for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 06:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <386472367.18252.1305612467790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034595#comment-13034595 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7296: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479423/HADOOP7296_2.patch against trunk revision 1103971. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/463//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/463//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/463//console This message is automatically generated. > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14976-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 06:24:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B241843D1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16552 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 06:24:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16447 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 06:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16435 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 06:24:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:24:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:24:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6F6C785B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 06:23:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "issei yoshida (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1338047981.18317.1305613429567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034599#comment-13034599 ] issei yoshida commented on HADOOP-7206: --------------------------------------- As a result of talking with Alejandro and Tom, we agree that we'll give up the integration into Hadoop core and cancel Hadoop-7206, because to avoid confusion with users/developers, the code should be in one place either a separate project or integrated into hadoop core. The hadoop-snappy as an independent project have the flexibility of doing releases and bug fixes independent of Hadoop releases, so I think I'll continue to develop hadoop-snappy only. Thanks. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14978-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 08:52:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC9CA486C for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82390 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82325 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82292 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 08:52:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC49CD806 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <434557255.18499.1305622307573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash2.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14977-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 08:52:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC3A1486A for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82350 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82318 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82283 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 08:52:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70183CD7FF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <356752016.18495.1305622307455.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034632#comment-13034632 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- trash.isEnabled() was redundant - #moveToTrash() checks that first. #moveToApropriateTrash() calls #moveToTrash(). The unit test ended being small code but harder than it looked (partly because of home dir being /Users and /user in different systems - we want to the test to work on linux and mac.) Did some further cleanup of tests and resolved a bug in chRootedFs(). The FileSystem cache causes some weird problems -- one thinks one gets independent FileSystems but not true because of wd. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14979-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 08:52:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60F2C4886 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82863 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82814 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 08:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82806 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 08:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C07CD808 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <309808595.18501.1305622307626.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14980-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B98241AC for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5697 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5653 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5645 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:14:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C92CD0EB for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <99554649.18535.1305623627478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034636#comment-13034636 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479439/trash2.patch against trunk revision 1103971. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/464//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/464//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/464//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14981-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 149344474 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50313 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50272 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50264 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:44:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E012CDE20 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1913147996.18584.1305625427512.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <683476535.2038.1300136250528.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7189) Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034648#comment-13034648 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7189: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/49/]) > Add ability to enable 'debug' property in JAAS configuration > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7189 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7189 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Ted Yu > Priority: Minor > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7189.patch, HADOOP-7189.txt, enable-UGI-debug-example.txt > > > Occasionally users have run into weird "Unable to login" messages. Unfortunately, JAAS obscures the underlying exception message in many cases because it thinks leaking the exception might be insecure in itself. Enabling the "debug" option in the JAAS configuration gets it to dump the underlying issue and makes troubleshooting this kind of issue easier. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14982-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F8EC4487 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50575 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50537 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50528 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA42CDE2E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1236405800.18596.1305625427908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <510617684.3042.1300172489780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7192) fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034650#comment-13034650 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7192: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/49/]) > fs -stat docs aren't updated to reflect the format features > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7192 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux / 0.20 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Trivial > Labels: documentaion > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop.common.fsstatdoc.r1.diff > > Original Estimate: 1m > Remaining Estimate: 1m > > The html docs of the 'fs -stat' command (that is found listed in the File System Shell Guide), does not seem to have the formatting abilities of -stat explained (along with the options). > Like 'fs -help', the docs must also reflect the latest available features. > I shall attach a doc-fix patch shortly. > If anyone has other discrepancies to point out in the web version of the guide, please do so :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14984-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:44:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AD9544B0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51641 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51595 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51557 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5E1CDE38 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <205173048.18605.1305625428248.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034652#comment-13034652 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/49/]) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14983-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:44:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4E1E44BB for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51539 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51499 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51464 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29670CDE36 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <743812508.18603.1305625428166.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034651#comment-13034651 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/49/]) > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14985-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 09:44:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81B8C44DB for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52295 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52262 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 09:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52221 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 09:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9487CDE2B for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1108782929.18593.1305625427821.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034649#comment-13034649 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/49/]) HADOOP-7291. svn merge -c 1103931 from trunk > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14986-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D66AC4A1E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99763 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99724 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99708 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58136CD8BC for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1562014881.18870.1305630828357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1619049648.8641.1305244247668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7286) Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034717#comment-13034717 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7286: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #691 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/691/]) HADOOP-7286. Refactor the du/dus/df commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. > Refactor FsShell's du/dus/df > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7286 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7286 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7286-2.patch, HADOOP-7286-3.patch, HADOOP-7286-4.patch, HADOOP-7286.patch > > > Need to refactor to conform to FsCommand subclass. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14987-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1298D4A28 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99917 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99726 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99709 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D100CD8B2 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1258061734.18862.1305630828115.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034715#comment-13034715 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #691 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/691/]) HADOOP-7291. Remove spurious call to runTestContrib. Contributed by Eli Collins HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley Reverting the change r1102914 for HADOOP-7291 to fix build issues. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14988-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 505334A30 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 217 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 160 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99756 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39136CD8B6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1528579043.18866.1305630828230.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <866597877.11958.1305329567592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7292) Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034716#comment-13034716 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7292: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #691 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/691/]) HADOOP-7292. Fix racy test case TestSinkQueue. Contributed by Luke Lu. > Metrics 2 TestSinkQueue is racy > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7292 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7292 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7292-test-race-v1.patch, hadoop-7292-test-race-v2.patch > > > The TestSinkQueue is racy (Thread.yield is not enough to guarantee other intended thread getting run), though it's the first time (from HADOOP-7289) I saw it manifested here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14989-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B1D04130 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29195 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:20:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29159 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29146 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8C4CDAEC for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1226031152.18878.1305631187506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff Removed abstraction of metadata at the top-level FileSystem. Metadata is now only supported by the NativeS3FileSystem, and you'll need to cast explicitly in order to use it. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14990-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54054413E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29366 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29299 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29207 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83011CDAED for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <799978699.18879.1305631187533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nicholas Telford updated HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Release Note: Added support for arbitrary file metadata when creating a new file on the NativeS3FileSystem. (was: Added support for arbitrary file metadata when creating a new file on a FileSystem that supports metadata.) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14991-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 11:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70D334655 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45876 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45841 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 11:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45833 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 11:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:33:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C17CD041 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2101837345.18901.1305631968851.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034725#comment-13034725 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479451/HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff against trunk revision 1103971. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1070 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1068 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/465//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/465//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/465//console This message is automatically generated. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14992-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 12:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 837944CAF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7212 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 12:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7153 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 12:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6975 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 12:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:14:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CADCDF3D for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1562691557.18939.1305634427409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------- Description: Problem Statement: =============== There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. Scenario ======= During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. Solution: ======= While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: ===================================== We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. was: Problem Statement: =============== There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. Scenario ======= During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. Solution: ======= While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: ===================================== We have many wrapped stream for writing and reading. These wrappers are prone to errors. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14993-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 13:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 484564597 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20283 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20195 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20186 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 13:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B159ACD7C5 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <317037825.19028.1305638087723.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034747#comment-13034747 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch #52 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-22-branch/52/]) HADOOP-7291. svn merge -c 1103931 from trunk > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14994-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 15:20:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F90146FD for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99599 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99563 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99554 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 15:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:20:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEC4CD198 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "arnaud p (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7297 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 Reporter: arnaud p Priority: Trivial On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14995-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 15:41:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D4904D05 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73171 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73053 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73021 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 15:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6BACDDB7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1307298103.19384.1305646847699.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034822#comment-13034822 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #682 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/682/]) HADOOP-7291. Remove spurious call to runTestContrib. Contributed by Eli Collins MAPREDUCE-2499. MR part of HADOOP-7291. Contributed by Eli Collins HADOOP-7291. Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib. Contributed by Nigel Daley Reverting the change r1102914 for HADOOP-7291 to fix build issues. > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14996-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 15:47:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 404914B31 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88343 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88286 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88278 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 15:47:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:47:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA14DCE129 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:46:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1619732914.19485.1305647209693.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1240879157.4951.1300837565772.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7206) Integrate Snappy compression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034829#comment-13034829 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7206: ----------------------------------- I actually think that, long-term, Snappy compression belongs in Hadoop, along with the other compression codecs. The hadoop-snappy project is a useful stopgap until we get regular releases going again, and it allows other projects like HBase to use Snappy in the meantime. > Integrate Snappy compression > ---------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7206 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7206 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Attachments: HADOOP-7206.patch > > > Google release Zippy as an open source (APLv2) project called Snappy (http://code.google.com/p/snappy). This tracks integrating it into Hadoop. > {quote} > Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, Snappy compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14997-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 16:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14B234CF7 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49309 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 16:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49268 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 16:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49260 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 16:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933FBCEB30 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1434765246.19531.1305648947599.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-7296: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Siddharth Seth Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks, Siddharth! > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14998-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 16:34:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC2747FF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79823 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79705 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79696 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D27CD351 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <824661406.19623.1305650027790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034862#comment-13034862 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7296: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #605 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/605/]) HADOOP-7296. The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit. Contributed by Siddharth Seth > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-14999-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 17:39:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D869D487D for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15553 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:39:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15519 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:39:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15511 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 17:39:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:39:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:39:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58619CEE16 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <199428749.19856.1305653927358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7282: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: ipc Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15000-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 17:45:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 344BC4DCC for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25115 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25083 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25075 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:45:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586BACE017 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <908680369.19867.1305654287358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7282: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I have committed this. Thanks, John! > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15001-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 18:04:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40CF14AD8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61328 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 18:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61297 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 18:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61283 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 18:04:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:04:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDE7CE71E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <588371746.19922.1305655427516.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034923#comment-13034923 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #606 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/606/]) HADOOP-7282. ipc.Server.getRemoteIp() may return null. Contributed by John George > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15002-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 19:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF35F49B6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10401 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 19:58:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10361 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 19:58:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10353 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 19:58:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581DFCE4D1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1102218377.20250.1305662267357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035009#comment-13035009 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- Hey Sanjay. I'm trying to follow this patch. Is the change to getHomeDirectory in ViewFileSystem just for the sake of the tests? > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15003-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 21:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 595114133 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16242 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 21:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16197 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 21:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16189 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 21:42:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:42:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A58CE0AF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1381606410.20720.1305668507458.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035080#comment-13035080 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Good question. Yes and no. If you recall, when I did FileContext and AbstractFileSystem, the home directory came from the server side. Our current default of /user/ is used for FileSystem since it has no notion of a server defaults. Enter Viewfs -- there is no notion of a server side. Also a viewfs could have mount points to different file systems; so I can't pick the ss defaults for home directory from any one of them. This hit home when i tried to run the tests because the mac and linux and hdfs have different home directory pathname. SO the test exposed a real problem in the system design by the fact that our tests run on different platforms and hence different file systems. I haven't figured out what is the cleanest way to fix this (but I give a suggestion below that I will file as a jira). The intermediate solution is that the person configuring the view file system will create a mount point for /user or /Users etc depending on what he wants as the default home dir. So I simply coded a rule in viewfilesystem impl, for now, to see if it has mount point of /user or /Users etc, till we figure out a better solution. Here is proposal on which I am going to shortly file a jira: let the viewfs config indicate the home directory. In a sense it is like a SS default. Should this simply be a key in the config or something else (like pick it up from a hdfs?) I could have made the tests work by simply not using a mount point and test path starting with "/user" or "/Users" but then it does not test our most common usecase. BTW I plan to add a test to HDFS also. " > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15004-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 17 21:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 391554175 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18363 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18326 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18318 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B68CCE1DF for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1659602871.20725.1305668627436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035081#comment-13035081 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7296: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #50 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/50/]) Merge -r 1104373:1104374 from trunk to branch-0.22. Fixes: HADOOP-7296 tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1104377 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/permission/TestFsPermission.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/permission/FsPermission.java > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15005-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 05:22:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E5A76A6A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62604 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62397 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62360 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 05:22:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:22:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB2CCE2E6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 05:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests ------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7298 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: test Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15006-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 05:25:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 091C56AEC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65747 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:25:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65716 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:25:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65703 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 05:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5CDCE454 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 05:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1381772830.21513.1305696287509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035202#comment-13035202 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7298: ------------------------------------- The HBase class lives here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/MultithreadedTestUtil.java For an example usage, see testLABThreading in the following test: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/TestMemStoreLAB.java > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15007-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 05:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CB0692A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82106 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81858 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 05:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81839 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 05:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D234CEE0D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 05:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 05:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2113872824.21549.1305697547574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7298: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7298.txt Cleaned up the hbase utility a bit and added test cases for the test utility. I think this will make a nice building block to build some stress/fuzz tests for the namenode for HDFS-988. But, no need to commit it until such a test is ready. > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15008-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 07:21:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41A9C6060 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67473 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67253 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67207 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 07:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8AFCFAB8 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1095760346.21644.1305703247908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15009-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 07:21:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54EFD6062 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67479 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67281 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67208 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 07:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE56BCFABA for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <532212030.21646.1305703247973.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15010-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 07:21:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D39D6066 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67566 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67373 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67202 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 07:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8942CFAB4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1941584114.21640.1305703247753.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash3.patch Minor fix - removal of a warning, > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15011-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 07:33:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0387F63E6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77232 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:33:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77079 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 07:33:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77040 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 07:33:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:33:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:33:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58FCCFE44 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:32:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <535597598.21656.1305703972805.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035226#comment-13035226 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479557/trash3.patch against trunk revision 1104426. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/466//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/466//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/466//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15012-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 08:36:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A77663E5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31070 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 08:36:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31023 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 08:36:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31015 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 08:36:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:36:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:36:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB65CF511 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 08:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:35:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1459392622.21718.1305707750564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035235#comment-13035235 ] Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on HADOOP-7208: --------------------------------------------- Sorry for the delay in replying and patch preparation. We may need this change if we use our custom StandardSocketFactory In the equals method if we change the implementation like return obj.getClass().getName().equals(this.getClass().getName()); It gives a findbug error. Is it fine ? is there any way to get approval for the same. > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15013-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 09:38:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A3426392 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86510 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86478 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86470 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA606CF873 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1418311642.21786.1305711467694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035249#comment-13035249 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- checking by classname is wrong because if you have >1 classloader you can have multiple classes with the name -even singleton classes. Better to use this.getClass().equals(that.getClass()) For a real review you really need to attach the patch > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15014-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 10:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42DA96216 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63138 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 10:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63106 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 10:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63096 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 10:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:22:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A74BCF84E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vitalii Tymchyshyn (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <572963958.21860.1305714107432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7299) FSOutputSummer do not flushBuffer on OutputStream.flush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 FSOutputSummer do not flushBuffer on OutputStream.flush ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7299 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7299 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Vitalii Tymchyshyn When working with "file://" FileSystem (e.g. in tests), ChecksumFileSystem is used. I am calling next operations: create write hflush open seek read This results in: java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.io.IOException: Cannot seek after EOF at com.dbl.util.grid.apache.hdfs.FileSystemStorageHolder.get(FileSystemStorageHolder.java:52) at com.dbl.util.grid.apache.hdfs.FileSystemStorageTest.testRecursiveSave(FileSystemStorageTest.java:31) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:130) at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:97) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:192) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:60) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:115) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Cannot seek after EOF at org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.seek(ChecksumFileSystem.java:296) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSDataInputStream.seek(FSDataInputStream.java:42) at com.dbl.util.grid.apache.hdfs.FileSystemStorageHolder.get(FileSystemStorageHolder.java:49) ... 26 more It seems that FSOutputSummer does not implements flush OutputStream method - so hflush gets ignored. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15015-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 11:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F8566EA0 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52620 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52561 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52553 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 11:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC16CEE1F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1545486769.21979.1305717227904.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1326019706.17705.1305599027427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7296) The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035293#comment-13035293 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7296: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #692 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/692/]) HADOOP-7296. The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit. Contributed by Siddharth Seth tomwhite : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1104374 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/permission/FsPermission.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/permission/TestFsPermission.java > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor does not use the sticky bit > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7296 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Siddharth Seth > Assignee: Siddharth Seth > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP7296.patch, HADOOP7296_2.patch > > > The FsPermission(FsPermission) constructor copies u, g, o from the supplied FsPermission object but ignores the sticky bit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15016-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 11:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9746B6EBC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53211 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53179 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53171 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 11:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0405CEE14 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1630415618.21973.1305717227718.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <903601160.6842.1305210828211.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7282) getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035292#comment-13035292 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7282: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #692 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/692/]) HADOOP-7282. ipc.Server.getRemoteIp() may return null. Contributed by John George szetszwo : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1104426 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java > getRemoteIp could return null in cases where the call is ongoing but the ip went away. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7282 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7282 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Reporter: John George > Assignee: John George > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7282-1.patch, HADOOP-7282.patch, diffs.txt > > > getRemoteIp gets the ip from socket instead of the stored ip in Connection object. Thus calls to this function could return null when a client disconnected, but the rpc call is still ongoing... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15017-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 11:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CC836D93 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83715 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:34:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83655 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:34:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83647 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 11:34:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19F8CF618 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <769112774.22011.1305718428855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035300#comment-13035300 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch/49/]) > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15018-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 11:34:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDCED6E06 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85259 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:34:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85209 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 11:34:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85193 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 11:34:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:34:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4559DCF654 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1085297702.22058.1305718431280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035309#comment-13035309 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch #49 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch/49/]) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15019-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 12:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DE006EF3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 12:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13917 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 12:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13881 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 12:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13873 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 12:42:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 12:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 12:42:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C512CF1DC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 12:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <733356005.22201.1305722507440.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6238437.286071293099061858.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7076) Splittable Gzip MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7076: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7076-2011-05-18.patch This patch has no code changes compared to the previous one. Only the Javadoc has been improved to provide additional suggestions for optimal usage of this patch. > Splittable Gzip > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7076 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7076 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Attachments: HADOOP-7076-2011-01-26.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-01-29.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-02-05.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-02-06.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-05-18.patch, HADOOP-7076.patch > > > Files compressed with the gzip codec are not splittable due to the nature of the codec. > This limits the options you have scaling out when reading large gzipped input files. > Given the fact that gunzipping a 1GiB file usually takes only 2 minutes I figured that for some use cases wasting some resources may result in a shorter job time under certain conditions. > So reading the entire input file from the start for each split (wasting resources!!) may lead to additional scalability. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15020-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 13:04:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30E9E6038 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62881 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 13:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62857 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 13:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62849 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 13:04:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:04:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA8CF9A4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 13:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <185548080.22241.1305723827388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6238437.286071293099061858.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7076) Splittable Gzip MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035355#comment-13035355 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7076: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479577/HADOOP-7076-2011-05-18.patch against trunk revision 1104426. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 5 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/467//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/467//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/467//console This message is automatically generated. > Splittable Gzip > --------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7076 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7076 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Attachments: HADOOP-7076-2011-01-26.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-01-29.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-02-05.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-02-06.patch, HADOOP-7076-2011-05-18.patch, HADOOP-7076.patch > > > Files compressed with the gzip codec are not splittable due to the nature of the codec. > This limits the options you have scaling out when reading large gzipped input files. > Given the fact that gunzipping a 1GiB file usually takes only 2 minutes I figured that for some use cases wasting some resources may result in a shorter job time under certain conditions. > So reading the entire input file from the start for each split (wasting resources!!) may lead to additional scalability. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15021-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 14:32:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30FBC6FAE for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1506 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 14:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1469 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 14:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1461 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 14:32:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8C3CFF71 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <528970851.22443.1305729108182.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-5342) DataNodes do not start up because InconsistentFSStateException on just part of the disks in use MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035405#comment-13035405 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HADOOP-5342: ------------------------------------------------ I would like to suggest Pls correct me if am wrong namespace id is getting updated immediately after one of the disks of the dfs.data.dir got updated. instead update the namespace id after parsing all the dfs.data.dir storage directories > DataNodes do not start up because InconsistentFSStateException on just part of the disks in use > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.2 > Reporter: Christian Kunz > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Critical > > After restarting a cluster (including rebooting) the dfs got corrupted because many DataNodes did not start up, running into the following exception: > 2009-02-26 22:33:53,774 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode: org.apache.hadoop.dfs.InconsistentFSStateException: Directory xxx is in an inconsistent state: version file in current directory is missing. > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.Storage$StorageDirectory.analyzeStorage(Storage.java:326) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataStorage.recoverTransitionRead(DataStorage.java:105) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:306) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.(DataNode.java:223) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:3030) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:2985) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:2993) > at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:3115) > This happens when using multiple disks with at least one previously marked as read-only, such that the storage version became out-dated, but after reboot it was mounted read-write, resulting in the DataNode not starting because of out-dated version. > This is a big headache. If a DataNode has multiple disks of which at least one has the correct storage version then out-dated versions should not bring down the DataNode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15022-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 15:21:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74CD563BF for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90919 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90880 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90810 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 15:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD682CF578 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1078508724.22597.1305732047706.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15023-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 15:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 405046692 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4567 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4474 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4466 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 15:29:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:29:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:29:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6040ACF97E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <177203204.22625.1305732527390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15024-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 15:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E25EC6F30 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34282 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34249 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 15:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34241 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 15:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7C9CFFCC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430437559.22668.1305733367387.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035447#comment-13035447 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7256: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479607/HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch against trunk revision 1104426. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/468//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/468//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/468//console This message is automatically generated. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15025-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:37:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F012664F1 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35623 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35591 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35580 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2600CCFC89 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <537424235.22918.1305740208152.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15026-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:37:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2422D6506 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35952 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35921 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35892 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C874FCFC7F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1460248525.22908.1305740207817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers reassigned HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15027-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:37:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D404650D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36005 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35924 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35893 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60D8CFC7A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <64862320.22903.1305740207676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7121: ----------------------------------- Assignee: (was: Todd Lipcon) > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15028-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:51:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 902B86F23 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68228 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68202 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68186 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:51:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7257CF2D7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <371640206.22983.1305741047812.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Description: The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. (was: JAVA_HOME can be set in hadoop-env.sh and hadoop-config.sh should respect this. hadoop-config will source hadoop-env after it determines a config directory. If JAVA_HOME still isn't set, it will try to guess one from a list of Linux usual locations. If one still isn't set it will quit with a verbose error message.) Priority: Minor (was: Major) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20.2) Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Assignee: Eli Collins (was: Chad Metcalf) Summary: Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config (was: Improve JAVA_HOME detection and handling in hadoop-config) > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15029-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D055611B for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79639 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79607 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79591 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68729CF50C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7300 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15031-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2C8C6138 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80236 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80166 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80007 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7453CF51B for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <875275556.23023.1305741287878.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15030-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 440CD6155 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80176 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80111 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79943 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58D0CF519 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <770000035.23021.1305741287806.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7300.txt > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15032-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2D82616D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80371 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80327 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80247 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8686FCF50F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1941619250.23012.1305741287547.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6605-1.patch Patch attached. Implements the behavior in the (updated) description. It detects Java for a number of different version of java (Linux platform default, Sun Java)on a couple different host types (Linux, Mac, tar install). It looks for Sun Java first since Hadoop currently requires Sun java. This list can be updated for other host types (eg add /usr/local for Solaris). > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15033-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 17:59:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C5B76316 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85966 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85938 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 17:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85930 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 17:59:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:59:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:59:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC1DCF730 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1645019806.23050.1305741527905.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035524#comment-13035524 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention testing, since the unit tests don't cover this. I verified with this change that: # JAVA_HOME if set in conf/hadoop-env.sh takes precedence over the term env and this detection # JAVA_HOME if set by the term env takes precedence over this detection # JAVA_HOME is now detected if installed w/o being set explicitly, and errs out if none is detected > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15034-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:01:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F5E76B58 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90195 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90148 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90103 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:01:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDFDCF8A7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15035-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:11:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 388D96BFD for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12367 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12333 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12321 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:11:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746BCCFCB3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <71593733.23105.1305742247473.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035535#comment-13035535 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7300: --------------------------------------- +1 > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15036-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 561326E76 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21862 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21832 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21824 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C64CFE4C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1057171311.23120.1305742487667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh updated HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7301.patch > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15037-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E8426E84 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22069 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22019 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21909 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D1ACFE49 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1977164801.23117.1305742487589.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035537#comment-13035537 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Allen raised some good questions earlier... bq. Why doesn't this try the java that is the path? I assume you mean that if java is in the path it could infer JAVA_HOME by looking at the parent of the containing directory. That's reasonable, think it would make sense to do this in addition to looking in standard locations (since we do care about the java we're looking for). If you feel strongly I can incorporate that into this change. bq. Why doesn't this verify that $JAVA_HOME/bin/java actually works? I think it's OK to assume that the java installed in java home works. bq. Shouldn't it verify that it found JDK6 or better? That would be a good improvement, it also needs to check for Sun-compatible Java since Hadoop currently depends on Sun-specific classes. Let's handle this in a separate jira. bq. Why is the error message RH-based specific? Heck, why have the "please download" message at all? You're right, it shouldn't be. The latest patch is just a sligh modification to the current error message. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15038-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:17:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94026666D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25416 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25373 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25365 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8386CFF5C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1490420586.23145.1305742608882.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch Patch for trunk which addresses the issue. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15040-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 307B7668D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25709 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25629 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25611 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50ACFF64 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1001885976.23151.1305742609252.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh updated HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15039-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FCF3668B for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25694 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25627 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25612 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:17:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37848CFF63 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1711964526.23150.1305742609224.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15041-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:17:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EB9866BF for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26157 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26123 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26115 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:17:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:17:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E6CFF4E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <319470067.23140.1305742608710.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh reassigned HADOOP-7301: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15042-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42965637C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32789 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32758 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32749 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:23:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9091CCF223 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1593391.23183.1305742967588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035545#comment-13035545 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------- This looks good. Can you run Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest to check that it works against real S3? You can set credentials in src/test/core-site.xml. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15043-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:27:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 398D766D9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41406 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41370 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41362 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E16CF41A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <686872308.23199.1305743207545.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035549#comment-13035549 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7287: ------------------------------------- This seems fairly reasonable. I think since this is such a central part of the code, we should make sure to run the HDFS and MR tests against the patched Common jar. Would you mind doing that and posting results? > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15044-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52C4B66EA for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41654 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41620 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41612 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D129CF410 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <635738882.23193.1305743207377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035548#comment-13035548 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7300: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479625/hadoop-7300.txt against trunk revision 1104426. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/469//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/469//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/469//console This message is automatically generated. > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15045-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C34268B8 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50859 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:33:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50709 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:33:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50701 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:33:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FADCF74C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <280634606.23240.1305743567410.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk and 0.22. Thanks for the quick review, Chris! > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15046-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:33:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51E20691A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52275 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52230 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52216 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA97CF750 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <137836695.23244.1305743567564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035557#comment-13035557 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7215: ----------------------------------- Can this be closed? Looks like it's been committed. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2xx.patch, HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15047-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:37:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B99106EF6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64071 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:37:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64034 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:37:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64026 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:37:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:37:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:37:33 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46D8CF98E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1232343467.23266.1305743812931.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6846: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15048-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 951546163 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73541 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73498 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73490 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F0ACFC2A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <555449440.23326.1305744047799.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7205: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) This dupes HADOOP-6605, which handles java detection via looking for specific, standard java home's for various versions of Java (which may be used across OS types) rather than use an os-specific detection method (java_home in OSX). Agree with Allen that we avoid OS-specific changes when possible. There are places which care about host-specific and java-specific issues and these may require some host-specific/java-specific changes. > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15049-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBCE76171 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73772 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73725 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73584 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AE8CFC2C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1638444830.23328.1305744047863.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2109891895.4306.1300818846044.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7205) automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins closed HADOOP-7205. ------------------------------- > automatically determine JAVA_HOME on OS X > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7205 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7205 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7205.patch > > > OS X provides a java_home command that will return the user's selected jvm. The hadoop-env.sh should use this command if JAVA_HOME is not set. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15050-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57CB61E2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81462 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81425 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81410 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE8FCFDD6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1067055985.23343.1305744167717.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035572#comment-13035572 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479630/hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch against trunk revision 1124368. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/470//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/470//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/470//console This message is automatically generated. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15051-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C8F6614 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86580 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86544 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:45:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86535 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:45:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:45:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:45:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607CCCFE9C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <476313231.23349.1305744287391.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035573#comment-13035573 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #607 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/607/]) HADOOP-7300. Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124368 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfiguration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/StringUtils.java > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15052-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:49:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53225696D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94481 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94441 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94431 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A05CFFD3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <443059034.23356.1305744527523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035575#comment-13035575 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7287: ---------------------------------------- bq. I think since this is such a central part of the code, we should make sure to run the HDFS and MR tests against the patched Common jar. Would you mind doing that and posting results? Happy to. This is presently underway. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15053-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 18:53:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2354F6C36 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4905 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4861 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4824 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F02CF1B2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1378165525.23378.1305744767561.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035578#comment-13035578 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ Why this shouldn't be in a one-time setup script rather than executed on *every* hadoop invocation? Are we going to bastardized all of the scripts to deal with all of the other OS inconsistencies? I'm definitely -1 at this point. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15054-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 19:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DF296F43 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55984 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55957 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55949 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 19:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD9CFEA3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1845541919.23475.1305746567483.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh updated HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15055-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 19:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 972ED6016 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62016 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61978 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61966 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 19:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72C2CF134 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1614608559.23510.1305746807812.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035606#comment-13035606 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- bq. Why this shouldn't be in a one-time setup script rather than executed on every hadoop invocation? Because the java installation may change between invocations, eg you may eg install java between invocations of the hadoop command, or you may remove one java installation and then install a new one and you don't want the old one (which is no longer present) cached anywhere. Eg # exec hadoop # fails due to lack of java # yum install java-xyz # exec hadoop # now picks up java This detection only kicks in if JAVA_HOME is not explicitly set elsewhere, if you want to always use a particular version of java, just set JAVA_HOME. Any remaining technical objection? > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15056-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 19:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9E66870 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68150 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68107 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68099 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 19:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB4FCF2D6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1192415109.23517.1305747047573.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035609#comment-13035609 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- -1: Only in that I don't like the logic as it would apply to OS X, but I do really like the concept. Minor point is /Library/Java/Home was deprecated in 10.5 in favor of /usr/libexec/java_home. Ignoring that, if for some reason I had a copy of java in any of the myriad of directories listed prior to /Library/Java/Home, then this patch will pick that (wrong) version of java, instead of the one I set in "Java Preferences". > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15057-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 19:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2651C6B24 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92832 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92800 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92792 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 19:43:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:43:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F47CF733 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1564799358.23539.1305747767410.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035614#comment-13035614 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479628/hadoop-7301.patch against trunk revision 1124368. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/471//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/471//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/471//console This message is automatically generated. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15058-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 19:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E56161B5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4406 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4380 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 19:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4372 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 19:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD51CFA7D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <82011012.23571.1305748247635.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035619#comment-13035619 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Thanks for the feedback Daryn. It looks like /usr/libexec/java_home is the right method for newer Mac systems as the paths it returns is not very generic (in the way the others are), eg has particular dot version numbers in the name. How about, if /usr/libexec/java_home is present, the path it returns is put in the list before /Library/Java/Home? This should work for both older and newer versions of OS X. I could remove /Library/Java/Home from the current version of the patch and we could do that as a change that applies atop this one (I don't have a Mac) or I could make this change as part of this patch and you could try it for me? (As an aside, I'm surprised -1s are coming out on rev 1 of a patch, we normally we go back and forth on the review before veto'ing a patch, ie if there are technical objections that are not addressed in subsequent versions. I will try to address any technical objections raised). > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15059-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39E856AE2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23680 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23655 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23647 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A72FCF0BA for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <128632698.23611.1305749087563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035626#comment-13035626 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7301: ------------------------------------- Let's add a comment similar to the one FSDataOutputStream#getWrappredStream. Otherwise looks good. {noformat} // Returns the underlying output stream. This is used by unit tests. {noformat} > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15060-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:09:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96A626B60 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25600 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25575 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25567 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921DDCF2B7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <960437402.23641.1305749327595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-6832: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Todd Lipcon (was: Owen O'Malley) I will update Owen's patch > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15061-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:11:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9EE86C81 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35968 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35911 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:11:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35702 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:11:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:11:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE295CF46F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <937581138.23651.1305749447906.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jonathan Hsieh updated HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7301.2.patch updated to add requested comment. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15062-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:19:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6470C61C9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63695 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63532 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63256 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82314CF9C1 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <121020826.23681.1305749927530.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035639#comment-13035639 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7301: ------------------------------------- +1 > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15063-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:19:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7153261DD for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63733 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63646 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63425 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:19:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9E4CF9C7 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <294975823.23686.1305749927699.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7301: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this. Thanks Jon! > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15064-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:23:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2ADA6B0D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83086 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83033 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82999 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8910CFBD3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1284150474.23711.1305750167883.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035645#comment-13035645 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7301: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479641/hadoop-7301.2.patch against trunk revision 1124368. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/472//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/472//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/472//console This message is automatically generated. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15065-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:35:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F35D6191 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94876 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94838 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94830 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B1CD0148 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <237053536.23743.1305750887790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-6832: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Owen O'Malley (was: Todd Lipcon) > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15066-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:35:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABA74619F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95108 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95071 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94921 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ACED014B for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <959392417.23746.1305750887876.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035650#comment-13035650 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6832: --------------------------------------- I forgot about this one. I'll go ahead and do it. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15067-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:35:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A198C61CC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95779 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95747 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95735 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B28D0142 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <796130917.23739.1305750887622.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035649#comment-13035649 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7301: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #608 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/608/]) HADOOP-7301. FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method. Contributed by Jonathan Hsieh eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124406 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataInputStream.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSMainOperationsBaseTest.java > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15068-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8A076623 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7095 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7054 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7046 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:39:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:39:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83490D02E9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <582937045.23758.1305751127534.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035652#comment-13035652 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6832: --------------------------------------- Actually, looking back, since it is already committed to 0.20.203.0, let's go ahead and commit this to trunk and file a new jira. Does that make sense Todd? > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15069-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA4B6732 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10264 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10191 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10183 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DF1D04AC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <226726444.23789.1305751367627.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035654#comment-13035654 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ java_home is not a stable interface. It cannot be trusted to last, especially given the question marks that hang over Java on OS X. I'm -1 for a variety of reasons: a) we're getting into platform specific code without a good reason b) this could have significant performance ramifications as we add more and more paths to support more and more OSes c) there is a config option to specifically eliminate the need to do this > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15070-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:51:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 948F66F17 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22505 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22467 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22459 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0FCD076D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <121278988.23830.1305751847578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035659#comment-13035659 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- bq. a) we're getting into platform specific code without a good reason The motivation is that users don't shouldn't have to manually set an environment variable that we can detect automatically. Multiple users have requested this. Why is this not a good reason? We make improvements both for new users (who want an easier out of the box experience) and experienced admins (who will manually configure HADOOP_HOME). bq. b) this could have significant performance ramifications as we add more and more paths to support more and more OSes How so? The new code *only* executes if HADOOP_HOME is not already set, and the code just checks for the existence of bin/java in a set of directories, it bails as soon as it finds one. This is not an expensive operation. bq. c) there is a config option to specifically eliminate the need to do this The existence of a configuration parameter does not mean we're not allowed to try to detect a reasonable default if it's not set. We also automatically set a default MAX_HEAP_SIZE and let users override it, this is not different. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15071-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 20:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A81B6FBF for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25603 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25565 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 20:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25557 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 20:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AB4D0855 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <748905583.23844.1305751967818.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035662#comment-13035662 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6832: ------------------------------------- Actually nearly complete with the new patch for trunk. Since this was committed to 203 even though it hadn't been +1ed here, I don't see why that should hold this back from being fixed. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15072-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:07:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73A4369C4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47553 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47527 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47518 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F819D0D06 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <442145780.23882.1305752807650.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035669#comment-13035669 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- (My apologies on the neg. I thought no number meant "I have general concerns but it's ok if someone else +1s", whereas -1 meant "I think there's something really wrong I want addressed" as in the path handling.) Personally, I don't think it's too messy if hadoop knows how to make a few reasonable guesses, based on conventions, for a few common OSes if JAVA_HOME isn't already set. The tiny performance impact is only taken by those that chose to not set JAVA_HOME. Something like the following could be used to restrict the search path for the appropriate os. {code} case "$(uname -s)" in Darwin) candidates=($(/usr/libexec/java_home) /Library/Java/Home) ;; Windows) candidates=(...no idea...) ;; Linux) candidates=(/usr/java/default /usr/lib/jvm/default-java ...) ... ;; esac {code} > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15073-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:07:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB9A069E0 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48004 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:07:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47980 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47972 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:07:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034B6D0D11 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <393793425.23893.1305752808010.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035671#comment-13035671 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6962: -------------------------------------- This breaks compatibility. That's a big deal. BTW are the semantics different for localfs and hdfs? > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15074-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:17:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB366975 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70122 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:17:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70077 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:17:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70047 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:17:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:17:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:17:34 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD28CF161 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:16:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <11194223.23953.1305753414565.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035679#comment-13035679 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- bq. java_home is not a stable interface. It cannot be trusted to last, especially given the question marks that hang over Java on OS X. This is not true. Apple engineers tell devs on their java-dev list to use java_home. The following technote says to use java_home. The utility was added in part so future non-system provided jvms don't monkey with system controlled directories. http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1170/_index.html > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15075-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A70A866DB for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80806 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80759 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80751 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC19CF4DD for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1546407342.23991.1305753767700.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035686#comment-13035686 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ I'm sure that would remain true if Apple was still going to supply the JVM. Given that the responsibility has shifted to Oracle, all bets are off. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15076-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9A7866EC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81036 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80987 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80966 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBCACF4E5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1834833382.23997.1305753767896.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035687#comment-13035687 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7301: ------------------------------------------------ Hi, new public method needs javadoc. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15077-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58F21698F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94846 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94807 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94799 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA268CF77E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <611716361.24038.1305754007693.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035694#comment-13035694 ] Jonathan Hsieh commented on HADOOP-7301: ---------------------------------------- Nicholas, The patch seems to be committed now. Let me know how you would like me to proceed: (new patch? incremental patch? new jira?) Jon. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15078-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:31:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2EA16236 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8558 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8498 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8485 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:31:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89BDCF9F9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1810925148.24071.1305754247752.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035697#comment-13035697 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6962: ------------------------------------- Hadoop's mkdirs used to follow posix and create dirs with correct permissions, but the semantics were broken sometime after 0.20.9. Yes, currently the semantics differ for localfs (follows posix) and hdfs (does not). This patch restores posix compliance for hdfs mkdirs. > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15079-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:37:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4537A6273 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27874 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27833 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27819 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:37:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:37:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2E4CFE2F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:36:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1062156855.24116.1305754608497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035702#comment-13035702 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7301: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Jon, either reverting the committed patch and reopening this, or fixing it in a new jira is fine. Thanks for the fast response. > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15080-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98D4D642A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40036 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40012 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40004 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89509D01E9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1999246873.24177.1305754967559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035708#comment-13035708 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #51 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/51/]) HADOOP-7300. Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124370 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/StringUtils.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfiguration.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15081-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:45:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 229EB692F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44052 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44023 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44011 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:45:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:45:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6573DD0285 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <989471619.24181.1305755087411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6832.patch Adds the configuration variable and makes it part of the default list. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15082-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2228E6B77 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50898 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50872 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50856 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:49:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767B4D05BE for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <787799661.24190.1305755327481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6832.patch Forgot to use the default user. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15083-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 21:49:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C75226BA3 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51616 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51569 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 21:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51557 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 21:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF512D05C9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <759197849.24200.1305755327777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6832: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6832.txt Patch similar to Owen's but with some improvements: - doesn't rely on static variables to configure the static user - adds unit tests - documents the new configuration > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15084-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:07:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B1068F2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88563 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88539 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88529 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA665CF517 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <495008496.24288.1305756407825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035778#comment-13035778 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7137: ------------------------------------- Just removed contrib/hod from Jira and add to the Attic wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Attic > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15085-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:15:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F7816B8E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98219 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98187 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98179 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D202CF952 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <368080761.24327.1305756887443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035786#comment-13035786 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7287: ---------------------------------------- HDFS tests which failed: org.apache.hadoop.tools.TestJMXGet org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestBlocksWithNotEnoughRacks org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDecommission org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDatanodeBlockScanner org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestHDFSTrash All of which, I believe, are known to be flaky or failing. I was able to run TestBlocksWithNotEnoughRacks, TestDecommission, and TestDatanodeBlockScanner individually, and they passed. Running the M/R tests now. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15086-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3876A621A for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10367 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10335 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:23:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10327 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:23:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:23:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7722ECFE07 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <746180913.24396.1305757367484.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035797#comment-13035797 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7137: ------------------------------------- Oops, I mean I closed as won't fix all the hod Jira's. I didn't actually removed the Jira component. > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15087-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4A3762B4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13531 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13488 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13480 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8E8D002D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <135654339.24421.1305757607712.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Attachment: h-6832.patch thanks for the test case, todd. incorporated todd's suggestions, although i'm not wild about doing the username lookup for each request. The default user is already in the code and doesn't need to be in the configuration file too. Using a non-unix userid means the chance for false positives is much lower. Besides, dr. who is fun. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15088-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5746C6549 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19840 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19813 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19805 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87852D0161 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1055691373.24444.1305757727552.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035804#comment-13035804 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6832: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479664/hadoop-6832.txt against trunk revision 1124406. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/473//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/473//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/473//console This message is automatically generated. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15089-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A91416D07 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25057 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25018 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25006 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBD8D01FA for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <748675750.24459.1305757848507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch A patch to also remove HOD english docs. > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15090-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66BD16603 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26450 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26412 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26404 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:33:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:33:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E151D0261 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2056810736.24467.1305757967578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035808#comment-13035808 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6832: ------------------------------------- bq. incorporated todd's suggestions, although i'm not wild about doing the username lookup for each request. What do you mean by "username lookup" here? The conf lookup only happens when the HttpServer starts. The "new User()" construction does happen for every request, but that's hardly heavy lifting (eg we do the same thing on every RPC) bq. The default user is already in the code and doesn't need to be in the configuration file too. The same could be said for every other default throughout all of common, HDFS, and MR, no? This is our status quo. bq. Using a non-unix userid means the chance for false positives is much lower. Besides, dr. who is fun. Apparently most of our very-confused customers who've filed tickets about this don't agree. To quote one operator: {noformat} One thing I'd like to add is the fact that DrWho.Tardis are the default user.group for Hadoop is horrible and confusing. For my $0.02 on this as a sys-admin I want a useful error message that doesn't make me go digging though the Hadoop Jira for 15 minutes {noformat} > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15091-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:37:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 785736B7E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35310 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35261 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35253 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217BD037E for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <87781171.24477.1305758207726.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035810#comment-13035810 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6962: ------------------------------------- bq. the semantics were broken sometime after 0.20.9 What is 0.20.9? > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15092-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B250A6C39 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42330 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42298 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42288 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F87D04CE for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1919470452.24499.1305758447934.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035815#comment-13035815 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7137: ------------------------------------- +1 I built and verified the generated docs. > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15093-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 22:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8362D6FDC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46591 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46545 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46532 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A3DD0628 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <441095169.24523.1305758687736.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins closed HADOOP-7137. ------------------------------- I've committed this to branch 22 and trunk. Thanks Nigel! > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15094-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:01:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B17596DAB for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68502 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:01:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68434 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:01:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68374 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:01:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:01:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1AFD0C10 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1916735165.24590.1305759647840.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035829#comment-13035829 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6832: --------------------------------------- {quote} What do you mean by "username lookup" here? {quote} {code} + this.username = conf.getInitParameter(USERNAME_KEY); + this.user = new User(username); {code} I agree it isn't huge, which is why I left it in, but it also isn't adding any value. {quote} The same could be said for every other default throughout all of common, HDFS, and MR, no? {quote} No, actually. We do it in a lot of places, but it leads to lots of confusion. Furthermore, this isn't a framework default, but a plugin default. I don't think it is appropriate to put into the default configuration file. {quote} Apparently most of our very-confused customers who've filed tickets about this don't agree. {quote} The issue isn't the default value of "dr.who". Having a magic value of "webuser" will have *exactly* the same problem with trying to figure out where it is coming from. Furthermore, if they *actually* have a real *webuser* account, it could create problems. I guess we could use "default.web.user" or something. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15095-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:07:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B27536CC2 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76348 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76310 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76302 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169D6D0F50 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1162391771.24670.1305760008089.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15096-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:07:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A26646CE5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76970 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:07:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76920 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76836 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:07:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F76D0F46 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <624032516.24660.1305760007738.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15097-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 435686F4D for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26780 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26746 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26738 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D918D095C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ari Rabkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org webinterface.private.actions should not be in common ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7302 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Ari Rabkin Assignee: Ari Rabkin Fix For: 0.23.0 The comment in -defaults says that it applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15098-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 148506F8C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28576 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28545 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28537 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:43:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:43:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501B4D09ED for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ari Rabkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1477077700.24774.1305762167309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ari Rabkin updated HADOOP-7302: ------------------------------- Description: The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) was: The comment in -defaults says that it applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15099-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:49:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A2765CC for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37150 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37124 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37111 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647CFD0CAB for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2133591247.24822.1305762527408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6605-2.patch Updated patch attached. Incorporates Daryn's suggestion: builds the candidates array based on the OS type (Solaris, OSX and Linux). > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15100-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:53:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC410665F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42709 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:53:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42683 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42674 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:53:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:53:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:53:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A48D0D7C for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ari Rabkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1840560349.24836.1305762767339.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ari Rabkin updated HADOOP-7302: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7302.patch > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15101-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30B8766C9 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44025 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43989 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43981 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726ACD0E30 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ari Rabkin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1634536089.24838.1305762887465.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ari Rabkin updated HADOOP-7302: ------------------------------- Release Note: option webinterface.private.actions has been renamed to mapreduce.jobtracker.webinterface.trusted Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Note: no change to code, hence no tests. > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15102-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:55:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7831366D8 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44308 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44246 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44238 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:55:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53EFD0E37 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2138318482.24845.1305762887673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035867#comment-13035867 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6962: -------------------------------------- 20.09 is internal yahoo release -- at least on the internal release the semantics appeared to have changed. The internal Y! release does not matter to the larger Hadoop community except that he may have helped detect a problem. Main questions are: * Did the semantics change and if so accidentally or on purpose. * What is the right semantics? * Are we breaking compatibility if we change the behavior. I have always disliked the recursive mkdirs. > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15103-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 18 23:59:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2D167C6 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49656 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49633 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49625 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2011 23:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE8BD0F69 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1300358620.24880.1305763128316.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035873#comment-13035873 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6832: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479679/h-6832.patch against trunk revision 1124456. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/474//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/474//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/474//console This message is automatically generated. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15104-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 00:10:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87AD56F64 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62745 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:10:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62705 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62697 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 00:10:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7A2D03E1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1892687593.24913.1305763787891.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035877#comment-13035877 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6962: -------------------------------------- Daryn. There are 2 mkdirs methods. * The *static* FileSystem#mkdirs(fs, dir, permission) is very explicitly creating the dirs with the default and changing the permissions of the new leaf. This is not accidental. * the *non static* Filesystem#mkdirs is an abstract method. Raw local file system implements mkdirs as {code} public boolean mkdirs(Path f, FsPermission permission) throws IOException { boolean b = mkdirs(f); if(b) { setPermission(f, permission); } return b; } {code} > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15105-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 00:10:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15F1E6F8F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63396 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63355 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63347 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 00:10:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50E4D03E8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <916126225.24920.1305763788670.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035878#comment-13035878 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #609 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/609/]) HADOOP-7137. Remove hod contrib docs. Contributed by Nigel Daley eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124456 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hod_scheduler.xml > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15106-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 00:18:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 367B36F94 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73590 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73555 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 00:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73547 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 00:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A1FD064F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <709182728.24947.1305764267601.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035882#comment-13035882 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7287: ---------------------------------------- All of the M/R core tests passed. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15107-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 01:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DD1D61EA for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64006 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 01:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63968 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 01:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63960 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 01:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D72FD0F49 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1427281566.25234.1305769847510.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035926#comment-13035926 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7302: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479691/HADOOP-7302.patch against trunk revision 1124456. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/475//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/475//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/475//console This message is automatically generated. > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15108-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 03:03:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BFF84349 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22973 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 03:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22948 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 03:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22924 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 03:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68175D02E6 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1192476522.25400.1305774167423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt Though this fixes the test case, it doesn't deal with the case where the "new" key is being set as a default in one of the -default.xml files. This patch includes another test case that shows the issue. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15109-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 03:03:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C6704350 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23072 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 03:03:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22951 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 03:03:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22927 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 03:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52FFD02EC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 03:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <654578426.25405.1305774167673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15110-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 04:04:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 315894EDC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60644 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:04:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60392 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60324 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 04:04:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E96D0E8F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 04:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Warren (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <467412339.25463.1305777827557.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7303) 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 -------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7303 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7303 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Environment: MacOS 10.6 / Forrest 0.9 / Ant 1.8.2 / JDK 1.6 Reporter: James Warren The ant target "cn-docs" fails when using forrest 0.9. I did confirm that the build is fine using 0.8, and that the docs for HDFS and MAPREDUCE work with 0.9. I did not try using JDK5 due to HADOOP-7075. Will attach the stacktrace to this ticket - and I would appreciate confirmation of the bug as today was my first day using forrest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15111-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 04:06:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23E6F4F1C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62359 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62290 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62273 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 04:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:06:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8C6D0EFF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 04:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Warren (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <883633528.25466.1305777947367.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467412339.25463.1305777827557.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7303) 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Warren updated HADOOP-7303: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-common-forrest-0.9.log > 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7303 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7303 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Environment: MacOS 10.6 / Forrest 0.9 / Ant 1.8.2 / JDK 1.6 > Reporter: James Warren > Attachments: hadoop-common-forrest-0.9.log > > > The ant target "cn-docs" fails when using forrest 0.9. I did confirm that the build is fine using 0.8, and that the docs for HDFS and MAPREDUCE work with 0.9. I did not try using JDK5 due to HADOOP-7075. > Will attach the stacktrace to this ticket - and I would appreciate confirmation of the bug as today was my first day using forrest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15112-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 04:16:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CB1F44D8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65385 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65363 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 04:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65355 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 04:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45FBD00CB for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 04:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 04:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <217053580.25474.1305778547735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467412339.25463.1305777827557.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7303) 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13035973#comment-13035973 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7303: ------------------------------------- hrm... no idea there - maybe worth filing a forrest JIRA and linking the two? > 'docs' target incompatible with apache forrest 0.9 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7303 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7303 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Environment: MacOS 10.6 / Forrest 0.9 / Ant 1.8.2 / JDK 1.6 > Reporter: James Warren > Attachments: hadoop-common-forrest-0.9.log > > > The ant target "cn-docs" fails when using forrest 0.9. I did confirm that the build is fine using 0.8, and that the docs for HDFS and MAPREDUCE work with 0.9. I did not try using JDK5 due to HADOOP-7075. > Will attach the stacktrace to this ticket - and I would appreciate confirmation of the bug as today was my first day using forrest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15113-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 08:03:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E57944BC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38655 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:03:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38609 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38569 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 08:03:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9086DD02ED for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <307701012.26013.1305792167588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch Great catch, Todd, and thanks for providing the test case. I've attached an updated patch which addresses this issue. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15114-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 08:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BBA346CF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68841 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68681 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68619 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 08:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAE6D0CB1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1734226577.26045.1305793607629.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036062#comment-13036062 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------------- > Todd has said - Would it make sense to add these functions directly to the S3 filesystems but not to the overall API? I still see FileSystem.java change in the new patch. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15115-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 08:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A266D40D9 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87698 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87656 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 08:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87426 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 08:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A0DD04A8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 08:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1773866358.26074.1305794627527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1484131492.21509.1305696107453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7298) Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036068#comment-13036068 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7298: ----------------------------------------- Todd, given that this is a utility based on which tests are going to be written, can you add javadoc and possibly examples or brief description on how to use it. > Add test utility for writing multi-threaded tests > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7298 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7298.txt > > > A lot of our tests spawn off multiple threads in order to check various synchronization issues, etc. It's often tedious to write these kinds of tests because you have to manually propagate exceptions back to the main thread, etc. > In HBase we have developed a testing utility which makes writing these kinds of tests much easier. I'd like to copy that utility into Hadoop so we can use it here as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15116-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 09:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 556384652 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42581 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42550 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42541 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A75BD00F3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <397574138.26107.1305796307564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036072#comment-13036072 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7297: ----------------------------------------- namenode -checkpoint and backup nodes were added in 0.21 and they are not in 0.20.203 release. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15117-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 09:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0DC3465E for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42831 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42784 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42776 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 09:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA195D00FA for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <254790679.26113.1305796307824.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-7297. ------------------------------------- Resolution: Not A Problem I do not think this is a problem for 0.20.203. > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15118-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 09:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 360F64191 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65786 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65753 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65743 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 09:20:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABB6D0580 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1677465598.26135.1305796787368.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036081#comment-13036081 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7297: ------------------------------------------- Suresh - They are present in the docs, so one would think they exist in 203 as well. The docs surely ought to be fixed if these features are not present. (This since OP had posted a link that's 203 doc specific) > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15119-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 09:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5A3B4F22 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14436 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14408 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14400 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 09:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82BDD10FE for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <99460319.26200.1305798227751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036095#comment-13036095 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #52 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/52/]) HADOOP-7137. svn merge -c 1124456 from trunk eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124457 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hod_scheduler.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestSequenceFile.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15120-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 10:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D9524AC7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98017 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 10:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97979 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 10:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97968 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 10:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8883BD04B3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1738535981.26274.1305802127556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7304) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7304 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan Fix For: 0.20-append In our environment, Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls in 3days long run. Thread dump "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) Looks like same issue occurred in jetty also. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15121-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 10:49:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B23FF4B1B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99994 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 10:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99958 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 10:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99918 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 10:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CE2D04BC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1587045213.26279.1305802127688.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738535981.26274.1305802127556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7304) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7304: ------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.20-append > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7304 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20-append, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Fix For: 0.20-append > > > In our environment, Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls in 3days long run. > Thread dump > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like same issue occurred in jetty also. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15122-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 11:09:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 316864436 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25440 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 11:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25407 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 11:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25399 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 11:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D86D0B20 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <597712050.26292.1305803327364.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738535981.26274.1305802127556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7304) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7304: ------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: (was: 0.20-append) (was: 0.21.0) 0.23.0 Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20-append) > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7304 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > > In our environment, Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls in 3days long run. > Thread dump > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like same issue occurred in jetty also. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15123-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 12:11:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56A794C4A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27442 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27354 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27331 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:11:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:11:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB7FD107B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Eclipse project files are incomplete ------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7305 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Reporter: Niels Basjes Assignee: Niels Basjes Priority: Minor After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. At that point the following error appears: {quote} The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem {quote} The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15124-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 12:13:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 149AD4D0E for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35184 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:13:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35137 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34834 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:13:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9295D11BC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <922742944.26392.1305807167820.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7305: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch Add tools.jar to the classpath for the eclipse target in ant. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15125-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 12:13:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16AF54D59 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36859 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:13:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36827 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36819 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:13:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:13:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A158D11C4 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <903659163.26400.1305807168103.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niels Basjes updated HADOOP-7305: --------------------------------- Release Note: Added missing library during creation of the eclipse project files. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15126-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 12:33:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3984F4ADD for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66597 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66473 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66465 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5817BD1848 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1272668368.26448.1305808367357.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036149#comment-13036149 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7305: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479760/HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch against trunk revision 1124456. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/476//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/476//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/476//console This message is automatically generated. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15127-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 12:37:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44AF34038 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76390 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76220 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76212 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDF5D1A1F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Niels Basjes (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <187374403.26454.1305808607454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036151#comment-13036151 ] Niels Basjes commented on HADOOP-7305: -------------------------------------- Regarding the " -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. " To test this: Do what I described in the issue and the mentioned error should not occur. > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15128-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 13:32:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745B74E61 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95425 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95391 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95383 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 13:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9CBD12B9 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <366104012.26546.1305811907638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1419221698.23009.1305741287424.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7300) Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036179#comment-13036179 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7300: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #693 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/693/]) HADOOP-7300. Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124368 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfiguration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/StringUtils.java > Configuration methods that return collections are inconsistent about mutability > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7300 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7300 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7300.txt > > > In particular, getTrimmedStringCollection seems to return an immutable collection, whereas getStringCollection returns a mutable one. > IMO we should always return mutable collections since these methods by definition are doing copies. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15129-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 13:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AA934E95 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95679 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95650 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95642 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89461D12B7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <826611719.26544.1305811907559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <600939426.23052.1305741648704.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7301) FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036178#comment-13036178 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7301: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #693 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/693/]) HADOOP-7301. FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method. Contributed by Jonathan Hsieh eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124406 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSDataInputStream.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FSMainOperationsBaseTest.java > FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7301 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7301 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Jonathan Hsieh > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7301.2.patch, hadoop-7301.patch > > > Ideally FSDataInputStream should expose a getWrappedStream method similarly to how FSDataOutputStream exposes a getWrappedStream method. Exposing this is useful for verifying correctness in tests cases. This FSDataInputStream type is the class that the o.a.h.fs.FileSystem.open call returns. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15130-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 13:32:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA8744EB0 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95935 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95884 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95876 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 13:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF30D12BB for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2080523371.26548.1305811907696.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <957076305.12265.1297477317500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7137) Remove hod contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036180#comment-13036180 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7137: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #693 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/693/]) HADOOP-7137. Remove hod contrib docs. Contributed by Nigel Daley eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1124456 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hod_scheduler.xml > Remove hod contrib > ------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7137 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7137-additional.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch, HADOOP-7137.patch > > > As per vote on general@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201102.mbox/%3CAC35A7EF-1D68-4055-8D47-EDA2FCF8C2F6@mac.com%3E) I will > svn remove common/trunk/src/contrib/hod > using this Jira. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15131-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 14:16:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 885604DAF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29044 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 14:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28998 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 14:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28951 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 14:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F9D15DA for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <25051130.26686.1305814547777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036202#comment-13036202 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Love it. Comments: SunOS - why not jdk1.6.* to get latest patch version, or jdk*.*? Using the last item in the glob expansion or search in reverse order should generally get the latest version. Linux - Same as SunOS. Also, why aren't /usr/java/default and /usr/lib/jvm/default-java checked first? Overall, maybe globs aren't a great idea since it may lead to a lot more paths being added which I think is Eli's concern. Would it make more sense to only support using the "standard" mechanisms of an OS if that OS provides one? In which case the functionality is to make hadoop a good citizen of that OS, and not to make pseudo-intelligent guesses? > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15132-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 14:18:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5BBA477D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33765 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 14:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33710 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 14:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33652 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 14:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A6ED173B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <986514989.26699.1305814667732.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036205#comment-13036205 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Correction: Eli's concern = Allen's concern. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15133-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 15:31:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ECFB482C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70679 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 15:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70648 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 15:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70639 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 15:31:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654E5D171F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <447201594.26940.1305819047411.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6962) FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036252#comment-13036252 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6962: ------------------------------------- Apologies, my comments were more about the patch on the linked HDFS-1869. The FileSystem api for creating directories is somewhat confusing. Here's my reading of the code: For localfs: 1. *public boolean mkdirs(Path f)* uses the umask for dirs0..N. 2. *public boolean mkdirs(Path f, FsPermission permission)* uses umask for dir0..N-1, given perms for dirN. For hdfs: 1. *public boolean mkdirs(Path f)* uses the parent dir's permission for dir0..N-1, 0777 for dirN. 2. *public boolean mkdirs(Path f, FsPermission permission)* uses the parent dir's permission for dir0..N-1, given permission for dirN In both cases, *public +static+ boolean mkdirs(FileSystem fs, Path dir, FsPermission permission)* calls #1 + setPermission which has the same effect as #2, hence this change. The linked HDFS bug creates dir0..N with the given permissions which restores how it used to work, and restores posix compliance. However, it now differs from localfs, but localfs is in contradiction to FileSystem: {code} /** * Make the given file and all non-existent parents into * directories. Has the semantics of Unix 'mkdir -p'. * Existence of the directory hierarchy is not an error. */ public abstract boolean mkdirs(Path f, FsPermission permission ) throws IOException; {code} > FileSystem.mkdirs(Path, FSPermission) should use the permission for all of the created directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6962 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6962 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-6962.patch > > > Currently, FileSystem.mkdirs only applies the permissions to the last level if it was created. It should be applied to *all* levels that are created. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15134-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 16:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A88034B6C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46167 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46139 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46122 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 16:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A90D1367 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <136728320.27026.1305821087613.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria reopened HADOOP-7297: --------------------------------------- Reopening since the issue of docs is valid. There are CN and BN node docs on the tagged svn rev: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.20.203.0/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hdfs_user_guide.xml > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15135-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 16:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B09404BA1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48007 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47978 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47970 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 16:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FBAD136B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1695075500.27028.1305821087668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036268#comment-13036268 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ FYI: I'm not removing my -1 as long as this remains in the main hadoop bin code path. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15136-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 16:27:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC15145D2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87340 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87296 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 16:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87288 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 16:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA46D1B13 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1182406264.27131.1305822407384.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1250812071.19292.1305645587504.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7297) Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036280#comment-13036280 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7297: ------------------------------------------- (What I mean is the bad docs ought to be removed, not the inclusion of CN/BN). > Error in the documentation regarding Checkpoint/Backup Node > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7297 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7297 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: arnaud p > Priority: Trivial > > On http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.203.0/hdfs_user_guide.html#Checkpoint+Node: the command bin/hdfs namenode -checkpoint required to launch the backup/checkpoint node does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15137-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 17:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC5B347F7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7337 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 17:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7276 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 17:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7232 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 17:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEDAD1B0C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 17:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Start metrics system even if config files are missing ----------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7306 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: metrics Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.23.0 Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15138-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:01:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FE8F4183 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21137 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21105 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21097 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:01:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:01:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B12DD1E3D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <64213023.27398.1305828048299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7306: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15139-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:03:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D4664BE7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25732 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:03:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25635 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25581 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:03:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:03:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B595ED1FA5 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:02:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2113839943.27420.1305828168740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7306: ---------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) patch v1 also fix a minor bug for metrics system shutdown in mini-cluster mode. > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15140-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96A84139 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69395 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69363 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69354 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:33:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:33:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D854BD1DE5 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <87037440.27579.1305829967882.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6832: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1 on the merged {{h-6832.patch}}. I committed this. Thanks Owen and Todd! Using {{default.web.user}} would be more descriptive, but at least searching for "hadoop dr.who" yields relevant, whinging results. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15141-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:37:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 613BF4645 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73971 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73938 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73930 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAD9D1F64 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <273487876.27592.1305830207564.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036356#comment-13036356 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6832: ------------------------------------- I am still strongly against "dr who". I understand it's some kind of tradition to put Dr Who references throughout our code base. Unfortunately the users aren't in on the joke. I will open another JIRA to remove these references. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15142-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:37:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1880B4674 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74809 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74747 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74657 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:37:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:37:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11AFD1F6A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove Dr Who references ------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7307 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15143-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:41:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B2834B00 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87751 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87697 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87680 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DBDD1186 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1633474446.27609.1305830448131.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036358#comment-13036358 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6832: --------------------------------------- *nod* Discussing that in a separate thread makes sense. > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15144-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448504EB2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92590 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92559 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92551 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCBAD132A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <202727988.27625.1305830687454.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036361#comment-13036361 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7305: ------------------------------------- +1 > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15145-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:49:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFFBB42B9 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7953 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:49:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7924 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:49:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7916 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:49:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:49:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:49:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE903D14E6 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:48:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1813524902.27636.1305830930842.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7305: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Verified that "ant eclipse" generated a .classpath file with the correct tools.jar. Committed to 0.22 and trunk. Thanks, Niels! > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15146-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:51:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9F7D4332 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10538 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10509 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10501 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:51:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090CD15E9 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:50:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <420986534.27640.1305831048064.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036365#comment-13036365 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7306: ------------------------------------- +1 pending Hudson results. Thanks, Luke > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15147-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 18:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3182A43E7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15877 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15839 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 18:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15831 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 18:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E6D1850 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 18:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <318493213.27658.1305831287527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036368#comment-13036368 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- I don't think it's worth removing them, although correcting them would be a good idea. The Doctor is his name, not his title. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15148-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 19:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC8D54D18 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79416 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:30:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79388 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79380 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 19:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32C8D18AC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1995734346.27798.1305833387927.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036394#comment-13036394 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7305: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #610 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/610/]) HADOOP-7305. Eclipse project classpath should include tools.jar from JDK. Contributed by Niels Basjes. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125051 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15149-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 19:30:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDC6F4D67 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80126 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80094 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80086 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 19:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEBED18A7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1727244861.27794.1305833387709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036393#comment-13036393 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6832: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #610 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/610/]) HADOOP-6832. Add an authentication plugin using a configurable static user for the web UI. Contributed by Owen O'Malley and Todd Lipcon cdouglas : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125043 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/package.html * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/TestStaticUserWebFilter.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/StaticUserWebFilter.java > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15150-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 19:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A56C4389 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88956 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88908 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 19:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88892 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 19:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:40:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668F0D1C69 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1035186083.27823.1305833987416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036401#comment-13036401 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- Hi Sanjay. I think adding a configuration for viewfs for the home directory pattern would be the best route. eg a C-style format string like "/user/%s/" could be used. If you want to commit this as is to fix the bug and do that in a separate JIRA, that's fine. +1 or happy to re-review if you want to do the config option in this one. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15151-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 472074929 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28746 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28716 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28704 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:05:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611D2D1728 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2007932227.27902.1305835487394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036412#comment-13036412 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- hmm, Suresh, are you looking at HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff? I don't see changes to FileSystem.java > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15152-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 099C14756 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57882 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57858 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57850 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:23:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5DD1005 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <665646418.27971.1305836567397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7308) Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7308 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7308.txt MAPREDUCE-2372 improved TaskLogAppender to no longer need as much "wiring" in log4j.properties. There are also some old properties in there that are no longer used (eg logsRetainHours and noKeepSplits). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15153-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66563476C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58137 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58107 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58099 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840D1D1008 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1138455782.27974.1305836567537.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <665646418.27971.1305836567397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7308) Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7308: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7308.txt > Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7308 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7308.txt > > > MAPREDUCE-2372 improved TaskLogAppender to no longer need as much "wiring" in log4j.properties. There are also some old properties in there that are no longer used (eg logsRetainHours and noKeepSplits). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15154-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:23:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 224774796 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58544 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58482 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58336 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A108D100A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1097799572.27976.1305836567627.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <665646418.27971.1305836567397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7308) Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7308: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7308 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7308.txt > > > MAPREDUCE-2372 improved TaskLogAppender to no longer need as much "wiring" in log4j.properties. There are also some old properties in there that are no longer used (eg logsRetainHours and noKeepSplits). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15155-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 309B44AB5 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67904 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67871 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67863 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EBED12F7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1418067763.28013.1305836808270.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036432#comment-13036432 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Thanks. I will file a separate jira because it is not clear to me if the config should be for only viewfs or a more general config variable that applies to all file systems. Further, Doug and I debated this on HDFS-593; so i misspoke that we had added SS config - the patch did not go through since Doug didn't think it was important enough, although he agreed that it wasn't a client side property. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15156-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:27:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEA654B05 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68678 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68624 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68507 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FBFD12FC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7309 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Owen O'Malley We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15157-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:27:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 213684B16 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68803 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68745 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68595 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:27:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D12AD12FF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1371522151.28018.1305836808443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley reassigned HADOOP-7309: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Owen O'Malley > improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > > We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15158-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3DC4C45 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71538 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71506 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71492 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:29:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE9ED1409 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <832964438.28020.1305836927377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7309: ---------------------------------- Attachment: site.patch > improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: site.patch > > > We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15159-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E72134FAD for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83534 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83471 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83450 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9E1D1637 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1566570321.28035.1305837167581.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036435#comment-13036435 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7287: ---------------------------------------- Just finished running the full test suite. All of the M/R tests passed. The following HDFS tests failed, all of which are known to be failing or flaky. org.apache.hadoop.tools.TestJMXGet org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestFileConcurrentReader org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSStorageStateRecovery > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15160-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 20:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8172447A2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99597 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99569 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 20:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99560 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 20:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A94ED18EF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2103866252.28052.1305837647629.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036440#comment-13036440 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7309: --------------------------------------- +1 Built on my box, verified footer generated in both html and pdf docs. > improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: site.patch > > > We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15161-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6360940D2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33255 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33176 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33038 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C685FD1333 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <22523821.28152.1305838907809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch Patch for 0.20.security branch - to become part of 0.20.205 release. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15162-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:02:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A132C411A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33676 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33315 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33134 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC696D1352 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Trash location needs to be revisited ------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7310 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sanjay Radia Assignee: Sanjay Radia Fix For: 0.23.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15163-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:04:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8948C4AD6 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38303 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:04:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38272 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:04:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38264 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:04:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:04:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53B6D14B3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1061413532.28162.1305839027673.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036458#comment-13036458 ] Nicholas Telford commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------------ I double checked the patch - there aren't any changes to FileSystem.java > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15164-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF6F64512 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59993 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59958 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59950 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:15:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF59D1B04 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <387003054.28213.1305839688324.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7309. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed committed. > improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: site.patch > > > We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15165-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:15:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B8F4578 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60543 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:15:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60487 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:15:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60433 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:15:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84840D1B0E for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:14:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1352898241.28220.1305839688539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1169466475.28015.1305836808361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Closed] (HADOOP-7309) improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley closed HADOOP-7309. --------------------------------- > improve trademark symbol usage and add trademark footer > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7309 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: site.patch > > > We only need to mention trademarks on the first usage, add a footer specifying the trademarks, and update the pdf files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15166-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:19:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FB68478D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74571 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74536 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74528 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C47D1DDD for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1321633523.28241.1305839927560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036475#comment-13036475 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7310: -------------------------------------- Trash is located at /user//.Trash Its location needs to be revisted: # Does not work well with Quotas. For example, /user/joe and /project/xx may have quotas. When files are deleted from /project/xx they move to /user/joe/.Trash which causes problems since the user quota is usually much less than that of project-xx. # If customer has a special data hdfs cluster where there are no home directories, then one is forced to have home directories on this data cluster just to accommodate Trash; this can be confusing or may be used as a way get around quotas. # With federation, one is likely to have a NN for user accounts and other NNs for /projects, /data etc. The issues listed for point 2 apply here. I propose two solutions: * A. Put trash in /Trash/; generally no quotas will be configured for /Trash since it is cleaned up periodically. This addresses all the three issues raised above. This solution however breaks compatibility. Note Trash applies ONLY to rm's performed via the shell's -rm command. * B. The trash location is configured as SS configuration variable. I prefer solution A, since it is one less configuration variable. Do folks see *real* compatibility problem here? > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15167-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:25:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1F7F4D4D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85927 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85894 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85881 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:25:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6DBD11D0 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2130487242.28272.1305840288502.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036480#comment-13036480 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- bq. FYI: I'm not removing my -1 as long as this remains in the main hadoop bin code path. Allen - what is your technical objection? There is not a performance impact to hadoop-config.sh, and even if there were, hadoop-config.sh is not a measurable part of hadoop command execution. {noformat} common1 (trunk)$ export JAVA_HOME=/home/eli/toolchain/jdk1.6.0_24-x64 common1 (trunk)$ time for i in {1..10}; do . bin/hadoop-config.sh ; done real 0m0.817s user 0m0.500s sys 0m0.120s common1 (trunk)$ unset JAVA_HOME common1 (trunk)$ time for i in {1..10}; do . bin/hadoop-config.sh ; done real 0m0.806s user 0m0.550s sys 0m0.060s {noformat} > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15168-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:25:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D296F4DD5 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88350 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88314 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:25:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88279 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:25:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:25:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEABAD11DA for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <367985444.28281.1305840288777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036483#comment-13036483 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------------------ LOG.info should be LOG.debug in the 205 patch. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15169-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EA734E9C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94258 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94198 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94101 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC507D1356 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <349233579.28291.1305840407899.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch New patch addresses the comment. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15170-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:27:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3982B4EC2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94963 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:27:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94918 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94910 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A4D1361 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <955503386.28301.1305840408231.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036487#comment-13036487 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7307: --------------------------------------- I don't like this proposed change either. The result is easy to google (see http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hadoop+drwho ) and is more interesting that a utilitarian "default.web.user" or some such. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15171-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F24AB4C21 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99686 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99656 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99584 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CD1D160F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <650203133.28347.1305840708028.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1105491925.1375.1305065387432.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7272) Remove unnecessary security related info logs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036494#comment-13036494 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7272: ------------------------------------------------ +1 the new 205 patch looks good. > Remove unnecessary security related info logs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7272 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7272.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch, HADOOP-7272.rel205.patch > > > Two info logs are printed when connection to RPC server is established, is not necessary. On a production cluster, these log lines made up of close to 50% of lines in the namenode log. I propose changing them into debug logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15172-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECC36468F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4469 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4421 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4401 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9D5D175E for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1474873918.28357.1305840827712.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036495#comment-13036495 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- Some of our poor users don't have internet access in the buildings/datacenters where their clusters reside. (I don't know how they keep busy while waiting on their MR jobs without twitter... but somehow they manage). So, a self-documenting "utilitarian" solution is preferable to an "interesting" one that has to be googled. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15173-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B707E49EB for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24065 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23975 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23967 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF7D1CE8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1193575182.28438.1305841427683.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036509#comment-13036509 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7305: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #53 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/53/]) HADOOP-7305. Eclipse project classpath should include tools.jar from JDK. Contributed by Niels Basjes. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125050 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/build.xml > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15174-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 21:46:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81FF44526 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25388 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25343 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 21:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25335 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 21:46:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:46:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BF2D1E12 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1132150553.28453.1305841547655.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036511#comment-13036511 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- In the above the ". bin/hadoop-config.sh" should use "bash" so it tries to re-detect JAVA_HOME w/ each invocation, however the difference in run time is still tiny. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15175-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:02:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E28C4F25 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41729 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41705 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41696 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B724ED14F3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1312733255.28522.1305842508746.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch Store config templates in $PREFIX/share/hadoop/templates, and change related script to use the new location. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15176-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:11:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0BB14A3F for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51577 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:11:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51504 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:11:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51473 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:11:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:11:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2601D1627 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eugene Koontz (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <852549278.28545.1305842627661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036523#comment-13036523 ] Eugene Koontz commented on HADOOP-7307: --------------------------------------- A bit ironically, the first link that google returns has the following: "Not the most helpful username to pick for that scenario, to say the least." > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15177-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8863A415D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59814 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59786 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59778 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76721D1E93 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1854804070.28608.1305843707481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036532#comment-13036532 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6255: --------------------------------------- For trunk, the default should be $PREFIX/var/log and $PREFIX/var/run. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15178-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63257419A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61191 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61164 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61156 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793A7D1F80 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1634949548.28642.1305843827493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036533#comment-13036533 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6255: --------------------------------------- It also looks like you picked up a generated file (configure). > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15179-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:40:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BA7B4AD8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85352 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85310 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85301 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:40:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:40:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4839D2507 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <454487436.28749.1305844787735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch Set default log and pid directory to $PREFIX/var/log and $PREFIX/var/run respectively for hadoop-env.sh Removed incorrect change to src/test/c++/runAs/configure. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15180-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:50:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54262434D for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98321 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98271 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98263 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:50:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705ADD2918 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7311 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: metrics Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko Fix For: 0.20.204.0 HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15181-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 22:56:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80CEE4515 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3732 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3570 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 22:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3562 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 22:56:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:56:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB23DD2A8B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Cesar Delgado (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1772838797.28835.1305845747698.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036553#comment-13036553 ] Cesar Delgado commented on HADOOP-7307: --------------------------------------- As an operations person this was horrible the first time it came up. Seeing a user that is not supposed to be in your system and was not created by anyone can cause a huge panic and waste a lot of time. The error should be thrown with the correct user and group (not Tardis) for the process on the system (ie. *NIX user and group) Errors should be clear and concise. I'm ok with looking at manuals for extra information but, like Todd said, "just google it" is not an option in most data-centers. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15182-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 23:04:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CF1B4B7B for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9720 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:04:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9691 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9678 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 23:04:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659A0D2C81 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <367540856.28871.1305846227412.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036559#comment-13036559 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- Thanks for reviewing Daryn! bq. SunOS - why not jdk1.6.* to get latest patch version, or jdk*.*? Using the last item in the glob expansion or search in reverse order should generally get the latest version. >From googling it looked like "jdk1.6.0" was a stable path on Solaris, ie no glob necessary. Maybe someone who uses Solaris can verify, I'm fine punting Solaris to a future change as well. bq. Linux - Same as SunOS. Also, why aren't /usr/java/default and /usr/lib/jvm/default-java checked first? The code looks for Sun Java 6 first because Hadoop depends on Sun Java 6, ie we don't necessarily want the system default Java. bq. Overall, maybe globs aren't a great idea since it may lead to a lot more paths being added which I think is Allen's concern. These globs should not result in a lot more paths being added. Eg how many paths would you expect "/usr/java/jdk1.6*" to match on most systems? Probably none, a couple would be a lot right? Even if these globs matched 20 paths per above it shouldn't impact performance. bq. Would it make more sense to only support using the "standard" mechanisms of an OS if that OS provides one? In which case the functionality is to make hadoop a good citizen of that OS, and not to make pseudo-intelligent guesses? There is no standard path across Linux distributions for Sun Java 6, these globs match Sun Java 6 on popular Linux distributions, that's how the list was generated. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15183-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 23:06:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA6F54C81 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10975 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10943 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10935 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 23:06:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513CCD2CFC for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2059142414.28880.1305846347329.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Shvachko updated HADOOP-7311: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: metrics-0.20-security.patch Could somebody please review this. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15184-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 23:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F16A4DFF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20169 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20136 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20128 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D63D2EF1 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1653939372.28898.1305846827721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036563#comment-13036563 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7307: --------------------------------------- Cesar, this isn't about changing an error message. Todd is suggesting changing the default name. You would have had *exactly* the same problem with "webuser" except it would be far worse panic. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15185-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 23:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8027B463E for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27874 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27849 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27841 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 23:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13ADD11A8 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2145166079.28929.1305847187853.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036570#comment-13036570 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- I think if I saw messages in my audit log that "webuser" or "hdfswebui" was accessing files, I'd pretty quickly figure out where they were coming from. Seeing messages from "dr.who" in the audit log would scare me. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15186-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 19 23:51:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F0194890 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63384 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:51:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63353 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 23:51:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63345 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 23:51:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:51:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:51:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CF5D1B92 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <281161099.28997.1305849048749.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036581#comment-13036581 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- Trunk is already on metrics 2. HADOOP-7190 added back the old package to make it compatible with legacy tools. 0.20-2xx release is on metrics 2 since the beginning and is in production for many months. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15187-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:03:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 554354328 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83008 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82957 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82835 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:03:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:03:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:03:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BF8D2090 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:02:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <677175669.29028.1305849769294.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036587#comment-13036587 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479736/hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch against trunk revision 1125051. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/484//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/484//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/484//console This message is automatically generated. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15188-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2478C4776 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83845 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83716 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83529 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:05:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0D1D20F6 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7312 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.22.0 This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15189-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:09:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B28E548DF for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89701 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:09:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89661 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:09:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89640 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6CD2248 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1624586812.29037.1305850127652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036589#comment-13036589 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- I wonder what you're trying to achieve. The patch completely breaks metrics2 instrumentation (i.e. people already on metrics2 will not see the metrics, especially JMX metrics support in JT and TT). If you just want to make Ganglia work, porting Ganglia plugin to metrics2 is a much smaller patch. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15190-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 377784B84 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92771 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92738 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92730 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:15:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:15:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5BED243D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:14:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1154349099.29094.1305850490239.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036594#comment-13036594 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479854/HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch against trunk revision 1125051. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 27 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 3 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/485//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/485//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/485//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/485//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15191-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:27:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A2994428 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15353 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15322 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15313 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1F2D2796 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2101164540.29120.1305851207509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <665646418.27971.1305836567397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7308) Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036598#comment-13036598 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7308: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479825/hadoop-7308.txt against trunk revision 1125051. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/486//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/486//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/486//console This message is automatically generated. > Remove unused TaskLogAppender configurations from log4j.properties > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7308 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7308 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7308.txt > > > MAPREDUCE-2372 improved TaskLogAppender to no longer need as much "wiring" in log4j.properties. There are also some old properties in there that are no longer used (eg logsRetainHours and noKeepSplits). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15192-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00A204446 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15659 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15582 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15548 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DBED279C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <42598014.29126.1305851207721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036600#comment-13036600 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7306: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479806/hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch against trunk revision 1125051. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/487//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/487//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/487//console This message is automatically generated. > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15193-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C41B4496 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16694 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16664 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16656 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15A0D283C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1173108669.29149.1305851327657.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036602#comment-13036602 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------------------ > ... The result is easy to google (see http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hadoop+drwho ) ... I had removed "Dr Who" once in HADOOP-2833, which is the second search result. However, it managed to come back. Now, people are scared -- it becomes the phantom of the cluster. Just kidding. :) > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15194-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 00:35:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6493E4B36 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24942 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24917 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 00:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24908 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 00:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B143D298B for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1863194420.29179.1305851687630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036606#comment-13036606 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- bq. However, it managed to come back. The Doctor can regenerate 13 times (http://bit.ly/kh3sDj). As such, it'll take 11 more jiras before this effort succeeds. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15195-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 01:10:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC7E4DF8 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53651 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53618 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53608 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 01:10:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE0D2008 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942245897.29267.1305853788447.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671.patch mvn-layout.sh How to apply the patch (I'm using GIT): * Checkout hadoop-common trunk * run the mvn-layout.sh script * git 'add -u' and 'git add' all new files dirs (git will recognize all the moving of files are renames) * commit all changes as first commit (a separate JIRA could be created for this if you find it necessary) * apply the HADOOP-6671.patch * test all works as indicated below * commit It requires Maven 3 Typical Maven goals: * mvn clean * mvn compile * mvn test * mvn package The last one generates the TARBALL. As with the Ant build, FORREST_HOME must be defined. Options: * -Dtest= to run a single test * -DskipTests to skip running the tests (package by default runs tests) * -Dcompile.native to compile the native code This patch does the minimal code changes (one line in a test class where 'build/' was hardcoded) and the fixFont script for chinese documentation. There are some testcases that are writing files in the current directory instead under the build directory. Those should be fixed as part of a follow up issue (thus concentrating this one in just the mavenization). Native code compilation and Documentation generation are done using 2 auxiliary ant scripts invoked from Maven POM. As a follow up, when Mavenizing HDFS and MAPREDUCE we can introduce a parent POM file where all dependencies versions are commonly defined (same version for all). A couple of JAR files are missing from the final TARBALL, I assume they were included in the Ant build due to a ivy scope mistake (jdiff, aspectj-tools) JDIFF/Clover/FindBugs/Cobertura/etc/etc can be easily integrated in the Maven POM. But again, I think this should be done incrementally on top of this. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15196-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 01:10:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A9134E07 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53893 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:10:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53856 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53847 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 01:10:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:10:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563ABD203B for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:09:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2053156835.29290.1305853789350.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15197-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 01:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81470405D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58884 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58859 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 01:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58851 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 01:14:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A40AD214A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:13:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <762590996.29312.1305854029038.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036616#comment-13036616 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479868/HADOOP-6671.patch against trunk revision 1125051. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 18 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/488//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15198-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 02:00:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A71C54237 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86169 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86137 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86129 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 02:00:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:00:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:00:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3045D2ACE for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 01:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 01:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <868302516.29389.1305856788795.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch * Bugfix for debian package name * Use absolute path for setup scripts in case $HADOOP_PREFIX/bin/hadoop is not in user PATH. * Fix typo in patch 5. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15199-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 02:30:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F92262B9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1185 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:30:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1160 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1152 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 02:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:26 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBFCD2138 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "E. Sammer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1810461116.29429.1305858587376.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7313) Remove all framework use of Configuration default args MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Remove all framework use of Configuration default args ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7313 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7313 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: E. Sammer The Hadoop code base should not use the form of Configuration#get*() that accepts a default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15200-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 02:30:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E46B86328 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1950 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1914 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1865 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 02:30:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1966D213C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "E. Sammer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1541567534.29431.1305858587789.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1810461116.29429.1305858587376.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7313) Remove all framework use of Configuration default args MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036632#comment-13036632 ] E. Sammer commented on HADOOP-7313: ----------------------------------- Many places in the code base use the form of Configuration#get*() that accepts defaults. This makes life much easier for developers in that we can be sure we don't get a NullPointerException on return, but it creates a situation where *-default.xml does not match the defaults supplied in code. This presents potentially odd behavior. Ideally, an option missing from the proper *-default.xml file is a build / release error rather than something that silently results in an undocumented value. Ari Rabkin did some research into this[1] and identified some of these inconsistencies. [1] http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~asrabkin/hadoop_opts/cdh3u0-options.html (While this says cdh3u0, I believe it still applies to Apache Hadoop trunk). > Remove all framework use of Configuration default args > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7313 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7313 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: E. Sammer > > The Hadoop code base should not use the form of Configuration#get*() that accepts a default. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15201-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:05:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1EA761DD for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27110 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:05:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27082 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27070 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:05:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:05:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:05:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B84AD2875 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:04:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <641650530.29489.1305860689240.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036640#comment-13036640 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------- Cool stuff, Alejandro! A few things I noticed while trying this out locally: - nit: The project name is "Hadoop Common" rather than "Hadoop Commons" - I'm getting errors for our usage of the com.sun.javadoc stuff - eg: {code} /home/todd/git/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools/ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java:[42,16] cannot access com.sun.javadoc.Doclet class file for com.sun.javadoc.Doclet not found return JDiff.start(RootDocProcessor.process(root)); /home/todd/git/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools/RootDocProcessor.java:[55,12] cannot find symbol {code} Is this the bit where I need to add a softlink? Any workaround for this we can do local to the project? - "mvn test" seems to be dumping all the log to stdout. Is there a way to get it to log just to the files like ant used to? - is there an equivalent of our "bin-package" target which makes a tarball but doesn't build the forrest docs? - the assembly doesn't seem to build if I choose not to compile native: {code} [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] An Ant BuildException has occured: /home/todd/git/hadoop-common/target/native/lib does not exist. {code} > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15202-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:24:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EACAC6929 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37059 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36847 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36839 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DA9D2C5C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1293410178.29518.1305861827356.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7306: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk, thanks Luke! > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15203-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 580796E9D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44664 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:38:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44524 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44511 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F215D2F9E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <809017996.29546.1305862667583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7302: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.23.0) 0.22.0 Release Note: Option webinterface.private.actions has been renamed to mapreduce.jobtracker.webinterface.trusted and should be specified in mapred-site.xml instead of core-site.xml (was: option webinterface.private.actions has been renamed to mapreduce.jobtracker.webinterface.trusted) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 22 and trunk (I elected to commit to 22 since it is low risk cleanup) > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15204-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:45:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 737A162BD for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47879 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:45:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47716 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47705 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8B6D212E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1040833875.29556.1305863087548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036653#comment-13036653 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7306: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #612 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/612/]) HADOOP-7306. Start metrics system even if config files are missing. Contributed by Luke Lu. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125216 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/TestMetricsConfig.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/MetricsConfig.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/MetricsSystemImpl.java > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15205-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:59:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79EEA6429 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52648 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52615 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52589 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:59:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F662D24E8 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1972722743.29575.1305863927453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036657#comment-13036657 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7302: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #613 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/613/]) HADOOP-7302. webinterface.private.actions should be renamed and moved to the MapReduce project. Contributed by Ari Rabkin. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125221 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15206-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 03:59:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C9EA642B for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52851 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:59:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52620 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 03:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52602 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 03:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4B6D24EC for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 03:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <698659632.29579.1305863927571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <456709527.7650.1305225707408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7283) Include 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries in Jenkins tarball builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White resolved HADOOP-7283. ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Tom White The build at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-Build/ is now producing tarballs with the correct native libraries. > Include 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries in Jenkins tarball builds > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7283 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7283 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > The job at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/G-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-22-Build/ is building tarballs, but they do not currently include both 32-bit and 64-bit native libraries. We should update/duplicate hadoop-nighly/hudsonBuildHadoopRelease.sh to support post-split builds. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15207-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 04:43:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 186EA664E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 04:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75912 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 04:43:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75336 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 04:43:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75300 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 04:43:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 04:43:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 04:43:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE576D2FE6 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 04:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 04:42:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <196830359.29647.1305866571841.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036667#comment-13036667 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------------------- I am not doing anything with metrix2 except trying not to break it. My motivation is to make the original metrics work, which doesn't for me in 0.20-security branch. > The patch completely breaks metrics2 instrumentation Are you saying metrics2 are broken in 0.22? > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15208-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 06:29:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAE676323 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42472 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 06:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42439 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 06:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42430 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 06:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D54D2C28 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1151338537.29793.1305872927413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria reassigned HADOOP-7312: ----------------------------------------- Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15209-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 06:43:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C909694E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50814 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 06:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50786 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 06:43:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50760 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 06:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630CDD215D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1667705469.29807.1305873767402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff The version string also carries the complete version number (0.21.0, for instance) instead of just the major.minor -- perhaps its a good idea to switch to just two ones for avoiding maintaining over time? > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15210-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 12:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FBCE6FDD for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44104 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 12:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44080 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 12:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44070 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 12:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C878DD3466 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Smith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <813413793.30334.1305896087817.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036802#comment-13036802 ] Matt Smith commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------ You gave me hope and then took it away. Basically, Todd... Run. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15211-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 13:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C4DB67A4 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8609 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8569 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8557 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 13:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B927ED31BE for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1710210271.30396.1305898367755.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036820#comment-13036820 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7302: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #694 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/694/]) HADOOP-7302. webinterface.private.actions should be renamed and moved to the MapReduce project. Contributed by Ari Rabkin. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125221 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15212-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 13:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BC5467BB for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8844 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8811 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8803 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23373D31C6 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <875542021.30403.1305898368141.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6832) Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036821#comment-13036821 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6832: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #694 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/694/]) HADOOP-6832. Add an authentication plugin using a configurable static user for the web UI. Contributed by Owen O'Malley and Todd Lipcon cdouglas : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125043 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/package.html * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/TestStaticUserWebFilter.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/http/lib/StaticUserWebFilter.java > Provide a web server plugin that uses a static user for the web UI > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6832 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6832 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: h-6382.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, h-6832.patch, hadoop-6832.txt, static-web-user.patch > > > We need a simple plugin that uses a static user for clusters with security that don't want to authenticate users on the web UI. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15213-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 13:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9901867CA for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9077 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8994 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8916 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 13:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE81D31CA for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1874743663.30406.1305898368250.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <580585038.27366.1305827567709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7306) Start metrics system even if config files are missing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036822#comment-13036822 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7306: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #694 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/694/]) HADOOP-7306. Start metrics system even if config files are missing. Contributed by Luke Lu. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125216 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/TestMetricsConfig.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/MetricsConfig.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/impl/MetricsSystemImpl.java > Start metrics system even if config files are missing > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7306 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7306-missing-conf-v1.patch > > > Per experience and discussion with HDFS-1922, it seems preferable to treat missing metrics config file as empty/default config, which is more compatible with metrics v1 behavior (the MBeans are always registered.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15214-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 13:33:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3E3867EB for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9359 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9317 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 13:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9309 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 13:33:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51015D31CE for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1645911889.30408.1305898368328.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036823#comment-13036823 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7305: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #694 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/694/]) HADOOP-7305. Eclipse project classpath should include tools.jar from JDK. Contributed by Niels Basjes. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1125051 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15215-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C13766B9D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77323 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77280 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77272 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF11DD349E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7314 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15216-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:25:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4908E6C39 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78928 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78886 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78876 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B6AD35C2 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <506083476.30519.1305901487392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7314.patch > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15217-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:27:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A23456CD5 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81108 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:27:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81061 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81049 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:27:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:27:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B43D36FC for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeffrey Naisbitt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <516823503.30521.1305901607490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Naisbitt updated HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15218-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:29:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63E726D6A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86693 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86663 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86653 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D72AD379C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <891600564.30544.1305901727379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch I have attached an initial patch pulling in JMXProxyServlet.java from Tomcat 7.0.14. I pulled over two classes and part of a third. org.apache.tomcat.util.ExceptionUtils - only the package name changed. org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.Registry - two methods from this class were moved into JMXProxyServlet getType and convertValue and modified to use mBeanServer from JMXProxyServlet instead of the MBeanServer from Registry org.apache.catalina.manager.JMXProxyServlet - pacakge name changed. Registry was removed and replaced with a direct call to get MBeanServer, and two private methods. There are no tests and no documentation changes right now (Which is why I marked it alpha). I wanted feedback on it first. 1) is the package OK org.apache.hadoop.jmx? 2) is the URL OK /jmx? 3) where would be an appropriate place to document this? 4) is this even the right thing to do? I am not sure how standard the format is. I need to dig into it a bit more to really understand it, because all I have done is a simple port. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15219-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 649C26E07 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94365 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94327 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94314 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E1D390A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1422465933.30552.1305901967570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036849#comment-13036849 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------- (btw, I previously attempted to imply my neg was withdrawn, but I just want to make it unambiguously clear. I really like the idea as evidenced by my jira dupped to this one) bq. From googling it looked like "jdk1.6.0" was a stable path on Solaris, ie no glob necessary. Maybe someone who uses Solaris can verify, I'm fine punting Solaris to a future change as well. My only point/concern is that if a jdk1.6.1. or jdk1.6.2 is installed that this implementation would still default to 1.6.0. What if a 1.6.1, but not 1.6.0, is installed? Or if only jdk1.7.* is installed and perhaps hadoop works fine with either java 6 or 7? The detection is of little use to the user, however I don't know the Solaris conventions. Maybe they have a way to set a "default" java? Perhaps a symlink somewhere? I have no strong feelings, and punting would be fine, or maybe a Solaris user could chime in. bq. These globs should not result in a lot more paths being added. Eg how many paths would you expect "/usr/java/jdk1.6*" to match on most systems? Probably none, a couple would be a lot right? Even if these globs matched 20 paths per above it shouldn't impact performance. Don't worry, I have no performance concerns. I fully agree a few stat calls is minuscule in the overall execution. My mild concern is the maintainability introduced by having to update paths for newer versions of java. However, being a stickler for consistency, I have a little more concern about how updating the paths introduces inconsistent behavior in how the jdk is selected. Then again, perhaps Linux folks are accustomed to inconsistency? :) bq. bq. Linux - Same as SunOS. Also, why aren't /usr/java/default and /usr/lib/jvm/default-java checked first? bq. The code looks for Sun Java 6 first because Hadoop depends on Sun Java 6, ie we don't necessarily want the system default Java. Only for the sake of discussion: If the goal is be a "good citizen" of the host os, then picking the system default is sufficient. This approach should eliminate the need to periodically update the script to pick the newer "preferred" java versions, and remove the inconsistency in how the java version is selected between hadoop releases. It would parallel the Mac/Darwin detection, ie. use the system's default method (if there is one), and if the user wants a different version then they must either change the system default or explicitly set JAVA_HOME. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15220-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 14:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EBC16F35 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32278 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32235 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 14:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32227 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 14:59:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:59:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:59:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15612D32EA for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 14:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <790465403.30607.1305903528084.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036861#comment-13036861 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- Just a quick note, I read through the code for the JMXProxy and it is a plain text format, not JSON or XML. It only supports GET but that can be be modified with a ?set&attr=&val= to set an attribute; ?get&attr= to get a specific attribute; or ?qry= to output all attributes who's names match the query using the mBeanServer.queryNames method. the default is ?qry=*:* if nothing else if given. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15221-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 15:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B7D16C99 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85304 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 15:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85195 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 15:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85187 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 15:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D661D3094 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <909186496.30746.1305905447510.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15222-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 15:45:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62D716FCA for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12866 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 15:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12838 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 15:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12830 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 15:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E67D37A9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1688903594.30856.1305906287401.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036899#comment-13036899 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7312: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479881/HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff against trunk revision 1125221. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/491//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/491//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/491//console This message is automatically generated. > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15223-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 17:38:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8291673A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78423 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78358 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78214 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 17:38:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:38:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FDAD3721 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <844152790.31163.1305913067607.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch Fixed 0.20 security branch to use absolute path for setup scripts. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15224-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 17:44:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4574D6B24 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93416 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93383 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93375 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 17:44:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF02D39D8 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1005561839.31231.1305913429172.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036950#comment-13036950 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479934/HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch against trunk revision 1125221. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/492//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15225-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 17:44:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 645916B38 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93694 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93656 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93648 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 17:44:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:44:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4181CD39DB for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <740076828.31234.1305913429265.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036951#comment-13036951 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6605: ------------------------------------------ My technical objection is that there is a high likelihood of getting this wrong. For example, we should have a check to make sure that the java we find is actually 1.6.x. We need a check to make sure that the java we find actually works properly (i.e., I believe it was _18 or so that caused us issues). We have to make the determination if we want to allow heterogenous JREs. What if /usr/java/x isn't a Sun Java? The wildcard generates a whole spate of problems. Do we always pick the oldest version? Do we reverse the regex and grab the newest? No matter what we do there, this is going to cause major problems with those that want to do staged rollouts of new JREs. No, the "but you can always set it" is not an excuse for allowing surprising behavior. ... Again: This is way too much work to shove into the interactive hadoop commands. Until this moves out into a one-time setup, my binding -1 will remain. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15226-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 17:46:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BADC265E1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99769 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99733 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 17:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99723 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 17:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7B8D3B56 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1678631154.31253.1305913547777.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036953#comment-13036953 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- bq. I am not doing anything with metrix2 except trying not to break it. The patch completely removes the instrumentation and tests of metrics v2 in RPC and HDFS. bq. My motivation is to make the original metrics work, which doesn't for me in 0.20-security branch. Can you tell me what's missing for you in metrics v2, except for Gangalia? I can help you porting... bq. Are you saying metrics2 are broken in 0.22? metrics2 is never in 0.22. It's in 0.20.2xx and trunk (targeting 0.23) Last September, after we deployed 0.20.200 internally, I asked the community about the evolution paths of metrics on [the mailing list|http://goo.gl/Rjb1], and the people who care to answer [chose #2|http://goo.gl/NLLs], which was exactly what we did for 0.20.203 and trunk. Your goal now seems to be #3, but your patch doesn't do that. I anticipated possibility of #3 or #3a and put all metrics instrumentation behind interfaces in 0.20.2xx, so it's at least possible without changing the instrumentation code (besides the updater or metrics source implementation). As I pointed out in the original post in the mailing lists, there are down sides for #3, I'd really like to know the reasons for that. I can certainly help you implementing #3, if you can convince the community that it's really needed for 0.20.2xx releases. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15227-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 18:00:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AC026BF9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21478 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21453 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21445 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4FD30D9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <953809656.31308.1305914388396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036963#comment-13036963 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- bq. is the package OK org.apache.hadoop.jmx? is the URL OK /jmx? lgtm. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15228-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 18:00:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E78E96C40 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22361 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 18:00:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22330 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 18:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22322 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 18:00:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 18:00:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5824D30C9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1634978174.31294.1305914387740.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13036962#comment-13036962 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- bq. is the package OK org.apache.hadoop.jmx? is the URL OK /jmx? bq. where would be an appropriate place to document this? package-info.java for javadoc would be a start. bq. Is this even the right thing to do? I am not sure how standard the format is. I need to dig into it a bit more to really understand it, because all I have done is a simple port. We need read-only access and have it return JSON, something like this: {noformat} [ { "bean": "Hadoop:service=...", "attrs": { "attr1": "value1", ... "attrn": "valuen" } }, ... ] {noformat} We also need a way to return a pre-configured set of attributes. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15229-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 19:13:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F19C26A0F for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46129 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:13:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46081 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46063 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 19:13:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:13:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0645DD3E6D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:12:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2126435900.31532.1305918768022.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037010#comment-13037010 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-7269: ----------------------------------------- Sorry, I think I was looking at *001.diff. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15230-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 19:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 327986254 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64475 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64441 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64431 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 19:27:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3928CD33E2 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1393491250.31596.1305919608231.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671b.patch Todd, Thanks for the fast response and detailed review. I've taken care of all your comments except the one regarding the tools.jar (still trying to figure out, the Ant is not finding tools.jar (for some reason JRE is being used, thus my current hack is still needed). The following maven options can be used to alter the build/tests: * -DskipTests * -DskipDocs * -DcompileNative * -Dtest= > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15231-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 19:42:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A5E46AEA for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87522 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87481 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 19:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87446 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 19:42:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:42:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124A6D3A71 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 19:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:41:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <396511573.31658.1305920508071.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7315) Add dynamic config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add dynamic config ------------------ Key: HADOOP-7315 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7315 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: stack I'm sure this issue exists already, at least as part of the discussion around making online schema edits possible, but no hard this having its own issue. Ted started a conversation on this topic up on dev and Todd suggested we lookd at how Hadoop did it over in HADOOP-7001 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15232-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 20:47:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 791E861E3 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13302 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13242 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13234 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9193AD321A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <795544138.31863.1305924407593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7146.txt Couldn't find a way to do the test with MXBeans. This patch just uses /proc to see how many FDs are open, and uses junit's Assume support so it won't run on systems where that's not available. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15233-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 20:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47D1667F0 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14057 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:48:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14027 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:48:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14019 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 20:48:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:48:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:48:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EF4D3337 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:47:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1293400528.31873.1305924468160.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15234-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 20:52:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5483A6A7E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18785 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18751 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18739 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 20:52:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:52:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B49D35B1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 20:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <350711713.31900.1305924707753.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037077#comment-13037077 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- Ok because we are going to go with JSON, and not use JMXProxyServlet more or less unchanged, I think I will take the core of it, but I will probably rename it so there is no confusion with the Tomcat one. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15235-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 21:35:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4212672A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89395 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 21:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89364 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 21:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89356 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 21:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF5D447D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1576731972.32004.1305927287390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037099#comment-13037099 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7146: ---------------------------------------- +1, patch looks great, Todd. I also ran {{TestDFSStorageStateRecovery}} with this patch applied in the course of debugging HDFS-1884, and can confirm that this patch fixes that test as well. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15236-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 22:01:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E29076D4F for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 22:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21804 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 22:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21766 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 22:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21753 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 22:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 22:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 22:01:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9B7D4A8C for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1878512825.32072.1305928848900.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037110#comment-13037110 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6605: --------------------------------------- This struck me as an obvious win, but I'm starting to see Allen's point. Incomplete detection may save some users a couple minutes, but it will cause weird bugs in other systems. The globbing/non-Sun JVM cases are especially salient. The benefit is clear to anyone who's set this variable dozens (if not hundreds) of times, but the potential cost is more subtle. As automatic behavior, this is trying to be too clever for a nominal benefit. That said, the MacOS tool seems designed to accomplish _exactly_ this, and I'd have no problem if it were to show up in the script. If it stops being a reliable way of setting {{JAVA_HOME}}, we'll just fix it. If there are similar tools in Solaris/Linux (doesn't {{/etc/alternatives}} support similar functionality?), we can make use of them. > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15237-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 23:32:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E399633A for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16067 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16006 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15998 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 23:32:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:32:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:32:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8955ED4FF9 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 23:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Hsieh (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7316) Add javadoc comments to FSDataInputStream.getWrappedStream public method. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add javadoc comments to FSDataInputStream.getWrappedStream public method. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7316 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh Fix For: 0.23.0 This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15238-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 23:46:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 773F36F66 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37426 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37402 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37394 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 23:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8858ED433D for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1173363105.32261.1305935147555.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037162#comment-13037162 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7287: ------------------------------------- I tried the manual test case described above in this JIRA -- using {{./bin/hadoop fs -Ddfs.blocksize=4096 -touchz f}} against a local HDFS cluster. The config does not appear to take effect. So, apparently the test cases above are not good enough representations of what really happens for this use case. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15239-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 20 23:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 340536F12 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47090 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47036 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46800 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 23:50:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:50:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:50:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE3FD445B for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 23:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1931082294.32276.1305935387770.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7317) RPC.stopProxy doesn't actually close proxy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 RPC.stopProxy doesn't actually close proxy ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7317 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7317 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Discovered while investigating HDFS-1965, it turns out that the reference-counting done in WritableRpcEngine.ClientCache doesn't map one-to-one with open TCP connections. This means that it's easy to accidentally leave TCP connections open longer than expected so long as the client has any other connections open at all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15240-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 00:22:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7A256FD0 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78157 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 00:22:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78048 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 00:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78039 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 00:22:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:22:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2772D4F24 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 00:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <563441287.32435.1305937307793.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037193#comment-13037193 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7287: ------------------------------------- With HDFS-1932 committed the above manual test now passes. But, one more issue I think before we can commit this: in this test case it doesn't print any warning about use of the deprecated flag. Would that be easy to address or is it better to do in another jira? > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15241-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 00:50:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F67962D1 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97701 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 00:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97666 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 00:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97652 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 00:50:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:50:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F189D4661 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 00:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 00:49:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2106254479.32564.1305938988058.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch Updated patch which prints a warning message when the deprecated key is accessed. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15242-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 01:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBFFC6EED for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 01:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30595 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 01:54:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30544 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 01:54:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30536 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 01:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 01:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 01:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7588DD40F1 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 01:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 01:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <594900281.32665.1305942827478.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1185800002.15672.1298625818523.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7156) getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037223#comment-13037223 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7156: ------------------------------------------ Red Hat has released a fix for this as part of RHEL 6.1: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html . > getpwuid_r is not thread-safe on RHEL6 > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7156 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: RHEL 6.0 "Santiago" > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt, hadoop-7156.txt > > > Due to the following bug in SSSD, functions like getpwuid_r are not thread-safe in RHEL 6.0 if sssd is specified in /etc/nsswitch.conf (as it is by default): > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/640 > This causes many fetch failures in the case that the native libraries are available, since the SecureIO functions call getpwuid_r as part of fstat. By enabling -Xcheck:jni I get the following trace on JVM crash: > *** glibc detected *** /mnt/toolchain/JDK6u20-64bit/bin/java: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000003575741d23 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3575675676] > /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2(_nss_sss_getpwuid_r+0x11b)[0x7fe716cb42cb] > /lib64/libc.so.6(getpwuid_r+0xdd)[0x35756a5dfd] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15243-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 12:41:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6428649EE for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31814 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 12:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31228 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 12:41:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30932 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 12:41:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:41:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:41:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABBAD5BFE for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:40:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1864133464.33353.1305981605498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6846) Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037362#comment-13037362 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6846: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #673 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/673/]) > Scripts for building Hadoop 0.22.0 release > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6846 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6846.patch, release-scripts.tar.gz > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15244-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 12:42:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44DD64A5C for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33604 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 12:42:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33569 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 12:42:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33561 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 12:42:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:42:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:41:59 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4543FD5C32 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 12:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:40:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <79119287.33400.1305981607280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <291388771.11207.1305319187380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7291) Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037371#comment-13037371 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7291: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #673 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/673/]) > Update Hudson job not to run test-contrib > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7291 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7291 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7291-2.patch, HADOOP-7291-3.patch, HADOOP-7291.patch > > > The test-contrib target was removed in HADOOP-7137, which causes the Hudson job to fail. The build file doesn't execute test-contrib so I suspect the Hudson job needs to be updated to not call ant with the test-contrib target. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15245-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 18:47:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E13D24ACC for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97794 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 18:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97692 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 18:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97683 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 18:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF7BD57B0 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1686068557.33696.1306003607766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6605) Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037435#comment-13037435 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-6605: -------------------------------------------- Most of the time, i do side-by-side jdk installations to see which jdk is better. Many times, default jdk location is not preferred, Esp. as Allen mentioned sometimes /usr/bin/java isn't Sun Java. IMO, having .hadooprc file might be useful thing. Again, this file should be part of the bundle. This is kind of creating virtual environment for hadoop installation. This will solve multiple version problem also. Sometimes, it is hard to know which jdk binary hadoop is using, part of the reason is one can set JAVA_HOME at multiple locations like shell, hadoop-env.sh etc Having consistent location for setting this also helpful. One has to do ps cmd to figure out which location java is running from. Also, having a helper script like checkhadoopenv.sh should let the user know its current virtual environment. This will be useful for debugging purpose. I think, we should have one consistent way to set environment for hadoop this avoids user confusion. Main point: set all the environment variables required for hadoop in .hadooprc file defaulting to certain values. User can edit this file depending on his/her case may be. Defaulting env can be a tricky thing if user didn't set in .hadooprc. If this happens, we should let user know that he/she should update .hadooprc file for the missing env variables. This file (.hadooprc) is user editable. We should document and make it the only place users can tinker their environment. This avoids most of the confusion. Do you agree? > Add JAVA_HOME detection to hadoop-config > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6605 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chad Metcalf > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6605.patch, hadoop-6605-1.patch, hadoop-6605-2.patch > > > The commands that source hadoop-config.sh currently bail with an error if JAVA_HOME is not set. Let's detect JAVA_HOME (from a list of locations on various OS types) if JAVA_HOME is not already set by hadoop-env.sh or the environment. This way users don't have to manually configure it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15246-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 19:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE0354A9D for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25101 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 19:31:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25069 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 19:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25061 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 19:31:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E62D5DE0 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1852460677.33713.1306006247725.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037437#comment-13037437 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7307: ---------------------------------------- Todd, your mention of the lack of internet access and their objections to references to Dr Who appearing in their logs tells me that your customers are the Daleks, whose Datacenter-7 is a 150 Exabyte facility on the dark side of the moon. I know this as we had to deal with the hardware issues of heat dissipation in servers deployed in a vacuum, and the logistics of a facility designed to be maintained by three-wheeled lifeforms which lack the ability to handle hot-swap disks or the little clips on CAT-5 cables. I propose we meet the needs of these valued customers and also the Cybermen by making the name of the Time Lord configurable. They can set {{hadoop.timelord=The Master}} to their hadoop-site file, and be happy. Personally, I'd focus on the more pressing issue, namely that the Faster Than Light network backbone really confuses the Job Tracker, as it is getting completion notifications coming before the work has actually been scheduled... > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15247-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 21 21:43:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F59A422B for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16129 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 21:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16085 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2011 21:43:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16077 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2011 21:43:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 21:43:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 May 2011 21:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6580ED6FF3 for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1834598058.33825.1306014167412.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037460#comment-13037460 ] Bharath Mundlapudi commented on HADOOP-7310: -------------------------------------------- +1 to solution A. IMO, Trash is a system wide abstract. Placing /trash/username is cleaner and permissions are honored like USERA can't delete/peek USERB's trash content. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15249-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 05:15:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F73A6BE8 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97875 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97591 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96490 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 05:15:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919B4D6F8B for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7318 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15248-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 05:15:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57E1D6BF9 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97949 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97341 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96343 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 05:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1C8D6F8F for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1088369686.34073.1306041287697.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7318.txt > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15250-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 05:15:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8226C0B for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97933 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97597 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96396 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 05:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E4D6F91 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <383352387.34075.1306041287775.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15251-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 05:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A2B463A3 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99946 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99837 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99827 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 05:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:17:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F8DD6007 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1998997027.34081.1306041407410.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7318.txt oops, fixed test case to use constant throughout. > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15252-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 05:53:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E5FD69AB for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7066 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:53:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6829 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 05:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6817 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 05:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F05D645B for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jake Mannix (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <521209480.34101.1306043567746.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037511#comment-13037511 ] Jake Mannix commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- -1, this change would incompatibly break all productions systems where the cluster admin has nagios scripts monitoring log files for "dr.who". Please wait until 1.0 for this change. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15253-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 06:47:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0122369C6 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 06:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19971 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 06:47:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19905 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 06:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18941 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 06:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 06:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 06:47:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771CD6BF3 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 06:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 06:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1082683490.34139.1306046807420.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15254-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 07:06:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1488963A3 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27069 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 07:06:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26775 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 07:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26724 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 07:05:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:05:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797D8D6F5D for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 07:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1481989289.34157.1306047887494.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037517#comment-13037517 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7287: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479976/hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch against trunk revision 1125221. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/496//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/496//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/496//console This message is automatically generated. > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15255-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 07:29:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7A126BD7 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48869 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 07:29:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48808 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 07:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48315 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 07:29:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B02AD63A1 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <998819878.34172.1306049327435.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037523#comment-13037523 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7318: ------------------------------------- +1 good catch > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15256-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 08:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68D256CE6 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67868 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 08:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67816 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 08:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67808 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 08:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559E1D6EB1 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2031438916.34213.1306053107347.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037533#comment-13037533 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7310: ------------------------------------- Solution A sounds good to me as well. This also has the nice property that you can set a single quota on all trash. With federation do you expect that trash will live on the same NN as home directories? If home directories span multiple NNs (probably uncommon) then it seems like you would want trash to as well, and this is more complex for admins when Trash is not a child of the user directory. In terms of compatibility, post this change, I assume /user/joe/.Trash be considered a regular directory, and admins can move the contents to /Trash/joe as part of the upgrade. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15257-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 09:34:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3C266DAD for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98243 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98215 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98207 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 09:34:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:34:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:34:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA790D69A5 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2013629184.34255.1306056827760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Assignee: Eli Collins Summary: Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream (was: Add javadoc comments to FSDataInputStream.getWrappedStream public method.) Might as well do this for all public methods in both FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15258-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 09:38:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB266DCE for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98787 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98753 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98745 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 09:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F72D6AAB for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <731792007.34262.1306057067537.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7316-1.patch Patch attached. Also fixes a couple minor javadoc errors in FsCommand and Command. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15259-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 09:38:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BA136DE3 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99103 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99071 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 09:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99060 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 09:38:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9318AD6AAE for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2108030996.34264.1306057067599.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15260-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 16:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2158E604C for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68504 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 16:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68459 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 16:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68451 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 16:28:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:28:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EDFD7F32 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 16:27:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <798906530.34565.1306081668016.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-7316: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) The newly visible method should be annotated with interface audience private. Why was it necessary to make this method public instead of package visible? All testing should be able to use that. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15261-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 18:57:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B2E46BA8 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67073 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 18:57:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67031 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 18:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67023 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 18:57:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:57:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:57:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC8CD7BE9 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 18:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1702529409.34652.1306090607380.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037644#comment-13037644 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7310: ---------------------------------------- Could we perhaps just make the trash prefix configurable in the same vain as {{mapreduce.jobtracker.staging.root.dir}}? I'm thinking some configurable path onto which "${user.name}/.Trash" would be appended. This way admins who wanted to could set the prefix to "{{/user}}", and thereby retain the current location of the trash directories, and admins who wanted a single directory for the trash at the root could set it to "{{/Trash}}", much like Sanjay's proposed solution A above. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15262-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 22 20:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C87A659A for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4073 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4043 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4035 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994F4D70D4 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1251822328.34737.1306097447624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7319) Coarse-grained dynamic configuration changes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Coarse-grained dynamic configuration changes -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7319 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7319 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Reporter: Ted Yu HADOOP-7001 introduced mechanism for performing dynamic configuration changes where reconfigureProperty()/reconfigurePropertyImpl() only notifies single property change. Normally, components which use ReconfigurableBase would involve several related properties whose update should be done atomically. This JIRA provides coarse-grained dynamic configuration changes with the following benefits: 1. consistency updating related properties dynamically 2. reduction of lock contention when multiple properties are changed in proximity -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15263-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 00:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A44B268DD for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6929 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6902 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6894 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824D3D8263 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 00:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1824798075.34861.1306112328530.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037686#comment-13037686 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7146: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12479955/hadoop-7146.txt against trunk revision 1125221. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/501//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/501//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/501//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15264-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 00:59:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D32F468F0 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7219 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7131 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6969 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 00:59:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBECD8265 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 00:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1274333081.34863.1306112328577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037687#comment-13037687 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7318: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480018/hadoop-7318.txt against trunk revision 1125221. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/503//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/503//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/503//console This message is automatically generated. > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15265-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 01:31:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5696D60 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 01:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37195 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 01:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37148 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 01:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37140 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 01:31:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 01:31:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 01:31:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6024FD8864 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 01:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 01:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1517848555.34925.1306114247390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk and branch 22. Thanks Todd! > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15266-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 02:35:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46A394A8E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 02:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75244 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 02:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75168 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 02:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75160 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 02:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 02:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 02:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60297D83F1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <765057651.34961.1306118087390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037700#comment-13037700 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #615 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/615/]) > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15267-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 03:11:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8EA54F04 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88470 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 03:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88264 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 03:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88245 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 03:11:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:11:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:11:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBB2D8B90 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 03:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 03:10:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <135529210.35067.1306120248765.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037705#comment-13037705 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------------ Does this actually still happen in trunk or is there an edge-case where the username doesn't get resolved? > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15268-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 05:15:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94B1E4B33 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51860 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 05:15:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51818 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 05:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51763 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 05:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56479D860C for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 05:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <708223499.35202.1306127687350.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037737#comment-13037737 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7146: ------------------------------------ Todd, kudos for finding this and how to fix it, and also to Aaron for nailing the TestDFSStorageStateRecovery problem. I'd like to suggest a more structured fix: 1. Move the "readSelector = Selector.open()" statement from Listener() to the Reader() ctor, and change the ctor to have no arguments. 2. In Reader.run(), wrap the whole method in a try/finally context, with your five-line fix in the "finally" clause, and make it conditional on (readSelector != null). 3. In Responder.run(), similarly wrap the whole method in a try/finally context, with your five-line fix in the "finally" clause, and make it conditional on (writeSelector != null). I would have liked to recommend putting the "readSelector = Selector.open()" [Reader] and "writeSelector = Selector.open()" [Responder] statements at the beginning of their respective run() methods, so the try/finally context would really be structured right, but I'm not sure its okay in the Responder context -- it looks like some of its methods may invoke writeSelector without the run() being running. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15269-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 09:43:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 970E647F9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43893 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 09:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43868 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 09:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43860 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 09:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB08D8687 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <139208930.35610.1306143767507.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037821#comment-13037821 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #55 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/55/]) HADOOP-7318. svn merge -c 1126287 from trunk eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126288 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestMD5Hash.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/docs * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22 * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/MD5Hash.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestSequenceFile.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15270-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 09:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAE124803 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44158 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 09:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44122 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 09:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44114 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 09:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDFBD8685 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <459327566.35608.1306143767450.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <2117896899.24772.1305762047299.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7302) webinterface.private.actions should not be in common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037820#comment-13037820 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7302: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #55 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/55/]) > webinterface.private.actions should not be in common > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7302 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Ari Rabkin > Assignee: Ari Rabkin > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7302.patch > > > The comment in -defaults says that webinterface.private.actions applies to both NN and JT. This is wrong. This option is only referenced via the JobTracker. > I propose to delete it here, and file a second issue in MAPREDUCE for renaming the option (deprecating the existing name.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15271-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 12:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F0F84FA0 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43520 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 12:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43481 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 12:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43473 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 12:31:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:31:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD76D9205 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1408573578.35806.1306153847770.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1212537303.34070.1306041287593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7318) MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037909#comment-13037909 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7318: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #697 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/697/]) HADOOP-7318. MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns. Contributed by Todd Lipcon eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126287 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/TestMD5Hash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/MD5Hash.java > MD5Hash factory should reset the digester it returns > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7318 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7318 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7318.txt, hadoop-7318.txt > > > Currently the getDigest() method in MD5Hash does not reset the digester it returns. Since it's a thread-local, this means that a previous aborted usage of the same digester could leave some state around. For example, if the secondary namenode receives an IOException while transfering the image, and does another image transfer with the same thread, it will think it has received an invalid digest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15272-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 14:47:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26BFF4D03 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19369 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 14:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19335 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 14:47:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19327 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 14:47:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:47:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:47:33 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC30D9F31 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:46:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1455428770.36108.1306162013114.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7208.patch > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Attachments: HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15273-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 14:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D3834462 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30239 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 14:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30201 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 14:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30193 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 14:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCCD9195 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands --------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7320 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15274-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 15:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44B0F42D3 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57807 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57771 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57759 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 15:02:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:02:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368DAD9603 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <333526277.36147.1306162909220.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15275-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 15:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD8374BC1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96199 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96131 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96057 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 15:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99578D9EF3 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1672571552.36183.1306164227624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13037989#comment-13037989 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7208: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480117/HADOOP-7208.patch against trunk revision 1126287. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/504//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/504//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/504//console This message is automatically generated. > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15276-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 15:52:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B25544B9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51462 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51416 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 15:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51182 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 15:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CF5D9AA2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "jiraposter@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1838691526.36239.1306165907679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <467948518.30516.1305901367779.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7314) Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038002#comment-13038002 ] jiraposter@reviews.apache.org commented on HADOOP-7314: ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/775/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for hadoop-common and hadoop-mapreduce. Summary ------- As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. This addresses bug HADOOP-7314. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 Diffs ----- trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/DNSToSwitchMapping.java 1125067 trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/ScriptBasedMapping.java 1125067 trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/net/StaticMapping.java 1125067 trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/net/TestScriptBasedMapping.java 1125067 trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/CachedDNSToSwitchMapping.java 1125067 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/775/diff Testing ------- Thanks, Jeffrey > Add support for throwing UnknownHostException when a host doesn't resolve > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7314 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7314 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Assignee: Jeffrey Naisbitt > Attachments: HADOOP-7314.patch > > > As part of MAPREDUCE-2489, we need support for having the resolve methods (for DNS mapping) throw UnknownHostExceptions. (Currently, they hide the exception). Since the existing 'resolve' method is ultimately used by several other locations/components, I propose we add a new 'resolveValidHosts' method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15277-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A259E4BDC for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38851 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38824 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38816 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCEED9FE9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <192274156.36401.1306168787577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15278-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDD124BED for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39061 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39009 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38951 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06D3D9FED for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <31932799.36405.1306168787719.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15279-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:40:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E08034BFD for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39360 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39331 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39310 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:40:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72012D9FE5 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1911286635.36397.1306168787463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash4.patch I had forgot to do "git add .."; the new tests are now part of the patch. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15280-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F23EE46CF for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73671 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73615 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73559 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4600D9739 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1184135421.36448.1306169687669.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038040#comment-13038040 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480126/trash4.patch against trunk revision 1126287. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/505//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/505//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/505//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/505//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15281-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 16:55:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A859046E1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74027 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73978 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 16:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73962 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 16:55:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45562D9754 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <813155626.36466.1306169688280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7316: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: documentation Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature) > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15282-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 17:12:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E2E04163 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93308 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93280 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93272 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 17:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:12:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:12:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C785D9EE2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <989015970.36506.1306170707375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <531829213.32234.1305934307559.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7316) Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7316: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7316-2.patch Thanks Owen. Updated patch attached. I marked both FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream#getWrappedStream LimitedPrivate to HDFS. The addition of FSDataInputStream#getWrappedStream mirrors the same method in FSDataOutputStream. Both live in common but are just used for HDFS tests, which is why they are not package visible. Could also expose these via a test adapter class but I think the annotation is sufficient. > Add public javadocs to FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7316 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jonathan Hsieh > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7316-1.patch, hadoop-7316-2.patch > > > This is a method made public for testing. In comments in HADOOP-7301 after commit, adding javadoc comments was requested. This is a follow up jira to address it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15283-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 17:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 541934CEA for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20682 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20561 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20548 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 17:24:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30434D962A for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <147164333.36596.1306171428194.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6671c.patch HADOOP-6671c.patch uses the maven native:javah mojo to generate the javah stuff. This solves the need tools.jar issue. I've also moved all the native autoreconf/configure/make to happen under the BUILD directory (target/). I've done this before for the documentation generation. This makes all files generated by the build to happen under target/ Still jdiff invocation is missing > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15284-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 17:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBEC54515 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35147 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35118 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35110 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25B2D9C60 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <187366143.36661.1306172027661.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038082#comment-13038082 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480134/HADOOP-6671c.patch against trunk revision 1126287. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 18 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/506//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15285-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 18:47:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5D642D9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 18:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73023 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 18:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72992 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 18:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72984 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 18:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 18:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 18:47:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54591D9DB6 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Roko Kruze (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1472612857.36898.1306176407342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7321) The link to the documentation on the hadoop common page is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The link to the documentation on the hadoop common page is broken ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7321 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7321 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: documentation Reporter: Roko Kruze Currently the following link is broken for the documentation: http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/stable/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15286-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 19:03:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E19D44EFE for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6963 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:03:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6906 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:03:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6898 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 19:03:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D31D9578 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1728938569.36954.1306177367868.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6508) Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu resolved HADOOP-6508. ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 > Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6508 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: CompositeContext-solution.png, CompositeContext.png > > > In our clusters, when we use CompositeContext with two contexts, second context gets wrong values. > This problem is consistent on 500 (and above) node cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15287-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 19:54:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AFB34867 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1304 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1273 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1265 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AFED9B68 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1050959151.37070.1306180427483.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7320.patch > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15288-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 19:54:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 181A9487E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1588 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1551 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1519 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 19:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09EED9B7A for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1013737498.37086.1306180427917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15289-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 20:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B724CB0 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41452 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41425 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41417 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 20:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEB2DA4E8 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1911748846.37160.1306181627774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038182#comment-13038182 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7320: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480149/HADOOP-7320.patch against trunk revision 1126287. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFsShellReturnCode +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/507//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/507//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/507//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15290-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 20:34:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CD5542A1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74041 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:34:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73994 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:34:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73943 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 20:34:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:34:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C2DDAC8B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <143464855.37251.1306182827692.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk and branch 22. Thanks, Aaron! > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15291-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 20:54:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31C9949BD for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21170 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21137 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 20:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21111 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 20:54:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:54:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E267CDA4CC for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <573778160.37365.1306184027924.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038220#comment-13038220 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #616 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/616/]) HADOOP-7287. Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser and Tools. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126719 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfigurationDeprecation.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/test-fake-default.xml > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15292-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A739F40EB for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10140 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10109 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10101 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831FEDA1BE for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1462758028.37472.1306186307533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7320-2.patch Fix the test that failed > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15293-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:36:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6CE4A65 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14701 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14598 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14543 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:36:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:36:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB223DA387 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <769883795.37494.1306186547763.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038247#comment-13038247 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-7310: --------------------------------------- bq. Could we perhaps just make the trash prefix configurable in the same vain as mapreduce.jobtracker.staging.root.dir This is solution B. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15294-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B86B54B21 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17994 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17970 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17962 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C641DA478 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1695574627.37499.1306186787506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038249#comment-13038249 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- - Looks like new files need license headers. - there's an empty tearDown method - is TestViewFsTrash.TestLFS used? > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15295-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:40:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFECD4B2C for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18251 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18179 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18063 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A554DA47A for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <144427131.37501.1306186787563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038250#comment-13038250 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7310: ------------------------------------- If we go with a config, can we use a format string like "/user/%s/.Trash"? In my experience, the semantics of mapreduce.jobtracker.staging.root.dir have confused many users. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15296-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:43:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D5CD4BED for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24089 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24048 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24040 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:36 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DC0DA5FF for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <144701422.37543.1306186976068.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038254#comment-13038254 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6929: --------------------------------------- This isn't the right approach. In particular, you don't want to put class names in configuration and certainly don't want the new SecurityContext to *replace* the current one. We want to use the annotations if they exist and fall back on other mechanisms when they don't. {code} public abstract class SecurityInfo { public abstract KerberofInfo getKerberosInfo(Class protocol); public abstract TokenInfo getTokenInfo(Class protocol); } public class SecurityUtil { private static ServiceLoader securityInfoProviders = new ServiceLoader(SecurityInfo.class); public static KerberosInfo getKerberosInfo(Class protocol) { for(SecurityInfo provider: securityInfoProviders) { Class result = provider.getKerberosInfo(protocol); if (result != null) return result; } return null; } public static TokenInfo getTokenInfo(Class protocol) {... } } {code} The Hadoop jar can register the AnnotatedSecurityInfo as the default. If we wish to implement more than one in the default jar, we can define a StandardSecurityInfo that first checks AnnotatedSecurityInfo and then falls back to the second one. > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15297-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:43:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C6E4BF8 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24332 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24281 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24169 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:36 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285D9DA60F for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2128265590.37545.1306186976161.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038255#comment-13038255 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #56 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/56/]) HADOOP-7287. Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser and Tools. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126724 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfigurationDeprecation.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/test-fake-default.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15298-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:43:39 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB1504C0F for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24560 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24521 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24479 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:43:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:43:37 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9DADA617 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <314002947.37550.1306186976371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038256#comment-13038256 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7320: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480166/HADOOP-7320-2.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 10 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/508//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/508//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/508//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15299-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:45:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F1624FE2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27044 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27014 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27006 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D874DA6B8 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2019813364.37554.1306187087379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <51041940.28155.1305838907965.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7310) Trash location needs to be revisited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038257#comment-13038257 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7310: ---------------------------------------- bq. This is solution B. Good point. :P Please interpret my comment, then, as pointing out that making this change optionally backward compatible is pretty trivial, so why not? Some admins will be unhappy about this incompatible change, while few if any will be unhappy about an extra configuration variable they need not concern themselves with. Also, +1 to Todd's suggestion of a format string versus straight prefix. > Trash location needs to be revisited > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7310 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7310 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15300-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:47:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACB364F4B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30454 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30425 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:47:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30417 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:47:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:47:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0CCDA807 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <73001203.37562.1306187207508.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038259#comment-13038259 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7208: ------------------------------------- - please use spaces, not tabs for indentation - should probably remove the comment "dummy hash code" - in tests, please use assertEquals instead of assertTrue with an == condition. Same for the false assertion - to illustrate the bug, does DummySocketFactory need to override anything at all? I think it could just be an empty subclass. Also, the attached javadoc doesn't represent what it does > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15301-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:58:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61F9E4B4C for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60224 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60184 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60176 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:58:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699CEDAB6E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7322 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: 1. When error happens it will throw IOException 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. Signature: File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15302-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 21:58:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87AB04B85 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60872 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:58:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60811 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 21:58:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60647 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 21:58:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:58:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6BDDAB70 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2045123227.37594.1306187867498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038265#comment-13038265 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7307: --------------------------------------- Allen, it only happens in the web ui when there isn't a better auth module plugged in. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15303-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFC83482B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67545 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67513 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67505 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:02:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE7DDACA9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1906682438.37613.1306188107512.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038267#comment-13038267 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7320: ------------------------------------- - Can you explain the changes with regard to RawLocalFileSystem vs LocalFileSystem in TestFsShellReturnCode? I'm not sure I follow what's going on here. - typo "pathson" -> "paths on" for Rename - maybe rename the outer "Copy" class to "CopyCommands" since it's just a container? Also, should it really be extending FsCommand since it is not itself a command? (I realize these are left over from HADOOP-7251... can address in a separate JIRA if you prefer) > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15304-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:24:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 234604FD1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3392 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3362 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3353 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:24:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1643FDA3AD for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:23:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <714303163.37672.1306189428087.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6929) RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038279#comment-13038279 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6929: --------------------------------- bq. In particular, you don't want to put class names in configuration This is a pervasive anti-pattern used in hadoop all over the place, HADOOP-7150 is supposed to address that. bq. and certainly don't want the new SecurityContext to replace the current one. Agreed. This is a major flaw of the current patch, though the flawed mechanism is still workable if the new security info implements the fallback mechanism. bq. private static ServiceLoader securityInfoProviders = new ServiceLoader(SecurityInfo.class); The usage should be: {code} ServiceLoader securityInfoProviders = ServiceLoader.load(SecurityInfo.class); {code} > RPC should have a way to pass Security information other than protocol annotations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6929 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, security > Reporter: Sharad Agarwal > Assignee: Sharad Agarwal > Attachments: Hadoop-6929_v1.patch > > > Currently Hadoop RPC allows protocol annotations as the only way to pass security information. This becomes a problem if protocols are generated and not hand written. For example protocols generated via Avro and passed over Avro tunnel (AvroRpcEngine.java) can't pass the security information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15305-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:26:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AACA412E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6812 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6779 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6770 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:26:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:26:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C161DA45B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <739161311.37680.1306189547439.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038280#comment-13038280 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7320: ------------------------------------- bq. Can you explain the changes with regard to RawLocalFileSystem vs LocalFileSystem in TestFsShellReturnCode? I'm not sure I follow what's going on here. It was confusing for me too. The property fs.file.impl is supposed to be a LocalFileSystem, but the test was defining it as a RawLocalFileSystem. Calls to FileSystem.getLocal() instantiate the fs.file.impl class and then cast it to a LocalFileSystem (runtime kaboom). Using the wrong class accidentally worked until this patch. I'll address the last 2 bullet points on this jira. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15306-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:40:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 065134A85 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21609 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21543 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21535 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:40:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:40:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC9DDA91F for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <367060043.37743.1306190388962.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch Change configuration directory from $PREFIX/conf to $PREFIX/etc/hadoop per Owen's recommendation. For RPM/deb, it will use /etc/hadoop as default, and create symlink for $PREFIX/etc/hadoop point to /etc/hadoop. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15307-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:42:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C87D04B53 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30414 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:42:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30373 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:42:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30365 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:42:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:42:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:42:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EA7DAA47 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:41:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Amr Awadallah (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1126777029.37782.1306190508815.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038290#comment-13038290 ] Amr Awadallah commented on HADOOP-6255: --------------------------------------- I am out of office on an international business trip this week. I will be slower than usual in responding to emails. If this is urgent then please call my cell phone (or send an SMS), otherwise I will reply to your email when I get back. Thanks for your patience, -- amr > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15308-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:46:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1003A4822 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38581 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38549 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38541 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:46:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:46:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14F3DABF6 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:45:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1340967858.37828.1306190748854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6255: -------------------------------- Comment: was deleted (was: I am out of office on an international business trip this week. I will be slower than usual in responding to emails. If this is urgent then please call my cell phone (or send an SMS), otherwise I will reply to your email when I get back. Thanks for your patience, -- amr ) > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15309-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:52:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B5C46D1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45922 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45893 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45881 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:52:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:52:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0DADAE25 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <725078979.37843.1306191107967.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7259. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I just committed this. > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15310-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:54:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D73E147D9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53964 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:54:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53924 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53914 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:54:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:54:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7FDDAF88 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <252913023.37856.1306191228048.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038300#comment-13038300 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480177/HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 27 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 3 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/509//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/509//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/509//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/509//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15311-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 22:56:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58467480E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54658 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:56:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54618 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54609 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CD6DA034 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7323 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur Fix For: 0.22.0 When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15312-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:06:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B96564045 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63870 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:06:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63812 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63711 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DDFDA34A for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <108701884.37911.1306191947540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <298707236.22802.1301530265774.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7215) RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-7215: ------------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) The patch is committed. > RPC clients must connect over a network interface corresponding to the host name in the client's kerberos principal key > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7215 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7215 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7215.1.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.2xx.patch, HADOOP-7215.3.trunk.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch, HADOOP-7215.debug.patch > > > HDFS-7104 introduced a change where RPC server matches client's hostname with the hostname specified in the client's Kerberos principal name. RPC client binds the socket to a random local address, which might not match the hostname specified in the principal name. This results authorization failure of the client at the server. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15313-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7A7341D3 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73023 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72996 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72987 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3962DA50C for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <982284402.37932.1306192427666.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7320-3.patch * Fix "pathson" misspelling. * Rename Copy to CopyCommands, ditto for Move. * Removed "extends" from Copy/MoveCommands. It was a leftover from when I had common methods in the class, prior to moving them to CommandWithDestination. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15314-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:20:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAECB48BE for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78139 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78112 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78104 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:20:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8236EDA6D4 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1082485394.37949.1306192787530.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038314#comment-13038314 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7259: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit #697 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Commit/697/]) HADOOP-7259. Contrib modules should include the build.properties from the enclosing hadoop directory. (omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126801 Files : * /hadoop/mapreduce/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/mapreduce/trunk/src/contrib/build-contrib.xml > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15315-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:24:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4730F493B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81409 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81362 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81354 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64303DA7FA for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2096537703.37957.1306193027407.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038316#comment-13038316 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7320: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480183/HADOOP-7320-3.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 10 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/510//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15316-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:26:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD676495E for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83320 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83287 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83279 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:26:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849A3DA84B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1245077827.37960.1306193147539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038318#comment-13038318 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------------------- Luke, I don't know how you can make decisions based only on one comment. I don't think Gary (the only one who cared) would be happy with the solution, when he sees it, as he was asking for "a phased transition" to metrics2 for HBase. I sure missed your email. Let's see how we can use metrics2 instead of the original metrics, before we attempt option #3, which is make both metrics frameworks work. Could you please elaborate or post links on how to get metrics2 run. We use Ganglia. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15317-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6885497B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83771 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83739 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83729 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:28:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:28:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57259DA8AF for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <775122501.37965.1306193267353.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7323.patch The codec alias is taken from the Codec short class name (classname without package) after removing the 'Codec' postfix if present, else the full short class name is used as alias. The patch adds to the CompressionCodecFactory.getCodecByClassName()method an alias lookup fallback if the codec class has not been found (this preserves existing behavior). The alias lookup is case-insensitive. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15318-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD9034FBA for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88102 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:40:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88047 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:40:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88032 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:40:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:40:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77935DAB70 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1727435655.37974.1306193987486.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch Same $PREFIX/etc/hadoop configuration change as trunk but for 0.20 security branch. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15319-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E83144005 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89875 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89824 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89723 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:44:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:44:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A32DACC0 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:43:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <557060708.38037.1306194228679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038323#comment-13038323 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480186/HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/511//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15320-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 23 23:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 633A04665 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92830 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92802 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92794 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5615CDAE1B for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <16042182.38051.1306194647349.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038326#comment-13038326 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- This looks good. The only nit I noticed is that the javadoc on codecsByName in CompressionCodecFactory is incorrect. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15321-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 00:17:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06D1F49F6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13963 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13926 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:17:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13918 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 00:17:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:17:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D615DA393 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <991224987.38069.1306196207379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038331#comment-13038331 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------------------- I should've mentioned, I haven't been following metrics closely, so any help from you, Luke, is greatly appreciated. > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15322-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 00:19:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A090443C6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16456 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16426 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16418 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 00:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2E8DA406 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2349015.38074.1306196327378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038332#comment-13038332 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- bq. Luke, I don't know how you can make decisions based only on one comment. Well, it was approved by Y dev/ops, of course :). The post was sent to both general and common-dev. People have many weeks to voice their opinions. The main consumers of the metrics system are ops and perf guys. I guess that they don't have strong opinions on how it should work as long as it can be easily made to work. I'm sure that you heard of lazy consensus. bq. I don't think Gary (the only one who cared) would be happy with the solution, when he sees it, as he was asking for "a phased transition" to metrics2 for HBase. #2 the OP clearly outlined the pros and cons of the approach. HBase will continue sending their specific metrics with metrics1 and Hadoop (common, hdfs, mapreduce) will send hadoop framework metrics with metrics2. i.e., in the transition period, ops would need to configure both hadoop-metrics.properties for HBase and hadoop-metrics2.properties for Hadoop. It's a working solution for the transition period. bq. Could you please elaborate or post links on how to get metrics2 run. We use Ganglia. The syntax to configure a consumer/sink for metrics (in the hadoop-metrics2.properties): {noformat} [service-name].sink.[sink-name].[option]=value {noformat} Some examples are included in the trunk conf/hadoop-metrics2.properties for common and hdfs, as well as the [configuration section|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2#Configuration] of the [design doc|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HADOOP-6728-MetricsV2]. An example of metrics2 config using ganglia (3.0.x or 3.1.x?) would be: {noformat} *.ganglia.class=org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.sink.ganglia.Ganglia31 *.period=10 namenode.sink.ganglia.address=localhost:8649 jobtracker.sink.ganglia.address=localhost:8649 tasktracker.sink.ganglia.address=localhost:8649 {noformat} Of course, the org.apache.hadoop.metrics2.sink.ganglia.* classes don't exist yet. We'll have to implement them (sink examples can be found in the FileSink or the EchoPlugin in the design doc.). > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15323-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 00:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A08FC4AC2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20161 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20122 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20114 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 00:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648E2DA4CA for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956630411.38079.1306196567408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1145070693.28819.1305845387456.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7311) Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038333#comment-13038333 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7311: --------------------------------- bq. I should've mentioned, I haven't been following metrics closely, so any help from you, Luke, is greatly appreciated. No problem. I'm committed to make the transition as painless as possible :) > Port remaining metrics v1 from trunk to branch-0.20-security > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7311 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7311 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.20.204.0 > > Attachments: metrics-0.20-security.patch > > > HADOOP-7190 added metrics packages/classes. This is a port from trunk to make them actually work for the security branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15324-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 00:47:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C71249B5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41816 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41789 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 00:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41774 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 00:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA51DA944 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <557825167.38099.1306198007453.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7324) Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Ganglia plugins for metrics v2 ------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7324 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7324 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: metrics Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 Although, all metrics in metrics v2 are exposed via the standard JMX mechanisms, there are a few users who prefer using Ganglia to collect metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15325-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 01:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC4B04694 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88782 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88756 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88748 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495EDA108 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1387497904.38167.1306200167539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brock Noland updated HADOOP-7325: --------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch Attached implements requested improvement. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15326-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 01:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEBC246B0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89435 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 01:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89397 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 01:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89389 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 01:23:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6BCDA105 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brock Noland (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: scripts Reporter: Brock Noland Priority: Minor Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: {code} $ hadoop -fs ls / {code} The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: {code} $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / Unrecognized option: -fs Could not create the Java virtual machine. {code} Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: {code} $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' {code} The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: {code} $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... {code} The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15327-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 03:10:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDD336EC6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60912 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 03:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60704 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 03:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60685 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 03:10:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:10:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:10:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4080DA8C2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 03:09:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1216005333.38264.1306206589865.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038365#comment-13038365 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------------ Hmm. That's sort of surprising. I would have expected the user name to get resolved to the user that is running the datanode when the built-in auth was being used. (Doesn't it default to the username of the user running the Java process everywhere else? Why would it be different for the HDFS web ui?) But that's also bad for what are hopefully obvious reasons though. FWIW, in Apache 0.20.2 and prior, we had dfs.web.ugi which looks like it defaulted to "webuser,webugi". I'm inclined to think that we likely need to bring this setting back and default it to either webuser or DrWho. It sounds like the default changed in 0.21, so this is a tricky one. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15328-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:16:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B3B36087 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80745 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:16:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80207 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79456 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693CDBD1C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:15:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <246913857.38570.1306224948547.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Moved] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley moved HDFS-1988 to HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------------ Component/s: (was: test) test Fix Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.22.0) 0.23.0 0.22.0 Key: HADOOP-7326 (was: HDFS-1988) Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop HDFS) > TestTrash infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > > Seems to have started failing recently in many commit builds as well as the last two nightly builds of 22: > https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch/51/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs/TestHDFSTrash/testTrashEmptier/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15329-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:22:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88C226184 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91502 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91458 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91449 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:22:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:22:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:22:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4660ADBF9C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:21:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2042948202.38587.1306225310284.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------- Description: This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). (was: Seems to have started failing recently in many commit builds as well as the last two nightly builds of 22: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-22-branch/51/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs/TestHDFSTrash/testTrashEmptier/) Assignee: Matt Foley Summary: TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash (was: TestTrash infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash) > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15330-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0FA1616D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6313 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:32:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6280 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:32:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6251 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:32:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:32:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1ADDB45F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7327 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 Reporter: Matt Foley Assignee: Matt Foley Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15331-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5B886EBE for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19408 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19348 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19340 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D43CDB86C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101847024.38638.1306226567509.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15332-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:43:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E51AF6EC9 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19608 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19578 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19444 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FC2DB869 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <504043202.38636.1306226567406.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7327-1.patch The problem is that the underlying implementation relies on File.list(), which returns null upon access error, rather than throwing IOException. (The underlying implementation can be hard to track down because of layering of FilterFileSystems, but for an example see RawLocalFileSystem.listStatus(Path).) We can't change that behavior, because it is defined by the Java io library. But at our FileSystem class level, it is appropriate to check for this condition at the point where FileSystem.listStatus() is about to generate a NullPointerException, and throw an IOException instead. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15333-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 08:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9527C6655 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34965 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34936 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 08:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34928 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 08:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630B3DBCE5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <706384435.38654.1306227167402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch The problem is that testTrashEmptier() naively counts all the objects in .Trash, but it needs to filter for only Trash checkpoint subdirectory objects, the same way Trash.expunge() does. This patch fixes the problem, and also cleans up some logging in the Trash class, to make it more useful in interpreting such situations. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15334-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 09:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 422EC6D5D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43965 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 09:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43903 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 09:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43636 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 09:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E45DDB272 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1493528378.38689.1306227887514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038462#comment-13038462 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7327: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480218/hadoop-7327-1.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/512//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/512//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/512//console This message is automatically generated. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15335-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 10:15:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9ED6BE8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43221 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 10:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43178 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 10:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43157 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 10:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E3ADBF1D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 10:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Give more information about a missing Serializer class ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7328 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria Fix For: 0.23.0 When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15336-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 11:01:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 860DD6C10 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9086 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8973 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8814 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 11:01:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68221DB00D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <770306368.38868.1306234848423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7328: -------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff Patch that adds a FATAL log when a null is about to be received for a requested serializer. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15337-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 11:01:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0697B6C80 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10475 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:01:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10436 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10334 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 11:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:01:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B461DB010 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <819320487.38871.1306234848567.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7328: -------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15338-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 11:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9592B6C74 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33735 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33701 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33692 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748BDDB46E for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <966968865.38887.1306235687474.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <187742091.8722.1305246647362.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7287) Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038505#comment-13038505 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7287: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #698 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/698/]) HADOOP-7287. Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser and Tools. Contributed by Aaron T. Myers. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126719 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/conf/Configuration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/conf/TestConfigurationDeprecation.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/test-fake-default.xml > Configuration deprecation mechanism doesn't work properly for GenericOptionsParser/Tools > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7287 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7287 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7287-still-broken.txt, hadoop-7287-testcase.txt, hadoop-7287-trunk.0.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.1.patch, hadoop-7287-trunk.2.patch > > > For example, you can't use -D options on the "hadoop fs" command line in order to specify the deprecated names of configuration options. The issue is that the ordering is: > - JVM starts > - GenericOptionsParser creates a Configuration object and calls set() for each of the options specified on command line > - DistributedFileSystem or other class eventually instantiates HdfsConfiguration which adds the deprecations > - Some class calls conf.get("new key") and sees the default instead of the version set on the command line -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15339-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 11:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C55E96C81 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34014 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33931 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33791 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 11:15:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860C3DB471 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1527859869.38889.1306235687545.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038506#comment-13038506 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7328: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480231/HADOOP-7328.r1.diff against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/513//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/513//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/513//console This message is automatically generated. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15340-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 11:25:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82811620D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48405 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:25:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48376 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 11:25:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48367 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 11:25:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:25:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:25:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A43DB778 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1940533552.38901.1306236287474.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038509#comment-13038509 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------------- Justifications: A LOG addition, does not require a test case addition/change. The other seemingly irrelevant change is a checkstyle fix, the line was using a tab char. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15341-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 12:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13AE56716 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69667 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 12:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69643 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 12:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69635 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 12:38:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:38:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B131BDB23C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1665568468.38996.1306240667722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038527#comment-13038527 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7259: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #676 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/676/]) HADOOP-7259. Contrib modules should include the build.properties from the enclosing hadoop directory. (omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126795 Files : * /hadoop/hdfs/trunk/src/contrib/build-contrib.xml * /hadoop/hdfs/trunk/CHANGES.txt > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15342-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 14:06:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9302A68B9 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25769 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:06:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25743 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25735 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 14:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820BADB679 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <865079863.39181.1306245947529.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7208-2.patch > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15343-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 14:08:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFD6D692F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27738 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27710 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:08:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27698 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 14:08:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:08:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:08:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAF6DB780 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1472928761.39188.1306246067646.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038569#comment-13038569 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7320: ------------------------------------- The patch problem is due to renaming Copy to CopyCommands per review comments. Subversion is generating a patch that it can't reapply. Namely that the patch deletes Copy, but the hunks for CopyCommands are relative to the Copy command. Should I regenerate the patch by svn removing and adding the renamed file? Since that will lose history (it's a very new file so maybe it doesn't matter), is there another way to generate the patch? > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15344-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 14:18:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 868946ABE for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49411 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49292 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49284 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF65DBE3A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1856569606.39247.1306246667451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15345-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 14:18:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5CFC6ACC for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49552 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49522 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49364 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 14:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8132DDBE3C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1088923721.39249.1306246667526.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15346-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 14:54:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 201256B46 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28769 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28720 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 14:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28658 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 14:54:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:54:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F56DB269 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1330323586.39358.1306248828606.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038599#comment-13038599 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7208: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480249/HADOOP-7208-2.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/514//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/514//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/514//console This message is automatically generated. > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15347-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 15:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7128F65D9 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30094 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 15:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30040 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 15:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30029 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 15:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418CDC6DB for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <684141003.39475.1306251168013.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6541) An Interactive Hadoop FS shell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6541: -------------------------------- Comment: was deleted (was: I will be out of office Apr 18-22, 2011. If you have anything urgent, please contact my manager Omer Trajman omer@cloudera.com. -- -- Alex Kozlov Solutions Architect Cloudera, Inc ) > An Interactive Hadoop FS shell > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6541 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6541 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: HADOOP-6541.2.patch, HADOOP-6541.3.patch, HADOOP-6541.4.patch, HADOOP-6541.5.patch, HADOOP-6541.6.patch, HADOOP-6541.patch > > > A shell that allows the user to execute multiple filesystem operations in a single JVM instance at a prompt. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15348-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 15:45:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B14DB6E97 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56479 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 15:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56438 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 15:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56430 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 15:45:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:45:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A68FDCC93 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:44:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <420270233.39525.1306251888301.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038636#comment-13038636 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7259: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #689 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/689/]) HADOOP-7259. Contrib modules should include the build.properties from the enclosing hadoop directory. (omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1126801 Files : * /hadoop/mapreduce/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/mapreduce/trunk/src/contrib/build-contrib.xml > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15349-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 17:34:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52D1E60CB for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75795 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75757 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75748 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 17:34:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:34:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBBEDC5B3 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:33:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1736248395.39771.1306258429176.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6349) Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038681#comment-13038681 ] Ismael Juma commented on HADOOP-6349: ------------------------------------- What is the status of this? Is anyone still working on it? > Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: William Kinney > Attachments: HADOOP-6349-TestFastLZCodec.patch, HADOOP-6349.patch, TestCodecPerformance.java, TestCodecPerformance.java, hadoop-6349-1.patch, hadoop-6349-2.patch, hadoop-6349-3.patch, hadoop-6349-4.patch, testCodecPerfResults.tsv > > > Per [HADOOP-4874|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4874], FastLZ is a good (speed, license) alternative to LZO. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15350-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 17:56:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C892C6BCC for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17310 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 17:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17261 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 17:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17253 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 17:56:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:56:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A934DCCD5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:55:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <4374891.39800.1306259748630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6349) Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038687#comment-13038687 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6349: ------------------------------------- I think this has largely been superceded by the recent work on Snappy > Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: William Kinney > Attachments: HADOOP-6349-TestFastLZCodec.patch, HADOOP-6349.patch, TestCodecPerformance.java, TestCodecPerformance.java, hadoop-6349-1.patch, hadoop-6349-2.patch, hadoop-6349-3.patch, hadoop-6349-4.patch, testCodecPerfResults.tsv > > > Per [HADOOP-4874|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4874], FastLZ is a good (speed, license) alternative to LZO. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15351-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:00:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A62B96FAF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23538 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23507 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23367 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:00:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:00:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:00:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F9ADCE96 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1718609519.39852.1306259988291.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6349) Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038691#comment-13038691 ] Ismael Juma commented on HADOOP-6349: ------------------------------------- Thanks, that's good to know. > Implement FastLZCodec for fastlz/lzo algorithm > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6349 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6349 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: William Kinney > Attachments: HADOOP-6349-TestFastLZCodec.patch, HADOOP-6349.patch, TestCodecPerformance.java, TestCodecPerformance.java, hadoop-6349-1.patch, hadoop-6349-2.patch, hadoop-6349-3.patch, hadoop-6349-4.patch, testCodecPerfResults.tsv > > > Per [HADOOP-4874|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4874], FastLZ is a good (speed, license) alternative to LZO. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15352-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:13:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD445641D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43969 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:13:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43941 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:13:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43933 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:13:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:13:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A477ADC2F4 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <902068360.39911.1306260767670.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7320-rename.patch This patch must be applied first to allow the real patch to rename Copy.java to CopyCommands.java. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15353-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B1146BA8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66425 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66386 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66378 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EC4DC7CD for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1537828972.39944.1306261487496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038701#comment-13038701 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7320: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480293/HADOOP-7320-rename.patch against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to cause Findbugs (version 1.3.9) to fail. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/515//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/515//console This message is automatically generated. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:31:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CABD64D5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74346 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:31:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74314 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:31:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74306 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:31:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:31:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:31:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617B5DC9BA for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <399132680.39974.1306261848394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- Attachment: mvn-layout2.sh HADOOP-6671d.patch Integrated checkstyle and findbugs, added option to skipDocs. Only thing missing is JDiff integration (which it seems a dead project and the Maven plugin does not seem to work properly). Is JDIFF required? Any other alternative? Maven goals: * clean * compile (-DcompileNative) * test (-DcompileNative, -Dtest=, -DskipTests) * package (-DcompileNative, -DskipDocs, -DskipTests | -Dtest=) * checkstyle:checkstyle * findbugs:findbugs > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:33:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BCAF6F18 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77606 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77469 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77457 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:33:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:33:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B11DCA5F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1944447565.39977.1306261967413.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038705#comment-13038705 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480296/mvn-layout2.sh against trunk revision 1126719. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/516//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:35:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 132B16310 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79691 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79532 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79524 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EBCDCB5B for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <211255432.40024.1306262088083.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038706#comment-13038706 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------- Hey Alejandro. Yep, we do use jdiff in order to detect incompatible changes between releases. Tom is one of the experts there. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:37:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 652E46369 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80948 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80903 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80895 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B446DCBFF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1167897674.40028.1306262207370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038708#comment-13038708 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------- Maybe instead of a new log, we could have the tasks throw a more useful exception? Also, would it be possible to detect this issue at submission time? That's much more user friendly than making the user look through failed task logs. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4E5B63DB for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83387 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83200 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83192 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:39:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C4DCC7D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1386606355.40032.1306262327595.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <164637914.38616.1306225908771.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7327) FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038709#comment-13038709 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7327: ------------------------------------- This looks good, but unfortunately the Hudson build slave seems to be in bad shape (disk full). I'm working on getting that fixed. Would it be possible to run the tests locally in the meantime? Also, can you add a unit test? Should be easy to mkdir/chown a directory to reproduce the issue. > FileSystem.listStatus() throws NullPointerException instead of IOException upon access permission failure > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7327 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7327 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7327-1.patch > > > Many processes that call listStatus() expect to handle IOException, but instead are getting runtime error NullPointerException, if the directory being scanned is visible but no-access to the running user id. For example, if directory foo is drwxr-xr-x, and subdirectory foo/bar is drwx------, then trying to do listStatus(Path(foo/bar)) will cause a NullPointerException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:41:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A529E6418 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85760 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85736 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85728 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:41:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:41:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888F4DCD28 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1772490679.40041.1306262447556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Harsh J Chouraria updated HADOOP-7328: -------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) I thought of the throws XYZException way, but that'd require an incompatible change wouldn't it? I think it should be possible to detect the issue at sub-time, but I'll have to try that with some tests. Let me get back to you with something in that direction. > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A408687A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97516 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97436 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97428 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768A3DCF27 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1385664767.40049.1306262687482.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7323b.patch Thanks Tom. I've updated the Javadocs. I've also improved the alias resolution to resolve to the short class name, both with 'codec' ending and without 'codec' ending. This means that the aliases for GzipCodec are 'gzip' and 'gzipcodec' (both case insensitive) > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3DE96893 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97726 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97667 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97659 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD15CDCF29 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1200649117.40051.1306262687548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7323: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD86E6B8C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5679 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5652 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5643 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8496DC157 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <670535761.40066.1306263047751.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <860231771.38800.1306232087463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7328) Give more information about a missing Serializer class MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038714#comment-13038714 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7328: ------------------------------------- I don't think it's an incompatible change to replace what's currently a NullPointerException with something more descriptive. If the method signature can't throw an IOException, at least a RuntimeException with a nice error message would be an improvement. (To be clear, I'm not talking about changing the serialization factory, but rather the point in MR where the NPE gets thrown because of the null serializer) > Give more information about a missing Serializer class > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7328 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Harsh J Chouraria > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Labels: io, serialization > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7328.r1.diff > > > When you have a key/value class that's non Writable and you forget to attach io.serializers for the same, an NPE is thrown by the tasks with no information on why or what's missing and what led to it. I think a better exception can be thrown by SerializationFactory instead of an NPE when a class is not found accepted by any of the loaded ones. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:51:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 257F06BF2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7056 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7002 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6970 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:51:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D165DC153 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1423962105.40062.1306263047574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7258. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] I just committed this. > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: fix.patch, gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:53:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6FFE6D31 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12581 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12550 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12542 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:53:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:53:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A01DC262 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1112509341.40079.1306263167539.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 18:59:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11F556EAF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18535 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:59:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18509 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 18:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18501 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 18:59:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:59:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:59:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CCFDC4FF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1115941752.40121.1306263528880.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038720#comment-13038720 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- We currently publish jdiff documentation as a part of a release (e.g. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.2/jdiff/changes.html). There's also HADOOP-7035 which refines this to publish changes categorized by API stability and compatibility (there is an example at http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-7035/common/). HADOOP-7035 will include documenting the process for generating jdiff for a release, so I don't think that we need to get it integrated in Maven as a part of this issue. (If needed at a later point we could hook it into Maven by calling out to the script.) Does that sound reasonable? > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:03:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C61EA60C7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24755 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24729 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24721 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694BADC694 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <290878101.40132.1306263767427.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038724#comment-13038724 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480300/HADOOP-7323b.patch against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/517//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/517//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/517//console This message is automatically generated. > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1638B64D6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26707 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26674 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26666 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B768DDC756 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1033307530.40140.1306263887748.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038725#comment-13038725 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7258: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #617 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/617/]) HADOOP-7258. The Gzip codec should not return null decompressors. (omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127215 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/DoNotPool.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/CodecPool.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodec.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/BuiltInGzipDecompressor.java > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: fix.patch, gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:14:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9CB168BC for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41850 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:14:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41747 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41732 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B03DCA67 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1555700467.40158.1306264427753.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6988) Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HADOOP-6988. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Looks like we won't be reaching consensus on this issue. Closing out as it has long ago gone stale. Thanks for the thoughtful comments, everyone. > Add support for reading multiple hadoop delegation token files > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6988 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6988 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Aaron T. Myers > Assignee: Aaron T. Myers > Attachments: hadoop-6988.0.txt, hadoop-6988.1.txt > > > It would be nice if there were a way to specify multiple delegation token files via the HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION environment variable and the "mapreduce.job.credentials.binary" configuration value. I suggest a colon-separated list of paths, each of which is read as a separate delegation token file. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 975D66E87 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47729 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47698 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47690 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BB2DCB37 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <39417520.40191.1306264547536.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7146.txt I took all of your suggestions, except I didn't add null checks - the variables in question are never reassigned to null, so there's no way they could be, as far as I can tell. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E4AB6EC3 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47984 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47947 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47939 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39C0DCB3F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <215879726.40198.1306264547798.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 100BE633C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70890 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70861 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70752 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765B7DCF3F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <753999512.40230.1306265087481.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038742#comment-13038742 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------- - Rather than making CHECKPOINT public, can you add a new method like Trash.isCheckpointFileName(String)? - It's still not clear why TestHDFSTrash was putting stuff in the local filesystem's .Trash folder. There are two things wrong there - 1) TestHDFSTrash is supposed to test HDFS, not local, and 2) it seems to try to set up the .Trash dir inside build/ so that different builds dont interact poorly. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 19:39:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9BE6D7A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85701 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85659 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 19:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85651 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 19:39:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:39:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:39:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F6DC3D5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <110476382.40255.1306265927998.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038747#comment-13038747 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7146: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480303/hadoop-7146.txt against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/518//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/518//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/518//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15373-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DC006BB6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63469 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63361 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63348 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:30:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:30:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:30:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9BDDC54F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <815266661.40361.1306268988310.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038763#comment-13038763 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- I don't think we should commit this until the jdiff is done. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:36:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F06D6195 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86891 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86851 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86843 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:36:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60675DC85B for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:35:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1081328090.40398.1306269348390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:36:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D59B61A7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87188 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:36:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87153 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:36:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87141 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:36:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:36:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CB7DC83B for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1778013909.40371.1306269347538.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038767#comment-13038767 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- The current patch doesn't apply. It is trying to modify maven/checkstyle.xml. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:38:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B5EF6209 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89492 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89445 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89435 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F48DC991 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1301372736.40415.1306269467861.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:38:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE0926222 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89848 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:38:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89808 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89796 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:38:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A045EDC98A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1222860111.40408.1306269467653.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash5.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 20:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0B8162D4 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93505 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93453 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 20:40:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93438 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 20:40:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:40:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:40:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC66DCA2F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <905267277.40422.1306269587769.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7322: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7322-1.patch > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:01:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA5CD681C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33476 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:01:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33413 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:01:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33405 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:01:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:01:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C304BDC23F for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1263165421.40455.1306270847795.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038779#comment-13038779 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480312/trash5.patch against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/519//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/519//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/519//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:21:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B8F86474 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70461 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70414 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70406 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F80DCB75 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1286444982.40527.1306272047590.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038796#comment-13038796 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7305: ------------------------------------- Explicitly including tools.jar breaks OS X because it uses a classes.jar instead of tools.jar. My understanding is that a JDK will implicitly load tools.jar/classes.jar, whereas a JRE will not. The patch is adding $JAVA_HOME/../lib/tools.jar to the classpath. The use of ".." leads me to believe the submitter set JAVA_HOME to a JRE, and is using this patch to "break out" and load a JDK library. If my understanding is correct, would someone please revert this patch? Otherwise, could the classpath modification use a conditional so as to not break OS X? > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:37:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9445664DF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7900 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:37:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7773 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8197ADC9DA for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <494721186.40603.1306273007527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038815#comment-13038815 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------ Hi Todd, bq. Rather than making CHECKPOINT public, can you add a new method like Trash.isCheckpointFileName(String)? I'd prefer not to create this new API, for the following reasons: * CHECKPOINT isn't public, it's protected, which is common practice in the Hadoop codebase for exposing internal stuff to unit tests. * It's a static final constant, so there's no harm in exposing it. * I only want to test the basename, not the whole path, so claiming "isCheckpointFileName" is larger scope than needed. * There's no other demand for a test for "isCheckpointBasename", as shown by the fact that it doesn't already exist. bq. It's still not clear why TestHDFSTrash was putting stuff in the local filesystem's .Trash folder. There are two things wrong there - 1) TestHDFSTrash is supposed to test HDFS, not local... Completely agree, so I've copied your comment into HDFS-1967, which deals with TestHDFSTrash. If you can help me understand what TestHDFSTrash thinks it's doing, and whether it accomplishes it, I'd appreciate it. (I think it's trying to do exactly equivalent tests on Local FileSystem with TestTrash and HDFS FileSystem with TestHDFSTrash, but it doesn't seem to be succeeding.) bq. ...and 2) it seems [it should] try to set up the .Trash dir inside build/ so that different builds dont interact poorly. Yah, this is a weird one. I'm told that Trash is a fairly old feature, and was deliberately set up so that on local filesystems it would use the local canonical Trash. Not what I would have chosen, but changing would require not just a change to the unit test, but a large change to the semantics of Trash. Please let me know if you can +1 this patch on the basis of these responses. Thanks. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:45:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC386D53 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30638 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30600 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30587 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6789DC1A3 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1306867000.40651.1306273487744.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6671: ---------------------------------- Attachment: mvn-layout2.sh This version uses svn mv to modify the working directory. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:47:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55E976BAE for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32820 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32783 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32750 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F402DC323 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <101675095.40678.1306273607583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038828#comment-13038828 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6671: --------------------------------------- You should modify the script to also delete the files and directories that are no longer needed using svn rm. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 21:53:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8729E6FDF for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39116 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39064 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39055 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 21:53:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985B7DC68C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:52:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1227102234.40753.1306273968620.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038834#comment-13038834 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480329/mvn-layout2.sh against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 11 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/520//console This message is automatically generated. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 22:03:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DFA562CD for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52205 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52167 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52156 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 22:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77442DCB77 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <678927083.40820.1306274567485.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <360710663.20918.1304489523226.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7259) contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038846#comment-13038846 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7259: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit #681 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Commit/681/]) > contrib modules should include build.properties from parent. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7259 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: contrib.patch > > > Current build.properties in the hadoop root directory is not included by the contrib modules. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 22:14:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 765C269E2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67594 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:14:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67568 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67560 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 22:14:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:14:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:14:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851CBDCF59 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1151992895.40839.1306275227541.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038851#comment-13038851 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------ Minor goof: the last LOG.warn() statement uses "+ e" but should use ", e" > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 22:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF1656EBA for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90876 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90847 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90839 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 22:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4E7DC66B for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <584726501.40914.1306276307575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038865#comment-13038865 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7146: ------------------------------------ bq. I didn't add null checks - the variables in question are never reassigned to null, so there's no way they could be, as far as I can tell. Quite right. To safeguard that, could you please make those two variables "final"? Minor: In Reader.doRunLoop(), the LOG.Info() could use ", e" instead of "+ StringUtils.stringifyException(e)" +1 if those small changes are okay with you. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 22:36:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B85468A4 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94584 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:36:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94553 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:36:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94544 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 22:36:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C0DDC832 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2135158207.40935.1306276547548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 22:36:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F83F68D2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94927 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:36:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94819 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 22:36:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94801 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 22:36:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:36:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E427DC834 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1152243679.40936.1306276547579.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash6.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 23:14:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A71E766E1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24044 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24034 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 23:14:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:14:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C970DC26A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:13:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <547658332.40988.1306278827572.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038878#comment-13038878 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7322: ------------------------------------ Hi Bharath, 1. suggest javadoc comment for FileUtil.listFiles() to read: + * A wrapper for {@link File#listFiles()}. This java.io API returns null + * when dir is not directory or for any I/O error. Instead of having to + * null check everywhere File#listFiles() is used, we will add this utility + * api to get around this problem, for the majority of cases where we prefer + * an IOException to be thrown. 2. Not sure about the change to RunJar.main(). Isn't jar extraction usually pretty forgiving? It is currently written to skip any directory it can't read. Can you please give an argument for why that's wrong? 3. In the last line of testlistFiles(), to assure that the referenced directory can't possibly exist, why not use the same name as the directory you just deleted in the previous line? Maybe after asserting: Assert.assertTrue("Failed to delete test dir", !newDir.exists()); > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 23:19:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 681F16850 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28490 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28466 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28458 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 23:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD50DC3A7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1890735514.40995.1306279127381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 24 23:33:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86FF16E3D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40394 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40350 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2011 23:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40341 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2011 23:33:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:33:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:33:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B12DC74C for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <483742036.41009.1306279967605.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038881#comment-13038881 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480338/trash6.patch against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/521//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/521//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/521//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 00:33:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEE0C6521 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4971 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 00:33:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4945 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 00:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4937 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 00:33:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:33:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83859DC435 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1932253256.41056.1306283567535.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7322: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7322-2.patch Thanks for the comments, Matt. Regarding 2: Yes, we can be forgiving on this case. I added this because of eliminating null check. Attaching a patch which addresses all these comments. > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 01:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 823AA6AA1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53812 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53784 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53776 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 01:23:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5914CDD21A for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 01:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <495082955.41159.1306286567361.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038908#comment-13038908 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7322: ------------------------------------ Thanks, Bharath. Unfortunately I have one more item. Looking more at testlistFiles(), there are many calls that could cause an IOException, but only the last one should be an allowed IOException. Therefore, I think we have to remove the "expected=IOException.class" from the @Test annotation, and instead use the idiom: {code} try { files = FileUtil.listFiles(newDir); fail("IOException expected on listFiles() for non-existent dir " + newDir.getString()); } catch (IOException ioe) { //expected } {code} > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 06:24:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C586C4239 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48744 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:24:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48527 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:24:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48511 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 06:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AE8DD169 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option ------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7329 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: XieXianshan Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a particular partition is specified, then the status of the root partitions will be shown." and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a particular partition is specified, then the status of the root partitions will be shown. -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 06:38:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 123D44994 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60532 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:38:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59975 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:38:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59896 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 06:38:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:38:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6194CDD5BB for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:37:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <183232839.41536.1306305467396.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7329 fix the help message for df -h option. > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 06:40:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC5549C1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61737 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:40:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61712 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 06:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61704 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 06:40:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:40:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:40:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A318DD684 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 06:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:39:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <903607703.41541.1306305587365.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Fix the help message for df -h option. > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 07:01:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3D464B2F for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83734 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:01:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83532 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83524 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 07:01:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:01:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87488DDE36 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1447018837.41611.1306306847550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038990#comment-13038990 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7329: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480372/HADOOP-7329 against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/522//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/522//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/522//console This message is automatically generated. > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 07:07:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 125774ADA for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91017 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:07:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90988 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90968 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 07:07:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:07:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C281DD017 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1133222311.41620.1306307207373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038992#comment-13038992 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7329: ------------------------------------------- Patch LGTM :) > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 07:35:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37124AC4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16790 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16545 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16528 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 07:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C00DD92E for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <103123414.41644.1306308887544.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7322: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7322-3.patch Not a problem. I have updated the testcase. > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 07:35:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE63D4AC5 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16789 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16547 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 07:35:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16536 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 07:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB69DD930 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1682192711.41646.1306308887630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7322: --------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 08:00:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDBAE4857 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60766 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60615 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60405 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 08:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:00:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A489DD35B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 07:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1751023592.41697.1306310387497.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039009#comment-13039009 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7322: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480373/HADOOP-7322-3.patch against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/523//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/523//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/523//console This message is automatically generated. > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 08:38:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 265564444 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23738 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23694 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23681 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 08:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC5FDD535 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <960913349.41918.1306312668114.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash7.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 08:38:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BED6444F for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23854 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23704 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23695 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 08:38:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9BDDD539 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <613865644.41922.1306312668253.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 08:38:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 515D14465 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24372 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24346 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 08:38:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24338 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 08:38:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:38:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAC3DD533 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:37:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1819459722.41916.1306312668060.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 10:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C18A94142 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37530 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 10:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37501 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 10:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37493 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 10:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E20ADD034 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2037941060.42061.1306318787447.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039059#comment-13039059 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480383/trash7.patch against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/524//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/524//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/524//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 11:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88F954FDA for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 11:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1441 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1412 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1401 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 11:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 11:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0EEDD5D6 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1756668841.42109.1306322147369.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <64692328.19459.1304449203116.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7258) Gzip codec should not return null decompressors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039074#comment-13039074 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7258: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #699 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/699/]) HADOOP-7258. The Gzip codec should not return null decompressors. (omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127215 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/DoNotPool.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/CodecPool.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/TestCodec.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/BuiltInGzipDecompressor.java > Gzip codec should not return null decompressors > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7258 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7258 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.20.203.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: fix.patch, gzip-decomp.patch > > > In HADOOP-6315, the gzip codec was changed to return a null codec with the intent to disallow pooling of the decompressors. Rather than break the interface, we can use an annotation to achieve the goal. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:22:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A9E546A7 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12577 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:22:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12353 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:22:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12218 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E939DE773 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <714147725.42596.1306340507646.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7146.txt New patch addressing Matt's latest comments. I did change the log messages, though they weren't new from this patch. I agree that it's better not to use stringify, though. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:32:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39F1D43E7 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27162 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:32:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27123 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:32:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27115 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:32:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:32:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5D0DEAD2 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:31:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1648411209.42627.1306341108047.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039189#comment-13039189 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7329: ------------------------------------- +1. I don't think we need tests for this - we don't currently have any tests on help output. I manually verified the output of "hadoop fs -help" with the patch and it looks great. Thanks. > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:34:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 005324DEC for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31504 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31416 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31311 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CED2DEBDB for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <946467755.42634.1306341227574.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks XieXianshan. > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:34:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2776F4E01 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31677 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31619 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31418 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:34:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB5BDEBE4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:33:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1486146470.42638.1306341227708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7329: ----------------------------------- Assignee: XieXianshan > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:42:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A994420E for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41044 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40795 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40768 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:42:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:42:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBDFDEE9D for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:41:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <104532185.42652.1306341707577.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039193#comment-13039193 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7146: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480424/hadoop-7146.txt against trunk revision 1127215. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/525//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/525//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/525//console This message is automatically generated. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F5A6491C for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50425 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50383 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50370 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF76DE28C for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1662908194.42684.1306342247909.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans reassigned HADOOP-7144: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans (was: Luke Lu) > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 16:57:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1771A4C80 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59983 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:57:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59946 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 16:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59938 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 16:57:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:57:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:57:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EDCDE4E9 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 16:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <108001323.42703.1306342607741.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039203#comment-13039203 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #618 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/618/]) HADOOP-7329. Improve help message for "df" to include "-h" flag. Contributed by Xie Xianshan. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127576 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsUsage.java > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 17:30:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F3B045E0 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15997 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15949 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15941 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93EEDE1FF for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <967450658.42792.1306344587885.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039224#comment-13039224 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7320: ------------------------------------- +1. Hudson doesn't know how to deal with the renamed file in the test-patch process, but I re-ran tests locally. > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 17:30:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A6484610 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16284 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16196 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16094 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 17:30:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159E4DE208 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 17:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <110907153.42798.1306344588085.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks, Daryn! > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 17:46:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFBA2490B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44403 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44375 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 17:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44367 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 17:46:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:46:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:46:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC2CDE7C3 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 17:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <900695874.42831.1306345547630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039232#comment-13039232 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #619 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/619/]) HADOOP-7320. Refactor the copy and move commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127591 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/PathData.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/cli/testConf.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CopyCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandWithDestination.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/MoveCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/PathExceptions.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Ls.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Copy.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFsShellReturnCode.java > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 18:02:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06F31464B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75152 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75112 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75104 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 18:02:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 18:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 18:02:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4ADDEEF2 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 18:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <123741536.42906.1306346509845.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039245#comment-13039245 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6255: --------------------------------------- The hadoop-setup-single-node script is creating the config files in the cwd instead of the config directory. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 19:26:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E00947DB for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97103 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 19:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97075 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 19:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97067 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 19:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:26:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E750DEFE4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1531712102.43070.1306351547383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed the patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 19:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02ECB4B68 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24112 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24001 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23993 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 19:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C79DE6A8 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <493331462.43094.1306352747589.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039302#comment-13039302 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #620 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/620/]) HADOOP-7284 Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs (Sanjay Radia) sradia : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127642 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 20:09:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A988744DC for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59406 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59368 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59360 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775F5DEE7C for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <840909694.43123.1306354127485.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039310#comment-13039310 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- Was the latest revision reviewed? There are lots of diffs between trash3.patch which I had +1ed and trash7.patch which was committed (eg the use of "/homes" as a default home directory, which is very Yahoo specific) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 20:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E45FC487D for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6490 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6462 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6454 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 20:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9079BDE98D for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <145488850.43184.1306356227588.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039321#comment-13039321 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- This patch seems to also have broken the HDFS build. I am going to temporarily revert it. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 20:46:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B74643C4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9431 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:46:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9401 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 20:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9376 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 20:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81426DEA7A for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1753848736.43192.1306356347526.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reopened HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 21:06:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D17A44904 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39753 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:06:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39715 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39707 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 21:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0236DE334 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1063645027.43235.1306357547652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039333#comment-13039333 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #621 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/621/]) Revert HADOOP-7284 (r1127642) since it broke the HDFS build. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127679 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 21:26:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7D394874 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69292 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:26:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69256 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:26:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69247 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 21:26:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38CDDEC46 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <942611595.43291.1306358747732.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 21:26:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DB844885 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69558 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:26:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69525 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69512 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 21:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:26:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711DDDEC3B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1356385802.43283.1306358747460.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Joseph Evans updated HADOOP-7144: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: jmx.json HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch This is version 1 of the patch. It includes javadocs, tests, and the servlet. The servlet is placed under /jmx and returns data in a JSON format. Example output is attached too. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 21:58:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA884499F for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96786 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:58:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96756 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 21:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96748 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 21:58:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:58:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:58:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C739DF655 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <111266951.43369.1306360667375.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Foley updated HADOOP-7322: ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Release Note: Use of this new utility method avoids null result from File.listFiles(), and consequent NPEs. Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1. Committed to trunk. Thanks, Bharath! > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:06:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECE53405A for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3342 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3303 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3292 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:06:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89842DF893 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <123147266.43383.1306361148560.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch hadoop-setup-single-node.sh utilize hadoop-setup-conf.sh to generate config= uration. haddop-setup-conf.sh is a utility for admin to generate config in= cwd, and admin can push out config files to remote nodes with admin's own = utilities like rsync or scp. However, the single-node setup was meant to s= etup automatically with minimal config. It is nicer to have config file ge= nerated to HADOOP_CONF_DIR without storing a copy in cwd when hadoop-setup-= single-node.sh invokes hadoop-setup-conf.sh. =20 The patch is revised to avoid writing to cwd, if automatic setup is choosen= . > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security= -3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20= -security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-br= anch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOO= P-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:10:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EE4A40DE for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6248 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6198 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6190 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:10:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:10:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF5FDF9D6 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7330 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: metrics Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 Reporter: Luke Lu Assignee: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.20.203.1 The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:12:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 851054179 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10755 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10636 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10628 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:12:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:12:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:12:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B4BDFAE6 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:11:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1058945627.43443.1306361508220.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039372#comment-13039372 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- +1, lgtm, let's see hudson/jenkins' +1. Thanks for the json output (looks like it's 203?) as well, I spotted a bug (HADOOP-7330) the metrics system JMX code that I thought I fixed but didn't go into 203. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E0A646B4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16203 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16175 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16165 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92024DFC19 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1219740832.43458.1306361747594.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039376#comment-13039376 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7322: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #622 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/622/]) HADOOP-7322. Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing, avoid NPEs on File.listFiles(). Contributed by Bharath Mundlapudi. mattf : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127697 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/RawLocalFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileUtil.java > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:18:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3CBF4068 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19263 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:18:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19087 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19079 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:18:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:18:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4251DFCA3 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1158450599.43469.1306361867668.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039380#comment-13039380 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- The JSON is from a task tracker on 20 security trunk, with the name of the box replaced with foo http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-security Revision: 1127672 It is targeted for 0.20.205 > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:20:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2CD348A4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22294 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22269 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22257 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:20:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:20:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF28DFD4A for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <905561758.43479.1306361987381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-7330: ---------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch This is only for the branch-0.20-security* branches. yahoo-merge and trunk do not have this bug. > The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch > > > The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:22:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAF2E4914 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28284 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28234 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28223 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1840DFE3B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1252934613.43491.1306362107658.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <654871262.37888.1306191347393.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7323) Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039384#comment-13039384 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7323: ----------------------------------- +1 > Add capability to resolve compression codec based on codec name > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7323 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7323.patch, HADOOP-7323b.patch > > > When setting up a compression codec in an MR job the full class name of the codec must be used. > To ease usability, compression codecs should be resolved by their codec name (ie 'gzip', 'deflate', 'zlib', 'bzip2') instead their full codec class name. > Besides easy of use for Hadoop users who would use the codec alias instead the full codec class name, it could simplify how HBase resolves loads the codecs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:24:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE6A1493F for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29585 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29557 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29549 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E03CDFE99 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1395794000.43493.1306362227381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039385#comment-13039385 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- bq. The JSON is from a task tracker on 20 security trunk, with the name of the box replaced with foo Thanks for the precise answer. I meant whether the output is from 0.20.20x. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 22:49:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 104D74889 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65190 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65129 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 22:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65012 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 22:49:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:49:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD572DF6A8 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 22:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:48:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <886461764.43576.1306363728706.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-9.patch Enhancement to hadoop-setup-single-node.sh: - Delete datanode directory, if namenode format is chosen to avoid incompat= ible version of datanode directory left over. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security= -3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20= -security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-br= anch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOO= P-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-ma= pred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 23:39:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC3D241B1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12880 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12856 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12847 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 23:39:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016BDE3E5 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <494045772.43671.1306366727586.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039420#comment-13039420 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Sorry for breaking the HDFS build - will check this. Todd after you last review I merely fixed the bug when running the test on hudson -- the /homes is NOT a Yahoo thing but Linux default for Hudson machines. You had agreed that I should file a jira to specify how a home dir is specified for the different implementations of file system on various platforms. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 23:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7798B41CE for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13543 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13475 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13295 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 23:39:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EC7DE41C for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1465370992.43706.1306366728926.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch Reduce the safemode threshold-pct to 1.0f, and safemode.extension to 3 for = default template to improve initial setup user experience of using hadoop-s= etup-single-node.sh. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security= -3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20= -security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-br= anch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOO= P-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch, HADO= OP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255= -common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common= -trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-= 9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HA= DOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-m= apred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, dep= loyment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed May 25 23:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A587049C5 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26578 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26537 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26441 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757DDDE8FD for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <246694272.43748.1306367447477.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039431#comment-13039431 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- bq. the /homes is NOT a Yahoo thing but Linux default for Hudson machines. Only for the Hudson machines in *.yahoo.net ;-) I've never seen /homes/ anywhere else. Also, I thought this test was supposed to set up a LocalFileSystem subclass (TestLFS) that responded with a directory inside build/ as a home dir? > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 00:01:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84EC5461A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32117 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:01:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32081 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32072 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 00:01:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:01:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:01:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AADDEC40 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <885656412.43773.1306368059351.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039435#comment-13039435 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------------ BTW, since we're playing with 0.20.203 on our test box: JT UI runs as hadoop. NN UI appears to use dfs.web.ugi, as we're blowing errors in the NN log for the (unknown our systems) 'webuser' account. Are we *sure* this isn't already fixed in trunk? > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 00:07:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5259434A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36528 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:07:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36494 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:07:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36479 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 00:07:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:07:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F76DEE01 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1828440147.43779.1306368407496.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039437#comment-13039437 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------- If you're running without security on, it continues to use dfs.web.ugi (default webuser). If you turn security on, it will use the new static user plugin, which defaults to DrWho. Makes sense, right? > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 00:09:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBF4343B8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39368 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39334 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39325 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 00:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BC9DEEB1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <655348775.43797.1306368527540.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7326) TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039438#comment-13039438 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7326: ------------------------------------ In HADOOP-7284, Todd observes that TestTrash is "supposed to set up a LocalFileSystem subclass (TestLFS) that responded with a directory inside build/ as a home dir". Seems like that would be a good way to get around this silliness with shared .Trash directory. It looks like the current implementation is deficient. I'll look into fixing it. > TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() infinite loops if run on a home directory with stuff in .Trash > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7326 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7326 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Matt Foley > Assignee: Matt Foley > Attachments: hadoop-7326-TestTrash-1.patch > > > This bug was discovered while investigating HDFS-1967, intermittent failure of TestHDFSTrash, which calls TestTrash. If the user id running the test has a ~/.Trash directory that already has 4 or more files in it, a loop in TestTrash.testTrashEmptier() will never terminate, because it is waiting for the count of objects to increase from zero to exactly three (and it creates one object right away). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 00:11:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A6034454 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43530 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:11:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43497 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43489 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 00:11:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:11:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:11:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610B8DEF22 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <909012996.43802.1306368647394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039439#comment-13039439 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------ In HADOOP-7326, we've noted that the TestLFS implementation seems deficient - but a really good idea if it worked! > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 00:13:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CA9844E5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45341 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:13:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45279 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 00:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45032 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 00:13:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:13:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:13:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C539EDF03C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 00:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <982898781.43811.1306368767804.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <889607684.27597.1305830207722.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7307) Remove Dr Who references MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039440#comment-13039440 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-7307: ------------------------------------------ Ah ok. So we have a plug-in that basically ignores an (already existing) config setting that is practically custom built for this purpose. +1 to honor it in the plug-in. The JIRA title/description should probably flushed out to specify this is the actual problem. > Remove Dr Who references > ------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7307 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7307 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > I've had feedback from a number of different operators that the "dr who" references that occasionally come out of Hadoop are annoying and confusing. We should replace them with more descriptive error messages, usernames, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:01:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D24CF463B for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79785 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:01:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79753 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79745 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:01:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:01:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:01:35 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FE1DFC1F for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:00:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1635619820.43903.1306371655692.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039461#comment-13039461 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7146: ------------------------------------ +1. Looks great! Thanks, Todd. > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1897442E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93095 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93059 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93051 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B0CDFDB1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1158109903.43954.1306371887601.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039463#comment-13039463 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- > Also, I thought this test was supposed to set up a LocalFileSystem subclass (TestLFS) that responded with a directory inside build/ as a home dir? I don't recall saying that. The homedir needs to be set for ViewFs anyway - my patch sets it up via set of rules. A jira is needed to discuss what is the correct way to set home dir: server side or config for HDFS, config for viewfs or something more consistent. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:19:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C769046D5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2343 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2312 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2302 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:19:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A896DF0AD for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <859937697.44003.1306372727498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039466#comment-13039466 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- bq. I don't recall saying that. I understood this part of the patch to indicate that: {code} + static class TestLFS extends LocalFileSystem { + Path home; + TestLFS() throws IOException { + this(new Path(FileSystemTestHelper.TEST_ROOT_DIR)); + } + TestLFS(Path home) throws IOException { + super(); + this.home = home; + } + public Path getHomeDirectory() { + return home; + } + } {code} bq. The homedir needs to be set for ViewFs anyway - my patch sets it up via set of rules. right -- but the inclusion of /homes/ and not /home is very Yahoo-centric. The standard linux/bsd heirarchy puts home dirs in /home, not /homes. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:29:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD2EC4C3E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8546 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8521 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8513 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:29:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7314CDF328 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Matt Foley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <995648418.44024.1306373327468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039470#comment-13039470 ] Matt Foley commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------ My comment re TestLFS was of course directed at the version in TestTrash, not the new TestViewFsTrash proposed in the patch, which I haven't reviewed. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:41:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE3EC42AE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16848 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:41:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16789 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16489 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:41:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:41:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:41:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739F6DF57E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7331 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: scripts Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Tanping Wang Assignee: Tanping Wang Priority: Trivial Fix For: 0.23.0 Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:49:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7415649D4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20149 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:49:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20079 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20071 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:49:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:49:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C18DF767 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:48:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2053987489.44054.1306374528163.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039474#comment-13039474 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Todd, I originally copied LFS from the base test but then realized that there is more fundamental issue with homedir. One needs to be able to configure home dir based on whatever your local convention is. (HDFS-593 identified this issue a long time ago and a patch was available but Doug felt it wasn't high priority). Turns out if I had used LFS in this Jira, it would have masked the real problem. The design, implementation of trash and its tests has many issues. Also getting the test to work on Hudson is a valid use case (nothing to do with Yahoo). We both agreed that a jira is needed to address the homedir issue properly. If I remove /homes then it will not work on Hudson unless I mask it out with LFS. Please propose an alternate solution. I will also think of an alternate solution. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 01:53:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 844194C94 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25207 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25167 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 01:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25159 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 01:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688E4DF853 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1540010814.44057.1306374767425.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7331.patch > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 02:03:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83E7868CB for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32776 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:03:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32749 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:03:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32741 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 02:03:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F8DDFB49 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1286645112.44096.1306375367406.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7331.patch > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 02:03:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52D8C6912 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33048 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33009 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33001 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 02:03:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7E3DFB48 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <619393103.44095.1306375367379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-7331.patch) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 02:07:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51D1C6E44 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35675 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:07:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35551 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35492 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 02:07:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:07:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:07:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9B1DFC50 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:06:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <791472242.44117.1306375608052.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039479#comment-13039479 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7331: ------------------------------------- I think we need something a lot more involved to really do a useful job of this. The issue is that most of our daemons start and then exit a few seconds after startup (eg once the JVM has loaded and it has had a chance to do some basic initialization). For example, with an invalid config or bind address, hadoop-daemon.sh will still return 0 in this case. Regarding the patch itself: no need to use wc -l on the output of {{ps}}. Instead, something like: {code} if ! ps -p $! > /dev/null ; then exit 1 fi {code} since ps has a non-zero exit code if the process is running. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 02:13:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79AF26F30 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42995 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:13:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42957 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:13:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42948 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 02:13:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:13:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:13:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C1FDFF0A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1096736268.44158.1306375967814.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039482#comment-13039482 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7284: ------------------------------------- I agree it's nice to work on Hudson -- but I want to confine that to the test code. Unfortunately as is, it will work on the Apache Hudson but maybe not on other people's Hudsons or local boxes, right? Would the client-side conf be a lot of work? It seems like it would avoid all of this complication, simplify the tests, and let it pass on everyone's boxes? Maybe we could look at the $HOME environment variable to figure out the path? > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 02:41:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB6736ADF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59445 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59385 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 02:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59369 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 02:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B365DF623 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1847550073.44182.1306377647370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039489#comment-13039489 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- The reason I didn't do the config option is that the user will have to write code to determine what value to set based on the environment in which he runs. (I wrote the config option code but then realized that it was not the right solution and didn't want to make a new config parameter public and then be forced to pull it out later.) The $HOME may not work since the $HOME on my desktop is not the right one for HDFS to which I am submitting the job. My admin has set up a viewfs config that matches the hdfs cluster in which my job will run. The $HOME of the submitting machine is not relevant. This is a fairly subtle problem - I am not sure which solution is right otherwise I would have put it in. The solution in this patch is: the viewfilesystem impl has a set of heuristics that make it work for some common conventions: /user /Users, /home, /homes. It is an okay solution but clearner not general enough to work in all environments. In the short term it will work till we figure out a cleaner solution. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 05:16:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1E7F6BE3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46149 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46126 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:16:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46117 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 05:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E435DF472 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 05:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1718801008.44308.1306386947382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: HDFS-7331.2.patch Thanks for the comment! I agree that we need a more complex mechanism in order for hadoop-daemon.sh process to really know that daemons are not able to start due to various problems that may happen. Suppose now we want to restrict our problem set to deal with the issues like invalid config or unable to bind address in which cases the daemon should die rather quickly after starting. What about having a simple solution for now: we put the process to sleep for a few seconds before checking pid? (Made changes based the feedback.) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.patch, HDFS-7331.2.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 05:18:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A8A565BB for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49865 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49834 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49813 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 05:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9423DF542 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <923292489.44316.1306387067820.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7331.2.patch > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 05:18:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B405165D1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50119 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:18:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49836 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49812 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 05:18:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:18:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E5DF540 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 05:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <967663515.44314.1306387067713.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tanping Wang updated HADOOP-7331: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HDFS-7331.2.patch) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 05:24:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE3826D31 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56629 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56602 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56594 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 05:24:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:24:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9400DDF72F for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 05:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <954130393.44326.1306387427602.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1008788632.26385.1305807047638.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7305) Eclipse project files are incomplete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039513#comment-13039513 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7305: ------------------------------------- Hey Niels - can you chime in wrt Daryn's request? > Eclipse project files are incomplete > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7305 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7305 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Niels Basjes > Assignee: Niels Basjes > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7305-2011-05-19.patch > > > After a fresh checkout of hadoop-common I do 'ant compile eclipse'. > I open eclipse, set ANT_HOME and build the project. > At that point the following error appears: > {quote} > The type com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files ExcludePrivateAnnotationsJDiffDoclet.java /common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/tools line 1 Java Problem > {quote} > The solution is to add the "tools.jar" from the JDK to the buildpath/classpath. > This should be fixed in the build.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 05:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6C9860AF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63394 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63355 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 05:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63344 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 05:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A923DF8E2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 05:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 05:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1692434703.44338.1306387787498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039515#comment-13039515 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7331: ------------------------------------- Yep, I think sleeping is a good idea. Assuming this has been manually tested, +1 for this simple fix before doing something more complicated. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 07:52:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B103764D0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34177 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 07:52:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33885 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 07:52:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33854 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 07:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64966DF2BD for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 07:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <503549136.44645.1306396307408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7332) Deadlock in IPC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Deadlock in IPC --------------- Key: HADOOP-7332 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7332 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Saw this during a run of TestIPC on 0.22 branch: [junit] Java stack information for the threads listed above: [junit] =================================================== [junit] "IPC Client (47) connection to /0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:48853 from an unknown user": [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$ParallelResults.callComplete(Client.java:879) [junit] - waiting to lock <0x00000000f599ef88> (a org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$ParallelResults) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$ParallelCall.callComplete(Client.java:862) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Call.setException(Client.java:185) [junit] - locked <0x00000000f59e2818> (a org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$ParallelCall) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.cleanupCalls(Client.java:843) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.close(Client.java:832) [junit] - locked <0x00000000f59d8a90> (a org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:708) [junit] "Thread-242": [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.markClosed(Client.java:788) [junit] - waiting to lock <0x00000000f59d8a90> (a org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.sendParam(Client.java:742) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:1109) [junit] - locked <0x00000000f599ef88> (a org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$ParallelResults) [junit] at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC$ParallelCaller.run(TestIPC.java:135) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 07:56:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2A896691 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40494 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 07:56:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40468 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 07:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40447 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 07:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5A0DF534 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 07:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <645760220.44665.1306396547780.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to 22 and trunk. Thanks Matt and Aaron > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 09:11:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0466C6973 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30764 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 09:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30723 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 09:11:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30709 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 09:11:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:11:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:11:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC5EE052E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:10:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755015128.44828.1306401047630.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039600#comment-13039600 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7144: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480460/jmx.json against trunk revision 1127811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/526//console This message is automatically generated. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 09:23:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B08526FE3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47785 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 09:23:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47697 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 09:23:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47683 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 09:23:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:23:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:23:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4552AE08ED for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 09:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:22:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1397408236.44871.1306401769280.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 39605#comment-13039605 ]=20 Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment=20 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480476/HADOOP-6255-comm= on-trunk-10.patch against trunk revision 1127811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 27 new or modified tes= ts. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of java= c compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.= 3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number= of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compi= le. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5= 27//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Bu= ild/527//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build= /527//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security= -3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20= -security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-br= anch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOO= P-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch, HADO= OP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255= -common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common= -trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-= 9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HA= DOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-m= apred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, dep= loyment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 10:48:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CE586E06 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66552 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 10:48:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66511 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 10:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66503 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 10:48:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:48:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:48:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632BEE042D for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1603308083.45025.1306406867402.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039638#comment-13039638 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #57 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/57/]) HADOOP-7146. RPC server leaks file descriptors. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127815 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 10:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E181B606B for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78973 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 10:56:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78872 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 10:56:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78864 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 10:56:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:56:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D170E069A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <599082826.45047.1306407347639.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039640#comment-13039640 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #623 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/623/]) HADOOP-7146. RPC server leaks file descriptors. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127811 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 12:39:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D10863DD for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64362 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64323 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64315 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F06E0AAF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <934475441.45205.1306413528291.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1659614701.18791.1297804257612.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7146) RPC server leaks file descriptors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039680#comment-13039680 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7146: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #700 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/700/]) HADOOP-7146. RPC server leaks file descriptors. Contributed by Todd Lipcon. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127811 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/Server.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestIPC.java > RPC server leaks file descriptors > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7146 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7146 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: fd-leak.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt, hadoop-7146.txt > > > Both the Listener and Responder thread call Selector.open but don't have a matching .close(). This causes a leak of anonymous pipes. Not a big deal because people rarely close and re-open servers, but worth fixing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 12:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E564F63EF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64601 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64564 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64556 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 12:39:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A398FE0ABC for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2119035056.45216.1306413528667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1828723839.36128.1306162247409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7320) Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039681#comment-13039681 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7320: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #700 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/700/]) HADOOP-7320. Refactor the copy and move commands to conform to new FsCommand class. Contributed by Daryn Sharp. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127591 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsCommand.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/PathData.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/cli/testConf.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CopyCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/CommandWithDestination.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/MoveCommands.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/PathExceptions.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Ls.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Copy.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FsShell.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFsShellReturnCode.java > Refactor FsShell's copy & move commands > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7320 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7320-2.patch, HADOOP-7320-3.patch, HADOOP-7320-rename.patch, HADOOP-7320.patch > > > Need to refactor the move and copy commands to conform to the FsCommand class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 12:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B20E63F8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64859 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64817 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64809 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 12:39:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB82E0AC2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1642097636.45221.1306413528831.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039682#comment-13039682 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #700 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/700/]) Revert HADOOP-7284 (r1127642) since it broke the HDFS build. HADOOP-7284 Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs (Sanjay Radia) todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127679 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java sradia : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127642 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/Delete.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/ViewFileSystemTestSetup.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/Trash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFs.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestChRootedFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestViewFsTrash.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/viewfs/TestFSMainOperationsLocalFileSystem.java > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 12:39:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A43376425 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65657 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65609 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65600 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D9DE0ACC for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <155338093.45228.1306413529021.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1164170325.41524.1306304627421.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7329) incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039684#comment-13039684 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7329: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #700 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/700/]) HADOOP-7329. Improve help message for "df" to include "-h" flag. Contributed by Xie Xianshan. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127576 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/shell/FsUsage.java > incomplete help message is displayed for df -h option > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7329 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7329 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help df" is displayed like this: > "-df [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown." > and the information about df -h option is missed,despite the fact that df -h option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-df [-h] [ ...]: Shows the capacity, free and used space of the filesystem. > If the filesystem has multiple partitions, and no path to a > particular partition is specified, then the status of the root > partitions will be shown. > -h Formats the sizes of files in a human-readable fashion > rather than a number of bytes." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 12:39:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E35436430 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65784 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65741 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65686 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 12:39:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED768E0AC9 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <199230293.45226.1306413528969.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1067116917.37592.1306187867429.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7322) Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039683#comment-13039683 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7322: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #700 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/700/]) HADOOP-7322. Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing, avoid NPEs on File.listFiles(). Contributed by Bharath Mundlapudi. mattf : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1127697 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/RawLocalFileSystem.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileUtil.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileUtil.java > Adding a util method in FileUtil for directory listing > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7322-1.patch, HADOOP-7322-2.patch, HADOOP-7322-3.patch > > > While testing Disk Fail Inplace, we encountered lots of NPE from Dir.listFiles API. This API can return null when Dir is not directory or disk is bad. I am proposing to have a File Util which can be used consistently across to deal with disk issues. This util api will do the following: > 1. When error happens it will throw IOException > 2. Else it will return empty list or list of files. > Signature: > File[] FileUtil.listFiles(File dir) throws IOException {} > This way we no need to write wrapper code every where. Also, API is consistent with the signature. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 14:49:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6A776615 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87445 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 14:49:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87413 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 14:49:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87405 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 14:49:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:49:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF09E0D9B for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <568525803.45431.1306421327373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039724#comment-13039724 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- Ahh, Really Jenkins tried to use the JSON as a patch? Oh well the following are the manual results for trunk [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. [exec] > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 15:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B762654F for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20043 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 15:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20005 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 15:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19991 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 15:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A968E04C3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Caspole (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7333 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Environment: Linux x64 Reporter: Eric Caspole Priority: Minor I would like to propose a small patch to org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc 41d xorl R10, RDX # int The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 15:07:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E92656619 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22622 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 15:07:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22589 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 15:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22581 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 15:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B110FE0608 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 15:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Caspole (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <542285436.45490.1306422407721.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Caspole updated HADOOP-7333: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7333.patch > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 16:22:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFFF26F84 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56867 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56839 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56831 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 16:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20DBE03FE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1457725625.45652.1306426907791.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039758#comment-13039758 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- Hey Luke, what will it take to get HADOOP-7330 into 0.20.20X? I looked at the patch and it looks straight forward? It would be nice to have the JSON output consistent between releases. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 16:48:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B40E6363 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84487 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:48:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84460 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84452 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 16:48:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:48:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:48:35 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC45BE0F10 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:47:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1425457432.45758.1306428475833.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039773#comment-13039773 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------- bq. what will it take to get HADOOP-7330 into 0.20.20X? +1 on the jira and we'll nag one of the committers to push the changes to these branches :) > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 16:52:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 129E864D4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90408 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90372 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90364 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 16:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C2CE00A2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <500265503.45787.1306428707679.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039777#comment-13039777 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7330: --------------------------------------------- Comment +1 on the patch. It looks good, some tests would be nice, but it is a single line change that really doesn't impact much. Plus it makes 0.20.20X consistent with trunk. > The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch > > > The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 16:58:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E70A466B1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4465 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:58:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4433 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4421 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 16:58:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E07E02AF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <234427785.45794.1306429067676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch Replace setup script sudo command with su for external management software = to invoke the script without tty. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.2= 0-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-b= ranch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADO= OP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.pa= tch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, H= ADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6= 255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-com= mon-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-tru= nk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch,= HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, = deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 16:58:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55AB066CF for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4915 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:58:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4856 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 16:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4789 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 16:58:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EBEE02DB for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1679270735.45829.1306429069000.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch Replace setup script sudo command with su for external management software = to invoke the script without tty, same patch for 0.20 security branch. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.2= 0-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-b= ranch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADO= OP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.pa= tch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, H= ADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6= 255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-com= mon-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-tru= nk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch,= HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, = deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:00:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 158386A54 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8370 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8326 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8318 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE849E0442 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2107855344.45871.1306429187842.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Hey Eric. Nice work! I'm hitting the "submit patch" button so that the QA bot will run on this. I'll also try to get a chance to reproduce your performance test results. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:00:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60EDE6A6C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8597 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8571 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8402 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:00:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CC0E0444 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2027813462.45873.1306429187917.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7333: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Eric Caspole > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:04:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 631946F60 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20831 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20783 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20770 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:04:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B911BE0605 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2141829326.45892.1306429427755.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039785#comment-13039785 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-7330: --------------------------------- bq. some tests would be nice. Agreed. It'd be awesome if you can take up HADOOP-7273, which would help us write tests for JMX stuff outside HDFS. > The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch > > > The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:04:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFE9E6F8A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21093 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21058 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21050 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:04:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273EDE0659 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:03:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1820128409.45924.1306429429157.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 39786#comment-13039786 ]=20 Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment=20 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480556/HADOOP-6255-bran= ch-0.20-security-12.patch against trunk revision 1127811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test= s. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build= /529//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.2= 0-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-b= ranch-0.20-security-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADO= OP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.pa= tch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, H= ADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6= 255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-com= mon-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-tru= nk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch,= HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, = deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:22:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01BE767A4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51381 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51355 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51347 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B8AE0FA4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1983759717.45975.1306430507614.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039798#comment-13039798 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7333: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480549/HADOOP-7333.patch against trunk revision 1127811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/528//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/528//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/528//console This message is automatically generated. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:24:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09C15689A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58250 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58216 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58195 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:24:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:24:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:24:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927C9E00B5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:23:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1551128637.45989.1306430627596.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039801#comment-13039801 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------------- This was manually tested. Three test cases were covered: # make binding address troublesome -- by changing the config file to bind two name node service address to the same. After starting name node, hadoop-daemon returned 1. And error message were logged in log files. # make config file invalid - by renaming hdfs-site.xml to something else. After starting name node, hadoop-daemon returned 1. And error message were logged in log, i.e. "NameNode: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid URI for NameNode address.." # make some user errors - by not providing the correct options to hadoop-daemon.sh e.g. hadoop-daemon.sh --conf... --script hdfs made hdfs script does not exist. hadoop-dameon.sh returned 1 and error was output through std out. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:28:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C89C6904 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60838 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:28:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60798 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60789 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:28:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B67E02EB for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <628088806.46017.1306430867786.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039807#comment-13039807 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------------ Eric, good observation! I just have tried your patch and got the following results. Could you also post your results? You may simply copy and paste the text output on the JIRA. - With patch: java.version = 1.6.0_10 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_10-b33 java.vm.version = 11.0-b15 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 7.673 | 105.282 | | 2 | 14.646 | 131.429 | | 4 | 28.523 | 115.807 | | 8 | 51.734 | 281.044 | | 16 | 87.154 | 296.732 | | 32 | 131.368 | 338.979 | | 64 | 181.210 | 363.733 | | 128 | 219.660 | 376.653 | | 256 | 247.728 | 383.204 | | 512 | 263.704 | 387.144 | | 1024 | 271.574 | 387.665 | | 2048 | 276.787 | 389.429 | | 4096 | 279.420 | 390.218 | | 8192 | 280.808 | 390.630 | | 16384 | 280.895 | 388.867 | | 32768 | 280.641 | 386.111 | | 65536 | 280.908 | 386.008 | | 131072 | 281.049 | 386.089 | | 262144 | 281.117 | 386.124 | | 524288 | 281.133 | 386.130 | | 1048576 | 281.193 | 386.013 | | 2097152 | 281.208 | 385.508 | | 4194304 | 280.439 | 384.409 | | 8388608 | 279.023 | 382.025 | | 16777216 | 278.610 | 381.445 | - Without patch: java.version = 1.6.0_10 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_10-b33 java.vm.version = 11.0-b15 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 7.812 | 78.613 | | 2 | 15.149 | 135.446 | | 4 | 28.214 | 144.649 | | 8 | 50.598 | 292.826 | | 16 | 87.112 | 294.373 | | 32 | 132.665 | 354.003 | | 64 | 179.303 | 387.926 | | 128 | 218.238 | 408.221 | | 256 | 246.192 | 418.157 | | 512 | 262.853 | 424.399 | | 1024 | 271.822 | 425.695 | | 2048 | 276.041 | 428.904 | | 4096 | 279.137 | 428.804 | | 8192 | 280.552 | 429.013 | | 16384 | 280.489 | 429.608 | | 32768 | 280.647 | 426.743 | | 65536 | 281.974 | 427.366 | | 131072 | 282.104 | 427.439 | | 262144 | 282.079 | 427.408 | | 524288 | 282.252 | 427.355 | | 1048576 | 282.310 | 427.171 | | 2097152 | 282.136 | 426.867 | | 4194304 | 280.107 | 425.458 | | 8388608 | 280.020 | 422.325 | | 16777216 | 279.599 | 421.762 | > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:28:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20B46690F for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61217 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61185 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61177 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3287E02E8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <533611289.46015.1306430867730.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039806#comment-13039806 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- I was able to reproduce a similar performance gain on one of our test boxes (Xeon E5540 @ 2.53ghz) Without patch: || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 15.644 | 167.530 | | 2 | 28.458 | 167.751 | | 4 | 56.510 | 269.064 | | 8 | 94.573 | 440.632 | | 16 | 144.602 | 458.159 | | 32 | 197.831 | 557.829 | | 64 | 246.404 | 618.492 | | 128 | 275.926 | 630.191 | | 256 | 294.701 | 646.540 | | 512 | 306.519 | 660.747 | | 1024 | 308.296 | 666.046 | | 2048 | 315.532 | 675.444 | | 4096 | 314.267 | 666.920 | | 8192 | 314.343 | 669.222 | | 16384 | 314.655 | 674.295 | | 32768 | 314.940 | 665.232 | | 65536 | 314.991 | 670.965 | | 131072 | 314.950 | 678.721 | | 262144 | 318.098 | 665.080 | | 524288 | 317.110 | 661.923 | | 1048576 | 315.832 | 672.078 | | 2097152 | 313.902 | 669.421 | | 4194304 | 315.350 | 670.617 | | 8388608 | 316.019 | 673.716 | | 16777216 | 316.324 | 657.439 | With patch: || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 15.801 | 150.324 | | 2 | 29.117 | 159.762 | | 4 | 60.321 | 261.519 | | 8 | 100.779 | 423.568 | | 16 | 153.917 | 458.597 | | 32 | 208.510 | 564.227 | | 64 | 249.382 | 644.973 | | 128 | 281.078 | 714.154 | | 256 | 298.333 | 737.455 | | 512 | 308.425 | 750.980 | | 1024 | 313.149 | 759.572 | | 2048 | 315.489 | 764.234 | | 4096 | 316.663 | 767.175 | | 8192 | 317.716 | 768.538 | | 16384 | 315.930 | 758.694 | | 32768 | 317.824 | 763.277 | | 65536 | 317.246 | 764.298 | | 131072 | 317.927 | 765.582 | | 262144 | 317.217 | 750.438 | | 524288 | 318.005 | 759.085 | | 1048576 | 318.100 | 763.027 | | 2097152 | 318.050 | 762.100 | | 4194304 | 317.742 | 757.370 | | 8388608 | 316.887 | 753.327 | | 16777216 | 315.039 | 750.667 | Our most common use of CRC32 in DFS is with 512 byte chunk size, where we see about a 20% speedup in this test run. For big chunks, looks like about 15% - this is closer to the MR spill checksumming case. So, +1 pending Hudson results. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:31:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46066FF8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63405 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:31:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63376 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63368 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:31:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:31:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4808BE03F4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1087602784.46035.1306431048291.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039809#comment-13039809 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- Looks like Nicholas and I were doing the same thing :) For the record, here's my JVM info: java.version = 1.6.0_20 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_20-b02 java.vm.version = 16.3-b01 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 Nicholas - you good for us to commit this? > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:39:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1A136070 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79778 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:39:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79731 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79723 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:39:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:39:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:39:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E5E0733 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:38:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <918107472.46052.1306431527527.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:43:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E861C60FA for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84087 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:43:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84056 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:43:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84047 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0D5E08F1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <149715124.46067.1306431767443.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039815#comment-13039815 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Hi Nicholas. Have you had a chance to run the test case that Tom suggested? > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 17:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A693A64B7 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86265 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86203 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86191 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 17:45:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:45:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD51E0AFA for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1002966774.46087.1306431888307.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1. Committed to trunk and 22. Thanks, Harsh! > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:00:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43A2C6C75 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14317 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:00:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14243 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:00:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14235 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:00:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:00:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:00:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8D7E117C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <266455737.46150.1306432787776.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039833#comment-13039833 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7331: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480505/HADOOP-7331.2.patch against trunk revision 1127811. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/530//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/530//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/530//console This message is automatically generated. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:06:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1CCE6FE2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28179 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28144 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28136 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:06:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FE5E13D5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:05:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1350430221.46167.1306433149606.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039838#comment-13039838 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #624 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/624/]) HADOOP-7312. Update value of hadoop.common.configuration.version. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128003 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:06:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC166FEE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28410 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:06:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28384 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28376 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:06:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:06:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB28E13DE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:05:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1217518578.46176.1306433149974.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039840#comment-13039840 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------- - looks like there are some hard tabs, please configure your editor to use spaces per our coding guidelines - in the newly added LOG.debug line, please include some text. eg LOG.debug("Ignoring error closing socket", ignored); - in the test case, please add a fail("Didn't throw") line after the IOUtils.copyBytes call. That will make sure that the exception is properly propagated and not swallowed. - Probably better to separate the test in two -- one for the case where the inputstream throws, and another for the case when the output stream throws. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:10:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B14146113 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34928 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:10:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34903 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34895 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:10:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B114E156B for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <366381527.46198.1306433387500.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7256: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed, Incompatible change]) - How is this an incompatible change? - Please don't click the "reviewed" checkbox until a committer has reviewed. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:10:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55E2E6121 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35219 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35166 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:10:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35150 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:10:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962AEE156E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1621657814.46201.1306433387611.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7256: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6484C6099 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71177 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:44:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71147 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71131 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:44:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:44:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58460E1FE9 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org test-patch should check for hard tabs ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build, test Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 18:46:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F0C46B22 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74050 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:46:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74024 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 18:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74016 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 18:46:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:46:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:46:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9DCE00B2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <674363634.46298.1306435547961.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7334: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7334.txt I tested this on a patch that had some tabs, and it correctly identified them. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 19:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAC236E5F for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8784 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8737 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8729 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 19:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60C7E08E5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1686696685.46345.1306436687674.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039863#comment-13039863 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7334: ------------------------------------- +1. Looks like it only checks for tabs on + lines. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 19:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65CA16A35 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36609 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 19:25:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36566 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 19:25:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36558 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 19:25:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:25:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CC8E114C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 19:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 19:24:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <529623865.46415.1306437888064.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039873#comment-13039873 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------------- Given that this Jira is stuck I will change it to use a config value in the viewfs config. I am not sure if this is the right solution and in the short term i preferred my original solution till we figure out the right one. But there are more important things HDFS needs so I rather compromise than debate. I am testing the updated patch and will post it shortly. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 20:06:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E94C6147 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4036 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:06:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3999 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3991 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 20:06:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:06:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:06:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A49E1DC5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Caspole (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1601120505.46530.1306440347392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039890#comment-13039890 ] Eric Caspole commented on HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------------- Here is an example of what I got: baseline: java.version = 1.6.0_25 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_25-b06 java.vm.version = 20.0-b11 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.35-22-generic Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 11.312 | 83.741 | | 2 | 21.210 | 160.665 | | 4 | 42.377 | 195.647 | | 8 | 75.407 | 264.901 | | 16 | 124.451 | 291.424 | | 32 | 183.565 | 376.901 | | 64 | 245.988 | 424.204 | | 128 | 281.473 | 436.240 | | 256 | 317.394 | 458.765 | | 512 | 335.792 | 479.419 | | 1024 | 347.709 | 473.562 | | 2048 | 351.318 | 476.762 | | 4096 | 351.745 | 485.425 | | 8192 | 357.670 | 479.614 | | 16384 | 355.637 | 481.792 | | 32768 | 357.449 | 483.500 | | 65536 | 358.486 | 472.664 | | 131072 | 355.985 | 483.490 | | 262144 | 361.117 | 483.599 | | 524288 | 357.867 | 468.159 | | 1048576 | 355.371 | 476.476 | | 2097152 | 355.238 | 476.458 | | 4194304 | 354.549 | 471.960 | | 8388608 | 349.739 | 465.464 | | 16777216 | 347.075 | 461.695 | with patch: java.version = 1.6.0_25 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_25-b06 java.vm.version = 20.0-b11 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.35-22-generic Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || | 1 | 11.388 | 70.238 | | 2 | 21.377 | 140.269 | | 4 | 42.950 | 195.840 | | 8 | 76.818 | 316.527 | | 16 | 126.218 | 336.181 | | 32 | 187.139 | 407.078 | | 64 | 246.038 | 450.022 | | 128 | 283.940 | 463.666 | | 256 | 315.997 | 484.709 | | 512 | 337.407 | 492.866 | | 1024 | 346.651 | 497.357 | | 2048 | 349.376 | 507.337 | | 4096 | 356.193 | 497.322 | | 8192 | 356.303 | 506.458 | | 16384 | 353.121 | 503.858 | | 32768 | 351.595 | 503.809 | | 65536 | 358.412 | 500.009 | | 131072 | 356.675 | 503.672 | | 262144 | 356.723 | 501.896 | | 524288 | 357.432 | 497.297 | | 1048576 | 349.544 | 500.216 | | 2097152 | 350.197 | 500.098 | | 4194304 | 350.040 | 497.357 | | 8388608 | 348.890 | 477.051 | | 16777216 | 344.792 | 484.409 | > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 20:10:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20E4B6389 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16486 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16416 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16346 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4FEE1FCE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:09:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1795806506.46579.1306440590382.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039892#comment-13039892 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7334: ----------------------------------------- Todd, I wondering if we should remove the '-c' on the first grep. I'm in favor of coding style checking. Do you think we have a need to do something like checkstyle in the future? > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 20:10:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C74C63A3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16786 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:10:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16717 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16530 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 20:10:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF7DE1FD3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:09:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jonathan Eagles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1722215629.46584.1306440590570.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039894#comment-13039894 ] Jonathan Eagles commented on HADOOP-7334: ----------------------------------------- Other than what I said above, I think this patch looks great. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 20:23:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9F396B10 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34018 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33958 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33826 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 20:23:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB6EE150E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1276197862.46631.1306441367446.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039904#comment-13039904 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------------- No unit tests included since this is scripts. Manually tested. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 20:29:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 597DB6BE4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41205 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41164 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40935 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 20:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C608E16A4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <625681177.46645.1306441727571.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039905#comment-13039905 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------------ > Looks like Nicholas and I were doing the same thing :) ... Todd, this reminds me the fun when we were doing HADOOP-6166 and HADOOP-6148. Eric, thanks for joining us. > So, +1 pending Hudson results. +1 patch looks good. Let me run some more tests before committing this. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 21:44:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 012D4637B for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47520 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47471 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47463 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 21:44:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:44:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA31CE12B2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <939431288.46789.1306446227694.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039950#comment-13039950 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-22-branch #58 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-22-branch/58/]) HADOOP-7312. Update value of hadoop.common.configuration.version. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128004 Files : * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/src/java/core-default.xml * /hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.22/CHANGES.txt > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 21:52:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0E8E68F0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55178 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55137 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55129 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 21:52:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:52:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_FRT_LITTLE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0341E14DD for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <31886023.46803.1306446707915.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039952#comment-13039952 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------------ Tried 6 cases: three different machines, two JVMs (the latest 1.6.0_25-b06 and an earlier version) for each machine. The patch always improves the performance on the latest JVM (1.6.0_25-b06) but degrades the performance on some earlier JVMs. In the table below, *CRC32* is {{java.util.zip.CRC32}}, *PureJavaCrc32* is the current code in trunk and *H7333* is the current code with the patch . ----- h3. 1.1) Linux 2.6.9-55.ELsmp - Java 1.6.0_10 java.version = 1.6.0_10 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_10-b33 java.vm.version = 11.0-b15 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 7.842 | 72.924 | 82.086 | | 2 | 15.270 | 106.023 | 121.040 | | 4 | 27.828 | 103.828 | 119.558 | | 8 | 52.146 | 263.903 | 253.742 | | 16 | 85.452 | 283.530 | 280.151 | | 32 | 130.481 | 343.833 | 325.426 | | 64 | 177.955 | 380.677 | 354.599 | | 128 | 217.593 | 404.632 | 372.172 | | 256 | 243.913 | 416.707 | 379.768 | | 512 | 261.980 | 423.663 | 384.451 | | 1024 | 271.463 | 425.220 | 386.562 | | 2048 | 276.924 | 429.696 | 389.164 | | 4096 | 279.536 | 430.665 | 390.104 | | 8192 | 280.603 | 431.043 | 390.557 | | 16384 | 281.350 | 431.056 | 389.888 | | 32768 | 281.492 | 427.595 | 387.046 | | 65536 | 281.838 | 426.990 | 385.032 | | 131072 | 281.953 | 427.164 | 386.727 | | 262144 | 282.085 | 427.328 | 387.082 | | 524288 | 282.137 | 427.503 | 387.093 | | 1048576 | 282.076 | 427.465 | 387.000 | | 2097152 | 282.106 | 427.219 | 386.776 | | 4194304 | 281.215 | 425.642 | 385.575 | | 8388608 | 280.048 | 422.767 | 383.008 | | 16777216 | 279.671 | 422.120 | 382.612 | h3. 1.2) Linux 2.6.9-55.ELsmp - Java 1.6.0_25-b06 java.version = 1.6.0_25 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_25-b06 java.vm.version = 20.0-b11 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.9-55.ELsmp Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 7.408 | 105.707 | 91.593 | | 2 | 14.466 | 166.277 | 148.577 | | 4 | 27.889 | 195.146 | 202.841 | | 8 | 50.039 | 248.775 | 248.598 | | 16 | 84.972 | 329.594 | 335.569 | | 32 | 130.063 | 394.096 | 403.355 | | 64 | 178.457 | 436.276 | 448.967 | | 128 | 217.633 | 461.647 | 475.962 | | 256 | 245.799 | 474.164 | 490.574 | | 512 | 262.378 | 482.075 | 498.107 | | 1024 | 270.899 | 482.538 | 498.268 | | 2048 | 276.426 | 486.091 | 502.043 | | 4096 | 279.105 | 487.801 | 504.114 | | 8192 | 278.792 | 488.647 | 504.989 | | 16384 | 281.229 | 488.611 | 505.019 | | 32768 | 281.292 | 485.426 | 501.475 | | 65536 | 281.670 | 485.282 | 499.889 | | 131072 | 280.752 | 483.555 | 499.573 | | 262144 | 280.870 | 483.588 | 499.616 | | 524288 | 280.863 | 483.364 | 499.629 | | 1048576 | 280.913 | 483.524 | 499.278 | | 2097152 | 280.552 | 483.234 | 499.226 | | 4194304 | 280.172 | 481.426 | 497.313 | | 8388608 | 278.749 | 477.359 | 492.912 | | 16777216 | 278.458 | 476.276 | 492.101 | h3. 2.1) Linux 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 - Java 1.6.0_05-b13 java.version = 1.6.0_05 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_05-b13 java.vm.version = 10.0-b19 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = i386 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 9.705 | 111.072 | 111.346 | | 2 | 18.016 | 138.367 | 137.494 | | 4 | 34.638 | 213.342 | 226.139 | | 8 | 62.939 | 221.194 | 239.386 | | 16 | 107.019 | 289.123 | 307.963 | | 32 | 164.449 | 368.337 | 378.862 | | 64 | 224.498 | 425.263 | 423.380 | | 128 | 275.259 | 463.062 | 449.381 | | 256 | 309.731 | 485.426 | 465.417 | | 512 | 331.076 | 497.375 | 473.646 | | 1024 | 342.002 | 499.592 | 475.978 | | 2048 | 349.365 | 504.120 | 479.042 | | 4096 | 352.857 | 506.511 | 480.351 | | 8192 | 353.812 | 507.538 | 474.044 | | 16384 | 351.864 | 507.212 | 480.870 | | 32768 | 351.206 | 499.854 | 479.526 | | 65536 | 352.413 | 492.054 | 480.082 | | 131072 | 348.713 | 499.692 | 480.194 | | 262144 | 353.375 | 491.986 | 480.235 | | 524288 | 353.703 | 499.682 | 480.275 | | 1048576 | 353.387 | 499.606 | 480.259 | | 2097152 | 352.382 | 491.653 | 480.062 | | 4194304 | 352.810 | 499.002 | 479.758 | | 8388608 | 351.093 | 493.473 | 475.056 | | 16777216 | 350.968 | 492.484 | 473.960 | h3. 2.2) Linux 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 - Java 1.6.0_25-b06 java.version = 1.6.0_25 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_25-b06 java.vm.version = 20.0-b11 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = amd64 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 8.623 | 131.418 | 108.732 | | 2 | 17.125 | 195.779 | 179.235 | | 4 | 31.958 | 239.181 | 250.013 | | 8 | 56.425 | 296.820 | 306.358 | | 16 | 96.881 | 397.425 | 406.786 | | 32 | 154.939 | 475.686 | 499.760 | | 64 | 211.171 | 526.751 | 556.665 | | 128 | 267.582 | 559.062 | 591.984 | | 256 | 305.220 | 575.348 | 613.347 | | 512 | 326.476 | 583.960 | 623.138 | | 1024 | 338.115 | 585.560 | 624.430 | | 2048 | 345.509 | 589.541 | 628.801 | | 4096 | 349.223 | 591.533 | 630.996 | | 8192 | 351.142 | 592.521 | 632.064 | | 16384 | 352.057 | 592.771 | 628.888 | | 32768 | 351.449 | 588.814 | 627.688 | | 65536 | 352.759 | 588.454 | 627.405 | | 131072 | 352.914 | 588.611 | 627.559 | | 262144 | 352.735 | 588.665 | 627.592 | | 524288 | 353.095 | 588.660 | 627.592 | | 1048576 | 353.145 | 588.571 | 627.485 | | 2097152 | 353.140 | 588.262 | 627.276 | | 4194304 | 352.952 | 587.857 | 626.714 | | 8388608 | 350.475 | 581.068 | 618.994 | | 16777216 | 349.872 | 579.330 | 617.299 | h3. 3.1) Windows XP - Java 1.6.0_23-b05 java.version = 1.6.0_23 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_23-b05 java.vm.version = 19.0-b09 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = x86 os.name = Windows XP os.version = 5.1 Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 4.276 | 62.669 | 64.448 | | 2 | 7.978 | 102.239 | 109.401 | | 4 | 16.730 | 132.354 | 147.217 | | 8 | 31.439 | 182.390 | 195.586 | | 16 | 54.836 | 219.618 | 234.732 | | 32 | 87.627 | 238.995 | 270.211 | | 64 | 129.170 | 253.900 | 304.123 | | 128 | 170.240 | 278.521 | 321.418 | | 256 | 211.477 | 286.423 | 341.665 | | 512 | 265.165 | 304.382 | 279.309 | | 1024 | 282.990 | 249.336 | 350.560 | | 2048 | 243.438 | 307.147 | 353.229 | | 4096 | 294.114 | 309.688 | 281.155 | | 8192 | 301.212 | 280.119 | 334.366 | | 16384 | 243.790 | 290.962 | 344.765 | | 32768 | 292.988 | 295.948 | 272.812 | | 65536 | 290.493 | 282.761 | 348.932 | | 131072 | 250.337 | 301.592 | 352.376 | | 262144 | 302.263 | 307.579 | 285.689 | | 524288 | 304.144 | 306.469 | 331.565 | | 1048576 | 289.816 | 205.993 | 350.036 | | 2097152 | 295.914 | 289.658 | 285.215 | | 4194304 | 270.211 | 300.434 | 295.595 | | 8388608 | 236.343 | 276.725 | 339.176 | | 16777216 | 291.456 | 295.043 | 311.783 | h3. 3.2) Windows XP - Java 1.6.0_25-b06 java.version = 1.6.0_25 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_25-b06 java.vm.version = 20.0-b11 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = x86 os.name = Windows XP os.version = 5.1 Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 3.868 | 63.751 | 68.806 | | 2 | 7.819 | 98.380 | 115.517 | | 4 | 15.446 | 124.773 | 164.977 | | 8 | 29.635 | 174.449 | 237.747 | | 16 | 55.030 | 196.089 | 290.992 | | 32 | 94.131 | 244.999 | 325.735 | | 64 | 143.858 | 266.674 | 346.240 | | 128 | 192.723 | 330.168 | 281.406 | | 256 | 237.439 | 332.342 | 362.283 | | 512 | 216.150 | 333.393 | 364.037 | | 1024 | 273.192 | 337.913 | 282.942 | | 2048 | 293.097 | 336.928 | 368.440 | | 4096 | 300.675 | 260.551 | 368.051 | | 8192 | 304.412 | 338.468 | 368.042 | | 16384 | 232.549 | 338.616 | 367.385 | | 32768 | 305.303 | 334.487 | 286.756 | | 65536 | 306.435 | 331.820 | 356.131 | | 131072 | 274.592 | 292.947 | 363.439 | | 262144 | 304.008 | 336.345 | 285.965 | | 524288 | 306.601 | 328.582 | 367.409 | | 1048576 | 302.045 | 251.833 | 367.058 | | 2097152 | 296.679 | 333.299 | 362.986 | | 4194304 | 243.700 | 332.293 | 344.360 | | 8388608 | 302.936 | 332.315 | 303.883 | | 16777216 | 301.516 | 329.897 | 362.755 | > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 21:56:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9478A69BA for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62277 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:56:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62247 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 21:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62239 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 21:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:56:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C015E1682 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1117117735.46822.1306446947373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c7333_20110526.patch c7333_20110526.patch: the codes I used for testing. See if anyone wants to try it. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:09:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99F85605D for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74215 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:09:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74174 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74166 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:09:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:09:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63597E1A8C for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:08:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <743418768.46858.1306447728403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039960#comment-13039960 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------------ > Nicholas - you good for us to commit this? Let's wait til for a day. We should commit it unless something new is found. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F066629E for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87922 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87896 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87888 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:15:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918F2E1C21 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <883564157.46876.1306448087592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039964#comment-13039964 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7333: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480587/c7333_20110526.patch against trunk revision 1128003. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/531//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/531//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/531//console This message is automatically generated. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:29:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00125683D for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97702 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:29:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97668 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97660 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:29:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E66E1FC0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <726980622.46928.1306448928676.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6904) A baby step towards inter-version RPC communications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039967#comment-13039967 ] Luke Lu commented on HADOOP-6904: --------------------------------- bq. VersionedProtocol keeps the old API: getProtocolVersion for backwards compatibility purpose. The patch added a new method getProtocolSignature to the VersionedProtocol interface, which breaks (compile and runtime) all existing code that uses VersionedProtocol. Looking at the code added to mapreduce protocols, it seems that the default getProtocolSignature impl doesn't need the interface change i.e., the API breakage doesn't seem necessary in default cases. For people who want to map a protocol to a different impl than the default. An additional static ProtocolSignature.bind(String protocol, Type impl) method can be used to establish the mapping at class init time. > A baby step towards inter-version RPC communications > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6904 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6904 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: majorMinorVersion.patch, majorMinorVersion1.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk1.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk10.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk11.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk2.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk4.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk5.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk6.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk7.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk8.patch, rpcCompatible-trunk9.patch, rpcVersion.patch, rpcVersion1.patch > > > Currently RPC communications in Hadoop is very strict. If a client has a different version from that of the server, a VersionMismatched exception is thrown and the client can not connect to the server. This force us to update both client and server all at once if a RPC protocol is changed. But sometime different versions do not mean the client & server are not compatible. It would be nice if we could relax this restriction and allows us to support inter-version communications. > My idea is that DfsClient catches VersionMismatched exception when it connects to NameNode. It then checks if the client & the server is compatible. If yes, it sets the NameNode version in the dfs client and allows the client to continue talking to NameNode. Otherwise, rethrow the VersionMismatch exception. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:29:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E00EE685A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97984 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:29:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97945 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97937 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:29:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:29:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B0DE1FBE for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1884034450.46926.1306448928613.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-13.patch Minor bugfix in hadoop-setup-single-node.sh to work on correctly in Debian. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch,= HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP= -6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-c= ommon-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-t= runk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, H= ADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6= 255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patch, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:31:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33A8C6002 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3042 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:31:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3003 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:31:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2968 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:31:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:31:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:31:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDC6E1087 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:30:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Yang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1565923507.46982.1306449049516.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eric Yang updated HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch Minor bug fixes: * Removed hadoop-config.sh from /usr/sbin * export environment to su -c in hadoop-setup-single-node.sh and hadoop-cre= ate-user.sh * Removed *.debian and *.redhat from /usr/sbin * Renamed hadoop to hadoop-common, and hadoop-mapred to hadoop-mapreduce > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 131B462B2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12661 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12618 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12541 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8058E1464 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1482218930.47011.1306449887684.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 39976#comment-13039976 ]=20 Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6255: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment=20 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480593/HADOOP-6255-comm= on-trunk-12.patch against trunk revision 1128003. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 27 new or modified tes= ts. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of java= c compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.= 3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number= of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compi= le. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/5= 32//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Bu= ild/532//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build= /532//console This message is automatically generated. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.203.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 22:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E3436591 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20126 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20035 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 22:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20027 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 22:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D73EE1689 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2009754766.47057.1306450247379.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1937737372.43422.1306361387389.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7330) The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-7330. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks, Luke! > The metrics source mbean implementation should return the attribute value instead of the object > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7330 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7330 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.20.203.1 > > Attachments: hadoop-7330-jmx-v1.patch > > > The MetricsSourceAdapter#getAttribute in 0.20.203 is returning the attribute object instead of the value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu May 26 23:10:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82A8C6CA7 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39673 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 23:10:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39636 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2011 23:10:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39625 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2011 23:10:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:10:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:10:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34292E1AF5 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 23:09:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <489520204.47099.1306451388210.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13039986#comment-13039986 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- The Jenkins scripts in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/nightly/ will need updating too. To test the changes we could have a branch containing the Mavenized tree (i.e. with the patch from this issue applied), and a copy of the Jenkins nightly build job that uses a Maven version of the nightly script. For patch submission we can test the script manually rather than hooking it up to Jenkins across the board. We'd only commit this change when we are happy that the Jenkins jobs are working properly. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6671.patch, HADOOP-6671b.patch, HADOOP-6671c.patch, HADOOP-6671d.patch, build.png, hadoop-commons-maven.patch, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout.sh, mvn-layout2.sh, mvn-layout2.sh > > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:02:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579C64ADA for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55588 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55549 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55541 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE07DE11D6 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1410253917.47440.1306461707840.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7334: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7334.txt You're absolutely right about the first -c.. I was testing with a patch that had only one tab so I didn't notice :) Something like checkstyle probably makes sense at some point, but right now we have so many violations that it would be a big change. Spaces vs tabs is one thing everyone agrees on and where there's never any question of "aesthetics" :) So let's start here and maybe some day ease in some checkstyle. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:04:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F19B4409 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56015 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55987 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55978 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:04:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:04:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:04:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584B9E1240 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <288244867.47442.1306461827358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040028#comment-13040028 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- Nice work checking this out on prior JVMs. I wonder if you use -XX:+AggressiveOpts on the earlier JVM if it would have the same performance increases? > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:08:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DEB7446B for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58081 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:08:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58049 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:08:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58041 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:08:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:08:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:08:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF6FE139D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <770884625.47452.1306462067373.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040029#comment-13040029 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7334: ------------------------------------------------ Nice work! We should have this long time ago. BTW, do you want to also check 80 characters per line? But it is arguably if it is the rule we want to enforce. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03726498C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62533 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62497 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62488 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA7AE159F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2119411263.47466.1306462547576.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040032#comment-13040032 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------------------ > ... I wonder if you use -XX:+AggressiveOpts on the earlier JVM if it would have the same performance increases? By comparing the following with (2.1), it seems both columns have some better numbers but the patch still degrades the performance. ----- h3. 2.3) Linux 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 - Java 1.6.0_05-b13 with -XX:+AggressiveOpts $ java -XX:+AggressiveOpts -cp hadoop-common-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:hadoop-common-test-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT.jar org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32\$PerformanceTest java.version = 1.6.0_05 java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment java.runtime.version = 1.6.0_05-b13 java.vm.version = 10.0-b19 java.vm.vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. java.vm.name = Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM java.vm.specification.version = 1.0 java.specification.version = 1.6 os.arch = i386 os.name = Linux os.version = 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 Performance Table (The unit is MB/sec) || Num Bytes || CRC32 || PureJavaCrc32 || H7333 || | 1 | 9.699 | 111.729 | 108.432 | | 2 | 18.007 | 139.071 | 138.762 | | 4 | 35.060 | 217.921 | 223.770 | | 8 | 64.308 | 220.957 | 241.875 | | 16 | 108.495 | 290.035 | 308.596 | | 32 | 166.368 | 365.532 | 379.159 | | 64 | 226.203 | 424.410 | 423.369 | | 128 | 275.945 | 463.763 | 449.295 | | 256 | 311.077 | 485.665 | 465.597 | | 512 | 331.712 | 498.074 | 473.644 | | 1024 | 340.871 | 504.308 | 475.610 | | 2048 | 346.745 | 507.910 | 478.512 | | 4096 | 351.109 | 508.981 | 480.016 | | 8192 | 352.892 | 509.891 | 480.836 | | 16384 | 350.394 | 508.394 | 480.766 | | 32768 | 350.816 | 500.573 | 479.659 | | 65536 | 348.351 | 500.105 | 473.086 | | 131072 | 352.889 | 499.988 | 480.385 | | 262144 | 352.796 | 499.779 | 480.421 | | 524288 | 353.542 | 499.895 | 480.432 | | 1048576 | 353.364 | 499.754 | 480.367 | | 2097152 | 352.447 | 499.452 | 480.190 | | 4194304 | 352.423 | 499.187 | 479.956 | | 8388608 | 351.037 | 493.194 | 475.243 | | 16777216 | 350.760 | 492.260 | 474.271 | > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:16:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00F4A49BE for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62793 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:16:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62757 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62749 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:16:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:16:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B3CE159D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1193788051.47464.1306462547495.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040031#comment-13040031 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7334: ------------------------------------- IMO 80 chars per line is one of those things that should be kept in general, but if the occasional line flows over it's not a big deal. There's some times when it's much less readable to try to keep to it. But this is where we get into religious wars ;-) I'm a 100-per-line devotee myself! > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:20:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C27594AC1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65836 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:20:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65804 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65796 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:20:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:20:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83927E16A9 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1614742603.47477.1306462787535.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040034#comment-13040034 ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-7334: ------------------------------------------------ Provided that most monitors are wide-screen nowadays, the 80-per-line rule is probably out-dated. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 02:28:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47D64C1D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81589 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81560 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 02:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81552 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 02:28:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:28:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D15E188B for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <369440082.47490.1306463267536.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040036#comment-13040036 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- So, I guess the question is: are we OK with trading off a 5-10% performance hit on older JVMs for a 10-20% performance gain on newer ones? I think yes. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 03:45:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B531C42FE for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 03:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35271 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 03:45:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35054 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 03:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35034 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 03:45:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 03:45:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 03:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BC8E1ABB for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 03:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <85369923.47686.1306467887675.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040044#comment-13040044 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------------ Hi Todd, Thanks for the comments. When I had submitted this issue my IDE had the wrong formatter. Now I have changed them. I will fix all your comments and resubmit it and also will take care this formatting and check box problem doesnt come here then. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 04:27:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1106842CE for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 04:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59251 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 04:27:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59015 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 04:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58999 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 04:27:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 04:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 04:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F24E1461 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 04:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 04:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1834072493.47727.1306470407592.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040050#comment-13040050 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-7334: ----------------------------------- > Do you think we have a need to do something like checkstyle in the future? We have long had a checkstyle target in ant, and plots of checkstyle violations over time (see https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/), but unfortunately we haven't enforced the rule that the number may not increase (unlike javadoc or findbugs warnings for example). Another way of implementing this JIRA would be to enable such a rule (perhaps with a weaker set of checkstyle rules than the current set, e.g. drop the 80-per-line rule). > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 06:19:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B55B4A3F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40505 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:19:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40465 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40341 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 06:19:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:19:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:19:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E155E2210 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 06:18:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1144203721.47874.1306477127578.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash8.patch Updated patch. Uses videwfs's config to set homedir. Note I have retained the signature of trashShell()'s original signature and added an overloaded trashShell so that the tests in the hdfs project do not need to be changed. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 06:21:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7129B4C71 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42155 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41739 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:21:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41727 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 06:21:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:21:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5885FE2286 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 06:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <622191463.47879.1306477247359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 06:41:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBF634444 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55642 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:41:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55527 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:41:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55505 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 06:41:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:41:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:41:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6A6E285E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 06:40:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <673579404.47930.1306478447365.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040086#comment-13040086 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480629/trash8.patch against trunk revision 1128003. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/533//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/533//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/533//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 06:43:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 411BE44AC for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56632 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:43:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56585 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 06:43:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56562 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 06:43:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:43:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:43:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089D2E2992 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 06:42:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1076600742.47948.1306478568031.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1260350704.46296.1306435427358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7334) test-patch should check for hard tabs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040088#comment-13040088 ] Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-7334: ------------------------------------- Tom, that's a good idea. Enable checkstyle with just the tab check and then we can grow the checks over time. Start small and iterate. > test-patch should check for hard tabs > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7334 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, test > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-7334.txt, hadoop-7334.txt > > > Our coding guidelines say that hard tabs are disallowed in the Hadoop code, but they sometimes sneak in (there are about 280 in the common codebase at the moment). > We should run a simple check for this in the test-patch process so it's harder for them to sneak in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 08:02:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E80794B33 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53103 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52961 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51521 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 08:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6807E2169 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1053603540.48091.1306483308678.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash9.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 08:02:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDB364B49 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53107 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52984 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52950 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 08:02:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C41E2173 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1930010661.48100.1306483309036.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 08:02:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF2FA4B4D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53101 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52737 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:02:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51522 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 08:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DB3E216F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <716146991.48096.1306483308873.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 08:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AFF447C7 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76144 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:15:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75997 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75983 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 08:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AFCE26B2 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1788442843.48137.1306484087335.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040123#comment-13040123 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480632/trash9.patch against trunk revision 1128003. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.TestViewFsTrash +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/534//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/534//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/534//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 08:42:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E22B34721 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23499 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:42:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23415 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 08:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23263 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 08:42:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:42:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC7FE20C9 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 08:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 08:41:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1459910516.48207.1306485708040.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1738535981.26274.1305802127556.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7304) BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7304: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) > BackUpNameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any requests. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7304 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7304 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > > In our environment, Backup NameNode is using 100% CPU and not accepting any calls in 3days long run. > Thread dump > "IPC Server Responder" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f86c41c6800 nid=0x3b2a runnable [0x00007f86ce579000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:215) > at sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:65) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:69) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a20> (a sun.nio.ch.Util$1) > locked <0x00007f86d67e2a08> (a java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableSet) > locked <0x00007f86d67e26a8> (a sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl) > at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:80) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Responder.run(Server.java:501) > Looks like same issue occurred in jetty also. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937 > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 09:52:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08BF34BD8 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 09:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24143 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 09:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24114 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 09:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24106 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 09:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 09:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 09:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94567E2895 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 09:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1392842184.48304.1306489907603.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040157#comment-13040157 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7331: ---------------------------------------- I understand why there aren't any tests for this, but worry about the sleep 3; statement: why choose three seconds? It seems one of those only-works-on-some-machines sttings. > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 10:17:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFF1D4383 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62826 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 10:17:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62679 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 10:17:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62671 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 10:17:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:17:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D09E2154 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nicholas Telford (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1302656896.48352.1306491407597.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040165#comment-13040165 ] Nicholas Telford commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------------ Totally missed that. As requested, tested: {noformat} $ ant -Dtestcase=Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest test ... [junit] Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3native.Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest [junit] Tests run: 37, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 155.312 sec ... BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 3 minutes 2 seconds {noformat} I ran this before and after applying the patch, the results were the same. > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 10:50:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3600B41A9 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6664 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 10:50:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6636 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 10:50:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6627 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 10:50:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:50:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F140AE2D74 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 10:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:49:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1448025795.48412.1306493387985.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6941) Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040178#comment-13040178 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6941: ---------------------------------------- SteveW is now ex-IBM, so probably can't check this. If the patch doesnt break sun JVM, someone with the IBM JVM will have to test it -even if they can't build it on that JVM. > Support non-SUN JREs in UserGroupInformation > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6941 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6941 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: SLES 11, Apache Harmony 6 and SLES 11, IBM Java 6 > Reporter: Stephen Watt > Assignee: Stephen Watt > Fix For: 0.21.1, 0.22.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6941.patch, hadoop-6941.patch > > > Attempting to format the namenode or attempting to start Hadoop using Apache Harmony or the IBM Java JREs results in the following exception: > 10/09/07 16:35:05 ERROR namenode.NameNode: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.(UserGroupInformation.java:223) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) > at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.setConfigurationParameters(FSNamesystem.java:420) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.(FSNamesystem.java:391) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.format(NameNode.java:1240) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.createNameNode(NameNode.java:1348) > at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.NameNode.main(NameNode.java:1368) > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.security.auth.UnixPrincipal > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:421) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:652) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:346) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:618) > ... 8 more > This is a negative regression as previous versions of Hadoop worked with these JREs -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 11:16:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B606C4276 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45956 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45887 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45877 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 11:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E799E264C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1573064541.48453.1306494947514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1093348183.29034.1305849887377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7312) core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040187#comment-13040187 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7312: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #701 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/701/]) HADOOP-7312. Update value of hadoop.common.configuration.version. Contributed by Harsh J Chouraria. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128003 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/core-default.xml > core-default.xml lists configuration version as 0.21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7312 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Harsh J Chouraria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7312-22.r1.diff, HADOOP-7312-23.r1.diff > > > This key was added in HADOOP-6233, though appears unused. I suppose it's somewhat useful to try to diagnose if someone has old versions of core-default.xml on the classpath. > Either way it should probably be updated to say 0.22 in the branch and 0.23 in trunk. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 14:27:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6C324137 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12115 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 14:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12026 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 14:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12018 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 14:27:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:27:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:27:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C47E201F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eric Caspole (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2142804085.48758.1306506407667.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040253#comment-13040253 ] Eric Caspole commented on HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------------- I only tried the patch on 6u23 and 6u25. There have been many hotspot compiler optimizations introduced especially since 6u21 and my general feeling is that people who are still running 6u10 etc are more worried about stability in their exact environment vs performance. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 16:54:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE1FD4C7C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33686 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 16:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33654 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 16:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33645 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 16:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:54:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C88BE3AA6 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:53:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1430888302.49062.1306515227572.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassi= an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6255: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.20.203.0) 0.23.0 0.20.204.0 Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I just committed this. Thanks, Eric! > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 16:56:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA7B14D0C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38120 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 16:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38092 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 16:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38084 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 16:56:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:56:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73129E3B69 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <290744278.49093.1306515347468.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 40319#comment-13040319 ]=20 Hudson commented on HADOOP-6255: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #625 (See [https://builds.apache.o= rg/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/625/]) HADOOP-6255. Create RPM and Debian packages for common. Changes deploym= ent layout to be consistent across the binary tgz, rpm, and deb. Adds setup scripts for easy one node cluster configuration and user creation. (Eric Yang via omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=3DApache-SVN&view=3Drev&r= ev=3D1128385 Files :=20 * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/postinst * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/mapred_t= utorial.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/stop-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-tasktracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-single-node.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/runAs.c * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/spec/hadoop.spec * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/control * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/prerm * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/cluster_set= up.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-namenode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates/conf * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/preinst * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/libraries.properties * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/cluster_= setup.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-tasktracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/configure * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/Ma= kefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/slaves.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-jobtracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates/conf/core-site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-namenode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hod_admi= n_guide.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/rcc * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/single_node= _setup.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-datanode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/runAs.h.in * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/update-hadoop-env.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-jobtracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/spec * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/commands_ma= nual.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/quicksta= rt.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemons.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/conf/hadoop-env.sh.template * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-hdfs.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/commands= _manual.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/postrm * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/deployment_= layout.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/java/org/apache/hadoop/test/system/p= rocess/HadoopDaemonRemoteCluster.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/start-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/configure.ac * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-conf.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/conffile * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/streamin= g.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-create-user.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/lib/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-datanode > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 17:04:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03303452F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50081 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 17:04:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50051 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 17:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50039 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 17:04:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED80E3E98 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <243847304.49148.1306515827647.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 40326#comment-13040326 ]=20 Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-6255: ------------------------------------------------ Great job! We finally have RPM in Apache Hadoop. > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 17:04:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C2934579 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51798 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51766 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51758 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 17:04:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:04:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9F0E3EBA for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:03:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Scott Carey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1538852217.49180.1306515828908.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040327#comment-13040327 ] Scott Carey commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- In particular, hotspot had some changes in how it analyzes loops (loop predicates) and how it looks at register allocation as a result. I'm guessing that those changes are related. It is now as fast as the fastest C implementations on the latest JVM. I am a little disappointed that hotspot couldn't do this itself, but I suppose it makes sense to push changes to a member variable's memory address often because it can be read simultaneously. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 18:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79348494B for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13232 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13204 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13196 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5610DE3316 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <162067005.49500.1306522127349.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7325: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Brock Noland > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 18:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1559449C7 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17113 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17086 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17078 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 18:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81DE3442 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1010309377.49516.1306522247904.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers updated HADOOP-7325: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Hitting 'submit patch' so Hudson will run the pre-commit hooks. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 18:59:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E83604C74 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29600 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29576 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29568 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD41E375D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <209432576.49556.1306522728651.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040387#comment-13040387 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7333: ------------------------------------- Sounds like we're all on board. I'll commit momentarily. > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 18:59:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 259E54C82 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29837 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29810 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29751 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:59:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B043BE375F for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1744112265.49558.1306522728718.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk. Thanks, Eric! > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 19:05:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3439042DA for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32985 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 19:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32957 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 19:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32948 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 19:05:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DC9E393A for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 19:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1936308365.49580.1306523087532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1160101136.38164.1306200167436.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7325) hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040390#comment-13040390 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7325: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480193/hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch against trunk revision 1128385. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/535//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/535//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/535//console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop command - do not accept class names starting with a hyphen > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7325 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Reporter: Brock Noland > Assignee: Brock Noland > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-illegal-class-name-0.patch > > > If this is committed I will look at patches for hdfs and mapred. > When teaching a good portion of the students in every single class execute: > {code} > $ hadoop -fs ls / > {code} > The -fs is passed directly to the JVM and the JVM fails to start: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Unrecognized option: -fs > Could not create the Java virtual machine. > {code} > Which is confusing and typically requires explanation. The attached patch improves that behavior: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -fs ls / > Error: No command named `-fs' was found. Perhaps you meant `hadoop fs' > {code} > The only risk I can see is if someone is abusing the implementation of hadoop command doing something like so: > {code} > $ ./bin/hadoop -Xmx1g org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar > RunJar jarFile [mainClass] args... > {code} > The hadoop command does not appear to advertise allowing JVM options before the classname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 19:15:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B851F45FF for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37517 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 19:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37468 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 19:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37406 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 19:15:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:15:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A94E3C82 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 19:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 19:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1010720816.49615.1306523687994.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040397#comment-13040397 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #626 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/626/]) HADOOP-7333. Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32. Contributed by Eric Caspole. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128425 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/PureJavaCrc32.java > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 21:08:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00A654AF1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45013 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:08:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44980 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:08:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44968 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 21:08:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B838E3E33 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <314496369.49888.1306530467371.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7335) Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Force entropy to come from non-true random for tests ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7335 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7335 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build, test Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Minor Passing the system property {{-Djava.security.egd=file:///dev/urandom}} forces the JVM to seed its PRNG from non-true random (/dev/urandom) instead of the true random (/dev/random). This makes the tests run faster, since without it they often hang waiting for entropy while Jetty is initializing. We should turn this on for the test targets by default, so developers/hudson boxes don't have to make this change system-wide or use workarounds like rngtools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 21:44:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F16744F64 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90727 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90695 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90684 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCF3E3AF6 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1586355296.49985.1306532627446.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins reassigned HADOOP-7276: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Trevor Robinson +1 looks good. I also verified the x64 native build still works. > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 21:44:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E6BF4F6C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90993 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90928 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90813 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 21:44:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:44:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A41FE3AFB for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1802634104.49989.1306532627563.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040460#comment-13040460 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-7276: ------------------------------------- I don't see the findbugs warning locally. Don't think a test is needed since this to get the code compiling. {noformat} [exec] [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. [exec] Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. [exec] {noformat} > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 21:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B3EB45F9 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95694 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95658 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95650 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 21:48:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:48:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:48:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9117CE3C48 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 21:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 21:47:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <215166959.49995.1306532867591.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-7276: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed this to trunk. Thanks Trevor! > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 22:06:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFB44E93 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10856 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10780 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10726 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 22:06:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:06:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA643E313E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1765227103.50045.1306533947825.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040467#comment-13040467 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7276: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #627 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/627/]) HADOOP-7276. Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32. Contributed by Trevor Robinson eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128475 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/configure.ac * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/lib/Makefile.am > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 22:31:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E0A24F3E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33430 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33383 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33375 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 22:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:31:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0FE3AA8 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <572891901.50112.1306535448397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nigel Daley updated HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch New auth patch that correct paths now that everything is going under common. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 22:52:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18AF346FB for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45725 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45669 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45567 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667FFE3092 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7336 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:02:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC67D443E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56369 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56343 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56335 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:02:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D13E330E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1736647063.50200.1306537307545.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7336: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B670A447D for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56629 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:02:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56596 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:02:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56588 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:02:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D18E330A for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1053116384.50198.1306537307491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7336: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:20:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD7A0472E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78552 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78527 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78519 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:20:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:20:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:20:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855A3E36B0 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:19:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1528936420.50221.1306538387542.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040495#comment-13040495 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7336: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480716/HADOOP-7336.2.patch against trunk revision 1128475. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/536//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/536//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/536//console This message is automatically generated. > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:49:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB73C48FD for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8071 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8037 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8029 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE3E3D9E for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7337 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE Priority: Minor The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:51:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB6324932 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9882 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9844 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9834 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D02E3E81 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <480999673.50281.1306540247790.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7337: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: c7337_20110527.patch c7337_20110527.patch: changed the annotation to public stable. > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13FE14948 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10138 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10082 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9919 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1965E3E83 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <180402026.50283.1306540247855.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7337: ------------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri May 27 23:53:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA4F14993 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11762 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11736 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 23:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11725 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2011 23:53:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:53:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:53:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5577DE3F0C for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1651213885.50286.1306540367346.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040506#comment-13040506 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7337: ------------------------------------- +1 > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 00:01:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE77E4457 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14780 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:01:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14730 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:01:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14707 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 00:01:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:01:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:01:34 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D8CE3196 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 00:00:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <118923021.50328.1306540854025.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7338) LocalDirAllocator improvements for MR-2178 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 LocalDirAllocator improvements for MR-2178 ------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7338 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7338 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Fix For: 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-7338.txt These are some changes that come from the following yahoo-merge commit, necessary for MAPREDUCE-2178 to build. commit 446e41f2424ddc866770cda677450c18feeb597f Author: Chris Douglas Date: Sun Oct 3 02:00:15 2010 -0700 Apply y201 to trunk git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge@1079151 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 00:03:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CDEF4DA6 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17039 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:03:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17001 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:03:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16993 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 00:03:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:03:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:03:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3C3E324A for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 00:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1808502900.50337.1306540967386.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <118923021.50328.1306540854025.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7338) LocalDirAllocator improvements for MR-2178 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7338: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-7338.txt Attaching patch from yahoo-merge. This probably needs a couple unit tests. > LocalDirAllocator improvements for MR-2178 > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7338 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7338 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-7338.txt > > > These are some changes that come from the following yahoo-merge commit, necessary for MAPREDUCE-2178 to build. > commit 446e41f2424ddc866770cda677450c18feeb597f > Author: Chris Douglas > Date: Sun Oct 3 02:00:15 2010 -0700 > > Apply y201 to trunk > > git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/yahoo-merge@1079151 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 00:05:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9C034171 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17780 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17687 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17679 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 00:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E99E333E for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 00:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <615720184.50347.1306541087606.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040514#comment-13040514 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7337: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480721/c7337_20110527.patch against trunk revision 1128475. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/537//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/537//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/537//console This message is automatically generated. > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 04:53:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 511FE64A5 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 04:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3703 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 04:53:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3489 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 04:53:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3480 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 04:53:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 04:53:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 04:53:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E2E481E for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 04:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 04:52:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1350909266.50575.1306558367463.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1682376274.1991.1305078887341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7273) Move JMXGet from hdfs to common MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040547#comment-13040547 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on HADOOP-7273: ------------------------------------------ Is it Hadoop-dependent? Why not spin it out all the way to make it available to others? > Move JMXGet from hdfs to common > ------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7273 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7273 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > > JMXGet is generally useful especially for testing JMX attributes. Let's move it from o.a.h.hdfs.tools to o.a.h.tools. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 236586BAB for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31418 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31373 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31364 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E55FE4A08 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1824584104.50742.1306581349055.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6255) Create an rpm integration project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D130= 40575#comment-13040575 ]=20 Hudson commented on HADOOP-6255: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #702 (See [https://builds.apache.org/huds= on/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/702/]) HADOOP-6255. Create RPM and Debian packages for common. Changes deploym= ent layout to be consistent across the binary tgz, rpm, and deb. Adds setup scripts for easy one node cluster configuration and user creation. (Eric Yang via omalley) omalley : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=3DApache-SVN&view=3Drev&r= ev=3D1128385 Files :=20 * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/postinst * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/mapred_t= utorial.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/stop-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-tasktracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-single-node.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/runAs.c * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemon.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/spec/hadoop.spec * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/control * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/prerm * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-config.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/cluster_set= up.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-namenode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates/conf * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/preinst * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy/libraries.properties * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/cluster_= setup.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-tasktracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/configure * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/Ma= kefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/slaves.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-jobtracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/templates/conf/core-site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-namenode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/hod_admi= n_guide.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/rcc * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/single_node= _setup.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/packageNativeHadoop.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/init.d/hadoop-datanode * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/runAs.h.in * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/update-hadoop-env.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-jobtracker * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/spec * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/commands_ma= nual.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/quicksta= rt.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/hadoop-daemons.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/conf/hadoop-env.sh.template * /hadoop/common/trunk/ivy.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/build.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-hdfs.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/commands= _manual.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/postrm * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/deployment_= layout.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/java/org/apache/hadoop/test/system/p= rocess/HadoopDaemonRemoteCluster.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d * /hadoop/common/trunk/bin/start-all.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/system/c++/runAs/configure.ac * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-setup-conf.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/deb/hadoop.control/conffile * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/docs/cn/src/documentation/content/xdocs/streamin= g.xml * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/hadoop-create-user.sh * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/lib/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/packages/rpm/init.d/hadoop-datanode > Create an rpm integration project > --------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6255 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6255 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 0.20.203.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Eric Yang > Fix For: 0.20.204.0, 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-1.patch, HADOOP-625= 5-branch-0.20-security-10.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-11.patch,= HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-12.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-securit= y-13.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.= 20-security-3.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-4.patch, HADOOP-6255-= branch-0.20-security-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-6.patch, HAD= OOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-8.p= atch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-security-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-branch-0.20-sec= urity.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-10.= patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-11.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-12.patch= , HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-4.patch, HADOO= P-6255-common-trunk-5.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-6.patch, HADOOP-6255-= common-trunk-7.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk-8.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-= trunk-9.patch, HADOOP-6255-common-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk-1.pat= ch, HADOOP-6255-hdfs-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk-1.patch, HADOOP-= 6255-mapred-trunk-2.patch, HADOOP-6255-mapred-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6255.patc= h, deployment.pdf, deployment.tex > > > We should be able to create RPMs for Hadoop releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 347676BBD for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31506 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31387 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31374 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 11:16:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F197E4A14 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1787864975.50754.1306581349583.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <532896131.3523.1305130907394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7276) Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040577#comment-13040577 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7276: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #702 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/702/]) HADOOP-7276. Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32. Contributed by Trevor Robinson eli : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128475 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/configure.ac * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/Makefile.am * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/native/lib/Makefile.am > Hadoop native builds fail on ARM due to -m32 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7276 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: native > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > COLLECT_GCC=gcc > COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.2/lto-wrapper > Target: arm-linux-gnueabi > Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-multiarch-defaults=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --libdir=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-plugin --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --with-plugin-ld=ld.gold --enable-objc-gc --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=softfp --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --build=arm-linux-gnueabi --host=arm-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-linux-gnueabi > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ uname -a > Linux panda0 2.6.38-1002-linaro-omap #3-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 15 14:00:54 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > Reporter: Trevor Robinson > Assignee: Trevor Robinson > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-common-arm.patch > > > The native build fails on machine targets where gcc does not support -m32. This is any target other than x86, SPARC, RS/6000, or PowerPC, such as ARM. > $ ant -Dcompile.native=true > ... > [exec] make all-am > [exec] make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c -o ZlibCompressor.lo `test -f > 'src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c' || echo > '/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/'`src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > [exec] libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include > -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/include/linux > -I/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib > -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/security -Isrc/org/apache/hadoop/io/nativeio/ > -g -Wall -fPIC -O2 -m32 -g -O2 -MT ZlibCompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF > .deps/ZlibCompressor.Tpo -c > /home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/src/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/io/compress/zlib/ZlibCompressor.c > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ZlibCompressor.o > [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/trobinson/dev/hadoop-common/build/native/Linux-arm-32' > [exec] cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" > [exec] make[1]: *** [ZlibCompressor.lo] Error 1 > [exec] make: *** [all] Error 2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 11:16:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DCAB6BCF for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31882 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31855 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 11:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31847 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 11:16:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:16:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A45E4A12 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <118885136.50752.1306581349490.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1654473161.45482.1306422287498.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7333) Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040576#comment-13040576 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7333: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #702 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/702/]) HADOOP-7333. Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32. Contributed by Eric Caspole. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128425 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/PureJavaCrc32.java > Performance improvement in PureJavaCrc32 > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7333 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7333 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Environment: Linux x64 > Reporter: Eric Caspole > Assignee: Eric Caspole > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7333.patch, c7333_20110526.patch > > > I would like to propose a small patch to > org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32.update(byte[] b, int off, int len) > Currently the method stores the intermediate result back into the data member "crc." I noticed this method gets > inlined into DataChecksum.update() and that method appears as one of the hotter methods in a simple hprof profile collected while running terasort and gridmix. > If the code is modified to save the temporary result into a local and just once store the final result back into the data member, it results in slightly more efficient hotspot codegen. > I tested this change using the the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32 on a variety of linux x64 AMD and Intel multi-socket and multi-core systems I have available to test. > The patch removes several stores of the intermediate result to memory yielding a 0%-10% speedup in the "org.apache.hadoop.util.TestPureJavaCrc32$PerformanceTest" which is embedded in the existing unit test for this class, TestPureJavaCrc32. > > If you use a debug hotspot JVM with -XX:+PrintOptoAssembly, you can see the intermediate stores such as: > 414 movq R9, [rsp + #24] # spill > 419 movl [R9 + #12 (8-bit)], RDX # int ! Field PureJavaCrc32.crc > 41d xorl R10, RDX # int > The patch results in just one final store of the fully computed value. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 22:35:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADCBF63F2 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2249 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 22:35:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2223 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 22:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2215 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 22:35:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:35:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:35:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531B9E5697 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <676652622.51268.1306622087336.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-7337: ------------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) No new tests added since this is an annotation and javadoc change. Thanks Todd for the review. I have committed this. > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat May 28 22:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A15F46795 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4979 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4944 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4936 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2011 22:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A2E585B for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1014636354.51288.1306622687359.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040688#comment-13040688 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7337: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #628 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/628/]) HADOOP-7337. Change PureJavaCrc32 annotations to public stable. szetszwo : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128789 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/PureJavaCrc32.java > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 01:57:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189996303 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81235 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 01:57:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81167 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 01:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81159 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 01:57:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:57:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:57:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F35E5594 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kevin Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1942225372.51490.1306634207869.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040721#comment-13040721 ] Kevin Wang commented on HADOOP-6767: ------------------------------------ Hi Guys, I am pretty new to this site. I am wondering when this patch can be accepted? Thanks, Kevin > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Labels: blockdecompressorstream > Attachments: HADOOP-6767.patch, Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 02:01:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C0AC43B8 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82467 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 02:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82436 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 02:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82428 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 02:01:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08965E5681 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 02:00:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kevin Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1023851985.51506.1306634448032.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040722#comment-13040722 ] Kevin Wang commented on HADOOP-6767: ------------------------------------ Hi Volodymyr, I am wondering whether you have plan to migrate the change to JNI and Apache Daemon? Thanks, Kevin > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Labels: blockdecompressorstream > Attachments: HADOOP-6767.patch, Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 03:58:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B80534DBE for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28515 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 03:58:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28489 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 03:58:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28480 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 03:58:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:58:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:58:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E48E65C2 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 03:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tanping Wang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <703410915.51559.1306641467991.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <504299282.44039.1306374047470.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7331) Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040735#comment-13040735 ] Tanping Wang commented on HADOOP-7331: -------------------------------------- The idea is to simply check if the PID still exists shortly after the JVM of the daemon process is created. As discussed early, we are simplifying the solution to deal with common scenarios that may cause JVM to die shortly after the JVM is created, such as invalid configuration files. And yes, this is machine specific. We do not have data to show how much exact time the JVM may die on top of commodity hardware. This is to provide the operator a quick feedback if JVM may not have been started if some straight-forward mis-configuration has happened. And regarding to why choose 3 seconds?? If you notice that there is also {code} sleep 1; head "$log" {code} in the same question can be asked regarding to why choose 1 second. I simply want to give a few seconds before checking the existence of JVM after its starts. And I can certainly make this sleep time configurable for the operators to adjust. (BTW, what are you referring to by "one of those"?) > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7331 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7331 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: scripts > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Tanping Wang > Assignee: Tanping Wang > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7331.2.patch, HADOOP-7331.patch > > > Makes hadoop-daemon.sh to return 1 if daemon processes did not get started. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 11:15:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E69404009 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99007 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 11:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98976 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 11:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98967 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 11:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F922E6A12 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <973348227.51816.1306667687519.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1956994843.50267.1306540127404.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7337) Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040784#comment-13040784 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7337: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #703 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/703/]) HADOOP-7337. Change PureJavaCrc32 annotations to public stable. szetszwo : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1128789 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/PureJavaCrc32.java > Annotate PureJavaCrc32 as a public API > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7337 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: c7337_20110527.patch > > > The API of PureJavaCrc32 is stable. It is incorrect to annotate it as private unstable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 11:29:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 659FC459D for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6134 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 11:29:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6084 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 11:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6076 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 11:29:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:29:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:29:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2287FE6DA3 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 11:28:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Volodymyr Orlov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <584053657.51842.1306668528138.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6767) Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040788#comment-13040788 ] Volodymyr Orlov commented on HADOOP-6767: ----------------------------------------- Hi Kevin, Despite the fact that I haven't done anything regarding this patch I am still planning to continue my work on it. The problem that I have faced with is that I won't have an opportunity to test my patch in a real deployment scenario as soon as I will finish it. In company, where I am wokring now we are not deploying Hadoop on Windows machines any more. That's why I can't see any real application for my possible contribution in this area. If you are interested in Hadoop on Windows, and you have Windows machines and intention to deploy your Hadoop cluster on them, we could combine our efforts and finish this patch. Here is my email address - vorl@codeminders.com. Please feel free to contact me if you are interested in my proposal. Vladimir > Patch for running Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6767 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6767 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build, conf, scripts > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Environment: Windows XP, 2003, 7, 2008 > Reporter: Volodymyr Orlov > Labels: blockdecompressorstream > Attachments: HADOOP-6767.patch, Hadoop-0.20.2-patched.zip, hadoop-6767-r1.tar.gz > > > Proposed patch from Codeminders adds a possibility to run Hadoop on Windows without Cygwin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 22:27:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A74194C8A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7175 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 22:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7143 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 22:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7132 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 22:27:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:27:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D602D9922 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:26:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <625942760.52355.1306708008182.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040891#comment-13040891 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- Hey Nigel. I'm working on testing this against a local mirror of the ASF svn repository. I noticed that the svn:externals settings at the bottom are inconsistent - the src/test ones all use https:// URLs but the site/ ones use http://. Is that on purpose? > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun May 29 23:03:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 992304A8A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12779 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12752 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12744 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F88AD9DBD for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <97603347.52365.1306710167388.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040894#comment-13040894 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7336: ------------------------------------- +1 > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 01:47:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9743432E for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69992 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 01:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69961 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 01:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69953 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 01:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68220E8FC0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 01:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1260388168.52549.1306720007423.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7106-git.sh HADOOP-7106.sh > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 02:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A8D962A5 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79601 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79476 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79406 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 02:02:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:02:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:02:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8566FE8232 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 02:01:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1905605821.52599.1306720908543.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040971#comment-13040971 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- This afternoon I performed the following tests: - I set up a local mirror from last month's SVN dump, and then used the ASF's git mirror scripts to create a local git mirror as well. - Modified Nigel's HADOOP-7106.sh script with following changes: -- parameterized svn location (the version of svn on my rhel box didn't support the --depth argument) -- parameterized SVN root, so I could point it at my local mirror -- fixed the svn externals links to point at hadoop/common/trunk/common instead of hadoop/trunk/common - Ran Nigel's script and verified that trunk and branch-0.22 had the correct layout - Committed it to my local svn mirror - ran the "update-mirror.sh" git mirror script. This took 20 minutes or so as it pulled in all of the history from the new branches. It might take longer upstream. At this point, the git mirror showed a single commit in trunk that moved all of the files inside common/ and added hdfs/* and mapreduce/* as new files (rather than detecting any kind of merge). This is what I expected I tried a few things at this point, but ran into some limitations of git: namely, that git won't detect renames that happen as part of a merge commit. So, I took the following angle of attack in a local repo: - fetch trunk from hadoop-hdfs.git (this is the last commit before 7106 is committed -- since 7106 removed the svn directory, the hdfs.git repo basically got frozen at this point) - add a new commit where I mv everything inside an hdfs/ directory - do the same thing for mapreduce - do the same thing for common (with the commit right before HADOOP-7106 - create a new commit for "trunk" which has the above three branches as parents, and the same log message: {noformat} commit 34f047ed9e435be5932d53165477064144f5961c Merge: 898037a 2ec2d49 0619a1a Author: Todd Lipcon Date: Sun May 29 18:35:31 2011 -0700 HADOOP-7106. Re-organize layout git-svn-id: file:///data/1/todd/asf-load/hadoop/common/trunk@1098499 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 {noformat} - verified that commands like "git log -M --follow hdfs/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSEditLog.java" properly follow the history through the merge - force push this new 'trunk' back into hadoop-common.git:refs/remotes/trunk Next I made some svn commits in the merged repo and verified that the 'update-mirror.sh' script pulled them in on top of the merge with no problems. A script to perform the above sequence is attached here as HADOOP-7106-git.sh. In order to do this on ASF, I'll need to have access to the box that does the git mirroring. I guess I need to talk to Infra people to get that. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 03:29:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBD1B6859 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24319 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 03:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24195 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 03:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24183 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 03:29:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C53FE8EDE for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1164026560.52642.1306726127506.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040983#comment-13040983 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7208: ------------------------------------- - There are still hard tabs in this patch. - there is no contract that hashCode() has to differ if two objects are unequal -- so your unit test there is not valid - for the implementation of hashcode, might as well use getClass().hashCode() -- you don't need to get the class name > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 03:29:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CB956866 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24504 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 03:29:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24437 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 03:29:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24213 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 03:29:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE18E8EE2 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <657986535.52646.1306726127651.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7208: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 04:01:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDFC86CFD for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46642 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 04:01:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46421 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 04:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46400 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 04:01:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:01:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:01:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4CAE850A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 04:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <210230351.52692.1306728047907.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1117582463.32721.1304959323395.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7269) S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13040993#comment-13040993 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7269: ------------------------------------- Hi Nicholas. Sorry I missed this on the first pass -- it looks like your test case stores a file with metadata, but you don't do any check to make sure that it can be retrieved again with retrieveMetadata. Would you mind adding that? > S3 Native should allow customizable file meta-data (headers) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7269 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs/s3 > Reporter: Nicholas Telford > Assignee: Nicholas Telford > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-001.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-002.diff, HADOOP-7269-S3-metadata-003.diff > > > The S3 Native FileSystem currently writes all files with a set of default headers: > * Content-Type: binary/octet-stream > * Content-Length: > * Content-MD5: > This is a good start, however many applications would benefit from the ability to customize (for example) the Content-Type and Expires headers for the file. Ideally the implementation should be abstract enough to customize all of the available S3 headers and provide a facility for other FileSystems to specify optional file metadata. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 05:27:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1035265FC for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81459 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:27:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81236 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:27:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81221 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 05:27:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601DEE865A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7339 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: util Reporter: Min Zhou We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. Test case: terasort 100MB. Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 05:35:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E47B96B2C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85062 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84873 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84865 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 05:35:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:35:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:35:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544A4E8830 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:34:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1203876943.52751.1306733687341.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Zhou updated HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) submit a patch for this issue > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 05:37:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F3DB6B44 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85272 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:37:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85236 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85228 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 05:37:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:37:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:37:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BBEE88B8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:36:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1458416602.52753.1306733807548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Zhou updated HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff submit a patch for this issue > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 05:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AB696B5D for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85844 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:43:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85732 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 05:43:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85723 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 05:43:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:43:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:43:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65931E89E0 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <640983355.52757.1306734167412.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041006#comment-13041006 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480818/HADOOP-7339-v1.diff against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/538//console This message is automatically generated. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 06:03:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 176DB615F for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96064 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95943 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95935 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 06:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2A1E8E65 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <852334824.52781.1306735367370.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Zhou updated HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7339-v2.diff fixed svn conflicts. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 06:07:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BECF664A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99640 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:07:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99615 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:07:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99607 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 06:07:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:07:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:07:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583FEE8F40 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:06:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <545185438.52783.1306735607358.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041010#comment-13041010 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7339: ------------------------------------- I understand how this could make a big difference using the builtin CRC32. But, with PureJavaCrc32, there shouldn't be any particularly large advantage to buffering like this. Did you see a speedup in terasort performance? Just seeing fewer calls doesn't necessarily mean it's an improvement. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 06:09:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AF9F6669 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 125 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99997 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:09:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99985 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 06:09:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:09:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:09:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFE0E8FE1 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <475994145.52785.1306735727377.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041011#comment-13041011 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7339: ---------------------------------- Orginal source file in svn has many DOS characters which would caused a failure when appling this patch. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 06:25:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8697E6BB6 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9598 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:25:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9411 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:25:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9387 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 06:25:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:25:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55759E8447 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Min Zhou (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1979466764.52793.1306736687346.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041012#comment-13041012 ] Min Zhou commented on HADOOP-7339: ---------------------------------- @Todd I don't think this patch can speed up terasort. This method is not a bottleneck of a MR job. Random seeks during the shuffle stage should be the bottle bottleneck. This patch helps reducing CPU consuming, which i think can also be ragarded as an improvement. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 06:31:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E86B1640E for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11848 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:31:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11638 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 06:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11627 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 06:31:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0FDE8633 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:30:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <85338105.52804.1306737047709.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041014#comment-13041014 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480819/HADOOP-7339-v2.diff against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/539//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/539//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/539//console This message is automatically generated. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 12:17:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E3F26606 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7533 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 12:17:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7479 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 12:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7471 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 12:17:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:17:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910E7E865E for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:16:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "HariSree (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <589599883.53275.1306757807590.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-702) DFS Upgrade Proposal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041105#comment-13041105 ] HariSree commented on HADOOP-702: --------------------------------- What is the expectation in the following scenario : Namenode has 3 name dirs configured .. 1) Namenode upgrade starts - Upgrade fails after 1st directory is upgraded (2nd and 3rd dir is left unchanged ..) 2) Namenode starts 3) Namenode shutdown and rollbacked Are the new changes done meant to be visible ? With current implementation , after a rollback new changes are visible .. Is this expected ?? As per my observation , since Namenode is saving the latest image dir(the upgraded 1st dir since checkpointtime is incremented during upgrade for this dir) will be loaded and saved to all dirs during loadfsimage .. But if a ROLLBACK is done , the 1st dir will be rolled back (the older copy becomes current and its checkpointtime is now LESS than other dirs ..) and others left behind since they dont contain previous .. Now during loadfsimage , the 2nd dir will be selected since it has the highest checkpoint time and saved to all dirs (including 1st ) .. Now due to this , the new changes b/w UPGRADE and ROLLBACK present in 2nd dir gets reflected even after ROLLBACK .. Is this expected ? I ask this since : 1) this is not the case with a SUCCESSFULL Upgrade/Rollback (New changes lost after rollback).. & 2) FSStateTransition7.htm says { r0. if previous directory does not exist then fail rollback } , but it continues in the current implementation .. > DFS Upgrade Proposal > -------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-702 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: DFSUpgradeProposal3.html, FSStateTransition6.htm, FSStateTransition7.htm, FSStateTransitionApr03.patch, Manual-TestCases-HdfsConversion.txt, TestPlan-HdfsUpgrade.html, TestPlan-HdfsUpgrade.html, TestPlan-HdfsUpgrade.html > > > Currently the DFS cluster upgrade procedure is manual. > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-hadoop/Hadoop_Upgrade > It is rather complicated and does not guarantee data recoverability in case of software errors or administrator mistakes. > This is a description of utilities that make the upgrade process almost automatic and minimize chance of loosing or corrupting data. > Please see the attached html file for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 16:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA69D6D21 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71449 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 16:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71388 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 16:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71380 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 16:30:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:30:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:30:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8D1E9971 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <832868218.53721.1306772987383.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041190#comment-13041190 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7339: ------------------------------------- Hi Min. Maybe you could make a microbenchmark which uses IFile.Writer to write a few GB to a path in /dev/shm? This should cut IO out of the equation and give us an idea of the CPU reduction. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon May 30 19:22:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0925969F2 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20570 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20539 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20531 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2011 19:22:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:22:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:22:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973F7E997B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1848775783.53995.1306783307616.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1992675736.52742.1306733207390.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7339) Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041242#comment-13041242 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-7339: ----------------------------------- @min, you may minimize the impact of shuffle seek overhead by limiting the amount of input data, and choosing a small reducer number. The effect of CPU saturation may be more pronounced if you set the # of map slots > # of cores, and you use GZIP for intermediate data compression. > Introduce a buffered checksum for avoiding frequently calls on Checksum.update() > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7339 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7339 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Reporter: Min Zhou > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7339-v1.diff, HADOOP-7339-v2.diff > > > We found that PureJavaCRC32/CRC32.update() is the TOP 1 of the methods consuming CPU in a map side, and in reduce side, it cost a lots of CPU too. > IFileOutputStream would frequently call Checksum.update() during writing a record. It's very common a MR key/value less than 512 bytes. Checksum.update() would be called every time writing a key/value. > Test case: terasort 100MB. > Checksum.update() calls has be reduced from 4030348 to 28069. This method is not a hotspot anymore. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 07:27:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDC834B48 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66054 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66026 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66016 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 07:27:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:27:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:27:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E4EA43C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:26:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1586184196.55471.1306826807775.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 07:29:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 267754B65 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66511 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:29:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66461 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66445 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 07:29:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C646BEA575 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <493199464.55480.1306826927809.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 07:29:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 137F64B7D for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66788 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:29:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66478 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:29:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66466 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 07:29:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A463DEA571 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2014952348.55476.1306826927670.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Radia updated HADOOP-7284: --------------------------------- Attachment: trash10.patch > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 07:45:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E906D4951 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83563 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:45:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82969 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 07:45:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82945 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 07:45:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:45:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:45:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C470EAC05 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <148651276.55509.1306827887505.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041470#comment-13041470 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480908/trash10.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 17 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/540//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/540//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/540//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:09:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 269654F44 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74350 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:09:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74311 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74303 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:09:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5FEB069 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1517249960.55703.1306836527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6387) FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-6387: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6387.patch Make "source file pattern" work. > FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6387.patch > > > The FsShell -getmerge command doesn't work if the "source file pattern" matches files. See below. If the current behavior is intended then we should update the help documentation and java docs to match, but it would be nice if the user could specify a set of files in a directory rather than just directories. > {code} > $ hadoop fs -help getmerge > -getmerge : Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > $ hadoop fs -ls > Found 3 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/2.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/3.txt > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/*.txt sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > 1 > 2 > 3 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:16:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB68C447C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83214 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83170 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:16:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83162 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:16:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:16:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B450DEB2A7 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1821829737.55729.1306836947735.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-6387) FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-6387: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.23.0 Assignee: XieXianshan Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) this patch make "source file pattern" work. > FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6387.patch > > > The FsShell -getmerge command doesn't work if the "source file pattern" matches files. See below. If the current behavior is intended then we should update the help documentation and java docs to match, but it would be nice if the user could specify a set of files in a directory rather than just directories. > {code} > $ hadoop fs -help getmerge > -getmerge : Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > $ hadoop fs -ls > Found 3 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/2.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/3.txt > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/*.txt sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > 1 > 2 > 3 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:28:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD23E4A00 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1541 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:28:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1508 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:28:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1500 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:28:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:28:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:28:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611FCEB5CE for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <944188212.55742.1306837667394.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6387) FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041516#comment-13041516 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6387: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480923/HADOOP-6387.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these core unit tests: -1 system test framework. The patch failed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/541//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/541//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/541//console This message is automatically generated. > FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6387.patch > > > The FsShell -getmerge command doesn't work if the "source file pattern" matches files. See below. If the current behavior is intended then we should update the help documentation and java docs to match, but it would be nice if the user could specify a set of files in a directory rather than just directories. > {code} > $ hadoop fs -help getmerge > -getmerge : Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > $ hadoop fs -ls > Found 3 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/2.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/3.txt > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/*.txt sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > 1 > 2 > 3 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9784B4C56 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2012 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1980 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1970 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:30:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF1FEB668 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7340 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: XieXianshan Assignee: XieXianshan Fix For: 0.23.0 The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only one file on local fs. is kept." and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only one file on local fs. is kept. addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15606-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:32:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99DAE4647 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4157 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4115 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4107 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:32:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56671EB6EC for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:31:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <460389824.55755.1306837907350.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7340: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7340 > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15607-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:36:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC3F7433A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8963 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8918 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8910 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:36:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:36:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:36:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71131EB806 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "XieXianshan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1316420138.55759.1306838147459.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] XieXianshan updated HADOOP-7340: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Improve help message for fsShell "getmerge". > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15608-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 10:55:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5AF141A8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34027 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:55:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33999 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 10:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33989 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 10:55:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:55:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560CAEBDD3 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:54:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1897195668.55780.1306839287348.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041522#comment-13041522 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7340: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480925/HADOOP-7340 against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/542//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/542//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/542//console This message is automatically generated. > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15609-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 11:16:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13A43426C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54932 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54899 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54891 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 11:16:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:16:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F7CEB419 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:15:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Harsh J Chouraria (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <755509231.55802.1306840547418.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041528#comment-13041528 ] Harsh J Chouraria commented on HADOOP-7340: ------------------------------------------- I think the text can still be improved. For instance, reading that line still doesn't help me (who's never used 'addnl' before) understand _what_ it ought to be set to. Should I type {{-getmerge path1 path2 addnl}} or should I type {{-getmerge path1 path2 '\n'}}? > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15610-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:04:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B034834 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81192 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81146 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81138 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:04:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:04:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:04:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70748EB3F4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <413224117.56199.1306854227457.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7256-patch-2.patch > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch, HADOOP-7256-patch-2.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15611-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:05:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43A6548A2 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83934 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:05:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83899 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83890 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:05:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:05:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:05:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD4BEB4B1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:04:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <51189024.56205.1306854292631.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7208: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7208-3.patch > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15612-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:13:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B719B4B9B for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97293 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:13:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97250 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:13:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97233 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:13:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:13:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:13:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4290EB931 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uma Maheswara Rao G (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1677743433.56226.1306854767669.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <18917644.179531294294848031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7090) Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uma Maheswara Rao G updated HADOOP-7090: ---------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7090.0.patch > Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Gokul > Attachments: HADOOP-7090.0.patch > > > It is always a good practice to close the IO streams in a finally block.. > For example, look at the following piece of code in the Writer class of BloomMapFile > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > out.close(); > } > {code} > If an exception occurs during fs.create or on any other line, out.close() will not be executed.. > The following can reduce the scope of resorce leaks.. > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = null; > try{ > out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > }finally{ > IOUtils.closeStream(out); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15613-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:21:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27A074606 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12617 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:21:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12460 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12452 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:21:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:21:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:21:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4B2EBD81 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1404035813.56249.1306855247452.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7256: ------------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.20.2 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch, HADOOP-7256-patch-2.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15614-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:23:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EF50478A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18620 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18589 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18581 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E4BEBF38 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <83399774.56262.1306855367754.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <18917644.179531294294848031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7090) Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7090: ------------------------------------------- Affects Version/s: 0.23.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Gokul > Attachments: HADOOP-7090.0.patch > > > It is always a good practice to close the IO streams in a finally block.. > For example, look at the following piece of code in the Writer class of BloomMapFile > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > out.close(); > } > {code} > If an exception occurs during fs.create or on any other line, out.close() will not be executed.. > The following can reduce the scope of resorce leaks.. > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = null; > try{ > out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > }finally{ > IOUtils.closeStream(out); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15615-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:23:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 615F647BA for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19280 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19243 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19149 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:23:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633FFEBF48 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <145176474.56275.1306855368403.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7208: ------------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15616-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:23:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA55F47F0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20467 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20445 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20437 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:23:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:23:52 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC59EBF4F for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2126480424.56280.1306855368565.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan updated HADOOP-7208: ------------------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15617-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:35:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E1C144CB for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53285 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53253 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53244 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47ADEB6B5 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <642891181.56356.1306856089867.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-6387) FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041629#comment-13041629 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-6387: ------------------------------------- Using checkDest adds new logic that I don't think is warranted: The dest is supposed to be a file per the usage of copyMerge. With this change, if the given dest is a directory then the output is the dest + basename of the first source directory. I feel that's unexpected and surprisingly behavior, so I'd like to see that reverted. There's an easier way to get at the full arg list higher in the call stack: processArguments(). Hooking in there and eliminate processPath(s) since those are intended to process each path individually. In processArguments, make a call to super (don't copy-n-paste like in the patch), and then call FileUtil's copymerge. Implement processPathArgument with a null body to short-out the calls to the now removed processPath(s). (Just an aside: I've been tempted to eliminate the call to FileUtils and just use processPath to append to the dst file) > FsShell -getmerge source file pattern is broken > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6387 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: XieXianshan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6387.patch > > > The FsShell -getmerge command doesn't work if the "source file pattern" matches files. See below. If the current behavior is intended then we should update the help documentation and java docs to match, but it would be nice if the user could specify a set of files in a directory rather than just directories. > {code} > $ hadoop fs -help getmerge > -getmerge : Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > $ hadoop fs -ls > Found 3 items > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/1.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/2.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 eli supergroup 2 2009-11-23 17:39 /user/eli/3.txt > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/*.txt sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/eli/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > cat: sorted.txt: No such file or directory > $ hadoop fs -getmerge /user/* sorted.txt > $ cat sorted.txt > 1 > 2 > 3 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15618-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:35:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1851544D8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53539 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53505 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53487 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:35:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:30 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F7AEB6BA for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <983583704.56361.1306856090065.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <282223217.18947.1304436003652.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7256) Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041630#comment-13041630 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7256: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480943/HADOOP-7256-patch-2.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/543//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/543//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/543//console This message is automatically generated. > Resource leak during failure scenario of closing of resources. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7256 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7256 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7256-patch-1.patch, HADOOP-7256-patch-2.patch > > Original Estimate: 8h > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > Problem Statement: > =============== > There are chances of resource leak and stream not getting closed > Take the case when after copying data we try to close the Input and output stream followed by closing of the socket. > Suppose an exception occurs while closing the input stream(due to runtime exception) then the subsequent operations of closing the output stream and socket may not happen and there is a chance of resource leak. > Scenario > ======= > During long run of map reduce jobs, the copyFromLocalFile() api is getting called. > Here we found some exceptions happening. As a result of this we found the lsof value raising leading to resource leak. > Solution: > ======= > While doing a close operation of any resource catch the RuntimeException also rather than catching the IOException alone. > Additionally there are places where we try to close a resource in the catch block. > If this close fails, we just throw and come out of the current flow. > In order to avoid this, we can carry out the close operation in the finally block. > Probable reasons for getting RunTimeExceptions: > ===================================== > We may get runtime exception from customised hadoop streams like FSDataOutputStream.close() . So better to handle RunTimeExceptions also. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15619-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:35:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B703344E9 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53807 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53768 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:35:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53760 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:35:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:35:31 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09FFEB6C1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2076075170.56366.1306856090979.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <18917644.179531294294848031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7090) Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041631#comment-13041631 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7090: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480947/HADOOP-7090.0.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/544//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/544//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/544//console This message is automatically generated. > Possible resource leaks in hadoop core code > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7090 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7090 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.23.0 > Reporter: Gokul > Attachments: HADOOP-7090.0.patch > > > It is always a good practice to close the IO streams in a finally block.. > For example, look at the following piece of code in the Writer class of BloomMapFile > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > out.close(); > } > {code} > If an exception occurs during fs.create or on any other line, out.close() will not be executed.. > The following can reduce the scope of resorce leaks.. > {code:title=BloomMapFile .java|borderStyle=solid} > public synchronized void close() throws IOException { > super.close(); > DataOutputStream out = null; > try{ > out = fs.create(new Path(dir, BLOOM_FILE_NAME), true); > bloomFilter.write(out); > out.flush(); > }finally{ > IOUtils.closeStream(out); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15620-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 15:45:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3869F4B0A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73119 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:45:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73066 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 15:45:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73058 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 15:45:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:45:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8695FEBB0A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1120596033.56381.1306856687548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041635#comment-13041635 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7208: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480944/HADOOP-7208-3.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/545//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/545//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/545//console This message is automatically generated. > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15621-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 16:25:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6000742D6 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50770 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:25:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50734 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50726 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 16:25:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:25:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EE7EBC76 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1339894883.56464.1306859087475.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <53044194.55753.1306837788451.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7340) incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041651#comment-13041651 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7340: ------------------------------------- apparently [addnl] should be either "true" or "false"... but like the TODO says in CopyCommands.java, we should deprecate that and make it a flag like -addnl > incomplete help message is displayed for getmerge [addnl] option > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7340 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7340 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: XieXianshan > Assignee: XieXianshan > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7340 > > > The help message for the command "hdfs dfs -help getmerge" is displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept." > and the information about [addnl] option is missed,despite the fact that [addnl] option is implemented. > Therefore,the expected message should be displayed like this: > "-getmerge [addnl]: Get all the files in the directories that > match the source file pattern and merge and sort them to only > one file on local fs. is kept. > addnl Optionally addnl can be set to enable adding a newline > character at the end of each file." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15622-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 16:49:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 324144446 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96431 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:49:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96391 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96382 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 16:49:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:49:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:49:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BBBEB72E for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Fix option parsing in CommandFormat ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7341 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp Assignee: Daryn Sharp CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15623-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 16:58:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 461E345B4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6113 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:58:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6089 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 16:58:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6079 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 16:58:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:58:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:58:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75051EBA2C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:57:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1822961924.56560.1306861067475.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7284: -------------------------------- Attachment: trash11.patch as I was reviewing trash10.patch I did some trivial cleanup: fixed up a couple of typos, renamed "homedir" to "homedirPrefix", and relocated the new variable definition up to the top of the classes along with the rest of them. Sanjay, if these edits look OK to you, then +1. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash11.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15624-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 17:09:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 710EB4FB4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26261 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 17:09:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26233 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 17:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26225 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 17:09:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:09:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:09:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C899EBEFD for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <257527138.56610.1306861727572.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041678#comment-13041678 ] Aaron T. Myers commented on HADOOP-7341: ---------------------------------------- Now seems like a great time to scrap {{CommandFormat}} altogether, in favor of the capabilities provided by Commons CLI, a dependency which Hadoop already includes for use in the {{GenericOptionsParser}}. Thoughts? > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15625-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 17:15:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6AAC43DD for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36528 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 17:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36484 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 17:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36337 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 17:15:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:15:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:15:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C4DEB18C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:14:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <573038587.56628.1306862087491.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1946167265.7915.1305229907409.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7284) Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041681#comment-13041681 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7284: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480962/trash11.patch against trunk revision 1128789. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 18 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/546//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/546//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/546//console This message is automatically generated. > Trash and shell's rm does not work for viewfs > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7284 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7284 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Sanjay Radia > Assignee: Sanjay Radia > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: trash1.patch, trash10.patch, trash11.patch, trash2.patch, trash3.patch, trash4.patch, trash5.patch, trash6.patch, trash7.patch, trash8.patch, trash9.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15626-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 18:08:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 377194A35 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29472 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 18:08:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29443 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 18:08:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29435 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 18:08:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:08:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:08:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3F1ECAC7 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:07:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1896224663.56882.1306865267910.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041719#comment-13041719 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7341: ------------------------------------- hmm -- do you think it's correct behavior that we only support flags at the front of the args? Linux "ls" for example is fine with "ls / -l" > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15627-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 18:43:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7855A48A7 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16330 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16292 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16284 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 18:43:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:43:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F3EEB708 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1870506554.56972.1306867367397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7208: -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) +1. Committed to trunk. Thanks, Uma > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15628-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 19:00:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FC1347D6 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60635 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:00:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60608 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60600 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 19:00:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:00:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:00:32 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381FAEBF82 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:59:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <97534241.57040.1306868391219.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041752#comment-13041752 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HADOOP-7341: ------------------------------------- Aaron: I completely agree the parser needs to be changed, but I don't currently have the time available. My goal here is a very small/quick change to revert how every FsShell command (except count) to how it used to work. If you're ok with that, I think another jira should switch the parser. Todd: I suppose it comes down to whether hadoop should favor posix or gnu extensions? {noformat} $ mkdir a b $ ls a -l b a: total 0 b: total 0 $ POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 ls a -l b ls: -l: No such file or directory a: b: {noformat} I was just planning to restore the prior behavior. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15629-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 19:06:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE1984D25 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71756 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71726 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71718 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 19:06:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:06:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:06:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3B9EC2A0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:05:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <371115798.57068.1306868747575.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1195662636.6130.1300891805766.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7208) equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041758#comment-13041758 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7208: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #629 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/629/]) HADOOP-7208. Fix implementation of equals() and hashCode() in StandardSocketFactory. Contributed by Uma Maheswara Rao G. todd : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129840 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/ipc/TestSocketFactory.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/StandardSocketFactory.java > equals() and hashCode() implementation need to change in StandardSocketFactory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7208 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7208 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7208-2.patch, HADOOP-7208-3.patch, HADOOP-7208.patch > > > In Hadoop IPC Client, we are using ClientCache which will maintain the HashMap to keep the Client references. > private Map clients = > new HashMap(); > Now let us say, we want use two standard factories with Hadoop. MyStandardSocketFactory (which extends StandardSocketFactory), and StandardSocketFactory. In this case, because of equals and hashcode implementation, MyStandardSocketFactory client can be overridden by StandardSocketFactoryClient -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15630-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 19:20:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0FA147D7 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8381 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:20:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8338 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8323 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 19:20:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:20:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:20:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FC1EC886 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:19:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7342 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.23.0 Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15631-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 19:22:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABAFB49DC for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18108 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:22:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18076 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 19:22:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18012 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 19:22:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:22:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:22:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DF4EC989 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:21:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bharath Mundlapudi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1203219351.57135.1306869707590.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <397648942.57126.1306869588398.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7342) Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharath Mundlapudi updated HADOOP-7342: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7342-1.patch Attaching a patch for this. > Add an utility API in FileUtil for JDK File.list > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7342 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7342 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Bharath Mundlapudi > Assignee: Bharath Mundlapudi > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7342-1.patch > > > Java File.list API can return null when disk is bad or directory is not a directory. This utility API in FileUtil will throw an exception when this happens rather than returning null. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15632-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 20:01:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA4C54EC7 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53776 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53740 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53732 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 20:01:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:01:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:01:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B0EC80A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <142891067.57235.1306872047494.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041791#comment-13041791 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7341: ------------------------------------- ah, ok. I'm fine with just restoring the old behavior. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15633-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 20:45:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D302B4075 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59015 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:45:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58974 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58966 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 20:45:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:45:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:45:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81614EC6E8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:44:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <2058617390.57316.1306874687526.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041813#comment-13041813 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-7336: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #630 (See [https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/630/]) HADOOP-7336. TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. jitendra : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1129905 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/src/test/core/org/apache/hadoop/fs/TestFileContextResolveAfs.java > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15634-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 20:47:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AC634F80 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61110 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61071 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61063 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 20:47:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD90EC83B for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1133733464.57320.1306874807761.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7341.patch Stop at first non-option, like before. Also stop at opt/arg demarcation "--". Remove unnecessary & unused first param of null. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15635-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 20:47:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 631824FD8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61534 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:47:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61455 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61435 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 20:47:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:47:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1732EC83F for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1510539831.57324.1306874807920.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15636-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 20:51:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E89A744E2 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68093 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68047 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68039 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 20:51:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:51:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:51:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84179ECA34 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1357458239.57346.1306875047537.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1435375533.50176.1306536707416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7336) TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-7336: ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > TestFileContextResolveAfs will fail with default test.build.data property. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7336 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7336.2.patch > > > In TestFileContextResolveAfs if test.build.data property is not set and default is used, the test case will try to create that in the root directory and that will fail. /tmp should be used as default as in many other test cases. Normally, test.build.data will be set and this issue should not occur. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15637-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 21:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69AA84E4A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89372 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89154 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89138 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 21:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC49ECEB4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Graves (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1738050873.57393.1306875887708.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7343) backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-7343 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7343 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: test Affects Versions: 0.20.204.0 Reporter: Thomas Graves Assignee: Thomas Graves Priority: Minor backport HADOOP-7008 and HADOOP-7042 to branch-0.20-security so that we can enable test-patch.sh to have a configured number of acceptable findbugs and javadoc warnings -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15638-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 21:05:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D02A84E77 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90707 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:05:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90679 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:05:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90671 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 21:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76223ECEAD for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <350642054.57386.1306875887480.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041829#comment-13041829 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7341: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12480991/HADOOP-7341.patch against trunk revision 1129905. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1072 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1068 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/547//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/547//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/547//console This message is automatically generated. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15639-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 21:25:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CB554B82 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33788 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:25:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33757 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33736 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 21:25:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:25:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:25:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647CBEC615 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <737703557.57434.1306877087408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041841#comment-13041841 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------- I don't think the exception handling is appropriate. Why do you need to catch them at all? You certainly don't want to silently swallow Errors or mix their handling with IOExceptions. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15640-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 21:29:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF3784CC3 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45254 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:29:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45205 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:29:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45197 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 21:29:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:29:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:29:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F40EC7EE for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1403090349.57452.1306877327533.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041843#comment-13041843 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- Hi Nigel. I ran through my tests again with a clean mirror... one more thing came up: for branches like MR-279 and HDFS-1073, it seems like we want to create new merged branches as well - for MR279 it probably should be the "yahoo-merge" branches, and for HDFS-1073 it should be trunk. Do you agree? I don't think any of the other branches are "live". > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15641-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 21:49:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 995594CB8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74566 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74534 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 21:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74526 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 21:49:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:49:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:49:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64986ECE4A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:48:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <864548259.57518.1306878527408.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-7344) globStatus doesn't grok groupings with a slash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 globStatus doesn't grok groupings with a slash ---------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-7344 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7344 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.23.0 Reporter: Daryn Sharp If a glob contains a grouping with a single item that contains a slash, ex. "{a/b}", then globStatus throws {{"Illegal file pattern: Unclosed group near index 2"}} -- regardless of whether the path exists. However, if the glob set contains more than one item, ex. "{a/b,c}", then it throws a {{NullPointerException}} from {{FileSystem.java:1277}}. {code} 1276: FileStatus[] files = globStatusInternal(new Path(filePattern), filter); 1277: for (FileStatus file : files) { 1278: results.add(file); 1279: } {code} The method {{globStatusInternal}} can return null, so the iterator fails with the NPE. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15642-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:08:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0212D4722 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99533 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:08:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99472 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:08:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99464 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:08:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:08:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B2AEC332 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:07:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1094225103.57572.1306879668593.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041857#comment-13041857 ] Jukka Zitting commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------- As Todd already tested, the move as planned should work just fine from the perspective of the git.apache.org mirror. The HADOOP-7106-git.sh script looks nice. Todd, I'll sync up with you directly on how to best make this happen for git.apache.org. I suppose we should remove the hadoop-hdfs.git and hadoop-mapreduce.git mirrors once the svn tree has been reorganized. Do you want to also move the resulting shared svn structure one level up from hadoop/common/{trunk,branches,tags} to hadoop/{trunk,branches,tags} (and presumably rename the hadoop-common.git mirror to hadoop.git)? If yes, we'll need to figure out how to best do this without breaking history in the git mirror since our current move-svn-project.sh script can only handle cases where the entire svn structure is moved in a single svn move (like "svn move ^/incubator/project ^/project"). One possible solution (given help from svn admins) could be: {code:sh} $ svn move ^/hadoop ^/hadoop-tmp $ svn move ^/hadoop-tmp/common ^/hadoop $ svn move ^/hadoop-tmp/logos ^/hadoop/logos $ svn move ^/hadoop-tmp/nightly ^/hadoop/nightly $ svn delete ^/hadoop-tmp {code} Though I'm not sure how that would look like to existing svn checkouts. Another alternative is to simply move the trunk, branches and tags separately, and try to patch the git mirror to properly follow such svn history. Todd, you think you could come up with a script to do that. See the existing move-svn-project.sh script [1] for an example of the kind of history patching we now do for more regular svn moves. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/projects/git/bin/move-svn-project.sh > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15643-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:14:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBFBC4976 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9374 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9337 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:14:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9197 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:14:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:14:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:14:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E99EEC599 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:13:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <260270348.57602.1306880028318.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041865#comment-13041865 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------- Jukka, I'd proposed not changing the svn url for common precisely to avoid those breaks. *smile* > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15644-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:18:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B632947AB for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14523 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14496 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14488 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:18:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D486EC6A2 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Joseph Evans (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1403190025.57626.1306880267378.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1728703995.16605.1297739397760.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7144) Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041866#comment-13041866 ] Robert Joseph Evans commented on HADOOP-7144: --------------------------------------------- It is there because that is what tomcat is doing inside their JMXProxy Servlet which I modified, and didn't take the time to understand all of the possible exceptions that could be thrown in each of the cases to clean it up. Part of the reason for ignoring the exceptions is because JMX can execute arbitrary code inside the JMXBeans, which could throw all kinds of exceptions. Ideally we would like the code to be robust so that if some beans are causing issues that we can still output data for the rest of the beans. But I will look at what it takes to clean up the exception handling. > Expose JMX with something like JMXProxyServlet > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7144 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7144 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans > Labels: jmx > Fix For: 0.23.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7411-0.20.20X-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-V1.patch, HADOOP-7411-trunk-alpha.patch, jmx.json > > > Much of the Hadoop metrics and status info is available via JMX, especially since 0.20.100, and 0.22+ (HDFS-1318, HADOOP-6728 etc.) For operations staff not familiar JMX setup, especially JMX with SSL and firewall tunnelling, the usage can be daunting. Using a JMXProxyServlet (a la Tomcat) to translate JMX attributes into JSON output would make a lot of non-Java admins happy. > We could probably use Tomcat's JMXProxyServlet code directly, if it's already output some standard format (JSON or XML etc.) The code is simple enough to port over and can probably integrate with the common HttpServer as one of the default servelet (maybe /jmx) for the pluggable security. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15645-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:28:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 401E7426E for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26419 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26373 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26360 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:28:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:28:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7443ECA5A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:27:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <325261561.57659.1306880867747.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-7106: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7106.sh Another revision of the shell script that makes combined branches for HDFS-1073 out of (trunk,trunk,HDFS-1073) and MR-279 out of (yahoo-merge,MR-279,yahoo-merge). Will also need to update the git fixer script for this. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15646-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:30:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 926BE4560 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27910 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:30:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27881 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:30:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27873 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:30:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545EBECB26 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1171877622.57706.1306880988342.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041871#comment-13041871 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-7106: ------------------------------------- I agree with Owen - let's postpone the "shifting up a level" at this point. The extra layer of path heirarchy is just a minor annoyance. Maybe we can tackle it some other time -- but at this point I'm feeling pretty comfortable about the current plan and don't want to have to go through a bunch more testing. Jukka: do you do IRC? I'm usually idling in #asfinfra as tlipcon > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15647-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:30:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321EC45B1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28226 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28161 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28146 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:30:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:29 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EB2ECB22 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:48 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <878862694.57702.1306880988209.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <6014584.371831295027265635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7106) Re-organize hadoop subversion layout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041870#comment-13041870 ] Jukka Zitting commented on HADOOP-7106: --------------------------------------- Right! Sorry for overlooking your comment, Owen. If keeping the "common" bit in the svn URL is not a problem, then I'd recommend keeping it there to avoid the extra complexity. > Re-organize hadoop subversion layout > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-7106 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7106 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Nigel Daley > Assignee: Nigel Daley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-auth.patch, HADOOP-7106-git.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh, HADOOP-7106.sh > > > As discussed on general@ at http://tinyurl.com/4q6lhxm -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15648-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 22:52:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B71479F for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51210 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51137 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51129 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A718EC1E1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:51:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daryn Sharp (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <558167422.57769.1306882307629.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daryn Sharp updated HADOOP-7341: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-7341-2.patch clean up a few warnings > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15649-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 23:03:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B42C04B52 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63209 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63164 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63155 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 23:03:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:03:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:03:28 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6089DEC4D1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <1184738979.57792.1306882967392.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3255382.248681296161204958.JavaMail.jira@thor> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (HADOOP-7121) Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon reassigned HADOOP-7121: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Exceptions while serializing IPC call response are not handled well > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7121 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7121 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > We had a situation where for some reason the serialization of an RPC call's response was throwing OOME. When this happens, the exception is not caught, and the call never gets a response - the client just hangs. Additionally, the OOME propagated all the way to the top of the IPC handler and caused the handler. Plus, the Handler upon exit only logged to stdout and not to the log4j logs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-15650-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue May 31 23:05:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6BD3404A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63883 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:05:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63859 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2011 23:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63851 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2011 23:05:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:05:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:05:27 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79549EC5F3 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: <84557190.57802.1306883087493.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1470673003.56543.1306860527397.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-7341) Fix option parsing in CommandFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13041891#comment-13041891 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-7341: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12481006/HADOOP-7341-2.patch against trunk revision 1129905. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 system test framework. The patch passed system test framework compile. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/548//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/548//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/548//console This message is automatically generated. > Fix option parsing in CommandFormat > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-7341 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7341 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.23.0 > Reporter: Daryn Sharp > Assignee: Daryn Sharp > Attachments: HADOOP-7341-2.patch, HADOOP-7341.patch > > > CommandFormat currently allows options in any location within the args. This is not the intended behavior for FsShell commands. Prior to the redesign, the commands used to expect option processing to stop at the first non-option. > CommandFormat was an existing class prior the redesign, but it was only used by "count" to find the -q flag. All commands were converted to using this class, thus inherited the unintended behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7099-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 00:20:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23610 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 00:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 00:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69276 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 00:20:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69174 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 00:20:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69117 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 00:20:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:20:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1189.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:20:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51186234C4C5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <446984836.621421270081227331.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6669) zlib.compress.level ignored for DefaultCodec initialization In-Reply-To: <1208299192.618051270074867352.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852191#action_12852191 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6669: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440413/HADOOP-6669-0.patch against trunk revision 927979. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/436/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/436/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/436/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/436/console This message is automatically generated. > zlib.compress.level ignored for DefaultCodec initialization > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6669 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6669 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Koji Noguchi > Assignee: Koji Noguchi > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6669-0.patch > > > HADOOP-5879 added a compression level for codecs, but DefaultCodec seems to ignore this conf value when initialized. > This is only when codec is first created. reinit() probably sets it right. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7100-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 05:43:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40537 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 05:43:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 05:43:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27885 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 05:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27773 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 05:43:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27765 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 05:43:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:43:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:43:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F2234C4C5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1968610034.625451270100607611.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 05:43:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852256#action_12852256 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12439822/HADOOP-6658.patch against trunk revision 927979. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 2 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 1 warnings). -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/437/testReport/ Release audit warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/437/artifact/trunk/patchprocess/releaseAuditDiffWarnings.txt Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/437/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/437/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/437/console This message is automatically generated. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7101-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 06:07:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44448 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 06:07:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 06:07:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 41252 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 06:07:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40939 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 06:07:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40915 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 06:07:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 06:07:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 06:07:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDDD234C4CC for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <931278055.625871270102047379.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:07:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6670) UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables In-Reply-To: <242202762.620161270078590059.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6670: ---------------------------------- Attachment: fs-close.patch This patch fixes the problem and the testcases. I'm still getting a test case failure in the dist cache one. > UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: fs-close.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation objects are mutable, but they are used as keys in hash tables. This leads to serious problems in the FileSystem cache and RPC connection cache. We need to change the hashCode to be the identity hash code of the Subject and change equals to use == between the Subjects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7102-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 09:26:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86520 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 09:26:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 09:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26974 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 09:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26883 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 09:26:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26630 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 09:26:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:26:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:26:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCE4234C4C9 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <497521518.628591270113987444.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:26:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6640) FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block In-Reply-To: <1353980096.327641268867247264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852301#action_12852301 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6640: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440376/getFS.patch against trunk revision 927979. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/438/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/438/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/438/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/438/console This message is automatically generated. > FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: all > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Critical > Attachments: getFS.patch > > > If using FileSystem.get() in a multithreaded environment, and one get() locks because the NN URI is too slow or not responding and retries are in progress, all other get() (for the diffferent users, NN) are blocked. > the synchronized block in in the static instance of Cache inner class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7103-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 11:10:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5711 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 11:10:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 11:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 29900 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 11:10:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29862 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 11:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29763 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 11:10:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:10:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:10:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F150234C4B2 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:10:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To use maven for hadoop common builds ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6671 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] Drawbacks with the current approach: * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository * pom files are not generated dynamically To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7104-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 12:06:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22799 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 12:06:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 12:06:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 38260 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 12:06:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38149 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 12:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38135 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 12:06:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:06:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:06:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4E2234C4B2 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:06:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6672 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Xiao Kang BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7105-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 12:12:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23549 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 12:12:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 12:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 46102 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 12:12:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46057 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 12:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46040 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 12:12:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1194.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:12:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C198234C4B2 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1427827168.633331270123947244.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:12:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6672: ------------------------------ Attachment: screenshot-1.jpg A YJP screenshot attached. comparing as following: BytesWritable.write(DataOutput) 30%, 308k times DataOutputStream.writeInt() 23%, 308k times $Buffer.write() 21%, 1235k times DataOutputStream.write() 6%, 308k times $Buffer.write() 5%, 308k times > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7106-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 14:24:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 72587 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 14:24:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 14:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45035 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 14:24:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44809 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 14:24:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44795 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 14:24:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:24:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1195.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:24:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378AA234C4C8 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <903886190.635511270131867226.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:24:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852399#action_12852399 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------------ My initial thoughts is that every time someone tinkers with either ivy or maven or the build process in general, it always seems to get worse and worse for those of us that build on non-Internet connected machines. This sounds like another movement towards more pain. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7107-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:05:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85842 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:05:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:05:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 96459 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:05:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96432 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:05:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96424 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:05:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:05:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1196.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:05:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1650E234C4C7 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1419166118.635971270134328090.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:05:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852409#action_12852409 ] Patrick Angeles commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------------- Giri, I like the idea, and I'll pitch in however I can. @Allen You can very easily set up an internal proxy for Maven. I'm assuming your build machines have some kind of network access to get to the source code... > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7108-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:15:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91993 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:15:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8257 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:15:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8227 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8219 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:15:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:15:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:15:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69B5234C4C6 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <181748217.636131270134933812.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:15:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852413#action_12852413 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------------ No, they don't. I bulid on my desktop mac, let ivy download all of its stuff, then scp .ivy2 and the other stuff that ivy pulls in to my real build machine. So your assumption is false. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7109-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:21:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98014 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:21:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 23846 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:21:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23811 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23803 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:21:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:21:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:21:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B176234C4C6 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1850719995.636261270135287306.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:21:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852416#action_12852416 ] Patrick Angeles commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------------- How do you scp without network access? > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7110-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:25:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99272 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26132 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26105 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26097 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:25:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:25:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1196.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:25:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32459234C4C7 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <864816868.636371270135527205.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852419#action_12852419 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------------ They don't have access to the Internet. They do have internal network access. And, no, I'm not willing to setup a service to build code. I'm sure Maven is a great idea if you have a ton of resources (mainly time and effort). I don't. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7111-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 15:52:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8698 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 15:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 15:52:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 71822 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71780 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 15:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71772 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 15:52:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:52:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:52:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F44234C4C7 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <107979518.636661270137147228.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:52:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852423#action_12852423 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6671: ---------------------------------------- I've had bad experiences with M2 in the past; these colour my opinions. I don't know how much maven2 has improved since then. What I do have to deal with on a regular basis, even today, is people who write POM files who get the dependencies correct for their own build and test, but which screw up everyone else downstream. Recent logging JARs are an example. Accordingly, I view a POM file as an artifact for downstream users that you have to get right, not just some internal thing, as we can do today with ivy and ant files. This means saying "we should move to maven to eliminate having ivy.xml and POM files" isn't a good enough reason for me. If it improves testing, build times,-even to reduce ivy and ant xml maintenance costs, then yes , but not just "because you can". > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7112-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 16:02:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11408 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 16:02:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 16:02:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 83132 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:02:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83100 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83077 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 16:02:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:02:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:02:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A818234C4C6 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1453163482.636841270137747304.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:02:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6669) zlib.compress.level ignored for DefaultCodec initialization In-Reply-To: <1208299192.618051270074867352.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852428#action_12852428 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-6669: -------------------------------------- Hm. Didn't know that native library is not used in hudson testing. My unit test was testing 1) gzipcodec-native 2) defaultcodec-native 3) defaultcodec-non-native (1) and (2) are skipped in hudson testing. Hudson testReport showing bq. 2010-04-01 00:15:52,882 WARN compress.TestCodec (TestCodec.java:testCodecInitWithCompressionLevel(373)) - testCodecInitWithCompressionLevel for native skipped: native libs not loaded Testing manually, (2) and (3) failed without the patch and succeeded with the patch. > zlib.compress.level ignored for DefaultCodec initialization > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6669 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6669 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Koji Noguchi > Assignee: Koji Noguchi > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6669-0.patch > > > HADOOP-5879 added a compression level for codecs, but DefaultCodec seems to ignore this conf value when initialized. > This is only when codec is first created. reinit() probably sets it right. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7113-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 16:14:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14586 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 16:14:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 16:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 96161 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:14:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96119 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96111 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 16:14:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:14:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1196.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:14:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E95C234C4C8 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1215461248.636991270138467255.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:14:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852432#action_12852432 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------------- @Allen you can use mvn to do offline builds by passing -o argument @Steve Apart from maintaining ivy.xml and pom.xml, by having the pom file it reduces the build scripts maintenance. As the pom file has got standards for doing any kind of build stuff and its easy to maintain. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7114-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 16:58:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26383 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 16:58:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 16:58:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 55867 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55833 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55802 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 16:58:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:58:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1196.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:58:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3534F234C4C5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1070436824.637781270141108212.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:58:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7115-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 18:21:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47049 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 18:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 18:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 1544 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 18:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1501 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 18:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1344 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 18:21:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:21:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1197.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:21:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F291234C4CC for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <728382734.639531270146087257.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:21:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lee Tucker (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852490#action_12852490 ] Lee Tucker commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------ What it does do is provide a plugin architecture for a whole range of tools instead of having to roll each one independently into the build.xml. It provides project structure and actually improves inter-project communication by managing transitive build dependencies. Given that we already rely on net access (and maven repositories) to pull things through Ivy for dependencies, I'm not exactly sure how Maven makes that any worse. You had to fill a cache somehow already. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7116-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 19:59:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82553 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28305 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28275 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28260 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 19:59:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:59:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1198.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:59:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F3A234C4B2 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1956865453.641391270151967220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6673) nightly builds have incorrect VersionInfo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 nightly builds have incorrect VersionInfo ----------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6673 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6673 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: build Reporter: Aaron Kimball Snapshots of Hadoop trunk downloaded from Ivy have VersionInfo.getVersion() returning "Unknown" -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7117-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 20:16:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88236 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 20:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 20:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 68712 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68680 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68661 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 20:16:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:16:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB8B234C4E1 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1519562878.641851270152987383.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:16:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852530#action_12852530 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- A design document as Jeff suggested would be useful. I assume that the goal is still to make the RPC completely pulggable. i.e Till the AVRO path is stable, the default config uses the Hadoop RPC with the old serialization and that there is no -ve performance impact on the old code paths. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7118-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 20:50:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94541 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15688 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15629 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15621 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:50:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:50:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEECE234C4E5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <404415091.642751270155027715.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6670) UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables In-Reply-To: <242202762.620161270078590059.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6670: ---------------------------------- Attachment: fs-close.patch This patch changes UGI.hashCode to be the identity hash of the Subject and equals to check == between the subjects. > UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: fs-close.patch, fs-close.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation objects are mutable, but they are used as keys in hash tables. This leads to serious problems in the FileSystem cache and RPC connection cache. We need to change the hashCode to be the identity hash code of the Subject and change equals to use == between the Subjects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7119-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 20:50:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94673 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15845 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15806 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15798 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:50:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:50:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9718234C4E1 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1418757389.642711270155027693.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852541#action_12852541 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- > A design document as Jeff suggested would be useful. What's unspecified in current issues? If you like I can collate the comments on the various issues linked here into a single document if that would make them more readable for you. > I assume that the goal is still to make the RPC completely pluggable. i.e 'til the AVRO path is stable, the default config uses the Hadoop RPC with the old serialization and that there is no -ve performance impact on the old code paths. RPC is already pluggable w/o negative performance impact. That was done in HADOOP-6422. I don't expect that switching to Avro serialization for RPCs will affect performance, but that should certainly be tested before we make Avro serialization the default. Switching the transport is more likely to affect performance, but that switch can be made separately and after switching serializations. So I see something like the following steps: - HDFS -- get hdfs tests to pass using Avro RPC serialization -- test hdfs performance using Avro RPC serialization -- switch HDFS to use Avro RPC serialization by default -- design, implement and switch HDFS to use IDL-driven Avro RPC (HDFS-1069) - MapReduce -- get mapreduce tests to pass using Avro RPC serialization -- test mapreduce performance using Avro RPC serialization -- switch Mapreduce to use Avro RPC serialization by default -- design, implement and switch MapReduce to use IDL-driven Avro RPC (HDFS-1069) - Transport -- Design and develop an interoperable, secure, high-performance Avro transport (AVRO-341) -- port HDFS and MapReduce to use this optionally -- test HDFS and mapreduce with this new transport -- switch HDFS and Mapreduce to use new transport by default Would it be useful to file a Jira issue for each of these? > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7120-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 21:12:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 649 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 21:12:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 21:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 40671 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:12:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40644 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40636 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 21:12:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1198.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:12:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39401234C4CB for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1870935114.643041270156347233.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:12:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6640) FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block In-Reply-To: <1353980096.327641268867247264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852549#action_12852549 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6640: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #213 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/213/]) . FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block. Contributed by Hairong Kuang. > FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: all > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Critical > Attachments: getFS.patch > > > If using FileSystem.get() in a multithreaded environment, and one get() locks because the NN URI is too slow or not responding and retries are in progress, all other get() (for the diffferent users, NN) are blocked. > the synchronized block in in the static instance of Cache inner class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7121-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 21:36:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5741 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 21:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 21:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 71481 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:36:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71452 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71420 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 21:36:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:36:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1198.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:36:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490CC234C4D4 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1610879694.643521270157787298.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6640) FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block In-Reply-To: <1353980096.327641268867247264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6640: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this! > FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: all > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getFS.patch > > > If using FileSystem.get() in a multithreaded environment, and one get() locks because the NN URI is too slow or not responding and retries are in progress, all other get() (for the diffferent users, NN) are blocked. > the synchronized block in in the static instance of Cache inner class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7122-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 21:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11447 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 21:54:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 21:54:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 97233 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97190 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 21:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97174 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 21:54:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:54:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1198.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:54:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF01234C4CB for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <341005357.644031270158867457.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:54:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852569#action_12852569 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------------ Owen and Lee have told me that offline builds will have basically the same amount of pain that they do now. I'd be happier with less pain, but same is acceptable. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7123-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 22:24:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25968 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 22:24:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 22:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 29207 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:24:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29152 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29144 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 22:24:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:24:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:24:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66525234C4C9 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <366054150.644541270160667418.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:24:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6668.patch I have had a first attempt at applying annotations to the common codebase. They are summarized in this table; consult the patch for finer-grained detail. ||Package org.apache.hadoop.|| Visibility & Stability || Notes || |classification|public stable| Should we mark them evolving?| |conf|public stable| | |fs|public stable|filesystem implementations are public stable, but any internal classes are private unstable| |fs.shell|private unstable| | |http|limited-private unstable| | |io|public stable| | |io.compress|public stable| | |io.compress.bzip2|private unstable| | |io.compress.zlib|private unstable| | |io.file.tfile|public evolving| | |io.retry|limited-private evolving| | |io.serializer*|public evolving| | |ipc*|limited-private evolving| | |metrics*|public evolving| | |net|mixture of public evolving and limited-private unstable| | |record*|deprecated| | |security*|mixture of public/limited-private evolving?| | |util|public evolving|GenericOptionsParser, ReflectionUtils, Progressable, Tool, ToolRunner are public stable| |util.bloom|public stable| | |util.hash|public stable| | I haven't annotated the security APIs yet - if anyone has suggestions for these, I'd be grateful. I'm wondering whether to mark deprecated elements as 'evolving' (if they were deprecated in 0.19 or earlier), so that they can be removed sooner than the next major release. We wouldn't necessarily do this, but it might be wise to have the option. Here are some guidelines that I used in applying the annotations. Selecting the annotations to apply is a judgement call, so I'd appreciate feedback both on the general rules and the particular annotations I have applied. * Public user APIs should be marked as 'public stable'. These appear in public Javadoc. * APIs that are exposed to the user but not coded against directly should be marked as 'public evolving' (e.g. the metrics API, which is used in configuration). These appear in public Javadoc. * Non-user facing APIs that are used within Hadoop subprojects should be marked as 'limited-private evolving' (e.g. RPC) or 'limited-private unstable'. These appear in developer Javadoc. * Anything that is private implementation code should be marked as 'private unstable'. These appear in developer Javadoc. * If an API is not annotated then it defaults to the usual Java visibility and Apache Hadoop stability (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap) rules. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7124-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 22:30:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26633 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 22:30:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 22:30:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 34415 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:30:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34380 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:30:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34347 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 22:30:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:30:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:30:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4827234C4C5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2054761731.644751270161028935.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7125-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 22:54:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30096 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 22:54:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 22:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 55468 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:54:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55440 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 22:54:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55432 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 22:54:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:54:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:54:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFB2234C4CC for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1897051467.645171270162467449.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:54:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852590#action_12852590 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- With this patch (and HADOOP-6658) the public Javadoc would look like this: http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/api/ > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7126-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 23:10:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34678 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 69723 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69684 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69676 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:10:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:10:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7AC234C4C6 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1367642977.645421270163427250.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:10:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852594#action_12852594 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6668: -------------------------------------- The io.serializer.avro package should probably be public evolving. Perhaps all of io.serialization should be? > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7127-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 01 23:16:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35369 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 23:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 23:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 73376 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 23:16:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73291 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 23:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73283 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 23:16:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:16:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1199.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:16:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3728B234C4BE for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:16:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Performance Improvement in Secure RPC ------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6674 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7128-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 00:25:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45543 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13549 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13520 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13512 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 00:25:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:25:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:25:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38786234C4C7 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1945611333.647171270167927230.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:25:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852618#action_12852618 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440548/HADOOP-6668.patch against trunk revision 930096. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/439/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/439/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/439/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/439/console This message is automatically generated. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7129-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 00:31:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52750 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 00:31:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 00:31:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 16215 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:31:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16189 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16181 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 00:31:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:31:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1200.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:31:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6D1234C4C6 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <933986032.647271270168288119.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:31:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852620#action_12852620 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- > The io.serializer.avro package should probably be public evolving. Perhaps all of io.serialization should be? I agree - I marked all of the serializer classes as public evolving in the patch. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7130-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 00:45:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54877 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 00:45:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 00:45:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 21024 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:45:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20988 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 00:45:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20980 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 00:45:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:45:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:45:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50E234C4C5 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <486892632.647511270169127254.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 00:45:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6674: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch Patch for 20 branch. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7131-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 01:29:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61175 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 01:29:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 01:29:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 38914 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 01:29:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38815 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 01:29:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38807 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 01:29:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:29:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:29:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A05F234C4E3 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2108375054.648301270171767564.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 01:29:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Newman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852633#action_12852633 ] Alex Newman commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------- Howdy, This is really exciting as I feel currently that configs are a hard problem. Currently it can be difficult to get transparency and flexibility depending on the configs scope. Specifically, where do I audit if a user sets a particular job paramater, or an admin sets a paramater for a particular system. It seems that this jira is about setting up scope on a cluster wide basis. LDAP and Zookeeper could allow configs across clusters. This is something that gasp vms logicals got right IMO in that it is one interface to solve all of these problems. I think one giant key value store is a good first step, but realistically you need different permissions based on if you are making a change intra cluster, inter cluster, for one box, for one user or for one job. Being able to go back and see what the hierarchy of those values, and having them being centrally managed would be really neat. Just my two cents, I am just spoiled from my slow big machines. > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7135-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 13:36:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8637 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 13:36:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 13:36:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 5200 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 13:36:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5074 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 13:36:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4870 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 13:36:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:36:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1204.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:36:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A57B234C4BE for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <958823413.659461270215387238.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:36:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6672: ------------------------------ Attachment: BytesWritable.java.patch Patch attached. Transfer int to a four bytes buffer ints and use write(ints, 0, 4) to reduce invocation count of write. > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7133-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:01:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36017 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:01:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:01:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 15709 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 08:34:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15656 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 08:34:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15647 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 08:34:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:34:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:34:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458FA234C4C8 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2074106225.654861270197267284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:34:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4196) Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852751#action_12852751 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-4196: ----------------------------------- Xiao, you may create a sub-task from this jira that deals with the first optimization. The remaining optimizations are less obvious, and it would be useful to do some profiling after the first optimization is done. > Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4196 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.18.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > > There are several less performant implementation issues with the current Hadoop compression module. Generally, the opportunities all come from the fact that the granuarities of I/O operations from the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream are not controllable by the users, and thus users are forced to attach BufferedInputStream or BufferedOutputStream to both ends of the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream: > - ZlibCompressor: always returns false from needInput() after setInput(), and thus lead to a native call deflateBytesDirect() for almost every write() operation from CompressorStream(). This becomes problematic when applications call write() on the CompressorStream with small write sizes (e.g. one byte at a time). It is better to follow similar code path in LzoCompressor and append to internal uncompressed data buffer. > - CompressorStream: whenever the compressor produces some compressed data, it will directly issue write() calls to the down stream. Could be improved by keep appending to the byte[] until it is full (or half full) before writing to the down stream. Otherwise, applications have to use a BufferedOutputStream as the down stream in case the output sizes from CompressorStream is too small. This generally causes double buffering. > - BlockCompressorStream: similar issue as described above. > - BlockDecompressorStream: getCompressedData() reads only one compressed chunk at a time. Could be better to read a full buffer, and then obtain compressed chunk from buffer (similar to DecompressStream is doing, but admittedly a bit more complicated). > In generally, the following could be some guideline of Compressor/Decompressor and CompressorStream/DecompressorStream design/implementation that can give users some performance guarantee: > - Compressor and Decompressor keep two DirectByteBuffer, the size of which should be tuned to be optimal with regard to the specific compression/decompression algorithm. Ensure always call Compressor.compress() will a full (or near full) uncompressed data DirectBuffer. > - CompressorStream and DecompressorStream maintains a byte[] to read data from the down stream. The size of the byte[] should be user customizable (add a bufferSize parameter to CompressionCodec's createInputStream and createOutputStream interface). Ensure that I/O from the down stream at or near the granularity of the size of the byte[]. So applications can simply rely on the buffering inside CompressorStream and DecompressorStream (for the case of LZO: BlockCompressorStream and BlockDecompressorStream). > A more radical change would be to let the downward InputStream to directly deposit data to a ByteBuffer or the downard OutputStream to accept input data from ByteBuffer. We may call it ByteBufferInputStream and ByteBufferOutputStream. The CompressorStream and DecompressorStream may simply test whether the down stream indeed implements such interfaces and bypass its own byte[] buffer if true. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7136-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:06:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41283 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:06:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 38852 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:06:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38830 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:06:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38820 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 14:06:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:06:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1204.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:06:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60763234C4C6 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1586542796.659711270217187394.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:06:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6672: ------------------------------ Attachment: screenshot-2.jpg screenshot-2 after aplying the patch > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7134-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:08:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43180 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:08:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 64500 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 11:18:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63665 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 11:18:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63649 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 11:18:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:18:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1203.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:18:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B6F234C4CB for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1983161889.656501270207107526.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:18:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6640) FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block In-Reply-To: <1353980096.327641268867247264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852789#action_12852789 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6640: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #294 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/294/]) . FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block. Contributed by Hairong Kuang. > FileSystem.get() does RPC retries within a static synchronized block > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6640 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Environment: all > Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: getFS.patch > > > If using FileSystem.get() in a multithreaded environment, and one get() locks because the NN URI is too slow or not responding and retries are in progress, all other get() (for the diffferent users, NN) are blocked. > the synchronized block in in the static instance of Cache inner class. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7137-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:14:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48493 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:14:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 49474 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:14:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49427 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49419 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 14:14:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:14:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1204.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:14:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837A9234C4C6 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <857731477.659991270217667537.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:14:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852829#action_12852829 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6672: ----------------------------------- Compring two screenshots as following: 1. In screenshot-2 BytesWritable.write() spends more time on DataOutputStream.write() 2. In screenshot-1 BytesWritable.write() invoked 308k times in 10,780ms, whereas in screenshot-2 invoked 804k times in 11,010ms. So the time of a single invocation of BytesWritable.write() is reduced nearly 60%. > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7138-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:26:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56787 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 66840 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66807 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66799 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:26:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1204.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:26:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C39234C4C5 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <977451137.660411270218387227.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:26:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852833#action_12852833 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6672: ----------------------------------- Sun JDK's implementation of writeInt() writeLong() is not the same in class DataOutputStream. writeInt() wirtes one byte four times whereas wirteLong() writes a eight bytes buffer only one time. The underlying org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.write() spends too much time to get lock. So it's much efficient to implement writeInt() as writeLong() to decrease the invocation counts of MapOutputBuffer.write(). public final void writeInt(int v) throws IOException { out.write((v >>> 24) & 0xFF); out.write((v >>> 16) & 0xFF); out.write((v >>> 8) & 0xFF); out.write((v >>> 0) & 0xFF); incCount(4); } private byte writeBuffer[] = new byte[8]; public final void writeLong(long v) throws IOException { writeBuffer[0] = (byte)(v >>> 56); writeBuffer[1] = (byte)(v >>> 48); writeBuffer[2] = (byte)(v >>> 40); writeBuffer[3] = (byte)(v >>> 32); writeBuffer[4] = (byte)(v >>> 24); writeBuffer[5] = (byte)(v >>> 16); writeBuffer[6] = (byte)(v >>> 8); writeBuffer[7] = (byte)(v >>> 0); out.write(writeBuffer, 0, 8); incCount(8); } > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7132-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 14:30:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58819 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:30:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 96813 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 05:30:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96788 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 05:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96763 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 05:30:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:30:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1202.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:30:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6A7234C4D5 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <472358324.652881270186227906.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:30:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4196) Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852715#action_12852715 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-4196: ----------------------------------- Thanks Hong Tang for noticing duplication of another jira HADOOP-6662. Since the first performance enhancement suggestion is clear and easy to implement, maybe we can resolve it seperately. Close HADOOP-6662 and move the patch to this or dicuss in HADOOP-6662. > Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4196 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.18.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > > There are several less performant implementation issues with the current Hadoop compression module. Generally, the opportunities all come from the fact that the granuarities of I/O operations from the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream are not controllable by the users, and thus users are forced to attach BufferedInputStream or BufferedOutputStream to both ends of the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream: > - ZlibCompressor: always returns false from needInput() after setInput(), and thus lead to a native call deflateBytesDirect() for almost every write() operation from CompressorStream(). This becomes problematic when applications call write() on the CompressorStream with small write sizes (e.g. one byte at a time). It is better to follow similar code path in LzoCompressor and append to internal uncompressed data buffer. > - CompressorStream: whenever the compressor produces some compressed data, it will directly issue write() calls to the down stream. Could be improved by keep appending to the byte[] until it is full (or half full) before writing to the down stream. Otherwise, applications have to use a BufferedOutputStream as the down stream in case the output sizes from CompressorStream is too small. This generally causes double buffering. > - BlockCompressorStream: similar issue as described above. > - BlockDecompressorStream: getCompressedData() reads only one compressed chunk at a time. Could be better to read a full buffer, and then obtain compressed chunk from buffer (similar to DecompressStream is doing, but admittedly a bit more complicated). > In generally, the following could be some guideline of Compressor/Decompressor and CompressorStream/DecompressorStream design/implementation that can give users some performance guarantee: > - Compressor and Decompressor keep two DirectByteBuffer, the size of which should be tuned to be optimal with regard to the specific compression/decompression algorithm. Ensure always call Compressor.compress() will a full (or near full) uncompressed data DirectBuffer. > - CompressorStream and DecompressorStream maintains a byte[] to read data from the down stream. The size of the byte[] should be user customizable (add a bufferSize parameter to CompressionCodec's createInputStream and createOutputStream interface). Ensure that I/O from the down stream at or near the granularity of the size of the byte[]. So applications can simply rely on the buffering inside CompressorStream and DecompressorStream (for the case of LZO: BlockCompressorStream and BlockDecompressorStream). > A more radical change would be to let the downward InputStream to directly deposit data to a ByteBuffer or the downard OutputStream to accept input data from ByteBuffer. We may call it ByteBufferInputStream and ByteBufferOutputStream. The CompressorStream and DecompressorStream may simply test whether the down stream indeed implements such interfaces and bypass its own byte[] buffer if true. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7139-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 16:52:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3980 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 16:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 16:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34308 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 16:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34280 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 16:52:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34272 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 16:52:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:52:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1205.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:52:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68726234C4BE for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <108314726.661851270227147426.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852865#action_12852865 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6668: -------------------------------------- > I marked all of the serializer classes as public evolving in the patch. Great! It would be good if the evolving status was visible in javadoc, similar to deprecation. Should I file an issue for that? I'd be happy to help out with it, if you like. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7140-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 17:26:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11504 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 17:26:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 17:26:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 71388 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:26:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71352 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:26:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71343 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 17:26:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1205.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB69234C4C9 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1196091803.662411270229187702.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:26:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852876#action_12852876 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- The annotations do appear in javadoc, see http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/api/org/apache/hadoop/io/serializer/SerializationBase.html, for example. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7141-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 17:36:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13467 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 17:36:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 17:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 86514 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:36:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86379 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86363 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 17:36:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:36:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1206.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:36:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41834234C4C7 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2052319870.662641270229787267.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:36:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852883#action_12852883 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6668: -------------------------------------- > The annotations do appear in javadoc [ ... ] I think they should be more prominent, like deprecation. A bolded "Evolving" as the first word of the javadoc comment, that appears on the package summary page, like "Deprecated" would be ideal. We want folks to be very aware that these APIs may change, so that, when they do, they won't scream at us for breaking things. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7142-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 17:58:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17717 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 17:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 17:58:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11943 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11906 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 17:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11898 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 17:58:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1206.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:58:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBBD234C4C5 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1909424524.663221270231107571.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 17:58:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852892#action_12852892 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6672: ----------------------------------- Which version of hadoop did you use when you obtain the profiling data? In trunk, MapOUtputBuffer.Buffer.write(byte[], int, int) is not synchronized. > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7143-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 18:00:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18415 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 18:00:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 18:00:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16110 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16008 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16000 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 18:00:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:00:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:00:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2A1234C1EF for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <358839696.663261270231228114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:00:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6675) Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6675 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: documentation Reporter: Tom White It would be nice if we could mark Evolving (and Unstable) program elements in bold as the first word of the Javadoc comment (like "Deprecated"). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7144-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 18:02:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18822 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 18096 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18055 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18047 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:02:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:02:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C688234C4BE for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1959781876.663341270231347246.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:02:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852893#action_12852893 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- This is harder to achieve. The standard doclet is not every extensible, so we'd probably have to copy then modify it; see http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/faq/index.html#sourcedoclet. I've created HADOOP-6675 to track this. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7145-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 18:08:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20360 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 18:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 18:08:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 25955 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:08:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25918 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:08:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25910 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 18:08:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:08:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:08:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8A234C1EF for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1601380660.663491270231707182.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6676) Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6676 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6676 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Tom White Such a feature would be useful to enforce MAPREDUCE-1637. It might also be useful for users who wish to check their programs don't use Evolving APIs. It could be implemented using an annotation processor: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/javac.html#processing -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7146-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 18:26:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30096 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 18:26:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 18:26:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 44347 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:26:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44321 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 18:26:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44313 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 18:26:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:26:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:26:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5051D234C4D8 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1125956429.663861270232787328.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:26:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6382) publish hadoop jars to apache mvn repo. In-Reply-To: <1682027337.1258523559848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852900#action_12852900 ] Patrick Angeles commented on HADOOP-6382: ----------------------------------------- I'm curious if anyone's managed to deploy to the apache repo using HTTP. It says here that the wagon-http provider doesn't support deployment: http://maven.apache.org/wagon/wagon-providers/wagon-http/ > publish hadoop jars to apache mvn repo. > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6382 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6382 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: h20-v3tov5.patch, HADOOP-6382-findbugs.patch, HADOOP-6382-findbugs.patch, hadoop-6382-v1.patch, hadoop-6382-v2.patch, hadoop-6382-v3.patch, hadoop-6382-v4.patch, hadoop-6382-v5.patch, hadoop-6382.patch, HADOOP-6382.script.patch > > > use maven ant task to publish hadoop 20 jars to the apache maven repo -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7147-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 19:54:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49198 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 19:54:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 19:54:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 39686 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 19:54:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39656 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 19:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39648 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 19:54:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:54:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1207.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:54:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD98B234C4D5 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1283784957.665271270238067841.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:54:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6382) publish hadoop jars to apache mvn repo. In-Reply-To: <1682027337.1258523559848.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852935#action_12852935 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6382: -------------------------------------------- wagon plugin supports both http and https but we can only publish to the apache nexus repo using https. > publish hadoop jars to apache mvn repo. > --------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6382 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6382 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.20.3 > > Attachments: h20-v3tov5.patch, HADOOP-6382-findbugs.patch, HADOOP-6382-findbugs.patch, hadoop-6382-v1.patch, hadoop-6382-v2.patch, hadoop-6382-v3.patch, hadoop-6382-v4.patch, hadoop-6382-v5.patch, hadoop-6382.patch, HADOOP-6382.script.patch > > > use maven ant task to publish hadoop 20 jars to the apache maven repo -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7148-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 20:25:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53685 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 20:25:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 20:25:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 59280 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 20:25:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59244 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 20:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59224 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 20:25:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:25:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1207.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:25:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D63234C1EF for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:25:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alan Gates (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6677 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.21.0 Reporter: Alan Gates Priority: Minor Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7149-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 02 20:27:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53987 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 61225 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61140 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61132 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 20:27:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:27:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1207.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:27:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3A1234C4CB for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <945441826.665601270240048696.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "E. Sammer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852939#action_12852939 ] E. Sammer commented on HADOOP-6671: ----------------------------------- So much of the build system today "acts as" maven it might as well be maven. Having some consistency in the way the individual projects are built would be extremely nice. Maven is as painful as every other build tool we've seen but at least its pain comes in a consistent, known, quantity. The tooling support tends to be better due to the predictable nature of the the build process. The surrounding infrastructure (such as Hudson) is already mvn aware. The main problem with mvn tends to be errant dependencies in poms but this can be avoided (see the SpringSource Ivy / Maven repositories for an example of *very* well maintained metadata - http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/). +1 > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7150-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 00:14:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94794 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 71223 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71186 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71178 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:14:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:14:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE573234C1EF for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Propose some changes to FileContext ----------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6678 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: {code} FileContext fc = ..; if (fc.exists(path)) { if (fc.isFile(path)) { ... } else { ... } } {code} The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: {code} FileContext fc = ...; FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); if (fstatus.isFile() { ... } else { ... } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7151-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 00:20:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96127 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 78544 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:20:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78510 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:20:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78502 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 00:20:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:20:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1209.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:20:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE45F234C48C for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1285385225.668931270254027712.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853019#action_12853019 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- +1 HADOOP-6585 (Add FileStatus#isDirectory and isFile) (Replace usage of FileStatus#isDir()) > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7152-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 00:22:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96336 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 78932 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:22:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78897 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78888 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 00:22:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:22:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1209.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:22:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B05F234C4BE for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <275660690.669001270254147502.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:22:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853022#action_12853022 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Accidentally submitted the last comment.. +1 I cold do part 2 in lieu of HADOOP-6585 (Add FileStatus#isDirectory and isFile) and HDFS-995, MR-1535 (Replace usage of FileStatus#isDir()) which I just started working on today. Thanks, Eli > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7153-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 00:24:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97017 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:24:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 82047 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:24:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82018 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:24:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82010 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 00:24:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:24:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:24:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30BD234C4C5 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1854111176.669061270254267798.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:24:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853024#action_12853024 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- The other option for #2 is a stat cache, no? Of course we're trading off one set of problems for another, but I think for a lot of use cases a 3 second stat cache (a la linux nfs default) is totally reasonable, so long as it's easily disabled. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7154-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 00:48:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8899 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:48:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:48:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 95389 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95349 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 00:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95341 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 00:48:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1209.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:48:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735C1234C4C5 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <118906139.669551270255707471.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:48:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6539) Hadoop 20 Doc Backport In-Reply-To: <1135704534.52341265323767904.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Douglas updated HADOOP-6539: ---------------------------------- Attachment: C6539-2-y20s.patch > Hadoop 20 Doc Backport > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6539 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6539 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Assignee: Corinne Chandel > Attachments: C6539-1-y20.patch, C6539-2-y20.patch, C6539-2-y20s.patch, hadoop-6539-2.patch, HADOOP-6539-y20.patch, hadoop-logo-2.gif > > > Hadoop 20 Doc Backport > Updates to Hadoop 20 docs (internal). > After commit, docs should be reviewed. > (1) Delete these files > > hdfs_shell.xml > > hod_admin_guide.xml > > hod_config_guide.xml > > hod_user_guide.xml > > quickstart.xml > (2) Add these files > > file_system_shell.xml (replaces hdfs_shell.xml) > > hod_scheduler.xml (replaces/combines the 3 hod guides) > > single_node_setup.xml (replaces quickstart.xml) > (3) Add logo file > > hadoop-logo-2.gif > (4) Apply patch > > apply to Hadoop 20 (internal) - ALL files include edits (some minor, some major). > > DO NOT APPLY TO APACHE -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7155-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 15:03:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36520 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 15:03:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 15:03:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 49646 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 15:03:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49626 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 15:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49618 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 15:03:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:03:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:03:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A81F234C4C6 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1444792364.674481270307007566.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Francke (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853146#action_12853146 ] Lars Francke commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------- I don't have a lot of insight into the Hadoop Common project itself but I've done a lot of the work on the recent HBase transition together with Paul Smith and Kay Kay and would like to offer my help if needed. There are basically two ways to go: Either shuffle around a lot of directories to conform to the standard Maven layout or to override the Maven defaults and keep the current layout. Both ways are actually very painful but I prefer the first one. While that means a lot of work and a lot of swearing it also means that you'll get a consistent layout (with most other Maven projects) and the configuration is a lot easier. Some tools tend(ed) to not work properly with the non standard layout (strictly speaking this are bugs in the tools/plugins). You basically have to do a lot of work up front but after that it shouldn't be too hard to maintain. The directory moving/renaming unfortunately tends not to work too well with Subversion and branches (or I was doing it wrong) so I don't know how big the benefit would be to start a new one for doing this. What Paul Smith has done in HBASE-2099 is to provide a script that contained all the necessary commands (svn mv...) to finish the move (there are a couple more changes in other tickets) and a patch containing the .pom files. This has been much improved since and we've learned a lot from it. We are in fact still tweaking it and will change the pom structure once again to rely on the common Apache parent pom in addition to a few smaller fixes that are still outstanding. I'd propose a similar structure as HBase now has: A pom in the main directory with common information (packaging "pom") and then two modules ("core" and "contrib"). So the src/contrib directory would move to the top-level as would the docs directory (btw: I've never used Forrest with Maven but if Ant can do it Maven should be able to do it too). The final tarball as currently (trunk) created by ant tar should be easily reproducible by Maven (I couldn't find where most of the conribs ended up, are those currently missung from the .tar?) Paul Smith has indicated interest in this and I'd be interested and willing to help too if needed. But if you've already got someone to do the work I'm not going to complain :) It'd just be a shame to duplicate work here as the moving around of stuff in SVN is painful work if that's the way you decide to go. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7156-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 16:23:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43739 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 16:23:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 16:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 85927 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 16:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85870 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85862 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:23:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1212.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:23:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C111234C48D for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <794188356.674691270311807245.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Attachment: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch New patch attached, including test case. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7157-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 16:31:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44357 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 16:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 16:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 92049 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 16:31:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92026 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 16:31:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92012 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 16:31:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:31:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:31:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3685E234C4BE for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <404958215.674831270312287222.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:31:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853155#action_12853155 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6672: ----------------------------------- The profiling data is got from a internal version created from hadoop 0.19 trunk. MapOutputBuffer.Buffer.write(byte[], int, int) is also not a synchronized method in the profiling version. However, it trys to get a ReentrantLock(MapOUtputBuffer.Buffer.write(byte[], int, int)) before witting data to buffer and this is the performance issue. > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7158-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 03 20:19:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76100 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 20:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 20:19:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19039 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 20:19:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19009 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2010 20:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19001 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2010 20:19:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:19:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1212.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:19:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A28234C48D for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1386936572.676501270325967226.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 20:19:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853192#action_12853192 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------------- +1, I've seen this issue in production as well. Fix and test case look good, except please add the apache header to the test case, and preferably update the test case to JUnit 4 style > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7159-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 04 06:40:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46767 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2010 06:40:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Apr 2010 06:40:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 61927 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 06:40:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61360 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 06:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61087 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2010 06:40:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:40:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:40:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361D9234C48C for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 06:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <18346259.678881270363227220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 06:40:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "sam rash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6679) add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6679 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.20.0 Reporter: sam rash Priority: Minor transient DNS errors can cause the InetSocketAddress created in NetUtils.createSocketAddr() to be unresolved when the hostname is resolvable. Add a single retry after a short sleep using a simple InetSocketAddressFactory class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7160-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 04 06:46:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47246 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2010 06:46:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Apr 2010 06:46:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 62672 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 06:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62569 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 06:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62561 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2010 06:46:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:46:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:46:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD71234C1F2 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 06:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1008925993.678911270363587194.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 06:46:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "sam rash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6679) add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails In-Reply-To: <18346259.678881270363227220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sam rash updated HADOOP-6679: ----------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6679-patch-1.txt patch includes factory to create a resolved InetSocketAddress and updates NetUtil.createSocketAddr() to use it includes basic unit test > add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: sam rash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6679-patch-1.txt > > > transient DNS errors can cause the InetSocketAddress created in NetUtils.createSocketAddr() to be unresolved when the hostname is resolvable. Add a single retry after a short sleep using a simple InetSocketAddressFactory class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7161-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 04 16:53:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13436 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2010 16:53:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Apr 2010 16:53:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 71323 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 16:53:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71272 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2010 16:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71264 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2010 16:53:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:53:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1214.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:53:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3632C234C495 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1464787205.680851270400007221.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 16:53:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6672) BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) In-Reply-To: <603433340.633261270123587176.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853267#action_12853267 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6672: ----------------------------------- I see. This sounds like a duplicate of HADOOP-5664. Would you please profile trunk and confirm that the problem persists? > BytesWritable.write(buf) use much more CPU in writeInt() then write(buf) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6672 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BytesWritable.java.patch, screenshot-1.jpg, screenshot-2.jpg > > > BytesWritable.write() use nearly 4 times of CPU in wirteInt() as write buffer. It may be optimized. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7162-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 04:21:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12529 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 04:21:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 04:21:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 91136 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 04:21:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90642 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 04:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90627 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 04:21:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:21:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:21:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5E9234C48C for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 04:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1679478823.682611270441287832.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 04:21:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853300#action_12853300 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- +1 However, I wonder if we could go further and not list projects at all. It seems odd to mandate a pre-determined audience for a particular API. To me, it seems better to say "this is a developer-level interface" (stability is independent), which may be used by different projects. A Private API, by contrast, is one that may not be used outside the project. With this simplification, the LimitedPrivate annotation would be interpreted as being intended for developers rather than users of Hadoop. This would allow any project to use the API, including subprojects, contrib projects, or projects that are not a part of Hadoop. For example, by marking the MapReduce interfaces that schedulers need limited-private the scheduler implementations could be hosted anywhere - as contrib modules as they are today, or as an independent project - it shouldn't matter. Futhermore, by making the Java visibility public, the scheduler implementations would not have to be in the same package as the interfaces, as they are today. Users would not see these interfaces, since they are not in public javadoc. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Priority: Minor > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7163-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 14:43:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4325 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 14:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 14:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 4765 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:43:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4154 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:43:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4143 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 14:43:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:43:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1216.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:43:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCAD234C4AE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:43:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation ------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6680 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: contrib/cloud Reporter: Andrew Klochkov There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7164-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 14:47:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5963 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 14:47:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 9432 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9404 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9396 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:47:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1217.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:47:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52065234C48D for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <307203174.687841270478847334.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6680: ------------------------------------ Release Note: Fix "push" command in contrib/cloud scripts Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7165-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 14:47:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6011 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 9571 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9533 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9525 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:47:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:47:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555A8234C4A8 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <606454420.687861270478847348.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6680: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6680.patch > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7166-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 14:59:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8326 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 14:59:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15460 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15434 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15417 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:59:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:59:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CB0234C48D for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6681 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: contrib/cloud Reporter: Andrew Klochkov Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7167-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 14:59:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8384 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 14:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 15669 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15624 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15433 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 14:59:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:59:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:59:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491C3234C4AD for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <580154867.688141270479567298.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6681: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6681.patch > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7168-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 15:01:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13174 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 15:01:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 15:01:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 25133 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 15:01:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25088 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 15:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25044 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 15:01:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:01:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:01:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC88234C4AC for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <147317554.688201270479688186.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:01:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6681: ------------------------------------ Release Note: Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop EC2 instances Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7169-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 16:20:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33775 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 21770 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21732 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21724 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:20:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:20:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB810234C4AE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1098759203.690341270484427963.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7170-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 16:20:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33802 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 21904 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21860 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21775 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 16:20:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:20:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:20:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43BC234C4A8 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <827840899.690301270484427934.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:20:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6658.patch New patch which excludes annotations that are marked Private or LimitedPrivate. Also removes Javadoc and RAT warnings. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7171-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 16:30:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34937 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 16:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 16:30:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26192 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:30:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26162 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 16:30:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26154 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 16:30:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:30:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:30:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51570234C4B3 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <60952063.690571270485027332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:30:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6670) UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables In-Reply-To: <242202762.620161270078590059.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6670: ---------------------------------- Attachment: fs-close.patch This is the updated patch for y20. Not for inclusion. > UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: fs-close.patch, fs-close.patch, fs-close.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation objects are mutable, but they are used as keys in hash tables. This leads to serious problems in the FileSystem cache and RPC connection cache. We need to change the hashCode to be the identity hash code of the Subject and change equals to use == between the Subjects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7172-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 17:57:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54431 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 17:57:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 17:57:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 5126 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 17:57:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5096 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 17:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5088 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 17:57:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:57:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:57:52 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F12234C495 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1182425019.692791270490251285.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:57:31 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853465#action_12853465 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- We thought about client side stat cache too. Actually right before I filed the jira, we went through the two options one more time. Although I am excited about the cache solution, we feel that the proposed solution for #2 is less controversy, straightforward, and also exposes more information to for users to write more efficient code. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7173-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 18:01:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55796 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 9653 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9626 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9618 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:01:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1218.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:01:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154C0234C4AD for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 18:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <816889941.693011270490488086.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 18:01:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853468#action_12853468 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- OK, sounds good. Thanks for the info, Hairong. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7174-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 18:40:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69883 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 18:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 18:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 59231 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 18:40:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59163 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 18:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59155 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 18:40:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:40:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:40:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82565234C4B5 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 18:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2110561584.694021270492827532.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 18:40:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alan Gates (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853484#action_12853484 ] Alan Gates commented on HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------------ The thing I like about having a component name associated with the limited private interface is it tells developers who depends on that interface. So if they want to change it they know who to talk to. But I don't see it as critical. If others feel it's better removed, I'm ok with that. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Priority: Minor > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7175-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 19:40:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86547 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 43821 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43754 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43746 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1219.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AD8234C4AC for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <45301982.695231270496428350.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853503#action_12853503 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6680: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440756/HADOOP-6680.patch against trunk revision 930096. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/440/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/440/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/440/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/440/console This message is automatically generated. > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7176-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 19:42:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86805 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 19:42:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 44167 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44131 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44123 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:42:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:42:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDA5234C4AD for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1154910324.695301270496547916.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:42:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "lu cheng (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5881) Simplify configuration related to task-memory-monitoring and memory-based scheduling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853504#action_12853504 ] lu cheng commented on HADOOP-5881: ---------------------------------- Hi guys, If set mapred.cluster.max.map.memory.mb and mapred.cluster.max.reduce.memory.mb in the mapred-site.xml, for example, to be 3072, when I submit a grep job I get: 10/04/05 15:23:09 INFO mapred.FileInputFormat: Total input paths to process : 14 org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException: java.io.IOException: job_201004051501_0001(-1 memForMapTasks -1 memForReduceTasks): Invalid job requirements. at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.checkMemoryRequirements(JobTracker.java:3864) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.submitJob(JobTracker.java:3014) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Server.call(RPC.java:508) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:959) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler$1.run(Server.java:955) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:396) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Handler.run(Server.java:953) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client.call(Client.java:740) at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RPC$Invoker.invoke(RPC.java:220) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.$Proxy1.submitJob(Unknown Source) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJobInternal(JobClient.java:800) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.submitJob(JobClient.java:730) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobClient.runJob(JobClient.java:1249) at org.apache.hadoop.examples.Grep.run(Grep.java:69) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:65) at org.apache.hadoop.examples.Grep.main(Grep.java:93) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ProgramDriver$ProgramDescription.invoke(ProgramDriver.java:68) at org.apache.hadoop.util.ProgramDriver.driver(ProgramDriver.java:139) at org.apache.hadoop.examples.ExampleDriver.main(ExampleDriver.java:64) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.hadoop.util.RunJar.main(RunJar.java:156) Also, If you set mapred.cluster.map.memory.mb and mapred.cluster.reduce.memory.mb to be 512, the system always prompts you that : INFO mapred.JobClient: Task Id : attempt_201004051259_0001_r_000000_0, Status : FAILED TaskTree [pid=32315,tipID=attempt_201004051259_0001_r_000000_0] is running beyond memory-limits. Current usage : 556195840bytes. Limit : -1048576bytes. Killing task. The version I deploy is 0.20.2. It seems in some place the code use bytes, and in some place it uses MB. Can someone fix this problem? > Simplify configuration related to task-memory-monitoring and memory-based scheduling > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5881 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5881 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.20.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5881-20090526-branch-20.1.txt, HADOOP-5881-20090526.1.txt > > > The configuration we have now is pretty complicated. Besides everything else, the mechanism of not specifying parameters separately for maps and reduces leads to problems like HADOOP-5811. This JIRA should address simplifying things and at the same time solving these problems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7177-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 19:50:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87614 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 19:50:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 19:50:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 48338 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:50:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48313 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:50:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48305 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 19:50:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:50:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:50:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA51234C4A8 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1734716398.695431270497027443.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853507#action_12853507 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- Perhaps it could be optional - if no components are listed, then that means that any component may use it. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Priority: Minor > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7178-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 19:58:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89250 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 59045 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59022 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59014 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:58:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7340234C48D for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <914979899.695841270497507814.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:58:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853518#action_12853518 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6681: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440759/HADOOP-6681.patch against trunk revision 930096. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/441/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/441/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/441/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/441/console This message is automatically generated. > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7179-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 20:15:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96597 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 20:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 20:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 88487 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:15:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88456 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:15:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88448 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 20:15:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:15:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1220.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:15:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DADC234C4AC for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <298546830.696081270498527317.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:15:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853526#action_12853526 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440770/HADOOP-6658.patch against trunk revision 930096. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/442/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/442/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/442/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/442/console This message is automatically generated. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7180-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 20:28:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2397 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 20:28:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 20:28:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 8468 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:28:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8443 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 20:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8433 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 20:28:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:28:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:28:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ED8234C4C7 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1596794454.696661270499307883.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:28:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853532#action_12853532 ] Patrick Hunt commented on HADOOP-5670: -------------------------------------- Here's a really interesting paper from Akamai related to Quorum use for configuration: "ACMS: The Akamai Configuration Management System" http://www.usenix.org/event/nsdi05/tech/full_papers/sherman/sherman_html/index.html ZooKeeper has a REST based interface that might work well if client's (hadoop) primary interest is to poll for configuration during bootstrap. Not that one has to use REST, if the ZK client interface were used directly then one could register for dynamic changes via ZK watches. Additionally the hadoop nodes could take advantage of other ZK features to implement group membership,(nodes register themselves, and their state, with ZK, allowing simple monitoring to be implemented), Leader election, etc... > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7181-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 22:00:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27503 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 22:00:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 22:00:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24867 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 22:00:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24761 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 22:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24753 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 22:00:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:00:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1220.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:00:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B6B234C4AE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1580699864.697991270504827264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:00:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853558#action_12853558 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- > I cold do part 2 in lieu of HADOOP-6585 (Add FileStatus#isDirectory and isFile) and HDFS-995, MR-1535. Eli, thanks for volunteering to do part 2. Your help would be great! > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7182-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 05 23:54:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47015 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2010 23:54:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2010 23:54:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10788 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 23:54:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10750 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2010 23:54:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10742 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2010 23:54:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:54:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:54:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38960234C4A8 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1523422048.700531270511667229.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:54:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6682) NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6682 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Reporter: Jakob Homan public static String normalizeHostName(String name) { if (Character.digit(name.charAt(0), 16) != -1) { return name; This code is attempting to short-circuit the hostname->ip resolution on the assumption that if name starts with a digit, it's already an ip address. This is of questionable value, but because it checks for a hex digit, it will fail on names starting with [a-f]. Such names will not be converted to an ip address, but be returned unchanged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7183-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 01:20:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67887 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 01:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 01:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 58011 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:20:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57916 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:20:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57907 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 01:20:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:20:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1222.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:20:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217D8234C4B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1093171124.703071270516828136.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6421) Symbolic links In-Reply-To: <789869504.1260323298357.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853634#action_12853634 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6421: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #146 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/146/]) > Symbolic links > -------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6421 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: symlink-25-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink24-common.patch, symlink27-common.patch, symlink28-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink30-common.patch, symlink31-common.patch, symlink32-common.patch, symlink33-common.patch, symlink34-common.patch, symlink35-common.patch, symlink36-common.patch, symlink37-common.patch, symlink38-common.patch, symlink39-common.patch > > > Here's a jira for the common parts of HDFS-245, mostly changes to FileContext and AbstractFileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7184-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 01:21:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68579 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 01:21:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60725 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60686 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60655 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:21:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:21:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611E7234C4EF for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <324936148.704191270516830396.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6569) FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read In-Reply-To: <1333327371.313901266350847909.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853647#action_12853647 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6569: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #146 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/146/]) > FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6569 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: optimizeCat-yahoo.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo1.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo2.patch, optimizeCat.patch, optimizeCat.patch > > > Since FileSystem#open throws a FileNotFoundException when the file to be read does not exist, there is no need to check if the file is a directory or not before open. In case of HDFS, this could reduce one getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7185-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 01:21:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69512 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 01:21:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 62721 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62683 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62634 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 01:21:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:21:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:21:32 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DBE234C4D7 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <464878401.705251270516832158.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:20:32 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6579) A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. In-Reply-To: <843427920.414981266707188674.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853665#action_12853665 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6579: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #146 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h2.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/146/]) > A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6579 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: c-6579-hdfs.patch, c-6579-mr.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch > > > We need to include HDFS delegation tokens in the URLs while browsing the file system. Therefore, we need a url-safe way to encode and decode them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7186-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 01:56:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73709 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 01:56:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 01:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 87226 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:56:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87177 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87169 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 01:56:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:56:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1223.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:56:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B7F234C48D for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:56:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6683 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Components: io Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Xiao Kang Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7187-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 01:58:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73969 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 01:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 01:58:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 89028 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88993 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 01:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 88985 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 01:58:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1223.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:58:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4361A234C4AD for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <746365244.706581270519107275.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4196) Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853692#action_12853692 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-4196: ----------------------------------- Thank you. Sub task HADOOP-6683 created. > Possible performance enhancement in Hadoop compress module > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4196 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4196 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.18.0 > Reporter: Hong Tang > > There are several less performant implementation issues with the current Hadoop compression module. Generally, the opportunities all come from the fact that the granuarities of I/O operations from the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream are not controllable by the users, and thus users are forced to attach BufferedInputStream or BufferedOutputStream to both ends of the CompressionStream and DecompressionStream: > - ZlibCompressor: always returns false from needInput() after setInput(), and thus lead to a native call deflateBytesDirect() for almost every write() operation from CompressorStream(). This becomes problematic when applications call write() on the CompressorStream with small write sizes (e.g. one byte at a time). It is better to follow similar code path in LzoCompressor and append to internal uncompressed data buffer. > - CompressorStream: whenever the compressor produces some compressed data, it will directly issue write() calls to the down stream. Could be improved by keep appending to the byte[] until it is full (or half full) before writing to the down stream. Otherwise, applications have to use a BufferedOutputStream as the down stream in case the output sizes from CompressorStream is too small. This generally causes double buffering. > - BlockCompressorStream: similar issue as described above. > - BlockDecompressorStream: getCompressedData() reads only one compressed chunk at a time. Could be better to read a full buffer, and then obtain compressed chunk from buffer (similar to DecompressStream is doing, but admittedly a bit more complicated). > In generally, the following could be some guideline of Compressor/Decompressor and CompressorStream/DecompressorStream design/implementation that can give users some performance guarantee: > - Compressor and Decompressor keep two DirectByteBuffer, the size of which should be tuned to be optimal with regard to the specific compression/decompression algorithm. Ensure always call Compressor.compress() will a full (or near full) uncompressed data DirectBuffer. > - CompressorStream and DecompressorStream maintains a byte[] to read data from the down stream. The size of the byte[] should be user customizable (add a bufferSize parameter to CompressionCodec's createInputStream and createOutputStream interface). Ensure that I/O from the down stream at or near the granularity of the size of the byte[]. So applications can simply rely on the buffering inside CompressorStream and DecompressorStream (for the case of LZO: BlockCompressorStream and BlockDecompressorStream). > A more radical change would be to let the downward InputStream to directly deposit data to a ByteBuffer or the downard OutputStream to accept input data from ByteBuffer. We may call it ByteBufferInputStream and ByteBufferOutputStream. The CompressorStream and DecompressorStream may simply test whether the down stream indeed implements such interfaces and bypass its own byte[] buffer if true. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7188-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:12:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76034 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 97728 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97636 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97628 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1223.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:12:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97686234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1588736317.706971270519954619.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:12:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6683: ------------------------------ Attachment: ZlibCompressor.java.patch Patch attached. > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7189-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:12:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76125 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:12:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 97867 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97824 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97816 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:12:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:12:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:12:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29CD234C4B2 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1874355203.707041270519954992.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:12:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6662) hadoop zlib compression does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <814636202.542801269849567653.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6662: ------------------------------ Resolution: Duplicate Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Duplicated with HADOOP-6683. > hadoop zlib compression does not fully utilize the buffer > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6662 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6662 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.patch > > > org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.ZlibCompressonr does not fully utilize its buffer. > Its needesInput() return false when there is any data in its buffer (64K by default). The performance will greately degrade since an JNI call will be invoded at each time the write() method of CompressonStream is called. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7190-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 02:28:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77808 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 02:28:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 02:28:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 8210 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:28:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8186 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 02:28:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8178 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 02:28:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:28:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1223.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:28:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B9F234C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1692488264.707211270520907264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:28:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Attachment: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch Thank you for your advice. New patch attached with apache header and JUnit 4 style test case. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7191-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 03:32:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85731 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 03:32:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 03:32:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 46513 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 03:32:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46402 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 03:32:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46394 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 03:32:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:32:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:32:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C3A234C4B2 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 03:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <763120834.708171270524747338.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 03:32:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5881) Simplify configuration related to task-memory-monitoring and memory-based scheduling MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853717#action_12853717 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-5881: ----------------------------------- Are you using *all* the configuration items properly as documented [here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5881?focusedCommentId=12712919&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12712919] ? You should be setting all of them with appropriate values. The first error you mentioned seems to happening because you only configured the max limits but not the cluster wide slot size and the per-job configuration. No idea about the second problem. If you give more details, we can see. We have been using this feature with the mentioned configuration items so far without any issues, so I don't think there is any problem of using bytes vs MB at all. > Simplify configuration related to task-memory-monitoring and memory-based scheduling > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-5881 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5881 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.20.1 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5881-20090526-branch-20.1.txt, HADOOP-5881-20090526.1.txt > > > The configuration we have now is pretty complicated. Besides everything else, the mechanism of not specifying parameters separately for maps and reduces leads to problems like HADOOP-5811. This JIRA should address simplifying things and at the same time solving these problems. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7192-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 04:42:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93176 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 04:42:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 04:42:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 87298 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 04:42:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87213 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 04:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87205 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 04:42:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:42:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1224.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:42:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1E3234C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2087770439.709191270528947376.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:42:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6682) NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly In-Reply-To: <1523422048.700531270511667229.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853739#action_12853739 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6682: ----------------------------------- Similar issue came up in MAPREDUCE-1222. The following code might be useful: {noformat} + static Pattern IP_PATTERN; + + static { + // 0-255 + String IPV4BK1 = "(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)"; + // .b.c.d - where b/c/d are 0-255, and optionally adding two more + // backslashes before each period + String IPV4BKN = "(?:\\\\?\\." + IPV4BK1 + "){3}"; + String IPV4_PATTERN = IPV4BK1 + IPV4BKN; + + // first hexadecimal number + String IPV6BK1 = "(?:[0-9a-fA-F]{1,4})"; + // remaining 7 hexadecimal numbers, each preceded with ":". + String IPV6BKN = "(?::" + IPV6BK1 + "){7}"; + String IPV6_PATTERN = IPV6BK1 + IPV6BKN; + + IP_PATTERN = Pattern.compile( + "^(?:" + IPV4_PATTERN + "|" + IPV6_PATTERN + ")$"); + } + + + static boolean isIPAddress(String hostname) { + return IP_PATTERN.matcher(hostname).matches(); + } {noformat} > NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Jakob Homan > > public static String normalizeHostName(String name) { > if (Character.digit(name.charAt(0), 16) != -1) { > return name; > This code is attempting to short-circuit the hostname->ip resolution on the assumption that if name starts with a digit, it's already an ip address. This is of questionable value, but because it checks for a hex digit, it will fail on names starting with [a-f]. Such names will not be converted to an ip address, but be returned unchanged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7193-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 04:44:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93442 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 04:44:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 04:44:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 87664 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 04:44:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87641 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 04:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87633 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 04:44:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:44:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1224.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:44:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC7B234C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <581308153.709241270529067313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:44:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6682) NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly In-Reply-To: <1523422048.700531270511667229.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853740#action_12853740 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6682: ----------------------------------- The regex IPV4BKN needs some change because in job history dots (.) are escaped with double backslashes. > NetUtils:normalizeHostName does not process hostnames starting with [a-f] correctly > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6682 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6682 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Jakob Homan > > public static String normalizeHostName(String name) { > if (Character.digit(name.charAt(0), 16) != -1) { > return name; > This code is attempting to short-circuit the hostname->ip resolution on the assumption that if name starts with a digit, it's already an ip address. This is of questionable value, but because it checks for a hex digit, it will fail on names starting with [a-f]. Such names will not be converted to an ip address, but be returned unchanged. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7194-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 08:25:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35024 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 08:25:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 08:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 44282 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 08:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44181 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 08:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44171 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1225.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:25:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223BD234C4CC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1387308538.3001270542334139.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:25:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrey Kuzmin (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853801#action_12853801 ] Andrey Kuzmin commented on HADOOP-5670: --------------------------------------- > nodes register themselves, and their state, with ZK, allowing simple monitoring to be implemented I would add (dynamic) membership-aware scheduling. It's typically far from straightforward for a scheduler to account for nodes (re)joining group unless there is an explicit group registration mechanism, with join/leave events dispatched to scheduler and other interested parties. > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7195-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 10:50:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63112 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 10:50:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 74561 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74403 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74071 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 10:49:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:49:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:49:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E54234C4B5 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1448622083.5321270550974490.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6421) Symbolic links In-Reply-To: <789869504.1260323298357.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853849#action_12853849 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6421: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #302 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/302/]) > Symbolic links > -------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6421 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: symlink-25-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink24-common.patch, symlink27-common.patch, symlink28-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink30-common.patch, symlink31-common.patch, symlink32-common.patch, symlink33-common.patch, symlink34-common.patch, symlink35-common.patch, symlink36-common.patch, symlink37-common.patch, symlink38-common.patch, symlink39-common.patch > > > Here's a jira for the common parts of HDFS-245, mostly changes to FileContext and AbstractFileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7196-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 10:50:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63455 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 10:50:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 75262 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75093 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74987 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:50:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1226.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:50:17 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE89D29A0013 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <213853279.6291270550975976.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6569) FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read In-Reply-To: <1333327371.313901266350847909.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853859#action_12853859 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6569: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #302 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/302/]) > FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6569 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: optimizeCat-yahoo.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo1.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo2.patch, optimizeCat.patch, optimizeCat.patch > > > Since FileSystem#open throws a FileNotFoundException when the file to be read does not exist, there is no need to check if the file is a directory or not before open. In case of HDFS, this could reduce one getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7197-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 10:50:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63850 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 10:50:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 76165 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76122 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76090 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 10:50:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:50:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1227.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:50:37 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E58129A002D for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1949404944.7151270550977647.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:49:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6579) A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. In-Reply-To: <843427920.414981266707188674.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853874#action_12853874 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6579: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net #302 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/302/]) > A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6579 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: c-6579-hdfs.patch, c-6579-mr.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch > > > We need to include HDFS delegation tokens in the URLs while browsing the file system. Therefore, we need a url-safe way to encode and decode them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7198-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 13:18:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6435 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 13:18:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 13:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 30624 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:18:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30469 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:18:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30100 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 13:18:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:18:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1228.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:18:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EDA234C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1258928011.9761270559913559.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:18:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6679) add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails In-Reply-To: <18346259.678881270363227220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853925#action_12853925 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6679: ---------------------------------------- # This is a git patch, not something hudson will handle, try --no-prefix, I think. # What JVM options are you running to disable DNS caching, both successful and unsuccessful. Without that, retry in code may not be useful. # If we are changing how ports are opened, I'd quite like to see a string parameter saying what the port is to be used for, perhaps with some logging. Sometimes it can be tricky trying to find out why some apparenlty random port is open, and if it was all logged (at -debug, with a stack trace), some things may be easier to deal with. > add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: sam rash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6679-patch-1.txt > > > transient DNS errors can cause the InetSocketAddress created in NetUtils.createSocketAddr() to be unresolved when the hostname is resolvable. Add a single retry after a short sleep using a simple InetSocketAddressFactory class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7199-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 13:46:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13228 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 63669 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63459 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63354 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 13:46:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:46:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1228.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:46:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863EE234C4B2 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1775798644.10141270561594548.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6421) Symbolic links In-Reply-To: <789869504.1260323298357.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853933#action_12853933 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6421: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #275 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/275/]) > Symbolic links > -------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6421 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6421 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: symlink-25-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink-26-common.patch, symlink24-common.patch, symlink27-common.patch, symlink28-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink29-common.patch, symlink30-common.patch, symlink31-common.patch, symlink32-common.patch, symlink33-common.patch, symlink34-common.patch, symlink35-common.patch, symlink36-common.patch, symlink37-common.patch, symlink38-common.patch, symlink39-common.patch > > > Here's a jira for the common parts of HDFS-245, mostly changes to FileContext and AbstractFileSystem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7200-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 13:47:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13871 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 65429 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65327 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65310 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:47:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:47:17 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800FD234C4CB for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <812155180.11261270561596523.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6569) FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read In-Reply-To: <1333327371.313901266350847909.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853946#action_12853946 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6569: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #275 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/275/]) > FsShell#cat should avoid calling unecessary getFileStatus before opening a file to read > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6569 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6569 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: optimizeCat-yahoo.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo1.patch, optimizeCat-yahoo2.patch, optimizeCat.patch, optimizeCat.patch > > > Since FileSystem#open throws a FileNotFoundException when the file to be read does not exist, there is no need to check if the file is a directory or not before open. In case of HDFS, this could reduce one getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7201-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 13:47:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14948 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 13:47:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 67761 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67669 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67594 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 13:47:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:47:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:47:39 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8646234C51F for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <404607948.12471270561598820.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:46:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6579) A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. In-Reply-To: <843427920.414981266707188674.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853966#action_12853966 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6579: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #275 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/275/]) > A utility for reading and writing tokens into a URL safe string. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6579 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6579 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: c-6579-hdfs.patch, c-6579-mr.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch, c-6579.patch > > > We need to include HDFS delegation tokens in the URLs while browsing the file system. Therefore, we need a url-safe way to encode and decode them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7202-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 13:56:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18671 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 13:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 13:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 80757 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:56:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80709 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 13:56:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80701 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 13:56:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:56:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1229.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:56:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD842234C4AB for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1339639092.13171270562193709.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:56:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6663: ------------------------------ Release Note: Fix EOF exception in BlockDecompressorStream when decompressing previous compressed empty file Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7203-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 14:21:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24933 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 14:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 14:21:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 14489 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:21:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14428 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 14:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14268 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 14:21:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:21:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:21:01 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD67234C1F2 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <919316322.13621270563640510.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:20:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6663) BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file In-Reply-To: <1619883340.543171269850767204.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853991#action_12853991 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6663: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440828/BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch against trunk revision 930096. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/443/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/443/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/443/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/443/console This message is automatically generated. > BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception when decompressing the file compressed from empty file > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6663 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6663 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.java.patch, BlockDecompressorStream.patch > > > An empty file can be compressed using BlockDecompressorStream, which is for block-based compressiong algorithm such as LZO. However, when decompressing the compressed file, BlockDecompressorStream get EOF exception. > Here is a typical exception stack: > java.io.EOFException > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.rawReadInt(BlockDecompressorStream.java:125) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.getCompressedData(BlockDecompressorStream.java:96) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.BlockDecompressorStream.decompress(BlockDecompressorStream.java:82) > at org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.DecompressorStream.read(DecompressorStream.java:74) > at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:85) > at org.apache.hadoop.util.LineReader.readLine(LineReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:134) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.LineRecordReader.next(LineRecordReader.java:39) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.moveToNext(MapTask.java:186) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$TrackedRecordReader.next(MapTask.java:170) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapRunner.run(MapRunner.java:48) > at org.apache.hadoop.streaming.PipeMapRunner.run(PipeMapRunner.java:18) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:196) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7204-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 15:41:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45405 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 15:41:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 15:41:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 67219 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 15:41:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67145 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 15:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67099 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 15:41:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:41:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1230.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:41:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C15234C4C9 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1658399483.16001270568493944.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:41:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854023#action_12854023 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------------ Considering that the task tracker talks to the job tracker (where the scheduler runs), the dynamic add/join is already there. I want to re-iterate something here: Think about the client, not just the server! Chances are good the clients are NOT owned by the same entity that runs the Hadoop grid. Building something that is strictly usable by the server is not going to be that much in terms of bang-for-the-buck, considering any reasonable configuration management tool could do that. ... and given the various private convos I've had about this, I'm still not convinced ZK is a reasonable answer. Sure you can probably do more with it, but that comes at a cost, especially on the operations side where there is (highly likely) already a DS in place. It just isn't practical to require ZK for this. > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7205-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 16:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52178 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 16:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 16:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11540 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:01:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11510 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11502 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 16:01:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:01:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:01:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467CC234C4CD for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1562177850.16741270569694287.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854033#action_12854033 ] Patrick Hunt commented on HADOOP-5670: -------------------------------------- Allen and I had a conversation about this a while ago and he made some very good points for storing certain data in a DS vs ZK. In particular user data makes alot of sense imo to be stored in DS. Data. Keep in mind that ZK is all about coordination, not "data storage". We don't support search for example, which is a significant feature in most DSs. Also integration with legacy systems (your existing user database) is also a feature of most DSs that ZK does not have. While ZK could do these things, a typical DS will do them for you out of the box, and make your admin's lives easier in the sense that they already have experience with this. At the same time things like coordination are best served by ZK. Keeping track of which nodes are allocated to which functions, the status of processes and coordinating operations between them, the load and activity of processes (nodes), Leader election within a highly reliable/available service, distributed locks and work queues, etc... Take a look at LinkedIn's Norbert for an example of one instantiation of something like this: http://bit.ly/6OQhwe > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7206-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 16:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57727 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 38031 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37986 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37978 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 16:31:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:31:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1230.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:31:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D97234C4CB for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1301946846.17801270571495473.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Newman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854046#action_12854046 ] Alex Newman commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------- So I think their exists a couple of different conversations going on here. I suppose if all we wish is to replace basically the -D options passed into hadoop, then I am very openminded to a ldap based scheme as a plugin. I would be very happy if it included some scoping so that configuration could be provided on a intra cluster, inter cluster, host ,user or job level. Guidelines should be provided as how not to disrupt existing ldap users. However their exists numerous other things which fall into the cluster configuration in which ldap may not be the best choice. In regards to operations, I think deployment complexity is an argument against ldap. Even if an organization were willing to store such configuration in their existing ldap infrastructure, which I am skeptical of in many cases, it would require organizations not using ldap to run additional infrastructure to solve a problem which could be solved by something already provided by the hadoop infrastructure. I would feel as though if we saw many users deploying a isolated ldap installation just for hadoop that we would have made people's life harder not easier. Allen, sorry to be a pain , but could you be a bit more pedantic about what you mean by configurations ? Do you think a hybrid system may make sense here? > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7207-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 16:49:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 60575 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 16:49:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 16:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 53812 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:49:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53706 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 16:49:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53698 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 16:49:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:49:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:49:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F40234C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1513256943.18131270572573498.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:49:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854054#action_12854054 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6683: ------------------------------------- Hi Xiao, Do you have any benchmarks on this? Would be interesting to see. -Todd > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7208-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 17:07:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68010 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 17:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 17:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 82832 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:07:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82801 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82793 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 17:07:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:07:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1230.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:07:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1FA234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <595744630.18631270573654175.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6680: ------------------------------ Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Assignee: Andrew Klochkov Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this. Thanks Andrew! > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7209-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 17:15:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70318 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 17:15:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 17:15:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 92443 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:15:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92405 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:15:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92397 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 17:15:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:15:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1230.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:15:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C52234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1865717367.18751270574134071.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:15:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6684) Create a wrapper for TFile that handles generic serialization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Create a wrapper for TFile that handles generic serialization ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6684 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6684 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley It would be good to have an OFile class that reads and writes serialized objects from TFiles. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7210-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 17:21:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71718 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 17:21:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 17:21:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 99461 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:21:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99424 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:21:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99416 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 17:21:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:21:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1231.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:21:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEEB234C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1988527879.18861270574493519.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:21:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854072#action_12854072 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6680: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #214 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/214/]) . hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation. Contributed by Andrew Klochkov. > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7211-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 17:25:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73078 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 17:25:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 17:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 4921 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:25:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4862 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4617 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 17:25:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:25:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:25:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A195234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <328977938.18921270574733630.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:25:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6685) Change the generic serialization framework API to use serialization-specific bytes instead of Map for configuration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Change the generic serialization framework API to use serialization-specific bytes instead of Map for configuration ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6685 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley Currently, the generic serialization framework uses Map for the serialization specific configuration. Since this data is really internal to the specific serialization, I think we should change it to be an opaque binary blob. This will simplify the interface for defining specific serializations for different contexts (MAPREDUCE-1462). It will also move us toward having serialized objects for Mappers, Reducers, etc (MAPREDUCE-1183). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7212-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 17:53:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80360 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 17:53:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 17:53:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 59088 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:53:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59060 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 17:53:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59052 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 17:53:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1231.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:53:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE46234C4D8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1371339222.19951270576414912.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:53:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854083#action_12854083 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------------ bq. it would require organizations not using ldap to run additional infrastructure to solve a problem which could be solved by something already provided by the hadoop infrastructure. I would feel as though if we saw many users deploying a isolated ldap installation just for hadoop that we would have made people's life harder not easier. If you s,LDAP,ZK,g above, you'll find it is a better fit. The cold, hard reality is that LDAP is everywhere, ZK is not. There are some key features in ZK that are/were missing in order for it to fit here (with the good news being that those gaps are slowly closing). But the truth of the matter is that LDAP is a well understood technology by most IT departments and ZK is not. (Sidenote: it would be interesting to know how well used the security components of ZK are...) Also, I don't think you should think of ZK as part of the Hadoop infrastructure. It is a sub project (and therefore part of the ecosystem), but you can run Hadoop without using ZK and many many many people do, including Yahoo! for years. bq. Allen, sorry to be a pain , but could you be a bit more pedantic about what you mean by configurations ? Do you think a hybrid system may make sense here? I'll try and write/diagram something up with a concrete proposal as to how I think this should be done, based on conversations I've had with Owen and others over the years. You'll find I'm thinking way beyond just a simple 10 node grid. :) > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7213-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:15:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85304 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 85884 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:15:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85821 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85673 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:15:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:15:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:15:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE67C234C4B9 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1957316386.20691270577733713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:15:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854098#action_12854098 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6681: ----------------------------------- Passing these credentials automatically may not be what the user wants, and may in fact be a security liability (since the credentials are passed to the cluster, which may be shared with other users). You can achieve the same result explicitly with the following command line arguments: {code} --env AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID \ --env AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY {code} Does this solve your issue? > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7214-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:19:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86235 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:19:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 93612 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93577 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93560 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:19:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1231.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:19:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F673234C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <592319741.20791270577973520.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:19:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854100#action_12854100 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- Test failures are unrelated. I think this is ready to be committed. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7215-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:19:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86309 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 93982 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93942 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93934 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:19:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:19:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:19:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A16D234C4B3 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1188523401.20861270577973564.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:19:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "sam rash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6679) add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails In-Reply-To: <18346259.678881270363227220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854102#action_12854102 ] sam rash commented on HADOOP-6679: ---------------------------------- 1. ah yes, I see the --no-prefix option. I'll update and post the patch 2. my understanding is the jvm caches on successful resolution, not on failure, so a retry should be useful http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/net/properties.html#nct Do I misunderstand the docs? 3. you mean you want a port/service description passed in here? public static InetSocketAddress createWithResolveRetry( String hostname, int port, String portDescription ) { .... and I assume the NetUtils.createSocketAddr() would now have to take this? It's current signature is public static InetSocketAddress createSocketAddr(String target, int defaultPort) { can you clarify what you mean by this? > add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: sam rash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6679-patch-1.txt > > > transient DNS errors can cause the InetSocketAddress created in NetUtils.createSocketAddr() to be unresolved when the hostname is resolvable. Add a single retry after a short sleep using a simple InetSocketAddressFactory class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7216-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:24:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87205 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:24:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 97673 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:24:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97646 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97638 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:24:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:24:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:23:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0BA234C4D0 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <297419593.21351270578216060.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:23:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Newman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854105#action_12854105 ] Alex Newman commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------- Allen, A more concrete proposal would be great, I am just trying to understand which part of the problem we are trying to solve. It's good to see people putting some real elbow great in making hadoop more palatable to ops/system as they are a very important stakeholder. I do think that requiring sysadmins to understand the details of zk, just to do configuration stuff would be kindof a show stopper for acceptance. Also having cluster and host wide information in ldap definitely seems like a win in the portability department. The only real worry is that we end up increasing the deployment complexity or develope things in such a way that people have to deploy an array of ldap servers within each cluster. Considering I have never worked at any large enterprise which uses directory services besides notes or active directory, I think that this could seriously be a burden if we do it wrong. > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7217-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:25:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87886 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 1564 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1523 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1515 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:25:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:25:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1231.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:25:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99C0234C4AC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <556437840.21421270578333890.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:25:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "sam rash (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6679) add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails In-Reply-To: <18346259.678881270363227220.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sam rash updated HADOOP-6679: ----------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6679-patch-2.txt this patch applies when i run patch -p0 < HADOOP-6679-patch-2.txt from the root of a hadoop checkout please advise if I need to generate it in some other way > add retry logic to NetUtils.createSocketAddr() when hostname resolution fails > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6679 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6679 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: sam rash > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6679-patch-1.txt, HADOOP-6679-patch-2.txt > > > transient DNS errors can cause the InetSocketAddress created in NetUtils.createSocketAddr() to be unresolved when the hostname is resolvable. Add a single retry after a short sleep using a simple InetSocketAddressFactory class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7218-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:29:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94571 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:29:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:29:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3818 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:29:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3712 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:29:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3704 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:29:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:29:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:29:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AA9234C4CC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <343130937.21811270578573882.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:29:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Patrick Hunt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854108#action_12854108 ] Patrick Hunt commented on HADOOP-5670: -------------------------------------- bq. would be interesting to know how well used the security components of ZK are ZK has plugable auth with acls on the znodes. Yahoo uses this internally for multi-tenant ZK clusters, the auth in this case is Yahoo specific implementation (uses certificates). We have met with the Yahoo Hadoop Security team, we don't have a kerberos plugin for ZK auth yet but we have discussed it. bq. you can run Hadoop without using ZK that's true for MR/HDFS today, it may not be so in future. HBase requires ZK today, so if you're using HBase you're already using ZK. ;-) bq. LDAP is a well understood technology by most IT departments and ZK is not I agree with this, in general most IT departments are going to be much more familiar with technologies such as LDAP, MySQL, Exchange, etc... that have been around for a while. This is a big plus. ZK is still very new relative to these mature technologies. (although the same could be said for Hadoop itself). > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7219-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 18:55:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 189 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 18:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 18:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 26093 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26064 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 18:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26056 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 18:55:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:55:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:55:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9B7234C4CC for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <37723026.22931270580133980.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854121#action_12854121 ] Mahadev konar commented on HADOOP-5670: --------------------------------------- Just my thought - I think ZooKeeper might become a part of Hadoop Deployment in somewhere near term (for High Availability) or some other part of Hadoop. With HBase already deploying ZooKeeper as part of there stack, it might need a little more thinking in just outrightly rejecting the idea of ZooKeeper because of unfamiliarity to ops. > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7220-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 19:05:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2858 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 19:05:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 19:05:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 34467 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 19:05:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34430 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 19:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34418 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 19:05:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:05:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1232.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:05:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D869234C4CA for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1562551390.23411270580734316.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Alex Newman (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5670) Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854125#action_12854125 ] Alex Newman commented on HADOOP-5670: ------------------------------------- I would say it this way: - What's the right fit - What role could ldap play - What are the specific goals we are trying to solve - How do we make ops/syseng guys comfortable with our decisions. - How do we reduce operational complexity - How do we reduce deployment complexity > Hadoop configurations should be read from a distributed system > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > > Rather than distributing the hadoop configuration files to every data node, compute node, etc, Hadoop should be able to read configuration information (dynamically!) from LDAP, ZooKeeper, whatever. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7221-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 21:53:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37974 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 21:53:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 21:53:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 39275 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 21:53:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39244 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 21:53:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39236 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 21:53:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:53:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1233.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:53:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF02234C4AF for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <214074546.27691270590813588.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:53:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "David Ciemiewicz (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6335) Support reading of concatenated gzip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: <557853755.1256648579470.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Ciemiewicz updated HADOOP-6335: ------------------------------------- Summary: Support reading of concatenated gzip and bzip2 files (was: Support reading of concatenated gzip files) bzip2 also supports concatenation of individually compressed files. bzcat has absolutely no problem reading all of the data in a single concatenated file. Unfortuantely, M/R loses records. My Hadoop Streaming and Pig jobs saw only 2% of the data in the concatenated file. That's a 98% data loss. Not very good. There should be no data loss in reading these concatenated files. > Support reading of concatenated gzip and bzip2 files > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6335 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6335 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > GzipCodec.GzipInputStream needs to support reading of concatenated gzip files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7222-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40195 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:03:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:03:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 50901 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:03:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50873 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50865 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:03:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:03:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:03:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ABB234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:03:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6686 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.22.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7223-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:07:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41621 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 54819 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54789 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54781 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:07:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:07:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796FA234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <825076237.27831270591653496.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:07:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854217#action_12854217 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------------- RPC server sends exception class name and printed stack trace in response. Proposed change: # if the exception is unwrapped, with the message set to the first line of printed stack trace from response. The message is ": " #* While unwrapping, I propose removing the redundant ": " from the message. Other than HDFSCli test I cannot think of a reason why an application depends on the error string to include exception name, especially given that the exception type that is thrown has that information already. #. if the exception is not unwrapped, RemoteException is thrown as it is, with printed stack trace as the message. #* This behavior will be retained. The exception name here along with the stack trace (albeit the server side) is useful for debugging. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7224-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:13:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42393 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:13:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:13:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 61383 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:13:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61328 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61319 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:13:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:13:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:13:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46E3234C48D for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1945721081.27911270592015868.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:13:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6686.patch > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7225-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:17:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43032 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:17:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:17:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 66179 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:17:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66126 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:17:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65877 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:17:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:17:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1233.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:17:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517F9234C48C for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <191053771.27981270592254332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:17:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6687) user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6687 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey In case of a relogin, a new user object is created in the subject. This causes the subject to lose some state for example authentication method. Instead, a new user object should not be added to the subject if one is already present. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7226-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:18:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43263 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:18:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:18:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 67453 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:18:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67405 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67397 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:18:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:18:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:18:16 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FE5234C4B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1569201423.28091270592254433.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:17:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6675) Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc In-Reply-To: <358839696.663261270231228114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854221#action_12854221 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6675: ----------------------------------- I'm not sure we can use an annotation processor for this, since (by my reading) they process annotations that appear in the source being compiled, rather than annotations that are _referenced_ by the source being compiled. Anyone got any suggestions for how this might be implemented? > Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6675 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > > It would be nice if we could mark Evolving (and Unstable) program elements in bold as the first word of the Javadoc comment (like "Deprecated"). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7227-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:23:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44329 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 77120 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77085 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77077 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:23:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1233.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:23:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91184234C4AF for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <897635840.28251270592613592.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:23:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6676) Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs In-Reply-To: <1601380660.663491270231707182.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854224#action_12854224 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6676: ----------------------------------- I'm not sure we can use an annotation processor for this, since (by my reading) they process annotations that appear in the source being compiled, rather than annotations that are _referenced_ by the source being compiled. Anyone got any suggestions for how this might be implemented? > Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6676 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6676 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tom White > > Such a feature would be useful to enforce MAPREDUCE-1637. It might also be useful for users who wish to check their programs don't use Evolving APIs. > It could be implemented using an annotation processor: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/javac.html#processing -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7228-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 22:23:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44416 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 22:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 77314 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77250 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77218 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 22:23:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:23:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:23:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B8234C4B3 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1273818309.28281270592613619.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:23:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6675) Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc In-Reply-To: <358839696.663261270231228114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6675: ------------------------------ Comment: was deleted (was: I'm not sure we can use an annotation processor for this, since (by my reading) they process annotations that appear in the source being compiled, rather than annotations that are _referenced_ by the source being compiled. Anyone got any suggestions for how this might be implemented? ) > Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6675 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > > It would be nice if we could mark Evolving (and Unstable) program elements in bold as the first word of the Javadoc comment (like "Deprecated"). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7229-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 23:16:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53758 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 36512 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36456 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36442 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 23:16:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:16:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1234.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:16:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E676B234C4AD for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1415657441.29551270595793943.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:16:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854243#action_12854243 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6658: -------------------------------------- +1 Looks good to me. I also saw that you okayed this use of LGPL'd JDiff on legal-discuss@. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7230-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 06 23:24:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56123 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2010 23:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2010 23:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 43847 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 23:24:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43812 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2010 23:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43791 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2010 23:24:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:24:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1234.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:24:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F043234C4A8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <198668007.29941270596273650.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:24:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854248#action_12854248 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- Yes, here's the relevant [thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201004.mbox/] > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7231-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 00:34:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73781 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 00:34:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 00:34:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 90605 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 00:34:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90580 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 00:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90572 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 00:34:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1235.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:34:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84912234C48C for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <915957858.31901270600473542.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6687) user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. In-Reply-To: <191053771.27981270592254332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6687: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6687-y20.2.patch Patch for hadoop-20 added. > user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6687-y20.2.patch > > > In case of a relogin, a new user object is created in the subject. This causes the subject to lose some state for example authentication method. Instead, a new user object should not be added to the subject if one is already present. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7232-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 00:40:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74816 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 00:40:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 00:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 93688 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 00:40:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93651 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 00:40:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93643 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 00:40:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:40:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1235.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:40:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10563234C48D for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <139504475.32091270600834065.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:40:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854281#action_12854281 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6686: -------------------------------------- This is definitely an improvement, but I wonder if it might be better yet if RemoteException didn't include the exception name in its message. It might include it in toString(), as is standard, but not in getMessage(). RemoteException has a field named "className" that already stores the remote exception name. It also redundantly includes the exception name in the exceptions message, since that's created from the value of Throwable#printStackTrace(). Rather RemoteException might parseout just the message (the first line, after the class name) and use that as its message and separately store the remote stack trace in a field, like the class name. Then, even if the exception is not unwrapped, its message and toString() would still match that of the original exception. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7233-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:32:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2226 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:32:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 13329 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13227 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13215 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:32:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1235.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:32:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4293234C4BC for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1931402982.34641270611153671.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854316#action_12854316 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6683: ----------------------------------- A comparision test was performed on a 1.8GB web log file. The result is as follows: || read file buffer size || write to compress stream buffer size || old time(secs) || new time(secs) || decrease % || |65536| 100 |67| 49| 26.8%| |65536| 200| 56.5| 46.5| 17.7%| |65536| 400| 51.5| 45| 12.6%| |65536| 800| 48.5| 44.5| 8.2%| |65536| 1024| 46.8| 44.2| 9.8%| |65536| 4096| 45| 43.5| 3.3%| |65536| 65536| 44.6| 43.2| 3.1%| Is there any standard benchmark for compression suitable for this case? > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7234-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:32:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2288 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13424 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13384 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13375 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:32:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:32:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:32:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9FC234C4B8 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1997280535.34601270611153648.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:32:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Paul Smith (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854315#action_12854315 ] Paul Smith commented on HADOOP-6671: ------------------------------------ Lars beat me to the jira comment, so I'll just say "Yeah, what Lars said". Happy to put my hand up to help, rather than a branch, I'd say a simply script like what was in HBASE-2099 is simple to work with for a reviewer, it outlines the migration steps needed rather than some hideous patch to review. In regards to AllanW's comments on sync'ing things around, that is still possible, rather than sync'ng the .ivy directory it's just ensuring the ~/.m2/repository directories are in sync, and then working in Maven's offline mode if that server doesn't have internet connectivity. Yes, one has to get the POM right, and that does come with experience, so perhaps if Lars and I can help here to get it off in the right direction that can ease any potential pain. IntelliJ and Eclipse Maven support is now 1st-class citizens really, Ivy less so. For future modularization, the Maven migration will pay off, splitting out code into nice modular chunks becomes much less work keeping the build system in sync. Anyway, happy to help out here too. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7235-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:36:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2806 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:36:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:36:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 15945 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:36:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15856 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:36:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15605 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:36:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:36:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1236.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:36:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F240234C4AB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1924885043.34701270611393519.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:36:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6677.patch Here's a patch to change the enum to a String. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7236-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:38:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2973 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:38:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:38:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:38:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16217 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:38:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16204 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:38:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:38:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:38:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C594234C4AB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1919804992.34741270611513639.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:38:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Assignee: Tom White Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7237-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:48:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4452 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:48:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:48:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 21398 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:48:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21362 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:48:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21345 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:48:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:48:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1236.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:48:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5B7234C4B2 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1833622004.34881270612113643.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:48:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: HADOOP-5064 > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7238-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:50:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4593 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:50:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:50:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 23759 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:50:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23571 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:50:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23553 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:50:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:50:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:50:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CF5234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <45613504.34951270612233592.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:50:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6675) Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc In-Reply-To: <358839696.663261270231228114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6675: ------------------------------ Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: HADOOP-5064 > Highlight Evolving elements in Javadoc > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6675 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6675 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > > It would be nice if we could mark Evolving (and Unstable) program elements in bold as the first word of the Javadoc comment (like "Deprecated"). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7239-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:52:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4908 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:52:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:52:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 25827 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:52:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25731 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25723 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:52:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:52:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB39234C4AC for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1737934621.35001270612353583.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:52:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7240-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:54:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5089 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:54:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27272 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:54:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27208 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27188 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:54:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:54:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1236.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:54:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C98234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1652417773.35071270612473612.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:54:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Fix Version/s: 0.21.0 > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7241-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:56:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5293 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 27990 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:56:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27915 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:56:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27905 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:56:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:56:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1236.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:56:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B42234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2121682951.35141270612593591.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:56:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854322#action_12854322 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440988/HADOOP-6677.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/444/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/444/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/444/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/444/console This message is automatically generated. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7242-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 03:58:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5610 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 03:58:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 03:58:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29180 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:58:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29074 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 03:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29066 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 03:58:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:58:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE618234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1114440895.35211270612714910.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:58:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854323#action_12854323 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------------- This would be a pretty big change to the classification scheme that was argued out quite exhaustively in HADOOP-5073; there should be time for people to re-hash if they wish before anything is committed. Nicholas had made the point there that having an enum avoids problems with typos and such, but this is a minor benefit. If we're removing the limitation of who should use LimitedPrivate, and who can depend on it, then it's not really limited private anymore? > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7243-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 04:00:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6439 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 04:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 04:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30981 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 04:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30490 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 04:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30399 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 04:00:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:00:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6CE234C4AF for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 04:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <781891790.35291270612833573.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 04:00:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6687) user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. In-Reply-To: <191053771.27981270592254332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854325#action_12854325 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6687: ----------------------------------- Which revision is the patch against? Since no such method "public boolean commit() throws LoginException" found in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20/src/core/org/apache/hadoop/security/UserGroupInformation.java. > user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6687-y20.2.patch > > > In case of a relogin, a new user object is created in the subject. This causes the subject to lose some state for example authentication method. Instead, a new user object should not be added to the subject if one is already present. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7244-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 04:55:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12514 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 04:55:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 04:55:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 69316 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 04:55:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69154 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 04:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69136 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 04:55:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:55:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:55:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830AA234C4B2 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 04:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <697071094.36141270616134535.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 04:55:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854344#action_12854344 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6674: --------------------------------------- This looks good. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7245-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 07:59:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46166 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 07:59:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 07:59:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 25366 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 07:59:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25254 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 07:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25237 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 07:59:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:59:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1237.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:59:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FA3234C4AB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:59:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Danny Leshem (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6688 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs, fs/s3 Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 Reporter: Danny Leshem Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: {code} java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) {code} (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7246-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 11:16:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80062 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 11:16:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 11:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 5866 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 11:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5756 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 11:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5738 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 11:15:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:15:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:15:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B846234C4AB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <615928254.40091270638933504.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:15:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6680) hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation In-Reply-To: <1629624146.687721270478607313.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854421#action_12854421 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6680: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk #296 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk/296/]) . hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation. Contributed by Andrew Klochkov. > hadoop-cloud push command invokes proxy creation > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6680 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6680 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6680.patch > > > There's a typo in src/contrib/cloud/src/py/hadoop/cloud/cli.py: when "push" command is invoked, the script actually invokes proxy creation instead of copying files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7247-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 16:20:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62900 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 16:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 16:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 79375 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78798 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78322 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 16:20:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:20:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1240.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:20:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15878234C4BB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <861198162.46241270657234087.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:20:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6671) To use maven for hadoop common builds In-Reply-To: <859246128.630391270120227191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854577#action_12854577 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6671: -------------------------------------- > The directory moving/renaming unfortunately tends not to work too well with Subversion and branches (or I was doing it wrong) so I don't know how big the benefit would be to start a new one for doing this. Yes, if the branch is at all long-lived it will require lots of merges to keep it up to date, and such merges will not be easy. In my experience tree reorganizations are easier to develop as: - a shell script that contains a sequence of 'svn mv' commands - a patch file to be applied after the script has run For example, AVRO-163 was developed this way. > To use maven for hadoop common builds > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6671 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6671 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > We are now able to publish hadoop artifacts to the maven repo successfully [ Hadoop-6382] > Drawbacks with the current approach: > * Use ivy for dependency management with ivy.xml > * Use maven-ant-task for artifact publishing to the maven repository > * pom files are not generated dynamically > To address this I propose we use maven to build hadoop-common, which would help us to manage dependencies, publish artifacts and have one single xml file(POM) for dependency management and artifact publishing. > I would like to have a branch created to work on mavenizing hadoop common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7248-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 16:58:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74230 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 44055 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44029 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44020 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:58:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:58:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89436234C4AB for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1171478926.47021270659513561.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:58:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854596#action_12854596 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------------- The problem with that approach is, if stack trace is printed for RemoteException (not sure if any does toString() for the exception), then the exception name printed will be RemoteException. The wrapped exception name is lost! > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7249-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:11:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77210 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 70783 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70759 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70751 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:11:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:11:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:11:16 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222AF234C4B9 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <201612114.47571270660241139.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:10:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854603#action_12854603 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------------- After running a quick test, looks like in Throwable#printStackTrace(), the first line printed is Throwable#toString(). This means the change you suggested can be made without losing the wrapped exception info, if we add toString() to RemoteException to print wrapped exception name. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7250-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:18:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79399 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 80498 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80456 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80414 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:18:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:18:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:18:55 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9062234C4AC for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:18:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6689 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: fs, test Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins Priority: Minor I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7251-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:20:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79611 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 80921 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80888 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80880 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:20:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:20:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7281D234C4A9 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <674251801.47741270660833467.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:20:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6689-1.patch Adds testRenameDirectoryAsEmptyDirectory and fixes some comments in testRenameDirectoryAsNonEmptyDirectory. Tested on HDFS and locally via TestHDFSFileContextMainOperations and TestHDFSFileContextMainOperations. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7252-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 17:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80466 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 17:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 17:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 86940 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:22:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86855 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86847 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:22:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:22:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:22:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CEF234C4B1 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <670545847.47811270660953760.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:22:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7253-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 18:52:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6376 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 18:52:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 18:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 22726 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:52:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22684 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 17:52:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22676 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 17:52:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:52:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:52:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78696234C4B2 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1739215520.48381270662753492.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:52:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854618#action_12854618 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6689: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441059/hadoop-6689-1.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/445/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/445/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/445/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/445/console This message is automatically generated. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7257-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 18:55:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7503 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 18:55:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 18:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 67970 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:28:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67931 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67923 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 18:28:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:28:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1242.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:28:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DD234C4A9 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1118540616.49151270664913663.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:28:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854638#action_12854638 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6689: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441066/hadoop-6689-2.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/446/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/446/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/446/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/446/console This message is automatically generated. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7258-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 19:04:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13769 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:04:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 7101 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 19:04:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7052 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 19:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7028 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 19:04:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:04:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:04:54 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B382234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1203106676.49571270667073635.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:04:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854647#action_12854647 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6686: -------------------------------------- > add toString() to RemoteException to print wrapped exception name +1 I think that's a good approach. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7256-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 19:10:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15988 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 40346 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40320 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40236 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEC4234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <60338526.48841270663833650.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7255-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 19:10:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16012 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 40259 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40191 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40133 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DFF234C4A9 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1995300475.48801270663833612.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6689-2.patch Right patch this time. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7254-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 19:10:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16013 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:10:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 40114 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40062 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40054 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 18:10:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1241.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:10:53 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCF3234C4AC for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <183977128.48821270663833637.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:10:33 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7259-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 07 23:21:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82205 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 23:21:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 23:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 20445 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 23:21:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20413 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2010 23:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20405 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2010 23:21:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:21:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1243.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:21:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD8234C4AE for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1663642933.61270682497083.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 23:21:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854721#action_12854721 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------------- With the change RemoteException has stack trace as exception message without the exception name. However unwrapped exceptions have only the first line from the stack trace without the exception name. Should we change the unwrapped exception to also include the stack trace? I think it will will be good for debugging. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7260-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 02:18:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12879 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 02:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 02:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 51878 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51851 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51837 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 02:17:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:17:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:17:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D539529A0014 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:17:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes ------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6690 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt Fix For: 0.22.0 FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): - setTimes(Path, long, long) - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) - getUsed() - deleteOnExit() I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7261-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 02:21:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13242 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 53766 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53732 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53723 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 02:21:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:21:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:21:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A708D29A0012 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <816143913.4311270693296682.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:21:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6563-1.patch Attached patch adds test coverage for intermediate symlinks in paths, and fixes a bug these tests uncovered. It also adds a lot of rename unit tests so that the full set of behavior with symlinks, and it conforms to the posix behavior (modulo the overwrite option which is not present in {{rename(2)}}). Here's the current FileContext#rename behavior, renaming *source* to *dest* on HDFS, augmented with symlinks: * If *source* does not exist then a FileNotFoundException is thrown. * If *dest* does not exist then *source* is renamed *dest*. If *source* is a symlink then the symlink itself is renamed, not the link target. * If *dest* exists and is a non-empty directory then an IOException is thrown. * If *dest* exists and the OVERWRITE option is not given then an IOException is thrown. * If *dest* exists and the OVERWRITE option is given then the behavior depends on the type of *source* and *dest*: ||Source|| Dest|| Result|| |fileA | fileB| Renames *fileA* to *fileB*| | | dirB| Fails: both need to be file or directory| | | linkB| *fileA* is renamed *linkB* (regardless of what *linkB* points to)| |dirA | fileB| Fails: both need to be file or directory| | | dirB| Renames *dirA* to *dirB* (*dirB* is empty)| | | linkB| Fails: both need to be file or directory| |linkA | fileB| Renames *linkA* to *fileB*| | | dirB| Fails: *dirB* is a directory| | | linkB| Renames *linkA* to *linkB* (regardless of what *linkB* points to)| > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7262-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 02:23:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13608 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 02:23:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 02:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 55200 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:23:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55168 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:23:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54989 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 02:23:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:23:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:23:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9864629A0012 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2115262619.4351270693416623.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:23:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7263-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 02:49:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16703 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 02:49:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 02:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 70944 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:49:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70880 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 02:49:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70837 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 02:49:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:49:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:48:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF00A29A0014 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2000578866.4721270694916715.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:48:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854777#action_12854777 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441102/hadoop-6563-1.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/447/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/447/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/447/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/447/console This message is automatically generated. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7264-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:09:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33560 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:09:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 42298 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41963 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41946 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:08:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:08:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2483234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <531383320.5441270699718794.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:08:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6678: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6678-1.patch Here's a patch for part 2, removes FileContext#isFile, isDirectory, and exists. Notes: * We no longer call fixRelativePart on the path passed to getFileStatus since that method already calls fixRelativePart on the argument (so this redundant call is now gone) * deleteOnExit now throws the FileNotFoundException like delete rather than return false * Removed UnresolvedLinkException from the throws clause of the public FileContext APIs since they'll never throw this exception (FileContext resolves links). * Patch applies to trunk plus HADOOP-6689 and HADOOP-6563 > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7265-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:14:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34336 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 46239 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:14:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46131 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:14:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46118 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:14:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:14:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:14:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0AF29A0016 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1449178439.5621270700076777.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6678: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7266-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:15:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34398 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:15:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:15:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46324 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:15:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46277 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46268 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:15:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:15:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:14:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B175A234C4B2 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1055289006.5541270700076725.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854789#action_12854789 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention, this patch also adds FileStatus#isFile, currently it just returns !isDir so that it's clear this change is mostly just changing syntax. Further FileStatus changes will be made in HADOOP-6585. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7267-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:27:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35667 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:27:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 52658 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:27:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52273 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52259 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:27:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:27:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:27:06 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B251234C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <304516670.5721270700805306.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:26:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854792#action_12854792 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6678: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441111/hadoop-6678-1.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 21 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/448/console This message is automatically generated. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7268-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:34:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36113 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:34:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 57832 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57736 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57727 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:34:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:34:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD005234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1607173243.5851270701276772.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:34:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854795#action_12854795 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Right, the patch requires HADOOP-6689 and HADOOP-6563, sorry for the noise. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7269-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 04:36:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36280 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 04:36:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 04:36:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 59228 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:36:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59128 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 04:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59120 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 04:36:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:36:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:36:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2188234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <291768451.5911270701396793.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 04:36:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854796#action_12854796 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------- Can you use FilterFs? It has setTimes. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7270-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 05:02:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39236 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 05:02:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 05:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81317 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 05:02:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81267 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 05:02:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81259 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 05:02:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 05:02:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1245.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 05:02:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F5D234C4B3 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1901914082.6321270702956760.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:02:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854810#action_12854810 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- Is FilterFs supposed to suppress FilterFileSystem? When was it introduced? > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7271-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 06:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50826 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 06:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 06:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 30979 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:31:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30845 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:31:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30827 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 06:31:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:31:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:30:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42A234C4BB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <405516146.7131270708237515.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:30:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt reassigned HADOOP-6690: --------------------------------------- Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7272-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 06:34:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51661 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 06:34:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 06:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 33663 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:34:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33149 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33136 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 06:34:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1246.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:34:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF03234C4B3 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <149282565.7241270708476785.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:34:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854831#action_12854831 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------- FilterFs is the AbstractFileSystem version of FilterFileSystem. If you're doing work on trunk you should be writing against the new APIs (or at least make sure they stay on par), if you're making a change against branch 20 then you'll want FilterFileSystem. I'm assuming you want setTimes to work on LocalFileSystem? > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7273-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 06:40:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58612 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 06:40:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 06:40:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36011 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:40:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35919 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 06:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35911 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 06:40:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:40:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1246.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:40:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD3234C4B1 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1554778221.7331270708837268.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:40:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854834#action_12854834 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- I noticed the problem when using contrib/raid, which currently relies on FilterFileSystem (because it was originally implemented on hadoop 0.20). Maybe we should change the trunk version to work with FilterFs. However, this workaround doesn't make FilterFileSystem more correct. We should either fix it or deprecate it so that people don't feel compelled to use it in the future. What do you think? > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7274-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 07:12:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63281 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 07:12:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 07:12:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 64011 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 07:12:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63902 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 07:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63776 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 07:12:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:12:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:11:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA938234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1852004665.7631270710696894.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:11:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854841#action_12854841 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------- Having FilterFileSystem override setTimes (and other APIs) is very reasonable. Just pointing out the new APIs in case you were doing trunk work. We'll want to move contrib/raid off FileSystem as part of HADOOP-6446. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7275-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 07:24:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65210 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 07:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 07:24:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 72658 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 07:24:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72547 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 07:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72536 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 07:24:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:24:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:23:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155D234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1301382618.7711270711417004.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:23:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854843#action_12854843 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- Sure! Thanks for the hint, BTW. With respect to HADOOP-6446, I should be able to help with Raid/Har/DistCp as soon as I'm done with some critical raid patches. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7276-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 18:48:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36228 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 18:48:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 18:48:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 95370 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:47:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95002 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:47:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94639 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 18:47:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:47:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1250.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:47:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C275234C4AB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:47:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang ------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6691 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.22.0 TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7277-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 18:51:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38698 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 3976 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3866 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3856 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:51:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1250.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:51:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4705234C4A9 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <393372529.18621270752696738.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:51:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6691: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7278-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 18:51:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38732 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 4112 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4001 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3990 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 18:51:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:51:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1250.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:51:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12AB234C1EF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <962547499.18601270752696724.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:51:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6691: ---------------------------------- Attachment: cachingHang.patch This patch uses Semaphore to fix the synchronization problem. > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7279-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 19:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41442 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 19:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 19:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 28195 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28124 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28109 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 19:01:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:01:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1250.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:01:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F24234C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <344287310.19001270753297629.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:01:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE updated HADOOP-6691: ------------------------------------------- Component/s: test Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1 patch looks good. > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7280-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 19:15:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45135 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 49272 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49244 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49236 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 19:15:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:15:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1250.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:15:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58CB234C4A9 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <444801227.19571270754136742.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6687) user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. In-Reply-To: <191053771.27981270592254332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855101#action_12855101 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6687: ---------------------------------------------- The patch is against yahoo-hadoop-20, which has the security code. I should have clarified that. It will be forward ported to trunk. > user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6687-y20.2.patch > > > In case of a relogin, a new user object is created in the subject. This causes the subject to lose some state for example authentication method. Instead, a new user object should not be added to the subject if one is already present. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7281-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 19:18:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45659 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 19:18:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 19:18:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 57379 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:18:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57329 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57321 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 19:18:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:18:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:17:59 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C364C234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <20253537.19651270754256799.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:17:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855105#action_12855105 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6691: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441194/cachingHang.patch against trunk revision 931226. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/449/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/449/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/449/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/449/console This message is automatically generated. > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7282-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:33:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75172 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:33:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:33:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 40040 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:33:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39957 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39947 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:33:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:33:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:32:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986F6234C1EF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1287285294.21951270762356623.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:32:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855169#action_12855169 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6691: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #215 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/215/]) HADOOP-6691. TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hangs. Contributed by Hairong Kuang. > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7283-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:35:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75718 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:35:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 41088 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:35:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41040 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41032 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:35:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:35:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:34:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6A234C1EF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1104971507.22061270762476854.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:34:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6691) TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang In-Reply-To: <252386459.18441270752457114.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6691: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've just committed this! > TestFileSystemCaching sometimes hang > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6691 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6691 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: cachingHang.patch > > > TestFileSystemCaching#testCacheEnabledWithInitializeForeverFS() sometimes hangs if InitializeForeverFileSystem initializes first. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7284-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:37:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76428 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:37:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 44515 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44478 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44456 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:37:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:37:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:36:59 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F7F234C4AD for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:36:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Propose change to FileContext#listStatus ---------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6692 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7285-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:46:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77730 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 57573 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57547 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57538 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:46:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:46:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1251.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:46:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCFD234C48D for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1813599937.22271270763196702.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:46:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Attachment: listStatusItor.patch This patch: # add Iterator listStatus(Path) to FileContext; # move FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to FileContext#Util; # add Iterator listStatusItor(Path) to AbstractFileSystem which provides a default implementation by using FileStatus[] listStatus(Path); # add unit test to test Iterator listStatus(Path). > Propose change to FileContext#listStatus > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7286-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:47:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77796 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:47:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 57775 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:47:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57695 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:47:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57678 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:47:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:47:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:46:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA35234C4AB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:46:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Add metrics to track kerberos login activity -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6693 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.22.0 Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7287-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 21:50:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78767 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 68858 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68799 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68791 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 21:50:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:50:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1251.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:50:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5F3234C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <428715501.22391270763436905.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:50:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855178#action_12855178 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- Thanks Eli for working on part 2. I will review it. Since Eli submitted the patch to part 2 to this jira, I created HADOOP-6692 for the listStatus change. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7288-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 22:17:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85177 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8091 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8063 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8055 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 22:17:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:17:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:16:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A319D234C4AB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2028330217.22821270764996667.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6693: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6693.patch Patch adds new metrics "login" of type MetricTimeVaryingRate under metrics context "ugi" and metrics record "ugi". > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7289-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 22:37:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87611 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 22:37:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 22:37:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 25641 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:37:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25612 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 22:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25604 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 22:37:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:37:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:36:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D2C234C48D for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1342138473.23161270766196686.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:36:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6585) Add FileStatus#isDirectory and isFile In-Reply-To: <649415366.425221266809667869.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6585: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6585-1.patch Patch attached. The change is fairly straightforward since almost all uses of isDir are called on FileStatus object retrieve using getFileStatus. Since getFileStatus fully resolves links the resulting status is either a file or a directory so !isDir can simply be replaced with isFile. Since FileSystem does not support symlinks isDir is equivalent to isDirectory, and isFile is equivalent to !isDir so those changes are straightforward as well. This patch applies against trunk with the patches for HADOOP-6563, and HADOOP-6678 applied. > Add FileStatus#isDirectory and isFile > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6585 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6585 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6585-1.patch > > > Per Sanjay's suggestion in HADOOP-6421 let's deprecate FileStatus#isDir() and add isDirectory() and isFile() to compliment isSymlink. Currently clients assume !isDir() implies a file, which is no longer true with symlinks. I'll file a separate jira to change the various uses of !isDir() to be isFile() or isFile() or isSymlink() as appropriate. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7290-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:33:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95887 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 67979 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67947 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67939 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:33:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:32:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF48D234C4A9 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2134993227.24211270769556979.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:32:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6658.patch New version of the doclets that takes a option to specify the stability: -unstable (the default), -evolving, -stable. For example, to exclude evolving APIs you would specify -stable. This is useful for using JDiff to examine compatibility differences. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7291-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:42:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96836 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:42:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:42:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 71029 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70979 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:42:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70971 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:42:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:42:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1252.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:42:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A940D234C4AC for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <407286493.24481270770156692.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:42:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855211#action_12855211 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- +1 on Eli's patch. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7292-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:43:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96886 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:43:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:43:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 71141 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:43:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71111 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71103 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:43:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:43:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:42:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ABC234C4B5 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1085347214.24541270770156792.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:42:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang reassigned HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Eli Collins > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7293-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:44:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97222 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 71917 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71855 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71847 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:44:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1252.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:44:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA48234C4AE for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2093025351.24621270770276706.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7294-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:44:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97234 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 72064 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71985 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71967 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:44:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:44:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1252.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:44:56 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7256234C4A9 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1244144472.24581270770276683.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:44:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7295-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 08 23:49:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97631 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:49:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 73537 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:49:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73500 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 23:49:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73492 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 23:49:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:49:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:48:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D321234C1EF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1694183112.24671270770516642.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:48:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6694) Implement listStatus that returns an Iterator of FileStatus MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Implement listStatus that returns an Iterator of FileStatus ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6694 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6694 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Hairong Kuang Assignee: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.22.0 This jira is for an efficient implementation of the method Iterator listStatus(Path) in HDFS. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7296-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:04:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 481 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:04:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:04:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 87018 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:04:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86985 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:04:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86977 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:04:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:04:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1252.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:04:57 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5B2234C4C2 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1875694320.25121270771477189.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7297-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:05:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 584 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:05:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 87220 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87188 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87167 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:05:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:04:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EBE234C4BB for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1515433683.25051270771477146.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7298-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:05:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 723 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:05:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 87355 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87323 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87315 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:05:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:05:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:04:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A07F234C4AD for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1438450118.24941270771477040.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6668.patch New patch with a few more annotations. With this patch and a similar backport to the 0.20 branch, the differences with the 0.20 (generated by HADOOP-6658 and a modified JDiff that doesn't show compatible changes) look like this: http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/jdiff/changes.html. These are a mixture of compatible changes (that look incompatible to JDiff, e.g. the ones in org.apache.hadoop.io.compress), or elements that were deprecated in 0.20 and have been removed in trunk, e.g. FileSystem#delete(Path). Do we need to restore these deprecated methods in trunk for compatibilities sake in the forthcoming 0.21 release? > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7299-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:09:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1194 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89179 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89146 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89138 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:09:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:08:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED2C234C4AE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1797423329.25201270771716715.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:08:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855220#action_12855220 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441232/HADOOP-6658.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/450/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/450/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/450/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/450/console This message is automatically generated. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7300-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 00:27:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7793 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 00:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 00:27:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 4531 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:27:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4500 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 00:27:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4487 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 00:27:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:27:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:26:58 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CA6234C4AE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <721456456.25481270772796882.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:26:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855223#action_12855223 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441236/HADOOP-6668.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/451/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/451/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/451/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/451/console This message is automatically generated. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7301-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 02:17:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28538 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 02:17:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 02:17:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 94467 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94428 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94420 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 02:17:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:17:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4951234C4AD for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1143585732.201270779410869.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:16:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Kang updated HADOOP-6683: ------------------------------ Release Note: Improve the buffer utilization of ZlibCompressor to avoid invoking a JNI per write request. Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7302-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 02:40:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33050 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 02:40:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 02:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 11863 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11812 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 02:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11804 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 02:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:40:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9D5234C4AD for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1635961066.351270780790848.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:39:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855255#action_12855255 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6683: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440826/ZlibCompressor.java.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/452/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/452/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/452/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/452/console This message is automatically generated. > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7303-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 04:46:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48723 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 04:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 04:46:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 73403 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72937 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 04:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72618 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 04:46:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:46:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1253.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:46:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A4329A0011 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 04:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <679324412.961270788350812.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 04:45:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6695) Job Tracker should be able to refresh classpath without restarting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Job Tracker should be able to refresh classpath without restarting ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6695 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6695 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.20.1 Reporter: Ted Yu When I tried to run HBase export in cluster mode, I copied zookeeper-3.2.1.jar to hadoop lib directory. But initial attempts failed with java.lang.ClassNotFoundException because job tracker wasn't restarted. It is desirable for job tracker to pick up new classpath without restarting which is sometimes hard to do in production environment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7304-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 06:52:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70660 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 06:52:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 06:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 59476 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 06:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59361 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 06:52:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59353 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 06:52:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:52:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:52:16 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D4B29A0011 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <267539718.2781270795915145.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:51:55 +0000 (UTC) From: "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855298#action_12855298 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------------- Hi Doug, -1 The RPC system is fundamental to hadoop's stability. Until your proposal has been formally documented, including an IDL, which I think is critical to the stated goal of backward compatibility, I'm not going to be comfortable seeing it committed. Beyond understanding the design, you need a testing plan and test results to review. Without this step, you will be throwing a huge tax onto others in the community. We have the downside of all this change and have to work hard to debug your work, yet we see no benefit. If you want to perform radical surgery on Hadoop, you need to convince the community that taking your work is worth the risk you are imposing on us. Bugs in Hadoop can take down businesses. In yahoo's case, they can cost us millions of dollars in lost revenue. Perhaps you can proceed as you suggest on a branch where you will not disrupt other work or impose an unfair testing burden on the project? E14 > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7305-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 08:32:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87086 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 08:32:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 08:32:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 73834 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 08:32:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73705 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 08:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73697 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 08:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1254.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:32:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412029A0013 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1833832220.3641270801911474.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:31:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3262) make Hadoop compile under Apache Harmony MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855317#action_12855317 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-3262: ---------------------------------------- Note that although the original bug HARMONY-5807 is fixed, until Harmony moves to Java 6, Hadoop will not compile under it. > make Hadoop compile under Apache Harmony > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3262 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3262 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Attachments: HADOOP-3262.patch > > > Some small changes are required to get Hadoop Core to compile with Apache Harmony. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7306-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 11:28:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16321 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 11:28:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 11:28:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 39783 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39673 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39665 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 11:28:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:28:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:28:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE3F29A0014 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <921469300.5171270812470895.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:27:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Xiao Kang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6683) the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer In-Reply-To: <2121624364.706511270518987284.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855353#action_12855353 ] Xiao Kang commented on HADOOP-6683: ----------------------------------- This patch does not add any new function and he test case src/test/org/apache/hadoop/core/io/compress/TestCodec.java has covered this patch. > the first optimization: ZlibCompressor does not fully utilize the buffer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6683 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6683 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: io > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Xiao Kang > Attachments: ZlibCompressor.java.patch > > > Thanks for Hong Tang's advice. > Sub task created for the first optimization. HADOOP-6662 closed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7307-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 11:42:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18425 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 11:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 11:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 49309 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:42:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49247 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49236 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 11:42:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:42:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:42:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C919E234C1EF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <654841781.5281270813311822.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:41:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855356#action_12855356 ] Andrew Klochkov commented on HADOOP-6681: ----------------------------------------- Yes, it does solve the issue. > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7308-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 11:50:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19742 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 11:50:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 11:50:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 58762 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:50:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58708 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 11:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58677 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 11:50:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:50:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3D729A0011 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:49:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6696 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: contrib/cloud Reporter: Andrew Klochkov Assignee: Andrew Klochkov contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7309-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 12:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22517 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:06:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 73556 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73519 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73511 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:06:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1255.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:06:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8D729A0013 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1906345555.5561270814751570.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6696: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6696.patch Attached a patch. Some notes on this implementation: 1. It enables Hadoop service deployment only, it doesn't work for zookeeper. 2. Configuration is done in $HOME/.hadoop-cloud/clusters.cfg. Sample config is below. It's set to run jobtracker, namenode and secondary namenode on 172.16.128.203, and run 2 slaves on 172.16.128.206 and 172.16.128.239. Parameter NUM_SLAVES of the launch-cluster command becomes meaningless in case of fixed provider. README is not modified. [fixed-cluster] cloud_provider=fixed image_id= instance_type= key_name= availability_zone= public_key=/keys/location/hadoop.pem private_key=/keys/location/hadoop.pem ssh_options=-i %(private_key)s -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no nodes.nn_snn_jt=172.16.128.203 nodes.dn_tt=172.16.128.206, 172.16.128.239 env=MAX_MAP_TASKS=2 env=MAX_REDUCE_TASKS=1 3. Files hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh and hadoop-fixed-init-remote.sh in "data" dir are almost identical. Obviously it makes sense to extract common code in a separate scripts, and later use it by other providers too. > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7310-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 12:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22576 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 73675 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73651 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73643 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:06:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:06:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E91F29A0015 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <15390055.5581270814751583.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6696: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7311-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 12:16:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24524 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:16:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:16:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87841 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:16:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87793 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87671 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:16:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:16:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:16:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1E429A0013 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1691420732.5731270815351046.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:15:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855365#action_12855365 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6696: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441291/HADOOP-6696.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/453/console This message is automatically generated. > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7312-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 12:42:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36676 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:42:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 7149 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:42:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7117 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7105 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:42:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:42:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:42:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4108234C1EF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1338746519.5911270816910801.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:41:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6696: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7313-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 12:44:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37193 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:44:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 14455 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:44:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14429 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14421 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:44:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:44:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1255.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:44:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB804234C1EF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1255161641.5931270817030897.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6696: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6696.patch First patch was incorrect. Attaching a correct one. > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch, HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7314-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 13:04:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43156 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 54458 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54423 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54415 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 13:04:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:04:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:04:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E2C234C1EF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1561889313.6181270818230993.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:03:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andrew Klochkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Klochkov updated HADOOP-6696: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch, HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7315-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 13:30:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48459 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 13:30:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 13:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 79425 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:30:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79338 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 13:30:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79232 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 13:30:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:30:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1255.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:30:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0466234C1EF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1548946120.6441270819790786.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:29:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6696) Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment In-Reply-To: <992554534.5321270813791171.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855383#action_12855383 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6696: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441292/HADOOP-6696.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/454/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/454/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/454/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/454/console This message is automatically generated. > Use contrib/cloud scripts for hardware cluster deployment > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6696 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Assignee: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6696.patch, HADOOP-6696.patch > > > contrib/cloud scripts can be used as an easy way to deploy Hadoop on a hardware cluster, by implementing a "fixed" provider. Here "fixed" means it uses a preconfigured set of hosts to deploy to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7316-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 15:24:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78752 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 43922 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43887 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43879 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 15:24:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:24:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:24:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61AF29A0014 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1757698896.8521270826630941.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6681) Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances In-Reply-To: <315596123.688091270479567264.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6681: ------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks Andrew. > Fill AWS credentials when configuring Hadoop on EC2 instances > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6681 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6681 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/cloud > Reporter: Andrew Klochkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6681.patch > > > There's a function "configure_hadoop" in the hadoop-ec2-init-remote.sh script used to configure EC2 nodes for Hadoop. The function actually uses AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID and AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY environment variables, but they are never passed to it. It can be fixed in service.py by passing those variables. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7317-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 16:29:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96844 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 16:29:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 16:29:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 44543 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:29:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44514 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:29:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44506 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 16:29:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:29:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1256.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:29:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C77D234C4C8 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <363819536.9771270830531181.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:28:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855460#action_12855460 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- Eric, this work is proceeding using a "branch in place" strategy, since long-lived branches are onerous to mange. The intent is to be largely equivalent to a branch, in that existing code will not be disturbed. The first step was to make the RPC functionality we wish to replace pluggable. That was committed last September in HADOOP-6170. Now we can develop and test the new RPC implementation without disturbing the existing implementation. There is no intent to switch to the new implementation until all concerns about it are resolved. Some minor, non-functional changes have and will be made to the existing implementation to aid IDL inference, i.e. adding some annotations and renaming some private methods in (HDFS-1077). > Until your proposal has been formally documented, including an IDL, which I think is critical to the stated goal of backward compatibility, I'm not going to be comfortable seeing it committed. This issue does not attempt to fully implement cross-version wire-compatiblity. Nor does it attempt to move Hadoop to IDL-driven RPC. Rather it proposes to move Hadoop to a system that we can use to implement wire-compatibility and IDL-driven RPC. Until we switch, we cannot dictate the IDL, the IDL is derived from the existing Java interfaces used to define RPC protocols. Once we've switched to the new Avro-based implementation, then we can elect to, protocol-by-protocol, client-by-client and server-by-server, switch to an IDL-driven implementation. (An IDL derived by the current Java interfaces is attached to HDFS-1069. This is in JSON form, but Avro has an alternate IDL syntax that, by the time we consider switching, would be used instead.) Changes to the protocol often imply changes to client and server logic. This issue does not propose to alter client and server logic, but rather to track and retain the existing logic and protocols. Before we make a release that we claim will support wire-compatibility we should certainly review our protocols carefully. But first we need to switch an RPC system that permits clients and servers to use different protocol versions and that supports IDL-driven protocols. That's the primary focus of this issue. Once we switch, our wire-compatibility problems will not be automatically solved, rather we'll then have tools in place to address them. > Beyond understanding the design, you need a testing plan and test results to review. Yes, I agree, this should be fully tested to everyone's satisfaction before we make any switch. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7318-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 16:39:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98848 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 16:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 16:39:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 61271 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:39:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61244 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 16:39:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61236 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 16:39:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:39:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:39:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343EC29A0011 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <314161499.9971270831131213.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:38:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6697) script to that would let us checkout code from different repos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org script to that would let us checkout code from different repos -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6697 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: build Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan To write a shell script that would let us checkout code from two different repository , where we cant use svn:externals. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7319-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:03:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8441 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:03:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:03:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 7367 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7329 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7321 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:03:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:03:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:03:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF17429A0014 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2092997274.11291270832570912.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:02:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Propose change to FileContext#listStatus > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7320-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:20:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13801 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:20:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:20:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32659 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32621 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32613 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:20:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:20:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1256.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:20:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C868729A0014 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1473580671.11571270833590819.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jeff Bowles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6697) script to that would let us checkout code from different repos In-Reply-To: <314161499.9971270831131213.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Bowles updated HADOOP-6697: -------------------------------- Release Note: A simple piece of shell-script plumbing, so that you can invoke a single-script to take a specific action (loading a secondary GIT or SVN repository prior to running a build, possibly to load your build-scripts from a second-source that has different IP restrictions). Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > script to that would let us checkout code from different repos > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > To write a shell script that would let us checkout code from two different repository , where we cant use svn:externals. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7321-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:22:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14363 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 34888 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34851 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34843 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:22:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:22:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:22:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFE029A0012 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <345116030.11601270833710838.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:21:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855478#action_12855478 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6693: ----------------------------------------- Note that the new metrics is aggregated across all the nodes in the cluster, since no distinction made in metrics record name about the node where the metrics was reported from. > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7322-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:30:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16589 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:30:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:30:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 43796 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:30:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43752 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43744 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:30:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:30:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:30:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B45234C4BC for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2104668537.11881270834190956.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855482#action_12855482 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6692: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441211/listStatusItor.patch against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/455/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/455/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/455/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/455/console This message is automatically generated. > Propose change to FileContext#listStatus > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7323-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:32:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16968 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 44641 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44606 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44598 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:32:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:32:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB332234C4AE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1259330561.11961270834310897.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:31:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4322) Input/Output Format for TFile MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855483#action_12855483 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-4322: ----------------------------------- When this patch is tested internally, we found some problem - the job gives out negative "input byes" count when using this outputformat. I don't have any context about this, but just updating this bug with the analysis by Rahul.. {code} ObjectFileRecordReader has getPos() method implementation , this method is giving incorrect values for offset. Code flow in the framework is like below. ===== beforePos = getPos(); //call to user's record reader 'next() method. afterPos = getPos(); //then for counter we do the following: inputByteCounter.increment(afterPos - beforePos);//this is the counter which is //in question ===== (ObjectFileRecordReader's getPos() method ) afterPos < beforePos , this is resulting in the -ve increment to the counter. {code} So this patch shouldn't be committed as is without a relook. > Input/Output Format for TFile > ----------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4322 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4322 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Amir Youssefi > Assignee: Amir Youssefi > Attachments: ObjectFileInputOutputFormat_1.patch > > > Input/Output Format for TFile -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7324-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:34:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17191 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 48307 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48217 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 48148 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:34:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:34:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270F0234C4AD for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1649880560.12051270834431158.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:33:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6697) script to that would let us checkout code from different repos In-Reply-To: <314161499.9971270831131213.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855484#action_12855484 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6697: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org against trunk revision 932115. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/456/console This message is automatically generated. > script to that would let us checkout code from different repos > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > To write a shell script that would let us checkout code from two different repository , where we cant use svn:externals. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7325-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18534 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 61491 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:42:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61449 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61441 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:42:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:42:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1257.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:42:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0888234C4AB for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <999266844.12291270834910984.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:41:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6697) script to that would let us checkout code from different repos In-Reply-To: <314161499.9971270831131213.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855487#action_12855487 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6697: -------------------------------------- Can you explain this more? > script to that would let us checkout code from different repos > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6697 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > > To write a shell script that would let us checkout code from two different repository , where we cant use svn:externals. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7326-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 17:58:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23276 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:58:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:58:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 96615 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96575 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 17:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96567 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 17:58:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:58:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:58:12 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08AB234C4AC for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1988987109.12681270835870853.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6686.1.patch Updated patch: # RemoteException message is server side stack trace minus redundant exception name prefix. # Unwrapped exceptions from remote exception has same message as RemoteException, instead of picking only the first line from the server stack trace. The unwrapped message is same as that of RemoteException message. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7327-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 09 18:28:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36380 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 18:28:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 18:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 35357 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 18:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35255 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 18:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35234 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 18:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1257.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:28:11 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD94C234C4AC for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <597761108.13231270837670906.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:27:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855508#action_12855508 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6692: ----------------------------------------- Hairong, this is a good change. In order to simplify transition to FileContext, should we retain the old FileContext.listStatus() method as it is and add iterative list status as listStatusIterator()? It also captures the semantics quite well. Minor: # FileContext.listStatus() that returns iterator - add information about throwing UnsupportedOperationException and NoSuchElementException in the RuntimeExceptions section on attempt to delete an entry from iterator. # FileContext.listStatus() that retuns array - has invalid description in @return. Also add a note to use the itertor version if the need is to iterate over the list, with a @link to the other method # AFS.listStatusItertor() - method javadoc should point @link to the right method in FileContext. # AFS.listStatus() - method javadoc should point @link to the right method in FileContext. Current link is invalid and is missing # prefix to listStatus(). > Propose change to FileContext#listStatus > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7328-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 10 23:29:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16004 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2010 23:29:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Apr 2010 23:29:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 98512 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2010 23:29:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98482 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2010 23:29:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98474 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2010 23:29:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:29:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:29:00 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3ANMnlK000830 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <15787287.5791270941769321.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:22:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855655#action_12855655 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------------- Hi Doug, Thanks, I think I understand your "branch in place" proposal. I think you need to understand my position. I'm responsible for making sure the hadoop code base is stable enough that we can run our production work on it. If we move incrementally as you propose, my customers will be exposed to a lot of risk and disruption for no return. Yahoo QA staff and developers will be pulled off what they are working on to complete this project. That is not how we want to allocate our resources. That is why I'm rejecting your current proposal and suggesting that you instead do more work on an actual branch, including getting the IDL based RPC scheme coded. Once you build something that has actual return for my customers, than we will be happy to help with the final debug and tuning, but first I would like to see you complete the project. Only then do I want to see something that effects every single RPC call incorporated into the code base. I understand that this is not how you would like to proceed and I understand that this is not historically how you would have proceeded with a project like this in Hadoop. But, as Hadoop evolves and the number of business built on it increase, the way we approach radical change in the code base needs to change as well. I assert that to proceed with something as radical as this, you need the consensus of Hadoop committers behind you. You do not have it. Please understand that I am supportive of your desire to incorporate an AVRO based RPC into Hadoop. I just feel that you need to take a more cautious approach. Otherwise you tax the entire community and I don't support that. Thanks! > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7329-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 11 07:16:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49077 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2010 07:16:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2010 07:16:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 24606 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 07:16:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24491 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 07:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24483 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2010 07:16:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1261.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 07:16:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3B7Afwo000863 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:10:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:10:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6698 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Reporter: Owen O'Malley Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.21.0 I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7330-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 11 13:22:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78962 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2010 13:22:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2010 13:22:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 49599 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 13:22:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49559 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 13:22:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49551 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2010 13:22:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:22:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1261.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:22:50 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3BDGfZP003962 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:16:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4713826.9511270991801071.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:16:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6699) Make MapFile interface consistent with SequenceFile MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Make MapFile interface consistent with SequenceFile --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6699 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6699 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: io Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1 Reporter: Gianmarco De Francisci Morales Priority: Minor The constructor for the SequenceFile.Reader/Writer classes accept a Path object as the specification of the file to read. MapFile related classes instead want a String object that represents the MapFile directory. I propose to make them consistent by replacing the String parameter with a Path one in MapFile related classes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7331-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 11 16:58:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10908 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 63874 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 16:58:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63824 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2010 16:58:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63816 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2010 16:58:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:58:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3BGqgwh012041 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:52:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25584078.11261271004762892.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:52:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6695) Job Tracker should be able to refresh classpath without restarting In-Reply-To: <679324412.961270788350812.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855751#action_12855751 ] Ted Yu commented on HADOOP-6695: -------------------------------- One possibility is for JobClient to pass its effective CLASSPATH, e.g. through (a new) mapred.job.classpath JobConf property, to JobTracker. JobTracker examines this classpath against its classpath to find new jars and put them into DistributedCache. The benefit is that when user adds new jars to HADOOP_CLASSPATH which get picked up by JobClient, JobTracker is able to honor the addition. > Job Tracker should be able to refresh classpath without restarting > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6695 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6695 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Ted Yu > > When I tried to run HBase export in cluster mode, I copied zookeeper-3.2.1.jar to hadoop lib directory. > But initial attempts failed with java.lang.ClassNotFoundException because job tracker wasn't restarted. > It is desirable for job tracker to pick up new classpath without restarting which is sometimes hard to do in production environment. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7332-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 06:36:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40515 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 06:36:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 06:36:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21712 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 06:36:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21596 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 06:36:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21588 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 06:36:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:36:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1264.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:36:02 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3C6Zfeg023038 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:35:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13117554.17981271054141421.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:35:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Moved: (HADOOP-6700) Hadoop commands guide should include examples MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu moved MAPREDUCE-1691 to HADOOP-6700: ------------------------------------------------------------ Project: Hadoop Common (was: Hadoop Map/Reduce) Key: HADOOP-6700 (was: MAPREDUCE-1691) Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 (was: 0.22.0) Component/s: documentation (was: documentation) > Hadoop commands guide should include examples > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6700 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6700 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Currently, The Hadoop command guide (http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.20.0/commands_manual.html) just lists all the available command line options, with a description. It should include examples for each command for more clarity. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7333-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 16:11:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95358 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 16:11:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 16:11:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 75053 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75019 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 16:11:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75011 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 16:11:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:11:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CGAoCZ027988 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:10:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1792291.26381271088650982.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:10:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856045#action_12856045 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- Eric, the fundamental change that adds "risk" has already been committed to trunk, in HADOOP-6422, permitting one to swap in a different RPC implementation via the configuration. After that, until we make the switch, no changes should be made that affect runtime behavior. So if you have a problem with that change, please have one of your committers veto and revert it and I will stop working on this. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7334-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:32:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65134 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13056 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13010 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13002 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:32:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:32:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CIVqsl029671 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:31:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" ---------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6701 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0, 0.19.1 Reporter: Ravi Phulari Assignee: Ravi Phulari Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? chgrp: changing ownership of 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied 0 ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? chown: changing ownership of 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied 0 ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST 0 - Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7335-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:32:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65212 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 13201 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13168 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13160 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:32:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1269.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:32:18 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CIVvfe029779 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:31:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9112463.3161271097117915.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:31:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856107#action_12856107 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- While Avro reflection will make it easier to get AVRO into Hadoop's wire protocol, I believe that AVRO IDL-driven protocols are necessary for wire compatibility. Why? * A protocol needs to be designed to be compatible. Serialization technologies like PB and Avro allows one to add/delete fields easily; I like that, but it can be misleading. I don't think we designed the current Hadoop protocols carefully with an eye towards compatibility. ** For example, as part of HDFS-1052 we would like to extend a the blockId to have an additional field. Avro would help us do that very easily, but it would not work unless the client side treats the blockid as an opaque object that is NOT deserialized and simply passed unintepreted to the DNs. I think there are many such examples. * RMI and Hadoop RPC make it too easy to pass any Java object that one is using internally across the wire. Avro using reflection will continue that. One needs to examine every object that is being passed across the wire decide if it necessary and what its type should be. * PB and Avro are very powerful and useful tools - unfortunately a Reflection based approach make badly designed protocols appear to be good because they give you the impression that your protocol is magically compatible; and it mostly does, but it can miss corner cases and encourages creating messy protocol that exposes too many types. Hence I propose that we take every single Hadoop protocol and design it for compatibility using Avro IDL. (HDFS-1069, MAPREDUCE-1689) Based on what I have read, I believe Doug is agreeing with the above. Switching to IDL however, is not a pluggable change - hence this part needs to be done in a branch. The question I have been struggling with is: what are benefits of the reflection scheme since I assert that the resulting protocols *cannot* be declared as "the hadoop wire-compatible protocols". The only benefit is that the reflection based protocols can be used for cross-language access to hadoop. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7336-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:36:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66077 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 18381 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18353 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18345 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1269.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:36:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CIZoH3029810 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:35:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1795078.3241271097350791.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:35:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0, 0.19.1 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7337-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:36:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66117 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18512 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18489 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18481 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:36:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:36:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CIZn8w029798 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:35:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31751202.3201271097349768.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:35:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701.patch Attaching simple patch for fixing exit codes for -ch(mod/grp/own) commands. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7338-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:38:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67399 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:38:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:38:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22489 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:38:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22449 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22441 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:38:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:38:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:38:18 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CIbvBP029943 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:37:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <18158216.3611271097476998.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:37:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856111#action_12856111 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- Doug says: > switch HDFS [and MR] to use Avro RPC serialization by default. Given that the resulting protocols are not the official wire compatible protocol, why change the default till we have completed the move to Avro IDL? > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7339-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:50:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69987 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 46041 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45993 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45985 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:50:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:50:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CInnAs000059 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:49:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33216045.3911271098189600.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:49:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch Attaching patch for trunk. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7340-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 18:56:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70799 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 51890 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51853 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51845 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:56:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1269.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:56:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CItu5N000212 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:55:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12858218.4381271098556261.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:55:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856123#action_12856123 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- > AVRO IDL-driven protocols are necessary for wire compatibility. I agree. As I said above, before we declare that we support wire-compatibility we should perform a careful audit of our RPC protocols. With the approach I've suggested, this can largely be pursued in parallel. Until we switch we can examine the reflected protocol and work to improve (or at least develop a list of proposed improvements) the Java interfaces. > what are benefits of the reflection scheme By not branching we can continue development of HDFS and mapreduce in parallel while we develop and test a new RPC serialization and transport. As mentioned above, once we've switched to Avro-serialization using reflect, then we can begin, protocol-by-protocol, switching each to an IDL-based approach. Each protocol can be addressed in a separate issue with no massive branch required. We might, e.g., prioritize client-facing protocols first, so that we can support wire compatibility of clients before we support rolling cluster upgrades. We can even separate updating clients from updating servers. Once we've completed the transition to an IDL-driven system, then we can, protocol-by-protocol, method-by-method, work to improve the IDL to the point where we're willing to declare our support of wire-compatibility. At no point is trunk broken or are large areas blocked from changes and fixes. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7341-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 19:20:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76794 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 85984 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85947 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85939 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:20:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:20:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CJJndi000385 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:19:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19279931.4771271099989836.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:19:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException In-Reply-To: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856131#action_12856131 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6688: ----------------------------------- Could this be a consistency issue, like HADOOP-6208? I'm not sure a blanket ignore of FileNotFoundExceptions is quite right: if you call delete with a path that doesn't exist should it not throw FileNotFoundException? I can see that if a file in a subdirectory of the path being deleted doesn't exist then that should not result in a FileNotFoundException. You might want to check if the new FileContext API exhibits the same problem, so it can be considered for the contract there too. I don't think this is a blocker. As a workaround you could create a wrapped FileOutputCommitter that catches and ignores FileNotFoundException. > FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6688 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 > Reporter: Danny Leshem > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. > This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. > The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. > The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: > {code} > java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > {code} > (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7342-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 19:44:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84395 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 6801 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6762 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6753 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:44:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1270.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:44:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CJhnr0000509 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33456055.4991271101429708.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:43:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856137#action_12856137 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6686: -------------------------------------- +1 This looks good to me. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7343-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 20:00:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90849 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 26311 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26276 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26268 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:00:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:00:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CJxnPa000775 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <27199217.5521271102389444.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:59:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Danny Leshem (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException In-Reply-To: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856145#action_12856145 ] Danny Leshem commented on HADOOP-6688: -------------------------------------- Tom, this is a classic issue of coding "for the programmer" or "against the programmer". What is the expected effect of calling FileSystem.delete(someFile)? A reasonable answer would be "someFile no longer exists", and the method should throw an exception only if that expected effect somehow did not happen, meaning the file is there. For those unlikely users who care whether the file was actually deleted or wasn't there to begin with, you can have FileSystem.delete() return a boolean to convey this information. This is common practice in many file system APIs. I have no idea as to the root cause of the file not existing. It might be a similar consistency issue to the one you mentioned - I have not looked into it. Since fixing FileSystem.delete is rather easy (and the change is very contained), I think it's a better solution than working around the issue. > FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6688 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 > Reporter: Danny Leshem > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. > This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. > The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. > The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: > {code} > java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > {code} > (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7344-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 20:40:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1244 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 73274 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73244 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73236 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:40:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CKdo93001151 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:39:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <27405518.6311271104790390.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:39:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException In-Reply-To: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856158#action_12856158 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6688: ----------------------------------- I think this is related to the discussion in HADOOP-6631 about having a 'force' option for delete. I didn't mean to suggest that this issue shouldn't be fixed, I was merely pointing out a workaround that might solve your problem in the meantime, while the filesystem semantics are discussed in more detail. > FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6688 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 > Reporter: Danny Leshem > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. > This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. > The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. > The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: > {code} > java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > {code} > (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7345-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 20:57:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7351 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 5088 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5039 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4917 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:57:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CKunhN001549 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <17396326.6551271105809673.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:56:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856164#action_12856164 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------------- Doug, could you please review and +1 HDFS-1083 as well. Committing both these changes together will keep the window for which HDFS test fails small. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7346-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 20:59:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9425 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 20:59:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 20:59:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 11932 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11896 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 20:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11870 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 20:59:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:59:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1270.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:59:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CKwpnJ001592 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:58:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <18743668.6651271105931804.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:58:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6507) Hadoop Common Docs - delete 3 doc files that do not belong under Common In-Reply-To: <1315292172.20371264211241498.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White resolved HADOOP-6507. ------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks Corinne! > Hadoop Common Docs - delete 3 doc files that do not belong under Common > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6507 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6507 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Assignee: Corinne Chandel > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > Delete these 3 files from Hadoop Common TRUNK > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\streaming.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop MAPREDUCE TRUNK) > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\libhdfs.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop HDFS TRUNK) > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\hdfs_permissions_guide.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop HDFS TRUNK) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7347-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 21:13:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18868 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 32348 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32319 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32311 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:13:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1270.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:13:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CLCn8M001733 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:12:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12471585.7061271106769898.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:12:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6507) Hadoop Common Docs - delete 3 doc files that do not belong under Common In-Reply-To: <1315292172.20371264211241498.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856176#action_12856176 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6507: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #216 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/216/]) HADOOP-6507. Hadoop Common Docs - delete 3 doc files that do not belong under Common. Contributed by Corinne Chandel. > Hadoop Common Docs - delete 3 doc files that do not belong under Common > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6507 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6507 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentation > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Corinne Chandel > Assignee: Corinne Chandel > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > Delete these 3 files from Hadoop Common TRUNK > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\streaming.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop MAPREDUCE TRUNK) > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\libhdfs.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop HDFS TRUNK) > \src\docs\src\documentation\content\xdocs\hdfs_permissions_guide.xml (this file already in (and belongs in) Hadoop HDFS TRUNK) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7348-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 21:37:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45829 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 73851 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73824 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73816 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:37:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:37:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CLanLD001910 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13060465.7551271108209697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:36:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856188#action_12856188 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6701: -------------------------------------------- Looks like the patch is incomplete because it the case with {{chmod}}. The other two seem intact to me. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7349-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 21:39:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47109 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 74682 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74633 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74625 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:39:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1270.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:39:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CLcqJ5001970 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5769839.7731271108332131.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:38:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6422) permit RPC protocols to be implemented by Avro In-Reply-To: <931659516.1260389418441.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856190#action_12856190 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6422: -------------------------------------- For the record, I mis-identified the primary commit for this issue. The revision was 889889. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=889889 > permit RPC protocols to be implemented by Avro > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6422 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6422 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Assignee: Doug Cutting > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6422.patch, HADOOP-6422.patch, HADOOP-6422.patch, HADOOP-6422.patch, HADOOP-6422.patch > > > To more easily permit Hadoop to evolve to use Avro RPC, I propose to change RPC to use different implementations for clients and servers based on the configuration. This is not intended as an end-user configuration: only a single RPC implementation will be supported in a given release, but rather a tool to permit us to more easily develop and test new RPC implementations. As such, the configuration parameters used would not be documented. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7350-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 22:11:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63572 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 10045 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10008 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9994 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:11:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1270.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:11:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CMAn2I002174 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:10:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13294811.8221271110249495.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:10:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Gaurav Jain (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5759) IllegalArgumentException when CombineFileInputFormat is used as job InputFormat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856201#action_12856201 ] Gaurav Jain commented on HADOOP-5759: ------------------------------------- I am trying to use CombineFile* classes to use in Zebra. After this patch, it works for me, so far. However, I was wondering if somebody has done any performance analysis on CombineFile* vs InputFile* ( data locality vs ( non ) data-locality ) If so, can I have access to it? > IllegalArgumentException when CombineFileInputFormat is used as job InputFormat > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5759 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5759 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Fix For: 0.20.2, 0.21.0 > > Attachments: patch-5759-1.txt, patch-5759-2.txt, patch-5759.txt > > > As per my understanding, CombineFileInputFormat is creating splits with rackname as split location. > When I use CombineFileInputFormat as the InputFormat for job, job initialization fails with following exception : > 2009-04-28 14:10:40,162 ERROR mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener (EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:run(83)) - Job initialization failed: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Network location name contains /: /default-rack > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NodeBase.set(NodeBase.java:76) > at org.apache.hadoop.net.NodeBase.(NodeBase.java:57) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.addHostToNodeMapping(JobTracker.java:2342) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker.resolveAndAddToTopology(JobTracker.java:2336) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.createCache(JobInProgress.java:344) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress.initTasks(JobInProgress.java:441) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.EagerTaskInitializationListener$InitJob.run(EagerTaskInitializationListener.java:81) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > When I changed CombineFileInputFormat to pass just rackname (without '/'), JT wrongly resolves the node as /default-rack/. > Solution is to pass hostnames holding the block(on the rack), instead of rackname. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7351-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 12 23:41:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14768 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7360 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7316 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7308 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:41:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:41:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3CNepwV003011 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:40:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <16144898.9811271115651031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:40:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Propose some changes to FileContext In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856225#action_12856225 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Thanks for the review Hairong. Could you check out HDFS-1089 as well? It's simple, just removes uses of FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists from HDFS, which needs to be checked in before this patch. > Propose some changes to FileContext > ----------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7352-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:05:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36963 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 24275 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24251 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24243 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:05:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:05:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D04nt2003273 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:04:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9314864.10251271117089716.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:04:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856234#action_12856234 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- > This would be a pretty big change to the classification scheme that was argued out quite exhaustively in HADOOP-5073; there should be time for people to re-hash if they wish before anything is committed. I agree that people should have a chance to discuss this change. As the annotations begin to get more traction, it seems reasonable to be able to change them to make them better fit how they are actually being used. > If we're removing the limitation of who should use LimitedPrivate, and who can depend on it, then it's not really limited private anymore? The code that is annotated LimitedPrivate gets to declare who may use it, so in that sense it is still limited private, no? > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7353-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:07:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37735 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 24885 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24851 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24796 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1271.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:07:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D06oBX003310 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:06:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26652222.10331271117210074.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:06:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6580: ----------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7354-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:07:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37791 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 25023 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24984 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24976 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:07:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:07:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D06njW003298 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:06:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6690077.10291271117209475.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:06:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6580: ----------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6580.9.patch Patch updated to merge with latest trunk. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7355-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:09:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39511 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26073 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26029 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26021 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:09:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1271.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:09:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D08okb003335 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4566518.10391271117330510.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey updated HADOOP-6580: ----------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) HADOOP-6580.9.patch is submitted for hudson tests. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7356-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 00:24:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47422 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 31575 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31533 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31525 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:24:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1271.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:24:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D0NocE003519 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <14275127.10811271118230075.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Propose change to FileContext#listStatus In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856242#action_12856242 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6692: ------------------------------------- Hey Hairong, The patch looks good to me. Only one minor edit in addition to Suresh's comments: FileContext#listStatus will never throw UnresolvedLinkException so you can remove that from the throws clause and javadoc. Thanks, Eli > Propose change to FileContext#listStatus > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7357-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 03:00:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13119 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 03:00:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 03:00:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 29120 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 03:00:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29011 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 03:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29003 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 03:00:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:00:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1272.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:00:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D2xsKl005290 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6436930.13721271127594879.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:59:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856284#action_12856284 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- My viewpoint is in partial agreement with Doug and Eric: # Implement the pluggable RPC in trunk and it needs to be well tested (agree with Doug) # Implement the AVRO IDL based protocols in a branch(es). (agree with Eric). # Only after step 2 do we declare the new protocols to be wire compatible in future. (we are all in agreement here) # After step 1, leave the default to be current RPC - but any customer can easily change this by a config variable. (Disagree with Doug). There is low risk in #1 as it is pluggable. Moving to Avro IDL will change many data types in our servers and cannot be pluggable. This needs to be well tested (correctness and performance) and cannot cross releases; hence it is best done in a branch(es). HDFS and MR can be separate branches; however I don't think we can split the HDFS protocols as they use many common data types (block-id, block-token, etc). > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7358-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 05:03:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28266 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 05:03:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 05:03:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 91873 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 05:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91763 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 05:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91755 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 05:03:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:03:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:03:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D52smM006496 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <16356799.15441271134974402.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:02:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856303#action_12856303 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- Sanjay, I'm pleased to see we have so few differences. I leave for a one week vacation tomorrow morning, and look forward to working with you more on this when I return. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7359-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 05:15:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30295 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 94895 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94835 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94824 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:15:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1273.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:15:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3D5EsAw006655 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:14:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25341396.15821271135694902.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:14:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856304#action_12856304 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------- I think Sanjay's proposal is reasonable, and glad to see we are close to consensus on this important issue. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7360-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 13:37:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38010 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 13:37:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 13:37:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 49145 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 13:37:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49040 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 13:37:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49032 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 13:37:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:37:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:37:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DDar3j011237 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:36:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <16631073.24081271165813863.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:36:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Greg Wilkins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6528) Jetty returns -1 resulting in Hadoop masters / slaves to fail during startup. In-Reply-To: <2116312423.157761264936054577.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856423#action_12856423 ] Greg Wilkins commented on HADOOP-6528: -------------------------------------- I'm still pondering this one... and still can't think of an explanation other than something in hadoop is calling close. I've attached a patch to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-748 that changes the way localPort is handled: Instead of calling socket.getLocalPort() when connector.getLocalPort() is called, this patch calls socket.getLocalPort() in the open method and holds the result in a volatile int. If close is called, the int is set to -2, so this will tell us if the port has not been opened, or has been closed before it was used. This patch is not yet in a release, but if somebody has a setup where this problem occurs, then we can produce a snapshot build for you to test against. > Jetty returns -1 resulting in Hadoop masters / slaves to fail during startup. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6528 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6528 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala > Attachments: jetty-server-failure.log > > > A recent test failure on Hudson seems to indicate that Jetty's Server.getConnectors()[0].getLocalPort() is returning -1 in the HttpServer.getPort() method. When this happens, Hadoop masters / slaves that use Jetty fail to startup correctly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7361-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 17:33:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39718 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1900 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1767 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1734 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:44:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:43:59 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DGhbAu015927 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:43:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11723633.34461271177017775.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:43:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1722) Make streaming to handle non-utf8 byte array MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856491#action_12856491 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-1722: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #285 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/285/]) MAPREDUCE-889. binary communication formats added to Streaming by HADOOP-1722 should be documented. Contributed by Klaas Bosteels. > Make streaming to handle non-utf8 byte array > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-1722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Runping Qi > Assignee: Klaas Bosteels > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-1722-branch-0.18.patch, HADOOP-1722-branch-0.19.patch, HADOOP-1722-v0.20.1.patch, HADOOP-1722-v2.patch, HADOOP-1722-v3.patch, HADOOP-1722-v4.patch, HADOOP-1722-v4.patch, HADOOP-1722-v5.patch, HADOOP-1722-v6.patch, HADOOP-1722.patch > > > Right now, the streaming framework expects the output sof the steam process (mapper or reducer) are line > oriented UTF-8 text. This limit makes it impossible to use those programs whose outputs may be non-UTF-8 > (international encoding, or maybe even binary data). Streaming can overcome this limit by introducing a simple > encoding protocol. For example, it can allow the mapper/reducer to hexencode its keys/values, > the framework decodes them in the Java side. > This way, as long as the mapper/reducer executables follow this encoding protocol, > they can output arabitary bytearray and the streaming framework can handle them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7362-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:19:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66160 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 62573 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62459 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62449 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:52:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:52:23 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DGq1lZ016965 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:52:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1967560.37611271177521152.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:52:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856492#action_12856492 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6689: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7363-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:39:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17937 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 87100 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87075 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87067 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1277.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:38 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DH2Is1018287 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6754793.41601271178138265.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:02:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6689: ------------------------------------ Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7364-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:41:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25633 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 92496 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92466 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92458 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:04:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1277.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:04:21 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DH41KK018408 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:04:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20409538.41921271178241368.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:04:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6689: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Resolution: Fixed I committed the patch. Thank you Eli. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7365-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:52:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61536 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10016 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9990 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9982 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:10:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1277.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:10:42 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DHAMXi019306 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:10:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <33296145.44351271178622255.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:10:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6689) Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest In-Reply-To: <1987122042.47681270660714756.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856503#action_12856503 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6689: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #217 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/217/]) HADOOP-6689. Add directory renaming test to existing FileContext tests. Contributed by Eli Collins. > Add directory renaming test to FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6689 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6689 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6689-1.patch, hadoop-6689-2.patch > > > I noticed FileContextMainOperationsBaseTest does not have a test that renames an empty directory to an empty directory (and shows that this fails without the overwrite option). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7366-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 18:55:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89977 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 28572 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28552 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28544 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:15:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:15:35 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DHFDQH019814 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:15:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <426140.45751271178913376.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:15:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7367-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 19:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25382 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69329 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69293 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69285 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:41:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1278.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:41:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DHfSRM023245 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:41:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <27363908.51701271180488589.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:41:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856512#action_12856512 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------------- If we can get to agreement that the current RPC remains the default and that IDL work happens in a branch and that only after we have a reasonably complete backwards compat solution do we change to AVRO RPC by default, then I think we are good. My concern is not with the already committed plugability, but with the change of the default RPC and incremental change over of the protocols. Once that work starts, we are committed to finishing it and we can not do that in the timeframe of the next release IMO. I'd love to be proven wrong in a branch... Would we keep the plugable API once we make the transition? Seems like plugable support of an IDL driven RPC will be hard / not valuable. Thoughts? > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7368-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 19:27:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48919 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 81280 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81247 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81239 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:47:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1278.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:47:41 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DHlKlX024363 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23089091.52971271180840969.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:47:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856513#action_12856513 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------- Is this ready to be committed? > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7369-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 20:56:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64604 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 82351 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82319 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82311 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1280.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:56:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DKtsNC009013 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21947133.72601271192154792.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7370-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 20:56:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64683 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 82505 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82472 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82464 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:56:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:56:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DKtsAO009004 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <22557697.72571271192154154.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7371-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 21:04:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75334 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 2471 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2442 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2431 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:04:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:04:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DL3qKP009188 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3004506.72901271192632679.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701.patch Attaching patch to fix exit codes for {{fs -ch(own/mod/grp)}}. Patch includes unit tests for theses issues. This patch does not fix bug for incorrect exit code when wild card input is given to the {{fs -ch(own/mod/grp)}}. There is bug in {{FsShell.java}} which causes incorrect exit codes when wildcard inputs are given to -ch* commands. {code:title=Bar.java|borderStyle=solid} for (int i=startIndex; i Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7372-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 21:10:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81223 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 21:10:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 21:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 12815 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:10:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12745 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:10:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12612 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 21:10:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:10:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:10:23 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DLA175009358 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30954625.73221271193001806.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:10:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6702) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6702 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0, 0.19.1 Reporter: Ravi Phulari Assignee: Ravi Phulari Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Currently incorrect exit codes are given for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. This bug is due to missing update of errors count in {{FsShell.java}}. {code:title=FsShell.java|borderStyle=solid} int runCmdHandler(CmdHandler handler, String[] args, int startIndex, boolean recursive) throws IOException { int errors = 0; for (int i=startIndex; i Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35424 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 45606 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45582 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45574 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:36:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1281.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:36:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DLZpF9009952 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:35:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:35:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself ------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.22.0 Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7374-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 21:50:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68246 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 63656 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63623 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63615 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:50:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:50:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DLnnOi010391 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:49:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <17194546.76151271195389942.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:49:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6703: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6703-1.patch Patch attached. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7375-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:12:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23722 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 89944 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89918 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 89907 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1281.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMBpDf012902 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31038474.77701271196711062.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7376-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:12:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23747 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 90105 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90051 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90043 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1281.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMBpx8012914 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30805710.77741271196711420.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Affects Version/s: 0.22.0 > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7377-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:12:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23958 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 90285 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90195 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90181 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMBoBk012889 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30245278.77661271196710164.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6563-2.patch Fixes the javadoc warning. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7378-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:12:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24010 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 90966 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90922 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90874 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:12:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:12:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMBpn2012908 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5465276.77721271196711249.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:11:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7379-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:20:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42202 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:20:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1857 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1829 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1821 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:20:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1281.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:20:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMJp2Q013865 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:19:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19417201.78041271197191331.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:19:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856655#action_12856655 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6580: ---------------------------------------------- test-patch results [exec] +1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7380-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 22:20:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42390 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 2112 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2083 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2075 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:20:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:20:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DMJrOX013892 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:19:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25450725.78111271197193769.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:19:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856657#action_12856657 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6580: ---------------------------------------------- ant test also ran successfully. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7381-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 23:18:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97375 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 58862 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58822 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58814 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1282.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:18:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DNHoHl018127 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <18417308.80631271200670196.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:17:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-6580: ----------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Resolution: Fixed committed this. Thanks Jitendra. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7382-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 13 23:22:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1671 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 63092 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63026 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63014 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:22:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:22:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DNLqhr018195 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:21:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9190855.80771271200912913.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:21:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6580) UGI should contain authentication method. In-Reply-To: <1786976638.415521266712107907.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856683#action_12856683 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6580: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #218 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/218/]) HADOOP-6580. UGI should contain authentication method. > UGI should contain authentication method. > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6580 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6580 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: c-6580.patch, HADOOP-6580-0_20.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.1.patch, HADOOP-6580.2.patch, HADOOP-6580.3.patch, HADOOP-6580.4.patch, HADOOP-6580.5.patch, HADOOP-6580.6.patch, HADOOP-6580.7.patch, HADOOP-6580.8.patch, HADOOP-6580.9.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation should contain authentication method in its subject. This will be used in HDFS to issue delegation tokens only to kerberos authenticated clients. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7383-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 03:06:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18989 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 03:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 03:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 22925 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:06:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22814 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22806 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 03:06:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:06:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1283.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:06:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E35qfm012770 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9346772.90011271214352565.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:05:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856732#action_12856732 ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------------------- The patch applies even after a long time. *smile* Running through hudson again. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7384-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 03:08:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19177 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 03:08:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23146 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23080 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23071 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1283.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E37q6b020031 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <29898453.90251271214472549.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6439-6.patch Re-submitting the same patch for Hudson. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7385-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 03:08:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19232 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 23270 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23220 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23212 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E37pia019992 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <17970817.90121271214471313.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7386-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 03:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19249 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 23399 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23352 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23344 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1283.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:08:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E37skU020070 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30160009.90381271214474283.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7387-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 06:01:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59759 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 06:01:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 27316 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27200 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27192 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1284.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:01:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E60suB022400 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:00:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12424868.95681271224854158.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:00:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7388-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 06:01:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59819 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27386 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27354 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27346 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:01:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:01:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E60tCv022433 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:00:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9779708.95791271224855465.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:00:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7389-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 08:27:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43976 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 08:27:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 08:27:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 65720 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 08:27:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65608 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 08:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65599 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 08:27:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:27:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1284.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:27:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3E8Qp3l026361 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:26:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <32604308.104881271233611247.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:26:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856796#action_12856796 ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------------------- The Hudson result doesn't seem to be posting here. The result is as below: {noformat} [exec] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [exec] Total time: 7 seconds [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] [exec] +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment [exec] http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441685/HADOOP-6439-6.patch [exec] against trunk revision 933810. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. [exec] [exec] +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. [exec] [exec] Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/462/testReport/ [exec] Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/462/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html [exec] Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/462/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html [exec] Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/462/console [exec] {noformat} > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7390-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 15:18:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19372 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 15:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 15:18:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 87375 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:18:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87350 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:18:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87342 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 15:18:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:18:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:18:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EFHmR0006224 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:17:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org add support for Parascale filesystem ------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6704 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Neil Bliss Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7391-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 15:46:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42837 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 15:46:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 15:46:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 59787 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:46:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59749 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59716 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 15:46:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:46:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1287.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:46:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EFjsLW006795 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13986423.116831271259954541.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:45:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856935#action_12856935 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6704: ------------------------------------- Seems like it should go in o.a.h.fs with the other non-hdfs file systems if it's going to be actively maintained. Will need some unit tests to help prevent people from breaking it since hudson doesn't have a parascale backend. > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7392-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 15:48:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44500 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 64948 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64896 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64824 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1287.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:48:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3EFloVA006842 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:47:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4088062.116921271260070920.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:47:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856937#action_12856937 ] Neil Bliss commented on HADOOP-6704: ------------------------------------ ok, patch forthcoming shortly. > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7393-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 23:11:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16041 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 90196 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90104 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90088 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 23:11:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:11:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:11:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3ENAmM4012275 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:10:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:10:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira --------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6705 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] Adding comment to Jira. [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] ====================================================================== [exec] [exec] [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7394-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 23:31:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30971 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 7619 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7507 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7499 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:31:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1290.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:31:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3ENUm7t012452 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:30:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1788317.127991271287848814.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:30:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6705: --------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6705.PATCH I ve configured a different version of jira cli that works with the current jira version. This patch would help the test-patch script to work with the new jiracli > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7395-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 14 23:33:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33861 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 12469 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12439 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12431 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:33:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1290.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:33:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3ENWoEE012468 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:32:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <14933500.128021271287970555.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:32:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857147#action_12857147 ] Giridharan Kesavan commented on HADOOP-6705: -------------------------------------------- this patch cant be tested with test-patch. This is not going to change the current build system except for that it would be using a different version of jiracli. > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7396-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 00:34:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75437 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 52878 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52844 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52834 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:34:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1290.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:34:24 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F0Y3fh012913 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:34:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19329091.128961271291643642.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:34:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6706) Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved -------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: security Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Devaraj Das Assignee: Devaraj Das Fix For: 0.22.0 Currently, the relogin in the RPC client happens on only a SaslException. But we have seen cases where other exceptions are thrown (like IllegalStateException when the client's ticket is invalid). This jira is to fix that behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7397-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 00:42:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79478 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 58797 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58759 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58751 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:42:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F0fn1J013085 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:41:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23627497.129461271292109748.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:41:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6706) Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved In-Reply-To: <19329091.128961271291643642.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6706: -------------------------------- Attachment: 6706.bp20.patch Attaching a patch for the Y20 branch. "Exception" is caught and a relogin is attempted. We were debating whether to have relogin done outside the exception block before doing a saslConnect. But even in that case, we need to be able to handle exceptions since some other thread might be currently using the subject credentials that we are just about to destroy (in relogin) and that thread should retry the connection after a relogin. In any case the exception handling is required. > Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6706 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6706.bp20.patch > > > Currently, the relogin in the RPC client happens on only a SaslException. But we have seen cases where other exceptions are thrown (like IllegalStateException when the client's ticket is invalid). This jira is to fix that behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7398-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 02:04:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 826 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7219 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7211 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:04:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:04:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F23pYB013994 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31930877.131071271297031100.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:03:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6369) add Grid Engine support to HOD In-Reply-To: <1501134231.1257939999839.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857179#action_12857179 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6369: ----------------------------------- +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/42/console > add Grid Engine support to HOD > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/hod > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Simone Leo > Attachments: HADOOP-6369.patch, hod_ge.patch > > > At [CRS4, Distributed Computing Group|http://dc.crs4.it], we developed and tested a simple patch that adds Grid Engine support to HOD. Since porting HOD to SGE is listed in the [Project Suggestions page|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSuggestions], we decided to share the patch with the community. After patching, HOD passes all unit tests at our site, and we tested the SGE driver on a production cluster consisting of about 400 nodes. The patch should preserve Torque functionality, although we were not able to test this on production. > *NOTE*: the patch is for the official hadoop-0.20.1 HOD release. It should be easy, however, to generate patches for other versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7399-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 03:22:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38000 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 03:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 03:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 64676 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 03:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64556 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 03:22:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64542 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 03:22:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:22:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1290.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:22:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F3LniE014481 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1959997.131731271301709476.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:21:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857184#action_12857184 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6705: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #220 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/220/]) HADOOP-6705. Fix to work with 1.5 version of jiracli > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7400-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 03:46:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42957 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 03:46:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 03:46:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 74720 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 03:46:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74618 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 03:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74610 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 03:46:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:46:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:46:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F3jrH8014606 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <17485232.131921271303153426.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:45:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6369) add Grid Engine support to HOD In-Reply-To: <1501134231.1257939999839.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857186#action_12857186 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6369: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12424727/HADOOP-6369.patch against trunk revision 934273. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/43/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/43/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/43/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/43/console This message is automatically generated. > add Grid Engine support to HOD > ------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6369 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/hod > Affects Versions: 0.20.1, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Simone Leo > Attachments: HADOOP-6369.patch, hod_ge.patch > > > At [CRS4, Distributed Computing Group|http://dc.crs4.it], we developed and tested a simple patch that adds Grid Engine support to HOD. Since porting HOD to SGE is listed in the [Project Suggestions page|http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ProjectSuggestions], we decided to share the patch with the community. After patching, HOD passes all unit tests at our site, and we tested the SGE driver on a production cluster consisting of about 400 nodes. The patch should preserve Torque functionality, although we were not able to test this on production. > *NOTE*: the patch is for the official hadoop-0.20.1 HOD release. It should be easy, however, to generate patches for other versions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7401-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 06:49:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11256 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 06:49:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 06:49:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13028 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 06:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12914 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 06:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12903 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 06:49:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:49:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1291.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:49:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3F6mnQv016705 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <6671890.134011271314129577.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:48:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ruyue Ma (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6707) BlockDecompressorStream.resetState() has a bug, which often causes the block decompressing not to work. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 BlockDecompressorStream.resetState() has a bug, which often causes the block decompressing not to work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6707 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6707 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: io Reporter: Ruyue Ma Assignee: Ruyue Ma Fix For: 0.21.0 BlockDecompressorStream.resetState() has a bug. The method of resetState() doesn't reinit the two member variables(int originalBlockSize; int noUncompressedBytes) of Class BlockDecompressorStream. This bug will cause the block decompressing not to work. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7402-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 15:51:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66646 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 15:51:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 15:51:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 18423 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 15:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18259 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 15:51:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18248 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 15:51:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:51:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1294.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:51:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FFoqZe022716 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:50:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25947545.142741271346652661.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857361#action_12857361 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6704: ---------------------------------------- # This is a new feature, so the patch should be against SVN_HEAD, not an older version of Hadoop. # The newer version of Hadoop is moving to some new FS APIs; you might want to consider working with them. # HDFS-708 has discussed the issue of stress testing filesystems; this new filesystem back end could be a use case, if you are willing to participate. # One issue with all third party filesystems is regression testing: they don't get enough of it. If there is any way to make this easier \-and that could include you running a local version of Hudson to grab SVN_HEAD of Hadoop and testing MR jobs over your filestore, then end users will be grateful. # Involvement in testing forthcoming releases is equally important, as is ongoing maintenance. It is really hard for an OSS project to test/maintain code that works with other peoples infrastructure, and motivation can be trouble too, so you have to be willing to stay involved -otherwise the code just gradually stops working. > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7403-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 16:37:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79616 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 16:37:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 16:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 95230 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95170 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 16:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95162 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 16:37:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:37:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:37:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FGapvG023323 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:36:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25695093.144231271349411628.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:36:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857393#action_12857393 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6705: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #287 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/287/]) HADOOP-6705. Fix to work with 1.5 version of jiracli > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7404-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 21:59:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77322 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 21:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 51683 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51633 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51624 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:59:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1296.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:59:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FLwp1j027368 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:58:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1679892.152781271368731460.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:58:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6692: -------------------------------- Summary: Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator (was: Propose change to FileContext#listStatus) > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7405-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 21:59:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77377 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 21:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 51839 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51780 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51767 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 21:59:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:59:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:59:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FLwoUT027353 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:58:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31341801.152731271368730600.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:58:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6678: -------------------------------- Summary: Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists (was: Propose some changes to FileContext) > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7406-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:11:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35189 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 68357 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68248 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68227 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:11:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1296.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:11:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMAn1k027483 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <8355863.153081271369449816.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:10:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6657) Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 In-Reply-To: <74469463.448561269390627214.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857566#action_12857566 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6657: ---------------------------------------- I've just checked in the change, but JIRA isn't giving me permission to work on the issue, to mark it as fixed. > Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6657 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6657-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v2.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v3.patch > > > Common portion of the MAPREDUCE-1545. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7407-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:21:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80372 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 78626 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78598 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78590 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:21:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:21:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMKqYQ027607 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:20:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:20:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 New file format for very large records -------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6708 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: io Reporter: Aaron Kimball Assignee: Aaron Kimball A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7408-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:23:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85219 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 81713 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81666 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81658 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:18 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMMuD1027735 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13709801.153851271370176868.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6657) Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 In-Reply-To: <74469463.448561269390627214.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857576#action_12857576 ] Hudson commented on HADOOP-6657: -------------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit #221 (See [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Common-trunk-Commit/221/]) HADOOP-6657. Add a capitalization method to StringUtils for MAPREDUCE-1545 > Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6657 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6657-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v2.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v3.patch > > > Common portion of the MAPREDUCE-1545. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7409-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:23:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85304 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 81944 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81909 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81901 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:20 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMMwtc027774 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <15840001.153981271370178769.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-6708: ---------------------------------- Attachment: lobfile.pdf > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7410-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:23:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85331 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 82071 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82043 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81991 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:23:19 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMMwBW027768 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <27206252.153961271370178521.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:22:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857578#action_12857578 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- In working on Sqoop, I need to import records which may be several gigabytes in size each. I require a file format that allows me to store these records in an efficient, grouped fashion. Users may then want to open a file containing many such records and partially-read individual records, but still access subsequent records efficiently. I'm attaching to this issue a proposal for a _LobFile_ format which will store these large objects. (The basis for this work surrounds import of BLOB and CLOB-typed columns.) The specification proposal analyzes available file formats and my understanding of why they aren't appropriate here. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7411-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 22:25:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89545 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 22:25:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 22:25:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 86416 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:25:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86372 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 22:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86364 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 22:25:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:25:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:25:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FMOoRM027800 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:24:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19178489.154041271370290333.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:24:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857580#action_12857580 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- Please review the attached proposal. This will serve as a basis to foment discussion; hopefully we can arrive at a conclusion as to how to best implement this need. Some still-open points are listed at the end of the document. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7412-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:11:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77994 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26854 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26773 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26765 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:11:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNAoha028047 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:10:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9122855.154341271373050801.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:10:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Gaurav Jain (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4565) MultiFileInputSplit can use data locality information to create splits MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857586#action_12857586 ] Gaurav Jain commented on HADOOP-4565: ------------------------------------- Did you happen to hit the following issue after this jiras changes? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-347 Looks like I am hitting this issue. I am running some more benchmarks to trace down the details. > MultiFileInputSplit can use data locality information to create splits > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4565 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4565 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: CombineMultiFile.patch, CombineMultiFile2.patch, CombineMultiFile3.patch, CombineMultiFile4.patch, CombineMultiFile5.patch, CombineMultiFile7.patch, CombineMultiFile8.patch, CombineMultiFile9.patch, TestCombine.txt > > > The MultiFileInputFormat takes a set of paths and creates splits based on file sizes. Each splits contains a few files an each split are roughly equal in size. It would be efficient if we can extend this InputFormat to create splits such each all the blocks in one split and either node-local or rack-local. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7413-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:17:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80022 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 31457 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31426 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31418 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:17:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:17:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNGnnd028098 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <28677223.154481271373409459.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:16:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D128= 57588#action_12857588 ]=20 Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- bq. Shortcomings of TFile:=20 bq. =E2=80=A2 Length =EF=AC=81elds are encoded as integers, not longs. This= does not support records > 2 GB.=20 This is an intentional restriction. All integers are in VInt/VLong format w= hich is fully wire compatible. You can easily make a case to request such l= imit be lifted. bq. =E2=80=A2 The expected length of the value must be precisely-known or w= ritten as -1. I have records where I have a minimum bound on their size (mo= re precisely: Ahead of time, I know their length in characters but not in b= ytes), but not necessarily a more precise byte count value. A goal of this = format is the ability to ef=EF=AC=81ciently partially-read a character stre= am-oriented record, then skip quickly to the next record. The format I prop= ose will allow you to specify that a record is at least a certain length. T= hat way you can ef=EF=AC=81ciently skip most of a record and then search fo= r a synchronization boundary after that. (Since I expect most characters to= be encoded in a single byte, but not necessarily all of them.)=20 Even if you do not know the length of the record you write (namely specifyi= ng -1 during writing), you can still efficiently skip a record (even after = partially consuming some bytes of the record). Isn't it sufficient for your= case? Searching for a synchronization boundary is very inefficient than le= ngth-prefixed encoding. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy = disk access --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: htt= ps://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7414-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:41:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85406 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 60151 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60109 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60101 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:41:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:41:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNenMu028259 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11903376.154751271374849451.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:40:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6709) Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: fs Reporter: Tom White Assignee: Tom White Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.21.0 To make the FileSystem API in the 0.21 release (which should be treated as a minor release) compatible with 0.20 the deprecated methods removed in HADOOP-4779 need to be re-instated. They should still be marked as deprecated, however. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7415-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:57:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89019 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70612 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70583 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70575 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:57:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:57:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:57:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNunS9028373 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:56:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with linux ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6710 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7416-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:59:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89631 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 74916 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74876 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74868 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:59:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNwn8g028393 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30232174.155051271375929165.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:58:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with linux In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857600#action_12857600 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6710: ----------------------------------------- Snippet from the posix specification http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/utilities/umask.html: For a symbolic_mode value, the new value of the file mode creation mask shall be the logical complement of the file permission bits portion of the file mode specified by the symbolic_mode string. In a symbolic_mode value, the permissions op characters '+' and '-' shall be interpreted relative to the current file mode creation mask; '+' shall cause the bits for the indicated permissions to be cleared in the mask; '-' shall cause the bits for the indicated permissions to be set in the mask. The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified. In the octal integer form of mode, the specified bits are set in the file mode creation mask. The file mode creation mask shall be set to the resulting numeric value. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with linux > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7417-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 15 23:59:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89676 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75046 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75011 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75003 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:59:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:59:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3FNwpNH028432 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20779928.155181271375931795.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:58:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6710: ------------------------------------ Summary: Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix (was: Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with linux) Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 0.22.0 > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7418-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:11:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93397 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82142 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82118 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82076 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:11:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0AoXd028556 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:10:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <32032177.155531271376650748.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:10:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D128= 57609#action_12857609 ]=20 Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- Hong, bq. * Length =EF=AC=81elds are encoded as integers, not longs. This does no= t support records > 2 GB. bq. This is an intentional restriction. All integers are in VInt/VLong form= at which is fully wire compatible. You can easily make a case to request su= ch limit be lifted. So does this mean that the API for TFile could be changed without complicat= ion to accept/return {{long}} values? I read the TFile spec and it points o= ut in several different locations the 2 GB value limit. By reading that, it= sounds as though other aspects of TFile may break based on the assumed int= eger size there. bq. Even if you do not know the length of the record you write (namely spec= ifying -1 during writing), you can still efficiently skip a record (even af= ter partially consuming some bytes of the record). Isn't it sufficient for = your case? Searching for a synchronization boundary is very inefficient tha= n length-prefixed encoding. Data comes to me from JDBC through an InputStream or a Reader that I am not= sure how long it is. I read from that InputStream/Reader and write its con= tents into an OutputStream/Writer that dumps into a file (LobFile). In the = case where I have a character-based Reader, I know how many characters I ha= ve, which is a lower bound on the number of bytes, but not exact. So my pl= an was to seek ahead by that much, then search for the boundary. Assuming m= ost characters are one byte, the search will be pretty quick. How does TFile support length skipping if you don't pre-declare the lengths= ? > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy = disk access --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: htt= ps://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7419-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:27:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4779 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:27:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:27:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 95375 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:27:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95341 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95333 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:27:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:27:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:27:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0Qpov028877 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:26:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26425966.155701271377611333.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:26:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6521.patch Changes in the patch: # Symbolic and octal umask mode was added configurable with param name "dfs.umaskmode". It deprecates the old param "dfs.umask". Previously for backward compatibility new deprecation mechanism introduced in 0.21 was used. This mechanism is useful when a config param name changes, to map the old config name to the new. However in case of umask, the semantics of the param also changes. Old param expects decimal value and the new param expects symbolic or octal value. The deprecation mechanism in addition to mapping old to new names, must also translated the old value to new value. Given the lack of this capability, umask will no longer use config deprecation mechanism. # Following changes from 0.20 version of the patch is carried forward, with the exception of test changes. Test changes are needed in HDFS. I will created a separate jira for that. {quote} 1. To ensure backward compatibility, when applications use the old key "dfs.umask" and the server default has "dfs.umaskmode", old key overrides the new key. That is first the old key is used for getting umask and then the new key. 2. FsPermission.setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) currently has a bug. When setting the "dfs.umaskmode" param in the configuration, it should convert the umask decimal value to octal. {quote} > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7420-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:33:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8778 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 99770 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99741 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99733 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:33:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:33:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0XQZd000426 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11650152.81271378006338.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:33:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857620#action_12857620 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- bq. So does this mean that the API for TFile could be changed without complication to accept/return long values? yes, if by "complication" you mean wire compatibility. You may also need to remove the checks for length violations in various places. Note that there is still a key length restriction of 64KB. bq. How does TFile support length skipping if you don't pre-declare the lengths? it uses chunk encoding. The whole value stream is encoded with a chain of chunks. We use an internal buffer to accumulate small writes and once full, flush out the buffer as one chunk. Each chunk is length prefixed. All but the terminal chunk have their lengths written out as negative integers. The chunk size is controlled by parameter "tfile.io.chunk.size" (default to 1MB). When skipping, it skips chunk by chunk. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7421-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:39:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 11684 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:39:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:39:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 2998 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:39:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2968 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2959 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:39:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:39:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:39:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0dRb8008644 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <23833185.161271378367151.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:39:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857621#action_12857621 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- I don't think that works in this scenario. Suppose I have a record that is 8 GB long; I read the first kilobyte or two out of the record, then intend to discard the rest and start with the next record. If we have a chunk size of 1 MB, then skipping through this will require 8000 seeks, or ~64000 milliseconds. Even upping this chunk size drastically to 100 MB means a 640 ms delay. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7422-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:43:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12207 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5196 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5154 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5146 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:43:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:43:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0hPqH012503 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:43:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20866272.181271378605113.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:43:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6709) Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 In-Reply-To: <11903376.154751271374849451.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6709: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6709.patch Patch to re-instate the removed methods. No extra tests. > Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6709 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6709.patch > > > To make the FileSystem API in the 0.21 release (which should be treated as a minor release) compatible with 0.20 the deprecated methods removed in HADOOP-4779 need to be re-instated. They should still be marked as deprecated, however. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7423-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 00:53:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15356 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10420 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10368 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10360 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:53:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:53:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G0rRjB025584 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:53:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26218954.391271379207293.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:53:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857627#action_12857627 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- bq. I don't think that works in this scenario. Suppose I have a record that is 8 GB long; I read the first kilobyte or two out of the record, then intend to discard the rest and start with the next record. Your analysis is almost right. However, there is one optimization could be done to support this: TFile does block compression, and an 8GB record is likely to exceed the TFIle block size after compression (unless you have something like all zeros). So it would be the last record in the block. And we can speed up the skipping of the last record in a block by positioning the cursor to the beginning of the next block without chunk decoding. On the other hand, if your 8GB actually compresses very well within one TFile block (256KB by default), then it is really a sequential read of 256KB from HDFS. >From your description, it seems that you do not plan to use compression, which sounds a bit surprising to me... > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7424-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:21:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22066 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 32806 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32756 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32748 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:21:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:21:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1LPCP000826 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:21:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11754477.861271380885955.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:21:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857635#action_12857635 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- I'm not sure what you mean by this optimization. Can you please explain further? What's the relationship between "blocks" and "chunks" in a TFile? It sounds like a record can span multiple chunks. Is a record fully contained in a block? If it compresses an 8 GB record down to, say, 2 GB, will that still require skipping chunk-wise through the compressed data? I do plan on using compression. Given the very large record lengths I'm designing for, I expect that it's acceptable to compress each record individually. The current writeup doesn't propose how to handle compression elegantly. But I'm leaning toward writing out a table of compressed record lengths at the end of the file. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7425-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:23:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22337 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 33440 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33408 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 33400 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:23:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:23:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1NQuG000864 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:23:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5738194.961271381006602.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:23:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857637#action_12857637 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- Also how does TFile handle splits and resynchronizing? It doesn't seem like there's an InputFormat for it. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7426-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:37:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23332 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 36052 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:37:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36017 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:37:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36007 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:37:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:37:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1297.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:37:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1bPMt000933 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:37:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20841992.1101271381845967.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:37:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857639#action_12857639 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- bq. What's the relationship between "blocks" and "chunks" in a TFile? A TFile contains zero or more compressed blocks. Each block contains sequences of key, value, key, value. Each value can contain 1 to more chunks. A block has a minimum size of 256KB. Whenever we accumulate enough data that exceeds the minimum block size, we "close" the current block and starts a new block. All blocks have their offsets and lengths recorded in some index section. bq. Is a record fully contained in a block? Yes. bq. If it compresses an 8 GB record down to, say, 2 GB, will that still require skipping chunk-wise through the compressed data? No, because it would be the last record in that block. With my suggested optimization, it would be an O(1) operation to skip that record. bq. Also how does TFile handle splits and resynchronizing? It doesn't seem like there's an InputFormat for it. Writing an input format for it is pretty easy, I believe Owen has a prototype of OFile on top of TFile on his laptop. :) Generally, you would extend from FileInputFormat, and your record reader would be backed up by a TFile.Reader.Scanner created by TFile.Reader.createScannerByByteRange(long offset, long length). Internally, this method would move the bytes range to the boundary of TFile compression blocks (through the block index it maintains). > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7427-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:57:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26964 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 49361 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49249 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49240 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1vQ0C001083 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <25374898.1431271383046934.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6668.patch New patch which makes classes in io.compress Evolving (not Stable) since several classes made incompatible changes to constructors between 0.20 and trunk (to be 0.21) by throwing IOException (in 0.20 they don't throw an exception). Similarly util.GenericOptionsParser is now Evolving since its constructors now throw IOException. I've marked the security classes as Evolving too. It's likely some could be marked as private or limited-private, but I didn't know which ones. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7428-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:57:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26994 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 49488 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49388 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49380 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1vRBR001104 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11753629.1501271383047957.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7429-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 01:57:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27074 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 01:57:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 49564 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49529 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49517 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 01:57:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:57:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G1vSCA001125 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20540659.1571271383048605.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:57:28 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7430-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 02:15:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31110 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 67647 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67626 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67618 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:15:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:15:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G2FPLT001249 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:15:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5668055.1791271384125882.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:15:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857651#action_12857651 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441908/HADOOP-6668.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/463/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/463/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/463/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/463/console This message is automatically generated. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7431-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 06:33:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18735 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 8328 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 06:33:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8200 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 06:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8191 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 06:33:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:33:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1298.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:33:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3G6XOJa003054 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:33:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26101198.3701271399604546.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:33:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Amar Kamat (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6711) Configuration should support list of values MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Configuration should support list of values ------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6711 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Components: conf Reporter: Amar Kamat Configuration supports 2 operations namely _set()_ and _get()_. It would be nice to have an inbuild support for lists where there can be multiple values (i.e list of values) assigned to one key. A workaround could be {code} // Assume Key be the parameter key and newValue be the value to be added/appended Configuration c = new Configuration(); String value = c.get(Key); value = value + " " + newValue c.set(Key, value); {code} One common usecase is that in a production enviroment, some user facing params (e.g mapred.child.java.opts) are set to default values (say for performance reasons). Users themselves might want to *add* to this list. Doing a set would overwrite the previous values. The above mentioned hack is doable via code but not via command line. Hence we need the framework to support lists. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7432-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 15:51:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6673 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 15:51:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 15:51:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 44361 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 15:51:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44324 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 15:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44315 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 15:51:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1300.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:51:06 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GFokno004966 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <28312042.12461271433046220.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:50:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6702) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. In-Reply-To: <30954625.73221271193001806.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857862#action_12857862 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-6702: -------------------------------------- Incorrect return code for wildcard in hadoop is not limited to chown/chgrp. It's everywhere. For example, In 'ls', this is how unix performs, {noformat} % ls nonexist* ls: No match. % echo $? 1 % ls nonexist* file* fileA % echo $? 0 % ls file* nonexist* fileA % echo $? 0 {noformat} *It returns 0 as long as one of the globing matches*. and in hadoop 'ls' {noformat} % hadoop dfs -ls file\* nonexist\* Found 1 items -rw------- 3 knoguchi users 7 2010-04-08 15:57 /user/knoguchi/fileA ls: Cannot access nonexist*: No such file or directory. % echo $? 255 % hadoop dfs -ls nonexist\* file\* ls: Cannot access nonexist*: No such file or directory. Found 1 items -rw------- 3 knoguchi users 7 2010-04-08 15:57 /user/knoguchi/fileA % echo $? 0 % {noformat} hadoop 'ls' simply returns the result of the last globbing. This behavior is also inconsistent from command to command. Picking three hadoop commands. chgrp/ls/du. || command || single globbing || multiple globbing || | chown/chgrp/etc | X (returns 0 even if globing returns empty) | X (returns 0 even if all the globbing returns empty) | | ls | O | X (returns last globbing result) | | du | O | X (returns non-zero even if one of the globbing fail) | Suggested fix in this Jira would simply change the behavior of 'chown/chgrp' to 'du'-like which means multiple globbing will still be incorrect. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6702 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > Currently incorrect exit codes are given for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" when input is given in wildcard format. > This bug is due to missing update of errors count in {{FsShell.java}}. > {code:title=FsShell.java|borderStyle=solid} > int runCmdHandler(CmdHandler handler, String[] args, > int startIndex, boolean recursive) > throws IOException { > int errors = 0; > > for (int i=startIndex; i Path srcPath = new Path(args[i]); > FileSystem srcFs = srcPath.getFileSystem(getConf()); > Path[] paths = FileUtil.stat2Paths(srcFs.globStatus(srcPath), srcPath); > for(Path path : paths) { > try { > FileStatus file = srcFs.getFileStatus(path); > if (file == null) { > System.err.println(handler.getName() + > ": could not get status for '" + path + "'"); > errors++; > } else { > errors += runCmdHandler(handler, file, srcFs, recursive); > } > } catch (IOException e) { > String msg = (e.getMessage() != null ? e.getLocalizedMessage() : > (e.getCause().getMessage() != null ? > e.getCause().getLocalizedMessage() : "null")); > System.err.println(handler.getName() + ": could not get status for '" > + path + "': " + msg.split("\n")[0]); > errors++; > } > } > } > {code} > If there are no files on HDFS matching to wildcard input then {{srcFs.globStatus(srcpath)}} returns 0. > {{ Path[] paths = FileUtil.stat2Paths(srcFs.globStatus(srcPath), srcPath);}} > Resulting no increment in {{errors}} and command exits with 0 even though file/directory does not exist. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7433-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:02:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41227 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 87718 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87667 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:02:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87659 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:02:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:02:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:02:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GI2Px1005986 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:02:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3326377.14401271440945812.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:02:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6710: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6710.patch Attached patch: # Adds support for posix compliant symbolic umask support with extensive tests # Current symbolic umask of format "u=,g=,o=" is not parsed correctly. This should be same as octal umask 777. Changing the regex to support this. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7434-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:06:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42300 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 93407 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93383 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93375 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:06:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:06:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GI6Qvq006011 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12392505.14451271441186078.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6711) Configuration should support list of values In-Reply-To: <26101198.3701271399604546.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857913#action_12857913 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6711: ----------------------------------- A word of caution: the proposed implementation using string concatenation is inefficient when a user wants to add a lot of items on the list. I have been hit by this before when using FileInputFormat.addInputPath. > Configuration should support list of values > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6711 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6711 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Amar Kamat > > Configuration supports 2 operations namely _set()_ and _get()_. It would be nice to have an inbuild support for lists where there can be multiple values (i.e list of values) assigned to one key. A workaround could be > {code} > // Assume Key be the parameter key and newValue be the value to be added/appended > Configuration c = new Configuration(); > String value = c.get(Key); > value = value + " " + newValue > c.set(Key, value); > {code} > One common usecase is that in a production enviroment, some user facing params (e.g mapred.child.java.opts) are set to default values (say for performance reasons). Users themselves might want to *add* to this list. Doing a set would overwrite the previous values. The above mentioned hack is doable via code but not via command line. Hence we need the framework to support lists. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7435-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:08:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42734 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:08:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:08:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 96409 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:08:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96387 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96379 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:08:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:08:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1301.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:08:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GI8Qwn006036 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:08:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3768320.14511271441306936.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:08:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6706) Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved In-Reply-To: <19329091.128961271291643642.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857915#action_12857915 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6706: ---------------------------------------------- patch looks good. > Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6706 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6706.bp20.patch > > > Currently, the relogin in the RPC client happens on only a SaslException. But we have seen cases where other exceptions are thrown (like IllegalStateException when the client's ticket is invalid). This jira is to fix that behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7436-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:38:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56978 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 36977 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36887 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 36879 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1301.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:38:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GIcRGV006294 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:38:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26322324.15141271443107229.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:38:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "David Rosenstrauch (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6372) MurmurHash does not yield the same results as the reference C++ implementation when size % 4 >= 2 In-Reply-To: <1460990402.1258114539644.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857927#action_12857927 ] David Rosenstrauch commented on HADOOP-6372: -------------------------------------------- I just ran into this problem as well. Are there any plans to release a fix? > MurmurHash does not yield the same results as the reference C++ implementation when size % 4 >= 2 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6372 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Reporter: olivier gillet > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: HADOOP-6372.patch, murmur.patch > > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > Last rounds of MurmurHash are done in reverse order. data[length - 3], data[length - 2] and data[length - 1] in the block processing the remaining bytes should be data[len_m +2], data[len_m + 1], data[len_m]. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7437-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 18:42:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57990 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 43929 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43910 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43902 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1301.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GIgPnU006329 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11208919.15231271443345906.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:42:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6703: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6703-2.patch Per HDFS-1088, minor update to report file names in the exceptions. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7438-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 19:12:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64728 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 81642 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81621 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81613 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:12:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:12:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GJCQ7w006606 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:12:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <30255840.15791271445146948.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:12:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857937#action_12857937 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- Hong, This sounds like TFile could be adapted to my needs. Thanks for helping explain all of that thoroughly. Is this block offset/length index already maintained? It sounds like the skip-to-the-next-block optimization is not already implemented. Do you know what are the next steps required to make that happen? The other thing that needs to happen is an API to support long-valued lengths. Should I submit a patch that modifies the existing method signatures? Or provide additional methods (e.g., as in http://commons.apache.org/io/api-1.4/org/apache/commons/io/input/CountingInputStream.html) > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7439-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 19:50:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79979 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 21251 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21218 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21210 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:50:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:50:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GJoP4t006964 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:50:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <22512726.16491271447425209.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:50:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6706) Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved In-Reply-To: <19329091.128961271291643642.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857954#action_12857954 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6706: ------------------------------------- One note on the patch is that this is a stop-gap solution (and is lame, in that it banks on exception handling to do relogins). The ideal solution is to use the Refreshable interface and in that case we don't have to rely on exceptions being thrown before attempting relogins. However, as Owen noted in http://tinyurl.com/y6putxk, the patch that uses the Refreshable interface doesn't seem to be working as expected. > Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6706 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6706.bp20.patch > > > Currently, the relogin in the RPC client happens on only a SaslException. But we have seen cases where other exceptions are thrown (like IllegalStateException when the client's ticket is invalid). This jira is to fix that behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7440-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 20:12:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95726 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 42980 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42940 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42932 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:12:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:12:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GKCPt0007063 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:12:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11053553.16651271448745166.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:12:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan resolved HADOOP-6705. ---------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7441-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 20:14:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96690 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 45499 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45464 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45456 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:14:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:14:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GKEO2s007082 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:14:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11673989.16681271448864839.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:14:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Giridharan Kesavan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6705) jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira In-Reply-To: <5861257.127621271286648655.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-6705: --------------------------------------- Component/s: build Addin in the right component for jira > jiracli fails to upload test-patch comments to jira > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6705 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: build > Reporter: Giridharan Kesavan > Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6705.PATCH > > > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] Adding comment to Jira. > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] ====================================================================== > [exec] > [exec] > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] Failed to connect to: http://issues.apache.org/jira/rpc/soap/jirasoapservice-v2?wsdl > [exec] % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7442-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 20:47:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13766 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 611 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 585 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 577 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:47:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:47:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GKlQCo007322 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <7132674.17211271450846709.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:47:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857966#action_12857966 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6703: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7443-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 21:27:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32574 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39224 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39194 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39186 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:27:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:27:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GLRQN2007618 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12748021.17721271453246766.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:27:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6711) Configuration should support list of values In-Reply-To: <26101198.3701271399604546.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858010#action_12858010 ] Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HADOOP-6711: ---------------------------------------------- Configuration has a getStringCollection API : public Collection getStringCollection(String name) There is no such set method though. > Configuration should support list of values > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6711 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6711 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: conf > Reporter: Amar Kamat > > Configuration supports 2 operations namely _set()_ and _get()_. It would be nice to have an inbuild support for lists where there can be multiple values (i.e list of values) assigned to one key. A workaround could be > {code} > // Assume Key be the parameter key and newValue be the value to be added/appended > Configuration c = new Configuration(); > String value = c.get(Key); > value = value + " " + newValue > c.set(Key, value); > {code} > One common usecase is that in a production enviroment, some user facing params (e.g mapred.child.java.opts) are set to default values (say for performance reasons). Users themselves might want to *add* to this list. Doing a set would overwrite the previous values. The above mentioned hack is doable via code but not via command line. Hence we need the framework to support lists. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7444-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 21:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43983 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 43305 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43277 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43269 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:35:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:35:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GLZR0S007674 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1111229.17831271453727002.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:35:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858011#action_12858011 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- bq. Is this block offset/length index already maintained? Yes. bq. It sounds like the skip-to-the-next-block optimization is not already implemented. Do you know what are the next steps required to make that happen? Correct. There is no immediate plan for me to work on this. The implementation could be quite simple but I'll need a bit more time to refresh my mind of the code structure. Also, would you be able to help test this? bq. The other thing that needs to happen is an API to support long-valued lengths. Should I submit a patch that modifies the existing method signatures? I think modifying the existing method signature is fine (not clear why we need CountingInputStream in TFile, users should be able to create one on top of the input stream we provide, right?). > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7445-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 21:43:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75436 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 21:43:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 21:43:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 45929 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:43:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45901 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:43:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45893 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 21:43:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:43:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:43:46 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GLhQ2s007777 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:43:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3120465.18111271454206301.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:43:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858015#action_12858015 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- I'm definitely able to help test. I can do some manual testing of large records / performance after there's a patch available. I wasn't suggesting that we use CountingInputStream in there; I was mostly using that as an example of having dual interfaces to retrieve the same value -- one as an integer ({{getCount()}}), and the other as a long ({{getByteCount()}}). This is not my preference; I'd prefer to modify the existing methods. But it is an incompatible change, so I figured I'd check first. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7446-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 21:47:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 77254 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 49958 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49931 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49923 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:47:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:47:47 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GLlQ0K007829 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <28013434.18251271454446322.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:47:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858017#action_12858017 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6708: ----------------------------------- FWIW I've marked the TFile interfaces as "Evolving" in HADOOP-6668, which would be consistent with making an incompatible change for the next release. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7447-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 22:05:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85566 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 68899 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68839 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68826 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:05:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:05:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GM5Tok007975 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19068671.18561271455529383.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:05:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7448-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 22:07:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86636 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 72670 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72642 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72634 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:07:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:07:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GM7RTh008040 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26757374.18621271455647479.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701-20s.patch Attaching patch for hadoop 20.s . > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-20s.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7449-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 22:07:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86740 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 72902 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72871 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72863 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:07:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1302.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:07:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GM7XRf008101 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <11715354.18821271455653935.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch Patch for trunk . > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-20s.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7450-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 22:15:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90164 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 22:15:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 22:15:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 83476 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:15:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83441 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 22:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83433 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 22:15:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:15:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:15:48 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GMFQkw008256 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21450939.19121271456126588.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:15:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858033#action_12858033 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------------- Eli, does this functionality comply with rename specification of posix? It is available at http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/rename.html. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7451-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 16 23:51:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45409 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 35006 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34966 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34958 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:51:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:51:49 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3GNpRBC008884 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:51:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2429504.20581271461887379.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:51:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858054#action_12858054 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6563: ------------------------------------- Yes. See the initial comment for the caveat "conforms to the posix behavior (modulo the overwrite option which is not present in rename(2))". > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7453-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 18 16:21:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22921 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2010 16:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34801 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34653 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34635 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:21:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1307.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:21:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3IGLPNf002439 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21174558.32921271607685888.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Plevyak (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6712) librecordio support for xerces 3, eliminate compiler warnings and the (optional) ability to compile in the source directory In-Reply-To: <13573953.32891271607685237.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Plevyak updated HADOOP-6712: --------------------------------- Attachment: librecordio-jp-v1.patch > librecordio support for xerces 3, eliminate compiler warnings and the (optional) ability to compile in the source directory > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6712 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6712 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: record > Environment: 64-bit linux w/gcc 4.4.3 w/xerces 3 > Reporter: John Plevyak > Attachments: librecordio-jp-v1.patch > > > I don't know if this code is current supported, but since it is in the tree here are some fixes: > 1. support for xerces 3.X as well as 2.X > the patch checks XERCES_VERSION_MAJOR and I have tested on 3.X but before > committing, someone should retest on 2.X > 2. gcc 4.4.3 on 64-bit complains about using %lld with int64_t. Casting > to 'long long int' solves the issue > 3. since there is currently no ant target, check if LIBRECORDIO_BUILD_DIR > is undefined and if so assume '.' to support compiling in the source directory > This should not effect "normal" compilation if/when an ant target is created. > patch attached -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7452-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 18 16:21:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22918 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2010 16:21:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34705 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34634 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34626 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2010 16:21:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:21:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1307.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:21:45 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3IGLP4S002430 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <13573953.32891271607685237.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Plevyak (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6712) librecordio support for xerces 3, eliminate compiler warnings and the (optional) ability to compile in the source directory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 librecordio support for xerces 3, eliminate compiler warnings and the (optional) ability to compile in the source directory --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6712 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6712 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: record Environment: 64-bit linux w/gcc 4.4.3 w/xerces 3 Reporter: John Plevyak Attachments: librecordio-jp-v1.patch I don't know if this code is current supported, but since it is in the tree here are some fixes: 1. support for xerces 3.X as well as 2.X the patch checks XERCES_VERSION_MAJOR and I have tested on 3.X but before committing, someone should retest on 2.X 2. gcc 4.4.3 on 64-bit complains about using %lld with int64_t. Casting to 'long long int' solves the issue 3. since there is currently no ant target, check if LIBRECORDIO_BUILD_DIR is undefined and if so assume '.' to support compiling in the source directory This should not effect "normal" compilation if/when an ant target is created. patch attached -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From common-issues-return-7454-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 05:55:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 30194 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 05:55:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 05:55:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78734 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 05:55:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78608 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 05:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78600 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 05:55:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:55:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1308.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:55:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3J5sn6M008605 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:54:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:54:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6713 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0 Reporter: dhruba borthakur Assignee: Dmytro Molkov The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7455-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 06:12:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38913 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 92131 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92108 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92093 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:12:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3J6Bp9J008694 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <28549148.5131271657510999.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Christian Kunz (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858391#action_12858391 ] Christian Kunz commented on HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------------- That would be a great improvement for our clusters as well. Probably for any cluster with a lot of clients not necessarily being map-reduce applications. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7456-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 06:12:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38915 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 92156 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92111 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92092 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 06:12:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:12:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3J6Bok8008685 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:11:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3985483.5101271657510471.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858390#action_12858390 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6713: ------------------------------------------ My proposal is that the Server.Listener.run() thread only executes doAccept(). Also there are a bunch of open Selector objects (instead of just one Selector object in the current code). Each of these Selector objects are handled by its own thread. The Server.Listener.run() invoke doAccept() that inserts a SocketChannel into a randomly selected Selector object. The thread that is monitoring this Selector object will then invoke doRead() and process the RPC. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7457-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 06:26:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52664 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 06:26:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 06:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 668 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99479 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 06:26:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99463 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 06:26:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:26:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:26:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3J6Po33008745 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:25:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <26053823.5171271658350596.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:25:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858392#action_12858392 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6713: ------------------------------------------ Hi Christian, I agree with you. We have around 40K clients hitting the namenode and the NN ( inspite of running NN on a newest and greatest Nehalem) has one CPU completely maxed out by the Server.Listener thread. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7458-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 15:59:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78163 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 15:59:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 15:59:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 92123 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 15:59:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92092 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 15:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92073 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 15:59:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:59:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:59:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JFwnqk001810 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:58:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs ------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6714 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Patrick Angeles Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7459-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 16:12:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 90745 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 16:12:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 16:12:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 23323 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 16:12:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23263 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 16:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 23255 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 16:12:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:12:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1311.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:12:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JGBpoW001934 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24892727.14801271693511099.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:11:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Edward Capriolo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Reopened: (HADOOP-6664) fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. In-Reply-To: <1859905315.553281269879147219.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward Capriolo reopened HADOOP-6664: ------------------------------------- In the future, can you please not close a ticket before I even have a chance to reply. 1) the generated documentation on the site is wrong. 2) the generated xml files in the src directory are putting variables in the wrong files. People who are not 'In the know' will put configuration variables in the wrong file and not get the effect they desire. > fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: conf, documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Edward Capriolo > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > fs.inmemory.size.mb does not appear in any xml file > {noformat} > grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./mapred/mapred-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./hdfs/hdfs-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./core/core-default.xml > {noformat} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > Documentation error: > Real-World Cluster Configurations > {noformat} > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.factor 100 More streams merged at once while sorting files. > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.mb 200 Higher memory-limit while sorting data. > {noformat} > core --- io.sort.factor -- should be mapred > core --- io.sort.mb -- should be mapred -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7460-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 17:24:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17608 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 55370 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55258 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55250 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1312.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:24:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JHNnOh002766 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:23:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4191593.16391271697829807.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:23:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs In-Reply-To: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Angeles updated HADOOP-6714: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6714.patch Attaching simple patch to resolve a file decompressor on 'hadoop fs -text' before continuing with prior behavior. > FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-6714.patch > > > Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). > It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7461-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 17:24:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17653 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 17:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 55428 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55395 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55387 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 17:24:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:24:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:24:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JHNoXf002772 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2214550.16411271697830117.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Patrick Angeles (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs In-Reply-To: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Angeles updated HADOOP-6714: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-6714.patch > > > Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). > It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7462-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 19 17:50:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26467 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 17:50:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 17:50:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4915 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4802 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 17:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4793 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 17:50:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:50:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3JHnoo8003172 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <9907722.16991271699390496.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:49:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs In-Reply-To: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858612#action_12858612 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6714: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442200/HADOOP-6714.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/464/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/464/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/464/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/464/console This message is automatically generated. > FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-6714.patch > > > Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). > It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7463-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:40:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34530 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 44835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43978 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43691 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:40:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:40:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9dmeT008745 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:39:48 GMT Message-ID: <22838944.80011271756388297.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:39:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Neil Bliss updated HADOOP-6704: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6704.0.20.2.patch Here's a patch against the 0.20.2 tag. A patch against trunk will be forthcoming shortly. I'll take a look at the stress testing Jira and see if it's something we can help with. > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Attachments: HADOOP-6704.0.20.2.patch > > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7464-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:40:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34538 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:40:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 44938 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44837 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44160 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:40:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:40:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9dqOP008808 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:39:52 GMT Message-ID: <17929090.80181271756392446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:39:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6706) Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved In-Reply-To: <19329091.128961271291643642.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6706: -------------------------------- Attachment: 6706.bp20.1.patch Attaching a patch that fixes a bug in the earlier version of the Y20s patch. Not for commit. > Relogin behavior for RPC clients could be improved > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6706 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6706 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6706.bp20.1.patch, 6706.bp20.patch > > > Currently, the relogin in the RPC client happens on only a SaslException. But we have seen cases where other exceptions are thrown (like IllegalStateException when the client's ticket is invalid). This jira is to fix that behavior. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7465-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:41:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36565 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 52503 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51552 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51222 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:41:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1315.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:41:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9efwo009488 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:40:41 GMT Message-ID: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:40:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6715 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Ravi Gummadi Assignee: Ravi Gummadi AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "*". I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "*" when we set the acl to "*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7466-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:41:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37860 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:41:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 59976 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58659 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58622 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:41:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:41:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1315.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:41:26 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9f6A0009847 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:41:06 GMT Message-ID: <22495579.83621271756466349.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:41:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hemanth Yamijala updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) I looked at the patch as a sanity check and it seems fine. There were couple of formatting problems in the patch which I will fix and upload a new one soon. Canceling the current patch to take care of that. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7467-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:46:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39874 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:46:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:46:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 68361 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:46:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68327 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68215 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:46:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:46:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:46:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9jtux009952 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:45:55 GMT Message-ID: <16692809.83851271756755821.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:45:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hemanth Yamijala updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6439-7.patch Patch fixing minor formatting problems; no other changes. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7468-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:48:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40078 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 70122 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70098 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70090 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:48:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:48:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9lqMV009990 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:47:52 GMT Message-ID: <3272037.83961271756872164.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:47:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hemanth Yamijala updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Running through Hudson. Chaitanya, can you please (one last time hopefully, *smile*), test a core jar built with this patch with mapreduce and HDFS and then I can commit this ? > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7469-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 09:57:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43625 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 09:57:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 09:57:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 80518 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:57:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80406 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 09:57:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80393 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 09:57:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:57:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:57:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3K9upMl010215 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:56:51 GMT Message-ID: <33363576.84001271757411543.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:56:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858798#action_12858798 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6715: ------------------------------------------ Maybe something a little more user-friendly ? Like ALL USERS or something like that ? There is a similar, but more pertinent, display issue with empty string. There, we display an empty string, which in effect shows up as nothing. It would be nice to show something like NONE. > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "*" when we set the acl to "*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7470-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 13:11:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95931 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 13:11:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 13:11:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 60603 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:11:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60419 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60408 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 13:11:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1316.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:11:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KDAqOZ012275 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:10:52 GMT Message-ID: <3519259.87341271769052618.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:10:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858866#action_12858866 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442271/HADOOP-6439-7.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/465/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/465/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/465/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/465/console This message is automatically generated. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7471-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 13:43:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6540 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 13:43:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 13:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2593 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:43:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:43:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2512 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 13:43:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:43:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:43:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KDgoKj012567 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:42:50 GMT Message-ID: <22410054.87931271770970243.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:42:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858884#action_12858884 ] Ravi Gummadi commented on HADOOP-6715: -------------------------------------- Right. Would look good, if .toString() is used for displaying only. But if .toString() is used to save it as a String and later set it to a key in some Configuration object, then "ALL USERS" will not be considered as "*" and will cause an issue ? > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "*" when we set the acl to "*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7472-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 13:45:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7199 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 5945 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5909 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5901 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:45:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1316.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:45:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KDioHt012603 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:44:51 GMT Message-ID: <18786686.88011271771090949.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:44:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6715: --------------------------------- Description: AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". was: AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "*". I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "*" when we set the acl to "*". > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7473-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 14:35:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29629 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 96722 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96671 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96663 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:35:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1317.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:35:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KEYpSK013257 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:34:52 GMT Message-ID: <22754322.88951271774091754.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:34:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858905#action_12858905 ] Neil Bliss commented on HADOOP-6704: ------------------------------------ that patch still contains unit test failures. I will fix it and respin the patch. > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7474-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 14:35:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29889 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 97215 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97182 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97174 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:35:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:35:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KEYs4w013281 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:34:54 GMT Message-ID: <8866948.89031271774094520.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:34:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Neil Bliss (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6704) add support for Parascale filesystem In-Reply-To: <6991209.115951271258268758.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Neil Bliss updated HADOOP-6704: ------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6704.0.20.2.patch) > add support for Parascale filesystem > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6704 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Neil Bliss > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > Parascale has developed an org.apache.hadoop.fs implementation that allows users to use Hadoop on Parascale storage clusters. We'd like to contribute this work to the community. Should this be placed under contrib, or integrated into the org.apache.hadoop.fs space? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7475-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 15:31:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58703 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 15:31:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 15:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 683 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 15:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 628 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 15:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 619 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 15:31:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:31:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1317.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:31:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KFUpjU014070 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:30:51 GMT Message-ID: <5124415.90511271777451177.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:30:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6690.0.patch Uploading patch > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7476-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 15:33:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59710 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 4091 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4067 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4059 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:33:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:33:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KFWqGP014095 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:32:52 GMT Message-ID: <20193989.90581271777572301.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:32:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Affects Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) (was: 0.20.3) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7477-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 18:55:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71910 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 18:55:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 18:55:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 58135 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 18:55:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57832 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 18:55:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57708 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 18:55:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:55:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1318.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:55:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KIsocI016187 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:54:51 GMT Message-ID: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:54:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6716 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Boris Shkolnik -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7478-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 19:09:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79317 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 79811 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79705 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79697 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:09:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1318.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:09:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KJ8o5U016278 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:08:50 GMT Message-ID: <785035.94951271790530341.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6664) fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. In-Reply-To: <1859905315.553281269879147219.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859024#action_12859024 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6664: --------------------------------------- Sorry for closing the issue prematurely, but I'm still unclear on what this issue is about. It sounded like you were saying that {{io.sort.factor}} and {{io.sort.mb}} belong in mapred-default.xml rather than core-default.xml, which I thought I'd answered by noting that these parameters are also used in o.a.h.io.SequenceFile (which is in core, not mapred). Given that {{fs.inmemory.size.mb}} is unused, that it doesn't appear in the default configs is also correct. bq. the generated documentation on the site is wrong. bq. the generated xml files in the src directory are putting variables in the wrong files. How? Can you either explain what is "wrong" or post a patch correcting the error? > fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: conf, documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Edward Capriolo > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > fs.inmemory.size.mb does not appear in any xml file > {noformat} > grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./mapred/mapred-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./hdfs/hdfs-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./core/core-default.xml > {noformat} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > Documentation error: > Real-World Cluster Configurations > {noformat} > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.factor 100 More streams merged at once while sorting files. > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.mb 200 Higher memory-limit while sorting data. > {noformat} > core --- io.sort.factor -- should be mapred > core --- io.sort.mb -- should be mapred -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7479-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 19:25:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87133 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 94894 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94844 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94836 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:25:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:25:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KJOoMX016441 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:24:51 GMT Message-ID: <208551.95351271791490779.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:24:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859031#action_12859031 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------- +1 Patch looks good. Mind adding TestFilterFs that's a FilterFs equivalent to TestFilterFileSystem? Should be an pretty easy port. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7480-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 19:31:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91662 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 19:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 19:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 6171 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5967 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5955 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 19:31:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1318.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:31:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KJUq3a016511 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:30:52 GMT Message-ID: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:30:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high -------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6717 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: security Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Trivial The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7481-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 19:33:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93280 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 11130 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11104 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11096 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:33:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KJWomT016529 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:32:50 GMT Message-ID: <24357208.95571271791970778.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:32:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high In-Reply-To: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6717: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-6717.txt > > > The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7482-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 19:33:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93336 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 11268 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11245 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11237 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:33:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:33:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KJWoaj016523 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:32:50 GMT Message-ID: <2113857.95551271791970169.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:32:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high In-Reply-To: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6717: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6717.txt > Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-6717.txt > > > The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7483-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 20:03:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13357 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 20:03:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 20:03:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 59058 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 20:03:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58970 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 20:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58962 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 20:03:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:03:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:03:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KK2ojO016811 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:02:50 GMT Message-ID: <32873051.96001271793770473.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:02:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Edward Capriolo (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6664) fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. In-Reply-To: <1859905315.553281269879147219.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859044#action_12859044 ] Edward Capriolo commented on HADOOP-6664: ----------------------------------------- If I understandard correctly the docs for current are based on current stable 0.20.2. Current stable does not use fs.inmemory.size.mb. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html. Under real world configurations {noformat} conf/core-site.xml fs.inmemory.size.mb 200 Larger amount of memory allocated for the in-memory file-system used to merge map-outputs at the reduces. {noformat} As to "io.sort.factor and io.sort.mb" They both appear in mapred-default.xml {noformat} [edward@ec src]$ grep -R "io.sort.factor" */*.xml mapred/mapred-default.xml: io.sort.factor {noformat} They should be in core-default.xml (only), or in both core-default.xml and mapred-default.conf. Think about the end user. An end user might read a blog that states, "io.sort.factor is a magic tune set this to XXXX for awesome performance". Which file should end user put this variable in? {noformat} grep -R "io.sort.factor" */*.xml mapred/mapred-default.xml: io.sort.factor {noformat} End user thinks, "Since I found this variable in mapred-default.xml it makese sense that I should override it in mapred-site.xml" The user puts the variable in the wrong place, because end user has no (easy) way of knowing that SequenceFile uses io.sort.factor or io.sort.mb. Does that make sense? > fs.inmemory.size.mb not listed in conf. Cluster setup page gives wrong advice. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6664 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6664 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Components: conf, documentation > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Edward Capriolo > > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > fs.inmemory.size.mb does not appear in any xml file > {noformat} > grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./mapred/mapred-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./hdfs/hdfs-default.xml > [edward@ec src]$ grep "fs.inmemory.size.mb" ./core/core-default.xml > {noformat} > http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/current/cluster_setup.html > Documentation error: > Real-World Cluster Configurations > {noformat} > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.factor 100 More streams merged at once while sorting files. > conf/core-site.xml io.sort.mb 200 Higher memory-limit while sorting data. > {noformat} > core --- io.sort.factor -- should be mapred > core --- io.sort.mb -- should be mapred -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7484-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:02:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 78979 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:02:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:02:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 24351 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:02:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24303 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:02:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24295 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:02:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:02:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:02:21 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KM1xVl017944 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:02:00 GMT Message-ID: <13545372.98221271800919730.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:01:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859089#action_12859089 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- Sure! I can do that. I'll update the patch later today. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7485-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:44:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 871 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:44:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 70026 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:44:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69932 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69922 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:44:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:44:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:44:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KMhnPi018317 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:43:50 GMT Message-ID: <723292.98981271803429721.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:43:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high In-Reply-To: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859104#action_12859104 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6717: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442343/hadoop-6717.txt against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/44/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/44/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/44/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/44/console This message is automatically generated. > Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-6717.txt > > > The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7486-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:46:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1739 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70711 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70607 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70594 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:46:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:46:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KMjoO0018335 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:45:50 GMT Message-ID: <12149021.99011271803550088.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:45:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high In-Reply-To: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859105#action_12859105 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6717: ------------------------------------- bq. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. This is a trivial change, nothing to test. > Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Trivial > Attachments: hadoop-6717.txt > > > The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7487-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:50:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3623 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 75107 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75008 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74998 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:50:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:50:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KMnolr018370 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:49:50 GMT Message-ID: <8429307.99101271803790256.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:49:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859107#action_12859107 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442315/HADOOP-6690.0.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1028 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1024 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/466/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/466/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/466/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/466/console This message is automatically generated. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7488-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:58:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7804 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 80478 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80439 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80431 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:58:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KMvoO1018493 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:57:50 GMT Message-ID: <11572587.99461271804270474.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:57:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859113#action_12859113 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- The warnings are generated because the methods of the DontCheck class are used by reflection. I'll silence these warnings in my next patch, but I'm not sure if Hadoop QA won't complain about that. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7489-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 20 23:36:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27939 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 23:36:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 23:36:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18037 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17982 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17967 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 23:36:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:36:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:36:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3KNZntV018934 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:35:49 GMT Message-ID: <15471232.100441271806549356.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:35:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6718) Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6718 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6718 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Devaraj Das Assignee: Devaraj Das Fix For: 0.22.0 setupSaslConnection in the RPC client might fail to successfully set up a sasl connection (e.g. if the principal is wrongly configured). It throws an exception back to the caller (setupIOstreams). setupIOstreams marks the connection as closed but it doesn't really close the socket. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7490-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:25:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69751 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:25:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 68907 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:25:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68858 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:25:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68850 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:25:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:25:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:25:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0OoHp019721 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:24:50 GMT Message-ID: <7676854.101531271809490191.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:24:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859141#action_12859141 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- Eli, while I was creating TestFilterFs, I realized there was a number of methods that were not being implemented. Some of them are quite suspicious like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory(), ... Can you please double check if FilterFs is fine without these methods. If it's not the case, it would be better to create a separate JIRA for that. Here is the complete list: {code} { public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } public void checkPath(Path path) { } public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } public URI getUri() { return null; } public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } } {code} > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7491-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:51:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87526 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 87353 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87320 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87312 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0opMK020092 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:50:51 GMT Message-ID: <14007865.102351271811051578.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:50:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6690.1.patch) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7492-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:51:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87588 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87476 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87454 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87446 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0ooeu020073 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:50:51 GMT Message-ID: <25290002.102291271811050757.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:50:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6690.1.patch New patch without any warnings. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7493-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:51:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87619 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87624 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87588 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87580 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0osci020128 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:50:54 GMT Message-ID: <32513304.102471271811054469.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:50:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6690.1.patch New patch without any warnings. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7494-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:51:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87683 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 87755 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87723 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87715 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0otaa020164 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:50:55 GMT Message-ID: <13581695.102591271811055618.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7495-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:51:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87744 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 87899 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87867 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87859 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:51:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0otum020146 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:50:55 GMT Message-ID: <25098635.102531271811055034.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7496-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:56:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89940 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 90642 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90617 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90609 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:56:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:56:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0to2b020190 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:55:50 GMT Message-ID: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:55:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Missing methods on FilterFs --------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6719 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt Fix For: 0.22.0 The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. Here is the complete list: {code} { public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } public void checkPath(Path path) { } public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } public URI getUri() { return null; } public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7497-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 00:58:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91076 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 91589 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91545 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91535 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:58:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:58:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0voAO020213 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:57:50 GMT Message-ID: <19670103.102701271811470629.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:57:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859153#action_12859153 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------------- I was talking to Dhruba and we thought it would be better to create a new issue to discuss the methods missing on FilterFs() and its unit test. I just created HADOOP-6719 for that. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7498-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 01:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92113 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 92598 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92576 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92568 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:00:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0xpKI020275 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:59:51 GMT Message-ID: <1286125.102781271811591231.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:59:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7499-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 01:00:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92171 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 92740 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92711 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92703 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:00:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:00:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L0xoqJ020263 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:59:50 GMT Message-ID: <13460370.102741271811590587.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:59:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6719.0.patch Unit test that passes with the current implementation of FilterFs, but might have to be modified if we decide some of the missing methods should be there. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7500-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 01:14:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98092 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 01:14:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 01:14:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 97352 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:14:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97296 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 01:14:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97288 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 01:14:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:14:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1319.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:14:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L1Dp43020412 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:13:51 GMT Message-ID: <20253075.102971271812431060.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:13:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859158#action_12859158 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6719: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442378/HADOOP-6719.0.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/45/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/45/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/45/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/45/console This message is automatically generated. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7501-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 02:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32146 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 44986 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44950 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44942 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:24:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:24:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L2NoMq020806 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:23:51 GMT Message-ID: <27289628.103571271816630898.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859169#action_12859169 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442377/HADOOP-6690.1.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1028 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1024 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/467/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/467/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/467/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/467/console This message is automatically generated. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7502-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 03:08:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46872 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 03:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 03:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 67344 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:08:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67218 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67209 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 03:08:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:08:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:08:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L37q7C021006 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:07:53 GMT Message-ID: <21009261.103861271819272790.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "V.V.Chaitanya Krishna (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859175#action_12859175 ] V.V.Chaitanya Krishna commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------------------- Ran tests of mapreduce and hdfs with the core jar built with this patch. All tests passed except for TestTrackerDistributedCacheManager in mapreduce and TestFiHFlush in hdfs. These tests failed even without this patch being applied. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7503-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 03:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47583 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 70844 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70727 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70717 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:14:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:14:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L3Doj0021193 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:13:50 GMT Message-ID: <18667817.104441271819630411.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:13:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859178#action_12859178 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------- My understanding is that FilterFs should override all AFS methods, the FilterFs javadoc concurs: "The class FilterFs itself simply overrides all methods of AbstractFileSystem with versions that pass all requests to the contained file system." It currently gets away with not overriding these because its subclasses, ChecksumFs and LocalFs, don't need to override them. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7504-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 03:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47589 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 70865 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70736 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70726 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 03:14:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:14:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L3Dpe4021205 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:13:51 GMT Message-ID: <30123209.104481271819631196.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:13:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859179#action_12859179 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------- Forgot to mention in the patch DontCheck should be removed and the necessary methods overridden in FilterFs. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7505-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 03:49:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52013 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 03:49:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 03:49:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 81416 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:49:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81306 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:49:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81297 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 03:49:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:49:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:49:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L3mnFn021323 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:48:50 GMT Message-ID: <24069909.104601271821729836.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:48:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present In-Reply-To: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859182#action_12859182 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6716: -------------------------------------------- I believe it is caused by the fact that Kerberos needs a config file to merely instantiate its {{Config}} class. Very unfortunate. > System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6716 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7506-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 03:53:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52182 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 03:53:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 03:53:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 81883 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:53:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81765 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 03:53:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 81757 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 03:53:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:53:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:53:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L3qpin021364 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:52:51 GMT Message-ID: <18211355.104701271821971172.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:52:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7507-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:15:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55252 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 93105 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92937 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92916 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4EpF1021994 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:14:51 GMT Message-ID: <6823505.105151271823291064.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7508-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:15:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55266 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 93130 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92960 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92951 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4EoqN021982 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:14:50 GMT Message-ID: <23905821.105111271823290448.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:14:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6658.patch Test failures were due to a xerces jar being pulled onto the classpath for jdiff. It's not needed for compilation, or for the targets that use jdiff, since they use the xerces jar bundled with jdiff. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7509-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:15:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55291 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 93260 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93216 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93107 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:15:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4Ep0H022006 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:14:51 GMT Message-ID: <9812506.105191271823291407.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:14:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7511-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:37:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57442 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3786 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3563 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3547 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:37:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4apEj022126 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:36:51 GMT Message-ID: <25775877.105401271824611102.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:36:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch, HADOOP-6690.2.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7510-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:37:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57468 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3787 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3560 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3543 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:37:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:37:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:37:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4aoaY022107 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:36:50 GMT Message-ID: <8175298.105341271824610365.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:36:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6690.2.patch Found a couple of more warnings. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch, HADOOP-6690.2.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7512-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:45:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58355 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:45:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 8392 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:45:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8278 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8268 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:45:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:45:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:45:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4iqaa022186 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:44:52 GMT Message-ID: <3562419.105531271825092286.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:44:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859191#action_12859191 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ Chaitanya, thanks for running the tests. The patch for trunk is ready for commit. However, I tried to see if the patch applies to branch 0.21 as well, since this is a blocker for that version. The patch failed to apply, unfortunately. Can you please upload a patch for that as well ? > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7513-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:53:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59468 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:53:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:53:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 15120 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:53:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15011 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15003 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:53:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:53:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:53:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4qpv2022373 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:52:51 GMT Message-ID: <1915793.106111271825571451.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:52:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Amareshwari Sriramadasu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859195#action_12859195 ] Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------------- bq. However, I tried to see if the patch applies to branch 0.21 as well, since this is a blocker for that version. The patch failed to apply, unfortunately. Can you please upload a patch for that as well ? @Hemanth, I don't think we need to update patches for branch 0.21, as per discussion in general mailing list, branch 0.21 will be cut from trunk itself. @Tom, please correct me if I'm wrong. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7514-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:55:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59948 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:55:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:55:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 17427 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:55:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:55:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17347 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:55:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:55:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:55:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4soAo022414 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:54:50 GMT Message-ID: <5029427.106171271825690031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:54:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859196#action_12859196 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6690: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442393/HADOOP-6690.2.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/46/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/46/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/46/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/46/console This message is automatically generated. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch, HADOOP-6690.2.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7515-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:59:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61437 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 20282 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20219 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20211 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:59:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:59:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4woKr022439 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:58:50 GMT Message-ID: <4412474.106231271825930708.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:58:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859197#action_12859197 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------------ +1 thanks, I will commit this patch. > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch, HADOOP-6690.2.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7516-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 04:59:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61785 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20420 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20375 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20367 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:59:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:59:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L4wqFD022472 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:58:52 GMT Message-ID: <457280.106341271825932765.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:58:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859198#action_12859198 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------------ bq. @Hemanth, I don't think we need to update patches for branch 0.21, as per discussion in general mailing list, branch 0.21 will be cut from trunk itself. Ah. If that's so, then we are good to go. I will wait for Tom's / anyone else's confirmation on this. > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7518-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 05:03:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62613 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22224 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22081 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22056 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L52r0h022578 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:02:53 GMT Message-ID: <10919803.106621271826173060.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:02:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6719.1.patch Following Eli's suggestions. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7517-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 05:03:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62597 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22222 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22071 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22054 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1320.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L52r5O022590 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:02:53 GMT Message-ID: <4483014.106661271826173398.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:02:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7519-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 05:03:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62614 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22362 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22084 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22072 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 05:03:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:03:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L52oXl022554 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:02:51 GMT Message-ID: <26434377.106541271826170755.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:02:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7520-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 05:33:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70464 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 05:33:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 05:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 35136 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:33:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35018 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:33:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 35010 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 05:33:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:33:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:33:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L5WsTV022770 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:32:55 GMT Message-ID: <9766024.106991271827974611.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:32:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859208#action_12859208 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6719: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442395/HADOOP-6719.1.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/47/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/47/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/47/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/47/console This message is automatically generated. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7521-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 05:57:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82112 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 05:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 05:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 50682 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:57:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50481 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 05:57:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50459 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 05:57:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:57:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:57:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L5uob1023027 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:56:50 GMT Message-ID: <32356063.107651271829410416.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:56:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859217#action_12859217 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442392/HADOOP-6658.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/468/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/468/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/468/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/468/console This message is automatically generated. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7522-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 06:31:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5139 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 06:31:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 06:31:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 73701 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:31:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73519 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:31:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73493 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 06:31:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:31:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:31:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L6UqWr023479 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:30:52 GMT Message-ID: <12884800.108831271831452171.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:30:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859233#action_12859233 ] Rodrigo Schmidt commented on HADOOP-6719: ----------------------------------------- Implementing checkScheme inside FilterFs has broken 128 unit tests. I'm taking it out and trying again. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7523-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 06:33:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5984 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 06:33:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 75062 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75010 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75002 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1321.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L6Wokd023516 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:32:50 GMT Message-ID: <7613064.108941271831570533.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:32:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7524-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 06:33:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6035 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75176 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75145 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75137 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L6Wpee023528 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:32:51 GMT Message-ID: <5116574.108981271831571291.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:32:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6719.2.patch > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7525-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 06:33:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6075 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75316 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75278 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75264 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:33:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L6Wpfx023540 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:32:51 GMT Message-ID: <28130136.109021271831571658.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:32:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Took checkScheme() out of FilterFs > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7526-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 09:59:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63560 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 09:59:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 09:59:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 42010 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 09:59:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41880 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 09:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41871 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 09:59:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:59:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1322.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:59:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3L9wohS025465 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:58:50 GMT Message-ID: <31867653.111491271843930521.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:58:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859284#action_12859284 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6719: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442401/HADOOP-6719.2.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/469/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/469/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/469/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/469/console This message is automatically generated. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7527-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 11:09:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83733 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 11:09:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 64985 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64853 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64841 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 11:09:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:09:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1323.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:09:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LB8oSv028894 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:08:50 GMT Message-ID: <13949680.112501271848130766.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-6715: ------------------------------ Component/s: security util I propose we separate the display functionality from {{toString()}} as the latter can potentially be used for other purposes as Ravi mentioned above. So we will - fix {{toString()}} addressing the bug related to the wild-card '*' - add a new API say {{AccessControlList.getDisplayString()}}. This should return "ALL USERS" for '*' and "NONE" for ' ' (empty space character) and the output of {{toString}} for every other value of ACL. Thoughts? > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security, util > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7528-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 11:24:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86981 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 11:24:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 11:24:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 86883 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:24:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86393 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 11:24:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86385 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 11:24:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:24:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:24:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LBNppl029037 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:23:51 GMT Message-ID: <15654921.112641271849031712.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:23:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859303#action_12859303 ] Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6715: ------------------------------------------ Can one of you help me understand what Ravi means by "save it as a String and later set it to a key in some Configuration object" ? It seems like we need to store the ACL objects in some map, and possibly these need to be reconstructed from a serialized representation (like for task log access, maybe ?) and we are using the key of the map as the String that is thus serialized. If that's the case, can we serialize the ACL using some representation that stores the actual name and value as separate fields rather than a toString representation, use a hashCode / equals on the ACL object to build a key based on these fields, and use toString for display purposes. This seems more canonical to me (inline with what toString is typically used for). > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security, util > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7529-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 13:18:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24637 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 13:18:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 13:18:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 72520 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 13:18:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72455 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 13:18:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72447 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 13:18:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:18:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:18:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LDHskf000316 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:17:54 GMT Message-ID: <11090946.114501271855874117.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:17:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Danny Leshem (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException In-Reply-To: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859341#action_12859341 ] Danny Leshem commented on HADOOP-6688: -------------------------------------- While going over the code to suggest a patch, I found out this was partially fixed as part of HADOOP-6201: S3FileSystem.delete now catches FileNotFoundException and simply returns false, as opposed to propagating the exception as described in the issue. The reason I'm calling this a partial fix is that such recursive directory delete will stop (returning false) the moment the above issue happens. The proper behavior, in my opinion, is to 1) continue deleting files 2) return false only if the top-most directory could not be found. > FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6688 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 > Reporter: Danny Leshem > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. > This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. > The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. > The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: > {code} > java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > {code} > (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7530-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 13:46:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31852 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 13:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 13:46:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 32212 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 13:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32106 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 13:46:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32098 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 13:46:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1324.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:46:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LDjoQW000625 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:45:50 GMT Message-ID: <10840354.115101271857550552.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:45:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Danny Leshem (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6688) FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException In-Reply-To: <1780197215.37411270627173494.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Danny Leshem updated HADOOP-6688: --------------------------------- Priority: Minor (was: Blocker) > FileSystem.delete(...) implementations should not throw FileNotFoundException > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6688 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6688 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Environment: Amazon EC2/S3 > Reporter: Danny Leshem > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > S3FileSystem.delete(Path path, boolean recursive) may fail and throw a FileNotFoundException if a directory is being deleted while at the same time some of its files are deleted in the background. > This is definitely not the expected behavior of a delete method. If one of the to-be-deleted files is found missing, the method should not fail and simply continue. This is true for the general contract of FileSystem.delete, and also for its various implementations: RawLocalFileSystem (and specifically FileUtil.fullyDelete) exhibits the same problem. > The fix is to silently catch and ignore FileNotFoundExceptions in delete loops. This can very easily be unit-tested, at least for RawLocalFileSystem. > The reason this issue bothers me is that the cleanup part of a long (Mahout) MR job inconsistently fails for me, and I think this is the root problem. The log shows: > {code} > java.io.FileNotFoundException: s3://S3-BUCKET/tmp/0008E25BF7554CA9/2521362836721872/DistributedMatrix.times.outputVector/_temporary/_attempt_201004061215_0092_r_000002_0/part-00002: No such file or directory. > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.getFileStatus(S3FileSystem.java:334) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.listStatus(S3FileSystem.java:193) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:303) > at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.S3FileSystem.delete(S3FileSystem.java:312) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.FileOutputCommitter.cleanupJob(FileOutputCommitter.java:64) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.OutputCommitter.cleanupJob(OutputCommitter.java:135) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Task.runJobCleanupTask(Task.java:826) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:292) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) > {code} > (similar errors are displayed for ReduceTask.run) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7531-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 16:02:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89060 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 16:02:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 16:02:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 3893 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:02:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3872 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3859 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 16:02:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:02:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1324.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:02:20 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LG20c4002849 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:02:00 GMT Message-ID: <8756315.117431271865720189.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:02:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859407#action_12859407 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6439: ----------------------------------- Hemanth/Amareshwari That's right - I'm going to cut a new 0.21 branch from trunk on April 30, so this patch only needs to be committed to trunk. Thanks! Tom > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7532-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 16:40:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13581 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 16:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 16:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 51717 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51649 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51640 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 16:40:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:40:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:40:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LGdpa0003141 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:39:51 GMT Message-ID: <24609601.117901271867991151.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:39:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6658.patch Tests now pass, but annotation processing doesn't seem to be working with the new classes. This patch excludes them from annotation processing, since we don't need fault injection for these tools. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7533-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 16:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14556 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 53860 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53800 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53786 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:42:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LGfomF003153 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:41:51 GMT Message-ID: <25370135.117941271868110369.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:41:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7534-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 16:42:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14666 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 54328 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54294 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54286 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:42:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:42:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LGfqrS003171 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:41:52 GMT Message-ID: <20270726.118001271868112534.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:41:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7535-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:00:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24212 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 77441 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77417 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77409 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:00:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:00:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LGxpl6003326 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:59:52 GMT Message-ID: <22332736.118281271869191787.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:59:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6709) Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 In-Reply-To: <11903376.154751271374849451.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6709: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6709 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6709.patch > > > To make the FileSystem API in the 0.21 release (which should be treated as a minor release) compatible with 0.20 the deprecated methods removed in HADOOP-4779 need to be re-instated. They should still be marked as deprecated, however. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7536-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:10:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31300 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 91789 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91752 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91744 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:10:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:10:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LH9piI003398 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:09:52 GMT Message-ID: <6089356.118421271869791842.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:09:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859432#action_12859432 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- We need to revert HADOOP-6165 to achieve this. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7537-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:10:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31360 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 91931 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91897 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91889 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:10:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:10:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LH9qn2003410 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:09:52 GMT Message-ID: <10433631.118461271869792616.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:09:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859433#action_12859433 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442450/HADOOP-6658.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/470/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/470/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/470/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/470/console This message is automatically generated. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7538-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:18:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33277 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 5259 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5132 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5124 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:18:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:18:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:18:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LHHpmf003450 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:17:52 GMT Message-ID: <3141183.118561271870271817.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:17:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6709) Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 In-Reply-To: <11903376.154751271374849451.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859436#action_12859436 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6709: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441900/HADOOP-6709.patch against trunk revision 934619. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/48/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/48/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/48/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/48/console This message is automatically generated. > Re-instate deprecated FileSystem methods that were removed after 0.20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6709 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6709 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6709.patch > > > To make the FileSystem API in the 0.21 release (which should be treated as a minor release) compatible with 0.20 the deprecated methods removed in HADOOP-4779 need to be re-instated. They should still be marked as deprecated, however. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7539-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 17:48:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48720 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 71272 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71222 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 17:48:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71214 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 17:48:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:48:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:48:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LHloEW003736 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:47:50 GMT Message-ID: <394180.119291271872070855.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:47:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859446#action_12859446 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6703: ----------------------------------------- Eli, this patch does not apply to trunk. Can you please resubmit the patch. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7540-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 18:35:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 86545 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 82269 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 18:35:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82057 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 18:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82045 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 18:35:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:35:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1326.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:35:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LIYqH9004673 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:34:53 GMT Message-ID: <19093190.121691271874892828.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:34:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D128= 59474#action_12859474 ]=20 Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6708: -------------------------------------- > Shortcomings of Avro File Format: > =E2=80=A2 Data is expected to have a schema But that schema can be just "bytes". > =E2=80=A2 No lazy reading API (yet?) True. Would this be hard to add? Also, is it important to add this to Common, or should it rather belong in = Sqoop? > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy = disk access --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7541-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 19:40:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33567 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2179 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2100 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2092 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:40:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LJdqAa005258 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:39:54 GMT Message-ID: <867538.122891271878792724.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:39:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6439) Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hemanth Yamijala updated HADOOP-6439: ------------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: (was: 0.21.0) Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks, Chaitanya ! (Also marked the fix for version to 0.22, based on Tom's response). > Shuffle deadlocks on wrong number of maps > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6439 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6439 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: V.V.Chaitanya Krishna > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6439-1.patch, HADOOP-6439-2.patch, HADOOP-6439-3.patch, HADOOP-6439-4.patch, HADOOP-6439-5.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-6.patch, HADOOP-6439-7.patch, mr-1252.patch > > > The new shuffle assumes that the number of maps is correct. The new JobSubmitter sets the old value. Something misfires in the middle causing: > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.job.split.file is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.splitfile > 09/12/01 00:00:15 WARN conf.Configuration: mapred.map.tasks is deprecated. Instead, use mapreduce.job.maps > But my reduces got stuck at 2 maps / 12 when there were only 2 maps in the job. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7542-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 19:50:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39760 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 10232 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10129 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10120 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:50:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1326.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:50:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LJnprE005324 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:49:51 GMT Message-ID: <25932594.123041271879391214.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:49:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859502#action_12859502 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6658: ----------------------------------- I'd like to commit this soon, since it makes it easier to check API compatibility changes in HADOOP-6668 and MAPREDUCE-1623. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7543-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 20:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48632 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 28261 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28223 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28215 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:06:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:06:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LK5oZl005444 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:05:50 GMT Message-ID: <18252373.123271271880350772.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:05:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6676) Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs In-Reply-To: <1601380660.663491270231707182.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859507#action_12859507 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6676: ----------------------------------- Another approach would be to write an Ant task, or Maven mojo to enforce this. This is the approach taken by Kohsuke Kawaguchi for Hudson: http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2010/04/09/potd-custom-access-modifier, http://github.com/kohsuke/access-modifier. > Create a javac plugin that produces warnings for programs using Evolving APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6676 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6676 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Tom White > > Such a feature would be useful to enforce MAPREDUCE-1637. It might also be useful for users who wish to check their programs don't use Evolving APIs. > It could be implemented using an annotation processor: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/javac.html#processing -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7544-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 21:25:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94992 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 21:25:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 21:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 39552 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:25:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39487 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:25:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39479 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 21:25:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:25:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:25:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LLOouQ006027 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:24:50 GMT Message-ID: <19074730.124271271885090214.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:24:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7545-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 21:27:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96080 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 21:27:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 41136 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41025 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41017 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:27:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1325.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:27:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LLQpS0006057 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:26:51 GMT Message-ID: <28500938.124371271885211841.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:26:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch, HADOOP-6719.3.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7546-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 21:27:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96137 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 21:27:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 41204 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41167 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41159 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 21:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:27:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LLQocc006039 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:26:50 GMT Message-ID: <3685864.124311271885210502.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:26:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rodrigo Schmidt (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rodrigo Schmidt updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6719.3.patch Eclipse had added a bad import to the file. Submitting a new patch. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch, HADOOP-6719.3.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7547-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 21:53:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13216 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 21:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 21:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 78215 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:53:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78186 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 21:53:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78178 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 21:53:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:53:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1326.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:53:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LLqoNN006332 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:52:50 GMT Message-ID: <32158828.124931271886770141.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:52:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859540#action_12859540 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6719: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442481/HADOOP-6719.3.patch against trunk revision 936463. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/471/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/471/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/471/console This message is automatically generated. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch, HADOOP-6719.3.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7548-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 22:15:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25550 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 3314 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3249 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3241 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1327.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:15:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LMEpu9006611 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:14:52 GMT Message-ID: <21252162.125531271888091709.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:14:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6685) Change the generic serialization framework API to use serialization-specific bytes instead of Map for configuration In-Reply-To: <328977938.18921270574733630.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859550#action_12859550 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6685: -------------------------------------- Different serializations currently use common keys to share parts of their configuration data. For example, many name a class that implements the serialization. Several name a class that represents the instances. The code that accesses these properties is shared, either through a common base class or a utility class. Binary blobs can also be considerably more fragile than a Map. If we wish the versions of clients and servers to be able to vary, then blobs stored in configurations must be version-tolerant, i.e., written and read with a fairly sophisticated serialization system. > Change the generic serialization framework API to use serialization-specific bytes instead of Map for configuration > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6685 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6685 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > > Currently, the generic serialization framework uses Map for the serialization specific configuration. Since this data is really internal to the specific serialization, I think we should change it to be an opaque binary blob. This will simplify the interface for defining specific serializations for different contexts (MAPREDUCE-1462). It will also move us toward having serialized objects for Mappers, Reducers, etc (MAPREDUCE-1183). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7549-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 22:21:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28537 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 10116 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10046 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10038 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1327.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LMKqnj006747 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:20:52 GMT Message-ID: <10828799.125911271888452063.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:20:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859555#action_12859555 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6698: -------------------------------------- This issue is fundamentally about backing out changes related to HADOOP-1126, since you've rejected that patch. In that light, HADOOP-6420, HADOOP-6438 and HADOOP-6443 should perhaps also be backed out. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7550-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 22:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28585 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10226 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10183 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10175 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1327.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LMKrSA006780 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:20:53 GMT Message-ID: <2216479.126021271888453547.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:20:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmytro Molkov updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6713.patch Please have a look. We did the same change on hadoop-0.20 and ran it for a day under heavy write and read load on the test cluster. The unittest included just reruns the TestRCP with multiple number of reader threads > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7551-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 22:29:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34413 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 21844 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21734 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21723 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1326.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:29:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LMSoe3006864 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:28:51 GMT Message-ID: <29127622.126151271888930649.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:28:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859559#action_12859559 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------- +1 Looks good. > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch, HADOOP-6719.3.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7552-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 22:29:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34664 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22336 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22308 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22300 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:29:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1327.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:29:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LMSrox006912 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:28:53 GMT Message-ID: <22402204.126311271888933638.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:28:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859562#action_12859562 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- Doug, I think you mean MAPREDUCE-1126 (not HADOOP-1126). Also HADOOP-6323 needs backing out. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7553-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 21 23:03:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51880 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62340 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62311 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62302 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:03:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:03:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3LN2o4O007255 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:02:50 GMT Message-ID: <13963626.126891271890970356.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:02:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present In-Reply-To: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-6716: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6716-BP20-3.patch for previous version, not for commit > System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6716 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6716-BP20-3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7554-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:02:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81236 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 6255 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6225 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6217 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:02:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:02:18 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M01vAI007659 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:01:57 GMT Message-ID: <19139700.127831271894516991.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:01:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6698.patch Here's a patch which reverts all these changes. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7555-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:02:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81278 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 6385 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6358 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6350 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:02:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:02:19 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M01wi9007692 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:01:58 GMT Message-ID: <25808015.127941271894518253.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:01:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7556-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84307 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:08:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 10505 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:08:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10467 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:08:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10459 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:08:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1327.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:08:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M07sN7007775 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:07:54 GMT Message-ID: <18309610.128141271894874307.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:07:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmytro Molkov updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 (was: 0.20.0) (was: 0.20.1) (was: 0.20.2) > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7557-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:28:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3614 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:28:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 28931 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28893 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 28885 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1328.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:28:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M0RpfM007970 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:27:51 GMT Message-ID: <17221086.128401271896071834.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present In-Reply-To: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik reassigned HADOOP-6716: -------------------------------------- Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6716 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6716-BP20-3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7558-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:28:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4090 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 29449 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29411 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29403 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:28:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:28:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:28:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M0Rsxr008009 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:27:54 GMT Message-ID: <28124216.128531271896074072.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:27:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859599#action_12859599 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6713: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442483/HADOOP-6713.patch against trunk revision 936463. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/49/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/49/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/49/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/49/console This message is automatically generated. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7559-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 00:30:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5147 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 00:30:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 00:30:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 31013 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30949 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 00:30:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30941 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 00:30:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:30:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:30:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M0TsmV008078 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:29:54 GMT Message-ID: <19620632.128671271896194065.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:29:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859601#action_12859601 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442493/HADOOP-6698.patch against trunk revision 936463. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 2 new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/472/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/472/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/472/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/472/console This message is automatically generated. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7560-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 01:16:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16296 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 01:16:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 01:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 70064 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 01:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69762 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 01:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69754 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 01:16:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:16:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1328.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:16:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M1Fo5a008938 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:15:50 GMT Message-ID: <10283915.129251271898950060.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:15:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present In-Reply-To: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859616#action_12859616 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6716: -------------------------------------------- + 1 patch looks good. One small nit: {noformat} + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Can't get Kerberos configuration",ke); {noformat} put a whitespace after comma. However, it might be considered like a formatting change from the previous state of the code. So, it's up to you. > System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6716 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6716-BP20-3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7561-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 03:11:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32812 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 03:11:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 03:11:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 44813 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 03:11:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44697 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 03:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44689 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 03:11:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:11:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:11:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M3AoWp009752 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:10:51 GMT Message-ID: <16084720.130061271905850584.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:10:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jeff Hammerbacher (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs In-Reply-To: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859633#action_12859633 ] Jeff Hammerbacher commented on HADOOP-6714: ------------------------------------------- Sorry, linked an issue in the wrong window and can't figure out how to delete the link. This issue is in no way related to HDFS-1051. > FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-6714.patch > > > Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). > It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7562-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 06:27:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61564 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 06:27:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 06:27:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 44477 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 06:27:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44359 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 06:27:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44346 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 06:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:27:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M6QoDu011386 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:26:50 GMT Message-ID: <23283278.132111271917610036.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:26:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859680#action_12859680 ] Ravi Gummadi commented on HADOOP-6715: -------------------------------------- Right Hemanth. People wouldn't expect toString() to give serialized string of object. We can have our own messages in it. Will modify AccessControlList.toString() itself to give "ALL USERS" and "NONE" for "\*" and empty acl cases. > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security, util > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7563-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 09:30:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1316 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 09:30:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 09:30:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 78034 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77090 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76961 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 09:30:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:30:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:30:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M9ToL9013553 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:29:50 GMT Message-ID: <20025730.135761271928590041.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:29:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Subramaniam Krishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6720) 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JT UI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JT UI ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6720 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6720 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: New Feature Environment: all Reporter: Subramaniam Krishnan Assignee: Subramaniam Krishnan Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.19.0 It is not possible, via APIs, to know if a job has been killed, only that has not been successful. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7564-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 09:34:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2413 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 09:34:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 09:34:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 83737 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:34:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83646 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 09:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83637 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 09:34:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:34:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:34:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3M9XncC013585 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:33:50 GMT Message-ID: <11455475.135791271928829851.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:33:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Subramaniam Krishnan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6720) 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JobTracker UI In-Reply-To: <20025730.135761271928590041.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Subramaniam Krishnan updated HADOOP-6720: ----------------------------------------- Summary: 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JobTracker UI (was: 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JT UI) Hadoop Flags: (was: [Reviewed]) Issue Type: Bug (was: New Feature) Assignee: (was: Subramaniam Krishnan) Fix Version/s: 0.20.2 (was: 0.19.0) Affects Version/s: 0.20.1 Priority: Major (was: Critical) Description: The JobTracker UI shows both Failed/Killed Jobs as Failed. The Killed job status has been separated from Failed as part of HADOOP-3924, so the UI needs to be updated to reflect the same. was: It is not possible, via APIs, to know if a job has been killed, only that has not been successful. > 'Killed' jobs and 'Failed' jobs should be displayed seperately in JobTracker UI > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6720 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6720 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.20.1 > Environment: all > Reporter: Subramaniam Krishnan > Fix For: 0.20.2 > > > The JobTracker UI shows both Failed/Killed Jobs as Failed. The Killed job status has been separated from Failed as part of HADOOP-3924, so the UI needs to be updated to reflect the same. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7565-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 15:40:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20911 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 15:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 15:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 67620 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 15:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67413 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 15:40:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67077 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 15:40:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:40:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:40:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MFdrrq016694 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:39:53 GMT Message-ID: <30086789.139961271950793498.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:39:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859848#action_12859848 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6713: ------------------------------------------ +1 code looks good. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7566-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 17:04:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54941 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 17:04:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 17:04:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 48197 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:04:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47739 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:04:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47729 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 17:04:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:04:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1332.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:04:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MH3oPY017772 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:03:51 GMT Message-ID: <29523020.142331271955830599.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:03:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6716) System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present In-Reply-To: <19456845.94831271789690859.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859901#action_12859901 ] Boris Shkolnik commented on HADOOP-6716: ---------------------------------------- will do in trunk commit. > System won't start in non-secure mode when kerb5.conf (edu.mit.kerberos on Mac) is not present > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6716 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6716 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6716-BP20-3.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7567-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 17:10:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58222 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 17:10:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 17:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 60885 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:10:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60856 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 17:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60848 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 17:10:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1332.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:10:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MH9sBb017873 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:09:54 GMT Message-ID: <13322819.142611271956194604.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:09:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Koji Noguchi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859905#action_12859905 ] Koji Noguchi commented on HADOOP-6713: -------------------------------------- Nice. Any performance numbers ? > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7568-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 18:18:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99885 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68617 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68591 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68583 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:18:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:18:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MIHqws018667 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:17:53 GMT Message-ID: <14958301.144581271960272442.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:17:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859935#action_12859935 ] Dmytro Molkov commented on HADOOP-6713: --------------------------------------- We were running performance test on our test cluster. The test itself is creating a tree of directories with files on the leafs in a depths first search fashion: there is a root and we create N directories in the root directory for the test, each mapper then starts in one of those directories and creates its own subtree with files on the leafs. Then there is a read job that for each mapper does ls on the directory, chooses random element in ls, if it is a directory then repeat if it is a file then do read on the file. The files are 4K in size so the read time is small and we are mostly hitting the namenode with this job. We were running the branch that had this fix and it also had read write locks for namenode instead of synchronized sections. The version without fixes could only get namenode to use 175% cpu. With fixes in place we were using 750% cpu for read only load (when the second job was running on its own and 550% for read-write load when two jobs were running in parallel. In the read-write mode the ration of reads to writes was 8:1 (800 read clients vs 100 write clients). We are not putting the read-write locks in production in this iteration, seems we feel like we need to do more testing on it. As soon as I have some results for the branch with this fix only I will post my findings here. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7569-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 18:48:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23050 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 18:48:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 18:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22595 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 18:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22564 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 18:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22556 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 18:48:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:48:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1333.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:48:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MIlpif018980 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:47:51 GMT Message-ID: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:47:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses -------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6721 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Owen O'Malley Assignee: Owen O'Malley We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7570-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 19:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45024 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 99440 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99392 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99381 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:24:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:24:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MJNoIB019333 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:23:50 GMT Message-ID: <32027091.146181271964230347.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6674: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch Attaching a patch fixing a bug. This patch is on top of the earlier patch - http://tinyurl.com/2beueg9. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7571-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 19:36:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50798 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 15521 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15490 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15481 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1333.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:36:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MJZnLL019417 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:35:49 GMT Message-ID: <22005334.146291271964949915.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:35:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6718) Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation In-Reply-To: <15471232.100441271806549356.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6718: -------------------------------- Attachment: 6718-bp20.patch Attaching a patch for Y20S. Not for commit. > Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6718 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6718 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6718-bp20.patch > > > setupSaslConnection in the RPC client might fail to successfully set up a sasl connection (e.g. if the principal is wrongly configured). It throws an exception back to the caller (setupIOstreams). setupIOstreams marks the connection as closed but it doesn't really close the socket. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7572-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:20:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74536 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 92218 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92176 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92168 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:22 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKK0a2019962 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:00 GMT Message-ID: <33423659.147481271967600460.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859992#action_12859992 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- Sanjay> Moving to Avro IDL will change many data types in our servers and cannot be pluggable. Sanjay> I don't think we can split the HDFS protocols as they use many common data types (block-id, block-token, etc). I agree that it may not be easy to do this incrementally, but I think it would be much easier than trying to do it in a branch. For example, existing datatypes like Block that are used in many protocols could be made to implement Avro's SpecificRecord interface so that both IDL and reflect-based code can use them. Then we could more easily consider porting protocols one-by-one. Once we've ported all protocols that use Block, then we could, as a single patch, replace it with an IDL-generated version. Eric> If we can get to agreement that the current RPC remains the default and that IDL work happens in a branch and that only after we have a reasonably complete backwards compat solution do we change to AVRO RPC by default, then I think we are good. If Avro reflect-based RPC passes all tests, including performance, reliability, etc., why wouldn't we switch to it? Even without using an IDL, this would let client and server versions differ. We certainly don't want to encourage independent 3rd party implementations of protocols until we're happy that the protocols are what we intend to support long-term, but I don't yet see a reason not to switch once Avro-based RPC is functionally equivalent. Eric> My concern is not with the already committed plugability, but with the change of the default RPC and incremental change over of the protocols. Once that work starts, we are committed to finishing it and we can not do that in the timeframe of the next release IMO. I don't follow. If we proceed incrementally, thoroughly testing changes before committing them, then we should be able to release at any time, no? Eric> Would we keep the plugable API once we make the transition? I see no reason to keep it. Folks are welcome to start IDL-based branch(es) if they prefer to operate that way. In that case, I will cease work on support for an incremental approach, as it would be redundant. I fear that, since such branches would be long-lived that they'll prove very painful to maintain, especially if they make substantial changes to protocols. We should not prohibit trunk changes to the HDFS and MapReduce protocols. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7573-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:20:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74608 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 92371 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92344 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92336 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1333.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKK5Ta020056 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:05 GMT Message-ID: <13154941.147791271967605388.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7574-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:20:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74719 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 92610 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92585 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92577 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:25 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKK3hJ020023 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:03 GMT Message-ID: <15837320.147681271967603921.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6698.patch > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7575-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:20:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74735 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:20:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 92743 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92718 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92710 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1333.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:26 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKK6tU020089 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:20:06 GMT Message-ID: <9814883.147901271967606639.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7576-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:37:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84057 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 19305 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19283 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19275 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:37:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:37:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKarSF020306 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:36:53 GMT Message-ID: <10337309.148251271968613581.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:36:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859998#action_12859998 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442620/HADOOP-6698.patch against trunk revision 936463. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/473/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/473/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/473/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/473/console This message is automatically generated. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7578-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:51:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92185 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 44860 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44822 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44791 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:51:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKootq020418 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:50:50 GMT Message-ID: <25286480.148431271969450271.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:50:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6658) Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc In-Reply-To: <995349254.452871269404067173.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6658: ------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. > Exclude Private elements from generated Javadoc > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6658 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6658 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch, HADOOP-6658.patch > > > Packages, classes and methods that are marked with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation should not appear in the public Javadoc. Developer Javadoc generated using the "javadoc-dev" ant target should continue to generate Javadoc for all program elements. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7577-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 20:51:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92175 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 44443 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44396 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44225 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 20:51:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:51:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:51:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MKoqi4020430 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:50:52 GMT Message-ID: <28929584.148471271969452644.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6718) Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation In-Reply-To: <15471232.100441271806549356.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860005#action_12860005 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6718: ------------------------------------- Seems reasonable. +1. > Client does not close connection when an exception happens during SASL negotiation > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6718 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6718 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Assignee: Devaraj Das > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: 6718-bp20.patch > > > setupSaslConnection in the RPC client might fail to successfully set up a sasl connection (e.g. if the principal is wrongly configured). It throws an exception back to the caller (setupIOstreams). setupIOstreams marks the connection as closed but it doesn't really close the socket. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7579-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:15:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5586 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 78579 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78547 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78539 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:15:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:15:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLEpMk020707 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:14:51 GMT Message-ID: <33482592.148961271970891438.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:14:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860017#action_12860017 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- To help evaluate this work, I've patched JDiff to add an {{-incompatible}} option, which only shows incompatible differences. (In fact it shows some false positives too. That is, changes that are in fact compatible.) Using this patched JDiff (patch is at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2990626&group_id=37160&atid=419055#), I have produced a diff between 0.20 and trunk with both the patch for this issue, and HADOOP-6709 applied (I backported the annotations from HADOOP-5073, and the patch for this issue to 0.20): http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/jdiff/changes.html There are no significant differences here, so I believe that this patch is ready to be committed. (Note that the changes in org.apache.hadoop.io will disappear once HADOOP-6698 is in.) I'd appreciate it if someone could review this change. Thanks. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7580-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:19:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7472 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 85889 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85857 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85849 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:19:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:19:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLIqYH020767 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:18:52 GMT Message-ID: <9795980.149101271971132311.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:18:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6721: ---------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-security-logo.jpg > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7581-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:25:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10384 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 92591 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92484 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92476 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:25:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:25:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLOpbW020851 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:24:51 GMT Message-ID: <17651772.149321271971491537.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:24:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-6721: ---------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-helmet.jpg Hairong's daughter drew up an armored elephant that is cute. > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7582-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:33:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14185 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3798 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3689 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3681 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLWrFA020957 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:32:54 GMT Message-ID: <12617116.149581271971973974.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:32:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860026#action_12860026 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- | But that schema can be just "bytes". Of course. And Sqoop would use such a file in this manner. But in building a feature into Avro's file format, would it be possible to include a {{getRecordAsByteStream()}} / {{getRecordAsCharStream()}} that makes sense in the context of a file where many underlying schemata don't necessarily make sense in a byte-wise form? | True. Would this be hard to add? :smile: You'd be in a better position than I to comment on that. As for the common/sqoop question: I have written prototype code that provides this file format in Sqoop itself, but I haven't pushed it out yet. If it's infeasible to add this to Hadoop common, then I'll continue to polish that prototype code and just include it directly in Sqoop. However in discussion with other engineers, it's come up that such a very-large-record format may have broader applications than just Sqoop. Furthermore, people will want to use inputformats, etc., that operate over these records. Folks could link against Sqoop's jar to get to these file formats and InputFormat classes, but that's One More Dependency that they may not want to manage. Given that these records are just byte or character streams, it doesn't seem necessary to restrict it to just Sqoop. Also the ability to expand the scope of an existing format to encapsulate these records could lower maintenance costs over time for clients who are storing data in this format. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7584-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:33:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14244 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 3993 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3956 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3869 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLWsw7020979 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:32:54 GMT Message-ID: <33218351.149651271971974710.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:32:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860027#action_12860027 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6721: --------------------------------------- I'll start a thread on general to call for an approval vote from the PMC. Clearly, I'm proposing hadoop-security-logo.jpg and not Hairong's daughter's picture. > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7583-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:33:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14223 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3873 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3823 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3815 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLWpU5020915 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:32:52 GMT Message-ID: <16330637.149441271971971645.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:32:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860025#action_12860025 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6721: ------------------------------------- +1 > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7585-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:37:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16332 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12255 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12229 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12221 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:37:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:37:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLapIm021029 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:36:51 GMT Message-ID: <19808990.149731271972211466.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:36:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860028#action_12860028 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6721: ------------------------------------------ I dunno, Owen. The hadoop-security-logo seems awfully polished to properly represent Hadoop. ;) > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7586-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 21:43:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 19403 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 21904 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21866 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21858 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:43:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:43:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MLgqBp021094 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:42:52 GMT Message-ID: <18773525.149891271972572277.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:42:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860033#action_12860033 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6721: -------------------------------------- Where would this be used? Do you expect there to be a separate secure releases for Hadoop? As Hadoop becomes secure, wouldn't we simply continue to use the existing logo? > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7587-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 22:43:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51244 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 77408 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77379 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77371 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1334.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:43:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MMgopD026537 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:42:50 GMT Message-ID: <24753137.150651271976170499.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:42:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6690) FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes In-Reply-To: <294275186.4281270693056872.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6690: ------------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks Rodrigo! > FilterFileSystem doesn't overwrite setTimes > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6690 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6690 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6690.0.patch, HADOOP-6690.1.patch, HADOOP-6690.2.patch > > > FilterFileSystem seems to be a little outdated and it doesn't implement a few methods (setTimes being the most important one): > - setTimes(Path, long, long) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean,boolean, Path, Path) > - copyFromLocalFile(boolean, boolean, Path[], Path) > - getUsed() > - deleteOnExit() > I'm not sure if all of these methods should be wrapped in FilterFileSystem, but given its purpose, I would say the more the better. It would be great to have other people's opinions about this. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7588-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 22:49:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55000 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 86808 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86773 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86765 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1333.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,FB_GET_MEDS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:49:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MMmrPJ026858 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:48:53 GMT Message-ID: <22041265.150871271976533634.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:48:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6719) Missing methods on FilterFs In-Reply-To: <18354396.102631271811350896.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] dhruba borthakur updated HADOOP-6719: ------------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks Rodrigo! > Missing methods on FilterFs > --------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6719 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6719 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Rodrigo Schmidt > Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6719.0.patch, HADOOP-6719.1.patch, HADOOP-6719.2.patch, HADOOP-6719.3.patch > > > The following methods are not declared on FilterFs(). Some of them are fine, but others like getUri(), getStatistics(), getHomeDirectory() look like they should be there. > Here is the complete list: > {code} > { > public FSDataInputStream open(final Path f) { return null; } > public void checkPath(Path path) { } > public Statistics getStatistics() { return null; } > public URI getUri() { return null; } > public Path getHomeDirectory() { return null; } > public void checkScheme(URI uri, String supportedScheme) { } > public String getUriPath(final Path p) { return null; } > public void renameInternal(final Path src, final Path dst, boolean overwrite) { } > public FsStatus getFsStatus(final Path f) { return null; } > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7589-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 22:49:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55122 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 22:49:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 87081 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87032 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87024 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 22:49:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:49:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:49:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MMmrZw026846 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:48:53 GMT Message-ID: <17611730.150831271976533242.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:48:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860051#action_12860051 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6674: --------------------------------------- Two comments: 1. Don't bother with useSasl and just use useWrap. useWrap implies useSasl. 2. I don't think you correctly handle the case of pings when useWrap is true. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7590-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 22 22:55:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58719 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 92029 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92006 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91998 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:55:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:55:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3MMsp5f015272 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:54:51 GMT Message-ID: <6608937.151151271976891684.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:54:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860056#action_12860056 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6708: -------------------------------------- > would it be possible to include a getRecordAsByteStream() / getRecordAsCharStream() What might be simpler is to implement a DatumReader that only works when the schema is "bytes" and whose #read() implementation returns a clone of BinaryDecoder#getInputStream(). You'd want to use a "direct" binary decoder and pass it an input stream implementation that you know how to clone. Then you could use the vanilla DataFileReader, seek to entries and read them. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7591-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 01:10:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94831 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 261 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 234 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 226 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:10:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:10:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N19oNg003785 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:09:50 GMT Message-ID: <12583703.152991271984990100.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:09:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-3207) Add .externalToolBuilders to svn:ignore list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Edward J. Yoon resolved HADOOP-3207. ------------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix won't fix > Add .externalToolBuilders to svn:ignore list > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3207 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3207 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Edward J. Yoon > > Could you, please, .externalToolBuilders to svn:ignores? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7592-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 01:40:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5462 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12492 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12455 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12447 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:40:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1335.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:40:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N1dq65004050 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:39:52 GMT Message-ID: <5204273.153441271986792009.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:39:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6674: -------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch Attaching a slightly modified version of the earlier patch. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7593-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 01:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7181 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 15335 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15306 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15298 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:42:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1335.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:42:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N1fp04004071 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:41:51 GMT Message-ID: <2070758.153511271986911071.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:41:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860098#action_12860098 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-6674: ------------------------------------- In response to Owen's comment (2), the case of pings when useWrap is true is handled within processUnwrappedData (since the Pings are also wrapped and sent from the client) > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7594-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 07:14:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82606 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 07:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 07:14:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 57850 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:14:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57725 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:14:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57716 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 07:14:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1336.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:14:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N7DpXk006998 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:13:51 GMT Message-ID: <21303456.156191272006831455.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:13:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7595-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 07:16:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83176 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 07:16:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 07:16:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 58929 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:16:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58824 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:16:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58816 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 07:16:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:16:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1336.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:16:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N7Fo6S007021 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:15:50 GMT Message-ID: <26701754.156221272006950204.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:15:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7596-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 07:38:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87024 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 07:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 07:38:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78319 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:38:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78188 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 07:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78179 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 07:38:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:38:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1336.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:38:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N7bnQT007175 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:37:50 GMT Message-ID: <6335111.156461272008269810.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:37:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860159#action_12860159 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6686: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441321/HADOOP-6686.1.patch against trunk revision 937093. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/474/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/474/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/474/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/474/console This message is automatically generated. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7597-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 08:10:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 92592 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 08:10:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 08:10:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 10715 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 08:10:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10604 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 08:10:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10384 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 08:10:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:10:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N89pSt007430 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:09:51 GMT Message-ID: <17944576.156691272010191201.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:09:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6686) Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client In-Reply-To: <70650712.27801270591413554.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6686: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] Release Note: The exceptions thrown by the RPC client no longer carries a redundant exception class name in exception message. Resolution: Fixed Tests are not included in this patch, since it is covered in HDFS-1083. I committed this patch. > Remove redundant exception class name in unwrapped exceptions thrown at the RPC client > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6686 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6686 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Environment: At RPC client, when the exception thrown by the server is unwrapped, the exception message includes redundant exception class name. This redundant information should be removed. > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6686.1.patch, HADOOP-6686.patch > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7598-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 11:25:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36268 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 11:25:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 11:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 99725 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 11:25:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99609 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 11:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99600 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 11:25:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:25:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1337.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:25:21 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NBP0tW009329 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:25:01 GMT Message-ID: <3847588.159671272021900884.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:25:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "eric baldeschwieler (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860220#action_12860220 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------------- Hi Doug, I do not support an incremental approach of protocol porting. The idea of supporting parallel impementations of our current hdfs protocols is mind boggling, as you've told me several times during Hadoop's development. All of this change would be a huge tax on folks trying to stabilize Hadoop for release. I agree doing this in a branch would be a huge job. This project is a huge job. That is my concern. It's not fair on the community to implicitly sign us all up to finish something of this scale. If you are signing up to do the project, great! We will help you close once you can demonstrate you are close to the finish line. I don't support throwing the whole community into a state where we need to finish this to ship good releases before anyone understands how we are going to finish it or who will finish it or how much work it will be. Thanks for taking the time to understand my concerns! --- E14 - via iPhone On Apr 22, 2010, at 1:21 PM, "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7599-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 15:25:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99820 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 14547 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14494 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14486 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:25:21 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NFOxDm011244 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:24:59 GMT Message-ID: <11889170.162261272036299545.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:24:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "Arun C Murthy (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860274#action_12860274 ] Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-6659: --------------------------------------- Doug, the concern I have is that doing an incremental approach i.e. protocol-by-protocol, exposes us to the risk that a late-breaking bug will leave the projects (HDFS/Map-Reduce) in a state where we can't move forward or back since we have too many changes. I'm sure you see this. Having said that I do understand it's harder to this in a branch. However, you will find a lot of support to ease the pain - I would be willing to volunteer to help on the Map-Reduce IDL work in the branch, I'm sure we will find others willing to pitch in for HDFS etc. That way we could get the system working end-to-end with Avro, test at scale and merge switch swiftly. Does that sounds reasonable? > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7601-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 17:11:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2857 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 17:11:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 17:11:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 80609 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 17:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80575 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 17:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80567 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 17:05:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1338.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:05:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NH4uHw012329 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:04:56 GMT Message-ID: <26998253.164551272042296914.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:04:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860316#action_12860316 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- > I would be willing to volunteer to help on the Map-Reduce IDL work in the branch I am happy to kibitz on a branch. But I would only embrace a branched strategy if I felt I could dedicate myself full-time to that one effort together with similarly dedicated colleagues so that the branch time could be minimized. Unfortunately, I cannot dedicate myself full-time to such an endeavor. If others can, then they might pursue this, but I cannot in good faith, but would still be happy to assist how I can and will certainly not be an obstacle to such a plan. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7600-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 17:26:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15351 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 17:25:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 17:25:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 68838 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 16:59:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68780 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 16:59:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68771 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 16:59:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:59:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1338.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:59:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NGwuOJ012149 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:58:57 GMT Message-ID: <5636395.164091272041936805.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:58:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6659) Switch RPC to use Avro In-Reply-To: <387448273.476441269469290584.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860312#action_12860312 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6659: -------------------------------------- > exposes us to the risk that a late-breaking bug will leave the projects (HDFS/Map-Reduce) in a state where we can't move forward or back We should test each change thoroughly before we commit it. We should not commit changes we feel are excessively risky and insufficiently tested. I do not propose committing any changes that are not agreed to be safe. Changing the serialization used for RPC is not a change in semantics, it's a change in syntax. As such, this change alone should not introduce any deep bugs. It may introduce NullPointerException-like bugs, but these are generally easy to fix. It should not introduce any new synchronization or other logic bugs. Thus I think the chance of a deep bug that goes undetected and will take a great investment to fix is minimal. If others disagree and wish to develop this as a branch they are welcome to do so, but I do not think we should freeze changes to protocols in trunk while they work in this branch. > Switch RPC to use Avro > ---------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6659 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6659 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > This is an umbrella issue for moving HDFS and MapReduce RPC to use Avro. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7602-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 18:09:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40328 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 58928 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58892 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58884 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:09:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:09:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NI8ofu012779 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:08:50 GMT Message-ID: <3767164.165361272046130535.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6710: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1. Looks excellent. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7603-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 18:13:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42083 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 67915 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67875 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67866 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:13:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NICp4Y012839 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:12:51 GMT Message-ID: <7062082.165511272046371574.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:12:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6521: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] If we're - correctly - not using the deprecatedKeyWasSet method, and this was the only place it was used and it's not yet been released, might we just as well remove it? Otherwise it's an unused, potentially buggy API. Otherwise, +1. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7604-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 19:29:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64596 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 44951 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44915 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44907 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:29:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:29:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NJSoAf013359 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:28:50 GMT Message-ID: <10358602.166501272050930194.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:28:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860356#action_12860356 ] Ravi Phulari commented on HADOOP-6701: -------------------------------------- This fix will change the way {{ch(mod/own/grp)}} returns exit codes. Failure to execute chmod, chown, chgrp commands will return non zero exit code with an error message. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-20s.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7605-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 20:54:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96206 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 20:54:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 20:54:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62135 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62092 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 20:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62060 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 20:54:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:54:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:54:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NKrpk8013759 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:53:52 GMT Message-ID: <18050830.167121272056031914.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:53:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6710: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7606-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:10:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3072 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 84884 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84798 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84790 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:10:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:10:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NL9owg013880 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:09:50 GMT Message-ID: <20764211.167321272056990295.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:09:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701-20s.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7607-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:12:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3758 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 85847 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85795 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85784 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:12:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:12:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLBnOY013895 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:11:50 GMT Message-ID: <13145260.167351272057109857.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:11:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7608-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:18:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5323 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 92849 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92820 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92812 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:18:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:18:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLHqJM013968 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:17:52 GMT Message-ID: <30409191.167551272057472053.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:17:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701.patch Patch for 0.20. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7609-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:22:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6316 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 1035 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 999 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 991 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:22:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:22:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLLoM3013995 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:21:50 GMT Message-ID: <31815083.167611272057710545.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:21:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6674) Performance Improvement in Secure RPC In-Reply-To: <375873020.645441270163787224.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860379#action_12860379 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6674: --------------------------------------- The new patch looks good. > Performance Improvement in Secure RPC > ------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6674 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6674 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.bugfix.patch, HADOOP-6674-y20.1.patch > > > This jira introduces two performance improvements in Sasl RPC > 1. Setting of Sasl 'quality of protection' to authentication only. > 2. Addition of BufferedOutputStream underneath SaslOutputStream. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7610-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:28:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7362 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10239 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10204 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10196 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:28:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:28:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLRo0S014036 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:27:51 GMT Message-ID: <4908349.167711272058070731.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:27:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6521.patch Removed deprecateKeyWasSet() method and related tests. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7611-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:28:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7408 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10386 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10338 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10330 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:28:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:28:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLRpuQ014054 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:27:51 GMT Message-ID: <23667449.167771272058071703.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7612-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:30:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7994 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:30:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 12293 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:30:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12266 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12258 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:30:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:30:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:30:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLTpwi014081 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:29:51 GMT Message-ID: <27600861.167841272058191359.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:29:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6508) Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext In-Reply-To: <1389520400.1361264392034628.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu reassigned HADOOP-6508: ------------------------------- Assignee: Luke Lu > Incorrect values for metrics with CompositeContext > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6508 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6508 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.20.0 > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: CompositeContext-solution.png, CompositeContext.png > > > In our clusters, when we use CompositeContext with two contexts, second context gets wrong values. > This problem is consistent on 500 (and above) node cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7613-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 21:44:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10679 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 21:44:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 21:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20542 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:44:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20458 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 21:44:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20450 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 21:44:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:44:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:44:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLhppS014220 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:43:51 GMT Message-ID: <3132565.168191272059031250.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:43:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860389#action_12860389 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6521: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442708/hadoop-6521.patch against trunk revision 937183. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/50/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/50/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/50/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/50/console This message is automatically generated. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7614-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14407 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 37945 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37914 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:00:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37883 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:00:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:00:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:00:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NLxols014429 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:59:50 GMT Message-ID: <2234490.168681272059990720.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:59:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860395#action_12860395 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6701: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7615-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:08:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15937 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 45583 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45555 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45545 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:08:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:08:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NM7pxo014470 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:07:51 GMT Message-ID: <25096925.168771272060471145.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:07:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Attachment: listStatusItor1.patch Thank Suresh and Eli for review my patch. Those are good feedback. This patch addresses most of the comments except for > FileContext.listStatus() that returns iterator - add information about throwing UnsupportedOperationException and NoSuchElementException in the RuntimeExceptions section on attempt to delete an entry from iterator. Those exceptions are not thrown in listStatus method. Those may be thrown when iterating happens. > AFS.listStatusItertor() - method javadoc should point @link to the right method in FileContext. It points to the right method. It happens that in FileContext the method that returns an iterator is named as listStatus. > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7616-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:08:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15992 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 45747 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45697 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45689 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:08:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:08:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NM7qwh014488 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:07:52 GMT Message-ID: <32279467.168831272060472103.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7617-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16239 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 47337 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47295 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47287 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:10:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:10:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NM9oiK014518 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:09:51 GMT Message-ID: <9889262.168911272060590911.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:09:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6521.1.patch Attaching the right patch. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7618-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:10:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16281 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 47466 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47428 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47420 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:10:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:10:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NM9pe8014536 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:09:51 GMT Message-ID: <9109602.168971272060591846.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:09:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7619-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:19:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17048 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 49869 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49833 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49825 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:19:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:19:27 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NMJ77l014568 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:19:07 GMT Message-ID: <25991305.169041272061147307.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:19:07 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860402#action_12860402 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6710: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441987/hadoop-6710.patch against trunk revision 937183. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/475/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/475/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/475/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/475/console This message is automatically generated. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7620-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:25:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18025 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 55318 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55279 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55265 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:25:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:25:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NMOpKa014625 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:24:51 GMT Message-ID: <28803728.169121272061491153.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:24:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860404#action_12860404 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6521: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442715/hadoop-6521.1.patch against trunk revision 937183. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/51/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/51/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/51/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/51/console This message is automatically generated. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7621-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:55:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23368 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 73087 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73057 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73049 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NMsp5Q014762 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:54:51 GMT Message-ID: <22298101.169331272063291509.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:54:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860410#action_12860410 ] Ravi Phulari commented on HADOOP-6701: -------------------------------------- *This patch changes exit codes returned from chmod, chgrp and chown operations* * Old Behavior of {{chmod,chown,chgrp}} operation. ** If operation is successful then - exit code 0 and no error message. ** If operation is unsuccessful then - exit code 0 and error message printed. {noformat} *If files does not exist and with globbed input* [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chmod 777 st*; echo $? 0 *If files does not exist without globbed input* [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chmod 777 st; echo $? chmod: could not get status for 'st': File does not exist: st 0 *If user does not have permission to change file-permission* ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? chgrp: changing ownership of 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied 0 *If user does not have permission to change file-permission* ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? chown: changing ownership of 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied 0 *If user has permission to change file-permission and file does not exist* ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST 0 {noformat} * New Behavior of {{chmod,chown,chgrp}} operation. ** If operation is successful then - exit code 0 is returned and no error message. ** If operation is unsuccessful then - exit code 1 is returned and error message printed. {noformat} *If file does not exist* [rphulari@lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chown rphulari:users est; echo $? chown: could not get status for 'est': File does not exist: est 1 *If files does not exist and with globbed input* [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chown rphulari:users est\*; echo $? chown: could not get status for 'est*' 1 *If file exist and operation is successful* [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chmod 700 test; echo $? 0 *If file/dir with glob pattern exits and operation is successful* [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -chmod 777 test*; echo $? 0 [rphulari@statepick-lm]> bin/hadoop fs -ls Found 2 items -rw-rw-rw- 1 admin supergroup 0 2010-04-15 13:54 /user/rphulari/t drwxrwxrwx - rphulari userss 0 2010-03-30 23:39 /user/rphulari/test {noformat} *Unchanged behavior - need to be fixed in different Jira* Because following bug is due to Permissions code we will change it in separate Jira . {noformat} *If user does not have permission to change file-permission* ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? chown: changing ownership of 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied 0 {noformat} > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7622-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 22:57:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23643 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 75493 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75386 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 22:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 75376 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 22:57:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:57:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:57:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NMuoNk014787 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:56:50 GMT Message-ID: <31803128.169361272063410068.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:56:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7623-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 23:03:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25153 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 80280 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80260 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80252 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:03:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:03:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NN2oPf014814 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:02:50 GMT Message-ID: <3700062.169411272063770182.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:02:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701.v20s.patch > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701.v20s.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7624-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 23:11:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26138 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 85289 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85266 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85258 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:11:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1339.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:11:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NNAo7x014843 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:10:51 GMT Message-ID: <5807281.169461272064250635.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:10:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7625-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 23:13:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26350 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 85706 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85668 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85660 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:13:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NNCo5f014858 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:12:50 GMT Message-ID: <14595053.169511272064370223.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:12:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7626-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Fri Apr 23 23:39:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31182 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2693 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2586 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2578 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:39:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:39:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3NNcoAh015006 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:38:50 GMT Message-ID: <6113794.169831272065930239.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:38:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860420#action_12860420 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6692: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442712/listStatusItor1.patch against trunk revision 937183. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 9 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/476/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/476/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/476/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/476/console This message is automatically generated. > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7627-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 00:01:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36273 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14855 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14827 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14819 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:01:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O00qFM015169 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:00:52 GMT Message-ID: <16521354.170171272067252691.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:00:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860428#action_12860428 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6692: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7628-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 00:03:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37049 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16694 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16643 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16635 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:03:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1340.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:03:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O02pXH015211 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:02:51 GMT Message-ID: <1908495.170311272067371799.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:02:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I committed this change. > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7629-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 00:15:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38563 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 27857 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27790 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27782 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:15:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1340.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:15:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O0EoiU015291 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:14:50 GMT Message-ID: <22891557.170501272068090266.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:14:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6657) Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 In-Reply-To: <74469463.448561269390627214.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6657: ---------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Resolution: Fixed Thanks! Steve. > Common portion of MAPREDUCE-1545 > -------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6657 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6657 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6657-trunk-v1.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v2.patch, hadoop-6657-trunk-v3.patch > > > Common portion of the MAPREDUCE-1545. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7630-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 02:06:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65510 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70018 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69990 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69981 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:06:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1340.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:06:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O25ou4015847 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:05:50 GMT Message-ID: <16807848.171581272074750214.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:05:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6710: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Resolution: Fixed Committed the patch. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7631-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 02:32:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68947 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 02:32:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 02:32:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 76344 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 02:32:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76304 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 02:32:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76296 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 02:32:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:32:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1340.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:32:23 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O2W3rQ015960 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:32:03 GMT Message-ID: <20065512.171841272076323119.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:32:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6599) Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics In-Reply-To: <230085983.539401267138948106.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860466#action_12860466 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6599: ----------------------------------------- Currently RPC metrics has the following information: Context name *rpc* and record name *metrics* has the following: ||Type||Name of the metrics||Description|| |MetricsTimeVaryingLong|ReceivedBytes|Number of bytes in RPC requests received in reporting period| |MetricsTimeVaryingLong|SentBytes|Number of bytes sent RPC response in reporting period| |MetricsTimeVaryingRate|RpcQueueTime|Time a request spent in queue and rate at which RPC requests are received| |rpcProcessingTime|RpcProcessingTime|Number of RPC request processed and time for processing it| |MetricsIntValue|NumOpenConnections|Number of open connections to the RPC server| |MetricsIntValue|callQueueLen|Length of the RPC queue| |MetricsTimeVaryingInt |rpcAuthenticationFailures|Number of authentication failures at the RPC layer| |MetricsTimeVaryingInt |rpcAuthenticationSuccesses|Number of authentication success at the RPC layer| |MetricsTimeVaryingInt |rpcAuthorizationFailures|Number of authorization failure at the RPC layer| |MetricsTimeVaryingInt |rpcAuthorizationSuccesses|Number of authorization success at the RPC layer| Context name *rpc* and record name *detailed-metrics* has metrics for each RPC method of type and name set to RPC method name. > Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6599 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6599.1.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.rel20.patch > > > Currently RPC metrics tracks items that provides summary of RPC usage along with more detailed per method statistics that tracks number of method calls made, time spent on that call. Combining both summary and detailed together results in large metrics report which metrics collection systems may not handle. Proposal is to split the metrics into summary and detailed metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7632-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 05:12:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6195 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 22344 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22222 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22207 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1341.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O5BqIO017009 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:11:52 GMT Message-ID: <16311048.172771272085912088.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:11:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Attachment: listStatusItor2.patch This patch in addition made a change to TestFilterFs to fix the failed test. > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7633-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 05:12:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6224 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 05:12:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 22395 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22275 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22224 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1341.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O5BrJK017039 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:11:53 GMT Message-ID: <14001529.172871272085913264.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:11:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7634-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 05:12:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6286 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22525 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22500 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 22491 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:12:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O5BqEj017024 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:11:52 GMT Message-ID: <9805562.172821272085912796.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:11:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7635-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 05:40:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8695 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 05:40:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 05:40:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32619 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:40:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32570 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 05:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32562 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 05:40:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:40:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1341.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:40:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O5do0u017116 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:39:50 GMT Message-ID: <32742506.172921272087590373.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:39:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860486#action_12860486 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6692: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442734/listStatusItor2.patch against trunk revision 937577. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/477/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/477/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/477/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/477/console This message is automatically generated. > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7636-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 07:32:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27319 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62312 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62097 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62069 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1341.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O7VoS9017607 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:31:51 GMT Message-ID: <9520812.173691272094310976.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:31:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Issue Type: Test (was: Bug) Affects Version/s: 0.21.0 0.22.0 > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7637-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 07:32:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27328 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62330 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62192 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62071 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 07:32:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1341.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:32:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3O7VpPg017625 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:31:51 GMT Message-ID: <19635654.173751272094311796.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:31:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6521) FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. In-Reply-To: <797058971.135641264793314607.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6521: ------------------------------------ Issue Type: Bug (was: Test) > FsPermission:SetUMask not updated to use new-style umask setting. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6521 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6521 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6521.1.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.1.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch, hadoop-6521.rel20.patch > > > FsPermission: > {code} > 221 /** Set the user file creation mask (umask) */ > 222 public static void setUMask(Configuration conf, FsPermission umask) { > 223 conf.setInt(UMASK_LABEL, umask.toShort()); > 224 } > {code} > Needs to be updated to not use a decimal value. This is a bug introduced by HADOOP-6234. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7638-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 21:34:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48746 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 21:34:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 21:34:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6647 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 21:34:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6581 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 21:34:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6568 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 21:34:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:34:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:34:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3OLXp1q020696 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:33:51 GMT Message-ID: <27568424.177581272144831632.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:33:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860590#action_12860590 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6698: --------------------------------------- bq. This issue is fundamentally about backing out changes related to HADOOP-1126, since you've rejected that patch. In that light, HADOOP-6420, HADOOP-6438 and HADOOP-6443 should perhaps also be backed out. HADOOP-6420 was completed with MAPREDUCE-1126 as a use case, but it's an independent feature. Does it need to be backed out? Also, HADOOP-6438 was closed as invalid, not committed, so fortunately there's nothing to be backed out, there. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7639-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sat Apr 24 23:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10760 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 69662 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69632 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69624 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:42:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1342.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:42:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3ONfokI022307 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:41:51 GMT Message-ID: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:41:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6722 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: util Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7640-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 00:07:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20946 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 76464 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76400 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76390 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:07:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:07:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P06ocf022395 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:06:51 GMT Message-ID: <10039627.178831272154010542.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:06:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6670) UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables In-Reply-To: <242202762.620161270078590059.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das updated HADOOP-6670: -------------------------------- Attachment: 6670-gridmix-test.bugfix.patch Fixes a testcase that got affected by the UGI changes in hashcode/equals methods. > UserGroupInformation doesn't support use in hash tables > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6670 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6670 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: 6670-gridmix-test.bugfix.patch, fs-close.patch, fs-close.patch, fs-close.patch > > > The UserGroupInformation objects are mutable, but they are used as keys in hash tables. This leads to serious problems in the FileSystem cache and RPC connection cache. We need to change the hashCode to be the identity hash code of the Subject and change equals to use == between the Subjects. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7641-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 00:31:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36407 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 83986 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83959 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83951 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:31:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P0Un1l022439 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:30:50 GMT Message-ID: <7630396.178871272155449941.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:30:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6722: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6722.txt Here's a patch which detects this situation and throws a ConnectException. The test case manufactures the problem by binding to an ephemeral port and then trying to connect to itself. (fwiw, I actually did run into this issue while testing hbase under failure injection scenarios - a client tried to open RPC to the hbase server, but got itself instead, and was very unhappy) > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7642-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 00:31:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36462 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 00:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 84132 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84093 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84085 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 00:31:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:31:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:31:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P0UogN022445 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:30:50 GMT Message-ID: <13832946.178891272155450322.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:30:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6722: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7643-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 01:30:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53385 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 97303 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97268 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97260 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:30:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:30:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P1Tohm022580 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:29:50 GMT Message-ID: <4417161.179021272158990520.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:29:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860624#action_12860624 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6722: ----------------------------------- I was bit by this "feature" of TCP in my past life too. :) > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7644-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 02:12:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57339 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 02:12:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 02:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7728 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7720 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 02:12:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:12:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:12:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P2Bond022795 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:11:50 GMT Message-ID: <21334961.179401272161510466.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860631#action_12860631 ] Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-6722: ------------------------------------------ FWIW, I can't duplicate this on Solaris or Mac OS X, both of which are based upon BSD sockets. So I'm guessing this is a bug in the Linux TCP/IP stack. > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7645-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 02:24:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57900 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8314 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8278 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8270 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:24:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:24:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P2No7j022822 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:23:51 GMT Message-ID: <1380569.179441272162230848.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860632#action_12860632 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6722: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442761/hadoop-6722.txt against trunk revision 937577. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/478/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/478/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/478/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/478/console This message is automatically generated. > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7646-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 02:28:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58077 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 8536 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8495 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:28:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1343.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:28:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P2RpAK022840 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:27:51 GMT Message-ID: <32230337.179481272162471140.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860633#action_12860633 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6722: ----------------------------------- http://www.rampa.sk/static/tcpLoopConnect.html This is not a bug, but the usefulness of this feature is certainly questionable. > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7647-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 02:32:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 58226 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 10436 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10346 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10338 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:32:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:32:24 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3P2W2MU022858 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:32:02 GMT Message-ID: <32735426.179521272162722554.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:32:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hong Tang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860634#action_12860634 ] Hong Tang commented on HADOOP-6722: ----------------------------------- Also, it seems somebody experienced this problem on freebsd too. http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd.devel.hackers/2002-05/msg00209.html > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7648-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 18:52:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 25954 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 18:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 18:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 94584 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 18:52:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94056 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 18:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94042 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 18:52:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:52:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PIpp0F027168 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:51:51 GMT Message-ID: <23386803.184291272221511446.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:51:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6635) Install or deploy source jars to maven repo In-Reply-To: <1995629254.314101268836107275.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6635: -------------------------------- Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] +1. I manually tested by applying all three of the patches, generating the source jar files, verifying their contents and starting a Maven-based project in Eclipse that depended on the local versions and verifying that Eclipse pulled in the source jars as necessary. This will be a big help. > Install or deploy source jars to maven repo > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6635 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6635 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6635-branch-20.patch, HADOOP-6635.patch > > > Publishing source jars to the local m2 cache or a public maven repo is extremely handy for Hadoop users that want to be able to inspect the Hadoop source from within their IDE. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7649-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 19:08:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33897 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 19:08:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 19:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7172 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7063 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:08:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7055 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 19:08:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:08:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:08:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PJ7pWA027306 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:07:51 GMT Message-ID: <3318692.184581272222470994.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:07:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6635) Install or deploy source jars to maven repo In-Reply-To: <1995629254.314101268836107275.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6635: -------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Assignee: Patrick Angeles Resolution: Fixed I've committed this. Thanks Patrick! Resolving as fixed. > Install or deploy source jars to maven repo > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6635 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6635 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: build > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Patrick Angeles > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6635-branch-20.patch, HADOOP-6635.patch > > > Publishing source jars to the local m2 cache or a public maven repo is extremely handy for Hadoop users that want to be able to inspect the Hadoop source from within their IDE. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7650-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 19:26:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42099 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 12780 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12756 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12748 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:26:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1344.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:26:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PJPngZ027385 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:25:50 GMT Message-ID: <33033218.184741272223549956.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:25:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6723) unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HADOOP-6723 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 If the server sends back some malformed data, for example, receiveResponse() can end up with an incorrect call ID. Then, when it tries to find it in the calls map, it will end up with null and throw NPE in receiveResponse. This isn't caught anywhere, so the original IPC client ends up hanging forever instead of catching an exception. Another example is if the writable implementation itself throws an unchecked exception or OOME. We should catch Throwable in Connection.run() and shut down the connection if we catch one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7651-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 19:30:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 43696 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 14631 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14601 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14593 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:30:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:30:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PJTpaP027408 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:29:51 GMT Message-ID: <31654329.184791272223791041.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:29:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860742#action_12860742 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6722: ------------------------------------- Hudson bot isn't commenting automatically anymore, but results here: hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/478/ [exec] +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment [exec] http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442761/hadoop-6722.txt [exec] against trunk revision 937577. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. [exec] [exec] +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7652-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 19:32:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44538 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 19:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 19:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 16340 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:32:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16310 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 19:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16302 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 19:32:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:32:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1344.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:32:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PJVqX9027429 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:31:52 GMT Message-ID: <6145239.184861272223912226.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:31:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860743#action_12860743 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6722: ------------------------------------- btw, Allen: I was able to reproduce on OSX. It just takes a while sometimes. > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7653-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 21:26:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97696 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 74675 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74645 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74637 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:26:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PLPo79028018 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:25:51 GMT Message-ID: <10656671.186071272230750735.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:25:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6717) Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high In-Reply-To: <5222107.95511271791852375.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6717: -------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed +1. I've committed this. Thanks Todd. Resolving as fixed. > Log levels in o.a.h.security.Groups too high > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6717 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6717.txt > > > The info logs in Groups.java for every getGroups call is causing my unrelated HDFS unit test to run out of memory since it logs so darn much. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7654-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 21:32:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 727 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 77172 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77130 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77122 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:32:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:32:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PLVoSV028069 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:31:50 GMT Message-ID: <25405417.186201272231110495.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:31:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6598) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class In-Reply-To: <1329445528.527921267115907870.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860766#action_12860766 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6598: ------------------------------------- Looks like HADOOP-6717 partially duplicated this work and has been committed. We should update the patch. > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6598 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7655-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 21:32:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 804 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 21:32:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 77323 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77275 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77267 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 21:32:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:32:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:32:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PLVpnX028078 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:31:51 GMT Message-ID: <25454349.186231272231111478.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:31:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6598) Remove verbose logging from the Groups class In-Reply-To: <1329445528.527921267115907870.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan updated HADOOP-6598: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Canceling patch. > Remove verbose logging from the Groups class > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6598 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6598 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6598-BP20-Fix.patch, HADOOP-6598-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6598.patch > > > {quote} > 2010-02-25 08:30:52,269 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:(60)) - Group m > apping impl=org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping; cacheTimeout > =300000 > ... > 2010-02-25 08:30:57,872 INFO security.Groups (Groups.java:getGroups(76)) - Retu > rning cached groups for 'oom' > {quote} > should both be demoted to debug level. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7656-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 21:38:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3086 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 21:38:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 21:38:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 79395 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:38:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79337 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:38:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79329 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 21:38:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:38:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:38:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PLboGu028121 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:37:51 GMT Message-ID: <25037371.186331272231470954.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:37:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860769#action_12860769 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------------- I'm OK with the switch to strings; it'll make the annotation more useful to other projects, as Alan said, and it's not like we have any real control over someone else using the APIs. My concern is more about the possibility of making it optional; For LimitedPrivate, in Hadoop at least, we should always be clear about who we're including. Making the list of targets optional would make LimitedPrivate just a confusing version of Private. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7657-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 21:40:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4001 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 21:40:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 21:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 80246 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80209 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 21:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80201 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 21:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:40:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3PLdpI9028153 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:39:51 GMT Message-ID: <29841784.186411272231591178.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:39:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860770#action_12860770 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------------- So basically, +1 on this patch. Any changes to the semantics of LiimitedPrivate should be hashed out in another JIRA. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7658-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Sun Apr 25 23:52:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59262 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2010 23:52:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2010 23:52:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 17907 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 23:52:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17798 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2010 23:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94419 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2010 22:18:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wangq9@cs.rpi.edu designates 128.113.126.12 as permitted sender) X-Hash: SCtCte|13fe458c8947e3787fd06a3bb5137ff759f170ba|cd1d9aa67da38fb18e385b461386aafa X-SMTP-From: accepted harvestman.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.6.26] (harvestman.cs.rpi.edu) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.rpi.edu; h= message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; i= 128.213.6.26@cs.rpi.edu; t=1272233882; x=1272838682; l=2098; bh= OS1XXAZtRgLx7QaYqEDq/1QHD/Y=; b=qZUfOBaNKO7RU2Y9J7qSwEJiK53Osrpp DpKy8cubHDg0JsBcVRO+nAVLVws2/24OYGbAFcwtEV5qO93q5boiXmei2N2uPlme JIJSWhq42ZwZJfrsYsKxg3YGFDmn7lARk124fPYioFfhUOitT52g9UFOe8sB2Mrr 51bf037dq6E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cs.rpi.edu; h=message-id :date:subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=f/GCLJSvpo9XXOQ+ 70MoCrYxGqjvbsammWWdv35UHyfQDox0qWT6FTYD2YTUeNe2Imkf1uIqjpcvuhWo xy6hnI7Yz8cYAUiLDdo4thsVll6SW1QCw2dOjcimoZ8/AnZwqLGnngI/Td0vHQIK gYI6A5OcdtGDcwG+970Tzm2uOGU= X-Spam-Report: Spam Report from newman.cs.rpi.edu (SA:3.2.5): -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Spam-Info: -2.7, local; ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Scanned-By: newman.cs.rpi.edu using SpamAssassin 3.2.5 X-Virus-Scanned-By: newman.cs.rpi.edu X-Authentication-Warning: harvestman.cs.rpi.edu: httpd set sender to wangq9@cs.rpi.edu using -f Message-ID: <53326.74.70.176.43.1272233879.squirrel@webmail.cs.rpi.edu> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:17:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Cannot lock storage, no datanode From: "Qingling Wang" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 128.113.126.12 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm using Hadoop-0.20.2. I got 3 machines here, one is master and the other two are slaves. When I started all things using bin/start-all.sh, one of the salves cannot start datanode, like this: jps tasktracker And here is the datanode log file of this slave STARTUP_MSG: Starting DataNode STARTUP_MSG: host = juno.mri.cs.rpi.edu/128.213.60.20 STARTUP_MSG: args = [] STARTUP_MSG: version = 0.20.2 STARTUP_MSG: build = https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20 -r 911707; compiled by 'chrisdo' on Fri Feb 19 08:07:34 UTC 2010 ************************************************************/ 2010-04-23 17:46:17,525 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage: Cannot lock storage /projects/wcl-nobackup/hadoop/hdfs/data. The directory is already locked. 2010-04-23 17:46:17,629 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: java.io.IOException: Cannot lock storage /projects/wcl-nobackup/hadoop/hdfs/data. The directory is already locked. at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.lock(Storage.java:510) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.common.Storage$StorageDirectory.analyzeStorage(Storage.java:363) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataStorage.recoverTransitionRead(DataStorage.java:112) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.startDataNode(DataNode.java:298) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.(DataNode.java:216) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.makeInstance(DataNode.java:1283) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.instantiateDataNode(DataNode.java:1238) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.createDataNode(DataNode.java:1246) at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.main(DataNode.java:1368) 2010-04-23 17:46:17,630 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: SHUTDOWN_MSG: /************************************************************ SHUTDOWN_MSG: Shutting down DataNode at juno.mri.cs.rpi.edu/128.213.60.20 Could anyone help with this? Thanks. Hayden From common-issues-return-7659-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:00:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26157 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 66381 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66335 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66327 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:00:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:00:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q1xod4022156 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:59:51 GMT Message-ID: <1785112.186921272247190863.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:59:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Rajiv Chittajallu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6599) Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics In-Reply-To: <230085983.539401267138948106.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860780#action_12860780 ] Rajiv Chittajallu commented on HADOOP-6599: ------------------------------------------- This should probably split at the context level. The current metrics context implementation in hadoop, you can only limit reporting at the context level. > Split RPC metrics into summary and detailed metrics > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6599 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6599 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6599.1.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.2.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.patch, hadoop-6599.rel20.patch > > > Currently RPC metrics tracks items that provides summary of RPC usage along with more detailed per method statistics that tracks number of method calls made, time spent on that call. Combining both summary and detailed together results in large metrics report which metrics collection systems may not handle. Proposal is to split the metrics into summary and detailed metrics. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7660-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:18:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33792 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78806 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78763 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78755 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:18:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:18:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2HoMg003700 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:17:50 GMT Message-ID: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:17:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory --------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6724 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Reporter: Todd Lipcon Assignee: Todd Lipcon If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7661-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:20:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34553 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:20:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 79552 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79514 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79506 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:20:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:20:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2Jp3C006294 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:19:51 GMT Message-ID: <11361609.187011272248391582.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:19:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6724: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6724.txt > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7662-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:20:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34740 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 79966 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79934 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 79926 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:20:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:20:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2Jqsg006325 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:19:52 GMT Message-ID: <28074545.187111272248392609.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:19:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6724: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7663-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:37:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41081 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:37:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 84096 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84000 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83992 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:37:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:37:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:37:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2ani1008436 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:36:50 GMT Message-ID: <29774751.187151272249409872.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:36:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6523) add an expiration date field to Token class. In-Reply-To: <2119481605.137151264795714568.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Homan reassigned HADOOP-6523: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > add an expiration date field to Token class. > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6523 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6523 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6523.patch > > > Needed by MAPREDUCE-1430 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7664-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:41:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42481 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:41:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:41:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 84382 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:41:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84286 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84278 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:41:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:41:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:41:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2eqqH010127 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:40:52 GMT Message-ID: <29783386.187171272249652361.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:40:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860785#action_12860785 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6724: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442801/hadoop-6724.txt against trunk revision 937881. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/479/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/479/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/479/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/479/console This message is automatically generated. > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7665-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:45:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44221 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:45:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 86250 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86167 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86159 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:45:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2inJU010187 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:44:50 GMT Message-ID: <500439.187271272249889862.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:44:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6723) unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients In-Reply-To: <33033218.184741272223549956.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6723: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6723.txt Patch simply catches the exception and closes down the connection. The included test case times out without this patch, since the call waits forever. > unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6723.txt > > > If the server sends back some malformed data, for example, receiveResponse() can end up with an incorrect call ID. Then, when it tries to find it in the calls map, it will end up with null and throw NPE in receiveResponse. This isn't caught anywhere, so the original IPC client ends up hanging forever instead of catching an exception. Another example is if the writable implementation itself throws an unchecked exception or OOME. > We should catch Throwable in Connection.run() and shut down the connection if we catch one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7666-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 02:45:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44276 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 86344 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86302 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86294 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:45:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:45:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q2ioq5010193 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:44:50 GMT Message-ID: <25129167.187291272249890467.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:44:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6723) unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients In-Reply-To: <33033218.184741272223549956.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6723: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6723.txt > > > If the server sends back some malformed data, for example, receiveResponse() can end up with an incorrect call ID. Then, when it tries to find it in the calls map, it will end up with null and throw NPE in receiveResponse. This isn't caught anywhere, so the original IPC client ends up hanging forever instead of catching an exception. Another example is if the writable implementation itself throws an unchecked exception or OOME. > We should catch Throwable in Connection.run() and shut down the connection if we catch one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7667-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 04:09:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 88341 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 04:09:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 04:09:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 13861 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:09:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13814 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13806 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 04:09:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:09:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:09:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q49Y2p004148 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:09:34 GMT Message-ID: <29763440.421272254974013.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:09:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860796#action_12860796 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- I agree we can discuss a change in semantics elsewhere. I'll commit this tomorrow (Monday) as it will be good to get this change in before they appear in a release, and we start applying the annotations more widely in HADOOP-6668 and MAPREDUCE-1623. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7668-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 04:16:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 91616 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 15126 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15022 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15014 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:16:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:16:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q4GXt3004203 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:16:34 GMT Message-ID: <12187537.551272255393907.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:16:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860798#action_12860798 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- The patch I submitted backs out HADOOP-6420 - should I regenerate leaving it in? > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7669-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 04:26:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95379 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 04:26:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 04:26:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16939 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16829 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 04:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16814 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 04:26:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:26:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1345.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:26:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q4QWdL004266 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:26:32 GMT Message-ID: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:26:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6725 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Test Components: test Reporter: Jakob Homan Priority: Minor HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7670-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 05:34:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24199 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 05:34:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 05:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 42197 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 05:34:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42084 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 05:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42076 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 05:33:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:33:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:33:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q5XYEQ004830 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:33:34 GMT Message-ID: <3836635.1891272260014356.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:33:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris Douglas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860817#action_12860817 ] Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-6698: --------------------------------------- bq. The patch I submitted backs out HADOOP-6420 - should I regenerate leaving it in? Reverting it isn't part of this issue, but I'm +0 on retaining it. Is there another use case, other than the patch in MAPREDUCE-1126? > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7671-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 06:27:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 54150 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 06:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 06:27:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 71893 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 06:27:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71777 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 06:27:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71769 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 06:27:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:27:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:27:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3Q6RWRI005240 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:27:32 GMT Message-ID: <10870082.2661272263252439.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:27:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-5647) TestJobHistory fails if /tmp/_logs is not writable to. Testcase should not depend on /tmp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-5647: --------------------------------- Release Note: Removed dependency of testcase on /tmp and made it to use test.build.data directory instead. > TestJobHistory fails if /tmp/_logs is not writable to. Testcase should not depend on /tmp > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5647 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5647 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-5647.patch, yhadoop20-5647.patch > > > TestJobHistory sets /tmp as hadoop.job.history.user.location to check if the history file is created in that directory or not. If /tmp/_logs is already created by some other user, this test will fail because of not having write permission. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7672-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 10:19:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66516 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 10:19:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 10:19:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 64045 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 10:19:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62918 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 10:18:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62894 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 10:18:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:18:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:18:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QAIX9s007378 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:18:33 GMT Message-ID: <11909011.6021272277113014.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:18:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Johannes Zillmann (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6726) can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6726 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6726 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: ipc Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Johannes Zillmann One can set _ipc.client.connect.max.retries_ for _org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client_. This comes to effect on IOExceptions but not on SocketTimeoutException. Client$Connection:307: {code:java} } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { /* The max number of retries is 45, * which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 minutes retries. */ handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); } catch (IOException ie) { handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7673-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 10:20:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 67451 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 10:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 10:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 67204 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 10:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67104 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 10:20:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67094 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 10:20:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:20:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1347.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:20:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QAKXLL007412 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:20:34 GMT Message-ID: <101218.6081272277233759.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 06:20:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Johannes Zillmann (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6726) can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException In-Reply-To: <11909011.6021272277113014.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860883#action_12860883 ] Johannes Zillmann commented on HADOOP-6726: ------------------------------------------- It would be fine if _ipc.client.connect.max.retries_ would also be applied to SocketTimeoutException or another config value would be introduced! > can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6726 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6726 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Johannes Zillmann > > One can set _ipc.client.connect.max.retries_ for _org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client_. > This comes to effect on IOExceptions but not on SocketTimeoutException. > Client$Connection:307: > {code:java} > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* The max number of retries is 45, > * which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7674-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 11:21:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96672 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 11:21:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 11:21:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20793 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 11:21:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20683 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 11:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20675 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 11:21:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:21:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:20:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QBKauq007873 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:20:36 GMT Message-ID: <9817259.6681272280836439.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:20:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Thomas Koch (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4675) Current Ganglia metrics implementation is incompatible with Ganglia 3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860896#action_12860896 ] Thomas Koch commented on HADOOP-4675: ------------------------------------- It would be awesome, if somebody could provide a patch for 0.20, then the upcomming Debian Squezze will get this patch and work together with the version of Ganglia in Debian Squeeze. I'm not enough into any of both to work on this. > Current Ganglia metrics implementation is incompatible with Ganglia 3.1 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4675 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4675 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: metrics > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Brian Bockelman > Assignee: Brian Bockelman > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-4675-2.patch, hadoop-4675-3.patch, HADOOP-4675-4.patch, HADOOP-4675-v5.patch, HADOOP-4675-v6.patch, HADOOP-4675-v7.patch, HADOOP-4675-v8.patch, HADOOP-4675-v9.patch, hadoop-4675.patch > > > Ganglia changed its wire protocol in the 3.1.x series; the current implementation only works for 3.0.x. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7675-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 18:45:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42384 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 18:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 18:45:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 24110 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 18:45:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24087 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 18:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24079 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 18:45:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:45:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:45:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QIjWJv012170 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:45:33 GMT Message-ID: <24529574.14631272307532975.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:45:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861040#action_12861040 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6725: -------------------------------------------- Seems like what we need is [JSPUnit|http://www.jboss.org/jsfunit/] for our front-end UI is auto-generated by JSP. JSPUnit runs on top of HtmlUnit framework though. > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7676-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 18:53:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46348 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 30739 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30637 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:53:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:53:07 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QIqk5X012243 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:46 GMT Message-ID: <16242805.14831272307966014.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:52:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861046#action_12861046 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6725: ------------------------------------- That works too. > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7677-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 20:36:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13992 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 91474 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91453 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91445 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:36:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:36:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QKaW5A013071 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:36:32 GMT Message-ID: <8566780.16531272314192201.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:36:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6723) unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients In-Reply-To: <33033218.184741272223549956.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861085#action_12861085 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-6723: ------------------------------------- Hudson didn't post. http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/480/ [exec] +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment [exec] http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442802/hadoop-6723.txt [exec] against trunk revision 937881. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. [exec] [exec] +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. [exec] [exec] +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. > unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6723.txt > > > If the server sends back some malformed data, for example, receiveResponse() can end up with an incorrect call ID. Then, when it tries to find it in the calls map, it will end up with null and throw NPE in receiveResponse. This isn't caught anywhere, so the original IPC client ends up hanging forever instead of catching an exception. Another example is if the writable implementation itself throws an unchecked exception or OOME. > We should catch Throwable in Connection.run() and shut down the connection if we catch one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7678-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 20:50:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22147 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14317 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14211 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14203 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:50:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1350.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:50:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QKoXFk013343 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:50:34 GMT Message-ID: <28218978.17101272315033769.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:50:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6461) webapps aren't located correctly post-split In-Reply-To: <428473464.1261365498148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6461: ----------------------------------- Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Component/s: util uprating the severity as without this the webapps may not work, it all depends on the classpath order. > webapps aren't located correctly post-split > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6461 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, hadoop-6461.patch, HADOOP-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt, hadoop-6461.txt > > > Post-split, when one builds common it creates an empty build/webapps dir. If you then try to launch the NN for example using HADOOP_HDFS_HOME=/path/to/hdfs hdfs namenode, HttpServer.getWebAppsPath locates the empty common webapps dir, and the NN web UI fails to load. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7679-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 20:56:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27877 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 20288 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20247 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 20238 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:56:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:56:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QKuXju013460 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:56:33 GMT Message-ID: <25321906.17361272315393692.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:56:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6194.patch This is the most recent version of the lifecycle/service base class for hadoop-common # Named {{HadoopService}} so that the Service in the security package doesn't cause confusion # the protected methods are {{serviceStart}} and {{serviceClose{{ # Anything purely of interest to those nodes that have workers is in the abstract subclass {{HadoopServiceWithWorkers}}. Currently there's just one abstract method to return the no of workers, though I'd like there to be a standard way to get the list of workers and ports and last reported time, which we could then feed to management tools and a standard servlet that would report this up. That is future work, these base classes just set things up. > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7680-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:02:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31444 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29598 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29565 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 29557 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:02:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1350.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:02:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QL2Xf7013523 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:02:33 GMT Message-ID: <14904601.17511272315753494.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:02:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 (was: 0.21.0) > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7681-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:03:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31611 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:03:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 30424 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:03:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30384 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:03:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30376 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:03:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:03:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:03:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QL2e2T013586 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:02:40 GMT Message-ID: <27469060.17721272315760135.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:02:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861108#action_12861108 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6713: --------------------------------------- This is a great idea! Separating "accept" from "read" should also greatly reduce the Connection reset errors observed at the client when NameNode is busy. Dhruba asked me to review this patch. So here are a few comments: 1. Please remove the System.out.println or change it to be a log statement; 2. Listener#run() should remove doRead() else branch; 3. Now that accept is done is a separate thread, doAccept() should accept as many as possible (not limit to up to 10 as in the trunk). Another option is to use a blocking accept channel. 4. Optional: the synchronization between listener thread & read thread is very interesting. It took me a while to figure out that it works. But it seems to me that the code is hard to understand and maintain. Another option is that each reader thread maintains a queue of pending registration channels. After choosing a reader, a listener thread simply adds an accepted channel into its pending queue and then wakes up the reader thread. Each reader thread registers all the pending channels before select(). > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7682-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:25:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45242 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 55202 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55153 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55145 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1350.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLPYSF013839 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:34 GMT Message-ID: <18756309.18371272317134591.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmytro Molkov updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6713.2.patch modifying the patch to address Hairong's comments: 1. Removed the System.out 2. Removed doRead from listener#run 3. Changed the code to accept all the connections in the queue 4. I wrote a comment on startAdd method to explain the synchronization a little. The reason I went with this decision is to keep the semantics of doAccept. After the iteration with certain channel that channel is registered with the selector and is ready to be read. Otherwise it possibly could affect other parts of the code, when the connection is accepted (doAccept iteration for the channel is over) but connectionList is not modified yet. And the connection is only created when the channel is registered with selector. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7683-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:26:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45322 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 55366 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55334 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55326 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:26:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLPb8F013890 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:25:37 GMT Message-ID: <21543601.18541272317137036.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:25:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmytro Molkov updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7684-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:27:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47022 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 57348 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57311 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57303 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:27:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1350.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:27:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLRZNO013943 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:27:35 GMT Message-ID: <30511846.18711272317255191.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:27:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmytro Molkov updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Resubmitting for Hudson > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7685-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:44:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55143 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 69649 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69598 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69590 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:44:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLhaDU014150 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:36 GMT Message-ID: <12022251.19231272318216558.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:43:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861130#action_12861130 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6713: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442902/HADOOP-6713.2.patch against trunk revision 938136. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/52/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/52/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/52/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/52/console This message is automatically generated. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7686-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56153 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 73598 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73562 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73554 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:46:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLjdto014192 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:45:39 GMT Message-ID: <11060154.19301272318339010.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861131#action_12861131 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442895/HADOOP-6194.patch against trunk revision 938136. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1026 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1024 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/481/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/481/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/481/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/481/console This message is automatically generated. > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7687-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 21:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56189 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 21:46:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 73725 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73695 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73687 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:46:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:46:01 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QLjeL4014204 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:45:40 GMT Message-ID: <31761926.19341272318340443.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Christian Kunz (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6726) can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException In-Reply-To: <11909011.6021272277113014.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861132#action_12861132 ] Christian Kunz commented on HADOOP-6726: ---------------------------------------- I completely agree. A client's retry behavior should not be hard-coded into a library. Imagine a high number of clients overwhelming the namenode with requests -- currently there is no easy way for clients to implement a decent backoff scheme such that the namenode can recover. > can't control maxRetries in case of SocketTimeoutException > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6726 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6726 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Johannes Zillmann > > One can set _ipc.client.connect.max.retries_ for _org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client_. > This comes to effect on IOExceptions but not on SocketTimeoutException. > Client$Connection:307: > {code:java} > } catch (SocketTimeoutException toe) { > /* The max number of retries is 45, > * which amounts to 20s*45 = 15 minutes retries. > */ > handleConnectionFailure(timeoutFailures++, 45, toe); > } catch (IOException ie) { > handleConnectionFailure(ioFailures++, maxRetries, ie); > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7688-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 22:45:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 87839 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 16320 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16281 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16272 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:45:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1350.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:45:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QMjWkp007647 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:45:32 GMT Message-ID: <7896991.20651272321932479.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:45:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I've committed this! > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7689-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 22:47:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 89213 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19444 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19417 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19409 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:47:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:47:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QMlWWu007781 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <1043036.20721272322052831.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:47:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6692) Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator In-Reply-To: <253397745.22171270762596744.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6692: ---------------------------------- Release Note: This issue adds Iterator listStatus(Path) to FileContext, moves FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to FileContext#Util, and adds Iterator listStatusItor(Path) to AbstractFileSystem which provides a default implementation by using FileStatus[] listStatus(Path). Component/s: fs > Add FileContext#listStatus that returns an iterator > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6692 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6692 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Hairong Kuang > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: listStatusItor.patch, listStatusItor1.patch, listStatusItor2.patch > > > Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7690-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 23:15:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 5351 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 44292 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44198 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44190 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:15:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1351.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:15:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QNFXhN025082 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:15:33 GMT Message-ID: <1959824.21091272323733712.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6708) New file format for very large records In-Reply-To: <23756292.153431271370052193.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861161#action_12861161 ] Aaron Kimball commented on HADOOP-6708: --------------------------------------- Possibly. But then we'd have to wait for the next Avro release as well, and then ensure that this Avro version works with the available Hadoop releases, which would introduce further dependency-management complications. The point of doing this large object format work here is for broader compatibility. Until Avro compatibility in general is improved in Hadoop (e.g., resolution of MAPREDUCE-815), it doesn't seem like this directly facilitates this goal. > New file format for very large records > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6708 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6708 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: io > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > Assignee: Aaron Kimball > Attachments: lobfile.pdf > > > A file format that handles multi-gigabyte records efficiently, with lazy disk access -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7691-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Mon Apr 26 23:35:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13636 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 65699 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65668 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 65660 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:35:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1351.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:35:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3QNZXqo003126 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:35:33 GMT Message-ID: <2161375.21431272324933481.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:35:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861169#action_12861169 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- Hi Eli, sorry for the delay for getting back to this issue. I was on vacation & worked on a cluster emergency after I came back. But I got some time to think more about this proposed FileContext change. I am quite concerned about removing FileContext#exists. This is a useful often-used method that's not easy for a user to write. Do you think if it is a good idea that we still keep this method but put it in FileContext#Util with a comment saying that "be cautious about using this method." and list a few scenarios that could avoid calling this method? > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7692-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 01:47:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 81919 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 37202 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37169 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 37160 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1351.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:47:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R1lXfq005640 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <17037022.22901272332853694.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:47:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6526) Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names In-Reply-To: <786866304.151051264870594555.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861202#action_12861202 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6526: -------------------------------------------- Latest patch introduces {{src/test/krb5.conf}} which is needed by a couple of tests only. The use of this configuration file for some tests is enabled by the property java.security.krb5.conf. Kerberos has a bug in the implementation of the logic around this property (see http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6857795) This badly affects any tests running from under ant environment (i.e. Herriot tests (HADOOP-6332)) and on another hand isn't sufficient for Eclipse environment. > Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6526 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.2.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.4.patch > > > We need a configurable mapping from full user names (eg. omalley@APACHE.ORG) to local user names (eg. omalley). For many organizations it is sufficient to just use the prefix, however, in the case of shared clusters there may be duplicated prefixes. A configurable mapping will let administrators resolve the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7693-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 01:49:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82726 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 39300 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39268 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39260 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:49:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:49:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R1nWYM008567 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:49:32 GMT Message-ID: <13539320.22991272332972499.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:49:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6526) Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names In-Reply-To: <786866304.151051264870594555.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Boudnik updated HADOOP-6526: --------------------------------------- Attachment: 3595485.patch Another issue is that the setting affects _all_ tests. This is especially bad for tests which are running on an actual cluster but from the source workspace i.e. Herriot tests. This settings forces default realm to be set to APACHE.ORG which is non-sensical in environments with different realm names. A better way is to set this property directly in the functional tests requiring this config file. Other tests shouldn't be affected. This is dirty hack to workaround the problem, although we shouldn't be modifying the whole build just because of a couple of tests requiring a custom config file. > Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6526 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: 3595485.patch, c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.2.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.4.patch > > > We need a configurable mapping from full user names (eg. omalley@APACHE.ORG) to local user names (eg. omalley). For many organizations it is sufficient to just use the prefix, however, in the case of shared clusters there may be duplicated prefixes. A configurable mapping will let administrators resolve the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7695-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 03:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28644 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 94296 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94059 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94050 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R3lpqh020783 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:47:51 GMT Message-ID: <31640475.23961272340071829.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:47:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch, HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7694-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 03:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28623 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 94183 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94049 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94032 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R3lYRm020762 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:47:34 GMT Message-ID: <12835587.23891272340054549.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:47:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6677.patch Updated patch for trunk. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch, HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7696-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 03:48:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28754 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 03:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 94357 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94323 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94315 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 03:48:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:48:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R3lrOI020804 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:47:53 GMT Message-ID: <14851832.24031272340073091.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:47:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch, HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7697-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:13:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39072 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:13:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 817 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 649 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 632 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4DZ9u021550 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:35 GMT Message-ID: <15262957.24351272341615579.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:13:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6698.patch Here's a new patch which doesn't revert HADOOP-6420 (we can always revert if separately, if need be). > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7698-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:14:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39141 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 924 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 859 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 851 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4DcU5021616 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:38 GMT Message-ID: <19950495.24571272341618412.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:13:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7699-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:14:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39209 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1069 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1026 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1018 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:14:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4Db9n021583 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:13:37 GMT Message-ID: <20238804.24461272341617024.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:13:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6698: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Assignee: Tom White > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7700-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48284 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:31:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:31:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 8232 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:31:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8114 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8106 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:31:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:31:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:31:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4VVRo021843 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:31:32 GMT Message-ID: <25342261.25111272342691786.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861235#action_12861235 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6724: ----------------------------------- +1 (Nice Mockito test.) > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7701-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:35:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50079 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:35:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9421 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9302 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9290 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4ZWr3021877 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:33 GMT Message-ID: <5128259.25151272342932881.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:35:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861236#action_12861236 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6722: ----------------------------------- +1 > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7702-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:35:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 50160 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 9508 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9477 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9462 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4ZY69021910 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:35:34 GMT Message-ID: <5791448.25261272342934621.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:35:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861237#action_12861237 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442922/HADOOP-6698.patch against trunk revision 938264. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 12 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/53/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/53/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/53/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/53/console This message is automatically generated. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7703-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:39:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 51667 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 10415 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10302 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10274 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:39:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:39:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:39:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4dWan021948 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:39:33 GMT Message-ID: <33427005.25321272343172894.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:39:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6667) RPC.waitForProxy should retry through NoRouteToHostException In-Reply-To: <1055367164.614271270066767200.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6667: ------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks Todd! > RPC.waitForProxy should retry through NoRouteToHostException > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6667 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6667 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6667.txt > > > RPC.waitForProxy already loops through ConnectExceptions, but NoRouteToHostException is not a subclass of ConnectException. In the case that the NN is on a VIP, the No Route To Host error is reasonably common during a failover, so we should retry through it just the same as the other connection errors. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7704-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:47:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55012 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:47:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:47:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12805 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:47:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12694 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12686 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:47:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:47:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:47:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4lVVG022009 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:47:32 GMT Message-ID: <3522478.25441272343651857.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:47:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6623) Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator In-Reply-To: <621076782.115561267860687191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6623: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Looks good. Since this is an optimization, we should really have a benchmark showing a speed improvement. > Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6623 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6623.txt > > > This is for HDFS-1028 but useful generally. String.split("/") for example is way slower than an implementation that is specific to only single-character separators. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7705-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 04:57:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59328 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 04:57:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 04:57:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 21482 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:57:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21381 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 04:57:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 21369 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 04:57:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:57:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1352.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:57:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R4vWlA022068 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:57:33 GMT Message-ID: <4754926.25521272344252778.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:57:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6714) FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs In-Reply-To: <19191606.14561271692729693.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White reassigned HADOOP-6714: --------------------------------- Assignee: Patrick Angeles > FsShell 'hadoop fs -text' does not support compression codecs > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6714 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6714 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Patrick Angeles > Assignee: Patrick Angeles > Attachments: HADOOP-6714.patch > > > Currently, 'hadoop fs -text myfile' looks at the first few magic bytes of a file to determine whether it is gzip compressed or a sequence file. This means 'fs -text' cannot properly decode .deflate or .bz2 files (or other codecs specified via configuration). > It should be fairly straightforward to add support for other codecs by checking the file extension against the CompressionCodecFactory to retrieve an appropriate Codec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7706-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 07:09:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31632 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 07:09:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 07:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7338 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 07:09:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 07:09:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7210 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 07:09:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:09:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:09:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3R79Xae023234 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:09:33 GMT Message-ID: <29131110.27361272352173284.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:09:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861271#action_12861271 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6677: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442921/HADOOP-6677.patch against trunk revision 938322. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/482/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/482/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/482/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/482/console This message is automatically generated. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch, HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7707-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 14:10:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45170 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 14:10:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 14:10:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 208 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 14:10:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99852 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 14:10:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99844 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 14:10:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:10:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:10:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3REAXbM002467 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:10:33 GMT Message-ID: <8291744.33771272377433440.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:10:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861404#action_12861404 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Some comments on the latest patch: * Naming: maybe "LifecycleService" instead of "HadoopService"? "MockService" could be "MockLifecycleService". * Also, just "State" instead of "ServiceState", so the full form would be "LifecycleService.State". Some methods already refer to "State", while others refer to "ServiceState", so this change would help make this more regular. * Javadoc on line 44 of HadoopService is malformed. * It's unclear what the unit test is testing - the code in HadoopService, or the code in MockService, or both? In general, mocks are used as doubles for testing logic in the real class. Can the code be changed to make the distinction clearer? * As Chris pointed out, it would be good to know that a real service daemon works with this base code. > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7708-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 16:36:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94401 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 11431 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11334 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11326 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:36:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1355.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:36:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RGaWRJ004379 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:36:32 GMT Message-ID: <8330645.36881272386192489.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:36:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6623) Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator In-Reply-To: <621076782.115561267860687191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6623: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6623.txt Attached is an updated patch which adds a main() function to TestStringUtils which acts as a benchmark. Benchmark results; Java impl #4:1339ms Java impl #5:1095ms Java impl #6:1257ms Java impl #7:1386ms Java impl #8:1470ms Java impl #9:1467ms StringUtils impl #4:274ms StringUtils impl #5:274ms StringUtils impl #6:274ms StringUtils impl #7:277ms StringUtils impl #8:289ms StringUtils impl #9:291ms If I double the number of separators in the test string to 10, results are: Java impl #4:1407ms Java impl #5:1411ms Java impl #6:1449ms Java impl #7:1443ms Java impl #8:1641ms Java impl #9:1409ms StringUtils impl #4:347ms StringUtils impl #5:347ms StringUtils impl #6:346ms StringUtils impl #7:347ms StringUtils impl #8:355ms StringUtils impl #9:346ms > Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6623 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6623.txt, hadoop-6623.txt > > > This is for HDFS-1028 but useful generally. String.split("/") for example is way slower than an implementation that is specific to only single-character separators. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7709-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 16:38:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94610 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 16:38:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 16:38:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 12124 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:38:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12017 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:38:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12009 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 16:38:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:38:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:38:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RGcWMs008357 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:38:33 GMT Message-ID: <9374912.36911272386312800.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:38:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6623) Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator In-Reply-To: <621076782.115561267860687191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HADOOP-6623: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6623 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6623.txt, hadoop-6623.txt > > > This is for HDFS-1028 but useful generally. String.split("/") for example is way slower than an implementation that is specific to only single-character separators. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7710-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 16:55:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98097 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 16:55:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 16:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 38810 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38778 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38770 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 16:55:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:55:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1355.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:55:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RGtWHS027998 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:55:34 GMT Message-ID: <8165324.37131272387332709.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:55:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6677) InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum In-Reply-To: <680532766.665461270239927272.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6677: ------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. > InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate should take a string not an enum > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6677 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6677 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Alan Gates > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6677.patch, HADOOP-6677.patch > > > Trying to keep the list of all possible components sharing limited private interfaces up to date is painful. As other subprojects beyond HDFS and MR use this interface it will only get worse (see PIG-1311). If it is converted to a string other subprojects can use it without requiring patches to common. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7711-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 17:20:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3900 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 71860 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71828 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71820 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1355.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RHKWKr018503 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:32 GMT Message-ID: <30704813.37611272388832445.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:20:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6600) mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols In-Reply-To: <337583123.549081267171588168.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-6600: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6600-6.patch merged with the latest in trunk > mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6600 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6600-1-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-1.patch, HADOOP-6600-3-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-4-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-5.patch, HADOOP-6600-6.patch, HADOOP-6600-BP20-fix.patch, HADOOP-6600.patch > > > allow configuration of authorization for based on protocol (inter-server). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7712-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 17:20:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3945 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 72007 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71980 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71972 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RHKXQp018512 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:20:33 GMT Message-ID: <14423344.37641272388833509.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:20:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Boris Shkolnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6600) mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols In-Reply-To: <337583123.549081267171588168.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Boris Shkolnik updated HADOOP-6600: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6600 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6600-1-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-1.patch, HADOOP-6600-3-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-4-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-5.patch, HADOOP-6600-6.patch, HADOOP-6600-BP20-fix.patch, HADOOP-6600.patch > > > allow configuration of authorization for based on protocol (inter-server). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7713-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 17:41:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8091 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 94620 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94590 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 94582 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:40:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RHeZ0C018736 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:40:36 GMT Message-ID: <4179769.37951272390035863.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:40:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861466#action_12861466 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6713: --------------------------------------- +1 Note that this patch assigns read channels to readers in a round-robin fashion. Ideally it would be nicer if all readers share a set of selected keys and ready-to-read channels are dynamically assigned to each reader. This would enforce better balance among readers. But I think we could have this improvement at a later time. > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7714-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 17:44:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 9014 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 1933 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1907 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1899 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:44:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:44:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RHiWUJ018769 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:44:32 GMT Message-ID: <29523211.38021272390272274.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:44:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6600) mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols In-Reply-To: <337583123.549081267171588168.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861468#action_12861468 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6600: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442975/HADOOP-6600-6.patch against trunk revision 938563. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/54/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/54/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/54/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/54/console This message is automatically generated. > mechanism for authorization check for inter-server protocols > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6600 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6600 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Boris Shkolnik > Assignee: Boris Shkolnik > Attachments: HADOOP-6600-1-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-1.patch, HADOOP-6600-3-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-4-BP20.patch, HADOOP-6600-5.patch, HADOOP-6600-6.patch, HADOOP-6600-BP20-fix.patch, HADOOP-6600.patch > > > allow configuration of authorization for based on protocol (inter-server). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7715-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 18:16:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 24825 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 18:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 18:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 53258 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:16:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53231 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:16:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 53191 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 18:16:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:16:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1355.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:16:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RIGatE019141 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:16:36 GMT Message-ID: <9996549.38671272392196697.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:16:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6713) The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck In-Reply-To: <20387500.4981271656489920.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6713: ---------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks, Dmytro! > The RPC server Listener thread is a scalability bottleneck > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6713 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6713 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: Dmytro Molkov > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.2.patch, HADOOP-6713.patch > > > The Hadoop RPC Server implementation has a single Listener thread that reads data from the socket and puts them into a call queue. This means that this single thread can pull RPC requests off the network only as fast as a single CPU can execute. This is a scalability bottlneck in our cluster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7716-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 18:41:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44634 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 95426 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95395 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 95387 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:41:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:41:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RIfWss019446 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:41:32 GMT Message-ID: <25091072.38951272393692243.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:41:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6623) Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator In-Reply-To: <621076782.115561267860687191.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861488#action_12861488 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6623: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442970/hadoop-6623.txt against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/483/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/483/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/483/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/483/console This message is automatically generated. > Add StringUtils.split for non-escaped single-character separator > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6623 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6623 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hadoop-6623.txt, hadoop-6623.txt > > > This is for HDFS-1028 but useful generally. String.split("/") for example is way slower than an implementation that is specific to only single-character separators. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7717-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 18:43:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45695 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 97896 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97869 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97860 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:43:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:43:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RIhWhd019519 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:43:32 GMT Message-ID: <8589517.39021272393812574.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:43:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6701.v20s.patch) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7718-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 18:47:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48111 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3981 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3944 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3936 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RIlW7q019609 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <3943820.39131272394052688.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:47:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7719-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 18:47:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48130 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4149 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4084 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4076 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RIlXg2019618 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:33 GMT Message-ID: <23225552.39161272394053866.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:47:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Phulari (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Phulari updated HADOOP-6701: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7720-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 20:48:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 74204 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 50608 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50585 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 50577 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:48:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1356.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:48:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RKmW2Q021487 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:48:32 GMT Message-ID: <19260242.41221272401312673.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:48:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861531#action_12861531 ] Owen O'Malley commented on HADOOP-6693: --------------------------------------- To figure out the time take for login, we also need the number of logins to divide by. I'd suggest adding the number of successes and failures for keytab logins. > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7721-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18374 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60415 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60375 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60339 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM3XHc022928 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:34 GMT Message-ID: <8376663.43661272405813571.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:03:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6194.patch This is an updated patch which * uses the name LifecycleService for the class, LifecycleServiceWithWorkers for the subclass intended for services with workers. * added much more javadocs and even some more test cases to the test I'll stick up the HDFS services tomorrow; I will synchronise and run all the tests. The big changes there are primarily in adding more shutdown logic to remove all threads; this could be teased out to make the lifecycle patch look smaller. I have a patch for the JT and TT too; the only troublespot there is in startup, where I believe it can block forever waiting for the filesystem to go live in startup. There's also MAPREDUCE-437. These are separate issues from how you start and stop the things, just needed to make sure that when you start or stop them they clean up and don't ever block waiting for some external dependency like a functional filesystem. > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7722-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:03:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 18415 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 61526 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61492 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 61457 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:03:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM3ZHc022952 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:03:35 GMT Message-ID: <6219512.43741272405815855.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:03:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7723-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:07:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20371 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 68116 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68042 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68034 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM7ZbP023058 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:35 GMT Message-ID: <31382041.43921272406055031.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:07:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Kicking hudson. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7724-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:07:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 20480 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 68345 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68298 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68290 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM7XKT023045 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:34 GMT Message-ID: <4232508.43881272406053723.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:07:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7725-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:10:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21487 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 69380 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69345 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69337 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM9ahl023164 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:36 GMT Message-ID: <4612573.44181272406176320.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:09:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7726-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:10:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21519 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 69519 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69482 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69474 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM9Ye1023119 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:34 GMT Message-ID: <16842392.44041272406174104.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:09:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6668.patch New patch with changes for HADOOP-6677. Using this patch I've generated [javadoc|http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/api/] and [JDiff with 0.20|http://people.apache.org/~tomwhite/HADOOP-6668/docs/jdiff/changes.html]. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7727-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:10:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 21598 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:09:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 69658 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69624 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69616 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RM9ZJC023142 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:09:35 GMT Message-ID: <11770232.44111272406175314.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:09:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6668: ------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7728-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:11:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 23032 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 73092 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73060 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73052 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:11:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:11:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMBYot023230 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:11:34 GMT Message-ID: <1652137.44331272406294367.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:11:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran updated HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7729-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:23:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28016 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 80363 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80320 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80312 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:23:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:23:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMNXI9023444 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:23:33 GMT Message-ID: <18057927.44711272407013101.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:23:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6668) Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common In-Reply-To: <1543391482.614961270068327308.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861587#action_12861587 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6668: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443010/HADOOP-6668.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/55/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/55/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/55/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/55/console This message is automatically generated. > Apply audience and stability annotations to classes in common > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6668 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6668 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation > Reporter: Tom White > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch, HADOOP-6668.patch > > > Mark private implementation classes with the InterfaceAudience.Private or InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate annotation to exclude them from user Javadoc and JDiff. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7730-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:29:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31030 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 84523 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84499 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 84491 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:29:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:29:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMTWFj023546 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:29:32 GMT Message-ID: <16855474.44841272407372240.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861590#action_12861590 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6693: ----------------------------------------- Owen, MetricsTimeVaryingRate exposes two pieces of information: Number of operations and average time taken for the operation. Does it cover your requirement? I will change the patch to include two metrics - one for tracking login success and another for login failure. > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7731-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:31:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31775 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 85172 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85131 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85123 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:31:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:31:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMVWbi023577 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:31:32 GMT Message-ID: <5921865.44871272407492430.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:31:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861591#action_12861591 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6693: ----------------------------------------- Also should we add metrics for logout? > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7732-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:41:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36215 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 92634 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92592 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 92584 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:41:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:41:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMfWGL023770 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:41:32 GMT Message-ID: <27108051.45131272408092596.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:41:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6693) Add metrics to track kerberos login activity In-Reply-To: <1138587062.22291270763196714.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6693: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6693.1.patch New patch adds MetricsTimeVaryingRate metrics for login success and failure. > Add metrics to track kerberos login activity > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6693 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6693 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6693.1.patch, HADOOP-6693.patch > > > Need metrics to track kerberos login activity such as login rate and the time taken for login. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7733-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:45:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38521 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 97075 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97049 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 97011 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:45:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:45:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMjbBh023865 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:45:37 GMT Message-ID: <17543651.45321272408337430.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:45:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861602#action_12861602 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441659/hadoop-6563-2.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/484/console This message is automatically generated. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7734-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:47:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39528 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1094 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1078 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:47:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:47:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMlZ2e023918 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:47:35 GMT Message-ID: <29547932.45441272408455082.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:47:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6703: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6703-3.patch Patch attached removed the dependency on HADOOP-6563 and merges with trunk. This one just needs to go in with HDFS-1100 which has a +1. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch, hadoop-6703-3.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7735-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:49:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40480 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2015 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1985 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 1977 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:49:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:49:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMnXOO023971 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:49:33 GMT Message-ID: <13960683.45531272408573306.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:49:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6703: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch, hadoop-6703-3.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7736-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 22:59:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44832 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 15534 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15422 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15409 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:59:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:59:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RMxXhv024129 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:59:33 GMT Message-ID: <7658105.45771272409173127.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:59:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861609#action_12861609 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6194: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443007/HADOOP-6194.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The applied patch generated 1026 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1024 warnings). +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/56/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/56/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/56/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/56/console This message is automatically generated. > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7737-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:25:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56015 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 30889 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30846 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30838 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNPXj0024388 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:34 GMT Message-ID: <6452536.46081272410733849.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:25:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6563-3.patch Attached patch merges with trunk. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7738-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:25:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56025 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31041 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30981 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 30970 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNPYff024394 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:34 GMT Message-ID: <458587.46101272410734299.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:25:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7739-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:25:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 56075 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 31153 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31116 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31108 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNPYOs024406 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:25:34 GMT Message-ID: <31685420.46141272410734694.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:25:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7740-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:40:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61442 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 35071 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:39:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34961 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:39:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 34917 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:39:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:39:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:39:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNdZap024582 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:39:35 GMT Message-ID: <27804597.46491272411575818.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:39:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861620#action_12861620 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443020/hadoop-6563-3.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. -1 javac. The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. -1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/57/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/57/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/57/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/57/console This message is automatically generated. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7741-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:43:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63062 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 39216 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39191 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39183 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNhZOO024622 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:35 GMT Message-ID: <6218727.46591272411815222.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:43:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6727) Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs In-Reply-To: <27900682.46541272411814280.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6727: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6727 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6727-1.patch > > > HADOOP-6537 added UnresolvedLinkException to the throws clause and java docs of FileContext public APIs. FileContext fully resolves symbolic links, UnresolvedLinkException exception is only used internally by FSLinkResolver. I'll attach a patch which updates the APIs and javadoc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7742-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:43:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63171 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 39506 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39468 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39460 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNhYFO024607 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:34 GMT Message-ID: <27900682.46541272411814280.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:43:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6727) Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6727 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Reporter: Eli Collins Assignee: Eli Collins Priority: Minor Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Attachments: hadoop-6727-1.patch HADOOP-6537 added UnresolvedLinkException to the throws clause and java docs of FileContext public APIs. FileContext fully resolves symbolic links, UnresolvedLinkException exception is only used internally by FSLinkResolver. I'll attach a patch which updates the APIs and javadoc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7743-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Apr 27 23:43:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63208 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 39656 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39612 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 39604 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3RNhZAv024616 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:43:35 GMT Message-ID: <663125.46571272411815033.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:43:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6727) Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs In-Reply-To: <27900682.46541272411814280.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6727: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6727-1.patch > Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6727 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6727-1.patch > > > HADOOP-6537 added UnresolvedLinkException to the throws clause and java docs of FileContext public APIs. FileContext fully resolves symbolic links, UnresolvedLinkException exception is only used internally by FSLinkResolver. I'll attach a patch which updates the APIs and javadoc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7744-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 00:01:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71574 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 54208 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54148 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54098 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S01YTh024871 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:34 GMT Message-ID: <32623682.46961272412894896.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:01:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7745-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 00:01:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71612 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 54899 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54873 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 54865 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S01Xi4024850 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:33 GMT Message-ID: <9277001.46891272412893022.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:01:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7746-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 00:01:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71736 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 55044 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55008 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55000 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S01Yu6024865 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01:34 GMT Message-ID: <100100.46941272412894692.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:01:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6563-4.patch Right patch this time - sorry for the noise. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7747-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 00:05:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73630 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 57316 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57284 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 57272 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:05:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1357.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:05:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S05VPR024903 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:05:32 GMT Message-ID: <30130416.46981272413131757.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:05:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6727) Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs In-Reply-To: <27900682.46541272411814280.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861625#action_12861625 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6727: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443023/hadoop-6727-1.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/58/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/58/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/58/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/58/console This message is automatically generated. > Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6727 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6727-1.patch > > > HADOOP-6537 added UnresolvedLinkException to the throws clause and java docs of FileContext public APIs. FileContext fully resolves symbolic links, UnresolvedLinkException exception is only used internally by FSLinkResolver. I'll attach a patch which updates the APIs and javadoc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7748-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 00:20:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 80751 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 64760 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64734 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64726 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:20:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:20:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S0KWb9025011 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:20:32 GMT Message-ID: <1606532.47041272414032076.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:20:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861627#action_12861627 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443025/hadoop-6563-4.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/59/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/59/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/59/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/59/console This message is automatically generated. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7749-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 02:07:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 39220 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 42622 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42593 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 42585 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:07:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:07:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S27YTn027396 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:07:34 GMT Message-ID: <22280907.48461272420454687.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:07:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861645#action_12861645 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6678: ------------------------------------- Hey Hairong, no worries - looking at the implementation of FileContext#exists I think it can be simplified: {code} public boolean exists(final Path f) throws AccessControlException, IOException { try { return getFileStatus(f) != null; } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { return false; } catch (UnsupportedFileSystemException e) { return false; } catch (UnresolvedLinkException e) { return false; } } {code} # AFS#getFileStatus should never return null, eg see Hdfs#getFileStatus. Per the spec if should throw a FileNotFoundException if f does not exist. # Seems like the client should have to deal with UnsupportedFileSystemException rather than have FC#exists swallow it # UnresolvedLinkException will never be thrown (see HADOOP-6727) Therefore I think we can write FC#exists as {code} public boolean exists(final Path f) throws AccessControlException, UnsupportedFileSystemException, IOException { try { FileStatus fs = getFileStatus(f); assert fs != null; return true; } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { return false; } } {code} Since this is still not a one-liner putting it in FileContext#util seems reasonable to me. I'll send out new patches. > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7750-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 02:11:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 40833 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 45375 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45263 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45255 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:11:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:11:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S2BWUm027433 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:11:32 GMT Message-ID: <17506266.48501272420692262.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:11:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metric framework MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Overhaul metric framework ------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6728 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Luke Lu Fix For: 0.20.3 Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. * Support metrics schema for plugins. The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7751-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 02:13:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 41731 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 49234 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49208 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 49200 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:13:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:13:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S2DVFY027445 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:13:32 GMT Message-ID: <7703070.48531272420811844.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:13:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6727) Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs In-Reply-To: <27900682.46541272411814280.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861646#action_12861646 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6727: ------------------------------------- Just updating throws clauses and java docs, hence the lack of tests. > Remove UnresolvedLinkException from public FileContext APIs > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6727 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6727 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6727-1.patch > > > HADOOP-6537 added UnresolvedLinkException to the throws clause and java docs of FileContext public APIs. FileContext fully resolves symbolic links, UnresolvedLinkException exception is only used internally by FSLinkResolver. I'll attach a patch which updates the APIs and javadoc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7752-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 02:40:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53563 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 02:40:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 02:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 63340 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:40:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63313 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 02:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 63305 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 02:40:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:40:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:40:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S2eW54027706 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:40:33 GMT Message-ID: <18861639.48801272422432910.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:40:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6729) serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6729 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6729 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Components: conf Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Ted Yu org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.JavaSerialization isn't included in io.serializations by default. When a class which implements the Serializable interface is used, user would see the following without serializer.JavaSerialization: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.SerializationFactory.getSerializer(SerializationFactory.java:73) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.(MapTask.java:759) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.(MapTask.java:487) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:575) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7753-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 03:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63052 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 03:17:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 03:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 76571 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 03:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76448 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 03:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76439 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 03:17:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:17:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:17:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S3GvDd018534 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:16:57 GMT Message-ID: <1341397.49011272424617203.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:16:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861656#action_12861656 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6703: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443017/hadoop-6703-3.patch against trunk revision 938590. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/485/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/485/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/485/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/485/console This message is automatically generated. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch, hadoop-6703-3.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7754-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 03:22:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63424 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 03:22:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 03:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 78856 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 03:22:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78760 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 03:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78752 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 03:22:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:22:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:22:52 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S3MVd3019644 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:22:32 GMT Message-ID: <28673486.49031272424951920.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:22:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6729) serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default In-Reply-To: <18861639.48801272422432910.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861657#action_12861657 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6729: ----------------------------------- The JavaSerialization was written as an experimental serialization, to prove the abstraction. I'm not sure it should be enabled by default since it's not efficient, hasn't been tested at scale (as far as I know), and we should encourage users to use other serializations like Writables or Avro. In any case, we could improve the error message if the type is Serializable, or print a warning. > serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6729 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6729 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.JavaSerialization isn't included in io.serializations by default. > When a class which implements the Serializable interface is used, user would see the following without serializer.JavaSerialization: > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.SerializationFactory.getSerializer(SerializationFactory.java:73) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.(MapTask.java:759) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.(MapTask.java:487) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:575) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7755-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 05:34:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1148 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 05:34:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31632 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31510 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31497 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S5YXK1002859 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:33 GMT Message-ID: <26804697.50211272432873072.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:34:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6701: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch Refreshing the patch for hudson to pickup. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7756-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 05:34:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 1202 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31685 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31657 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 31649 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S5YXQw002868 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:34:33 GMT Message-ID: <5954593.50241272432873757.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:34:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6701: ------------------------------------ Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0, 0.19.1 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7757-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 05:36:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2273 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 05:36:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 05:36:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 33019 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:36:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32907 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32899 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 05:36:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:36:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:36:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S5aWLF002890 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:36:33 GMT Message-ID: <9064030.50271272432992699.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:36:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6701: ------------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.20.2, 0.20.1, 0.20.0, 0.19.1 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7758-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 05:43:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 4795 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 05:43:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 05:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 38561 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38467 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 38459 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 05:43:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:43:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:42:59 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S5gcKD002973 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:42:39 GMT Message-ID: <18056048.50391272433358979.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:42:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861679#action_12861679 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6703: ----------------------------------------- +1 for the patch. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch, hadoop-6703-3.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7759-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 05:48:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 7445 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 05:48:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 05:48:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 43567 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43474 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 05:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 43466 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 05:48:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:48:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:48:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S5mWcZ003052 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:48:32 GMT Message-ID: <9926802.50441272433712344.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:48:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6703) Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself In-Reply-To: <23186149.74901271194550994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6703: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I committed the patch. Thank you Eli. > Prevent renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6703 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6703-1.patch, hadoop-6703-2.patch, hadoop-6703-3.patch > > > Per HDFS-1088 let's throw a FileAlreadyExistsException if renaming a file, symlink or directory to itself, or a symlink to the file it links to. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7760-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 06:00:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12042 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 06:00:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 06:00:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 51918 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51816 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 51807 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 06:00:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:00:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:00:54 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S60WKN003230 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:00:32 GMT Message-ID: <27687348.50491272434432767.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:00:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6631) FileUtil.fullyDelete() should continue to delete other files despite failure at any level. In-Reply-To: <615835698.224041268388087233.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6631: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6631.patch Attaching patch for trunk. > FileUtil.fullyDelete() should continue to delete other files despite failure at any level. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6631 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6631 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs, util > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6631.patch > > > Ravi commented about this on HADOOP-6536. Paraphrasing... > Currently FileUtil.fullyDelete(myDir) comes out stopping deletion of other files/directories if it is unable to delete a file/dir(say because of not having permissions to delete that file/dir) anywhere under myDir. This is because we return from method if the recursive call "if(!fullyDelete()) {return false;}" fails at any level of recursion. > Shouldn't it continue with deletion of other files/dirs continuing in the for loop instead of returning false here ? > I guess fullyDelete() should delete as many files as possible(similar to 'rm -rf'). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7761-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 06:10:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14608 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 06:10:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 06:10:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 58848 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:10:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58759 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58748 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 06:10:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:10:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1358.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:10:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S6AWKE003414 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:10:32 GMT Message-ID: <1639458.50661272435032580.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:10:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861685#action_12861685 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------------- Modified the table you have a little bit. Hopefully it has more clarity: ||Source||Dest||Result|| |fileA|fileB|fileB is removed. fileA is renamed fileB| | |dirB|Fails: both need to be file or directory| | |linkB|linkB is removed (regardles of what it points to). fileA is renamed linkB| |dirA|fileB|Fails: both need to be file or directory| | |dirB|dirB is deleted(if empty). dirA is renamed to dirB| | |linkB|Fails: if Source is a directory, then Dest must be a directory| |linkA|fileB|fileB is deleted. linkA renamed to fileB| | |dirB|if Dest is a directory then Source must be a directory| | |linkB|linkB is removed (regardless of what it points to. linkA is renamed to linkB| Comments: # typo danling # testRenameSymlinkToFileItLinksTo - when rename fails, should the test check for exception? Is this part of another jira? # Why is creating dangling links allowed? # Tests are hard to follow without additional descprition in the test methods what is being tested and what is expected. It took me a while to follow the tests. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7762-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 06:29:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28218 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 06:29:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 06:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 71667 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:29:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71542 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 06:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 71532 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 06:28:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:28:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:28:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S6SXI0003634 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:28:34 GMT Message-ID: <2368186.50821272436113332.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:28:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6536) FileUtil.fullyDelete(dir) behavior is not defined when we pass a symlink as the argument In-Reply-To: <508958946.48471265176519280.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ravi Gummadi updated HADOOP-6536: --------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6536.patch Attaching patch for trunk. This patch is on top of HADOOP-6631. > FileUtil.fullyDelete(dir) behavior is not defined when we pass a symlink as the argument > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6536 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6536 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6536.patch > > > FileUtil.fullyDelete(dir) deletes contents of sym-linked directory when we pass a symlink. If this is the behavior, it should be documented as so. > Or it should be changed not to delete the contents of the sym-linked directory. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7763-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:02:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71515 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 59222 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58979 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:01:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58963 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:01:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1359.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S81alO005191 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:36 GMT Message-ID: <11761180.52441272441696331.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:01:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-6634: ------------------------------ Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Running it through Hudson. > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7764-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:02:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71548 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 59348 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59305 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58983 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:01:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S81ZWe005167 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:35 GMT Message-ID: <13000090.52361272441695151.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:01:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V updated HADOOP-6634: ------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt Patch for trunk. The testcase change should serve as both verifying the patch as well as a regression test. > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7765-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:02:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71572 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 59442 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59318 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 58982 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:01:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:57 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S81ZXc005179 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:01:35 GMT Message-ID: <11368997.52401272441695713.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:01:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vinod K V reassigned HADOOP-6634: --------------------------------- Assignee: Vinod K V > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7766-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:25:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83598 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 96710 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96579 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96473 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1359.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:25:53 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S8PW9A005549 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:25:33 GMT Message-ID: <31291762.52831272443132973.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:25:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861721#action_12861721 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6634: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443050/HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt against trunk revision 938788. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/60/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/60/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/60/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/60/console This message is automatically generated. > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7767-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:50:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95992 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:50:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:50:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12643 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:50:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12593 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 12585 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:49:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:49:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1359.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:49:58 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S8ncfb005972 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:49:38 GMT Message-ID: <15341575.53281272444578393.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:49:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861730#action_12861730 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6701: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443038/HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch against trunk revision 938788. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/486/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/486/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/486/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/486/console This message is automatically generated. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7768-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 08:53:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 97922 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 19410 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19369 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:53:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:53:56 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3S8rYIH006054 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:53:34 GMT Message-ID: <13676591.53341272444814663.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:53:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ravi Gummadi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861731#action_12861731 ] Ravi Gummadi commented on HADOOP-6634: -------------------------------------- Patch for trunk looks good. +1 > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7769-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 10:23:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 45196 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 10:23:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 10:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 19864 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 10:22:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19738 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 10:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19577 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 10:22:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:22:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1359.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:22:55 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SAMZXP007829 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:22:35 GMT Message-ID: <25848725.54941272450155089.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 06:22:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861754#action_12861754 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6725: ---------------------------------------- I am +1 for this and anything else which tests the webapps. HtmlUnit is the best in-java web app test framework I know of; I use it on my code. Right now we have some tests for a servlet or two, but nothing looks at the JSP/webapp content, so things like HADOOP-6461 aren't being picked up # HtmlUnit is looking at moving to the ASF; support from the Hadoop team would be welcome # JSF unit is separate, it's testing Java Server Faces. HtmlUnit will happily test JSP and pages with javascript in them # For ease of testing, HTML elements need IDs. HADOOP-5388 covers this. The tags and the tests can go hand in hand. # I can help with setting up the test framework, try and get Marc Guillemot to review the design too. I would really benefit from some HtmlUnit tests that could be run against a live cluster rather than just a miniDFS and miniMR cluster; the tests could be something standalone/redistributable that could be given the URL of a NN, DN, JT or TT and scan through all the expected pages. Having sequences to submit jobs and other actions then becomes further work. > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7770-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 15:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 68707 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 15:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 15:50:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 45045 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:50:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45023 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 15:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 45015 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 15:50:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:50:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:50:00 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SFnc2d013735 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:49:39 GMT Message-ID: <15604563.59261272469778644.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:49:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6721) Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses In-Reply-To: <13254833.145371271962071069.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Owen O'Malley resolved HADOOP-6721. ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: site Resolution: Fixed I just committed this to hadoop/logos. > Create a new logo for Hadoop security related uses > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6721 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6721 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Fix For: site > > Attachments: hadoop-helmet.jpg, hadoop-security-logo.jpg > > > We've created a new logo for Hadoop security topics that we wanted to share with the community. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7771-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:22:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95897 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 70583 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70553 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70545 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:22:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:22:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHLmrs015332 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:21:48 GMT Message-ID: <21490757.631272475308647.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:21:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6729) serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default In-Reply-To: <18861639.48801272422432910.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861847#action_12861847 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6729: ----------------------------------- One inefficiency of JavaSerialization is the fact that it stores the classname with every record. This is actually worse than normal Java serialization, which uses backreferences to classnames to make the resulting stream more compact. This optimization is disabled in Hadoop (see JavaSerializationSerializer#serialize()) because records are reordered in the shuffle, which would break back references. Another inefficiency is that JavaSerialization creates a new object every time the deserialize() is called. In the context of large scale data processing, where there may be billions of records, this is very expensive, which is why Writables and Avro reuse instances. > serializer.JavaSerialization should be added to io.serializations by default > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6729 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6729 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: conf > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ted Yu > > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.JavaSerialization isn't included in io.serializations by default. > When a class which implements the Serializable interface is used, user would see the following without serializer.JavaSerialization: > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.SerializationFactory.getSerializer(SerializationFactory.java:73) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.(MapTask.java:759) > at > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$NewOutputCollector.(MapTask.java:487) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.runNewMapper(MapTask.java:575) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask.run(MapTask.java:305) > at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Child.main(Child.java:170) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7772-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:32:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98755 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 85932 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85821 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85813 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:32:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:32:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHVoAA015570 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:31:50 GMT Message-ID: <29196702.1081272475910560.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:31:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861856#action_12861856 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6725: -------------------------------------------- As soon as HADOOP-6332 is in the trunk (I really hope to complete the forward port work before the end of May) we can start using Herriot framework to perform such tests. > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7773-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:32:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98808 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86075 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85961 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85953 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:32:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:32:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHVpq0015594 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:31:51 GMT Message-ID: <22717423.1161272475911658.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:31:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861857#action_12861857 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6725: -------------------------------------------- I meant 'using HtmlUnit' framework. > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7774-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:34:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 99824 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:34:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:34:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 93206 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93175 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93167 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:34:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:34:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:34:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHXoMt015625 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:33:50 GMT Message-ID: <21118885.1231272476030556.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:33:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6701) Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" In-Reply-To: <29784448.2801271097111992.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6701: ------------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] Release Note: Commands chmod, chown and chgrp now returns non zero exit code and an error message on failure instead of returning zero. Resolution: Fixed I committed the patch. Thank you Ravi. > Incorrect exit codes for "dfs -chown", "dfs -chgrp" > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6701 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6701 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.19.1, 0.20.0, 0.20.1, 0.20.2 > Reporter: Ravi Phulari > Assignee: Ravi Phulari > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-trunk.patch, HADOOP-6701-v20.patch > > > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chgrp abcd /; echo $? > chgrp: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chown abcd /; echo $? > chown: changing ownership of > 'hdfs://localhost/':org.apache.hadoop.security.AccessControlException: Permission denied > 0 > ravi@localhost:~$ hadoop dfs -chmod 755 /DOESNTEXIST; echo $? > chmod: could not get status for '/DOESNTEXIST': File does not exist: /DOESNTEXIST > 0 > - > Exit codes for both of the above invocations should be non-zero to indicate that the command failed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7775-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:38:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 747 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 99216 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99184 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99176 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:38:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHbm8W015668 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:37:48 GMT Message-ID: <23276844.1271272476268763.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:37:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6724) IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory In-Reply-To: <4486259.186941272248270321.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6724: ------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks Todd! > IPC doesn't properly handle IOEs thrown by socket factory > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6724 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.3, 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6724.txt > > > If the socket factory throws an IOE inside setupIOStreams, then handleConnectionFailure will be called with socket still null, and thus generate an NPE on socket.close(). This ends up orphaning clients, etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7776-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:40:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2406 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:40:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3955 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3919 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 3911 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:40:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:40:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:40:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHdoTp015707 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:39:51 GMT Message-ID: <15310065.1331272476390931.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:39:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861863#action_12861863 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- > I think we can write FC#exists as.. +1. Thank you, Eli! > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7777-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:48:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6987 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15297 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15265 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 15257 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:48:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:48:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHlpN9015846 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:47:51 GMT Message-ID: <2551419.1541272476871253.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:47:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6722) NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself In-Reply-To: <10234488.178701272152510902.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White updated HADOOP-6722: ------------------------------ Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks Todd! > NetUtils.connect should check that it hasn't connected a socket to itself > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6722 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6722 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: util > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6722.txt > > > I had no idea this was possible, but it turns out that a TCP connection will be established in the rare case that the local side of the socket binds to the ephemeral port that you later try to connect to. This can present itself in very very rare occasion when an RPC client is trying to connect to a daemon running on the same node, but that daemon is down. To see what I'm talking about, run "while true ; do telnet localhost 60020 ; done" on a multicore box and wait several minutes. > This can be easily detected in NetUtils.connect by making sure the local address/port is not equal to the remote address/port. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7778-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 17:52:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10398 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 17:52:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 17:52:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27911 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:52:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27885 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 17:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 27877 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 17:52:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:52:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:52:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SHpnva015923 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:51:49 GMT Message-ID: <5690651.1611272477108997.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:51:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6723) unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients In-Reply-To: <33033218.184741272223549956.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861868#action_12861868 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6723: ----------------------------------- +1 > unchecked exceptions thrown in IPC Connection orphan clients > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6723 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ipc > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Todd Lipcon > Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6723.txt > > > If the server sends back some malformed data, for example, receiveResponse() can end up with an incorrect call ID. Then, when it tries to find it in the calls map, it will end up with null and throw NPE in receiveResponse. This isn't caught anywhere, so the original IPC client ends up hanging forever instead of catching an exception. Another example is if the writable implementation itself throws an unchecked exception or OOME. > We should catch Throwable in Connection.run() and shut down the connection if we catch one. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7779-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 18:21:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27095 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 78258 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78153 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78144 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:21:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:21:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SIKq9v016610 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:20:52 GMT Message-ID: <12184905.2671272478852187.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:20:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Luke Lu (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6728) Overhaul metrics framework In-Reply-To: <17506266.48501272420692262.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Lu updated HADOOP-6728: ---------------------------- Summary: Overhaul metrics framework (was: Overhaul metric framework) Assignee: Luke Lu Fix Version/s: 0.22.0 (was: 0.20.3) Affects Version/s: 0.20.2 > Overhaul metrics framework > -------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6728 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 0.20.2 > Reporter: Luke Lu > Assignee: Luke Lu > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Per discussions with Arun, Chris, Hong and Rajiv, et al, we concluded that the current metrics framework needs an overhaul to: > * Allow multiple plugins for different monitoring systems simultaneously (see also: HADOOP-6508). > * Refresh metrics plugin config without server restart. > ** Including filtering of metrics per plugin. > * Support metrics schema for plugins. > The jira will be resolved when core hadoop components (hdfs, mapreduce) are updated to use the new framework . Updates to external components that use the existing metrics framework will be tracked by different issues. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7780-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 18:52:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 48836 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 8078 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8044 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 8036 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:52:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1361.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:52:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SIpnwn017470 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:51:49 GMT Message-ID: <8913331.3881272480709335.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:51:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6730) FileContext#copy needs unit tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 FileContext#copy needs unit tests --------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6730 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6730 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs Affects Versions: 0.22.0 Reporter: Eli Collins Fix For: 0.22.0 I modifed FileContext#checkDest in HADOOP-6678 and noticed it's only caller FileContext#copy has no callers itself. It needs unit tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7781-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 19:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 59706 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 19:14:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 19:14:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 32263 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 19:14:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32196 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 19:14:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 32133 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 19:14:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:14:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1361.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:14:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SJDnv1021213 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:13:49 GMT Message-ID: <4671784.4281272482029710.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:13:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6678: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6678-2.patch Thanks Hairong. Patch attached. * Removes FC#isFile and FC#isDirectory, and uses thereof. * Refactors FC#exists per previous comment and moves to Util * Refactors FC#checkDest. Note that it is now passed overwrite instead of false. It (and it's callers) needs unit tests. Filed HADOOP-6730 for that. * Adds Path#getName tests to TestPath to sanity check my understanding of FC#checkDest. * Modifies test classes to use the new helper methods Still needs to be applied with HDFS-1089 (easy 4 line patch). ant test-core passes. > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7782-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:02:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15807 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 72870 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72843 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72833 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1362.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SL1okb014217 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:01:50 GMT Message-ID: <1021566.6631272488510169.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:01:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Chen updated HADOOP-6515: ------------------------------- Attachment: HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7783-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:02:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15854 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 73028 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72979 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 72971 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1362.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SL1pse014239 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:01:51 GMT Message-ID: <23463341.6701272488511146.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:01:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Chen updated HADOOP-6515: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7784-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:02:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 15956 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 73283 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73251 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73243 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:02:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SL1rlp014270 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:01:53 GMT Message-ID: <9236384.6801272488513130.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:01:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Chen updated HADOOP-6515: ------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7785-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:04:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17125 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 73980 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73904 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 73896 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:04:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:04:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SL3oJ1016312 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:03:51 GMT Message-ID: <16304949.6901272488630309.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:03:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Scott Chen (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861939#action_12861939 ] Scott Chen commented on HADOOP-6515: ------------------------------------ It has been a while so the patch doesn't apply. I have update it. @Dhruba, I have removed the sleep in the test. Could you help me review this patch again? Thanks. > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7786-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:26:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29791 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 87531 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87494 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 87486 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:26:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:26:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SLPnDj001451 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:25:49 GMT Message-ID: <23678751.7091272489949674.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:25:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861942#action_12861942 ] Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-6678: --------------------------------------- +1. The patch looks good to me. > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7787-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:30:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32030 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 90636 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90570 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 90562 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:30:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1362.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:30:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SLTokp001492 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:29:50 GMT Message-ID: <7445672.7141272490190062.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:29:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jitendra Nath Pandey (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-6687) user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. In-Reply-To: <191053771.27981270592254332.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jitendra Nath Pandey reassigned HADOOP-6687: -------------------------------------------- Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > user object in the subject in UGI should be reused in case of a relogin. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6687 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Assignee: Jitendra Nath Pandey > Attachments: HADOOP-6687-y20.2.patch > > > In case of a relogin, a new user object is created in the subject. This causes the subject to lose some state for example authentication method. Instead, a new user object should not be added to the subject if one is already present. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7788-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 21:38:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 36761 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 102 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99885 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 99873 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:38:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1362.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:38:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SLbpVL001843 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:37:51 GMT Message-ID: <2049080.8131272490670987.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:37:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861950#action_12861950 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6194: ---------------------------------------- I've submitted a patch to the HDFS services under HDFS-326 which is in sync with this to show it works Now, how do you find out javac warnings that don't appear to get printed to the hudson console? > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7789-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:24:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61575 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 40933 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40903 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 40895 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:24:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMNpTA005546 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:23:51 GMT Message-ID: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:23:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not interpreted correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not interpreted correctly ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6731 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Reporter: Suresh Srinivas Assignee: Suresh Srinivas Fix For: 0.22.0 Octal umask 7 is interpreted as 700 instead of 007. Octal umask 77 is interpreted as 770 instead of 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7790-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:24:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 61632 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 41072 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41038 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 41030 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:24:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:24:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMNpf5005569 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:23:51 GMT Message-ID: <33393941.9761272493431748.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:23:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not interpreted correctly In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------ Component/s: fs > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not interpreted correctly > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Octal umask 7 is interpreted as 700 instead of 007. Octal umask 77 is interpreted as 770 instead of 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7791-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:28:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63331 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 46104 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46080 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 46068 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:28:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMRnF8010857 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:27:49 GMT Message-ID: <7125616.9841272493669162.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:27:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------ Summary: Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled (was: Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not interpreted correctly) Description: Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. (was: Octal umask 7 is interpreted as 700 instead of 007. Octal umask 77 is interpreted as 770 instead of 077.) > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7792-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:30:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 64215 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 47878 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47845 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47837 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:30:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:30:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMTneR015659 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:29:49 GMT Message-ID: <6251785.9871272493789315.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:29:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6713.patch Attached patch: # Handle single digit and two digit octal umasks # Interprets them and applies them correctly as in the description. > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6713.patch > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7793-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:34:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66049 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 52422 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52372 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52363 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:34:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMXoNi025466 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:33:50 GMT Message-ID: <29436901.9911272494030076.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:33:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------ Attachment: HADOOP-6731.patch Renaming the patch with correct jira number. > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6731.patch > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7794-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:34:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 66057 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 52581 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52508 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 52470 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:34:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:34:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMXosI025489 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:33:50 GMT Message-ID: <12812802.9931272494030506.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:33:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------ Attachment: (was: HADOOP-6713.patch) > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6731.patch > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7795-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:42:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70417 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 60566 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60503 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60495 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:42:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMfpEJ024898 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:41:51 GMT Message-ID: <28006824.10081272494511349.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:41:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6678: ---------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Hadoop Flags: [Incompatible change, Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change]) > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7796-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:42:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70476 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 60678 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60640 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 60632 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:42:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:42:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMfoWt024819 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:41:50 GMT Message-ID: <27422764.10021272494510170.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:41:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6678: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7797-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:50:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 75686 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 67316 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67267 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67259 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:50:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:50:14 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMnqet017091 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:49:52 GMT Message-ID: <17254952.10281272494992361.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:49:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861977#action_12861977 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6698: -------------------------------------- > HADOOP-6420 was completed with MAPREDUCE-1126 as a use case, but it's an independent feature. Does it need to be backed out? If it has no other use cases, it should be backed out, no? If someone comes up with a use case, we can add it back, but, since it was added with MAPREDUCE-1126 as its only use case, and MAPREDUCE-1126 has stalled, I'd vote to back it out. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7798-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:52:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76669 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 68710 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68685 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68677 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:52:13 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMpr8q020542 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:51:53 GMT Message-ID: <14299726.10561272495113374.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:51:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861982#action_12861982 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-6698: -------------------------------------- I should have been clearer: I'd vote to remove HADOOP-6420 as a part of this issue, since it's only current use case is to work with the serialization APIs that are being reverted in this issue. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7799-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:52:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 76697 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 68852 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68820 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 68812 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:52:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:52:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMpo5A020415 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:51:50 GMT Message-ID: <16216929.10421272495110621.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:51:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Aaron Kimball (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6194) Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util In-Reply-To: <165334509.1250255474864.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Kimball updated HADOOP-6194: ---------------------------------- Attachment: find-new-warnings Steve, I've attached a bash script that does some awk + diff magic on the trunk javac warnings and patch javac warnings output to attempt to discover the new ones. It does a reasonable job (at the very least, it should tell you which files to look at). > Add service base class and tests to hadoop-common/util > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6194 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6194 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: util > Affects Versions: 0.21.0 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: find-new-warnings, HADOOP-6194-1.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch, HADOOP-6194.patch > > > For a service base class, we need to add to common > # The Service class > # A mock Service class (it's not in test, its in src/, because it helps in functional tests downstream) > # Unit tests > This is the issue to cover this work -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7800-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 22:58:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 79802 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 22:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 74868 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:58:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74836 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 22:58:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 74828 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 22:58:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:58:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:58:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SMvnnQ002175 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:57:49 GMT Message-ID: <23406023.10631272495469609.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:57:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6710) Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix In-Reply-To: <8947165.155011271375809341.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas updated HADOOP-6710: ------------------------------------ Attachment: hadoop-6710.rel20.patch 20 version of the patch. > Symbolic umask for file creation is not consistent with posix > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6710 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Attachments: hadoop-6710.patch, hadoop-6710.rel20.patch > > > Currently both octal and symbolic umask are used to reset the file creation mode bits. This is not consistent with the behavior defined in posix. Making it consistent would avoid confusion to the HDFS users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7801-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 23:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 84143 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 78978 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78933 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 78925 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:06:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:06:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SN5oba008124 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:05:50 GMT Message-ID: <10352364.10791272495950440.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:05:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861989#action_12861989 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6678: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443114/hadoop-6678-2.patch against trunk revision 939026. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 24 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/61/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/61/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/61/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/61/console This message is automatically generated. > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7802-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Wed Apr 28 23:46:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2882 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 6318 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6260 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6252 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:46:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:46:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3SNjrHH017260 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:45:54 GMT Message-ID: <24818683.11321272498353794.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:45:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6698) Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api In-Reply-To: <21261745.7641270969841016.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861999#action_12861999 ] Tom White commented on HADOOP-6698: ----------------------------------- OK, I can remove HADOOP-6420 here. I'll commit this soon unless there are any objections. > Revert the io.serialization package to 0.20.2's api > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6698 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6698 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: io > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Tom White > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.21.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch, HADOOP-6698.patch > > > I have a lot of concern about the usability of the new generic serialization framework. Toward that end, I've filed a jira for improving it. There is resistance to pushing a new API into 0.21 at the last moment, so we should back out the changes rather than introducing a new api in 0.21 and deprecating it in 0.22. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7803-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 00:02:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 10843 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 18630 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18598 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 18590 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:02:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:02:12 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T01p0X019918 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:01:52 GMT Message-ID: <33129608.11541272499311823.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:01:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6678) Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists In-Reply-To: <360625036.668801270253667713.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hairong Kuang updated HADOOP-6678: ---------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] (was: [Incompatible change, Reviewed]) Resolution: Fixed I've just committed this. Thanks, Eli! > Remove FileContext#isFile, isDirectory and exists > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6678 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6678 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: fs > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6678-1.patch, hadoop-6678-2.patch > > > # Add a method Iterator listStatus(Path), which allows HDFS client not to have the whole listing in the memory, benefit more from the iterative listing added in HDFS-985. Move the current FileStatus[] listStatus(Path) to be a utility method. > # Remove methods isFile(Path), isDirectory(Path), and exists. > All these methods are implemented by calling getFileStatus(Path).But most users are not aware of this. They would write code as below: > {code} > FileContext fc = ..; > if (fc.exists(path)) { > if (fc.isFile(path)) { > ... > } else { > ... > } > } > {code} > The above code adds unnecessary getFileInfo RPC to NameNode. In our production clusters, we often see that the number of getFileStatus calls is multiple times of the open calls. If we remove isFile, isDirectory, and exists from FileContext, users have to explicitly call getFileStatus first, it is more likely that they will write more efficient code as follow: > {code} > FileContext fc = ...; > FileStatus fstatus = fc.getFileStatus(path); > if (fstatus.isFile() { > ... > } else { > ... > } > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7804-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 00:08:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14161 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 25884 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25850 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25842 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:08:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T07nZe025467 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:07:49 GMT Message-ID: <15529177.11731272499669322.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:07:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Suresh Srinivas (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862007#action_12862007 ] Suresh Srinivas commented on HADOOP-6563: ----------------------------------------- Ignore my comment 3, since symlinks should allow creation of dangling links. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7805-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 00:30:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 32403 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 56239 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56207 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 56198 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:30:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:30:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T0Toix006784 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:29:50 GMT Message-ID: <21883365.12751272500990461.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:29:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862027#action_12862027 ] Eli Collins commented on HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------- +1 Looks good to me. > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6731.patch > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7806-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 00:38:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 35668 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 59852 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59796 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59788 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:38:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:38:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T0boKZ004175 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:37:50 GMT Message-ID: <29620962.12831272501470064.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:37:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hairong Kuang (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6732) Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Improve FsShell's heap consumption by switching to listStatus that returns an iterator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6732 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6732 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Hairong Kuang Fix For: 0.22.0 When listing a large directory from the command line using the default heap configuration, FsShell often runs out of memory. This is because all stats of the entries under the directory need to be in memory before printing them. The new API listStatus that returns an iterator of FileStatus, which implemented in HDFS-1091, no longer requires that all entries are fetched first. Thus switching to this new API will greatly improve the use of heap space. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7807-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 00:48:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42696 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 70515 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70471 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 70463 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:48:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T0lp9p019686 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:47:51 GMT Message-ID: <20072337.13341272502071348.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:47:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862034#action_12862034 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-6515: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12443121/HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch against trunk revision 939140. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/487/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/487/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/487/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-h4.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/487/console This message is automatically generated. > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7808-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 01:09:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 46866 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 82909 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82884 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82876 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:09:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1363.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:09:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T18oN9020005 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:08:51 GMT Message-ID: <19107557.13681272503330896.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Konstantin Boudnik (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6526) Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names In-Reply-To: <786866304.151051264870594555.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862041#action_12862041 ] Konstantin Boudnik commented on HADOOP-6526: -------------------------------------------- [The patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12442917/3595485.patch] is done on top of the last {{HADOOP-6526-y20.4.patch}} and isn't for commit. > Need mapping from long principal names to local OS user names > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6526 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6526 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: security > Reporter: Owen O'Malley > Assignee: Owen O'Malley > Attachments: 3595485.patch, c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526-y20.patch, c-6526.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.2.patch, HADOOP-6526-y20.4.patch > > > We need a configurable mapping from full user names (eg. omalley@APACHE.ORG) to local user names (eg. omalley). For many organizations it is sufficient to just use the prefix, however, in the case of shared clusters there may be duplicated prefixes. A configurable mapping will let administrators resolve the issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7809-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 01:13:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 47180 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 85295 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85267 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 85259 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:13:11 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T1Cne8020057 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:12:50 GMT Message-ID: <4696179.13771272503569659.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:12:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jakob Homan (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6731) Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled In-Reply-To: <2800020.9731272493431396.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862043#action_12862043 ] Jakob Homan commented on HADOOP-6731: ------------------------------------- If this change goes through, we should update the documentation in FsShell.java (in common): {noformat} "\tMODE\tMode is same as mode used for chmod shell command.\n" + "\t\tOnly letters recognized are 'rwxXt'. E.g. +t,a+r,g-w,+rwx,o=r\n\n" + "\tOCTALMODE Mode specifed in 3 or 4 digits. If 4 digits, the first may\n" + "\tbe 1 or 0 to turn the sticky bit on or off, respectively. Unlike " + "\tshell command, it is not possible to specify only part of the mode\n" +{noformat} Eli - it's always good to consider the other components as well! > Octal umask with less than 3 digits is not handled > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6731 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6731 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6731.patch > > > Umasks with less than three digits should be accepted as valid umask. Umask with single digit, say 7, should be handled as 007. Similarly umask with two digits, say 77, should be handled as 077. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7810-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 03:33:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 65453 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 67219 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67103 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 67095 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:33:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:33:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T3Wmf6027501 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:32:48 GMT Message-ID: <2563190.15351272511968608.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:32:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom White (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6733) Create a test for FileSystem API compatibility between releases MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Create a test for FileSystem API compatibility between releases --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6733 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6733 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Components: fs Reporter: Tom White Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.21.0 We should have an automated test for checking that programs written against an old version of the FileSystem API still run with a newer version. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7811-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 04:34:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70689 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 04:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 91572 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91445 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91436 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1364.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:09 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T4XnFO022924 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:33:49 GMT Message-ID: <23398578.16061272515629443.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:33:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch, hadoop-6563-5.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7812-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 04:34:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70732 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 91624 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91588 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91580 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T4XmWS022912 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:33:49 GMT Message-ID: <1185465.16021272515628759.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:33:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Attachment: hadoop-6563-5.patch The updated table is more clear, thanks. Modified tests like testRenameSymlinkToFileItLinksTo check the particular exception thrown (like the tests that cover renaming a file, directory, etc to itself). Added additional comments to the tests and fixed the typo. Patch attached. > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch, hadoop-6563-5.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7813-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 04:34:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 70744 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 04:34:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 91765 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91723 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 91615 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:34:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T4Xn6r022918 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:33:49 GMT Message-ID: <20334088.16041272515629233.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:33:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Eli Collins (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6563) Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths In-Reply-To: <293016623.222581265940867991.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins updated HADOOP-6563: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add more tests to FileContextSymlinkBaseTest that cover intermediate symlinks in paths > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6563 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6563 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: fs, test > Affects Versions: 0.22.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: hadoop-6563-1.patch, hadoop-6563-2.patch, hadoop-6563-3.patch, hadoop-6563-4.patch, hadoop-6563-5.patch > > > Intermediate symlinks in paths are covered by the tests that use /linkToDir/file, /linkToDir/subDir, etc eg testCreateVia* in FileContextSymlinkBaseTest. I'll add additional tests to cover other basic operations on paths like /dir/linkToSomeDir/file beyond create() and open(). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7814-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 04:48:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 73002 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 04:48:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 04:48:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 2959 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2934 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 04:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2923 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 04:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1364.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:48:10 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T4loba023131 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:47:50 GMT Message-ID: <20524089.16611272516470209.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:47:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6515) Make maximum number of http threads configurable In-Reply-To: <1919319763.85831264619136665.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862094#action_12862094 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-6515: ------------------------------------------ +1 patch looks good. > Make maximum number of http threads configurable > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6515 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Scott Chen > Assignee: Scott Chen > Attachments: HADOOP-6515-v2.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.1.patch, HADOOP-6515-v3.patch, HADOOP-6515.patch > > > We found that http server threads may use considerable amount of resource in NameNode and JobTracker. > It would be good if the number of threads is allowed to be configured to a smaller number. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7815-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 09:34:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28574 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 09:34:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 09:34:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 93051 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:34:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93029 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:34:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 93021 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 09:34:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:34:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:34:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T9Xto3025460 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:33:55 GMT Message-ID: <33320469.2111272533635600.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:33:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sharad Agarwal (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-6634) AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail In-Reply-To: <136802909.310821268816187241.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharad Agarwal updated HADOOP-6634: ----------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed] Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks Vinod. > AccessControlList uses full-principal names to verify acls causing queue-acls to fail > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6634 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6634 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security > Reporter: Vinod K V > Assignee: Vinod K V > Fix For: 0.22.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-6634-20100317-ydist.1.txt, HADOOP-6634-20100428.txt > > > ACL configuration so far was using short user-names. With the changed {{UserGroupInformation}}, short names are different from the long fully-qualified names. {{AccessControlList}} continues to use {{UserGroupInformation.getUserName()}} for verifying access control. Because of this, queue acls fail for a user "user@domain.org" even though the short name "user" is part of the acl configuration. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7816-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 09:40:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 29737 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 09:40:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 09:40:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5210 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:40:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4912 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 4901 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 09:40:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:40:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T9dsb0025489 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:39:54 GMT Message-ID: <23151929.2131272533994276.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:39:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862144#action_12862144 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-6715: ----------------------------------- Um.. 'ALL', 'USERS', 'NONE' can themselves be users/groups and will lead to confusions, however corner-cased they might be. How about something simpler like the following? Essentially, I'm trying to make the space character stand out by using special chars '[' and ']' which are unlikely to end up in user/group names. {code} Job-ACLs: [*] Job-ACLs: [ ] Job-ACLs: [ group1] Job-ACLs: [user1,user2 group1,group2] {code} > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security, util > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7817-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 09:44:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 31433 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 09:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 09:44:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 9901 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:44:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9824 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 09:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9816 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 09:44:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:44:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:44:16 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3T9hsVw025502 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:43:54 GMT Message-ID: <33395135.2151272534234285.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:43:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Vinod K V (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6715) AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" In-Reply-To: <7375715.82441271756441695.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862145#action_12862145 ] Vinod K V commented on HADOOP-6715: ----------------------------------- In fact more spaces between user-list and group-list makes things clearer, I think {code} Job-ACLs: [*] Job-ACLs: [ ] Job-ACLs: [ group1] Job-ACLs: [user1,user2 group1,group2] {code} > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set acl to "*" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-6715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6715 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Bug > Components: security, util > Reporter: Ravi Gummadi > Assignee: Ravi Gummadi > > AccessControlList.toString() returns empty string when we set the acl to "\*" and also when we set it to empty(i.e. " "). This is causing wrong values for ACLs shown on jobdetails.jsp and jobdetailshistory.jsp web pages when acls are set to "\*". > I think AccessControlList.toString() needs to be changed to return "\*" when we set the acl to "\*". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7818-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 11:00:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49440 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 11:00:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 11:00:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 14410 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 11:00:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14279 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 11:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14262 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 11:00:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:00:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1365.3 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:00:15 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3TAxs8M027733 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:59:54 GMT Message-ID: <30509879.3061272538794368.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:59:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Joni Niemi (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-6734) Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore wrongly calls S3Service.createBucket during initialisation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore wrongly calls S3Service.createBucket during initialisation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HADOOP-6734 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6734 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: fs/s3 Affects Versions: 0.18.3 Environment: S3 Europe Reporter: Joni Niemi Reason: If a bucket is created with CreateBucketConfiguration specified, s3service.createBucket will fail. Symptoms: If a bucket has CreateBucketConfiguration, Jets3tNativeFileSystemStore will fail with BucketAlreadyOwnedByYou Error. A detailed descrioption from a blog (http://john.keyes.ie/boto-create_bucket-bucketalreadyownedbyyou-error/) {quote}This evening I encountered a problem with it though. When the bucket did not exist, the method behaved as expected. When the bucket did exist though I received the following error response: {code} BucketAlreadyOwnedByYou Your previous request to create the named bucket succeeded and you already own it. ... {code} This problem only manifests itself with buckets that are hosted in the EU. If the bucket is created in the US then the create_bucket method behaves as described. For buckets created with a , you will receive an error if you attempt to recreate the same bucket. To create a bucket in the EU, the bucket is created with a CreateBucketConfiguration specified. I now use the following code to avoid the problem and it works for both US and EU buckets. {code} def get_bucket(): try: bucket = conn.get_bucket('xxx', validate=True) except S3ResponseError, e: if e.code == "NoSuchBucket": bucket = conn.create_bucket('xxx', location='EU') else: raise e return bucket {code} {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7819-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 11:02:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 49962 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 11:02:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 11:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16717 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 11:02:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16598 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 11:02:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 16590 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 11:02:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:02:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1365.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:02:24 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3TB24VT027821 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:02:04 GMT Message-ID: <23276038.3221272538924298.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:02:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc Guillemot (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862156#action_12862156 ] Marc Guillemot commented on HADOOP-6725: ---------------------------------------- @Konstantin: this is not JSPUnit but JSFUnit. Do you use JSP or JSF? What kind of failures did you have in the past that should not occur again when tested (for instance with HtmlUnit)? > Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-6725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Test > Components: test > Reporter: Jakob Homan > Priority: Minor > > HtmlUnit (http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/) looks like it may be a good tool to help unit testing and evaluating our various webpages throughout the project. Currently this is done only occasionally in the code (usually falls to being a manual test during release cycles), and when it is done, usually the code to parse the webpage, etc. is re-written each time. The framework is Apache licensed, so including it won't be an issue. If it's found to be useful, new JIRAs for HDFS and MR should be opened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From common-issues-return-7820-apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Thu Apr 29 14:11:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16087 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 14:11:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 14:11:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 26694 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 14:11:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26672 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 14:11:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 26644 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 14:11:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:17 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3TEAtKp020372 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:10:55 GMT Message-ID: <12960288.5831272550255386.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:10:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" To: common-issues@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6725) Evaluate HtmlUnit for unit and regression testing webpages In-Reply-To: <9084581.651272255992465.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862205#action_12862205 ] Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-6725: ---------------------------------------- right now we have the situation in which pretty much none of the web UI is tested. API, yes, HTTP, no. There is a cute test that fetches some XML from a servlet and hands off the work to Xerces, but otherwise, nothing. This is unfortunate, as HADOOP-6461 shows -it is not clear that on SVN_TRUNK, the webapps are working. downstream, some people may be checking the web. My own deployment code takes a list of pages and runs through them, which is how I know about HADOOP-6461. What I would like to see test-wise is # Something to run through all the standard HTML, JSP pages, artwork, check for their presence. # Maybe: grab dependencies (stylesheets &c) # Fetch the logs The more advanced stuff is to run through some real operations: # create files via the client API, check you you can browse them # submit a job on the command line, and track it via the web UI Security: # Make unauthenticated calls and expect rejection. # Have something log